The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-02-1986 Planning Packet*- -* v-*.» PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1986 7:30 P.M. 1275 BRONN ROAD SOOTH - COONCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Ed Callahan ATTENDANCE PUBLIC BEARINGS 1* 7:30 p.m. #1080 John McDowell, 3700, 3750, 3770- 3780, 3820, 3830 and 3860 Bayside Road - Rezoning 2. 7:45 p.m. #1083 Thomas Bernier, Doug Klint and Gary Barr 3535, 3545 Ivy Place and 3034 Casco Point Road Renewal of Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement ACTION ITEMS 3. #1060 J.F. Fleischhacker, 2775 Shadywood Road - Variance - Second Review 4. #1062 Ingeborg Cici, 875 Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit/Commercial Site Plan Review 5. #1070 Richard Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road - Variance Second Review 6. #1078 John Massopust, 440 South Brown Road ~ Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 7. #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road Variances - Public Hearing 8. #1082 John F. Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 9. #1084 Robert Maxfield, 4175 North Shore Drive Variances - Public Hearing 10. #1085 Richard E. Brown, 1245 Sixth Avenue North Variances Public Hearing SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 11. #1086 Charles Pexa, 1200 Lyman Avenue Sketch Plan Review - Subdivision ADDITIONAL ITEMS 12. Planning Commission approval of September 15, 1986 minutes. 13. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the November 10, 1986 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC ATTENDANCE P.C • I CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE /0'‘3,0' (ft? PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. 'I ' A NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda)• # Qci. 2. rut Co\n>r.4> 1 / ^oSo B»^oj5rri<7 ^o/ 3. PP 3 *660 10^ ^ 5. ^koA^ / /9^o L>-r/ pJ.lOrri l8.Ho PI^wJh to?a 7. r-ncAuiW'''^b'^R iAu ‘; ii)ir i-i)to A ^-V-/t: .O w 9 >*/S^U-C /-^<tr>-{¥-//y^'b ■5770 ^^■^■Jbfl\ 1 . iiuh ILit A.'} 5 d)j/.*<}/X^pJ « /.P,P:?C7^/dPsl K8i6’ro &i!(/. A,^.10 C2 ' / 5. /7./^.JeW£Tr zs^Rl'i'yP.1^93 A ^CyMvi . [ '’v\'A. r>1 a So 7. liv ^V \AC1,\a ^v /A~9es cT-U w.U&c loiO i./Al P>Lo\/'P'R /^'3_3f 9. • 0. i / ‘ i \ . » , ! To:Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Pr<Jeanne A, Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date:October 16, 1986 Subject: #1080 John McDowell, 3700, 3750, 3770, 3780, 3820, 3830 & 3860 Bayside Road - Rezoning - Public Hearing - 7:30 p.m. A. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.27 Section 10.23 Section 10.28 Section 10.10 RR-IA Zoning District LR-IA Zoning District RR-lB Zoning District Rezoning Requirements B. Pertinent Sections of the CMP 1980: Rural Area Goals and Policies CMP 2-6, 2-7 Environmental Protection Goals CMP 3-18 General Policies for Natural Resouce Management CMP 3-9 thru 3-22 - Specific Policy 8 CMP 3-20 Rural Area Policies for Natural Resource Management CMP 3-23 Rural Land Use Policies CMP 4-19 thru 4-22 Rural Residential Land Use CMP 4-27 thru 4-31 C. Pertinent Sections of the CMP 1974: Land Use Objectives - Chapter III - Residential Development B - Lakeshore Residential Exhibit h C - Rural Residential Exhibit I List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit O Exhibit P Exhibit Q Application Plat Map Property Owners List Affidavit of Publication Certificate of Mailing Notice of Planning Commission Summary of Information Meeting 10/14/86 CMP - 1974 - Lakeshore Residential CMP - 1974 - Rural Residential Legal Description RR-lA Legal Description LR-IA Staff Memo 4/27/77 Regarding Burger Division Survey of Burger Division - Redefining Wetlands Existing Land Use/Ownership Designations Amended Wetlands Map Corrected Zoning Map Dry Land Areas of Burger and Miner Properties Zoning File #1980 October 16, 1986 Page 2 of 5 Review of Application: At the Planning Commission meeting of September 15, 1986, conceptual direction was given to the applicants advising them to proceed with a formal rezoning application. In earlier discussion, it was thought that the applicants should first seek conceptual direction from the Council in light of the major expenses involved in the preparation of a multi phased application (rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit). Applicant was advised that in rezoning applications involving the RR-IA zoning district, the City has consistently sought the input of the residents of the 5-acre rural zone before taking any position on a rezoning application. The RR-IA zoning district exists because the majority of its residents wish to retain the ambiance of the large acred - hobby farm - low density neighborhood. The most recent request by developers to rezone an RR-IA property adjacent to a zoning boundary line was the Painters Creek Development group. The application involved the former Ski Tonka properties - the rezoning sought a change from RR-IA to RR-IB - Rural 2-acres minimum. The rezoning was denied and the property developed under the PRD made at the one unit per 5-acre density. Comments on petition for rezoning: The applicant is John McDowell, potential buyer of the Miner tract# ^he owners^who actively seek the rezoning^are Andrew Miner and John Burger. Hazel Anderson, Steve Gardiner and James Maus are the adjacent property owners whose properties are included in the areas to be rezoned. Please review Exhibit N depicting ownership and location of existing residences. Note per Section 10.10, Subdivision 2 (3) - the vagueness of this standard would suggest we have received a valid petition. Please note Exhibits H, I & P, the City zoning maps are incorrect and show Gardiner's .39 acre property included in the RR-IA zone. Gardiner's property is already located within the LR-IA zone. Staff will verify the records but it appears that the east 75 feet of the Maus property is also included in the LR-IA zone. Burger was to complete a rezoning of that corridor to RR-IA with his 1977 subdivision application but it is not clear from the information currently available to staff if that has been completed. General Pacts: Approximate Total Area = 41.1 acres Approximate Dry Area = 23.3 acres Amended Dry Area =* 25.2 acres Approximate Wet Area = 17.6 acres Amended Wet Area = 15.9 acres J Zoning File #1080 October 16, 1986 Page 3 of 5 Current Zoning District FR-IA: Requires one unit per 5-dry acres [if divided by wetlands 2 of the 5 acres must be contiguous for building site per Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 A (1)]. Maximum units allowed (per corrected wetlands map. Exhibit 0) Allowed * 5 units or 1 unit per 5.04 acres Existing = 6 units or 1 unit per 4.2 acres Proposed Rezoning to *LR-1A Allowed * 12 units or 1 unit per 2.1 acres Existing = 6 units or 1 unit per 4.2 acres Proposed « 9 units or 1 unit per 2.8 acres * It should be noted that based on the location of the wetlands in relation to the limits of the Burger and Miner properties (note Maus does not want to be included in subdivision, per Exhibit E) there are two dry contiguous areas that may be considered for development: The southern half of the Miner property (Review Exhibit Q) Actual Area « 6.19 acres Allowed = 3 units Realistically With Road Areas to be Considered = 2 units Road areas to be considered: Area B per Exhibit Q Allowed = 1 unit Existing = 1 unit Area C per Exhibit Q Allowed * *4 units Existing = 0 This would also depend on the exact locations of wetland boundaries and may limit development to 3 units - dry buildable is at a minimum - in Burger’s subdivision there was a gain of dry acres. Total affect of rezoning to two acre Existing on Burger & Miner Properties = 4 units Potential Density = 7 units «t r Zoning File #1080 October 16, 1986 Page 4 of 5 Standards to be considered with review: 1.Per Section 10.10, Subdivision 3 "It is necessary to find that the proposed rezoning is in the best interest for the physical development of the City" This is the only standard available from the rezoning section of the code. 2. Review the intent of zoning districts: RR-IA, RR-IB and LR-IA. a) Which of the districts more clearly reflects the current pattern of development? b) Review Exhibit O - the majority of the properties are located within 1,000 feet of the lakeshore. c) Review CMP 3-20 8. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with Mn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, the City will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat den<”.ity and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. Are the current standards of the RR-IA zon.lng district able to uphold this policy? d) Determine if this is spot zoning? e) Is this area suitable for quasi agricultural uses associated with large lot rural areas? f) Review CMP 4-28 "1 dwelling per 5 acres If ^ 1. Does this section imply that if citizens do not desire this type of density that they may petition for a change? 2. Do you agree the basis for this zoning is historic and not environmental? 3. Is the north shore of Stubb's Bay pattern of development similar to the development of properties in the "northwest corner of the City"? Will the rezoning make major changes? Good? Bad? > Zoning File #1080 October 16r 1986 Page 5 of 5 In reviewing the Comprehensive Plan, Planning Commission may wish to bring forth other issues for discussion. The applicants should certainly be given every opportunity to address the City*s issues and any others they may set forth for the record. Staff has been advised that several residents will be in attendance to either express their approval or disapproval. It will be our task to listen and to address any questions that residents may have - there are many rumors being circulated around the City and we should make every attempt to correctly inform the public of the real facts. Staff has enclosed a memo from the applicants (Exhibit G), reviewing an information meeting held in our Council Chambers on Tuesday, October 14th for all persons notified on the property owners list. 25 persons attended the meeting. Review the memo as many concerns have already been expressed to the applicants. Planning Commission Action: Staff would recommend that members take the opportunity to listen to all sides and issues raised - answer questions - raise your own questions - review the current zoning and CMP guidelines for the public in attendance. - table the application. Give staff conceptual direction so that staff can prepare a recommendation supported with the necessary findings for your meeting in November so that you may formally act on the rezoning application. ll -f </■- /S' b O. il‘ § GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION CMT Site Address Z ^ 0 6l>u Ciclk Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Please check one - Is the property (for Conditional Use Applications only) abstract or torreng? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name J M ^d)oyb^' (f_ _ _ _ _ _ _Phone Mailing Address ^0^ ^ OWNER _ , Name ^ HJ ^//_ _ _ _ _ _Phone Mailing Address i i-L SS3T£. Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration _____ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _________ $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _ _ _ _ $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision rens? id on >re OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Ottier - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _ _ _ Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail; REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1* Completed Application Form. 2.Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A—603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant * s signature OWNERS SIGNATURE (J Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date pllnttnTcoZlsston into the City offices 25 days before the third Monday of each month?* Planning Commission Meetings are held on the obtain trnment e names .ease n has d or id/or that i/her ther ants, s of t the I the e ;/ » 7i ranr \ i 4 — ♦if 1 ■ 1 1 % 11 /«£5 • e S I % Uat$/jfLZ ... ? ! % __Hi. ^ ///— ///\ /i7 i 1 • / wf---------Ju .'B"* 1If ! J ft fA» 1 "y ■ '\ Z I o 'j: zmz Z 2 <9Q m ^ 'J « rm » M - 1 1 V ^1 M&R k = «s * it* f ■» r •■1 c» * _____T*. 1 '5* •A 3- C 1L 1r• i * ---------Lutf_ * <'0' •' r ‘k /.r V. !■ ! I n'" PROPERTY OWNERS LIST - ZONING FILE #1080 06-117-23 11 0003 David J. Winton Box 115 Long Lako, MN 55356 05-117-23 12 0011 George S, Terp 165 Bederwood Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 06-117-23 11 0004 G.M. Connell 4050 Bayside Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 2 05-117-23 12 0012 12 Maureen & Patrick Kennedy 185 Bederwood Drive ' Long Lake, MN 55356 06-117-23 11 0005 Curtis Levang 4010 Bayside Road Maple Plain,MN 55359 3 05-117-23 12 0013 13 Joann W, Gustafson 200 Bechewood Dr. Long Lake, MN 55356 06-117-23 14 0003 John McDowell 4045 Bayside Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 05-117-23 13 0021 V.H.Larson 25404 Lake Rd. - Bay Village, OH 44140 , I 06-117-23 14 0014 R.R. Stueland 4080 Bayside Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 5 , 05-117-23 13 0041 Jeffrey & JoAnne Barttett 3568 Bayside Ave. Long Lake, MN 55356 06-117-23 11 0017 Richard G. Marklund 3415 High Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 13 0047 15 Alvin & Beatrice Balgaard 3560 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 12 0007 7 i 05-117-23 13 0048 E.B. Larson/Marion Rickett Victor E. Norton 16! 3304 Skycroft Drive Minneapolis, MN 55418 3580 BAyside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 12 0008 Clement Kroll 60 Stubbs Bay Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 8 05-117-23 13 0006 1 Jeffrey Mueller St D. Boelz ; 222 Bederwood Dr. ' Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 12 0009 Weldon H. Dunn 40 Stubbs Bay Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 05-117-23 12 0010 V.E. Norton 3580 Bayside Road Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 13 0014 18 Darly Carlson & P.M Rowlett 3470 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 10: 05-117-.23 13 0016 Lester Nelson 3510 Bayside Rd- Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 24 0100 Steve Gardiner 3770 BAyside Rd. Logn Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 24 0105 Fred Price K-1 Enterp. 1611 Park Ave. S. Mpls., MN 55404 22 05-117-23 24 0111 Gerald Rowlette 3775 Bayside Rd. Long Lake,MN 55356 05-117-23 24 0039 24 Hubert Olson & Jane Olson 3640 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 24 0069 James & Joan Maus 3700 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 25 05-117-23 24 0082 Daniel Cahill 224 N. 5th St. Delavan, WI 53115 05-117-23 24 0083 27 John Burger & Ester Greei 3750 Bayside Rd. Long Lrke, MN 55356 05-117-23 22 0002 Andrew Miner 3860 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 22 0004 29 M.G. & S.R. Filbrandt 3960 Bayside Rd. Maple Plian, MN 55359 05-117-23 23 0004 Louis & Mary Rozoil 3965 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23-23 0002 Leonard Lofgren 3845 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0007 Emmet G. Peterson Rt 1 Box 489 Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23-23 0008 D & K Dianis 17308 Hampton Ct. Mtka., MN 55345 05-117-23 23 0009 Lee C. Harren 3895 Bayside Rd. Long Lake,MN 55356 05-117-23-23 0011 C.E. Miller Charles St. Long Lake,MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0013 Phyllis Stenderson 340 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23-23 0014 Thomas Connelly 2233 N. Hamline Roseville, MN 55113 05-117-23 23 0015 E.C. ANderson 356 West Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0016 W.W. Paasch 364 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0017 Leo Leven & D. Maeser 6972 Hickory Dr. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 05-117-23 23 0020 E W. Spencer 405 Tonkawa Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0021 Gregg & Bette Perl 309 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 022 4 R6D Olsen & Patty Fames ! 341 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0025 44 E.T. Anderson & M. Rickett 349 W.Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0027 Janet Donaldson 389 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0028 Charlie Langert 373 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0029 Eleanor Meland 365 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0012 Frank Lowry 332 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 48 05-117-23 21 0005 Hazel Anderson 3780 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 i 05-117-23 21 0012 I John & Magdalen Pidgeon f 10912 Glen Wilding Ln. ’ Bloomington, MN 55431 o 05-117-23 21 0013 George Burnhart 3630 Eileen St. Maple Plain, MN 55359 5; 05-117-23 21 0013 Vincent Burnhart 3620 Eileen St. Maple Plain, MN 55359 5; 32-118-23 43 0007 5 M. Foley & I. Josephson 3505 Watertown Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 32-118-23 43 0006 Doraline Dunn 3565 Watertown Rd. Long Lake,MN 55356 32-118-23 43 0005 Mr.&Mrs. R. Robertson 3535 Watertown Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 51 32-118-23 34 0002 Norman E. Walker 1649 College South Bend, IN 46628 32-118-23 34 0003 Sorina Rasmussen 75 Stubbs Bay Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23-34 0004 58 Edward & Judy Brown III 65 N. Stubbs Bay Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 34 0005 R. Grinley & K. Tukua Dennis Krump 25 N. Stubbs Bay Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 51 32-118-23 34 0006 John Dunn 20 S. Brown Rd. P.O. Box 77 Long Lake, MN 55356 6( * I » / i 32-118-23 34 0007 Thomas J. Maxwell 3685 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 33 0002 James Brooks 3785 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 34 0008 Arlie Thorpe Rt 2, Box 48 Maple Plain, MN 55359 62 32-118-23 31 0002 Catharine Cram 3760 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 34 0009 G.F.* Butterfield 3745 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 33 0001 Loren Butterfield Rt 2 Box 43 Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 34 OCIO . Larry & Linda Cook 3765 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 ' ^ * • • * O * * t •"tv • • 4 i t :. c >S. j f 'i ' • i h 1 f i ' », . f, i V/ ^ / . t - 4. *1 .. . * l»4 '* r . f *% •*/ • /< •t * .*). •* 4« ^ • i- -J I ik nr 1 :V'"m. /« , ♦ 4 • t ciTUir-jaaotfo NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday. October 20. 1986 at 7 30 p m on the matter of John McDowell s ap plication lor the rezoning of properties totaling approximately 40 acres in area located within the RR-1A. rural residential zoning district requir- lr>g five acres of dry land The application pro poses rezoning the subject area to either a rural or lokeshore residential district requiring two acres of dry contiguous land The area is bor dered on the north by the Luce Line, on the south by Bayside Road and is approximately 600 feet west of Stubbs Bay Road The properties are legally described as follows 1 Andrew Miner property Lots 53 and 58. Auditor s Subdivision No 203 2 John Burger property Lot 1. Block 1. Burger s Bayside 3 Hazel Anderson property Lot 52. Auditor’s Subdivision No 203 4 Steve Gardiner property Lots 1. 2. 3 and 4. Oltoviile on Lake Min netonka 5 James Maus property Lot 2. Block 1 E irger s Bayside All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this tIiTVB Written comments are solicited Please make an appointment with staff to review the plans City of Orono By: Planning Commission. # Jeanne A Mabusth. Building and Zoning Administrator (Published in The Laker and Pioneer Sept. 30 and Oct. 7. 1986) r.*' r- - ' ' ^ ' s. » r FT • 7 r. V * *» - M • i..; \ '■ u Affidavit of Publication state of Minnesota. County of Hennepin. Bill Hoim, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as Tl IE LAKER, Mound. Min nesota. and has full Knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the re quirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed ^'0jrc4. which is attached was cut from the columns of said lewspaper, and was printed and published once each week for ___7cr successive weeks: It was first published Tuesday, the day of .19 Si and was thereafter printed and published every Tuesday, to and including Tuesday. the 7 day of d-Crr-.19 — I Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this ___/ ^ day of ^. 19 (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $7.64 per IrKh. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $4.S4 per IrKh (3) Rate actually charged for above matter; $4.54 per IrKh Each additional successive week; $3.03 per irKh k-' w ZONING PILE NO. 1079 CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 55323 473-735?Date of Notice; 9/16/86 TO:John McDowell Merrill Lynch Realty 315 E. Lake St. Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: Gary Peterson Peg Swanson Merrill Lynch 315 E. Lake St. Wayzata, MN 55391 Andrew Minor 3860 Bayside Rd LL., MN 55356 TYPE OP APPLICATION: XX Sketch plan review DATE OF MEETING: 9/15/86 VOTE:For Against NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 to conceptually approve the proposed rezoning from RR-IA to a 2 acre rural zone either RR-lB or LR-IA - whatever the City deemed more appropriate. You have been advised to proceed with a formal rezoning application in order to obtain the public's input on thij matter early in the review. Please contact staff regarding procedures for filing required applications and fees for rezoning application. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the October 20, 1986 meeting is September 19, 1986. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional Information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. rJ^raisaiiii J TO: Jean Ma&usth, City Planning Aaministrator RE: Summary of Informal Meeting - Proposed Zoning Change Ki 1 ner/Burger Property DATE: OctoDer 15, 1986 FROM: John MacDoweil, Gary Petersen, Peg Swanson The meeting was held Tuesday, October 14, 1986 at the Orono Council Chambers from 7:00-9:00 p.m. An invitation to the meeting was mailed out to all property owners that received formal notification o-^ the up-coming Public Hearing. Approximately 25 persons were in at tendance. The purpose of the meeting was to provide information regarding the developers plans for tne proposea zoning change ana sub-divisi on. A proposed sub-division sketch was given to each participant. The majority of the meeting time was spent discussing the adjoining property owner“s questions and concerns. Mr. Thomas Humphrey, legal coucil for the developers, moderated the meeting. SUMMARY Mrs. Hazel Anderson was concerned that the proposed new road was located adjacent to her home. She felt this could potentially cause a water problem for her property. (Mrs. Anderson's daughter spoke on her behalf.) Her daughter also felt the road would have a negative affect on the property if they were to tear the existing house down and rebuild at a future time. Steve Gardner was against the proposed road because he would have roads on three sides of his home. He also stated he bought his home in the area because it was a 5 acre zone with open spaces and beautiful land. He expressed concern that the proposed tw’o acre zoning change would compromise the personality of the area and only oe in the best interests of the developers. Another resident expressed concern that more docks on the StuDbs Bay lakeshore would be environmentally damaging to the Lake. John Burger said that when he bought in the area it was a 2 acre zone and then changed tc 5 acre. He could not remember why this zoing change was implemented. The woamn who lives in the Poisson home was concerned that the oeaXity of the area would be damaged if the zoning change was passed. She also felt changes would only be to the advantage of the developers. Some of the residents expressed concern that the proposed zoning change would increase the possibility of sewer being approved for the area. Gary Connell built his new home in the area because of the privacy. He does not want to see another home from his home. He too felt the proposed change v;ould only be to the economic advantage of the developers. He felt this change would only encourage more development. One resident expressed concern that the wetlands would be damaged with a road running through them. Two residents wanted to know if there would be restrictive covenants for the proposed sub-division. They were concerned it would look like Painter's Creek - large "track homes" that are built too close together. John Maass was concerned that his property was included in the Public Hearing without his approval. He requested his property be exluded in the proposed sub-division. However, he expressed no opposition to the proposed zoning change. Mike Filbrandt was in favor of the proposed re-zoining and sub-diV1 SI on. He couldn"t understand why people would be opposed to the proposed changes. ^V- 9 - B. Lakeshore Residential Land area within Orono Village that is within close proximity to Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake that has little or no natural filtration or purification of stormwater runoff, should make up the lakeshore residential classification. Generally, all land within at least 1000 feet of the lakes should be included in this classification. Environmental protection of Lake Minnetonka should be paramount in the land use restriction of this residential classification. Housing should be limited to single family dwellings at low densities 1/2 to 2 units per acre. In areas where public sanitary sewer is not available the mini- mun building site should be not less than 2 acres. Other environmental protection requirements should include a 75 foot building set back from the shoreline, non polluting fertilizer, erosion control, a maximum hardcover limitation, the prevention of major tree and shrub removal within 75 feet of the lakeshore, and a prohibition against major changes of natural land contours by grading, filling, or dredging. These standards are consistent with those of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Lake Minnetonka • Conservation District, and the State c_ Minnesota. fV- W- Si- I: k ' ■« (!■' i"Li> - 10 - C. Rural Residential Public and private actions should maintain to the greatest extent possible the rural character of this residential classification. Land should remain in parcels large enough to permit quasi-agricultural (hobby farm, horse stables, etc.) conservation, as well as residential uses. Certain restrictions on residential development should be imposed, because of the existence of numerous wetlands and drainageways to Lake Minnetonka, steep slopes, inferior soil types and other natural characteristics. These restrictions should minimize the need for expensive public services such as sanitary sewer, municipal water, major improvements in public transportation, and most important, public storm water sewer and treatment facilities. Standards for residential development should preclude the need for extension of additional metropolitan sewer interceptors through rural lands, a recommended policy of the Metropolitan Council in their working policies for Metropolitan Development • Framework. Therefore, housing within the rural classification would be limited to single family dwellings, with a minimum lot size of at least two acres. This size will allow on-site sewage and private water systems. The resulting population densities will require no major changes to the road system and will produce a minimum environmental impact caused from storm water runoff to Lake Minnetonka. on. ed is i RR-lA SINGLE FAMILY UNSEWERED , Commencing at the Northwest corner of the City of Orono; thence Easterly along the North line of the Corporate Limits to the intersection of the North line and the center line of Wayzata Boulevard; thence Southeasterly along the center line, of Wayzata Boulevard to the center, line center line of , Wayzata Boulevard and Stubb's Bay Road; thence Southwesterly • •• • along' the’" center * line of Stubb* s Bay* road to it’s intersection * • with the center line of the Luce Line Trail; thence Northwesterly. along the center line of the Luce Line Trail to a line that is • » • * • * .’ . ■ ■ . ‘ . . parallel with and^50 feet West of the center line of Stubb's • Day Road; thence Southerly along said line to the center line of f. Bayside Road; thence Westerly and Southerly along the center line • . • of Bayside Road to the Corporate Limits of the City of Orono; thence Northerly along said Corporate Limits to the point of beginning. • m • \. . . • * • ; • V *• • •• •• • U•* •• • *•••* . • • • • •• • • • . • \ S* ^ ‘ . •t.*• • * iff #•**> ,* »' • v**t*’% •# •• «• I /'/ . <r LR-IA SINGLE FAMILY 2 ACRE UNSEWERED The following described property in Sections 2, A, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 25, 26, 35, and 36, Tov\TJship 117, Range 23; • • All of the South 1/2 of Section 2 lying Southerly of the Burlington Northern Railroad EXCEPT that which is within the • •. • •: • • ... .. • • City of Wayzata. • •• ^ That part of the South 1/2 of Section 4 lying Westerly and Southerly of County Road No. 84. All that part of the South 1/2 of Section 5, Township 117, Range. .. 23 lying easterly of Stubbs Bay, Northerly of Maxwell Bay and Northeasterly of the channel between Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay. That part of North 1/2 of Section 5, Township 117, Range 23 con- Sis^ing of Lots 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, • • • • • • « f 64 and that portion of Lots 37, and 40 and the East 750 feet of Lot 49. of*Auditor's Subdivision No. 203 lying Southerly of the Luce Line Trail. Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 of Bayside Addition, all of • • • •••'., , . . Bayview Park, Ottoville and Blocks 1 and 2, Hillside Park. . . • •. •. • • M ••• •• n • • •• • • iLw- -.A TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission ^ Council Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator April 27, 1977 John Burger - 3700 Bayside Road Subdivision (Preliminary) II H Request to subdivide 10+ acres into two lots exceeding 5 acres of dry, buildable land ea^. This is in the RR-IA zone - 5 acre minimum area. One lot contains a house. We ^ use the sinpler procedure on this if we accept the irregular lot lines and the variance from the 300 ft, lot width requirement at the location of the existing dwell< ing. The existing dwelling location does not meet setback requirements. I*ve sent copies of the proposal to the County, the City Staff including the Admiustrator, Attomey, Engineer, Finance Director, and Public Works Department for review, reports and recommendations to include in the proposal if necessary. A Park Dedication Fee of $500 would be forthcoming upon final approval ($250/lot). 1*11 be sending out notices for a Ptblic Hearing on May 16, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. PLANNING CX>MISSI(W - May 2, 1977 Discussed proposal as work session item. Scheduled public hearing for Kfay 16, 1977 at 7:30 p.m. PLANNING C(MHSSI0N MEETING - May 16, 1977 Comments hrard from applicant and neighbor Hazel Anderson, Concerned with continua tion of existing access easement for Mrs. Anderson across south edge of Burger's proposed west lot. Concerned with proposed easement thru east lot so west lot has access between portions split by wetlands. Mr. Burger stated that irregular let configuration is chie to having designed and located liis proposed dwelling prior to deciding where the lot would be split. Mr. Burger also stated tliat he would like to use one or more of his existing lots on and under Stulibs Bay for lake access and dockage for the proposed lot. He says that he no»^ has one dock here for the existing house. Recoiranended approval of the proposed division (preliminary) because each parcel would meet the 5 acre dry buildable minimum zoning requirement and that the variances for the existing house location and cast lot width arc justified by the existing lot contours and improvement locations, subject to payment of a park dedication fee. The Council should address the riparian rights to these lots. CaJNCIL MEETING - May 23, 1977 Approved preliminary plat subject to Planning Commission conditions. Added following conditions: (1) ^(2)y^(3) Applicant provide access for Hazel Anderson property (Lot 52). Conservation easement over wetlands. Rezoning to RR-M tliat part of his property currently zoned LR-L^ (that part of his property west of the west line of the Reidel Subdivision). I’l 't, r,:' Toj* in Oh- I.,.vthvo-.h l/., oi h-crllon •If1 ' V /■y.n \ S'SKjji “ ,“2o:ris™^ (iivi::i^:: I.v/.nor 2C;, Hr?..n'5pin County, lanneoota, the locu tier, oj- y.U cxistin,: huiiuinr.s t^erern, an;: xne ,.ro- ,;on'.n: loaxtion of a ;)ro.>oue:l bnUcir.; . It ccos not :jui*:)crt to shew ot:ier i:.iprovoronts cr oncx*C;(:.*i::!sr;ti;, ii ar.y. Wts^/f'nc 5.0 A<.r^i }J}r^/4 of Stc S-U7f5 buitc3<xt>le /and rr«pcf#J c/irn >;j:I - I \ -ft tA Q 5 2 5tAc.r<zt^ dfyy . hit k!^ S4'but ££ .^r n {•' -• ^ .. J ♦ •> ti t^oui'A tS£oA yC CoL f^^y 84 ^ OS Ar.i^LiUd hi fiOi-' on I., Coiii: h.rJ 'jui-.'O. or ■.r.<: t^l u:r;-.T .w.:-o, :.i:;n- sotxi Ljcale: '..V t<-. ; o : !•' r roc • - -'77 Iror. :w..rkor . • • « (n -t.0* v> n ^ y k SS<>^ Ifk w»*o F 9* ^ ^ JhkRfOA '*^apl V 1*01 4c M .-. "C) . ., I •JPRINOr^ ~' • 51! Cr 1^^I • %■; • -j:5. - ^ f: r:ir'' I*r- s'r-Ttt-rrO -r -rf : cr«l ?7t><5 «.*.<■ I ^ ' f ->aI [rs*if I OAK lesm^'ss- *iSo :4- ^'^25953 O n /- / - __________ y. STUBBS / ::4 4 --r :"; f VV-'' 'V% t /o)7“^ ^ S\> *'* ^ \ o no V 9,"* -i* "• .• i. o'- \ y.V /I?0 ^ I Ifio \ t u\ Z' ^ iV'‘ - / •'.’• . t-lO Ch.Cyft ' • •, »* k-'^e f? e4; , nV.'v.-, ■• -■ :. r 5 <x IT *— v\ •, •i; -> >\ ' v V'-’- y< t*-* Hi^\H lOOCjLjitf— o / / y i 1 ly>. •••• '••>•• • rHF.HI CA .■.i'Tr-ri-i-r . • : : I • I ; :\ •.rniNO - T T T -: -1 •" ■:’!vA.-i : : '\^:\ \ H • • • * ^ fV , * • * I • *^ ^ ~ ^ ^ » I (-ji I . . ; * • I o,-f> ■ ; 1 i • ; : 4- __________•- I- •• --• ; ! : r: : ; i h /' f A A ^ - r y « T — / !T / — -#5*72 4'V ‘ *• “ w»9 % STUBOS _ BAY on R(i . I - . “• • »];,}; TOWN -.A :,T<. -7 -.r-----:;y. - r —RP- •♦. i-4n\ w-| 1“ ' \ I w. 3 \ n'^* I V .1 NV.r-' >' I ^ \ m «>'.«*.\ >1 / • :\ oo \ » • • •a •• tt» «i» i\-,\ I V5 4 HMoiv r>» I 1 M “\h 1 ^ 1 iir-rt O f3 /I2 0 ■^*51.V,__OI'V3x>jtf \ \0k \ "“/no ! ......... CURTIS A. LEVANG, M.A. Licensed Psychologist October 16, 1986 Mayor Butler, Orono City Council, Orono Planning Conmission 1335 South Brown Road Orono, Minnesota ocraoeee Dear Mayor Butler, City Council and Planning Commission Members, Ue would like to voice our opposition to the proposal to develop the Burger-Miner property on Bayside Road in Orono. After receiving the public notice, attending the informal meeting sponsored by the developers, talking to DNR and LMCD officals, and meeting with fellow neighbors we strongly feel the proposal for a change in current zoning laws is not in our best interest. We hold to the opinion that the zoning laws were enacted to protect Orono against excessive development that would tax lake use and land sewage concerns. In our opinion just cause has not been shown for a deviation from the present zoning. We moved to Orono a little more than one and a half years ago to escape the crowded, noisy, unsafe neighborhood we lived in In Minneapolis. We bought a new home in Orono for its rural, uncongested lifestyle where five acre zoning insured the lifestyle we were willing to pay for via higher housing, utility, and tax costs. ■ We respectfully ask that you vote to retain the current zoning laws and thereby uphold the original Intent of the law as it sought to protect the City of Orono. Sincerely, Or. and Mrs. Curtis Levang 4010 Bayside Road South Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 476-4123 PSTITIOil We, the undersigned, petition the City of Orono to disallow the proposed sufedl^violwi of the Burger - Miner properties from the current zoning requiring five acres of dry land per lot to two acres per lot. NAME ADDRSoS lAAa^ /y/ ^ jL^j^ xi7 \^n S JLyfyL. 303^") 0-^ / C * r i f 16 • 1 ^y.K£^\y \ *^7*^ 18, Qam£3^ ^9* kkJ- *jyfJKR<^ JfA'^ gp^ 20, ^Cc^ cP (L.O ^ f>ccP 21.YLK/lil/l/V R % 1. '^/7!(/ii \•^WYX.-T^tLA^o €A .---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. ----- ------ i-ngjl i.r-tr--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -1 ^ *fO^O •'Ol 6, >^^^LgLAvjO<A^i^'Vj 7/ ---------------------------- 3"7?0 7. yt]jiki^Jl!p'\^^ 8. ^/il diV'«y\^Y mio Au.i^a,(i s. 9. 10% W6» th6 undcrsignGdy potition thG City of Orono to disdilov/ the proposGd rGZoning of the Burger-Miner properties from the current zoning requiring five acres of dry land per lot to two acres per lot. Name 1. Address L. \gy ~A i ca>w\ / S1 cL-v ) Phone # 7 V- O X7 cd 2. ^ /f//. i 4^2r~7?>i.Uh4uL'U. 3. Iaj A x Ju- P-'jIa JIJXI U-Vy ±73-7^1 <r -fjf /^^/ca lj 7=^. - iy < j ^ / V/// /^ ^ . 7/^<. <"f/ ; v';g5 - f:)v JlcJ /1 Vi /'rlrcR/,. Ltwj^k: A u 2 -/ ^/t*l L ^75-7 9 S-9 i ^ ______ iT? c i 5 rJl' /^J iPjrA'y^ J. ’^CT'CuyjLA } /7 c/ J ^ 73-/ / ac^ I ^f73~sQ / ^^Vrc/W(,< (/yO "T tr-tJv-/ r.c' (t Q1 13. 14. n t£2£i2M:l \U.'^ / )ri. y\;• I ^ V7^ 7?ylhuU( OrJ l/ljfrib'. 4V3-0^)C. 16• ‘^(t/iA \ J-ffj A (^Mr/;/-,______|>^^’ ('/ 18. KILL M,rcyv/v?'.j/? /fc ■3L f n " / //y /?9^/9 *7~^/3 . tX(f‘ ■>-< K^/147/^ ^/.y7 22./ii^AJ/l7 Jl 23. 24. 25. (p ^ d/§ (i ^ S''7v <2^ 7/- ^0 7»<; <^ ‘y ’//n iQj >-1 lK<y Li~n- 7 .1' /0!0 October 1986 We, the undersigned, petition the City of Orono to disallow the proposed rezoning of the Burger-Miner properties from the currrent zoning requiring five acres of dry land to two acres per lot. Name Address 1) 5) 3dtS' 7)tfmrn- 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) t. - X t. To Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Pr.Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: October 15, 1986 #1083 Thomas J* Bernier, Doug Klint and Gary Barr 3535 & 3545 Ivy Place and 3034 Casco Point Road - Renewal Subdivision Application For a Lot Line Rearrangement - Class II Status of Previous Subdivision Application: The original subdivision application #853 expired on February 25, 1986, The code provides for a one year deadline from the date Council grants approval of the preliminary plat for preparation and filing of the final plat. The applicants, once again, filed for a preliminary subdivision application on September 23, 1986. Review of Lot Line Rearrangement: Zoning District - LR-IC Area « 2.7 acres exclusive of road right-of-way Application = subdivision - per Section 11.03, Def. A plat has been required. 66 (b) List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Property Owners List Plat Map Original Property Ownership Resolution 1699 - Vacation Maple Avenue Violation Letter to Klint Council Minutes of 2/25/85 Bartikoski Note Preliminary Plat DNR Dredging Permit Prior to the filing of the original subdivision application, the applicants petitioned for the partial vacation of Maple Avenue. This was approved by the City on November 26, 1984 providing that applicants quit claim deed additional right-of-way for Ivy Place and grant access and utility easements over existing utility lines within the unimproved platted right-of- way. The resolution approving that vacation has been enclosed for your review and a plat map reflecting extent of the partial vacation (Exhibits D & E). % Zoning File #1083 October 15, 1986 Page 2 of 3 The proposed lot line rearrangement does not involve the creation of new lots but will provide riparian access to the Barr and Bernier properties. All newly proposed lots meet the required area and lot width standards of the LR-IC zoning district. Note each lot maintains 100+ feet of lineal feet of shoreline. All existing structures meet required setbacks from all newly proposed lot lines. The utility easements intersecting both the vacated roadway and Lot 1 have been designated as 20 feet in width as originally requested by City Engineer. A drainageway from Casco Circle that runs between the shared lot line of Lots 2 and 3 has been protected by requiring customary drainage and utility easements along interior lot lines by extending width from 5 feet to 10 feet. Once again, staff recommends approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement application of Bernier, Barr and Klint finding all standards of the LR-IC zoning district have been satisfied subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat to ‘eflect dedication of Ivy Place right-of- way via quit claim deed per Maple Avenue vacation - note the area of roadway shown on prelimary plat as "to be dedicated as road" has already been deeded to the City upon approval of Maple Avenue vacation. 2. Klint to complete sewer payment of $970.00 for connection to municipal sewer. Incorrectly charged $375.00 with building permit - total payment required of $1,345.00. Additional Comments - Current status of Three Properties: Staff would like to address two issues pertaining to the current status of these properties. The first matter involves Klint's dredging application with the DNR (review Exhibit J). Klint's contractor ran into major difficulties during the phase of the hauling of the spoils from the land base. It is my understanding that the contractor refuses to complete the dredging operation - DNR has recently advised the permit has been revoked. Staff has been monitoring the site for over three weeks since the dredging operation ceased. The spoils have been removed - the area used by the trucks has been severely disturbed and no attempt has been made by Klint to repair his property or the adjacent neighbor's property. Staff has been in contact with both DNR & MCWD regrading the enforcement of their permits. The MCWD knew nothing of the status of the project and the DNR had sent a field inspector out on the site. The disturbed lakeshore area remains unattended with no provisions for erosion control. Zoning File #1083 October 15, 1986 Page 3 of 3 Staff issued a citation to Doug Klint on 10/14/36 (review Exhibit F) the complete area must be restored prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Staff will report on the status of the violation at your meeting. The second issue involves the installation of two docks (on each of the newly proposed lakeshore Lots 2 & 3). Barr and Bernier constructed the docks without building permits. On the proposed Bernier lot, there are major railroad tie stairs/retaining walls constructed down the lakeshore bank without building permits nor the required conditional use permit/variances. It is very doubtful whether this type of stairs construction would have ever been approved by the City in light of the review standards established with recent similar applications. Staff has not been able to contact either Mr. Barr or Mr. Bernier as of this writing. Planning Commission may find it more appropriate to table this application until all appropriate applications have been filed. The docks are in violation and should be removed within a few weeks pending the oncoming winter. Applicants are placed on notice that docks cannot be reinstalled until the plat is finalized and approved by the Council. Staff did learn from Mr. Bernier in September that Barr and he both assumed Klint had completed the final plat and that all lots were legally defined. Bernier is renting the house and may not be aware that the renter constructed the dock and stairs. Mr. Bernier must file an after-the-fact conditional use permit or agree to remove the stairs before the Planning Commission can act on the preliminary subdivision application. Bernier should be advised that the current access stairs would never be approved and would have to be removed at any rate. CITY OP ORONO #1083 Date Rec'd 9 By ^ Fee SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM d > eta mbs APPLICANT Name 0- ^ /- > yj > (h'tC T7 ■ > ^/(},v :nD'3VA Telephone ' C<3//' Mailing Address PROPERTY Name Klhyf))ii. Telephone 9^'V-(^'f/6.- “™“ -pLi. &du' (>j. ArA (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address 6 95' 'dbic< j (// ^ Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application i EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size rj}.3 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Cnri^-nj/. /.an 4^ Residential; no. of units _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District / C PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes 9 Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:':5 G Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density /Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size:Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)X’Residential Other (specify) (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped r legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete• Zoning Officials Signature __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date /■ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date FEES . X Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I s II Subdivisions) $150.00 $250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $300.00 plus 20.00/lot Pinal Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00* Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature /.'V Date 9^^3-KC Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. •4fA • V >../ ! / -•' / / 'sy w;'i7<^r><*v •\ 'V .:* Cirri', X')S'-A'o‘ ^ -V V/ V 'R.L.S r.* v*^‘ OF L )r II \ r\\ B A tj: ‘Vcr >*•••'-«♦" ^ ^ \ '*y*'‘*' *<♦*'■'* v«^ 0.1115.'i&V- N? ijs/ «■> 19' B TTW •V V, K/*' ^•S2?«• X ,X| I' ^.\' MAf * •J'\ii 1984 ; / W4|‘ »\ ■'*.■CL «. 0- jQyRQl^ \N N ^0 s r 6^?‘.V;' ^ •I [^■1. I09 ( Z' ft A/ Y S'y J7,0.?W?7< 5^► /vV^ C*i /I07 IjV Jf / f A! \ • •< S.\" 45 ?l S ^I85 ^ .X'' >06 >05 / Ml/\ .\b ^ '?/' vX un: A'^ »IM4 y k\\ CM VC M^ o ^fO CL UJ Ul z y yo S S p CM U Ui UJ ^ ri:S53 CO to O O o <to o 11 to a CL a Ul Ui o o QQ < 5 lU UJ K t- < < H t- <0 10 to ft M^ o to a »J to O H CM U U4 • CO < iM Ul M (J M M 7 ggo < < CM m *i *i *4 O o o €0 to to O ft ft <^ o »o ft lO in 8E CO < -o < to ft ooo CM to CM I Io CM CO to Ui UJ Ma a D D -I M> CD CM < in t- in 3 ft < Z 3 r CO CO Ui UI O lOr r o -I < < CL-> n fv j: •» €0 ft to S^' to o CM U CO I M N < 01 M ft 8 o 3 M in o 8 n S“8-§* i *-35t»i o n O <^ MOM _ ch >•CO CM < O < to O o O CM ft UI ftft r o o < ft o 0 ft CM M to O N < ^ U 1 O CM O CM t- ui g >• 4* ^ ft ID UI ft Ui UI O CO ft O ^ -> U s o toinin o3 CM >• 9=^ ll^ UI < >• \ ft < UI UJ a 3 EXHIBIT Oo CM ^ e to CL CM P I V z N > •< 44 M > t < O CO CM O in CO in *J CO to CLto o z O' to in < Ul m •J u ft < oe -i Ul CL Z 01 £ >•a > < M I- V < ft o M ft in >- < in < -I to ft o ft CM tH^ u to o CM U I CO - to z in M in g O 5 u £ CO < - CM < to ft ooo CM to CM Ul Ulo o = 3§Io CM Ul UJ H t- t- t- CO CO O O -Hc^ CM to in •I UJ UJ UJ into CL in lo u CM CO lO - V -j> Z Z CL Z 44 1-4 CD CD Z Io CM -) -O > < M H ^ Kl in < < to >. o to ft ft in < to o u. u. to ft o 44o CM •J to CL CM I >• > 44 M 44 Io CM g> in CO to to o •J t- < h- K UJ UJ ft Uih- z t- 3 ^ X X t- ft < < to in Ul m u < > < t-4 t- < M> M >T >• in < to ft CM to CL CM ••• M 44 z z Ui Uiz r •H tHt- t- X X Ui Ui CM CO^ ft ft in u uCO to < 4Cto o -> -> UJ ft ft X O^ UJ ft ft X o n ^ ffV UJ ft X W nrK-J 3 Uk U Q Z Ul ? 3 ^ N . ft ^ UJ w 3 KS kis-s?ft ^ Ul A til A T* ^ Ulgzui ft < n_ La 1 ftIIPIk Ui Kk JU,iiP UW %U Ukm o- to in UJ in u 3 5 < M t- CO ^ >• in -< to 3 ft 0 1 Ui Ulu. ^ 1-4 CM ft oo •• CM Z ^ O -I lO to ft -I CM 1-4 44 M CD Ui to -j u in ►4 < in o CO Io CM Ui « X O ft in Ui ^ to h- to o lO Z > £Ui tH X O CL CO Z Ui o O t- in ft lO to o UJu. to M CM ft CM «J to ft CM A5 44 M 44 Io CM O 44 in CO to to o o o CO CO •j mj M tH 3 3 CO o P‘ Ul tou in CL UJ Ui X X CL ft Ui Ui t- t- 10 in M o CO Z o O in ft to o CM CM O VC UiCDCM to CL CM 5 •• S o •> 19 ft ft UiO o CM %0 44 in;^s Ul < CD M «J ft 4i M3 3 CO CM O in Ul CO •ju ft “I Ul N| > ^ O fto < Q X z CM UJo o tl ft Oo Ul O § tt K < liia Ui a riiai CM CM to CM I Io CM to K Z 5 ing K ^ in Ul Ul Z CO CO 4i K< < z z •J *J »H Pp o r o o ^ a in CM CM to CM I Ie CM COto Ul ft o < ft ooz^< ft < Ul CL Ui ft X I lA•n « M 6L • lUo o Q. s Ul OK «« 6Q — QC rssF KHWn’i lA a lA <A <\J Ul UJ • ► > > ^ >- m 3 m cn in2sy -^;55S5•o o •> •> »n 3 Io CM O to o <0 Kl Kl O O ^ QCm ® fcO z K> Oa m o CM U I cn f^ <^ u UJu. N4 O CA ft lA in=* fc ? o z X o u £ o in o ^ u in gt M 32 momm mo ft < CM u o -i I in ft ft li. < ft ft m ^ u ^ < c o ^ CD CD < O ft <ft X 1 O CD < <1 o UJ lu <o o u H o < M < O O <CM CO O ft <CM ^ ft ft m z m ON m V V m O O M o ft z m >•O ft ft •-4 UJ Ul o O m < o <O m < <o O O M> Ul m o M M m 3 m o o 13 m oo ftm iH »i ^ u < ►— m o Ul CM u I m K < ft M O UJ I HC o Ul CM O CM Ul CO m Ul in o ^ m Ul in zz m < o zUJ u £ X in •H < < Ul u Ko < N UJ r* >- UJ CM < -I m 3 ft m »H ^ u m o CM U I in < ^ u Ulu. M 3 U Uz z UJ UJ Io CM in o in CO in in o o o ft ft < < >c ^ u u UJ Ul Ul <^ -j m u in ft inIH u o z u c in •< - m < in 3 ft Ul I mmo CM ’'-im a CM I V > ^ M m4 I O CM CMm in CO in in o o < ^ ^ CD a M K O CD ft UJ Og ft ft If.m o ft I in h* <^ u UJ <_ o o z z o u £ r in CO in < M OH o o X O Z ft ^o H in H« O Ul o m mo H m m X in ^ ft . z m M M in ^ M in ►-m o < o m O ft CM U H z ft CM I m o in in ft ft ft ft < < CD CQ ft O 'Ar < oo CM Oo m M -I^ u < m o CM u I in K <-c u ►- ►- ft ft Ul UJ Z Z > <1 o I O ft I M m M H O O X O H o < ^<<O Ul UJ <CM O X CM CM 19 KD CM N Z O M >• V m N m >-o z X ^ V-ft ft >•CM lU UJ in <o m O o <s < <o Ul O m Ul UJ m 3 mo-)-) m 3 m iO ID X m o -J -J c^ in UJ ,in Z Siin 2? >- CM <m 3 in m M a m o CM u I in M o in ^ S I oo CM r CM «C CO inmoo in <o ^ Ul ^5 -j m cum o ft in < MX u -SiO m ^22 Z >• < CM < O m 3 5M CM Nm CM m a CM IK M U. i!s<n a > oa ft Ul M Z ftUJ > Ul A s ty in H 09 m in in r ->CO m 3 m o o H Ul in u in 3 “*a M «8 i sH 2 CMm Ulu. M o S S ro 2 o E tto li moo m m CM Io CM ft o£ U U O O u u in m •c -o sft tn 3 fto Km m Ul •j ft <u o O ft Mm<52H O C < .mmUt M)m o ft CM 1 o z in ?8aao K fi o &SS9 cn 5 ft r O flO < 1 1 oo o < << CM Ul «c m n H u.m momm o 13 o 9 < o X in h- o in m M CO o fto o oe ft CO m ^ m o o o Ul X S9 M ft ft X Olies ft < 1^ ft O E S ft m M ^ u m o CM u . tnK* •- o X -i mD u u in o o ft m *1 ^ M ^ «j u S 8 o z K o: u K ^ ^ K 2 U U <0 >- < < N < “> “> K» 3 iA tn ^ Ma • lii o o I Ui Qt r UJ in >in § M H h-in M u. 2 in M CK « o UIa >- o H CL Ui CL >- O ou z M UIs UI 5 <SI 1^ Xu H OH lU • UI § gs "A -A'-v-ruv?, o cn K.K**^ U V l*> o S S UI » ►- J Kl MUM b « M K M(Q -sim UI H in i>3;: SS” 5 o >- < fO^ in•^3 r 9 III S9 UI IL in o ►- a in O Ui U CO inI-u £ gu.ZM UI Ui O M UI H lu O >• Ui |ga < H z < o Z lu M Oa o UI Ui M Uih- in QC UI UI CK U CL UI M OC UI Z UI u. u. o o •Vf { » V ; V. '■t*. • J.- X .1m' City of ORONO & OKf-.-rf’.-rj RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1699_________ A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF MAPLE AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF SPRING PARK SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IN THE CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA ♦ # * WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 1984, Thomas Bernier, Gary Barr and Doug Klint filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a portion of Maple Avenue originally dedicated in the plat of Spring Park legally described as follows: That part of Maple Avenue lying Westerly and Southwesterly of a line drawn from the most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Ivy ■Estates, to the most Easterly corner of Lot 184, Taylor's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, and lying Northeasterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the Southerly corner of Tract V, Registered Land Survey No. 461, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence Southeasterly along the Southeasterly extension of the Southewesterly line of said Tract V to the centerline of said Maple Avenue; thence Southwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the Northwesterly extension of the Southwesterly line of Lot 161, Winship's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots; thence Southeasterly along said Northwesterly extension to the most Westerly corner of said Lot 161, and there ending. WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on June 18, 1984, regarding said vacation and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation, as proposed, is in keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following findings: 1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. 2.The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve or use the dedicated right-of-way as a road except for utilities and access purposes hereinafter described. Page 1 of 2 ‘ 1 r » ■ ligif City of OR-ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1699 3. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists serves no public purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Thomas Bernier, Gary Barr and Doug Klint is hereby granted and that the portion of Maple Avenue legally described above is hereby vacated. The granting of the petition is subject to the following conditions: 1.Upon vacation, Thomas Bernier and Doug Klint must combine the vacated portions of Maple Avenue with their respective homestead properties (Lot 1, Block 1 Ivy Estates and Lot 184 Taylor's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots). 2.Upon vacation, Doug Klint and Thomas Bernier must execute a utilities and access easement for existing municipal water and sewer lines that intersects the vacated portion of Maple Avenue, granting easement rights to the City over, under and above that vacated portion of Maple Avenue. 3.Upon vacation, Doug Klint will quit claim deed to the City additional right-of-way for Ivy Lane providing five (5) feet for maintenance ditch along travelled roadway. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held November 26, 1984. ATTEST: Dojfothy Mf/Hallih, City C^.erk Mary C. Bu Mayor \ Page 2 of 2 i • •• { \ / •• II «T i • I . < i * • ! I IT Y of o;ijaji Jl Off Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices \ 'V-v I I 4i«.» On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 14, 1986 Douglas Klint 1629 Bohn's Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: Property located at 3545 Ivy Place Dear Mr. Klint: The City of Orono, for the past month, has been monitoring the dredging operation at your above referenced property. In the original DNR application (permit #86-6309), seeking permission to dredge the lagoon area adjacent to your property, you advised that spoils were to be removed from the site and that no alteration of the land portion of your property was planned. The City was advised of the problems your contractor had with that project in the process of loading trucks from the land base and with the cooperation of your adjacent neighbor and the City of Orono, the spoils were removed. You, Mr. Klint, have failed to repair that portion of your lakeshore property and your adjacent neighbor's property severely disturbed by that hauling process. You have failed to provide the much needed erosion control along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. The condition has existed for over three weeks, not addressed by you, the responsible agent. You have violated Ordinance 10.22, Subdivision 2, enclosed for you review. A citation has been issued and enclosed in this letter. Please contact my office if you have any questions on the matter of this violation. BUILDING k ZONING > ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION k FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 Douglas Klint Re: 3545 Ivy Place October 14r 196 Page 2 of 2 The entire disturbed area must be regraded and ground cover restored by October 21, 1986. You must immediately install the necessary erosion control (silt fencing preferred, hay bales if needed along edge of shoreline). Erosion control must be installed by Friday, October 17, 1986, please call the Orono staff to make arrangements for the required inspection. Sincerely, Oi . /7)l A4'vual?3ftr Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator JAM/tln cc: Judy Boudreau, DNR Julie Johnson, MCWD Tom Barrett, City Attorney Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Melvin Kilbo, Police Chief Thomas J. Jacobs, Building Official John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator I >4 m * ■ I I I »-■ ■■•<■■11111 * 1 -ii I tifcfII llfc' ■ A k \ , ^ - -^ . , . ,*9 .1. ' (.i; • •*, (y MINUTES OE THE KEGUl.AK OHOK’O CODNCJ I. MEK’nNC. JIKl.l) EEIiKUAHY 2lt, I’AGE A c ^il8 53 DOUGLAS KLINT TOM BERNIER & GARY BARH 3535/3545 IVY PLACE & 3034 CASCO POINT RD SUBDIVISION There was no one present to represent the applicants. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that this application is a result of the vacation of Maple Avenue. Councilmeniber L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, to approve the plat of a lot line real 1 anceriient knon'n as Casco Cove finding all lots meet the standards of the LR-lC zoning district and that all existing structures meet the required setbacks for the district, with approva] subject to the condition that the plat be amended to reflect the City's ownership of that portion of Ivy Lane referred to on the preliminary plat as "to be dedicated as road". Motion, Aves (3), Nays vO). #872 BRECKENRIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP 1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1729*Acting Mayor Frahm moved. CounciImember L. Adams seconded, to adopt Resolution #1729, A Resolution Approving the Plat of BRECKENRIDGE. Motion, Ayes Nays (0).(3), #880 STEVEN RUCE 4625 WEST BRANCH ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR REFUND OF APPLICATION FEE Steven Ruce was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffrcn stated that at the last Council meeting, Steven Ruce's appi.ication v.’as placed cn Consent Agenda* and v?as approved but the request for the refund of the application fee was never addressed. # Steven Ruce noted that since his application ha.s such a minimal commercial" use with no retail sales activity on the property, he asked Council for a refund of the conditional use permit fee of $100. Ruce noted that this was also the Planning Commission's recommendation. Acting Mayor Frahm noted that the conditional use permit is protection for the City in order for the City to coitrol the level of commercial use on the property. Frahm noted that a 10 x 25* greenhouse could very easily become a u.ore intense commercial greenhouse with a future owner. City Attorney Radio stated that the fee is to pay for staff time spent in reviewing the application and also for the filing of the resolution in the chain of title. I 9 CITY OP ORONO NOTICE !i OCT I 41906 Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, October 20, 1986, at the matter of Thomas Bernier, Doug Klint, and Gary Barr s application for a proposed residential subdivision of a P?Le a"nd ?0?4TasTo "point Ro7aT^ All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. 8tafr2o“r^iew%hrplaii‘'^*®‘’' appointment with City of Orono By: Planning Commission Mon^®er'’"Nels;a;er."‘'® ^4., ux^6C iu».t ^ e^rv \y%lJL (yLiic4 UtyrtCJi^ / ( :^c.^::)- 3yi^yj U-h ■. Ct U'L^ ^yup. iT4 -5 9 >' 1, ;■/i: '1 PROPOSED SUBOIVION FOR 00U6 KLINT, TOM BERNIEf GARY BARR OF TRACT V, R.L S N0.46I, LOTS I. WINSHIPS SUB. OF SPRING PARK LOT 184 a FART OF 185 SPRING ■ lot I , BLOCK I , IVY ESTATES, . PART OF VACATED MAPLE AVi rc ^ rt j ' .4\ 10. Tnp permit ij permissive t»c liability shall be imposec upon or incurred by the State of Minnesota or any of its officers, aoents or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting hereof or on , account 0^ any carnage tc a'^v rc'son or property resulting from any act or omission of the permittee or any cf its agents, employees, cr contractors relating to any matter hereunder. This permit U not be construed as estopping or limiting any legal claims or right of action of any person other than the state against the permittee, its agents, emplcvecs, cr contractors, for any damage or injury resulting from any such act or omission, cr as estopping or limiting any legal claim t.i- right of action of the state against the permittee, its agents, employees, or contractors *or violation of or failure to comply with the permit or applicable provisions of lew. 11. No material excavated by authority of this permit nor material from any other source, except as specified herein, shall be placed on any portion of the bed of said waters which lies below (as indicated above). 12. Any extension of the surface of said waters resulting from work authorized by this permit shall become protected waters and left open and unobstructed for use by the public. 13. This permit does not obviate any reguirement for federal assent from the U.S. Corps of Engineers, 1135 U.S, Post Office and Custom House, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 14.The permat'*;ee shall comply with all rules, regulations, requirements or standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and other applicable federal, state or local agencies. 15. Permittee shall ensure that the contractor has received and thoroughly understands all conditions of this permit. 16.Excavated materials shall not be deposited or stored along side the protected water in d manner where the materials can be redeposited into the protected water by reasonable expected high water or storm runoff. 17.Existing erosion/sedimentation from surrounding hillside shall be corrected prior to the expiration date of this permit (November 30, 1986). cct USCOE Hennepin County SWCD Minnehaha Creek SWCD City of Orono Steve Oie, Fisheries LMCD Jim Konrad, C.O. St. Paul Waters Lake file (27-133) Authorized S^gatunft Title ............................Regional Hydrologist — Date i i Nl R. rr^department of NATURAL RESOURCES PEBMfT APPLICATION TO WORK IN PROTECTED WATERS OR WETLANDS IWClUDtNE DAM SAFTTYI PART A ► ► Please read instructions before attempting to complete this application OFFICE USE ONLY OA NO W{) SWCD DC/C Dw.D. DUSCOE 1.Applicant s fJ^me (Last.^st. M.l. 'i/f /as E- IH3TT \f Authorizea Agent (il apoiicaDie)Telephone Numoer&areaccxx ^ /A) Address. Governme _ ___ Zip Cooe) P/ocTS M SSJ9/ ictionsis)' ^ <iG( Fire No., Box No. or Project Address Township(s)Range(s) Counwil M A tm P a>i ‘watercourse Lot. Block. Project will affect Lake. Wetland or 7!:5,tSV"’“'7 >♦ JsL fOr II. PROPOSED PROJECT 111. PROJECT ATIEA □ fill XI excavate □ dam □ culvert □ drain □ construct □ lake □ wetland □ remove □ other (specify)□ wharf □ shoreline □ abandon □ bridge □ obstruction □ install □ harbor □ watercourse IV. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST □ riprap □ sand blanket ^ !).6d A □ channel □ permanent dock. □ shore-protection □ other (specify) • D.YC4* #fxS Am<Vi, 1 ■ ^ M1"- ij V. \n. BRIEF EXPUHATIOK OF PROJECT , jO 4^ ^ ^ -hi X u»oo\J JOU. MK ^rcA /A •Q>r 46l aCJw. e^‘f~_________’7S‘* ^ A JU^FICAT10lK(Exprairi why this project is needed) j .i ^ ^ i ^ J^. VII. T t L xvU M/..J .-K — w4;l w rvjsd h UjLir^.y»i I iA/^r M. 1m Vi'lLcf TAiS. jOy CA So A Acf/jf-^ ^mlllDNMENTAL IMPR^ (Anticipated changes to the water and related lane resources, including unavoidable but detrimental effects) > f-- Uitc/ yj}/^ve4c; i> \ / * *K- ■Hv\A. i(-y- L^iJlM WJ-C7 TVgryu. 7vJL^ A^>UL urcc'^» ALTERNATIVES (Other alternatives to the action proposed) nay^s'fK*- vx ^okU lEsisLm-(. )lej/p /h\ les^j-__________________________ IV maKeoDDlication putsuant to Minnesota Statutes Chaoier 105.42 ana all supDonmg rules tor a pennit to wont in or al vni. IX.I hereby maKewplication put^nt toMinn'esota Statutes Chaoier 105.42 and all supDonmg rules tor a permit to worn in or atieci tne aoove nameo proteaed water(s) in accordance with at' supporting maos, plans, and other .information suommed with this application. The information suommed and statements made STATE OF COUNTY OF MUUi Subscribed and sworn to before me tni^ day ol ______19 Signaiur/ot Owner or Arntterizeo ^egK^;r f r CP / Sigk^ture^Cfcrfsee Date My commission expires Distribution: ^AAAAAAVyAAAVUWSMAAAMAAAMAAAAAMV White: DNR 10.TIA.THEN I Blue: SWCD SDHRyPUBUC*MINNESOTA \ Green: Watershed District HENNEPIN COUNTY I GoldenrocJ: City or County IJyCHnmlsdoD Ellies Apr. 15, 1988 | Pink: Army Corps of Engineers *vvwwvvvvvvwwvvvvvvvv\~'A^ Canary; Applicant .MINT OI ,.!!rcr7/9', ' NA-0?670-04 F<ev «/ei NATURAL MSOURCIS LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT COMMENTS PART B Section \ (To be completed by aPDhr.ant) Name of African! ) . 7y,/f U\ ^ U i Quarter Sectionis) Sectipn(s)^ w vyuoi 1C ot;uiiuiiibi PROJECT LOCATION 1/ Aaoress (Street. RFp box^CyCity State 2ir. Coae) ^7 —^ Hangeis" " 3J~vs (ownsnipt' Project will atle^: (name and number ol lake, wetland, or watercourse) _______UjJik. /h )/^/f p ________ Couniy(ies) Acc >1 JTgp ; AT J ' hereby submit this application for permit to; (mark proper box) ^^appropriate water □work in protected waters MB mmm «aw mmmm mamm rnmmm rnrnmm mmm mmm mi Section II (To be completed by local unit ot government) Signature ot Appiicani Date X The following locai unit of government comments and/or recommendations are submitted for cons ’deration by the Department of Natural Resources* in the disposition of the referenced permit application. (YOUR RESPONSE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE DNR WITHIN 30 DAYS.) Water Appropriation Permit Applications are to be sent to the Central Of fice. St. Paul, and Protected Waters Permit Applications to the DNR Regional Office. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES). Spoi/^ 6h Cl'/y etfe d^CTM/- (f Pi Was the proposed project fieid inspected by this local unit cf government?□ no □yes (if Yes. give viewer's name) Viewer's Name Title Authorized Signature g. Al\t4UAX~ Title Date Telephone No.(Area Cooe) (fe/T.) »'73- 78jr» Nmne ol responding Soil and Water Conservation District. Watershed District. City or Cojnty Adoress (of the above named local unit of government) fnwp niv/lcirm n*. Wotprc orlfiroccoc on hPrWr^ (’ «• '•0»r % « • -• ■C.^ • • •• •• »m»»^ •»•<•'. *s •» t — ..4‘ ‘ - .1*. -;rv-r . ...-„..i:^':j^.-J^V,C^ • ^ *•.••# ^yf • ^ . r«» ••'* ••<*•' i:*/T *4 \t, - —.*•.•• •■jrf.”' “ -»i r.. 4 y .%'L ^ a^ ^ A^UkAA^O ^CtAA-A *. a.^zctw Jjjt^r » • •• • • • • ^^^Ate^yL AA»yAi - dAju^t^ * 22e-0^ r ti;-?9^ HCsJH^a r»-..*m«j< >•**;» »* * ‘ • •• • •♦.• - .- ^ ..•-. . * ‘ *# -•5^ .'5^'. -;~iC: dr *.*. :V« • • • • ^&^^6AyAf J lAA-U^ ^(a-o Z^AA SyLA-iiAif AA-OACA^i^ >A a*-X^ AAi<iy>^iA ^ TZaa^ \ QAA-UA^a/c^A. ? . -------- .••• tL. ^\ ‘ */v"U w n2‘>• . •• j • •. 1 • m • •% t >•.; -tf X* I • • •• • n" \ju n®iiO\y7@ « 4 4 t i: tI ! *4 OCT 201986 _______________________________ CITY CF OiTOi^lO____ ____ ____ _ _ ____________ «• •«•* «** (t.- -“I a r.*: •. / «.* ^ ■ I • :.:*. ..................... Tos Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:October 15, 1986 Subject: #1060 J.F. Fleischhacker, 2775 Shadywood Road - Variance - Second Review Additional Exhibits - Revised Deck Plan - Revised Deck Plan With Staff Notations - Letter of Explanation Discussion: Mr. Fleischhacker has revised his deck plans as directed by the Planning Commission at your August 18th meeting. Original Proposal Revised Proposal 75* Setback Encroachment 20' Avg. Setback Encroachment 10' 0-75' Existing Hardcover (10 s.f. or 0.1%) 0-75' Proposed 276 s.f. (3.7%) 75-250* Existing (6,253 s.f. or 38.1%) 75-250* Proposed 6,268 s.f. (38.1%) 9.5* 0* 177 s.f. (2.4%) 6,275 s.f. (38.2%) As you can see from the numbers and the drawing provided, the magnitude of encroachment into the 75' zone has been reduced substantially. The wide dash line shows the original proposal. (Note that staff's numbers reflect the 75* setback line a little bit nearer the house than the applicant's representation, based on the survey.) Staff Recommendation: The hardcover numbers include all of the decking, hence if a variance is granted for the revised proposal, staff recommends that the variance include the decks as hardcover. Mr. Fleischhacker expressed a concern about the spacing related to walking on it with spike high heels. Staff suggests he reduce the spacing to 1/4" but use more>narrower boards to maintain the maximum 12:1 board-to-space ratio, i.e. use 3" boards with 1/4" spacing, or 2" boards with 1/6" spacing (if a variance is granted for the hardcover, then the spacing won't be a factor - especially since most of the deck is over concrete patio anyway). If Planning Commission feels that the revised deck proposal is justified given the facts presented, then a recommendation for approval would be in order, making findings supportive of the recommendation. K? • V V r ' H ^ • ‘ic < «.r 0 h'. o > 4 r* /f A ^ 7^ — P/(^hn m /-S’ssAle f'!^I)t^ys / X F^ FUtscj^k(?-C s. Z?^?V- C>c,irob^y- /!^/^fc Sc^lJ f^€.^cye£'/^ poi^ voLi^/a.^^^ ^/o4>0 act ^ 7 *7^ S h ^acc>(. Pc{, %.: .. A fire he.^u^sf c*^^s f U<^ Au^c/si^ hee^x ^^c>-^*11yu-t^^ 'v<x\T‘iou^ U'o.ys ’iip t^ocfify oi^ir- cleclc p!c^^ ’iro f^c^uc'^. ^ h c.t^e?e^c,lf p frUe yS'fp, The. ^A/1 \^c^k^ia.f-/OH uuj^i'cl? a-^y^e/f^3 /yios't pi^a^otta^) yt-cfuces A/i€ ^t^Ck^aC>.C.l} f^'-CFn ^ yy^xF^X * ^O ff l^d Pt" cx-i^cf cj^irecx^ LA^i~f-/ifi^ frl\ e, serf~jtfo. c/q Ixa^s i?e^/i tre,tjtjce£t frc /ess r/-ita^h /^/ •^>* '^^' /7 ^^e.ye^~$^^ 7^ coueir^ (a^(L cz .o^h f^e/p iri-e Sct^eoj/ia^ iiy p^/^^ftc ui^iley’ trke ^f/^^e./ hejs U/Hk ^ (poiTcus uuklck ckcfes yxiir eo'^sir/'k^^ k*-^ Co\re,ir, 'TAe h-ecenf /fouy^df Mecis/c^^ reyav^J cfeck uJifA /ess -/rk^y^ ' hatk'J spoLCtny ^jr he^yA cov^e^^ ko-S k e. ^ pe.ir-f.ec/~ JZ.-'y. a,yv\p/e c^\/ eir- ki f I, ^ •f-CL/l of- /> pe\r kcuy j (h€Ak-ly \yvxpQ e)j toex/lJ he c>*xly 0^00'' !e.S$ irkoLh -k" yyxiytoffS, 7~5 i~t /oyfccx./ /~o sa~y ^Aa/ (Aj&.ie)r fp cl^e^ <^~cc ^osc c^ SLKLf ujculd Y^ois Ki/>^ irkyoo>yk ^ •k ctra-cliQ th Che yhihu/e*^ puy^flxeyn-i^^^e <sc^y\ you nrxcyfhe uj/iarf ^x.)au/A ka-ppiz.^ ff ore of //te /^^tex fh skoes y^ouicf Josk o uf « feck, i^t/k ^ ^p<xcn^y it\ response "to o~ e^y -fy-ot-yx ol. c^/tlof T /fe sps x!'c7^'Pu//y y COUNTY R0/4D NO. 13 X ^ck 7.00''X.-V-_ IRONY "■ Vs" 100.00 _,•» rr»7.oo c £ P T 1 0 N >. ® 4 .mS’S*'"" 55 i ________ i > — 5.30-: ' ONy T r _ ^ — -t ^ -IMS*; B KL; W^fL' Rosd Easerncnf orer Tr«ct F 43 per £^oc. Wo. 417271 I fO r#. UfHlf/ EaBiment a$ per Doc, 76307! ...........»\! \ 1 0fmp^' V > > ■•io *5 iiiiitf U ”” ? l-SrONY l^ALKOUT 2'' ''" BUILDING NO. 277S " (4.10 1.05 Overj Basemertf ftoor e/ei'.* en^ / \ ^ - ~ Vy sj V.s V ' wood deck -' 'IRON scale : r ‘‘ 30' SURVEY FOR: DESCRIPTION: JOSEPH F. FLEiSCHHACKER JIWW lOI^ IRON 5ft 'f! /y y a 4 OT e.$i w£f ° Tracts E and F and Tract G except the Nortt >^^^easterly 7 feet thereof. Registered Land Su No. 358, Files of Registrar of Titles, Count of Hennepin. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of i land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encrt ments, If any, from or on said land. Dated this 29th day of AAay, 1986. EGAN. FIELD & NOWAK, IN Surveyors by Minnesota Registration No. 9053 BENCH MARK: Top of standard brass disk on soi east wing wall of Bridge No. 275 Elevation ■ 951.57 feet (Sea Leve V Datum). Ottio!c5 ^he 323.40 contour I'me .f 2373-48 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986 #1059 BJORK CONTINUED Bellows stated that she had sympathy with the Bjork family however she failed to find a hardship involved other than financial. She feels that this property could be sold with a mother-in-law apartment. Goetten noted that the city is looking at an amendment regarding duplex use. She also noted the fact that this property has been assessed 2 sewer and 2 water units. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the property has only 1 meter. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend denial of the use of this structure as a duplex unit based on the fact that the owners have been on notice for the last ten years that this is not to be used as a rental or duplex unit. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Goetten and Hanson voted nay stating that staff should review possible legal remedies that may be available. Applicant was advised to work with staff on this problem before being heard by the Council. iJLOfiCUJ.F. FLBISCHBACKER ^2775 SBADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8s40 - 8:50 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Mr. Pleischhacker was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explaing the request for hardcover, average lakeshore setback, and structure in 0-75* setback zone variances to construct a two-level deck in order to gain access from their upper floor level to the rear yard without blocking any windows. Per his memo, applicant proposes to have a non-hardcover surface underneath deck and shrubbery screens the proposed deck from the most affected neighbor. Bellows stated that she felt there were ways to construct the stairway with less enfringement in the 75* setback area. 8 MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986#1060 FLEISCHHACKER CONTINUED Chairman Kelley stated that he did not feel the average lakeshore setback was an issue because of the screening by shrubbery but would rather the deck be constructed to stay behind the 75' line as much as possible. Based on Planning Commission's comments, Mr. Fleischhacker would like this matter tabled so he can come up with another plan to submit at the October Planning Commission meeting. It was moved by McDonald, seconded by Hanson, to table this application until the October meeting giving applicant direction to scale the deck back as much as possible. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1061 LARRY AND LINDA COOK 3765 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:57 - 9:05 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Larry and Linda Cook were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for a side setback variance to allow construction of a 20'x30' horse barn to be located 10* from the east lot line. The property to the east is the Butterfield Greenhouses. Chairman Kelley asked applicant why the barn is proposed to be located near the east lot line rather than centered on the property, where an 80-90' setback from both side lot lines is possible, and asked what are the the hardships involved. Mr. Cook stated that regardless of where they place the barn a variance is requires and based on this, they would like to preserve the continuity of the property to provide room for a pasture and riding ring. They proposed a 3 stall barn. Bellows stated that this is an extremely difficult piece of property and very definitely a rural area and she would rather have the barn be built closer to the greenhouse property, which is a commercial use, than center it on the property. Rovegno stated that he felt it should at least comply with setback requirements for a principal structure, which is 50' from lot line. ing ZONING PILE NO. 1060 CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box €6 Crystal Bay, MN NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 8/20/86 TO: J.P. Pleischhacker COPIES TO: 2775 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331 TYPE OP APPLICATION: XX Variance >ew DATE OF MEETING: 8/18/86 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Tabled: For reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDxTIONS: Tabled until October 20, 1986, to allow applicant time to revise proposal to eliminate or greatly reduce 0-75* encroachment • Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission Monday October 20, 1986 If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. Date: Planning Commission MembersMichael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator August 11, 1986 Subject: #1060 J.F. Fleischhacker, 2775 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR**1B Application - Variances for hardcover, average lakeshore setback, structure in 0-75* setback zone. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Proposed Deck Plans Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations Pertinent Facts: Hardcover 0-75* existing +/- 10 s.f. or 0.1% 0-75* proposed 276 s.f. or 3.7% 75-250* existing 6,253 s.f. or 38.1% 75-250* proposed 6,268 s.f. or 38.1% (with patio removal » 6,168 s.f. or 37.5%) Encroachment into 75* setback zone =20* Average lakeshore setback encroachment = approximately 10* Discussion: Applicants wish to construct a two-level deck in their lakeshore yard in order to gain access from their upper floor level to the rear yard without blocking any windows, hence their proposed design with a stairway system mostly in the 0-75* setback zone. Please read applicant*s letter of request. The structural encroachment into the 0-75* zone is about 20*, and encroachment into the average setback zone is about 10* (based on the curvature of the lake). Applleant*s letter indicates the deck is proposed to have non-hardcover surfaces underneath, and recent Council decisions indicate that 2nd-story decks with *5" board opening and permeable surfaces below will not be considered as hardcover. The portion of deck which extends into the average setback area is proposed to be 31*' above grade with a lattice skirt, and will surround the existing tree on the site. Staff*s site inspection indicates that existing shrubbery somewhat screens the proposed decks from the most affected neighbor, and no substantial view encroachments will be sustained. Staff Recommendation: The question here really comes down to how much of an encroachment into the 75* setback zone is justifiable. The upper deck total area is over 400 square feet. The lower deck/landing is over 100 s.f. Any recommendation for approval or partial approval should make findings justifying the magnitude of encroachment allowed, and should define standards for the 2nd story decking if it is to be considered non-hard cover, i.e. no future hardcover below or above deck, maximum 12:1 board width/space width ratio, minimim spaces *5". /T" I •-7^ ./X /aJ o O-yS 70 ;>Oytr r(£;pl /O ! lyi'^ 1 > f f ' .V < ;HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; J e r/_ni DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _^ ^a //' /^- d j\i e nr?_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ■c REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Date z' The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. :ict ling the tase ove :hat ^her To-r/.t mej-^j,eys c~f l-/l« PUniU»^R^auesi .vt Z77S sUJy^ccJ KA.F^ychi^ J F- F)i^iScJiJic^c./<^^^^ J ^'ers-ideidr. AHfiOc^jh ocij ^ ixcrt»-/A>ir^ '■'f ^ i'* i s //7 oF ■& s'toJpj^sj1<^<^ y ~tA€- ^ome o^ ih^ i^<x-iT/oiAfi-((L ~C lxa~t' ^ t'ctMpi'c.c^ 5^>. /, ^Uicfz. a-cc^^s -to hci^ck "Fhc*>\ TfA«e jc^k-e-SiAe oF ^l/f^ Aa^€2 afrij he.cc-us<F. oT -i h c. nui^^xhcR- o-f (z.k\l^veh cj F' F^'ietAj ^ ir£.fn,~t'H/^S ^*^y th ^^<=? lA^etde-f'^ sory^c. :So*d cs-F s~^a^ iycui>.y "pyo^rx ciur Jeck a Lso/otre yx <2ces 5tdy 9 la.y\a h A-yye.2, ho~i^£ e. yx^(K^ oJ a '^o i/^ <x ^ S p ^ d~t~ COyxytpQiy£f~^lyl^ p I ni.€ o u y S <2 ! \y€.S ~t~c aoyhi^ %.ip d lx ^ ^ i^e-C^k "iIxo-i.' luooIA p\roviA^ ct~ yeo-Jify S'ircutyxAja.y Pho-i' i^oo/d ho't fhPyty.^e <:> h d he Se’t-ha.ch. or<^iha.i^ce. ^ h^-h "to ho dj',.} / . I^ ^// /^Pec^ phdt C cola /J c o k>M7 (j'{'he sj'<^/*^o<jooIc { c^e.c€h^ di>^-€.c^fy Ih PuOht op uJihJ^u/S cy A^^chS OLhih LfOOUlA j) ^ i/h^ o u y jijo . "T~he. a^it o>-c h e. A pfo^tx ^pycst^nh^ hy 0(2 y proy>o5ed. huil{^€^^ ts {he l)e.dt c<yc ka-^e poahJ {la.P avc^u^S cl U -iUese ohjOchtc'/ii sPlI <JLCcon^hsl\es the foyjocse.* • A h^x^yy ^{yci^hk sltyuhhcyx {/>e jC^yy>{^{^ij/ ohscuy^3 c>o\r endrii^^ ha-ck yo^r-d pyoth tUe hei^khcys prcx^d^y' 7ft cuJcf,h'oi7, He Uf Phcy c>(- cuy vteyklcyd ho^e I's c^P o.pp^ox> tke So,me leyel the heljltt of huyetr ^cyffct, oP cuy propcjsed deck o-mJ tkerefore o^oAd h<y.\re c Icol ^ ytsfhfldy ijoke- y "fA e jeo-yes c^xe docjn )h ti^e i^adey-, Jp, JLe-ffe ftees h^fxyy skrukheyy heyn^ Almcst' ihy/j I i)}e Phom irhe lcLi<e‘ So {Its fP^'A^posed ^ddiftcfj u>c^id hcP he ohsxfJtkly •ft'Ctrx tIxa-P py/nt' ^-,-P » •S') hi/e. i^ I// he, yC.mco/i'yy 't'h e -^a-pio uhdet^- the d fey c^ t^^ay f 7 orxfejpiXnd the <? hof tny Ce.!Cu/af ehS f^thca-ke {het <*. Ire-iy fo^ll ct (,*' Jttfyy ujou! 4 -ft Hey iky%f Ake cyc>,cks ot ct "XAH- deck, tkeyehy yti Juc tk£Hi^^d_ccyyy_jji_tJlL£.7^7^£. »-' /* • ' »v •• $ . «*•^ r 0 m «• ^ , I ' -r • 'i 21-117-23-24-0005 Carlson, Paul C. 2735 Shadywood Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-24-0062/63 Cook, David C. 8012 Pennsylvania Rd. Bloomington, MN 55438 21-117-23-24-0022/25 Nutt, Paul 9200 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 21-117-23-24-0061 Thimmesh, John 3430 Florida Ave. N. Crystal, MN 55427 21-117-23-24-0028 Hoffman, David T. 2675 Pheasant Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-24-0034 Dunsheath, Douglas 2740 Shadywood Rd. F.xcelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-31-0003 Wilharm, George W. 2745 Shadywood Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-24-0040 Anderson, William A. 2760 Shadywood Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-24-0060 Wilhelm, Burnis & Doris 2765 Shadywood Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-24-0059 Ogle, R.G. 2771 Shadywood Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-24-0041 Bjorn, Ahlgren 2780 Shadywood Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-24-0054 Casey, Thomas J. 2785 Shadywood Rd, Excelsior, MN 55331 21-117-23-31-0002 Stein, R./Wolfenson, E. 2795 Shadywood Rd. Excel&ior, MN 55331 21-117-23-24-0042 Roelofs, Ronald H, 2800 Shadywood Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 i i oo ... 1 'll® rfiu =>«0 o ii.so; 5 rv .k Rosfll Eaaetnenf oyer Trsc-f F as per Ooc, No. 417271 NAIL oo ui<r> N • — ------------------------------------------------------------- ff. Vfilify Easement \ X i as per Dec. No. 733071 I K ,vJI >': 5 1 Cbcl^ *l> lA <4 .5 w\C rQ St 3 L JQ U C »l lA «) .■^ * • / si ^ V IROMykr2o^5~ /-5fef>s-- cncn esiv cn . -i ^ 1 i 64.«0 m/s.fJr / y yr y~y y ^ y j y y yIRON ft -' ................... 11.05 Oyerh'ano 4 / 0J>//^CArr-;c Ur iz~ ■ UyfF 1/ y 2- O - U y i, •!_ : » 1 /O X ‘ <• I (,.y Z'i-I • '/ .SURVEY FOR: DESCRIPTION: gij^ '•" . JOSEF T y y y y r . .. ._. 32.50 4f 3.25 ■* fc f <- 44»> f % 1-STORY WALKOUT n'^ BUILDING NO. 277S Tracts E and F and easterly 7 feet ther No. 358, Flies of R of Hennepin. We hereby certify that tl representation of a surv land above described anc buildings, if any, there ments, if any, from or ( sijDated this 29th day of M E G by F I E L^ \ ^ Minnesota BENCH MARK:Top of si east win Elevatioi Datum). X Denotes the 920.40 contour line • • V. .• 7. J • ^ • SEF ind her If R at t! urv anc ere or ( M I E * « >ota if si win itioi m). '4 * • ■ivr'Vi '1 « •! i'X V ' ’{ ■ 't' i i • ♦*. ^ __• 11*' yj •Vi ./ m- / %• /•. •*t • • •». • I I *, V' % " IqC'- —----------- • *.Ji V o 4,: ./ / !|vX- '•' •*• " •‘ !,l!M >:| . 'i J VD. i'^ H \.r.\ -- i: ■^'■T .11 I • / * ‘ ' '• •• . __________ — I % • \: n il)r N o in o in cva ro CO V X r*$ <M 4^4-< W (0 in w T < .i1^ "§ N ^ VO -if (V) V> A **j/0 € sf4-1 4-4inin(0 % X o m fc > ‘vO 4-<4^4-1tn0) r\ in in 1 j^ HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS 2775 Shadywood Road 0-75': Area * 7r500 s.f. - Existing Hardcover *= +/-10 s.f. (patio block) = 0.1% - Proposed Additional = 266 s.f. (includes patio, deck, and stairs, does not include planters within proposed deck) «= 3.6% Total Final Hardcover 0-75' = 276 s.f. or 3.7% 75-250*: Area (gross) = 17,500 s.f. Less 2/3 of 16' x 100' access road serving 2 other properties =* 17,500 - 1,067 « 16,433 s.f. net area Existing Hardcover House - 2,080 s.f. Patio/Deck * 420 s.f. Sidewalk *= 120 s.f. Blacktop (5x25)+(18xl05)+(7x23)+(7x25)+(l/3 of 16x100) 2,797 s.f. Rock Beds W/Plastic = 836 s.f. +/- TOTAL Existing 75-250 =* 6,253 s.f. * 38.1% To be added in 75-250' = 15 s.f. +/~ (most of new deck is over existing block patio or rock bed hardcover) 6,253 + 15 * 6,268/1,6433 = 38.2% If portion of patio not under deck is removed, there is a potential for up to 100 s.f. decrease in 75-250* hardcover for a potential final 75-250* hardcover of 37.5%. A' 'v: % 7 S ' tsro' - io-tn:: ^f. — ‘2S> '"l' Date: Subject: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator October 16, 1986 #1062 Ingeborg Cici, 875 Wayzac:a Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit & Commercial Site Plan Review Busy Beaver Day Care - Nursery List of Exhibits % Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit 1) 2) 3) 4) A - Day Care License Application B - Engineer's Original Access Proposal C - Staff Memo to Council Regarding Application #1077 D - Kilbo Memo E - 4 MCAR § 7.012 F - Access Design Plans G - Cook's Sketch of Left Turn Lane H - State Highway Plans I - Final Site Plan Packet Site Grading Plan Floor Plan Elevations Landscape Plan Second Review of Conditional Use Permit/C Application #1077 • j I I I M lercial Site Plan The variance to the moritorium was reviewed and approved by the Council at their October 13th meeting. The applicants were given the opportunity to address their concerns regarding the matter of their being responsible for the entire cost of the approved access lane and access drive as recommended by both the City Engineer and the State Highway Department. Council advised that the cost of the entire road improvement must be assumed by applicants. Council did approve the access location presented by Mr. Cici at their meeting but did ask that the staff have Glenn Cook review the design specifications/proposed elevations. Application #1062 The application was tabled pending receipt of final plans and additional information as follows: 1. Outside Play Area Student level is proposed at 67 - plans confirm 4,492 s.f. of fenced outside play areas - this would satify required area of 3,350 s.f. (50 x 67). Gates have been placed to the front of building on each side of the building as requested. m Zoning File #1062 October 16, 1986 Page 2 of 4 2. Final Site Grading and Drainage Plans Drainage has been redirected to the east and south - to the wetland area. Culverts have been sized and located taking drainage from west to east. 3. Building Elevations Exterior building materials are shown to be wood shakes, cedar lap siding and brick facing. Foundation will be of concrete blocks. 4. Site Plan Fire lane has been provided along entire front of building - parking stalls 13 total - 1 handicapped designated has been relocated along east and north sides of building - 2 fire lane signs will be posted at front corners (north/south) of building. 5. Current licensing information has been submitted (review Exhibit A). 6. Septic testing and design information has been submitted to staff. Gaffron confirms preliminary review of test data would permit the installation of a shallow trench system. Gaffron will reconfirm by making a test boring before approving final installation. 7. A formal landscape plan has been submitted with the final plans and shall be referred to as Landscaping Plan - page 4 of final plans. Staff recommends approval. 8. Signage Information ~ shown on page 1 - Site Grading Plans Per Section 10.62, Subdivision 2 (A) & (C) a) Location - Setback Required = 5' Proposed « 70* b) Area allowed With Conditional Use Permit Allowed = 12 s.f. Proposed *= 5.44 s.f. c) Height Allowed = 8' Proposed * 5* 9. Water Supply for Sprinkler System The follov.ing specifications have been provided: 40 H.F. 460 Volts 3 Phase - 500 G.P.M. 3500 R.P.M. - 7h” - 8" Cassing Staff has been advised that this will clearly satisfy minimum flow requirement of 500 G.P.M. Zoning File #1062 October 16, 1986 Page 3 of 4 10. Access - Final Review and Staff Recommendation Review Exhibit G. Staff has asked the State Highway Department to send a copy of the highway plans of the subject area for your information. Cook has reviewed the design specifications of the newly proposed access of Mr. Cici. Cook has asked that the grade proposed at the entrance be reduced to no more than 2% for the first 25 feet providing a safe graduated access to highway. The remaining grades beyond the first 25 feet are acceptable (Exhibits F). 11. Survey The survey does indeed exist - Mr. Cici presented it to Council with the access design sheets but failed to give it to the staff. The dry buildable area is confirmed at Sh dry contiguous acres. Staff will have the survey at our meeting and confirm elevation of wetlands redesignated by Corp of Engineers and setback of principal structure. 12. State Highway Access Permit. Mr. Cici has reapplied for a new access permit from the State Highway Department - the first access location was denied. Staff cannot issue a building permit until the current permit is processed and approved by the Highway Department. Mr. Moen has confirmed the permit is in the process of review and will be approved. Staff Recommendation: To recommend approval of the conditional use permit application and final site plans submitted by Ingeborg Cici for a proposed nursery school/day care center to continue to be referred to as the Busy Beavers Day Care per plans dated 9/10/86 by Pandeli Cici, a licensed engineer - Reg. No. 5880 consisting of Page 1 - Site Grading Plan, Page 2 - Floor Plan, Page 3 - Elevations, and Page 4 - Landscaping Plan based on the following findings: 1. Approval of a variance to the Limited Development Ordinance. 2. Day care use conforms to current RR-IB zoning standards. 3. The proposed location and conditions by which the day care center shall be used will have no detrimental effects on the public health, safety and welfare and will not be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The following conditions shall apply: a) Applicant must enter into a Developer ’s Agreement and post appropriate security to assure that the road shall be constructed per approved design standards - to include left turn lane with State Highway 12 and to assure that site grading and plantings have been completed per approved plans. f 3WOCO S ? r o o « » § -o25^ a ® g § i.a 5 m2 o°J S*SS5ci ° 3 ® !2 2 o I« iSS? 3 5 » 5. 5 <q 5 "S'? »o < 2* (n 8 a§. ^ca as* SS 2i 0 3 0) 1 tt 9.|S.8 2-IT gsl S' -• o"2(0 (D 3 Q|w SI 3 3 5 * m 3 a < O or O cn < (U 8 5- r'l o ? §r » O g-Q-o S' »g§ S 5r=?.<O o o w =; 3 a G. S'SL O =: 2 5.0. ' r 3 o> ^0) d ^ o (Q - Q> c 3 S 'o) 5 2.< =; <0 0 2 5^1 5 ^(t) 3 2 8-2 3 '~ O 0) 3 0) rOL ^ =r. O 3 3 ^S ^ ' S’ 5"g s ^</) 2 5 o> •D 5g 2* rL CD ^ o 25 *8 2, onR 9- 3 c 5 ' =; w 2:(0 2" 3 O 0) n 3 CO r*T* 30) y • 01 d ^ CD ^ ^. (D CD 2 o ? 2. =< s; ^ ?. trt 3: 3 Q-JT* ^ »-♦2. o> rr S . 0) DO*** *-► 3 Q> a; o 23 2. «2 o ^ 2 o <0 5^2<0=2 ™ ^ « S 1.2. •• •a 3 O C) 3 D 5 a CD Q. 0) □ □ □ □ i|fT> J/) □ □ □ </» M TJs s s 5 5 8 3 3 3 10 O 3 2. f <§ □□□□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□□□ I 2; > >y i? 7o 3 oS I «? 33^ O 3 £ -*• C 3 O So b 2 o ? □ 3 I I 8 §. S- 8 ? Ilf 8. •• • •• • • •*••• • «. ^S-ua-23 Zoning File #1077 October 9, 1986 Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation: Additional List of Exhibits Exhibit I - Kilbo Memo Exhibit J - Lynch Report Dated 9/11/86 The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of Mrs. Cici's variance to the Limited Development Ordinance per the staff recommendation on page two of this memo. Staff had originally planned to present the Cici project in a comprehensive review covering both the moratorium variance and conditional use permit/commercial site plan for the nursery school but the applicant has asked to address the Council on matters surrounding the access recommended by the reviewing staff. ff Council reviews the minutes of the September 15th Planning Commission meeting, access was clearly the major concern. Access to the site had to be deemed safe before the Commission could make the necessary finding that the public welfare would be safeguarded with the development of this property. The problem for the applicant is the realization that all construction costs for this new access road must be borne by the developer - this, of course, includes the left turn lane within the right-of-way of Highway 12 estimated by the Highway Department would be at a cost of approximately $30,000. The applicant and current owner of the property claim that such costs make the site impossible to develop and seek relief from the City. Staff has advised both applicant and owner that the City has never participated in the financing of road .improvements benefitting private development. Staff would suggest that road construction costs could be absorbed by additional uses of the property. The property consists of 6+ acres of dry buildable contiguous lands and provides a potential for 2 additional use units if planned carefully - note the majority of the road appears to be located in the defined wet areas along the east borders. Council Action: To give conceptual direction to staff to prepare a comprehensive approval resolution for both the variance to the Limited Development Ordinance and the conditional use permit/commercial site plan application for the day care use at the time the later application is ready for Council action. 5 r j V ! V i', )' r INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: TO: FROM: September 15, 1986 Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Chief Mel Kilbo SUBJECT: Day Care Center - Hwy. 12 & Luce Line This department has some concerns about the proposed day care center at Hwy. 12 and Luce Line. The eastbound speed, #12 (east sign by Lakeside Liquor) is 45 mph. The speed of cars by the time they reach the Luce Line is considerably higher. Further as you approach the driveway from the west is obscured by the Luce Line bridge, guard rails, and curve at Lindawood —the line of sight is less than 750 feet. Also from the east, there is a curve in Hwy. 12 that again limits vision of entrance to less than 750 feet. Without turn lanes, there is no place to stack cars making turns into the day care driveway. 750 feet is the usual limit of visibility used by the State to govern passing, hillcrests, and other maneuvers. Hopefully, an entrance further to the east can be worked out. ; 4 r f 4MCAR § 7.012 2. A licensee shall not submit a materially false ®^*tement or fail to disclose a material fact requested in connection with his application for certification or licensure in this state or any other state. 3. A licensee shall not further the application for certification or licensure of another person known by him to be unqualified in respect to character, education, or other relevant factor. 4. A licensee shall not; a. circumvent a Rule of Professional Conduct through actions of another; b. engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude; c. engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; d. engage in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice his profession; e. permit his name or seal to be affi.xed to plans, specifications or other documents which were not prepared by him or under his di»*ect supervision. B. Conflict c interest. 1. A licensee shall avoid accepting a commission where duty to the client, or the public, would conflict with the personal interest of the licensee or the interest of another Prior to accepting such employment, the licensee shall disclose to a prospective client such facts as may give rise to a conflict of interest. 2. A licensee shall not accept compensation for services relating or pertaining to the same project from more than one party unless there is a unity of interest between or among the parties to the project and unless the licensee makes full disclosure and obtains the express consent o£ all parties from whom compensation will be received. 3. A licensee shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit or accept any compensation, gratuity, or item of value from contractors, their agents or other persons dealing with the client or employer in connection with the work for which the licensee has been retained without the knowledge and approval o: the client or the employer. / C. Improper solicitation of employment. I » 1. A licensee shall seek and engage in only the professional work or employment the professional is competent and qualified to perform by reason of education, training or experience. \ 2. licensee j extent of his educatic to any person or to tl extent of his responsi employment. 3. A licensee a or allow to be transmi or misleading ir.format training, or experienc associates, or joint v 4. A licensee s pay, directly or indir whether in the form of inducement to secure e from paying a commissi securing a salaried po D. False or malicj false or malicipus st£ directly or indirectly personal or professior member of his professi E. Knowledge of im; 1. A 'licensee t believing that anothei statute or rule reguli have the duty of pres; 2. A licensee, violation on the part authorized representat to conduct an official divulge such informati F. Action by other without restoration of suspension of the cert another jurisdiction, Minnesota would const! shall be deemed to be Conduct. Any licensee of competent jurisdict competency, be deemed profession within the 326.11, subd. 2. C.* Employment on tl employer, shall refrair practice prohibited by business, employ profet merit. m if' ■ ■ •wru /= 'cn 'ir O ^5H cl ,-V*6m. '} v /T'’ •'rr*--'- ■ ■ ■ *';S -v*i' • m i ,• j mm DESCRIPTION: • . • •ri'!' j- That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 35, !towi$niBlii,, the 5th Principal Meridian described as<fo1'^Korth. w. 01 to. StO p--. , Beginning at a point on the W line of said SE 1/4 of• the .$£-1/4 North of the NEly line of the right of way of the Great Nortlieni.ii Company; thence N along the H line of said SE 1/4 of SC 1/4 to'the-St-1 the right of way of the Electric Short Line Railway Coopany; therce.CVy the South line of said Electric Short Line Railway Cbaipany to the SMly 1 State Hwy. 12, formerly Mo. 10; thence SEly along said Sifly. line of Highway to a point distant 38S feet measured at right oodles.from the of Section 35; thence Mly parallel with and distant 3B5 feet m-. __ _ _ _ _ _ .... measured at » s';angles from the S line of said Section 35. a disunca of 1011.05 feet t<point of beginning. ALSO, all that part of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of,Section 35/118/23 ly*' of the SEly right of way line of the Electric Shori Line Railway Coananwi... MEly of the NEly right of way line of the Great JCortlier/i.Ralljny;CoBpany*||- PARCEL AREA! 512.005 SR.ft.or 11.754 Ac. .j . . . j • .• we*AREA LESS METLANO; 2S0.600 •R.ft,; or ,5.78. ^ ‘i j’.jW > V r. ■> Vf *t{? .♦ »1|S* ft ' ;V’li .”•' ' •'{ . ''1*' ^ «4- ■ li ■ ■ :'■ ■ 4^ AXVjC, lOt.M I .* f •• .«. t. \ * m k.3^-« 4 *»«‘i *' • i --I t. 'Jif v}^ t •;.;!■•» .| ' «..JI ^ I.., ,p..i k 'r-;:* j -f.V.r:' •^f-’ i • « y~ .1--* y I ■i: <iu P vi ’f r*’rt'- O' trr^' . i4A * £■r - u. i:- ^/];Y r...u|:A r---’ •/Mfkyr-*; 'i '/f *. 4 ..'. J.4.: ■‘■->-i5r:-4., ■'.i-K;/!, ,-v.-j^-.j.y;. < r y>:rii • tp|-‘ -1 yf.tj ■ *rr *«• J* a 4i.‘* ^ *-*• •j I-H-...^j HV Ntlfevj -'.4 t; * .i- - V .j. .... L t ♦ I *f - -..>*%* ...•.». .. •«.•... 1... /* . ^i • !•*• ‘r. ;# ♦. .'t ^ ‘' U >)]li'\ j' ->v V V ^ * A jr>t* [ - T I- * •/ i'r IN ., • 4 . , , • . ^ t J .-ll 11:;^ * • f* ••*•, 1 5* f r- •r .* .•...,*• j . i • • ; • • '■ 1 * ■• . < • « , . « f« .• • •• r i », f *'»• . .4»'4 •♦■• J ‘I ' ‘S»7 i < '/ .1- K*^ \-k^' __ '"iW^ ..^.j ’ • } . •; • * ........t • •I. m'*4 • <•*• •* *••• • I • .. .... .. .■• ■•» ^K' ■U I i t ;•• ! -p • r* ••r**'• •• I ’ * •••••■*• ** i » • k ' . **'• ( ■9'\, • k- ■m:im i'a^H-XTi.t't,^' ! ■> r .ij' .I".- \'i r — ' * • t tm, • • • . • V • • * »i “ ^ . j*V.' ' “.s *-i.: :./.k:^.^:t.*!. : • ’ > t I; i •■*•■'• ■■-■'pr.rr -• f J- -• t '... I, i j.i,;■-• i ! I ’■f* • 7 I f • r . 4- *1 *♦ I I ^ ? ' -c^; *.1 j. A # ... {a ’l • •• ■ t’ \'! ' ’'f-N \ , . , j... I .i,J . . ; . { 1 1 '; * \ ’• * ^ ,1- * ^ .•w* ,*)« 4* • ’■ J I* t.i * f’ n i. '. ^ . , . .. ’ « «. •• • -♦ » • «'^ .i, *v . *• I i 4., » 1 r •i f :* 't JO \rii •». ». 4 4 »4. 4 ►•'j • 4 ^ M'4 ■ ♦» >-k *1 » V ** ’ -r.^ • ■*7J.:; T » ? * I ‘ I l;,* .. t“*- r*^ , ; • . . !..M < ■ ' • .'r-■ ^?5;-!~4'R;t'F H •?• r > . — r « .. p..«-« .1 . IT r - • »-| *4*.* * 4 t -In J'4 Jiv J* .{^ pi V,. u j J x%\ ^ f r. • ' ! ! •? • .ft' >. V.4 • J t, ^4 r pSUr i ;:t cnK-piNv ' , , i i:\ \r,:P-; vr -;..hPV •h4-^-rTj^-' *'**• J T***'*" .'Tp^^r***^.'* Y,^*' .* • ’.'r .V%1 .... ,..» . . • f %- • ; . . »,;.>. , . ■ . i„, . . I '. ■■ . *1 »\ ■ . . . I . 4..,.f! *-x» • --.'--I-'--r T * * V .* :.*' x ’»’ ly 4 ‘ * - » • .i.iM..',,-i5 .. ..; I.'V o -t :*"T:rV ,,, .. .^ •». • < •. ‘ ♦ . i. 1: m » V-. /• ^ 1 f ’'f> . « 4^ 7 J '■’ '*{ - \. *. • V .. . , - . ««r., r.< * i A -V. !/* V.A-71 ♦ M To: From: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:October 17r 1986 i * Subject: #1070 Richard Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road - Variance - Second Review The applicant has submitted an updated survey showing that the existing garage slab is 0.6' from the lot line at the northeast corner and 1.5' at the southeast corner of the slab. The roof of the proposed garage can be constructed so that there is no encroachment over the lot line. City Engineer, Glenn Cook, looked at this property on 10/16/86. He felt that, given the location of the septic tanks and drainfield, and given the topography of the lot, the only other feasible location for a garage would be directly behind the house (see sketch). The problems with that location however, are three fold: 1. eliminates or greatly reduces view of back yard from picture window; 2. requires slab over what is relatively new fill, or would have unusually deep foundation wall at south side to reach stable soil; 3. because the driveway access to Old Long Lake Road has poor sight distance, it is important to be able to provide a back-up apron on the property. Under the central garage location, this would require filling the area where the "ramp" is now, and extending the ramp further south where it might affect the drainfield area (see sketch). This would also possibly encroach on existing mature trees to the rear. Staff Recommendation: Given that the affected neighbor has Ok'd the project, that the slab is within the property boundaries and the garage can be built without being over the lot line, given the apparent potential problems with other locations on the property, and given that it appears from a safety stand point that it would be preferable to be able to drive forward onto Old Long Lake Road, staff has less problems with this proposal than were expressed in our original review. The magnitude of the variance is still extreme, but the justification for the request is more apparent. If the Planning Commission feels the facts and hardships presented justify granting of the variances, then a resolution for approval would be in order. This item will be scheduled for the October 27th Council meeting. re CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Prepared for:R ichard R inchart C Ikiih hnc if Ci’J fl ik Jr %\ %.oo V' OLD LONG LAKE ROAD': Goui/f fi'jMflfwii lif»c tl Old U^i /i Lokc Rocd <>— - It :s y I / / - HA The West 90 feet of that part of the East ^ of the Southeast ^ of Section 35, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North of Highway 12, except road. 24.0 ^ I A.. 24 0 V# ~V GENERAL NOTES: o Denotes iron monument "x** Denotes cross chiseled in concrete X93I.3 Denotes existing spot elevation 1967) Denotes proposed spot elevation -- - Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denote proposed features Solid contour lines denote existing features I Proposed top of foundation ele^ • Proposed basement floor elev. ■ Proposed garage floor elev* « BENCHMARK: ALL-METRO LAND SDRVEYORS 2340 Oqnisit Strict Long Lake 9 Minnccoto 55356 Ph: 475-1433 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wis prepared by roe or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the S.,tA^e-o£. Minnesota. ' J I'UrrJ__________ DATE \ohhk REG. NUMBER /7(3^5 scale 30‘ BUOK page 1 file no 84073 -B n i To;Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Pr(Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date September 12, 1986 Subject: #1070 Richard Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB Application - Side setback variance to construct attached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Site Plan Survey Enlarged, With Details Pertinent Facts: The Building Inspector has given his opinion that this garage, to be connected to the residence at a point by a concrete block wall, is considered as an attached garage. Side setback required: Side setback proposed: 0-2' (Slab not surveyed, no dimension indicating skewness of house on lot. Slab might be over the line, for all we know.) 24'x24* Concrete slab, 9'6”x24' apron were poured without permits, applicant asked inspector to come out to review burning permit, construction without permit was noted and stopped at that time. Concrete block you see on the slab is not mortared and is being stored until such time construction continues. . . Discussion: The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to construct an attached 24'x 24' mansonry garage. He commenced construction without permits, claims he wasn't aware he needed one. Then, when staff discovered the slab, applicant researched and found his survey showed the lot line extremely close to rear of slab. Zoning File #1070 September 12, 1986 Page 2 Note that if the slab is more than 2' from the lot line, as a slab only it is a non-encroachment, but ^ considered a structure requiring a permit. If a garage is built on it, it is definitely an encroachment into the side yard setback, needing a variance. Applicant claims that this is the only feasible site for a garage, given the topography and septic location, unless major amounts of fill and grading are done. The septic tank certainly does impact the location to a degree, and any work past the existing 5* drop-off will likely affect the drainfield. However, considering the extent of work done to create a flat parking area with poured concrete all along the 5-foot drop-off and a concrete ramp to the lower level, it seems to me that better planning could have allowed the garage to be placed directly south of the house with no encroachment on the setbacks, but this would have eliminated the use of the single existing tuckunder garage. The neighboring property owner, Bruce Dayton, has written a note of approval of the garage location. Staff remains unconvinced of the actual lot line location behind the garage. Drainage from the property is generally to the east and south at the garage location. It appears that the swale between the properties is about 10* into Dayton's lot. The additional run-off onto Dayton's lot as a result of the garage is minor, and gutters along the rear of the garage would require the added run-off to virtually none. Staff Recommendation: Given the site conditions prior to the slab construction, staff feels that there are better alternatives for a garage on this site, but none which still allow ready access to the existing garage. With the extensive site work recently done (i.e. concrete slabs next to the 5* drop-off), it seems that a 24'x24‘ garage could be placed directly south of the house, opening to the west. Please view the garage site if possible. Do you find any justification for granting the side setback variance for the garage on the existing slab? If you do approve this, staff would recommend an updated survey prior to construction, showing the actual lot line and verifying the setback to the slab. pc. ^ /S' A <L O CA T? _• t I I i » •< i .*N / /^n\.' V ■. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ JT» * -y . I ' /c (B , ,.r- M r CITY OF ORONO - V/^IANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Doublt application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address JO c Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name T^\ [Cf\ii')r\cx o-l W > eVva.'ft X/«.c.,Awj Phone 4-”73 "iSO 3 Mailing Address " (D\<d L-ot-^LgLa Qck. LO ct_v-, OWNER Name (^icJnoL rA fi) v^e Via Phone 4 73 - 5 Mailing Address ^fiS-0\A Lon^ ):<? fo. LOcQ^;2^-4t? Date Property Acquired ^ //<?7'2,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (^o no^l) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ Present Use of Property I & ^^l^^e^dential^ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ A-^^CO' Describe request in detail; 3^Ae ^A\c>cxj:.\^ 4q (ro^\gtYu^.‘ (T74^6.V\ec^ ^ (J_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front _ _ _ Hardcover VC Side Rear) » HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulationsf:> p <7:^10;-=*~Q>v^ Ci^t M'tcf'.JL ^ ei-'i p r~ ^ :Vt> i(o? DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Regurrements» ^CTL^ '4'i^ rH~ 4jV «r7rXIZI I r,r^i4-,'r,,-, ^ 1 . , ,-i .A ^4»AjL-P V OX" . REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. V. ^ 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 2 5 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4,. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature eXfOL^cP Date j^C~^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. ♦ ' n«anaitw.a^T«it mfiinfM 5 m • _______L:_____ A*^ k. •••C»'li.■.noU iJ 1 ^3^^'’-i- 1 [j (j.''-o CD 't V. tf o|. BJ (e4lT s ^ CAST ITO ^ 5 BIO 6^ ^ OOC *(0 3»9M*4 \sr t « t 4* » // f .< c n • I A*.-.** # ^ I** r.*/' •) J V / 4. /<-'J r f ,,r-f i-if-.r^ long Lake Road Cs^^if^rltn^ tr^y'^h 'St 0 I I 'S ( s\ •s. I I VC'.ri- I ‘ I ' I \. 2^r 1 1 i t I ^ ' iTr. A-:! : vV,£JtfC I I B..y~ .'j.' I / ________' / y Jv 0 fp' Plat of furvoy for Rjrh/ird C. Rinehart in the Southeast 1//, of S».*ction 35-l.lP~23 Hennepin Ccunty, Minncsot/i Certificate of Survey: ] horeb>" certify that this is a true and correct representatlcn of A rur'/ey of the bovj:(iarier of the West •IC feet of that p.*»rt cf th*' :>>: t half of the Southeast quarter cf Section 351 Tounrhip IIS, Ptan^e 23, Hennepin Cfjunty, Minnesota, lyinq North’of riirhuay 12, SXCSPT read, and of the locaticn of nil buildlr/;:s thereon, and all visible encroach ments, if nny, except line fences, from or on said lend. This surv'oy is made crJy in connection with a rjortfafc loan now belnp: placed cn the property; and no liability is assumed except to the holder of such nortraf»c or nny other interest ac quired by renaon of such mortrarc. It is unders^;>od and npreod no monu ments have bc.;n placed for the p\n*- pore cf entablinhinr lot lines or boundary erners. Ko attempt vis made t.o locate a temi;orirv portable shod n-v. located on the i roperty. Gordon R. Coffin 6cy<4 Land Curv'cyor and Planner Lonp Lake, Minnesota Scale: 1“ = 50' Date ; 6-29-72 A I Sire PLAf^ €A/4r A A(2ie.0los /<oC>tCAT^ r;ciST//OG Cor* \ Wes* >al! ^ Soc"! J Henr ^ Norl and the] meni fror is mor1 I of iCdsf- /{ */U- of Sec//£fri 3S'f/3 the ass\ ; 990 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-7979 August 15, 1986 Mr. Richard Rinehart 985 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Dick: You have informed me that the garage which you have constructed is less than 10 feet from my property line and hence requires a variance. I willingly grant my approval of this variance, but this agreement between us applies to your new garage structure only. With best regards. e B. Dayton .A. To: Date: Subject Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 16, 1986 #1078 John B. Massopust, 440 Brown Road South Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB Application - Excavate and fill to create a more suitable water fowl pond from existing pond - not a designated wetland. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Pertinent Facts: Application/Letter of Request/Agreement Plat Map Property Owners List Excavation/Pill Plans Survey/TopographyA^etland Airphoto Overlay This is not a designated wetland. Existing pond is a low area that holds water, apparently more this year than in other years, as indicated by inundated trees at perimeter, but no cattails. It is possible that pond outlet may have previously existed but was filled in somewhat by excess material when private road was built. Pond is at very high point in Lake Minnetonka watershed, has insignificant value as storage or nutrient retention area by virtue of a fairly small influent watershed. Proposal to excavate and fill indicates there will not be an overflow outlet, hence design is to capture and hold the entire current runoff inflow - this will actually be a benefit to the Lake Minnetonka watershed. 1 Zoning File #1078 October 16/ 1986 Page 2 of 2 Discussion: City Engineer/ Glenn Cook/ reviewed the site with applicant on 10/16/86. Cook noted that the water is apparently higher than it has been in the past as evidenced by large trees not standing in the water. The property contains many dead or dying trees at the perimeter of the pond and the proposed excavation of the pond and spoil disposal at the perimeter will help to "dress-up" the pond/ make it more functional and attractive to waterfowl/ and retain the entire runoff from the pond's watershed. Applicant notes he has omitted islands or nesting sites because they may become an attractive nuisance to his children. Staff Recommendation: Given Glenn Cook's favorable comments and support of the project/ staff recommends approval per the proposed plans. All dredge spoils must remain on the site at the perimeter of the pond. Vegetation to be re-established around the pond as soon as is feasible. No need for special erosion protection measures is anticipated. Applicant is advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to determine whether they will require a permit/ although this project would not appear to be of the magnitude or consequence normally requiring MCWD review. i [/ PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District 1. Residential Present Use of Property 2. Raw Land Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Excavate low-lying wetlands with a drag line or other earth moving equipment to create water fowl pond. Approximate size of pond shall be 80* x 60* and it will have a depth of 3 1/2 to 5 feet. The approximate location of the pond is shown on the attached plat map REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plans, if applicable. 6. Plat Nap. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of hi^/h^ knowledge. Applicant's signature _0 / OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of thLs reqpest. ') Owner's signature 'J 'Date 2. y /Partner,Longridge Associates Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. i r .r 1 u 440 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 August 29, 1986 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Land Use Application 440 Brown Road South Dear Ms. Mabusth: As we have previously discussed, I would like to upgrade the "mud hole" that sits directly below my home into a wildlife pond that will provide a suitable habitat for wildlife and be more aesthetically pleasing. This low lying area is not a designated wetland. Pursuant to your suggestion, I have contacted the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Coiservation Service, and have contacted one of their sugcested "earth moving vendors" to perform the work. The application has been signed by both myself and Duncan MacMillan, as partner of Longridge Associates, since the low lying area actually extends onto their property as well as mine. For your information, I have enclosed a copy of our agreement with Longridge Associates. We intend to perform the work this fall so the pond will be able to accumulate the spring runoff. I have enclosed the following documentation, together with a check for $200.00, to facilitate your consideration of my request. 1. Completed application form; 2. Certified Property Owners List; JL 1 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth — 8/29/86 3.Stamped, legal-size envelopes (/^10) pre-addressed to each of the above property owners; 4.A sketch of the proposed construction; and 5.The relevant section of the plat map with an "X" marked at the approximate location of the low lying area.i Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal. If I can be of further assistance, or if you need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me (home - 473-2424; office - 349-8540). truly yours. John B. Massopust JBM/nml Enclosures t ■ i V f P AGREEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement”) made the 6th day of June, 1986 by and between John and Linda Massopust ("Massopusts") and Longridge Associates, a Minnesota General Partnership ("Longridge"). RECITALS: Massopusts own a parcel of property located at 440 South Brown Road, Orono, Minnesota (the "Property"). The Property is adjacent to land owned by Longridge (the "Longridge Property"). There is a pond on the Property which extends onto the Longridge Property. Massopusts desire to upgrade the pond, at their expense, require that Longridge join in applying for City of Orono permission in order to do so. and Massopusts represent that this is the only permission required and Longridge is agreeable to joining in applying for such permission. AGREEMENT: 1. Longridge will sign with Massopusts, the General Land Use Application which the Massopusts will present to the City of Orono seeking permission to upgrade the pond. 2. Massopusts will do all necessary and pay all costs and expenses associated with the application and the work of upgrading the pond. 3. The work is to commence promptly*upon receiving the City of Orono permission and continue to prompt conclusion (estimated to be accomplished within three weeks of commencing). 4. The work is to be accomplished with reasonably minimal intrusion upon the Longridge property and in a manner that will preserve the natural setting. 5. Massopusts agree to indemnify Longridge and its partners against all expense liability or loss that they or any of them may sustain arising out of this upgrading of the pond project. LONGRIDGE ASSOCIATES, a Minnesota General Partnership --/r//LtLLy. // ^ohn E. Massopust / # I . ^ V.V \ * I ■'•. / • - j W. Duncan MacMillan, Partner Linda Massopust *%V«W • «||^i-rw7^;:5 UlWVfl^ • i\u 4 \ 1 5 A A ---------. , .. Oi K> ^ SfMa w § UJo <o. r-§ UJor 3 CM I K Im ooo K> CM I I Kl O g S CO CM !;& ou ^M -J a <r£ M o inx: UJ o m 22 ^ a o CD o CD< < lU (/) Z Z O O -JO O CL lU UJ X OL Z H lil K -> CO CO UJ CM .□ M a -j u M o H CO CO UJo CJ Mo UJoaM CLo S|§ O -i UJ o in CD O 10 -j ro -I O' “Si UJ CD CO O O r*CL N OL r )) ooo «J < HUJ CM to CM Z Z o o CL CL 33 SS O' to LO lO ^ -J ^ H-co Iro r z < < M M ^ .J Xou. CO#o M M 3 3 o CO CO < K < Kl >- < CM O Oo CM<r r- tO CO CM I Xo -H iU -i z < o H CL Ul o O'ro LO LO I too o CO CO ^ ro o g CL 3 < 3 < 3 CO 5 M M 3 2< oS si )))*)) ^ a *) ro o 3UJ 3 CO CM to CM I h* < S M M3 3a CD < 3 'O LOto LO LO I too 3 •O Z UJ 3 X< o o < CO to tt >- CD ^ 3 193 O Z < CM O -J ^ -I Oo CM to CM I >— COo3 OCO gj.o CO < CO to LO (O LO < z Z M u. O 3 I too •0 CD CO to «Q joio -> -0 o < 3 H ‘“;5o >- <r < ^ 3 Zz r UJ z 3 UJ ooo oo Zu H < CD < H O t- to ro •-4 CD 3oCOCOoCOCOCD »-4 sOoiuUJOoUJLUozoLOor-H <•-4 o r-H o 3 •H o Kl <<o O'<<X o LOtoMM3ro»-4 M M CM O ro CM O LO #-4 U u LO O u o 09 3 LO 3 <o o >-LO H O o <r CO LO LU oroCOCOHro CO (o CO <r ro M ro O 3 3CMCOCOCMCOCOlOCMMaQCM<UJ g1<<M 1 X <<c o LO 1 M LU 3 1 oNogooN•■ir •> • 4» •-i LU LiJ u«X 5*^ro ■-4 r Z Z 3 CD O LU O o o CK •-4 X •J 3 X 1 O o z <1 <z 1 UJ z o <1 < a CD <ro M M H to cn tn X z ro 3 LU 3 to •Jo33<o o CJ o o o CU t-CD <O o«>-CO«o O CO o N o M M CD CO co N 3 to CO >-<-<3 rn o >•O 3 O \CO O o LO <CO —•3 3 o a CO 3 fO <CO <CJ oKl•J 3 ro o U CJ a z to UJ X 3 to -J .u yj X O UJ 3 LU 3 Ul 3 LU 3 •-4 3 a 3 r a 3 z O 3 %- 4^OLUoO3oo«(3 a r.i •c 3 Cj a <3 a t-o O •»#UJ <a UJ a • K UJ o lU < < <-<>-\<>•\<>- O X 3 <LiJ 3 <UJ a <(UJ 3 <IUualiJaaUJaj:a 111 tL % ••* •a II a Z-r ^ •r-o ^ -X -(o X •?o • 9 >:• t o » 0 #X -L fK :c •»#tx • #-c z a :i •c CL :c •t • ^ U CD u u H tx O H u o t-u o r- i immi iiTi*riT'.yMAaom-'An hnwnrkVi*«ii lijiT APPROWMAlE RiND AR€A AND CROSS SECTION 1078 r —■ X—\;- I—^ \ I ^ \ . ^ O ^ \# I ’ V I • , ' ' •*' LI • » ^ . \i''i K"--.'.; r^V* *.' ■• ■ -' b ' / o ^ .1 ___ S." ^X.M> g-'^ / '• , • ! / ✓ ,t.0S8 .*• « " / , y I / / /' ' .• ' ' U ^ ' ' /:' 17 '-------------- A' ^' 'V'/ ;i -i • •• • .0. Si S. Q t: VS VA W >1 t s:;i in V VI s. 0 V '• ^ c>* -5 S .*<J »»t 5 I •X3 I VA V) C 1 t: v^ VI 0 \> 1 I <3 Q ♦. ^CO 0 t £ait ^o « ^ u. I §s s K it*5i: 2 8 2.^3 N 89* 55' 5 7" E rtify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of ies of Lot .1, Block 1, STRONGHOLD, the location of all existing if any, tnoreon, and the proposed location cf a proposed building, .purport to show any other improvements nr rmr m .^rhmont c S 'rDP06fSAPK)OVL (_/o'cc^re>^ {) NORTHER=1 -"CTl - :i n Long Ldke-jh ’} (BM < '1 ' ) 5 J- ’'OnC a ■^— o I o V., \ I ^ hs J y. A^ Ip ->> »^V 0.^,5 G ^ \ r? I/. ;'y :o * - -r^' I ^ Calvin 'O >1 V • a -t: 'iJV-'" ati* ..... V T i 9A9 / tit I, ( :. . . kiU*« O". •: ■ ^I's :Hto^-'d ■' '■*v ■/ '^-V-vV - = \ aiiU \ •> .A •CounlnrCl '.•'.0/ 4 ..1X> — -a. . av. \ •**• __ I '>j\ 'i . / . ■> <i€p /b ia jt ‘\\^V ___--* ..i* •\ C ' *"" '<^^C 7^y r Tanager Lake \ ..// ^ y \ . V*.' > ■£ U-- ■£;-:^v S. "^^se <Q,ir^ i:z>fa(r.• - •.■•. . . • •.■ •• • ■ V a••«' S;-':’. r .■■'v| .^'^^;' : '4^‘•'%:'^ ---’^ •-•■i\'-'-■■‘'•'A ■■- V ' \ ■ i.;. ^;W-;4^ .'^ •'■'•- • *\ ■ ..r’-\ -•.' \''\ ' :• •v ;• ^ v\ :. \. •■ ■< ------'• N. A, V . A \ : \ V ■ V 6 ■ • //'vv'-’-v''■■• ” '..\ V-- V" -..A ’■ ■ .;■ ^A’ \' r: '^'■ A?. i ■j.\':;k' .. A AAa' \ V -N • "-\- (^ •■ V- ; i - •• • A. t”: ■ Ov-——‘\ V —— I ■• *. - ■«* • • *•*••• V V •'• • •-"• • • • •. ;■• I • •. • '•• *, ^ 0. r , \ ^ ^ i ’• ^ • • • ■ *# * J * *u.rv- - : ‘ ■•.■''A. - ‘ ■ ' i.^ . ^ • '...•• •■ f .;• ••• , . •' ■ ,* ■' V • . , ' *• - '■■ .• •• ••. •• I •■' ••' •• • . '. .. ‘ • t \-'A. A' \'^' A -•■ • \: A*. A A •. • ;• V • • * * ' . . • .* • . • t r A * ■•■■ *•• •■' •■•< •' • , ;•. .■ ' »;•. ';■ • • /i-*: tv • . . .. •; V**; •• ■«^ • . * •* . • • • • »• ■** • * • .* • / > "S•' 1 • • ’'Afe->JW» 1. • s mm !5 ^exff. £ \/ 200 f% I ' 0 \ V V •*-f' 2^51.49 l?gs-....^ ♦ V* :*-+v ^ i‘» \ ‘1 4' . .V '.• ' i 'w '^v’’>.. •. »* (302sy ’v«. A.o /^ ' '* > w' . * »_ ' ■ \' 7fti :i? V/, :/' i. -vi^'vTv' ft >• V -* •. ’ »* »• A’* - ‘ - ' • 4 ‘ •• ’ .«• . / \ • ' . 4 ' • ' •-* . f w * •* ♦ *. «4 4 ko .' »• 'A w'V 'K, » •. ‘I M \ -V iV* ^■■; • i'-v 4V ‘*i •\ \ »..' V. . • . 'V A•• '; < - -».. V Av ; • •. * j: . ’ A ' V‘V 'I• • « ' , " V \\ .♦•* ‘ ‘^. . * i .' ' • ' . y* ' '^V ’•'*%„.* • ‘. ••. V'-: ; • «•• .v"^ 'V'-’ V‘V - . S - '.v ' .1 \ '.■■'■■ V < -lW** • '/» S'. ‘ ^ ^ ' ^4‘ ^ ;*, . '• • • ■ . 0. ^• • » 4 '» > i 4 . »S . • 4^4 <t ■•. ■V ‘ 3 'J U].T»^' 4 •: \ .4 */ - \ r - Irj ■'<:Yvf'V’ .. V- Yv-Y^''v" s' • 4‘ r - 1 I A' • * ' V \ ( %I* • • r T'‘* /’ ’OX'*r -4 1*12 «W ^ ^POND To:Mary Butler» Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson# City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Proa:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:October 14r 1986 Subject: #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road Variance - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Survey With Average Setback, Hardcover Hardcover Calculations Plan, Elevation Views of Proposed Addition Letter to Applicant 9/8/86 Variances Requested: Side Setback *Lakeshore Setb Avg. Setback Hardcover 0-75* Required Existing Proposed Variance 10*9.5*9.5*0.5* or 5% k 75*77*61*14* encroachment 1.5*17.5*17.5* 0%41.9%46.3%(46.3%) 25%43.1%43.7%(18.7%) * Including Variance for Structure in 0-75* Zone Pertinent Pacts: 1. Permits have been issued for interior remodeling and work within boundaries of existing structure not in 0-75* zone. 2. No comments as of this writing from affected neighbor, John Kust at 3355 Crystal Bay Road. 3. For purpose of hardcover calculations, 20*x50* paved roadway is excluded from calculations. Discussion: This is an extremely small lot on Crystal Bay Road, typical of the developed lots in the neighborhood. The applicant wishes to add a screen porch and deck to the existing house, but the southeast additions would be mostly in the 0-75* setback zone. The screen porch would be mainly over existing driveway, the deck portion over what is grass now. Both the screen porch and deck would be at the second level (or just above the basement level). li''b. t Zoning File #1081 October 14, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Because of the small lot size and proximity of the house to the lake, the hardcover percentages are relatively high compared to other properties in the neighborhood that have been granted recent variances: 0-75’75-250' #748 3399 Crystal Bay Sandra George Road (driveway only)29% #842 3415 Crystal Zimmerman Bay Road (driveway only)28.5% #871 3435 Crystal Mielenz Bay Road (driveway only)36% #901 3393 Crystal Karl Johnson Bay Road 37.6%44% This Application -Maxfield 46.3%43.7% There does not appear to be a substantial amount of hardcover that could be removed, i.e. no rock beds with plastic. It appears that the entire graveled driveway area is used, and there is only a single garage^ hence expect parking in the driveway. Staff Recomnend&tion: In order to recommend approval. Planning Commission must make the findings that: a) n^ii^hkbor's view, light, air, and open space is not encroached upon substantially by the extention towards the lake or at the side lot line; b) there is a hardship to the property that justifies the encroach ments into the 75' setback zone and encroachments of additional 0-75* and 75-250* hardcover. In order to recommend denial. Planning Commission should make opposite findings, suggesting that the encroachements are substantial and there is no hardship to justify granting the request. li he I r * »i .f a CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION /^f. / / / ' ^ /4 4^ ^ 5^ •Sx<y~J 78- Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 33JH SSl^f •) /9~ /lO-Jl 3- V/ -cx'tjoT' Please check one - Is the property _ _ abstract or ^ torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Ia/#Phone Mailing Address fU- SS3^ I OWNER Name 4 ‘f4«\cL iL<a>^___________Phone I —____ Mailing Address 335^ SS3^I Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) ^o no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY * Present Zoning District _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ i!^DOO/ Describe request in detail: /U A<.cfc.. 0 Jl a ! -J i <3 ~ D»v o-t- ho.;f g-t » * VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Lot Width X Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front A Side _ _ _ Rear) Other » » ru • J 7?‘ led on 3, ^cc|c» HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations <5/0 !0"i'-5 A ■4-r\V^ -e^ - I*' O DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS r r ■ Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning C^e Requirements; ■Uovj^ L-/- .S^^K /o-/j. ^ I J . _ _ / . ^ ^ ■ # " /—zzo—r:—/ •° c/o.S-» -I-^ t\ •v/J It / 3 « o/L, yr^ 11 InoK. 4-^ ^ 64^/L g.<^■eJ^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 'o j / 0 A.« . 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return aadx'c??^. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as reguired* ^ • 5. Plat Map. M The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE this application. Please not complete if the above The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date 9 \ r » The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date ^ X) Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. a < o a* N ^ CO CD < K lA N •H O oUJ lA >-ro>->-rv>-CVJCK ro < CD lA 2 <Q »A < < ro < rt O -> -7 lA 3 CO CSJ ^ o EXHIBIT E HARDCOVER REVIEW 3359 Crystal Bay Road Zoning Pile #1081 Lot Area Total = 50 x 128 Lot Area 0-75* = 75 x 50 Less Area of Paved Road Lot Area 75-250' 0-75* Hardcover Existing: Driveway 24 x 47 * Dock Stairs 3 x 3 « * 6,400 s.f, = 3,750 s.f. = 3,750 - 1,000 = 2,750 s.f. ~ 2,650 s.f. 1,128 s.f. (loose gravel) 24 s.f. 1,152/2,750 = 41.9% existing 0-75' Proposed: as above, plus portion of screen porch Over Grass = 8x12 « 96) 24+96-H,152 * 1,272 Plus New Sidewalk to Serve Stairway 3'x8' * 241/ 1,272/2,750 46.3% proposed 0 - , .. . . . . . . ." ' -7«; • ] 75-250* Hardcover Existing: House 22.2x41.2 Fireplace 1.7x6.1 Rear Stairs 3x15 Sidewalk (4x10) (3x16) (2x20) Driveway 2 x 22 = 915 s.f. = 10 s.f. * 45 s.f. * 128 s.f. * 44 s.f. 1,142/2,650 43.1% existing 75-250* Proposed: above, plus 2*x8* section that is now grass 1,142+16 = 1,158/2,650 «f43.7% proposed 75-250* / ttBMKdiL; 13 , 7I I GUARDRAILS -|< 36 ” MIN. HEIGHT yt *I. ^•■ /’ MAX* OPENINGS T® ir-*' :- ■■■' • .? .■•, /. •'- T i ■ i.L J- r» • I , : V/•>;•'■ ■■ 4<^y^.' / r(V Wt'ffU-o i \ • ’/. t: Xi ^■till r. " #** ri \ '•>; \ ■ .r- \ i -^~*v MtfT Acp&rOMBX> ssoEQaaBai^ i < n«y /- -n----------^ ^ BFEKS STAiBS 8. PORCHES All Structural Menibers Must Be Approved : Wood Of Natural Resistance To Decay Or Treated Wood. '-] ; i > guardrails 36 ” M'N. H^®HT y' MAX. OPENING5 « 4^«. M •»A ‘ i 4 • - •• t »;r ' F I - !, k ■ .‘=^, • ................4.,- i: *» ' »« . i- !i ‘•.* *•!. STAIRS MAX. RISER 9" MIN. Tl , ^ 6'-6" MIN. HEADROOM AT LEAST ONE HANDRAIL REQUIl GUARDRAIL OPEN SIDES ---- PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION EQUAL TO IMSOTH ATTIC AREA. IF 50% OR MORE IS PROVIDED IN UPPER PORTION OF ROOF AND REMAINDER IS PROVIDED 1N SOFFirVENTS, IT MAY BE REDUCED Tp 1/300TH ATTIC AREA._____________ ^ *«• 1. I guard 36 ” MIN. »• MAX. OI r- --jTnriTnT!.jrjlir ! ;M 1 ri • • i i ; i,' ^__-UJJlJjJLu'a., .”T —’ I !i t r # * f '_________XJ-t-# ‘*1 u ^1^ 1 )]r, » <<V)#P f t i*^ », . V ^1 1 . j ;1 »/■^-1 :f GUARDRAILS 36” MIN. HEIGHT r MAX. OPENINGS r ■■i>^ *Vv y ;- . V f •' f i * »• % • f r i"/ •/ • Ntfr \/AiiAU^C^ ty/ » i // .1 nFP.KS, STaiRS & PORCHES Ait Structural Members Must Be Approved Wood Of Natural Resistance To Decay Or _ _ - ^ 1 . . _ i if* t I i f C- guardrails 36 ” MIN. HEIGHT gr’ MAX. OPENING A'i Treated Wood.: • i « I * • • * • t % i| if ». »• ■ • r ^ r*-' «■t-! STAIRS i r. !I*V * "11 * I* - * ~ •n :! j :I 'I ^ B" fAAX. RISER 9" MIN. TRE| f:, !• 6'-6" MIN. HEADROOM AT LEAST ONE HANDRAIL REQUI guardrail open sides PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION EQUAL TO inSOTH ATTIC AREA. IF 50% OR MORE IS PROVIDED IN UPPER PORTION OF ROOF AND REMAINDER IS PROVIDED r • GUAl^l s,'^,%’S’S«s TO J/3MTH attic 1rSc.O-^°*^CE0 ;. Provide 2 Layers Of 15LB ■C' Felt Solid Mopped Together ''24”jnside EXT. Wall Line 36 ” For-Wood Shingles Or S ^ • STAIF ^AX. RISER 9 6'-6" MIN. HEi ArLEAST ONE HANC ‘ ‘ GUARDRAIL O ^ r «# «•• . . • _ _ TWIN Cities |v-;uvf. .:• *••.s.‘•:.••?; Vi; -: [' Vf'.- ;*|V. I-! •>'j i. n CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka September 8, 1986 Gregory Long 3359 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: Proposed Addition - Deck and Screen Porch Dear Mr• Long: We are in receipt of your proposal to construct a deck and screen porch addition to your residence. However, I regret to inform you that your proposal does not meet with the performance standards of the Orono Municipal Zoning Code in the following respects: 1. Proposed deck and screen porch constitutv*^ approximately 275 square feet of structural hardcover (impervious surfaces) in the 0-75 lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover or structure is allowed by code. r* posed structure constitutes approximately 75 square feet additional structural hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone for a 75-250* hardcover total of at least 36% where a maximum of 25% hardcover is normally allowed. 3. A small portion of the addition will encroach into the required 10* side yard setback area. While I realize that a large portion of the deck and porch may be located over the existing driveway area. City staff does not have the authority to issue permits for the extreme encroachments you propose. . 1 wish to pursue the issuance of a permit you must make an application to the Planning Commission and City Council for the spp^op^^ifite variances. I have enclosed the forms and requirements necessary for that application. If we were to receive the complete required submittals no later than September 26, 1986. a Public Hearing could be scheduled before the Planning Commission on OT NotLbe'r im.** potential approval by City Council BUILDING it ZONING - 473-7357 ASSI-SSING ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 >NO Ipal Offices Gregory Long September 8, 1986 Page 2 of 2 he I must Inform you that I don't view your request as a "sure bet" based on past Council actions regarding similar requests. I suaaest Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/tln cc: Northwestern Builders 8053 E. Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, MN 55420 3-7359 Bt" B8t to ’.f* Date:ID ifc - ^4 To, The Members of the Planning Commission, and City Council, of the City of Orono, Minnesota. Subject: Proposed addition (deck & screen Porch) to the residence of Gregory and Pam Long, located at 3359 Crystal Bay Road, Wayzata, MN 55391 Please note the following: 1. We own a residence located on Crystal Bay Road, and therefore, reside in close proximity to 3359 Crystal Bay Rd. 2. We have reviewed the plans submitted by the Longs for the proposed variance. 3. We find nothing objectionable to the proposed building and feel it would indeed enhance the Long property and our entire Neighborhood. Therefore, we urge the planning commission and the city council to approve the requested variance. As the property owners on Crystal Bay Rd. are restricted by older homes, extremely narrow lots, railroad property to the rear of our lots, and zoning laws, we appreciate your continued efforts to work with us in granting variences for the maintenance and improvement of our properties. Address: i '■ I-' Date: j 0 ' Z ® ^ To, The Members of the Planning Commission, and City Council, of the City of Orono, Minnesota. Subject: Proposed addition (deck & screen Porch) to the residence of Gregory and Pam Long, located at 3359 Crystal Bay Road, Wayzata, MN 55391 Please note the following: 1. We own a residence located on Crystal Bay Road, and therefore, reside in close proximity to 3359 Crystal Bay Rd. 2. We have reviewed the plans submitted by the Longs for the proposed variance. 3. We find nothing objectionable to the proposed building and feel it would indeed enhance the Long property and our entire Neighborhood. Therefore, we urge the planning commission and the city council to approve the requested variance. As the property owners on Crystal Bay Rd. are restricted by older homes, extremely narrow lots, railroad property to the rear of our lots, and zoning laws, we appreciate your continued efforts to work with us in granting variences for the maintenance and improvement of our properties. Sincerely, S'3 4-^ 0 / Address: 4 / Tb: Date: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 17, 1986 Subject: #1082 John F. Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle - Conditional Use Permit ~ Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB Application - Conditional use permit for grading/excavating to create a storage pond for flood control purposes. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey/Grading Plan Staff Letter 5/29/84 MCWD Letter 8/26/86 Topography of Sub-watershed Above Pond Air Photo Section Description of need project - The applicants are proposing to create a storage pond to collect runoff from the occasional "gully washer" that inundates their backyard for 12 to 48 hour periods. The upstream watershed has been calculated by staff at about 17 acres, the runoff from which is apparently very rapid due to steeper slopes upstream. After flowing through the culvert under Old Crystal Bay Road the watershed flattens out in Dougan's backyard, which is not a designated wetland and which, prior to construction of the White Oak Circle development, was cropland. There apparently exist some old agricultural tiles which drain Dougan's backyard further to the east, and staff has surmised that these tiles, although not located, may be near the surface. In a heavy rainfall, Dougan's backyard fills up to as much as 12-18" deep with water, then in a period of 12 to 48 hours it disappears without a clear overland channelization. We do know that when the water gets high enough it flows eastward through neighbor Marier's backyard and then southeast toward the cul-de-sac, but there must be some underground tiling that removes the ponded areas quickly. Dougan's drainfield is in a relatively low area west of the house, and is adversely affected by the runoff ponding near it. The proposal is to create a pond for storage near the culvert, then use the spoils to fill near the drainfield and create a swale to channelize the water past the drainfield. Zoning File #1082 October 17, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Discussion: City Engineer, Glenn Cook has reviewed the grading plan on the site, and although he generally has no problem with the proposal, he has some reservations* Although he feels the project will not be detrimental to the watershed, he feels it will not accomplish the applicant's purpose of eliminating the backyard ponding at times when the storage pond is already full of water. The fill to be placed next to the drainfield may help the drainfield surface inundation situation, although Glenn warns that the pond holding water most of the time might have some effect on the drainfield because it is not a f^^®6^water surface with a need* And, there still may be occasional ponding directly south of the house, and this will not solve Mariers similar^ problem of having unchanneled flow overload through his backyard near his drainfield* Glenn feels, and I concur, that a more comprehensive swale and fill project would be beneficial to both homeowners as a more permanent solution* The applicant is aware of these concerns and realizes the proposal is not a cure-all* Staff Recommendation: Prom an overall watershed viewpoint, the project is inconseguentia 1 and may even be of minor benefit by providing some additional short-term storage area* Given that this is not a designated wetland, and that it has been reviewed by the Watershed District, staff has no problem recommending approval of the project* However, applicant is advised that the project might not be the final solution to the occasional pond in the backyard, and depending on the level of the water in the pond at a given time, might have some impact on the water table level near the drainfield* L. he he be he en xt on of a al rs is re th of L S tne a ed ;t. al he ct n Q> 9 *%j^ tj ^ GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION k r ■■ '• •' -• Aev.( /c.'-ooc PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^7^? (P^hL C.\Yol^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 2.3 L 'VlAC/T Please check one - Is the property _ _ _ _ abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) - - - - - Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name F*, ^ 7^i-2^8>^r _ _ _Phone 4^7 3 ^ (^3 _ _ _ _ _ Mailing Address 7 0S l^hj IC (PCi Id. Cl / OWNER Name \JOHtJ f > h0(/ Cr^K)Phone ^73-^3 5*5^ Mailing Address 5 7^5" Ia /^) ^ClIC C\ rxJ'^ ST3LTC Date Property Acquired "V_ _ _7^_ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS $100.00 a)Residential accessory Use $150.00 b)Institutional (church, school $150.00 c)Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d)Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f)Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) __ _ _ _ $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation ______ $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision 7^A>‘ ed on ore OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT, _ _ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning _ _ _ _ $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS >/l» Completed Application Form. ✓^2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Construction plan, if applicable. Plat Map. The applicant and Property Owner must cign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date 03 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of^this request. Owner's signature £,n O-c j O Date CtI 03 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 HavePlanning Commission Meetina Plnrm-5n« __ _• • octrees ,25 days before the third M^day of each Commission Meetings are held on the ostn in ^ CM M Q. s lU Uio <a £ ro 5 D 10 10 S >- < ^ CO O -I cn >• Kl CM I S| o o h*in >• 3o tx oc CD CD gg in CO I o in to in CO o to o H h* d: q : lij yj CD CDo o DC OC 2 ^ o in S3 N tx ^ Mo u CM ^o t«l UI CM h- I M O^ 35 Z ^ 3 M § M UJ mJ mJ o ^ u to Df to S M^ u in < ^ o < -> O 2 I ^ 0 0*0 CO •« CO CM to o ft UJ < h- Ui M x:|i2 X o o U CO 2 M f-w o ft CM «J r:$ = ^ •> I ^ ft o in UJ N. in CO CM UJ to o ^ s°gUJ I— M ^ |i3 -,Kg J3S S UI 5 ao ftUi t6 fto UJ ftft X a ft s?o 2 ft gO 2 UJ < < >- \ O 3<C UJ a X _ ft < UJ CL UJ CL X CL2 ^o 2 X <Oe5 3 2 UI ftX o< ft o 2 UJ < >- \ ft < Ui UJ a X <r X U < 2 O I- N CM CM to CM I N ftUJu 2 Ui LLlO ^ 2 CD < C>into inin 2 f I vfo CO to UJ CD < N M O O r> -j < Ui CL o “grzo ►- ft UJ h- <2 UJ in -I in a zM 3a o ft •J oft >-0 ft UJ < to CD < 0 M M •J 0 CMI*CD in o U u in O -J ftUitooft to O < UJ inz < in N ^>- M UIt- u in >- u CM in 2 << >-1 CD >-to CD <in ft UJ CO q: ZO< 0 O -J CD 0 ^ M •mj O M M UJo -J CO in o -J UJ in o u u in o o »- ino <to o < -J X to o ft to O 2ft h-•J UI K UI u < in M in X 5 UI 0* in < in M in X in h- in CM - h- to >• u H in sr o ft 4* O UJftin ft in 2 >*UI ft o a»n D ft >•to U H UJ ft to UJ M UJ < _to UJ fto 3 UJr 3 “2 UI aoaa ft < Ui a ^ X :i < o H fto 3 ^5 in CM O o CM 10 CM I N I o m'A li o o u H < CO < Ho H t-in *0 ft UI UJ ft -J CO LU CD 2 UJ Xu < ocn to to •J < CM O in in X o K u Uir2 M X -I O UI -> ESo a ft < V X H ^ U M 2 MUX ft o in o o -J \ <r OL u to X ftoo < ao fta ftUJ Vt ft Ui >- <a X < ft O 3 UJ X — C/ r» — ^^ c: — o r: rr o c- >o-gS o> r: S c: =: -n X • • o z:t/i o > C c*5 1 t- CITY <rf ORONO *. . ••Post Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323*Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka • ' 4 « A. May 29, 1984 n Q V Mr. John Dugan 2785 White Oak Circle Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Re; Drainage Problem Dear Mr. Dugan: I reviewed your drainage situation with Glenn Cook, City Engineer, and John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator. Mr. Gerhardson informed me that the grading work done at 425 South Old Crystal Bay Road had been maintenance of the existing drainageway and did not require a permit. Our 1971 file air photos indicate the area was not a retention basin then, which bears out the fact that this is an historic drainageway. Mr Cook indicated that in his opinion, the grading in itself, would likely not have the effect of signifi cantly increasing the volume or velocity of flow through the culvert onto your property. A topographic investigation of the watershed draining through your property indicates it is roughly 17 acres in area. The relatively steep slopes and clayey soils throughout this area would tend to create a naturally speedy runoff. Both Glenn and John were of the opinion, and I concur, that the ponding effect you are getting is most likely a result of the "trapped" basin behind your house. The water level has to raise to a certain level before it overflows across into Marier's property and to the southeast. There may be an old agricultural drain tile in this low spot that has plugged up or broken, which could also be slowing the drainage. We know there was a 12" diameter (approximately) draintile found during construction of the home at the end of White Oak Circle. A tile system may indeed extend into your property. Air photos show this property has been under cultivation previously. I am afraid I do not have a quick and easy solution for your ponding problem. You might consider creating a swale across the hump between your property and Marier's so that water does not stand in your back yard. I do not know what effect this might have on Marier's property BUILDINC & ZONINi; - 473 7357 ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION A HNANCT. - 473 7358 Pl’BLIC WORKS - 473-73S9 } t } John Dugan May 29, 1984 Page 2 L'i»rrs‘S:-^ Please feel free to call me if you have further questions. Sincerely, Assistant Zoning Administr Attachments cc:Mr L. James Marier, 2775 White Oak Circle Long Lake, MN 55356 \JO »-iTmi iiM-nim-f imam n ■niiiiiBii i^iii i rn iin i~f inrii ■!■■■ Ttut ni T "iiriTtraiui ~ nr unm t nrnr~ ■i~i'immtir iTrn r ■■ii'iiniiriiirr g^rnma^Ti nmmutn 'or#km.' .•«»i / 1-. i *^*. * * '*> i . . . u» V .'; n r; i-j r ^ *1 ?r% n n m rr. r -i ; ;r L ’ljayciijbUuj;:-aL Jt'-'i i ‘ '*w >1 ; •• *r » P * 1 n ■ * J ! ,« • r. . ?' .-■% 1 t. '•i L .1 ii,-j ii '«i A. V M V. V ^(: :>• z" ‘\ , /-i [•, ' ^ r. I M * i !] Ur.-. M \ 1 r|vJ/ cJ ««* a Li Ljuy ii Ij J Liza licrV ! tx^ J ^v'J J L »J 1] LAKE MINNCTOK a A ; iu P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANA6ERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. • Aioert L. Lehman • John E. Thomas Michael R. Carroll •Camille D. Andre •James B. McWbthy •JamesR. Spensley Hr.TS J«Xi^~ / 3Sic2;:rsrii:ri .Ti Permit Application No: 86-137 Date: August 26, 1986 Owner:John Oougan 2785 White Oak Circle Orono, MN 55356 #1082 Location:City of Orono, Sec 4BD, east of Crystal Bay Road and north of Fox Street Purpose:Wetland alteration to control water and prevent overloading of drainfeld and flooding Dear Mr. Dougan: At the regularly scheduled August 21, 1986 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed. Action was taken allowing District staff to issue your permit only after receipt and staff approval of the following: 1. 2. Information regarding the size of the in-coming culvert and a plan showing the outlet pipe to be the same size of the inlet pipe. Documentation that the applicant has received a conditional use permit from the City of Orono. Please be advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been submitted and you have been notified of permit issuance. Should you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at 473-4224. Very truly yours. EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District cc: Julie Johnson Board G. Macomber Chris Hughes, Coffin and Gronberg J. Mabusth, City of Orono J . . .< • • . .• ■ . • *• •••‘.*' %_• T '■ • ' m . • • . •• • ••;••• • .:-.,Sv'^-- . . . • > • • • *.*♦"*. ^ #• C *-1.. •; • *rv*• • • •*: . . X LU O IaJtu Ul Uiu. OO I X ' Im M H 0^ -Tfur.I?*" ,2 • V'■f f, ''~'^z--\ ii ' m »; */ •;; 9 i ^r? *mmim w 9 *-^.* , £ ■41 M'■?».■■ ‘'\fr Vf' *.•#'* ^ • •»'* M • 4 00 * ■ •' if ^ rv •*' ■•' - *■ • * ^ ^ ' * A- 't « .-«■ •*••• 2 644.44 Rfes.... -f•' '<:•. ■ i * • It; # i .■•* - f .< ••» ■ : ■■“••V 'f : • •< .;■ V' ;•'■'.'v-' :i.'- "?,vV.';':"•. L />;■;•■.'.:• • J li^V • ^ •jT* EAST 759.69 r-• ^ .Tj /fj .'•r' 4 :• 'I .mMv ..>'^'V» i; ■ ■' )''■M .‘::r..• I % V ,• • I • B •. , • • ••*. •• • .%k\l • ■ ..(t •• .*• •».•■ •• • . * % •• « *•»•%*«■•.• •*• • «• (. •••*»•%• «* • « ••• • »i •■•.•»*i-« • • •■•«»» «•• I • •• • • .. *.« • • •••%•.«• •■• •........... •• !.« • « ^ 396.89 EAST ^4 330 /•. . :2 * J* *' • • V*-* * . I •.••#, - • •«#, , i ♦ • • - - ; .; 'M 'V>; *H-r t,M V X I-a:o , ^ ^ V ^' .1 • r>i T ,.•■ -• ft *'£••4 - o ix> X H- (t O Z i :>■ J OO fs» ' . «» •• » i CO Vi)r-:'-^S r* I # "»r1SV' • t . ■ Vi «‘ V# O« i' V '» «o ^1 • ^ . * 4 ♦- -* a • ^ ^ . r r- ^ / V • f i a: o ^ '■ y ■ V • . ' ', N8fl*54'E ’ 320 « ^ r! V on oo v5 TD: From: Date: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 13, 1986 Subject: #1084 Robert Maxfield, 4175 North Shore Drive Variance - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Pertinent Facts: Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Sewer As-Built Map Hardcover Calculations For Each Building Site Tax Book Information, 1/17/86 and 1974, and Sewer Assessment Breakdown 1. Entire property includes 5 parcels, all separate for tax purposes - all 5 parcels apparently purchased by Maxfield at same time - zoning has always been 1 acre, since prior to Maxfield's purchase. 2. House sits on Lots 51 and 52, with ample setbacks, 33' from proposed east line and 35' from existing west line. Existing hardcover for Lots 51, 52, and 53 is well within the prescribed limits. Vacant lot (49 & 50) has an allowable hardcover of 6,675 s.f., cunple for the intended residential use. 3. Lot Area and Width: Area Width Total of Parcels 45,000 s.f. (1.03 ac. )225' Standards For LR-IB 43,560 s.f. (1.00 ac.)140' Proposed:1) Site With House 25,000 s.f. (0.57 ac.)125' (Lots 51, 52, 53) 2) Vacant Site 20,000 (0.46 ac.)100' (Lots 49 & 50) 4. Sewer is available and has been fully assessed to the proposed vacant building site: Lots 49 and 50 were each assessed % sewer unit and footage but not the $225 trunk charge (to be charged with building permit). Lots 51, 52, 53 with house were charged 1 sewer unit plus footage and trunk charge. Zoning File #1084 October 13, 1986 Page 2 of 3 5. a)In the LR-IB Zoning District, as of 1984: 657 existing developed single family residential units 634 of 657 (or 96%) meet or exceed 0.20 acre 508 of 657 (or 79%) meet or exceed 0.40 acre 465 of 657 (or 71%) meet or exceed 0.46 acre 363 of 657 (or 56%) meet or exceed 0.60 acre Recent lot area/width variances granted to common ownership lots in the LR-lB District: Application #813 Smith, 525 Parle Ln .71 ac #830 Smiley, 2720 Pheasant Rd .65 ac #1051 Glesne, 1475 Cherry Pi .68 ac Hmstd Lot Vacant Lot .38 ac .59 ac .64 ac Maxfield Request. . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .57 ac • 46 ac Substandard single separate ownership lots granted build- ability in recent history in LR-lB District: Application #607 Bredeson, 1410 Rest Pt Rd #632 Hommeyer, 477 Park Ln . #658 Coddon, 4015 Dahl Rd #780 Bloms, 4195 Forest Lk Dr #802 Munsell, 4100 No Shore Dr #833 Brockopp, 933 Wildhurst Tr #858 Howells, 1448 Park Dr #873 Clifford, 4760 No Shore Dr • 53 ac .52 ac .44 ac .39 ac .23 ac • 40 ac .60 ac . 39 ac 1981 1981 1981 1983 1983 1984 1984 1984 (expired) d) Single separate ownership lots denied buildability in LR-lB District in recent history: Application #820 Fisk, 493 Park Ln #912 Hedlund, 3990 No Shore Dr .25 ac .22 ac 1984 1985 e)Common ownership lots denied buildability in LR-lB in recent history: No contemporary applications found in LR-lB. Discussion: Regarding Access - given that the proposed building site is on County Road 19, a Hennepin County Driveway Access Permit must be issued. Both the County and the City generally prefer a shared driveway to minimize accesses directly onto the County Road. However, the existing bushes make the existing driveway very hazardous for getting out onto the road. Applicant should be advised to contact Hennepin County Department of Transportation as soon as possible regarding the access permit. Zoning File #1084 October 13, 1986 Page 3 of 3 Regarding Variances - Given the facts as listed in 1 thru 5 above, this application appears to be consistent with other applications that have been approved in recent years. A second sewer unit was assessed even though the zoning at the time sewer went in was 1 acre. The vacant lot at 0.46 acres is larger than 29% of the existing developed LR-IB properties. Staff Recommendationss Staff would recommend approval of lot width and area variance subject to: j..County driveway access permit to be obtained and submitted prior to Council review of the application. 2. Payment of $225 sewer trunk charge and $430 park fee at the time a building permit is issued. 3. Maximum permitted hardcover of 6,675 s.f. 4. Combination of Lots 49 e.i d 50, and combination of Lots 51, 52 and 53, prior to issuance of ouilding permit. lU.j i •; i tm V i t ■* J • # . • /• • CITY OF ORONO - VARIAKCE APPLICATION c? l/oa^ ' ^‘^00 SiC^ Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address A Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) o y ^ f/7 ^ 2:^ YY ooy ^ Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name LUrf Phone y 7 Z y / Z U Mailing Address O /)K, At(J OWNER Name /f<y HU /f^/^/4lfone } ^7____ Mailing Address ^^If C4^/j Date Property Acquired /D ^ ^ ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not-) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY * Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; j'€> VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other r » '* >1—nT4i~r-»r^ HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from stric^ enforcement of zoning reflations; LM,^ s',T€ ^ h^e.w'eire. a- <t*fa \ lAiflf.ilf'H t nyfla /ltd aJ~ MntJif'iirrl* tU 'LM nr ! iff n mo ^ / fe ^ €! DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; Tf u^»i/U. ^ir‘o h^rTij ar/i^ 4j^“2, i!) t! i - REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). I . 3.Stamped^ legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. 5. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign thls application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied /s/true ^d ^zf^r^fect to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ____, '{t/L/f_______ Date ^ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of /this refest Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submitta^ into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planing Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. c O inm rH Ma w i HIai DC UJos »HI so oo 5 q: 5 CD oo K>to ro CM I aCOo toCO < 2 5 CL (0 to O H X to inm I COro olUKM LUM >aM <UL CVJ CO to CM CLX c in CMoo to CM NO CO to oo ro toCM IN I oo to rO CM Itv Irvo COto to < sS^ a.•J CO< oX X O 3Ui CO M p > M a -I M P <•O LU H ^ CO in in ro VL CM X to CMto inin lu X -jo o < lU X H I- >- to< K O >- H M d: CO u a u CO < OLs zCOCO < 3 5 a CO CO O H X CO in in in oLU HM XLUM >QCM •<iu to CM 3 Q. oroo < aoaa LU d: X o < o: a X M < a < UJ IU a XsgiO H € CMo a o a DCUI OL X ^ o sr o o to 3 CM X I CD fv M Ifv O ^ fv S o UI 3 Z >< M O < 3 > O •fi UIo z z <O CO CO < 3 CD LU -J CL lU CD X to to in in inootv OHlU 2MX Oo ooc UI XM CO to CM Ifv Ooo 3XtoM X z3 Ifv O CM CO M•J O CO LU a <o <f H r^» o o in q: o in < o 5x, ^ O CM Z <0 O •H tx <t O oa CMo a o a S o osssX CJ uI to u a toCM a aIrv o o CO to IU LUX X CO ^ < to O -> -) ooc o to a in o in o 3 § Z M X si»-i O sf X <0CMo Q O DC ^ n ^ o o to 3 CM X I tofv M X Irvo o in COto o to 3 •3 IU to 3 Z lU Mto Z Z M M UI Z HH CO LU ^ < < Xo -0 “0 o 3 o8 3 X <rM)ro in in to zM X X eo ^ in 5 -4 o X z ro CM Irv Irvo §X z to < M < X > lU O UJ tt 3 CJ O _ •M *9 O X < «9 to PH to 3LU in CD o 3LU fv O HUI MX IU 3 X 3 _ _ _ Qo 3 a Q Z Ui < < >• N3 lU a Ui a ; • n: S ^ Z u. b H i c> too *0- to CMIrv Irvo COto ^ X fv < >ro oCMLUro O Q O to o o O 3 in O 3 <r Q <f o <in 5 oo ro CM Irv o 3XoM X Irvo o<r COto o "’i •« 3 LU Z LU< ? 3 toLULU -> S>. < 3 3 O <f 3 Oto o in oin 3 gg X o ^ p •-I o Sf X UI 3 X O 5 O Z <3 3 LU O Z 3 3 OL O 3 Q 3 O LU < >- N< UI a X N < < Z H CM Oo sf ro CM Irv Irvo <roo ro CM Irv Itv O ^ X 3 Os 3 O 33 3 UI rco 3 Q 3 O UI < >- \< IU 3 X X << z 'I t h- ^ 1 r Certificate. Cf ^imfei/ Survey Tor^SO B Pni^Vf^lfrjn Boo X 27?^ , Page ^7 File Scni£ O - i:fZdN S£7“ O = X^o // X^PL L LOTS 47 iro » h/IGt/iVOOO I/^JCS N\n^N B-TOf^Hns yej^hJtp!/^ cou/jry\ f)M/V BSOTP . SCHOBORG U>iND SURVEYING INC. • • 4 072.33SI Rr. 2. 00.133 . D(bM«o.MN 83320 ||:l€Ps™ OP THB STATE OP MINNESOTA; L Li ■ • • RO AD \9 . . HO.HO.' 50 49 SERV 5A 0492 I3 ‘ LOrJG 0415 13'LONG 7' DR 24p5 l3 ‘ ILONG 7'A r i4 ‘ L 7'0 1100'92.6 A//V C»P <5> FORCEW^ • • •I •..24' tirs // Sign BASSi 14'*,9-| ip.6‘ 34': •’ 9' 12" jp ELM 24" BASSWOCO C? 24- maple / / 36" ' ^ / ELM ^^18" MAPLEj ^ / 31 32 2t35 ' 13 LONG 7 OP BASbWOOD U55 13 ’ LONG 2410 13 ’LONG 7’OP. 2445 13 LONG M., ME AT C / / 7' OP COR. ofN planter AR. ENT. A 046.69 0490 13 ’ LONG 7'DR HO 2447 13" LONG HO HO HO HC BE TWEE COUNTY ROAD HIGHWOOI. • -1 - - - - I *v_j^vy o *V'w w- V » -W Certificate. ^i^ev Survey Tot BD R PD 'i Cl/r/ D Boolc_2!^ Pogo 6 ‘7 File I+It' S7(^ Xij/?<:£■ i“~4d' O - TEON S£7~ O- lEo// X//PL Ike SCHOBORG LOTS 49 AMD Sro ^ mGt/UJOOO LBIk.. Nsih/NB~rof/HFi \ keti/hJePiN couuTyi m/A/A/BSoT-P. LiND SURVEYING INC. 072«922l ftr. 2. ootisa . Otb*M«.MN Bsnio I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVPV OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY OP^T»R^??2'TP^n2° SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS 0F THB STATE OF MINNESOTA; > • • ••• MmMi DATE 14700 fvj ‘C' u K “•V 'i':> k n Us N; Iv, lU 0 5 U O T3 f—I M iH 0 < JZ > 4J o c 0 uu 0o. iu Tl 0 W O 0 >ou o 0 o tJ^ rH Oj O4 "U 0 U u fd 01 x: 4J c 0) u V-l 0) < •!• Q CU-- CO TJ Q) iii Q) > 0Oiwoe0000 IS Oi'O N 0 U s 05 C 0 CU x; -H M E-1 • <Q D J U 0 05 0 <5-1 D'-'H u t7> 05 rd C > 4J X «•HOCw4J 0 05 ^ >W TD U < 0 •H M 5-j u X (d 0 CQQW S: Du'^Di <• a:u 0z u 0 tr- 0 ci c > 0 0 •HOC •IJ U W ^ o N •H X u fd W X c *H ty^ roc •H 4J U) •H 4J (1)u rO Q) C O N Xro I c w «o :i: COro c o NP iW (/) (T^ U-i (/) 4-f if) m (N C N o m 44 if) 44 to n50^ lo \,J \ 44 to tM CO \2/ r. m n c\ Uj tt-lw 5 \? \r\ M ^ Vi 44 to 44 (0 (VS u 0 0 0 io n s:<UO 0 0 0 Xm w r-in m r4 u 1 (N 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 Mtoinin0•H (N in Q 'Oc 05 rH o r-< .Q fd TJ r-l •H P X >1 TJ 44 O (1) Cn fd 4J oo 44 ou p cr to r-4 fd 0 •0 ^ 0 0 to 0 •-I rX rH rH >n3 0 • >1»H 0 5 a X 0 CO m 0) •H to C O N (U T3 P E; nd a 4J tn •—I U *H o O TJ D. C •> U 0w U-l o o x: 44 c >1 o r-< -H a. 4J •H -H Ol* (d •H rd 4J rH pe <Dco N m I ro r—I fd >o£ 0 M 0 to fd 0 oc •H 44 0 C d3 0 to O <lo J4 c o 0 0 XI <|4J 0 4J 0 O U P H C •H c c x: •H 4^i 0 •H rH 0 44 (0 •H X 0 -H 5 to P rH a 44 o 0 Cn 0 44 Oo 44 Pc Q Q) 0u x: C 44 44 i4 >1 O P X u o n3 pq| V4 0 C X •H u 0 Xe p c >1c 0 uo 44 X C 0 e 44 V4 0 a. 0 0 Q 44 Cn-H c 44 c 0 J4u pocou oc c -H CJ'c •H 4J rH p to 0 u 0 > 0 X 44 •H co ISJ >1TJ c e 0 >1 p x; X r4 44 .0 Q o 0 V4 0 p Q Po •H > c •H C •H 0 0 X Di G e p tp c •H X 0 •H u 0 X u 0 Xcou 0u 0c 0 0 to oaoucu >1 X 0 to to 0u 0c ■i to 0 0 d3 pc Xc rH P 0uc 0 •H V4 0 > u 0 >oo H 0 X 0 X X oc >1 0e 44 CP-H C X 00 rH 00W 1 0 00X000 X c 0 X 54 w C C 0 -H x: 0 4-» 0 IT> 0 0 0 X 0 4J X a P C -H -H X 4J 5< ^0 0 •H .p 54 X 0 TD 0 >1 C -H 0 W Vl T3 W •H X -H 'O >to 0 05 -H 0 > 4J » 0 03 0 'O X > fO •H pL| 4-1 0 0 TJ P ^ •H p TD 4.4 X p r-t 0 T3 rH •H C 0 0 *• rH 0 u 1 e X 0 0 C '0 1 c 1 p U-l 4J C C •H C •H W rH 0 0 •H d 0 0 W 0 W N 1 O' 1 tr> 0 0 W 0 1 — 0 0 cn 0 X 'O •0 *0 4-> 0 4J 0 C -H 0 0 0 0 C 0 c c c 4J -H 4J X *H c c 0 > 0 0 0 C *H 0 »W 0 0 N 0 U N 0 0 W rH E -H M N ft M 54 0 0 -H 0 C 0 c 0 54 cnx M 0 C 'O •H 54 CU *H • P 0 0 -H 0 Ol •H 0 0 PL| 4J W > (0 •H 54 54 54 54 C W 0 0 r-4 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 *H > 0 > >>00 CU'O H U 0 > 0 0 0 > 54 54 C < 0 U 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 -H 0,'O 54 '0 T3 'O 0 rux X 4J to 5i O’ 5-1 5 4 54 *0 4J 54 0 fU 0 0 -t 51 *0 O' 0) 0 X XX • X 0 0 w C > x:0)54 X ? W -H 0 Cn 4J tr» >1 tPdd 0 'O 0 P 4J 0 C c <d c 0)> 0 *0 «H 0 W T5 •H c •H 5 *H (0 0 W 0 rH W *H 54 4J -H X 0 X 0 0 0 S 0 •H X 0 w x:W > to Oi^ O. 0 'O Q) X •H 4->•f-4 -H 0 54 0 rH 0 X -H X 54 X 54 0 54 rH X 0 4-4 154 ri3*owxxcu<4->4J 0 0 •• • •• • <ra UP W Cm & 'Vi cc O 2 O M Eh < D O -Uo c3u O 'O .H U rH rJ < s: ou o (U o CPrH fd cu'd o u u d pl4 x: 4J c Q)uu 0) < Da'-- 3 0 J 4 _t J)o o o 04^00 u ^ d (D C O N C 'H M tP (U C > •H O 4J O (/) TJ •H V-l X dw x: o (D O Cr*»H d 4J C (D O (U CQa."-" •I* CP d 0 M d c •H 4J tn •H 4J 0 do N Xw •! c w Pi ou: COwx; < CJ <m Eh W CO PI :2ic t>3 C O in CN o CO nS 0^•c^ u-t w 4-1 (/} 4-^ in \0 0^ v50^ in m 4-4 in \P0^ O 44 in 44 in 4-4 in a Pu 44 in in I o o in CN I in r* oo in I o in (N o o 0 rH 1 oo in C VJ <4 << 4 a" < 1 j> 04 4 V’ i) M 44 44 44 44 tr- 0 in in in inc >0 •H o c 4J U o W T3 •«H M N •oX 0 c W 42 •fH • m 1 11 inco •H 4J O 0u •H Q C d •—4 0 rH Xi d H3 rH •H d ja >1 44 o 0 CP d 4J oo 44 O in rH d 0 •H IQ O O f-4 O O rH 0 in 44 • >1 rH 0 jci d c c O >1 o N rH 'H a4J •a -H *H ^ 0 4-) 'O in -H rH n:5 ^ 44 :3 rou ---I eo ^ O 03 0 a d in ^ u d o o <lo o jc m o 4J c a C rH tP-H M rH c 42 0) nj •H AJ ^ 4J -H e W w ? 53 P •H c rH Q a, (U 0 U 42 W CJ 4J O >1 o 0 D 43 O tj> OD TU >iT3 43 Qj C0 >10TJ X CL Q) •H 4J rH d G 0 do N in rn I m rH d >o G 0 0 in d 0u 0 d •H 4J 0 d '2 rX 0 tn 43 <|4J 0 4J *0 c •H 4J d 0 J4 3 0 do 0 oc X 0 V4 0 X G d d 0 > 0 X 4J 4J d 0 G 4J in V4 d >1 a., c 0 d d Q 44 CP-H d •H d o c rH d in 0 W >i03 d 4J C0| V4 d d 6 0 >n d JQ rH 4J ,o Q| 0 d d 4J 0 d rH rH d V4 0 d 0 CJ 0 inoaoua >1 J4 d in in 0 0 0 d V4 0 0 JQ J4 O 3 C 42 •H ‘rH 4J 0 >4-> d O 0 -H c 0 0 O d Uh -H t7»V4 in c C 0 Ccr> H C (U o 0 0 'O in 0 M 0 -H XI tp •H p >1 5-1 0 4i -P e 0 *0 Cl 0 d rH 0 a E w d 4J iH 0 42 G d 3 e P -r<d d 3 > 4J cr-H c X a O .-1 aoW 1 0 0 0 42 0 0 o 4J C 0 42 U in C d 0 -H x: 0 4-> 0 Cn o d 0 42 0 4J 42 CL 3 C -H •H X 4J P 4J (D o •H 4-»V4 4J 0 03 (13 >1 C -H d W P T3 W •H X •rJ fp > in O 0 -H C)> 4J •fc 0 TD 0 »0 42 > 'D •H a a 0 d 03 3 4J -H p 03 44 43 d rH 0 ^ rH •r4 c O 0 •» iH U 0 1 e 42 03 0 c n? 1 c I 3 MH +J d d •H C *rH in rH 0 o •r4 0 0 C3 in 0 in N 1 t;' 1 CP 03 0 in 03 I ^ 0 d CP 03 x:03 •0 TJ 4-> 0 4J d c •H o 0) 0 0 C 0 C C2 d 4J •«H 4J 4J •H c c O > 0 0 03 d •rH ri5 44 O O CO 0 U N U C3 W »H E •H Nl N CL P V4 u 0 •H O C 0 C G) 34 Cr>43 U a d 03 •«H J-4 *H •CL 03 d •rH 0 CL •H 0 O (L 4J W >CO •H U C4 >H V4 d W 0 c d 44 0 rH 0 0 CD J4 (U 0 0 d 0 'fH > 0 > >> 0)u a'0 ^4 0 O > 0 O O >u M d C 0 U 0 u u U O 03 0 0 •H any u'O ^3 03 O a42 42 4J w Jh O' >H Cl U 03 4J V4o0 0 0 d U 03 CP 03 »4l 0 52 52 52 •d: d (U in d > 42 m V4 n:5 in *H O tJ> 4J tj' >1 tn'O 0 'O O d 4J u C C 0 C 0 >0 *0 rH o in 03 •H C •H 3 -H w o W 0 rH in -H M 4J *H -M 0 4J 0 u 0 d •H X d W 42 w > w a^j a o 03 0)x: •H 4J •H *H *H O M o —^03 X X X M d M rH x:O 44 44 W 5 W 03 W C4 a <c 4J 4-> O O •• • •• • fq U Q w a --------- •• • •• .iM • ia*jHr,UUt' LAK^ MTK/i _.h£LGA SP 990CSlcJCctd ..........~7 MAXMcL) fCcu^vT 1 '' —7;> UJKTH Smj'. i. MCXJNU o ^JCi^ r *.A 27 7-3 l^oV i»0 S*»9 33U2 ____I‘JT£fii. S«^^£:n 63 Ib 53a^: :>i:„ i-,p 145. j9 HELGA 990C5l03Ci«5 / £L'J -Jcl'- f I '' 277-3 MA a FKL'J 4175 f^jATh 3HC*«” „ MN 5J>3o4 6 Ten ' faa “ ............... * ~ 3302 IMcnC StN Sc.»lk oi lb 409 ^.-5332 ____SPn IMP 1970L3-1 43.51 5o.4v ■>• • H5LGA SP-kPM,-'i «i7 7-3 4175 *»3'^Trt wMv.* “ MauNO •j 7 £ ;... 3302 53S2 ' • 553o4 o: \ I -«A nCi^? 3 I c *4t-’ trsi cXC.'a-? Tax ik 3C%'^3 ..’J I iTESEiT IfiT'.. rC 'jC'-i 5ri.E< t*3 Irt 5'rt i'-.P 197JLi-i 206.29 6f 7<it* •>* P- • ^ r' • i ^ C6C*3ci / L ; - . r T >/ HE LG A bPAf^rM.Vi 49CCDiC6C*3C MAXF I 41 ?:> •* .' « Im .- t ^6o\6 >;•, ifLV If.il o j’f. TAX J30<;: I'.T-.rtC j':i-i2^ oj lt> 230 ► 71 -i J. r. I -’.r i * ^ '{ •-2 t;.:#!; . NELL K r j. u 3655 rt a T Z E 1034 1 7 r M £ 4 f i ;, k P4 •;(' I < ■« '..1 J't > t 1 o j • '>, i c7 7^5 *• i. y ic«- J.J ^ Jf 1974 P)4 30-0f;UNU 2U5.36»<» • .« 4 • • •• if 3o0 59.47 2.34 14^.55 2U5.36<"« 930 43.51 2.34 54.65 100.50ft* 21*4^0 700.30 315.14 19. t9 2 .34 263.05 671 .34*ft 650 2 9.79 1.20 27. J5 5m, .ih *♦ i 1 -] I •i ,(?-0 ^1(C ti,eoo »7<. .1*0 >%AW ww ^ -AA —A A ► , \. I . . • 'ft > » . I I «.1 £T-; * ,v ‘*- . r^A> •fe'.’ ii' .: .J • -♦ .'»:W<»» A * > » .. . 41 . • - - ■ !■*;;(,:■ ■w : »..' ; io‘-r^-4{ ; :. r.* 1 • i I' * • j A1 i 1 , ■ » 4 • ■ ' t .S"• ^ . • «Jr..- r- \.i :\: •/'. j Vv ■ • »!■ • • 4 ' '' i! i»- t| ■. - ■♦ • 4 -fi, i * tai ■<- ? ». *»- : J: V i . I I i’ 1^ » ti 1 K •’ • - :•• • r.?f '\.'A'^rf;‘'~' it .t^>Vii I K.» w w . i: \ )!-; -4f * A « 41 .. » « ♦ \ If V) '■j. f>: ( •» T a o I n; n “T •4 —i • I * TT I ‘ >• ^ -4 j: I- \* <' I*** IT A 1. •"! J ■••. *-4 •. c i f C I* V L ^ • • • XT V. -T xr ^ ^ u 4* ► » 1 “ \ ur 1% u c c Kf {k O ^ C’ :< K- l> V c: .X > O' O' r* c \ I »• f i» <• /,C3 C • • r • •% u # • • / 4 J 4 •• • ; i' 4 ► • * V* . tj r. -I 4 t' 4 r r s « *• c u »«• } > f t c c l- f- I K VT X c V 4 c 4" U ^ O 4 U « • • C v; ^ ff to f »• ( i \ c» I/* 4 • 1 r •4 I V c 4^ 5 3c •- C r c. c. 4^ ,r sT.u r.* 7 > * • ^ r r- ^ Ck. •i \J z< C •— I k. V*- U -• 7 -H f .o i» c i l/» I? f C; I ^ fi n » •* . r. i- ► L -4 i *1)1^ . # • • I •** r- •• i0 ‘ k -*•' ••• *1 c « I • • r- H f# » 1 — t -» > I •• I IA ^ —4 4 4 4^ O • c* V Iu* ; »• N •sj 4 >• w V 4 ^ ^ •/> U* ^ Ct: • • • f • - xr a u» 4 v»* r 4 « 4^’ i c i t r i c. II V i 4 U • » rt • ♦ r u ♦ w ^ •.« 5r|-4 <* X *•' r* > 1 • % • '■- .*•« t .1 . •! \f 30 C ' f»JV ?> < * • «« •X •• ' .* •1 rf^»1 i •« X <‘ Xi /• •-• 1 ’ jJC X • • ' c> .• '.'•; *» T».5 • < • c t » <»•<• 9 ^;• •#1 •- • ■ J *'l ♦:•• r 1 •y r% i ; tT i'-1 *t : A-j 1 ••.. -J i «'»/.i • •;i. ^1 f ••: •i •1*T)k ► •»iIt.,. 1 O J r 1 1 ^ »I «’jfV C .»1 •1 »1 1-4 ’9 I 1 •HC S> » X ; :: ^ ' ^ \» X' H •? m i./> x* >• ;r >* j .k m » T» • r » »» fT» *^y • ^ ;ri X X* m M v’r- -4ri •<-< Kfrry *•> 30 J -X Jt_!_ x*n "n f 1 > > v: V ’< .vf;l I' r ^ c. iv’i^ I>• > Ml jiCXc* »• ^ V'' >r* \ m ry X olo ~3 ►"•!»-« tA t. -; O . I-«o •wn I » C X -n r*'3*>r‘ C3 r*"* t» o 3 . «t t* X c* ■» ii-t n*i -40U?! rj ri» »• « r»»> f-.%.» •L>r» n T*c^n *=yo n» o CM \ : ,1 . ♦/' pio I ) * » : I •I 5<gWc£-?<2. ^ZS^.'ZJ/^&r\yTZ <5/^ 'T?^' to t hI^i f(AT~ L UAJ/^'S I 00^1 j V2-'lcro -77^0 ■!! i;i ‘I I» 00^\^- ■VSoo ‘i Oc>^^- y<^O C> HU / S'8-S' C>dVJ~ I! ■ :.. ;S :r — /oP ■f 39o -Poo-^^ i •«.v / 9 5 Mf . • 1 (ZDC? (^ua »vt^ VI /'3'S « ., I- !l ___ U* ; To:Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator 1 Date:October 15, 1986 Subject: #1085 Mr. & Mrs. Richard E. Brown, 1245 Sixth Avenue North Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA Application - Variance to construct lakeshore stairways normal straight-line stairway downhill) (exceeds List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Hardcover Calculations Photos Stairway Proposal Pertinent Facts: 1.Hardcover: - Existing 0-75* Hardcover: 0.5% - Proposed 0-75* Hardcover: 2.6% 2.Slope: - Length of Slope = - Height of Slope = - Slope Percentage ^ 60* approximately 33* approximately 33/60 X 100 = 55% 3.Hardships: - Unusually steep, long slope down to lake - Location of existing trees and clearing - "Bumpy" topography on slope (would require excavation to provide a straight-down stairway) - Straight-down stairway would provide little or no safety protection if someone was to fall (they would fall all the way to the bottom) I. Zoning File #1085 October 15, 1986 Page 2 of 2 4. Code/Policy Requirements: The Zoning Code currently treats stairs and decks as hardcover, and they are definitely structure, and as such their construction is a variance to the code requirements. Council has recognized that people have a right to have a safe access to their l®^®shore, and have allowed staff some discretion in approving stair— ways without a formal application, as long as such stairs are minimal, constructed straight down to the lake, have landings no more than 4' x 4*, and have spaced decking and non-hardcover surfaces underneath The Brown's proposal exceeds these guidelines, hence the need for a formal application. 5. Screening, Aesthetics - although the straight-down stairway is generally the least amount of structure, such a stairway may not be as aesthetically attractive when viewed from across the lake. In Brown's situation, the existing trees near the shore will help to screen the stairway. Discussion: Please review the photos attached and the stair design. If you view the site, you will be impressed by the magnitude of the slope down to the lake and will be able to visualize the problems a straight-down stairway would encounter. Staff Recommendation: Given the hardships as described above, staff would recommend approval of the proposed stairway per the proposed plan, subject to omitting the canopied structures shown on the drawing. #10 /5^e; /9'’?9o Si'<^ fie : IJ'S^oS.^/So ihc^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1245 6th Ave., North, Countv Road 6. Long LalcP. MN, 55356 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 261182334001 Please check one - Is the property abstract or X torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Mr. and Mrs. Richard £. Brown Phone 612 / 473-6544 Mailing Address 1245 6th Ave.. North. Countv Road 6. Long Lake. MN. 55356 OWNER Name Mr. and Mrs. Richard £. Brown Phone 612 / 473-6544 1 Mailing Address 1245 6th Ave.. North. County Road 6. Lono Lake. MN. 55356 Date Property Acquired _July 1986 (month/year) 1 I (do) ^do^^n^;) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District LR-1A Present Use of Property Residential Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 10,000.00 Describe request in detail; To construct a safe, aesthetically pleasing_____ stair system from existing residence front ( lake side ) yard tn existing hn;it rinrk VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Other Front Side Rear) r HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; (1) A matter of safety, negotiating a straight stair system within a steep 60 to 70 degree slope and (2) high banks cause water to pond within ten feet back from shore line. DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; Steep slopes coupled with irregular topography within Zone. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true)and. correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date 26 September 1986 The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council It^mbers for purposes of investiga tion and verif ica^tipn ,of this request. Owner's Signature ,(JJ./c - -DS^te 26 September 1986 Applicant must have all sUbmittalyB into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. d L ( in o ^ M M a w § Ul a lUtt r Ul H (0 ss CVJ L tt 111 Ifloo o UJ a in to tt KUJ UJ to CM I CO “5a (O CO «9 I CM CM lO into in in 3 CO O U Ul § CD S M Oo _ UJ ^ > to < h"UJ to CM ICO M •-• CO iiisH H UJ >- >- u in < < ^ ino O CO I CM Ch CJ <0to O < < ^ CO Z Z CM «J 0 0^0. o o ^ z I j xc; -1 5 o o o o COo o X5m •j u. M Ul K CO UJ tt UJ X V {38*^ = UJ u. Ul M tt O O •J <o o O UJ ID > >- >- < < < CJ to into in in Kt z u urlss z CO M ^ CO CO CO Ul < 55I ^ in o o ^ u o -j .j X H I in<r ID 3 10 Z o o CO ID tt tt r o O ^ tt o a z UJ < < >• N o O ^ tt o O Z UJ < < ^ \!< o g a. Sj S c a o H cr < Ul n ii 1 ft V* 5 tt < 0 liJ IX X* O Z X <g§3 = C € L c c L L (L 1.( 1 —If •• > *- • n ,v«‘ % I'i: h.: -e F’ OWNER Mr. and Mrs. Richard E. Brown 1245 6th Ave., North County Road 6, Long Lake, MN. 55356 #10/Oa r5ss<^ 8 o i l )fUf Laie LEGAL Part of Lot I, Muoitor's Subdivision No. 291 Torrens: Document(Deed) ho. 1740329 Certificate No. o83294 ; 'O 05 u ou O 'O rH »-l *H <0 < s: acn fO 4J c 0) u o Va*o Ou «J p4 x: o 0) O tTrH <0 «x. 0) u < }-4 •!• 0) Qa'-' t^»0 0 Ui 0 > 0 K tA 0 C 0 0 0 03:a^j N 0 u 2 M 0 C 0 04 x: *H H tH • <Q D r—1 U 0 0 0 <V4 tJ.tH U t7> 0 tfl C > 4J Xa:•HOCw4-» 0 0 —. >w no u < 0 ■H V4 t-l *1*u X m 0 cQ Q w x: a^^^ 0:■—1 <• a:CJ 0z 0 cr- 0 0:c > 0 0 •HOC ■M O •H ^4 X «0 w j:: o N c 'H ro C •H V-i 4J fO (0 •H .>J X o U r^ JJc o N c ■r-1 w pc;oXto Mui < u < fQ E htoto M 2;c CO c o CN to C\J CD I/) 3o CL B O 13 CO CL^ H4 II U) in o X in rv o - CO vVJ LH CM V O CO in CO •js 4^ (0 4-^ (/) 4^ U) 4^ tn 0 Aw 10W to -t") • 4.1 U) 4-4 U) 4-1 (0 4^w iW U)(Ti 4^ W rf c (J3 i-H I (/) rH fU Q) T) •H O O rH O O • >1 rH 0) JQ dt: c O >1 o N rH *H Q44J T3 -H -H 0 4J »T3 W -r| rH 'O ^ 4^ D CQ >iTJ -Q 0) r- CD in rH >1 O CO TJ X VH CD I a </) (D U O C H •H 4J rH 3 6 ro CDc ^ O N 4J 4J flJ > o E -U 0u 0 CD 00 »o rH T3 0*0 0 c 0 4J M c ja a c 0 0 0 C M -H d «• « 0 0 -Q 0 3w ,a <|4J E U O' iH 44 0 <|o 0 u C C •H ox: u C 0 V4 0 -H 3 0 4J c a •■» 0 U 4J XI >4 -H ^ a . r-4 C r-4 t4 C 0 0 3 >1 CA-H »-| .H 0 0 Q 0 M c x: 0 0 X3 44 0"0 •H 0 ,9 E J4 fJ'-H M . 4J -H E 0 3 0 C >1 MH 0^33 C 44 -H V K ^ 0 •H C r-i C >1'0 0X n a 0 W 0 rH 0 0 (D 0 0 0 Xi N .H 0 0cnox: M 4-) C 0 0 0 d 44 0 X> 0 e 0 >4 a u 4J 0 44 >>1 3 x: 0 0 00M >1 0 XJ rH 4J c V4 C00 3 XI U .0 0 a 4-4 Ot 0 fQ Q| 0 4J 0 0 0 P3| t4 u V4 XI 0 4J 0 0 c c 0 • 0u0 3 c x:•H *H 4J 0 ^ 4J d 0 0 •H C 0 0 0 :3 4H *H t7i V4 0 0 c u ccr> »4 C 0 0 0 0 *a U)0 M 0 -H .DO' -H M >1 V4 © a 44 6 0 T3 V4 0 (0 rH 0 a 6 0 3 4J rH 0 x: E d 3 e 3 -H C C 3 > 4J tr-H C X 00 rH 000 1 0 0 u x; 0 0 u 4J c 0 x: >4 0 c c 0-Hx: 0 4J 0 O' 0 0 CD x: 0 4-» x:a 3 C -H -Hx:4J »4 4-1 0 0 -H 4J M 4J 0 'O 0 >1 C -H 0 0 Vl-'O 0 •H x: -H T3 > 0)0 0 -H 0 > 4-» - 0 ^3 CD TJ x: > TJ •H P l4 4J 0 0 'O 3 4^-H P ^3 44 XJ P »H 0 'O rH •H C 0 0 - rH 0 u t E x: 00C *0 1 c 1 3 44 4-> C C •H c -H 0 rH 0 0 •H 0 0 0 0 0 0 N I Cn I 0co ^3 0 « 4J 0 c e c c o > 0 o d u N Cu M 0 cn 0 o d iTk -p d c 0 c O N N C C T3 -H O W 0 0 £ 'O *H O 0 c 4J -H 4J 4J -H C H 0)uu U)cu •H (1) •H V4 «tJ 4-1 <1> «H «>> >0 u o > o o o > (U U « U tJ u o a'O M 'O *o *00 m »-i 0* M ^4^0 ttJ ^ 0 0 0 M no 0 S S S • X 0 0 jc n ^ a: > tr»4JO'>iCr'a0'O o u 0 > o tj ■M O •0 U 0 >ou•o c 0 o M 0 0 04 *J •H W r4 0 : H (A 0 44 6 *H (A O C 0 U U 0 0 ax: 4J M 0 >o y o 0a (A a'o M c •H (A (A M tr» 0 C > •H O 3 4-» U C C0'’r0>0'OrH u 0 7D •••HC-H5*H0O00rH (0 •H »-i to 4J •H U © 4J 0 0 0 ^ 0 •H X 0 *•c 0 x: 0 > 0 uii'o a 0 0 x: 0 0 •H 4-> •H -H •H 0 >4 0 rH 0 -0 0 •H X-HXV4XV40V4rHX:0 44 44 m 0 0 0 4J w ^w*owc4x :pu <C4J n 0 0 in m rH u 1 CN 1 1 0 • • • • • • 0 I 0 0 V4 < CQ U Q Mb in in 0 •H CN in Q •• ;:.V- ' ^ i ■m St i:'’:€-W' '^' mmi v>> v«* mM fflP'P ;j« '^r-^' ■ :■ ■ :- \-?-Syr?i'•'i-, . ' ’ I’ c"fl' -- •» -. V t y» ; -« A : ^ * K A - - ‘'15< m *l'.W.i; i Ni rA|» *<: «-1’-X*f" 'O-.v’S'i': ' ■■ .;-„ ■ ^#*.- ■ v.~ .- '' V ■- -aTA,, ^ '. 'i ..., ''. • W-v-: ‘4-^ ^^ K '■' ' ' “- / ■• ^ ?^-W ;^-vv - ■ '“ 'r-- "•‘a ; >’• V ' . ' j k -*v *-r m AO LOOKING NORTHEAST - BEGINNING OF DOCK UP SLOPE IN AREA OF PROPOSED STAIR LOCATION. PUMP HOUSE SHOWN LOOKING EAST - MIDWAY BETWEEN PUMP HOUSE AND FRONT YARD (upper left) /S^ r^* :. ■■' . B/.® . : ■ .':C V^:5 '^fl^^:?ob I ' ■ - A :• ^>:^ ^ ■ ;: ^. ;rfP i'’?’ *^ ’* •*^1 . V.' .' . '. ,\-.v/^ ^w;^y.'V • • fc . ^ V ''■■ -.*1 ..i‘-'’i'^. ^ .*• ^4 , '■ . .f •^ . 1 ^ S^£L'~ f .*•• T^. , -r ' " ’ ^ K ». .• . 4 ^ >w^ ^•- -n < V-rV-..‘v-V'5^. d£ff aalSXit^ LOOKING EAST - SLOPE FROM FRONT YARD - PROPOSED UPPER PLATFORM IN LOCATION OF DIRECTORS CHAIRS UPPER LEFT CORNER LOOKING EAST - DEGREE OF SLOPE FROM YARD DOWN TO SHORE AREA mt'-'• •• #|F-^. '•‘5> r ' V N J' - ■.'W * • • V;il-: '•'■ » ‘‘ ,1, •% u \V^ .’/ rl«l ’ k\'—-'-:{>y- ’- V- r ■■'- •-4» .V ■> • • . ■=■ j L . > * • * * ■ .^' <•-**» ^ ^ ^ ' tJ^’f • r• /» ^ ^ ' . '• • . J . V ' > % < ■/rrr -fa f •< '.••1 /■^.N r.-*».v 1• %'» ■i' ,cr.xr.»» /' ’ VV-f-r 4;_ /•%5' r' LOOKING WF.ST - ROCKS IN PLACE TO PREVENT FURTHER EROSION. PUMP HOUSE TO RIGHT OF CAMERA • ^ f ' V' ^ •r •; .-’> . -r. • • k '. ■ ■ / ii ♦ ■ ^ r-*-.- ' .r 2S>* - ' Iv ’ ~ ^ ^ ■ • 'J^vy..-' LOOKING NORTH - NEXT TO PUMP HOUSE LOOKING STRAIGHT UP IN AREA OF PROPOSED STAIR SYSTEM ‘r. i^r-^ ■ v - ^ M^mM--mm r."" . '.^.**7 ;-'i^ »'i •'‘■f*;'^¥S’ '• J;i .. . V* •• ^ • - ^ ‘ 'jHi •*♦• ••'-x*r ^.’r^’ , i' -'. * >* •-* ■ .. ■'v,- ;-'.V''. 'T ,-. ' i-' ' ' ' •' '■•'^ vS- • ■’■^ --v ,?? • -^-f. - - ■.•,.;-.'J^r .'.v.'/A?'"' % *. -<V y >/ 7T"t-iv iif v:% « V 'v.v V*; ■* '*•' *^ P?I25^ !1 i V,^'^-4 ('i> LOOKING SOUTH - VIEW STRAIGHT DOWN SLOPE TO DOCK AT RIGHT - GROUP OF TREES ARE DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF PROPOSED STAIR SYSTEM WHEN VIEWED FROM LAKE . of' .9..^,? ^ MM? I -■^T' V ^ ^ fT*I -> >* ^ < w ' > V-# • ‘ #=£'•. '■- -'- A*' . .4^4- • •■■■•'/. — \ u", »• ^ ^ . . -. i" - . V < r'C ' V‘ .•.. if »» *» - 4^ » _ ■* . ' ^ V » - ■ ' ’ >1 jm* 1 ^ ■ ^ " J ■. r - .- ^ V-. .•» ' f * ■.V 'T- ' ’ '' '*"’h.'. ;o--. •L- • ■••r'% *V * ' vN 9 * ^ . c. LOOKING SOUTH - PROPOSED STAIR SYSTEM TO RUN ON LAKE SIDE OF THIS 'VSHAPED TREE TRUNK ^ r 1 »> V '• 'A m- » - r« V \ ^ T -• . /' '' ' ■■■Va - V..., -U /k%.- - ^ J Wi'V '%N %* ■ ' /5 •’••'" '4Xi. ■> ^ .'t't j ’'•V <1 »5as^/' 1 ^ , ■OOI- IJ > LOOKING NORTHWEST - UP SLOPE TO FRONT YARD L Toi Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Pr(Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:October 16, 1986 Subject: #1086 Charles Pexa, 1200 Lyman Avenue Sketch Plan Review - Subdivision Zoning District ~ RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Lot Area Required - 2.0 acres Application - Split off a 2-plus acre building lot from existing 4.9 dry acres. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E - Application - Survey - Plat Map of Area - Easements For Right-of-way on Property - 3 Precedent Variance Cases Pertinent FaC^s Proposed Parcel A; 1.54 Acres dry contiguous south of private driveway/road easement 1.06 Acres dry contiguous north of easement 2.60 Acres Dry Total (Requires a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) - see discussion) Proposed Parcel B: 2.0 Acres dry contiguous (with existing house) south of road easement Wetlands - total about 0.7 acres on the property (both Parcels A & B) Septic Testing - has not been commenced pending Planning Commission recommendation regarding variances to contiguous lot area requirement. 1 r -3 Zoning File #1086 October 16, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Discussion: This is a request to divide off a new building site from the 4.9 dry acres with existing residence. Staff recommended that it be submitted as a sketch plan because the new lot would be divided approximately in half by a private easement road that serves the existing house and 5 other properties (3 houses, 2 buildable lots). The new lot would not have 2 contiguous dry acres in either the north or south parcel, as is required in Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B). It appears that a house could be located to meet the 50* front, 30* side, and 26* wetland setbacks. Exhibits D indicate the easements we have documented on file as being granted between property owners in the neighborhood. If all of these are still in effect, they somewhat reduce the calculated dry creditable areas on the property. Perhaps applicant can enlighten us as to which easements are current. Staff has found 3 precedent cases where variances have been granted to allow credit of area on both sides of a private road easement: Orono Oaks Lot 13 - 1978 1.4 ac/0.6 ac Greentrees Lot 2 - 1980 0.8 ac/1.2 ac Balsawood Lot 2 - 1984 1.16 ac/1.67 ac A Final Issue - since the private easement road serves a total of 6 lots (7 if this application is approved) should we create a 50* road out lot? Note that the City lias been granted a road easement by quit-claim deed over a portion of undeveloped potential cul-de-sac at the southwest corner of the east portion of Tract A (see plat map. Exhibit C), and as an outlet a further portion for cul-de-sac from Tract C. We have allowed some past subdivisions in similar easement road areas without requiring dedication of outlets as right-of-way, we have in some cases required that outlets be dedicated. From a planning and fire safety standpoint, staff feels it would be prudent to have this easement road as an outlet. If it is an outlet, how would you treat the contiguous lot area variances? Reconnnendation: Applicant wishes direction from Planning Commission as to whether he has a feasible plat and whether you would recommend granting the necessary variances for contiguous lot area. Of course, because this is a private road, we would also be granting a variance for no frontage on a public street. Staff would also request your direction as to where the "front lot line setback" should be measured from - the lot line (which lot line is front?) or the road easement line (if this road becomes a private road outlot, the setbacks are more clearly defined). PJ fI ,R *C2i- CITY OP ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Date Rec'd lO"/l‘ By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Fee Rec'd IrsrO’'^ K^-cr'T APPLICANT Name W cv r V ^ i ^ v.C\. Mailing Address \Xcj*>-> Telephone ^ ^ W) PROPERTY Name OWNER Telephone /T V/ Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address \loo U Property Identification ilo. (P.I.D.) ^3 OozM Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE \Number of Tax Parcels Development Size on t \(o ii Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District | ^ PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites \Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) _ _ _ __ (OVER) 3- 5^(1' r V/ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONy 1. Application Completed /^2, Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3, Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. •' •' ' Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park feesr filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate', of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i -'I FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $300.00 plus 20.00/lot $150.00* Applicant has read thg^jibove andTiereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planni Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. lanners SKETCH I# 1 flI«/l067 . t.. B•'V OF TRACT HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ^ 0014A-T / y —/.u^-B ^ . yAHir<.^ I>/D //'»Arj3 A('/^•^T 'rz> viut^/-p!^(^^z ^'V'.A/K 'f * ^ I / /^' ’ pt^'^'7^^ f ^■'- ''I puyT" itjrrH /Z [p. y Cf.u.-i,;7-^\/tC'^U'^i^ ^/j oA-e cipc' of~ eA-:***^ ^ //^oaP ^/ cTH^/c of^ Ho^z^ --■ V 'a/ ■UL/' /•...-- X X // x/' V , 7(94.5 -f7^rr?^:r (f^ f jcr Jz r ^ 5t Pi”) ^ THt? /^<eo/'^t-y'«*-Ty C.c?Dt- tAOOt^Ula* SAV /VO ^^JL- ) ^ A-r- / 9‘h^'T^ f>o^cteic sAac T2^ Ti> to a/ - -p p C^r^-nr*^f-c>oj^,^.^j 4rV<Cr'»^T7cy'4£ rV^'T /^T ^ « *_. . Scale: 1" = 100' Date : 10 - 1 - 86 0 : Iron marker COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota C?^r76.KOKS f4^J /. S ^ '■■ (syz.o kyxRAXJ€OU.S (^.A^; ^,l^j^‘l'P> \ /a> wmretiei^s. ^.IZ. ncTCA^ev^ S ^ c,-^. ► 5* / . 0? <L : SKETCH Sk'-tc; f'.'.r * C,• j ♦• J »•cf ^ # J * • • *• d-i'cv,-.^ *.:r. . . .n; 1:»i:/ji. ,' % ■ V* - # * V» 4> t « f w hurv;../ t ••f,,. , 1 ..• • • 4 •»i 1 # ♦ . 1 4 • tso 47 i. y IHii) lira "‘-uHltROm1067 •r*: r t «. A •r / ca.^ Cmcr\'V ’! * ,.fc> A -I |:?^A r-\TO TO V. ... Nfi7«45'40*VC'704.5 o ov«'i* Tr.icts A !»riu E Tr.ut p>>-t of fr' rts a -.r.fl ?, i.Jf>*’ *' i* i.ra cts n 6i;rvcv Ll.o, 1067, oi Iv.*i;3r«ti\.r o*' Titi*j;j, C:’.y<iy of ■■cnri-f ir., lyirit. v.llhlnf ^5~* on ec.nr. ci;:e of th-j roilowint-Oorci j lf.: r :;.tvrli:;c : Corj^.oJiciny <.t the Sox:lh;.o£o co:r.*jr of r ti i Tract B; thenco on :-.r: •:sr.u!r.cd be irin;- cf I'orth £7°46'40” rtcr.t cr, the Acoterly oxtenpim o: ti..- Bc'jlh of s-.i'f Tr«ct 5 a dirturcc cf 13 fest tc the pc..ls.t of bo- ir:riri, of U,*» contur—• ^ % lino bcin,: dosorited; liior.re rorth JjriLl .i di'.taiic.o of 66,feet; \ th'.-rice^*ilon{' a tinitcntiul curve to tii(* having* n ruc-iuc of 120 fect and ct-nt'-el of 47° h ditlicco of 9'’.44 foot; thcr.oo t'erth arrt a dis tance 67,80 J’cet; 1!'-nro i-lco, •. t-.r ^entii-.! citrvr tc the r1.*:.t havirf a } I ri>'‘iurjof T/.C fof*t '-i.c r:;-tr\l ?j.>1 v of IP^ o djrtnr.r.,;> of Ifp.rv feot; tkence toT't!) 73°20 ’ libst n ci‘.t:ir.cc cf 2.0,63 fe-jt; thonc: clon^ v t.r;;..:.ti?-l curve to t!;*? ri.V.t h*ivinj u radjuc of 120 foot ar.i centra l ••.r.. le of 72° a ciJct-.rcc* of lff,c0 feet, '»tliorc ar.cJnr. cl;rv"~or:l •»•!•*r.jn nl’it of *■;'vean C rrharcs*' Th-r:! part of fhirles Street vacated, and of iictc 26 and 26, "Cror.o t rch irclr/', lyir.,. vilhin /g" feet on oaci. .-.jv'v ol' tJie frillox-ini;- dcicrili'.'J rertcsrliric: Cori;vnrat liia Oeuthvor.t rorrv.r of the Southeatt oiinrter of .'.•cctJnn 33> Tcuriid'.ip 118 l.ortn, itan^c 23 V.eat of the 6th i'rincipul Keridiarij thvncc on an ar£.r.rjcd Itn: rinj^ offKorlh 87°43'40” hest on th«j i.-pstori:* c.^lvncion of the South line of Southeast cuerter u distance of 13 foot; thrrre forth 14*^20* Eaat a di/taiice of 100 to ti-.c point of Ic^inninf of tlic centorlin-.- Icln^ dearrihed; th.'r.uc- Soutli 14°20' V.est a '*.!'.t-.nce of ICC feut; thence aloni.' a tf.r.fjenlial cui'vc- to t } •> ri(^':t ’.::.vini ^ radius of fpi’l ;m a c.:nLj.ii -r.,,le cf 3C<° a d-at-/«.»; c ’ 122,17 f^ct. :.-nc lijero ending.I /, % Scale : iiu U) : !’• = 100* 4-12-7V Gordon h. rnffjr. liec» fc, 6O64 Alvin !., llchcior ite^. Ho. 13296 U, r.d f.ur\tiycr;. and ilanriors Lon," Lc.Le, I-.innesota liarfh \ & 8 ns^ __ -iISJk' 3»-g9 .. ■:®‘ • I & JftM «oif 5> A r»A V SJN S‘ J f a.! /fa/4 •' > \ S C» ^ ^ f*> 2 l^§ 8 \| A .s| tt 1 •M S'- 1 1 O 1 Ir f ____________ _ jHtr |- . ' 1^'•r. ?*•»ft r>»r?f 'O t • “• 1 — . I nV \ \ Date: Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P, Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 17, 1986 Subject: Information Item - 500 Tonkawa Road The tennis court contractor for Dr. Glen Nelson, at 500 Tonkawa Road, commenced grading work without permits. Staff's review of the site indicates that a conditional use permit review is necessary for the extensive grading work and retaining walls proposed. Mr. Nelson appeared at the Council meeting on 10/13/86 for his guest apartment variance and was approved, then he requested some relief regarding the tennis court project which staff had stopped. Council directed staff to allow Mr. Nelson to complete the retaining walls and to finish the grading work at his own risk subject to an after—the—fact conditional use permit application and review. (The review process would have stalled the completion of the grading and walls until spring, leaving an unsupported, unsafe excavation over the winter.) This will be scheduled Tor an after“the—fact conditional use permit review at the November Planning Commission meeting. O' , / }•'f 9 ^ / 0 y 1