Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-22-1993 Council Packet
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 ROLL The Council met on the above dale with the following members present; Mayor Edward Callahan. Councilmembers J. DiannG(X*tten, Charles Kelley, Jof:llen Ilurr and Gabriel Jabbear. The follow'ing represented staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Building & 2ioning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gattron, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, Public Works Director John Gerhardson. City Engineer Glenn Cook and Recorder Lin Vee. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. (♦#1) CONSENT AGENDA Goeiten requested that Items n, #6. and #16 be added to the Consent Agenda. Hurr asked that Item #12 be removed from the Consent Agenda. It wa.s moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten. to approve the Consent Agenda as amended Aves 5, navs 0. (•#2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Minutes of the November 8. 1993 City Council Meeting rs submitted. Ayes 5, nays 0. Mayor Callahan noted there were two letters of ct)mmendation tor the Public W'orks Department; 1. A letter from Dr. and Mrs. Alexander Vongries commending Jim Gregory and Greg Palmer for their work at his property on 4051 Highwood Road. 2. A letter from Mii/i Overland of the Early Childhcxxl Family Education Program thanking Scott Oberaigner and Randy O'Brien for their panicipaiion in the Early ChildhixnJ l amily Education Super Sanirday Vehicle Fair. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS There were representatives present. PUANNINC; CO.M.MISSION COMMENTS - Stephen PcferMin. Representative. f ^re were no Planmng Commission comments PUBLIC COALMENTS Ihere were no public conimeiMi V MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 POLICE CHIEF REI»ORT The Police Chief was not present. ^1842 TOM AND SHEILA BROWNE, 760 SOUTH BROWN ROAD - REQUEST TO MODIFY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten. to approve the amended plans for the current building pennit .'application for Tom and Sheila Browne, 760 South Brown Road. Ayes 5. nays 0. (#4) /!tl860 ZELMA McKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONTLNUATION OF REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Mayor Callahan e.xplained that Council was to consider whether a driveway should be accessed off of Blaine Avenue or Livingston Avenue. He added that all Councilmembers should have received a letter from the neighbors’ attorney expressing the view that the City is not required to grant a conditional use permit. Callahan had asked City Attorney Staunton to review the letter from the L<»mnien Nelsc-n law fimi. City Attorney Staunton reaffirined his opinion that the City must grant a conditional use permit in this case and the City does not have the ability to add an owner occupied status as a condition of the conditional use. Callahan stated there were two concerns remaining: 1. Has the property been used according to the Codc.^ 2. Parking issues.w .Mabusth explained the two parking options: 1, Access from Livingston Avenue with the existing drive to be realigned. Hardcover w ill be an issue in this option w ith the addition of two parking stalls. City Engineer Ctx)k com.iienied on drainage in the area stating it would he hard to calculate (he overall effect of this small additional amount of hardcover. However, anything done in the area will impact the watershed. 2. Creation of a new curb cut off of Blaine Avenue. I he 15* street setback would allow parking at 15'. Backing out onto Blaine Avenue would result. Additional land alterations would be required according to the City Engineer. City Engineer Cook added that a "daylight area" would need to be created to the north and that clear visibility would have to be maintained involving the neighbor to the south lie stated this access could be made safe hue there would be significant impact on the property. MINUTES OF THE REGULiUl ORONO CITY COUNCIL MKETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 m) ns60 ZELMA Mc Kinney , 3599 Livingston avenue - cont . In response to the question of the use of the property in the past, Mabusth advised there were missing receipts from approximately July 1967 - January 1969. Gayle Siegler explained that during this time period her father had been undergoing heart surgeries. She felt she could substantiate that the property had always been a rental property. Karen Cuff. 3570 Livingston Avenue, stated that she had calculated the hardcover according to the survey submitted and noted a total of 23.3%. Adding either driveway would exceed the 30% allowed. She also stated that she had obtained information on the Uniform Building Code and Fire Codes in effect at the time of construction and noted that if a home was built as a duplex, a sound barrier between levels would have been required as well as smoke detectors (fire alarms), some lighting requirements, interior door specificatioiLS, etc. She asked that Council consider the impact the excess hardcover would have in the area. Greg Goodfellow, 3585 Livingston Avenue, noted that runoff is a problem in this neighborhood and it does not have to be a 100-year rain. He also commented that in 1978 the McKinney’s applied for a building permit which added additional bulk to the building. The statute stated that there was to be no increase or bulk added to the building as of January 1, 1975. However, the City allowed this to happen. He expressed his wish that the Council consider the letter received from their attornev. Goixlfcllow also noted that in January’ of 1983, Pat Molene who rented the third apartment at 3585 Livingston Avenue, filed a complaint with the City of Orono asking why this property could be used as triplex. The Code states a non-conforming use cannot be changed to another non-conforming use. Goodfellow felt a triplex would be considerably different than a duplex. Callahan noted that this application was for a duplex not a triplex. Mabusth confirmed that the application was for the continuation of a non-conforming use, in ;his case a duplex. Jabbour asked if a reduction in density would constitute abandonment of the conditional use. City Attorney Staunton replied that if there had been three units, moving to two units would not be considered abandonment. Jabbour thtmght the Council should consider if there was an intent for the property to be used as a duplex throughout its history. Kelley did not want to vote on this issue until there was proof of the use of the property during the missing 18 months of receipts. Hurr asked if a conditional use permit was conditioned upon the owner staying there, would it lapse upon the owner’s depanurc.^ 1 MINLTI’ES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITV COUNCTI. MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 (#4) /i'1860 ZELMA McKINNEY. 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONT. City Attorney Staunton responded that in this conditional use permit, the duplex use would remain regardless of ownership. He noted that the use must remain the same as that prior to the change in Zoning Code. If the Council determines the use has been continuous, the conditional use permit is a mechanism for registering with the City the duplex use of this property. Hurr asked if there was any time frame for a property to be brought into compliance with City codes. City Attorney Staunton confirmed there was nothing in the code. The only way Uie conditional use permit would lapse is if there was a significant change such as the building being destroyed, the use abandoned or significant change in the non-conforming nature ot the use. Mabusth added that now' the application for a building permit for multiple units in a single family zoning district would trigger the application for a conditional use permit. Hurr asked if this were being assessed as two units. Mabusth noted the applicant was receiving a percentage of the homestead credit because of the rental unit. Siegler thought Hennepin County was listing the property as a multiple use but Orono lists as single family. Jabbour noted the idea of willful abandonment should be considered. Mike Swan-son. 3596 Lyric Avenue, stated that if the driveway were constructed off of Blaine in back of his property, it would impact his property and cause a problem when he puts up a garage. He has concern over the sale of the property if Mrs. McKinney no longer lives there. An absentee owner could be much different. F-lizabeth Goodfellow'. 3585 Livingston Avenue, stated there were several issues that were unclarified. 1. Can the City lawfully issue a conditional use permit? 2. Parking - The City’s ordinances require additional parking in order for this property to be used as a duplex. She telt there was not a reasonable answer to the parking problem, therefore the conditional use permit should not be granted. None of the neighbors want the parking expanded. She asked how the Council could justify granting a comlitional use permit when the parking needs were not satisfied. Harvey Reder, 3598 Livingston Avenue, asked if the Council would consider three parking spaces instead of four as he had suggested at a previous meeting. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 (;^4) /^1860 ZELMA McKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONT. Ilurr asked for clarification of the parking requirement. Mabusth stated the garage stalls could be counted as well as other designated parking spaces. Mabusth noted this property is not \sithin 1000’ of the shoreline, and if it were it would be allowed Z57c hardcover, so hardcover is not an issue. Lot coverage could be an issue but there is not any structure being added. Goetten asked about triggers that may have been in place tor a conditional use permit in 1968. Mabusth confirmed there is more zoning review done today than in the past. Kelley asked if Goetten thought the interruption in rental in the late 1960’s may not have an effect because the code changed in 1975. City Attorney Staunton explained that since the property was used as a duplex before the zoning code made it non-conforming, it could continue as duplex use. Mabusth add-rd the code ciianged in 1962 so the use would have had to have been in exi.stence in 1962 and continued through to present. City Attorney Staunton continued that according to the code in 1978. expansion of the bulk of the building would not have been allowed if a conditional use permit was in place. Tlie City should probably not have allowed this expansion, but it did. I'his still does not affect the use of the property. Citv Attorney Staunton explained the concepts of abandonment and discontinuance. Abandonment requires the intent to no longer use the property in the designated way as well as the discontinuance of the use. Tlie Code talks about discontinuance for over 12 monOis. There is a presumption that if there is a discontinuance for longer than 12 months, there is intent to abandon the use unless there is evidence of no intent to abandon. If they w'ere unable to rent the property for a time, that wxiuld not constitute abandonment. Ilurr asked about the utilities. .Mabusth confirmed they have two gas meters and one water meter. Sewer was installed in the early 1960’s. Hurr questioned if there should be two sewer assessments. Mabusth replied that staff has recommended that Council liKik at requiring the payment ot another SAC and sev*'cr assessment. Hurr questioned if the non-confonning use changed from two to three to two rental units if this wouldn’t iiklicatc a change of use. City Attorney Staunton confirmed the two-family use would not have changed even though there may have been an increa.se. Hie change wxiuld have to be to another use such as retail to qualify as a whange in use. Hurr questioned if the code was clear vm whether a change in density would constitute a change in use. Staunton responded that the code only states a "ch.mge in use". 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 (#4) #1860 ZELMA McKINNEY, 3599 LFVLNCSTON AVENUE - CONT. Ilurr agreed with Kelley that further documentation would be needed to prove continued duplex use before she could make a decision. Mayor Callalian noted that since most of the receipts exist, it is assumed the missing receipts also exist. He felt it questionable that there was a willful abandonment. Jabbour asked the City Attorney what liability the City has in issuing the building permit in 1978. Staunton thought it would be difficult to make the owners rebuild the house as it was in 1978. Mayor Callahan asked if the building curiently meets the fire codes for a duplex. Mabusth responded that there is no housing code in Orono for rental properties. The Building Inspector did make an inspection of the property and there are some recommendations for corrections of recent improvements. Jabbour felt it obvious the property has been used as a duplex and it would be the City ’s job to prove the owners willingly abandoned the duplex use. He added that he sees the City ’s only choice to grant the conditional use permit based on the recent discussions. He also did not think parking should impact the neighbors and would be agreeable to ihree parking spaces. Hurr asked about a previous nitino that brought up concerns about the regulation of storage of boats, etc. on the property and if there could be conditions to regulate this in the conditional use pemiit. Staunton explained that regulations on the storage of boats, etc. would be pursuant to the code regardless of whe-her there is a conditional use permit granted. He stated that this property cannot be treated any differently than any other in the same zoning district because of the cond' ional use permit. Hurr felt that additional conditions could be put on a property if it has a conditional use permit. Jabbour suggested that if a parking variance were granted, additional conditions could be added to the variance regarding boat storage, etc. This would help to control the water runoff and hardcover in the area. A motion was made by Jabbtmr. seconded by GcK*t;en, to grant a cortditional use permit for duplex use and a variance to the requirement for four parking stalls because of the City ’s intention tt) reduce water runoff in this part of the City. A condition of the variance resolution will he that no additional exterior parking, i.e. RVs. boats, campers, tractors, trailers, snowmobiles, etc., will be allowed on the propeny. Ayes 4, nays 1. Hurr opposcc the motion. Hurr asked that tlic resolution iiK'ludc the payment of SAC and sewer assessment MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 (*#5) /S^1882 JOHN M. O’SULLIVAN/O’SULLIVANS, 2420 SHADYWOOI) ROAD AMENDED COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN - RESOLUTION NO. 3359 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goettcn, to grant approval of the revised commercial site plan fire lane requirements per conditions of Resolution No. 3359 tor John O’Sullivan, 2420 Shady wood Road ^yes 5, nays 0. (*#6) ;5^I886 ROBERT L. MELAMED. 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 3360 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to grant a conditional use permit to allow the filling of approximately 1,800 cubic yards at 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road Soutli for Ro'oert L. Melamed per Resolution No. 3360. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*tn) /I'1887 ROBERT L. MELAMED, 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY' ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 3361 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to grant a conditional use permit to permit a gue.st house at 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road South for Robert L. Melamed per Resolution No. 3361. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#8) PAUL AND VeNITA SCHNEBELE, 835 FOREST AR.MS LANE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3362 Mabusth explained the ap 'licants are seeking approval of an average lakeshore setback variance for a family room addition The applicants have advised that they are in the process of making landscape improvements involving the removal of plastic underliners. The excesses of hardcover within the 250-500’ setback area will be removed. Overall hardcover is at 15%. Jabbour suggested that the density that is added in the 250-500’ setback area be subtracted from the 75-250’ zone an<l included in the resolution. Mabusth noted that w ith the removal of plastic in the 250-5(X)’ setback area, this brings hardcover down to 24% where they would be allowed 30%. In this case, it is not appropriate to include in the resolution but Jabbour felt for the future there should be a policy that if hardcover is over in one area, it should be subtracted in another so the total will never exceed the maximum hardcover allowed. Goetten asked to have hardcover in the 0-75’ setback area noted in the resolution for permanent record. It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Kelley, to approve Resolution No. 3362 granting a variance to permit the construction of an addition to the west and lakeside of the existing residence to be placed 20’ in front of the average lakcshorc setback line for Paul and \’eNita Schnebele. 835 Forest Arms Lane. Ayes 5, nays 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOV EMBER 22, 1993 (Hf9) FRONT/BACK LOT REQUIREMENTS - ORDINANCE Galfron fell some additic.:al changes would make the ordinance more user friendly. Mayor Callahan suggested that Gaffron check with the Pl-.nning Commission Chair to sec if he thought the changes suggested were significant enough to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. If not, bring back to Council for approval in the revised form. A imiiion was made by Ilurr, seconded by Jabbour, to table adoption of the ordinance amending the Municipal Zoning Code and Subdivision Code by defining standards for the creation and use of lots which do not abut a public or private road. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAVOR/COUNCIL REPORT 1) Hurr asked to discuss the memo regarding Police Lieutenant Salary Negotiations. She was opposed to the merit pay concept because no other employees are involved with this and does not want the City Administrator to proceed as proposed. City Administrator Moorse commented that currently the lieutenants have a 5% merit pay amount that is not based on performance. Moorse is suggesting making this performance based. Some Council members felt merit pay should then be done for all employees. Moorse iliought they could move in this direcf.on, but not all at one time. Mayor Callahan thought the City Administrator should negotiate the contract with the lieutenants and the Council could then eithei give other employees an equal share or reject the contract. Hurr slated she was giving dirccticn as to what she considered acceptable. 2) Hurr asked about travel expenses related to the Finance Director picking up materials from LOGIS, the City ’s data processing vendor. City Administrator Moorse explained this is cheaper than using another ser\ ice or having another employee drive to Logis for pick-ups. Jabbour suggested Mtx)rsc check with some delivery services to get cost comparisons. An educated comparison can then be made. Goetten agreed. 3) Kelley reported that he met with the Long Lake Fire Commission and spoke about the relief a-sstK-iation as well as some other matters and fell all was going well. The Fire Commission did ask if they arc getting the 2% commission from the State after the district lines were redrawn in the Fox Street area The cities will get further irdormation on this. O MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Jabbour expressed his appreciation to the Planning Commission for their professional handling of the zoning applications. Jabbour also reported that payment for the new facilities is almost complete and project costs have come within $1,000 of the budget. One cold storage building was eliminated to stay within the budget. Goetten expressed her concern icr the sun problem in the administrative office and inquired about the status of the order for shades. Moorse explained that the original order was lost by the vendor during a move to a new office location. The blinds were reordered appro.ximately six w'eeks ago and should be in fairly soon. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#10) TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES - RESOLUTION NO. 3363 Huit asked about the access over Highview Road and if it was a fully improved road access. Mabusth explained access was via a small alleyway that is undeveloped. She added it wall not be an easy property to develop but is very beautiful. A motion was made by Hurr. seconded by Goetten, to appro^'e the sale of the tax forfeit property and retention by the City of the other piece. Kelley asked if the City liad "first rights" to the property if they wanted to buy it. Jabbour noted the City would have to have a purpose for it The County contacts the City in case the City would condemn it for road development, sever, etc. Gerhardson confirmed the property could be retained for park purposes. Kelley tnought the City should consider keeping property rather than "giving it away". Gerhardson stated a buildable property such as thb is usually sold. Mabusth explained that there were 10 potential buildable lots on this larger piece of property. Kelley asked again why the City did not attempt to purchase this piece if they can get It for the market value of $41,500. Councilmembers agreed that further information should be obtained about the pt)ssibility of acquiring this land. Hurr wiilidrew her previous motion Kelley made a motion, Goetten seconded, to table consideration of the tax forfeited land. P.I.D 07-117-23 23 0001. until further review can be done. Ayes 5, nays 0. 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 (/!»10) TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES - RESOLUTION NO. 3363 - CONT Ilurr noted there is a 90 day time limit with approximately 60 days left to respotid to the County. A motion was made by Jabbour, seconded by Goeiten. to approve Resolution No. 3363 requesting conveyance of tax forfeit lands. P. I. D. 36-118-23 11 0002, for the purpose of public road and utility. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*//ll) DAVID NELSON, CSO, RESIGNATION It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to accept the resignation ot David Nelson, effective November 9. 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. (1^12) delinquent utility accounts - RESOLUTION NO. 3364 Ilurr inquires ’»v.v s.">me of these delinquents have gotten over $1,000 if they are done each year. City Administrat(^r Moorse responded he would check into this further. A motion was made by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour. to adopt Resolution No. 3364 providing for the collection of delinquent charges for 1993 sewer and water utility services and annual septic inspectit>n and recycling program fees. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•#13) LEVY SEWER CONNECTION FEE - RESOLUTION NO. 3365 It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Goetten, to adt)pt Resolution .No. 3365, A Resolution to Approve Connection to Municipal Sewer of the Propeny l>ocated at 1940 Shoreline Drive. Ayes 5, nays 0. r#14) RESOLUTION TO CALL 1980 BONDS RESOLUTION NO. 3366 Mayor Callahan asked if the City were going to refinance the 1989 bonds if it would be cheaper to do it all at one time. City Administrator Moorse explained these bonds will not be refinanced but paid off. A motion was made by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten. to adopt Resolution No. 3366 calling tor tlie redemption of the general obligation bomis of 1980. Ayes 5, nays 0. J r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETLNG HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD Hurr asked it these charges were typical and if the City went out for bids. City Administrator Moorse replied that bids were obtained when this agent was hired and bids will be done again during the next year. He felt this agreement was comparable to other cities and probably lower than other cities similar to Orono. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, t.y appoint Mr. Duweyn Carlson, Apple /alley Agency, as Insurance Agent of Record for 1994, at a fee not to exceed $7,650.00, including commissions earned on policy premiums paid by the City. Ayes 5, nays 0. (*#16) APPOINTMENT OF AUDIT FIRM Hurr noted that it costs the City $2,000+ a year to obtain the financial award. City Administrator Moorse explained that when the City first started the process to get this award, there was a lot of work to do but now it is maintenance. Hurr thought the award may not be f ecessar)' every year since there is a cost of $2,250 annually for the certificate program. Gtietten explained that she worked hard at getting this program in place because she felt this was a way lor Orono to show financial stability. City Administrator Moorse stated that part of the program is to follow good fii^ial procedures and this meets standards set by the State and National Organization of FinarKial Officers. Moorse explained that the costs related to the award are not a payment for the award, but rather arc for assistance in keeping up with new accounting standards related to both gtKxl financial practices and the receipt of the award. Hurr asked if the City could meet those standards without paying the cost.s each year. Kelley thought the standards would change yearly and would be good to keep up with them as they arc updated. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Gvietten. to appoint the audit firm of Malloy, Kamowski, Kadosevich & Co. to perform the required audits lor the 1993 fiscal year at an estimated cost of $15,700 plus direct expenses and lo assist with the Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reponing program at a cost not to exceed $1,500. Ayes 5, nay s 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 {HI) INFORMATION ON MEDIATION .MEETING (ORAL REPORT) City Administrator Moorse reported that the Highway l2 Mediation Meeting identified the characteristics of a good solution including; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Survivai of the two communities in their current status. Responding to the sat • concerns of the current highway. Whatever is built shoulo • e an economically sound investment. Compatibility with regie..al transportation system. Environmentally sensitive. Solution should expedite a decision on the location. Survival of Maple Plain. Traffic capacity needs were discussed and whether other roadways could be considered to help with the traffic flow. I'unher snidy needs to be done in this area. Some action steps discussed were: 1. To re-examine the traffic projections. 2 'Po consider the extent to which other roads can be used. 3. To consider segregating types of traffic on specific roadways. Some suggestions were made lor focusing on the issues. If tlic twi cities and MnDoi agree on the type and location of a road that would be acceptable, then study could continue for capacity, safety, and environmental nt^Js. Another suggestion is to look at the characteristics of a good solution and try to agree on a solution before proceeding with tbu analysis of the tratlic needs Mayoc Callahan agreed with the points discussed. He was the only other Orono representative prekmt at the meeting. He did not think having 5 representatives was necessary or useful but only 1 representative may not be enough. Jabbv)ur wants to be sure that only one representative at the meeting would not be interpreted as non-interest. He suggested a mumal agreement with Umg Lake as to the number of representatives that would be appropriate at each meeting. Other Councilmembcrs agreed w.th this suggestion. Goetten and Kelley had both talked with Long I^e representatives who also agree with this approach. Mayor Callalian stated there was also a recent Highway 12 Policy Comminee meeting. TIk economists that have been considered to do the Economic Impact Study had second thoughts ut the study being useful to Orono. They agreed they would re lo the irattic projections and look at them in a "scrcenline prtx:ess" which means they would liK)k at traffic levels at several "b»)undar> " Icvauons between Willmar and MinneapsMis. 12 MINin'KS OF THK RKOIJLAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 (•#18) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten. to approve the following licenses: Residential Kennel Licenses: Wayne E. & Gayle D. Carrier. 1370 North Arm Drive Home Occupation License: Balance Consulting Group, 2597 Lydiard Circle Septic System Installer License: Duane Ritter Exc.. 7120 Vernon Street, Rockford Off Sale Liquor: Navarre Liquors. 3421 Shoreline Drive On Sale Liquor: Jimmies Lounge. 3380 Shoreline Drive Club Liquor: Woodhill Country' Club, 200 W\xKlhiIl Road Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard Non-Intoxicating Liquor Off Sale: Orono Shopping Center, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard O’Sullivan's, 2420 Shadywoixl Road Non-Intoxicating Liquor On Sale: Orono Golf Course. 265 Orono Orchard Road South Ayes 5, nays 0. (♦#19) BU.LS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten. to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Public Works Director John Gerhardson had two additional items to discuss: 1. Costs of undergrouiKl Uink removal. The original amrsunt ot S1950 was witiKJUt any contammated soils. Since there was some contamination, the amount has increased to $3506 because of additional testing and lab work The amount of actual tank disposal remains at $18(X). I unher testing because of contamination is csumaicd at $7195. r MINirrES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 DISCUSSION BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR - COM . 2. Hennepin County is administering the Stubbs Bay Block Grant Program. The connection bids have been much higher than anticipated. The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may have additional monies available to Orono residents. The County would like to submit an application for additional funds on behalf of the City by December 6, 1993. These funds are very similar to the conditions of the Block Grant Program. A motion was made by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, for concepmal approval to proceed with the application for Minnesota Housing Finance Agency monies by December 6, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to adjourn at 9:23 p.m. Ayes 5. nays 0. F^ard J. CallahM, Jr. Mayor A-^FST: /DoSthy M.j^^in, City Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION COUNCIL PUBLIC ATTENDANC ’S MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 5. 14. 15. 2^ ('!) V 7 L •'-i (V 'f : 1 li !U ..tU , d'<^,fC ‘W'Z? ' V •y/.ii j">*V ^ Qiu i. ^ F* f Oc < ^ H f Do.^L*Vtn V V > --------U ")----------------------- ( vU- } ^ V_\vv» • \V) ixbi) \ arrMDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 1993, 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (♦) Asc^^'sic items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by nne motion^bv the City Council under the Consent I^em* cn the agenda. .Memos Secardi^'cr *each of the Aaenda items are available in the Public Packet whicn mav be obtained upon revest from the Recorder. ROLL CALL * 1. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of November 8, 1993 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS planning COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) POLICE CHIEF REPORT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ** applicants ** 3 4 6 7 Immediately after the Council has reviewea your aoDlication please sign the tnree (3) orig-.*a^ resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants neea not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials ttlS42 Tom Browne, 760 Brown Road Souch - Variance - Request to S6S^e"™=K?nnly\°TBf9 l^Anqscon Avenue - Conditional Use . s. #l^fjohn M, O'Sullivan/0-Sullivans, 2420 Shadywood Road - Amended Commercial Site Plan - Resolution rav Road South -#1886 Robert L. Melamed, 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road soutn Conditional Use Permit - Resolutic^ rav Road South - #1887 Robert L. Melamed, 1000 Old Crystal Bay Conditional Use Permit - Resolution a—a Lane - Variance - 8. #1888 Paul i VeNita Schnebeie, 335 rorest A^...s Lane Resolution 9. Front/Back Lot Requirements - Ordinance MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT city ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 10. Tax Forfeit Properties - Resolutions *11. David Nelson, CSO, Resignation *12. Delinquent Utility Accounts - •13. Levy Sewer Connection Fee - Resolution *14. Resolution to Call 1980 Bonds 15. Insurance Agent of Record 16. Appointment of Audit Firm t-*cort) 17. Information on Mediation Meeting (oral P •LICENSES (18) •BILLS (19) ADJOURNMENT ORONO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 8, 1993 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL % The Council met on November 8. 1993 at 7:30 p.m, in the Orono Couficirjphi»/?ibers>%80 Kelley Parkway, Orono, Minnesota. Mayor Edward Callahan, Councilmcrr.bers J. Oi^^Go^n. il^JJCharles Kelley were present. Councilmembers Hurr and Jabbour were excused. Xtjjl^r^ent were City .Administrator Ron Moorse. Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth. .^j^tant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron. City Attorney Kevin Staunton. Public Works Director John Gerhardson, City Engineer Glenn Cwk and Recorder Barbara .Anderson. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. * 1. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Kelley requested that Items #7. #8, #9, #11 and #15 be added to the consent agenda. Councilmember Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, to approve the Consent .Agenda as amended. Ayes 3, Nays 0. Motitm carried. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be included in the minutes in their respective numerical order. Mayor Callahan called attention to the Financial Reporting Achievement Award received by the City and noted that it was quite an accomplishment to have received this award. •2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, for approval of the Minutes of the October 25, 1993 Citv Council Minutes as submitted. All voted in favor. Motion cair ed. 3. CRYSTAl. BAY SITE RECOMMENDATION BY LILI MCMILLAN Lili McMillan gave a report on the discussions held by the Crystal Bay Site Subcommittee and reviewed the issues regarding the future development of the park. She introduced Rand: Carlson, a resident ot Crystal Bay. who was also present. The Subcommittee felt that the option they nreterred was to close the segment of Prospect Avenue between Parcels A and B and combine them mto one large open green space. This option would require the approval of 'he Police and Fire Departments. Randi Carlson staled that there are nua’erous families in the area with children that would use the park, and she believed that they all wt)uld benefit from the park being created. Mayor Callahan comniented that he felt that this area should be utilized as a park: however, it was difficult tc close streets, but he felt that a large green space was the best use ot the property. .Ms. McMillan staled they would pursue this with the appropriate agencies and bring it back before the Council with their recommendations. CITY COCNCIL MINLTKS cm OF ORONO NOVKMBKR 8, 1993 4. FRENCH CREEK PRESERVE BY SUSAN WU^ON Mayor Callahan movpj. Goeitcr. seconded, that the Park Name i!ie portion of the old sewage treatment plant property retained by d^e City as French Creek Preserve. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. 4A. CROSS COUNTRY SKIING AT ORONO GOLF COURSE Councilmember Kelley moved. Goetten seconded, to develop a cross country ski trail at the Orono Golf Course. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. PLANNING COMMISSION CO>LMENTS - Janice Berg, Representative There were no comments from the Planning Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Harvey Reder requested permission to speak regarding Item #6. A1 Ingleman, 350 Old Cry stal Hay Road, stated he was concerned about the City putting a stop sign at the intersection of Highway 15 and County Road 51. Mayor Callahan assured him that the City had no intentii>n of placing a stop sign at that intersection. He noted that the Hennepin County Department of Transportation wiU be back before the Council in the spring with a proposal for a major maintenance project on County Rt>ad 15. 5. CITY OF ORONO, 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOU! IL SUBDIVISION/FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, RESOLUTION mSl. Councilmember Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, tor approval ot tt\ /80 City of Orono, 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road South, Subdivision and Final Approval and adopting Resolution #3351. Ayes 3, Nays 0. Motion carried. 6. #1860 ZEL.MA MCKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVliNUE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mayor Callahan stated that the Council had been advised by the City Attorney that they must gram a Conditional Use Permit to Mrs. McKinney because to allow the continued non-contorming use of the residence as a duplex, because it was used that way prior to the adoption ot the new zoning regulations, and they also cannot require the residence to be owner-occupied. He noted that the City could require the petitioner to supply two additional parking spaces to comply with the zoning requirements that tour stalls be provided for two residential units. Gayle Siegler wits present representing her mother. Zelma McKinney, and she stated that the additional parking spaces required will result in the h>ss ot grass and yard area. r CITY COUNCII. MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8, 1993 Harvey Reder, 3598 Livingston Avenue, stated he believed the additional parking spaces should be added behind the house rather than in the front along the existing driveway, and he believed they could gain access from Blaine Avenue rather than from Livingston Avenue. He noted there was a difference in the grade between the street and the back yard, but believed that two parking spaces could be provided in that area. If the additional spaces were located behind the house they would be screened from his view. Greg Goodfellow. 3585 Livingston Avenue, stated he had submitted a letter to the Council. He undersuxid that the reason for the Conditional Use Permit was because Mrs. McKinney wanted to sell her property and would realize more profit it if were sold as a duplex. He suited that he understood that at one time the property had been used as a tri-plex. He reviewed his letter and noted that he understcKxl that the units used did not meet current building code requirements for a duplex. He was concerned about the decrease in property values for the adjacent residents. He stated he was opposed to the Council granting the Conditional Use Permit. Mayor Callahan reminded the audience that their City Attorney had concluded that the City must grant the Conditional Use Permit because the use existed prior to the new ordinance. City Attorney Kevin Staunton reviewed the legal position of the City regarding granting ot the Conditional Use Permit. Harvey Reder stated he was concerned about new residents ot the property storing boats and other recreational vehicles outside on the property. Councilmember Goetten stated that nothing of that nature should be parked on the lot because it was so small that there will be only four spaces for vehicles. City Attorney Staunton commented that the City has the authority to regulate the storage ot vehicles on a property. Mike Anderson. 3580 Livingston Avenue, inquired about whether there were three rental units within the residence. Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth responded that the application involved a request for two legal rental units in the home. The bedrooms in the basement are not legal because they lack adequate egress windows. Karen Cuff. 3572 Livingston Avenue stated she was concerned about the drainage in the area if the two additional parking spaces were to be placed in the front yard, and the effects of the additional hard surface coverage on the property and potentail drainage problems on her property. Councilmember Kelley commented he favored placing the two additional parking space* behind the house and having them access from Blaine Avenue. Mabusth commented there would be a problem with the additional hard surface coverage in the front as drainage is a problem on Livingston Avenue. She noted staff would explore gaming access from Blame Avenue. Mayor Callahan requested this item be tabled tor two weeks to allow staff to work out a solution. He noted that the Council favors the parking spaces accessing from Blame Avenue. ♦9. 10. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8, 1993 Councilmcinbcr Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to table ^1860 Conditional Use Permit tor Zelma McKinney, 3599 Livingston Avenue to allow statf to work out a parking solution. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. *7. ^t'lSTS CHARLES AND SHIRLEY PYLE, 3548 IVY PLACE, VARIANCE, RESOLUTION ^3352. Councilmember Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, tor approval of #1878 Charles and Shirley Pyle. 3548 Ivy Place, Variance to allow 15' zone hardcover variance for addition to existing residence, and adopt Resolution #3352. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. *8.. #1879 ALLEN AND KATHLEEN BAKKE, 1127 LOMA LINDA AVENUE, VARIANCE, RESOLUTION #3353. Councilmember Gotten moved, Kelley seconded, for approval of #1879 Allen and Kathleen Bakke 1127 Loma Linda Avenue, after-the-fact setback and hardcover variance for deck constructed/refurbished in 1985, and to adopt Resolution #3353. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. #1880 THOMAS AND .1ANE REGNIER, 1205 ELMWOOD AVENUE, RENEWAL VARIANCE. RESOLUTION #3354. Councilmember Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, for approval of #1880 Thomas and Jane Regnier. 1205 Elmwood Avenue, renewal of side street setback variance for consu’uction ot additions to t e existing residence, and to adopt Resolution #3354. Ayes 3, Nays 0. Motion carried. #1882 JOHN M. O’SULLIVAN/O’SULLIVANS, 2420 SHADYWOOD ROAD, COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron gave the staff report and stated tliat an agreement had been reached and staff would draft a resolution amending the commercial site plan approval for Council action at their next meeting Ml. #1883, STEVEN M. ENGLUND, 3855 CHERRY AVENUE, VARIANCE, RESOLUTION #3355. Councilmember Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, for approval of #1883, Steven M Englund, 385s Cherry Avenue, for approval of a lot area variance for construction of a single family residence on a 0.37 acre parcel, and adopt Resolution #3355. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. #1884, ORVILLE FISHER, 475 OXFORD ROAD, VARIANCE, RESOLUTION #3356. Councilmember Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, for denial of #1884 Orville Fisher. 475 O^^^r oa for an after-thc-faci variance and to adopt Resolution #3356 denying the variance. yes , ays Motion carried. L CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8, 1993 13.. FLAG LOTS - REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Assisiam Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gatfron gave the staff report and reviewed the proposed new standards for tlag lots in the City of Orono. He stated that staff and Planning Commission recommend that the access corridor be created as an outlot. and that the City retain the ability to require a shared access between the two lots in instances where curb cuts are a concern. He noted that the outlois would be 30 ’ in width. He indicated the Planning Commission ’s intent is that the proposed standards apply onlv to front/back lots after the ordinance is adopted. Mayor Callahan moved. Kelley seconded, to subscribe to the Planning Commission recommendation regarding flag lots and staff is hereby directed to draft an ordinance implementing these requirements. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. Mayo’’ Callahan moved. Goetten seconded, to e.xtend the moratorium on flag lots until December 31, 1993. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. 14. TYPE 1 WETLAND BUILDABILITY CREDIT Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron reviewed the staff position on the current status of wetland regulations and potential issues which need to be addressed by the City. He discussed the current wetland designations on the City maps and discussed the scope of wetland classification which had been enacted as part of the State Wetland Conservation Act and now requires that wetland alteration permits be issued for developments encroaching into wetland areas. Mayor Callahan commented that he felt the Cityordinance > should not be changed and that development approvals be contingent upon approvals from the othei agencies dealing with the preservation of wetlands and mitigation of impacts upon those wetlands. City Administrator Ron Moorse slated that as a proposed subdivision is developed it has to be done in conjunction w ith the other agencies and he believed that should be taken into account when a project is going through Orono ’s subdivision process. Discussion ensued regarding whether the City of Orono should become involved in regulation of wetland mitigation or leave that aspect of development to be regulated by the other agencies. Mayor Callahan felt strongly that approval by the other agencies throughout the developmental process was sutficieni to prevent lots being platted in unbuildable areas, and he did not believe the City should invest lime and funds m something that was already being regulated. City Engineer Glenn Cix^k commented that most potential developers request subdivision approval from the City first and the approvals of these other agencies comes after that fact. Discussion ensued regarding the length of time for processing a subdivision application and the possibility of requiring that the approvals from other agencies come before the final approval by the City. Cou.Tcilmembcr Goetten stated she felt that was necessary. Mayor Callahan stated he felt that the City should require developers to obtain agency approvals before City approval. He stated that he also believed that the Planning CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8, 1993 Commission should not attempt to deal with wetland mitigation issues. He stated that the Council would not adopt a formal resolution regarding this issue that evening. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Callahan slated that he would be attending a meeting with the Mayors of the cities of Long Uke Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach this week. He also stated that the City ot Orono signed a con.ract with the City of Long l^ke for both Fire and Police protection. Councilmember Kelley noted that he had read the Minutes of the LMCD meeting and they were accurate. M ivor C illahan stated that in an update from the Metropolitan Council they will now negotiate with cto on varls operatitinal tssues'^ as par, of any comprehensive plan amendment proeess. It will include things like sharing k)f governmental services and affordable housing. Councilmember Goetten nave an update on the Willow Drive Task Force and noted that the Mayor of I 1.1 ik- said thev were not going to support the left turn restrictions. The Committee decided not to go ahead w'uh litis plan, fhey are urging that MnDOT continue its efforts to achieve completion of the Willow and 12 safety improvements by the spring of 1995. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *15.EXTENSION OF PROSECUTION CONTRACT PrTcculbn Se^ 0. Motion carried. 16. LONG LAKE ANNEXATION/SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #3357. City Administrator Ron Moorse gave the staff report and stated that the ^Jl^^dThTc^ new resolution approved. Mayor Callahan commented he supported the change as it Torro Jf a buTden. He fell the last paragraph should be left in and he supported u as presented. Mayor Callahan moved. (kK-tten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3357 agreement in the form as submitted by the City of U?ng Uke. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. 17. UNDERGROUND TANK RE.MOVAL UPDATE Mayor Callahan discussed the problem of removal of Ihe contaminate assTKiated with this project. He felt that they should proceed as rapid y as ps»s CITV COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8, 1993 dealt with. He felt that it should be handled by a professional firm if necessary, raiher than attempt to save funds by doing it ourselves. Public Works Director John Gerhardson stated that further testing is needed underneath the gas tank to determine the exter. of leakage. Councilmember Kelley stated he was concerned about gas tanks at marinas and other facilities leaking and how such leaks could be prevented in the future. Mr. Gerhardson stated that all underground fuel tanks should be registered and tested and replaced when a change of ownership occurs. He noted that testing was done on a subjective basis. Counci.member Kelley requested staff to make an inventory of tanks in the City and report on when they were tested and the schedule for testing them. Councilmember Kelley thanked John Gerhardson for removing the old City buildings and saving the City money. He complimented him on the excellent job he did. *18.. CERTIFICATE OF EXCELLENCE IN FINANCL\L REPORTING AWARD Councilmember Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, that the Council congratulate Finance Director Tom Kuehn and the Financial staff for the City’s obtaining the G.F.O.A. Certificate of Achievement for Excellence m Financial Reporting for the 1992 Comprehensive Annual Finance Report; and acknowledges the valuable assistance provided by the audit staff of Malloy, Karnowski. Radosevich and Co. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. *19. LICENSES Councilmember Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, for approval of the following licenses: Septic System Installer Gambling lacense Resolution #3358 One Day Set-Up Permit - Quickway Excavation Rockford Lions Mound Northwest Tonka Club at Navarre Lanes 3435 Shoreline Drive Minnetonka Center for the Arts 2240 North Shore Drive Holiday House Event November 18, 1993 Approximately 6*10:W p.m. Ayes 3. Nays 3. Modon carried. •20. BILES Councilmember Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3. Navs 0. Motion carried. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8, 1993 ADJOURNMENT Mavor Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. Ayes 3. Nays 0. 00 Motion carried. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATriEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. Citv Administrator ^0, . *«• C/ry ? ,<3 From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator November 17, 1993 #1842 Tom and Sheila Browne. 760 South Brown Road - Request to Modify Approved Development Plan Please review tlie enclosed staff memo dated November 10 for background on the request to modify original development plan. The request did not alter the original findings or conditions of the resolution that granted approval of variance application #1842. Modiftcations involved intensification of structure within the O-lOO’ lakeshore protected area consisting of a 3 - V/i' overhang over side door connecting to door of three-season porch, 3'/^’ cantilevered expansion to sou^ with second stor> deck enclosure and structural instability of existing deck where a three-season porch is to be located requires reconstruction of deck. Please note none of the improvements involved further encroachment into the existing setback fromTanager Lake. Planning ConLmissi«)ii Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the modifications to the original development plan as proposed. Resolution No. 3314 need not be amended. Amended plans may ni>w be approved with the current building permit application. To: From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator November 10. 1993 //1842 Tom and Sheila Browne. 760 South Brown Road - Request to Modify Approved Development Plan Exhibits A - B - C-1 - C-2 - D - E - F - O - Applicants ’ Addendum Original Elevations Approved Site Plan Approved Floor Plan (Deck/Three-Season Porch) Amended Elevations Floor Plan - Second Level Deck Plat Map Resolution No. 3314 On August 9. 1993 Council approved setback and hardcover variances to allow applicants to install three-season porch ner an existing deck, an expanded deck connecting side deck with three-season porch limited u, 250 s.f. and the enclosure of an upper level deck as part of a master bedrvX)ni expansion. Tl. ^ cement slab was to remain based on the area limitations of the properly. During construction specific alterations had to be made that could not be approved by staff and requires Council review and action. Please review applicants ’ addendum. Exhibit A. that reviews the entire matter. It is the normal procedure for staff to present the issue before the Council. In turn. Council would refer the matter back to the Planning Commis. ion for further review. At this time of year, the next meeting of the Planning Commission would be in January of 1994 and applicant must finalize the alterations before the winter. Planning Commission members are asked to consider the amended request and make a recommendation to the Council. .Staff has been asked to schedule the application before the Council at the November 22nd meeting. Review of Issues A. Second storv deck encK)sure. Review Exhibit B. Proposed enclosure was not to expand be>a>nd the existing building envelope. In order to make the enclosure function as an expansion of a bedroom area, the addition was extended .3-3‘/i’ beyond the building envelope to the south side of the residence (refer to Exhibit D). The expansn)n beyond the existing building envelope involved an intensification of structure within the lakeshorc protected area. Zoning File #1842 November 10, 1993 Paee 2 of 2 B. I hrce-season porch. Both the Building Inspector and the contractor have concurred that the e.xisting foundation supporting the deck on which the three-season porch is to be constructed would not be sufficient to support the structure. The underlying deck shall be replaced but will not be e.xpanded upon. Joe Richter of the DNR confirmed in a telephone conversation that based on their original review of the issues, as long as the deck envelope is not expanded upon that they would have no problem with the improvement as amended. The improvements involving the three-season porch would also involve new structural work within lakeshore protected area. C. Overhang along south side of stnicture. .Applicant wishes to install a 3-3 '/i* wide overhang connecting die side door with the three-season porch. This was not considered during the first review and because it involves an intensification of structure within a lakeshore protected area, staff had no authority to approve the alteration. D. Connecting/new deck. In Council ’s approval, they allowed applicant to connect side deck with an existing deck adjacent to the three-season porch. The connecting deck area could not exceed a total of 250 s.f. Refer to Exhibits C-1 and C-2. The Planning Commission did not address the matter of the connecting deck at the time ot their review and was approved by the Council. Note that all the improvements above do not involve additional hardcover nor further encroachment into the lakeshore protected area. Review Exhibit G. Per the variances approved in Resolution No. 3314, the resolution need not be amended as a result of the amendments to the development plan. Staff Recommendation Staff would recommend approval of the amended development plan based on the findings set forth in applicant ’s addendum and that there is no increase in hardcover nor expansions proposed cK'ser to I’anager fake. November 5, 1993 Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Variance Approval #1842 Dear Ms. Mabusth: Thank you for your time on November 3, 1993 regarding the minor changes on our variance approval. Per the City’s request, the following changes and reasons tor them are addressed. Enclosing of Existing 2nd Story Peck We started this project with a plan, but as we have learned in remodeling, even the well thought- out plans may change. A wall that we were expecting to remove was found to be a load bearing wall. Removing this wall would have turned into a major construction project and considerable expense. With the wall remaining in place and the 4 1/2 / 12 pitch of the roof, this greatly reduced the amount of actual living space we were hoping to gain. The pitch causes a reduction in head room 2’-3’ from each outside wall. As we of>ened everything up we decided that in order to eliminate this h; dj.hip we could raise the ceiling height by changing the pitch of the roof to a 9 / 12. In turn a 30" to cantilever was needed to gain the living space we were kxrking for. This cantilever extends to the south, which meets the DNR requirement of no turther extension to the east or toward the 929.4 water table line. We have also discussed this with our neighbor to the south, and she has no problems with the extension. Other issues: We were told by the window company, Pella, that our existing windows to remain in the room would not be classified as egress if installed today. Also building codes require windows to be at least 18" off the tloor or they must be tempered. The existing w indow s are 6"-8" off the tloor and we considered this change safer, as it is a child’s bedroom. 'Hiree Season Porch Jeanne Mabiisth November 5, 1993 Page 2 Upon further review of the approval for the three season porch, it has been advised by our builder and the City Inspector, Lyle, that the existing pole footings are not strong enough to support any additional weight. The pole footings liave moved out over the last ten years and the joists are bowed. Therefore, for clarification purposes we would like the City to be aware that the e,xisting deck needs to be removed and install stronger lootings that the City recommends to support the new structure. Per your advice, I contacted Mr. J(>e Richter ot the DNR on November 4, 1993 to discuss this issue. He informed me that per their approval dated July 23, 1993, they had no problem with the removal as long as the new structure is not built any closer to the 929.4 water line. It would be built in the exact location of the deck that was removed. Weather Protective Porch/Overhang Since our back door does not have a protective entrance from the weather, we would like to install a 3’*3’6 ’* overhang that would run from our back door and tie m with our three season porch. Please refer to diagram. This would not affect any hardcover as tlrs would be over the deck area. Additional 250 square feet of New Deck Please refer to design for changes that the Council allowed during the approval process, We look forward to the City’s review of these minor changes and the November 22 Council meeting so we can prtK'eed with construction. Sincerely yours, /O^ — '^om & Sheila Browne 760 S. Brown Road Orono. MN 55391 An K > r .V ... ......* I. i \ •»..«» •. ••• »-i, \\. \ • • # I * I l;;._ \>•** •tt i. I r. ■ti' r y ■ i*.v/ 'A: ‘■•i ^ i t ♦ s ^ i *»T ^ i V- rr. Z'# ?1 t 0 r* *> ; -4 I • I -4 I .•. I H .si ? c *•.•■; fey ><1 U r^i * ^ •I. •I W . r<J*•I A • ^ 1 .J.;-- 'C 0 5 I R !■ *» • irs M / «£»ui.xrw MO II g*,CTysf.i/ ( c fc 0 ^^i . 0 i \'^1 f ui5 I 1 * ^ T V* ul 6 r -A ■ V:l'' ± -^1r- V ^ 5^ -»wc Ml 0 •PI r >/ V/v-::'-:* .-:Vv.;.,-5 1 t\ ■i3. '-y ' ':'■ -:■-•i. .. !*S •J ':M Mn '■::y'i ■A ^K. 4Ji 5 1 If"s-1 « » »• ■ 'r;r -1, ;i.4< « •• . *. 9* . S •• • , * * ‘ f • •‘y •* * • i t « • • i ' ^ :^‘V I * t % »i *’ • ■5r I, ; . ) \ ? r i o I I% “r “ -t* iM « /■ { i j 1 ! ________________ r V. .-.J V &i Xi {¥\ % 1 • 0 «» *'^ A » O.' w w ^4a W / '.I. nv «• I'^'v Jf/ »<’ i n.»' - ■i > . . t « . \ B 6t|.' * I ti tf» ;l > |4«IK t thFTtfl III •I 1% « *- m?V' » »iM ■! 15 -n / / \ ^ .>• ■ i- CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 3 !! _____ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C-1) AND (L-l) file no. 1842 WHEREAS, Thomas R. Browne and Sheila R. Browne (hereinatter die applicants-) are owners of the propert>- located at 760 South Brown Road w.thin the City of Orono and legally described as follows: The south 396 feet of the west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 3. Township 117 North. Range 23 West of the fifth principal meridian, except the south 93 feet thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Mumcipal Zoning Code Sections 10.56. Subdivision 16 (C-1) and (L-l) to permit the enclosure of an 8 77™ upper level deck locattd 56’ from Taneger Lake where a 100• setback „ requ«d ^ Where Sw Structure already exists at 56’. screen porch addiuon propo^ at a a 100’ setback is required and where a stnicmre exists at 48 , a deck addition a pr^Msed screen poreh to be placed 55’ instead of lOO’ as ^ Lists at 55’ and a 20’ x 26’ pool/deck structure to be located 59 from lake instead of th required 100’. Hardcover variances are proposed within the 0-75’ setback area at., . s. . or 20.2% where 17.5% exists and where none is allowed NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1842. The property is located in the RR- IB Rural Residential -Toning Distnet two acres of dry buildable area. The property consists of a total of 4.9 acres and has 41.315 s f- or .95 acres of contiguous dry buildable area. Page 1 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^ ^ 3. W The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 19. 1993 and recommended approval of the proposed variances as amended based upon the following findings: A. The 4.9 acre parcel has approximately one acre of contiguous dry buildable area . B E. Shoreland Regulations now require 100’ setback for all structures from the Recreational Development lake that encroaches the propeny placing severe restrictions on the building envelope and making existing sirucnires non- conforming. The existing septic system has been found to meet the 3 ’ separation required by new Shoreland Regulations and septic code. The majority of the dry buildable area, approximately two-thirds of the dry buildable envelope is located within the 0-75’ setback area where no hardcover or structural improvements are allowed. Structural setbacks for the newly classified shoreland property make it unbuildable for new development. F. Proposed structural improvements are at 2,562.6 s.f. or 6.2%, well under the allowed 15% strucniral coverage. G. Total hardcover based on the dry buildable portion of the 4.9 acre parcel is proposed at 5,^98.8 s.f. or 14.5%. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not zpply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variaiices would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty ; is necessary to preserve a nibstanfial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -- _______ 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, repons by City staff, conunents by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C-1) and (L- 1) approving an enclosure of an 8'A’ x T upper level deck, installation of a 19li ’ x 16 ’ screen porch over an existing deck and a connecting deck addition of 250 s.f. and denies variances for a 20 ’ X 26’ dcck/pool strucmrc, subject to the following conditions; 1 . Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 9, 1994). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 3’ ______ Adopted by the City CouncU of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of August, 1993. At EST: Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of i^gust, 1993 by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor and City Qerk Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Page 4 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLimON OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On rhis dav of Aaau^-^ , --r’ , Public widiin and for said county. personallfappeared (<rwnf r? ir/ JAe.M. ,1993 before me a Noury '7Z" . ^ ■ known to ine to be the per.onfs) described in and who exMuted i£ foregotol Instnilnenl andTcknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ho,«5'5!SJ»?- SSS**"* My oomiilMion «iptfw V4.'Xt-y notary public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared IK known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed *e foregoing instniment, cndTcknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 ^7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor Callahan and Orono Counciimembcrs Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 19. 1993 c % #1860 Zelma McKinney, 3599 Livingston Avenue - Continuation*^^ of the Review of Conditional Use Permit Application 3!/ % List of Exhibits A - Council Minutes 11/8/93 B - Engineer ’s Report 11/17/93 C - Option 1 - Parking Plan D - Option 2 - Parking Plan E - Letter to M. Swanson, 3596 Lyric (neighbor to south of McKinney residence) F - Gayle Siegler Utter of 11/18/93, faxed 12:00 p.m. 11/19/93 Status of Application At the November 8th meeting of the Council, members tabled all review of the application until the Engineer had an opportunity to review the possibility of a secondary access off Blaine Avenue and parking area to rear of residence. Neighbors at that meeting voiced concern with the visual impact of additional parking and increased drainage problems from additional hardcover with the Livingston Avenue driveway/parking plan. Residents were concerned with the visual impact and intensification of parking where grassed areas had always existed and hardcover intensification magnifying historic drainage problem within Livingston Avenue watershed. The City Engineer has prepared a plan for another option with a second access off Blaine, review Exhibit D. He notes a moderately steep driveway off Blaine would require at least 3’ to 4 ’ of excavation and the insullation of retaining walls around the perimeter of parking spaces. The alteration would also require the extension of a back stoop at the rear of the house. The Engineer ’s concern for option 2 is that it will have the greatest impact on the property ^ that driveway would have poor sight distance. In order to improve safety for vehicles backing out on to Blaine, there would be a need to cut 3* to 4 ’ into the higher side elevations a distance of 30’. This would require major alterations within side street yard of property to south, where owner has installed cyclone fencing and retaining walls. The parking stalls meet the required side street setback of 15’. The City may wish to monitor use of Blaine access driveway before requiring extensive land alterations to improve visibility. Signage may be considered during this period warning drivers of a hidden driveway and minor alterations within property to lessen sighting problem. Zoning File ^1860 November 19. 1993 Page 2 Staff has provided various spokespersons of the neighborhood copies of the most recent Engineer's report and site plan for Option 2. It is staff s understanding that the neighbors will be meeting to review the new Information. A neighbor advised staff that the property owner to the south, the Michael Swansons, have been advised of the recent meetings involving the application. It is not clear whether the Swansons have been advised of the plan to install parking stalls to the south of the property. The City has sent a copy of the Engineer's report and parking plans to Mr. and Mrs. Swanson. We hope that the City will receive their comments prior to the meeting. Please review Option I, Exhibit C, the acnial driveway curves within 5* of east lot line at street intersection of property. If Option I is to be approved, the dnveway would have to be realigned resulting in the removal of one manire tree in the street yard. The parking stall closest to Livingston would be installed witliin major portions of existing drive. Parking stalls would meet the required yard setbacks. The City Engineer may be asked to comment on the impact of the additional hardcover on ihe existing Livingston Avenue drainage facility. Options of Action Concerning Off Street Parking 1. Require no off street parking at this time based on the fact that parking has never been an issue for this property when used as a triplex; or 2.Adopt parking Option 1 requiring reai’^nment of drive, removal of mature tree in street yard and two off street parking stalls installed per plan. This alternative would allow the backing out maneuver on site; or 3. Adopt parking Option 2 Alternative A Alternative B Installii^ access drive and parking area as shown on Option 2 meeting all required side and rear setbacks. The alternative plan would call for the backing out of cars on to roadway and the need for additional grading 30’ to south and north of proposed curb cut. Approval of Option 2 parking and access layout but delay land alterations to south until City deems driveway a safety problem. Conditional use permit resolution would have to be written to include owner ’s responsibility for making the necessary alterations at a later date. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8. 1993 4.french creek preserve by SUSAN WILSON fr Mayor Callahan moved. Goctten seconded, that the Park Name for the ponion of the old treaOTcnt plant property retained by the City as French Creek Preserve. Ayes 3. ay carried. 4A. CROSS COUNTRY SKIING AT ORONO GOLF COURSE Kelley moved. Goetten seconded, to develop a cross country ski trail at the Orono Golf Course. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. PLa NNINC commission comments - Janke Berg. Representative There were no comments from the Planning Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Harvey Reder requested permission to speak regarding Item #6. .M Ingleman. 350 Old Crystal Bay Road, stated he was concerned a^t the of Hiehway 15 and County Road 51 . Mayor Callahan assured him that theCity ll^^k Worn'S^ S WrJ^ti* 1 pro^Ca t^main«nm« project on County Road 15. s. #I7»0 errv or or (WO, looo old crystal bay road south , subdivision /final PLAT APPROVAL, RESOLUTION #3351. C^;SC5Sd‘^rs'Ltision‘tIS CL^ocion carried. •. \/#lW0 ZELMA MCKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT .M they aho emmot require the resitknee «. be Jequire^nt. d^ the petitioner to supply two additional parking spaces to p y stalls be provided for two residential units. Gayle Siegler was present representing her mother. parking spaces required will result in the loss of grass y CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8, 1993 from his view. r.re« Goodfellow 3585 Livingston Avenue, stated he had submitted a lener to the Council. He undersHtod that the reason for the Conditional Use Permit was because Mrs. McKinney and would realize more profit it if were sold as a duples. He sated matT^time the property had been used as a tri-ples. He reviewed his tetter ami understood that the units used did not meet current building code requirements for » , concerned about the decrease in property values for the adjacent residents. He state e was oppo to the Council granting the Conditional Use Permit. Mayor Callahan reminded the audience that their City Attorney had concluded that rte I”" I^e'c".S!ional Use Permit because the use existed prtor to ‘he Staunton reviewed the legal position of the City regarding granting of the C Harvey Reder stated he was concerned about new resideno ^ recreational vehicles outside oi. the property, m (,g j,nly four spaces for vehicles. ^“Atl^^^o'^rrui:.;” ^ » «gu J stotag. or vehicles on a property. Mike Anderson. 3580 Livingston Avenue '"‘•“h''* d« residence. Building and "X b^mem legal bec«« d«y request for two legal rental units in the home. Tne oeo tack adequate egress windows. Karen Cuff. 3572 Livingston fror^d*t^d ‘*e* effi^rtte'al^kiiiri^ Counciln«mber Kelley h' IlTdfadStrriltTdSe »C"n the front as drainage is a problem on Livingston Avenue. She noted staff would explore gaining access from Blame Avenue. Mayor Callahan requested this item he tabled for rwo ‘ not^ that the Council favors me parking spaces accesstng from Blame Avenue. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 8, 1993 ■1 mber K«ll-y moved, Goetten seconded, lo table 3. Nays 0. ^""■^fengston Avenue to allow staff to work out a parking - • Motion carried. 4 • Resolution #3352. Ayes o. _______ _____ *8.. VARIANCE KATHLEEN BAKKE, 1127 LOMA ---------------------- #1879 RESOLUTION #3353. eonstructedlrefurb^hed ,n .985. _____kveNTIE, RENEWAL VARIANCE. »9. 0. UUO t.:niwww« -------- > Re^lulion #3354. Avcs j. *--7- >'• existing residence, an o op . sHADYWOOD ROAD, COMMERCIAL I18S2 JOHN M. O'SUU-IVAN/O’SULLIVANS. -4 SLAD SITE PLAN REVIEW ........... report and satedsiiHSr--— _________ aVKNI’E. VARIANCE 11. 0.37 acre P«cel. and «iopt R ________„,.KrE. RESOLUTI-----------EE=^==^S= for an after-the-fact var ce and to aoop Motion carried. M O V .. I* 3: T M 1 O 5 1 T F* C* M E r- T »I» • *•-< C* »Z i i-i r E =•- o ^ u Bonestroo Rosene Andeiiik & Associates fc.- *4/ *1 • . A • * • • - a I ! • -'VH •• . 0^^ • 1.4^ **l ♦ .• I •AifiT*' ’* > V •» -»•• -• ■ -'SlllA* ' Engineers A Architects November 17. 19V3 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building and Zoning Administrator City Of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 Re: McKinney Duple.x File No. 139.1H60 »srrf ^ 'ipre^# ^ S'-sfff #f ’ “'eita ^rr-•R*»;ee A. a A *1 A R| • i«w<ns^A Pf •ye-. V ^ : A Pf . r.-« Pf P lAj PP PhWI J Pf A)AP| M P.T7 4 •(* ** ^^9try, W ^n PI Pf .^ffy 3 PrffPWn Pf • AAgfAen P| V414 f P^ Vila A STA M C j^V WTfA P| Cjrtft i ec;e^8^ p| Pi^ ptra P# P*“»4i i C.thwfu •• V./»s • JU.».» o* «• A*.^ P# %;• I *• ^«a 1 Pi M r*.** . P..W..V/ pf I *f |« • **#A* **• Cf »•* «r *.14, (** ,3m<A^ • \,»/SA»*' #.».*! W-* -*f Tri ftn • tf» C'-4*tP^ P ' • ••Of* M •'•••rs ’.A* •sjrpr* V r’sew I . |»t Dear Jeanne. Subsequent to our site inspection we have prepared this kiter to discuss two options to provide MH» additional parking spaces at the pn>pi>sed duplex on Livingston Avenue. One iipiion. as noted in our previous letter dated NoveMibcr 4. 1993, includes one parking %pacc along the cast side of the prage and one at the 30 toot iront yard setback. This option would encroach into the side yard setback unless the existing driveway was reconstructed further west. This ItKation would align the driveway with the garage .md provide additional mom ft)t parking aU»ng the east li»t line. This rc.illgnment would .dso require the removal of a large tree m the front yard. A second option would he to a>n.struei a driveway and two parking spaces behind the house. This is a feasible option, however, the yard wi>uld need to he lowered from two to three feet to arnstruct the driveway at maximum grade. A moderately steep driveway would require at least three to four feet i»f excavation. TTiis grade change would require retaining walla around the perimeter of the parking spaces and an extension of the back stoop. The driveway would have piHir sight distance and would create a safety prooiem tiu vehicles backing out onto Blaine Avenue, unless the pound on either side of the driveway is cut three to four feet higher for a distance of 30 feel. This option may alxti affect the lot ii» the south as the lot has retaining wails and a chain-link fence that would now be higher tlinti the adjacent ground. The only option that does not increa.ve the hardcover .ind runoff onto Uvinptun Avenue is the option of a second driveway from Blame Avenue. I!«'wvvei. this option would have the greatest impact on the property. Please contact me at this ofAcc if you have any questiiins regarding this matter. Yours vety truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK A ASSOt lATC.S. INC JLrv, Shawn D. Cuscafton. f .£. 11-04-1993 l3:Sa ®12 ’’ll<- ie T-'S irT*BCNE3TRCC i -15:C.z-. Ui iuJ IlUJ •2: (A .tail 3c. 52 Jf FIEL.D A N J:___SURVEVQWg ^9 H /l\ MUtNiMTAlin HAHAIIT AVI. CftT»H CERlTHFICATtE OF SUIIliVEV Harvey l4cKlnney________ LIVINGSTON 'uijiSi AVENUE Scale: V* - 30' Description: Lots 1.1 and 12, Block 4, Navarre Heights. r:.'’:::::.,**;:':r o. " ..................................................... iMa 24th daw July <Uiu(a* COAN^ PifLO A M01AAK L i:-ia-lS93 13:2:2C\£2"^CC 3. -3SC.= . o: I Hi BOTCNt FIELD A WOWAK 10^=^-^ r?FrrT—“ suwvgvowS-...tBS®SSSmi^3jLlXi 6ii\PjU^ MINNUMUI, MtNNiUTA n“" 'OPT/0 H N CERiniFflCATB OB SUEVEY Harvey McKinney LIVINGSTON • • • • • • ••100 (5 in fr 7 C3 I.T Wl •V M H Wl .1 % mIS«9 erri^ •4 # «. —2C318 f0>2 V? m IM lU 9 Ij............... ••77 •..»•• ••*^ ••f»t I fy; fh«« l»»lt ft • irut •«# ••rrtet rtprtttnftf Itn *f.• •“fTJf.H Mit e«wP#trltt «f t^9 Itn# •§•¥• ittcrfbtd tnt of tht loctHon of til if tny, fhoroon, on^ til irltlfclt tncrtocMntntt^ If tny, from or on tolO lino. |0tf«9 tuft 24th #oy of *luly £ttAn^ nno * ncmn I _______________ i7»uQ4tytr L......M7fH" Description: Lots 1.1 and 12, Block 4, Nayarre Heights. Rseoii No.I 1 4,0^ <y o >•A November 19. 1993 CITYof ORONO Municipal OfTices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. WN 55356 Meilini Address: P 0 Box 66 Crystal Bay. VN 55323 0066 Mr. and Mrs. Michael Swanson 3596 Lyric Avenue Wayzau. Minnesota 55391 Re: #1860 Zelma McKinney. 3599 Livingston Avenue Dear Mr. and Mrs. Swanson: You may remember receiving a public hearing notice advising of your ncighboi. M«. McKinney’s, application for a conditional use permit to permit the continu^ duplex use of her residence. Although the property has had three residential units, Mrs. McKinney wishes to s»k approval for only a duplex use. Orono code allows the continuation of a nonconfonmng use that eSted prior to Ly code amendment. Current code only allows single family use in your zonii« dijoto.'^ Ai teeem meetings of the CouncU. *e City has been cottsidenng iimnoveitieiiis needed to suppon ihe duplex use. Propoid parking unproveinents tave laised mator concents for the adj^ neighbors. Many are concerned with the unpact of addntonal parking on the site as shown on Option 1 enclosed herewith. At the November 8th meeting of the Council, staff was asked to explore the p^ibUiiy of an additional drive and parking area being installed to the tear of Ihe pixtperty that woul nw access off Blaine Avenue. Because this option wiU involve improvemeno do^ to your ^ iSTiite. staff has enclosed new irfonnalion developed for consideianon of the Councu at then November 22nd meeting. raised during the review of the McKinney application. TfM»o« 473-7357 • FAX 473-®5l® Please review the options. Engineer’s report and staff report enclosed and contact me prior to the meeting so that I may relay any concerns that you may ha\ e concerning either Option 1 or 2. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/ch Enc. cc: Gayle Siegler c/o Zelma H. McKinney « ♦ • • • •9 f •# Nofvtmbtr 18,1903 jMnntMabusth BuMNno and Zoning Administrator CkyofOrono P.0.6ox 00 CrysM Bay. MN 58323 Ra: Zonino Fla # 1800 - CandWonal U$a Parma Owir MSi. Mibuith* by tha mambart of Orono Cty Cound. UvtngMon Av*nu» SsSSSSsSssJ- 5gs&ggsasp-M=S~?s=r.a:Ma _________________________________________ "•8^ “*****?* tinrf^SSyjamant m bar own nalqbbortiMd^ HS5S!SS^JS.«!'«si “'-------- H«/lno S SSL'iSA'SX •sKssn^.-Syx.'sssssXS£TSnAgammmmiiMv»fKt^ ^SloZSySi!^^ not andoraaan unlun n«* y» to. ,our ecn-«^ 0. 0. Binoarsly Oaytal^r To:Chairman Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Vlcmber?^^ .’ Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers '• Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^* C/V C From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron. Assistant Planning & Zoning AdministrSWj^ ^ November 18. 1993 V Subject:#1882 John OSulIivan/O ’Sullivans. 2420 Shady wood Road - Amended Commercial Site Plan Approval - Resolution List of Exhibits A B Resolution Memo and Exhibits of 11/8/93 Resolution No. 2229 adopted by the City Council on July 27. 1987 approved a commercial site plan for 2420 Shady wood Road. That approval required that ^ drive on the north side of the building be posted as a fire lane per the site plan referenced as "85-018 revised 6/30/87". That fire lane had never been striped or marked, however, a portable "fire lane i*gn has been in use for a number of years. In response to staffs recent request to stripe the fire lane per the 1987 site plan. Mr. O’Sullivan applied for an amended commercial site plan approval to eliminate the fire lane. This was reviewed by the Plan*iing Commission at their October meeting, where they referred it to Council with a recommendation that the Police Chief review the matter. Prior to your last meeting. Mr. O’Sullivan met with the Police Chief and Building and Zoning Department staff, and an agreement suitable to all panies was reached regarding revised dimensions and location for the fire lane. At your November 8 meeting. Council directed staff to bring back a resolution for amending the 1987 commercial site plan approval. That resolution is attached for Council approval. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the revised comi lercial site plan fire lane requirements for O’Sullivan's at 2420 Shadywciod per the attached resolution. Moved by ___. seconited by . to adopt Resolution No. ____ Ayes; ___. nays; ____ L A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL PREVIOUSLY GRANTED VIA RESOLUTION NO. 2229 HLE NO. 1882 WHEREAS, pursuant to commercial site plan and building plan application file #958, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2229 on July 27. 1987, granting a conditional use permit per Municipal Code Section 10.40. Subdivision 4 (B). variances to Section 10.40. Subdivision 6 (E) and a variance to Section 10.61. Subdivision 10 and approved a commercial site plan and building plan application per Section 10.40. Subdivision 2 for the property at 2420 Shadywood Road which is legally described as follows: PID; 20-117-23 11 0002 Unplatted 20 117 23; Commencing at a point in North line of Section 20 distance 1.761.42 feet East from North 1/4 comer thereof thence South at right angles to a point in Southerly line of County Road No. 15 thence East along said road line 49.58 feet thence on a tangential curve to the left having a radius ot 841 51 eet distance 265.42 feet thence South 23 degrees 10 minutes West to center line of County Road No. 19 thence Northwesterly along said center line to North line of Government Lot 1 thence East to beginning except road Section 17 and 20; Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2229 approved a site plan referenced as drawing number 85-018 revised 6/30/87, which plan indicated a fire lane across the front of the building, such fire lane being approximately 14’ in depth and 64 ’ in width, and which fire lane was required in Condituin #3 of said resolution to be posted as a "Fire Lane"; and WHEREAS, said fire lane was never physically marked by striping or yellow curbing but was posted with a single portable sign; and WHEREAS, due to increased activity at the site the City directed the property owner. John O’Sullivan (hereinafter "the applicant"), to stripe the fire lane per the 1987 referenced plan, which resulted in the applicant filing application #1882. a request to amend the commercial site plan review to eliminate the fire lane, and Page I of 4 WHEREAS, on November 8. 1993 the applicant and the City agreed to an amended plan for the location, dimensions, and delineation and permanent marking of a fire lane at the front of the building. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota that the commercial site plan approval granted in Resolution No. 2229 is hereby amended as follows; 1 The site plan referenced as "85-018 revised 6/30/87" is amended by eliminating the 14' X 64' fire lane and replacing it with the fire lane plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. The firw lane shall be marked as follows: a. c. The curb shall be painted yellow between the outer edges of the two doorways. Signs shall be mounted adjacent to the outside of the doors, flush with the building and located approximately 3' in height, with arrows pointing towards the opposite door, and indicating "No Parking - Fire Lane". The existing portable sign shall continue to be placed on the pavement midway between the two entrance doors. Diagonal striping of the pavement will not be required, but the City reserves the right to review this in the future if the Police Chief deems it necessary. Enforcement of the fire lane shall be per items 2. 3 and 4 of Police Chief Stephen Sullivan's memo to all officers dated 9/1/93, attached to this resolution as Exhibit B All other requirements and conditions of Resolution No. 2229 shall remain in effect. Page 2 of 4 8 Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by compliance with the above conditions no later than January 1. 1994, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and coiv^tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automat.cally terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of November. 1 93. ATTEST Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric r*Jv.ard J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day ot November. 1993, by Edward J Callahan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Halhn. Mayor and City Cl^ of the City of Orono. a Minnesou municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUN rV Or HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of . 199___. before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared __________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199___. before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ___________________________________ known to me to be the person(s> described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 DATE: 9-1-93 EXHIBIT B RESOLUTION NO. TO: FROM: SUBJECT; All Officers Chief Sullivan O'Sullivans fire lane Contrary to rumor and incomplete information gathered about the fire lane at O'Sullivans, it was designated a fire lane by council resolution. Therefore, it is a valid fire lane. This memo is intended to clarify our policy. Our policy will be: No officer shall park a squad car in the fire lane once it is marked as described in the letter from A>o Lyle Oman to John O'Sullivan dated(V^^Ok«u!» ) 8-31-93. Officers shall give verbal warnings ^■"^to any driver who has parked in the fire lane. /T?) Tickets will be issued only in response to a request from an employee of O'Sullivans for an unattended vehicle which was left in the fire lane. Or, officers may issue a ticket if a citizen refuses to move the vehicle after they have received the verbal warning and request by the officer to move it. To: From: Date: Subject: Mavor Callalian and Orono Councilmcmbers Ron Moorse. City Administrator Michael P. GalTron. Assistant Planning & Zoning Aaminisirator November 8. 1993 /^1882 John O'Sullivan/O’Sullivan’s. 2420 Shadywood Road - Agreement Reached Mr. O’Sullivan met with the City Administrator, Police Chief, and Jeanne, Lyle and me this afternoon. Chief Sullivan had also been in contact with Don Brvee. Mound Lire Chief, just prior to the meeting. After a discussion of the history and need for this fire lane, we reached the following solution which is agreeable to City stall and Mr. O Sullivan. 1. The curb will be painted yellow between the outer edges of the two doorways. 2. The property owner will mount signs adjacent to the outside ol the doors, flush with the building and located appro.ximaiely 3 ’ in height, with arrows pointing towards the opposite door, and indicating "No Parking - Fire Lane . 3.The existing portable sign will continue to be placed on the pavement midway between the two entrance doors. 4. Diagonal striping of the pavement will not be reauired. but the Police Chief reserves the right to require that in the future if he deems it necessary. 5. Enforcement of the lire lane will be per items 2, 3. and 4 of Chief Sullivan’s memo to all officers dated 9/1/93. This configuration will meet the intent of the fire code yet allow additional legal parking at cither end of the fire lane. The result is an additional 2-3 legal parking stalis which actually reduces the degree of variance required with the initial approval in 1987. Stalf will draft a resolution amending the commercial site plan approval for Council action at vour next meeting. r ( TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmcnibcrs Ron Moorse. Cilv Administrator ^ ^ *>Jca.mc A. Mahusth. Building & Zoniiu! Administrator ^ ^ V\ November 17, 1993 ^ * (1^1886 Robert L. Melamed. 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road South • Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Additional Exhibit II - Amended Grading Plan Please review the enclosed stalt memo dated November 10. 1993 for detail information in reviewing this application. Applicant proposes the borrow and filling of 1.800 cubic yards for the purpose of restoring the original elevations along the nonh and western portions of the residential lot. The applicant ’s consultant has provided an amended grading plan fulfilling all requirements of the City Engineer. Shawn Gustafson has reviewed the amended plan and finds the plan satisfactory. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission ’s unanimous recommendation of approval. ch A RESOLLTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL LSE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE ii'1886 WHEREAS, Robert L Melamed, (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1(X)0 Old Crystal Bay Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and leeallv desciibed as: Lot 1. Block 1. French Lake at Orono. Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03. Subdivision 19 for a conditional use permit to permit the filling of approximately 1.800 cubic yards of clean fill. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDLNGS 1. This appIicMtion was reviewed as Zoning File #1886. 2. The property is k)cated in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 3 4 2 acres in area. I he property is approximately 4.4 acres in area. I'he Orono IManning Commission reviewed this applicativtn on November 15. 1993 and recommended unanimous approval of the application as proposed and to allow the fillm»’ of approximately 1.800 cubic yards of fill per grading plans submitted by Bruce W Schmitt & Asstx:iate.s. P A.. Sheet No. A1 dated November 8. 1993. Based i>n the following findings: Page 1 t>f 5 A.All land alterations will be located out of the 75' setback area ot the adjacent natural environment lakes. French Lake South Basin at 930 elevation and Se\va};e Lagoon at 934.3 elevation. B.Proposed land alteration shall be located out of the 2b’ setback area measured from the edge ot the wetland at the 931 elevation and the drainageway that intersects property at the northwest comer. C. The proposed land alteration will restore original grades at the north and w'estern ponions of property. 5.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the filling of appro.ximately l.8(X) cubic yards will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor post a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding p'‘t'pertv values and that the proposed level ot use of the property will lx* in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Courx:il hereby grants a conditional use permit per Mumc^pal Zoning Code Section 10.03. Subdivision 19 to wnnit the filling of approximately 1.800 cubic yards on the residential properly per approved grading plans prepared by Bruce W. Schmitt & Associates dated November 8, 1993. subjeci to the following conditions: Prior to any land alterations on this propeny. Applicant shall install required erosion control as shown on approved grading plan. Erosion controls shall remain in place until ground cover is restored. Applicant shall arrange for a pre-construction meeting with Orono staff pnor to the hauling of fill to the site. Applicant shall be responsible for the removal of any fill that mav be accidentallv placed on adjacent public roadway or on gravel dn've within Outlot A tliat currently serves MWCC facility and residential pniperty Page 2 of 5 3.Authorities jirantcd by this resolution run with the property and not with the owner but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (November 22. 1993). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions ot this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Tlie undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chair of title of the prt'periy. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of November. 1993. ATTI-Sr Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr.. Mavor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 k STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November. 1993. by Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notarv Public My Commission Expires Pace 4 of 5 STATK OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day ol . 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared________________________________ _______________________known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) NOTARY PUBLIC On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public wiihinand for said county, personally appeared________________________________ ___________________ n to me to be the person! s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Bc ( 56 Crystal i^ay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE /S'1886 & 1887 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 11/17/93 TO: Robert Melamed 1212 Wayzata Blvd. Wavzaia. MN 55391 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATIONS:i*yi88b Conditional Use Permit for Land Alterations #1887 Conditional Use Permit for Guest House DATE OF MEETING: 11/15/93 VOTE:4 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permits subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed approval resolutions. Please contact the City Offices if you have any questions pertaining to the statements made w ithin the resolutions. Your application is scheduled before the Council at their November 22. 1993 meeting, please note that meeting begins at 7:30 p.ni. ch /! TO:IMannimi Commission Members W Ron Moorse. Citv Administrator / FROM; Jeanne A. N'ahusih, Building Si Zoning Administrator DATE:November 10, 1993 Sl'IilECT: /(^1886 Robert L. Melamed. 1000 Old Cr>stal Bay Road South - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional use pemiit required for land alterations involving filling of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of till to restore and regrade elevations along the northern portions of tlie property. All cutting and fillip * activities will be located out of the 75 ’ setback of the surrounding natural environment lakes. Section 10.56. Subdivision 7 - Classification of Public Waters Natural Environment Lake French Lake South Basin 930 Sewage Lagoon 934.3 Scctio.. .0.56. Subdivision 16 (C) - Structural setbacks. All structures must be placed 150’ from OHWL of natural environment lake. I he property is served with sewer but this has no impact on the required setback for natural environment lakes. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - There will be no excavation witliin 75 ’ of the shoreline. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - I'here shall be no land alterations within 26 ’ of wetland or drainageway. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Propeny Owners List D Small Scale Grading Plan E * Engineer's Report 10/15/93 F • Engineer's Report IIM'93 El Utility Plan G - Large Scale Grading Plan Staff's Notations Review of Application The application involves the filling of approximately 1.8(K) cubic yirds of clean fill and the regrading of altered topographies along the ni>rth side of the residential \oi This site was Zi'iiinii l ilc ^1886 Niwoinbcr 10. 1093 I’aue 1 previously used by the City as an outdoor storage yfsrd. The cuts made into higher elevations along the north side allowed lor the hauling equipment to access roadways developed along the storage area. This type ol land alteration activity could not be covered under the nonnal land alterations allowed under the authori/atiun ot a building permit. The grading plan also includes the land alterations required tor the pieparation of two building sites. Review bu H. all grading activities involved in the preparation of the building sites meet the required 73 :'.nback from the OilWL of the natural environment lake. Note all land alteraii*Mis are 2f>" Iro a the designated wetland shown at the 931 elevation. The drainage ditch that runs tfom the west to the east along the northern portions of the property will not be altered. I he only land alteration involving the drainageway wDuld be the one required by the City involving the removal of a culvert beneath one of the e.xisting gravel drives. Applicant shall also restore area of drive to a grass lawn. No other alterations are required w ithin drainage ditch as there is adequate fall to east. The only other improvement planned by applicant would be to clean the ditch in an attempt to restore grassed areas adjacent to drainage ditch. Review E.xhibits E and F. the engineer's review comments. The amended grading plan. E.vhibit M. has designated the silt fence installation along the grading limits. Culverts are now shown at the driveway entrances and the swale is now shown along the east side ot the road outlot betw'cen the entrance drive. His report of November 4th still asks that existing sewer and two e.xisting force mains be show n on the plan as well as the proposed service locations for the two residences. In addition, we ask that instruc*’.on 6 be added to the general site plan notes asking for tiic removal of the gravel drive and existing culvert at the northwest corner of the property. Staff RecoinmetuJation Ti' apprt)ve the conditional use permit that would allow filling of approximately 1.81X) cubic yards of fill as shown on the grading plans prepared by Bruce W. .Schmitt & Associates dated (kiober 19, 1993. subject to the condition that applicant provide an updated grading plan fulfilling all of the conditions set forth by the City Engineer Such plan to be completed prior to applicatitm being presented to the City C*'uncil Itir tinal review and action. ch : \ 9 ^ 0CITY OF CRCNO - GS:iERAL LAxND USE APPLIi^IOW^ C-4^ .4 ________________________— ____________— *"**’**tj!r?^*"**.rr*"..^ PPOPERT!T LOCATION ff 'W— \0(y<^ OLO cv^srt>^ BAY Rjdad /)r;" Site Address:•■'TT,- -f .•■Cf'on I I Wl WMWMC/ Property Identification Nurtbci* (P.I.D.) Af Z****^*ii'C "iCaTT'-rI Aitmtcu ui I XU4. ♦ * - t''»*"•'W'w w rrij v»A /V^U^lf ^^v«vv r; -A.'i .ViI ^ «. w • wrLTrii;* C l 'CCM Pl«se attach legal descripticn to apclicatict il ^ct on recuired survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Jw. Phone (hone) Phene (work)4'13''2.^68APPLICAN' Masre L. MgUAfAE]^ yi\(i wa-SzATA gptvJP______ City WA7ZATA _Address OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (hone) Nar:e rAT( OP ^P.CK)0 - - - - f^ELAi»\6D UpOi^ ^rry A^>PRCvJAL :ioAddress _ Date Preoertv Acquired Uffat>J C >TV APPfig^/AU;---- (nenth/yea. / I (do) a^so own the adjacent F^'-eis^of^land.______ pees — CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS “ S 50.00 For each variance request with CO? application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest HouseAiuost Apartr.ents $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Ccnnercial/Industrial Use ^ $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetla.nd or flcodplain X. Grading and Si*-h^n*75’ of lakeshcreGrading, seawall, retaining wa^ls wi-n-n /o PRD/PID - see fee schedule s.n.wal r.« - SIOO.CO (no change Sren original application) «Sn*th.-ract F.a - Double Current Application Fa. glTBrgR APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $173.00 I 73.OC $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 -:ther - Cccanercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Sofcdivisi^ Rezoning (PUD " refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTYPresent Zoning District KR ~ 1 £> Present Use of Property CITY STDRK&S Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ^ ^ Describe request in detail: “TO tTE. AkID PgejAiT Co^iSTRUCT!o>^ PgFK aZiA^oI-^ 6fiAD>KJG TD (2.gSTPg£ PeRJ^(T ___ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Aoplication Form. . 2. Certified p'roperty Owners List of owners within 350 (you can ob^ai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Center 348-3271). 3 4 5 Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 6 7 land any other persons you wish notified of this application. you ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKIING COPY (11* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff ; _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - - -- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by t.he Zori.ng Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staf. time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that t.he information supplied is true and correct to th^jn best, o^his/her )cnowpedge. Applicant's signature Date lg/ao/t3 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this authorised reasonable entry onto the property by City sta^^, consultants, agents, commission members, and Counci1 members for purposes of investioation and vorlficati4h.th|Ls requesf.i Owner's signature Date |o/^,/‘f3 AppIicanrmus ”hivV7ll Vubmittals Into th. City offices 25 days before the re___w^^s.'inn Planning Commission Meetings are held on tnePlanning Commissi :?n Meeting. • ----------- ------------ - third Monday of each month. Applicants »tast be P*^«*«nt_at a 11 scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If «n applicant is unable to attend a achedulad meeting^ pleas# maka arrangeinents authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building « a,onxng Office of this change prior to t.he meeting. m « • !«• K '• - w i I*" ^*1 ' ** r« r*^***-.*!--fr-, ■'•J. t»J VU ,-------M -; ■»« ■» 1 1 .. r .. 1 .. 1 jm tL. fOX Z1 iT ( 1 1 1 I •1■1.1 <a m a ■4 7-^J7/; w f • y /^* ^7 V ▼ ^ ^ ^ ^ k ________________^-£1 —'A *«» (S property owners list for the 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road - Orono Sewer Plant 19-117-23 13 0006 ;ilis Kendall 1020 Old Crystal Bay Road South Jayzata, MN 55391 04-117-23 43 0012 Herbert & Erika Kahler 2725 Rainey Road Wayzata, MM 55391 9-117-23 14 0001 :obert Gumnit 100 Old Crystal Bay Road South .0. Box 54 ;rystal Bay, MN 55323 9-117-23 14 0006 homas & Phyllis Colwell 130 Old Crystal Bay Road Sou^n ayzata, MU 55391 3-117-23 14 0004 . Johnston 35 Willow Drive ayzata, M!I 55391 )-117-23 11 0004 }bert & Joan Dayton 165 French Lake Road lyzata, MU 55391 -117-23 21 0006 bert & Joan Dayton 65 French Lake Road yzata, MU 55391 -117-23 12 0004 tro Waste Control 0 Metro Square Bldg . Paul, MN 55101 J-117-23 12 0003 sonard Carpenter >500 Wayzaca Blvd Apt lOe.0 lyzata, MU 55391 J-117-23 12 0002 J Ellis , iO Old Crystal Bay Road South lyzata, MN 55391 3117-23 12 0001 aorge Must 20 Old Crystal Bay Road South ayzata, MU 55391 4-117-23 44 0004 /ndon Stubbs B5 Old Crystal Bay Road South ong Lake, 55356 -117-23 13 0013 ott fc Susan Vickertnan 85 Rainey Road yzata, MU 55391 k_. m Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates - 3 So'^fif'cc '.V 9o\fr^ »»F • jc\ecf^ C ^E Va»"» *' . jC*\4^ 'i »i'‘ » ’ E rf• Pf JC'-^ 9 Cock PE Th(yr»>jl ( \v>^i PP tDCJe*? G <»E SuWr* •.• ECr' n C P ♦ Cor<W tJfH Engineers & Architects October 15. 1993 A PE V"' * Jo'do^ PE Poof'* » PE P .-jrJ A PE J C I - •/• * ^E C ?uuf« A 4 A SOO'CXV’ PE V^ « * ^arw'' Pf V "if P^ofrr^nr p£ >J ■ E«.xJ PE P A»v3^ry>«r» ^ A ?<T'4 .1 C So'rjA'JT ^E '-0-^-ii f A<\;jj Pf Vjrt n^/ PE P Pf Aiy'^« V AiCP ►V p ; P,r# P£ '►•Omji P|pf^rv>n Pf Vf»“jrC PE j T..^ « V4 4r^ PE .p"*. CJ pf V jtt J A'V'^ek PE P A'--pf%or» Pf V^u 9 Pr.'*, P£ V4'k A >,(3 Pg Grf'V A Vty^' Pf . E Pf 4 p. t r Pf ^ Cj^Ae-' p£ V a '* 0 Xj - % Pf 3 PE c Ph -0 G'.t.f P£ L A PE Gp ''* D PC P ToO- PE f ’ K C Pf . Se'v:! PE V^.rx^ D GuttJ^wn P« Cr. ') C PC Pju* G Pf P Go'^ PE C*‘J'*Pi 4 E*:tson ..ro V p=rws^tkv *,! o scr* Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building and Zoning Adniini-stralor City of Orono Post Office Bo.x 66 Cr\'stal Bav. Minne.sota 55323 OCT \ 8 1993 Ke: Melamed Residence File No. 139-Gen Dear Jeanne. We have reviewed the preliminary grading plan submitted for the Robert Melamed residences on Fots I and 2, City of Orono Plat. The grading is acceptable, however, we recommend the following modifications. Silt fence should be installed at the edge of the construction limits prior to the work to protect the wetlands from erosion. Tlic e.xisting sewer and two existing forcem.iins should be shown on the plan as well as the proposed services. Drainage and utility easements should be prepared and shown on the plan as per our letter dated August 1/, 1993. The drainage is shown to flow over the two driveways and entrance drive. This drainage pattern is not recommended and will create problems during treezing weather. We recommend that a swale be constructed along the east side ot the entrance drive with culverts under both driveways. The existing culvert under the entrance drive should be replaced. An existing culvert, to the east of the culvert shown, should be removed and shi'wn on the plan. 1 he existing drainageway between the small wetland and French Lake .should he zrr.dcd. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truL, BONFSTROO. ROSENE. ANDERI.IK & .\SSO( lATFS, INC tS€J~7f Shawn D. Gustafson. P E. / 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul# MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates OfTo G ^3%^'’^ »*E • .k3V4*t:« C Arjef: « *»f I J •'£ ^ Crc* **£ £ %c>*; ®£ ffoCWf! 0 ®£ ki«n M C •Sen4j» C.?<^4otjrf Engineers & Architects November 4, 1993 A GortX?^ Pf i?cc-eft P pf. ‘»f <J J Lcsfcorj 0£ C tuiip« A ' * A SCo'CC^ ^£ vj'i A ‘^*rsOT P£ V<^af ^ f >J A f <P\3 9 A'',J«»«cr. Oonjo c So'T^J'rr. f*e £ Argul ^£ *.*r^>e' 9 ?4u **E A I A i ^ C ** Pn.iO ; <>,ne *»£ r»'vn ‘^S W Apffr.co p£ Vi'-je'C **£ ,jf^» 1? V jatj pf ,e*'v C Uc’l J Argjp#ii Pg ke'''*er*’ '' Pf VA'i » tfO'^ Pf Ma<» a >f£j P£ r»A'\ Jl* Mor^»’ P£ P£ A 8/:k Sc^n-J! p£ P^rff) j CjsA«*'* PE V^'k D Xi s PE V es 3 P£ L P^«<hO 0^.^^ P£ L X p'^n PE Gjr, D *fr.'.fr»<7 PE • V3J ^jsre' P£ AMh 9 *Ayp PE Dou^;;ai j 9enc< p £ ShAfvn D u jv :a'S o'#'» PE CeC'^C vP* **£ P#u» G Hpur« P£ :cnn P Goroe» P£ C^^fps A fcfchton .eo V Pj^'iMv V? Owv' 1/ Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 NOV '8 '19S3 Re: Melamed Residence File No. 139-Gen Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the revised preliniinaiy grading plan submitted for the Robert Melamed residences on Lots 1 and 2, City of Orono Plat. The revisions include sill fence along the grading limits, driveway culverts and a swale along the east side of the entrance drive. The.se revisions are acceptable. However, several items on our previous letter dated October 15. 1993 have not been addressed. These items include showing all existing utilities and culverts and the proposed services and easements on the plan. We have included a copy of the existing utility plans for your reference. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 V^st Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 V w9^560 I • ♦ • • - * % • • * « O i i ■ ’*;'<. ro uf -r "Ik *w • I / A13 2' ’KV ,jy L<‘f V ‘V: *. » !'«,? ■• ■■ ■'. V y:« I '• ; .. -i‘ } •♦. - * »m. * I < •. =wuC . . a I • • a « *'3 5 J ^ *»> u '4; 1 ’ ?1, Wi .vf aI'Vmi r'/ if >B. P m pf^g SV SA11 7JwWf^g»i ‘ wmm - - '*ir^ y ^ - I. > ^ ^jSJT'N V.*5> - ~*V I:‘J ' 'iJili: M*. «VilP(iM • a a .— 4 -a-^ -- '"■"■■yt *<♦ /«ii __ X /-^'*4 V. • It x'v r^' !• *" v*' - ' ''^« ■;-♦ m *4 4 »L •- N % ^ I Sw t 1 ^ 7|* / 4# < 1 :^:y-V/. V'M:t ;:•. -.-•i; ^•^00 \ SLT»a«a. M, ^ ; . , / 'll /y ____ f ' ! , t / >(te' '' i''5<f ; . V ! ■ // /\5<\ / / / * / /. -N «.'j • 4'i i V .I j.*• , ■t, •.:. fy m ‘51^{I<^ |5 i|sE " t* .A * Jf.f.l'J n1 r \p-\ • -Mlilh 1$m > »l5 1 Ji; i ' 1 t ! I f ;t I« i 3 ’ ■Hi:»V '■ ■'■! H i • •' * ,.-.r \* ■ r! ;.; . • . * 'V i'*' •• ' •*’» I' */.** * . 'n ; • • * • :'■■■/ :--v. V'’ . /■ V. " • : ^ * ‘V ,> • 1 '.« i• * I -i •' »■ K • * V• >1 • ■■ •■ ••:'- , .€c •.. •;■• ■■■' ■', ■■■>: ^ ■'. • .■; ■ , :. . i ‘ i ^JLt ; ‘ , • . . * • ' ‘h ••'•' \u ,■• f • r*t* V; * f ;U•V V f .-.■f '.V^. I '•'v'n-, \f..- • »•. : -[ii t '1/ •i (< •■ i'i' . il * ; , ■ f »L • .. J.« ‘ #»t.« ftm lA .-• V- •5 ?ci ‘ C‘ ^ \ * I- I! i:■; 1 m J \u V ?.« I ✓ {n a 'f .:t r I "I 4 t\ • ^ •» f; tr;-\i ' )r n: * X tV..m / •I SVC / fi - A%v! .L- \ ^l|i s . M I V S< 4 ’V-------------------- I •' f .....U-y^ ’ ' A I - JJSCl A‘ \ \\ ^ > m u \ / '■ '' ''i \ . c.. 'c' X / T'iv *~7.♦•••■ ro IU4HM4I I'; \/I } \11h /frv»i : /*‘ r^i^vs f f > [fP) I (iU«) M-'i/ //‘'V^./\s«\ Xi*' / X ^ ('¥ilt - V '' / .t I ; /^iA: >\n*>v«. t.' \\V ‘ ' I / !l f? • i_ %11 / *. "7 To: From: Dale: Subject: OroP" i^lanning Commission Members Mayor Callalian and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator ‘it ^ V.o > \ Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administram|^ ^ *<•>. •c’November 18. 1993 <(^1887 Robert L. Melamed. 1000 Old Crvstal Bav Rv>ad ■ Conditional Use Pennit - Resolution Additional Exhibits Floor Plans Elevations Please review the enclosed staff memo dated November 9. 1993 for more background in the review of this application. The applicant has provided conceptual plans for the development of the second residence on the propeny. E.xhibits I and J. The structure shall meet all required setbacks. The single story walkout proposes no height problem. As already noted in the review of the conditional use permit for the land alterations, the preparation of the building pad will not involve any alteration within the lakeshore protected area nor within the 26 ’ setback from the adjacent drainageway or wetland. As required by code, the guest house will satisfy all lot standards of the RR-IB zoning district, review E.xhibit II. The applicant advised the Plannine Commission that the propeity will be subdivided as soon as possible as the conditional use p».*n.iit for the guest house was a means for the City to legally issue a building permit for the second residence on the 44- acre parcel. Pluiinicig Commission Keconimendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the conditional use pennit for a guest house subject to the condition that if the subdivision of this property is never finalized that while property contains a second residential unit, this unit must never be used for rental purposes but must remain for the exclusive use of applicant, family members, guests or hired help. The enclosed resolution has been drafted for Council ’s review and action. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER ML7SICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) FILE NO. 1887 WHEREAS, Robert L. Melamed (hereinafter the "applicant”) is the owner ot the property located at 1(XX) Old Crystal Bay Road South within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City”) and legally described as: Lot 1. Block 1, French Lake at Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinalier "the property"'); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono tor a conditional use pennit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10 28, Subdivision 3 (A) to permit construction of a guest house on the 4.4 acre property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1887. 2. 3. 4. The property is l»x:ated in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District requiring two acres in area. The property is approximately 4.4 acres in area. ITie Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 15. 1993 and recommended approval of the conditional use permit for the filling of approximaielv 1800 cubic yards of fill based on the following findings: a. The property consists of 4.4 acres. There is adequate area to meet area and setback standards for a second residential unit. Page 1 of 4 c. d. The property will be served with sewer. The proposed second residential unit w'ill meet all required setbacks and will be located at a minimum of 60* from the principal structure on the property. A sulxlivision of this property can be realized with each lot meeting all required lot standards of the RR-IB zoning district. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a guest house u.se of the property will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a tire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property' will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Cede and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONOXSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use pennit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (A) to permit a euest house on the property located at 1000 Old Crystal Bay road, subject to the following cotKiilions: 1 During the period that structure remains as guest house, the rcsidciKc must never be used for rental purposes but must remain for the c.tclusivc use of applicant, family members, guests or hired help. Auihoiities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but arc permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within oik year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that dale (November 22. 1994). Page 2 of 4 VioLuion of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this n day of November. 1993 ATI'EST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE or MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November. 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said insimmcni was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this dav of , 199__. before me a Notary' Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person!s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this dav of , 199___. before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, anti acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 r TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. Cilv Administratorm Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator November 9. 1993 SUBJECT: //1887 Robert L. Melamed. 1000 Old Cr>stal Bay Road South - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearins Ordinance Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (A) - Conditional use permit required for guest house Required area = 4 acres Total lot area = 4.4 acres (192.270 s.f.) Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A-2) - Properties served by sewer may receive credit for wetland and drainageway areas List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List/Certificate of Mailing D - Grading Plan E - Hardcover Fact Sheets for Combined Propeny F - Hardcover Fact Sheets for Future Northern Lot G - Hardcover Facts for Fumre Southern Lot H Proposed Division Review of Application Applicant is the current owner of Lot 1. Block 1. French Creek at Orono, the residential lot created with the recent subdivision of the City. A building permit has already been issued for applicant’s principal residence located on the south side of the property, review Exhibits D and H. Applicant now seeks approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of his mother’s residence on the northern portion of the propeny. It has always been the intention of the applicant to subdivide the 4+ acre parcel but because of time constraints and the need to start construction, applicant has applied for the conditional use permit to allow the second residence to be constructed. As required by code, the guest house must meet all lot standards of the RR-IB Zoning District (Review Exhibit H). Note the 30’ side setback has been met and the 150’ sinictural setback from the ordinary high water level of the sewage lagoon and the southern basin of French Lake. The northern lot (the guest house lot) will contain 2.1 acres. The southern lot to be retained by applicant contains 2.29 acres. Zoning File ffiSlS November 9, 1993 Page 2 Hardcover facts have been provided by applicant recording property in its combined state and at the time of a future subdivision. Hardcover facts are reviewed as follows: A. Combined property: 0-75’ setback area = 51.550 s.f. Allowed = 0 Proposed = 0 75-250’ setback area = 112.150 s.f. Allowed = 25% Proposed = 16.508 s.f. or 14.72% 250-500’ setback area = 28.570 s.f. Allowed = 30% Proposed = 7.490 s.f. or 26.22% B. Northern lot: 0-75’ setback area = 25.200 s.f. Proposed = 0 75-250’ setback area = 63.400 s.f. Allowed = 25% Proposed = 7.385 s.f. or 11.65% 250-500’ setback area = 3.820 s.f. Allowed = 30% Proposed = 600 s.f. or 15.7% C. Southern lot: 0-75’ setback area = 26.350 s f. Proposed « 0 75-250’ setback area = 48.750 s.f. Allowed * 25% Proposed • 9.123 s.f. or 18.7% 250-500’ setback area = 24.750 s.f. Allowed = 30% Proposed * 6.890 s.f. or 27.84% Access to the property is gained via the private driveway that currently serves the MWee facility and the hmire park site. As a condition of the final subdivision approval, the Zoning File /i^l878 November 9, 1993 Page 3 City was required to grant a nonexclusive access easement to applicant that will also serve the owner of the guest house and/or future northern lot. Floor plans and elevations have not been provided with the current CUP application but applicant has advised that they will be available at the public hearing at the Monday night meeting. Staff will have an opportunitv ’ to review the elevations and floor plans prior to the meeting in order to determine if there are any problems. Staff looks for no problems as the structure will be a single stor>' walkout. Staff Recommendation To approve Application fflSSl granting a conditional use permit to Robert L. Melamed to allow the construction of a guest house on the property located at 1000 Old Ciystal Bay Road South finding that all lot standards of the RR-IB Zoning District have been satisfied in review of this application. Although it is understood that a subdivision of this property will soon be realized, in the event the subdivision is not finalized, that while property contains a second residential unit, this unit must never be used for rental purposes but must remain for the exclusive use of applicant, his family members, guests or hired help. ch 'city'OP OROMO - GEMERAL LARD USE APPLIO^^ PROPERTY LOCATION // Site Address oc^o CLP c^-iS.TAL &AY Road rJTV nz rOnXjr, UA I I W'f U'«\UffU r^zuTTCwi I Property Identification Nimber (P.I.D.) 1 A V/ V VVV oi rLtJ V A ifL.11 'ecri' L. I li^A 7? I i. f “ f*i < V» A I vv Please attach legal description cn required survey. ^ I iV^M I fc- * V' •to acDlicaticn if not incluceqrrrjpT_7;u4,y^- yr^ jS7d40 COOl aoi TUJ- W/ €m APPLICANT Name RofeSgT L. l^eLAAtg) Phone (hcne) 4ni~~T1l2 Phone fwcrk) 4T^-C2>^B8 e>LViX)_____ City WAY zA tM Phcne (hcne)______________—--------- Address ____ OWNER (if different than applicant) ^ITY CP C?>Dh^O C?fi£^€KT^ PheneMa.me Address Ci ty Zio Date ProDertv Acquired i/Po./ C‘rY T (do) iSon^ also own tne adjacent pareexs o£ land. (aicnth/year ) _________ t-wtUXi-cta —____________ I (do) (<^o fees - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP applicaticn $125.00 Residential accessory tse $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 ^uest Hous^Guest Apartr.en _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Ccrmnercial/Industrial Dse $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain — ^Llinl"sLwL“'"r\t‘ain/ng"wail^ wfthin of laReshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - SIOO.OO (no change from original application) A?2e"the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Other - Conunercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation l''^®^°Su'e)Rezening (PUD " refer to fee sc.hedu.e) Comprehensive Plan Amendneat Appeals see fee sche<3'^i® L. i. j. uox- Or i jlPresent Zoning District Present Use of Property CiTf Residential Ocher (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST ^ ^ Describe recuest in detail: TO ALLOW PlAM OF <^uESrr HouS^ c<0 _______________ 3 4 5 6 7 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Comoleted Aoplicaticn Force. • 2. Certified Prooertv Owners List of owners within 350 (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Depart.-nent of Finance A-603 Governmer. Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). . Topographic survey (e.xisting and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attacn a separate list ot any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11" X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. _________ Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff;_____________________________________Date_______________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies t.hat the information supplied is true and correct to th^ best, o^his/her )cnow/t^dge. Applicant’s signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorised reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultanus, agents, commission members, and Counci1 members for purposes ot investigation and request. Owner's signature _____~~ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before t.he Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on t.te third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Corrjnission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Property owners list for the 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road - Orono Sewer Plant 09-117-23 13 0006 Ellis Kendall 1020 Old Crystal Bay Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 04-117-23 43 0012 Herbert & Erika Kahler 2725 Rainey Road Wayzata, MM 55391 09-117-23 14 0001 Robert Gumnit 1100 Old Crystal Bay Road South P.O. Box 54 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 09-117-23 14 0006 Thomas & Phyllis Colwell 1130 Old Crystal Bay Road South Wayzata, MM 55391 39-117-23 14 0004 3. Johnston J35 Willow Drive 4ayzata, MN 55391 19-117-23 11 0004 lobert & Joan Dayton 1465 French Lake Road fayzata, MN 55391 9-117-23 21 0006 .obert 4 Joan Dayton 465 French Lake Road 'ayzata, MN 55391 9-117-23 12 0004 etro Waste Control 50 Metro Square Bldg t. Paul, MN 55101 9-117-23 12 0003 aonard Carpenter 5500 Wayzata Blvd Apt 1020 ayzata, MN 55351 J-117-23 12 0002 J Ellis 10 Old Crystal Bay Road Sout.- lyzata, MN 55391 >117-23 12 0001 ►orge Hust 10 Old Crystal Bay Road South lyzata, MN 55391 -117-23 44 0004 ndon Stubbs 5 Old Crystal Bay Road South ng Lake, MN 55356 -117-23 13 0013 ott 4 Susan Vickerznan 85 Rainey Road yzata. Mil 55391 A\ /o CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Bosma of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1887, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have her*mnto set my hand and seal this 29th day of October, 1993. Jamie tosma - / LX ii f -i; f • « '•A^ H Q O ^TS HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone S.F JL<i ..4^:: SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE OME) (t Existing Hardcover in Zone 73-250' 250-500' • 500-1000' • • A . ■ House ‘ x • ' S.F. •LENGTH • X width • 8 S.F. JJ X .• • S.F.jU m •• X m S.F. X o , S.F. B. • • GaRAGc X •• • • • S.F. • C. • Driveway x S.F. X # t S.F. 0.SlGEWALK ‘. . . X IBM 1 S.F. _ X _.S.F. X .S.F. • E.Jatio/Deck X •m .S.F. j * m P.IANDSCAPE ^ X •S.F. AREAS UNOERLAtN BV . X m S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING , X • • S.F. X S.F. t.r E E 5C 100 ■ i^yj.p. r 44- » i • « f t • * ...... S/rA___ •» . a«Meff>J€o ^ V-:i. ' ■ ■ • • HARDCOVER CALCULATION HORKSHOT _ SETBACK lOME: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ^l-25W 250-500' 500-1000 i >-Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ■ House - -t ^3BZ -S.P. • • LENGTH . WIDTH s 1 •t .•• • _’S.F. •• •• • • •• X • • • S.F. • 1 • . t . • • . X * • S.F. • 1 •• • • X » S.F. * • • R. Garage X • « S.F. r. hpfvewAY 37-^ -f- ' 9 ■ * * . 6ZZO • 1 S.P. % • %X m • • sIp. • • •'ze>^ ^ luo D. Sidewalk ■-ir S.F. • .X ” .. - -m S.F. , ■' • X S.F. E. >TIO/ D eck iBo ^<^S^... 3^^5'S.F* s. Landscaps m X tm .. S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN RV X ♦ m 3,F, PLASTIC SHEETING • • X ------m • S.F. X .. S.F. n HruPD X m ho • • Total Hardcover in Zone 1 • Total Property A rea in Zone /A&>e, fJZ?£0 S.F. S.F. \ « ^ .i Q] _ 4 [J] %100 . /41Z A E % \h'' C * tr#• • • ' « • 1 I J L MEET f • • SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone "aso-s^oO 500-1000' A. ' House LENGTH B. Garage - c. Triveway D. Sidewalk •• •I •E. Patio/- Deck F,Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY t . PLASTIC SHEETING ^<-41 G. Other - X X V* ' V •S i Ft WIDTH S.F. S.F. - S.F S.F. S.F S.F S.F. S.F S.F. S.F S.F S.F. S.F. • ^.F. S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone ________ S.F 74^c> ... TOTAU P.OPERTY AatA tM ZOMS .• 1... |T1 • • • I m B 2S^7b"% 100 • /o J HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET^.3 / . 1^0 ^ .V7' ! Ma rH) /af e. SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Existing Hardcover in Zone A, ■ House ______* B. Garage c. Driveway LENGTH ^ X WIDTH X _ D. Sidewalk _ 2S0-S00'500-1000' • a S.F. • - • S.F. •/TT ..0-.* . • • . ■-------Sft.Pf -________________S.F. 1 / -S.F. • a •' ’S.'F.•. • m , S.F. • t i.F, m S.F.• • * S.F E. Patio / * Deck S.F. S.F. F. Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING S.F. S.F. S.F S.F G. Other /*. • > Total Hardcovir IM Zone - Total Property Area in Zone • * n X 100 S.F. •.F. A .r ^ s S.F« • 53 % ^ • ym A’ %• L f 5’/rs VER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Existing Hardcover in Zone 0-75'250-500' 500-1000' • • A . ■ House ,•a S.F. • LENGTH WIDTH ■ •t • 1 a s*:p. • •• • • • . • * • • •y • • • S.P. • * • ••y • 1 S.F. ^ ,1 •#• • • y a S.F. B.Garage _ ♦ • * « • ;y • * • S.F. C.Driveway • * y ” -a '37_0^d[ S.P. # • y t • • S.F. D.. • Sidewalk • X •S.F. • X m • # 1 t S.F. .. X S.P. E.?ATI0/_„Deck • f . R X • • • 550 S.F. p.Landscape • •; X • • • S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY • •# X • •%• S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING • • X • • • • S.P. •• X m • • S.P.• G. Other X m <• S.F.r*•0R • ) Total Hakocoviji in Zons - ^ •'j* * '■ • I • , . Total Property Area ih Zone - - i>34^a % 100 za&g ,$ i.p ^34^0 I.p, ^-73&S ’ 4 B //»6^ A m 0-- ■* • X • • . . ;0 'f> -a HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET § ! Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ' House B. Garage c. Driveway V*• I LENGTH WIDTH D.. Sidewalk _X*. '■ ■■ 250-500^ 500-1000' S.F. V \ / .•i * S.F.>*> s.fV i 1 •: • . S.F. » « ; ofcsj S.F. • S.F.• •^<5 s!..' • • * •« « s.p. • S.F. • m » - ■ i .t >••• E. Patio/ . Deck ■• •-t p.Landscape . areas underlain BY . 1 PLASTIC SHEETING . . , I % %m • ' . » •• V ■ . - * *♦* G. Other Jif, X #» ^ . • %*» ¥ •• Total HARocovtii in Zoni .. Total Property Area in Zone X 100 «•»»r xai .. V ■ A ' V S.F. . • • s. p; S.F. S.F.' S.F. S.F. • •• • • S.P.' « S.F. t. .. C3 .... I BI • • , # 1 13:1^ ^• # HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET Existing Hardcover in Zone :^)9 A. ' House [ ! B. Garage c. Driveway E. Patio/ Deck p.Landscape areas underlain BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other length D. Sidewalk _ WIDTH r Total Kardcgviji in Zone «■ ^. * Total Property Area in Zone 500-1000' • « A •-•. # S.F.0 • S.F. ^ v^y S.F, « S.F. S.F. € • S.F. .' S.F. • t 0 A , • * • sip.# • • • S.Fi S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F • t S.F S.F. S.F. I.F ■at5^<3 .... ITI 0 £;__-QO X IQO - ___0_% • V V ii* I 1. B'SJa Q HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75" ^^250^ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ' House LENGTH B. Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk _ El Eatio/DECK X F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . RUSTIC SHEETING •* iZ3 G. OTHEA . X X WIDTH X _ Jo ’ Total Hardcover in Zone * • Total Property Area in Zone '^sez ,, S.F. • • s.f; . S.F, S.F. ■S.T..1 S.F. f €ZO S.F, S.F. ZCo S.F. ' S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.Fi S.F. 24 6<y ^ S.F. ^ S.F. _ I.F, ^hi5o a.p. m pf| ’ 4 rn X 100 • /^>7/ - % A* •• Im I irardcoVer^xu SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Existing H ardcover in Zone S/TiB WORKSHEET 0-75' 75-250' ' 500-10CO' A . ■ House •0 X - • 2/^S.F. • LENGTH width ■- • • •« 1 f • X m *S.Fi • •• • • » X • •• • S.F. • » • X ^ • • S.F.•.V,. '■ » , • #• ••X a S.F. B. • * Garage . • ' 'V • : X • S.F. C.D riveway XV • -S.F. • • X ^ • •" * ^ • • S.F. 0. • Sidewalk 'X • S.F. • • « •• . • • • ^ ^ %• 1 X " % %m S.F.• • •.r • > • f . , % 0 X #1 S.F. E. % ?ATio/j:ij^.: )£CK ^ ^ # # ^ •X % r . * ■i . \ S.F.• V F.Landscape ^ • • • • . ‘ • ■ ft’-• ■ * , % • X • S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . ____ * '* A ' •• • X • • t , S.F.* PLASTIC SHEETING * .* X • $ • S.F. •%X . S.F.• fi. Other • •> • . • r • X «• S.F. - H - . .•# ft Total KAitocovtA in Zoni Total Property Area im Zone I • .... fTl ^ • A g ] X 100 " Z.7»S^ _ i.. - %• ♦i •• A* ' J s'y * • /j'l..___u • » . !>>___■■»! V~:» •■'iSm ■%>•[.';: u •s % // / I I m I I s ¥ \ < r V I \ 'J II 1 I. U / L \ 'hIn \ I. -- r •1 --•q- I I U. i; I' \i /' . * •.» it: i --- ^____ __1 J T 1 I . -r* i » ; 1 1 • i i 0- (a 0^ ■;1. r- •V?' 1:- ! •r * II II •> \i f;- A 5^ 6- C3^ . r* To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers m Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator w. / Ca From: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator ■ ■ '<>. November 17. 1993 % Subject:/1^1888 Paul and VeNita Schnebele. 835 Forest Arms Lane - Variance - Resolution Please review the attached staff memo ot November 5. 1993 tor background in the review of this application. Applicant seeks approval of an average lakeshore setback variance for an addition to the lakeside of the existing residence. An existing three-season porch is located 18* in front of the average setback line. The proposed addition will be 20*. All improvements are located within the 75-250* setback zone where hardcover is proposed at 13%. There is an excess of 8% hardcover within the 250-500 ’ setback area where no changes or improvements are proposed. Proposed total hardcover tor the property is at 15.5%. Structural coverage will be at 6.4%. It was noted that the majority of hardcover was located further away from the lake. Applicant did note that as they proceed with landscape improvements on the property that underlying plastic is being removed. It is their intention to completely remove plastic underliners within the next year as they complete their landscaping improvements. In fact, applicant had advised that certain areas within the 250-500 ’ setback area had already been altered. Hardcover facts did not reflect this. Planning Commission members did not make the removal of the plastic underliner a condition of variance approval but preferred that this be included as a Pnding. With plastic underliner removals, hardcover would be adjusted as follows: 75-250 ’ setback area = 25.025 s.f. Allowed = 6.256 s.f. or 25% Existing = 3.023 s.f. or 12% Proposed = 2.373 s.f. or 9.4% 250-500 ’ setback area = 10.069 s.f. Allowed = 3.021 s.f. or 30% Existing = 3.827.9 s.f. or 38% Proposed = 2.464 s.f. or 24.4% Planning Conunission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the average lakeshore setback variance subject to the findings and conditions set fonh in the enclosed approval resolution. / A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION I (B) FILE NO. 1888 WHEREAS, Paul and VeNita Schnebele (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 835 Forest Arms Lane within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Lot 4. Block 3. Forpit Arms. Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied 'o the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 (B) to permit construction of an addition to the west and lakeside of the existing residence that will be placed 20’ in froiit of the average lakeshore setback line where an existing structure is located 18* in front of the setback line and where no such encroachment is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed ar Zoning File #1888. The propert>' is liKaied in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 45,819 s f. or 1.05 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 15. 1993 and reconunended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following hardships and unique findings: A. The majority o ‘ the house and other improvements are located within the 250-500 ’ setback area resulting in an excess of 8% hardcover. This pattern of development is consistent with the residential lots on the channel side of Forest Arms Lane where homes are placed closer to ite road taking advantage of the higher more graduated elevations. Page I of 5 B. Total hardcover on the property with the proposed improvements would be at 15.5%. C. The improvements to the structure are located completelj within the 75* 250’ setback area where only 12% e.xists and 13% is proposed. D. The City has received no comment from the adjacent neighbors receiving the most impact from the addition. E. The single story addition will have no more of a visual impact on the adjacent residences than the existing single story three-season porch. F. The improvement will meet all other required setbacks. G. Total structural coverage is proposed at 6.4% where the code would allow lo%. H. Applicant proposes replantings of defined landscaped areas that are currently lined with plastic. Applicant proposes the removal of plastic as landscape improvements are installed. Upon completion of the landscape improvements, hardcover will be amended as follows: 75-250’ setback area = 25,<^25 s.f. Existing = 3,023 s.f. or 12% Proposed = 2,373 s.f. or 9.4% (removal of 914 s.f. of plastic underliner) 250-500’ setback area = 10.069 s.f. Existing = 3,827.9 s.f. or 38% Proposed = 2,464 s.f. or 24.4% (removal of 1,364 s.f. of plastic underliner) The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fu’e hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely Page 2 of 5 serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessar>’ to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessar\’ to preserve a substantial property richt of the applicant; and would be in keeping v.'ith the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B; to permit the construction of an addition to the west and lakeside of the existing residence to be placed 20* in front of the average lakeshore setback line, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 22, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this restilution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of November. 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayor Pfoperty Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November. 1993 by Edward J. Callahan. Jr and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Pace 4 of 5 J STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of . 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 5 of 5 L ^ - To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator November 5, 1993 /!^1888 Paul and VeNita Schnebele. 835 Forest Arms Lane - Variance Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision I (B) - Average lakeshore setback variance required for lakeside addition to existing residence. Allowed = 0’ Existing = 18’ Proposed = 20 ’ Review of hardcover 0-75’ setback area = 10,725 s.f. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing = 32. s.f. 75-250’ setback area = 25,025 s.f. Allowed = 6,256 s.f. or 25% Existing = 3,023 s.f. or 12% Proposed = 3,287.2 s.f. or 13% 250-500 ’ setback area = 10,069 s.f. Allowed * 3,021 s.f. or 30% Existing = 3,827.9 s.f. or 38% No improvements proposed. No changes proposed. Total hardcover Lot area = 45.819 s.f. Existing hardcover = 6.883 s.f. or 15% Proposed hardcover = 7.147 s.f. or 15.5% 3. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage Allowed = 6,873 s.f. or 15% Existing - 2,675 s.f. or 5% Proposed * 2,939.25 s.f. or 6.4% No variance required. Zoning File <^1888 November 5.1993 Page 2 List of Exhibits A B C D E r G H Application Applicants' Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map Aerial Map Elevations Floor Plan Survey Description of Request Applicant proposes the removal of a 14 ’ x 14.3' three-season porch and replacement with a family room/office addition to the lakeside and west side of existing res.dence, refer to Exhibit H. The improvement will require an average lakeshore setback variance. The existing duw- season porch is located 18' in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The proposed addition will extend 20’. As applicants' addendum notes. Exhibit B. the seven year old principal strucmre (built 9/86) was installed in front of the average lakeshore setback line without the necessary variance approval. Seven years ago the channel was probably not considered pan of the main lake for determination of average lakeshore setback line. Members with longer tenure may remember recent variance applications dealing with additions to principal structure, along Forest Arm channel that required average lakeshore setback variances. It has also been noted by Council that the intent or application of this code is not clear when dealing with lots on channels or lots adjacent to lakeshore lots with narrow platted corridors to lake. There is 8% excessive hardcover within the 250-5(X)’ setback area, very consistent with the development along Forest Arms Lane where homes are placed close to the road taking advantage of the higher elevations. Total lot hardcover with the improvement is at 15.5%. The improvements to the situcture are located completely within the 75-250 setback area where only 12% exists and 13% is proposed. The City has received no comment from the adjacent neighbors receiving the most impact from the addition, fhe single story addition will have no more ot a visual impact on the adiaceni residences than the existing single story three-season porch The improvement will meet all other required setbacks l^ues for Consideration 1 Based on the factual ^ndl^g^ noted above, is it necessary that applicant remove excesses of hardcover within the 250-500 ’ setback area (807 s.f.)? IL Zoning File #1888 November 5.1993 Page 3 2.Was the intent of the average lakeshore setback code to consider view impact on lots developed along auxiliary channels of main lake? Hardship Statement Please refer to Exhibit B. Staff would add the following hardship Location of house on lot. Existing pattern of development along Forest Arms Lane where houses are constructed closer to roadway taking advantage of the higher elevations. Houses in this area are located on a channel and not on the main lake. // t: w CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIO^f g Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) o o oV*. - rTT¥ f*fw* UA t I U'l Wl(w'»«U nrzrrr , .... i/» I 4WI. i t » I V •r')f 1/VI A V WW /'»♦ rrv MV a 1^41 a f ^ • V V f ijCt k '♦ f QC f*C7DT^TuAjigk‘ n^li I ? 4. a I # # finil I \ f ^ Q TC' f '1 “of'i f < r.** T . •fT«;.ui.^av uvw'A ava rvi*a f •» •^•/c PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address n- Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.)____________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired _______________(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ____residential ____other (specif y) Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . APPLICANT Phone (heme) Name ^ • ■' - ‘Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: OWNER (if different than Name ®hcne (home) Address DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST 07-117-23 12 0012 P £ SCHNcatLt V SCHNEoELc 335 FOREST ARMS LA ^4CUND HN 55364 Phone (work) y:Zip: Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED r -*^ A Setha«.a. I Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Front Side Rear / /Average La)seshore Other (apeclfy) HARDSBIP/DESdUPTIOK OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property COfMiitiona preventing cof^liance with Zoning Code requiregentst (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 8. Completed Application Form _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3, _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4, _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8>i"xll" for reproduction). 5, _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8>5"xll''). 6, _S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7, _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infomation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses i.jcurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of t!>is request. Owner's Signature 7 Ji/'Date //" • Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review eeetings of the Planning CcBSsissicMi and Council* If an applicant Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. L Ptful Mfid VciN4ta Schnvbdo Fove«l Jkww»% Lane Orono* IVIN <6f J> 472*4044 wm V •f 7 JT ’» ^1 :) W 1-. / ^ • ^ October 20, 1993 ' \ • / Ladies and Gentlemen Orono Zoning Commission 1335 Brown Road South Orono, MN 55364 RE: Request for inclusion oil City Council Agenda of 11/22/93 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: Thank you for approving our lequest for a zoning variance We were surprised that this was required Since our home is less than six years old. we expected that a variance would have been requested and approved prior to original construction (we did not build the home). Apparently, the owner/builder managed to get around the variance requirement. The delay caused by this recent development has created some difficulty for us We planned that the construction would have begun late in September; completion was anticipated before the end of December In addition to disrupting the holidays, the delay is causing problems with the financing, especially with the fluctuating interest rates We would be extremely grateful if the remainder of the process could happen as quickly as possible We respectfully request that our request be put on the City Council agenda for November 22. 1993. This will enable us to lay the foundation before the start of winter, and finalize the financing Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, RUN bkXt lD/15/n BATCH 002PROP ADDR OltICR TAXPAYER NAItC/AODR o)\56 07-117-25 12 000^ooaoo roRTST arks laR H BOftITHA I J R BOftItMA ROBERT H A JANIS R BOItlEKA 800 rOREST ARMS LA HOUTiO MT4 SS564 Mtrt4CPIN COltITY PROPERTY INfORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OltlERS LIST38 07-117-23 12 000500850 rOREST ARMS LA T K SAMUEL A A SAMUEL T K A A SAMUEL 850 rORCST ARMS LAJIE HOUMO It4 5S56<i REPORT NO. PIA35401 PAGE 558 07-117-23 12 000600860 FOREST ARMS LA ROYETTA I MARCOTTE ROYETTA I MARCOTTE-SNOM 860 FOREST ARMS LA MOUND MN ■J•V)V PRW AOOR OFtlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 07-117-23 12 0009 00805 FOREST ARMS LA G B BORRON AHA VOLPE GEORGE BORKON/MARILYM VOLPE 005 FOREST ARMS LA ORONO rt4 5S56A 30 07-117-23 12 0010 00015 FOREST ARMS LA M A H HC ELLIGOTT MICHAEL A MARY MC ELLIGOTT 815 FOREST ARfIS LA FtOUF40 Ml 5556A 38 07-117-23 12 0011 00825 FOREST ARMS LA N 0 PARKS A K L PARKS MATTMFH 0 A KAREN L PARKS 825 FOREST ARMS LA MOUND rtl 55566 I PROP ADDR OFAIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 12 0012 00835 FOREST ARMS LA P E SCIRIFBFIE A V SCHflEBELE P E SCHflEBELE A V SCHMLDLLE 835 FOREST ARftS LA MOUND HN 55366 38 07-117-23 12 0013 00055 FOREST ARMS LA C A C CARLSOfI C A CHARLFEN CARLSON 655 FOREST ARMS LANE MOUND Ml 55566 38 07-117-23 12 0016 00075 FOREST ARMS LA DARLOH T MADGE DARLOH MADGE 875 FOREST ARMS LA MOUMO Ml 55566 f. PftOP AOOR OltICR MAIK TAXPAYER INAIC/ADOII TOTAl BATCH 002 00009 I ¥ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INfORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THL RECOPOS OF THE HFMIFPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. / / DATE f \ # 1 t I f • /i «{ICITY OP OPON3HUILDINO PLAH RBVIHW IN9l*ECfoK , ■^■^ .»«TE _________________prnr.m Nd. \ A AppRo\(.i> .V-' sunMirnr MH ROVTO \M1H rOUn; CTK)N3 AS NOTED NOi AIT'KOVM' — C'MiUllCl 8. RESUBMIT it,* t t . itl'. .Mft «•'< VMH AH *h*>l t>* dorj if> lol wllh .ill PpihN «Wt tu«<1lnH * *>»ihn •od# uliaen '’•'•"•i rto* ^^cilicaily noted m tw« r Kf UM THIS PLAN SET ON SITE AT ALL TIMES, TVf! A*l .‘ir»oJ PROVIDE SMOKE DE I IiCI ORS rOR ENTIRE BUILDING Lipia e»f i^uLt. I 7 H«Akf! MN. WOOD 10,EABTH.Sf MHMroNie::I Pf r?*",r>- r- -!M mmm ■ • ^'r St. Hi HoiMilNSDALE. Mn^ 1W22 >r l^mb Plsl. Mil-te -.5*• j -. * • •- ■M‘- ;f^ 4,.1*^ . f*V ► •■T7 H * • »». *• ' ^ ' « i:>t y\'>V :• •. I VM f > V*.•• ■•.l-t:• •» i ’* *•«» 'V vV.;t'#- ;^i-‘ " '' ‘^OVT'LOT . I • « *” ' f .,•• • • • * If ^l^^*'** §■ k ^ V 1 . . • * . # I4k% ‘ 'V ••'. V 1 '4U,.i' ‘JIV iV \0) :»^;i^ Vr.v mi ». tU' .1 — _ ;iX »AV r p A r»# 4^\ P: It1-4 ■:» :#l \r /Aii 1*^?r;'-'Av ^ r'-(‘ov ■■ - -^ 4V • . 'M0'r / .’4 U I' 0?;s^'7 t >y -»^'V •*j>- 'Uj. <T' • ^ . » <'h, * ' » •V i*//r 1 V L> ■'•V V :4 t: r4 V 4 <^7 W.'X:h r4?> .^t • Ir 4m !Cri‘ ■ V ,t V? . '7/ < 4> ' ' 1 ^6^ A, i:^.:i,.>: '- ;.i3B4LA *• i \MV ^■‘ -S’ iVi, * ^ ' ’<<..> . /tsiJ I l#>t;iT •M:m hm mi: t££ I '• V jyCi'y*'■ w'*s?»‘ •'''■•>’■ ' ’>;*^-.'.*‘i! -V' V w ‘iitf &l • »»%. -^•7. \ ^ .. I *;: ‘\ i I ' #i ' r»_ ^ H ♦„ V,.t4»^ . 'X» r 9* »h A s: -s. 4 >e V p V... 1 iv' , ' V.',. >1 V ' / ' »• Ir COVT 'LOT .,1. if ‘ I ■ l^T. ■ ■ ■* \-*v • / ' ’'vy .,V-‘ “^L* ■*'"\ ■ ■ ^v. • n.' TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, Cilv Administrator % Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administraij^ November 18, 1993 '' %>SUBJECT: "Flag Lot ’Ordinance ^ FROM: DATE: Attached is a proposed ordinance regarding flat lots (or "back lots") per the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The ordinance adds a definition of "back lot" to both the zoning and subdivision codes. That definition incorporates and defines the terms "fiag lot" and "easement back lot" for clarification. A portion of the standards appear in both the zoning and subdivision ccxles. This redundancy is intended to assist future users of the code. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. draft. Moved by . seconded by . 2nd Series, per the attached . to adopt Ordinance No. 2nd Series, An Ordinance to Amend the Municipal Zoning Code and Subdivision Code by Defining Standards for the Creation and Use of Lots Which Do Not Abut a Ihiblic or Private Road.______ayes, ______nays. / ORDINANCE NO.. SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE TO ,\.MEND THE MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE AND SUBDIVISION CODE BY DEFINING STANDARDS FOR THE CREATION AND USE OF LOTS WHICH DO NOT ABUT A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF OKJNO ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.02 and Municipal Subdivision Code Section 11.03. Subdivision 2 are each hereby amended by adding the following definition: "Lot-Back " - A lot typically separated from a public oi private road by another lot and which gains access to the public or private road via a narrow corridor typically 10’ to 50 ’ in width, which corridor is platted as an ouilot. A back lot is considered to be a "flag lot” when said corridor is platted as part of the back lot rather than as an outlot. When said corridor is merely an easement over another lot. the back lot is considered to be an "casement back lot". SECTION 2. Municipal Zoning Cixle Section 10.03 is amended by adding Subdivision 27 which shall read as follows: Subd. 27. Special Standards for Back Lots Created After January I, 1994 Back lots as defined in this section which were created as part of a subdivision that received preliminary subdivision approval after Januar>' 1. 1994 are .ubject to the following special requirements in addition to the standards required in Section 11.31, Subdivision 5 of the Orono Subdivision Code: A. Dimensional standards for back lots shall be as tollows: 1. Lot area shall be 150% of the zoning district requirement. 2. Lot width measured parallel to the street at the rear of the street yard of a lakeshorc back lot. or at the rear of the front yard of a nonlakeshore back lot. shall meet the zoning district width requirement The street yard or front yard for any back lot will be a yard starting at the point where the narrow access outlot corridor ends and the creditable lot area begins. Likeshore back lots shall meet the lot widths standard at the shoreline, at the lakeshorc setback, and at the rear of the street yard. 3. The depth of the required street yard or front yard shall be 150% of the zoning district front yard requirement. 4. The side yard and rear yard depths for back lots shall be 150% of the zoning district yard requirement' The lakeshore yard of a lakeshore back lot shall meet the zoning district lakeshore yard requirements. Dimensional standards for front lots. A front lot created as part of a front/back lot division shall meet all zoning district area, width and setback standards, except that the side yard of the front lot adjacent to the access outlot shall be equivalent to the side street yard requirement for that zoning district. C. Access requirements. 1. 3. 4. 5. Access outlots shall be 30 ’ minimum width, and shall be wide enough to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening witliout encroaching on neighboring properties. In approving front/back lot divisions, the City may require that both front lot and back lot share a driveway access within the access outlot if Council determines that creating an additional access to the existing street will be a potential s.ifety hazard. Driveways and parking areas within a back lot shal be located at least 10 ’ from the side or rear lot lines of adjacent lots. No more than two residciKcs may be served by a driveway located within an access outlet. No access outlet may be platted abuning an adjacent access outlot except when the intent is to combine the two access outlots for creation of a public or private road meeting City standards. Screening requirements. 1 Drivewavs constructed in access outlets shall be adequately screened by fencing or vegetation a*- the discretion of the City, at all points to the rear of tiw required street yard of the front Urt, so as to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights into the side or rear yard of adjaceut !ot.s I'he street yard of the back lot shall be adequately screened by fencing or vegetation at the discretion of the City, so as to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights into the side or rear yards of adjacent lots. ll Standards for accessory structures. Accessory structures shall adhere to all requirements of the zoning code, with the following additional requirements; 1. Accessory structures within a back lot shall be allowed no closer than 10 ’ to a neighboring propeny ’s side or rear yard. 2.Accessory structures shall not be allowed within the required street yard of a back lot nor within the required rear yard of a front lot which abuts the street yard of a back lot. 3. No accessory structure shall be allowed within an access outlet. SECTION 3. Orono Municipal Code Section 11.31, Subdivision 5 is hereby deleted and the following language substituted in its place: Subdivision 5. Double frontage lots, access to lots, and front/back lot divisions. C. Double frontage lots. Double frontage and reversed frontage lots shall be avoided except where necessary to provide separation of residential development from tratfic ancrials or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. Access from any arterial ri)adway. Lots shall not, in general, derive access exclusively from an arterial roadway. Where driveway access from any arterial roadway may be necessary for several adjoining lots, the Council may require that such lots be served by a combined access drive in order to limit possible traffic hazard on such roadway. Where possible, driveways shall be designed and arranged so as to avoid requiring vehicles to back into traffic on any arterial roadway. From/back lot subdivisions. "Flag lots" and "easement back lots" as defined in Uiis Chapter (see definition of "Lot-Back") shall not be created. Frontyback lot divisions shall be allowed only in conjunction with the creation of an outlet to provide access from the back lot to the public or private road. Such outlot shall not be allowed as creditable lot area for either the back or front lots Frontyba:k lot saibdivisions shall adhere to the followuig standards' 1.Applicability. a.Front/back lot divisions may be used when existing property dimensions are narrow and deep, such that lot width does not allow for a side-by-side lot split, but acreage is adequate to provide a "front lot" and a back lot without requiring an area variance when the area ot the outlot .access corridor is excluded. b.Front/back lot divisions may be used for individual "lot splits", but may not be used when subdividing a large parcel into numerous lots if creation of a back lot is merely a convenience to the developer rather than supported by unique site factors. c.A front/back lot division shall not be allowed when any existing residence on a neighboring property abutting the proposed access outlot is located nearer its affected side lot line than a distance equivalent to the zoning district required front yard depth. Dimensional stand-’rds for back lots shall be as follows: a. b. Lot area shall be 150% of the zoning district requirement. D>t width measured parallel to the street at the rear of the "street yard" of a lakeshore back lot, or at the rear of the front yard of a nonlakeshore back lot, shall meet the zoning district width requirement. The street yard or front yard for any back lot will be a yard staning at the point where the narrow access outlot corridor ends and the creditable lot area begins. Lakeshore back lots shall meet the lot width standard at the shoreline, at the lakeshore setback and at the rear of the street yard. c.The depth of the required street yard or front yard shall be 150% of the zoning district front yard requirement. The side yard arwl rear yard depths for back lots shaO be 150% of the zoning district yard requirements. The lakeshore yard of a lakeshore back lot shall meet the zoning district lakeshore yard requirements. ] 3.Dimensional standards for front lots. A front lot created as part of a front/back lot division shall meet all zoning district area, width and setback standards, except that the side yard of the front lot adjacent to the access outlot shall be equivalent to the side street yard requirement for that zoning district. 4. Access requirements: a.Access outlots shall be 30’ minimum width, and shall be wide enough to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening without encroaching on neighboring properties. b.In approving front/back lot divisions, the City may require that both front lot and back lot share a driveway access within the access outlot if Council determines that creating an additional access to the existing street will be a potential safetv hazard. Driveways and parking areas within a back lot shall be located at least 10’ from the side or rear lot lines of adjacent lots. No more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot. e.No access outlot may be platted abutting an adjacent outlot except when the intent is to combine the two access outlots for creation of a public or private road meeting City standards. Screening requirements and accessory structure standards. Front/back lot subdivisions shall be designed in a manner such that the screening requirements and accessory structure standards of Section 10.03, Subdivision 27 can be met. The requirements and standards of this section shall apply only to those front/back lot divisions which receive preliminary plat approval after January 1, 1994. TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ron Moorse, City Administrator / A Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk November 17, 1993 Tax Forfeited Land 4; % Attachments: A. B. C. D. Department of Property Tax and Public Records Letter Dated 10/20/93 Map Identifying Properties Proposed Resolution - Tax Forfeited Land Rele ised for Sale to the Public Proposed Resolution - Requesting Conveyance of Tax Forfeit Lands for Public Use by the City of Orono The tax forfeited lands have been reviewed and staff recommends parcel P I D. 07-117-23 23 0001 be released for sale to the public and parcel’ P.I.D. 36-118-23 11 0002 be retained by the City for public road and utility use. Attachments C and D are proposed resolutions for Council adoption. HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AND PUBLIC RECORDS A-603 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0063Crossroadt To Servica OCT 2 1 1993 October 20. 1993 ( C ' W -- * —— Dorothy M. Hallin, Clerk City of Orono P 0 Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Ms. Hallin: Enclosed is a list of tax forfeited land located in your municipality. The land was classified as non conservation land on Non-Conservation Classification List 799-NC by Resolution No. 93-10-816 of the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners, adopted 10-12-93, a copy of which is enclosed. The described parcels were declared forfeited to the state of Minnesota by the Hennepin county auditor pursuant to Minnesota statutes providing for the forfeiture of real property for non-payment of taxes. Pursuant to M.S. 282.01 we request that vour city council either approve the oarceKs) for public auction, auction to adjacent owners if M.S. 282.01. subd. 7a is apolicableiunbuildabie lots), or request a conveyance to vour oovernmental subdivision for public use, The land mav be withheld from auction for one year bv filing a written application with the County Board through this department. Please be advised that if the city council fails to respond within ninety (90) davs of this request for classification, that the sale of the lands shall be deemed to be approved pursuant, to M S. 282.01. Subd. 1. The county requires that a certified copy of the resolution of the governing body of the governmental subdivision be submitted to authorize any requested action. If you request conveyance to your governmental subdivision, please complete and submit the form “Application by a Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Land* for each parcel of land requested. Conveyance to governmental subdivisions for public purposes is subject to the recommendation of the County Board, except as provided in M.S. 282.01, Subd. 1b (targeted neignborhood lands). The county requires that a specific public purpose be Identified in the request; “public purposes* or “other public purposes* is not acceptable. We ask that the governing body adopt language in its resolution affirming the non-conservation classification status and recommending disposition of the lands listed on List 799-NC. HENNEPIN COUNTY mn •quol opportumfy •mpAoy«r Non-Conservation List 799*NC letter, Page 2We aiso request that the resolution certify that none of the parceis recommended for public or adjacent owner auction need be withheld from sale pursuant to M.S. 85.012 (lands located within the boundaries of a state park), M.S. 92.461 (lands containing substantial deposits of peat), M.S. 282.01, Subd. 8 (minerals and mining permits), M.S. 282.018, Subd. 1 (waterfront lands bordering meandered lakes, public waters and watercourses), or M.S. 282.018, Subd. 2 (non-forested marginal lands or wetlands). Special assessments levied after the forfeiture must be certified to the county so that those special assessments may be included in the minimum purchase price. We ask your assistance in determining if any parcels on List 799-NC have wells. If any of the parcels on the list have wells, please request a Well Disclosure Certificaia from this department. Please provide additional pertinent information about parcels such as zoning, known soil conditions, or other municipal restrictions. Such information may assist the county in marketing the properties, and thus facilitate the return of the forfeited lands to the tax rolls. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact Rory Lucas, Terry Schuhler, or Gary Hoecherl at the Delinquent and Tax Forfeited Land Section, tel. 348-7839. Thanks for youi cooperation in this process. Sincerely, Kenneth Stevens, Acting Director Property Tax and Public Records Jeffrey L. Strand, Supervisor Delinquent and Tax Forfeited Land Section KS/JLS/ril Enclosures HENNEPIN COUNTY •n #quii ofPfM^rtumtv NON-CONSERVATION CLASSIFICATION LIST 799-NCPIDPROPERTY ADDRESS PROPERTY TYPE SPECIAL COMMENTS PAGES 07117 23 23 0001 ADDRESS UNASSIQNED RESIDENTIAL LAND 36118 2311 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAND RESIDENTIAL PREVIOUS OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATE OF DATE OF BUILDING MARKET JUDGEMENT FORFEITURE VALUE VALUE ORONO (30) O LARRY LEE COM AT A PT IN W LINE OF TONKAVIEW GARDENS DIS 1320 FT S MEAS AT RT ANGLES FROM N LINE OF NW 1/4 TH W PAR WITH SAID N LINE TO A PT IN A LINE RUNNING FROM APT IN N UNE OF NW 1/4 DIST 402.5 FT E FROM NW COR THEREOF TO A PT IN 8 UNEOF NW 1/4 DIST 396.5 FT E FROM SW COR THEREOF TH SLY ALONG LAST DESC LINE TO NLY LINE OF BERQUIST AND WICKLUNDS ADDN TO BERQUIST AND WICKLUNDS PARK TH ELY ALONG SAID NLY LINE TO W LINE OF TONKAVIEW GARDENS TH N ALONG SAID UNE TO BEG UNPLATTED 07 117 23 4/10/90 6/17/93 41,5 D N LOVE ATM LOVE S 16.6 FT OF N 691.6 FT OF E 298.35 FT OF QOYT LOT 3 EXCEPT ROAD UNPLATTED 36 118 23 4/16/90 5/20/93 100 #•»Ooo RESOLUTION NO. 93-10-816 The following resolution was offered by the Ways and Means Committee: BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners hereby certify the Non-Conservation status of all parcels of land on Non-Conservation Classification List 799-NC, on file with the Clerk of the County Board, and the Menneoin County Board of Commissioners hereby request approval /rom the Minnesota^Department of Natural Resources for the sale of tax forfeited land listed on Non-Conservation Classification List 799-NC. The question was on the adoption of the resolution, and there were Seven YEAS and No NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEJ^.NAY OTHER Hike Opat 1 Sandra Hilary 1 Peter HcLaughlin Randy Johnson 1 John Keefe 1 Emily Anne Staples 1 Hark Andrew, Chair 1 RESOLUTION ADOPTEU. ATTEST Cler^ oHthe County Board (J OCT 12 1993 J d r Q 07-117-23 23 0001 *9 : lao.iS.tM i (oe) ! 1 ^ »• e»*'t TAX FORFEITED LAND RELEASED FOR SALE TO THE PUBLIC WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282, the City has received from Hennepin County a list of lands within the City which have become the property of the State of Minnesota for non-payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lands for compliance with local zoning ordinances, for the amount of outstanding special assessments remaining unpaid to the City, and/or for possible public use by the City as authorized by the Statutes. In addition the Council has reviewed said lands and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 85.021, 92.461, 282.01, Subd. 8, 282.018, Subd 1, or 282.018, Subd 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Orono, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282, hereby approves the classii-ication of each of the following parcels of land as non-conservation land, and furthermore, approves the public .:ale of each parcel of land as listed below. All parcels remain subject to all applicable zoning ordinance provisions, including those regulations providing for minimum lot area and minimum lor width. Substandard parcels may be useable only in comijination with other adjoining parcel(s). Release of these lands by the City Council is subject to the condition that all outstanding special assessments shall be paid in full to the City upon return to private ownership. Any amount not recovered at the time of sale shall be subject t? reassessment by the City. District 38 PARCEL RELEASED FOR SALE P.I.D. 07 117 23 23 0001 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held the 22nd day of November, 1993. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk REQUESTING CONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEIT LANDS FOR PUBLIC USE BY THE CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS; the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS; pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282, the City has received from Hennepin County a list of lands within the City which have become the property of the State of Minnesota for non-payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS; the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners have classified said lands as non-conservation land and have authorized the sale of each such parcel of land subject to review and release by the City; and WHEREAS; the City Council has reviewed said lands for compliance with local zoning ordinances, for the amount of outstanding special assessment remaining unpaid to the City, and/or for possible public use by the City as authorized by the statutes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono, pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 282.01, Subdivision 1, hereby applies to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the Commissioner of Revenue for conveyance of the following tax forfeited land to the City for public use by the City of Orono. PARCELS RETAINED FOR USE BY THE CITY 38 P.I.D.Public Purpose 36 118 23 11 0002 Public Road and Utility Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held the 22nd day of November, 1993, by a vote of - - ayes and _ _ nays. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Date: To: From: Subject: November 18, 1993 % Ron Moorse, City Administrator '"n (1 . \l\'\/Ox''' ^ MSteve Sullivan, Chief of Polic Resignation of CSO David Nelson % % Community Service Officer David Nelson officially resigned from the Orono Police Department on November 9, 1993 after having given written notice earlier. We do have a need to fill this position with another person and request permission to begin the hiring process. TO:Mayor and City Council Ron J. Moorse, City Administrator / L FROM: DATE; SUBJECT: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director ✓ November 18, 1993 4, C/^"6/ Certification of Delinquent Septic Inspec^2^ Sewer and Water Utility Accounts and Recy«5^g ^ v Program Fee Attachments:A. Resolution Providing for Collection of Delinquent Sewer, Water and Septic Accounts and Recycli.ng Program Fee B. Assessment Roll DISCUSSION - Each year the City certifies to the County all unpaid annual service charges for the septic inspection program, the annual recycling program fee, and all delinquent sewer and water accounts of $15.00 or more, to be collected with the following year's taxes. In addition to the outstanding amounts delinquent the City adds 0% interest to all accounts and an administrative fee to the septic accounts. At this time the total to be assessed is $52,832.90 including administrative charges. This amount will be decreased by any prepayments received up to the final payment date of November 29, 1993. A copy of the assessment roll is attached for your review. seconded by to adopt ResolutionPROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, - - - - - - -- -. . # providing for the collection of delinquent charges for 1993 sewer and water utility services and annual septic inspection and recycling program fees. Ayes _, Nays _. A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OP DELINQUENT 1993 SEWER AND WATER UTILITY SERVICE CHARGES, RECYCLING PROGRAM FEES AND ANNUAL SERVICE CHARGES FOR THE ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT (SEPTIC) INSPECTION PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota has enacted certain ordinances under the Minnesota statutes, therefore pursuant to Chapter 3 and Chapter 12, Orono City Code pertaining to payment and collection of sewer and water charges and annual service charges for the On-Site Sewage Treatment (septic) Inspection Program, the following properties are delinquent in nature. 1. WHEREAS, the Cicy has obtained from Hennepin County Auditor Le^ Number 12949 for the delinquent accounts. 2. That the Hennepin County Auditor be and is hereby authorized and directed to extend upon property tax lists of the County and further collect said assessments thereon in the manner provided by law. 3. That eight percent (8%) be added to the amounts due. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held November 22, 1993. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 1 HC 1210 (1-79) Orono SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RATE CARD ADD CHANGE DELETE DOCUMENT MUNIC CODE 38 AUTH. T.FVY NUMBER 12949 PROJECT NUMBER T.PVV description 1993 Del Util Charges frn'TAT. PPn.TECT ASSESSMENT $52,832.98 SERVICE CHARGE .50 T.tTMPED/SPREAD CODE INTEREST RATE 8% rnST PER UNIT _ NO. YEARS PAYABLE One FIRST YEAR PAYABLE 1994 MO. INT. FIRST YEAR 13 DATE FIXED CHARGE PERM. SPEC, CODE (! AfStm A REPOQT N3RDATE OF RUNMUNICIPALCODE38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 ci 31 39 39 39 39 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 SUMRPT-lii/17/93 LEVYNUMBER012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012943 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012f»49 012949 012949 ORONO CEPTiriCATION SYSTEM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLSPROPERTY ID02-117 02-117 02-117 02-117 02-117 02-117 02- 117 03- 117 03-117 03-117 03-117 03- 117 04- 117 04-117 04-117 04-117 04-117 04-117 04- 117 05- 117 05-117 05-117 05-117 05-117 05-117 05-117 05- 117 06- 117 06-117 06- 117 07- 117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 23-21 23-21 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-43 23-44 23-13 23-21 23-24 23-31 23-44 23-11 23-14 23-22 23-22 23-24 23-42 23-43 23-11 23-13 23-14 23-14 23-21 23-22 23-34 23-41 23-22 23-41 23-43 23-14 23-14 23-14 23-14 23-21 23-24 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-31 •23-32 •23-32 23-32 23-32 •23-32 •23-32 •23-33 •23-33 •23-33 •23-34 23-41 •23-41 •23-41 0001 0010 0011 0018 0040 0026 0008 0006 0015 0009 0003 0003 0009 0002 0003 0006 0004 0014 0002 0001 0039 0039 0055 0015 0007 0001 0017 0004 0099 0012 0018 0020 0054 0065 0003 0029 0001 0004 0023 0031 0003 0009 0010 0021 •0027 0030 0004 •0005 •0010 •0003 0008 •0030 •0054 * 4 * il AADDITIONNUMBER42840 42840 42560 42560 42560 42760 41420 42270 00360 03104 41303 01647 02550 41500 41520 43109 41520 43174 41500 41440 41900 41900 41900 42007 41440 42880 00362 41306 42620 00641 42440 42440 43240 43240 41307 43500 41940 41940 43080 43500 42000 42000 42000 42000 43132 43080 43360 43360 43360 41940 43120 43120 43120 PAGE: 1DISTRICT: ALLCERTIFIEDAMOUNT75.00 75.00 252.53 252.53 84.89 252.53 19.39 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 60.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 15.00 25.00 75.00 75 75 75 68 75 75 252 134 193 252 134 134 252 252 134 474 252 193 252 58 252 252 40 252 00 00 00 74 00 00 S3 89 71 53 89 89 53 53 89 49 53 71 53 43 53 53 70 53 252.53 58 82 134 252 252 227 89 53 53 53 252.53 REPORT NBR. DATE OF RUN SUMRPT-l11/17/93MUNICIPAL CODE 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 3C! 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 LEVY NUMBER 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 9•ORONO CERTIFICATION SYSTEM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLSPROPERTY ID 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07-117 07- 117 08- 117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08-117 08- 117 09- 117 09- 117 10- 117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10-117 10- 117 11- 117 16- 117 17- 117 17-117 17-117 17-117 23-41 23-43 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-13 23-23 23-23 23-23 23-31 23-33 23-33 23-33 23-33 23-34 23-34 23-34 23-41 23-41 23-41 23-41 23-41 23-41 23-41 23-42 23-44 23-44 23-13 23-44 23-12 23-24 23-24 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-34 23-32 •23-22 23-21 23-21 23-21 '23-22 -0071 -0014 -0003 -0014 -0020 -0021 -0026 -0027 -0033 -0062 -0006 -0003 -0019 -0020 -0015 -0059 -0066 -0071 -0075 -0010 -0053 -0058 -0001 -0002 -0004 -00C6 -0007 -0012 -0014 -0003 -0002 -0008 -0008 -0005 -0002 -0008 -0032 -0001 -0004 -0018 -0022 -0036 -0048 -0050 -0057 -0072 -0002 -0001 -0003 -0008 -0018 -0027 -0019 ADDITION PAGE: 2DISTRICT: ALLCERTIFIED NUMBER AMOUNT 43120 58 82 43120 252.5342300252.53 42300 252.5342300252 53 42300 252 5342300101.38 42300 252.5342300252.53 42300 252.53 41480 58.82 41308 252.53 42460 58.8242460134 89 41860 252.53 42180 374.83 42280 252.5342280213.7542280252.53 41600 252.53 42200 101.6842180424.26 41308 193 7141308260.20413081,073.28 41308 252.53 41308 243.71 41308 901.14 42500 252.53 42500 319 11 41308 252.53 42005 252 53 43181 7 5.00 42215 252.53 41310 75.00 41310 219.60 41310 252.534131073.05 41310 252.53 41310 56.82 42140 252.53 42140 252.5342520159.01 42520 252.53 42520 252.53 42540 252.53 43072 75.00 43020 75 00 41670 58 82 43104 200 00 43180 30 5243180273.05 42060 432.30 r. REPORT NBR. DATE OF RUN SUMRPT-111/17/93MUNICIPALCODE383S 38 3S 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 381 3 8 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 LEVYNUMBER012949012949012949012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012049 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 ORONO CERTIFICATION SYSTEM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLSPROPERTY iO17-11717-11717-11717-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 17-117 n-117 17-117 17-117 23-2223-2223-2223-22 23-22 23-23 23-23 23-23 23-23 23-24 23-24 23-31 23-31 23-31 23-34 23-34 23-34 23-41 23-41 23-41 23-41 23-41 23-4? 23-41 23-41 23-42 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-43 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 23-44 •23-44 •23-44 ►23-44 00230025 00280029 0035 0008 0017 0019 0021 0002 0027 0017 0030 0041 0012 0024 0026 0003 0004 0009 0014 0016 0021 0023 0028 0021 0016 0035 0044 0046 0056 0069 0074 0075 0076 0087 0U95 0098 0104 0118 0134 0144 0022 0029 0039 0058 0060 0079 0083 0091 •0096 •0098 •0102 « A * * *ADDITION PAGE : 3DISTRICT: ALLCERTIFIEDNUMBERAMOUNT42060348 3642060493 6442060330.0842060329 30 42510 37 82 42220 294 25 42225 439 61 42510 252 59 42510 122 13 41317 400 16 43180 425 1043111430 85 42420 258 2843620506 78 42420 387 25 01777 442 5801777397.24 43040 398 70 43040 708 33 42420 457 13 42420 379 7243540359 44 43540 452.74 43540 377.62 43540 82.70 01398 344.68 42740 432 29 42740 106.06 42740 330.76 42740 101.68 42740 341 76 42740 295 6642740116.29 42740 206.77 42740 502.40 42740 411 84 42740 95 844/7iO 1.456 09 42740 323.54 43620 392.86 43620 207 3201122104 80 43540 350 52 43540 417 68 43540 389 88 43540 84 25 43600 101 68 43600 403 08 43540 474 65 00369 88 54 43540 435.22 43540 26.97 42420 351 98 *7 «r- REPORT NBRDATE OF RUNAiNICIPALCODE3t38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 31 38 31 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 SUMRPT-l11/17/93 LEVYNUMBER012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012S43 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 r •.■>949 )l* ^49 oi;i>9 0}2849 -49 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 CERTIFICATION SYSTEM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLSPROPERTY ID18-117 18-117 20-11720-117 20-11/ 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20-117- 20- 117- 21- 117- 21-117- 21-117- 21-117- 21-117- 21-117- 25- 118- 26- 118- 27-118- 27-118- 27-118- 30- 118- 31- 118- 31-118- 31-118- 31-118- 31-118- 31-118- 31-118- 31- 118- 32- 118- 32-118- -23-14 -23-14 -23-12 -23-12 -23-12 -23-12 -23-14 -23-21 -2J-21 -23-22 -23-22 -23-23 -23-24 -23-24 -23-24 -23-24 -23-24 -23-24 -23-24 -23-31 -23-32 23-32- 23-34 23-34- 23-42- 23-42- 23-42- 23-43- 23-43- 23-43- 23-43- 23-22- 23-22- 23-23- 23-24- 23-24- 23-24- 23-44- 23-33- 23-32- 23-42- 23-42- 23-44- 23-12- 23-14- 23-22- 23-31- 23-33- 23-41 23-41 23-42 23-22 23-23 0002 OOOS 0015 0021 0028 -0046 -0018 -0020 -0035 -0002 -0015 -0013 -0007 -0013 -0014 -0018 -0017 -0030 -0040 -006 7 -0015 -0016 -0002 -0020 -0022 -0032 -0033 -0016 ■0022 ■0035 ■0043 •0005 •0008 ■0033 ■0040 0054 0065 0011 0016 0004 0008 0010 0009 0012 0001 0008 0004 0005 0004 0007 0001 0005 0007 ADDITIONNUMBER42220 42220 42720 42720 42420 00719 42420 42420 01415 42420 42420 42020 4/020 42020 42020 42020 42020 43300 42020 42020 43300 42020 43081 43088 43480 43300 43480 43300 43300 43640 43640 43220 4322.( 43530 43149 43079 43085 01730 42390 41327 42470 42470 03522 4133141331 00721 41331 41331 41331 41331 41331 42820 42820 PAGE: 4DISTRICT; ALLCERTl«-IED AMOUN•187.IT 465.90 359.28 403.08 95 84 168 189 487 185 389 135 465 52 429 144 85 63 80 65 94 84 89 35 38 91 150.00 344.68 326.38 400.16 436.69 550.60 113.37 127.54 46.18 348.59 329.30 438.15 73.83 460.05 335.92 460 72 543 335 347 117 512 75 75 10 .06 25 30 15 60 68 63 00 00 00 75.00 75.00 75.00 72.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 REPORT NBR DATE OF RUNMUNICIPALCODE38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 SUMRPT-111/17/93 LEVYNUMBER012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 012949 ORONO CERTIFICATION SYSTEM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLSPROPERTY ID32- 118 33- 118 33-118 33-118 33-118 33-118 33- 118 34- 118 35- 118 36- 118 36-118 36-118 36-118 23-4323-13 23-24 23-31 23-34 23-34 23-44 23-33 23-42 23-11 23-33 23-41 23-41 0010 0011 0003 0003 0002 0004 0030 0056 0001 0010 0015 0006 0026 PAGE; 5DISTRICT: ALL TOTAL ADDITION CERTIFIEDNUMBERAMOUNT 41332 75.00435151,165.144133375.004133375.004133375.0041333/S 0042210252.534133475.004133575.004133675.004271075.004231071.19 42310 211 04 52.832 98 m / >TO: FROM: t »Mayor Call"han and City Council Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE:November 19, 1993 SUBJECT:Levy Sewer Connection Fee for Nettles S^j^ebty ATTACHMEirr:Resolution to approve connection to Munici^l Sewer of the property located at 1940 Shoreline Drive The attached resolution sets forth the conditions to be met by Mr Nettles regarding the connection of his sewer to the Crystal Bay area sanitary sewer. As agreed Mr. Nettles will pay directly to the City 8/15ths of the $11,218.00 connection fee. (This is the eight year of the original 15 year levy.) The balance remaining of $5,235.09 will be levied for a period of seven years, equal the number of years remaining on those properties originally assessed. The levy will be at the sam.e interest rate as the original, 9.20%. REQUESTED ACTION: presented. Adoption of the attached resolution as PROPOSED MOTION: Resolution # Moved by seconded by to adopt , A Resolution to Approve Connection to Municipal Sewer of the Property Located at 1940 Shoreline Drive. Motion: Ayes_ _ _, Nays_ A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONNECTION TO MUNICIPAL SEWER OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1940 SHORELINE DRIVE WHEREAS, Alan Nettles (hereinafter the propeny owner) is owner of the property, including single family residence, located at 1940 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: The southwesterly 121.12 feet of Lot 5, Llbridge S. Barnes First Addition, in Section 10, Township 117. Range 23, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the property); and WHEREAS, on June 4. 1993 the applicant submitted a letter to the City requesting that his property be allowed to connect to the municipal sewer which is located in the right-of-way of County Road 15 approximately 20 feet from his southeasterly propeny comer; and WHEREAS, said municipal sewer line is pan of the City’s 1985-LS-l Crystal Bay sewer lateral project, for which properties benefitting by such system were assessed for the costs of said system; and WHEREAS, the property at 1940 Shoreline Drive was not provided w ith a sewer stub as pan of Project 1985-LS-l, it was not assessed for that project, and was not incorporated within the MUSA boundary created for said project; and WHEREAS, the applicant has made formal application to the City for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to relocate the .MUSA boundary to include his property, which amendment was approved by the City Council in Resolution #3348 on October 25, 1993. and! approved by the Metroptilitan Council on November 4. 1993; and W HEREAS. the property is located on the lakeshore of Lake .Minnetonka and contains a single family residence with a failing septic system. The prop**rty is approximately 2.2 acres in area and includes wetlands, and therefore is not further .subdividable under the lot requirements of the LR-IA zoning district. A municipal sewer lateral e.xists approximately 20 feet from the property, requiring no extension of the municipal sewer. The costs of replacing the existing failing septic system with a fully conforming septic system approximate the costs of the connection charge for the 1985-LS-l project plus the SAC charge and connection costs to be borne by the property owner; and WHEREAS, allowing the property to connect to the municipal sew'er will not be in conflict with the goals and policies of the Orono Community Management Plan, in that no extension of municipal sewer is required, no new high density development will occur as a result of the MUSA boundar>' expansion, and Lake Minnetonka will be further protected by the elimination of a failing septic system located on a lakeshore lot; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested that the current connection charge of $11,218.00 be split into a portion to be paid prior to connection and a portion to be levied as a special assessment, in proportions approximating those paid and remaining assessments of the properties in the Crystal Bay project; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to establish an easement for possible future sewer construction which may occur on or in the right-of-way adjacent to the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that the property at 1940 Shoreline Drive shall be allowed to make connection to the municipal sewer subject to the following conditions: 1 2. 3. Prior to making the connection, applicant shall pay to the City 8/15th’s of the $11,218.00 connection charge or $5,982.91. The remaining $5,235.09 shall be levied as a special assessment for a period of seven (7) years at an interest rate of 9.20%. The effective date of this levy shall be November 22. 1993. Applicant shall pay the current sewer availability charge and applicant’s contractor sh.ill obtain a comiection permit prior to connecting to the municipal sewer. The method and liKafion of the connection, which will likely require installation of a new ’ stub into the existing sewer line, shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to making such connection. Tfie applicant shall bear all costs of making said connection and restoration of City right-of-ways, if required 1993. ATTEST: Prior to connection, applicant shall grant to the City a permanent easement for sanitary sewer and utility purposes for future sewer construction across or adjacent to applicant’s property, such easement to meet with the approval of the Public Works Director. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 22nd day of November, Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk L TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Tom Kuehn. Finance Director ' \ DATE:November 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Call 1980 Bonds <v-'V Attachments: Letter from Ehlers 11/18/93 Notice of Call for 1980 Bonds Resolution Calling for Redemption of 1980 Bonds The Council has authorized staff to proceed with the call of the 1980 Bonds so that the residual fund» of that fund can be used to assist in payment of the 1989 debt service. To that end we have requested from Carolyn Drude of Ehlers a form of resolution and the notice of call for redemption of the 1980 Bonds. The attached letter describes the necessary procedure to follow regarding this action. Requested Action: Authorization to call 1980 bonds by adoption of resolution and council direction of staff to publish notice of call. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by to adopt Resolution Calling For the Redempticm of the General Obligation Bonds of 1980. and to staff to publish the Notice of Call for Redemption of the 1980 Bonds. Motion, Ayes Nays_. I«». • i. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. f i E A 0 J a s” I N p u 8 l 1C F I N A .H C e L November 18, 1993 Tom Kuehn Finance Director City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 cc: Jana Ristamaki Re: Early call of 1980 bonds Enclosed is a form of resolution and Notice of Call for Redemption for your use In connection with the redemption of whe 1995 and 1996 maturities of the issue on March 1, 1994, Notice Should be mailed to the Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. at the address shown in the notice at least 30 days prior to the March 1 , 1994 date. Also, notice should be published in an Industry publication at least 30 days prior to March 1 as wen. We can assist in the selection of the publication (based upon cost, lead time, etc.) You can expect to receive a statement from Norwest after they have received your notice indicating the total amount due on March 1. including the S150,000 principal amount being cjl‘S<> prior to stated maturity dates. You can expect to pay t. e following: $ 84.656.25Scheduled P & I 3/1/94 Principal being called (3/1/95 and 3/1/96 maturities) is premium on called bonds Total $236,156.25 the action to call the remaining 1980 bonds) -to OFFICES IN UlNNfAWLlS. MN * SnOOXFlfLO. Wl • aso Narwtfl Cvm • » s«««i> s«vtn» s»ii> • MwwfWOM Ml* SS*02-4t00 • r t'" C: ll' '! i'ur .k. fS '^5 09 -* *^rr'-’*. ♦ S.3 Totn Kuehn Crystal Bay, MN 55323 .S'cvember 18, 1993 Page 2 excess funds In tne 1980 Bond Fund to the City's Fund and to direct that receipts of assessments yet to be collected for the 1980 Issue be deposited Into that fund as well. This might be a separate .^Av-hanc voiiM It’lfp tn Add n^r^Granh tn thp uMnn faction or perhaps you'd like to add a paragraph to the resolution for «.iy.-«r.cn Ac W3 discussed prevlously, you will want to discussthis purpose. As wa d- - - . ... this with your auditor so It meets with his/her approval. Let me know if you have questions. Sincerely, AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Carolyn Drude Executive Vice President/Director enc P.S.Tom, please contact Jana Ristamaki to discuss the publication of the notice. r L ' ♦*.% Notice of Call for Redemption General Obligation Improvement Bends of 1930 City of Oreno Hennepin County, Minnesota NOTICt IS HEREBY GIVEN That by order of the City Council of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on March 1, 1994 those outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation improvement Bonds of 1980 dated December 1, 1980, which mature on the dates and bear interest at the rates sat forth below: Maturi ty Date Interest Rate CUSIP Number 3/1/95 3/1/96 8.60^ 8.75? 687119 rF 9 687119 FG 7 Such Bonds will cease to bear interest on March 1, 1994. Uoon presentation and surrender of said Bonds, you will be ?a1<- the principal amount of such Bonds plus a premium of 1» and accrued interest to the date of redemption. Owners of called bonds should also provide a fully-executed W-9 Taxpayer Identification Number Certificate and return with the called bond. If by Mail:Nonvest Bank Minnesota, N.A. Attn: Corporate Trust Operations 255 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55479-0113 A service fee will be deducted from any payments reouested to be made by wire transfer. Phone inquiries may be made by calling (612) 667-9764. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Ron Moorse City Administrator CS-CIAfl £f-L£“2 ^ le^TEr RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE REDEMPTION OF $150,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1980 A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, Issued $1,100^000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS dated Decemoar 1, 1980; and B. WHEREAS, Bonds maturing in the years 1991 through 1996 are subject’to redemotion and prepayment at th« option of the City on March 1, 1990 and any interest payment date thereafter at a price of lOU of’par plus accrued interest, as provided in the resolution of the City Council dated .loveirber 12, 1980, authorizing the issuance of the Bonds; and C. WHEREAS, the City Council deems it desirable and in the best interests of tne City to call Bonds totalling $150,000 in principal amount (those Bonds due in the years 1995 and 1996), on March 1, 1994, in accordance with the resolution; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as follows; (1) Redemotion. Bonds totalling $150,000 in principal amount, due in the years 1995 and 1996, shall be redeemed and prepaid on March 1 , 1994 at lOU of par, plus accrued interest for each sucn Bond called. (2) The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give mailed and published notice of call at least 30 days to March 1. 1994. Said notice shall be in substantially the form hereto attached. (3) Deposit of ""unds. The City Clerk is hereby authonzed and directed to deposit witn the bank where the Bonds are payable prior to said call date sufficient funds to oay all pnncipa an interest due on the Bonds as of the call data. TO; FROM: DATE; SUBJECT; Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 17, 1993 Appoint Insurance Agent of Record for 1994 Vs V Attachment: Agent of Record Agreement The agent of record agreement with Mr. Duweyn Carlson of the Apple Valley Insurance Agency renews on January 1. The service fee for 1994 is $7,650 and is included in the 1994 insurance budget. The agent fee is stated at a gross amount and is reduced by commissions earned through the policy premiums paid by the city. For example the fee for service in 1993 was $7,250.00, however, the net direct cost to the city after applying commissions earned was $2,612.09. Requested Action: Council appointment of Mr. Duweyn Carlson, Apple Valley Agency, as insurance agent of record for 1994. rt.* -PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by by to appoint Mr._, seconded _ Duweyn Carlson, Apple Valley Agency, as Insurance Agent of Record for 1994, at a fee not to exceed $7,650.00, including commissions earned on policy premiums paid by the City. Ayes _, Nays _. A 0^ CITY OF ORONO AGENT OF RECORD AGREEMENT Duweyn P. Carlson of the Apple Valley Agency agrees to perform the following services for the City of Orono: 1. The negotiation and placement of all the required insurance; 2 .Information on relevant changes in insurance markets, products and services; 3 .Assistance coverages; in developing comprehensive insurance 4 . 5. Provide an insurance policy inventory and summary; A complete accounting of commissions earned (direct only) on the account; 6. A cumulative five-year premium and loss record; 7.Prepare an allocation of premium by department as required by the City; 8. Loss exposure list and classification; up-dated annually; 9. Assist with a?.l claims and losses; 10 .Assistance in minimizing premiums; reviewing and auditing rating basis, formulas, etc. 11.Assistance in loss prevention engineering and loss control; 12. Willingness to keep an in-agency record of looses including reserves established; 13. Assist the City in Risk Management program The fee for service for the Insurance Policy year 1994 will be $7,650.00 and will cover the following: 1. Conduct an Exposure survey and prepare specifications 2. Obtain quotes 3. Review policies, billings and claims CITY OF ORONO agent op record agreement Page 2 The City agrees to pay $1,000.00 upon delivery o" policies, and the balance of $6,650.00. less commissions received, upon documented presentation. This agreement is valid for the calendar year 1394. APPLE VALLEY AGENCY Date Duweyn Carlson CITY OF ORONO Date Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Date 111793.7 Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator I 1 /iL JO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ron Moorsc. City Administrator I DATE: November 19. 1993 SUBJECT: Appoint Auditor for Fiscal Year 1993 V % We have requested a cost estimate i-om the audit firm of Malloy, Kamowski. Radosevich & Companv for performing the 1993 fiscal year audits. They have submitted a total estimate ot $15 700 excluding direct expenses and excluding any additional expenses incurred as a result ut Implication to the Certificate of Achievement tor Excellence in Financial Reporting. This compares with an actual cost for the 1992 audits ot $15,400 plus $747 tor direct expenses and $2,250 for the certificate program. The 1993 FY cost estimates are: Audit Cost a. b. Annual audit for the City Minnesota legal compliance audit TOTAL Certificate of Achievement Cost not to exceed $14,500 $ 1,200 $15.700 S 1.500 In 199' Ihc budget for the 1992 audits was $16,070. plus $3,914 for the Cenilicatc of Achievement and direct costs. The 1994 budget is $16,300 for the 1993 audits, plus $4,110 for the Certificate and direct costs. Requested Action - Council approval of the appointment of the audit firm ot Malloy, Kamowski, Radosevich & Co., C.P.A.’s to perform the required audits for the 1993 fiscal year records. in Financial Reporting Program at a cost not to exceed $1,.500. Ayes _. Na>s r / o LIST OP LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1993 % er:' 7 Residential Kennel License - Wayne E. & Gayle D. Car^jtcr 1376 North Am Drive ^ \ ' Home Occupation License -Balance Consulting Group 2597 Lydiard Circle Septic System Installer License - Duane Ritter Exc. 7120 Vernon Street Rockford % . <> Off Sale Liquor -Steve Corl Navarre Liquors 3421 Shoreline Drive On Sale Liquor -Jimmie Holtz Jimmies Lounge 3380 Shoreline Drive Club Liquor - Woodhill Country Club 200 Woodhill Road Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Bvculevard Non-Intoxicatinj Liquor Off Sale -William Wear Orono Shopping Center 2160 Wayzata Boulevard - John 0'Sull*/an O'Sullivan's 2420 Shadywood Road Non-Intoxicating Liquor On Sale - Orono Golf Course 265 Orono Orchard Road South KZ^INEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, 13 ^*^ to December 31, 19 f owner: (A/a-ZiJ^ <f. (s^YLe V-___-------------------------------------------------------------- Sroperry Address: /37^ A KM Moua/J? . ■S'S Si.'f (Include city ana—n^pT” Mailing Address (if different):.___________________________________________________ Phone: (home^<7/- - - (work)-- - - - - RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Inf oration: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: _ _ (over 3 months of age) Principal Breed: PCG - - Purpose for more than 2 doas; —'^PqCS ///_ Dogs normally kept: 'X inside _ _ kennel structure — ~ *<f* <*/* yarcf -//U/ _^CIAL Kennel License Information: $150.00 ncitU€>t^'s (payment must accompany application) ^ -----if Name of Business: Business Activities:__” bSIidJni;^-reedrnA versrrnary c.re, rerari-ec=.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Co*:tact: (jtame) ^’phon Dog runs/exercise areas are eT inside outside both ciT) OF CfiCHQ iTHAvrc nccjrc 9 unde/signed acknowledges that a kennel and does not grant any autnority P” gran« IfhTcit"pVriaYsisrorto*TnsV«ct’ the%reaises Prior to iic:": dS?:tIo*n\ "n^d -e "^nd%'i's^%n%%;7gf license approval. Applicant Date A/^B For City Use Only Kennel Inspected by Recommends Approval Date // /jn ^ Denial CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, 1335 So Brow7i Rd Cr^’stal Bay, MIJ 5532 3 • _ Application Date; 02- 9 ^ Date License Approved:_ _ _ Date License Expires: A^PUciTIoil'pOR A.^a£ home OCCOPATIOH LICPBSE .00 NAME: i'^Vf ADDRESS ; v r^P/4f.'P C.c', t-X PHONE; 7^ _ CITY; No. of Employees within operation;PrSt-Ide llsr of °f thi^ application. Type of Business to be Operated;- - - - - - - - "tslTu%l:LT JtLlTi =4^o"aJ^‘n7aJ:n business days. Tbe license application with '5ta.ffDUS2JDeSS aays. xue iiceji&e ----------------—- scheduled before the Council at the next re^’iarly scheduled meeting hel on tJie second and fouiiih Monday of each monl-h* :s=s=ss tv sss: ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPA.p:ONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C) Prohibited Home Occupation Practices. 1. 7^ It is unlawful for any business operating as a'heme occup^^.^p:j,-<.m,0 engage in operation wrthcjt proper licenses. OFFICE i 71 i All persons engaged in the business must reside rn the dwelling^^ • 3.n. 4. No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises. 5. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed. 6.Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure. __ The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional conditions the City may require. Signature of Applicant;Date , C>/7A/ 75 FOR CITY USE ONLY; After review of application, staff recommends ^ne follow'ing; ______ Approval of License Denial of Lic'»r.se Signature of Zoning Official; Da-«J--------------- Signature cf Fire Inspector; rJcLU.^hA/^_________________ - Date:—|J—^f CITY of ORONO (612) 473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay^ MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTAIXSPS LICENSE APPLICATION All cuestions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate or insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification must be attacne*.. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. ^ C) 1. 2. 3. Business or trade name Business address Business phone ^ ^Residence phone /_—^ Name of applicant certification ■ comoany representative holding MPCA Tv ’pe of certification held: — Pumper Certificate expiration date r — ' ^ Lf Have vou ever held a Septic System Ipsta 1 ler license in Orono before? ^ Most recent year Have you ever had a license revoked?When? Where?______________________________—--------------------------------- 8 9 DO you do Municipal Sewer hcok-ups? Yes - No Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes - - - - No f 7f f ^Afsrsrsi\ 1 WAAte^WWV n i rrv r,-» /V rucri^ c. I Tft u SUBMITTALS REQUIRED W*i1l */*• wTV RECEIPT-THAfiK YOUacBtsio cool ROi riii . ' '*'' ^ 4/yf 1. ^$50.00 Licen'-;e aoplication fee. “"•* ikr 2. v/$2000.00 lice.-pe and permit bond namxng City of Orono ^ ^ ’ /jbligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accrued.trifpi V- O . X 3. *'$50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance '^ 4. ^Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED .... ..... ■!!!! and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of e Date City Q^-Orono. CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: w Denial Date im±3^ City Council Action Date Date license mailed __ _ _ Approved Denied _ Date: To: From: Subject: November 8/ 1993 Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^ ‘ Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police^^ Liquor License Renewal I have reviewed the application of Navarre Liquors (Steven Morris Corl) at 3421 Shoreline Drive for Off Sale Liquor License. Routine background investigation was conducted. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. - Date:November 8, 1993 Date:November 10, 1993 To: From: Subject: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police Liquor License Renewal I have reviewed the application of Woodhill Country Club (Nark A Albrecht) to renew liquor license. A background investigation was conducted. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. Date: To: From: Subject: November 18, 1993 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police^ Club On Sale Retail Liquor License Renewal I have reviewed the application from the Wayzata Country Club (John Alexander DovTney) for a Club On Sale Retail Liquc>r License. Routine background investigation was conducted and no problems were found. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. L i Date: To: From: Subject: November 18/ 1993 Ron Moorse/ City Administrator Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police Retail "Off Sale” License I have reviewed the application from the Orono Shopping Center (William w. Wear) for renewal of his Retail ”Off Sale” license. Routine background investigation was conducted and no problems were found. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. Date: To: From: Subject: November 8, 1993 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police Liquor License Renewal I have reviewed the application of O'Sullivans (John Michael O'Sullivan) of 2420 Shadywood Road for O^f Sale Beer License. Routine background investigation was conducted. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. Date: To: From: Subject: November 17, 1993 Ron Moorse, City Administrator f\ \ r KSteve Sullivan, Chief of Police^\SiJ^ Non-Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal I have reviewed the application from the Orono Golf Course for Retail "On-Sale” non-intoxicating liquor license. Routine background investigation was conducted and no problems were found. I have no objection to the issuance of this license y I -V'^‘ • *. ■' • k-» •*•-• • M -%. ♦ r*-. ' . »*» • ■* • • • *. • * . •••. 4^ * *•. f * • ■ • ‘ ' •. ' .'• .* • • 4" V V . .4 ■ V**A. A * ^ ••-• - -*• • * ■ .. • • - . . • ■ » - • -• , . » •. •A .• • V- - .4 . * *, •■*0* -•■•* ^ •* * 'V * - 4 »--'Z-, • * •• * ’♦ • ’ • • • ' • - • % r0 |» •»« 11/07/93 PR 191 CB PRREGOR EMP • NAME 471688060 474563339 476921819 471840871 475443862 472503991 469526026 475989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 468420832 469087884 474667812 475380151477500666 475444249 477463877 388625358 471569863 477647279 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 469723373 480843542 477700023 334506281 477028779 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 470566529 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS, SCOTT W BOSMA. JAMIE L BRINKHAUS, JOHN f CHESWICK, GARY B CORNICK, JAMES L DEMBOUSKI. JAY C ENGLISH III. IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHENICH. DAN T FRITZLER. JOHN M GAFFRON, MICHAEL P GERHARDSON JOHN R GOMAN. DAVID J GREGORY, JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN CAROLE JENSEN. ROONEY W JOHNSON. BRADLEY P KARNITZ, RICKY D KENNEN, JANICE M KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE A KUEHN THOMAS M MABUSTH, JEANNE A MAY, DAVID E MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES NELSON, DAVID D OBERAIQNER. SCOTT Q OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN LYLE E PALMER. GREGORY A QUASI. WAYNE A RATHBUN. BARRY J SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B SKREEN, DALE S STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X thomton mark R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F tomczyk mark W VANG. BRUCE L VEE, LINDA S 500403192 WALTERS, LINDA Q 477881539 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J OPT 31 31 31 12 42 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 35 42 12 42 31 12 93 31 31 31 . 15 15 33 61 31 12 31 35 42 92 33 42 92 92 31 42 93 31 31 31 31 33 12 15 33 YTD CURRENT GROSS GROSS 39384 08 1891 88 23550 10 1014 64 4750 68 276 31 14365 35 565 94 37029 83 1611 68 39910 69 1727 20 40148 56 1821 15 34493 69 1575 70 39546 64 1683 32 36258.77 1568 40 38937 72 1538 08 38885 28 1692 23 33853 56 1473 45 47099 22 2172 43 5042 97 254 oO 30295 03 1173 94 29162 86 1269 28 27243 50 1089 37 13421 10 544 44 22089 67 1135 62 2858 29 103 00 38468 58 1627 22 2367 19 85 02 5809 08 213 52 23331 26 1014 64 49802 65 2167 60 42395 40 1845 22 3451 50 48 00 3247L 82 1368 87 55316 58 2511 84 37873 07 156.41 3213 44 Ill .43 26474 12 1088 71 28434 29 1327 01 33853 50 1473 44 26901 81 1083 29 33365 05 1622 50 27183 49 1083 28 11019 44 765 14 27120 30 1083 29 29162 83 1269.28 47311 98 2059 .20 34978 65 1509 76 36013 60 1679 61 36469 34 1568.40 29162 86 1269.28 24065 34 1138 31 21663 74 708 08 25685 24 1117 92 60.589 *73 «» • -» *v • - f' ^ *• .* . f ! 4. - ; 3 V.- • ^ ^ ^ _ A. • • •- X . . 8 * <)CITY OF ORONO FRI. NOV 5. 1993Check Payee ID.11/05/9312 25 AM ---r<?q: LINDA. . . .loc :Payee Name VOID. TYPED OR-FINCE---Date O4 REVERSED A/P -job: 3005 iJ519--Check Amount Typt Subt CHECK REGISTER Pel To NoteOR027399289GOVERNHT TRAING SERV 10/04/93 90 00 HW TR Hand WrittenOR027400T147CITY OF EDINA 10/01/93 84.00 HW TR Hand WrittenOR027401T170PUMP 4 meter services INC 10/01/93 52.844.75 HW TR Hand WrittenOR027402T054MGCSA10/04/93 15.00 HW TR Hand Written OR 027403 T054 MQCSA 10/05/93 90.00 HW TR Hand Written OR 027404 T006 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 10/07/93 1.339 00 HW TR Hand Written OR 027405 629 POSTMASTER 10/08/93 834.04 HW TR Hand Writ ten OR 027406 T324 MN DARE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 10/11/93 15.00 HW TR Hand Written OR 027407 T213 MENARD CASHWAY LUMBER 10/13/93 254.28 HW TR Hand Written OR 027408 629 POSTMASTER 10/13/93 324 33 HW TR Hand Writ ten OR 027409 T426 THE GARDEN PATCH 10/15/93 159 58 HW TR Hand Written OR 0274U T428 MEcAMED. ROBERT L 10/19/93 50,000.00 HW TR Hand Written OR 027412 628 POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC 10/20/93 7.870 08 HW TR Hand Written OR 027413 397 KUEHN. THOMAS 10/20/93 76.27 HW TR Hand Written OR 027414 T429 RADIO SHACK 10/21/93 26.37 HW TR Hand Written OR 027415 671 SAFE BENEFITS 10/26/93 960.00 HW TR Hand Written OR 027416 1036 MN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 10/26/93 38.04 HW TR Hand Written OR 027417 721 STATE TREASURER 10/29/93 20.00 HW TR Hand Written OR 021410 T427 ORONO GROWERS 10/15/93 50 00 HW TR Hand Written Page 1 ------report Id: CKREQ--- * t V--- ■a a ) o 0 oCITY or ORONO ll/05/fi3FRI. NOV 5. 1993 12:25 AM ---req: LINDA---Checli Payee ID.— locPayee NameSUB T O T A L S: "* Total Void Machine Written Total Void Hand Written Total Machine Written Total Hand Written Total Reversals Total Cancelled Checks SUB TOTAL OR^FiNCE----job'''300PlJ519. . . . .prS3:‘'cK20o'?r07> —-report Id: CKReT-? ‘Dale Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note0.00 Nufflbe r of Checks Processed:0 0.00 Numbe r of Checks Processed:0 0.00 Numbe r of Checks Processed:0 114,890.72 Numbe r of Checks Processed:19 0.00 Numbe r of Checks Processed:0 O.CO Numbe r of Check!Processed;0 114.890.72 W © ’ . f ' ^o •COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Nov 12CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT0,-- 1993/11/10 $4,936 00$4,936.00*1993 02 31 49VENDORCITY COU?<TY CREDIT UNI DESCRIPTION : W/H A TRANSFERRED ACCOUNT 9 9999-2030 INVOICE000550 PO NUM.iPage 1 MANUAL IP0293581993/11/10 $137 18 $137 18*COLONIAL LIFE INS INS W/H 9999-2030 000543 IP O203S9 1993/11/10 $67 77 $67.77*COMMERCIAL LIFE INS INS W/H 9999-2030 000541 IP 029360 1993/11/10 $8,956.86 $8.958.86*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF W/H FED MEDCR FICA 9999-2030 000548 IP 029361 1993/11/10 $2,726.89 $2,726 89*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CITY SHARE FICA MEDC 9999-2C30 000549 IP 029362 1993/11/10 $36.219 15 $36,216 15*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NET PAYROLL TRANSFER 9999-2030 000551 IP 029363 1993/11/10 $1,355.00 $1,355.00*GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 000539 IP 029364 1993/11/10 $146 50 $146 50*HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR MARK THOMTON tC02667 9999-2030 000553 IP 029365 1993/11/10 $164 00 $164 00*HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPOR dale SKREEN 9C02623 9999-2030 000552 IP 029366 1993/11/10 $30 00 $30.00*ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-W/H DEF COMP 9999-2030 000545 IP 029367 1993/11/10 $5 09 $5.09*MINNESOTA BENEFIT INS W/H 9999-2030 000540 • IP 029368 1993/11/10 $2,731.43 $2,731.43*MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVE STATE TAX WITHHELD 9999-2030 000544 • IP 029369 1993/11/10 $100.00 $100.00*MN STATE RETIREMENT-DE W/H DEF COMP 9999-2030 000537 IP 029370 1993/11/10 $111 78 $111 78*PEBSCO/OBRA W/H DEF COMP 9999-2030 000536 IP 029371 1993/11/10 $783 4C $783 46*PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYO W/H DEF COMP 9999-2030 000538 IP 029372 1993/11/10 $54.00 $54.00* PERA LrE INS INS W/H 9999-2030 000547 IP 029373 1993/11/10 S3.507 80 $3,507 80* PERA PERA W/H 9999-2030 000546 IP 029371 iii3/ii/id $21.00 $21.00* UNITED WAY CHARITY W/H 9999-2030 00Q542 IP 0 oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Fri Nov 12 1993 02:31:49CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT I INVOICE PO NUM Page 2 MANUAL SS2.030.91 ?■■>oCOUNCILCHECK REGISTER Thu Nov 18 1993 01 38 22CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT$114 75 $114.(S*VENDORA-1 MINNETONKA RENT DESCRIPTION RENT SEEDER ACCOUNT • 0099-4343 INVOICE PO NUM.001143 P«ge 1 MANUAL OH0293791993/11/22 $1,959.66 $1,959 66*ALLIED MECHANICAL SYST MECHANICAL SYSTEMS F 0480-4520 001174 OH 029380 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $484 00 $640 00 $1,524 00* ARROW INDUSTRIES INC ARROW INDUSTRIES INC CITY HALL INSULATION POLICE BLDG INSULATI 0480-4520 0483-4520 001173 001173 OH OH 029311 1993/11/22 $2,413 12 $2,413 12*BARTON SAND/GRAVEL SAND 0249-4233 001144 OH 029382 1993/11/22 $490 00 $490.00*BENDICKSON. WESLEY PLOWING FRENCH CREEK 0384-4343 001175 OH 029383 1993/11/22 $725.20 $725.20*BITUMINOUS ROADWAY INC •< I TUMI NOUS 0249-4233 066737 OH 029384 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $59.36 $1*>1 65 $241.32 $452.33* BLACKOWIAK & SON BLACKOWIAK & SON BLACKOWIAK & SON TRASH haul TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL 0590-4343 0099-4343 0290-4343 001145 001145 001145 OH OH OH 029385 1993/11/22 $3,147.47 $3,147.47*BLACKOWIAK A SONS BRUSH HAUL 0295-4348 001146 ' OH 029386 1993/11/22 $285 60 $285.60*BUDGET PRINTING PRINT WARNING TICKET 0129-4322 40265 OH Q29387 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $68 03 $16 09 $84 12* CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE LS FLASHER 0569-4324 0249-4324 001154 001154 OH OH 029318 1993/11/22 $60 94 $60 94*cityview plmbg a htg REPAIR FURNACE 0590-4343 15104 OH 029319 1993/11/22 $436.21 $436 21*CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL PART 0569-4232 2967 OH 029390 1993/11/22 $10 Ob $10.00*DIXIE PETRO-CHEM DEMURRAGE 0549-4234 DOI007830 OH 029391 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $327.56 $889 86 $1,217 42* earl F ANDERSON ASSC EARL F ANDERSON ASSC SIGNS SIGNS 0249-4233 0249-4233 00129178 00129092 OH OH 029392 1993/11/22 $38 00 $31.00*EMERGENCY VEHICLE SERV REPLACE VOID CHECK 1 9001-3790 001177 OH 029393 1993/11/22 $25.50 $25 50*FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP POSTAGE 0039-4321 001178 OM o oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Nov 18 1993 01:38:22 Pase 2CHECK NO VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 8 INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL 029394 1993/11/221993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 8138 e«S138.11 8213.02 $10 24 830 36 $29.56 $559.95‘ 0 & K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES Q & K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES 0 4 K SERVICES G A K SERVICES RUGSRUGS UNIFROMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 0099-43430129-43430249-4221 0590-4221 0549-4221 0569-4221 001148001148 001148 001148 001148 OHOH OH OH OH 029395 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $16 96 $19 32 836.28* GAFFRON. MIKE GAFFRON, MIKE MTG EXPENSE MILEAGE 0174-4J82 0174-4381 001180 001180 OH OH 029396 1993/11/22 845 48 845 48* GALLS INC.SPOTLIGHT HANDLES 0179-4232 559579201016 OH 029397 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 830 94 813 06 $9 03 $279 77 $332 80* GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO GENUINE PARTS CO SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0569-4232 0174-4232 0569-4234 0249-4232 001147 001147 001147 001147 OH OH OHOH 029398 1993/11/22 $9,377 50 $9,377 50* GEPHARDT ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL CO 84.15.0480-4520 001179 OH 029399 1993/11/22 $32 46 $32 46* GOLF CAR MIDWEST REPAIR CART 0590-4342 932492 OH 029400 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $199 80 $133 20 $333 00* GOPHER STATE ONECALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL OCT FEE OCT FEE 0569-4306 0549-4308 3100519 3100519 OH OH 029401 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 81.375 36 $271 00 8542 00 8145 68 8271 00 $2,605 04* GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC GROUP HEALTH INC DEC INS DEC INS DEC INS DEC INS DEC INS 0129-4151 059C-4151 0249-4151 0174-4151 0115-4151 1617710 1617710 1617710 1617710 1617710 OH OH OH OH OH 029402 l«>93/ll/22 S32 23 132 23* H 4 L HE SABI PARTS 0249-4232 023826 QH 029403 1993/11/22 $16,140 71 816,140 71* HENN CTY SHERIFF DPT 1993 RADIO LEASE 0129-4330 001149 OH 029404 1993/11/22 $637 41 $637 41* HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED GRASS SEED 0099-4231 S4956 OH 021405 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $100 00 $80 00 1250 00 8430 00* HURST, MARVA HURST. MARVA HURST. MARVA 9/27 MTG 10/5 MTG 9/27, 10/11.AlO/25 M 0174-4306 0290-4306 0039-4306 OCllSl 001181 QCllIl OH OHi OH 1993/11/22 $15 00 INNOVATIVE MICROGRAP microfilm 9001-3500 12433 OR. 1 ¥ 0 o o oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Nov 18 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1993 0138:22VENDORINNOVATIVE MICROGRAP DESCRIPTION MICROF II M ACCOUNT • 9J01-3500 INVOICE12432 PO NUM Page 3 MANUAL OH029406029407029408 029409 029411 029412 029413 020414 029415 029416 029417 029418 029419 029420 029421 1993/11/221993/11/221993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $22$37$61$61$32.768 $32,768 $381 $381 5050*7272*1010* 27 27* $426 00 $426 CO* $60 30 $60.30* $29.80 $2.04 $31.84* $j^ .£*66.49 $32.966 49* $317 50 $317.50* $120 00 $120.00* $2,218.10 $2,218.10* fl3 $372 $71 $23 $481 61 48 94 55 58* $30 00 $1,288.80 $1,318 80* $417 $146 $542 $146 $1,253 91 90 02 90 73 INTERSTATE BATTERIES BATTERYJ 4 F CONSTRUCTION SALT STORAGE BLOG 90 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES JEFF-EX KARNIT2. RICK KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE KNUTSON. CHARLOTTE REPAIR UNIFORMS MILEAGE MILEAGE KRAUS ANDERSON CONST REIM EXP FINAL $6,644 53 $6,644 53* KP.EMER 4 DAVIS INC LEROY SIGNS INC LMCIT X ALLIED ADJ LONG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR MARTINS NAVARRE 66 MARTINS NAVARRE 66 MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MED CTR HEALTH CARE MET-CON METRO INC WATERPROOFING FINAL SIGNS FINAL REFUNBD EXCESS COLL- PART PART PARTS PARTS REPAIRS REPAIRS DEC INS DEC INS DEC INS DEC INS PW BLDG ERECTION FI 0249-42320484-4520 0099-4232 0249-4342 0129-4221 0069-4381 0569-4381 0480-4399 0484-4520 0480-4520 9674-3790 0249-4232 0249-4232 0249-4232 0249-4232 0129-4341 0129-4341 0249-4151 0129-4151 0174-4151 0069-4151 0484-4520 108439001182 001151 001150 001153 001152 001152 001184 001185 001187 001186 177829 178144 177687 177920 001158 001159 001192 001192 0011S2 001192 001188 OHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH §3 OHl OHI OH OH oCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Nov IS CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1993/11/22 1993 01:38:22 VENDORMETRO AREA MQMT ASSN Page 4DESCRIPTIONACCOUNT 8 INVOICE PO NUM.MANUALHTQ0039-4356 001157 OH OCT SAC FEE 9001-2226 001160 OH DEC FEE 9673-1282 51481293 OH ASPHALT 0249-4233 001155 OHIPARKING LOT PAVING F 0480-4511 001191 m OFFICE SUPPLIES 0129-4210 656288 OHOFFICE SUPPLIES 0174-4210 656288 S! OH OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 0249-4210 0059-4210 656288 656288OFFICE SUPPLIES 0069-«210 656288 'OHIOFFICE SUPPLIES 0039-4210 656288 OH PURCHASE ORDERS 00E9-4322 1458 QH CJDN CHARGES 0)29-4355 9303205 OHlCJDN CHARGES 0x29-4355 9303204 OH LOCKERS ALL BLDGS FI 0480-4520 001189 OH DEMURRAGE 0129-4232 RI11930939 OHDEMURRAGE0249-4232 RI11930938 OHj DRYWALL ALL BLDGS FI 0^80-4520 001190 Oh SPRINKLER C 0 82 0480-4520 001193 OH SUPPLIES 0590-4232 001161 OHSUPPLIES0129-4232 001161 OHSUPPLIES0290-4231 001161 OH SUPPLIES 0249-4232 001161 OHSUPPLIES0569-4232 001161 OHSUPPLIES0549-4231 00.161 OHSUPPLIES0549-4234 oriiei OHSUPPLIES0290-4232 G01161 OH REFUND CIO LICENSE 1 1001-3790 001195 OH 029422 029423 029424 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 029425 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 029426 029427 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 029428 Q29429 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 Q29430 029431 029432 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 029431 029434 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $11.00 111 00* 13.712 50 53.712 50* $21,629 00 $21,629.00* $191 43 $15,781.50 $15,979 93* $46.63 $24.86 $18 $18 $18 $18 $145 55 56 55 56 71* $167 33 $167.33* $360 00 $150 00 $510 00* $784.10 $784 10* $13 50 $31 50 $45.00* $16,911.00 $16,911 00* $138 00 $138 00* $25 $14 $5 $27 $5 $27 $3 $1 $110 79 15 01 26 52 77 50 94 94* $15 00 $15 00* METRO WASTE MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD MN DEPT PUB SAFETY MN DEPT PUB SAFETY MODERN BIN EQUIP CO MPLS OXYGEN CO MPLS OXYGEN CO MULCAHV INC NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWAREHARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE NAVARRE lANCS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Thu Nov 18 181 01:38:22 Ragt SCHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 1 INVOICE PO NUM. MANUAL1993/11/22 165 18 NORTHERN HYDRAUOLICS TARP 0099-4231 184475TI OH029435$65 18*1993/11/22 $3,368 00 NORTHSIDE CONS INC RETAINAGE CARPENTRY 0480-4520 001194 OH 029436 $3,368 00* 1993/11/22 $231 32 NSP UTILITIES 0569-4324 001162 OH 1993/11/22 $87 82 NSP UTILITIES 0249-4324 001162 OH 029437 $319 14* 1993/11/22 $60.48 OMAN/LYLE MILEAGE 0174-4381 001196 OH 029431 $60.48* 1993/11/22 $2,793.18 ORONO SCHOOL OIST 278 1993 SUMMER REC 0290-4357 001164 OH 029439 62.793.18* 1993/11/22 '*26.50 ORONO SELF SERVICE GASOLINE 0129-4220 001163 OH 1993/11/22 $57.41 ORONO SELF SERVICE GASOLINE 0249-4220 001163 OH 029440 $83.91* 1993/11/22 $13.79 OTTEN BROS BONE MEAL 0590-4231 80372 OH 029441 $13 79* 1993/11/22 $12 00 PFRA INS DEC INS 0129-41S2 001165 OH 029442 $12 00* 1993/11/22 $66.3S PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIR TRAILER 0290-4342 12063 1993/11/22 $37.28 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR REPAIR 0129-4341 3823 OH 029443 $103.63* 1993/11/22 $5,532 OC PLYMOUTH r^OOFING & INS ROOT CRYSTAL BAY PO 0299-4900 rnii97 OH 029444 $5,532 00* 1993/11/22 $542 50 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL CONSULTING SEP 0840-430.^311022 OH 1993/11/22 $1.390 38 POPHAH MAIh A ASSOC LEQAL-DEPT REORGANIZ 0129-4303 381022 OH 1993/11/22 $451 80 POFHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL CONSULTING SEP 0401-4303 381022 OM 1993/11/22 $2,015 80 POPHAM HAIK ^ ASSOC LEGAL CONSULTING SEP 0080-4303 381022 OM 1993/11/22 $1 . 157 07 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL RETAINER SEPT 0080-4301 311022 OH 1993/11/22 $312.16 POPHAH HAIK A ASSOC LEGAL HWV 12 MEDIATI 0080-4303 381022 OH 029445 $5,869.71* 029446 1993/11/22 $1,350.00 $l.350 00* PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS I SEED FRENCH LK PK 0384-4343 001167 CM 1993/11/22 $4,632.37 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PIRA 10/25-11/7 9999-2031 001166 CM 029447 $4,632.37* 1993/11/22 $29 92 RIT2 CAMERA FILM PROC 0129-4210 3763493 OHI 1029441 1993/11/22 $8 79 $31 71* PITZ CAMERA FILM PROC 0174-4210 3764459 OH 1993/11/22 $6,014 00 ROLF E ERICKSON DEC FEE 0059-4307 001176 m o O OCOUNCILCHECK REGISTER Thu Nov 18 .'993 01:38:22 Page 6CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT i INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL0294491993/11/22 $20.88 56,034 88*ROLE t ERICKSON PHOTOS & riLM 0059-4210 001176 OH 0294S0 1993/U/22 512 78 512.78* RONNIES NAVARRE DRYCLE CLEAN BLANKET 0129-4232 5973 OH Q29451 1993/11/22 55,055.50 $5,055 50* SCHOENING EXCAVATING HIGHWOOD RD 0249-4233 001203 OH 021492 1993/11/22 596.47 $96 47* SMEAL FIRE EQUIP CO IN BOOTS 0249-4221 147099 OH 029459 1993/11/22 $5,169.30 $5,169 30* ST PAUL LINOLEUM/CARPE FLOOR COVERING FINAL 0480-4520 001199 OH 029454 1993/11/22 $177.92 5177.92* STATE OF MINNESOTA FIRE CODE BOOKS 0174-4240 001156 OHJ 029455 1993/11/22 $27,473 29 527,473 29* S7EENBURG-WATRU0 INC CONCRETE WORK FINAL 0480-4520 001200 OH e:9454 1993/11/22 518,843.60 518,843.60* STEININGER CONST CO SITE EARTH WORK/GRAO 0480-4520 001198 OH 029457 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 $56.17 5319 50 529 37 5405.04* STRETCHERS STRETCHERS STRtICHERS UNIFORM AMMO BATTERY 0129-4221 0129-4232 0174-4210 72866.1 74513.1 74614.1 OH 01 OH 029451 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 5910.58 5607,05 8539.04 52,056 67* SUBURBAN TIRE INC SUBURBAN TIRE INC SUBURBAN TIRE INC TIRES TIRES TIRES 0129-4341 0129-4341 0249-4232 044114 044273 044754 OH OH OH 029459 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 81 .951 00 51.041 SO $2,892 50* SWANSON A YOUNGDALE IN SWANSON & YOUNGDALE IN PAINTING FINAL PAINTING FINAL 0480-4520 0484-4520 C01201 001201 iOW OH 029480 1993/11/22 8963 83 8963 S3* TOWN A country NOV CLEANING 0099-4349 001161 OH 029441 1993/11/22 5262 00 8262 00* TRI-K SPORTS DIRT 0590-4343 1756 OH 02S4C2 1993/11/2: 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 5140 00 $70 00 $32 00 5242 00* U or MINNESOTA U or MINNESOTA U or MINNESOTA CONF/WECKMAN CONF/GAFFRON MANUAL 0174-4356 0174-4356 0174-4240 001170 001170 001170 OH OH ON 1193/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 1993/11/22 554 18 561 88 81.004 46 5149 98 US WEST COMMON US WEST COMMON US WEST C0W1UN US WEST COW>tUN TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA LINE DATA PROC 1-11/93 0549-4320 C549-4320 0480-4560 0549-4355 001169 001205 C01206 001206 OH • OH OM OH CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR0294631993/11/221993/11/221993/11/221993/11/22 S499 95 $349 96 $499 95 $499 95 $3,122 31*US WEST US WEST US WEST US WEST COMMONCOMMUNCOMMONCOMMUN0294641993/11/22 $5,444.00$5,444.00*VOHNOUTKA ROOFING0294651993/J1/22 $290.00$290.00*W. L. HALL COMPANY0294661993/11/221993/11/22 $28.72$3.92$32.64*WALTERSWALTERS LINDALINDA0294671993/11/22 S231.11 $231.11*WARNING LITES OF M0294681993/11/22 $80.08$80.08*WECKMAN STEPHEN0294101993/11/12 $285,922.172,150.50 JANSCO CAULKING M •Cl .-«• < -I - - \i v ’’*^.t' a *'*/i-i i /• »y^ ^ •-.4 «-rr l'^\I0H »S'-J V4 !L> i 'a #1)' hX 1"" *«i o ^ ■ s S tV'-A ; t7 ^:? a C? V»>'4 zJ ■aa» r 4 I g - i:^ ^ <=21=2^ c^iJ,iri* <==> COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1S33 CITYOFORONO \ PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED V YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/93PERMIT TYPEBuildinaSQL FAMILY-NEWSF-ADD/REMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COHHERCIAL-NEW COM-AOD/REMOOEL COM-ACC STRUCTUR DEMO INSTITUTION-NEW INST-ADD/REMOOEL INST-ACC STRUCT SF-LAND ALT INSf-LANO ALT PLAN REVIEW ONLY DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAQES Sub-total OTY33196 23 10 0 f, 0 1 0 4 1 1 1 1 13 17 305* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1REQUESTER: LIN-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/93 - 10/31/93 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/92 - 10/31/92BASE FEE3946 3 077199 068 . 530. 0 234 0 30. 0 2.740 330 126 0 0 455 3.299 96,989 5000 50 00 00 00 00 .00 .00 00 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 50 .50* VALUATION0.075.024.00 8.815.901.44 300.715.00 0.00 0.00 12.308 00 0 00 0 00 0.00 523.800 00 37.000 00 10.245 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 472.600.00 19,248.193.44* PLAN REVIEW25.887 98 25.060 55 1.932 79 0 00 0 00 111 15 0 00 0 00 0 00 1,409 21 214 50 81 90 0.00 984 43 0.00 2.095 93 57.778 44* QTY2017720 7 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 5 16 252* BASE FEE28281099 929 676 349 797 1.103 29 0 4.206 0 0 0 0 15 150 1.755 67,109 000000 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .00 .00 .00 .50 ,00* VALUATION6.410.302.003.747.932.00134.550.00 4,000.00 145.000.00 164.000 1.200 0 PLAN REVIEW 175,891 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0.00 2,000.00 146.350.00 11,931.225.00* 18.20415,6721,078 0 518 0 18 0 2,733 0 0 0 0 15 0 1,121 39,422 .41.56.35 .00 .05:oo .85 .00 .91 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .58 .71* Mac hanlc al HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONOITIONINQ WOOD STOVE/FLUE WOOD COM/ADO-ON FIREPLACE VENTILATION FUEL STORAGE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK UNDEFINED Sub-total 73 10 2 0 43 4 1 5 12 8 1 159* 9.946 92 474.31 65.00 0.00 2,040 29 140.00 639.11 165.00 495.00 557.50 35.00 14.558 13* 692.104.00 31.365.00 3.400.00 0 00 111,987.16 4.100.00 51.129.00 1.000.00 19,952 00 32.279 59 1.900.00 949.216.75^ 0 00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 69 12 2 1 31 5 2 8 5 13 0 148* 3 540 00 375.00 90.00 30.00 1,020.00 150.00 90.00 240.00 150.00 390.00 0.00 6,075.00* 53.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 10.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 77.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* Pluaiblna FIXTURES WATER METER REPLACE METER UNDEFINED Sub-total 110 10 1 2 123" 10,718.42 2.194.00 0.00 70.00 12.982 42* 718.222.55 0.00 0.00 950.00 717.172.55* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00* 86 12 7 2 107“ 8.458 00 2.202.00 0.00 60.00 10.720.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* Stwtr A Watar SEWER CONNECTION 53 1,909 50 0.00 0 00 7 210.00 An nn 0.00 0 00 0.00 0 00WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD A/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEPTIC CONNECTIN 2 14 10 47 1 70.00 1.400.00 550.00 30,750.00 50 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0 00 2 10 32 3 0 t j) u. vu 1.000.00 1.540.00 0.00 0 00 ^n nn w . \J\J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER A WATER UNDEFINED Sub-total 0 6 0 133* 0.00 420 00 0 00 35.149 50* 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00* 1 6 1 62* 360.00 30.00 3.230 00* V 0 w w 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* peImanent/posteo 1 35.00 1.200 00 0 00 7 210 00 3.867 00 0.00 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED ♦YEAR-TO-DATE OREPORT NBR BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/93 A * ft A * DTD IkJTT nrrti^m m m m m Kt K Ml 1 IbSUtD RE PC CITY OF ORONO )KT ft ft ft ft ft PAGE:REQUESTER: LINrangf ______w f« W * V i01/01/93 -10/31/93 01/01/92 -10/31/92PERMIT TYPE PER /FREE STANDQ TEMPORARY Sub-total QTY045*BASE FEE 0.00 125.00 160.00*VALUATION0.000.001.200 00*PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 0 00*QTY1412*BASE FEE 30.00 120.00 360 00*VALUATION 1.000.00 2,500.00 7,367 00*PLAN REVIEW0.000.000.00* Fir* LAWN SPRINKLER FIRE SPRINKLER Sub-tot al 11 1 12* 385.00 48 00 433.00* 0 00 2.400.00 2,400.00* 0 00 31.20 31.20* 16 2 18* 480.00 1.029.00 1.509 00* 0.00 210,230.00 210.230.00* 0.00 668.85 668.85* Utar Oatlnod LAND ALTERATION TREE REMOVAL RETAINING WALLS 11 2 1 600.00 60.00 117.00 0.00 0.00 9.700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 1 0 1,030.00 30 00 0 no 203,000.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0 DOSub-tot al 14*777.00*9.700 00*0.00*20*1.060.00*203,OOo!oO* W a W W 0.00* Qrand-tot al 751*«101,049.55** 20,927,802 74*«S7.809.94**619**90,063.00** 12 .35;.899.00**40,091.56* m PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/93 •• PERMIT FEE REPORT •• CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/93 TO 10/31/93 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/9''•• PERMIT FEE REPORT *• CITY 'F ORONO FROM 01/01/93 TO 10/31/93 BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTlQATiON DEPOSIT SEWER CONNECTION MAIL INMAI IN WATER CONNECTION AOOL PLAN REVIEW PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL 161.049 5S 57,809.64 9.716 50 0 00 12,7S0 00 320 00 0 00 9.485.17 160.051.90 3.531.18 50.00 254.873.59 oPAGE:REQUESTER: LINBUILDINGMECHANICALPLUMBINGSEWER A WATER USER SION FIREbase fee 96.989.50 14.558 13 12.982 42 35,149.50 777 00 180.00 •433.00PLAN REVIEW 57.778.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 •31.20SURCHARGE8.800.Cl 488.43 371 01 45.50 4.85 0.00 6.70Lie. SEARCH FEE 0..'0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00SAC8.250.00 0.00 0.00 4.500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00INVESTIGATION180.00 105.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 35.00DEPOSIT0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00SEWER CONNECTION MAIL INMAI IN 8.574.57 114.651 50 42.40 910.60 3.00WATER CONNECTION 3.531.18AOOL PLAN REVIEW 50.00 PERMIT TOTAL 184.153.70 15.267.71 12.395.83 40,605.60 781.85 160.00 508.90 PAGE: REQUESTER: LIN ' i ^TE USE* 777 00 0 00 4 IS0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00781.15 SION 160.00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ONING 2EMITSS-193 ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATE• PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/03 - 10/31/03iHiTiBASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW BASE FEE160.00 135816415 168*98«*4,880.00 0 00 0.00 1510,750.00 0.00 0.00 392,950.00 0.00 0.00 191,150.00 0.00 0.00 2250.00 0.00 0.00 1975.00 0.00 0.00 0250.00 0.00 0.00 021,205.00*0.00*0.00*76*21,205.00»*0.00**0.00**76**2-1/93 ***•• PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/93 TO 10/31/93 USER 21,205 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,205.00 jgust Sep;ember October132.95 86.45 544.05120.00 75.00 105.0025.00 25.00 25.00277.95 186.45 674.05423857649.68 228.15 0.00210.00 75.00 135.0025.00 25.00 25.00884.68 328.15 160.002201459 PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED OCTOBER 1993REPORT NBR BPRMTlSS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/93PERMIT TYPEBuilding SQL FAMILY-NEWSF-AOD/REMOOEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE OEMO/PRINCIPAL INST-ADD/RCMOOEL DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/QARAQES Sub-totalMechanical HEATING SYSTEMS FIREPLACE VENTILATTON FUEL STORAGE DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-totalPlumbing FIXTURES WATER METER REPLACE METER Sub-totalSewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD A/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEPTIC CONNECTIN SEWER A WATER Sub-total SignRmanent/postedPE temporary Sub-total Fire LAWN SPRINKLER FIRE SPRINKLER Sub-tot al User Defined LAND alteration Sub-total Qrand-tet al QTYir • * PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RANGE - 10/01/93 - 10/31/93BASE FEE11.226 00 3,718.50357.00100.00 63.000.00405.0015.869.50*1,219.07218.7570.000.00105.0070.001.682.82*971.88235.000.001,206.88* 275.00 700.00 150.00 3,750.00 50.00 70.00 4,995.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 105.00 48.00 153.00* 100.00 100 00* VALUATION953,500 00 357.106.00 32.000.00 0.00 3,200.00 0.00 32.000.00 377.806.00*00.936 00 10,200.00 1,100.00 0.00 2,500 00 1,929.59 106,665.59*69.950.000.000.0069.950.00* 0 00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 2,400.00 2.400.00* 0.00 0.00* 24.007.20** 3,556.821.SO** PLAN REVIEW0.000.000.000.00* 0.00 0 . oo 0.00* 0 00 31.20 31.20* 0.00 0 00* 9.735 41** * ** A*QTY • • PAGE;REQUESTER: LIN-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 10/01/92 - 10/31/92BASE FEE1,786 50 5.432 0056.00 0.00 0.0030.00 114.CO7.418.50*465.0060.0030.0030.000.000.00585.00*1,166.00 0.00 0.001,166.00* 90. CO 200.00 200.00 60.00 30.00 90.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 300.00 300 00* VALUATION344.800.00768.077.002.250.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.500.00 1,122,627.00*0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*0.000.000.000.00* 0.000.00 0 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 00 0.00* 10,109 50** 1.122,627 00*« PLAN REVIEW1.161.232.9r3.1136.400.000.000.0064.354,235.09*0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00*0.000.000.000.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 4.23S.09** PEPORT N DATE OFbase FEE plan REV SURCHARG I-IC. SEA SACINVESTIG)depositmail inSEWER CCPERMIT 1REPORT NBI DATE OF Rl BASE Fee PLAN REV SURCHARG Lie. SEA SAC IN-ZESTIO/ DEPOSIT mail in SEWER CO PERMIT T ’’4 c PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED r ^OCTOBER 19S3REPORT NBR BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/93 BUILDING MECHANICAL •• PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/93 TO 10/31/93PLUMBING SEWER & WATER USER 0PAGE: 37REQUESTER: LINSIGNFIREBASE FEE fPLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN SEWER CONNECTION PERMIT TOTAL 15.869.509.704.211,650.830.00 2.250.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 29,669.54 1,682.820.0054.540.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 1,754 16 1.206.88 0.00 35 48 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1,245.36 4.9S5.00 J.OO 4.50 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 153.0031.202.700.00 0.00 35.00 O.'OO 5,003.50 100.00 0.00 221.90 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTi-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/93 REPORT TOTAL •• PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 10/01/93 TO 10/31/93 PAGE;REQUESTER: LIN BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN SEWER connection PERMIT total 24,007.20 9,735.41 1,752.0i 0 00 2.250 00 35 00 0 00 19.80 225 00 38,024.46 • CTUE. NOV 2, lflB3. 2:57 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1993......................... ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM PACE 1VALUATION 4SC 01010101 01 01 02 02 02 0304 04 05 05 05 06 09 06 06 06 09 10 11 11 11 11 11 15 16 16 tf— 20 24 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 30 46C 01 01 01 19 4C 160521752009 1153 550 3459 4080 3565 1490 3249 222 920 801 1300 60 1375 1186 1770 4051 801 2520 2665 1000 2377 1978 485 475 1180 3085 685 2730 2765 760 503 1305 1160 105 2805 430 2248 1910 1100 2112 3685 2865 85 2109 770 WEAR LA N NORTH STREAM RD FERNDALE GREEN SUQARWOOD DR LOMA LINDA AVE LONG LAKE RD E NORTH SHORE DR DAHL RD 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE BLVD CASCO CIR BEDERWOOO DR FOREST ARMS LA TONKAWA RD LOMA LINDA AVE CYGNET PL CHERRY PL WILDHURST TR WEST FARM RD HIQHWOOD RD TONKAWA RD CASCO POINT RD CASCO POINT RD LOMA LINDA AVE SHADYWOOO RD SHADYWOOO RD ORONO ORCHARD RD S OXFORD RD TONKAWA RD WATERTOWN RD -CASCO eiR OLD CRYSTAL BAY SILVER VIEW DR FOX ST BROWN RD S FERNDALE RD N SHORELINE DR NORTH ARM DR CYGNET PL CASCO POINT RD WAKEFIELD RD SHADYWOOD RD HERITAGE DR KNOLL MANOR RD SUGARWOOD DR WATERTOWN RD P3/10/1293/10/1393/10/1593/10/13 93/10/13 93/10/26 93/10/29 93/10/21 93/10/29 93/10/27 93/10/21 93/10/21 93/10/14 93/10/07 93/10/25 93/10/13 93/10/11 93/10/20 93/10/20 93/10/22 93/10/27 93/10/17 93/10/05 93/10/05 93/10/12 93/10/15 93/10/28 93/10/01 93/10/21 93/10/19 RD N 93/10/19 93/10/21 93/10/05 93/10/08 93/10/07 93/10/06 93/10/12 93/10/12 93/10/18 93/10/19 93/10/19 93/10/20 93/10/22 93/10/25 93/10/29 93/10/19 OR-005581 OR-005582 OR-005597 OR-005605 OR-005613 OR-005665 OR-005607 OR-005623 OR-005686 OR-005676 OR-005627 OR-005658 OR-005559 OR-005568 Oft-005866 OR-005524 OR-005598 OR-005628 OR-005645 OR-005663 OR-005670 OR-005518 OR-005577 OR-005579 OR-005604 OR-005819 OR-005678 OR 005567 OR-005594 OR-005642 'OR"005643r OR-005644 OR-C35569 OR-005560 OR-005565 OR-005575 OR-005601 OR-005602 OR-005629 OR-005638 OR-005641 OR-005646 OR-005659 OR-005684 OR-005683 OR-005576 NORTH SHORE DR FERNDALE GREEN SUGARWOOD DR 93/10/01 OR-005472 93/10/07 OR-005588 -- - 93/10/07 OR-005589 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 93/10/18 OR-005630 15355225 19358482 19375680 19206996 14944750 19430037 14746579 12347418 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 17216628 19205088 147347 85 15594004 00000000 00000000 19322966 14718390 14700700 14734954 14726539 14512486 00000000 19333536 18669669 00000000 00000000 00000000 VINTAGE BUILDERS INC L CRAMER COSCOTT LARSON HOMES REBERS CONSTRUCTION JOHNSON & JOHNSON BUILDING JOHN KRAEMER & SONS INCFISK KURT COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTA HAUCK ASSOC INC RFPMAN INC DUNDEE LANDSCAPE NURSERY HOMFSTEAD ENT INC ROELOFS CONSTRUCTION INC LAKESIDE POOL AND SPA INC BET2 BUILDERS INC SMITH Wr ROOFING AL S FINISHING INC COTY CONSTRUCTION JEFFERY J. DOYLE & SONS Uuuuuuuu 19723293 14735291 00000000 14722511 1922.^004 15442073 00000000 00000000 19274933 14739291 14721005 00000000 14734232 19375680 00000000 88913535 85539042 85539042 84399491 GARY GABRELCIK CONST CO JOHNSON CONST LEMMERMAN ERNIE ENGLER & ENGLER, INC HUDSON CONSTRUCTION JOHNSON CLARK W FRIEDELL CONST CO DRS HOME REPAIR & REMODEL KINGMAN BUILDING CO scon LARSON HOMES Q P LAWN SPRINKLER SERVICE H20 IRRIGATION H20 IRRIGATION FIRE-GUARD SPRINKLER SUPAALAHOFFMANHOPKINS KILEEN SAMS TAYLOR BOWMAN STARKMAN TIERNEY ANDERSON LUESSE MUELLER MEAKINS MOORE KULENKAMP CURRIER SWANSON RASMUSSEN BRACKEN VONGRIES MOORE FRAHM SHUTTE ULRICH DITTRICH HAENY HAMM FISHER LAUER WIRTJES NASTBLAK— SWANSON ROUX BROWNE SPENCER POPP JENSEN EHALT FROMMELT HENDERSON OWEN BLOCH KINGMAN MERIDETH 226452350 360 165 1,400 50 72 40 10 10 8 13 25 12 2 9 2 16 6 7 19 2 2 2 1 4 000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .500 ,000.000 ,000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000.00 .600.00 .000.00 .000 00 ,000 00 .500.00 .000 00 ,400 ,000 ,000 .500 .000 ,800 .600.00 ,800.00 ,871.00 ,010.00 500.00 .00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5 4 14 2 3 10 10 I 5 15 .200.00 575.00 .000.00 .000.00 .450.00 ,800 00 .000.00 500.00 .000.00 .000.00 .000.00 .000.00 ,000.00 600.00 .000.03 AHLERS .00 .00 .00 2.40Q.00 r*.TUE. NOV 2. 1993. 2 57 PMPERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1993 *•»PAGE 2PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONSTEMPEL1.429.59GRONBERG2.000.00JOHNSON6.500.00 6.800.00VCGT6.500.00 LAUER 500.00THOMAS13.450.00 WAUGH 1.000.00WILLIAMS1.100.00 SWANSON 2.800.00 3,500.00 1.300^0SPENCER500 00SAWICKI500 no ENGLER 600.00 PHELPS 500 00PETERSON2,800.00 PLATOU 1.300 00STEELE1,041 00 MILLIREN 8,475.00FILBRANDT2,545.00HARRINGTON1,800 00CARLSON2.750.00 BERTHIAUME 1,500.00 RYDELL 2,140.00 NADLER 1.535.00 CARLSON 21,300.00 8. 100.00FULLERTON!.>00.00 JACOBS 4.000 00ANDERSON500.00 JOHNSON 6.500 00 12.000 00 BICHANTCH 3.500 00 WILLIAMS 6,500 00SWANSON1,000.00 11.850.00SMOOT00 FISHER 12.400 00 PETERSON 2.I00.0CAAA AA OBERHAUSER soo.ooKINGMAN1.400.00 BORDSON .CO JACKLEY .ICO KIRKPATRICK .00 FISHER .001JOHNSON.00WILLIAMS.OOf FISHER .00 29C uc sw 010101 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 03 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 29 29 29C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 02 -M- 29 29 UC 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 425 110 4575 1075 155 1180 760 4105 350 3229B 507 760 503 4510 3450 1950 1100 1480 3400 3486 3960 4080 550 J035 135 2509 550 3800 3400 1700 3980 4575 4515 332 350 3229B 1135 2665 475 1100 2425 1100 1290 2700 4515 475 4575 350 475 TURNHAM RD LEAF ST WOLVERTON PL MILLSTON RD WlAR LA N TONKAWA RD DICKEY LAKE DR BAYSIDF RD NORTH ARM LA CASCO CIR FERNDALE RD K DICKEY LAKE DR FERNDALE RD N NORTH SHORE DR BIRCH LA FOX RIDGE RD NORTH SHORE DR W GREEN TREES RD WATERTOWN RD IVY PL BAY3IDE RD BAYSIDE RD TONKAWA RD CASCO POINT RD ORONO ORCHARD RD N KELLY AVE TONKAWA RD WAYZATA BLVD FOX ST SHORELINE DR NORTH SHORE DR WOLVERTON PL WOLVERTON PL WESTLAKE ST NORTH ARM LA CASCO CIR HERITAGE LA MAPLERIOGE LA OXFORD RD NORTH SHORE OR W ■ ■■NORTH SMORfc M W DUNWOOOY AVE KNOLL MANOR RD ORONO oaks dr WHITE OAK CIR WOLVERTON PL OXFORD RD WOLVERTON Pl north arm la OXFORD RD 93/10/18 OR 93/10/05 OR 93/10/06 OR 93/10/05 OR 93/10/06 OR 93/10/21 OR 93/10/15 OR 93/10/18 OR 93/10/18 OR 93/10/19 OR 93/10/21 OR 93/10/26 OR 93/10/08 OR 93/10/08 OR 93/10/27 OR 93/10/12 OR 93/10/20 OR 93/10/26 OR 93/10/13 OR 93/10/06 OR 93/10/08 OR 93/10/12 OR 93/10/18 OR 93/10/18 OR 93/10/20 OR 93/10/21 OR 93/10/22 OR 93/10/05 OR 93/10/28 OR 93/10/05 OR 93/10/05 OR 93/10/11 OR 93/10/12 OR 93/10/15 OR 93/10/19 OR 93/10/19 OR 93/10/27 OR 93/10/28 OR 93/10/20 OR 93/10/20 or ■92/10/20 OR 93/10/13 OR 93/10/27 OR 93/10/05 OR 93/10/07 OR 93/10/11 OR 93/10/12 OR 93/10/13 OR 93/10/14 OR 93/10/14 OR 005564'’D5572 Uu:'-83 005584 005586 005591 005620 005634 005635 005640 005656 005674 005590 005593 005596 005608 005652 005673 005614 005585 005592 005599 005622 005633 005653 005657 005662 005574 005682 005571 005573 005600 005609 005622 005636 005637 005675 005679 005649 005650 OOMII 005615 005677 005570 005587 005603 005606 005612 005616 005617 4479259138900758 39351555 39414211 34718272 24461495 36825295 35453797 36332561 25334357 38900758 35595900 39203800 34730450 34718272 39384902 00000000 35378491 34789558 34748366 34730450 00000000 39203800 39296767 39296767 39296767 39203800 34461449 24738793 24733793 29337200 24775536 25465205 00000000 24417085 25334357 29383589 29319676 24432275 00000000oowoooo 00000000 24701208 54791869 54734361 54718151 00000000 54786712 54718151 24738403 STEVENS WELL DRILLING CO HEAT-N-GLO FIREPLACES CLIMATE ENGINEERING KLEVE HTG A AC B4C HEATING INC WIDMER INC VARNER SHEET METAL M H SEIFERT CONST FIRESIDE CORNER PLYMOUTH PLUMBING HEAT-N-QLO FIREPLACES MIDWEST FIREPLACE CO CRONSTROMS HTG A AC INC TRIPLE 0 HTG A AC B&C HEATING INC ALPINE HEATING & COOLING SUPERIOR CONTR INC DITTER INC ABEL HEATING INC TRIPLE D HTG & AC CRONSTROMS HTG A AC INC VOGT FRED A CO VOGT FRED & CO VOGT ERt-D A CO CRONSTROMS HTG A AC INC WATERTOWN SHEET METAL INC CITYVIEW PLBQ A HTG CITYVIEW PLBG i HTG CULLIGAN EASCO PLBG A HTQ GADTKE WM PLBG INC TWO RIVERS PLBQ PLYMOUTH PLUMBING STANDARD PLBG & APPL CO MCGUIRE A SONS PLBG A HTG FORCIER PLBG 4.6 S4UjC STEINKRAUS PLBG INC INGELSIDE ENGINEERING JOHNSON JERRY EXC PEtERSON ELMER J CO QROTH SEWEK A WATER PETERSON ELMER J CO DAY EARL W & SONS UflBnjiKYjj^B^BQVKT:B|iIBE1BEH^B^B31^■TB I• ]H 1 Uk KB1B 1 J^B ul•!^Bu •1 ]H e1 i1•EiKtit •1 M El •1 Bl !^Ksi «1 lH !•1 3^B rVl^^BW'm|1 iBBH1BXB^B Kill rTT^TSi iriT":.’ J PAGE 3CONQKINGTGTGOWNER LAST NM VALUATIONANDERSONBENNET . uu nnMEZZANGAnoVOGT. uuehalt. Qu .00HOFFMANboylan. UUnnrowlette. uu .00 nnWIRTJESHOLMESonTHOMAS. uu nnLARSON* uu nnMEZ2ENGA• uu nnEHALT. uu .00 .00 .00NYHAMMERSUPAALAKINGMAN.00.003.559.621.59*FISHER TUE. NOV 2. 1993, NUMERICAL LISTING PERMIT NBR ISSUED 2 bS PMOCTOBER 1993 CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1WORK ID NUMBER COMPANYg ExistingPrincipal Residence ndonment on Only y Trailer /Remodel y Structure to Lake T Wall Monuments 5val OR-005472OR-005518OR-005524OR-005559OR-005560OR-005564OR-005565OR-005567OR-005568OR-005569OR-005570OR-005571OR-005572OR-005573OR-005574OR-005579OR-005576OR-005577OR-005579ON-005581OR-005582OR-005983OR-005584OR-005585OR-005586OR-005537OR-005588OR-005589OR-OOSS90OR-005591OR-OOS592OR-005593OR-OOS594 OR-005595 OR-005598 OR-005597 OR-005598 OR-005599 OR-005600 OR-005601 OR-OOS602 OR-005603 OR-005804 OR-005805 OR-005606 OR-005607 OR-005608 OR-00S609 OR-005610 OR-005612 0R-0056i3 OR-005614 OR-0O561S OR-0056I6 03/10/01 N 93/10/17 N 93/10/13 N 93/10/14 N 93/10/08 N 93/10/18 N 93/10/07 N 93/10/01 N 93/10/07 N 93/10/05 N 03/10/05 N93/10/05 N93/10/05 N 93/10/05 N 93/10/05 N 93/10/00 N93/10/19 N 93/10/05 N93/10/05 N03/10/12 N93/10/13 N 93/10/06 N 93/10/05 N 93/10/06 N 93/10/06 N 93/10/07 N 93/10/07 N 93/10/07 N 93/10/08 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/08 N 93/10/08 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/18 N 93/10/27 N 93/10/15 N 93/10/11 N 93/10/12 N 93/10/11 N 93/10/12 N 93/10/12 N 93/10/11 N 93/10/12 N 93/10/13 N 93/10/12 Y 93/10/29 N 93/10/12 N 93/10/12 N 93/10/12 N 93/10/13 N 93/10/13 N 93/10/13 N 93/10/13 N 93/10/14 N 28652520609202765425760475801273012901700no3980380050336852685>00016052145751075348615527006521095031180396045101180 1100 3450 75 1375 4080 4575 1305 1160 4515 2377 2009 475 3458 1950 4515 475 4575 1153 3400 2425 350 NORTH SHORE DR CASCO POINT RD CYGNET PL FOREST ARMS LA FOX ST TURNHAM RD BROWN RD S OXFORD RD TONKAWA RD SILVER VIEW DR ORONO OAKS DRSHORELINE DRLEAF STNORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA BLVD FERNDALE RD N WATERTOWN RDCASCO POINT RDLOMA LINDA AVEWEAR LA NNORTH STREAM RD WOLVtPTON PL MILLSTCM RD IVY PL WEAR LA N WHITE OAK CIR FERNDALE GREEN SUQARWOOO DR FERNDALE RD N TONKAWA RD BAYSIDE RD NORTH SHORE DR TONKAWA RD KNOLL MANOR RD BIRCH LA FERNDALE GREEN CHERRY PL BAYSIDE RD WOLVERTON PL SHORELINE DR NORTH ARM DR WOLVERTON PL SHADYWOOO RD SUGARWOOO DR OXFORD RD NORTH SHORE DR FOX RIDGE RD WOLVERTON PL OXFORD RD WOLVERTON PL LOMA LINDA AVE WATERTOWN RD DUMWOOOY AVE NORTH ARM LA 889135351473495415594004172166280000000044792591147225110000000019205088147352915479186924738793389007582933720034461449192230040000000014726539145124861535522519358482393515553941421134748366347182725473436185539042855390423920380024461495347304503473045000000000 00000000 34718272 19375680 00000000 00000000 24775536 15442073 00000000 54718151 00000000 19206996 00000000 14746579 39384902 25465205 15444215 54786712 14944750 34789558 00000000 54718151 G P LAWN SPRINKLER SERVICE BETZ BUILDERS INC DUNDEE LANDSCAPE NURSERY PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTASTEVENS WELL DRILLING CO LEMMERMAN ERNIEHAUCK ASSOC INC JOHNSON CONST INGELSIDE ENGINEERINGCITYVIEW PLBG 4 HTG HEAT-N-GLO FIREPLACES CULLIGANWATERTOWN SHEET METAL INC ENQLER & ENOLER. INCSMITH WF ROOFINGAL’S FINISHING INCVINTAGE BUILDERS INCL CRAMER CO CLIMATE ENGINEERING KLEVE HTQ A AC ABEL HEATING INC BAG HEATING INC JOHNSON JERRY EXC H20 IRRIGATION H20 IRRIGATION CRONSTROMS HTQ A AC INC WIDMER INC TRIPLE D HTG A AC TRIPLE D HTG A AC BAC HEATING INC SCOTT LARSON HOMES EASCO PLBG A HTG HUDSON CONSTRUCTION PETERSON ELMER J CO REBERS CONSTRUCTION FISK KURT ALPINE HEATING A COOLING GADTKE WM PLBG INC GUSTAFSON DALE GROTH SEWER A WATER JOHNSON A JOHNSON BUILDING DITTER INC PETERSON ELMER J CO OWNER LAST NMFRAHMCURRIERMEAKINSROUXSTEMPELBROWNEFISHERMOORESWANSONBORDSONJACOBSGRONBERGANDERSONSPENCERMERIDETHSHUTTEULRICHSUPAALAHOFFMANJOHNSONMILLIRENVOGTJACKLEYAHLERSSPENCERLAUERFILBRANDTSAWICKILAUER KINGMAN ENGLER HOPKINS SWANSON HARRINGTON JOHNSON POPP JENSEN KIRKPATRICK DITTRICH KILEEN FISHER BOWMAN PHELPS FISHER JOHNSON SAMS STEELE OBERHAUSER WILLIAMS VALUATION25..00000.00 500.00 000 00 000.00 429.59 000.00 500.00 000 575 no uo .004.000. 002.000. 00 500.009.600.004.450.004.000. 00 2,800 002,600 00 s.soo.oo2.000. 00 0,500.006.800.008.475.006.500.00 .00 .00 .00500.00500.002.545.00 500.00.00 .00 600 00 0,000 00 9.000. 00 1.800.00 6,500 00 2,800.00 3.000. 00 .00 2,800.00 0,000.00 .00 0.000.00 500.00 2.000. 00 .00 .00 S,000.00 1,041.00 500.00 .00 PAQE 1 •eOWNER LAST nM VALUTIONER SERVICE C NURSERYNNESOTALLING CO FRAHM CURRIER HEAKINS ROUX STEMPEL BRCWNE rISHER MOORE SWANSON BOROSONJACOBS GRONBERQ ANDERSONSPENCER MERIDETHSHUTTCULRICHSUPAALAHOFFMAN JOHNSONMILLIREN VOGT JACKLEYAHLERS SPENCER LAUER FILBRANOT SAWICKI LAUER KINGMAN ENGLER HOPKINS SWANSON HARRINGTON JOHNSON POPP JENSEN KIRKPATRICK DITTRICH KILEEN FISHER BOWMAN PHELPS FISHER WATER JOHNSON ISOM BUILDING SAMS STEELE OBERHAUSERt j CO williams [ERINGHTGPLACESMETAL INC . INCaINC S INCRINGCxca AC INCACAC3!«S TG CTION J CO CTION a COOLING INC .0019.000. 002.500.0013.000. 005.000. 00 1,429.594.000. 00 500.0025.000. 00 575iOO.004.000.002.000.00500.009.600.0014.450.0024.000. 002.500.002.600.00 226.500.00452,000.006.500.008.800.008.475.006.500.00 .00 .00 .00500.00 500.OC2.545.00 500.00.00.00600 00350.000 009.000. 001.800.00 6.500 00 2,800.00 3.000. 00 .00 2,800.00 360.000. 00 .00 50.000. 00 500.00 12.000. 00 .00 .00 185.000.00 1.041.00 500.00 .00 TUE, NOV 2. 1993, 2:55 PMNUMERICAL LISTING OCTOBER 1993 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR N8R STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANYOR-005617OR-005618OR-005619OR-005620OR-005621OR-005622OR-005623OR-005627OR-005628OR-005G29OR-005630OR-005832OR-005633OR-005634OR-005635OR-005636OR-OOS637OR-005638OR-005840OR-005641OR-005642OR-005643OR-005644OR-005645OR-005646OR-005647OR-005648OR-005649OR-005650OR-005851OR-005852OR-005653OR-005654 OR-005655 OR-O05658 OR-005657 OR-005658 OR-OOS6SO OR-005660 OR-005661 OR-005662 OR-005663 OR-005664 OR-005665 OR-005668 OR-005667 OR-005868 OR-005669 OR-005670 OR-005672 OR-00567J OR-005674 OR-005675 OR-005676 93/10/14 N 93/10/14 N 93/10/15 N 93/10/15 N 93/10/15 N 93/10/15 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/20 N 93/10/18 N 93/10/18 N 93/10/18 N 93/10/18 N 93/10/18 N 93/10/18 N 93/10/19 N 93/10/19 N 93/10/19 N 93/10/19 N 93/10/19 N 93/10/19 N 93/10/19 Y 93/10/21 N 93/10/20 N 93/10/20 N 93/10/20 N 93/10/20 N 93/10/20 N 93/10/20 N 93/10/20 Y 93/10/20 N 93/10/20 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/21 N 93/10/22 N 93/10/22 N 93/10/22 N 93/10/22 N 93/10/22 N 93/10/25 N 93/10/26 N 93/10/25 N 93/10/25 N 93/10/25 N 93/10/26 N 93/10/27 N 93/10/26 N 93/10/26 N 93/10/26 N 93/10/27 N 93/10/27 N 475 OXFORD RD1490 LONG LAKE BLVD1978 SHADYWOOD RD760 DICKEY LAKE DR315 TONKAWA RD332 WESTLAKE ST4080 DAHL RD3249 CASCO CIR1186 WILDHURST TR105 CYGNET PL770 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD550 TONKAWA RD3035 CASCO POINT RD4105 BAYSIDE RD350 NORTH ARM LA350 NORTH ARM LA3229B CASCO CIR2805 CASCO POINT RD3229B CASCO CIR430 WAKEFIELD RD3085 WATERTOWN RD3237 CASCO CIR685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD1770 WEST FARM RD2248 SHADYWOOD RD3895 BAYSIDE RD155 WEAR LA N475 OXFORD RD1100 NORTH SHORE DR W1100 NORTH SHORE DR W1100 NORTH SHORE DR W135 ORONO ORCHARD RD N105 CYGNET PL 1135 HERITAGE LA 507 FERNOALE RD N 2509 KELLY AVE 222 BEDERWOOD DR 1910 HERITAGE DR 3240 BAYSIDE RD 3775 BAYSIDE RD 550 TONKAWA RD 4051 HIGHWOOO RD 1100 KNOLL MANOR RD 550 LONG LAKE RD E 1300 LOMA LINDA AVE 3237 CASCO CIR 525 TONKAWA RD 760 DICKEY LAKE DR 801 TONKAWA RD 75 FERNDALE GREEN 1480 GREEN TREES RD 760 DICKEY LAKE DR 1135 HERITAGE LA 1490 LONG LAKE BLVD 01 2473840J 01 54775649 11 19333536 01 3682529501 24722316 01 0000000002 12347418 04 00000000 06 00000000 29 0000000019 84399491 24 39203800 24 39296767 01 35453797 01 36332561 01 24417085 01 25334357 29 19274933 01 25334357 29 14739291 16 00000000 17 0000000020 19723293 06 1932296628 14721005 01 0000000001 5471815102 24432275 02 COOOOOOO 02 00000000 02 00000000 24 39296767 01 00000000 01 54775077 01 38900758 24 39296767 04 00000000 29 00000000 01 00000000 01 00000000 24 39203800 06 14718390 29 14734232 01 19430037 05 14734785 01 24722316 01 24722316 01 54791869 09 14700700 OJ 25334357 02 35378491 01 35595900 01 29383589 03 00000000 DAY EARL W & SONS RITTER EXCAVATING COTY CONSTRUCTION VARNER SHEET METAL COPPIN PLBGCOUNTRY CUSTOM HOMESFIRE-GUARD SPRINKLER CRONSTROMS HTG & AC INC VOGT FRED & CO M H SEIFERT CONST FIRESIDE CORNER TWO RIVERS PLBG PLYMOUTH PLUMBING JOHNSON CLARK W PLYMOUTH PLUMBING FRIEDELL CONST COGARY GABRELCIK CONST COHOMESTEAD ENT INCDRS HOME REPAIR & REMODELPETERSON ELMER J CO FORCIER PLBGVOGT FRED 4 CO OUICKWAY EXCAVATING HEAT-N-GLO FIREPLACES VOGT FRED 4 CO CRONSTROMS HTG 4 AC INC ROELOF'S CONSTRUCTION INC KINGMAN BUILDING CO JOHN KRAEMER 4 SONS INC REPMAN INC COPPIN PLBG COPPIN PLBG INGELSIDE ENGINEERING LAKESID*' POOL AND SPA INC PLYMOUTH Plumbing SUPERIOR CONTR INC MIDWEST fireplace CO STANDARD PLBG 4 APPL CO OWNER LAST NM oPAGE 2 VALUATIONFISHER .00ANDERSON.00HAENY1,871.00THOMAS13,450.00BENNET.00BICHANICH3.500.00STARKMAN72.000.00LUESSE10,000.00RASMUSSEN2,400.00EHALT500 00 2,400.00CARLSON2.750.00BERTHIAUME1,500.00WAUGH1,000.00WILLIAMS1,100.00WILLIAMS8,500.00SWANSON1.000 00FROMMELT10.000 00SWANSON2,800.00HENDERSON10,000.00WIRTJES.00NASIDLAK.003,200 00BRACKEN16,000.00OWEN8,000.00MEZZANGA.00VOGT.00FISHER12,400.00PETERSON2,800.00PETERSON2,800.00PETERSON2.800.00RYDELL2,140.00EHALT.00 HOFFMAN .00 3,500.00 NADLER 1,535.00 MUELLER 8,600.00 BLOCH 5,000.00BOYLAN.00 ROWLETTE .00CARLSON21,000.00 VONQRIES 6,000.00 KINGMAN 15,000.00 TAYLOR 1,400.000,00 KULENKAMP 12,000.00 WIRTJES .00 HOLMES .00 THOMAS .00 MOORE 7,500.00 LARSON .00 PLATOU 1,300.00 1,300.00 18,850.00 ANDERSON 10,600.00 t r R INCr CO[MODELINC »M INCINC A INC PAGE 3OWNER LAST NM VALUATION)NS I HTG KINGMANHAMMSMOOTMEZZENQAEHALTFULLERTONSUPAALA NYHAMMER TIERNEY 1.400.004.010.00 .00 .00 .001.200.00 600.00.00.0040.000.00 . • ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTEDVw.-.' . ^OCTOBER 1993REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/93 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO * • * » *PAGE: 1REQUESTER: LIN-- CURRENT RANGE - 10/01/93 - 10/31/93 -- PREVIOUS RANGE 10/01/92 - 10/31/92PERMIT TYPE User Defined QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWSUBDIVISIONVARIANCECUPSKETCH PLAN Sub-total 06219*0.00975.00350.00300.00 1,625.00*o o o o oo o o o oo o o o o«o o o o oo o o o oo o o o o34 3 010*675.00700.00600.00 0.001.975.00*o o o o oo o o o oo o o o o0.000.000.000.000.00*Grand-total 9**1,625.00**0.00*•0.00**10^*1.975.00**o.oo**0.00** t REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 11/02/93BASE FEE USER1,625.00 REPORT TOTAL 1.625.00PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00SURCHARGE0.00 0.00Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 1.625.00 1,625.00 •• PERMIT FEE REPORT ••CITY OF ORONOFROM 10/01/93 TO 10/31/93 PAGE:REQUESTER: LIN I ^ .rj, /. . » TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administratcr John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director November 17. 1993 SUBJECT: Underground Tank Removal - Soils Repon As a result of an analysis of the soils under and near the underground tanks at the old City office site, we have been advised of the following: 1. The contamination does not appear to go any deeper than we have dug so far. 2. An additional six soil borings will be done to determine how broad the contaminated soils are from the location ot the unleaded tank and one diesel tank. 3. The six additional soil borings will be done on November 22nd or 23rd. I hope to have an up-to-date cost report to hand deliver at the November 22, 1993 Council meeting. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Board of Directors Workshop Agenda 9:00 am, Saturday, November 20, 1993 Norwest Bank Bldg. Conference Rm. 135 900 E. Way-ata Blvd., Wayzata (Handicapped Access, Wayzata Blvd West Entry) IJCV 1 6 9:00 am Call to order. Chair Bill Johnstone Roll call Statement of meeting purpose and agenda review 9:05 am Funding Alternatives: A. Watercraft registration fee: 1) Revenue potential: * watercraft registered in metro region * watercraft ” " state (see attached projection outline) 2) Discussion of how revenue would be allocated among organizations responsible for lake management in the region or state B. Involvement of cities, agencies, lake/sport organizations and legislators in supporting a watercraft registration fee for lake improvement and management programs. Pee Study Subcommittee evaluations to date; Standing Committee Priorities, Chair Johnstone: A. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Tom Penn 9:30 am 9:45 am 9:46 am 10:00 am B. Lake Use and Recreation, Chair Bert Foster 10:20 am Break . . . 10:30 am C. Lake Access, Chair Jim Grathwol 10:45 am D. Water Structures, Chair Doug Babcock 11:05 am Environment objectives. Chair Bob Rascop: A. Review of Manage*.ient Plan Environment objectives B. Consultant's work plan, initial Phase Two and through 1994 program year C. Recoiraaendations in support of or changes to current direction, consultant's service Board of Directors Workshop, Agenda. 11/20/93, P. 2 11:30 am Communication and public education strategies: A. Examine existing and proposed communications: 1) City councils/public officials 2) Cooperating agencies: * MCWD MN DNR Hennepin County Board and administration Hennepin County Sheriff and Water Patrol Hennepin Parks Board Henn Conservation District Carver County; MN PCA MN PCA * * * A * * * 3) Lake and sports organizations: * LMLOA MN Sportsfishing Congress MN Lakes Assn. MN United Snowmobilers Assn & loca, snowmobi1e/recreation vehicle clubs A * * B. Board involvement, recommendations; C. Staff involvement/support, recommendations; 12:00 pm Adjourn LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT EXAMPLES OF POTENTIAL FOR FUND RAISING THROUGH METRO AREA BOAT STICKER BOAT REGISTRATION IN SEVEN COUNTY METRO AREA - FROM DNR REPORTS OF 11/1/93COUNTYNUMBER OF % OF BOATS REG.% OF BOATS REG.§ Of BOATS USED IN EACH t OF BOATS USED IN HENNEF1N \REGISTERED BOATS IN 7 CO. AREA IN STATE COUNTY FROM 7 CO AREA*COUNTY FROM THE 7 COUNTIES*ANOKA 37,101 12.54%5.10%20,989 1,671 CARVER 7,902 2.67%1.09%6,052 1,154 DAKOTA 34,646 11.71%4.76%21,086 488 HENNEPIN 124,553 42.11%17.12%70,862 65,780 RAMSEY 61,092 20.66%8.40%32,297 5’2 SCOTT 8,307 2.81%1.14%6,217 431 WASHINGTON 22,165 7.49%3.05%16,444 826 TOTAL 295,766 100.00%40.65%173,947 70,862 *Th# mtmbm of boots usod doos not oquol mo numbor of boots rogistofod bocouso mony ofo usod outstdo tho 7 county motro orsa Also, 8B.5% of boot ownofs onsworod tho quostion on uit by county. TOTAL NUMBER OF BOATS % OF BOATS REG IN STATE % OF BOATS REG IN STATE PXGISTERCO IN STATE USm IN 7 CO AREA lAKES USED IN HtNN CO lAKlS STATE TOTAL 727,634 28.33%11.44% s Examples of income generation from a 7-County Area Registration Fee. Examples of fees for 3-year repistration Boats registered in 7 county^area Total amount generated for 3 years. Annual funding from 3-year registration fee Amount allocated to Hennepin Co at 42% Based on $6 fee 295,766 $1,774,5916.00 $591,532.00 $248,443.44 y i Based on $9 fee 295,766 $2,661,894.00 $887,298.00 $372,665.16 Based on $ 12 fee 295,766 $3,549,192.00 $1,183,064.00 $496,886.88 295,766 $4,436,490.00 $1,478,830.00 $621,108.60 Examples of income generated from a state wide registration lee. E^xamples of fees for 3-year registration Boats registered in state fotai amount generated. Annual funding from 3:year registration fee_ Amount allocated to _Henriepin Co at 17% Based on $6 fee 727,634 $4,365,804.00 $1,455,268.00 _______$247,395.56 Jtosed on Id fee 727,634 $6,548,706.00 $2,182,902.00 ________$371,093.34 Based on 112 fee 727,634_____$8,731,608.00 $2,910,536.00 $494,791.12 Based on $ 15 fee 727,634 $10,914,510 00 $3,638,170 00 _________$618,488.90 lOTUh MiTHOUVC WKJ M/IS'aa LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 11/12/93 to: from: SUBJECT: Board of Directors Subcommittee Chair Scott Carlson Executive Director Gene Strommen Summation of 1993 Fee Study Subcommittee Discussion and Items Under Consideration for Board Evaluation Five meetings of the Fee Study Subcommittee were held: January 21, March 9, April 13, June 8 and August 3, 1993. Discussion and recommendations by the subcommittee took place as noted per each meeting: January 21. 1993 Meeting, Presentation of Initial Concerns;, 1. The Purpose and Identification of Multiple Dock Related Activities outline (per attachment) of 11/23/92 was accepted with a minor modification in the Statement of Purpose, changing the last sentence of the purpose statement to read: "Multiple dock related activities are recognized as a necessary funcl.;^ CONTRIBUTING FACTOR of the District's RESPONSIBILI'TY in. ordetj to manage and control lake density and lake use issues, [omit under 1ined words, add words in CAPS] 2. Multiple Dock Related Activities (MDRA) Items 1 through 4 were accepted as appropriate cost categories. Items 5 through 8 were subject to further review. 3. Cost data was agreed to be gathered for a full year. Staff presented time data sheets fo*^ the executive director and administrative technician which were accepted. 4. Enforcement costs were proposed to be charged to the multiple dock licensees through use of a bond or deposit. 5. Regulating docks on a basis other than WSU, was proposed, in particular using an "envelope* dock use area (DUA) system. (S. A proposal for cities to conduct multiple dock inspections would require trained staff in each or cities with detailed knowledge of uniform water structure Code provisions. Consensus - LMCD has the professions staff with this competency -*nd should continue in this service. FEE STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE SUMMARY, 11/12/93, p. 2 March 9. 1993 Meeting; 1. Initial staff time study reports accepted. 2.Review of MDRA Items 5 through 3: (5) Reviewing and processing Code amendments governing multiple docks as needed, engaging attorney to counsel administrative staff, committee me.'nbers and board: * Recommendation control 1ic^nse fees by basing them on ^ three-year Cv^st average. (6) (7) Conducting studies and reviews prompted by the installation and operation of multiple docks which directly impact the lake, i.e. dock construction materials evaluation (foam flotation), off-lake storage, or other. * Agreed as applicable to multiple docks. May even require technics 1 consul ting service. Conducting lake use density studies to determine: a) future boat density and b) distribution allowances of multiple docks as changes in use are measured and reported . . . as directed in the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka. * Multiple dock representatives suggested 15% of cost of such studies as applicable to MDRA. Servicing litigatjon resulting from failure of multiple dock licensees to comply with LMCD stipulations, orders or ordinance requirements. * MultipIe dock representatives stronqly supported 3. bond or deposit for non- complyinq 1icensees. April } 3, 1993 meeting;. 1. Ten Code changes related to multiple docks in past two years prompted question is to who benefits by such ordinances. a. Multiple dock reps. believe entire lake benefits. b. LMCD reps, point out that the existence of multiple dock operations require the ordinances. (8) r FEE STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE SUMMARY, 11/12/93, P. 3 2. Bonds or Deposits to recover costs of license enforcement reviewed by staff. a. Staff proposes to first determine 1993 MDRA cost experience, then determine if bond or deposit is necessary. I tern to be continued for. evaluation June 8, 1993 Meeting: 1. Dock Use Area "envelope" Concept was discussed with the prospect of simplifying staff inspectio.i time, therefore lowering costs to multiple dock licensees: a. Limit number of boats to current license count, any increase subject to Special Density requirements b. Allow reconfiguration with a new dock license c. Meet side setback requirements d. Meet dock length requirements e. Grandfathered docks beyond 100' subject to change 1imits No recommendation at this time August 3. 1993 Meeting: 1.Staff progress report on multiple dock license inspections: a. With over half of inspections complete, 20% had some form of license violation. Most common violation -- boats stored in unauthorized locations. Envelope concept cited as a mt.ans to eliminating stipulation governing where a boat is stored in a DUA Dock inspection tuggested by multiple dock rep. to be turned over to cities. b. c. 2. Wo recommendation at this time Residential Slip Rental: a. Multiple dock reps, object to two boats of any origin being allowed at a residential site which leads to rental to persons other than residents of a site. Ho recommendation at this time The above information represents subcommittee evaluation of various fee-related topics to date. Staff time studies are being continued through December, 1993 . . . and will be extended into January or later until board determines the present detailed time tabulation should be reduced or ended. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT March 1* 1993 TOt Fee Study Subcommittee FROM:Board of Directors SUBJECT:Outline Recommended for the Purpose and Identification of Multiple Dock Related Activities for the Fee Study Subcommittee PURPOSE. This subcommittee will serve to identify tasks and activities associated with multiple dock licensing. Tasks identified will be evaluated as to the appropriate level of lake density impact to multiole dock licenses. The subcommittee responsibilities will be performed in consultation with representatives appointed by the licensed multiple dock operators. Multiple dock related activities sre recognized as a contributing factor of the District's responsibility in managing and controlling lake density and lake use issues. MULTIPLE DOCK RELATED ACTIVITIES. The following are xamples of the type of activities associated with multiple docks > 1. Enforcing Code requirements to assure all dock installations comply with multiple dock license 2. provisions. Processing ci annual license renewals from initial preparation, mailing, examination upon response. presentation for committee and board review. approval and administrative processing for swarding of license renewal. • • • • PROPOSED STATEMENT OF PURPOSE, FEE STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE, p. 2 3, Inspecting dock on-site to verify compliance with site plan, orders and stipulations. 4. Communicating any differences with dock site plan. stipulations or orders to licensees. Staff follow up to assure differences are resolved, confirming results in writing. 5. Reviewing ard processing Code amendments governing multiple docks as needed, er.gaging attorney to counsel administrative staff, committee members and board. 6. Conducting studies and reviews prompted by the Installation and operation of multiple docks which directly impact the lake, for example, dock construction materials evaluation (for floating docks, off lake storage, and others. ) 7. Conducting lake use density studies to determine future boat density and distribution allowances of multiple docks as changes in use are measured and reported, as directed by the Management Plan. #• Servicing litigation resulting from failure of multiple dock licensee to comply with LHCD Stipulations, orders or ordinance requirements. ##« *• m 4 • ^ .M* • • <.• •.-» « ■ «r'<7. * .t. ..^ CITY of ORONO Municipal OfTices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Bo* 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 November 19, 1993 Chuck Sigemid District Engineer MnDOT 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville. Minnesota 55113 Dear Mr. Sigerrud, This letter is to re-state the importance of the planned safety improvement project for Highway 12 in Long Lake and Orono. This project was originally scheduled for construction in 1993. It has now been delayed until the Spring of 1995. After a large increase in accidents at the intersection of Willow and Highway 12 in 1992, the cities of Orono and Long Lake formed a committee to determine whether there were any interim solutions to the safety problems at the intersection. The cities proposed the installation of temporaiy signalization at the intersection. However, the alternative was not acceptable to MnDOT because of the need for rechannelization of the intersection, the cost of the temporaiy signalization. and because the permanent safety improvements were scheduled in the near term. The Committee has not lound anv other feasible interim solutions to the .safety concerns at the intersection of Willow and Highway 12. It is critical that the Highway 12 safety improvements project proceeds on schedule for completion in 1995. Please let me know- if there is anything the cities of Long Lake and Orono can do to ensure this project remains on schedule. Citv Administrator relrphniu- :i'2( 47.V7357 • FAX 47.A-031ft Derphavcn Excelsior Greenwood Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista LAKE MINSETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 510 Second Street • P.O. Bo* 473 • Excelsior. Minnesotd 55331-0473 (612) 474-5539 • Fax (612) 474-0430 November 17, 1993 Orono St. Bonlfaclus Shoreu'ood Spring Park Tonka Bap Victoria Woodland Mayor Edward Callahan City Council Members City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Callahan and Council Members: As you know, I think it is very important that the Cable Commission keep you informed on topics that may have a direct effect on the residents/subscribers in your city. To begin with, the 1994 budget was approved by all fourteen cities your joint powers agreement. This support is needed and welcomed the Cable Commission, as we work to represent the best interest the people in Orono. in by of A number of important items have occurred since Administrator, spoke at your city council meeting: Jim Daniels, our - The Cable Commission has filed one Official Complaint against Triax Cablevision, challenging the $1.29 converter charge that now appears on the cable statement. When the FCC rules in favor of the Cable Commission, as we expect it will, all dollars collected should be credited back to the cable subscriber. - The Cable Commission has also filed an FCC 329 form, to insure Triax Cablevision's compliance with the established benchmark rates for any "expanded tier" of service. We will keep you informed, as information is received from the FCC. - We have been working hard to encourage the FCC to extend the existing rate free2e beyond November 15, 1993. We've been told, in a recent conversation with Congressman Ramstad's staff, that it looks like the FCC will keep rates frozen to March 1994 or later. This is a great step in support of our effort to control rates. _ The Cable Commission has challenged Triax Cablevision's interpretation of the new rate regulation language, regarding a monthly charge for additional outlets. Our attorney has informed GEORGE H. DIXON November 16, 1993 1 8 1SS3 Mr. Edward J Callahan, Jr. Mayor of Orono Orono City Hall P O Box 66 Crv'stal Bav, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Callahan: To my mind it is an absolute outrage that the share of my proposed property taxes for 1994 which will go to Orono should be increased by 6 9%, more than double the rate of inflation against a level of taxes which is alrc:*dy way too high When the private sector is insisting on below inflation expense increases, o’" in some cases absolute reductions, it is impossible to understand why so much of the public sector persists in thinking that it needn't subject itself to the same disc’plincs. 1 think of the government of Orono as being good, but I also believe that like every- organization, there's plenty of fat and inetficiency that could be weeded ou»--a!l it takes is the will to get on with it. There are notable examples in the public sector where expenses, and taxes have been reduced absolutely-surely you must know of them Back to the drawing board! 1« WtoWnglon hmhm SouOi. m. tl7 pot». mmmam M401 ill 33*-arao LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Lake Access Committee AGENDA ;; r ■.I • ;1 3 • - - - • % 7:00 PM, Monday, November 22, 1993 LMCD Conference Room 160, Norwest Bank Bldg. 900 E. Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata (Handicapped access, west entrance, Wayzata Blvd.) 1. Report of the 1992 Lake Access Task Force Study, semi final draft presentations on: A. Executive Summary b. Task Force Priority Assignments c. Detailed Report d. Appendix 1) Public Access Inventory 2) Parking Standards Criteria and Supplemental Recommendations 3) Parking Standards 4) Lake Access Parking Agreement 5) Access Site Evaluation Criteria 6) Map of Existing Public Access Sites, Commercial Marinas 7) Lake Zone Map 8) DNR Landowner's Bill of Rights 9) Task Force Designated Members Roster 2. Discuss the process for presenting the draft reports to the Board and subsequently to the Task Force. 3. Adjournment j TO:Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM:John Gerhardson. Public Works Director DATE:November 8. 1993 SUBJECT:Recognition of Appreciation - Scott Oberaigner and Randy O’Brien Public Works Maintenance Workers For the past few years the Orono Public Works Depanment has participated in the Early Childhood Family Education Program. The program allows for public works equipment to be on display with personnel on hand to explain the operation of the equipment to school age and pre-school children in the Orono school district. This year Scott Oberaigner and Randy O’Brien attended the program representing Orono Public Works. The attached note of appreciation was received as a result of Scott and Randy’s panic ipat ion. i)zcu fz> CfCU ^ /tiUJ VfuL/i/: you. l^0C4 d/p£;cJ XU/x/ dL OU a yYttL/t/^dU * ^ dU4. ~7ue-^ ?icuskS/d£Cz^^ f TO; FROM; DATE; Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 19, 1993 SUBJECT; Dental Insurance for Police Officers Background The Police Officer's contract includes a provision whereby the officers can use a portion the city's insurance contribution to pay the single premium portion of the cost of dental insurance coverage. This provision has not been used to this point because the officers have not requested that a dental plan be made available to them. In late 1992 the officers requested the City to institute a dental plan. At the time of the request a process was begun to select a carrier to provide the dental plan. During this process I found that the group of cities with which Orono participates for the joint purchase of health insurance is in the process of developing a request for proposals for dental insurance. Although this process will not be complete until sometime in 1994, it should result in significantly better dental insurance rates than Orono could obtain on its own. In the interim, in order to respond to the police request fot* a dental plan, I plan to select a dental plan to be made available to the officers for 1994 with the understanding that the city can change to a new plan if the RFP process results in a better plan. Cost to the City The Police contract provides that the officers can use a portion of the city's insurance contribution to pay for the single dental insurance premium. Those officers with family insurance coverage are already using the full insurance contribution, so there is no additional cost to the city. Because the contract also provides that those officers with single health insurance coverage may use the difference between the single health insurance coverage premium and the city's insurance contribution to purchase additional insurances, the provision of a dental insurance will not make additional dollars available to the officers. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and CiCy Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Acting Administrator Pay The City Council recently brought to my attention that the pay differential for the Acting Administrator should be 15% of his base pay r».;ther than the current 5%. This is based on action taken by the Council in 1991 at the time the then current City Administrator had accepted new employtr.ent. Based on this information, I have reviewed the 1991 adjustment information and have talked with Mark Bernhardson, the former city administrator and have confirmed that the 15% Acting Administrator pay was to be a permanent adjustment rather than a temporary adjustment during the transition to a new City Administrator. Based on this information, the Acting Administrator pay will be increased to the 15% rate immediately and this rate will be made retro-active to January of 1992 the date the pay was reduced from 15% to 5%. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Police Lieutenant Salary Negotiations The City Council has directed that all salaried positions receive a $20.00 per month increase in the City's health insurance contribution and a $21.00 per month increase in salary for 1994. The Business Agent for the Lieutenanu bargaining unit has indicated the $21.00 per month salary increase is not an acceptable adjust!.ent and that the union will submit the salary issue to binding arbitration if this is the City's final offer. I have reviewed this issue with the City's Labor Relations consultant who has indicated it would be very difficult for the City's position to prevail in arbitration. I have developed a proposal that could resolve the pay issue and a number of other pay related issues without reguiring a larger increase in the Lieutenant's base pay. The proposal is to reconfigure the merit pay that is currently in the Lieutenant contract. The other pay related issues that could be resolved through this proposal are as follows: 1. When the police Lieutenant contract was first put into place, the Lieutenant's pay schedule was based on the city's overall compensation plan which was based on the Comparable Worth job evaluation study. At that time Lieutenant Cheswick's pay was above the pay reflected in the Lieutenants pay schedule. Because of this difference, the contract included, and still includes, a provision whereby Lieutenant Cheswick's pay level will be brought into compliance with the Lieutenant pay schedule. At this time Lt. Cheswick's pay is 2% above the Lieutenant pay schedule. 2. The differential in pay between the Lieutenants and the Police Officers is very small (5.7%); both in terms of the generally accepted differential between a supervisory position and a non“supervisory position, and in terms of the differential between police supervisors and police officers in other comparable cities. This is an area the city is vulnerable in in terms of pay negotiations, especially if the issue is submitted to arbitration. 3. The Lieutenant's contract currently provides for 5% merit pay The merit pay is based on the city providing police service to three additional cities. Although the city's continuation of service to the other cities may oe somewhat related to the performance of the Lieutenants, this is not a direct relationship. There is a need to provide a new set of criteria tor earning the merit pay that is directly performance related. Police Lieutenant Salary Negotiations November 19, 1993 page 2 My proposal is that new performance based criteria be used in determining the amount of merit pay to be received by the Lieutenants and that the amount of merit pay available be increased from 5% to 7%. This change would address the four pay related issues identified above. First, the increase in the merit pay available would provide the potential for a 2% increase in pay for 1994 if merited based on performance. Secondly, the reduction in Lt. Cheswick's base pay to bring it in line with the Lieutenant pay schedule could be offset by the additional 2% of merit pay. Thirdly, the additional 2% of merit pay would increase the pay differential between the Lieutenants and the Officers to bring it more in line with accepted standards. Fourthly, the increase in the amount of merit pay available could be justified if the merit pay criteria were changed to performance based criteria. In general my proposal is that the amount available as merit pay be increased from 5% to 7% and that the merit pay criteria be generally as follows: 1.3% merit pay based on the completion of objectives as mutually determined by the Police Chief and the Lieutenant. 2.3% merit pay based on superior overall performance as indicated by an annual performance evaluation. 3.1% merit pay based on continuing education in accordance with a plan mutually developed by the Police Chief and the Lieutenant. Please let me know if you have any questions or concer.ns regarding this proposal. I 4051 HKlKWOOP ROAD • MOUND MINNESOTA SS3CU Z' November i2. 1993 Mayor Callahan and City Councilmembers; Recently, John Gerhardson’s people tore up part of my property and the adjoining Highwood Road, to replace a section of storm drain and install a catch basim The enclosed pictures show only part of the devastation, but may convev an impression of the concern my wife and I had about the project. In the end, everything was put back pretty much as it had been, as John promised. The purpose of this letter is to commend the City's Public Works staff. They were invariably courteous and considerate. Although they all worked hard, 1 was particularly impressed with Jim Gregory and Greg Palmer, who worked tirelessly and cheerfullv dav after dav.* * This Orono taxpayer can attest to the fact that our Public Works people really earn their pay. Dr. Ai Mrs. Alexander Vongries, 4u.^l Highwood Road Orono. MN 55364 cc: Roi.ald J. Moorse John R. Gerhardson Tony Onnen state Representative V * *»♦ District 20B Carver. McLeod and Wright Counties Minnesota House of Representatives COMMITTcES: FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND INSURANCE. HUMAN SERVICES. HEALTH AND HOUSING FINANCE DIVISION REGULATED INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY November 5, 1W3 Nfayor Ed Callahan P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bav, MN 55323-(X)66 NOV -f'O' Dear Mayor Callahan: As wc arc both interested an«l concerned alwut the future of Trunk Highuray (TH) 12, I wanted to take a few minutes to share with you some information that has recently been released and to clarify any misconceptions regarding the futuie of TH 12. As you well know, this highway is important to the economic viabiUty of our community due to the need for goods movement, rural community commerce, and access for outstate residents to the metro area for daily business, medical, and recreational activities. First, let me clarify one misconception, there is not a direct ’shift" of funding from TH 12 projects to TH 212, to the extent that the planned work on 1-394/TH 12 is completed and MnDOT is now focusing on TH 212 this could be considered a "shift", but it is more of a reprioriiization of projects. Secondly, due to the large numlicr of comments that many of the Highway 12 Task Force members submitted to the Metropolitan Council they have responded to these comments and addressed our concerns. Their response is sumraari/cd in the following paragraphs. The present position of the .Metropolitan Council as listed in the Transportation Development: Guide/Policy Plan (TPP) Ls that "metropolitan highways in the general rural use area shall be planned, designed and operated to emphasize safety, transporting products to market and delivering goixls and services to the rural communities rather than serving commuter trips." An interpretation of this policy is that the Metropolitan Council .Utempts to limit the addition of rural highway cjpacity which acts as an enticement to live further and further from the urban area. The Council’s growth management policies discourage urban level development from occurring in the rural aica of the seven counties or adjacent counties arc the basis for this policy. However, the Council docs recognize and .support the need for highway connections from the mctrt> area and the entire state of Minnesota. The key area of disagreement between the Council and those supptirting TH 12 improvements Is entered on supporting additional highway capacity sized for the peak period (commuter) travxl demand. The Council has attempted to discourage these investments in the pa.st when the decisions rested in MnDOTs hands. M.iny of the members of the Highway 12 Task Force expressed concern that the Council’s TPP dcKS not include any funding for improvrments on TH 12. While TH 12 is mM mcludcd in the TPP, the region ’s Tran.vportation Improvement Program (TIP) diHis include funds for some improvrments. TH 12 is not in the TPP because these projects total less than $10 million. The projects in the TIP arc ain-sistcnt with the policy direction to improve salcty and preserve the highway. In 1993, three projects arc planned. These include channelization and signals at C^H 146 and a ramp meter bypass to castbuund TH 12 at County Road 15. These projects will improve safety, rsp ‘city ar.d provide an incentive for car pixil and transit. 15249 12W 8i»—r S W , Cooato M»io—ora 55321 $t«Ni Onicm BuMng. St. Paul MmoMOta 551S9 tei2) 2M-1S34 TDO (612) 2M-8896 Nov. 5. 1993 Page Two I am pleased with a number of the recommendations made by Carl Ohrn, Principal Planner Metropolitan Council, regarding TH 12. Mr. Ohrn has recommended that this issue should be considered as the Regional Blueprint moves forward within the Council. A number of subissucs of the TH 12 problem need to be addressed in a broader context than transportation. This touches on the region’s relationship with the remainder of Minnesota, economic development of the seven counties and other areas of the state, growth management and infrastructure investments. Even more pleasing is the recommendation that an invitation should be extended for a detailed discussion of the issue between the Council, the Highway 12 Task Force and other concerned groups and individuals. The subject of this meeting should cover issues of need, design alternatives and fimding sources. Increa.scd communication between all parties involved has been an issue that I have been strongly puslmig smcc the beginning of these discussions. I have discussed these tlndings and recommendations with Ken Warner and we are very hopeful that ttiU dialogue between members of the Highway 12 Task Force and the Metropolitan council will continue and increase as the needs and concerns of the task foree are recognized and addressed. A meeting with Carl Ohrn and the Highway 12 Task Foree members will be arranged and held before the end of the year. Details regarding the meeting will be provided later. I would like to thank all of the task force members who sent letters, called or testified before the Metropolitan Council regarding this very serious issue - our concerns have been heard. will need to ccotinfc ^he communication that has been established and work toward a uniform resolution. Please feel free to c intact me at any time with your comments or suggestions for TH 12. Sincerely, Tony Onnen State Representative District 20B TO/sb TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 19, 1993 SUBJECT: City Recorder The new City Recorder is Barbara Anderson. Barbara has extensive experience in recording both Planning Commission and Council meeting minutes through positions with the cities of Plymouth and Minnetonka. Unfortunately Barbara's tenure with Orono may be short-lived. She is being laid-off from a part-time 3ob in Minnetonka ana may need to take a full time job a new part-time position. If she does accept a full time position she will not be able to continue as the city's recorder. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ORONO INDEPENDENT’ SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON OCTOBER 25, 1993 The regular meeting of the Board of Education of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, October 25, 1993. Present: Dave McKown Peg Swanson Thomas Mich James Franklin Martha Van de Ven Neal Lawson Board members John Maresh and Pamela Schroeder arrived while the meeting was in progress. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Martha Van de Ven, the consent agenda was approved as follows: approved the minutes of the October 11, 1993 regular meeting; approved the appointment of Virginia Diethart as computer clerk at Schumann Elementary School for the 1993-94 school year; approved the following coaches for fall sports: Bill Greenwood, cross country; Steve Boylan, assistant football; Ray Poquette, soccer - boys; John Merchant, soccer - girls; Michelle Olson, tennis - girls; Julie Hanson, assistant volleyball; Suzanne Johnson, assistant volleyball; Linda Christo^iher, assistant swimming - girls; Charles Plante, diving - girls; approved the bills as covered by vouchers 079808 through 079943. Motion carried. Board members Maresh and Schroeder absent. Dr. Mich reported that a professional day was held today for the faculty on team building and technical training; that the new telephones are installed at Orono Primary School; that he would be conducting the Elements of Effective Instruction on October 28 and 29 and the Board is invited to attend; that a breakfast will be held on November 3 to honor Ron Gilbert, retired Schumann Elementary Principal; that he wanted to congratulate all the fall sports teass for a sensational season and he expressed appreciation to all of the coaches for their good work; that he was distributing a letter from Melodee Monicken and Tracy Nordstrom, who will be substituting for Ms. Monicken while she is on sabbatical leave, which was sent to all parents with students in Ms. Monicxen's classes; that fencing, for safety purposes, will oe placed around the pond that has developed at the Student Center as a result of grading, etc.; that in their packet they had received the District's Annual Report and he expressed appreciation to Connie Fladelaiid, Toni Bergland and Carl Shutts for their work on this report. Dr. Maresh presented information to the Board regarding high school athletics and the difficulties that have arisen in winter sports as the numbers of students that want to participate in these sports are exceeding the capabilities of the coaching staff. He stated that he had met with Steve Fedie, Mike Blanski, Doug Erickson and Dr. Shutts and a participation policy was developed which he distributed to the Board. Dr. Mich stated that this policy will be reviewed/studied in further detail and it will be brought back to the Board for discussion/review before any action is taken. Mr. McKown stated that the Board of Education had adjourned to Executive Session after the October 11, 1993 meeting for the purpose of conducting the annual evaluation of the Superintendent, Dr. Mich. He stated that the Board of Education gave Dr. Mich a very superior rating in his administration of the School District and his leadership. Mr. McKown expressed appreciation to Dr. Mich for his work and his leadership. Neal Lawson provided the Board with information on the little league baseball fields. He stated that the City of Orono has taken action on these fields and is willing to lease land from the School District for that purpose. He reviewed the rough draft of the location of the baseball fields and roadway and stated that the City of Orono is currently preparing a draft of a lease agreement to which the administration/Board of Education can then respond. Mr. Lawson answered questions from the Board for clarification purposes. The consensus of the Board was that the Facilities Committee should provide preliminary approval on the draft so that the development of the fields can move aliead. With regard to 1993-94 lobbying efforts. Dr. Mich stated that Peg Swanson, Martha Van de Ven and he had attended a meeting of school districts within the metropolitan Educational Cooperative Services Unit (ECSU) for the purpose of determining if there was interest on the part of metropolitan school districts to band together for lobbying purposes. He stated that the consensus of the attendees at that meeting was to move in che direction of working together in this effort and that while it may take some time, it is hoped that this group could become visible in the upcoming legislative session. Ms. Julie Railsback, social worker at Orono High School, addressed the Board regarding the observation of Minnesota Chemical Health Week in our District the week of November 12 - 19, 1993 and outlined for the Board the activities that will take place during that week. UPON MOTION by Peg Swanson, seconded by Pamela Schroeder, the Board of Education approved November 19, 1993 as Parent/Student Exchange Day at Orono Middle School. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by John Maresh, the Board of Education congratulated those teachers who have earned tenure as members of the Orono School District faculty effective at the beginning of the 1993-94 school year. Motion carried. At this time a Tenure Ceremony was held at which principals/supervisorp introduced/acknowledged each newly tenured teacher, those teachers being: Pam Brinkhaus, Chris Bruce, Julia Chalfant, Sarah Dahlgren, Barb Danger, Lrou Doherty, Maureen Gibbon, Lucinia Gorman, Sue Heidt, Susan Hofer, Jodi Hoff, Don Krubsack, Adair New, Julianne Ohmann, Deanne Ronald, and Darren Wolf. After the adjournment of the Board meeting, a reception was held for the newly tenured teachers. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Pamela Schroeder, the meeting was adjourned. Motion carried. ohn Maresh, Clerk Dave McKown, Chairman TO:Mayor and City Councix FROM: DATE: Ren Moorse, City Administrator November 17, 1993 '/i SUBJECT:Upcoming Highway 12 Joint Mediation Dates Tuesday, November 30th - 4:00 p.m. Tuesday, January 4th - 4:00 p.m. Tuesday, January 25th - 4:00 p.m TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Council Update 1. Highway 12 Policy Committee Meeting The Highway 12 Policy Committee met on Wednesday, November 17. MnDOT provided an update on the various areas of the EIS study. The EiS study is moving along at a pace that will meet the completion schedule of Spring of '95. MnDOT provided plans of each of the three corridor layouts which are getting more detailed. MnDOT is beginning to work on the details of both the current corridor and the north corridor. MnDOT indicated they wil., have sufficient funding for the total Economic Impact Scudy. However, the consultant originally being considered to conduct the study has indicated he may not be the right person to provide the information the cities of Orono and Long Lake need to work through their issues. The city ne'^is to identify the specific economic impact issues, and information needed to analyze those issues in order to assist MnDOT in providing a better focus for the econom’c impact analysis study and in selecting a consultant to conduct the study. The agenda of the next i.iediation meeting may include a discussion of the economic impact issues and the types of information needed by the citJ^'a to address these issues. 2. Long Lake Water Quality Project Meeting A meeting was held on Friday, November 19 to review the Long Lake water quality improvement project being administrated by the NiUWD. Those in attendance included; Ellen Sones, the MCWD Administrator, two staff people from the MCWD's engineering firm, the Mayors of Medina and Long Lake, a representative of the Hennepin Conservation District and a member of the MCWD Board. The water quality improvement project was begun in 1991. The first step was a diagnosis of the current quality of the lake and the sources of the water quality problem. The diagnosis has been completed and a general plan has been developed for improving the water quality. The major contribitor to the low water quality is phosphorus loading into the lake from both agricultural land and residential land. The water quality improvement project includes a community based campai-gn to increase awareness and change practices to reduce phosphorus run-off from both residential and agricultural land. It also includes the construction of two sedimentat.ion ponds to intercept phosphorus and other nutrients before they get to the lake, and the installation of two aerators in Long Lake. The MCWD is available to review this plan with the City Council. Council Update Cont November 22, 1993 page 2 of 2 3 . 4 . Ponding for the Highway 12 Safety Improvements The planned safety improvements for Highway 12 require ponding for the additional run-off to be generated by the additional hardcover. MnDOT's plans are to place a pond north of Highway 12 in the middle of the City's commercial development area. The original plan called for an eight acre pond which would handle all future drainage needs of the entire area bounded by Highway 12, Willow, County Road 6 and Old Crystal Bay Road. Staff has met with MnDOT to indicate that the City wants to preserve as much land as possible for commercial development along Highway 12. MnDOT has indicated it could reduce the size of the pond to 4 acres to serve only the increased ponding needs of the safety improvement project. This would require all future development to provide for its own ponding. Staff will obtain advice from a planning consultant regarding the extent of ponding that will best facilitate future commercial development along Highway 12. LOGIS Data Processing Service The LOGIS executive committee has began a study to determine the performance of the LOGIS organization in providing cost effective information processing services to the LOGIS cities. This study will include a comparison of the costs cf receiving information processing services from IiOGIS versus other alternatives. It will also include the development of a plan for improving the services provided by LOGIS. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^ November 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Police Department Revenues and Expenditures At a recent Budget Work Session, Councilmember Hurr asked whether Lhe Police Department revenues had been reduced by more than the $16,000 reduction related to the Spring Park proposal. Councilmembei Hurr indicated that if the revenues were lower than the original projection the expenditures should also be reduced. The process of determining Police Department expenditures and revenues begins on the expenditure side after the Police Department budget is developed. The expenditure numbers are input into a cost allocation formula to determine each city's share of the expenditures. The share of the expenditures paid by the three contract cities then becomes the revenue generated by the police services. The initial Police revenue projection was a 4% increase over 1993. This was a high estimate and was the same estimate as was provided to the contract cities as a preliminary revenue number. When the proposed budget was completed the actual increase in the Police expenditures was reduced to 2.2%. This reduction in expenditures was translated into a similar reduction in revenues through the cost allocation formula. The initially projected 4% expenditure increase would have put the expenditure amount at $1,188,621. The 2.22% increase put the expenditure amount at $1,168,261.00. This amount was further reduced by the $16,000 revenue reduction related to the Spring Park proposal. f TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorae, City Administrator / DATE:November 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Highway 12 Technical Committee Meeting A Highway 12 Techr.ical Wednesday, December 15 meeting agenda has not the review of the most regarding the location points and interchanges Committee meeting has been scheduled for from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Although the been set, one of the agenda items will be current roadway layouts to provide input of such things as; intersections, access along the corridors. L TOi Mayor and City Council moNt Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATIt November 22, 1993 fUBJSCTt County Consideration of Closing the Long Lake Branch of the Library branch through a letter to Commissioner Staples and the County Board. L .^ 4^' V' - *am. PlPef- ' 5’ \ If; % TOi Ren Moorse, City Administrator FXOMt John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director OATBi November 22, 1993 SUBJICTi Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Proposed Grant (MHFA) Just recently we were advised that application amounts for the Stubbs Bay Sewer connection grant program were far exceeding our expectations. We thought initially that connection cosis would be about 2000-2500 on the average. However, due to very long sewer lines or necessary interio." plumbing changes the costa are coming in at or near $5,000.00. The City of Orono allocated approximately $16,000 of the year 19 Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) funds toward the connection grant program. We were just advised that there is additional funding for this type of activity through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. The funding availability is from $30,000 to $350,000 per application. Hennepin County Planning and Development would submit an application for the City and administer the program the same way it does for the CDBG program. The City of Orono would reimburse the administrating the program from future CDBG monies monies do not allow for administrative expenses. County for as the MHFA The County must submit an application by December 6, 1993. Therefore we would like conceptual approval at this time to proceed with the understanding that the City has the right to cancel participation if for any reason we wish to do so. TOt ntoNt DATIt Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director November 22, 1993 SQBJICTi Cost Update Underground Tank Removal On September IJ, 1993 staff recommended and Council approved contracting with Braun Intertec to coordinate the underground fuel tank removal at the Old City offices and Public Works site in the Crystal Bay area. Braun Intertec's fee for this activity was $1,950. if there were not any contaminated soils. Once the consultant was approved that consultant received bids for the disposal of the underground tanks. Griffin Service Station Equipment was the lowest bidder at $18,000. Because these were contaminated soils additional samples were taken and analyzed. This additional work increased the consultant and laboratory costa to $3,506.00 an increase of $1,556.00 The consultant fees for further testing (soil borings) report preparation and submittal is estimated at $7,195.00 The break do%m of that amount is as follows: Field Technician Project Manager Word Processor Land Drafting Supervisor lOhrs •55.00 *550. 32.5hrs 9 68.00 2210. 3hrs 9 43.00 129. 4hrs 9 55.00 220. 6hrs 9 85.00 510. 3619 Drilling Services 6 borings 9 456.67 2740. Laboratory Services 830. 7195 The soil testing being done today should determine the amount of area and depth of the contaminated soils. The consultant will also be receiving bids for clean up of the contaminated soils already encountered, some of which is stock pi)ed on the Public Works site as per PCA direction and approval. The methods for clean up of the contaminated soils is land spreading and aerating or transporting to a bituminous plant to "burn” off the contaminates.