Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-01-1977 Planning Packet
Mmmmmim •<«-.. >v% r, jv - , V -'• , \ t \ > T‘^ • 'V m ' *<•' ■ -• I > s I-4' . ^ V'" ^ ► ■. ./ '*• ^ ■. ‘iH. V ‘i '^ri * ^<■ ■’■:'f. M: 5' >i •■" »->rV . ' ' ' ' ■ ■' ■ ^ * -, ■? * •*. " TV ?'■ --W. <•>■■••. i'.’Tfe^f^;-'.' L, T ... *% - . / » .!>■ .. 'v V'-ii'•' ' > ''I -'ift V' .V- 'p'fti •*‘ ■•«•• “ t ^vj ‘ i • ' , ■* * . ' ■**• ^ w. 4», - ' r..f ■ P r "t-'’' *^y ■ . ^ ■ :. V’f• ‘ fair wfc..' - Vll:?|v- .■;»g:MaBr‘~ A G E N D A PIANNING CCWIISSION meeting of AU^^ 1. 1977 aXJNClL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. « I, CURRENT ITEMS A. Action Items 1. 2. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Subdivision (Preliminary) ■ 2^ Poii^t Road Subdivision (Preliminary) #289 - Public Hearing - 8-00 P*’’"* ^ ._^. n^-dHamilton Moran - 2965 Casco Point Road Street Vacation , ,.,w i# 1977 Minutes of ’'^Sulaj^^l^’^tng o #275 - Robert F. White setback - Reconsider Variance - Rear i^Vstra) - 3080 North Shore Drive# 73 - Lawrence Reardon (Wiillip Dykstraj Subdivision (Final) ■ ^ifiaSf- C»|tionaI Use Permit #286 - Metz - «7«7 miiam Martin - 2380 Watertown Road ■ todiUcml use Peimit - Horse ®d Bam #291 - William Wear - 2120 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Permit B. Work Session Items '• • Suirfpmi Hearing Scheduled for August 15, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. r \\% t / i % T ! Agenda -■ Augus Page 2 C. Incon 1. « 2. i 3. I 4. I 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. II. COMPLETI A. Com] 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Agenda - August 1, 1977 Page 2 C. Incomplete Iterns 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. #188 #202 #209 #217 #242 #248 #261 8. #266 - 9. #281 - Steve Wallack (T.M.G. Corporation) - 4100 Sixth Avenue N. Subdivision (Preliminary) Richard Ledstrom - 3465 Sixth Avenue Norp « j Wetlands Variance - Conditional Use Permit - Duck Pond North Star Marina - 3324 North Shore Drive Conditional Use Permit 5 Riprap Gayle’s Marina - 3366 North Shore Drive Building Plan Approval - 1977 License - No New Site Plan 315 East Grai'T Corporation - 1200 Old Crystal Bay Road Sheldon Jrcplis - 2640 North Shore Drive (Subdivision) t Crosstown Properties, Inc. - 3201 Navarre Lane Subdivision - PRD William Stewart - 140 Leaf Street Variance ■ Lot Area 5 Width II. COMPLETED ITBIS FOR COJNCIL A. Completed Items 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. #200 #275 #278 #282 #255 #269 7. #288 - WutlS'K^fe/- 25r“iConley Brooks - 1125 Spring Hill Road - Subdivision (Preliminary) John^Burger - 3700 Bayside Road - Subdivision (Final) - Concurred Home Federal Savings § lx)an Association - 493 Park Lane Variance - Lot Area 5 Width - Tabled ^ r. • •Noiman Kuglin - 2314 Shady^vood Road - Variance Revision - Concurred Plan oad Lution - Tabled ir Yard Setback request Liminary) - Concurred (Preliminary) lal) - Concurred c Lane /ision - Concurred The Orono PlannL the following mei ^tembers Guthrie, Also present: A Chairwoman McDon place for a publ Kelley for a sub. Watertov-n Road, the Notice of Pul Publication. Mr. Olson stated division of his would exceed the requirements. M there are no wet the southeast co on our wetlands : Bruce Kelley was there are no wet they are proposi; access altemati directly from Wa was not shown be house operations After all the pu closed at 7:40 p After a brief di to recommend app a park dedicatio: Chairvs'oman McDon and place for a Moran for a subd Point Road. The Notice of Public Mr. ^foran was pr property on Case contained two se enable each dwel lot Avould slight based on the str this application for lot width at Lot B exceeds th 20 ft. at the sh on each side, th -A-, 7 ,.7v'' / i-; '■'.^. * 4i i % ’■'V % 7^- n it* ? 1 . -?* ;i VI ^ % f < V E’ % CITY OF ORDNO, MINNESOTA REGUIAR PLANNING CCMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairwoman McDonald, Menbers Guthrie, Dunlap, Hurr, Hosfield, Hassel and Hannah. Also present: Asst. Zoning Administrator A1 Olson. Chairwoman McDonald announced that this was the time and place for a public hearing on the petition of Kelley and Kelley for a subdivision of pr^erty located at 2325 Watertown Road. The Asst. Zoning Administrator presented the Notice of Public Hearing and the Affidavit of Publication. Mr. Olson stated that the applicant is requesting a division of his property into tliree parcels. Each lot would exceed the minimum 2 acre, 200 ft. lot width requirements. Mr. Olson also pointed out that although there are no wetlands on Lot 1 and Lot 2, a portion of the southeast comer of Lot 3 is designated as marshland on our wetlands map. Bruce Kelley was present. Mr. Kelley contended that there are no wetlands on this property. He advised that they are proposing to sell the large parcel. Discussed access alternatives and the desireability of one access directly from Watertown Road. Applicant says that this was not shown because it would interfere with the green house operations and septic system installation. After all the public were heard, the piblic hearing was closed at 7:40 p.m. After a brief discussion, Guthrie moved, Hannah seconded, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to a park dedication fee. Ifotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Chairwoman McDonald announced that this was the time and place for a public hearing on the petition of Hamilton Moran for a subdivision of property located at 2965 Casco Point Road. The Asst. Zoning Administrator presented tlie Notice of Public Hearing and the Affidavit of Publication. Mr. Ntoran was present. Subdivision is based on existing property on Casco Point Road which for many years has contained two separate homes. This subdivision would enable each dwelling to have its o\%ti property. Each lot would slightly exceed the 1/2 acre area requirement based on the street vacation request which is part of this application. Lot A meets the SO5 requirement for lot width at tlie shore but narroivs at the street. Lot B exceeds the minimum at the street but narrows to 20 it. at the shore. Due to the required 10 ft. setback on each side, the mirimum dock setback would not be met. ATTEND\NCE - 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HE\RING - 7:30 P.M. KELLEY § KELLEY 2325 WATERTOls'N ROAD SUBDIVISION (PRELIMIM\RY) (#285) '1^ 's r i| PUBLIC HEARING - 7:45 P.M. HA^^ILTON MORAN 2965 CASCO POINT ROAD SUBDIVISION (PRELIMINARY) STREET VACATION (#289) S ‘ t' MINUTES OF A PLANNH There were no commei closed the public h< and opened the publ] The Asst. Zoning Adr street vacation wou] and Mr. ^foran. The location on Casco P( actual location of 1 shown on the map is exists today and do€ way or future utilit Point Road where the the traveled road is property. This proposal as sut property lines to re line of the existing a 20 ft. roadway. C right of way for pri for public roads. C the city engineer re After all the commen closed at 8:18 p.m. The Commission conti and street vacation, ing the platting pr sufficient right of Commission felt that centerline was inade for public roads sho Commission noted tha are based on a 10 ft their concern about 60 ft. road width be available to them at After a lengthy disc the subdivision and staff to come back w ever assumptions are situation such as th Council as to the ov other affected prope Hosfield moved, Hass Planning Commission ; Motion - Ayes (7), N f:.- L^NCE - 7:30 P.M. : HE\RING - 7:30 P.M. 5 KELLEY ATERTas-N ROAD ISION (PRELIMIMARY) : HEARING - 7:45 P.M. rON MORAN ZASCD POINT ROAD IHSIQN (PRELIMINARY) r VACATION ) ■ ■ / 1J fei^’ M. 4 ? V MINUTES OF A PLANNING C^‘^^SSIa^ MEETING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 - PAGE 2 f ! There were no comments from the public. Chairwoman 'IcDonald closed the public hearing for the subdivision at 7:55 p.m. and opened the public hearing concerning the street vacation. HAMILTON M)RAN (cont inued) (#289) The Asst. Zoning Administrator stated that the proposed street vacation would involve a trade off between the City and Mr. Moran. The existing situation is that the platted location on Casco Point Road varies considerably from the actual location of the traveled road. The \^cation as shown on the map is the actual width of the pavement as it exists today and does not include any additional right of way or future utilities. There are locations on Casco Point Road where the platted road actually disappears and the traveled road is running entirely through platted property. This proposal as submitted is for a rearrangement of the property lines to reflect a 10 ft. offset frcwn the center line of the existing paved right of \<ay making a total of a 20 ft. roadway. City standards require at least a 50 ft. right of way for private roads and a 60 ft. right of way for public roads. Commission noted the recommendation of the city engineer requiring at least a 50 ft. width. After all the comments were heard, the piiblic hearing was closed at 8:18 p.m. The Commission continued discussing the proposed subdivision and street vacation. Commission recognized need for correct ing the platting problems and the necessity for having sufficient right of way width to be permanently adequate. Commission felt that the proposed 10 ft. offset from the existing centerline was inadequate and that the 60 ft. requirement for public roads should be considered. Commission noted that the size of the lots in this subdivision are based on a 10 ft. offset from the centerline. Expressed their concern about the area of each lot should a 50 ft. or 60 ft. road width be required. This information was not available to them at this time. After a lengthy discussion, Hannah moved, Hassel seconded, to table the subdivision and street vacation applications and request staff to come back with the respective lot areas using what ever assumptions are appropriate for us in a public road situation such as this. Also requested some direction from Ccuncil as to the overall problem on Casco Point Road and other affected properties, ^fotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Hosfield moved, Hassel seconded, that t)ie minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 18, 1977, be approved. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES MF.ETING JULY 18, 1977 MINUTES OF A PLA! Mr. Olson advise back to the Comm applicant was ad City office that not be able to a Hassel moved, Du until the next it The Asst. Zoning and final subdi\ imately one yeai park dedication was subject to i no lake access c Mr. Reardon was proposal with aj applicant that : easements for L< have no ripariai Hassel moved, Gi subdivision app easements being no riparian aco fee of $2,000. The Asst. Zonin has submitted a the house so th line with the B proposal has be location. Jack Rhode, his Jerry Guetzkow he was withdraw structure as a use this buildi graphy of the 1 aixi felt that n merit of comprc Mr. Peterson ac involved with 1 farther back yc take. There w< Qiairman McDon again this pro property becau. by the proposa appears to be i ^ M3RAN led) OF MINUTES JULY 18, 1977 minutes of a planning CaWlSSlON MEETING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 - PAGE 3 •it.. 1 Mr. Olson advised that Council had referred this item back to the Commission for reccjnsideration. IVhen applicant was advised of this action, he informed the City office that because of prior commitments he would not be able to attend this meeting. Hassel moved, Dunlap seconded, to table^is application until the next meeting. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). The Asst. Zoning Administrator advised that preliminary and final subdivision approval had been granted approx imately one year ago to this property. . However, the park dedication fee was never paid. was subject to a park dedication fee of $2,000 and no lake access easement be given for Lot B. Mr. Reardon was present. Conmission reyievved final proposal with applicant. Planning Commission advised applicant tliat it would be necessary to record access ea^ments for Lot A through Lot B and that Lot B would have no riparian rights. Hassel moved, Guthrie seconded, to recommend final subdivision approval as submitted subject to access easements being recorded for Lot A through Lot B, no riparian access for Lot B and a park dedication fee of $2,000. hfotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). The Asst. Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Rhode has submitted a new set of plans. He has rel(^ated the house so that the lake edge of the house is in line with the Becker house next door. The current proposal has been moved back 35 ft. from the original location. Jack Rhode, his architect Bob Peterson, and builder Jerry Guetzkow were present. Mr. Rliode explained that he was withdrawing his TC<‘{uest to use the existing structure as a guest house. He is now proposing to use this building for storage. In temns of the topo graphy of the land, he preferred the original proposal and felt that moving the house farther back was a merit of compromise. Mr. Peterson advised that there would be more costs involved with the current proposal because the farther back you go on the lot tlie more fill itwill take. Tliere would also be a problem with the grade. Chairman McDonald felt that after visiting the site again this proposal had less of an impact to tlic Becker property because the side of Mr. Becker’s home affected by the proposal has no windoi^/s, 'This proposal also appears to be more in line with the Becker home. ROBERT F. IVHITE 320 hOODHILL ROAD VARIANCE - REAR YARD SETBACK (#275) LAURF31CE REARDCN (PHILLIP DYKSTRA) 3080 NORTH SHORE DRIVE SUBDIVISION (FINAL) (#73) JACK RHODE 1410 BOHNS roiNT ROAD VARIANCE - LOT AREA 5 WIDTH CONDITIONAL USE PERNHT (#210) i Vi * t ^ ■' 4 minutes OF A PLA] Mr. 5 Mrs. Becke concerns and obj these were: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) When Avas th understand! before the grant varia Did prior c Lot in ques 140 ft. wic His nearest he purchase that the Ic opposed to Becker’s pi (7) (8) level would A variance this propel granted anc Becker fell It is his i 10 ft. fror proposed di close to tJ No more the lot. He requested thj items into accoi After all the c< parties involve* proposal before In addressing t Planning Cannis was a substanda The variance gr forth at that t conditions coul Due to the fact request to use there would be Conceming the Orono code does Commission alsc average setback adjacent and ne they felt that resolve this ma iiHi F. ^VHITE imiLL ROAD E - REAR YARD SETBACK :e REARDCN [P DYKSTRA) 3RTH SIDRE DRIVE I SI ON (FINAL) iODE ^INS roiNT ROAD :E - LOT AREA § WIDTH lONAL USE PERNDT ‘•a \\ % ! »ts mMINUTES OF A PLANNING Ca^ASSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 - PAGE 4 Mr. § Mrs. Becker were also present. They expressed their concerns and objections regarding the proposal. Some of these were: IVhen was the land legally platted? It was their understanding that if the land was legally platted before the 1965 zoning, Orono policy would tend to grant variances. „ Did prior owner own the lot as an adjacent property. Lot in question was less than the 1 acre a^e^i and 140 ft. width requirements. His nearest neighbor is presently 140 ft. away, hhen he purchased his house he was advised by his attorney that the lot in question was unbuildable. He is opposed to the 26 ft. setback on Mr. Rhode's house. Becker's prefer the quiet and felt that the noise level would be increased. . A variance had been granted in October of 1974 to this property subject to no other variances being granted and the carriage house being razed. Mr. Becker felt this should be enforced. It is his understanding that a driveway should be 10 ft. from a lot line. Mr. Becker felt that the proposed driveway for the Rhode property was too close to the lot line. No more than 1 principal building located on tlie lot. He requested that the Planning Conmission should take these items into account when making their decision. After all the comments were heard frcm the concerned parties involved, the Planning Commission discussed the proposal before them. In addressing the points brought up by Mr. Becker, the Planning Conmission advised that the lot in question was a substandard lot rather than an unbuUdable lot. The variance granted in 1974 and the conditions set forth at that time were nov^r void. However, the sanie conditions could again be applied to this application. Due to the fact that Mr. Rhode has witlidrawn his request to use the existing structure as a guest house, there would be only one principal biiilding on this lot. Concerning the driveway being too close to the lot line, Orono code does iioL specify ajiy setback requiiemeiit. Commission also discussed the 75 foot lakeshore and average setback in relation to this property and the adjacent and nearby properties. Given all the facts, they felt that Mr. Rhode was cooperative in trying to resolve this matter. JACK R}«DE (continued) (#210) minutes of a plann: Conmission also de‘ v/ere to be gravel, 25% hardcover requ; There were some ne; regard to the carr felt that there wa of the lot and the removed. Guthrie moved, Hos of the application in recognition of house and existing hfotion:4 ayes 0^ 2 nays (D 1 Abstain Asst. Zeming Admin is for filling and This area had been in over the years, to refill area so and level off to ir recommended that t front prior to any Mr. Metz was prese to use sand or are Commission express in the lakeshore £ of a natural situj new. After some disci: recommend approv be riprapped pri fill be approved Nays (0), Abstai Planning Commissh advising that the^ Their request is of a horse. Appl: and Willow and ha: which is 2.68 acn across Willow Dri” Adjoining propert; no objection to t Hannah moved, Hos until the next me to indicate where length of the pre ^K)DE Lnued) ? ■■ i V • MINirrES OF A PLANNING CaWlSSION MELTING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 - PAGE 5 Conmission also detennined that if the proposed driveway v/ere to be gravel, current proposal would be under the 25% hardcover requirement. There were some negative feelings on the Commission with regard to the carriage house. Members Dunlap and Hunr felt that there was too much building bulk for the size of the lot and therefore the carriage house should be removed. Guthrie moved, Hosfield seconded, to recommend approval of the application subject to having a gravel driveway in recognition of the total hardcover on the planned house and existing building. Motion: 4 ayes O^assel, McDonald, Hosfield, Guthrie) 2 nays (Dunlap, Hurr) 1 Abstain (Hannah) Asst. Zoning Administrator explained that this application is for filling and grading within the lakeshore area. This area had been dredged one time before and h^ filled in over the years. Applicant is requesting permission to refill area so as to be level of adjacent properties and level off to make lawn area. Letter from engineer recommended that the area should be riprapped across the front prior to any filling. Mr. lietz was present. He stated that he was proposing to use sand or area like fill for the project. Planning Ccjmmission expressed concern about authorizing any filling xn the lakeshore area, but felt this would be the restoring of a natural situation rather than creation of an>Thing new. After some discussion, Hurr moved, Hassel seconded, to reccHTimend approval contigent on the fact that the shoreline be riprapped prior to any filling and that the type of fill be approved by the city engineer. Motion - Ayes (6), Nays (0), Abstain (1) ^fcDonald. Planning Commission ^^^as informed that applicant had called advising that they would be unable to attend this meeting. Their request is for a conditional use permit for the keeping of a horse. Applicant owns 1.13 acres at comer of Watertown and Willow and has leased the adjoining property to the north which is 2.68 acres. Mr. 5 Mrs. Gonsolus, property owners across Willow Drive, were present and had some objections. Adjoining property asner Rusciano has submitted a letter of no objection to the inaintaining of a bam on this property. Hannah moved, Hosfield seconded, to table this application until the next meeting to allow the Martin's to be present to indicate where the bam is located on this lot and the length of the present lease. Ifotion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). JACK RHODE (continued) (#210) j THEODORE METZ 4300 NORTH SHORE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (#286) WILLIAM MARTIN 2380 I^ATERTOIVN RQ‘\D CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HORSE AND BARN (#287) MINUTES OF A PLA Mr. Wear was pre use permit to us service. Discus use but a condit would be consist' Mr. Wear advised the property and to the rear of tl After some discu! approval of the < that the activity structure. Appl; Motion - Ayes {7] A public hearing at 7:30 p.m. After a brief dis between Council a Hi*'field seconded nv.etings be chang evenings. Motion Menfcer Dunlap no increase in her ; the Commission, and suggested th; for six months ai Member Dunlap ag: Hannah moved, Mcl> absence until Jam that time. If Mei to resign, the mai Motion - Ayes (7), Guthrie moved, Ha* adjourned at 10:2! RHODE :inued) 0 . M DORE METZ NORFH SHORE DRIVE mom USE PERMIT 6) LIAM M^R^IN 0 K\TERTOW’N RQ^D DITIOm USE PER.MIT 5E AND R\RN 87) Hi ■' 1 i; 4£ % V-. i L 4 IS f ■» mm MINUTES OF A PLANNING 00^^1ISS10N MEETING HELD AUGUST 1, 1977 - PAGE 6 Mr. Wear was present. He is requesting approval of a conditional use pemit to use existing structure for retail tire and auto service. Discussed this proposed use as an allowed industrial use but a conditional B-1 use. Planning Commission felt proposal would be consistent with the area. Mr. Wear advised that this is intended to be a temporary use of the property and that his leasee will not have use of the land to the rear of the building. After some discussion, Hassel moved, Ilurr seconded, to reconmend approval of ^e conditional use permit with the understanding that the activity be conducted within the confines of the structure. Application to come up for review in one year. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). A public hearing was scheduled for Monday, August 15, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. After a brief discussion concerning the joint meetings between Council and Planning Commission, ^^cDonald moved, Hr ;field seconded, to recommend that these proposed nn.r:tings be changed from Tliursday evenings to TTiesday evenings. Motion > Ayes (7), Nays (0). ^fe^i)er Dunlap notified the Commission that due to an increase in her activities she would have to resign frcwii the Commission. Coimission was very concerned about this and suggested that Menber Dunlap take a leave of absence for six months and review her situation at that time. ^fember Dunlap agreed. Hannah moved, McDonald seconded, to accept a leave of absence until January 1978, and review situation at that t^. If ^fember Dunlap still felt she would need to resign, the matter would be considered at that time. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Guthrie moved, Hassel seconded, that the meeting be adjourned at 10:25 p.m. ‘7^ "r WILLIAM WTAR 2120 WAYZATA BOUI^ARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (#291) LUCIAN STRONG I860 FOX STREET SUBDIVISION (PRELIMINARY) (#290) JOINT MEETINGS PLANNING CaMISSION § COUNCI I ADJ0UR\"^D2sT - 10:25 P.M. mam / AGENDA PLANNING C(M!ISSICN MEETING OF AUGUST 1, 1977 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. I. CURRENT ITEMS A. Action Items 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Call to Order #285 - Public Hearing - 7:30 p.m. Kelley ^ Kelley - 2325 Watertown Road Subdivision (Preliminary) #289 - Public Hearing - 7:45 p.m. Hamilton Moran - 2965 Casco Point Road Subdivision (Preliminary) #289 - Public Hearing - 8:00 p.m. Hamilton Moran - 2965 Casco Point Road Street Vacation Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 18, 1977 6.#275 4:7.# 73 8.#210 •JS'V 9.#286 10.#287 11.#291 Variance - Rear Yard Setback - Reconsider Lawrence Reardon (Phillip Dykstra) - 3080 Subdivision (Final) Jack Rhode - 1410 Bohns Point Road Variance - Lot Area § Width - Conditional Use Permit Theodore Metz - 4300 North Siore Drive Conditional Use Permit - Filling William Martin - 2380 Watertown Road Conditional Use Permit - Horse and Bam William Wear - 2120 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Peimit B. Work Session Items 1. #290 - Lucian Strong - 1860 Fox Street Subdivision (Preliminary) - Public Hearing Scheduled for August 15, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. I ^ Agenda Page 2 - Auj C.Inc 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. II. COMPLET A. Ccm 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. > *r ■ »hore Drive ■mit lied for -■ - ■. V v>?:: ^ ! f';-v ;:4;] X Agenda - August 1, 1977 Page 2 C. Incomplete Iterns 1.#188 2.#202 3.#209 4.#217 5.#242 6.#248 7.#261 8.#266 9.#281 Steve Wallack (T.M.G. Corporation) - 4100 Sixth Avenue N, Subdivision (Preliminary) Harrison Johnston - 925 Willow Drive Conditional Use Permit 5 Variance - Tabled - Moratorium Richard Ledstrom - 3465 Sixth Avenue North Wetlands Variance - Conditional Use Permit - Duck Pond Robert Birkeland - 1298 Wildhurst Trail Wetlands Variance - Dredging Permit - Deferred - Ntoratorium North Star Marina - 3324 North Shore Drive Conditional Use Permit Riprap Gayle's Marina - 3366 North Shore Drive Building Plan Approval - 1977 License - No New Site Plan 315 East Grant Corporation - 1200 Old Crystal Bay Road Sheldon Jacobs - 2640 North Shore Drive (Subdivision) Crosstown Properties, Inc. - 3201 Navarre Lane Subdivision - PRD William Stewart - 140 Leaf Street Variance - Lot Area 5 Width II. COMPLETED ITB1S FOR COUNCIL A. Completed Items 1. 2. #200 #275 3. 4. #278 #282 Victoria Grain Company - 500 North Arm Drive - Resolution - Tabled Robert F. White - 320 Woodhill Road - Variance - Rear Yard Setback Referred back to Planning Commission at applicant's request William Kelley - 2340 Fox Street - Subdivision (Preliminary) - Cbncurred Conley Brooks - 1125 Spring Hill Road - Subdivision (Preliminary) Concurred John Burger - 3700 Bayside Road - Subdivision (Final) - Concurred Home Federal .Savings 5 Loan Association - 493 Park Lane Variance - Lot rea 5 Width - Tabled 7. #288 - Norman Kuglin - 2314 Shadywood Road * Variance Revision - Concurred 5. 6. #255 #269 ••• .s''.' ,\ ' \ \ - sz:i fe aagf.- nue N. rium ond ratorium Plan load (lution - Tabled jar Yard Setback ; request jliminary) - Concurred i (Preliminary) il) - Concurred Lane sion - Concurred !■ ' K ■ \\ ' \ \ VELLMSEOFOEONO POP s.ao : Q- V SCALC tJOOO Ipoo 4pOO 5.000 william r MILLS VIWL***' i ■ )■ >v. t f I V Barbara City of P. O. Bo^ Crystal Sut Dear Bar I h tion, in dum to t Through dredged to silta GF:sc 128( SOI . ■■ m >Vi^V mm 1^' fF ^ r ^ V McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS ■ SITE PLANNERS #2 July 29, 1977 AUG 1 1977 ^ Barbara Ewald City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota VIULAGB Oa QBOU^ Subject: Therdore Metz - 4300 North Shore Drive Conditional Use Permit - Filling Dear Barbara: I have reviewed the subject conditional use permit applica tion, including a site visit. I concur with A1 Olson's memoran dum to the Planning Commission and Council, dated July 13, 1977. Through properly filling, sodding, and riprapping, the existing dredged mooring could be up graded with minimal impact relative to siltation. Very truly yours, McC MBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. g frank, P.E. GF: sc 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 65441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET. HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 879-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION. MARSHALL. MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532 5820 printed on recycled paper if .-’tm r Barbara Ew City of Or P.O. Box 6 Crystal Ba Subje Dear Barba As re division a the actual of the exi with vacat with the p we recomme maintenanc GF: sc 12805 4 2 SOUTP Qi DB applica- I memoran- 13, 1977. existing ; relative JS, INC. >12) 559-3700 9^029 }7) 532 5820 McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS ■ SITE PLANNERS July 29, 1977 Barbara Ewald City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Subject: Hamilton Moran - 2965 Casco Point Road Subdivison (Preliminary) and Street Vacation Dear Barbara: As requested, we have reviewed the subject preliminary sub- (jiyision application which includes a street vacation. Since^ the actual existing roadway is not located within the boundaries of the existing platted right-of-way, we cannot see any problems with vacating the old right-of-way. However, in conjunction with the proposed right-of-way that Mr. Moran intends to dedicate, we recommend that a 50 foot right-of-way be obtained to facilitate maintenance and future construction. Very truly yours. McCDMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Greg F^nk, P.E. GF:sc ■ • ' ^'^-n?7rr tj > ’i' f. :^7? '—^I I V,' ' '.QT -------'-I 12806 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET. HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE 1612) 879-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE 1507) 532-5820 nrintori nn rinner Barbarj City o: P.O. B< Crystal Dear Bi A; have r« Based • commeni GF:sc T*,': ' 39 sub- ce iaries •blems m sdicate, militate [NC. inn — ' / 'JjI ' # 7 ••w * I j^.l J e-3700 ■5820 Wm:~n 0 if1 pm »ts a, j;i:KI -.. **.5?!> *•■'■n ■>>:liiW McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS ■ SITE PLANNERS #2 July 29, 1977 Barbara Ewald City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Subject: Kelley and Kelley - 2325 Watertown Road Subdivision (Preliminary) Dear Barbara: As you requested in your July 18, 1977 correspondence, I have reviewed the subject preliminary subdivision application. Based on the information submitted and a site visit, i re commend approval of the application. Very Ifruly yours. MCC0MBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Grdfg Fr/nk, P.E. GF: sc falEIBll'Jij'V: AUG 1 W" uiLtiLGa oa Ci %» 12806 OLSON MEMOBIAL HIOHWAV. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA ’ ^ELEJ-HO^ 22 NORTH MAIN STREET. HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 65350 TELEPHONE 16121 879,M» SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL. MINNESOTA 66258 TELEPHONE <607 5 '7 i ii i r PLAIv'iaKG COMHI CITY OF ORONO P. .0. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, M Gentlemen: VJith respect i of July 5. 19: City to Moran property, Mr. factors conce: the liayor, ant "public interi to each of th( division prop< each of the t: Following; are 1. The appli( Commission, eu application f< County Registe requested, as an accurate si to be vacated, take action tc existing since considerable e should have be 2 # At the sa provide a sep the property and the other the Morans in extra survey i status. We w penalty for d> and feel that a line betweei taxes all the 3. Having subm tc the requests fees other than ^T e shall appreci as prompt action cc: ir. Henry ^phi 3)ning minis NC. nee, I cation. re- S, INC. rjii \ I 05 »12( 559-3700 '9-8029 07) 5J2-5820 285 b mi I: r ^ H. HAMILTON MORAN 2965 CASCO POIOT ROAD V/AYZATA, MIl^N. 55391 (T\.# /■w' S\ •* \ PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF OROKO P. JO. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MINN. 55323 Diane Dunlop John Guthrie Richard Hassel George Hosfield Jo Ellen Hurd Gloria McDonald Gentlemen: With respect to potential fees over and above those already paid on our application of July 5, 1977, covering vacating of land by Moran to the City of Orono and by the City ^ Moran, Perry, and Hartzell; and covering proposed division of the Moran pro^rty, Mr. M^ich ^s been so good as to suggest that if we bring the special M ^ concerni^ this application to the attention of the Planning Commission, Attorney might be able to advise that to eich Grai^father" clauses made it correct to waive separate fees to each of the ownep on the "Vacate” action, and the so-called "Park Fee" on the each of\hr+T^o®^ at the request of the City, to create a separate taxable lot for each of the tuo residences existing on the Moran property for 60-70 years. Following are the factors: Commi^sion^^an^^+K^ ^^^^®sponse to urging by the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Council at meetings in connection with the (granted) Mo^n CoSty^RegLter of^ds inaccuracies of the Plat at the Lnnepin revested as thfr?+fh T manifest by the Moran survey; and applicants were an accurate ^^he owner^ expense, to be vacated with legal description of the actual road and the properties takfa^Sn to joining in this so the CUy couW ^StiM ®°”®®^^*>’e City and County Records to ooni-orm Kith location and usagesine© the rocid. W3.s nut m ci“Po» ^ ^ ^ considerable exnense of +iTno =r.^ + ^ been done per application, at sho-ad have been done by the town^hiror°coStrtec^i^°193l!°"®*^^'^ meetings, the Horans were urged to divide the Moran uronertv to Ko4r?;^c: *r° ha^e^xSted on and the'othL rented “iLfaSif tl;e”^a^e°?^ °f- “'^®'’ “ the Horans in this connection were that 0/^^*^^! • °°®*® mentioned to status. We were not Lde aware iS*anrtiSe^®the^^^ continuing the prese.nt "Grandfather" penalty for doing what the h.a ^ the_ possibility of a $2130 "lark Fee" and feil that it^would be enti^elv u^n° ’ application was submitted, a line between 2 residencerJSf L”"SLLd“herrfo^^^ taxes all the ti„e - while the Ci?^ orth^’^^o^Ty fo^ rrSd^^-^tc"?^^ lo t!!t''r~uesS“f1ht Ci?v“we f ^ otherwise complied at owners* expense .s,»' T.r it as ^mpt^^^i^^as ^0™ oro^°ap^U^ation!’“''*’ ®f^®®®* cc: ir. Henry Miihich 2pning ministrator u ^ r I > TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: 1 Applicant ij the one witi house to ha^ due to the « 200 ft. in V Because of t variance (fi the Woodhil] A septic sys his review, and should i A public hea PLANNING OG^ Planning Con subdivision. Planning Con existing dri Recoimended access, to p to a park de On the varia course prope Variance tid)! COUNCIL MEET] ^jproved pre] egress easemc problems in t Council was i acted on vari for Planning PLANNING COM^ Setback varia Preliminary p! } ** \O) Jo Ellen Hurd Gloria McDonald il ild 5ur application :ono and by the 3f the Moran the si>ecial Commission, id vise that separate fees c Fee'* on the Lxable lot for reairs. itor, the Planning [granted) Moran at the Hennepin applicants were rners* expense, id the ijroperties > the City could >cation and usage *r application, at : which it appears ", 'life (Toperty to ve existed on in by owners ts mentioned to e rather considerable present "Grandfather" 2033 "I^k Pee" ation was submitted, r simply djrawing d been paying full r the road, etc. owners* expense Facto, to assess 1' 1 1 'V ■ le City agrees, 1 i-*' ■ -i* * 11 1; I1' 1 1 ^ ] - 1 f TO: FROM: DATC: SUBJECT: Planning Conmission ^ Council A. P. Olson, Asst, Zoning Administrator June 15, 1977 #275 Robert F. White - 320 Woodhill Road Subdivision (Preliminary) A^licant is requesting division of his existing 5 acre tract into two lots; the one with the existing house to have 2,7 acres, the one with a proposed house to have 2,3 acres, all dry. The division line is located where shown rS • location. The proposed lot would exceed ^0 ft. in width, but is OTly 140 ft, deep at the proposed house location, because of this, the applicant is also requesting a 20 ft. rear yard setback ^ri^e (from 50 ft. to 30 ft.) for the proposed house. The rear yard abutts the Woodhill Country Club property. No other structures are nearby. A septic system design has been submitted and sent to the City Engineer for his review. The division would be subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee and should include requirements for the private easement. A public hearing has been scheduled for July 5, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. PLANNING O>MISSI0N MEETING - July 5, 1977 Planning Conmission received copy of engineer’s review and approval. Oh the subdivision, Ae only concem Was the access problems on Wbodhill Road. Plann^g Coinnission wanted to ensure that access would always be over the existing driveway and that no new access would be developed. Reconmended approval of the subdivision subject to maintaining the existing access, to priding private easements for the access drive to each lot, and to a park dedication fee being paid. On the variance, there were questions about future development on the golf Vart^ce^^l^ fo^ no^reason could be found to require the setback vt,riance. COUNCIL MEETING - July 11, 1977 .^>proved preliminary plat subject to slight revision. Final plat should indicate egress easement as separate outlot for the purpose of eliminating any access problems in the future. Council was mfonned by Zoning Administrator that Planning Conmission had not acted on variance request due to lack of representation. Matter would be up for Planning Conmission review at next scheduled meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION - July 18, 1977 Setback variance denied. No representative present. No haixiship demonstrated. Preliminary plat previously approved. i: h ! t I# k . Robert F. Vhit Variance - Rea Pg 2 COUNCIL MEETIN Council reforr White (copy of rife IM* two lots; proposed ere shown uld exceed ocation. rd setback yard abutts ineer for dication Fee 1. On the Road. \rer the • A •existing ti lot, the golf Btback variance. (hould indicate tny access on had not luld be emonstrated. . Robert F. Vhite - 320 Woodhill Road Variance - Rear Yard Setback #275 CXXJNCIL MEETING - July 25, 1977 Coincil referred application back to Planning Gomnission at the request of Mr. White (copy of letter enclosed). aOBER * CHA1KMA^ mi i -r:; ^5 i Iiainaii ........................................ SHEDD-BROWN. INC. 8100 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 July 22, 1977 ROBERT F.WHITE • CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Orono Village Council P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 #275 Gentlemen: Last week the Planning Commission denied a variance request for an outlot that is being created on pro perty (320 Woodhill Road) where I reside presently. As I was not present at their meeting, and they had questions concerning the matter, the request may have been denied for that reason. It is my understanding I cannot appear before the Planning Commission with out first the Council consider the variance request. Please consider either granting the variance (for reasons set forth below) or directing me back to the Planning Commission for a hearing. Justification for variance request: As a widower I live in my present (ten bedroom, ten bathroom) house with two sons. The need is apparent for smaller quar ters. Having lived there for 16 years, I would like to remain. The unusual terrain (steep hill) permits only the creation of an outlot that is itself unusual (long and narrow with only one suitable building site). Because of the magnitude of the present house it needs a certain amount of land to support its value. While this is difficult to quantify I believe the saleabil:ty of the present structure is impaired if another is located "too close". While the 20 foot variance is not much in actual distance, each foot is important for the reasons stated. The affected property to the North is owned by Woodhill Country Club and is wooded. The likelihood of its use appears remote although there has been talk of some day putting up member condominixoms. This would re quire rezoning to use not consistent with the neighbor hood as constituted presently. m ‘-.X % IT” r' A1 to no Th ROBERT F. WHITE Although the following is not necessarily germane to your decisionf two architects have advised me not to build unless a variance is obtained. Thank you for considering my request Cordially , RFW;jw TD: FROM: D/V1B: RE: Mr. Jfyl of 2.22 of one 140 ft. assesse Both pr and the PLANNINC IXie to I to publj boihood. 1976 at PLANNING Result o were aga to withd: of the to defer the Lega] PLANNINC Reluctar requiren eliminat altemat ZONING ADM Mr. Tykstrj for wpprovi similar to A and B bol The street We should i properties Dedicationcation catiai of t TO:W. R. Benson FKM:H. F. MUhich ■DATE:November 26, 1975 RE:Phillip Dykstra - #73 Phillip I^kstra - 3080 North Shore Drive - Subdivision of 2^2 acres into^ paicrirMdi of iS" prop?*^ consisting of one acre. Both paieSs would exceed the sizo 140 ft. Following SipletiiTof SS requireawit of assessed for two units. ^ sewer project, this property was PLANNING QBMISSIGN MEETING - Deceiober 3, 1975 to*pSlic*opSion"o?Le*ressib^ltv*^f expressed concent as 1976 at 7:30 P.M. in the mi^ SalT ** PLANNING OGMUSSIGN MEETING - January 19, 1976 i^S^JglL^tte^piSpSsS^I; fiii the people present and three letters to withdraw subdi^^m proposal if aie*HL?t*^h"*‘ •’7*“*”' agreed of the lateral sei^r Sa?^are apprwiinately 1/2s.tS.tssi.r“ “ “^sts's'.jrss;!; sir' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - February 2, 1976 recommended approval as proposal meets all zoning eliminated.^ Also^LggLted^cLncU should bealternatives. ^^^gg^sted Council review any and all possible ZONING AEMINISTRATOR - March 25, 1976 for Hiiproval^of S^Fin^ Wat^*^e*mri ^**ri*"^^**^ 2^ proposed subdivision -rvey. prepemes^ ^rS bX, prirtledges are United to lakesho?; Page 2 Phillip Itykstra 3080 North Shore Drive Subdivision PLANNING OMISSION MEETING - April 5, 1976 The Cononission recommended to the Council approval of the final plat of the Registered Land Survey of Phillip Dykstra with stipulation added to Ae plat ^at no easement be granted from Lot B to the lake, if this pro^dure is ® correct by the City legal staff, and any other procedure advised by the legal staff that woule ensure this provision and also, that approval be subject to payment of the Park Dedication Fee. COUNCIL MEETING - April 12, 1976 The Council approved the Final Plat.subject to payment of $2,000 park dedication fee. STAFF - July 18, 1977 This final plat was previously approved by Council on April 12, 1976. resolution and plat have been signed, but no one ever paid the park dedication fee so as to satisfy all the conditions of the resolution for proper recording. I have heard nothing from the applicant, Mr. Dykstra, since that tune. Just recently, Mr. Reardon, a recent purchaser of the property, resubmitted mylars and hardshells of the original plat as approved. Copies of the preliminary and final plats are enclosed as well as copies of the Planning Commission and Council minutes and the resolution approving the previous final plat. Since the process was never completed, I believe it should go back to both Planning Commission and Council for approval. Mr. Reardon does have a tendency to twist instructions and directions. Remember, the previous approval was given subject to no lake access easement be given for Lot B. t of the the plat that found to be the legal object to rk dedication 6. The dedication T recording. jne. Just :ted mylars diminary and Lon and Council to both ms. i easement be m ■ I f • it - )o GREATER MINNEAPOLIS AREA BOARD OF REALTORS * * ft A a ft 0ft a ft ft F I K E ^9 - _ « »1977 E MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE X I n. sorth Shore Drire. Orono LOT DIST. NO_ADPWJ:^- terms ----CSllL. SI-lA ODOR-----±LJt VACANT LAND JUES. DIST. NO. ■577,000 w/t*nni» court# listing KEALTOgS .phone .*73-2555 L.IS 1 ING BKLFMim A7^ 2177/47^ 9494 »US«,H »-«»T — ____________ LOCATED IN-----?!£!»ztr.i prlvilws with dL»cretion of Stiect Suriicini-----BT»cktO£^.Curb Cuncf.Storm ScftCT. Sea UitarLegal Descxipiioii---- Lot AVi/rox* 1 Acre 7^;,, B«*ia«Wtl»T School* Ekm___QrqSS---------------if. H.»K_«IEES---------S». Hijh------------- Sewer In Street—ISA.Water: In Street..Gai In Street. 4 L Tu.»«Sp.[.hD«>.l>____H-tff----------------( ) NHS 1~1.W I. T.J ( ) V» Total Unpaid Speciah %------------------------------------------------------ Break Down-----HZ^—------------------------------------------------------------ Proent Financing HekS By Jnt Rate.>1onthly Paymenii— ------------------------------------------- . Mia MUMlEltS ONLY. INFOHMATION I-CONFIDCXnAL Mtea-r-ib Arm. ft«ri mt .fti I AND OMISSIONS. TW «a» 1 ■—----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Foni 103-W3 ■.:.AiL:k3» -v:* fltK , ii. I 11^^ k V exist! V regulj the C] » divisi Orono Count) 1 divisi In thi of On Dat'id ATIhS' Waite Qerk. T i RESOLUTION NO. 672 *’A RESOLUTION APPROVING TOE REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a ntinicipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a sub division plat for Registered Land Survey No. _ _by Phillip Dykstra; NOW, TOEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves th plat for Registered L^d Survey No. t Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the Paric Dedication Fee being paid. This resolution will expire on October 12, 1976, if the aforesaid division plat has not been filed with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision approval. Dated this i:>th day of Apr»i i , 1976. Robert L. searies. Mayor ATTEST: Writer R. Be^( Qerk/Administrator . STATE COUNTY CITY 0 of the correc of Oro Survey tor, C " v:. . . ,_u Dated ed and bdi vision I within a sub- City of , Hennepin (said siib- iT of Titles, i the City . STAIE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN cm OF OHDNO if: The undersigned duly qualified and acting City CleTic/Adninistrator of the City of Orono hereby certifies that attadied hereto is a true and correct copy of the original Resolution passed by the City Council of City of Orono on April 12 , 1976, approving the Registered Land Survey No. Plat on file in the office of the City Cleric/Administra- tor, City of Oronof Walter Qerk/Adminis Dated this i3iih day of April , 1976. f i 1* '•V, % ¥ •f if ' MINUTES OF A REGU The Gonnission tu petition for a va in order to put a plained that the i dining roan and a would be 66 ft. ai stated that there cept as presented er^ to remove an lake^ore and rep! Administrator est: of 200 sq. ft. of that the Planning of the lake^ore i Rowlette conditioi being replaced by would gain a 200 * (6) - Nays (0).' « • • # Van Nest moved, Di reconanend to the ( Registered Land Si added to the Plat the lake, if this legal staff, or ar that would ensure subject to paymenl (6) - Nays (0). Hake moved, Hannah comnend to the Cou stniction Ooopany ject to paym^ oi exceed the ndniiiur - Nays (0). The Zoning Adminis Agency draft of th to be reviewed wit had a family emerg tend. The Conmiss lar meeting. At the Planning Co the woxic session r Use Permit for the rant at the presen Navarre. The Zonij with Hennepin Goisi egress 6f howeverj a fty RoadW. -l^ arrfa^ements^ cbSili idnistrator me and L of City td Land Vdministra* MmjTES OF A REGULAR PLANONG OCmSSION MEETING HELD APRIL 5, 1976 • PAGE 4. The Gonnission turned their attention to Richard Roi^lett's petition for a variance on lakeshoxe and street setback in order to put an addition onto his existing home. He ex plained that the addition of 36* x 28* would consist of a dining xoan and a garage. The proposed lakeshoxe setback would be 66 ft. and 23 ft. from the street property line. He stated that there was no other place on the lot to do this ex cept as presented. As a coo4)ensation to the City, he volunte- ei^ to remove an existing 20* x 20* concrete patio facing the lakeshoxe and replace it idth an open redwood deck. The Zoning Administrator estimated that this would result in a net decrease of 200 sq. ft. of hardcover. Hake moved, McDonald seconded, that the Planning Comnission reconraend to the Council approval of the lakeshoxe and street setback variance request of Ridiard Rowlette conditional upon removal of the 20* x 20* concrete deck being replaced by a ncn-pervious type deck because the City would gain a 200 sq. ft. decrease in hardcover. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).' r . T RICHARD RCMfTT 3775 BAySIlE ROAD VARIANCE - LAKESHDRB AND STREET SETBAOC « • • # Van Nest moved, Dunlap seconded, that the Planning Comnission reccmanend to the Council approv^ of the Final Plat of the Registered Land Survey of Phillip Dykstra with stipulation added to the Plat that no easement be. granted from Lot B to the lake, if this procedure is found to be correct by the City legal staff, or any other procedure advised by the legal staff PHILLIP 3080 NORTH SHORE DRIVE FINAL PLAT * ‘' .. i ' i. . • that would ensure this provision and also, that approval be subject to payment of tne Paik Dedication Fee. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). Hake moved, Hannah seconded, that the Planning Comnission re commend to the Council that the Final Plat of the Ulmer Con struction Company ^titledJ"Ulmer Estates" be approved sub ject to psymmtt of the Park Dedication Fee as both parcels exceed the ndninun two acre requirement. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). UIMER CONSTRUCTION 00. 70 8 190 Wllim KOVB NORTH FINAL PLAT '^-WMBR BSt The Zoning Administrator called attention to the Planning Agency draft of the Multi-Family Ordinance that was schediled to be reviewed with the Planner. He explained that John Bergley had a family emergmey earlier in the day and was unable to at tend. The Comnission tabled the review until their next regu lar meeting. MULH-FAMILY ORDINANCE At the Planning Commission's request, John Lamb in appeared at the work session review of his applicatimi for a Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of constructing a Burger King Restau rant at the present site of the Martins Texaco Station in * Navarre. The Zoning Adninistrator related, from his meetings with Hennepin CoiAty personnel, that ttiey would not permit any howev^,,> W aq- acfcfes Ootitty RDad 'ffo.'ly^to Burg^ Ring atold be' acceptable* if aurrfV^emeitits^cbQa made with the Calvary Memorial Church JOW LAMBIN (BURGER KING) 3340 SHORELINE DRIVE dWDITICNAI- USE PERMIT O In "'L rSV b-' ■•' '' -Z J V 'A ^■4 . ‘ '. , It u ORONO COUNCIL Paurus moved, variance reque side Road, be Commission min to a correct d Motion, • Ayes ( Paurus moved, #672, A rjsolu Survey No• _ of the Park De $2,000. Motio Massengale mov #673, A Resolu Plat, be adopt Park Dedicatio Motion, Ayes ( Henry Muhich, informed the C are submitting Hill Street as enclosure and way. A similar prop Commission and We informed th he requested w< submitted. The existing g< probably could enclosure coul< be moved. I would recomm< v;ould result ii east. A public hearii Planning Commit The Planning C< to be held on I Planning Commis Jerry Snyder, i appeared at thi that the Commis fo® the Escos. of the existin< 4. 3WLETT UE ROAD - LAKESH)RB AND SEIBAOC i SHQR]r 3 DRIVE I*1 ^TRKTION QO. niiai navBNCKni r i-tiucR ESC IL- [LY ORDINANCE [N CBURGER KING) 3LINB IMOVE Sis USE PERMIT \L k'P ‘ V V , M- w- 1 ‘ r 1' V ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1976 Paurus moved, Massengale seconded, that the variance request of Richard Rowlette, 3775 Bay- side Road, be approved as per the Planning Commission minutes of April 5, 1976, subject to a correct deed being filed by Mr. Betz. Motion, • Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Paurus moved, Butler seconded, that Resolution #672, A Pjsolutioh Approving The Registered Land Survey No. , b^ adopted# subject to the payment of the Park Dedication FeO in the amount of $2,000. Motion# Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Massengale moved, Butler seconded, that Resolution #673, A Resolution Approving The lilmer Estates Plat, be adopted, subject to the payment of the Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $800. Motion, Ayes (4) -* Nays (0) i , Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, informed the City Council that I4r. & Mrs. Esco are submitting a reqiiest to vadate a portion of Hill Street as his ekisting well, side entry enclosure and garage are located on the right-of- way . A similar proposal was denied by the Planning Commission and Council on February 12, 1973. We informed the apj^licant's counsel of this but he requested we proceed with the proposal as submitted. The existing garage is in need of repair and probcd>ly could be removed or moved. The entry enclosure could be removed and the v/ell could be moved. I would recommend against this vacation as it v7ould result in landlocking the property to the east. A public hearing should be scheduled. Planning Commission Meeting - March 1, 1976 The Planning Commission scheduled a public hearing to be held on Monday, April 5, 1976 at 7:30 P.M. Planning Commission Meeting - April 5, 1976 Jerry Snyder, attorney representing the applicant, appeared at the public hearing and requested that the Commission review the survey prepared fOK the Escos. It showed the garage and a portion of the existing house, including the well. Page 4 VARIANCE 3775 Dayside Road (Continued) RESOLUTION #672 RLS #_ _ 3080 North Shore Drive RESOLUTION #673 Ulmer Estates Plat 70 $t 190 Willow Drive N. STREET VACATION Hill Street 300 Crestview Avenue ■ ■■ ■ (Continued) Page 4 CE ayside Road nued) TION #672 orth Shore Drive TION #673 Estates Plat 90 Willow Drive N, 'kk. 1 n V VACATION treet estview Avenue t i 4 4 V*- <A ■ ■3^^ I W nued) I '^-^4 i nt±iJrj'.n REGiST£fiED LAND Z haraligr artif)|i that la aaaoidai V MiwMota Statute of 1949 mm i daaerlbad tvmet of laid la tl ^ Miaaaaota, to witi Ihoaa | O and of Lot X, Bloek 2 jL IX, 12, 13, U, and 15 A iNtf EOMjtElyrr^ hoiavlad and doaeri' aid* liM lotted as L aastarly f lorthaas CrjaU ✓ ><. at i=>xa /?/f ^nchmmrSt ^ 0m €0f§90 ‘0«0 ffANN000n00 ta aiag point Soutbaaa 527.6 foot arljr aids 11 shall ba knowB NSTD-Z^E^. tO0 Noy^mhfr 20, t97S fr-0n monummn^ i? ’ -A. olds Una of said V'* Moartfaerlgr aids Una ; of 225 faat to a poialf W V «!«»« tha Hortharly ' a- ^ Eaatorly oornar of Lot 12, thaaca llorthwaatarly along a anglo of 89®41* with tha Nortfc Rorthwatorlj Una of Lot 10, B) tha Soutbarly ahora Una of vaatarlj a diatanoa of 156 faat nore of Lota 10, U, and 12, Block 1, and a p fiaxwall Straat Taoatad, and along tha Be In said dyatal Bay Plark, to tha intaraael lot 1, Block 2, with tha Borthuaatarly axtai point "A«j thenoa Soutbaastarly along aaid axl tha plat tharaof on file or of record In tha ofl for said Ooiotyj that tha Borthaastarly bonndaiy i Judicial LaodaarkB aat pursuant to Bistriet Court (h shown heraon ia a eorraet dalinaation of said a Gordon R. Ooffln Tmi>A ftn-vnnror and Pla ■aiP- ’-v .Su'- ■’^1 1)1 * Jack Rhode - 14K Variance Page 3 PLANNING COWISS; Still waiting foi PLANNING OCmiSS] Tabled. No new i PLANNING OOKMISS] Hie Zoning Admini his application, of the year. Hoi< he is able. Comn PLANNING C0M4ISSI Tabled for revise of April 18, 1977 PLANNING OCJtflSSI Tabled. STAFF - April 12, Mr. Rhode has subi with house locatic enclosing copies < I checked the sit< far foxward than i 30* setback line i It ni^t be best t proposed location We might also cons 22, 1974, (copy ol At that time, remc could require this Because of the ren PLANNING OO^SSIC Mr. Rhode and nei{ indicated objectic in 1974 was con^t multiple dock cn p owners havi^'^g lake conforming. 3^' -MM T3 'GfSr£ff£0 LANIt wmriltf that la aatmnrtii tft SttttatM of 1949 os i Ibod tvoot of UmA im tl oooeto, to vlti HioM ] ^ HLook 2 U, 12, 13, U, and 15 boioMiod oBd dooeri' bioh point ohol •rljr oido Ujm plattod os L •ostorlj f: llortbsos Crjoto >' st 527.6 foot orijr aids 11 ^U •ootorlj trtm po sido lino of sold MartfaarXx sido lino af 225 foot to o poiat od olonc tho Borthorljj •rlf oomor of Lot 12, Worthwostorljr along a a9®41* with tho Port!: rlj lino of Lot 10, El f shoro lino of Mozwol kanoa of 156 foot nors ftBd 12, Block 1, OBd a itod, OBd along tho Pc ^^k, to tho intorsoel M Porthwostorl^ ortoi latorlj ’ along said oxl r of racord in tho off rthoostorljr bonndorT’ < t to ULstrlet Court (k itiOB of said y- % V V % V A Jk Jack Rhode - 1410 Bohns Point Road Variance Page 3 PLAI^^ING OMaSSICN MEETING - January 17, 1977 Still vfaiting for revised plan. PLANNING OOMSSION MEETING - February 22, 1977 jrr CTT /. < i Tabled. No new material. PLANNING OMaSSICN - March 7, 1977 The Zoni^ Adbninistrator stated that he had contacted Mr. Rhode regarding the star.us of his application. He was advised that Mr. Rhode suffered a heart attack at the beginning of the year. However, Mr. Rhode still plans on submitting a revised proposal as soon as he is able. Commission tabled this application until the necessary data is received. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - ^ 21, 1977 Tabled for revised plans, ^ould be conplete in time for Planning Conmission meeting of April 18, 1977. ^ PLANNING COrtllSSION MEETING - April 4, 1977 T^led. STAFF - April 12, 1977 Mr. Rhode has submitted a revised proposal and site plan including the adjoining properties with house locations. He is still requesting the use of the existing structure. I*m enclosing copies of this revised proposal and plan. I checked the site again and feel the proposed location of the house may be a little too far forward tlw necessary. I also believe that moving the house location back to the 30* setback line would result in an encroachment on the Laier's to the west. It might be best to oonproraise and locate the front of the house midway between tiie proposed location and the average setback line as shown on ny sketch "Esdiibit A". We might also consider sticking to the conditions set forth by the Council on October 22, 1974, (copy of minutes enclosed) vMien a variance on this lot was first approved. At that time, removal of the old garage was one of the conditions of approval. We could require this again. Because of the revised proposal, I iiaw moved this item back as a work session item. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - May 2, 1977 Rhode and neighbors Mr. Becker and Mr. § Mrs. Lauer were present. Ccmmissian udicated objection to retain existing carriage house. Similar variance approved in 1974 was conditioned on removal of carriage house - also indicated objection to dock on property. Suggested one main dock for use of surrounding property owners having lake access easement across subject property (grandfather - legal non- con forming. I, I » / % I Jack Rhode - 141 Varianccf Page 4 Extremely long c progress in det< agree on locatic Planning Goninis! another revised location and eli Mr. Rhode requef of town at the i all interested ] PLANNING OOMMIS; Tabled - no new STAFF - July 20 Enclosed is a c location of the with the front windows. I'm also enclos Gregg Hannah, when items come and stamped whe when neighbors mm ! V the status of : the beginning sal as soon as s received. icm meeting lining properties :ture. I'm i a little too back to the t. tween the )it A". on October approved, /al. We sion item. mss ion pproved :tion to property Legal non- { m #210Jack Rhode - 1410 Bohns Point Road Variance' Page 4 Extremely long discussion followed regarding location of proposed dwelling. Not m progress in deteimining satisfactory location. The three interested parties could agree on location. nuch not Haimiiic Onmission finally tabled the application and suggested Mr. si^t another revised plan indicating dimensions froa lakeshore in order to deteimine actual location and eliminate any future controversy. Mr. Rhode requested deferring action until June 6, 1977, as he was schedul^ to be out of town at the time of our next scheduled meeting. Notices of meeting would be sent to all interest^ parties. PLANNING OMflSSION MEETING - June 6, 1977 Tabled - no new infoimation from applicant. STAFF - July 20, 1977 Enclosed is a copy of a revised proposal by Mr. Rhode. Ite has moved the proposed location of the house back 35 ft. from his original plan. The front edge is in line with the front edge of the Becker house. This west wall of the Becker house has no windows. I'm also enclosing a copy of a letter from Mr. Becker to Plying Commission member Gregg Hannah. Please NOTE the notations I made in the margins. Neif^bors are notified when items come for action. We make copies of all envelopes after they are addressed and stamped whenever we send out notices (enclosed are copies of addressed envelopes when neighbors were notified). Not midi s could not submit mine actual d to be out d be sent to ropbsed Ls in line se has no on member are notified are addressed envelopes .•1*- 'A 7^ M Cl P C P Cl I Jc SI” ti le ti 32 Ci I Cl pr th in ab re wi- th« cor isl fan 802 a \ "d€ My can fti' tJASON C. BEC41ER 3I4E NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA.MINNESOTA EE3SI July 6, 1977 ^'.1 Mr. Gregg Hannah Chairman Planning Commission City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Gregg: I recently attended a meeting of the Planning Commission at which Jack Rhode, the owner of a lot adjacent to my property at 3145 North Shore Drive, presented plans to build a house on the property. At this meeting the Commission came very close to voting in favor of al lowing him to build a house nearly adjacent to mine. Had this loca- approved, it would have been in violation of Zoning Ordinance 32 201 as well as the variance granted by the Planning Commission and City Council on October 15, 1974, and October 22, 1974, respectively. I have carefully read the pertinent sections of the Zoning Code of the City of Orono and know that it is the intention of the Code to protect property owners, such as myself. For example, the Code specifies that the effect on values and property in the surrounding area will be taken into consideration before variances are issued (32.240). The Code talks about the need "to protect adjacent property" (32.240)(e). The Code “disastrous affects of intense residential development Orono" and about the guiding principle of "avoiding the ill-effects of over-crowding" (30.030). The Code talks about "undue concentra^on of structures" (30.030). Further, the Code says that ex isting lots of less than one acre with sewer may be utilized for single family dwelling purposes without Council approval if the area is within o0% of the requirements of the Zoning Code (31.202). The Code says that a variance may not be granted as a "convenience" but only to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty" (31.340). My basic problem with respect to the home I purchased on September 4, 1974, can be summarized as follows: II •i 7>y/5 5; liJjL da u/crk J ne.MS - jr£AiS - COPiBS sekr tmch ' ACtlOtJ p/iloR T~ CoPtB^ ' PlltJvT£ S OBC "3.0 MAy X H eeri rne pueAS 7k Ar boT** AcnoP^ - which 145 North ty. At vor of al- his loca- ng Ordinance ission and pectively. Code of the to protect :ifies that ill be taken le Code talks The Code /elopment “avoiding about “undue lys that ex- 1 for single ia is within )de says that ► alleviate itember 4, 1974, Mr. Gregg Hannah Page 2 July 6, 1977 I s /? /• r frrts ^7^^^ / ^7 A{/aR/\G ^ C> 7~ff £/t « / A4/1 ^ jo>\ ^ ^ 1 c . /S rX*i/£ i9 7tf vuAB Gft/BAJ subject Ta A'o orM£n 7//VG S7AATp RG(/£R '///'ye* A i/ f? /X rz. xr C/^ t* / m ^ 1. ^ r ^ -X ut: , /9 /J ^ ® ^ ^ PAOfi^S^ L s APPRo\ft9 and the City Council on October IR «onU on? ■ «« approved condi- a.other variance but lot size and width be allowed. b. The present house be razed by August 1, I975. 7>y/5 5 TAieHhv^ f, Jhe^barn be razed as soon as a new residence is con- do 'no'f ^ 7\of(-fy y)etji*hor^ wcrk fesfto^ nBMS — p-oti ACTtOU jrepis------ BNck^^EO 3 y/z^frS cP caPt£^ SBpr ^*^ 2. ro T/pY'*'^^ thch ‘"t ACTtOH pRloR T O MAt-7^ 3. tioTtl CoPt^^ ^P Aj/A/i^r^s oe.c JLO R- Mpy ^ I believe that as an adjacent property owner I shoulH h^uo Planning Colissirind ihf?ny S?Er? SiKfsr:' be?i Lr the"?a«^ha? ^ ?^wa^ ’ "r'"® V”' Hotr a‘?d" d^s^^^a^r?or.y“''°"° PY1C+C z»c- u XL '» then I think a Questionexists as to whether or not the variance is ct-fii ® ’s necessary. attended a? which Mi^ h ® ‘^°""^“'°n at the meeting I approve the loMtion'of m? ^is plans was to it violated hn?h ? ” Rhode's proposed new home even if tober. 1974. with respe"rto Sfdinancr-M^aSff ®r?a1? lo °'l and"since“it adJersel^lffects ahouid be allowed ”"' therefore, have t^object until s,,rhT^ ^ strate to me that a vio?at?e^ nf^K ‘^an demonis necessarv ''’Nation of the aforementioned ordinance pr BotR AcnoP^4. my%"?operty!" ?h"ir?lsuUrtf ?am?l •" ’“'"''2^?’^ adjacent to driving ove;^ my propertv or hefn^ either Should another^Sus^ be^e?e"c?ir?n’t"he‘'’?onixr?: Mr. Page July I d( The: fam pe pro wan tio tai my Sir pur the ser . S Af*fiRo\/tp A/G THfS :tober 15, a vari- : Road, d condi- 1 owed. s con- 3uld have :ity of 'd prior ‘allure to ►tection lover, I ty of Orono for my not met question n exis- a variance meeting I > was to ne even if :ed in Oc- lil to un- ill owed would, can demon ordinance jacent to Sts either icinity. ine, more iy .f \ r*- Mr. Gregg Hannah Page 3 July 6, 1977 a^alreadi^^owded'^ndn^^^^ rase^^ts^nd parti al 1y resul« "9 . f »° im»«« cSngertioi anS noise level In the i™,ed1ate area. 5. me "in the boat" on his new house. I do not wish to be "7b“„'’;ery IccomlIlodSt1ng‘’to^rand'"nf'They are all fine people who have been very acco^ooa^ family. However, I have J,"''®® ...j, .yms of money to Improve my perty and have been Investing additional sums or money p ;i”ir Su ,r».. .ai,. ,f M. .• my expense since I do not believe a f '’“’^^aHng®?J^^rtrt*rva?1a^^ 'th^nexf s?ep'*1 ?SS?d’hopeTo'be contacted so my viewpoint Is repre- sented at the hearing. Yours truly. JCB/hh Ac^^. . -n- \ • hflNiniES OF A PLAl^ The Zoning Adminis ^ple H|ll siibdivi subdivision and th Mr, Novotny, adjoi Planning Commissio originally zoned 1 acre in January of would probably be Hassel moved, McDo subject to a park tional land availa Motion - Ayes (6), i.i Mr. Keith Sjodin, the Planning Ccmmi Mr. Sjodin indicat Lots 6 and 7 to ca sites. As with Mr indicated to Mr. S rearrangement was would be possible 1 ■: i'. The Planning Conmi! matter had been tal the status of the j Oiairman Hannah am cipating in this di chaired this item. The Zoning Admin isl requesting a variar similar variance We the same lot. ^pi on the removal of 1 posal requests the The Planning Commis plan with Mr. Rhode Mr. Becker and Mr. I appears to be a lit moving the house Ic line would result i to the west. The Z I that it might be be locate the front of proposed location a ■nmwii ity adding to ig from the er of families ched to say 1 add to the a. on his proposed to try to get bors very much. to me and my ney in my pro- I improve my on that I don't >perty evalua- ^amily. Cer- Commission at ts on the lot a variance is lint is repre- tsbee, and Hansen mm- *Hiii ^aNUTES OF A PLANNING C».^^SSICIN MEETING HELD MAY 2, 1977 - PAGE 4 *v' ^ A? The Zoning Administrator stated that the applicant is requesting a lot area and width variance on a lot in the ^ple Hjll subdivision. This is the last lot of the subdivision and the area is sewered. Mr. Novotny, adjoining property owner, was present. Hie Planning Comnission explained to him that this area was originally zoned 1/2 acre. This area was rezoned to one acre in January of 1975 with the understanding that it would probably be necessary to grant some variances. Hassel moved, McDonald seconded, to approve this variance s^ject to a park dedication fee and there is no addi tional land available. Motion - Ayes (6), Nays (0). Mr. Keith Sjodin, Attorney for Waconia Homes, arrived and the Planning Commission discussed this proposal with him. Mr. Sjodin indicated Waconia Homes interest in purchasing Lots 6 and 7 to confcine with Lots 1-5 as two building sites. As with Mr, Doerfler, the Planning Commission indicated to Mr. Sjodin that regardless of idiat lot rearrangement was negotiated, only two building sites would be possible for the entire block (Lots 1-10). The Planning Comnission informed Mr. Sjodin that this matter had been tabled to allow time for checking into the status of the property. Chairman Hannah announced that he would not be parti cipating in this discussion and hfeniber IfcDonald chaired this item. The Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Rhode is r^uesting a variance on a substandard lot. A similar variance was approved several years ago on the same lot. ^proval at that time was conditioned on the removal of the carriage nouse. Current pro posal requests the use of the existing structure. The Planning Cammission reviewed the revised site plan with Mr. Rhode and the two adjoining neighbors, Mr. Becker and Mr. ^ Mrs. Lauer. Proposed site appears to be a little too far forward. However, moving the house location back to the 30* setback line would result in an encroachment on the Lauer*s to the west. The Zoning Administrator suggested that it might be best to come to a happy medium and locate the front of the house midway between the proposed location and the average setback line. KEN ROELOFS * 2605 LYDIARD CIRCLE VARIANCE - LOT AREA ^ WIDn| (1252) VIRGIL DOERFLER 4799 TONKA VIEW VARIANCE - LOT AREA (#249) JACK RHODE 1410 BOHNS POINT ROAD VARIANCE - LOT AREA 6 WIDTH REVISED PLANS (#210) mlwiiii «mmw.^T k OF A PUNNING CChWlSSlON ^EErING HELD MAY 2, 1977 - PAGE 5 Mr Lauer had no qualms about the location of Mr. Code's H(wev2r, he did feel that the lot was too smJu^contain both the carriage house and the proposed dwelling. JACK RHODE (continued)* (#210) Mr Becker also objected to the use of the wrriage house. Ite*too felt that the lot was too ^11 and this would Vi.- <.r«*itiA. He exnressed his objecticn to the Sfge ifusf rho°ufdre fo^^^^ the propo^d ctnicture should be located near tnis spot, me & Administrator reminded Mr. be is encroaching Mr. Lauer*s property n^. It woiu better to locate the dwelling where there would be th least amount of encroachment. A long discussion followed regarfing the - the proposed ^ellrog. Not Jrtl^uld 3: l-aaon*. ^oi: S^ted »at^e would be willing to go alung with the suggestion of the ^or^ng Adild^tratOT which was midway be^een the proposed i~-=tinn and the ave-age setback line. Planning Coraraissiem indicated the^ f OTC main dock for use of surrounding prope^ owners having lake^ccess easement across subject property. iS--rLt failed for lack of a second. Hassel moved. Hosfield seconded, to deny vari^e and that a new application be submitted. Moticn failed. *»* -.w- ^r£- - Guthrie moved, Pesek seconded, that the application be approved ^iect to the house being setback a distance ?f frrm the lake as suggested by the zoning administrator nu^ay between 75' lakeshore and ave«^ lof area°Lf^^ te^grantld; ^rjolk on this property; and subject to a park dedication fee. artet some discussion, Guthrie withdrew his motion. Hassel^en ™vtd tHabie 1*1 application and suggested Mr. I^ode s^^t another revised plan indicating dimensions from lakeshore ro ro^ermiSe actual location and eliminate any future controversy. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). ■ ■ g ^ X V ^0 A MW • -- - — w Ur Rhode stated that he was scheduled to be out of town ^rrog ^ sSeSSled meeting and that he would submit a revised proposal for the June 6, 1977, meeting. f - : * w* • ; > minutes of a PLA^ Mr. Ledstrom was of his horses in located only 50* that this is real A previous owner would like the gc eliminate the haz eliminate that ha shed District is watershed storage as to whether or lies within this that the applican District as to wh« be affected by th After a brief disi table this applies next meeting and ; District concemii Nays (0). The Zoi existing elevatior submitted by Mr. I Attorney Lorens Bi sick. The Zoning the applicant is i standard lot. A \ necessary. There use permit would b house as second dw Mr. Brynestad stat following: 1. 2. 3. Permission of ' into guest hou Peimit to proc on premises. Be able to put property. Adjoining property Becker*s objected posed location is Commission was cor structures on this and remodeling exi structure and buil the lake. Pesek moved, Hosf; suggested the app] ing only one resic proposed house loc residence to meet only with sufficic parties vho had dc City's adoption ol Ayes (5), Nays (0) f. MINUTCS OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD DECEMBER 20, 1976 - PAGE 5 Mr, Ledstron was present. He is conceined about the safety of his horses in this pasture. Proposed duck pond is l^ated only 50* from horse bam. Mr. Ledstron stated that this is really a muck hole and a hazard to the horses. A previous owner almost had a horse mired in the mud. He would like the go ahead to fill along the steep hill to elimmate the hazardous drop and excavate the muck area to eliminate that hazard. Hank Miahich stated that the Water shed District is in the process of designating flood and watershed storage areas. There appears to be some question as to vhether or not the location of the proposed duck pond lies within this designated area. The Council requested that ^e applicant obtain a report from the Watershed District as to whether or not this proposed duck pond would be affected by this storage area impounding project. After a brief discussion, Pesek moved, Woolley seconded, to table this application to alloiv staff to inspect by the next feting and a report is submitted from the Watershed District concerning the storage area. Motion - Ayes (6), Nays {O'). The Zoning Administrator stated that a topog of existing elevation and proposed amount of fill should be submitted by Mr. Ledstrora. Attorney Lorens Biynestad represented Mr. Rhode who was sick. The Zonmg Administrator informed the Commission that the ^Tplicant is requesting approval to build on this sub standard lot. A variance on lot area and width would be necessary. There is no other land available. A conditional use permit would be necessary to keep the existing carriage house as second dwelling to be used as a guest house. Mr. Brynestad stated that his client is requesting the follcwing: 1. 2. 3. Permission of Comnission to renovate the carriage house into guest house. Peimit to proceed with construction of a residence on premises. Be able to put dock out into lake to serve this property. Mjoining property owner Jason Becker was present. The Becker s objected to the proposed lakeshore setback. Pre ssed l^ation is slightly foiward of the Becker’s. Comnission was COTcemed about the possibility of two st^ctures OT this lot. Commission suggested restoring and remodeling existing carriage house or to raze this structure and build a new residence further back from the l^e. Pesek moved, Hosfield seconded, to table this matter and suggested the applicant submit a revised proposal contain- mg only one residence, a statement of no objection to proposed house location from adjoining neighbors, new residence to meet side ^d rear setback requirements, dock slips to accommodate dock ri^ts of »c easements over the property prior to the City’s ^option of the new dock regulation. Motion - RICHARD LEDSTRCM 3465 SIXTH AVENUE N. WETLANDS VARIANCE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DUCK vcm (#209) JACK RHODE 1410 BOHNS POINT ROAD VARIANCE - LOT AREA ^ WIDTH AND SECOND DOCK CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - GUEST HOUSE (#210) I 'V.1*^ I TO: FRCM: DATE: SUBJECT: p: Hi Ji W; G COUNCIL MEET Mr. Wear prei auto tire sa! required. Si siinnit neces: CoRinissicn ai PLANNING CGM Mr. Wear was action until STAFF - July Mr. Wear’s pi comnercial bi conditional i Wear is cons: second condil for auto sen ing lot. He sii>ject propi STAFF - July Received the DSTRCM I AVENUE N. ARIANCE - L USE PERMIT - POINT ROAD LOT AREA 5 SECOND DOCK L USE PERMIT FR04: Planning Coimission and Council Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator July 12, 1977 #29 William Wear • 2120 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Permit COUNCIL MEETING - July 11, 1977 Mr. Wear presented letter requesting approval to use existing building for retail auto tire sales and service. Council deteimined a conditional use peimit would be required. Suggested applicant file application for conditional use peimit and submit necessary data with application. Follow regular procedures (Planning Ccmnissicn and Council). PLANNING Ct>WISSIQN - July 18, 1977 Mr. Wear was present. Requested early cons action until they mi^t nake a site review. STAFF - July 20, 1977 Mr. Wear's property consists of two parcels. Ohe of these contains the unfinished comnercial building and gas station operation for idiich he previously obtained a conditional use permit. The second parcel contains the structure from which Mr. VUear is considering auto service and repair and tire sales subject to obtaining a second conditional use peimit. He feels the operation would provide a facility for auto servicing which would relate with the current gas services on the adjoin ing lot. He has not as yet submitted a list of owner's within 300 ft. of the subject property. STAFF - July 27, 1977 Received the certified list of property owners from Mrs. Wear. Copy enclosed. #1 rv W ■f w * i -i r Hi- . 1 J- ' j i w r"*|l ! MK/ea LONG LAKE, h July 11th, 1977 Orono City Counc Orono, Minnesota Gentlemen: Your permission 12 as a garage f Yours very trulj Bill Wear rntmmmm- ! for retail mit would be irmit and anning sion deferred le unfinished obtained a i which Mr. obtaining a L facility i the adjoin- of the inclosed. mm V : .‘‘Sp II t u ’/ ■ &iU Wea/t>Excavating - Grading - Sand - Gravel - Dirt LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA GREENWOOD 3-7047 July 11th, 1977 #291 Orono City Council Orono, Minnesota Gentlemen: Your permission is requested for the continual use of the building located on Highway 12 as a garage for the sales, installation and service of automotive tires. ii 1^- HCBS4 NAME liacQ sAerpi ^ iO>-V\^^ ).Am )SJ1 I • y on Highway h'"’.1%■ ■«: '‘‘•m DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST .MMr- -mtm.s 0>ror\Q ADDRESS LOT TT^>vJS<v ]c^)^ 7^ BLK.PARCEL__i ^sssoBsasssssscsin —^J \\v\p|\VV^fS&^^^^Vcg^vV \|>nrvfcfUaVe. ipa\\-QOyLo>^ '^O. ? 'D V ^Ti,5o-»d ?*> ■ ^4:- V^v- . U-^We. %i^iAo . Cpigc k\ ^•sw -oNoo^lS-. L F©^A'C'r«ct4>'^'l/>C » r»‘^,'COVY\ tk^-i alJ (y\7^ Tv ^Aof A-,V^, O l -jV-VoAu A ^QOCI V';- SUBJECT: Lix:; Sub< Mr. Strong is : 9* acre parcel which would ex< William Waldro] west is consid parcel will be Access to this his other prop Although no va may be some pr setbacks of 50 and bam would A public hcari ~^'ror>Q DT BLK. PARCEL ?SDo^_ \f ■: .'U *P r-r ■;r#- rI lii , ’ ! 1 Planning Conmission § Council FROM:Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator #290 DATE; SUBJECT July 21, 1977 Lucian Strong * 1860 Fox Street Subdivision (Preliminary) Mr. Strong is requesting preliminary approval of the proposed lot split J'is 9+ acie parcel (1850). The proposed split would result in two parcels each of which would exceed the minimum 2-acre area requirement. "£VT. SJXSI ’Ss’fflS.K.?ttL'5:. parcel will be a separate parcel. Access to this new parcel will be provided through a private easement throu^ his other property (parcel 1825). AlthouA no variances would be required with the plattwg of the pro^rty, th^ may be some problem with locating a new residence which would meet the reqiured setbacks of 50 ft. front and rear and 30 ft. side. The existing tennis court and bam would require variances on the setbacks as they exist. A public hearing has been scheduled for August 15, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. fc'*': :X mLL (' Street Location of Legal Description i (Vmer: t/frptL±^ ^ (Nam Type of Request: i Description of Req , /5 ITp Please draw or att 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Indicate Nor Location on Adjacent Sti Location of existing t Distances be and struct Map or plat showir or the property al Abstractors or ^ Uie land within as those names P^titifm ihoirinr i Village Teconmendj i . ‘ r I of his each of y to the this new through rty, there required s court /ou /V- 7~y-77 ■A Case No. CITY OF OtoNO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application Fee Date Street Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: OfTDer: ^ t« ' INamej ^CAddressj Uone) Type of Request:Rezoning Variance JL Conditional Use Peimit Subdivision Approval Trr EMe/ft other 1. Indicate North 2. Location on Lot 3. Mjacent Street Names 4, Location of setback and use of adjacent existing building. 5. Distances between any proposed structures and structures on adjacent property. 6. Dimensions of proposed structure 7. Proposed setbacks 8. Zoning in force in this area Exhibit Submitted: Map or plat showing the property affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boundaries or the property affected by proposed change. Abstractors or the land within as those names eys certification listing the names and address of the owners of "\of the boundaries of the property requesting ^e change or rezoning on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. hminj; EOt nf prnpftrty rrr-r* _ «^Tr"^n3nr5r3DBC® • Villaoe reconinendations:) ------------------------------------------------ - - ■ -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ t '4. p NOTICE IS I Minnesota, will 15, 1977, at 7:: Strong for prop All persons wis City of Orono By: Order of t Henry F. Miihid Zoning Adminisl /Dated/ July \ TO BE PUBLISHEl i ym I. V0 CITY OF ORDNO, MINNESOTA “lis'.s g*,4fjs ‘ns.5«^ *. (see attached) All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this tune City of Orono . . By: Order of the Planning Conmission Henry F. Muhich Zoning Administrator /Dated/ July 22, 1977 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE LAKE MINNETONKA SUN ON JULY 27 and AUQJST 3, 1977 BPS* Orono, August .ucian follows : HC5»* parcel a ian, which lies easterly, southeasterly and southerly of a line es Tiv'sr ‘5S follows: I "Son FT I A’^'i Beginning at a point e^teHy^^ rrlm corner of said Sou’th Half of of the Southeast Quarter; thence northerly, a f ’ along a line passing through a point on the north l.ne of Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast ^ 670 54 feet easterly from the northwest comer of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast wuer.e^, Hi«^t-nce rieflecttno to the right 55 degrees 02 minutes 3o seconds, a disU^ce of 293 04 feet- thence easterly, deflecting to the right 44 degrees 34 minutes 15 seconds, a distance of 411.6 feet, more or le^, me east line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and said line there terminating NAME 44. lru^^lV^S TT \ p n lAr M\i. U l.iKn. I . VAJftLDt \i\Dn.\vU^ Said above described property is subject to an easement for public right-^f way purposes in Pox Street. FfiMtl C. V\bCU' i.inA I ixJLi nP] iplif ifiUUiLMDCM PilTKXtMV T). Me PARCEL B irSe^l-l.^'Town^^pTlT °Nor“m, STf me^^m^rrct^l^Merld- tan described as follows: ■•4 Commencing at a point on the fe^/e“^terly'^f .est Quarter pf the Souiheast^Qua^^^^^^^^ d.si^^t 7,5^5^fe the southwest northerly, a distance of 363.06 feet, along a Southeast Quarter; thence ,, , gajd South Half of the line passing through a point on e distant 670.74 feet easterty Northwest Quarter of the ^outheas ' Northwest Quarter from the northwest comer „ ”3'„f the land to be of the Southeast Quarter, ® ^ fipcttno to the right 55 degrees 02 described; of 293.04 feet; thence easterly, deflect- minutes 35 seconds, «. e i •=; <ipconds a distance of 411.6 Ing to the right 44 degrees ^ South* Half of the Northwest feet, more or f^J^'^l^Xence norm along said east line Quarter of the ° ‘ s’^om Half of the Normwest Quarter of to the northeast comer of sal ^lonn the north line of said me soumeast of the Southeast Quarter, to a soum Half of the 74 f^gt easterly from the normwest romU°V-aTor Half Quarter^f the Southeast QuTrter; thence soumeasterly to the point of beginning. . V Southeaist Quarter I Principal Merid- le described as of the North- jet easterly thwest Quarter r 363.08 feet, said South disteunt South Half of northeasterly, a distance 4 degrees or less, to :r of the r public right—of- east Quarter ctpal Merld- the North— ;terly from tor of the , along a ilf of the et easterly : Quarter to be rees 02 deflect- : of 411.6 Northwest d east line uarter of said , to a northwest theast 13 I P‘ > I 1 ^ i\ .4 If: ...........II*'- 4 i hcsb«DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST "Son FT I \ DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS LOT BLK.PARCEL i - W"1 - /Z"<c2Q! --------------------\ ^ - --------*— ---------------------—------- 0800 *\nUK • A 1 0 n N\r hAV\ L/\K1 zr^ur^e-^ATriftt) A/AJ47!|OOQ_ •’t * 1. IKA 1 VxJ KJ 18ZS_ ix/jor'wliiv ^ TQ^OK.C-, i i8c;o_ i y/\ *-1^ Y-J 1 iSi ipr\KiK r* W\i\T kAM 1 ^ c/e> ^ £az.l Ase ^^£=^5 \^P.i>.jSoK. 9S^o .4? 7AOO V--- IvtOl^—l!LLlAJ-r LaJ iv\ i ^ xXJI^y tJKlJPsJ T'. 1 l/M \k ) lA NA/NT KAU 1 is, CO ^:V7oo 1 S \ \ % IVwJL 4 iV\fk LfA PiTFlOANV tl MjiMiL ^^£>eCe> "Z/trr£^A>^- FVJ ATTa/: A/AJATf i9'ryi>AJ :LnPC. ^ _ ^ / 7*/^, id S 7T '//Af HA{> ' JL*JL3»JL_l_—1_____________—-------------------—I 1______•i 1------------------------- 1 ! ^-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ■■ i- • 1 certify that the facts representea on this certificate are an accurate and true representation of Informa* ___l|nn as It appears this date on the 1^)------- — --------------—-------------------------------- "—■! [■gcords of the Henn. Co* Finance Div.p to the best of my knowledge and belief. Henn. Co. Finance Division 4 Date"I “4-mBv W : r t- 4 •.r sis.': 2SS-' Page yj COUNCIL ^CETING Zcfiing Adniinistratt Presented photos ai the front of garag< Councilinvestigation - na planning OCWflSSIC Discussed revis^j to street hazardoi Suggested applioa of 25 *. Applican proposal is si®ini staff - July 28, Contractor for ti a revised propos ¥..m ■■■i'f- ^90 LOT BLK.PARCEL r>eoQ_i iSSa T^DQ. ^o?_S A? no C-,(z2^ I 1 ■ ■/ ■ 1 t fcrJ A c Qi*#^ftrt - 140 Leaf Street L- ■■%■■ tr - —I k. ^ hrh^t r ' n Tefened proposal back to P«_Co™nissi«^ for fart • I tit t A tint* tided invesriga*-*''”--------- planning ocuassicw meeting - July «. p^sed to street hatardo _______ i^^asing street settop 5“.'?i"^ed TAsoJSsei revi^ setback. pifoposal is sil)iniLted. STAFF - July 28, 1977STAIT - July 28, 1977 3^*^t lor”^'L^ ““977. seeting. ! .; . '. 'i Iv'- V- ■' ■ ■ ' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: I /.•Enclosed Sheldon J easements approval. This mat' ! A. ______ standpoint . Riscoiirocndcd and site «s. Egress y ndnintan ntil revised Bady to submit 13 >4 ( i yr ,'V' ■i i...- ‘k TO: FROM: D/OE: SUBJECT Planning Comnission § Council Hank Muhich, Zoning Administr #2 July 25, 1977 » r„rr«Tatlon - 1200 Old Crystal Bay Road a.,. «« «:ss?SH53SSiHszr- approval . letter vm be before the Comcil at their meeting of August 8. 1977. V >• •i • 1 r. . ! ;•=.• t il.l THOMAS VCNNUM LCONARD C. LINDQU NORMAN L.NCWHALI UAURCSS V. ACKMAN OCRALD C. MAONU8C COWARD M.OLCNNOI MCLVIN I. ORCNSTCII CUOCNC M. KCATING JAMCS R. MARTINCAl RICHARD J. RITZOCR^ PHILIP J.ORTHUN SALISBURY ADAMS MACLAY R. HYOC COWARD J. PARKCR JOHN A.rORRCST WILLIAM C. FOX JCRROLO F. BCRCFAI WILLIAM T. DOLAN WILLIAM C. MORTCNS LCW SCHWARTZ JOHN H. STROTHMAN DAVID O. NCWHALL OCNNIS H.MATHISCN KURTIS A. GRCCNLCY Mr. Bui A Oro 133 Oro: Gent We 1 cert to t made sect Jaco top'o alre We h divi of J- that with Spec; by tl ) f resents the ion 1977. •r m 11 i. I .♦■• < >y.■■.. . THOMAS VCNNUM LCONAftO C. LINDQUIST NORMAN L.NCWHALL LAURC88 V. ACKMAN OCRALD C. MA0NU8ON COWARD M.OLCNNON MCLVIN I.ORCNSTCIN CUOCNC H. KCATINO JAMCS R. MARTINCAU RICHARD J. RIT20CRAL0 PHILIP J.ORTHUN SALISBURY ADAMS MACLAV R. HYDE COWARD J. PARKER JOHN A.rORRCST WILLIAM C. rOX JCRROLO r. BCRGFALK WILLIAM T. DOLAN WILLIAM C. MORTCNSCN LEW SCHWARTZ JOHN H. 8TROTHMAN DAVID O. NCWHALL DENNIS M.MATHISCN KURTIS A. ORCCNLCY ROBERT V. ATMORE DAVID C. KRAUSE JOHN 8.WINSTON DANIEL T. LINDSAY LAURANCC R.WALDOCH THOMAS H. GARRETT 1|| harry c . piper lU daryle l. uPHor r WAYNE A. SIVERTSON DAVID J. DAVENPORT MARK R. JOHNSON RONALD L. ROLLINS RICHARD A. PRIMUTH JEFFREY R. SCHMIDT KRISTINE J. STROM timothy H. BUTLER ROBERT G. MITCHELL, JR, STEVEN r. OMAN J. MICHAEL DADY BEVAN B.ALVEY J. KEVIN COSTLEY NADINE STROSSEN JOHN C.GOETZ ROBERT J. HARTMAN LINDQUIST & VENNUM ♦200 IDS CENTER • SO SOUTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE (612) 335-6651 CABLE AOORES5: LINL WAY2ATA OFFICE WAYZATA MEDICAL BUILDING 2BO NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55301 JUL 20 1977 VILLAGE OF ORONO July 19, 1977 Mr. Henry Muhich Building and Zoning Administrator Orono City Hall 1335 Brown Road South Orono, Minnesota Mr. Bruce D. Malkerson Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman & Doty 4344 IDS Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re;2640 North Shore Drive; 1200 Old Crystal Bay Road; Sheldon Jacobs, Three Fifteen East Grant Corp. Gentlemen: We represent Mr. Sheldon Jacobs who has agreed to purchase certain property from Three Fifteen East Grant Corr Pursuant purchase agreement. Three Fifteen East cLnt Corp h2s subdivide the land owned by it at tL'intL section of County Road No. 84 and County Road L 5? Mr Jacobs IS purchasing that portion of TrL^A, shown on already^owLrbrhim?^® d!v?sIon’'®I^rwe hat®*'®" "°^\>^®l^ting to the proposed sub- "1. 20* wide easement on eastern edge of property. "2. Conservation flow easement elevation 932.00." •: •* . '■= *' ’ 1mm ■* t Jm ■'X ■ LINDQUIST r' y-Ci Messrs July 3 page We ha’ relati easem' can a owned reaso Counc Secor the C that roars! a coi quesi the < what< Fina ease prop comp cons As V bel: dis£ app- the met] sta: we Cit be the cor JB V E N N U M S’::* STREET 2 )L 20 1977 5E OF ORONO n ich. 2 i Drive; icobs, irchase Pursuant Corp ., has it the inter . Mr. on the s not posed sub- on minutes It appears greement City, imposed cty. LINDQUIST VE N N U M ■‘•'5 tv 0M- Messrs. Muhich and Malkerson July 19 f 1977 Page Two .• the additional requirements rirrcquirnidftiori\"^^^^ iralonallen^^s Tf^^he^two^equirements added by the Crty Council . secondly , we do not understand «hyg ’^^|erinfo™S*'by^to!^Muhic^ ^ulsfion of notice fave'crstructive notice of rat°evti"rnrciplfo?^Lrnces are applicable. _ A- Pinally. we are troubled by apP^ easements in <3"®stion. The City PP „ithout P^T^^fproperty without^due^process^of_^l question the cSns?itution;iity of the requirements. irie discussed with Mr «f'“in^eAtlSns o^gollfarf ^®«tmilar on the contrary, eserve the beauty of trea! "Se ^spel^uu/^ method proposed by the City P^^r city ordinances, stances, especially m view o • ^ O T* T\ S X! stancfcis^ # ^ vVip „e would like to voice these possible for us to City Council, and understan | consider our request, an be on the August 8 agenda. Please^oo then let “S, hnow whether^a v-ur assistance. considered by the Council Sincerely, LINDQUIST & VENNUM JEW:lit cc Sheldon Jacobs J ame s G. Rob i n .w . \\: ■•■-.V/'h:K- TSI^ m \ ssrssss IN SAINT PAUL: riNST nationai . bank building FI(NE APPAREL FOR MEN I July i:\ 1077 The Oro.'.o Villr.-e Council Lex LC Crystal *-ay, 'linnesotn 5532J Attn: '..•niter A. Lensen I, Jolm i.n..u:ierel, voulC li?.c to ho considered Tor the \acanc:r on tne Orono Flanninc Coi.u.iission. I have heeii f twenty five year.s and, of course, f^el It IS a most ecli-htful area in v:hich to live. Over tlie years, both t’ne I lanninr, hoard and the Council have uo::e a superb job of naintainir.:: fne rural aspect of tuxs coT.,.iu:;ity t'.ius oafe^tinin.'i::-; the life stvle '.aacn all of us enjoy so inucli. 2 feel stror.-ly'about protectinc the lal.c area fron^. a conservntio:rstandnoint os n-ell as the environmental aspect and land use. ‘ ofhf;'1:b I follouc.; the <!e=isio,.s .*e lanuiii'} so~.r.issiou and t;:c Council on land use policies and maintenance . 1 have concurLd cr.i for t!ie i.ost part* For many years, I iiave been in the men's retail clothinc ^usinc.,o. Irescntly, I am style co-ordinator of the •ubert ..liite i.ien's store and active in sales. I tliank Vou foi your consldcr;ition in this r:at\tcr. C. i.ainnorcl bnyside IloaJ ’'aple Plain, Mn. 55359 ^ I n 1 / JUL 21 1S( » I^LLAGB os dbonq mm :;yay,-v;yi^ - r-' •■■■• V i ■■■" ■ . =.v rr’ ■ '■ '■ iv'- 1'i I- 1Ij ;.v! } 1 -V9 !’ !'l r 3 f* ■J fr r7.3 AufrU&T • my § II i"I mr^- s a S 5? E^iWii 111]miiAT rj i iFll' ■ Ii Mil nil•* ?ii •• iUHn> iru M ii' H »S f*J«i|!i!pi:!!| i ■ t,-S>maf.%.-%g/"Sfk /VO. cnsa -aa I! li; '’*'i!!' i r '!|i|i!|!i !ii |i Iji pi ii liipSi I'lli ii i ||l|i 1 • !|» *)'' i ? j: 1 j t iu COUNTY j _ 0OAO ^c7— if 1 ■i t ,iS|i»i \ im ii!PiijiPilil|ii . |hi‘. ih -!r . » i * S V ? 1 * J • r-t i ' ■'i' 'liiiiiilHiiUi ! I • ii ii |i !■' t li K L iir 5 i ^ IP p i t! I-r c * 5 /* 2 P - ) ■■:r:,rf] I , \ r" I jtai 5j 5 ^ § Cfc >? < o/ S to/ >» h «y' 6#’<i > W<.o^ W1».^ Sfl- Q 50 0>s =♦1:tc CD O 5 •'..fP '.>:4 mmm.wm ■mmmmm feiiPB': •ll^.V’- H * . . :d■:-A om ( inn tfan* 13A «n*cw mu. m n *v»i wt t*m w.u* •, •’. ^*/‘**^J* «MiJ!rL •« fm ^tttmmt «•»•►* -< —t4 »«♦*• *•**•*•'• '"L. » <— -•* • “- «- ‘-'- *’••WKM«t W«»i. "» • *•«•' "> “•' *"'** ''•• ''•••~* I**' *- *•” z ^u.;. n'‘. .rr-. nu.».—• — —• •>»- "** ^ LT j___________ ^%mt. %*m*^\*. ** IW r1#l •! •««■»•• mraft, • •* •»*.•* »••«, ■«•••, «- **^ ;ir»u^r. -.- •'— —•;'• * •r.rirv"‘' *'"------- - r wet' It- • •*••— ^ 1-^». te* ^ ..t4 wt- «M< >-rwe. t^*w. Wtt* *«4 •mi itm • M.f*^ ♦» . *• —w -• IMS. W «w ^i*t O'* 9U • ^ ^ _ _ _ ^ t— t— * •»— —<—♦«!•. «• >•'’ •*•';-•* irirtii . *.•<— <* ••■" '•^- —«-—'>•• '- ^ IP —<1—. • 4i*t*ik«» V.;* f#*ti *^ ..:. M ri»M. ■—iw • •«>- >'••'i ITw-.. » B —J». . ««— ^ !»...• fM. • .M m* ' - grHKt^te t aw*t •»' M t a • *•)’ rcnsrrnmrr PHtuiMIW A«y PU4T FOR tti._ry|«.i:u.Ey iwc □sec 3 , r .7, p- 2 3 CIT/ OF OROMO MtKiKJfcPlW COCttjTy MfWWESOTA