The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-15-1986 Planning PacketPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 7:30 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOUIE - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDANCE PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:30 p.m. #1076 -Jim Grabek 2. 7:45 p.m. #1077 Ward Krueger, 205 & 215 Hollander Road Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Ingeborg Cici, 875 Wayzata Boulevard - Variance ACTION ITEMS 3.#1065 4.#1066 5.#1067 6.#1068 7.#1069 8.#1070 9.#1071 10.#1072 11.#1073 12.#1074 13.#1075 SKETCH PLAN 14. #1079 Variance - Public Hearing Ann L. Carson, 1317 North Arm Drive Variance - Public Hearing Herbert T. Olson, 3640 Bayside Road Variance - Public Hearing Dr. Glen Nelson, 500 Tonkawa Road Variance - Public Hearing Jim Williams, 2725 Ethel Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Variance - Public Hearing Colen Kelly/Lona Jane 5^^^ughnessy, 95 South Brown Road Variances - Public Hearing Fred Winston, 755 Spring Hill Road - Variance - Public Hearing James Deanovic, 2050 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Grace Baptist Church, 2830 Shadywood Road Variance - Public Hearing Variances - Public Hearing Sketch Plan Review for Proposed Rezoning, Subdivision and Conditional Use Permit ADDITIONAL ITEMS 15. Planning Commission approval of August 18, 1986 minutes. 16. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the October 7, 1986 Council Meeting. ADJOOR PUBLIC ATTENDANCE P.C, CITY np ORONO MEETING DATE ^-IS - PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) /^Ae^jAJ/iAu / »~~Se'^4 a/ 0~\ a I >1 Lt. r ^ Yff"; A/iJ^ (Sir c* rv f St. .fi'g gj U <amnla fU 3 (toipS') 3 I lOhS) LCtll iI •r :A ♦ I . t. ' « V‘ ; i .Ti •V ■ • \ •;3 .Vi ICI /077 zi .yl ^3^ jf*7 ZZLII J /V. 0/ g f ./ >y^L^ fAuLPlKJ^r^ /^6^/v.p.:X. h..r/.iUL / 0 G L 4uS' 0Fnf->O0:-b r (ST/'^fc" /Aiy^r./oo^ \ 0 \A<^.i/r j- jAjitiAr ^/^//ti K//i(f\.^!lLi KiXUUn ^ 15 ,/ ^ ^ /! 1 7. 1 . c-'W-t ^ 0, Lolor^s •iX''^Vx alJu.L^'J^^}1^7/? /¥- /Hy'^ Ctcyn/c^ ^ V /v d <j- ^ ay.,. ^ I z ^./n 72-L Qo'-f<T y-()(019 '^O *S « V^v^lv^cno Jitc £ir->/- »> /fy /<^y"7 ^ Spi'i ~ /t( ' / (ly!li>7.X ivi3f\\‘i.Vo.''(L^’(r'J<i, \01S' .*1 . 1 - * { * i 'A ! '• \ •A r To: aa) .1 From: Date: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 10, 1986 Subject: #1076 Ward Krueger, 205-215 Hollander Road - Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB Application - Rearrange interior lot lines of 3 existing 2-acre lots. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Pertinent Facts: Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Site Plan With Septic Locations Topography and Septic Locations Lot 3 (215 Hollander - Existing House) - Existing = 2.0 Acres - Proposed to be Tract 3 (E & F) Proposed = 2.047 Acres Lot 4 (205 Hollander - Vacant) Existing = 2.0 Acres - Proposed to be Tract 1 (A & B) Proposed = 1.966 Acres Lot 5 (99 Sixth Avei.ue North - Vacant) Existing =. 2.3 Acres - Proposed to be T-act 2 (C & D) Proposed * 2.267 Acres Discussion: This is a request to rearrange existing lot lines to create lots which are perhaps more usable given the topography of the site. The proposal does not create any new lots. The existing house on Tract 3 will not be adversely affected by the proposal. The County has previously granted an access off County Road 6 for Tract 2. Note from the septic site diagram that Tracts 1 and 3 will still have tested primary and alternate drainfield sites within their boundarxes, but Tract 2 loses most of its previously tested area. Additional testing on Tract 2 will be required before the proposal is brought to the Council. Due to sandy soils found througnout this subdivision, staff does not expect any problems with soils on Tract 2. ots. Zoning File #1076 September 10, 1986 Page 2 Note that Tract 1 is proposed at slightly under 2 acres (1.966 acres or 98.3%). The division was proposed as it is to make use of existing corner pins and to create parallel lot lines on Tract 2. This does mean that Tract 1 technically requires a lot area variance, which is not a common practice, although the density is still 2+ acres the division. The alternative is to make Tract 1 larger by moving the west line of Tract 2 east about 4 H feet. Measured parallel to County Road 6, Tract 2 will still have a width of just over 200*. Staff would rather see this line moved than to try to gain area from Tract 3 by moving the south line of Tract 1, since this might cause an encroachment on the existing drainfield of Tract 3. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval subject to moving the west line of Tract 2 easterly so that Tract 1 will meet the 2.0 acre area standard, and subject to septic testing for Tract 2 be submitted and approved prior to Council review of the application, finding that under these conditions the proposal meets all lot standards of the RR-lB zone. It-. CITY OP ORONO SUBDIVISION APFLICATI ii:J iJ ''if ij Date Rec'd 8C>By •flO__________ Fee Rec*dy/^5‘<g>g>o APPLICANT Name Telephone PROPERTY Name OWNER Mailing Address Telephone Mailing Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) ^/A5^5_ _ _ _ _ Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)C;;]^^R^ident^lS* no. of units Stlrei^ ("Spe^fy) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites; Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use; (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land __Rej^dent^ DLh^ "HfSpeeifvy) (OVER) 1-SU1.00 ble %MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) . ^ ^ . Stamped t le9dl sized envelopes (#10) pre—addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Departmeni that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Pinal Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $300.00 plus 20.00/lot $150.00* Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature! Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals intone City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. JiU N: J! JVJ iill lU tt d: r o oco < q: o 0 OZiU<0 < >• \< Ct < UJ Q. UJ Q. 3:CL 0 ± X -t 0p:U < Z U. 0 H rta l>LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 1 Parcel A That part of Lot 4, Block 1, HOLLY ACRES 2ND ADDITION, accord ing to the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line drawn northwesterly from the southeast corner of said Lot 4 to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 4, distant 231.69 feet southwest of the northwest corner thereof. Parcel B AREA That part of Lot 5, Block 1, HOLLY ACRES 2ND ADDITION, accord ing to the recorded plat thereof, lying westerly of a line drawn southerly from the northwest corner of said Lot 5 to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 5, distant 244.07 feet northwest of the southeast corner thereof. ■■ 1.966 acres 85,618 Sq. Ft. TRACT 2 Parcel C That part of Lot 5, Block 1, HOLLY ACRES 2ND ADDITION, accord ing to the recorded plat thereof, lying easterly of a line drawn southerly from the northwest corner of said Lot 5 to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 5, distant 244.07 feet northwest of the southeast corner thereof. Parcel D That part of Lot 3, Block 1, HOLLY ACRES 2ND ADDITION, accord ing to the recorded plat thereof, lying easterly of a line drawn southerly from a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 3, distant 244.07 feet northwest of the northeast corner of said Lot 3, to a point on the south line of said Lot 3, dis tant 196.94 feet west of the southeast corner thereof. AREA » 2.267 Acres 98,734.08 Sq. Ft. TRACT 3 Parcel E That part of Lot 3, Block 1, HOLLY ACRES 2ND ADDITION, accord ing to the recorded plat thereof, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 3, dis tant 244.07 feet northwest of the northeast corner of said Lot 3 to a point on the south line of said Lot 3 distant 196.94 feet west of the southeast corner thereof. _________ A* j>>- *3 .------ w < To:Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members Pr(Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: September 10, 1986 #1077 Mrs. Ingeborg Cici, 875 Wayzata Boulevard - Variance to Limited Development Ordinance (Ordinance 13, Second Series) Planning Commission Action Prior to making a formal recommendation for Application #1062, Mrs. Cici's conditional use permit/commercial site plan application. Planning Commission must first act on approval of a variance to the temporary moratorium ordinance involving the Highway 12 Study Area. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Application Plat Map Property Owners List Ceritificate of Mailing Legal Notice Bouley Letter to Kilbo Bouley Letter to Council Access Plan - Staff Sketch The eastern portion of the Highway 12 Corridor has had little attention because early in the review process the City determined that the current residential zoning would remain unchanged and that it would not be cost effective to extend municipal services from Wayzata or Long Lake. This specific area was to be opened to innovate quasi/commercial uses that proved compatible with surrounding residential zoning and required no extension of municipal services. One of the purposes of this study was to develop standards for commercial uses for the vast stretv'-hes of Highway 12 that will remain residential and not served by sewer or water. The proposed use is already deemed compatible with current residential zones and based on preliminary review of septic testing and applicant's plan to sprinkle the nursery school structure, there appears no need for municipal services now or in the future. The site well exceeds the required 2 acres in dry buildable area. As staff noted in the review of last month, the main concern in the development of this site is the issue of safe access. 4 4 Zoning File #1077 September 10, 1986 Page 2 Staff has met on the site on 2 occasions to determine the best access location. The engineer's report is not available for enclosure in your packets but will be available for discussion at your meeting. The cemetary access in Wayzata is not considered safe as far as sighting distance relates to 40-55 MPH speeds. The engineer recommends a shared access along the mutual lot lines of cemetary and proposed nursery school property. The State Highway Department will provide a left turn lane - (see diagram enclosed, Exhibit H). Chief Kilbo is most concerned with access to this site and has recommended moving the nursery school access as far east as possible and a left turn aisle. Kilbo's comments were completely independent of the other reviewing staff members. Note Exhibits F G, it would appear Orono residents along that same stretch of Highway 12 are also concerned with the safe use of the site. Access to the new facility will be forced to intersect the designated wetlands. The engineer has been advised to establish construction standards for the proposed road. The M.C.W.D. and Corp. of Engineer will have to review the road plans of applicant. City must grant a variance/conditiona J use permit if road must be located to east of property; the area designated as a wetland. Mrs. Cici has been advised of the approved location and has voiced concern with additional costs involved with a road that must intersect a wetland area. Application 1062 has been tabled by staff until your October 21st meeting because final submittals nor final plans were completed by required deadline dates. Planning Commission may act on the variance to the moratorium separately, staff recommends approval as follows: To approve Ingeborg Cici's variance application to the limited development (Ordinance 13, Second Series) for a property located at 875 Wayzata Boulevard located within the eastern portion of the Highway 12 Planning Study based on the following findings: 1. The proposal is not found to be in conflict with the current Comprehensive Plan nor any amendments considered or proposed by the City. 2. Standards for such reviews have already been established for such uses. 3. If access is located per recommendation of reviewing staff, there shall be no adverse impact on the health, safety or welfare of the general public. r s .1 <*»*»«»" < • ' ^ ^ * ‘ ' •* >“*i I \ '• * • • •' t r' ! . •r • *» . I » r ‘ • >x*-V A CAnioii ji CITY ' * GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION £1Q5L7fo'7 ‘5 vjoiv^: 13 Acres, more or less on South side of Hwy. 12 Site Address Address still to be assigned. Property Identification Number (P.I.d.) 35-118-23-43-0005 ffor ^Con^ffei’nn®."!® f7 X abstract ortror Conditional Use Applications only)torrens? L^“«d“VurvV'’*^ acscrlption to application If not included on applicant Mrs. Ingeborg Cici, President of Busy Beaver Day Care, Inc. W-473-6245 ***®® -Mr. Pandeli M. Cici, husband______ Phone 420-2789 Hailing Address 7532 Troy Lane, Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 ONNBR Welling Oonpany Neune Mr. R. K. Bergeson, President Phone 475-0111 Mailing Address 16605 - 13th Avenue North, Plymouth, Minn. 55447 Date Property Acquired _ 7G (month/year) I (do) nq^-) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS * $100.00 a)Residential accessory Use X, $150.00 b)Institutional (church, scl $150.00 c)Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d)Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 £)Land Alteration Grading and filling •• 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Thst part of the Southeast 1/4 of the SE W of Section 35, Township 118, North Range 23, W of the 9th Principal Meridian descirbed as follows: Beginning at a point on the W line of said SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4, 29.7 feet North of the NEly line of the right of way of the Great Northern Railway Company; thence N along the H line of said SE 1/4 of SE 1/4^ to the S line of the right of way of the Electric Short Line RaI Kay Company; thence Ely along the South line of sold Electric Short Line Railway Company to the SWiy line of State Hwy 12, formerly No. 10; thence SEly along said SWIy line of said Highway to a point distant 385 feet measured at right angles from the S line of Section 35; thence Wly parallel with and distant 385 feet measured at right angles from the S line of said Section 35, a distance of 1011.05 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO, all that part of the SW 1/4 of tho SE 1/4 of Section 35/118/23 lying S of the SEIv ight of way line of tho Electric Short Line Railway Company and NEly of the NEly right of way lino of tho Great Northern Railway Company. OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. __ _ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning #1077 (V $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential x Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:a?‘a*^]a^er Center now and fi Residfigce REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2.Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obta Cernter County Department of Finance A-603 Governme: 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the nam ori the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ~ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or • requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE i. c Date 3(i j The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. f^/1 fU.,Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the Citv oc ^ i. Planning Commission Meetino PiAnn^nrr r* • offices 25 days before the third Monday of each month.^* ^ Commission Meetings are held on the {^1 s Vr 1 ^io 'ii/>\ ^ 1 \a» \ \f^ 1 ■ <0^n niA VCM O 0N O ui m ch 3 H uj tt a* d:to tt i; o tt X DoO3x0C3 < tt aoOZ ui <0 z Ui <c <>- \< >• NXtt < Ui tt < UiuCLuj a 2:CL UJ a orHO?: X <0 Z X -{«<n:U < z c>. £c < ::sCOu.a H u. 0 H CITY OP ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, September 15, 1986, at 7:45 P.M. on the matter of Ingeborg Cici's application #1077 for a variance to the temporary ordinance limiting development within the Highway 12 Study Corridor in order to permit the construction of a day care/nursery school on property located at 875 Wayzata Boulevard. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Please make an appointment with staff to review the plans. City of Orono By; Planning Commission Jea^e A. Mabusth, Building & Zonina ,Zoning Administrator To be published the week of September 1, 1986 in the Laker and Pioneer Newspaper. L m Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police Orono-Long Lake Police Dept. 445 Willow Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Chief Kilbo: Enclosed is a letter to the Orono City Council regarding a nursery school-day care center proposal just east of us bordering the Luce Line Trail off Highway 12. We just wanted you to know this information and the danger it would be to have people with small children entering and leaving that particular corridor of Hwy 12. My father had written to you a couple years ago and also wrote to the Commissipner of the Highway Dept, regarding the accidents we have had near, in front of, our driveway. We all work or go to school East of our residence(now that they have all graduated from Orono H.S.)and we all have the burden of trying to turn left into our home with traffic passing us on the shoulder and coming at us from the west. Both my son and myself have been hit. Both of our cars have been totaled. Also you may know that all of the mailbo;»es on the right shoulder (N) have been wiped ouc and the last accident I know of was the first week of August when I signaled to turn left and cars were not slowing down and there were several fender benders behind us. The traffic on the freeway is traveling approximately 65 m.p.h. -(^ive or take 5 m.p.h^ as it turns into a 2-way residential area that is posted 45 m.p.h. W( in our family, all slow down to 45 still traveling at least 60m.p.h. m.p.h. and every car behind us passes I don't know what the solution is - I thought that Highway 12 was going to bypass Long Lake! V.'e know we have to signal, brake, brake and pray a lot. Maybe if there were enough "speed-traps" at that point the usual commuters would get the idea to slow down? The police department is welcome to sit in our driveway anytime. Thanks for checking it out a couple years ago in answer to my father's letter. Sincerely, Margie Bouley 915 West Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 [1 © 1- SEP - 5 1986 September 2, 1986Orono City Council 1335 South Brown Road P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear City Council Members: We live on Highway 12 next to the property that is proposing a day-care and nursery school No. 1062. We are just on the west side of the Luce-Line Trail. This is my opinion: 1. It is very poor judgement to put this type of facility on Highway 12 because of the operating time. Highway 12 is heavily traveled, very dangerous and overused. The freeway comes to an end just before this property and as we well know, the traffic does not slow down even though the speed limit is posted at 45m.p.h. (which is too high) You should check with your own police department on this matter. The accident rate is high and there have been a lot of near-collisions. 2. On this property, there is no access to sewer or water and in the near future they will request sewer and water at the expense of the city (plus extra road care) and the nearby landowners. 3. Being a landowner bordering this property, we should have been notified rather than seeing a sign posted on the property and I don't believe it is properly zoned for a school. Sincerely, Eugene J. Bouley 915 West Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 cc: Long Lake City Council Orono Police Chief-Mel Kilbo M I-* U ^OsX* . 4 4 yA___- i f Tos Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Fron: Date: Michael P. Gaffron^ Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 12, 1986 Subject: #1065 Larry & Jean Martineau, 4360 Chippewa Lane Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IA, 5-acre Application - Mother-in-law apartment within principal residence under construction. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - House Plans & Elevations Discussion: Applicant is requesting to construct a basement kitchenette that will effectively create a mothe.'-in-law apartment with bath, bedroom, and ^i^®^®nette. Access is gained through the main house stairway and walkout level doors, as well as an indirect access to garage. The intent is for Mr. Martineau's mother to move in with them in a year or two. This application is nearly identical to a recent application on Luce Line Ridge for a similar basement apartment. Again, the house is designed essentially as a one-family residence in a one-family zone, and will fit in with the character of the neighborhood. Staff Recoomendation: Staff recommends approval of a "temporary two-family dwelling" status variance for the Martineaus, per Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A)7, with the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS 1. The applicants intend the apartment to be used as a guest apartment only and have no intent to rent the apartment. 2. The apartment, as designed, is on the walkout level of the house and may be accessed from within the main house as well as from direct exit to the rear yard at the walkout level, or indirectly to the garage. CONDITIONS 1. The main entrance to the house shall remain as an open foyer, forcing the apartment occupant to enter the apartment from within the main house, as shown on the proposed design plans. 2. This use variance is granted on a temporary basis and shall expire at such time that the applicants no longer own the property. Any new owner would have to reapply for the guest apartment use. The temporary variance is not transferable to a new owner without Council approval. 3. The mother-in-law apartment shall not be rented out and is intended fnr the sole use of the applicants while they are occupants of the principal residence and their non-paying guests or domestic employees. i GENERAL LaJI^OSE ^ELI^«»6n '^W<^ 1 ' V / i -••-• / .' /GCvCZ^ C>UP 1 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 7 >") /•((' i <( / rN ' t*' ( * yl /IL / Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 3/- //^- ^Jyn torrens?Please check one - Is the property c—^ abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only)i Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name 4 J Phone Mailing Address OWNER Name Lr^ r? v/ .» -j a-".-; /rj A y-r^; rJ f % A u Phone ____*7 ') ( Mailing Address -V <•/ / n;?( r\t /•/0 ^ ^ 7 7 Date Property Acquired (month/year) I tdoO (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use _______ $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ _ $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use _ _ _ _ $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. _ _ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY a Present Zoning District /y f Present Use of Property < Residential’ Other '(specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail; A > rl c >7 i/y ///</ iff 1^. C O i- k KKiTliJ <^( n ’,- / / / / • / V/- /L' /'7 // ^ i/M » r* V B^UIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Construction plan, if applicable. Plat Map. The applicant and Property Owner must Lign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant *s signature i •_</ ^ OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ ^ -i Date •7 /.i '■/ /i>c 7 The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner*s signature c Date 7//A^ / %7- Applicant must have all submittals into the City office*; V- L’ I- Ki m sr CMMa V § Ulo <a r* I lU QC £ £ N O o <^ o o 5 ac 5 ►- < CD cr 111 M (D ^ -J LU O O < Z O QC ^ MO 0 _ -l< Z lU ID Ow 2 Da M o a a M LU o K) a o < CM lU z ^ _1 H M «o < CO «« a m3 IU M ^ ^ M >- N 5 in ^ a a IU ID 1/^ M O CO ^ O O CDo a a ^ oao <VJ o o o •^5m I CD tu Li. M 0- lAro lA < M $ O CD w w 3 09 (0 Oo o a 33 xxi3islu. ID UJ •! 10 (A o aO O M <D <r z #1 o o KI CD I CO M I a a ID ^ CO K) X z lAU U ^ CL M M »"I <r s ^ r tu S3 Z a o a QO Z ID < < >• \ a < IDn: ^ IU ID a z ? X 2 fc ««c z A o CSJ o S3 Csl < ^ ID Z n CL o CSJ o. to I M a CO z ID M u Mm-4 UJ I CL m lA ID o CVI >• S5 c^ lA ro lA bJ lA Hi (A -J o S a < r u. Z UJ z "> a M CL < < M -J ^ X CL -J u UJ ID U LA CL < S 'O’ z g3 CSJ < 'O* 3 ID in CL CSJ CL I M CO X M U ID IUz z IU < CA -J c^ LAro lA LA z LU LA LU < 3 Z M I m lA 'O* tj o a O LU (A a _.&3 h* U d; tu IU LA ^ -J CO ^ a O CM <a a sr £ IU o CA O* LAro LA lA 33g CL CL H Z a Ma a bj ^ in LA<<r LU LU < < <0 lO O gxi«-l _ U ^ CL M M «-lc £ cr r o o o csl oa c^ lAKI LA lA KI CSJ I <0 i IU LU < < ID O Qa M M £ £ I Q O a a KI d: a CO O LU UJ KI O CO CD 55 i3 I o a o S3 Ch LA KI LA lA CSJ < ^ 3 LU m CL csi a I M €0 X -• u I CO KI LA CO K) O IU Z -J a 2 < bJ Z I- -J < £ bJ Nl 3 h- IU a M a IU a CL •J IL M MOO ^SlA “ = Sn n <r M Q. •J < M IU ul a c^ r IU o <t a o O Z LU < < >- \ a < bi CL lu a z CL 5 4 z (L O M o o *^3 *J H LU lA bJ lA LU Kt CL CSJ a I M CO X M O M M Z Q Q < £ •J .J UJ Z < < Q. M X X 53 X a M tt a u m LA o O Ul O O lA -J LU LU M CLKI CO ^ KI O a a KI < O O 'O’ £ S3 *1 IU cu < 'O’ 3 IU K> a oj a I M CO X M U sss M M < .J «J □ lA KI lA lA sisf IU LU IU Zo o M Qc a I JA lA S SJA lA CSJ KI O O a a a M S;3 X a u IU lA -J Csl CL KI < lO £ COo o o CK lA KI lA lA Z IU Ma»A X M CSJ 5 a _ j>SSSM M M a a oa 55 53 M IU IU ”S§g KI a a CO o IU IU KI O “) D I LU •J o a V L (1 I Oo CSI Qa tu IL M 3 a- lAKI lAlA KI CSJ I CO tu LU aa £5555 H|OlOg2 S3 C^ lA KI lA lA ys KI a CSJ CL I M a CO X bJ _ tu i!= ri ii^< a M O M“•3 KI o a CSJ CSJ CO O’ MOO 35 % CL Ulo csl CL CSJ < CL ^ £ UJa r CD < 8 = 0.5 O eg a lU >- < CL X < M a o 8 :;3 Certificate of Survey for Larry E. Martineau in Lot 3, Block 1. Chippewa Third Addition Hennepin County, Minnesota SfT^ \ Scale; 1" = 100' Date : 7 - 10 - 86 0 : Iron marker 1 hereby certify th.it this is a true and correct representation of the proposed location of a proposed house in relation to the boundary of Lot 3, Blockl, Chippewa Third Addition. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments. COFFIN & GRONliERG. INC. i 4k •S'*. ' V »# * £e ^ fir. AccCiS TO I Jf-._.. F.'-a 1' ■:i. _/ • -” %• J / / »«••••4*> .-- ... , ; I , :.i;r.:r;..r_; _ • V ! ^ r i|ls.l r - - l|m. iRillsl"‘^S|? o > / Q(/J I- .vV if r ;.„!: . ---------—;—.a » 1 I / :P-V-.' V. ■ f%V ■' "t1 • • • 1. » / •. . V V' rH*?5 S9>^ *% ... V a- X ..-M^S ■ "1; - ^‘'AV :l‘i ur:St 5)\( ^ < . %\''' f 4 \ fH5p' / / f, *-r I 5*-^ Cl rf \r\ o \ i\ \ ^ ^ ^ ^ “ ■•4 F o / /•so - O 9-t. 7 I: » * • •• f/ 6»R 2. /// - O -X it / \ I * . »’ / »' V*/ i:-}-' / ':i» '\- ;iy te /iM C) 0)[^ 1 I s. ~".' IS ' n ;t ■■ ■ ■-■■'A ' \^5\' n'" F=5^^,tzj|: t I :-i’, t » ; n i » S'—'^‘i ?" o z i S fft ^ ^■J<' ' ■ ’XI m S S. >il — ► T Z'i-’rt -4 :k \ » m sb 10. 1/1 zESgCA V* •“ ?i 5 9 • sI .8 .« .■5 ^ <2. I ' / • ■'?o/Oo\ '.-1 %.r«! s: :i.i ivJ • ^ >>i - M I J I* V i 'IXOt n Ife°<«Z:^x T, ;Pf^“ 4 . > % r-4 V .7.%« .» >. o in^ *:o .pSsm II \ / • »•/ t J \7 i 1 A TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator September 11, 1986 #1066 Ann L. Carson, 1317 North Arm Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lB Application - Side setback. Hardcover variances to construct room addition and new decks. List of Exhibits - A * Application B - Plat map C - Property Owners List D - Survey with existing structures E - Survey with proposed changes F - Survey with Hardcover review G - Hardcover calculations Pertinent Facts - -Side Setback - Required : 10' -Side Setback - Existing : 4.6*, 7.7' -Side Setback - Proposed : Continue along 7.7* line -(Deck is not an encroachment on south side of lot) -Hardcover allowed (250-500* zone) : 30% or 3575 s.f. -Hardcover existing (250-500* zone) : 31.06% or 3700 s.f. -Hardcover proposed (250-500* zone) : 33.08% or 3940 s.f. -After construction, remaining rock w/plastic is approximately equivalent in area to net increase in structural hardcover. Discussion - This is a request to construct a room addition continuing the existing 7.7 foot setback along the south lot line. The addition incorporates decks which do not encroach on any required setbacks in the locations proposed (the deck along the south lot line is not i^onsidered an encroachment because it extends from the main floor of the house). The affected neighbors residence to the south is uphill, hence there should be relatively little impact on air, sunlight or open space etc. We have received no comments from the neighbor to the south. r f' I- it •> u ‘■«-?M' ■ ■» •-!% f ■ •}•- r' ^51 ! fI- -ir m 1 Zoning File #1066 September 11, 1986 Page 2 of 2 The neighbor to the north, Eileen Oleen, expressed a concern about the drainage onto her property from the existing garage. In fact, the Oleen property is, in its entirety, downhill from the Carson property, hence the natural drainage pattern is onto Oleen's property. It would be nearly impossible for Carson to divert drainage away from Oleen. Staff would suggest that perhaps the best thing we can do from a drainage standpoint is to not allow excessive increases of hardcover on the property. Staff RecoBBendation “ Staff would recommend approval of side setbacks and hardcover variances, based on a finding that the proposed additions will be no closer to the side lot line than the existing house, finding no significant detriment to air, sunlight or open space, and finding no net increase in hardcover conditioned on plastic underlayment being removed from the existing rock beds. An additional hardship is that this is a substandard lot created prior to current zoning standards. ' I "t . / / . J ^ /.VO.OL) Ur^ riAJ u -fl ,0 ,0#l0^o A I CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address , OlCU/ xl Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ _ _0*^ / I H f Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name V7^-7^02 to Phone 3 Mailing Address iOd‘ OWNER Name *^1 r L- C Phone Mailing Address >5/1 A)^. f^fLfW T)£ > UL Q]l0Unl , Date Property Acquired c^~l _____ (month/year) I (do)(^(^ n^)) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District ^ /C— / S Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost ^0. {)oc>ch:> Describe request in detail ^ ______XAjl. CiV>~^ O^lL 7 JLa. ' VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front >C Side Rear) Other /( UO . c- i ^ •’* * ^*** • ** I / K! y ^ * * “*• • -----^ SoP7~ /S^ ^lJk40rJ/AJ Ci - -^ 0<2^ j 3 Cot/ioc fi^ Ap P'^^^''^ HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: pyu^iv^^iuJi Oui^LXZ^ 'fjo ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP ONUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual p^perty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Co^ Requiremenjis ;fXcryvA K^l/vuw Lajax ^n (Ztey^JL REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you can obtain Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey including haidcover calculations as required. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. this application. Please not complete if the above APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual exp^.ises incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. OWNERS SIGNATURE Date V^ /^Hp The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Cl/lJ ^xS U3_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Ar^-'. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. ORONO — 3fi MOUND i u o o 7^1 , T77 ' (>3' / I__ :22' >6 . -rl-.»iv| \ ^ i»7 . ^|, . ___I M ’Jc«>^ c\ / ' jSj A■y/. .4' '/^Jm \ n*!»30‘ r?L "'TiirtvX ■>!!?''» VW V -IH 1 J'U'*-x y oX *>B^y^. y^’ Mlc./ / /4>' \ i\>^^a /V^/^7^—^A/n \ ^ ^ y 16'^^ 'vx*5r I.'*7/ f i. A/0. lA ®•M , » “ V"'X' ■>>■, y K ^A7^^y\ (i>)^ I p. p ^ J' ■>"Fffj.fl ci2~7/^? C E Qj^pn o 4} Ac *47“ <<> ! ff I 7» (iSX^ ^t£M;nn[\ '■»c^ ^ arc p-rp,” Ui^L 'V le (A'^) M O<r lA lA H Q. • UJgg I UJ K C IM H CO >- CO sM gu. Z M in M CO BUJ tF a UJ B lU >» o ^ g lA ro M S. o CQ UJ M K) »A o ^ H ^ B ftA i N ID CO^UJa A W ^ 0 N N i#%w g CO ^ -1 -J ^ 0 Ui UJ (O CO B o o o r ri-g Klro •0 K> O U.u. u. Ui u. M UJ CO M ^ CO s < o ^ £ i:g CO Bo o o B <^ ^ Kl X UJ CM P ^ _ I B Z Z N g < < Z >• >• B B K CO CO O iA <^00Kl UJ UI •H B B O U. U. % CA IA 5§ 2S o o O ® “ C B Kl CM ii •i CO•J I N O o IA Kl -J O Ui g -J o ^o ^B r Kl :i^ B IA ^ 5 IA sis g = - IA Kl B 0^0 oo IAo I 5 O h- M Ui ^ H CO UJ B UJ VUJ g H UJ U. U. M B O O II 8o 5 h- < flO B O “3 B a Z UJ >- \ B < Ui a Ui a X o 9 Kl CO B O O O S B ^ < Kl X CM P Z O h- coz I o n H So Ui o o •# uX CM <K>»- a o O UJ UJ o CO UJ UJ Si o IA CO M iij o -J IA Q. CM X O § B O Z tc Cl UJ^^ B < ^a u; a X kSS-^ UI B B £ O O - \ B < UJ a UI Q. X SB L €i (i i ;( n , •• • ^ . Cortificate of Survey f Cj • for Jares D. Carson ^ -Icck 7, Sufa Hi LI Revised Hennepin County, Kinnesotp ^//sr/A»c* sne-ucTMKCS / <r- • ! / / / / / / I hereby certify thut this is a true and correct representation of u survey of tht,* boundaries of Lot 3, Plock 7, £a-^a Hill hovirod, Ker.nopln Co., Mnr.., and the location of all existing builriinfs thereon. / / / It does not curport to shov other inproverents arc er.croachrontr?. ScaV;: Date : 1" - 40' 4-r1-cO Iron nvir;<er Gorcor. r. Coffin 6f'?4 wurveyor and I’l'inn.-rr .jorii: L.if:e, Mlrno.sola ' ir #10 r*r% Cortificate oT SuT”voy for Jares D. Carcon of liOt 3, ricck 7, Gapa Hill Rcviced Honnepin Cc\mty, I'.innesotfi pitoPosrie^ lay our m t r^‘ b ^If / / # / / / * 0/ \A / I heroby certify thut this Ic a true ano correct rooresentatlor of a survey o r fithe bouj.darics of uo*. 3, Ploch 7> d /Ea,^! HiLI rt.^vlred, Hoxiiv'pln Co., I-inr.., and iho locatfon cf all oxistir.c Vuilrilnrs theroor, It does not ourpert to shou otlior irp»roverents ard er.crcachr.onte, Gcal Dritn 1” ^ 40’ 4-rl-cC Iron aar/.or Goruor. h . Coffin h-^'U L.%nd Gurvoyor and i l'ir.r.ir oon,' L-iho, ■ilrnusot.i ? I . */ /4 / W-' ^O- Og /*/Z. 7^ 1. 0 r~i Cortificate of Survey for Jares D, Carson of Lot 3, ."Icrk 7, Hill Roviced Hennepin County, Kinnesot.a ^)(/577XJ6» fiA^t>CD\}ei^ //OCiC^A^^ OJITU jPieoPbS^rU / ly (sHAt>cr^ So-X ,4 50O / • <5‘- X ' •i '“S. si£>euj4i,K 1^0 iS^ / / .0.1' •So / : / ^)Ai(m IM>U.Sr^ ifyot / / / / / I hereby certify thc^t this is a true and correct representation of a suiA'oy of thuj bour.darie.s of I'ot, 3, riorV: 7, X Sa^'a Hill iOvlred, Heriiv'pin Cc., Ivir.r.., and the location of all oxir.tii'.f; builPir.rs trereor. It does not ourpert to shov other inproverrents and encroachr.ent;?, 1” - 40 » 4-r 1-SO Iron nvir/.er Gore.or. n. Coffin he,; band .ni:'V<,*yor and blanr.er ./i a j * b I k< i, ! i I r n o:; o 1 a . 6-V.4 cfKti r’" ?p ?> > i-hMiO D*l-'h{ (U^X»1Xh-X /-bwse ~Di 0^0 a'o H- D» ^ o O O M »-• (1) tn O w n H* Di n> < n> H* M* H- rt H* CO < W 3* W rt CD (+ H* ft H* 5 H- 3 H* 3 0» 3 3 M1-/0, / 8 ilg I “•'“5'“ f*" <3 - . - CD vQ H 3 (0 (D 01 s & Diao a s s s n> Ol OJ ^ (U »i .Q H (0 a a H a'd o o m o (T> o o < o o <<»<H- to (D H* (D H> 0» •i p. Cn K>o cn cnoo111rocncn o o o o o o N cn cn cn Hi Hi 3 (D n (D vQ I OQ N (0 0 CO (D (0 9 H* 0 OP to p. 3 p.3 3 rt M» c 1 3 1 0. 3 O(D 5*^ 3 «O O M CO 0 3 P-P CL 0 P c CT P CL C P- rt C a0» rt ►*! p.CL < 3* CL (D CL 0) - rt <(0 P-CD (0 cn <CL p- 3*P-CO CLtf (0 Q)P- 3 »< (0 a CD rt rt p- 0 (0 rt H rt y H-P. 3 C *0 3* rt m 3*(DQi0 vQ cO rt (0 3* P (0P3 CO tj 3*(0 3 ft O 0» OJ 3* O (0 (0 1 (0 0(D P O (0 X 3 P-iQ r^ < c: 3 3 P- C 3 C & 3* 01 P* (i- C 0> t-i Qi 0) 3 rt (T N a O cd .tw 3 ^ fO (D rt3 Lo p. 0 I n> iTi < *o X M 01 u» o »< P* cn n> fC O' £!**< (0 3 *0 0» n- O' CD h P- n> H CD 3 M < U3 P- H» P-0 0 3* 3 C O 0) a rt dlco 0) Oi ca «o O D* C (D O H < H» O (D rt CD tn n 3*0 (D CD (D T3 01 X P* 3 P- C C C (0 CO 3 p* d’ D* ft p. 0) (D 3* 3 P H p»o P 3 P- M 'O 3 ft O d 3* O O |> CD t-n 'O cn O 0) 01 ^ (0 3 *0 (D 0< CD CL a n n> 3 p o o» c M» X* CL p p cn CL rt CD •«. p. p- p, rt n3 to p- P N p- O o CL 3 3 CD 0> D* CD C P‘< . (jj t/1 SI 3 O P-o CO < 3 73 CO ,Q oHzo o a •> 1—•5d — TJ 3* W o (3 CO 0) X o.1. p p p.O > O CL (0 CO O rt w 3 O P-73 X rt < 3 01 (0 «o n P'JQ n > O (0 ir* O O 1—4 c tr*o > • H p- 3* ^O 3 3 0 z n O N CL^s O O 0 o 3 O to 50 (0 < (0 z CO a cn tt awww•-3 V -House (744 +27+25)=796 -Deck =430 -S. Overhang 60 -Sidewalk =180 -Steps# rock w/plastic =300 -Garage =642 -Driveway 1150 -Shed 142 TOTAL ss 3700 im # To: Date: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P, Gaffron, Assistant Pj.anning & Zoning Administrator September 9, 1986 Subject: #1067 Herbert T. Olson, 3640 Bayside Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA, 2-acre implication - Side setback variance to construct a room addition List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D — Survey Exhibit E - Topography and Layout of Nearby Lots Exhibit P - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G - Septic Layout Pertinent Facts: Left Side Setback: Required Proposed Variance Lot Size: 2.0 Acres 30' 19.9' 10.1' or 34% Discussion: The applicants are requesting a side setback variance in order to construct an addition to their existing home. They note that steep grades uphill and downhill from the house, the location of existing trees, drainage, and well location are factors that present hardships resulting in the location of the proposed addition. The addition is for a new kitchen. Note that applicants l^®^^ll©d a new septic system in 1981 which is working well. The impact of the variance on the only property affected, immediately west of the house, appears to be very minimal. The neighboring lot is vacant, and based on the topography the likely placo for a house on it would be centrally located, hence no sigrxficant encroachment on sunlight or air is apparent. Nor would the addition have any effect on the development on the vacant lot. This house was constructed many years prior to the olat of "Riedel's Stubbs Bay Addition- in 1975; which created a conforming setback but did not anticipate future additions. V L.!kr. i, Zoning File #1067 September 9, 1986 Page 2 of 2 No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners as of this writing. Staff Reo indation: Staff recommends approval based on the following findings: 1. Location of the proposed addition to the west side of the existing house as a result of hardships to other locations due to steep slopes, existing trees, drainage, and location of the well. 2. The house was constructed prior to the recent "Riedel's Stubbs Bay Addition" subdivision which did not anticipate a westward expansion of this house, and which created the lot line just west of the house to maintain a 2 acre lot size in the westerly lot.4 4 Mi 2. ^.a r(l^h~L!r7C. yX^-ip^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^/CL-r7 Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Pee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the~Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 34*"fO R oa ’D ______ i X Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) // Please check one - Is the property _ _ abstract or ^ torrens? reqif/r^cT\^rve description to application if not included on APPLICANT Name *7*Phone 6®^ *^*73 Mailing Address SSZ^4 C OWNER Name 7> OCLoO Mailing Address 3CHo A>yX/#6 M _ _ Phone COW4t^WLf» Ma / SS2SL Date Property Acquired 0«*-“r^ I9| C ^ (<3o not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY jf Present Zoning District (month/year) Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; Aop 14^ V v»ig.tT t,i»€ oF VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front jC _ _ Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) .it j*or.Aa_i HARDSHIP ed on DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of fhe names on the above list with no return cddress. 4. Certificate of survey-including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE this application. Please not complete if the above The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that knowl^*dge^"'^^^°*' supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date i-ilzAL The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investio^*- tioii and verification of this request. Date ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meetings are held on thethird Monday of each month. Dbtain Center of fhe ed. ’lease above ed or md/or s that .s/her irther tants, stiga- re the m the mmi m-a atTTBr: % • 220.3B t A ri . {_ tfii'/iw "saSk* oo 98/ 42 98/. 75 v'V /Nr ■] t •'■V.Us. • mm m • m m 74/5 V!FW 2CSK ^ 97?gc 4850 *. 4% 14 im ** >7' 1^'ZZZ £6 -4 L<i'lZl ^ I If I I £*7 Its '^^69*793 I*liv^ !. j !m m 0...1**. Ig, .c*^ ^..■*•*-i s I i I j,5) 1 a .V 7T. I... .(i!'' i .V}.I. C‘''\.i. L_'i/5!i'j_^.'ifi^. I . 6*>) ■ (}<■) ; ftVVj \K' f 775T ?<&8g: «f£32C^ ik'j-''* *r. /OCfe-V •< V us itJtf (AtrtQt Phvfo ) Of AtwM! yxAJkjD iy o>fCh IW^ ■U’l} i m W *» *n ••• ’♦ i?.l2i i M‘» \ 1 Ci*v?r'\V ;;^t\-‘ 'o>ci"- ■iT, \ dlY'L^,\V6 t • ■*'• •! • r ^cfy too »^r» jli> m 4 o to ^ Ma • luSi § UJ r lU I t; ILI H < O u r- < CO c (( 1ex A/, c tu^ u. ^ o S S 0 o 10 QC 44 -J M l&l Z O O Ul to M 10 Z CM 10 <1 >• o n -« CO H 4« o CK 10 to 10 10 lUoM 10 I 10 a oc O UJ Ul sr CO CD CO □ UJ UJ %o to 5 to CM I N O QC I 10 II ^iis^ 10 tu lU UJ q: o h- o U U €0 M M 10 to s to CM IN UJs 10 >- < CO t- H UJ Of §o QC t- UJ UloM lO 10o o «} CD to to o Ul |^<D u S § H 10 O oco oc o q : o S = S!5 aSS!^m- o o t» 44 10 CM z to UJ CM Ul I N M 44 UJ t- t- 55 c^ lOto 10 10 ►- 10 ^ OQ CD UJ Ul 10 o o CM to o g&C UJ UJ M M > > to M 3a CL to S § U) § CM Ul < g I N M ^ Ul o o o to too S CD 1“ UJoa o Ul O Ul M33 M CL Ul UJ to CM I tv I lO o to CL < to r CD to Ul 2 to CM I lO o to CM I lO o CO to CO o o to o o p < CO •J sag< a c>Ulto10li. !$; •-4 o to 10 to o stoo10o to to t-t-«0 O tolO44 10 cr < 10 §g 10 10 •jo o o CL •4 H K UJ oM to I- H tt a UJ Ul CO CO tt CL Ul Ul Z X < CD o o ^ z M> O to mJ ■e? -..f V rt CM Ul Ul <to to u.•>«u.O «J CM M nOtooMo ^10 o X 10tooZM O to o to to & Z 49 O to to «•M < toCMz o %M z z o •J .Jo o 44 I- H Ulo M lO t- t- a X Ul UJ CO (O ft X UJ Ul X X < CO UJ < o<r lO K r ^ a CL Ul si g tt o UJ o < w ill W £ < ^ iU a r QL UJ |4 ^Si CL O S5 >• N. 52 C 4 €1 C r~ 1-1 i. rr "i 0Plat of for Harbert of lot 1| Block 1, Rladal's Stubbs Bay Addition Hsnnepln Coimty, Minnsaota CiLCKN Co.hio. S4 ^ f J <s s2v> Csrtificats of Sutt^: of thlrsSd^'lf tot Xoctlon of .U oxl.ttog bill«n« ‘xd th. or cnc«,.eh««a. ” * “JT* ^ P“rp^to SealsI Oats t o t 1" « 60* 9-13-76 Iron marksr Gordon R. Coffin Rs^ land Sui^syor and Plannsr Long LalM| Minnesota • • 4 'k i imi i- Art 1 ) zo H 3 3 *0 % u 0) > oo o *o •H V4 ^ <0 < x: (U CT» flj 4J c 01 o 0)a *o 0) V) o (U > o ua'o o u u Id Qt x: o 0) O D'«H Id •p X. c 01 ^ u < >4 •!• 0) Q »a 0) (0 o 0) > oua*o o u ‘4 Ida jz <Dc o N c •H Mao u:X u (O «c u n ti] sag •J « N •2. 4-4 (0 I O .1 in 4o in CN % O 4-t U) r< 0 in CN 1 in cN o fO •iR < 4-1 0) o X o 0 o X Xa•HOC X O 0 0 *0 0 4;CO o •H |4 M w - u X 0 0 a 0 Q wx a'-'a <•a 0 oz >4 4-4 CMgCP 0 0)CO inaC > 0o•HOC X 0 0 0 »0 N !> •H H •0 X 0 c (T a X -H bO w a CP 0 4-1 4-1 4-j c 0 0 cn in in •H l4 C X 0 0 n0 N •H X Q b X 0 C a •H >• j~ 'j• < •ii f«« U) O O in Io in CN mro 4-4 (0 \o 4-4 (0 4^ (0 'Sl. ooo Ioo in w c 0 •H 4J U 01 M •H Q T3 C Id r4 0) 1-4 X3 Id •a f-4 •H 3 J3 >» Wi *0 04 O 0)cn Id 4J o o 04 0)u Id 3 cr (0 r4 •d 4J o 0)x: 4J (0 0) 'O 3 r4 O c •H I (A rH CO 0) T3 •H 0) O O f-4 0)c • >1*H 0X3 Idc c O >1 o M iH H a-u •O *H -H - ® 4-» -O (0 •H •-4 >a IH 3 Id O-rt e 0) o TJ *0 • T3 0) a c (0 « ■ Id o 10 a <H « <|o ox u o *t c Cuu -H C -4 CP-H U f-i c X 0) Id •H 4J X 4J -H g 0) (0^33 •H C »H X • a V « 0) UX H «H « X 0) O 04 > M >1 O 0) 3 X U CP • *0 Id X|H X • Id O 3 C X O O-H 04 -H tJi > U C 0) H 0) -H M «X 4J Id a e 3 e 3 tr-H c (0 I C 0) 0) *HX 0) X « X X X H X 0) 0) U*0 (0 0) V-H O •o X > Td 3 X -H O «-4 O *0 r4 0 o C TJ I C •H C « 0) 1 CP I Id O 0) X 0) c • c c: > 0) o« u N a 0) (0 •H X 0) n cO O N so N cc -H H a o c •r4 •H 0» •H H Id X 0) <H 0) U ® > > >0) o o > o o o >0) o ® o o u o a*0 M T> *0 *0 0 (0 H tr H H H T) Id Id Id Id H 'O0} £c sc sc * sc Id 0) X • U X ^ tPX tp >1 tPTJ 0 *0 o C fZtOCO>Q)'Or-i •HC**45-HOTOW0rH x-Hx«xouo^id (0 X (0 > 10 a'o a o •HX*H*H*HO H 0*H 0 X*HXHXH0Mr-lXOO4X M^M03uaxa<xx o o u 0 >oo oo >i»0X (u 0 m r4 >» U ro XQ.0 I ’H pq •P 0) r* c ^3 o 0 to Id 0 H oc H Id > oB X 0u 0 G £ N X X 0 C'Om Cox 0 0 X <|X oc c 0e c •H 0 Xtn u 0 >4u 3oco c •H CPc •H u 0 Xe 3 m 0 0 U X^ a. C 0 0 3 0 Q X U tP*H o c c X *H « • C >1^3 0 U O r4 0 X N r4 W X c: 0 E 0 H >1 3 X 0 X »H X c Qio X u u C 0 H X c0 o 0 oCP 0 T3 3 X »H o X C C 3 > 0 o U X U iO 0a 3 o c •H u 0 0oc >1 u 0 <0 V) O 0a u O 0 H Ca 0 u X 0 > cu X oc 0 T3 •H u H 0 0 X X f-i 0 0 CP o C H •H X0 •O 0 >1 C -H •H X -H »0 > X 0 TJ •H a X 0 T3 X X •H c O 0 I e X I 3 X X r4 o 0 o CP 0 o 0 CP 0o c 0 •H H 0 > 0 0 0c o N X 0 c 0 0 0 0 X TJ H o 0 C X -H X X -H 0o H 0a X o 0 >oo»o c 0 o 0 0 a X •H 0 rH 0 *H IPX H 0 X E ’H c 0o H 0 H 0 >ou 0a 0 c H 0 0 oa*o u 0 0 ax X X l4 CP 0 0 c > 0 H o 3X0 o 0 *0 0 •H •o H H X 0 0 X n u X u a f h a 4 To XI :* From: Date: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 10, 1986 Subject: #1068 Dr. Glen Nelson, 500 Tonkawa Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lB, 1-acre sewered Application - Variance to allow guest apartment within principal structure. Lot Area - 3.66 Acres List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Pertinent Facts: Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey/Site Plan Structure Layout Current structural additions me^t all setback requirements. - Well is going to be moved to accoiunodate addition. Northwesterly wing is to contain kitchen/bath/living room/bedroom - connected to main house only through g rage, has its own separate outside entrance - proposed only for guest apartment use, no rental use intended — proposed to do double duty as a "staging” area for catered affairs, etc. - Permits have been issued for proposed additions, except kitchen installation pending this application. Discussion: The Nelsons are requesting a variance to allow a second dwelling unit to be constructed onto their existing home. The intent is to provide a relatively private area for their guests, as well as create a "staging" area for entertaining. The edition could also be used as a caretaker apartment. It is clearly a separate unit as one must traverse the garage before entering the main house. - -- k4< Zoning File #1068 September 10, 1986 Page 2 of 2 This does not fall into the category of a guest "house” because it is attached, hence staff feels the Guest House Conditional Use Permit Code Section is not pertinent. This would fall under the "Temporary Two-Family Housing" Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A)7. Because this is a variance, the City can place whatever conditions are necessary on any approval, in order to ensure that single family residences do not become duplexes. Note that the proposed layout does not meet the criteria for a main access entryway within the principal dwelling, which the Council has generally held to in similar applications. This should be an item for discussion. Staff Reccxnmendtion: Staff would recommend approval of temporary "two-family dwelling" status for the Nelson residence under the following conditions: 1. The second dwelling unit is allowed as a guest apartment only, to be used only for relatives and non-paying guests of the current property owners. The unit may not be rented out. 2. The two-family dwelling or guest-apartment use shall cease at such time the applicants no longer own the property. Any subsequent property owner must re-apply for a two-dwelling unit use. Note that staff expects to bring forth a proposed code amendment in October creating copropriate standards for this type of guest apartment. t/So- 6cl< . 7i/U ■y ^l- '^'■■^ /. / I f «-.J,t''f^-ir*^' *) oT" :i ?"• K ' Acpi'ic^ip^ Renewal Variance ree •*0“* 4 r * ^ ij* \ fiA»C“ ORONQ - VARIANCE APPLICATION3 50.00^$50.00 per each additional variance) 00 (hd^change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 'Ih » <^ST* Ul'l'l » IZ* OQOl Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone ____________ ________ Mailing Address l^ii av€-. Sg. Witig- 3ofe MPcS. OWNER Name 1>2.Phone T0N)MfVA//V , \yOK(y LAt^ M^J. Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.4i PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District /• ^ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _/ Residential \ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; USgr A /fp APC?\TtQN/ A SgPAni^Arg- WCtLtrsI^ UN»T MPT "fl> ftg- ^r-JTeO CHAT__________ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other ^i~ru;> j f t o ^ HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6? REQUIRED SUBMITTALS !•/ Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address.(P Certificate^ of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember your variance application is information has not been included. this application. Please not complete if the above APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council meinb^s for p^urposes of investiga tion and verification of this requesty^ Owner's Signature '<7 Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. into in ^ M M • lUo o If) M H g !n M I cn DCUJ d:Uiao K Ha i&jao CO N lU < §H < CD < inKl in in _ _ in in o Kl < iJ «l *x . I -J VC I in in in (0 in § II M M H isis o z CD in lii<0 o -j a to o CD o \ 0 o . a -J CM <to < H a Hi to M CM ^ Ul U 1 S CDN 6 < 2•-« H CD M 3 I U Oin lAj o e zM Ui _ ? a CD O o o < to o Hi CD inin *1 H in in in^ in SloQ Z HI ^ < >- N 3 ^ a < Hi a lAir-% < CD O h- CM to to in in to CM I I in §iin in o •J “i a cn in o -J M M H H t- CDggsiu u m -i o a o a o o o a u CM to < UJ,^ia CM ^ > N O Hi ^ t- in a M X cn < lii t- M Z N < ^ a in in z in m o I in O M CM r in HI zoin ^ a 10 o a < CM ^ o a u in inrv CM az Hia r o < a O Z Hi < >• a < a HI a o z Xsis aoo N HI Z z 4 C i f% t < a s *3 Z HJt S t* ^ < o a oX M HI UJP H >15 “ M HI ^ H cn Hi a HJ z V Hi a a M a o o 3*9 i4f; V \ \ ^*?d? 'Sssio^ ^ ___i±'.o r *,' i>K I e^7. y/AuU'* •fe tfZCfi. '“■T ,*et95.*’^ 0W5*- -.4.ru. -New U:<^Tior( •ex.vT wc» wN j------ HT" r E K ” * .4f+ -h“ ~O I-----------------1----------: _ Naw wo Zoc^ N _ a^iVT. A'A;.U- rMTCH ;VAVW ^ c e?eA,v\ r-t/ xj*-' r*rv', ----^••9tfANT. L. --' u 4- - £»'*', <!,'. A • A-,-jt._|r.------------'’-:r. <" ^ 'til»%\0 UHTCU §e.A,v!& V «/iwV I' ■ bfTT ^VfcW ■ i ^ te'N S AA\ ' UN--u^ V/i-*u e^T. t Picup 'Ki^'T\\ u>irA”(i>*J ,-wt,»v-op cx'5'rJ^ ■ __j BEDROOM ^^DOWs; FIRE EXIT REQUIRED, 20” MIN. CLEAR WIDTH 24” MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT ,r< 5.7 SQ. FT. MIN. OPENING ■ 48” MAX. SILL HEIGHT ST^fVlSpg: I run *"**^^^* V^fr^~4~ •>; !!^n« t „ liiii ill" f*"”'«te£ TFCJvu TVP, a “ WAU- -' ‘ “TYPIC^AU 3^” K |^*‘ Pre N^T6*FiuC* V Pnr*^ rf- vs •. 5v» ,*. H/ ^ruT V* • U'^TCU s L C? W C 1 J To: Date: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 12, 1986 Subject: #1069 Jim Williams, 2725 Ethel Avenue Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lc Application ~ Sxde setback for 2nd story on house, hardcover variances for deck and driveway. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B -* Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Pertinent Facts: Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Hardcover Conditions Approved by Staff For Garage Permit Final Site Plan Proposed, Final Proposed Hardcover Calculations Building Plans Side setback required: 10* Side setback existing: 4.2*; Variance = 5.8* or 58% Applicant requests variance to add 2nd story on existing house — no additional lateral encroachment. Existing hardcover prior to garage construction: 36.4% Permit for garage issued subject to relocating to position shown in Exhibit E, with driveway narrowed to 10', for final hardcover of 30% (30% allowed in this 250-500' zone). Request is to add 1st floor deck to front of house, and keep the driveway as shown on Exhibit E. Final hardcover proposed; 38.9% X, **,: i * f :es he Zoning File #1069 September 12, 1986 Page 2 Discussion: The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to add a 2nd story to his house, because the existing house is 4.2* from the side lot line. This house is generally down hill from the affected residence to the north, and that residence is 43* from the lot Him on a double lot, hence little impact on light, air or open space is anticipated. The affected neighbor has not commented on the proposal. The second request is to allow 38.9% hardcover where only 30% would normally be allowed. The applicant agreed to reduce his driveway hardcover to a width of 10* in order to meet the 30% standard to obtain a building permit for the new garage under construction. However, he feels that the 10* width and the narrow tapered 16* to 10* front of the garage will cause him some problems with access to the garage. Staff agrees that in the rear yard near the garage, some extra width would be preferable. The overall width to that point need not be over 12*, so the 16* wide portion next to the house, could be reduced to 12* for an 80 s.f. reduction from the final proposal. The front deck of 6 x 14* plus stairs will serve the front door and does not encroach on any setbacks. Drainage from the property is generally to the south and probably travels 800-1000* before entering the lake, which might be a justification in itself to consider that the property should be allowed up to 35% hardcover. Drainage from this lot directly to adjacent lot to the south has not been brought up as a problem, and presumably can be handled by a swale along the driveway if it ever becomes a problem. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the 2nd story addition variance, based on findings that the lot size does not allow for any reasonable lateral expansion of the existing house, and finding that the existing house is 4.2* from the lot line but upward expansion will have little impact on the affected neighbor*s light, air or open space. Staff recommends partial approval of the hardcover variance for deck and driveway, finding that the general drainage pattern away from the lake decreases the impact of drainage from this property, and finding that the expanded garage apron requested is reasonable for useful access to the garage. A reduction of driveway width to 12* results in an 80 s.f. reduction or final hardcover of 2,839 s.f. (37.9%). A reduction of the driveway to 10* until the rear line of the house would result in a final hardcover of 2,715 s.f. or 36.2%. ^ raco, o o CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ''''■ Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the'^Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address EVweL /Vue Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^ ^/ OO Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT ^ I Name CT*^Phone H 7 \ ^ ^00*7 Mailing Address Zl EWvL OWNER Name VVVV\fe Phone S Mailing Address S h»w\^ Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) Tdo notj also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property / /o Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request, in detail; LD r>t.ck f^DD(h^r)_ _ _ _ f - - VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances (_ _ _ Other SBCoii\/h SfartA/ r!lr)U. Front ^_ Hardcover Side ^ Rear) cr^p,c.e HARDSHIP al tck Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; Lo^ KiM.co..^To via?; cor>*»»vy< Of <>; to tlAuE l*Q Ct O' uR | :r>; TT, /, '0/ i r (> ,T q C’f t ^ ****"—*"***^***^^** — — — — — —^ — — — «1» —■» — — — mL mm, — — — i— — — —. nrr — ^ — DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS 5-a V Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zonin.^ Code Regurrements; \4.c\(LO f co>fCv ( Cifv v>p »r> j: c t>? i4;a-?r. ('ovt c.. r^r.\\jc L }r>^,\-r ^/h-«Wp uuTh.^j tiDP c <v^v) v\qW» c.C'^- t r rvyr>. ff Co jjt^ C>h>l^v UA<; v/f-f ._______ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Ci^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. ([?)j Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. (3^ Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. '■ /Jx,.Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. 10 K> M O. lUo r-I UJ S CO 0>o UJ < O 5a 5H C ■Mlc^ Kl lO lU lU iO lO O o > CM U 5 lU < J CO tt Qf^< 3 o z ^ U tt U £ CO I -J -i U H CM O UJ UJ <I5iis2 <0 Kl UJ UJ <ro o 3 z to 3 ^ 3 M (O ^ O M CM a to o CM u a I CO f^ CO >• to O H O M < 'O o ^ oc o o t- O X M^ o CM O. CO M so 3 UJ »J to o CM U o t CO CO CJ X ^ to O H- O M & *M O' to in iO §5 “S^ N <0 V Mi 3 3 C O O < 3 O O Z Ui < < >• N 3 O H - CJ I-u UJ CM < 3 3 < to .1 CM UJ •M UI <^ < <c to •J *j in u -I UJ m M M >a a < •-4 UJ UJ o CM 10 UJ lU < iO M o >- CO CM to o II2 < < •J CM 3 oo UI CM < to -J UJ UJ CM UJ 3 3 .if 5§ ^ UJ -1 -> Io CM 3 3 O O CO ^ M M mC CO CM 3 3 to O CJ u Ss o ^ >- 3oo ao 111 £ < 3 X Ui >• 3 <UI 3 r X:c < O H 3o 9 ^3 y € # €t UJ 3 M O 3 o 3 CM •« CO CM O to o CD O Z Z Z 3M UI UI ^ O CO CO t- ^ CM 3 Z Z Z (^ UJ UJ M to to O h- H O lO CM U CO CO 3 iO I to M M N < 3 3 O •M O X X UV 5 o ^ ^ o 10 UJ UJ o z -J -J m o CO CM < < 3 to O O O CM o _ o C^ 3 LU 3 M 3 o o CM UJ > < to ^ CM iU •M UI CM 10 ou M ^ LU £ U > 3 M < O CO . 3 UI U 3 3 3 ° 10 5;^ X CM CM O*to inin o t- O z M ^ O CM 3 Z Z 3 3 lO to >• 5 £ too 3 to O CM U I CO h- < •M O 3 3 > I O CM O inn* CO CMto o 3 3 3 3 CO CO M M 3 3 S5 3 Z O M to O if\ 3 in < < o U _ 3 L J < < O O o Z 10 oo* 3 CM O in CO 3 •-4 •>4 o o o O .^4 O U 1-4o3 O'3 to Oto^ > to to to ^ > 3 3 < to in 3 < £ £ in 3 < 3 3 u in 3 _ <<33 3 3 in to 3 M M > *to -J < < > CM 3 3 I X -JP M 3 -i <•J M I O CM LO CO CM 3 £ CO CM < to O 1 CO 3 5 •0 -I 3 f 3 CM 3 rif •-4 3 3 O 3 O < t- LO CMrs. CM LO 2 >- 3 I O CM %o < r- CO CO CJ 3 to o to ^ 3 S 3 S < < LO N LO >• D N < 3 CM 3 3 O O < 3 £<Z 3 O 3 3 3 3 fc 3 Q 3 a 3 < >- N < 3 3 £ X «C< zt- H 3 3 ^ > CM < to 3 CM 3 rif •-4 3 3 U t 3 to I CM O CJ 1^as U > 10•d >- <c in o . 3 -> 3 Z 3 3 3 3 Z Z O z z X CM oo o 3 -7 -> CM o I CO fs. < ^ u Io 3 O o CO 3 to o 3 O 3 3 Ou to t- z H •8 > 3 oS O >-<c 3 X 3a 3 3 £ O < 3 0 O Z 3 < < >- N 3 < 3 3 Ui 3 £ 0* •>4 oo 0 •J HOH o 3 3 3 o t* O Z •-4 in ^^ t- O 3 O *-4 M o 3 Z Z c> ^ O o to <•>00 to 3 3 3 in 3 < in 3 in to O in K to -J S ®3 in > 3 U 3 3 <M 3 2 s 4.- tM M M C X i o o 3 ^ > 3 to -J 3 3 £ I Z 3 H 3 3 D < ^ to 3 in M 3 in I ^ t- < O CO 3 h- 3 *0 <t < C^ M> *8 CO 3 X M> < to O 3 P 3 Z 3 3 £ O < O Z < 3 UJ u 3 3 O 3 < >- \ < 3 3 r X <^ z t L j. CITY OF ORONO jdS. SITE PLAN__ GRADING PLAN □ APPROVED JSrAPPROVaO V^!7H,R£ViSIONS □ OISAPPRQVEDy/ BY _________ DATE_, peor/o-r BLt>C. peyti^ir /;r4R. FOB: CERTIFICATE Qf SURVEY FotL. G.tofl6E I Je/)/Z.oirhJ OLD C'TrAGP '^Locf^ 'pflirio^^ flfiCr.OuJ ^ Hoose* ^ " f(toA^ShEf 2^ fc^yWii,^ $<r i:>«iv 0 DtnotM iron fnonunwm o OanotM effwt Mkt a 000.0 Oonotn talMino olov. 1 000.0 i Oanotn Propoitd tl*v. ■ ■ ■ O*noi«* Mrftca dralniga Propond garagt floor tltv.« Propond lowim floor •tty, • Propond top of fourtditlon titv. BENCH MABK: DEMARS • GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS. INC. 3030 Harbor Lana No. P'ymoulh MN 55441 Phona; (ei2)SS»«000 teriify that Ihii it a true and corract rrprtMntation ol a iwrvev of tha boundarlti of tha above >tcribed lar>d and ol the location of alt boildinm •f any. ihereoiM and all vii Na ancroachmenii, il any. from or on ta<d land. Ai turv»v»d/y me thii^ yf7 iAm<f g| _ ig Minn. Raj. No.9a<£^ Flit No. Book - Page 1 W- llipj , d i, A \:,*.- i ■'lii 'm .t t ^ .35 ! • — ' IP"/ ^fla.i> C^yVtifZ^. ^^EgV/trv'> •' 2^i2-5i^ S^TTl'^t /t>r- ,4^e-'» - S'O’?^''•3^' = *7S^O s:C. •Zisrr-^Ji^K-5- (^/JiO'r^T j:;>/,?4-/AJ<-<s,o /^A-V74 ! ^ fin/uCt^ /C=raCi/^ 5Z»V«®C>* =: 3>Ci^o (^/=^ '^J'Crps = 2 2.SO 2.*5" . . ir // ^ (X^A-^ C^Oe:2_ /Vousg: (<2.0, V ^ 3 2-sr") - 663 plDi>T STTfpS /V'^5'0 ' “S-O r.C, P£>Ai-|^CjC { /C> ' >" t-/ ' ^ " Vo ,5-6 . ______ £,Coc^ ^>>er70 (^4,' X^’') - Vfe rC.C«CHU>V^) / , • '!-v p /niJyz^o.’X) - 2S>^ 7jo>t2H _____SL^(^l<^x 2^ ^ ‘2'^ :?A. __ ........ <;^,^Aa?Z_ l^(?UvW .................... ....... =-/4/S"s.C. _ lc,«/)teTo X *■ 0*o+-26»o a /ofco ,;C. ~ i I JpA^fOS (dS^ A^x> f r70A-*^ft-. Cou ............C>P^JlMf^ /OXZ-O (oir/ (^3X^0^ ' O " Z^O >«« VV6> -h z->%<^--mA %i .- flAit^ fi€viset> f^eaSA^t— Fott. &MA.&S: /OeTS^AMT l*w**s<? 66 S x.S. ftAfftvsrt^ Zo t.Si. fenA.Ft**4A Vp » ^ • C^4A^ H^O . P<^Ufev»oY I qU> tS FOR:CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY \ % / 7^. \ "-25- N .V ?*Q. /JC'^ C C^A/i-'T, J ■// A-^ /6 / \ SITT? PU^j fiUyPoSArL — S:rt>it*f - 4^^ fvJoiuT^DCC^ i:)/2.i U<5W .^::5 » \ i.V (o i'i)‘ roiS ITEM MS BEEN MICROFIIMED C /?//=» 7VO/V K y-v>'^y<sy^^ I ~l Denotes iron monument Denotes offset stake Denotes existing eiev. Denotes Proposed elev. Denotes surface drainage Proposed garage floor elev. Proposed lowest floor elev. Proposed top of foundation elev. SENCH MARK: DEMARS - GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth MN 55441 Phone: <612) 559-0908 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the abo /? described land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereor}) and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land! As surveyed/Ty me thiy^i ^ /day of ________ 19 7^. r/<A /Ut- v/ Minn. Reg. No. File No. Book - Page Scale' • • *««», ♦ • • • • I I t « :\AJA*f f 11 K' ii. ' i II I ; f-/f0A^ fcsaO fM-^~b>CoUe(3-. i. f ' ; st ! ‘ I * |l’, pi^5»^oT Df'c (;^. 4- STtvi * ?4> j:X. fZc^^ 'PiP/s^-^^ypffcK. : "2, 7X2.0 Vo sf. Df? I i/fefiA/{^/ 2-y 7 t) -/ x2o;> ■ZA}^ 2.^^'^/ ~}^o - 33,9 X ii ,, -t»-A¥T • ■ S\. A \ ‘i i ■ • ;i| *i ■ ' ^ - • : 4Y <• ^•^ ■ 'r ■ ■M - i »*-.4*.-,^V •j» 3'’: ■• .r. •♦-> ^f4-' .S ■ ile No. k-Page Sc«lc * I f 1 X. I* X' \s^ rP. \xfft >5 ij- 0c i'* •V*\a\m I To: From: Date: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 12, 1986 Subject: #1070 Richard Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB Application - Side setback variance to construct attached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Pertinent Facts: Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Site Plan Survey Enlarged, With Details The Building Inspector has given his opinion that this garage, to be connected to the residence at a point by a concrete block wall, is considered as an attached garage. - Side setback required: 30* - Side setback proposed: 0-2* (Slab not survoycJ, no dimension indicating skewness of house on lot. Slab might be over the line, for all we know.) - 24'x24* Concrete slab, 9*6"x24* apron were poured without permits, applicant asked inspector to come out to review burning permit, construction without permit was noted and stopped at that time. - Concrete block you see on the slab is not mortared and is being stored until such time construction continues. . . Discussion: The applicant is requesting a side setback variance ’o construct an attached 24*x 24* mansonry garage. He commenced construction without permits, claims he wasn*t aware he needed one. Then, when staff discovered the slab, applicant researched and found his survey showed the lot line extremely close to rear of slab. Zoning File #1070 September 12, 1986 Page 2 Note that if the slab is more than 2' from the lot line, as a slab only it is a non-encroachment, but is considered a structure requiring a permit. If a garage is built on it, it is definitely an encroachment into the side yard setback, needing a variance. Applicant claims that this is the only feasible site for a garage, given the topography and septic location, unless major amounts of fill and grading are done. The septic tank certainly does impact the location to a degree, and any work past the existing 5' drop-off will likely affect the drainfield. However, considering the extent of work done to create a flat parking area with poured concrete all along the 5-foot drop-off and a concrete ramp to the lower level, it seems to me that better planning could have allowed the garage to be placed directly south of the house with no encroachment on the setbacks, but this would have eliminated the use of the single existing tuckunder garage. The neighboring property owner, Bruce Dayton, has written a note of approval of the garage location. Staff remains unconvinced of the actual lot line location behind the garage. Drainage from the property is generally to the east and south at the garage location. It appears that the swale between the properties is about 10' into Dayton's lot. The additional run-off onto Dayton's lot as a result of the garage is minor, and gutters along the rear of the garage would require the added run-off to virtually none. Staff Recoimnendation: Given the site conditions prior to the slab construction, staff feels that there are better alternatives for a garage on this site, but none which still allow ready access to the existing garage. With the extensive site work recently done (i.e. concrete slabs next to the 5' drop-off), it seems that a 24'x24' garage could be placed directly south of the house, opening to the west. Please view the garage site if possible. Do you find any justification for granting the side setback variance for the garage on the existing slab? If you do approve this, staff would recommend an updated survey prior to construction, showing the actual lot line and verifying the setback to the slab. / »irC• / rJr, - - /r",^...-_ ''‘’i •">■-•■'- ^>-' (s■ ' ■■ if. j ■ '. ;.j; ' CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ' / S'7 ^ N ^ /^o,oo (h Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address CSIcA Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 3-5 ~ I I 8 A-j - Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Cf ^ ' Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name CircV WvY^e,V\art 4^79' Phone 4* ”7 3 '•S O ^ Mailing Address ^33 ~ Lono SA. LOcx>y A^vv.5^:^/ ---------------------------------------------------->-*-----------------------------i-------1------------------ OWNER Name i?L.lna fi 1 y\ e V\a r ^Phone 473-5<f:>3S' Mailing Address Lor^ k? fe. Date Property Acquired '7 j\^7 2^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (^o no^l) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property RR- \e> ^^esidentia^ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 4-OCO~ Describe request in detail: 3r\e 4r> VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover ^ Side Rear) L i HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting frt^. ;>trict enforcement of zoning regulations /<, cIc. K, , . - - - - - - --- -U.=S_ _ _ _ _ _- r ^ . Alltf —ruu^ p<7^^-^i'"h^ Cj^/p Ay~ i/t<o /< ■ / ■( i(c<> DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: ~rW_ crw^tU^? loHr-. ^M jul 4g-.P<^/.-«rAk^ -4^X-0 Vot~. 1 r\\^ ^ ^ i -j,£ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2, Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 2;: A ^ Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4.. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this reouest.non ana veriticatipn or this request. Owner's Signature c.Cfcx^ cO TSx_ _ _ _ _ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. ■ f h-^ 35- t- / / ,<05 /> {:») 4-«V. t /6 5<^ V 3 >1 eio OOC UO DOC NO mOSft« 825 0'"' .4»al4S Jl ^ 14 ion: n|4T^ l3 fl! NIlV 111117^ <»>M M R .-f, 4 jf' £ifS %V)s V. -1U V ^ l^e \ • Q 2 > < -J \ V_ t j if:a j' . <(7*1ikVi • ^ ► A ll O O * O ' K ^ **o 2C L. M^ C -orv^ ^ S': 4ri M tL g Q. UJ tt UJi tn (M o UJ H <o §u UJ -j in I o >• __ CO ^ < o o e>z •M o O U -i I in in B«3< lii cna u cn _ Z3 M o CO o o: ^ in o CO CO o q: ^ UJ o ^ a 9 S z m o o CVJ H h- • p >• >• o o o 0: CM UJ o h- ^ z in UJ in u Iinm (D (D O UJ lU cn Si CO o q: q: m o p p CVJ in CM *J OL^ z z ^tss < CM O i o o o o o o > O -J p < H UJ m < CM N I >- to < ^ Z It: tt -1 n p I inm o c^ p o in o in in q: < UJ ^ H ^ S IM Z o o >• £ p p < i;2g u. u.H _ < Z Z N X X o >- o o < “> “> 3 o 0 - >- p -J < <^ o o o o: UJ UJu CM O<rinm in CM I p p PI in m in UJ UJ p u u p p p o q: CL m o p p tn Si CM P CM -M Q.^ r I in in CM o CL CM UJ o o < o «J |5 UJ o CL O OC m4 O^ z mS CM iSp^ o H H ^ CL CL UJ O < < :iL mz z < PUJ UJ -J p Z ZM M O CL CL Z O Z 10 O -J £ •-« UJ o o o ou CM m CM I p iD 6 C^ -I P P 1“ h- O ►- h- -i P D O P P P P P o a o o - O U 2§ o Z a o uz • o < Xu h- <: p < o h- CM S3 zo pz <z p CM P CM I P O O Oz < Q o z c^ p p o - >• O CL CL P CL CL CM O UJ P o §i O Mz zr oz < H4 H -J < NlO >- O - \ a < UJ < X a - \ a - \ a < Ulua iij CL X a p a n a p a X a p CL x:o z X -i CL :c < X O Z X •'C IL li -c z o X<CL Tc < z CL :< *< zpCL U H IL U 1-IL O H iL a P O h- CL P O lU o >-< u. ^ ‘"51 lU p UJ p a p o H Z M < O CL X M UJP H Z < Z >- I- UJ U. Z X Z M UJ ^ H P UJ CL P X >- UJ (L I- X U CL lU LL U. M CL O O Zo #i p I c ; ^ r h’i. >> it ^ ■ [ ii 990 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-7979 August 15, 1986 #1070 Mr. Richard Rinehart 985 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Dick: You have informed me that the garage which you have constructed is less than 10 feet from my property line and hence requires a variance. I willingly grant my approval of this variance, but this agreement between us applies to your new garage structure only. With best regards, 4'ruce B. Dayton .<............................ Vr ... •m %Jy ’ T • • 4 i • •6 J.v •//.•»’ -L ^ i t/ Z/4A'£’ /?0/4^ C.r';/<*r//v«' cf trjiirfI A Plat of Survey for Rlrh/ird C, Rinehart _in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35-HP-23 Hennepin County, Minnesota \ \ \ \ I V 90' /->tWr ifn* 9.* i'as* !C of $a '/k ef jy-z/’i Certificate of Survey: 1 hcreb>* certify that this is q true and correct representation of a surv’ey of the boiUKiariec of t!ie West 90 feet of that part cf the ?>iat half of the Southeast quarter cf Section 3 ‘jf Townrhip 118, Runpe 23, Hennepin Co’.inty, Minnesota, Ivinq North of Hirhway 12, KXCSPT read, and of the location of all buildings theireon, and all visible encroach ments, if any, except lino fences, from or on said land. This survey is made only in c(3nnection with a nortfafe loan now belnf placed cn the property; and no liability is assumed except to the holder cf such nortref^c or any other interest ac quired by reason of such mortrar'c. It is understood and arrood no monu ments have boon placed for the pur pose cf cstablinhlnr lot liner, or bou'ndnry corners. Ko attemot was made to lroat»^ a temtorarv portable nhoi now Ico'ited on the ; ror>erty. Gordon .H. Coffin Re^^',^^C. 60^4 Iw\nd Surveyor and Plannor Lonj: Lake, Minnesota Scale; 1" = 50» Date : 6-29-72 J 1 linjUi c I 1 r• 9o:o' I 1 I 1 I <: A Sire PiAA» eA/£.A«e&^ • • • • • I I^S't /^(Z6X)U)S /ofctCAT^ ^>((St7/og, 0<eAfAJA<?^ • • • • • • •pT » I /8./' 1/ 1 I ( 41 t %I ¥5;’Cort I true \a su S West il I VO "half g Socti J* Henn ^ Nort and ther V 90' I • • • • • • • V ^^Vt/ //);i* of STasf 'f of - ^ — W —^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Si-. 'A cf SecZ/or, JS'V/J ^S ment fron i I iriort the assiE To:Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardsour City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Pron:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:September 9, 1986 Subject: #1071 Colin Kelly & Lona Shaughnessy, (Lot 2r Block 1 Kelley Green) - Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IB, 2-acre Application - Front and rear setback variances to construct a new residence* List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Neighboring Residence Layout Pertinent Facts: Lot width; 720* Lot Depth; 144' Front Setback - Required; Proposed: Variance; Rear Setback - Required; Proposed; Variance; 50' 37.3' 12.7' or 25% 50' 33 q • leil' or 32% Discussion: Applicants request front and rear setback variances to construct a residence on this long but relatively narrow lot created as part of Kelley Green in 1978* Because the usable lot depth after required 50' front and rear setbacks is only 44*, the shape of the lot is a hardship in that it leaves little flexibility in designing the house to fit the landscape. Note that a new house is expected to be started soon on the opposite lot south of the cul-de-sac. The topography of the site seems to suggest that the proposed house and drainfield are located in the most logical site on the lot. However, this does place the house directly south of the Heinz Otto residence (which accesses off Watertown Road). Staff has received no comments from Mr. Otto as of this writing. Zoning File #1071 September 9, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Given that a side setback standard of 30* is required in the RR- IB district to provide open space and maintenance of a rural character# it follows that a new residence# which has at least some degree of flexibility in siting# should maintain at least a 60* separation from any adjacent residence. This proposal meets that criteria# with the hardship being the narrowness of the lot. Secondly# regarding the front setback# not:e that this is the end of a cul-de-sac road with an outlot for a future through road to the west. If the road ever was connected through to Devin Lane# a logical realignment of the cul-de-sac area to connect Outlot B to Outlot C would result in the house meeting the 50* setback (see survey). Staff Recommendation: Staff would recommend approval based on the following findings: 1. The narrowness of this recently created lot is a hardship in that it leaves little flexibility in locating the house to fit the landscape. Under code requirements# the allowable building envelope without variances is only 44* deep. 2. The proposed house location maintains at least a 60* separation distance to the nearest adjacent residence# which is the minimum residential side yard separation distance allowed in the RR-IB zone. 3. Topography and existing low lands on the property# and the necessity of providing a septic system on the property# are factors that make the proposed house locations and orientation the most feasible for this property. Hi U' , ff/So. e* CITY OP OKONO ~ VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After—the~Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Lot 2, Block 1 Kelley Green Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 5 » //"y ~ 3L-7 Please check one — Is the property abstract <or ., torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. it'.APPLICANT Name Colin Kelly & Lona Jane Shaughnessy Phone A75-1219 Mailing Address ____285 s. Rmun BH, T.nn^ T.ake. Mn. SSISB OWNER Name Mailinging Address / ^ ^^ Phone ^ Date Property Acquired (month/year) l/tdg^ (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property - / /? Residential _ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 150,000 Describe request in detail: Variance on the south side of lot of 12.7 ft. leaving a set back from private rd. of 37.3 ft. and on north feldt^ Of lOT of 17."5- ft. leaving -a- ■«« t -b€tck -Ppow-p-ropef^ ty- 44ne> -of- i t VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances (_X Other Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover Side ^ Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: Unusually short depth of lot makes it impossible to position our home on lot. ------------------------------------------------—— DESCRIPTION OP UUUSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventHCg compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: Lot which was plotted irCl97^ h ds very limited depth. This coupled with large set back requirements front and rear create extreme dltiiculty In— p ositioning of home. buildable site Is on western part of lot on top ot hill. ——h ome._______ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS •'^1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list^from Hennepin County Department of Finance^A-603 Govt Center- ^48-3271). ^ f); (,' ^ ^ ^ f Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. ^4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. '^5, Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and^correct to the best of his/her knowledge. ^ (\ ^ ^ Applicant's Signature Xcrm.-, ._ _ _ _ _ _ Date y a -- OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's SignatureS _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the tiiird Monday of each month. in MCL • iU Si H gCLUl QC ino UJ •-< oo t;CO oo w a tn 2 5 £visgs •H 10 Ul K) (0 (0 QC O in >- > ID -s§§5i^ O ID U> o in o g S 9! o z in o-• n M CO g IU •-« o M K < IM tt »-« S Z ^ IU IK> o in CO •« _ ^ fiO m o m o DC a M 5 c mCMI 1m COin 8O ^ < q:CM «J «8 n tn Z CL Z M -> OCMI > COf«> IU z o -4000 ■M CO o •>a°*CM z IU CO CM CD m o IU u: oo 8•o 2 mCMI Imo 8 KOO< IU 5Z 23 CLO KiU 2 so \< lUa rX << zI— •u< o oO CO oIU CM CC I o o d; z Ea03 Imo inCOooo uM o d; Z S2§**C«•IU CO MO to to m o CO COIU CLIU H*coIU CM O o CL COs LCL -.5CM O Kl CL CM IU I h-^ S^ Z Iin o in oCO CM K> O LU Z M O Z CO Z CL OIU HlU •«a ID inKl a in Qc m CL lU IU z tn COZ•u o oCM ^ o oo h*Ul Klinin mCMI >• >- oIU Ui CL i •J ^ Z IU UJ z Imo ^ X O IUzCO 10 CO J O O CO ^>- >- o o o in z^ -i CM o ooo oo M3inK> inin oo K3CMI >• >• oIU IU CL I -J -J ZN. IU IU S^ X l: o IK3O CLCO (O CD 2 p O CO ^ o o in §>- _ o•I CM O &K- QCOa g25 CL aZ IU < >• N. ao CL < Uiy ft 5 2 IC - X ^:< < z IUE U H CLCL E C3 C3 < CL 9 O Z IU < < >- Nz < IU CL IU CL E O CL .CL O H n c t c t c I i To:Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Pn Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning AdministraUr-: Date:September 10r 1986 Subject: #1072 Fred Winston# 765 Spring Hill Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lA, 2-acre Application - Variance to 150' horse barn setback requirement List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Application Plat Map Property Owners List Barn Plan Site Plan Survey Pertinent Facts: - Required horse barn property line setback *= 150* - Existing horse barn property line setback « 35.73' - Proposed addition to existing barn is 50'+/- from property line - Existing barn with proposed additions is about 500' from any off-site residences - Barn will be about 160' from wetlands - Dry area of parcel is about 11 acres Applicant also owns parcel to the south which contains about 12 dry acres Discussion: Applicant is currently acquiring this parcel on which he requests a lot-line setback variance to construct an addition to the existing horse barn. The total dry acreage controlled by Mr. Winston is about 23 acres, so he could have as many as 21 horses on the site. This barn does not appear to be large enough for more than perhaps 1/3 that number. The nearest off-site residence is 500' to the east, owned by Mr. Wildman. No comments have been received from him as of this writing. Mr. George Partridge's residence is about 500' north of the barn, and he also has not commented to date. Staff Recommendation: Given that this barn is 500'-plus from any off-site residence structures, and given that the addition will be on the side of the existing strucutres away from the lot line, staff recommends approval subject to applicant submitting a letter of non-objection from the affected neigh boring property owner, Mr. Wildman. - Tr X'>. Oo^ . riA)^ 1 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION i/Site Address /75~5~ !4]\\ /?rv, J . \AJruu? ' ) Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) o " // .^^ ~ ~ D O Please check one - Is the property \/^ abstract or _ _ torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT i/ Name f^recf tAj!Phone V'7,'?'7.A/^ Mailing Address ^(p Spt/r^j l^/:J" OWNER 7 Name "77A o ry\^s 5T fyt. C r A Mailing Address rP I 0 6^?_____ Phone ^ V3 ~ *7 oL H"______ R^.nk P(uce (Aj S':yYc Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 7c . D O \/'^Describe request in detail: A Icfi Dv-J c-> A r I I' -tr> Hr- ( T ^ r / < V.-tV ) mrnm mm mmm mm mm m w mm mm mm ^ mm mm t VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area 7 Setback Variances (_ _ _ Other P)cit'r\ ~ hoir,R Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) -A. HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; C j -4r ■ u c c y; x,,_ _ _ _ )^W'- > jrA 11' r,- --(ti .nic'nrf^^/ p^rp^rc-^ t'r.-i - ; _ _ _ _ _ _ i 1 )t /'i r/ i p\ t DESCRIPTION OF ONUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; .. ; (,c \ ^ c; y; 4M ^ / cr^, -A’.... -fe^ Jil2 —(yv^lA-S >- / t-.-.yr-'fi., Ii/\<vj r TTx /^.Cc~ . --V-/. .Vr ^k-irvr I :i Hs r ( f« -4-y„ ' ililwv - - - - - -— ——- - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - --- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. 4. 5. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. this application. Please not complete if the above APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. — /Applicant's Signature-^ [u Date ly/<SrL> OWNLRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature C- 'ts^ )Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. #107 I- intn ^ €M M • lUgo k“- g & MH *4 fiC K» S rCM M O •X in 0) Li COin in o Hr“?: uj o «J in in X pi „ ^ >- O St < in 3 CM M M M X ^ in tt X tL X g I in ^CM inCM ^ooin>-CO O UJ lU CM < m o o o ^ 3 iiM K» CM ICD I into COto CMI CO I CM COto X X UJ lU ^ zUJ UJu u »J •J *J M M 19 19z zM M gg in in to in ^ in o X ou inCM <►- >-1 P X O P opO P <o M O P H O M o X X M P M P X O p p P X P fc: ►-p P P P P P P St z z p X 0 0 0 P P p p pP Z O O M p u u CO -I ^ CO Z^ M M CO £ 0 19 X t- Z Z O < M M CO Kj XX >-a X o < in in X 3 z o < CM X z:0 . o o ^ -JO M M 3S ^ < to S M CM M 1 X CO X in-« uI to in <r < zCO o o to o o z< i: o o X M < M to in in p o <z o o SiXX in o m o ^ Xo ^ UJ o o -1=to CM I O P -i^ o I into o o c^ p o to o r z o o t- »- >- >• < < o o p p UJ UJ X X p p K CM UJ O K- St z in iU p u ^ * S E CM P CM -J X^ r to oo pCM to CMI P I Pto pto o oo Xu i •J <Ho H HP H PP 3 P U < >• >- X CM P P O P P X St O O Z P X X • N <C UJ ^5 < Z H tO X gp o P X XM P P ^ X H H ^ Z Z 0 P Pto 2CM M U U CtP P p I X p p Pp X P P p z^ P M M CM X T * * X •P O X X < to O P P X 3 CMoo o p CM I P I PP PP Xo o < X o aX z zM M X X P P iip p X Xo o O O u u P X X o < X q z p 3 >- \ X - P <C 3 o t- p X X o < a z < ^ a X po z a :iX o X oX o p < >- N, Wl/'*-'' ■^Vi ti' #J’,-'. * f. ^ •'ij*' • • • ^1. vffl•>' ■*“ t-Ca i^Z-4 DONALD C. WILDMAN 745 Spring Hill Road Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 (612) 475-0218 September 15, 1986 Planning Commission CITY OF ORONO Orono, MN This letter is to indicate my approval of the Winston's plan to construct an addition to the west side of their horse barn at 765 Spring Hill Road. Sincerely, DCW/tlz To:Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adpiinistrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Froai:Michael P. Gaffron^ Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date September 9, 1986 Subject: #1073 James Deanovic# 2050 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-3.A Application - Conditional use permit for grading and filling in excess of 100 cubic yards; portions of grading may infringe on 75* lakeshore setback. Lot Area - 1.65 Acres (Note; subdivision approved October 1975 with variance under current code) List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G - Application - Plat Map - Property Owners List - Original Plat of Hartwood - Existing Grades, Septic Locations - Proposed Grading, Site Plan - Septic Site, Probable Septic Design, Location of Old Roadway Exhibit H - Average Setback Review Pertinent Facts: Amount of fill to be placed (rough estimate by staff) 5,000-10,000 yards. Nearest anticipated point to lakeshore of proposed grading 60* Discussion: This is the last buildable lot of the Hartwood Subdivision (Pink Palace property). The main driveway originally cut through this lot but was moved last year to create a safer access, and which was required in order to make this a usable building site. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for major grade changes to the lot to create a suitable flat yard area and space for the proposed house and pool. The grading as proposed will not create additional run-off from the property, but will modify the drainage pattern within the property. Zoning File #1073 September 9, 1986 Page 2 The proposed grading does not affect the primary or alternate drainfield sitesr which have been tested and are suit able for standard trench drainfield systems. Note that because Outlet B, the lakeshore parcel across from this lot is coirenonly owned by the property ownerr this is considered a lakeshore lot. The proposed pool does not appear to be an encroachment on the average lakeshore setback requirements. City Engineer, Glenn Cook, has reviewed the site and grading plans, and his written comments are forthcoming. In general his recomii'endation is for approval with some changes and conditions: 1. Create a more positive ditch along County Road 15, similar to that on the adjacent lot to the south. 2. Regrade existing berm along 15 so it will allow a continuous grade from northerly interior swale to County Road 15 ditch. 3. Regrade storage area at southeast corner near culvert to create a somewhat larger storage capacity than what actually exists. 4. The existing culvert under County Road 15 is adequate for any anticipated flows. 5. Silt fence/hay bales/erosion measures must be in effect until lot is sodded or a vegetative cover is established. Note that the grading within the 75* set back zone is next to County Road 15 away from the lake, and is necessary to solve what is an obvious existing drainage problem next to the road. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for major grading of this property, including a conditional use permit and variance for the portion of grading in the 0-75* zone, finding that the grading will not cr^jate additional run-off to the lake, does not affect any neighborhood drainage patterns, and portions of which are necessary to alleviate existing drainage problems. Approval subject to: 1. Suitable erosion control measures during grading and until vegetation cover is established. 2. Following City Engineers forthcoming recommendations and requirements. FINAL NOTE: It appears that the original grade at this site is +/-934*-936* along County Road 15. Although it is anticipated that no fence will be constructed on the site, staff feels it is fair to warn the applicant that 934-936 will be considered as the original grade if a fence is constructed, and also noting the maximum 6* fence limitation above the crown of the road. P i i ■ - : ■ f i' ri • I i'•I ( n ,.i‘ 0«<#0 GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION . ^c^'>oo Cap -Tl-pJ > I PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) /o //7 2>3 jy (^0/4/ abstract or ^ torrens?Please check one - Is the property (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name pK/tc. Phone CS’? Mailing Address //S'3L. A?/". y/^J^. OWNER Name Phone Ul I" ^ Mailing Address A4AS , fhiCL^n (jU(u.vo.rCL. 0^3^/- 7* - - - - -^- - -f- - - -— Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f)Land Alteration ./Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision w OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. __ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning __________ $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Pi sent Zoning District Present Use of Property \JfirCL ♦N V Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed .Application Form. Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai Cernter 348-3^71)''"''®^'''' County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Pleas-' norSeen included! complete if the above information has •• •• •• mm mam • *• amm amm mm mm mm mm am mm ^m . APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees pp provide all information required or requested by the Zoning A<MiryL strator• agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurr^ ii7te^^^ of this application, and certifies that knowledge! ^ correct to the best of his/her Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date on of this request. ^investigation and veri Owner's signature Date P^anning’^Coiraissron f"to the City offices 25 days > third Monday of each month?’ Commission Meetings are held on thebefore the 5 */ ‘ * *4 Vl* a/K/ ^' r- o in s • tu g„ S lU rUJI-co>- (0 M g inM >•H Sa.o ins gsCLO£ I 5o oo < CD No o . o q: «J o <UJ H ^ O kU 90 O M 11.1 m tt CM ^ 0 CP I O M in CO ^ moo a ch cc m in UJ UJ in-I CD CD o < S z 2 H o >• in < o 3 o o o tt ID Sf CD m o 9-o c^ Qc m in M < a LU in m oc H ID oCM ID CO o I >* oc M < 3 ID CK z^ CD ID ^ I CD 3 IDin ^cOm o 3 CL < 5®< in CO CO SS3 <H 3 CM O O 3 3 O ID -> -> 3 °g>.>“5! m CMI iE||§ 3 in o in ID ID p-i in CO cn < in N <0m M M CM < ^ ^ CM 3 C o m m CM CO 90 o aO 3o ID ^ ^ CD <m o HM ID^ QJ 21»- UJ < CD p 3 CD PH Ui <!> ^ pH in CO CM in ID CO ^moo a < z oID 3 CD CD ID ID CD Ui O > M CO 3 Chm in in ID >- < < S“S<« U) N3 CM >• ID in <CD PH 2 ID O ^ pH m .-D pH M Xin y uCO *H D M m o »J 3 CM o 3 UJ ^ 3 ^ Z CO CO o M H oo m CM I oo 3ID 3 3 mCM .H toH J5I 3 C^o m 3 3 in ID ID in ID 3 z ^ ID Z 3 3 3 ID Os:s < < in o 3 3 CM 3 H( 3 3 O S ao g 3UJ • • u 3o3 O ID < >- N < UI X -i X H- pJ 3 <PH o H O ID O ID 0 3 3 3 0 3 3 CM X CM CO 3 3 ID CO ID ID pHCESs^a I 3 M M H inO 3 3 COPH X {Ezin K o; u) £ pH in ID ID H H O CO pH «J .D O ~J CO CM < < m 3 m o 3 3 m X COooo 3ID 3 3 3O m CMIN I in s 3 3 ID ID U. 3 Z< M •i «i ^ ID 3 3 3 ID O 3 IL X < < M O 3 3 CM Chm in in < >- m o 3 o o o ID CM M >• >• pJ < < m ID CO COvggg X M M pH U) -D pj 3 (^o m in ID in I in PC CO to CO in UJ UJ <oS5S m o 3 3 M z < UJ a X g|2- oo 5i &H c i *■* OUTLOT C y '' OUTLOT 0 £oywfv Jta9.40 • ••• /«/e. tfttM A J* •*' \ M/*f9’£7-£. /0.4S •• 7? ‘‘ V..-• ,• ; __/ « •• J • •• •• •« • 4 • •• .*••*«• Scpn c- UOCMTlOf^'i^ r% § ^ s ^n ^ Nm V ^ . 'I 1. ^ 9 n' i 5,ep7ic. s/r^S ouc> laoAiiiAJfe^ in >u f tor the Acorn Group of Lot 1, Block I, Hartv/ood Hennepin County, Minnesota SI « /) (hI J^hereby|Certjfy that tms is o true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of TO:Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members Pr<Jeanne A. Mabusth» Zoning Administrator Date:September 10, 1986 Subject: #1074 Grace Baptist Church, 2380 Shadywood Road Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.61, Subdivision 1 (C) - Beams (F) - Traffic Interference Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 A - (3) - Conditional use permit - allows 12 s.f. per surface Total 24 s.f. Allowed B 12 s.f. single surface Proposed *= 45 s.f. or 375% B - Illimination - diffused or indirect C - Setbacks, height 1) Setback Required « 5' Proposed = 10' from County Road and Navarre Lane 2) Height Allowed ^ $* Proposed = 22* Variance *=14' or 150%i List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Plat Map Property Owners List Elevations of Sign Site Plan Survey of Property (Application #384) The commercial-like signs associated with churches, schools and libraries within residential zones are procedurally approved with the site plans or landscape plans as part of the required conditional use permit review. The many alterations or changes in existing signage plans for these quasi commercial us-rr; are approved with a building permit. The sign proposed by the applicant suggests a dramatic change from the existing signage approved for the Grace Baptist Church. The original conditional use permit for the applicant was approved on June 15, 1978. The current sign is at a minimum 5 feet off the road right- of-way. The actual signage area (single surface) of existing sign may not exceed 12 s.f. The sign at approximately 10+ feet off grade does exceed the allowed height of 8 feet. Zoning File #1074 September 10, 1986 Page 2 The proposed location of the sign per Section 10.61, Subdivision 1 (F) must not be placed so as to interfere with proper functioning of a traffic sign or signal. Note the sign is proposed 30+ feet back from intersection and will not create a sighting problem for users of roadways. That is if Navarre Lane is ever open for public use. Navarre Lane has never been officially vacated. Get out to the site, staff sees no potential hazards with signage at intersection of 15 and 19 nor of other adjacent controlled intersections along Shadywood Road. Staff's major concern is with the iveralj height of the structure. The actual signage area for a single surface appears to be approximately 45+ s.f. - applicant should confirm. Ordinance is not clear, should area of cross be included, if so add another 33+/- s.f. (Is of 66 s.f.). Staff is not aware of any other church signage in the City that approaches this level of usage. Applicant should also confirm that lighting for sign will meet standards of Section 10.61, Subdivision 1 (C) and Subdivision 2 (B). Issues for consideration: 1. Is the allowed signage area within Section 10.61, Subdivision (2) of 12 s.f. per surface adequate for church, school, library users? a) If not, should the code be amended? b) If the code is adequate and City wishes to address each individual case as a variance, how does this application relate to ordinances and other signage approved for churches in the City? 1) Setback- Sign meets required distance from lot lines and intersection. 2) Traffic Interference - Sign will not interfere with traffic signals or signs nor pose hazards to users of adjacent intersection. 3) Height - the sign exceeds allowed height of 8 feet by a 150% variance. The 22 foot height and bulk of the sign is well in excess of any other church sign approved in a residential zone. Planning Commission members please advise if you know of any commercial like signs in residential zones that reach these standards? 1 Zoning File #1074 September 10# 1986 Page 3 4) Area - the sign exceeds the allowed area by a 375% variance. Once again# staff seeks Planning Commission input - are you aware of any other commercial-like signs in residential zones that reach these standards for area? Staff recommends that the Grace Baptist Church be advised to install the "standard" model sign and recommend approval of the following variances; 1. or 125% or 213% 2. Height Variance Required « 8* Existing *= 10* Proposed ® 17* Area Variance Required « 12 Existing * ? Proposed *= 30 s.f. or 250% s.f • Approval is based on the following findings; 1. The 17* sign is more consistent with previous commercial-like signs approved for residential zones. 2. The sign will not interfere with the functioning of traffic signals or signage nor pose hazards for users of public roadways. 3. The church has had a sign in excess of required standards within the street yard for several year without any reports of problems. 4. The unique shape of the lot and the location of the church building in relation to the approved height and proposed location of the sign will serve to lessen the impact of such structure. • h - i •* •• • * ♦ “•i •-K » /> n • • i w IF 9 4^> 4 /So •**<> A CITY OF ORONO - VTOIIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address _ _ _cJy.U^Or^jcV •_ _ _ _ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) /“T--^(/ QCkP^ Please chec\ one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name (■Hi i\Phone Mailing Address tmnsm ^7 Name LoOf g//__2 t 4 b Phon:; *^^3 ^ Mailing Address ^ ^ ^ ^ U/Ay Date Property Acquired (month/year) WAy VKw I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District 'h Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resultin enforcement: of zoning regulations | ^ If ft—^CrnUk.t^n I d9 4^Ti na frc 5J 5 IM I rom strict DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. 5. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is^^rue and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ONNERS SIGNATURE Date The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification o Owner's Signature Date Applicant must ha. e all submittal^int^^he City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. , vl ' lA ■‘.V ^v) 9 4 3^^^ H . > VV' V•* L. ' • 1 i 1 to ‘ ;*) 1.«' ^2t , ! M)(t« (H I 30 2i '^23' I • N«7« 4S'50“t NgT*4H'5c't ,«4 ‘ ir*y < y (SiJ K4 * ( o.t e f«!») >j. i Ni^VARRE I 3 COVE I A»-'^ 79 A - - C ^ - \V‘’’‘'''is ;5 f&D-'/ « wf —4^:V. ' < o O X <o Xp ^ a a iij5 fd 7* iv €VRNG€L r 14' ir- 6" . _ tj>*______ r A___I ir-7” SUPRA J 9*. 3 STANDARD XL WIDE HIGH ELECTRICAL SUPPORTING STRUCTURE CRATED WEIGHTWATTSAMPSFRAMEPOSTS 14'27'1350 14 5"x5"x3/16"6"x6"x3/16"2345# SUPRA 11*7"22'850 11.6 4"x4"x1/8"5"x5"x1/8"1785# STANDARD 9'3"17'650 7 4"x4"x1/8"5"x5"x1/8"1215# Heights are measured from the base plates — which are welded to the bottom of the supporting posts to the top of the cross. Widths are measured from the widest point of the supporting structure. SIZE AND PRICE COMPARISONS Standird Supra II f# • A ' Ml 160% 120% TI m larger signs are more cost efficleni J.M. STEWART CORPORATION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE STRUCTURAL CHANGES AND PRODUCT IMPROVEMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME WITHOUT NOTIFICATION. .• NOKTH $£AUe ‘. INFOKfWION WM TAKeN FKOM THE- ;R< PY ^O^PON ^ NOrTHI^Kl-Y UNBi^r U>T K Bl, S TOWKJ^lte Of UmtCH FAW;,/S rK^S^NffuY ou^gpiu? ! / C£NTERLINe OF CO»^KET& - -W- - A' / ,' OTE'Xl^TlW^i AUVAI^Y MEMOI^IAU CHUI^ • Ui. ^6HrilTT *tt^bOC. AIZ^HITETT^ I245i> WAYZATA 6<9UL.E.VAKP MWNeTONKA, MINNESOTA 5F343 ^oii) 515*^? / \ / / w "i Ul-iTtfVi KKiHT'OF'WAf T?-/ LINE A5 rReviOUiUY 5TAKEP PY OTH«y # * // /•$' ^\6tH ^MINIMUM) ^ '^Y* WA'Y WNe: OF |^»^p M 4HOWN ON PlAT^ lOUlKi^iTP oF LAH(iPON PAKJC. OF C^NT^HJE: of POAp A6 ^HOUJN ON PMT 0>(: T^WM^r^ OF UANCif^N T^>outh UINF.OF 5EO, n-in-i'S Tx^n/* !xiko, 1” - r.-l5-7l Iron marker L pT «h HM¥$nu 2.*! (« *• OLt^A »o *• ‘ ;■ ,>• - / * •: * 7 , t V '• :•> .'./ • * .% ■i • ■■• -5 i‘ .« o. •'^1 • j ■'':v:''%1 '-t. • . ••.•- ; '■•.\ ..' ■•’>1 •■». •■■• t;-'^'''*1 ^ ■ ■•*_ ' V' ' , 4t - ^ ■ *■-"17 • . .. ♦ t. V• % ^ • . W ■; • ‘ ■ r'-v• • . ’ » A* > 6 #v»- r 1 i T6: From Date: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P, Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 10, 1986 Subject: #1075 Joseph Durda, 3135 Horth Shore Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Soning District - LR-IB, 1-acre Application - Variance to 75' lakeshore setback to construct a patio and deck. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Application & Letter Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Building Permits - .1973, 1982 Lot Area/Hardcover Review Pertinent Facts: Required Lakeshore Setback = 75* Proposed Setback of New Deck =25* 0-75* Hardcover Allowed * 0% 0-75* Hardcover Existing = 11.27% 0-75* Hardcover Proposed « 11.50% History of Property: Existing house was constructed in 1973, allowed to be 40-50* from existing pond connecting to Lake Minnetonka. “ In 1982, an existing 12*xl8* ground-level deck was replaced with a second story screen porch 17'9"x22*6". This porch was noted on the permit as being 40' from "wetlands". Durdas bought the property after 1982, and were given permission, by the Building Department, to create 3* wide "catwalks" or balconies along the perimeter of the porch and at bedroom to allow for safety of the existing walk-out doors off the porch and bedroom (doors had been constructed to open into thin air). — Spring 1986 — Mrs. Durda had the existing 72 s.f. concrete patio removed, and replaced with 144 s.f. wood deck, without permits. - Deck and stairs are about 25* from edge of pond, old patio was about 30-35* from pond. I* *• :io Zoning File #1075 September 10, 1986 Page 2 Applicant requests after-the-fact approval of this new deck, and requests approval to construct an additional 3*xl6* catwalk to connect the porch balcony and the bedroom balcony. Discussion: Perhaps the initial issue to review is the status of the pond on this property. The pond was dredged out some time prior to 1960 but does not show up on plat maps as part of Lake Minnetonka. It is definitely connected to Lake Minnetonka and was issued a Conditional Use Permit for dredging and rip-rapping in January 1986. Staff feels that this pond definitely is subject to the 75* setback requirements for lakeshore property. Based on this, about 3/4 of this lot, including most of the house, is in the 0-75* setback zone. It appears that the porch permit in 1982 should not have been issued based on the 75* standard, however, it was issued. The matter at hand is whether to allow the new 144 s.f. deck to remain and whether to permit construction of the requested balcony. The patio nets out to about 72 s,f. of new hardcover that was not already in place, or an increase of about 2/10 of 1 percent. The balcony is proposed to be 3*xl6* or 48 s.f., and is mostly under the existing overhang, and with the rock beds along the perimeter of the house, the balcony will have a very small impact in increasing the hardcover.^ Is the professed ”need" for a fire excape route a sufficient justification to grant the variance for the balcony? Is there a demonstrated hardship that justifies granting after-the-fact approval for the deck? Staff Recommendation: If either or both of the projects are approved, you should make findings of hardship that justify the variances. If the deck is ®PP^®ved in full or in part. Planning Commission could recommend that the contractor be double-feed as a penalty on the required permit for whatever work is allowed. Note that there are extensive rock beds along the perimeter of the house. These are underlain by plastic, and staff would recommend that if any portion of the variances are granted, that an equal or greater area of plastic in the 0-75* zone be removed. io as the fn\\p v< J >'^ /Se>. oo JoL^. Re^: /9Cc^// Si. .- CITY OP ORONO “ VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3135 North Shore Drive. Orono. Minnesol:^^ 55391 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 09 117 23 32 0018 Please check one - Is the property abstract or ^_ _ torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Tract A, R.L.S. No. 1113, Hennepin County, Minnesota APPLICANT Name Joseph and Delores Durda Phone ^1-0624 Mailing Address 3135 North Shore Drive. Wavzata. Minnesota 5539i OWNER Name Joseph and Delores Durdv't Phone 4 71 - Mailing Address 3135 North Shore Drive, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Date Property Acquired November 1985_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Lakeshore Residential Present Use of Property Single Family_ _ _ n/a Other (specify) Residential n/a DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $1,100.00 Describe request in detail; Extend 3 foot wide balcony 16 feet to meet an existing balcony, and replace existing concrete oatin wi iih wnnf^ plank pTai-fr>t-Tn VARIANCES REQUIRED SldSOaik. Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other Setback from pond connected to Lake Minnetonka > . HARDSHIP ided on esota al 3 meet pi at-fr>rTTi gias^yaik. Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; Second floor balcony extension would provide a desired fire escape from the master bedroom; and the wood plank'piat- ^-£9?? sidewalk- replaces an unsafe and deteriorating concrete patio with a "stepped - - --—-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - --- --- - --wa4.kwayt DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal siced envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE « The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Pate August 21, 1986Applicant's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. ‘V Owner's Signature A-pateAugust 21, 1986 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. strict would plat- stepped Zoning RoBrRT P Larson Jeffrey W Lambert Kathleen M. Roer Lee R. Bissonette Bruce A. Boeder Patricia Yoedicke Kay H. McCarthy John H Rhode RiS^MONO E. PllRALNEN Larson ALBERT, v Attorneys At Law 1000 Superior Boulevard Wayzata , Minnesota 55391 (612)475-3435 August 21, 1986 ■A ^3 Of Counsll D. James Nielsen 1 >btain Center 3f the ed. ’lease above ed or ind/or s that Ls/her 986 irther tants, stigcx- CITY OF ORONO Building and Zoning Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Variance Application Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Durda 3135 North Shore Drive Ladies and Gentlemen: Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Durda, 3135 North Shore Drive, have retained our law firm to request setback and hardcover zoning variances, if necessary, to allow for certain construction related to their homestead. The contractor is Mr. Arlan Stoltenow, telephone 1-395-2652. Attached is the City of Orono - Variance Application, along with the required exhibits. First, the Durdas seek to extend a current three (3) foot wide balcony approximately sixteen (16) feet to connect with a balcony off the master bedroom. This extension is being requested primarily for safety reasons. The second floor master bedroom balcony is currently the only fire escape from the master bedroom. Please note that this balcony is of wooden plank construction which, although it does interfere with the direct absorption of rainfall into the ground, does allow for rainfall absorption into the ground between the planks. It should also be noted that this three (3) foot wide balcony is situated approximately eight (8) feet beneath an approximately thirty-two (32) inch overhanging eave, therefore the actual hardcover interference is significantly less than the three (3) foot width of the balcony. Second, the Durdas have replaced an approximately 72 foot square first floor concrete patio with an approximately 144 foot square wooden plank platform sidewalk. The former concrete patio had deteriorated to the point that it was unsafe as well as no longer fit for the purpose it was designed. The platform sidewalk was constructed as a logical walkway with steps due to the contour of the property. 986 re the on the Sbi UN City of Orono/Building and Zoning August 21, 1986 Page T wo Please note that this platform sidewalk is also of wooden plan construction which, although it does interfere with the direct absorption of rainfall into the ground, does allow for rainfall absorption into the ground between the planks. It should be noted that the former concrete patio was definitely impervious to rainfall absorption. The removal of the former concrete patio should allow for some increased absorption through the wooden planks into that ground which was formerly covered by the impervious concrete. The sidewalk is not constructed on permanent footings. The platform sidewalk is also situated on two of its four sides approximately sixteen (16) feet beneath an approximately thirty-two (32) inch foot overhanging eave, therefore, the actual hardcover interference by the sidewalk is somewhat less than the expanded square footage of the sidewalk. Mr. and Mrs. Durda request that the City of Orono grant the variances necessary to permit the replacement of the former concrete patio with a larger wooden plank platform sidewalk and to permit the extension of the second floor balcony. Please refer to the attached City of Orono - Variance Application. Contact me with your questions or comments. Sincerely, \LAl^ON & LAMBER REP/gm Enclosures cc: Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Durda Raymond E. Piirainen I Ift N P < lu in KI X r r X in CM H io int a < a a 1 a H K XSSiSS,NO X X id P u H^ u U tt X1 M M P £<ID o in o £ o O' q: q: X 0 in ui lij 0 mmm mJKi lij in 2:N 0 0 in 2 <•"••ammo OH liJ LU 0<0 tn 0 •-« CK m 0 -> -1 to 0 P m q: q: »-4 q:0m 0 u. u. m 0 H .'.^1 L C. r> 'A- A/ot^ 'flafJ ^wr^<rcr (/louo<o, lpfA\K', w\^/^j( ? pf't^fWi^ys^ ioials i9-3f% o~f <nhov<T f Tu^c'/ /^.area Wf/m^ J- J/.4 / / \ ■Z^'i POA/D ~fir,A/ai//70.0d £as^ ^ ft* ^ ^ ^ ’ '■• .• •ft* • :tr ‘ft* ^ o-De/to^es /ro/j /^onumen^ « • • I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries oft Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1113, Hennepin County, Minnesoto And of the locatiw of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments. If any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this 18 thda^of July /, 1985 ‘ i 'c4 f .V /Thomas S. Bergquist / ' Registered Land Surveyor, Minn. Lie. No. 7725 8ATHRE»Be«0QUI8T. IMC. t9l lAIT WAVXATft tlVO. ft <MftVtftTft.NM.MM1 TtllftMONt ftlt-ftTft^ftftft MALI .r^€o' mtMQi ZZ67-/ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY lOr EDINA REALTY ■ INSPECTION REQUIRED WORK REQUIRING TOOTING hcfoic puuf SEPARATE PERMITS r MATjUNG foucjhi ifi ______ ^ INSULATION PLUMnifJO ............. __________ WALLOOARD Bdorc T,i|»»im MICHAMCAL ___ _____ riNALlM*foM? occuptinty 1 L . _ . SIPTIC_............... WORK Bl VONU OR WITHOUT A Ml SfVVtM .............................. OUIREO INSPLCTION V^ILL BE SUli VVAflMJECT TO PENALTY C,MAPlM(i a r llLINli . .irjSPI Cl ION HOURS A/1 / IS/ LAILH l.»AM INSP 1 4PM f Al 1 1 A PM INSr NLXT DAV l.ltCfnu;AL l<om SliiU* 3 LEGAL OESCWPTIOM fl PLAT NVHA3EB RC^ UI3 t^S / PARCEL NUMBER i/ot>o 4 OWNER (Ntmtl rioFF (AOdrttt) |Bo©o (pn>A^ts ^M^wsuut<^ ^O‘onif 1 ARCHITECT (N4m«)(Addrtftt)tl»i rio 1 ’ROGfTl MCTvv\ A VJIC 70(2.1 VV2-2io? •. BUILDER (Namtl (A^fttft)(Ttl No 1 ftoc VJ\C70(2|A 3135 North Shore Drive - Hardcover Review Lot Area 0-75* * 31r300 s.f. Existing Hardcover: House (31.4x50 )■!•( 20x25 )•!• (11.4x25 )♦>•( 15x15) « 2 2 Porch (17.75 X 22.5) s Porch Deck 3* x 65 s.f. s Bedroom Deck 5* x 12* +/“ = Old Cone. Patio (Removed) as Rock W/Plastic N. End 125 s.f. 2r325 s.f. 400 s.f. 195 s.f. 60 s.f. 72 s.f. net NE Side 100 s.f. (Underlays 100% of Proposed Balcony) Around Porch 250 s.f. as 0-75* Total 3,527/31,300 Net Added W/Patio Deck « +72 s.f.; = 475 s.f. = 3,527 s.f. = 11.27% 3,527+72« 3,599 3,599/31,300 « 11.50% Lot Area 75-250* Existing Hardcover: Garage (35* x 27.8*) Driveway Rock W/Plastic Around Gar. Rock W/Plastic Between Driveway + House Additional Rock W/Plastic 13,300 s.f. 973 s.f. 3,000 s.f. 250 s.f. 1,050 s.f. 600 s.f. 5,873/13,300 5,873 s.f. 44.2% •CAil /-rSO'CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for1857“ 40 fMI SO Plil NO. ZZS7-/EDINA REALTY TO: om SOBJ: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator September 11, 1986 #1079 John D. McDowell - Sketch Plan Review 3820, 3830, 3860, & 3750 Bayside Road List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - DNR -Protected Waters Map D - Soils Map E - Subdivision - Sketch Plan P - Orono's designated wetlands map Per Section 11.10 Subdivision 6A — The purpose of the sketch plan review is to provide the subdivider an opportunity to present his conceptual plans for development. This specific review process serves as a basis for conceptual discussion between the City and subdivider, hopefully, providing beneficial savings for the subdivider. Criteria/Standards to be considered — 1. Location, arrangement and size of lots 2. Need for park land dedication 3. Review potential development of adjacent undeveloped lands - need for through roads, shared access, linking roads, etc. 4. Relation of specific ordinances of Zoning Code - a) Need to rezone from RR-IA to RR-lB or LR-IA b) Conditional use permit required to construct road within designated wetland - note per Exhibit C not a DNR protected wetland - Corp of Engineers and MCWD must review the engineering plans for the road. c) Access to lot 1 must be approved by DNR or seek private easement through adjacent properties to north and east (see plat map) d) If rezoning is approved. Lot 1 must still remain in Zone Luce Line should remain north boundary line of new extended RR-IB or LR-IA Zone. Lot 1 can be combined/sold to adjacent northern property owners. If used as a residential lot ~ variance must be approved and septic testing required to assure buiIdability. Zoning File #1079 September 11,1986 Page 2 of 3 e) Determination on shared use of Outlet A - riparian lot - special lot combination and variance required. Current LMCD standard requires 50' per boat slip - should each lot be allowed shared dock use as in Fox Hill plat? f) The lot owned by Anderson that appears as an exception should be included in the rezoning ~ owner should sign formal application. The subject property also includes the Harris and Gardener property. Both owners should sign formal application. Location, Arrangement ^d Size of Lots Applicant should be advised that all existing structures/improvements should be located on preliminary plat. 2 acres of dry land must be contiguous within the boundaries of each lot. Building envelopes must provide 200' widths. Usual variance must be granted to all lots served by private road. Parkland Dedication The City already has a park in this neighborhood and will require park fees in lieu of land. Future Development of Undeveloped Lands Lands to the east have been developed - review Exhibit B, City did not plat access to western lot lines of Riedel Co. Stubbs Bay Addition plat. Lands to west are bordered by major expanses of designated wetlands. Property is bordered by Luce Line on north. Staff seeks Planning Commission input on need for future access. Rezoning Issue - Review the intent/purpose of the RR-IA zoning district Section 10.27, RR—lB Section 10.28, and LR-lA Section 10.23. Review the following sections in your Comp Plan: Rural Area Goals and Policies CMP 2-6, 2-7 Environmental Protections Goals CMP 3-18 General Policies for Natural Resource Management CMP 3-19 through 3-22 Rural Area Policies for Natural Resource Management CMP 3-23 Rural Land Use Policies CMP 4-19 through 4-22 Rural Residential Land Use CMP 4-27 through 4-31 Issues for Consideration on Question of Rezoning - 1. The majority of the subject property is located within 1000 feet of Lake Minnetonka - are the current standards of the RR-IA district suitable? 2. Is the current pattern of use more consistent with RR-IA district? - LR-IA? RR-IB? 3. Is this spot zoning? Zoning File #1079 September 11, 1986 Page 3 of 3 4. Is this area suitable for quasi agricultural uses associated with large lot rural areas? 5. If all lots satisfy non-sewered, rural standards, are there other environmental concerns that must be address? 6. Review CMP 4-28 "1 dwelling per 5 acres" - a) Does this section imply that if citizens do not desire this type of density that they may petition for a change? b) Do you agree the basis for this zoning is historic and not environmental? c) Is the north shore of Stubb's Bay pattern of development similar to the development of properties in the "northwest corner of the City"? Will the rezoning make major changes? Good? - bad? Planning Commission should be prepared to give conceptual direction to applicant on the following: 1. Rezoning. 2. Use of riparian outlot — define limits in use. 3. Soils maps, wetlands location strongly suggest inability of applicant to provide 2 acres of dry contiguous land in each lot nor does it appear these are suitable soils for septic systems. 4. County Highway Dept, must approve location of access road. 5» Provide direction for Lot 1 — access question. PEES - CONDITIOISAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a)Residential accessory Use $150.00 b)Institutional (church, sc $150.00 c)Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d)Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 t)Land Alteration r.i rrens? led on ST3s^ i\ ore OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT.__ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning _ _ __ $200.00 Appeals ^ ^ Other ~ see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District - <LcO Present Use of Property $i ,jc|Vq, Residential OtKer (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail; _ _ _■^3Vv^CVv-Vjq\\\.A Vap, REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the name on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. \ The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT * S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. N Applicant* s signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date * j The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City officec; > w ^ third^M^darorelch^mlnth?' Coitutiisslon Meetings are" held°ln the 1:'■ * ' - A ’' o "o "’-1 • ft LrBC (Oft 1 1 ' rxov\ l®y L*rB LrC KkD J I v**^ v ^Ha l^\1 \7^'V ' a <?]