The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-25-1993 Council PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25. 1993 ROLL Th« Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Callahan, CouncIImembers Charles Kelley, JoEllen Hurr, and Gabriel Jabbour. J. DIann Goetten was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building I Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. Mayor Callahan recognized the Finance Department for the Certificate of Achievement for Financial Reporting. He commanded them on the fine Job. Mayor Callahan referred to a letter he received from a citizen recognizing the fine service by Officer Curt Erickson the night of the ice storm. He reported Erickson went out of hi« way to help the gentleman after his car had partially slid off the road. He commended him for the fine Job. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA H'irr removed Items #2, 18 and 19. Jabbour removed Item es. Mayor Callahan added Item i7. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda as a'^ended. Ayes A, nays 0. Motions: for all I terns adopted by consent agenda will be Includedi In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Hurr asked that Page 2, 1st paragraph be corrected to read: “less likely to happen**; end Page 3 changed to read “J. Olann Goetten left the Council Chambers". It was moved by Hurr, secorded by Mayor Callahan, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on January 11, 1993. Ayes 3, nays 0. Jabbour abstained. It was BMved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Ceiiehen, to approve the minutes of the special meeting of the Council held on January 4, 1993. Ayes 4, neyt 0. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS (•4) ORONO BASEBALL ASSOCIATION LEASE - BEDERWOOD PARK It was movad by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to table action on the OBA lease of Bederwood Park until the February 22nd meet Ing. Hurr Inquired about the background of such. Mayor Callahan reviewed the history of the lease. He noted the Park Commission has supervised and annually reviewed the use of the park. Hurr said she supported the Park Commission’s recofwnendatIon and felt since the park has been improved, it should continue to be used. Jabbour suggested she review the original contract. Vote: Ayes 4, nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Hurr reported the "Save the Lake Dinner" will be held February 11th. She stated the LMCD is seeking input from Orono regarding the use of polystyrene floating structures. The Environment Committee is reviewing the Trunk Highway 101 Gray’s Bay bridge replacement issue. An Administrative Committee is reviewing finances, staggering terms for Directors and alternating performance reviews. Mayor Callahan felt they may not have the Statutory authority to stagger terms of Directors. Jabbour said while the Council Is awaiting receipt of the City Attorney’e opinion regarding whether the City Is forced to continue financial support to the LMCD, the Council should consider the next steps. He reiterated they are not sanding funding or a representative until that opinion is received, and felt the entire Issue should not be voted on until a full Council is present. (i4A) DNR MAXWELL BAY ACCESS PROPOSAL It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to continue discussion on the DNR Maxwell Bay access proposal to the January 26, 1993 work seeelon beginning at 6:00 p.m. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 PUBLIC COMMENTS Don Germanson, President of the Lake Minnetonka Land Owners Association, thanked the Council for Its continued effort in working toward a good relationship. He noted he was In favor of the staggered terms for the LMCD Board Directors because this will allow for a faster turnover In the coming years, and perhaps some changes on the Board. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (•5) «1778/i1779 ANDREW GOETTEN, 1305 FOX STREET - REVISED VARIANCE & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - SPECIAL LOT COMBINATION It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to table Application #1778 & #1779 for Andrew Goetten of 1385 Fox Street, at the request of the applicant, for two weeks. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#6) LMCD PROPOSED FOAM FLOTATION ORDINANCE Gaffron reviewed the three changes from Orono’s adopted Ordinance to the LMCD proposed Ordinance: 1) extension of the elimination date to April 15, 1995; 2) rearranged sections; and 3) discontinued use of flotation buoys by 1997. Kelley asked if this was initiated because of the ordinance Orono adopted. Hurr felt the LMCD would probably have done something, but It would have taken longer. Jabbour said the LMCD was reluctant to do anything regarding this issue at this time. Mayor Callahan indicated there appear to be no specific comments OT this proposal to be related to the LMCD. (••7) CITY OF VICTORIA FLEXIBILITY REQUEST It was mcvsd by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to accept the shoreland fiexibiIity request of the City of Victoria. Ayes 4, nays 0. (S0) REVISED SUBMITTAL TO MET COUNCIL - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT t3 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to accept the revised submittal on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3, and direct staff to submit to the Metropolitan Council. Ayes 4, nays 0. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 (•9) APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION - MR. A MRS. BARRY O’ROURKE. 2300 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH Mr. and Mrs. O’Rourke were present. Mabusth explained the administrative appeal to the etaff polIcy was Initiated when the O’Rourkes were informed at tne time of Issuance of the building permit for their residence that the permit for the barn could not be issued until the property contained a principal res Idence. Mrs. O’Rourke added this is primarily an economic Issue and explained the cost of the residence and barn will be greatly reduced if they both can be done together during the winter months. She explained she raises valuable horses and has no Intention of leaving them unattended on the property. Moorse stated it was suggested a contract be signed by the owners agreeing to staggering construction. Mabusth noted the BuiIding Inspector feels that would be impossible for the building staff to police the construction of both at the same time. Hurr stated she does not object since the building permit for the residence has been Issued. She said a signed contract should be submitted to the City. Kelley asked If the owners had any Intention to move the horses to the property prior to the house being completed. He asked where the horses are currently being boarded. Mrs. O’Rourke said she has no Intention of moving the horses prior to the house completion and stated the horses are being boarded outside of Maple Plain. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to grant the appeal of administrative decision for Mr. and Mrs. Barry O’Rourke, 2300 Sixth Avenue North, subject to an agreeable contract signed by the owners of the property. Ayes 4, nays 0. Hurr suggested the owners pay the additional legai fees Incurred by the City In the reviewing of the contract. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Mayor Callahan referred to the request for the Council to adopt a resolution declaring Volunteers for America Week. Moors® noted that will be brought to the next meeting. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 1993 APPOINTMENTS « CONT. Mayor Callahan asked that Moorse report on what the Coalition does. Moorse reported MnDot has asked that appointments be made to the Highway 12 Policy Committee to allow that Committee to review the Scoping Document. Mayor Callahan reported he umlerstood the document Is at the printers and wi I I be delIvered In about 10 days. He understood MnDot would like appointments to all three committees for the purposes of reviewing the Scoping Document. MnDot may require new committees after that review. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to appoint those listed In Resolution #3227 to theCItlzei.s Committee, subject to their willingness to serve; to appoint Mayor Callahan as head of the Policy Committee, with Goetten as alternate along with Gerhardson; and to appoint to the Technical Committee, Jabbour and Kelley. Ayes 4, nays 0. Mayor Callahan suggested Moorse make it a polIcy whenever possible, to attend ail Committee meetings regarding Highway 12. Jabbour asKed that the Council be provided with upcoming meetings. a calendar of (#11) CIGARETTE ORDINANCE REVIEW Moorse referred to Information reviewing past occurrences leading to the current ordinance. Mayor Callahan noted the Police Department recommends maintaining the ordinance as Is. Kelley felt this Is an example of over regulation by the City. Hurr asked If the City wants to make a statement about smoking, wny the Orono Golf Course sells cigarettes. She felt the liquor establishment should bs allowed the use of the cigarette machine, but suggested It be moved to allow supervision. She stated she nas no problem allowing the use of a cigarette machines In liquor estabiIshments where the legal age Is greater than or equal to that required to purchase cigarettes. Jabbour stated the change to the ordinance would only affect one establishment. Me did not feel selling cigarettes from behind the counter Is that InconvenIent. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. B) Hur' InquIred about the policy on opening others malI. She asked that her mail be delivered unopened. She felt that citizens should be allowed to contact their representatives privately. C) Kelley questioned the renovation work being done at 3800 Wayzata Boulevard. Mabusth expialned a permit was Issued to repair the roof, which sustained major damage. She noted the Council will be reviewing, In an upcoming meeting, a proposal for a day care center at the IocatIon. D) Jattour asked If staff reviewed the burning permit policy. Mabusth reported that the policy has been changed. Jabbour felt the Council should consider a fee for such permits to compensate for staff time. E) Mayor Callahan noted that the City receives many Invitatirns to meetings being held. He suggested they adopt a policy dirveting Council to take official action as to whether or not s«3neone representing the City should attend. ENGINEER’S REPORT There was no report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (•10) 1993 APPOINTMENTS - RESOLUTION f3227 Moorse explained the Building and Zoning Administrator has determined the Building Code Board of Appeals Is required by Statute. All members have been contacted and expressed a desire to be reappointed. It was fnoved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to appoint to the Building Code Board of Appeals the parsons listed In Resolution •3227. Ayes 4, nays 0. Moorse ’‘sported Barb Peterson wishes to fulfill her term on the North Tonka Crime Coalition, Nc action is required as the term Is in place. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 26, 1993 1993 APPOINTMENTS - CONT. Mayor Callahan asked that Moorse report Oi what the Coalition does. Moorse reported MnDot has asked that appointments be made to the Highway 12 Policy Committee to allow that Committee to review the Scoping Document. Mayor Callahan reported he understood the document is at the printers and will be delivered In about i0 days, he understood MnDot would like appointments to all three committees tor the purposes of reviewing the Scoping Document. MnDot may require new committees after that review. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to appoint those listed In Resolution #3227 to the Cl 11zens Committee, subject to their willingness to serve; to appoint Mayor Callahan as head of the Policy Committee, with Goetten as alternate along with Gerhardson; and to appoint to the Technical Committee, Jabbour and Kelley. Ayes 4, nays 0. Mayor Callahan suggested Moorse make It a policy whenever possible, to attend all Committee meetings regarding Highway 12. Jabbour asked that the Council be provided with upcoming meetings. a calendar of (#11) CIGARETTE ORDINANCE REVIEW Moorse referred to Information reviewing past occurrences leading to the current ordinance. Mayor Callahan noted thi Police Department recommends maintaining the ordinance as Is. Kelley felt this Is an example of over regulation by the City. Hurr asked If the City wants to make a statement about smoking, why the Orcno Golf Course sells cigarettes. She felt the liquor establishment should be allowed the use of the cigarette machine, but suggested It be moved to allow supervision. She stated she has no problem allowing the use of a cigarette machines In estabI Ishments where the legal age Is greater than or equal to that required to purchase cigarettes. Jabbour stated the change to the ordinance would only affect one establishment. He did not feel selling cigarettes from behind the counter Is that Inconvenient. I e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELP JANUARY 25, 1993 CIGARETTE ORDINANCE REVIEW - CONT. Mayor Callahan directed staff to draft the appropriate ordinance amendment for Council review. He asked that the Police Department express their views on the change at that meeting. (#12) FACILITIES CHANGE ORDERS Moorse reviewed the three change orders, presented In the memo. 1) Mechanical contract - decrease In amount; 2) Hoffer s Inc. which the largest portion Is for a new door, to be paid by the masonry cor,!ractor as an error was made In the size of the opening; and 3) Jansco Caulking which the first portion Is related to moisture getting ♦r.rougn to the roof prior to the roof Instal lot lOn, The Architect afid Construction Manager are reviewing to determine whch contractor is responsible. The second portion Is for the Public Works building, and which was overlooked In the bid process. Jabbour asked about the report on the Architect’s relmburseables and the kennel cost. Moorse explained he has a I 1st of approximately 6 Items concerning In which the City Is In dispute with the various subcontractors, lutalllng approximately $20,000, not Including the relmburseables. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to approve the three change orders as presented. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#13) CITY HALL & PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS APPLICATION & CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT #11 Moorse noted all requests are within the change orders or budget updates. Hurr asked If the construction manager has been paid In full. Moorse noted the last payment has been withheld because of unresolved Issues. He noted the architect has volunteered to pay the difference between the reimbursable amount and the overpayment. He suggested not settling for that amount, but rather review the relmburseables and overpayment and determine the amount of refund owed the City. Mayor Callahan asked when the Police Department will •ove In. Moorse indicated they plan to be In by February 11th. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT #11 - CONT. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to approve Certificate of Payment #11 for the City Hall and Public Works Buildings In the amount o,f $258,911.68, as presented. Ayes 4, nays 0. Moorse referred to the Information provided regarding the fuel system project. He noted Pump and Meter has reduced their cancellation cost to only expenses Incurred by them. He suggested the Council offer an amount less than what they propose. Jabbour noted he has been In contact with them, and up front, asked them not to hide the cancellation cost In the cost for the above ground tanks as Council desires to be aware of all costs. He reported Pump and Meter has done Just that and said the Council should respect them for that. He said Pump and Meter did Incur some engineering costs and should be reimbursed for such. Mayor Callahan suggested Moorse try to negotiate a lower amount, but If that is not possible, he did not object to paying the amount requested. He commended Moorse on his efforts to try and save the Clty money. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to authorize staff to pay up to $2,182 for a cancellation fee to Pump and Meter in conjunction with the order for the above ground tanks. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•14) ESTABLISH DATE FOR 1993 BOARD OF REVIEW It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to establish the 1993 Board of Review for April 29, 1993. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•IS) QROUrO) WATER PLAN Moorse explained staff has reviewed Hennepin County Board of Commissioners’ ground water plan. The following are areas of concern: 1) well head protection - the plan promotes rules and regulations currently enforced by the State of Minnesota; and 2) the plan cal Is for a County-wide joint powers, leaving Orono as one small voice among many. He added, the plan provides good information and suggested cities could be better served if the county would provide technical service and information. Kelley suggested th§ Council write a telter to their Commlssloner stating their opposition. He felt this Is a clear examole of over reguiat I on MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 GROUND WATER PLAN - CONT. Mayor Callahan directed staff to prepare objections to the plan. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, directing staff to formally object to the plan in accordance with the schedule. Ayes 4, nays 0. Mayor Callahan felt it would be appropriate to inform the City of Minnetonka of the action being taken and thank them for the update. Kelley noted the ground water problems are not Just In Hennepin County, but rather are State-wide. Mayor Callahan stated he would write a letter of objection to the County Commissioner. Qaffron noted the DNR Technical Committee, at its last meeting, was presented with Information on storm water m<’?ent. Mayor Callahan felt It difficult keeping track of various groups all monitoring the same thing. (•16) CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN FINANCIAL REPORTING It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, congratulating Finance Director Tom Kuehn and the financial staff for the City's obtaining the G.F.O.A. Certificate of Achievement for Excellence In Financial Reporting for the 1991 Comprehensive Annual Finance Report; and acknowledges the valuable assistance provided by the audit staff of Malloy, Karnowskl, Radosevlch and Company. Ayes 4, nays 0 (•17) EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE Moorse explained Excess Liability Insurance allows the City to exceed the State Statutory limit of $600,000 to $2,000,000 for all claims within those limits. Federal or Civil rights case would be outside those limits and therefore do not have any limit set The Waiver of Liability Limits a I lows the City to voluntarily waive the Statutory l^nlt of $600,000 for all claims up to $2,000,000. He explained if there were an accident Involving a City employee and several citizens, the $600,000 limit would be divided among all citizens Injured unless that limit is waived. Kelley asked ths additional cost to waive the limits. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE - CONT. Moorse Indicated It would cost the City an additional $8,492 to waive the limits, plus the additional $22,587 for the excess liability insurance. Kelley clarified this amount does not Include the cost for the Insurance up to the $600,000 limit. Kelley asked staff to provide an entire list of Insurance policies carried by the City. Mayor Callahan suggested they wait to make a decision until all Information is provided. He asked that staff review the financial responsibility of the Insurance companies that the City uses. Moorse clarified that the Council has adopted a resolution waiving the limits, this is merely presented for Information. Jabbour suggested staff provide the Information and Council review for the upcoming year. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Mayor Callahan suggested the> review the claim for re ibursement for 1580 Bohns Point Road. Moorse explained this issue relates to two sewer backups at the property. After th*» firct backup, the City proceeded to repair the Lift Station. However, a temporary pump did not hold and a second backup occurred at the residence. The property owner then Installed Items In the house to prevent It from happening again. The Insurance company will not pay the cost of these items. The City is asked to pay for the additional Items installed at the residence. Jabbour referred to one Council member in the past who had sinifar problems and installed items such as installed at this property, and the Council at the time choose not to pay any of the additional cost. Hurr felt the homeowner should be ralmbursed for the additional cost. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to authorize •taff to reimburse the property owner of 1580 Bohns Point Road for items Installed at his residence to eliminate future d^age from sewer backups. Ayes 4, nays 0. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 ATTORNEY’S REPORT - CONT. Mayor Callahan referred to the issue between the Jeromes end the Lindeils, v^hose properties Me on either side of the fire lane on County Road 6M He referenced their claim of suffering from Hlegai activities by snowmobiiers and owners of ice houses using that fire lane. He said the Council must do their best to pro'<<^c;t the citizens of Orono in their own hofnes« and discourage the f legal activity reported. Jabbour noted the issue has come up several times in the past, ano It was determined by Bruua Matkerson, City Attorney at the time, that the fire lane could not be vacated. (ff18) LICENSES It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley, to approve the Mcenses, but to deny the cigarette license for Orono Golf Course. Hurr felt a City>owned facility should not sail cigarettes. Moorse indicated the purpose of the current ordinance is to prevent minors from starting the habit. Gerhardson asked that Council table the license to allow staff time to review the Impact. Hurr revised her motion to approve the following licenses, tabling the cigarette license for Orono Golf Course. Kelley seconded the motion. Cigarette Licenses: LeRoy Koehnen, Navarre Amoco Richard Keaveny, Keaveny’s Navarre Drug Steven Corl, Navarre Liquor’s Inc. James Q. Holtz, Jimmie’s Inc. Michael J. Mehner, Crystal BAy Service William W. Wear, Orono Shopping Center Richard Bloomquist, Ricks Super Valu On-Sale Non-IntoiI cating Halt Liquor: Grant R. Wenkstern, Lake View Golf Course Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 (§19) BILLS Hurr Inquired about the legal retainer Included In the bills. Moorse noted this basically la for the attendance at Council meetings. Mayor Callahan suggested staff review the legal bills. Kelley asked that Council be provided with Information on City expenditures versus the budgeted amounts. Moorse stated that could be dona quarterly. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Kelley, payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. to approve OTHER Moorse presented the Council with the proposed 1993/1994 Police contract. He noted the 1993 and 1994 wages and Insurance Increase amounts will Increase by 2.75* and $20.00 per month respectively In each of the two years. Hurr asked If the Police Department receives the same health Insurance benefits as other City employees, and asked how their wages fit into comparable worth. Mocrse Indicated the Police Department receives the same amount fo. health Insurance as all City employees, however unlike other Clt^ employees, the Police Department is allowed to use excess dollars toward other types of Insurance. He noted the Information relating to comparable worth has been presented to the State to ba processed, and at this time he has not heard anything. He added the current formula does not allow one to determine compliance without the aid of software and knowledge of such. Jabbour questioned If the Police Department receives a $20.00 Increase for health benefits, wouldn’t all employees be entitled to such. ikMrse stated there are ways to equalize employee benefits without actually Increasing all at the same time. Hurr felt it was unfair to pay people more because of their marital status. She felt this only encourages union!zation. Mayor Caliahen suggested thev deal with this contract separately and later review the equitable factors with regard to all employees. HINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 25, 1993 OTHER - CONT. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to accept the 1993/1994 Police contract as presented. Ayes 4, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned the regular Orono City Council meeting at 10:23 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 4, nays 0. ATT^^St: 'Ml.J I ^oF^hy Edward J. (^Klahan, Jr., i^yov alI in, City Clerk f s I I AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 25, 1993, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be r^nacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of January 11, 1993 * 3. Special Meeting of January 4, 1993 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS 4. Orono Baseball Association Lease - Bederwood Park LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - JoEllen Hurr Representative 4A. DNR Maxwell Bay Access Proposal PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ** applicants **Immediately a'*ter the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. ^ » 5 «1778/#1779 Andrew Goetten, 1?85 Fox Street Revised Variance and Preliminary Plat - Resolutions - Special Lot Combination--«.^5«.«:»j LMCD Proposed Foam Flotation Ordinance 7. City Victoria Flexibility Request ^ ui . 8. Revi.ed submittal to Met Counci.. - 9. Appeal of Administrative Decision - Mr, and Mrs. Barry O Rourke, 2300 Sixth Avenue North 6 7 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 10. 1993 Appointments - Resolution Cigarette Ordinance Review City^Hail*and*"pJTbf^^^ Buildings Application & Certificate o£ Payment No. 11 11 12 13 1 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JA^"7ARY 25, 1993, 7:30 P.l^ ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWaY. 0ROi,J, MINNESOTA CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued 14. Establish Date for 1993 Board of Review 15. Ground Water Plan 16. Certificate of Achievement in Financial Repor 17. Excess Liability Insurance Coverage ing CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (18*) BILLS (19*) •• ADJOURIIMENT information items included IN COU?JCIL PACKET UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 01/25 Council Meeting 7:J0 p.m. 02/01 Park Commission Meeting 7:0C p.m. 02/08 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. 02/13 Monday Holiday - Presidents' Day 02/16 Planning Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. Tuesday 02/22 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. 0 ?l.inni.-iq Conir.i'^s icn Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE / PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOV/ FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JAJIUARY 11, 1993, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA * * ' V * >Asterisk itens are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council ui:der the Consent Item* on the aaenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL OATH OF OFFICE 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OP MINUTES 2. Regular Meeting of December 14, 1992 LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ** APPLICANTS ♦*Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the thre*^ (3) origix.al resolutions at the Recorder's deslr. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 5 6 ()1764 Austin Evans - Final Plat Resolution, 255 Landmark Drive - Resolution #1770/#1779 Andrew Go<»tten, 1385 Fox Street - Preliminary Plat Aporoval/Variance - KQSo’LxxXLZ.ons'^SSc/9b. Joint Use Dock License - Gage/Nelson/Carlscn - Resolution Set Lake Use Committee Meeting Date 7. Shoreland Flexibility Request - City of Minnetonka MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 8. Park Commission Liaison Schedule 1 ENGINEER REPORT Resolution 7. Preparation of Plans and Specs for Old Crystal Bay Road Bike Trail lO. Pay Request #1 Final - Topographic Mapping CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 11. 1993 Appointments - Resolution Ordinance Amendment - Park Commission Members ^ Establish 1993 Board of Review Date Demolition Costs Old Facilities - Crystal Bay Annual Purchase of New Squad Cars Oronc School Liaison Officer 12 13 14 15 16 an* AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEE''’ING SET FOR MOIIDAY, JANUARY 11, 1993, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA r CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued 17. New City Facilities Budget Update 18. Facilities Change Orders 19. Future Work Session Topics CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (20*) BILLS (21*) adjournment INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 01/11 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. 01/lb Monday Holiday - Martin Luther King Jr's Birthday Observance 01/19 Planning Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. Tuesday 01/25 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. 02/01 Park Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. 02/08 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. 02/15 Monday Holiday - Presidents' Day 02/16 Planning Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. Tuesday 02/22 Council Meeting 7:30 p.m. ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 1 1, 1993 W6 ROLL cnvoF 5 ;39J NOIII The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Callahan, CounciI members J. Diann Goetten, Charles Kelley and JoEllen Hurr. Gabriel Jabbour was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Finance Director Tom Kuehn, City Clerk Dorothy Hal I in, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Police Chief Stephen Sullivan, City Attorneys Thomas Barrett and Kevin Stove, City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Recorder Teri Naab. Chariie Schroeder was present to represent the Planning Commission. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. OATH OF OFFICE Hal I in adminIstered the Oath of Office to Mayor Edward Cal Iahan and CounciI members JoEllen Hurr and Charles Kelley. Mayor Callahan, on behalf of himself and the Council, offeredi condolences to Gabriel Jabbour because of the death of his father. Barrett Introduced Kevin Stone, an associate w*tn Popham, Haik. Barrett explained Mr. Stone wiI I be attending ihe CounciI meetings In the future, but he will retain the position ot lead attorney. Mayor Callahan welcomed the new Council members and explained to the audience the CounciI does not intend any major changes in the coming years. He announced al I CounciI members are wiI IIng to discuss issues with all citizens. (i1) CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Callahan added Item #10. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, ''ays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be included In the m'nutes in their respective numerical order, (•2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Council held on December 14, 1992. Ayes 3, nays 0. Hurr abstained. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT There was no report. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jimmie Holtz, owner of Jimmies Loun^s. asked the Council to reconsider allowing bars to maintain cigarette vending machines. He stated the change In this ordinance is a hardship to him. He added people must be 21 to drink In a bar, and therefore the chance of a sale of cigarettes to minors is less likely In this happen. Mayor Callahan felt it would be appropriate for the Administrator and Chief of Police to review the reasons discussion regarding the change in the ordinance. City and Goetten felt they should not consider changing the ordinance because of health consequences. She reported due to the sting operation by the Orono Pol ice Department, the Long Lake Counci I has abolished the sale of cigarettes. Kelley stated he would consider the request. Hurr said due to the fact that underaged people do not frequent an establishment such as Mr. Holtz’s, the Council should consider the request. Mayor Callahan directed the City Administrator and Police Chief to review the background of the change In the ordinance and make a recommendatI on to the Council. Hurr asked that the Council be provided with a copy of the past and current ordinance. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (§3) #1674 AUSTIN EVANS, 255 LANDMARK DRIVE - FINAL PLAT ~ RESOLUTION #3222 Austin Evans was present. Qaffron explained the applicant has met preliminary plat approval, and will pay prior to the filing of the plat. ail the requirements of the park dedication fee It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3222, Application #1874, Austin Evans, 255 Landmark Drive, approving the plat of Bayside Landing Second Addition. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 («4) lM778/i1779 ANDREW GOETTEN, 1385 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL/VARIANCE RESOLUTIONS #3223 & #322^ Paul Larson, applicant’s attorney, was present. J. DIann Goettcn abstained from discussion of this item. Gaffron explained the applicant has requested a revision of the preliminary plat, eliminating the need for a side setback variance for the existing garage on Lot 2 by moving the lot line westward and combining the riparian outlot with Lot 1 to maintain ih acres for the newly created lot. » 2 Anderson explained his cl lent requests this revision to allow for more flexibility with respect to the lot line between Lots 1 and 2. This would also allow for an option to move the garage If the existing road were to be expanded. Mayor Callahar asked the degree of change In the lot line. Gaffron noted it would be moved approximately .02 of an acre, the exact amount of acreage in the outlot less the easement for Orono Lane. Kelley reiterated the Planning Commission denied this application and felt the property should be rezoned. He stated he would maintain that position. Hurr felt there was value In tying the outlot with anoiher lot so It would not be sold later as riparian access. Kelley stated Lot 1 should have 2 acres without the benefit of the outlot. Anderson felt the pfecodent setting issue Is minimal In this situation. Hurr stated the City made a commitment to the Gonttens 10 years ago, and she felt they should uphold that commitment. Gaffron noted a special lot combination would be required If the outlot were combined with either Lot 1 or 2 or sold to any neighboring property. t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 ZONING FILES •1778/«l/79 - CONT. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3224 for AppIication #1778 for Andrew Goetten, 1385 Fox Street, to permit the subdivision of the property into two buildings lots, and amending the resolution to allow the outlot to be combined with Lot 1 and to be used as area credit and allowing the lot line be moved westward as proposed. Mayor Callahan suggested in the second Whereas paragraph, eliminate "one of which. . ." and replace It witn the following; "pursuant to the provisions of Resolution #1778 in order to carry out the purpose and the intention thereof". He suggested a!I the findings on Pages 3. 4, 5, and 6 be eliminated due to the fact that the Council is approving this variance based on a past contract, not on the basis of a hardship. Hurt accepted the amendment. Ayes 2, nays 1. Kelley voted nay because he felt the property should be rezoned. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hurr, to adopt Resolution #3224 for AppIicatIon #1779 for Andrew Goetten, 1385 Fox Street, granting preliminary approval of the plat as presented. Gaffron reviewed that Conditions #3, 10, and 11 will need to be amended to reflect the current proposal. Vote Ayes 2, nays 1. Kelley voted nay. (•5) JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE - GAGE/NELSON/CARLSON RESOLUTION #3226 Robert Bauer. Attorney for the applicants, was present. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Ka*ley, to adopt Resoluticn #3225 approving a 1993 Joint Use Dock License for owners of property located at 460 Tonkawa Road, 50^ Tonkawa Read and 550 Tonkawa Road. Ayes 3, nays 0. Goetten was out of the room at this time. (§6) SET LAKE USE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE This item was deferred. (#7) SHORELANO FLEXIBILITY REQUEST - CITY OF MINNETONKA Mayor Callahan explained the Council has sent a similar response to all cities requesting flexibility with the eicceotlon of Hound and Minnetonka. Goetten and Murr are drafting a response to Mound. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 SHORElAND FLEXIBILITY REQUEST - CONT. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley, to direct staff to draft a response to the flexibility request of the City of Minnetonka. Ayes 4, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Mayor Callahan reported he attended a breakfast hosted by the LMCD for the 14 mayors, at which they explained accomplishments, the forthcoming budget, the Lake Access Task Force, and the miIfoiI problem and the difficulties encountered in the remedies. B) Mayor Callahan referred to a letter from the City of Minnetonka concerning Hennepin County’s group <ater plan. Moorse stated he has solicited comments from surrounding communities. The larger cities seem to feel this Is a duplication of efforts and have relayed their concern to Hennepin County, who will be revisiting the issue and Its implementation at an upcoming meet Ing. Mayor Callahan suggested staff further study the matter. He felt the City should make its feelings known. He noted staff has been monitoring the situation as Steve Weckrrar. has attending the relevant meetings. He asked that the '•eport by Weckman b© recirculated to the Council members. C) Mayor Callahan referred to the letter from Tonka Bay regaraing the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. He felt the City of Orono was experiencing somewhat similar concerns and the matter should be considered during a work session. Moorse reported the larger portion of the Increase is related to the estimation of flow. He noted during the 1900s it was very dry, but since the increase in rain fall, there has been an increase in infiltration and inflow. He said he would provide additional information to the Council to be discussed at a work session. Ci6) PARK COMMISSION LIAISON SCHEDULE There was no action taken on this issue. i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD ,'ANUARY 11, 1993 ENGINEER’S REQUEST (#9) PREPARATION OF PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS FOR OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD BIKE TRAIL - RESOLUTION #3226 Kelley stated he Is not in favor of the trail system if It would destroy the existing vegetation on the east side of the road. He said this vegetation acts as a buffer between the road and the residential properties. He urged them to negotI ate with the Dickeys and the properties owners north of Watertown Road to preserv** as much of the existing vegetation as possible. Cook noted Hennepin Parks has planned as their cost as a part of the project to provide plantings. He stated the areas to be removed are not very good quality trees. Gerhardson noted replacement trees will be shown on the plans. Kelley suggested beginning the trail at the DNR property at Willow Drive and the Luce Line and wind northward through the wooded area owned by the DNR. Mayor Callahan stated he hopes It Is not too late to give credence to what Kelley Is suggesting. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3226 ordering plans and specifications for the Old Crystal Bay Road trail project. Ayes 4, nays 0. («»10) PAY REQUEST #1 FINAL - T0P9CPAPHIC MAPPING It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to authorize payment to Horizons, Inc. in the amount of $43,265.00 for topographic mapping services. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#111 1993 APPOINTMENTS - RESOLUTION Mayor Callahan suggested tabling the appointment of JoEllen Hurr as representative to the LMCO. He added this has nothing to do with Hurr’s performance as representative. He noted, it has been suggested that if the City of Orono were not to be a member of the LMCO, the City may not be liable for the taxes levied by the LMCO. He directed the '‘ ty Attorney to provide an opinion on thi# matter. Kuehn asked if h« should withhold payment of the first quarter fee. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 1993 APPOINTMENTS - CONT. Mayor Callahan stated he hesitates to do so. Hurr suggested that the Attorney’s opinion be provided to the Council by the January 25th meeting, and payment to the LMCD be withheld until that time. Mayor Callahan asked that the legal counsel retain until a contract is negotiated, and suggested appointment at this time. its position tab I i ng tlie Mayor Callahan inquired about the Building Code Board of Appeals. Gaffron explained this group meats as necessary and reacts to challenges by an owner or builder regarding the State Building Code. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to approve all appointments on Page 1 of the proposed resolution with the exception of the representative to the LMCD and all legal counsel. Ayes 4, nays 0. Mayor Callahan suggested the City advertise for volunteers for tne West Tonka Senior Citizens and tha West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board. Mayor Callahan asked that Moorse provide the Council with more Information on the Building Code Board of Appeals. He asked the responsibility of the Development Committee. Moorse said he assumed the committee was responsible for the economic activities of the City. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hurr, to abolish the Development Committee. Ayes 4, nays 0. It was moved by Mayor Callanan, seconded by Hurr, to appoint Ron Moorse and Stephen Sul I Ivan to the Hennepin Emergency CofTMDun i cat i ons Organization, and Stephen Sullivan to the North Tonka Crime prevention. Ayes 4, nays 0. Mayor Callahan asked Moorse to contact Barbara Peterson to Inquire if she still wishes to be on the Nor t h Tonka Crime Prevent I on Committee. He asked If the Highway 12 Comrrittees are still needed. Goetten felt, since MnDot hat abolished those committees, the City could do the same. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 1993 APPOINTMENTS - CONT. Moorse stated when the EIS report Is issued, those conr.mi ttees will be back in operation. Mayor Callahan suggested wait ng until the need arises to make appointments to those committees. Mayor Callahan felt the HRA should desigftate its own vice-chair, but recommended appointing current Council to the KRA. He felt they should not appoint anyone new to the Lake Use Committee, but hoped those on the committee would continue. Mayor Callahan inquired if there are competitors for the official newspaper position. He asked staff to review the publication costs of a daily publication versus a weekly publication. He felt for the time being, they snould appoint the Lake and Pioneer as the official newspaper. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hurr, to appoint the official newspaper and official deposI tories/Investment vendors as listed In the proposed resolution. Ayes 4, nays 0. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, ser^onded by Goetten, to terminate the appointment of Gabriel Jabbour to the LMCD LaKe Avccss T«sk Force and Ron Moorse as alternate. Aves 4, nays 0. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hu^'', to appoint Charles Kelley as the representatIve to the Long Lake Fire Department Joint Commission. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•12) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - PARK COMMIS^ilON MEMBERS ORDINANCE SECOND SERIES It was ir.nved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Ordinance 9 , SerieS: amending Orono Section 2.52, Subdivision 1, changing the membership of the Park Commission from eight to seven members. Ayes 4, nays 0. (•13) ESTABLISH 1993 BOARD OF REVIEW DATE Mayor Callahan directed staff to review alternate dates and report back to him. 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 (#14) DEMOLITION COSTS OLD FACILITIES - CRYSTAL BAY Moorse explained these are estimated quotes to demolition the existing buildings at the former City f^cility site. Gerhardson noted John Schoening would provide the equipment and operator and Blackowiak would provide the container and access to the landfill. He stated the prices are lower due to the time of year. He noted the Weet Hennepin Historical Society has expressed interest in using the Council Chambers and has suggested mov'ng it to the City property on Old Crystal Bay Road. Kelley said he has discussed the buildings r.t the Crystal Bay site with a neighbor who has oppressed concern that the lumber building be removed immediately because of safety reasons. The neighbor has Indicated the neighborhood residents are trying to formulate a plan for the land and will be presenting their thoughts to the Council In the near future. Hurr suggested the Historical Society may wish to move their existing building near the Council Chambers if Highway 12 Is widened In its present location. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hurr, to authorize Staff to remove the existing lumber building as soon as possible, at the cost presented or lower. Ayes 4, nays 0. Hurr suggested that the wood from the lumber building may not be desirable as wood chips due to the paint and nails. She suggested staff consider disposal in a landfill. (#15) annual PURCHASE OF NEW S.^UAO CARS Sullivan submitted additional information to the Council regarding the purchase. He noted the cars to be replaced have very high mileage which increases maintenance costs and becomes a safety factor for the patrol men. He noted the costs presented are very similar to those of last year. Hurr asked how the excess funds from the sale of the vehicles will be used. Sullivan indicated the excess funds will be used for equipment for the new cars and the change over cost of existing equipment. Moorse stated the Department will only use funds that are necessary. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 ANNUAL PURCHASE OF NEW SQUAD CARS - CONT. It vtas> moved Dy Keliey, seconded by Mayor Callalan, to authorize the purchase of three squad cars as budgeted with the bid award under the State of Minnesota Contract #M5179 to Superior Ford for the 1993 Ford Crown Victoria at a total purchase price of $40,896. The 1993 budget amount of $40,000 includes the estimated credit of $10,500 from the sale of three used squads, the change over costs and certain replacement equipments. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#16) ORONO SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER Sullivan explained this program is being proposed to provide a better, more positive communication with the youth of the Community. He felt the program will try to help shape youth into responsible adults. He stated the School District is allowed to fund this type of program through special levies. He recommends the establishment of a special committee to establish an appropriate school liaison program. Goetten asked how this will affect the Orono budget If an officer Is provided to work at the school. Sul I Ivan explained the department wiI I increase in size due to the program, but the total cost of that officer wiI I be funded through the School District, including any cost necessary if the program were terminated. Mayor Callahan noted the intent of the Council to review till departments of the City. He felt it would be premature to go forward with this program prior to that review. SuI Iivan stated he is only asking the Counc il to participate in the needs assessment dialogue committee, wh'ch does not mean they are endorsing the program. He added, the officer In charge could also do necessary work on campus at the same time. Mayor Callahan stated he was not prepared to make any type of commitment with regard to the program until the department was reviewed. Goetten supported the goals of the Department, but wished to postpone her decision. Sullivan asked how they could decide they did not want something If they did not know what that program was about. • • • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER - CONT. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to table any consideration of establishing a school liaison officer program until « future date. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#17) NEW CITY FACILITIES BUDGET UPDATE Moorse reviewed the three tables presented to Council on the updated budget for the City facilities. Hurr questioned the legal fees. Kuehn explained the legal cost in conjunction with the land was approximately $8,000, legal fees related to the construction manager’s contract was $9,000, and approximately $3,200 was spent on title work and clearing up claims against the property. Hurr felt the legal fees involved with the construction manager's contract were excessive. Moorse explained the actual fee paid to Kraus Anderson is approx I mately $209,000, Including over-alI fee, reimburseables, and general expenses. Mayor Callahan stated a considerable amount of time was spent on the contract. Hurr inquired about the engineering fee for the frontage road. Cook stated approximately $17,500 was billed for work on the frontage road, the remainder of the bill was for work on the storm seer or the sewer and water installation. Mayor Callahan suggested staff continue to review the Attorney’s fees. (#18) FACILITIES CHANGE ORDERS Hurr asked if the contractors were going ahead with the stucco work. Gerhardson noted that work is on hold until spring. Mayor Callahan referred to Change Order #8-2 explained In th© memo. He felt the City should not be responsible for this delay or the costs related to such. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1993 FACILITIES CHANGE ORDERS - CONT. It W3b moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to approve the change orders explained in the memo dated 1/7/93. Ayes 4., nays 0. (#19) FUTURE WORK SESSION TOPICS Mayor Callahan suggested he discuss this with Administrator and be a liaison to the Council members. (*«20) LICENSES the City It was moved by Hurr, seconaed by Goetten, to approve the following Iicenses: Residential Kennel Licenses: Jane Kline/Steven Bell, 4455 West Branch Road Willi Foyer & H. Zohara, 565 Hanlon Avenue Maxwell E. Alvord, 960 North Brown Road Off-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor: William W. Wear, Orono Self Service, 2160 Wayzata Blvd Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#21) BILLS It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT to approve payment of Mayor Callahan adjourned the regular Orono City Council meeting at 10:25 p.m. to Executive Session. Ayes 4, nays 0. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 5 % MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETI^fll, HELD JANUARY 4, 1993 s ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Edward Callahan, CounciImembers J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Charles Kelley, and JoEllen Hurr. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, City Clerk Dorothy Hal I in, Finance Director Tom Kuehn, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Jack Boarman, architect, and John Davies, Construction Manager, were also present. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 4:00 P.M. (#1) OATH OF OFFICE Hal I In administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Edward Callahan, and CounciI members Charles Kelley and JoEllen Hurr. (#2) APPOINTMENTS It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hurr, Goetten as Acting Mayor. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#3) DISCUSSION OF BUDGET FOR CITY FACILITIES to appoint Mayor Callahan recalled at the last meet'ng of the Council a number of invoices were submitted for payment, of which, one had since been paid. 4 Moorse concurred and reported it was to Allied Mechanical. Mayor Callahan clarified that the payment to Allied is within the bounds of the contract with Allied, leaves the City with a 10* retainage, and the contract had not been altered from the beginning to the end except fnr a reduction or to oenefit the City. Moorse concurred. Callahan asked if there were a number of other bills with those same characteristics. Moorse stated there were. Jabbour noted tne problem he has with the issue is that on September 28th, the CounciImembers left the meeting with a budget estimate, which since nas been revised and the Council was not apprised of the revisions until specifically asked for. He clarified that currently the Council it asked to authorize payment for work done in November. Davies siateJ that is correct. Goetten asked if security for the Police Department has been reduced. A. MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 4, 1993 Moorse explained the holding cells meet the requirements of a 72 hour holding cell, but a security area and day room would need to be added to use the faciIity as such. He noted the City decided it necessary to have an area to hold persons until Hennepin County could transport them to their facility. He said they do not have a complete facility to hold persons for 72 hours. Boarman clarified that the facilities the Council toured prior to construction are similar to what has been constructed. He stated currently there is not a facility in the metropolitan area that has a holding cell rated for more than 4 to 8 hours. He noted the Inclusion of windows in the cell allows for a longer stay. He Indicated the difference from a 72 hour rated cell from what they currently have is the . d for a day room area and a food service area. He aadcd the more significant reasons for not providing a 72 hour rated cell are insurance, liability and additional staffing needs to service the detainees. He said they could change the facility from the current 4 hour rated cell to a 72 hour rated cell wIthout physically changing the bulIding, but noted they wouId need to add staff to do so. He felt ♦his situation allows for the most efficient use of patrol personnel. Kelley asked the City’s current policy tor holding detainees. Moorse said the City currently holds persons for transfer either by Hennepin County or a CSO officer. Boatman noted the Department of Corrections will spend time with the Police Department prior to occupancy reviewing allowed procedures for usage of the facility. Goetten reiterated she understood from the beginning the facility would be rated for use of up to 72 hours. Boarman suggested staff monitor usage and do a cost comparison in the future to determine the cost of additional personne* versus the transport costs. Goetten thought the Council wanted a longer holding period. Jabbour noted a concern that someone sold the Council on this feature. Mayor Callahan agreed, and recalled the Council was told they would actually make money by allowing surrounding communities to use the facilities. He noted all three Counciimembers agree that Is what they were originally told. I I MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 4, 1993 Boarman noted the 1-3 detention area cost the City an additional $135,000 to $150,000. Mayor Callahan suggested meeting with the PoI ice Chief and indicate to him the need to monitor the economic situation pertaining to the fad I i ty . Kelley askea If it Is to be the policy of the City to allow usage of the facility by other jurisdictions. Mayor CaI Iahan noted that is not the current policy, but understood that the City was actively going to pursue that option. Kelley suggested informing the Pol Ice Chief that the current polIcy is not to allow other communities to use the facilities. Hurr asked how strict the 4 hour regulation is enforced. Boarman stated there may be some flexibility to that rating. Hurr asked what additional expense was incurred to provide a 72 hour faciIity. Boarman noted the only additional cost was for the windows. Hurr asked who signs change orders. Moorse noted they are signed by the Mayor after Council approval. Jabbour indicated he has not heard of any change orders since September 28th. Davies noted they ^^e behind on the paper work dealing with change orders, but all changes have been approved by the Council. He noted the Council will soon u® receiving the documents regarding those. Jabbour felt some change orders have been brought to the Counci I after the work has been done. He suggested staff review with the City Attorney the procedures they are following regarding the responsibility of the HRA Board and the Council. iHurr asked whose obligation it Is to e. sure the contract includes all necessary items. Davies responded it is his responsibility to write the contract to include the scope of the project. He noted in some cases an item may have been omitted from the drawings or there may have been a mt s-interpretation which resulted in change orders, but have not MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEFTING HELD JANUARY 4, 1993 actually cost the City additional as they were never Included in any of the contracts. Mayor Callahan noted there are current'y some disputes regarding invoices submitted, which are being addressed. Jabbour expressed his concern that the building be built to allow the City to function as it deems appropriate and tc get the maximum usage from the building. He added, some items may have been inadvertently forgotten which were later realized. Hurr noted the City has not received all that was included In the original budget. Jabbour explaineu some I terns have been changed or eliminated to stay within the budget. Boarman noted the $43,000 over the budget will pay for everything the Council has approved to date. Mayor Callahan explained when the bonds were sold the City did not have finalized drawings and based the budget on estimate solely. He noted some of those estimated amounts were not accurate. He stated the Counci I has tried to stay within that budget by changing whatever v/as necessary. He felt the Council had established a workable :*ystem to track expenditures and the construction. He noted the City is holding a retainage to pay for any liability of the contractor. Jabbour asked who is paying for the concrete walls for the kennel. Davies explained tha* .* a disputed item with the contractor. Mayor Callahan noted tnt.* large change of amount In the owners’ contingency. Davies indicated the cost of the cold storage buMdirj had been added back into the budget. Mayor Callahan clarified that there have been little changes since September 28th. Davies referred to Exhibits D, E and G, which indicate those changes since the meeting of September 28th. * J Ii MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 4. 1993 Jabbour questioned the light for the salt storage. He noted the original estimate for providing electricity to the cold storage building was near the total amount to run the electricity for one Iight. Davies explained that item includes additional amounts for other electricity provided than what was needed for just the light on the salt storage building. Mayor Callahan noted the contingency available as of September 28th, plus the additions and deletions since then do not amount to the contingency presented to date. He suggested staff and the consultants review the numbers. He asked the dollar amount needed to complete the project. Davie? reported $137,000 has not been contracted for to date, and $639, OO repre!=ents work completed but not yet billed for, and this amount includes a number of things in dispute. Kuehn noted the City has escrowed $400,000 of the bond sale as part of the Indenture in case the City Is unable to make the bond payment. He noted the City did include $190,000 within the budget from the building fund. Davies noted the City Is also sitting on $200,000 for retainage. Ka1(ey and Mayor Callahan indicated the City is short by an amount. Jabbour asked about the corrected construction manager’s fee. Ou’ ies oteu the Finance Director dtsco'^ered the fee had been *« correct y billed. Jabt'^ur a'jfNad about the architect’s re I mbursab I es. Moorse stated they are currently working on that amount. Kelley asked that the contractor provide the CouncIImembers a revised budget, eliminating the cold storage building which has been deferred at this time. Boarman noted there were two Items deferred In September, which ars still deferred, which total $71 ,000. He said the stucco on the Public Works building has not been completed, and it has been determined it will cost more to complete It in the winter months than the damage sustained by waiting for warmer weather. MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 4, 1993 Moorse indicated some of the work had been started and the City will incur some cost for temporary heat. Boarman noted the only other item to be compieted would be additional signage. He offered to present the Council with a proposed budget for the additional signage at no additional cost. He added, the contested items (over the reimbursable amount) amount to $10,000 to $20,000. Mayor Callahan directed staff to submit to the Council a the items that are being contested, and the estimated budget. list o^ signage Hurr asked how much Boarman has received to date for his services. Boarman noted it is approximately $272,000, of which $9,000 will be refunded to the City for incorrect billing of the schematics. Hurr asked about reimbursabIes. the estimated and actual amounts for Boarman explained that part of the additional costs are due to the necessity to reprint the plans three times. He noted the original budget included $3,000 for reimbursabIes end $15,000 for miscellaneous costs, which was transferred to the moving budget. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to author ize staff to disburse the funds for invoices submitted by Kraus Anderson and reviewed and approved by staff and the architect. Ayes 4, nays 0. Hurr abstained. Jabbour asked the status of the amount owed Pump and Meter for cancellation of the underground tanks. Moorse reported they original requested $10,000, but that has been reduced to $2,000. Jabbour noted Pump and Meter had actual design time which they need to be reimbursed for. Moorse indicated the change orders will be reviewed at the next CounciI meeting. Mayor Callahan asked that they be redistributed. Jabbour asked that a list of the disputed Items be submitted for review at the next meeting. 6 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 4, 1993 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned the special Orono City Council meeting at 6:05 p.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallln, City Clerk I TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT; (-P\kon Moorse, City Administrator /y John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Directo January 21, 1993 Orono Baseball Association - Bederwood Park % As everyone may be aware, the Orono Baseball Association (OBA) has been using the Bederwood Park ball diamond for scheduled use. The use of the bal3 diamond by OBA is contingent upon Council approval each year. The process has been that the Park Commission does the review and recommends to Council whether or not to allow the use of the ball diamond by OBA. At the December Park Commission meeting, the Park Commission 3pp]fov0d the use of the ball diamond by the OBA tor the 1993 session with the same criteria as in 1992 with the understanding that 1993 will be the last year. Attached are the December Park Commission Minutes related to the OBA approval Mr. Gary Larson of the OBA will be in attendance to answer any questions. MINUTES OF THE HAPK COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 1992 ATTENDANCE 7:06 P.M. The Park Commission met on the abov? date with the following members present: Acting Chairperson Alex vongries, Susan Wilson, Phi ^Bradley and Robert Howe I Is. Li I i McMiI Ian arrived at 7:28 p.m. Dick Flint arrived at 8:10 p.m. Sherokee Ilse arrived at 8:35 p.m. The following represented the City staff: John Gerhardson, Public Works Director; and Teri Naab, Recorder. (#1) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Vongries suggested changes to Page 3, Paragraph 5, and to Page 5, Paragraph 7. It was moved by WiIson, seconded by Howei!s, to approve the minutes of the November 2, 1992 Park Commission meeting as amended. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#2) ORONO BASEBALL ASSOCIATION Gary Larson, President of oBA, reported OBA has met with the Maple Plain Council on November 25th to present their Idea to use the baseball field adjacent to the "Town Team" field. He noted the presentation was received favorably. The next step will be to present it to the Maple Plain Park Commission. Bradley asked when the field could be expected to be cou.pieted for use. Larson stated, if approved, they would commence constructing the field In the spring and it would be ready for use In the 1994 season. He addea, OBA would like to move from Bederwood to the new site the dugouts, the concession stand, and the fence if it Is deemed cost effective. Wilson asked If Larson felt it feasible to accomplish the goals of the fund raiser and asked how much they needed for the project. Larson felt It was feasible a^'^ noted they would need approximately $20,000, Bradley asked if the one field In Maple Plain would handle the projected population needs. Larson explained one field can handle a 16 team league and currently they have 5 teams. Bradley asked if OBA is no longer pursuing the site across from the Orono High School. i MINUTUn or THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 1992 OBA - CONT. Larson stated that is definitely the preferred long-term site, but financially at this time OBA is in no position to pursue that option on Its own. He noted OBA has helped to Improve the school fields which they currently are using. Vong»*ies recommended OBA continue to think about the site near the school as an option, and asked him to continue to think of the Park Commission as a supporting group for that complex project. Larson stated if the Park Commission wished to help in any way, they might coris i der ass i st i ng in the mov i ng of the buildings to the new site. He added, this would mean that OBA would need to use Bederwood Park for the 1993 season, and noted he felt that was the intent of the City Council’s resolution. Wilson noted the Park Commission Is Interested In OBA making progress toward a future pi a . Vongrles asked if OBA used Bederwood Park to the level it desired during the 1992 season. Larson stated they would have used it much more if permitted. McMillan arrived at this time, 7:20 p.m. It was moved by Bradley, seconded by Howells, to recommend the authorization of OBA to use tne Bederwood Park for the 1993 season, to be considered the final year of use by OBA, conditioned upon the same terms and conditions as approved for the 1992 season. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•3) SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT - CRYSTAL BAY SITE Wilson reported the sub-committee (Wilson and Bradley) met with Gerhardson to discuss some possibilities for the site, which are presented in the memo. She noted the Post Office is to remain and wishes to install a turnaround for better access. There is a possibility that Prospect Avenue could be abandoned, combining Parcels A and B. The sub-committee felt Parcel C (Council chambers site) was not needed for park land. Gerhard'cn said ail buildings but the Council Chambers are scheduled tor removal. Vongrles oted the Council expects money from the Park Dedication Fund for the Crystal Bay site, and money for razing of the buI IdIngs. ((A TO: Mayor and City Council FROM; Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE: January 22, 1993 SUBJECT; DNR Maxwell Bay Access Proposal ht 7i CounciImember Hurr has invited representatives of the DNR to attend the Council meeting sc that the Council can provide conceptual direction to the DNR regarding their Maxwell Bay access proposal. The DNR has requested conceptual approval of an access proposal on Maxwell Bay so that they can proceed with preliminary work regarding the purchase of property on the Bay. I have attached a letter from the Commissioner of the DNR regarding the Maxwell Bay access and set of four proposals prepared by the DNR for an access on Maxwell Bay. Councilmember Hurr will provide a draft letter at the meeting outlining a set of parameters within which the City would accept an access at Maxwell Bay. » > * M STATE OF ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-4037 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER ONR information (61?J 296 6167 January 20, 1993 are The Honorable Edward Celluhan Mayor, City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ma> or Ct ahan: in response to recent developments related to the LMCD’s Lake Access Task Force l thought It would be appropriate to communicate the DNR’s position and our Intend^ j future course of action. While we intend to continue our participation in the Task Force, and wish the City of Oro.no would also, we respect the City’s position and committed to working co-operatively with the City of Orono. First, I am pleased with the relationship we enjoy with the citizens and City of Orono. I believe it is based on mutual respect with open communication of all the Issues and concerns. We Intend to continue this relationship by working with the City In the evaluation of the Maxwell Bay public access proposal. The positive contributions Gabriel Jabbour and JoEilen Hurr in the evaluation and development of the Maxwen Bey proposal cannot be over emphasized, and we thank them. Second, we agree not to pursue additional public access proposals within the City of Oror‘o until the Issue of equitable distribution of public access around Lake Minnetonka has been addressed and a solution Is being implemented. It is our belief that all 14 cities around the Lake have the responsibility to assist in the development of additional public access sites. The means of cooperation of all 14 cit«s will be recommended by the Task Force. We look forward to working with an ^ the communities In the future in dealing with the equhable distribution of public ac»ss to Lake Minnetonka. An access that substantially fulfills the parking goal of 76 additional car/trailer spaces for Zone 1 will preclude the need for further access In Zone 1. AN eOUAU OPFORtUNtTY CMALOYER Mayor Callahan Pago 2I have Instructed my staff to continue to work closely with the City of Orono In the develcyment of the Maxwell Bay proposal. I am confident that ail parties can come to an understanding and agreement that both serves the public end the needs of the Citv of Orono. The City ot Orono and the DNR have defined a cooperative reietionship that Should be an example for future public access siting on Lake Minnetonka and throughout the State of Minnesota. Sinct»rely, iodney Sarido Commissioner Dennis Asmussen Senator Gen Olson Representative Steve Smith David Cochran, Chairman of LMCD Lake Access Task Force Members Gabriel Jabbour JoEllen Hurr te-1 »• IM'STATE OF ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYtTTE ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 65156-4037 OFFICE OF TMC commissioner ONR INFORMATION (612) 296 6167 January 20. 1993 The Honorable Edward Callohen Mayor, City of Orono Box 66 C*yst0l Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Oailahan: In response to recent developments related to the LMCD’s Lake Access Task thought It would be appropriate to communicate the DNR's position and our Intended future course of action. While we intend to continue our participation in the '^ask Force, ar<j wish the City of Orono would also, we respect the City’s pos tior and are committed to working co-operative'y with the City of Orono. First I am pleased with the relationship we enjoy with the citizens and Cit> of Orono. I believe It Is based on mutual respect with open communication of ell the 'ssues and concerns. We Intend to continue this relationship by working wrth the Cry In the evaluat on of the Maxwell Bay public access proposal. The positiv e contributions of Gabriel Jabbour and JoEllen Hurr in the evaluation and development of the Maxwell Bay proposal cannot be over emphasi.-ed, a.nd we thank them.Bay proposal cannot be over emphasi Second, we aoree not to pursue add'tlonal public access proposals wthin the City of tnat a# 14 owes around the Lake have the responsibility to f °* additional public access sites. The means of cooperation of ail rdrerMTifTMinHAri hv the Task Force. We took forward to working with an or the communRIes fn the future m oeeimg with the Lake Minnetonka. An access that substantially fulfills car/lrailer f paces lor Zone 1 wSI predode the need for further ecoasa In Zone 1. • ^ 19 • 1 •rMm.OVER [9}§l9] sir«r«] [•iiir«w.jii«v-T«i •iij« r*iir«iir*i •I9L«r«i9imfr«rf V'.Tf i« ■« #t ’V# I R •T«T^fmiv:rir« •IfM# •If il« • r.T;llfil« Meyor Collahan Pago 2 I have Instructed my staff to continue to work closely with the City of Orono In the development of the Maxwell Bay proposal. I am confident that all parties can come to an understanding and agreement that both serves the public end the needs of the City of Orono. The City of Orono and the DNR have defined a cooperative relationship that should be an example for future public access siting on Lake Minnetonka and througfiout the State of Minnesota. Sincerely, lodney Sando Comrr ‘ oner c.Dennis Asmussen Senator Gen Olson Representative Steve Smith David Cochran, Chairman of LMCD Lake Access Task Force Members Gabriel Jabbour JoFlIen Hurr • • • • «• .. • a •< - DFPARTMENT DATE TO FROM PF.ONE SUBJECT Ik Natural Kesources Region 6 Trails & Waterways November 9f 1992 SF Se STATE OF MINNESOTA Office Memorandum City of Orono Planning Conualssion [?T]CiTYO= I _ OPQNC___I Cordon Regional Trails 4 Waterways Supervisor i 772-7935 '9 ^992 PROPOSED MAXWELL BAY PUBLIC ACCESS CONCEPT PLANS i':tachrtd are 4 concept plans for your review and comment. I lave also aittached «an example of a cooperative agreement that illustrates how the state and the city can cooperatively manage such a facility. I look forward to the November 16 meeting. Attachments cc:Jo Ellen Herr Gene Stromnen. LMGD Ron Morse Stan Linnell S-PPLEHENTAI INFORMATION: PLANTINGS AND DRAINAGE L/iKE MINNETONKA WATER ACCESS - MAXWELL BAY CONCEPTS A - D HENNEPIN COUNTY ~ IN OPONO NOVEMBER 6, 1992 BY: Stun Lin .ell Landscape Architect. Plantings will bo comprised of predominantly native species such as: Green Ash American Linden Sugar Maple Svamo White Oak Red Pine Black Hills Spruce Hed Twig Dogwood American Cranberry Grey Dogwood Sumac During the summer months, plantings will be at least: SOX opaque on the lake side, SOX opacue on any adjoining residential side and no more than 20X opaque on sides adjoining roadways (for security reasons). Final planting areas to be coordinated with city. Tree size: 1” - li" caliper, 8 - 12' height for deciduous trees, 4-6' height for evergreen trees Shrub size: 2-3' height Dra innge; A detailed plan will be provided after properties have been purchased and surveyed. 1 LAK^ niNNEIONKAirWACI^ rlAyW^U. BAY \5 ^?NXh KIO^K - )*HAMPl4AFPeP (iAUeil ^0N4. |VjHPS(’3) P^eKTIOH fWP/TYPl^) rWI^IHA MOOC? toilet 5»HWE)/4^^ plWrnMA E pical -)-woop ToiLsr i?mxi\- LI^HT ^4toPP jiYpe) TY perei^nW S.crr& |^-5nMA KAW^/l^l^ AfYWC. P WmXjCNO^ MWMMtOTA MPIHtWWf 0» WtU«0> M*OU*C« fVn ;i7% em^ep HA/vwe^ 75i'0»= n^Ht fiAvueu- r/Y p| tMlO ib^ ( v«M * ^ )-HWi4AFniP^OR;. WPS (3)pEfeKtip'^pli^NTlKiis woob T^uer ^!i‘tto^-U^Ht fO^OfTFcH<;^f PP■foge ^AYLBilpSfrV^RMA^ON^PPT PLANLAK^ niHNEIOHKA rV^M^U. BAY16 ^ -6TA4e6kioop -id !l£T LIAHT l-\V'.P'fa) ^^V^nf6 (3jPLANTiHA (TYP/4A1-)'loH a)H(7 AyPi 6AJJ roiLg:t 66PLeH u^HTlf 6{/roi¥ Trrg.), 1W -fi? C^)0PS7. HgiAHf!»oii.6 IS II? mmm msmmmf} Seei^ |9i llfeiKwfli liuii >5 50 t ft)luwweu\coHceer plan "dLAKg. niHN^tOHKA WATER A0^5 riA)^UlEU^ &AY65-76 <iM^/TRMLg^ 6PA^e6>15 CAf- 5PA4£5 \%\ 5/re APM’AffP^. 5.05 A^/^6 APfW. 65^ Apff^. 5e'x r^cfwep w^[}cxn >ek ___ AfTfk}/ 3|^ HA^WER. WTIliH 75'OEL^e ’. ^2-) U' WOOP TOILE-T 6>CJ^^ KJ06K PW7ATE \ • PIAWK AAnP^Ei}- uGmianoffTiff')- Avi Max? lOiixT E£Wh ' V.Jvm^xw wKPfrrpj— iO‘% lki KTY^oft — /■ V mWmiSi: TL^>t foAtE* /Kfk>rr‘i l?Jv> I-' •i V I • r 11' I fOA ^wmwT IV ''••III! OH AHP Toies OH •I I I I f N .V .MVI''- \ __rri-^«^-v S3g \iORTH drive : \ ••r--.ii 9." icV 1^ » \ \ ✓'• CI^YSfA •"-NN/ X MiNHttOfA DfPAtliUNf Of NAfUAAl AfiOUACIt — f- iU>fAU Of iNG«MHli»<t. K <« rTOMfCA , jiL I'. lib^-iL.,;!..lArt. u LwiiT\\i/i8Wattat* Ltanlmtra Shea up to 200 walla I5'all”xf' upto400watta IfxZyOT FAX 612 937 0395 CARNES GROUP (2)002/003 V vk % LUMINAIRE OPECtnCATtONO I BAUAST — H.P^. awa and aaO. J HOUSINq — wafcltd caitaPuctfon 20^caM raiadataat. REFLECTOR — uoMzad platan raOaatef ayatam | Nnpad MiditmovaMoMauaitToproyMaatrPR SariacUBoi I EiS. dlaPlbudon* I liatdnalrt Sha; IS” ar 23” LAMPHOLDER — nfp^ porotlain. (T) OASRET-EE.OJN. I LEWS -- claar laimartd ijaaa. j DOOR FRAMC — aaDudad alurnlntarL (J) MOUNTmO BRACKET-aladchannoU” tone (ftitidaiO). uiminalra llamtoar and Spadag: 10.2t. 29.32,3» or 4B Limthiain RMlaclor Optian LatnpWarafB TROL RCCSTTACtE AND SHORTINQ CAR rX CONTROL BT OTHERS. («<Mn apacMad)Lmim Typa: MJIJ or I n M - WarcuryVapar H > Matai Halkla 1^ S - Hlfh Praaaufa Sadlum □ . . „ ___ 120 240 400 Primary VuitapK 200 277 VNO Irnfntm nimwtmrtk jj Poia SaiacSon POLE DATA [ j Sauam OiraigN Sqiiani Taparad Round Suaigtit □ Butt Otmanpon “""j Alianlnuin PdaRnt# [ • iOpdoi NaR Thtetawaa ir- CDoo to□ K: 39 □ AGREEMENT 'V* ■ "S ' .L/ ' Tnla »gre*m*nt. made thli ^ ^ dav of 1988, botwtan tha stats of Hinneaota, acting by and thrBtgh ths Coulaaionar of tha Dapartaant of Natural Rasourcas, haralnaftar rafarrad to aa tha "Stata" and tha City of Craanflald, haralnaftar rafarrad to aa tha "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, tha Coaalaalonar of Natural Raaourcaa has tha authority, duty and raaponalblllty endar Hlnnaaota Statutaa, Sactlon 97A.141. Subdivision 1 to provlda tha public with fraa stata watar accass sltaa on lakao and rlvars whara accaas la Ir.adaquata; and WHEREAS, tha City la authorlzad under Minnesota Statutes 471 to oparata racraatlonal facllltlas: and WHEREAS, additionally tha 1987 laws of Hlnnaaota, Chaptar 400, Sactlon 9, fubdlvlslon 2 (E), approprlatad funds to the Coaalsslonar to acquire land and develop water access sites on lakes and rivers th’‘Oughout the stats: and WHEREAS, tha Stata and City have datarslnad that the present access site to Laks Sarah Is Inadequate and Is of "priority" for Isprovaaant; and whereas, tha City owns property on Laks Sarah legally described as fellows: The east 73.2 feat of the waat 2640 feat of Govarnsant Lot 1, Sactlon 34, Townah^p 119, Range 24, Hannspln County, Minnesota: and the oast 33 fast of the west 2966.8 feet of Oovernaent Lot 1. Sactlon 34. Township Hi. Range 24, Kennapin County. Hlnnssota, as shown on sttachsant A. NOW THEREfORE. In consideration of tha s^'ritai banaflts to be derived by tha public bodlaa hereto and for tha benefit of the general public, the parties agree aa follcws: I. IMPROVEMENT AND COST The Stats and City shall jointly construct s public access to Lake Sarah on the City property as legally described above. The Stats shall: A. Supply the gravel for the parking area, entrance road, and other travel surfaces. B. Supply and deliver the concrete planks, connecting hardware, and ed.dltlonal construction aatarlals (gravel, filter fabric, ae needed for Installation of the reap. C. Supply technical assistance and half the labor necessary In construction of the entrance road, parking area, and rasp. The City shall: A. Supply the equlpnent and half the labor necessary to construct the access. Construction shall Include, but Is not Halted to the entrance road, parking area, and plank ramp Installation. B. Clear the area for the entrance road, parking area, and raap, of brush and trees as flagged by the State. II. ACCESS SITE OPERATION The City agrees to operate the access in the following aanner: A. The City shall eoaply with all local. State and federal laws, regulations, rules, and ordinances which apply for manageaent, operation and aaintenance of a public access, i. The City shall be solely responsible for the aanageaent, operation and aaintenance of the access and keep the saae In good and sanitary order as described herein in coapllanee with the terns of the sgreeMnt. e C. The access shall be free and reaain Cpeh to the public every day cf the year. J4 hours a day. 0. The access shall have no launch restrictions placed upon it. except a£i adopted through surface use sonlng regulations applying to all users, and It Is further understood that the City will not undorteXe any activity which will restrict the DEP4(1Q b MT or MATURfft^ESOURCES /i^S'STA.-.r c':v.':';$iCNER Fn.7 •r*AT!':-:,N ADMINISTRATION Tltlt. Dmtm bKii4cJ AUGl2iy8b By: 0«rald T. Joyc* Approved Aa To Eorm and Execution Hubert K. Humphrey III Attorney Oeneral Special AMlsrai^ AttAttorney General Department ot Natural Rtsourcee Date CITY or GREEMriELD^ By ,^'J Title Date -y / •7- ^ ' f f Title ('(’xL Dmf 7--^--Sg AUG 151988 1 • TO: FROM; DATE: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator 6 Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator January 19, 1993 SUBJECT: LMCD Proposed Ordinance - Foam Flotation Attached is a proposed ordinance from the LMCD for prohibition of molded expandable polystyrene bead material as a flotation device. As noted on Page 2, they are proposing a fall compliance date of April 15, 1995 to give users the balance of the winter to complete the changeover. They have also proposed to make the "no repair/replacement" statement a separate section to assure clarity. Finally, they have included a requirement for discontinuing the use of foam buoys by the end of 1997, requiring that any new buoys or those being repaired or replaced must be of some non-disintegrating material. Consents Requested LMCD has requested any City comments be made prior to their board meeting on January 27th. Please direct staff as to any conanents you wish forwarded to LMCD. tlX' TOj-i 01-11-1593 15:15 612 473 7033 L*1CD en**sl«H*k.. •«Tp-OI ; g1 io r, io. Lf^C b 0tpl V73- c^r/a 1 1 4 Subd . I • 1) I COMMITTEE 1/9/93 RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO ORONO ORDINANCE ^>104: molded expandable polystyrene bead Dock Plotction Prohibition. (D#l«t« undorlino itoiao, odd items in CAPS) Prssmblt. City LMCD hereby determines that: Disintegration of non*-aneaasd stYJofoam MOLDED EXPANDABLE POLYSTYRENE BEAD flo.:aeian blocks used in docks, Bwimming platforms, buoys and other floating structures in City 91 Orono LAKE MINNETONKA has lad to ths disintegrating particles washing lija onto THE LAKH ijiinpp. shoreland jjL Orotto in substantial and unsightly quantities, endaneerine DETRACTING PROM the comfort and enjoyment of the affected property owners. THIS HAS THREATENED THE LAKE ENVIRONMENT and caused nftd causing en.YirQn«Bfntgl dfggg gad gsneral]y unsiahtlY undoairable public conditions* 2) Such disintegration is a ni.mril characteristic of Ih-M. etyrofoam described MOLDED EXPANDABLE POLYSTYRENE BEAD MATERIAL when used for flotation purposes, ia JJu. SiiXX. llfllitA-*. . 3) Such dlsintegrstion it aceelarstad by the *'**^^®"* aquatic eniwala and waterfowl gPd« AH tUriL*. Nnl MAY constitute a hatard to their wall*baing. 4) Additional health and aafaty concarna can occur if such material ia aubjact to EXTREME heat OR PLaMB, gaaolina or other petroleum products, end 3) The use of non-ancaeed BtTrfltfliB MOLDED EXPANDABLE POLYSTYRENE BEAD MATERIAL for the purpose mentioned above is PROHIBITED. A. BVlDilC. within ji^he meani na ftl OrflPQ lli-tK. Codt *, ChlBt-tX *-»- jLllbAkSHlfllL li 21* Subd. 2. Definition. IaT IAJ BUrgRlH fli. SACseed srwrafosm MOLDID EXPANDABLE POLYilYRlNE BEAD MATERIAL ms.ns sny brand of eapandsd polyatyrene beadi * block, shset. billet or other shape which is not eoepleteiy encased in a permanent FULLY tlALlD f!„, container THE LIFE OP WHICH WILL AT WATER STRUCTURE IS INTENDED FOR USE IN LAKE MINNETONKA. lUCB CASING. COATING OR CONTAINER MUST BE capable of withstanding sction by ice or other alesients. enimala ® ^ ‘ ‘ ^ bv users so Ihet d1aintegratiee of the molded ahapee mto emaller thunks or individual beads is prevoated. Sobd. 3. Uee of Mon-enoasad It TSafSifl MOLDED IXPANOAILE POLVITYRINt BEAD MATERIAL Prohibited. a. It ia a miadameanor (or appropriate f*®* fs.i.n-. person te use non-an«sssd MOtOID IXPANOAlLI ** ’ ^ i. This ordinsnee shall apply ta eueh uatf •*^**'^*”* ^ POLYiTYHENi BEAD MATIIIAL whs ere presently uiing tilt* IHA fiHLX. 01-11-1993 l*^!lb 61? 473 7033 LMCD p.e? !*• •‘4 LMCD WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE 1/9/52 RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO ORONO ORDINANCE fM04, Pa|« 2 LAKE MINNETONKA for purpoaor forbidden PROHIBITED by thi* ordinanc# FOR DOCKS AND FLOATING PLATFORMS may oontinua to uai thtro for auch purpoaaa in axiating atrueturaa ourrantly containing tham until Df^embar 13._APRIL 15, 199S . Thi ■ axeaption doax julL inclUdg JUB.Aix AX. raolacamant Q_t axia tina a t yrof oam. C. MOLDED EXPANDABLE POLYSTYRENE BEAD MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED FOR REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT IN FLOATING STRUCTURES AFTER THE ADOPTION OP THIS ORDINANCE. D. BUOYS MADE OF MOLDED EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BEAD MATERIAL MAY CONTINUE IN USE FOR SUCH PURPOSES UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 1997. IP A NEW BUOY IS INSTALLED IN LAKE MINNETONKA IT MUST COMPLY WITH THIS ORDINANCE IMMEDIATELY. A BUOY WHICH REQUIRES ANY REPAIR MUST BE REPLACED WITH ENCASED PROTICTION DESCRIBED IN SUED. 2 OR WITH EXTRUDED CLOSED CELL FOAM OR OTHER NON-DISINTlCRATINa MATERIAL. LMCD STAFF MEMO TO ORONO STAFF: Orono ordinanoa #104 haa conatruetivaly aarvad to guida LMCD in arriving at an ordinanca whioh tha LMCD baliavti complinanta tha Orono ragulation concarning: tha u§a *>,. mo a •xpandibl# pol/*cyr«n« dock flotation notorial* .Many LMCD changaa have to do with iinguago to adapt it for ^ LMCD purpoaaa. Two diatinct ohangaa havt batn mada, namal/. Subd. 3.B. ohanging tha data for full coopHanca to April 15, 1995. This extension from 12/31/94 allowa multiple dock ownar. to utilita tha balanca of th. wintar •••■•* ‘®***;; tha ehangas naadad prior to th# next year a boating aaaaon. gubd. 3.C, new faction, aaauraa clarif ioation that '^**^**^* **^ raplaeaniant prohibit laoldad axpandablo bead polyatyrtna uaa. Subd. 3.0. Buoy rogtilatioa mada a ••yarata aub-aactieo for clarity and amphaaia within tha ordinance. Thraa conalttaa raoomm.nu.tIona will ba #^V*"**J at LKC.’> Board 1 /27/93. Any city eoflunant la walcoma before or thia maatinf ;7?a« Ti .^tromiianEugene Exacurive DlrauCor January I’ . 1993 ( u L ' ORDINANCE # 110 , 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 9.58, PROHIBITING THE USE OP NON-ENCASRD MOLDED POLYSTYRENE EXPANDED-BEAD FOAM AS A DOCK FLOTATION DEVICE The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: Section 1. The City of Oronc Municipal Code, Chapter 9, is hereby amended by adding Section 9.58 to read as follows: Section 9.58 Molded Polystyrene Bxpanded-Bead Foam Dock Flotation Prohibition. Subd. 1. Preamble. The City hereby determines 1) that disintegration of non-encased uicJded polystyrene expandec^bead foam flotation blocks used in docks, :iwimming platforms, buoys, and other floating structures in the City of Orono has^ led to the disintegrating particles washing up onto shoreland in Orono in substantial and unsightly quantities endangering the comfort ana enjoyment of the affected property owners and causing environmental and aesthetic damage, and generally unsightly and undesirable public conditions; 2) that such disintegration is a natural characteristic of the molded polystyrene e^anded-bead foam described when used for flotation purposes in the City limits; 3) that such disintegration is accelerated by the actions of aquatic animals and waterfowl and, in turn, constitutes a hazard to their well-being; 4) that additional health and safety concerns can occur if such material is subject to heat, gasoline or other petroleum products; and 5) the use of non-encased molded polystyrene expanded-bead foam for the purpose mentioned above is a public nuisance within the meaning of Orono City Code, Chapter 9, Subsection 9.31. Subd. 2. Definition. For the purpose of this section, non- encased molded polystyrene expanded-bead foam means any brand of expanded polystyrene beads molded into a block, sheet, billet, or other shape which is not completely encased in a permanent casing, coating, or container capable of withstanding action by Ice or other elements, animals, and normal activity by so that disintegration of tne molded shapes into smaller chunks or individual beads is prevented. Subd. 3. Use of Non-encased Molded Polystyrene Expanded- Bead Foam Prohibited. A. It is a misdemeanor for any person to use “O"*;*"®***^ molded polystyrene expanded-bead fo^ blocks, s^eeta, billets or other s^hapes for dock construction or flotation, swiping Platforms, buoys or other floating or similar structures in lakes or streams in the City, whether such uses are permanent or seasonal in nature. • • c B. This ordinance shall apply to such uses after the date of the adoption of this ordinance except when ovrners of such non- encased molded polystyrene expandod-bead foam materials who are presently using them in the City for purposes forbidden by this ordinance may continue to use them for such purposes in existing structures currently containing them until December 31, 1934. This exception* ddes not include repair or replacement of existing molded polystyrene expanded-bead foa.n. Section 2. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect and shall be enforced from and after the date of its adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this 9th day of November , 1992, by a vote of ayes, _0_ nays. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Att' iStt allin. City Clerk U TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT J Mayor Callahan and Orcno CounciImembers Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning Sc Zoning Administrator January 20, 1S93 ♦♦1778/1779 Andrew Goetten, 1385 Fox Street - Variance/ Subdivision - Resolutions/Special Lot Combination Attached are redrafts of the variance and prelimirary plat approval resolutions for the Goetten subdivision. Also attached is a special lot combination agreement. The. special let combination is boilerplate except for the conditions A, B and C of item 4 on page 2 . Please review these documents and advise staff of any revisions you feel are necessary. jjq further vote is needed on the two .resoluticns. However, staff would request Council approval of the special Lot Combination Agreement. Moved by seconded by approve the wording and conditions o£ the Special Lot Coi^bination j^0]^eeiiient betweei’ Andrew Goetten and the City of Orono. Vote:ayes nays CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 473-7357 55323 APPLICATION NO. 1770/177& NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice; 1/13/93 TO; Andrew Goetten 1385 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES;Paul Anderson Messerli & Kramer 1800 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-4218 TYPE OP APPLICATION; Variance Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: January 11, 1993 VOTE:2 FOR 1 AGAINST 1 ABSTENTION COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: To approve the request for lot line revision, credit of Outlet A toward area of Lot 1, and approval of resolutions with a number of amendments. (Copies of revised resolution drafts are attached- these will be finalized upon approval by the Mayor and receipt of a revised plat drawing from you.) A proposed Special Lot Combination Agreement has been enclosed, subject to Council approval. Preliminary Subdivision Plat Approval - Applicant must provide to the City all information and/or improvements required for final plat approval as noted in the preliminary plat approval resolution. Preliminary plat approval expires 1 year after the date of the resolution. Note that prior to filing cf the final plat after final subdivision approval, all taxes for the current year must be paid. If you desire certified copies of thr official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. ;3PECI;Tj lot combination AGREEMENT This indenture is made and entered into this by and between day of corpo^Itior! under the laws of ^he State of Minnesota its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as Grantee ) . WITNESSETH. WHEREAS, Grantor(s) are the owner(s) of real property in G'-v -f Orono, County of Hennepin,. State of Minnesota, legally deLrlbld as follows (and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "properties"*: Lot 1, Block 1, (hereinafter described as "Parcel A"); and Outlet A, (hereinafter described as "Parcel B"); and WHEREAS. Parcel A and Parcel B are physically separated from each Other which prevents their being combined into one egally described lot o? parcel, and/or for »ame or other rHeon the Hennepin County Assessor cannot co,tbine Parcel A and Parcel B into one parcel for tax purposes, ana WHEREAS, notwithstanding the above it is the b^c =ntr:d Sirro persons, and further that Parcel A ®®hey ^ inused and/or developed in common by Grantor(a) as if tn y fact one parcel instead of two. MOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the ..on.,... "S, •■‘“o-f.*,-.s;:;." :«• "S?covenant, ^rant gift, ^xt cl . ^ restrict, limit and to restrict, and Grantor(s) ^ ^ development of Parcel rrnd“p:r«t nicordfrig to'and'^undar'ths condition, .nd covenant, herein contained, as follow: 1. Grantor(s. agr.. that ^ toti*orp.‘rc.™nd“”a*t P.rc.1 A and P.rc.l B -ill not be u.ed. conveyed, sold, leased or otherwise encumbered except together as if they were a single parcel. 2 Grantor(s) and Grantee agree that Parcel A shall be considered the primary parcel which may be used or developed for any principal use as may be permitted in the zoning district, subject to all performance standards and approvals required therefore. 3 Grantor (s) and Grantee agree that Parcel B shall be considered accessory to Parcel A, and "hat Parcel B may be used or developed for accessory uses as may be permitted in the zoning district, but only at such time that a principal use is established on Parcel A, and subject to all performance standards and approvals required therefore. 4. Grantor(s) agree to restrict and limit the use and/or improvement of Parcel B as follows: a. No structures may be constructed or located on Parcel B except the following: t 1) One seasonal dock; location and number of slips allowed shall be per the regulations or the LMCD. 2) One lock box no greater than 20 square feet in area and no greater than 48 inches in height. 3) Lakeshore access stairway/lift/].anding subject to requirements of Municipal Cede Section 10.56 "Shoreland Management^. b. Parcel B shall not serve as an accesjjory parking area. c. Parcel B is created for the exclusive us*^, of the owners of Parcel A. 5. Grantee shall not issue any building permit, " conditional use permit for any structure or use on the properties inconsistent with the covenants contaj.ned herein. 6. Grantor (s) hereby grant to Grantee the right above described properties for tne purposes enforcement of the covenants ccntaineG lawfully removed from these properties without any structures, uses, substances and natural or unnatural materials inconsistent with the covenants contained herein. and restrictions contained herein may be enforced ^ ^ Grantor (s) who are in possession incurred byGrantee all costa and expenses including attorneys fees incurred oy Grantee in enforcing the terms of this indenture. • . Th« tarm. and condition, of thi. 3*L^,l"^ily*b4•manded or axtingul.hed and thereafter Parcel A and Parcel B may oe subdivided, sold separately or reduced in part only upon application by Grantor(s) to Grantee for approval of a ’’Subdivision” in accordance with the platting code Oi. the City in effect, at the time of such application. 9 Grantor(s) agree that recording of this indenture shall not vest any property rights in the properties and that any zoning or development authorities granted herein or hereinafter b-cause cf this indenture shall remain subject to future regulation, moaification and/or limitation by Grantee or other regu.atory bodies in accordance with legally applicable and enforceable zoning or ocher ordinances of Grantee. 10. Grantor(s) do not intend that the public should have any interest in the above properties by virtue of this indenture or other’.'ise, except as hereinabove set forth. All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. CITY OF ORONO GRAIJTOR (S) Mayor And City Clerk (City Acknowledgment)STATE OF MINI^ESOTA ) } 88 . COUNTY OF HENTJEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of- - - - - - -» ^flikyor^and City Clerk, respectively,^ of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COIWISSICN EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this Public day of (Individual Acknowledgment) 19_, before me, a Notary within and* for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the persons(sj described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (theii) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES This document is being recorded for the benefit of the City of Orono per Minnesota Statutes 386.77. State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt This instrument was drafted by: City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) AND i ',03, SUBDIVISION 6 (B), AND TO MUNICIPAL SUED VISION CODE SECTIONS 11.10, SUBDIVISION 14 AND 11.03.24 FILE #1770 WHEREAS, Andrew J. Goetten (hereinafter "the applicant ) is owner of the property located at 1385 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.2S , ^ Ie1tions^'ll^.'fo'^'*‘''s®^^^^^^ iT^^ard ”ll !‘o3^24. ^ to permit the purpos6 and the intent thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File il778. Th« property 1. locaced in the RR-IB Rural Reeidentl^ Zoning Di.triot, requiring 2 ecree of ^9u°u. ^ buildabie land in each building lot per Municipal Code Section 10.28. Subdivision 5 (B). 3 .The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this on November 16. 1992 and on a vote cf « ® against, recommended that the property, v,:s.s'K;ir. 'jr::";.;!""'.‘S.v s Page 1 of 5 necessary. 4. The City Council rc'-iewed this application on DeceT±)er 14, 1992 and considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, verbal and -,^ricten comments by the applicant and his attorney, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. On December 14, 1992, the Qlty Council voted 3 favor, 1 against, wi«_h * abstention, to grant approval of the variance as requested by the applicant and direct staff to draft a resolution for approval. 5. On January 11, 1993 the applicant: revised his request by requestinq that the initially proposed lot line be moved westward,'leaving 1.23 acres in Lot 2 and leaving Lot 1 with 1.78 acres plus 0.23 acres credit from Outlot A for a total of 2.01 acres. The Council finds that granting a variance to allow such credit is in keeping with the unique circumstances cf Resolution #1x78. 6. The Council hereby determines that Resolution 1*1178 establishes a unique contract between the City and the applicant and the Council further finds that, whether or not said contract is legally enforceable^, the unique circumstances surrounding Resolution #1178 the subsequent placement of the MUSA boundary establish the clear intent of a past City Counc.il which the current City Council intends to upheld. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grant variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections ' Subdivision 5 (B) and 10.03, Subdivision 6 to Subdivision Code Sections 11.10, Subdivision 14 and 11^03.24 to permit the subdivision of the applicant's property to * Jore lot with the existing residence and a 2. acre new building site in the RR-IB Zoning District using non-contiguous •creage where each lot would normally be required to contain at lease t acres of contiguous area, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 1. 2 . 3 . January, Authorities granted by this variance run with the Property not 2ith the applicant, but are permissive only ^ Vao favf»rrised bv application for a subdivision w^thr^one year of the date'^o^f Council approval, or this varia^rwill expire on that date (January 11, 1994) . Violation of or non-compliance with any of the cerms and )^inditions of the variance shall constitute a violation ? hht 7onina code shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. “nonrle^^s orthis^Verol^tTon his heirs successors and assigns, hereby agrees ^^the reco?dfng of ?his resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day of 199J . . j ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of ^ S?nnesota municipal corporation and aard instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Pub3J.c My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 L STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEP'N ) 1 99 befo«-''m^NHE^.y'P^Eirc ^Hd-ToTTTT7<"oanty. 'personally appeared ----------------—=—= *-^0appeared-------------------------rrr^T-iTrrTT^ricribed in and who executed the fS?:going"rnstrJ;ej?!^^^ NOTARY PUBL.IC STAiTE OF MINNESOTA ) ) da. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) be£ore°mrT-i?.Ta-57‘Kbrrc t?thin and tor said county, personally appeared 199 appeared ----—r ,-ho pereoTiTaT'dii'^'eribed in a~n~d who executed the NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 3 aforesaid and running th*. *!ce East 720 feet to the Northerly line on side of right of way of the Minnetonka Branch of the Great Northern Railway; thence Southwesterly along the Northerly line on side of said right cf way 827.05 feet to the West line of Lot 3 aforesaid; thence North 423.1 feet to place of beginning, t.he boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by three judicial landmarks placed at the most Easterly corner of said tract of land a: a point in the Southwesterly line and at a point in the North line where said lines "are intersected respectively by a line parall'2l to and 33 feet east of the West line of said lot. Also that part of the West 33 feet of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying Southerly of County Road No. 7, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by judicial landmarks placed at the Northwest corner and the Northeast corner, respectively, of said tract of land, and at a point in the Westerly line thereof 298.3 feet South along said line from said Northwesterly comer, and in the East line thereof at a point 275.4 feet South cf the Northeast comer thereof. •1% WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.38 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Crono ^.Manning Commission held a public hearing on November 16, 1992, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to specik thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on December 14, 1992, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Andrew J. Goetten, noting the following findings of fact: 1 The portion of the property proposed for subdivision is located within tte RR-IB Single Fa.mily Rural Residential Zoning District re;quiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately acres, of which 3.01 acres is contiguous dry buildable lana exclusive of 33 feet of right-of-way for Orono Orchard Road, wetlands, and the nor-contiguous portions south of County Road 15. 3. The proposed plat contains two lots. Lot 1 consisting of 1.78 dry contiguous acres plus 0.23 .acres located south of County Road 15 for a total of 2.01 acre.a and Lot 2 consisting of 1.23 dry contiguous acres. Lot 1 requires a variance to allow credit for non-contiguous area. Lot 2 requires a lot area variance. These variances have been granted per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 3223 of the City Council. 4 Each of Lots 1 and 2 abuts a public roadway open to traffic, and each lot contains the required 200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear of the 50' front yard. 5 Lot 2, containing an existing residence, is within the Metropolitan Jrban Service Area ‘^USA) and is provided with municipal sewer as part of the 1980-1 ®J^*5ffd^2ithProiect. Lot 1, currently vacant, will not be served with m^icioai sewer, is outside the MUSA, and has been confirmed as Viaving acceptable primary and alternate drainfield sites. Page 2 of 6 c A citv dGSiQncitsd vs^etland occurs within thG prc^^crty 3 wetlands. 1 33' of right-of-way for Orono Orchard aiai«t=a ,ithia t». pl.t. « o“,; u... sfSri pVitvssw- s.%.r--.pSi's retired as part of this subdivision. 9. Lot 2 shall continue to gf FoTs«ee\“of Or^o Jrta^^d\o^^d t^rfot^-orbo^h^^la^^^^^^^ ^“location to be approved by the Public Works Department. 10. The portion foSuotl.^°and"''sh\°U be and Orono Lane shal with Lot 1 as residential lake maintained i" ^e sublet to a Sepcial Lot ?S^?Lt °on to be'filed on the Chain of Title of Lot 1 ana Outlet A. 11. Lot 1 has been t^o° serve^ a ^propoi'ed ^single _ pt f Orono hereby approves th«_ P dated" 10-29-92, revised 11-5-92, by bhe following conditions: 1. variance, will be granted ^or lot area tor LotJ. and non- condS: oVresoU^lon No. 3223 of tne City Council. Page 3 of 6 2. Lot 1 shall be granted access on either Fox Street or Orono Orchard Road (but not on both roads) at a location to be approved by the Public Works Department. 3. A dedication of 33' right-of-way for Orono Orchard Road shall be indicated on the plat drawings. 4. A triangular portion of Orono Lane shall be dedicated for Orono Lane right-of-way on the plat drawings. 5. Applicant shall execute a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetlands located in Lots 1 and 2, and such easement shall be shown on the plat drawings as "drainage easements". 6. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be granted along interior and perimete.' lot lines. 7. The subdivision shall be subject to the standard park fee. a The lake access parcel located south of County Road 15 and Orono Lane shall be platted as Outiot A. and shall be maintained in common with Lot 1 as residential lake access for Lot 1, subject to a Special Lot Combination resolution to be filed in the Chain of Title of both Lot 1 and Cutlot A. 9. The city shall have the judicial landmark at the east end of the property replaced to its correct location. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheauled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" ■ 200'. Drawing to include: A Lot lines platted per pre.liminary survey by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated 10-29-92, revised 11-5-92. B Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. Page 4 of 6 c Designation o£ Che wetlands i" ^ots 1 and 2 as a drainage easenent on the plat diawing . Legal docutnents required: A. Title opinion addressed^ to^ the „,^^\°“rresi mortgage holders sian the plat and all otherindicated therein ®hall sign the pi documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant P^°;;^^®f^^^in“the''p?oper?y^recorded easements currently citecciny c. Signed and "r?ng des«tptIor:iy Easement document; blanK are be filled out as follows: .over the drainage easements as shown on the plat of ‘ plat nam^—) " • D special Lot Combination rsolution for Lot 1 and Outlot A City to draft). 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: A. Legal review and filing fees - $200.00 B. 'Parlt Commission “fggP'aB^^t^co^determine the !ar.ds. The City '‘--f "w"fair market value of t^e undevei^p^^^^^^ r:"vs. »« Page 5 of ^ TO;FROM;DATE;SUBJECT;Mayor Callahan and Orono Council members ^Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^*Ot^ %Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning AdWT^JJJ^a'tor January 19, 1993Shoreland Flexibility Request - City of VictoriaAttached is Victoria's formal request for flexibility from the DNR's Shoreland Management Standards. Flexibility is requested the following areas: 1. Lot width/area for duplex lots not or Lake Minnetonka or Bavaria Lake. 2. Building height. 3. Residential density (not Lake Minnetonka). 4. Impervious surface (but noc Lake Minnetonka). 5. Setback from top of bluff. 6. Deck encroachment into lakeshore setback. Attached find copy of the letters sent to the standard s' signature. Shoreland Ordinance Status Update The DNR has teceived^^nexibiUty Minneton a ci however, is just nearing completion of y*«ib H^'Sceived"' °As'h th?.^“):Ui”nr""hav: betn"TdvY3ed'% Ceil adopted the ordinance for review of advised that while they had specific time review andflexibility, no .uch timeframe was required for their review ana ultimate approval of our ordinance. I will keep the Council advised as further Information is received. ch PHONc NO M STATE OF ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATERS, 1200 WARNER ROAD. ST. PAUL, (612) 772-7916 MN bSlO December 28, 1992 ISO': The Honorable Barbara Peterson Mayor, City of Orono P.O. Box 164 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Peterson: DEC 2 9 :992 REVIEW AND COMMENT ON CITY OF VICTORIA'S REQUEST FOR FLEXIBILITY FROM STATE OF MINNESOTA'S SHORELAITD MANAGEMENT STANDARDS As required by the statewide shoreland management standards, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR; and the City of Victoria are hereby notifying your city of Victoria's request for flexibility from the statewide standards as outlined below, and in the enclosure prepared by the city's consultant. In accordance with the rules, the Comaissioner and the city must solicit the input and approval of other governmental bodies that could be affected or impacted by the alternate controls. The city and the DNR are asking that your city provide its review and comments, if any, to either DNR or the city within 45 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received prior to then, we will assume that your cit^ has no concerns with the neighboring city's proposal. The City of Victoria is requesting flexibility from the following statewide standards: 1. Lot width, 2. Lot area, 3. Building height, 4. Residential density, 5. Impervious surface, 6. Top of the bluff, and 7. Decks - additions/expansions to nonconforming structures. Please note that only items 3, 6, and 7 apply to Lake Minnetonka shorela.nd areas while the others apply to the other 15 lake and river shorelands within tho city's corporate limits. Since the city's request is complex, a thorough discussion of this request is attached for you and/or your staff to review. Victoria's consultant has presented the above requests for review and discussion by DNR ard representatives of 11 Lake Minnetonka cities who are working toiother as a Technical Review Conoittee for the purpose of revie'-ir | and discussing individual city's flexibility requests affscting Lake Minnetonka. No problems with the city's request have t*;en noted at any of those meetings. AH eOwAt OPPORTUNITY EMPtOYfH City of Victoria Flexibility Request December 28, 1992 Page (2) As stated earlier, please have appropriate staff review the proposed flexibility request and, if necessary, provide your comments to me at the address listed above within 45 days. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact either Bill Thibault, Victoria's planning consultant at 443-2363 or 546-8100, Ceil Strauss of this office at 772-7910, or me at 772-7916. Sincerely, Edward L. Pick Shoreland Hydrologist Enclosure cc:John Line Stine, Regional Hydrologist Ogbazghi Sium, Supervisor, Land Use Management Unit City Administrator/clerk December 2C, 1992 SHORELAaND ZONING FLEXIBILITY REQUEST INTRODUCTION State regulations governing shoreland apply statewide. Although several classes of lakes are recognized such as natural environment lakes, recreational development lakes, general development lakes, the geological setting of these lakes thri ughout the State varies considerably as well as the urban and lural environments in which they are located. B^ause of this, the State allows flexibility with respect to certain features in the ordinance provided the intent of the ordinance is met. Some key factors affecting Victoria’s shoreland flexibility request include; 1. Numerous areas abutting the classified lakes are already subdivided, however, some of these have been subdivided under the existing shoreland regulations which have some provisions that are stricter than the current standards in the State guide. In other areas, the subdivision occurred prior to the City ’s tirst shoreland ordinance. 2. The Lake Minnetonka area is substantially developed and has wooded, steep slopes throughout most of its area. 3. Portions of Victoria’s ordinance exceed the State standard, e.g. lot width and lot area for most of the single family developments (see pages 2 and 3). All land in Victoria abutting Lake Minnetonka is zoned Lake Minnetonka Residential District - no commercial or industrial uses are allowed. Park and open space exist or is proposed for most of the shoreline on all the other lakes. 4. 5.Viitually :ill of downtown Victoria falls within 1,(KX) feet of Stieger Lake. Portions or downtown have nearly 90% impervious surfacing and much of the area was developed and platted 100 years ago. If Statewide standards arc rigorously applied and adopted as provided for in the State’s model ordinance, too miany legally existing uses and lots would become nonconforming creating unnecessary complications. Further development and redevelopment of downtown could become impossible. The flexibility request allows for adjustments based or: these factors and conditions while meeting the State’s general requirements and the land use policies and objectives of the City as expressed in the City ’s comprehensive plan and other documents. tXE X IB IL rr Y »_I3 LMS mEyriHEJB. Based on a review of conditions in Victoria, the comprehensive plan and the Statewide standards, flexibility from the shoreland stand.irds is requested in the following areas: I Lot widtn - but not on Lake Minnetonka Lor area • but not on Lake Mumetonka Building height December 20, 1992 4. 5. 6. 7. Residential density - but not on Lake Minnetonka Impervious surface - but not on Lake Minnetonka Top of the Bluff Decks - additions/expansion to nonconforming structures 1. LOT WIDTH No flexibility is sought for property on Lake Minnetonka or General Development pikes. A 10 foot reduction in lot width for duplex dwellings is requested to allow 125 feet of lot width instead of 135 feet. No construction of duplexes is anticipated. Allowing duplexes to have a width of 125 feet on Natural Environment Lakes is also requested, however, duplex development is not anticipated. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKE Cart Krty Lake Lake St. Jot Scoot Lakt SaBoy Lak e Lake Tamarak RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LAKE Lake Aoburn Chorcli Lake Kclatr’s Pood Lake Minomraslita Seboix l^e Lake Scicfer Lake Virpaia Ziifflbra Lake GENERAL DEVELOPME.NT LAKE Bavar'a Laka Laic, Miniwtoaka DNR STANDARD Ripirim 125 ’ . f.. 225 ’ dup., 325 ’ tri., 425* quad. 75 ’ ..f.. 135 ’ dup.. 195’ iri.. 255 ’ quad. 75 ’ ..f.. 135 ’dup.. 195’tri., 255 ’ quad. Nofuipanan 125* iT., 220* dup., 315* in., 410* quad. 75 ’i.f., 135 dup.. 190 in., 245' qu«d. 75 ’*.f.. 135 ’dup., 190’tri., 245 ’ quad. VICTORIA EXISTING*125 ’125*U0’/100’«» VICTORIA PROPOSAL Ripinan 125 ’».f. 125 ’dup.123’125 ’ dup.no* a.r. N/Adop. NonriparUn 125 ’ «.f.. 125* dup.125 ’ i.f.. 125 dup.110’ t.f; .S/A dup. •Vktorii OnJin.nc. .How. . two UtnUy dwdlin* (Hupl.*) in (he R.wtaniUI D.Mnct (• »n(i« f.mily wd two Cimily zom) 06 • nHaiimim lot >U« of oi».-h.lf «ct« in ih« dtottUnd btrt no tnere... in lot wtdth i. retjoired. ••Section 405.02 provide, for 110 feet *nd refer, to Section 415.06.2 which '.How.- the mimmum lot width to be lOO f.et. RATIONAL AND lUSTOTCATlON Essentially: historical reasons, sound suburban planning/design, reasons associated with urban improxements (streets, utilities) and cost efficiency in subdividing property to meet market needs. Requiring wider lots for riparian lou has value in that it is likely to improve or allow retenuon of the scenic quality of the lakes and results in less hard surface run off near the shoreland. Requiring nonnparian tots to be wider than normal may not improve the aesthetics or water quality since the structures are removed from the shore by a greater distance and the extra lot width adds to the length of street p>cr lot, thus increasing the public hard surface area and run otf. December 20. 1991 2.LOT AREA No flexibility is sought for property on Lake Minnetonka v^r General Development Lakes. The. City substantially exceeds the requirement for these lakes. Some decrease in lot area is sought for duplex and multi family units on Recreational Development Lakes and Natural Environment Lakes in certain categories. NATURAL E.W1RONMENT LAKE RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LAKE CE.NERAL DEVELOPMENT LAKE DNR STANDARD Ripiriin 40,000 ’ t.f., 70.000' dup., lOO.'JOO ’tri.. 130,000-quad. 20.000 ’ i.f.. 35,000 ’dup. 50,000 ’ in.. 65.000 ’ quad. 15.00:’ I.f.. 26,000* dup., 35,000 ’ Iri., 49.000 ’ quad. Nonripariin 20,000 ’ f.r. 35.000 ’ dup.. 52.000 ’ ui.. 65.000' quad. 15.000 ’ I.f. 26,000 ’ dup.. 38,000 ’ Iri., 49.<XX»’ quad. lu.OOO’ a.f.. 17.500' dup., 25.000 ’ Iri.. 32.500 ’ quad. VICTORIA EXISTING Ripanin Noftripahao 43.560 sq. ft. 20.000 s. ft. 43.560 sq. ft. 15.000 sq. ft. 40,000 sq. ft. 40,000 sq. ft. (gross density) 21,7S0 sq. ft. (net densjty)^ VICTORIA PROPOSAL RipifUn a 43,560* s f.. 43.560’ dup.. N/A in., N/A quad, (aubject to reduclion for park dedication) 43.560* t.f., 43,560’ dup., N/A tri., N/A quad, (subject to reduction for park dedication) 40,000* i.f., N/A dup., N/A tri., N/A quad, (subject to reduction for park dedication) 20,000* f.f., 20,000 ’ dup., 3.600/d.u. tri. and qued. 15.000 ’ , f.. 15,000' dup., 3,000/d.u. tri.and quad. 40.000- a.f.. N/A dup., 3,000/d.u. Iri. and quad. •Nfl 4*a.ntv it deCncd in zoninf oidintoet tt *Th* dtotiiy in toy of th* ftiUicatkl dldncU. e»Jfti!ifed by taking th* lotai land area coraainad n tt.e njbdivmon. minui the loul land area aUoeaud to pubife open ipaei required by ihit Chapter, e.id dividing the rctuli by the numbtr of firmly dwtilinfs lociud or U> b« lociUd id ihll Hibdiviiiore.* RATIONAL. AND JUSTIFICATION Essentially: historical reasons, sound suburban planning/design, reasons associated with urban improvements (streets, utilities) and cost efficiency in subdividing property to meet market needs. Reductions in the lot area arc proposed if property is dedicated consistent with the comprehensive plan. For example, establishment of the Lakes and Greenways Circles including the trail system. December 20, 1992 3. RUll.DING_Il£igIiI Flexibility is st^ught to allow a building height of 35 feet <as allowed in current City ordinance) instead of 25 feet as contained n the model code. natlhal EW ’IROSMENT lake RECREATIONAL nrvFmPMKNT LAKE CENERxVL DEVELOPMENT LAKE VICTORIA PROPOSAL AND justification building height and existing conditions. 4.pf’STDFNTlAL DENSITY FlexibUity is requested in the multiple family categories, but not on lake Minnetonka. D.T*frsiuxi Avn iliqTlFICATION Lake Minnetonka is not affected by this since all^and ^dt?e^.be^2l ■s^?n.^S^nnetonka Residenbal Dismct and the^aty;s_propo^ calculated on a net basis PHD ) AllowinE RTcater density at other locations is justified b©PUD.) Allowing gr ^ nonnp^^ lots). 2) 20.000 calculated on a nci ordinance requires lots to be 40,000 sq. i . ( hw-ause onlv four areas arer,,rr> k Aii«,ae,n« ri^-nsitv at other locauons is jusufied because oniy lou«=s,, - - 4 srr.s 4 December 20, 19925. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE(Imperv’ious surface coverage of lots expressed as a percentage of the lot area)The City ordinance has a higher standard on Lake Minnetonka - 10% compared to 25% in the model ordinance. Flexibility is only requested to allow up to 20% in other zones, except downtown, where commercial zoning and industrial zoning exists. In these two areas 40% is requested in the Industrial zone and 80% in the Commercial zone. Park and open space area exists between downtown and Stieger Lake, and a preliminary drainage plan has been approved by the Watershed District and Hennepin Parks. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT LAKE RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LAKE GENERAL DEVELOPME.n f LAKE TRIBUTARY DNR STANDARD 25%25%25%25% VICTORU EXISTING 30%30%30%30% VICTORIA PROPOSAL (BY ZONING DISTRICTS) Agriculuini District Agriculturtl Prtserviiion District Lake Minoelooki Rtsidential District to 10 10 10 I sadential District Multiple Residence District Office end Limited Commercial District Geoertl Commcrctal District Light Induitriil District 30 30 30 30 General Industrial Diitrici 40 40 40 « - Central Buatnets District N/A SO N/A so 1 RATIONAL AND .FUSTIFICATION Essentially: historical reasons and the variation in need for impervious surfaces based on the way property is used ranging from agriculture and low density residential to intense use such as the Centr^ Business District and the need to redevelop downtown as an urban intensity. 6. IQP.Qf:.PLliIE Model Ordinance - The model ordinance specifies that an additional structure and building setback from the top of bluff be 30 feet. Proposed Ordinance - It is proposed that the additional setback be 20 feet from the top of bluff. R.\TIONAL AND JUSTIFICATION This allows for addiUons, including decks, in situations where the 30 foot requirements is not possible. Having an additional setback of 20 feet IS sufficient to protect the trecline and to accommodate buildings on lots where the depth d(?es not allow the additional 30 foot setback from the top of the bluff. December 20, 1052 7.DFCKS - APENSION TO NONCQNFQRMTNG STRLXTURES 30 feet, whichever is more restrictive. Proposed Ordinance - The proposed ordinance would allow the encroachment to not exce^ 20% of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not encroach closer than 30 feet, whichever is more restricuve. to detach the deck which can be allowed. _J WMMWJpi Mlftl# [•i^n [•IfW MiiM ItW*] us- .4"/1 ?KJ. a-yOvO CITY of ORONO Munici^ Offkes INist Omre Box 66 Cnslai Rj%, Minncvila 55315 January 14, 1993 Mayor Skip Johnson City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mayor Johnson: Orono has reviewed your suggested shoreland regulations and the flexibility requests contained in your submission. We find no reason to obiect to them. We will also be expressing our view separately to the DNR. It appears to us that the DNR should be pleased at the time and effort made to meet objectives wnile dealing realistically with the current and prospective state of development in your community. / . Diann Goetten Acting Mayor .TDG/ch TEixfHOM; - r«»Tci«] itjTiira ratlin ^T:I: Ml rattr« - V. ^ Wfl^ •1C«] 1*^ Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 3 January 22, 1993 Page 2 - Revised Submittal I am planning to not send a revised application/information statement for a "major amendment", since this was originally submitted as a "minor amendment" and from the City's standpoint, nothing has changed. I will not be surprised if Met Council comes back with a determination that this is a major amendment because it involves 40 acres or more added to the MUSA boundary. However, it is staff's position that this is more or less a housekeeping amendment of. th^ MUSA boundary, and the actual net gain to our urban service area is three residential units (see December 15, 199:^lCT^>*Slfpply/Demand Analysis). Tha ramifications of a major amendment are thct ic will reguire a more detailed review by Met Council, taking up to 90 days, and the City may not officially adopt the amendment without Met Council approval. Staff Recommendation Staff requests that Council review the attached information, and approve it for submittal. Please pay particular attention to Pages 19 and 19-A of the Amendment, which lay out a plan for infiltration/inflow control. Isv CITY OP ORONO RORAL DP 3ITY ANALYSIS Revised 12/16/92 Number of sections exceeding Met Council's upper limit of 1.0 units/10 acres: 14 of 21 2. Average Density: 990 unit3/7188 ac « 10 ac 1.38 units/10 acres 3. Range in densities (units per 10 acres) on a section-by- section basis: 0.38 (Sec. 29) 3.23 (1.0 is Met Council's upper limit) (Sec. 11) 4. Expected density at "build-out" (Yr 2040?): 1800 units/7000 ac » 2.57 units/10 acres 10 ac 5. From an "average Lot Size" basis: - current (1992): average 7.3 acres/lot build-out (2040): average 3.9 acres/lot (assumes no significant zoning changes) Densities Section by section: Non-MUSA Area* (Acres) Number of Existing Residential Units Density (Units Per 10 Acres) Average Lot Size (Acres) Sec. 7~449 53 1.18 8.5 Sec. 3 640 116 1.81 5.5 Sec. 4**589 92 1.56 6.4 Sec. 5 202 19 0.94 10.6 Sec. 6 535 52 0.97 10.3 Sec. 7 72 10 1.39 7.2 Sec. 9 128 9 0.70 14.2 Sec. 10 310 75 2.41 4.1 Sec. 11 65 21 3.23 3.1 Sec. 25 308 29 0.94 10.6 Sec. 26 309 60 1.94 5.2 Sec. 27 290 72 2.48 4.0 Sec. 28 153 26 1.70 5.9 Sec. 29 287 11 0.38 26.1 Sec. 30 300 19 0.63 15.9 Sec. 31 640 83 1.30 7.7 Sec. 32 603 58 0.96 10.4 Sec. 33 360 53 1.47 6.6 Sec. 34 139 28 2.01 5.0 Sec. 35 272 42 1.54 6.5 Sec. 36 535 62 1,16 8.6 Overall 7188 Ac 990 1. 38 7.3 Ac (• (•* Does not include surface waters or existing Ewy 12 R.O.N.) Revised 12/16/92 to reflect Stubbs Bay MUSA revisions rf 1992) I Clearly, our existing overall density already exceeds the 1 unit per ]0 acres guideline. Only 7 of 21 sections have not reached the 1 in 10 density, and these could in tot.il accept approximately 40 additional residential units before the 1 in 10 density is exceeded. The above numbers do not include vacant buildable lots already subdivided. Our latest count indicates there are approximately 70 vacant buildable lots in the 2 acre and 5 acre zones, which could be built on at any time, further increasiung our non-conformity with the 1 in 10 density guildeline. Exclusive of golf courses, country clubs, and park lands, we have approximately 214 parcels of unsewered land that are further subdividable under current zoning standards, with a potential for creating an additional 500-600 buildable lots. However, Orono has not in the past and currently has no intention of zoning for "phased" development of the undeveloped areas, hence we are consciously allowing market demand determine the timing of development throughout the City. 1 December 15, 1992 MUSA Supply - Demand Analysis City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 Supply A.Area of undeveloped/developable land within current MUSA boundary: Section 7 - 35 acres - zoned 1 acre SFR Section 17 - 5 acres - zoned 1/2 acre SFR Section 20 - 5 acres - zoned 1 acre SFR Section 28/33 - 60 acres - zoned 1-2 acre SFR 112 acres (est. of units: 90) B. Number of vacant buildable SFR lots within current MUSA with potential for infill development: 64 (list by 1/2 section attached) C. Total supply within current MUSA = 90 + 64 — 154 units 11. Demand A.Number of total housing units, 1992: 2835 Number of urban housing units, 1992: 1710 Number of rural housing units, 1992: 1125 B. Projected number of urban housing units, 2000: 1900 C. Projected increase in urban housing units, 1992 - 2000: 190 D. Average density of projected urban housing units, 2000. 1.1 acre per unit E. Projected increase in urban housing minus available vacant lots for infill. {90-64 * 126 unit shortfall F. 126 unit shortfall minus 90 units possible in existing MUSA » 36 unit deficit at 1 .1 acre deasity » 40 acre year 2000 demand unlillcd with current MUSA r lU. How does current MUSA request satisfy this demand? Part XII, 140 acres; includes 20 existing residences. 1 vacant 2-acre buildable lot. and the remainder is within Hennepin County's Nocrenberg Park which will supply no additional developable acreage. Net gain = 1 unit. Part XII, 3 acre developed residential lot in 2-acre zone, connected to Long Lake Municipal Sewer System, Net gain = 0 units. Part XIV, 4 acres, split into two 2-acre sewered SFR lots. Net gain = 2 umts. Part XV, 24 acres: will be annexed to City of Long Lake per agreement. Net gain to Orono = 0 units. Net total gain = 3 units Net 2000 MUSA deficit = 33 units = 36 acres. rv. Summary Year 2000 MUSA demand exceeds current and currently proposed supply by 33 units or 36 acres. Infill Potential - Sewered Current MUSA Half Section # of Units Half Section ft of Unit* N-2 0 N-20 4 S-2 2 S-20 3 N-3 0 N-21 3 S-3 0 N-22 0 N-4 2 S-22 0 S-4 0 N-23 0 N-5 7 S-23 0 S-5 1 S-25 0 N-6 0 S-26 0 S-6 •7 S-27 0 N-7 3 S-28 0 S-7 8 S-29 0 N-8 1 S-30 0 S-8 3 N-31 0 N-9 0 S-31 0 S-9 1 N-32 0 N-10 1 S-32 0 S-10 1 N-33 0 N-11 0 S-33 0 S-11 0 N-34 0 N-15 0 S-34 0 N-16 0 N-35 0 N-17 1 S-35 0 S-17 3 N-36 0 N-18 S-18 1 0 S-36 4 64 units o t ; \\ A'^>'|%’)ij'^4.v O >« N CITY of ORONO MufiktpRl Offices Pdsi Office Boil 66 Cn*4aJ Rai, Minnrs«>u 5S323-( January 25, 1993 Steven Schwanke Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 RE: City of Orono Comprehensi\e Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update Plan Amendment No. Dear Mr. Schwanke: This letter is our formal transmittal of information requested in your letter of February 12, 1992 in support of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 3. While portions of this information have already been submitted to you, a complete package is attached. The following comments should assist you in your review: I. Corrected Population/Houeehold Projections (Page 11-13). In reviewing the population and household projections originally submitted, an error in our original submittal came to light. The error was that the number of households reported for 1900 did not include vacant housing units, which gave a false indication of actual housing increases during the periods of 1970-1980 and 1980-1990. Because this incorrect data was used to project continued development at rates similar or slightly decreasing from the 1900-1990 rates, all of the submitted population and household projections were probably too high. The tables on page 11 and 12 have been revised fer re-submittal. In addition the text has been revised to reflect a correct 1900-1990 average of 31.4 households per year rather than 49.6 previously reported. The text will reflect that this rate is anticipated to gradually decline to approximately 25 households per year in the year 2020 (not 2010 as previously submitted). IH !• l*MONr: - » w 4*V4»9ltt F Steven Schwanke January 25, 1993 Page 2 II. Emt' ayment. Projections. Met Council data and forecasts in early 1992 suggested a total employment for ^ 990 of 1,560. In 1991 City staff reviewed existing employment in the City yielding a current employment of 925 at that time. Ihis inconsistency has been discussed with Tim Fleetham of your office, who has revised his figures downward to more closelv match the City's figures. ^ III. Population, Household, and Employment (Pages 11, 12, 16). The tables on pages 11 and 12 have been broken down by major interceptor service area as requested by Met Council. The projections are based on a "best guess" of which interceptor will serve the areas expected to develop with sewer in the future. However, areas of the City currently outside the MUSA line have not been assigned to a specific interceptor service area, and, as noted on page 16 of the submitted amendment, a rerouting of Orono's current Lift Station 60 flow into Lift Station 59 is a possibility, which would significantly change the current projections. The 1990-2000 projections anticipate approximately 125 sewer connections occurring in the Stubos Bay area during the period 1993“x99.. coupled with only minor growth of sewered residential development in the Highway 12 corridor, reflecting recent land ownership changes which place significant portions of the area previous]y expected to be developed as residential, in the hands of institutional interests (City and school district). IV. Population/Household Projected Growth Analysis. The table on page 13 has been revised to reflect the corrected populaticn/hcusehold projections reported above. The revised page 13 table expands on the household/population projection by indicating how that growth is expected to occur, broken down between sewered and unsewered new construction as well as sewering existing development. The table projects that for year 2000 the City will be using 1,900 residential units and 365 non-residential units tor a total of 2,265 units 'a unit is defined as 274 gallons per day). The existing system has capacity for at least 3~, 083 units at the 1980 defined rate of 368 gallons per unit per day, hence for year 2000 there appears to be substantial excess capacity for Orono's needs. The table also indicates projections for year 2010 and at full developnent. The forecast is for 2,400 sewered residential units at full development, leaving a minimum of 683 ncn-residential units av ailable. StevBn SchwankB January 25, 1993 Paqe 3V proiected Flows. development with the actualin order to compare proDected additional table was””'rCrs“rr:srs?:S”S;- -rj.vEsrK;.“.,sr-,■’* “ problem to be addressed. ::T:“on rHe“sr,i.^actnr-w^r=irit~s con.e«ea .o sewe. .n X..X '""'T fhl"f'doze'^ousTs niw Sugar Woods single family development noVth of Highway 12. indicated tire"'"32% ’^;'f ¥:?1 v?-Ta.rHinj;t;rnif conr^eofion^'o' roris^’s^ MGY® t ”241, MOV is mistly 1/1- tlSrugraUn^t/i^Is'^-: w\^«\il^eTy r.!at\^^^^^ a’^Jli. percentage o ^iTnared to be 83/241 or epprolfma^"- ^rth^Jt-rL°r^«^"-w'. nearly identical to the 1981 levels. Steven Schwanke January 25, 1993 Page 4 l/I currently would appear to be costing the City approximately $90,000 per year in MWCC gallonage charges alone, but significantly less in drought years. While capacity is not in imminent danger of being exceeded, future capacity problems are a potential if I/I is not further reduced. City staff will be proposing to the City Council that the 1981 I/I Analysis be updated to reflect current flow data, analyze the extent, sources and possible solutions to the current I/I problems, and identify and proceed with those solutions which are feasible and cost effective. As part of this update process, the City will initiate an ongoing process to continually analyze flow data for City-owned lift stations on an annual or semi-annual basis, comparing actual flow data to the expected flow based on the number of units served by each station, to identify problems as they occur. Additionally, the City will initiate an inspection program to eliminate the illegal discharge of roof water, groundwater, and foundation drainage which may be entering the sewer system via sump pump connections. Such discharges have been illegal in the City since 1984 or earlier. Finally, the City will provide an annual progress report to the MWCC, indicating the extent of problems encountered during the year and a running rec rd of actions taken to solve I,1 problems. In regard to this Comprehensive Plan Amendment Nr. 3, please contact me at 473-7357 if there is additional information needed in order to complete your review process. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Enclosures MPG/lsv ' 'i i A ylTc : ^ METROPOLITAN COUNCIL A/^.jrv park Ccmr,-. 2JO Bjim Fifth Street. St. Paul. MS S5J01 612 2916359 February 12, 1992 Mr. Michael GafTion ppo g 1292 Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE; City of Orono Comprehensive Flan Amendment Comprehensive Sewer Plan Updi'te Metropolitan C icil District 13 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14023-4 Dear Mr. Gaffrem: The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the comprehensive plan amendment received by the Council on January' 30. 1992. We have determined that the proposed amendment is incomplete h)r Council review. The city needs to provide the following information for the Metropolitan Council to determine the plan amendment's impact on the metropolitan .sanitary sewer system and compatibility with respective guide chapters: • location, number of acres, land use tyixrs and intensities of land to be added to the mctro|M>litan urban service area; • number of sewered households and empUiyees lor the years 2000 and 2010 by metropolitan interceptor service area and other areas that contribute to any other city's llt)w through intercommunity agreement.s; metropt)litan interceptor service areas, and the staging of projKJScd changes or additions should be illustrated on a map; • total projected sanitary sewer tlow for the city of Orono and for each metropolitan interceptor service area for the years 2000 and 2010. The submittal presents sanitary sewer projections for the entire city in terms ot sewer units, but not define the flow amount asstKiatcd with a sew^er unit; • minimum st.mdards that the city will use for the control of inliltration/inflow (IT) and the city’s on-going plan for ci>ntinuous identification and correction of I/l problems in the city. Mow data fiir the city indicates that 1/1 may be a serious problem Michael Gaffion Febriiarv 12, 1992 Page 2 copies of the city’s ordinance regulating the maintenance and inspection of on-site septic systems. The Council cannot act on the proprosed amendment until it receives the needed information, and the review period for the plan amendment will not begin until the requested information has been supplied. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Steven Schwanke. principal reviewer, at 291-6594. Sincerely,V., Mary C. ‘Anderon Chair MEA kp cc:Dirk deVries, Metropolitan Council District 13 Lynda Vogc, Metropolitan Council Staff Steven Schwanke. Metropolitan Council Staff City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan i! January 1932 RLVICED JANUARY 1993 31891.1 CITY OF ORONO COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN PART II, CHAPTER 6 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER POLICY PLAN - AMENDMENT Table of Contents I.Purpose II. Scope III. Summary Amendment IV. Proposed Amendment A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. Basic Sewage Treatment Concepts & Principles Sewarre Treatment Policy Plan Surface Water Drainage Districts Existing Sewage Treatment Facilities MUSA Line Revisions Community Management Plan Population/Rousehold/Employra'int Projections Sewer Facilities Plan Expected Sewer Improvements Infiltration/Inflow Abatement Ordinances, Controls, Administration & Errorcement V.Consistency with Metropolitan Planning Policies s Guidelines APPENDIX A; MUSA LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS APPENDIX B: FLOW CAPACITY DOCUMENTATION I, PDRPOSB The purpose c£ this amendment is to update *_he Ccmpreliensive Sewer Policy Plan (C.S.P.P ) element of the City or Orono’s Community Management Plan adopted in 1980. The 1980 Community Management Plan was intended to set forth the City's permanent planning goals, policies and facilities plans in the context of the legislative mandate plan for regional needs through the planning period 1980-1990. While Orono’s basic sewage management concepts and principles have not changed, many of the projects and programs anticipated for completion in the 1980s have been accomplished. The main purpose of this amendment is to update the C.S.P.P. to reflect these changes and to provide a plan framework for future projects and programs for the period 1990- 2000. II. SCOPE This amendment is intended to update the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan element of the City of Orrno’s 1980 Community Management Plan, in response to the mandate of the Metropolitan Council's 1988 Waste Water Management Systems Information Statement. A review of past development trends in the City along with expectations for future growth based on current planning policies, lead to revisions in projections for population, households, and employment. These revisions were further evaluated as to their impact on waste water flow projections for the years 2000 and 2010. Private, municipal, and metropolitan system inventories were evaluated and updated to reflect current conditions, including an update of the MUSA line. City waste water treatment policies and goals were evaluated for consistency with Metropolitan Council policies and goals. III. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT 1. Population and household forecasts are updated to reflect the 1990 census data and incorporate City and Metropolitan Council projections for the years 2000 and 2010. 2. Orono's Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and service area (MSSR) are revised to incorporate areas of the City which have been served with or approved by the City for 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. municipal sewer during or prior to the period 1980-1991. This revision also incorporates MUSA line amendments adopted by the City since 1980 and which have received Metropolitan Council tipproval. Changes since 1980 to metropolitan sewer facilities and to Orono's municipal sewer facilities are detailed. Change*' i-i the numbers and characteristics of on-site sewage treatment systems in the City since 1980 are documented. The amendment updates forecasts of sewered and unsewered development within the City. The amendment indicates minor revisions in the City's ordinances dealing with on-site sewage treatment systems, resulting in even greater control over rhe design, location, installation, and operation of on-site sewage treatment systems. The amendment demonstrates that Orono's current controls over septic systems meet or exceed the Metropolitan Council requirements for allowing rural densities in excess of 4 units per 40 acres. The City's plan of action to reduce inflow and infiltration problems within existing City sewage facilities is described. The amendment reiterates that Orono's C.S.P.P. is consistent with metropolitan planning goals. IV. PROPOSED Ai MENT Basic Sewar.e Treataent Concepts Orono continues to uphold the basic sewage treatment concepts and principles defined in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan. Pcotfection and enhancement of the water quality of Lake Minnetonka continues to be a principal goal of Oreno's planning pro^Tram. Orono's urban and rural areas continue to provide distinctly different lifestyles, amenities and services. Orono has strictly controlled development within the 2 acre and 5 acre rural residential zoning districts. Development with private septic systems and wells has been carefully regulated, and with the exception of the Highway 12 corridor which was the subject of a comprehensive plan amendment in 1988, urban development has not been allowed to expand into the rural area. Although the 1930 Comprehensive Plan indicated that the State of Minnesota had dropped plans for relocating an expanding Highway 12 through Orono, recent requests by outstate interests have revived discussions about rerouting or upgrading Highway 12. While it is the City's intent to provide for the necessary safety upgrades to Highway 12, a future rerouting of Highway 12 through rural Orono would not be in keeping with the 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and would require significant revisions to the plan. The City is currently in opposition to any Highway 12 changes which would necessitate major rezonlng within the City. B. Sewage Treatment Policy Plan The sewage treatment goals for Orono continue exacting as stated in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan. These include provision of an adequate safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all properties in the City; the protection of Lake Minnetonka as well as other surface and groundwaters from sewage effluent pollution; and achievement of these goals within the fInancia1 capabilities of the City and its citizens witnout becoming an intolerable burden on landowners or t^'xpayers. The City continues to maintain that the urban and rural service areas are fixed, and that the existing rural area will not be urbanized. The 1988 Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding the Highway 12 corridor resulted in a determination that certain properties abutting Highway 12 and directly adjacent to the totally urbanized City of Long Lake, could not realistically be expected to be developed to rural standards. The rurally zoned areas within the Highway 12 corridor that were subsequently redesignated for urban development had experienced virtually no rural development due to their location and characteristics inconsistent with the character of the majority of rural property in the City. That amendment strictly defines the urban uses allowable within the redefined corridor. As a result of the 1988 amendment, approximately 275 acres or 3.5% of the area of the City zoned for rural development, was allowed to shift to urban uses. The City has no intent to further allow for urbanization of the rural zones, and rural development with private sewage treatment systems and water wells on 2 acre and 5 acre lots continues to be a viable and attractive alternative to the denser, urbanized housing being developed in municipalities immediately to the east of Orono. Regarding rural sewage treatment policies, the City continues to strictly control the design and construction of on site sewage treatment systems to strict prefornance standards. Additionally, each new rural residential development continues to be required to provide full site evaluation of each individual proposed building lot, so that the initial and future sewage treatment needs of each home site can be met on that individual site. The City has adopted the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Chapter 7080 regulations, with minor revisions which will allow Orono's more restr i _• t.ve on-site sewage treatment provisions to prevail. C. Surface Water Drainage Districts Orono continues to develop under guidelines of the Orono Surface Water Management Plan as indicated in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan. Wetland preservation remains a primary goal and policy of the City, providing for natural storage and filtration necessary to purify storm water runoff. This policy is consistent with Orono's intended rural land use planning philosophy. D. Existing Sewage Treatnent Facilities Significant efanges to metropolitan facilities, municipal facilities, and individual sewage treatment systems have occured since the 1980 Comprehensive Plan was adopted, as follows: 1. Metropolitan Facilities. A. Completion of the Orono/Long Lake Interceptor in 1980 resulted in the elimination of nutrient-rich sewer effluent outflows to Lake Minnetonka from the Orono and Long Lake sewage treatement plants. Each treatment plant was replaced with a M.W.C.C. owned and operated pump station. 4 I ! D. The completion of the Maple Plain interceptor in 1984 removed the last of 7 municipal sewage treatment plant discharges into Lake Minnetonka. The City of Orono had originally opposed construction of this interceptor in favor of treatment plant upgrades^ because the excess capacity of the interceptor would be counterproductive to Orono's plans for rural, low density development. As a result of Orono's opposition to the excess capacity, the Maple Plain interceptor was redesigned and constructed at a size which provides no ca ty for use by Orono (M.W.C.C. Project #83-52). C. An upgrade of the Orono/Minnetonka Beach interceptor was completed in 1989, resulting in additional capacity. Prior to this project, peak capacities had been exceeded on a number of occasions, allowing untreated sewage to overflow into Lake Minnetonka (M.W.C.C. Project #85-67). 2. Municipal Facilities. The City of Orono continues to operate a municipal system of sewer trunks and laterals in various non-contiguous sections of the City. This non-contiguity results from a number of sewer projects serving pockets of historically dense development. These sections are broken down as follows: A. SOUTHWEST ORONO SYSTEM. This system serves the Navarre business area as well as the majority of Orono's lakf ore residential areas. The original 6 projects were inct.. led from 1964 through 1979. The following additions and upgrades have occured from 1980 to 1992: 1. North Shore Drive/Scotch Pine - sewer laterals and lift station - 1980; 12 residential connections. 2. North Shore Drive/Highwood - sewer laterals - 1981 - 3 residential connections, plus 3 stubs for future use. 3. Navarre Theater Project/Norther n Avenue - sewer laterals connecting to existing lift station - 1982 approximately 35 residential connections - Included lift station #6 bypass. 4. Carman Street Project (private) - 1984 - lift station and laterals - 3 residential units. r 5. 1984 Forcemain and Iiift Station #7 upgrade. 6. 1989 Lift Station #10 Bypass (in conjunction with M.W.C.C. Project #85-67). 7. Lift Station #8 Upgrade - 1990. 8. Stubbs Bay - 1992 - sewer laterals and lift stations - 137 residential units. B. OROFO SCHOOLS/HIGHWAY 12 SYSTEM. This system was originally constructed in 1967, with gravity discharge to the City of Long Lake lateral sewer system. The following upgrades and additions have occurred: 1. Construction of the Medina/Orono interceptor, (1981) included construction of a forcemain from the Medina Morningside area of the City of Medina. This forcemain discharges to the pre-existing Orono gravity lines in Old Crystal Bay Road. 2. The Medina/Orono/Long Lake bypass consisted of gravity mains linking the original Orono gravity system directly to mains near the Long Lake pump station, bypassing the Long Lake municipal latera.*. system to relieve capacity problems created by Orono discharges. 3. Project #1989-1 included laterals, trunks and a lift station/forcemain to serve exis'iing and future development, both residential and commercial, within the Highway 12 corridor identified in City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2. This project also included construction of a water system and well/pumphouse. Project #1991-2 further extended laterals westward to serve the new municipal offices. C. HACKBERRY HILL SYSTEM. No changes hav^ occurred during the period 1980-1990. D. WAYZATA SYSTEM EXTENSIONS. No Changes have occurred to this system during the period 1980-1990. E. CRYSrAL BAY SYSTEM (1985). This system consisted of trunks and laterals to serve the Crystal Bay neighborhood, approximately 85 residential units. Gravity laterals discharge to an injector station at the intersection of Spates Avenue and 6 County Road 15. The injector station discharges directly to the urono interceptor in County Road 15. F. COUNTY ROAD 15/MARINAS SYSTEM (1980). This system consists of laterals and an injection station discharging directly to the Orono interceptor. This system serves 3 residential units and 2 marina operations. G. MINNETONKA BLUFFS/WEST FERNDALE SYSTEM (1980). This project consists of gravity laterals, low-pressure, small diameter forcemains, and ?n injector system discharging to the Orono/Long Lcke interceptor. This system currently serves 52 residential units, with capacity for additional units. Map 1 indicates the various component sections of the Orono sewer system. 3. Individual systems. Individual privately owned and operated on-site facilities continue to provide safe and adequate sewage treatment for properties located in Orono's rural service area. The Cxty continues to maintain a complete inventory of existing on-sxte sewage treatment systems. The current inventory of system users is summarized in the following table: Existing On-Site Sewage Treatment Systems Residential Residential-seasonal Churches Retail Boarding Kennel Golf Courses Conference Center City Offices Day Care Total On-Sit« Users I960 930 50 4 4 1 1 2 1 1991 1,095 (includes farmsteads) 55 (cablns-most on Big Island) 5 (2 with daycare operations) 1 (nar)cet at Hwy 12/County Rd 6) 1 (approved for sewer per Conp Plan Amendment #1 in 1987 but never connected) 4 (2 of 4 have clubhouse connected to sewer, maintenance operations on septic) 1 (Spring Hill - varies) 2 (5 days/week) (2 separate bldgs) 1 997 1,165 no h (D tf (DP CD H* {» CA sCD O H M-n a•o•tu ► J H H- PI H* H' H* r'► ‘ M‘H' H >.4 H M H* • X H* H‘ • 3 H H*• M H ^ • ft H- • CJN f ^H' •|...tr d o d •t.r r ^ j 1 c ft n n ii) H-d P ►1 1. 4 0 •n o-i 0 g ? X o 5 a Q. JU X O cn ft ft> H-rt ►- o n ^ I rt O UJ 0 Q n c r* 8 Q ?T ir rJ ^*< n r* :r M ^P » r* “•S r» a *tj < d tt» O ir 0 < cn• S S n ^^ in M* d . d tn p;P,M n 7 :r » :c rt u,III d ft) ^ Q 2 Cl H i 8 ^ ?.o ►- v*> P O b >1 OJ S5 H O H > •o H* »< M ID rt H c Hi H n rt I ii H Hu. C' H 8 •< fl /»<• ;i 8- » ■• Q. • ) t *"5 rt *1 cf ► t a to ft H M- d (A I* *< w rt df n H H K o*n e3 PH IP ► j H Oas >O Hr* j=i owo § Or n ►- n 5\\ on 1 m11 \ 6 ' fiiir.^sr«iiv» z: 71 Tii’i «ii f t:I O 0 H (D \X (1> tJ 01 H- •< (0 in d> CO H n Hn ►do M H» Q o »d HI O » Ozo V.RI RK««i\i\f NV*^# tn t*l pa < hinm l:^w S 10 (O CO ir U) 1^ in tn 1^ VO Si C/) Q >-■4 ^3 M <m k'P'.l K'^fl'lfll'li jn^s L-' Os: tr*(n VO nI^ (/) tn W Jd < H On cn O ov CO H Co m 01 K O Jd Os;o I z H (o O O «r> n1< K It* H H O HI H vn VO cn H W> m H > The use of on-site sewage treatment systems continues to be carefully regulated by the City to assure adequate public health and environmental protection. Each on—sice system is periodically inspected by the City to ensure proper use and adequate maintenance. During the 1980s, temporary summer inspectors monitored existing systems, while full-time City staff performed the necessary plan review, new installation inspection and record keeping functions of the on-site program. In 1980-89, the City i jsued permits for all new septic systems. During this same period, 214 permits v»ere issued 'or repairs to existing systems. The number of existing systems did not inert je commensurate ly with the number of new systems permitted, because during this same period a number of existing systems were abandoned and connected to municipal sewer. Of the currently approximately 1,200 existing septic systems, approximately 15% use mound type drainfield systems due to soil and water table conditions. Approximately 84% use standard trench type drainfield systems. Approximately 1% of the existing systems are holding tanks, due to extremely small lot sizes or site conditions unsuitable for septic systems. As new development continues in the rural area, the proportion of mound type drainfield systems is expected to increase ciae to site conditions. Approximately 75% of all new or replacement systems constructed in the City in the last three years have been mound systems. B. MUSA Line Revisions Existing MUSA/MSSR The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) within the City of Orono was originally established via Resolution #1125 of the City Council on /pril 14, 1980. Legal descriptions of specific areas with the City were de..*ned as Parts I through V of Orono s Urban Services Area. Resolution #1337 adopted November 23, 1981 established and legally described Parts VJ and VII of Orono's MUSA/MSSR Area. Resolution #2131 adopted February 23, 1987 reconfirmed the inclusion of Parte VI and VII, and further added two areas of the 8 city to the Urban Services Area. Those areas are hereby designated as Part VIII (Crystal Bay Sewer Service Area) and Part IX (Fulmer property). Resolution #2437 adopted May 23, 1988 established and described by map additional properties to be included within Orono's MUSA/MSSR, in tv. > distinct areas hereby designated as Part X (western portion Highway 12 Study Corridor) and Part XI (eastern portion Highway 12 Study Corridor). Part XVI, Stubbs Bay, was established via Resolution #3153 adopted August 10, 1992 as Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 4, which received Met Council approval on July 23, 1992. Proposed Revisions of MUSA/MSSR The following additions to the MUSA/MSSR are hereby proposed : Part XII includes 20 properties along North Shore Drive and South Old Crystal Bay Road which were served with municipal sewer either in 1963 (adjacent to original Orono trunlc line) or which were part of the North Shore/Scotch Pine Lane project in 1981. Area includes Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District's Noerenberg Park. Total area of Part XII is 140 acres. Part XIII consists of the 3-acre residential lot located at 650 North Brown Road, which the City allowed to connect into the adjacent City of Long Lake sewer system in 1986. Part XIV contains approximately 4 acres adjacent to the existing 'Wayzata System Extension', which was platted into two 2-acre single family residential lots in 1991. Part XV is a 24-acre tract within Orono adjacent to and oi#,ied by the City of Long Lake. This parcel is subject to a sjittlement agreement pursuant to a petition for the concurrent detachment and annexation of the property filed ‘as are hereby ( Area) and Part Btablished and ncluded within ^ designated as ar) and Part XI esolution #3153 mendment No. 4, 92. SR are hereby rth Shore Drive re served with original Orono h Shore/Scotch burban Hennepin Total area of (sidential lot :ity allowed to sewer systein in adjacent to the latted into two adjacent to and is aebject to a ition for the property filed 1 c I I I I I |II|I ...........- ■ II ~JL lj 1 lOfl l^rTT“cr* T"t4 l: X rcH ! aV>. IkWM m\K _ ___c ■.Tl \\ - ! b.Y/ '/ ,/ % zn. i -.f :l^£ / //// S IZI cz T7 ]TTTr M ^ «=H-4 t-H-mm fn »JkSS mm J -U)L ■m. 4-iiL \ /: X H IAVX~11 /z' j TT *tl *d »d M o» » »i 01 o h M H Mft ft ft ct 10 1 ’ ---------------- »d *U h i (b Oi fb N M M ft ft ft h) *tJ 'T? 0) 01 01 111 M M M fi ft M ft (t ^.TRir x.^^ ^ ! V r /“/'iin*11 y H X X *0 M M ht ti < M M Q • M • *n H X n H • X f ^ w: 35 :i 5^00 5 T ^:i ft 5 5 :5 0 D 3: 2 in u: O in ?t ^ ^ ^ M [i o H cs| fffs-l'.s&Psrr ■ Sirf HI r\ g.u- » bi M at to <» <*. ^ by the City of Long Lake with the Minnesota Municipal Board. That settlement agreement is conditioned in part that the City of Orono successfully completes a MUSA line amendment to include this property within the MUSA boundary. The agreement further stipulates that; 1.The City of Long Lake shall extend sewer and water to the property, which shall be chargeable against Long Lake's allocation for sewer and water units; and 2.The City of Orono shall grant sufficient zoning approvals to allow the development of 13 residential lots on the property. Such zoning approval is proceeding in the form of a Planned Residential Development granting an area variance to the 2-acre per lot density standards currently in effect. Parts I through XVI are depicted on Map 2 and legally described in Exhibit A attached. P ity Management Plan Sewer facility planning in Orono continues to be directed by the philosophy and policies contained in the Community Management Plan. The plan continues to call for development in both the urban and rural portions of the City. By limiting the density of development while preserving all natural marshlands, wetlands and drainageways, the quality and quantity of stormwater nutrient pollution will be controlled. Orono's population growth has been significantly less than anticipated by forecasts in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan. The 1980 Plan projected an Orono population of 8,340 for 1990. The 1990 census population figure of 7,285 is virtually equivalent to the 1980 Comprehensive Plan forecast of 7,290 for 1980. The City 10 is currently projecting a population of 7,600 in the year 2000; 8,000 in the year 2010; and 9,900 at saturation. These figures are consistent with general declines in the birth rate and household size, and reflect Orono's low density development philosophy. G.Population/Household/Employment Projections A significantly rapid decline in the number of residents per household, has resulted in population forecasts made in 1980 being approximately 15% high for 1990. However, the number of households previously forecast for 1990 is within 1% of the 1990 census count for households. The following tables represent the City's forecasts for households and population to the year 2020. These are based on expectations that new construction will occur mainly in the rural area, and on the assumption that the decreasing ratio of residents per household will level off at approximately 2.5 residents/household, A further assumption is that the annual increase in households will gradually decline from the 1980-90 average of 31.4 households per year to approximately 25 households per year in 2020. Employment Projections (sewered) 1990 2000 2010 925*1100«*1300** Ml* 1991 Orono review of existing wor)cplaces Estimate Based on 1988 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1_ _ the year 2000j These figures irth rate and y development: residents per 3 made in 1980 the number of 1% of the 1990forecasts for e are based on y in the rural ing ratio of oximately 2,5 lat the annual 3m the 1980-90 oximately 25 19B0 1990 1991 199^lIOUSEUOtD/DOOSlIIG UlIXT FOnUCKSTS1995 1996 1997 199B 19991991 1994 2000 2010 2020 SaturationYtarQrban Arua 1437 1692 1700 1710 1760 1790 lOlS 1035 '4855 1875 1690 1900 2000 2100 2400(Sswarad) nural Xrat 1016 1095 1110 112S ior.5 1100 1115 1330 1150 1170 1185 1200 1400 1550 1800Total Uoualng Dolta 2471 2787 2810 2815 2B5S 2890 2930 2965 1005 3045 1075 3100 3400 3650 4200Occ nouaing Onlit (No. of tiouaaholdi)2291 2613 2641 2665 2604 2717 2754 2787 2825 20b2 2890 2900 3200 3450 3950-2950 3350 3750 ••KIT COUNCIL 1ST *92 (Total Uoutin9)**Foraon For Daehld 2.99 2.79 (2.77)(2.75)(2.73)(2.711 (2.69)(2.67)(2.65)(2.63)(2.61)(2.6)(2.5)(2.5)(2.5) lat Vacancy Fata 7.4i 6.21 (C%)(60 !60 (61)(60 (61)(61 1 (60 (60 (61)(60 (64)(61) poFUfJ^Tioii roi4i:ci*STS Yaar )980 1990 1991 1992 1991 1994 )995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2010 2020 Saturation Ui)*an Kraa (ScMcicd) 1975 4410 4430 4420 4S1S 4560 4590 4605 4620 4635 4(40 4670 4700 4950 5650 Fural Xraa (Onaewcead) 2870 2855 2890 2910 2815 2800 2830 2835 2865 2890 2910 2930 3300 3650 4250 Total 6845 7285 7320 7130 7110 7160 7410 7440 7485 7525 7550 7600 8000 8600 9900f lOCT COmiCIL (1900)-m ------mm 7500 8200 ••• NIT COUUCIL (1992)•--m -----m 7800 8150 8850 •• ndment Souccoi 1900 Conuuu) 1990 ConuMSi C!ty rccocdsi Prolectiona and fotccdsta baaod an City oatinatos (Mot council pco]octions witoru noted) WMM ' Ml’ The tables on Page 12-A provides a breakdown of sewered household, population and employment forecasts by major interceptor service area. Lift Station 59 serves all of southwest Orono's commercial and residential development, plus the City of Minnetonka Beach, and is located at the former Orono Sewage Treatment Plant property on Old Crystal Bay Road. Lift Station 60 serves the City of Long Lake plus industrial, commercial. Institutional and residential development in north central Orono. Connections to the interceptor downstream from LS-59 and LS-60 within Orono also listed separately. Finally, connections directly to the City of Wayzata collector system constitute a fourth listing. H. Sewer Facilities Plan Orono's plan for future sewer facilities continues to be consistent with the existing local and metropolitan sewer facilities capacities. Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2 adopted in May of 1988 described the necessary system improvements to accomodate the anticipated commercial and residential growth resulting from that Amendment. The table below and that on Page 13 provide an update of projected development in the City related to sewer system design capacities. ORONO FROJECTEO FLOWS - HCD Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 Saturation Design Caoacity LITT STATICS 59 Re*.0.41 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.51 - Non-Rea.0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 - Total 0.45 0.49 0.50 0.50 o.ss 0.89 MGD* LIFT STATION 60 Re*.0.01 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.10 - .Son-Re*.o.os 0.06 o.oa O.OB 0.08 • Total 0.06 O.Of 0.12 0.14 o.ia 1.10 .MCO* downstream 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 - INTERCEPTOR Non-Re*.0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 — Total 0.04 o.os o.os 0.05 o.os - HAF2ATA 0ZREC7 R«s.O.Ol 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 - Non-Rat.0.01 0.01 0.01 O.OX 0.01 - Total 0.02 O.02 0.02 1 o 1 •1 o 1 110.02 - TOTAL* MCO 0.57 0.64 0.69 0.71 O.iO TOTAL MCY 201 334 252 259 292 414** 1 unit • 1 household • 274 CPO •include* c*p*clty for other aninicipelitlee ••per If to Comprehenei/e Plan (30iJ onxte M Gsl/%tnlt x 315 days) X>V»«r; M I > y«ar 1S80t.t. 59 (Orono) L.8« iO IL.L.) Do%#nttratB Vaysata Dirac*; Total 1437 19901480 30 126 56 1692 19911484 34 136 56 1700 Year 1980 L«8» 59 (Orono) 60 CL.L.) Dowfiatraaa Waytati Diract 1990 3870 80 330 150 1991 3868 88 338 146 88EAKD0WN by SEHVICE AREASBEHEHED IIOOSEHOI.0 rOBECASTS (IMCUJDES VACAMT 1992 199114tta 1527 40 50 12fi 126 S6 57 1710 1760 SEWEBED POPULATION POBECASTS IMi 1991 1994 1995 1996 UNITS)1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2010 2020 Saturation1550 55 1569 60 15B4 65 1599 "0 1612 •J'i 1622 1630 1660 1690 1855 128 57 ......M 128 58 128 58 128 58 / 3 130 58 ea ea an ns bb 80 130 58 82 135 58 145 135 60 215 135 60 350 135 60 1790 1815 1035 1855 1U75 1090 1900 2C00 2100 2400 1997 1998 3846 103 326 145 3918 128 323 146 3949 140 336 145 3967 152 324 147 Total 8/81 Factor Vacancy Rata 3976 163 331 145 3983 174 319 144.. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .. 145 144 143 3975 4430 4430 4Aoa AK%m _ _ 3975 2.99 7.41 3906 185 321 143 4430 2.79 6.21 4430 2.77 61 4420 2.75 61 4515 2.73 61 4560 2.71 61 4590 2.69 61 4605 2.67 61 4620 2.65 61 4635 2.63 61 1999 3983 196 319 i42 •....a. 4640 2.61 61 2000 4010 200 318 142 4670 2.6 61 2010 3900 341 317 142 '....a 4700 2.5 61 2020 Saturation 3985 4370 506 822 317 317 142 • I4i 4950 2.5 6% 5650 2.5 61 Yaar 1980 SEWERED EMPI.OYMEMT FORECASTS t.8. 59 (Orono) t.i. 60 (L.L.) Dowiiitraas Wayaata Diract Total 1990 295 605 30 10 940 1991 295 640 30 10 1992 1991 1994 1995 2000 680 30 10 ... .lie. 690 10 10 310 700 10 10 315 705 10 10 315 710 10 10 320 720 10 10 320 730 10 10 325 740 10 10 w w ft# ft# 330 750 10 10 aOIs 1020 1030 1040 1045 1060 1070 1085 1100 2010 350 930 10 10 1300 2)20 Situration *P«r Hap 1 Batweon Pp. 7-81 t !• " Service Areaa 1-2-3-4-5-6-14 59 - Service Areaa 7-8-15-16 oo%#natreajR - Service Areaa Pt. 11-12-13 Wayzata * Service Areaa 9-10-Pt.ll If u V eip.citui!*•" of projected . velopment In the City rej.ted to leuer aytte. de.l,nMarch 1991 PROJKCTID SBWB* FACILITY USB AMO DBSIGB CAPACITYPOPULATIONSawer Septic Total TOTAL HOUSBUOLDS (Inculdlng Vacant) Sawer Septic Total SBWBR UNITS Bale Non-Raa. Total Capacity BUSTING DBVBLOPNBHTt 1960 - 1990 1960 Actual 1970 Actual 1980 Actual 1990 Actual 0 5643 564 t*0 1700 1700 2360 4427 6787*746 1400 2146*746 3975 2870 6045»1437 1036 2473 1437 4430 2855 7285*1692 1095 2787*1692 •final canaas data 295 1987 2920 Metro Total .?Qg*CA3T DBVBLOPMBHtJjn" 0BCADK 1990""2000 Growth Batiaata ♦ 550 -335 ♦ 215 ♦ 308 -195 ♦ Hi ♦ 308 ♦ 10 ♦ 318 -170 Orono Batlaateei -Daw Conatructlon ♦ 68 ♦ 695 ♦ 763 ♦ 78 ♦ 235 ♦ 313 ♦ 28 ♦ 65 93 -Saver Bxlatlnf 3eyelopaant ♦ 317 -317 -♦ 130 -130 -♦ 130 ♦ 5 135 Orono Cat Grovth ♦ 385 ♦ 378 ♦ 763 ♦ 208 ♦ 105 ♦ 313 se ♦ 70 228 *-163 ♦ 170 ♦ 163 Metro Bstiaate Orono Betlaata* 5000 4670 3500 3930 7500 7600 2000 1900 YBAR 2000 BSTIMATB 900 1200 2900 3100 2000 1900 300 3 65 2300 2265 790 818 3090 3083 Metro Total FOR B CA ST PBVBLOPMBW T TW^dIcADI 2000~"20To Growth Citliettot ♦ 000 -100 ♦ 700 ♦ 400 -100 ♦ 300 ♦ 400 ♦ ^5 ♦ 415 * -Haw Conatructlon ♦ 2B0 ♦ 420 ♦ 700 ♦ 120 ♦ 180 ♦ 300 ♦ 120 ♦ 35 I5S -Sawar Bxlatlng Oevalopaant ♦ 70 -70 -♦ 30 -30 -♦ 30 ♦ 0 30 Orono Bat Growth ♦ 350 ♦ 350 ♦ 700 ♦ 150 TBXB ♦ ISO 9riFd“ ♦ 300 ♦ ISO ♦ 35 185 Metro BotlKeto Teoo 2400 8300 B B ^ W 2400 « U 1 u 800 H S T 1 M A « S S'* jO 2400 315 2715 375 3090 4700 3300 8000 2000 1400 i400 2000 400 2400 683 3083 Orono Betlnate 5650 4250 '?905 FORBCA8T DBVBIOPHKMT AT SATURATION ITSo24001800 24^ 683 7^83 3083 Sourcei )^^^-1990 Exletlngi City recorda of actual aawered Houeeholds and on-elta ayeteaer D S Canada 1960-I990f 2000-2010 PopuI•11on/Bouaaho Id foracaatai Metropolitan Council projectiona U988) and City Orono orolactlona of conatrucrion n««4#eee ^tnt.rc.pror^m.i • Raflceta daoreaae In | of paraona par household froa 2.70 to 2.6 •• Reflects dacraaso In • of persona par houaahold fron 3.6 to 2.5 Existing reserve capacities are expected to gradually decrease as flow increases continue to occur in four categories: 1, Increased flow from existing non-residential users. Infill urban development. New urban development, including commercial and multiple family residential development in the Highway 12 corridor. Service to selected existing rural clusters if problems occur. 2. 3. 4. The 1980 Comprehensive Plan provided a framework for idertifying and resolving existing sewage treatment problems in pre-existing rural housing clusters. Five clusters identified in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan were the subject of Alternative Waste Management Studies in the period 1980 to 1990, resulting in all five clusters being served with municipal sewer laterals discharging to existing MWCC interceptors. Based on a 1979 study conducted as part of the on-site inspection progrrm, municipal seweis were recommended for the Minnetonka Bluffs - West Ferndale (Brown's Bay) area as well as the North Shore Drive/Scotch Pine area. Completion of those lateral systems occurred in 1981. As a result of an Alternative Waste Management Study completed for the Crystal Bay neighborhood of Orono in 1985, municipal sewer installation was recommended for approximately 85 existing residences on small lots. Municipal sewer laterals and an injector station were completed to serve these properties in 1986. The last area to be considered for alternative waste management options was the Stubbs Bay area. The study completed in February 1988 recommended that approximately 80 existing residences on substandard lots and an additional 10 to 15 vacant 14 : substandard lots in single separate ownership be provided with municipal sewers. The Stubbs Bay Sewer Project Area was expanded in early 1992 to include the rural housing cluster identified as "Cygnet-Leaf", plus the lakeshore development known as "Oxford Road", The total project area comprises 125 existing residences and 12 interspersed vacant lots, for a total of 137 units, which will discharge into the existing City lateral system on Tonkawa Road (L.S. 59). This project began construction upon Metropolitan Council approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment #4, Stubbs Bay MUSA Bonding Amendment, in July 1992. Assessment appeals were greatly reduced due to an "up front" 35% City participation in the project costs. Alternative waste menagement studies completed in the 1980s have carefully considered the optional solutions for treatment difficulties enumerated in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan. In each case, the relative proximity to the existing sewer trunk lines or interceptors has made the option of sewer lateral installation the most feasible solution. A number of rural clusters of existing development have a potential for further septic system problems due to lot sizes less than the 2 acre minimum and marginal soil/topographic conditions. .These clusters will be monitored closely to ensure continued adequate sewage treatment and disposal. If problems occur which cannot be solved through on-site methods, alternative waste management studies will be conducted to determine the best possible solutions. These clusters are identified in detail in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan and ii.clude: 1.Bay Ridge 6.Orono Orchard Road 2.Poxhill 7.East Long Lake Road 3.Webber Hills 8.North Long Lake 4.Fox Ridge 9.Country Club 5.Bracketts Point 10.Chippewa Lane i_____3 I. Expected Sewer Improvements Based upon the existing sewer facilities, the Metropolitan interceptor capacity assigned to Orono, and the foregoing alternative waste menagement studies, the following improvements as shown on Map 3 are expected to be constructed in the period 1993-2010: 1. Highway 12 interceptor - construe*, ion of gravity or forcemain interceptor to accommodate anticipated flows from future development along Highway 12. Expected construction: 1994-1998. Possible options may include: A. Construction of a gravity interceptor parallel to and in addition to the existing Long Lake bypass. B. Replacement and enlargement of the existing Long Lake bypass. C. Rerouting of all flows from Medina and Orono from the current connection to the Long Lake bypass, down Old Crystal Bay Ro.-d to the Orono pump station. 2. Garden Lane - private developer extension of gravity sewer laterals to serve 10-20 new residential units within the MUSA. Expected construction year: 1995. 3. Baldur Park — private developer extension of gravity sewer lateral service to serve four rew residential units within the MUSA. Expected 'construction year: 1995. 4. Highway 12 corridor - municipal lateral construction to serve further Institutional/commercial development expected to occur within the Highway 12 corridor areas per Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2 (1988). Expected construction year: Ongoing 1993-2010. t« t«l| IP * Metropolitan the foregoing g improvements in the period of gravity or ted flows from 3 construction: or parallel to B bypass* existing Long and Orono from e bypas 8» down tation. ion of gravity il units within Icn of gravity idcotial units : 1995. construction to Lofsssnt espoctad Jor areas per i). lapected 1 S 1,4 . ! f ;:m 11 ^ iiui to 7 Mi yi ’r III :.|i|] J il—Yf: qiaf f| )\r~dmy/.L r H nh Cl a __(::V_ - J (jj I ><rvi rN R'' -^lll ^J8EK3riPVfiei!'.nr«f 1^ 1 1 L P2 V im&fliffYvnwr / // ti.Ajrrvw T’' 5. Existing individual system improvements - the on-site management program is expected to continue enforcing major improvements to» or replacemen'f of» 15-20 existing on~site systems each year through the 1990-2010 period. Expected Sewer Connections and On-site Installations/ 1991-2000 ESTIMATED CONNECTIONS TO SANITARY SEVIER 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 TOTAL 1980-90 TOTALS NEWLY CONSTRUCTED UNITS 6 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 86 190 EXISTING UNITS NEWLY SEWERED 2 2 40 20 15 10 10 10 10 5 124 175 TOTAL SEWER UNITS 10 10 50 30 25 20 20 20 15 10 210 365 ESTIMATED ON-SITE INSTALLATIONS 1 NEWLY CONSTRUCTED UNITS 5 10 25 35 35 30 30 30 25 25 250 300 REPLACEMENT OR MAJOR REPAIRS 30 30 20 20 20 15 IS 15 15 15 195 210 TOTAL ON-SITE UNITS 35 iO 45 55 55 45 45 45 40 40 445 510 J. Infiltration/Inflow Abatement In 1901, Boncstroo and Associates completed an infiltration/inf lew (I/I) analysis of the Orono sanitary sewer collection systen.. This report was in response to the Water Pollution Control amendments of 1972 and the Clean Water Act of 1977. The study determined the degree of excessive infiltration/inflow to the system and recommended abatement measures. infiJuration is defined as the water entering a sewer system and service connections from the ground through such means as, but net limited to, defective pipes, pipe joints, connections, or i I manhole walls. By contrast, inflow is water discharged into a sewer system and service connections from such sources as roof leaders, cellar, yard, and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole lids, storm waters, surface run-off, street wash waters, or drainage. Although some infiltration and inflow is inherent in any constructed sewer system, the objectives of reducing excessive infiltration/inflow are: 1. The elimination of untreated wastewater bypasses and overflows . 2. A lower total cost of treatment works. 3. Avoidance of unnecessary treatment works capacity construction. 4. The reduction of total wastewater volume which must be treated. The 1981 I/I analysis, completed strictly for the southwest Orono collection system, determined that 32% of the total flow was infiltration/inflow. The study found that two districts within the study area were subject to potentially excessive I/I. These districts were analyzed from the cost effectiveness of transporting and treating the wastewater versus the location and rehabilitation of I/I sources. It was determined that the cost of locating and rehabilitating the I/I sources would exceed the cost to transport and treat these flows. Based on the conclusions of the report, the following recommendations were made: 1. That the City of Orono initiate and carry cut a continuous I/I identification and correction program. 2. That the City promote public awareness of the illegality and consequences of foundation drains discharging to the sanitary sewer system. 18 IL Because the City of Orono sanitary sewer collection system has been constructed from a variety of piping materials and is located in variable ground water and topographic conditions and as a result of the 1981 I/I Study, the City developed an ongoing plan for abatement of infiltration and inflow. This plan included the following: 1. Routine and onging televising of the system. Where televising indicates sources of infiltration, chemical injection treatment is applied to the source to eliminate the infiltration. This procedure has proved especially effective in the older clay tile portions of the system which are subject to a relatively high potential rate of joint failure and contain a relatively high number of joints. 2. Ongoing visual inspection of manholes, and installation of neoprene lines where they would prove effective in reducing infiltration. 3. Installation of manhole guards, a system which eliminates surface water inflow into manholes subject to occasional inundation. 4. Use of state-of-the-art technology (Ten State Standards) in the design and construction of all new sewers added to the system. The goal of this plan was to limit I/I to no more than 25% of the total flow, and reduction be lew 25% in all locations where feasible and practical. During the period 1981-1991, MWCC measured-flows varied significantly from year to year, with the lowest flows occurring during drought years. Analysis of the flow rates suggescs that in wet years, I/T may still be as much as 1/3 of the total flow. It is estimated that for 1991, 33% of the total flow was I/I, costing the City an estimated $90,000 in excess MWCC treatment charges. In order to further reduce I/I in a cost-e. ;tive manner, the City will embark on an accelerated program to identify and eliminate I/I sources, including the following: 1. Review and update the 1981 I/I analysis. The update will include not only additional analysis of those areas studied in 1981, but will analyze flow data from all currently existing portions of the system not covered in that study. 2. As part of this update, each City-owned lift station will be analyzed as to the extent of its service area, and past flow data will be compared with expected flows in order to identify and isolate any existing I/I sources. 3. Flow data from City-owned lift stations will then continue to be collected and analyzed on a quarterly basis to quickly identify and eliminate any new sources of I/I that may occur. 4. Continuation of current system rehabilitation progreun as funding permits. 5. Immediate initiation of a public education program regarding the need to eliminate illegal connections. 6. Adoption of ordinances which provide for penalty for illegal connections of sump pumps and foundation drains to the municipal sewer system, supported by a proactive progreun of visual inspection of residential connections, starting in areas where system analysis indicates the greatest likelihood that flow reduction can be accomplished. 19-A 7. The City will henceforth submit an annual progress report to the MWCC, indicating ongoing activity by the City in reducing I/If and including a review of problems encountered and actions taken to resolve them. K. Ordinances# Controls# Administration and Enforcement The City of Orono began regulating on-site sewage treatment systems in 1961. Municipal sewer connections have been regulated since 1964# the year that the first municipal sewers were available. A number of ordinances applicable to sewage treatment in the City are listed in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan. The following ordinances adopted since 1980 apply to sewage treatment in the City: Ordinance #246 - December 30# 1982 REGULATING SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS ON LAKE MINNETONKA ISLANDS, including minimum requirements for seasonal residential properties. Ordinance #34# 2nd Series - April 27# 1987 ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES for properties connecting to municipal sewer but not previously assessed. Ordinance #100, 2nd Series - February 10, 1992 RELATING TO ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, this ordinance adopts MPCA Chapter 7080 standards and is a comprehensive update amendment of Ordinance #210 adopted in 1978. 19-B V. CONSISTENCY WITH METROPOLITAN PIANNING POLICIES & GUIDELINES I A. Population, Household and Employment Forecasts The City of Orono estimates for population and households in the year 2000 are approximately 10% greater than the estimates provided by Metropolitan Council. The City predicts that the rate of growth in the number of households will gradually decrease from the relatively high levels of the 1980*s. However, because most of the growth is anticipated in the rural zones, the number of dedicated residential sewer units will not exceed Met Council estimates for the year 2000 or the year 2010. A 1991 study of existing sewered employment indicated levels somewhat higher chan predicted by the Metropolitan Council. With the Highway 12 Corridor Amendment approved in 1988, sewered employment is expected to grow modestly in the next two decades at approximately 2% per year . B.Sewered Population, Housing, Flows I •ployment and Waste%/ater The City of Orono forecasts that sewered population in years 2000 and 2010 will be equivalent to or slightly lower than predicted by Metropolitan Council projections. Similarly, Orono forecasts that sewered households will be slightly less than Met Council projections, because the bulk of residential growth in the City will likely be in rural zones. Potential multiple family development in the Highway 12 Study Corridor, approved in the 1988 Comprehensive Plan Amendment, may contribute to sewered population household numbers being very near the Met Council estimates. Approximately 93% of Orono's total employment is sewered. As noted above, sewered employment is expected to increase because of the 1988 Comprehensive Plan Amendment which allowed for approximately 60 acres of additional commercial retail development along Highway 12. The additional wastewater flows anticipated from this development were approved by the Met Council in 1988, and no other significant land use revisions for neighborhood sewer retrofit projects will significantly affect projected wastewater flows. D. Rural Area Density k The Metropolitan Council requires that local governments allowing densities in excess of 4 units per 40 acres shall incorporate MPCA Regulations Chapter 7080, keep permit records, license contractors, require correction of existing system problems, provide trained personnel, and incorporate post installation inspection and maintenance as part of their on-site system management controls, Orono’s current on-site system management program, initiated in 1978, contains each of these elements, and therefore is consistent with Metropolitan Council requirements for management of individual on-site sewage treat ment and disposal systems. E. Private Wastewater Treatment Plants The City of Orono currently has no private wastewater treatment plants which discharge to surface waters. Consistent with Metropolitan Council guidelines, under no circumstances will such private wastewater treatment plants be allowed in the City of Orono. Any changes in this position are acknowledged to require a future Comprehensive Plan Amendment. F. MUSA Line Revisions The MUSA line revisions proposed with this eunendment merely update the boundaries to include existing sewered development, or provide for minimal increases in expected wastewater flows. The addition of these areas to the Urban Service Area does not require any changes in Metropolitan Systems, and therefore is consistent with Metropolitan Council policies. •i APPENDIX A MUSA LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS L PART I (NAVARPE/FOREST LAKE/TONKAWA) Commencing on the west line of Section It T 117 N/ R 23 W, 1628.66 feet south of the northv>rest corner; thence easterly 400 feet parallel with the north line of the southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 Section 7; thence northerly 300 feet parallel with the west line of Section 7 to the north line of the southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4; thence easterly along the north line 365 feet + to a point on the centerline of Highview Avenue 30 feet south of the southwest corner Lot 96 Tonkaview Gardens; thence northerly 558.5 feet along the west line of Lot 96 to the northwest corner; thence easterly 568 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 95; thence south along the east line of Lot 95, 554.7 feet to a point on the centerline of Highview Avenue 30 feet south of th^ southeast corner of Lot 95 Tonkaview Gardens? thence easterly 664.8 feet along the south line of the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 Section 7? thence northerly 659.5 feet to a point 30 feet north and 30 feet west of the northwest corner of Lot 14, Block 3, Mount Home Additions; thence easterly to the southeast corner of the northeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4, Section 7; thence north along the east line of the northwest 1/4 to a point on the north line of Section 7, 2694.86 feet east of the northwest corner of Section 7? thence east 330.5 feet along the north line of Section 7 to the PC of a curve deflecting south with a radius of 954.93 feet central angle 46 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds; thence 727.39 feet along the curve to the centerline of Orono Road; thence northeasterly along the centorline of Orono Road 111.45 feet to tho PC of a curve deflecting to the left; thence 359.3 feet along the curve with a central angle of 71 degrees 52 minutes radius of 246.48 feet? thence north 26 degrees 39 minutes west 872.45 feet to the PC of a curve deflecting to the left with a radius of 330.65 feet central angle 41 degrees 25 minutes? thence 239.01 feet along the centerline of curve? thence north 60 degrees 04 minutes west. L 106.52 feet; thence south 22 degrees 18 minutes west, 143.73 feet; thence north 80 degrees 08 minutes 45 seconds west, 236.7 feet; thence north 41 degrees 47 minutes 25 seconds west, 131.72 feet;thence north 22 degrees 18 minutes east, 190.55 feet to the centerline of North Arm Drive; thence easterly parallel with the north line of the southwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 Section 6 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence northerly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to a point 330 feet south of the northeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 Section 6; thence north 0 degrees 16 minutes west, 136.9 feet; thence north 58 degrees 26 minutes east, 373.84 feet; thence north 11 degrees 24 minutes west, 63.83 feet; thence north 73 degrees 29 minutes east, 183.32 feet; thence south 7 degrees 59 minutes east, 114.34 feet; thence north 89 degrees '0 minutes east, 156.92 feet; thence south 0 degrees 03 minuto* east 330 feet; thence north 89 degrees 34 minutes east, 655.68 feet to the east line of Section 6; thence 330 feet north 0 degrees 08 minutes west along the east line to the west quarter corner of Section 5; thence east along the centerline of Section 5 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence southerly following the shore of Lake Minnetonka to a meander corner on the south line of Section 5, 169.83 feet aast of the south quarter corner; thence continuing south and then east in Section 8 along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the east line of Section 8; thence continuing northeast in Section 9 along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the Noerenberg Channel; thence southeast through the channel; thence southwesterly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the south line of Section 9j thence south in Section 16 following the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka around Bohns Point to the west line of Section 16; thence west and north along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka in Section 17 to the south line of Section 8; thence northerly and westerly following the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka; thence southerly along the shoreline to the south line of Section 8; thence southerly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka; thence easterly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the east line to the southeast corner of Section 17; thence east along the north line of Section 21 to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka; thence south and east along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the Narrows; thence southwesterly through the Narrows to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka; thence westerly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the west line of Section 21; thence northwest along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka in Section 20; thence southwest along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka; thence southeasterly around Casco Point; thence northwest along the shore of Lake Minnetonka, to a point on the south line of Section 17, 2251.8 feet west of the south quarter corner of Section 17, thence east 268.25 feet along the south line; thence northerly 593.32 feet to the south right-of-way line of the Barlington Northern Railroad; thence nortiieast 665.24 feet along the south right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad to the west line of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 Section 17; thence northerly 102.28 feet; thence northeast 100.24 feet along the north line of the Burlington Northern Railroad to a point 98 feet east of the west line of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 Section 17; thence north 424.9 feet along a line 98 feet east and parallel to the west line of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 Section 17; thence west 98 feet to the west line; thence north 895 feet along the west line of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 Section 17; thence east 1040 feet + to the centerline of County Road 19; thence northerly along the centerline of County Road 19 to a point 33 feet + west of the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Wileys Park; thence northerly along the centerline of County Road 19 to a point 33 feet + west of the northwest corner of Lot 36, Shadywood Addition, Section 17, T 117 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Thence northwesterly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to the west line of Section 17, T 117, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence southwest around Fagerness Point; ther.ee northeast to the east line of Section 18; thence northerly in Section 17 to the east line of Section 18; thence northwesterly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to the south line of Section 7; thence westerly in L Section 7 to the north line of Section 18; thence westerly in Section 18 to the south line of Section 7; thence northwesterly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to the west line of Section 7, T 117r R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence north along the west line to the point of beginning and there terminating. PART II (ORONO SCHOOLS/INDDSTRIAL PARK) Commencing on south quarter corner of Section 28, T 118 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence north 750 feet along the center of Section 28; thence west 900 feet parallel with the south line of Section 28; thence south 750 feet parallel with the centerline of Section 28 to a point on the south line 900 feet + west of the south quarter corner; thence south in Section 33 parallel with the centerline of Section 33 to a point on the south line of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 33, 900 feut west of the center of section line; thence east along the south line of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter to the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter Section 33; thence south along the west line of the northeast quarter to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter; thence east along the south line of the northeast quarter of Section 33, to a point 1089 feet west of the east line of the northeast quarter; thence north parallel with the east line to the north line of the south one-half of the northeast quarter of Section 33; thence west along the north line of the south one-half of the northeast quarter to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 33; thence north along the west line of the northeast quarter to the point beginning and there terminating. J PART III L (HACKBERRY) Commencing on the southeast corner of Section 33f T 118 N, R 23 Wr Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence north 1321.6 feet along the east line; thence west 559.22 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Daniels Long Lake Heights; thence south 1321.54 feet to a point on the south line of Section 33; 659.22 feet west of the southeast quarter; thence east to the point of beginning and there terminating. PART IV (HERRICK CIRCLE) Commencing on the northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Herrick Circle, Section 36, T 118 M, ?. 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence south 82 degrees 36 minutes 04 seconds west, 765.08 feet to the centerline of Long Lake Road; thence south 49 degrees 25 minutes 02 seconds east, 112.06 feet to the PC of a curve deflecting to the right central angle 11 degrees 22 minutes and radius of 2000 feet; thence 397.06 feet along the curve; thence along the centerline of Long Lake Road to the intercept with the east line of the southwest quarter of Section 36; thence north along the east line to the point of beginning and there terminating. PART V (CHEVY CHASB/PERRDALE GREEN) Commencing on the southeast corner of Section 36, T 118 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence north along the east line of Section 36 to the east quarter corner; thence west 1328.42 feet to the northwest corner cf Lot 16, Block 1, Hill O'Way Manor Addition; thence south 1101.4 feet along the west line of the Hill 0'V7ay Manor Addition to the north line of the Luce Line Trail; thence south 43 feet + to the centerline of the Luce Line Trail; thence southeasterly 875 feet + along the centerline of the Luce Line Trail; thence south 60 feet + to the northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 1/ Allo-Rae Terrace Addition; thence south 1171.93 feet along the west line of the Allo-Rae Terrace Addition to the south line of Section 36; thence east to the point of beginning and there terminating. PART VI (MO^. BLUPFS/ORONO LANE/WEST FERNDALE) Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 2, T 117 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County# Minnesota; thence east 330 feet along the north line of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 2; thence south at right anglrs 375 fee\_ + to the centerline of County Road 15; th.ince '00 feet + southwesterly along the centerline of County Road 15 to the east line of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter; thence southerly along the centerline of County Road 15 370 feet - on a curve deflecting to the left; thence southerly along the centerline of County Road 15, 101.4 feet on a curve deflecting to the right central angle 6 degrees 05 minutes; thence south 29 degrees 25 minutes east 65 feet + to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence northerly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to the east line of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter Section 2; thence easterly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to the east line of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 2; thence easterly along the shore of Lake Minnetcnka to the east line of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter Section 2; thence easterly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to a point 235.3 feet west of the east line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter; thence north parallel with said east line to a point IL.A 721.88 feet south and 235.3 feet west of the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 2; thence east 235.3 feet to the east line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 2, thence 721.88 feet to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section thence west along the north line to the northeast corner of the southv/est quarter of the southeast quarter Section 2; thence west 945 feet + along the north line of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter; thence northwesterly 150 feet +; along the centerline of Ferndale Road west thence northwesterly 275 feet + along the centerline of Ferndale Road West on a curve deflecting to the l<sft with radius of 287.42 feet to a point on the west line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 2r 1132 feet + south of the northwest corner; thence north along the west line to a point 965.2 feet south of the northwest corner of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 2; thence 150.5 feet northeasterly along the north right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence 155.C feet northerly; thence 95 feet westerly to a point on the west line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter Section 2 and 741.5 feet south of the northwest corner; thence north 114.3 feet along said west line^ thence west 47.05 feet along the north line of Dickenson Street; thence northwesterly 271.7 feet; thence westerly 115.7 feet; thence south 242.6 feet to the centerline of Dickenson Street; thence westerly along said centerline 994.34 feet to the west line of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 2 and 659.04 feet south of the northwest corner; thence south along said west line 660 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating all located in Section 2, T 117 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota. L PART VII (COUNTY ROAD 15 MARINAS) Commencing at the northwest corner of Section 11, T 117 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence easterly 11^5.09 feet aong the north line of Section 11 to a meander corner at the northeast corner of Government Lot 1; thence south 10 degrees east, 585.4 feet to the point of the beginning; thence south 67 degrees 48 minutes west, 192.97 feet to the shore of Tanager Lake; thence southerly along the shore of Tanager Lake to a toint 300 feet north of the south line of the north one-half of the northwest quarter of Section 11; thence easterly parallel with sard south line to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence northerly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to a point 14.3 feet north 67 degrees 48 minutes east of the point of beginning; thence to the point of beginning and there terminating. All in Section 11, T 117 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PART VIII (CRYSTAL BAY) Beginning at the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, T 117 N, R 23 W; thence west along the centerline of County Road 51 a distance of 474.5 feet; thence north 0 degrees 01 minutes 19 seconds east a distance of 459 feet; thence east a distance 474.5 feet; thence north 0 degrees 01 minute 19 seconds east a distance of 1651 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3, Maxwell's Addition to Crystal Bay; thence northerly to the northeasterly line of Lake View Avenue; thence southeasterly along the north easterly line of Lake View Avenue a distance of 383.91 feet; thence north 54 degrees 15 minutes east a distance of 428.33 feet to the centerline of Willow Drive; thence southeasterly along the centerline of Willow Drive to the extended southeasterly line of 8 J L the plat of Minnetonka View (vacated); thence north 41 degrees 00 minutes east a distance 234.54 feet; thence east a distance 388.99 feet to the centerline of Brown Road; thence southerly and southwesterly along the centerline of Brown Road to its point of intersection with the extension of the southwesterly line of Lot 2, Block 1, "Ora Park"; thence southeasterly along said extended southwestern line of Lot 2, Block 1, "Ora Park" to the southerly corner of said Lot 2; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly lines of Lots 1 and 2, "Ora Park", to the easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence northeasterly to the northeasterly line of Grand Avenue; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of Grand Avenue extended to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka; thence southwesterly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to the extended centerline of County Road 51; thence west along the center line of County Road 51 to the point of beginning. PART IX (FULMER PROPERTY) That part of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 32, T 118 N, R 23 W, lying northeasterly of the Burlington Northern Railway. PART X (HIGHVIAY 12 CORRIDOR WEST) Commencing at the northwest corner of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 28, T 118 N, R 23 W; thence south along the west line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter to its intersection with the center line of County Road 6. the actual point of beginning. Thence easterly along the centerline of County Road 6 to the east line of Section 28; thence south along said east line to a point 675.56 feet north of the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 34, T 118 N, R 23 W, said point being the intersection of Willow Drive and the southerly leg of Dickey Lake Drive; thence easterly, southeasterly and northeasterly along the center line of Dickey Lake Drive to the centerline extended of Pine Ridge Lane; thence southeasterly and easterly along the centerline of Pine Ridge Lane and Pine Ridge Lane (vacated) to the east line of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 34; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 34; thence easterly along the north line of Section 34 to the centerline of Brown Road; thence southerly along the centerline of Brown Road to the centerline of U.S. Highway 12; thence westerly along the centerline of U.S, Highway 12 to the west line of Section 34; thence westerly along the centerline of U.S. Highway 12 to the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 33, T 118 N, R 23 W; thence south 250 feet; thence west 125 feet; thence north 250 feet; thence east 125 feet; thence north along the west line of the east half of Section 33 to the north line of Section 33; thence north along the west line of the east half of Section 28, T 118 N, R 23 W to the point of beginning. PART XI (HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR EAST) Parcel A: That part of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 35, T 118 N, R 23 W lying southerly of the Luce Line Trail right-of-way, except that part lying southwesterly of the northeasterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railway right-of-way. And Parcel B: Commencing at a point in the west line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 35, T 118 N, R 23 W a distance 29.7 feet north from the Burlington Northern Railway right-of-way; thence north to the south line of the Luce Line Trail right-of-way; thence easterly along said south line to the southwesterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 12; thence southeasterly along said highway right-of-way line to a point distant 385 feet north from the south line of the southeast quarter; thence west to the point of beginning. PART XII (NORTH SHORE/SCOTCH PINE/OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD) Commencing at the southerly corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Dicon Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence northwesterly and westerly along the shoreline of Crystal Bay, Lake Minnetonka to the Noerenberg Channel; thence along the shoreline of Noerenberg Channel to the shoreline of Maxwell Bay, Lake Minnetonka; thence northeasterly along the shoreline of Maxwell Bay, Lake Minnetonka to a point in the south line of the north half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9, T 117 N, R 23 W; thence easterly along said south line to the centerline of County Road 84; thence northerly and northwesterly along the centerline of county Road 84 to a point 1237.5 feet south of the north line of Section 9; thence east to the east line of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter; thence south to the southeast corner of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9; thence east along the south line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9 to a point 330 feet west of the east line of Section 9; thence south 40 degrees east to the shoreline of French Lake; thence southwesterly along the shoreline of French Lake to its intersection with the north westerly line of Lot 1, Block 1, Kathleen's French Lake Addition, thence south 61 degrees 07 minutes 32 seconds west to the point of Intersection with the east corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Colwell Addition; thence south 61 degrees 07 minutes 32 seconds west a distance of 702.67 feet; thence south 14 degrees 50 minutes 08 seconds east a distance of 112.04 feet; thence south 57 degrees 46 minutes 33 seconds west a distance of 345.4 feet; thence northwesterly 171.2 feet along the northeast line of Lot 3, Block 1, Colwell Addition; thence westerly 336 along the north line extended of Lot 3, Block 1, Colwell Addition; thence southerly along the westerly boundary of Outlot A, Colwell Addition to the centerline of County Road 51; thence southeasterly along the centerline of County Road 51 to its intersection with the extended southeasterly line of Lot 3, Block 1, Dicon Addition; thence south 30 degrees 57 minutes 44 seconds west to the point of beginning and there ending. PART XIII (650 BROWN ROAD NORTH) That part of Government Lot 1, Section 34, T 118 N, R 23 W lying south of a line drawn east at right angles to the west line of said Government Lot 1 from a point thereon distant 1170.7 feet south along said west line from the northwest corner of said Government Lot 1. Except that part lying easterly of the northeasterly extension of the northwesterly line of Block 3, Town of Long Lake, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PART XIV (FAIRWAY HILLS ADDITION)(PENDING) That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Outlot A, Fairway Hills Addition, lying west of the east 500 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 36, T 118 N, R 23 W. PART XV (LONG LAKE - FLEMING TRAIL ADDITION) All that part of Government Lot 2, Section 35, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the northerly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly the Great Northern Railroad, and the St, Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Railroad), with the west line of said Government Lot 2; thence southerly on said west line to a point 628.32 feet (9.52 chains) north of the southwest corner of said Government Lot 2, which point is the intersection of the southerly right-of-way ' e cf said railraod with said west line; thence easterly along said southerly right-of-way line 496.32 feet (7.52 chains); thence south to a point on the south line of said Governemnt Lot 2 and 479.82 feet (7.27 chains) east of the southwest corner thereof; thence east on said south line to the southeast corner thereof; thence north on the east line of said Government Lot 2 to its intersection with the northerly right-of-way line of said railroad; thence westerly along said northerly right-of-way line to the point of beginning, excepting and reserving the right-of-way of said railroad; That part of Government Lot 2, Section 35, Township 118, Range 23, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Government Lot 2 distant 317.82 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence East along said South line 162.00 feet; thence deflecting left 254.50 feet on a line which if extended would intersect the southerly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad (formerly the Great Northern Railway and the St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Railroad) at a distance of 496.32 feet easterly, measured along said right-of-way line from the west line of said Government Lot 2; thence southwesterly to the point of beginning. All that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter distant 953 feet north of the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence north to the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence west to the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence south along the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to a point 883.08 feet (13.38 chains) north of the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence southeasterly along the centerline of Orono Orchard Road (formerly Icnown as Orono Road) to a point 838 feet northwesterly along said centerline from its intersection with the south line of said Section 35; thence northeasterly 1111.8 feet to the place of beginning. J PART XVI (STUBBS BAY) Beginning at the southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West? thence north along the centerline of Tonkawa Road (County Road 135) to the centerline of Bayside Road (County Road 34)? thence southeasterly along the centerline of Bayside Road to the int'srsection of the centerline of Bayside Road with che southerly extension of the west line of Lot 1, Block 1, Bayside Landing? thence north along the west line of Lot 1, Block 1, Bayside Landing to the northwest corner thereof? thence north 0 degrees 17 minutes 11 seconds east a distance of 550 feet? thence east parallel with the north line of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 V7est to the west line of Riedel Company Stubbs Bay Addition? thence northerly along the west line of Lot 3, Block 1, Riedel Company Stubbs Bay Addition to the northwest corner of said Lot 3, Block 1? thence easterly on a line parallel with the north line of Section 5r Township 117 North, Range 23 West to the centerline of the Luce Line Trail? thence southeasterly along the centerline of the Luce Line Trail to its intersection with the extended northwesterly line of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision 203? thence northeasterly along the extended northwest line of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision 203 to the centerline of Leaf Street? thence northerly alcng the centerline of Leaf Street to a point 263 feet south of the north line of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West? thence northwesterly alc-W the following described line and its extension, to the centerline of Watertown Road? said line being described as follows: ►- A line running from a point in the north line of Section 5, Township 117 iJoi , Range 23 West distant 335 west from the northeast corner thereof to a point in the east line of said Section 5 distant 263 feet south from the northeast corner thereof. thence easterly along the centerline of Watertown Road to its intersection with the extended east line of Lot 2, Block 2, Swan Lake Addition; thence south 0 degrees 18 minutes 45 seconds east a distance of 733.26 feet; thence south 89 degrees 46 minutes 45 seconds east a distance of 330.77 feet; thence south 0 degrees 18 minutes 45 seconds east a distance of 1,044.81 feet; thence westerly along the south l:.ne cf Lot 6, Block 3, Swan Lake Addition to the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Routson Addition; thence westerly along the north line of Lot 2, Block 1, Routson Addition to the northwesterly corner thereof; thence southwe Jterly along the west line of said Lot 2 a distance 170.78 feet to its intersection with Outlot A, Routson Addition; thence continuing southwesterly along the southeast boundary of Lot 1, ulock 1, Routson Addition to its intersection with the extension of a line described as being parallel with the west line of Section 4, Twonship 117 North, Range 23 West, distant 450 feet east of said west line; thence south on a line parallel with the west line of Section 4, Township 117 North, Range 23 West to its intersection with the south line of thw Northwest 1/4 Section 4, Township 117 North, Range 23 West; thence westerly along the li.'e of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the west li,ne of sa'^d Section 4; thence south along the centerline of Leaf Street (County Road 84) to its intersection with the easterly extension of the north line of Lot 11, Block 1, Stlelow's Addition; thence westerly along said north line to the northwest corner of said Lot 11; thence southeasterly along the west line of said Lot 11 to the southwest corner of said Lot 11; thence foutherly along the westerly linc^ of Lot 12, Block 1, Stielow's Addition, and easterly along the southerly lines of said Lot 12 to the southeast corner of said Lot 12; thence south along the J east line of Lot 6, Block 1, Stielow's Addition to the southeast corner thereof thence westerly along thu south lines of said Lot 6 to the southwest corner thereof; thence westerly along the south lot line of Lot 2^ Block If Klitzke's Additionf to the intersection of said south line with the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence northerly and westerly along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka to its intersection with the south line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 117 North, Range 23 West; thence westerly along the south line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5 to the point of beginningf and there ending. L APPENDIX B FLOW CAPACITY DOCUMENTATION L if i Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects May 9, 1991 Ooo G aonrufoa ft ftorrt W ki\tne f( C ft M^rvtni SoryjM ff tcrvM I \#n« f I Cron t Coot f I Tftjrrwt f f f k«f«l G f f lutjrtU C&c«i C/A *v«r A Gswioo f f lan««d WU #b«»< ff Oon«9C ff j»*ty A •ouooo f| Mjrt A Kiman ft ff vtfiMtt T tjjbnwt ft itoom • ftrflimr ff O#^ O Louou ft Trvsmtt ^ frmori f I urtiMf C lynm f I unwt t MMTkl ft $^fynt%r% f A/urrv»\ f I Mjit t Ao#i ff fccim C tuurc aia Trnrut I Artgu% ft H(M>SI0 a wam ft DsTket I fj^morv ff W«rt A Iro f f fhAp J CAfM«« f f nrwM« ft M«r« O ft InomM • Andmorv AIA Cjry f ty«tna>« ff ft I ft4»« G«#vri « f f Amt C fUn«A AIA A^«l U 1^ A iC f jTfy O fr^xmr. ft Crete CA»^ ff tere f OtCKMr ff Giry w «Aonf«\ ff Cnt'iri A Cncusvi U«o M f#iMr»»)# HjfUflU 0»«n City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn: Mike Gaffron Re:Comprehensive Plan Review Our File No. 139 may 1 5 Dear Mike: We have reviewed the comprehensive plan information and have determined that the City will have adequate capacity to meet the demand for the 20 year planning period (1990*2010). The projected demand is for 2,500 equivalent residential units connected to the sanitary sewer s>stem for the year 2010. This would be an average flow of 0.69 MOD for the C>ry The flow from the Orono Lift Station is estimated at 0.55 MGD and the Orono flow from the IO)ng Lake Lift Station is estimated at 0.14 MGD. The current flow from the Orono and Long Lake Lift stations is as follows: Orono Lift Long L.akc Lift Annual Daily Annual Dailey Row Flow Flow Rov/ l9o6 18S.4 0.52 MGD 20.2 006 MGD mi 135.0 0.37 MGD 16.2 0.04 MGD 1«S8 130.5 J.36 MGD 16.0 0.04 MGD 1989 124.7 0.34 MGD 18.6 0.05 MGD 1990 147.3 0.40 MGD 27.3 0.07 MGD The Orono Lift Station has an average flow capacity of 0.89 MOD. The Long Lake Lift Station has an average fliiw capacity of 1.10 MGD. The Lift Station capacities will not be exceed d within the planning period based on projected development. Please contact this office, if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERl.IK & ASSOC!ATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook 2JIS West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota S51I3 • 612*^36-4600 TO:%AMayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers ^ Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning _ January 21, 1993 % SUBJECT:Appeal of Administrative Decision - 2300 Sixth North enue Issxie Applicoints werG issuGci a building permit for a principal residence on January 11, 1993 for the property located at 2300 Sixth Avenue North. During preliminary discussions with applicants, it was learned that the O'Rourkes planned to obtain a building permit for a barn at the same time of the issuance of the building permit for the residence. Applicants were advised that it is the policy o the City to not issue building permits for accessory structures until a certificate of occupancy has been issued for the principal structure on the property. Applicants have appealed to the Council for special consideration to ask that a building permit be issued for the accessory structure to take advantage of the economy ot having general contractor complete all phases of construction for both structures at one time. Prior to the City adopting this policy, staff had to deal detached garage.s, completed before the residence structures, and used for storage purposes for months before principal structures were finally completed and a certificate of occupancy issued. Members may remember the classic or rather notorious case of the residence that took 5 plus years to complete at Stubbs Bay Road and Hiqhway 12 intersection. In that case, a building permit was issued for both a principal structure and a detached garage on the 7 acre parcel. A major foundation was installed for the principal structure and the detached garage was completed within a few weeks The City soon found applicant with family living in the detached caraqe. After many more months and even more legal bills, a permit was issued for the detached garage to be converted and enlarged into the principal residence that remains today close to roadways. The original residence structure was located within the interior of 7 acre parcel. The original foundation was removed and the unsafe excavation filled. Deriod The City has consistently discouraged the keeping of boats and associated equipment on properties where there is no occupant to oversee dock area. Tn rhia case applicants seek to install a barn on the 9 acre parcel. The survey enclosed with your memo does not show the exact r7 location of barn. Lyle Oman has approximated the location of the barn on the survey. In the early discussions with the applicants, staff noted that barns suggest special uses requiring occupancy of principal structure and that based on the complexities of construction, the residence would be completed long after the barn is finished. Animals could not be maintained in barn prior to occupancy of residence because of the need to closely supervise and maintain animals. The staff policy finds that a principal residence exists when a certificate of occupancy is issued. The certificate of occupancy suggests occupancy will soon follow. The issuance of permits for accessory structures can only be issued at that time. This policy has been developed to ensure and implement the intent of the accessory structure code. The O'Rourkes have agreed that animals would not be maintained on the property until they have moved into their new residence. If Council waives staff policy, staff recommends that your approval be conditioned on the following: 1.Animals cannot be maintained within barn nor can barn structure be used for any other accessory use until a certificate of occupancy is 'ssued for principal structure or occupancy of ssidence. 2 .Upon application for building permit, applicants must provide"an updated survey locating barn on 9 acre site with the reminder that if barn is less than 150' from all lot lines that barn can never be used for horse boarding purposes but that a minimum of 75' must be maintained from all lot lines. January 12, 1993 Barry & Robin O’Rourke 15601 Post Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 -9 L' V- III ’ * I <* •j, 'JAN 1'4 1993 Orono Mayor and City Council Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mayor and Council Members, We have recently received a building permit to build a home at 2300 6th Avenue North In Orono. At the time we applied for the home permit we also requested an accessory structure permit. This latter permit was denied due to the city ordinance that states no accessory structures may be built until a certificate of occupancy has been issued. We are appealing this ordinance and ask that you approve an accessory structure permit to enable us to build our barn simultaeously with the house. By being able to build both structures at the same time we can save a substantial amount of money by using the same sub contractors on both projects. Our home builder has agreed to oversee the building of the barn if we can build at the same time as the house There will be quite a bit of finishing work to do on the barn that we will be doing ourselves. By building tne barn at the same time as the house we would be able to have finishing work complete by the time the house is done. We wculd not have any animals on the property until we move in to the house. Thank you for giving our request serious review and if we can answer any questions please let us know. Sincerely, Barry and Robin O’Rourke Q'7S~CtOS • ¥> - 9 / TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 21, 1993 1993 Appointments % % A Several appointments for 1993 were tabled at the January 11 Council meeting. These included the Building Code Board of Appeals and the Highway 12 Policy Committee. In addition the Council has not appointed a liaison to the Cable Commission to replace Mary Butler. I have attached a memo from Jeanne Mabusth clarifying the role of the Building Code Board of Appeals and updating the status of the current members. The Department of Transportation has notified the City that they are completing the Scoping Decision Document for the Highway 12 corridor study and will be scheduling a Policy Committee meeting for February 23rd to review the Scoping Decision Document. MnDOT has requested that the city make an appointment to the Policy Committee as soon as possible so that person ran receive the agenda for the meeting. (0 TO;Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:January 22, 1993 SUBJECT;Appointment of Members to the Building Code Board of Appeals Per UBC Section 204 and as Amended in Rules 1305.0500 The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the Council and Council shall require the Board to meet whenever a resident or builder disagrees with an interpretation or application of the Building Code by the City's Building Official and requests a hearing before the Board. The last Board of Appeals was held approximately two years ago and was requested by Jim Rivers and his builder over the issue of an alternate method for sprinkling his new commercial structure. Please note the Board shall not have the authority to interpret the administrative provisions of the Code nor shall it be allowed to waive requirements of the Code. If an applicant has provided an alternative method of achieving what he feels the Code requires, the Board allows for the review of this method and makes a final decision. The Board functions independently of the Council. The Orono Board of Appeals has always consisted of five members all professionally involved in some aspect of building construction. The current slate recommended for your approval has served for the past few years. All have agreed to serve again as needed. The five recommended for 1993 are as follows: Steve Anderson, a Minnetonka Fire Inspector. Anderson works closely with the Building Department in matters involving use of the State Fire Code. Tom Anderson, the Building Official with the City of Hopkins. Maureen Bellows, a registered architect and member of the Planning Commission. Jim Hanson, a local builder familiar with the City's Building Department and its operation. Theodore Paulfranz, City of Edina Firechief. i i * — I :io i HI I I *®*'*®^ UNIFORM BUILDING CODEofficial after receipt of such notice to make the stnictiitc. or portion thereof comply with the requirements of this couc.(0 Klabllity, Hie building official, or his authorised rcprc’icntativc charged wfith the enforcement of this code, acting in gornl faith and wiihout malice in the discharge of his duties, shall not tlicichy render himself |>cisonally liable for any damage that may accrue to persons or property as a result of any .act or by reason of any act or omission in the discharge of his duties. Any suit brought against the building official or employee because of such .net or omission performed by him in the enforcement of any provision of such crxles or other pertinent laws or ordinances implemented through the enforcement of this code or enforced by the code enforcement agency shall be defended by this Jurisdiction until final termi nation of such proceedings, and any judgment resulting therefrom shall be assumed by this jurisdiction. Ibis code shall not be construed to relieve from or lessen the rcsixinsibility of any person owning, operating or controlling any building or structure for any damages to persons or propci ty caused by defects, nor shall the code cnfoiccmciil agency or its parent jurisdiction be held as assuming any such I lability by reason of the inspections authorized by this code or any jicrmiis or certificates issued under this code. (g) Cooperation of Other Ofriclals and Officers. Ihc building official may request, and shah receive so far as is required in the discharge of his duties, t'le assistance and cooperation of other officials of this jurisdiction. UnSBfo BulldInQBor Structuros See. 203. All buildings or structures regulated by tins code which are structur ally unsafe or not provided with adequate egress, or which constitute a fire hazard or are otherwise dangerous to human life are. for the purpose of this section! unsafe. Any use of buildings or structures constituting a hazard to safely, health or ^blic welfare by reason of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsolescence, fire hazard, disaster, damage or abandonment is. for the puqxisc of this Kction. an unsafe use. Parapet walls, cornices, spires, towers, tanks, statuary and other appendai.es or structural members w hich arc supported by. attadicd to. or a part of a buildtng and which arc in deteriorated condition or otherwise unable to sustain the design loads which ate specified in this code are hereby designated as unsafe building appendages. All such unsafe buildings, structures or appendages arc hereby declared to be public nuisances and shall be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or removal in accordance w ith tlic procedures set forth in the Dangerous Buildings Code or such alternate procedures, as may have been or as may be adopted by this jurisdiction. As an allcrnative, the building official, or other employee or official of this jmisdiction as designated by the governing body, m.iy institute any other appropriate action to prevent, restrain, coned or abate the violation Boird of Appeals See. 204. (a) (General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to Ihc application and I960 EDITION 204-205 ( ■ \ J intcrprciation of this code, there shall in* and is hereby ernted a Hoant nf a iconsLiting of members who arc qualified by experience and * sSSSSiS—.a Violations •onsUuc?t,lLi''l^ '■'"y corporation to erect r •»' X • 1305.0500 SECTKtN 204. I i-wiir»;i ! piw ?fiii 1 ; '!•]■,. I »I j • j UBC Section 204 is amended by amending the last sentence to foUowaS The Board shall adopt rules of procedures for conducting its business and shall render } all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant,with'a duplicate copy to • the building official and to the slate building inspector .within 15 days of the ; decision, n’j i,.(, . t / • n „ •!. . • if.'r rM? 1 I: I • t *»• * .' f »| '• I • • • •» 1305.0600 .SECTION 205.* ,. . t -f r>: •: ■ , .. I i 5 \ •< * * f • if .f I* 1I : f-'jtjw, ■» <i;jfa(;aiii i • |ijr I .Vr * . 1 rl ‘ » I n •* ll^liw !• r. 1 •vt- •’>1.:} L’BC Section 205 is amended by adding a sentence as follows. Any violation' of provuions of this code is a misdeiucanor {Miimtsoui Statutes, section 16B.69).J • I li. i • ••n i II * *.7I J 1 • * **» :*r lii* I w i fi' * I 'M 1^: A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1993 BE IT RESOLVED, by tne City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments and designations for the year 1993 are as follows: APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Acting Mayor Planning Commission Rep. to Council Park Commission Chair Representative to lake Minnetonka Conservation District Representative to Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Liaison AMM AMM Legislative Contact Lead Attorney (Civil) City Attorney Firm (Civil) Alternate Attorney Lead Prosecuting Attorney City prosecuting Attorney Firm Lead Engineer City Engineering Firm Auditor Fiscal Agents Insurance Agent of Record Weed Inspector Assistant Weed Inspector Transportation Committee Emergency Preparedness Director Southwest Sanitary Sewer District Suburban Health Nursing Service West Hennepin Recycling Commission Mayor's Association Suburban Rate Authority West Tonka Senior Citizens Minnesota Police Recruitiiig System 1993 J. Diann Goetten Alternate Richard Flint JoEllen Hurr Ron Moorse Ron Moorse J. Diann Goetten Tom Barrett Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman and Doty William Soth, Dorsey & Whitney Laurel Hersey City of Minnetonka Glenn Cook Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich and Co,, P.A. Ehlers & Associates Duweyne P. Carlson Apple Valley Insurance Edward J. Callahan, Jr. John Gerhardson John Gerhardson Stephen X. Sullivan Ron Moorse Ron Moorse John Gerhardson Edward J. Callahan, Jr. John Gerhardson Ron Moorse (Alternate) I Stephen X. Sullivan Ron Moorse (Alternate) APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (2 Plus Alternate) Euilding Cede Board of Appeals Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition Board of Directors Highway 12 Appointments; Policy Committee Technical Committee Citizens Committee Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1993 Dale WoodLeck LaDean McWilliams Steve Anderson, Mtka Fire Ins Tom Anderson, Hopkins Building Official Maureen Bellows, AIA Architect Jim Hanson, Builder Theodore Paulfranz, Edina Fire Chief Ron Moorse Stephen X. Sullivan (Alternate) Stephen X. Sullivan (5/9/93) Barbara Peterson (5/9/93) J. Diann Goetten (Alternate) John Gerhardson Mary Butler/J. Diann Goetten George Johnson Eleanor Winston John Massopust (Alternate) Gabriel Jabbour, Chair . Vice Chair Charles M. Kelley, Secretary J. Diann Goetten Edward J. Callahan, Jr. JoEllen Hurr APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Lake Use Comr..ittee Official Newspaper Official Depositories/ Investment Vendors L 1993 Edward Callahan, Chair J. Diann Goetten, Vice Chair Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelle/ Charles Schroeder JoEllen Hurr Jeanne A. Mabusth Secretary The Lok'^r and Pioneer Newspaper First r.ational Banks of: The Lakes (Navarre) Wayzata Minneapolis St. Paul Wayzata Bank & Trust Company Marquette Bank, Minneapolis American National Bank & Trust Company of SL. Paul League of MN Cities - 4M Fund Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Inc. Mpls Norwest Bank Minneapolis Twin City Federal Savings & Lean Piper Jaffray & Hopwood, Mpls Dain Bosworth, Inc,, Mpls Prudential-Bache, Mpls Paine Webber, Mpls Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc, Mpls Southern Pacific Thrift & Loan, Culver City, CA Merchants Ban)c, Kansas City, MO FCC National Bank, Willmington, Del Charter Oak Federal Bank, Cincinnati, OH Connecticut Natxonal Bank, Hartford, CT Chase Manhattan Bank, New York, NY ^ • » 1 ‘”1 k V1 TO: FROM: Mayor £*id City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator %eOa DATE:January 21, 1993 SUBJECT: Ci'jarette Vending Machine Ordinance At the Council's request staff has pulled together information related to the City's current ordinance which prohibits the sale of cigarettes from vending machines. I have attached minutes of the Council meetings from early 1990 and a copy of the current ordinance to provide the Council with background regarding the ordinance. This ordinance is similar to ordinances adopted by numerous Metro area cities in recent years. The attached minutes indicate the original ordinance amendment prohibited all cigarette vending machines except in those establishments where minors were prohibited. This would have left Jimmies bar as the only establishment to be allowed to have cigarette vending machines. The amendment as finally adopted provided for a total ban on vending machines. The Police Department has indicated the prohibition of vending machines does provide a significant barrier to the purchase of cigarettes by minors. Lt. Cheswick indicated that although the number of minors entering an establishment such as Jimmies would be small, the requirement that cigarettes be sold from a counter does provide an additional barrier to cigarette purchases by minors. Lt. Cheswick suggested th^.t if the Council were to allow cigarette vending machines in an establishment such Jimmies, the vending machine should be required to be located a significant distance from the entrance and within easy view of the bartender '■ ' ensure it is supervised to prevent use by minors. 1 A / i /MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1990 SEASONAL WEIGHT LIMITS RESOLUTION #2754* It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Petersonr to adopt Resolution #2754, establishing the 1990 Weight Limits for City streets from March 15 through May 15, 1990. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding: Section 125, Highway 12 Well/Water Service Progress, 1972 Shadywood Road, Recycling Program Publicity, K-9 Name Contest, and Financial Health Profile. Motion, Ayes-4, Nay->-0, Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT; City Attorney Barrett had no report. LICENSES ^ , Councilmember Goetten expressed her concern about 3uyeniles obtaining cigarettes. She suggested that Orono refrain from licensing organizations to sell cigarettes from vending machines and perhaps over-the-counter as well. City Administrator Bernhardson said that 5 of the licenses being presented this evening involve cigarette vending machines. The other 6 sell cigarettes over-the-counter. Bernhardson said that there has been emphasis on eliminating the sale of cigarettes from vending machines. He provided the Coucil and Acting Mayor Callahan with copies of ordinances from the City of Shoreview and White Bear Lake. Bernhardson suggested that the Council could approve both the over-the-counter and vending machine cigarette licenses, or allow the vending machine and over-the-counter licenses to exist for only 3 months to provide time to look at revising the ordinance. Another option would be to act to incorporate a prohibition of vending machines. Acting Mayor Cillahan questioned whether the Council could ban cigarette vending machines without amending the ordinance. Bernhardson replied that the ordinance would have to be amended, but that the Council could do that this evening. Councilmember Goetten said that she would like to start somewhere. differentl^Ve"’between vending'” machine’^clgarette over-the-counter cigarette license. Bernhardson said that they could be divided into two separate categories. Councilmember Nettles indicated that he would be in favor of a. 1 i nrr sal« of cigarettes from vending machines. Nettles said that the question is whether the Council should provide notice of their intention to do that. I MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1990 LICENSES CONTINUED Acting Mayor Callahan indicated that it would not seem right to just deny the licenses this evening without any notice to the applicants . Bernhardson requested that the Council make an ordinance amendment to say that vending machine licenses will be issued for a 3 month period. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to amend Ordinance #5.24 to state that cigarette licenses will, be valid for only a 90 day period. Further, that staff is directed to prepare an ordinance permitting the prohibition of licensing of cigarette vending machines. Staff is to bring that resolution before the Council prior to expiration of the 90 day period. Motion, Ayes~4, Nays~ 0, Motion passed. BILLS Councilmember Peterson questioned some of the vendors' to whom checks were issued. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the unidentified vendors resulted from a computer error. It was moved by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by Acting Mayor Callahan, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes“4, Nays-0, Motion passed. ADJOURNMENT 8:20 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Acting Mayor Callahan to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 8?20 p.m. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. ATTEST: y>ITl idrtSthy M/^aallin, City Clerk Edward J Acting Mayo ahan iS minutes of ORONO council meeting of FEBRUARY 26, 1990 Gerhardson as the nrimary representative and CounciImember Goetten to serve as'the alternate for the Highway 12 Corridor Study Technical Committee. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. CIGARETTE VENDING MACHINES , ^ ^ ..v. City Administrator Bernhardson presented the Council with several options to consider regarding cigarette vending machines. CounciImember Goetten questioned whether the Council should delay any action on this until the Legislature makes a decision. Goetten asked if all of the operators involved with cigarette vending machines have been notified that the City is reviewing the policy. Bernhardson replied that the City Clerk had sent a letter to all of them. Acting Mayor callahan stated that he would find it difficult to legislating such an issue. Counci Imember Peterson said that she wouldn't vote to ban them. Councilmember Goetten said that she would restricting them at this time and taking further action if needed. Callahan asked for a consensus from the Council in regard to delaying action until the Legislature makes a decision. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles to limit cigarette mnchlnes pLc.s minors ars prohibited, Peterson noted that it would eliminate everyone but Jimmies Lounge. There was no second. Bernhardson noted that option 4 wa- provided by the cigarette industry to avoid the of cigarette vending machines. Bernhardson said .hat Bloomington and Minneapolis are proposing that option. After discussion of the options, =°“"t“"';'^%te°‘Srotio^ suggested that Councilmember Nettles mcy wish -o make the motion he previously made. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Counci lm^mber Goetten", to i = Ay es-3°places where miners are ?^?h^bited^. Motion, Ayes a, Councilmember Peterson, Nay. Motion pass o. REQUEST FOR SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING i;,hAn seconded by It was moved by ^ j^/^^is ^i tern until the C.D.B.G. SSdSet\"s"dV‘t^rm?ne'd'in M'lrc^” Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. % % minutes of orono council meeting held march 12, 1990 STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED -.member Callahan, seconded by 11 f w w - r Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0, Motion passed. CIGARETTE VENDING . -^son briefly reviewed the status ^ -- - --/ __oF^conded by Councilmember It was ^ettriending machines from Orono. Mayor Goetten, to ban Barrett if there are any legal Grabek asked City Att rn y Rarrett replied that many cities problems with such a cigarette vending Lve passed ordinances Jose cities have been machines. they could probably uphold the ft'irnot- th”e°‘duty' oTIn 4lefted official to do the educating on ihe ills of cigarette smoking. Motion passed. NAVARRE MASTER PLAN presented information to Counc^r^regrdV;r“dre%tfm“"e^“cost t^ complete master planning in the Navarre area.te --- - - Bernhardson tepUed J,^-^-^,‘^-:t.'°"^He"°sairThere may "£e rnt^r^t J\\"%Melo%"mert"of a ?ong term plan. Mayor Grabek said that he ,°°"^®j"the *CUy had somewhat specific plan for that area. LaJk asked what plan be upheld? City Attorney Barrett replied that the best way to provide a - 19 - $ MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 26, 1990 STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED Mr. Olson said that it is obvious that there are properties that are in need of sewer. He said that the City is asking the larger, newly developed properties to support the smaller properties that actually need the project. The Council agreed that they were in review all of the aspects of this project. need of more time to It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table this matter until the April 9, 1990 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. CIGARETT’E VENDING MACHINE ORDINANCE 81, SECOND SERIES It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to adopt Ordnance 81, Second Series, amending Section 5.24 so as to totally ban cigarette vending machines within the City of Orono, effective May 1, 1990. Motion, Ayes-3, Councilmember Peterson, Nay. JOINT COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to hold a joint Council/Planning Commission Meeting for Saturday, April 7, 1990 at 8:30 a.m. Motion, Ayes~4, Nays- 0, Motion passed. REQUEST TO HAVE AUTO AUCTION* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to establish April 28, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. at Martins 66 as the time and place for an auction of unclaimed vehicles subsequent to published notice in the official newspaper and notification being sent to registered owners. Motion, Ayes- 4, Nays-0, Motio" passed. SECRETARY POSITION RESIGNATION-EMPLOYMENT Acting City Administrator Gerhardson requested that this item be removed from consideration. SALARY REVIEW - ASST. FINANCE DIRECTOR* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to -tdjust Assistant Finance Director Linda Walters* hourly wage rate from Level 5, Step II ($11,073) to Level 5, Step III ($11,688) effective April 2, 1990. M'tion, Ayes-4, Nays- 0, Motion passed. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT PROBATIONARY POLICE OFFICER AND PERMISSION TO EMPLOY FULL TIME POLICE OFFICER Chief Kilbo requested permission to hire Mr. Jay Dembouski as a full time officer to replace Jeff Larson who has been terminated. - 19 - ORDINANCE 1 81 > SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5.24 ADOPTED APRIL I, 1984, AND ENTITLED "TOBACCO." The City Council of Otono ordains: Section 5.24, Tobacco is hereby amended by adding the following language. Subdivision 4. Tobacco Products: A. Prohibited sales from vending machines. No person shall s*»ll or dispense any cigarettes or tobacco product, cigarette paper or cigarette wrapper through the use of a vending machine . Subdivison 5. Purchase or attempted purchase of tobacco products by minors prohibited. A It shall be unlawful for any person who has not attained the age of 18 years of age to ^3 purchase any tobacco product. A person under the ag- ^ . of aae who is alleged to have violated this section shall be lubjelt to the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court under Minnesota Statute S-^ction 260.111. In addition to the dispositions othe'-wise provided by law, a violation of this section snail sSbj^J thl minor to a fine of $100.00 for a first violation or $200.00 for any subsequent violation. This ordinance shall become effective the first day of May, 1990. Adopted by the Council at a regular meeting held March 26, 1990, by a vote of 3 ayes, I _ nays. ATTttST: araeS^R. GcabefTr-Mayor i TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:January 21, 1993 Gfly c- SUBJECT: City Facilities Change Orders 5? V/lfo Attached are three change orders related to the city facilities: 1.Allied Mechanical - This is a net deduct of $1,762 due to cost reduction revisions. 2 .Hoffer's Inc. - This is a net add of $787. The largest portion, $622 to furnish a new door is offset by a deduction in the masonry contractor's contract amount. The masoiiry contractor will pay for the door because the opening constructed did not match the size of the original door. 3 .Jansco Caulking - This is an add of $4,520. Approximately one half of this amount is due to the need to caulk the roof edge. This caulking was required because moisture was getting into a portion of the building. The architect and construction manager are reviewing this item to determine which sub contractor was at faulc regarding the moisture leak. If this can be determined, this amount will be charged to that sub contractor . The second half of the change order amount is related to the caulking of control joints in the floor of the public works building. Because the concrete work at the public works building was bid in an early bid process the caulkinr contract was not bid at that time. When the caulking fov th^ remainder of the project was bid, the public works control joint item was missed in the bid specs. This change order accounts for the control joint caulking. All of these change orders are within the project cost information provided to the Council at the January 11 meeting. KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONTRACTORS & CONSlRUCTION MANAGERS Januaiy 6, 1993 r- — ‘ r i t i •: ir. ■' 'JAM' T 1 1993 Mr. Tom Kuehn City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Ciystal Bay. MN 55323 Rc; Orono City Hall and Public Works Buildings K/A Project #4059 Dear Mr. Kuehn: Enclosed arc four copies of change orders for the following contractor(s): Allied Mechanical Hoffer's, Inc. Change Order No. Two Change Order No. Two Please sign all copies and return three of each to Kraus-Anderson. We will distribute to tlic appropriate parties. V’ery truly yours, KR.‘\US-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ohn Davies hoject Man:iger JD/lp Enc. Minneapolis Division 5^5 South ttth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404 Phon«: (612) 3J2-7.181 FAX: i6I2) 332-8739 Equal Opportunity Employer r CHANGE ORDER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EDITION AIA DOCUMENT C701/CM Distribution to: OWNER □ ARCHITECT □ CONSTRUCTION MANAGER □ CONTRACTOR □ FIELD □ OTHER □ PROJECT: Orono City Hall and (name,address) Public Works Buildings Crystal Bay, 55323 TO (Contractor): CHANCE ORDER NUMBER: Two ( 2 ) INITIATION DATE: December 1, 1992 1124.04ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 4059 V Jansco Caulking 6200 South ^linwood Dr. N.E. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S Wyoming, MN 55092 PROJECT NO: ---- --------------------------------------CONTRACT FOR: Caulking/Sealants May 11, 1992CONTRACT DATE: You are directed to make the foilowintj changes in this Contract: 1.Furnish additional labor and material necessary to caulk the roof edge per imeter as directed by job superintendent.Add: $2,220.00 2.Furnish additional labor and material necessary to caulk control joints and expansion joints in concrete floor of Public Works Building.Add: $2,300.00 Total Add: S4,520.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction XUnager. Signature of the Contractc' indicates agreement herewith, including any adjusiment m the Contract Sum or the Contract Tirr 3.950.00 70.00 * 4.020.00 ’^ e The original (Contract Sum) (Cyarawteed h^ax imum CeX) was ..................................................... S Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ...J.1......................................................... $ The (Contract Sum) (Cuaranteed Max imum prior to this Change Order was ................ $ The (Contract Sum) (Cuawnteed Mawnwurw Cost) will be (increased) (deeteesec (unchanged) by this Change Order..................................................................................................................... S The new (Contract Sum) (Cuaranteed Mawimum C<»at) including this Change Order will be ... $ The Contract Time will be (increased) (derraawi) (unchanged) by ( ) Days. TheDateofSubstantialCompletionasof the date of this Change Order therefore is December i, Recommended: 4.520.00 8.540.00 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Mi n.iaanolis. MN 55404 ADORES^v BY DATE Agreed To: .'lAnscT) Caulkina CONTRACTOR Wvomino. MN 55092 a /^/‘Z /r ^ iv DATE Approvea: Boarriian Kreos^J?^■rster and Associates ARCHITECT Mi nn/eapoi^ BY / Aufnorized: "citv of Orono OWNt.R Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ADDRESS DATE nn CAUTION: You should sign srs original AIA document which has this caution prtntad In rtd An original assures that changes will no! be obscured as may occur when documents are reproducad, AIA DOCtUMINT CZtI'CM • CHAMCI 0«0I* • COr«ST*t'CTION MAS a CIMI sT SDIT iOn • (UM 1M0 lOITIO-** • AIA* a ISM * THI AMIRICAN INStlTUTI Or A»CHITICTS, USS MW YO«A AViNtit. N W.. WASHINGTON. 0 C. »«*C701/CM — I9t9 wanNiNO: UnacanMU eOoiocoeytws us. copyrrgm WiD« »<«d la tufc)act M lasal areaaewSan. January 11, 1993 i KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ( ONTKAC rOKS CONSTRUCTION MANAC.tKS ________________ _ JAN 1 2 Mr. Tom Kuehn City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Cr>stal Bay, MN 55323 Rc: Orono City Hall and Public Works Buildings K/A Project #4059 Dear Mr. Kuehn: Enclosed arc four copies of change orders for the following contractor(s): tanseo Caulking Change Order No. Two Pl 'asc sign all copies and return three of each to Kraus-Anderson. We will distribute to tlie appropriate parties. V'ery truly yours, KRAUSANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CO' ghn Daries ’roject Manager JD/lp Enc. Mlnoeapoiis Dtvh»n« 525 S«jth Street, ivtinatapoln. MN 55*'4 Phone ‘6121 332-7281 PA* (812) 332 873«» [quai OpportuniAr CHANGE ORDER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EDITION AM DOCUMENT C701/CM Distribution to: OWNER □ ARCHITECT □ CONSTRUCTION MANAGER □ CONTRACTOR □ FIELD □ OTHER □ PROJECT: (name, address) Orono City Hall and Public Works Buildings TO (Contractor): Hoffer's, Inc. 8933 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis# MN 55420 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: INITIATION DATE: December 22 , 1992 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 1124.04 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: CONTRACT FOR: CONTRACT DATE: 4059 Alum. Entry & Store front, Glass & Glazing May 11, 1992 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: 1. Furnish additional labor required to install stainless steel push/pulls as required according to Proposal Request No. 15.Add: $330.00 2, Deduct for deleting breakmetal enclosure according to Field Order No. 8.Deduct: ($165.00) 3.Add to contract to furnish a new door for opening ClOO due to rough opening size not being correct.Add: $622.00) Total Net Add: $787.00 Not Viiid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Corteict Time. 78,745.00 (3,463.00) 75,282.00. 787.00 76,069.00 The original (Contiact Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) was ............................................... $ Net change by ;areviously authorized Change Orders.......................SI.................................... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was ............... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (increased) (oecreased) (unchanged) by this Change Order............................................................................................................. $ The new (Contract S-rm) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order will be ... S The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is December 31, 1992 . Approved: Boaroian Kroos Pfister and Associates ARCHlTdlT ~ MiJHfeapoli'’- Recommended: Krau.q-Anderson Construction Com; any CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Minnoanolis. MN 55404 _______________ ADORES DATE Agreed To Authorized: Hoffer*s. Inc.City of Orono CONTRACTOR Minneapolis, MN 55420 ADDRESS 7 Date OWNER Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ADDRESS DATE CAUTION: Y^u thouid sign an original AIA document which has this caution printed in red. Id^gl An original assures that changes will not be obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. AU OOCUMtMT CTfl/CM • CMA.sCC 0«0« • CONST«rrTIO*r MANACI m{ST IOITIOH • IUN| lyao IDiriON • AIA* C »*• • THt AMSaiCAN insiiiuti Of AICMITICTS. ir» N|W vo« AW*»UI. NW, WAS min CTO a*. oc. jooo*C701/CM — 19W wsBwmQ: unflcaneeee**ewc^]ms uS eapynfMlaa.an.la aufc**• piaaaiieiaa. i CHANGE ORDER CONSTRUCTION MAN AIA DOCUMENT C701/CM .Jt<^EMENtCEDIT10iV, r‘'.''vTrP 'i '-' \ 1. .'-rviTiia Distribution to: OWNER □ ARCHITECT D CONSTRUCTION MANAGER □ CONTRACTOR □ FIELD □ OTFER n PROJECT: Orono City Hall'^and (name, address) Public TO (Contractor): Allied Mechanical Systems 340 Michigan Street Hutchinson, MN 55350 CHANCE ORDER NUMBER: Two { 2 ) INITIATION DATESeptember 24, 1992 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO; 1124.04 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO- CONTRACT FOR: CONTRACT DATE 4059 Mechanical May 11, 1992 You ate directed to make the following changes in this Contract: 1. Deduct in contract amount for revisions to mechanical system as required according to changes noted in Proposal Request No. 6, Fte vised. 2. Deduct in contract amount for revisions to mechanical work as requirv-^d according to changes noted in Proposal Request No. 10. 3. Add to contract for floor drain added to hoist pit according to Proposal Request No. 8. Deduct: ($1,182.00) Deduct: ($ 918.00) Add:428.00 Total Net Deduct: ($1,672.00) Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Ntanager. , u t Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including anv ad|usirrient in the Contract Sum or the Contract Time. The original (Contract SumlXSiktXiXXJiKiflii'Xi'CJcXKOtiX vvas .................................................. 5 Net change by previously autnorized Change Orders ....................HI........................................ 5 The (Contract Sum) XXXXoEStaXXXKiOTfil'DfXt). prior to this Change Order was ............... S The (Contract Sum) XIQCiiXJiiiiXXXXXKiSXXi) will decreise<XXXXKX^^^ 390,000.00 . (8,086.71). 381,913.29 . by this Change Order (1,672.00). The new (Contract SumI '««iXXX‘X«X'X?CK9f!X5iS¥X including this Change Order will be...5 380,241.29 • The Contract Time will beXX«59»XX3^JfX«X}t) (unchanged) by ( ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as ct the d.ite of this Change Order therefore is December 31, 19 92 Recommended: Approved. gyanc-anHaarerm rnne h i rm rnmp.m-y CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ADORE 12 23-H.Z. DATE Agreed To: Allied Mechanical Systems, Inc CONTRACTOR H^Ufc^hinson ie-|4H2- D a Te OWISER ■Cry s.LaJL. 33:^. ADDRESS 0 MN 55323 DATE .1. noriiiL.,Mt r-«,ru . rnAS- £ • CO*«STft.CTI<>i MANACtvf^r tOltiON • iLVt -JW {DlTlQ.s • ma * iS . TirAvMict^ iNSTiiJn'or AtCHitias, vjs niw yo«» avinui . nw . washincio .n o c aa»G701/CM —19«0 TO; FROM; DATE; Mav'or and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 20, 1993 SUBJECT;City Hall and Public Works Buildings Application and Certificate of Payment No. 11 Attachment: Application and Certificate of Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. Steenberg-Watrud Northside Construction Goebel Fixture Vohnoutka Roofing Jansco Caulking LaForce Hardware Hoffer Glass Mulcahy Inc. Dale Tile Co. Swanson & Youngdale Inc. W. L. Hall Company Ackley-Dornbach Allied Mechanical Gephart Electric Payment No. 11 $ 7,609.76 13,693.32 37.807.00 31.199.00 17.809.00 2,155.50 20,007.90 14,970.60 13,211.10 6,721.20 5.400.00 8,763.30 4.680.00 34.204.00 40.680.00 We have received from project Construction Manager John Davies approved application for pa>anent of work at the city hall and public works locations as follov;s: Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. - For site supervision and reimbursable expenses through December 19, $7,609.76. Steenberg-Watrud Constr - For site work at the city hall/police buildings, $13,693.32. Northside Construction - For carpentry at police/city hall and public works buildings, $37,807.00. Goebel Fixture Co. - For Fixtures at the city hall/police buildings, $31,199.00. Vohnoutka Roofing - For roofing and sheet metal at city hall/police building, $17,809.00. Jansco Caulking - For caulking at city hall/police and public works buildings, $2,155.50. LaForce Hardware - For hardware, metal doors and frames at city hall/police, and public works buildings, $20,007.90. LI Hoffer's Inc. - For glass work at public works and city hall/police buildings, $14,970.60. Mulcahy Inc. - For drywall and exterior insulation and finish system work at the city hall/police and public works buildings, $13,211.10 Dale Tile Co. - For ceramic tile, quarry tile, and slate at the city hall/police and public works buildings, $6,721.20. Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. - For painting and wallcovering at the city hall/police and public works buildings, $5,400.00. W. L. Hall Co. - For folding partition at the council chambers, $8,763.30. Ackley-Dornbach, Inc. - For detention equipment, hardware and metal at the police building, $4,680.00. Allied Mechanical Systems - For plumbing, heating, venting and air conditioning oi. city hall/police and public works buildings, $34,204.00. Gephart Electric Company, Inc. - For electric work at public works and city hall/police buildings, $40,680.00. The attachments are presented for your approval. There is a 10% retainage remaining for each of these subcontractors on the payment application (please see the attached spreadsheet titled application number: 11). All of the requested payments are within the budget update amounts presented to the Council at the January 11 meeting. Requested Action: Council approval of Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 11 as presented. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to approve City Hall and Public Works Buildings Architect's Application and Certificate for Payment No. 11 in the amount of $258,911.68, as presented. Motion, Ayes _, nays _. APPUCAT10N AND CERTinCATE FOR PAYMENT Page 1 of 1 PagesTO (OW«R): City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PROJECT: Orono City Hall/Policeand Public Works Building OOf^TRUCHON MANAOER: Kraus Anderson Construction 525 South Eighth Street Minneapolis. MN 55404 ARCHITECT: Boarman Kroos Pfister 222 North Second Street Minneapolis. MN 55401 APPLICATION NO ElevenPERIOD FROM: December i, 1992 fvRIOD TO: December 31. 1992 ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 1124.04 CONTRACT DATE: November 12. 1991 SECTION CONTRACTOfVSUPPLIER CURRENT PAYMENT DUE 100 Kraus-Anderson $7,609 76 04220 Steenberg-Watrud $13,693.32 06100 Northside Construction $37,807.00 06200 Goebel Fixture $31,199.00 07610 Vohnoutka $17,809.00 07900 JanSCO $2,155.50 08110 LaForce Hardware $20,007.90 08410 Hriffer Glass $14,970.60 09260 Mulcahy, Inc.$13,211.10 09300 Dale Tile Co.$6,721.20 09900 Swanson & Youngdaie $5,400.00 10655 W L. Hall Company $8,763.30 11190 Ackley-Dornbach $4,680.00 15000 Allied Mechanical $34,204.00 16000 Gephart Electric $40,680.00 TOTAL;$258,911 68 ARCHITECTS CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above situation, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information ar>d belief the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractors are entitled to payment of the AMOUNT INDICATED. ARCHITECT; i By://^^Date: I// ORONO cnv HAU AND Pt»UC WORKS BUILDNGS ORONO.MN PAGE: 1 OF 6 APPLICATJON NUMBER; 11CONTRACTOR S PROJECT NO: 4059 ORONO CfTY HALL AND PUeUC WORKS BUILDf^ ORONO.MN PAGE: 2 OF 6 APPLICATION NUMBER; 11 CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT NO.: 4059 tIBI NO [ASCRIPTION OF WORK WORK COMPIFTED STOPS) MATERIALS TOTAL COAIPITTED STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO RN6H RETAJNAGESCHEDULED VALUE PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS THIS APPLICATION 2510 Midwest Asphalt $41,100 00 $38,277 00 $30.277 00 93%$2,823.00 $3,827.70 CO 1 514.396 00 $14,398 00 $14,398 00 100%$0 00 $1,439 80 2950 Midtond Nursary $35,804 00 $0 00 0%$35,884 00 $0 00 3300 OrMMr - PuMc Work*$81,578 00 101.570 00 $81,578.00 100%$0.00 $8,157 80 3410 MoHn Concrsis $14,106 00 $14,196 00 $14.196 00 100%$0.00 $1,419.60 CO 1 $6,867 00 $6,867 00 $6,867 00 100%$0.00 $686 70 4220 OrMMr-k >«cWork*$100,249 00 $100,249 00 $100,249 00 100%$0 00 $10,024.90 CO 1 $5,596 00 $5,506 00 $5,596 00 100%$0 00 $559 60 CO 2 $3,461 00 $3,461 00 $3,461 00 100%$t 00 $346.10 CO 3 $1,331 00 $1,331 00 $1,331 00 100%$0 00 $133.10 . 4220 SiMntero-Watrud • Clly H«l A PufaOc Works $342,500 00 $313,415 00 $29,085 00 $342,500 00 100%$0 00 $34 250 00 CO 1 ($13,070 75)($13,870 75)($13,870 75)100%$0 00 ($1,387 08) CO 2 $11,074 00 $0 00 0%$11,974 00 $0 00 S100 Mannstsdt Staal $40,460 00 $41,427 CC»$41,427 00 102%($967 00)$0 00 CO 1 $8,540 00 $8,540 00 $8,540 00 100%$0 00 $0 00 CO 2 $793 00 $793 00 $793 00 100%$0 00 $0 00 5110 Amaract. Inc $15,145 00 $15,145 00 $15,145 00 100%$0 00 $1,514 50 9103 Noflhakla Conslriicaon $279,000 00 $201,532 00 $42,308 00 $243,540 00 67%$36,440 00 $24 354 00 OnONO CfTY HALL AND PUBLiC WORKS BUILDWGS OnONO.MN PAGE: 3 OF 6 APPLICATION NUMBER: 11CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.; 4059PAGE: 2 OF 6 APPLICATION NUMBER: 11CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.: 4059TOTAL COMPIETH) STORED TO DATE % BALANCETO1 RN6H 1 RETA»iAGE$39,277 00 93%|$2,823.00 $3,827 70$14,398 00 00%l $0 00 1 $1,439 60$0 00 0%i $35,884 00 1 $0 001$81.578 00 100%!$0.00 1 $6,157 80 i $14,196 00 100%|$0 00 $1,419.60 $6 ,867 00 100%10 00 1 $686.70 $100,249 00 100%$0 00 $10,024 90 $!..S96 00 <00%$0 00 $559 60 $3,461 00 100%|$i 00 1 $346.10 $1,331 00 100%$0 00 1 $133 10 1 $342,500 00 100%j $0 00 $34,250 00 ($13 870 7511 100%$0 00 ($1,387 08) $0 00 0%1 $11,974 00 I $0 00 $41.42^ 00 102%!C$967 00)$0 00 1 $0 $40 00 100%!$0 00 $0 00 1 $?»3 00 100%1 $0 00 $0 00 1 $1$ 14$ 0€1 1005J $0 00 $1 $14 so $243 540 Of 87%1 $36,440 00 $24,354 OoJ rreyiNO DESCRIFTiONOFWORK •MDRK COMPLETED STOREDMATERIALS TOTAL COMPIETH) STORED TO DATE %BALANCETOFJNGH RETA»4AG£SCHEDULEDVALUE PREVIOUSAPPLICATIONS THIS/APPLICATION1200Qoebgl Rxtuf0 $43,621.00 $43,621 00 $43,621.00 100%$0.00 $4,362.10CO. 1 ($6,956.00)($6,956.00)($6,956 00)100%$0 00 ($895 60)7120 Krenwr and Davis $2,925 00 $2,925 00 $2,925 00 100%$0 00 $292 50C O. 1 • Add City OffIcM $400.00 $400 00 $400 00 100%$0 00 $40 0017200$rrow ifxkjstrlaa $0,840.00 $6,840 00 $8,640 00 100%$0 00 $864 00CO. 1 $6,400 00 $6,400 00 $6,400 00 100%$0 00 $640 00 7240 Mi4tahy $47,500 00 $37,500 00 $37,500.00 79%$10,000 00 $3,750 00 7610 Vohnojtfca Roofing $156,208.00 $119,546.00 $19,766 00 $139,33P 00 69%$16,952 00 $13,933 60 CO. 1 ($6,975 00)$0 00 0%($6,975.00)$0 00 CO 2 $2,733 00 $0 00 0%$2,733 00 $0 00 7000 Janaoo Cau Vtng $3,950 00 $3,650 OC $95 00 $3,745 00 95%$205 00 $374 50 CO 1 $7o:>o $70 00 $70 00 100%$0 00 $7 00 CO 2 $4,520 00 $2,220 00 $2,300 00 $4,520 00 100%$0 00 $452 00 8110 LaFofca Hardvai^a $35,465 00 $15,654 00 $19,811 00 $35,465 00 100%$0 00 $3,546 SO CO 1 $6,054 00 $1,464 00 $1,464 00 24%$4,590 00 $146 40 CO 2 $536 00 1536 00 $536 00 100%$0 00 $53 60 CO 3 $2,070 00 $420 00 $420 00 20\$1,650 00 $42 00 6360 Twin CHy Qaraga Door $21,945 00 $21,945 00 $21,945 00 100%$0 00 $2,194 50 OROWOCfTVORONO.MNoftONO ertv hall and public works buildmgsORONO.MN PAGE: 4 OF 6 APPUCATKDN NUMBER: 11CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.: 4059mayiNODESCRIPnONOfWORKWORK COMPLETED STOREDMATERALS TOTALCOMPLETH)STOf^DTODATE %BALANCE TO PNtSH RCTAriAGESChCDUlH)VALUE PfCVKXJSAPPLICATIONS THISAPPLICATIONCO. 1 $1,403 00 $1,403 00 $1,407 00 100%$0 00 $140.306410Hoffer^ Glass $78,745 00 $58,474.00 $16,634 00 $75,108.00 95%$3,637.00 $7,510.80CO 1 ($3,463 00)($3,463 00)($3,463 00)100%$0.00 ($346.30)S260 Muicahy $117,500 00 $10,400 00 $13,500 00 123.900.0020%$93,600.00 $2,360.00CO. 1 $10,261.00 $5,130 00 $5,130 00 50%$5,131.00 $513.00CO 2 $2,356 00 $1,160.00 $1,176.00 $2,356 00 100%$0.00 $235.60\:9300 OalsTnaCo $21,262 or.$14,660.00 $6,302 00 $21,262 00 100%$0.00 $2,126.20 CO. 1 $1,726 00 $560 00 $1,166 00 $1,726 00 100%$0.00 $172.60 9500l¥i4n CHy Acous6cs $16,310 00 $0 00 0%$16,310.00 $0 00 9660 SI Paul LInoiaum $36,553 00 $0.00 0%$36,553.00 $0.00 9600 Tachnicat Surfacing $e 850 00 $6,650 00 $6,650 00 100%$0.00 $885 OD 9900SsNir>aon and Youngdata $24,894 00 $17,000 00 $6,000 00 $23,000 00 92%$1,894.00 $2,300 00 10160T. S Howard / K A $6,146 00 $4,368 12 $4,366 12 71%$1,757 88 $436 81 10200CrysUd MIg / K-A $6,462 00 $0 00 0%$6,462 00 $0 00 10400laRoy Sign $2,536 UO $0 00 0%$2,538 00 so 00 rrB4NO10500Moc10522Nar10605Bar10655Wl11190Adi13120Mai13120MaCC 13120 J A 15000ABii CC CC 15500Nai CC 16000Ga CC OAONO crrv hau . md pueuc works euiLOiNasOnONO.MN PAGE: 5 OF 6 APPLICATTON NUMBER: 11CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.; 4053XiiO 300 90^6 30)>0 0013 00IS 90 i9 20 r2 60 M)00 (0 00 IS 03 30 00 »• 91 MOO low nrB4NO.DESCRiPnCN OF WORK WOfK COMPLEltD STORB)MATERIALS TOTAL COMPUbrED STORED TO DATE 1 RETAINACt8CHEDULH)VALUE PREVIOUSAPPUCATIONS T>ilSAPPLICATION %BALANCETORN6H105004od0fti BJo $7,841 00 $0.00 0%$7.84100 $0.0010S22Nardinl / K A $724 00 $723 64 $723 64 100%$0 3 $72 3610605BariNy Sates / K A $2,123 00 $0 00 c%$2,123 00 $0 00106S5WL Hal $12,656 00 $2,919 00 $9,737 00 $12,656 00 100%$0 00 $1,265 6011190Ackley-Dombach $31,000 00 $5,200 00 $5,200 00 17%$25,600 00 $520.0013120Mel-Con Construction - Matedaie $156,200 00 $156,200.00 $156,200.00100%$0 00 $0 0013120Met-Con Construe6on $54,500 00 $54,500 00 $54,500.00100%$0.00 $5,450 00 CO. 1 $3,276 00 $3,278.00 $3,278 00 100%$0 00 $327 80 13120J 9 F Construc6on $36,400 00 $0 00 0%$36,409 00 $0 00 15000 Anted Mtehanlcal $390,000 00 $347,104 00 $38,680 00 $3 784.00 99%$4,216.00 $38.578 40 CO 1 ($8,066 71)($8,086 71)($8,086.71)100%$0 00 ($808.67) CO 2 ($1,672 00)($1,672 00)($1,672.00)100%$0 00 ($167.20) 1SS00 NaSonai Automatic Sprinkler $46,590 00 $44,940 00 $44,640 00 96%$1,650 00 $4,494 OC CO 1 $6,580 00 $6,580 00 $6,560 00 100%$0.00 $656 00 16000QepKart Electric $279,400 00 $219,870 00 $45,200 00 $265,070 00 95%$14 1,30 00 $26,507 00 C O i1 ($0,267 00)($9,267.00)($9,267.00)100%1^0 00 ($928.70) ORONO CITY MALI A^« PUBLIC V^TORKS BUILDNGS ORONO.MN PAGE: 6 OF 6 APPLICATION NUMBER; 11CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.. 405®ITB4NO DESCRiPnONOPWORK SCHEDULEDVALUE WORK COMPLETED STOREDMATERIALS TOTALrOMRLETH)STO-HnrODATF.%BALANCE TO PNtSH RETAMAGEPRB^tOUSAPPLiCATIONS THISAPPUCATiONKraut-ArKtorscm Umbrella liability Ins.$1,500 00 $0.00 0%$1,500 00 $0 00KrwaAnitofvon CM Fm $89,430 00 $89,430 00 $89,430 00 $0 00 $0 00SUBTOTAL OR TOTAL $3,254,039 54 $2,547,786 91 $205,837 01 $0.00 $T.828.612 16 873t $425,427.38 $234,110.70 I KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (0\ , IVAClOKS CONSTRUCriON .\tA\AC.ERS___________________ January 6, 1993 Invoice #P28778 City of Orono P.O. Box 66, 1335 Brown Road S. Crystal Bay, MN 55423 Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn Finance Director Re: Orono City Hall K/A Project #4059 ppmieist For Payment This request for payment is for reimbursable expenses through December 19, 1992, as per construction manager contract dated November 12, 1991. P^imbursable E,XD«;nSgS T. S. Howard Co. K/A Equipment Rental Nardini Fire Veit Container Corp. $4,388.12 1,638.00 723.64 860.00 Amount Due This Invoice $7.609.76 Minmapotis Divisiai 525 South $th Sif*«t. MN 55404 PhcMi* 1612) J32 7281 FAX: t»12) 3J2 8739 (qiMi 0|>portunily Cmotoyer • ! APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT m document cjozTO (OWNER): City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PROIECT: Orono City llall/Pollce and Public Works Bldgs.(Inslrucliops on fcvcf«e side) n^c£ ON| Of mcts APPLICATION NO: Six FROM (CONTRACTOR): Steenb'irg-Watrud Constr. VIA (ARCHITECT): 10255 Inver Grove Trail Inver Grove Ilts., MN 55076 CONTRAa FOR: CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT V. Cc: CHANCE ORDER SUMMA^ Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL Date Approved Mtt\TKr.) Conipoov totals Net change by Change Orders ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Conltaclor-s knowledge. utu.5^ H ‘O'”, Work for which previous Ceriilicales (or Payment were he«in fs iow d!ir payment shown CONTRACTOR^ttee/fberg-l t^d^nstructlon, Inc, /i Hale: __ H"‘30"92 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT Ir»M '^'L^ **15 Contract Documents, based rm on site observations and the k !.1 Architect certifies to the Owner that to the : J ° ' J*.V5 ‘^**^**5* ‘ 'n'ormation and belief the Work has progressed as ^iMted, the quality of ihe Work u in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CLRTIMED. M oocomint cm • APpnranoN ano riinirK ah OisfribuHon to: □ OWNERPERIOD TO: U-30-,/2 □ ARCHITECT , „ □ CONTRACTOR ARCHITECrS □ PROJECT NO: 1124.OA ’ □ CONTRACT DATE: 1. ORICINAI CONTRACT SUM........................................... 2. change by Change Orders..................................^ (13,870 75 ) 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 i 2)................... S 328,629.25 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE............. 1328,629.25 (Column C on C703) .......... 5. RETAINAGE: a. __LQ % of Completed Work $ 32.862.93 (Column D + E on C701) -----% of Stored Material $ ~0-_______ (Column F on G703) lolal Retainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of C703)..................................... 32,862.93 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE........................j 295,766.32 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) ' ~ 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 (torn prior Certificate)..............S 282 ,073.00 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE....................................... ‘ j 13,693.32------- Q RAt AlUI'C Tr% ClKilcaa n. • iai . ............... ...................................... ^ ^ ^ ^ ^9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PiUS RETAINAGE !!!!!!!..!!!!$ 37^862! 93 (Liryt^ jess Line Q) Subscribed Snd^Wer6 to |*c Notary Public: My Commission expires: »clore/fn/thi: [nnmufWMw J. WATRUD C~|yONNiSfcrA i AMOUNT CERTIFIED POBUC----- y - DAKOTA COUNTY ^ My Commission Gxpims Fob. to. 1004 S By:’ ] ------------------------------------—-— ---------— Date: _____________ Ihis Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is Payable only lo th» Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance oi parent are wllhoul prejudice lo any rights of tlie (Twner or Contractor under this Co^niracl. J On ANU CLKl Hii^Al 1: I UK ivvnviiiivi aia uu^unimi o/t/.liiisiiucitons on rcvcr&c aact ia JTO (OWNER):PROjECT:APPMCATION NO: S Distribution lo:City of Orono Orono City llall/Police iind PERIOD TO:n OWNER1335 Drown Road Soutli Public Works Duildings □ ARCHITECTCrystal Day, MN 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR):VIA (ARCIINfCT):ARCHITECT'S □ CONTRACTOR□/y'Df^H^iOtr 0€A/$7XUC7to^y Doarman Kroos Pfister and Assoc.PRO)ECT NO: 1124.04 □ CONTRACT FOR: 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Applicaiion 1$ made for Paymeni, as shown below. In connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Oocumeni C703, is attached. CHANGE ORDER SUMM.\R''• Change Orders approved previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS .DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month Number Dale Approved r • Vi.iiAlS Net change by Change ' •.d.us 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.......................................$ 2. Net change by Change Oidcrs...................................$_____________ 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 i2).......................S ^7? 4. TOTAL COMRLETEO & STORED TO DATE...................S (Column C on C703) 5. RETAINACE; , , a. ,J!£. % ol Completed Work S -Sr* /o (Column D T E on C703) b. _% o( Stored Material t_________________ ( t g>o Tlie undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best o( the Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by lliis Applicaiion for Payment has been completed In accordance willi the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Ceilificales lor Paymeni wore issued attd payments received from the Owner, if herein Is now due. and that cuiruni paymeni shown CONTRACTOR: ,> ■ / /P OOWHAJMIRIAUIT notary PUBUC-MINNE80DL WASHINGTON COUNTY My Comm. Eapiraa 3-6-B7 ‘ ‘ ------------rcrffij (Column F on C703) Toial Retalnagc (line 5a + 5h or Total It) Column I of C703)................................ 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE............................ (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERIlflCATES FOR PAYMENT (line 6 from prior Certificate)................% Idl 37^,^ 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE......................................... t .? 7. Xo'7. C'O 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE.......................< La 7 ?</ (line 3 less Line 6) D.Ue:- 2 a - ^ Stale of: y\ Vt£.Soh3- Subscribed and ssvorn to before me this Notary Public: Q- 'i fr»<n/ rf4- My Commission cxf)ircs: 2^" PS - County of: u3/>-fik’)3Ta,*foll. day of C)e£« .19^5 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on site ol >etvalions and the data comprising the above application, the Atcbiicci cctiilics to ibe Owner that lo ihc best ol the ArchItcci's knowledge, Information and belief the Work has pi. v^rcsscd .is indicated, the quality of the Work Is In accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor Is entitled to payment ol Ihc AMOUNT CERlIflED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED $ (AU»ch c*p/anaf/on if amount ceitificd diffeis (torn the amount appfied for.} ARCHITECT: Doarinan Kroos Pfister and Associates Oy:Dale: This Ccrtllicale is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED Is payable only lo the Contractor named herein. Issuance, paymeni and acceptance of paymeni arc without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA OOCUMINT C701 •AmiCAIION AND CIRliriCAlE rOR rAYMI NT • ».vAV mi IOmON*AIA* •€» mi ini AARIUCAN INSIIIUII Of AXatmCIS. 17iS HIW YORK AVDJUI, N.W., WASHIHCION. D.C. JOOOt G70M903 *«f« MtM**«* vtrYfntoR f| Cnrvvflriht ltW9 lod fl fub|fCl lo pnjlfCUttoil. a.isuvjtuo.u on fcvci^c ------------- — 7[7r 5 DisltlbuUon lo;APPUCMION NO; •=> ^ oWNtR□ ARCHlTtCT□ CONTRACTORa .O. n OWNtRp[RlOD TO:ARCHlTtCT’S ^3C. rROltCTNO:CONTRACT DATE; --------- -- ----------------Ootum^ni CTO’. ^^ ..........................’.‘V.’.’*.’* J,c ............................... JDAU (Unc ................................8, STORED TO DATE...................;70i).eawo,.on G70T) ___Matctlal ^ ------------------------ ” n » ol .............................................j ss ................................... wincMtsroil ;// >. i i,om p.io. c...ir.c..e)........- ’ NT DUE................................. ^ ftf' ?M' [tsH. f'lUS ..........................**“____________ County of; r\ f 14-^^*-''— t; day .19^ a ‘illiT Associates ;an Krooii PExstet __ Dale# •■ "“* I I ii>ft ih. Mioum cww --------------- —— QCl't8®2 X APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA document G7v>^ Unsnuclions on reverse side) PACtONiof l»AC£S*TO (OWNER): KRAUS ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. I’ROItCT: qro NO MUNICIPAL FACILITY525 South 8th St. • ORONO.MNMPLS, MN 55A0A Attn: John DaviesFROM (CONTRACTOR): GOEBEL FIXTURE CO. VIA (ARCHITECT):528 Dale &;;reet SW Hutchinson, MN 55350 CONTRACT FOR: 818 Architectural Woodwork APPLICATION NO; IPtRIOD TO:ARCHITECT’S PROIECT NO:CONTRACT DATE:Distribution to;□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENTCHANCE ORDER SUMMARYChange Orders approved in previous months by OwnerTOTAL ADDITIONSApproved this Month pproved0 mz DEDUCTIONS Application is made (or Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document C703, is attached.1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM......................................1 -------—2. Net change by Change Orders ...................................S3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1*2).......................$ ------------4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE...................$ 3^»665,QQ--------------(Column G on G70J)5. RETAINAGE:a, 10 % ol Completed Work '> 3,4^6 ,flQ-----------(Column D + E on C701)b. _"Xi o( Stored Mater al S--------------------------— li,;.... .'URJcrWHl TOTALS (Column F cn G70T) total Rctainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I ol G70J)...................................S 3,466.00 C CNel«?hai\{fftU(vtghV(Wy3rdcrs The undersigned Contiactor cenUlcs that to the best o( the Contractor ’s knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Conn act Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment wore Issued and payments '■eccived (rom the Owner, and that current pt<yment shown herein is now due. (•. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE...............................S _llt ^99.00 (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERUWCAIIS FOR PAYMENT (LirifHnrSp' Certi(tcale)..............S-------------2. B. CURRENT PAWHI nT ....................................S 31,199,.Q0 IffTitSpi IT PUkV . CONTRACTOFU/COEBEL FIXTURE CO , / ') By:^/l/xq-yc, ■VI i'kII 0u4ibcl, CEO - fe Ciuntyol; MEEKER ..r»^iStit»sc^H*(|t^dUi%»tno belor^^ 8th day olDecember J9 92 Date- December 8. 1992 ^(C^'C^t»mjyHiion expires; ' --------------------- ^...........................---------------------------------------------------------------------- I ...............— Jf^MjljNT CERIIFIED.................................................8 ARCFliTECTS CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT Mn.ich cxp/anafron .wnounf cc.rr/rc'i d /zers In accordance with the Contract Documenis, based on on-site observations aird tire ARCHITECT; data comprising the above application, the Architect ccrlilics to the Owner that lo the best of the Architect ’s knowled'jC, information and belief the Work has progressed as gy;----------- ut i„ ,« th» Indicated the quality of the V ork is in accordairce with the Contract Documenis. and Certilicale is not negotiable. I he AMOUNT CFRTIFIED is payable only W Iw the Contractor is entitled to oaymenl ol the AMOUNT aRIll HD. Contractor named herein. Issuance . payment and acceptance olpaymenlarewithQUl Date: prejudice to any rights ol the Owrer or Contractor under this Contract AIA DOCUMINI G7« • AmiCAIION AND URUfiCAU lOR fA>MINI • MAV i ill imiKm • *'»• THI AMimcAN iNsmmi or xtriiu' <• ............ CHANGE ORDER SUMMARYChange Oftlcrs approved in ADDiTIONS DLDUCTIONSprevious morilhs hy OwnerTOTAL 10,752.00 15,820.00/<pproved (his MonthNumberDnle Approved TOTALS 10,752.00 15,820.00 Net change by Change Orders (5,068.00) CHANCE ORDER SUMMARYChange Orders approved in previous months by OwnerTOTAL ADDiTIONS 1iK DEDUCTIONSApproved this MonthNumberDate Approved •po, o a Oci/ TOTALS CO Net change by Change Orders ^b90 40 0 Application and Certificate for Payment (substitute for AIA Document G702) Application No.: Application Date: Period To; La Force Job No.: 04 12/18/92 12/25/92 1A151 Project Name: CITT HALL/PUBLIC WORKS FAC TO: KRAUS ANDERSON 525 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, KN 55404 FROM: LA FORCE HARDWARE 6 MFG. CO. P.O. BOX 10068 GREEN BAY, WI 54307-0068 TRADE PAYMENT BREAKDC’JN IS ATTACHED. ^ $ 35,465.001. Original Contract Sum .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*. . . . ^ '7.010.00 2. Net Change by Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . u^\->5.Q0 3. Contract Sum to Date (line 1 + 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37*885 00 4. Total Completed & Stored to Date (column G) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ? j/,ooj.w 5. Retainage: , -x e tar sna. lO.OOZ of completed work (column D + r.) . . . . 5 3,/oo.ou b. 10.002 of Material Stored (column F) . . . . . . f , 700 so Total Retainage (line 5a + 5b; or total colu^ I) . . . . . . . . . . . | 3,/bbj^ 6. Total Earned Less Retainage (line 4-5 totals) . . . . . . . . . . . . 14*088 60 7. Less Previous Certificates for Payment ......................................................... + ' (line 6 from prior certificates) ^ 20.007.90 8. Current Payment Due .................. g 8 ’37s!50 9. Balance to Finish, Plus Retainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ’ (line 3 less line 6) The undersiened Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knwledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been pai y the"Jont?actor for Work for which previous Certificates for payments received from the Owner, and that currer^j^yment sho^^ herein is now d . CONTRACTOR. LA FORCE HARDWARE R MFC. CO. . 12/18/92 State of: Wisconsin County of: Brown . QJ 19 UV ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ^orrs *nd the data In accordance with the Contract Documents, Base on Owner that to the best comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Wor ** the indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docum . . Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED $ ARCHITECT:By:Date: This Certificate is not negotiable. The A.M0UNT CERTIFIED P*J*^g* without . iAPPLICATION ANO CERTIFICATE FOR PAY.VIENT AIA document C702 dnstruciions on reverse side) rACi ONI of^n%cisTO (OWNER):City of Orono1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR): PROIECT:Orono City llall/Police and Public Works Buildings AmiCATlON NO: 3 . PERIOD TO: 12/31/92 CONTRAa FOR: VIA (ARCHITECT): ARCHITECT'S Doarman Kroos Pfister and Assoc. PROlECr NO: 1124.04 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 554 01 CONTRACT DATE: Distribution to:□ OWNER □ ARCHITECT □ CONTRACTOR□□ CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CHANCt OKDtR SUMMARY Change Orders approved In i'reviuus months hy Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS ^proved Ihls Month 1*' one . , DaJe Approved bci. • 11/2/92 by Giange (prders TOTALS DEDUCTIONS (-3,/t63.00) Application is made lor Payment, as shown below. In connection with the Coniraci. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM......................................$ 2. Net change by Change Orders...................................$ 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2).......................| A. TOTAL COMPLETED & STOKED TO DATE...................S _ (Column C on C703) 5. RETAINAGE: a. % ol Completed Work \ 7 ^ 16A , jQ (Column D i E on G703) b. _% ol Stored Matcri.tl $________________ (Column F on C703) Total Rctainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total In Column I ol G703) ... .........- . w . S 7,16A.50 The undersigned Conlrai^ior ci|rtinus that to the best ol the (^Contractor's knowledge, inlorntalion and beliel Ihc Work covered Ly litis Application (or Payment has been completed in accordance with Ihc CuntracI Oocumems, ih^t all amounts have been paid by Ihc Contractor (or Work (or which previous Cerlilicaics lor Payment were issued and payments 'ccelved from the Owner, and I’lal current payment shown herein Is nuw due. 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ... (Line A less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIHCAIES TOR ^A-A8075TT 49,509.90 1/PAYMENT (Lir»e 6 Irorn prior Ccriilicalc)..............$ 6. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE............................................$ ,9/U. bU 9. BALANCE TO fINISH, PIUS RETAINAGE.....................$ 10,801,50 (Line 3 less Line (>) CONTRACTOR: Iloffer's Inc, ny. Gcorp.e Hints Date:12/18/92 Stale Subscribed and Notary Public My Commission expires ARCHITECT'S CERTirTCATE FOR PAYMENT Coiw\Y.Ql I henmepw county j AMOUNT CERTIFIED u., r.nfflmiuion EiPkM Feb O. tW* > !333vvvw S5 v ^^ In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on siitr observations and the data comprising lire above application, lire Arihilect cerlilies to the Owner llial to Ihc iivst oi tile Archnecl's knowledge, information ami belief lire Work lias progressed as indicated, lire quality o( the Work is in accnrdanr e wills the CoiilracI Documents, and die Cuniractur is entitled to payment ul llic AMOUNT CIKliriED. (Aliach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount applied for.) ARCHITECT: Boarman Kroos Pfister and Associates By:_ Dal;: Tills Ccriilicale Is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment arc without prciudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor u.ider tliis Contract. AMIMKUMINt Cm*AmiCAIlON ANIlCtNIIIICAIt lOR mYMINI • MAY l<MI initlON • AIA* • « IWl f»t« * " . siruclions on reverse side) taci OnirnCATIONNO: 3 .RIODTO: 12/31/92RCIIIUCTSR01F.CT NO: 1124.04 ONTRACT DATE:Disiribuliou to:□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□, as shown below, in conncclion with >he Contract, cnl C703, is auaciretl., 78.745.00............................\ (-3,463.UU)“1>10D»1C.................... /i,,b-.a.mr^ 13) • . • m** « • * w. • .1. ... S ACE ...............................$ ES fOR iiior Cciti(icale)..............S 7,164.50 64,480.50 49,509.90 »/ l«i ,9/U . 6U RCTAINACE...................$ 10.801,50 Couoiy.ol i ►re me ilii% . yVrf!iub notary pubuc - certintd diffets front the unount applivU lot.) roos Pfister and Associates Tate: aWe The *MOlR4T CERTiflED is payable only to lint Mnce, paymeni and acceptance of payment are without f Owner ot Cuniracirr under litis Contract. iuiM A(NU LtKHi lCATE rOR PAYMFNT aia nr.c , r n. ..rOtnWNIRi. n~-------------------------- ----------- UUMH/Vr (,702 (InOrmtlims mi reverse ship) ni;» onmurt.„ rA PROItCt: ^ Pubpe Works ArmcAIION NO: 4Orono, Minn.riRIOI) TO: 12/31/92City of Orono 1335 Brown Rd. S.Crystal Bay, Minn. 55323IROM tCONIRAClOR): w i . , w.aMtileahy, Inc. , via (ARuimci);525 S. 8th St. THOltCT NO:CONtRACT roR: Bid Divisons #14 & 20 Drvwall A RTF.c; Minneapolis, Minn.-----------------------------------------—-----------------------------------1 __________________ ___ CONTRACT DAtE:ARC! intersTHOItCT NO:DUltilnilinn In:□ OWNtR□ ARCIIIltCT□ CONIRACIORr.iuCONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION POR PAYMENTCHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ’ -----------------1Change Orders approved In previous months hy OwnerTOIAL ADUIIIONS DtDUCIIONSApprnvcd tills Month •Number Dale A|)iirovcclTOIAI.S Ncl Change by Change Onlcfs Appllcallon Is ni.vie for a* slmwn below. In connecllon wllli Die ConirjriConllnuallon Sheet, AIA Uncunienl C703, Is allAtlicd " ""1. ORtr.lNAl CONIRACf SUM.......................................... 165,000.002. Net change by Change Ordeil ................!.!!..!.,!!« 12,620.003. CONIRACf SUM TO DATE (I hie t ± 2)................] ” 5 T7 7.h?n ,nn4. TOIAl COMPintt) & SIORII) TO OAfE................] . % TQ f)n.-(O.lomn r. on C7(M) uoe, cq5. REIAINAC.E:*-------% of Cnmpleied Wmk $(Cniomn I) 4 I on ti7(M) b. _— % of Slorrrt At.ileriat % licicin Is now due. CONIRACIOR:Mulcahy, Inc. Dale: 12-16-92 (Column r on C7IMI Total Rel.iln.ip,c (I Inc 5a I 5l» or Total In Column I of G7H1I...................................... IrT-HS-HK-OO 6. lOIAl EARNED lESS REIAINACE............................... t 1S7.hn« ,nn It Inc 4 less line 5 Total) ------- 7. lESS PREVIOUS CERTITICATES TOR .. curNTr«M.rJr ...* 1. lAiANcc 10 tiNisii, rtus niiAiNAcc...........! ' " t nn"'^ ---------lillLe.JtcsslInef,)^______________________;• State of: Minnesota County of: WAshl neton Sohscrlhcd and sworn to before me this 16th d.sy ofDec. 19 92 Nntsiry rubllc: • My Conifiilssion expircsi AMOUNT rtRliniU....................................... ' .... " ■■ f WanWHa: Unn«nMd pholo.op»ln, II9 top,.t,W I.W.C702 1511 r.¥LlL re-!! fsm turiB*] APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA document C702 (InslmcUons on reverie side)PACE ONE OF PACESfh-ici-Anderson Construction Hall & Public WorksG'r--------- --------- -----------*■TO (0WNE^25 South 8th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55404 farage - Orono, Minnesota APPLICATION NO:Two^wa^^on*^L*^o^ngdale, Inc.P.O. Box 26070, Mpla., MN 55426 VIA (ARCHITECT):Boatman, Kroos,Pfister & Associates Distribution to:□ OWNERPERIOD TO: ^2/31/92 □ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTORARCHITECT'S □PROIECT NO: ^0^9 □CONTRACT FOI^^^^ Wa11 rnvnring CONTRACT DATE: 05/11/92CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached.CHANGE ORDER SUMMARYChange Orders approved in previous months by OwnerTOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONSAPI^rgygd ^i|Number " '’Dal^'Apjirovedrjl,;. 1 » Nel change by Change Orde. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.........................................$2. Nel change by Change Orders ......................................$tJ94.000.003. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ±2)........................$------24,894 .._0^4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE.....................$ —23,00.0^0^(Column C on C703)5. RETAINAGE:t»9___% of Completed Work $ ,2,300_. 00---------(Column D + E on C703) \jP___% of Stored Material $0.00(Column F on G703) Total Retalnage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of G703)2.300.00 I he undcrsigneo L.onif3Cior ccfinics inai lo ine uusi oi ine v-umidtjui » miuwiuu ^v., information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR:Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE............................$ —20.7QQ.t.Qj3L (line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)...............$........1 5 « 30Q.* QQ 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE...............................................S--------5 ■ 4QQ.QQ 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE.......................$ 4.194.00 (Line 3 less Line 6) By:Dale:12/15/92 uxot: Hennepin __ -------------- ^ S. E. EDI^S : Notary Publicft4./J f notary PUBUC • MINNESOTA County of: Subscribed and sworn to before me ihisV ARCHITECf'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT My Commission expires: /(j /5 • 94, HENNEPIN COUNTY { ‘ H|| uiiyilliaion (XL ti IW f In accordance with Ihe Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the dala comprising the above apjrlication, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accord.mre with the Contract Documen s, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of ttie AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED................................ (Attach explanation if amount ceftified dUfeis from the amount applied for.) ARCHITECT: By:Dale: This Certificate is not negotiable. TT»e AMOUNT CERIlflEO is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuanc*- payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the O viier or Contractor under this Contract. ATA OOCUMINl C7«» APPIICMION AND CtKIIIICAIl tOR IWMlNt • A»AY IS8I IDITION • ALA* • © 1981 Tin AAttltCAN INSllIUTt Or AROIItM IS, 171S NIW YORK AVINUl, N.W. WASIIINCION. DC. JUMt C.702-1983 FRCVi ••OflSlfl Tfie info Com paid iissui Tierc cot AR In nc data bcsl indtc the i AIA n tiff / Chai«(>e Orders approved in previous montlis by Owner’ ' TOTALApproved ibis Monlli,’ ApprovedCV20 19 • .1 11V Js-Aiulerson i TOTALS > i APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ma oocuMwruiK .cvc.scsw.r’2~«10 (OWNtR); City of Orouo1335 Brown Road SouthCrystal Bay, MN 55323 PROIECTClty Hall and Public Works Garage AmiCATION NO: Five (5) Dlsiribulion lo: Orono, UN □ OWNER. rruioo TO: 31. 1992 □architect•1 I • □ CONTRACTORrROM (CONTRACTOR): W. L. Hall Co. VIA (ARCIII'ECT): AROIITECT'S “IA800 Martin Drive Boarman, Kroos, Pflster and Associates pROjTCT NO;H2^*0A [jEden Prairie, MN 553A4 222 N. Second Street, Mpls., MN 55A01CONTRACT FOR: pivlalon //31. Section 10635 "Folding Partitions"___________________CONI RACE DATE: August 31, 1992_______CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMtNTCHANGE ORDER SUMMARYChange Orders approved in previous montlis by OwnerTOTAL ADDIIIONS290.00 DEDUCTIONSApproved Ibis Monlb Nun)bcr Dale Apptovcrl TOIALS Net clrange by Cliange Orders Applirnlion is made (nr rnymotU. ftS sirown below, in conncrlion with lire Contract. Continiialton Slicet, AIA Uociinient C703, is attaclrcd.1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM..............................j ! 12,656^002. Net change liy Cliange Orders......................................S J______^?0»003. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (t ine 1 ± 2)............A. TOTAL COMPLETED ^ SIORID TO DATE.............j 12,946.0 0(Column G or^ G701) 5. RE!/ INACF. a. —— % o( Coin|)lclc(l Work (Col'imn 1) I t on C70.1) I). % of Slorr?(l Malrrial ICuliiinn F on C'JIU) Tolol RclainaRe (line* Sn F 51) or Total in Column I of C70T) i 1,294,60 i 0,00 1,294,60 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE............................$ ' llf^MlA9 Tlie undersigned Coniraclor certifies llial l«) IIm! best of lire Cnnlfatlor's knowledge, information and bcIioT llic Work covered by ibis Applir .tlion (or (*,-iymeiil lias bee r complolcd in accordance with lire Conlract Uocimrenis, tital all ammmls liave Ireen paid by the Coniraclor (or Work frrr wliicli previous Cetlilir ales (or P.iymeol were issued and p.iynrenls received from tire Owner, and dial turteni paymcnl shown Itcrcin is now due. (Line 1 (ess Line S lolai) 7. LESS PR'^Vi JUS CERTITICATES FOR PAYMENT (line 0 from prior Ccrlilkate) n. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE............. 9. BALANCE lO TINISII, PIUS REIAINAGE (Line .1 less Line 0) . • ' 3,198.60 ^ • •• 8,452.80 GE*..t" ' 1.294.60 CONIRACTOR; W. L. Hall Co. Ry:D.iio; Deccml)er 17. 1992 Slate of: Minnesota Subscritjcd .ind sworn lo bdorp me tin Notary Pid.lic [gJ^PJ^ASYLYK »t ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT „ In accordance will) (he Conlract Docunrenl^, bsi^ii'd on ofiAili* oliservaiions sinci the data comprising the above application, tl)c Archilrc I rrrtilir^i to ilu* Ov npr \Um lo ibe best of Ibc Architeers knowledge, information arid helirf llu* Work ba^ pn |;ressed a«i Indicated, the quality of Ibe Work is in accordam r wiih (br ( onirar t Out uments, and the Contractor is entitled lo payment of the AN\C>UNI ( I RIlflll). ' Mh OOCUMINI C7«1 • Af*n ICAOON AND C IROIK AM I UK IMKMNI • K) W ‘OmON • AIA* • t | ifll im AAUHUrSN INSI'fOn of AJU UmCtS I7IS NIW VUliK AON) . N W \‘ l« MiinM Or nntn. My C n »^sion ex|)irr*s. April 9, AMOUNT aRUriED (AUac/i CYp/anafrun if nmnunt cerfrhed differs from (he ^nunmt app/ied for.) ARCHIUCi:i»*‘ ...» . s By:Date: Ibis Cerlificale is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CFRTiriED is psiyable only to thd Cfinlrac lor named herein. Issuanc e, paymeni arid acceptance of payment are without prejudice lo any righls of the Owner or Contraclur under this Conlract. . ■ *^ « •» .1* » m m ^ APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA document C702 (instructions on reverse side) TACEONtor 2 PACESTO (OWNER): Kraus-Anderson Construction525 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55A04 PROIECT: city Hall & Public Works Garage APPLICATION NO: 1Orono, MN PERIOD TO: 1-1-93FROM (CONTRACTOR): Ackley-Dornbach, Inc.716 N. 109th Street Wauwatosa, WI 53226 CONTRACT FOR: Detention Equipment VIA (ARCHITECT): Uoarraan, Kroos, Pflster ARCHITECT'S& Associates PRO)ECT NO:Distribution to: •□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT□ CONTRACTOR□□CONTRACT DATE: August 31, 1992CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Shcci, AIA Document C703, is attached.CHANCE ORDER SUM.MARYChange Orders approved in previous months by OwnerTOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONSApproved this Month .* • Number Date Approved • 1 ........................ 1 TOTALS Net change by Change Orders 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.......................................$___31,000.00.2. Net change by Change Orders ...................................$ 0.003. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 3:2).......................$____31,OOQ.._Q04. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE...................$____200,90.(Column C on G703)5. RETAINAGE:a. JjQ_ % of Completed Work $______52Q.._r^—(Column D + E on G703) b. _% of Stored Material $ , .................... 520.00 4.680.00 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of tire Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Work coveted by this Application for Payment has been completed In accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued arid payments received from the Owner, and that cu'rent paymtnt shown herein Is now due. (Column F on C703) Total Retainage (Line Sa + 5b or Total in Column I of G703).................................. $___ 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE...............................$____ (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)..............$ — 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE............................................$ — 9. BAUNCETO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE.....................$ 26.32Q.0Q (Line 3 less line 6) ______ Q.QQ 4.681M10 CONTRACTOR:Ackley-Dornbach, Inc. State of: Wisconsin County of: Milwaukee Subscribed and sworn to before me this , t 22/td' day of December ,1992 12-22-92 Subscribed and sworn to be fore me this ^ t Notary Public:^ /icAf My Commisr'on expires: /• lo permanent ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above application, the Arcliitect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief tlie Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED........................................................S (At.^ch explanation if amount certified diffets from the amount applied for.f ARCHITECT: By.Date: This Certificate Is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED Is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any fights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCIIMINT C70J • A}ir< rfPT'U^-'f ...................« , % APPTO (OWNER): City of Ore 1335 Brown Crystal Ba; FROM (CONTRACAllied Mechai 340 Michigan CONTRACT FOR.CONTRAtchance OROtCl^anRC Orders previous inof^llApproved ibis Nci change The undcrsijjr inlormalion a coir^plctcd ir> paid by ihc C issued and p hercir\ is nov ByV ARCHl In JCCordan data compri ihc ^ imlicaicd. I the CunUa MAUOCUM flit amum C T C702 (Instructions on reverse side) PACt ONt CT 2 PACIS. Garage APPLICATION NO: I Distribution to: •□ OWNERPERIOD TO: 1-1-93 □ARCHITECTr, ‘ □ CONTRACTORLister ARCHITECT'S gPROJECT NO: . g________CONTRACT DATE; August 31, 1992I in connection with the Contract.AIA Document C703, is attached.TRACT SUM........................................t 31.000,00hange Orders .........................................................Q.QQI TO DATE (Line 1 ±2).........................$ 31.000.00ED & STORED TO DATE.....................$ 5.200.00in C703)inpleted Work $______520.70__h E on C703)red Material $______n C703)Line 5a + 5b orimn I of C703).................................. j_____ npQ.QQ .ESS RETAINACE.................................t A.ftRO.nn Line 5 Total) CERTIFICATES FOR irre 6 from prior Certificate)................$ Q.QQ due .................................................. 4.6BO.On -nSM, PLUS RHAINACE.......................1 26.170.nn Line 6) ________________ ^ County of: Milwaukee ??!U2-feL«fore me this 22jn& day of December io92 'A./-/..// A/c#' pites: i3 pernattent O................................................................................................. ( H mount certi/i-d di//erj From the mount applied for.) --------—-------- " —------------ Dale: - J«^ofiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the k »cceptance of payment arc without u\€ Owner or Contractor under Ihls Conlr^t, APP N ANU CbKllliCAlt I'UK PAYMtINI AIA UUlUMLNI LWUJ tlnsnuctiof^s reverse side) i-ACtontTO (OWNER):City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FROM (CONTRACTOR):Allied Mechanical Systems 3A0 Michigan St., Hutchinson, MN 55350 CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Work PROJECT:Orono City ilall/Police and Public Works Buildings APPLICATION NO: 8 iPERIOD TO: 12-31-92VIA (ARCHITECT): ARCHITECT'SBoarntan Kroos Pfistor and Assoc. PROJfcCT NO: 1124.04 222 North Second StreetMinneapolis, MN 55401 CCNTRA'IT DATE:Dislribulion to:□ OWNER□ ARCHITECT ’□ CONTRACTOR□ .□ ‘CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENTCHANCE ORDER SUMMARYChange Orders approved in previous tnonihs by OwnerTOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS8,086.71Approved this Month 1,672.00 Nuinber Date Approved CO 2 TOTALS Net change by Change Orders f9 75R.71) information and beliel the work coverea oy mis Appiicmiun lur i n<i> toinplcicd in accordance with the Contract Documents, llial all amounts have been p.ud by the Conlr.ictor (or Work lor which previous Ccililicales (or Payment were issued and payments received (rom the Owner, and llral current payment shov.'n herein is now due. CONll^TOR: Allied Mechanical Systems of Hutchinson, Inc. Jr i ^^7 • M flyV Dale:17-71-97 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In acc 'fclance wilh Ihc Contract Documents, based on on-siio observations and the data CO. orising the above application, llte Archiiccl cerldies to the Owner that to the best of the \r< •* ietl's knowledge, inlormalion andbclici the Work has progressed as indicated, the qualily of die Work is in accoidante with the Contract Documents, .md Ihc Contractor is entitled to payment o( the AMOUNT CERIIHfD. Application is made for P.iymenl, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Documenl u703, 1$ attached.1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM......................................$ --------2. Net change by Change Orders ...................................$ —o n*^/' oo ---------3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2).......................S 3°0«-----------4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE...................$ - 377 ,021 i29-----------(Column C on C703)5. RETAINACE:a. -JLD % o( Completed Work $ ■37-,-SQ2-.13Q--------(Column D r- E on C703)b. iQ % of Sto.ed Material $-------lOQ tQQ , . . (Column F tm G703I Tolal Reiainage (Line 5a i 5b or Total in Column I ol G703)...................................1 ' n^o ^lo 90 0. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINACE...............................S (Line 4 less Line 5 Tolal) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (l ine 6 (rom prior Cerli(icale)......... $ ' nn 0. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE............................................$------ 0. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINACE.....................$ 40,922.00 _____(Line 3 less Line 61 __________________________ Stale o(: 6k3^7 MlnAesota Subscribed and ikotn \p belor^ me Notary Public: My CommissioiVfxpires: AMOUNT CERTiriED.................................... (Attach c^pfjfintion if amount certified differs from (he amount applied foe) ARCHITECT; Boatman Kroos Pfister and Associates By;Dale; This Ccililicate is not negoliabic. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only lo the Cont.-actor named heiein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice lo any rights ol Ihc Owner or Cm,t, actor under this Contract. A!A OOCUMtNt C70J • AITltCATlON ANt) CtRnftlLAft fOH IWMINI • MAY HOT tOlttON ' AIA- • t. ml Till AMIHICAN INSTiruTl Of AHCHIUOS, 171S NIW YOHK AVirrut. N W.. WASltlNt.ION, DC. JOOrH, WAfUlirrQ; l^nl!ctnJ»rt photocopying vlol»t»» I' 4 r.opyrighi l»w^ tnd i* lubjtcllo'co** prosecution. C702-1DW MOT [•EWt MlFlW QOMira TO: FROM: DATE; Ron Moorse, City Administrato Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk January 21, 1993 lA % SUBJECT: Establish Wednesday, April 29, 1993 for 1993^^1^ of Review Meeting // Board At the Council's January 11 meeting Council determined that Hennepin County's suggested date of April 28 was not acceptable and suggested either the 27th or 29th of April as the date of the 1993 Board of Review. I have been in contact with two Councilmembers, Rolf Erickson and Tom May at the County Assessor's office and it has been determined that Thursday, April 29, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. would be an agreeable date for them. Because Hennepin County must have notices printed with the date of this meeting for all property owners it is necessary to confirm a date as soon as possible. 11 crrrcf C <C‘;o L HENNEPIN DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 22, 1992 Dorothy M. Hallin Donald F. Monk 1993 Local Board of Review Dates DEC 2 9 1992 Wednesday April 28. 1993 Day of the Week Date Minnesota Law requires that I, as County Assessor, set the date for your Local Board of Review meeting. After reviewing previous meeting days and your suggestions of last year, the above date was selected I sincerely hope that it is agreeable with your council. As there must be a quorum, I would suggest that an informal review of your members with a request that they mark their calendars would be appropriate. Please confirm the date set out or call Tom May at 348-3046 with your alternative date by January 15, 1993, so that our printing order can be completed on time. We suggest starting times of 6:30, 7:00, or 7:30 p.m., but will discuss it with you if you wish a different time. Your early completion and return of the attached tear off strip will be appreciated and we will send your official notice for posting as required by law. Please return to JoDee Nelson, A-2103 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487. Municipality: Date: Time: Place: Confirmation firmed For selecting meeting dates information will be helpful _ in future years, the following ! r TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 22, 1993 C/fy^ / % SUBJECT: Hennepin County Ground Water Plan % % Hennepin County has prepared a draft County Ground Water Protection Plan. Several cities have expressed concern that the Flan duplicates regulations being developed by other government agencies and unnecessarily creates a new level of government to address ground water issues. In reviewing the County's Plan in light of these concerns, it is clear the Plan does duplicate the work the Minnesota Department: of Haalth is doing regarding well head protection. If the City is to be subject to new regulations regarding well head protection it is at least preferable that the number of organizations to which the City is responsible regarding these regulations be limited as much as possible. The Plan creates a County wide joint powers organization to coordinate the implementation of the ground water plan and assures cities the County will provide the technical staff for the organization. Although the technical assistance would be helpful to cities this would put the County into the lead position in developing regulations and would relegate small cities such as Orono to a small role and in all probability little control in the process. The Plan does provide a very good outline of information useful to cities in planning their ground water protection activities. As such, it is an excellent technical assistance tool. It would be much more useful to the City if the County concentrated on providing technical assistance versus imposing a plan on cities. The County Board has scheduled a public hearing to receive comments regarding the plan. The hearing will be held on Thursday, February 4th. The Council may want to send a letter to the County Board prior to the hearing expressing the concerns indicated above. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 20, 1993 fljv SUBJECT:Receipt of the Certificate of Achievement for'lfl^^^^ence in Financial Reporting - 1991 - Financial Repor Attachment:Notification Letter From Government Finance Officers Association Dated 12/18/92; Sample News Release; Award of Financial Reporting Achievement The City of Orono has been awarded the G.F.O.A.'s Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended December 31, 1991. This is the fifth consecutive year the City has earned the certificate. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. Congratulations to Finance Director Tom Kuehn, and to his staff for their ongoing efforts, and to the audit staff of Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich and Co. for their valuable assistance, and to the City Council for the leadership in supporting and encouraging the City to seek this award. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by that the Council congratulate Finance Director Tom Kuehn and the financial staff for the City's obtaining the G.F.O.A. Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the 1991 Comprehensive Annual Finance Report; and acknowledges the valuable assistance provided by the audit staff of Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich and Co. Ayes , Nays GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180 North Michigan Avenue. Suite 800, Chicago. Illincis 60601 312/977-9700 • Fax: 312/977-4806 December 18, 1992 The Honorable Barbara A. Peterson Mayor City of Orono P.O. Box 56 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 ■71 cmrcfcrjotio * r ^a EiEQWir-i DEC 2 9 1992 Dear Mayor Peterson; We are pleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual finan cial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991 qualifies for a Certificate of Achiev'" ent for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The Certificate *f Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represe*its a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. When a Certificate of Achievement is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement is also presented to the individual designated by the government as primarily respons.ihle for its having earned the certificate. Enclosed is an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement for; Thomas M. Kuehn, Finance Director. The Certificate of Achievement plaque will be shipped under sepa rate cover in about eight weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presentation of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. To assist with this, a sample news release and the 1991 Certificate Program results are enclosed. We hope that your example will encourage other government offi— cials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excellence in financial reporting. Sincerely, GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Stephen J. Gauthier Director/Technical Services Center SJG/kas Enclosures WASHINGTON OFFICE 1750ft Street N W. So**20006 202/429-2750 • 202/429-2755 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1G0 North Michigan Avenue. Suite 800. Chicago. Illinois 60601 312/977-S700 • Fax: 312/977-4006 December 18, 1992 NEWS RELEASE For information contact: Stephen Gauthier (312) 977-970 (Chicago)—The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Finan cial Reporting has been awarded to: CITY OF ORONO by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR). The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and finan cial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to the individual designated as primarily responsible for preparing the award-winning CAFR. This has been presented to: THOMAS M. KUEHN, FINANCE DIRECTOR The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel tc meet the high standards of the program including oemonstrating a construc tive “spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the CAFR. The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving 12,300 government finance professionals with offices in Chicago, Illinois, and Washinnton, D.C. - 30 - WASHINGTON OFFICE •I7V1 If CtTMt N W SmW 200. WMtwnaxtn. O C 20006 The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada presents this AWARD OF FINANCIAL REPORTING ACHIEVEMENT to: Thomas M. Kuehn Finance Director • ft I • # ft ^ •• •• • « • City of Orono, Minnesota • » . • The Awani of Financml Reporting Achievement is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association to those individuak who have been instrumental in their government unit achieving a Cerfi/icflff of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. A Certificate of Achievement is presented to those goitemment units whose annual financial reports are judged to adhere to program standards and represents the highest award in government financial reporting. Executive Director Date December 18, 1992 I TO;Mayor and City Council FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:January 21, 1993 /7 SUBJECT: Excess Liability Coverage At the December 14 Council meeting staff made a recommendation to the Council regarding excess liability coverage and the waiver of the City's statutory liability limits based on information provided by the City's insurance agent. At that time the Council requested staff to clarify the issue of the waiver of the liability limits. After reviewing the issue with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust and the City's insurance agent, the insurance agent indicated the information he provided to us was not correct. The excess liability insurance and liability limit waiver issues are two separate and independent issues. Excess Liflilitv Insurange _ The City nnually purchases a liability insurance policy in the Ci'-y also annually purchases excess liability insurance in the amount of $2,000,000. This is to cover the City in the case of a liability claim that falls outside of the statutory limits, such as a federal civil rignts action. It is recommended that the City continue to purchase the excess liability coverage. Waiver ff Liability Limits attached i- no from the LMCIT uses the example of an accident which injures numerous people. If the $600,000 amount is divided among a.U those, pec ole, the amount of compensation paid to any individual is fao lv smill. The waiver of the liability limits along with the excess li.bUity coverage would enable the city to provide additional compensation to those people The waiver of the liability limits and the associated excess liability coverage doe not provide additional benefits to the city, it provides additional ability to compensate injured parties. VS. $22,587) At this time the Council may choose to confirm its action of S^cember 14 which waived the city's liability limits or to reconsider and keep the liability limits in effect. i 1 \ 1 LMcn 9. EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE LIMITS What can go wrong The statutes limit the city's tort liability to $600,000 per occurrence. LMCIT provides a standard $600,000 liability coverage limit to match the statutory limit. However, there are several ways in which that coverage could turn out not to be enough. For example: - The statutory limits don't apply to some of the city's liability exposures. Some possible examples are liability under the federal civil rights laws; liability assumed by contract; liability for actions in another state (under an inter-state mutual aid agreement, or while a city officer is attending an out-of-state conference, for example); or inverse condemnation liabil'^ty for land I'se regulation actions. - The LMCIT liability coverage includes annual aggregate limits on the products liability coverage, the limited pollution liability coverage, and the land use liability coverage. If the city should experience more than one liability incident in one of these areas in a single year, the city's LMCIT coverage might not cover the full extent of the city's liability under the statute. - Although the statutory liability limits have now been tested several times in court and have been upheld, it is still conceivable that the courts might someday change their minds and hold the municipal tort liability limits unconstitutional. All of these represent ways in which the city could conceivably end up with more liability than it has coverage. If so, the city would have to bear the excess from its own resources. There's another issue too that some view as a problem. The tort liability limits literally mean that if an injured individual's proven damages exceed the statutory limits, he will not be fully reimbursed for the damage he has suffered because of the city s negligence. Since the statutes include a "per-occurrence limit as well as a ’'per-clairoant" limit, an individual's reimbursement could be severely limited if a number of other people were also injured in the same incident. E.g.,‘if 60 people were injured in a single incident - say a bleacher collapses, or a city vehicle hits a school bus full of Kids - there could be as little as $10,000 available under the statutory limits to compensate each person. In other words, the statutory liabili / limits mean that sometimes an individual will not be fully compensated for the damage the city has caused. Hnw to avoid the problem Thp citv should consider purchasing higher limits of liability coverage. LKCIT makes available up to $5,000,000 of additional limits at the city's option. liability limits to the extent of the city's excess coverage a?, injured partron a claim where the statutory liability limits would otherwise limit the amount the claimant could recover. Riivina hiaher liability coverage limits gives the city better orotectioragainst the risks il faces. IjfltS Vt-puqh that buying expensive "waiver" option doesn't give the c^ty any hSfrS? IrotLtion: rather, it gives the person the Ktter Erot^rLion bv allowi?^ him to recover more tha.i ue wou^d otheiv'ise be able to from the city. There's no Sir.pie "right" answer to the question of whether your city should buy excess liability coverage lr.rits, and if so ?drLrdiL?it?s^ary‘5ic-!^nr;h^?^:;?y"2hr= Till tS? City might injure, respectively) arc worth that additionax expenditure of city funds. sometimes city officials reason that "we're only a so we don't need high liability coverage limits. But arguably the opposite is true: A big city has much more tax many more taxpayers over which to spread, say, a , , excLrjudgemLt; in a small city, the burden per taxpayer could be enormous. .mM n LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF JANUARY 25, 1993 Cigarette License: LeRoy Koehnen Navarre Amoco 3360 Shoreline Drive Richard Keaveny Keaveny's Navarre Drug 3425 Shoreline Drive Ronald Steffenhagen Orono Golf Course 265 Orono Orchard Road Steven Corl Navarre Liquor's Inc. 3421 Shoreline Drive James G. Holtz Jimmie's Inc. 3380 Shoreline Drive Michael J. Mehner Crystal Bay Service 3398 North Shore Drive William W. Wear Orono Shopping Center 2160 Wayzata Boulevard Richard Bloomquist Ricks Super Valu 3333 Shoreline Drive On Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Grant R. Wenkstern Lake View Golf Course 405 North Arm Drive X' in CIT*of ORONO Post OffJce Box 66•Crystal ^y.^linnesota 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka JAM 2. 0 1993 AOMISIMR-ATION - 473-735S FAX - 473-0510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1, Name of Applicant Mailing Address 3 3 S>^M2L\ ki » « • » «• M «» A . • ^ t I i ¥ ' 'w t >*11 t UA t t Wl ^*1 \k/f f L/ crkiMirr nccrrcr - MII luC ui I j City/State/Zip Code kl/C^(JVf/Z\QjS. Phone Number ^ ^ 7/ _________ i ti/l .la^ VifVi/V T«» &. fc.\/ • ri/> , ^ Vt \ i-urrir-.-I /i.wA -■HElEIPT-ThM you 2. Sales Location: Name .on: rf/k'i/14-1^1 (?f- A yyln i TfVif Dni Tj fTaLU'w’w^w'V i.-V'Vl nWfi f J. ^ 01/2. Street Address ’^3/fpQ S/Cig A / Vf ig Mailing Address 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the city of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OP ORON Signature of applicant Dated ^_~5 IT Y of ORONO Post Offife BoxAG* Crystal Bay, Minnesota 56323 • Municipal Offices ^ O ••w w * On the North Shine ofjLake Minnetonka AD.MIM>TR,\T10.N - 473-7358 FAX-473-0510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 CTrCr- CPO^ 1. Name of Applicant / \ , ,rt^ </ /Ij Au>______ Mailing Address 1 1 S^«-cy£^- ff/u^ ^c>9 City/State/Zip Code Phone Number .3jTca! ^JOi rrrv nc norikin a ~ S / A ^ OFFICE 4?1 4-9>j0 m------- 01 CES 20.men—Jk----20. 2. Sales Location: \/ A^ ^ J)fZ ijzrziZfT^jUKiiw vm l\U.k. UAI I /l4rMfl\ «UW.' r.^i QAi T1rr^u%jfrU urW'A isyjl i d. 01/1 Name / street Address Mailing Address Phone Number 3 /«?-/< a;7 Zf ’T's 3. Principal business carried on at this location / ( ! ' ) 4, Method of Sales: Over Counter Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter . 1 ITYof ORONO Post OfOfc Boxi66» Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323* Municipal Offices On the North Shme of^ake Minnetonka ADMIMSTR.ATION - 473.7358 FAX - 4734)510 ^ O W • APPLICATIOH FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Otono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant f ^ < g/> ^ /U u/ Mailing Address Hill h,-xl'V ^ City/State/Zip Code _ Phone Number I CTfcr cpofa)mi ^ /4/u,f >J 7/ - i //. «, rrry nr npni^p cruAiu-r nccrrcI aitniti/u u'l I .1/1. 01 CEH 20, •. ----Tk------20. /-'iT r z Sales Location: Name • • V ,^clcIPT-THM you u-h^aa/) T/Vif riissjl ill. Oi/U Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number 5 C/2-^(AJ ,/ AjAtL^A-A^i^ MJ 3. Principal business carried on at this location -t / 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter L / / Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license^ Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. \qiT Y of ORONO Post Office Box 64»Cr|stal Bay. Minnesota 55323*Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ADMINISTRATION -473-7358 FAX - 473-0510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Ocono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant __ Mailing Address ^ ^ ^ cviq 23 city/state/zip Code ^ Phone Number 3 H B3__________________ 2. Sales Location: Name O ^r\V\<r^ (3 cuKJ<^ Street Address t> H Mai.ling Address f^aX Phe ne Number ^ ^ 3 7 '/O^ ( j?^v .^11. . rjTJ^ J 3, Principal business carried on at this location (3 O [ 4, Method of Sales: Over Counter Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July 1,3^ Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OF ORONO Dated 53.24 Czd£- other at the ‘r « *nn/sota the Quarterly periods- license, license tj,e icable, as m lie this may CITY of OBONOPost 0fricfc Box 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323*Municipal OfficesOfi the North Shof¥of Lake Minnetonka admimstrmion -473-735SFAX-47X1510APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 19 CITY nonunidl i I in \ji\unu c rkf^Airc nrcTrCI Ul f irti VC.<L. t,*t t 1. Nane of Applicant Mailing Address City/State/Zip Code Phone Number 2. Sales Location: f 7f f OnnAAA JL%.‘X N,'V MVAAR6 UQUORS INC. BOX 117 rurn-'iwi 2&.un u-m—20, 11 20. ^ NAVARRE. MN 65392 ^ Pit 471^00 liECElPT-TPAiK YOU 12SS^^0~Ct0t~^ Tli Oi/li Name K>J IK'« Street Address Mailing Address Phone Number .0^^ V vrv ‘^'W- 3. Principal business carried on at this location 4 Method of Sales: Over Counter Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: V V V Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license. Jan. 31. each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. lake remittance payable to: CITY OP ORONO Signature of applicant Dated J^3> T Y of ORONO Post Office Box fjb*C/ysLaI Bay, Minnesota 55323* Municipal Offices ...III On the North Shore of LakT%Iinnetonka AD.MI.NISTJtATIO.N -473-7358 fax -4734)510 'JAM 2 1 1993 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL 19 ? 5 Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 /1. Name of Applicant Mailing Address City/State/Zip Code , y^-W. ^"'5^ Phone Number 4^77 ^ 2— _ _ 2. Sales Location: r rry nr ncr»wfi U .i I f Ul U/lTu f/.V4,vr£ OFFICE Name f 7i 1 r'nnn,y) Street Address 33 S't>'fy , f 3 .A wa 4 vv-wir ^ -S (j 1 £f#VTTsrx7t • V OCTZluT^7U±iJki Ynii l\L,UUll TTfc. V-'w’U'i-\/ UV\/X Mailing Address A''<^ ^ A^A^- ^^3*?2 Phone Number ^ '7! 7 CC>C> «—wM n i A f Wl I A .A Af /r^ivi/ 3. Principal business carried on at this location 7^^ > 4. Method of Sales; Over Counter v/^Other I hereby make application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to; CITY OP ORONO Signature of applicant Dated ■'-/5'7^, CITY ORONO Fost Office Box G6» Crystal Baji, Miinesota 55323* Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ADMIMSTR.AT10V - Ali-'Jf* fA.\-47>Of 10 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL I Ocono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant HicK^el Mailing Address (ViOriVv SViQre PplUe City/State/Zip Code OpOHO NA\nT\_____Fi 5^ ^ | Phone Number ^ ^ I O | ^3 2. Sales Location: Name Location: Cri^r'1.5\ Bay SerUtce street Address ^ ^ M Q tH" W Mailing Address CO ^___________________________ Phone Number M ^ | O I ________________________ Or i >/g / ttV r/f nft>rfAfn W X f i i/< i.'l cy\iAAirr nccTr^ I VI I 1 4 ^ ’ •- » It >» l» OA r^ /«v t- f 01 Jf.v —K :o.c itECElPT-THAiiK YOU L.L f tf iS 3. ^ ^ l\UVL.AI I t liruui • %/w Principal business carri6d on at this location oC? \/ 1 CvOl C4e^'\lor\ _________________________ \/A/ 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter other I hereby make apolication for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location ‘subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: VL Feb-Mat-Apr May-June-July ^ Aug-Sept-Oct LICENSE FEES Nov-Dec-Jan Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 pet quarter. Make remittance payable to: CITY OP jJ)RONO 0 Signature of applicant Dated .QLnrb^lv. fqqg CITY of ORONO Tost Office Box 66•Crystal Bay. MiijnesI la 5S323 • MunidpaJ Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka administration - 473-7358 FAX - 473-0510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL 19 Orono Municipal Code Section 5.24 1. Name of Applicant Mailing Address ci<3<r7' ^ ^ ^ '7^City/State/Zip Code ^ Phone Number >^73 — 7^ /* 2. Sales Location: Name 1*3 j> £> a.. O^-tyTa/2, Street Address _ Mailing Address Phone Number arr of ordhq rr#M4«-r nrcrrc ^~^!20000GX %/A X 01 QFH 20.C 20.C y":$ — r’ iitiS It RECEIPT-TH^:< YOU JOdWTCOOTWl 715 01/21 3. Principal business carried on at this location — Oc 1 ■£_ ^ _ .t 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter AT Other I hereby maxe application for license to sell cigarettes at retail at the above location subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Orono during the following quarterly periods: Feb-Mar-Apr LICENSE FEES May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan Expiration date of license. Jan, 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Make remittance payable to; CITY OF ORONO Signature of applicant Dated 9^ CITY c/f ORONO Post Offu'c Box 66•Crystal Bay, MinriestXi 55323• Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka A DM IN ISTR.ATIOS - 473-7358 FAX - 473-0510 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL 19 <7 ^ 1, Name of Applicant Mailing Address Otono Municipal Code Section 5.24 IC h S I' LAcz /r) V 'j /i07R Loi! )p 11 Dk///9 City/State/Zip Code P J ^ V Phone Number _______________^ ^ 7 f 2. Sales Location-0 Name ! t K I Street Address Mall' Phone Number T-S'j’yz- A/x-iJ'7/ !<‘/7J 3. Pcincipal business cacried on at this location 4. Method of Sales: Over Counter K Other Cl7) OF 0f<D,i0 EI^AtiCE OFFICE 1311200000 A< rCff 20 Ot X X y :X Feb-Mar-Apr May-June-July Aug-Sept-Oct Nov-Dec-Jan LICENSE FEES Expiration date of license, Jan. 31, each year. Annual license fee is $20.00. Where applicable, as in the case of seasonal sales, this may be pro rated by quarters, at $5.00 per quarter. Ha>«« remittance payable to: CITY ,OR^P Signature of applicant Dated / / "• % • Date: To: From: Subject: January 21, 1993 pri Moorse, City Administrator Lt. Gary Cheswick Liquor License Renewal Lakeview Golf Course Police reports contained within the Orono Police Department have been reviewed regarding Lakeview Golf Course. As no liquor related violations were foriid, I have no objection to the issuance of this license. . > ! Ill III tSii. liM KiUil I Hin^r lit ^«ll \|»;» liquor “ON” 1*^1111^1^. (■., II rh / • I NiMvti IWoiM r«f RETAIL “ON SALE” ^tatc of itiinnesfota, HENNKPIN j CITYcou.vrr of To the..........COUNCIL................................................CITY................ ................................................................................State of Minnesota: __Qi(Kf\\-...__________________________________________ ______„ hereby appl ..XSXfor a lie^nM for ih* term of ........... from the-------------f lRST......... .... .... day of ........JANUARY ORONO • •• •••.< ORONO FIRST At Retail Only, Non-Intoxicatinsr Malt Liquors, , 1P ..5.3, fc, f,u f ' 04 th4 iame are defined by law, for consumption those certain premises in the C'lTY ORONO ‘ A' ■ . '• ef •: f described <u follows, io-uit:. ........ at which plaoe said applicant . ..operate. the business of -I4K CITY OF ORCHO fwrce office mil 00000 01 CEH 75.00 LUCK ^ H 75.00 r-.r !•••••••« »•••• 0/ YOU ________________________............... ;/• * I and to that end represent... and state ..as follows: That taid applicant A<...................cttUcr. of th. United State; of good moral eharacUr and repute; and tuK attained the age of tl ytare; that............iaiA . ..................proprietor ......of the establishment for which the license trill be issued if this application is granted. That no manufacturer of such non-intoxicating malt liqi ors hoe any oumership, in whole or in part, in said business of said applicant . or any interest therein; That said applicant make this applUaiion pu^suojit and subject to cU t ie laws of the State of Minnesota and the oniin^nces and rtgulo'.ic^s of said .......9.1 ................................. applUahle therein, which are hereby male a part hereof, and hereby agree to observe and obey the same; 715:37 Cl/19/93 I • * f* A,* > ' (Haro «uu am, II mmf. mt tmml rtrilUlMa)• %'•• ; ii X . • > "y * •J . i** V; K' •,,i. • - '• I • !•*. • • • • Fach app/n ant further statex that hy the commencement of buunexx and by July I of each suci eediny year said upplii ant will have paid tLe Federal .Special (hcuf>auonat Ta.% to the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for 0 retail dealer. ^ :/• -I I' f •**r: V * f * • e , • t ’ ’ i‘ I \ ^ » • 4;‘ •mi- • f • .« * . V •,s •* V Dated -......-----, 19 • . • • ^ - •• dpplUanl..^ ■ %« *• • *. • r. O. dddnm 7/0_/V). iiw. V A'.. ^ • __ _____________f7)rd_____________ \' »* .• ?- V ' •••.' • * • > • . • I'«. 4 *1 •.• • I*” ♦ ! • • V. r. a "rratUTr% • • ••— ! ■, 1 • V' .•• ' ‘i, 4 • ' • » 01/17/93 PR CB FRREQOR 160 EMP • NAME DPT 471688060 474563339 476921819 471840871 475443862 4725039S1 469526026 475989721 468821018 472529007 468701«6" 5075 469' .6562 46 .20832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500666 477500666 475444249 477463877 A71569863 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 480843542 477700023 334506281 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 470566529 4696291«< 4755591.' 26746004.; 472563051 47'.663296 470704904 475505292 46862948S 500403192 ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOB2IEN, SUE A BORIS. SCOTT W BOSMA. JAMTE L BR7NKHAUS. JOHN F CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI, JAY C ENGLISH III. IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICH. DAN T FRITZLER, JOHN M GAFFRON, MICHAEL GERHARDSON. JOHN GOMAN. DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D DOROTHY M STEVEN C STEVEN C CAROL J CAROLE BRADLEY P RICKY D JANICE M CHARLOTTE THOMAS M P R HALLIN. HANSEN. HANSEN. HANSING HASEMAN JOHNSON KARNITZ KENNEN, KNUTSON KUEHN. MABUSTH. JEANNE A MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NELSON. DAVID D OBERAIGNER. SCOTT Q OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A QUASI. WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B CKREEN, DALE S iTEFFENHAGEN. RONALD SULLIVAN, STEPHEN X THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK. MARK W VANG, BRUCE L VEE. LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA G 31 31 31 12 42 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 35 42 12 42 42 31 12 ?l 31 31 15 15 33 31 12 31 35 42 92 33 42 92 92 31 42 93 31 31 31 31 33 12 15 m • « YTD GROSS 39 87 01 64 55 92 93 38 28 3849 2004 553 1237 3184 3361 3140.60 2824.80 3135.98 3192.08 3746.68 3293 2911 4063 369.66 3210.63 2507.96 1055.17 2X83.76 1087.62 1821.02 3129.12 127.53 481 92 2004 87 4283.00 3645 97 2392 80 4767 3319 293 2676 2579.80 2911.37 2207 2699 2362 773 2340 2507 4068 3012 2938 3186.36 2507.96 1922.17 2325.23 95 92 73 63 14 73 82 97 21 96 78 02 56 477881539 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J 33 2208.91 / o / CURRENT GROSS 1812.60 1014.64 398.51 611.42 1611.68 1680.96 1524.38 1284.00 1469.27 1579.82 1469.28 1616.96 1473.43 1937.43 238.55 1457.45 1269.28 38.00 1428.59 555.22 913.20 1526.40 127.53 233.79 1014 2167 1845 1141 2311 84 1526.40 132.26 1202.78 1469.21 1473.43 1202.79 1366.32 1266.08 212 54 1266 1269 2059 1469 1469 1526 1269 963 1176 64 60 21 13 1117 92 06 28 20 28 28 40 28 92 80 59.222.04 ■ f' Vi ■ % -M I ■'I' * • « • • '* ' • ■•.X- ► • r V* ( f •a • .'m- ■ .* • • A ■ V ■ ■ ■ ■ ;. .-i'ft-''i ■’v.'. -..V •J‘V‘ • V' r » .V r I CITY OF ORONO POST FRI, JAM 8, 1993, 11:18 AM---req: LINDA- VOID, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF •loc: FINANCE. .job: 1188 #S2980. . . Batch File: HC1231 Page 1 prog: OH450 <1.51>----report id: TRBPROOF Invoice Nunbcr Invoice Amt Units Inv Date Vendor 10 / PEDB Cd / Addr Cd Term ACCOUNT NUMBER Secondary Ref Distribution Amt Tax Tax Amt Due Date Vendor Name Misc Post PROGRAM / OBJECT Encb PO# / Pmt Discount Amt Tax2 Tax2 Amt Pst Date Vendor Address Rfnd Fmt Product ID Retail Amt Chrg Charge Amt Ck ID-No Vendor City, State Zip SpCk CkTy /Item Description--Item Description Duty Duty Amt Batch ID Division Code and Description R1/2 Prep BssrssasssssBBsa BSXSSSSSSSSBBSSa BSXssaBs:as=ssxs=xBsas=:sszsBa BSSB BBSS 999-2032-9999-00 000026 78.74 1 12/01/92 227 F PR .000 BAUNCE SHEET PAYROLL CL 12/01/92 FIRST NAT BANK LAKES 01 ACCRUED riCA PAYABLE O.CO 12/31/92 2445 SHAOrUOOO RO NB 0.00 OR009185 NAVARRE, MN 55392 HU FICA 12-1-92 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW Net Amount:78.74 i 001-1050-9001-00 5073 143.00 1 12/01/92 678 P PR .000 BALANCE SHEET GENERAL FU 645.93 12/01/92 SAFE BENEFITS Of CASH DUE FROM P/R ACCOUN 0.00 12/31/92 6681 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE NB 0.00 OR009186 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 HU DEC FEE HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Met Amount:645.93 2 001-A306-0299-52 5073 143.00 1 12/01/92 678 P PR .000 SPECIAL PROJECT CONTING 143.00 12/01/92 SAFE BENEFITS Dt OTHER CONSULTING SERVICE 0.00 12/31/92 6681 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE MB 0.00 OR00918J h.’NNcAPOLIS, MN 55427 HU DEC FEE HC1231 AP ALuUUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:143.00 3 001-4356-0129-31 000028 10.00 1 12/02/V2 T101 P PR .000 POLICE DIV EXPENSE 10.00 12/01/92 GOLDEN valley COiW’RY CLUB 01 NEETINCS-CONF-SCHOOLS 0.00 12/31/92 No Address Lines NB 0.00 0R009:87 ifU MEETING HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:10.00 4 001-4356-0129-31 000029 10.00 1 12/02/92 T101 P PR .000 POLICE DIV EXPENSE 10.00 12/01/92 GOLDEN VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB 01 MEETlNGuCONF-SCHOOLS 0.00 12/31/92 No Address Lines NB 0.00 0R009188 HU MEETING MC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:10.00 5 999-2032-9999-00 000030 2.592.75 1 12/09/92 227 P Pt .000 BAUNCE SHEET PAYROLL Cl 2,592.75 12/01/92 FIRST NAT BANx LAXES 01 ACCRUED FICA PAYABLE 0.00 12/31/92 2445 SHAOTWOOO RO NB 0.00 GROG M91 NAVARRE, MN 55392 NU FICA 12-9 MC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:2,592./5 6 00t-4152*0039*12 000031 16.99 1 12/14/92 143 P Hi .000 admin DIV EXPENSE 16.99 12/01/92 COMMERCIAL LIFE/CRP 01 LIYI INSURANCE 0.00 12/31/92 IS CORPORA12 PL S NB c.oo OB009192 PISCATAUAY. NJ 08854 NU DEC INS MC1231 AP ACCOUNTS payable LU Met 16.99 7 4 CITT OF ORONO POST FRI, JAM 8, 1993, 11:18 AM-*-req: LIMDA-- VOID, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF Batch FHe: HC1231 P«8« 2 •••loc: FINANCE. .job: 1188 <fS2980. . . . . .prog: OH450 <1.51>-”*report Id: TRBPROOF ACCOUNT NUMBER PROGRAM / OBJECT Invoice Nutrber Secondary Ref Encb PO# / Pmt Product ID Item Description- Invoice Amt Units Distribution Amt Tax Tax Amt Discount Amt Tax2 Tax2 Amt Retail Amt Chrg Charge Amt •Item Description Duty Duty Amt 001-4152-0069-15 FIMANCE OIV EXPENSE LIFE INSURANCE isas Bsassasssssaaasa 000033 aasaBaartasBaBBaa aaaBaaBaaaBaBBaa 32.05 1 32.05 0.00 0.00 DtC INS Net Amount: 001-4152-0129-31 POLICE OIV EXPENSE LIFE INSURANCE 000034 DEC INS Net Amount: 001-4T52-0129-31 POLICE OIV EXPENSE LIFE INSTANCE 000C35 DEC INS Net Amount: 001-4152-0249-42 STREET OlVISION EXPENSES LIFE INSURANCE 000036 DEC INS Net Amount: 001-1298-9001-00 BALANCE SHEET GENERAL FU CLEARING A/C NON-EM HEAL 000057 OEC INS Net Amount: 672-4152-0549-81 WATER OP OIV EXPENSE LIFE INSURANCE 000038 OEC INS Net Amount: 673-4152-0569-82 SEWER OP OIV EXPENSE LIFE INSURANCE • iMJ OEC INS Net AlODunt: 32.05 59.78 1 59.78 0.00 0.00 59.78 6.99 1 6.99 0.00 0.00 6.99 20.19 1 20.19 0.00 0.00 20.19 1.95 1 1.95 0.00 0.00 1.95 2.02 2.02 0.00 0.00 2.02 2.63 1 2.63 0.00 0.00 2.63 Inv Date Due Date Pst Date Ck It-No Batch ID Vendor ID / PEOB Cd / Addr Cd Vendor Name Vendor Address Vendor City, State Zip Division Code and Description aaaaaaaa 12/14/92 12/01/92 12/31/92 OR009192 HC1231 aaaaatrsraBasaaaaaaai 143 P COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP 15 CORPORATE PL S PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 12/14/92 143 P 12/01/92 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP 12/31/92 15 CORPORATE PL S OR009192 PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 12/14/92 143 P 12/01/92 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP 12/31/92 15 CORPORATE PL S OR0091V2 PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 HC1231 AP ACroUNTS PAYABLE 12/14/92 143 P 12/01/92 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP 12/31/92 15 CORPORATE PL S OR009192 PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 12/14/92 143 P 12/01/92 COMMERCIAL LIFE/CRP 12/31/92 15 CORPORATE PL S OR009192 PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 12/14/92 143 P 12/01/92 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP 12/31/92 15 CORPORATE PL S OR009192 PISCATAW'.Y, NJ 08854 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 12/14/92 143 P 12/01/92 COMMERCIAL LIFE/ORP 12/31/92 15 CJRPOIATE PL B 0R009192 PISTATAWAY, NJ 08854 NC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PR Term Rise Post Rfnd Fmt SpCk CkTy R1/2 Prep .000 01 NB HU LU 8 PR .000 01 NB HU LU PR .000 01 NB Hk LU 10 PR .000 01 Ni MU LU 11 PR .000 01 NB HU LU 12 PR .000 01 NB NW LU "I PR .000 BU LW 14 CITY OP ORONO POST PRI, JAN 6, 1993, 11:18 AM---rcq: LINDA--- VOID, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF - -loc: FINANCE. . .job: 1188 #S2980. . . Batch Pile: HC1231 Page 3 prog: OH450 <1.51>- -report Id: TRBPROOF ACCOUNT NUHBER Invoice Number Secondary Ref Invoice Amt Distribution Amt Units Tax Tax Amt Inv Date Due Date Vendor ID / PEDB Cd / Addr Cd Vendor Name Tern Misc Post PROCKAM / OBJECT Encb PO# / Pmt Discount Amt Tax2 Tax2 Amt Pst Date Vendor Address Rfnd Ffflt Product ID Retail Amt Chrg Charge Amt Ck ID-No Vendor City, State Zip SpCk CkTy /Item Description--Item Description Duty Duty Amt Batch ID Division Code and Description R1/2 Prep ■■ssssssBsasBarssssBsssa aaaaaaaaaaarsssr a sa S3 ssajsaaaasas assssss-ssrsssss 33333333 aaaa uumm 674-4152-0590-83 000040 0.85 1 12/14/92 143 P PR .000 GOLF OP DtV EXPENSE 0.85 12/01/92 COHMERCIAL LI PE/GRP 01 LIFE INSURANCE 0.00 12/31/92 IS CORPORATE PL S NB 0.00 OR009192 PI SCATAWAY. NJ 088S4 Ny DEC INS HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:0.85 15 001-4152-0129-31 000041 7.00 1 12/14/92 143 P PR .000 POLICE DIV EXPENSE 7.00 12/01/92 COMMERCIAL LI PE/GRP 01 LIFE INSURANCE 0.00 12/31/92 15 CORPORATE PL S NB 0.00 OR009192 PISCaTAWAT, NJ 08854 HU DEC INS HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:7.00 16 425-4540-0480-00 000042 26."2 1 12/14/92 T126 P .coo CITY HALL CONSTR 26.52 12/01/92 ROADWAY EXPRESS 01 OFFICE PURN-PIXT-EQUIP 0.00 12/31/92 No Address Lines NB 0.00 OR009193 HW FREIGHT FOR TABLES HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:26.52 17 001-35C0-9001-00 000043 7.00 1 12/17/92 T006 P .000 BALANCE SHEET GENERAL PU 7.00 12/01/92 HN DEPT OP REVENUE 01 GEN TXBLE SALES-SERVICES 0.00 12/31/92 No Address Lines NB 0.00 OR009195 HW NOV SALES TAX MC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:7.00 18 001-3527-9001-00 000044 3.00 1 12/1T/92 T006 P .000 BALANCE SHEET GENERAL FU 3.00 12/01/92 MN DEPT OP REVENUE 01 POLICE REPORTS 0.00 12/31/92 No Address Lines NB 0.00 OR009195 NU NOV SALES TAX HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:3.00 19 001-4383-0129-31 000045 40.00 1 12/17/92 T127 P .000 POLIU OIV EXPENSE 40.00 12/17/92 HN C09!ESCE DEPT 01 LICENSES & TAXeS 0.00 12/31/92 No Address lines w w m 0.00 QR009196 mi NOTARY PEE HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU 00M283-9001-00 Net Amount:40.00 20 2,932.00 1 12/01/92 142 P PS .000 BALANCE SHEET GENERAL FU 2.932.00 12/18/92 COPT OUP PR INC 01 PREPAID NAINT-SAVIN COPY O.Oti 12/31/92 6636 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH MB 0.00 CR009197 RICHFIELD. P»N 55423 fiU HAINT CONTRACT 12/93 NC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:2,932.00 21 Clir OF ORONO POST FR:, jam 8, 1993, 11:18 AM---req: LINDA--- VOIO, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF ---loc: FINANCE. .job: 1188 #S2980. . . Batch File: HC1231 Page 4 prog: OH450 <1.51>- -report Id: TRbPROOF I Invoice Nimber Invoice Amt Unit*'Inv Date Vendor ID / PEDB Cd / Addr Cd Term ACCOUNT NUMBER Secondary Ref Distribution Amt Tax Tax Amt Due Date Vendor Name MI sc Post PROGRAM / OBJECT Encb PO# / Pmt Discount Amt Tax2 Tax2 Amt Pst Date Vendor Address Rfnd Fmt Product ID Retail Amt Chrg Charge Amt Ck lO-No Vendor City, State Zip SpCk CkTy /Item Description--Item Description Duty Duty Amt Batch ID Division Code and Description Rl/2 Prep ■rsssssacsssssssssssssssB 88SSZSSZSSSSSSSB S3SSSSSSSSSSSSSS s3ss=ss8=sssssra 33338333 ■BaSSSBSSS88BS83S38Sa88SSasaSa ■ S38 ■ BBS 001-1283-V001-00 000047 534.62 1 12/01/92 142 P PR .000 BALANCE SHEET GENERAL FU 534.62 12/18/92 COPY DUP PR INC 01 PREPAID MAINT-SAVIN COPY 0.00 12/31/92 6636 CE.OAC AVENUE SOUTH NB 0.00 OR009197 RICHMCLD, NN 55423 HU MAINT BAL 12-92 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW Net Amount:534.62 22 999-2031-9999-00 000048 4,575.90 1 12/06/92 597 P PR .000 BALANCE SHEET PAYROLL CL 4,575.90 12/21/92 PUBLIC Ert^L RET ASSN 01 ACCRUED PERA PAYABLE 0.00 12/31/92 514 ST PETER ST SUITE 200 NB 0.00 OR009198 ST PAUL, MN 55102 NU PERA 11/23-12/6 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU Net Amount:4,375.90 23 999-2032-9999-00 000049 :,825.21 1 12/22/92 227 P PR .000 BALANCE SHEET PAYROLL CL 2,825.21 12/22/92 FIRST NAT BANK LAKES 01 ACCRUED FICA PAYABLE 0.00 12/31/92 2445 SHAOYWOOO RD NB 0.00 OR009199 NAVARRE, KN 55392 KU FICA 12-22 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW Net Amount:2,825.21 24 001-4320-0249-42 000050 31.55 1 12/22/92 815 P PR .000 STREET DIVISION EXPENSES 31.55 12/22/92 US WEST CCMMJN 01 TELEPHONE 0.00 12/31/92 PO BOX 1301 NB 0.00 OkCC9200 MINNEAPOLIS, HN 55483 HW TELEPHONE HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW Net Amount:31,55 25 001-4320-0249-42 0000S1 48.93 1 12/22/92 815 P PR .000 STREET DIVISION EXPENSES 48.93 12/22/92 US WEST COHNUN 01 TELEPHONE 0.00 12/31/92 PO Bcm 1301 NB o.ou OR009200 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55483 HU TELEPHONE MC1231 AP ACCOUNYS PAYABLE LW Net Amount:48.93 26 001-4355-0069-15 000052 29.19 1 12/22/92 815 P PI .000 FINANCE DIV EXPENSE 29.19 12/22/92 US WEST COMMUN Of DATA PROCESSING 0.00 12/31/92 PO BOX 1301 IB 0.00 OR009200 MINNEAPOLIS, KM 5S48S NU DATA PROC HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE IW Net Amount:29.19 27 672-4355-0549-81 000053 23.88 1 12/22/92 815 P PR .000 UATEI OP UIV EXPENSE 23.88 12/22/92 US WEST comiN 01 DATA PROCESSING 0.00 12/31/92 PO BOX 1301 m 0.00 08009200 MINNEAPOLIS. MX 55483 ffii DATA ^OC NC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW Net Amount:23.88 28 CITY OF ORONO POST VOID, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF Batch File: HC1231 Page 5 FRI, JAN 8, 1993, 11:18 AM---rcq: LINDA. . .loc: FINANCE. . .job: 1188 #S2980. . . . . .prog: OM450 <1.51>- -report id: TRBPROOF ACCOUNT NUMBER PROGRAM / OBJECT Invoice Nunbcr Secondary Ref Encb PO# / Pmt Product ID Item Description Invoice Amt Distribution Amt Discount Amt Retail Amt Item Description Units Tax Tax2 Chrg Duty Inv Date Tax Amt Due Date Tax2 Amt Pst Date Charge Amt Ck ID-No Duty Amt Batch ID ■SS8«SSS3SeSSBBBSBaSBS«r SSBBSSBBBSSSBBBa BS3SBSSSSSS3SSSS BSSSSSSSBBasaBSa SSSSBSSB Vendor ID / PEDB Cd / Addr Cd Vendor Name Vendor Address Vendor City, State Zip Division Code and Description B8SSB8BSaaBBSBSaaBB8BBS«8aaSB« Term MIsc Rfnd SpCk R1/2 Post Fat CkTy Prep aaaa aaaa 673-4355-0569-82 SEUER OP DIV EXPENSE DATA ^’ROCESSING 000054 DATA PROC Net Amount: 001-1262-9001-00 BALANCE SHEET GENERAL FU NASSLER POSTAGE INVENTOR 000055 POSTAGE Net Amount: Batch ID: HC1231 System Computed Total: 35.38 35.38 0.00 0.00 1 35.38 900.00 1 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 15,644.05 12/22/92 12/22/92 12/31/92 OR009200 HC1231 815 P US WEST COMMUN PO BOX 1301 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55483 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE .000 01 MB NW LW 29 12/23/92 629 P 12/23/92 POSTMASTER 12/31/92 No Address Lines OR009201 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 HC1231 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PR .000 01 MB NW LU 30 User Computed Total:15,644.05 TOTALS MATCH Distribution Total:15,644.05 Net Total:15,644.05 oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE. JAN 19. 1993. 9:02 CHECK NO CHECK DATE 1993/01/25 pag* 1 CHECK AMOUNT 26984 <*> 26985 <• > 26986 <• > 26987 < • > 26988 <*> 26989 <•> 26990 <•> 26991 <• > 26992 <• > 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/2S $40.00 $40.00* $978.10 $103,469.62 $104,447.72* $39.17 $39.17* $40.00 $40.00* $1,991.00 $1,991.00* $354.89 $354.89* $89.46 $42.44 $131.90* $16,412.01 $16,412.01* $201.46 $201 46* VENDOR OESCRIPTir>N ACCOUNT PONUMBER M4NII, DUES SULLIVAN/FRITZLER 0:.75-4380 000255 OH AMERICAN NATL BANK AMERICAN NATL BANK TRUST INDENTURE FEE HRA BOND INTEREST 0911-4630 0911-4620 PSl-020 PSl-020 OH OH ARMOR LOCK KEYS 0249-4232 042671 OH ASSC TRAINING OFFICERS OF DUES SULLIVAN/CHESWICK 0129-4380 000254 OH ASSN METRO MUNICIPS 93 DUES 0020-4380 000299 OH BLUMBERG COMMUNICATIONS OH PROJECTION SCREEN 0481-4540 IM00072 OH BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING PRINT PERMIT LABELS SUPPLIES 0174-4322 0129-4210 33937 34273 OH OH CITY OF MOUND 1ST OTR FIRE 0132-431)000270 OH COLE PUBLICATIONS DIRECTORY 0129-4240 000256 OH] 26993 <• > 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 $16.99 $32.05 $59.78 $6.90 $20.19 $1.95 $2.02 $2.63 $0.85 $7.00 $150 45* COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GR.” COMMERCIAL LIFF/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFL/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/OPP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP c^ercial life/grp COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS 0039-4152 0069-4152 0129-4152 017!-4152 0249-4152 9001-1298 0549-4152 0569-4152 0590-4152 0129-4152 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OHIort 26994 <■» 1993/01/25 $25.00 $25.00*DAVID GOMAN notary REG 0129-4383 000259 OH A 26995 <•> 1993/01/25 $94 99 $94.99*EARL F ANDERSON ASSC SIGNS 0249-4233 00121445 OH { 26996 <*> 1993/01/25 $177.96 $177.96*HACH CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS 0549-4234 183376 OH \ 26997 <• > 1993/01/25 $120.00 $120 00*HENNEPIN CNTY CHIEF POLIC DUES sullivan/cheswick/fr 0129-4380 000260 OH 9 26998 1993/01/25 $200 00 INTL ASSOC CHIEFS OF POLl DUES SULLIVAN/CHESWICK 0129-4380 000261 OH g u • V ) 1 ■J .» * •COUNCIL CHECK NC oCHECK REGISTER TUE. JAN 19. 1993. 9:02 PMt CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ■ )DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL <•>S200.00* 26099 <•> 1303/01/25 $50.on $50.UO* HEMA TREASURER DUES SULLIVAN/FRIZLER 0175-4380 000262 OH 27000 1993/01/25 $479.93 MIDWEST BSNS PROD MAP STANDS 0249-4540 435267 OH 1993/01/25 $40.10 MIDWEST BSNS PROD SUPPLIES 0249-4210 435267 OH 1993/01/25 $40.23 MIDWEST BSNS PROD SUPPLIES 0129-4210 435267 OH 1993/01/25 $90.56 MIDWEST BSNS PROD SUPPllES 0039-4210 435267 OH 1993/01/25 $18.72 MIDWEST BSNS PROD SUPPLIES 0059-4210 435267 OH M-1993/01/25 $18.73 MIDWEST BSNS PROD SUPPLIES 0174-4210 435267 OH <•> 1993/01/25 $18.72 $706.09* MIDWEST FSNS PROD SUPPLIES 0069-4210 435267 OH 27001 <•> 1993/01/25 $175.00 $175.00* MILE SEMINAR ERICKSON 0129-4356 000264 OH 27002 <•> 1993/01/25 $375.00 $375.00* MINMSOTA CLE SEMINAR FISCHENICH/ENGLIS 0129-4356 000263 OH 27003 <•> 1993/01/25 $35.00 $35.00* MINNETONKA SPORTSMAN DUES 0129-4380 000265 OH 27004 <•> 1903/01/25 47.500.00 $7,500.00* MI WNETONKA 1ST OTR LEGAL 0080-4302 000269 OH 2700S <• > 1993/01/25 $220.00 $220.00* MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSOC DUES SULLIVAN/CHESWIC/FRI 0129-4380 000271 OH 27006 <•> 1993/01/25 $218.96 $214.96* MOROWCZYNSKI/JAMES UNIFORMS 0129-4221 000268 OH 2700*^ <• > 1993/01/25 $25.00 $25.00* MOSTCA DvES/WECKMAN 0174-4380 000266 OH 270CS <•> 1993/01/25 $10.00 $10.00* MUNICI-PALS DUES 0039-4380 000267 OH 27009 1993/01/25 $115.00 NAAB/THFRESA 1/4 MTG 0290-4306 000300 OH 1993/01/25 $115.00 NAAB/THERESA 1/19 MTG 0174-4306 000300 OH <*> 1993/01/25 $230.00 $460.00* NAAB/THERESA 1/4 & 1/11 MTG 0039-4306 000?Cu OH 27010 <•> 1993/01/25 $21 SO $21.50* POSTMASTER PO BOX RENTAL 186 0129-4321 000301 OH 27011 <• > 1993/01/25 $18.42 $18.42* R C INDENTIFICATIONS SUPPLIES 0129-4210 15391 OH 27012 <« > 1993/01/25 $24.95 $24.95* RICK KARNITZ SUPPLIES 0129-4210 000298 OH 77013 1993/01/25 $49.32 RITZ CAMERA FILM DEVELOP 0129-4210 3769795 OH 1993/01/25 O $31.74 RITZ CAMERA FILM DEVELOP 0174-4210 3769944 OH J Plflt 2 (>oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JAN IS. Idd3. 9:02 PM P»9« 3ACCOUNT)iCCK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION NUMBER INVOICE NO NUMBER MANUAL <•>S81.08- 27014 1993/01/25 $5,840.00 ROLF E ERICKSON FEB FEE 0059-4307 000258 OH <•> 1993/01/25 $17.74 $5,857.74* ROLF E ERICKSON SUPPLIES 0059-4210 000258 OH 27015 <•> 1993/01/25 $1,792.40 $1,792.40* ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 9001-1260 000272 OH 27016 <■> 1993/01/25 $105.00 $105.00* STRETCHERS REPAIR 0129-4342 55551.1 OH 27017 1993/01/25 $21.86 STRINGER bus SYSTM FAX PAPER 0039-4210 155946 OH 1993/01/25 $21.85 STRINGER BUS SYSTM FAX PAPER 0069-4210 155946 OH 1993/01/25 $21.85 STRINGER BUS SYSTM FAX PAPER 0174-4210 155946 OH 1993/01/25 $21.85 STRINGER BUS SYSTM FAX PAPER 0249-4210 155946 OH 1993/01/25 $21.85 STRINGER BUS SYSTM FAX PAPER 0549-4210 155946 OH <•> 1993/01/25 $21.85 $131.11- STRINGER BUS SYSTM FAX PAPER 0569-4210 155946 OH 27011 <•> 1993/01/25 $168.34 $168.34* TELEPHONE SPECIALIST FEB 0099-4340 28746 OH 27010 1993/01/25 $750.83 TOWN & COUNTRY JAN CLEANING 0099-4349 000273 OH 1993/01/25 $213.00 TOWN & COUNTRY JAN cleaning 0129-4349 000273 OH <■> 1993/01/25 $95.35 $1,059.18* TOWN & COUNTRY SUPPLIES 0099-4343 000273 OH 27020 <•> 1993/01/25 $290.85 $290.85* TRACY OIL CO FUEL OIL 0590-4324 17091 OH 27021 <•> 1993/01/25 $228.00 $228.OC* U OF MINNESOTA CLASS VANG/OMAN 0174-4356 000274 OH 27022 1993/01/25 $1.171 50 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UXIFORMC PATCHES 0129-4221 388522 OH 1993/01/25 $74.55 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED U»IFORM PATCHES 0129-4221 388524 OH 1993/01/25 $48 93 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED TE LC®H0NE 0129-4320 00027'OH 1993/01/25 $31.55 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED TELEPhDNE 0249-4320 000275 OH 1993/01/25 $53.78 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED TELEPHOKF 0549-4320 000275 OH 1993/01/25 $29.19 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED DMA PROC 0'*69-4355 000275 OH 1993/01/25 $23.88 UNIFORMS UNIIMITED DATA PROC 0549-4355 000275 OH <• > 1993/01/25 $35.38 $1,468.76* UNIFORMS UNLIMITED DATA PROC 0569-4355 000275 OH 27023 <• > 1993/01/25 $58 55 $58.55* $145,508.36* WESTONKA GLASS SERVICE REPAIR WINDOWS 0590-4343 000276 OH ■F •J 1 &COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. JAN 20. 1993. 8;50 PM <ECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNl VENDOR Ipagt 1 DESCRIPTION DUES SULLIVAN/FRITZLER ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICt NO NUMBER 0175-4380 000255 OH 0911-4630 PSl-020 OH0911-4620 PSl-020 OH 0249-4232 042'j71 OH 0129-4380 000254 OH 0020-4380 000299 OH 0481-4540 IM00072 OH 0174-4322 33937 OH0129-4210 34273 OH 0132-4317 000270 OH 0129-4240 000256 OH <•> S40.00 $40.00* 269L5 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 $978.10 $103,469.62 $104,447.72* 26986 <•> 1993/01/25 $39.17 $39.17* 26987 <•> 1993/01/25 $40 00 $40.00* 26988 1993/01/25 .$1,991.00 $1,991.00* <:•>• 1993/01/25 $354.89 $354.89* 2^990 <•> 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 $89.46 $42.44 $131.90* 26691 <»> 1993/01/25 $16,412 $16.412..I* 26992 < • > 1993/01/25 $201.46 $201.46* 26993 <•> 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/?'’ 1993/01/25 1991/01/25 1993/01/25 $16.99 $32.05 $59.78 $6.99 $20.19 $1.95 $2 02 $2.6j $0.85 $7 00 8150.45* 26994 <• > 1993/01/25 $25.00 $25.00* 26995 <• > 1993/01/25 $94.99 $94 99* 28696 <•> 1693/01/25 $177.96 $177 96* 28S97 <•> 1993/01/25 $120.00 $120.00* :e99s 1993/01/25 $200 00 AHEM II AMERICAN NATL BANK AMERICAN NATL BANK TRUST INDENTURE FEE HRA BOND INTEREST ARMOR LOCK KEYS ASSC TRAINING OFFICERS OF DUES SULLIVAN/CHESWICK ASSN METRO MIJNTCIPG 93 DUES BLUMBERQ COmJNICATIONS OH PROJECTION SCREEN BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING PRINT PERMIT LABELS SUPPLIES CITY OF MOUND COLE PUBLICATIONS 1ST OTR FIRE DIRECTORY COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL commercial COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS JAN INS 0039 0069 0129 0174 0249 9001 0549 0569 0590 0129 -4152 -4152 -4152 -4152 -4152 -1298 -4152 -4152 •4152 -4152 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 000257 DAVID GOMAN EARL F ANDERSON ASSC HACH CHEMICAL CO NOTARY REG SIGNS 0129-4383 000259 0249-4233 00121445 0549-4234 183376CHEMICALS HENNEPIN CNTY CHIEF POLIC DUES SULLIVAN/CHtbWlCK/FR 0129-4380 000280 INTL ASSOC CHIEFS OF POLI DUES SULLIVAN/CHESWICK 0129-4'10 000261 OH OH OH OH OH OH OtJ OHOH OH OK OH OH OH OH * V » 4 M COUNCIL. CHECK REGISTER WED. JAN 20, 1993. 8:50 PM;heck no CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR<•>$200.00*26999<*>1993/01/25 950.00950.00*HEHA TREASURER 27000 1993/01/25 9479.93 MIDWEST BSNS PROD1993/01/25 $40.10 MIDWEST BSNS PROD 1993/01/25 $40.23 MIDWEST BSNS PROD1993/01/25 $90.56 MIDWEST BSNS PROD1993/01/25 918.72 MIDWEST BSNS PROD>1993/01/25 918.73 MIDWEST BSNS PROD €•> 1S93/01/25 918.72 9706 99* MIDWEST BSNS PROD 27001 <■> 1993/01/25 9175 00 9175.00* MILE 27002 <•: 1993/01/25 9375.00 9375.00* MINNESOTA CL£ 27003 <• > 1993/01/25 $35.00 935.00* MINNETONKA SPORTSMAN 27004 <* > 1993/01/25 97.500.00 97.500.00* MINNETONKA 27005 <•> 1993/01/25 9220 00 $220...J* MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSOC 27008 <•> 1993/01/25 9218.96 $218.96*MOROWCZYNSKI/JAMES 27007 <»> l993/01/;5 925 00 925.00* HOSTCA 27004 <»> 1993/01/25 910 00 910.00* MUNICI-PALS 27009 1993/01/25 ^'•115.00 NAAB/THERESA1993/01/25 $115.00 NAAB/THERESA <•> 1993/01/25 $230 00 9460.00* NAAB/THERESA 27010 < • > 1993/01/25 $21.50 $’1.50* POSTMASTER 27011 <• / 1993/01/25 $14.42 $14.42*R C INOENTIFICATIONS 27012 <•> 1993/01/25 $24 95 924 <»5* RICK KARNITZ 27013 1913/01/25 $49 32 RITZ CAMERA 1993/01/25 931 74 RITZ CAMERA 0 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER 0MANUALDUES SULLIVAN/FRIZLER 0175-4380 000262 OH MAP STANDS 0249-4540 435267 OHSUPPLIES0249-4210 435267 OHSUPPLIES0129-4210 435287 OHSUPPLIES0039-4210 435267 OHSUPPLIES0059-4210 435267 OHSUPPLIES0174-4210 435267 OHSUPPLIES0069-4210 435267 OH SEMINAR ERICKSON 0129-4356 000264 OH SEMINAR FiSCHENICH/ENGLIS 0129-4356 000263 OH DUES 0129-AasO 0002FS OH 1ST OTR LEGAL 0C80-4302 000269 OH DUES SULLIVAN/CHESWIC/FRI 0129-4380 000271 OH UNIFORMS 0129*4221 000268 OH OUES/WECKMAN 0174-4380 000266 DUES 0039-4380 000267 OH 1/4 MTG 0290-4306 000300 OH1/19 MTG 0174-4306 000300 CHI1/4 4. 1/11 MTG 0039-4306 000300 Ohj PO BOX RENTAL 486 0129-4321 000301 OHi SUPPLIES 0129-4210 15391 cm SUPPLIES 0129-4210 000298 OH FILM DEVELOP 0129 -4210 3769795 CMFILM DEVELOP 0174-4210 376994#OH ptge 2 fm o DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUFEE- FEE 0059-4307 000258 OHSUPPLIES0059-42.10 000258 OHGASOLINE9001-1260 000272 CHREPAIR0129-4342 55551.1 OHFAX PAPER 0039-4210 155946 OHFAX PAPER 0069-4210 155946 OHFAX PAPER 0174-4210 155946 OHFAX PAPER 0249-4210 .155946 OHFAX PAPER 0549-4210 155946 OHFAX PAPER 0569-4210 155946 OHFEB0099-4340 28746 OHJAN CLEANING 0099-4349 000273 OHJAN Cl.EANING 0129-4349 00C273 OHSUPPLIES0099-4343 000.273 OH FUEL OIL 0590-4324 17091 OH CLASS VANQ/OMAN 0174-4356 000274 OH UNIFORML PATCHES 0129-4221 388522 OH UNIFORM PATCHES 0129-4221 388524 OH TELEPHONE 0129-4320 000275 OHTELEPHONE0249-4320 000275 OHTELEPHONE0549-4320 000275 OHDATA PROC 0069-4355 000275 OHt DATA PROC 0549-4355 000275 OHIDATA PROC 0569-4355 000275 OH REPAIR WINDOWS 0590-4343 000276 QM RENTAL 0549-4331 000271 OH RELOCATE CC RECORDING F(3U 04S1-4540 1735/8738 OHINTSTALL NEW MIC JACKS 04S1-4540 8735/8736 OH riHiiiifiMlIiIfiWilt fSI.1 rtWiIiTMIi •Ill'll riTiIiKift •HI.* [•kT.k *Krii lECK NO27081<•>I993/01/25 $665.75$665.75*FIRST TRUST CO INC27062<»>1993/01/251993/01/25 $150.00$820.00$970.00*FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY27063<•>1993/01/251993/01/251993/01/25 $2: . 85 $25.30 $225.43 $272.58*GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARIS CO27064<•>1993/01/251993/01/25 ri4.238.00$26,442.00$40,680.00*GEPHARDT ELECTRIC GEPHARDT ELECTRIC27065<->1993/01/251993/01/25 $735.00$30,464.00$31,199.00*GOEBEL FIXTURE CO GOEBEL FIXTURE CO27068<«>1993/01/251993/01/251993/01/25 $192.50$39.00$58.50$290.00*GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL27067 <•> 1993/01/25 $83.13$83.13*HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT 27068 <*> 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 1993/01/25 $3,296.70 $3,312.00 $8,361.90 $14,970.60* HOFFERS INC MINNESOTA HOFFER’S INC MINNESOTA HOFFER'S INC MINNESOTA 27069 <• > 1993/01/25 $43,265.00 $43,285.00* HORIZONS INC 27070 <•> 1993/01/25 $2,155.50 $2,155.50* JANSCO CAULKING 27071 <•> 1993/01/25 $2,341.50 $2,341.50* JET TRANSFER INC 27072 <• > 1993/01/25 $7,609.78 $7,609.76* KRAUS ANDERSON CONST 27073 <*> 1993/01/25 $70.00/.90 $20,007.90* LA FORCE HARDWARE/MFG CO 27074 <•> 1993/01/25 $206.86 $206.86* LONG LAKE GLASS 27075 <• > 1993/01/25 $45.37 $45.37* LONG LK FORD TRACTOR iCCOUNTlUMBEK INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL0I-4S30 000283 OHI99-4343 58066 OH80-4520 58066 OH49-4234 000214 OHt29-4232 000284 OHI49-4232 000284 OH84-4520 16350 OH80-4520 16350 OH84-4520 000304 OH80-4520 000304 OH99-4324 2100510 OH49-4306 2120513 OH69-4306 2120513 OH29-4342 0002CS OH•4-4520 000308 OH83-4520 000308 OH50-4520 000308 OH 27-4306 2504 OH 14-4520 0CQ3Q6 • ; •«.OH 12-4520 123192 OH 10-4399 F287TI OH 10-4520 00030?OH 19-434:15405 m li-4232 li032i OH iIiMiIikScIi •Miiiicicrii•l:Hiiwilil•TiWiTil •Hilil •IiM; •nr Ml IMIII iMiIili :OUNT•BEK-4303-4303-4?03-4303-4303-4303-4303-4303-4303■4303•4303 INVOICE NO355675 355675 355875 355675 355675 355675 355675 355675 355675 355675 355675 ?0NUMBER MANUAL•4342 0003154520 00030242324241422143424342456042210002950002950002950002950002950002950002951520 0003111340 27670520 000305 520 000305 520 000305 520 000305 520 000312 344 23245 131 (H)420S2 !40 U00298 '20 000267 I -4 i.i #E' t,r:x ■•r-. .•ij i:: «•i%^ 1 tu ___^ i COUNCIL MEETIN JAN 2 5 1993 CITYOFORONO "f TO:Mayor and City Council FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:January 21, 1993 SUBJECT: City Facilities Fuel System Cancellation Costs Attachment:A. Initial Listing of Cancellation Costs Related to the Underground Fuel Storage System Dated 10/28/92 B. Updated Listing of Cancellation Costs Dated 12/8/9 2 C. Letter From Pump and Meter Service, Inc. Dated 12/14/92 Proposing a 50% Reduction In che Cancellation Costs Si?;;:; •“ f -'-■prvic** Inc then proposed to reduce the remaining cancellation cosrby' 50% for a totaf of $2,182. I have advised Pump and Meter Service that the Council approved their above ground tctnk propos on the condition that the cancellation costs be eliminated. Pumo and Meter Service, Inc. has indicated they have a significant amoSn? of tiL and expense invested in the under ground tank nroiect and they need to recover a portion of those costs. Although Pump and Meter has incurred some expenses they also wete auowef to Lbmrt a proposal for an above ground w^^hout having to compete with other vendors. It is difficult to determine whether their profit margin on sufficient to cover the costs incurred on the below ground fuel system. If the city believes the price for the aboveground syscem i® f oL it is reasonable to pay some portion of the However the citv should not pay for costs not directly oTrll.6 costs. A ov«\ta*l co«^!breakdown, and assuming 35% of the nouriy races is as follows: Drafting time 10 hours • $32.50/hour $ Engineering service 0 hours • $65.00/hour ^30!So Permit tees 10.00 AdminiHtrati«^overhead *10 hours • $26.65/hour Material restocking TOTAL $1,715.00 J The compromise proposal would involve the city paying 50% of the $1,715.00 amount which would be $857.50. ♦ 10 hours of administrative overhead time is included for time spent after the purchase order was issued both to order the tanks and equipment and then to cancel the tanks and equipment. This also included time spent working with the vendors to eliminate the restocking charges. ** The material restocking fee will be included only if this was D uh rui\ ■•i* y/ Pumfi emd SKR\ I( K SAI KS I VSTAI I. vrioN 7 11303 EXCELSIOR BLVD. HOPKINS. MN 55343 (612) 933 4800 FAX (6121 939 0418 December i4, i992 ^CJC r;-:; •* ^ k—J lj\y L'V. '** * w Jb>W DEC i 'e 53®' City of Orono fittnt Mr Ron Morris P O Box 66 Crystml Bay, Minn 5535? Ret Proposal HBQ0& Dear Ron, Please review our proposal i/6303 on the above ground storage tank project. "he $51,129. 75 includes the 6000 gallon above ground tank stated in our letter of December 1,1992 and the concrete fuel pad option in our letter of November 13, 1992. PI so, enclosed is the cancellation costs for the underground storage tank system as discussed, totaling $4,364.00. If the City of Orono accepts proposal i/6303, upon successful completion of the above ground project, Pump and Meter Service »*i 11 deduct 50% off the $43"4.00. The City of Orono txill be responsible for $2132.00 for costs incurred that can not be recapped, due to the cancellation of you>^ previous purchase orders 416590 and 16614. Ue loot* forward to x/orking on this project xiith you. Sincerely, PUMP 4 METER SERVICE, INC. Mike Hemly (/ t ine Tx%ti»0 Twi Tr trine fueting Systems - Elertnmtc Gaugiru d nCf Inventory Controb — Flberglasy Tanks A npe Self-Serv Lquioment Auto Lifts A nrts CanJ CimnrJ SMirmt Compressors Service Stattum himmt Cmm^ties Pumfi tmd 9hc.SKR. (K • SALES • INST.U.LAnON 11303 EXCELSIOR BLVD. HOPKINS. MN 55343 (612) 933 4800 FAX (6I?> 939 C418 / 0^ Decrmbtr 6, 199S r City of Orono P O Boh 66 Cr'ystsl B0yf Minn 55353 Gentlement Please review the fallowing breakdown costa that have been incurred^ due to the cancellation of the U.S.T. sy%tem. -Drafting time ~ 10 Mrs 0 t50. 00/Hr,.......... . $ 500, 00 -Engineering Service - B Hrs 0 1100. 00/Hr, ... . , 600,00 -Perait Fres. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 30,00 -Drafting Supplies (Blueprints). . . . . ... . . . . .10.00 -Hdeinistrat1ve Overhead - 60 Hrs 0 141, 00/Hr,,,,. $S460, 0O -Material Restocking - §3760,00 X .15........ . . .$ 564, 00 Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .§4364. 00 Invoice to follow* by December 31st, Sincere!y, PUMP i METER SERVICE^ INC, Mike Healy ^ CC Ron Morri s John Davies John Rail Fueling Svitem^ - Flertnmk Caugiw d Dliri SetfSery Equipment ~ CurntHtaon tneentoty Omtnili - Fiberghu Tanks d Hpe lift If Auto U/ti d Fam - Sendee Station FuatBS t _ T/mb OrW Om’fri/— Conneiei * J • % C i % • ^ f •****'•i .. . .u • •♦•»— •» I•*• • •' - ' ^ M « • • • • ^ • •» • • • - ^ • . .• • • • • • / pH*HfX ajtd SsSdUcs, % \*k\- > *• iPIIWPv^ \C'' CXLot^O PoAf.ti '' brand fax transmittal memo 7671 • oip»n** * j From Tii).Co. 0«»pt.^hon» • Fa* *Tax 0 11JU5 tA'Ctuaiun U lvu . hcJPKINi. mis 55343 (612) 933 4«U0 MX (612) 939 CM]8 I o /j-O /‘fZ' / &i)w4 i <? t^e i ' 1. \ ^ «./( € 4^v) '/'/l < / I O «*-? j Cj Jpr < fv-fc t/o n-7 jC^ /f-^ccx.rred ^ Shoaid pr o^&c.V {>!? 4~e ^uu \ ^ \ j^<) fro^ Ci^ Or <sO|00 . ^ p njsd^OcAi^ • — ~3?r o>-^ ^ 'Ti 1^ < — fo Uf-^ (0D /^ iS - SS'^^Z. ^ f* iT» Ss^'^\Cc s c» voo/'ifc-' — " <30. »o 1^ znj (O - o^/A^re P<rrA‘->4* **^<“<'> ^ 5u-Pp(i€S 3^vt,c ^r# Aj4'5 y (^*^e.r fk(p/%^ (yQ 4tes •f//^ — P‘¥c>o |w^Ad-<rtA'L- 31C>0 y t-. .. m ' (tJ> — /o^90 ^Vl«^ ^i^u.r€. fNt^(«. cdic* fm <!oA“f* i*^c.tj.r'r'e </ \o*^ Pw.«xj7 */»c.c cJ^'^<. r*' - •i\Ai ,3Sj*^Ct.lr € fi^ /X| £,«. fUtt^ •• t €t3f»»^ ^ -I •• ^ p^^ -* »—»»■. TO: FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator I John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director DATE:January 21, 1993 SUBJECT: Claim for Reimbursement 1580 Bohn's Point Road Prior to the reconstruction of Lift Station Number 9 on Bohn's Point Road, the resident at 1580 Bohn's Point Road experienced sewage backup into their home. Also durinc the rehabilitation of Lift Station Number 9 in 1992, the same resident experienced backup of sewage due to temporary pump failure. In each case, the insurance company has paid the claims presented by the resident or their contractors. During the last incident, the resident submitted claims in the amount of $7,440.39. The insurance company reimbursed the resident $6,104.89 leaving a balance unpaid of $1,335.52. The insurance company stated that they cannot reimburse tne balance requested because they do not feel the claims are for damages but improvements that the property owner has h^i built in to minimize the impact of any future backup problem. The property owner is requesting full reimbursement due to the inconvenience, the loss of the use of those lower le^'^els during the time of reconstruction of the lift station as they did not wish to complete the repairs until the reconstruction of the lift station was complete. lYpically this matter would be resolved at this level. However, Mr. Kovacevich feels very strongly that he has had to endure undue hardship in putting up with a great deal of inconvenience and a very undesirable mess during this whole time. Staff also feels that the amount requested of $1,335.52 is a reasonable amount and recommend approval with the understanding that payment would be made conditional upon receiving a signed release. \ #CITYof OKONO Nfriiiclpai Offices Post Office Box 66 Co-stal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 TELEPHONE-473-7357 • FOC-473-0510 APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSIONS Commission Applying For: ] Parks Commission 3 Planning Commission [_J Community Task Force (Name) Name ^ a i ^ I ! ^ J o dy / 5 Address Post Office & Zip Code M ^z rc Telephone (H) -(W) S' ^ y S OO Resident of Orono n years Work Experience: /' / c- r Tf t ' <» )o ^ i"u' ^'f/ d »•-3P vnS Education Z \ » U <- K. .*3 ^ ^ cf~ //^ fW f- 3 Cl *A Af SS £>^__0 ci j ^ s ^ t h 4^ Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): A /V • ■ » ^ c * / \ i 0 /t u •)>» / K / «»/■ 9^ /7!W 4 ** «> U Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission (Please be as specific as possible. Use additional sheet if necessary.) T L .# % ) I V t .>.w X^ / *7 V «* V »•- j , “T^ V # S e,— . ^ t S • / r ^ j -4 rt «> <^ - J -- i 4 z* ^ a w • 5 *• ^ t f I^ / ^4. / A o it> c/* #• ^ «fc cAo K *V-.- <•• » I «/ / » A ^ ft ^+ 4 / I «• ^ •<•tL (f * *v%,IJ what is your view of the role of the Commission? o /f <» u / ^ w. ^ u ’• I J y ^ ^ w y> f u / i I > '•I <f h -9 c, ^ ^ / ft » ,3 ^t •2. 3 f^» • ft-<* ^ «V /* i •5 1 f * c, ^ it^ \ ^ ^ •> y *fP r“ a ^v.. •«'A/1 - n 4 «w ;4 /^ » to* ~ * ) other Comments: (Use this space to include any further information you would like the City Council to consider, or that you feel is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) 1 understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. £><^ Ajo,sf / f 1*1 /? ? O'CONNOR & HANNAN ATTORNCrS AT LAV^ wASHittoTOM oc orricff »u<tc moo »C •«N»»V.VA»*.A AvC "Uf N OC-•9ot< mmf Aoo rtto rAi 4#»« #••• 3SOO IDS CENTER 80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55^03 2254 >6121 341-3800 FAX I6I2I 343-1256 MAOdiO OFfiCC (.A »INC OHAOA m 1 im09i MAOWtO »P4*M ■ O'* J4I BT8 0^441 • Out 14I JB» rAJI lOM ]4I 877-0799 (612) 343-1258 INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM MACINTOSH & COMMER5 January 14, 1993 Thomas J. Barrett, Esq. POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH KAUFMAN LTD. 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South 9th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 RE: Jerome and Lindell/City of Orono Our File No. 54377-1 Dear Mr. Barrett: We were disappointed that you did not attend the January 12, 1993 meeting between our clients, John and Sandy Jerome and Craig and Jennifer Lindell, and John Gerhardson and Mike Gaffron of the City of Oror.o. Therefore, I am writing to set out our understanding of the matter. At the meeting we again stated that the Jeromes and Lindells object to the unauthorized and illegal public use of their property. The Jeromes and Lindells described a large number of nuisance problems associated with this invasion of their privacy and property. We also repeated our position that the city does not have a valid legal claim to a road across the Jerome and Lindell properties. According to Mr. Gerhardson the city's position is summarized in the materials he handed out on the 12th. He interprets the materials to support the city's claim to a road. Our clients do not agree. Review of the materials does not persuade us that the law or the facts favor the city. The meeting focused on finding solutions to the problems being experienced by our clients. The city proposed posting "No Snowmobiling" signs, attempting to limit the use to that by ice fisherman, and increasing police enforcement efforts to maintain security and eliminate nuisances. 35 Vi*4rs of Prxjinsional Lnul Servkes Thomas J. Barrett, Esq. January 14, 1993 Page 2 We said that a better solution is for the city to abandon its claim to the property. The city can rely on the numerous other lake access points that exist close to the Jerome and Lindell properties. These access points can adequately serve the needs of the community, including the few ice fishermen who use Crystal Bay. The city should also explore a limited access across the Hennepin County park located only a few hundred yards west of the Lindell's home. The city and our clients will both research this alternative. In addition, Craig Lindell and Mike Gaffron will •jointly survey the area and identify existing access points. These access points may be sufficient. Mr. Gerhardson said he would discuss the entire matter with you and eventually with the City Council. At this time, we do not have a specific proposal to make to the council. We remind you that our clients delayed taking action to allow for discussion of constructive solutions. However, our clients face an immediace problem. They will not wait much longer. Therefore, please call me at your earliest convenience to discuss a resolution of this dispute. We look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, O'CONNOR & HANNAN cc:John Gerhardson Michael Gaffron Ronald Morse Mayor Ed Callahan John D. and Sandy Jerome Craig A. and Jennifer Lindell Robert J. Tennessen, Esq. IPB2/ltr/orono J i lJ (L VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA mwnesota 5905 GokJen V*u«y Rc*<J • M r>r#aoo''S MN 55-*22 • (512)545- ’242 January 14, 1993 The Honorable Ed Callahan Mayor of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Callahan: The Volunteers of America has been serving others for 97 years. Volunteers of America Weel', March 7-14, commemorates the founding of our organization on March it, 1896. We are one of Minnesota’s largest human service organizations. Year after year, more than 90% of every dollar we receive, we spend directly on program services...for the people we serve. I am asking you to proclaim the week In our behalf. Your personal proclamation will be encouraging to those who receive services In Crystal Bay, or Its nearby communities. Through the years, Volunteers of America has demonst;ated It is a dynamic organization keeping pace with the everchanging world around it. Now more than ever, ’ve recognize the constant need for developing new and more creative ways In solving problems, meeting community needs, and improving the overall quality ot life for all members of our society. We must continue forming partnerships, bridging the gap between human needs and t.he resources of the public and private sector. Something wonderful Is happening in Minnesota, because of you! Your interest and support makes a significant impact on the success of our organization. And, as you know, our success is measured through the lives of those we touch. Respectfully yours, .31 ^ y/L.n (James E. Hogie, Jr. y President JEH'dc Enclosures P. S. Your proclamation, along with other proclamations and letters, wHt be duplicated and put into booklet form. A booklet commemorating our 97th birthday will be placed In the reception area of each of our programs and senior dining sites. SAMPLE PROCLAMATION VOLUM’EERS OI AMERICA WEEK MarcJi 7-14, 1993 WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, a Christian human service orpaiiization, is celebrnlin:’ its 97th year of service to the people of Minnesota and the nation; it is therefore certainly appropriate for us, the City of C ITY NAME , t j join in the observance of tliis milestone >vit!i the commemoration of March 7-14, 1993 as Volunteers of America Week; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is making a valuable contribution by providing these services to adults and the elderly: 5 homes for mentally disabled, mentally ill, chemically dependent and/or elderly adults; congregate dining for seniors at 45 sites in Anoka and Hennepin Counties; home delivered meals for persons 60 years of age and over; semi independent living services and supported living services: 3 housing complexes for families, the handicapped, and the elderly; and 4 long-term health care facilities; and, WllEREVS, the Volunteers of America provides these services for children and youth; 6 programs serving autistic, autistic-like, and/or development-ally disabled children and youth; a children’s emergency shelter; in-home services; 59 foster treatment homes and correction group homes; a residential treatment center for emotionally handicapped boys; a specialized behavioral program for boys with severe problems: short-term after care for youth with special needs; and, WHERE\S, the Volunteers of America provides 2 correctional services: a pn.‘-release and work- release correctional program serving men; and a women’s Jail, workhouse and work-release correctional program; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, through its dedicated staff and volunteers and the many people who help support their work through financial contribudons make a significant impact on the lives of people in CITY SAME ', and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is commemorating its founding in 1896 and urges others to join tliern in bridging the gap between human needs and the resources of the public and private sector; NOW, THERE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, MA YORS FULL Mayor of the City of QIX MAME . do herebv proclaim the week of March 7-14, 1993, as VOLL'NTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IN CITl ’NAME AND, BE FT RESOLVED, that copies of this priK-lamation be transmit ed to the Volunteers of America as evidence of our esteem. IN WITNESS WHEREOE', I have hereunto vet my Inind and caused the Great Seal of the City of CITY S'{.ME to be .iffived this____day of________________in the year of our Lord one itioiisami iiMie hundred and uiiiety three. M A V O R Volunteers of America Minnesota 1992-1993 PROGRAM SERVICES ADULT SERVICES PROGRAM offers board and lodging homes for seniors, developmentally disabled, mentally ill, cnd/or chemically dependent adults. Telephone 1-495-3344 BAR-NONE RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT CENTER provides services to boys who are emotlonaUy and/or behaviorally disturbed. Telephone: 753-2500 CH1U)RENS EMERGENCY SISLTER offers social and educational services in a protective environment to children in crisis. Telephone: 753-2319 CORRECTION GROUP HOMES offer a struc tured therapeutic home environment for teenagers with a delinquent history. Telephone 546-3242 FOS'FER TREATMENr HOMES proside a supportise, directive environment for behavior- ally disturbed children and youth. Telephone: 546-3242 HOME DELIVERED MEALS hot noon ttieals are delivered to shut-in seniors who are unable to prepare their own meals. Telephone: 546-3242 IN-HOME FAMILY TREATMENT SER VICES strengthens a family's ability to Junction and to resolve problems. Telephone: 546-3242 WINCETON HOME is a home for mentally disabled adults. Telephone: J-495-3344 REGIONAL CORRECTIONS CENTER is a Jail, woridiouse and work-release program for womett. Telephorie: 4XH-2073 RESIDENTIAL CENTER is a pre-release and work-release correctional program for men. Telephone: 721-6327 RESPITE CARE for families of children who are handicapped with autism, autistic-like and/or deselopme ital disabilities. Telephone: 546-3242 SE.>U-1NDEPENDENT LFVLNG SERVICES provide learning opportunities for ituiividuals with special needs. Telephone: J-495-3344 SENIOR DINING PROGRAM serses hot noon meals at 45 community locations to anyone 60 years of age or older. Telephone: 546-3242 SEITEVIG HOME is a home for des-elopmen- tally disabled adults. Telephone: 1-495-3344 SETTEVIG TREATMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NE^S provides intensive treatment services for autistic, autistic-like and developmentally disabled children. Telephone: 753-2500 SHORT-TERM AfTERCARE;jrrp<ir« a child for a successful transition from treatment to home and community. Telephone: 753-2500 SPECULIZED BEHAVIORAL PROGRAM for boys with severe behavioral problems re quiring secure supervision. Telephone: 753-2500 STEVENCROFT residential care offering life copit g skills training for deveiopmentally disab led young adults. Telephone 644-2514 SUPPORTED LIVING SEBMCES PRO GRAMS are provided for developmentally dis abled adolescents and ^ults with special needs. Telephone: 1-495-3344 VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA . . • was founded March 8, 1896 in New York City. Less than four months later services were begun in Minneapolis. VOLUNTEEIRS OF AAIERICA, a national Christian human service organiz^ition, has a 97 year history of serving people in need; regardU'ss of their race, color or creed. It seeks to develop programs in areas where human needs are not being met by exisiing services. VOLliN lTsERS OF AMERICA staff is comprised of individuals who not only have administrative and/or professional social work expertise, but who also have a commitment to the Christian mission of the organization; the reaching and uplifting of all people. Last year, in addition to 340 staff, more than 2100 persons volunteered their talents to help enrich program services in Minnesota. VOLUNTEEIRS OF AMERICA, a 501(c)(3) organization, is eligible to receive tax deductible donations. VOLUNTEEIRS OF AMElRiCA meets all regulatory standards such as a certified audit, annual report, and Filings with the Charities Division of the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Of Minnesota In Minnesota Mark T. Flaten, Chair James E. Hogie Jr, Fres Mary E. Adams Ronald E. Brit c Katie Erickson Walter W. Faster James W. Feil Gordon M. Ilaga Peter L. Hauser Barbara A. King Ross E. Kramer John S. MacArthur William W'. McDonald W. L)le .Meyer John T. Richter Erliiig W. Kockney William E. Sandvig Claylon W. Strandlie Renee J. Tait Robert VanValkenburg Dr. Hann A. Weber Mary E. Adams, Chair James E. Hogie Jr, Pres Jack L. Dignum Robert E. Nolte Jr Eldward Settevig Eklward C. Spefh:u:inn VOLUNT EERS OF A.ME:RICA MINNEISOTA DISTRICT OFFICE administrative, accounting, and development offices arc located at 5905 Golden Valley Road, MinoeapoIU, MN 55422-4490 (612) 546-3242 OFFICIAL COMMUNICATION FROM THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA ARNE H. CARLSON GOVERNOR EMBARGOED EMBARGOED UNTIL 7:00 PM JANUARY 14,1993 JOANELL M. DYRSTAD EMBARGOED GOVERNOR CONTACT: Cvndy Bnicato 290^17 (O) GOVERNOR CARLSON PROPOSES NEW SYSTEM TO SERVE MINNESOTA'S CHILDREN AND YOUTH In his 1993 State of the S ate message, Governor Ame H. Carlson proposed a new, improved and easier to use agency which will provide services to aU Minnesota chil 'ren. from infancy through post secondary education. The new agency will be called the Department of Children and Education Services. It will bri^ together - for the first time - state programs which help children, including education and soual services and will assist young people with the transition from school to work. The new department will implement statewide education sta nda rds and administer a youth apprenticeship training program. The new department will incorporate the functions of the Department of Education and the Higher Education Coordinating Board. Under Governor Carlson's proposal, the Department of Education and the Higher Education Coordinating Board will be eliminated. The proposal will require legislative approvaL The beauty of this proposal is that we not only streamline a bulky government system, we offer a onC'Stop shopping department if you are shopping for services for your children,^ said Governor Carlson. The end result is that every child will have a better chance at success.” The new Department of Children and Education Services vdU coordinate and link inost state children's programs. Currently, Minnesota spends $4J billion on more than 250 childrens programs each year, but these programs are administered through 33 different state departments. The Department of Children and Education Services wUl be the single agency re^nsiblc fm cutting through the bureaucratic web. In addition to this reorganization at the state lewL the Governor will propose in his budget $10 million in new grants for commumtiM which involve agencies schools parents and non-profits in a simila r effort to develop a continuum approach to helping children succeed. The Governor said ihat educators play a key role in helping children win through tl^ new department He proposed that the Department of Education be incorporated into the new Department of Children and Education Services and that educators continue to push for a system that is driven by results. - more - Cyndy Bnjcato Otrector of Cornfmimcatton* drMs Socroiafy Sial* Capitol. SI- Paul. Minnesota SS19S O an tOuAi arm mxjMFTt rimavtA Tony VigiUart Doputy Press Ssers^ (§12) 2ta-7§a» The Governor has proposed that the education division of the new department administer statewide benchmark testing. The testing wiU be administered at the tenth grade level and will require a student to master a rigorous set of academic skills. "No child should slide through high school with a fourth grade reading ability," the Governor said.^ "Students need to pass through a gateway of achievement before they proceed to the next level" The new Department of Children and Education Services will deal with that next level. The department will aggressively create and promote a Minnesota system of youth apprenticeships. The youth apprenticeship system will focus on students who may choose not to go coUege. It will offer them hands-on job training during the last two years of high school combined with continued academic education. "We need a new focus on the young people in this state who decide to leave the education ^tem anH end up with low-sldll low-wage jobs with no future, Governor Carlson ^d. He added that there will be a special emphasis on reaching out to children of color, children of poverty children who learn best in a hands-on environment. A Division of Careei Preparation will manage the youth apprenticeship program. The Governor will allocate $5 million for state and local efforts to plan and design this system. The new Department of Children and Education Services will have several functions: • A Children's Services Division will bring together programs serving children from birth to kindergarten. • A division will be responsible for facilities and finance, standards and assessment and research and other services relating to education and q>ecia] edwcation. • • 16 to 20, offering them a wide range of options ranging from coUege preparation to youth apprenticeship to technical training. A Higher Education Division will focus on student choosing to participate in higher education. The Governor called on young people across Minnesota to take advantage of the new* opportunities which will be created by the Department of Children imd Education Servioea said that learning and learning to win requires their active participation. The state of Minnesou leads the nation in the number of young employed in the work force, with 70 percent of teenagers working an average of 24 hours a week. "Teachers tell me these working students come to school tired and unprepared." the Governor said. That is way too high a price to pay for cars, clothes and CDs." He more - In his State of the State address the Governor proposed legislation to cap the number of hours an individual who has not completed high school can work at 20 hours a week, with exceptions for hardship cases. The Governor said that his proposal to bring new, improved and easier to use services to children and families, a proposal for consistent standards of academic achievement and a plan to give young people more career options through youth apprenticeship constitutes an ambitious agenda. "An ambitious agenda, yes, but there is a sense of urgency," Governor Carlson said. ‘The customer is chsmge. The parent with a toddler who needs pre-school learning help, or a rhiiri in elementary school, or a pre-teen with questions about drugs, or a teenager hying to decide between a job or college shoulo have access to an easy-to-use system that can help," he said. "Our administration is committed to putting our customers first and in Minnesota, children are our number one customer." ## # State of the State Address January 14,1993 •-^1 .................... Governor Arne H. Carlson Lieutenant Governor Joanell M. Dyrstad O ARNE H. CARLSON Governor STATE OF THE STATE ADDRESS EMBARGOED UNTIL 7:00 P.M. January 14, 1993 Madam Speaker, fellow constitutional officers, former governors, members of the Supreme Court, and its newest member, Alan Page; appellate court justices under the new leadership of Paul Anderson; members o" the Minnesota Legislature and especially our 50 new legislators — I want to say tham: you for your commitment to serve. I believe 1993 will be a year when we will be proud to say that we are Minnesotans My optimism is based on the record that we have built togetfier over the past two years: • Today we have a iicalth care system in Minnesota that is accessible and affordable to all hard-working families. We value our beautiful Minnesota environment so much that we protect it through the most comprehensive wetlands laws in the nation. It was our record in the area of water quality that motivated the National Audubon Society to honor our administration with an award for excellence in the environment - the only American elected official to receive this award in the last five years. We learned, and some may say we learned the hard way, that it is too expensive for companies to exist, let alone expand in Minnesota... so we reduced rates for worker’s compentation and reduced the rates for commercial iiidustrial property taxes. We said we’re fed up and we’re not going to take it anymore when it comes to crime. We now have stiffer penalties for a variety of crimes, p>articularly rape. We have put more dollars into violence prevention. And now we are seeking new laws against stalkers. And when it comes down to making those tough choices during the tightest financial times I’ve seen as an elected official, we have protected the funding for our children’s education. We know what matters. And we will close the gap between anticipated revenues and expenditures without a tax increase. This is what happens when we choose to work together. ITiis legislature has earned a reputation for being visionary. When I talk to other governors and hear their stories I am reminded of how fortunate I am to work with a body that time and again shows that it knows how to get things done for the people of Minnesota. We have proven that we can rise above the gridlock. And v.e will do it again. We must fmd the direct route to change and improvement in order to address the challenges that lie ahead. Since becoming governor in 1991,1 have spent a great deal of time listening to Minnesotans describe their concerns, their challenges, and most importantly, what their dreams are for the future. I listened as they talked and I heard Minnesotans say they want three things: • First, people are concerned about getting and keeping good jobs. Those who have lost their jobs are suffering. Those who have had to settle for low-paying jobs are hurting. And those who HAVE good jobs are worried about losing them. All of us can identify with what a job means tc a family. That is why last month I proposed a plan that will help employers, especially small businesses, create more jobs for Minnesotans, the people who I believe are the most productive workers in America. • Second, Minnesotans told me that they want to protect and enhance our very special quality of life - from our pristine natural resources to our exciting diversity of cultural attractions. And fmally, a theme that resonated in every town from Rochester to Roseau as we traveled around the state for Minnesota Milestones: We want tc say to every child, ’You can be anything you want to be.’ We want to sec every child come to school ready to learn, we want families to provide a stable environment for their children, we want all our children to be healthy and we want every young person to gain the skills needed to compete in a global economy. Tonight I want to focus this State of the State speech on the subject I hold closest to my heart — the needs of our children. Two years ago, I appointed a commission to take a hard look at how we serve our children and their families. Under the leadership of Ron James and my wife Susan, the Action for Children Commission has turned out to be an excellent example of the results that can be accomplished through a partnership among businesses, communities, advocates for children and government. In the course of its work, the commission tried to answer two simple questions: First, how much money are we, as a state, spending each year on children? Second, what kinds of results are we getting? The commission identified at least 250 children’s programs, administered through 33 different state agencies, boards and commissions, costing Minnesota taxpayers $4.5 billion dollars a year. Over the years, with the very best of intentions, we have created a tangled, bureaucmtic web of children’s programs. I would guess that not one of us in this chamber can name all of them. We have created too many individual government specialty shops. And we invite our customers to wait in line to see if they might be able to squeeze into the narrow pnxiuct we are selling. If they cannot, they trudge on to the next shop. Families and children who need help are frustrated by the complexity of the system and often do not get the kind of help they nejd. They end up working with dozens of case workers, counselors and eligibility specialists who are connected back to a confusing maze ot inflexible programs. Our children are being divided into pieces by a system that is largely government centered and difficult to use. Ar.d what are the results? Too many of our children are failing. Maybe they aren’t your children or mine, but in every school there are children who are being left behind. And when these young people act out, they affect the way all our children learn. Eventually, we all pay for failed outcomes. Every child deserves our very best. Nowhere is there more hope and potential than in the curious face of a two-year old, and nowhere is there more tragedy than in the angry face of a 13 year-old who cannot adequately read, nor more disappointment than in the face of a 17- year-old who has just been told he has no marketable job skills. We need to give our young people more options. Gwen Marshall from Minneapolis is just one example. Gwen graduated years ago with average grades from North High School. She was married, had a daughter, and was later divorced. As a single parent, she worked full-time during the day and sometimes held evening jobs in retail sales. Eventually the draining routine, the day care payments and being away from her young daughter got to be too much, so she quit her jobs and went on AFDC. To her credit, Gwen enrolled in a skilled trades program at St. Paul Technical College last year, 17 years after she graduated from high school. She will complete the program this summer and someday wants to teach at a high school or a technical college. I have met Gwen, and I am confident she will attain any goal to which she aspires. She is with us this evening. Gvten Marshall in the center balcony. But we have not been fair to the Gwen Marshalls of Minnesota, and there are many of them. Today I would like to prorruse you Gwen that we can and we will give your daughter more career options. Ill my own life, education has meant everything. If it were not for the unique opportunities that 1 had, and the sturdy encouragement I received from my parents, I know this: I would not be here tonight, and I suspect the same is true for most of you. Gwen’s story illustrates that the system that has served most of us and our parents so well for so long is no longer adequate. In Minnesota, we can and must do better. The high-performance employers of today demand high skills from every employee at every level. Employers all over the state are telling me they cannot find the kinds of qualified workers they need. They are frustrated by the widening skills gap. • The results of a recent Trade and Economic Development survey tell us that 70 percent of Minnesota companies report difficulty in recruiting skilled and technical workers. • In a brand new survey of 35 1 Minnesota businesses conducted by the Minnesota Business Partnership, 52 percent of Twin Cities employers believe today’s job applicants lack adequate basic skills in reading, writing and math. Ninety percent said they would like to see Minnesota high school graduates be certified as meeting minimum standards. • Another large Minnesota employer reports that 75 percent of the Minnesota youth applying for jobs with their company cannot pass the company’s basic employment exam. • A manager of one of Minnesota’s most prestigious technology companies told us his company finds better qualified high school graduates in Guadalajara, Mexico, than in Minnesota. That bothers me. We do not have a job shortage in Minnesota — we have a skills shortage. And I fear that this skills shortage will eventually drive high-skills jobs out of the state. This is not the fault of our children. It is not the fault of our teachers or schools or communities. The blame largely rests with a fragmented system that sends out mixed messages to cur children; a system that has not yet recognized that our children will compete in a world economy. Our young people deserve a bigger, better package of education and training possibilities. Smdents need linkages to the rr.pialy changing, increasingly technological world. In Minnesota, we have begun to address some of these problems. We have created, for the first time, a Children’s Cabinet consisting of all the state government department heads whose agencies provide services to children and families. Phis executive level cabinet has taken an inventory of all children’s programs in the state and formulated Minnesota’s first integrated children’s budget. I can assure you tiiat this budget, which reflects the needs of Minnesota’s children, will be my number one priority this session. We will protect our overall spending on children from budget cuts. In other areas too, Minnesota’s leadership on behalf of children is being recognized on the national level. • We are a leading candidate to receive a multi-million dollar grant from a major national foundation to completely reinvent the way we serve families and children. • A team of Minnesota educators will receive up to $14 million from a national fund to design new kinds of schools that will serve as community learning centers for people of all ages. • We are distinctive among all states in our commitment to Head Start. Minnesota is one of only a handful of states that invest in Head Start beyond what the federal government gives us. And we increased our commitment by 30 percent last year. But we need to do more. TONIGHT I AM PROPOSING THE NEXT LOGICAL STEP - TO BRING TOGETHER, FOR THE FIRST TIME, PROGRAMS THAT ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES. What I am proposing tonight is nothing less than an overhaul of our system from top to bottom — an agenda for change, to keep Minnesota in a national leadership position on children and families, and to prepare our young people for the work force of the 21st Century. Our administration is committed to putting our customers first, and in Minnesota, children are our number one customer. It is time we reorganize around the needs of today’s child, to start with the child, and carefully build out from there a complement of services at the local level that makes sense and leads to successful, confident kids. I recognize these proposals are significant, and therefore will not pass without a great deal of controversy and spirited debate. But Representative Wihard Munger told me two years ago, and I quote, "If something isn’t controversial, it’s probably no damn good anyway." I tend to agree with you, Willard. WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING IS TO CREATE A NEW DEPARTMENT - THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND EDUCATION SERVICES. Let me repeat that. We are proposing to create a new department - the Minnesota Department of Children and Education Services - to address the needs of the total child, from infancy through the teenage years. Creating a new department will mean dramatically changing, and in some cases, abolishing, existing agencies. But we cannot let long-standing battles over turf and reverence for institutions stop us from taking meaningful steps for children and their famil'r. What will this mean to children and families who need help? It will mean that for the first time, there will be a single agency responsible for cutting through the bureaucratic tape on behalf of children. It will mean that a single agency head can be held accountable for producing better results. It will mean that families can be more assured of finding and getting comprehensive help in one convenient location. And it will mean that every child will have a better shot at success. Changes are already taking place in Minnesota that reflect this new approach of putting children, not systems, first. This new department will support those community-based efforts. We have learned that some of the most effective programs, such as Head Stan, work best because they involve families in all aspects of the program and they rely on local community involvement. We will use this philosophy throughout the Department of Children and Education Services as we bring in programs in addition to Head Start such as Early Childhood Family Education, Early Childhood Screening, Learning Readiness, Way to Grow, Even Start, the Children’s Trust Fund and a host of others that focus on those critical years in a child’s life from birth to kindergarten enrollment. By reinventing the way we serve these young children, we will begin to make some sense out of a fragmented, disjointed system. ■7I In addition to reorganizing at ihe state level, we will offer incentives to local officials, Community Action agencies, schools, parents and non-profits to forge a new partnership around the needs of children and families. Our budget proposal, which will be unveiled in 12 days, will include $10 million dollars in new grants to be awarded to communities who develop collaborative ways lo help children and responsible families succeed, and who make a commitment to measuring results for children. Because education is such an important part of our children’s lives, we invite educators to join in a dynamic partnership with the whole array of other children’s services. To do this, we will propose that the education services currently provided by the Department of Education be incorporated into the new Department of Children and Education Services. This new department will carry forward the commitment we have made to make our education system one that is driven by results. We have talked about standards in education long enough. It is time to rake action. To set standards. To set them high, and to measure the results. Having serious, measurable standards will assure us that no child will slide through high school without basic skills. These new benchmarks ultimately win bring a more individualized approach to teaching and learning, because once these standards are in place, the state is going to step back and simply send the money and resources educators need to help students achieve this level of competency. No more micro-management. No more state regulations about how many hours of French or geogr:^)hy a child needs. We wiU stop piling on our teachers every social goal that should be delivered by families, churches and other institutions. We are going to let local schools do their jobs. We will free teachers up to teach. Our focus at the state level will only be on outcomes We will ask the Department of Children and Education Services to determine and assess educational standards so that by about the 10th grade, our students will have masteied a rigorous set of academic skills. As students pass through this gateway of achievement, we can be assured that every one of them has the basic skills needed to proceed on to the nezt level. 8 In add;tion to assuring that no child is left behind in their early years, we must begin to address the job training needs of our young adults. Which brings me to the next major part of our proposal this evening, and it has to do with how we prepare our young people for the high-skill, high-wage jobs of tomoriow. I PROPOSE THAT MINNESOTA MOVE AGGRESSIVELY TO CREATE OUR OWN SYSTEM OF YOUTH APPRENTICESHIPS - THAT WE FORGE A NEW PARTNERSHIP WITH BUSINESS, EDUCATION, LABOR AND GO\ ERNMENT THAT WILL WIDEN THE OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE TO OUH YOUNG PEOPLE. I am proposing tonight that we commit to giving our young people more meaningful options while they are in high school - options that wi’l compe them to stay in school, work hard, gain hands-on training in a high-sldll occupation and, a: the end of four years, secure a well paying job. To the 20 percent of Minnesotans who complete a four-year degree, our education system may appear to be working just fine, but 80 percent of Minnesotans never complete such a degree. We need a new focus on the 16- to 20-year-olds who are at risk of leaving the education system without the skills needed lo enter a secure high-wage career. We need to place a special emphasis on reaching out to our at-risk youth — children of color, children in poverty, children who learn best in a hands-on environment, children who now arc falling through the cracks of our system into a future of despair. With a youth apprenticeship program in place, students will have the option of pursuing college preparation courses or a combination of academic classes and hands-on job training during their last two years of high school. Will this kind of learning program trap our kids into making narrow, one-way choices? Absolutely nc* W'U it give all teenagers and young adults more options? You bet. Work-based learning will put a solid floor under a young person’s career. Many will take this experience and go on to a college or university later. That is how it works in Europe. For example, one third of all practicing engineers in Germany went through apprenticeship programs first, and then went on to the university for further education. h This youth apprenticeship program will also be coordinated by the new Department of Chi!d»’en and Ed lion Services. In my budget message later this month I will also propose establishing Education and Training Accounts for every young Minnesotan. For those students whose families are less able to save for training and education, w.' will contribute to their accounts. We will challenge philanthropies, employers i'nJ parents to save through these accounts so that no young person will stand at the threshold of training opportunities without the resources to participate. This new department will serve as a school-to-work bridge for students; linking students with training and linking trained students with good jobs. We recognize that industry, in partnership with labor and educators, is the key to this youth apprenticeship program. For employers who participate, this means finding new resources for training and finding the money in today ’s tough economic climate to pay the wages that students will earn during training. But business will ultimately sec that, long term, this is an investment that brings powerful returns. Honeywell has already stepped forward with an offer to open up 80 apprenticeship spots within their Minnesota facilities. Jim Renier. CEO of Honeywell is with us tonight, and on behalf of all Minnesotans I want to say thank you Jim, for your leadership. Minnesota employers have established a number of meaningful partnerships with local high schools, technical schools and college*... But tonight 1 am calling upon them to do much more. we must also recognize that government alone will never be good at rearing children. Every sector of the community must play a role. Parents, especially, must take in active role. There is only one place where children can learn that they are lovable, capable human beings, and that is at home. It is up to parents to t^h their children the importance of responsibility and the rewards of hard work. r Our young people must come to grips with the fact that learning demands their rigorous participation. It does not occur through osmosis, it is not a spectator sport and it is not free. Minnesota taxpayers are paying more than $...000 per year to educate each student and we expect hard work in return. I want to make sure that students are working hard on their education. It was shocking to me to learn that Minnesota leads the nation in the number of youth employed in the work force, with 69 percent of Minnesota teenagers working an average of 24 hours a week. Teachers tell me that these students come to school tired and unprepared. The 1992 Minnesota Student Survey confirms that grades drop off dramatically for those students who work 20 or more hours per week. This tells us tliat too many young people today are being held back by peer pressure to earn money and by a culture tied to cars, clothes and CDs. We must introduce a new seriousness into the business of learning and communicate that seriousness to our kids. We will propose legislation this month to limit youth who have noi yet completed high school from working more than 20 hours per week during the school year. IN SUMMARY, TONIGHT I HAVE OUTLINED A PROPOSAL THAT WILL BRING TOGETHER THREE DYNAMIC SUPPORT SYSTEMS INTO ONE COHESIVE DEP.^RTMENT FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH. First we will bring together all those critical programs for our youngest children before they enter kindergarten. To this we will add educational programming for elementary and secondary students with an emphasis on setting rigorous academic standards for ail students. 9 And then we will add the third piece, and what is now the missing link, career preparation in the form of youth apprenticeship training for our young adults. This new department will support a seamless, community-based approach to serving young people in Minnesota. It is an ambitious agenda, and 1 look forward to discussing the^- proposals and others with you. But there is a sense of urgency. Our work force is in stiff competition with workers in other countries. Real wages in America have declined in the past 20 years. I know that President-elect Bill Clinton understands these issues very well, because I have worked with him and uie governors of other states to put these issues on the national agenda. I say U night to Presidert-elect Clinton: Minnesota is ready to work with you to lead the nation in making America’s work force the best in the world. What we’re talking about tonight is a new team effort, and every player must pitch in and work hard in order to win - government, business, parents, children, all of us. If we start today and work together, our kids will come out on top. Thank you vc.y much. 12 • • key elements of governor ARNE H. CARLSONS PLAN FOR CHILDREN AND EDUCATION SERVICES State of the State Address - January 14, 1993 A new Department of Children and Education Services will be created, replacing the existing Department of Education and the Higher Education Coordinating Board and incorporating parts of a number of other state agencies. The new department will have several functions: A Children's Services Division will bring together programs serving children from birth to kindergarten eturoUmenL The new department will be responsible for facilities and finance , standards and assessment, and research and other services relating to education and special education. The department will be responsible for setting educational standards and assessments, developing a benchmark assessment for basic academic skills to be taken at about 10th grade, setting high school graduation sta ndards and dev ’eloping alternative learning methods to ensure that all children master basic academic skills. A Career Preparation Division, focusing on yoimg people from about age 16 to 20, offering them apprenticeships to technical training. A Higher Education Division, focusing on students choosing to participate in higher education. In addition, the plan includes: $10 million in new grants, available to communities who develop collaborative ways to help children and families succeed, and who make a commitment to measuring results for Idds. $5 million for state and local efforts to plan and design a ^stem of youth apprenticeships. Establishing Education and Training Accounts to encourage families to save for toeir children's training and education. About $25 million in state funds would be available to <children in low-inc»me families for accounts to finance their future tra ining . Foundation and business contributions also could be used to enhance savings for education and training for all children. Legislation Umiting the numlwr of hours that young pwple can work if they have not yet completed high school. Exceptions would be allowed in cases of financial hardship. Support for the new Higher Education Board and consolidation of the governance boards of the three higher eduerfion systems by 1995. In addition, exi .sting citizen boards will be retained as advisory bodies to the new department THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND EDUCA TION SERVICES Functions of the Children's Services Division: To consolidate and coordinate policies and programs that deal primarily with children from birth to kindergarten enrollment The division also will administer community collaboration grants. Programs to be transferred to the Children's Services division (Note: Programs would be phased in over the course of the biennium): From the Department of Jobs and Training: Head Start From the Department of Education: Early Childhood Family Education (including tribal schools) Early Childhood Screening Early Childhood Special Education and Part H3 Learning Readiness Way to Grow Even Start From the Department of Health: School Health program Home Visitor program * In addition, the new department would provide polity coordination for Lead Screerung, Maternal and Child Health, arid the Women, Infants and Ouldren program. From the Department of Human Services: Child Care Service Development Children's Trust Fund Migrant Child Care Dependent Child Care * In addition, the new department would provide policy leadership and planning for Early Periodic Screening, Diofftosis and Treatment. From the Department of Trade and Economic Development: Community Resource Program Functions of Cacilities and finance, standards and assessment, and research and related services: To coordinate and consolidate education services from kindergarten enrollment through about 10th grade, or successful completion of an assessment of core academic skills. These divisions will be responsible for setting standaids and determining assessment tools, for providing alternative learning opportunities to those students who need additional assistance in reaching basic skill levels, and for providing career guidance and training to young people. Programs to be UmnsferrMl to those functions: From the Department of Education: Kindergarten through 10th grade eduoition services and administration, including special education. Functions of the Career Preparation Division: To aggressively track and forecast employment opportunities and trends, particularly concentrating on high-sldll, high-wage jobs; to provide a clea^ghousc of information for students, parents and employers for career information; to set certification standards and establish credentials for youth apprenticeship programs; to recruit employers, spools, students and parents to participate in youth apprenticeship programs; to place a special emphasis on at-risk students, including communities of color and students in poverty; to coordinate policy, administration and financing of educational services to young people who have mastered basic educational skills to prepare them for post-secondary education and the workplace. Programs to be transferred to the Career Preparation Division: From the Department of Education: Minnesota Career Information System 11th and 12th grade educational services and administration Minnesota Occupational Information Council FnncUons of the Higher Education Division: Management of financial aid programs, support functions, policy analysis, providing a clearinghouse of information for students, parents and employers. Programs to be transferred to the Higher Education Division: Pro^ams and functions of the Higher Education Coordinating Board O^en The Department of Education : 1 the Higher Education Coordinating Board would be abolished, with their functions transferred to the new agency as outlined. The transition would take place over a two-year phase-in period. The reorganization would not affect the merger of the governance boards of the three Ugher education ^tems by 1995. Questions and Answers About Youth Apprenticeship Q. What is youth apprenticeship? A. Minnesota Technology Inc. and its Youth Apprenticeship Steering Committee, which has pioneered planning for youth apprenticeship programs in Minnesota, uses the following definition: A program that integrates academic instruction and work-based learning; provides for worksite learning and paid work experience; is offered to students beginning in about the 11th or 12th grade; is intended to resuh in receipt of a high school diploma and an approved certificate of competency, and lead to entiy into a post-secondaiy program or permanent employment Q* Does school end at 10th grade, once a student has mastered basic skills? A: No. Once the basic academic skills are mastered, educational opportunities will be expanded during the final two years of high school, and beyond. Students will professional or technical courses in broad career fields, a college preparatoiy curriculum, a youth apprenticeship program, or a combination of options. Built-in flexibility will permit students to move back and forth between options leading toward college and the workplace. Students will continue to earn a high school diploma after 12th grade. Q. Will the role of the high school change? A. It depends. Some high schools may choose to offer the same choices they currently offer, in which case, change would be minimal Other high schools could choose to specialize in certain areas: for example, offering intense preparation for i^cca laureat c degree programs, or offering ycuth apprenticeship programs tbat combine learning with on-the-job eiqierience. In addition to high schools, other institutions could offer programs to attract 11th and 12th graders. Businesses or industry groups could set up training academies, either independently or in cooperation with high schools. Community colleges could offer, as technical colleges now offer, programs for high* school-age students. Students could use the Post-Secondary Options Act to college courses or enroll in youth apprenticeship programs. Q* Critics argue that forcing 11th grade students to choose between baccalaureate preparation or work-based learning amounts to a *two-track* system that divides students according to their ability. Is that a valid argument? A. No. Students will have more options than they do now to pursue different irindi of learning experiences. In addition, students who choose one option and then change their minds will be able to choose another career path without penalty. The United States is the only major industrialized country that docs not have a well-defined and implemented school-to-work transition. By offering new opportunities for skilled technological training, often in non-traditional setiings such as the workplace, this initiative reaches out to our most negleaed students — the 50 percent or so who will not go on to college. V. . Q. A. Q. A. Q. Q. A. Q. Whal Is the tariget population for youth apprenticeship? Students ages 16 to 20 who arc interested and could benefit from a structured "hands-on" work-school experience. Special efforts wiU be undertaken to attract young people of color, young women and at-risk youth. Why would employers choose to participate in youth apprenticeship programs? Because it is in their own best interests. Better school-to-work transitions wiU produce the foundation of a highly skilled workforce. Young people who complete youth apprenticeship programs will form a pool of proven, competent trained individu^ from which to choose entry level employees. Also, as youth ^prentices learn on the job, they become productive workers. How will Minnesota finance the costs of planning, designing and implementing youth apprenticeship programs? New funds amounting to $5 million will be provided for planning and designing the system. Financing of instruction that will take place during the youth apprenticeship period will be ^innnaf to that permitted by the Post-Secondary Options Act. Minnesota nicA aggressively pursue federal resources that are ei^iected to become^ available. Finally, Minnesota employers who create youth apprenticeship programs will pay part of the costs through wages paid to the youth i^iprentices. Will this affect existing certified apprenticeship programs for adults? No. Occupations in which certified apprenticeship programs exist will not be among those chosen for youth i^prenticeship. What If a young person enrolled In a youth apprenticeship program, but then changed her mind and decided to go to college instead? Could she make the switch? Yes. Youth apprenticeship experience would be directly transferrable to a baccalaureate program. Likewise, coUege credits could be transferred to youth apprenticeship programs. A I Raft 1 9 '1993 League of Minnesota Cities January 15, 1993 3490 Lexington Avenue North St Paul, MN 55126 (612) 490-5600 UAntr w (ESOW 3 TO: MAYORS, MANAGERS, CLERKS - cities with 5,000 population and edDOve FROM: Ann Higgins, Federal/State Liaison RE: *93 NLC Congressional-City Conference, March 6-9, Washington, D.C. PLBASB BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF CITY OFFICIALS ENCLOSED INFORMATION about the 1993 NLC CONGRESSIONAL-CITY CONFERENCE, TO BE HELD IN WASHINGTON, D.C., MARCH 6-9. DEADLINE FOR ADV7WCB REGISTRATION ^ FEBRUARY 12. IT IS IMPORTANT TO SUBMIT REGISTRATIONS IMMEDIATELY IN ORDER TO OBTAIN YOUR CHOICE OP HOTEL ACCC^IMODATIONS. LMC Delegation Activities BRIEFING: Preparation for Capitol Hill meetings The League will hold a briefing on Monday, March 8, for all city officials attending the conference to prepare for meetings on Capitol Hill with members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation. MEETINGS with Minnesota Congressional Delegation Appointments for meetings with House and Senate members of the congressional delegation will be scheduled on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, March 9, beginning as early as 8:30 a.m., and continuing throughout the day until as late as 4:00 p.m. These meetings represent the major focus of activity for city officials attending the conference. Please take note of this activity in planning your travel schedule. RECEPTION on Capitol Hill The League will also sponsor a reception for city officios and members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation on Capitol Hill on Monday evening, March 8, from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. There will ^ a charge for attending the reception to cover the cost of catering. Travel arrangements: information/assistance Information on airfares and travel agency assistance in planning your trip to Washington, D.C. will be available soon. The League will identify an agency and available discount fares for those attending the conference as a service to cities. Policy Committee Meetings The first meeting of 1993 NLC policy committees will take place on Saturday, March 6, from 1:00 - 4:30 p.m. City officials interested in serving, or continuing to serve, on these coomittees should contact Ann Higgins as soon as possible. (SEE LIST OF CURRENT MEMBERS BELOW.) By the end of January, LMC President Larry Bakken will be appointing city officials to serve on each of the five NLC policy committees for the coming year. Policy coomittees will be establishing priorities for policy development at meetings in March. (Minnesota city officials interested in serving on NLC steering committees have already submitted applications. Those appointments are made by ccomittee chairs. Steering committees examine issues and develop policy recommendations for review by policy committee members and adoption at the NLC Congress of Cities, held at the close of the year (December 2-5, in Orlando, Florida). (Note change in dates!) Current (1992) NLC Policy Committee Members: FAIR (Finance, Administration, & Intergovernmental Relations) Janel Bush, Minneapolis Skip Johnson, Mound LaNelle Olsen, Northfield Don Rcunstad, Maple Grove Robert Stromberg, Brooklyn Park BEIQl (Energy, Environment & Natural Resources) Carol Johnson, Minneapolis Douglas Pearson, Bklyn. Park Robert Pollock, Inver Grove Hts. (2 vacanc3.es) CKD (Community & Economic Development) Sonja Berg, St. Cloud Jackie Cherryhomes, Minneapolis Ruth Crawford, Rochester Dean Masclika, Roseville Mark Voxland, Moorhead Terry Schneider, Minnetonka (alternate) HD (Human Development) Joan Campbell, Minneapolis Sharon Fees, Brooklyn Park Neil Peterson, Bloomington LeAnn Sargent, Maple Grove (one vacancy) TStC (Transportation & Communications) Robert Benke, New Brighton Vernon Johnson, Roseville Bruce Nawrocki, Columbia Heights Mary Petterson, Rochester (one vacancy) 1993 NLC POLICY COMMITTBB wi:ci Name Address Phone(s) 3KRSHIP APPLICATION Title _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zip I wish to serve continue to serve on the 1993 NLC Policy Committee. Return to: Ann HiggiriS, LMC Office, 3490 Lexington Ave. N., St. Paul, MN 55126 & METRO DIGEST 1993 A monthly digest of the activities of the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Co Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commiss Metropolitan Transit Commission, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and Region'- For commission inquiries, call the commission conc'.ined. Jan. 15. 1993 The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN, 55101. For more information about Council items, call 291-6359. Metropolitan Council M&fopoiUm CouncU Governor Appoints Eight Members to Metropolitan Council--On December 30. Governor Arne Carlson announced the appointment of eight members to the Council, all to serve four-year terms. Polly Peterson Bowles, 33. of Edina, continues to represent District 11. She is an a.s.sociate attorney with Facgrc & Bensen and a recipient of the Minneapolis Distinguished Scrsice Award. Martha M. Head, 47, of Minneapolis, wll repr«ent District 5. She is president of the Calhoun Square shopping mall in Minneapolis, vice president of Nationwide Housing Corporation, and a member of the Minneapolis Institute of Arts and the American Association of University Women. Kevin Howe. 58. Mendota Heights, will represent District 15. A vice president of IDS Financial Services, he was an assistant attorney general from 1967 to 1970. Patrick C. Leung, 41, New Brighton, will represent District 3. An aiiorncy in immigration law, he came here from Hong Kong in 1973. He co founded and direcu the state chapter of the National Asi.-in-Pacific American Bar A.ssiKiation and serves on the Metropolitan Transit Commission's Minority Qimmunily Advisory Committee. Esther Newcomt. 62, 3^*hile Bear Lake, amtinues to represent District 7. An employee of Ocean Air Travel, she serses on the Health East Foundation Grants Review Commitiee-St. Joseph's Hospital Aiudliaiy and the East Metro Womet’s Association. Roger Scherer, 57, Plymouth, will represent District 9. President of Scherer Lumber Company in Minneapolis, he served on The Coui.cil from 1981 to 1985 and served in the state legislature from 1966 to 1972. He is past chairman of the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce and now serves on the Plymouth Planning Commission. Mary H. Smith, 49, Orono, will repr>sent District 13. She serves on the Minnesota Medical Association Auxiliary, the Hennepin Technical College Board and the Metropolitan State University Alumni Board. She resigned her school board seat on Distuct 284 to be on the CounciL Stephen B. Wellington, 43, St. Paul, will represent District 1. He runs a construction Arm and served as a representative to the legislature for St. Paul under former Mayor George Latimer. He is a member of the Citizens League, the Neighborhood Economic Development Alliance and the Housing Alternatives Development Corporation. The Council took the following actions in December: Local Planning—The Council agreed that before the pr^^ posed amendment for the Blaine Comprehensi r plan can take effect the city must: remi»i.e the proposed expansion of the. Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); revise wastewater flow projections; and remove references to a Light Rail Transit corridor.