Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-08-1993 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ROLL Th® Counci I mot on th® above date with the foi lowing members present: Mayor C.illahan, CounciImembers Charles Kelley, J. Oiann Goetten, and Gabriel Jabbour. JoEllen Hurr was absent. The following represented the City staff: City AdmlnIstrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Admini strator Jeanne Mabusth, Sr^iptlc Manager Stephen Weckman, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City ngineer Glenn Cook, Police Chief Stephen Sul I Ivan and City Recorder Terl Naab. Ed Cohen was present to represent the Planning Commission. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. (i1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten added Item #20. Jabbour added Items #11 and 12. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motions for all I terns adopted by consent agenda will be included in the minutes In their respective numericai order. (*»2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on January 25, 1993. Ayes 4 nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Kelley asked if the Commission is still working on the bike tral . Gerhardson noted they are and Hennepin County has approved a contract, which the City Attorney will bo reviewing, and then a report will be made to the Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS There Mere no comments. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT(#3) t1768/#1786 WILLIAM & RHONDA OMLIE,1860 SHADYWOOD ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE Holland Toenges and Ken Larson were present to represent the appI I cants. Mabusth reviewed that the applicants seek approval of a hardcover variance In the 75-250* zone, and a conditional use permit for land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. The application has been amended by reducing hardcover in the 75-250’ zone from 30.7X to 28.IX, no additional proposed hardcover In the 250-500’ zone, and a reduction to 250-300 cubic yards of fill. Toenges reviewed the events leading to the request of the applicants. He noted they originally had worked with an Incorrect survey which lead to Incorrect assumptions about the allowed hardcover. Structural problems with the house forced the project ahead. Larson reviewed the proposal and noted the patio area proposed formerly was a hardcovered area and does not Inc-ease hardcover. Jabbour stated the area where the patio is proposed was considered non-structural hardcover, and was never approved by the City. Mabusth noted the structure did meet all setbacks and did not exceed allowed hardcover standards. Jabbour asked how the proposed drive Is safer than the one approved with the building permit. Larson indicated the proposed drive allows for forward access onto a County Road. He noted his cllents wish to create an aesthetically pleasant entryway. Jabbour felt the original driveway design is safer and he felt the entire reason for the proposed drive is exclusively aesthetics. Larson noted the proposal reduces the slope from the edge of the drive from approximately 4’ to a very small drop to the retaining wal1 area. Goetten felt the turnaround would be safer and easier to use. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILES #1768/#1786 - CONT. Mayor Callahan understood there Is a large volume of traffic on the property. Toenges clarified that the appiicants do entertain frequentiy and Dr. 0mlie must have easy access from the property in the case of an emergency. Jabbour felt the Island may create more of a hardship in maneuvering the driveway. Kelley stated this is a classic example of overbuilding on a lot. He noted they proposed five garages, and suggested that one be eliminated. He said planning for this property should have been done prior to application for the permit. Jabbour noted It is up to the appiicants to demonstrate a hardship for the granting of the variance. He felt the applicants created the hardship. Toenges stated the hardship has always existed with the access onto the County Road. Mayor Callahan suggested the family is too large for the lot Larson indicated a portion of the ha'^dcover percentage is landscape areas underlain with fabric. He added, the retaining wall and slopage benefits the tower area and the lake by slowing erosion. Mabusth noted staff issued the building permit and later realized the need for steps which had not been included, which increased the approved hardcover by .2%. Goetten stated the applicants have made a good faith effort to reduce their proposal. She reiterated a turnaround drive is safer for access. She noted there is no Increase In the 250-500’ hardcover. She inquired whether the fabric under the landscape areas could be removed. Larson stated that could be eliminated which would reduce the hardcover by approximately 250 s.f. Jabbour reiterated his approval of the original driveway design approved with the building permit, and felt, if the application is approved as proposed, would set a negative precedent. Ke felt the project is 100X aesthetic and OX safety. MiTt Mil* Mill* riTrTt Mvr-i* MiI«f-l*H« r;lil*rrnprTiOTiMZWiiJ M¥n«VX::l* [•1C:1* r#i:: F.lil*•nn Mill* •liflK# MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 ZONING FILES #1778/#1779 - CONT. 2. The applicants want a guarantee that If In the future there are changes In zoning or land use applicable to tnis property, the special lot combination agreement would remain In force. Moorse stated language can be drafted acceptable to both the applicants and the City. Jabbour felt the Goettens should be allowed use of the riparian out lot as lo>?g as al I subject property is held in common ownership. He felt it would be unreasonable for the City to force the Goettens to sell the vacant lot so a residence could be built and the outlot used. Mayor Callahan inqui'*ed as to the normal policy on this Issue. Mabusth stated the common ownership of the lots makes the request reasonabIe. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to direct staff to redraft the appropriate resolution and special lot comb InatIon for AppI I cations #1778 & #1779 for Andrew Goetten, 1385 Fox Street, clarifying the riparian rights issue and guaranteeing future rights of the property, subject to the City Attorney’s review and approval. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#5) #1787 ROBERT L. WAADE, 996 WILDHURST TRAIL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3228 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Waade were present. Mabusth explained this Is a request for a conditional use permit for a non-rental guest apartment. The Planning Commission was concerned that access to the apartment did not meet the standard for access, which must be through the principal structure. The applicants, at that meeting, agreed to relocate a wall making the entrance within the principal structure. She felt the Planning Commission was also concerned with the size and the kitchen within the apartment. She noted the Planning Commission recommended a condition to limit approval to the current owner, requiring any future owner to appear before the Council for approval to continue use or remove the kitchen area. Mr. Waade noted he has built many homes with this type of apartment and has never been asked to limit approval to current owners. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993ZONING FILE #1787 - CONT.Goetten indicated the City has stipulation.never requested this type of Cohen reiterated the Planning Commission’s concern with the size and kitchen area of the apartment. He felt this would be an ideal rental situation because of the access. Mrs. Waade noted access to the apartment is through the only back doorway to the house. Mabusth said an approval resolution would be filed in the chain of title Indicating conditions of approval. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution 3228 for Application #1787 for Robert L. Waade, 998 Wildhurst Trail, for a conditional use permit for the construction within the principle residence of a non-rental guest apartment. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#6) #1789 LIBBIE HOPWOOD, 1205 LAKEVIEW AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3229 Britt Goetze, Jr. was present. Mabusth reviewed the original structure was destroyed by a fire, and the applicant seeks an area and setback variances to rebuild within the same building envelope. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution #3229 for Application #1789, Libbie Hopwood, 1205 Lakeview Avenue, for area and setback variances to construct a new residence. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#7) #1790 MINNETONKA CENTER FOR THE ARTS, 2040 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3230 Mr. Martinson was present. Mabusth stated the applicant seeks a variance because a sign Is considered an accessory structure, and the code requires any signage on a property to support the principal use of the property. The direction sign Is to be placed on a residential property. The code does not allow for directional signs. She noted the County has approved the location. 0 F;VZ# rtHi^ •Ml r»iiW* r#iM« •iif«i«i» WiiliiW ;lilt Mil* '^'•V rsw^i* Mil*• ^il* ^■*iH«Fl*l*I*J MiI*Dl*H*J MiH* Mils* MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993ZONING FILE t1792 - CONT.Mabusth explained due to the newly adoptedthe building envelope encroaches the lakeshore protected area. The fironbara suaaested that If the dam were removed, the setback wouia b^m^!^%he"lndfc^^ unlikely the dam wl I 1 ever be removed. She noted the deck Is proposed at 25’ from the * for the principal structure. The footprint of the house Is 3,.00 s.f., which Is well above the average In the nelghborho a. Mayor Callahan asked If It wore possible to locate the house on the lot meeting the lakeshore setback. Gronberg noted other properties along Loaf Street have provided the 33’ right-of-way, thus making those homes 8 further back on the property than this one will be. He stated the house Is 2,200 s.f. plus the garage and dock areas. He noted the setbacks of other houses along the creek. He added the DNR’s recommendation was a 50 setback. Jaboour noted the DNR recommended a 50’ setback for the entire lake area, but Orono felt a 75’ setback was more beneficial. Goetten Inquired how much further back the house would have to be to meet the setback. Jabbour stated this area Is zoned 2 acre minimum to accornmodate septic requirements, but since sewer is provided, he felt It would be bettor to reduce the side lot lino, and maintain the required lakeshore setback. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to Application #1792 for Don Gronberg, 110 Leaf Street, to allow the applicant time to reconsider his proposal. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#10) #1795 LUANN WALTERS, 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LuAnn Walters, Cliff Otten and Doug Otten were present. 8 ! • 1 • 1 ■V------------------------- {•\7ltU fL«r=v*] rti ■ • •M«lt r»icat •riHiii* r*iiV;vt f2^9Ti] al«1ar«];1al« tliCa] •lifalal*WrMa]r.i*L*ralPI^*liI« Mil* •^.itla ralTfiTtMt •T-T*l« COUNCIL MEETING 1993es a day care center with panded the i^roposal to 70 persons allowed will be use and the limitations of s recommended traffic flow he applicant wai concerned 19 spaces, with no drop off to the property further to County does not want to d along the rlght-of- wlll be monitored through provided for 13 parking r a day care. He felt this ginal use. lis zone. tuatlon and he could not d the welfare reasons. He care. I will work. He noted the Id the parking as proposed child, and they propose a 3ol situation that they staggered throughout the >unty cannot approve the Jt the area will at I I I be -3 minutes per parent to He suggested additional not Just drop off their >e to discuss the day or r would be the maximum many people there at one MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993ZONING FILE #1795 - CONT.Mabusth stated the County Is reviewing the speed In the area to determine If it needs to be reduced. Kelley asked if they would have a latch key program with buses dropping off children. Walters stated if that were available, she would want the bus to drop off the children on County Road 6, with staff available to greet the children. Mayor Callahan clarified that there will probably be 3-4 traffic movements on the property during the day. Walters stated there actually would be more like 6-8 patterns. She said she hopes to have the same cmount of children In each program to eliminate congestion. mayor Callahan stated it seems like there will be a constant pattern of traffic, avoiding concentration. He asked If the children would be allowed to play outside. Walters explained they plan a fenced play area off the back door. She felt the woods on the property would provide a wonderful area for exploring. Screening would be provided from Highway 12 for the play area. Otten noted the need for an alternate septic site would determine If there is room for expansion of the play area. Kelley asked if the building will be sprinkled. Mabusth reported at the point of 29 students and/or teachers, the Fire Code requires the building to be sprinkled. Otten noted that provision is being incorporated with the renovation of the building. Jabbour askeJ if there Is an acceptable number of persons for the appI I cant. Otten noted the plan proposed is from a 1980 site plan. He said no one In the past has put the kind of money necessary into the property to improve it, but to do so, one must use It to its capacity. Ho stated there are some unknown costs associated with the project, and therefore It is difficult to determine the minimum number of people that would be acceptable. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993ZONING FILE #1795 - CONT.Goetten stated she would love to haN e the property utilized. She cautioned that the City needs to proctid carefully. She asked that the Council be better informed about safety Issues and aiternatIves. Otten stated they have met or exceeded the requirements. He asked that Council give them direction. Kelley asked that comparative studies be done and presented. He suggested that a separate employee parking area De provided, away from the building. He asked that the play area be moved or screened very well from Highway 12. He asked that lighting be addressed, and questioned the size of the entry to the property. Jabbour suggested the City not be Involved In areas monitored by the State. Mabusth asked their opinion on the catering service. She noted a kitchen is necessary to provide meals for the children, and the catering service Is a new pattern In day cares, providing families a convenience. Walters explained the time after the children are picked up from the day care is very crucial for faml I les, and providing dinner may help to ease that situation. She noted they do not intend to collect money at the door but would provide for alternate methods of payment. Jabbour stated If the catering is not a function of the day care, the Council may not be permitted tc approve the use. Otten stated the catering service would be the first thing eliminated If found that it was taxing the septic, system. Walters requested that Council act on the request to enable her to seek approval from the other necessary agencies. Mayor Ca11ahan announced that if the Counci I is satisfied about the safety features, the concept seems agreeable. Kelley agreed, but added he may not approve that many people. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table Application #1795 LuAnn Waiters, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard, to allow the applicant additional time to supply the additional information relating to the Issues raised. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993ZONING FILE #1795 - CONT.Mayor Callahan suggested the applicant direct the safety concerns of the City Engineer.A) Mayor Callahan movv.d Item #17 to this section of the meeting andsuggested the City reactivate the Lake Use Committee to officially represent the City In working with the DNR in the development of the plans for the Maxwell Lay access. He recommended Goetten be nominated as Chair, Kelley as Vice Chair, and nominated the following Planning Commission members: Schroeder, Bellows and Rowlette to the Committee contingent upon their approval to serve on the Committee. B) Mayor Callahan expressed the Council’s best wishes to Linda Walters, of the City staff, who Is In the hospital under going major surgery. C) Mayor Callahan referred to a request by Janet Haugen to support her seeking a pos111 on with the Me t ropoIit an CouncI I. Goetten noted Hurr Is considering the position also. D) Jabbour referred to an art IcIe pub I I shed In the Weekly newspaper In which they quoted Hurr at a LMCD meeting as stating a desire to serve the remainder of her term as LMCD representative of the City. He said he discussed the Issue with Hurr who Indicated she wishes to attend the meetings to protect Orono’s Interest, but Is supportive of the Council’s decision with regard to the LMCD. E) Jabbour asked the City to consider estabIishIrg a program to inspect sump pumps in the City to ensure they are net dumping Into the sewer system. Gerhardson said staff has already started to discuss this pregram. ENGINEER’S REPORT (Sill) PAY REQUEST #4 HIGHWAY 12 WATER TOWER It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize Pay request #4 to be paid to PDM, Inc., in the amount of $94,767.25. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*i12) PAY REQUEST #5 STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize Pay Request #5, Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer, to be paid to Progressive Contractors, Inc., In the amount of $90,600.17. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 (#13) HIGHWAY 12 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS UPDATE Cook reported there are three issues: the safety Issue, upgrade to WiI low Drive, and the temporary signal at WiI low Drive and Highway 12. He Indicated MnDot has said the safety Improvements are scheduled for 1995, which means the signal light will not be realized until then. He noted accidents during the three years prior to 1992 averaged six per year, with two of those Involving Injuries to passengers. In 1992 there were fourteen accidents. Mayor Callahan noted MnDot does not encourage the use of City funding to install the signal. Qerhardson said the City of Long Lake was willing to help fund the temporary signal, but may not be In a financial position to do so at this time. The State has determined a need for the signal, and have approved conceptual plans including the signal and turn lanes. Kelley asked at what point the City could close Willow Drive. Gerhardson stated the north and south frontage roads would need to be In place prior to that closing. Kelley suggested prohibiting crossing of lanes on Highway 12. Cook stated that would be difficult to accomplish. Mayor Callahan directed staff suggest ions. return with alternative Cook noted a pathway along Willow Drive Is proposed by the City, therefore, it Is recommended to reduce the right-of-way acquisition needed, an urban section be constructed the entire length of the roadway. This would reduce the total width of the roadway and would better maintain existing vegetation and trees. Mayor Callahan asked If they are ready to proceed with this improvement. Gerhardson noted the feasibility study is complete with the exception of the urban section costs. Kelley asked why willow Drive is proposed to be upgraded. Gerhardson stated Willow Drive is a MSA road, and improvements are needed due to the anticipated development along the roadway and the fact the road Is not built for 9 ton trucks. Ho noted there is enough MSA funds to do the bike path along Old Crystal Bay Road and the other projects on the list. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 HIGHWAY 12 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS UPDATE ~ CONT. Mayor Callahan suggested staff present a proposal at the next meet Ing. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#14) CABLE COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - ADDITION TO RESOLUTION #3227 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to appoint Hurr to the Cable Commission for 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to appoint Tim Pattrin to the Cable Commission for 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#16) TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY - RESOLUTION #3232 It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3232 authorizing tax forfeited land released for private sale to adjacent owners. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#16) CITY FACILITIES CHANGE ORDERS Moorse reviewed the three change orders listed in the memo. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to approve the change orders as presented in the memo dated February 2, 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. Moorse referred to the budget update included, which indicates a reduced contingency fund due to the amount paid for SAC charges. Jabbour said during the process, he was Informed that a generator connected to natural gas was not feasible as funding from Emergency Preparedness could not be used then. He noted a generator was installed using natural gas. Gerhardson said the City was granted a variance from the State Electrical Board. Moorse noted the generator meets the needs of the Pol Ice Department for their emergency operations center. Sullivan noted he is unaware of any funding available through Emergency Preparedness to pay for the generator. Jabbour said when he makes a decision it is usually based on staff Input and reiterated the necessity for that Information to be correct. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 (#17) LAKE USE COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - MAXWELL BAY ACCESS OVERSITE This item was discussed under the Mayor/CouncM report. (#18) JOINT DEFENSE OF THE LAWSUIT BROUGHT AGAINST THE MPRS 4 ITS MEMBER CITIES - RESOLUTION #3233 Moorse reported this issue Involves two discrimination lawsuits fI led against the MPRS. Holmes & Graven will be providing the Joint defense. This firm has been active with the MPRS since Its I nception. Kelley asked If the City Is taking the position of the joint powers organ IzatIon by authorizing payment of the defense. Moorse said the City is taking the same position as the joint powers organization. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution #3233 authorizing Holmes & Graven to represent the City of Orono In lawsuits commenced by John Starks and Christopher Fields. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#19) VOICE 4 DATA CABLING CONTRACT PAYMENT #2 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to authorize the City to pay $6,587.00 for voice and data cabling. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*•20) DESIGNATION OF THE NEW CITY FACILITIES AS “SMOKE-FREE" - RESOLUTION #3234 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3234 dec IarIng the new City faciI 111es to be smoke free buI IdIngs. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#21) OFFICr FURNITURE PAYMENT #1 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to authorize payment of $60,680.57 for office furniture. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#22) PAY REQUEST #2/FINAL - PUMP 4 METER SERVICE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to authorize Pay Request •2/finat to Pump and Meter Service for the installation of the hoist at the new Public Works facility In the amount of $5,545.53. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBR"ARY 8, 1993(♦23) STUBBS BAY SEWER FEESMoorse explained the Council agreed to allow residents iJP ^o fiveyears to connect to the sewer system If they / ^ 16an acceotable septic system. It was determined that after a 16month period, the City would charge an does not Include the M.W.C.C.’s portion of the sewer rate. Jabbour noted a portion of the sewer charge Is retained In a for future maintenance of the system. That Is the ^ charge which unconnected Stubbs Bay c 111 zens wl I I be pay. He felt this should be ®>'P'®' "®A th A th^ft^st t Imeresidents. He added, the letter should note this Is ^l'® the 16 month deadline for connection has been waived and the fee reduced. It was moved by Mayor Callahan^ seconded by Jabbour, to direct sJa^mmend the letter to Include t”® J''®* explanation of the charge, and to authorize the '®«®J be sent to the Stubbs Bay area property owners. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*♦24) SEASONAL WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS - RESOLUTION ♦3235 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution establishing the 1993 weight limits for City streets from March 15 through May 15, 1993. Aycc 4, nays 0. (*♦25) SALARY ADJUSTMENT OFFICER IRVING ENGLISH It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to Increase Officer rving Engtlsh’s salary from $18,397 per hour to $18,724 Per hour as of^February 11. 1993, as per the 1992 LELS contract currently In effect. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT There was no report. (*♦26) LICENSES It was moved by Goetten, following IIcenses: seconded by Jabbour, to approve the Annual Home Occupation License: Russell Norum, 3264 North Shore Drive Cigarette License: John Downey, Wayzata Country Club John O’Sullivan, O’Sullivans Don Scherven, Navarre Lanes Ayes 4, nays 0. 16 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 (««27) BILLS It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. OTHER Marge Gasch asked that Council give direction to her in her pursuit to preserve the Council Chambers. Mayor Callahan noted there are others interested In using the facility, and suggested all interested parties contact Moorse. He added, an article should be published in the newspape** allowing for ail citizens to express their Ideas on the issue. Mayor Callahan inquired about the police contract with Minnetonka Beach. Sullivan noted there Is no concern on the part of Minnetonka Beach to not continue the contract for 1993, but they have expressed a desire to have a meeting of all contract cities to discuss issues with regard to future contracts. He noted all contract cities have the same basic contract, which is very difficult to understand and difficult to determine actual cost. Kelley asked if they have a cost accounting system to Justify charges to contract cities. Sullivan noted they do but there are still problems in determining charges. It was determined that a Joint meeting of contractual cities would be benefIcIal. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adjourn the regular Orono City Council meeting at 11:23 p.m. Ayes 4, nays 0. Planning Ccrmissicn Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFOPuMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NA2-IE (please print)ADDRESS NA^IE OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) WiZiZf WITJf W5X#J »TtI«< Mill#] mfi«i SSIS i •> nA •TAl »J SnSi RBfl l•Hll MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEEI HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 ROLL '13 ^093 Ij’.l A 7, The Council met on the above date with the following iflMfbers present: Mayor Callahan, CouncIImembers Charles Kelley, JoEllen Hurr, and Gabriel Jabbour. J. DIann Goetten was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. Mayor Callahan recognized the Finance Department for the Certificate of Achievement for Financial Reporting. He commended them on the fine Job. Mayor Callahan referred to a letter he received from a citizen recognizing the fine service by Officer Curt Erickson the night of the Ice storm. He reported Erickson went out of his way to help the gentleman after his car had partially slid off the road. He commended him for the fine job. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA Hurr removed Items #2, 18 and 19. Jabbour removed Item #5. Mayor Callahan added Item #7. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be Included In the minutes In their respective nuf-^rlcal order. (#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Hurr asked that Page 2, 1st paragraph be corrected to read: "less likely to happen"; and Page 3 changed to read "J. DIann Goetten left the Council Chambers". It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on January 11, 1993. Ayes 3, nays 0. Jabbour abstained. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to approve the minutes of the special meeting of the Council held on January 4, 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS (#4) OROMO BASEBALL ASSOCIATION LEASE - BEDERWOOD PARK It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to table action on the OBA lease^of Bederwood Park until the February 22nd meet Ing. Hurr InQUI rod about the background of such. Mayor Cal lahan reviewed the history of the lease. He noted the Park Commission has supervised and annually reviewed the use of the park. Hurr said she supported the Park Commission’s recommendation and felt since the park has been Improved, It should continue to be used. Jabbour suggested she review the original contract. Vote; Ayes 4, nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Hurr reported the "Save the Lake Dinner" will be held February 11th. She stated the LMCD Is seeking Input from Orono regarding the use of polystyrene floating structures. The Environment Committee Is reviewing the Trunk Highway 101 Gray’s Bay bridge replacement issue. An Administrative Committee Is reviewing finances, staggering terms for Directors and alternating performance reviews. Mayor Callahan felt they may not have the Statutory authority to stagger terms of Directors. Jabbour said while the Council Is awaiting receipt of the City Attorney’s opinion regarding whether the City Is forced to continue financial support to the LMCD, the Council should consider the next steps. He reiterated they are not sending funding or a representative until that opinion Is received, and felt the entire issue should not bo voted on until a full Council Is present. (•4A) DNR MAXWELL BAY ACCESS PROPOSAL It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to continue discussion on the DNR Maxwell Bay access proposal to the January 26, 1993 work session beginning at 8:00 p.m. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 PUBLIC COMMENTS Don Germanson, President of the Lake Minnetonka Land Owners Association, thanked the Council for its continued effort in working toward a good relationship. He noted he was in favor of the staggered terms for the LMCD Board Directors because this wltl allow for a faster turnover in the coming years, and perhaps some changes on the Board. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#5) i1778/i1779 ANDREW GOETTEN, 1385 FOX STREET - REVISED VARIANCE & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - SPECIAL LOT COMBINATION It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to table Application #1778 & #1779 for Andrew Goetten of 1385 Fox Street, at the request of the applicant, for two weeks. Ayes 4, nays 0. (»0) LMCO PROPOSED FOAM FLOTATION ORDINANCE Gaffron reviewed the three changes from Orono’s adopted Ordinance to the LMCD proposed Ordinance: 1) extension of the elimination date to ApriI 15, 1995; 2) rearranged sections; and 3) discontinued use of flotation buoys by 1997. Kelley asked If this was initiated because of the ordinance Orono adopted. Hurr felt the LMCO would probably have done something, but It would have taken longer. Jabbour said the LMCD was reluctant to do anything regarding this issue at this time. Mayor Callahan indicated there appear to be no specific comments on this proposal to be related to the LMCO. (#•7) CITY OF VICTORIA FLEXIBILITY REQUEST It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to accept the shore I and fI ex IbI I Ity request of the CIty of Victoria. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*8) REVISED SUBMITTAL TO MET COUNCIL - COMPREHENSIVE PLAM AMENDMENT #3 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to accept the revised submittal on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3, and direct staff to submit to the Metropolitan Council. 4ves 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JANUARY 25, 1993(#9) APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION -MR. & MRS. BARRY O’ROURKE, 2300 SIXTH AVENUE NORTHMr. and Mrs. O’Rourke were present. Mabusth explained the adriiinIstrat! ve appea! to the staff pol icy was Initiated when the O’Rourkes were informed at the time of issuance of the building permit for their residence that the permit for the barn could not be issued until the property contained a principal res Idence. Mrs. O’Rourke added this is primarily an economic Issue and explained the cost of the residence and barn wi i i be greatiy reduced if they both can be done together during the winter months. She explained she raises valuable horses and has nc intention of leaving them unattended on the property. Moorse stated it was suggested a contract be signed by the owners agreeing to staggering construction. Mabusth noted the Building Inspector feels that would be impossible for the building staff to police the construction of both at the same time. Hurr stated she does not object since the building permit for the residence has been Issued. She said a signed contract should be submitted to the City. Kelley asked If the owners had any Intention to move the horses to the property prior to the house being completed. He asked where the horses are currently being boarded. Mrs. O’Rourke said she has no intention of moving the horses prior to the house compiotion and stated the horses are being boarded outside of Maple Plain. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to grant the appeal of administrative decision for Mr. and Mrs. Barry O’Rourke, 2300 Sixth Avenue North, subject to an agreeable contract signed by the owners of the property. Ayes 4, nays 0. Hurr suggested the owners pay the additional legal fees Incurred by the City in the reviewing of the contract. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 4) Mayor Callahan referred to the request for the Council to adopt a resolution declaring Voijntaers for America Week. Moors© noted that will be brought to the next meeting. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. B) Hurr Inquired about the policy on opening others mail. She asked that her mall be delivered unopened. She felt that citizens should be allowed to contact their representatives privately. C) Kelley questioned the renovation work being done at 3800 Wayzata BouIevard. Mabusth explained a permit was Issued to repair the roof, which sustained major damage. She noted the Council will be reviewing, In an upcoming meeting, a proposal for a day care center at the IocatI on. D) Jabbour asked If staff reviewed the burning permit policy. Mabusth reported that the policy has been changed. Jabbour felt the Council should consider a fee for such permits to compensate for staff time. E) Mayor Callahan noted that the City receives many Invitations to meetings being held. He suggested they adopt a policy directing Council to take official action as to whether or not someone representing the City should attend. ENGINEER’S REPORT There was no report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (ilO) 1993 APPOINTMENTS - RESOLUTION #3227 Moorse explained the Building and Zoning Administrator has determined the Building Code Board of Appeals Is required by Statute. All members have been contacted and expressed a desire to be reappointed. It was mcved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to appoint to the Bui I ding Code Board of Appeals the persons listed In Resolution •3227. Ayes 4, nays 0. Moorse reported Barb Peterson wishes to fulfill her term on the North Tonka Crime Coalition. No action is required as the term Is In place. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 1993 APPOINTMENTS - CONT. Mayor CaI Iahan asked that Moorse report on what the Coalition does, Moorse reported MnDot has asked that appointments be made to the Highway 12 Policy Committee to allow that Committee to review the Scoping Document. Mayor Callahan reported he understood the document Is at the printers and will be delivered In about 10 days. He understood MnDot would like appointments to all three committees for the purposes of reviewing the Scoping Document. MnDot may require new committees after that review. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to appoint those listed In ResolutIon #3227 to the CltIzens CommIttee, subject to their willingness to serve; to appoint Mayor Callahan as head of the Policy Committee, with Goetten as alternate along with Gerhardson; and to appoint to the Technical Committee, Jabbour and Kelley. Ayes nays 0. Mayor Ca I I ahan suggested Moorse make it a polIcy whenever possible, to attend all Committee meetings regarding Highway 12. Jabbour asked that the Council be provided with a calendar of upcoming meetings. (#11) CIGARETTE ORDINANCE REVIEW Moorse referred to Information reviewing past occurrences leading to the current ordinance. Mayor Callahan noted the Police Department recommends maintaining the ordinance as Is. Kelley felt this is an example of over regulation by the City. Hurr asked If the City wants to make a statement about smoking, why the Orono Golf Course sells cigarettes. She felt the liquor establishment should be allowed the use of the cigarette machine, but suggested It be moved to allow supervision. She stated she has no problem allowing the use of a cigarette machines In liquor estabI Ishments where the legal age is greater than or equal to that required to purchase cigarettes. Jabbour stated the change to the ordinance would only affect one establishment. He did not feel selling cigarettes from behind the counter Is that inconvenient. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 CIGARETTE ORDINANCE REVIEW - CONT. Mayof* Callahan directed staff to draft the appropriate ordinance amendtii*?nt for Council review. He asked that the Police Department express their views on the change at that meeting. (#12) FACILITIES CHANGE ORDERS Moorse reviewed the three change orders, presented In the memo. 1) Mechanical contract - decrease In amount; 2) Hoffer’s Inc. which the largest portion ic for a new door, to be paid by the masonry contractor as an error was made In the size of the opening; and 3) Jansco Caulking which the first portion is related to moisture getting through to the roof prior to the roof installation. The Architect and Construction Manager are reviewing to determine which contractor Is responsible. The second portion Is for the Public Works building, and which was overlooked in the bid process. Jabbour asked about the report on the Architect’s relmburseables and the kennel cost. Moorse explained he has a list of approximately 6 Items concerning In which the City is In dispute with the various subcontractors, totalling approximately $20,000, not including the relmburseables. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to approve the three change orders as presented. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#13) CITY HALL & PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS APPLICATION $ CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT #11 Moorse noted all requests are within the change orders or budget updates. Hurr asked if the construction manager has been paid In full. Moorse noted the last payment has been withheld because of unresolved Issues. He noted the architect has volunteered to pay the difference between the reimbursable amount and the overpayment. He suggested not settling for that amount, but rather review the relmburseables and overpayment and determine the amount of refund owed the City. Mayor Callahan asked when the Police Department will move !n. Moorse Indicated they plan to be in by February 11th. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT #11 - CONT. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to approve Certificate of Payment #11 for the City Hall and Public Works Buildings In the amount c>f $258,911.68, as presented. Ayes 4, nays 0. Moorse referred to the Information provided regarding the fuel system project. He noted Pump and Meter has reduced their cancellation cost to only expenses Incurred by them. He suggested the Council offer an amount less than what they propose. Jabbour noted he has been in contact with them, and up front, asked them not to hide the cancellation cost In the cost for the above ground tanks as Council desires lo be aware of all costs. He reported Pump and Meter has done Just that and said the Council should respect them for that. He said Pump and Meter did Incur some engineering costs and should be reimbursed for such. Mayor Callahan suggested Moorse try to negotiate a lower amount, but If that Is not possible, he did not object to paying the amount requested. Ho commended Moorse on his efforts to try and save the C1ty money. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to authorize staff to pay up to $2,182 for a cancellation foe to Pump and Meter In conjunction with the order for the above ground tanks. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•14) ESTABLISH DATE FOR 1993 BOARD OF REVIEW It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to establish the 1993 Board of Review for April 29, 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•15) GROUND WATER PLAN Moorse explained staff has reviewed Hennepin County Board of Commissioners' ground water plan. The following are areas of concern: 1) well head protection - the plan promotes rules and regulations currently enforced by the State of Minnesota; and 2) the plan cal Is for a County-wide joint powers, leaving Orono as one small voice among many. He added, the plan provides good information and suggested cities could be better served if the County would provide technical service and Information. Kelley suggested the Council write a letter to their Commissioner stating their opposition. He felt this is a clear example of over reguI at I on. a MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 GROUND WATER PLAN - CONT. Mayoi Callahan directed staff to prepare objections to the plan. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, directing staff to formally object to the plan In accordance with the schedule. Ayes 4, nays 0. Mayor Callahan felt It would be appropriate to Inform the City of Mlnnetonka of the action being taken and thank them for the update. Kelley noted the ground water problems are not Just In Hennepin County, but rather are State-wide. Mayor Callahan stated he would write a letter of objection to the County Commissioner. Gaffron noted the DNR Technical Committee, at its last meeting, was presented with Information on storm water management. Mayor Callahan felt It difficult keeping track of various groups all monitoring the same thing. (#16) CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN FINANCIAL REPORTING It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, congratulating Finance Director Tom Kuehn and the financial staff for the City’s obtaining the G.F.O.A. Certificate >f Achievement for Excellence In Financial Reporting for the 1991 Comprehensive Annual Finance Report; and acknowledges the valuable assistance provided by the audit staff of Malloy, KarnowskI, Radosevich and Company. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#17) EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE Moorse explained Excess Liability Insurance allows the City to exceed the State Statutory limit of $600,000 to $2,000,000 for all claims within those limits. Federal or Civil rights case would be outside those limits and therefore do not have any limit set. The Waiver of Liability Limits allows tht City to voluntarliy waive the Statutory Iimit of $600,000 for all cI a I ms up to $2,000,000. He explained If there were an accident Involving a City employee and several citizens, the $600,000 limit would be divided among all citizens Injured unless that limit is waived. Kelley asked the additional cost to waive the limits. 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE - CONT. Moorse Indicated It would cost the City an additional $8,492 to waive the limits, plus the additional $22,587 for the excess liability Insurance. Kelley clarified this amount does not Include the cost for the insurance up to the $600,000 limit. Kelley asked staff to provide an entire list of insurance policies carried by the City. Mayor Callahan suggested they wait to make a decision til ail Information Is provided. He asked that staff review the financial responsibility of the insurance companies that the City uses. Moorse clarified that the Council has adopted a resolution waiving the limits, this Is merely presented for Information. Jabbour suggested staff provide the Information and CouncII review for the upcoming year. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Mayor Callahan suggested they review the claim for reimbursement for 1580 Bohns Point Road. Moorse explained this Issue relates to two sewer backups at the property. After the first backup, the City proceeded to repair the Lift Station. However, a temporary pump did not hold and a second backup occurred at the residence. The property owner then Installed Items In the house to preve^’t It from happening again. The Insurance company will not pay the cost of these items. The City is asked to pay for the additional Items Installed at the res Idence. Jabbour referred to one Council member In the past who had similar problems and Installed Items such as Installed at this property, and the Council at the time choose not to pay any of the additional cost. Hurr felt the homeowner should be reimbursed for the additional cost. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to authorize staff to reimburse the property owner of 1580 Bohns Point Road for items Installed at his residence to eliminate future damage from sewer backups. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 ATTORNEY’S REPORT - CONT. Mayor Callahan referred to the Issue between the Jeromes and the LIndells, whose properties lie on either side of the fire lane on County Road 51. He refereoced their claim of sufrerlng from Illegal activities by snowmobi lefs and owners of ice houses using that fire lane. He said the Council must do their best to protect the citizens of Orono in their own homes, and discourage the Illegal activity reported. Jabbour noted the issue has come up several times in the past, and It was determined by Bruce Maikerson, City Attorney at the time, that the fire lane could not be vacated. (•18) LICENSES It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley, to approve the licenses, but to deny the cigarette license for Orono Golf Course. Hurr felt a City-owned facility should not sell cigarettes. Moorse Indicated the purpose of the current ordinance is to prevent minors from starting the habit. Gerhardson asked that Council table the license to allow staff time to review the impact. Hurr revised her motion to approve the following licenses, tabling the cigarette license for Orono Golf Course. Kelley seconded the mot Ion. Cigarette Licenses: LeRoy Koehnen, Navarre Amoco Richard Keaveny, Keaveny’s Navarre Drug Steven Corl, Navarre Liquor’s Inc. James G. Holtz, Jimmie’s Inc. Michael J. Mehner, Crystal BAy Service William W. Wear, Orono Shopping Center Richard Bloomquist, Ricks Super Valu On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor: Grant R. Wenkstern, Lake View Golf Course Ayes 4, nays 0. UHlI imphwnmM •III* •IiHtliT«1 •Iiiil* •ICiTt •IfV7 •Trra •1K«]• H.1 • Hil* •Iff* •171.1 • l•l■ff. •IliH •17K* • I*IiW« •irra •Hill •VT# •!. v^*Trr^ •lilif.f*!: •lff«1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 OTHER - CONT. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to accept the 1993/1994 Police contract as presented. Ayes 4, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned the regular Orono City Council meeting at 10:23 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 4, nays 0. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal I in. City Clerk To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Callahan and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A “""ttiianwe ’993. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator PlTVnm^ ''"fOFOHOH, February 3, 1993 #1768/1786 Dr. William R. and Rhonda T. Omlie, 1860 Shady wood Road - Variances/Conditional Use Permit Status of Application At the December 14, 1992 meeting, Council tabled the application providing applicant additional time to submit an amended proposal that would provide greater reductions in hardcover. A: the November 9th meeting. Council approved a side setback/variance for an addition to the existing attached garage. Application #1786 involves a conditional use permit dealing with the grading activities that could not be authorized under a building permit for new construction. The applicant has submitted an amended plan reflecting further additional reductions in hardcover than the plan submitted for the December meeting of the Council. The review facts are as follows: 1.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75’ setback area = 10,200 s.f. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing = 0 s.f. Pronosed = 0 s.f. 75-250’ setback area = 23,800 s.f. Approved per Bldg Permit 10/01/92 December Plan Auiendcd Plan House:2,930 sf .’,930 sf 2,930 sf Garage:815 833 833 Drivev;av:m 1,755 2,026 1,824 Sidewalk:150 195 212 Steps:39 33 18 Patio Areas:300 436 352 Deck:0 208 160 Retaining Walls:0 238 194 Landscape Areas: TOTAL 0 410 156 5,989 sf or 7.309 sf or 6.679 sf HARDCOVER: 25.2%30.7%28.n VARIANCE = 690 sf or 2.9^5 Zoning File ;S^1768/1786 February 3, 1993 Page 22.250-500’ setback area = 5,300 s.f.Allowed = 1,590 s.f. or 30%E.xisting = 1,665 or 31.4%Proposed in December = 1,803 s.f. or 34%Amended proposal = 1,665 s.f. or 31.4%(no change p» oposed within setback area)Section 1U.03, Subd. 21 - As for grading activities in excess of 100 cubic yards, the December plan proposed 300-400 cubic yards. Applicant ’s landscape architect advises that amended proposal proposes approximately 250-3(X) cubic yards. List of Exhibits A - Site Plan Approved with Building Permit and Side Setback Variance B -1-2 - Cross-Sections Retaining Walls C - Plans Submitted for December Council Meeting D - Grading and Drainage Plan E - Amended Plan The amended plan reflects grading reductions for drive area. Retaining walls have been reduced. The two-tiered retaining walls adjacent to mmaround area have been reduced to one tier. Both patio and deck have been reduced. There is a slight increase of sidewalk area. Landscape areas underlain with either plastic or geotechnic fabric have been reduced by 254 s.f. No changes are proposed from the original grading and drainage plan shown in original review (Exhibit D). The majority of drainage from these improvements continues to flow to the existing drainage swale within the southern portion of property. Options of Action Approval of variance/conditional use permit as proposed. Approval as amended by the Council, OR Denial. Council Action To provide conceptual direction to the staff so that an appropriate resolution can be brought back to the February 22nd meeting tor formal action of the Council. isv n *v • * \ . I • •» « *■rj%-; - <■#v- •. *1 *.s • .* • I • ^ .. : j.*.i.. r .. .JI • '•- x»»• •• • • r* ^ •,. ■ . . ^ • •• *•• r • -xv * V >^'v.".»•^J -41 CertlfIcate of Survey for Ouine N. HalJ , in Lots 27 I 29. Shadyvood Hennepin County, Minnesota /^ CITYOFOROflO;':.A SITE PUN __ GRADING PUN . •V-v;V ••: •t 4. .I ••^APPROVED-.0 APPROVED WITH REVISIONS .□ DISAPPROVED ■-• -•• wX;.- BY rifTLIOu^ ^ DATE ^ 1»2.g--gtg.~^ # .• ;• #• «•. ••*.f. i * •.*• r -•a-*' ^ -. V. • « . '••^ ; i ' I f eaUtU W»o%%- • . ' 0 1 • 1 ;? \\.\ oU 9 ^ . X . 1 # • • « - . ♦.•#• a. 711 ^..V.m tm m ^ - e, _ * . , . [ . ,• .• • ’ •* •** ‘** • • • • .^'^TTA^Vb * 1: ^ • r * ii* . . •. W • i • <•* . Tf-r,. .. • ••% - \r;#s»a - :• >.^1 I ' y r e*-T«r.--= irri1 r,ir'’-"-'-'-»r'\- •.. ■ ■■ \ ■'• -■ •4Mm^Uu -fc - -S.- . .C” .TT 1 .. .■! * ^ • . r ■ . •« ' V \ : V : >vl.c-‘ >• I"* 1* ^ • \ '• *.*i*‘. V^. —Jb .V.. -.. .• .•••.■. o e<:^r»r;.•--r:.- y,-——> — -» » »■>..» . — «* .-!. - • ^ ♦4. '....rr 4 ■'*. '*■. - • •’.•T"V . * . i* ' ^ 7 . ? ' r*. . ♦ —1*^ • /Mr • *trr.' " "j fccx— ' -'Jl ••-•r** .*■ - ,-*-.o j-i I w•am' •••* •.!•.■ • *'■"- ’ \ -.#<«.' *.• •. .Vv;. —. ••_•» —^ \ # . I I '. • •!-.**• • • ..- I'f V*'*** . ‘ \ ’ • •• .; **• • • _ • • ^ \\\ hereby certify that this Is a true 1ihd correct representation of V survey'of ”the boondjfle's 27_e*cept the North 15 feet, said tS.fcst being measured at’rlght angles from the said tot,, and Lot 28, all In Shadywood.-.and the location of all,existing buildings er -I I *OR»VEIJL.pLAMrnN(&ts Pi'uTTf»- rVnrm/Ato-,»y -*5-’*Hi* f?uod<6 WAC.C /3 ' /A 'a.\VEWAY W/s Lope F^o'Rss?^ 'RerWNfrvl^' \//Ht<cs CJKOSS NS A >A^UAWNV SUSMKTUMS P>CD*0 >J ^ 1^U«e.K> *aO/s *1 r»5 WAtc ?R0piXSBD ■Rp11M'N'/N.6» \MMJS ^ eiin'j W s k \ It ieiJ= r kitO . M* - -2S5.il- t this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of rth 15 feet, said 15 feet being measured at right angles from the North line 28. all in Shadywood. and the location of all existing buildings and a drive n. It does not purport to show other Improvements or encroachments. COFflN I GRONBERG. INC. Mark b. Gronoerg Lie. No. IZ/55 Gordon R. Coffin Lie. No. 6064 Engineers 1 Land Surveyors r Long Lake, Minnesota os :c4 ^1.(0 ^ 9 o : 1 ; #^ ^ VAouf 2.9SO.O 0.0 2,930.0 0.0 2,930.0 0.0 2,930.0 819.0 196.0 9S1.0 <118.0) 833.0 0.0 839.0 1,755.0 835.0 2,590.0 (S66.0) 2,026.0 (202.0)1,824.0 190.0 76.0 226.0 (31.0) 195.0 17.0 212.0 39.0 (27.0)12.0 21.0 33.0 (15.0)18.0 300.0 267.2 967.2 (111.2) 436.0 (84.0)992.0 0.0 231.9 231.9 (23.9) 208.0 (48.0)160.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 238.0 238.0 (44.0)194,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 410.0 410.0 (254.0)156.0 9,989.0 1,499.1 7,488.1 (179.1) 7,309.0 (630.0) 6,679.0 29,800.0 23,800.0 23,800.0 23,800.0 29.2X 6.3X 31.5K .;.8* lo.n •2.6X 28.11 i 9 ( _____ nma /V 1^- rtKra r<»AII;l* *4«S^ CITY OF ORONO APPLICATION NO. 1778/1779 P.O. Box 66 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Crystal Bay/ MN 55323 Date of Notice: 1/13/93 473-7357 TO: Andrew Goetten COPIES: Paul Anderson 1385 Fox Street Messerli & Kramer Wayzata, MN 55391 1800 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-4218 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: January 11, 1993 VOTE: 2 FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: To approve the request for lot line revision, credit of Outlot A toward area of Lot 1, and approval of resolutions with a number of amendments. (Copies of revised resolution drafts are attached- these will be finalized upon approval by the Mayor and receipt of a revised plat drawing from you.) A proposed Special Lot Combination Agreement has been enclosed, subject to Council approval. Preliminary Subdivision Plat Approval - Applicant must provide to the City all information and/or improvements required for final plat approval as noted in the preliminary plat approval resolution^ Preliminary nlat aporoval expires 1 year after the date of the resolTtTo7. "^Note tWt prior^ to filing of the final plat after final subdivision approval, all taxes for the current year must be paid. If you desire certified copies of Che official Council minutes, they are available from Che City Clerk after review ana approval by th6 City Council. r A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) AND 10.03, SUBDIVISION 6 (B), AND TO MUNICIPAL SUBDIVISION CODE SECTIONS 11.10, SUBDIVISION 14 AND 11.03.24 FILE #1778 WHEREIAS, Andrew J. Goetten (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1385 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 vB) and 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) , and to Municipal Subdivision Code Sections 11.10, Subdivision 14 and ll.()3.24, to permit the subdivision of the property into two building lots, pursuant to the provisions of Resolution #1178 in order to carry out the purpose and the intent thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1778. 2. The property is located in the RR-IB Rural Residenti^ Zoning DiatricC, requiring 2 acres o£ contiguous buildable land in each building lot per Municipal Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (3). 3 The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this appli on November 16, 1992 and on a vote of 6 in 0 aqainst, recommended that the property, comprising ^ over 3 acres in contiguous dry buildable area, be rezored to a 1 acre standard in conjunction with a general rezoning of the surrounding "Minnetonka Bluffs- area, so that the proposed lot area variance will no longer Page 1 of 5 4 . 5 . 6 . necessary The City Council reviewed this application on December 14, 1992 and considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, verbal and written comments by the applicant and his attorney, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. On December 14, 1992, the City Council voted 3 in favor, 1 against, with 1 abstention, to grant approval of the variance as requested by the applicant and direct staff to draft a resolution for approval. On January 11.. 1993 the applicant revised his request by requesting that the initially proposed lot line be moved westward, leaving 1.23 acres in Lot 2 and leaving Lot 1 with 1.78 acres plus 0.23 acres credit from Outlot A for a total of 2.01 acres. The Council finds that granting a variance to allow such credit is in keeping with the unique circumstances of Resolution #1178. The Council hereby determines that Resolution #1178 esv*ab]ishes a unique contract between the City and the applicant and the Council further finds that, whether or not said contract is legally enforceable, the unique circumstances surrounding Resolution #1178 and the subsequent placement of the MUSA boundary establish the clear intent of a past City Council which the current City Council intends to uphold. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grant variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10. , Subdivision 5 (B) and 1C.03, Subdivision 6 (B) and variances to Subdivision Code Sections 11.10, Subdivision 14 and 11.03.^4 to permit the subdivision of the applicant's property to create a acre lot with the existing residence and a 2+ acre new bull mg site in the RR-IB Zoning District using non-contiguous acreage where each lot would normally be required to contain at least two acres of contiguous area, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 1. 2 . 3 . January, ATTEST: Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a subdivision within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (January 11, 1994) . Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall a^’tomatically terminate any authority granted Aerein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of 1993 . Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of January, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hall in, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) _ day of _199t* h *i 55 v-ici/ _______________________ —' ^ ^ before me a Nocairy Public within and for said county, peisonally known to me to be the personTs) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) f X 9 9 before^me a No‘.ary PubiT^ within and for said county, personally K^to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed tne foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed t same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY P^tbLIC Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 3 aforesaid and running thence East 720 feet to the Northerly line or side of right of way of the Minnetonka Branch of the Great Northern Railway, thence Southwesterly along the Northerly line on side of said right of way, 027.05 feet to the West line of Lot 3 aforesaid; thence North 423.1 feet to place of beginning, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by tnree judicial landmarks placed at the most Easterly corner of said tract of land at a point in the Southwesterly line and at a point in the North line where said lines are intersected respectively by a line parallel to and 33 feet east of the West line of said lot. Also that part of the West 33 feet of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying Southerly of County Road No. 7, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by four judicial landmarks placed at the Northwest corner and the Northeast corner, respectively, of said tract of land, and at a point in the Westerly line thereof 208.3 feet South along said line from said Northwesterly corner, and in the East line thereof at a point 275.4 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 1385 FOX STREET - FILE NO. 1779 WHEREAS, Andrew J. Goetten, on October 23, 1992, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of the two lot residential plat of property legally described as: That part of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 3 aforesaid and running thence East 720 feet to the Northerly line or side of right of way of the Minnetonka Branch of the Grea^ Northern Railway, thence Southwesterly along the Northerly line on side of said right of way, 827.05 feet to the West line of Lot 3 aforesaid; thence North 423.1 feet to place of beginning, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by three judicial landmarks placed at the most Easterly corner of said tract of land at a point in the Southwesterly line and at a point in the North line where said lines are intersected respectively by a line parallel to and 33 feet east of the West line of said lot. Also that part of the West 33 feet of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying Southerly of County Road No. 7, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by four judicial landmarks placed at the Northwest corner and the Northeast corner, respectively, of said tract of land, and at a point in the Westerly line thereof 288.3 feet South along said line from said Northwesterly corner, and in the East line thereof at a point 275.4 feet Soutn of the Northeast corner thereof. (hereinafter "the property"); and Page 1 of 6 f 4 WHEREAS/ after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.38 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 16, 1992, at \.*hich time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on December 14, 1992, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Andrew J. Goetten, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The portion of the property proposed for subdivision is located within the RR-13 Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two ac.res of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approv:imately 3.66 acres, of which 3.01 acres is contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of 33 feet of right-of-way for Orono Orchard Road, wetlands, and the non-contiguous portions south of County Road 15 . 3. The proposed plat contains two lots. Lot 1 consisting of 1.73 dry contiguous acres plus 0.23 acres located south of County Road 15 for a total of 2.01 acres and Lot 2 consisting of 1.23 dry contiguous acres. Lot 1 requires a variance tc allow credit for non-contiguous area. Lot 2 requires a lot variance. These variances have been granted per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 3223 of the City Council. 4. Each of Lots 1 and 2 abuts a public roadway open to traffic, and each lot contains the required 200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear of the 50' front yard. 5. Lot 2, containing an existing residence, is within the Metropolitan Urban Service .Area (MUSA) and is provided with municipal sewer as part of the 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs Sewer Project. Lot 1, currently vacant, will not be served with municipal sewer, is outside the MUSA, and has been confirmed as having acceptable primary and alternate drainfield sites. Page 2 of 6 i 6 . A City designated wetland occurs within the property at two locations along the southeast border of the property. A conservation and flowage easement will be required over these wetlands. 7. 33' of right-of-way for Orcr.o Orchard Road will be dedicated within the plat. A small triangular portion of land shall similarly be dedicated as right-of-way for Orono Lane, from the portion of property located south of County Road 15. 8. No additional right-of-way will be dedicated for Fox Street. No upgrade of the existing Fox Street roadway will be required as part of this subdivision. 9. Lot 2 shall continue to gain access from Fox Street. Lot 1 shall be allowed access either on Fox Street or Orono Orchard Road (but not from both roadways) at a location to be approved by the Public Works Department. 10. The portion of property located south of County Road 15 and Orono Lane shall be platted as Outlot A, and shall be maintained in common ownership with Lot 1 as residential lake access for Lot 1, and shall be subject to a Sepcial Lot Combination to be filed on *-he Chain of Title of Lot 1 and Outlot A. 11. Lot 1 has been demonstrated to contain suitable primary and alternate drainfield sites to serve a proposed single family residence. Such a residence can be constructed on Lot 1 without the need for additional variances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Andrew J. Goetten at 1385 Fox Street per the survey dated 10-29-92, revised 11-5-92, by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. Variances will be granted for lot area for Lot 2 and non­ contiguous area credit for Lot 1 per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 3223 of the City Council. r ’.ge 3 of 6 L.. 2. Lot 1 shall be granted access on either Fox Street or Orono Orchard Road (but not on both roads) at a location to be approved by the Public Works Department. 3. A dedication of 33' right-of-way for Orono Orchard Road shall be indicated on the plat drawings. 4. A triangular portion of Orono Lane shall be dedicated for Orono Lane right-of-way on the plat drawings. 5. Applicant shall execute a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetlands located in Lots 1 and 2, and such easement shall be shown on the plat drawings as "drainage easements". 6. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be grantee’ along interior and perimeter lot lines. 7. The subdivision shall be subject to the standard park fee. 8. The lake access parcel located south of County Road 15 and Orono Lane shall be platted as Outlot A, and shall be maintained in common with Lot 1 as residential lake access for Lot 1, subject to a Special Lot Combination resolution to be filed in the Chain of Title of both Lot 1 and Outlot A. 9 The city •■^hall have the judicial landmark at the east end of the property replaced to its correct location. ^Q^iowing list of final submittals must be sub .itted to the Zoning Administrator :wo weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1 Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" - 200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated 10-29-92, revised 11-5-92. B Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. Page 4 of 6 C. Designation of the wetlands in Lots 1 and 2 as a drainage easement on the plat drawings. 2. Legal documents required: A. T tie opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. Signed and executed Conservation and Flowage Easement document; blank area requiring description may be filled out as follows: "Over the drainage easements as shown on the plat of {_rl9t name_)". D. Special -lOt Combination resolution for Lot 1 and Outlot A (City to draft). 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: $200.00* A. Legal review and filing fees = $200.00 B. *Park Commission shall accept park fee in lieu of lands. The City Assessor has been asked to determine the fair market value of the undeveloped lands within the subdivision so that a park dedication fee can be determined. Applicant will be advised as soon as Rolf Erickson, the City Assessor, has submitted his findings. Adapted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 11th day of January 1993. Page 5 of 6 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of January 1993, by Fdward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City clerk of the City of Orono, a Minn'isota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Pul .ic Page 6 of 6 SPECIAL LOT COMBINATION AGREEMENT This indenture is made and entered into this by and between day of their helrF, successors and assigns (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Grantor Cs) " and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"^ . VilTNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor(s) are the owner(s) of real property in the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State ,f Minnesota, legally described as follows (and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "properties"): Lot 1, Block 1, (hereinafter described as "Parcel A"); and Outlet A, (hereinafter described as "Parcel B"); and WHEREAS, Parcel A and Parcel B are physically separated from each other which prevents their being combined into one legally described lot or parcel, and/or for the same or o^ner reason the Hennepin County Assessor cannot combine Parcel A and Parcel B into one parcel for tax purposes; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the above it is the intent of used and/or developed in common by Grantor(s) as if they were in fact one parcel instead of two. NOW THEREFORE, fet and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and ocher valuable consideracion. Grantor(s) hereby covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to grantee the to restrict, and Grantor(s) hereby agree . preclude the ownership, use, improvement and ?nv^n?nts A and Parcel B according to and under the condi-ions and herein contained, as follow: 1 Grantor(S) agree that Parcel A and Parcel B shell henceforth be contained in common use and ownership even bemused* ?ots or parcels, and that Parcel A and Parcel B will not be used, conveyed, sold, leased or otherwise encumbered except together as if they were a single parcel. 2. Grantor(s) and Grantee agree that Parcel A shall be considered the primary parcel which may be used or developed for any principal use as may be permitted in the zoning district, subject to all performance standards and approvals required therefore. 3. Grantor(s) and Granteg agree that Parcel B shall be considered accessory to Parcel A, and that Parcel B may be used or developed f.)»- accessory uses as may be permitted in the zoning district, but only at such time that a principal use is established on Parcel A, and subject to all performance standards and approvals required therefore. 4. Gr-'ntor(s) agree to restrict and limit the use and/or imorovement of Parcel B as follows: a.No structures may be constructed or located on Parcel B except the following: c t • 1) One seasonal dock; location and number of slips allowed shall be per the regulations of the LMCD. 2) One lock box no greater than 20 square feet in area and no g.’iater than 43 inches in height. 3) Lakeshcre access stairway/lift/landing subject to requirements of Municipal Code Section 10.56 "Shoreland Management". b. Parcel B shall not serve as an accessory parking area. c.Parcel B is created for the exclusive use of the owners of Parcel .A. 5. Grantee sh< 11 not issue any building permit, zoning variance or conditional use permit for any structure or use on the propertie.s inconsistent with the covenants contained herein. lawfully removed from these properties structures, uses, substances and nac >ra. or inconsistent with the co'-'enants contained herein. 7 In addition to any other remedy Grantee may have, the covenants i..d restrictions contained herein may be Grantoris; who are in possession of t.hese bv Grantee all costs and expenses including attorneys fees incu y Grantee in enforcing the terms of this indenture. 8. The terms and conditions of this indenture amended or extinguished and thereafter Parcel A and Parcel B may -e subdivided, sold separately or reduced in part only upon application by Grantor(s) to Grantee for approval of a "Subdivision" in accordance with the platting code of the City in effect at the time of such application. 9. Grantor(s) agree that recording of this indenture shall not vest any property rights in the properties and that any zoning or development authorities granted herein or hereinafter because of this indenture shall r;?main subject to future regulation modification and/or limitation by Grantee or other regulatory bodies in accordance with legally applicable and enforceable zoning or other ordinances of Grantee. 10 Grantor (s) do not intend that the public should have any interest, in the above properties by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except as hereinabove set fortn. All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. CITY OF ORCNO GRANTOR(S) By. Mayor And City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss.(City Acknowledgment) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing •'nstrument was acknowledged before me this ----- day of __ _ _ _19__. by."Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on bexialf of the municipal corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COr-IMISSICN EXPIRES i f— STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of (Individual Acknowledgment) , 19 , before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ _ ___ known to me to be the persons Ts) described'ilT and who'executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he" (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES This document is being recorded for the benefit of the City of Orono per Minnesota Statutes 386.77. State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt This instrument was drafted by. City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 willjam r. Mr.r>sr«:4ui X. MMA vcr tom ro<3A9 OAViO A P^RAO’^M MARK 9 I.AAAON Yimotmv u B^kuiin ^O^CRT o WCNNXI9, JR. OCORQc R aCPOAR AARO va L. RXR cn CMfin^roPHCP 0 munT «»AMCS C. W»CKA ^OACRH a RiXRCNRePO william n. Hie««9 • WILLJAM M. HAA iC mT Messerli & Kramer ATTOPNCVS at law niOO FIF-Th STRCer TOWCRS ISO South rirrH strcct MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 85402-A2ie (612) «T2 -3000 facsimile (ejl2) 07Z-3TT7 ^MITCW t »lArCT OIAW ALMden 672-3601 ►all w XKl^^C^BOht WJLUAM D. TuPkuI-A • •YIANK %. rAARCLu.VR amn m serNcrs • johm r AAir:c anlc L jOmnSOm lcannc q LirrtN RXTPR o. HAON uSOIW ^a .c P2ncc PArcpiiTtoA MIGMACL L WEAVCR WILLIAM a. B uTlCR • A„*0 AOM.TTt* .M NOAT m Os«OtA » ALi 5 a £,J.1»T|»j^ tp, 8ll*CO**S.I» February 5, 1993 Jean Mabusth Zoning Administi*atcr City of Orono P.O.Box 66 Crystal Bay. .VL\ 55323 BY PAX 473-0510 Ee: Goetten Variance/'Subdivision Applications No. 1778 and No 1779 Our File; 764M Dear Ms. Mabusth; Following our telephone conversation of February 3. 1993,1 spoke with Andrew Goetten, who indicated that he had not in fact discussed our proposf'd revisions to the Variance and Subdivision Resolutions and the Special Lot Combination Agreement with Michael Gaffron. We felt the best way to communicate these suggested revisions was in writing. The suggested revisions are as follows: A. B n. A. Resolution Granting Variance: This Resolution contains three references to Code Section "11.03.24 “. These appear in the title to the Resolution, the second "WTiereas" clause, and in the first paragraph of the Conclusions, Order and Conditions section on page 2 of the documenL My assumption is that the .24 in these references is intended to mean Subdivision 24. If so, the Resolution should be revised to so state. The fifth and sixth lines of the paragraph labeled Conclusions, Order and Conditions contains the term "1 acre lot". This should be changed to “1.23 acre lot" to be consistent with Finding No. 5 of the Resolution. Resolution Granting Pi’eiiminary Plat Approval: Finding No. 3 on page 2 of the Resolution and Condition No. 1 on page 3 of the Resolution contain a reference to "Resolution No. 3223". We assume Lhat the referenced Jean Mabusth February 5, ’.993 Page 2 B. A. B. C. Resolution is the Resolution granting the variance..- (discussed above); however, no Resolution number appears on that P<<solution. Pleaso make sure that the cross references are to the proper Resoluhou numbers when the Resolutions are enacted by the Council. I Finding No. 4 of the Resolution refers to the "5(y front yard". As it appe^ that this reference is to the applicable front yard set back requirement, the words "set back line’ should be inserted at the end of paragraph 4. IIL Special Lot Combination Agreement: The clause beginning "NOW THEREFORE" on page 1 of the Agreement contains a typographical error in the last line. The word "follow" should be 'follows . Paragraph 3 of the Agreement appear s to state that Parcel B, the lakeshore outlot, may be used or developed only after the principal use (i.e., residential development) is established on Parcel A (Lot 1). Mr. Goetttn has, from time to time, maintained a dock on the lakeshore lot and does not want the right to continue to maintain a dock impaired during the time he owns both Lots 1 and 2. Consequently, the clause "but only at such time that a principal use is established on Parcel A" should be deleted from paragraph 3. Paragraph 4. a,(3) refers to lakeshore access "stairway/lift/landieg". Please insert the words "boat" prior to the words lift and landing in that subsection. D. Paragraph 9 of the Agreement is somewhat unclear as to what rights the City might have with respect to the lot combination in the future. We request that paragraph 9 be revised to read as follows: i I "Grantorts) agree that the properties shall remain subject to future regulation, modification and/or limitation by Grantee or other regulatory bodies in accordance with legally applicable and enforceable zoning or other ordinances of Grantee; provided that such regulation shall not interfere with the rights of Grantor as set forth in this Agreement." i Please contact me as soon os possible with any questions or comments regarding this letter. If the revisions noted herein can be made prior to the Council meeting next Monday, it will not be necessary for Mr. Goetien or his representative to appear at that meeting. Jeau Mabusth Februar>' 5, 1993 Page 3 Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Yours very ti\ily, MESSERU & KRAMER Paul W. Anderson cc: Andrew Goeiten PWA:nnr:J657l)_l J TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmcnibcrs Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator February 3, 1993 0k '' <i V ' % -■Jj ^1787 Robert VVaade, 998 Wildhursl Trail - Conditional Use Permit- Resolution % Additional Exhibits G - Waade Letter 212192 U - Amended Floor Plan Brief Review of Application The applicant seeks a conditional use permit to install a non-rental apartment within the principal structure currently under major reconstruction. The application involves Lot 1, Block 1 of Wildhurst Estates, a recent subdivision approved by this City, containing 1.56 acres in area. The property meets all required lot standards of the LR-IB Zoning District. The issue for the review at the Planning Commission was that the primary access to the 1,000-b s.f. apartment area was not from within the interior of the principal residence but via the unfinished garage The size of the apartment was also questioned but it was also noted that there are no area limitations set fonh in the Code. The principal strucmre itself is 7,000 s.f. in area and as applicant notes valued at $1,000,000.00. Review Exhibit G, applicant advises that it is highly unlikely that a future owner would offer for rent an apartment in a house valued at $1,000,000*00. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the application and conditioned approval on applicant submitting a revised plan redefining access area within the principal structure meeting the intent of the ccxle (refer to Exhibit H). Access is now' located within an office and with stairs leading directly to upper level apartment. The conditional use permit is to be issued to the current owner and shall expire upon the sale or transfer of fee title to another agent or person. It would then be the responsibility of the next owner > apply for a conditional use permit if non-rental apartment use is to continue. It not, future owner will be responsible for making necessary' alterations to structure so that kitchen area is removed. Please note applicant has asked Council to reconsider this condition. All other standards of the conditional use pennit are to be adhered to as follows: 1. All utilities shall be metered under the meter for the principal structure. There will be no separate address provided for the .iparlment user Zoning File #1787 Februar)' 3, 1993 Page 2 3. Parjcing shall be provided on site either within interior garage stall or within exterior paved outdoor parking. Please review the enclosed staff memo prepared for the Planning Commission packets for more background and detail. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission ’s recommendation for Council ’s review and action. J A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 3 FILE nm WHEREAS, Robert L Waade, (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the pronerty located at 998 Wildhurst Trail within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described ,<s: Lot 1. Block 1, Wildhurst Estates, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to die City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit the installation of a non-rental guest apanment within the existing principal structure currently under major reconstruction per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cit'' Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File ^1787. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshorc Residential 2U)ning District requiring 1 acre in area. The propert)' consists ot 1.56 acres. 3.On January 19, 1993, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as amended and recommended approval based on the following findings: A) Primary access to the second story apartment over the garage has been rekKated within the principal structure. Page 1 of 5 There is adequate area either within the earage or within the exterior parking area to provide adequate parking to serve apartment users. Sewer and all other utilities will be metered under the meter for the principal residence. There will be no separate address provided for the apartment use. 4.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the non­ rental guest apartment will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and tte affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDKR AM) CONDM IONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 to tn* current owner and applicant, Robert L. Waade, to permit a non-rental apartment within his residence Kx;ated at 998 Wildhurst Trails, subject to the following conditions: 1.This conditional use permit is granted to the current owner and applicant and shall expire upon sale or transfer of fee title td another agent or person. It shall be the responsibility of a future owner to apply for a conditional use permit if the non­ rental apartment use is to continue. If not, the owner will be responsible for obtaining a building permit to make the necessary alterations to structure so that the kitchen area is removed. Page 2 of 5 1 3. 4. ATFEST: Upon application for a building permit for the installation of the guest apartment, applicant shall provide amended plans drawn by an architect retlecting the redesien of interior access to second floor apartment. The apartment installed above the attached g..rage can never be used for rental purposes but must remain for the exclusive use of family members, guests or domestic help. Authorities granted by this resolution are pennissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (February 8, 1993). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violatio.. »• * Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalt of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording ol this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of February, 1993. Dorothy M. Ilallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of February, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary’ Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dav of , 199 before ! :e a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared_________________________________ ________________________known :o me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) NOTARY PUBLIC On this dav of . 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personaliy api^eared__________________________ - known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 f TOs Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:January 13, 1993 SUBJECT:#1707 Robert Waade, 998 Wildhurst Trail Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District LR-IB Required area = 1 acre or 43,560 s.f. Existing = 1.56 acres or 68,336 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances Section 30.24, Subdivision 3. Conditional use permit required for non-rental/guest apartment within residence currently under construct ion. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2. Hardcover review. 0-75' setback area ■ 30,393 s.f. Existing hardcover in zone = 450 s.f. or 1.5% Proposed = 450 s.f. or 1.5% Hardcover remains unchanged 75-250' setback area ■ 37,943 s.f. Existing hardcover • 7,796 s.f. or 20% Proposed • 9,386 s.f. or 24.7% No hardcover variance required Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C). Lot coverage review Total area » 60,336 s.f. Allowed « 10,250 s.f. or 15% Prop'^sed « 6,900 s.f. or 10.09% No lot coverage variance required List of Exhibits A - Application B - 1-2 Property Owners List plus Certification C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Floor Plans ? - Elevation Rsvisw of Application Building permit #4416 was issued to applicant on July 22, 1992 to permit the major reconstruction of the existing residence. Portions of the comprehensive improvement included a non-rental guest apartment above the garage. The kitchen portion of the plans Zoning File #1787 January 13, 1993 Page 2 was not approved and applicant was advised of the need for a conditional use permit. It is staff's understanding that a member of Mr. Waade's immediate family will reside in the non-rental apartment. The standards for a non-rental guest apartment are very specific. Review Exhibits E and F. The primary access to the apartment must be from within the principal residence. Note pjfimary access to residence is from a seconvdary door adjacent to garage structure. Review plan for first floor. The door enters into open area that leads to upper staircase. Open area also has a door to the principal structure. Review second floor plan at top of stairs. There is an entrance to a walk-in closet located within the master bedroom area of the principal structure with an entrance door to the apartment. The apartment is approximately 1,100 s.f. in area and proposes two bedrooms. The required parking can easily be satisfied with exterior parking or within garage stall. Property is served with sewer and all utilities will be metered under the meter for the principal residence. Consistent with all non-rental apartments there will be no separate address provided for the apartment use. Although not required by ordinance, it should be noted that the property does meet all required lot standards of the LR-IB Zoning District. Issues for Consideration 1.Does the access through primary structure meet the i.ntent of the code? 2.Does the area of the structure of the apartment have any impact on your considerations? The approximate area of the finisheH floor area of the principal structure is 7,000+ or - 3.f. Options of Action To approve as proposed or To approve subject, to either revisions in floor plan for apartment or layout of access through primary structure to apartment area or Zoning File #1787 January 13, 1993 Page 1 Other or Denial. If application is ;o be denied, applicant must submit a revised building plan showing removal of kitcuen area and redefining of space. CI m'Y C j> ORONO - GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address k Property Identification Nunber (P.I.D.) ffiLPmnesT 71?. Qgo/u o 1-7 !?> 0^1 p. UOT ' BLOCK- I lOILDH uKST t-srATes Please attach legal description to applica 1 . if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name '"'^rky’xk. L. LOaadC^ Phone (home) Phone (work) ^SS Address^^SUjlLDBU^T I i? »City Pro AO Phone (home)___ Phone ___________ City _________ Zip S:^Ho^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ______________________________ Address Zip $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP applicatCfSihOr UROHO , Fif^A^CE OFFICE $125.00 Residential accessory Use i5t) (Sv' CHECK " TJ 750.0C'ocrc T o r_ tua vnn ltL.Ci.ai I iMrtIfli * C’U rrtMf <>•!» ri.-Tf^.%/I ^tJV WWi l\\/A I _ _ _ $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) XI $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS , , , * $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) - - - - $250.00 Vacation ‘ $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision - - - - $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTYPresent Zoning DistrictPresent Use of Property cb JO.I Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: LlVlfOCb jis c\\TcuLLf^{ Cqa oi^pi'^ On ^ tinilrv rriAsT^ tic tim REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1^ Completed Application Form, 2fV) Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obta this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governme Center 348-3271). , , o / • - • -h- Plat Map. •Uou^^UPt _ (jjJlluiM'i Certificate 'of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if lane alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Cojistruction plan/ if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. NiAs an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of f VvSsJpvany other persons you wish notified of this application. Crvtif-LocKoN « YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR 4. 5. 6'. A WORKING COPY (11* X 17’ OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SOBMITTED The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all irforma*-ion required oi requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the^est of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature Date iO-Q.! ' OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City steff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Jo Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have ar authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoninc Office of this change prior to the meeting. s* PROPERTY OWNERS LIST FOR APPLICATION #1787 07-117-23-21 0016 Harriet Morgart 1003 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 21 0004 Charles & Mary Boehm 997 Wildhurst Trail Mourd, MN 55364 07-117-23 12 0002 A & L Scderma 975 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 24 0031 O Larry Lee 1690 University Ave Suite 130 St. Paul, Mt^ 55104 07-117-23 21 0013 Nancy Ferrell 1001 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 21 0003 James & Barbara Olexa 995 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 24 0029 Harvey Schultz Box 282 Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 24 0032 Steven Sigafoos 2900 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 07-117-23 21 0005 Robert Cavan 999 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 12 0003 DJ Hawkins & CW Larson 993 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 24 0030 Michael McKenney 1045 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 24 0043 John & Cindy Culliton 1131 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 24 0017 WS Brickley/JM Fuchs 07-117-23 24 0040 Richard Walter, Jr. 07-117-23 24 0015/16 _ _ _ _ _Ole St Helen Overboe 4440 Forest Lake Landing 4450 Forest Lake Landing 4470 Forest Lake Landing Mound, MN 55364 Mound, MN 55364 Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 24 0042 07-117-23 24 0041 07-117-23 24 0011 Judson & Francis Rogers John & Karen Prew Diane E. Benson 4400 Forest Lake Landing 449C Forest Lake Landing 1080 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 Mound, MN 55364 Mound, MN 55364 07-117-23 24 0045/46 07-117-23 13 0216/217 Robert Waade 998 Wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE C'F MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENTJEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1787, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. i In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 7th day of January, 1993. Jamie ^sma ^4 u it uKJU^c:^ U . U U (/SEc.6,r,i;r.-.:3 r: i.; f m ‘r''* .'m » m '"•* • #1 ••.• • f.'i 't> « • •. > . t/*9 < r« 9’:J h^t'Sr 0 DpTBtei I ron fitsmiTmt; wnri ^ offMt tt3k« JfS ni •*litlni5 •l*v. ^CO).0) propoMd cirv. ^ turfacv drjlrwg# rrcpjMd flrw #l«v, rrrro»»U loMcc floor •l«v. •^'“PoMd top of fouiiiUan •lav. #o »JOHV«: ftrT«aK» Mr »M» *» Ft . ii rtt • «r* fwrntmmt 9t § 9» '» *'t^ •• •« « <«n« 'hriMry rfcn. PREPARED RO. P ■ iC; Vj I HI ;■ '. .. * 1‘ •.» n • • :’v : ’ ‘ J’.' ’ ^ • * • ' ! •» p “ , IV > ’‘‘W, ' c? CUSTOM BUILI Award Winning Homes t ' . - - - ^f- f^.Jt. , iC_ Jyu^ iO a^ . 4) f-^ J',1^ ImjH-^ 1 ) -l^f^ a /'V'I o -Li , aJ-ictit 'ti'^-^ *• . fr«,c Ji'i' ^■'''’ P!uav X«-P iX,; / ,y ct,i_. I -.‘I. l^ic't - !''■' P ^ i" L ( p, "'f / ux b ^ ^ ^ ^ (^ACiiC ^Ad.v X^1>J X^'UiA t V.I? (9 a dco-' ^ co^i.ctcudMtC' aoo-^:,vnuut Sl 'v^Aat ti',w:./ V,oj tp^^diC\cUuc\i^ » -1 „/......< 4 / ^ ' . 1 ■ I • /! I . , ^ ------- ^ 'T', f A \t ' iX^t v,\'\i-^'C6.3A--tU * ^ ^ \ '/i i'— f Wii.niuXa^ aw J ^ ^ MMim.Ai... OU, ^aa,=.o-.«w ‘--J a'/'Owa p PoH/\C VLU91.X//UX '^' ,W -a:ia. w ,, , -ii'ijj w)e.ct-L\xXA 1^- ' ' -,i -f- -to w'.^'£''<'^'^ ^ ^ *^uotX -U\cct aiaV i-vCGuc.t p ■ii^' ia« ovvi-eavtfeuu^^ , -'Cc ,^(t^ go-v a.^apvt.A^; .....rrv.vJoxcXi ■ C+^ :,Hujn au ^ U-VLI^ ^o.1 ,TuJai oppucarfw , djVi aoaoa -H- —~7 ’ A !v.a .a^ cw*^“^ CUV r CA lP^ .AW.' J aa»w.,.rf«fc t . .JCi-UJL^'i''''''^''"'^ ■ rN.- kW^tc_ « / TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator FROM: DATE: SUBJECT; Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator ' Februar\’ 2, 1993 #1789 Libbie Hopwood. 1205 Lakcview Avenue - Variances Review of Application The fonner residence on the property was totally destroyed by fire in early 1992. It is the intention of the applicant to rebuild within the same building envelope making use of the existing footings. In order to rebuild the applicant must apply for area and setback variances meeting the standards of the 2 acre RR-IB Zoning District. The property is slightly under a 1/2 acre in area at 21,357 s.f. Lot coverage is proposed at 8.5% (15% is allowed for lots under 1.99 acres). A street setback variance was approved in 1990 for a street side deck measuring 8 ’x40.9 ’ (refer to Exhibit E). Refer to Exhibit F, the street side deck is no longer proposed but an entr\' porch on the southwest side is proposed and will be located 25 rather than 23 as the former deck. Please review the enclosed st iff memo and packet prepared for the Planning Commission for more background in detail on the review. Tlie Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the variances sought by the applicant. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission ’s fmdings and conditions of approval. r A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1789 WHEREAS, Libbie Hopwood (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1205 Liikeview Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, "Maxwell ’s Addition" to Crystal Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the complete reconstruction of a residence destroyed by fire requiring approval of an area variance of 75%, propeny has a total of 21,357 s.f. or .5 acres where 87,127 s.f. or 2 acres is required, a front street setback variance of 25’ or 50% and a side street setback variance of 20’8" or 41.6% where a 50 ’ setback is required. Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1789. The propeny is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19, 1993 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A. The property is served with sewer. Page 1 of 4 B. A principal structure could not be placed on the propeny meeting all required setbacks of the 2 acre RR-IB Zoning District. The property is 1/2 acre in area and a narrow comer lot. C. The structure was demolished by fire in 1992. D. A residence structure has existed on the property since 1956 and at that time satisfied all standards of the zoning district in effect (15,000 s.f. in area and 100’ lot width). E. The structure is to be rebuilt in the former building envelope and will encroach no closer into substandard setback areas. The purpose of rebuilding in the same envelope is to make use of the existing footings of the fomier .struemre. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) and to permit the reconstructi«?n of a residence completely destroyed by fire requiring area and side and tront street setback variances, subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a subdivision within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 8, 1994). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the tenns and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3.The undersigned applicant has read, understixxl and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the rcci'rding of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 4 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of February, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of February. 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the Ci:y. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 3 of 4 STATE OE MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared_________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instmment. and acknowledged tiiat he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of . 199 before me a Notary* Public within and for said county, personally appeared ________________________________ ________________________ know n to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoine instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 To t Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: January 13, 1993 #.1789 Libbie Hopwood, 1205 Lakeview Avenue Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2 . Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) required for reconstruction original building envelope. - Setback and area variances of principal structure within A.Required area = 2 acres or 87,127 s.f. Existing - 21,357 s.f. or .5 acres. Variance =» 65,763 s.f. or 1.5 acres B.Front street setback (Arbor Street) Former and proposed = 28' 3" (principal stu.vture) Former deck = 23' (former northwest deck at 23' street setback required a variance of 27' or 54%, approved 9/90) Proposed entry porch = 25+' Variance » 25' or 50% C.Side street setback Required = 50' Former principal structure » 29.2' Proposed principal structure = 29.2' (refer to Exhibit ! , note 30' setback from side street for fireplace along northeast side of structure) Variance = 20' 8" or 41.6% Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Lot coverage. (Lot is less than 1.99 acres). A.Total lot area ■ 21,357 s.f. Allowed ■ 3,204 s.f. or 15% Proposed * 1,831 s.f. or 8.5%* Note 12' X 12' accessory structure to be removed and 10' X 18' grade level deck is not included within lot coverage standards because no railing is proposed. 3. Section 10.03, Subd. 15 - Non-encroachments. A. Fireplace is considered an encroachment as it is wider than 1-1/2' and is located in a substandard street yard. i Zoning Fiit* January 12, 1933 Page 2 B. Grade level deck with no railings can be located 2' from any lot line. Applicant proposes 11' from the east side lot line. List of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I J K L Application Property Owners Lis" Plat Map Sketch-Distance of Subject Property from Lake Minnetonka Original Site Plan Proposed Site Plan Sketch of Conforming Building Envelope Resolution No, 2871 Comprehensive Improvement Plan Floor Plans Elevations Building Section-Height Determination Description o£ Request The applicant seeks approval of setback variances to allow principal structure to be reconstructed within the former building envelope. The original structure was completely destroyed in a fire in early 1992. The structure has been completely demolished and all that remains are the original footings of the block foundation. It is the desire of the applicant to rebuild a two and one-half story residence requiring street and side setback variances. Rather than rebuilding the 8' x 40.9' street deck (refer to Exhibit E) , ::he applicant proposes an 8' x 13' porch entry along the southwest side of the structure. Former street deck was located 23' from the street lot line. The proposed entry por.'L is 25'. RevieV ”xhibit L, The structure will meet the req’*ired 30' maximum a.'. Iajw* d height. The applicant proposes the removax of the 12' X 12' »/•'essory structure to the south side of the property. Lot coverage is maintained at 8.5%. It is staff's understanding that Mrs. Hopwood proposes the reconstruction of a residence for future sa_e. It is not the intention of applicant to reside in the proposed residence. History o£ the Zoning In November of 1950, the Crystal Bay Zoning District was created establishing residential and commercial areas but no lot standards were established. In September of 1955. a general zoning ordinance was passed requiring that all new lots meet the minimum Zoning File January 12, 1993 Page 3 area of 15,000 s.f. and a 100' lot width. A building permit was issued on December 1, 1956 to construct the former residence. The plat of Maxwell Bay Addition to Crystal Bay was approved August 29, 1921. Obviously there were no zoning standards at that time, but in 1956 the subject property would hav'c satisfied the current zoning in effect at that time (15,000 s.f. area and 100' l?.t width). Note that a lot width variance has not been required as property is sewered and meets 80% of the required lot width of 200' at the street setback line. In the Crystal Bay area, residential lots average 0.50 acre in area and lot widths ranjo from 50' to 100' . Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A. Applicant notes the inability to expand lot lines or acquire additional lands. Refer to Exhibit G, -he sketch that outlines the conforming building envelope. A principal structure could not be placed on the property meeting all required setbacks for the RR-IB zoning district. Applicant notes the fact that although property is one-half acre in area, j.t is subject to the two acre standards. The obvious hardship is that the structure was lost in a fire and now must be replaced. It is the desire of the applicant to make use of the existing footings so that structure can be rebuilt j.n the same building envelope. Isv CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) r? T1.-- %) I. j i PROPERTY INFORMATION r T TV rr nrjukin L.- i I t \Jt r.crrrc Jl V' \/V^ V “ *iT rum- Tf nr IV. •Va.w.'cW Site Address / 2-0^ h: fjCrnCjT Vniinv.v..ii i I I'nttn i vu O.-f Tfn*rri.u‘v'jiw ci/vi iav» < V /n i /C Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired oCP (month/year) I i^|.(do not) also own the ^jacent parcels of land. :,W\j cf tr Present use of property; v residential _ _ _other (specif y/JJV Zoning District; '' r cB pB^TKoft APPLICANT Name ^ Phone, (home) /Vg>plOO.X> Phone (wor)c) 33BS Address ; 9^2 Sc>UT>4 McPf^kyAJ^ Zip; 5V3"45 0Dil^ (if different than applicant) ^Ci^Name iT'T C? B Y'~U^ . DBU>B-V/^lLL Address: _ _ _ _ _ _/VP City; Phone (home) Phone (work) " _ _Zip; Estimated Construction Cost $ ^DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area X Setback: 4 Lot Width Front Side Hardcover _ _Lot Coverage Hear _ _ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or pract’-cal difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements; J (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITxALS All of the following infomuition must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of '• ^ .any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8.^''.K^d^-tional items as may be requested by City staff. 1 ._}/^ompleted Application Form 2. ^yCertified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _J/^at flap (obtained with property owners list). 4» i/*^Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations* ^s required (provide one (i)- copy 8%”xll" for ^reproduction). 5._V_Topographic -subvey ^existing', and' proposed elevations) if any changes JrTi existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5"xll”). 1/Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%”xll"). The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember tnat your varirance application is not complete if the above Information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1------—-----------------------------_________________________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE Th^ appl'icant hereby i^grees to,'provide'* al'l *ihformation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date /- 9^ OWNERS SIGNATURE* The owner hereby ackouledges and agrees to this application and further •authorises xeasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request/* (V\nier ' s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. ^f an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled me'^tlng, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent ’■end in your place and to ad/ise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I •• • * V \ '4 • \ t 'V >«. , Jk-i .■> e «; • k *v 'I'. 4 » V * •> * • -n • ( » j m\ DATE n/Z^/9ZDATCn 006PROP APPR OtmCR NAMC TAXTAYCR riAMryAODR PROP ADOR CHINrR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER name TAXPAYER NAJtC/ADOR PROP ADDR 01 PIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 lO-117-r5 2^* 001701115 HILIOH DR 5 TODD M GAOniELSON ET At TODD M A sun E GADRIELSON 1115 HULOH PR S MAY/^ATA MM 55391 38 10-117-23 2<» 0021 01205 LAKCVICU AVC A L MOPinx^O A L G HCPIlOOO At t IIOPMOOO «22 7Ti; ST 5 HOPKINS rtl 553<#3 38 10-117-23 28 0028 01285 LAKCVICM AVE 0 M FEIK A C G TEIK ORUCE M A CLARICE G FEIK 1285 LAKEVIEM AVE MAY2ATA fPI 553^1 38 10-117-23 31 0070 01215 AROUR ST CMAUnCEY HI SAflDGREM ETAl C H SAMOGRtfl 1215 ARDOR STCCET HAY2A1A Itl 553^1 IIEH1CPIM COUNTY PROPERTY INroRMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OlftlERS LIST58 10-117-23 28 001901220 LAKEVIEM AVE DOUGLAS PAUL SCHMvX)R A HIFE DOUGLAS A NORMA SCHNOOR 1220 LAKEVIEM AV MAYZATA m 553^1 38 10-117-23 28 0022 01212 ARDOR ST J R CADY A S R CADY S R CADY A J R CADY 1212 ARDOR ST MAYZATA rtl 5530X 38 10-117-23 28 0031 01185 ARDOR SI GAR CARLSON STEPHEN C A Ru.:OI J CARLSON 1105 ARDOR ST MAYZATA rtl 55301 TOTAL PATCH 006 00010 REPORT NO. PI835801 PAGE 11 ^ t'« *J8 10-117-23 2<i 0020 oii^s PROtif^ no 3LIMOA C CUtflIItiCSLINDA c ruiimric-s1165 OROtSl RO S MAY2ATA UN 55391 38 10-117-23 26 0023 01225 lAKEVItH AVE V II ROLLINGS ETAL VIRGIL M ROLLINGS 1225 LAKEVIEM HAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0069 01230 ARDOR ST C H NARRtN ALA MARREN CHARLES N A LISA A HARREN 1230 AROOR ST HAYZATA IVI 55391 i J } t I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE! RCPRESTNIATION OF INIORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEIAIEPIM COUNTY OEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO TI;E CEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND HELIEF. DATE 11 J n- . (12)oC‘5^•\ ( I) S«a*y 4 .., f > iO • // T' r -N ^ ,!.i^ •■^(30)‘ ^ s »^ s 9 « ^ H A ‘ a~ s ’V a A • ^ C •'^5 A ,v^« R '’ s 5^|T« 15 ^ 1 ■•« » iVJDrfrWT A \ (J4) (16) s . fl 140 •'* JJi* X.»«>4 X ”\ fl4(^ X.= alir - ?. 8140! j1 ‘ ^ 140 '5 Vi ’ a 14P *'?.p'^'fc 4 ^ 140 " UO H ^ B ? 3iS I4C ! ^140 ?. « a; 140 T \ ' <-’“yir a '•" a I4C a A (75^ a. HI? Wj ^ 10......1*v ...... Si V '» al N " '*' --1^ (74) 8) (7,1 •■' Ok'Jt & •s> S’. \ «?)V (17) \ 1 18) A (7) / / / (19) M." 21)1 ♦ .•> (20) • Wj — ^Ai^l 19 'x >, •r ?7B 35 \ 9-. K 3 K.MP i4r • 69)\ %J1N d^:'v* % %* •> ' . ^ \ u >. Q 1/ V7 ( V/ Q: ^1DQ, Or Scalei 1»«30' O Dttnotes Iron Monuments Found \ 1 hereby certify that this ts a true and correct repreamUntion of a survey of the boundaries of Lots 12 and 13, block 1, MAXWILLL'S AUDITION lO CRYSTAL BAY, Hennepin County, Minnesota and of the location of all buildings thereon, and all visible encroachaenta, if any, fron or on said land. Surveyed by ae this 26th day of August, 1992. FrankV. Car^arelle State Rso. We. isoS J I horoby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct suporvinion, and that I am a duly registered Civil Enqinoor and band Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. COFFIN & GRONDERG, INC. Hark S. Gronbory MN. Lie. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyor*, Planner* Long Lake, Minnesota Scale: 1 inch «■ 30 feet Date ! April 6, 1990 o : Iron marker set noarings shown are baaed upon an assumed datum. n'^ i /; Csr 'k »’s- • • /J f. .^•! -ii 3cal«i l”-50' O Dwiotaa Jron Monuin«nts Pound 1 haraby cartify that thla ia a trua and corract rcprasentntlon of n aurvay of tho t>oundnrios af Lula 12 and 13, Block 1, MAXWELL'S ADDITION TO CHYST aL DAY, Hannapln Couitty, Mlnnaaota and of iha location of all buildinga tharaon, and all ’'isibla ancroachaiantat if any, fro* or oaid land* Survayad by M thia 26th da) of Auguat, 1992. •• . ■ a *r'raTk>f^ Ca^aralla Stata Aag. No. iyA • ■ \ ► ? 'rr L- J •• *• 5721345 / : A- CITY OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^871_ _ _ _ _ A RXSOLOTIOM GKAMTIMG A VARIAMCS TO MOMICIPAL ZOMIBG CODB SBCTIOa 10.28, EUBOIVISIOB 5 (B) PILE 1578 WBBKBAS, A1 and Libble Hopwood (hereinafter "the applicants") are ownere of the property located at 1205 Lakeview Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and leQally described as followst Lots 12 and 13# Block 1# Maxwell's Addition to Crystal Bay# Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and NBBBBAS, the applicants have applied to the City tor a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section lf.28. Subdivision 5 (D) to permit the construction of a deck to be located 27* ^*'*w*^^*?- lot line and 23* from the side street lot line where a 50^ setback is required from both lot lines. Minnesota t BOH, TLBRBFOBB, BB IT RBSOLVBD by the City Council of Orono, PIBDIBGS 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile 1578. 2, The property Is located in the RR-IB Single Panily Sural Residential Zoning District. 3, The Orono Planning Cosuslsslon reviewed this applicatlcn on August 20, 1990, and on a vote of 5 to 0 recosmended approval or the proposed variance based upon the following findings; a) The orientation of the house on this corner lot and tha s.*ze of the lot ere hardships to the property which would! limit construction within the area of the house proposed for the deck. b) Ro-'neighborIng properties will be impacted by ronstructica o.' the proposed deck with railing and lattice work below extending to grade. Page 1 of 4 TRANSFER ENTERED MM M racnin lii t naucMCOBS .MOV 9 no li \ City of ORONO L°.' CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2871_________ c) The proposed deck will be e positive inprovement to the property. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and r<*cr>*:;mendations of the Planning Comaission* reports by City sLaff, comuents by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health* safety and welfare of the coasnunity. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zening district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions* light* air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not serely serve as a convenience to the applicant* but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COmCLOSlOUS, ORDER AMD COMDXTIOMS Based upon the above fiidings* the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23* Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of an 8* x 41* deck with railings* located 27* from the north street lot line and 23* from the west street lot line where 50* setbacks are normally required* subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall obtain an after-the-fact building permit prior to continuing construction of this deck. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant* but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval* or this variance will expire on that date (September 10* 1991). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code* shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein* and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of 4 City of OROIVO CITY OF • ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ■4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby apees to the Lerms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording c*f this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Iber ^1990 **^ Orono City Council on this 10th day of ilin, CitV'-vClerJc >erty. OwhetTsT ^ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) as. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of September, 1990, by James R. Grab 'k k Dorothy M. Ballin, Mayor k City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. . /va in Notary Public My Coxaission Expires Page 3 of 4 I Mttswp Pttifjvue WAu, fL^ C>f4 TUB ^170 ^1* nj»0. y"TV^ii-r» miAja 1*L- /LaJ A** 1 I I T<^ * I M y; >3 Nftl Tf) L»W? 1 «:!?! .-a?' s!'! «' ■tf'i'*- r/^ 1 rH* »0i • I •^\i .1 f ts% tl -fi ■4•» V4 L. • s>’-it". jii f - ->1-. /jUlJt" , ■' / ' 4T-5 ^ > # J J D tj ceAfiA JKOU'^ It 6VOt{^ / T/K fiPl5fl^ l|L,GjC?/ # ^ / <I/K, r^& Hi«,V\ T- XJ t N OfTOolJo cJ^foeP, \^Oimcr U\6,14T '2/^ ^ j /' t4tTC^fc»V I % f t^ . ’O'JU^1 1 . 1 jiwJ1 ■Hfssl ... db_^ --------rlr—^ .; \VALV--i /t-# ft. <#rup WAUL i)' "jIJ s % OVHvM(a (L/K. UlVtKa jk :«rrr iAof 4a n^K» Vw ^l(^<kV l)NP6^ T“^ 'h I 1 -M >-~, ^•9(pytK\L ■ i» • * •* ; • M «. * —f • • *• ; « t ...-----1 1------» V,.; y—-^- .V J < bi Ci -\ >3 -/ -M ■ki• -;r nS) ^ \ . :;r ■o ~:i J O w VSI ■*—-% cs 5 'S-O • 1 I ^ t - ^ WS r ) I rf cb ' •-?m <j; ; I 1 . y _i fI ^ ^ ! ! I ' ' I ! II i i. t I ' I • . t* * ! • I ; • I I i i I '' I ' ii I ' I ^1'' I •t i0 • I o f^* m.1 >¥ %■V ^1 yot OMPSp <»• jj I *;-,i I. . T -I j<—,/- 'Zto'-e.' "^FIL l TA'-I j ^?6^ \ W/ Vi" PL'(\SDO0 \ o\/e(!- •y*"T^^.'.w.A « ^ 1 ^i*=cJwTwr .w'cAmp \ f ; /A. &AT|4 Liiia, C-Stv'!* 1 i 1 1 _____i _______1i_____________ *V\ \j&^r M AT 45* ^ /^^f\M^'26 piAT. ri^p/A VALt^. > Pi^T. o %■ r«I 5 Z Jf; II 6' \ n«r <5 Q 2 I 4^ lii r1 % I I O’ l4- n r52 o % V-- il’ a y 1 ■ 1z„- O’-.;n .»» /f tn oz V 2. 2. 1? % O ii -' • ; : « I I.. \ —J. J 7- / * I • *> .•• . I V 7 .*•}i' -f/vp» : ••♦.• * dcvfep- w/ ie>^r/\. /AtvrA'-., (^■Wll^lH^CteTAlLll^ \1P.C)66|4->'ir-:g" ^ +• -^P0c>TloS /*5 T^T*- ■ TO fcyrv4 . •• / : »ki p.p 4of>?fr-^ • At C-C-. ^W9oGlh^(i .Olo6, <5^ho • %^ ., V' % • •' •• * ^ * f^ - ,'' • * • . • : , tv * /. • •; . V -*• •I * 4 9 •■i. A /,„ LAONt»?y % % /• • Ji • * »* - ^ ‘ Ji *. > . ... , . »r—------r—rrn • .*• #« ■•• • h * t»»\ - •• n- . J ^ve '/ To:Mayor Callahan and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator From; Subject: %> ^ft\19Q Minnetonka Center for die Ans - 2040 North Shore Drive Variance Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator ^ February 2, 1993 Brief Review of Application The Art Center needs a directional sign at the intersection of Highways 15 and 51 for both students and visitors traveling west on County Road 15 from missing the right turn to the Art Center. The Code classifies signs as accessory structures or uses subordinate to or serving the principal use of structure on the same lot. In order »o install the sign on one of the residential lots at the intersection, it is necessary for applicant to apply for the variance. Keith Erickson, the owner of 2040 North Shore Drive, has given the applicant the approval to install the 8 foot h«gh directional sign at 3 s.f. Applicant has also worked closely with Hennepin County so that the location of the sign will not restrict siting at the intersecting roadways. Please review the enclosed staff memo for more detail and background. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the variance. The enclosed resolution reflects the findings and conditions of the Planning Conimission approval. I A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 5 (A) FILE NO. 1790 WHEREAS, the Minnetonka Center for the Arts (hereinafter "the applicant") sought permission of Keith R. Erickson to install a directional sign on his residential property located at 2040 North Shore Drive within the City of Oror.u and legally described as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of Lot 6. Elbridge S Barnes, 1st Subdivision of Section 10. Township 117, Range 23 thence southeasterly 295.08 feet along the southerly line thereof thence southwesterly at right angles 207.06 feet to the actual point of beginning thence at an angle to the left of 9 degrees 09 minutes to the northerly line of County Road No. 51 thence east along said north line and the same extended to the shore of Lake Minnetonka thence northeasterly along said shore line to its intersection with a line parallel with and 207.6 feet southwesterly from the southwesterly line of said Lot 6 thence northwesterly along said parallel line to begirming ex highway. (P.I.N. 10-117-23 31 (XX)2), Htnnepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit the installation of a directional sign at: 8 feet in height on a residential lot for the purpose of providing direction to the Minnetonka Center for the Arts where the zoning code would not pemiit such use. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1790. The property is located in the LR-IA Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. The Oron.) Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19. 1993 and reconunended the unanimous approval of the proposed variaiKe based upon the following findings: Paee 1 of 4 A. The proposed sign shall meet all required standards for the installation of signs within the City. B.The Hennepin County Department of Transportation has selected the location for the sign at the intersection of County Roads 15 and 51 finding no restrictions on sitinu for vehicular users of the intersection. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning di.strict; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring propert}', would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is neces.sary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping witli the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Compichensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments bv the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CO.NCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Onmo City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit the installation of a directional sign on a residential property located at 2040 North Shore Drive for the benefit of the Minnetonka Center for the Arts, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. Applicant shall obtain an access easement from the owner of the subject property to allow for the regular mainter ince of the sign. Applicant shall obtain a building permit from the City of Orono. The application for a building permit shall include a site plan locating directional sign 5 feet from all lot lines. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application a building {Krtnit within one year of the date of Council app.oval. or mis variance will expire on that date (February 8, 1994). Page 2 of 4 4.Violation of or non-compliance with any of tlie terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically tenr.itiate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 'fhc undersigned applicant and authorized agent of the Minnetonka Center for the Arts and owner of the property have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 8th day of February, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, Citv Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., .Mayor Property Owner (s) Authorized Agent of Minnetonka Center for the Arts STATE 01 • ilNNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of February, WO”* by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Oiono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the Cifv. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199__before me a Notary ’ Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the personfs) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appcare«l_ known to me to lie ‘I* pc*v)n(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed ih»i same as his (their) tree act aiul deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 4 of 4 'i TO:Planning Commission Mem.bers Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:January 11, 1993 SUBJECT:#1790 Minnetonka Center for the Arts - 2040 North Shore Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.02 Definitions - Accessory use of structure. A use or structure subordinate to in serving in the principal use or structure on the same lot and customarily incidental thereto. Section 10.23, Subdivision 5 (B) - Accessory uses, classified as accessory uses/structures. Signs are Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (C) - Allowed setbacks/height. a. Review Exhibit E. The sign is shown at approximately 9' in height. Applicant has advised that sign will be altered to meet maximum allowed height. b.Sign must be located 5' in from street lot line and 5' from side property line. List of Exhibits A 1-2 B C D E Application Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Elevation/Sign Plan Description of Req[uest The Art Center has filed a variance application that would allow a directional sign to be located at 2040 North Shore Drive, a residential lot located at the intersection of 15 and 51. Earlier in '92, the Art Center was advised that placement of such signs were not permitted by code as all signs are considered accessory in support or connected with the principal use on the subject property. The Art Center advised that students and visitors were missing turns and finding themselves all the way into Navarre before realizing they had missed the turn at 51 intersection. In discussing the dilemma with City staff, the applicant was first advised to contact the Hennepin County Highway Department to determine a safe location for signage at the intersection of the County Road. Ralph Martinson, the representative of the Art Center has met with Dave Zetterstrohm of the Hennepin County Highway Department and together developed the site plan for the placement of the sign at the intersection, refer to Exhibit D. A Zoning File #1790 January 11, 1993 Page 2 The sign is a standard directional type sign with a green background and white lettering. The sign shall be located 5' from side and road lot linos as required by code and will create no siting oroblems for the users of the intersection. Per the plans submitted with the application, the sign will be 1 1/2x2' measuring 3 s.f. in area. The City's ordinances do not allow directional signs of this type. Signs that advertise the various churches in the City located along the roadways have been grandfathered in as they have been installed prior to the City's regulations for signage. The many signs that appear around the City advertising garage sales when placed within the road right-of-ways are removed. Residents are encouraged to place these informational signs on adjacent pj^ivate properties. These are temporary informational signs and are removed as soon as the garage sales are completed. Signs such as the directional sign requested in this application are not addressed in the code and can only be allowed via appropriate variance approvals. Hardship Statement Refer to Exhibit A-1. Issues for Consideration 1.Are the hardships presented by the applicant unique - will there be similar requests if this variance is approved? 2. Is the Minnetonka Center for the Arts a unique use? 3.Should the Code be amended to allow directional signs for similar uses or is it appropriate to address each request through a variance review. • If approved, the applicant shall be advised to obtain the necessary access easement to allow for regular maintenance of sign. The owner of the property, Keith Erickson, shall be required to ex6cute th© approval resolution. Ihe applicauu will also ^ responsible fo'' obtaining a building permit. V' CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200 UO After-the-Fact Fees (Double application f 1 •• r ♦ • • PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 2040 North Shore Drive Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 10-117*25-51-0002 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired _____________________(month/year) •i I (do)(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. nj rrw Present use of property: _ _residential _ _other(specif/^^ ^ Zoning District:_________________________ rrr/ nr nr^iunuJi I I ui i/t\unU CTfiA^rc rfCC7rcI xtfnixuL. ut t A wv w 175. 1 75. !>.IV AfCEJpr-7,VAVA ’ YOU kvVi Ml/. I. APPLICANT Phone (home)12/17. Name Minnetonk.'i Center For The Arts Phone (work) 473-7361 Address:2240 North Shore Drive City: Orono Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Keith R. Erickson Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: 2040 North Shore Drive City: Otono Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 100.00 Describe request in detail: Install a white on green directional sign for Minnetonka Center ('07 me Arts (.per drawing) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) 1 HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements;';_ _ _ _ Ihts sign will provide direction to stiiJoats coming from the nertn on Count .' iCi. To ±l A \r.. #1 ^(attach additional sh^ejfs if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: 1. 2. Co ipleted Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271) , 3, _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4, Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8is"xll" for reproduction). 5, Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 0Ji"xll"). 6, Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy BJi^xll"). 7, _As an addendiun to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8._ _^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if—<^he— information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees tir-pay. addLtiowed. fees-(staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or—oon-s u 1 ta n t- .eocpen » d S inourfgd- in review and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ The owner, hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Coinmission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature See attached copy'_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE lZ/li/9ZBATCH 001 HEmEPin COUNTY PROPERTY INroRMATIOfi SYSTEM PROPERTY OliNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI^35^01 PAGE 1 PROP ADDR OI#IER NAME TAXPAYER NAflE/ADOR 30 10-117-25 51 0001 02010 SHORELINE DR GEORGE r ROVEGNO JR A HIFE GEORGE r ROVEGNO 2010 SHORELINE DRIVE NAY2ATA HN 5S391 50 10-117-23 51 0002 020^0 NORTH SHORE DR K « L ERICKSON KEITH R ERICKSON 20^#0 NORTH SIK?RE DR MAYZATA rtJ 553«1 30 10-117-23 31 0005 02060 NORTH SHORE DR L G GODFREY A N J GODFREY LYLE G A NORMA J GODFREY 2060 NORTH SHORE PR NAY7ATA TW 5S391 PROP ADDR OltlER NAT€ TAXPAYER NA»€/ADDR PROP ADDR OIPIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAIS/ADOR 38 10-117-23 31 000^ 02000 NORTH SHORE DR CAROL A LA QUEY CAROL A lA QUEY 2080 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0007 01360 RAILROAD AVE TIMOTHY J PATTRIN SR TIMOTHY JON PATTRIN SR 1360 RAILROAD AVE CRYSTAL BAT ftl 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0005 01390 RAILROAD AVE OLAl HANSON ETAL OLAI HANSON BOX 129 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 30 10-117-23 31 0000 02055 SPATES AVE MARIETTA H ANDERSON MARIETTA H ANDERSON 2055 SPATES AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 30 10-117-23 31 0006 01300 RAILROAD AVE FLORENCE K GOLDEN FLORENCE K GOLDEN rO POX 172 CRYSTAL BAY Ttl 55323 30 10-117-23 39 0001 01<«25 BAY RIDGE RO ROY E AHERN ROY E aiier;i 1925 BAY RIDGE RD HAYZATA MN 55391 T0T41 BATCH 001 C000« \ ( 1 CtRTirV THAT THt TACTS PEPRESEHTtO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION UT INEORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEfRJEPlN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OE PROPERTY.TAXATION, TO Tl'i; BEST OF MV KNONIEOGE ANO BELIEFELIEF. / / OATEW^/^-f^ r tP A 14 ; <5 • • (MTIMT < ;inr 1 i3) JZ a '(7^5) a ^X7Q) H V ft r V »o <40 1 H"* '*. "(71) ^ , '!® Xi ^ ' £f#l <46v~> T iX •< UL JiT a '♦O —' ^ — — , I '<0rSTiLl " (39) **(1?) ^ ji '0 '*0a 2.'<35) a » '**a" (57) " 4 <40 N 140**“^ '(56) **A.iw..? a' ^ ’**a l»0 ' v ’ » '<«~ ('V,../ CRrSlAi ^4? $il \ ) C-* f( I6)|v' ] r» E\ (in ( 100) ' ■-.J2—n \A11• 4:k //> 1 ■^"5•C> : >vN fn \ i 4 F > -«*•.• ■ ir a 5 -1 0 «»• /. y \ p D -lA ii :v % ?•z. !H -c 0 » r> r' r- T*. 11* '0 '\\ ':• C.» 24-" ■;!» ,s K, 1#' 4 ^ - f* r . - ^ I #• •• / I I • V ^W\ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJEC1: Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembcrs Ron Moorse. City Administrator Steplien Wccknian. On-site Systems Manager Februarv 2, 1993 % % % X'> /S/1791 Blake Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street. Variance - Public Hearing Discussion of Application The applicant requests approval of side lot line variances in order to construct additions to an existing residence. Two adjacent parcels, 324 and 332 Westlake Street, are owned by the applicant who would like to combine the lots and construct an addition which would combine two existing residences to form a single dwelling. The proposed remodel includes a front porch addition on the house to the south of approximately 50 s.f. which would lie within the substandard side yard setback. The addition of basement is proposed on the north house, which currently has a crawl space only. The proposed basement will result in no additional hardcover within the setback area. A tower is also proposed which would attach the two structures. The tower would not encroach into the setback areas and meets the 30 ’ h ''mitation. The proposed renovation would result in the following: Approximately 50 s.f. of hardcover would be added within the side yard setback area. The maximum encroachment into the side yard setbacks will remain the same, 20.1 ’ nonh side lot line and 12.7 ’ for the south side lot line. The hardcover, including all proposed changes, is well below the required percentages with the exceotion of the 0-75 ’ zone which has one existing shed covering approximately 67 s.f. Lot coverage for the combined parcel is approximately 27c. Due to the anticipated combination of these parcels, the applicant has already been assessed for one sewer unit. Planning Commi.ssion Recommendation The Planning Commission unanimously approved the variance application with the following conditions: I 2. The two parcels, 324 and 332 Westlake Street, must be legally combined prior to the ’ssuance of a pemiit. This residence must be hiH)ked up to the Cit) sewer as soon as possible and before new construction is occupied. Please review the Planning Commission packet for further detail. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions set fonh in the Planning Commissii>n’s recommendation. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1791 WHEREAS, Blake Bichanich (hereinafter "the applicant")^ is owner of the property located at 332 Westlake Street within the City of Orono (he-einafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 3 and 4 Albee’s Long Lake Addition. Hennepin County, and That part of Government Un 1, Section 26, Township 118, Range 23, lying East of a line drawn parallel to and 675 feet East of, measured at right angles to. the West Ime of said Section 26 and West of the extension south of the most Westerly line of Un 1. A .^ itor s Subdivision Number 291. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zonine Ccxle Section 10.23. Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of additions to his where (he required side yard setback is 30 NOW, THEREFORK. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1791. 2. 3. Tlie property is located in the LR-IA, Ukeshore Residential Zoning District. The Orono IManmng Commission reviewed this application on January 19. 1993, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based on the following findings: Page 1 of 5 A.A combination of the two parcels will bring the property close to conforming to 2 acre minimum requirement. B. The narrow lots severely restrict development on the combined parcels. C.The maximum encroachment into the side yard sefback area will lemain the same and hardcover additions within the substandard setback will be limited to 50 s.f. in area. D . The hardcover including all proposed changes is well below the required percentages in all but the 0-75 ’ zone, which will not be intensified. E. Lot coverage for the combined parcel is approximately 2%. 4.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserx^e a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Cixle a.nd Comprehensive Plan ot the City. CONCLISIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based uptui one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B> to permit the construction of additions to the existing home subject to the following conditions: I. Two parcels. 324 and 332 Westlake Street, must be legally combined prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed construction. Page 2 of 5 2. 3. 4. 5. The residence must be connected to the municipal sewer prior to the final inspection by the City inspector of the new construction. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or tliis variance will expire on that date (February 8, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constiuite a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically lermmate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8lh day of February, 1993. A'nKST Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owncr(s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of February, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. 6c. Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the Citv. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199__before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrunient, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199__before me a Notary Public withinand for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 5 of 5 d N /,'Af 0/ See. tt W S/y of ^/y/y^e X044. / T\\^ KZ^ flxj^jnq Legal noRcript:ion 1.0^ 1; ""^ti;n''2'!?^,Uohip'1^^,''R;!^“™^ 'Twr*? Gover.„„ont °t' "oasurod „, r lnht .^L?3: J.V’” P^rafeat Kant ot/„oasu«d at rlnl'^T ?^ '=''"'^ -it^w^paranertTand West of the oxtonsl..ii south of the most WestPrlv''? ”‘^®*^f^?"® ®'^<^tton 26 and Number 291, Hennepin County, Minnosotn.” ' ' ^ ^ ''Auditor’s Subdivision the »orth®of”thrnbove^I™cribe^U.ro^^ 'j"''''® <^fi''eway serving a paroel toprovoraentp or encronchmonts. ^ Perty. Tt does not p^Jrport to show any other im- f> : Iron mnrkijr Renrinqs shov.n are based on an assumed datum. Ofifltffl Pnnu y CITYOFORONO ^ SIT t PLAN GRADING PLAN ^API>nOVEO 1 1 Arn’.OVHO WITH REVISIONS - iPV! 1 DISAPRim^ ii'i^____s^SLdiAli To:Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Stephen V'/eckman, On-Site Systems Manager Date:January 13, 1993 Stibject:#1791 Blake Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential, 2 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B) - Side yard setback. Existing Proposed South side lot line. 12.7' 12.7' North side lot line 20.1' 20.1' List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - Application property Owners List Plat Map Existing Survey Survey with Proposed Addition Proposed Floor Plan ~ Lower Level Proposed Floor Plan - Main Level West Elevation East Elevation Variance Request Description of Request The applicant requests approval of side lot order to construct additions to an existing residence. Two oarcels 324 and 332 Westlake Street, are owned by the applicant^who would like to combine the lots and addition which would combine two existing residences to form » stn^le SwelUng. The proposed remodel of 'he^ouse to the south i^^iif^he ^sTs\/n°dafd ^3^^'^rard^S7^Ti.^e ajd& of a S:s^.Vnrwut^^esuirtr^/o a^tional u1-i:t^ih" t^h? t-^^s-Ltures. ^ T^heTo.^ ^Jo^^d^f f rSacE: Into the setback areas and meets the 30- height limitation. Zoning File ttl791 January 13, 1993 Page 2 The proposed renovation would result in the following: Approximately 50 square feet of hardcover would be added within the side yard setback area. The maximum encroachment into the side yard setbacks will remain the same. The hardcover, including all proposed changes, is well below the required percentages with the exception in the 0-75' zone which has one existing shed covering approximately 67 s.f. Lot coverage for the combined parcel is at approximately 2%. Due to the anticipated combination of these parcels, the applicant has already been assessed for one sewer unit. Hardship Statement The applicant's hardship is the long and narrow nature of the lots. The combination of these two lots will result in a 100.28' lot width while the zoning district requires a minimum of 2C0' . Due to the 30' side yard setbacks, the allowable building envelope is very restrictive at 40' wide. The proposed changes result in no further encroachment into the side yard setback area, as well as the fact that most cf the addition would meet the 30' side yard setback. The changes add only slightly to the lot coverage in the setback area and should not be a significant detriment compared to the benefit of combining the parcels and renovating the residence. Isv fn'1 " •• •« CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION 1 jy . Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varianc®)/ Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) r-TTy nr nonijnWS » I v/l l/liuitu LT’AfMjrc lienI Ui I a rrc f T-rnirjnnnAX i/VV/VV 01 UUIt nr i a VV ruerk' f i. } 7^J. I v\ PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 32*^ ^ 3)^2. 'vJ. I— uECilPT-THAllK rOL U261610 COOl r<0l T. 05- n7- -LZ Z3. Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) c ln--2.n -2-^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required surv^. Date Property Acquired ^ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) <" /•? f I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential _ _other(specify) Zoning District: OCj\1T IA _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Phone (home) name AK/IC44 Address: 332. (-.-N UaujU. ‘*3t. _ _ _ Phone (wor)c) ^A'L'iOLoO City: LAs<i^ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) N£une Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION CP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: ATT«\d>H£D Q(\J VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front X Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: I (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS of fche following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 8. Completed Application Form _Certified Property Owners List of owners w’thin 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department ot Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). _ _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J5"xll" for reproduction). _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5"xll"). _ _SJcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"), 7 •As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Ipfomurtion has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acicowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature A?(A_________Date _______ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccanmission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J .7 i DATAPRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. •You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First Middle ,ast Address V,mio City State Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. Si'ghature HARDCGVE?.zi—ACA IONS: (CIHCLH CNs) 7z-izQ' CJ'.ISTu'IG Hap -dccvh ?. i:i ICM£ 250-SGQ' 5GQ-1GC0' A. Hcush 3. GaRAGc C. DrIVcHAY D. Sidewalk £. Patio/ UEc:< f.Undscape areas UNDERLAIN SY 1 . plastic SHEETING Q. Other LENGTH X X X - X X X X X _ X _ X X WIDTH 7. i S.r. S.r s.r S. r - S.r. S.r. S.r . S.P S.r. S..=^. S.r. S .F. S.r. S.r. S.F. S.r. - S.F. Total Hardcover in acne - Total pRCPERr/' Area in Zone T| 4 ITL_IZ5H i:el S • F • S* r . 1 Tm «X iCO •• •••• • • 4• m ••#***^ • • •• HARDCaVE?. CALCl'LA7:0!i KGEKSHE l;I .r.i 0aSTIMG H a SCCGYE?. I.'I iCME ... House •33? U>.WMt£. •334 O. lA\dC. TWcJt L1mv< H« G a RAG c c. D riyehay D. Sidewalk £. Patio / D eck p.Landscape ARE.AS UNDERLAIN BY • . PL-ASTIC SHEETING 3. O ther LENGTH X X X X X .. X X - X X X WIDTH \.oo ^Z.TAM^iK^(a W/kU- _ • Total H ardcover in Zone Total pROPSRrr A rea in icne • • ^ S7/0.^/> _-r i) :eo -EuO' ego • -lOCQ' • S.F. =S.r. • • • S.F. = -ZBCo , S.F. S3 S. F1 » -3^a S ■ ^ 1 = 100^s.r#• • S.F. * 'Z.OA S.R. S.F. S • • =. i^sns StF. •S.F. S.F. • S.F. SBI S.F. - 2 S3. fi5 S.F. -27'OXa.S.F. 17 <00 S.F. Y -nn ■ "ZLS—- •l A I Yo 19 • HARDC3VE?. CALCjL'\TiG:i '(Gr.KShci S£T3AC:< zcNc: (CIF.CLI CMS) 0-75' 7: &(iSTING H a£cc:vs ". in Icnh -250' (^50^^ 5CQ-1GCG' A. HcUSc 3. Ga HAG c c. Dsr/rwAY D. Sid £H al:< e. Patio / Dec:< F. Landscape ARS.AS UNDERLA IN 3Y • . PL.ASTIC SHEETING a. O ther X length X X X \n - X Vr% X X X X X • I A X WIDTH S»r I S,r S> r • S.r S.r. ____S . r • -Z-.rOCJ s.r. s.r. S.r. S.r. S.r. S..= S • r • Total K a.tcc:ve .t i:i ic:iE 2,Ci>0 -ggpoo^ S.?Total ."acps.Trf A aea in asms 7'S. t)Ogi X :co - _ii2 f «« « t f u ‘>1 s.r. S.F. .♦ S.r. S.F. S.F.Tj S.F. m3 A 2..^00 4i 3 % •M»« CUM ••V 9 r:-.i ^•(ISTI.'IG HAaCCCVE.-. in iCNH A. House B, GaKAGc c. Drivehay D. Sidewalk £. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape ARE.AS UNDERLAIN = Y PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other VA LENGTH X X X X m VA _ X X X X X X X WIDTH Total Hardcsv 'r in acne 2SH S.r _ S.F. Total pRCPERr.' Area in acne Tj ___-r fTi ‘^SOd.— X ica S.F. S. FI S.F. S.F S.F. S. FI S.F. S. p # S.r* S.r S» r • S.r S.“. S.r S.F S.F ■' 1 ■'ti A I /O \H c/ /Q 19 mm mm • • TSB^DG Architecture • Engineering • Interiors * Planning • Design Energy Consultation • Construction Management • Design/Build Denver. CO Dulutn. MN l^rvieapoUt. MN Roc^estef MN Rapid Cify. SO Siouv Fans. SO Gaiette. VYY Shendaa.. WY August 22, 1989 ri ' I J w hi Mr. Blake Bichanich 332 Westlake Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Re: Bichanich Residence 332 Westlake Street Long Laxe, Minnesota At your request, I have reviewed the plans of your proposed addition in the City of Orono specifying the beams, headers, etc. I also reviewed the adequacy of the existing foundation and foundation wall. The existing 12“ concrete block wall and footing are of adequate size and strength to support the additional load of your proposed addition. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, TSP/ADG StructurcUyEngineer/StructurcUyEngineer VMi/hnesota Reg. No. 15847 =C'i.ii Cpv'.'*'.'- r Actor 7301 Ohms L*nt. Sutt A80. MmreapolX, MN S543S (612) ♦ (6l2) KJO-1507 RUN DATEDATCH OOSPROP ADOR d'lMER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADOR OliriER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OUIIER NAME TAXPAYER NArtE/AOUR PROP ADPR Olf»4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAftt/AOOR PROP ADOR OUriER r4AME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR MEmEPIN COUT4TY PROPERTY INEORMATIOfJ SYSTEM PROPERTY OILERS LIST50 05-117-25 25 0008058(»5 OAYSIOE RO OAK DIANISoDAVID OlAfll;, 579 N E PLANTATION RO l4lON STUART EL 5<4^^0 58 05-117-25 25 0011 0052<i ME5TLAKE ST C E tllLlER ETAl BLAKE M BICMANICH 524 MESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55556 38 05-117-25 25 0014 00548 MESTLAKE ST R D MARSH A P A MARSH RODERIC B MARSH A PAIRICIA A MARSH 54P MESTLAKE ST LOI4G LAKE Mf4 55556 50 05-117-25 25 0021 00500 ITESfLAKE ST G S PERL A B J PERL GREGG S A BETTE J PERL 504 M LAKE ST LONG LAKE m 55556 58 05-117-25 25 0024 00541 MESTLAKE ST I E A M K BERGSAGCL IRVIN E DERGSAGEL PO BOX 149 HAY2ATA m 55591 50 05-117-25 25 000905045 BAY310E RO C J MEZZENGA A E K ftEZZENGA CHRISTOPH-fR/EUGENIA MEZZEriGA 50<>5 BAYSIOF ROAD LONG LAKE MT4 55556 58 05-117-25 23 0012 00552 MESTLAKE ST F E LOMRY ETAL 8LAKE M 8ICHANICH 552 MESTLAKE L0f4G LAKE NN ST 55556 38 05-117-23 23 0015 00356 MESTLAKE ST E C ANDER50f4 ETAL EOMARO AfiPERSON 556 MESTLAKE ST L0t4G LAKE M»4 55556 38 05-117-25 25 0022 003^5 MESTLAKE ST I E A M K DERGSAGEL IRVIN E BCRGSAGEL PO BOX 144 MAY2ATA m 55591 58 05-117 25 23 0025 00544 MESTLAKE ST E T ANDERSON AML RICKETT EDNA T ANDERSON 544 M LAKE ST LOtJG LAT;E m 55556 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 758 05-117-25 25 001000056 ADDRESS Ur4ASSIGNED 0 A K OIANIS DAVID tlAN^S574 me PLANVATION RO f410N STUART EL 5440^ •4 58 05-117-23 23 0013 0C540 MESTLAKE ST C STENOERSON A C HARRER CARL STENOERSON 3112 IW)DLAMN AVE MAYZATA MT4 55541 J ff)0016 ST 38 05-117-23 23 00564 MESTLAKE liALLACE H PAASCH H N PAASCH 564 MEST LAKE ST LONG LAKE MT4 55556 f { 9. i i 58 05-1)7-23 23 0023 00058 ADDRESS UMASSIGNEO I E A M K DERGSAGEL IRVIN E DERGSAGEL PO BOX 144 MAYZATA m 55591 I TOTAL BATCH 005 00014 a > Hn Tt Oo V/4 o ♦ >S ^ / C3 H n < n HH O m <Ti rrf “n *T3 o o a HI-n -n ni a nS H a m -< X rn :o rn c*) -♦5^ m »-< * 3 *>r- ^ -4 m ri M X o a o *» S3 = -^ 2 0 rnO <x H* 2 "n O S H t» O r> a -f 2 01 > •H a»-» m Q ^ 2 a m -< HIO -< ma o >a a > Ei ■ s !J '*/ • •♦ > >H f\»N Mo X nO fS> Xm fta HU Z a a -« m *n a a a m 9 5 ;i 2 a f OK5 H > C/1-< c/1 -4m3 I |5 a Q» W4 1/1 O f 35 30 \ 4 5/ 1 N ^ ?0) •457 2 \ P 457 < 1 ^\3 ' . 1(39, hi *. 11 10 •. -jl ns) » 13. ; I? (ne) 15 MiDFyg^ 10 9 6 'to 9 8 e ^ P 1 * ' '0 ^4^? 2n.5 0 i s in rtJ 5 'el^9) TIT? •0 (?6)i ^► :a :i5.i •M?8) T7T? It X B K B A i<3 5 *8 iyn'“ M K S B /,13 5 '5(27) 13 . r* * mSr T 2»3 5 , 14• n - ; iV ) / ^ *r n ■'» ■ ‘ ’ ‘a f *.• • • •' • ;•• V' r4 ' ' v' i fi : .' • ' . ' ■ *. *f • •I , ' Cv .• • ' , *i- . . ;.v . . \ *;t: ■. . f'iL- .. U • "•• • <• .» .*v5 r ■ .*'. • * ■ •, . . ,■ ■'%'•■ •■•; '4«' . • . •• . • . : %' fp. I. * • ■ ; , • * I- % • • 529.90 /"AO TO*r id i<\) Shed-^ 5V; n 6 . 70 0,7 ------ •s ^1 0^‘ 1^ RETAIN/NS ^ALL ZG» M !12 L>--/O/. /eL ^____ nM 0^ 9<3.S o. z'-'V) i ^ J M uJirc FenceA 0 fa .<¥ C/ IV) /2.5 0^ •o4d' porch Founc/o -h/'or) \« !CI X -n .^3 54i 3 2. # ^4 J ^0' '-^3 0 ^/e /-SO^ f..t. it .# mI m -------C 1 V 1 \L • n \ ^1 \ r ____a ; * I►' 11 11{1 \ti0011;=1 C \ r nv--i.i » 1i,—— ---------- i:rrn ;fef^ i;;.! i’.iMi:i'i;^ trcrxr ^-------- — T T J"T^ ' '-Tr-Hn!^ r ® r_i. 5r -----r-T' rr t i.i,-L:- h------rasLJ il-*-J ^v»— ' ' X-i-4 i..------ iiriin^Gn?;i75^ i± '• t • • - ' ‘ ' ‘ IIX ■ ^ ’ til ~ IfeiX t 3TXi-' *•-•1 \L._J____Ji l/[jEsr bi-^(^tidaj \ -----r* ,— ,• > •• • pr AM.' c i:cr,| ICCT I cwn wo sdiscs'Tt pisc-s cl" prop6r'‘ty (32t» i* 332 W. Lsk'S St^) w'i'th ^xiitin'3 |-oo*^s *cn each. One serves as cur pn'fnary rea-!dense and the ether aa cur hcusl and aeaacnal atorage area. Mv intent, if I receive this 3.^ requested, is to legally confine the t.vo pr-coerties end then to -unn-^rthe exiatino structurea with an addition. Existing setbacks are ^"2’.'7"feet cn the south siue and 20.1 feet on the north side. I do Q2I need to chance these aetbaciis as all of the work fall- brjtween thejs exiStin^ conditions. In fact, once the lots are ccxnbined, most of the addition will meet the 30' sidevard setback of the newer ordinances passed since the or'icinal structures were built. The hardship I face is that the lots are very narrow and the new sidevard setback reauirements of 30' make it inposaible to build uccn them. i.e. a 5C' 1 o’ with 30' sidevard setback leaves a negative 10' for’ construction. Ey combining the properties I create a 100' wide lot. but the 30' setbacks spa 2till excessive and the existing houses still do not comp.v. . am th^-Ifore askinc for a sidevard setback variance to leave the setbacks as they presently -xist, which met the recuirements at the time the houses '.•/ere built. Thank you for 3ur help i' this matter. Elake Bichanich BB/hks i mtiBi <% >> SMS\ To: From: Date; Mayor Callahan and Orono City Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building Sc Zoning Administrator February 4, 1993 r. % / Of a '' Subject: #1792 Donald R. Gronbcrg. 110 Leaf Street - Variances - Resolution l ist of Exhibits M - Moorse Letter Brief Review of Application The applicant seeks lot area and setback variances to construct a residence on the .69 acre property subject to RR-IB, 2-acre rural development standards. Based on Council’s earlier decision to only require a 25’ right-of-way dedication from the applicant, the following area and hardcover facts are confinned: 1. Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) - Lot area variance. Required = 87.120 s.f. or 2 acres Gross area = 42,390 s.f. or .97 acres Total area exclusive of pond and dry buildable area to east of pond — 34,890 s.f. or .8 acres Net area exclusive of road right-of-way at 25’ width = 30,390 s.f. or .69 acres Variance = 56,730 s.f. oi 65% 2. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L-1 & 2) - Hardcover variances. A. 0-75’ setback area = 16,200 s.f. Allowed = 0 Proposed * 1,402 s.f. or 8.05% B. 75-250’ setback area = 14,190 s.f. Allowed = ".548 s.f. or 25% Proposed = 3,542 s.f. or 24.96% No variance required 3. Section 10.03, Subti 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Allowed = 4.559 s f. or 15% Propt)scd »= 3,734 f or 12.3% No variance required (Now based on 30,390 s.f.) Zoning File ^1792 February 4, 1993 Page 2 The area variance portion of the application was not of major concern since the City had included the parcel within the Stubbs Bay Sewer District and granted a reduction in the principal amount of an assessment based on the unique findings and history of applicant’s ownership of the property (review Exhibit L). The major concern was the setback from the protected tributary', The Planning Commission was asked to consider specific issues surrounding the variance setback from the tributary. Members were asked to consider the size of the residence and compare with residences on adjacent lots. In a survey of the developed lots adjacent to the tributary, the average setback was 73’ when prior to the Shoreland Regulations of 1992 the setback would have ^en 26’. When applicant was questioned as to the size of the structu;^, Gronberg advised that the adjacent neighbors were also proposing major additions to their residences that will probably require similar variances. This was also confirmed by a neighbor in support of Gronberg ’s application who advised that now that sewer was available to these properties, the residents were planning to proceed with major improvements of their residences. The Planning Commission recommendation was greatly influenced by applicant’s statements related to the pond level and that pond has been artificially created by a dam installed by developer over 30 years ago. Gronberg noted if creek existed as it did prior to the dam, the width of the creek was no more than 3’ to 4’ and would have been located at the mid-point of the pond width that intersects property along the east (refer to Exhibit E) He noted that strictures would meet required 75’ setback. Staff would agree the dam was not installed as a flood control structure. The City never obtained easements over structure or ponding area. The open water area now provides the positive function of providing a sediment trap ridding the southern flow from large sediment before it enters into the Stubbs Bay watershed. The reality is that the dam will never be removed because homeowners will never willing diminish their property values. The pond has existed for over 30 years and the majority of the surrounding lots developed under ru.al .standards. The applicant’s hardships stated in his addendum. Exhibit B, are reviewed on Page 4 of the enclosed staff memo. Please review the enclosed packet of information prepared for the Planning Commission for more background and detail on the variance application. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the area and setback from the protected tributary requiring also approval of hardcover variances within the 0-75’ setback area. Options of Action To approve the application as set forth in the enclosed approval resolution based on the Planning Commission ’s recommendation. Note that the original findings developed by staff for Resolution No. 31^*^ granting a reduction of a principal amount of assessment has been repeated as necessary findings in the granting of the area variance. As for the variaiKC setback front the tributary, staff has included the hardships presented by applicant and accepted by the Planning Zoning File H1192 February 4, 1993 Page 3 Commission. OR Table application providing applicant additional time to amend the proposal. Council may consider providing directives to applicant on the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. Need to reduce building footprint. Would you approve of any encroachment of the 0-75 ’ setback area? Would you consider setback variance to either street or north side? Would Council grant setback variances at the same time Council is asked to consider an area variance? Does the history of the zoning of the property as set forth in Resolution No.3198 and applicant’s addendum influence your decision? A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C-1) AND (L-1) FILE NO. 1792 WHEREAS, Donald R. Gronbe.-g (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 110 Leaf Street within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 744, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); anr' WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.28. Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C-1) and (L- 1) to permit the construction of a residence on a property that contains 30.390 s.f. or .69 acres where 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres is required, the structure shall be set 50 ’ from a protected tributary where a 75 ’ setback is required. The encroachment of the 75 ’ setback area will result in 1,402 s.f. or 8.65% hardcover within the 0-75 ’ setback area where no such hardcover is allowed. Minnesota: 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FCSDLNGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1792. The propeny is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19, 1993 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings; A. Area Variance. TT? andings are as follows: Page 1 of 6 8) The property is a vacant lot containing approximately .69 acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of roadways and pond areas. The lot was created as part of RLS No. 744 in March 1958, and met the 25,000 s.f./120 ’ area and width standards then in effect. Ordinance No. 22, adopted 10/12/59, established a minimum building lot size of one acre and 140 ’ minimum width at the building line. That Code allowed the City Council to grant variances for substandard lots in single separate ownership. The property continued its status as a substandard lot with the 1967 rezoning to R-IC, one acre single family residential. The lot became even more substandard when the area was rezoned to RR-IB in 1975, requiring two acres and 200’ width. Prior to 1975, substandard lots of similar size and character were granted building permits for construction of single family residences without variance approval in the Cygnet/Leaf neighborhood in which the property is located. Lot area and width variances were granted for similarly situated lots in the Cygnet/Leaf neighborhood after the 1975 rezoning to two acre lot standards. The property has been in single separate ownership by the current owner since 1959. On November 9. 1992 the City agreed to reduce the principal amount of an $18,880 sewer assessment finding the assessment an unfair burden to the property owner on the basis that as a lot in single separate ownership, it likely would have been allowed to be developed with a single family residence as recently as six months prior to adoption of the assessment roll, and therefore the benefit Page 2 of 6 4. to the property is no greater than the $11,400 benefit to other developed lots in the neighborhood. Tributar)' setback and hardcover variance within the 0-75’ setback area. The findings are as follows: 1) Environmental regulations have gradually reduced the potential building area of the lot. Ordinance No. 63 in April 1964 e.xcluded wetlands from the d:y buildable area calculation. Ordinance No. 179 adopted in September 1975 required a 26’ structure setback from the pond. The • Shoreland Regulations adopted in 1992 required a 75’ structural setback from the pond if the lot is sewered. 100’ if it is not sewered. 2) Until the City Council adopted the Shoreland Regulations in February 1992. a house could have b<^'*n constructed on the property meeting all state septic system design ana setback requirements and would have met all Orono zoning code requirements except for lot standard requirements. 3) Level of pond or adjacent tributary is determined by the existence and maintenance of dam that was specifically designed for the purpose of creating a ponding area. 4) Current proposal will minimize need for excavation and will take advantage of existing contours. 5) Increase runoff from the proposed construction will not run directly into the pond but drain first to vest along grassed route that eventually would reach the pond. 6) The property consists of unique topographic features that Include the creek that intersects along the east side of the property creating a dr> buildable island to the east side of creek. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor Paae 3 of 6 pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 10.56. Subdivision 16 (C-1) and (L-1) to permit the construction of a new residence on the property requiring a 56,730 s.f. or 65% area variance, 25 ’ or 33.3% tributary setback variance and 1,402 s.f. or 8.65% hardcover within the 0-75 ’ setback area, subject to the following conditions; 1.Based on a prior agreement with the City of Orono, applicant shall grant a road and utility easement at a 25 ’ width for Leaf Street and a 10 ’ wide drainage and utility easement to the east side of the newly defined street lot line. These easements must be fully executed and in a form suitable for filing and submitted to the City at the time of the filing of the building permit for new construction. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 8, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Pace 4 of 6 4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby aerees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and 4,urn pro^)?’^''"* resolution in the Chain of Title 0/the held on the Sth'^dtTot ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPLN ) c K instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th dav of Oro Hallin, Mayor anS Citraei o, £hiS of the City”' “ eorporation and said instmment was executed on Notary Public Page 5 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged tliat he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On ihi:day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the persun(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknuwledg'ul that he (they) e.xecuied the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 6 TO; DATE: / rj. Planning CoTimission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator January 12, 1993 SUBJECT: #1792 Donald R. Gronberg, 110 Leaf Street Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (Al). Property is sewered, lot width need only meet 80% of the required width standard. Required = 144' or 30% Existing = 180' Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B). Lot area variance. Required = 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres Gross area = 42,390 s.f. or .97 acres Total area exclusive of pond and dry buildable area to east of pond = 34,890 s.f. or .8 acres Net area exclusive of road right-cf-way at a 25' width = 30,390 s.f. or .69 acres Net area exclusive of right-of-way at 30' » 29,490 s.f. or .68 acres Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) . Shoreland setback from protected tributary for sewered property. Required ■ 75' Proposed » 50' Variance ■ 25' or 33.3% Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L 1 & 2). Hardcover variances. A. 0-75' setback area « 16,200 s.f. Allowed » 0 s.f. Proposed » 1,402 s.f. or 8.65% B. 75-250' setback area Allowed = 3,548 s.f. or 25% Proposed » 3,542 s.f. or 24.96% (14,190 S.f. total area with right-of-way at 25%) Allowed = 3,323 s.f. or 25% Proposed » 3,462 s.f. or 26% (Total area 13,290 s.f. with right-of-way at 30') Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C). Lot coverage s.f. with right-of-way at 30'). Allowed - 4,424 s.f. or 15% Proposed ■ 3,734 s.f. or 12.6% (Based on 29,490 Zoning File #1792 January 12, 1993 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicant's Addendum C - Property Owner's List D - Plat Map E - Survey/Proposed Site Plan F - Building Envelope Prior to Shoreland Regulations G - Cygnet Pl-^ce/Leaf Street Neighborhood H - Neighbor's Acknowledgment Forms and Approval Letters I - Hardcover Fr.ct Sheets J - Building Envelope Per Shoreland Regulations K - Elevation I- - Resolution Approving Sewer to the Property (Resolution #3198) History of Property The lot was created in March of 1958 with the approval of RLS No. 744. The lot at that time met the 25,000 s.f. area and 120' lot width standards. The lot became substandard in 1959. The area standard was increased to 1 acre. Similar sized lots in the area were allowed to be built on without variances unt'l 1975 when the area was rezoned to 2 acres. Two undeveloped lots were developed since 1975. Both were granted variances to rural standards. The property at 190 Cygnet Place at .65 acres was approved in 1977 and the property at 20 Cygnet Place at 1.37 acres was approved in 1988. Refer to Exhibit G. Of the total developed 24 lots, the average lot size is 1.02 acres and range in size from 0.60 acres to 2.15 acres. Description of Request The subject property was included within the recent Stubbs Bay Sewer project and has been assessed a single sewer unit. The applicant now seeks an area variance, a setback variance from the protected tributary and hardcover variance within the 0 75' setback area to construct the proposed residence. Prior to the Shoreland Regulations, the setback from the tributary would have been 26'. Review Exhibit F, the building envelope defined at a 26' setback from the tributary and a 25' road dedication defines an adequate building ei.velope for residential development. With the new Shoreland Regulations, the building envelope shown in Exhibit J is severely impacted. The Public Works Director has asked for a 30' dedication for Leaf Street. If the 30' easement is approved, applicant would also be seeking a street setback variance. Zoning File #1792 January 12, 1993 Page 3 The applicant's addendum, Exhibit B, notes that the existing homes to the north and south of the subject property are located at approximately the same street setback. Gronberg also notes that the existing structures appear to be 50+ or from the edge of the protected tributary. These setbacks were conforming prior to the Shoreland Regulation. The DNR has advised that they would not need to review the proposed setback variance as the property is sewered and the DNR setback standard is 50' for all structures from a protected tributary. Issues for Consideration A. B. C. D. E. Refer to Exhibit J, Can a residence be constructed on the property meeting all required setbacks - note size of residence structures on adjacent lots? Whut is the impact of precedent setting as it relates to variance to a new ordinance? The proposed structure appears to be twice the size of the homes on the adjacent lots in the immediate neighborhood - should applicant be asked to reduce size 5f structure? Note there is no lot coverage variances required with the most restrictive lot area at 29,490 s.f. Structural cover.-* *e is shown at 12.6%. Refer to Section 11.33, Subdivision 4. Typical sections for City roads. The right-of-way requested per ordinance for both private and public streets is 50' . Plat map shows Leaf Street at a 66' total width. The City now asks for 30'. What do you recommend ro the Council? The survey shows existing homes on adjacent lots meeting a 50+ or -' setback from aajacent tributaries. Survey of the developed homes adjacent to the tributary show the following setbacks: 6b 105 135 IS is is 110 75 70 145 185 253 261 200 180 l‘!0 8 0 Cygnet built in 19'’3 Cygnet built in 1959 Cygnet built in 1972 Cygnet built in 1967 is 100 Cygnet built in 1964 is 80' Cygnet built in 1963 Cygnet built in 1960 Leaf Street built in 1958 is Le.Ti'' Street built in 1987 .'.s Leaf Street built in 1959 is T.o;^f built Drier t<^ 1 75 100 45 53 50' Leaf Street built prior t<^ 1959 is 50' Zoning File #1792 January 12, 1993 Page 4 is 73 Range of setbacks is from 45-110'. The average setback Hardship Statement Refer to applicant's addendum. Exhibit B. reviewed as follows: Hardships are A. Applicant has owned the property for 34 years. Proposed setbacks are similar to the pattern of development on adjacent properties. B. Level of pond or adjacent tributary is determined by the existence and maintenance of dam that creates artificial ponding. C. Increase runoff from the proposed construction will not run directly into the pond but drains first to west over a longer grassed route that eventually would reach the pond. E. Area in front of dam is a large sediment basin. Current proposal will minimize need for excavation and will take advantage of existing contour. F. Unique topographic features that includes the creek that Intersects along the east side of the property c.'-eating a dry buildable island to the east side of creek. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ti I nT , ' -IC: c Initial Application Fee $175. OOT^**' ; Vi($50.00 per each additional vfr4ance-)'-«*^-‘’ Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION A*/.. ♦ ’ *Trv M~ UJi I I Ul UtiWifUcruMirc nccT/'T I AMCTMU-U Ul t J Ul. J. W\/w rucr\C l iccA n / rrv r;f c ,V*. «. u* « w A.- » vv rjcrzTrjT^ruMik' vnnr>i.c4.^f I tttnitii I u*u Oni Ti^ ^ V / V f i»X. Site Address //O Z t'AF srxef Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) OV’~//7^23 22. Attach legal description tc application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_ _ _A//'X , /JS’ff (month/year) I (do){do notj^also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; _ _residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District; /^X*-/S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ yyfC^A^r APPLICANT Phone (home) ^7J-SVJF Name Address: Phone (work) JV/V<^ City; Z.c/J(7 X'fye Zip; STSSF OWNER (if different than applicant)Phona (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ /YF, Ftno Describe request in detail.; 7 “^^ CF/\yjT/Ci4 ct" / x zr ^ -Z~ FF/f.s. _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED X Lot Area X Setback: Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: c/a F ’/c C4///JV rAX /X£c> /JX t A C~ CXt fx- rX/f x/cu/ Af <’TX4.,rF'^'^ X rz/X /rr^ ^ Ar/ zic F/tX*' • k ,, y 4t /H* t' ^* X y r f* ^ ^ ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. _Completed Application Form 2. _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271) . 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licei.sed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (orovide one (1) copy 8%"xll” for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8ii'*xll"). 6. _SJcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8is"xll'*). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any ;her persons you wish notified of this application. 8._ _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicont and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variMce application is not complete if •the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agraes to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date / ^ ^ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledgcs and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- t’on and verification of this request. Owner’s Si'-mature Date /J2 -.2 ! ^ Z. Applicant must have all submittals into tSe^ City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission emd Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. \ January 6, 1992 0 A¥ 'e 1993 Orono Planning Commission & Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, NN 55323 Dear Members: I have owned this lot for 34 years and wish to construct a house on jt. Prior to the new shoreland regulations of a year ago the setback from the pond was 26 feet and there was adeguate room to build. This lot was not originally designed with a 75 foot setback in mind. Due to the meandering creek the 75 foot setback can not be met. The proposed setbacks as shown on the site plan are comparable to the adjoining structures. One could qtiestion whether the setback should even be measured from the edge of the pond since the homeowners are responsible for the existence and maintenance of the dam and the centerline of the original creek is much farther away. I have looked at moving closer to Leaf Street but in prior meetings wi*h the council a 25 foot road easement was agreed upon since no road easement presently exists. This already brings me 0 feet closer than in other places on Leaf Street which have a 33 foot easement. Even though Leaf Street is being reconstructed to its original narrow width at this time, there is a good possibility that it could be widened in the future causing the hoLtse to be even closer to the road. Concerning drainage and runoff into the pond, there is less direct runoff from the proposed house since more runoff would be running west first and taking a longer route through grass areas to eventually reach the creek. Also, the area in front of the dam is a very large sediment basin anyway. This proposed house fits in well with the existing contours so that very little grading outside of the foundation is necessary. The adjoining lots have garage and sheds much closer to the pond than this proposal and the setbacks being proposed are certainly well in line with the neighborhood considering the unique topographic features and creek location on this lot. Sincerely, Donald R. Gronbern RUN DATE 12/16/92BATCH 001PROP ADDR 0»#IER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR MENT^EPIN COUNTY PROPERTi INFORMATIOfI SYSTEM PROPERTY OWERS LIST36 <^-117-25 Zi 0003 03195 \ NATERtOHN RO T C RITTER IKS RITTER THOMAS C I'KALLI S RITTER 3195 HAjERhp^ RO lONQ LAKE MN\ 55356 36 09-117-23 22 0006 00140 LEAF ST D G EHALT A B J EHALT BRIAN 6 I BARBARA J EHALT 190 LEAF ST LONG LAKE m 55356 36 09-117-23 22 0010 00105 CYGNET PL G J EH.UT ETAL GREGORY J EHALT 105 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE MN 55356 56 \09-117-23 22 0017 0006\ CYGNET PL P A A\i;Tko PAUL Ay\AMI L VITKO 60 cyone Vplace L0rffylAKE\M 55356 56 05-117-23 11 0005 00095 LEAF ST E C GRAHAM JR ETAL E C GRAHAM JR 95 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 09-117-23 22 000900080 LEAF ST SHIRLEY HALL SHIRLEY A HALL 80 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 09-117-23 22 0008 00065 CYGNET PL DIANE L KOEPKE DIANE L KOEPKE 65 CYGT4ET PLACE LONG LAKE MN 55356 36 09x117-23 22^0011 00135 \YGflEt/PL H R ANOER^JSQK A ElOERF^QK A E E H R Af4DER^4 A E E 135 CYGNSf \ LONG L5« MN\ 55356 MORIARTY MORIARTY 38 09-117-23 22 0025 00180 LEAF ST R W HOVEY A T G HEALEY ROBERT N HOv^EY THOMAS G HEALEY 160 LEAF ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 001 00013 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 138 09-117-23 22 000500110 LEAF ST D R GROr^ERG ETAL D R GRONBERG 65 NILLOH DRIVE NO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 09-117-23 22 C009 00085 CYGT4ET PL G J EHALT ETAL GREGORY J EHALT 105 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE m 55356 38 09-117-23 22 0016 00060\ C)fWET PL D A M Wrier jr DONALD X MARGARET CURRIER JR 60 CYW^ PLACE LONG;LAKe\^ 55356 58 22 0026 00200 \ L^r ST L R BELt/HY t C H BELLAMY LOUIS IKA.COLLEN C BELLAMY c•TV i 200 L»F L0»« LAKE 55356 ■ DO hewipin coi»nY property information systemPROPERTY OFWERS LIST REPORT NO. PI<*35<^01 PAGE 2 REPRESEWA™ 0fMJ?5S aT10N^As '^"ap ?L5- % *i „..••»• ' .’Ti. '! f' ■:- ’ ■ 4 '<ZX^A.. DATE >4!2B^ >Y jMiJMhd -) Exinti nq I.ona I IV>scrv;>*: inn Tract D, Heqistcred Land f.urvoy No. 744, filoM of KiMiiMtr.ir of Titlt;*-., County of lli.'nnopin. This survey shows t*u? i \ of th«' Ijounthir ’ <•?; and topo<ira|>hy of tho above doscrituid f»rof)c*rty. It <locs not r«> nhow .my other improvoments or onoroaclmonts. o — y# — (u>. Datum Iron maikor Kxistinq contour i;xiH*.tnq elevation Assumed I K*»r44%v> i itt it ttiiiL fciirv'*»v tA.' \ in»al rt%«< am i ■ 44»r t%%\ . <1 1 t\A rm t# • . /__• •__' I The undorsignud has looked at the site plan regarding the proposed variances for Donald Gronberq to construct a house on Tract B, Reg­ istered Land Survey No. 744 , and has no objection to what ‘'e is proposing. ^lame/ /O DateAddress / Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form I (we) [print name(s)] of / <^ b (print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed u;.>e of the property located at ///; Lr-Ap- cT_ _ _ _ _ _ also referred to as Land Use Application No. / 7 7Z ♦ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement# I (we) am (are) rot asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. I (we) [print name(s)][print adc:*'ss] have reviewed the plans for the proposed i;..provement or proposed use of the property located at _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property owner Pate zcnrn^otfi" .\”lV;.Vto"d/yi'prio,* to th/ .=..dul*> -..tin, dot.. The undersigned has looked at the site plan regarding the proposed variances for Donald Gronberq to construct a house on Tract B, Reg- /H) i t-.-i i- 5 I Address Date Adjacent Property Ovmors* Acknowledgement Form <- I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ of mo Zf-if [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at i/_ _ _ _ _ _ also referred to as Land Use Application • No. /772^* property located at _ Application No. _ _ _* also referred to as Land Use I (wc) understanvj that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am th« improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or requires Council approval. Property Owner Date If you have any “ur‘ccmmtnV.*’^to‘"thi'*Bu”r«ng°J coii'ng'oftice* iri.a.t lo"da"y. prior to the .cheduled meeting date. H k The undersigned has looked at the site plan regarding the proposed variances for Donald Gronberq to construct a house on Tract B, Reg­ istered Land Survey No. 744, and has no objection to what he is proposing. , _/-v / Name Address Date J I (we) understand that in executirig this acknowledgement/ I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project, or use requires Council approval. /- Property Ownet Date , ,■ J /-Iff / Property Owner Date ********************** *************** I (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at __________________________also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement/ I (we) am (are) not asked to declare “approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building « Zoning office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date- Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (we) C.C.c:>^/ C^^lc «■ (print name(s)] L.glir.4- [print address] have reviewed the plans for the pro po sed improvement or proposed use of th property located at t/r Lr^/yf^ _________ also referred to as Land Us Application No. /?<?P . I (we) understand that rn executing this acknowledgement, I (we) a: (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or uS' but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware o. the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or us* requires Council approval. / Date /•o/t Date ************************************** I (we) (print name(s)](print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ___________________________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. _ _ _. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) air (are) not asked to declare~approval or aisapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you havo any Informeticn that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building ft Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. L / 4 -/ /' / <:HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE one) (O^TS^ 75-250 250-500' 500- • 1300' Zo^'oeoKo 1gxioTiK^Hardcover in Zone • ft . ■ £^2 S.F. LENGTH WIDTH ■ •■ ■ / • • • • mm •, S.F. L,J ,• 1 • • X • • . S. r • - v^..J m m m X • a S.F. t *' # * •% .^ • • Per^H X • • m • • •• •« nc S.F.. • ' • ss • S.F. • • c. Driveway x - - -:— • • S.F. m m ') D.. Sidewalk _ E. Patio/ Deck A^ckl. F. Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING - X S.F. S.F. . X . X . X S.F Z' yso i*i 'X < __ X_ _ X X G. Other • • • Total Hardcover in /one Total Property Area in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Q /9cZ: B it.iaa X 100 - S • F • S.F.A C2^0 i.P.ui % 0-75 itJiuft. j/#r Z y2,S9o S^.rr. ^ ^ ^ 4 rir€*ST OP A 4 <€0O / JJf. 0 me . ^ ^ -%*4 ^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0*75' (fS-25^ 250-500' 500-1000 /2-/7- JZ fifiOPoSfO ,, _-g.^KTiMG Hardcover in Zone % • A. ■ House 30 3Z LENGTH /^T WIDTH X ^ 3^22. 22 • .. • 3. Garage 32 2 y. 29 X ___2Z • * tv* c. Driveway D.. Sidewalk _ /y r /9c - nc ______:______X____ E. Patio / ......... Deck ________• X___ F. Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY » . PLASTIC- SHEETING X X G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 7^8 yy /3/0 Z/9Z /tJ 0-7S /SOO S.F. s.rj S.F. S.F. /oo S.F. :v3 S.F. y 2o . . S.F. .1 S.F. S.F. __________ S.F. __________ S.F. __________ S.F. ___________ S.F. 3 7VZ S.F. /r^ f90 i.r. ZfJJ zsviffa utfUfSr : *¥Sqo -Lps] /r.^90 X 100 - ^ - y rtf s 2V.9r ..THfr**r7 ^ 3'sVZ T fitly fuMf f»* ^ tar i €7 19a ^ 2J.7tftf s/r,6fO ifir L■y r r 9 ’9": 9*^r~r\ \24j /#.# Vt^ yTr9-rv'^-% f>o«u:r ii »n tr«ct ■, H«‘j 1 »»:«r«<1 !»an(^ p»irv»>y No. 744, files of R«9i»rrftr of Titles, Coun^^y ot /) t »** * * g) ^ t M ^ d at»^€ir * o : iron worker j contour t l»ror)O0©<1 c*ontour «... * * .... I A O t S %9\I I ^ % 9^ r\ n ^rn ^ >> I'n \ T\ I 7^- i- fir,, K fs. 5 I pVir~ f / CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3198NO. A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL - REDUCTION OP PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OP ASSESSMENT POR DONALD GRONBERG PROPERTY LOCATED ON LEAP STREET WHEREAS, on July 27, 1992 the O^ono City Council adopted l<e.7olution No. 3145 to adopt the Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer assessment roil? and WHEREAS, Donald R. Gronberg is owner of the parcel of land legally described as Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 744, Files of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the property); and WHEREAS, the assessment roll adopted in Resolution No. 3145 the principal amount of the assessment for the property at 5'.8,8GO.OO; and WHEREAS, the property owner appealed the amount of the assessment; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council reviewed the merits of the assessment appeal and agreed to reduce the principal amount of the assessment from $18,880.00 to $11,400.00 based on one or more of .he following f^’^iings of fact; 1. and pond areas. 2.Th® lot was created as part of RLS No. 744 in March 1958, and met the 25,000 8.f./120* area in width standards then in effect. Page 1 of 4 //O. o\\CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3198 3. City Ordinance No. 22, adopted 10/12/59, established a minimum building lot size of 1 acre and 140' minimum width at the building line. That code allowed the City Council to grant variances for substandard lots in single separate ownership. 4. The property continued its status as a substandard lot with the 1967 rezoning to R~1C, 1 acre single fcunily residential. 5. The lot became even more substandard when the area was rezoned to RR-IB in 1975, requiring 2 acres and 200' width. 6. Environment regulations have gradually reduced the potential buildable area of the lot. Ordinance No. 63 in April 1964 excluded wetlands from the dry buildable area calculation. Ordinance No. ‘*79, adopted in September 1975, required a 26' structure ick from the pond. The Shoreland Regulations adopted 92 required a 75' structural setback from the pond if xot is sewered, 100' if it is not sewered. 7. Septic Sj,iStem requirements through the years have become increasingly strict. 8. Until the City Council adopted the Shoreland Regulations in February 1992, a house could have been constructed on the property meeting all state septic system design and setback requirements and would have met all Orono zoning code requirements except the lot area and width requirements. 9. Prior to 1975, substandard lots of similar size and character were granted building permits for construction of single family residences without the need for variances in the Cygnet/Leaf neighborhood in which the property is located. 13. Lot area and width variances were granted for similarly situated lots in the Cygnet/Leaf neighborhood after the 1975 rezoning to 2 acre lot standards. Page 2 of 4 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3198 11. 12. 13. Prior t-o adoption of the assessment roll, the City Council directed that all vacant lots less than 2 acres in area be assessed the full unit amount rather than having said assessment reduced as was done for developed lots in the neighborhood, on the basis that the value of vacant substandards lots increases substantially more than that of developed lots as a result of the sewer project. The property has been in single separate ownership of the current owner since 1959. It is highly likely that the lot area and width variances to construct a residence on the property would have been granted prior to the adoption of new Shoreland Regulations in February 1992. The assessment of a full unit principal amount of $18,880.00 for the property would be an unfair burden to the property owner on the basis that as a lot in single separate ownership it likely would have been allowed to be developed with a single family residence as recently as six months prior to adoption of the assessment roll, and therefore the benefit to the property is no greater than the $11,400.00 benefit to other developed lots in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Stubbs Bay s^itary sewer assessment roll adopted per Resolution amended to revise the principal assessment amount for the property from $18,880.00 to $11,400.00. Adopted by the City Council this 9th day of November, 1992. 14. llin,'City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 3 of 4 o, o CITYof OROSrO R'iSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3198 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing ins*:rument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of November, 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. notary ^pub Ik ^"- m^nesota HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission 8-1/ 96 ti Page 4 of 4 i ft LctSL U6 L CITY of ORONO Mitmrfpol Offigs Post Office Box 66 Crjr:U B«r, MlflnesoCa5S2M066 September 29, 1992 Steve SamborsJcl 445 East LaJce Street Wavzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr, Samhorski, This letter is to confira the City Council's action and our agreement concerning the sanitary sewer assessment and .**«^.enis? xe:lat:ed to the property owned by Don Grcnberc at 1*»0 Leaf Street. ^ The Cmy Councl 1 has detemmed the orooertv is a buildahle lot and, as such, is to be assessed at a’level ”sia5 lar to other comparable properties. Other prooerties in the Cygnet and Deaf area were assessed at $11,400.00" in exchange for the ,of easements needed rcr rhe oro*^ect at no cost to the City. The agreement we have worked out concerning the Gronberg property is that the assessment will be $11,400.00 in exchange for Mr. (gronberg providing aj2S-f-oo.t-rqa^ -^d n.tili.ty«as«5rcht rarid ^-10-fobt-drainage and..utility::easeiaex^. If you have any (raestions please call me. Thanks for your help. me Ronald J'. Moorse City Adrainistrator cc:Don Gronberg 110 Leaf Street Long Lake, MN 55356 ‘IBLTTKONX - 473-7357 • EV5 - 4734510 / TO: FROM: DATE Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmcmbers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Buildine «Sc Zoning Administrator February 5, 1993 SUBJECT: #1795 LuAnn Walters, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Additional Exhibits K - Wedeman Memo L - Revised Site Plan M - City Engineer’s Second Review N - Staff Memo Brief Review of Application The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit to allow daycare use with limited catering service. Full day smdents will be provided two meals breakfast and lunch. It is the intention ot applicant to offer pre-ordered light suppers for students and families. Applicant made it clear to Planning Commission members that this would not be a service open to general public and that the meals would either be charged on a monthly bill or through special food tickets. Major concern for the limited catering was the impact on the septic systems. Weekman has been asked to provide additional information concerning the impact of catering at a maximum 60 student use, in other words, if all 60 students’ families ordered meals at one time. Review Exhibit K. Weekman advises ba.sed on the daycare with limited catering the existing system would serve up to 30 persons on a daily basis. If the catering was not provided, it would serve up to 38 persons. If op>eration is expanded to include up to a total of 70 persons, Weekman advises the existing mound system and the secondary mound system to be installed to serve the additional people will use up all available area suitable for alternate septic development. There would be no additional area tor an alternate septic site to serve future needs. Maximum use of the property will be permitted as long as tb- septic system remains conforming. Weekman asks that a water meter be installed so that the Uty can gauge th- actual usage. He notes the septic code does not require an alternate septic test site as a result of the new use. Both owner and applicant have been fully advised of the septic limitations of the property. It is the desire of owner and applicant to obtain approval of the conditional use permit at a maximum user level. The state licensing for daycare will set maximum use of facility at a range of 55-60 students and septic capacity will dictate water use level. Staff had originally presented the application with a student-teacher maximum use at 60. Ms. Walters has advised that she proposes a 70 student-teacher maximum use. This is based on the area to student ratio of the state licensing standards requiring 35 s.f. tor each student in a daycare operation. She advises that student level could be approved at a maximum use level Zoning File #1795 February 5. 1993 Page 2 of 55 to 60. The required student-teacher ratio is 1 teacher per 10 students. It is her goal to have an administrator with 6 teachers, 2 aides and a cook. Applicant has asked to amend tlie application to a maximum student-teacher use at 70. Please note the maximum use at the Planning Conjmission review was approved at 60. It has been suggested that variances for parking be addressed as we are now dealing with a conforming use of the property. Earlier applications dealing with the non-conforming commercial uses involved setback variances for parking. Parking was once again reviewed at the time the State Highway Department acquired the additional area with the upgrading of the intersection and the installation of the semaphore. The following setback variances are required for parking based on most recently amended site plan, review Exhibits L and N: 1. Section 10.61, Subd. 5 (A). Required setback = 50’ Existing = 0’ Proposed = 0’ (27’ from travehd road State Highway No. 12, 30’ County Road 6) If Council deems it necessary' to address substandard setbacks of existing structure, setback variances would be as follows: A. Setback from State Highway 12 Required = 50’ 16 ’ from lot line 43’ (43’ from traveled road) B. County Road 6 Required = 50’ 40’ from lot line (NW corner of structure) 70’ from traveled road Review of Amended Site Plan Applicant has provided an amended site plan reflecting directives of Planning Conunission approval at their Januaty* meeting. Parking Seventeen parking stalls are shown. There are only 13 valid parking places. Both City staff and Countv concur that they would noi approve parking stalls located within defmed right- of-wav of adjacent roadways. Refer to staff sketch. Exhibit N. The original design submitted by the City Engineer. H-l and H-2 were not acceptable to applicant because of the actual pattern Zoning File ^1795 February 5, 1993 Page 3 of usage of parents in bringing children to daycare facility. It is not a question of driving in and letting children proceed into the building on their own. Parents accompany their child inside. They are required to park. The layouts presented by the City Engineer presented potential hazards where children would be required to walk in front of a moving car in the outside lane. Eight spaces are required. Thirteen are proposed. Signs ApplicaPit has asked for two signs not to exceed the allowed 12 s.f. Tlie sign adjacent to Highway 12 appears to meet the 5’ setback and will create no siting problems at the intersection. The sign located adjacent to County Road 6 is located within the right-of-way and must be relocated within the lot lines of the property meeting the required 5’ setback. Required Open Play Area Code requires fencing when play area is 15’ or more from street lot line. Play area is shown at 10’ and at a maximum of 3,400 s.f. (50 s.f. per student). Play area well exceeds the area for 55-60 smdents. Staff recommends that play area fencing be moved back in line with the front line of the building - approximately 16’ from lot line. Access Access will be relocated further to the east. The traffic entering in and out of property will be moved further away from tlie traffic intersection. Dave Zetterstrom of the Hennepin DOT has approved the eastern access and sees no problem with the County approving portions of the driveway located within the adjacent right-of-way. Once again he concurs with staff that no parking stalls should be permanently located within the right-of-way. If the County- permit requires removal of paved areas within the right-of-ways, that disturbed areas be restored to natural ground cover. Zetterstrom has noted tliat he has asked the County to review the speed limits established along County Road 6 in the area. He questions the recommended speed at a curve area shown at 50 mph. The entire area shall be re-evaluated for adjustments in speed level. Luiidscaplng I.andscaping has been shown along the south and east sides of the play area. The Planning Commission had not required additional landscaping within the developed portions of the property. The higher elevations to the east with existing vegetation provides a natural buffer to the residential property. The real issue for this review is that we have no confirmation as to tmal septic capabilities of property It is septic capacity that will limit the total number of smdent-teacher Zoning File .<^1795 February 5. 1993 Page 4 ratio for the daycare. The catering aspect presents additional demands but we have no knowledge yet of that impact. Planning Commission conditioned approval on catering be eliminated if problems result. It would certainly be to the owner ’s benefit to know if septic capacity is available before he expends appreciable amounts of money in developing a sprinkler system for the building. Both applicant and owner have been made aware of the septic issues ever since the early preliminary discussions of this application. It has been impossible to provide the septic testing at this time of year. Please review the enclosed staff packet prepared for the Planning Commission and minutes of the Planning Commission for background on the application. Options of Action To approve the conditional use permit for LuAnn Walters based on the Planning Commission recommendation for the property located at 3800 Wayzata Blvd. to allow a daycare use to be installed in the existing structure. The daycare use to be limited to a student-teacher use level of 60. Use shall consist of limited catering service to clients of daycare. Findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation have been set forth in the enclosed resolution; or To limit Council ’s approval to the first stage of the daycare operation that would make use of the existing facility and septic system w ithout the need of a sprinkler system at the 29 student-teacher level use. Limited catering would be allowed. The City will require a water meter to be installed so that water use can be determined. Applicant can proceed with the second stage of the conditional use permit as soon as septic testing confirms a reasonable use level for property. First stage improvements will require the relocation of the curb cut to the east and striping of approved parking stalls and per County ’s permit the possible removal of paved areas within right-of-way. Applicant/owner will be required to execute a developer ’s agreement and post appropriate security until all required improvements are completed within a reasonable period of time. In the first stage, applicant may not wish to proceed with an open fenced play area. The installation of play area and additional landscaping would be postponed until the maxunum use level is resolved with the second stage review . The enclosed resolution can be amended to reflect approval of first stage of conditional use permit. cb A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMH PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) FILE ri79S WHEREAS, LuAiin Wallers of Open Anns Child Care, (hereinafter "the applicant") has applied to the City for a daycare at the property owned by Clifford L. Olten located at 38(X) Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City ") and legally described as: Those parts of Lots 11, 12, and 13, "MINNETONKA GARDEN ACRES', according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of the centerline of Hennepin County Slate Aid Highway No. 6 Plat 5. as delineated in Book 70. Page 3844152 of Hennepin County Records. Also the north 1/2 of adjoining old County Road No. 6 now vacated, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and VMIEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono per Section 10.28, Subdivision 3(A) for a conditional use permit to permit a daycare use consisting of child care services for pre-school and school age children and a limited catering kitchen for child care children and families. Conditional use would limit total users of facility to 60. This would include not onlv student but employees of daycare. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS 1 This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1795 2. The p'operty is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 1.64 acres. Page 1 of 5 i 3. On January 19. 1993, the Orono Planning Com;nission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended unanimous approval based on (he following findings; A) The property located outside of the shoreland overlay district not subject to hardcover controls contains 15,055 s.f. or 21% hardcover. B) The proposed use will have no impact on adjacent residential properties based on the higher elevations to the east. 4. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow daycare use with limited catering will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Bash'd upon one or more of the above finding;. the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code .Section 10.28, Subdivision 3(A) to permit daycare use with limited catering to be installed in the existing structure lixated at 3800 Wayzata Boulevard for the Open Arms Child Care facility, subject to the following conditions; 1 At the time both student and instructor use exceeds 29 an approved sprinkler system must be installed. A new well to be installed at the time of the installation of the sprinkler system must be placed to the «.st side of property in order to preserve future drainfield sites to the east. Page 2 of 5 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. A new septic system must be installed at the time tlie daycare student-instructor use exceeds 38 or at the lime the student-instructor use consisting of daycare with limiting catering exceeds 30. Applicant is hereby advised that if limited catering use is found to have a negative impact on existing septic facilities that such use must cease within seven days written notice of the on-site septic manager. Upon application for a building permit, applicant must provide confirmation that; State licensing requirements have been met and that a license is pending. All food preparation and maintenance of kitchen shall be approved, inspected and administered by the Hennepin County Environmental Health Department. All construction shall be subject to the standards of the State Fire Code and Uniform Building Code. All plans submitted with the building permit application must be drawn by a licen.sed architect. The State Fire Marshall shall approve plans to insure fire extinguisher, exiting signs, alarm systems and fire drill procedures meet the necessary guidelines. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with tlie applicant and are permissive only and must be exerci.sed by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (February 8, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Tht undersigned applicant and authorized agent of (7pen Arms Child Care and owner of the property have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8lh day of February, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr,, Mayor Property Owncr(s) Authorized Agent of Open Amis Child Care STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of February. 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the feregoinj? instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) tree act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 A.-, To:Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:January 14, 1993 Subject: #1795 LuAnn Walters, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB, Rural Residential Total area = *71,482 s.f. or 1.64 acres Hardcover area = 15,055 s.f. or 21%. Refer to Exhibit C, note property is not subject to hardcover regulations for shoreland property. Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. 3 . Section 10.28, Subd. 3 (A) - Conditional use permit required for day care/school use. A. Setback of structure from adjacent residential lot line Required = 50' Proposed/existing ■ 107' B.Fence required for open play area within 15' of street lot line. Open play area located 10' from street lot line and 37' from traveled road shall be fenced. C.Nursery school requires 50 s.f. of playground space per pupil. Proposed 2,500 s.f. 29 pupils require 1,450 s.f. 50 pupils require 2,500 s.f. 60 pupils require 3,000 s.f. Section 10.61, Subd. 10 (J) - Parking requirements for day nursery use. Formula =4+1 for each 500 s.f. in excess of 1,000 s.f. floor area. Gross floor area = 2,940 s.f. Net floor area « 2,646 s.f. (10% reduction for storage, halls, utility rooms, etc.) Proposed = 18 Required ■ 8 (4 + [500 ? 1,646 * 4]) Section 10.61, Subd. 2 (A) - Signage. Allowed » 12 s.f. per surface Proposed » 1 sign limited to 12 s.f. per surface Zoning File #1795 January 14, 1993 Page 2 List o£ Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Applicants Addendum E - Weckman Memo F - Septic Map G - Gustafson Report 1/12/93 H-1-2 Engineer's Alternative Plans for Parking & Traffic Flow I - Floor Plan J - Site Plan Review of Application The proposed application proposes the first conforming use for the subject property in over 40 years. Prior to 3 years ago, the property was used for a commercial/retail use. The use was severely limited and many of the businesses failed. As a non-conforming use, once the use ceases for a period of 12 months, the use of the property must return back to a conforming use. The applicant proposes a comprehensive child care center consisting of pre-school age children aged 2-1/2 through school age operating 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The applicant seeks approval for a total of 60 children enrollment. Based on the current capacity of the facility, the first phase of the operation will be limited to 29 consisting of both students and teachers. At the time the facility serves more than 29, a sprinkler system and new well will be installed. The new welx must be installed to the west side of the property or close to the principal structure providing a minimum 75' separation for future septic drainfield area to east side of property. Refer to Exhibit J. Per Weckman's memo, the current septic system can serve total of 38 student/teacher use level. Refer to Exhibits E and F. Weckman'8 memo reaffirms there is adequate area to serve a day care facility at a maximum 60 student enrollment. Gustafson, of the City Engineer's office, recommends a new parking layout reducing the proposed 18 spaces to required 8 and providing adequate area for a service lane to allow quick in and out movements from property. Refer to Exhibits H-1-2. Refer to Exhibit J. The curb cut shown at Highway 12 has been removed. The current access drive in use was to have been abandoned. The Engineer recommends that the proposed entrance to the east side of property and new drive be installed. Portions or the access drive will encroach within County right-of-way. There Zoning File #1795 January 14, 1993 Page 3 are also other existing paved areas located within County right-of- way. The County approved the original site plan at the time of the acquisition of additional right-of-way for CSAH 6. Applicant must apply for an updated entrance permit in order to install new curb cut and portion of access drive that will encroach expanded County right-of-way along northwest side of property. Please review Exhibit B. Applicant's addendum provides background on Mrs. Walters' professional experience. The Open Arms Child Care concept is reviewed. The applicant will be present to answer any questions members may have concerning the operation. Note that meals will be served at the facility. In fact, pre­ ordered meals will be available for parents and families. Based on the level of use, the On-site Septic Manager sees no problem with this phase of the operation. The preparation, handling, serving of food and maintenance of kitchen must comply with the Hennepin County Environmental Health Guidelines established in the State Health Code. Staff would recommend that the open air fenced play area be expanded now to the maximum required 3,000 s.f. It is currently shown at 2,500 s.f. The site plan shows no plan for landscaping. The west side of the property is predominantly occupied with parking, access drive, facility and accessory uses. The east side, located in higher, grassed elevations, provides a nature buffer for adjacent residential area. Staff would recommend that the open play area be screened with natural plantings along the south and east side of the fence. Members may have other recommendations. It will be necessary to restore groundcover over areas disturbed with removal of blacktop at curb cut. The applicant sees no need for additional signage area at this time. Lighting will be limited and used for security purposes and for immediate users of the facility. All lighting must be shielded and directed downward. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Open Arms Child Care facility that would consist of child care services for pre-school and school age children still needing child cai'e and a limited catering kitchen for child care children and families. The conditional use permit would limit enrollment to a total of 60 students based on the area to student ratio established in State code for required size of principal structure and per Orono's septic ordinance. This approval is based on the following conditions: Zoning File #1795 January 14, 1993 Page 4 1. Site plan submitted with application shall be amended to include the following: Revise parking area to include a minimum 8 spaces and appropriate striping designating these parking places. Isv a. b. The existing curb cut at the northwest of property to be removed and new curb cut installed as shown on site plan. A minimum 20' access drive to be installed. c. Applicant to obtain Hennepin County driveway permit for installation of new curb cut and approval of expanded drive within right-of-way of County Road 6. d. Fenced play area to be expanaed to 3,000 s.f. to meet outside playground area for 6C students. e. Landscaping to be provided along south and east side of outdoor play area. f. Locate single sign to be installed on property. 2. At the time both student and instructor use exceeds 29, an approved sprinkler system must be installed. The new well to be installed at the time of the installation of the sprinkler system must be placed to the west side of property in order to preserve future drainfield site to the east. 3. At the time the student/instructor use exceeds 38, a new septic system must be installed. 4. Upon application for a building permit, applicant must provide confirmation that State licensing requirements have been met and that a license is pending. 5. All food preparation and maintenance of kitchen shall be approved, inspected and administered by the Hennepin County Environmental Health Department. g ^ All construction shall be subject to the standards of^ the State Fire Code and Uniform Building Code. All pxans submitted with the building permit application must be drawn by a licensed architect. 7. The State Fire Marshall shall approve plans to ensure fire extinguishers, exiting signs, alarm systems and fire drill procedures meet the necessary guideline. CITY OF OROflO - GENERAL LAND USE i\PPLlCAT10N - PROPERTY LOCATION . Ttr Site Address ^O 0 ^tv i (X,l\ 1 Property Identification Numbeyrw(P.I.D.) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name /w flfwj Phone (home) «/7</ 2 3^ Phone (work) Address S2./Q fj(^^ AtO- City ^1 Zip ^ '> 2vy OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Neune Address Phone City Zip 1 Date Property Acquired I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. (ir.onth/year) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use ClVf OF OROHO FISA.^C£ OFFICE f ICA /AnAA/) vvvv Oi QFH «7er /A I . V <7*r {■ * > w‘. V $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or‘"^f£^dpi4^i|^ __ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more >*261630 COO 1 Cfil TU _ _ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' or lakeshpraj PRD/PID - see fae schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other “ see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTYPresent Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Tc o tr. ^tf'/y'/ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmer Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff ;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date U rX OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • fRUN DATE 07/11/916ATCM 007PROP AOOR NAMETAXPAYERNAME/AOOR SO 29-118-25 52 0006 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGMED HENN COUNTY PK RESERVE OIST HE^M COUNTY PK RESERVE OIST PROP ADOR (MIER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR ' 58 29-118-25 5A 0006 • 03660 SIXTH AVE N PARK GUN CLUB INC PARK GUN CLUB C/0 RUBY 6ESCHHIN0 A959 VERA CRUZ AVE I1PLS m 55929 PROP ADOR 06t«R NAME TAXPAYER NAHF/AOOR • • PROP ADOR’ ONNER NAilE TAXPAYER MATC/ADOR 58 52-116-25 21 0005 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIOIEO S A CIRSPINSKI ETAL CLIFFORD L OFTEN 2265 N NAYZATA DLVO LONG LAKE Ftl 55556 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0FMER3 LIST »• 58 52-118-25 29 0009 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICNED LISLE VICKERMAN JR El AL ORCHARD PARK FARM INC 5980 NATERTOm RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 REPORT NO. PI955901 . ’ .. ; 1PACE 17 .•58 29-118-25 55 000105960 SIXTH AVE N NORTHERN STATES POHER CO NSP - PROPERTY TAX DEPT 919 NICOLLET MALL MPLS MN 55901 33 29-118-25 55 0008030T8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY BUR! INGTON NORTHERN RY ■4L ' 4 . - • , • • . • ^ • • 'v/ • » 38 29-118'2S 34 0006 037^0 HAYZATA BLVO H CLIFFORD L OTTEN CLIFFORD L OFTEN 2265 N HAYZATA DLVO LOTiG LAKE HT4 55356 . 38 29-118-25 34 0009 03800 HAYZATA BLVD H D H CURTIS ASA CIRSPINSKI BARBARA CURTIS « i 3907 JANET LA BROOKLYN PARK 55430 . • I* \ J # T* **•*.••• *2 • ... • 38 52-118-23 22 0002 03825 SIXTH AVE N FRED MOLASEK JR ETAL FRED MOLASEK JR 3825 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MT4 B53S6 58 52-118-25 22 0005 05825 SIXTH AVE N FRED MOLASEK JR ETAL FRED MOLASEK JR 5825 6TH AVE N LOfiG LAKE MN 55556 (I . r . CO') TOTAL BATCH 007 00010 • t 1 CEri*. ^HAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRrVTtJTTA ION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF > : »->'-.»ffPIN COUITY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF hV KNUMLEDGE ANO BELIEF. DATE i P llll „ /TM: CITo) •’> I i:.*' KU' i U U On u * u u (s) ^ . ^0^ 77 ; t open Arms Child Care 5215 Black Friars Lane Minnetonka , MM. 55345 (r%''•V ' V Application for Conditional Use Permit at ^800 Wayzata Blvd. Lone Lake. MN. ■>=i356 to the City of Orono P 0 Box CO Crystal Ea/k MM. 55323 473-7357 . Property Ovner business Ovner Cliff Otlcn I.o .\nn Valters 1612) 173 *5'I25 Fax <73 7232 (612)471 2563 Fax l7i 2363 Tahl,; of Contents I Background Open Arms Child Care Lu Ann Wallers Initial Operaiiun Site Plan Phased Operation Ba?Lk£round Open Arms Child Care ’-vas formed in The business founder Lu Ann trailers has 10 years experience specifically in ihe day care business and IS years experience in manai^emeni cv consulting The Open Arm> vi^i.in was based <»n a mother s need to find an alterr aiive to existing child care program:^ The Open Arms Child Care concept combines the best of a large center and the be>t of a family home dav care The first began in 10”'> in St Paul providing a unique combination home t.eiuer ‘.'pen Anns Child Care expanded to two additional sites in Roseville and Colden Valley Each business ’vas full to license capacity *v:th:n j months Senator Durenherger 'vroie a letter of appreciation and endorsement of the innovating child care appr'iach Open Arms was pioneering Lu Ann s Ramsey County Licensing worker Sue L’hler affirmed that Open Arms was one of the top 4 child cares in the IMii liLcn^cu htme child cares ^ne was responsible fer in Ramie'. County Open Arms was also the first home center to be allowed to train high school students on a gus eminent student aid program All three 'vere sold in IdSq at a profit while retaining the rights to the Open Arms (ihild Care name Open .Arms met with tremendous support ranging from neighbors, public school, to extended family members ard consistently maintained a waiting list for eurollineni Open Arms often participated in local church summer bible schools which resulted in good w..rking relations with local churches as veil Lu Ann Walters was Director of Operations of the Souls Haroor N'iculciie Hotel dow’ntovn Minneapolis Chiid C^re was one of seven departments Lu Ann was responsible for She managed a. 2 5 million dollar budget reported directly to Orlando Logelin who is now the National Director of Financial Services for the Christian Broadcasting Network out of Norfolk VA (CBN - Pat Robertson > Lu i\nn has held the the positions of Regional Manager for Massachusetts Indemnity U Life .'nsurance Co out of Atlanta GA and General Manager for r*u ever Living PrvdiKt> lu^. uui of Phueni.; \Z Lu Ann al^o worked wiih Richard Mceso. VP for Carlson Learning Co's providinn consiiiting services and conducted family communication seminars, launching their Family Communications Xeiu-ork She is the mother of two daughters <Leah lo Alexa lO) and resides in Minnetonka Her husband of IS years is an Account Executive for Alexander Alexander Inc (largest retail property, casualty insurance broker in U S * Lnit j aj_ a Jlo.n Inili '1 operationi; '-vill iic iVtcuseU .in ihe unique as^pecis of the Open Arms ChilJ O.ire concept for children ages 2 12 through school a^e The existing building '.vill be remodeled to allow ,j classes totaling aO children enrolled in the Open Arms program Normal business hours will be from o 00 am to o 00 pm The building remodeling plan will meet all state regulations for child care centers Breakfast lunch and a ;nack will be served fom the facility Therefore child care regulations will require the facility to be licensed as a commercial kitchen In part, child care regulation ')503 0H5 Subp 3 states Preparing, handling, and serving food and washing food utensils and equipment must comply with the requirements for food and beverage establishments in pans -io2' 24uu lo qaZ' T;000 This kitchen will also provide simple meals to parents and family on a pre-ordered basis which they can bi*ing home This service wUl allow families more time ' )gethe during precious evening ho'uri^ i,. present a m^’re rounded fv ci.’mprehemivr child care Service In checking with city regulations regarding sewage requirements for this kitchen operation, the present sewage svstem is adequate A blue print of these proposed upgrades accomoany this application and are attached A comprehensive child care program will include before o< after school program *'or school age children School age children often have homework needs on a -laily basis It :s our goal to prov'ide specialized programs to assist them with their homewiirk We therefore requesi to be allowed to function as a private school in order to provide a well rounded school age program for these students still requiring child care before after school In summary, we are seeking approval to use the facility in the following area* Child Care Services for Pre-school o*. School Age Children Cateri ng Kitchen for Child Care Children Families Private School f?>r School Age Children Stii' Needing Child Care I Site Plan T'ur foii<.''t'ing site features are planned Fenced Plav Area l .5i'U square feet minimum of fenced play area 'vill be required by child care licensing L\the City of urono Parkinc Parking will remain as it is currently with IS spaces as required by the City of Orono Signage Twelve square foot signage as per city ordinance on Co Rd 5 and Huy 12 Phased Operation As the I'aciliiy is filled to cunvni canaciiy of Z'^). we are plaiinin»; lo expana lo sixty childre*! lo be enrolled This expansion will require a sprinkler system. Piping will be installed immediately to prepare for a sprinkler system Additional site improvements to facilitate a sprinkler system and increased enrollmeni will include 11 a new well closer to the building and Z) expanding the current sewer system according to city requirements. Blue prints for lhi^ future expansion are included TO; From; Date; Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager January fl. 1993 Subject: #1795 LuAnn Walters, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard - Septic Review The applicant proposes to use the existing principal structure as a day care center including a kitchen area for up to 60 occupants on a daily basis. From the University of Minnesota and the Pollution Control Agency On-Site Sewage Treatment Manual, the septic system should be sized as a school or church with a cafeteria as it is the nearest comparison. Based on this criteria, the drainfield should be sized based on 16 gallons per day per unit and the septic tank should be sized based on 17 gallons per day per unit. As the intended daily occupation will total approximately 60 people including staff and children, the drainfield must be sized to accommodate to treat 960 gallons per day while the septic tanks must be sized based on 1,020 gallons per day. The existing septic system consists of three pre-cast concrete septic tanks and a mound-type drainfield installed in 1982. The system is code conforming, however, based on the projected waste load, the septic system is too small. The existing system would be sufficient for no more than 38 people on a daily basis. Therefore, soil testing and system design mu.st be submitted to the City indicating suitable area for new or expanded septic system. Based on the above information, I would recommend apprcpval of the conditional use permit provided that suitable soil testing and septic design information is submitted and approved by staff. Isv *• t « % '• • • v . . *.’V* ••»fVr ‘:i * • s•A .’.’* *i • ■. *• *Vi^ • • ',,/• Jfj**':V , *•••ii-*. • S •;• • ./ y . . V .• V • r •.I * • /N • . • •: . . • V‘r *’ • •. . *, • '•/•I . • i* . • I. . • >I , ’• “• ‘ rti I •'• • ■ : • .’ivV •s •• 'f . “ ir/* . **• ‘| .* <* » ' .V I’'■■•• . •I'l'K; -> • •. *••■ • vi;‘-vT'.lii' .;■ •:•• ■•; •• ,r .*:• • . vr ‘ ; ’ ' / • ’ ISti11.V. *#. . . .V • * »v. 1., . .. • > :^v* * -V . : • •. iJ • ■ '»» •..* •. •• • ‘ ' • . • ■ ‘ , i aV. * V ‘ • S/. • '■ I. • • •: •.* • . '•• :?• !• ■ .(?• ,*' ■ • . ' ;• • * . ■ i* ’*^ ^ *• * A • * *L ’ ' • *'1*4^ •••• .*• £L* • *• • • • "4i' *1 ‘ ; ’;f:’ii' ■ • ■■•.. ■ i . -.f*- ‘ * ‘ . ' . * . •• .* V*. ’ , . •* I. •; ■ K• ‘ , */r •■.•.;••■• : ; .' V, •. (I.- , ;• - t? • ’Ivl.-.- ' . • f’ • ■•• i '•' >■ • w 'i V INSPECTION nEcono OAIE COMPLIANCE PUMPOUT RECORD DATE GALLONS 5-Zf- 0D Lt> cut off D u C i/m^ <C/>AD C c >a >I iOCt(cTy cvU (■>''&-f^2- AJi-uJ Sysrtn^________/ ^, V/'AJ^Vk.eVC ~ ~ :>HouiO duroc^/j TT^fZT T *7~/0-yto Gt^LU//\H* OV /HOo/Vi'^ ____t *ian\c ~ ly^wpiht I n:aL£s, C - CONFORMING S - SUBSTANDARD N - NONCONFORMING « ••.»I ;»v.-\ .% • ! r • ;l K ‘ f *'• t ^ f LOCATION SKETCH I •. » /vV'- A I lnclyci«y-4)^trf lociitiun 2) DitUnct from houM to leptic tanlrt, dUt. bON. and dram field 3) Nortf'anoi^ and road !»0 V i. I r w ;Cifr^ c *-zr % P^ . VV4 4 Pf f V»“r» £ So/cV C V*w* j.n Pi Swwi^^ M r^rr.-s CPA a U**:^ Pi C t*' A c*;<:a P£ ^;rf- # ^'rnc-e. ‘•C ^*'c*<%* w Ac::*' Aj r.*vO C Ui«5’J AJ P^'-T C K:::k a a A £oi.tCA .•« Vj'i a H4.-ia*i Pg Vi ^.VI r fs^t^^rA P{ se?J. P| ^c"-i:i ? A/^‘Tr.-s*/» >1, C«-4^ C Af •ac-tui f Aj-gw\ Af V.* *r*t Af V :-jri A 9f a;-;j V Jrj A CP V. ^rt^.cr Pi V:*^^ C Af ff V^arc Ai :vy 0 Ag P Af « fsX A» /.V'» A Jf a 9£ Czy w v'of Pf ; Ec-r-f-i ’5 C;V < A« 3 J Cinvrt A| vj'< 0 'A0 >% Pi V fi 0 ;p-kfM Pi I P»*.YnGM.rni Af ■',•'*'1: A£ C4 r 0 A'>>?efi:j Ai P ‘fltf.T *c»fr* Af ^ C yj30 A| G CuKA^)0/< A Cc< vi C>-/*rf Pi C^vy•. A i-rA W Awvvr*:fcy M Ciw^ j^r^\ ^ C'^r^a^ af I Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk& l\J| Associates Engineers & Architects January 12, 1993 Ms. Jsanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Ciy'stal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Open Anns Child Care File No. 139-1795 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the site plan for tlic Open Arms Child Care facility on the Otten property located at the northeast corner of CSAH No. 6 and U.S. Highway No. 12. The two previous entrances are to be abandoned with a proposed drive shown to enter near tlic center of the property off of CSAH No. 6. Portions of the existing and proposed bituminous drive and parking lot encroach onto a small parcel obtained by Hennepin County. The County should review the plan. The existing cuNcrt at the previous entrance off of CSAH N o. 6 should be salvaged and reinstalled under the proposed drive. The proposed fenced in play area of3i,500 square feet will need to be expanded when additional enrollment is added. The future facility is proposed to serve 60 pupils and would require 50 S.F. of play area per pupil which totals 3,000 S.F. The facility is only required to provide 8 parking stalls. The 18 spaces shown arc not necessary' and may impede vehicular traffic in and out of the lot We would recommend a revised parking plan be prepared to show traffic movements through the lot with a reduced number of parking stalls. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very trulv, BONESTROO.* ROSENE, ANT)ERLIK &, ASSOCIATES, INC Shawn D. Gustafson. P E. SDG:li 139.A.cor >,. STATE• * :7'*'aV4- :• •• % • . * *^.'*^*^** • !*•* I •€-. t *• * * m >HENN.t • •*t ••■ ySTA • •' • . * •**• -•• » • / ;. . • • r' v "ZL -I ■' " ■'■r i I ^ m <^i :\. 'a r 5 naB.-aBBB.-T»«.«. 3 r—r»^tratwrr>^ -r — •irx" .i - :rs=-'Xi --------------- 1 sI ^ ^1 _____' _ •• --------■ IJ Ol ‘1»'i• U M X^/ 4 ■rr. \ V \ 7» • V*1:1irf VaS V r K :v 5. T m \ t I n I if. I ?'’l'^Io ^ N ^ /X / O CO H -T 8 !o S51 I ' i::^:i: / ...f-s 4*. i» «! f-‘-O )A w lo 'a \ s*f ». •^ •« I • ♦ • !•% I » ’ x: . •• ■ t . j , . ^ : ' V • i /< TO:Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator From:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager Date:February 2, 1993 Subject: ftl795 LuAnn Walters, 3800 Wayzaca Boulevard - Septic Review The applicant proposes to use the existing principal structure as a day care center/school including a kitchen area for up to 60 occupants on a daily basis. From the University of Minnesota and the Pollution Control Agency On-Site Sewage Treatment Manual, the septic system should be sized as a school or church with a cafeteria as it is tne nearest comparison. The applicant would also like to provide catered dinners for students and their families. This use would require additional treatment capacity. With the intended daily occupation of 70 people, including staff and children, the system must be sized to treat 1,650 gallons per day including the catering service or 1,190 gallons per day without catering. The existing septic system consists of three pre-cast concrete septic tanks and” a mound-type drainfield installed in 1982. The system is code conforming, however, based on the projected waste load, tne septic system is too small. The existing system would be sufficient for nc more than 3 0 people on a daily bar is including the catering service or 38 people without catering. An alternate site is not required for an existing dwelling, however, if apolicant expands the operation for up to 70 people, the required system expansion would prohibit an alternate site. The use cf the property will only be permitted as long as the septic system remains conforming. Soil testing and system design must be submitted to the City indicating suitable area for any usage greater than existing system capabilities. A water meter installation will be required to gauge actual usage in addition. Based on the above information, I would recomme.nd approval of the conditional use permit provided that suitable soil testing and sept'.ic design information is submitted and ipproved by staff. Isv m Bonestroo Rosene AnderlikA 1^1 Associates Engineers & Architects Otto G ft^r e^troc Pi \A' PE • iO.epn C p£ VJivm L jCr'..t:J P£ E Tu»r«#f B Ccc*i PE Tncrrji £ PE Bcoen G Vchuns.rr p£ M EC^^»n CPA •Ven.o» A iarfonJ P£ •cr (h A Gordon P£ Petr'? P PVArr^e PE Pi r.t.j '.V Knif' PE D4v*0 O Lovilo?a P£ BOCV"T C A I A Jr'% A 80o\fCO PE Mar* A Hjriion P£ M<^aei T P.iuir^anr' PE TeJ K P-ed PE Tnomas P a a DonakJ C Butgardt PE Thomas £ AP9UV Pf. Vj't nei PE MAhaci F B.»ii Pf Aijnes M Brg A IC P T»v?r«.is \V P£ Vt/^.ie!C L.n;-'’ pf Jarres P Vaaro F£ .e*rv D Pf't:?:h P£ p Afj^»*on P£ Mj'Ii P ROA P£ Mark A itiQ PE Gjf\ W P£ Da''-ri J Ej^r'tcn Pf Daryl K Ktncr^rnrr^n PE PhH) J Cara,r< PE Mark O 'A.v s PE M«e^ B >envpn P£ I P^ P Grav^ M PE Ka*^ L Pf Jaf> D • %\v :x p£ Tcy>t foster Pf «et*' P rapp PE Shawr' D Gusufu^ I Cecio Ovfv<^ PE Chanei A f'KkvDo Leo M PaArt*ky Haran St C son >amei f Engeina«TJt M- I'cbruarv 4, 1913 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabustli Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Cr)'stal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Open Arms Child Care File No. 139-1795 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the revised Jte plan for the Open Arms Child Ciire facility on the Otten property. Tlie parking lot layout is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. We would recommend that the lot be constructed v ith concrete curb and gutter along the perimeter as shown on the attached sketch. !i a raised concrete sidewalk is proposed along the building, it will function as a curb line, and imly the portion of the lot adjacent tc CSAU No. 6 and U.S. Highway No. 12 would need curb. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours ver>' truly. BONES! ROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Uw> }h MuUk Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. SDGli I39A.cor 233s West Highway 36 • St. Paul Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 / / 1 ♦ / .6^ N /o / % cr '.'1 m oo , (f) f t-N » & « ! J> r / I % (\ :> ft: I t . > o ; X Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects Januarv 19,1993 ¥ City of Orono Box 66 Crvstal Bav, Minnesota 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Otto G RoC^rt W ROsrne Pi • C Ardehik Pi Mjrv»n L PE P<r^jra £ P£ GJenn R Cock Pi Themes F Nc>^v PE Rct^'l G PE Sown M C PA •Senof CooUiAJnt A Sjr»p'd. PE Kritn A GortJon Pi •iocen R PfePrr^e PE P^^^rd'X Fc\re' PE Djv<3 O Lo^kou PE Rocen C Russe* A t a :e^ A Bourdon PE A Hjnsoo PE M<hae< T RiiAmdnn PE >(J A F<d PE rrx)rnjs R Aryjenon A I A Donjtd C PE Thomas E Angul PE M^mne/ PE P PE Agnei M Rirvg A IC P Tf'cyrji \A‘ Pre'Trn Pi C s»' PE P PE 0 FV'tnch PE P Ar^eryyn Pi Vj • P Ma.'H A Gary W Djr^ J Eagerc Daryl k Aifjchmman PE Philip J Casv^j.^E p An^ervyn f iaaercr Wm M ies B -e^ien PE L PhOkQ Graven W. PE iCaTH L PE 0 A* /c'V PE F Todd Fc«r' PE Ae-t*' R vapo PE Shawvn O GofljFJCn J CfC'*o Oirvef PE Charles A ErxAson Leo M Pj^sky M Otson aide m I \i :^k^- ««! - —% Re: 400.000 Gallon Elevated Tank Our File No. 13954 Dear John: Enclosed herewith are three signed copies of Request for Payment No. 4 for the above referenced project. Tlie request is in the amount of $94,767.25 and includes payment primarily for the tank painting. VVe have reviewed this request and find it to be in order. We therefore recommend payment to PDM, Inc. in the amount of $94,767.25. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Very Truly Yours, 233S West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota S51I3 • 612-63^4600 Bonestroo Roitne Owner City of Orono, 1335 Rr*»wn Kd S, 1*0 Hox 66, C'rystal, MN 55323 Date December 21, 1992 Anderiik A |\j| AsioctJiei h'or Period September 14, I9‘)2 to October 21, 1962 Ueque^it No. 4 ConUaetor l*itt-Des Moines, Inc., I’O Ib)x 1596, Dcs Moines. lA 50306 iU-OU|{i>T 1-OR I'AYMI-N'r 400,000 Gallon Hlcvatcd Water Sloi.igc Tank l-ilc No. I.VJ54 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount $59.5,150.00 o Change Order - Addition S .3 Change Order • Deduction $ 4 Revised Contract /Vmouot $595,150.00 5 Value Completed to Date $525,110.00 6 Material on Hand $0.00 7 /\mount flamed $525,110.00 8 Less Retainage 5%$26,255.50 9 Sub-'rotal S 498,854.50 10 Less Amount Laid Previously $404.087.25 11 AMOUNT DUE 'll IIS REQUE.ST FOR PAYMllNT NO.4 S 94,767.25 Recommended for Approval by: HONIiSmOO, ROSI-NI-; ANDF.RI.LK & ASSCXTIAIl-S, INC. Approved by Contractor: ITlT-DliS MOINI-S, INC Approved by Owner: CriY OR ORONO, MN .Specified Contract ('ompiction Date: NovF-MorR 30. I9V2 Dale: 13954.ru* No.Item ItiJ A • 4(K).0(K) Mulct! rolmnn or Hvdroniilnr Water Tower 141.0 feet to High Water Level Furnish and instali a complete elevated water storage tank of the fluted columii or bydxopillar design with 40U.000 gallon capacity within 39 feet of the high water level including: 1 Foundation drawings 2 I'ank drawings 3 Access road 4 Piling 5 Concrete foutidaliou 6 Piping 7 Tank fabrication 8 Tank erection 9 Electrical 10 Painting 11 Cathodic protection system 12 Sitework Total Hid A Hid A - Unit Price 13 Foundation piling unit price for difference between design and actual total pile length • VOID; modified by Change Order No. 1 Hid A > Alternate No. I 14 I'uruish iV install a 6* x 7* ikiuble A 3T in lieu of specif. 3* X T |)edcstnaa door Uuil Coulracl Ouanliiy Uoil 1*1 ice Ouantiiy lo Date 3.000.00 :oo% Amounl To Dale IS 1 .-J.aoo.oo iooc:!i 5.100.00 LS I 16.200.00 100%16.200.00 LS 1 18.400.00 100%18.400.00 IJ5 1 58.350.00 100%58.350.00 Ii>1 31.<>00.00 100%31.600.00 lii 1 4.800.00 100%4.800.00 I.S 1 192.000.00 95%182.400.00 LS 1 113.900.00 95%108.205.00 LS 1 73.500.00 40%29.400.00 LS 1 70.‘X)0.00 95%67J55.00 LS 1 4.800.00 IS 1 2J00.00 $592,150.00 $522,110.00 LF 20.00 ADD i.r 3.00 DLDUCT SO^OIJ 3.0U0.00 i 1 <14 HFP !<l'l llcoi Unit C!on tract Quaiility Unit IV ICC Quaatiiy 'Ici Date Amuuut ro Dale Ch.iuiic Order No. 1 BiJ A - Uait Price 15 Fouudatioii piling unit price for difference belvseen approved design and actual total pile length in lieu of S2U/LB’ ADD for add*l length and $J/U^" DIZDUCT for reduced length 16 Foundation piling unit price for each pile over 80 feet in length Total Change Order No. 1 IT lLr\ (10)SKIUO $100.00 (10)(100.00) SO.OO Total Bid A Unit Price Alternate No. 1 Totnl Change Order No. 1 *^otnl Work Completed to Date 522.110.00 0.00 3.000.00 _____Q1H1_ $525,110.00 I WV HH*UP 2 PROJr-Cr PAYMI-N'r ifTATUS Owner City of Orono Project 400,000 Gallon Blcvalcd Water Storage Tank Project No. rnc No. i.i9.*;4 Contractor Pitt-Des Moine.s, Inc. aiANfilt ORDliRS Nu. Date I 2-20-92 Modify unit price on foundation piling 'I'utal Change Orders - Add PAYMl-NT SUMMARY No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Period Start 5-5-92 8- 21-92 9- 14-92 5-5-92 8- 21-92 9- 14.‘>2 10-21-92 Total Pa>'ment to Date Retainage, Payment No. Ti;tal Value ('ompletcd Payment $94,130.75 130,492.00 179,464.50 94,767.25 S498,854_50 26.255.50 S525.no 00 Kclainago $4,954.25 11,822.75 2U67.75 26 h155J0 Original Contract Change Orders Rcviiked Contriu:t Amount $0.00 50.00 Complcteo $99,085.00 236.445.00 425355.00 525.110.00 $595,150.00 04X) $595,150.00 1 I.WS4 HI l»RP 3 Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates EngineciS & Architects Feliruars' 3, 1993 City of Oiono 1335 Brown Road Crvstal Bav. MN 55323 Orro G Bor^stroo W P£ • C Arc>'- • Pf Mjrv.n L Vvvj j Pi B Turner PB G*eon ff PB B \oyr\ PE PooefT G VtHiC<r,t P£ SiiUn M 6tVhn. C PA Attn:Mr. John Gerhardson Public W'orks Director A Pf r^tt' • Gordon Pt S Pf P«ch4f?J X* Fc’Wpf PS O^d O P!r C PLSVfii A I A je'^ f A ^ix.'TJon P£ M*rii A Hsnujn PE M«chjr« T Pjurrrjnr PE Vi K f-rd PE Thomii p Arxje^Vjr ^ A OonjkJ C Bur^idl P£ Thor^ii E Ar^Ln PE fyrs^ Mat n<.* PE P fau PE P r^j A IC P Tr'Cfnsi X PpfP'Vort PE Mc^pe' C Lync'' PE P •AAiprvJ PE >'% D P>*'T4*v PE ffh P •' ..Jf'V3n Pf Mjffc P Pf Mjr» A PE W M t^r> PE Dsr.iet j Ec ,rror PE Dpryi K Kochenmjft PE P^Ap i PE Mjrli C X>H.v Pf Mies B >erven P£ L P^:»lf> G'-MT^ ill PE Orpn L PE GA'y O A/tMcyti PE E Todd Poster Pt ^efh P Pf V'Awwn D GuWA^on 1 CetiPo Ovier PI Chjnes A fryvson Le'o M P,Mr u^ HjfUf M C von JUn^l f krvjemArtJI Re:Stubbs 13av Sanitary Sewer Improvements File No. 13937 Dear Mr. Gerhardson: Please find enclosed three (3) copies of Request for Payment No. 5 for the above mentioned project for your further handling. Tliis portion of the work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend pavanent at this time. Upt)n approval, we suggest the following distribution: 1 copy - 1 copy - 1 copy - City Bonestroo PC'I with payment Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. Yours ver\ trulv, BONhSI R(> ». !»< r>FNH. ANDFRL IK .S: ASSOCIATES, INC. Harlan M. Obon llMO;pah:enc lW37.mR 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, IMlnntsota SSI 13 • 612*636^400 r t/'t fiontitfoe IIOS«f>€ Owner City ol Orono. 1335 Frown Ko rd, C rystal Hay. MN 5.^232 Dale 1‘ebrua.y' 3, 1993 Ander^.ik & AfsoclJtes luir Period November 18, 1992 to |•■ebruary 3, 1993 Rci{ucst No. S Invvwn « iVcfMKU 1 Conti ;ictor Pr«>gressi''c Contractors. Inc., 8736 Zachary l ane, Osseo, MN 55369 -—— ___________1 UliOUIvS ’r I’OR PAYMIOT Stubbs H:iv Sanitary Scwcr Improvements File N»>. 13937 SUMNUKY 1 Original Contract /Vniount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order • Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand S i 43,991.60 7 y\mount Famed 8 I.ess R<'tainage 5% 9 Sub-Total 10 I.ess Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUN'r DUF 11 US RFOUFSI I'OU PAYMI-N 1 NO Rrarmmcndcd tor .\pprm al by: aONI-S’l’Rt)^; JIOSI J^^ ANDFRJ.IK & ASSOCLAnSS. INC. Approved by Contractor; PROGKFSSIVF CON-IRACIDRS, INC Approved by OvMier: CIIY Ol- bkONO. MN Specified Contract C'ompletion Date: 0«-Iout it 15, 1992; July 31. 1993 Date: 1,480.331.95 $1,524,323.55 s 1,116.273.22 s 0.00 $1.116.27.3.22 $55,813.66 $1.060.459.56 s 9t)9,859.39 $90,600.17 I Wl? M> P Itcni Uuii C*4)nt/act OuaiiUly Unit l*ricc Ouanlily To Dale Amount To Dale MASF tMl) • Stubt>^ Hay Northwest. StuMx Hay Nortlicast. and HaysiJe f:ast Part A » Sanitary Sevier 1 r PVC, SDH 35. J’-8 ’ deep lu plaec 2 8* PVC. SDR 35. 8*-10’ deep in place 3 8" PVC. SDR 35, lO’-ir deep in place 4 8" PVC. SDR 35. ir-14 ’ deep in place 5 8" PVC. SDR 35. 14 ’-16* deep in place 6 8" 1*VC. SDR 26. S’-lO* deep in place 7 8" I’VC, SDR 26, 10’-12' deep ui place 8 8" PVC, SDR 26, 12 ’-14 ’ deep in place 9 8* PVC. SDR 26. 14'.I6* deep in place 10 8" PVC. SDR 26, 16 ’*I8* deep iu place 11 8" PVC, SDR 26, 18 ’-20 ’ deep iu place 12 8" PVC, SDR 26, 20*-22 ’ deep in piacc 13 8" DIP, 8 ’-10’ deep in pl.aee 14 8" DIP, 10'-12'deep in place 15 8-I)IP. ir-14 ’decpin place 16 10" PVC. SDR 35, 0’-8* deep in place 17 10" PVC. SDR 35. 8 ’-10' deep in place 18 10" PVC, SDR 35. 10’-12 ’ deep in place 19 10" PVC. SDR 35, 12 ’-14 ’ deep in place 20 10" PVC, SDR 35, I4'-l6 ’ deep in place 21 10* PVC. SDR 26. 12 ’-14 ’ deep in place 22 10* P\'C, SDR 26, 14 ’-16 ’ deep in place ,23 10* PVC, SDR 26, 16 ’-18 ’ deep in place 24 lO* PVC. SDR 26, I8 ’-20 ’ deep in place 25 10* DIP, 14 ’-16 ’ deep iu place 26 Sid. Ml I 8 ’ dp.. 4 ’ dia., w/R1642b cslj. 27 Mil dcpib greater than 8 ’ deep 28 8" DIP. uuUule drup 29 6 ’ PV(*. SDR 21. lorco moiii 30 Jock or auger 6* PVC, SDR 21 force mam 31 4* PV'C, SDR 21, fiuce main 32 Air rrkasa manboln 33 Rmk slabiluatioa I R» P IJ-615 1400 755 10..i70.00 IJ-1.775 14.00 1,806 25.284.00 u-1.175 15.00 1.014 I 5m! 10.00 U'225 16.00 I?U 2,880.00 IJ^230 17.50 347 6.072.50 LF 55 15.00 U-125 16.00 118 1.888.00 LF 355 17.00 182 3.094.00 LF 300 18.50 734 13.579.00 310 20.0U 122 2440.00 LF 315 23.00 250 5.750.00 U'D5 27.00 169 42? 63.00 LF 120 2200 LF 30 23.<K)162 3.726.00 U-35 24.00 20.5 492.00 U-425 L^.SO 415 6.432..50 LF 130 15.10 25 387.50 LF 105 16.50 171 2.821.50 U-340 18.-X)2T7 4.9P6.00 135 19.50 49 9.55JI0 IP 245.19.00 421 7.999.00 U-440 20.50 453 92!86..50 IP 405 23.00 300 6.900.00 LF 40 27.00 35 945.00 IP 30 31.50 30 945i» "•A 36 1 J50.00 36 48.600.00 LF 140 90.00 152.2 13.698.00 IP 25 250.00 19.2 4J0U.00 IP 900 11.00 933 10.263 00 U-60 130.00 105 13.650.00 IJf 2.81X1 10.00 2.675 26,750.00 F-\1 2000.00 1 23XX) OOl I.N 500 II.to 331.12 3.675 43 RP-1 Item 34 Coaucci 6" PVC into existtjg manhole 35 8"x4*' PVC service wye branch 36 4" PVC service pipe in place 37 4" PVC service riser pipe in place 38 luipruvcd pi|>e fdu. in 6" iucrcmcnl Jenth 39 Mechanical trench uinipaction 40 Detour per detail 4! Insulation 42 Sanitary sewer television inspection 43 A*jcc%s manhole (Addendum 2) Total Pari A • Sanitary Sewer Part B * Restoration 44 Rituniinous surfacing rcraoval 45 Common excavation 46 CL 5 aggregate base (100% crushed) 47 CL 2, aggregate shouldering 48 Type 31 biluuunous base course 49 Type 41 bituniuious binder coune 50 Type 41 bituaiinous wranng course 51 AC-1 bituminous material for inu 52 Oituminous materiai fur tack coat 53 nflummous material for seal coat 54 F’A-3 seal aiai aggregate (Cl. A) to pL 55 Uituminuus material for patching 56 12" RCT, Class 3 in place 57 18" RCP. Class 3 in place 58 24" RCP. Clas.s 3 in place 59 36 ’* RCP, Class 3 in place 60 12* RCP Hared end in place 61 18* RCT flared end in place 62 24" KCl* flared cod w/trasb guard in pi. 63 36* RCT flared end w trash guard to pi, 64 Mechamcal trench ci>uip idiot} 65 In'pr. pi|)c (du. ui 6* lovrerticul Jcptb 66 Remove exiting I'Ml* cuhert lJ9J7RFf RP-2 Unit (4iaU.u4 Uu^uitity Unit Price Ouaniiiy To l)jtc Aniount I'o Datci HA I 400.00 1 400.0O HA 85 60.00 84 5.040.00 U-2.100 11.50 1 .950 22.425.00 IJ-too 11.50 78 897.00 U'24.(X)0 1.40 20.115 28.161.00 U-1 4.875 1.00 13.593.5 13.593.50 I.S I 6.000.00 1 6.000.00 SY 300 20.00 U-8.075 0.60 7.985 4.791.00 n.\I 1.500.00 1 1.5m nn S343.450.93 SY 11,000 1.75 10.000 17.500 00 CY 6.000 3.70 5,800 21.460.00 IN 7.800 8.50 6.0.55.6 51.47160 TN 4<XJ 12.50 507.3 6 J41.15 TN 1 400 14 50 502.72 7J*89.44 TN 450 1.5.00 588.15 8.823.75 TN 1.000 16.00 23 ^68.00 TN '67 120.00 61.26 7J5I.20 (;l UOO UO 100 13UJ)0 GI,1.400 3.00 IN 70 50.00 SY 1.000 22.00 206 4.53100 IJ-ISO 17.50 518 9.0(i5 00 U-75 20.50 50 25 m IJ-40 43.45 HA 10 365.00 I{A 4 410.00 HA ■» *■1.005.00 lA n 1.660.00 u-315 1.00 IJ^300 2.00 IJ-315 3 00 260 78CJJ0 i Item 67 Filler blaukcl in place 68 Riprap. CL III in place •69 Tree rcuinvai 70 Sud with 4" topsuil 71 Seed w/lopsoil, mulch & fertilizer 72 Frosiuo couirni fence 73 Wood fiber blanket 74 Furui^h uud plaut Evergreen tree (Blue Spruce) 6' high 75 FuruLsh and plant shadi tree (Sugar Maple) 4 ‘ diamete. 76 Remove A. repl. wood or chain link fence 77 Remove A trausplaut be hes 78 Remove A trausplaut tree • Desiduous 79 Remove A transplant tree • Coniferous 80 Geolextilc fabric (Addendum 2) Total Fart U • Restoraliou Part C - IJft Station #1 • West Lake St. 81 Lift Station No. I ■I'otal l‘arl C • lift Sta. #1 • W Lake Su Part D • lift Station #2 • T<»nka Avenue 82 lift Statioa No. 2 1 otal Karl D - Lift Sta, # 2 • Touka Av Unit (^oUact Ui.it Ouanlily Aiuuuut rjuantily 1*1 ice To Dale To Dale SY 200 2J0 SY 200 45.00 11\175 115.00 151 18.875.00 SY 14.000 2.00 2.475 4.950 00 AC 4 800.00 1.5 l.2iX).oo LF 4.500 2.00 5.50 1.100.00 SY 1.500 I.IO 1.240 1.3(4.00 £A 6 350.00 'iA 6 350.00 U-600 10.00 ILr\12 50.00 Fj\12 100.00 FiA 12 100.00 SY 15.000 1.50 14.135 ___21,207 50 $in.804.74 LS 1 60.400.00 807f 48;j'>onn S48J20.0U LS 1 50.350.00 S0%40 2.80 00 S40.2S0.00 Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer 1'ulal Part U • Restoration Total Part C • LS. # 1 • West larke St. Total Pari 1) • L.S. #2 • Tonka Avenue l OTAI. BASE BID 343.450.93 i 83.804.74 48.320.00 4a?mnn S615.855.67 AI.TFRNATl- NO. 1 BI DFRWOOD Part A • S.uii.arv Sewer S3 8* PVC. SDR 35. 0*-8’ deep in place 84 8- PVC. SDR 35. 8‘10* deep in place LF IF 615 405 13.00 13.00 237 476 33)81.00 6.188 00 13937 RIP Rl*-3 Item 85 8" PVC. SDK 35. 10’-12’ deep in pfacc 86 8" PVC, SDR 35. deep in pl.ice 87 8" PVC. SDR 35. 14’-16* deep in plate 88 8 ’ PVC. SDR 26. 0’-8* deep in plate 89 8" PVC. SDR 26. 8'-10 ’ deep in place 90 8" PVC. SDR 26. 10’-12* deep in place 91 8" PVC. SDR 26. I2’-14* deep in plate 92 r PVC, SDR 26. 14’-16’ deep in plate 93 8- PVC. SDR 26. 16’-18 ’ deep in pl.icc 94 8 ’ PVC. SDR 26. 18 ’-20’ deep in place 95 8" PVC. SDR 26. 20’-22’ deep in plate 96 8" DIP, 8 ’-10’ ticcp in place 97 8" DIP, I0’.|2’ deep in pl.icc 98 Sid. MH 8* dfi.. 4’ dia.. W/R1642B csig. 99 Manliole deplli greater tbaii 3* deep 100 4" PVC. SDR 21. force aiaai 101 8" X 4’ PVC scr>icc wye branch 102 4* PVC service pipe in place 103 4* PVC service riser pipe in plate 104 Methauital Iteuth tutupatliuu lO.S Improved pipe (dn. in 6" increment depth 106 Rock stabili/aiion 107 Sanitary sewer television ins|'>cttiuii Total Part A • Sanitary Sewer P.irt n • Restoration <!uaUatl Uoii Uu4iiitity Alutiuul Unit Ouaiibly Puce 'l*u IXiU:To Dale LF 170 14.00 556 7.784.00 LF 25 15.50 51 7902)0 LF 20 17.00 119 2.013.00 U*25 14.00 U'50 14.00 LI-30 14.00 LF 25 15.00 U-165 16.50 33 544.5G U-215 18.00 180 3240.0f 30 22.00 55 U 10.0*1 LJ^50 26.00 35 910.0.J U-20 20.00 20 400.00 u-20 20.00 F/\10 IJ.50.00 12 i6.:cooo u-28 90.00 41.5 3.''35.J0 U-':’0 L5.00 60 900 00 liA 13 60.00 9 540.00 LF 4 lO 15.00 310 4.6‘if.flO LF 40 15 00 20 30i).00 LF 2.415 1.0*3 2J52 2;<52.00 LF 4.000 1.50 1.700 25.‘0.00 TN 100 11.00 u-1.888 0.65 1.742 LT3‘»30 $)8.)30 30 108 Uiluuiiiioujk icuutval SY 1.100 2.00 950 .900.00 1(N Commua excavatiuu CY 500 5.70 400 2J80.00 no Ckss 5 aggregate base (lOO^t CTUsbcd)TN 700 9.00 700 62J00.00 III T*pc 31 biluuiiuou.s base course TN 200 19.00 112 Ty(>c 41 btlummous buidcr couisc IN 10 23.00 111 T>pc 41 btiuniuiotts v^cahiig course TN L50 20.00 114 AC-1 bitumuiuus ouurtal for mix TN 19 I20.0C 115 ndumiiious inateriai for laik (if 250 1.50 lib Tree removal 1-A 50 115.00 50 6150.00 117 Hituminous material for patcljiug ,SY 500 21(30 n«ii7Kf p UP 4 mount i Dairt84.00•li.no flOO i(L00 TO 30 30 SftQQ No.Item Uoil C'iiQtradOuaiiliiy118 Sod with 4" topsoil119 Seed w/lopsoil, mulch &. lerlili/er120 Geotexlile fabric (Addeadum 2) lolal Part B • Restoration Part (: • I ift Station #3 121 Uft Station No. 3 I'otal Part C - Uft Sta #3 Toni Part A • S^’oitaiy Sewer loul Part B - Rc.storation Total Part C • Uft Sta. 3 - Bederwoed TOTAL AL31ERNATE NO. I - BHDnRWOOD ai ^THRN a it: no . 2 • HAYSinn nc /rtm Part A • Sanitary Sewer Unitl»ria:Ou^nliiy To Date Aflioujjl 'lb DateSY32002.00AC1.0 800.00SY1.100 120 1.000 $18230.00 40.4.‘50.00 80-7?..12.100 0*I_ S32260.00 .*58230.30 18.110.00 _12J6£LQ(L. $109,120.30 122 S'* PVC, SDR 35, 0*-8* deep i.n place Ll-140 13.00 123 8- PVC. SDR 35. 8*-10 ’ deep in place U-211 1.1.00 124 8* PVC, SDR 35, 10 ’.12’ deep m •)lacc LF 8.S 14.00 125 8 PVC. SDR 35, 12*-14* deep in place I-F 21*5 I5..10 126 Std. Mil 8’ dp., 4’ dia., W/R1642B cstg.R/\3 1250.00 127 Mauliulc deplb greater than 8’ deep U'6 90.(X) 128 8" DIP, outside drop U-62 110.00 129 8" X 4" PV'C service wye braucL EA 6 60.00 130 4’ PVC service pi|)c in place U-10.1 15.00 131 4" PV'C Service riser pi|>e in place U-10 15.00 132 Improved pipe fdu. in 6" increment depth IJ-.100 2.00 133 Mechanical trench coinpaclion U-810 1.00 134 Sanitary sewer television kispcirioa (Addeudum 2)It 675 0.65 Total Part A - Sanitary Sewer Part H • Restoration 13.^ Tree rrmoval IiA 111.00 135 Sod with 4* to|>soiJ SY 2.000 2.00 $01)0 13«7 RFP RP-5 \r IlCffl l*art H - Restoration 164 Rcuiuvc existiug biluiniiious 165 Cumuiou cxcavatiou 166 Chiss 5 aggregate base (100% crushed) 167 Ty|)e 31 bituminous base course 168 Type 41 bituuiiuous wcunug course 169 AC-1 bilumiuous material fur mix 170 Bituminous material for tack coat 171 Bituminous material for patching 172 12" RCP. Class 5 in place 173 15" RCP. Chiss 4 in place 174 18" RCP. Class 4 in place 175 33" RCP, Class 3 in place 176 48" RCP. Class 3 in place 177 12" RCP flared end in place 178 15“ RCP flared eud in place 179 18" RCP flared end in place 180 33" RCP flared end w/trash guard in pi. 181 48" RCP flared end w/trash guard in pi. 182 Mechauica! .teuch compaction 183 Impr. pipe fdn. in 6’ increment depth 184 Remove existing CMP cuK'crl 185 Filter blanket in place 186 Riprap in place 187 Tree removal 188 Sod with 4" lo|tsoil 189 Seed with topsoil, mulch & fertilizer 190 Geotextile fabric (Addendum 2) lotai Part U • Restoration I'otal Part A - Sanitary Sewer Total Part B - Restoration rOTAl ALll RNA lTi NO. 3 • CYGNtn PIACF n«M7 Ki t* llnil SY CY TN TN TN TN GL SY LF LF U' LF FA FA Ei\ I-A F.y\ IJ' U- LF SY CY liA SY AC SY RP-7 Cuol/ael Quantity 10,800 4.500 6.000 1.500 1.200 160 750 300 300 30 75 100 80 12 -> 4 -)mm 495 400 4*^5 25 SO 15 7.500 2.0 5.500 Unit IVice 1.80 4.40 8.50 14.50 15.50 120.00 L.5C 210J 17.50 19.30 21.00 3.'i.00 81.00 365.00 390.00 410.00 2.500.00 2.665 .tK) 1.00 2.00 300 2.50 50.00 1254)0 2.00 800.00 1.50 Ouaalily iti Date 9.780 4.300 6.000 175 30 70 80 2 -> 150 150 250 5.0)0 Ainoiiol 'to Date 17 604.00 18.920.o0 51.000.00 3.062.50 570.00 2J10.00 6.480.00 5,000.00 5J30.00 150.00 300.00 750.00 1.615.00 7 <ifiti nn S 120.601.50 1.53.495.4.5 $274,U9f>.95 k_ Item Unit ('vonlracl OuanlJly Uotl l*ricc Oiuoiity 'lb Dale Aftinuiil Tu l)jlc Al.TCRNAnt NO. 5 - OXI ORD ROAD Part A » Sanitary* Sewer 191 8 PVC , SDR 35, 10*-12* deep to place 192 S’* PVC, SDR 35, 12*-14* deep in place 193 8" PVC, S( R 35, 14*-16* deep iu place 194 8” PVC, SDR 35, 16*-18* deep in place 195 Sid. MH 8* dp., 4* dia., W/R1642M csig, 196 MU depth greater than 8* deep 197 8”x4** PVC' service wye branch 198 4" PV'C service pipe in place 199 4" PVC service riser pij>c io place 200 Improved pipe fdo. iu 6" iucremeut depth 201 Mecliauical trench compaciiuo 202 Sanitary sewer television inspection Total P:.rt A - Sanitary Sewer LI*675 13.00 .398 5,174.00 u-400 14.50 .370 5.365.00 LF 150 17.00 300 5.100.00 U'200 20.00 50 1.000.00 EA 5 U50.00 5 6.750.00 LF 28 90.00 1.998.00 IZ/\12 60.00 13 780.00 LF 500 12.00 3W 4.680.00 U*40 1100 25 300.00 LF 2.000 2.00 i.:i8 2.236.00 IJ'1.915 1.00 L50.S 1,508.00 U-1.415 0.65 1.118 776 70 $35,617.70 Part M * Restoration! 203 Bituminous surfacing removal SY 4.100 2.00 .3.960 7.920.00 204 CTouunon excavation CY 1.600 4.60 1,510 6.946.00 205 CL 5 aggregate base (100% crushed)TN 2J00 8-50 2.150 19.115.00 206 T>T5c 31 bituminous base course TN 400 16.00 207 Ty|>c 41 biiummous weanng course IN 300 18.00 208 AC-l bituuiiuous material for mix IN 42 120.00 20^ Bituminous materul for tack laial CiL 235 UO 2i0 Bituniuious rnatcrtal for patching SY ISO 22.00 211 Tree removal EA 3 125.00 212 Sod with 4" to|)suil SY 4,000 100 213 Seed w/topsoil« oiulch A fcnilrzer AC 0.5 800.00 214 L^rostun coutrol fence LF 200 2.00 215 (leutcxtile fabric (Addendum 2)SY 2,500 1.50 2.400 36onon Total Part B • Resturatiyu $37,591 oo rotaj Part A • Sanitary Sewer 35.517.70 Total Part R • Restoration 17 5Q1 (V» rai AL Ain rna it: no . 5 - oxford road $73^08.70 13937 RF?RP 8 Item Unit CxHitraLl Ou«uility Uml PricTC Otiartjty To lUlc rhant^o Order No. I imrurp Amnunl To Date 216 Modify Lift Slalioti No. 3 L<;I 9 J 90.00 I ____9J90.00 Total Change Order No. 1 S9.390.00 rhaii2C Order No. 2 217 Jack 4" services under CSAH #84 IJ^2.S0 65.00 250 16.150.00 218 Oranular borrow CY 2.000 8„50 2.000 17.000.00 219 4“ Striping, white paint IT'6.758 0.20 6.758 _____UiLfiJ Total Change Order No. 2 $34.60I.()0 Total liase Bid 615.855.67 Total Alternate No. 1 - Uederwood 109.120.30 Total Allernafc No. 2 • Bay'sidc North 0.00 Total Alternate No. 3 • Cygnet Place 2743)96.95 Total Alternate No. 5 - Oxford Road 73,208.70 Total Change Order No. 1 9J90.00 Total Change Order No. 2 rill <sn TOri\L WORK COMPUrrCD TO DATE $1,116,273.22 PROJI-CT PAYMI-NT *tlA’mS Owner City of Orono Project Stubbs Hay Sanitary Sewt r Project No. I’ilc No. 13937 Contractor Progressive Contractors, Inc. c HANOI? ordi :rs No. Date 1 7-8-92 Modify Lift Station #3 2 11-4-92 Jack services, granular K)rrow, striping 'I'otal Change Orders - Add paymi ;nt summary 6 7 8 9 10 I'otol Payment to Date ketainage, Pa^nnent No. Total Amount I-arned 1.060,459.56 55.813.66 1.116.273.22 Original Conlracl Cl.angc Ordcrt Revised C'ontroct iJvJt lu p Amount S9.390.00 $34,601.60 $43,991.60 No.Period Payment Retainage Ctmiplcrtcii 1 Start 8-7-92 $116,255.77 $6,118.73 $96,918.04 S-7-92 9-8-92 305,777.08 22,212.26 444,245.11 3 9-8-92 10-I3-92 272,411.08 36,549.68 730,993.61 4 10*13-92 11-18-92 275,415.46 51,045.23 1,020,904 62 5 11-18-92 2-3-93 90,600.17 .55,813.66 1,111,627.22 I.480.5.3I.95 43.991 60 1.524.323 35 RP 10 /3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ron Moorse. City Admini:.traior \ John R. Gerhardson. Public Works Director r ^ t 'Vi>» * ri February 4, 1993 Highway 12 Safety Improvement Brown Road North 1500 l eet \Vc<f<7 of Willow Drive % ■ For several years the City of Orono and Long Lake have been waiting for the installation of a semapho-e at the intersection of Willow Drive and Highway 12. In addition to the semaphore instaUation other improvements were considered such as turn lanes and center island medians at certain intersections between Brown Road iNorth and 1500 feet west of Willow Drive. The construction of this project was originally scheduled for 1993. MnDOT advised us in 1992 that consiraction would be delayed until 1994. Most recently we were advised that another delay would extend construction to 1995. During the entire process, the City of Orono has been planning to upgrade Willow Drise from Highway 12 to County Road 6 to Municipal State Aid standards and tried to coordinate that construction w ith the semaphore installation by Mn/DOT at the intersection of Willow Drive and Highway 12. A feasibility study was completed by the City Engineer in July of 1992 but was put on hold until more information was available from Mn/DOT regarding their safety improvement project. It was also suggested that the City of Orono proceed with the Willow Drive upgrade and install the semaphore in our project and would be reimbursed by Mn/DOT for their share " the semaphore costs. Due to :he time of year that consideration was put on hold until we *d meet w ith Mn/.OOT and perhaps continue the negotiations with them for a cooperative agrew...ent and construction in 1993. Attached you will fttiu a letter from City Engineer Glenn Cook summarizing our meeting with Ma'DOT personnel regarding cooperative agreement monies and the tact that they do not want to iiKtude the semaphore ccnstrucuon in our project. It is staff recommendation to proceed with the upgrade of Willow' Drive from Highway l^. to County Road 6 in 1993 and to present tlie feasibility snidy to Council at the February' 22. 1993 Council meeting. ch r Rosene AnderllkA 1 \| 1 Associates Engineers & Architects Ona Q •enerro ^1 ioofft w nDtfrt PE* /Offon C. Ardefkh. f | Mj/vm I l.;hg^ I Turner. t| Ci'enn M Coot f f Tro'fii I. Noyai 0 k*'s#^W ei Wwf^ M C PA •ifotof cootoKinc February 4, 1993 HQMIrl^A Pk NMh A Oofdon PI •QMft I Pinife. PI. W Poitff. PI Oerid O P| tgCta C iuMfi AiA Jerry a lot^^ion, PI Men A Minion. PI. V<MT T PI rtc R Pcid. PI Thorffi I Anoerwrv AfA C. IwTilOL PI Thonrtji f. Pl i|rr^K‘ Merwi. PI M<n»e< P liu. P| A^yin M Ming. A jCP. Trorr.4i W. Pfwrwn. Pi C io>^>ch Pi ;|AVI I Ml lAd, Pi Jer7 D Pi'tntrt, PC a#r>ntin P. Ange'wn. P| Vjrl I tgPl. PE Mi * A sri:i PI cj «7 w. Morea Pi Djn^ JL Edyrton. PC, Or/ P Pi PnJip J Ciiwpf. PI Mert O UOJWV P£. MPfl A Jtnipfv PI. 1. ^ifip lA Pt. ICiien L. aiemert Pf. Opry O ernoPci Pf f 'MO POIIfr PI IMdi I Vkim PC STArvn 0 Oi^iuPion, PI CeeAo Oiiv»f. Pi Cnirift A £' tfciun Lt9 M Prr^ I*/ HiniA M Ciloo ;in*fi • IngrrjrCt City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: File No. 139 Willow Drive Dear John, This letter provides a summary of our meeting with Mn/DOT relative to the traffic signal at T.H. 12 and Willow Drive. We have also summarized the issues on Willow Drive that need to be discussed prior to proceeding with the project Wc met with the West Metro District office staff on Wednesday, January 23, 1993. The purpose of the meeting was to determine the advantages of advancing the construction schedule for the traffic signal Mn/DOT has currently scheduled a bid date on the project of October 1994 which means 1995 construction. The City could accomplish construction of a temporary signal in 1993 with Ma^DOT cooperative agreement funds. The Mn/DOT staff was resistive to the City proceeding because of work duplication that would result in an additional project cost of approximately 5100,000. The question became, what is the benefit of moving the project ahead two years? If you avoid one serious accident in that time period, the answer is obvious but this is purely speculative. We will check out the areident records for this area over the past two years. Mn/DOT does have control of the cooperative agreement funds so they are an important participant. If the City were to pursue a temporary signal at this location, we would need the cooperation of Long Lake. The estimated cost to each City for the temporary signal and lane widening would be $40,000. The remaining work would be covered under the Mn/DOT cooperative agreement. Each City would be responsible for its share of the permanent traffic control signal when it is installed in the future. This cost is estimated at $25,000 for each City. The City of Orono share for this work can be financed with MSA funds. Page I 139Acor Ills VW«t Highway 16 • Sf. Paul Mmnasota 11113 • 612-6164600 i The Willow Drive construction can proceed with or without the traffic control signal at T.H. 12. We would coordinate our work with the preliminary plan provided by Mn/DOT for the signal. The preliminary report for Willow Drive provides for an urban section for the 500 feet adjacent to T.H. 12 and a rural section to the north. The City staff has discussed the need for a pathway along Willow Drive between T.H. 12 and Co. Rd. 6, The construction of an urban section over the entire length would allow for significantly less right-of-way acquisition. The construction of the rural section on Willow Drive requires that the roadway centerline be moved 10 feet west through the center area of the project. This would be to minimize tree removal in front of the homes on the east side. The additional right-of-way along the west side necessary to construct the road was estimated to be 15 feet with the rural section. If the pathway were tc be constructed, the .^dditionai right-of-way would increase to 25 feet. The construction of an urban section would allow the roadway to follow the existing centerline with no significant tree removal along the east side. The pathway could be constructed along the west side with no additional right-of-way if a separation of six feet was provided between the pathway and curb. We would recommend that five feet of right-of-way be obtained to allow for a separation of 10 feet We would recommend that Willow Drive be constructed with an urban section to accommodate the pathway without significant right-of-way acquisition. We will continue to pursue the temporary signal construction with Mn/DOT if desired by the City. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GROli Page 2 l39A.cor fT oca rtC r T T TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 3, 1993 Annual Appointments to the Cable Commission The City Council appoints two representatives to the Cable Commission. One is a Councilmember and one is a City resident. Mary Butler had been the Council representative. Tim Pattrdn has been the citizen representative. The Council may at this time reappoint Tim Pattrin as the citizen representative and select a Council representative. L TO:Ron Moorse, City Administrator % / r FROM:Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk % DATE:February 1, 1993 SUBJECT; Tax Forfeited Land <9 . %0 % Attachments:A. Department of Property Tax and Public Records Letter Dated December 18, 1992 B. Map Identifying Properties C. Proposed Resolution - Tax Forfeited Land Released For Private Sale to Adjacent Owners The tax forfeited lands have been reviewed by staff. It is staff's recommendation these properties should be released for sale to adjacent property owners only. There are no current or pending assessments on these properties. Attachment C is a proposed resolution for Council adoption. HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AND PUBLIC RECORDS A607 Governnnent Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0067 I i MlIt! •• • • • Crossroads To Service December 18, 1992 DEC 2 '1 'iC-92 Dorothy M. Hallln, Clerk City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Ms. Hallin: Enclosed is a classification list on non-conservation land located in your municipality. The described parcels forfeited to the state of Minnesota for non-payment of property taxes. The lands included on the enclosed list were approved on Non-Conservation Classification List 788. under Resolution No. 92-12-0984, adopted December 8, 1992, by the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners, a copy of which is enclosed herein. As provided in Minnesota Statutes 282 we request that you either approve the parcel(s) for public auction, auction to adjacent owners if Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subdivision 7A is applicable, or request a conveyance to your municipality for public use. Our department requests that your governmental subdivision target February 26, 1993, for returning resolutions approving parcels for public auction In order that those parcels may be included in a possible Spring 1993 public auction. Please be advised that if the city council lails to rispond within ninety (90) days of the date of this letter, the sale will be deemed to be approved pursuant to M.S. 282.01, Subd. 1. We request that your city council or governing body adopt language In its resolution recommending disposition of the aforementioned tax forfeited land parcels whereby the non-conservation classification status pursuant to M.S. 282.01 of the lands is affirmed. In addition, we request that your resolution certifies that none of the parcels recommended for public auction or non-public adjacent owner auction need be withheld fro n sale pursuant to HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity emptoyer 1 Dorothy M. Hallin, Clerk December 18, 1992 page 2 Minnesota Statutes 85.012 (lands located within the boundaries of a state park), 92.461 (land containing substantial deposits of peat), 282.01, Subd. 8 (deposits of minerals), 282.018, Subd. 1 (waterfront land on meandered lakes, public waters and watercourses), or 282.018, Subd. 2(non-forested marginal land or wetlands). The DNR must then approve parcels before they can be processed for sale or conveyance. We require a certified copy of the City Council Resolution authorizing any action taken. If you request that a parcel be conveyed to your municipality, we also require that the form "Application by a Governmental Subdivision For Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Land" be completed and mailed to this office. Only new special assessments which were levied after the forfeiture need be certified to this department. The remaining bahnce of any assessment levied previously will be picked up automatically. We request the assistance of your governmental subdivision In making a determination as to the existence of any wells on the tax forfeited land listed on the aforementioned list. If any of the parcels on the list have wells, please request a Well Disclosure Certificate from our office. In addition, please provide any pertinent Information that may be available about the parcels on the non-conservation classification list, such as zoning, soil conditions, or municipal restrictions. If you have any questions, you may contact Terry Schuhler, Gordy Ramm or Jeff Strand, of the Tax Forfeited Land Unit, at 348-3734. Sincerely, Patrick H. O'Connor, Director Prope*'ty Tax and Public Records 'I rjti t-i Y M. J. Berry Tax Processing Section Supervisor PHO:MJB:s ’ / Enclosure m tHflf raiHiiHiranirai Mill •Kf mim h.lirtHt imif# EOli riiriiriit UMUi hlililMiy#:! •■■II i miN oms ll/05/fZsc IMP R6 «Q srx/PMOPCimr ADDRESSProperty Type BLK DOS DOSOS-lir-25 IS 002A S8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED Land C5-117»2S IS 0025 00<» 003 se ADDRESS UNASSIGNED Land 009 006’D5-1I7-2S lA 00A7 • 33S2 DAVSIDE RO I Land '08-117-2S S2 0015 OCKi 010 ResideSnal T’ake Shore soft Waterfront lake Minnetonka*' 10-117-25 22 OOU 58 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEOLand TOTAL MJH8ER Or ACCOLRffS BY HUNIC I / • NON-CONSERVATION CLASSIFICATION LIST 788-NCHCKWEPIN county property information SYSTEMLIST or FORFEITED PROPERTY REPORT NO: PIA21101page 21PREVIOUS 0M4ER/0ESCR1PT10NORONO E B TALBERT ETAL "BAYSIOE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA" E B TALBERT ETAL "BAYSIOE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA" INFO RESEARCH ASSOC INC "BAYSIOE ADDITION TO LAKE MINNETONKA" STATE LAND OEPT "SAGA HILL REVISED, HENNEPIN CO, MINN" H R JOHNSTON JR ET AL JOHNSTONS FRENCH LAKE SECOND ADDITION OL'TLOT 0 DATE OF JUDGEMENT DATE OF bldgforfeiture value HCTVALUE 06/17/89 06/06/92 3,100 06/17/89 06/06/92 3,100 06/17/89 08/15/92 SOO 05/19/80 10/29/92 29,900 06/17/89 06/06/92 100 ik , i GOVT LOT 7 2655. 42 R£S -■t ty^T V 49i. N •»• 1 PiJil or lOT IT iiM •“ ••: •• i i V ai I • •* • •*• c (5 (16) ri3) lOT V .r \ •Hi. w n» li •QQ CE-in-23 13 00ZM 05-in-Z3 1500^5 ► ...(13) (16)/ / *# O-f '"**.5 ‘•ni.i “trnr >.V5i» ^ ^ ' 'F^211 A S _i« •. 3• I«1 « ** in:i i '■ 1 t2n to: II Cit) < bx II » s ^ (12)pa nvi (in «./9 n»l - )+ftt- ^9C.V (t»rc*g VrJW \ A.V(43) •f. • ^ ir M22 !3 5 V- '- C^(46) ................. 05-111-25 N Qom sTTT^^ (HI ' H VVI5 a. L'Vir,. iv<r[> inicufif ‘>^17115 X f ^ Jr i«t 2 (3) (SD>•< .• I ; ■ j TAX FORFEITED LAND RELEASED FOR PRIVATE SALE TO ADJACENT OWNERS WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation orqanized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282, the City has received from Hennepin County a l:ist of lands within the City which have become the property of the Stauc of Minnesota for non-payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lands for compliance with local zoning ordinances, for the amount of outstanding special assessments remaining unpaid to the City, and/or for possible public use by the City as authorized by the Statutes. In addition the Council has reviewed said lands and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 85.021, 92.461, 282.01, Subd. 8, 282.018, Subd 1, or 282.018, Subd 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BTl IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono, pursuaic to Minnesota Statutes 282, hereby approves the classificati,n of each of the following parcels of land as non-conservation land, and furthermore, approves the public sale of each parcel of land as listed below to adjacent property owners. All parcels remain subject to all applicable zoning ordinance provisions, inclu'ing those regulations providing for minimum lot area and minimum lot width. Substandard parcels may be useable only in combination with other adjoining parcel(s). Release of these lands by the City Council is subject to the condition thac ail outstanding special assessments shall be paid in lull to the City upon return to private ownership. Any amount not recovered at the time of sale shall be subject to reassessriert by the City. District 38 38 PARCELS RELEASED FOR SALE P. I .D 05-117-23-13-0024 05-117-23-13-0025 Ud-117-23-14-0047 08-117-23-32-0015 10-117-23-22-0016 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held the 8th day of February, 1993. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE; Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 2, 1993 SUBJECT; City Facilities Change Orders /. Attached are three change orders related to the city facilities: 1. Swanson and Youndale - This is a net deduct of $99.00. This net deduct is a ccmbinetion of three very small changes including one add of C-iO.OO, one add of $135.00 and a deduct of $274.00. 2. Ackley Dornbach, Inc. - This is a total add of $1,452.00. The major portion of this add, $1,177.00 is related to the bid for security doors. The original low bid contract amount included only the security doors, it did not include the glass for the windows in the doors. When this was discovered, the Construction Manager worked with the sub-contractor to select an alternate vendor to provide the doors and the glass all in one package. The package with the glass cost $6,909.00 versus $4,943.00 without the glass, for an additional cost of $2,046.00. The $2,046.00 add for the doors with glass was partially offset by a $929.00 deduct related to changing form security doors to hollow metal doors in one area of the police department. 3. Gepharc Electric - This is a net deduct of $3,708.00. Please see the attached memo from John Davies detailing the various items involved in the change order. These change order amounts are all included in the budgec update information provided to the Council at the January 11 meeting. Council Action Requested: Motion to approve the change orders as presented above. KKAU5-ANDFKS0N CONSTRUCTION COMPANY coMTKAcroks .V ( I ).n:si i<i i(‘.hc.»\ \n\.\f..H<s February 2,1993 Mr. Ron Moorsc City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Cr>stal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Orono City Hall and Public Works Buildings K/A PTojcci#4059 Dear Ron: The following is a brief summary' of the revisions noted in the three change orders you are presenting to the council. Swanson ajid Youngdalc This change order includes three items. Proposal Request No. 7 changed the plastic laminate counter top in room Cl01 to wooti. The cost to finish is S135.00. Field Order No. 8 added the painting of gyp board column covers in vestibules AlOO and BlOO at an add of S40.00. Pioposal Request No. 23 revi.scd the council and administration ceilings for a deduct of S274.00. .|\cklev-Dornbach Doors Cl 18 and C12I were deleted from their contract for a cost of (S929.00). These door* were already included in the LaForcc contract. We switched from Trussbuilt B.R. doors and frames to Chicago bullet proof doors and frames for an added cost of S2.046.00. This al.so included the B.R. glass not included in ihc Tiussbuilt package. Gephart Electric 1. Proposal Request No. 10 - Revised. Tlic add for this work includes revisions to outlet location in ilir police building and clarifications to the carbon monoxide system. 2. Proposal Request No. 6 inc'ludes revisions to the secured area of the police building including revisions t.o electric strikes, etc. 8. Alternate No. 4 is the wiring of the cold storage building. At this lime the cost represents stubbing out ot a conduit for lutuic connection. 4. Proposal Request No. 9 - Revised is for the cost to locale the generator further from the police building. 5. Proposal Request No. 16 includes revisions to receptacles in the police building aitd city council area. 525 Hfh Street, Minn^apuli*. 3 ***< 4 Phiw (hi21 fi2-72Hl KX ibliJ Ron Moorsc *■February 2, H>93 6. Proposal Request No. 20 includes the deletion of the security cameras and equipment. 7. Proposal Request No. 20 included the changing of the key pad at the police garage to a flush mount. Please call me if you have any quesdons. Very truly yours, KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Jtmn Davies Project Manager JD/lp CHANGE ORDER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EDITION AIA DOCUMENT C701/CM PROJECT:Orono City Hall and (name, address) Public Worlds Buildings TO (Contractor): Aclcley-Dornbach, Inc. P.O. Box 13036 Wauwatosa, WI 53213 Distribution to: OWNER □ ARCHITECT □ CONSTRUCTION MANAGER □ CONTRACTOR □ FIELD □ OTHER □ CHANCE ORDER NUMBER: ^ ^ ^ INITIATION DATE: January 6, 1993 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:1124.04 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: *^059 Detention Hollow Metal, CONTRACT POR:Haj-(^v\rare and Equipment CONTRACT DATE: August 31, 1992 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract; 1. Add to contract for cost of performance and payment bonds not included in original bid price. 2, Add to contract for revisions to bullet resistent frames and security doors as noted in AcJcley-Dornbach letter dated October 9, 1992. Add;335.00 Add: $1,117.00 Total Add: $1,452.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including anv adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract Time The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) was ..................................................... $ Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ...................................................................... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was ................ S The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by this Change Order ..................................................................................................................... $ The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order will be ... $ The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefo^is 31.000. 00 -0- • 31.000. 00' 1,452.00 32,452.00 ‘ December 31^, 199^^*'^*’ Recommended; CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Minne^olis. MN 55404 AOD«SS _ " C'DATE Agreed To: A(')clcy-Dornbach. Inc. CONTRACTOR Wauwatosa. WI 53213 ADDRESS ^ •/' ytj j*^/'.y/j.*. Approved; Boarma n ARCHITECT Min os Pfister and Associates MN 55401 authorized: City of Orono OWNER Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ADDRESS 4^ DATE DATE CAUTION You Should sign an original AIA document which has this caution printed in red An original assures that changes will noi be obscured may occur when documents are rtproduced. AtA DOCt'MINi C791 CM • CHASCI ORDER • CONSTRUCTION MANAClMfST tOiTlON • »LNf fL' TiQN • a :a # ® 11t0 • the AVURiCAS INSTITCTI Of A«<.HlTfC^S IMS SEW >(.'RX AVfNUC SW AASHiNC^Os DC :xn>» WARNIM UfMtc #n»#e photoc oRyMg vfoiMt U S coRynghi 'mm ane tt Rufc|>ct to Mgat piiMi€y1to#i C701/CM —1980 \)VCHANGE ORDER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EDITION AiA DOCUMENT C701/CM Distribution to: OWNER □ ARCHITECT □ CONSTRUCTION MANAGER □ CONTRACTOR □ FIELD □ OTHER □ PROJECT: Orono City Hall and (name,address) Public Works Buildings TO (Contractor): Swanson and Youngdale P.O. Box 26070 Minneapolis, MN 55426 CHANCE ORDER NUMBER: INITIATION DATE: January 8, 1993 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 1124.04 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: CONTRACT FOR: CONTRACT DATE: 4059 Painting arid WalIcovering May 11, 1992 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Furnish additional labor and material required according to revisions to plans and specifications as noted in Proposal Request No. 7 - Revised, Proposal Request No. 8, and Proposal Request No. 23.Total Deduct: ($99.00) Not valid until s gned by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager Signature o( the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including anv adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract Time The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) was................................................. $ Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................................................ j The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was ............... $ The (Contract Sum; (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by this Change Order ............................................................................................................ $ The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order will be ... $ The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Recommended: 24,894.00. -0- . 24,894.00. (99.00) 24,795.00 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Minneapolis, MN 55404 ADDRESS\ f'fV ‘13BY \J DATE Agreed To: Swanson and Younqdale contractor .Mi nneai/ba i s , .MN 55426—/7^ BV J f / A A Tt ( ) Days. December 31, 1992 Approved Boc^rman roos Pfister and Arsociates ARCHirECT MitHTeap c/i 1 DYE J Authorized: City of Orono OWNER Crystal Bay , MN 55323 ADDRESS DATE CAUTION. You should sign an original AIA document which has this caution printed In red. An original assures that changes will not be obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. *«A OOCUMINT CrtITAS • CHXSCt • COSSTHtCTtON wAS.CfvtvT EO'TlCS « i'_S£ ’SSO tOlTIOs • XiAt t )s« • TMt AvrticAs issTiTcn o» a «chit {cts , vjs Ntw 'Otx ‘vtsti % a A*SM(>croN uc ima C701/CM — 19t9 |»M!ecofiyin9 vtolaiti Ui. copy^lgM and to iogol pwoocufion CHANGE ORDER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EDITION AIA DOCUMENT C701/CM Distribution to; OWNER □ ARCHITECT □ CONSTRUCTION MANAGER □ CONTRACTOR □ FIELD □ OTHER □ PROjECT: Orono City Hall and (name, address) Public V^/orks Buildings TO (Contractor): Gephart Electric Company 3600 LaBore Road St. Paul, MN 55110 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: Two ( 2 ) INITIATION DATE: January 6, 1993 ARCHITECT'S PROjECT NO: 1124.04 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 4059 CONTRACT FOR: Electrical CONTRACT DATE: May 11, 1992 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract; Deduct from contract amount for items 1-7 listed on attached sheet.Total Met Deduct: ($3,708.00) Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment m the Contract Sum or the Contract Time. 279.400.00 (9,267.00) 270.133.00 The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteeo Maximum Cost) was.................................................. $ Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ....#1.................................................... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was ............... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by this Change Order ............................................................................................................. S The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order will be ... $ The Cont'act Time will be (increased/ (decreased) (unchanged) by ( ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order th^fore is December 31, 1992 (3,708.00) 266,425.00 ’ Recommended: Kraus-Anderson Construction Compan y CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Mi nnaannl 1 «;. MN 55 4 04 ADDRtSV A; Approvei n Kroos Pfister and Associates MN 55401 i-m ^ > DATE Gnnharti ElGctiri/t: Cq CO nt H aj .-tor y // t / ^.------J DATE Authorized: CitV of Orono /ate OWNER Crystal Bay. MN 55323 ADDRISS DATE CAUTION: You should sign an original AIA document which has this caution printed in red. An original assures that changes will not be obscured as may occur whan documents are reproduced. AtA OOCUMINT CM e CHASGl OROEt • CON^IRLCTiUS MA'^AClMlsf IDinos • ILM '960 fDlTlUS • AIA* t • -Mt AMERICAN ISSTITLTI Of ARCHITKTS K15 NlA >0«A AVlSCl NW WASHINGTON (J C 2COJt C701/CM —1980 WARNINQ UrMtc*<iMO pKowcoeyiw9 vtolatM US coey ngN and >• «ubi»ct lo l*9ai pMMcution i • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Gcphart Rlcctric Company Chan^ye Order #2 - Attachment Add to contract for re\isions to electrical work as noted in Proposal Request No. 10 - Re\ised.Add: S 4,675.00 Add to contract for revisions to security equipment as noted in Proposal Request No. 6.Add: S 2,515.00 Add to contract f'’ ost of electrical stub-out for future cold storage, building. This amount includes cost of work to date related to Alternate #4 on Bid Documents.Add: S 1,326.00 Add to contract for rcsisions to electrical work as noted in Proposal Request No. 9 - Revised.Add: S 547.00 Add to contract for revisions to electrical work as noted in Proposal Request No. 16.Add: $ 1,470.00 Deduct in contract amount for deleting security cameras and equipment as noted in Proposal Request No. 20.Deduct: ($14,483.00) Add to contract for changing to a flush mount key pad at police garage as noted in Proposal Request No. 20.Add: S 242.00 Total Net Deduct: (S 3,708.00) J /7 TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:February 2, 1993 SUBJECT: Lake Use Committee Appointments Oversite A - Maxw Acf^bss As the DNR moves ahead with its proposal for a public access on Maxwell Bay, it is important the City closely monitor and provide input to the DNR regarding their proposal. This review should involve members of City staff, the Planning Commission and the City Council. Mayor Callahan has suggested the Lake Use Committee could perform this function for the City. L TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 2, 1993 Joint Defense of the Lawsuit Brought Against^^^2he Minnesota Police Recruitment System and its Member Cities The City of Orono is a member of the Minnesota Police Recruitment System and has been named as a defendant in two concurrent lawsuits alleging the Minnesota Police Recruitm.ent System's testing process is discriminatory. The Minnesota Police Recruitment System provides police officer candidate testing for 36 cities in Minnesota, most of which are in the Metro Area. The MPRS is not a private firm but rather is a joint powers entiry made up of the member cities. After much discussion regarding how best the MPRS and the member cities could defend themselves in these suits it was determined that it would be most cost effective to select one law firm to jointly represent the MPRS and the member cities. The law firm of iio:mes and Graven serves as general counsel for the MPRS. As such they are familiar with the MPRS testing process and have already done a significant amount of work related to the lawsuits. The MPRS Board, which is made up of representatives of each of the member cities, has voted to continue to have Holmes and Graven represent MPRS in the lawsuits. Holmes and Graven has indicaced they are willing to provide a joint defense for the member cities. They have also indicated that the major issues involved in the lawsuits are very similar for both the MPRS and tlie member cities; and that the cost of providing for a joint defense would not be significantly greater than the cost of d<=*fending the MPRS. The MPRS B »4rd has determined that the cost of defending J-he MPRS in the la^f.iu ts, which would include the joint defense of any member ci: choosing the joint defense alternative, would be allocated to the member cities as follows: 1. Initial payment of $500.00 from each city. 2. Any additional costs to be shared among all member cities on the basis of city population. It is staff's recommendation that the city join in the joint defense to be provided by Holmes and Graven. I have attached a letter from Hclmes and Graven discussing conflict of interest issues and other issues related to the joint defense; a joint defense agreement; and a resolution authorizing Holme.s and Graven to represent the City in tiiu lawsuits. [•»» I I MUl ■<2*. AIIOTMjt al l^w ROBUT A. ALKOB Ronald U. Batiy STtfHIN J. BtllX John b. dean Maitg . dobbins Stetanie N. Gaixy COBIUNE A. HEINE James S. Holmes David J. Kennedy John R. Iaeson Wellington H. Law CHAKLCI I-. IXFIVEIE Holmes & Graven ( IIAHTERFD l?9 Ptlbb'jry Mlnn#*pnJU Mlnn«^(« 554^)2 (612) JJ7.9J00 Fmlrmia (612) 3J7-9J10 WINTER S DIRECT D 337-9209“^JAN' 2 8 1993 John m. umir, jr Robcmt j. U ndall Lai *ea K. Molltt Babbaba U PoarwooD jAl^fES M. SnOMVfTN James J. Thomson , je. La EEV M. WEHTHnM Bonnie I. w ileins C a IY P. WlNTEl David Geavtn OFCX)l^5EL ROBEBT C. CABL50N ROBFBT L. Da \TD50N January 27, 1993 DISTRIBUTION LIST OPONO RE: John Starks v. Minnesota Police Recruitment System, et al. and Christopher Fields v. Minnesota Police Recruitment System, et al. The MPRS Board decided at its meeting yesterday to continue to have our law firm represent MPRS in the lawsuits. The purpose of this letter is to determine whether the individual cities would also like us to jointly represent them. The core of the joint defense would be that Ml'RS and the cities did not discriminate, and that in any case, defendants’ actions and omissions did not cause damages to plaintiffs. The Rules of Professional Responsibility allow an attorney to jointly represent multiple defendants in a civil action as long as the attorney is not materially limited by his or her responsibi ’ities to another defendant and as long as the attorney reasonably believes that his or her representation will not be adversely affected. Each client must consent to the joint representation after consultation with the attorney. The attorney for each of the cities in this case owes that city an obligation to defend the case vigorously on its behalf. There is always the potential that a conflict between the defendants could develop. Based on my review of the facts and backgrovtnd to this case, there is no actual conflict of interest at the present time that would prevent a single attorney from defending the case vigorously on behalf of each of the individual defendants. There may be issues that apply to some defendants and not to others. For example, there is an allegation regarding a civil service violation that applies to only 13 cities . In addition, some cities supplement the MPRS system in their recruitment and hiring proce .6. Another example is that some ''ities e MPRS less frequently than others . In defending each city on these issues, there may be facts that are more favoral le to some cities than to others. At the present time, these differences seem only to make some defenses more or less attractive to different defendants. I do not see those partially divergent facts creating an actual conflict of interest that would affect the core defenses. It is always possible, however, that a judge or jury could conclude that only some defendants are liable and not others because of different facts. There Is also the possibility that the plaintiffs would be willing to settle with only some defendants, or that some defendants would have different settlement incentives. JJTATI* iimo-1 »^ DISTRIBUTION LIST January 27, 1993 Page 2 Joint representation of all of the cities in this case has certain advantages . It allows the cities to present a united defense to the allegations and provides significant cost savings to the individual cities. Joint representation does, however, create some potential risks. The most significant risk would be that sometime later in the case an actual conflict could develop between some of the defendants. If the actual conflict adversely affected our relationship with another defendant, we would have no option except to withdraw from representation in the case. Potentially, this would include withdrawal from representing any of the defendants. In making your decision as to whether you want to have joint representation, you should also keep in mind the law regarding confidentiality among joint clients. When a single attorney represents joint defendants, there is no confidentiality among the clients themselves. In other words, whatever a particular client discloses to the attorney can be disclosed to the other clients. (There is, of course, confidentiality as to any third parties.) You should also be aware that our firm represents four of the cities (Brooklyn Center, Crystal, New Brighton and Robbinsdale) as general counsel. We also represent several of the other cities as special counsel in Litigation and bond matters. We are also appointed by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust to defend lawsuits on behalf of Trust cities. Therefore, if a dispute about coverage arose between any of the defendants and the Trust, it would not be appropriate for us to represent either side on that issue. Based on my review of the case, I believe that our firm's representation of each of you will not adversely affect our responsibility to the other cities. I am, therefore, enclosing a consent form for each city to sign agreeing to joint representation. Each of the cities should discuss this issue with its attorney or other independent counsel before signing the agreement. (lam also enclosing a draft resolution for your use. Please feel free to modify it as you see fit.) We do not believe that there will be any significant additional attorneys’ fees Incurred in representing the individual cities that would not otherwise be incurred as a result of defending MPRS. If this changes because of developments in ihe lawsuits, we would let the affected cities know immediately. We, therefore, propose to bill MPRS for our services, and the fees would be allocated to its members on whatever basis the MPRS Board determines is fair. If any of you have any questions concerning any issues pertaining to this matter, please feel free to contact me or Charlie LeFevere and we will be happy to discuss them with you. Sincerely, ( Jamc^s^ Thomson hWTijes Enclosure JJT47i7* HPllO-l JOINT DEFENSE AGREEMENT Recitals 1. The City of ("City") has been named as a defendant in two actions filed in the Fourth Judicial District, File Nos. 93-00218 and 00219, entitled John Starks v. Minnesota Police Recruitment System, et al. and Christopher Fields v. Minnesota Police Recruitment System, et al. ("Lawsuits”). The plaintiffs in the Lawsuits allege that the defendants have cdlegedly engaged in activities that result in a rc-cial discriminatory impact on the plaintiffs. The complaints name as defendants 36 cities and the Minnesota Police Recruitment System. 2. The City has been advised by the firm of Holmes & Graven Ir a letter dated January 27, 1993 of the ramifications, including the advantages and risks, involved in having a single law firm jointly represent all of the defendants in the Lawsuits. The City has also been advised by Holmes & Graven that it should consult with independent counsel as to whether it should agree to be jointly represented by one attorney in the case. 3. The City believes that it is in its best interests to retain Holmes St Graven to defend the City in the case and to have Holmes & Graven jointly represent the other defendants^ in ttoe Lawsuits. Agreement Based on the above recitals, the City agrees as follows: 1. The City retains the firm of Holmes & Graven to represent it in the Lawsuits and consents to having Holmes & Graven represent the other defendants in the Lawsuits. The City understands that Holmes & Gi'»ven wiU bill MPRS and that the allocation of defense costs will be decided by the MPRS Board. JJT477M muo-i 2. The City understands that by entering into this agreement that confidential communications between itself and Holmes & Graven may be discussed by Holmes & Graven with the other defendants. 3. By entering into this Agreement, the City does not waive any attorney/client, work product privilege, right of immunity, which the City or its attorney may be entitled to invoke. The City specifically is not waiving these rights as to any third party that is not a defendant in the Lawsuits. 4. The City may revoke this Agreement at any time by providing written notice to Holmes & Graven. Date:CITY OF By Its JJT477S0 MTllO-l FROM: DATE: n TO: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 2, 1993 SUBJECT: Voice and Data Cabling Contract Payment #2 C/Jy 6 We The voice and data cabling project for the new city facilities has now been completed, inspected and approved. The only item remaining to be completed ■> s the provision of a wiring diagram of the installation. The total contract amount is $16,468.00. One half of this amount has been paid. The remaining is $8,234.00. It is recommended a payment in the amount of $6,587.00 be made at this time leaving a 10% retainage to be paid when the wiring diagram is provided. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 4, 1993 'jd /'y:., 6 Resolution Designating the New City Facilities as Smoke Free Facilities 'i\lG The attached resolution designates all of the new city buildings as smoke free facilities. The only exception to this is that a person detained by the Police Department for interrogation may be allowed to smoke in the interrogation room. This procedure often increases the effectiveness of the interrogation process. City staff were advised that the new facilities would be smoke free. It is recommended the Council adopt the resolution at this time so that there is a uniform policy in place for all buildings. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCR. NO._______ A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NE\\ CITY FACILITIES TO BE SMOKE FREE BUILDINGS WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal organizatior. existing under the laws of Minnesota, and WHEREAS, the City of Orono wishes to provide City officials, employees, and the general public with a work and meeting environment that is smoke free. WHEREAS, the City of Orono has constructed the following new buildings: Orono Public Works, 2700 Kelley Parkway Police Department, 2730 Kelley Parkway Village Hall, 2750 Kelley Parkway Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Orono City Council has designated all of the above named buildings to be smoke free buildings with the exception of a designated area in the police department for the sole use of individuals while being detained for a criminal investigation. Adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting on February 8, 1993. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mavor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mayor and City CouncilRon Moorss, City AdministratorFebruary 2, 1993Office Furniture Payment No. 1 Police Department has beer instaiiea. retainage. aTO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public V/orks Director February 3, 1993 Pay Request #2/Final Pump and Meter Service % Attached for review and approval is pay request S2/Final from Pump and Meter Service for the installation of the hoists at the new Public Works facility. The work has been completed according to specifications and I recommend payment for the requested amount of $5,545.53. LET¥E[S ®E TISAli^SKilOTT^ ARCHmCTliRI INTIWOt OLSiCN tNCNU^JNC CATC 2fb. fc^3 NO 1 11 7^f. ^ J 22 J No'* 2"d S»«»» • Minrooeoiu mn )34ui fo« 339^212 • 612 339 32S2 jam 2 8 1993 ATTCINTiON 1 HPY a _, «c 'z7sq ferveo-v WiAjuj^ Grfc»N2> r<\Ut^\(^C^LLu' Ock^ (d^ rAr i^^VtiTWTT^cvi1 <5iF.cAiO, yVM^ • ffTi I >—> 1 ^ 1 • *w T' '—W— 1--------------------- ■;■ C.-TYCr . 1 CRCSO J ! ItoZ*. Mt.LST3 1 A ftU2^S>. ifuSeSQ''::/!! ARE SENDING YOU Attached □ Under separate cover via □ Shop drawings □ Prints fw=tt ________the following items: □ Plans , □ Samples □ Specifications □ Copy of letter □ Change order y rnPiKS DATE NO.OeSCBlPTION w W r * 1 ij^ =1?.#2,mt'OA /2R^ '17iic f.oJ. 1 'aS]y^U2^i^ir. _________ ! THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: □ For approval n For your use □ /s requested Q For review and comment C FOR BIDS DUE----------- □ Approved as submitted ^5^ Approved as noted n Returned for corrections □ ------------------- □ Resubmit. □ Submit_ □ Return__ .copies for approval .copies for distribution corrected prints C PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS onrl — i fiATW £c>(>4 fextt. TVPr Ascwr ** -mg rrttw^r Aixunr -S 30. 5I5.:^-----IIQ om ai Did ------ OlVi ^ r\-Kc::r'^c:ytanc^ m — UAMW ...----r-------‘-'T— _ . _ ^ Jri^/wwr r^6* Ji TO* ™v ^-^FCPffftOfeYl ^ (PufYV? r ^ ^ ^ ^ SIGNED:----------------------^y\Qw-( - .<•• •• "•«•« »"»**» “• •* •"•• 6r 638S4 r 702975 .1 ^ 1 •* fc...:J-';3 s y/ P4*^9%4% jPEl^ -r^j^ljggSa&agy^SOLO TO City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, ^t^55323 J MAIN OFFICE; M3C3 ixClLiiC" iUVO HCftUNS ««««SUAJ (•131 9U-AM0 BEJIN PUMP SERVICE A OlV OF FUM# • MfT|« SIPVICI. INC. CMiFFf<«A falls. 'FM 1472f r n SHIP TO |>-'ano Maintananc* Huy 12 Orono, HN WORK ORDER OR PACKING SLIP •DATE ;^lNVOICENO. - • ’ ‘.'T'* r“i tis 2 95391 c 1/04/93 68894 1 TERMS: L J N»t 30 Oai^ SHiroi ALeSMAN-W*;-.^•'rCUSTOMER P.O/NO. '•. ORDER DATE -."■.-'SHIP DATE •-VIA:BACK ORDER FROM: 16207 -V ^ • 1 . 1 ic*r DO ms: ; . .* B/OHO?l----------------- ■ CoMfil'ta insiallation __Eilli-Mith-oil of <13 Rotary DT02W & RtlUliifljit hoists systM-m-sarvic*. Projact Coaplata Lass..par tial- billing NON TAX MOSE Final Bi lling 6^S95 TAXABLE MDSE SALES tax FREIGHT #30,513 cAaerBOP 00 DEPARTMENT Constrxrrtic AMOUNT MILEAGE CHG ^HlNVQlCE • TOTAU- Vi, '’"a. &rS^- ..'.0 chr.rga of i% montil f annLm) vvii! be apoiiec to ;culc baioTice after 30 days. «• % w tr Please Pay By Invoice — ORIGINAL INVOICE Thank You • - T • ^ » ■/Pm*.-i ‘APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ma document G702 (ii.situnions on rcvi-isc sku*) iv«.ioni()(flO (OWNfR);City ot Orono P.O. Box 66 Cr^'stGl Bay, MN 55323 IROM (CONlRA.ilOK): ^ Meter Seryice, Inc. I ’ROirci;Otono MntnclpaJ. Facilities Orono, MN Al’I'l lCAIION NO: 2 «>lR!f)|) K): il303 Excelsior Blvd. Hopkins, MN 55343 VIA (AR(,IIIIICI):Boanran & Assoc. 222 No. 2nd St. Mpls, MN 55401 CONI RAC r FOR:F^r»r*- 144*Sn VoMcIp I.irtn ARCHIILCrS PROIECrNO: H24.07 6-12-92 CONTRACT DATE; p.p, 16207 Uisuibuliun to;□ OWNERn ARCniltCI IICONIKACIOR□□ CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made (or Paymrnt, as sliown below, in cconnection with the Contract Con'dnuatinn Shed, AIA Document 0701, is attacliec). CHANGl ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous monllis by Own«*r TOTAL ADDITIONS Approved this Month Number Dale Approved TOIALS DtDUCnONS L Net chan ge by CbaoKC Orders 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.........................................% _3U^1.JQ0. 2. Net change by Change 0» Icrs ... ... $ . 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DAIE (line 1 ±2)........................$ —mill.'?!. 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE....................S _.) (Column G on G701) 5. RETA'NACE: a.___% of Completed Work $__________________ (Column D f E on G70J) b.___% of Stored Material (Column F on G703) Total Relainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I o( C70J).....................................$-------r_0_r. 5*' Ihc undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contrar tor's knowledj;e, information and belief the Work covered by this Applu alnm for I'ayment ha^ been completed in accordance with the Contract Dorurnents, that all amounts b.ive f)er*n paid by the Contractor ior Work for which |>revious C rutificates for Payment were issued and payments receiver! from the Owner, and that current payment shown lierein is now due. 6. TOTAL EARNED lESS RHAINAGE.................................$ _r 321il:'51r: ^ (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) w *C2 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES TOR PAYMENT (Line (> Irom prior Cer(ilicate)...............$ 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..............................................S —^ 9. OALANCE TO FINISM, PIUS RFIAINACE......................^ - Q (Line 3 less Line 6) ________ __________________ CONIRACIOR State t)(; Date /-y-^3 ARCHITECl'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In arcorrlante witfi the Contract Doujments, hasrd on n»'. observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner tha^ lo tlie best of the Arclutect ’s knowledge, infcumation and belief the Work piogre^sed as indicated, the (juality of the Work is in ac (ordaiu e with lire Conlrar I l)ucun.e ils, and the < ontraclur is enlillcd lo payment of the AMOl NT CtRIIFIED. AMOUNT ClRIiriEU.................... (Arf.ich explanation if amount ccr ARUtltlCF; ANOKA COUNTY My CuMu lMlon E«pH« S«pt 23,1638 mt applied lor.) Ily; lY-fTot negotiable. T D.,.: lids Cerlificatc negotiable. The AMOUNT CTRTiriED is payable only to Cot tractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payrnenl are will prejudice to any rigfrts of ihr Owner or Contractor under this C.onlr«Kt. AU DOCUMiHT C7H * AITUCAIION AND ( IRIinrjMi fOt r^VMlNI • MAT rwi fimirjN • AIA* • © 1*WI lie AAMRH AN INSIHUIl CK AirillUCIS, DIS NIW ItMU. AViNia, N VV. WAMlINCnirN. DC 2QD» TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 3, 1993 SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Fees 6o • •• J J O 1 Attachment:Proposed Letter to Stubbs Bay Area Residents Concerning Connection to the Completed Sewer System It is the normal policy cf the City that when a sewer project is complete all properties in the project must connect within li months (two construction seasons). If they do not connect within 16 months they pay a sewer availability charge that is equivalent to tne quarterly sewer fee. As part of resolving the Stubbs Bay assessment issue, the Council '•greed that those properties with conforming septic systems could take up to 5 years to connect to the sewer system. The Council also determined th^t those with the 5 year connection period, who d^ not connect w..thin the 16 month period, will pay an "unconnected property charge" that is equivalent to the portion of the sewer fee related to the maintenance of the sewer system. This fee is set at $24.30 per quarter for 1993 versus the $51..5 quarterly sewer fee. The difference in the two fees is the amount charged by the MWCC. The attached letter provides a set of guidelines for ' t^nr ,*cting to the sewer system and indicates the fees to be charged to those whose time line for connection is beyond the 16 mont' >. The letter indicates those who have up to 5 years to connect will continue to pay the annual septic fee until they connect. They will also begin paying che unconnected property charge at the end of the initial 16 month connection period. Council Acuion Requested: Motion to authorize the attached letter to be sent to the Stubbs Bay area property owners. o o r\*vV '•'■^ A'\'^. r,.v% C; CITY of ORONO x\ \ Miintctpii] Offices Post OITUe Rm 66 (.'nstai Ba\, Minnesnta 55323 Februar)' 4, 1993 Dear Stubbs Bay Resident: The sanitary sewer system in youf neighborhood is complete and you may connect your residences any time. The following are basic guidelines that you should consider when you plan to hook up: 1. 2. 3. 4. You must pay a Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) to the City before a connection permit can be issued to your contractor. The SAC is $750.00 for connections made in 1993. This fee is forw-arded directly by the City to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) who sets the fee. The fee is normally increased by MWCC each year, so connections occurring in future years will likely pay a higher SAC. You must hire a plumber to make the actual coiuiection between your house and the sewer service stub brought to your property line. A list of licensed plumbers is available at the City office. Be advised that we are in the new City offices at 2750 Kelley Parkway across from the Orono Mi Idle School. Your plumber must obuiin a sewer connection permit from the City prior to making the connection. The cost of that permit is $35.50. The Cir’ Code requires that at the time you connect to the City sewer, all existing septic tanks no longer in use shall be pumped out and filled with native soil. You should be . ore that this is included m the plumber’s bid. All sanitary plumbing serving your house must be connected to the sanitary sewer. If you intend to maintain an existing septic system for use merely as a receiver for footing or foundation tile orainage. this will require pnor review aiKl approval by the City Inspector. It is illegal to discharge footing and foundation drains, such as sump pumps, into the sanitary sewer system. Such drains cannot be connected to the sanitary sewer system, but must be routed to the ground surface or a separate drainfield system. TEi.mUJNT - 4?J.73S7 • fAX - 4TWKI0 Stubbs Bay Februar>' 4. 1993 Page 2 7. 8. 9. 10. The pipe from your residence to the service stub should be at a depth of at least 4-6' for the majority of its length to avoid freezing problems. Any connection piping at a depth less than 42" or underneath driveways or parking areas that will be cleared of snow during the winter, shall be provided with suitable insulation. The State Health Department requires a minimum separation of 20 ’ betwr . wells and air tested sewer lines, 50 ’ between wells and non-air tested lines. If your connection must be between 20 ’ and 50 ’ from your well or a neighbor’s well, your contractor will be required to air test your connection. Upon connection, the quarterly sewer scr\’ice charge will be $51.15 (1993 rate). Once sewer is available for connection, you are required to connect within 90 days, 16 months, or 5 years depending on your existing septic system confonnity. According to City polity, all propenies wil’ begin to pay the full sanitary sewer fee at the end of the designated connection period whether they have connected to the system or not. Those properties that have been allowed up to 5 years to connect will continue to be charg<*H the annual septic fee of $50.00 until they connect to the sewer system. In addition the agreement to provide for the 5 year connection period included the requirement that those properties with the 5 year connection period would begin to pay an "unconnected property charge" 16 months from the date of project completion. This fee, which is based on the cost of maintaining the sewer system, is currently set at $24.30/quarter. Please contact Steve Weekman, On-Site Systems Manager, regarding your connection deadline. If you have other questions or comments, piease feel free to contact me; Bruce Vang. Building Inspector; or Lyle Oman, Building Official. Sincerely, John R. Gerhardson Ihiblic Works Director JRG/lsv Enclosures • * ORDIMANCE ?105, 2nd Series AM ORDIKANCE TO OF STOBBS BAX SEHER SDOTIVISION * (B) (1)«.5??sfs;i.r«?sss »« (hereinafter "the City ) serve the Stubbs Bay municipal sewer trunk lines and laterals area; and HHEREAS, the Stubbs WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay early be complete and available for connec-.ron in late 1993; and WHEREAS, Municipal Code = °'„he« mu^ (B) (1) requires co°nnect such buildings to the City :::« vithi“irmonth/of the availabiUty of the sewer; and WHEREAS, in order to "ojVc\ burden on homeowners ex “*»nd t*he length of the required connection period . or properties m .he project ordain: ^ ronncil of Orono does herebyNOW THEREFORE, t^*e C-.y Council ,r es which fall into one or more of1. The owners of proper.-w shall connect the existing the following days of itsresidence to nunicipal sewe. w..nin :fu o / availability: Pace 1 of 3 Ordinance jrl05, 2nd Series 2. a . b. a. Properties with septic systems that are discharging to the surface. b. Properties using holding^ tanks as a primary or partial method of sewage dxsposal. The owners c£ properties which fail into the following lh^°r^^7n e \ f" rtn\\%" 3^" w^i=h listtnie^if n.::surefto the lotto, of the roch in the trench or bed. Properties that have drainfields "say 75' from the shoreline of Stubbs Bay or Stuobs Bay Creek. Prooerties that have drainfields located less than the State mininuu 30' separation from a wa.e. well. 3. The owners of all ^ or^?ab°ove%ha 11 ^c^o^nne^ °h«^exil-^ng°-elidtnce to the City sewer ®^he exis^-ng -esx ^ sewer becomes available, ICl^riiki^''uch‘'conn^^^ within 90 days of notice of such failure. • • sss' ;«v-.SA-.3-o;us; District is determined to be classi^iea n ?o%VISl^|in%: pe^f BSS i L\\“?illlirn^L5-7 n-n-o^^lol?:llg cl^llYfira^io^n. Page 2 of 3 c. Ordinance “105, 2nd Series Section 2. Effective date. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication. Adopted by the City Council o Minnesota this 27th day of July , 1992- e A.the City of Orono, ATTEST: /f "yii. Dorothy ^f^Hallin/ City Clerk ara A. Pete \ ann Goett srson. Mayor eni/Acting Mayor If during the 60 month connection period, the City initiates a program to determine the conformity . classification of all septic systems in the Shoreland • Overlay District, the Stubbs Bay sewer project area shall be exempt from such program to the extent that any systems classified as non-conforming solely as a result of such program shall not be subject to the normal one year non-conformity elimination deadline. I r«ctr«i v.i Mi^Rj«SnTS]Mil* I I*!::*#!#! [•7sr« RISRBiu Msr« Mtr*i Mtl«l [•1^1# [•7sT*l [•1ST* r*T*T«M;C*lsT*l liB;T»lsT«l [•1st* I ^lll^r*TiI*HriiKT*• Wl*liK*i [•ltT*1 [•T*T*I ^H^T*lsT*l [•JtT*] •^v : ,.^0 Continuation of five ton axle limit streets: Park Avenue Park Drive Park Lane Partenwood Road Pheasant Lawn Road Prospect Avenue Railroad Avenue Rest Point Circle Rest Point Lane Russell Avenue Scotch Pine Lane Shevlin Drive Smith Avenue Spates Avenue Spring Hill Road Spruce Place Starkey Road Stubbs Bay Road Tamarack Drive Togo Road Tonka Avenue Turnham Road Vine Place Watertown Road Wear Lane North Wear Circle Webb Street Webber Hills Road West Ferndale Road West Lafayette Road West Lake Street Wildhurst Trail Willow Drive (Dickey Lake Dr to Sixth Avenue) Willow Drive {Sixth Avenue to Medina City limits) Willow Drive (from South Brown Road to Fox Street) Willowbrook Road Windjammer Lane Woodhill Avenue The following are nine-ton axle limit; Old Crystal Bay Road McCulley Road Tonkaview Lane WiJlow Drive (from Watertown Road to Long Lake) Willow Drive (from Fox Street to Watertown Road) Willow Drive (from Highway 12 375' north to Otten Brothers driveway) The following bridge is limited to 18-ton per vehicle: 29 Tons per truck and full trailer or semi-trailer combination: Willow Drive The following bridges are limited to 19-tor. per vehicle; 32 Tons per truck and full trailer or semi-trailer combination: Old Crystal Bay Road West Ferndale Road Adoped by the City Council of the City oi Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held February 8# 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin# City Clerk Edward J. Callahanr Jr.» Mayor Page 2 of 2 FROM: DATE: TO: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Tom Kuehn, Finance Director February 3, 1993 SUBJECT: Salary Adjustment - Officer Irving English _ CJ< J As of February 11, 1993, Officer Irving English will have completed 8 years of service with the City of Orono. Under the 1922 LELS contract, currently in effect, he is eligible for a salary increase from $18,367 per hour to $18,724 per hour. It is recommended that Officer English's salary be increased to $18,724 per hour as of February 11, 1993. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by to increase Officer Irving English's salary from $18,367 per hour to $18,724 per hour as of February 11, 1993, as per the 1992 LELS contract currently in effect. Ayes , Nays <7* LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF FEBRURY 8, 1993 Annual Home Occupation License: Russell A. Norum 3264 Norch Shore Drive Cigarette License: John Downey Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Blvd John O'Sullivan O' Sullivans 2420 Shadywood Road Don Scherven Navarr#> Lanes 3435 Shoreline Drive % CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66, 1335 So BrouTi Rd Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Application Date: Date License Approved: Date License Expires: APPLICATION POR ANNUAL liOME OCCUPATION LICENSE Initial Review Fee - $50. Annual Review Fee - $30,C NAME: Russell A. Norum ADrRESSl J!i^64 N. "Shore Ur. PHONE: 47x-0568 CITY: Wayzata No. of Employees within operatinn: None_____ Provide list of names of ei*iployees on back of this application. Type of Business to be Operated: Attorney at: Law License may be revoked if any vicl.ation occurs. City staff shall have fi* (5) business days in which to investigate and make a recommendatic pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.02 & 5.03. If a site inspectic is required by City staff, the review time will be extended to ten (l! business days. The license application with staff recammendation %rill 1 scheduled before the Council at the next regularly scheduled meeting hel on the second and fourth Monday of each month. ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C) Prohibited Home Occupation Practices. 1. CITY OF T*. • 1 , X ^ OFFICEIt xs unlawful for any busxness operatxng as a honejjoj^^^^fitxon t engage in operation w’ithcut proper licenses. Vry 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. rur.'V i. i TJf u r.-| / ^\/ m V All persons engaged in the business must reside in che ynn COOl 001 TL No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in residential zone. No excessive stock in trade may be stored-on the premj.ses. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed. Entrance to structure. the home occupation must be gained from withxr. the r as 2r St ax «r sr *tr =r s « as s= = s=r rs rr t=rur 2S; The undersigned hereby agrees to '■..is conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code emd any addition?', conditions the City may require. Signature of Applicant:Date: POR CITT USE ONLY: After review if application, staff recommends tne following: ______ Approval of License ‘ Denial of License Signature of Zoning Official: o .-//-Date: Signature of Fire Inspector: rT ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date: 2.^ (-^7^ d 'JAN 2 0 1993 CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Cryst.il Ray. .Minr.cs-.u 55;i23 • Muniripal Office* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka AOMIMSTRATION -4"3-7J58 FAX-473-0510 £eb; APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 2 1S93 19 « 1. Name of Applicant Mailing Address _ WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA Er.VP City/State/Zip Code Phone Number _______ WAYZATA. MN 55391 rrrv nr nnn«n 612 47j 894 6 Fli^AHQE OFFICE t 7‘ 1 :-nAriM 1..V4/VVV fcV* 2. Sales Location: Name ___ 01 QEH CHECK TL 20. HECEIPT-THm YOU SAME V -EOVE ^-■:i7in r-AAi 001 T1I u\/ uw'i iik/A f -----------------—— n 7» /r Wfc/ V- Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number 3. Principal business carried on at this location PRIVATE CLUB 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter XX Other hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the bove location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the tdinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods; Fsb-Mar-Apr Hav-’une-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this ®ay be pro rated by quartets, at $5.00 per quar ter. (iake remittance payable to: Signature of applicant Dated CITY OF ORONO CITY of ORON Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323*Municipal Offices rrrv nr^nkinu-i f I u‘f k.*nc ‘itu.* F u‘f k.*ni.‘ifu.* X nnnt^u ui i ik/u On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ADMIMSTR^TION --173-735S FA X - 473-0510 1711 X UX Xtim\/\/\/V\f A1 rc'Ai V i i^l.J frucrv Ti C'f <4.WI« I i. 9A ^ V • vA iL. X/ « APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5,24 1. Name of Applicant _ _ _J c ^/u* 0 Sm-c., _ Mailing Address ajcui A/ K'crcTOT- ru^vni lll.kk.ll I I I ITiifM I l/U 19 7.>________iii/: city/state/zip Code A'\i^rLC &r\0Vtr S~ST3' ( Phone Number _______^i?^C - T 3 _____________________ 2. Sales Location; Name O u u c '' > Street Address P^2-J* bVCt'c'r^ Mailing Address '/■() 'DCK ^ ^________ A [T 3 3 ^ 2.^ Phone Number /- C~7 7_r 3. Principal business carried on at this location <^oc■ iv'c;j<-SV*;, 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter Other I heceby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the LoVe location subject to the laws o£ the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: >r V K < Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dic-Jan Make remittance payable to: Signature of applicant Dated LICENSE FFES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quartets, at $5.00 per quarter. CITY OF ORONO CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Munidpa] Off es On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka AD.NJIM5TR.AT10N - 473-7358 FAX-473-0310 Pan' '2 fe i993 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Ocono Municipal Code Section 5.24 *• • C.i I or CRONO ClEdO^S Name of Applicant /Z KW /Z' Mailing Address City/State/ZipCode M. (F ,<ty /) f J C Phone Number //7Z — Sales Location; Name /UA JiA a Street Address Mailing Address y< S ^ //AV/iKiPG. j Phone Number 1/7/ - ^ 7'// 3. Principal business carried on at this location Method of Sales; Over Counter Other —cm eF Fisms OFFICE isiiCMm------ 01 QEi 20. R 20.CHECK WUPT-Vm YOU S2641S0 cool ROl U 01/2 I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the city of Orono during the following quarterly periods; y / X / \ Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan \ LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 pet quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OP Signature of applicant Dated %"N ^/f5 ^ 01/3i/fl3 PH:CB PRREGOR 161 471688060 474563339 476921819 471840871 475443862 472503991 46952602647S989721 488821018 472529007 468701868 S07585424 469686562468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500656 475444249 477463877 471569863 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 480843542 477700023 334506281 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469^48107 475382983 473746173470566529 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663298 470704904 475505292 48I6294SS 500403192 477181539 ANDERSON, BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS SCOTT W BOSMA JAMIE L 6RINKHAUS. JOHN F CHISWICK. GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L OtMBOUSKl, JAY C ENGLISH III. IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICM. DAN T FPITZLER. JOHN M QAFFRON, MICHAEL P QERHARDSON, JOHN R GOMAN, DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALL IN. DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSINQ. CAROL J HASEMAN. CAROLE JOHNSON. BRADLEY P KARNITZ. RICKY 0 KENNEN. JANICE M KNUTSON CHARLOTTE 4 KUEHN, tHOMAS M MABUStH. JEANNE A MCNICMOLS, DAVID L MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKl. JAMES NELSON. DAVID D OOERAIQNER. SCOTT Q OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN, LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A OUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B SKREEN, DALE S STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X THOMTON. HARK R „» TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F 31 TOMCZYK, MARK W 31 VANG. BliuCE L 33 VEE. LINDA S 12 WALtCRS. LIWA 0 15 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J 33 DPT YTD CURRENT GROSS GROSS 31 5490.27 1640 88313019.51 1014.6431723.04 170.03121783 36 545.72424796 23 1611.68315042.88 1680.96314720.08 1579.48314108.80 1284.00314811.88 1675.90314756.64 1564.56315353.71 1607.03314940.90 1646.97334384.81 1473.43426235.70 2172.4235588.58 2 18 9242 12 4744.38 3777.24 1531.75 1269.28423896.08 1412.32311704 29 616.67122742.78 921.76314684.14 1555.0231311.82 191.2931691.82 209.90IS3019.50 1014.63156450.60 2167.60335491.18 1845.21313679.41 1286.61127279.79 2511.84314846 32 1526 4035399.54 105.81424018.34 1341.71924002.27 1422 47334384 81 1473 44423429 21 1222 07024591.22 1891.49923649 22 1286 40311029 02 255 05423758 64 1418 43933777 24 1269 28316127 98 2059.20 4407 4712 3777 2888 3472 3328 84 78 24 09 61 83 1469 1526 1269 963 1147 1117 28 40 28 92 38 92 80.657.71 402/28/93 PR: 162CM PRREGOR EMP I NAME 469188026 CALLAHAN. EDWARD 18324677 GOETTEN. J DIANN 470366089 HURR, JOELLEN L 473846272 JABBOUR, GABRIEL 476527186 KELLEY, CHARLES DPT YTD CURRENT GROSS GROSS 11 600.00 300.0011483.34 241.6711483.34 241.6711483.34 241.6711483.34 241.67 1,266.68 ■ ■ ■ ■ »« 4 % 4 « f))CeUNClL CHECK REGISTER MON. FEB i. 1993, 9:15 PM P»9* 1CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 27112 VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO NUMBER MANUAL 0840-4305 A23292 OH 0200-4305 A23262 OH 0427-4306 A23292 OH0249-4305 A23293 OH 0408-4306 23294M OH 0438-4305 A23295 OH 0438-4306 A23296 OH 0355-4305 A23297 OH 0359-4305 A23298 OH 0569-4531 A23299 OH 0129-4324 000321 OH 0549-4359 000321 OH 0129-4356 AR100278 OH 0099-4343 13237 OH 0080-4358 000979 OH 0080-4358 000317 OH 0069-4355 129206 OH 0039-435S 129206 OH 0129-4355 129206 OH 0174-4355 129206 OH 0549-4355 129206 OH 0569-4355 129206 OH 0089-4352 129206 OH 0129-4352 129206 OH 0174-4352 129206 OH 0549-4352 129206 OH 0569-4352 129206 OH0295-4210 129206 OH 0099-4343 129206 OH 0099-4324 000318 OH 0480-4520 8675FM OH 0099-4324 A 000319 OH 0438-4531 000323 ' ‘V OH <•> 27113 <•> 27114 <•> 27115 <•> 27116 <• > 27117 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/01 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993 '02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $466.50 S233.25 $175. ’8 $389 50 $5,382.50 $653.89 $497.55 $78 00 $728.50 $857 50 $9.462.37" $42.00 ;6,037.50 $6,079.50* $707.60 $707.60* $76.90 $76.90* $336 01 $336.01* $178.70 $176.70* BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF NEW HOPE CITYVIEW PLMBG 4 HTQ HENN CTY FIN DIV HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT 27118 1997/02/08 $624.52 LOQIS -SUITE 300 • 1993/02/08 $42.28 LOGIS .SUITE 300 .1993/02/08 $863.61 LOGIS -SUITE 3001F93/02/08 $422.15 LOQIS -SUITE 3001993/02/08 $44.05 LOGIS -SUITE 3001993/02/08 $117.53 LOGIS -SUITE 3001993/02/08 $854.39 LOQIS •SUITE 3001993/02/08 $495.29 LOQIS -SUITE 300 1993/02/08 $260.03 LOGIS •SUITE 3001993/02/08 $156.03 LOQIS -SUITE 3001993/02/08 $364.04 LOQIS •SUITE 3001993/02/08 $25.32 LOGIS •SUITE 300 1993/02/08 $117.59 LOGIS .SUITE 300 $4,386.83* 27119 1993/02/08 $4,482.89 MINNEGASCO <• >$4,482.89* 27120 1993/02/08 $293 00 NATIONAL AUTOMATIC <• >$293.00* 27121 1993/02/08 $2,501.42 NSP <•>$2,501.42*- 27122 1993/02/01 $94,767.25 PITT-DES> MOINES INC <• >$94,767.25* ENO-APPLICATIONS DEC ENQ COMP PLAN 3-DEC STORM WTR CONTOUR MAPS-DEMSA QEN-DEC FIELD INS/SURVEY-DEC ENG-RFP NO 4 ENG INSP DEC ENG OCB RD BRIDGE DEC ENG BIKE/HIKE TRAIL-DEC ENQ-LSI28 REPLACE-DEC WATER WATER SEMINAR REPAIR FAUCET DEC ROOM & BOARD DEC BOOKING FEES DATA PROC-DEC DATA PROC-DEC DATA PROC-DEC DATA PROC-DEC DATA PROC-DEC DATA PROC-DEC LOGIS APPLIC S;PP-DEC LOGIS APPLIC S‘.JPP-DEC LOGIS APPLIC SUPP-DEC LOGIS APPLIC SUPP-DEC LOGIS APPLIC SUPP-DEC LABELS CORRECT COMPUTER UTILITIES UTILITIES PYMT 14 WTR TWR •iff kJ J J o oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER MON. FEB 1. 19S»3, 9:15 PM ptge 21ECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL27123 <•> 1993/02/01 $1,214.50 $1,214.50* POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC LEQAL-APPLIC OCT/NC-V BAL 0840-4303 355675-1 OH 27124 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $3.71 $6.29 $10.00* PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 11-25 PAYPERIOO 11-25 PAYPERIOO 0069-4141 0129-4141 000320 000320 OH OH 27125 <•> 1993/02/08 $1,835.83 $1,835.83*WAYZATA-CITY OF 4TH OTR WTR 0549-4359 000322 OH 27128 <•> 1993/02/08 $19.55 $19.55* AT&T TELEPHONE 0175-4320 000354 OH 27130 <*> 1993/02/08 $116.21 $116.21* ALL STAR ELECTRIC REPAIR LIGHTS 0249-4233 000327 OH 27131 <•> 1993/02/08 $75 33 $75.33* ANDERSON-BRUCE CONFERENCE 0129-4356 000325 OH 27132 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $42 65 $26.16 $26.16 $26.16 $26.16 $26.16 $173.45* AT & T INFO SYSTEM AT & T INFO SYSTEM AT 4 T INFO SYSTEM AT 4 T INFO SYSTEM AT & T INFO SYSTEM AT 4 T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROC DATA PROC DATA PROC DATA PROC DATA PROC DATA PROC 0129-4340 0069-4340 0249-4340 0059-4340 0174-4340 0129-4340 000324 000324 000324 000324 000324 000324 OH OH OH OH OH OH 27133 <• > 1993/02/08 $1,206.96 $1,206.98* BARTON SAND/ORAVEL SAND 0249-4233 000328 OH 27l;i4 <• > 1993/02/08 $31.92 $31.92* BRINKHAUS-JACK CONF MILEAGE 0569-4381 000329 OH 27135 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $697.20 $1,341.24 82.038.44* CARGILL SALT OIV CARGILL SALT DIV SALT SALT 0249-4233 0249-4233 810968 810972 OH OH 27138 <•> 1993/02/08 $23.43 $23.43*CELLULARONE TELEPHONE 0249-4320 000332 OHI 27137 t*> 1893/02/08 $153.00 $153.00* CI7YVIEW PLHBG 4 HTG REPAIR FURNANCE 0590-4343 13712 OH 27131 <•> 1993/02/01 $298 31 $298.31* COLONIAL LIFE INS CO JAN INS 0129-4152 OOC331 OH 27131 1993/02/08 1993/02/01 1993/02/01 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $16 99 $32.05 $59.78 $8.99 $20.19 $1.85 $2.02 $2.63 COMMERCIAL LIFE/QRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/QRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/QRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COFWERCIAL LIFE/GRP FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS 0039-4152 0089-4152 0129-4152 0174-4152 0249-4152 9001-1298 0549-4152 0569-4152 00C330 000330 000330 000330 000330 000330 000330 000330 OH r OH OH OH OH OH OH OHI €1 o O 11 o nCOUNCILCHECK REi'.ISTER MON. FEB 1 1. 1993, 9:15 PH ’1 1CHECK NO CH'CK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR 1 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL27139<*>1993 '02/08 1993/02/08 $0.85$7.00$150.45*COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/QRP FEB INS FEB INS 0590-41520129-4152 000330000330 OHOH27140 <•> 1993/02/081993/02/08 $1,679.15$187.47 $1,865.62* CONCEPT MICROFIIM INC CONCEPT MICROFILM INC MICROFILMMICROFILM 0129-43060129-4306 61315976 OHOH 27141 <•> 1993/02/08 $144.00 $144.00* DOPADUS CORP MAINT SIRENS 0175-4342 930129 OH 27142 <*> 1993/02/08 $41.50 141.50* E.S.G. COMPANY INC PARTS 0249-4342 4634EM OH 27143 <•> 1993/02/08 $30.00 $30.00* FISCHENICH/DAN 1 • ) G & K SERVICES a * K SERVICES Q (& .K SERVICES , G & K SERVICES Q 4i K SERVICES « CANINE MEMBERSHIP 0129-4244 000333 OK 27144 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $45.51 $10.24 $15.17 $90.48 $273.22 $434.62* UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS RUGS UNIFORMS 0569-4221 0590-4221 0549-4221 0129-4343 0249-4221 000355 000355 000355 000355 000355 0 OHor: OH OH OH 27145 <•> 1993/02/08 $889.04 $889.04* GOPHEF OIL CO OIL.GREASE,LUBE 0249-4,’20 476976 OH 27146 <*> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $271.00 $1.295.36 $542.00 $145.68 $271.00 $2,525.04* GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC ' GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS 0115-4131 0129-41*1 0249-4151 0174-4151 0590-4151 600730 600730 600730 600730 600730 OH OH OH OH OH 27147 <* > 1993/02/08 $430.50 $430.50* HENN CTY FIN DIV TICKETS 0129-4322 93000068 OH 271^18 <•> 1993/02/Ot $28.15 $26.15* HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ASSMNT FEE 0039-4383 000335 OH 27149 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $268.96 $660.15 $929.11* HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER SUPPLIES POSTAGE 0059-4210 0059-4321 000334 000334 OH OH 27150 <•> 1993/02/08 $42.00 $42.00* J & R RADIATOR CORP REPAIR 0249-4342 156141 OH 27151 <•> 1993/02/08 $15.00 $15.00* JAMES GREGORY GREGORY Lie FEE 0549-4383 000356 OH 27152 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $56.96 $12.54 $69.50* KUEHN, THOMAS \ KUEHN, THOMAS 'JAN MILEAGE JAN MILEAGE 0069-4381 0569-4381 000357 C00357 OH OM P«9« 3 p;/ o oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER MON, FEB 1. 1993, 9:15 PM page 4CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDORLAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER DESCRIPTION CONFERENCE/VANQ/OMAN ACCOUNTNUMBER POINVOICE NO NUMBER MANUAL0174-4356 000337 OH 0129-4306 000338 OH 0249-4232 161417 OH 0249-4151 000341 OH 0129-4151 000341 OH 0069-4151 000341 OH 0174-4151 000341 OH 0129-4151 000340 OH 0249-4151 000340 OH 0069-4151 000340 OH 0174-4151 000340 OH 0039-4151 000340 OH 0115-4151 000340 OH 0549-4151 000340 OH 0569-4151 000340 OH 9001-1298 000340 OH 9673-1282 51480293 OH 0039-4210 440217 OH 0069-4210 440217 OW 0059-4210 440217 OH 0249-4210 440217 OH 0129-421C 440217 OH 0174-4210 440217 OH 9001-1261 440217 OH 0020-4210 443908 OH 0039-421C 443908 OH 0069-4210 443908 OH 00'>9-4210 443908 OH 0249-4210 443908 OH 0174-4210 443908 OH 0129-4210 443908 OH 0039-4210 444415 OH 0059-4210 444415 OH 0069-4210 444415 OH 0129-4210 444415 OH 0249-4210 444415 OH 0174-4210 444415 OH 0099-4324 000342 OHI 0129-4324 000342 OW 0569-4324 000342 OH 271S3 1993/02/08 <•> 27154 1993/02/08 <•> 27155 <•> 1993/02/08 27156 <•> 27157 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 27158 <•> 1993/02/08 27159 «•> 27160 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/")8 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/01 $120.00 $120.00* $336.00 $336.00* $44.88 $44.88* $417.91 $146.90 $146.90 $542.02 $1,253.73* $1,900.32 $813.00 $542.00 $458.16 $1,103 48 $271.00 $258.12 $387 $1,479 20 92 $7,213.20* $21,629.00 $21,629.00* $4,747.86 $90 72 $802.37 LONG LAKE FAMILY PRACTICE HEPATITIS SHOTS LONO LK FORD TRACTOR MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MEDICA MEOICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA MEDICA CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE rnoiCE CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE METRO WASTE $45.05 MIDWEST 6SNS PROD $31.33 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $25 81 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $25.81 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $45.10 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $56.29 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $33.33 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $36.07 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $11.85 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $11.85 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $11.85 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $11 85 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $11.85 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $11.84 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $4.31 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $4.31 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $4.31 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $4.31 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $4.31 MIDWEST BSNS PROD $4.31 MIDWEST BSNS PROD MINNEQASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEQASCO PARTS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB INS FEB FEE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COPY PAPER GAVEL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTITLITIES vj ACCOUNT NOnumber invoice no PONUMBER0174-4356 0003370129-6306 00033®0249-4232 1614170249-4151 000341 0129-4151 000341 0069-4151 000341 0174-4151 0003410129-0249-0069-0174-0039-0115-054905699001 415141514151-4151-4151-4151-4151-4151-1296 0003400003400003400003400003400003400003400003400003408673-1282 51480293)039-4210 3069-4210 3059-4210 3249-4210 0129-4210 0174-4210 9001-1261 0020-4210 0039-4210 0069-4210 0059-4210 0249-4210 0174-4210 0129-4210 0039-4210 0059-4210 0069-4210 0129-4210 0249-4210 0174-4210 440217440217 440217 440217 440217 440217 440217 443908 443908 443908 443908 443908 443908 443908 444415 444415 444415 444415 444415 444415 0099-4324 000342 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER MON. FEB 1, 1993, 9:15 PM pag« 5lECK NO CHECK DA1E CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR 11 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER POINVOICE NO NUMBER MANUAL27160<•>1993/02/08 $93.39$5,734.34*MINNEGASCO 1f UTILITIES 0549-4324 000342 Oh27161 <* >1993/02/08 $15.00$15.00*MINNESOTA GFOA !MEMBERSHIP 0069-4380 000343 OH27162<•>1993/02/08 $24.98$24.98*MN BENEFIT ASSN FEB INS 0129-4152 000339 OH27163<•>1993/02/08 $10.00$10.00*MN DEPT or AGRICULTUREf PESTICIDE APPLICATOR LIC•0590-4383 600790 OH27164 <• >1993/02/08 $54.49$54.49*NORTHERN •11 PARTS 0249-4232 138641TI OH27165<•>1993/02/081993/02/081993/02/081993/02/081993/02/081993/02/081993/02/081993/02/081993/02/01 $173.25$18.81$247.95$248.60$8.35$10.70$7.56$170.82S7.96$894.00*NSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSP UTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITY 0249-43240569-43240549-43240129-43240290-43240249-43240549-43240569-43240290-4324 000344000344000344000360000360000360000360000360000359 OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH27166<•>1933/02/08 $1,142.27$1,142.27*NSP ST LIGHTS 0249-4325 000345 OH27167<•>1993/02/08 $4,441.54$4,441.54*PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 1/4-1/17 9999-2031 000346 OH27168<*>1993/02/08 $13.22$13.22*RETTINGER UNION 76 SUPPLIES 0249-4220 03051 OH 27169 1963/02/08 $32.42 RFC PET & SUPPLY CO DOG FOOD 0129-4244 44526 OH <•> 1993/02/08 $79.11 $111.53* RFQ PET & SUPPLY CO DOG FOOD 0129-4244 44525 OH 27170 <^> 1993/02/08 $1,335.52 $1,335.52* RICHARD KOVACEVICH REIM FOR BAL OF SEWER CLA 05R9-4370 000336 OK 27171 1993/02/08 $8.92 RITZ CAMERA 1 FILM DEVELOP 0129-4210 3760272 OH 1993/02/08 $5.07 RITZ CAMERA 1 FILM DEVELOP 0129-4210 3760821 OH <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $135.62 $19.14 $168.75* RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA 1 1 •• • • FILM FILM DEVELOP 0129-4210 0129-4210 3761340 3761537 ' .. OH OH 27172 <• > 1993/02/08 $1,836.94 $1,836.94* ROLLINS OIL CO 1 • 1 1 GASOLINE 9001-1260 C00347 OH 27173 1993/02/08 $55.57 SCHWAAB INC 1 sup;LIES 0039-4210 L629122 . OH <•> 1993/02/08 $24.35 $79.92* SCHWAAB INC • t • STAMP 0039-4210 L636393 OH r * iCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER MON. FEB CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1. 1993. 9:15 PM paga 6CHECK DATE 1993/02/08 VENDORSTAR TRIBUNE DESCRIPTIONNEWSPAPER ACCOUNT PONUMBER INVOICE NO NUMBER MANUALOH27174<*>$17.55S17.55*D039-4240 000348 27175 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $205.52 *162.00 $367.52* STREICHERS STREICHERS SUPPLIES REPAIR 0129-4232 0129-4341 60356.1 60537.1 OH OH 27178 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $17.94 $33.58 $51.52* THE LAKER THE LAKER ADV AOV 0039-4323 0174-4323 000358 000358 OH OH 27177 <■> 1993/02/C8 $20.94 $20.94* TOWN A COUNTRY SUPPLIES 0099-4231 000349 OH 27178 <•> 1993/02/08 $205.80 $205.80* TRACY OIL CO FUEL OIL 0590-4324 17231 OH 27179 <•> 1993/02/08 $119.58 $119.58* TREADWAY GRAPHICS SUPPLIES 0129-4243 0014676-IN OH 27180 <*> 1993/02/08 $40.00 $40.00* U OF MINNESOTA SEMINAR/VANG 0174-4356 000351 OH 27181 <•> 1993/02/08 $238.51 $238.51* U S WEST CELLULAR TEtEPHONE 0129-4320 000361 OH 27182 <•> 1993/02/08 $529.15 $529.15* UNIVERSAL HIQHWA ‘ Pi OUCT PARTS 0249-4232 9416 OH 27183 <•> 1993/02/03 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $173.42 $81.21 $162.85 $162.41 $162.41 $24.36 $56.84 $118.34 -$37.89 $175.62 $104.96 $139.22 $1,323.75* US WEST COfMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE telephone TELEPHONE TELEPHONE FINAL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADV 0039-43 0069-^ ..^0 0174- 4320 0059-4320 0249-4320 0549-4320 C569-4320 0175- 4320 0175-4320 0129-4320 0590-4320 0590-4323 ■’62 * 00J62 000362 300362 000362 000362 000362 000362 000350 000350 000350 000350 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH C ’ OH OH 27114 <• > 1993/02/Qt $886.71 $886.71* VILLAGE CHEVROLET REPAIR 8426 0249-4341 CVCSS11923 OH 27185 <•> I9i3/02/0t $500.00 $500.00* W HENN PIONEER ASSN DONATION 0100-4385 000353 ON 27188 <•> 1993/02/08 $15.96 $15.06* WALTERS LINDA MILEAGE 0069-4381 000364 OH 27187 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 $22.76 $10.64 WECKMAN STEPHEN WECKMAN STEPHEN MILEAGE MILEAGE • 0174-4381 0174-4381 000352 000363 OH OH 4— council check register WEt). FEB 3. 1993. 10:17 PMamount VENDOR$33.40*27118 <• >1993/02/08 $8.75$8.75*27192<•>1993/02/08 $6,587.20 $6,587.20* 27193 <• > 1993/02/08 $3,950.00 $3,950.00* 27194 <• > 19P3/02/08 $138.86 $138.86* 2719S <• > 1993/02/08 $58.40 $58.40* 27196 <• > 1993/02/08 $8,866.32 $8,866.32* 27197 <•> 1993/02/08 $2,789.25 $2,789.25* 27191 <• > 1993/02/08 $36,029.92 136.029.92* 27199 <•> 1993/02/08 $80,680.57 $60,680.57* 27200 <•> 1993/02/08 $1,118.00 $1,118.00* 27201 <•> 1993/02/08 $1,091.84 $1,061.84* 27202 < • > 1993/02/08 $137.86 $137.86* 27203 <•> 1993/02/08 $164.00 $164.00* 27204 <•> 1993/02/08 $30.00 $30.00* 27205 <• > 1993/02/01 $325.00 $325.00* 2720Q <•> 1993/02/01 $498.72 $498.72*om1993/02/08 $2,658.72 12.898.72* 27201 1993/02/C8 15.59 AUS communications INC COLONIAL LIFE INS GROUP HEALTH PLAN MEDlCA choice MINNESOTA BENtFIT •description ACCOUNTNUMBER •POUTILITY0249-4324 000365 OHVOICE A DATA CABLING 82 0480-4520 11974 IP WH A TRANSFERRED 8999-2030 000039 IP INS WH 9999-2030 000030 IP INS WH 9999-2030 000031 IP WH FED TX MEDCR FICA 9999-2030 000038 IP CITY SHARE FICA/MEDCR 9999-2030 000037 IP NET PAYROLL TRANSFERRED 9999-2030 00Q04Q IP OFFICE FURNITURE ALL BLDG 0480-4540 000041 IP DEF COMP WH 9999 *2030 00Q028 IP WH INSURANCE 1/31A2/14 9999-2030 000020 IP MARK THOMTON6CO266780 9999-2030 000024 IP DALE SKREENIC0262310 9999-2030 000023 IP WH DEF COMP 9999-2030 000036 IP WH FEB O-ES 9999-2030 000022 IP WH INSURANCE 1/3112/14 9998-2030 000019 IP INSURANCE WH 1/31A2/14 9999-2030 000021 IP INS WH 9999-2030 OOQQ33 IP page 7 0 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. FEB 3. 1993, 10:17 PM page 8CHECK NO CHECK DATE <•>CHECK AMOUNT$5.59*VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL27209 < •) 27210 < • > 27211 <• > 27212 <* > 27213 <* > 27214 <*> 2-»215 <•> 27216 <•> 27217 <•> 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1393/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 1993/02/Ot 1993/02/08 1993/02/08 4 ?• $2,692.66 $2,692.66* $100.00 $100.00* MtnNESOTA dept OF REVENUE STATE TAX WH MN STATE RETIREME.NT-DEF C WH DEF COMP 9999-2030 000035 9999-2030 000027 $21.89 $21.89* PEBSCO/OBRA WH DEF COMP 9999-2030 000025 $643.46 $643.46* PEBSCO/US CONF of MAYORS WH DEF COMP 9999-2030 000026 $54.00 $54 00* $3,450.03 $3,450.03* $90,600 17 $90,600.17* PERA LIFE INS PERA PROGRESSIVE CONST INS WH PERA WH STUBBS BAY SWR RFPI5 9999-2030 000032 9999-2030 000034 0408-4531 000042 $5,545.53 $5,545 53* :>2l 00 $21 .00* 1417,334 11* PUMP & METER SERVICES INC FLOOR HOISTS FINAL PYMNT 0484-4520 68894M UNITED WAY CHARITY WH 9999-2030 000029 IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP 8 o g#•o *• ‘*-4 Cj COUNCIL CHLCK 3UWARY THU. FEB 4, 1993. 9:58 AM *♦*pa<Om FUND i 001 $46,793.43ar|FUND »423 $806.50?FUND i 424 $175.11H-FUND n 425 $73.108.30 r FUND •426 $95,982 8/ FUND •672 $104,455.67 i FUND i 673 $25,832.23 * FUND •674 $895.07 1 1 FUND t 999 $69,267.06 to $417.334.11* «) • . 7 )) I>5^ P T.-1 b ir m. 0%-.V 4 /•a'E?al=M r;.r ^ £.1 COUNCIL MEEHNG ft!* 8 V395 Cin OF ORONO «'. LEGISLATORS Senate District 33 P.it McGowan 425-8758 • House District 33B Warren Limmer 559-1774 Senate District 34 Gen Olson 472-3306 House District 34 B Todd Van Dellen 553-9088 Senate District 45 Aliu*dia Robertson 545-3715 House D' - ■; hSA Ron A' <*f 546-5356 House! strict 45B Pegg^/ LeppiU 546-3328 Congressional 3rd District Jim Ramstad 884-0266 Congressional 6th District Rod Grams 422-8570 County CommissionerDistrict 2 Sandra Hilar\* %529-3616 County CommissionerDistrict 6 John Kee^e 935-6049 County Commissioner District 7 Emily Aiinif Staples 473-9120 For More Information Call 593-5237 Telephone irectory of Your Elected OfficiaU 1993 Prepared by the League of \T\fmrn Valero oj the Plynwuth/Wayzatn area veilb funding from the League of Women Votero Education Fund CITY OFFICIALS SCHOOL BOARDS LONG LAKE City Ort'ice Todd Olson, Mayor Jim Hartfiel Dr. Maiy Mllier David Saw,er Sam Rettinger ORONO City OtTice Edward CaJIahan, Mayor J. Diann Goetten Joellen H«u*r Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelley PLYMOUTH City OlFice Kim Bergmiin, Mayor John Edson CiiTole Helliwell Joy Tierney Maria Vosilou WAYZATA City Ollice Robert Gisvold, A\a\-or Robert Ambrose Dick FLirmoti Greg Rye Barry Pctii 473-6961 473-4539 473-8806 476-1945 475-2269 473-5204 473-7357 473-8149 473-6633 471-9801 471-9256 475-1280 550-5000 557-7030 557-8633 557-1530 473-1681 473-2316 473-0234 473-2836 475-0420 473-8598 475-2363 475-3641 ORONO fl^ Odicc Don Anderson James Franklin Da\’id iMcKowan John Maresh Peg Swanson Martha Van de Ver \W\YZATA Paul luindry, Chair Howard Cos me v' John Dettloll Patricia Gleason Debra Jamroelewicz .Marv' Smith Marilu Theodore 473-7313 479-1810 479-2130 479-1692 475-3197 473-0603 475-0787 557-9432 476-8111 473-3347 4/ 0-0/ ()5 478-2162 4/-5-1388 473-2923 Other School Districts in this I>\\A'area: HOPKINS OSSEO ROBBINSDAI,E 933-9270 425-4131 533-2781 SUSTAINABLE RESOURCES j|il> Mnn »% «V .V A A CENTER January 29,1993 Mayor Ed Callahan ' City of Orono Box 66, Crystal Bay Orono, MN 55323 1916 St’conJ Avc'iur ' <fHfA Mintu'tipohs. MX 5>-fOJ - Tflepiumc (612) .‘iro -iiiS- Fax (612) 870-0729 * «v.nII] ' I ' I FEB 1 1993 Dear Mayor Callahan, This is a letter of. introduction for the weatherization services in your dty. Sustainable Resources Center has provided weatherization services to low-income constituents in the suburbs of Hennepin County for 13 years. We have teamed up with Ccmmunity Action for Suburban Hennepin in efforts to reach more of those eligible in your community with our services. Last fall, the Hennepin County Board elected not to continue its role as the administrator of the federal Weatherization Assistance Program and consequently the State Department of Jobs and Training has issued an RFP to select a permanent vendor. Enclosed you will find an executive summary and the table of contents to our proposal for this RFP. If you want to know more, we'd gladly send you the whole ' proposal. Or if you just want to know how many homes have been weatherized in your municipality since 1979, please feel free to give me a call. We would very much appreciate a letter of support from you during this public comment period. Tlie letter should be addressed to: David Geary Department of Jobs & Training 390 N. Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101. We have worked closely with Northwest Hennepin Human Services Planning Council on energy and housing services. Patty Wilder, Executive Director, can provide a reference if you need more information about us. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Michael Noble, Executive Director IJt^* fwtff im Sustainable R esources C enter Proposal for Suburban H ennepin Low -Income weatherization Executive Summary This proposal is respectfully being submitted by a consortium composed of ^e Sustainable Resources Center and Community Action for Suburban Hennepin to the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training in response to the Suburban Hennepin County Low-Income Weatherization Progpun Request for Proposals. The Sustainable Resources Center (SRC) is the lead organization for the consortium, and Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) is a subcontractor of SRC SRC will ad^ster the prognun and conduct the weatherization aedviries, while CASH will undertaJee to identify weatherization applicants and coordinate weatherization wth other suburban low-income housing programs. As the RFP requires, this consortium fully satisfies the four threshold requirements for a successful subgrantee under DOE Rules 10 CFR Part 440.15. Sustainable Resources Center (SRC) was formed on January 1, 1992 by the rnCTgcr of the Natural Resources Corporation and the Self-Reliance Center. By combining Natural Resources Corpon *'on's strong weatherization expertise with Self-Reliance Center's successful grass roots, low-income energy and food programs, the mergCT created ;m organization which has the ability to deliver its c nsiderable weatherization expertise more effectively to low-income communities. SRC's gtiiding principle is to promote self-reliance and sustainability by ad^ssing energy, food and environmental issues in ways that empower people, especially those with low-incomes. Its energy-related goals are to: (1) effectively coordinate energy services in an integrated manner in a "wholehouse" approach; ^ • i jj (2) provide the broad spectrum of energy services that more effectively address the resident’s needs; and (3) apply our collective field experience to improve energy services to our customers. The consortium of Sustainable Resources (Tenter (SRC) and Community Action for Suburban Hennepin is the outstanding applicant for selection as pcimanent vendOT of weatherization services. Some of the relevant facts about Sustainable Resources Center are as follows: SRC has effectively provided weatherization services to Hennepin County’s low- income community for 13 years. Federal regulations strongly favor existing providers who deliver quality services; Community Action for Suburban Hennepin is desi^ated by the Board Commissioners of Hennepin county as the community action agency for suburban Hennepin, and since 1986, it is the only agency responsible for suburban-wide multi-program low-income service delivery; i SRC customer surveys show an extremely high rate of customer sadsfacrion, indicating quality service, sensidve and skillful personnel and effeedve results delivered on a dmely basis; • SRC possesses the exisdng tools, systems, central locadon, staff support, and contracts to provide uninterrupted service to applicants in need. Any other vendor would netu at least 12 months to come sufficiently close to matching SRC’s quality, productivity and effectiveness; • SRC's current work force of 15 full-time, culturally diverse and carefully trained apprentices, crew managers and support personnel arc completely dependent upon a continuation of this work and cannot be retained if me contract is discontinued; SRC has contributed to local energy conservation effons with demonstrated leadership and innovation; SRC's record of achieving its weatherization unit goals is 99.5% over the 13 years of our experience. Only a small number of weatherization agencies in this state could match our record. In sumniary, public policy interests would be best scr/ed by retaining the current vendor which is effectively delivering d jcct weatherization services. SRC, as the current vendor, has a great advantage of efficiency by operating the weatherization program as a single integrated unit with our c wn union crews as employees, rather than just acting is adrninistrators and contractors to deliver one program. The subsequent proposal includes detailed evidence of SRC's srreng qualifications and experience in weatherization and promotion of self-reliance among low-income households in matters of energy. SUSTAIN/VBLE RESOURCES CENTER PROPOSAL FOR SUBURBAN HENNEPIN LOW-iNCOME WEATHERIZATION Table of Contents 1 0 7 A. BACKGROUND 1. Names and Locations......................................................................................... 2. Cost ................................................................................................................. 3. Units to be Weatherized..................................................................................... 4. History _ . „ . r. a. General - Introduction of Newly Created Sustainable Resources Center................... ^ b. History: Weatherization (1.). History: Weatherization Non-federal.............................................^ (2.) History: Housing Renovation Experience......................................-J (3.) History: DOE Weatherization......................................................5 History of Promoting New and Innovative Methods of Weatherization...............................................................................................^ 5. County-Wide Service Capability...........................................................................® 6. Service Delivery ....................................................................................................I. 7. Separation of Programs..........................................................................................' 8. Repotting Ability.............................................................. ® 9. Administration Costs.............................................................................................^ B. BUDGET Suburban Hennepin County Weatherizanon Budget............................................... Detail of Materials...............................;•....-y......A’Ac*'*‘tA-'V...........................Suburban Hennepin County Wca±enzaaon Budget, PVE &DOE - TAi A.............. Suburban Hennepin County Weatherization Budget, EAP/W>:.............................. Suburban Hennepin County Weatherization Budget, EAP/WX Form B................. Training and Technical Assistance Budget................................................-............... Training Priorities in 1993/94.................................................................................... ^ C. PROGRAM COMPO^^NTS 1. Applicant Identification a. Coordination with the Energy Assistance Program....................................to b. Identifying Applicants throu^ Hennepin County Social Service Providers ............................................-..................................................... 10 11 12 13 14 c. Identifying Priority Appacants............................-yy— d. How Social Service Agencies Refer Applicants and Identify 17 18 ...18High Priority Candidates.......................................................................... 2. Intake ^ , to a. EAP Applications Received Weekly by Modem......................................•* b. Direct Intake to Wea±erization...........................-.................................... c. The Appeal Procedure.............................................................................. d. Selection Process for Weatherization Recipients.........................-............. 3. Energy Audit oi a. Single Family Homes................................................................................ b. Multi-Family Housing................................—........................................."23 c. Mobile Homes.—......................................................................................, 4. Weatherization Services Using In-House Crews.....................................-............. 5. Inspection.............................................................................................................. D. INVENTORY CONTROL 1. General.................................................................................................................28 2. Plans to Procure Materials....................................................................................28 3. Use of Weaiherization Materials and Equipment...................................................28 4. Inventory Maintenance and Records......................................................................29 5. Determining the Cost of Invenio^ Used Per Job...................................................29 6. Inventory Valuation and Reconciliation.................................................................30 7. Inventory Storage and Security ..............................................................................30 E. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 1. Listening to Our Low-Income Customers to Meet their Requirements for Excellence......................................................................................................31 2. Use of Teams and Circles to Meet Performance Standards....................................32 3. Training Teams and Individuals to Meet Performance Requirements....................33 4. Setting and Maintaining Internal Standards of Performance...................................33 5. Setting and Meeting Standards for Safety Performance..........................................34 F. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION...................................................................................34 1. Organization and staffing .......................................................................................34 2. Accounting and Fiscal...........................................................................................35 a. Chan of Accounts......................................................................................35 b. Budget ......................................................................................................35 c. Information Flow.......................................................................................35 1. Cash Receipts Journal....................................................................35 2. Cash Disbursements Journal......................... 36 3. General Ledger ...............................................................................36 4. Accounts receivable Ledger ............................................................36 5. Accounts Payable Journal ..............................................................36 6. Pa^ll Journal...............................................................................37 d. Review/Distribution of Financial Statements.............................................37 e. Financial Reporting...................................................................................37 f. Annual Audit.............................................................................................37 3. Reporting Requirements.......................................................................................37 CERTIHCATION OF TIMELY AND ACCURATE REPORTING............................38 G. ASSURANCES AND CERTinCATIONS......................................................................39 H. WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE...............................................................40 J. OTHER INFORMATION..............................................................................................40 1. Organization Chart, Position Descriptions, Salary Levels and Wcathcrization staff biograplties........................................................................41-79 2. Letters of support from Hennepin County...........................................................80-81 3. Letter from financial contributor to WAP............................................................82 4. Letter of suppOTt from contiguous CAP agency ....................................................83 5. Letters about our community work in low-income neighborhoods.......................84-85 5. Letters of support from current weaiherization clients.........................................86-96 7. Letters of support from weaiherization clients saved in previous years ..................................................................................................97-120 List of Appendices A. Statement of Offer by CASH to form a consortium to deliver weatherization services and serve as subcontractor to SRC, 2 pages B. Letter from Community Involvement Programs summarizing SRC assistance in establishing CIP as a low-income housing developer C. Letter of endorsement by Jim Fitzgerald, nationally Imown weatherization trainer and M20 originator D. Coordination Plan, Energy Assistance Program and Weatiierizadon Pitigram, 1992-93 Heating Season E. Letter of endorsement from Bloomington HRA F. Cost Allocation Plan for Keeping Separate the Weatherization Assistance Program, 2 pages G. Chart of Accounts, 23 pages H. Reporting Capabilities and Recoids I. Letter of CPA firm re: experience and capability of Business Director J. Letter from APAC re: SRC participation in low-income community organizing and intensive neighborhood energy services. K. Letter from Emma Hixson, Executive Director, Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights, about SRC’s diverse work force and training she pro'nded to help SRC m its commitment to effectively serve diverse populations of low-ir:come residents. L. Mobile Home Procedures, 3 pages M. Additional Detail on Invesitory Concol, 2 pages N. Written comments from customer satisfaction surveys, 4 pages (Survey results are summarized on pages 31 and 32.) O Cover letter from Ricbc Cary and Associates responding to SRC RFP to listen to low-incomc weatherization recipients to continually improve the service and to mem fully meet their needs. P. Letter of endorsement from Pat Bristol, Carpenters Local 1644 Q. 1 of endorsement from Twin City Area Joint Apprenticeship Committee, citing SRC’s apprenticeship program track record. APPENDICES, Continued R. Board of Directors S. Accounting Procedures, 5 pages T. Time Cards, 2 pages U. Worker Compensation, proof of insurance V. Certificate of Compliance, Depanment of Human Rights TO: FROM: Mayor and City Counoil Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:February 3, 1993 SUBJECT: 1993 Adopted Budget Attached is the 1993 Budget adopted upon completion of the Truth in Taxation hearing. The adopted budget includes several changes from the proposed budget. 1. 2 . 3 . The Fire Budget includes $30,000 as the start of an equipment replacement fund. The Special Projects and Contingency Account includes a total amount of $88,392. $50,000 of this amount is for expenditures related to ensuring proper and sufficient technical data is included in MnDOT's Highway 12 corridor EIS process. A portion of this amount may aVso be Made available to offset potential reductions in State Aids. The Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund expenditures have been reduced from $13,720 to $3,120 to reflect the Council's authorization to replace several computers and printers in 1992 versus 1993. M CITY OF ORONO ORONO, MINNESOTA 1993 BUDGET FOR THE YEAR JANUARY 1, 1993 - DECEMBER 31, I993 ADOPTED DECEMBER 1, 1992 1992 CITTCOUNClIi BARBARA A. PETERSON, MAYOR EDWARD J. CALLAHAN CounciImember GABRIEL JABBOUR CounciImember City Administrator Ronald J. Moorse J. DIANN GOETTEN Cotinc i Imember MARY C. BUTLER CounciImember CITY OF ORONO ORONO, MINNESOTA ADOPTED 1993 BUDGETTABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal Introduction to Funds Comparison of 1992 Budget to 1993 Budget Revenues 1991 Actual - 1992 Estimate • 1993 Estimate Estimated Fund Balance Governmental Funds Y/E 12/3:./92 and Y/E 12/31/93 Estimated Retained Earnings Enterprise Funds Y/E 12/31/92 and Y/E 12/31/93 Tax Capacity Values, Tax Levies a Tax Capacity Rates, 1992 vs. 1993 General Fund Budget by Department City Council Administration Elections Assessing Finance Legal Government Buildings Human Services Police Protection Fire Protection Planning, Zoning 6 Protective Inspection Emergency Preparedness Animal Control Engineering Public Works - Street Maintenance Parks and Recreation Recycling 4 City Clean Up Reimbursable Expenses from developers k Police Spec. Services Special Projects k Contingency Page 11-111 IV-X XI XII XIII 1 2 4 6 0 10 11 13 14 17 18 20 21 22 23 25 27 26 29 CITY OP ORONO ORONO, MINNESOTA ADOPTED 1993 BUDGETTABLE OF CONTENTS Page Special Revenue Funds Park Fund 30 Improvement and Ecjuipment Outlay Fund 31 Building Capital Outlay Fund 32 Capital Pro-iect Funds Municipal State Aid Construction Fund 33 Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund 34 Debt Service Funds 1900 Improvement Bond Debt Fund 36 1902 Improvement Bond Debt Fund 37 1985 Improvement Bond Debt Fund 30 1992 Improvement Bond Debt Fund 39 1991 Public Facility Rev Bond Debt Fund 40 Enterprise Funds Water Operating Fund 41 Sewer Operating Fund 45 Golf Course Operating Fund 49 Personal Services Allocation by Department, 1992-1993 52 Cumulative Budget Information - Appendix "A" 54 Minutes of the 1993 Budget Hearing Held 12/1/92 55 Resolution to Adopt the 1993 Budget 57 Resolution to Adopt the Final 1992 Tax Levy Collectible in 1993 58 Resolution to Establish the 1993 Salaries 59 Compensation Plan - Point/Position Groupings 60 Compensation Plan - Expected Performance Levels 61 Compensation Plan - Step Eligibility 62 //•'' \\ tO O <\ N\ W CITY of ORONO Municipal Offkes Fin4 Odkc B<i\ 66 Cns^ Ba>* Minne^ila 5532.' LETTER OP TRANSMITTAL The Honorable Mayor and City Council: Submitted herewith is the adopted 1993 Annual Budget. The enclosed 1993 Budget reflects an effort to hold the line on activity along with the uncertain State fiscal climate caused y the projected $750 million State Budget shortfall. The 1993 Budget provides for maintaining and improving the level and quality of service provided to the community while providing a framework for sound fiscal management. Respectfully submitted, Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator rtlH’HONI - • KAX - 473>«.<I0 M 91487.3a(46)CITY OF ORONOIMTRODOCTION TO BUDGETED FUNDSThe City of Orono operates under "Optional Plan A" form of government as defined in the State of Minnesota Statutes. The City Council, composed of an elected mayor and four elected counc i Iniember s, exercises legislative authority and determines all matters of policy. The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. A fund is defined as a fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts to record cash and other resources, together with related liabilities and balances. Funds are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or objectives under special regulations, restrictions or limitations. The City prepares budgets for the following funds, grouped by fund type. 1. Governmental Funds tyoes are those through which most governmental functions are financed and include the following funds: a) General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. b) Special Revenue Funds - Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than special assessments, expendable trusts, or major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes. included in this fund type are: Park Fund Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund Building Capital Outlay Fund c) Debt Service Funds - Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general long-term debt principal, interest, and related costs. Included in this fund type are: 1980 Improvement Bond Fund 1982 Improvement Bond Fund 1985 Improvement Bond Fund 1991 Public Improvement Rev Bond Fund 1992 Improvement Bond Fund The debt service funds appear as information only. Formal budgets are not required annually as the schedule of bond redemption and sources of revenue are established at tie time of bond sale. d.) Capital Project Funds - Capital Project Funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by proprietary funds and trust funds. Included In this fund type are: Municipal State Aid Construction Fund Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund 2. Proprietary Fund Types are used to account for the City's activities which are similar to the private sector. The City has three (3) Enterprise or Proprietary Funds wherein the cost, of providing goods the general public on a continuing basis are to be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Includeo in this fund type are: Water Operating Fund Sewer Operating Fund Golf Course Operating Fund GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION ELECTIONS ASSESSING FINANCE LEGAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS HUMAN SERVICES POLICE FIRE PLANNING 6 ZONING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ANIMAL CONTROL ENGINEERING STREET MAINTENANCE PARKS & RECREATION RECYCLING REIMBURSEABLE FROM DEVEL. REIMBURSEABLE-POLICE SPEC SERVICES SPECIAL PROJECTS AND CONTINO EQUIPMENT OUTLAY FUND BUILDING OUTLAY FUND PIR FUND TOTAL GENERAL FUND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS PARK FUND IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT OUTLAY BUILDING OUTLAY TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS TOTAL GENERAL AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 1991ACTUAL EXPEND 65 171 71 151 137 40 13 1,022 183 203 6 13 4 474 44 79 31 6 40 60 2,905,633 147,184 GENERAL AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS1992 DEPARTMENT VS 1993 DEPARTMENT BUDGET ,854 ,304 731 ,494 ,006 ,581 ,379 ,760 ,635 ,577 ,388 ,675 ,862 ,745 ,350 ,792 ,715 ,810 ,787 ,438 ,750 0 0 0 44,494 102,690 $3,052,017 1992ADOPTED BUDGET 68 168 16 74 156 107 44 14 1,102 195 307 3 14 4 493 55 67 27 9 32 62 ,530 ,020 , 170 ,600 ,480 ,000 ,080 ,210 ,030 ,510 ,940 ,350 ,170 ,950 ,260 , 110 ,320 ,000 ,0C0 ,450 ,800 0 0 3,024,890 6,100 122,500 105,800 234,400 $3,259,290 craiaBeaasazaass! 1993PROPOSED BUDGET 58 188 3 77 160 86 66 14 1,142 192 310 3 14 4 489 53 91 12 0 88 64 ,618 ,217 ,660 ,198 ,682 ,200 ,690 ,670 ,905 ,670 ,917 ,950 ,245 ,130 , 175 , 396 ,460 ,000 ,489 ,392 ,900 0 0 3,132,572 0 3,120 117,860 120,980 $3,253,552 >aa Bai 1993 BUDGET OVER (UNDER) 1992 BUDGET % OP1993 BUDGET OVER (UNDER) 1992 BUDGET i 9,912) 9,397 (12,510) ',510 202 ,800) ,.2,610 460 40,875 (2,832) 2,977 600 75 (820 (4,085 1,744 24,140 (15,000) (511 55,942 2,100 0 0 107,682 (6,100) (119,300) 12,060 (113,42oJ (5,730) -14.46% 11.49% -77.37% 3.37% 2.69% -19.44% 51.29% 3.24% 3.71% -1.45% 0.97% 17.91% 0.53% -16.57% -0.83% -3.16% 35.86% -55.56% -5.68% 172.39% 3.34% 3.56% -100.00% -97.45% 11.40% -48.39% -0.18% CITY or ORONOSSFSffliS? ¥ 1991 ACTUAL EXPEND 1992 ADOPTED BUDGET 1993 PROPOSED BUDGET CAPTIAL PROJECT FUNDS TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS improvementbond1902 IMPROVEMENT BOND 1985 IMPROVEMENT BOND Jloi building bond1992 IMPROVEMENT BOND TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS WATER FUND: CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1989 IMP BOND DEBT ' OPERATIONS TOTAL WATER FUND SEWER FUNOi C^STRUCTION PROJECTS 1989 IMP BOND DEBT OPERATIONS TOTAL SEWER FUND GOLF COURSE FUNOl OPERATIONS % OF 31,140 151,141 182,281 tsaasarvsas Total enterprise funds 110,543 30,400 102,650 0 0 1,560,000 67,650 1,627,650 'sssaxsassasn 104,420 31,410 109,000 157,132 <7 2,060,000 65,735 2,125,735 raeaaaaaaaaaa aaai 90,240 24,860 104,690 234,848 148290 aai 251,593 401,962 61o7928 500,000 a,915) 498,085 laaaaaa a 6,180 6, 550 4,310 7,716 148,290 208,966 oeaaaaaaaa 32.1% “2.8% 3o76% :a>aaa -5.9% •20.9% -4.0% 49.5% 0.0% 52.0% 138,026 76,526 201,400 546,600 77,250 230,240 0 72,005 215,200 (546,600 (5,245 (23,040 415,952 862,090 287,205 10,037 74,710 475.108 553.800 75,460 542.800 553,800 70,320 642,294 0 (5,140) 99,494 560,655 1,172,060 1,266,414 108,770 119,270 122,475 1,085,377 **«*aaaaa»2,153,420 ■■••*aaaaaaaa ^__^1,676,094 _^__^(477,326) III ■100.0% -6.8% “9.7% -66.7% 0.0% -6.8% 18.3% 8.1% 2.7% ■22.2% CITY OF ORONO GENERAL FUND REVENUES 1991ACTUALTAXESGENERAL PROPERTY TAXES SPECIAL LEVY-SEWER ASMNTS CITY BLDG SPECIAL LEVY-TAX ABATEMENTS PENALITIES & INTEREST ON DELINQUENT TAXES 1,618,66402,224 LICENSES & PERMITS 81,202 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE FEDERAL GRANT-EMERGENCY PREP LC'TAL GOVERNMENT AID POLICE TOWN AID POLICE TRAINING RBIM MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS AIDS/GRANTS FROM LMCD/DNR COUNTY GRANT-RECYCLING PROGRAM CHARGES FOR SERVICES GENERAL SERVICE FEES PLAN CHECK 6 SITE EXAM FEES CONDITIONAL USE-VARIANCE & SUBDIVISION FEES VARIABLE ADD'L LAND USE FEES ON-SITE SEPTIC PROGRAM FEES CONTRACTED POLICE SERVICES CONTRACTED INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACTED ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACTED PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES LEGAL & ELECTION FILING FEES SPECIAL POLICE SERVICES S POLICE REPORTS FALSE ALARM FEES ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS ASSESSMENT SEARCHES PERMIT MAIL IN FEES RECYCLING PROGRAM FEES PERMITS/SAC ADMIN FEES 4,556 0 73,732 6,064 59,996 0 33,872 ,041 ,337 ,026 ,592 29,490 566,544 8,399 252 116 0 812 894 200 432 790 166 400 205 FINES b FORFEITS COURT FINES ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES FORFEITURES/CONFISCATIONS 71,500 1,245 0 MISCELLANEOUS INTEREST INCOME R1TNTQ SALE OF PROPERTY INSURANCE DIVIDENDS OTHER 43,897 5,400 4,286 11,689 3,929 TRANSFERS IN-PIR FUND (CRD 15 ST. LIGHTS) -BLDG 0/L FUND (CUP-hENT OPER) USE OF FUND BALANCE 17,487 102,690 0 1992BUDGET 1993BUDGET 1993 BUDGET OVER/UNDER 1992 BUDGETAMOUNT1,644,8315,6306,2209,999 1,775,9155,35018,970 131,084(280)12,750(9,999)8.0% 115,000 104,257 (10,743) 100.0% -9.3% 5,000 0 72,150 5,200 65,000 0 38,250 4,000 0 74.000 5,200 68.000 0 56,700 (1,000) 0 1,850 0 3,000 0 18,450 -20.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 4.6% 0.0% 48.2% 1,000 50.000 31.000 1,000 40,000 26,800 0 57,300 589,000 6,000 58,250^ V/ f dm ijyj 579,950 5,000 200 1,500 0 9,000 1,000 1,500 260 200 6,000 4.000 2.500 0 8.500 1.000 1,200 30,750 200 400 500 200 200 400 500 0 (10,000 (4,200 (6,000 (950 9,050 1,000 800 1,000 0 (500) 0 (300) 21,490 (1,000) 0 2,000 0 0.0% -20.0% -13.5% 100.0% -1.6% 1.6% 20.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% -5.6% 0.0% -20.0% 232.1% -45.5% 0.0% 6.2% 0.0% 70,000 1,000 5,000 60,000 1,000 0 (10,000) 0 (5,000) -14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 46,500 5,400 4,300 8,000 2,000 35,000 6,600 4,300 8,000 500 (11,500) 1,200 0 0 0 -24.7% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17,650 105,800 0 15,735 84,695 (1,915 21,105 0 0.0% -19.9% 0.0% TOTAL 2,868,129 3,024,890 3,132,572 107,682 3.6% i CITY OF OnONOSPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS REVENUES 1991 ACTUAL 1992 BUDGET 1993 BUDGET • 1993 BUDGET OVER/UNDER 1992 BUDGET AMOUNT % PARK FUND PARK DEDICATIOW INTEREST INCOME 8,780 14,682 30.000 15.000 10,000 12,400 (20,000) (2,600) -66.7% -17.3% 23,462 aBfBaaasssassns 45,000 aesaaasaaassa 22,400 asesaaaaaaaaa (22,600)-50.2% aaaaa IMPROVEMENT 6 EQUIPMENT OUTLAY FUND USER PEES INTEREST INCOME SALE OP EQUIPMENT OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 3,723 15,228 335 60,750 4,200 17,000 62,800 4,200 10,000 0 64,900 0 (7,000) 2,100 0.0% -41.2% 3.3% 80,036 ■aaaeaasaaaaa 84,000 aaaaaaaaaaaaa 79,100 aaaaaaaaaaaaa (4,900) aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa -5.8% BUILDING CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND INTEREST INCOME 179,972 160,000 110,000 (50,000)-31.3% OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 0 0 0 0 0.0% 179,972 160,000 110,000 (50,000)-31.3% TOTAL SPECIAL REVEIJUB FUNDS 283,470 289,000 aaaaaaaaaaaaaea aaarseaxaaaaai 211,500 a aaaaaaaaaaaai (77,500) -26.8% a aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa CITY or ORONOCAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS REVENUES 1991ACTUAL 1992BUDGET 1993BUDGET 1993 BUDGET OVEP./UNDER 1992 BUDGETAMOUNT %MUNICIPAL STATE-AID CONSTRUCTION: STATE AID FOR BIKE/HIKE TRAIL STATE AID FOR CONSTRUCTION STATE AID FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 032,0980 1,000,000560,000 500.000 1,000,000560.000 500,00000 0.0%0.0%0.0% • 1 PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING: 32,098SBassssssasss;*1,560,000KsaassaBsssss 2,060,000ssaaaaaaaaaaa 500,000-=as*aaaaaB-stat=ar aBBaaaBaa 32.1% SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: C RD 15 STREET LIGHTS WOCOHILL AVENUE IMP HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS OTHER INTEREST INCOME TRANSFERS IN-FROM GENERAL FUND TRANSFERS IN-FROM MSA FUND 17,488 3,852 6,964 161 57,562 0 0 17,650 820 0 0 45,800 0 0 15,735 410 1,985 0 32,150 0 0 (1,9151 -10.8% (410) -50.0% 1»985 0.0%0 (13,650) -29.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 86,027 64,270 MBaaaaBssasaa 50,280 aBBaaaaaaaaBa (13,990)21.8% CITY OP ORONODEBT SERVICE FUNDS REVENUES1980 IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1991ACTUAL 1992BUDGET 1993BUDGET AMOUNT %TAXES GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES PENALTIES & INTEREST SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS INTEREST INCOME 16,926 18 79,267 35,013 16,800 0 50,830 34,600 16,100 0 39,115 22,950 <'00) -4.2% /11 TIC. 0*0'-23.0% _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-33.7% 131,224 ■iKSBaaaxetsateBics 102,230 ssssaassssaasaaes 78,165 saaaaaaaassssa (24,065) -23.5% 1982 IMPROVEMENT BONOS property TAXES SPECIAL ASSESMENTS INTEREST INCOME 5,261 4,805 8,386 5,500 4,440 8,200 5,500 4,080 4,200 0 (360 0.0% -8.1% 18,452 ■»*sreaaaaaaaaa 13,780 aaaaaaaasea-ss _ _ _<L2!2'_ _ _-2«-o' 1985 IMPROVEMENT BONDS TAXES GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES PENALTIES 6 INTEREST SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPEC ASMNTS-CITY PROP INTEREST INCOME 39,793 55 h 47,748 5,910 12,964 50,000 0 32,350 5,630 10,050 50,000 0 27,540 5,350 8,400 0 0 (4,8101 (780 (1,650 0.0% 0.0% -14.9% -5.0% -16.4% 106,470 98,030 (i7740)' -6.9% 1991 HRA BUILDING BONOS GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 232,400 0 170 0 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST 1NC0M»I TRANSFER IN-BL.O' <!i FD Q 414,230 469 0 249,000 0 500 33,165 16,600 0 330 33,165 7.1% 0.0% 194.1% 0.0% 414,699 232,570 282,665 50,095 21.5% 1992 IMPROVEMENT BONDS bond PROCEEDS 68,750SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 0n 0 (68,750) 220,500 -100.0% 0.0%INTEREST INCOME 0 0 800 220,500 1,300 0 152,250 218.9% VII CITY OP ORONO ENTERPRISE FUNDS REVENUESHATER OPERATING FUNDWATER SALES - AREA 1 WATER SALES - AREA 2 WATER SALES - AREA 3 WATER SALES-AREA 4 total water sales INTEREST INCOME MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE total revenue CP :DIT FOR DEPRECIATION ON CONTRIBUTED ASSETS TOTAL REVENUE & CREDITS FROM OPERATIONS DEBT SERVICE! SPECIAL ASSESSM'ENTS INTEREST INCOME TOTAL REVENUE FROM DEBT SERVICE CONSTRUCTION! INTEREST INCOME TOT. L REVENUE FROM DERT SERVICE 1991ACTUAL 1992BUDGET 1993BUDGET 1993 BUDGET OVER/UNDER 1992 BUDGETAMOUNT %112,96029,831 8,870 1,538 127,20041,400 11,970 5,250 130,00030.000 10.000 2,500 153,199 185,820 172,500 8,585 9.500 1.500 9,900 1,500 165,737 196,820 183,900 33,328 33,330 33,330 199,065 :SSS9BB99 23" 50 99T9PB999m ^999 217,230 99999999999as 22,570 19,920 15,200 16,749 11,100 2,800 (11,400 1,970 2,750 2.2%27.5% 16.5% 52.4% (13,320) 400 0 -7.2t 4.2% 0.0% (12,920) 0 6.6% 0.0% (12,920) !8StSSS9ai9«t9%B 1,180) 4,100) -5.6% -5.9% -27.0% 39,074 35,120 9»*«9a»3saB«e = ss iRr»-se«*a999«9a9 29,840 (5,280) «9«««*99tS»9n9 a«99*999«9B99 45,235 ____0 0 mmmm\ 45,235 tS9rS999 0 0 0 0 -15.0% 0.0% B9S9S999K9S9VI 999!199!199993 0.0% i*jeiii»*«*«*** Vlll CITY OP ORONO ENTERPRISE FUNDS REVENUES SEWER OPERATING FUND SEWER USER CHARGES PENALITIES ON DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS UNIT CHARGES MWCC-CVC-INTEREST MWCC-DEFERRED GAIN INTEREST INCOME MISCELLANEOUS INCOME CREDIT FOR DEPRECIATION ON CONTRIBUTED ASSETS TOTAL REVENUE & CREDITS FROM OPERATIONS DEBT SERVICE! SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS INTEREST INCOME TOTAL REVENUE FROM DEBT SERVICE CONSTRUCTION! INTEREST INCOME TOTAL REVENUE FROM CONSTRUCTION 1991 1992 1993 1993 BUDGET OVER/UNDER1992 BUDGETACTUAL,BUDGET BUDGET AMOUNT % 382,231 395,700 395,500 (200)-0.1%14,147 11,''OO 14,200 3,200 29.1%4,513 3,000 3,000 0 0.0%15,191 14,440 13,670 (770)-5.3%9,530 9,530 9,530 0 0.0%66,017 50,000 50,000 0 0.0%2,412 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% 494,841 485,670 487,900 2,230 0.5% 132,041 127,600 132,040 4,440 3.5% 626,832 613,270 619,940 6,670 1.1%= —sEcr-s9 3 = 3SSSS38SaHS vsaasaasa'asaa aaaaaaaa'aaaaa 46,002 32,700 32,700 0 0.0%14,162 15,000 10,000 (5,000)-33.3% 60,164 47,700 42,700 (5,000)-10.5% XSSSSS8SSSSSSr£SS3 asBsasaesssss aSSSSSaS3S898 aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaa 47,193 20,850 .16,000 (4,850)-23.3% 47,193 20,850 16,000 (4,050)-23.3% 8S9ssasBsas=3 tss = as3sr:sas3ai aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaataaaaa Ijklt ; ■'TCITY OP ORONO E.NTERPRISB FUNDS REVENUES 1991ACTUAL 1992BUDGET 1993BUDGET 1993 BUDGET OVER/UNDER 1992 BUDGETAMOUNT % GOLF OPERATING FUND GREEN FEES 101,061 100,000 107,000 7,000 7.0% CONCESSIONS GROSS PROFIT 3,783 8,000 5,000 (3,000)“37.5% EQUIPMENT RENTALS 24,090 29,650 25 "OO 4,150)-14.0% INTEREST INCOME 2,942 1,850 2, i 00 1,050 56.8% MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 2,498 1,500 1, jOO 0 0.0% TOTAL REVENUE 134,374 141,000 141,900 900 0.6% CREDIT FOR DEPRECIATION ON CONTRIBUTED ASSETS 250 250 250 0 0.0% TOTAL REVENUE fi CREDITS FROM OPERATIONS 134,624 141,250 142,150 900 0.6% ssa5=r = = r=rr = = sss =r csssssszssssssa = =:rr = =ssssse9s9s sS8993sS;a9 = s« aanssasassasa i CITY OF ORONOESTIMATED FUND BALAMCE/RETAINEO EARNINGS 12-31-93 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS CAPITALGENERAL IMP. * BUILDINGfund park EQUIP 0/L CAP. 0/Lgt!*aajjs2es5aeaas»sa#axaxassassssssssssssss3:s" r r xx MUNIC STATE AID PERM IMP REVOLVING FUND BALANCE 12-31-91 985,750 236,660 253,150 2,648,190 EST. REVENUES 1992 2,901,440 45,000 21,200 160,000 EST. EXPENDITURES 1V92 2,962,090 6,100 122,500 0 TRANSFERS IN 1992 123,450 0 62,800 C TRANSFER OUT 1992 62,800 0 0 105,800 FUND BALANCE 12-31-92 985,750 275,560 214,650 2,702,390 EST. REVENUES 1993 3,032,142 22,400 14,200 110,000 EST. EXPENDITURES 1993 3,067,672 0 2,920 0 TRANSFERS IN 1993 100,430 0 64,900 0 TRANSFER OUT 1993 64,900 0 0 117,860 FiJhO BALANCE 12-31-93 985,750 aaaaeaxmxX 297,960 aaexaxasaai 290,830 »a*xxxx = = =. 2,694,530 axsrxxxxxx •FUND BALANCE COMPONENTS: RESERVED FOR: PREPAID ITEMS ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS 60,000 23,515 DESIGNATED FOR: VACATION S SEVERENCE 112,5(K) WORKING CAPITAL 650,000 PARK IMPROVEMENTS IMP i EQUIP OUTLAYS MUNIC BLDG CONSR S CAP 0/L 297,960 290,830 2,694,530 DEBT SERVICE ROAD/BRIOGE PROi EMERGENCIES UNOESICNATED 139,735 1980 1982 1985 1992 1991IMP BONO IMP BONO IMP BOND IMP BONO HRA BONDrr==--xxsrrxxxxaxxx-:xaxxaaaaxraxxrraxxxaxxxxxxxxx = = = = ==== xxxxxaarrxxxxrxrxaxaarra 522,690 119,490 160,370 0 414,700 (400) 597,420 TOTAL FUND lALAMCE 985,750 297,960 ■aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa 290,830 2,694,530 iaaaaaaaaa aaaaxaaaaas 102,230 18,140 98,030 69,550 232,570 0 64,270 104,420 31,410 109,000 0 157,130 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,650 520,500 103,220 149,400 69,550 490,140 (400)594,040 78,165 13,780 91,290 221,800 249,500 2,060,400 50,280 98,240 24,860 104,690 140,290 234,850 2,060,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 33,165 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,735 500,425 sraxxaaasa 95,140 xaaxaaexaa 136,000 Ksczsasssa 143,060 537,955 SSSxaaxsas aaxaexasxa 0 aaaaaaaaaa 578,585 BBxaaaaxas 500,425 95,140 136,000 143,060 537,955 0 160,000 415,000 3,585 500,425 aaaxxKssxra 95,140 aaaaaxaxaaa 136,000 aaaaxaaaaaa 143,060 537,955 aaaxaaexaaa aaaaausva 0 xesxxaaaaaa 578,585 CITY or ORONOESTIMATED RETAINED EARNINGS 12-31-93 WATER SEWER GOLF RETAINED EARNINGS 12-31-91 EST. REVENUES 1992 EST. EXPENSES 1992 (1) NET DEPRECIATION - 1992 TRANSFER IN 1992 TRANSFER OUT 1992 RETAINED EARNINGS 12-31-92 EST. REVENUES 1993 EST. EXPENSES 1992 (2) NET DEPRECIATION - OP 1993 TRANSFERS IN 1993 TRANSFER OUT 1993 RETAINED EARNINGS 12-31-93 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES EXCLUDED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES EXCLUDED 143,450 1,503,990 ssaesassatsEBss! 108,550 231,940 554,220 141,000 276,690 486,160 114,770 5,470 4,500 4,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 93,230 1,567,550 130,530 213,740 546,600 141,900 239,545 567,595 117,265 14,330 12,980 4,960 0 0 0 0 0 0 53,095 1,533,575 150,205 650,000 0 75,700 658,800 27,900 2,610 XTI CITY OF ORONOTAX CAPACITY VALUES, TAX LEVIES, A ACTUAL 1992 VS ESTIKATED l993 AND TAX CAPACITY RATES COLLECTIBLE COLLECTIBLE (DECREASE) 1992 1993 INCREASE % TAX CAPACITY $13,164,582 $11,841,391 ($1,323,191)-10.1% sstr.tsKssassBsaa ssssseasasssB ssaeasETSssssa TAX LEVIES GENERAL $1,656,681 $1,800,235 $143,554 8.7% SEWER & HATER BOND DEBT 72,300 71,600 ($700) $16,600 -1.0% BUILDING BOND - HRA 232,400 249,000 7.1% TOTALS 1,961,381 2,120,835 159,454 8.It TAX CAPACITY RATE GENERAL 12.022 %13.238%1.216 %10.10 % SEWER BOND DEBT 0.525%0.527%0.002 %0.40 % BUILDING BOND - HRA 1.686 %1.831%0.145 %8.60 % TOTALS 14.233%15.596%1.363 %9.60 % XIII CITY OF ORONO01 GENERAL FUND PROG 020 OIV 11 CITY COUNCIL1991 1992410041424153•••* 4210 4240 •••• 4300 4306 * I** 4:21 « 4322 4323 •••• 4340 •*«# 4356 •••• 4380 4382 4393 4399 r-T-D 1993DEPT 1993MGRSALARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE FICA/MOCR-CITY CONTRIB workmans comp INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES books t PERIODICALS total SUPPLIES MAIN REPAI AUDITING i FINANCIAL OTHER CONSULTING TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE POSTAGE TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING t PUBLISHING ADVERTISING TOTAL PRINTING-PUBLISH-AO MAINT OFFICE EQUIPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR MEETINGS-CONF-SCHOOLS TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERV MEMBERSHIPS MEET IMG EXPENSES SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT OTHER CHARGES total other charges TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION . DOLLAR1993 INCREASE(DECREASE)actual budget 5-31-92 REQUEST RFrni^ innoTm 1°^C*EASE) INCREASE_REC^^^W^ FROM PR,0^ YR (DECREASE)14717 T5200 6333 15200 .. . . . .684573 1170600 316287 1170350 152001170350 -===2ssssass-ssssss15200 0 Paqe 1REMARKS1170350 15974 16970 6936 ■*sasassa=asrss3sss*saax 264 300 2V6 200 500 ■■■•■■“si .. . . . . . .'"—J 27 27 200 200 200 0-250 ■250 :a: 0 0 0.000.00-0.42 0.00 10036 9770 3930 10365 10365 10365 10036 aaaaaa 0 9770 10365 0 0 0.00 '-saaaaaaaaaraaaaa 595 U.06 4047 10365 10365 *SBaBS8rsBss»assa«sssasa»a----_2__ 0 10365 15 100 0 100 15 100 0 100 = = ==s = ==sraaaaaa; 0 595 48 1280 !s=Baa3BaaBBBaBB3BaaaaraBBBraraBBaa3aBB3 500 100 100 100 0 100 100 0 0.00 0.06 saaaas 0.00 1328 600 0 ■aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: 500 500 500 100 100 100 600 600 600 0.00 aaras.BaBr = saararraaaaaaaaaaaaaa 0 0.00 0 0.00 . . .?. . .100 ■ .a.8aa«...B,I®BB...333 = «aBaaaI=LaB3.Ba3-3--a- ^ 0.031638 1200 45 ipnn 1638 1200 ■aaaaaaaaeaaraaaaaarar 45 1200 1200 45 1200 1200 0.00 35348 952 0 267 38.490 500 100 0 aSBBBaaaaBassaaaasasasaaaaaa 28530 1200 0.00 17016 30 0 255 56567 39290 17301 *'“■*■•***■■***»*.338.383333 500 0 0 29030 28530 500 0 0 38838383838838388383388388883838 -1016028530 500 0 0 0 •100 0 •0.26 0.00 LMCD -1.00 AMM 0.00 . . .LMC -0.26 OTHER29030 29030 -10260 3.3888. 883.338. .8338383 3338883=88 88883338 8883.8888-83 01 GENERAL FUND PRQQ 020 OIV 11 CITY COUNCIL 1992 memberships 32100 1940 4550 100 38690 11I n ■11 LOGIS-APPLICATIONS DATA PROCESSING TOTAL DATA PROCESSING MEET INGS-CONf-SCHOOL TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE EQUIPMENT FLOATERS INSURANCE AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE BONDS INSURANCE UMBRELLA LIABILITY INSURANCE INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD TOTAL INSURANCES MEMBERSHIPSTRAVEL-MILEAGE-PARKINC MEETING EXPENSES LICENSES A TAXES SPEC CWIP REPLACEMENT OTHER CHARGES TOTAL OTHER CHARGES TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION Page 3199iMGR1993DOLLARINCREASE(DECREASE)100 260 26^. . .2m"'805 1800 1112 2800 2800asa=s=s=a.s=a3s=SBse=r==i====r===ss====s==33aa 1130 1190 ZBOO 1000 0.561309 13091700187187 18700030033333315100166116611661160017617617630600336633663366 7025 2100 768 2150350010443600 200 112 200 0 5 0 1300 174 1330 90 0 7100 2193 7280 = = rrrc = -r==rrr = r = r = -z = r===ascncx==c==s=a!xr!==r===rr3 2150 2150 SO n acBaaax:aaasr3 = ras.-r-;asss 7280 7280 180 raaaaxaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarraarrrarsrrraraa 0.03 aaaaaaaaaaaaaa 171304 168820 63296 188217 188217 188217 aaaaraaaaasrraasssgasjasaraarr saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaBaarraarr=a=r 19397 0.11 saassaaazaaaxaaaai 01 GENERAL FUND PR(XS 039 DIV 12 ADMINISTRATION Page 3 • ’^;s CITY OF OR( 01 GENERAL 01 (^NEKA CITY OF ORONO01 GENERAl FUND PROG 040 OlV 13 ELECTIONS Page 41991ACTUAL1992BUDGETDOLLAR1993 1993 1993 INCREASE %Y-T-D DEPT MGR (DECREASE) INCREASE5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMHD ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE)REMARKSSALARIES-regular EMPLOYEE OVERT IHE-REGULAR EMPLOYEE SALARIES-lEMP EMPLOYEES PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION FICA/MDCR-CITY CONTRIB UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIRS LEGAL CONSUL!ING SERVICE OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POSTAGE 338 433000150194006580210460 707150144438111 165000801300 1650008013001860 1650 0 0 80 130 0 2680 -400 -6580 -130 -330 0-10120 -0.62-1.00-1.00-0.62-0.720.00-0.84372 11980 2450 1860 1860 1860BaBssasaaaassrsszssrrasssssssssssrsrcr = = = 5: = = = = = = = = -^5^35 1000 22 100 100 100 -900 -0.90-900 0.9035 1000 22 100 100 100 2L 0 0 0 0 0.00 TOTAL COHWWICATIONS PRINTING & PUBLISHING ADVERTISING TOTAL PRINTING-PUBLISH-AD MAINT OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINT MISC EQUIP TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR ICE TINGS • CONF - SCHOOLS TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE EQUIPMENT FLOATERS INS TOTAL INSURANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0.00240000000.003rr8saearara8eaaaaaBaraaaaaaarrBr8ax8aaa=sas=r====B===-=ss=***==--=**-*-"--*=*~“162 1000 64 220 220 220 -780 -0.78 16?1000 64 220 220 220 -780 -0.78 asrBsaBsrsrsxx==a2Ss=ssBsrsa==asrasBS8asasa=rssBas83ssBaaBsarassasasBa33Ssss==SB 0 430 88 0 0 0 -430 -1.00 31 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 430 119 0 0 0 -430 -1.00 B==sars3333388=Bsrx*3aarssasr8assas3SSBaBBB338rBass3saB338aasas3SSSS=3:S333333333 0 310 958 1360 1360 1360 1050 3.39 0 1050 0 0 0 -1050 -1.00 0 1360 958 1360 ^360 1360 0 0.00 ■88883383=333rsaBBSBaBasraBassaaasrrxaBssaaaaBaaaasaasasassaaaaBasssaasar3583383 0 100 0 50 50 50 -50 -0.50 0 100 0 50 50 50 -50 -0.50 a.B..asKxa.a)es.ssssKsxssssBss..assssz 126 0 rrcr=arrraaaaaarseaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaa 0 0 0 0.00 0.00126 0 0 0 0 0 0 aararaaraaaaeaaaaaaaaBaBBaaaaaaaaaaaaBBsaacrBxaaaaaaaasraraaaaaaaaaaaBaaaaaeaaaB 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 040 OIV 13 ELECTIONS Page 4 4381 TRAVEL*4382 MEET INI4393SPEC El....TOTAL 1TOTAL AMOUNTS T! 01 GENERAL FUffi 4fOO SALAI4111GVfRl4120SAIAH4141RERA-4142 FICA/4151 m>spi4152LIFE4153UORKM TOTAL 4210 OFFIC 4240 aooics TOTAL 4306 OTHER 4307 ASSES! • ***TOTAL 4320 TEIEW 4321 l>OSTAC ••••TOTAL 4322 RRINTI 4323 ADVERT TOTAL 4331 EOUIRH •*«#total • Ml < 1993 DOLLAR1W1199219931993INCREASE Xy-T-0 DEPT MGR (DECREASE)INCREASEACTUALBUDGET5-31-9?REQUEST RECOHMO ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE)SS2.8SSSSrSa3SCSaS8;.*SS3CS3SS3:SSSSS88S8S333SSS8SS3 3 = SS3S = S-'P~«<-9e9»«>~-0 0 0 0 0.004340KAINT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 400 350 104 361 361 361 11 0.03TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR 400 350 104 361 361 361 11 0.034381TRAVEL-MILEAGE-PARKIHG B*asasss8asasss3Bt.sssssss3srrrs=3a3sas3rrs333r===rr=s=rrsrr=sss=ssssaB3sr333=aaa»0 0 0 0 0 0 0.004393SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT 90 100 14 103 103 103 3 0.03*****TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 90 100 14 103 103 103 3 0.03totalAMOUNTS THIS DIVISION BBBSSSSBB8S8S3Sa8SB8SaS3SrS3 333=rrrr U333S3S3r33S3SSSSSSSSS8SSSBr8SS8SSB8S8SSSSSSa71494746803543077198771987719825180.03 CITY OF ORONO01 GENERAt FUND PROG 069 DIV 15 FINANCE Page 8DOLLAR 4100 SALARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 1991 ACTUAL 96980 1992 Y-T-D BUDGET 5-31-92 98750 40291 1993 DEPT REQUEST > . mm mm mm 101710 1993 1993 MGR REC0W10 A0P01E0 xzsxrxxxsrr'xrrxxsr 101710 101710 INCREASE (DECREASE) FROM PRIOR YR ^ mm mm ^ ^ mm ^ w mm ^ ^ > mm mm m m- ^m ^ mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm 2960 UCREASE (DECREASE) mm mm mm mm mm tm mm mm ^ ^m mm «» ^m ^ » •• mm mm 0.03 4111 OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 0 0 C 0 0 0 0.00 4141 PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION 43h9 4420 1816 4560 4560 4560 140 0,03 4142 flCA/MDCR-CITY CC^TRIBUTION 7658 7560 3142 7780 7780 7780 220 0.03 4151 HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE 6984 7350 3295 824C 8240 8240 890 0.12 4152 LIFE INSURANCE 306 310 141 385 385 385 75 0.24 4153 WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE 435 540 403 523 523 523 ‘ i7 -0.03 ••••TOTAL PF *SONAL SERVICES 116712 118930 49060 123198 123^98 123198 4268 0.04 REKARKS : = s = = r = = rr = = r.'rvrs = = % 4210 4240 4300 4306 ~s>=ssss3ssssssssss9ixssrrsss3ssss3scssss3sss5s3ssssxsrssssrsitsr.ersssssssm!8ssas Offjcr sTP'-UES BOOKS t PERIODICALS tOIAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIRS AUDITING & FINANCIAL OTHER CONSULTING TOIAL PROFESSIOMA'. «'.‘TVICE, 753 1100 365 1100 1100 1100 0 0.00 101 250 27 250 250 250 0 0.00 854 1350 392 1350 135'1350 0 0.00 3*SSSSSS *33333333 33333X333333S3S333333SS3SSSSSXS3SSrSSSSSa3SSSSSSSSSSSSS83S3S3S3 4044 3800 3914 3914 3914 114 0.03 0.00 4094 3800 0 3914 3914 3914 114 0.03 33S3S8S3.3383SSSS3SS3SSS3SSSSS3SS3SS3SSSXSS3SSSSSSSSS3SSSSSS8SSS33SSXSSSSSS3SS33 4320 TELEPHONE 469 550 161 550 550 550 n 0.00 4321 POSTAGE 1088 1000 526 1030 1030 1030 30 0.03 A883 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 1557 1550 687 1580 1580 1580 30 0.02 4322 4323 PRINTING i PUBLISHING ADVERTISING TOTAL PR:NTINC-PU8LI$H-A0 3S3..VSSZ3X33XSSS33SS8SS333SSasSS3SZ3SS383S3S3SSS3SS3SSr.S3SSSSS3SBSSrSS33S333SSSXX 609 600 58 600 600 600 0 0.00 0.00 864 600 58 60C 600 600 0 O.OC a3333333833SS3SS8983S3S8333333333333333333333arSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSKZSSSSSSSSSS^CrvaZ 4340 MAIN? OFFICE EUUIr'MENT 1311 1000 249 1030 1030 1030 30 0.03 *33*TOTAL CCmTRACT MAIN-REPAIR 1311 1000 249 1C30 1030 1030 30 0.03 01 GENERAL rUNO PROG 069 DIV 15 FINANCE 3833833888388388338888838838333883833383883X33333333333383338338883; 833883333838 Paqe 8 4352 4353 4354 4355 4356 4370 4380 4381 4393 4399 •••* LOGIS-APPLICATIONS COURIER-DATA PROCESSING LOGIS-CLASS 2 ASSESSMENT DATA PROC/OISC SPACE TOTAL DATA PROCESSING MEET INGS-CONE-SCHOOLS TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE GENbRAL LIABILITY INSURNACE 1991 1992ACTUALS39*8 = SSSS =DOLLAR1993 1993 1993 INCREASE XREQUEST REC^ ADPOTED FROm''pRIm\r (DECREASE)=*»**a= = *«s»s======ss= = s = = =:3---s-5.--- --- - -- - -- - - -^Esssszasscsszssra: 4200 0.41 0,00 0.04 -0,69 -0.03 9 w 9 ««^ • a 0.02 Page 9REMARKS 9493 10250 3418 14450 14450 14450 84 30 23 30 30 30 2897 5200 5200 ■j400 5400 5400 7326 7400 2892 2330 2330 2330 19800 22880 11533 22210 222)0 22210 aa-a3a-_r»=rssssaeaasssr33sssrssssaaa*aas=rs==rssr=srsxrssssrss2=2:s=s=s=--sgs--- 629 900 2A8 920 920 920 0 200 •5070 -670 20 629 900 248 920 920 920 20 0.02 aaaearraaa3asBaaraaa3rs333rr3rr3=333srr3===r======3rssa3rs3rr=sssraaaaaaaaar33331130 1190 1300 1300 1300 110 0.09 4373 EQUIPt€NT FLOATERS INSURANCE 80 0 0 0 0 0.00 4374 AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE 20 20 20 20 20 0 0.00 4375 BONOS INSURANCE 1144 1130 1290 1290 1290 110 0.09 4376 MONEYS & SECURITY 41 50 50 50 50 0 0.00 4377 UMBRELLA LIABILITY INSURANCE 1520 1520 1670 1670 1670 150 0.10 4379 INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD 1. 85 90 100 100 100 10 0.11 TOTAL INSURANCES '4020 4050 0 4430 4430 4430 380 0.09 MEMB«''»SHIPS TRAVEL-HILEACE-PARKIMG SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT OTHER CHARGES TOTAL OTHER CHARGES ******aaazaaaaBaa8aar 3s 3 33 rs^sssssa*xsszszaeaaass: 15 100 15 100 100 100 0 0.00 886 900 244 920 920 920 20 0.02 247 350 95 360 360 360 10 0.03 17 70 70 70 70 0 0.00 1165 1420 354 1450 1450 1450 30 0.02 TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION aaaaaBa«m = aEs3saea«Baa„a.aaas»aaa=..».s»»»»3*»«.B.,Es,«„„„-ssa*5j,„_*....._gg 151006 156480 62609 160682 160<VI2 160682 4202 0.03 aaaaaaaa aaasazaa assrs-rm aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa azaaazaa aaaaasasaaa avaaaassaa 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 069 01V 15 FINANCE Paqe 9 CITY OF ORONO 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 060 OlV 16 LEGAL Page 10DOLLAR 1993 1993 1993 INCREASE X 1991 .W2 Y-T-D DEPT NCR (DECRESE) INCREASE ACTUAI BUDGET 5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE) rss2ar».S3ssr=s=srsacssrr=r=r=rsasss=s===smssr=rr-;s*srs=T=r=rsrsrrr=====s==srrrrrrsssss: REMARKS ::=?srsss8ss£3s3s8a A301 LEGAL-RETAINER 13090 14500 3383 14935 16000 16000 1500 0.10 A302 LEGAL-PROSECUTIONS 83007 30000 15849 31200 31200 31200 1200 0.04 4303 LEGAL-CONSULTING SERVICES 19464 22500 3314 23175 19000 19000 •3500 •0.16 4306 OTHER CONSULTING 887 0 0 0 0 0 0.30 «*•«TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 116448 67000 22546 69310 66200 99999 9 9 66200 9999999999S •800 ^9999999999999 •0.01 9999999* 9^ 4358 JAIL CHARGES 9 S ^ A ^ s s s s 21133 40000 4295 40000 20000 20000 •20000 A 9 B 9 9 9 9 A3 -0.50 TOTAL OTHL? CONTRACT SERVICE 21133 40000 4295 40000 20000 20000 -20000 -0.50 ■■ssasB8««!ftSssssea*s8sss£S88ss8s^s3reasssssssrsszsssss8sssssssssssss3t:smscscssss TOTAL ANOUNTS THIS DIVISION 137581 107000 26841 109310 86200 86200 -20800 SSS38S88 88888888 8S8SSS88 88S83S8S 88888888 S88U888S 88^888888888 •0.19 188888; Q1 CEfItRAL FUND PROG 080 DIV 16 LEGAL Paqe 10 f^lTY OF ORONO01 GENERAL FUND DIV 17 GOVERNEHI BUILDING Paqe 11AlOO41204141 4142 •«*# 4210 4231 4323 42^2 •••* 4305 •••• 4321 •••• 4324 4332 •••• 4342 4343 4349 •••• 4370 4371 4J72 SALARIES'REGULAR enployees SALARIES-TEMP enployees PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION fica/nocr-city contribution total personal services office supplies BLOG a grounds MU SUPPLY EOUIPMENT parts a acces MISC NAINT SUPPLIES total SUPPLIES-NAINT'REPAIR engineering CONSULTING TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERV POSTAGE total COMMUNICATIONS utilities total utilities OFFICE OR building RENTAL total rentals MAINT NISC EOUIPMENT HA!NT BLOCS A GROUNDS janitorial SERVICE total contract MAIHT-REPAIR GENERAL LIABILITY INSUR property insurance boiler a machinery INSWIANCE TOTAL INSURANCES 01 general fund DIV 17 COVERMENI BUILDING 1991 1992ACTUAL•aasssssssra y-t-o 1993DEPT 1993MGR 1993 DOLLARINCREASEww'Eo r«S““S’m>, ,05.0 j,,,- -----------10713 XINCREASE YR (DECREASE)96 0 0 0 458 470 100 480 480 480 266 810 82U 820 11143 11860 2215 - -■=®**»«»=r*»»*aa*aa 19 12013 12013 12013 -==aaaaa88aaaaraara8Taaa 0 0 0 1591 1500 406 1545 1545 1545 144 150 24 155 155 155 100 0 0 3S3iaBB««aa,aaass=i3s;8a-a 1650 449 1700 50 0 0 •••••-. __ _ _ _ ^ 1700 1700 sssraaBsascsasssasaassxs 0 0 50 Ess.ssr: ^ m m m m '1 0 0 SS«SSassssss«SB33s 5397 10000 0 ;z: 46 46 0 10 10 153 IS1 0 45 5 0 * • • • so 0 0 0.01 0,00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03 REMARKSSSSSZSSSSSBSSBSSa 0.00 - - - - -- - - - -0.M ’ » "0.00 0 0 0 inr*"“****”'*®**”*®*=®*=®»»»3851 26500 26500 26500 26500 2650026500 26500 0 0 0 0 __ 0 0.00 *--®®®®aa»*»B*arr*ss«raae» 16500 1.65 120 0 120 ■*****a**aaaa«*'»B« 216 16500 1.65 **•■"*•• i*a2 = ==saaa.s*« •120 -1.00 0 0 ®*==*=«saa«aaeaaaraaaa« 500 337 9263 1825 • ••mm 11304 5000 7500 13000 1740 2525 515 5150 7725 '' 0 -120 -1 M 515 515 lii o_p3 5150 7725 4602 13390 13590 2318 5150 7725 13390 1509 231 • • m m m 1740 1580 240 1820 0 r ” 6 0.00 2318 7490 247 7737 7490 247 7737 7490 247 7737 15 150 225 390 cai 0 5910 7 0.0? 0.03 0.03 3.74 #4371 NEU BLOGS 1V93 0.03 CC/ADMIN 2770 j;;;............446o Bsaaaa.a,,,,J-25 iaaaaasaaar=aaaa Pacje 11 liMMNM Page 121991 1992ACTUAL BUDGET 1993DEPT 1993MGR 1993 DOLLARINCREASE(DECREASE)XINCREASEY-T-D5-31-92 RE0i€ST RECOMMD ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE)REMARKS A533 SPECIAL ASMNTS ON LAND 3080 308U 3080 3080 3080 0 0.00 ff8 of 15 CB SEWER TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 3080 3080 0 3080 3080 3080 0 0.00 aaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaraaaaaarraBrrrrraarrraaaxaasasaarsrraarrrrr:;xrxxaxxxx 4656 INT ON SPEC ASNNTS 2830 2550 2270 2270 2270 •280 •0.11 «8 of 15 CB SEWER •a**TOTAL OTHER DISBURSEMENTS 2830 2550 0 2270 2270 2270 -280 •0.11 aas-essarsaaBaaaaaeaarsraaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaarraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarxaaaBrsraBarsaa 10IAL AH0UN1S THIS DIVISION 40379 44080 13481 66690 66690 66690 22610 0.51 taaaaaaa Baaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaxasa aazaaaaa aaazBaaa aaasaaaazaa errsrssraa 01 GCNERAL FUND OiV 17 GCVERMENT BUILDING Page 12 i V V >:| ♦I CITY OF ORONO01 GENERAL FUND PROG 100 OIV 21 HUNAN SERVICES Page 1343DS••••HUHtN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL OTHER CHARGES TOTAL AraUNTS THIS DIVISION nOUAR1993 1993 1993 INCREASE X1991 1992 Y-T-D DEPT MGR (DECREASE) INCREASEACTUAL BUDGET 5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE) REMARKSaaaa«asssass*xa*B*asBrssse*«:arrsrs = = s = r = = ssrsrs = = sasscsrssrez«*asaass=sasss*assseassssa«'a«*asssasci 13760 H210 7427 14670 14670 14670 460 0.03 laaaa13760 14210 7427 14670 14670 14670 460 0.03 3*-sssaarraraaaaaaaxaaaaaaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarraaarraaaa 13763 14210 7427 14670 14670 14670 460 aeaaaaaa aaaraarr ======== ar====== araaaraa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa 0.03 aaaaai 92 93 aa ea U. HENN HUNAN SERVICE PLANNING BOARD 1600 1600 SENIOR COrWUNITY SERVICES 5o.*;o 5225 UESTONKA SENIOR CENTER 4450 4630 LL-O-N AREA SENIOR CENTER 2080 2165 U. HENN PIONEER ASSN 500 500 W. SUBURAN MEDIATION CENTER 500 500 LEACt€ OF NN WJHAN RIGHTS 50 50 14210 14670 01 GENERAL FUND PRQQ 100 OIV 21 HUMAN SERVICES Page 13 4100 SLALRIES-REGULAR EHPLOYEE 617897 624370 245440 657150 657150 657150 32780 C.054111OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 34754 16000 13883 16000 16000 16000 0 0.004115SAIARIES-PART TIME EHP 0 15090 18000 ’bUOO 18000 2910 0.194120SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES 4579 5850 21 tJ 5850 ;850 5850 0 0.004132HOLIDAY PAY-LELS 15691 18850 21960 : I960 21960 3110 0.164136OTHER PAY 4000 4120 4120 4120 120 0.034141PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION 75693 78540 30716 82990 82990 82990 4450 0.064142nCA/MOCR-CITY CONTIBUTION 5674 6310 3073 6950 6950 6950 640 0.10 4151 HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE 38049 48910 19047 50380 50380 50380 1470 0.03 4152 LIFE INSURANCE 3009 3150 1361 3245 3245 3245 95 0.03 4153 WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE 30131 34800 26881 36180 36180 36180 1380 0.04 4154 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0 0.00 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 825477 855870 342968 902825 902825 ^ 9 «« 7000 902825 46955 0.05 4210 OFFICE SUPPLIES . MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 7017 7000 2867 7000 7000 0 0.00 4220 24566 26000 8938 28000 28000 28000 0 0.00 4221 CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIP 8538 10000 3222 9000 8000 8000 -20C0 -0.20 4231 BLDG 1 GROUNDS M&R SUPPLY 1496 1000 120 1000 500 500 1V/1oo-0.50 4232 EQUIPMENT PARTS 1 ACCES 5442 jOOO 825 5000 5000 5000 0 0.00 4240 BOOKS A PERIODICALS 1357 1200 521 1200 1200 1200 0 0.00 4241 TRAINING SUPPLIES 1612 3800 301 2000 2000 2000 -1800 -0.47 4242 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES 20 0 0 0 0 0.00 4243 DARE PROGRAM 1256 1800 1605 1800 1800 1800 0 0.00 4244 K-9 DOG PROGRAM 679 1800 105 1800 1800 1800 0 0.00 ••••TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIR 51983 59600 18502 56800 55300 55300 -4300 -0.07 r Page 15Page 14RWRKS i (a D 0 !0 (0 OO 00 47 .00 .00 1.00 KOf ICSM Page 14 DOLLAR1993 1993 1993 INCREASE1991 1992 Y-T-0 DEPT MGR (DECREASE)ACTUAL BUDGET S-31-92 REQUEST RECOMHD ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR REMARKSS3asszs3ssssssssssssrssssssszsssss5sss = rs:sss=ssssrsssssssssrss3ssssrr .'sssssszszssrsserzszszszzssssssszzsrsXINCREASE0EC.^FASE4303LEGAL-CCMSULTINC SERVICES 1012 1500 896 1500 1000 1000 -500 -0.334306OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES 19254 7000 5443 8200 7000 7000 0 0.00****TOTAL TROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20266 8500 6339 9700 8000 8000 -500 -0.064320TELEPHONE740875003465 7700 7700 7700 200 0.034321POSTAGE1965210070921002100210000.00•*a«4322 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING & PUBLISHING 9373 9600srrssrrrrrzrssssrrsr3910 4500 4174£££££££1088 9800 9800 9800££££££S£££££££t£££r£££=££££££££=4500 4500 4500 200£££££££££££0 0.02mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mmmm ^m m • mm mm mm ^m- * mm0.004323ADVERTISING890271001001001000.004324TOTAL PRINTING-PUBLISH-AO UTILITIES 3999 4500S8ss3ssssszszz=rz=rr3212 3400 1115■» mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm mm ^ mm ^ mm1014 4600 4600 4600££££SS£££££££3S£££££££SSS£SS££££5500 5500 5500 100£££SS£r: ££££2100 0.02 «• w w mm mm ^ mm0.62**** 4330 TOTAL UTILITIES RADIO RENTAL 3212 3400 1014 5500 5500 5500 2100 0.62 3SSSrSSSSSSSrSSSSSSSSSS8SSSrSSZSSSSSSSrS33SSrS3SS=SS3rSS33SSSS=SSSSSS3SSSSS3SSSS 15885 17000 19000 TT500 17500 500 0.03 4331 EQU.PHENT & MAC RENTAL 190 0 0 0 0 0.00 4332 OFFICE OR BLDG RENTAL 10138 11400 2534 0 0 0 -11400 -1.00 **•* 4340 TOTAL RENTALS f. MAINT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 26213 28400 2534 r=3333rsa3=3sssrsr3=rzrsr== 3420 3600 2261 19000 £££=£££SSC£ 3600 17500 3600 17500 ^ m» mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm ^ ^ 3600 -10900 w... ' ^m m mm ^ mm -mt -•» ^ » m. mm m c -0.38 ;££££££££££ 0.00 4341 TiAINT AUTO EQUIPMENT 17581 14000 7672 18000 18000 18000 4000 0.29 4342 MAINT MISC EQUIPMENT 1650 1500 961 1500 1500 1500 0 0.00 4343 MAINT BLDGS k GROUNDS 2972 1500 594 1600 500 500 -1000 -0.67 4349 JANITORIAL SERVICE 2565 3500 1000 5000 600U 6000 2500 0.71 *•**TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR 28188 24100 12488 29700 29600 mm ^ mm mm mm 29600 5500 0.23 4352 LOGIA-APPLICATIONS 5503 5950 2131 6950 6950 6950 1000 0.17 4354 LOGIS-CLASS 2 ASSESSMENT 3647 3870 3870 4040 4040 4040 170 0.04 4355 DATA PROC/DISC SP mCE 10962 13200 4033 11620 11620 116c.-1580 -0.12 **** 4356 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING ME G T1NGS•CON F•SCHOOL S 20112 23020 10034 22610 22610 22610 *410 -0.02 CS = r 3 = 3S3SS3Z3SSSS33S££=:£ = 333ZS'^SBSr r 33 = r zszr =3sr S3SSZSSSaS9SCCSSS9CZSS3SSXSZS3S 6963 15000 4345 12000 11000 11000 -4000 -0.27 ••••TO"AL OTHER CONTRACT-SERVICE 6963 15000 4345 12000 11000 11000 -4(K)0 -0.27 ascassaarissaaassasBsscsasaassaasssaxsaxssssssaae.^sssasaaaaasaasxsassasxsssBxaxxa 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 129 OlV 31 POLICE PROTECTION Page 15 // \ \ r 103639 104570 53375 10T707 106192 106192 1622 0.021250024720296501808018080•6640 •0.27609475935029675 61131 61131 61131 1781 0.036491682016717 25 7025 7025 205 0.03183577 195460isssssssssssassss:0 50 84721mm ^ M «M 205513 192428 192428 -3032 -0.D2rsrrzrrarrarsarsasssrrrrsaaasrsssaararasssrarsrassaaa50 250 250 200 4.000500502502502004.00 Page 17tSE^SE) REMARKS9.02 3.273.03 3.031.02na>aLOO< • m m mkOOtXSSJB1.01tVSSft Page 17 CITY OF ORONO01 GENERAL FUND PROG 174 DIV 33 PUNNING AND ZONING Pago 181991ACTUAL1992BUDGETY-I-D DOLLAR1993 1993 1993 INCREASE XDEPT HGR (DECREASE) INCREASE5-31-92 fTUEST RECOMHD ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE)REMARKSs——cssssssssssssssrssr. - s~s3s: = rr = rrs5:r = = r2:r=2rrrr = r“r=sr = s = = = r:rrY;2rrr = zs = s = r ssssassssesr=4100 SAIARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 203619 213100 83597 222140 222140 222140 9040 0.044111OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 143 400 34 200 200 200 -200 -0.504120SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES 46 0 0 0 0 0 0.004141PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION 9158 9570 3747 9950 9950 9950 380 0.044142FICA/f*DCR-CITY CONTRIBUTION 13306 16330 5266 17000 17000 17000 670 0.044151HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE 11258 12150 5918 13920 13920 13920 1770 0.154152LIFE INSURANCE 82 80 35 85 85 85 5 0.064153WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE 5517 6690 2846 3700 3700 3700 -2990 -0.454210TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 243129 258320 101443 266995 266995 2669958S=££SSSS = ‘SSS = S:£ = & = = = = = ::z:S£ = = S3S8SS£.S = = = =:S = T3r = Sr = = S££S3138 7300 1000 5000 4000 4000 8675^ M mm mm mm mm-3300 0.03mm mm mm mm mm mm ^-0.454220MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 802 1290 334 700 700 700 -590 -0.46 4221 CLOTHING & PERSCHIAL EQUIP 250 250 250 250 0 0.00 4232 EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCES 105 420 300 300 300 -120 -0.29 4240 BOOKS A PERIODICALS . TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN’REPAIR 576 570 35 570 570 570 0 0.00 **•«4621 9830 1369 6820 5820 5820 -4010 -0.41 rxrrr = =.•= = rrrsssasraaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaraaraaaa 4303 LEGAL-CONSULTING SERVICES 344 620 620 620 620 0 0.00 4305 ENGINEERING CONSULTING 297 320 320 320 320 0 0.00 4306 OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES 4188 8730 617 7000 4000 4000 -4730 -0.54 **** 4320 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE 4829 9670 617 7940 4940 4940 4730 -0.49 a = = a.:*:ra = s2r rasa2ss2x.ttr«ss5arsaa*<?iarsrsst5ss3rkisasrarssas*s*a*sa**asa*ssaassa»» 949 1100 324 1100 1100 1100 0 0.00 4321 POSTAGE 2637 2700 1193 2700 2700 270C 0 0.00 432? TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING A PUBLISHING 3586 3800 1517 3800 3800 38»0 0 0.00 8::s = arsasa2 = s = rTrx = rs2r'.;sar-.sr -xaaaaraaar asr r r srar rrr aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaraa 1868 1660 16- 1750 1750 1750 90 0.05 4323 ADVERTISING 1010 0 255 400 400 400 400 0.00 ••••TOTAL PRINTING'PUBLISHAO 2878 1660 417 2150 2150 2150 490 0.30 ««aaa3s*c»Sjass2«»«a*:rxasa»B» = 32EX2: = =-= 2 = = i= = 3= = = = 2r-z2s:2a2aesa«a2S22**asaa2B**a«2 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 174 DIV 33 PLANNING AND ZONING Page 18 4| m 0.00 Pago 18REMARKSiassa=»s*’ a;v -• » ■ EQUIPMENT I. MAC RENTAL TOTAL RENTALS MAINT OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINT AUTO EQUIPMENT MAINT MISC EQUIPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR LOCIS-APPLICATIONS COURIER-DATA PROCESSING DATA PROR/DISC SPACE DATA PROCESSING TOTAL DATA PROCESSING MEETINGS-CONF-SCHOOLS TOTAI OTHER CONTRACT /RVICES GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE EQUIPMENT FLOATERS INSURANCE AUTOMOTIVE INSURANCE UMBRELLA LIABILITY INSURANCE INSURAkCE AGENT OF RECORD TOTAL INSURANCES MEMBERSHIPS TRAVEL-MILEAGE-PARKING MEETING EXPENSES LICENSES t TAXES SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT TOTAL OTHER CHARGES AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION ... Page 19DOLLAR ^1995 1993 1993 INCREASE X1991 1992 Y-T-D DEPT MGR (DECREASE) INCREASEACTUAL BUDGET 5-31-92 P'wUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE) REMARKSr- ; = = === ==a======a===ss=a=Brssea=sa*s»»=a=as= ==s===== = ===>== = ====* = = === === = = ®=== = = = = ®“= = **-=®'®*®“***”*'"**0 500 500 500 500 0 0.00500500 500 500 0 0.00 : = = r = r = ===r: = = = r = =:= = = = r = = ==re-=:=3arr=rr=:=:a = 3rn====236033000984309030903090900.0328101600170110011001100-500 -0.313044703194704704700•o • • 1 O I6717 5070 1473 4660 4660 4660 -410 -0.0828893120104093779377937762572.01000000.0012201220124012401240200.0247101729620620620-4090 -0.879050398911237112371123721870.2487301732 2600 1127 2600 2200 2200 -<.00 -0.151732 2600 1127 2600 220C 22C0 -400 -0.15 -•-«---«aaaaaraa':aa8rarr8BxaaasarrraaBrsrr23sassrsssrr = = = = -=r=-cr = sr = 2arraassr=S3 1120 1220 1340 1340 15'.0 120 0.10 110 110 120 120 120 10 0.09 541 540 650 650 650 110 0.20 1520 1520 1670 1670 1670 150 0.10 158 160 165 165 165 5 0.03 3449 3550 0 3945 3945 3945 395 0.11 a,(.53,««aaaaaBaear sraaaaarra*taeaaaaa8Baaeaaasszs3 = = == = = = = **“ •s=^**s***®-**®~--'****^ 0 0.00280:2o 195 520 520 520 1679 v.oo 545 i:200 2200 2200 253 :i00 113 300 300 300 0 20 27 G 0 0 1505 1650 492 1650 1650 1650 3717 3890 1372 4670 4670 4670 assasrzarrrsaassas3taaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaarsBsaaBsso*2 28338a 307940 113324 315317 310917 310917 2977 {;.s3aaca a3aeaaa.a sxaaaasa aaasaaaa aarsasrr aasssass arsr.-sssaraaa ^.01 aasaaaaaes OY CENERAL FUM) PROG 174 DIV 33 PLANNING AW) ZONING Page 19 page 18 CITY OY MONO01 GENERAL EUNO PROG 175 OIV 54 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Pac}DOLLAR1991199319931993INCREA^.E %1992 Y-T-0 DEPT HGR (DECREASE)INCREASEACTUALBUDGET5-31-92 REQUEST RECONMO ADOPfED FR(3H PRIOR YR (DECREASE) *r sraa*2ss = s*;t*a«asitssassssssas = rx = s*ftssssssxsar s*.s»srts*sftas*s*a»ae***axasft**r*»: 4210 OFFICE supplies 0 200 200 200 200 0 0.00 4232 EQUIPMEHT PARTS 1 ACCES 108 600 600 600 600 0 0.00 lOtAL lUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIRS 198 800 0 800 830 800 0 0.00 ••••Sftvftftft •«•>•*«£sxaxaaxaxxxxxxxeaaaxxaaxxxaraxKxx'sxKxaxxaxaxxKxxxxxxxxxaxxxaxa 4305 engineering CONSULTING 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 •••ft TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 4320 • •assxexxasxaaxxft Rxxaxaaaaxaxaxaxxxaaeaaaxaaaxaaaar caxaaaaaaftiiL . rearaaaaaaraaaaa TELEPHONE 799 1100 375 1100 1100 1130 0 0.00 4321 POSTAGE 70 50 50 50 50 0 0.00 • ••ft TOTAL CONNUNICATIEMS 869 1150 375 1150 1150 1150 0 0.00 ■ •«ftftft**ftft«ftftftaaaaa38asaacxaxxa8aaraaaaaaaaaaaa.^*«aaaaaaaxaaxaBaaaxaaaaaaaftaaaaaa 43??PRINTING i P>.<8LISHING 0 200 200 200 200 0 0.00 • •• t total printing PUOllSH-AD 0 200 0 200 200 200 0 0.00 • *ftft*fti»*ftaaa*aBaaaaaaaaaaaftaaasaaac2aaaaaaaaa = = arxaa:;a-r3rr=rs r raxr aas aaaaaaaaaxa 4324 UTILITIES 124 100 97 100 100 IOC’0 0.00 total utilities f?4 100 97 100 100 100 0 0.00 axcaacaasaaxaaaaxxaaaaavaBaaxasaaaaaaaxaaaaaaxexxxBXftxaaxraaaar^aaxaaaaaaaaaxaaaa 4340 NAINT OFMLE EQUIP 200 200 2G0 200 0.00 4342 MINT HISC EQUIPMENT 574 1000 288 600 600 600 *400 U.40 itt§TOTAL CONTRACT MIN-REPAIR 574 1000 288 800 800 800 -200 -0.20 4356 MEET1KGS-CONF-SCHOOLS 140 800 800 800 800 0.00 •••ft TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERV 0 0 140 800 800 800 800 0.00 4361 TRAVIl-MILEAGE PARKING 7 0 0 0 0 0.00 •••ft TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0.00 ■■•■•ftft>■■•■>■««• aBaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaBftraaaaxaaBftaiiaaaaaa iwaftftaaaa 4380 MEM8ERSHIPS 0 100 100 100 100 0 0.00 4398 POLICE NCSERVE EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0.00 • ••ft TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 0 100 0 100 100 100 0 0.00 ft f .’'•ft^ftftfts^ftBftaaaaaftftaaaftaaaftftftaaaaaaftaaaftaaftftaaaxaftaaxaaaxxsaaaxa^^saaxraaaaaxa 4850 REFUNDS A REIMBURSCMENIV 5000 0 0 0 0 0.00 tlii)TOTAL OTHER DIS8URSEMENTS 5000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 TOtAL AHQUiTt THIt DIVISION 6675 3350 907 3950 5950 5950 600 0.18 B*aftaaft«aaxftftsaaaxaaaaaaxexaaaaa aaaxxsaxaxaxaaxftftaafta REK RKS 01 OLItm FL:H3 RROQ m ?:v 34 CNERGEICY nEPAICDNlSS Page 20 5812 8400 2072 8650 8650 8650 2506*5 655 655 655279901595000026538091250250250-130582640182490490490•150136 190 148 195 195 195 59592 9610 4088 10240 10240 10240 630 950 1100 200 1130 1130 1130 30 0.0337953850654396530003000■850 -0.22«745 4950 854 5095 4130 4130 -820 -0.17 Page 22tCMSKS Page 22 Page 2301 GENERAL FUND PROG 249 DIV h? <!Tr,£ET CONST & HAINT1991 1992 Y-T-0 DOLLAR1995 1993 1993 INCREASE XDEPT HGR (DECREASE) INCREASEACTUAL BUDGET 5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE)ssssssJxarrssxsrsa’aassssssrrsssraassstararrrssrrrssrrtsrsrsssrrsrarsssrrrzrrsrsrsssssrsssrsrrrrrrrrssaasssssEsaREMARKSSALARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 137860 143490 64612 147795 147795 147795 4305 0.03OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 13494 8000 4676 8240 8240 8240 240 0.03SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES 387 5800 5800 5800 5800 0 0.00PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION 6815 7050 3118 6990 6990 6990 -60 -0.01nCA/MDCR-CITY CONTRIBUTION 14037 12030 6328 12020 12020 12020 -10 0.00HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE 17952 18860 9068 21240 21240 21240 2380 0.13LIFE INSURANCE 231 210 101 240 240 240 30 0.14WCMKMANS COMP INSURANCE 14613 19130 8420 12620 12620 12620 -6510 -0.34IL PERSONAL SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 205389 214570 96323 214945 214945 214945 375 0.00aaBseaaaaasaaaraaaaaaarrsrsarrrarssrraararrrsrsasassszxasssssrsraarassaxsssaasaaa801 800 117 800 800 8C0 0 0.00MOTOR FUELS A '.UBRICANTS 16295 15000 3246 15000 13000 13000 •2000 •0.13CLOTHING A PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 3630 2700 1072 2700 2700 2700 0 0.00EQUIPMENT PARTS A ACCES 14383 10000 4526 10300 10300 10300 300 0.03 STREET MAINT MAT A SUPPLY 143851 160000 17852 165000 160000 160000 0 0.00 BOOKS 1 PERIODICALS ^67 0 27 0 0 0 0.00 TOTAL SUPPUES-MAiN‘REPA!R LEGAL-CONSULTING SERVICES 179027 188500 26840 193800 18680C 186800 -1700 -0.01 sssBassaaasassBssaaasasssBaaaaasssa&aaassssaasssssaaassuraasaBSssassxasaaassxsaaB 25V 500 50 500 500 500 0 0.00 ENGINEERING CONSULTING 7068 10000 3960 10000 8000 8000 -2000 -0.20 OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES 393 0 0 0 3 O.Cu TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICtS TELEPHONE 7720 10500 4010 10500 8500 8500 -2000 -0.19 sasTxsssssr zsssxsxzrxssxxr zsss = zsssisssa3zs3xs8s8as3aassa88s3ss88s,a8as3r8ars3ss8aa U94 1200 646 1200 1200 1200 0 0.00 POSTAGE 214 200 78 200 200 200 0 0.00 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING i PUBLISHING 1708 33S*tX7S3S; l15 1400 724 1400 1400 1400 0 0.00 rsaassasssaaasssaaaaaaaaxsssBSSsssssssssssassssasBsssssssssasrssssaasBa 500 300 300 300 0 0.00 ADVERTISING 380 0 336 0 0 0 0 0.00 TOTAL PRINTING-PUBLISHING-AD 495 300 336 300 300 300 0 0.00 s8 3 3srssssaszarc8a«8saas8saaBxsa(»aassess8aszassaB88B8a8Basssasssasaassaas8Ssxsass 01 GENERAL FUND PROG 249 DIV 42 STREET CONS1 A MAINT Page 23 m •lai •mn\ fiVrT; ■ImHi■iHV7TKMs1KSSIjBHQjHHR Paqe 26RCMMKS>» «••at5• msraa0M20 10 03 n tAMM tr .00 .00 r«*«« I.Ql Page 26 CITY OF ORONO01 GENERAL FUND PROG ?95 0*Y 65 RECYCLING PldCU*^ PROGRAH1991 J992 Y-T-DSALARIES*REGULAR EMPLOYEE OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEF PERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION FICA/MDCR-CITY CONTRIBUTION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCES TOTAL SI^PLIES-MAIN-REPAIR ^EGAL-CONSULTING SERVICES 01HER CONSUlflNG SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE POSTAGETOTAL COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING A PUBLISHING TOTAL PRlNTING-PUBLISHING-^0 MAINT OFFICE lOUIPMENT spring -fall -xmas clean up TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REPAIR DATA PROCESSING TOTAL DATA PROCESSING KEETINGS-CONF-SCHOOLS TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE TRAVEL-MILEAGE-PARKING CONTRACT RECYCLING PICXl^ SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT TOTAL OIHER CHARGES Page 27DOLLAR1993 1993 1993 INCREASE XDEPi MGR (DECREASE) INCREASEACTUAL BUDGET 5-31-92 REQUEST ilECOMMD ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE) REMARKSr = = -rrr = r = r=r=r = r = 2r = r = rrr2S5r = 3rrrsss2 - rrsrrrrsr5s5ss2s = 3 3ss3rsara**ass5ssss*s*=ass3ssss«asx:asss»sa*aar**aa531200000.00566510002500150015005000.50492 50 225 225 225 175 3.506403803803803003.751230911500 3105 2105 2105 975 0.860XBsrsrs8sassss = 3.s8SSSSSSSS3Ssssrs3Ssssss::sss3;rsssszss3ssarsssssssssssz irssrssss171 100 51 200 200 200 100 1.00350ISO3503500.005505505504504.50523 100 51BaS9aaSS3SSeB383SSS:tSSS3SSS3SSS3SSSS3S3SSBS3SSSSS3S3SSSSSSSSSSS3SSS3S3333S3S3SS30 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.00SSS3SfiSB3r3aS3S333SaSSS3rSXSS3333333333333333333333333S33333333333333333333333S3213425006942500250025002154250069425002500250026285G0315008008003000.602628500315008008003000.60333333333X333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333338333X333333833333 0.001972002002002000 197 200 0 200 200 200 0 0.00 3 33 3333 3 3 3 3 3 S 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 S X 3 3 XX3 3 S 3 3 3 3 3 3 X 3 X 3 3 3 3 3 3 XX SS33 X S3333333333333333333333S3 52 0 0 0 0 0.00 18891 20000 1135 21000 21000 21000 1000 0.05 18943 20000 1135 21000 21000 21000 1000 0.05 333333333333SXSSSX3SS338SSSS3SSSXXS3X33SSXXXS3S33S8SSXSSS333S3333838333338333333 120 130 HO UO UO 10 0.08 120 130 0 HO HO HO 10 0.08 33833XSSSaSS88SXS3S3X'3SSaS3S8S3XSS33SSSSSSSSSXSXSSSXXXS333333r3XXS3Sr333SSXS833« 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 «SS88SSSaaSBS3832!*38a33SS333CSS8SSSS33X3S3SaSS3SSSSS3S8333333388833383333X333X33 1 0.053230313131 42555 42600 21060 6400G 64000 64000 274 130 134 154 134 42861 42760 21060 64165 64165 64165 2H05 0.50 ■383X338838888X38*33388338888S333388833383388X33X88383=3338383883383338833X88383 79715 67320 22943 93160 9H60 9H60 24 HO 0.36 ■8888838 83888883 33838838 83X88833 83833333 3XS8X8SS X83383rZX388 01 GEIIEWU. FW© PtOO 295 OIV 65 WLCVCLIMG PICKUP PROCSAM TOtAl AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION XZ3SSX833a Page 27 _ 136 0 0 0 0 0.0061188040756828175007500•540 -0.0766996066989989989290.03 POLICE SPEC SERVICE6787900095892708A898489-511 -0.06 CITY OF (MONO01 GENERAL FUND OIV 72 SPECIAL PROJECTS-CONTIHG Page 29 4100 4154 4210 •••• 4305 4306 •••• 4321 4322 4354 4355 •••• SALARIES*REGULAR EMPLOYEE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OFFICF SUPPLIES TOTAL ‘••'■'UIES-MAIN-REPAIR ENGINEERING CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE POSTAGE TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING 4 PUBLISHING TOTAL PRINTING 4 PUBLISHING LOGIS-CLASS 2 ASSESSMENT DATA PROCESSING TOTAL DATA PROCESSING OTHER CHARGES TOTAL OTHER CHARGES SPECIAL ASMNTS ON LAND TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY OPERATING TRANSFER OUT TOTAL TRANSFERS SPECIAL PROJECTS-CONTING total other DISBURSEMENTS TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISION total AMOUNTS THIS Ff<® 4ivV • ••• 4533 4710 4900 1991 ACTUAL 1992 BUDGET Y-T-D DOLLAR1993 1993 199: INCREASEdept mgr (DECREASE) 5-31-92 REQUEST RECOHMO ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR sssssssarssssrsrszssarsssssssssssssnsssss.'ssrs 5150 XINCREASE (DECREASE)REMARKS 5000 5150 = = = = = = r = = = = z = r r = ss = = s2 = ss3Esssssssssrssss 3SSSSS8 5150 150 0.03 0 0 0 0 0.00 176 5000 0 5150 5150 5150 150 0.03 XBxrXBaaBxrrrBaxxaxaarBBBsrxBarrrBaaxarxxaaaa rrXXarzszr xxi xxxxxxx3s.aaara3axBaxaa 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 = = = = = = = = = = ® = 2r3aBXBaa8axxrrzxa8rrxxraaaarBj:BaB:srx.B88aazxa8xaaxaaaaaa63800000.00 34604 17000 2618 17500 17500 17500 500 0.03 35242 17000 2618 17500 17500 17500 500 0.030.03 HWY 12 COOOT STUDY «a»aasss=asae»a»srr = 3sssrr3ss3raassatt»csassc»sssssss3oaaaaa»asaaBsasrBaraaa««3«a:NAVARRE REDEVELOPI^NT6820000os 682 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 i STORM WATER MANAGEFKNT 0.00 SHORELANO REGULATIONS 2rssaaa;ri8saaarssrss3aassaanaaa*aaaes=s*sasaarraaaza»«asassaszsaasaassrass=rsaaesp£RSOHJ|EL RECRUITMENT 44 0 0 0 C 0.00 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0.00 aaaBaaaaaaaaaaaarraaaaaarrraarraaaazsrrarerzzzrrsrzazrrrrrcaaaaaxaarararrar.aaaaa 1992 1993 eaaaaaa aaaaaaa 10000 0 2000 2000 3000 0 600 0 0 0 •600 •2840 -1,00 -1.002640000 17000 17500 0 3440 0 0 0 0 -3440 -1.00 taaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarxazaeaaaaaaaaraaraassaszz zzaaaxaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaa 206 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 MINNETONKA ART CENTER 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 aaaaesraaaaBasarrraaaaaaarrzrssxaarBBraararraraaaaaraxaar BaxaaasaBsaaBBaaasaasaa19801650173417341734-116 -0.06 WCXDHILL AVENUE f 4 i 5 1980 1850 0 1734 1H4 1734 -116 -0.06 *******® *********s*******s!a88Br aaBraaaaBx asaasaBaaaaaaBaaaBaaaaaaaaaaBaaaaaa 60750 62800 64900 64900 64900 2100 0.03 •* 60750 62800 0 64900 64900 64900 2100 0.03 TRANSFER TO FUND 24 aBxaBxxBaxaaaBXBxaxxxxxxxxBaxxraxxxxxxxzrxxaxrrrzsxxsraxaaaaxaaaraaaxaaaaaaaxxaaTRANSFFR TO Fllltfl 1952 5160 1986 1720C 64008 64008 58848 11.40 I'^a 5160 1986 17200 64008 64008 58848 11.40 BaxxxxaxxaxsrBsxarxBaxxaxarxBaaaaaaxxBxaxaaBBXBaBBBBXEsaaaaaxaxxxxBaaaBaaxaBaaBB 101188 95250 4648 106484 153292 153292 58042 0.61 oaaaaxxaaxxazaxaaaBxaBBaaxxrsxaxxxrr2s*xxrxsas83szsaxxBxa*B8BaaaEaaaaaBBaaBaaxaa 2905633 3024890 107640> 3163715 3132572 3132572 107682 0.04 saaaaaaa xxxxxaaa aaBsxsax Bsxaaxax arasrsax rrxsxxxa xxrrrrxxazxa axsxrxaass 1W2 1993 aaeaaaaa aaaaazaa 0 62800 0 64900 62800 64900 aaaaaaaa Maaamni 01 eiNtRAL FLTO OIV 72 SPECIAL PRCJECTS-CONTIHG Page 29 ICITY OF ORONO 12 PARK FUND DIV 00 Paqe 30 1991 1992 1993 Y-T-D i/EPT 4305 ENGINEERING CONSULTING TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OTHER t»>ROVEMENTS SPECIAL ASMNTS ON LAND OTHER EQUIPT^NT TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL ANOUNTS THIS DIVISION TOTAL AMOIMTS THIS FUND DOLLAR1993 1993 INCREASE MGR (DECREASE) ACTUAL BUDGET S-31-92 REQUEST RECOMNO ADOPTED FROM PRIOT YR (DECREASE) REMARKS c<«szasssszc>3*9aBS«ss9szsa9zsxssss:sxE = aEa 0 X INCREASE 4530 4533 4560 •••• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ur*9999X399939993999999ZSEEEEZB9SE£EEEEEEESrrEEZESSE3ESSS9993B99t9S1 6100 *6110 (1.00) 1065C 0 0 PARK FUND PROJECTS ■■aasasskssssasssss (390) HACKBERRY PARK­ DRINKING FOUNTAIN 0 6100 10650 000 -6100 (1.00) ■■ssaaassaaaasaaaxeasasaaxaassasaasssssssssssasssssaasassaaacaaassrSBSSSSSSSSS8S 0 6100 10650 000 -6100 (1.00) **>saasa aaaaaaas aaaaaaaa aaaazaaa aaaaaaas rasaaaass^iaaaaazcaaasaaaaaaaaaaass 0 6100 10650 000 -6100 (1.00) ^*s**saa aaaaBBaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaas asaaaaas SBaasasaaaaa assssaasaa 5000 (394)NAVARRE PLAYGROUND/PARK STREET LIGHTS FENCING (3«9)LYDIARO BEACH GATE SIGNS 500 150 (387) (390) (396) CASCO POINT ROAD SIGNS SAWiy BEACH SIGNS 150 150 SIMUT PARK BEACH SIGNS 150 6100 12 PARK FUn> DIV 00 Paqe 30 cnr OF oRodio Page 31 4530 4540 4550 4560 • ••• OTHER IHPROVEHENTS OFFICE FURN-FIKT-EQUIP AUTOHOTIVE EQUIPMENT OTHER EQUIPMENT TOTAL CAPTIAL OUTLAY TOTAL AFWUHTS THIS FUND OlV 00 1991 1992 Y-I-DACTUALBUDGET5-31-92 'sssaassssssraass “ = = = sasai 0 17650 402 13950 5220 50700 42080 38872 40200 23896 44494 Bssssarss -ssassasssasssssas 44494 122500 65976 1993 DEPT 1993 MGR DOLLAR 1993 INCREASE (DECREASE) 3120 3120 3120 -17650 -10830 -50700 X INCREASE (1.00) (0.78) (1.00) remarks 3120 :2 = rr: 3120 3120 :srss: 3120 3120 :s«ss: 3120 -119380 -119380 #4540 (626) AOMIN ■ (4) COMPUTERS (REPLACE) (1) LASER PRINTER (REPLACE 3) <632; 842 (1) LIGHT BOARD (1) MICROFICHE reader /printer (0.97) Tssrssssa (1.63) ff = r = ss.sa 8800 (PURCHASE 1992) 1800 (PURCHASE 1992) 250 2870 U IMPtOyiMLNT 4 EQUiniENT OUUAT FUND DIV Pago 3l [I iW;IiIi iiViim I 4100 SALARIEDTOTAl P?4210 OFFICE 1TOTAl SI4303LEGAl-Ci430SENGINEEi4306OTHER 0• ***TOTAL P4321POSTAGETOTAL C 4322 PRINTIN 4323 ADVERT1 •*##TOTAl P 4340 MAINT C #•#*TOTAl C 4363 llCENSi 43«SPEC E( 4399 OTHER 1 4710 TRANSFI 4530 STREET 4532 STREET ••••TOTAL 4531 SWR/WT TOTAl Page 34CITY OF ORONO24 PERM INPROV REVOLVING FUND OIV 00SALARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUr?LlES TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIH-REPAIR LEGAL-CONSULTING SERVICES ENGINEERING CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POSTAGE TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING I PUBLISHING ADVERTISING TOTAL PRINTING t PUBLISHING 4340 MAINT OFFICE EQUIPMENT •«*»TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN-REP 4383 LICENSES 4 TAXES 4393 SPEC EQUIP REPLACEMENT 4399 OTHER CHARGES 4710 TRANSFER TO GEN FUND 4530 STREET LIGHTING PROJ 4532 STREET C(»STROCTION .*«•TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 4531 SUR/WTR UTIIIT» CONSTR «Mi!TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1991ACTUAL REMARKSDOLLAR1993 1993 1993 INCREASE X1992 Y-T-0 DEPT MGR (DECREASE) INCREASEBUDGET 5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED FROM PRIOR TR (DECREASE)Q 0 0.00. . .c. . . .0. . . .0. . . .0 0 0 0 0.00^9 0 0.00. .]'<). . . .0. . . .0. . . .0 0 0 0 0.00_ __ _-:;=--3-=rr====r======2===33====»s=2========0 0.00123217717680274515850000389350000500005000022961500006344500005000050000a=s33==aa = cs===aaaac = 3s===a== = =:s = a3 = = =- = = = = = = = = = = = = = =- - -=— - - - -- 105 43 0. . . . . 105 0 43 0 0 0 0 0.00 B-aa-s-a;asB,saa*arascsas3saassaaaL2Sss:sss=s«s = = = = = = === = 2====*==*==*®****===®*®** Q 0 0.00 254 ssrsassssssi 16 245 0 0 0 0 0.00 is»c8s*saeaaas:sxssxB=sssr = = = = r = = = = -ss = =====”**«*“*®»®*»“** = -**0 0.00 ^^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 -3Sseaaa*=sxa=sssssasx*aaaaaaaBasxaseBSsssa===ss=*ss=====2===***=*==*«***=®*®®®* 0 500 0 0-0® 4414 TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS FIMD 24 PERM INPROV REVOLVING FUND DIV DO 20440 17650 4914 15735 15735 15735 -1915 «3SS*i*«3aM»>i»*»a*so.**a»s=aa*s==xss=aaB = s = = = = = = = i = = s» = »===*'.««««»^'®”=®*” = '* 107346 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .®. . . . . .?:??. 107346 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 aassa*» = saa3as2BS3aasaaaaraaaa«aBse- iaBSSBaBBassBsasBssaarsrBSSsaaaasaassssaBsra 151141 67650 11546 65735 65735 65735 -1915 (0.03) asBaaaxa BaasaasB as: assaa Basasssa BBSsasaa asstfarr* eaarat aaBasB bbbssbsbbb Page 34 RTiMi riTiiiii [iTiliH :Ti liirMlIi riT7W:ii:: I] iT.lfli] ri>JiiiiTi afiMi nKirvi] 1994 15000 8081 59001995150006675770019961500052317200 1997 15000 3750 7100 1998 15000 2250 7000 1999 15000 ro 90000 26737 34900 itllTlJ » •±:KSliMS ; t III iMfl ; 1 jj! ; 1 *m iltItM11^9 ; 1 iM iTiM1 i 1 ; 1 Cm ter"CITY OF ORONO46 1992 IMP BONS 0/S FUND OIV 00 Pago 39199119924139 AOMINSTRATIVE SERVICES**** TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES4306 SPEC ASMNT FORECAST•*** TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES4322 PRINTING A PUBLISHING•*** TOTAL PRINTING & PUBLISHING4610 BONO PRINCIPAL4620 BONO INTEREST4630 BONO PAYING AGENT*•** TOTAL OEBIT SERVICETOTAL AMOUNTS THIS FUND collar1993 1993 1993 INCREASE X.CU.I rKfS’,. (S;if,0 3000 3000 3000 3000 0 ==ss=:asssss30 0 0 3000 3000 3000 3000 0.s=a=raasss3ssas==s--- = = - = . = = = = = -.0000000 0 0 ;arrrrr==aa3aaaaa3araaraaaaa8a38aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarraaaaaaararr=aararraaaaararaaa 0000000 0 0 33a8aa3aaaaaa3aBaaaaaaaaaaar3aaaaaaaa====r==a======s3-ss...j.ss-sa3aaaa3aa8a8aB3a014329014329014329014329020002000200020001452901452901452901452900 0 0“®““®“““””””“*®”=®*-®s****"®*a==ss=*aas==saaaa883B88B3a83araaaBaa3a3ar raaaaa:000 148290 148290 148290 148290isasesssa aaaaaaaa aaaaarrr r=r===rr ssssssss sraaraaa aaaaaaaaaaaTHIS FUND ACCOUNTS FOR THE G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS, DATED 8-1-92, PRINCIPAL BALANCE OUTSTANDING 12-3^93 $2,000,000 NET INTEREST RATE ON BONOS IS 5.19X; INTEREST RATE ON SPECIAL ASSESSEMENTS IS 6 SOX BOHDS ARE PAYABLE PRIMARILY FROM THE COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEV^ AGAINST BENEFITED PROPERTIES, PLUS A TAX LEVY. FUTURE DEBT SERVICE & TAX LEVY REQUIRED YEAR BONO BONO ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PRINCIPAL INTEREST TAX LEVY SPEC ASMNTS CASH AND INVESTMENTS BALANCE AT 12-31-91 $ 0 aaaaaaaaaaa eaaa .aa.tra aaarr.raa aaraaaaa asazaaaa 1993 0 132,700 0 220,504 199'i 85,000 94,123 0 176,866 1995 90,000 91,100 0 170,848 1996 95,000 87,628 22,720 164,828 1997 105,000 83,676 33,280 158,810 1998-2008 1,625,000 2,000,000 46 1992 im> Bt»lS O/S FUND OIV 00 Page 39 CITY OF ORO» 50 1991 PUBITOTAL AMOUN1THIS FUND '; 12-1-91, Fl»NET INTERESTBONOS ARE CITY TO THE OF THE RENT CASH 6 INVE! 50 1991 PUBI 0 0.00155232232848232848232848776160.5019002000 2000 2000 100 0.051571320 234648 234848 234848 77716 0.49 74493 74500 6180 69955 69955 69955 -45452711000300300300-7007476475500611702557025570255-5245 Page 421993DOLLARINCREASE(DECREASE)72 WATER OPERATING FUND 01 V 91 WATER DEPARTMENT10O1 10Q? Y-T-D DEPT MGRACTUAL BUDGE: 5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMMO ADOT’TEO FROM PRIOR YR57691 58780SALARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEEadministrative servicePERA-CITY CONTRIBUTION FICA/MDCR-CITY CONTRIB HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS CLOTHING t PERSONAL EQUIP BLDG & GROUNDS M&R SUPPLY EQUIPMENT PARTS t ACCES UTILITY SYSTEM MAINT SUPP TO’AL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIR AUDITING t FINANCIAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE POSTAGE total COMMUNICATIONS PRINTING 8 PUBLISHING ADVERTISING TOTAL PRINTING-PUBLISHING-ADV 19336 6142518663605411.965 291511944975119524101020158114452614780895 61425 61425 264536053605105MOO410030002915291512549754975215241024101602020101445144514580895808956405 XINCREASEDECREASE) REMARKS•sasacasssasstsssassscstsssss*^ -=- ®0.040.09aaraBaraaaaearrrraraaaaaarrraaaaaaaaaraarB 190 18 100 rraxaarraaraaaar aat. taaasaar xearacaaaaaa 9900 0.00 :srsaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaasaassra lAxn lA^n 1940 1940 1940 310 T08 3130 108 2440 2440 2440 ‘690 -0.22 770 850 318 850 850 850 0 0.00 araaaaaraaaaaraaaraBaaaBaaaa 318 653 500 256 U?3 1350 574 1350 1350 1350 0 100 0 0 . . .0. . . .0. . . . . .0 . . . . .0.00 . . .. . . . . .150 0 175 175 175 25 0.17 72 WATER OPERATING FUW) OlV 91 WATER DEPARTMENT Page 42 72 WATER Gl Page 4 3XINCREASEUTILITIES TOTAL UTILITIES MAINT OFFICE EOUIPHENT NAINT AUTO EOUIPHENT NAINT NISC EOUIPHENT HAINT BLDGS & GROUNDS HAINT LINES-LIFT STAT NAINT WATER HAINS S PLANT TOTAL CONTRACT MAIN I-REPAIR LOGIS APPLICATIONS LOGIS-CLASS 2 ASSESSMENT DATA PROC/OISC SPACE TOTAL DATA PROCESSING MEETINGS-CONF-SCHOOLS INTER-GOVT SERVICES , TOTAL OTHER CONTRACT SERVICE GENERAL LIABILITY INSUR DOLLAR__ 1993 1993 1993 INCREASE1991 1992 Y-T-O DEPT MGR (DECREASE) _ _ _ _ACTUAL BUDGET 5-31-92 REOUEST RECOMMD ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE)3S5sssssascBssrasa33sssrssresrsssssn3srsrrrssrs = rrs5SS = = = = = i;rrsfs= = = s: = = r = r: = r = = s-s19751 25000 5670 25000 25000 25000 0 0.0019751 25000 5670 25000 25000 25000 0 0.00 REMARKS209200100100100-100 -0.505560040460060060000.0052150020450050050000.0012633C0030003000300000.0021000000.0081642150071762214522145221456450.03104022580077842634526345263455450.02«»saaaaaaTaasnssasrasasssass3rsss2«s83==r ==a33333aa33saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8aaaa3173418706242640264026407700.4150002502502502500.0097312503812402*.0 240 -1010 -0.81320731201005313031303130100.0033r33=333333333333333333333^:3333333338333333333333333333338333383333333333332333 235 800 423 800 800 800 0 0.00 34214 49250 6400 8000 8000 8000 -41250 -0.84 34449 50050 6823 8800 8800 8E00 -41250 -0.82 *‘-^^sSiaaaraaaaraaaaaaaaaraBaBraaaaaBaaarsaasaaaarsaaar.'aarT^asaaraaaaaaaaaaBar a 2457 2460 2700 2700 2700 240 0.10 rtif.wii Page 45CITY OF ORONO73 SEWER OPERATING FUND 1993AOMIN SERVICE TOTAL AOMIN SERVICE BOND INTEREST BONO PAYING AGENT FEES TOTAL DEBT SERVICE DIV 89 SEWER IMP BONO 9-16-89 __1993 19931991 1992 Y-T-0 DEPT MGRACTUAL BUDGET 5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMMD ADOPTEDAUUAL BUUUtI 5 J = = « = = = = = = = ====== = = = === ======«====*=«==»=«=====«»=™»“1700 1700 1700 0 0.00DOLLARINCREASE X(DECREASE) INCREASEFROM PRIOR TR (DECREASE)REMA.'»KS— i.fiC03SSS =ssrsss rrssssscrsasssasssssssi16)0 1700169'!) 1700 0 1700 1700 170072755 72760 60352o5 68320 68320 68320 •4440300300300-700686206862068620-5140 0.00rrrar;(0.06)(0.07)TOTAL AMOUNTS THIS DIVISKM 73020 73760 6035s=ss=sas=sss=====- = = ======= = = = = = = = = = =====*==*====“-*®'*““““®“''**“*®”®®*®“““**”“"''“"*'“?“«^r74710 75460 6035 70320 70320 70320 -5140 (0.07)r;: = ===== isaarraaa rarraarcoaarr aaaaaaraaaa sr.-arararaar. = = = = = ==== = =G.O. WATER & SEWER REVENUE BONOS saeaaaaasaSEK'ES 1989, DATED 9-16-89, FINAL NATURITY 2-1-2002raracaaaaaraaaaaraaarraxraaaanaaaa saaasaaaa'I 73 SEWER OPERATING FUND DIV 89 SEWER IMP BOND 9-16-89 TOTALPRINCIPALINTDISCPRINC & INT1992072,410.36 346.00 72,756.36199386,470.00 67,575.38 748.00 68,323.38199486,467.00 62,221.60 722.00 62,943.60199598,820.00 56,113.29 753.00 56,866.29199698,820.00 49,937.04 724.00 50,661.041997111,172.00 43,053.10 752.00 43,805.10 1998 111,172.00 36,002.90 718.00 36,720.90 1999 123,525.00 28,111.20 741.00 28,852.20 2000 135,877.00 19,351.22 761.00 20,112.22 2001 135,877.00 10,519.18 718.00 11,237.18 2002 148,230.00 815.27 733.00 1,548.27 1,136,430.00 446,110.54 7,716.00 453,826.54 asssssaaaaarara aaaarrarrra saaaaaaaasaas saseaaaaaass Page 45 CITY OF ORONO 73 SEWER OPERA4i00SALAR4111OVERT4139AOMIN4141PERA-4142 FICA/I4151HOSPI4152LIFE4153WORm....TOTAL4210OFFICI42204221CLOTH!4232 EQUIPP4234UTILIT ***.TOTAL 4300 AUDITI 4303 i.EGAL- 4305 ENGINE 4306 OTHER ....TOTAL 1 4320 TELEPHi 4321 POSTAGi ....TOTAL { 73 SEWER OPEMTI Pane 45XINCREASETR (DECREASE) REMASKS«3-ss2-asresssasss*5a**»a**«*s*^»0 0.00 -•-.saajBssStS0 0.00lasssaaaarssssaa^0 (0.06)(0.70)10 (0.07)aaaaaaaaaaaaaaasAO (0.07)sa ssaaaaaaaa.36.38.60.29 .04 1.10 1.90 5.20 5.22 7.18 8.27 6.34 aaaaa Page 45 CITY OF ORONO73 SEWER OPERATING FUND DIV 92 SEWER DEPARTMENT1991 Paqe 461992r-T-D 1993DEPT 1993MGR 1993 DOLLARINCREASE(DECREASE)XINCREASEACTUAL 3U0GFT 5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMW ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE)4f00 SALARIES-REGULAR EMPLOYEE arararrrrr=rrar.*;s = =88128 08060 aaaaTS2a-««a29288;araaaa = 392016 saaaaaara raaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaeaaaascaaaaeaaaa!92016 92016 3956 0.044111OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEE 6637 6000 3437 6180 6180 6180 180 0.034139ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE 1460 1530 14530 14530 14530 13000 8.504141PERA-CITU CONTRIBUTION 3910 4210 1488 44U0 4409 4400 190 0.054142FICA/MOCR CITY CONTRIB 5897 7200 1791 7510 7510 7510 310 0.044151HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE 3578 3400 1793 5630 5630 5630 2230 0.664152LIFE INSURANCE 26 20 13 35 35 35 15 0.754153WORKMANS COMP INSURANCE 3601 3430 2645 3533 3553 3533 103 0.03TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICED 113237 113850 41455 133834 133834 133834 19984 0.184210OFFICE SUPPLIES ^ ^ ^ mm54 -•aaassssr ar aasssasrssacaaaaaaaSBaaaaaaaesBaaasacraaaaaaaaraaaaaar asssasa 50 50 50 50 0 0.004220MOrjR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 1325 1500 641 1545 1545 1545 45 0.034221CLOTH.ING & PERSONAL EQUIP 458 500 138 500 5C0 500 0 0.004232EQUIPMENT PARTS & ACCES 1262 1200 877 1200 1200 1200 0 0.00 4234 UTILITY SYSTEM MAINT SUPPLY ti 471 800 219 800 800 800 0 0.00 TOTAL SUPPLIES-MAIN-REPAIR 3570 4050 1875 4095 4095 4095 45 0.01 4300 AUDITING 8 FINANCIAL asasasrar 2L50 saaraarraaaraaaaaaar 2070 aasaaraaaraar sararaearrraaanr.aaaarraaaaaaaBaff arrasa 2215 2215 2215 145 0.07 4303 LEGAL'CONSULTING SERVICES 200 200 200 200 0 0.00 4305 ENGINEERING CONSULTING 1376 1200 340 1200 1200 1200 0 0.00 4306 OTHER CONS LTtHG SERVICES 683 0 663 0 0 0 0 0.00 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4209 3470 1003 3615 3615 3615 145 0.04 4320 TELEPHONE rssacsaaaaaaaccarxaraaaaraarraaaaBaxaarra* aasaarrrrrrarrr-ra 329 400 83 400 hOO 400 0 ararara 0.00 4321 POSTAGE 1226 1200 443 1230 1230 1230 30 0.03 •A**TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 1600 526 1630 1630 1630 3v)0.02 aaaasBaaraaasaaBaaraaraaaaaaarseaaaaaacaaasasrrsrrsrsaaaaasasar aarsx aazaaea REMARKS ’asaaaaasa 73 SEWER OPEWTING FUND DIV 92 SEWER OEPARrMENT 1993 1993 1993 INCREASE X19911992Y-T-O DEPT HGR (DECREASE)INCREASEACTUALBUDGET5-31-92 REQUEST RECOMMO ADOPTED FROM PRIOR YR (DECREASE)ssrsss3ssrsss*:=s = = :=================================*=^==========220 100 20 100 100 100 0 0.0044017700000.0066010019710010010000.00ss3asssssss3sssssrss==sssr3 « mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm ■mm mm mm mm mm m^ mm. »rassssaaaaaaaarrraraarraararrraaaaaH6341300059861500015000150002000P-1514100000.001463413000612715000150001500020000.15rasassrscsassseaassssssssssasssssxsssssssssss======*==r========aaraa aarrrrsrrrra500345005005000c.oo05003450050050000.00Baraaaaraaarrraaaa= ?r = rraa = 3ssaarsrrs;arrraar3rarrra=aaaaa=a====S5===ss®======-*===335730030030030000.0068360079460060060000.001258160031416001600160000.002041125000489025000250002500000.002270927500599827500275002750000.00aes=SB=sa=«=======a-^=== ======== = = = = = -= = *= = = ==*=“===="”=‘”®* raesasssaasassssas4045436014564910491049105500.136201320202000.00 65000600025002200 65000 AOOOO 75700 105000 37465 37060 12856 38130 38130 38130 1070 0.030 0 374 0 0 0 0 0.001494915500488818500185001850030000.191460153045304530453030001.961680166067617101711^710 50 0.0331274020974320032003200-820 -0.20nil2880150632403240 3240 360 0.131010410101000.001221128010551430143014301500.126135000000.0063297 63940 223«3 70750 70,750 70,750 6810 0.11ssssssssssssssssssssrssrassssrrssssssssssssrssssssrssssrssssssssssaassssssrsrrss69 350 50 200 200 200 -150 -0.431195150090153015301530300.021211604016016016000.00 1581 4500 2476 3500 3500 3500 -1000 -0.22 2087 730 937 1000 1000 1000 270 0.37 10 0 135 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 5063 7240 szarsaaaaaaaacaaaaaa 1460 1330 3728 6390 6390 6390 1550 1550 1550 -850 «■ ^ w aw ^ ^ M 220 -0.12 =z=rrrarra 0.17 85 0 0 0 0 0.00 50 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1595 1330 0 araaaaass = = = rrrrrr = = = r = 2:rar=z 1022 1300 454 1550 1550 =rraara=rz==aa=== 1300 1300 1550 220 0.17 zrsraaaaarraaeseseaaaaaaeaaasaaaaa 1300 0 0.00 3 50 2 50 50 50 0 0.00 1025 1350 456 1350 1350 1350 0 0.00 24 0 0 0 0 0.009797001501000100010003000.431046165070016501650165000.00516812000584650065006500-5500 •0.467217 U350 U34aaacsassasassssss=============150 200 55 9150 9150 9150 -5200 -0.36— ssasa'iaasaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaasaaasasa275 275 275 75 0.38 150 200 55 275 aaaaaaaaaaaaraaaararaaaa^araassasssi* 6402 6400 7040 275 275 75 as==s===r======sss*========»***** 7040 7040 640 0.38 asaaasaaaas 0.10 474 480 530 530 530 50 0.10 60 60 70 70 70 10 0.17 250 250 275 275 275 25 0.10 239 260 295 295 295 35 0.13 40 40 45 45 45 5 0.13 2770 2770 3050 3050 3050 280 0.10 1375 1400 1375 1375 1375 1375 -25 •0.02 63 60 70 70 70 10 0.17 •mi:■fii iIlMiTi' JECREASE) RENARiCS8=sa****a*»*sssaars«ssn*ssssaratt«*aaa0.190.000.720.160.000.000.000.19Bssasasssa0.000.00Bsrssssssa0.03fcSSSSSSSSZ0.03Bssaasaaaa 2.452 (.05)22,064 (.45)4,903 (.,10)4,903 (.10) 9,806 (.20) 4,903 (.10)2.525 (.05)22,723 (.45)5,050 (..10)5,050 (.10)10,099 (.20) 5,050 (.10)2.040 ( 05)14,280 (.35)4,080 (..10) 8,160 (.20)12,240 (.30)2,100 (05)14.702 (.35)4,201 (..10)8,401 (.20)12,602 (.30)1,729 (.05)12,100 (.35)3,457 (..10)6,914 (.20)10,371 (.30)1,781 (.05)12,464 (.35)3,561 (..10)7,122 (.20)10.(54 (.30)1,557 (.05)26,469 (.85)3,114 (.10)1,511 (.05)25,689 (.85)3,022 (..10)2,796 (.05)47,532 (.85)5,592 (.10)2,796 (.05)47,530 (.85)5,592 C .10) ROLLThe Council present: MiCallaiian an following r Moorse* Pub! Jeanne Habu! Naab. MayoiOPEN PUBLICThe AffidavNewell Weed distrlbut loi tax laws ar- the ability values of have not to tax I lab I 11 sI Ides on ^ to reported Circuit Bre create a moJabbour askWeed stated In a dlffe disabled ar tax relief.Mayor PaterMoorse exp adoption o' stated this on the Imp Orono star Department AdmInIstra the CouncI changes. 1 distribute reported C the proble Page 55Page 544.5652,550iJ.8V7kl.23277.335)1990 1991 19®22.924,010 3,040,260 3,024,8902,876,180 3,021,210 3.024,8902,951,471 2,852,302 m m2,900,516 2,905,628 m «50,955 (53,326)# *3,132,5723,132,57252.690152.690 1,'.,85,546 1,585,546 1,644,8311,644,631 1.644,8311.644,831 • •1,800,235 KXI.OX 100.0X 109.0X 100.0S • • --• *5,9-«11,850 552.690 s = = rsa«i 1.585,546 1 650.741 1,656,681 1,800,235 50.SX 54.2X 54.3*54.7X 57.5* ■ Page 54 MINUTES OF THE 1993 BUDGET HEARING CITY OF ORONO HELD DECEMBER 1, 1992ROLLThe Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Paterson, CouncIImembers Gabriel Jabbour, EdwardCallaiion and Mary Butler. J. DIann Goetten was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator RonMoorse, PubI Ic Works 01 rector John Qarhardson, Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Finance Director Tom Kuehn, and City Recorder Tar I Naab, Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.OPEN PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 8:03 P.M.The Affidavit of Publication was noted.Newell Weed presented the Council with Information concer .ing distribution of tax liability and State Aid. He stated Minnesota s tax laws are based on the theory that all taxes paid are based on the ability to pay. Due to groat Inflation In the past years, the values of land In the suburban cities has escalated but Incomes have not to that degree. The tax system also ends up assess Ingmoi« tax liability to people with loss ability to pay. He reviewed slides on *he Voss theory, which compares social security numbers „ r.po?t.d * com. .no t.«i, poM. H. .t.t.d In 1993 Circuit Broake. •:lll be trying to cap property tax liability and create a more ft.lr distribution of State Aid. Jabbour asked If commercial property Is taxed In the same manner. Weed stated commercle:, lental and non-homestead In a different ma.mer than residential. Ha ® disabled and lower *ncomo families are those In greatest need o tax relief. Mayor Paterson thanked Mr. weed for his presentation. Moorse explained the Truth and Taxation “J®"®oc«s *HenHootlon of the City Budget Is the final step In the process. He :f.?SiThU mating ^s a Jay for on the Impact of the tax assessed ^hen the Orono started the budget process last '^P from which the Department Heads submitted budget JqJ Administrator and Finance DJ'■®p*°: =7'’''"‘i * a.; «.7/pr, the problems the City may encounter with regard to 1 MINUTES OF THE 1993 BUDGET HEARING CITY OF ORONO HELD DECEMBER 1, 1992budget. He said they have tried to keep the budget as fiscally responsible as possible.Moorse explained the proposed budget Includes a 3.2% overall Increase of the General Fund, which Includes a contingency amount of $50,000 for inticipated costs related to the Highway 12 corridor study and the potential cut In State Aid. He said the revenue loss experienced by Orono Is In part due to the economic conditions and the uncertainty of the Highway 12 situation. He reviewed slides showing the Impact of the proposed Increase and added because of the loss of the three tiered taxing system, the burden of the tax Increase has beer shifted to the homes taxed within the first tier. The Increase In t.he budget represents f 9.6* Increase In the City’s tax for the first tier properties, and a decrease for the remainder of properties.Barb Lohmann, 1860 tskevlew Terrace, stated the City’s portion of her tax bl'I has Increased 17*, not the 9.6* Increase as proposed.Kuehn explained the additional Increase Is due to the Increase In the valuation of the property, as well as the Incrase In the tax capacily < ata.Doris Merkert, 1840 Lakevlew Ter '■ace, expressed a siml lar complaint and stated their Income has actually been reduced, but their taxis keep going up along with the value of the home. Jabbour explained the Stata tax system formerly used a three tier system, but the higher tier has been eliminated and the balance absorbed by the lower tier. Callahan stated 98* of the problem comes from the Legislature. Ho suggested the property owners questioning their valuation appear at the Board of Review In the spring. James Steffenson, 4C65 West Branch Road, notjd when he purchased his home In 1988 his taxes were $700 and now the taxes are $1,400. Moorse clarified that the $1,400 Is the total tax bill for the property, not Just the City’s portion. Jabbour stated when he first moved to Orono, ..Is property Increased ln>value six times In four years. In part due to the fact that It became fashionable to move to Orono. He added, the Sta.e law mandates the City to keep the overall City valuation within a certain percentage of the appraised value, or the County will Increase the City-wide value to that level. Page 55 [•1 *1.1 • ^ *1 vlij •It !• L* I: M ;!• •!« I • r»nTi*T.Tir ui*H«x>UEH #rK* PaqG 56minutes 0*^ the budget hearingue. ORONOheld DECEMBER f, igggadjournmentArR.t.rson, Mayor “ Page 56 //o\ O'CITY of ORONORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3208A resolution to adopt the1993 BUDGETBE IT RESOLVED, by tho City Council of the City of Otono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the 1993 General Fund budget is determined to be as follows:ESTIMATED REVENUESTaxes - General $1,775,915- Special Levy City Assessments 5, . ‘i -i- Tax Abatements 18,9:0Licenses and Permits 104,257Intergovernmental207,900Charges for Services 804,350Fines and Forfeits 61,000Interest Income 35,000Miscellaneous19,400Transfers From Other Funds 100,430TOTAL$3,152,572naiaMaKBxtsaAPPROPRIATED EXPENDITURLfJ General Government $ 655,935 Public Safety 1,664,695 Street Maintenance 489,175 Parks and Recreation 53,396 Recycling Program 91,460 Engineering - Unallocated 4,130 Reimbursable Expenditures 20,489 Special Projects and Contingency 88,392 Transfers To Other Funds 64,900 TOTAL $3,132,572 8ssras«vs«aa Adopted by the City Council of the City of Oron*', Minnesota at a special meeting held December 1, 1992. Page 57 Page 57 , i,' ^'A- e -•% 'i'' Paqe 57)city of,ral Fund257900350000,000,400.430THT ty of Otono, 2. layoT T Page 'i Page 58^EsHOf*CITY of ORONORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILNO. 3209^ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIN.AL 1992 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1993BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 1993 upon the taxable prope ty in the City of Orono, for the following purposes:General Fund $1,775,915Special Assessments agaiusi. City property for the City's share of 1985 sanitary sewer project (G.O. Sewer Imp Bend 1985)Lost Tax Receipts Due to Abatements 1991SG.O. Sewer Improvement Bond 1985G.O. Siwer Improvement Bond 1900 G.O. 3ewer, Water, Street Improvement Bond 1982 Bonds of Other Government Units - H.R.A. Building Bond l''TAL 5,35018,97050,00016,100 5,500 249,000 $2,120,835 The City Clerk Is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of I’ennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a special meeting held December 1, 1992. AT EST! 1 Barbara K. Peterson, Mayor othy ffrTHallin', City cleVp 112492 Page 58 O. O'Page 59CITY of ORONORESOLUTJOM OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3217A Rnnoct ’fioNF.STAnLISIIING SM.ARIP.S FOR CITT PHTLOYEES FOR 1993Mlnn»sotf. t'hnt and waU» fo°i “aty empl oypes^ be'^e*t»bl 1 sh”dA* fcfllown, effective Jonuaty 1, 1993iNAMERon Moorse Dorothy Hall In Stephen Sullivan John Gerhardson Jack Drinkhaus Thomas Kuehn Jeanne Mabusth Michael Gaffron Lyle OmanRonald S.teffenhaqen Stephen Weekman Linda Vee Carole Haseman Sue Robzlne Wayne Quost Steve Hansen Dale Skreen James Gregory Barry Rathbun Randy 0*Brien Scott Obetaigner Gregory Palmer Charlotte Knutson Linda Walters Bruce Vang Carol Hanslng Jamie Bosma Ricky Karnitz Scott Boris John Schoenhoff David Goman David Nelson Janice Kennen POSITIONCity Administrator City Clerk Police Chief Public Works Director Public Works Supr, II Treas/FI nance Director Toning Administrator Asst. Zoning Administrator Building Official Golf Course Supervisor On Site Septic Manager Deputy City Cletk/Adniln Sec. Secrctary/Recorder Police Secretary Public Works Supt. I Public Works Maintenance Public Works Maintenance Public Works Maintenance Public Works Maintenance Public Works Maintenance Public Works Maintenance Public Workn Maintenance Depty Treas/St. Acet. Clerk Asst. Finance Director Field Inspector Asst. Police Secretory P.T. Copy & File Clerk I P.T. Police Officer, P.T. Police Officer, P.T. Police Officer, P.T. Community Service Officer P.T Community Service Officer P.T Clerk, Police P.T. 1992 SALARY 1993 SALARY$58,498.00 869,108.8032,117.08 33,081.0052,106.08 53,539.0049,927.00 50,374.0840,783.00 41,984.0054,850.00 56,358 0046,692.00 47,975.0037,284.80 38,309.0937,284.00 38,309.0832,117.00 33,801.0028,288.00 29,066.8811.726/Hr 12.849/Hr11.189/llr 11.415/Hr12.344/Ht 12.6B3/llr 16.622/Hr 17.079/Hr 13.045/tlc 13.541/Hr 13.045/Hr 13.541/Hr 14.538/Hr 14.538/Ht 13.179 /Hr 13.541/Hr 13.179/Ht 13.541/Ht 12.520/llt 12.B64/llt 12.528/llr 12.e64/llr 12.344/Hr 12.603/Hr 14.316/Hi 14.718/Hr 15.441/Hr 15.B66/Hr 10.492/Hr 18.78l/Ht 9.836/Ht 10.186/Hr 10.343/Ht 10.627/Hr 10.308/Ht 18.627/Hr 18.308/Hr 10.627/Hr 5.463/Hr 5.613/Ht 6.436/Hr 6.613/Ht 7.044/Hr 7.23B/Hr BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that mileage for City use of private cars on City business be reimbursed at $.28 per mile. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a ar meeting field December 1 4, 1 992. !)3yotHyTy '/5Trr»7^rty~i^ipl2QQ2- 2 Iqoi I l^dniata Petersor, liayor Paae 59 ^RONOCfTV COUNCIL"O* 1*9J Oiono. •* b* esUblUhedy salary.49*.«f .117.f* 196.••• 27.M697.0s284.00284.00117.00288.00 72«/Hr189/Hr144/Ht '27/Hr 145/Ht '45/Hr ’'•/Hr If nit 79/Hr 29/Hr 29/Hr 44/Mr 1«/Hi • 1/Hr »2/Hr 1«/Hr IJ/Mf '•/Hr I8/Hr J/Hr 6/Mt 4/Hr 11_93 SALAR?860,100.903J»991.00S3>S39.0059.374.0041.909.00 56,J50 0047.975.0038.309.0038.309.0023.891.0029.066.00 12.849/Hr 11.415/Ht 12.683/Hr 17.079/Hr 13.541/Hr lJ.541/Hr 14.5J0/Ht ‘3.541/Hr 13-541/Hr 12.864/Hr 12.864/Hr 12.683/Mt 14.710/Ht 15.8 66/H r 19-781/Hr 18.196/Ur 19.62 7/Ht 19.627/Ht 19.627/Mr 5.61 I/Hr 6-611/Ht 7.238/Ht 1 prl»«t0 c.t» Inneaota , ^’age 59 Page 59 12992.3(99)CITY OF ORONO COMPKN.9ATION PLAN APPENDIX B POINT GROUPINGSROUPINGPOINT RANGE MID POINT POSITIONS IN GROUPING144 - 47 45.5 cso248 - 51 49.5 Laborer Clerical I352 - 55 53.5 Clerical II456 - 59 57.5 Police Secretary Sr. Accounting Clerk Deputy Clerk/Secretary Recorder 5 60 - 64 62 Public Works Maintenance 6 65 - 68 66.5 Patrol Officer On-Site Septic Manager (E) Asst. Finance Director 7 69 - 73 71 City Clerk (E) Golf Course Supervisor (E) Building Inspector 8 74 - 78 76 Public Works Supervisor I 9 79 - 83 81 Asst. Zoning Administrator Building Official (E) 10 84 - 88 86 Lieutenant (E) Public Works Supervisor M 11 89 - 100 95 BuiIdlng/Zoning Admin. (E) Public Works Director (E) 12 101 ** 110 105 Police Chief (E) Finance Director (E) 13 111 • 124 117.5 City Administrator (E) Page 60 i (B) - Exempt Paqe 60 pageroupingatyiq Clerk ^Secretary Maintenance er ;ic Manager (E) ;ci Director eivlsor lE) tot jpetvlsor I jwlnlatrator (E) lal (E) petvlsot 11 Ikdmln. (E> tectot IE) r (E) tot (t> apt Page 60 iPage 61CITY OF ORONO COMPENSATION PLAN EXPECTED PERFORMANCE LEVELS 1993 LEVEL STEP STEP STEP STEPIIIIIIIV1$9,019 $9,550 $10,080 $10,6112$9,545 $10,107 $10,668 $11,2303$10,158 $10,756 $11,353 $11,9514$10,781 $11,415 $12,049 $12,6835$11,510 $12,187 $12,864 $13,5416$12,503 $13,239 $13,974 $14,7107$13,486 $14,279 $15,072 $15,8668$14,517 $15,371 $16,225 $17,0799$15,655 $16,576 $17,497 $18,41810$17,124 $18,132 $19,139 $20,14611$19,606 $20,759 $21,912 $23,06512$23,031 $24,386 $25,740 $27,095 13 $27,292 $28,898 $30,503 $32,108 Clir OF OKONO COHPEMSATIOH PLAN EXPECTED PERFORMANCE LEVELS PART TIME RECUUR POSITIONS 1993 LEVEL STEP STEP STEP STEP CLERICAL 1 (L2/SII MAX) 2 S8.S90 $9,095 $9,600 $10,106 POLICE SECT (L4/S1 MAX) 4 iy.163 $9,703 $10,241 $10,781 PATROL OFFICER (L6/SI MAX) 6 m.6l7 $11,252 $11,878 $12,503 Page 61' STEP STEPIIIIV$10,000 $10,611$10,668 $11,230$11,353 $11,951$12,049 $12,683$12,864 $13,541$13,974 $14,710$15,072 $15,866^16.225 $17,079(17.497 $18,418!19.139 $20,14621.912 $23,06525.740 $27,095 30.503 $32,108 February 1993 To the Mayor and members of the City Council. Recently I put my name in for the position on the Metropolitan Waste Commission that would represent your city. I would be greatly appreciative if you would send a letter to the Metropolitan Council recommending me for the position. My experience is as follows: Fourteen years on the Shorewood City Council TWO years as Mayor of Shorewood Served two terms on the Board of Directors for the Metropolitan Municipalities Association, during which I chaired one of the policy committees. Assisted in the organization of Women in Government, was on the Board of Directors, and served as an officer. Assisted in the organization of Women in City Government, was on the Board of Directors, was the organization's second President and later served as the Treasurer. Served for ten years on the Board of Directors for Suburban Public Health Nursing (It merged widi Mpls Nursing and became Visiting Nurses during the time 1 was on the Board.) A thirty-year resident of Shorewood. While on the Shorewood City Council, I \ ad occasion to discuss several matters with the members of the Waste Commission Board and also with the Administrative personnel. Generally, the discussion centered on the inequities of the fee schedule for those cities around Lake Minnetonka. At other times I debated the decision that was made regarding their lines, and where "1 and 1" was entering the system. If I am appointed to the Board, I would continue to pursue those two issues. My extensive community service demonstrates that I am honest, hard ­ working, thoughtful, and tenacious. I have always tried to get all possible information on an issue before making a decision, and 1 will continue to work in that manner. If I am appointed to the Board I will listen to the Councils I w'ould represent and do my best for them. Thank you for your consideration of my request. IL TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator February 3, 1993 SUBJECT: City Facilities Budget Update At the January 11 Council meeting staff provided a city facilities update which indicated the remaining contingency amount (assuming the cold storage facility and police security cameras were deferred/deleted) was $27,660. Since that update several expenditure items have been added and several potential upcoming expenditure items have been identified. The additional expenditures are as follows: 1.The City has paid the SAC fee of $8,250.00. This amount had not been accounted for in the budget update numbers. 2.The emergency generator has been connected to natural gas versus an LP gas tank. Although this has cost the City $1,795 it will save the City the cost of renting and installing an LP gas tank. 3 .Miscellaneous electrical work orders totalling $1,584. These include; a.) providing pov/er to the water coolers in the public works building and che lunch room. b.) providing temporary power to the construction manager trailer. c.' providing an electrical feed to the air compressor for the sprinkler system. d.) providing lights in the two janitor closets. e.) providing a light in the police mezzanine area. Caulk joints at the overhead door aprons in the public works building. This item was not included in the bid specifications. The cost is $193. Add an electrical sub-panel in the police building to accommodate addxtional circuits beyond the original specifications. The cost is $991. The total additional expenditure item amount is $12,813 reduces the contingency amount to $14,853. This i city Facilities Budget Update February 2, 1993 page 2 The items that have been identified as potential additional costs are as follows: 1.Provide heat tape to a portion of the public works roof to prevent heavy ice buildup. 2.Add electrical outlets in the mezzanine utility rooms to provide a power supply for the maintenance of equipment located in these rooms. 3.Provide window treatments at the administrative entry to block direct sunlight at the three clerical work stations. 4.There is a potential need for additional heat vents in Liome office areas. It would be cost effective to install these vents if it would enable the thermostats to be set lower and eliminate the use of space heaters. 5.The Architect is developing a signage plan and costs both for external signage and to complete the internal signage package. If all of these items were to be approved the total cost would be substantially less than the remaining contingency amount. .. i Senior Please join us Community Services at an Open House has moved into a new home from 3 to 5:30 p.m. Ct 2 Thursday, Feb. 11 © - V<•> I r r Suburban Services Center 10709 Wavzata Blvd., Minnetonka Lower Level TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:February 3, 1993 SUBJECT: North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition The Council at its January 25 meeting requested information regarding the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition. The attached brochure outlines the organization and major activities of the coalition. The Police Chief will be available at the February 8 Council meeting to provide additional information if requested. iiiiniiiTiTiniiinniiWiiiimiiiriiiiilitTiriliim lilffMlfmnnltjiifriiiPHWroinfiffinniniliWItllffirtTiTtTra nrtKiFtr#!r^TiTti triitill• ir«A>iir«rtioi Miltlt r«T;»r«it I • t tlsTi mm rtrtnirti •iirtfiTOUit mW9]rtTncifit] r«wt [•Tilt] TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Tom Kuehn, Finance Director February 3, 1993 -n SUBJECT: Medical Leave of Absence - Assistant Finance Director Assistant Finance Director Linda Walters is undergoing cancer treatment at Abbott hospital. The procedure will require her to be hospitalized for three to four weeks with an additional one to two weeks of rest at home. She will be hospitalized starting Monday, February 0 and anticipates returning to work about March 22. « MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Planning Commission Chair Maureen Bellows, Charles Schroeder, Candace Rowlette, Jeff Johnson and *^d Cohen. Stephen Peter-on was absent. The following represented the City Staff: Zoning Administrator Jeanno Mabusth, Septic Manager Stephen Weckman, and City Recorder Te*"! Naab. Edward Callahan, Gabriel Jabbour and JoEllen Hurr were present. Chair Bellows called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) #1627 SAMUEL A. MCCLOUD, BIG ISLAND RECORD LOT 22 - VARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:25 P.M. David Anderson was oresent for the application. Mabusth reviewed the for' jr appi Icatlon for the Planning Commission that Involved a lot line rearrangement In March 1991, and an after- the-fact variance dealing with decking, retaining walls, and extensive stairways, which were constructed some time after the 1987 storm. She noted 40 s.f. of the deck attached to the existing residence and all decking near the lake are within the 0-75’ zone. Proposed hardcover within the lakeshore has been reduced and retaining walls remain, which the applicant proposes to minimize the 3.2 to 5 visual Impact with plantings. The applicant proposes 3.2X hardcover In the 0-75’ zone versus 10.8* existing. Anderson reviewed the types of plantings he proposes for the property. Cohen asked what comprises the 3.2* hardcover proposed. Mabusth explained prior to the 1987 storm, the property had approximately 1* 0-75’ hardc'*'er wnich comprised a stairway to the lake necessary because of -.ne steep slopes. The 3.2* proposed hardcover Includes the 40 s.f. of deck attached to the dwelling. Chair Bellows expressed concern about allowing the retaining walls to remain, which In essence is the "bones" for the decking, and questioned what Is to stop the applicant from rebuilding the deck areas. Sh« asked how the building Inspector felt about the plantings versus the railing alci^g the retaining walls. Mabusth stated plantings as such have been approved before In other IocatIons. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO>«ISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1627 - CONT. Rowlette felt they should be given the opportunity to review the property prior to making a decision. Cohen stated he would not approve after-the-fact hardcover Installed within the 0-75’ zone, and agreed with Rowlette that they should be allowed to Inspect the property. Chair Bellows indicated the proposal Is based on an engineer s opinion, not a signed recommendation by a licensed engineer. She felt If this were approved they would be allowing a potential for the decks to be rebuilt in the future. She felt the deck attached to the residence Is enormous, and she relt that should be reduced to meet the 75’ setback. Anderson stated his client would not object to reducing the size cf the attached deck. Chair Bellows suggested tabling th'^ application to allow the applicant time to complete the following: 1) the engineering to be done properly, Including modification of the retaining walls; 2) revise the plans so that any flat area remaining is not wider than 3’; 3) deck attached to cabin to be altered so as not to encroach the 0-75’ setback area; and 4) portions of retaining walis needed to support decks to be removed. Johnson asked how much of the retaining wall system was Installed to retain the slope versus how much was built to support the decking. He supported the Idea of retaining the slopes that fell In from the storm. Anderson stated he could not answer that question. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Schroeder, to table Application #1627 for Samuel A. McCloud, Big Island Record Lot 22, to allow the applicant time to revise his proposal and submit any additional required documents. Ayes 5, nays 0. Chair Bellows recommended the applicant resubmit his proposal In time for the Planning Commission to visit the property. MINUTES OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 (#2) #1787 ROBERT L. WAADE, CONDITIONAL^USE^PERMI^ - PUBLIC HEARING 7:25 - 7:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub Iicat I on and Certificate of Mai IIng were noted. Mr. & Mrs. Waade were present. Mabusth explained the applicants propose a conditional use permit to ailow a non-rental guest apartment to be Installed within their residence currently under construction. She noted access would bo via a secondary door leading into an open area which Is part of the garage. Chair Bellows asked the hardships for the request. Mrs. Waade explained their son has diabetes and has major medical problems with which she and her husband need to help, and by living near him they could do so. This option would provide him with some independence. Mabusth clarified the applicants are not asking for a variance and therefore do not have to prove hardship. Chair Bellows expressed concern that the entrance to the apartment Is not via the principal portion of the residence as required by code. Mr. Waade suggested the addition of a wall at the base of the landing which would In essence make that room a part of the house. Cohen felt that would be reasonable. Chair Bellows felt that would still not meet the Intent of the code. Schroeder explained to the applicants that their Intent Is to prevent the rental of the unit In future years. Chair Bellows asked If conditional use permit approval could run with the owner/applicant rather than the property. Cohen asked how a subsequent purchaser of the property would have knowledge of such an arrangement. He felt it should be registered In the chaIn of title. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1787 - CONT. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of Application #1787 for Robert L. Waade, 998 WIidhurst Trail, for a conditional use permit tc allow a non-rental apartment unit within the principal residence, subject to the applicant redesigning the proposal in accordance with the recommendation, and a resolution be filed in the chain of title noting approval of such Is applicable to the current owner only and any subsequent owner must obtain approval from the City prior to use. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#3) #1789 LIBBIE HOPWOOD, 1205 LAKEVIEW AVENUE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 - 7:50 P.M. The AffIdavit of Pub I I cat ion and Cert Ificate of Mai IIng were noted. Br I It Goetze, appiI cant’s father, was present for this appiicatlon. Mabusth explained the original house was destroyed by a fire, and that residence had a street side deck which did receive variance approval. The proposed residence will be replaced In the same envelope as the existing, but the setback variances required are less as the deck will not be replaced. Goetze noted they will be using the existing footings. Mabusth added the proposed residence meets height requirements. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend approval of Application #1789 for LIbble Hopwood, 1205 Lakevlew Avenue, for variances to construct a residence using the existing footings. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#4) #1790 MINNETONKA CENTER FOR THE ARTS, 20^V NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:52 - 7:55 P.M. The Af f i C'av it Pub I I cat Ion and Car t i f I cate of Ma I I I ng were noted. Ralph Martinson was present. Mabusth explained the Art Center Is requesting the InstalI at ion of a small directional sign along County Road 15. The applicant has contacted Dave Zetterstrom from Hennepin County, who has approved a location for the sign. i MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1790 - CONT. It was moved by Chair Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of Application #1790, Minnetonka Canter for the Arts, on the property located at 2040 North Shore Drive, for a variance to install a directional sign along County Road 15. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#5) #1791 BLAKE BICHANICH, 332 WESTLAKE STREET - VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 7:55 - 6:00 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub I I cat I on and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Bichanich were present for this application. Weckman explained the applicants own two adjacent parcels, for which they propose a 50 s.f. addition to the south side of the residence and another addition of a basement lower level to the north side of the residence. They arc proposing to move the northern structure 1C’ clo«^er to the lake to enhance the view, and a tower is proposed to join the two structures. The property has been assessed for one sewer unit. The fardship Is the narrowness of the lots. Johnson asked the setback from the lake. Bichanich noted the houses are approximately 150’ to 200’ from the lake. It was moved by Chair Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approvaI of AppI I cat I on #1791, Blake BlchanIch, 332 West!ake Street, for side lot line variances to construct additions to the existing residences. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) #1792 DON GRONBERG, 110 LEAF STREET - VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8:15 P.M. The AffIdavlt of PubIIcatIon and Certificate of Mai Iing were noted. Don Ironberg and Mark Gro jerg were present. Mabustn briefly reviewed the areas of lots within the neighborhood a«id two w'"ea variances approved since 1975 based on current rural standards. The property now has sewer available. However, the shoreland reg.jiations require the residence to be setback 75 from the edge of the tributary Is opposed to the 26’ setback previously required. This requirement reduces the building envelope, as well as the need tc. dedicate right-of-way for Leaf Street. r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1792 - CONT. Mark Gronberg submitted a letter Indicating the acceptance of a 25’ right-of-way from the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Mabusth noted they are asked to approve a shoreland setback a.id area variances. The tributary Is considered a protected tributary. She added the average area of developed lots In this neighborhood Is approximately 1+ acres. Don Gronberg reviewed that he purchased the lot In 1958, and at that time the property was dry to the southeastern most stake of the property. He noted the homeowners along the tributary are responsible for the height of that body. He added this is a holding pond for Lake Minnetonka. He Indicated his neighbors on either side are considering additions to their homes. Chair Bellows asked if it would be more beneficial to approve a street setback variance. Mark Gronberg explained the run-off comes from up on the hill straight to the creek, and with this proposed plan there Is more of an outpouring towards the street and down to a grassy area and essentially to the creek. He felt this proposal Improves the drainage situation In the area. He adde.'' there is thought of widening the road which would place the residence too close to the road. CIcI Graham, 95 Leaf Street, expressed her favor of the proposed structure and felt It would be a positive addition to the neighborhood. Cole Graham, 95 Leaf Street, urged the Commission to consider the project, and added the adjacent properties will probably follow suit. He noted a need for the houses In the area to be upgraded. Johnson pointed out that the property was platted prior to the adoption of the current regulations. He also added, the applicant purchased the property 34 years ago with the Intent to build on the property. He felt they should recognize that fact. Rowlette questioned the fact that the neighbors control the dam. Mabusth cIar1fIed that the homeowners’ association working with the DNR control the level of the water. Mark Gronberg added any repairs necessary are the responsibility of the homeowners’ association. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1792 - CONT. Mabusth questioned Gronberg as to his statements regarding the control of the dam anJ how that relates to the tributary today and Impact on his property. Don Gronberg stated the original creek was In the center of the current creek, and the buiIding envelope would be 75’ from that original creek bed, thus a variance would not be necessary. Schroeder agreed there Is significant hardship In that he has owned the property since 1958, and the proposed residence will be setback consistent with the neighbors. He added there Is an artificiality about the entire creek. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend approval of Application #1792, Don Gronberg, 110 Leaf Street, for a lot area variance and shoreland setback to construct a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#7) #1793 TIM JOHNSON, 627 NORTH FERNDALE ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 8:20 - 9:00 P.M. The Affidavit of Publlcat I on and Certificate of Mai I Ing were noted. Tim Johnson and Merle Friesen of Otten Brothers were pre*ent. Chair Bellows read a letter from Joe Thomas, 62S North Ferndalo Road, Indicating his approve! of the project. Chair Bellows noted that the opinions submitted by the unlicensed landscape architect has no validity. Mabusth reviewed the drainage patterns of the area. She noted a Conservation and Flowage Easement was taken over the wetland area on the Johns^'n property during the 1981 subdivision of the property. In the fall of 1992, staff discovered work crews dredging up soils In the area to determine If a pond was feasible. She noted recent paving changes In private road to the north had Intensified drainagt down the shared lot line area and had endangered an adjacent mound system on property at 929 North Ferndale Road. She Indicated the property Is severely limited with regard to septic expansion. She said staff could not recommend approval of any pond north of the drainage easement line In order to protect and preserve the alternate septic site. I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1793 - CONT. Friesen explained the bermed areas around the pond are to be filled from the spoils removed from the pond area. He said they hope to alleviate the flooding problems In the area with this pond. The applicant noted the swale was necessary to move the water from the front of the house to the rear. He felt the Installation of the pond would enhance the usability of his back yard as In the spring It Is very wet. He contended that the pond on the Bast I an property to the east has never overflowed Into his wetland area. He explained that during the spring the drainage through his property to the Daniels’ property flows ver." fast. He felt the Installation of the pond would preserve that flowage without causing additional probIems. Chair Bellows noted the Conservation and Flowage Easement, which was filed In the chain of -Itle for the property, states very clearly that no trees, shrubs, or vegetation shall be removed, no dirt shall be moved, etc. She suggested the Easement was approved to protect the property from improvements such as what Is proposed. She indicated the City Engineer feels this Improvement is not necessary to alleviate the drainage problems claimed In appiIcation involving flooding of basomsnt arsas. Weckman explained the need for an alternate septic site and the restrictions that apply to that site, including the requirement that the site be setback 76’ from any body of water. Cliff Otten felt that If the pond were redesigned, the setbacks couId be met. Schroeder said the only way they could approve such a proposal would be If the applicant could prove that the Improvement would provide for the betterment of the pond. Cohen noted if the drainage pattern were changed, the pond by his house would virtually disappear. Ho added, Johnson bought the property with these conditions on It, and the easements and requI remen t s were filed In the chain of title. The appi leant noted the drainage ditch outlet to the west over time has lost Its functionality. He expressed concern for his property value. 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1793 - CONT. Chair Bellows suggested: the applicant become familiar with the alternate septic site requirements, have proper hydrology done, and study the effects of the drainage pattern on other properties. She adde-d, historically It Is rare that the Commission would approve the transformation of a natural wetland to a manicured pond. Tim Johnson stated It Is not his Intent to mow the area around the pond. Jeff Johnson stated the applicant needs to study the ramifications of changing the drainage patterns. He questioned the ability to create berms by filling in the wetlands. Mabusth concurred that cannot be done, and noted because of the limited area for septic expansion, berms cannot bo placed anywhere In the rear of the oroperty. Schroeder suggested the applicant review the following: 1) the effects on the alternate septic site; 2) the effects of an altered drainage pattern; and 3) any Improvement that Is consistent with the wetlands currently in place. Cohen no<"ed Orono Is geared to protect the natural habitat and environment. Chair Bellows stated she does not consider a drainage easement a handicap or hardship. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Chair Bellows, to table Application #1793 for Tim Johnson, 627 North Ferndale Road, to allow the applicant time to revise his proposal. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#8) #1795 LUANN WALTERS, 3800 WAYZATA BLVD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 9:10 P.M. The Affidavit of Pubi I cat Ion and Certificate of Mai I I ng were noted. LuAnn Waiters and Cliff Otten were present. Mabusth explained there Is a need to protect the future drainfield areas to Insure adequate expansion room should the day care expand. She noted the sprinkler system will require a new well. She referred to the Engineer’s recommendations regarding the parking plan, Including the moving of the entrance drive on County Road 6 further to the east. It Is suggested the applicant obtain an updated permit from the County. MINUTES OF THF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1795 - CONT. Walters said she has enjoyed worklro with everyone on staff at the City. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of AppII cat Ion #1795 for LuAnn WaI tens, 3800 Wayzata BouIevard, for a conditional permit to allow a day care/school use, subject to conditions #1 through 7 included in the staff memo. Schroeder a^ked if the septic site will be adequate for the expansion. Weckman stated additional testing will be necessary. Walters Inquired If she could have two signs on the property. Cohen amended his motion to Include approval of two signs, not to exceed 12 s.f. in either sign. Johnson seconded that amendment. JoEllen Hurr Inquired about the catering aspect. Walters stated it would be limited to those affiliated with the day care, and would be available on a pre-order basis. She noted this would Inilude either breakfast for the parent on his/her way to work, or dinner for the entire family to be picked up along with the child at the end of the day. Schroeder asked about the necessary license for that aspect. Walters said she would need a licensed catering kitchen, which Is also necessary for the day care. Cohen inquired if they will be collecting money for such service, or .harge to accounts. Walters felt It would be better to use a meal ticket and either bill or have parents pre-pa»'. Mabusth noted Weckman has reviewed the septic system formulas for such use and does not find a problem. Chair Bellows suggested that staff revoke approval of the catering portion of the conditional ^se permit if it Is felt that It Is adding an undue strain on the septic system. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 (#9) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE There was nc report. («10) OTHER ISSUES Chair Bel I ows congratu I ated Mayor Ed Ca N ahan on his new position. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Cohen, to recognize the splendid Job Charlie Kelley did on the Planning Commission. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#11) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Schroeder, approve the minutes of the November 16, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#12) REPRESENTATIVE TO THE COUNCIL MEETING Edward Cohen volunteered to attend the meeting February 8, 1993 CouncI I meet Ing. ADJOURNMENT Chair Bellows adjourned the regular Planning Commission meeting at 9:20 p.m. Maureen Bellows, Chair Parson CL aucju ^^ lloffib ocl^eMievi Tijc _____ JANUARY MTWTFS SMTWTFS SEPTEMBER SMTWTFS 2 3 A 5 6 7 8 9 10 P12 13 14 15 16 17X©20 21 22 23 24 is 26 27 28 29 30 31 FEBRUARY 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 © 17 18 19 20 .23 24 25 26 27 MARCH 3 4 53 4 5 6 7 IB 3 10 11 12 13 14aS»16 17 18 19 20 21\^23 24 25 26 27 23 23 30 31 2 ® A 5 6 7 8 9 Mil 12 13 14 15 16®W19 20 21 22 23 “P a 26 27 28 29 30^3^ 1 So*oex-~&^oA;tb ^ A 1 2 3 4 5 XA 8 9 10 11 1212114 15 16 17 18 19® 21 22 23 24 25 261® 28 29 30 6 13 20 27' mmm W:l JUNE A 2 3 4 J 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 JULY * 1 2 4 XA 7 8 9 11 ©13 14 15 16 18Q120 21 22 23 24 25®27 28 29 30 31 3 10 17 UCCTiOW □CTDBER 3 10 17 24 31 m 12 _ 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 APRIL 4 11 18 m m 6 7 13 14 20 21 27 28 1 2 3 8 9 10 15 16 17 22 23 24 '30 1 8 15 22 AUGUST A 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 24 25 26 27 28 IH Will 29 30 31 NOVEMBER 2 3 4 5 6 9 lOJk’n 13 140516 17 18 19 20 2112S 23 24 27 23 29 30 7 ^ DECEMBER '12 3 4 5 A 7 8 9 10 11 1211214 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 X25 26 ar 28 29 30 Adopted 11/23/92 Amended 12/14/92 Amended 01/25/93 1993 OROflO CITY riEETIflG SCHEDULE KEY d.7:3 0 P.M. Co'.ir.cil Meeting 2nd & 4th Monday O 7;00 P.M. Planning Commission 3rd Monday (May through October 1st Monday as an alternate date) 7:00 P.M. Park Commissicn X Official Holiday I Ml/^^ CABLEVISON 1504 2nd St. S.E.. P.O. Box 110. Waseca. MN 56093 507/835-5975 FAX 507-835-4567 November 30, 1992 Mayor Barbara J. Peterson Orono City Hall Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Peterson and Council Members: Effective January 1, 1993, the monthly rate for Basic cable service will remain at $14.69 and Expanded Basic service will be adjuste-i to $8.30 for a combined total of $22.99 per month. In addition, the monthly rate for Showtime will be adjusted to $11.99 and the 1st additional outlet will be $3.95 per month. The House Rate, which allows you to have up to 4 additio.nal outlets, will remain at $4.95 per month. Triax Cablevision strives to keep cable cost reasonable while providing quality pictures and prompt, courteous service. If you have any questions or comments about your cable service, please write or call our office. We welcome your comments and appreciate the opportunity to serve you. Regional Manager DEC 3 i09? f s. To: From: Date: Re: Memorandum TH 12 fechnical. Citizen's, and Policy Committees Valerie Reinaas Mn/DOT Project Manager January 25, 1993 TH 12 Committee Meeting Notice fJAN' 2 (ft 1993 wa CTYnt CRC.VJ ffD This memo is to notify you that the TH 12 Committees will be meeting in March, 1993, as follows: Technical Committee: 2:00 p.m., March 2\ 1993 - PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE (Delano City Hall) Citizen's Committee: 4:00 p.m., March 2, 1993 (Maple Plain City Hall) Policy Committee: 5:30 p.m., March 3, 1993 (Maple Plain City Hall -- PLEASE NOTE LOCATION CHANGE) In February, you will be receiving an agenda and copy of the signed TH 12 Corridor Scoping Decision document. Please mark your calendar and plan on attending your respective committee meeting. cc: Cities of: Delano Independence Long Lake Maple Plain Medina Orono Wayzata Franklin Township Uatmtgt ntcyth 1 ^acp