Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-17-1977 Planning Packet
•» ^ .a •' k y ';iv. " .S#: m’-M' r 1^:#—•' ' r . : A -. * > 'ri_____-J/I i- ^T-4’' -.iil N ?liil ■>»-•’' .^'.>•'5.'' ?■ i‘ 4 » I |p Jp’^'i'V A‘‘ i •>, -o ; ■c iiiiMiiiwiwwyi AGENDA PLAI'INM COM'IISSION NEITTING OF OCTOBER 17, 1977 COUNCIL aiAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. I. CURRENT ITEMS A. Action Items 1. 2. 3. 4. Call to Order Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 3, 1977 #200 - Victoria Grain Company - 500 North Arm Drive Subdivision (Preliminary) - Dock Proposal Council Requests Recommendation #290 - Lucian Strong - 1860 Fox Street Subdivision (Final) 5.#330 6.#315 7.#316 8.#318 9.#319 10.#320 11.#321 12.#331 Work Ses: 1.#323 2.#324 3.#325 4.#326 5.#327 (Revised Frevert 5 Hall Site 6 Building Elevation Plan Review Fritz Gullickson - 960 Forest Arms Lane Lot Area 5 Width Variance JoAnn Ilemmen - 4766 North Shore Drive Variance - Lot Area 6 Width Wayside Kennels - 3505 V/ayzata Boulevard Applicant's Report - Public Hearing Scheduled for November 7, 1977 Dredging of Channel 5 Disposal of Spoils in Freshwater Biological Marsh Reconsider Revised Plan Donald Doty - 341 Westlake Street Variance - Lot Area 5 Widtli ^ Setbacks Blaine Claypool - 507 Park Lane Emergency ^oreline Restoration James La\wrence - 1550 Sixth Avenue N. Subdivision (Preluninary) - Public Hearing Sclicduled for November 7, 1977, at 7:45 p.m. Bernhard Reiling (Lou Olxjrh.auser) - 4470 f, 4480 Forest Lake Landing Subdivision (Preliminary - Public Hearing Scheduled for Novcni)er 7, 1977 at 8:00 p.m. Conley Brooks - 1125 Spring Hill Road Subdivision - Public Hearing Sdieduled for November 7, 1977 at 8:15 p.m. Loren Butterfield - 3925 Watertonwn Road Variance - Front ^ Side Setback for House Addition to Existing \’on-Conforming Location Raymond "?Iike" Moldc - 1428 Baldur Park Road Variance - Lot Aron Widtli and Lakcshore Tj Side Yard Setback on Existing Non-Conforming Lot and House ^ , j \<\ I f - October 17, ] 6. #328 7. #329 - Davi Vari Non- - Ear] ‘ Vari C. Incomplete Ite iM “ i- 1. 2. 3. 4. #294 #306 #308 #309 - Jair Dre - Co] Sul - Sic Sul - Du- Su COMPLETED 1TE!-1S A. Completed I 1. #152 - 2. #170 - 1 3. #258 - 4. #261 - 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. #270 #285 #297 #307 #310 10. #311 11. #312 12. #313 13. #320 m Review lumber 7, 1977 1 Road ;r for 5t Lake Landing for 7, 1977 j Existing 1 Set])ar.k .1,-.. .. Tcnda - October 17, 1977 ;ige 2 > 4 , 6. #328 n "■r-fiimm 7. #329 ■ Addition to Tocistin, No“oTming Lot Area 5 House Ix,cation - Earl Dorn - 4045 5 side Setback UndeterminedVariance - Front SetbacK Aiva m Incomplete Items 1. #294 - James McClea^ "t?nn^fo?^Stubbs°Bay Marina - Lacks Report 5 Alternate Plan Dredging 40 N. Orono Orchard Road 2. #306 - Coll^pper Land He^ complete reportsiSffiorCPr?l«) - #308 - Sidney Rebers - ^9®? 3^^“§\eioning - Lacks complete reports Subdivision (Preliminary) 0 neion g - Lacks complete reports 3. COMPLETED iTO-lS FOR COUNCIL A. Completed Items 1. #152 - 2. #170 - 3. #258 - 4. #261 - 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. #270 #285 #297 #307 #310 10. #311 11. #312 12. #313 13. #320 terns Sumi.it Station O'errick C^cle) - ResoluW^^^ Ordinance to Rezone to R ^'^“cubdivision (Final) - Concurred Thomas Ryan - Lme sibdivision (Final) - Concurred 315 East Grant ' ^00 . Concurred . tenald Scott - 200 Willow Drive S. '.^cinaij _ concurred - ^Uey fKelley - ^325 «atertu^^oad^^^^^ concurred - Robert Harvey, ' ''^^O bate ^R _ (Final) - : i^l?y“Av^^urrbld “g c^- 2505 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - SSe neck - 3820 : lterk"5^i^r-'lS20 iSVnue - Variance - Front (or rear) Setback Concurred shoreline Drive - Front r, Side Yard Setbacks- Navarre Hardware - 3400 ^horcli Planning Commissionand Parking Requirement - Referred bad. to Fiann g ^ 1 • i --Mr • . ' . j ):• m M I 'A V it.- - '.i' O'. oM — = C\- .■r=‘ W » •N ^ V A 1 ''S I & WIU.I*** » “"-‘■S \^. i ikA'^ /oc.u/o/?/<' st'fs/ot/ jr6Hs /<?-/7_77- -4/5 0 P.C. AcTiot/ IT£A1S Fofi //- 7-77 M., I # I iT ■•% > It ! tv , ; * I Tlie Oi^m* Plannir the following mer Jlembers Guthrie, Meinl^er Frahm arr; Mayor Van Nest ai Mayor Van Nest o] Guthrie with a r« of service on tin Guthrie's last ir»< expressed tlicir _ CcHTHPission and t'. Ilurr moved, Hamm Planning Commiss approved. Motio In light of tlie prepared by atto item be deferred client was prese tliis \vith him. Tlie Zoning Adr plat. A copy to tlie City A1 The Zoning Admir Lot 1 has not be preliminary appi Thomas .Haliler, t that an easement City to provide ?!r. Strong was \ tlie final plat. IlaniTicrcl seconde conditions spel! of Orono which j access easement approval of the (0), .Vistaiii (i; Tlie Zoning Admii he felt was an last March. Tlv as requested, the existing bii %CITY OF ORONO, MIN>iliSOTA IIIIUTES OF A PLANinNG COtfllSSION 'IF.hTrir; Ill-LD OCTOBER 17, 1977 The Oi^no* Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Qiair\voman McDonald, Members Guthrie, llammerel, llassel, llannali and llurr. Member Frahm arrived at 7:40 p.m. Also present were Mayor Van Nest and Zoning Administrator IlanK iliuiicn. Mayor Van Nest opened the meeting by presenting John Guthrie witii a resolution of apjireciation for his^ years of service on the Planning Coimission, Tliis was Jr. Guthrie's last meeting and the Planning Commission expressed tlieir thanks for his contributions to tne Commission and the community. Ilurr moved, llammerel seconded, that the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of October 3, 1977, be approved. Motion - Ayes (6), Nays (0). In light of tlie new material received (resolution prepared by attorney), Mr. Hacking requested that tliis item be clefsrrcd until later in tlie rnoeting when his client was present and he has liad a chance to discuss tliis with him. Tlie Zoning Administrator presented a copy of the fmial plat. A copy of tlie title opinion has been fon\rarded to tlie City Attorney for his approval. The Zoning Administrator stated that tlie access to Lot 1 has not been resolved, wliidi was a condition of preliminary approval. In a letter to the City Attorney, Thomas Maliler, attorney for Lucian Strong, suggested that an easement agreement be entered into witli tlie City to provide access to this lot. Mr. Strong was present. Tlie Planning Commission reviewed tlie final plat. After a brief discussion, Guthrie moved, Ilamncrel seconded, to recommend approval suliject to the conditions spelled out in Mr. Maliler's letter to the City of Orono wliich gives a detailed description of hov; the access easement w'ould be legally aandled. Subject to approval of the City Attorney. Motion - Ayes (S), N'ays (0), vVistain (l),ilassel. Tlie Zoning Administrator iircsented the revised plan wliich he felt was an improvement to the one previously approved last ''larch. Tlie revised ]ilan illustrate^ tlie screening as requested. Die elevation plan is a continuation of the existing building. ATTEimNCE - 7:30 P.M. ;\PPR0V\L OF ?D?,IiTES J1EETING OF OCTOBER 17, 1977 VICTORIA GRAIN COflPiVNY 500 NORTH /\RM DRIVE DOCK PROPOSiM (/f200) LUCIAN STRONG 1860 FOX STREET SUBDIVISION (FIT>IAL) (3290) TONK a 1\TST nLATLORGrTT 2477 SHADYIVOOD ROAD (PE^/ISED FITAERT m HALL SITi: f, .BUILDING EU-VATION PIAJ PdAMIlO («330) 1^- % MiMirrns of a pl After review an Planning Commis ment to the pla Hannali seconded Ayes (7), Nays The Zoning Admi is requesting f property is adj approved as bui Tliis applicatic Mrs. Dongaske, chasing tliis p: property (Lot ‘ .All setback re« ihe Planning O previous propo; contact Mrs. D possibly purcli. a lot rearrang sites. At the applicant had Dongaske was n lot now sudden to reply to th llassel moved, for tlie applic Nays (0). Tlie Zoning Adn requesting a ] of a new house setback requii suggested tlial requirements I is no adjaceni Mr. Muliich po; to County Roac to the Lucill« Muliich sugges' over the same Lucille Olson Ms. Hemen wa Commission th as access can Tonka Vie\< vi Avenue and Ad After review moved, Guthri of the varian 1977 mAiCE - 7:30 P.M. >Om OF MrJUTES riNO OF OCTOBER 17, 1977 i ORTA GPuMN COraPANY N ’ORTll /\P.M DRIVE : PROPOSAL 10) L\N STRONG 0 FOX STREET DIVISION (Fim) 90) 'jR\ V.TST OLATLORENT 77 SILVIY^mO ROAD D/ISED FRIATCr T, HALL n: n BUILDIN'G EUWATION a: pjato-) 330) T h ' •A-t, .ML—.iMINITTES OF A PIA'T^ING COMIISSION JEETIMG iELD OCTOBER 17, 1977 - PACT; 2 After review and discussion of the revised plan, tie Planning Commission agreed tliat this was an improve ment to the plan approved previously. Gutlirie moved Hannah seconded, to recommend approval. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Tlie Zoning Administrator stated tliat Fritz Gulliclcson is rcciuGStinn vs^rioncG for lot aren find uidtii. ns proPtylfldjacont to Lots 1 and 2 ,vhich the City recently approved as building sites. Tliis application is slightly different tliough in that Mrs. Dongaske, wlio Mr. Gullickson is considering p*. ^ chasing tliis property from, o\med the lot next to tins property (Lot 4) also until she sold Lot 4 in 1972. All setback requirements would be met. Ihe Planning Commission noted that at tlie time of the two previous proposals, the applicants liad been requested to intact Mrs. Dongaske and make some arrangements to possibly purcliase this lot (I^t 3) tliat would projade for a lot rearrangement of these tliree lots into 'b'/o building sites. At the time of each previous application, tlie applicant had informed the Planning Commission tliat Mrs. Dongaske was not willing to sell Lot 3. Uiy is this lot now suddenly available? Tlie applicant was not present to reply to this. llassel moved, Ilurr seconded, to table this matter in order for tlie applicant to be present. ?lotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Tlie Zoning Administrator advised that the applicant is requesting a lot area and width variance for construction of a new house. A residence could be located to meet all setbacl-i requirements, and the Zoning Administrator suggested tliat approval be subject to all otlier setback requirements being met. Ihe area is sewered, and there is no adjacent land available for expansion. Mr. Muliicli pointed out that access from this property to County Road t^l9 would be liazardous. Tliis is similar to the Lucille Olson property directly to the west. Mr. Muliich suggested that the applicant obtain an easement over the same access which we previously provided for Lucille Olson. Ms. Hemen was present. She informed the Planning Commission that an access easement would not be necessary as access can be provided from the rear of the lot to Tonka View via a platted Cit>^ right of way along Park Avenue and Adams Street. After review and discussion of the application, llassel moved, Guthrie seconded, to grant conceptual approval of the variance for lot area and widtli with the undcr- TONIA hEST DIAI-LOPAENT (continued) (^330) FP.TTZ GUUJCKSON 960 FOPJ-ST .ARMS LANE LCT AREA G hTDTII VARIANCE (#315) JOATN HEf^llEN 4766 NORTH SHORl- DRIVE VARIANCE - LOl' AREA f, VJIDTH (#316) % 0' i MINUTES OF A PL'' standing that a] met. Conditions to safety, no at of access avail? Ayes (7), Nays I Tlie Zoning Admii Fulmer had been application and Commission to ii Mr. Richard Full daughter- in - law operating the bi this kind. Tlie; witli possible g' later time. Tli Tlie maximum cap; dogs. Richard Fulmer : closing date on would like some Planning Cormis did not uunt to any possible cli Tlie general con toward this anp liearing had bee concerned publi comments. Tlie to provide reas daytime hours a conditions the public hearing. Tlie Zoning Admi proposed dredgi tlie certified p ment of the app so the neighboT notified. Some approval was al maintenance dre this has not be Mr. Sween, repi along with Mr. that he liad cor secure tliis pei records, they v permit was evei contacted a die Roy Rolierts \dic ago. In talkir original dredgi ■ i Dn\l‘LOPMI-AT :inucd') 0 ! nmJJCKSON FOnnST lA'C \RTi\ G YAIUANCH 5) ^4 '■ • Ifis’ IIENmN 6 NORTH SllORH DRIVli lANCH - LOl' ARI'A f4 mDTH .16) 0T K- Mi iimmiirrmir MINUTES OF A PLTOING COMMISSION 'irmNC \WLTi OCTOBER 17, 1977 - PAGE 3 standing tliat all other setback requirements will be met. Conditions - access to be approved by staff as to safety, no access to County Road “19, and assurance of access availability to Tonka View Lane. Motion Ayes (7), Nays (0). Tlie Zoning Administrator stated that Hr. Richard Fulmer had been in the City office to discuss this application and requested to appear ]'>efore the Planning Commission to introduce himself and liis family. Mr. Ricliard Fulmer introduced liimself and his son and daugliter-in-law, Brian and Cathy Fulmer,who would bo operating the business. Tliis is their first venture of til is kind. Tlioir current plans involve boarding only witli possible grooming and specialized breeding at a later time. Tliis would be a casli and carr>^ service. Tlie maximum capacity of this facility would be 60 dogs. Picliard Fulmer advised that they have a scheduled closing date on this property for October 21. Tliey would like some reassurance at this time from the ^ Planning Corniission concerning tliis application. Tliey did not' uant to enter into any agreement if there \;crc any possible chances for denial of this application. Tlie genera] concensus of the Commission was favorable toward this application. 'Tliey advised that a public hearing had been scheduled to give the neighbors and concerned public an opportunity to oxpress their comments. Tlie applicant indicated he would be willing to provide reasonable access for the public during daytime hours and would comply with any reasonable conditions the City might consider necessary after the public hearing. Tlie Zoning Administrator presented the plan for the proposed dredging of Lafayette Bay. lie advised that tlie certified property owner’s list which is a require ment of the application was not submitted until today so the neighboring property owners have not been notified. Some documentation of previous dredging approtnl was also requested to distinguish between maintenance dredging and initial dredging. To date, this has not been submitted. Mr. Sween, representing the Association, was present along with ^'r. Ilepp. Mr. Sween informed the Commission that ho had contacted the DNL and he was unable to secure tliis permit. In checking their microfilm records, they were unable to find any evidence that a permit was ever granted, lie further advised that he had contacted a dredging company and was given the name of Roy Roberts i.ho had been involwd in dredging many years ago. In talking with Mr. Roberts, he learned that the original dredging of this bay took place in 1930 or before. JOANN letlEN (continued) (#316) ’a’ayside }j:n:'t :ls 3505 KAYZATA T/lUIilVARD TRANSFER OF CONDITIO.'NM. USE PE17IIT (#31S) \mST SnORl- LAFAYETTE BAY ASSOCIATION 2440 OLD BFAQI ROAD DPJiDCINC OF aiVTsT-L AND DISPOSAL OF SPOILS IN TlH’. FRESinNATER BIOLOGICAL ^lARSIl (#319) ■ \ ^ i 1 ■A ■ I Efc. MINUTES OF A PL Mr. Roberts wou if necessary, t feeling tliat nc that time. Mr. Sween went advised tliat tl in 1960. Tliis of their prope- dredging projei the DNR to pro projects, tliey Tlie applicant spoils in the Biological pro the marsh. Tli disposal area policy prohibi feet from tlie a dredging pre this 1,000 fee Mr. Sween stai on the high g: and not in tin plan and cont like building crib the area into tlie mars into the mars Tlie proposed the cdiannel. suction dcvic pipe. Tliis i method of the Commission e> spoils. The involved for Commission ii generally ar< Sex'eral menb' of the I vTI He v;as very little with Minnesota P.i Tlie appliciui project. Tn water into t i nued) nn Kr:.\:'iT.LS IvAYZATA BOUU:Y v \RD FCR OF CO>n)ITIOm m^HT ) 'M ! % f snoRi* Lmwin'TC ASSOCIATIO.'J OLD BFAQI ROAD GiX'C OF a L'V a \d nSM OF SI'OILS Vi Tlin IP.'ATER BIOLOCICU ^’ARSII 0) I 'i • i . r» ■ > :•• tiv .v_ MINiriES OF A PLAIWING CarilSSION FETING in'LD OaOFXR 17, 1977 - I'AGF 4 Roberts would be “illj"? if necessary, to discuss nroiects atfeeling tliat no permits were issued for tnese projc tliat time. Mr. Sween went on to say that the mil had contacted hi,n a^ advised that they found a peimt ttat was issueu lo iri960. This consi^ed of «°ut 300 ft-^n^front of their property. ^“\‘Ja^®adviscd kat in o?dor for tte mR®to7rovli= any 'information on earlier dredcinR projects, tiiey would have to have a name. Tl.e anplicant is requesting o^'thf f7s|1?7''"spoils'^in the neailty mrsh area located^on tte^rreshwat^ this 1,000 feet. 0l«§§£#ianSt “ib :,,f™e°Vu"l>at7irof the soil gii'S bacl- into tl.e narsh. dust tl>c water tluat seeps out woulc, go bad, into the marsli. Tl>e proposed method for this dredging 71-rr^or^slAo a SJ!Sssi7exp?esLxl t1.eir concent for c;nnil<? Tlic representatives indicated the cxccssixc invou4d for reLval of s,v,ils fror, the irmediate .are.a T'.e Comnission informed the applicant tnat econonic . gciSraliraw not considered as a hardship with tJ.o land. Sci'eral mori>ers of tlio Commission h.ad tall.cd with tr. lood of the IM'I and lie had no feelings positive Un vr-is verv f’cncral with his feelings. Tlie Fn.I docs littm with Lake Minnetonka. Hiey arc more involved witli the Minnesota River. i4r^.,ntc cit'itod tl\at tlie R3T was in favor of the %>oy would like to create a way to circulate fresh w'ater into tne bay. hT.ST SllORF LAFAITHTF MY ASSOCLVriOM (continued) (// 319) MlhUTFS OF A PAfter a lengtli that tills appl All propc propert ic Tliat the proposed Applicani maintenai Area for shore lin< the lake Applican' tages of Appllean the spoi Motion - Ayes Mr. lladcing, Tlie Zoning Ad preliminary d Malkerson ear 1 la mack of th The Zoning Ad the DNR and t suggestions w recommended a would prefer than any dree v/ould be docl dock coming i Mr. Hacking i received any matter whidi tlie Planning as they just and liaven't 1 liad the conc< out to the li channel. He in the resoli referred to > rest would b stated that direction. Mr. Sjostro!" property oxii along with t of tlie chann suggested th to" the of fee or legality commitrx?nts Ircdging . ORi: LAPAYETTE OCIATIO'J lied) JW*: ............................................................................MEOTiS or A PLA>WING COMMISSION tOT.TINC !1ELD OCTOBER 17, 1977 After a lengtliy discussion, Hassel noved, Gutliric seconded, that tliis application be tabled until. (1) Ml prooerty oivners within 150 ft. of tlie subject properties have been notified of . (2) Tliat the applicant verify and establish that this proposed spoils location is not wetlands. (3) Applicant obtain penrits to deteimne that this is mintenance dredging azid not ’^'ow (4) Area for disposal is more tlian 1,000 ft. from the shoreline and there would be no leeching back into the lake. . rs) Applicant submit credible reports indicating advan tages of disposing of spoils on wetlands ^d marshes. (6) Applicant also consider alternatives for disposal of the spoils. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Mr. lladciJig, Mr. Cargill and Hr. Sjostrom were present. Tlie Zoning Administrator distributed a copy of the preliminary draft of a resolution received from Bruce >!alkerson earlier today. A copy has been mailed to Ron I la mack of the DNR. The Zoning Administrator stated that he liad talked with the IM^R and tliey indicated several suggestions, llieso 'Suggestions v/ere presented to the Council and taey recommended adopting a resolution stating tliat Orono would prefer a dock or access to the lake proper rather than any dredging or dockage in the channel, ^condly would be dockage at tlie mouth of the channel with a dock coming from the nearest point. Mr. Hacking informed the Comission tliat tncy had not received any notice of Council’s consideration of this matter ivhicli resulted in a resolution of direction to tlie Planning Commission. He said they were flying blind as thev just received a copy of tlie resolution tonigat and haven't had a chance to go over it thoroughly. Tney liad the conception that the dock v;ould lie going directly out to the lake with no dredging and liaving a ’T” on the channel. He was concerned about the 30" v/ide doc . mentioned in the resolution, llie ”ayor infomed him that this referred to only the part that was in the channel; t!ie rest would be the full 6 ft. width. Tlie .tiyor also stated that tlie resolution was just a rough draft for direction. Mr. Sjostrom, six'alcing in belialf of the neighboring property owners, stated tliat they are willing to go along with the proposal of having the dock at tlie moutii of the channel ratlier than up in tlie channel. He suggested that tlie Council resolution include wording to the effect tliat tliey arc not recognizing navigability or lef’alitv of the diannel and are not making any future commitments as to any dredging including maintenance dredging. MINUTES OF A PLA^JX- PAGl- 5 I'.TST SHORE LAFAYETTE BAY ASSOCIATION (continued) (1^319) VICTORIA GRAIN CO'IPANY 500 NORTH ARM DRIAT DOCK PROPOSAL (1^200) j ' .A r M V i of all parties inv dock at tlie moutli « shortest point on ■ Guthrie moved. Has: Council's resoluti< of tlie conceptual ] the applicants get alternatives to coi only to Council, bi mooring dock locate of the diannel and extensions from the that plan. In no v navigability of tlie Agreement to indue of the channel as s by all other prtie agencies. Tliis mal. other dredging. Cc the winter to miniir Motion - Ayes (7), The Zoning Adminisi the applicant to si the Planning Commis Hr. Earl Williams, Jolinson were presen neighbor to tlie wes suggested that the equal setback as tli Ecklund). Tlie com been cut in order t The Commission disc of the pedestrian a Such as: (1) conti the neighbor (Ecklui by removing existin, new' 8 ft. ccMmnon st; ing retaining w'all ; further back on tlie lot. This would rc( the top of the reta: Ilr.rr moved, Hamnere! variance and site m code compliance and easement on 4 ft. w; municipal parking Ic on tlic entire stair' sible for snow renoi ’lotion - Ayes (7), HOPE L\FAYrrrTC SnCIATION nued) RIA GRAIN CaiPA'^' Oimi ARM DRRO: PROPOSAL ) 4 i - I i * . MINUTES OF A PL/\NNI:;g Cn:t!ISSION MELTING in-LD OCTOBl-R 17, 1977 - PAGE 6 After a lengthy discussion and review, tlie general concensus ^11 parties involved appeared to be locating a nooring dock at tlie moutli of tlie cliannel with access from tiie shortest point on Lot 4. Guthrie moved, llassel seconded, tliat taking due notice of Council’s resolution for our guidance we recommend approval of tlie conceptual policy recommendations, and that Staff and the applicants get togetlier on the exact location of the alternatives to come to a solution that is acceptable not only to Council, but to the DNE. Tliis plan will submit tlie mooring dock located no greater tlian 180 ft. from the moutli of the cliannel and no vridcr than 39” into the cliannel. .Any extensions from that dock section to Lot 4 will be part of that pl^. In no v/ay does tliis motion recognize tlie navigability of the cliannel or access to the cliannel. .Agreement to include stronger language regarding navigability of the channel as suggested by Mr. Sjostrom and agreed unon by all otlier parties. Subject to approval of all'other ‘ agencies. Tliis makes no commitments as to maintenance or other dredging. Construction of the dock to be done in the winter to minimize tlie effect on environment and wildlife Ifotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). The ironing Administrator advised that Council had requested the applicant to submit a revised proposal to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Mr. Earl Williams, representing tlie contiactor, and Mr. Stan Jolinson were present. Tliere was some objection from tlie neighbor to tlie west on tlie original pioposal and Council suggested that the applicant submit a revised plan witli equal setback as tliat of the neighbor to the west (Mr. Ecklund).^ Tlie comer of the newly proiiosed building lias been cut in order to have less vision obstruction. The Commission discussed the design and location alternatives of the pedestrian access from tlie parking lot to the street. Such as: (1) continuing and matching existing stairix^ay of t le neigluor (EcLlund), (2) constructing entire new stairi\'ay L>y removing existing 4 ft. Lcklund steps and replacing with new 8 ft. common staimvay for safety reasons, (3) keep exist ing retaining wall and design separate 4 ft. stairiNray located turtlier back on tlie property and near the municipal parkin^ lot. This would require code compliance on the euard rail^t the top of tlie retaining wall. Ilurr moved, Ilaj^erel secoixled, to recommend approval of the variance and site and building elevation plans subject to code compliance and structural approval bv staff with an easement on 4 ft. walkway for pedestrian traffic from the municipal parking lot to County Road 15. Tliis is conditioned on the entire stairs being replaced. '>vner would be resnon- sible for snow rem.oval and maintenance of walk and stairs 'fotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). -^airs. VICTORIA GRAIN COl^lPANY (continued) (/r'zno) :'IAA5\PTIE ILARDIVAPJ; 3400 SmrjlLINE DRIVE RECONSIDER\Tia\’ OF RJA^ISED PLAN (/^329) I Cl 'i*.A-:: : s : ••■Cikg': h ^ 'TMirrCS OF A PLAN Tlie Zoning .Admini requesting a vari llOnio A A/’a-ri anrriionie. A variance bet>.‘/een structure to meet all requi numerous trees ar Mr. Doty and Mr. present. Tlie Cos of the Mil behii' are sliowing noiv. tliosc trees. Me cablind tiie trees Suliject property south are under ‘ is available. Aj voiced no object: After some discus recoimend approve that no addition garage v/ould be c .Applicant has tin the residence be protect against : in no way address that goes with tl adjacent propert; separate ownersh: (2) - >fcDonald, 1 Mr. and ?trs. Cla’ advised that tlie for construction tlie applicant cu' tlie natural shon applicant came ii with the present Tlie Commission r< importance of th informed the Con restrictions wit! will be replacin; bales of hay to ; suggested substi faster growing v; would be necessa that staff super Tlie applicant reiroved and cc Restoration pi of tlie other i ‘TA GlbMN aXTOA' nued) f: I LVPvDVv!,\nn lORELINE DPJ\T- [Dni\Tia\’ OP pjAasi-D Mi:trrps of a PiA'nn:jr, cavisr.vjA ?rj:Tr:n iiplo octobfr 17, ip77 - ^age 7 T!ie Zoning Administrator advised tliat tlie applicant is requesting a variance to construct a garage beliind liis home. A variance for lot width, lot area and setback between structures is necessar)'’. bocating tlie garage to meet all requirements \\uuld require removal of numerous trees aiid bushes. Mr. Doty and '!r. ■'\nderson, neighbor to tlie soutli, v;erc present. Tlie Comission was concerned al')out the erosion of tlie lull behind the apnliccint's hone - lialf the roots are showing no\/. ^’r. Doty felt that nothing v;ould kill tliose trees. Mo d.\d state, howewr, tliat he v/ould be cabliiifi the trees. Suliject property and adjacent property to the nortli and south are under single separate ownership. Mo other land is available. Applicant's neighbor, Mr. ;\nderson, voiced no objection. After some discussion, llannali moved, Pralim seconded, to reconmond approval of the variance request given the fact tliat no additional variances are being created, proposed garage would be continuation of existing side >xird setback. Xpplicant has the understanding that garage walls facing the residence be constructed to meet the building code to protect against fire spreading to tlie liouse. Tliis notion in no way" addresses tlie erosion problem. Tliis is something that goes with the property. Justification the tiv'o adjacent properties and the siiiject property are in single separate ownership. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (D), .Alistain (2) - McDonald, llurr. Mr. and ?lrs. Claypool were present. Tlie Zoning Vlministrator advised that the applicant had obtained a building permit for construction of a residence. During this construction, tlie applicant cut down a number of large trees and destroyed tlie natural shoreline. A stop work order was existed, 'flie applicant came into the office immediately and came back with the present proposal. Tlie Commission reviewed the proposal and recognized the importance of this emergency restoration. Tlie applicant informed the Commission tliat he was not avv'are of any restrictions within 75 ft. of the shoreline. The applicant will be replacing ten 3" trees and will temixirarily be using bales of hay to stop the erosion. Tlie Planning Commission suggested substituting 3" diameter locust trees with a faster growing variety. Some further filling and grading w^ould be necessary and the Planning Commission suggested that staff supendse this grading and filling. nie applicant was informed tliat the stop work order would be rei'Kived and construction could resume on the residence. Restoration project could commence immediately upon approval of tlie other agencies. iDMUD non' 341 ’j;s'rL\ia- STPvEHT vmiViCi- - LDT mi\ AID mm A'JD SETIWCKS CARXer. ADDITION ON EXISTIN’G SimSTADAPJ) IDT (A321) BLMNE CIAYPOOL 507 rm: laid EMERGCO SHORELINE RESTOR/VTia^ (#331) A- 11 r I# i# f ’ 4= 4 i. t " \\ d mNUTES OF A PL/IfcDonald moved, tlie emergency rc (1) (2) (3) (4) Straight si non-creosol regulation* Riprap rev: Berm and gi Engineer ai Completion mth excepi ditions so before June Approval of Removal of shoreline, fbtion - Ayes (7 C5) (6) Mr. Grid ley v/as the Planning Con application. Tli meeting so that and a report cou Soil and Mater C The Planning Cot : application had received, uc ar matter so the ma was advised that would be on tlie Mr. David Die ap and requested tli presentation as be taken at tlie 7, 1977. His ma to malce this age Mr. Die appeared September 1977 r an electrical sh that time, the C requirements wer necessary materi Commission infor be discussed as ; on November 7, 11 Tlie Planning Com work session iter Mr. Stubbs is rei setback requireme tlie existing dwcl a continuation o would, lioi>^ver, ei side vard setback LP IYTH’ ’\T:sTL\:a' s"iTj:]rr ANci: - LPT AU’:A a ;d ynm 5m.\c:s .HL ADDITIO:^ 0:i HXISTIIsG ;ta :japj ) lot :i) INI- a^wrooL r.-\RIC LA'JE RGENCY SHORELINE TOPATiai 31) V- F 11- MINUTES OF A PLA'INING mPlISSION len’E^^G liELD OCTOBER 17, 1977 - PAGE 8 NfcDonald moved, Ilassel seconded, to recorunend approval of tlie emergency restoration sii!)ject to tlie following: (1) Straight stair^^^ay as proposed to be constructed of non-creosote ties subject to State Building Gale regulations. (2) Riprap reviewed and apjiroved by City Engineer. (3) Berm and grading revia\fed and approved by City Engineer and Staff. (4) Completion of restoration project witliin 60 days isdth exception of tree planting if weatlier con ditions so dictate. If so, trees to be planted before June 1, 1978. (5) Approval of all other agencies. (6) Removal of dead trees and bushes from banlc and shoreline. ffotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Mr. Gridley was present. It v/as his understanding tiiat tlie Planning Conmission would again bo discussing tliis application. Tlie application was tabled at tlie last meeting so that review could be made by tlie City Engineer and a report could be obtained from tiie Hennepin Coimty Soil and Water Conservation District. Tlie Planning Commission informed Mr. Gridley tliat tlie application had been tabled laitil those rciiorts were received. V.’e arc still awaiting tlicse reports so the matter so the matter was not on" the agenda. Mr. Gridley was advised that he would be notified when tliis matter would be on tlie agenda. 'Ir. David Bie appeared lie fore the Planning Conmission and requested tliat the Commission consider liis iicrsonal presentation as a work session so final action caild be taken at the Plaiining Conmission meeting of b’ovember 7, 1977. His material liad not been submitted in time to malce this agenda. ’tr. Bie appeared before the Commission at a meeting in September 1977 requesting comments on his proposal Vor an electrical shop and gift/hobby shop in Navarre. At that time, the Commission advised the applicant what requirements were necessan^ Mr. Bie now has all the necessar)' material for Planning Commission reviciv. Tfie Conmission informed Mr. Bie tliat the application would be discussed as an action item at their next meeting on Novem.ber 7, 1977. Tlie Planning Commission took action on the following work session item: Mr. Stubbs is requesting a lot area and front and side setback requirement for constniction of an addition to tlie existing di^^elling. The proposal addjtion v/ould be a continuation of the front line of the iioase. I would, hoi>/ever, encroach 4 ft. further into the existing side yard setback. BLAINE CLAITOOL (continued) (/?531) DUR.‘T.LL \ETTER BIG IS LAID SIJBDIVISIO:I (PPELII 1IN.ARY) (//309) DAVID STUBBS 3965 lA'IERTOVIN Ra\D VARIAia: - FRONT AND SIDE SITRACK FOR HOUSE .-\DD1TI0N TO EXISTING .NON-CONTORMING i/rr /\PLA r, house LocATiai («328) yjr rj -4- ,tr- * ir. 4 4= i 1 •.Hi iJ I 4' b McDonald moved subject to the objection to ei located soathe; Ayes (7), Nays A public lie aril 7, 1977, at 7:‘ A public heari] 7, 1977, at 8:1 A public hearii 7, 1977, at 3:: Tlie Planning C< following item: Loren Butterfii Earl Dom (/I32i Ilassel moved, I at 11:30 p.m. i:iP. CLWIWL itinued) 51) T.LL \TTTVP. ISL-V\T) nvisiai cppj:li?!IN.ary ) :i) STlBIiS i r'ATnirrov^^ ro .\d .via-. - FRONT A'RI SIDE :ack for in;sE .\ddition D: T ST I MO M( y i - fONTOR! IMG \PI.A M liOUSi: LOCATia>I:s) i-v ■ $ ■1 t ■* k {I Mi:iUrES OF A PIATHNC COMMISSION ItELTING HELD OCmr.ER 17, 1077 - PAGE 9 1; r.rf McDonald moved, Ilassel seconded, to recommend approval subject to the applicant obtaining a statement of no objection to enroadiment from adjacent property ovmer located soatlieast of tlie Stubbs property, ^fotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). A public liearing was scheduled for ' loncbiy, November 7, 1977, at 7:45 p.m. A public hearing was scheduled for Mfonday, 'Ioveml')cr 7, 1977, at 8:00 p.m. A public hearing was sclieduled for Mtonday, November 7, 1977, at 3:15 p.m. Tlie Planning Commission went into work sessions on tlie following items: Loren Butterfield (#326),and Raymond Molde (#327), and Earl Dorn (#329). Ilassel moved, Hiirr seconded, tliat tlie meeting be adjourned at 11:30 p.m. aWTD STUBBS(continued) (#328) JA' IES LV'.TENCE 1550 SIXTH AXTNIIE N. SII1>.DRMS ION (PRELIM :INMY) (#323) REPOaiARD REILIM4G 4470 4480 FOREST LACE lA'IDING SUBDIVISION (PRELIMUNARY) (#324) CONIJ^Y BROOKS 1125 SPRING HILL ROAD SLBDRTSlO:I (PPJ2LRIINARY) (#325) \DJOUR:-:ti:T - 11:30 P.M. AGENDA PIJ\i>INLNG CDM^DSSIQN MEiETING OF OCTOBER 17, 1977 COUNCIL aiAMBERS - 7:3(; P.M. I. CURRENT ITEMS A. Action Items 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Call to Order Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 3, 1977 #200 - Victoria Grain Company - 500 North Arm Drive Subdivision (Preliminary) - Dock Proposal Council Requests Recommendation #290 - Lucian Strong - 1860 Fox Street Subdivision (Final) #330 - Tonka West Development - 2477 Shadyvv’ood Road (Revised Frevert 5 Hall Site P, Building Elevation Plan Review " Fritz Gullickson - 960 Forest Anr' Lane Lot Area Widtii Variance #316 - JoAnn Hemmen - 4766 North Shore Drive Variance - Lot Area P, Width #318 - Wayside Kennels - 3505 V/ayzata Boulevard Applicant's Report - Public Hearing Scheduled for November 7, 1977 ff319 - Lest Shore Lafayette Bay Association - 2440 Old Beach Road Dredging of Cliannel P, Disposal of Spoils in Freshwater Biological Marsh #320 - Navarre Hardware - 3400 Shoreline Drive Reconsider Revised Plan #321 - Donald Doty - 341 Westlake Street Variance - Lot Area P, WiJtli P, Setbacks #331 - Blaine Claypool - 507 Park Lane Emergency Shoreline Restoration B. Work Session Items 1.#323 - 2.#324 - 3.#325 - 4.#326 - 5.#327 - V OiAtll ;wenue .H. Subdivision (Preliminary) - Public Hearing Sdieduled for November 7, 1977, at 7:45 p.m. V.L.UU ■'1)1,1 u,iui>erj - (, F•orcst Lake La SuI)diyision (Preliminary - Public Hearing Scheduled for .•November 7, 1977 at Sr00 p.m. Conley Brooks - 1125 Spring mil Road Subdivision - Public Hearing Sdieduled for November 7 1977 at S:15 p.m. ' I^ren Butterfield - 3925 Watertoiwn Road Vari^ce - Front P, Side Setback for House Addition to Existing Non-ConfornnnfT T.f>r^finn ^Non-Conforming Location Rayniond ’74ike" Molde - 1428 Baldur Park Road orESsting^'on-Snfoming^ ‘■3. i Agenda - Octob Page 2 it ' ■)! 6. #328 7. #329 InccHnplel 1.#294 2.#306 3.#308 4.#309 II. COMPLETED II A. Complete 1. #152 2. #170 3. #258 4. #261 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. #270 #285 #297 #307 #310 10. #311 11. #312 12. #313 13. #320 n Review ember 7, 1977 Road : Lake Landing )r Existing Setback wm Agenda - October 17, 1977 Page 6. #328 - David Stubbs - 3965 Watertown Road Variance - Front q Side Setback for House Addition to Existing Non-Conforming Lot Area ^ Hous#* Location 7. #329 - Earl Dom - 4045 Watertown Rccd Variance - Front Setback - Area 5 Side Setback Undetermined C. Incomplete Items 1. 2. 3. 4. #294 #306 #308 #309 James McCleary - 3445 Bayside Road Dredging Application for Stubbs Bay Marina - Lacks Report q Alternate Plan Colpepper Land Co. (Neslund) - 40 N. Orono Orcliard Road Subdivision (Preliminary) - Lacks complete reports Sidney Rebers - 2060 Wayzata Boulevard Subdivision (Preliminary) P? Rezoning - Lacks complete reports Durwell Vetter - Big Island Subdivision (Preliminary) - Lacks complete reports II. COMPLETED ITEI4S FOR COUNCIL A. Completed Items 1. #152 - Summit Station (Herrick Circle) - Resolution i\mending Land Use Plan, Ordinance to Rezone to R-L\, Resolution to Approve Final Plat - Concurred 2. #170 - 3.#258 - 4.#261 - 5.#270 - 6.#235 - 7.#297 - 8.#307 - 9.#310 - 10.#311 - 11.#312 - 12.#313 - 13.#320 - vSIieldon Jacobs - 2640 North Shore Drive - Subdivision (Final) - Concurred Concurred Concurred anti Parking Requirement - Referred back to Planning Commission ;ting M Alternate Plan >rts id Use Plan, Plat - Concurred incurred - Concurred inal) - Concurred - Concurred il) - Concurred 'inal) - Concurred il) - Concurred il Use Permit id rear) Setback ird Setbacks Lssion * mn *v . i ' i at ? it P,C- ACT to A/ /Tftis to-^ /7- 77 jm OF OlONO W M<3 Jft' I 0 9 _________ J .rttUx KM* ( Ml 0 M'r5i X K t±K. .w (.71 '• ■» irH cn I,-; -J.—— w /// i = rJi. ^»-4 ( ^ .• ‘^3 \. #' MOoNO •*- scale »potf »pOO 4;ao0f»j0O0 r.c; K _ r^$ncA u/i$r oi\^ X/T€ pi Air PPBy€^T t V M william t. mills r*M'4 fc.4. ■ ■% ^ i ' ! il M- k- Sy: M■'t X N V ^ ^ _l- —^^ i — Moumo / %I C w william t mills yit.l ^ • «.Jr ■V i\ 4 «# i t Pc.u/ofili sesslof* jr£Ms la-n-77 - p,c. Acrtot/ ifd/is //- 7- 77 ran i.; •I .* t ifc»a yik'ivfjil t lb il''- *•1^^ -t‘a- r N. V f : TO: FROM: DAUB: SUBJIiCT: Mr. Strong 9+ acre pa which woul William Wa west is cc parcel wi] Access to his other Although I may be sor setbacks c and bam \ A public 1 PIANNING C Applicant found a wi was concei Mr. Strong attend the STAFF * Ai Talked wil setbacks ( should be ST-\FF - Se Received i PLANNING C Reviewed \ Mr. Waldrc an occupi€ site whicl by iricans c with the 1 variances Reconnendc COUNCIL M Approved subject t access ea 1 i:»'.-r TO:Planning Commission 5 Council FROM:llank fluhich, Zoning Administrator DATE:July 21, 1977 SUBJECT: Lucian Strong - 1860 Fox Street Subdivision (Preliminary) Mr Strone is requesting preliminary approval of the proposed lot split of his Jrac^^rcel (1850). ®1he pro,v.sed split would result in two parcels each of which would exceed the minimum 2-acre area rcciuirement. William Waldron wiio owns parcel 1825 which adjoins the west is considering purchasing this new parcel. He has indicated that this new pared will be a separate parcel* Access to this new parcel will be provided through a private easement through his other property (parcel 1825). aii-Wr.noTi no variances would be required with the platting of the projxjrty, there A public hearing has been scheduled for August 15, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. PLANNING CO>MSSION MEETING - August 15, 1977 Ann!leant was not present. Mrs. Hurr stated that she was on the property and foSidTwin?erized^^^^ as well as the bam on Tract B Tl.e Planning Cor^ission was concerned with access to the proposed lot. After Mr. Strong was contacted and he asked that a decision be delay attend the next meeting. Tabled. STAFF - August 19, 1977 Talked with Tod Kemna at Schoell 6 Madson Engineers. Asked for location md setbacks of bam (as shown) and house (not shoim) on Parcel B. Revised dra> g should be in ray office by September 1, 1977 for next meeting. STAFF - September 6, 1977 Received re\dsed drawing showing house and bam. PLAN’NING COMMISSION MEETING - September 6, 1977 Reviewed building locations. Discussed access and use concerns with Mr. Strong .and Mr Waldron Noted that the proposal meets lot area and width reciuirenents, contains an occupied'(rented) house and therefore must be considered as a separ^e, residential site which meets all requirements. Tiiis means that legal access must be provided bv ixans of an easement through the Waldron property and that it c^mot be combined with the Waldron parcel tliat already contains a Iiouse. Rcconmended ® variances for tlie existing buildings, subject to an access easement being Pr°“ded. Recommended no park dedication fee because each parcel contains an existing liouse. COJNCIL llFjn-ING -^pt<^^er_12^ s^j^cf t^applicaSt providing a 10 ft. utilit>- easement along Fox Street .an an access easement to Parcel B. __ u \-m' A 1 •4 w k4r k ^ Lucian Strong - Siiwli'vision (Pr Page 2 STAFF - October The engineer hr far I have no i We*ve previousM residences. We could consic and hardshells City. The attc before certific Please review p modifications. STAFF - OCTOBEF I'm attaching a c attorney. A cc review and comu 3t split of his parcels each of property to the ed that this new sement through property, there et the required tennis court SO p.m. property and anning Commission g \<as closed, , until he could r location and Revised drawing ling building locations j Fox Street and an th Mr. Strong and jirci:)cnts, contains Dparate, residential List be provided annot be combined d approval, including t being provided, existing liouse. Lilian Strong - 1860 Fox Street Subdivision (Preliminary) Page 2 -//• O) STAFF - October 12, 1977 The engineer has submitted copies of the final plat for approval by the City. Thus far I have no assurance of any utility easements or access easements to Lot 1. We*ve previously waived the park dedication fee as both parcels are now occupied by residences. We could consider approving tliis final subject to receipt of the necessaiy mylars and hardshells and City Attomey’s approval of the title opinion addressed to the City. The attorneys will also have to resolve tlie easement issue for Council before certification. Please re\dew preliminary draft of resolution of approval for any additions or modifications. STAFF - OCTOBER 13, 1977 I'm attaching a copy of the title opinion and letter from Mr. Mahler, Mr. Strong's attorney. A copy of this material has also been forwarded to Bruce for his review and coimnents. V under the ! regulation: and 1 plat for W; hereby app to the fol has not be be necessa Dated this ATTEST: Walter R. ; City. Thus > Lot 1. <4 occupied by 5aiy mylars 5sed to the "ouncil tions or , Strong’s r his r: ! V ; MSf v:-0 t: m mm IInn*' Rl-SOLUTIOM NO. A R]:SOUmON APPROVING mDRON ADDITION MIEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and \VHERE\S, the City Council of tlie City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for tlie orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat for Waldron Addition by Lucian Strong; NOW. Tlfl:REFORE, BE IT R1:SC^VED, tliat the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat for Waldron Addition, Hennepin County, ^tin^esota, subject to the following: 1. Access easement to Lot 1. 2. Utility casenients along Fox Street 3. Title opinion addressed to tlie City for approval of City Attorney. This resolution will expire on May 1, 1978, if the aforesaid subdivision plat has not been filed with tlie Hennepin County Recorder’s Office. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision approval. Dated this day of , 1977. William B. Van Nest, Mayor AITEST: Walter R. Benson, Clerk/Administrator WC.LLS J WPIGMT KARL r. O.E SSNER SMEF riCLO WEST PtTER WEiSS ALBERT ANDREWS.* RICHARD A.HASSEL THOMAS R.KINO CHARLES r. DICSSN THOMAS R.MAMLER ROBERT H.2ALK DOBSON WEST LEO G.STERN Mr. Hank City of P. 0. Be Crystal Re: Dear Mr, I a Mrs. Wal divisior easement legal dt as the £ ina smucl by the i runs, I an easei transfe: parcel ^ or disp' owner ai Pi so that the cou TRM:PAB Enclosu Lzed and existing subdivision thin the City; r a subdivision e City of Orono sola; subject d subdivision plat at event, it will division approval. St, Mayor i.-'. f J mm ■ ■ , ]r :HT w E; LLS J . WRIG HT KARL r. DIE SSNEIR SHErriCLO WEST PtTER WEISS ALBERT ANDREWS.JR. RICHARD A.HASSEL jh OMAS R.KING CHARLES r. dicssner THOMAS R.MAMLER ROBERT H.ZALK DOBSON west LEO G. stern WRIGHT, WEST & DIESSNER LAW OFFICES 2000 MIOWeST PLAZA building eOl NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402 n r?!V i •v.„;i C:■/ ei2 • 330-3000 October 5, 1977 'n^ 1/, » • ' U i Mr. Hank Muhich City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota - V 4 ..7 Vil.LAGS 0" C'lOi'.'a 55323 Re; Lucian Strong - 1820 Fox Street Dear Mr. Muhich: I am enclosing our title Mrs. Waldron own both the parcel which is the subject of the sub division as well as the tract of land over ^ easement would exist. The surveyors are furnishing me with a Legal description for the proposed as the access easement cannot be dedicated on the p , inasmuch as the Waldrons own both the property to be benefitedinasmucn as nmnertv over which the easementby the easement as well as the property over wuxu . runs 1 am suggesting that the Waldrons and the City enter into an easement agreement which would be binding on transferees as well as themselves to the effect that if t parcel which is the subject of the subdivision xs sold leased L disposed of in any way that the Waldrons will grant the new owner an easement for access. Please let me know if this procedure is satisfactory to you so that I may prepare the appropriate‘agreement in advance of the council meeting. Very truly yours. Thomas R. Mahler TRM:PAB Enclosure ‘I WELLS J. WRIGHT KARL F. DIESSNER ii heffielo west peter WEISS ALBERT ANDREWS, RICHARD A. MASSE THO MAS R. KINO CHARLES F. OlESSI THOMAS R.MAHLEI ROBERT H. ZALK DOBSON WEST L € O G. ST £RN City of P. 0. Be Crystal Gentlem' At describ based o to that examina the dat Waldron liens, follows 1. $3 on pa ac ©12 • 33B - 3BOO ] ii- :.-’f cp.cm ry to you nee of • -T . K- WRIGHT. WEST & DIESS wr LLS J. WRIGHT KARL F, Die S SN CR * HcrritLO WEST ^»ETER WEISS albert ANDREWS.JR. RICHARD A.HASSEL T NOMAS R. AIN O CHARLES r. OIESSNER THOMAS R. MAHLER ROBERT H. ZALK DOBSON WEST LIO G. stern LAW OFFICF. S 2000 MiDWtST PLAZA BUILDING eOl NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55402 4* ©l2*336-3800 October 5, 1977 55323 City of Orono P, 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota Premises: As described in Exhibit A ^t^adied hereto, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds for the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. Re: Gentlemen: At your request, we J977'""at%^Oo''o'clocri.M. described ^ f®5g®“„„gist’ing^of 67 entries certified t^thardaL^by Title Insurance Company of Minnesota. From our eLminLion we conclude that the above premises were as of Waldron, husband and wife, as J^^^sef e^c^^t af liens, charges and encumbrances against p follows: 1 Real estate taxes due and payable in 1977 in the amount of $321.10 and $7,780.62 are first one-half one-half unpaid. The taxes are designated as plat 4 3 , parcels 1825 and 1850 and district 38 (includes land addition to the above-described premises). 2 This opinion is specifically limited to the .ratters shown bv the said abstract of title and the records referred to t^rein. The following are certain natters which you shou verlfras they do not appear of record and have not been verified in our title examination: City of Page 2 ■» --Af m mm ( ’ l 0..J ei2 • 338-3000 hereto, nd of for the above- Lock A.M. ertifLed rom our ned as of heila S. ear of all ept as he amount of aid/second 41303, nd in itters shown jrred to you should at been t' V: ; I' % A H City of Orono Page 2 October 5, 1977 a. You are charged with notice of the rights of cinyone in possession even though his interest, i any is not on record. We suggest that you make ^ inquiries of those in possession to determine their interest and satisfy yourself that no one is in possession of the premises other than the above- named o\^mer, or if anyone else is in possession that they do not claim any title or interest in the premises. b. You should inspect the property for evidence of any use or possession by strangers or adjoining property owners of roads, private driveways, drainage ditches, encroaching buildings or fences. Any question as to location of boundary lines, encroachments, easements or related matters can be determined only by a proper survey. c. Claims for liens for labor or material furnished for the improvement of the premises need not be filed until ninety days after the completion of work. We suggest that you make inquiry regarding recent improve ments to the premises and satisfy yourself by a visual inspection of the premises that there have been no improvements in process or completed on the premises within the last ninety days. If there have been such improvements, inquiry should be made to determine and evidence obtained to substantiate that the sai improvements have been paid for in full. d. We suggest that you verify that your use of the premises complies with the state laws and municipal ordinances, including, but not limited to building, zoning and planning ordinances. e. We suggest that you verify what, if any, unpaid installments of special assessments are now levied against the premises and the payment terms thereof and what, if any, special assessments are pending against the premises. City o Page 3 Ml Ml r 5, 1977 of if ke their n e- n n ice ning Ira inage r iroachments, 1 only by rnished 3e filed c. We C improve a visual an no cemises een such nine and of the icipal Iding, unpaid evied ereof iding City of Orono Page 3 October 5, 1977 f. You should verify that no security interest has been filed against any personal property which you are purchasing and which is located on the premises, Very truly yours, WRIGHT. WEST & DIESSNER By cc: Mr, Al Olson Mr. Bruce Malkerson : ■ '• * ‘ # 9, q (Tf Q- J EXIilBlT A ~ «- * Main Tract irtXl “"”J;, west Quarter' of Otu Sou oqu O i Hetf of the Nor'Utwest Quortor o the souU-rwest corhcr of sold -.oulh of 363.08 feet, along a -r. Southeast Quarter; thc-ace „f said South Half of the ' ■. line passing th.'ough a point ° Quarter, distract 670.74 feet easterly from Uae ,northwest corner begl.a.tlng of the land to be ■ _ of o-re Soutlwast Quarter, to -ru j^e right, 56 degrees 0.i described; thence norUaeaster y, o^eiace easterly, denect- p^lnutes 35 15 secor,ds, a dlstarace of 411.6 ing to the right 44 degrees 3 ^ ^^e Northwest . feet, more or loss, to the normerly, along said east line Quarter of the SouU>ea.st uor > Northwest Quarter o . . to the northeast comer o so along the north line of said the SouOteast QTar'ler of the SouUtcast Quarter, to a South Half of the 74 feet easterly from the .nordawest. point on y toe NoVthwest Quarter of the Souther,st j;, comer of said South ^ the point of beginning. Quarter; thence southeasterly U> the point Easement Tract ftt ot «= ».ii of the Southeast Quarter ^ line r^rawn from a Range 23, distant 670.64 feet point in the north .me tner Lst of the Siiarter to a point Northwest Quarter o couth Half of the Northwest in the South line of jistant 715.3? feet ‘^'^^r^of tL''routhwesrcorner of said South Half of the Tor h^Lt Quarter of the Southeast Quarter. Pi$EPA/2eo 3v ■■ * t SCHOELL (S- Ma DSON. INC. V » « ,<•>>•‘V E ngineers cP S urveyors Noprins ,1 -r.SSI Get P/A;eC£'4:I^ 5 V>* /a r- Hour>E. •« « V / \ • M 3^ \ A - ■\/ rnV'--v]\ N'' --.. ! N V \/' '. .•■ ■ • ■■■■.;' ^osecy >'• '' qv? k yE: '/4 PA PC EL S '.1 Ci r^ S TRSET • • 6IS.3H • # •*. '■■;• ■« -‘.'VOtk i' '• 'iE:\. .. • i S *• ^*1/ . ' ^ .............^ • » ^ i-'^I -VL ? v-y*. Uj ; • "• * ■ > c/> ri<y. if .»i i ■ V V-- c??- '^'. p '•' rt; f • •• •A- ^'#•» '-'.V ; • • »• Ti r< .- /''•fOO .*■-• 1 • • V .. — , \ t ? * i‘ vy-: .« ^ • $ ' .. «»■ '>■'1 It ^ I TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECP: The applica center on C I*m enclosii structure i: area plus a each 200 sq storage and spaces. Tli< The lot are< meet all sel PLANDJING 00! The Zoning j consists of will be reni second flooi than present Coinmission r following: (1)Additio] residen Combina* Sewer ai COUNCIL MEET Approved sub. Screen s Revised screenii tvne, ni Also directe< CHI deferred i tmM*'^mm :>•■ %< TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Conmssion and Coimcil Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator 'M. sy ‘ \ I Q /rc' *• * March 4, 1977 Frevert § Hall (Tonkawest Development) Site and Elevation Plan Approval (B-4) - 2477 Shad>nvood Road The applicant is requesting approval of an addition to the existing Marketing Research center on County Road #19 across the street frofn the Freshwater Biological Center, I'm enclosing copies of the site and elevation plans as submitted. The existing structure is 1,543 sq. ft. in area. Tlie proposed addition would 3,360 sq. ft. in area plus a small 15' x 15' foyer. The ordinance calls for one parking space for each 200 sq, ft. of office floor area and one parking space for each 700 sq. ft. of storage and entry area. Using this ratio, the operation would require 40 parking spaces. Tlie plan indicates 42 parking spaces. The lot area meets the B-4 zoning area requirements. The proposed structure would meet all setback requirements. PLAN>HNG OONMISSION MBEflNG - M.arch 7, 1977 The Zoning Administrator presented the proposed site and elevation plan. Proposal consists of two floors. First floor will be occupied by applicant and second floor will be rented out until such a time when applicant would be able to take over the second floor. Addition would be of the same' architecture and would be no higher than present structure. There will be no cliange in tlie natural draina^^e. Commission recomnended approval of the site and elevation plan subject to the following: (1) Additional screening be planted along tlie back between the commercial and residential area. (2) Combination of lots, (3) Sewer and Water Assessments be resolved. COUNCIL ^EETING - March 17, 1977 Approved subject to Planning Commission conditions, plus the following: (1) (2) Screen all mechanical equipment on roof. Revised site plan with building plans indicating necessary planting for screening along abutting residential properties. Site plan to indicate tv^ie, number and size of trees and shrubs to be planted. Also directed staff to research assessment status to confirm all levies. Check on deferred assessments. r«g! Frevert 5 Hall ( 2477 SliadN'wood F Site and Elevati Page 2 STAFF - March 18 I checked tlie as Water l!ain Levy #5384 Lateral for 63' at $8.70/ft. 1 Unit Total Giarge Sewer Levy # Lateral for 63' at $8.15/ft. No unit diarge one unit diarg number of unit Water Main Levy #5584 Lateral for 190' at $8.70/ft. 2 Units @ $870 per unit Extra for 1 ” service Total Charge Sewer Levy # Lateral for 190* at $8.15/ft. No sewer unit ch building), but I to be paid when ' fc.-. Yr U-'X UJ.; . r: 1 Road ig Marketing Research Lological Center. , The existing >e 3,360 sq. ft. in irking space for ich 700 sq. ft. of luire 40 parking I structure would 1 plan. Proposal L and second floor to take over the d be no higher ainage. ject to the Timercial and wing: anting for 0 indicate evies. Check ■ t m ' ' ^ ' : V' N| » ^ 1 V r h Frevert 5 Hall (Tonka Kest DevT3lop’Tient) 2477 Sliad)’wood Road Site and Elevation Plan Approv^al (B-4) Page 2 O n C-STAFF - March 18, 1977 I checked tJie assessm^*nt status of the properties. Records indicate the following: Tract A Willard C. Ix?e 6514 Plymouth Avenue N. - 55427 Evidently being purdiased by Frevert 5 Hall Water Main Levy #5384 Total Annual Assessed Payment Years Pd. Total Pd. Balance Due Lateral for 63' at $8.70/ft. 1 Unit Total Cliarge $ 548.10 870.00 $1418.10 $94.54 $567.24 $850.86 Sewer Levy # Lateral for 63* at $8.15/ft.$ 513.45 (Paid on 5-12-67) No unit diarge ever collected, but I thinl; they should be assessed at least numbCT^of'units as w^t^')° building pemit is issued (same Tract B - Frevert 5 Hall Water Main Levy #5584 Lateral for 190* at $8.70/ft. 2 Units @ $870 per unit Extra for 1" service $1653.00 Total Charge Sewer Levy # $1740.00 $ 20.00 $3413.00 $227.53 $1365.18 $2047.82 Lateral for 190* at $8.15/ft.$1548.50 (Paid on 5-26-69) No sewer unit charge ever collected (even with original building permit for existing building), but I tliink tliey should be assessed at least tivo units (at $225 per Unit) to be paid when building peimit is issued ($450) (same number of imits as w«Ir) ^ ' 1^-a Mini III ■ ■ fe - tr w ' ' ‘ 'C X • 1 'i Frevert i 2477 Sha. Page 3 STAFF - I The site 17, 1977 West Dev< The revi: screen in; spaces. u e follo^dng: nue N. - 55427 Lirdiased by ince Due 50.86 least same 47.82 t for existing ?225 per unit) as water). ' *! f'S % . wmFrevert ^ l^all (Tonba West Development) 2477 Shad)'wood Road Page 3 wri'/ ^«t^r. 77 ^ • ; < 1 I STAFF - October 13, 177? The site plan and building elevation plans were approved by Council on March 17, 1977. The plans have been somewhat revised and the name changed to Tonka West Development. The applicant is requesting approval of the revised plans. The revisions are slight, but appear to be an improvement. Hie plans indicate screening between tlie residential and B-4 zoning and two additional parking spaces. V ' ' f |i ^ » I TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Request fo which the in area an separate o This propc purchasing The histor Dongaske o 1972 she s The reiJiain Dongaske c Enclosed i PLANNING C hORK SESSI Planning C Reminded € Gullicksor Mr. Haglur owner of 1 Zoning Adn single sep she sold 1 ■ .r, )n March to Tonka »d plans. > indicate xirking 1:2: ;k&’ 'I « I; >? % TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Cormiission 5 Council Hank ^!uhich, Zoning Administrator September 26, 1977 Fritz Gullickson - 960 Forest Arms Lane Lot Area § Width Variance Request for variance on lot area and width for property adjacent to Lots 1 and 2 which the City recently approved as building sites. The lot lacks 21,295 sq. ft. in area and 5 ft. in width. We approved I^ts 1 and 2 because both were under single, separate ownership since before 1967. This property is currently ovsned by Carol Dongaske. Fritz Gullickson is considering purchasing the property if the variance is approved. 'Hie history of property ownership is somewhat different from Lots 1 and 2. Mrs. Dongaske owned the two lots, 3 and 4, in 1967. She coiiilDined the two parcels. In 1972 she split the property again and sold Lot 4 which was then combined with Lot 5. The remaining Lot 3 is currently substandard. Prior to the transaction in 1972, Mrs. Dongaske combined parcels confonned to the code. Enclosed is a copy of a map indicating ownership history of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4. PIJ\NNING CaMSSION MEETING - October 3, 1977 WORK SESSICN. Fritz Gullickson and his attorney, Roy Haglimd attended work session. Planning Commission reviewed proposal. Discussed property oMiership history. Reminded applicant that current proposal is somewhat different from previous Gullickson applications on same block. Mr. Haglund stated that application was same because Fritz Gullickson is a separate o\vner of this lot. Fritz is the third Gullickson involved. Zoning Administrator informed Commission that subject parcel was not always in single separate ownership. Mrs. Dongaski previously owned both lots 3 and 4 until she sold lot 4 in 1972. »! • r, ^1' Ja^nn Ilemmen a home at th The zoning c subject lot request woul A residence and assessed approved foi If the varia to County Rc from Tonka \ across the s located dire The propert: residences. PLANNING Ca-I Work Session Request appl: provided for ts 1 and 2 295 sq. ft. e iDider single, is considering d 2. Mrs. arcels. In ed with Lot 5. n in 1972, Mrs. 3 and 4. i work session. listory. revious is a separate always in 5 and 4 until XW 'H» * '4 t-a /o-/y 77 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission m Council Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator September 29, 1977 O il. Jo;\nn Ilemmen - 4766 North Sliore Drive Variance - Ix)t Area 5 Width Ja^nn Ifcmnen is requesting a variance from lot area and width requirements to build a home at the above address. The zoning ordinance requires 43,560 sq ft. in area and 140 ft. lot "i^th. The subject iSt is approximately 17,700 sq. ft. in area and 100 ft. wide. Tlie variance request would be 25,860 sq. ft. in area .and 40 ft. in width, approved for two building sites. If the variance is approved, we should address the access to the property. Access to County Road ffl9 would be very hazardo>ts. We might consider an alternative access from Tonka View. V»'e could probably require the owner to obtain an access easement across the same easement as we previously provided for Lucille Olson property located directly to the west at 4784 North Shore Drive. The properties on either side of the subject property are currently ocaipied by residences. No additional land is available. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - October 3, 1977 Work Session. Reviewed proposal. Access directly onto County Road 19 hazardous. Request applicant present evidence of access easement over same access easement provided for Lucille Olson property to Tonka View Lane. I • : V ■$ i ii % dV n. “ ■r - . -• * L-i-'" ‘ 4-,. W- ■■ 4rjUM ■■■- *4'.- Ms. JoAnn % J. Itoef: 410 Grove! Minneapol: Dear Ms. 1 After rev access di the Conmi Lane over 4784 Nort The Coinni piior to If you ha Sincerely Henry F. Zoning Ac HFM: be •/ M kV-'?''77 ' 3iTicnts to build width, Tlie . Tlie \^riance area is se\s\?red ich was recently perty. Access temative access ccess easement property ocaipied by L9 hazardous. ;s easement I* s 4' . ‘ II Mi ■i d V- ..A’.' 473*7357 1m CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66-Crystal Bay. MinncsoU 55323* Municipal Office. On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 6, 1977 Ms. JoAnn Hemmen % J. Itoeffel 410 Groveland - Apt. 1702 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 Dear Ife. Hemmen: jri'SSr-ssL;; ;SrEx;cun;rfit,,s o.™.. 4784 North Shore Drive. The Comnission requests that you provide evidence "l9?f ®™io?to1he next scheduled Planning Commission rceting of October 17. 1977. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, /Heniy F. Muhich Zoning Administrator HFM: be F?‘T7 i. f v.., TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The FuLner’: a purchase ; approval fo: Tliey have ii in general, ing of exis conditional We might coi opportunity PIANNING Ca- Work Sessior to the City The letter \ kennel estal Planning Coi Commission t STa^FF - Oct( Enclosed is kennel oper: STAFF - Oct< Dr. Richard recently. I He appeared attention ii cooperate w associates ’ mainly in f TV?. ,f .fla -1; y ': -:: The Fulmer’ purchase ag the Plannin the Coniiss Commission I assured h Commission Tril'pbone 473-7357 r OROMO oU 55323 •Nfunkjpal Ofrices icemed about iffic hazards, »nka View i Olson at jch easenx3nts 5T 17, 1977. LI. TO: FROM: Planning Commission 5 Council Ilanh Miihich, Zoning Administrator 6 L O DATE:September 29, 1977 SUBJECT:Wayside Kennels - 3505 VJayzata Boulevard , ^ r • n Transfer of Conditional Use Permit for Existing >,on-Con forming Use The Fubner’s are considering purchasing the Wayside Kennel property. .Tliey have ^p^rovarro^TtraLV^r^^/r oi^rsUnnon-^^nforii^gTse'S? K^nneJ operation). Tliey have informed us they have intentions of improving the operation and property in reneral. I think we might infomi the applicant of our restrictions on expand ing of existing, non-confomiing land uses if we choose to approve transfer of le conditional use permit. We might consider requiring a public liearing to give the general public the opportunity to respond. PIANNING Ca-nlSSICN MIiETING - October 3, 1977 Work Session. Instmeted Staff request the Fulmer’s to prepare and submit a letter to the City which would include a resume of their past history as kennel operators. The letter was to include a detail on the projected operation and address of former kennel establishments under their supervision and problems experienced, if any. Planning Commission instructed staff to schedule a public hearing for the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for November 7, 1977. STAFF - October 5, 1977 Enclosed is a copy of a letter to the Fulmer’s requesting resume of experiences with kennel operations. STAFF - October 12, 1977 Dr. Richard Fulmer was in to see me this a.m. in res^nse to the letter I sent him recently, lie submitted the letter (copy enclosed) with a resiune as requested. Ife appeared to be very conscious of the problems that have been brought City s attention in the past. Recognizing these problems, he assured me they would cooperate with us to eliminate the sources of these problems. Mr. Fulmer is associates with the Research Department of Cargill Industries. The department dea s mainly in feeds, etc. The Fulmer’s and Larson’s are both somewhat pressed for time because of several purchase agreements expiring shortly. Mr. Fulner has requested appearing before the Planning Coimission to introduce hunself and family and to answer any questions the Comiission might have so he can obtain conceptual viewpoint of the Planning Commission before proceeding with tlie purcliase agreements. I assured him I w’ould include his application as an action item for the Planning Commission meeting of October 17, 1977. !■; T- I A ■% * i kf ■ S L: C ^ Mr. Her Zoning City oj P. 0. \ Crysta' De^r Ml Your the cor 55??6. vour cc am coni to elir Busi ne5 I have Ka tion? the pre cat)" ta"! ho\53e ? ir- 1 av been cc as"The to reb) Facilil The pre ^■rith c? runs, « several is est-i this t: Facilil The re' rerair, 0T? t - ■‘^1 Diming Use . They have acil’s nel operation). on and property ons on expand- ransfer of the blic the submit a letter ennel operators, ddress of former ced, if any. or the Planning experiences with ftter I sent him ; requested. ht to the City’s y would Lilmer is epartment deals 56 of several pearing before ^er any questions the Planning r the Planning fe'' ' . - IS > ! I III—HI umm' I iwiiwiiiT % ■''a I. : ' ■ ’■ ' m: *r y d * ^r.‘I 'cr.■yl : r»f:f j) 5011 ?nd Avenue S. Minncapolisj Pn., 55^-9 October 11» 1977 Mr. Henry F. Muhich Zoning Ar^mlnistrator City of Orono P. 0. Box ^6 Crystal Bay, Mn., 553^3 Dear Mr, Muhich, Your letter of October 6, 1977, reou^sted additional information relative to the cont-’nued operation of t^ayside Kennels, 3505 ’day7.ata Blvd. , long lake, Mn. , .^g p-y iinderstand-^ng that there h?.ve been problems in *'he cast and yo'ir concern regardini? continxiine operations is certainly unders l andabl e. I am confident that all parties can be reassured that a net boarding facility ^s suitable use for ‘he property an^ that it ’••ill be orerated in such a manner as to eliminate any nuisance factor. The foUo ’cing information ans ’-rers your letter. Business stnicture: I have obtained from F A M Savings Bank a ne^’ mortgage of the physical facilities. rational City Bank of Minneaoolis , ’-There I have banked for many years, has examinid the projected business analysis and has agre<xi to lend a portion of the remaining capital! The facilities ’.*dTl be repaired and »'ed«corated as outlined later. The house and buildings will be Vised to Brian and Cathy Fulmer, my son and daughter- ir-lav for residence and business operation. Incorporation of the bv.siress has been concluded ••ith the Minnesota Secretary of State and the facility ••ill be operated as"The Dog House Boarding Ken ’-el, Inc,” in order to emphasize new o ’-nershio and to rebuild the image of the business in the community. r u Facilities: The property consists of a small two bedroom residence, a pet receiving building ivith cages, a separate kennel building v^ith access to exterior chain link or wire runs, a metal/concrete block building with larger pens and exterior runs, and several exterior runs small individual dog houses attached. Maximum capacity is estimated at sixty animals, Mo additional buildings are contemplated at this time. Facility condit-^on: The resi'^^ence, p'^t r^ce^ving bu ’^ldint: and ^'ennel bu ’’''dinp are all in need of repair, refurbishing and decorating. The ne ’*er metal/concreLe block building is preeentlv functional. I ouote '^rom my August ?9, 197'’, letter to F fi- M Bank: !• ’’During my conversation ’"ith Ror^r Eckr:anr) (Manager Mortgage T-oan Departm‘~nt) regarding a mortgage '’oan on 3505-3^07 V’ayzata Blvd,, long lake, Mn. , 5535^ (h ’ayside Kennels), T agreed to submit a f’<=>’-eral statement of pVnned im- prov“-e’'ts to the p'TS'-'ral r<^‘'iderca and the ^'■•^nel bu^ldinrs in order to t some negati ”e com-’-'^^nts by the appraiser.off se I I 'i % . 1%, I r ^ l¥ As yoi Persoi c 1 h c B a t h. K- Consult SBA, Na ■ra : cu’nr busires r.'': H nue S, r-n., 55^3 9 1977 V ,•|pj|Qp|l||l^|^g||||||||i|^^ p«. •« ion relative to . , Long Lake, >'n., in *^ke oast and ers tandab") e, I rdlrg facility in such a m^^nner as ansvers your letter. physical facilities, ny yosrs, has examined ion of the remaining outlined later. The my son and daugbter- f the business has facility ’-iTl be ooerated new o’-’nershio and receiving building r chain link or wire terior runs, and ed. Jiaxirnum capacity ontemola ted a t a"’! in need of .e block building is r to F <S- y Sank: •gage Loan Departm-^nt) eng lake, ?'n. , 5535^ nt of pl=nn “d iia- "idinrs "n order to m -wf %m.. rn F'rst effort ’-’ill b«* to remove accumulated debris and to clean the b ’nldings. Flooring and paneling will be installed in the uoper ' level of the pet receiving building, along '-’ith insulation and nev» lighting. The back room will be properly fitted and decorated for an area for small nets and for dog grooming activities. The dovrnstairs cages 1^11 be renlaced and in the garage area a concrete floor ■••"ill probably be installed. Th» b\jilding ’’ill be caulked, painted and craeV^d glass reo''ac‘^d. A sho^t fence ''ill be installed b«t ’-^«en the net runs and HigV’ay 12. "The house ne-ds exterior cairking and oaintinp. basement stens and area ’•’ill be blocVod in. The entire interior ’.’ill be cleaned and painted. Ve expect to carpet the rosidenc“. Not having seen the apnraiser’s r^-nort, -e don t kno ’-- the c’j-ality of the e‘>-ctrical work in the house. Foundation rj completed. Ne’-- roofing ’’Hi be extended ^-o the rest of the house. In the future, ’-e nay add insulation to the north and ’.-est exterior ’-’alls and install ne ’.’ siding. Tn that case, the ’-’nr^o’-’s '•’ill be triple glazed on those sides. As tine and funds oermit, a dec'- or sc”eered porch nay be a^ded. T«fu*bisbed^"""'^ building and its ext«r-or runs will be cleaned and A.s you can see, Kr. Nubich, ’-re feel significant work mist be done. Personnel : ha\e n ’^merous contacts in many professional fields; ho’-ever, I have no previous exoerience in su ’->ervising boarding kernels. enployed in bns^ns,, ana retail orien.ed jobs. Brian has ccnp"et-d t’,io vears of coll^^re anH oge ler they have taken 'u ’lsiness co’irses on n^=nagirg a snail business, n preparation o” the kennel oneration, th«y hav« asked and been inv-ted have s’lccessful kerrel onerations, are consulting ’.’ith S3A, bnb'Cl- r^bnilding bnsine,, ,t ’-J.vside ^eyiou, con-erc-:,! ke-nel ernert-noe, they h-ve »xtersive Jt b-=ni.ne. fro^ber”"" “ ultinateiy purchase the facility" Consultants and business arvisors: r?c’un?eb"d bbbn.bbA business ennuslly end is a fbbid.r/inc^W oH !btTthbebnb:b ”' .‘500,000.00 He is reedy to r..sl,t in ell business natters. ' .-er eoTcny. llll lAl Probl youn^ to dr Rich cl«an the 9 UDOer* n ?nd decorated for rhe dovmstairs ‘'loor •’•'ill probably %racVAc3 pi ass L runs and steos md area ind palnt'^d. mralser’s r^'-port, >use. Foundation ,be rc5=:t of 'rth and •'••est '■^ndo'»-»s ’•’ill t, a dec''' or eaned and ne. . , as manager ?chnical and business Assistant Vice Lons in food, fe«d, financial areas. It Cargill. I do I have no oyed in bus-^ness college and 11 b’:sin®ss. d been inv-'t-^d ng ^’ith S3 A, ss at Wayside ey have no o^t care exrerience. se the facility her St?’?hen is ing about '500,000.00 er coTcanv. -3- any others that you may not have enoountered. I can e?ncrenrb^.rdin6/Eroompr-J««^ rri^:::lh^r:rp/^a^.onnd o..^ ::-rt: :^h%t u yourg couple just star mg a piiva.- to do it right! For your tnforr.atton, attached are orevlous lett»-s relaUng to this matter. Very truly yours, Richard W, Fulmer Business phone: 475-6U62 Home ohone: 82?-l?52* enced jv.st aware of hip and ration • for a work at it this matter. f 'IP- w ,V'^ ' # B / N v ‘'’j * Vt \»-J] 5011 2nd Avenue S. Minneapolis^ iln*^ 55ul9 August 29j 1977 Orono Village Council Aitnt Mr* Al Olson licenses and Zoning Orono Village Hall 1335 Brown Hod. S. Orono, >ii. Dear Mr. Olson, Tn our phone conversation of August 26, 1977, ^ 13 fwm IJTZ IS^/h-orT-an UrTon. This purchase should he complete ty October 31> 1977* Mr. Ini^on has a current license to operate V'ayside Kennels until ,f.wh or ;'oril 1978. Please advise ne on the necessary action ^ toislicence or to obtain a suitable operating license. ^ “e^ wm ^ leased fro™ me and will be operated by Brlan^ Cathy Fulmer, ny son and daughter-in-law. Because of previous adverse [iSmclt^ond suspected actions, we contemplate a nara change for the business. Inlt1 m plans for the kennels include only cleaning and co^.tlc St .rlor%xterior decorating. I understand that any itncturil changes to eiti^r the residence or the kennel building will require appropriate permits We would appreciate the opportunity to introduce ourselves to the Orono Council on September 12> 1977* Very truly yours. Richard V/. Fulmer #• ■ ' I k\ . r; ■'m Mr. Richard F 5011 Second A Minneapolis, Re: V/ayside Mr. Fulmer: As I indicate use in a resi annual kennel Enclosed are and license, annual liccni the City Cour the prepared item will nol Olson Asst. Zoning APO: be Enclosure Sa- I ? V to you I Highway 12 I conipleto Is until action to enso* The an and Cathy adverse ange for cos Hie tie nificant buildings es to the Mr. Fulmer; Telephone 473*7357 CITY of ORON Post Office Box 66«Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323* Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Scptcirber 9, 1977 oo Mr. Richard Fulmer 5011 Second Avenue S. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55419 Re; V7ayside Kennels - 3505 V/ayzata Boulevard, Orono As I indicated to vou on the phone, Wayside Kennels is a legal, non-conforming use in a rcsidential district and operates under a conditional use permit and annual kennel license. Fjiclosed are the necessary foims for you to complete for transfer of said permit and license. Tlie conditional use permit transfer involves a $o0 fee, but the annual license fee is ])aid clirougn March 1, 1978. You arc most welcome to attend the City Council’s September 12, 1977, meeting as requested, but ple^e note that the prepared agenda is for items requiring Council action and, therefore, your item will not appear until a formal request for transfer is submitted. Sincerely, if'p, Olson Asst. Zoning Administrator APO; be Enclosure ^1 V! i'. Mr. Richar 5011 - 2nd Minneapoli Dear Mr. F The Planni; PenTiit con sdieduled . I would li! the nature by October This lette kennel ope the operat from kenne All of the! tion you m: unnecessary and Council tinuing the If you have Sincerely, *7^ Henry F. Ml Zoning Admi HFM: be Tolrphone 473-7357 »f o» csota 55323* Municipal Offices lon-conforming ;c permit and of said permit fee, but the eleeme to attend please note that erefore, your tted. -v'v 'P * A If * • ^ r ' Mr. Richard Fulmer 5011 - 2nd Avenue S. Minneapolis, Minnesota Dear Mr. Fuller: Tclcpluinc* 473*7^-iD7 CITY of OKOW Post Office Box 66*Crysta) Bay. Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 6, 1977 55419 y/ Qir r*-------kam Tlie Planning Commission and Staff reviewed your proposal for a Conditional Use Permit continuation for operation of the V'ayside Kennels in Orono. Ke have sdieduled a public hearing for November 7, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. I would like to suggest you prepare and submit a letter to tlie City regarding the nature of the operation. It would be best if this letter were submitted by October 26, 1977, so we can review it before the public hearing as scheduled. This letter should include a resume of your past history as supervisors of kennel operations, addresses of previous kennel operations, projected extent of the operation, projected expansion, if any, and any problems that might result from kennel operations that the City currently might be unaware of. All of these issues could well be addressed at the public hearing. Any informa tion you might be able to provide to the City I feel would eliminate mary unnecessary questions during the public hearing. I*m sure the Planning Commission and Council will consider all facts presented and give your application of con tinuing the legal non-conforming operation all due consideration. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, Henry F. Muhich onlng Administrator ^<f- 4 ^ I'v': i> ^ i ■■'■ * - 'ii ^ m f' -4 r ..'/n planning aiMISSICN ^ COUNCIL Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator Si O September 26, 1977 Biological Center Marsh ss «i r,!^f jsss.r"«"^^ “i°s; s^f.srinSiitirtSss ;is c''‘ir™“”.s""S ® ____r c,v^n«? in the marshIS-. 1 _r 4-t,^ r-T^r^^^<; m tne iiuiisu L enclosed letters seem to inaicat^t^e a^^-^°/p»^/,S'dfs,"saf a«ris" foc^^enrsVa^ ■;^- _ii: *w. j ‘ i IV v . It- :■> [?>.- -A^-l Mr. Earl : Kest S!ior 2440 Old vrayzata, : Dear Mr. After rev Orono PIa original next sche If you hs Sincerel) 7' Henry F. Zoning A( HFM: be tioTi indiestcs lived. Note I the in the shoreline. lie marsh estimated ard trucVloads. in the marsh as posal area is :ted Staff infonti im DNR to qualify 4J\ j- ■rri .V,rS..m 'u TrU‘p)n)nt* 473*7*^57 IT Y of OIION O Tost Office Box 6CCr>s.ol Bay. Minn.aoU. 55323.Monicipal Ofr.ce. On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 6, 1977 Mr. Earl Sween, Chairman West Shoi-e Lafayette Bay Association 2440 Old Beach Road Wayzata, Minnesota S5391 Dear Llr. Sween:J CA Jb * ^ ^ ^ After reviewing your f ^ Orono Planning for clredping of the channel prior to theoripinal pennit obtained fi-om the DNK lor J .gjj next scheduled Planning Commission meeting of October 1 , If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, Henry F. Muhich Zoning Administrator HFM: be A y :r 4 m f ■■■>' 1 Stan Jolinsc the existir proposals i building pe Council. This propos B-1. The 1 addition wo Tlie setback Side - 15 f The propose extending t The propo of tiie pr the prope property ' PLANNING C( Mr. Stan Jc variance be Johnson obt west. Alsc adequate ps the propose The site pi approved as his own cos Sl'AFF - Ocl Mr. Stan Ec proposal, feels the s copy of tiic back as is before next 7'^' Tflrphone f OROK 50la 55*323•Municipal Ofnce* , 1977, the py o£ the rior to the M ^■( I ^ % Planning Conunission Pj Coiuicil FRCM:Hank Ifnliich, Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: September 20, 1977 Navarre Hardware - 3400 SJioreline Drive Conmercial Site Plan Approval and Variances Front and Side Yard Setbacks 5 Parking Requirements Stan Jolmson of Navarre Hardware is requesting approval of a proposed adiiition to the existing hardware store in Navarre. All comncrcial and industrial constniction proposals require Planning Commission and Council approval before obtaining a building permit. The building elevation plans and site plan must be approved by Council. This proposal rec^uires approval of several variances also. 'Tliis area is zoned B-1. Tlie lot meets the area and width requirements. However, the proposed addition would not meet front and side yard setback requirements. Tlie setbacks as required in tJiis B-1 district: Front - 35 ft.. Rear - 35 ft.. Side - 15 ft. The setbacks as proposed: Front - 15 ft.. Rear - 30 ft.. Side - 0 ft. The proposed location is a continuation of the front and rear lines of the building extending to the west side lot line. The proposal would also require a variance from parking requirements. The extent of tlie proposed structure would eliminate practically all parking facilities on the property. Mr. Jolmson feels the municipal parking lot to the north of his property would provide adequate parking for his expanded operation. PLANNING CaWISSra MEETING - October 3, 1977 Mr. Stan Johnson was present. Planning Coianission recommended approval of side yard variance because proposal is consistent wdth neighborhood subject to Mr. Stan Johnson obtaining statement of no objection from owner of real estate office to the west. Also recommended approval for parking requirement variance because they felt adequate parking area would be provided in the municipal parking lot to the rear of the proposed project. The site plan and building elevations (brick front) of the coiiiiercial ex^mnsion were approved as presented subject to owner continuing curbing along County Raad #15 at his own cost. STAFF - October 6, 1977 Mr. Stan Ecklund of York Realty was in my office to look at the Navarre Hardware proposal. Informed me he was skeptical about the zero side yard setback. He feels the structure would obstruct the view from his office. He picked up a copy of ^e setback ordinance for B-1 zoning. Said he would prefer 15 ft. set back as is required in the code. Said he would send us letter regarding this before next Council meeting or probably appear at the meeting. * tJ ^ ■ IWr;tjv.'r * V ' * Navarre l^ardw Page 2 STAFF - Octol Received let' setback. Bu openings alb COUNCIL MEET Reviewed pro setback for setback vari Wanted appli along west s the area vis ship. Refci STAFF - Octe Recei'ved re'^ STAFF - Oct< After Counc: addition, parking lot of the poss Variances r )d addition to Lai construction staining a j approved by ?a is zoned proposed r - 35 ft., ft., Side - 0 ft. of the building 5. Tlie extent facilities on Drth of his oval of side yard 0 Mr. Stan te office to the ecause they felt t to the rear of al ex'pansion were nty Road #15 at 'arre Hardware itback. He eked up a • 15 ft. set- irding this ■4 % ■ n L i : A ■ ,R- v.L. tv , ,v . 'i ■-'m- .A.••■I Navarre Ilardware - 3400 Slioreline Drive Page 2 U Orri/' Ji STAFF - October 11, 1977 openings allowed. COUNCIL MEETING - October 11, 1977 Reviewed proposal ajid letter j^g'^tri^ an ‘isetback for B-1 was not intended for this ex st,ng I J,«rbaps excess--’ along west side of building. Suggestea soi^ uype - ^ STAFF - October 12, 1977 Received revised plans shewing 4 ft. setback. t STAFF - October 13, 1977 After CovuKil's direction, applic^t has -^-“^-^fZ-d'aJpS wtlet^Icipar addiUon -me^evised pla^ ?^Ised Se building plans slightly to eliminate some rA^e^ofsibir^tlghrobftnJion from the York Realty office. Variances required: Ride Yard 11 ft., parking spaces and rear yard setback. ►' J \ .•fif I ►. 4i \f ‘‘-Y ■4 r V V PuAT I I»A\ AivAj« T OF UjT^ 27 and 28, Horji»|4n Co 4mJ §4 Cerlincut* cf £u T hiftil.. rt»rtJ iJocW t, Nuvarr« cr or> SbK*. lat J. Sc.l#i 1- ^ i-O* Ut* ; o I Ir*.i< m side yard 3 window's or 15 ft. required ind that some ?rhaps excessive. ?nt and access satment to make not be a hard- ‘W. Hardware Store the municipal eliminate some setback . >v ! . . »~i .1 -4 iK' ♦ -.'4- PUT u si'ift'ty >tl« K/VAivni Titl £ VAV't !Uni;-;.K£ OP U jTI) i7 and 26, hXCK 6, NAV«KJl>: HsMCMTJ P«»r.nB(jln Coiuitjr, Klrjivtola * a/ >v> 7# 320 4mJ mi icto »5 I X’4 * c»n K A r \ • r ^^9 A' •,» ’fff ^ / 4 mr'ma /- ^ »l ^»r»€.n^ <•<»■ /a^iP I-. .t; > / / ^ •.?y _ A l> U • V»e M ^ i 3 f .3*? i V 44 i F • 4A ^6 •I ->>------ (Tc.A'^o /5 CartSflciiU. cf £u.-\«yt ^ nu T hir«l. rurtlfy ll-l IF.U It. * li-<* fc<«l .ojr»ot rf, r.sc :.Ta .11 ur. cf fe cf liiu 'uOiuuForlea of Xta 27 arAl ?t, IvlocN t, !:*uv.rr«» -no of thn Icf.lJ. ti c.l -ll !>.‘.Uli.,.* I-»n<.i., ai.o i.l! vl aJ oi.rn.acFr.^, cr ofi sii Id iur.J. Sc«l«i i** - i<J* Ltol* : o I Ir^a. ;4ArK«ir O J'vJor ;.. C( fflr* Lu.“ve»/cr ttini rii.».:cr fr- S: A ; ■ M*J» •>> 'A ■JiS L' t4 irV =•; I V’ <(%' h i .1 ■'■ *<**^‘*: L i* '|,::::v iv -r. i - a 05 O o Oct. 6, 1977 City Council City of Orono Gentlemeni This letter is to notify you that I decline to sign a waiver on side lot line adjacent to my building on Lots 23t 24, 25» Block 6, Navarre Heights. I feel if Mr. Johnson wants to add on to his building, he should conform to the Zoning Laws, as written, which I believe is 15 feet from his lot line. Yours truly, i- X / yi 'CC'y^' Stanley A. Ecklund 2725 Pheasant Road Excelsior, Minn. 55331 r: Sc:tr/. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: r 1 Blaine Clay property. of large tr erosion res and stopped renxDve tlie Planning Co agencies . I’ve inforn action so t Because of discussion I've enclo! il t: ; ,'ii t:.. <• ■»•■«am I • y h. ¥‘m- r V;''- ^1 -I itw wpppwwwaaftiiiWM^ryf^ ” ^ \ N Planning Coimnission 5 Council Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator ’V )J 0 ;ft o October 13, 1977 Blaine Clayix>cl - 507 Park L^e Emergency Shoreline Restoration Because of tiie emergency. I vould recommend the customary uork session discussion so we can proceed as early as possil . I’ve enclosed copies of the proposed restoration project as submitted. < ’f , 4-1 Obtained a building permit for a residence on the s^ject Blaine Claypool ^he foimdation, tlie applicant cut down a nmnber property. After f® After several heavy rainfalls, of large trees and destroyed the nat -^^ed it to the contractor's attention erosion resulted. , °^’^f^^f^o^ation was resolved. I assured him we would and stopped the receiving recommendation of approval from the pSinrComn?Lim suhfek ?o any conditions added by the City Coiaicil and other agencies. I’ve infomnid the DNR and Watershed District of tiie vi^ation and requested early Ltion so the applicant can restore and correct the damage. ‘ ^ t' 44 'V'. ' ■'> V : If ^ i* • LOCATION OF PI Address ^0*] Legal Descript APPLICANT Name ?I'lI/* Addresslli-i aVNER Name ?[Awe Address Present Zoning Zoning Ordinanc Specify Ordinan. /T/Z’ fij/} - /p^ Explain Request \TP/I-1 Y ap. D - UBRt^ ^ /?/J> KEsr^ae £xtent-ef-NOTr=co Hardships to Prq £EAk2_JLQj, EHEftQA)^ C' 1. 2. 3. Application c Plat Map Sect Sufyey (Sketc Date on the subject \sTi a number eavy rainfalls, or's attention lijn we wuld . from the icil and other equcsted early ork session ........ I mam CITY OF ORO®, MIMffiarrA LL 6 •X G ‘'tJ location of proposal ■Wress l{u'i\ Liv.-t/ Conditional Use and Variance y^plicatio^'^^*’ q p 1) Legal Description APPLICA jNT T/~ TYPE OF REQUEST 3^ Conditional Use Variance /'i'7 > Najne ?kil-J 'c( t aVNER Name Address Present Zoning / P) /TT">?:. / V n{ Phone # Wetlands Variance / y I Riprap '7 Fee Phone #FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Council Action i'A ^ Present Use Date Z6rting Ordinance Section Relating to Request t.f'fo Specify Ordinance Requireinents 3 Approved 'Denied - J^ri' Exp Request Relative to Recpiiiements . :r _ _ _ r Yard -2JLL1/^11 c ^ 7" A , I? u /4 r/('c* ^ «r UFR t-4 Y- /?// iixteTrt--ot-NGn-r<:<sifoimitv {ZtR X 77^Vi < r AC At Rir S-'R/'cFrc'L' ^ RI yYa C s ■Hardships to Property (Your reasois for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Pennit /A/9r/ii^crra^ <; r- /?f.9ro/^----Sl^QA£.<y4/A - P/p 7(^££S * ___AoA pp^yerr^^ij ___fAo/iF UK>J: - 7S-' <rerp^ r (f'tist be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) 1. Aj^lication conpleted 2. Plat Map Section 3. Survey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Certified Property Owner*s List of Date l^lr owners A^thin (^aai’ftt; (fi’so rt^ frcm Hennepin Cainty RegistraT'bf 5. $30.00 Fee • ?I yn Signature feOilijkuLnfftA 1 1^" F'. I' - f i 5^‘ a; •% MC5J * NAME DV.Mc5uV'r KvJv'bt-AAa C^^o\c\V•,^A /#-A \ 5oV\o5.V^ A P. h )F REQUEST litional Use ip .ance ands Variance t '7 FICLM USE QMLY icil Action L .^r i/i £ r /Ti/ ^ r<? c'.AA Pc- / n t~ /“*/* c r f'r ^iLP 'y^Ac'/C' /r//>./^^/c :ional Use Permit J3PAM A£A£jS. ACA. 'S-LiS-tof 050 ft3 - istrar of 1- wm & • H HC55A department of finance A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME ADDRESS My6a9)Oi > DESCRIPTION V^!oeyc\^\ r=v>fS ip?3a % Uor.q; I ^f- T*S Mb O.^ V- A 'ATf’.nokV.-^w .i kv _A \ I___________ \ ~ ^ - .ot-fe \-S ?^fttor.Vi.Vdi\Sof^ HP'S 6i4o» ''sPW.n b5a' I h '“. ■. ■■' LOT BLK.PARCEL LjP 1r 3535J ^UCO. Hi3 q ^ooQi 1 W-221 • Rev. 74 Minnesota Statute and all supportir A) B) The the The if maj You MUST certify side of the appl IN ADDITION, if : data of the appl ment Prograjn for Complete this fo * * * * * SECTION I (TO BE TO: A) Chief ex city B) Secretai C) Adminisi /n FROM:q / - v' T prtn * * * * * This report fro Resources to as It is NOT absol project or make that local agen A. B. T a 1 i I'A n3 in^-^ moo fi^dO 6 n (jcp l^i^uCO, Lo 52 ^^6)n \^lq l^OOQ! ^o^ \ f-i V.; W-221 Rev. 74 ;; i *- 1^'s #■ ! <1 & r«4; > STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals NOTIFICATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT “rLppfrfin6a?foryou^wa5f^^^^ folW^g: A) The chief executive officer of the city or township within which Bi The ^oci!nIr6f°l;hrB;ard of Managers of the watershed <'istrict ^ If any! wl?hL which your project is located or which your project may affect. You MUST certify having served the complete application on the above in the box on the back side'^Fthe application form W-54. r- • ft.. K'OT located in a city, a complete copy and all supporting Jatro^ire^ppirc^i^onrouirbfluWtted to the Administrator of the Shoreland Manage- ment Program for the affected county. complete this form for each notice served on a local government official ****************** ************ SECTION I (TO BE COl^LETED BY APPLICAliT) TO:A) Chief executive officer of X\\e<check)^ C3 city, O township of (( //Yj': ^(pi*int or typB. yicoTis)^ , j c the>Li^ t'//i//' ■^ ( /ilf*/^watershed district.B) Secretary of the board of managers of county. 0 Administrator of the shoreland management program )!O FROM: ^}\i^ /) ^ o '/v; • V - KiOcC'd ------q ’(piknt or ty^fI neem and address of aopl%CLmtj Dat e:/^-/-3 isTZ ******* INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT This report from provides you an opportunity donrthe''!e!!e!wd°pe™it!*’ Resources to assist in deciding whether to gran , mo j jj approve or disapprove the It is NOT absolutely necessary for local agencies to f dLired Ic is requested pro ect or make any recommendation, although this may be done if desired. q that local agencies indicate the following, as applic.able. A The relationship of the proposed project to local plans for the b’. ?L^^!:!at!:n:Mro/!hf;!o]:ct-to local mnd use controls including flood plain and/or shoreland regulations. (contiriued on reven'e szde) S\f ........*************** ^ ^1 11 § 5- A ,k- # % ! > r -3t.-h': d: ■ " .’n- ' Jk ' '‘f % Vdy-'. If M 9 V ■ • C. D. E. F. Please comolc this page wit needed. * * SECTION II ( The applicant application o are submitted (Attach add RETURN TO: DEPARTMENT OF Division of W Regulations U Centennial Bu St. Paul, MN - u- a complete copy vhich trict, project he box on the back id all supporting ;horeland Man age- k ******* watershed district. county ype name) iq77 * * ** * * * * artment of Natural equested permit. or disapprove the d. It is requested or the s including 1 **.. w-221 D. E. F. Any possible effects of the proposed project on the water resource, navigation, fish and wildlife, conservation, pollution, and the general public interest. Any recommended modifications in the proposal or other alternative way of achieving the desired objective which would reduce undesirable effects. Any pertinent factual data available concerning the water body or the proposed project. Reasons for any local objections. Please comolete this form and return to the address shown in the lower left corner of A this page within 15 days, if possible, or inform the department if additional time is needed. SECTION II (TO BE COIdPLETED BY CITY, TOWNSHIP, WATERSHED DISTRICT OR COUNTY) The applicant named on the opposite side of this form submitted a copy of his water permit application on It has been reviewed and the following comments are submitted for consideration by the Department of Natural Resources. (Attach additional sheets if necessary)Dated Gov't Official's name RETURN TO:(print or type) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Waters, Soils 5 Minerals Regulations Unit Centennial Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Signature Title Address K- S4. Rev. 74 (vrint quarter section(s) county(ies) Iftre ikk applies pursuant public watcr(s) n herewith and made IT IS PROPOSED TO (check THE FOLLOWING: L (check) L Explain why this 1. Anticipated c 2. Unavoidable I bcl 3. Alternatives pe 1. Describe the 2. Describe th< 3. Describe th< 4. Describe ty 5. ENCLOSE SKh w-221 esoiirce, the rnative nJesirable ody or the ft corner of onal time is m) his water permit ollowing comments 1 ( ic it it it It it it pint or type) • V•Si":.'. ■■ ■'x: «T*-r • : . . . STATE OF MINNESOTA DErARTW;NT of NATURAL Division of Kntcrs. Soils & Minerals Tprjnt or r^eT quarter section(s) application for permit to work in public waters /the owner of laiv^n^Goveniment lot(s) _ 1 I U range (s')1 1^. \\)\o T ’'(fZfTnoTiTox no. or aUrese) ^____, township no.(s)-----------------•' ° ^ . _frSrJL-^------—(-f^t^Tloak S cMtvunon) I . p. Mil’n/ ____ countyCies, ikmPdLLbf -- herewith and made a part hereof. PROPOSAL ,T IS g-?rsr,ri!’/^ab?.!,5onl"?r U^c-ify) J_ (check) L:CJ l—/ Explain why this project is noc-ded; JUSTIFjCATlON ICVA EN\1R0NMESTAL IMPACr 1. Anticipated changes in water and related land resources: . Unavoidable hut anticipated detrinental effects: 3. Alternatives to the action proposed: /jeC- PROJECT SITE DATA 1. Describe the type and amount of aquatic .cki ition present. 2. Describe the nature of the material beneati. the water: 3. Describe the nature of the upland area: 4. Describe t>'pe and amount of nearby shoreland development: 5. ENCLOSE SKETCH DESCRIBING WATER LEVEL FLUCITJAT1ONS. leee tr.sln<dtio»:8 on reverse side) AITACH EXTRA SHEETS IF NbCj^SAI^ % h j I .4 '1 i Channel 1 ing^ Total length (feet) Length in lake/stre Bottom width (feet) Side slopes (ratio) Average depth (feet Gradient (%)'- - - * 1, Describe typ< 2. Describe loc 3. Would mainte 4. Volume of ma Sand or grav AITACHMENTS [J $ Applicant declare* representation of Commissioner of N: COMPLETE APPLICAT 0 dope l^arie c stre \ mieU-i'__l_ Ncune of (3) Shoreland Ma State of Minnesot County of on this who being first < application, ack' that the statene bes w-54 Channel ling Total length (feet) - - - - - - - - Length in lake/strcam (feet)- - - Bottom width (feet) ------- Side slopes (ratio) ------- Average depth (feet)- ------ Gradient (%)- Existing CQ?^TRUCT10S DATA (aloo attach ehetah or dreading) A11 crations shoreProposed Distance along shore (feet) Proposed Distance waterward (feet) Thickness of fill material (feet)- - ^ Depth of excavation (feet) - - 1. Describe type of excavation equipment to be used, if known. 2. Describe location (include rn-ap) and characteristics of spoil disposal site proposed: 3. Would maintenance excavation be necessary ? (check) OJ yes LJJ no Explain: 4. Volume of material to be removed «-'*ially (avbvc yards): Muck or silt Sand or gravel Rock or stone _ _ _ MTACHMF.NTS LJ $15.00 filing fee, O photographs, CJ other (spe^tfn)----- App^le:. Oeeleres that lnfor.atl.n ™h.ltte. herewith anO statejen^ —* SMrs;:r‘nf1-a:irarp “;n-^s'rs'p'r?L^fI"l ::i5J;:e“S?‘the c.rreetness thereof. COMPLETE APPLICATION SUBMllTED TO: 0 fiP^JC Name of city or tov'iskip street & post offtce itu\e L/v Ttol' til- 'Name of rMtershed district (3) Shoreland Management Administrator County Dated this _day of Signed (applicant) (lessee) Address City State Zip code State of Minnesota ) ss.affidavit Phone County of ) on this day of , 19 before me personnally appeared who being first duly sworn and to me known to be the person - - application, acknowledge(s) that executed the same as who executed the foregoing own free act and deed and appi 1 V-£l t X V/H ^ V ^ that tha slatanonts, .aps, plans, docunenrs, and orhor snpporUng data .are iruc and correct according best knowledge and belief. Notary Public _ _ _ County My commission expires •j:; Trnmmm TO:Pin FRa«l:Har D.ME:Oct SUBJECT:Jai Sul Tliis proposal and the east ! (not conplete' The proposal « lot is shoiiTi < buildable are; point of both required by o 'Fhe proposed wide. Our po been requirin easernent on t drainage case City engineer single tract The location County Road 6 A park dedica final plat. The area is t Copies of the the City Admi County Public A Public Heal w-54 r draAng) •feet)-------------- Proposed JkQ^ osed : Explain: e a true and correct with the (applicant) (lessee) Zip code Phone appeared the foregoing act and deed and d correct according County ‘•.4 ■ .f! 'mrn‘ #• w 't f 3: . ■ *V I -c.' 4 -m¥ 'W JR?' ]■ 1 j i' - 111 TO: FROM; DATE; Planning Cormission ^ Council Hank^tuhich, Zoning Administrator October 13, 1977 SUBJECT; James Lawrence - 1550 Sixth Avenue N. Subdivision (Preliminary) M. o i i Tliis nrcnosal consists of a subdivision and rearrangement of the Lawcnce property and the cast lot of the subdivision proposal recently submitted by Douglas Dayton (not complete). The proposal consists of eight building sites. Altliougli tlio total area of each lot is shwvn on the preliminary plat, there is no indication of uetlands or diy Lildable areas on the individual parcels. Kc might consider this from the stand- point of both conservation easciiicnts and calculating dry buildable areas as required by code - 2 acres (87,120 sq. ft.). The proposed road, although exceeding 500 ft. ^ is indicated ^ ^VeWe wide. Our policy has been 60 ft. on roads exceeding 500 ft. in length, he ve been requiring easements on private access roads ^shich include tlie easement on the road and utility and drainage casements along tlie road. drainage easements should be determined after review and reconmiendation by the City engineer. I might also suggest the private access road be designated as single tract for simplification of description. The location of the Lawrence residence is indicated on the map. Hie access fr^ County Road 6 as proposed lies immediately west and adjacent to the Lee property. A park dedication fee of $250.00 per lot would be forthcoming upon approval of final plat. The area is beautifully wooded but quite hilly. Copies of the proposal along with requests for coinmcnts have been forwarded to tte City Administrator, City Attorney, City engineer. City Public horks Director, County Public IVorkn Director and Watershed District. A Public Hearing has been scheduled for November 7, 1977 at 7:45 p.m. ■* i * ^‘■ii ti.ai MiiHHMii^rite ^ •*-^ ormo, miininesota Q ; , ^ Land Use Application // {-tJ H-.J) ~ Fee Date T'/^/'7'? Street Location of Property: 1550 Sixth Avenue Norths Orono Legal Description of Property: See attached cite plan______ a^er: James F. Lawrence 1550 Sixth Avenue North (Name)XAddrcssJ XPHoneJ Type of Rec{uest: _Rezoning Va r i ance X Conditional Use PenTiit Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request:_ James F. Lawrence James F. Lawrence (Applicant)XOwrier) X ‘y /r /> Please draw or attacR a slcetch of jpropbseH stincture shov\%ig tlieTbllowing: 1. Indicate North 6. 2. Location on Lot 7. 3. Adjacent Strc*et Najries 8. ^ Location of setback and use of adjacent existing building. Distances between any proposed structures '—^ and structures on adjacent property. Dimensions of proposed stiucture. Proposed setbacks Zoning in force in this area Exhibit Submitted: Map or plat sho^^^ing the property affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boundaries or the property affected by proposed change. .Abstractors or attorneys certification listing the nairtes and address of the owners of he land within 500 ft. of the boundaries of the property requesting tlie change or lezoning as those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Petition showing 50% of property owners "witliin 300 ft. favoring re zoning or variance. X______ Village recoiiniicndations: rmmf ' •£o£-----^ V"^S.OOC * 0 ic<' \ t •• iirsi- V A' lA \ = \ ^ \ * \ "■Ay 5C4 L E DA TE SEA / f. OWNE/l_/^Dl JAMES F LAWH 1150 - STH AVE. long lake , M I*rtcrlpilon j (Plione) e Pemut proval ice J ing: ed structure his area of the boundaries the cnsTiers of change or rezoning County. g or variance 7______ ’4 *4 u i uiiid’'".t?■<*:. ■ PROF'OtEL SUBDIV'SIO^ (f tanglewood ‘r„v.~A\-y #323 4» ut---------- ^BOOO 1« /V f ^5.300 5v 9j >9 ' • * *1^.000 %2 Cr'?\/ •*» V. \ ------------* - «« >>- K*'- s’ •*. - ;y \ cj .t/ \ A A ^ V.1 i9,000 39 /V \ \ I# •«»» .V /L G 7 .'i ••’***•'' pj‘ 65 >00 ^ SCALE ■ / /A/C// ^ /<7a cf/rr /:»/3r£' •• CLP. 0. 197 7 SEA lEVEL DATUM '*y L- 0 7(N_LE.^-.J^E V elope r SURVEYOR ! I| JAMES F LAWRENCE 1150 - 6 TH AVENUE NORTH long lake , MINNESOTA GORDON R COFFIN SURVEYOR & PLANNER LONG LAKE . MINNESOTA A total ahea • &c&,ooo so TT — -1 ^*^^roc*. fi, l^Dd Survt'y t r vv.,« Lc^utV-esl qtiiirtor of r>" r-«. ::;;i or c„..crju<! Sec'Jcn ?V, 1o*TiM.:o Ilk •(■rl., h>r.i ^ o, t-i'l -ejl !! ;;iu.v/. r.,T.r.Uv «t « r,n 1*.- ^'"V * "« ...,t ,.„l. of U... f.ou > M S -'K ^ Ji^• JU-'J' • > m ^3 ceOPGC P. J' WAP PEN EE. RALPH W. PE OOU G LAS J. mark t. sol HANS r. ZIM6 City Cc city o: Orono , Gentle list o bounda of the inforn Hennej DJC/j Enclo ‘ i'. >00 \ s \ A \ \ \ Ijr |- i\ 1 H % ' 'V '■" :♦ J irU'ijA . J JOHNSON a ElASTLU 0 4 O Q CtOPGE R. JOHNSON WARPCN C.EASTLUNO RALPH W. PCTEPSON OOUGLAS J- CARNEY mark T. SOLSTAD mans r. 2IMMEPMANN ,702 M.OWCST PLAZA BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS 5 5^02 3 3 & - 6 931 e I 2 SeptGinbGr 271 1977 City Council City of Orono Orono, MN 55391 Re: Subdivision .cq Sixth Avonue NorthJames F. Lawrence, 155U bixr Gentlemen:emen: • « a in connection with^the ^land within*^300 feet of the list of names and as determined from the recor boundaries of the ?>^°P°^f,ltor i certify that to the best of my Slie^f fhf rt^Iched list reflects the records of Hennepin County Auditor Very-xtruly yoi^s V / for JOipi'SON & EAST^^UND DJC/jl Enclosure ".v <1,. f !;y m 'i :2i SUBJECT: Another goo have to res Lots 8 and is located Reiling. deed, tlie i The Johnson The purchas the parcels property hi Oberhauser, these propc Combining 1 the propose appears to I want to ( same area, occupied b’ be necessa: from parti< a garage, this struc will be ap; variance t- address tb son or dau I*ve forwa to the Cit Director. A Public IT 8:00 p.m. V. .fU, O 339 - B93I 612 am enclosing a feet of th© m the records est of my cords of the I I I 7A*. - fW/ \ r •. , Planning Cui.mission P| Council Hank Muhich, Zoning Adjninistrator October 13, 1977 Bernhard Reiling (Lou Obediauser) - 4470 and 4480 Forest Lake Landing Subdivision (Preliminary) or Lot Rearr;ingcmcnt Another goodie!I hh have here another one of tliose existing situations that we'll have to resolve for everyone's benefit. Lots 8 and 9 as currently platted, are occupied by two residences. One residence L located oA the lot linL^ Both properties wro previously oi.-ned Reiling. Within the past three years, the Halm s pmchased, a co deed the residence to the south with a meotr. and boimds description of the land. The Johnson's purdiased the property to the north under a similar agrecnen . The Durchaser ’s have recently considered fulfilling the contract but learned tiiat ;;; "s“" Combinine these lots would only result in two residences on one parcel. Although thfjrollfsed rearrangement is in conflict with our policies and ordinances, it appears to be the best solution. I want to call your attention to another situation which currently exists in this fE.Ei'BrtiEs if the*stn>«ure BBtEBher°l^atlon^as address the issue. I've been infoimed that Lot 7 is currently owned by either a son or daughter of the Halm's. I've fonyarded copies of the proposed rearr^gement along to the City Administrator, City Attorney, City Pngincer and City Public horks Director. A Public Hearing has been scheduled to be held by the Planning Commission at 8:00 p.m. on November 7, 1977. 1 4 f • r L 1 Street Locatic * I>egal Descript O-vner: Bernha Contract Purcha Type of Re(.p)es In the suir.iaer offered for sa On these two ] attached and f piece and heir division of tl Scheller and v divide and the houses met the followed the £ 1975, sold th; Ralph L. Halm of the proper! sarae was sold with Mr. Halm dated April 9, of Mr. Schell; Nothing furthc then laid in ; Halm's attornc and that Mr. I for Deed until 9. Copy of Mi by the survey, one house heir 8 and 9. The merits of the C and the width the subdivisic each parcel of increase the t ilie hardship t has allowed ti. Lalce Landing .ons that we‘11 One residence >y Bemliard i contract for I of the land, ’reeincnt. learned tiiat e, neither is. Mr. or subdividing fied. cel. Although inances, it :ists in this x)t 7 is also ;toration might le inquiries Locations as iidence in mse that I lir-ng a 3ve we should by either a iest for comments iblic Works mission at '■Hi •: L i, V K m 4 *t ■ /^v b!* o OF OkD?«, ]-1DWES0TA J Use A}jp]JcatJ_on Cas-e Mo,_________ Fee _______ Date Street.Location of Proj^rty: and AA70 F^orest Lak^ * I>egal Description of Projorty:' Lots 8 and 9, Tonkayiew pardons, Hennepin County, M|nnosota Owner: Bernhard Relllng l''^'-'0 Leeway Drive, Orlando, Florida_ 32810 ^ 6^4-435^^ - - - - -“ ■ ' ' lAddress) tPl.one) Contract Purchasers: Douglas Johnson ^^80 Forest Lake Lan ^ ”8 /,/? -b0 79 Type'of Pecp.est: Use Pennit Variance . ^ _ Subdivision Appioval Other In the suniuier of ]976, Bernhard Keiling offered his property for sale. 'Hie property being offered for sale was Lots 8 and 9, Tonkaview Card..ns, Ih nnepin County, Minnesota. On these two lots two liouses had been constructed in accordance with the survey hereto attached and prepared by Gordon Coffin.^ After .attempting to sell the property as a single piece and being unsuccessful, Mr. Reiling was told that he should attempt to secure -a -oib- division of the property and sell them as separate parcels. Mr. Reiling contacted Michael Scheller and was told that since there were two l)Ouses on the property that he could sub divide and that bo could hire a stirveyor to draw the proper dividing line so that the bouses met the requirements of the set back ordinances for the City of Orono. Mr. Reiling followed the advice of the Building Inspector and obtained the survey and on August 21, 1975, sold that portion of Lots 8 and 9, lying southerly of the proposed dividing line to Ralph L. Halm and his wife, under a Contract for Deed. He continued to show the portion of the property lying northerly of the proposed dividing line and on April 1, 1976, the same was sold to Douglas Johnson. Both sales were made by Contract for Deed, the contract with Mr. Halm being dated Sept. mher 19, 1975, and the contract with Mr. Johnson being dated April 9, 1976. TJiese conveyances were made upon the reliance of the representations of Mr. Scheller that the subdivision .as proposed and laid out by Mr. Coffin was proper. Nothing further was done by Mr. Reiling or suggested to he done by Mr. Reiling. 'Hie matter then laid in abeyance until the sunrner of 1977, whe^n my client received a lettt r rom Halm’s attorney stating that a subdivision had never been approved by the City of Orono, and that Mr. Halm was not going to make any further payments under the terms of the Contract for Deed until approval of the City of Orono was obtained for the subdivision of Lots 8 and 9 Copy of Mr. Halm's attorney's letter is hereto attached as an exhibit. As can he seen by the survey, which is attached as an exhibit, the two lots do in fact contain two hox:ses, one house being entirely on Lot 8, and the other house straddling the lot line betw.-en Lots 8 and 9. Tlie proposed dividing line as laid out by Mr. Coffin meets the set hack require- n,ents of the City of Orono, hut the proposed subdivision fails to meet the area requirement and the width requirement. Tl.e xise of this property is nonconforming, and the allow.ance ot the subdivision will make it confoiming to the extent that there will only he one lOuse on each parcel of land. The granting of the subdivision and request for v.3riance will not increase the degree of land use, since the structures have already been built. hardship to the property occurs hy reason of the fact ‘''f >7'.^ \\ ill I I LOCATION OF Address ■ Aiu Legal Descri APPLICANT Name Bernln Address In the summer oi offered for salt On these two lo attached and pr piece and being division of the Scheller and wa divide and that houses met the followed the ad 1975, sold that Ralph L. Halm a of the property same was sold t with Mr. Halm h dated April 9, of Mr. Scheller Nothing further then laid in at Halm's attornej and that Mr. H? for Deed until Copy of Mr. the survey, one house beinj 8 and 9. The ] ments of the C. and the width : the subdivisioi each parcel of increase the d 'fhe hardship t has allowed tw by Mr. Reiling Vi*a\7*ina fWO 0 t ...................... Lake Landing n County, Mlnnosojta ' 305- a 32810 • 6/^/^-4354_ p^]»or)e) se reiinit ppix)val The property being fi nncsota. ; survey liereto operty as a single - )t to secure a sub- j contacted Michael hat he could s\ib- ie so that the )iono. Mr. Reiling )d on August 21, 1 dividing line to show the portion -il 1, 1976, the Deed, the contract Johnson being !:he representations rfin was proper. Veiling. The matter 3 a letter froni Mr. le City of Orono, terms of the Contract i^ision of Lots 8 and it. As can he seen font a in two houses, ot line between 1-ots e set hack require- the area requireuient and the alltrwance of nly be one house on arianre will not built. [age in time passed ■f- A Ah ? I c. V CIIY OF GROW, MINNESJFA Conditional Use and Variance Application ^ j JL J 6 ' % LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property) Address z,A7n Pnrest Lake Landing 4480 FLY Legal Description Lot 8 and Lot 9, Tonkavicw Cardens \ APPLICANT TYPE OF REQUEST Conditional Use % ^ Variance Wetlands Variance Name Bernhard Reiling 304- Phone ^ 644-4354 Riprap Address 1440 Leeway Drive, Orlando, Florida 32810 f.*3 o Fee offefed'frs'ale Card^irm’nncp^ MinneLtL timicses had been constructed in accordance with the survey hereto On these two lots two Coffin. After attempting to sell the property as a single attached and prepared by Gord ^33 told that he should attempt to secure a sub- piece and being -nd'seli them as separate parcels. Mr. Felling contacted Michael division of the “ since there were two liouscs on the property that he could sub- Scheller and was to wire a surveyor to draw the proper dividing line so that the divide and that he coul ^ w i- v b '.rJimnces for the City of Orono. Mr. Reiling houses met ^Lspector and obtained the survey and on August 21, followed the advice of the southerly of the proposed dividing line to 1975, sold that portion of hots 8 f^ ® ^y ng scnt^^^ y^_^ eontinned to show the portion Ralph L. Halm and his wife, under a Contract , . ,. and on April 1, 1976, the of the property lying northerly of Lde by Contract for Deed, the contract same was sold to Douglas Johnso . - contract with Mr. Johnson being with Mr. Halm being dated September 19, * rpllance of the representations dated April 9, 1976. These conveyances wore ^""S^.iorfin wL proper. of Mr. Schcller that the “ or°suglLted to be done by Mr. Reiling. The matter Nothing further was done by Mr. Reiling ^ gg client received a letter from Mr. then laid in abeyance until the summer of * ^^en approved by the City of Orono, Halm’s attorney stating that a ? paynentrunder the terms of the Contract and that Mr. Halm was to maVe .any fu« subdivision of Lots 8 and for Deed until approval of the ^tty of Oro as an exhibit. As can he seen 9. Copy of Mr. Halm s attorney „,,hibit the two lots do in fact contain two liouses, by the survey, which is straddling the lot line between Lots one house being entirely » laia out bv Mr Coffin meets the set back require- 8 and 9. The proposed dividing line as laid ^ „oet the area requirement ments of the City of Orono, hut the ^ nonconforming, and the allowance of and the width requirement. Ihe use P P o„ly he one house on the subdivision will mAe subdivision and request for variance will not i:freartie°degre^of land use, since the structures have already been built. ■n,e hardship to the p-p‘=-^,°--:„‘>^,is^;:rcfi i’:rt^c::ie;rncrof"rjsrr.:us srMt”re!?irg%rt:na:crur:^ - him having two Contracts for Deeds dlffe P > „jnimal affect of granting OUR •5. S 'er ;ii 4 Oi I ti fa Cc At th un ne As Coi Or< apt not in X\’ai 8, sat the no I a ing pro UDS I 1. thi, DDS: c i ------r I OF REQUEST Miditional Use ariance etlands Variance iprap ae The property being inncsota. survey hereto perty as a single to secure a sub contacted Michael at he could sub- so that the ono. Mr. Reiling on August 21, dividing line to how the portion 1 1, 1976, the )eed, the contract Fohnson being le representations fin was proper, filing. The matter a letter from Mr. e City of Orono, grms of the Contract ision of bots 8 and t. As can be seen contain two houses, t line between l>ots set back require- he .-tea requirement md the allcr,jance of ily be one house on iriance will not built. igc in time passed ance of these units )CCtor, results in inable to fulfill L affect of granting } . \ * % OUR '>.S 'ei OUREY & SMITH // A #*HOrC^ftlONAL Af»^OCIA7lON ATTORNCYS AT LAW IR30 Soo Lir,c H uILOIno MiNNtAPOLIS. Minnciota 5S402 TcicrMONS C612) 33D-044I August 9, 1977 A ssociate C oukkeli ROBERT P. SCHWINN CEOHCC R. KODADEK •••. 1440 L- Orlando, 'd Reiling ' Drive •orida 32810 Dear Mr. Reiling; I have been retained by Mr. and Mrs. Ralph IJalm rela tive to problems they are experiencing because of your failure to secure the approval of the Orono village Council for the subdivision of Lot 8, Tonkaview Gardens. At the time of the closing on the Halm's purchase of their property located at 4470 Forest Lane, it was undeistood by all parties that you would secure the necessary approval of the subdivision. As you are aware, Mr. Halm planned on prepaying the Contract balance. When he chocked with the Village of Orono, he discovered that the subdivision had never been approved and, in fact, v;as advised that it probably would not be approved as it is presently subdivided. We are hereby tendering the balance due on the Contract in the amount of $9,902.62. m return, we expect a Warranty Deed and a fully-approved subdivision of Lot 8, Tonkaview Gardens. Upon receipt of the Deed and satisfactory evidence of the approval of the subdivision, the monies will be forwarded to you. With this tender, no further interest accrues on the Contract For Deed. I am sure that Douglas Johnson, purchaser of the remain- Lot 8, is not aware of the subdivision problems. Certainly if he were aware, he would be as upset, if not more so, than my clients. I look iOLiv'ard to hearing from you shortly regardinq this matter. Sincerely, A COUREY SM'IT. DDS.-bjp GAF<DI 1 9,4 AssOCfikTE COUKsCLi ROBERT P. SCHWINN GEORGE R. KODADEK rela- )f your age Gardens the age of ver been bly would ontract t a f Lot 3nd livision, bender, Deed, remain- L sion )e as 'il.K (Lv'oatsfc. t51^\V\'0>cr DO V\e 0\<2.0'Oe.xbc >) t -Va>' )c5inre.^^ .V\ ^\'otK^ Vo K »• ^1 W IV rr“n •T* •-c c -~ c c r •- —* r * • c V ~ r-» c 5 P.c • •«. >3.>»c c u * ---••k. S r g] £ ^ £ S >»? s ♦J i:r V.5 i tC'r - X • C C w "T’ t *•u i-i -2 IL I r.. Planning Coiiimission § Council Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator 7^- October 13, 1977 Conley Brooks (Peter Fox) - 1125 SprLig Hill Road Subdivision Mr. Brooks is submitting another proposal to si^Jivide one of Jie ^ into tivo parcels (A-1 and A-2). This is a resubdivision of the original subdivision of the entire tract \diich was approved by Council on August 17, 1977. I ra enclosing a copy of the resolution of approval (not certified) of the previous division wh5ch Kas done without the requirements of a final plat (mylar and hardshells). The previous subdivision should be recorded with che County. can deterJnine idietlier a final plat will be required for this Council determines a final plat will lie necessary, tlie standard two step procedure must be folla.'ed (preliminaiy plat approval and final plat approval). Since a final plat was not required with the previous proposal, there is no evidence of casements, one of the conditions listed in the resolution adopted by Council on August 22, 1977. The previous approval was also given subject to a $500 park dedication fee. 'Hiis proposal would require only one more §250 parK dedication fee with tlie addition of only one nore building site. I would like to call to your attention the location of the property line as proposed on this lot split. It appears to be dividing some of the existing access road. The City engineer and attorney might give us some direction on this issue to eliminate any possible future problems with easements and access. We should also consider the description of tiie low land for conservation easements. hhile investigating the site, I saw a structure on the proposed Lot A-1. The location of tliis structure is not indicated on the plat. I have forwarded copies or this proposal along with requests for comments to Jie City Administrator, City Fngineer, City Attorney, City Public horks Director, County Public Works Department and Watershed District. A public hearing has been scheduled for November 7, 1977 at 8:15 p.m. Mti- . U -i > W u ^cr..^ • 'ir Street Location of I I>egal Description of eXfner: 0^ N) t-s b V (Nairiej Type of Rc({uest: Description of Reque Please uraw or attac 3. Indicate North Location on Lo Adjacent Stree Location of se existing bui Distances betw and structur Map or plat showing or the property affe Abstractors or attor he land within 500 f as those names apj^a Petition showing SOI j 9 ; ^ Village iecommendati< parcels (Tract A) iginal subdivision 77. I’m the previous mylar and County. iar and hardshells) ceding 5 acres, dsion of the >n. Tlie Council »sal. If tlie *o step procedure il). lere is no uion adopted by subject to a Dre $250 park ty line as e existing access 1 on this issue ss. rvation easements, ot A-1. The coTiments to Jie ks Director, p.m w ■-,A Mi ■m «;V■ vV : it ■f.- ■>-/ // 0 ! cm OF 0;t)N0, MINNESOTA,.LL k;. J ”ff Street,Location of Property:^ • I>egal Description of Property: __________^ &mer:C0N)nEV - Case No, Fee Date 7 S • • ______________________________________ (Name ressj dl^ (Plione}I Type of Pecjuest:Rezojiing Variance _ .Conditional Use Pennit Subdivision Approval Other > V Description of Request: Ou'v^^^.VT^O XClrtfier) Please draw or attach a sTcetch oT proposed st’nic'ture shaving t)ie following: Dimensions of proposed structure Proposed setbacks Zoninp in force in this area 1. Indicate North ' 2. Location on Lot 3. Adjacent Street Names 4. Location of setback and use of adjacent existing building. 5. ‘ Distances between any proposed structures and stiTJCtures on adjacent property. Exhibit Submitted; Map or plat shaving the property affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boundaries or the property affected by proposed change. Abstractors or attomeys certification listing the names and address of the avners of he land within 500 ft. of tlie ba.indaries of the property requesting the change or rezoning as those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Petition showing 50% of property avners within 300 ft. favoring rezoning or variance. Village jecommendations: n\ c 'im I f ^r-_'2S__ ^ 7 ?-yorV '^TPiroTie) ^ emit val 'j structure area I the boundaries e oivners of ange or rezoning nty. r variance. ij' * * l^,r If A, \I2M. **• * k 5\ \f 1. • <f •, rry oi 5^4:: lu:.'5<^/; v\i \ T \ Imo- : •• V lai - > ^ Cb 10. ?J /> / / X - r' A t ' / f * / 3 f - * - 3 >> Q 6 aJ «. / 4:< ‘^6 ./ / j> t • ? 1 1-^ / /»• **.. • • ■/ M HC554. • •.// ^ ^ \■^Oogy-. NAME O C if' „ _j\]'\AT}A-V< 'Ct^C T Mi'- if. « V 5 >> ‘w < o ^s.j €“> * ^ €N • ^ Ok CK, * s > / .U > I•w.i. 4w-» .■♦ .N I 2» *i / / 9^ rvi KT' 1. ^ / / ^ -N • • :k Ct> > c> >7. n ■\ • « HC55A • *// ^./ ___^ rr^J •* itr v^Oogy- . DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME ADDRESS Sj£XI^\0J^-O3 : ^7' ^ooVe--^yo :P\efc '-W5 v^^LT OVl.Crfe _ iV // ■5'cO3rV:.t0.VxVJV-bm 5\0^.rrtpt <^ ^p\‘o i » O'CO n QD DESCRIPTION GarilVlri S-^JlHo.Ci OS'bH V"?. - JP \3\n a ._^oAi.VOTC!b.^o'o:A_.P o aal ^ CP\at‘a\Ps \CH% lvs>i V.cs^b *0*0 b'o La LOT BLK. ,'3^ Qy^t.XsjrV\\\\ \ •h a. ••**•. : #» •-ae3\ iCC^r vJ. Vbi\; C.O f<^‘- PARCEL •4053 3^00: UDOO Si# « • i< L ;1 .'. . • —.-i RI-SOLl/riON NO. A liESOULTIQN APPROVING A SUBDIVISION FOR CONUIY BROOKS WIERllAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and 1\^{1:RI1^S, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within tlie City; and V.10:W-AS, the City Council Kas considered the application for a sub division by Conley Brooks; NOW, TUHRI-FORE, BE IT W-SOLWD, that the City Coimcil of the City of Orono hereby approves tlie division of part of Govt, hot 2, 5xJCtion 26-118-23, Knoun as 38-41326-4010, subject to the following: 1. AllAll necessary easements; sjx^cifically, adequate utility easement running parallel with Sj>ring Hill Road. 2. Park Dedication Fee in the amtaimt of $500.00. 3. Title opinion addressed to the City. 'fhis resolution icill expire March 1, 1978, if the aforesaid subdivision plat has not been filed with the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office. In that event, it will l>e necessary to file a new' application with tlie City of Orono for subdivision approval. Dated this day of 1977. William B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: Walter R. Benson, Clerk/Administrator ¥,3 \ I y 5 TA TE < .•^7 T A • / / -f • KS mi zed and d subdivision within tlie for a sub file City of 26-118-23, id subdivision . In that event, Dno for subdivision ?st, Mayor k PL/ir OF SURVEY FOR CONLEY BROOKS IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 26-118-23 STATE AID^y ••c/r r * r/» scale •• / !NCH= too FEET DATE 6-9-77 i 0»% J/Ij »/* 4 *9 GORDON R. COf LAND SURVErOR fl Pi LONG LAKE, MINNESO .# o 2 /w? T A ■ / I f< i ‘ *»„ •*</te* .jmJ A */4 A Z » ■?. *' J* /»y/, / *4 ' '•■••• »: J.0?i • 7 e "/ I• • r f / ^ ^ V V ! 1-4 ^<9*% Ut}0 long L A KE DATE: SUBJECT: b V: Zoning distr; from the side The main pori of way with 2 ing side yarc ^f^. Butterfic (family and i to the front interfere wil ivould be the non-confonnii further than result in a j Tlie proposal requirement £ Enclosed is £ for variance ! i€^ isting road and 50 ft. i5 street right 50. The exist- d addition er and stoop ivould not north. Tliis e existing from the street tion would B side setback our policy Brmits. jiX.^.■ . 'a '■;> 1 f/ ' /c' '.X/. O' . I ern OF ORCNO, mNNESOTA Conditional Use and Variance Application Jf LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Cor property) _ 'TYPE OF REQUEST -rv. Legal Description APPLI _____Phone,# 7^Fee A-/OJjv &Phoi)9 if ^9/^'P^ Address K%'~/ </^__ Present Zoning \ N 1) '* ’ ^ Present Use HcS « Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 3y. 9V2L Conditional Use X Variance Wetlands Variance Riprap FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Council Action Date Approved Denied \SX4^~56cify Ordinance Requirements-J^ Explain Request Relative to Requireirients ^-pu £AiSr//VG 5xd gr _$;gro/^c / <g^rg^>cv<C^ ADDIT/Oh/ C PAMfLV HeaM') TO A/aA/-CO^A^PMt^S_?£ TB^C6fS Extent of Non-conformity ^kJb / C^C^htT S'^TRACIC Hardships to Property (Your reascais for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit F/^OA/T 9^ OA/ ^ac/S6 ---- r,ntJPo/^H - ?F^FO b APP/nOA/ /S C6Ay7/A/UAr/oA/ €>F_ FYffT//0& A/A/£^ ^//O FO/^T(iEfi __T^‘^M MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR CONPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) t- 1, Afplication conpleted 2. Plat Ilap Section 3. Survey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Certified Property Osner’s List of owners Avithin (300 ft.) (150 ft.) from Hennepin Cainty Registi-ar of Deeds 5. $30.00 Fee ZUl '7. > ;.. A t ^ //of :>»-tr'ta’irst l/.. (i'il O * •. */I V iu - •-’1 f:?*t .;*.;?t of ^ .-. -> r* •V r ''1 S -. Vi r.c’iv' < r,> • 'f-.'.l ‘:. C". ^•.r't.’ : •■: of 1* *V • • 1. •-^ r*> * r 1 ^ ' C '..*.h ^'r t V.C * V'L ’ M' . 1' ‘ I •-■ ■ r-1:-V - -' vr r • ‘ :v •t; •■-•'.. ♦ ' '> ^ •.' • -t I., t ♦ ^ * -.1 i w • . : «:* ' :.. « 4 • ♦k *. .* • ' •/ .,. ; *.t . . ' ' > ‘ J • :.;4 • . •* -i • < t ^ * 1 * - • , - '• • '* • \ ^.-r ' • * # ■^ * «> •' V * 4 • • p- • ' f 1 ^. *• .V - ^ • • . w. cribifd ncy n n ijoiix L'-.v-Gt 1/4; -•’*11”.*' to ' f ' . i « ♦:>v' • * • . .* w • • • •. ' ^ : • i r; Cv * r /1‘ ’•■W',* •. t ^ \ • m 1. % il-2^'f-i* =* •' !?;•> .L- ►<C /« departkent of finance A-603 government CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5S487 t3 O u ■) W ^ PROPERTY OWNERS LIST O'oo'oo NAME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION LOT ,p(2£^\DO OQ(]j - \\ T C9\c^P P K'^OVSj'bO'O 1 s I ?.9i* OaJ^- iT._, SeiLV:\0D G d\-l\'br O' r X)oo(aWoC,\X € W:k- 'A \V J 7 S' _____ _.. _ IHa ^D £iecVL\ o o ._P CPv^t 4^\A V.:>L ^-^T3 5t7 '‘T 5*7 i^iVuS 7 V na -'T V.d L a >b.\Ao.ao.^^ ■ \ >. pi s ^sV(?7 .H a/4 I___rr^Jv__V|6»__ BLK. PARCEL___ lOGOi lOTQ b‘ ^ T' ooO j (i ^ A L.Oj [(dA a.O g£oO C£i/.<5 iCD •ihi—i i ■« ■A [if i '5 terfidd s ' « I f nncdy ? TO:PI. FROM:I la DATE:Oc SUBJECT:Ra- Va ^ 'Vi,a li. 81I£ I^J0) iu.o av.d N .' C '\Ac i A c«\ rl 10) \ \ LiiArii/'c jr/'Tun Ac % \ ti M ff A ‘ > ii yj&v :.yvm ¥m i*v: a l-A:? 4*^ I Planning Coinmission 5 Council FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Hank Nfuhich, Zoning Administrator October 13, 1977 Raymond '•Mike” Molde - 1428 Baldur Park Road Variance - Lot Area § Width and Lakeshore § Side Yard Setback on Existing Non-Confoming Lot and House This district is zoned as follov.’s: Area - 1/2 acre (21,780 sq. ft.)t Width - 100 ft.. Lake .Setback - 75 ft.. Side Setback - 10 ft. Mr. Ifolde is requesting approval to construct a second story exj^insion on his existing residence which is currently non-conforming in lot area width and lake and side setbacks. The following variances would be necessary for approval: Area - approximately 13,000 sq. ft. Width - 50 ft. Lake Setback - 13 ft. Side Setback - 2.1 ft. This proposal would not increase the existing hardcover area or percentage. The enclosed survey indicates the location with no increase in house area. The enclosed sketch for hour expansion indicates the second story only with a 20 ft. height limit. I see no problem here, but we might consider applicant’s obtaining letter of no objection from immediate neighbor. .f** ' Ll - PV' 't-N ~:a4 « li .V" LOCATICN OF Address Legal Descri APPLIOOT Name 'R/ Address /<f-2 a\'NER Name Address Present Zonii Zoning Ordin? Specify Ordir Explain Reque £XI^T//J Extent of Non LoT - Hardships to 1. Applicatl \ 2. Plat Map ; ) 3. Suivey (S Cate tback on ), Width - 100 Lon on his ith and lake :entage. The ?a. The enclosed ft. height Letter of no r' fc A V % S' N ! /'i \, ■■ CHY OF ORCNO, MINKE90TA Conditional Use and Variance ^plication LOCATION OP PROPOSAL (or property) Address |4^& ^I^ArpOi^ A ^ ^ w/y. /h A . Legal Description U oT 8 . ICC ir. /___________ 'T^ . . V . A M! -4, O it APPLicAvr io A-i- b Of\ Naine ^/A'^//A6/00 Phone # 47/*'7(X?4 Address Pr^ of. nU^Sl f] t S39.’2h'CJ yivS TYPE OF REQUEST Conditional Use Variance Wetlands Variance Riprap '-pji y av'NER Name_ Address A /I P(>L 1C Phone #FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Council Action Date Present Zoning Lfi."fd.Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements /fipf-,, ^CfC. y>'’rt Approved Denied /d^’/y /'Y /(9-y '/P, AvD AExplain Request Relative to Rec]uirements f-iA '■ <2- [\ ^C^ 9 11) A*~ V'i' £x 1<^ Tfh ^ //^ // Pt" /O r v Extent of NOTi“Conforndty/.y/H £ jkirf c♦ /<y< ^ ^ L~oT A^i A "/IFP^ojr I'^o^yQ AT —- LiT ^___________________ Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR CON1PI.ETE APPLICATION (Mist be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting)/■ If f t c: v /i . i I t » * Application conpleted Plat Map Section Suiyey (Sketch in proposal) \4.Certified Property O^Tier^s List of a\Tiers withiiiJt^^Kirafesf)-(150 ft.) - from Henaiepin Cainty Registrar of Deeds $30.00 Fee A. Date OdT % 1^71 _______Signature lvl)Kl h^-Q 1 ' o: i 4 OF RECAST ditional Use “lance lands Variance FFICLAL USE ONLY imcil Action -/ /(-y ^ ^ CO M h ~ 5// iitional Use Permit aer^s List of r)-(150 ft.) - Registrar of f f r \ 2 7?0.-tG/C<. ■S f * f /■'/I fv/. ^ 77 6 V------ - ^ U «l ■1^ ►<Cb54 • • Tl\'ST 3S ^ I NAME . 1 Giji^DO'J lu. !£> __e.'L/£BELrr E e .tieyS-A-tiCKt P,AV hAQtJP >\0I SJAWLO' Sok .c Bjg..-G^Ace_ J.C., VJLK\J._ _LLoyO M. .iVER-EIX- GcoC M-EVA-X JWlU _j_& vv\E§_ _i§.,_PET _TbfeUC Accooio R,^i.V>AOKj[i \J'\0 * t N'i, >'~-'v r<’~-*- J ■ i ^ '\ V / ■'•‘ 4 -' ,W 3 \‘ k 11*^ ■ WC554 • • DEPARTI€NT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 £• 9. Q. ''7 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST TT\'iT 38 NAME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION LOT RfxuDUR PAF.K De: Ro'i.vA.... _<2a3flt)OLj, UJ.- TC iKXE ELU^ A-\(EwR'/._ tlCKT- _ bay TAOfJD_.Isolde _S tawlo ! s oi|j _E)jB...&ALe_.-...... „ J- C. ULUU LLoy CL_\i.. B' tJTE .£y.£gJvTX^-GcoOPEU _M £VA-X_-NMLLS _A.J.._ACf<EE|v\AWN^ ^iv.es vJ Id. 5'S3 ‘)/ IV<4o ‘^icfu^T^^k L*JCUii 1)1 H 5s 5^'' UfAtuic. ^5"2-0 /Tchatpin U»b i-. K4/«A« 'V32. lii -i^+K . jm ^ ^ ! /•/zf ■R a IJu -t T’A-rk E.J CronB ^ Sa> »>tn. SViOj 50 ^>7 - So . ^ pis ■ n ^ 5 *7/ 7 (t/Al for 12. me #- 2</0 '?U',5<.1/ tWix iO A-c^ A-+1- ^ Hi *v 5 5"^ “^Z ^5/c r}®*- (?rc\'.A . /Vl rv. bV'?>0/ Le-rc-u 1^2© AZ o (?I.AT K)Q. AtSE^o'i UIa-»^^*L ^ Mi, ^5-9 5^ rciz u/ S5*36 ^'^>'•TT5ko^«. ^ ^a 55 3>^/ S5y<? no-^'TL«r^ or fh/i 5''^ 5^/ F^iO- Spir\<ll<^ \ T\j6LlC /^COOWjnoG SERV. luc lG,l9,EO'2_T 'f'?:Z. 4- Eavvaom D MoUDi BLK. PARCEL OE£)0 0600 01OQ- 0^00-. 7. Nzf Bi-fL R jL CPrcjWA , »l>j 5i"3i(Lore, n AuA 18 1 certify t^»at the fects • _,^»c-.eoieo on this certificate are an r.c'.ur te and true rtpresentatian of P'Lw.nT*. tion as it appears this date o* fi? records of the Henn. Co. ftfra -ce rv..- ►■vaci i-»i mv kllOV»»CURt? E- O^OO-. \ OOQ 11 00 woo.-H 1500 66Z"E 3'aoc>_^ 390GJ A(xid ^^ooj, >4^ ^A-koa. \Ai' TO:PI FROM:IL DATC: SUBJECT: D V Zoning distr 100 ft., Sid Existing sit Area - Width - Street Side Se Surv'ey are e Mr. Stubbs : 81 ft. from 132 sq. ft. would be a < 4 ft. furtlu requesting ’ Enclosed is applicatioa ■^r-W r 'i ->•• Jl PTION >(z>0^ 4- LOT BLK.PARCEL OGOO O&OCL-,, OlOQ_ 0800_i p^on.j f I OOQ„ _i\ QQJ loOQ 1500 /bQL^^ Z \ _ 3e<%L. 33 QG c_‘AQaCL\ t ,. 7- Afeoo PI; o ri'=v; '^ .ssG V r^-^>7 «l J i €j OPlanning Commission ^ Council Hank h^nch, Zoning .Administrator October 13, 1977 House Addition to P.isting Non- Conforming Lot Area ^ House Location 4.^. ^v7^a - 'lore Width - 300 ft., Street Setback -Zoning district requirements. Aica b acre, i.iaen 100 ft., Side Setback - 50 ft. Existing situation as indicated on sui-vey: Area - Sliglitly larger than 1 acre Width - 513 ft. , , Street Setback - Approxupately 19 it. Su?t-e^Ssf indiLte^ Jha?'the eaves of slied on neighboring parcel are extending over Mr. Stubbs* property line. would be a continuation of the front ervtivi^-V of 18 ft 4 in V’e might consider Enclosed is a copy of a survey submitted by Mr. Stubbs as is our policy foi variance applications and requirement for issuing of building permi s. iH»ii iiim»»wwiii cm OF ORCNO, MINKH90TA Cc^ditional Use and Variance Application r LOC^TICN OP PROPOSAL (or property) M ^ - I! 5"^ <?■ •t. -r H ff e„J>I '-r > if*' TYPE OF REQUEST Address Cl'm c 12..A ou ~Vr[ ‘ Legal Description APPLICANT Najne 7>Al'/J) 1>n/BPS Phone # Address ^Jl. T/f O'A'NER Name ~l>h i'' i 7> W * S Phone # Address /cr^ sy^y/ Present Zoning R/^~IA - f>/4 (T/Of Present Use //£.^ , Zoiiing Ordinance Section Re3a.ting to Request 7^/ Specify Ordinance Requiremants S * A a a ^ o s / r i ;a r ' t A fill A__5 file <> Conditional Use V^Variance Wetlands Variance Riprap ,Ci?n/’Fee//7. '.l-t FOR OFFICIAL USE (M.Y Council Action Date Approved Danied / / V .«✓ /" zyy CC'/Ar/y - Explain Request Relative to Requirements /rr c l'/'y A. Acr>/:,'TrTAnAf Tap S> C/Cif" y .yf O /f ^ / S r/k? ^ P i\ / -L C , L' c rA cA y Extent of Non-confoimity / c4 /! /?w r <^o/ A / .5^ Hardships to Property (Your reascsis for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit hx! • J-/j. fit/'AV "tt / Ay^' f 7 7)---------------------------*—'7----- (// 1. 2. 3. •; MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR OC^IPLETE APPLICATICW *, (Must be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) Application conpleted n/4. Certified Property Owner’s List of Plat Map Section ovsners within (300 ft.) (150 ft.) Sui^y (Sketch in proposal) from Hennepin County Registrar of Deeds $30.00 Fee Date Signature It ^mmmw'e Whfcu *^- J* -'.'.j^-- •..- ... • ' V'-T*'' - •.«!. • -*••;•■ ,,.' .'4 ^ 5ps;?^ ^ '%«ea:.;-A.-vj... .■ .- ■■. ,V,•;. - -V* •. . -3 ■■'•.. r-m -'V- '.■ .1. •^ .... ... <4 #9^. W*»fJi| utrnvr 'iik j S«» Jt*if0*ff > 'v; .:, V rr^; ,.,. .r- V -• '.'>:;^28 |A/ll :- A !..• A K '■''ri * •' ■^‘''- ff‘i I •imufi c«n44ftifiC ¥rc^ ^cl r.?T-V^/-.>. .y. ■ ■ V . ‘■•a'a . o ■sSsmyamn ?Lit of Surrey for IXivic !.'• Stubl»8 In the Southwest 1/4 of Section 3--U--23 1 -•'i w.. I .-Ifil ' Wi • V ■ ••''•. V I y\ J'r/■Vv Aaust ‘■n ProL \ if >:Jri >.•■ ? ,. ■ - I •..•-.• • H»* -• . ■» - •=•«...■’■ •V <v .■'\v ■•*> .; « *’ y^A:-rt,AAJv ISf'^ Certificate of Survey: ! I hereby certify th^t this Ir a true and correct repre;,urtcitlon of a curvey of the boundaries of that ;&rt of the Northwest quar*» ^1 ter of the l?o'.:thvie&t cu-irter of Section 3^» Tbwn» 6hlo lit Korth, ioinge 23 Vast of the 5tii ihrircitjaX v^*rluiur.j coccribec ls fcllovs: ^finnln^ on the West line thereof Lt a point ciisV-rt 3U.6 feet South of the V.ast .*;’..:irtrr post of r.-il 1 secti.on, wuich .ooint ir in th“ Sriil’n line of Ccunty Rond T.'o, 45 (*); thenco Sc.ith 574 A ^ A O A A • ^ • •«« ^ 9 __ A. ■ A’C'^ii'A' A- ...; feet; thence iiZrist and parallel with ^le Rast and West : Ip;...IpiiiWt'Aia a.;a *-^i " -, .'■ ■. ■ ' 'r'- ■* ■'.’h. ■■? •- mm feA7«iii ■Mii ‘vViv;;-v: K Vi. "' “ qirartejCi^^ine of suii. section a distance of 100,51 feet} tnence^rth and f.arallel vith the west secti n line a dlctunce of 284 *'*eet; tivince TCorthcasterd..* 14^.4 feet to b lioint in the South line of County itoad Tr. 41, which point is 313 feet &Ioi*t, suid South line fren. the point of bejfir.nin£ (*^)> th'.-rce ’Northwesterly alon,* ssid South line (»; 313 feat to ricint of teflnnlnc, vr.6 the locetioa of all existsrp builcints thereon. Tliis description it defective in that references tc the South line of County hoed U . 45 apparently refsr to the centerline of said road; tharefow this survey ie intended to show only exlotinfc rx>nu:aentation as set previously by others, and lints of 0. cupatloR in relation to one possible IrAerpreta* tier of tre abo*e description. Any further certification is exoressl,' resei^’ed until the description is clarified. The niat ocas not purport to show oth^-r inprovements or encrcaclutwnts. •flii-.'-.A? m:{: i fd.. ■■>‘m .aON:.. • j,|C •V V A *3.- A.i- ..k Scale I mte : I t lA3:.»SiaPS.3 m Av; ;A If--mmm mmmmmm A.'.a.;v :. I” = 100« 9-27-77 Irtn narker fc<iri Iron narker set i-f Gordon h, Coffin 6064 iwind Surve..or arji .®1 i^ke, ^Annescta mm £1^ :.■ -T -i- ■■ . : \ -L* 4» J r rJ % / '' M 'S-^/ \ / nr ,/ ^ W' , .ic/.rt .:.’ :.co :^v tr. V'’h _«H ♦ r: : . i* • ' - - '''- . ..;, V iv:. ^ v«'•out ••’"u *-ric'<” . tier. iei^cri ■ tic I'l ;e .. -■ •=' ■> r-*' ru: - t : ‘ '’.r'l.- c r.ly I ctr-.-rr, ui.Q c?sit'-.r ir.l T- rrf r.o r ^ o j. .. i. n iii. c 1.^*1 . i'^.01*3''tr * •. n *-? .} ■■■ t i.V4 « fc*-* » ' r • JU V. f. ;-V. -//// ir li S •• X / fj}tfL^ Pi- Pi^y P J ?r/ ,/,/. * ■! o f 4f^j I . •' ES4\t-i6 ______ ___— 'a/ "*= /•^‘- ji-.- • 4.V-X y- 1 rlT'^ •*. '} nnedy 5 V.: 8in -)dvid N S/iibM ; 5c'>lc r? iSOO) Hjrtnun * ,0 4c c? \ Z* </• ^1 : ’!• 1>«(N W HC554 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST u. ^ J Cl Q r)\<;T •?f O O NAME ADDRESS __ODUGJLAS.__.He. I ^ .ERRG k) DoRU I ^ ^ ^ ^ ‘ ^ ^ 7 £ £ r <9 i-i-‘^ _D£LB£R.T_F WU-Sl'.vJ_«^f'< J s ^Ht(: Rre Z P ip ..STtPiACN) D- TTaoLfl ^rsi ii Tf Z - ^ «?XT yj LoREkl 'E^\JTTEKfl^LDp^'i<y<i: /'ydi7 77^ ,'^/J- ' <5" pe-AjK't-S it J . <5 M-i"'A, Ujt^LEy. I_ _ < T -KoSEfeT Tf^VLOK__I _DC.V10 U STuSg^ sv k K- DESCRIPTION _31 -_W8-G3. (pi.yrr MO 4A33lb LOT *52.- US g Zd (p^Ai .kio ••5 ’. O. STPS^_________ I certify that the facts represented on this certificate arc an accurate and true representation of informa tion as it appears this date on the records of the Henn. Co. Finance Orv., to Inc best of my knoAicuge and belief. Henn. Co. Division ; OBtd2_£^£22 BLK.PARCEL IDQQ 4Goo 4800... Z400 3Q1.Q_ 4200.. .4000.. 4500_ '4 H r 41 f m TO: FRai: DATE: SUBJECT: Mr. Dom i; on his resi could dctci nents. He sketch. TI actunl vari Tlie zoning front sethc From the sT certified. If the i^roj his sketch, location ol setback. I explainec enclosed sT permit as i certified s Two other i up for vari as I requer Hankinson c survey to c ION LOT BLK. — —— ----------------—------------ -— ----------------- — ...-------------— —-—— -— ---------- -- ------- — —-------------- —----------------------------------—■' ------------——-------------- ---------------------— -------------------■ ---------------------------------------------- . —-------- - 1 —------------ ...------------- . —---------- - . - — - ^— —--------- •.......—- ---------------- . - -.......-.......-------------------- PARCEL f I Planning Conmission 5 Council Hank IMiich, Zoning Acbiinistrator October 13, 1977 ILo./ 77 Q 6'1) (f Earl Dom - 4045 WatertoisTi Road Variance - Front Setback - Area and Side Setback Undetermined Mr. Dom is requesting a building permit to construct a detached 24' x 24* garage on liis residential property, I informed him that a sun^ey \<ns required before we could detennine whetlier his projxDsal would comply with the current zoning require ments. He felt this v.asn’t necessary. He has substituted the enclosed i)ro[«rty sketch. Tlie dimensions as noted, I believe, are estimates so we cannot deternine actual Vciri.'inces that might be necessary. The zoning requirenents in tliis district are: Area - 5 acres, width - iOO ft. front setback - 100 ft., side setback - 50 ft. From the sketch submitted, there is no way to confirm dimensions as they are not certified. Tlierefore, I cannot determine the extent of variances necessary. If the property consists of 5 acres, an area variance would not be required. From his sketch, it appears the lot is 50 ft. short of required width. Tlie proposed location of the garage would require a 25 ft. variance from the necessary 100 ft. setback. I explained to Mr. Dom tliat \<e could process the variance request based on the enclosed sketch. However, a sur\’ey would be required for issuing a building permit as staff would be unable to confirm location without at least a partial certified survey of the front portion of his property. T^vo other property owners located slightly east of the Dom property are also up for variance consideration at this same meeting. Both Ivive submitted surveys as I requested. Ke could process this application in the same irrmner as Mr. Hankinson on Caman Road arxl include tlie condition of applicant's submitting survey to confirm location. ■ % LOCATiaN OF Address Vc Legal Descr APPLICANT Name Address '/c a\'NER N? Address Present Zon Zoning Ordi Specify Ord S//P/-- Explain Req l-f^CNT .5At T c ^ y; Extent of N Hardships t Ai ^ A T ! c /V aahd r>Pi p>r > / 7 1. 2. 3. Applies Plat Mr Suivey Date /C “I V 6'1) <L ned X 24* garage ed lx?fore we ning require ed i)ropcrty ot determine - 500 ft. hey are not essary. ijuired. From e proposed sary 100 ft. sed on the uilding a partial are also ;ted surv'eys • as Mr. fitting f %■ m '■*... u'' -i Ocm OF ORCNO, MINNESOTA f ^ o' Cc-nditional Use and Variance Applicatil^'jf i' O A LOCMIQN OP PROPOSAL (or property) Address /tX-.! =^-5/ Legal Description ijLoc APPLICANT Name '3R 3. /K-Phone # ^ Address '/ 0 /c'^c.J as'NER N?tT! .£'/?/i'Z A-Phone # 933' 3 ! Address 4^^ 3^ l3,i,(: .. ^ - ,9^%Present Zoning PR - fA_ _ _ _ _Present Use Pil5 Zoninc Ordinance Section Relating to Request 3^^. _ TYPE OF REQ^ST Conditional Use X Variance Wetlands Variance Riprap ?c> FOR OFFICIAL (M.Y Council Action Date Approved Denied Speciiy Ordinance Requireironts r3^>c/jX 'j^X.T.SA C--------—------------------ £/Of: ''_____IC cATt'P __/p /- S//Pc/{^^ Explain Request Relative to Requirements 3m - < T —'/-r •/ Extent o£ Non-conformity Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit A s^AT.'C A' f\‘J 0 Uc 5 T /: P C t ^ 5 r //>' ' T V W/ r H A A h O PpCLt/^'B^ t f\ \\'ct>T SiOc Cr p I L / A'6 CAt7AAc —k.’ ^r /i r iH i.:>£ s>^ f ^ -’A'-t' p irp/cuAf \vcci.p p.^s'i^cy /? /2-iA.^r Cf fHt 0> C PQJ^ QQ,,pLgT^ /^p Q»tist be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) 1, Application completed 2. Plat Map Section ' 3. Suxvey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Certified Prq>erty Omer*s List of owners within {500 ft.) (150 ft.) - from Hennepin County Registrar of Deeds 'i H'i>-3 2"? / - h'-'-5. $30.00 Fee :>i :> n Date iCf- 7 " 7 ? jf ' ^-y}Signature c*-n> ^ M %J O'rf'e&Vi.^ ^ Si DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVF-RNKENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST ADDRESS 2S£^jO'CliV~r \a \\ 1/^ d\(c<-y m’ ^ \\K V-^ ’ \'jo tv\ ^i>?0 ^|^.p co, n\. vS\ ys^'->1/ H V ,\Aoe\Wj ^fu i\n\orvo V\nl »00Vu^5: jT3 s:^IL- \vine,v V^. U):d.r^rji Ai t 'h ^ ‘^^• ^ryzv ya.fcrTa<.'+ ?cs ICtetel'^'V, Vi.VI A‘S0'0> \ t*-> ^‘-;5.5-; ---. " A v\ 1 . V tt\iLx:i^u-'t'L'y.- R.A k. :Ty33'^ PROM: DATT:: SniUHCT: lliis rc(|ucsi Hiis propose the area. 'Flic cngincei Citv will hr # proposal. nances. Hank 'Iiiliich was prepare* he infonned would have ‘ Tlie engince: and the arc; total area, submitted si Copies of tl City AttoiTi* A public he; PLANNING Cai Engineer from pub 2 acre p several ; years agi marshlan' collecto The Zoning A plat to tlie coirments. A Planning Com sites on son some of the Planning Coir from the Hen necessary re in tlie proce proposal. ST.UT - Octo Letter to Hen f' *^ ' -/- f ^ TO: PROM: I'l.'inning Coianission ;ind Council IX o A AJJL '■< !■; |j r ^// LI A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Adninistrator DATE:Scntcnbcr 12, 1977 SCaiHCT:Col pepper Land Co. (N’esliuid) Subdivision (Preliminary) - 40 North Orono Orcliard Road lliis request is a revision of previous requests for division of tliis projxjrty. lliis proposal includes 17 2-acrc lots consistent witli tlie zoning requirements for the area. 'Die engineer for this project is 'foCombs-lonitson Associates wliich means that the Citv will have to retain an in<lependent engineer for review of the subdivision^ proposal, 'lliis cost will be allo«zated to the developer as required by our ordi- n.ances. Hank 'tuliich asked Council if there might be a problem with this proposal as it was prepared by our engineering firm. After Dick P-enson talked with Mr. Knutson, he informed me it would be acceptable because it was understood that the City would have to consult soir.e otlier engineer for review' of tlie proixisal. Tlie engineer has been requested to submit a chart showing the total project area, and the area designated as wetlands. In addition, each lot w'ill be listed with total area, dr>' buildable area, and wetland area and soils information will be submitted showing the suitability for on-site septic systems. Copies of this application have been sent to Hennepin Coimty, V.atershed District, City Attorney, Burlington Luce Line ('XiR) and State Highway Department. A public hearing has been scheduled for October 3, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. PLANNING CaMISSlCN MEETING - October 3, 1977 Engineer Ron Bastyr presented revised preliminary subdivision proposal . No coments from public in attendance. Zoning Administrator informed Commission this was revised 2 acre proposal of the previous 1 acre subdivision proposal denied by Council several years ago. Reports resulting from re\’iew of the previous proposal several years ago revealed potential problems with development of steep grades, filling of marshland, problems with on-site disposal systems and traffic liazards from inadequate collector streets. The Zoning Administrator also informed Conmission he had sent copies of the proposed plat to ^le State Highway Department along with a letter requesting review and coiments. As yet he had received no response. Planning Coiwoission was concerned about the problems that might result from home sites on some of the existing steep grades. Also concerned about the filling of some of the wetland areas for the road system as indicated on the proposed plat. Planning Commission directed Staff to request a soils map and report of the property from the Hennepin County Soils Conserwation District. Tabled the request until all necessary reports have been received. Mr. Bastry was informed tliat the City was now in the process of appointing another engineering firm to review and rei>ort on said proposal. STAFF - October 6, 1977 Letter to Hennepin County Soils Consen’ation District requesting soils map and report. Colpcpper Land O Sul^di vision STAFF - October I’m enclosing a < from the Minnehal STAFF - October ; I’m enclosing a ( Transportation rc Mf Colpcppcr Land Co. (Meshuid) Sulidivision i Road this proix^rty. g requirements for :h means that the the subdivision ired bv our ordi- proposal as it with Mr. Knutson, tl'.at tlie City ixDsal. total project area, 1 be listed with nnation will be atershed District, lartment. )0 p.m. roposal . No coiments ssion this was revised Led by Council IS proposal se\^ral grades, filling of azards from inadequate opies of the proposed ting re\dew and result from home ut the filling of he proposed plat. eport of the property he request until all tiiat the City was now and re^wirt on said J4. (5”^^d: . STAFF - October 7, 1977 I*m enclosing a copy of the rc]X)rt on this subdivision j)roiX)sal which I just received from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. STAFF - October 12, 1a77 I'm enclosing a copy of the report I just received from the State DepartJiHjnt of Transportation regarding proposed subdivision. soils nap and report. just received tnient of Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone _296 “3.008--- October 6, 1977 a // iri) iji Mr. Henry F. Muhich Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.E. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota .-) f-,>. j - i : V.; .*. • V. w *V1 :. 0.1 V. > i.r^ 55323 In reply refer to: 315 S.P. 2713 T.H. 12 Plat review of Orono Onks located between Orono Orchard Road, The B.N. R.R. and the Luce Line Trail in part of the S.W. Quarter, Section 35, Township 118, Range 23 in City of Orono Hennepin County Dear Mr. Muhich: We are in receipt of Che 5jg“ytes^505 02'^and 505.03 Plats rv^r^Ar/orarf :::r::".e s: ::t.e„t of --portation^,.. ITI llllXl Te pres^Lt would pass through the mxddle of the schedule for its construc- tiine. Che project is not prograraned and there transportation plan which, cion. The Department is currently preparing the when it is completed next July, may give some indication as to whether project will be given further consideration. He are not now in a position to determine a preferred alignment He would not anticipate location approval be however, that the ci- s^rLHirLd^crit^rtLc nj -j-°rer;^o"mralu^ rur:?^:?t^:oiL5t^rv^rpn/iui£| would seem that that corridor would then be consicierea aj> p when and if a location is selected in the future. ylri Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Henr 4 October Page 2 We regre have no : designati or E. R. Sincerel’ 40 William ( Assistant Field Opc cc: Johi Meti Ga r) Henr Phon. ^0^-1008- - - t 'V cowo E September 15 35.03 Plats rias proposed reliminary new TH 12 the present its construc- on plan which* ether the Dr new TH 12. ito the 1980*s , that the this vicinity ake a success- guide, it contender Mr. Henry F. Muhich October G, 1977 Page 2 We regret that the Department cannot be of more assistance in this matter. We have no further comment as this plat is not in the proximity of an existing or designated trunk highway. If you have any questions, please contact J. S. Katz or E. R. Green at our district office in Golden Valley, 545-3761. Sincerely, William C, Merritt Assistant Commissioner Field Operations Division cc: John Boland Metropolitan Council Gary Backer Hennepin County Surveyor’s Office til- IVlirdl\!EE«-1AE3A VxmTmsum OE^J^.'EK OSSTE'^JCT UKE MINNETONKA P.O. Box 387, Wayzala, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGIRS: D*vid H. Cochnn. Pres. • H. Dale Palmatier • Altcrt 1. Lehman • James S. Russell • Jean Williams V-.*'*:**. •T».wrr*ii"»4»w-uv5.Jl- v*-JK ’-WW.*. It J \ Oc tober 5, 19 ’7 IJ / j ' J .iij V11.LAGS OB OROHaMr. H. F. Muhich, Zoning Adminstrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Colpepper Land Company 40 Orono Orchard Road North Subdivision (Preliminary) Dear Mr. Muhich: I have reviewed the information you sent by letter of September 15, 1977 regarding the subject subdivision. It is not clear from this data what the proposed desig nated wetlands area would be. In our evaluation of the Previous proposal for this area by Centurion Company and Cheyenne Land Company in 1974 the two major wetland areas Cin Lots 1, 2 and 6, Block 2 and in Lots 4 and 5, Block 3) were to be preserved and we found this to be adequate with certain conditions. The current plat appears to delete one of these wetlands and would, therefore, be undesirable in our opinion for lack of flood storage and filtration capacity in spite of the reduction in number of lots proposed relative to the 1974 plat. Regarding on—site sewage disposal, our soils map shows this to*be generally an unfavorable area. Percolation tests would, of course, have to precede any specific installation but it would be helpful to conduct these as early as possible to determine whether some other alternative to on—site dis posal would be advisable. r -1 OilOi'iCI •9 “ he and Lrcas )ck late inds :or :e of the (7S this 5tS Llation possible te dis- A A* * A » m -- - - - - - - - -^ JAH/cml Enclosure cc: D. Cochran - MCWD Mr. H. F. Muhich, Zoning Administrator October 5, 1977 Page Two Enclosed is our prior evaluation of this property, can be of further assistance please call. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District If we If we February 12, 1974 Mr. Dexter Marstor. ' / ling Administrator City of Orono P. 0. Box 66, Crystvil Bay Orono, Minnesota 55323 Re: Cheyenne Land Company Subdivision Sketch D Dear Mr. Marston: • • • . We have reviewed the subject project sent under cover of your letter of January 25, 1974. The wetlands average shown in the sketch appears to be accurate. The apparent difference in wetlands area be tween the developer’s plat and our report can be accounted for by including the narsh area nortli of the Burlington- Northern Railroad tracks. Vie would assess the plan to be adequate in public acreage for flood storage providing such areas be dedicated per manently v/ith allowance . for sufficient rise in ponding level and that allowances be made for a hydraulic connec tion between the two wetlands parcels. Sincerely, MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT John A. Holnquist JAH/pah .«. mmm ', > Mr. Jim Ande; Hennepin Coiu 250 N. Centn Wayzata, iHm Dear Jim: I am enclosiJ along with a Please review soils map anc review of so: with on-site h’e in Orono i this issue. Sincerely, Henp^ F. Ifiih Zoning Admin HH4: be Enclosure :i! r cover of rs to be area be- oe accounted arlington- Lic acreage cated per- ponding lie connec- TclcpVione 473-7357 CITY of ORON Post Office Box C>6* Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 6, 1977 fi t \ ?*lr. Jim Anderson Hennepin County Soil ^ Kater Consen'ation District 250 N. Central V’ayzata, Minnesota 55391 7/7/.7 ' r T Dear Jim: I am enclosing a copy of the preliminary plans of a proposed plat in Orono along with a copy of the section map which includes this property. Please review the proposal and irahe the neccssaiy investigation to prepare a soils map and report for this tract. Tlie City of Orono requires a complete^ review of soils conditions before considering new plats in areas to be serviced with on-site disposal systems. h’e in Orono are ever grateful for the assistance you have given us regarding this issue. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, Henry F. Ifiihich Zoning Administrator HHi: be Enclosure • ^M ■4 'em:- .-J r'.- A.. A 5 •' * 7. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: I reviewe I discove copy of t In checAi tJie dotted the time request t I’m sure attorney, rather th I liaven't I don't k should be might als h'e should property developed In checki by Orono Some of t required status of and such) Access to traffic p The rezon splits thi given str given str; future coi PLANNING i Sid Rebers Planning C( right of w< from devel( as per City 9-19-77). Tele phone 473-7357 ORONi Dla 55323•Municipal Offjcca ^ 4 nF I »‘ 1 . V 1 * ( I ■ . ^ w.. -t-i- -7 n Orono prepare a complete ► be serviced regarding ve me a call. '£ * i IKrrP '. » If •/ 'SY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission f| Coioicil Clo Hank MnJiich, Zoning Adjninistrator - Supplement to A1 Olson ’s Report September 30, 1977 Sidney Rebers - 2060 Kayzata Boulevard Subdivision (Preliminary) - Rezoning I reviewed the proix)sal and packet as previously prepared and distributed by Al. I discovered that a copy of tlie plat map section v;as missing. I'm enclosing a copy of the plat inap with this r.)emo as we do on all such proposals. In checking the plat mp, some interesting (luestions came to my attention. Note tiie dotted line indicated by the arrow on the copy of the plat map. I have not had the time to review exactly wiiat tiis dotted line might indicate, but we might request the applicant submit some lata to clarify the status of all t’nis property. I'm sure the status will be cleared when tlie title opinion is reviewed by our attorney, but it would probably be less expensive and less time consuming now rather than after preliminary approval. I haven’t heard anything from tlie State Highway D-enarti'icnt regarding this proposal. I don't know whetlier Al lias sent tlicm a copy to review'. Tlie State Highway FJept. should be consulted. Ihey iniglit be interested in additional right of way. \'e might also consider easements for service roads or other access alternatives. We should also obtain some direction from the City Engineer for drainage from the property so we have no future problems wiien the residenttally zoned area is developed. V>’e should provide for drainage casements at tliis time. In checking the plat map, I also remembered that utility services are not provided by Orono in this area. V'e should also require some clarification on this issue. Some of tJie properties in this area are serviced from Long Lake. Tlicse have all required the approval from tlie City of Long Lake. We must remember tlie current status of the Long Lake Sewer Plant (capacities, adequacy of sewer line sizes and such). Access to the projX'rties should also be addressed. We should resolve any possible traffic problems before making any determination on the proposal. The re zoning proposal appears favorable. 'Tlie B-1 zoned area currently described splits tlie Bill Wear property. It would seem to make more sense to follow a given straight line for zoning purjxises whenever it might be possible. If a given straight line is established today, I beliero we would eliminate any future controversies with other property owners in the imiTiediate B-1 district. PLANNING CaMISSION MEETING - October 3, 1977 Sid Rebers, his surveyor Ted Kemna, and Long Lake Councilman Barney Kogan were present. Planning Conuiission reviewed issues noted by Zoning Administrator. Status of State ri^t of way property to be reviewed by City Attorney with receipt of title opinion from developer. Sewer issue addressed. Drainage and utility easements to be provided as per City Engineer recommendations (copy of proposal has been sent to our engineer 9-19-77). ’ \\ 4c ir<f * *. If . Sidney Rcl>crs . Subdivision (I Page 2 The Zoning Ad subdivision p regarding the Mr. Kogan wa< was the rezor The Planning the legal dc: recorded unt The Planning receipt of r '\Y n's Report butcd by Al. nclosing a ntion. Note I bvive not had i\o miglit t’nis property. Oil bv our tuning now ; this proposal, ighway Dept, if way. V’e iTiatives. nage from tlie area is e not provided . this issue. ese have all t}ie current ine sizes e any |X)ssible ly described follow a e. If a te anv district. bgan were present, itatus of State title opinion its to be provided to our engineer % U i > Sidney R c Iwts - 2060 V.ayiata Boulevard Subdivision (Preliminary) - Rc-oning t— ...LL 'D 1 »a ^ur.c Page 2 // n : i„.y H o zoning A^is-tor subdivision Pr°P°"*b’i'"!bich abuns State Hiehway 12. regarding the proposal which anur _____ A. ^ was the ^coraaended approval of lUi -------A The PianniJigreceipt of reports from State i t ! j B'“ i <* f ftr- ! 4M : ^ TO: FROM: DA’FE: SUBJECT: This propo each excee land on Bi existing s County Par included i dock restr easements A public b PLANNING C John Gridl County Par the public The Planni discussed: 1. Flood a. b. d€ im de c. d. Li or Si ir 2.Soil I a. El b. c. 3( II oi Si ei 3.Hennq a. Si t< b. I » >n .1/ -A y 1 the mts n concern as exi^lained eceipt of not be 2Ct to TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission and Council A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator September 13, 1977 Durwell Vetter - Big Island Subdivision (Preliminary) This proposed subdivision involves the division of one parcel into each cxc^ding the minimum 2 acre, 200 foot width requirements for dry buildable livid on Big Island. All three parcels would retain water frontage, ^lere are no existing structures on the property. Tlie abutting land is ol^aled by the Hemepin Coi-Jity Park Reserve Board. The low or marshy lands along the shore are not included in the area calculations. Subdivision considerations should ^clude dock restrictions over the shoreland marshes including ojx^n space and o^nge easements over them and a park dedication fee. A public hearing has been scheduled for October 3, 1977, at 8:15 p.m. PLANNING CO^MISSION MI:HriNG - October 3, 1977 Tnlin Pridlev reorcsenting Mr. Vetter, was present. John Christian of the Hennepin County Par/Reserve and Dave Ifycr of the Metropolitan Park Commission also attended the public hearing. The Planning Commission rcvicKed tlie tliroc parcel subdivision. Following items wore discussed: 1.Flood plain designation a. determined at 932 elevation. , , . .. b. much of original tract consists of flood plain as a vast area is designated below this 932 elevation. , ,, 4. 4. 4.^ c. Limited area above 932 elevation would probably limit the tract to only two buildable sites. . d. Suggest new proposal noting total areas above 932 elevation of each individual parcel (87,120 sq. ft. required). 2. 3. Soil borings indicating high water table j „ a. Evidence of high water table would indicate difficulty in designing adequate septic systems in this area. , . -u. b. Inadequate septic system design could probably prolubit any building c. SuggS?developer submit septic plans for individual sites for City engineer review aJid report. Hennepin County Park Reserve's interest to acquire said property. a. Suggested parties meet to try to reach agreement before adding cost to revised proposal. . - , 1 b. If agreement cannot be reached, submit revised proposal. 'Durwell Vetter Subdivision (Pi Page 2 Planning Commis submit revised tlie Hennepin Cc Planning Commij report would hi STAFF - Octobei Letter to Henn< O O '\j hree lots, ry buildable Tliere are no the Hennepin arc not d include id floK-age 'Durweil Vetter - Big Island Subdivision CBrcliminaiy) Page 2 m ,-A.rtr PlanninE Comiiission tabled the issue for developer to negotiate with Park Resenre or subnat^revised proposal. Also directed Staff to request a soils map and report from the Hennepin CoSnty Soils Conservation District. ^ Planning &mmission and develoiier that any costs incurred by the City for such a report would have to be reimbursed by tlie developer. STAFF - October 6, 1977 Letter to Hennepin County Soil Conservation District requesting soils map and report. T I V ■ «! H V mi Mr. Jim At Hennepin ( 250 N. Cei V’ayzata, I Dear Jim: V’e’ve bcei unique, tiie propo low. 'Hie condition The City property. necessary If there collect t Copies of division give me s Sincerel) A K T / Henry F. Zoning At HFM: be ■ Enclosur Tk Reserve or d report from informed 'or such a \ip and report Tt'li'pHont 473-7357 m y'/- CUT Y of OEONO ,., Office Bex GG.Crystal B»y. Minnc,ol. 5M23-Munici,,«l Office On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 6, 1977 Mr. Jim Anderson 4.- ^ n^ct.-irtHennepin County Soil 5 V.-nter Consenation Dist.ict 250 N. Centi-al V’ayzata, Minnesota 55591 Dear Jim: Vi’e’ve been approached ^vith reservations on conditions here could si^port an adequate septic system. S:per'/y.°^"»pe ^oul^w^'^re'^eLt r“g!.tttn"g''to ^irisl?andt ^^ftL necessary site investigation. If there are any costs to the Cit,-. please let me know so can arrange to collect tliem frexn tJie develo^Dei. give me a call. Sincerely, /A. Henry F. Muiiich Zoning Administrator HFM: be ■ Enclosure % StfIH •H ! ? M•i f|!f5-- •ff nr '• lil i 3 !'•! ‘jini I'S \ f?rf ' I' 2 [ . \ llliJ Lli i I ®'S !! i! .01 mm ; i' c 'll I S3 :'i 0 ;i /T^ V i J ni! I i M|I i I = tl ^"i. I is! ij! F«: iFr s" 5*H 1 i'•ajii ^ I.- f l^i I • ;‘f •f| j 5'll! fq d vBIr Mfl •fi m fr? 0? 3 H m IWuVrMMra 1 I •'aFi rjli :ti j=i fj; if.Ir' 1 § ■•ifi I M§ wii* I ■ I r* I 01 'll t.-.: I•i", ill vsw m \u>^ •u!I'i /?: *u «•i li '■I/7 ii'i !l! f ‘Ii: 4I /? il i.-4- ■I" lit M w V-l•r. s'? f ‘ O!I' - /‘II « ^ 5/'i iy© i.5 01 «•#s I nr M!li ;.l■|i ^ H;i-4 f? /?• il! sf f’ ^ilill i =!■'/ @ I:: j m «iTT<iro«fi3niMf« Mi •«%. Min ^:vT.d:Lucia* Strait IIM la* St. Uayrata* Ml SStSluCITY oriimwo __ f llchaH fcavatif }*«0 Carolina *«•. Uayaat* M ISMl 1 I in oriA<it\ntmi\j »ts < J Clf Y IW I OTTuroMHni lift «iroRum» • «M«A ft«|. mnnaapoll*. Ml jjay ** I irriMoiiiivo roaka Uaat P—t--------- »M4raM* Saeal.l.,, « ■V V Virginia Str«M lltO Foa «t.Uayaata, Ml SSMt C->*aca I at a mat I anal lac. atini «a)atl abukhagra 1’*1 Foa ft. «*F*ata. Ml Jtiai eiB*y« St. Jah* !«» Faa St. Uayaaia, Ml SSMl .11^Jktf*cta4 -MW« SubdivUitMltk>m IH I LoAf l^km, m»o« IM • Ukftf t«k«« W SM%%Stfmtm %U9i #a23«. Mm«1m J. D«yM t. MolafcM Laka Cs. tIT K 10th StrwK « 10401 «. hath a. larrlMia 1101 Ct* *4. C lAiif M*. m HIM ■ 114 f»»l at that l*art ol »• 1/4 o( •» 1/4 lyil>4 f of N 410 1/14 f«»t thaiaol. ra. *»a4mo - Tilt - »11 4.41 acta*41114 - 4114■ 114 taat ol » 111 f*o« at that ®l«■ 1/4 ol M 1/4 lyln* » ol " 410 1/10 laot th#E4*of •tn. Ko*4M« • TMI ' Nt»4.il4ii2t - 4^41CON •* KN ror!v*r of Ml 1/4 or iNf 1/4 TB B t# LK>lnt ?ll f«»«i B cornof thoroof T«t 41 foot TB B 101 f-ot iM MILf to Ng cornaa ol U 1/4 ol S» 1/4 T« * 410 1/10 laat f« 4 parallal alth ■ Una Ihatasl ta M Una thataaf Th ■ ta ba^lnnin* fa. aaa4. kit - »110 - all 11.44 acraa 41110 - 0114■aa. 41 «o4a I el ■« cornaf ol M4 1/4 at ra 1/4 TM M 40 hoda T» f to CT« ol Matattaah aoa4 TO «L1 aloof aaaa to the I Una of m 1/4 ol SM 1/4 T« ■ to aofinntnf fa. hoad. al( - TUi - all 10.00 aoiae 41114 - IMO That part ol the 41 1/4 lyinf « ol ^ and tha B 7TJ fc#t th*»r40€»f Is. Mt»4*g■ Qf t • gM, «t th« of B 1*M# of 11.SUBsr.ri: :2S*;i:i;\ir.Miror.:?i c-: MB. to tho Intorooo oltB • lino p«iollol with an4 J»» f»«t « I Uoo of B l/J“ * aluivf »at4 I.ak«t Tg »m.f at ra 1/4 ol 4«a 14l to t aluM aald parallel Una to the ahota of Lonf l.atai TO »««.» ■Lt and IWLt ali.nf raid ahora Una ta aarat SLt "-^napol aaoT I.and 4ata»» »o. lUOl TO 0 to anfla pt. la aalO Land itiiToTt ™ * . 11%.11 faati TO 0 to at tn.inac ol aald l-and lurvayi TO O to 00 -otnnt tharmll 10 0 to no corner ol a.f. Land lutaey »o. »14i TO O alonf O Una theiaal to the Intataee. with a Una parallel eilh and /•% feet 0 ol O line of lea lit TO 0 alona aald parallal lino to the S Una ol lart 1 »od. Sobd. «o. Itll TO O alone eald 4 Una and Ita eataneloa to the 0 line ot J«,hnato«e* 4,t. at HL4S40 Lon* lake kddni TO O to ta« (• l/»l IH - Tilt - 111 41410 - Mia 1. Albert 4. OMtawa 4 Nila l%44 - 4th A»a. 0. L'Hif taka, 00 %klM0. hlbatt 4. Mhlioea 4 Oilal%44 • 4th Are. a ton« Lake, 00 %%I141, Jaae* 1. taeianoa 4 Ml'al%M - 4th Aea. 0. tnno Lake. MO %>IM it iq>> w-rw — ► - ■