Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-22-1993 Council Packetr MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 Q roll The Counci I met on the above date with the fol lowing members present: Acting Mayor Goetten, CounciImembers Charles Kelley, JoEllen Hurr and Gabriel Jabbour. Mayor Edward Cal Iahan was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Septic Manager Stephen Weckman, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Acting Mayor Goetten called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Jabbour added Items #3, 4, 6 and 7. Acting Mayor Goetten removed Item #2. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 3, nays >•, Goetten abstained. Motions for all Items adopted by consent agenda will bs included In the minutes in their respective numerical order. (§2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Acting Mayor Goetten asked that Jan Haugen’s name be corrected on Page 12. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Hurr, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on February 8, 1993. Ayes 4 nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Susan Wilson was present to explain the Park Commission’s request. She said they wish to expand Summit Park beach area by 15’ westward, which will Involve the removal of one willow tree. They propose adding new buoys and maintaining the existing dock. The buoys will cost $1,700 and the additional sand $240, to be paid for from Pan* I^cdication Funds. Jabbour «<sKed if a variance will be needed for the removal of the tree within 75’ of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. Mabusth said a permit will be required, to be issued by the staff. The additional sand blanket should be approved by the DNR. Qerhardson noted the sand will only be dumped cn the shore. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 I PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - CONT. Hurr asked about the dock use and the liability of such. Wilson stated the dock Is used to Jump off and currently the City maintair i three beaches with a dock. Acting Mayor Goetten Inquired about parking. WlIson stated the Park Commission felt the parking Is adequate. She explained the Commission also requests authorization to install a 6”place canoe rack on the eastern end of the property at the request of several citizens. The plans and conditions presented are based on those estabiIshed and used by Plymouth. Acting Mayor Goetten asked if the rack will be visible from the road. Wilson said It will be quite hidden. She Indicated the Commission recommends the City Attorney review the proposed conditions and criteria. Both Improvements are scheduled for the 1993 spring/summer season, and the canoe rack rental will be reviewed after one season. Hurr asked If there is room for addition*^! racks. Wilson was unsure that there was desired additional racks. room or that the Commission It was moved by Hurr, seconued by Jabbour, to support the recommendation of the Park Commission and authorize tua expansion of Summit Park beach area, and the Installation of a 6-place canoe rack at Summit Park, subject to review after one year, both to be paid tor from Park Dedication Funds. Ayes 4, nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Hurr reported the Board will meet on Wednesday, February 24th. Scheduled is a public hearing for the West Point Homeowners’ Assoc i at i on request i ng a mu 11 i p I e dock license In the City of Tonka Bay, within the limits of the LMCD ordinance. She reported the Committee’s motion to make buoys comply with the polystyrene ordinance deadlines did not pass. She said Lakeside Marina Is advertising boat launching fad I 11ias, which is In viol at ion of the LMCD regulations. Jabbour inquired about covered canopies and tha LMCD restrictions on such. /I J ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OPONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 t LMCD COMMENTS - CONT. Hurr explained they are permitted, but have greater setbacks than docks. Jabbour suggested the LMCD representative relay to the LMCD’s Committee Orono’s position that If polystyrene is not good for the Lake, it Is not good for anyone putting it Into the Lake. Hurr said many feel that the buoys are already encased, but she questioned that fact. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Acting Mayor Goetten, to direct the LMCD representative to state the inconsistencies within the ordinance regarding enforcement of removal of oolystyrene. Ayes 4, nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (««3) t1766/«1786 WILLIAM & RHONDA OMLIE, 1860 SHADYWOOD ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE ~ RESOLUTION #3236 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution • 3236 for Dr. William & Rhonda 0ml le, 1860 Shadywood Road, approving a varianco to allow excess hardcover within the 75-250’ zone, and denying a cond111 ona I use perm 11 to a I Iow tne filling of approximately 300 cubic yards. Ayes 3, nays 0. Goetten abstained. («#4) •1778/#1779 ANDREW GOETTEN, 1385 FOX STREET - SPECIAL LOT COMBINATION - APPROVAL OF LANGUAGE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to approve the language of thu Special Lot Combination Agreement for Andrew Goetten, 1385 Fox Street, which was required as a condition of preliminary plat approval per Resolution #3224. Ayes 3, nays 0. Goetten abstained. € MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 (#5) #1797 TROY ANDERSON, 1490 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3237 Mr. Anderson was present applicant provide screening along the Y®ft property l.ne. The applicant proposes planting along the lot line 8 to 10 tall pyramidal arborvltae, which will grow 6 to 8” per year. Anderson noted the addition is needed as fJ®. beoroom, and this will add two more. He said he ‘ proposed screening with the neighbor to tne west, who seems aQresdbld with the plan. Jabbour felt they should not place a required height on the trees to be planted. Hurr felt they should be at least 6’ tall. Kelley felt If the variance is to be granted, it Is the least the applicant can do to screen It from the most affected property owner. Weckman reported at the last meeting with the applicant and the adjacent property owner. It was understood that the applicant would plant trees 8 to 10' tall. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution #3237 for Application #1797, Troy Anderson, 1490 Long Lake Boulevard, approving a side setback variance to allow the expansion of the existing residence by adding a second story. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*•6) #1798 FRED & BARBARA RYAN, 1345 NORTH ARM DRIVE - VACATION - RESOLUTION #3238 C i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 (*#7) #1799 ALBERT & SALLY HANSER, 1685 FOX STREET - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3239 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution #3239 for Application #1799 Albert and Sally Hanser, 1685 Fox Street, granting a conditional use permit to allow the excavation of a pond, and approval to perform certain land alterations within the drainage easement. Ayes 3, nays 0. Goetten abstained. (#8) #1801 E.W. BLANCH COMPANY, 2505 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE RESOLUTION #3240 Shawn O’Laughlin was present. Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a 2 1/2 story residence with a mansard roof that requires a height variance of 4’10". She reviewed the hardships as presented in the memo. She said if the roof were gabled, the structure would meet the height allowance of 30’. The property abuts the FWBI’s wetland area and will have no Impact on adjacent properties. This is the first variance requested to the newly adopted height ordinance. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, adopting Resolution #3240 for Application #1801 for E.W. Blanch Company, 2505 Old Beach Road, approving a variance to permit the construction of a residence that will be 34’10" in height where only a 30’ height is allowed. Ayes 3, nays 0. Hurr abstained. LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT Rick Perry, Fire Chief, reported he has sent the City a general Information report of fire calls in the month of January and will continue to do so on a monthly basis. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Acting Mayor Goetten advised of the upcoming Highway 12 Corridor meetings; Teclinical Committee meeting, March 2nd, Delano City Hall at 2:00 p.m.; Citizens Committee meeting, March 2, Maple Plain City Hall at 4:00 p.m.: and Policy Committee meeting, March 3rd, Maple Plain City Hall at 5:30 p.m. She said the meetings are scheduled to review the decision process, and added MnDot has started the EIS process. B) Acting Mayor Goetten reported the Hennepin County Commissioners will hold a meeting at Orono City Hall on March 30th from 7:00 to 9:30 p.m. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. C) Jabbour requested staff provide Council with a status report on pending Issues or status of directives by Council. ENGINEER’S REPORT (#9) REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE HORIZONS INC. TO PROCEED WITH TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING WORK Moorse explained this request is to finish the topographic mapping of the City. It was initially estimated to cost approximately one- -thIrd more. Acting Mayor Goetten felt Big Island should be Included. Mabusth stated copies of the mapping are sold for $10.00 per acre. She said this Is the first step In the surface water management plan. Jabbour asked that staff contact MnDot to let them know the Information will be availaole so it will not have to be repeated In the corridor study. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley, to authorize Horizons Inc. to proceed with topographic "tapping work of the City, including Big Island, for an amount not to exceed $34,640.00. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#10) DECLARATION OF VOLUNTEER OF AMERICA WEEK - RESOLUTION #3241 It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3241 declaring Volunteers of America Week to be March 7 through 14, 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#11) REVIEW OF CURRENT CIGARETTE ORDINANCE REGARDING VENDING MACHINE SALES Moorse noted this review was Initiated in response to a request from Mr. Holtz to reconsider allowing vending machines In liquor estabI Ishments. Kelley said he is In favor of less regulations, and doesn’t see this as a problem as minors are prohibited from the establishment. Jabbour concurred. C c i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 CIGARETTE ORDINANCE - CONT. Acting Mayor Goet'qn felt the City should take a leadership role and not allow the .lachlnes. She felt they have made a statement by declaring the City facilities campus no smoking and should continue the effort. Jabbour agreed, but added it is the character of a bar to sell cigarettes. He added this is a revenue generating portion of their operation and the City should not impose an undue hardship. Acting Mayor Goetten said the machines should be placed somewhere in view of an employee and totally within the establishment. Holtz said his machine wi1 I be pIaced 20’ from the door and visible by the bartender. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley, to direct staff to modify the current cigarette ordinance regarding vending machine sales, allowing such machines in liquor establishments where there is a minimum age required by law, subject to the machine being in view of employees of the establishment and within _ _’ of the doorway. She suggested staff recommend a minimum number of feet from the doorway. Ayes 3, nays 1. Goetten voted nay. (#12) CIGARETTE SALES AT MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSES Moorse noted staff does not know how the prohibition of cigarette sales would affect the amount of play. Jabbour felt it inapproprI ate to prohibit the sale of cigarettes in a bar but permit it at a public golf course. Kelley felt it is not appropriate to sell cigarettes at a public course where youth are present. He felt they should try to stimulate youth activities without temptations. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to prohibit the sale of cigarettes at the Orono Golf Course, carrying through on their established policy of having a smoke-free campus. Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour stated he is not on a crusade to stop smoking, but feels it Is wrong for the City to derive profit from the sale of such. Hurr suggested they review the policy on smoking In City-owned vehicIes. i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 (#13) CITY HALL & PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS APPLICATION & CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT #12 Moorse clarified that the construction manager has authorize three subcontractors to be paid below the 10% retalnage. Kelley asked who is responsible for the final inspection of the project. Moorse explained Inspections are conducted by City construct I on manager, and the architect. The arch Itect wlI I do the final inspection and develop a punch list of items to be redone or fixed. Gerhardson noted Department Heads also review this list. Jabbour cautioned staff net to over-ride or direct the architect in any way. Hurr suggested it would be easier to sign off on the entire project at ono time. She asked the criteria for releasing retalnage. Moorse stated the criteria is stated in each contract, and many of these contracts are smaller and have been done for months. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Jabbour, to approve City Hall and Pubic Works Buildings Architect’s Application end Certificate for Payment #1? in the amount of $146,311.05, as presented. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#14) PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE SERVICE EQUIPMENT APPLICATION ft CERTIFICATE #3/FINAL It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Acfng Mayor Goetten, to approve Architect’s Application and Certificate for Payment #3/Final for vehicle service equipment, In the total amount of $8,344.83 to Zahl Equipment Company. Ayes 4, nays 0. Kelley inquired about City staff doing maintenance on City-owned vehicles or police squad cars. Gerhardson stated staff would perform general maintenance and will be reviewing possible service to squad cars In the coming year. (#15) ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR YEAR XIX CDBG PROGRAM It was moved by Acting Mayor Goetten, seconded by Kelley, to estabiish a pubiIc hearing date for Year XIX CDBG Program for March 22, 1993 at 7:30 p.m., and to authorize publication of a partial list of eligible projects. Ayes 4, nays 0. 8 I (,) •• % r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 1993 i CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Theie was no report. (*#17) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, following 1icense: seconded by Kelley, to approve the Kennel License: Kenneth & Karen Holland, 4119 Oak Street Ayes 3, nays 0. Goetten abstained. (*•18) BILLS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, nays 0. Goetten abstained. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Hurr, to adjourn the regular Orono City Council meeting at 8:50 p.m. Ayes 4, nays 0. « Dorothy I I In, City Clerk 'j/ DIann Goe^e/, Acting Mayor r.Planning Ccinr.issicn Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE c/\ V■ ^CITY OF ORONO PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFOR!-L\TION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1 - \ k IrN /1 < • ^ w i V / C ) f <4 ^ Li 4 fl t'-.l -------------------------------------------------------- " fc ’K _ yi • •3 '//•' /*■! J C /ft-' / -v ' C' * • " -V 5 >. Hf/*' ^--------- 04, A * ^ Vo V > ? ^ ^ ^ ^ ,r i Vr<-; -O' 1- r ;'i'5.11^ iI k ^ >j . *''*1 j 6 . ^ , L(MC V . • A . v.ti - . . a . 9 . n - 1 . 1 _ 4. _ a - 7. a . 9. 10. 'i AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1993, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda/Wms are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upoiWafifcauest from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2 Regular Meeting of February 8, 1993 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS 2A. Summit Park Expansion and Canoe Rack LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr Rep. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ** APPLICANTS **Immediately after ‘•he Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute re. lutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 3. #1768/#1786 William and Rhonda Omlie, 1860 Shadywood Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolution 4. I^1778/#1779 Andre’w Goetten, 1385 Fox Street - Revised Variance and Preliminary Plat - Resolutions - Special Lot Combination 5. #1797 Troy Anderson, 1490 Long Lake Boulevard - Variance - Resolution 6. #1798 Fred and Barbara Ryan, 1345 North Arm Drive - Vacation - Resolution . 7. #1799 Albert and Sally Hanser, 1685 Fox Street- Conditional Use Permit Variance - Resolution 8. #1801 E W. Blanch Company, 2505 Old Beach Road - Variance - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT , . u • 9. Request to Authorize Horizons Inc. to Proceed with Topographic Mapping Work CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 10. Resolution Declaring Volunteer of America Week 11! Review of Current Cigarette Ordinance Regarding Vending Machine Sales AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING EET FOR MONDAY, Ff^^RUARY 22, 1993, 7:30 P M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 278C KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued 12. Cigarette Sales at Municipal Golf Course 13. City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application & Certificate of Payment No. 12 14. Public Works Vehicle Service Equipment Application & Certificate #3/Final 16. </Es<*.ablish Public Hearing Date for Year XIX CDBG Program CITT^ ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES* (17*) BILLS (18*) ADJOURNMENT INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 02/22 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. 03/01 Park Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. 03/02 Precinct Caucus Day - No Public Meetings after 7:30 p.m. 03/08 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. 03/15 Planning Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. 03/22 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. ROLL MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETI/<G HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 C/7//*. The Council met on the above date with the following memDers present: Mayor Callahan, CouncIImembers Charles Kelley, J. Diann Goetten, and Gabriel Jabbour. JoEllen Hurr was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Septic Manager Stephen Weckman, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City Engineer Glenn Cook, Police Chief Stephen SuI I I van and City Recorder Terl Naab. Ed Cohen was prese.it to represent the Planning Commission. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten added Item $20. Jabbour added Items #11 and 12. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motion;? for all Items adopted by consent agenda will be included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (*•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to ap^ the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on Ja 25, 1993. Ayes 4 nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Kelley asked If the Coonnlsslon is still working on the bike trail. Gerhardson noted they are and Hennepin County has approved a contract, which the City Attorney will be reviewing, and then a report will be made to the Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT («3) «1768/i1786 WILLIAM & RHONDA OMLIE, 1860 .SHADYWOOD road -(Conditional use permit/variance Rolland Toenges and Ken Larson were present to represent the appiicants. Mabusth reviewed tr.at the applicants seek approval of a hardcover variance In the 75-250' zone, and a conditional use permit for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. The application has been amended by reducing hardcover in the 75-250’ zone from 30.7X to 28.IX, no additional proposed hardcover In the 250-500’ zone, and a reduction to 250-300 cubic yards of fill. Toenges reviewed the event leading to the request of the applicants. He noted they originally had worked with an incorrect survey which lead to incorrect assumptions aboul 'he allowed hardcover. Structural problems with the house forced the project ahead. Larson reviewed the proposal and noted the patio area proposed formerly was a hardcovered area and does not increase hardcover. Jabbour stated the area where the patio is proposed was considered non-StructuraI hardcover, and was never approved by the City. Mabusth noted the structure did meet ail setbacks and did not exceed allowed hardcover stari^^ards. Jabbour asked how the proposed drive is safer than the one approved with the building permit. Larson indicated the proposed drive allows for forward access onto a County Road. He noted his clients wish to create an aesthetleal Iy pleasant entryway. Jabbour felt the original driveway design is safer and he felt the entire reason for the proposed drive is exclusively aesthetics. Larson noted the proposal reduces the slope from the edge of the drive from approximately 4’ to a very small drop to the retaining, waiI area. Goetten felt the turnaround would be safer and easier to use. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILES #1768/#1786 - CONT. Mayor Callahan understood there Is a large volume of traffic on the property. Toenges chirifled that the applicants do entertain frequently and Dr. 0mlle must have easy access from the property In the case of an emergency. Jaobour felt the Island may create more of a hardship In maneuvering the driveway. Kelley stated this Is a classic example of overbuilding on a lot. He noted they proposed five garages, and suggested that one be eliminated. He said planning for this property should have been done prior to application for the permit. Jabbour noted It is up to the applicants to demonstrate a hardship for the granting of the variance. He felt the applicants created the hardship. Toenges stated the hardship has always existed with the access onto the County Road. Mayor Callahan suggested the family Is too large for the lot. Larson Indicated a portion of the hardcover percentage is landscape areas underlain with fabric. He added, the retaining wall and slopage benefits the lower area and the lake by slowing erosion. Mabusth noted staff Issued the building permit and later realized the need for steps which had not been Included, which Increased the approved hardcover by .2*. Goetten stated the appiI cants have made a good faith effort to reduce their proposal. She reiterated a turnaround drive is safer for access. She noted there is no Increase In the 250-500 hardcover. She inquired whether the fabric under the landscape areas could be removed. Larson stated that could be elImlnated which would reduce the hardcover by ipproxImateIy 250 s.f. Jabbour reiterated his approval oi^ the original driveway design approved with the building permit, and felt, if the applicat on is approved as proposed, would set a negative precedent. He felt the project is 100* aesthetic and 0* safety. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILES #1760/t1786 - CONT. Kelley noted even with the originally approved design, hardcover may exceed the allowed by providing the necessary retaining walls. It was moved by Goetten, to approve AppIIcatlons #1768 & #1786 for Dr. William and Rhonda 0mlle. Motion failed due to the lack of a second. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Jabbour, to deny Applications #1768 & #1786 for Dr. William and Rhonda 0ml Ie, due to InsuffI clent hardship. Ayes 3, nays 1. Goetten voted nay. Kelley Inquired to the procedure for the applicants to follow. Mabusth stated they would have to wait six months to submit a new application If hardcover exceeds the allowed. Larson suggested the elimination of the deck to further reduce hardcover. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to reconsider Applications #1768 & #1786. Ayes 4, nays 0. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to approve a variance for Dr. William and Rhonda 0mlle, 1860 Shadywood Road, to allow up to 200 s.f. in excess of the 25.2% approved with the building permit, for the Installation of retaining walls to support the driveway. Ayes 3, nays 1. Goetten voted nay. (#4) i1778/i1779 ANDREW GOETTEN, 1385 FOX STREET - REVISED VARIANCE & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - SPECIAL LOT COMBINATION J. DIann Goetten removed herself from the Council Chambers and any discussion regarding this item. Andrew Goetten was present. Moorse reported on Friday staff received a number of changes to the documents, of which two are substantive: 1. The applicants want to retain the use of the lakeshore outlet which Is to be combined with the vacant lot, untiI such time a residence is built. He noted the code requires a property t^ contain a principal residence prior to an accessory structure. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILES #1778/#1779 - CONT. 2. The applicants want a guarantee that If In the future there are changes In zoning or land use applicable to this property, the special lot combination agreement would remain In force. Moorse stated language can be drafted acceptable to both the applicants and the City. Jabbour felt the Goettens should be allowed use of the riparian outlot as long as all subject property is held in common ownership. He felt It would be unreasonable for the City to force the Goettens to sell the vacant lot so a residence could be built and the outlot used. Mayor Callahan Inquired as to the normal policy on this issue. Mabusth stated the common ownership of the lots makes the request reasonabIe. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconoed by Jabbour, to direct staff to redraft the appropriate resolution and special lot combination for AppiIcatlons #1778 & #1779 for Andrew Goetten, 1385 Fox Street, clarifying the riparian rights issue and guaranteeing future rights of the property, subject to the City Attorney’s review and approval. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#5) #1787 ROBERT L. WAADE, 998 WILDHURST TRAIL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3228 Mr. A Mrs. Robert Waade were present. Mabusth explained this Is a request for a conditional use permit for a non-rental guest apartment. The Planning Commission was concerned that access to the apartment did not meet the standard for access, which must be through the principal structure. The applicants, at that meeting, agreed to relocate a wall making the entrance within the principal structure. She felt the Planning Commission was also concerned with the size and the kitchen within the apartment. She noted the Planning Commission recommended a condition to limit approval to the current owner, requiring any future owner to appear before the Counci I tor approval to continue use or remove the kitchen area. Mr. Waade noted he has built many homes with this type of apartment and has never been asked to limit approval to current owners. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILE #1787 - CONT. Goetten Indicated the City has never requested this type of St IpulatIon. Cohen reiterated the Planning Commission’s concern with the sizfj and kitchen area of the apartment. He felt this would be an Idea rental situation because of the access. Mrs. Waade noted access to the apartment is through the only back doorway to the house. Mabusth said an approval resolution would be filed In the chain of title Indicating conditions of approval. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution 3228 for Application #1787 for Robert L. Waade, 998 Wlldhurst Trail, for a conditional use permit for the construction within the principle residence of a non-rental guest apartment. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#6) #1789 LIBBIE HOPWOOD, 1205 LAKEVIEW AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3229 Britt Goetze, Jr. was present. Mabusth reviewed the original structure was destroyed by a fire, and the applicant seeks an area and setback variances to rebuild within the same building envelope. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution #3229 for Application #1789, LIbble Hopwood, 1205 Lakevlew Avenue, for area and setback variances to construct a new residence. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#7) #1790 MINNETONKA CENTER FOR THE ARTS, 2040 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3230 Mr. Martinson was present. Mabusth stated the applicant seeks a variance because a sign Is considered an accessory structure), and the code requires any signage on a property to support the principal use of the property. The direction sign is to be placed on a residential property. The code does not allow for directional signs. She noted the County has approved the location. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILE #1790 - CONT. Martinson stated the hardship Is the difficultly In directing students unfamiliar with the area. Jabbour felt It better to allow the directional sign than to have vehicles trying to turn around In the area. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3230 for Application #1790 Minnetonka Center for the Arts, 2040 North Shore Drive, for a variance to allow the Installation of a directional sign on a residential property. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#8) #1791 BLAKE BICHANICH, 322 WESTLAKE STREET - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3231 \ Blake BIchanIch was present. Weckman reviewed the two properties are owned In common and the applicant proposes the addition of an entrance to one structure, and a basement to the other. A tower will join the two structures together. The property has been assessed one sewer unit, and connection will be a condition of approval. Goetten asked If the shed In the 0—75’ zone Is movable. She noted the structure Is considered non-conforming. BIchanIch stated that has been there a long time and could not easI Iy be moved. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, adopting Resolution #3231 for Application #1791 for Blake BIchanIch, 322 Westlake Street, approving a side setback variance for the renovation of existing structures, noting the non-conforming status of the structure In the 0-75’ zone. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#9) #1792 DON GRONBERG, 110 LEAF STREET - VARIANCES Mark Gronberg was present. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILE #1792 - CONT. Mabusth explained due to the newly adopted shoreland regulations, the building envelope encroaches the lakeshore protected area. The City has approved a 25’ right-of-way width for Leaf Street, thereby reducing the street setback. She noted during the Planning Commission review there was discussion of the ponding area and Mr. Gronberg suggested that If the dam were removed, the setback would be met. She Indicated It Is unlikely the dam wlI I ever be removed. She noted the c'.eck is proposed at 26’ from the lakeshore, and 55’ for the principal structure. The footprint of the house is 3,700 s.f., which Is well above the average in the neighborhood. Mayor Callahan asked If it were possible to locate the house on the lot meeting the lakeshore setback. Gronberg noted other properties along Leaf Street have provided the 33’ right-of-way, thus making those homes 8’ further back on the property than this one wlI I be. He stated the house Is 2,200 s.f. plus the garage and deck areas. He noted the setbacks of other houses along the creek. He added the DNR’s recommendation was a 50’ setback. Jabbour noted the DNR recommended a 50’ setback for the entire lake area, but Orono felt a 75’ setback was more beneficial. Goetten Inquired how much further back the house would have to be to meet the setback. Jabbour stated this area Is zoned 2 acre minimum to accommodate septic requIrements, but since sewer Is provided, he felt It would be better to reduce the side lot line, and maintain the required lakeshore setback. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, second*. J by Goetten, to table Application #1792 for Don Gronberg, 110 Leaf Street, to allow the applicant time to reconsider his proposal. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#10) #1795 LUANN WALTERS, 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LuAnn Walters, Cliff Otten and Doug Otten were present. 8 MliW'MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993ZONING FILE #1795 - CONT.Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a day care center with limited catering. The applicant has expanded the proposal to 70 student/teacher limit. The number of persons allowed will be limited by State allowances, the water use and the limitations of the septic system. The City Engineer has recommended traffic flow to the outer edge of the property, but the applicant was concerned with that pattern and has p«*oposed parking spaces, with no drop off area. The County has encouraged access to the property further to the east along County Road 6, and the County does not want to encourage parking spaces established along the rlght-of- way/property line. She noted water usage will be monitored through a meter. She noted the applicant has provided for 13 parking spaces, but only 8 are required. Kelley stated he felt the site unsafe for a day care. He felt this represents an Intensification of the original use. Jabbour said it Is a permitted use In this zone. Kelley indicated this Is a dangerous situation and he could not approve it because of health, safety and the welfare reasons. He felt the area Is not suitable for a day care. Cliff Otten stated he thinks the proposal will work. He noted the stop light slowing traffic down. He stated the parking as proposed provides for a parent to drop off their child, and they propose a large fenced outside play area. Walters noted because of the pre-school situation that they propose, people coming and going wlI I be staggered throughout the day. Otten staled he understands why the County cannot approve the additional parking along the lot line, but the area will still be available. He noted It will only take 2-3 minutes per parent to drop off their child. Kelley took exception to that statement. He suggested additional parking will be needed as parents do not just drop off their children, and tend to take a little time to discuss the day or necessary needs with the provider. Walters stated 70 people at the center would be the maximum allowed, but she does not anticipate that many people there at one time. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OROHO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILE #1795 - CONT. Habusth stated the County is reviewing the speed in the area to determine if it needs to be reduced. Kelley asked if they would have a latch key program with buses dropping off children. Walters stated if that were available, she would want the bus to drop off the children on County Road 6, with staff available to greet the chI Idren. Mayor Callahan clarified that there will probably be 3-4 traffic movements on the property during the day. Walters stated there actually would be more like 6-8 patterns. She said she hopes to have the same amount of children in each program to eliminate congestion. Mayor Callahan stated it seems like there will be a constant pattern of traffic, avoiding concentration. He asked If the children would be allowed to play outside. Walters explained they plan a fenced play area off the back door. She felt the woods on the property would provide a wonderful area for exploring. Screening would be provided from Highway 12 for the play area. Often noted the need for an alternate septic site would determine If there is room for expansion of the play area. Kelley asked if the building will be sprinkled. Mabusth reported at the point of 29 students and/or teachers, the Fire Code requires the building to be sprinkled. Often noted that provision is being Incorporated with the renovation of the building. Jabbour asked If there Is an acceptable number of persons for the appiI cant. Often noted the plan proposed Is from a 1980 site plan. He said no one In the past has put the kind of money necessary Into the property to Improve it, but to do so, one must use It to Its capacity. He stated there are some unknown costs associated with the project, and therefore It Is difficult to determine the mininiuin number of people that would be acceptable. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILE #1795 - CONT. Goetten stated she would love to have the property utilized. She cautioned that the City needs to proceed carefully. She asked that the Council be better Informed about safety issues and a IternatIves. Otten stated they have met or exceeded the requirements. Ho asked that Council give them direction. Kelley asked that comparative studies be done and presented. He suggested that a separate employee parking area be provid id. away from the building. He asked that the play area be moved or v Mned very well from Highway 12. He asked that lighting be address.>sj, and questioned the size of the entry to the property. Jabbour suggested the City not be Involved In areas monitored by the State. Mabusth asked their opinion on the catering service. She noted a kitchen is necessary to provide meals for the children, and the catering service is a now pattern In day cares, providing families a convenience. Walters explained the time after the children are picked up from the day care is very crucial for f£ur«l I ios, and providing dinner may help to ease that situation. She noted they do not intend to collect money at the door but would provide for alternate methods of payment. Jabbour stated If the catering Is not a function of the day care, the Council may not be permitted to approve the use. Otten stated the catering service would be the first thing eliminated if found that it was taxing the septic system. Walters requested that Council act on the request to enable her to seek approval from the other necessary agencies. Mayor CaI Iahan announced that If the Council Is satisfied about the safety features, the concept seems agreeable. Kelley agreed, but added he may not approve that many people. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table Application #1795 LuAnn Walters, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard, to allow the applicant additional time to supply the additional Information relating to the issues raised. Ayes 4, nays 0. MlhriTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILE #1795 - CONT. Mayor Callahan suggested the applicant direct the safety concerns of the City Engineer. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Mayor Callahan moved Item #17 to this section of the meeting and suggested the City reactivate the Lake Use Committee to officially represent the City In working with the DNR In the development of the plans for the Maxwell Bay access. He recommended Goetten be nominated as Chair, Kelley as Vice Chair, and nominated the following Planning Corranlsslon members: Schrc*tder, Bellows and Rowlette to the Committee contingent upon their approval to serve on the Committee. B) Mayor Callahan expressed the Council’s best wishes to Linda Walters, of the City staff, who Is In the hospital under going major surgery. C) Mayor Callahan referred to a request by Janet Haugland to support her seeking a position with the Metropolitan Council. Goetten noted Hurr is considering the position also. D) Jabbour referrsd to an article pubiI shed in the Weekly newspaper In which they quoted Hurr at a LMCD meeting as stating a desire to serve the remainder of her term as LMCD representative of the City. He said he discussed the issue with Hurr who Indicated she wishes to attend the meetings to protect Orono’s Interest, but is supportive of tne Council’s decision with regard to the LMCD. E) Jabbour asked the City to consider establishing a program to inspect sump pumps in the City to unsure they are not dumping into the sewer system. Gerhardson said staff has already started to discuss this program. ENGINEER’S REPORT PAY REQUEST #4 HIGHWAY 12 WATER TOWER It was moved by Goetten, seconded oy Jabbour, to authorize Pay request #4 to be paid to PDM, Inc., in the amount of $94,767.25. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*i12) PAY REQUEST #5 STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize Pay Request #5, Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer, to be paid to Progressive Contractors, Inc., In the amount of $90,600.17. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORCNO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 19D3 (#13) HIGHWAY 12 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS UPDATE Cook reported there are three issues: the safety Issue, upgrade to Willow Drive, and the temporary signal at Willow Drive and Highway 12. He Indicated MnDot has said the safety Improvements are scheduled for 1995, which means the signal light will not be realized until then. He noted accidents during the three years prior to 1992 averaged six per year, with two of those involving injuries to passengers. In 1992 there were fourteen accidents. Mayor Callahan noted MnDot does not encourage the use of City funding to install the signal. Gerhardson said the City of Long Lake was wlI Iing to help fund the temporary signal, but may not be in a financial position to do so at this time. The State has determined a need for the signal, and have approved conceptual plans including the signal and turn lanes. Kelley asked at what point the City could close Willow Drive. Gerhardson stated the north and south frontage roads would need to he In place prior to that closing. Kelley suggested prohibiting crossing of lanes on Highway 12. Cook stated that would be difficult to accomplish. Mayor Callahan directed staff suggest ions. return with alternative Cook noted a pathway along Willow Drive is proposed by the City, therefore, It Is recommendoo to reduce the right-of-way acquisition needed, an urban section be coiistructed the entire length of the roadway. This would reduce the total width of the roadway and would better maintain existing vegetation and trees. Mayor Callahan asked If they are ready to proceed with this Improvement. Gerhardson noted the feasibility study is complete with the exception of the urban section costs. Kelley asked why Willow Drive is proposed to be upgraded. Gerhardson stated Willow Drive Is a MSA road, and improvements are needed due to the anticipated development along the roadway and the fact th»» road Is not bui It for 9 ton trucks. Ho noted there Is enough MJA funds to do the bike path along Old Crystal Bay Road and the other projects on the list. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 HIGHWAY 12 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS UPDATE - CONT. Mayor Callahan suggested staff present a proposal at the next meet Ing. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT («14) CABLE COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - ADDITION TO RESOLUTION #3227 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to appoint Hurr to the Cable Commission for 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to appoint Tim Pattrin to the Cable Commission for 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. to adopt ascd for (#15) TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY - RESOLUTION #3232 It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, Resolution #3232 authorizing tax forfeited land rel private sale to adjacent owners. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#16) CITY FACILITIES CHANGE ORDERS Moorse reviewed the three change orders IIsted In the memo. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to approve the change orders as presented In the memo dated February 2, 19i;3. Ayes 4, nays 0. Moorse referred to the budget update Included, which Indicates a reriucod contingency fund due to the amount paid for SAC charges. Jabbour said during the process, he was Informed that a generator connected to natural gas was not feasible as funding from Emergency Preparedness could not ba used then. He noted a generator was installed using natural gas. Gerhardson said the City was granted a variance from the State Electrical Board. Moorse noted the generator meets the needs of the Police Department for their emergency operations center. Sullivan noted he Is unaware of any funding available through Emergency Preparedness to pay for the generator. Jabbour said when he makes a decision It Is usually based on staff input and reiterated the necessity for that Information to be correct. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 (t17) LAKE USE COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - MAXWELL BAY ACCESS OVERSITE This Item was discussed under the Mayor/CouncI I report. (•18) JOINT DEFENSE OF THE LAWSUIT BROUGHT AGAINST THE MPRS • ITS MEMBER CITIES - RESOLUTION #3233 Moorse reported this Issue involves two discrimination lawsuits filed against the MPRS. Holmes & Graven will be providing the joint defense. This firm has been active with the MPRS since Its Inception. Kelley asked if the City is taking the position of the Joint powers organization by authorizing payment of the defense. Moorse said the City Is taking the same position as the Joint powers organization. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution #3233 authorizing Holmes 4 Graven to represent the City of Orono in lawsuits commenced by John Starks and Christopher Fields. Ayes 4, nays 0. (♦19) VOICE & DATA CABLING CONTRACT PAYMENT 92 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to authorize the City to pay $6,587.00 for voice and data cabling. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*•20) DESIGNATION OF THE NEW CITY FACILITIES AS "SMOKE-FREE" - RESOLUTION •3234 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution • 3234 dec IarIng the new City facilities to be smoke free bulidIngs. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•21) OFFICE FURNITURE PAYMENT «1 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to authorize payment of $60,680.57 for office furniture. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•22) PAY REQUEST •2/FINAL - PUMP & METER SERVICE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to authorize Pay Request •2/final to Pump and Meter Service for the installation of the hoist at the new Public Works facility In the amount of $5,545.53. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8. 1993 (»23) STUBBS BAY SEWER FEES Moorse explained the Council agreed to allow residents up to five years to connect to the sewer system if they could prove they have an acceptable septic system. It was determined that after a 16 month period, the City would charge an availability charge, which does not Include the M.W.C.C.’s portion of the sewer rate. Jabbour noted a portion of the sewer charge Is retained In a fund for future maintenance of the system. That is the portion of the charge which unconnected Stubbs Bay citizens will be required to pay. He felt this should be explained better In the letter to the residents. He added, the letter should not? this Is the first time the 16 month deadline for connection has been waived and the fee reduced. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to direct staff to amend the letter to Include the Justification and explanation of the charge, and to authorize the amended letter to be sent to the Stubbs Bay area property owners. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*•24) SEASONAL WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS - RESOLUTION #3235 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3235 establishing the 1993 weight limits for City streets from March 15 through May 15, 1393. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#25) SALARY ADJUSTMENT OFFICER IRVING ENGLISH It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to increase Officer Irving English’s salary from $10,367 per hour to $18,724 per hour as of February 11, 1993, as per the 1992 LELS contract currently In effect. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT There was no report. («#26) LICENSES It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, following I I censes: to approve the Annual Home Occupation License: Russell Norum, 3264 North Shore Drive Cigarette License: John Downey, Wayzata Country Club John O’Sullivan, O’Sullivans Don Scherven, Navarro Lanes Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8. 1993 (»»27) BILLS It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve payment of the AlI Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. OTHER Marge Gasch asked that Council give direction to her In her pursuit to preserve the Council Chambers. Mayor Callahan noted there are others interested in using the facility, and suggested ail Interested parties contact Moorse. He added, an article should be published in the newspaper allowing for all citizens to express their ideas on the Issue. Mayor Callahan inquired about the police contract with Minnetonka Beach. Sullivan noted there Is no concern on the part of Minnetonka Beach to not continue the contract for 1993, but they have expressed a desire to have a meeting of all contract cities to discuss Issues with regard to future contracts. He noted all contract cities have the same basic contract, which is very difficult to understand and difficult to determine actual cost. Kelley asked If they have a cost accounting system to Justify charges to contract cit es. Sullivan noted they do but there are still problems In determining charges. It was determined that a joint meeting of contractual cities would be beneficIal. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adjourn the regular Orono City Council meeting at 11:23 p.m. Ayes 4, nays 0. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hal I in, City Clerk COUNCinHEEnNG TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administration John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Directo February 18, 1993 i EB 2 2 1993 CITYOFORONO SUBJECT: Summit Park Swimming Beach Expansion and Canoe Rack Over the past few months the Park Commission has been considering the installation of a canoe rack at Summit Park Swimming Beach, as well as expanding the size of the controlled area of the swimming beach. The canoe rack is being proposed due to 3 request from residents who do not live on the lake but enjoy canoeing and do not wish to transport their canoes each time they wish to canoe. The Park Commission is proposing a 4-6 place rack to be installed at the northeast corner of the property. I have attached information from the Park Commission on the above matter. The Park Commission invited the neighbors of the park to the February Park Commission meeting to receive their comments. One resident appeared and was only concerned about increased use of the swimming beach and the location of the canoe rack. TO:Richard Flint, Chair and Park Commission Member PROM:John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:January 27, 1993 SUBJECT:Summit Park Swim Beach Expansion and Canoe Rack Installation Attached for review and discussion is the previous correspondence regarding the expansion of the swimming beach at Summit Park Swimming Beach and information regarding the installation of a 4-6 place canoe rack. 1. Memo to Park Commission for November 1992 meeting. 2. Survey of land parcel.y 3. Swimiming beach, dock and buoy layout. 4. City of Plymouth canoe rack permit application. 5. Information from Susan Wilson November 1992 meeting. 6. Copy of letter to one of the residents. 1 m TO:Park Commission Members FROM:John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:October 28, 1992 SUBJECT: Canoe Rack Summit 3each And Swimming Beach Expansion Attached for review is a copy of the survey of Summit Park Swimming Beach. I have indicated with an "X" the two locations for consideration of the cance racks. Susan Wilson will discuss this matter in more detail during the meeting. Also attached is a sketch of the dock and buoy layout of the existing beach area. It is the intention to expand this area for next summer. The expansion would be directed to the east approximately half again as much as what is there now. The cost for additional buoys amounts to $1,700.00. , r PLYMOUTH PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Ph. 550-5130 CANOE RACK RENTAL INFORMATION To all canoe rack rental applicants; Enclosed is an application card for canoe rack assignments. PLYMOUTH residents are invited to apply for a canoe rack rental space at either Parkers Lake Beach or Medicine Lake's East Beach, beginning Mav 7. Spaces will be available for use from May 15- "SepTember 30 for a fof 5^5 per space for residents. Non­ residents may apply beginning May 13 at a fee of $40 per space. Renters must provide their own locks and must accept all responsibility for vandalism or loss. For more information, call 550-5130. All watercraft used in the State of Minnesota must be registered with the State. Call 296-2316 to request an application if you haven't already registered your canoe. The Plymouth Park and Recreation Department will recognize only the person whose signature appears on the application card as being the responsible holder of said rack. At no time, may this individual sub-lease or receive remuneration for the use of leased rack without acquiring authorization from the Park and Recreation Dept. Rental to Bona Fide Canoe Owners Only No permit shall b* issued to anyone except a bona fide canoe owner who certifies on the card provided that the address stated is his/her legal residence and that the canoe to be registered is seaworthy. Suitable identification of the canoe must be stated on the card, including color and manufacturer's number, if at all possible. Owner must also furnish Minnesota State Watercraft registration number, in additioi. to driver's license number, if applicable. Life Preservers Each occupant must carry at least one Coast Guard floatation device at all times while on board canoe. approved Removal of Craft at Season's End All canoes must be removed from rack no later than October 15. Securing of Craft It is mandatory that your craft be secured by your own device to the assigned rack at BOTH the front and rear. This is to prevent the canoe from coming loose during high winds. If this should occur, damage to other canoes would be considered the liability of the rack holder. cfPECIAL NOTICE CANOES Still on racks after October 15 may be minimum service charge of $50 will be required reclaim their watercraft. impounded. A for owners to FURTHER, in order to provide protected storage space, such impoundment will include a minimum fee of $10 per month for each month following impoundment. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT RACKS BE VACATED ON TIME- 5,4. . ». ..^ . V^.. ^{t: ^ V . ^ •f* ---ff* ■..,,, ,v. V--;.,: i ..;.>-^,T-jsj«^«S»sgaSMg Name "'>; mV a........, j^.|*y .. .■ . ;.‘I ^ •• ■ V^';\ni'3^ 21p Driver's Licence # ■ ' (Bus.)a... ^. •Phone i (Home)____ r» •• -r I • •• . •; «•:•*•.•;•,;••■•■ ^ . •Name of Canoe ♦ • . -; ^■ •-- Factory Nuraber_ Color • ’ r. .. • • ■ . ■, « ’• ■ • , ■V . *'• 1*^ i:/.Length MN Watercraft Reg City Resident Yas Fee Enclosed • ' * *. S1anature ft R^/'i - ;• •• - r.,.. * • *1 •<r*r '.•■jijg j-' •4 . • 4 ' - - • ■.‘T v /—-» - . ‘* ■ * '"■ * .**• •-»V ** I Rent?) Canoe Racks at Summit Park 1- Check ordinances with village attorney - no apparent problems 2” Newspaper ad in the spring announcing availability of six canoe racks at Summit Park Month of April for registration Village residents havc^ _tipst"chcince for^two-weeks therrr1ropefTS~to property owners; 3- The six racks are available for use from May 1 till October 15 4- The fee is proposed at the same as Plymouth S- The hours for use of canoes is dawn to dusk providing no problems occur 6- a policy statement similar to that of Plymouth will be seat to all applicants with a registration card. 7- a sign will be posted by the canoe launching designating canoe launching only. 8- Canoe launching site will be located at the East end of Summit Park to keep it separated from the swimming beach. Parking will be in the designated lot only. 9- The estimated cost of building a rack would be $350 if done in house $500 if done outside. /O Beach Expansion at Summit Park Enlarge the existing Beach 1/3 - adding 15 yds to existing 30yds) Added buoys - $ 1700 Added sand and labor - $237.60 leave the dock situation the same for the next year Subcorrirnitteee recommends expansion of Summit Beach and the addition of 6 canoe racks for rent at the east end of the Park to be ready for the summer season 1993 at a cost of $2500. C .T ------♦/ !PLiu MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 1993 ATTENDANCE 7:13 P.M. The Park Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Susan Wilson, Sherokee 11se and Li I I McMillan. Alex Vongries and Robert Howells were absent. John Gerhardson, Public Works Director, represented City staff. An Information discussion was held from 7:13 to 8:05 p.m. due to the lack of a quorum. At 8:05 Chair Dick Flint arrived. (#1) APPROVAL OF MINUTES McMillan asked that Page 2, Paragraph 6, be changed to read: “Hennepin Parks will be given a non-exc1 us Ive easement over the trail"; and Page 3, Item #11, "monitoring usage of parks". It was moved by Wilson, seconded by Ilse, to approve the minutes of the January 4, 1993 Park Commission meeting as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#2) SUMMIT BEACH IMPROVEMENTS AND CANOE RACKS Gerhardson explained the Intention of the Park Commission Is to double the size of the swimming beach. The major concjtrn Is the loss of willow trees to allow for the expansion. Ho ir'inrwed the Installation of a canoe rack, to be rented by residents of the communIty. Dick Reed. 1000 Ola Long Lake Road, said when ho purchased his property ho was told unofficially that this beach was strictly for swimming, and no boat launching would be allowed. He expressed concern about additional lighting that may bo needed for security reasons for the canoe rack area. He said ho did not want the beach expanded. He felt the enlarged parking area at the beach took away some of the beauty and value of the park. He reported that Bruce Dayton, donator of the property, did not have any objection to either the canoe rack or the expansion of the beach area. Wilson explained their Interest to expand the beach area as Orono does not many good swimming beaches. The canoe rack was requested by residents. The Commission Is Interested In promoting quiet water activities. She felt additional lighting would not be necessary. She said If there are any problems In the future, the canoe rack could be removed. Reed stated he was concerned that the canoe rack would be placed near his property line. Wilson stated they wanted to keep the rack as far as possible from the swimming beach. r MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 1993 SUMMIT BEACH - CONT. Gerhardson noted he has not received any other comments from neighboring property owners. Mr. and Mrs. Phi I I Ip Bradley arrived to Inspect the new fad Iities. The Commission recessed for a short time. All members felt the beach should be enlarged to make a safer play area for chI Idren. Wilson stated the estimated cost for the canoe rack Is $350 If built In-house, $500 If purchased already built. She said there may be some additional costs to clear the brush In the area prior to InstalI at Ion of the rack. She suggested directing the sub-committee (Wilson, McMillan and Howells) to review details pertaining to the beach. She felt the rack should bo built to hold six canoes. It was suggested that $40.00 be charged for the rental of a rack per year. The Commission reviewed the dates that the rack will be available and hours that canoes can be launched from the beach. Wilson said she requested the hours for use of canoes be extended from dawn to dusk to allow additional time for people to enjoy their sport. They reviewed tSe hours posted for park use. McMillan suggested the hours of use be limited to “day light hours". She questloned the need for the City Attorney to review the contract and waiver. She suggested an annual review of the canoe rack rental. Use felt a sign indicating “canoe launching" should be posted. McMillan asked If the neighbor to the west of the park has been not If(ed. Gerhardson said they were not notified as they are residents of Long Lake. Wilson suggested the rack be In place by April. Use clarified that the rack rental will only be available to residents of the City. Wilson suggested advertising the aval IablI Ity of canoe rack rental in the local newspaper and newsletter. Chair Flint arrived at this time, 8:05 p.m. !E MJL '^ ij MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 1993 SUMMIT BEACH - CONT. It was moved by Wilson, seconded by McMillan, to recommend to expand Summit Beach by SOX for the summer season 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. It was moved by Wilson, seconded by McMillan, to recommend the Installation of a six place canoe rack at the east end of Summit Park for the 1993 season, with the proposed rules and regulations, to be reviewed on an annual basis. Ayes 4, nays 0. PARK MONITORING Ilse reviewed that the Commission at their last meeting decided to establish a monitoring program of the parks and their use. She submitted a draft form to be filled In by the person monitoring, and reviewed the Information requested on the form. She noted at the next meeting, the Park Commission members will be assigned a specific park to monitor. (#3) REVIEW & APPROVAL OF 1993 ACTION PLAN Gerhardson referred to the schedule regarding the bIke/hIke trail. He suggested presenting the contract at the February 22nd meeting, but prior to that he and Chair Flint would meet with Tom Barrett, City Attorney. Chair Flint noted they need to develop the documents for the easements to be granted for the additional right-of-way. McMillan questioned the source of funding. Gerhardson noted the Council will need to determine funding very soon. Wilson clarified that the Commission agreed that OBA could remove the Items from Bederwood Park as they wished. Ilse said the City may want to replace some of the benches at the park. McMillan questioned whether OBA would bo removing the side fence. Ilse felt, without the fence, more versatility Is provided for the use of the park. They discussed several possibilities for the Crystal Bay site. It was suggested that a survey be done of the property. MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 1993 1993 ACTION PLAN - CONT. Chair Flint felt they should continue to pursue an updated comprehensive park plan. Wilson was opposed to paying a planner to work on a comprehensive plan. She felt the Commission members knew Orono much better and could do the work. McMillan Inquired about the update of park equloment for the Navarre park. Chair Flint noted that can be discussed at the June tour. Wilson discussed the sewer pond and the issue of raising the water level. She Informed the Commission that If there are muskrats In the pond, they will get rid of the cattails, which In turn will enable the water level to rise. They discussed the different options of seeding the area and mr:intenance of a trail. Wilson noted the sub-committee will return with a recommendation on the type of grass to be planned at the March meeting of the Park Commission. It was moved by Ilse, seconded by Wilson, to approve the 1993 Action Plan of the Park Commission as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Gerhardson noted that Long Lake may be interested In establishing bike/hike trails that may connect with trails In Orono. He said he would follow up on that issue. McMillan mentioned there Is an organized cross country ski event scheduled for Wednesday evening at Orono Golf Course. (#4) REVIEW CASCO POINT PARK DEED TO DETERMINE RESTRICTIONS Wilson reviewed that the Commission had considered adding some trails through the woodland area. Gerhardson suggested dIscussIng the InstallatIon of trails with the neighbors. Wilson asked who currently maintains the property. 'lerhardson said the City does the maintenance work, and they could cut more trails If that Is deemed appropriate. •p I ' L; MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 1993 CASCO POINT PARK - CONT. McMillan reported she discussed the property with the son of one of the original deedors, who Indicated that they are very adamant about keeping the area very natural and open space. Chair Flint stated they may want to discuss the time limit on the deed restrictions with the City Attorney. Wilson felt the area should be left In a natural state, but perhaos enhance the walking trails. ^ rnaps McMillan felt the decision should be made by the neighborhood. Chair Flint said they would revisit the Issue at the June tour of the parks. ADJOURNMENT Chair Flint adjourned the regular meeting of the Park Comet!ssfon at 9:20 p.m. The next meeting will be Monday, March 1, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. Richard Flint, Chair Person Jl -1 I " ^ TO: % %'^45 FROM: DATE: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator ^'^3^ February 17, 1993 Of, SUBJECT: #1768/1786 Dr. William R. and Rhonda T. Omlie, 1860 Shady wood Road - Variances - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution At the February 8th meeting of the Council, Council moved to approve a hardcover variance allowing an excess of 200 s.f. hardcover over the approved 25.2% with building permit. The additional hardcover was to allow the installation of retaining walls to sustain steep elevations adjacent to driveway turnaround appros ’ed with building permit. Hardcover within the 75-250 ’ setback area is approved as follows; House = 2,930 s.f. Garage = 815 s.f. Driveway = 1,755 s.f. Sidewalk = 150 s.f. Steps = 39 s.f. Patio area = 300 s.f. Retaining walls = 200 s.f. Total hardcover = 6,189 s.f. or 26% Existing hardcover = 59.89 s.f. or 25.2% Variance = 200 s.f. or .8% The Council denied the conditional use pennit that would allow filling of approximately 250-300 cubic yards of fill to allow for paving expansions within 75-250 ’ setback area. Per the Council ’s direction the enclosed resolution has been drafted approving a hardcover variance of 26% within the 75-250 ’ setback area and denying the conditional use permit for the additional fill and paving improvements. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 21 FILE #1768/1786 WHEREAS, Dr. William R. and Rhonda T. Cmlie (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1860 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City') and legally described as follows: Lot 27 except the North 15', said 15' being measured at right angles from the north line of said lot, and Lot 20, Shadywood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow hardcover improvements in excess of the allowed 25% within the 75-250' setback area consisting of retaining walls, driveway and turnaround expansions, deck, patio and landscape fabric and a conditional use permit for the filling of approximately 300 cubre yards to allow for the expanded drive and turnaround area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1.This comprehensive application was reviewed under Zoning File #1768 and #1786. 2.The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, requiring 1/2 acre in area or 21,780 s.f. The property consists of 39,300 s.f. or .9 acre. 3.On November 9, 1992 the Council approved Resolution #3198 as part of the comprehensive review of Application #1768 allowing for a side setback variance to permit the construction of a 13'8" x 21'2" garage addition located Page 1 of 6 1 8'9” from the north side lot line instead of the required 10' . 4. The Orono Council reviewed this application on December 14, 1992 and February 8, 1993 and conceptually approved the variance as amended to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and recommended denial of the conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 based on one or more of the following findings: A) Approval of the hardcover variance. 1. The additional hardcover will allow for the installation of retaining walls to prevent erosion of the steeper slopes adjacent to the turnaround approved wich the building permit. 2. The more gentle sloped area resulting from the installation of retaining walls will provide permanent stability and prevent erosion of sediment in runoff that will eventually drain into lake. 3. There is no hardcover within the 0-75-' setback area. 4. There is no increase in hardcover proposed within the 250-500' setback area. Hardcover remains at 31.4%. 5. Property contains a grassed drainageway that provides treatment for the surface runoff from the immediate watershed. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adver‘»ely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a Page 2 of 6 demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. B) Denial of conditional use permit: 1. The original driveway plan approved with the building permit was deemed to be safe and the proposed drive requiring additional fill was based on aesthetics and not safety. 2. The need to access property in times of emergency can be accomplished by a mere efficient use of the existing garage facilities on the property. 3. \pproval of a conditional use permit that would result in excesses of hardcover on a property that already exceeds allowed hardcover within the 75-250' setback area would establish a negative precedent. 4. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the filling of approximately 300 s.f. of fill for paving improvements would be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, and will depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property would not be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDEl. *ND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of tiic above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow an increase of 200 s.f. of hardcover improvements for retaining vails to be installed adjacent to an approved turnaround resulting in 6,189 s.f. or 26% hardcover Page 3 of 6 in the 75-250' setback area where 5,989 s.f. or 25.2% exists and denies a conditional use permit for filling of approximately 300 cubic yards of fill subject to the following conditions: 1.Prior to the installation of the retaining walls adjacent to approved turnaround, applicants shall apply for an amendment to the original building permit issued for new construction providing a landscape/grading plan locating retaining wall=! and any other information requested by Building Department. 2.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for an amended building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (February 22, 1994). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3 .The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of February, 1993. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahar Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of February, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, r.ayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 5 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and a<”knowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free a't and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOT.^ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 ]3efore me a Notary Pv.blic within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) descrioed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PLTBLIC Page 6 of 6 TO: DATE: ll Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administratoi COUNCIL MEETING PEB 2 2 1993 CITY OF ORONO February 19, 1993 SUBJECT: ^1778/1779 Andrew Goetten, 1385 Fox Street - Revised Variance/Preliminary Plat Resolutions - Special Lx)t Combination The variance and preliminary plat resolutions have been revised per applicant ’s requests, which Council agreed to on Februar>' 8th (copies attached). The special lot combination language is as of this writing still under discussion by the applicant ’s attorney and the City Attorney. If agreement is reached by Monday afternoon, the final language will be presented to Council for approval. ch /o, o Vt. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) AND 10.03, SUBDIVISION 6 (B), AND TO MUNICIPAL SUBDIVISION CODE SECTIONS 11.10. SUBDIVISION 14 AND 11.03, SUBDIVISION 2, (24) •:iLE #1778 WHEREAS, Andrew J. Goetten (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1385 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Secticn 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) and i0.03, Subdivision 6 (B) , and to Municipal Subdivision Code Sections 11.10, Subdivision 14 and 11.03, Subdivision 2, (24), to permit the subdivision of the property into two building lots, pursuant to the provisions of Resolution #1178 in order tn carry out the purpose and the intent thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. 2. Findings This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1778. The property is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District, requiring 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land in each building lot per Municipal Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B). 3 .The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 16, 1992 and on a vote of 6 in favor, 0 against, recommended that the property, comprising just over 3 acres in contiguous dry buildable area, be rezoned to a 1 acre standard in conjunction with a general 7 O . O CITY of ORONO RESOLLTIOiS OF THE Cll V COUNCIL NO __________________ necessary 4 .The City Council reviewed this application on December 14, 1992 and considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, verbal and written comments by the applicant and his attorney, and the effect of the proposed vaiiance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. On December 14, 1992, the City Council voted 3 in favor, 1 against, with 1 abstention, to grant approva'. of the variance as requested by the applicant and direct staff to draft a resolution for approval. 5.On January 11, 1993 the applicant revised his request by requesting that the initially proposed lot line be moved westward, leaving 1.23 acres in Lot 2 and leaving Lot 1 with 1.78 acres plus 0.23 acres credit from Outlot A for a total of 2.01 acres. The Council finds that granting a variance to allow such credit is in keeping with the unique circumstances of Resolution #1178. The Council hereby determines that Resolution •#1178 establishes a unique contract between the City and the applicant and the Council further finds that, whether or not said contract is legally enforceable, the unique circumstances surrounding Resolution #1178 and the subsequent placement of the MUSA boundary establish the clear intent of a past City Council which the current City Council intends to uphold. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grant variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.28, Subdivision S (B) and 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) and variances to Subdivision Code Sections 11.10, Subdivision 14 and 11.03, Subdivision 2, (24) to permit the subdivision of the applicant's property to create a 1.23 acj-e lot with the existing residence and a 2+ acre new building site in the RR-IB Zoning District using non­ contiguous acreage where each lot would normally be required to contain at lease two acres of contiguous area, subject to the following conditions: Pace 2 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. 2 . 3 . January ATTEST: Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a subdivision within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (January 11, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned ajjplicant has read, understood and hereby aarees tc the teims of this resolution and on behalf of himself, hJ.s heirs, successors and assigns, hereby_agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain or title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of 1993*. CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATS OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing inscrument was acknowlodged before me on this 11th day of January, 1993 , by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayer & City Clerk of the City of Orono_, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executea on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 1 • \ & I 4^// CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. before^me a Notary PublTc wYthin and for said councy, personally appeared ----------^T^^>-er^n —aesc'-ibed in and who executed tne Soing”rns\"r^men\^r Ind'acicnowledged that ht (they) executed the same as his (their) tree act and aee... 199 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. a Notary Pu -HTTc tYt "1 and for sard coJHt77-?irsonally sppssrsd - --—^^_ (<3 \ bsd in and who exvcutsd -h0 fo«go'ng"ins-!r^ment Ld ac)tnowledge‘d that he (they) executed the same ai his (their) free act and deed. 199 NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 r EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows; Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 3 aforesaid ar;d running thence East 720 feet to the Northerly line or side of right of way of the Minnetonka Branch of the Great Northern Railway, thence Southwesterly along the Northerly line on side of said right of way, 827.05 feet to the West line of_ Lot 3 aforesaid; thence North 423.1 feet to place oii beginning, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by ^j^ree judicial landmarks placed at the most Easterly corner of said tract of land at a point in the Southwesterly line and at a point in the North line where said lines are intersected respectively by a line p3jfaXlel to and 33 feet east of the West line of said lot. Also that part of the West 33 feet of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying Southerly of County Road No. 7, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by four judicial landmarks placed at the Northwest corner and the Northeast corner, respectively, of said tract of land, and at a point in the Westerly line thereof 280.3 feet South along said line from said Northwesi,erly corner, and in th-^ East line thereof at a point 275.4 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 138b FOX STREET - FILE NO. 1779 WHEREAS, Andrew J. Goetten, on October 23, 1992, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of the two lot residential plat of property legally described as: That part of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 3 aforesaid and running thence East 720 feet to the Northerly line or side of right of way of the Minnetonka Branch of the Great Northern Railway, thence Southwesterly along the Northerly line on side of said right of way, 827.05 feet to the West line of Lot 3 aforesaid; thence North 423.1 feet to place of beginning the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by three judicial landmarks placed at the most Easterly corner of said tract of land at a point ^ in the Southwesterly line and at a point in the North line where said lines are intersected respectively by a line parallel to and 33 feet east of the West line of said lot. Also that part of the West 33 feet of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 Ncrth, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridiar' lying Southerly of County Road No. 7, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by four judicial landmarks placed at the Northwest corner and the Northeast corner, respectively, of said tract of land, end at a point in the Westerly line t.hereof 200.3 feet South along said line from said Northwesterly corner, and in the East line thereof at a point 275.4 feec South of the Northeast corner thereof. (hereinafter "the property"); and Pace 1 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance v/ith Minnesota Statutes 462.38 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 16, 1992, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on December 14, 1992, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Andrew J. Goetten, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The portion of the property proposed for subdivision is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 3.66 acres, of which 3.01 acres is contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of 33 feet of right-of-way for Orono Orchard Read, wetlands, and the non-contiguous portions south of County Road 15. ***. 3. The proposed plat contains two lots, Lot 1 consisting of 1.78 dry contiguous acres plus 0.2'^ acres located south of County Road 15 for a total of 2.01 jres and Lot 2 consisting of 1.23 dry contiguous acres. Lot 1 requires a variance to allow credit for non-contiguous area. Lot 2 requires a lot area variance. Thv^se variances have been granted per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 3223 of the City Council. 4. Each of Lots 1 and 2 abuts a public roadway open to traffic, and each lot contains the required 200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear of the 50' front yard setback line. 5. Lot 2, containing an existing residence, is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is provided with municipal sewer as part of the 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs Sewer Project. Lot 1, currently vacant, will not be served with municipal sewer, is outside the MUSA, ard has been confirmed as having acceptable primary and alternate drainfield sites. Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6 A City designated wetland occurs within the property ac locatiOTralong the southeast border of the property A conservation anfflowage easement w '.1 be required over these wetlands. 7 -53' of riaht-of-way for Orono Orchard Road will be d-dicated within the olat A small triangular portion ox. Ian- shall similarly be dedicated as right-of-way for Orono Lane, ??om tK portiL of property located south of County Road 15. 8 NO additional right-of-way .-ill be dedicat-.d ^or Fox Street. No upgrade of the existing Fox Street roadway will be required as part of this subdivision. 9. Lot 2 shall continue to gain access . ehssT 1 he allowed access either on Fox St..eet o Orchard Road (but not from both roadways) at a location to e approved by the Public Works Department. in The Dortion of property located south of County Road 15 VftV'filed on the Chain’of Title of Lot 1 and Outlot A. To^ 1 has be»n demonstrated to contain suitable prima^ ?V^il%^V/s^i4oesViV^: reVV^enVV c^Le Von^sViS rVithout the need fcr additional variances. NOW, cV:uncU*of tl^^^ of more of the finaings nreliirinary plat for Andrew J. Goetten at Orono hereby approves the ^el ^ /^^,29-92, revised 11-5-92, by cVfL^anfrrVVb^eVg Inc., su';iiect' to the following conditions: 1. variances will b® £°J "'VVndinVV VVVViliVVs orResolVftloVi .•0°’^ o^f tVie City Council. Page 3 of 6 L %V'-. CITY of ORONO RESOLimON OF THE CFTY COUNCIL NO_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Lot 1 shall be granted access on either Fox Street or Orono Orchard Road (but not on botn roads) at a location to be approved by the Public Works Department. 3. A dedication of ?3' right-of-way for Orono Orchard Road shall be indicated on the plat drawings. 4. A triangular portion of Orono Lane siiall be dedicated for Orono Lane right-of-way on the plat drawings. 5. Applicant shall execute a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetlands located in Lots 1 easement shall be shown on the plat drawings as c.ainage easements". 6. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be grantee along interior and perimeter lot lines. 7. The su.^ division shall be subject to the standard park fee. 8 The lake access parcel located south of County ^^^d 15 oroL Lane shall be platted as Outlet A, and shall be maintri^ed common with Lot 1 as residential lake access foi 1 sub-iect to a Special Lot Craiibination resolution to b^fUed in thi Cha\n of Title of both Lot 1 and Outlet A. 9. The city shall have the judicial landmark at the east end of the property replaced to its correct loc?-xcn. Council^meetfng on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1 Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar CL.pies and one a) copy reduced to 1" - 20C'. Drawing to include: A L-t lines platted per preliminary su^ey by Coffin aAd Groi=erg, Inc. dated 10-29-92, revised 11-5-92. « cation of "drainage and utility easements" lU' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5 eac.- si e of internal property lines. Page 4 of 6 ••■aiiiUw CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C. Designation of the wetlands in Lots 1 and 2 as a drainage easement on the plat drawings. 2. Legal documents required; A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. Signed and executed Conserval‘-'.n and Flowage Easement document; blank area requiring description may be filled out as follows: "Over che drainage easements as shown on the plat of ( plat name )". D. Special Lot Combination resolution for Lot 1 and Outlot A (City to draft). 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: ??00,• P_Q± A. Legal review and filing fees « $200.00 B. *Park Commission shall accept park fee in lieu of lands. The City Assessor has been asked to determine the fair market value of the undeveloped lands within the subdivision so that a park dedication fee can be determined. Applicant will be advised as soon as Roit Erickson, the City Assessor, has submitted his findings. Adopted by City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular ng held this 11th day of January 1993. Page 5 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COI TWCIL NO _________________ attest: Dorothy M. Hallin/ City Clark STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrunient was acknowledged before me on , . riav of January 1993 hy Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy T'mllfn ^ clirlc the City of Drone a Mi^esota miniJipal 'corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 6 mam mm Wilt KJtTtnCt^ [iwnroiiKi •rarwsi unmm iijun«^i mmm r CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1797 NOTICE OF PLANNLNG COMMISSION ACTION LATE OF NOTICE: 2/18/93 TO: Troy Anderson COPIES TO: 1490 Long Lake Blvd. Long Lake, MN 55356 W ' TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance 0 AGAINSTDATE OF MEETING: 2/16/93 VOTE: 5 FOR Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The applicant must provide a natural buffer of plantings between the applicant ’s addition and the neighboring residence to the east as soon as possible following the completion of the A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MLTSICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 2.3, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1797 WHEREAS, Troy Anderson (hereinafter, "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1490 Long Lake Blvd. within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 3 and 4, Albee’s Long Lake Addition, Hennepin County, and that part of Government Lot 1, Section 26, Township 118, Range 23, lying East of a line drawn parallel to and 675’ East of, measured at right angles to, the West line said Section 26 and West of the extension South of the most Westerly line of Lot 1, "Auditor ’s Subdivision No. 291, Hennepin County, Minnesota" (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 2.3, Subdivision 6(B), to permit the construction of a second story addition which will encroach within the side yard setback. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1797. 3. The property is located in the J.R-IA Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 16,1993, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based on the following findings: A. The applicant’s lot is limited by its unusual shape which will not allow expansion of the existing residence to the east, south, west, and some portions to tlie north due to setback restrictions. Page 1 of 5 B.The applicant’s expansion will not funher encroach into the existing substandard side yard setback. C.The applicant has agreed to provide additional vegetative screening between his house and the neighboring residence to the east 4.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other propeny in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is nece ;sary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONLITIONS Based on the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code .Section 2.3. Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a second story addition to the existing residence within the substandard side yard setback, which will not encroach within the existing 20.4’ from the east propeny boundary', subject to the following conditions: 1.The applicant is required to provide natural buffer of plantings between the addition and the neighboring residence to the east as shown on site plan/planting schedule attached to this resolution. Plantings must be completed no later than Julv 15. 1993. 2.Authorities granted by this variance run w i:h the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will Page 2 of 5 expire on that date (February 22. 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of February, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owncr(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of February. 1993. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 5 ST.ME OF MNNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY Or HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public ‘A iih in. and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing’instniment, and acknowledged that he (they) executed Lhe same as his (their) free ;*ct and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dav of , 199__before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing ipstmmenl, and aciciiowledged .jat he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOT>\RY PUBUC Page 4 of 5 To:Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager Date:February' 10, 1993 Subject: #1797 Troy Anderson, 1490 Long Lake Boulevard, Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential, 2-acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance: Section 2.3, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side yard setback Existing = 20.4’ Proposed = 20.4’ List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - n - I - j - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Existing Floor Plan Proposed First Floor Plan Proposed Second Floor Plan Proposed Front Elevation Letter from Neighbor Topographic Map Desi’ription of Request The applicant requests permission to add a second story to the existing structure within a substandard side yard setback. A partial second story is currently in progress which does meet the required 30’ side yard setback. The applicant requests a variance to add a second story- to the remainder of the structure which encroaches 9.6’ into the side yard setback. The proposed addition would not result in any changes to the existing hardcover and lot coverage. Hardcover between 75 ’ and 250 ’ of the Ordinary- High Water Level (OHWL) is approximately 16%. while hardcover between 250' and 500' of the UHWL is approximately 13%. Lot coverage is approximately 3%. Soil testing and septic system design have been approved by the City for a 3-bedroom house. The installation of a conforming septic system is required of the existing building permit and suitable area exists for the proposed addition of a third bedroom. Zt)ning File if 1191 February 10. 1993 Page 2 The neighbor immediately east of tlie applicant has expressed concern over this addition as the expansion area will overlook his residence. The neighbor has stated that he is pleased that the applicant intends to renovate the home, however, he requests additional buffer between the homes. The residences are 60’ apart with a privacy fence and a deciduous buffer separating them. The neighbor is asking for a coniferous buffer. Statement of Hardship The applicants hard.'hip is the unusual shape of this property, which limits expansion due to the re'^uired lot line setbacks. The location of the existing struemre prohibits expansion to iJie west, south, east and some portions to the north due to setback restrictions. Therefore, the applicant wishes to expand the second story addition currently in progress in order to provide additional space without further encroachment into the required side yard setbacks. d£ CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATIC^ijfy*" r i4 O Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200,00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) rvAv'ii-r I'rrTrr $ .AftnrfkL. L*i I :: 7Y OF OROHO rv A » .Aftnrfki A w'w'V^ V V'W'V ruzrv I.I 01 19LJ« T\ I I. 175. 175. /.■rrrr&r_rLMwr yniji\u.i.‘Uii f I Mnim »c.*u PROPERTY INFORMATION C'/tf TirfA.Of^nw\/ uwi nv'^ Ql/i Site Addresc I4 ’'^0 L) l</^. Bll'rf.(Or Property Identif. Number (P. I ,D.) -//.P •• ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Pr^paxty Acquired \2- 2,________(month/year) i OC'OJL. I (do|^o not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present—uSS^of property: y/^ residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Ncime Ttpy Address: 14^^ UrO City: ^)rAlnr^ Phone (home) _____ Phone fworlc) ■5‘^3>~7GI~7____ ______ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (worlc) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQCBST Estimated Construction Cost $ /St lO^V) • Describe request in detail: A Vlf)irifX/^PP/ -(ov' (\. Adrlth'An. vshi'oh (5. ZiO'4-” 4 rom ens± pr^Npctly \mfjj r VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width > Hardcover Lot Coverage \/setbacJc:Front V Side Rear Ave'*age Lakeshore Other (specify) BARDSBIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual propert^y cgjid.itions preventing compliance wit^ Zoning Code requirements: mV. 0 nr ,'^rj Vi KLlUl fJ} nULf LL[^ * ('ymnsim. _■J — (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1» s/ Completed Application Form 2._ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3._ _Tlat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. \/ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J5”xll'’ for reproduction). 5. yTopographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes V in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*i"xll"). 6. yr S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. _ _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the ^d>o▼e information has not been included. APPLICANT'S Sli^ATORS The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/het knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges ^nd agrees to this application and further authorl2es reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Canaaission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ±Lfr 1jL • i ’ J '( \ i r •i/ DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13 04. qnhH o ^ t. . data's we would like to inform you that your request for^^nlr^^'l- license from the City of Orono or any of i?s denlrtm«n*-e permxt or you to furnish certain private or confidential information!"^^ require -y^u are notified that; rf ^t .7.V\.»w j *■::h' 1 4 (• }J ■! _iL ti‘J j1490 Long Lake Boulevard Qrono, I'LLnnesota 55356 January 16, 1992 City of Orono Municipal Offices P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 lb IThom It May Concern, xt IS our racjuest tliat we have our variance application reviewed at the rebru^y 16, 1993, Planning Commission Meeting. We must vacate our rental property oy .Larch 1, 1993, and as we cannot assume occupancy of the existing structure until the second story addition is completed, we would greatly appreciate your consideration regarding this request. Troy and Cathy Anderson RUN DATE 01/20/95BATCH 00<PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OKNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAra TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OKNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR r PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR r HEWEPIN COLNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Cwrf^ERS LIST5B 26-116-25 55 0001 01466 LONG LAKE BLVO J H GARDNER t A L GARDNER ANITA L GARDNER I486 LONG LAKE DLVD LONG LAKE HN 55556 56 26-110-25 55 0005 01520 LONG LAKE BLVO D J SMITH A K S JONOALL D J SMITH A K S JONOALL 1520 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE HN 55556 58 26-118-25 55 0020 0086^ DAKOTA AVE J H EENHAY A K J GASNER JANET H BENHAY 864 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE HN 55556 58 2»-118-25 55 0029 01465 SIXTH AVE N NILLIAH R A BARBARA A PEARCE HILLI/H A BARBARA PEARCE PO BO> 9500 MPLS m 5544Q 56 55-118-25 22 0005 01509 LONG LAKE BLVO JAMES T COPLIN A NIFE JAMES I COPLIN 1509 LCNQ LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE HN 55556 TOTAL BATCH 004 00015 • » 58 26-118-25 55 000201490 LOrJG LAKE BLVO T 0 ANOERSON A C A ANDERSON TROY A CATHERINE ANOERSON 1490 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE HN 55556 58 26-118-25 55 0006 01550 LONG LAKE BLVO GRANT 0 EGGENBERG GRANT 0 EGGENBERG 1550 LONG LAKE BLVO lota; lake HN 55556 58 26-110-25 55 0021 00868 DAKOTA AVE D A C WODNARD DAVID A CYNTHIA NOODHARD 868 DAKOTA AVE lOtiG LAKE HN 55556 56 55-118-25 22 0001 01465 LONG LAKE BLVO KURTIS A GREENLEY A HIFE KURTIS A GREENLEY 1485 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE HN 55556 58 55-118-25 22 0004 01505 LONG LAKE BLVO JAMES 0 NEYHE ETAL JAMES D NEYHE 1505 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55556 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 738 26-110-25 35 000401516 LONG LAKE BLVO CINDY J FREDRICKSON CINDY FREDRICKSON C/0 STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE BOX 63C L0T4G LAKE MN 55556 38 26-116-25 35 0014 01555 LONG LAKE BLVO BERNICE ZUMBUSCH BERNICE ZUreUSCH 3 555 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55556 38 26-116-25 35 0027 01480 LONG LAKE BLVO ANITA A KEITH VANOER BRANOEN K R VANOEN BRANOEN 1400 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55556 • . t 38 35-118-25 22 0002 01525 LONG LAKE BLVO L H CAPRON ETAL H/L EST L N CAPROIj 17505 OLD ROCKFORD RO PLYMOUTH HN 55446 V 38 55-118-25 22 0005 01465 LONG LAKE BLVO DONALD N lUNO ETAL DONALD H LUNO 1465 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55556 ■ ♦ • s i . • V i i:- RUN DATE 01/20/9$HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4SS401 PACE 8BATCH OOA X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEFAIEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KtlONLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE • I ^ /y /y^e ^44^, /44J. ^0, 2T/ M89*4rE SouVW lin€ of Scc^^«*^ ZG TW^ Bxishinc^ Lgq 1 I)gr criphion {"ol'”! ’ Sort''^'’ition, Hennepin Connny, and That part of Government fi7t J^n't r^i? r ' '"'"’='''1’ 23, lyinq East of a Une drawn parallel to and Wost^^of'tho ’^ '>'■ tlqht anqles to, the West Une of said Section 26 and NnmL?%0t I:’""''";"'’ "f most Westerly Une of Lot I, "Auditor's SubdivisionNuitiboc 291, Hennepin Connhv, Minnesota " ^ miuxMsxon i'he^north''of‘'','h^‘' T''''’ t'xiaUnq house and a driveway serving a parcel to provenents or oncroacLentsT ''■'°l«'^ty. it does not purport to show any other im- o : Iron marker Ooarinq.s shown are basetl on an ;i ?snm«?cl datum. flsoNo m ^ -v» t/APl'I^OViT) i *ppi ’ ^ 'HtViSIOtlj 'HV _ l)Al L - r f^d /t^. Zf/ f- / :»••* • < : • • 00O tnr- % * / «•■» ro M .. .< •V'«.f •• -a part of Government iwn parallel to and id Section 26 and itdilor'a Subdivision serving a parcel to show any other ia- m OF ORONO 1' R - (y^-D’Nn PLAN >.l 0__________________ 1 II m X C/)’ 3 D T] O O ■D 3 \ 24-4'±(v£P|/SY) -X MLUi'lJH ■ ^ ■ } I . i wn> Q. 3 O 3 I • f ^—•. - - c ■ • . O e * a 3 I 1 ---- C 2 5 3 » 5 >G S <5 V / i- !s \ / \ p- : 1 , 1 1 :!• * %—yn • * • i • I pf 1 C/5 O _ i 2 W <D D.3o 3 r <‘ 3 OQ Oo 3 r, S c* «or ^ . » • UJ I 1 ! I j I iS: ! e : i/1 T I *I I*1^'i I i! I* * N \ ' a i r- • ^ \ <0K/ 4 II r, I t i » I I ! « 1 1 1I—^—1 ’ , 1 ■ 1 i [ 1 i (1 1 ! 1 1 !ii'♦1«p ' i ^' ili!!!l 1,' i'^.if ll*If'i'l’li [jii 'l!::i,iSi !;t \ ! mJ*i i' r^m ,1 —1— 1 r......... ' ■ 1 1 w i 1 m liii «ll!—........ 1 I r j r ’■•■Ml "A ■mrrtm I i'!Ji±l!jil!i !!;ii’!'i''i' i ' 1 T _ 1 ■ 1 ! I iKi'i'li'i'f-il :■|i:j'T1 J».~r.;!;;-!ii:'.' ] i ‘ 'h Wi 1 ! aii! v:k»-n»un: t t 1! f 1 i - 1 11 ' i____________ ! [' -- llJ ------------ ' h H'i'l ': ‘iiSlf t'. A X, . .k --..Jt. .O I I ! : - Vj .' «r ■' *' ■«•' •*< y< : r m !V 'i;.? :lv i ''f'‘‘ ••• ;■• » t* • *: *r^**t- ♦ ^.V«i \.- . *.». V 4..J .1 ■■'..r*■■';-%• •■ •'v’x-. »; '*' !,V L* ’ 7 f -’- h ’"' *^tl ‘- )J| >«<*»< . *• f <♦-**1" fv ^ i ^ ^ '»•? tr«-Tl • ‘^Vitr:'f.r..r f from KJl V^ndM Bruidea 1480lMfbfci6tyl bo|Lik«,MN.5S356 SPEED MESSAGE ^ -^iPr^r* tn'wr!T^ £/JP 0>?<? (^/X3&A/li^ ^ ap^y^xy?z/yi'^/^ oAsZi^_j&a^/yfy'j^T ^ j:^jo ORIGINAL - #^ ‘ ' #•«• \ '*v. *• I ^ « * • • - ■ u* ' . •* ^ •.•v'. • t <, • •• • • i • ■•••../ . -■■: -•.• ' . . ♦ .♦ •.; •■•;! ;•• ; .’’;/•.. /-. « ^ ^ r » • «.. • • t •. •“ . * » , • ’ * • ' « ' -•.. ? ■ I • • . V-. . •U :.■ :v;i •' 1 • • '• ‘i •\\y t.:n. % '** *Li. ' f • .M • I M-.V •V ... A • ‘..y ‘•;^i ’ ^ ■■ • • ^•^ N I m f : • '/v *v ,fV J U • » :;v-. : •• V* iC a % ' • •- . • :U4 ' •>1*1 ••It » * • ^ ‘ '' Y?‘' 4 # **’ * •tl* ^ • M* r •SVT i •! » • *, . *• •. m- 'h\'-V' ^ ■- ■itj. '..:■•* ■• • . 'lA’A * • ' r * '%* Jiiv**» *i * ^ 1 • • TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilniembcrs Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator % % FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administralo^^% February 18, 1993 %!? %m#1798 Fred and Barbara Ryan, 1345 North Arm Drive - Vacation of DKlicated Road - Resolution Brief Review of Application 111 May of 1988, Ryans had originally participated in the tiling of Application #1298 that sought the vacation of the remainder of Forest Blvd. Portions of Forest Blvd. had been approved for vacation by the City Council in March of 1988. During the review of that application, a property owner (Gordon Nelson) had advi.sed of access problems resulting from an earlier vacation of Oak Place in the early '70s. His property was legally landlocked -^nd the City lost access to sewer lines that remained in the Oak Place right-of-way. The application was tabled by the Planning Commission until the Nelson problem and the City ’s sewer easements were resolved. After the five year time lapse, the Ryans had assumed the vacation was completed. Not until a title search was prepared for a potential sale of their property did they realize that Forest Blvd. remained dedicated right-of-way. This issue has jeopardized the sale of their property and they have been required to file a separate vacation application to complete the vacation adjacent to their property. Please review the enclosed staff packet for more detail on background of the former application. The Planning Commisnon unanimously approved the vacation for the Ryans based on the findings established by the City in the original vacations of Forest Blvd. of 1988. In addition, it was determined that the vacation of the portion adjacent to the Ryan property would have no impact on the Nelson property. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions set fortli in the Planning Commission approval. / i Zoning File #1798 Februar}' 8, 1993 Page 3 This approval is based on the following findings: 1. The vacation does not affect the access or the use of adjoining properties 3. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve, or use the dedicated right-of-way of Forest Blvd. for road purposes. The City has not and does not intend to maintain or install utilities within the dedicated right-of-way of Forest Blvd. 4. The unimnroved dedicated right-of-way as it exists serves no public purpose. 4 A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF FOREST BOULEVARD WITHIN THE PLAT OF SAGA HILL REVISED SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 117 RANGE 23 IN THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA FILE NO. 1798 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on January 20, 1993. Fred S. Ryan and Barbara Ryan filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting ihe vacation of a portion of Forest Boulevard originally dedicated in tl'C plat of Saga Hill Revised legally described as follows: That part of Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the Plat of "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota" which lies between the northwesterly extensions across it of the southwesterly line of Lot 7, Block 6, "Saga Hill Revised Hennepin County, Minnesota" and a straight line running from the mid-point of the northwesterly line of Lot 5, said Block 6 to the mid-point of a southeasterly line of said Lot 5; and WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on February 16, 1993, regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1 . The vacation does not affect the access or the use of adjoining properties 2.The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve, or use the dedicated right-of-way of Forest Boulevard for road puqjoses. 3.Tlie City has not and does not intend to maintain or install utilities within the dedicated right-of-way of Forest Boulevard. Pace I of 2 J 4.Major portion of the dedicated right-of-way of Forest Boulevard is located below the 929.4 elevation of Lake Minnetonka. 5. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists serves no public purpose. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Fred S. Ryan and Barbara Ryan is hereby granted and that the portion of Forest Boulevard legally described above is hereby vacated. The granting of the petition is subject to the condition that upon vacation, applicants must combine vacated adjacent portion of Forest Boulevard with their property. Adoptee! by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held on February 22, 1993. ATTESTED: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing in.stnimcnt was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of February, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal co."poration and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 /. TO:Planning Commission Members Rom Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:February 8. 1993 SUBJECT: #1798 Fred and Barbara Ryar.. 1345 North Arm Drive - Vacation of Dedicated Road “ Public Hearing (7:00 p.m.) Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.12. Vacation of streets, alley and public roads. Portions of Forest Blvd. were vacated for nine property owners on March 28, 1988. Applicants originally joined in with ten remaining property owners in May of 1988 to complete total vacation of Forest Blvd. The application was tabled at the Planning Commission based on one of the ten property owner ’s claim that a previous vacation had landlocked his property (review Exhibits H and J). The Planning Commission directed that the Cii> make every attempt to resolve land owners ’ problem resulting from a vacation in the early ’70s and that the Planning Commission would act on the remaining vacation of Forest Blvd. as soon as that is resolved. The Ryans have applied for a separate vacation of Forest Blvd. as the sale of their property has been Jeopardized because vacation has not been completed. Members may recall that dedicated Forest Blvd. is used for lake access of all abutting private property owners. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Legal Description of Property to be Vacated E - Council Minutes of 3/28/88 F - Planning Commission Minutes of 6/20/88 G - Map - Properties Vacated in ’88 and Properties Pending Vacation Approval H - Nelson Letter 3/10/88 I - DNR U-tter 3/11/88 J - Surv'ey of Nelson Property and Driveway Review of Current Request Mr. and Mrs. Ryan have been patiently waiting for the final vacation of Forest Blvd. In fact, they had assumed that the vacation was completed by now and sold their property as if Forest Blvd. had been vacated. Recent title searches confirmed that the vacation was never completed and applicants in desperation have filed for a sep 'rate vacation so that the sale of their property can be finalized. Zoning File #1798 February 8, 1993 Paee Review of Application #1298 Application #1298 involved vacation request of the ten remaining property owners. The City had already approved the vacation for nine property owners in March of 1988. Review Exhibit H, Mr. Nelson, one of the applicants joining in Application #1298, advised the City of his need to resolve access to the property. As with the vacation oi Forest Blvd., all legal a:cess to his property is v.icated. Remember Mr. Nelson had submitted the letter for the earlier vacation Application (#1251). Planning Commission tabled a!! action on Application #1298 until Mr. Nelson’s access problems were resolved. The City Attorney’s office and staff have been working on various attempts to achieve legal access for Mr. Nelson. It is still Mr. Nelson s position that it is the City s responsibility to acquire access since the City approved the vacation without assuring that appropriate access easements were provided to his property. Members may also remember that the City has sewer lines within vacated Oak Place and appropriate utility and access easements were never acquired by City. In 1989 the staff went through detailed surveying and the creation of legal descriptions for the four affected property owners to grant easem.ents over vacated Oak Place to Mr. Nelson. When one of the four propert} owners demanded variances for future construction of the City for the granting of the easement, the City ceased all dealings with owner and owner’s attorney. Another attempt was made to have a single property owner grant an easement over one side of the vacated right-of-way but in. the end after the documents were prepared the single property owner refused to grant easements becau.se of potential impact on existing mature plantings. Other legal avenues were considered such as the original vacation not being considered valid but this option proved to be far too cum.bersome and costly. The City is now considering obtaining a prescriptive easement over Nelson’s drive located within the vacated right-of-way. This could be either completed by Mr. Nelson or the City on his behalf. If Mr. Nelson pursued the registration his own, the City would be responsible for the payment of all legal fees. The City must obtain utility easements via another method. Review Exhibit G. Forest Blvd. has been vacated to the immediate southwest of the Ryan property. The vacation of Forest Blvd. adjacent to the Ryan propert)’ would have no impact on the Nelson dilemma. In fact the only portion of Forest Blvd. that could not be vacated would be the portions adjacent to the Johnson property. It will be staff’s recommendation that we proceed with the vacation of the remaining seven property owners and complete the total vacation of Forest Blvd. until the Nelson access and City sewer easements are resolved. Staff Recommendation To approve the vacation application of Fred and Barbara Ryan that would seek the vacation of Forest Blvd. along the west lot lines of Lots 6 and 7 and 25’ of Lot 5, Bhxk 6. Zoning File #1798 February 8, 1993 Page 3 This approval is based on the following findings: 1. The vacation does not affect the access or the use of adjoining properties 2. 3. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve, or use the dedicated right-of-way of Forest Blvd. for road purposes. The City has not and does not intend to maintain or install utilities within the dedicatf*d right-of-way of Forest Blvd. 4. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists serves no public purpose. CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION I PROPERTY LOCATION /3^Ssite Address v>o Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) CJ 1 ~~ 11 '1 L OO d> Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name __ __ _ _ \ —<3 ^ s!;) ha^Tx Phone (home) Phone (work) Address l\) • F^rt'H _ _ _ City kAC ^ Phone (home) ^ip. - JOWNER (if different than applicant) Name Pc\ «'ho tr^ (C. Phone LVl _I H/jp.Q, Address / l\), \^C i>'1 citV?'^ ou Zip ?4y Date Property Acquired _ _ _/ ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of lard FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - M W'WVV $ 50.00 For each variance request with COP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use CITY OF ORCiiO FIERCE OFFICE 01 CEfi 150.OC LW TL 150.00 RECElFT-THA^jK YOU ^263600 cool flOl T15ioim $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00/ Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ^00 ■ QQr Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision - - - -- $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprenensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _ _ _ Residential Other (specify)^ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail; 1 • REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmer Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any o^' persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X I?" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. MB mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mmm ^m ^m ^m mm ^m ^ mm ^m mm ^m ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm mmm mm ^m mm mmm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m ^m mm m • mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CERTIFrCATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) S3. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1798, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Wicness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 27th day of January, 1993. Jamie) Bosma I I r RUN DATE 03/24/60BATCH 005 ■or r PROP AOOR OM^ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OVOIER »1AHI: TAXPAYER ilAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OljNER »UNE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OWNER NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADOR ClfflER NAHE TAXPAYER >UHE/A00R PROP AOOR OWNER EUHC TAXPAYER )MMC/AOOH HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 13 38 07-117-23 14 0027 CARY C DEITO ETAL i/ k / / 8ARY-r-0CI T0 VtU) Uo Ci’uCl^ 1169 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 33 07-117-23 14 0030 01179 ELMWOOO AVE BRUCE GARLOCK BRUCE GARLOCK 1179 ELMWOOO AVE HOUIO MN 55364 36 07-117-23 14 0037 01153 ELMWOOO AVE RICHARD JAMES HEIT RICHARD JAMES IIEIT 1153 ELnWOCO AVE HCXAIO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0059 01199 ELMWOOO AVE J » E HARVEY J SCOT HARVEY 1199 ELIMOOD MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-1 41 P314 01245 NOR.n AKri OR . . . ii OtOTCe-HOVtANB (W I yI iyLiL* LitA^ •eeRoe-HovomD 1285 NO ARM OR ' HOUND 191 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0017 01265 ELMWOOD AVE JOt»N A PERKINS JR ETAL JOHN PERKINS 1265 ELMWOOO AV HOL»« MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0028 01153 ELMWOOO AVE RICHARD JAMES HEIT RICHARD JAMES HEIT 1153 ELMWOOO AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0029 01161 ELMWOOO AVE B E E R K GARLOCK DRUCE E GARLOCK 1179 ELMWOOO AV MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0035 01160 ELMWOOO AVE J W LAHORECIIT ET AL JON W LAHORECIIT 1180 ELMWOOO AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0036 B E » R K GARLOCK BRUCE GARLOCK 1179 ELMWOOD AV MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0052 01151 NORTH ARM DR R A KUTZ ETAL R A KUTZ 1151 NO ARM DR hOUD 191 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0054 01179 NORTH ARM DR II A N ROCKVAM NORMAN A NANCY ROCKVAM 1179 NORTH ARM DRIVE. MOUND Nil 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0060 01169 «A»Y GARY i-ROSALIE DCH» 1169 N ARM OR HOUND MN 55364 NORTH ARM OR . . ./ t-N. / l,012 E-BEITO ETAL^-.tYtJ/!»»j V£t\U<A 38 07-117-23 41 0013 05 NORTH ARM DR AUL R SKAGERBERG PAUL R SKAGERBERG 1205 NORTH ARM OR MCJNO m 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0015 01285 NORTi; ARM ORVAC03 MUKIn AKn UK I *-6tOR6e-1tOVtAHB~IS..'/uixl i L’.SYi. /JfOrv •GEORGE HOVYWMO- 4•GEOROE HOVfcANO- ~1285 NORTH ARM DR MOUNO Nil 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0016 01205 ELMNOOO AVE H OVALI. t E OVALL A JTOIIALD i- JACRUCUMK tllAII .OuWiOb'l /uL| 1205 ELMWOOO AVE HOUND MN 55364 V.J 38 07-117-23 41 0018 01295 ELMWOOO AVE 36 07-117-23 41 0021 01310 ELMWOOO AVE- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UiJiV CLIWUUU *VC nFUAHS I 9 M ErHHTBT Jcftiiu. t (VUiAYZi^oROON N NELSON ETAL KEL-tY BEVArni I SUti^ri SCMIUOT CORDON N NELSON 1295 EUtWOOO AVE 1310 ELMWOOO MOUNO MN 55364 MOJIO IttI 55364 Rini DATE 03/2Ve8BATCH 005 IIEHHEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO, PI4T5<*01 PAGE I'*REPORT NO. Pl'ilSAOl PAGE 13W-23 lA C029 ELMMOOO AVE K GARLOCK OARLOCK >4000 AV I 5536A PROP ADDP OW44ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODRPROP ADDR 0WI4ER NAME TAXPAYER HAME/ADOR 30 07-117-23 41 002901301 NORTH ARM OR ELIZABETH L DRESSEL ERICK KALLERUP 1301 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 5536430 07-117-23 41 003201317 NORTH ARM DRAfW-V-CABSON fin o Hi r I? AHN L CMOW 01317 N ARM DR HOUKO HH 5536<^38 07-117-23 ^1 003001305 ELKMOOD AVE KEITH E SIMON3/PEPSOHAL REP jmWTHf-PLAjSIAK plUficl 1305 ELMWOOD AV MOUHD MM 5536438 07-117-23 41 007901375 PARK DR RICHARD M HATCH A WIFE RICHARD M HATCH 1375 PARK DR MOUMD MH 55364 38 07-117-23 41 003101305 NORTH ARM DR ROBERT E ANDERSON THEODORE A ANDERSON NORTH ARM OR MOUND MN 55364 ‘38 07-117-23 41 008001365 PARK DR EDWARD 6 NEWTON A WIFE EDWARD G NEWTON 1365 PARK DR MOUND MN 55364 I II r.117-23 14 0036I K GARlock iARLOCK .MI^!OQO AV IN 55364 PROP A* JR OWNER lAME TAXPA' ER NAMT ADDR 30 07-117-23 41 000101331 NORTH ARM OR A P FRIELER A A B FRIELER ALLEN P « ANDY B FRIELER 1331 NORTH ARM DRMOUND MN 55364 f'L 30 07-117-25 41 000201359 PARK DR PETER H LAMPHF.R ET AL PETER t DIANE LAMRIER 1359 PARK CR HOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 008601345 NORTH ARM OR FRED S RYAN ET AL * :D S RYAN .345 NORTH ARM DR MOUMO MN 5536417-23 14 0054 north arm 09 ITKVAM ^ NANCY ROCKVW1 hm arm drive. I 55364 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 41 0088 01304 ELMWOOD AVE RICHARD J JOHNSON ET AL RICHARD J JOHNSON 1304 ELMWOOD MOUND MN 55364 30 07-117-23 42 0038 01379 PARK DR C H FAIRBAMK JR ET AL TRUSTEES C H FAIRBAMK JR/P R FAIRBANK 1300 PARK DR S U MOUND 55364 TOTAL BATCH 005 00029 il7-23 41 0013 north arm oh SKAOERBCRG SKAGERBERG RTH ARM DR N 55364 117-23 41 0016 EIE64000 AVE iMAlA- TTki HO k • I CERTIFY THAT THF FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AMD TRUE REPRESENTATIOM OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORi»S OF THc HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AMO BELIEF. DAT^ ^ . . . .U—^h-t Cfl -117-23 41 0021 CLMHOOO AVE N MEtSON ETAL N NELSON LHMOUO m »S»4 1 p 0 rCOFFIN & GRONBERG, INC.,i .t ' \ SUnVEYINQ. ENQINEERINQ AND LAND PLANNING 4B2 A TAMARA^KAVENUE ^ LONG LAKE. MTNfr'65356 ‘‘J • • / ____L.y .••••• ■ 473-4141 May 27, 1988 Proposed road vacation descriptions (continued) line running from the midpoint of the northwester-ly line of Lot 5, said Block 6, to the midpoint of the southeasterly line of said Lot 5. RYAN PORTION That part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." which lies between the northwesterly extensions across it of the southwesterly line of Lot 7, Block 6, "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." and a straight line running from the midpoint of the northwester 1y line of Lot 5, said Block 6, to the midpoint of the southeasterly line of said Lot 5. HOWELLS PORTION That part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." which lies between the northwesterly extensions across it of the Northeasterly line of Lot 4, Block 15, "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." and the southwesterly line of Lot 5, said Block 15. SOLBLRG PORTION Tiat part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co., Minn." which lies between the northwesterly extension across it of the Northeasterly and South­ westerly lines of Lot 8, Block 15,"Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minn." KELLEN PORTION That part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the pUt of "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co., Minn." which lies between the northwester 1y extensions across it of the northeasterly line of Lot 6, Block 15, "Sega Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minn." and the southweste 1*ly liri? of Lot 7, said Block 15. minutes of the regular ORONO council meeting held r^CH 28, 1988 ,1248 WILLIAMS CONTINUED . the City should do something about these streets. Acting Mayor Callahan agreed with Councilmember Goetten, and because of this issue felt that condition in the drafted resolution pertaining to the access to the site should be omitted. CounciImembers Sime and Gcetten amended their motion to omit condition #4 from the resolution. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0 #1250 DANA WELLS 1397 ORONO LANE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2388 Dana Wells was present fo' this matter. It was moved by Councilmember cLncilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2388 approving the variance per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1251 AUDREY SCHULTZ PARTIAL VACATION OP FOREST BOULEVARD “SOLUTIONS #2389 -^#2397 Citv Administrator Bernhardson explained the request fora pLu^l vacation of Forest Boulevard, the remainder of Vine Place and portion of a park. Saga Dlat He noted that all property the subject properties were notified of the application. A Kiav nf affected property owners refused to join j.nA number of affected prope 7 notice has been the «PPi^"“°"Vve®p/oposed^^ therefore, a total ^a^Si^n of Forest b'^TvI. is r"ot possible at this time. nr.r.‘.2;nn; kt..\ k"." an error on the plat map that shows a portion of th^parkas'^uneacfted*’ where ^ fact it is actually vacated. lL._ _ _ \zrm:\timetten, 1 the site Dn to t fot ion. (d by ^2388 :ion. i;rtl:i iM i I t for er of ised, O' of ition. in in been total .me. ue of »r an ore a also on of la 1 ly •Tzmpi r»T=T*i Mine*] ertyheir MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 20, 1988 d by )9 to i, an ^ark, i^sed. :s of >rest 3t to arage area >t an 11 be ' the will over Bohns td by 98 as #1298 RICHARD JOHNSON \yACATION OF PORTIONS OP FOREST BOULEVARD SABXHILL REVISEDPUBLIC HEARING ® ^ Publication and Certificate of Mailingwere noted.Richard Johnson was present for this matter. Mabusth explained the request to vacate the remaining portions of Forest Boulevard. She noted that prior to final vacation of Forest Blvd., legal access to the Nelson property must be obtained via the four property owners. Cohen and Hanson felt that the legal access should be resolved prior to recommending approval of this vacation application in order to avoid the chance of land locking the Nelson property. It was noted that Mr. Nelson is currently working on this legal access with ’his attorney . Coun-ilmember Callahan felt Forest Boulevard must remain open until legal access to the Nelson property is resolved . There were no comments from the public regarding this matter. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Kelley, to table this matter pending resolve of legal easement access to the Nelson property. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. #1299 NANCY HIGGINS 3017 NORTH SHORE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:50-8:52 ^The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. j' Nancy Higgins was present for this matter. Mabusth explained the request for a conditional use permit to recognize the existing caretaker unit and guest cabin that serve as accessory use to the principal residence. Applicant plans to remove the principal residence and construct a new residence. Kelley advised applicant to take .into consideration the hardcover ordinance when developing a site plan for the new residence. 8 Os t/>ocu 0Tt ro N ■Vl". 2 o O 33 i 1 I March 10, 1^68 Closina o'f Forest Blv'd. At this time I must object to the closinq of Forest Blvd h.=r.»uoe it could land-lock mv property. ■ „ In'l972 Orono clcnod Oak so that I am now driving on orocertv balonainc to tour ditterent property ownsr=. Th*» wardono without noti .'ying mo. This problem must be solved Faresh Blvd can be closed. 1 Lulcl like'Forest Blvd closed in front of my property when this problem is scolved. V 5^'^. T \ I \ \ "oAirr t -1‘ A^‘ 'i : o » :d : o !omV W.MMWtl iM I [•iuHiM mm\ % I ’ 1 I >• ■ii % ■Ur > I>Cd I <“ Udl«» 0 1 20 ‘• 4 • 8-iy-«8 Iron marfc.«r I > r ' o cn • i ■■ . jA . r^J’ . ^ ■JT - 'M ■ > ITO:%FROM:DATE:%!Vlayor Callahan and Orono Councilnictnbers Ron Moorse, City Administrator ' ~ v>Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator ' cjf*- *^o. VFebruary' 18, 1993 VSUBJECT: #1799 Albert and Sally Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public HearingBrief Review of Application Applicants were required to file a conditional use permit for land alterations proposed in excess of 100 cubic yards. I^nd alterations were required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit during tnt '•eview of the three lot subdivision application requiring the installation of a sediment pond of a T depth. The Conser\'ation and Flowage Easement taken over the drainage casement area requires that the City approve all land alterations within the protected area. As land alterations for a pond were already required by the Watershed District, the additional extavaricn:; to approximate 5’+ would create no additional impact on area. The sediment pond would now have standing water rather than just the periodic runoff created during wet seasons. The City Engineer has confirmed that the additional depth will b.ave no impact on the functioning of the pond as a sediment control/trap. In 1992 the City of Orono t iled a conditional use permit variance application dealing with road improvements for Fox Street that involved the expansion of the existing road bed and the filling of the adjacent wetlands on the north and south side of road. The DNR permit requires that the City provide a compensatory excavation for mitigation purposes within the immediate watershed. The applicants have been asked to consider allowing the City to excavate to the edges of the drainage easement to a 1’ depth to allow for the 21,000 s.f. area needed to mitigate the filling of the wetland. The issue for the applicants was whether the mature trees within the drainage easement could be presen'cd as a re.sult of the City’s excavations. Shawn Gustafson of the City Engineer’s office has advised that it was the Engineer’s intention all along to preserve the more mature trees located along the edges ot the drainage easement. The Planning Commission recognized the need for applicants to proceed during the cold winter months also noting that any e.xcavation proposed widiin the protected area should be completed within the w inter months and advised that if applicants were agreeable and it the City could arrange to meet the requirements of the DNR pennit in time to jointly proceed with the proposed land alteration that this may not conflict with applicants ’ schedule. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the conditional use permit/variance application of Albert and Sally Hanscr that would allow the excavation of a sediment pond at a maximum of 5’3" depth, proposed lowest elevation 928, as shown on grading plan by Mark S. Gronberg dated 11/27/92, revised 1/21/93 and further encourage applicants to work with City to determine if both schedules can be coordinated so that all alteratioas can be completed within the winter of 1993. Since the Planning Commission meeting, staff has received a phone call from Mr. Hanser who has advised that he is willing to work with the City on this project. Staff has advised the City Engineer’s office to submit a revised plan to the DNR to be sent 2/18. It is hoped that the DNR will provide their final approval within the next seven to ten days and that both projects can be completed at the same time. Staff and applicants will be meeting the week of February 22nd to work out such details as sharing of cost and work. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission’s recommendation. A RESOI.UTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1799 WHEREAS, Albert and Sally Dodge Hanser, (hercinalter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1685 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, Hanser Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to allow the excavation of a pond within a 8,000 s.f. area located w ithin a drainage easement dedicated at the time of the platting of the Hanser Addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1799. The property is approximately 2 + acres in area 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 16, 1993 and recommended approval of the conditional use permit that would involve land alterations within a public drainage easement based on the following findings. Pennit Application #92-41 of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has required the excavation of a sediment pond within the protected area defined as drainage casement. Pace 1 of 5 i C) The aJdifional excavation to a 4-5’ depth will not hinder the functionin!^ of the pond as a sediment trap and in the City Engineer’s opinion will enhance that function. All mature trees located within the drainage easement will not be removed as a result of the improvements. The entire disturbed area shall be restored to its former natural state. 4. The City Council firn.'s that granting a conditional use permit to allow the excavation of the sediment pord will not be detrimental to the health, safety or genera! welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, not will its use depreciate surrounding propeny values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Compreheasive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon ;vk or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional us^ ;>ermit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to Albert and Sally Douge Hanser that would allow the excavation of a sediment pond at approximately S’S" deep within an 8,000 s.f. area located within a public drainage easement, subject to the following conditions: 1.All excavated materials to be used for residential construction should be fenced off with silt fence for erosion control. All disturbed areas should be restored to their natural suUc. Excavated materials shall be placed so that surface runoff will not allow sediment or nutrients to flow back into pond or low areas that interact with wetlands to northeast. Applicants are encouraged to work with the City of Orono Public V/orks Department so that additional alterations proposed by City within drainage easement area can be completed at the same time. Ail excavation work must be completed within the winter months while ground is still in frozen condition. Page 2 of 5 3. 4. 5. ATTEST: Authorities granted by this resolution run with (he property not with the owner but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a land alteration permit or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (February 22. 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with a.ry of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of them.selves, their heirs, successors anc assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property'. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of February, 1993 Dorothy M. Hallin. City Cleric Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Pace 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Miimesot’a municipal corporation and said iiistn-ment was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Mv Commission Expires Paae 4 of 5 ^ i .. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notar>' Public within and for said county, personally appeared________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) tree act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) NOTARY PUBLIC On this dav of , 199 before me a Notary Public withinand for said county, personally appeared-------------------------^------------------ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing insirument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed NOTARY PUBUC Page 5 of 5 TO:Planning Commi«:sicn Members Ron Mocrse, Cirv Administrator I ROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:February 8, 1993 SUB.FECT: #1799 Albert and Sally Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit/ Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03, Subd. 19. Applicants propose alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. Alterations will take place within approximately a 8,000 s.f, area of a 22,700 s.f. drainage easement area. At its deepest point the pond will be approximately 5’3" (existing elevations 933.3, proposed lowest elevation 928). Variance Required for Land Alterations within Area Protected by Flowage and Conservation Easement As already noted in the earlier review of the 3-lot subdivision, the low woexied area was not classified as a designated wetland within the City’s mapping nor is it a DNR protected wetland. The area was designated as a drainage easement with the standard flowage and conservation taken over the area. If applicants propose alterations within protected drainage easement areas, the City must approve per the conditions of the Flowage and Conservation Easement. Applicants were required to make certain storm water improvements for the MCWD permit involving 1 ’ excavations for the purpose of creating a sediment trap. As applicants’ application involves e.xcavations greater than 1’ a separate conditional, use pt/mit has been requ.red. List of Exhibit*" A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - MCWD Report 6/30/92 E - MCWD Pennit 11/20/92 F - Gustafson Letter 2/5/93 G - Flo ’vaee and Conservation Easement - Hanser Addition H - Existing Topography 1 - Private Driveway - Cross Profile J - Grading/Drainage Plan Zoning File ft 1199 Februar)' 8. 1993 Page 2 Descriplion of Request Applicants have filed a conditional use permit to excavate a pond of approximately a 5 ’ + depth that will hold standing water rather than periodic runoff created during wet seasons. As Hansers’ MCWD permit requires excavation of 1’ for sediment control, land alterations within the drainage easement area are required and have already been approved by City and MCWD. The pond will occupy approximately 8,000 s.f. of the 22,700 s.f. drainage easement area. Refer to Exhibits H and I. The entire low area is at the 933.3’ elevation. The adjacent wetland that will interact with the low area is at the 932.3 elevation. Note the culvert has been placed at the 935.78 elevation. The engineering plans for the private driveway have been approved by both the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer. Note that Lots 2 and 3 will share a private drive once it leaves Outlot A. Lot 2 is required to grant appropriate ea.sements to Lot 3. The City Engineer ’s report does not review the merits of the applicants’ plan as proposed. In a recent phone conversation, he confirmed that applicants’ proposal is complete and would meet the intent of the MCWD permit. Gustafson recommends an expansion of the application to provide compensatory mitigation to offset filling of designated wetland to the northeast for the City’s improvement of Fox Street. Members may remember the earlier conditional use permit/variance application of the City of Oruno that proposed the expansion of the Fox Street roadbed. The City has been working with the DNR to locate an appropriate area for compensatory mitigation within the immediate watershed. The City Engineer states that if the existing alteration of the pond is expanded to the 933.3 elevation at a 1’ depth approximately 14,000 s.f. in area this will meet 21.000 s.f. area required by the DNR permit of the City. Absent a storm water management plan, the City must obtain the landowners ’ approval to make use of the drainage area. Review the Flowage and Conservation Easement, the owners are limited in their u.<:e of the drainage easement area and the City’s main interest is for the uniestric'.ed trespass of water. There is nothing in the easement that would allow the area to be altercw. oy the City to solve more comprehensive drainage issues. If the City can work jointly with applicants/owners in meeting the requirements of the City’s permit, this may be the best solution to you. meeting Staff will contact the owners as to what their position would be on this recent request of the City to expand their application. 'Fhey will also hear further from the City Attorney as to the authorities granted the City under the current Flowage and Conservation Easement. Regardless of the magnitude of the application, the following guidelines have been established by the City Engineer ’s report if excavations are to be made w ithin the lower area. All dredged materials must be placed at least 75’ from the drainage easement and fenced off with sill fence for erosion control. It has also been '-uggested that some of the excavated materials h l Zoning File #1799 February 8, 1993 Page 3 silt fence for erosion control. It has also been suggested that some of the excavated materials can be used by the City in constructing the embankments along Fox Street. It would be staffs recommendation that any organic materials be placed at least 75’ from the wetland. The outlet area adjacent to culvert should be protected with silt fencing and that entire area be restored to native grasses. Applicants have expressed concern that the current permit will expire on April of 1993. If the land alteration is expanded to include the City ’s iX*eds, the City will be required to present an amended proposal to the DNR and Watershed District under its current part. Issues for Consideration 1.Absent the City ’s needs if the original MCWD p.*miit approving the subdivision required land alterations within the low wooded area would the additional excavations have an impact on your recommendation? 2.Is the application more acceptable if areas disturbed are restored to theii fonner natural state? 3.How do you feel about the piggybacking of the City ’s needs upon a private owners proposed improvement? If the City had a storm water management plan, tliis type of request from the City Engineer would be common place. Hardship Statement Review Exhibit A. It is the position of the applicant that land alterations have to take place within the lower area to meet the guidelines of the MCWD. The deeper elevations will allow for standing water and also functio' as a sediment trap. 1 'F OKONO “ GiiNUioXL LjXND USii /APPLICATION rPERTY LOCATION ^Site Address ^0 X TTK^CT 1 4 •. 7•3 H \\ •' I ' //t / »1 A-7sr' t" *- ■—-------------------------« /T *^ ' Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 03 ~//7-23 - VV - C7<:77?V Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) Name j4i^(n-r / f/ttt r Phone (work) Address /^ay rr/tf/'T"City r Cat A Zip srJ9/ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name r/f/vif Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) PEES - CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS - rTTV (“r nrjnun $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP applicatl6p,-'c-nrr^r 1 "*50200000$125.00 Residential accessory Ose 200,00 CHECK "" 7L zbeCoOI $175.00 Institutional (church, schoo), etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments RECEIPT-THAK'K YOU r»Vt< D/\1 TfA»Tr7i.Wta^wfV vwA i\vA #a'T*w $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg 01/2i/9 _____ $250.00 Conunercinl/Industrial Use 3*^ $200.00 Land Alteration X Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Resoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTYPresent Zoning District Present Use of Property X #*J^,*J* Resideatj.al 3 ^ J \ \ ^ eaUal Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: cj^Jffucr a c <(ck //sr^^cy /O/’ Sfr//*^r^ jf*y ;^vV-^ (c>^' ^*y REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a tieparate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. •» •• •• •• •• •• •• ** ** ** The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mm mm mam m ■ mam mm mam mmt mm amm mam mam mm aam mm mm ^m mm ^m ^m mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or reouested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to ther+»est of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature j-iL j) rSciaS.Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorised reasonatle entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verifJ^atiorXvOf this;request. ( JilL l)oc^ I 0U6c/C^ Date ij ^Owner's signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building fc Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 01/19/93 heu ^pin county property information systemPROPERTY ONNERS LISTBATCH 002PROP ADORonner nameTAXPAYERNAME/ADDR SB 02-117-23 33 0010 OIAIO SHORELINE DR A HARRISON AIL HARRISON ALFRED A INGRID L HARRISON 1410 SHORELINE DR HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR 0»t€R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 30 10-117-23 11 0001 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SUAD H AZHARX SUAD H AZHARI 1745 FOX ST HAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 33 0014 16bb FOX ST KATHLEEN 0 MACKE KATHLEEN 0 MACKE 6432 TIMBER RIDGE EDINA MN jd439 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 356 03-117-23 41 0004C1620 FOX ST THE HAKEFIELO ORONO P^SHP THE HAKEFIELO ORONO PTNRSHP C/0 ROBERT J THEILER P 0 BOX 9500 DEPT 26 MPLS MN 55440 36 05-117-23 44 000201745 FOX ST SUAD H AZHARI SUAD H AZHARI 1745 FOX ST HAYZATA m 55391 36 10-117-23 11 0002 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO MCLEOD CNfY REG RAIL AUTH DAKOTA RAIL INC 25 ADAMS ST H HUTCHINSON »fl 55550 TOTAL BATCH 002 00005 38 03-117-23 44 0003 169b FOX ST RICHARD J & KATHLEEN S CATHCART RICHARD & KATHLEEN CATHCART 169b FOX ST ORONO MN bb391 38 03-117-23 44 0004 & 0005 A & S MANSER ALBERT & SALLY MANSER 3600 IDS CENTER MPLS MN 55402 T ( I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THn HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE DEST OF HY KNONIEDGE AND BELIEF. • . DATE Ml J♦JJ J J 1 J 02-'Ul''9.T OS: 52 FAX 012 473 6002 • m' t'i* MfAIlUEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Bex 387, Wayzata, Minnisola 55391 >»«» • Jefw t Tftamas* Ilarzs VV lik:wy1ft A&gbW*C.Vtog>rirLoyt>toteaiU.‘;;ty/«Tr<it>aaiirtg'f. j;^ June 30,1992Ecntiit AppUpfl(i^n Nn. 07^f. Applicant: Albeit D. Hanser 1685 Fox Street Wayzaia, MN 55391 . Parpose:’ ' Dear Mr. Hanser: 1. 2. ^aredto otinaiviMal bouse* andtetiSltgaWona^^ nr-oi locaccns .01 '“t “ ffiL Gsspssassjsassa tesssf ”‘®'“ If you have aty quejlions regarding this maner, please cosuct me at 473-4224. Sinccrely. JAMES M. MONUGOMERY. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC Enguictrs for the Distdet ft Ronald S. Quanbcclc, P.E. be a: Boirdf^ 4 \ k •• • •> •i • • ••• ‘I* iVIIIUIUEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Waytata. Minnesota 55391 6(MBDOM1ANAOB)$; Jones ft SptiuteycPnR •JotmF.'n1atre;•ft:^4^!R.fXi:!•' Rotot D. Bfckson • C. VSbwJrow levn • Cirtcsen Undey • Tlicms Maple. Jc November 20, 1992 Penmt Apnlica fion No. 92-41: Applicant: Locatiuu: l»urpose: Albert D. Hauser 1685 Fox Sticct Way^ata, MN 55391 City of Orono, Sec. 3DC, south of Fox Street and west of Orono Orchard Road Stormwater management plan foi a 3 lot single family residential subdivision. Dear Mr. llanser: Receipt is acknowledged for the followiag which you have submitted a.s part of the above permit application; 1 Revised street construction plan dated Octeber 7, 1992. The above exhibit is in accordance with the action taken by the Board of Managers on April 16, 1992, in reference to the above permir. This document i? your permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Permit approval is based upon the following exhibits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Permit Application 92-41 received March 9, 1992. Hyr;", .op.ic calculations dated March 7, 1992. Uvf *- iTom DNR dated April 23, 1992. Lcnei from the applicant’s representative to the City of Orono dated March 9. 1992. Revised site plan dated May 21, 1992. Lmter from the applicant’s representative to the Districi dated July 10, 1992. Revised street construction plan dated October 7, 1992. Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Fobruarv 5, 1993 Ono O Boneu'DO ftooen W p£ • C PE ***J'^f . t Tu'f'rr G*fnn R Coc« PE E P£ PoOffT Cj P£ SuViri M Efcehin CPA •Vnicy COP'ut^t A ’Wr^'cvi P£ Hf'tn A Oonion P£ Rotrrt R EE 0 •’jnj \% ^,'*rr *»£ O LOSH^fd P£ RoOf^ " RiiSirfc AJA ^ Boxj'Oor PE Mjrk A H^OSO/1 PE • Rdu»"^ann PE 7ed •. PE ThomdS R AfXJerVX* AJA DondtJ C RurgdnJl Pf Thomas E Angui P£ ivn^ Mdrtdifr Pu Mc^dr« P Rdu PE Agnes M A i C P fhomji W Pierson PE C -,fxh Pf .ar'es P V j^oo PE .erry D P?rr/sch PE Kenneth P Afxsefsoo p£ K*.jtK R PoPv Pf Md H A Seti PE Gd'V W Monen Pf Od^»eJ J Ejgetron Pf Ddfyi *C A<rvchf‘'''^jr> PE Phd-p j Cdswel P£ Mark D \Jl ‘dl}«l PE 6 Jer''en p £ L P^'iiip G^#ve< m PE Kjtrn L Werner PE G^ry D k Pf ^OM f^cite' PE keth ff ripo 11 Shdwvn D Gustdfson I Cfc*<*o Ovie» PE A E'-Oion Leo M P^MveHky Haran M Oson Jdnes F Er.^»hdrtJt Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.6. Bo.x 66 Crv'stal Bav. MN 55323 Re: Albert and Sallv Hanser File No. 139-1799 Dear Jeanno: We have reviewed the site suney for the proposed pond on Lot 2, Block 1, Man.ser Addition located south of Fox Street in the Southeast Quarter of Section 3. The pond is proposed to satisfv the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The requirements specifically ask to provide one foot of sediment storage capacity which will be .satisfied. 1 he pond is proposed to be constructed in an existing low a; ja surrounded by woods. This low area is not identified as a wetland on either the DNR Protected Waters and Wetland Map or the National Wetlands Inventory Map. Tlie low area is at an elevation of 933.3 which is 1.0 feet above the OHWL of the adjacent DNR protected Browns Bay Wetland (27-855W). As this area is not a wetland, it would be an ideal location for the compensatory mitigation needed to do the City improvements on Fox Street. 1 he mitigation area must be 21,000 square feet e.xcavated down to the wetland OHW'L ot 932.3. File existing 933.3 contour is 22,700 square feet in area, and is several feet inside of the drainage easement on all sides. We recommend the proposed pond be approved by the City provided that the plan be modified to provide additional excavation out to the drainage easement limits. This additional excavation is approximately 1.0 feet deep over a 14.000 squt4re feet area. The excavated materials must be placed around the house and fenced off with Silt fence for erosion control. If there is excess excavated materials available, the City may want to utilize them to construct the embankments along I'ox Street. Coordinating the timing and logistics of this exchange should be discussed with the property owner. The wetland mitigation area should be restored by spreading salvaged topsoiporgamc materials and seeding with native grasses. The outlet culvert should be protected with silt fencing. Page 1. I39A.cor 2335 West Highway 36 * St. Pmut. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636<4600 City of Orono Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Februaiy' 5, 1993 Re: File No. 139-1799 We will forward the mitigation proposal to the DNR and Watershed for their review and comment. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours veiy- truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. SDG:li Page 2. 139 A.cor ____.Ji 8/27/92; 9/2/92; 10/6/92; J]T •5.980765FLOW AGE AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND WAIVER OF DAMAGESTHIS INDENTURE is made and entered into this day of October, 1992, by and between S. ALBERT D. HANSER (also known as Albert D. Hanser) and SALLY DODGE HANSER, husband and wife, and their heirs, devisees, assigns, and successors (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Grantors") and the CITY OF ORONO, its successors and assigns, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the Grantee.) WITNESSETH, Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and ether valuable consideration, hereby covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee the right to restrict, and Grantors agree to limit and preclude the use, improvement and development of, under the conditions and covenants herein contained, the following described property in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota; All that part of the northwesterly, northerly and southerly parts of Lot 1, all that part of the northerly, northeasterly and southerly parts of Lot 2, and all that part of the northerly, easterly and southwesterly parts of Lot 3, all in Block 1, HANSER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, as specificar/ shown and labeled as "Drainage Easement" on such recorded plat; (hereinafter referred to as "Land") as follows: Grantors hereby covenant and agree; A. No structures shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, within and above, or within and beneath the Land including without limitation, fences, fireplaces, steps, docks, piers, hardcover or roads of any nature whatsoever, or any other structure or improvement inconsistent with the natural state of the Land, save and except, however, tor that certain private driveway to be constructed near to and southwesterly of the easterly lines of Lot 2, Block 1, HANSER ADDITION in part over that portion or the "Drainage Easement" connecting the "Drainage Easement" area in Lot 2, Block 1, HANSER ADDITION, with the "Drainage Easement" area located in the northeasterly part ot Lot 3, Block 1, HANSER ADDITION; such private driveway to be constructed in accordance with the terms and provisions of that certain Private Driveway Easement and Road Maintenance Agreement executed by and between the Grantors and the purchaser of Lot 3, Block 1, HANSER ADDITION, and such driveway to be constructed in accordance with private driveway and drainage improvement plans which have been approved by the Grantee’s engineer. B. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Land except as authorized by written consent of Grantee, and except as authorized in connection with the private driveway construction provided for in paragraph l.A. above. C. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Land and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Land without the written consent of Grantee, and except as authorized in connection with the private driveway construction provided for in paragraph l.A. above. D. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land except as authorized in connection with the private driveway construction provided for in paragraph l.A. above, and no waste, trash or garbage shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land. E. No use shall be made of the Land except uses, if any, which will not change or alter the natural condition of the Land, and no use which would tend to change tne drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, fish and wildlife habitat characteristics shall be made of the Land or the water situated thereon, except for the private d-'iveway construction and use which is provided for in paragraph l.A. above. F. Grantee may enter upon the Land for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the l and without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Land, except for the private driveway and any replacements and/or reconstructions thereof provided for in paragraph LA. above. 2. Grantors hereby gram, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee, a perpetual flowago easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Land. 3. Grantors herein do hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, forever, the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from -2- ^■iTS ItliU][:«s|tlt] •N9\ raaira MKl^ira rtBt MiVtfnaTti ^I¥tl tjor»Bt /* o All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. SaXty Dodg^'Han^r STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __day of October, 1992, by S. ALBERT D. H--\NSER (also known as Albert D. Hanser) and SALLY DODGE HANSER, husband and wife. Qihn. Tliis Instrument was drafted by: Dorsey & VVhimey (JJT) 2200 First bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 NOTARY PUBLIC SHERRI OLSON NOTARY PUBUC MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY : My Commsann Ei^rn July S. 996 ; *iN.’ r,^s; * yLi-.f. -4- ♦ • • • • *» I •• • • • • \ •••••••(•l.t.i ..................................;•••• t*«* a, 1 i : ; I ’ • . t I I I I : : I ; • f • ‘ • 1 * •i I ! : } 5J‘****** **?**?**r**?**f**?**?**r**;**| i • ‘ I :: i : *•••••>* ::::::: r : J ! :• * \ i : : * * • • ^ i M ^ ^ i ^ M 5 : :• • -.............I..................... . t . . I ! I i - , : i : ; : i ; i ; I MHiinimmm ••••« ro 935J78 • • f • < • . < • • * « • f « .• »**•«• * * t t • t • • • ♦« ♦ * « ♦ **{'■*• J t * I I I . i i i ! ! i ; : 5 »4d.O ‘1 : : : : *********••••«•••••••••••(• i { ! ! • « • • I • i : I •• ; ! ! i €00^ €«lSTlfV0 DRlVt I ! ; M : 1 M i il M M ‘ * -j i ’ aa.aa.aa,, : i : i i i : ; i i M : M I M h : : i : : : : : I :: ! : i i : ; i • • • • j * * I I I ’ ^ I I j ...............................................................S ......................* . i i : I : ; i I; ; : i i i ; : ; i: Innimmmn • • • • J........................... :::::::::::::: ::::::::: i — M t ; •• .^ • «I ; ; : i i i i; i i i i i i I i : : i • f! ; i ; .................MunninMn : : : M • • ! • • • i ‘ : W <m«|: ♦•••••••••• • •• i V »• « ; : : " t>l I :i_ (O ^ i :5B|gn i : I } i • • : • ; ; ; I ► < m t) I I s It O r-< •^ 1 !; ^ *' <II i1 iP* o ^ i ..... M* « • / / w : Tw ui i i : ; i b I • • • « I : t ..:. .... i • • ♦ • •# : : ! L ! : • • i ■ ‘ — I :: i i : : : i i ; i: i: : i ; ; : : I: i .. iV \; >« i :. ) • ! • • • • ■ * ! • ♦ i *. I I i I j 1 : ; * • “ I j-i f • a••*.»I.,V,a***'. s nnnni^;: ......a..I I I t I I I • ♦•...I. ...a.* • ‘••••Z......!*•♦••• I............................... I: M h ; i i: M H ; n ; : : : * • • * • • • - - » - •• • !•!****■ r : I• • • • I ! T «*ia,. I, i g «c f? *0 i ^ o L < •^ m : ** •• II • ....r"‘6 ’’'o»""”"_'T• ^ o > P iji ; 1 I I# ! I r I m o : : : i : ^ » « • i ..•..••••.•••....aaaa.a, ',4,aa*i».i.«i.,'.,, \ • • « « « I i it ; T ♦ • « • 4 *} ) I J ;n '• ...».|i ................................... 'tt: I !*i ; i.; • •j «••••••«♦ • • 2 • i • I j r ; ! • • I.................................... r♦p n ? . ; . : i * ' ' i • 2^‘ * • • • • ! ‘Sil ‘ ^ J I • ^ t ! : ; : : ' ...................................... • ' , s: ••♦••♦.•<•••«'• 4 f , . 4 I* , fa n I ♦♦•• •'•4i4*. • %• 4*4 4 4 • La»* i • » • 4 * aJIu tiV * ****i»*»44«4« i; ; i i i ; ; ;J I Jg i i : ■ =: i; M : i i: ^ ; ] i i ; i 1 : I : i :•: : : ••••• • •444«444»t %«*>4 ? : "i„ .......i..............I------ i!i • « ! i \ I t : . J : t ! I I f ^'•A y / »4tC \ N^r’ y> ^V' ^7/—1 ,cA .cP^A \> ®!C y [«44 4) \rt./ ;/ X. VL, .■N. •ts»’/uunt N 1-.y \ N •V n ''A y'roci h»m.r=4o 4 I #-• V \ c»*>. \ \ V'X *5eeciftiiit ^ X 'f \ y y y y \ ' I I 4 I I % ^ * y ^ ✓ « / .0^!^ •* • £o 'h % N . >Sr, .% X ^> > _ y <f«i ;s«N ^ ' O. 8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: I'S’S-Lot 2, Block 1, HANSER ADDITION. aa V-i- This survey intends to show the bound­ aries of the above described prop­ erty, and the proposed location of a proposed house. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 0 : Iron marker euo^0Af (114 s) : Spot elevation, mean sea level {fjuyj datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. yi3fi5 4f £^*4Mf ij ^ (t • f^T,0 94^4^4^ /^/Wa • 9^9. m $} % ff§, ^ ■wi# ^ I \wTfk^ crriify Uul lh» M*rvv> w*» prrfarrd b) inr or lindrr my <te*rt Mprr LMII tt-£f-^t TO; FROM; DATE; Mayor Callahan ar.d Orono Counciimcmbers Ron Moorsc, City Adminisuator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building U Zoning Administrator February 18, 1993 COUNQLMplNi FEB 2 2 1993 CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT; #1801 E. W. Blanch (Kirk Sherman). 2505 Old Beach Road - Variance Resolution Brief Review of Application E. W. Blanch, the owner of the property, along wu: Kirk Sherman, the piMential buyer, have applied for a height variance for a new residence sin* * are to be located on Lot 5 of the Marsh at Uifayette. This would be the first variance to the allowed budding height section since iht! code was adopted in February of 1992. Applicant’s hardship statement is set forth in E/nibils B 1-3. ■fiiC Planning Commission unanimously approved the variance application as proposed and accepted most of the hardships noted by applicant. The enclosed resolution is adopted per the Planning Cominission’s recommendation approving a 4’10" height variance. ch CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING KILE /'180 1 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 2/18/93 TO:E. W. Blanch Co. 3500 West 80Ui Street Minneapolis, MN 55431 ATTN: Shaun O'Laughlin COPIES TO:Kirk Sherman 4005 IDS Tower 80 South 8th Street MinrEapolis, MN 55402 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance \’OTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINSTDATE OK MEETING: 2/16/93 Planning Commi.ssion recommends the following: Planning Commission recommended approval ot application as submitted. The enclosed approval resolution will be presented for Council’s formal action at their February 22, 1993 meeting. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any questions pertaining to the findings or conditions set forth in the enclosed resolution. I i A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (A) FILE #1801 WHEREAS, E. W. Blanch Company, a limited pannership (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 2505 Old Beach Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 5. Block I, the Marsh at Lafayette, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit the construction of a residence that will be 34 ’10" in heicht where only a 30’ height is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1801. The property is located in the RR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, requiring 1 .icre in area. The propeny consists of 3.16 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 16. !993 an<l recommended approval of the proposed variance ba.sed ufH^n the following haidships and findings: The proposed house will be set back 267 ’ from the Old Beach Road right- of-way. The total height of the proposed structure would be perceived as lower than the e.sisting adjacent structures that are located at 35’ and 50’ setbacks from the street. Page 1 of 5 The location of all the residential stnictures for the Marsh at I^fayette were established by recorded soil borings determined to be the most suitable for building. If there is to be a basement for a residence structiirt*, the basement levels would be above finished grade based on the elevation of the flood plain and the need to build at least 1 ’ above the flood plain elevation. Structures on Lots 4 and 6 based on sloping grades with walkouts and the design of the roof are allowed a total building height of 42’. The total building height for proposed residence on Lot 5 is 34’10" as measured from the highest existing elevation 939.1. The grade is consistent around all elevations of the proposed building. The house on Lot 6 measures 30’ from the street side and 39’ to the rear. The house on Lot 4 measures 30’ from the street yard and 41’ from the rear. Tlie proposed house on Lot 5 will acmally be 6 ’ lower than the adjacent residences. A classic 2 1/2 story colonial with mansard roof could not be built based on the limitations of the building height section and the flood plain elevation and could only be installed with a walkout design which may not be suited for a traditional colonial style. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propeny are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting tlie variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properly; would not merely sc’ve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial propert)’ right of ;'»ic applicant, and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Tlie City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommend.uions of the Planning Commission, reports by City s»aff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safet>’ and Page 2 of 5 welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grams a variance to Municipal Zoning Ccxle Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit the construction of a new principal structure to be built at a maximum height of 34 ’10" instead of the allowed 30’, subject to the following conditions: 1 Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 22, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically termina.e any authority granted herein, and sliall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned authorized agent of the E. W. Blanch Company has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of E. W. Blanch Company, a limited partnership, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the propert}'. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of February, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothv M. Hallin, Cit\' Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owncr(s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of F'ebruar}’, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallii, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 7 TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:Februar)' 9, 1993 SUBJECT: #1801 Kirk Sherman, 2505 Old Beach Road - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.02, Subd. 13 Building Height. "The vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or 10’ above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower and the top of the cornice of a flat roof, or the deck line of a mansard roof or the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Topographic changes which elevate the adjoining ground level above the existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building height. Adopted: 2/24/92. With the adoption of this amendment, building height, no longer was to be determined at final grade but from existing contours." Applicant seeks height variance; Allowed = 30’ Proposed = 34’10" Variance = 4*10" or i^% Section 10.03, Subd. 14(c) Lot Coverage. Lot coverage standards do not apply af property exceeds 1.99 acres. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 Hardcover. 250-500’ setback = 137,650 s.f. Proposed = 12,510 s.f. or 9% (allowed = 30%) List of E.\bibits A - Application B - 1-3 Hardship Statement C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Plat of Marsh of I jfayette F - U)t 5 Site Plan G - Lot 4 Site Plan H lajt 6 Site Plan I - Topographic .Map J - Hardcover Facts K - 1 Drainage Grading and Utility Plan for the Marsh of lafayette K-2 Site Section Zoning File /!^1801 Februar)' 9, 1993 I\ice 2 L - Map of Treed Areas M - Building Section N - Demonstration Building Height Section O - Elevations P - Letters of Support - Affected Property Owners Q - Survey/Topographic Information R - Map of Soil Borings S - Log of Borings/Lot 5 Description of Request Applicant seeks a height variance to the newly amended section of the code dealing with controls on building height. Height is now to be governed by existing elevations and not final proposed elevations. In this case, review Exliibit Q, the vertical distance was determined from the highest adjoining ground level (939.1’) as it proved to be lower than the lowest ground level plus 10’. Proposed home is designed with a mansard roof based on the code section the measurement is taken to the deck line of the mansard roof, refer to Exhibit M. Applicant notes that if structure was designed with a gable roof there would be no height problem, refer to Exhibit N. The applicant advises that based on the new interpretation of allowed height that 2 1/2 story' colonial homes with mansard roofs and full basements would technically not be allowed in the City. The impact is intensified for this property win full basement as the structure must be raised to meet required 1’ separation from adjacent uood plain or OHW of wetlands at 932 elevation. In this application, tlie first floor elevation is 3’ above grade. Please review Exhibit B 1*3, the very complete hardshi'' statement prepared by Shawn T. O’Laughlin. Review of Hardships 1.Review Exhibits K 1-2, proposed house on Lot 5 is -setback approximately 267 ’ from Old Beach Road. The total height of the proposed structure would be perceived as lower than the existing adjacent structures. The locations of all the structures were established by recorded soil borings determined to be the most suitable for building. If there is to be a basement, basement levels would be above finished grade based on the flood plain of the area. 3.Structures on Lots 4 and 6 based on sloping grades w ith walkout and the design of tlie roof are allowed a total building height of 42 ’. Zoning File i^^lSOl February 9, 1993 Page 3 4. Total building height of Lot 5 is 34’10" as measured from the highest existing elevation 939.1’ grade. This height is consistent around all elevations of the proposed buiL ing. Whereas house on LcU 6 measures 30 ’ from the street side and 39’ to the rear. House on Lot 4 measures 30 ’ from the street yard and 41’ from rear yard. 5. Applicant notes house on Lot 5 will actually be 6’ lower than the adjacent residences. 6. A classic 2 1/2 story colonial with mansard roof and as further described in hardship #4 could not be built based on the limitations of the building height section and could only be installed with a walkout design which applicant claims is not really suited for the traditional colonial style. Please note all propenies within the City are subject to the height regulations - not just lakcshore. Issues for Consideration 1. 3. 4. What hardships are valid in the variance request? What findings are valid in the variance request? What was the intent of the building height code amendment? What is your response when applicant ’s consultant claims this specific design o', home cannot be built in the City because of the approval method of determining allowed height of structure. What will be .the real impact of this structu on the immediate neighborhood? Does the area of the lot. proposed setbacks, the unique physical feanire or adjacent land uses have any bearing in your determination? CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varianc Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Va t..' ■] ■•'’510 / * site Address bg?T <5 . gjocfc. I , Q Property Identif. Number (P.I.P.) ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required purve^^ Presenf^use of property: residential Zoning District: Date Property Acquired I (do)tflTo JCL®d> also own tl\e aijjacent parcels of land (month/year) lane other(specify) CITY OF CTwHO fh ^ance office 1 350200000 01 CEH 175.0. CHECK JL 175.0^ HECEIRT-THm YOU i(263720 cool fiOl TQ9 n ^ APPLICANT Name Phone (home) )si/Af Phone (work) AddressCity; - - - - - Zip; &$4gl_ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) N/A Name P. W A/i. UTO (5>TN^^ Phone (work)i|fl3S[e ----- Address: !^I5D0 Wetf City; _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated^Construction Cost $ i-^T 4^1,000. OOP • OllfeD I n^J,/\ai/krt rfiAoirr\ qoo.^ T )Ja7i^^ce. arAf3±^Describe request in detai^: QtfP* fig----- ....................... VARIANCES REQUIRED I Lot Area Setback: Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore ' ii X°ther (specify )<%e^iT&eO SLCta ^ HARDSUIPA>ESCRIPTI0N OF UNUSUAL PROPliKTY CONDITIONS Describe undue 'lardship or practical difficulty and unusual conditio;.s prfv-tin, ^^ zjZZS dlL bui^i l ar ~ ~ ic-hT L (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTT^S All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1./y Completed Application Form 2» Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. 1 at Map (obtained with property owners list). 4.Sc Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J5 ”xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*j"xll"). 6. \ ^Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8h"xll ’'). 7. xAs an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date / / OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of/-this xequest. Owner's Signature -Date 1 '1A ^2 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled revlcjw meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting^ please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. e ■I j:r r. • ifl f r' J J J i 4 •*v .1 :• 'A X f • i / '. r .} STATEMENTS OF PROPOSED HARDSHIPS The RunyanA''ogel Group, Inc. Architects Sherman Residence - Lot #5, Marsh at Lafayette Hardship n "Mansard" roof versus a "Gabled" roof: The definition of building height, Section #13 of the adopted City building ordinance does not clearly define the term "mansard". • The total building height of a "gabled" roof building is defined by measuring 30'-0" from the lowest grade elevation to the midpoint or the average mean point of the roof, see plate #5. • Th2 total building height of a "mansard" roof building is defined by measuring 30'-0" from the lowest grade elevation to the deck of the roof, see plate #4. Hardship: The definition of building height becomes a non-issue when the proposed building is setback 267' from Old Beach Road, see site section plate #2. The driving force behind U:e determination of this setback is to locate the proposed building where the best known soils exist to support a built improvement, see plate #1. The total height of the propo^ design would be perceived as lower than any other existing adjacent structures. Please note, the building pads located on plate #l are city approved and are recorded on the plat documents. The building pads and finish floor elevations were established by recorded soil borings which determined the most suitable, buildable soils abc vc the floodplain elevation for each lot. All basement floor elevations are to be a minimum of 2'-0" above the establislied floodplain elevation of 931.5. For this reason, the first floor elevation of the proposed building on Lot #5 is 3'-0" above grade and the residence is therefore "lifted" out of the ground. Sec dimensions on plate 92. Hardships January 15, 1993 Page Two HARDSHIP n Lot H and Lot #6 are adjacent lots to the subject property. Both lots are sloping grade "walk ­ out" lots, and therefore by Sec. 10.75, Subd. 3 of the adopted ordinances are allowed a total building height of 42', which if the roofs were gabled, the measurement is taken to the average mean point of the roof. Lot #6 (currently under construction) is setback 50'-0" from Old Beach Road for best case soils. The total building height is 30'-0" as measured from the front yard existing grade, and is 39'-0" as measured from the back yard existing grade. Lot 1^5 (The Proposed Subject Residence) is setback 267' 0" from Old Beach Road for best case soils. The total building height is 34'-10" as measured from the lowest grade; this height is consistent around all elevations of the proposed building. Lot H (completed Parade of Homes ’92 model) is setback 3Q'-Q!. froni Old Beach Road tor best case soils. The total building height is 30'-0" as m^ured from the front yard existing grade, and is 4l'-0" as measured from Uie back yard existing grade. The proposed building on Lot #5 will actually be 6'-0” lower than the adjacent lot residency. The proposed residence is not relatable, in terms of height and scale, to any man-made physical structure or improvement, see plate !f\ and #2. H ardship The Marsh at Lafayette is a total seven lot platted development. Lot #5, ^e subject property reauesting variance, is the only on-grade site of the development which is restricts by city ordinance to a total building height of 30'-0" and not subject to a 12-0 height addition ^ ouUined in Section 10.75 subdivision 3 of the city ordinance. Hypotheti^ly, the improvement on 1-ot should be the shortest building of the development, regardless ot its setback, grade elevations, and design. HARDSHIP #4 Adopted City Ordinances of the City of Orono are not conducive to building a tradition^ Colonial residence exemplary of the true style; two and a half story building, high rloor to floor ceilings, raised front portico entry, shed rtxif design with attic/storage spa^, an clerestory basement windows. A walkout lot is the only site scenario on which a coloni^ home might be able to exist in the City of Orono, although a walk out lot is not suited for the traditional colonial stvle. Hardships January 15, 1993 Page Three HARDSHIP #5 The intent of the adopted building ordinance Section 10.24 suod. 5A. creates a "blanket" condition restricting building heights within a lakeshore residential district; that is to say, homes along the lakeshore. The ordinance goes further to exclude the proposed Lot #5 residence because the ordinance does not ever consider or speak to specific or unique site conditions that exist on the proposed Lot #5, as well as any of the sensitive design issues that have been resolved undetectable within the building design. See and review all plates: • Platted building pads • Existing trees • Site section • Building elevations • Building section • Neighbor testimonials Lo\.n Lot #4 Lot #6 Plate No. 1 Plate No. 3 Plate No. 2 Plate No. 6 Plate No. 4 and 7 Plate No. 8 Plate No. 9 Plate No. 10 m JRUN DATE 01/ll/n BATCH 002 MTNNCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHT^RS LIST REPORT NO. PIA35A01 PAGE 3PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-25 11 0038 02520 SNAOYHOOO RD FRESHHATER FOUNDATION FRESKNATER FOUIR)ATION 725 CO RD 6 NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 11 003900038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO H’ESIIHATER FOUNDATION FRCSMHATER FOUNDATION 725 CO RD 6 NAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 000302990 OLD BEACH RD EARL A SHEEN EARL A SNEEN 2990 OLD BEACH RD NAYZATA m 55391 J PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 21-117-23 22 0009 02980 OLD BEACH RD H N I K A HODARES MICHAEL M i KATHY A HODARES 2980 OLO BEACH RD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0005 02990 OLD BEACH RD MINVESCO CORPORATION MINVESCO CORPORATION 9372 CREEKHOOD DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55399 38 21-117-23 22 0017 02955 OLD BEACH RD R C RICHNOOD COMPANY INC R C RICHNOOD COMPANY INC 13780 REIMER DR 8B MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 21-117-23 22 0018 02505 OLO BEACH RD E N BLANCH CO LTD PTNSHP E H BLANCH CO LTS PHCMP 3500 N BOTH ST MPLS m 55931 38 21-117-25 22 0019 02535 OLO BEACH RD R C RICHNOOD CO INC R C RICHNOOD CO INC 13780 REIMER DR 88 MAPLE GROVE MN 55311 TOTAL BATCH 002 00008 i*'>.■ K f >. » i- 1 CIRTirV THAT THE TACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEt*«PlN COUNTT DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY RNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE ( . * rli ■T ✓ 43^ * I THE MARSH AT LAFAYETTE R.T. DOC. NO. C.R. DOC.no .*•»€** f <0r -*v I .r* t^TAlL '10 SC«LC /“ / * «ArrjSt fl ’IS F'HK.\S£.NV ;.^*VN» L A- —Vif 1?,M fjo J4<; L_____ • ;.Y AVf v.<:afj • M*.'< too • •rv'iTM rmmt iic«r-«r>Mr ftaUHlU. fe^lUMtUI.MtUt *..a.n:;3C‘N| » V #-'^r #<#i« 4, •g .rvA* •tmmfft 0^ P>0*4 •»ar««a»%’ T«» im< #f ?!*• Ib,4r*»i ?t {••I •MMfcMaivfl|) ««4 i« fM« »f |K« MtilMatl mt Lat 1« •!•«& I, IM n*AUI AT UUAICm. tUoallM . ««l.lt laai IR.C.V.t.l M^rrt II AM MfO M Ml Atfti»> MTW Miurr urn maimci CAttMnrrt mm imi *■ ‘—too -. i___ m OtTMI. A'C-!4^\.4 ^ \'n . 40* fit | >r/«/ //%• •’'■4 V ..V \ mik % m rtn it vtofo omm onH»«itf imcatM H?*!*'** *** liwi 0m> it.M rttf •■ Mioni wtui •m I*M MO MJMOJK ■IM-irjrtfltt •nrtfi iAiiitL LAJIO tint loot. INC. SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEET ^ -1 i.c. mcHina) togs® Ifood Ntab $»t Por bcAvitldi Gbly— taetM Surf act I>ralnt«t OMottt Propoatd Eltvatloi 4t«*^0«Mitaa Fltvation lypt of ftUldlnt - /^// ^ Prc^rty locatad 1a Section 21, TcatiaMp 117, Ru«t 25. HantBin Ceiaitr, MimMota LOT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC.LAND 8UHT1T0»MOIfTtMD UNUCS LAW OV WAT* Of MINNISOTAItOI 'TIN AMMHartn M42AMtaniiaNli, ^tfftrsm Srrttflritf fflVOlCf NO -p.i no._Z5£J1jir•CALirO-OCNOTESISON V /> — nC. - - /V Cl«i/ » * / \ V f I \\\ txr - *|4 > •H 'fr? / O ^ aoearr^'tl '1fJ\ — • bto.co - - M tladi Pripnaei Hoof ^45 7, fYo^oatd LoMaat Floor ^no <• Sl«cA 1. 1»« NWMI at LaFAIFm WoiOy Mrwiww »—o t t—opniiaiOMa a wao*»^iu» — I a«i i*M» •• taM^<tar«a» •* t« i*M OMT ««M lano «iO iN» a it awl «i*nn M«W»W n 0 «F<v »>«*• • MM t»M ____• *1 . vy A c. Ntytt id A M M. ^ . I- !■--1 t.c. noinr ocnotutignQ taotM Itood Mib Set Nr bicaYitiim Oily DwotM 9MKir« Drrlnaft ItaBotts hriKiMd Elrvetidi ^^0 0»6trt BiliUAi Klevetlcm Type of Outlding - -^3it f9fo / k 'sjtsv ^ Property lorac««l In Section 20. ToMt^lp lir.lMUIt 23. Hmifpin Coiatty, Minn^^oto LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.LAND nmVKTORSlUfiimiitii i/NocA LAWS or vtats op Minnesota1Ml • 1A0 N«rtA Pit IttJ iitnfgon iftltfUctr INVOICI P .S NO SCALI0- OCNOTCSIRON , - - OliVl • / / / -------- - /^*».25 - «•. ♦ \ \ \ T - — WMpf-- - . I ___I-------------- --------------------- f',*,. L-* t.^1^ ifl 2; 7^ -.T". 4 : M, * • - • oo - - - 54O.0r7 ----- T.r ft ttock ftlVOMtf ClM* fUM ^^i-7 fnyoood Lorett Floor tot §• Slocb 1, TIC MMMI AT UfATmt i«<novoo»*»<oimioo70«qi>»M' ^ mm * »*kl Ww <r« I« Oi Nr«e»^ arvl —■ 4 OH **•«•«• OR MM «|Ml omh utobcf •• fI _ • • r-^ . • # A ■ • •! 1 ’ ' Vw>”' fIsvdUMA rfwcii Rsn Ni> t’4' / O * r* ^ ' ^ .»: hardcover CALCUIJ^TIQN WORKSHEET Existing Ha ^ove^»^2one A, ■ House length X X X ,. Garage * c. Drivehg V * 1 g- D.. Sidewalk . X X £. Patio / D eck X X X F,Landscape areasUNDERLAIN by •. -— plastic SHEETING G, Other X X X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in ^ne ^4"0 • . S.F. WIDTH •^20 _ S.F. • • . S.F. # • 5a F • s So F« 'hlr ^0 WtfiO S.F. l(rr’57(^0 S.F. «Z^<<f«?.S.F. __SL_- 1 *5P. S.F. .. S.F. S.F. S.F. - _s.p. S.F. «B *__ 5>«P# s>r* ^ S.F. l^.gl^G.F. 13 *>1 '/rgO- S.F. [j~ ...X100-_3— ^£6lPt?NCcr, r $ . DRAINAGE . GRADING . a UTILITY PLAN THE MARSH AT LAFAYETTE ORONO/MINNETONKA BEACH.MINNESOTA — = 7 I V •. 7 . , !.rpsTn.. , J 1__ TZ=^\\‘ / ‘i A ^ ••**“* *^^ -Tm-V 12 AC GOVERNMENT PROTECTED WETLAND 6EC ‘Tif?^ ,|h **« tm» m <«• • • flM I ■W • • »»»*—^'. «-• « ' • ■* *“'• o- >» ■ :r.: M M I M • , I •.................. ^ tai* •< -a*. » »• «,* • * •€ » »• f -mm ^«Mt *-y*gA» * -• « «*!r * ’ *iMiCiAlli II«L *^ ••*•**••• .?'*•• •»(«* •») ^ tUWW. • ••. *• 4 • •»«•» • .••! - • t •» « ■• • ^—t;.- jm * ^ .,«« •• • “ PI ATP #1 tHtRl'NvAN 'L'Orrir i! '■ S!■ I I.tV Mcrrt:l^eoF WtfCTfltJWtCP pt9 ftf^ 0\ir^piN>sslce wnftcTfvgmg^ P*lpi?6 W^W? ^T4Svi Tpe F^F; NMpfciisfT ^ <9^6we l^tir .(• •tma^ l»»4« ^ _______ -r/^v .'• • 9 1 ,^V;r;:.:rf___ <S4U (1- «\iUXIf K«UP>»i^ *^.%0 u«r<* . •• . tow* toi; <««.••« C.»>^ lA »•« tn n »n »•••••# to*« t« —»^0 Atoi^ MM#. •»**•*. •-- >.«4 — __ _ *•« fovA. w “--.I r-f^0rt0 «>«f <toJtu% »«Ai «*.M r^A^rUi^ wn# .JMuw •r% «^t %- ------------------— ^***^ ;» MCm ^to#. Mto4 - il*Mi>i Ma— ------------- ss :m •1*«»T »f toTMMm hM y<^ ^ to .to4 toto »«to#|^*toM »to* ^^*0% 1 :cmxi C^\w\hr^\ou gjLC^ tbc^\c^ f /‘•V-'-ft? _veer »ofJ me i RUNYAN/VOCtLtji.xjr^ #>yi *«.AMXtfC'S M«. n M#« m IM U* ■* t 'V toMt^ *■ — ■*. »*W« M«'t *»•*»• *-M ••• •<• 1^ «••* • •••» #••* •» • ♦ »«» • -••»• M* » «M to •« •>• » «.«» • • • •»•*» *^ »*••«• • M> ^ • •to to •««■«• • ,»iM • to ••■••• r .to ^ •!. <to.toto < ¥ ^L fM toto^4« »t 1^ M |. *•. ^S3t«0« to-Tto« 5 >}• .A IIWti '~‘0x \1 _s ------- SZ.^ I-.1TJ tLli ,UJL <------A i- EoanaiEicj ^ j t «lkft 9$^^-U^ "i at. )— — iW); Nte,«4W"* • ^t'c;r-k m maifi D Ai)..............' M---- i W O ir:.-...- ra EB XT ~ n —^A> L r J M/i)i‘ .- .i*' ,Fca4L puev^TIftM •»ftjpg ptgyATio»4 > ifc J^£f* ___«UtVA7 1 hitRUNYAN \I H Jl »€ nMw-wxm owoi» we «MMttcr% WOWWMWi *•••'u *»i »*• i* •*••»-. • •» ►•••* •«•««> *-• •-^ ■ _— «»•»«>■•*• ^ **»»—T- *?_■'*_*^** _** »•*». »a 4TTW • I 4 4|, nim^ " wp e I, I ti-tCSTStjC m N > u H h r»KT;Hfi r^ikwc* 01.21.100T. lo.ir. "pon R.c. sichuooc . co I U W*N»•RICHWOOPH o ivi E s fJanuary 20, 1993 • i,VCity OF Orono 1335 Brown Rd. P.O. Box 66 Crjfstal Bay, Wl 55323 Attn: Jean A. Mabusth Dear Jean, A4 you well know I am aware of the variance re<mest submittal by Kirk Sherman for Lot # 5 The Marsh at Lafayette. I don't think there is ar'» issue here whether the ^rlance should ^ granted. I think the xiildini, proposal n.» s®***^^*achieves the ordinance.* intent to limit building height. Th^ropc^ residence will be less of an Impact on the existing neighborhood then any hone structure within the area. Currently I own the adjacent Lot #A resident idiich was in ^ ***’*1?^ of Homes, 1 have had recent conversations with two prosprctive buyers for this home although each has expressed an inter«t to i buvers until they better kriow that for sure the proposed resid«ice for Lot #5 Is cp*anted city approval. I therefore look to the city for support and hope that the necessary governing bodies can reselve this issue. •J Sincerely, iMflfuiu) Richard K. Kalow President/ CEO : #8 13780 Ruhtnm Drive. Suite 8 Mapm Grova. MN &63B9 (612) 420 3357 A Divwion e? n C Ricnv*ood C^jupany. tnc. TO TCL P. PLATt #9 Januaiy 21, 1993Jean A. Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box C6 Orono, Minnesota 55323-0066 My wife and I are currently building a home at Lx>t ^6, the Marsh at Lafayette. Shaun O’Laughlin, our architect, has informed us that he is submitting a variance request for the building height for our proposed neighbor ’s residence on Lot 05. Wo have reviewed the building plans and a location plan of this proposed residence. We are strongly in favor of its design and are not concerned with the building ’s height. This home will be almost 275' away from ours, and if you could just walk the land, you would agree the house on Lot #5 will not impose on anyone. We are probably the only lot owners that might have a concern. We are in favor of the variance request. Hi jSTSRmijm MCt < \l3f3 I V"' 3'-'’ / .P—-*-■•14o.o -.- .jp\ \>K is tv: * H f 1 "9-----r~,j: v-l5 a. i ♦ O ' 364: 56'4.- \ ' #3 I # % 0»«r\ *.\ Vn \ fi jj Is t 0 rH» 1'«>>r 6 I 1 I 01 o 8 p Ji 9 o ■ k <« y »>j > 4 \' \i V. ; & ••jf rt» il •4* •d ’i'.o 'a y \ t 8 i f / c \ \ * LEGENn ^ - APPROXIMATE LnCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DURING. DF - PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR 6IUM4 MY: UAJ »T. ~Hv” H» «Aex B2-ui omm. 92\33 scAti: \* m 200’ »C(T 1 GFOTFCHNICAL FVALUAIION TKt MARSH A1 LA^ ArFUt Lors » ntl«)U(4l 7, IM(7CK I 01U (liACH HOAI> ORONO / MTKA HLAUi. MN BENCHMARK! TOP NUT FIRE HYDRANT ELV. = 955 E9 r BRAUN INTERTEC 7S I ] i ] ] ] i] 1 1 1 1 1 J J r i r <rr-LOG OF BORING PROJECT: BABX-92-133 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION The Marsh at Lafayette Lots 1 Through 7, Block 1 Orono/Mtka. Beach, Minnesota BORING:ST-5 LOCATION: Lot 5, Block 1. DATE: 3/26/92 SCALE: r = 4 ’ Elev. 939.2 Depth 937J 935.2 932.2 930.2 927.2 ^8.7 0.0 1.5" 4.0 ASTM Symbol Description of Materials (ASTM D2488) 7JI 9.0 ML 12.0 SM LEAN CLAY, with Fibers, dark bro'vn, v.et. (Topsoil) BPF WL Tests Notes LEAN CLAY, with a trace of Fibers and lenses of POORLY GR.\DED SAND, brown, wet. medium. (Alluvium) SILT, grayish-brown, wet. loose. (Alluvium) m 203 SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, grayish-brown with iron staining, wet, stiff. (Glacial Till) SiLTY”SAND, "fine to medium-grained, with a trace of fine Gravel and lenses of POORLY GRADED SAND, brown, moist to wet. medium dense. (Glacial Till) SANDY ’LE"a 'N~Clay, with a trace of fine to coarse Gravel, grayish-brown, wet, rather stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) 15 END OF BORING. Water not observ'cd with 10* of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 17’ immediately after wiilidrawal of auger. Water down 4 ’ 1 day after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BAB.X-921J3 Ertun Imer^ec M.C. » 255; M.C. - 305; L.L. - 46 P.I. - 18 ST-5 ?*ge 1 o( I 02/18/93 10:50 THU bones - ^ 1 Bonestroo Rosens Anderlik& Associates a* tote^ * c n 44rvm i f 1 1 u CaetL ff tfVSPVf\ > NTM-V ff Vtfn M c KA rfiAh.#f¥ wu— R O O •=: S- O C I T E £i P . O 2 En9lnetrs & Architects tKtfOKV *i. uthKCanv *i- Mwn < *i- •cam w tvm a iomtt.n- icbtn C Ajon. jC»r, A (M«r. »I W4it K H$ntar- U Mc^kRl KATUm *1. Tww » A-\»n«V Al A OrAjr; C U r>wmji< U kffl^i Mtnf<n. V- MDW#i ^ flB/. M AJCf. rf%smi u/ f^fvnorw f r Lv-^ rf A4IU^ ^ff 4iry 0 If l^nr«h ^ wpwv ff f Mv ^1 A. tapl M 0^ gi/ A49nen. f £ 04^ J U9MBT. *1 Oiry K. uncT««vwi f f ^ i C«^ *f Mvfe o uni jm^fTk ft i fnH» Um l Wwrr. H O »yrw««i# f # f iMl Vfrn f f iftA I XiftJU 0 ^lAUtiOl ft Cf<s? C*fP» CrfTfN *s fiwi /e^ Ur>M fA-^v KM>M 01^ Mn * (rv^w^ Y February 17, N93 'c.J - City i^f Oreno P.O. Box 66 Orono. MN 55323 ^//y %9 Attn: Jcar.ne Mabusth Rc:Top»cgr!iphic Mapping Our File No. 13^3 Dear Jeanne: Enclosed Dleast find tht proposal from Hnrlmrs, Inc^ for Topciraphb Mapping Work. The pt0|l<.al i^edcs an cp-.ion for Big Wend that tan he accepted by the City if desired. S34.64n $31,220 The followng is a suramary of the Topographic Ivfapp’^g T<^pographic Mapping (inclutl:ng Big Island) Topographic Mapping (cxcluoing Big Island) The budEct included $50,000 fox this •'J'Ork. Tht area to be mapped includes 9,600 arrn in'^tei; .C« is land. The CCS. per acre of land fcr the map^g .. « suSitly higher than the S6.?0 per acre «e paid for the^ fencnsivc lake area whJch results in odd lend shapes. Inaeuttontothehc:^ ' eiJiliir.o spend app.-rndmately $1,500 for .setting up the mapping and printing cosu. We would recommend that Horiicn be ordered to c-omplctc the tcpograp.hicsvoik for the amount Hi 534,640, which Includes Big iJlaehd. If you have n?iy questums, please contact this office. Sirwrely, BCNESTROO. ROSENEs ANDERUK & ASSOGaTES. INC. Glenn R CtK»k IIOKI/mS. l\C. \ri i.il M.ipiiiii:: riolr>Niun«jl VAIN OFFICE 3600 Jot Drive • F0 9 ok313A Rapid City SD 57709-3^3*1 P”one (605) 3A3-0280 ViDV/EST DIVISION ^ Opus 2 • 6125 Blue C 'de Dr. M'nnetonWa. MN 55343 Phone (612) 931*9069 Febniarv 8, 109.1 City of Orono c/o Mr Glenn Cook Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc 2335 West Highway 36 St Paul, MN55113 RE: HE-1649 Dear Ntr Cook: . •• j Reference is made to >our initial telephone conversation of January 26, 1993 and our recent telephone conversations Accordingly, we are pleased to furnish our proposal for aerial survey services for the C'ity ot Orono. \1N. Details ot our proposal are described below. PROIKCT ARK A The areas covered by this prop(>sal are shown on the attached map with Big Island being an option. AFRIAL PHOTOGRAPHY W’e will obtain new aerial photography in the spring of 1993 as soon as ground, leaf and weather conditions permit This photography will be obtained with a precision mapping camera and will be suitable for preparing the topographic mapping described below Deliverv ^vill consist of one set of 9" x 9" contact prints G ROI ;ND CONTROL Horizons, Inc will tlimish the ground control necessary' for ccmtrolling the topographic mapping The vertical datum will be based on U S G S elevations and horizontal control based on Minnesota State Plane Coordinate System We will use the same datum as last year’s mapping DK.ITAI, TOP<K;RAPHTC MAPPING_1 =* 100’ We will furnish the maps at a scale of I" * 190' showing contours at two toot intervals In addition to contours, the maps will include spot elevations, roads, buildings, main dnveways. railroads, major fences, drainage, shorelines, swamps and tree outlines to the extent that these features are visible on *he photography It areas are obscured, the contours will be dashed to indicate they are approximate I Delivery will consist of computer drafled mylars in one-C|iiarter section foruiat We will also deliver the dieital mapping on diskettes in an Autocad Drawing File or DXF (Autocad) File Format to be determined by you Please discuss delivery format with Ms Lisa S 'aman (I -800-658-3613) If delivery is desired in another software format, we reserve the right to review our prices MAP KFATLRF.S & CONTENT ^ I" ^ 100' scale LAND USE FACILITIES NATURAL FEATURES Parks (sidewalks, fences, tiees) Golf Courses Boundaries Cemeteries Boundaries Mobile Home Park Fioundaries (no individual mobile homes) Mines/Onarry Boundaries Annotation on all above Trees Rivers Drains Lakes & Ponds Swamps STRUCTUR TS TOPOC,R\PHir FEATURES Roads, Urban (fat e ol curb) Roads. Rural (edge of pavement) Trails (well defined) Railroads Buildirus Drivewavs Alievs Culvens Fences (including residential property fences) Bridges Pipelines Dam Structures Large Signs Poles Walls Section Comers (if prr nded) Field Road> & Turnouts 2' Contour Intervals (normal) Spot eleva* ons Deprf .on Ticks Grid 1 icks or Grids Field Control Points M ■AUTOCAD DXTABASK FII.E nFr.TVRRVThis data base file deliverv’ is based on the following parameters:1 The data provided will operate on IBM Compatible hardware or equivalent. 2. The Disk Operating System will be MS DOS V 3 3 3. The media for data transfer will be either 5 1/4” 1.2 floppy disk or 3 1/2” 1.5 MB micro disk 4. The data will operate within Al iTOC AD RFLEASF 11 software. 5 Grid Ticks will be contained in the data file. 6. Siniple title blocks will be shown if requested (to include legend project and client name, map scale, contour interval and north arrow (please specify any special title block format needs) 7 Symbols will be represented as Blocks in the data file 8 Polylines are standard with .AUTOCAD R-11 9. The overlap or edge match of the data files on a mbultiple sheet delivery project will duplicate the hard copy sheets delivered (please specify exceptions prior to project start) Any non-standard data base file delivery other than the above standard delivery can be provided at the discretion and approval of Horizons, Inc. prior to project beginning at an additional agreed upon cost MAP USAGK. AmmAO^ & uabiuty Except where *he ground may be obscured, map accuracy will comply with National Map Accuracy Standards Briefly, these state that 90% of all well defined features shall be correct within 1/30 inch and 90% of elevations correct within 1/2 contour interval It areas are obscured, contours will be dashed to indicate they are .ippro> jmale Spot elevations, if any, within these obscured areas will also b: approximate. This map and/or database has been designed to meet National Map Accuracy Standards at its original scale of 1" = 100' and contour interval of 2V rtBCt MVMiKKiK V . ^. r —itrTzr-c.'5~. t’-:::■•;-i; t •• !-• • % r,' T • / ‘OROWO *.SmbbaBar •*^*' ai"lrO<r .-\S3v3 - / O ;^o ’ V?l- m''^ v7\^-/ 4‘j; •/- qf • n-v- r/:;V ■IS-^ -V-I >. ;#f^»%>itfi jf. •rV.S - ft' ' 'fy T^nagtr Lak$ \ t f y T '• ' A J V D^wrina <• p •••«f*« :'i;yA^;Yf//*’ ^^J', -H1''v. ,P04nt f r / y / <r-----'^^wt, f ^'/ - jj '• )ron6 PolrH \J ', d 1^ fe ■¥ \ CRYSTAL / < •yy y<^nr~ifiZli ;,'/V^/ ' • /* Feko /Z^:-/. /Aj ^}/<se^jr^{i± - 5'""’^CPO /JC/-ipS ^Utlrl)YZ$ l^ls^J)^ V //“i:-/ - ^ •! C*3/ «-(- A ■• •/1{/Ur'^^ •L^T Zoo A ^ ‘ V/1>tX ^34 -<u 6B / U #'» s-1-- - •f}t( 'e A i? -/■^<’r-‘i 6 - A<-.CA^JO A*^c 4 /A//^f4j S Y>,60^s- - •’ -_•- C-+- ' I ------^1 - • ••1^"- •'*■• _. 5".v|-'-''v.i.••0 - 7^- -t X.. •■■, - '-v^^ X- . \ !:1—^ btuhtt fUj ••"•••. V. *>"•-^l - " • V(n:i <! ; c.’',''r1.'o - r— :\x rr-. xui xAb.l • v..N.-”-^ -\^L: '-Xi;:/-:^mmATfH. )j.> »~ —'_- 'yivv ' TN $-'. ,.. 7:::^ ^ u-1 \ i; r. •.. 7 X m • \ i-^'s.( / /'V * «* -* • •I .' ~Us&SS^^ 1 fey'/Z/'X,,' '■'\;X^ Ta V \ »• • ' •Vv.: yCKYSTAL .X \ \ rii^ •-X- X' jnd. ,^'-. I. ' r •’■ V •.(• i--?(.Snrrail iT-ix7?^'7<P-7^ ).■—^isXiX’-v- -^/ r.'- ^ : >!' --———- *’'S^'VX^/ fiJ « *««ti Bair kn«io» '/: --i - ,- ^ • • , I •, - •••* « I ! :»*?A‘. >ry f ■<* i,,/«*»it* ' **“» SiS"' > / ^ «r * r -^ c-f- ,,',/^v; Oj?*-awi /» * .'\V V. ^”****\ .r%(>' 1>iW 'i',.. - X. jr^ •* : 7 f^ V'7"j • *‘i '. // . !.iC- V I u»<« ••■•'‘a TO; FROM: DATE; SUBJECT: (0 Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 17, 1993 Resolution Proclaiming Volunteers of Ameri % % The Volunteers of America, a Christian human service organization, is celebrating its 97th year of service. The organization has retTuested that cities join in the observance of this anniversary by proclaiming the week of March 7 - 14 as Volunteers of America Week. A resolution is attached for Council adoption. VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK MARCH 7-14, 1993 WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, a Christian human service organization, is celebrating its 97th year of service to the people of Minnesota and the nation; it is therefore certainly appropriate for us, the City of Orono, to join in the observance of this milestone with the commemoration of March 7-14, 1993 as Volunteers of America Week; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is making a valuable contribution by providing these services to adults and the elderly: 5 homes for mentally disabled, mentally ill, chemically dependent and/or elderly adults; congregate dining for seniors at 45 sites in Anoka and Hennepin Counties; home delivered meals for persons 60 years of age and over; semi-independent living services ai.d supported living services; 3 housing complexes for families, the handicapped, and the elderly; and 4 long-term health care facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America provided these servAices for children and youth; 6 programs serving autistic, autistic-like, and/or development-ally disabled children and youth; a children's emergency shelter; in-home services; 59 foster treatment homes and correction group homes; a residential treatment center for emotionally handicapped boys; a specialized behavioral program for boys with severe problems; short-term after care for youth with special needs; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America provides 2 correctional services: a pre-release and work-release correctional program ser'v'ing men; and a women's jail, workhouse and work-release correctioHctl program; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, through its dedicated staff and volunteers and the many people who help support their work through financial contributions make a significant impact on the li/es of people in the City of Orono, and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is commemorating its founding in 1896 and urges others to join them in bridging the gap between human needs and the resources of the public and private sector; o -,1 U therefore, be it resolved, that 1, Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor of the City of Orono, do hereby proclaim the week of March 7-l4, 1993, as volunteers of AMERICA WEEK IN THE CITY OF ORONO AND, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this proclamation be transmitted to the Volunteers of America as evidence of our esteem. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Orono to be affixed this 22nd day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ninety three. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk RHnTilIiI*K4KS] FniWir=ra»k»-.iiL*j •IfsPV* SAMPLE PROCLAMATION VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK March 7-14, 1993 WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, a Christian human service orsanUation, is celebrating its 97th year of service to the people of Minnesota and the nation: it is therefore certainly approp-'late for us, the City of CITY NAME, to join in the observance of this milestone with the commemoration of March 7-14, 1993 as Volunteers of .America Week; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is making a valuable contribution by providing these services to adults and the elderly: 5 homes for mentally disabled, mentally ill, chemically dependent and/or elderly adults; congregate dining for seniors at 45 sites in Anoka and Hennepin Counties; home delivered meals for persons 60 years of age and over; semi­ independent living services and supported living services; 3 housing complexes for families, the handicapped, and the elderly; and 4 long-term health care facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of .America provides these services for children and youth: 6 programs serving autistic, autistic-like, and/or development-ally disabled children and youth; a children’s emergency shelter; in-home services; 59 foster treatment homes and correction group homes; a residential treatment center for emotionally handicapped boys; a specialized behavioral program for boys with severe problems; short-term after care for youth with special needs; and, WTTFRFAS, the Volunteers of America provides 2 correctional services: a pre-release and work- release correctional program serving men; and a women’s Jail, workhouse and work-release correctional program; and, WHEREiVS, the Volunteers of America, through its dedicated staff and volunteers and the many people who help support their work through financial contributions make a significant impact on the lives of people in CITY NAME’, and. WllEREfVS, the Volun rs of America is commemorating its founding in 1896 and urges others to join them in bridging the gap between human needs and the resources of the public and private sector; NOW, IHERE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, MA YORS FIZL NAME, Mayor of the City of QH SAME, do herebv proclaim the week of March 7-14, 1993, as VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MEEK IN CITY S-'ME ^IND, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this proclamation be tiansmitted to ±e Volunteers of America as evidence of our esteem. IN WniS'ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set niy hand and caused the Great Seal of 'he City of CITY SAME to be afExed this____day of_______________in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ninety three. .M A Y O R ^•kWld0{ rimnunr/ii T*Wtrj^^ir0i ■ II •j »FaTM • I I » TniirTi ^ 0 VOLUTSiTEERS OF AMERICA ... was founded March 8,1896 In New York City. Less than four months later serv ices were begun in Minneapolis. VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA, a national Christian human service organization, has a 97 year history of serving people in need; regardless of their race, color or creed. It seeks to develop programs in areas where human needs are not being met by e.\isting services. VOLUNTEERlS OF AMER/CA staff is comprised of individuals who not only have administrative and/or professional social work expertise, but who also have a commitment to the Christian mission of the organization; the reaching and uplifting of all people. Last year, in aodition to 340 staff, more than 2100 persons volunteered their talents to help enrich program services in Minnesota. VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA, a 501(c)(3) organization, is eligible to receive tax deductible donations. V'OLUNTEERS OF AMERICA meets all regulatory standards such as a certified audit, annual report, and filings with the Charities Division of the Minnesota Attorney General ’s Office. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Of Minnesota In IVIinnesota Mark T. Fbten, Chair James E. Hogie Jr, Pres Mary E. Adams Ronald £. Britz Katie Erickson Walter W. Faster James W. Feil Gordon M. Haga Peter L. Hauser Barbara A. King Ross E. Kramer John S. MacArthur William W. McDonald W. Lyle Meyer John T. Richter Erling W. Rockney William E. Sandvig Cla}ton W. Strandlie Renee J Tait Robert Van tlkenburg Dr. Fiaizo A. Weber Mary E. Adams, Chair James E. Hogie Jr, Pres Jack L. Dignum Robert E. Nolte Jr Edward Settevig Edward C. Spetbmann VOLUNTEERS OF AAHTUCA MINNESOTA DISTRICT OFRCE administrative, accounting, and development offices .'*re located at 3905 Golden Valley Road, .Minneapolis, MN 55422-4490 (612) 546-3242 j J Il TO; FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council ^ Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 17, 1993 SUBJECT: Cigarette Vending Machine Ordinance % - XV Attachments:A. Memoranda From Past Council Actions Related to the Cigarette Vending Mach'ne Issue B. Memo from the Police Chief concerning Vending Machines The current cigarette vending machine ordinance includes a total ban on the sale of cigarettes through vending machines. The Council at its January 25th meeting requested staff to provide information regarding allowing vending machines in establishments which prohibit minors. The attached information includes an ordinance which allows cigarette vending machines only on premises which possess a current On-Sale intoxicating liquor license. This language was suggested by the City Attorney as being a more defendable way to allow vending machines in establishments where those under 18 years of age are prohibited (unless accompanied by at least one parent or guardian). An ordinance allowing cigrirette vending machines in On-Sale liquor establishments would allow two establishments in Orono to have vending machines - Jimmies Bar and the Wayzata Country Club. The attachments also include a February 20, 1990 memo from Dorothy Hallin which lists a number of alternative ways to limit vending machine sales. The Council may at this time choose to retain the current ordinance in which no action is required. The Council may also cnoose to amend the current ordinance. / / / 3 9 O MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1990 SEASONAL WEIGHT LIMITS RESOLUTION #2754* It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by CounciIraember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2754, establishing the 1990 Weight Limits for City streets from March 15 through May 15, 1990. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Ccunci Imember Goetterif seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding: Section 125, Highway 12 Well/Water Service Progress, 1972 Shadywood Road, Recycling Program Publicity, K-S Name Contest, and Financial Health Profile. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT; City A^ttorney Barrett had no report. LICENSESCounciImember Goetten expressed her concern about juveniles obtainino cigarettes. She suggested that Orono refrain *.rom licensing' organizations to sell cigarettes from vending machines and perhaps over-the-counter as well. City Administrator Bernhardson said that 5 of the licenses being presented this evening involve cigarette vending machines. The other 6 sell cigarettes over-the-counter. Bernhardson said cigareVt^es^f^om v^^endin^ma^^h^nes!" He provided the Acting Mayor Callahan with copies of ordinances from ^ Shoreview and White Bear Lake. Bernhardson suggested that the Counci' could approve both the over-the-counter and vending machine cigarette licenses, or allow the vending machine and over-the-counter licenses to exist for only 3 months to time to look at revising the ordinance. Another option would be to act to incorporate a prohibition of vending machines. Counci Imember Goetten said that she would like to start somewhere. Bernhardson noted that presently there was nothing to difier^tiate between a vendrng "'•^^ine cigarette license or over-the-counter cigarette license. Bernhardso.i said that tney could be divided into two separate categories. Counciimember Nettle, Sit?l« «id that the question is whether the Council should pcovid* notice of t.heir intention to do that. I ting op JANUARY 22, 1990Boaolueio'Vj®?;, estabfi 1 ember Goettf^n iiae. Motion, Ayes-4, •port. :ed^\ha^rorSnf ?ef r'aYn "i -ttes f„= “cigarette ^e°/d<"'’® 8-counter seYA”^ machines. “ Hr--f «- .1 to provide ‘vending* *^^—^3" — ™»%v.V4sur" linance would have -a t. that thla evening, •he would like to start ’'^1 —*'• *'*• nothing to rSil'i"'— ‘‘cense or an rnh.rd.on said that the? L— he In favor of her th:"r^- -chin.- dS that MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1990 LICENSES CONTINUEDActing Mayer Callahan indicated that it would not seem right to just deny the licenses this evening without £..\y notice to the applicants. Bernhardson requested that the Council make an ordinance amendment to say that vending machine licenses will be issued for a 3 month period. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to amend Ordinance #5.24 to state that cigarette licenses will.be valid for only a 90 day period. Further, that staff is directed to prepare an ordinance permitting the prohibition of licensing of cigarette vending machines. Staff is to bring that resolution before the Council prior to expiration of the 90 day period. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays- 0, Motion pa^'-cd. BILLS Councilmember Petersen questioned some of the vendors* to whom checks were issued. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the unidentified vendors resulted from a computer error. It was moved by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by Acting Mayor Callahan, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. ADJOURNMENT 8:20 P.M. , . It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Acting Mayor Callahan to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 6:20 p.m. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. 12 minutes of orono council meeting of FEBRUART 26, 1990 as the primary representative and Counci Imembe r “rve as^he alt<.rnata for the Highway 12 Cotcidor Study Technical Committee. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. CIGABETO ^NDING^^CTI^S^_.nhardson presented the Council with several options to consider regarding cigarette vending machines. Councilmember Goetten questioned whether the Council should Counc . hhis until the Legislature makes a decision, delay “"“operators Involved with cigarette vSndi^ machtnes have been notified that the City is reviewing the policy. Bernhardson replied that the City Clerk had sent a letter to all of them. Acting Mayor Callahan stated that he vouid find It difficult to legislating such an issue. councilmember Peterson said that she wouldn't vote to ban them. It was moved by Councilmember t"^“les to machines to places where everyone but JimmiesPeterson noted that it would eliminate everyon Lounge. There was no second. Bernhardson noted that t y"'^°^avoid^the prohibition was provided by the cigarette said that Bloomingtonof cigarette vending machines. Bernhardson saio and Minneapolis are proposing that option. After discussion of wi°s^h"*to^make *che^ motion suggested that Councilmember Nettles may he previously made. It was moved by ig alette ^machine sales to councilmember Goetten, to Motion, Ayes -3»places where minors are P^f^ibited. Motion, Councilmember Eeterson, Nay. Mo^io p REQUEST FOR SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING Callahan, seconded by It was moved by ^j-ig^ftem until the C.D.3.G. iSd“g"ei We'’t,r‘L?nVd*1n M'?rc^^"'MoUon, Ay«-4, N.ys-0, Motion passed. f m minutes of orono council meeting held march 12, 1990 STOBBS BAY ^EWER CONTINUED Callahan, ® rafce 11/ l->jr w ^ - r rr-;:ih#ak seconded by Counciln^srnber It was moved by . f the %operty owners wishing to be Nettles, to table ^he t° i the Ma?ch 26th Council Meeting. =n, %°es-r Na^s-3, Motion passed. CIGARETTE VENDING ^^j-^son briefly reviewed the statusCity Administrator B«nhardson of this issue. After that the ordinance be amended to Attorney, it is the cLy of Orono to have cigarette allow on-sale licensees ^h the = F jimmies Lounge and the Cout^«; auhTo%r°:^cig°a"r^^te vending machines. t- L. •«/^-ir'ated that he woulw* prefer Mayor Grabek .ndica , entirely from Oronocigarette vending machines banned entirety to have Clyaicuuc --------------^ ^ ceronded bv Councilmeinber It was trett^tending machines from Orono. Mayor ^t^ber'asttd'^Citt ’ Attorney Barrett^^if^^th^^^^^ ^are jny ^legalGrabek asked City Attorney Barret^ replied that many cities problems with such a „ baling cigarette vending Save passed ordinances those cities have been machines. Barrett no.e they could probably uphold the sued, but advised council ^av, due to her belief that ordinance. Motion, officiL to do the educating on tSe^^lron%t«'tt°e^::k!ig!‘^oticn passed. NAVARRE MASTER “ n^nhardscn presented information to City Administrator .o coranlete master planning council regarding the estimated cost to compie in the Navarre area.le I'tavoi.i.Bi expre^s:rii?i:^rt i';=?e^dVve?:^:entr^^“ t: ^ fnar rhere does not seem to be anyBernhardson replied tn^^^^^h^^^^_ there may parties interested in . * lona term plan,interest in the development of a long term p .pecmr'plan“f-^ thVt" afet! ^^fklr^hh ;^ovr.io'nVTh*.^'’c“t;^ou!d r.gulre that any development plan be upheld? City Attorney Barrett replied that the best way to provide - 19 - L I MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 26, 1990 STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED Mr. Olson said that it is obvious that there are propeities that are in need of sewer. He said that the City is asking the larger, newly developed properties to support the sma^.ler properties that actually need the project. The Council agreed that they we’ in need of more time to review all of the aspects of this pro;-ct. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table this matter until^ the April 9, 19..0 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. CIGARETTE VENDING MACHINE ORDINANCE 81, SECOND SERIES j ^ u ^ iIt was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to adopt Ordinance 81, Second Series, amending Section 5.24 so as to totally ban cigarette vending machines within the Citv of Orono, effective May 1, 1990. Motion, Ayes-3, Councilmember Peterson, Nay. JOINT CODNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to hold a joint Council/Planning Commission Meeting for Saturday, April 7, 1990 at 8:30 e.m. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays- 0, Motion passed. REQUEST TO HAVE AUTO AUCTION* it was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to establish April 28, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. at Martins 66 as the time and place for an auction of unclaimed vehicles subsequent to published notice in the official newspaper and notification being sent to registered owners. Motion, Ayes- 4, Nays-0, Motion passed. SECRET7tRY POSITION RESIGNATION-EMPLOYMENT Acting City Administrator Gerhardson item be removed from consideration. requested that this SALARY REVIEW - ASST. FINANCE DIRECTOR* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adjust Assistant Finance Director Linda Walters hourly wage rate from Level 5, Step II ($11,073) to Level 5, Step III ($11,688) effective April 2, 1990. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays- 0, Motion passed. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT PROBATIONARY POLICE OFFICER AND PERMISSION TO EMPLOY FULL TIME POLICE OFFICER Chief Kilbo requested permission to hire Mr. Jay Dembocski as a full time officer to replace Jeff Larson who has been terminated. - 19 - ordinance I f SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION S.24 ADOPTED APRIL 1, 1984, AND ENTITLED "TOBACCO." The City Council of Osono ocdains: Section 5.24, Tobacco is hereby amended by adding the following language. Subdivision 4. Tobacco PrcduCwS. A Prohibited sales from vending machines. No person 1 1 call nr dispense any cigarettes or tobacco product, cilacette paper or cigarette wrapper through the use of a vending machine. Sabdivison 5. Purchase or attempted purchase of tobacco products by minors prohibited. A It shall be unlawful for any person who has not ■ j e Q v^ars of age to purchase or at .empt —o purchase any tobacco ^P^roduct.^ v^i^oirted^lThi J"^%l?ion^ shl/l “be Iu'b‘lc%''to° thl of the cuveniie Statute section *60 111. ®Ya “on of this section shall fSSj«t*rhe"”inoVto\^ Ane =f sioO.OO for a first violation or $200.00 for any subsequent violation. This ordinance shall t-come effective the first day of May, 1990. Adopted by the Council at a tegular meeting held Match 26, 1990, by a voce of 3 _nays .TTSST '^ane^R. GrabeRT^yo^ U [MJdA • ♦ 3790.6 TO:Mayor and City Council PROM:Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate DATE: March 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Cigar<»tte Vpnding Machine Sales Attachment:A. Draft Language to Ordinance 5,24 B. Oropo Ordinance 5.24 ^ /nr. C. Memo to Vending Machine Licensees Dated 2/28/90 D. Star Tribune Article Dated 3/7/90 E. Cigarette Machine Memo Dated 2/20/90 ISSUE - consideration for adoption of ordinance language 'restricting vending machine sales to places where minors are prohibited. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's Febraury 26, 1990 meeting they March 12 agenda. guardian) could be vague and ^ o^l ic4ndraft language relates it to the existing class of licensee holders of on sale intoxicating liquor, which ^Ocono same age group. Of the current licensees in the City of Orono this would allow machines at Jimmies and the Wayzata Club. (It should be remembered that under State law ordinance regarding intoxicating liquor P'^'^^ons under 18 can b at even these establishments as busboys, dishwashers or musicians.) Llcns.s with on sal^ non-intoxicating malt £com allowing minors in th. sam- room wh.re non intoxicating malt liouor is served by local ordinance but not the Stat la . (Current cigarette vending license holders in this category ar Navarre Lanes and Lakeview Golf Course.) The second section of the ordinance amendment specifically limits the purchase by those under 18 in local ordinance. As not.d in the attachm-nt a proposed Stat- law allow It nit only in bars, but also liquor stores and °|||lse^“'s^^\Vst^lt:^^t“aV£‘=harno^^l:n^'=opy^^ for the session.) L, ALTERNATIVES Policy Alternatives1. limit to On-Sale licensees.2. Ailow at On-Sale Non-Intoxications licensees. 3. Allow where owners have restricted excess to 18 year olds. 4. Utilize alternatives in Attachment E. Action Alternatives 1. Adopt. 2. Amend and adopt. 3. Table. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - That the Council after 7eTat»^ to this, adopt the ordinance with any modifications. Th_ effective date would be 1 May which is when the current 1st quarter license expire. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by second^ 5 »v —, ion^5*^?4 the proposed Ordinance #_, Second Series amending Section 5...4 effective 1 May, 1990. Ayes _, Nays _. ORDINANCE I , SECOND SERIES r 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5.24 ADOPTED APRIL 1, 1984 AND ENTITLED "TOBACCO." Th<* City Council of Ocono ordains; Section 5.24, Tobacco is hereby amended by adding the following language: Subdivision 4. Tobacco Products: Prohibited Sales from vending machines. A. Tobacco products may be offered for sale in vending machines licensed under this chaper only on premises which possesses a current On-Sal<“ Intoxicating liquor license. in addition to any other requirements imposed by law, there shall be placed on each tobacco product vpnding machine a notice as follows: "If you are under age 18 and purchase or attempt to purchase any tobacco product from this machine, you w^ll be subject to a mandatory fine of $100." Subdivision 5. Purchase or attempted purchase of tobacco products by minors prohibited. A. It shall be unlawful for any person who has not attained the age of 18 years of age to purchase or attempt t'* purchase any tobacco product. A person under the age of 18 yeats of age who is alleged to have violated this section shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court under Minn. Stat. Section 260.111. In addition to the dispositions otherwise provided by law, a violation of this section shall subject the minor to a fine of $100 for a first violation or $200 for any subsequent violation . This ordinance shall become effective the first day of May, 1990. Adopted by the Council at a regular meeting held March 12, 1990, by a vote of ____ ayes, ____ nays. Jani**8 R. Grabek, Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk .. JT K. Each licensee shall report membership and to the Council its g^oss receipt profits from gambling devices or raffles, and the profits itemized as required by this Subdivision. L. Records required by this Subdivision shall be preserved for three (3) years and the licensee shall make available the records relating to operation of gambling devices and the conduct of raffles for public inspection a*- reasonable times and places. M. Except as otherwise herein ;:‘rovided, gambling devices shall be operated and raffles conducted by a licensee only upon premises which it owns or leases except hat tickets tor raffles conducted in accordance with this Section m^y 'o sold off the premises. N. Total prizes from the operation oC paddlewheel.s, tipboards and pull-tabs (or ticket jars) awarded in any single day in which they are operated shall not exceed $1,000.00. Total prizes resulting from any single spin of a paddlewheel, or any single seal of a tipboard, each tipboard limited to a single seal, or from a single pull-tab (or ticket jar) shall not exceed $150.00. Total prizes awarded in any calendar year by any licensee from the operation of paddlewheels, tipboards, and pull-tabs (or ticket jars) and the conduct of raffles shall not exceed $35,000.00. Merchandise prizes shall be valued ?t fair market retail value. O. An organization which directly or under contract to the State or a political subdivision delivers health or social services and which is exempt from taxation pu.rsuant to section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended through December 30, 1981, may award total prizes in a calendar year from the conduct of raffles, in excess of the limitation provided in Subparagraph N of this Subdivision, provided that the prizes consist of real or personal property donated to the organization by an Individual, corporation or other organization and, except as hereinafter provided, the organization complies with the other requirements and restrictions of this Section. An organization defined in this Subparagraph is not subject to the membership restrictions of Subparagraphs C and F of this Subdivision or Item 8 of Subdivision 1 of this Section, nor is it subject to the compensation limitations of Subparagraph E of this Subdivision. SEC. 5.24. TOBACCO. Subd. 1. Definition. As used in this Section, the term "tobacco" means and includes tobacco in any form, including but not limited to, cigarettes, cigars, bagged, canned or packaged product. Subd. 2. License Required. It is unlawful for any person, directly or Indirectly (or by any manner or means), to keep for retail sale, sell at retail, or otherwise dispose of any tobacco in any form unless a license therefor shall first be obtained from the City. ORONO CC 113 (4-1-84) § 5.24 Subd. 3. Restrictions. A. Separate licenses shall be issued for the sale of tobacco at each fixed place of business, and no license shall be issued for a movable place of business. B. It is unlawful for any person to sell or give away any tobacco in any form to any person under the age of eighteen (18) years. C. It is unlawful for any person to keep for sale, sell or dispose of any tobacco in any form containing opium, morphine, jimson weed, bella donna, strychnos, cocaine, marijuana, or any other deleterious or poisonous drug except nicotine. SEC. 5.25. SHOWS AND LARGE ASSEMBLIES. ) Subd. 1. License Required. It is unlawful for any person to present any public show, movie, caravan, circus, carnival, theatrical or other performance or exhibition without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. It is also unlawful for any person to promote or sponsor a large assembly, for any purpose and to which the public is invited, without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. For the purpose of this Section, "large assembly" means a gathering, or projected gathering, of more than three hundred (300) persons at one time and at a single location. Subd. 2. Reculations. Unless waived or modified by the Council upon good cause being shown, all applicants for an initial license where a large gathering is to be held shall show ability to provide, and during the term of the license (if issued) shall be conditioned upon maintaining, the following: A. If fully or partially out-of-doors, a fence shall completely enclose the location of sufficient height and strength to prevent people in excess of the maximum permissible number from gaining acess to the grounds, which f ^ce shall have a sufficient number of gates to allow safe passage co and from the gathering. B. Potable water, meeting all Federal and State requirements for sanitary quality, sufficient to provide drinking water for the maximum number of persons to be assembled, at tne rate of at least one gallon per person per day. C. Enclosed toilets, separate for men and women, meeting all State and local specifications, conveniently located throughout the grounds, s.iCficient to provide facilities for the maximum number of people to be assembled in accordance Minnesota State Board of Hea!th Regulations and Standards, which shall be kept clean, operable, and free of refuse. ORONO CC 114 (4-1-84) 22890. cr:: u a TOi Cigarette License Holders FROM: Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk DATE: February 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment - Vending Machine Cigarette Sales As you nay recall, at the Council’s January 22, 1990 meeting cigarette licenses were issued for 1 quarter (February, March, April) only. This action was taken to give the Council time to consider changing the existing ordinance as it relates to the licensing of cigarette vending machines in the City. The Council will consider an ordinance amendment at the March 12, 1990 Council meeting prohibiting the use of cigarette vending machines or similar dispensing devices. The only exception would be locations where minors are prohibited. Please feel free to attend this meeting or write your opinions on this matter for presentation to the City Council. 4 •: ♦ ^4 Cigarettes bars .'iiul tit^Lior stores. rnschincs would bov; :y bo locotcd -.vitb^r. :bc VIC* of cr, employee, end cisarcitcs ______1^ J ..mK. vk.ltVl !h>» Continued from page lA «■ 1^ would be dispensed only with tl^eTobacco 3/7/f3 _ . . device.Wins one in House committee ^ By Dennis J. .VfcGrath SufTWnier The tobacco and vending machine induiiriei scored a major victory Tuesday in their eiTtirt to reverse the ter.s on cl„. - machines in nine Minnesota cii‘-?.. An industr. .'cmoted bill that would prohibit local com.munities , from bannins the machines was ap« proved by the House Commerce ■ Commiitce. V ' But the bill, whose author is Rep. i Bob McEachern, OFL-Maple Lake. ^ would ^ulate the location and ac­ cessibility of the m.achtses sutewide in much the same way as ordinances approved by more than a doaen eth­ er communities. Including Minne­ apolis ard St. Paul. The bill would prohibit and overturn existuig total bans on cigarette vend­ ing machines and prohibit new bans. Under McEache.m’i bill, which new goes \o the House door, cigarette machines would be banned from public places, with the exception of wv'rkplaoes. bars and liquor stores. In I Cigarettes continued on page 11A Supporters cf the bill said it wculd achieve what the bans and other re­ strictions on cijarcitc machines arc intended to do — prohibit minors from buying cigarettes. The bill would accampits.h that and presc.'ve the jobs of 20C to iOO .Mir.nesotart? who ser\ice the machines, said McEaenen. "There’s no doubt about it; it's a jobs bill.” he said. McEaehem cited a constiluent of his in 'loniiccilo w ho«e job involves ser- V icing cija.'eite mach,.nes. •‘The gentleman suppons his famly of five children.” said .vicEachern. "Why sho’uld I take his job away from him when ! can prevent the sale to minors?” Opponents of the bill, including elected oiTiciais from the municipal­ ities that have banned the mac.hincs. said the Legislature should net stop communities from imposing more rcsinctive regulations than state law. i.icluding u^e passage of ordinances for an ou:.'ig.hi tan. “I'm asking you (the Commerce Committee) to not take away the auLhonty of local elected oiltctals in our 0" n communities.” said Jefi7 Bnggs. mayor of W'hite Bear Lake, the llfsi .municipality in .Minnesota to ban the mac. ..ics. Todd Paulson, a council member f'cn Brooklyn Center, which .oted to ban the .machines Iasi week, said the bill probably would protect a lot more than 200 to 300 jobs. .Refe.ming 10 the health htoards of cigamtes. he said the bill would preserve jobs "am.ong cardiologists, respiratory therapists and undenakers." Cr tics included the state health com- misaioncr. Siiicr Mary .Madonna kshion. «no said smoking kills jbooi 4.>00 Minncsoians each year. Permitting iocai governments to ba.'i Cigarette mi.h),-ICS s a ■’mininvjni step to getting to that gc.il ’ oi having 3 s.mcke-free society by the year aOOu, she said. Opponents also said a locking device •.vcul.1 not eli.mtnate cigarette sales to miners, even though an .’.mployee who helps a minor buy eijarettes could be found guilty of a eross .mis- de.T.eanor. They also noted that em­ ployees might be ’oo busy to monitor the machines closely and cheek the ages of people buying cigarettes. Among those who tcsiiHcd on this point was Jordan Cushing, a l6-ycar- old student .^'om South High School in .Minneapolis. Working wii.h the Association for Nortsmokefs-Mtn.nc- sou to test how easy 't is to buy cigarettes from machines, Cushi.ng said she has succeeded in 90 percent of .her itte.r.pts in doaer.s of resta-u- ranis, bars, liquor stores and gas sta­ tions across four counties. In all cases, she p’urposciy let e.mployccs know i.hc vkas buying the cis^rettes. and iometi.mcs even asked for and received help from the employees, she said. ■ You have the choice of whether to sell cigarettes to children or not," said Cushing, "because kids are going to get the cif^rcttcs if those machines are still there. Any tee.nager car. look older if iney want to. They can act older if they want to.” Joe Lotspeic.h, director of cngineeri.ng for Automatic Products, a St. Paul vending .machine company, disputed that: "Believe me. vending machines can be controlled.... They can be as cfTectivc as an over-'he<ountef sale * in stopping cigarette sales to minors. Rep. .Mary .Murphy. DFL-Herman- lowft. proposed an amerdmc.'.t :o ' remove the ’preemption ’ clause | :rcm the biH. so local ordi.nances ■ could be more stringent i.han state law. But t.hat amendment -vas defeat­ ed 13-0. Local government! would siill be able to ban the machines, but only by rtvoxing cigarette sale licenses and ou’lawing the sale of ngarciies enure- i !v. ' • ♦ Trt Senile Cam^nercc Commiue« , ^ill ukc up the bal TbuiiJiv. 1 . [•lA [•K9] r«v« L*iir;^r« •ltV« s TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Following any discussion as to desired direction, direct staff to prepare ordinance language to incorporate desired direction and table discussion of it until 3/26. Tabling to 3/26 is advised to determine what if anything the legislature may do in this regard. Staff will inform the licensees of when the matter is to be considered. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, direct staff to prepare ordinance language to incorporate desired direction and table discussion until the March 26, 1990 meeting. In addition staff is directed to notify licensees when Council will consider this matter. Ayes , Nays _. t LISTING OF CIGARETTE LICENSES 3 tot3l of 12 licsns6<3 ©st3blishin€*nts in th© City* Licenses expire January 31 of each year. The fee is $5.00 per quarter. Licenses issued for machine sales are; Licensee Type of Operation 1.Crystal Bay Services Gas station/ Marine dock 2.Jimmies Lounge On Sale liquor establishment 3.Lakeview Golf of Orono (Teb-Oct)Public golf course 4.Navarre Bowling Lanes Bowling lanes 5.Washington Scientific Manufacturing plant 6.Wayzata Country Club Private country club Licenses issued for over the counter are: 1. Keaveny's Navarre Drug 2. Navarre Amoco 3. Navarre Liquors, Inc. 4. Orono Municipal Golf Course (Feb-Oct) Drug store Gas station Off Sale liquor store Public golf course 5. O’C’.’l livans Gas station/ Convenience store 6. Ricks Super Valu Grocery store ( • t • Vt' ^ '■<'i »,. •» *■ ’^-^C — _ *-—’^ CITl Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, CKKlNEt On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka " I — TO:1990 Cigarette License Holders FROM:City of Orono DATE January 26, 1990 SUBJECT: 1990 License At the Council’s January 22, 1990, meeting ail cigarette licenses were approved for one quarter (90 days) only. This action was taken to give the Council time to review and possibly amend the current ordinance relating to the sale of cigarettes from vending machines in the City. A refund will be issued for the three quarters that were paid, but not approved. If you have any questions reqardlng this matter olease feel free to call. BLIIDINC i) ZONING - 473-*35'ADMIMSnt\T!0^ - flNANCF - 473-7351 IAX.4T34>510 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 * * • . . L -itr^ Action Alert Cigarette vending machine regulations under discussion The Legislature will bear a proposal to adopt state-wide regulations on ciga ­ rette vending machines. Senator James Metreo (DFL-Soutb SL Paul) will proba ­ bly be one of the bill’s authors. Under the bill, stat; statutes would su­ persede any rule or ordinance of a local unit of government relating to regula ­ tion of the location of vending machine sales of tobacco. The bill’s regulations are similar to the partial ban type of ordinances several communities have passed. The bill would allow vending machine sales of tobacco products: * In a factory’, business, office, or other place not open to the general public or minon (18 yean of age); or • In an on-sale or off-sale liquor store or bar if the machine is under the close observation and control of a responsible employee, not in an outer waiting area or other unmooitored area, and if the ma ­ chine is inaccessible after boun. ‘The bill would require that in non-factory or bar locations, the machine must work only by an employee activating an electronic switch or by using a token. The bill will be up for a bearing shortly. It contrasts with a bill by Sen. Marty (DFL—Roseville) which would require local licensure of cigarette vending machines. JJ February 16,1990m ' Minnesota community ordinances to restrict cigarette vending machines Total bans on cigarette vending machine salts^'Adopled White Bear Lake Cbatibassen Kenyon Northfield Bloomington St. Louis Park Sl Cloud Partial restrictions on cigarette vending machine sa\es~-Adopied Big Lake Blaine New Brighton Preston Redwood Falls Shoreview Minneapolis St. Paul Duluth Other cities with ordinances under consideration BrookJyti Center Milaca West St. Paul North Sl Paul Brooklyn Park Owatonoa Gulden Valley Austin Worthington What ’S in the Census for Me? No one gets paid for answering the census but it pa vs off for everyone The information your answers provide help* -our community leaders decide where to put day care centers, schools, hospitals, and many more services. And. the census is used to determine how many seals your state has in the U S. House of Representatives so your voice is heard w here it counu ihe most. Answer the Census. It Counts for More Than You ThmkI CENSUS -90 Printed on recycled paper nsge 7 Date; To: From; Subject: February 18, 1993 Ron Moorse Steve Sullivan Cigarette Ordinance In general, cigarette machines do make it easier for underaged children to buy cigarettes and make it difficult to prove that a business owner intentionally sold cigarettes to someone under 18 years of age. In a bar, there are fewer children so this is less of a problem. However, underaged children can be in a bar with an adult parent or guardian. And, without adequate supervision, they could use the cigarette machine. If we are to change the ordinance to allow cigarette vending machines in a bar (or in a country club), I feel we should regulate the placement of the machine and require that they be located in plain view of a bartender or other employee and not in a hallway or other place out of sight. L /'ATO:FROM: DATE; SUBJECT;Ron Moorse, City AdministratorJohn R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director February 17, 1993Cigarette Sales Orono Golf Course at the^Golf Course. Council felt that because smoking is dangerous to one s health that we should not endorse that type of activity bv selling cigarettes. ‘ i j Staff wanted to see what the loss of income would amount to if we stopped selling cigarettes. For 1992 the City realized $450 14 income from the sale of cigarettes. It is unknown at this time what the effect, if any, there would be on reduced play because of not selling cigarettes. TO; FROM* DATE; Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 18, 1993 COUNCIL M^G FEB 2 2 1993 CITYOFORONO SUBJECT; City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 12 Attachment: Application and Certificate of Steenberg-Watrud Vohnoutka Roofing LaForce Hardware Twin City Acoustics St. Paul Linoleum and Carpet Crystal Mfg. Leroy Sign Ackley-Dornbach Allied Mechanical National Automatic Sprinkler Gephart Electric Payment No. $10,776.60 10.350.00 4,099,50 14.679.00 31.482.00 6,067.95 2.538.00 20.520.00 31.416.00 1.485.00 12.897.00 We have received from project Construction Manager John Davies approved application for payment of work at the city hall and public works locations as follows: - Steenberg-Watrud Constr. - For site work at the city hall/police buildings, $10,776.60. - Vohnoutka Roofing - For roofing and sheet metal at city hall/police building, $10,350.00. - LaForce Hardware - For hardware, metal doors and frames at city hall/police, and public works buildings, $4,099.50. Twin City Acoustics - For acoustical ceilings at the city hall/police and public works buildings, $14,679.00. St Paul Linoleum and Carpet Co. - For carpeting at the exty hall/police and public works buildings, $31,482.00. Crystal Manufacturing - For louvers at the city hall/police and public works buildings, $6,067.95. - Leroy Signs - For exterior and interior signage at the city hall/police and public werks buildings, $2,538.00. - Ackley-Dornbach, Inc. - For detention equipment, hardware and tTtetal at the police building, $20,520.00. City Hall and Public Works Buildings f AppG.ication and Certiticate of Payment No. February 18, 1993 page 2 Allied Mechanical Systems - For plumbing, heating, venting and air conditioning of city hall/police and public works buildings, $31,416.00. National Automatic Sprinkler Co. - For fire sprinkler system at the city hall/police and public works buildings, $1,485.00. Gephart Electric Company, Inc. - For electric work at public works and city hall/police buildings, $12,897.00 The attachments are presented for your approval. There is a 10% retainage remaining for each of these subcontractors on the payment application except for Crystal Manufacturing and Leroy Signs which have no retainage and except for Allied Mechanical which has a 2.5% retainage (please see the attached spreadsheet titled application number: 12 and the letter from John Davies regarding the exceptions to the 10% retainage). All of the requested payments are within the budget update amounts presented to the Council at the January 11 meeting. Requested Action: Council approval of Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 12 as presented. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 12 in the amount of $146,311.05, as presented. Motion, Ayes _, nays _. PAGE; t 0F6 ATPLICAHON NUMBER: 12 OnONO CflY HALL AND PUDUC WOnKS OUlLDWGS OnONOMN PAGE: 4 OF 6 APPUCATKDN NUMBER: 12CONTRACTOR S PROJECT NO.: 4059 OnONOCOnONO.NITEMNO.105001U522106051065511190 1312C 1312' 1312 150( 16C ORon OnONO CtTY HAUL AND PUDUC WORKS BUILDNGS OnONO.MN PAGE: 6 OF« APPLICATION NUMBER: 12CONTRACTORTS PROJECT NO.: 4059IT04NO.DESatlFH ION OF WORK 8CHE0ULEDVALUE WORK CCMPLEtED TOTAL 1 RETAMAGEPHEVKXJSAPPLICATIONSTHISAPPLICATIONSTORE)MATERIAIS COMPLEIH) STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO FNBHKraus Andorson UmbroHa liability Ins.$1,500.00 $0.00 0%$1,500.00 $0.00Krau9*Andorson CM Foo $89,430.00 $89,430.00 $69,430.00100%$0.00 $0.00SUBTOTAL on TOTAL $3,254,039.54 $2,927,223.92 $130,920.95 $0.00 $3,058,144.87 94%$195,894.67 APPLIL/5TO (OWNER):FROM (CONTCONTRACT FCONTRCHANCE OCtiange Onprevious fTH'I'jesBiNel changiThe undersi] Information completed i paid by the issued and herein is nc CONTRACT ARCH In accordar data compr best of the indicaled,' Ihc Cuotrj AIA OQCUM IIIt AM4k*i PAGE; 6 OFfi APPLICATION NUMBER: 12CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.: 4050TOTALCCMPLETTa)TOREDTODATH 1%BALANCE TO FMSH RETANAGE$0.00 0%$1,500.00 10.00$89,430.00 100%$0.00 $0.00$3,058,144.07 94%$195,094.67 ,r APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT aia document G702 dnstruciions on reverse side)PACf ONf Of I'ACrSTO (OWNER): City of Orono1335 Brown Road So.Crystal Bay, MN 55323FROM (CONTRACTOR): Steenberg-Watrud Con.st.10255 Inver Grove Trail Inver Grove llts., MNCONTRACT FOR:PROIECT: Orono City llnll/Police and Public Works Bldgs.VIA (ARCHlTtCT):APPLICATION NO: 7PERIOD TO: 12-31-92ARCHITECT'S PROIECT NO: 112A.04CONTRACT DATE:DistribirHon tor□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENTCHANCE ORDER SUMMARYChange Orders approved in previous months by OwnerTOTALNumberJAil I'r:Date Approved1993 i . Cv ini^'liy totals ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Net change by Change Orders Application is made For Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attaciied.1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.........................................$ 342.500.00________2. Net change by Change Orders .....................................$ ( 1.896.75')_______3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ±2)........................S 340.603.25________4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STOKED TO DATE....................$ 340.603.25________(Column G on C70J)5. RETAtNAGE:a. _JL0x, of Completed Wc^rk (Column D + E on C703)_% of Stored Materialb. _ (Column F on C70J) Total Retainage (Line 5.i + Sb or Total in Column I of G703)i 34.060.33 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best ol the Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application lor Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Dccuments, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor (or Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owtrer, and that current payment shown herein is now due. y''l CONIRACIOI A; By: , :enborg-W^trm^-Constructlou, Inc. f). TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................$ 306.542.92 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)...............S 295.766.32 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..............................................$ 10.776.60 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE......................$ 34.060.33 _____(Line ft less Line 6), St.ileof: \At Date:12-31-92 Subscribed apd Notary Public: idjworn IdNi; My Commission expires: before melt C IBAR/?1 ‘WATRUD •/day b Fbuc — minnesojio ;^AKOTA COUNTY r 6cm:r0crn:r.h::,fL t L: p*rc3 f' *“• 1'-'. ^ ARCHITECT'S CERTtFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Docurru'nts, based on on site observations aful the data comprisinj; tlie above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, informatioft and bc'ief the Work has progressed as . indicated, the quality of the Work Is in accordance will) the Contract Oocu'^nenls, and the Contractor is entitled to payment ol the ANtOUNL CERTIEltD. AMOUNT CERlirtED...........................................................$_______________ (Attach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount applied for.) ARCHITLCF: Date: !l)is Cerlificale is no! negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are wiUioul prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contrutor under this Contract. AIA OOCUMINT C702 • AmiC\T!ON AND CTRIIf ICATC FOR PAVMINT • AUV fMII IDIIION • AIA* • c VHM till AMlkit INSniUU Ul Ak* MMH* mW VORK N.W.. WASMINGinf). D C.CTR? fHin A pplication and ceutii icate eou payment AIA DOCUMC.NT G702 (Inilmclions on revetse side) osct or<i of iw.is.*JO (OWNER):Ci ty of Orono .1333 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 EROM (CONERACIOR):Vohnout)ca Poofincj & Shoot Motal Company, Inc.CONIRACT EOR: "oofing & Sljoeb Mota]I’ROItCE:Orono City lla.1,1/Police and Public Works Buildings AmiCAIION NO: 5I’lRIOl) lO: 1/31/93VIA (ARC IIIItCI): ARCIIIIECI'SBoarinan Kroos Pf inter and Assoc. I'ROitCE NO: 1124.04 222 North Second .StreetMinneapolis, MN 55401 CONIRACT DAIE:DIsuruiilioii lo:□ OWNER□ ARCIIIIECT□ CON I RAC I OR□DCONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENTCHANGE OROER SUMMARYChanp,e Orders approved in previous months l>y Owner ADI )ll IONS DIDUCIIONS,TOfAL 10,752 15,020Approver! this Month ;NumhQf .? A()pfoved • t ••13 • . '* TOTAIS 10,752 15,820 ; Nci change by CliriBye Orders 5,068 Appliralion is in.ide for P.iyincnl, ns shown below, in ronneclion willi Ihc Coiitr.ul. Cuiilimialion Shed, AIA l)<Kiimenl G703, is nllntlieil.1. ORir.lNAl CONTRACT SUM............................................% 156,288___________2. Net change by Change Orders ........................................% - 5,068___________). CONTRACT SUM TO DAIE (I inc 1 ± 2)..........................% 151,220___________•I. lOIAL COMPIEUL) A SIORED TO DATE......................S 150,836(Culuiiui G on G7UT)5. REIAINAGE:a. -JLQ % ol Complelcd Work J 14,933 (Cuhimn D I E on C.70T) 150 I).___% of Stored Mnlcrial S____________ (Column r on G70I) Tola! Relaioage (l ine 5a I 5h or h)lal in Coliiinn I o( C'.7(H)........................................$15.083 " ... Iftv »l lliv; ^ MH IVVIUS 4,1 , itdormalion and belief (he Work coveted hy this Applicalion (or l’.iymenl has been toinpleled in accordance with Ihe Contracl Uociin enis, dial all anioiinis have been paid hy llie Conlracior lor Work (or wliith previous (‘eilific.iles lot I'aynienI weie issinnl and payrnenls ri'ceived (lom llie Owner, and that curieni paynieni shown herein is now due. CONIRACIOR: Vohnoutka Roofing S. Sheet Metal Co.,Inc lly; _ _ _2'- 1993 l>. lOIAL LARNED LESS REIAINAGE....................................$ 135,753 (I inc 4 lesr. I inc 5 folal) 7. lISS PREVIOUS CERTIIICAIIS FOR PAYMENT (Line fi from prior Cerli(icale)................$ 125,403 11 CUHRINI PAYMENI DUE..................................................$ 10 > 350 'J. BALANCE TO fINISII, PIUS REIAINAGE........................J 15,467 (Line 3 less Line (0 Stale of: Ji) t ^B ^ e ■; n Subscribed and swmn to before me this ^ tl.iy o Notary Public: My Commission expires: /? D d- t'v j ^ C*' / 7 Cuurily of: hi ^ ARCHITECT'S CEUTIEICATE FOR PAYMENI lo a< cordaore with Ihc Conirar I Documeols, liased on on-sitrr observations and Ihe rlala comprising Ihe alrovc applir alinn, Ihe Art biter I rerlilies lo the Owner that lo Ihe best ol the Attliilecl's knowli:dge, ioforrnalion and belie! the Woi k has ptogiesseil as ioiht.rled, die <|u.dily ol die Woik is in accoidam e willi die Cniiliar I Dor iimeiits, and die Cooli.Klor is cotided lo payniool of Ihe AMOUNI Cl RIM II I). AMOUNT ClRIiriri)............................................ (Atl.uh cxi)lnn.Uinit if amniml cctfUicd diffciS ARCIIMEC1: Boarman Kroos Pfis By:------------------------------------------------- Ibis Ceililiiale Is nol negoliahle. The AMOli]m k COUNTY 1 ......... .......W. ........... iMtsi Its • i; Iff « projmlite lo any fljjhls o( llin Owner or Contractor uncIvM this Conifai I. AIA UUCUAUNI C70I • AITIICAIM )H AMI) ( tRiirrr All lOK lAYMlNI • MAY l‘mi IDIIION • AIA' • I'lfll till AXMMI4AH IN^Itlini Of AIUIIIIU IS. I7|S NIW YOKH AVINIII. NW. WASI flN( ,10N. t) T. fOnnf,C70MD81 II •; rrspyilnltl Am! N «irlr|rr| In |f»n a Application and Certificate for Payment (substitute for AIA Document G702)Application Ho.: Application Date: Period To: La Force Job No.:06l/22t9l1/25/9314151TAC.i (*Nt oi mr.is •nisitioitiion li>:□ OVVNl R□ ARCIIIUCT DCONIRACIOR Uo lectiun wil!i Ihc ronlf.Hl. \ 156.288 V - 5.068 % 151.220 S J_5P_l8_36_ 15i.083 I 135>753 j 125,^03 I 157350^ t l5.~467" Y of mm [2ERTS ZOXA K ,..»cPIN COUNTY iif SSTgaTg.! H f* iH are withoiii f iIm% ron(t4< I Project Name: CITY HALL/PUBLIC W0R}%S FACTO: KRAUS ANDERSON BLDG DIV.525 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55404 FROM: LA FORCE HARDWARE Si MFG. CO.P.O. BOX 10068 GREEN BAY, WI 54307-0068TRADE PAYMENT BREAIUDOWN IS ATTACHED.1. Orieinal Contract Sum .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^ ^fi’oTs nn 3. Contract Sum to Date (line 1 + 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 42.440.00 4. Total Completed k Stored to Date (column G) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . => **ii.‘*4u.uu 5. Retainage: / o// nn a. lO.OOZ of completed work (column D + E) . . . . S nn b. lO.OOZ of Material Stored (column F) . . . . . . S -00 . . «n Total Retainage (line 5a + 5b; or total column I) . . . . . . . . . . § 6. Total Earned Less Retainage (line 4-5 totals) . . . . . . . . . . . . v ^ 7. Less Previous Certificates for Payment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^ j4.uyo.ou (line 6 from prior certificates) ^ 099.50 8. Current Payment Due ...................................................................................................... . i’oAAnn 9. Balance to Finish, Plus Retainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^ 4,z44.u (line 3 less line 6) The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knwledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment showr. herein is now due. CONTRACTOR: LA FORCE HARDWARE i MFG. CO. iMoX 1/22/93 ___________________^ « J________ Not.ry PubUc. U% 7?My Coran'ssion .xpir^i Based on oo-alte obsetv.tioos and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner t at to «e of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as he quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the entitled to payment of the AMOUl^T CERTIFIED. AM0L7i’T CERTIFIED JAN 2 5 1993 ARCHITECT:_ Date: ■'^Hs‘'6e;;;’a-ficate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the •'c6nVrircVot'*‘w^e herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without preludice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT aia documlnt C702 unsitucimns on fcvotsc sidoi iwaoNioi rwr«.Kraus Anderson Const. Co. 525 South 8th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55AOA Orono City Ilnll/Puhllc Works Al’l’tICAIION NO; 1I’lKIOD lO: 1-31-9)VIA (ARCimiCTl:IKOM iCONlKAt'lOK;:Twin City Acoustics, Inc.8731 Bass Lake RondCONIKPUi\l; IWWjje, Minnesota Acoustical Construction >ARCIIIUCT'S I’ROjlCT NO;Uibtrihutum to:□ OWNIKU AKcnmcr□ CONIKACIOKnuCONiKACT (MTf 5-11-92CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Applicalion is made lor Paymenl, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Cuntinuation Shed, AIA Document G7Ui, is allached.OtANC.l OKOtR SUN\MAKY 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM 6,0QQ.QQChan^;e Orilers a[)proved in pri*\ioos months t)v OwnerlOIALApproved this NUinth NuniherP.R. il22 P.R. nt i> iifitfiiiii V ^\ADDiriONSjam !i U W'J *3,353.0030.00 ”3 .Ib . 00 1)11 )UC I IONS 2. Net tlun|;e by Chaii(’C Orders...........................................S____;;37383^0-----' ■T. CONIRACT SUM lO OAIC (Line 1 t 2)......................% 9j 38StOO ^ 0PP^r»•!. TOIAL COMPLE1EU & SIORED lO DATE...................% 9; 303TOe-A^(('oliirnn G on G70I)REIAINAGE:a. __ol Completed Work S ~“938t09________(Column D 4- E on G70t)1).____% ol Stored Material S______________(Column F on G7U I) total Retaina|;e (Line Sa f Sb or Total in Column I ol G7(H)...........................................i -930-rOe- C<ro,ff-r> llu! ufulersij^»ned Contrailor cerlilies th«it to the bes, ol the Contrartor's knowledjje, inlurmation and beliel the VVr)fk covered by this A|>plication lor Payment has been (ompleted in acconlance with the Contrart Documents, that all amounts havx* bi^^'n paid bv ihe ConUat loi lor Work lor vvbidi previous Cr^rlihcalcs lor Payment were iHsued and payments receivr»d trom the Owner, and that luffcnl payment shown lieri** * IS mm due. h. lOIAl lAHNlD LESS RLIAINACI .......................................$ -AlMSiflg .1 less Line 'i total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CIRTiriCATES TOR PAYMENT dill*' (» Irom jirior Ceitilicate).................% n. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE......................................................S ^ 'I. HAIANCI TO riNISM, PIUS RtlAINACIi..........................S d im* T less Line (>) Cl pa aV' f. .r^>'rf'>^OK: Twl^fcl ty^Jeou:^ xs, Inc. By; Duvr*—Bfiuker -- V Stale ol; Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to b/loft w Notary Public: ./I--.Dale: ^J^tuiary My ('ommission expires^ ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In au ofdanre with the Contrai I Dor umenis, ba‘.ed on on site observ.ilions and the data I iMiiprismj* Ihe abovi* applic.iiion. the An hiti‘i t c erlilies to the < )wner that to the best III thr Au liilec I s knowledge, mtormation and beliel Ihe Work has projpessed as indiealod, iIm* (|u»ility ol tlu* Work is in a( torclance with the C cmIracI I >oi uments, ami I tie ( rmlra* tor is rr it it led to payment ol the AMOUN I Cl RIIIIII). AMOUNT CLIUHILD (AtUih ej^/)/.mahon it jmnttni cvililivd ditfers Itom the nmount applied tui.l Ak( Mine I: lly:.. Dale: Ibis Certiluale is not m*}»,olialee. Ihe AMOiiNI CIRTIlirD is payable only lo the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and a< ceplarue ol paymeiu . -•* vvithoul prejudue to any rights ol Ihe (>wner or C'onirador under this Conlic^i • AU UUi UMINI C.;iu • AIM IN A.M> i UllIK All M )K IVUMINI • MA> I'WI lOIIIUN • AIA’ • f i mi IMl ASM k UAN t.AsmOH Of AKlIiru Is I. V» NIW UlVk AVINOI. NW. W'AM IIN(,ION. DC C702 19a3 WAIimfiG: Unlic«n»rd p#Yo«ocopyinq vlolales U.8 corv**<|M taws khd If iub|f cl lo • APPLICATO5^FROM (CONTR 8731 BassCONtKACr FOCONTRytCHANCE OREChange Ordci previous monApproved thisNumberP.R.tfe Net change b’ paid by the Co issued and pay hcreir^ is now c CONI -f)ave-Brd ARCHITI In accordance v data c vimpristn^ best o( the Arch indicated, the c( the Contractoi At* (MKUMtNT C UH AMIHCAN » □:I ORtail.rr,tr9 rr.rw y^r.ip k» rtw .iifkiui 12 I9U APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ma document cm2 (Insltiicliuns on reverse side) PAr;r ONf or PAr.ivAnderson Construction Co 525 Soutlr 8th Street I’ROItCl: orono City llall/Publlc Works AITLICAIION NO: lMinneapolis, Minnesota 5540AFROM (CONTRACTOR): Twin City Acoustics, Tnc VIA (ARCIllItCI):8731 Bass Lake Road-New lloire, Mn. 55A2H Dislrilriilion lo:□ OWNf RPERIOD TO: January 31, lt^53M^CHITECT□ CONTRACTORAKCIIIIICT’S □PROIECT NO: □CONTRACT lOR: yv<~oustlcal Construet Ion ~/UrL^ac^r/^CONTRACT DATE:5-11-92CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Applicalion is made (or Payment, as shown helow, in ronneclion vvilh Ihr Contract Cunlinualion Sheet, AIA Document C703, is allached.CHANGE ORDER SUMMARYCliange Orders approved in previous monlirs by OwnerTOTAL ADDITIONS DIDUCIIONSApproved Ihis MonthNumberr.R.#6 Dale Approved6-19-92IDECfEtS^D -92JAtL;,.u4993 ___195.00,887.00 Ncl chant’e by Ch.in{»e Orders 1JJ82_,Q0. T. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.........................................$ 10.310.002. Net change by Change Orders .......................................S -3t06£tOQ» '~o —T. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (I ine T ± 2)..........................S n ^ a011-^3 /ga/Qer.-1. TOIAL COMPtEIED & STORED TO DATE......................S 13,39 grOO ^(Column 3 on C7();T). .ETAINAGE:a. _19 % o( Completed Work S —1 r389~r00-/(7J/ erv (Column D 4 E on G70.T)b --------% of Stored Material $__________________(Column F on C7l)T)Total Retainage (Line 5a + 5b orTotal in Column I of G703).....................................$ . i , 339. UlF ^^WmnpIcHWWrirftWffflWre with the ( or>irari Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work l••r which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the C)wner. and that current payment shov,.i liereii^ is now due. tn> h. TTTIAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE.................................$ 4-^^^T-nn (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 0 from prior Certificate)...............$______-Q; n. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..............................................S 1 J ^Qt> 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE......................$ 1,339 ftfl ^ ___(Line T less Line (>) CONI Inc . -Oave-BrinkeT D.tle: 1,—1993 My CrrmmissioAcapites: Slate of. FJi^jwjosota olx/;?^llpnnepin Subscribed aiu|^jrn to l/fj/re imVthis (Wof, Notary Public : 5^!!. y 3-13-94 • ^ ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT hr ucordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-sili* oliservalions arul the data comprising ilie above afrplicalion, the Architect cetlilies to tite Owner tliat lo the Ik*sI of the Architect's knowlerfge, information and heliet llie Work has progressed as indicated, the ipiality of the Work is in arcotdanr e with lire Coirlracl Dor unrenls, arrri the Contractor is eirtillcd to payment of llie AMOUNI ITKIIIIFD. AMOUNT CERTiEIED •. t...................................T.................$ (Attach explaitation i( amount certified differs from the amount appUed for.. AKClUTECf; By:Dale: Ibis Certificate is not iiegoliatric. The AMOUNT CCRFIFIFD is payable orriy to ihe ( ontrar tor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are wiihoul prepidire lo .iny rights of the Owner or Contractor under this r'>ttlfat1. AIA OOCUMtNT tiroi • At’PlICAIKK' AND tllUlHCAU fOR nSYMtNl • NtAV I'ilU IDJIUJN ♦ AIA* • c, l-MM Itll AMlRtCAN INStlTUU or ARCIMliCtS. t?iS NLW YORK AVlK'll, tsi W., WASIIINC.ION. O.C. WanillflQ; Uiilirenipa photr'‘”eirlnq vl''!»l»» U.S. copyilqW iawq And l« •uhjvcl lo leqiii r»n.*riiilon. C702 t9tl zIefAli iTZii:iTzi2iimf«Hi ■. ^rtYSTAL MANUFACTURING 2525 NEVADA AVE. N.. STE. 305 GOLDEN VALLEY. MN 55427 PH. 612-537.6533 FAX 612-545 7587 ( NUMBER PAGE ^ INVOICE I V __________ ________^ 1 1 1 DATE 1 30-OCT-92 1 SOLD TO SHIP TO 525 S. EIGHT ST. MPLS, MN 55404 PHONE M <612) 332-7281 FAX M ROERING JOHr4 ORDER DATE icUSTOMER Nol PURCHASE ORDER NO SHIP VU TERMS 21 -OCT-92 2005 JIM CEREAL TRUCK NET 30 DAYS 7 7 HEM NUMBER RECEIVED nnv 9 -99^ irsoa CDfistruoioo (^ompaoy description LOUVERS AS PER QUOTE FOR DEPT OF PUBLIC UORKS LOUVERS AS PER QUOTE FOR CITY HALL ORONO MUN. FAC. UNIT price 376.85 490.00 U/M EXTENDED PRICE Lolv.'Ca- IMENTS ThAnk you, Appreciate your Business SUB TOTAL vnsc CHARGES SALES tax freight TOTAL 2637.95 3430.00 • • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT am docukiint C7mlO (OWNER):City of Orono1335 Brown Road South I’KOjECf: City Hall & Public Works CJarage.Orono, MN (InstiiKlinm on rpvrtse side) TACI ONI Of PACili APmCATIONNO: ^I’ERIOIT TO: 1/18/93 VIA lARtimECT); I^roy Signs, Inc., G325 Welcome Ave. No., Mpls., MN 55429 CONTRACT FOR: SKterior & Interior Signage ARCIIIIECTS PROlfCT NO: Distriliulion lo:IJ OWNER□ ARCIIIUCT□ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACT DATE: 5/11/92 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Ai'()Iic.ilion is m.idc for I’dymonl, ns shown Ih ’Iow, in connection with Ihc Conlracl. Conlinualiun Shed, AIA DucumenI G703, is nll.M lu*d. Cc CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Chanf’c Orders approved in previous montlis by Owner lOIAI. ADDITIONS $120.00 -vVpp^oved (his'Month Number Dale Approved s!AN V'J i1m:r>. I S V.l 5iojals si20.no Net change by Ciaiige Orders $120.00 DIDUCTIONS 1. ORI 'INAL CONTRACT SUM......................................S 2,538.00 2. Nd change by Change Orders..................................$ __±2QlDft. J. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Iine 1 ± 2)......................$ 2 .fiSR.nn 25^e.«o 4. TOIAl COMPLtlED i STORED TO DATE...................$ 2.fiSR.n n (Column C on G70)) r>. RETAINAC.E: a.— % o( Completed Work t (Column D + E on (;7l)i) h.------% of Stored Material $ (Column r on G70.I) Total Retninagp (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I ol G701) The undersigned Contractor certifies that lo the best of ihe CotrIraclor's knowledge, iidoimation and belief Ihe Work covered Iry this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Conliatl Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Cerlilicale% (or Payment were issued anc( payments received join Ihe Owner, and that curieni payment shown hcreii i is "*u«v due. TOIAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE...........................S a .finft--nn dSTA.oo (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR ^ PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Ccrlificalc)................$_______-Q-___________ CO nirac L'OR: Lecoy Signs,Inc. «. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.................................................. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE ....................$ _ (Line 3 less Line 6) ^0^ Date:Jan. J.Q,.1993 Slate ol: Minnesota Subscribnd b(^)rf imfUiis Notary »’ublic:^-^j|^^ / My Commission ex^i^ v/lG County of: ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In .iccordance with die Conlrac : Documents, based on on sile ohsetvalions and Ihe data com|>nsing Ihe ahove applii alion, the Art hilerl ceililies lo Ihe C)wncr lhal lo the Ik 'SI of the Archilet I s knowledge, inloimalion and beliet the Work has progiessed as indicalt'd, Ihc c)uality of Ihe Work is in accordant c with die Conliacl Uotumenis, and the Contractor is entitled to parinenl of Ihe ,\MOUNT cTRIII 1(1). • • • • • lASdhtDU^ iMIlflWHMI EEtrwMpIn County flowm. gi»i ? 18 9 ? AMOUNT CfcRTIFlEO.................... (Attach explanation if amount cerfffted di//cfs from the amount applied (or) ARCHIIECT: By;Dale: this Ccrlificalc Is not negoli.ible. The AMOUNT CtRIlFIFD Is payable only lo the Contractor named herein. Issuance, paymenl and acceplanccof paymenlaic without prejudice In any ghis nf the Owner or Contractor under this Conliacl. AlA OOCUMINT C.TfJ • AITlICAnON ANU ClRttf ICAU fOR nSYMlNI ♦ MM rmi IDllK)N • AIA- • I'WI Till AMIRICAN INSIITUU Of AKClU'tCiS. I7JS NIW VOKIl AVir^UI. NW. WASIIINC,ll)N. II C Jniiiii. WAnNtNQ: UnOcenstci ptMlocofiirIng violale* US. copyiigM I«m and !• Mib|«cl lo l*«al pniMcution. C702-I9t3 I 4 APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ma document C702 on reverse side) tacc oki Of 2 fACfSTO (OWNER): Kraus-AnJerson Construction525 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 PROjECT: City Hall f. Public WorksGarage Orono, HN APPIICAIION NO: 2PERIOD TO: 2/1/93FROM (CONTRACTOR): Ackley-Dornbach, Inc.716 N. 109th Street Wauwatosa, W1 53226 CONTRACT FOR: Detention Er|uipment VIA (ARCHITECT):ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO;Distribution to:□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□CONTRACT DATE: August 31, 199 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. AC; CHANCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month * 1,452.00 Number Date Approved -•< , f 1 1 '' m 'D■ 1112192 J TOTALS 1,452.00 Net change by Change Orders 1,452.00 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.......................................$ 31 »000»00 2. Net change by Change Orders.....................................^ I,432.()0 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ±2).........................S 32,452.00 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE......................S 28,000.00 (Column G on G703) 5. RETAINAGE: a. _L2- % of Completed Work $ 2,800.00 (Column D + E on C703) b. --% of Stored Material $ The undersIgne^'Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by th's Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. (Column F on C703) Total Retainage (Line Sa + 5b or Total In Column I of C703)....................................S 2,800.00 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE.................................S 25,200.00 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)................S 4,680.00 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.............................................$ 20,520.00 9. BAUNCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAIN/ 3E......................S 7.252.00 (Line 3 less Line 6) CONTRACTOR: Ackley-Dornbach, Inc. ; 1-21-93 Stale of: Wlsconein By Subscribed and sworn »•> before me thi^,21st' Notary Public: My Commission expires: i&^perraanent County of; Milwaukee day of January ,19 93 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AMOUNT CERTIFIED In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above application, ll.e Arrhilect certifies to the Owner th.it to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is In accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. (Attach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount applied for.) ARCHITECT: By:Date: This Certificate Is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED Is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AU OOCUMENT C7tl • APPl ICATIOI'l AND CianriCAlE FOR PAYMENT • KSAV 198J EDITION‘AIA* • 9 1981 THE AMkICAH IKSmUU Of ARatlUCIS, 1/1$ KIW 10RK AVlKUf. N.W, VV‘<i«INCTO T. D.C.C702-1983 I<oc*TO (OWNER);City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MK 55323 FROM (CONTRAaOR): Allied Mechanlcol Syateno 3A0 Michigan St., Hutchlnpon, MR 55350 CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Work _____ PROJECT:Orono City Hall/Police and Public Works BuildingsVIA (ARCHlTEa):Boarman Kroos Pfiater and 222 ^Jorth Second Street . Minneapolis, MN 55401 (Insiiucllons on reverse side)MCI ONI Ol 3 mus .APPLICAIION NO: q ^ jmDistribution to: *'i I’2□ OWNER 1PERIOD TO; 11-31-93:’□ ARCHITECT 00•□ CONTRACTOR 140ARCHITECT'S □^§0MPROJECT NOt 1124.04 O H I CONTRACT DATE; c Application It nude for Payment, at ihown below. In connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA OocumenI C703, Is attached. 1 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY w ^ Gtange Orders approved In pruviuus months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS .DEDUCTIONS 9,758.71 Approved tnis Month , Number ; Date Approved 1 1 « f•• 1 TOTALS Net change by Change Orders (9^75fl.7*l) ------ The onderjlijnetl Conitactor cerlifics that to the best oi Ihe contraciori Rnowicoge, inronnatlnn and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed In accordance wlin the Contract Oocumenis, that all amounts have been paid by ihe Contractor lor Work for which previous Cerlificates lor Payment were htued and payments received from Ihe Ownc-', arid thal current payment shown herein is now due. / [TRACIOR: AlBled Moch«nlc«I Syateaa of HutchloBon, Inc. •» I ■ 1. ORICINAI CONTRACT SUM .......................................$ 390|000.0p 2. Ncl change by Change Orders....................................5. t9»7jB«7jJ 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATS (Une 1 ±21.......................>. 3BD,241.29 4. TOTAL COMPUTED & STORED TO DATE...................% ■ (Column C on G703) 5. RETAINACE; a. 2-5 % of Compfeted Wbrk S , 9|506.C0 (Column D + E on CI703) b. __ % of Stored Material S-----------»,yV (Column F on G703) Total Retainage (Line Sa •(■ 5b or Total in Column I of C703)....................................% w 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE................................S 37Vi71^*-?- (Line 4 less Line S Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIRCATES FOR PAYMENT (line 6 from prior Cerllficale)..............S 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.............................................$------- 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE,....................% _____(Une 3 lest Line 4) ** *__________________________ l-?R-9a State ol: nitoaeso^ Subsuibed ar\d ssvtMry^ Notary Public; ^ AW #".“;'Alll!N«E5i0TA ‘ u»m Ztxnn% 3-29^ 1^3 ______ liMiwairf r AMOUNT ...........................................................................»Aiviv/vnii ......................................................................................................................................... ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT (Much eMpUnMlhn U amount cemned differ, fmnuh* »mount BppOed tou In accordance with lha Contract Oocunwnts, based on onsite observations and Ihe .* ARailTECT; Boarman KrOOS Pfister and Associates rljracomprlslnciheahoveapplH;allon.theArchhcctccMlfiesloiheOwncrthanothe bolt of Ihe AfchuccCs knowledge, InformtUonind bclici ihcWork haiproErcsscu os By; , -----------------------— Dite; ^ . Indiutea. the quaJify af the Work Is In aclordance with the Coniracl Documcnls.and CeMlflcate Is not ncnolUble, The AMOUNT CERTIFIED Is payiole only Jo Cn — . . -I AAerAiifeLjr /"CDTiriirr ^ __________AAkPfnfAtefeMrlCllflWJ M A • e K) Drr M n d 3mo X o X M n J> r in < in m 3 <^ b- K)m (0 Nu tnaicaicae inc qu*my i> ni Ihe Contracto/ Is enUMcd to payment ol ibe AMOUNT CERTIfltD. ims ^.ClTlMCaiC IS n«l we.r»aisswe^ ^ Contractor named herein.' Issuance, payrttcnl and icceplanoew payment ere preludice to any rfghls of Ihe Owner of ConUactor under Ihii Conlracfsr^Ar kth DOCUMIWI cm • AWl. ATIOM AHI) Cf iKIftCAlC IO« mVAalNl • MAY t«U tOlTfON • amuu CAH imarufi or AicmncTS. trjs nsw yosk AviNie, n .w, wa;.ujncioh , o.c . rm WARMINO, pho^ocw^ytng vtotau* U.S, copytleM Im and la ti lifift proaaaiUae. 1612 94Jh Une N.E. • Blaine, Minnesota 55434 • (612) 784*8902 • FAX 784-5787 To: KRAUS ANDETtSON CDNSTRUCTION ATTN: JOHN CAVIES 525 SOtZTri ETOTIH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 DATE: 12-21-92 Invoice # 8629 Job # 11904/0285 Phone # 332-7281 R±i For The Period From 11-01-92 To 01-01-93 Inclusive PARTIAL Request No. 4 RErCRONO CLT£ HALL/PUBLIC WORKS - CRYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA ^ o * ^ ^ Cr-ssircotfcr. Ccmpi-.y, item no Description Contract Conpleted to Previously Amt This Amt % date oorrpleted Estimate #1 Material,Including Taxes 18400.00100%18400.00 18400.00 0.00 #2 Design Labor & Exp.6100.00100%6100.00 6100.00 0.00 #3 Fabrication Labor 3700.00ion%3700.00 3700.00 0.00 #4 Freight 220.00100%220.00 220.00 0.00 #5 Installation Labor & Exp.16470.00100%16470.00 14820.00 1650.00 #6 Permits & Bonds 1200.00100%1200.00 1200.00 0.00 #7 Subcontract & Purchases 500.00100%500.00 500.00 0.00 #8 Total All Change Orders 6580.00100%6580.00 6580.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Totals ;53170.00 53170.0051520.001650.00 CHANCE ORDERS #1 MEZZANINE EXPANSION # 2 MODIFY HEADER # 3 INSTITUTIONAL HEADS CHANCE ORDER TOTALS 5645.00 840.00 95.00 6580.00 Original Contract Amount Additions To Date Revised Contract Amount Contract Sumrary 46590.00 6580.00 53170.00 ACCOUNT STATUS TOTAL OOMPuETED TO DATE PREVIOUS BIILINCS PREVIOUS RETAIIAGE THIS APPLICATION EDR PAYMENT LESS RETAINAGE NET AMOUNT THIS PAYMENT 5152.00 165.00 53170.00 51520.00 1650.00 1435.00 Hi*********** A****^^±ik*******it^iHrit**t *************** : 53170.00TOTAL AMOUNT EARNED TO CATE TOTAL AMOUNT RETAINED TO CATE TOTAL REMAINING TO EE BILLED NrT 30 CAYS P£tCJ,TY 1.5% 10% 5317.00 0.00 PI_.EASE RAY FROM THIS INVOICE !»!! {APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT madocum£ntc?02 (lusltuclions on reverse side) pace one of pacesTO (OWNER): City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PROirCT: City Hall & Public Works Garage - Orono, MN AITLICAIION NO: 0PERIOD TO:01-31-93FROM (CONTRACTOR): Gephart Electric Co., Inc VIA (ARCHITECT): Boarman, Kroos, Pfister3600 LaBore Road ^ AssociatesSt. Paul, MN 55110 222 North Second Street CONTRACT FOR: Electrical Minneapolis, MN 55601 ARCHliECT'S PROJECT NO:Disiribulion lo:□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACT DATE: c ( CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made (or Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached. CH.XNCE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner lOFAL hiumber" JAN Date Approved ADDITIONS 0.00 }0(-7 . M,- « T •• ‘•y' •' V, I /• ; •(TOTALS DEDUCTIONS <9,267.00> 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.........................................S 279,400.00 2. Net change by Change Orders.....................................$ <^.9,767.00^ 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ±2).....................S _?7n^ 1 3T , nn 4. TOTAL COMPinED & STORED TO DATE..................$ _ 270^ ITT nn (Column G on C703) <v9 2fi7 -()()> Ncl change by Change Orders <.9.267 ■ nn > 5. RETAINAGE: a. XQ- % of Completed Work $ 27^013.30 (Column D + E on C703) b. --% of Stored Material S ■ (Column F on C703) Total Rptainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of G703)27,013.30 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to lire best of the Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by titis Application for Payment has been completed In accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the ontractor for Work (or which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and ; ayments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................$ 243, 119 70 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)...............$ ??n , 222.70 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..............................................$ 12, RQ? QQ 9. BAUNCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE......................$ 27 ft 1 3 in ______(Line 3 less Line 6) CONTRACTOR: Gephart Electric Co., Inc. By: _Dale:1-20-93 My Commission expires: ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with tire Contract Oucuinents, based on un-sile observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect tcriifics lo the Owner that lo the best o( the Architect's knowledge, inlormalion and belief the Work has progressed as itHlicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contrart Drrcumcnis, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of llie AMOUN1 CERTIIUIT. fAMOUNT CERTIFIED (Attach explanation if amount ARCHIIECT: Slate oi: Minnesota /County of: Ramsey Subscribed and sworn to before mMnis 20th dwof j Notary Public: y /_ J / J / I notary puc; U^^mount Mpp/i By:. [)M Ihis CcrtHkate Is not negotiable. Ihe AMOUNT CLRIIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance o( payment are without prejudice lo any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AU OOCUMlNf U7§2 * AiTlK AllON At4{) i IRIilK All K)K I'ASMINI • KXAi 1*40) IDUION • AIA* • Mj 190i tMI AMtJtICAN INS111UU Of ARCMMICTS. 1T)S NtW YORK AVINUf. N W., WASMINf.fON. O C. *nnnf.C7n*i9i3 TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 17, 1993 i SUBJECT: Public Works Vehicle Service Equipment AppIi^Jftd Certificate for Payment No. 3/Final ^^0/^ , %oh ATTACHMENT: Application and Certificate for Payment No. 3/Final - Zahl Equipment Company We have received from John Rail of Boarman and Associates approved final application for payment of vehicle service equipment from Zahl Equipment Company for installation and instruction of equipment use. Requested Action: Council approval of Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 3/Final as presented. PROPOSED MOTION Moved by seconded by to approve Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 3/Final for vehicle service equipment, in the total amount of $8,344.83 to Zahl Equipment Company. Motion, Ayes _, Nays _. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMFNT ma document C702 (Instructions Ofwevorse side) PACEONtOf PACESTO (OWNER): CITY OF ORONO r.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 PROIECT: ORONO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES BID PACKAGE #3 APPLICATION NO: 3 PERIOD TO: FROM (CONTRACTOR): ZAHL EQUIPMENT COMPANY ^lA (ARCHITECT): BOARMAN & ^^SOC. '11 1 1 Mr* M I? 222 NORTH 2ND ST •JlOl SPRING Sr. N.E. MPLS., MN 55A13 Mii.b., MN CONTRACT FOR: _____________ ARCHITECT'S PROIECT NO: BID PACKAGE 93 CONTRACT DATE: 6/15/92 Distribution '.o: 13 OWNER |3 ARCHITECT □ CONTRACTOR □□ CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT ruAKjr.F ORDFR SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous rnoMihs by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month Nund^cr Date Approved TOTALS Net change by Change Orders . Application is made (or Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation ShccI, AIA Document G703, is attached. 1. ORIG‘; ;AL CONTRACT SUM......................................... 5 31^712.00-------------- 2. Net change by Change Orders......................................S ■ ■ -------------- 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2).........................S -------------- 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................$ _11 , 71 2 ,.QQ---------------- (Column G on G703) 5. REIAINAGE: a.___% of Completed Work $---------------------------— (Column D + E on (3703) b____% of Stored Material $ ---------—--------------- (Column F on G7U3) Total Relainage (Line 5a f Sb or Total in Column I of G703) The undersigned Contractor cerliiies mat to me oesi oi me a information and beiief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for I’ayrnenl were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein Is now due. 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..................................S 3I.7L2.vQQ. (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES TOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Cerlificale)...............$ _2 3.367..>±'^. 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...............................................^ 8 .3i^M 9. DALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE.......................S ~ 0 7 ■ - (Line 3 less Line 6) _______ CONTRACTOR: Slate By:M.Oa,e: ‘/22/?3 Subscr Notary My Co M aG«unlyuf; f ^•*)' v-r AMOUNT CERHHED............................................................' • .vnvUOv|,19 /\mvyui’^i II ...................................................................................... t data comprising the above applualion, the Afchilecicerldies to the Owner thattonc Due- A ^ best of the Architect's knowledge, information and heliel the Work has progressed as Ry:-------------ZlJLtLKirC;:--------------------------— ^ ® ' . , • . . ,i inrjicated the quality of tlic Work is in accordance with the Contract Documoi'.ls, and T||,jj CcrtificatKjsX t negolialjle. Tlie AMOUNI CLKHTIEl) is pay.ilile only lo »e lt,e Conir'aclur is enlUled lo payment of the AMOUNI CERUHtD. Contractor named herein. Issuance, payrnent are wiihoul prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under iliis Contracl. AIA IMK UAtlNT f.7«J • API^'r MION AND nBliriTAU HI* rArM»Nl • ^ ^G702I983 CONTINUATION SHEET { ’’ *AIA DOCUMENT G703 (Insiruclions on reverse side) I'ace or m(;tsAIA Documcnl C702, AI’I’LICATION AND CtRliriCAir; I OR PAYMENT, containit»i- Cuntraclur’s signed Cerlilicnlion is allnclicd.In Inbutaliuns bciow, amnunls arc slated lo I'lC nearesl doliar.Use Coiumn I on Contracls wlictc variabic rctalna}>c for line items may apply.APPLICATION NUMBER API’LlCAriON DATE PERIOD TO ARCHITECT’S PROJECT NO ITEM NO. DESCRIPIION 01 WORK 1 LUBE EQUIP. INSTALL SC'IEDULED V alue $8,344.83 E WORK COMI’IEUL) FROM PREVIOUS AITLICAIION (D + E) $23,367.17 nils I’ERIOU $8,344.83 F MATERIALS PRESFNIIY STORED (NOT IN D OR E) C TOIAL COMI’lEIED AND STORED TO DATE (D + E + F) X lie+Cl $31,712.00 100 BALANCE TO FINISH (C-C) I RLIAINAOt -fmH ^aVHL EfJlIlP/VHENir 'Vl DISTRIBUTORS OF PETROLEUM HANDLING EQUIPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 3101 SPRING STREET N.E. • MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55413 PHONE (612) 331-B550 MN WATS (800) 462-5336 FAX (612) 331-8553 TO: CITY OF ORQNO P.□. BOX 66 CRYSTRL BftY MN 553c:3 PEI: -T H ' STATEMENT - STATEMENT DATE • '* IV k CIT84 10,693. 6710/17/92 003A271-IN W. 0. #10A587 01/05/93 PAYMENT REF: 26755 10/30/92 0034616-IN W. 0. #105049 01/05/93 PAYMENT REFs 2£755 11/25/92 0035114-IN W. 0. #105818 01/15/93 0106666-IN 12,673.50 7,760.00 564.63 10, 693. 67 12,673.50 . 00 . 00 7, 760.00 564.63 'n ■:• • • • •t f * i '4 1993 PAST DUE? PLEASE REMIT Bf344.83 7,760.0056h.83 . 00 . 00 jr. . 00 BALANCE DUE m 8,344.83 W ^ W < W • • ■ ' fA^IHL IE'OLIIP/HIENT €€. ^AGE; i INVOICE DISTRIBUTORS OF petroleum handling equipment and industrial supplies 3101 SPRING STREET N.E. • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 PHONE: (612) 331-8550 MN WATS (800) 462-5336 ttiC581& .’3" 11 4 - IN PEI 1 1 / :’5.'9 customer no . CIT64 S CITY OF ORONO SCITV OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 P.O. BOX oo D CRYSTAL BAY 55323 PCRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 t 0 T O CUSTOMER P.O;SHIP VIA r.LJ.o., <" 'TERMS / : NET 30 r -i-. a • * . r r! a I PRICE tACH : T)ISCOU^fr J ‘ ,7^^, 1.0 CHARGES FOR INSTALLING LUBE EQUIPMENT. AIFJ COMPRESSOR AND DRAIN OIL TANK. 1 .CD 1.0 1.0 1.0 D 1.0 1.0 1.0 I .0 1.0 0 HIGH PRESSURE FITTINGS vr. r> HIGH PRESSURE TUBING SCAFFOLDING CHARGE ' 02 LABOR - ZAHI. r cr w t w w' PIPE AND TUBING. HANGERS AND MISC :> PIPE AND PIPE FITTINGS 3t ^ r» .* rwr I iKi T r^hj «-rPIPE UN I ON 7., IrilfL. y- ^___ Jw. . /.'Cv 3 0 500.00 325.00 SUPPLIES 250.00 234.00 300.00 0) Ci) (!) (D net invoi FREtG SALES 1 >IV0ICE TOT 500.00 325.00 ■‘20.00 3.126.41 250.00 234.00 300.00 CE: HT: AX: (jj AL : 7.655.41 .00 104.59 7.760.00 Lh|*et to eoff»ct.on ci..m. «Of d««iuct.on» on rh-t bill mutt b« m.d* w.th.n t*n «»*v* ttw '•ctm o« fOWH. o. .«.»>...... ..LU — ------- ................... ‘—tlMh^ .ccatntt O’ tttn.ooMti.on eomoan^t. of oth.r c*o..t b*vo«d ouf con ro ■IP ‘ 3fAVIHI. iElJl ililPViENir i'4DISTRIBUTORS OF PETROLEUM HANDL'NG EQUIPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 3101 SPRING STREET N.E. • MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55413 PHONE (612) 331-8550 MN WATS (800) 462-5336 FAX (612) 331-8553 PAGE: 1 INVOlCfc.• • %PEI,I 0 10o668-1N - 1- r II L in - T ■ .. t . . ^ • . - - *01/1S/P3 jap—'';»• —C' I* —; ’4 * •-< K-'it-. *• . -;t. CITB4 CITY OF DRONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 s H T O CITY OF DRONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 553: NET 30 f -»*: V*, »■ 22SHSS S!Z*iIitk r - - At CHARGES FOR TE5i.‘ING TUBE EUUIPMENT AND INSTRUCTING PERSONNEL ON PROPER OPERATION. ! ABGR /03 584.83 TOM 1 9 1995 i nisediTiTti CTTfOf ONQNO NET INVOICE: FREIGHT: SALES TAX: INVOICE TOTAL: 584 .83 .00 .00 5P4.B3 *17iiV:< i ,'ii- u'c avv^CiUtc mnir ' k •/6 TO: FROM: DATE : Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director February 16, 1993 % /% SUBJECT: Public Hearing Date Community Development BlocTf^j^^^nt Program Year XIX Each year the City receives monies from HUD through the Community Development Block Grant. The program is administered through Hennepin County Development and Planning. In order to acquire the funds we must conduct a Public Hearing to receive citizen input. As a result of the most recent census the amount Orono receives is less this year than last year. Last year we received approximately $25,700. This year we will receive approximately $20,867. The decrease is due to a lower number of low to moderate income families according to the 1990 census. The Public Hearing notice should include a tentative list of eligible projects. Projects for consideration may be; 1. Housing rehabilitation 2. Public service organizations WECAN, Westonka Intervention and Interfaith Outreach Community Partners 3 . Park Planning 4. Stubbs Bay Sewer Connection Grant I have attached a list of 1992 projects and a list of other projects from previous years. I would recommend the Public Hearing be conducted at 7:30 p.m. on March 22, 1993 . t -'Cf ’ ^o: May^r Peterson and Orono City Council Prom: Ron Moorse, City Administr.'tor Date: March 20, 1992 ouncxx Subject; Community Development Block Grant - Funding Allocations Attachments: A. Memo from Larry Blackstad, Hennepin County's CDBG Coordinator concerning Orono's CDBG program funding history B. Letter from Interfax n Outreach and Community Partners requesting funding .or a project The Council continued the CDBG hearing from the March 10th meeting to enable staff to research the issue of the 15% cap on public service funding and to contact the lOCP regarding a funding request. The 15% cap on funding for public services is a requirement of the CDBG program. This cap is applied to the total of $2.7 million in CDBG funds received by the County. Because the amount allocated by Orono toward public services is a very small percentage of the total cap, Orono does have some flexibility in exceeding the 15% cap. However, both the City and the public service agencies should be careful about creating an ongoing rsliance on a funding source that^ although it has been stable for quite a few years, is not guaranteed into the future. This is why many of the projects funded by CDBG are one time projects. The lOCP has requested a grf.iit of $2,000 to match a grant from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to hire a project manager for a low income home buyership program. Several possible allocations of the $25,7C0 CDBG funding amount are as follows: Agency/Project ’rtlCAN Westonka Intervention lOCP Housing Rehabilitation Park Planning yA B C $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,^00 1,000 1,000 1,900 1,000 2,000 1,900 20,000 20,000 20,000 2,700 1,700 — $25,700 $25,700 $25,700 The Housing Rehabilitation Grant cap is $10,000 per home. Most requests are very close to the cap. Larry Blackstad has recommended that allocations for Housing Rehabilitation be made in increments of $10,000, otherwise odd amounts will not be sufficient to fund a project and will be held until the ne.t funding allocation is made. If the Council deteLinines that the Housing Rehabilitation amount should be $10,000 vs. $20,000, there wouir. be an additional $10,000 available to allocate to other projects. Projects approved in the past have included neighborhood park improvements and community planning. Isv K HENNEPIN DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 16, 1992 Ron Moorse • City of Orono / Larry Blackstad, Senior Planner Office of Planning and Developnrent / Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program The city of Orono has been an active participant in the Urban Hennepin County program since 1976, the second funding cycle the program. Since 1976 the city of Orono has been allocated $616,398 with another $25,736 programmed for the city from the FY 92 grant. The major program activities undertaken with the available funds have included: Housing Rehabilitation $330,892 47 households assisted Sewer and Water 185,161 Assessment grants withiit the Crystal Bay area. Assisted Housing 30,000 Assisted in acquiring the site for the elderly housing development in Mound. Neighborhood Park 10,520 Bederwood. Hackberry, and Improvements Antlone Parks. Community Planning 43,919 Comprehensive community planning, sewer plan, community trail plan. Public Services 8,100 Funds provided to lOCP, Westonka Community Action Network, and Westonka Intervention. In addition the city has funded smaller activities for the removal of diseased trees and removal of architectural barriers at polling sites. Should additional information be needed or there be any questions, please contact mu at 3A8-5859. LB:dc • March 18, 1992 John Gerhardson Department of Public Works City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS “People Uniting to Help People" Dear Johns Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners is negotiating with Methodist Hospital toward the goal of preserving and relocating three of the Arleigh Street homes being displaced by the expansion of Methodist's V/ayzata facility. The proposed re-use of these homes is for horaebuyership for low- income families of our community. V/e have secured a grant from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to hire a project developer/raanager for this project contingent upon our ability to find matching funds. The findings of the preliminary feasibility study for this project are very promising. A matching grant of 52,O0O from the City of Orono would provide a very timely boost toward the goal of getting a project developer/manager on board. We would very much appreciate your kind consideration of this request. Thanks so much for your past encouragements. Sincerely, CL LaDonna Hoy, Executive Director INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS LH / jc 110 Grand Acc rue South. Wa>fau. .M:nnfsotj 55391 1872 473 2436 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING L993 (YEAR XIX) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Notice Is hereby givin that the city of Hennepin pHblirhi"?lnf on Conmunlty Development Act of 1974, as aa^n^ The public hearing Is on the t^DeveS;. city and urban Hennepin County, the f proposed use of the ment Block Grant Program Statement of Objecti , Grant Program Year XIX Ur ban Hennepin County Community Development B.-ock Grant Progr planning allocation of $ -- - - ^ In addition, during the July 1. 1993 to June 30 estimated that no additional program Income from locally tundeo ties will be available to the city. The Statement of Objectives consists of (1) administration, to maximize benefl ^ J Lvelopment of program funds; C2) HOUSING, to ^habilitate and «slst I housing which Is affordable to low- and moderate neighborhoods fhrg=errp=i£^^^^^^^^^ ;hi^r::::«f t: "^rmo^d^ate-inc^ « Employment to the benefit of low- and ”°herate_lncome^personsservices SERVICES, to expand and ‘•"P”'" 'ha quen y d q gp arcHITECTOR available to low- and ’ ,1 barriers which restrict the accessibility of elderly or disabled persons. Is proposing to undertake the f^lloiing°Ltivities witiTVear XIX Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds starting on or about July 1, 1993. Budeet Activity ^ ^5_ _ _ ___ _ - - - - - - - - --- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -$_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ /^«<'r«a^;es in the community planning allocation or the Subsequent increases , . ^ -La areater of $10 000 or 50 percent of the -r?:V::i:trntral'^EaSr:nE ;^r!i^;t „ Urban^Henn.pm county policy will be subject to the amendment process. For additional Information on the proposed actlvttUs.^l.vel of funding, progr«._obJectlve.^and^perl^^ County Office of Planning and Development at 348-6^18. The public hearing is being held pursuant to MS 471.59. 2/3.Z93 PUBLHRJ^G NOT Owner; tB A n ^ KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, 1979 to December .31, 19 I \ar\d.h'.u Ter n Prooerty Address: /* n •mZ MU^ Qa.^ Sr (Include city aha zip) Mailing Address (if different.^: Phone: (home) 6'zzg (work )5^5- RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: (over 3 months of age) Principal Breed:CA) t-;tb Purpose for more than 2 dogs:pdhs Dogs normally kept: inside kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) i 71 7=:nAAnA OJ CEH ::-£CK VI w A k/ » Vcc: A, Name of Business: TTA Business Activities:_________________________________________rTrr*, (example: bearding, breeding, vecerrnary care, rerail, -cc.J R£CEIPT-TH/^K YUJ ;i^030 COOi RO! 110-oir^ Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:insiae outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Oron •» !I«^le"a;pfo7al**Yn"/aVrnVothtrrer^ofab conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applicant Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Date ^ Recommends Approval y Denial r / ^6. % sH? % •-'-N 02/14/93 PR CB PRREGOR 163 A' f * * 'J » V •r i;3 -i* >! t. » > } i « "f ^ # « ^ 4 EMP » NAME DPT 471688060 474563339 476921819 471840871 475443862 472503991 469526026 475989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 477463877 471569863 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 480843542 47770 .323 334506281 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 470566529 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629483 500403192 477881539 ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS. SCOTT W BOSMA. JAMIE L BRINK.iAUS. JOHN F CHESWICK, GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI^ JAY C ENGLISH Itl. IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICH. DAN T FRITZLER. JOHN M GAFFRON. MICHAEL P GERHARDSON. JOHN R GOMAN. DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN. STEVEN C HANSINQ. CAROL J HASEMAN. CAROLE JOHNSON. BRADLEY P KARNITZ. RICKY D KENNEN. JANICE f KNUTSON, CHARLO .E A KUEHN. THOMAS M MABUSTH. JEANNE A MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOORSE. RON/.LD J MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NELSON, DAVID D CBERAIGNER. SCOTT Q OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A OUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMC2YK. MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VEE . LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA G WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 31 31 31 12 42 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 35 42 12 42 31 12 31 31 31 15 15 33 31 12 31 35 42 92 33 42 92 92 31 42 93 31 31 31 31 33 12 15 33 YTD GROSS 7016.67 4176.83 940.89 2389.72 6407.91 6723.84 6492.4C 5392.8C 6326.49 6283.04 6933.19 6587.86 5858.25 8173.12 773.81 6060.07 5046.52 5127.63 2415.84 3664.54 6344.10 701.39 950.94 4034.15 8618 21 7336.39 4820.53 9591.63 6372.72 611.17 5182.54 5227.72 5858.25 4583 74 5970.36 5138.73 1539.12 5095.82 5046.52 8187.18 5950.58 5877.12 6239.16 5048.52 3850.02 3869.78 4444.76 CURRENT GROSS 40 48 96 44 69 28 55 55 76 96 1526.40 1157.32 217.85 606.36 1611.68 1680.96 1772.32 1284.00 1514.81 1526 1579 1646 1473 1937.42 185.23 1315 . 1269 1231 711 . 921. 1659 382.57 259.12 10J4.65 2167.61 1845.21 1141.12 2311.84 1526 40 211.63 1164 20 1225 1473 1154 1379 1489.51 510.10 1337.18 1269.28 2059.20 1469.28 1469 1526 1269 963 ?97 1117 45 44 53 14 28 40 28 93 17 93 58.965.67 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. FEB 17. 1993. S:00 PMCHECK NO CHFCK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 27221 <*> CHfCK DATE 1993/02/22 $51.68 $51.68* VENDOR ALL STAR ELECTRIC DESCRIPTION REPLACE FLOURESCENT BULBs'ol29-434^9334-2 ACCOUNT pnNUMBER INVOICE NO NUMBER P»9« 1 27222 <•> 1983/02/22 1993/02/22 T15.000.00 $5,062.50 $20,062.50* AMERICAN NA.L BANK AMERICAN NATL BANK BOND PRINC DUE 3-1 bond INT due 3-1 0907-4610 000366 0907-4620 000366 27223 <• > 1993/02/22 $975.19 $975.19*BARTON SAN0/QR4VEL ROAD SAND 0249-4233 WIL5621 27224 <• > 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $175.73 $146.97 $53.25 $375.95* BLACKOWIAK & SONS BLACKOWIAK A SONS BLACKOWIAK & SONS TRASH HAUL JAN TRASH HAUL JAN TRASH HAUL JAN 0290-4343 96785 0099-4343 096755 0129-4343 96797 27225 <•> 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $141.92 $382 29 $524.21* BOB RYAN FORD BOB RYAN FORD R/R FRONT BRAKES 92 FORD R/R REAR BRAKES 8165 0129-4341 39871M 0129-4341 40066 27226 <•> 1993/02/22 $39.41 $39.41*BUDGET PRINTING COLOR COPIES 0174-4210 34299-34489 27227 <• > 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $489.19 $314.75 $803.94* BURTON EOUIFMENT INC BURTON EQUIPMENT INC 5125^9^ CHELVINO ADMIN BL WORK BENCH PW BLDG . 0482-4540 34965M 0484-4560 34990 27228 <•> 1993/02/22 $28.57 $28.67*CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP CO STAMPS/INK/PADS 0039-4210 6507 27229 <•> 1993/0*’/22 $828.89 $928.89*CARGILL SALT DIV WATER SOFTNER SALT 0549-4234 816229 27230 <•> 1993/0. 22 1993/02/22 $21.13 $70.33 $91.46* CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE ELEC FLASHER HARRINGTON . S . JAN 0249-4325 000370 0569-4344 000370 27231 <•> 1993/02/22 $361.00 $361.00*COFFIN GRONBERG LS 128 SURVEY 0569-4305 1284 27232 <•> 1993/02/22 19S3/02/22 1993/02/22 $105.85 $218.33 $14.00 $338 18* COPY D"P PR INC COPY DUP PR INC COPY DUP PR INC TRANSPARENCIr =? COPY MACHINE TONER FREIGHT 9001-1261 1669302 01?y-421C 01673310 900.-1261 1674362 27233 < • > 1993/02/22 $12.00 $12.00*CYS UNIFORMS ALTERATIONS PATCHES 0129-4221 57096M 2T234 <• > 1993/02/22 $15.00 $15.00*DAVID GOMAN alterations/.oatches 0185-4221 000369 27235 <• > 1993/02/22 $10.00 $10.00*DIXIE PETRO-CHEM CYLINDER DEPC.TT 0548-4234 D00956216 2723S 1993/02/22 $5,265.00 E-Z RECYCLING JANUARY PICK UP 0295-4392 000564 1 MANUAL OH OH OH OHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH ocouncil CHECK BEGISIEK WEO. FEB 17, 1993. 9:(!0 o pig* 2XHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ACCOUNT PONUKdER MANOAI< ■ > 27237 <*> 1993/02/22 $250.00 $250.00*GAB BUSINESS SERVICE DEDUCTIBLE CUFF SUIT 0424-4393 56527-1734 OH 27238 <• > 1993/02/22 $85.59 $85.59*GARDNER HARDWARE CO HOSE REEL 0099-4231 188223 OH 27239 <• > 1993/02/22 $231.00 $231.00*GATEWAY SAFETY PROD,INC SAFETY FLARE 0129-4232 2332 OH 27240 <•> .993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $10.80 $59.40 $39.60 $109.80* QLENWOOD INGLEWOOD GLENWOOO INGLEWOOD GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER CUPS CUPS 0099-4324 0U0368 0099-4324 000368 0129-4320 000368 OH OH OH 27241 <•> 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $16.00 $24.00 $40.00* GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER JTATE ONECALL JAN FEE JAN FEE 0549-4306 3010513 0569-4306 3010513 OH OH 27242 <•> ir93/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $297.00 $297.00 $297.00 $891.00* GOVERNMT TRAING SERV GOVERNMT TRAING SERV GOVERNMT TRAING SERV CLASS-B ANDERSON REGISTER CLASS-B JOHNSON REGISTER CLASS'I ENGLISH 1 U129-4356 1569 0129-4356 1563 0129-4356 1569 OH OH OH 27243 <• > 1993/02/22 $15 32 $15.32*INNOVATIVE MICROGRAP CUSTOMER COPIES 9001-3500 1171IM OH 27244 <•> 1993/C2/22 $ir4.48 $104.48*JIM HAT''H SALES CO ROLL FENCING 0249-4233 2209 OH 27245 <• > 1993/02/22 $3.14 $3.14*KOEHNENS STANDARD POWER STEERING FLUID 0129-4341 9035EM OH 27246 <*> 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $83,389.00 $31,079 00 $2,810 00 $5,840.00 $86.49 $123,004.49* LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK 1993 PREMIUM 1993 PREMIUM 1993 PREMIUM MARCH ASSESSING FEE SUPPLIES 9001-1280 50287 9001-1280 50335 9001-1280 50352M 0059-4307 000373 0059-4210 000373 OH OH OH OH OH : 27247 < • > K* .iJ/02/22 $565.00 $565.00*LMCIT-BERKLEY RISK 1992 ENDORSEMENTS 9001 1280 50268 OH 27248 <■ > 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $23 92 $31.39 $30.30 $85.61* THE LAKER THE LAixER THE LAKER ■-GAL PUBLI-APPLIC 2/1 LEGAL PUBL-APPLIC 2/1 LEGAL PUBL-AOV FOR BIDS 0174-4322 1149-1162-11 0174-4322 1149-116 -11 0249-4322 1149-1162-11 OH OH OM 27252 1993 '>2/2? 1993,d2/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $1,091.00 $107.00 $209.00 $105.00 $115.00 APPLE VALLEY AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY apple valley AGENCY apple valley AGENCY APPLE VALLEY AGENCY PUBLIC EMPL BL.ANKET BOND DEPOSITORS FORGERY BOND boilers-old bldgs BOILERS-GOLF COURSE BOILERS-NEW BLDGS 9001-1280 1671/1041 1)001-1280 i:71/104l 0099-4372 1687-1688 0590-4372 1687-1688 0099-4372 1F87-1688 OHI OH OH OH OH o O • o o oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 17. 1993, 9:00 PM pagt 3CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT< • >$1.827 00»27253 <• >1993/02/22 $707.60$707.60*27254<•>1993/02/22 $680.00$680.00*27255<•>1993/02/22 $72.00$72.00*27258<•>1993/02/22 $69.42 $69 42*27257<•>1993/02/221993/02/221993/02/221993/02/22 $79.54$147.73$113.94$85.97$427.18*27258<•>1693/02/22 $26.68$26.68*27259<•>1993/02/22 $11.76$11.76*27260 <•) 1993/02/22 $30.00$30.00* 27261 <•> 1993/02/22 $3,434.00 $3,434.00* 27262 <•> 1993/02/22 $2,196.00 $2,196.00* 27263 <•> 1993/02/22 $40.35 $40.35* 27264 <• > 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/02/22 1993/C2/22 $159.78 $221.91 $44.39 $93.88 $71.40 $45.99 $637.35* 27265 <• > 1093/02/22 $742.50 $742.50* 2726f i9«3/Q2/22 $21,629.00 $21,629.00* 2726/ <• > ifJ»J/02/22 $40.00 $40.00* VENDORCITY OF NEW HOPE CLEARY CONSTRUCTION INC DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES EXPRESS MESSENGERGENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO -3rr,!JINE PARTS COHALLIN/OOROTHY HASEMAN, CAROLE LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MALLOY KARNOWSKI CO MAMA-LMC LABOR REL SERVIC MARTIN BUSH IRON & METAL ACCOUNT MARTINS MARTINS MARTINS MARTINS MARTINS MARTINS NAVARRE 66 NAVARRE 66 NAVARRE 66 NAVARRE 66 NAVARRE 66 NAVARRE 66 METRO WASTE CONTROL COW4I METRO WASTE MGCSA DESCRIPTION NUMBER INVO.TCE NO NUMBER MANUALSEMINAR OCT 19-20,1992 0129-4356 AR100278 OHINSTALL/REMOVE XMAS DECOR 0299-4900 000383 OHANNUAL WATER PERMIT 0549-4383 000393 OHDELIVERY RE; APPLIC 1764/0840-4303 08-88471 OHEQUIP PARTS 0549-4232 000390 OHEQUIP PARTS 0569-4232 000393 OHEQUIP PARTS 0249-4232 0Q0390 OHSHOP SUPPLIES 0099-4231 000390 OHMILEAGE0039-4381 000392 OHmileage0039-4381 000191 OHCITIES BULLETIN SUBSCR 0174-4240 11187 OH AUDIT PAYMENT 11 0020-4300 21314 OHJ LABOR RELATIONS SUBSCR SE 0129-4306 000399 OH STEEL/LUMBER 0249-4232 7351 OH MAINT SOUAL 163 0129-4341 000376 OH Mi TNT SQUAD 164 0129-4341 000376 OH MAiNT SQUAD 166 0129-4341 000376 OH MAINT SQUAD 160 0129-4341 000376 OH MAINT SQUAD 165 0129-4341 U00376 OH MAINT SQUAD 162 0129-4341 000376 OH JAN SAC CHRG 9001-2226 000381 OH MARCH FEE 9673-1282 51480393 OH PESTICIDE APPLIC TRAINING 0590-4358 000384 OM \ i $17.97 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES$17.97 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES$17.98 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES$17.96 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES$17 96 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES$17.96 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES$98.75 MIDWEST BSNS PROD WASTE 1BASKETS$31.<4 MIDWEST BSNS PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES$237.97*$125.00 MINN DEPT OF HEALTH WTR OP - SCHOOL-PALMER$125.00 MINN DEPT OF HEALTH WTiT OP - SCHOOL-HANSEN$75.00 MINN DEPT OF HEALTH WTR OP SCHOOL-OBRIEN$75.00 MINN DEPT OF HEALTH WTR OP SCHOOL-GREGORY$75.00 MINN DEPT OF HEALTH WTR OP SCHOOL-OUAST$125.00 MINN DEPT OF HEALTH WTR CP SCHOOL-ShREEN$600.00*$75 00 MINN GOLF ASSN MGA MEMBER CLUB DUES oACCOUNTNUMBER Pi9e 4003#-0069-0129-0174-024i-D059-3099-3129-42104210421042i0421042104231421C INVOICE NO44I541C3348448541C334I448541C3348448541C3348448541C3348448541C3348000396000396 POnumber manual)S49)S49:S49)S49>5491549--4356•4356•4356435643564358 000382000382000382C00382000382000382'590-4380 000385020-4380 0003771T9-4322 907 174-4356 000379 174-4381 000379 301-3500 000397 572-2222 000337 129-4155 9204195 129-4355 9204196 29-4380 000371 20-4310 000395 29-4221 000391 49-4342 W2431279 10-4302 000314 19-4232 352786 fi-4232 352787 • • • OH OH f>0 oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. Ft8 17. 1993. 9:00 PMCHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER page 5INVOICE NO NUMBER MANUAL<•>27281 1993/02/22 $45.00*$70.00 MTI DIST CO MAINT SCHCOL TORO 300 0249-4356 000380 OH<» > 27282 1993/02/22 $70.00*$159.75 NAVARRE HARDWARE BLDG/GRDS MAINT SUPPLIES 0099-4231 000400 CH1993/02/22 $34.10 NAVARRE HARDWARE UTIL SYSTEM MAINT SUPPLIE 0549-4234 000400 OH1993/02/22 $27.06 NAVARRE HARDWARE UTIL SYSTEM MAINT SUPPLIE 0569-4234 000400 OH1993/02/22 $3.63 NAVARRE HARDWARE CLOG MAINT SUPP 0590-4231 000400 OH1993/02/22 $8.10 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS 0129-4232 000400 OH1993/02/22 $17.28 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS 0249-4232 000400 OH< * > 27283 1993/02/22 $249.92*$75,000.00 NORWEST BANK MINN,N.A.BOND PR INC DUE 3-1 0906-4610 91796 OH1993/02/22 $12,731.25 NORWEST BANK MINN,N.A.BOND INT DUE 3-1 0906-4620 S;796 OH1993/02/22 $200.00 NORWEST BANK MINN,N.A.PAYING AGENT FEE 0906-4630 91796 OH<•>27284 1993/02/22 $57,931.25*$248.32 NSP UTILITIES 0099-4324 000401 OH1993/02/22 $3.30 NSP UTILITIES 0175-4324 000401 OH1993/02/22 $7.37 NSP UTILITIES 0290-4324 000401 OH1993/02/22 $1,567.43 NSP UTILITIES 0549-4324 000401 OH1993/02/22 $794.33 NSP UTILITIES 0569-4324 000401 OH1993/02/22 $68.90 NSP UTILITIES 0590-4324 000401 OH<•>27285 1993/02/22 $2,689.65*$128.50 O’SI’UIVANi: NAVARRE AUTO MAINT 85 FORD 0174-4341 7364EM OH<•>27286 1993/02/22 $128.50*$15.96 OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE 0174-4381 000386 OH 1993/02/22 $35.28 OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE 0174-4381 000402 OH <•> 27217 1993/02/22 $51.24* $12.00 PERA INS INSURANCE 0129-4152 00C403 OH <•> 27288 1993/02/22 $12.00* $553.41 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIR VEH 8428 0249-4341 10770/3610T OH <•> 27289 1993/02/22 $553.41* $290.00 PLYMOUTH ROOFINQ/INSUL IN REPAIR ROOF-POST OFFICE 0099-4343 000388 OH <•> 27290 1993/02/22 $290.00* $102.00 POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT DEC 0080-4303 357948 OH 1993/02/22 $1,127.50 POPHAM HAIK 4. ASSOC LEGAL RETAINER DEC 0080-4301 357948 OH 1993/02/22 $1,733.60 POPHAM HAIK 8. ASSOC LEGAL APPLIC DEC 0840-4303 357948 OH 1993/02/22 $34.00 POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC LEGAL NELSON DEC 008C-4303 357948 OH 1993/02/22 $47.00 POPHAM HAIK g, ASSOC LEGAL SHORELANO ORD DEC 0080-4303 357948 OH 1993/02/22 $200.00 POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT DEC 0408-4303 357948 OH 1993/02/22 $127.50 POPHAM HAIK i, ASSOC LEGAL RE ARCHITECTS FEES 0480-4303 357948 OH 1993/02/22 $17.00 POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC LEGAL RE LAND OPTION SUIT 0480-4303 357948 OH <•> 27281 1993/02/22 $3,388.60* $88.68 PRAIRIE OFFSET BUSINESS CARDS 0174-4322 9895 OH 1993/02/22 $61.38 PRAIRIE OFFSET BUSINESS CARDS 0174-4322 9895 OH IS’ Itl^lOICC HO__NWBtK43S6 00038042314234-4234-4231-4232-4232 000400000400000400000400000400000400-4610 91^1*1-4620 &'.796 1-4630 91796A-4324 000401 L4324 000401 ^-4324 000401 A.4324 000401 5-4324 000401 ,5-5324 000401r4-4341 7364EM74-4381 000316 74*43«' 000402^28-4152 00C403249-4341 10770/3610T 099'4343 000388 >080- )0I0- )|40- 3010- 0080- 0408 0480 0480 4303 4301 4303 -4303 -4303-4303 -4303 -4303 35T948 3S7948 357948 357948 357948 357948 357948 357948 -4322 9895 ,-4322 989^ ‘ )f 3COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, FEB 17. 1993, 9:00 FM page 62729927300<•> 27302 < • > 2‘’303 <• > 27304 <•> 27305 <* > 27306 <•> 27307 CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL$150.08*199'.02/22 $4,507.09$4,507.09*PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 1/18-1/31 9999-2031 000404 OH1993/02/22 $4.66$4.66*RIT7 CAMERA FILM PROCESS 0129-4210 3762127 OH1993/02/22 $1,844.22$1,844.22*ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 9001-1260 8409 OH1993/02/221993/02/22 $65.52$53.25$118.77*SCOTT 08ERAIGNER SCOTT OBERAIGNER MILEAGE SEWER SCHOOL METER RENTAL 3/16-6/15 0569-43810129-4321 000387257475 OKOH1993/02/22 $3,004.00$3,004.00*SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES SR CITIZEN SERVICES 1ST Q 0100-4385 000389 OH1993/02/22 $610.55$619.55*SHAMROCK INDUSTRIES INC RECYCLING TUBS 0295-4232 076390-00 OH1993/02/22 $963.83$963.83*TOWN & COUNTRY FEB CLEANING 0099-4349 20193 OH1993/02/221993/02/221993/02/221993/02/221993/02/22 $42.26$76.67$73.90$228.66-$13.23$406.26*UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM MELANDER SL20 BATTERIES UNIFORM ERICKSON UNIFORM KING CREDIT MEMO 0129-42210129-42210129-42210129-42210128-4221 3903533S0353391107392524392524 OHOHOHOHOH1993/02/22 $663.00$563.00*UNIVERSAL HIGHWAY PROD PLOW PUSH FRAME 0249-4232 09442 OH1993/02/22 1993/02/22 $53.78 $31.55 $85.33* US WEST COFWUN US WEST COt^UN lELEPHONE-FEB TELEPHONE-FEB 0549-4320 0249-4320 000406 000406 OH OH 1993/02/22 $21.28 $21.28* VEE LIN MILEAGE 0039-4381 000405 OH 1993/02/22 $106.56 $106.5C* VESSCO INC MAI NT MISC EQUIP 0549-4342 2896 OH 1993/02/22 $1,600.00 $1,600.00* W HENNEPIN HUMAN SER 1993 CONTRIBUTION 0100-4385 000409 OH 1993/02/22 $369.77 $389.77* WARNING LITES OF MN FLASHERS 0249-4331 0042508 OH 1993/02/22 $397.50 $397.50* WAYZATA BAY CAR WASH 150 CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4341 000411 OH 1993/02/22 $2,610.00 WAYZATA-CITY OF 1ST QTR FIRE SERVICE 0133-4318 000407 OH O o CCOUNTUMBER INVOICE NO NUMBER98-203j 000404 OH29-4210 3762127 Oh01-1260 8409 OH69-43tl 000387 OH29-4321 357475 OH00-4385 000389 OH95-4232 076390-00 OH99-4349 20193 OH2S-4221 390353 OH29-4221 390353 OH29-4221 3ill07 OH29-4221 392524 OH29-4221 392524 OH19-4232 09442 OH I9-432C 000406 OHI9-432C 000406 OH 19-4381 00040S OH 19-4342 2896 OH 10-4385 000409 OH 19-4331 0042508 OH 9-4341 000411 OH 13-4318 0004Q7 OH O oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. FEB 17. 1993. 9:CO PM page .7ACCOUNTECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION NUMBER INVOICE NO number MANUAL82,610.00*27308<•>1993/02/22 815.40815.40*WECKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE 0174-4381 000408 OH273091993/02/22 8125.00 WILLIAMS CLOTHING UNIFORM CHESWICK 0129-4271 3815 OH1993/02/22 855.00 WILLIAMS CLOTHING UNIFORMS NELSON 0185-4221 3785 OH<•>1993/02/22 8687.008867.00*WILLIAMS CLOTHING PATCHES SEWN 0129-4221 3834 OHoC M1993/02/22 8723.368723.36*YOCUM OIL CO INC DIESEL FUEL 3-26-92 0249-4220 62049 OH27311<•>1993/02/22 88.34 .83 88.344.83* 8312.658.84*ZAHL EQUIPMENT CO GRACO LUBE EWUIP-FINAL 0484-4500 000410 OH Vi' 'k (J f<y o'„ I- V <• >'I . .- 'I CITYof ORONO ^ •, ^ i.;/ i^y ^ ' "l V;) ^ MimicipoJ OfKces Post Office Bo* 66 Minnesota 5£323-(XV6 TELEPHOM:.473-7357 • F.AJ^-473-0510 'FEB' 1 7 1993 '/ APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION^ lluSsMa^s CiTYOf 1 (MONO ' Commission Applying For: ^4" Parks Commission Planning Commission Community Task Force (Name) Name (A.V.I.i;^M g. (jQKjohle^s.16 Address 62>o l-Q(oe post office & Zip Code 5-535fe. Telephone (H)473-3192 (W)34'^- 9734 Resident of Orono n years. Work Experience: ^,sk-c(/ 'tUftM (^asuolh s>\dt ^ Jofa>SoJT ■ I'sCu^.o’i’ htygf&r .k> i^jLUei ^ C-'t rL^ Pw=v.out -fco /> rus>.ra.‘<u> ao^‘>^'i C/t Education L. civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present) : PorM£/^1 €lt »ygi3ir5>) Q>cui* i AJ .4tJ^e UOAiS /.(oos Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission (Please be as specific os possible. Ose additional sheet if necessary.) <Lik. KlCf^rx^lk, X' liX^ ^ haij<^ to Uvl^.iV nf AurvT^ loa^ sev~»ice o r^uikxJL^ Mp what is your view of th© rol© of th© Connnission? fVU^v\ \/CcJ 73 OuUouJ iVH (LreeJk (AeiCA^(o»*^ OjOPJ^. Tl<. Other Comments; (Ose this space to include any farther information you would like the City Council to consider, or that you feel is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) G>rtve. . - e. A'lz^ife^rs^ frJ c/ iH ^ Sc^aU QuiJi'ZLT 3r)^ ife 1979- 1 understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. Signature Date TO; PROM; DATE; Mayor .and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 11, 1993 SUBJECT: Planning for the City Facilities Open House Preliminary plans for an open house for the new city facilities need to be developed in the next few weeks in order to include information about the open house in the Spring newsletter. Some of the decisions to be made are as follows: 1. Selection of a date, time and day (weekday versus weekend). 2. Invitation list. 3. Should the dedication of Kelley Parkway be part of the grand opening. Mayor and City CouncilRon Moorse, City AdministratorFebruary 17, 1993SUBJECT: County Commissioner's Meeting to be Held in theOrono Council Chambers The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners is holding a series of meetings in suburban cities to provide better access to tiie Board for county residents. The Board has selected the Orono City Council Chambers as the site of one of these meetings. The: meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 30 from 7:00 P.M. to 9:30 P.M. •Vr L.eague of Minnesota Cities 3490 Lexington Avenue North St Paul, MN 55126 (612) 490-5600 pJministrators please note: This information was not mailed directly to councilmembers, please distribute it tp^ouz-coungil.—Thank you. n , ( J V-. You're Invited!9 U'S3 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST 1993 SAFETY AND LOSS CONTROL WORKSHOPS AND SPECIAL TELECONFERENCE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS LMCIT member cities are invited to attend a one-day workshop on safety and loss prevention issues which focus on practical steps cities can take to avoid losses and minimize the cost of losses that do occur. A copy of the program and the dates and locations for the workshops are enclosed. The Loss Control Workshops run from 8:30 am to J;30 pm and include tracks for administration, public works, police, and parks and recreation. Participants should fed free to move between tracks to hear presentahons on the topics which interest them Tleasc pass this invitation along to employees in your city's parks and recreation, maintenance, piihlie works, and police departments Registration * only $15 which includes a woikshop notebook and lunch. To register, just complete the blue registration form included with th's mailing For further information, contact either Lynda Woulfe, LMCIT, (612) 490-5o00 or Vivian Hart, Cuivemment Training Service, at (612) 222-7409. LMCIT has applied hr POST credits and Commerce Department continuing education credits for insurance agents SPFXTAL TELECONTERENCE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS This year, LMCIT will also held a special teleconference targeted at elected officials The fcleconferertce will be held on Thursday, May 13 and 'vill be broadcast at the Anoka, M itrhinson, Pine City, Si. Cloud, and Wadena Technical Colleges. Topics are targeted specifically for elected officials and include "Sexual harassment — policies and training", "Employment Issues’ . "Are you AW AIR", "Can we close this meeting'", and "Pay me know or pay me later" For a complete description of the issues covered, please refer to the enclosed progiam description The teleconference will begin at 6:00 pm and adjourn by 9:00 pm Registration is JIO per person and space is limited Registrations will be taken on a first-come, first-served basis, so register early To register, please complete the green registration hrm enclosed with this mailing Please note, if demand exceeds availability , LMCIT may schedule another session. SPKCIAL TELKCONFKRENCK FOR ELFX I ED OFFICIALS ONLY ON THURSDAY, MAY 13 -- 6:00 - 8:45 PM BROADCAST ON INI FR ACTIVE TV t‘'roni the Anoka. Hutchinnon. Pine City. St Cloud and Wadena Technical Colleges 6;00 - 6;05 pm 6.05 - 6:30 pm 6 30 - 7:00 pm 7.00 - 7:15 pm 7:15 - 7:45 pm 7:45 - 8 15 pm 8:15 - 8 45 pm Infrodiirtions - Sig Stene, Mayor of LmJstrom and Chairman, LMCU Board of Trustees "Sexual harassment - policies and training nrp imnortant** (Fresr'^fer: LMCIT Staff Attorney) There have been many cases and complaints against Minnesota cities for sexual harassment. We will discuss legal issue and definitions of sexual harassment and how cities can reduce the risk of such claims by establishing policies and training for their employees. "Eiiii>lo>meiit issues" (Fresvntcr Mtiry Rice, Attorney at Law, Jardinc, l.tigan. and O'Brien) Employment m Minnesota cities is an area of an increasing mimber of lawsuits and claims What laA's apply to cities and what do city officials need to know before they make any employment decisions? BREAK "Are you AWAIR?" (Presenter Dave St rock. Senior Loss Control Representative, Berkley Administrators) Compliance with this new law requires cities to have a comprenensive safety program, which can also save your city big money After listening to this summary of the law, you will be aware of AW'AIR "C’aii Hc tiose Ifiis mceliiig and if so, what can we disrns.s?" (Presenter Thomas (imndhoefer, Semor Staff Counsel, IM( ID This session will focus on the lelaiionslup of the Minnesot.i Open Meeting l aw and the Minnesota Data Privacy Act with a parficulai emphasis on per.sonnel issues "Pay me now or pay iiie later" (Presenter Pd Luez, Loss Control Consultant, Berkley Risk Services) Shrinking revenues budget concerns doing more with less These are issues facing elected city officials today, and for the foreseeable future So why ^ould elected city officials be concerned with pro#<.tivo loss control'’ This presentation will discuss the liability claims costs to cities in a couple of claim active areas sidewalk slip and frdts and parks and recreation The presentation will also discuss the things you as an elected official can do to support proactive loss control ctTorts and how It can save you money in the long term Registration Form Elected Ofllcials Teleconference Thursday, May 13, 1993 6:00 - 8:45 pm Sign me up! l wish to attend the teleconference at the following location Anoka Technical College. 1355 West Highway 10, Anoka Hutchinson Technical College, 2 Century Avenue, Hutchinson Pine City Technical College, 1100 Fourth Street, Pine City St. Cloud Technical College, 1540 Northway Drive, St. Cloud Wadena Technical College, 405 Colfax Avenue SW, Wadena Registration fee is $10 per person Name 1 Ule/City: Address: Phone Number ()Check Nl Mail registration form along with payment to; Government Training Service 480 Cedar St., Suite 401 St. Paul, MN 55101 Checks should be made payaole to Government Training Service and mailed no later than one week before workshop date. If is unahU- to (uxonwnnhiti: my n'iitsiration. / would he mtervsteJ m scheduhft}; onoihcr session ( ) Yes ( ) So Mound Volunteer ^efuiMmeni, Due,2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 / February 3, 1993 TO:Mayor Skip Johnson Mound City Council City Manager, Cd Shukle - O ffS 1 1 1993 FROM:Don Dryce, Fire Chief 1992 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT Fire and rescue calls were up 5% from 1991, So this year was the 2nd all time high on calls, with 486. Fire 197 and rescue 289. Up 1% on fires and up 7h on rescues. In Mound we were up 26^ on fires and down 3*. on rescues (104 fires and 165 rescues). Mounds total residential loss was substantial this year, arouitd $500,000, that's including contents as well. Two were undetermined or accidental, 3 lightening strikes, 4 improper installation of wood burning stoves, 2 auto/garage and 2 a short in the wiring. For the contracting cities: Minnetonka Deach - up 5^ on fires and down 45% on rescues (13 fires and 6 rescues) oaly $600 loss. Minnetrista - down 75% on fires and up 14% on rescues (16 fires and 40 rescues) $125,000 valuation loss. Cracks in fire place and soldering pipes started the two major fires and 1 commercial. Orono - down 16% on fires and up 16% on rescues (24 fires and 21 rescues) minimal valuation loss. Shorewood •* 3 fires and 1 rescue, $95,000 valuation loss. Spring Park down 6% on fires and up 43% on rescues (33 fires and 56 rescues), valuation loss approx $10,000 on a dryer fire, mainly smoke damage. The total for the contracting cities 89 fires and 124 rescues = 213 calls. Mutual Aid we received 2 from Maple Plain and 1 from St. Doni (that we canceled before they got to station). We gave 3 to Maple Plain and 1 to Excelsior. Two grass fires, 1 residential and 1 stand by. Training - I can't say enough of our fire dept. They know what they are doing. They are very well trained and they take pride in what they are doing, from attacking house fires, auto, grass fires etc.^ to saving lives due to heart, asthma diabetic, bleeding P.I.'s, water and ice rescue. The new heart start has saved lives, to our new gunby suits - for ice and water rescues. Along with "our” training we sent 10 to State Fire School, 2 to Fire Instructors Conference, 7 to State Fire Conference, 5 taking liaz Mat course, Mike Palm to arson class 1 & 2, two to State Chiefs and 1 to Int'l Chiefs Conference in Anaheim California. Almost all had *'®f*’®®her course on First Responders, 3 had their refresher on E.M.T.'s. One is a paramedic and ia going to school for Oxygen Therapy and I have one that is a Medial Student. J Pago ^ • Our maint<*nance is the .same - 3 heavy na int. i)crsonnel who work almost every Saturday. And each fire fighter has a turn once a month in their groups for maintenance. We had some take the liberty in painting the outside of station and putting a face lift to the front of the station. Hopefully we’ll get the back painted this Spring. For new equipment, that has changed too. We were talking and getting bids to refurbish our 1973 Mack (#12), that was put on hold because of lack of funds. Then for awhile we thought we would be getting more territory and the need for a better, newer, bigger tanker would have been a necessity and not as much refurbishing to #12. Now hopeful!f we can get a new pumper that would cost just a bit more instead of refurbishing *12 (hopefully we can trade in the Mack). I know the constant cut backs the City gets from State and Federal, wasn't ycur fault, but we must up grade our equipment to better serve our communities! Our building is old and again we are doing the best we can with people that will g;.ve us their time to fix, clean, repair, paint. It IS always the same ones who help and pretty soon they will get burned out or say, no one else cares, why should II My 2 Fire Marshals have full time jobs now, so they aren’t always available when needed for inspections, unles®; people can wait after hours and or on Saturdays. RELIEF HOARD - PKFSIl)LNT DAVID CARLSON The Board of Directors for the Mound Fire Department Relief Association will be continuing to monitor our investments for 1993. We plan to meet with Marquette Dank in mid February to review the performance of our investments for 1992 . In addition, we will be trying to determine the effects of the recent purchase of Marquette Dank by First Banks atid the impacts of the admi n ist rat ion of our accounts. The pension benefits were raised to $425.00 per month in 1992 after an actuarial study was conducted by Dordowick « Company. For 1993, the City increased their contribution to our pension fund by 7^ after several meetings to dircuss this program. Discussion was initiated concerning tne goals of the pension program which is expected to be continued in 1993. The Board of Directors has reviewed and updated its by-law which will be distributed in 1993 after they have been reviewed and approved by the membership. Interpretations on a couple of issues are being followed up on prior to finalising the by-laws. Page 3 1992 FIRE MA> ' T,S RKPORT - MIKE PALM It was another busy year and again not enough time to go through all the buildings we have in our fire area. I spent more time on complaints and meetings with the building inspectors, on the new businesses and problems that they came across. We have a lot of old buildings in our area that are not safe! A lot of code violations and without the time to properly inspect these buildings, we are facing a great danger to our Fire fighters and the people that enter these buildings. We have a lot apartment type housing in our area that needs to be brought up to code, and also we may lose some citizens if this is not looked at more carefully. With Jerry Dabb and myself both working 40 hours a week, we can't do the inspections we use to do. This year we couldn't even do all of the schools for "Fire Prevention Week" and this is the first place to start teaching young kids about fire safety. I was called to Grandview Middle School four times this year, to talk to kids that were experimenting with fire and that is scary. FIRE PREVEN'*’ION FIAS TO DE TAUGHT TO THE YOUNG AND OLD, HOPEFULLY THEY CAN LEARN AND LIVE DY IT I I Decphaven Excelsior Greenwood Long L('ke Medina Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Orono ^ Bonifadus Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bap Victoria Woodland I. II. III. rv. V. VI. VTI. 510 Srcond Street • P O. Box 473 • Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 (612) 474-5539 • Fax (612) 474-0430 33,£EB 1 0 1993 TAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1993 5:00 P-M. EXCELSIOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GYMNASIUM 441 OAK STREET, EXCELSIOR Call to Order Approval of January 1993 Minutes Reports a. Officers: Treasurer - January 1993 Check Register Fourth Quarter 1992 Report - b. Administrator/Production Coordinators c. Triax Cablevision - Pattrin Pattrin Unfinished Business a. Update on Hennepin County Auditors - Daniels b. Status of Channel 3 & City Council Meetings - Daniels c. New Commission Appointments for 1993 - Brancel d. Summarize Commission's Final Action on Regional Channel 6 - Brancel New Business a. Video Program of the Quarter Award - Brancel b. Accountant's Report on 1992 Financials — Sparks c. Reply to FCC on Section 8 (Customer Service) - Daniels d. Reply to FCC on Rate Regulation - Daniels e. Triax Report on Future Plans (current/long range)- Finch f. Committee to Handle Nominations and Election of Officers at May 18, 1993 Full Commission Meeting - Brancel g. Report on 1993 MACTA Annual Conference - Stanga, Thies Matters From tlie Floor Ad joumment lake MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1993, 5:00 PM 540 SECOND STREET, EXCELSIOR I. CALL TO ORDER . c d mChair Brancel called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. DIRECTORS PRESENT Barb Brancel/Shorewcod, Chair Jim Olda/Excelsior, Vice Chair Tim Pactrin/Orono, Treasurer Tim Saiazar/Minnetrista, At Large Ann C. Thies/Medina, At Large OTHERS PRESENT Jim Daniels/Adninistrator Colleen Lindskoog/Admin Asst. Jim Schindler/Production Coord. Mary Peterson/Asst. Product. Coord. Rick Finch/Triax Cablevision Chuck Slocum/Channel 6 :t.APPROVAL OF MINUTES Brancel asxed for November 17, 1992 meeting. Motion 1.19.93.1_ _ _ t;on passed unanimously. discussion or motion to approve the minutes of tne Pattrin moved to approve the minutes. Thies seconded. Mo­ or Noverooer '92 and III. REPORTS a) Treasurer's Report ^ Pattrin described financial transactions tor the months December^^92^ l.ig.93.2 Olds moved to approve the Check Disoursements for the period of 11/1/92 through 12/31/92. Salazar seconded. Motion passed unaniaousli . DanJeir'^stated *^that~ the open house that vas held in .November was mildly surcpssful. approximately 10 city staff and mayors attended. ^ Daniels, giving a brief update on S.12 legislation, stated "°'*maCTA ’is vcc-n hands. Thev are researchina it and are workino on imolementir.a it. MAuTA for NATOA to finish their report to the FCC before submittinc their own report All 14 cities of the Commission have received notices reaardino Commisa .nnn,nrmenra. The Cities have until Januarv 31. 1993 to submit their list of stated that Conaressman Ramstad was in the studio and met with Saxara^^ Salazar then Stated that Ramstad was verv impressed with the stated .etndio and that he emoved workino with Chair Brancel and That the tape is worth viewina. Ramstad had told Daniels that he would emov Daniels explained that he has been workino for a month or so to develop a for Senator, and Representatives to come into the studio and discuss what is ooino '""^ntelTsaid that, althouoh not budoeted for. a new printer for the computer is o-ed-d. Commissioner Markle had brouont in a model "!rcil«. a new was verv imnressive, Daniels then reoueated approval for #350 '^''^"^o:aor'ia9'93!3'"""'salaza.^ moved to approve a350 - .4C0 beino allocated for a new nrinrer. Pattrin seconded. Motion oassed unanimouslv. h) Prnrliirtlnn R^nort , am im in ......r::..;::;.■ ..... end awaw names). LMCCC - January 1993 Meeting Page Two Workshop sessions begin this week. The bill stuffers have The classes are not only full, we now have a waiting list for Brancel thanKed Tnax for the bill stuff ers. c) Tnax Report Finch distributed the Channel 20/21 Prograaming Suaoary and subscriber report: Homes Passed 11,916 Basic Subs 139 Expanded Basic Subs 6,385 Total Pay Units 3,760 Total A/O’s 4,431 Total Remotes 2,159 been very effective, the spring sessions. the December monthly Finch stated that two new technicians will be worxing in help with response time for subscribers. Hooefully, they will be 1993. tnis area, in pi ace which will by Feoruary IV. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Regional Channel 6 Update Chuck Slocum from Regional Channel 6 was late arriving, so this later in the meeting.was tabled until V. a) NEW BUSINESS Discussion on Thirty Homes Per Mile Ratio for New Construction Salazar stated that he had received a number of calls regarding cable subscriptions in the Minnetnsta area and was hoping to work with Finch .n trying to get cable into some of these areas that aren't currently receiving it. Thies stated sh® had as well gotten a number of calls regarding the Medina area. Finch explained that this formula of 30 hemes/Qile was so that a capitol return is received, cost effectively suppling cable into new developments is a big problem, however, developers generally will contribute. March 1993 is a target month for meeting with the developers in some areas to try and supply cable lines. Salazar appreciated the comments by Finch, however felt that it needed to be brought up to the Commission to begin the process. b) Report on Hennepin County Auditor Daniels stated that in the last week of December 1992, Hennepin County wanted to come out and look at the original Dowden proposal. They wanted to see the financial projections that Dowden had come up with back in 1903 and figure a tax assessment on these. However, Daniels questioned the fact that these are strictly projections and how can they be used for assessment. Bottom line is they want to implement a tax on cable company for utilizing the city's easement. Which me«i.a a S2 - S3 per month subscriber charge would be put on the Tnax bill starting in Feoruary 1993. Daniels stated that he has contacted the Commission's attorney, Tom Creighton, ha has been trying to figure it out. His analysis is that they arm using Proposition the per and 13, which was passed in California, as a basis. Daniels then stated that he would continue to monitor the situation. Finch concurred with Daniels in his concern for this situution. Triax has begun preparing for the tight if Hennepin County proceeds with these plans. At this point, however, the status is really an unknown and would monitor it as well. Daniels asked Finch if he had reem.vet any official notification to place this on the February 1993 bills. Finch stated that no he hasn't. LMCCC - January 1993 Heeting Page Three oalazar said that this increase would go against everything tne Cable Commission has been fighting for with the new legislation. He then asked if an official resolution should be drafted. Daniels stated that the attorney has recommended that the Commission do nothing at this time, as Hennepin County has not made it's intentions clear. Thies asked about statutory exemptions and if these should be looked at. rincn stated that would be part of the plan if it comes to ? legal battle with the county. Olds stated he feels that keeping informed is very important, however, he hates to see the Commission spending money on any action at this point considering that this is a city wide if not a state wide problem. Pattrin suggested that the Comr.ission write a letter to the newspapers to let the people know what's going on, so that if this takes place the Commission is not blamed for not taking action to stop it. Olds stated that at this point, the county hasn't mace their position clear and the Commission should wait to do anything as the attorney advised. Salazar concurred witn Olds in waiting to take action, however, wanted to go on record as stating that he feels this would be an outrageous increase. Daniels said that the a2-S3 charge should not be on any bill without Triax informing the Commission prior to it's appearance. c) Status of Beginning City Council Coverage Daniels stated that five cities will be covered and they are Snorewood, Tonjca Bay, Excelsior, Spring Park and Victoria. They will be cablecast on Channel 8 starting sometime in February 1993. Brancel stated that council coverage is a great way to communicate with constituents. Daniels said that any other city wisning telecasts of council mee'.ings could be included in the 1994 budget, as it is drafted. VI. a) UNFINISHED BUSINESS Continued Kegional Channel 6 Update Brancel introduced Chucx Slocum from Channel 6. Slocum distributed a list of options for resolving the reception problem and gave a brief synopsis of eac.^ (see attached). All those listed would cost aore than Channel 6 can afford. However, a campaign is currently being planned for raising funds. They are hoping for a possible $200,000 being available for technical enhancement in approximately a year or so. Pattrin asked if the Excelsior studio is in line of sight of Pillsbury and if so using it Instead of the Mound Studio as head end. Daniels saio that no it would not Batter if it was in Excelsior or Mound the signal is still blocked. Brancel said that the options given do not seem feasible without the funds and even if they were possible they would taxe 6 Bonchs to a year to lapleBent. SIocub concurred. Salazar asked the Coamission to refer to Motion 11.17.92.4 which reads *Salasar aoved in favor of tape delay programming anu that at the January 1993 meeting of the CoBBission Channel 6 reports with a final decision of whether to expend the funds to repair ^he reception problea when a solution is found. Thies seconded. Motion passed unanimously. * Salazar then asked if this motion will be followed at this seating, seeing a 'final decision* has not been deterained by Channel 6. Brancel stated tnat sne concurs with Salazar in that this should be She then offered the solution of teaporariiy removing Channel 6 and allowing them the tiae to repair the reception probleBs Channel 6 now has and during this interie replacing it With C-SPAN II. how decided upon. 1 t % ••«• * 1 «> « 4 .■I « » mCCC - January 1993 Heating Page Four the right that are tc aa Daniels said that according to the attorney, the Commission has delete Channel 6 if it is not technically acceptable and the steps to do follows: Step 1. Inform Triax that the carriage of Channel 6 is not in compliance due it's reception. (This step was done approximately 5 months ago.) Step 2. Triax requests of the Commission a waiver to pull Channel 6 because it commercially impracticable to be carried. Step 3. Commission grants the waiver to Triax and Cnannei 6 is pulled, with stipulation that if it is ever determined to be technically acceptable it must returned. Daniels then stated that when the waiver takes place, Channel 6 could go darx or be replaced with something else. Finch stated that if it is replaced, the replacement show would become a permanent part of the line-up and if Channel 6 returned the new snow would be moved to somewnere else in the line-up. Olds emphasized that we must follow the steps as outlined by Daniels. Motion 1.19.93.4_ _ _ _Salazar moved in accordance with legal council's advice, that It be turned over to Triax to determine if Channel 6 is commercially impracticable. the be Pattrin seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Motion 1.19.93.5 Salazar moved tnat it be recoonended to Triax tnat they request a wai/ar from the Commission to no longer carry Channel 6 due to it s technically unacceptability. Pattrin seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Daniels then explainea that at this point it is up to Triax. Finch stated that Triax u officially requesting a waiver from the Commission to pull Channel 6 due to it being commercially impracticable. Motion 1.19.93.6_ _ _Salazar moved that the Commission grant Triax's waiver request and that Triax lemove Channel 6, with the stipulation that if carriage of Channel 6 is ever determined to be practical, by the Lake Minnetonka (.able (.ommission, it must oe carried in the future. Pattrin seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Brancel requested that C-SPAN II be implemented in place of Channel 6. Pattrin suggested NASA Select as another option. Olds concurred with Pattrin in that there ar© other options, but would like the Commission to wait for a report from Finch in what channels would be available. Finch stated that the Commisfuon has no real say in channel carriage. Motion 1.19.93.7_ _ _ _ _ Pattrin moved that Channel 6's replacement be a public ffi»rvira r.hannAl and not a commercial channel. Salazar seconded. Brancel stated that she prefers C-SPAN II oue to the amount of received for it. Olds restated that he was uncomfortable dictatino a Daniels stated that the Commission doesn't want to leave it totally up a nav channel, for example, be olaced in that vacant spot. Finch stated tnat Triax will commit to carrvino C-SPAN II in reouests she has channel to Triax. to Triax. So that place of Reoional thisChannel 6 within 60 davs. This process would beam with a bill stuffer exolaininn awifr.h to subscribers. B.-ancel called for the vote. Motion passed unanimously. Motion 1.19.93.0 Salazar moved that C-SPA.S II be the replacement for Reoional rhAoni*! f%, Olrin «Aconded. Motion oassed unanlaoualv. Brancel stated to Slocum that the oroarammina on Channel 6 is verv oood and that the Commission will brino it back as soon as the reception is acceptable. Slocum stated that as of now. without funds or new technoloav. there are no other rea) solutions. He then thanxed th* Commission for their oatience with trvxna to resolve this issue. Brancel said that the door would be left open to Channel 6. ranielfi stated that he wojld be meetino with Senators and Recresentatives this iraeir and will explain this action to them. Brancel then asked if Slocum could keep Daniels abreast of the situation in tie f lit iir. I.HCCC - Januarv 1993 Meetina Pa F i vf> VTI. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR Patr.rin askeH if American Wirelesa has to oav a franchise fee to air in this area. naniAi.^ stated that as of now, thev are considered over the air like a broadcaster. Pattnn stated that a broadcaster is one channel, American Wireless is a multi-channeJ r.arrler like a cable comoanv. He then asked what we can do. Darnels stated that MACTA is lookina into it but has no time frame of when it will reach a conclusion of some sort. Olds stated it is similar to the telecom oroblems currently in the news. Pattnn then asked how will homes receive sionals from American Wireless. Daniels said he believes it will be a small dish. aoDroximatelv 15" in diameter, mounted on the ronf. Finch stated that the ordinances will create some lecal oroblems for Am. Wireless. Pattnn stated that the onlv wav he sees to even thinos out between cable comoanies and Am. Wireless would be for As. Wirelesa to also oav a 5X franchise fee. Brancel asked for other matters from the floor. Salazar stated that he wanted it known for the record that he feels Jim Daniels and staff have done an outstandina lob in 1992. Daniels has increased the visibilitv of the Commission tremendously for the better. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion 1.19.93.9 Olds moved to adjourn. Pattnn seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted Colleen Lindskoog Adeinistrative Assistant /cl Metro Cable Net '^'/ork 1C5 5fh Avenue South. Suite 485 • Mlnneccoils, MN 550t (612) 339-3221 /FAX (61 2) 339-31 c LAKE MINNETONICA CABLE : TRANSMISSION OF MCN7 CHANNEL 6 OPTION Standard ISSLTS ESTINLATED COST ReceDdon unacceptable because f Hne ot » * sight ber.veen Pillsbury and Moui .ad ena. Provided; value $6,500/vr. 694 It mav not work since siscnai is amplified S25K, teci-inical quality Overpass too many times prior to reaching head end. not assured. .Amer’can V/ireless No Channel space available for IDS trans­ mission of new 22 Ch.annel sendee to home subscribers. New eauicm.ent costs in Mound* ^ undetermined. Direct competitor to cable A operating companies. Monthly Charge of $17.95 plus new equipment costs Bicydir.g of Tapes riming; cost of tapes; cost of added personnel S3K/mo. payroll; new for .MCN/6 Tria.x in Mound. Equipment Cost, equipment in Mound S50K. Satellite Technology e.xists but changing; MSC currently sends signal to area. Estimated $100 K/Mo. with Teieport Minnesota. Microwave Apply for special microwave License; transmission special arrangements with third party.i.e, Paragon. $60K one time cost; mainter.ance $5K annually plus add-ons. Paragon hook-up Paragon fiber is several miles from Triax/Lake Minnetonka hook-up. To be negotiated; fibej costs S50K/mile (est.) LTsTTE UofM Channel space was not available for 24 hours/dav service to Mound. Value at least S500/mo., one time 560K charge. US West Fiber Fiber lines carry signal to IDS; then transmit to Mound head end. $1,800 mo. roof rental/fiber cost; one time transponder/ receiver costs of $60 K. Presented to Lake .Mi.nr ^tenka Cable Commission 1/19/93 M I lAKr: MTMN17T0NKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CITY APPOINTMENTS FOR 1993 (updated 2/5/93) [Bold italic names are Executive Committee; cc- city council member; *-alternate director; no notation indicates community resident] DEEPHAVKN Dale Moe (cc) 20465 Linwood Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 474-7204 H 339-8931 O Dennis Stanga 3610 Montgomerie Way2ata, MN 55391 475-0745 EXCETJ^TOR Jim Olds 100 Lake Street Excelsior, MN 55331 474-4139 GREENWOOD Jimmie Wright(cc> 5990 Maple Hgts. Rd. Greenwood, MN 55331 474-7693 Robert Murphy(cc) 176 Maple St. Excelsior, MN 55331 474-9514 Jan Gray 5170 Meadville St. Greenwood, MM 55331 474-8139 David Stahr* 142 First St. Excelsior, MN 478-9407 55331 James Hi11is* 5480 Maple Hgts. Rd. Greenwood, Mli 55331 542-9122 LONG TAKE Jim Hartriel (cc) 1658 Bollum Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 473-8806 Scott Luse 1700 Bollum Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 476-6137 Ann C. Thiesfcc) 1922 Willow Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 476-2877 H 941-3343 O MINNETONKA BEACH Bobbi Abdo 3126 Old Cty Rd. 15 Wayzata, MN 55391 471-0063 Thomas Markle(cc) 2508 Areola Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 471-9777 H 471-0388 O MINNETRISTA Tim S&laxar(cc) 3605 Tuxedo Road Minnetrista, MN 55364 472-5191 ORONQ (cc) NOT APPOINTED AS OF 2/5/93 Tim Pattrin 1360 Railroad Ave. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 475- 1921 H 476- 3099 O APPOINTMENTS 1993 - page two vi ST. BONTFACTUS Andrew Weinzierl Jr» icc) 9125 State Hwy 7, P.O. Box 26 St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 446-1188 SHOREWOOD Barbara Brancel (cc} 23690 Gillett Curve Shorewood, m 55331 474-3824 Robert Gagne 24850 Amlee Road ShorewocJd, MN 553 31 474-5783 li SPRING PARK Harlyn Dill(cc) 3811 Togo Road Spring Pk, MN 55384 471-C185 Carl Rosen 4540 West Am Rd. Spring Pk, MN 55384 471-9617 Mark Breneman* 4014 Sunset Spring Pk, MN 55384 471-7555 * % TONKA BAY Jerry Anderson(cc) 224 West Point Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 470-0889 Bob Anderson 225 West Point Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 474-4984 Lesley Hughes-Seamans* 5090 Manitcu Rd Tonka Bay, Mil 55331 474-6018 i VldPflA Susan Hines (cc) 8114 Crchid, Box 321 Victoria, MN 55386 443-2644 David Lindgren (cc) 8070 81st Street Victoria, MN 55386 443-2391 Nick Duff (cc) 2830 Maplewood Road Woodland, MN 55391 473-9189 Sidney Wear 18205 Breezy Ft. Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 473-7130 Deephaven Excelsior Greenwood Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Beach Mlnnetrista LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Crono St. Bonifacius Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay i^ctoria Woodland 540 Second Streft • P.O. Box 473 • Excelsior. .Minnesota 55331-0473 (612) 474-5539 • Fax (612) 474-0430 January 22, 1993 Mr. Ken Roaland, Chair Regional Channel 6 105 Fifth Avenue South 4485 Minneapolis, Mil 55401 Dear Mr. Rosland: ""his 13 official notification that because of quality, with no financially acceptable means Cablevision has requested a waiver on the Channel 6. substandard technical of correction, Triax carriage of Regional After much discussion and considerable Cable Comaiission, Triax Cablevision and Regional Channel 6 staff time, there was no other solution but to g^^ant the request to temporarily delete Regional Channel 6 from the Triax Cablevision system. It is important to note that in this process of removing Regional Channel 6, the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission ordered that if it la ever determined to b»> technically acceptable it must be returned to the cable system on channel 6. The Cable Commission also hopes that Regional Channel 6 staff will continue to work toward a solution that will once again permit carriage. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Barbara Brancel Chair BB/cl be: Rick Finch, Triax Cablevision Full Commission macMinnesota Association C able Television AoministsatorsP.O. Sox 266SS, Mlnn«opolU MN 55426 January 20, 1993 James M. Stroramen Holmes & Graven 470 Pillsbury Canter Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Strommen: I an writing on behalf of the board of di’-ectors '^eLvisicn Lttntll7.lfs.Tt has cab?erarweU afutUiS^re^ft^the SRA's authority into t“rexLiL"'=”of citiescommissions, to the detriment Sion ^ SRA and a cable co;^?|-“ leaH-iniJ Other hand, we are cognizant of the advances tha- arr« a convergence in telephone and cable television tech- SRA recognize the experience and expertise that theSRA has developed in the area of utility rata recu 1 aM^ MACTA would welcome the opportunity to explore wavs^** anniiAi ®®tership. To that end, we invite you to attend our Plvmouth°”^T^h”^^' which is scheduled for January 29-30 in yo^? infcnnatJir ^ «P>' conference agenda for dis=uf"i°^°^^?lAtn:*fr^"=^*rcL“^e"ra=t°L=r" Sinc^ely, Coralie A^ilson Vice-President e.'»P'rr r'°* . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ^ _ _ _ _ . _ Deephaven Excelsior Greenwood Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Orono St. Bonifaclus Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Victoria Woodland 540 Second Street • P.O. Bo» 173 • Excelsior. Minnesota 55331-0473 (612) 474-5539 • Fax (612) 474-0430 DATE: January 25, 1993 TO:The Federal Coininunications Commission (FCC) Tji the Matter of Implementation of Section 8 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 Docket No. 92—263 Consumer Protection and, Customer Service RgPEY COMMENTS OP TAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMTSS-»^ON The Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission submits these reply com­ ments in the above-captioned proceeding. The Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission acknowledges the comments submitted by the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, and the National Association of Counties regarding this proceeding. The Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission believes that the comments filed by other local authorities will also reflect the Cable Commission's position on the implementation of Section 8 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Act"). Accordingly, the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission stresses the importance of those remarks filed by local authorities and respectfully requests the Federal Communications Commission to care­ fully consider these comments. I ■i Page 2 The Lake K’nnetonka Cable Commission believes that the FCC should adopt a set of specific standards which will ensure adequate customer service throughout the country. The FCC-established stan­ dards should be self-executing and should apply to all cable systems as of the date of adoption of the standards by the FCC, without any further action to be taken by the local franchising authority. The general rule that the FCC-established standards will apply to all cable operators should be subject to three exceptions: 1) where a franchising authority determines to waive one or more of the FCC standards in favor of less stringent standards; 2) where the franchising authority has more stringent customer service standards already in place; or 3) where a franchising authority exercises its right to promulgate more stringent standards or standards not ad­ dressed by the FCC standards. Franchising authorities should be primarily responsible for en­ forcing the FCC-established standards. The FCC, if necessary, should act as a final arbiter of disputes between franchising authorities and cable operators. The Lake Minnetonka Cable Comaission believes that the FCC should establish comprehensive consumer protection rules. Customer service was a paramount concern of Congress in the passage of the 1992 Act. The legislative history of the 1992 Act is filled with testimony from cable subscribers, consumer groups and franchising authorities documenting customer service problems that are evident in both large and small systems. The Cable Commission has experienced and handled numerous subscriber complaints that range from invalid service disconnection, to confirmed cable installation that never takes place, and numerous service calls resolve one cable television related oroblem. Page 3The Lake Minnetonka Cable Conroisson urges the FCC not to adopt the NCTA standards. While the NCTA standards nay provide a useful starting point in crafting a set of custoner service standards, they are lacking in two key respects: they are neither stringent nor specific enough, and they do not address issues and areas that should be addressed, such as credits for a failure by the cable operator to keep a service call and credits for a failure by the cable operator to correct an outage or other reception problem, under their control, in a prompt manner. The Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission believes that the approach proposed by local authorities, as filed in their comments, will en­ sure adequate customer service for cable subscribers in our fourteen communities, as well as throughout the country, and will not create any unreasonable burden on the cable operators. Respectfully submitted. Barbara Brancel, Chair Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission 540 Second Street, Box 47.3 Excelsior, MN 55331-0473 (612) 474-5539 BB/cl Dcephaven Excelsior Greenwood Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista LAKE MtNNETOSKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Orono St. Bonifaclus Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Victoria Woodland 540 Second Street • P.O. Box 473 • Excelsior. Minnesota 5533l*0473 (612)474-5539 • Fax (612) 474-0430 CONTACT; FOR IMr-^EDIATS RELEASE Jin Daniels. Administrator Lake Minnetonka Cable Corainission (612) 474-5539 1993 CABLE COMMISSIONERS APPOINTED The Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission, representing fourteen cities in the Lake Minnetonka area, recently announced the Cable Commission appointments for 1993. "Each city is represented by a city council member,” according to Cable Commission Chair Barb Brancel, "and most have also appointed a city resident as their second full commissioner.” Listed below are the 1993 Cable Commissicner(s) for each city: Deephaven (cc)Dale Moe Dennis Stanga Excelsior (cc)Robert Murphy James R. Olds Alternate:David Stahr Greenwood (cc)Jimmie Wright Jan Gray Alternate:(cc)James Hi11is Long Lake (cc)Jim Hartfiel Scott Lose Medina (cc)Ann C. Thies Bobbi AbdoMinneton.ka Beach (cc)Tnomas Markle Minnetrista (cc)Tim Salazar Tim PattrinOrono(cc)Unappointed St. Scnifacius (cc)Andrew Weinzierl Shorewood (cc)Barbara Brancel Robert Gagne Serino Park (cc)Harlyn Dill Carl Rosen Alternate:(cc)Mark Breneman Tonka Bay (cc)Jerry Anderson Bub Andersen Alternate:Lesley Hughes-Seamans Victoria (cc)Susan Hines (cc)David Lindgren Woodland (cc)Nick Duff Sidney Wear The Cable Commission administers franchise compliance with Triax Cablevision, and represents all cable sxibscribers and city residents with the FCC and Congress, in cable related rules/regulation. Anyone interested in more information can contact Jim Daniels, Commissicn Administrator, at 474-5539. , I Deephaven Excehior Greenwood Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 540 Second Sireet • P.O. Box 473 • Excelsior. Minnesota 55331-0473 (612)474-5539 • Fax (612) 474-0430 OronoSt. Boni/acius Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Victoria Woodland FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Jiai Daniels, Administrator Lake Minnetonka Cable Comisission (612) 474-5539 i 4 STATE LEGISLATOR SHOW With the 1993 Minnesota State Legislature in session, the State Senators and State House of Representatives froa three Districts (34, 43, 45) are creating a weekly television program to keep their constituents informed on any legislation that may effect them- One of the eight Legislators (Sen. Ed Oliver, Sen. Gen Olson, Sen. Martha Robertson, Rep. Ron Abrams, Rep. Jerry Knickerbocker, Rep. Steve Smith, Rep. Todd VanDellen and Rep. Ton WorJeaan) will host each weekly shew, and determine the topics and guests for that thirty minute segment. If you like this method of communication, please call thera with your thoughts on the weekly topics. i LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT r" 'r 900 E. Wayzata Blvd, Suite 160, Wayzata MN 55391 473-9708 Tuesday Tuesday Thursday Thursday *W&daiio iiayi Thursday Saturday Monday Friday Monday ♦Wednesday Wednesday 02/04/93 k. 15 19 22 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE FEBRUARY 1993 . (*as amended) FE3 8 1393 Lake Access Task Force Access Siting Subcommittee 7:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Lake Access Task Force Steering Committee 8:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Water Structures Unrestricted Watercraft Subcommittee 8:30 an, LMCD Office, Wayzata Administrative Committee 3:30 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Lake Access Task Force 7.0 8 plfi» lU a Community Center LMCD Save The Lake Recognition Banquet 6:15 pm. Lord Fletchers of the Lake Water Structures Committee 7:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata Legal Holiday, Office Closed Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata Lake Use and Recreation Committee 4:30 pm, #135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata 7:00 pm.Tonka Bay City Hall LMCD Board of Directors Regular Meeting 7 :30 pm.Tonka Bay City Hall LAKE ACCESE TASK FORCE Cancellation Notice Meeting of Tuesday, February 10, 1993 Reschedule Notice Meeting of Thursday, March 18, 1393 The Lake Access Task Force Steering Committee, at its February 2 meeting, concluded that there is more review to be accomplished on the Access Siting Subcommittee work before it will be prepared for recommendations to the Task Force members. Minutes of the Steering Committee are enclosed. Minutes of the Access Siting Subcommittee are enclosed. Minutes of the Agreements Subcommittee are enclosed. Please note that a draft Lake Access Parking Agreement is enclosed. The Steering Committee concurs with the Agreements Subcommittee that this Agreement meets the needs as detailed in the Parking Standards adopted by the Lake Access Task Force in October, 1992. Cities end agencies responsible for a public access(s) are invited to review this Agreement for applicability to its particular circumstances. The Agreements Subcommittee will be coordinating appointments with select agencies and cities to include designated spokespersons of the Lake Access Task Force, ® administrators, the LMCU board member and staff of the HN UNR and LHCD to review the Lake Access Parking Agreement in the weeks ahead. Please save the enclosures for discussion at the March 18 I^ke Access Task Force meeting, place to be announced. Thank youl J Ii. LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE Access Siting Subcommittee 7:05 pm, Tuesday, February 2, 1993 LMCD Conference Room 135, Norwest Bank Bldg. Present:Chair Don Germanson, LMLOA; Nick Duff, Woodland: Dave Cochran, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Jim Grathwol, Excelsior; Gordon Kimball, hike Markell, DNR; John Schneider, MN Sportfishing Congress; Executive Director Gene Strommen OBJECTIVES REVIEW. Upon presentation of the objectives forwarded by the Lake Access Task Force, items a, b and c, there was no recommendation for change. ACCESS RESOURCE MATERIAL. 1. DNR Land Owner's Bill of Rights. Kimball and Markell offered an overview of this procedure for handling public access land acquisition. The Bill of Rights was actually enacted by the state legislature in the mid-70's. Confidentiality during the negotiation process with a willing seller is the key element of the Bill of Rights. The risk of outside public pressure on a willirg seller prior to this Bill of Rights did result in many sales being thwarted or withdrawn. It is essential for the DNR to utilize this process Kimball and Markell concluded. It was the process used in the Maxwell Bay site purchase. 2. 1983 and 1986 Task Forc»' Studies. Germanson stated he believes it is important tc keep the elements of past studies relating to public “rcess siting be kept in front of the subcommittee and Task Force during this process. The 1983 Criteria/Goals to be used in evaluating acrlectlng potential new access sites for fishing craft and small recreation boats was reviewed. This outline appears on pages 16 and 17 of the '83 Task Force Study. It was recommended the outline be used as a "Site Suitability Ranking Criteria" outline, using a high, medium and low ranking system. Amendments to the criteria were offered, and will be reviewed as amended by the subcommittee at its March 9 meeting. Public Access Sites, Appendix C, from the '83 Task Force report was circulated. Many of these prospective sites no longer exist due to site development or determination that they would net qualify per current Parking Standards 3. Slide Show of Current Access Sites. Germanson reported he was unable to do the aerial flight from which the slides would be prepared. He expects to have it ready for the next meeting. Access Silting Subcommittee, Minutes, 2/3/93, P. 2 4. Current Site Improvement Schedule. The following sites were identified as under consideration for projected parking improvement or in need of access improvement: • Trunk Hwy 101 Causeway, under EIS review currently. • Grays Bay Dam, related to 101 Causeway redevelopment • Wayzata Bay, County Rd. 16, unsafe traffic patterns • Carsons Bay, Deephaven, nearby parking restricted • North Arm. Orono anticipates County Rd 51 will be restricted, no C/T parking if Maxwell Bay access opens • Spring Park, maintenance yard in Orono under study • Mound Park, Cooks Bay, off-street parking available in nearby private lots to be negotiated. » Kings Point Access, und-^ • existing agreement with Hennepin Parks this wouj.d be closed. 5. Prospective Sites Discussed. Many sites were discussed by the subcommittee as prospective access locations. No action was deemed appropriate at this time. Markell offered to locate a detailed list from the '83 and '86 Task Force studies to assist the subcommittee's awareness of previous prospective sites around the lake. £». Procfc'dure for Handling Access Site Offers and Inquiries. The draft procedure prepared by LMCD staff in response to a Task Force member's concern that an open procedure is needed has been reviewed by DNR legal counsel. According to Kimball, DNR counsel advises that this draft does not maintain the element of confidentiality, as noted in para. 1 above. DNR counsel also observes that terms of this draft procedure places the burden on the property owner to Justify that the owner's property is suitable for an access. MN Statute 8402. "74 75 covers the confidentiality for a prospective seller, Kimball added. It was pointed out in the discussion that a city would have an advance role in assessing a property's suitability for s public access if it is advertised for sale. However, where confidentiality is iTiportant to the seller, MN Statute provisions will apply. Based upon the above observations, it was the subcommittee's unanimous concensus that the draft procedure for handling offers and inquiries concerning potential public access sites on Lake Minnetonka be dropped from further consideration, and be so recommended to the Lake Access Task Force. Access Siting Subcommittee, Minutes, 2/3/93, P. 3 ACCESS SITE GOALS: 1. Geographic Balance. Schneider reported an observation that public accesses users prefer accesses reasonably distributed from east to west, and north to south. This is recommended in the Zone criteria of the 83 study. 2. Fev Larger Sites vs. Many Smaller Sites. Locating a public access site becomes more difficult for the user as the number increases. Smaller sites may fill, forcing a move to another site until an opening is found. Four to five large sites on the lake, geographically balanced, also effords more manageable controls for inspection, maintenance an--* other regulatory purposes Schneider added Larger size sites were suggested to be 75 or more car/trai.’er spaces per site. 3. Proximity to Major Roads. Ease of location for public \jS0 favors locations on county trunk highways wherever possible. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: i. MN DOT presentation on Trunk Hvy 101 Causeway Access options was suggested for a future meeting. Germanson will inquire as to availability of a presentation. NEXT MEETING, ADJOURNMENT. 6:30 pm, Tuesday, March 9, was recommended for the next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 pm. Resjiectfully s_ubmit^.fd, _ _ _ _ _ _ EugeneyR. Stromm?h Executive Director LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE Agreements Subcommittee Meeting Report 7:00 pm, Tuesday, January 26, 1093 LMCD Conference Room 160, Horwest Bank Bldg Present:Subcommittee Chai.r Mike Bloom, Minnetonka Beach; Jim Grathwol, Excelsior; Mike Brandt, Hennepin County Environmental Services; Gary Larson, MSBF and FAIR; Executive Director Gene Strommen MODEL CAR/TRAILER ACCESS PARKING AGREEMENT: A draft model agreement was reviewed as prepared by Strommen and Kimball. A brief one-page agreement statement is to be accompanied by two exhibits or attachments, namely: Checklist for evaluating the parking agreement Plan indicating location of c/t parking spaces The draft agreement was reviewed with a number of sugc-’stions to continue the simplification process, as well as -j^a. -fy points in the checklist. It was concluded the checklist should serve to identify the number of car/trailer parking spaces in a manner in which they can be easily entered and added up to a final total. Strommen will continue the editing to bring it to that point of usefulness. Shoulder width on streets to preclude a car door opening into traffic was discussed. It was concluded to leave the statement as is with the idea that it will encourage making adequate shoulders available for vehicle parking. Signage was discussed as to what type of signage is intended. Unilormity among all accesses is desired, as well as ease of making a change in the access lot plan or available streets. A laser-print quality plan plastic-laminated was suggested. Strommen suggested LMCD staff work with the cities and agencies to coordinate uniform signage at all accesses. SECURING SIGNED AGREEMENTS. It was proposed that agreements be presented initially to Hennepin County, Deephaven, Mound and Wayzata for possible completion by the fishing opener. Brandt advised six to eight weel.s is normal processing time for contracts to move through staff and county board reviews. Brandt asked for a copy of the final agreement at the earliert date. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned aX^8:J5 pm. EiJ ge^*K^^ t r o m me n Executive Director i LAKE LIHNETOHKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Lake Access Parking Agreement This Agreement is made between the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) and the ( both public corporations organized and existing under the (Laws ol' the State of Minnesota. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS the LMCD and <) are ^Jointly concerned with providing public icating access to Lake Minnetonka, meeting the Parking Standards for Lake Minnetonka, and WHEREAS the LMCD and <) recognize that a goal of 700 car/trailer spaces will be provided in the vicinity of present and future access sites around the lake on as equitable a basis as possible. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the LMCD and ( ) that the conditions for car/trailer parking for the public access identified on the checklist identified as Exhibit "A’ and Parking Site Plan identified as Exhibit "B"meet Parxing Standards on the checklist as indicated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LMCD and < have caused this agreement to be duly executed this day of . 19_. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT:AGENCY/CITY: - i 1 L EXHIBIT A Checklist for Evaluating Lake Minnetonka Public Access Car/Trailer Parking Agreements 1. 2. 3. Access Name Access City Lake Zone No. Car/Trailer (C/T) Parking by Location: a. Gff-street, on access site . . . . . . . . . . . (On-site designated trailer parking cn grass is acceptable if vehicle is pax-ked on graded or paved surface.) Off-street, remote from access site . . . . * Distance in feet from access site _ _ _ _ On-street, less than 1,500 feet: # of spaces b. c. d. 4. Designated signed C/T only, count 100% of C/T parking spaces available . • Not signed, count 75% of spaces available On-street, 1,501 feet to 2,000 feet: • Designated signed C/T only, count 100% of C/T parking spaces available . * Not signed, count 75% of spaces available Vehicle Only Parking Spaces - these count up to 10% of total number of C/T spaces on lot: # of standard vehicles spaces 9' x # of handicapped vehicle spaces 12' x Total # of vehicle only spaces . . . Count total vehicle only spaces or 10% of 19' 19' tot<cl C/T parking spaces in lots whichever is[. Igsp. 5. Total, car/trailer parking spaces at si'e s s = s n COOPERATING PROVISIONS: 1.Access site plan illustrating each C/T space with adequate ingress, egress, and maneuvering space is kept on file and current with LMCD. Initial as accepted: 2.*gnage provided at access site is clear, aesthetically attractive, consolidated for easy updating . 3.All spaces are available on unrestricted, first- come, first-served basis, from Memorial Day to Labor Day, 5:00 pm Friday until midnight Sunday. Fifty percent (50%) of spaces meeting Parking Standards are available weekdays. 4.All on-street parking spaces meet the following standards: a. Minimum length of 50 feet per space b. Adequate shoulder width to preclude door opening into traffic lane. b. 6. 7. 8. Page 2 Checklist for Evaluating Lake Minnetonka Public Access Car/Trailer Parking Agreement c.Safe pedestrian route to access point provided. d.On-street car/trailer parking spaces are illustrated and kept current on a plan by street name on file with the LMCD. A temporary boat mooring facility is provided a't the ramp site for a number of boats equal to 10% of the C/T parking spaces at the site for C/T parking spaces between 1.501 feet and 2,000 feet. Agency/wity reserves the right to make changes in access site plan off-street parking or on-street designated or non-designated parking as public policy priorities may require, with a good faith effort to replace lost C/T spaces at the earliest possible date, notifying the LMCD of anticipated changes. City retains approval privilege on any actions of an agency regulating parking allowances or restrictions on county or state highways affecting C/T parking in the vicinity of an access site. Agency/city agrees to enter into this agreement for a period of _ _ _ _ years (five years desired) in recognition of the valuable recreationalXII A y w ^ w •• — - — opportunities offered on Lake Minnetonka. 1/29/93 Amended LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE AGENDA 7:30 AM Saturday, February 13, 19S3 Norwest Bank Bldg, 900 E Wayzata Blvd, Rm 13'J (Elevator handicapped access west entrance, Wayzata Blvd) 1. First reading of draft ordinance prohibiting non-encased molded polystyrene foam in floating structures 2. Second reading of draft ordinance amending Sect. 2.05, Subd. 8 Facilities with Special Density License/Not Constructed 3. Second reading of draft ordinance changing "3 feet" to "4 feet from the 929.4' OHW" amending Sect. 1.07 Subd. 3 Length Variances and Sect. 2.01, Subd. 2, a) Authorized Dock Use Area; 4. Multiple Dock Licenses: per staff reports A. Renewals without change. Village Certificates returned Renewals with minor changes, no inciease in BSU or slip sizes RDP Partners Special Density License, Spring Park Bay, Spring Park; review of Order conditions under which license was granted and present status Forest Arms Improvement Association, Forest Lake, Orono; ^ application to back license five slips changed in 1987 from 32' to 24' long, to regain 32' length E. Lakeside Marina, Maxwell Bay, Orono; public notice advertising unauthorized off-lake storage for in-out service 5. Unrestricted Watercraft Subcommittee-report of 2/4/93 meeting 6. Deicing Inspections- Verbal staff report 7. Carlson Real Estate Dredging Project; correspondence from City of Minnetrista - informational a. Additional business recommended by the committee B. C. D. 2/4/93 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT February 5, 1993 To:Wetc?'^ Structures Committee From; Rachel Thibault Subj: Forest Arms Improvement Assn. A letter received 11/24/92 from Lynn Adara, President of Forest Arms Improvement Association (Forest Arms) asked the District to consider allowing the association to pay back license fees to regain slip sizes. In 1987, slips #1-5 were reduced from 32' long to 24' long. The Forest Arms slips were measured in 1987 as follows; Slip 1 (1) 7' X 24', S’Ips 2-5 (4) 12' X 24', Slips 5-10 (5) 12' X 32', Slip 11 (1) 9 X 16, Slip 13 (1) 12‘ X 16' Slips 12 and 14 were not put in Forest Arms' fees were based on 22 WSU in 1988 and 1989. 1990, 1991 and 1992, the fees were based on 24 WSU. The 24 WSU are based on (5) 12' (5) 12' (4) 10' X 24' slips <? 2 WSU X 32' slips (? 2 WSU X 16' slips (? 1 WSU 10 10 4 WSU If slips 1“5 are changed back to 32', the WSU would not change. Staff has discussed allowing Forest Arms to regain the slip lengths with legal counsel. Lefevere raised no objections to allowing the applicant to regain slip lengths which had previously been licensed. This still recognizes that this a grandfathered license. Staff recommends the committee consider allowing Forest Arms to r»instat, the 10 ailpa 32' long. Stafi further recommends the four 16* Inside slips be retained per the original grandfathered site plan. Staff disagrees ““'' Adams statement as to the sice of the 16* slips #11-1*1. The sl.e of these slips per the grandfathered Il'iJ* they have been on the site plan since 1984 a slips. It is also noted that a 30' side setback is required where multiple docks are not adjacent to another multiple dock. Adams letter received 11/24/92 is enclosed. RECEIVhDFEB 41993 xan.L^HESIDE MfiRim. inc.QUARANTEED LOWEST SLlP^^arSTORACrRaTES-20'$1295 24'$1560 30'$2700(Rates include inside winter storage) A .»\ »s N ' I N INCLUDED AT NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE: Pump-Out Facility • Use of Canoes and New Yamaha 650 Wave Runner • Electricity & Water • Vacuum Cleaner • Battery Jumps • Trailer Storage • Boat Launch • 24 Hour Security with Locked Gate • Ample Parking • Spring Power Wash • Full Time Dock Attendants • Guaranteed 24 Hour Service Response and Analysis • Do-It-Yourself Boat Yard • 25% Discount on Accessories • Guaranteed Lowest Price on 90+ Octane Gas • 24 Hour Accessible Restrooms • Picnic & Bar-B-Que Beach Area • Spring Open hlouse & Fall Customer Appreciation Picnic • Boat Handling Instruction • Boat Surveys • Special Rates on Pontoon & Party Boats ♦ N. ♦ BOAT HOUSES NOW AVAILABLE TO LAKESIDE SLIP CUSTOMERS 3 • • •n :> Jh X •~0 Ia PURCHASE 20' — $995 + $250 (Set-Up ^ Storage) 26' ~ $1200 + $250 (Set-Up & Storage) 30' — $1450 + $250 (Set-Up & Storage) 38* — $2995 + $300 (Set-Up & Storage) LEASE 20' — $300/Yr. ♦ $250 (Set-Up & Storage) 26' — $400A'r. + $250 (Set-Up & Storage) 30' — $450A'r. + $250 (Set-Up & Storage) 38' — $1000A'r + $300 (Set-Up ^ Storage) Includes columns, bows. ribs, vinyl cover & all mounting hardware DRY/YARD STORAGE; SUMMER ONLY ^ 4 Laurtch A ParX (Unlimrted In & Out)................................. $249 {Show Speaal -$199^ * lt> - 24 [Boats (ftamp Use. Customer Launch)............. $M9 (Show Special - $499) ♦ 16' - 24 Boats (In & Out Service. l^keskJe Launch)..... $649 (Show StHK:ial ~ $799) Wmt WINTER STORAGE $499 (Show Spix;ial - $399) $749 (Show Special - $699) $1019 (Show Special - $999) K ♦ Monttily Dry Storago - S3.50/Ft per Mo ♦ C'a'ly or Overnight Docking — .80/Ft. per Day PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWBuildingSGL FAMILY-NEW 2 ■ft.790.00 346.000.00 1.163.51 1 1.427.00 225,000.00 927 55SF-AOD/REMOOEL 7 .:,747.00 241,385.00 1.059.50 11 3,040.00 4x1,700.00 1.916 22SF-ACC STRUCTURE 1 17.00 600.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 00 0 00DEMO/PRINCIPAL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 W a W V 0 00INST-ACC STRUCT 1 330.00 37.000.00 214.50 0 0.00 0.00 \0 0 \0 0.00Sub-tot al 11*3.884.00*624.985.00*2.437.51'13*4,517.00*736,700.00*2,843.77*MechanicalHEATING SYSTEMS 7 733.00 o.no 0 00 8 405.00 11 00 0 00AIR CONDITIONING 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 45.00 3.00 0 00WOOD STOVE/FLUE 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 1.00 0 00FIREPLACE00.00 0.00 0.00 3 90.00 1.00 0 00VENTILATION00.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0 00GAS LINE INSPECT 1 30.00 0.00 o.OO 3 90.00 0.00 0 00O'JCT WORK ONLY 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0 00Sub-total 9*793.00*0.00*0.00*18*720.00*16.00*0.00*PlumbingFIXTURES 8 269.50 0.00 0.00 9 608.00 0.00 0 00WATER METER 0 0,00 0.00 0.00 1 133.00 0.00 0.00Sub-tot al 8"269.50*0.00*0.00*10*741.00*0.00*0.00* Sewer & Water WATER CONNECTION e 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00SEWER DISCONNECT 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00Sub-total o»0.00*0.00*0.00*2*60.00*0.00*n.oo* Sign PERMANENT/POSTED 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 200.00 M L. 00Sub-total 0*0.00*0.00*0.00*!•30.00*200.00*P 0 00* User Defined LAND ALTERATION 1 75.00 0.00 0 00 1 50.00 200,i ■'0.00 0. )0TREE REMOVAL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 u.oo o.noSub-total !•75.00*0.00*0.00*2*80.00*200,0 T.OO*o.no* Grand-total 29»*5.021.50**624.985.00**2.437.51**46**6,148.00**936.916.00**2.843.*7* 01/01/92 - 01/31/92BASE FEE1.427.003.040.00 0.0050.00 VALUATION325.000.00 411.700.00 0.00 0.00w. uu 4,517 00*0.00 736,700.00*405.0045.0030.0090.0030.0090.0030.00 720.00*11.003.001.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.0016.00*608.00133.00 u. 00741.00*D. 00 0.00*30.00 30.00 60.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 30.00 30.00*200.00 200.00* 50.00 30.00 •0.00* 200.> 10.00 U.OO 200.0 1.00* .14I.00**936.916.00*4 SEWER CONNECTION MAIL INPERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDREPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 02/02/93 JANUARY 1993BUILDING3.884.002,437.51312.690.00700.00 0.00 0.00225.007.559.20 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 02/02/93 BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT SEWER CONNECTION MAIL IN PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL 5.021.50 2.437.51 321.19 0.00 700.00 30.00 0.00 225 00 12.00 1,747.20 MECHANICAL793.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 0.0030.000.004.50832.00 •• PERMIT FEE REPORT »•**» CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/93 TO 01/31/93PLUMBING SEWER & WATER PAGE; 17 REQUESTER: LIN269.500.004.000.000.000.000.007.50281.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 USER75.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 SIGN0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 FIRE0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 •• PERMIT FEE REPORT »• CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/93 TO 01/31/93 PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN u. i 136023002630149010736303305270040514554450TUE. FEB 2, 1993. 10:17 AMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 1993 PERMU WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUEDNORTH ARM DR6TH AVE NWEST LAFAYETTE RDLONG LAKE BLVDTONKAWA ROPARK LACASCO CIRKELLEY PKWYHIGHWOOO ROF'RNDALE RD NFOREST LAKE LANDING PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY93/01/2993/01/1193/01/0793/01/1493/01/2593/01/1293/01/2793/01/2093/01/2293/01/1493/01/19 OR-004825OR-004898OR-004886OR-004904OR-004908OR-004901OR-CiJ49l2OR-0049C2OR-004909OR-004903OR-004906 15595200OOOOOUOO147539180000000000000000155300200000000018355119147183901479366900000000 OWNER LAST NMF E C CONSTRUCTIONNABRUCE BREN HOMESNANAAMRC INC NAJ A F CONSTRUCTION ROELOF'S CONSTRUCTION INC RICH JOHNSON HOMES INC NA JOHNSONO’ROURKELOWEANDERSONMARTINWROBLEWSKINELSONVCNGRIESDAHLBERGWOLFFPROSPECT AVE SUGARWOOD DR FOX ST FOX STWILDHURST TR BOHNS PT RD NORTH ARM DR FRENCH CREEK DR OLD BEACH RD 93/01/0593/01/2693/01/2893/01/2893/01/0593/01/0493/01/2893/01/0693/01/19 OROROROROROROROROR ■004896■004910004918004920004895004804004919004897004907 000000003446129934932477394142113472182639296767347273602474020234/18272 COUNTRYSIDE HTQ A COOLINGk“ve "SiS nc'™TRIPLE D FURNACEA-AARONSBAC HEATING INC NIELSENFIQGESTUBBSRAHNMCENANYMUELLERDUCKWORTHMOOARISSHADYWOOO RO 6TH AVE N CHEVY CHASE DR FOX ST fAQ|RNESS POINT Rl NORTH SHORE DR OLD BEACH RD EDGEWOOO HILLS RD 93/01/27 93/01/27 93/01/27 93/01/07 93/01/08 93/01/14 93/01/26 OR 93/01/29 OR OROROR OR OR OR 00491300491400491S 004899 004900 004905 004911 004922 293372002933720029337200 25911550 25354277 29337200 29723110 25445498 CULLIGANCULLIGAN CULLIGAN NORThKIDGE PLBG CO PLUMBING CULLIGAN BROWN LOREN PLBG JOHNSON DALE PLBG LITTLEHOWELL KING NOLAN POGUL ELFSTRANO MOOARIS SIMONSON WATERTOWN RD 93/01/28 OR-004916 14793216 SCHOENIHG JOHN BUTTERFIELD 01 Residence 24 Replacing Erlstlng02Addition25Lifting Principal Residence03Garage/Attached 26 Well Abandonment04Carage/Detached 27 Foundation C'lly OS A M Porch 28 Temporary Trailer06 ,jk .A Deck 29 Renovate/.-'-T* jdel07 Ml Fence 30 Accessory Structure08Gazebo31Stairway to Lake 0®Pool 32 Retaining Wall10Re-3ide 33 Entrance Monuments11Reproof34Tree Removal12Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accesaory Structure 18 Hove 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined WN. FEB NUMERICAL PERMIT NBAOR-004825 OR-004886 OR-004894 OR-004895 0R-00:S96 OR-004897 OR-004193 OR-004899 OR-0049D0 OR-004901 OR-004602 OR-004903 OR-004904 OR-004905 OR-004906 OR-004907 OR-0C4908 OR-004909 OR-004910 OR-004911 OR-004912 OR-004913 OR-004914 OR-004913 OR-004916 OR-004918 OR-0049.1.9 OR-004920 OR-004S22 29C ◄ WiN. fEB 8. 1993, 9;36 AMNUMERICAL LISTINQ JANUARY 199 3 )PERMIT MBR ISSUED CANCEL ADOR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM93/01/29 K 136093/01/07 N 263093/01/04 N 323093/01/05 N 113493/01/05 N 214093/01/06 N 128593/01/11 N 230093/01/07 N 154093/01/08 N 199193/01/12 N 63093/01/20 N 270093/01/14 N 45593/01/14 N 149093/01/14 N 436593/01/19 N 445093/01/J9 N 248093/01/25 N 107593/01/22 N 405193/01/26 N 200493/01/26 N 248093/01/27 N 330593/01/27 N isno93/01/27 N 154093/01/27 N 14293/01/28 N 392593/01/28 N 255593/01/28 N 126493/01/28 N 165593/01/29 N 1065 NORTH ARM DR 01 WEST LAFAYETTE RD 02 BOHNS PT RD 24 WILDHURST TR 02 PROSPECT AVE 01 FRENCH CREEK DR 29 6TH AVE N 01 FOX ST 28 EAGERNESS POTNT RD 29 PARK LA 10 KELLEY PKWY 20 FERNDALt RO H 29 LONG LAKE BLVD 02 NORTH SHORE DR 28 FOREST LAKE LANDING 29 OLD BEACH RO 28 TONKAWA RD 02 HIGHWOOO RO 24 SUOARWOOO OR 01 OLD BEACH RD 29 CASCO C1R 15 SHAOYWOOO RO 24 6TH AVE N 24 CHEVY CHASE DR 24 WATERTOWN RO 23 FOX ST 01 NORTH ARM DR 24 FOX ST 01 EDGEWOOO HILLS RO 28 15595200 14750918 39296767 34721826 00000000 24740202 00000000 25911550 25354277 15530020 18355119 14793669 00000000 20337200 OOOOOCOO 34718272 00000000 14718390 34461290 29723UO OOOOOCOO 20337200 293371 0 29337200 14793216 34932477 34727360 394142U 25445498 F E C CONSTRUCTION BRUCE BREN HOMES VOGT FRED .1 CO HELLANO HEATING & AIR COt«}NAA>AARONSNANORTHRIDGE PLBG CO TIMS QUALITY PLUMBING AMRC INCJ 6 F CONSTRUCTION RICH JOHNSON H0I4ES INCNACULLIGANNABAG HEATING INC NAROCLOF’S CONSTRUCTION INC COUNTRYSIDE HTQ A COOLINGBROWN LOREN PLBG NACULLIGAN CULLIGAN CULLIGAN SCIIOCNINQ JOHN HEATING A COOLING TWO TRIPLE D FURNACE KLEVC HTQ A AC JOHNSON DALE PLBG OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONJOHNSON176,000.00LOWE20,000.00MCENANY.00RAHN.00NIELSEN.00DUCKWORTH.00O’ROURKE 170.0CC.00NOLAN.00POGUE.00WR08LEWSK14,385.00 37.000.00OAHLBERG10,000.00ANDERSON55,000 DOELFSTRAKO.00WOLFF5,000.00HODARIS.00MARTIN145,000.00VONGRIES2,000.00riQQE.00MODARIS.00NELSON600.00LITTLE.00HOWELL.00KING.00BUTTERFIELO.00STUBBS.00MUELLER.00.00SIMONSON.00 < n>wi •irifi•Mill iMlli •Hill milliMll mill iMfli •■•ii mm rniTH rmiTi IMITI \ "" j :7 7 j^ t n *requester/lin*■*: PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/92 - 01/31/92BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW03205*0.00525.00200.00 0.00725.00*5«.0.000.000.000.000.00*725.00**1 0.000.000.000.000.00*o.oo**o.oo**REQUESTERt^UN ^1993 RECAP OF CONTRACT CPIESJanuary February March April Ji^e July August September October Novent)er December YTD TotalsSpring ParkPlan Review 0.00 0.00Inspections60.00 60.00Retainer25.00 25.00TOTAL85.00 85.00No. Plan Reviews 0 0No. Inspections 4 4Minnetonka BeachPlan Review 0.00 0.00Inspections75.00 75.00Retainer25. OU 25.00TOTAL100.00 100.00No. Plan Reviews 0 0No. Inspections 5 5185.00 185.M \ MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTICE OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING 5:30 P.M. Thursday, February 18, 1992 Burwell Room Minnetonka Community Center 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota Agenda: 1.District business. 2.Coordinator's position and joint powers agreemert with the City of Minnetonka. 3 .Preliminary steps to solicit statements of qualification for legal counsel. 4. 5. Committee organization. February Board meeting agenda. . e • ^ MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTICE OF FLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE MEETING 4:00 P.M. Thursday/ February 18, 1993 Burwell Room Community Center 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota AGENDA: 1. Status of Gleason Creek Improvement project. J 2. Preliminary discussion of findings and order for Gleason Creek. Improvement project. Phase II. % MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTICE OF COMPLAINTS AND VIOLATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING 4:00 P.M. Tuesday February 16, 1993 1 Eurwell Room Community Center 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota AGENDA: 1. District permit format Enforcement process2. ^1^ I III CABLEVBION 1504 2nd St. S.E.. P.O. Box 110, Waseca. MN 56093 L 507/835-5975 FAX 507-035-4567 February 10, 1993 FEB 18 1993 City Clerk City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear City Clerk; We are approaching a sun outage period which will cause loss of satellite signal. Sun outages are a normal part of satellite operation and occur every year in the spring and fall. Outages occur when the orbital positions of the earth, satellite dish earth stations, and the sun are aligned. Normally, earth stations receive transmissions only from satellites beaming cable signals to us. During periods of strong solar flares, the solar waves overpower the satellite signal, and earth stations pick up both transmissions. This usually results in noisy outages called "sun outages." There is nothing that can be done to prevent these outages. The upcoming sun outage period will begxn Saturday, February 27 and will end Saturday, March 13. The outages will lest less than 20 minutes a day. They should occur sometime between 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 2il5 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. If you have any questions, please call us at 1-800-332-0245. Sincerely, TRIAX CABLEVISION rRIAK CABLEVISION 1504 2nd St. S.E.. P.O. Box 110. Waseca. MN 56093 507/835-5975 FAX 507-835-4567 FE[! February 17, 1993 IB 1993 City Clerk City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear City Clerk: In the past, Triax Cablevision has used many door-to-door efforts in the Lake Minnetonka area. We've now designed a to lessen the number of door-to-door crews we send through the area by replacing them with a flyer that your local non-profit organizations can raise money delivering. Between the months of March and April, these groups will simply place the flyer in a secure place at the doorway, and proceed to the next home. This method is very quick, clean and very effective. If you ‘ ’ive any questions regarding this promotional campai^ please don’t hesitate to call me at 1-800-332-0245. Sincerely, Mark A ndrew CH.MR •X. • . « .f. » PHONE ei2/3-*d'3060 FAX 612/34A A70I TDD BI2/3‘4A*770ft BOARD OF H ennepin County Commissioners A 2400 Government C enter , ^' Minneapolis . Minnesota 55457-0240 February 16, 1993 FE3 1 ^ The Honorable Edward Callahan, Jr. M^or of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Callahan: 1975 in establishing Biock Grant Program, we've usM to ouroincc IV/3 we ve quamieQ lor inure uuui nmuyii m lunyj iirmrovc our housing stock and neighborhood facilities, expand public services and strengthen in^structure. Its a record we can be proud of. In 1994 we will begin a new three year CDBG funding period. To qualify, a new cooperation agreement between the County and all participating communities must be completed ^.d signed by October 1, 1993. This presents us with an excellent oppprtunity to si^k of the program and explore how we can improve its performance and effectiveness tor the 1994-96 penod. In the near future, the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development, wWch administers the CDBG program on behalf of the County, will be framing some issues and mviUng municipal officials to discuss the program’s future. Virile OPD staff will be malang suggestons for ways to improve effectiveness and reduce administrative costs, ideas of municipial professionals also ne^ to be brought forward. The purpose of this dialogue is not to "reinvent" local government cooperation of "I**" that isn’t broken. Our CDBG program serves our communiUes and residen^ well, it s DeCT characterized by good planning, strong local participation and responsible .idminisirauon. There are, however, clear opportunities to strengthen performance and leverage greater results and we mustn't let past success stand in the way of future improvements. In this SI irit of building on success, we hope to forge a consensus not just tor program extension, but for tangible ways oT using CDBG funds to better serve the residents and taxpayers of the cities and me County. I'd ask for your city’s support and participauon in this dialogue and look forward to a continuing community development partnership. Mar': Andrew, Chairman c: Ronald Moorse Board of Hennepin County Commissioners PRINTf O ON RIC'YC LID fAftE