HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-04-1993 Council Packet Special MeetingMINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING
HELD JANUARY 4, 1993
ROLL
The Council met on the above date with the following members
present; Mayor Edward Callahan, CounciI members J. Diann Goetten,
Gabriel Jabbour, Charles Kelley, and JoEllen Hjrr. The following
represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public
Works Director John Gerhardson, City Clerk Dorothy Hal I in. Finance
Director* Tom Kuehn, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Jack Boarman,
architect, and John Davies, Construction Manager, were also
present. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 4:00 P.M.
(i1) OATH OF OFFICE
Hal I in administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Edward Callahan,
and CounciImembers Charles Kelley and JoEllen Hurr.
(#2) APPOINTMENTS
It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hurr, to appoint
Goetten as Acting Mayor. Ayes 5, nays 0.
(•3) DISCUSSION OF BUDGET FOR CITY FACILITIES
Mayor Callahan recalled at the last meeting of the CounciI a number
of Invoices were submitted for payment, of which, one had since
been paid.
Moorse concurred and reported it was to Allied Mechanical.
Mayor Callahan clarified that the payment to Allied is within the
bounds of the contract with Allied, leaves the City with a 10%
retainage, and the contract had not been altered from the beginning
to the end except for a reduction or to benefit the City. Moorse
concurred. Callahan asked if there were a number of other bills
with those same characteristics.
Moorse stated there were.
Jabbour noted the problem he has with the issue *s that on
September 28th, the Counci I members left the meeting with a budget
estimate, which since has been revised and the Council was not
apprised of the revisions until specifically asked for. He
clarified that currently the Council is asked to authorize payment
for work done in November. Davies stated that is correct.
Qoetten asked if security for the Police Department has been
reduced.
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING
HELD JANUARY 4 1993
Moorse explained the holding cells meat the requirements of a 72
hour holding cell, but a security area and day room would need to
be added to use the facility as such. He noted the City decided it
necessary to have an area to hold persons until Hennepin County
could transport them to their facility. He said they do not have
a complete facility to hold persons for 72 hours.
Boarman clarified that the facilities the Council toured prior to
construction are similar to what has been constructed. He stated
currentlythere is not a facility in the metropolitan area that has
a holding cel I rated for more than 4 to 8 hours. He noted the
inclusion of windows in the cell allows for a longer stay. He
indicated the difference from a 72 hour rated cell from what they
currently have is the need for a day room area and a food service
area. He added the more significant reasons for not providing a 72
hour rated cell are insurance, liability and additional staffing
needs to service the detainees. He said they could change the
facility from the current 4 hour rated cell to a 72 hour rated cell
without physically changing the building, but noted they wouId need
to add staff to do so. He felt this situation allows for the most
efficient use of patrol personnel.
Kelley asked the City’s current policy for holding detainees.
Moorse said the City currently holds persons for transfer either
by Hennepin County or a CSO officer.
Boarman noted the Department of Corrections will spend time with
the Police Department prior to occupancy reviewing allowed
procedures for usage of the facility.
Goetten reiterated she understood from the beginning the facility
would be rated for use of up to 72 hours.
Boarman suggested staff monitor usage and do a cost comparison in
the future to determine the cost of additional personnel versus the
transport costs.
Goetten thought the Council wanted a longer holding period.
Jabbour noted a concern that someone sold the Council on this
feature.
Mayor Callahan agreed, and recalled the Council was told they
would actually make money by allowing surrounding communities to
us^ the facilities. He noted all three CounciImembers agree that
is what they were originally told.
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING
HELD JANUARY 4, 1993
Boarman noted the 1-3 detention area cost the City an additional
$135,000 to $150,000.
Mayor Callahan su9gested meeting with the Pol ice Chief and indicate
to him the need to monitor the economic situation pertaining to the
f ac i I i t y .
Kelley asked if it is to be the policy of the City to allow usage
of the facility by other jurisdictions.
Mayor CaI Iahan noted that is not the current policy, but understood
that the City was actively going to pursue that option.
KeI ley suggested informing the Pol ice Chief that the current policy
is not to allow other communities to use the facilities.
Hurr asked how strict the 4 hour regulation is enforced.
Qoarman stated there may be some flexibility to that rating.
Hurr asked what additional expense was incurred to provide a '2
hour faciIity.
Boarman noted the only additional cost was for the windows.
Hurr asked who signs change orders.
Moorse noted they are signed by the Mayor after CouncII approval.
Jabbour inaicated he has not heard of any change orders since
September 28th.
Davies noted they are behind on the paper work dealing with change
orders, but ail changes have been aporoved by the Council. He noted
the Counci I wi I I soon be receiving the documents regarding those.
Jabbour felt some change orders have been brought to the CouncI I
after the work has been done. He suggested staff review with the
City Attorney the procedures they ar^ following regarding the
responsibility of the HRA Board and the CounciI.
Hurr asked whose obligation It is to ensure the contract includes
all necessary items.
Davies responded It is his responsibility to write the contract to
include the scope of the project. He noted in some cases an item
may have been omitted from the drawings or there may have been a
ffii s-1 nterpretat ion which resulted in change orders, but have not
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD JANUARY 4, 1993actually cost the City additional as they were never Included in any of the contracts.Mayor Callahan noted there are currently some disputes regarding invoices submitted, which are being addressed.Jabbour expressed his concern that the building be built to allow
the City to function as it deems appropriate and to get the maximum
usage from the building. He added, some items may have been
inadvertently forgotten which were later realized.
Hurr noted the City has not received all that was included in the
original budget.
Jabbour explained some items have been changed or eliminated to
stay within the budget.
Boatman noted the $43,000 over the budget will pay for everything
the Council has approved to date.
Mayor Callahan explained when the bonds were scid the City did not
have finalized drawings and based the budget on estimate solely.
He noted some of those estimated amounts were not accurate. He
stated the CouncI I has tried to stay within that budget by changing
whatever was necessary. He felt the Council had established a
workable system to track expenditures and the con^-truct ion. He
noted the City is holding a retainage to pay for any 'lability of
the contractor.
Jabbour asked who is paying fcr iho concrete walIs for the konnel.
Davies explained that is a disputed item with the contractor.
Mayor Callahan noted the large change of amount in the owners’
contIngency.
Davies Indicated the cost of the cold storage building had been
added back into the budget.
Mayor Callahan clarified that there have been little changes since
September 28th.
Davies referred to Exhibits D, E and G, which indicate those
changes since the meeting of September 28th.
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING
HELD JANUARY 4, 1993
Jabbour questioned the light for the salt storage. He noted the
original estimate for providing electricity to the cold storage
building was near the total amount to run the electricity for one
I ight.
Davies explained that item includes additional amounts for other
electricity provided than what was needed for just the light on the
salt storage building.
Mayor Callahan noted the contingency available as of September
28th, plus the additions and deletions since then do not amount to
the contingency presented to date. Ha suggested staff and the
consultants review the numbers. He asked the dollar amount needed
to complete the project.
Davies reported $137,000 has not been contracted for to date, and
$639,000 represents work completed but not yet billed for, and this
amount includes a number of things in dispute.
Kuehn noted the City has escrowed $400,000 of the bond sale as part
of the Indenture in case the City is unable to make the bond
payment. He noted the City did include $190,000 within the budget
from the building fund.
Davies noted the City is also sitting on $200,000 for retainage.
Kelley and Mayor Callahan indicated the City is short by an amount.
Jabbour asked about the corrected construction manager’s fee.
Davies noted the Finance Director discovered the fee had been
incorrectIy billed.
Jabbour asked about the architect’s re ImbursabIes.
Moorse stated they are currently working on that amount.
Kelley asked that the contractor provide the CouncIImembers a
revised budget, eliminating the cold storage building which has
been deferred at this time.
Boarman noted there were two items deferred In September, which are
•till deferred, which total $71,000. He said the stucco on the
Public works building has not been completed, and it has been
determined it will cost more to complete It In the winter raontha
than the damage sustained by waiting for warmer weather.
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ORONO COUNCIL MEETING
HELD JANUARY A, 1993
Moorse Indicated some of the work had been started and the City
will Incur some cost for temporary heat.
Boarman noted the only other item to be completed would be
additional signage. He offered to present the Council with a
proposed budget for the additional signage at no addition?,! cost.
He added, the contested items (over the reimbursable amount) amount
to $10,000 to $20,000.
Mayor Callahan directed staff to submit to the Council a
the Items that are being contested, and the estimated
budget.
list of
signage
Hurr asked how much Boarman has received to date for his services.
Boarman noted it is approximately $272,000, of which $9,000 will
be refunded to the City for incorrect billing of the schematics.
Hurr asked about the estimated and actual amounts for
re ImbursabIes.
Boarman explained that part of the additional costs are due to the
necessity to reprint the plans three times. He noted the original
budget included $3,000 for reimbursabIes and $15,000 for
miscellaneous costs, which was transferred to the moving budget.
It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to authorize staff
to disburse the funds for Invoices submitted by Kraus Anderson and
reviewed and approved by staff and the architect. Ayes 4, nays 0.
Hurr abstained.
Jabbour asked the status of the amount owed Pump and Meter for
cancellation of the underground tanks.
Mcorse reported they original requested $10,000, but that has been
reduced to $2,000.
Jabbour noted Pump and Meter had actual design time which they need
tj be reimbursed for.
Moorse indicated the change orders will be reviewed at the next
CounciI meeting.
Mayor Callahan asked that they be redistributed.
Jabbour asked that a list of the disputed Items be submitted for
review at the next meeting.
6
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
4:00 P.M. MONDAY, JANUARY 4, 1993
AGENDA
1. Oath of Office - Newly-elected Councilmembers
2. AoDointment of Acting Mayor
3. City Facilities Financial Update
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Callahan and Orono City Council
Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator
December 31, 1992
City Facilities Financial Update
This memo is to clarify a number of items for the Council regarding
the new facilities financial picture.
1. Clai-ification of initial budget and funding sources. The
attached table shows the total original budget amount is $4,259,500
to be funded through bond proceeds, sale of land and the building
fund.
2. Clarification of the status of construction contracts.
A. The attached construction status spreadsheet shows the
value of approved contracts and change orders along with the
amounts that have been paid toward those contracts and the
amounts remaining to be paid. This information ties into the
facilities budget as follows:
The "scheduled value" or total amount of approved
construction contracts and change orders is $3,254,040.
In addition to this amount, there are a number of items
such as the cold storage building that have been
deferred or are pending. The dollar amount of these
items is $137,295. These two amounts together give us
the total construction amount of $3,391,335. This
amount together *.ith the remaining non-construction
items including demolition of buildings, furnishings and
equipment, consulting costs and the net land costs
result in the total project amount of $4,075,500.
3. Clarification of the progression of the project costs from the
initial budget projection to current. John Davies of Kraus Anderson
will provide a spreadsheet showing this progression to the Council
under separate ccver. A brief outline of the progression is as
follows:
A. Initial project bids came in beyond the project budget.
B. Council directed that the architect and construction
manager work to reduce the contract amounts.
C. Numerous project changes resulted in substantial coat
reductions.
D The project experienced various unplanned costs which
resulted in a negative contingency amount on September 23,
1993.
B. Council directed the architect and construction manager
to find further reductions.
'9
FACILITIES Bl :T AND SOURCES OF FUNDING
F^rilities Budget
Original Budget Amount
Amount by which the actual land
costs were reduced based on the
planned sale of the existing
municipal site and the sewer
plant property
Total Original Facilities Budget Amount
ppurces of Funding
Bond Proceeds
Sale of Land
Building Fund (Interim)
Building Fund (Permanent)
Total
$4,075,000
184,000
$4,259,500
$3,550,000
184,500*
400,000**
125,000
$4,259,500~
Building Fund.
A 10% reserve of $400,000 was required to be set aside from
Che total bond proceeds. This reserve can be used to repay
the Building Fund after the bonds have been repaid.
EXPLANATION OF KPJVUS AJIDERSON CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTSTATUS SPREADSHEETThe attached spreadsheet shows the status of all construction contracts. The spreadsheet amounts reflect approved contracts and change orders. An explanation of the spreadsheet columns is as follows:
1. Scheduled value: This shows the amount of each contract
based on approved contracts and change orders.
2. Work completed/previcus application: This is the amount
that has been previously requested for payment. The City has
paid 90% of this amount. The remainder is a 10% retainage.
3. Work completed/this application: This is the current
request for payment. Again, Che City would pay 90% of this
amount.
4. Stored materials: This is materials that have been
purchased and received by the contractor and are being stored
to be used on the project.
5. Total completed and stored to date: This is the total of
all work completed and materials stored.
6. Balance to finish; This is the amount remaining to be
billed from each contrac W •
7. Retainage: This is 10% cf the total amount completed and
stored to date. This amount is not paid out until final
approval of the work. The only exception to the retainage is
for materials-only contracts. These are paid in full once the
materials are delivered, inspected and approved.
Isv
nmNO.DESCniPI K.if 4 OK *'/ORK WORK COMPLIED STOREDMATERIALS TOTAL COMPLETED STORED TO DATE %SCHEDULEDVALUE PREVIOUSAPPLICATIONS THISAPPLICATlOrj BAIANCETOFNISH RETAMAGE100Krnus-Andofson Conslruclion $90,3(M 00 $62,191.65 $12,293.59 $74,405 24 8c‘$15,018.76• Temporary Office $2,950 00 $2,372.00 $200.00 $2,652 00 90%$298.00• Tempofary Phone $1,500 00 $1,752 66 $142 74 $1,095 40 125%($395 40)- Temporary Tollel $1,500 00 $424 64 $424 64 28%$1,075 36- Equlpnwnf Rental $10,000 00 $7,054 91 $1,201.09 *$0,336 80 83%$1,663.20• Gas and Oil (Operation of Equipment)$1,000 00 $0 00 0%$1,000.00Travel and Expenses |$500.00 $147 60 $147 68 30%$352 32- Trucking $4,000 00 $1,900 93 $1,988 93 50%$2,011 07- Refuse Dumpsters $9,600 00 $3,109.05 $1,990 00 $5,179.05 54%$4,420 95• Licensed Surveying (Coffin & Gronberg)$0,500 00 $1,791 00 $1,791 00 21%$6,709 00• Misc. Barriers and Guard Rails $2,000 00 $257 25 $1,000 00 $1,257 25 63%$742.75- Continuous Clean up $9,055 00 $4,000 00 $4,000 00 41%$5,055 00- Final Cleaning $11,000 00 $0 00 0%$11,000 00
• Temporary Construction Fences and Gates $1,650 00 $2,060 27 $2,060 27 125%($418 27)
• Temporary Electric $1,650 00 $5,458 39 $207 99 $5.66f 30 34r ;($4,016 38)
• Temporary Enclosures $2,000 00 $1,106 85 S1.1C6.85 55%$893 IS
‘ Temporary Fire Protection $500 00 $96 00 $96 00 19%$404.00
• Project Sign $450,00 $160 00 $168 00 37%$282.00
• Testing (CorK .Eartfw.ork arvd Spectal Insp)$0,000 00 $36,693 20 $36 693 20 459%($20 693 20)
• Srx)W Removal $750 00 $0 00 0%S750 00
• Contingency $1.f00 00 $0 00 0%$1,600 00
• Buikling Permit $759 00 $750 93 $758 93 10C%$0 07
2200 Sleininger $254,000 00 $231,500 00 $231,500 00 91%$22,500 00 $23,150 00
C 0. 1 • Utility Work, Sitework Revisions $79,623 00 $79,623 00 $79,623 00 100%$0 00 $3,901 15
ORONO cnv HALL AND PUBUC WOHKS BUILDINGS ORONO.MN PAGE: or 4APPLICATfCN NUMBER: 10CONTRACTOR S PROJECT NO.: 4059ITEMNODESCRIPnOM OF WORK SCIEDULEDVALUE WORK COMPLJEIED S70RB3MATERIALS TOTAL COMPLETED SrOREDTO DATE %BALANCE TO FfIBH RETAJNAGEPREVKXISAPPLICATIONSTHISAPPLICATION2510Midwest Asphalt $4»,100 00 $38,277 0 $30,277.00 93%$2,023.00 $3,827.70C O. «1 $14,390.00 $14,390 00 $14,398 00 00%$0.00 $1,439 SO2950Midland Nursery $•>5 884.00 $0.00 0%$35,884.00 $0.003300Grosser • Public Works VM,57B.00 $81,570 00 $01,578.00 100%SO.CO $8,157.803410Moiin CorKrete $14,196 00 $14,196 00 $14,196 00 100%$0.00 $1,419.60•C O. 1 $6,867.00 $S.8b7 00 $6.867 00 100%$0 00 $666 704220Gresser • Public Works $100,249 00 $100,249 00 $100,249.00 100%$0.00 $10,024.90CO. 1 $5,596 00 $5,596,00 $5,596.00 100%$0.00 $559 60CO. 2 $3,461.00 $3,461 00 $3,461.00 100%$0.00 $346.10
CO 3 $1,331.00 $1,331.00 $1,331 00 100%$0.00 $133.10
4220 Steenbeig Watrud • City Halt & Public Works $342,500 00 $313,415 00 $313,415 OC 92%$29,085.00 $31,341.50
CO. 1 ($13.8/0.15)$0 00 0%($13,870 15)$0.00
CO 2 $11,974 00 $0 00 0%$11,974.00 $0.00
5100 Ma;*nstCf I Steel $40,460 00 $50,760 00 $50,760 00 125%($10,300,001 $0 00
SO 1 $8,540 00 $0 00 0%$8,540.00 $0 00
CO 2 $793 00 $0 00 0%$793.00 $0 00
5110 Amertct. Inc $15,145 00 $12,045 00 $3,100 00 $15,145 00 100%$0 00 $1,514.50
S100 Nofthside Construction $279,9B0 00 $185,090 00 $15,065 00 $1,377 00 $201,532 00 72V. $78,448 00 $20,153 20
6^
i V -k,- ■ ■
iii-faiTlrWln
PAGE; or- 4 APPUCATIC N NUMBER; 10CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT NO.: 4059 ORONO CITY HALL AND PUDLIC VAJRKS DUILDINGS ORONO.MNETH)OOATE %BALANCE TO FWBH RETAMAQEK277.00 93%$2,823.00 93.827.701,398 00 1 00%$0.00 $1,439 80$0 00 0%935.884.00 90 001,571 00 100%$0.00 98.157.804,19$ 00 100%90 00 91.419 $0$,8$7 00 100%90 00 9686 7010.249 00 100%$0 00 $10,024 0015.5W 00 100%$0 00 $550.60^3 4C1 00 100%90 00 9346 1011,331 00 100%90 00 9133 10
13.415 OC 92%929.085 00 931.341.50
$0 00 0%, ($1$,I70151 $0 00
so 00 0%» 911.974 00 90 00
^50.7$0 00 12531. '$10,30000) $0 00
90 00 03(; 98.540 00 $0 00
90 00 OHk $793 00 $0 00
H5.145 00 1003t, $0 00 91.514501
201,932 OC 7r4, $78,448 Ov^1 $20,153.20 1
PAGE: OF 4AopLICATlOf^ NUMBER: 10CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT NO.; 4059fTEMNO.DESCRIPI (ON Of- WORK SCHEDULEDVALUE WORK COMPLETED SVOPEDMATERIALS TOTAL COMPLOED STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO F?4ISH PETAJNAOEPREVIOUSAPPLICATIONSTHISAPPUCATION6200Goebel Fixture $43,621.00 $0.00 0%$43,621.00 90 00CO. 1 ($0,956 00)$0.00 0%($8,956.00)$0 007120Kremer and Dnvls $2,925.00 T$2,925.00 $2,925.00 100'/.$0.00 $292.50C.O 1 - Add City Offices $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 100%$0.00 $40.007200Arrow Industrie;*$8,840 00 $8,840.00 $8,840.00 100%$0.00 9884 00CO. 1 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400 00 100%$0 00 9640.007240Mulcafiy$47,500 00 $33,000 00 $4,500.00 $37,500.00 79%$10,000.00 $3,750 007610Vohnoulka Roofing $156,26.*; 00 $69,229.00 $23,291.00 $92,520 00 59%$63,768.00 $9,252 00C O. #1 ($6,975,00)$0 00 0%($6,975.00)$0 00C.O. *2 $2,733.00 $0 00 0%$2,733.00 $0 00
7900 Jar>sco Caulkir>g $3,950 00 $1,975.00 $1,675 00 $3,650.00 92%$300 00 $365 00
C.O. #1 $70 00 $70.00 $70 00 100%90 00 97 00
C.O #2 $4,520 00 $2,220 00 $2,220 00 49%$2,300 00 $222 00
6110 LaForco Hardware $35,465 00 $6,700.00 $8,954.00 $15,654 00 44%$19,811 00 $1,565 40
C O. #1 $6,054 00 $0 00 0%$6,054 00 $0 00
C O «2 $536 00 $0 00 0%$536.00 $0 00
C.O #3 $2,070 00 $0.00 0%$2,070 00 $0 00
6360 Twin City Garage Door $21,945 00 $21,945 00 $21,945 00 100%$0 00 $2,194 50
1____C.O #1 $1,403 00 $1,403 00 $1,403 00 100%$0 00 $140.30
PAGE: OF 4appucatkdn number. 10CONTRACTORS PROJECT NO.: 4059 ORONO cmr hall and public works DUILLiINGSOnONO.MN- I PAGE; OF 4 APPLICATION NUMBER; 10CONTRACfORS PROJECT NO : 4059ITiMNO.DESCniRKDNOFWORK WORK COMPLETED STOREDMATERIALS TOTAL COMPLETED STORED TO DATE %BALANCE TO FfTtSH RETAWAGESCHEDULEDVALUEPREVICXISAPPL1CA1I04STHISAPPLICATION10522N.nrdinl / K-A $724,00 $0 00 0%$724 00 $0 0010605Bafiley Sales / K A $2,123.00 $0 00 07.$2,123 00 $0.0010655W.L. Hall $12,656.00 $2,919.00 $2,919 00 23%$9,737.00 $291.00111190Ackley-Dornbach $31,000 00 $0 00 0%$31,000 00 $0 0013120y^et'Con Construction • Materials $156,200.00 $156,200,00 $156,200 00 lOOVo $0 00 $0.0013120Met Con Construction $54,500 00 $34,156 00 $20,344.00 $54,500.00 1007.$0 00 $5,450.00C O. «M $3,270 00 $3,278.00 $3,278.00 100%$0 00 $327 8013120J A F Construction $36,409 00 $0.00 0%$36,409 00 $0 00
15000 Allied Medranical $390,000 00 $266,122 00 $80,982 00 $347,104 00 89%$42,896 00 $34,710.40
CO. 1 ($8,066 71)($0,006 71)($8,086 71)10C%$0 CO ($808 67)
CO. 2 ($1,672 00)$0 00 0%($1,672 00)$0 00
15500National Automatic Sprlr.kler $46,590.00 $44,940.00 $44,940 00 96%$1,650 00 $4,494 00
CO 1 $6,500 00 $6,580 00 $6,500 00 100%$0 00 $658 00
16000 Ge|>hart Electric $279,400 00 $111,869 00 $108,001 00 $219,870 00 79%$59,530 00 $21,987 00
CO #1 ($9,267 00)($9,267 00 ($9,267.00)100%$0 00 ($926 70)
KrauS'Anderson Umbrella Liability Ins $1,500 00 $0 00 0%$1,500 00 $0 00
Kraus Anderson CM Fee $89,430.00 $81,987 00 $7,443 00 $09,430 00 100%$0 00 $0 00
SUBTOTAL on TOTAL $3,254,040.141 $2,158,171 85 $454,810 06 $1,377 00 $2,614,358 91 80%$619,681 23 $212,944 18
Uys //f;'
• •• t
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT STATUS SPREADSHEET TIE-IN TO PROJECT BUDGET
Scheduled Value from Spreadsheet
(Total approved construction
contracts and change orders)
Deferred and Pending Items
$3,254,040
137,295
Total Coniitruction Costs $3,391,335
Demolition of Existing Municipal Buildings 35,000
Furnishings and Equipment
Hoist Equipment
Garage Equipment
Fueling Equipment
City Hall Furniture
City Hall Equipment and Misc.
30,513
31,712
49,900
80,693
32,182
Total Furnishings and Equipment 225,000*
Consulting Costs
Architect Fees
Professional Fees
Bond Fees
Discount Costs
215,000**
27.000
50.000
50,000
Total .
Land Costs (Net of Sale of City Properties)
342,000
107,500
Miscellaneous Costs (Moving, Printing, etc.)
Contingency (Reflects Potential Deferral of Cold
Storage Building and Police Security
System)
18,000
(43,335)
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $4,075,500
This amount is a reduction from the original $250,000
amount, reflecting the $25,000 savings on the fueling
system.
This amount does not include S21,00n of disputed
reimbursable costs.
iM
WMaM^
T/a
I5W^
mm.
^gggija uiuMjg|a ^^Mn
r#jKiKr#:
mmm
■■M
^/SSl