Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-16-2024 Planning Commission PacketAgenda Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, January 16, 2024, 6:00 PM 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 /https://www.oronomn.gov/ 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge 3. Approval of Minutes 3.1. November 20, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes 4. Public Hearings 4.1. LA23-000062, Granite Companies LLC o/b/o Travis & Sara Wildenberg, 3838 Cherry Avenue, After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit 4.2. LA23-000064, Brent Walton, 2405 Dunwoody Ave, Hardcover Variance 4.3. LA23-000065, Eskuche Design, 4423 North Shore Drive, Variances 4.4. LA23-000066, Hendel Home, 2605 Mapleridge Lane, Variance 4.5. LA23-000068, Murphy & Co. Design o/b/o 3400 Fox Street Trust, 3400 Fox Street, Average Lakeshore Setback Variances 5. New Business 5.1. LA23-000067, Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, Concept Plan 6. Council Update 7. Adjournment Sign up for email notifications at https://www.oronomn.gov/ 1 Item No.: 3.1 Date: January 16, 2024 Presenter: Laura Oakden Presenter: Director of Community Development Section:Approval of Minutes Title: November 20, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes 1.Purpose: The Planning Commission should review and approval the draft minutes attached. 2.Staff Recommendation: Motion to approved the November 20, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes AGENDA ITEM Exhibits 11.20.2023 Planning Commission Minutes.pdf 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION November 20, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 6 ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Acting Chair Jon Ressler, Commissioners Dennis Libby, Ted Schultze, Bob Erickson, and Gary Kraemer. Commissioners Chris Bollis and Mark McCutchen were absent. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Natalie Nye. Acting Chair Ressler called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Libby moved, Schultze seconded, to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2023 Kraemer moved, Schultze seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of October 16, 2023. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. LA23-000045 ELLETTE ANDERSON AND JAMES & MELISSA EASLEY, 1250 SPRUCE PLACE & 1260 SPRUCE PLACE, REQUEST VACATION OF THE ADJACENT UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF "LAKE STREET". City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicant is requesting to vacate the unimproved right-of-way situated between 1250 Spruce Place (owned by James & Melissa Easley) and 1260 Spruce Place (owned by Ms. Anderson, the applicant). This unimproved right-of-way is also known as “Lake Street” on the plat of Saga Hill, Revised, and it terminates at the High Water Level of North Arm Bay. There are no City utilities within the right-of-way, however there are riprap spillways facilitating overland drainage from Spruce Place and approximately 900 square feet of the Easleys’ driveway. The City Engineer does not recommend vacating the right of way as the site serves as a draining way for the area and has also been identified as a possible future public accessway to the lake. The City does not have any Park improvements in that area. The access has a public purpose because of the drainage way, Curtis said. There are identified lake access points in this area including Sandy Beach located to the south, which is established as a swimming beach, and the City’s fishing dock off of Loma Linda Avenue to the north. Both access points are less than 500 feet from this location. Curtis explained the challenge with vacating rights-of-way is that vacation is final. Should the public or the City have access or utility needs in the future, the cost to taxpayers to reacquire the property will be at a premium, she said, so vacation reduces options for the City in the future. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) also opposes the vacation as it does not provide a public benefit and does not protect future public use of the land to access the lake. Public comments in support of the vacation were received. Staff recommends denial of the request to vacate the right-of-way at this time as there is currently a public benefit for drainage purposes and the future purpose of the land is undetermined. Libby asked if the area is served by City water or private wells. Curtis said the parcels have private wells. 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION November 20, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 6 Ressler asked how this vacation might differ from other vacation requests in the City. Curtis said each vacation request is reviewed individually and staff looks at the use for the right-of-way in each case. Ellette Anderson, 1260 Spruce Place, one of the applicants, said when her parents bought the property in 1962 the easement was a muddy mess with litter and broken glass and beer cans and old docks. In the 1970s the City determined the easement was not suitable as a lake access, in part because it can fill up with water three feet deep. The public has not used the access in 40 years. She said there are two places very nearby that are much better lake access. The water that drains in the easement has come into their basement, she said, requiring them to spend $15,000 on tiling. The family has maintained the easement for 40 years with mowing, boulders and cleaning. They also spent $20,000 on riprap at the shore. Another benefit, she said, would be that the Easleys could pave their gravel driveway, eliminating problems from gravel run-off. It is the only driveway on the street that is not paved. She said both applicants would pay more taxes if the easement was vacated which is money that could be spent on the other nearby access points. James Easley, 1250 Spruce Place, noted that drainage on that easement serves the whole area and the water is sometimes 10 to 15 feet wide. They occasionally get trenches in their driveway from washouts. He said there are a number of really nice trees in the center of the easement, adding the neighbors have done a nice job of landscaping and taking care of the easement in such a way that it keeps the water out of their homes. Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:16 p.m. Scott Youngstrand, 1270 Spruce Place, said his grandparents once lived in the Easley home. so he can speak to the 40 years that it has just been a drainage ditch. He said they are in favor of vacating the easement and that if concern is access for the public, there is a very nice access right up the street. Heather Youngstrand, 1270 Spruce Place, also said she also supported the vacation. Phillip Casey, 1318 Spruce Place, asked about the DNR’s reasons for opposing the vacation of the easement. He recommended the Planning Commissioners drive by and take a look as it appears like normal residential lots. He said the easement is so narrow and that anything that was put in there would be a nuisance for the neighbors on either side. Curtis said the DNR does not typically support a vacation unless the vacation itself serves a public purpose. Jennifer Linder, 1240 Spruce Place, said she has been in her home for 14 years. She said the gully would not serve any purpose to the public and during a power outage it is so full of water that you could raft down it. It is of no value to the public for recreation, she said. Leslee Casey, 1318 Spruce Place, said her backyard is part of the trail system that connects to public access by Cherry Place and it is enjoyable, easy to get on the lake and is enjoyed by many people in the area. Most people don’t know the easement being discussed is a public access, she said. There is nothing to show it would be a way to the lake. 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION November 20, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 6 The original owner of the Anderson property, Ms. Anderson’s mother, said she has spent a lot of time and money making sure that watershed works like it should environmentally and she knows her daughter will continue for the next 50 years. Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:23 p.m. Ressler noted the subject of vacations has been polarizing in the City. He said he has been supportive of vacations when there is no chance the easement will have public use and he realizes there is better public access nearby. Schultze asked what would change on that piece of property if the vacation went through. Ms. Anderson said it would be a benefit to the neighborhood to have the Easleys be able to pave or cement their gravel driveway. She said it would also be a safer access for the Easleys. Schultze said it sounds like the neighbors have literally taken ownership of that property and put a lot of time, effort and money into it. Ms. Anderson said they had done so mostly for the water flow issues which benefits the entire area and keeps dirty run-off from the street from going into Lake Minnetonka. She said she would not expect to change anything about the property or build anything there. She would just plan to keep taking care of it as they are. Easley said they would also like to be able to control the drainage by putting in a retaining wall so the drainage would not become a giant river and would match the Andersons on the other side. He said he thought there would still be room to get a vehicle through there down to the lake if necessary. Erickson said the situation provides a model case as to why the lake access section of the City’s comprehensive plan was revised. He complimented the applicants for supplying the City’s letter from 1979 that described that easement and said it was not useful for anything else but foot traffic to the lake and that is should not be used for a boat launch or any other public purpose, which he said supports that there is no public use for this strip of land. He said these policies force land into a situation in which it sits there in limbo. The neighbors can’t improve a driveway because they don’t own the land. He said over half of the old easements in the City are not used by the public but then the City needs to look at them case by case. Usually there are good reasons why they are not used, and the City policy language stipulates that one consideration will be whether there is no other lake access nearby. That is not the case here with two other close accesses, he said, adding this is a real model of one that should be approved. He said the planned improvements would improve their property values and the values for the whole neighborhood. Libby said to state the obvious this isn’t a public access in any way, shape, or form. Historically, these lanes were intended for fire access since there are no hydrants, but pumper trucks no longer pull water from the lake to fight fires. The sticking point here is that if there is a vacation it should serve a larger public good. He said it does serve the good of the two property owners but he doesn’t see that it serves the larger good of the neighborhood or the City so he is not persuaded that the easement should be vacated. He said there was definite benefit to the City in the care the neighbors have taken of the property. He suggested an approval for vacation in conjunction with an easement for drainage. 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION November 20, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 6 Kraemer said he does not see a public benefit to keeping it or a public benefit to vacating it. He appreciates that the neighbors have taken care of it for many years. He said the Planning Commission is advisory and he would like the City Council to weigh in. Ressler agreed that the land has no benefit for a public use today. He asked if the public benefits from land that cannot be used or from land that is privately maintained and taxed. He also pointed to possible public expense to the City to maintain the land if it remains an easement. He said clearly there would continue to be a need for drainage on that strip of land and possibly a drainage plan could be put in place along with any vacation. He would like to have an engineer evaluate the easement for any drainage improvements. Curtis said the Commission could recommend maintaining the drainage easement along with a vacation. She said if the vacation is approved it would be imperative to maintain the drainage easement. She explained the DNR’s position is a recommendation. Staff would recommend maintaining the drainage easement but any improvements to drainage would be a separate issue. She said the County makes the determination on how the easement would be divided between the two neighboring properties if it is vacated. Kraemer moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000045, 1250 and 1260 Spruce Place to vacate an unimproved right-of-way contingent upon maintaining a City drainage easement. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 2. LA23-000060 BRIAN BENSON, 3600 CASCO AVENUE, REQUESTS VARIANCES FOR AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK AND HARDCOVER TO EXCEED 25 PERCENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOME. City Planner Nye gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home on the property and construct a new home in a similar location. The property is uniquely shaped with an extreme average lakeshore setback that does not allow a reasonable building envelope. The existing home on the property is entirely forward of the average lakeshore setback line. The property also contains a wide easement. The applicant is requesting variances from average lakeshore setback and to exceed the hardcover maximum of 25 percent in order to construct a new home. The applicant has identified the property’s unique flag shape and position on a point as practical difficulties. The flag-shape of the lot creates a very long driveway that comprises a large percentage of the overall hardcover on the site. The driveway is 355 feet in length and over 15 percent of the overall hardcover. Staff agrees with the applicant’s assessment. The property is a unique shape and does not have a reasonable building envelope due to an extreme average lakeshore setback. Due to the placement of the neighboring homes, building in front of the average lakeshore setback line would not impact their views of the lake. If the property had a standard driveway length, the property would be in compliance with hardcover. Staff finds the variance requests to be reasonable and in character with the neighborhood, as the current home on the site is in a similar location, she said. Staff recommends approval as applied. Brian Benson of Compass Real Easte of Wayzata, representing the developer, spoke as the applicant. He said the situation was an illustration of the need for variances. The new house would be placed in about the same location as the old house. The design of the new house is classic and minimizing massing to fit in with the neighborhood. They are proposing a reduction in hardcover from 34 to 29 percent but would still be over the 25 percent because of the driveway. He noted the neighbor also uses part of the driveway. 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION November 20, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 6 Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. Ressler said it sounded like a good plan. Kraemer said any time you get that reduction in hardcover he is in support. Libby moved, Kraemer seconded, to approve LA23-000060, 3600 Casco Ave. Variances as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. 3. LA23-000061 OUTDOOR EXCAPES, 2601 CASCO POINT ROAD, REQUESTS A 75 FOOT LAKE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RETAINING WALLS WITHIN THE LAKEYARD. City Planner Nye explained the applicant is proposing to construct a new lake stair and two new retaining walls within the lakeyard. The property is currently experiencing erosion on the hillside that is impacting an existing lakeside shed and oak tree. The property has some boulders that are no longer preserving the hillside. While new lake stairs are permitted within the lakeyard, a variance is required for any new retaining walls within the 75-foot lake setback. The applicant has identified the erosion of the hillside and protection of the existing shed and mature tree as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Staff finds the existing conditions of the property and the preservation of the existing structure and tree as practical difficulties which support the variance request. Staff recommends approval of the lake setback variance for the construction of two new retaining walls as proposed with the condition that additional screening of the walls where feasible be implemented to preserve the natural vegetated view from the lake. Drew Torrence of Outdoor Excapes spoke for the applicant explaining the proposal is trying to solve the problem of erosion and would serve a functional purpose of holding up the hillside. He said what they are proposing would also be a dramatic improvement from an aesthetic standpoint. Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. The owner of the home introduced himself but had no additional comments. Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. Ressler pointed out the staff described the improvements as minimal and staff doesn’t use that term lightly. Schultze moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA23-000061, 2601 Casco Point Rd. Variances as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. OTHER BUSINESS Peak Agenda Management Introduction 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION November 20, 2023 6:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 6 Community Development Director Oakden said the City is going to a new management software for agendas and packets by the end of the year and Commissioners will be receiving an email with user name and will be asked to generate a password. The program will be through Granicus which is the vendor being used for other aspects of meeting management. She walked the Commission through how the agenda and supporting documents will appear and work. Update on November 13, 2023 City Council Meeting Oakden updated the Commissioners noting all the items from the last Planning Commission meeting were approved by the City Council on the November 13 Consent Agenda as applied. Several applicants amended their applications to include Planning Commission recommendations before going to the City Council. Libby said he was scheduled to attend the Dec. 11 City Council meeting as Planning Commission liaison and asked for another Commission member to substitute. ADJOURNMENT Schultze moved, Kraemer seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. The Orono Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. ATTEST: _________________________________________ Christopher Bollis, Chair 8 Item No.: 4.1 Date: January 16, 2024 Presenter: Melanie Curtis Presenter: Planner Section:Public Hearings Title: LA23-000062, Granite Companies LLC o/b/o Travis & Sara Wildenberg, 3838 Cherry Avenue, After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit 1.Purpose: The purpose for this item is to review an after-the-fact conditional use permit for lake slope retaining walls. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received on October 30, and considered to be complete on December 7, 2023. Due to the lack of a Planning Commission meeting in December, the 60-day application review deadline has been extended an additional 60-days and will expire on April 5, 2024. 3.Background: A new home is under construction on the subject property. Following demolition of the previously existing home, the applicant began installing rip rap under a permit from the MCWD. In the process of installing rip rap, the applicant removed the entirety of the lake slope vegetation including trees, the existing wooden lake access stair, the existing stone walls, and debris. They began installing a new stone slab lake access stair and new angular boulder retaining walls. Because the applicant had not received a permit from the City for the work on the lake slope, staff issued a Stop Work order and began working with the applicant to bring the property into compliance. The staff report attached as Exhibit A contains a full background and detailed analysis. 4.Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission table the application and direct the applicant to provide the additional supporting information required by Code justifying the walls as proposed. Additionally, the Commission should direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to provide more substantial native trees, shrubs, and deep rooted perennials. Planning Commission Action Requested: The Planning Commission should table the application and direct the applicant as noted. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A - Staff Report.pdf Exhibit B - Application, Narrative.pdf Exhibit C - Proposed Survey annotated.pdf Exhibit D - Existing Survey annotated.pdf Exhibit E - Proposed Plans.pdf Exhibit F - Site Photos.pdf Exhibit G - Aerial Photos.pdf Exhibit H - Resol 7336.pdf 9 Exhibit J - MCWD permit.pdf Exhibit I - Ord 284, 3rd.pdf Exhibit K - Stop Work Notice.pdf Exhibit L - Hardcover Calcs.pdf Exhibit M - Map and Property Owner List.pdf 10 Date Application Received: 10/30/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 12/07/2023 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 04/05/2024 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 16 January 2024 Subject: #LA23-000062, Granite Companies LLC o/b/o Travis & Sara Wildenberg 3838 Cherry Avenue Conditional Use Permit: After-the-Fact Public Hearing Background A new home is under construction at 3838 Cherry Avenue. Variances were granted in January 2023 to allow expansions of the home within the 75-foot and average lakeshore setback areas; a variance to allow 32.6% hardcover was also approved. Resolution 7336 is attached as Exhibit H. Following demolition of the existing home, the applicant began installing rip rap under a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (Permit 23-310, attached as Exhibit J). In the process of installing rip rap, the applicant removed the entirety of the lake slope vegetation including trees, the existing wooden lake access stair, the existing stone walls, and debris. They began installing a new stone slab lake access stair and new angular boulder retaining walls. Because the applicant had not received a permit from the City for the work on the lake slope, staff issued a stop work order (Exhibit K) and began working with the applicant to bring the property into compliance. In November of 2023, the City Council adopted Ordinance 284, Third Series (“Ordinance 284”) regarding retaining walls within the 75-foot setback from the ordinary high water level of protected lakes and tributaries. Ordinance 284 is attached as Exhibit I and provides for the installation of retaining walls within the shore setback zone as a conditional use permit. Ordinance 284 includes provisions for administrative approval for the replacement of existing walls meeting certain standards. The applicant has provided a landscape plan and a cross-section drawing to illustrate the placement of the new walls. According to the newly adopted code, the applicant should provide documentation demonstrating that the existing walls and or slope were failing, as well as a plan showing that the new walls will not exceed 4 feet in height and will be in the same location as the existing failing walls. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting after-the-fact approval of a conditional use permit to construct new and replacement retaining walls on the lake yard slope within the 75- foot setback from the OHWL. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends tabling the application; the applicant should provide the additional plan information requested. 11 FILE # LA23-000062 16 Jan 2024 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Pre-Demo/ Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 22,5925 s.f. 5,648 s.f. (25 %) 7,755 s.f. (34.33%) 7,090 s.f. (31.4%) Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Sections 78-1279 and 78-916) Section 78-1279(3)(c) states that a wall within a defined bluff and bluff setback; and/or a replacement wall 4 feet in height or greater; and/or any new walls shall require a conditional use permit. New walls and replacement walls greater than 4 feet in height must meet the following conditions. The wall must be: 1. Designed to correct an established erosion problem; the applicant has indicated that the new walls were necessary to preserve the lake slope due to the existing wall failure and neglect over time; and 2. Suitable given the demonstrated need; The replacement walls do not meet the “in-kind” definition and the applicant has not submitted sufficient substantive evidence of the existing slope/wall failure. A structural analysis should be provided. This criterion has not been met; and 3. Designed by a registered engineer or landscape architect, depending on project scope; the applicant has not provided a statement from a registered engineer or licensed landscape architect supporting the need for the currently proposed number and location of replacement walls. This criterion has not been met; and 4. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem. The applicant has not provided evidence as to the appropriately scaled replacement wall solution. This criterion has not been met. In addition to the conditions listed in Section 78-1279, Section 78-196 provides a list of conditions supporting Conditional Use Permit (CUP) issuance. The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a CUP as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. Based on the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; the new walls and landscape plan will help to preserve the lake slope. Protection and preservation of the natural lake shoreline is an identified priority of the Comprehensive Plan. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; retaining walls within the lakeyard are permitted where they are deemed necessary to protect the integrity of the slope. The applicant has stated the existing walls were failing. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; the property meets this standard. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; the property meets this standard. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; the retaining wall project should not generate an excessive demand for public services at a public cost. 12 FILE # LA23-000062 16 Jan 2024 Page 3 of 5 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; the installation of replacement stone retaining walls including the proposed landscape plan to screen the walls will be compatible with the uses within the surrounding area. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; the installation of replacement stone retaining walls, including the proposed landscape plan to screen the walls, will be compatible with the character of the surrounding area. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; the installation of replacement stone retaining walls including the proposed landscape plan to screen the walls will be compatible with the character of the improvements within the surrounding area. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; the lakeshore slope improvements should not impact the neighboring property values or the enjoyment of the neighboring property owners. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; the applicant has provided a landscape plan which, once matured, should provide adequate natural screening and buffering of the retaining wall improvements when viewed from the lake. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; the proposed walls should not create a nuisance situation. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; during the construction timelines for the home and the lake slope improvements, there will be additional nonresidential traffic on Cherry Avenue. The applicant and home builder are responsible for repairing any damage to the public improvements and shall keep the streets clear of sediment and debris at all times. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; the applicant has opted to install replacement walls using boulder materials and has proposed landscaping that will screen the walls and will be compatible with the character of the improvements within the surrounding area. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; the lake yard improvements should not result in any lighting or glare being cast off the property toward the public street, the neighbors, or the lake; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. This is true of the project. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. 13 FILE # LA23-000062 16 Jan 2024 Page 4 of 5 Conditional Use Permit Analysis: Analysis of an after-the-fact condition is not ideal as some of the factors for evaluation can be missing or altered. In this situation, the applicant has provided photos and a survey showing some detail about the slope and pre-existing walls before their removal. The proposed new wall installation appears to be more substantial than the previously existing walls. The complete denudation of the slope with the removal of all vegetation, including the root structures, and all of the structural elements holding the slope has resulted in the creation of a more vulnerable slope. However, the Code requires the applicant to demonstrate that the existing wall and/or slope is failing as well as confirmation from a licensed professional stating the proposed solution is appropriate and sized correctly. This has not been provided. Further, the proposed landscape plan consists primarily of low to mid-height grasses, perennials, and shrubs with a few hydrangea trees scattered throughout. The stripping of the slope exacerbates the proximity of the home to the lake. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested CUP? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Commission Consideration The following items were not submitted and should be provided by the applicant: 1. The required statement of need and reasonableness about the slope stability and the currently proposed wall plan from a licensed professional; and 2. A revised landscape plan including a mix of mid-height, deep-rooted perennials, native shrubs, and native coniferous and deciduous trees to provide a natural-looking, year-round screening of the proposed walls and the mass of the home. Options for Motion: 1. Deny the application as applied*; or 2. Move to table the application and direct the applicant to provide the requested information for Planning Commission review on the February agenda; or 3. If the Commission is generally comfortable with the proposal, move to approve the CUP with conditions and direct the applicant to provide the requested information to be reviewed by staff before placement on a City Council agenda for consideration. *Because the application is after-the-fact, if the application is denied, the Commission should identify the next steps for the applicants. Staff recommends the applicants be required to restore the slope and stabilize the slope with nonstructural, vegetative solutions. A reasonable timeline for compliance should be provided. Planning Staff Recommendation Because the existing conditions have been altered, Staff recommends the Planning Commission TABLE this item until the following items are submitted for review to ensure the new proposed plan 14 FILE # LA23-000062 16 Jan 2024 Page 5 of 5 meets the newly created conditions for allowing retaining walls in the lakeyard. 1. A statement from a licensed professional regarding the need for the currently proposed walls; and 2. An updated landscape plan as described above. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Staff Report Exhibit B. Application & Narrative Exhibit C. Proposed Conditions Survey Exhibit D. Existing Conditions – Survey Exhibit E. Proposed Plans Exhibit F. Site Photos Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. Resolution No. 7336 Exhibit I. Ordinance 284, 3rd Series Exhibit J. MCWD Rip Rap Permit 23-310 Exhibit K. Stop Work Order Exhibit L. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit M. Property Owners List & Plat Map 15 10/31/23, 2:44 PM Permit List | Citizenserve https://www5.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87873285&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:10/30/2023 Address:3838 Cherry AVE Orono, MN 55364 Parcel Number:0811723330003 Land Use Number:LA23-000062 Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner Owner:Name: Travis & Sara Wildenberg Address: - Travis Wildenberg Applicant:Name: Corey Scherber Company: Granite Companies LLC Address: 7280 Dickman Trail Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076 scherberco@yahoo.com Contact Information:Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:Retaining wall replacement by lake Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 16 My wife and I acquired this property in July 2022. There had been obvious deferred maintenance on the house itself, the street side yard, and the lakeside yard, hill and shoreline. Throughout the summer of 2022 and this past summer we began doing some minimal maintenance and a little cleanup of the lakeside shoreline and hillside. It quickly became apparent that the shoreline and hillside would require more than just a small facelift, and rather a complete restoration would be in order. My initial concerns were encountered while mowing the grass and doing a little cleanup of the overgrown vegetation and vines covering the hillside. I found that the walls were extremely unstable and rocks were routinely falling down the hillside when lightly disturbed. We quickly had to stress to our children that they were not allowed to play on or around the hillside for fear that a stone from the walls would fall on top of them. Further inspection of the retaining walls revealed that they were collapsing and thus directing water runoff right towards the foundation of the lakeside deck and this needed to be corrected. In addition to the faulty retaining walls, the shoreline walls were in terrible condition. They were collapsing right into Lake Minnetonka. We also uncovered a patchwork of what appeared to be portions of granite countertops that had been pieced together to form somewhat of a boardwalk along the lowest lakeside tier of the hill. I’m not versed in the legal nature of such a structure, but regardless we found it undesirable and sought to correct it. Ultimately for my family, it boils down to the safety of the yard and the hillside. My children are 8, 6, and 4 years old. They will be climbing up and down that hillside and playing on those walls. I will be walking in front of those walls and need to store docks and boat lifts that will be supported by those walls. In order to do so safely, we propose to replace the existing dilapidated and collapsing rock retaining walls with new, stable granite rock retaining walls. 17 Practical Difficulties  •(2) Inherited these problems, we did not create them •(2) Due to unmitigated erosion and lack of any upkeep, drainage was being directed toward foundation walls of the deck rather than away.  •(3) updates and replacement of walls will NOT alter the essential character of the locality, they will enhance it. It is a lake house, the lakefront needs to be safe and it needs to be accessible. The existing dilapidated stone retaining walls were crumbling, many were even falling into the lake. •(10) Necessary for the preservation of our right to a safe, functional, and accessible waterfront. Stairs stopped 3 feet in the air at the bottom. Retaining walls were falling down, risk of injury to my kids, my guests, and myself. •(11) On the contrary, the improvements will IMPROVE the safety of the land •(12) Definitely not just a convenience. The neighbors (several times) have griped to us about the dilapidated condition of the lakefront and retaining walls. There is a huge safety issue with the state of disrepair of the walls. I have children that will climb around on anything. If one of those flagstone rocks falls on them it will cause serious bodily injury. 18 19 Lake MinnetonkaCherry Lane# 42379LICENSE NO.Thomas M. BloomDATES1OCTOBER 27, 2022Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-796417917 Highway 7Web: www.advsur.comAdvanceSurveying & Engineering, Co.CLIENT NAME / JOB ADDRESSSHEET TITLEPROPOSED SURVEYSHEET NO.SHEET 1 OF 1DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE40200222063 JRDRAWING NUMBERDATE DRAFTED:DATE SURVEYED:SEPTEMBER 14, 2022OCTOBER 27, 2022LEGENDSHEET SIZE17 X 22SCALE - 1" = 20'LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Lots 8 and 9, Block 3, CRYSTAL BAY VIEW, Hennepin County, Minnesota.SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listedabove. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own,which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records orconsult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correctand that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included onthe survey have been shown.2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for thesurvey.3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the cornersof the property.4.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment.There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed bya current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show anyeasements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon.5.Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines,are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building.6.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review andfor the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over theserequirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding withconstruction.7.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of thetopography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use indetermining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relateonly to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check atleast one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations foruse on this site or before beginning construction.8.While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiarwith your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review ourproposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verifythat they match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiarwith local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoningofficials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or anyother officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements andobtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements tothe property.STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:"●" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted.REVISION, LLC3838 CHERRY LANEORONO, MN20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Existing Certs 1551121 11 111HI 11111111111111 LAND TYPE Torrens (T) DOC NUM 5998417 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Feb 7, 2023 11:44 AM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Amber Bougie, Registrar of Titles Daniel Rogan, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 87 Pkg ID 2536248E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. 35 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7336 A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-1279, 78-1680, & 78-1700 FILE NO. LA22-000055 WHEREAS, on October 19, 2022, Travis and Sara Wildenberg ( hereinafter the Applicants"), applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 3838 Cherry Avenue and legally described as: Lots 8 and 9, Block 3, Crystal Bay View, Hennepin County, Minnesota hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variances from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a second story addition 20 feet from the OHWL where a 75 -foot setback is required and lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variances from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1680 and 78-1700 to permit 32.9% hardcover where 33.9% currently exists and 25% is permitted to construct additions to the existing home and change the hardcover; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 2022, the Planning Commission reviewed the application and provided direction to the Applicants for revisions; the Planning Commission recommended denial of the variances as applied; and WHEREAS, prior to City Council review, the Applicants provided amended plans reflecting the proposed second story 32 feet from the OHWL and a proposed hardcover reduction resulting in 7,380 square feet (32.6%) total hardcover; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2023, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff and directed preparation of findings for approval of the variances reflected on the amended plans. 36 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7336 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as amended and described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA22-000055. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR -1C One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.52 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 100 feet. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: a. Hardcover Variance b. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance c. 75 -foot Lake Setback Variance 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." The variances for expansion of non -conforming building within the average lake setback and the 75 -foot lake yard setback are supported by practical difficulties. The established 75 -foot lake yard construction prohibitions are intended to maintain the natural lakeshore and encourage development away from the lake. Additionally, the goal of the average lakeshore setback regulations is to protect views of the lake from neighboring homes. The requested variances to expand the volume of the existing home were designed to utilize the existing home footprint while maintain open space on the lakeside to reduce the lakeward mass and to preserve views for the 37 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No.7336 neighbors are in harmony with the Ordinance. The reductions in hardcover and are also in harmony with the Ordinance. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in modifications to the existing home including volume and footprint expansions in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. The minimization of the structural massing of the new second story within the lake setbacks is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The existing principal structure is situated almost entirely within the lake and average lakeshore setbacks. The proposed expansion of the home lakeward of the average lakeshore setback and within the 75 -foot lake setback is reasonable as the second story has been designed to minimize the lakeside massing. Additionally the variance reduce hardcover on the Property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The existing house was not constructed by the Applicants. They have a right to maintain or re -build the existing nonconforming home in-kind. The proposed home expansions have been designed to minimize impacts to the lake and to neighboring properties. Additionally, the nonconforming hardcover is proposed to be reduced; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The proposed variances to expand the footprint and the volume of the home will not increase any nonconforming setback and will result in a reduction of hardcover. The proposal has been designed to fit within the character of the neighborhood. The home expansions and reduced hardcover are supported by practical difficulty and are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 38 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.7336 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This criterion is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the LR -1C District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This criterion is not applicable. 1. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The conditions applying to the existing home are unique, and support the requested variances. 8. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The location of the existing home is a unique condition which does not apply to other homes in the district. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." The improvements proposed to the existing home will allow for the home to better function for a family with children. The variances are reasonable and preserve the rights of the Applicants. 10. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals. 11. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The variances provide an increase in home square footage, improved aesthetic, and outdoor living space near the OHWL which improve the livability of the property and are designed in a way that minimizes new encroachments and do not increase existing nonconformities. 39 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No.7336 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a second story addition 32 feet from the OHWL where a 75 -foot setback is required and lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; and variances from Sections 78-1680 and 78-1700 to permit 32.9% hardcover where 32.6% currently exists and 25% is permitted to construct additions to the existing home and change the hardcover, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated October 27, 2022 and revised on December 15, 2022 and revised building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A building permit must be obtained within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (January 23, 2024). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of January 2023. ATTEST: na Carlson, City Clerk CITY OF ORONO: Dennis Walsh, Mayor 40 I N a d J ui µ aru yl.M .0 r y' o ^ i x anx d „ d 5 N xP JJ \. d _ rre- max IIm m , - • a "^ saes m P <rs x'-— rre) P a J141 ' ISP a q y X \ PR N J\ P as g MW o m ui I _ z tNI— r- x Xm / X x — — 1_ _ X' mmN 0 0 mP W m x — P" - p - x Na l m x ssai+- L--- ----- g QO Q a w m JI li ^ I m F 3' iy U v ry a h l_ o e a m a` o y W 16 P5 m m Y- m m m m m m m n b0+ I ex£ N a ^X X._\e °m' OJ I Fi p k`7c-tL— mom\ I P gEtuoa c o JH t a Px P,m. -O S6l-- x -x a m a aQ3P L = a O aya ;9* 0 N \ X o G V d°54J M °m• Pu°7 p c o qqy d W f'1 v Rig 2oox p Z11 I 13 N O i Ia = d Q \ IN w N 6m;;am0 6ui; six3 I Ny o odkb w a o o b w o o oq q 0 o . > w _ U aYCow°-0 o o o U > R 0O °> b $ p °' o? ° o.p ° h ctlO°oo U> °°p•° c7a'nbo`°>,°° c y „ FL. Cd a U off' o od o oF>¢?ao U 5i Y a Ca o y v> a>i g o o °' o a o> w G r a U U :: U O 0xbL7UGhOA ,.0 U O 'O o °y N o O° . • cF0 y0 °^ U O ma" aUi o y c 0 42 o y o> U P° C' U U G F.,r o o F» >. y "o b ° > ° Q td -d 4. N U O w N N h awU wbc ax°oaca ab LF0r Urd7a< ° K0. ooYlo i ° wOWaO23 P. in o p tl CO>> w O b^ ro ap 4-. o Yo to 3 Na°E aO to ° towo° oOPvAzd7] A° N° ° N C W m== ®® ka ( WtlI N ? tew y soF w l OZ m wp y o 3 Cl. o 0 o fio W o U F • WPI a a U) .-< N M 11; 1 06 i 41 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed professional land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Thomas M. Bloom P. L. S. No. 42379 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) Example) Garage 24'x 30') (720) S. F. A House 4,209 S. F. B Concrete Drive 1860 S. F. C Deck North 575 S. F. D Covered Stoop 134 S. F. E Stone Areas 113 S. F. F Concrete 213 S. F. G Lake Side Stepper Stones 80 S. F. H Ret. Walls 174 S. F. I Front Paver Walk 296 S. F. J S. F. K S.F. L S. F. M S. F. N S. F. O S. F. P S. F. Q S. F. R S. F. S S. F. T S. F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S. F. y S. F. Z S.F. 1) Total Proposed Hardcover 7,654 S. F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 Ret. Walls 174 S. F. Decks with 1/4" spacing (Width needs to be verified) 100 S. F. S.F. S. F. S. F. 2) Total Excludable Hardcover 274 S. F. 3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 7,380 S. F. 4) Total Lot Area 22,592 S. F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)] 32.67% 42 2 Qv No LU 0 s W Z zF "' ww%w$ w QLU N V O `p 0 N Q V mZw0 0 pre b6'66— v i cesx sEs x u B E6 X I 1'yC6 X y X 6E66 X -- j t BE6 I E.. Ez 6 w v5E6 x ash x E.` E6 x 6 I ILU s 666 x 9,Pe6 X/69e6 x save o'es X tcm W w aa0 o z 4".k x des x o y'6Eesh x H OR C z33s II xo- y mossX6 PeM ' Es c y e6 x m m 6uI11eMa 6ugsix3 p< > 6 x a I ses 3 i °j °xe'666 s sz J/Z w X I BDeaE6 x33 tgoo I ase,a 6 0 w x' pQ— I E6 * - xsaEa`3 ss i O 6.6 0 - m - -" 046 mop e p oyseiyl QKOy s6ae x e aVs X W W m a j N 6u1110MG, 6ulyswo moawa,e6ffi c s sa JJ4-bz ua 9°fi E6 /e'ee6- —sa Ee 0-6. go u k'8 9Xr6 Z s v yrs nii yzor u 0u X i O G3 aal m Jo a6p3. eaZYa ae ( 7 ` ezfi 0 4i b' zJne6 oeu u _4,Ez' Xo zzw a z uJZz do a25 s d3Oz y3 xuo auuiy zml ao_ wi Z a wZ!2> 3£ moo u+ aw,le oys fiU, spam pue 6_-, P.jepdepp PN X9F.6 I E.. I I ILU o H 00 y m m O u S w wI iuz Z O 6a om aX 0 I 2a> d A6e6 I--------_ x wz„_-.---.--- oo k'8 9Xr6 Z s v yrs nii yzor u 0u X i O G3 aal m Jo a6p3. eaZYa ae ( 7 ` ezfi 0 4i b' zJne6 oeu u _4,Ez' Xo zzw a z uJZz do a25s d3Oz y3 xuo auuiy zml ao_ wi Z a wZ!2> 3£ moo u+ aw,le oys fiU, spam pue 6_-, P.jepdeppPN 43 aub7 fraat Pea'o to BP -3 3.9Z'to e9e S z°s a. r — 46' 66-- i ecesx s es x a66x 6x Dass X 'sze x 9716w ds66 x 6L > I 1 s66 s aes x E6 x W o o - sc6xi I ' sM X/6es6 x- E6 X N i Wa 3 ' o I la. zs66 X 6 x . I6.Ys X -. W 8'98M a L.I. x a6 zz_ esu ' M -nses6x is u' 66ce X I p¢< 5. p0,wodt9a0'r u Z o0 O6ullleMa6upsix3466x/. s w o 9 9z066 o p f hes X o n reO I 9 oo£6 t; ff 0. w fixx es6s ses x 6Efi 9 6 IL 8046 mop le Ploysa141 Y Y ssse X aeOvs s< wu, 6uplann OI 6ulyslx3aN s sseX I m m'e eses [ sqz 6, ec fl a x Z a. 6e ual9 M LUix Z ww wWzmFm w Nw s -- Q W vOg poto =o v) Q laz6 Is V .Zo s eZ eF pp Mo 0 zfi s4 y 5Q Z aub7 fraat Pea'o to BP -3 3.9Z'to e9e S z°s a. r — 46' 66-- i ecesx s es x a66x 6x Dass X 'sze x 9716w ds66 x 6L > I 1 s66 s aes x E6 x W o o - sc6xi I ' sM X/6es6 x- E6 X N i Wa3 ' o I la. zs66 X 6 x . I6.Ys X -. W 8'98M a L.I. x a6 zz_ esu ' M -nses6x is u' 66ce X I p¢< 5. p0,wodt9a0'r u Z o0 O6ullleMa6upsix3466x/. s w o 9 9z066 o p f hes X o n reO I 9 oo£6 t; ff 0. w fixx es6s ses x 6Efi 9 6 IL 8046 mop le Ploysa141 Y Y ssse X aeOvs s< wu, 6uplann OI 6ulyslx3aN s sseX I m m'e eses [ sqz 6, ec fl a x Z a. 6e ual9 0. LU s -- laz6 Is Imm s eZ eF pp G F 3 s _ _Jel m to a6P3 . 0 zfi s4 y 5Q Z 0 TGxuOcYiy° z m7P o 0 o 9£ 6 HW lodol Njewq* a9 X, uses --"_________"____ _ x 4'09 zsX 5 ef69'OL ax d Zw OWV z6OZ ZIw sce wO V X o p aun u wO 366O.z 166 " 5 ou lwoys s6 Buole 1j..Pue Bul-1 Palep, dei!0 alory 0 1 X30 0. LU 0 o 0 u oo QoaoOam Wis uses --"_________"____ _ x 4'09 zsX 5 ef69'OL ax d Zw OWV z6OZ ZIw sce wO V X o p aun u wO 366O.z 166 " 5 ou lwoys s6 Buole 1j..Pue Bul-1 Palep, dei!0 alory 0 1 X30 44 YV wD Z LO N Xw Z w O_> NSU OQZ CL we O Q w az OO LU ZQr X r > " "s "sa o Z u 0 o w > Z -wwWW w M LU T: Q V Z o2 N Qgo V Try NO W o 0 YV wD Z LO N Xw Z w O_> NSU OQZ CL we O Q w az OO LU ZQr X O S o o Z u g M o O- Nuj O ra a O w V O 2 n U a Z ~9 171 Q x LL Lu o w N ON OQ Cl - 0 O N 0 cl Q YV wD Z LO N Xw Z w O_> NSU OQZ CL we O Q w az OO LU ZQr X Nuj ra a w UJw UJ Y N JO 0O 171 45 W °oN O LL CL O w LUWJ LUWCL0 - WW a o wwWWwj w11Z F LU VQ N QZ <O ZV.12Try NO W 0 W °oN O LL CL O w LUWJ LUWCL0 - WW 46 H, a o Z Z Ww ww w zm F° w Q w MO A Mp wO U aw x O R 0 Z F- N Xw xvw „a,oc > _ f 3X7XIUuni.ov,n Q n Rx 47 a o Oe ; 48 I LU QOe z Wwwww zm Fm W V O ao w w N M pVZ 0 I 49 EWN 0 d 0 iLd Z Q Q W J HN W h LU > Z ZWwwww W V w DOW Q O V mz o zo WO A N Q Mp EWN 0 d 0 iLd Z Q Q W J HN W 50 lowYir 51 a w 17 Al 52 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D, and on the basis of statements and information contained in the permit application, correspondence, plans, maps, and all other supporting data submitted by the applicant, and made a part hereof by reference, PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED to the applicant named below for use and development of land in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Issued: Travis and Sara Wildenberg Permit No: 23-310 Location: 3838 Cherry Ave, Orono 55364 Purpose: Erosion Control & Shoreline Stabilization – single-family home partial demolition and new construction, existing riprap repair (Michael Paul Design Build) Date of Issuance: 9/14/2023 Date of Expiration: 9/14/2024 By Order of the Board of Managers _____________________________ Maria Friedges Permitting Technician This permit is not transferable without District approval, and is valid to the date of expiration. No activity is authorized beyond the expiration date. If the permittee requires more time to complete the project, an application for renewal of the permit must be received by the District at least 30 days before expiration. The applicant is responsible for compliance with all District Rules and for the action of their representatives, contractors, and employees. Conditions: Project to be completed as described in plans submitted to the MCWD office on July 17th, 2023 according to the provisions of this permit. • Properly install and maintain all required erosion control measures until the disturbed areas are re-stabilized • Notify MCWD in writing upon completing installation of perimeter and sedimentation controls • When the site is re-stabilized and the MCWD staff has performed a final inspection, all perimeter control must be removed (Statement concerning fees for inspections, violations, etc... on following page) 53 Inspection/Analysis/Monitoring Fees A site inspection and monitoring by District staff will be performed where the activity involves: • a commercial/industrial/multi-family residential development • a single family residential development greater than 5 acres or of any size if within the Minnehaha Creek subwatershed • any alteration of a floodplain or wetland • dredging within the beds, banks or shores of any protected water or wetland • a violation • any project which in the judgment of the District staff should be inspected due to project location, scope, or construction techniques In these cases, the applicant shall pay to the District a fee equal to the actual costs of field inspection of the work, including investigation of the area affected by the work, analysis of the work, and any subsequent monitoring of the work, which in the case of a violation shall be at least $35. Standard Fee Schedule District professional staff $ 65.51* District clerical staff $ 46.69* Consulting Senior Engineer $ contracted rate Consulting Engineer/Technician $ contracted rate District Counsel $ contracted rate Application fee $ 10.00 Copy costs $ .25 + actual staff time Color copy costs $ 1.00 + actual staff time * Hourly 54 ORDINANCE NO. 284, THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO RETAINING WALLS THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter 78, Section 1, Definitions shall be amended by removing the strikethrough text and adding the underlined text: Retaining wall means a wall or similar structure designed and constructed to hold back and prevent lateral movement of earth or other landscaping materials. Two or more abutting boulders, 24 inches in diameter or greater, placed to hold back the earth are considered to be a retaining wall. Landscape edging, less than 6 inches tall, is not considered a retaining wall. SECTION 2. Chapter 78, Section 566. Accessory Uses. shall be amended by removing the strikethrough text and adding the underlined text: within 75 feet of the shoreline. 4-413)Home occupations, as defined in this chapter. All home occupations shall comply with the provisions of section 78-1376, and the licensing provisions of section 26-76, when applicable. 4414)New boathouses within 75 feet of the shoreline are specifically prohibited. SECTION 3. Chapter 78, Section 1279. Placement of buildings and structures on lots shall be amended by removing the strikethrough text and adding the underlined text: 5) Fences, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall be placed within the Shore Setback zone. Portions of dock located landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject to the regulations for landings per section 78-1282. Retaining walls shall not be placed within the Shore Setback zone. within the Shore Setback zone may be permitted according to the following: a) A retaining wall may be constructed within the shore setback zone if it is an integral part of a permitted lake access stair and the retaining wall is designed to be the minimum size necessary. b) A replacement retaining wall, including a change in material, may be permitted within the shore setback zone when all of the following conditions are met: 1. The wall is under 4 feet in height, and in the same location, and 1 55 2. The existing wall shows signs of failure. c) A wall within a defined bluff and bluff setback; and/or a replacement wall 4 feet in height or greater; and/or any new walls shall require a conditional use permit. New walls and replacement walls greater than 4 feet in height must meet the following conditions. The wall must be: 1. Designed to correct an established erosion problem; and 2. Suitable given the demonstrated need; and 3. Designed by a registered engineer or landscape architect, depending on project scope; and 4. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2024 upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this 13 day of MN ,2023 on a vote of ayes and nays by the City Council of Orono,Minnesota. ATTEST: Christine Lus >City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2023. 2 56 From:Melanie Curtis To:"Michael Laumann" Cc:Peter Eskuche; Travis Wildenberg; Abigail Ernst; "Maria Friedges"; Laura Oakden Subject:STOP WORK NOTICE - Unpermitted Shoreline Work / 3838 Cherry Pl Date:Wednesday, October 25, 2023 1:39:00 PM Attachments:Permit 23-310.pdf Importance:High Michael Following up our phone conversation, I visited the site and spoke with the Granite crew working on the walls, stair, and rip rap. I instructed them to stop all work not associated with the rip rap on site as you do not have the proper City approvals. The MCWD issued an erosion control, shoreline stabilization and rip rap permit for the site (attached). The rip rap stops at or about the 100-year flood elevation (931.5’). All work above the 931.5’ contour is under Orono’s permitting authority. No permits have been issued for retaining walls, lake stairs, or other improvements on the property. The only valid City permit is the Demolition permit for the home. The lake access stair requires a City zoning permit. Please submit an application for an after-the-fact zoning permit for the stair. The application should include an updated survey, construction plans, engineering (if applicable), cross-sections, and hardcover calculations. The retaining walls, grading, and other structural improvements require Planning Commission and City Council approval and cannot be administratively approved. All work must stop immediately. The slope must be stabilized immediately as the timeline for City Council approval will take several months at this point in the year. Submittal deadline for the Variances for the retaining wall work in the 75-foot setback is December 20th; this is the deadline for the January 16th Planning Commission meeting and February 12th City Council meeting. Please reach out with questions. Your attention to this matter is appreciated. Melanie Melanie Curtis, Planner 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Website: www.oronomn.gov Email: mcurtis@oronomn.gov Direct 952.249.4627 Planning & Zoning Department 952.249.4620 57                                                                       City of Orono                           Hardcover  Calculation  Worksheet                 Property Address:  38389 Cherry Lane (our survey 221599 TB)                 Prepared by:  Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379 Date: 11/8/2023 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:  (Circle one)Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3   Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:  EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form).  Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to  Survey Hardcover Item (Describe)        Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example)(Garage)   (24' x 30') (720) S.F. A House 3,427 S.F. B Concrete Drive 2574 S.F. C Deck North 575 S.F. D Deck South 110 S.F. E Stone Areas 329 S.F. F Concrete 271 S.F. G Ret. Walls 257 S.F. H Landscape with plastic 469 S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1)  Total Existing Hardcover 8,012 S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78‐1684) Ret. Walls 257 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.    (2)   Total Excludable Hardcover 257 S.F.    (3)  Net Existing Hardcover 7,755 S.F.    (4)   Total Lot Area 22,592 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)]34.33% 58 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed professional land surveyor under the  laws of the State of Minnesota. Thomas M. Bloom Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379 Step 2:  PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form).  Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to  Survey Hardcover Item (Describe)        Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example)(Garage)   (24' x 30') (720) S.F. A House 4,148 S.F. B Concrete Drive 1854 S.F. C Deck North 541 S.F. D Front Covered Stoop 138 S.F. E Concrete AC Pads 17 S.F. F Ret. Walls 246 S.F. G Front Paver Walk 296 S.F. H Stone Steps to Lake 62 S.F. I Lake Side Stepper Stones 34 S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1)  Total Proposed Hardcover 7,336 S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78‐1684) Ret. Walls 246 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.    (2)   Total Excludable Hardcover 246 S.F.    (3)  Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 7,090 S.F.    (4)   Total Lot Area 22,592 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)]31.38% 59 38 08-117-23 33 0001 JAMES W BECK 5152 BELMONT AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 38 08-117-23 33 0002 CARIN OFFERMAN ERIC D SVIEN 3826 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0003 TRAVIS WILLIAM WILDENBERG SARA ELIZABETH WILDENBERG 1421 NORTH ARM DRIVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0006 ENGLUND COTTAGE LLC 3855 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0007 ENGLUND COTTAGE LLC 3855 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0008 ENGLUND COTTAGE LLC 3855 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0009 ENGLUND COTTAGE LLC 3855 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0020 GUY W FELDMANN 3908 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0038 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 33 0039 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 33 0040 LISA J MERNIK PO BOX 64142 ST PAUL MN 55164 38 08-117-23 33 0043 ANN WEEKS ENGLUND 3884 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0044 ANN WEEKS ENGLUND 3884 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0045 PAUL TAYLOR 3883 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0048 ROGER GRANNING 3898 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0049 ANN WEEKS ENGLUND 3884 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0050 ANN WEEKS ENGLUND 3884 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0054 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 33 0055 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 33 0056 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 33 0057 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 33 0059 EVELYN B HAAS 3820 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 33 0084 ANN WEEKS ENGLUND 3884 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0085 ALSRT2 LLC 10528 PARKER DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 38 08-117-23 33 0087 PAUL TAYLOR 3883 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0088 ALLAN C LARSON ELIZABETH LARSON 3852 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0089 MATTHEW B & AMY B HERMAN 3825 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0090 STEVEN ENGLUND 3855 CHERRY AVE ORONO MN 55364 38 08-117-23 33 0094 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 33 0095 BENJAMIN C DZURIK MELANIE K DZURIK 3860 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 60 38 08-117-23 34 0063 NANCY L BLAIR 3768 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0064 PAULA J JOHNSON 3818 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 21 0029 BARRY JON CARLSON DEBBIE MARIE CARLSON 3805 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 17-117-23 22 0002 MARK A & MARY A DOBRATZ 3865 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 17-117-23 22 0045 KELLE M BOWE 3845 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 17-117-23 22 0048 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 18352 MINNETONKA BLVD MINNETONKA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0049 GREGG STUART SUTTON 3825 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 61 He nn epin Co u n ty L oc ate & N o tify Map 383 8 C h err y Av e nue 0 100 20050 Feet Da te : 10 /30/2 023 Buffer Size:500Map Co mm e nts : Th is d ata (i) is furn ish ed 'AS IS' with no represen ta tion as tocompleteness or accuracy; (ii) is fu rn ish ed with n o warra nty of anykind; an d (iii) is n ot suitable for le ga l, eng ineerin g or surve yingpurposes. Hennepin County shall not b e liab le for a ny da ma ge , in ju ryor loss resu lting from this dat a. Fo r mo re inf ormation , co nta ct Hen ne pin Co un ty GI S Off ice300 6th S tree t So uth , Minn ea polis, MN 5 5487 / gis.in fo@h en ne pin.us 62 Item No.: 4.2 Date: January 16, 2024 Presenter: Melanie Curtis Presenter: Planner Section:Public Hearings Title: LA23-000064, Brent Walton, 2405 Dunwoody Ave, Hardcover Variance 1.Purpose: The applicant is requesting a hardcover variance to convert the existing driveway hardcover to a garage addition changing the nature of the hardcover. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received on November 9, 2023, and considered to be complete on November 15th. Due to the lack of a Planning Commission meeting in December, the 60-day application review deadline has been extended an additional 60-days and will expire on March 14, 2024. 3.Background: The applicant is proposing to construct an attached garage addition over the existing driveway hardcover. Because the property exceeds 25% hardcover, a hardcover variance is required to convert the driveway hardcover to building hardcover. The proposal also results in a 155 square foot reduction in hardcover. Please refer to Exhibit A for a full analysis and background. 4.Staff Recommendation: Finding that the variance is supported by practical difficulty, Planning Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variance resulting in an overall reduction in hardcover to allow the addition. Planning Commission Action Requested Planning Commission should make a motion to recommend approval of the variance as applied. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A - Staff Report Exhibit B - Application Exhibit C - Practical Difficulty Statement Exhibit D - Proposed Survey Exhibit E - Plans Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G - Resol. No. 3956 Exhibit H - Aerial Photo Exhibit I - Property Owner List Exhibit J - Map 63 Date Application Received: 11/09/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 11/15/2023 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 03/14/2024 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 16 January 2024 Subject: #LA23-000064, Brent Walton, 2405 Dunwoody Ave, Variance Public Hearing Background The home was constructed in 1997 with variances granted for hardcover. The site appears to be generally consistent with the 1997 approvals. Currently, the property exceeds the 25% hardcover limit by approximately 1,100 square feet with a level of 33.5% existing hardcover. The applicant is proposing to construct an attached garage addition over the existing driveway hardcover. Because the property exceeds 25% hardcover, a hardcover variance is required to convert the driveway hardcover to building hardcover. The proposal also results in a 155 square foot reduction in hardcover. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the relatively long narrow shape of the property as a practical difficulty supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided some supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit C and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that the narrow shape of the property and the existing condition of 33.5% hardcover create difficulties in any expansion of the home. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 – Setbacks: LR-1C DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Addition Rear/Street 30’ 100’ 79’ North Side 7.5’ 11.5’ 14.3 South Side 7.5’ 10’ 10.7’ Lakeshore 75’ 80’ House 70’ Deck The addition is on the street side of the house and complies. Average Lakeshore The home meets the average lakeshore setback. The addition is on the street side of the home and complies. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a hardcover variance to convert the existing driveway hardcover to a garage addition changing the nature of the hardcover. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. 64 FILE # LA23-000064 16 January 2024 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-350 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1C DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ Actual 13,680 s.f. (0.3 acre) 50’ @ 75’ / 50’ @ OHWL Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 13,680 s.f. (0.3 acre) Allowed: 2,736 s.f. (20%) Existing: 1,968 s.f. (14.3 %) Proposed: 2,544 s.f. (18.5%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 13,680 s.f. 3,420 s.f. (25 %) 4,580 s.f. (33.5%) 4,425 s.f. (32.3%) Applicable Regulations: Hardcover Variance (Sections 78-72 & 78-1700) The property has a legal nonconforming condition of 33.5% hardcover where 25% is allowed. City Code Section 78-72 allows for the administrative approval of relocation or a change to an existing legal nonconforming use. The request to change the driveway hardcover to building hardcover thus increasing the mass of the nonconformity cannot be approved administratively. According to Section 78-72(b)(3) which states that nonconforming non-structural hardcover may be relocated, including full replacement provided that “the relocation does not physically enlarge the size of the nonconforming use”. . . and “the relocation does not substantially change the character of the nonconforming use”. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. 65 FILE # LA23-000064 16 January 2024 Page 3 of 4 According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The hardcover variance resulting in a reduction of legally nonconforming hardcover is in harmony with the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The requested variance results in a reduction of hardcover which is consistent with the goals within the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; the request to convert the existing hardcover to a home addition while reducing the hardcover percentage is reasonable and is not permitted administratively. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; the existing hardcover level, shape and size of the property, and location of the existing improvements were not created by the owner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The hardcover variance to permit the construction of a home addition and reduce the overall hardcover level will not alter the essential character of the area. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a home addition is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The existing hardcover level, shape and size of the property, and location of the existing improvements are unique to this property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The specific conditions do not apply to many of the neighboring properties. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variance is necessary to preserve the owner’s property rights. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variance is necessary and is not merely a convenience to the owner. 66 FILE # LA23-000064 16 January 2024 Page 4 of 4 The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variance resulting in an overall reduction in hardcover to allow the addition. 67 11/20/23, 3:16 PM Permit List | Citizenserve https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87897189&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:11/09/2023 Address:2405 Dunwoody AVE Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number:2011723220008 Land Use Number:LA23-000064 Application Submitted By:Property Owner Owner:Name: BRENT D WALTON Address: 2405 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 Applicant:Name: Brent Walton Company: Address: 2405 Dunwoody Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 bwalton2@me.com Contact Information:Associated Contact: Jeff Danberry Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:Addition to home Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 68 11/20/23, 3:16 PM Permit List | Citizenserve https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87897189&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/2 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000064 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: correct 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Correct, Long narrow lot. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Correct 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Plans drawn are most efficient use of property with least amount of hardcover. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Least hardcore on long narrow lot. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: N/A 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a 69 11/20/23, 3:16 PM Permit List | Citizenserve https://www4.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=87897189&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 2/2 substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Correct 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: N/A 70 71 12101210123123Main Level Floor1' - 5 1/2"Garage Floor0' - 0"Upper Level Floor10' - 4 5/8"Main Level Clg9' - 6 5/8"Upper Level Clg18' - 5 3/4"8'-1 1/8"8'-1 1/8"NEW ADDITIONEXISTING EXST'G ASPHALTSHINGLESEXST'G ASPHALTSHINGLESEXST'G ASPHALTSHINGLESEXST'G ASPHALTSHINGLESNEW ASPHALT SHINGLESTO MATCH EXST'GNEW ASPHALTSHINGLES TOMATCH EXST'GEXST'G SIDINGEXST'G SIDINGEXST'G SIDINGEXST'GSIDINGNEW SIDINGTO MATCH EXST'GNEW SIDINGTO MATCHEXST'GMain Level Floor1' - 5 1/2"Garage Floor0' - 0"Upper Level Floor10' - 4 5/8"Main Level Clg9' - 6 5/8"Upper Level Clg18' - 5 3/4"8'-1 1/8"8'-1 1/8"FV EXST'GFV EXST'GMATCHMATCHNEW SIDINGTO MATCH EXST'GNEW SIDINGTO MATCH EXST'GNEW SIDINGTO MATCH EXST'GEXST'GSIDINGEXST'GSIDINGMain Level Floor1' - 5 1/2"Basement Level Clg0' - 7 1/2"Garage Floor0' - 0"Upper Level Floor10' - 4 5/8"Main Level Clg9' - 6 5/8"Upper Level Clg18' - 5 3/4"8'-1 1/8"8'-1 1/8"NEW ADDITIONEXISTING EXST'G ASPHALTSHINGLESEXST'G ASPHALTSHINGLESNEW ASPHALT SHINGLESTO MATCH EXST'GNEW ASPHALTSHINGLES TOMATCH EXST'GEXST'G SIDINGEXST'G SIDINGNEW SIDINGTO MATCH EXST'G 1/4" = 1'-0"A11FRONT ELEVATIONOFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.comSHEET NO.DATE: DRAWN BY: c 2023 BEHR DESIGN, INC. THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC. PROJECT FILE: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED, LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A1Ext ElevationsBrent Walton Residence 2405 Dunwoody Avenue Orono, MN las 10/17/2023 23-CL PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION(FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY) 1/4" = 1'-0"A12LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A13REAR ELEVATION72 24'-0"24'-0"3A312'-0"12'-0" STRIP FOOTING2'-0" x 8"d CONT.STRIP FOOTING2'-0" X 8"d CONT.24"X24"X12"dCONC. PILE CAPEXST'G FOUNDATIONEXST'G FOUNDATION24'-0"4'-0" X 1'-8"4'-0" X 1'-8"NEW 16'-0" X 8'-0" OVHD DOOR NEW ADDITIONEXISTING 12'-0"12'-0"24'-0"24'-0"EXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'GEXST'G HOUSEEXST'G GARAGE(2) 2x10's(HDR)(2) 2x10's(HDR)(2) 13/4"x117/8"d LVL (HDR) FLOOR LINEABOVEFLOOR LINEABOVE5" CONC SLABNEW GARAGE5" CONC SLABREMOVE EXST'GWALLREMOVE EXST'GWALL3A3OFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.comSHEET NO.DATE: DRAWN BY: c 2023 BEHR DESIGN, INC. THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC. PROJECT FILE: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED, LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A2Ext ElevationsBrent Walton Residence 2405 Dunwoody Avenue Orono, MN las 10/17/2023 23-CL PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION(FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY) 1/4" = 1'-0"A21FOUNDATION PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A22MAIN FLOOR PLAN73 24'-6"NEW ADDITIONEXISTING EXST'GEXST'GEXST'G18"d ROOM-IN ATTICROOF TRUSS @ 24" O.C. 18"d ROOM-IN ATTIC ROOF TRUSS @ 24" O.C. VERIFY EXST'G NEW24'-0"24'-0"4'-0"16'-0"4'-0"(3)2'-6"x4'-0"NEW GIRDER TRUSSROOF TRUSSES@ 24" O.C.(3) 2x10's(HDR)(2) 2x10's(HDR)(2)2'-6"x4'-0"(2) 2x10's(HDR)18"d ROOM-IN ATTICROOF TRUSS @ 24" O.C.NEW GIRDER TRUSS 6'-6 1/4"( VERIFY & MATCH WIDTH OF EXST'G)10'-11 1/2"6'-6 1/4"(3)2'-6"x4'-0"6'-9" WALL HT.6'-9" WALL HT.6'-9" WALL HT.6'-9" WALL HT.NEW ADDITION EXISTING3" / 12"3" / 12"10" / 12"10" / 12" 3" / 12"3" / 12" 10" / 12"10" / 12" 10" / 12"10" / 12" VERIFY EXST'GVERIFY EXST'G VERIFY EXST'GVERIFY EXST'G VERIFY EXST'GVERIFY EXST'GMATCH EXST'G MATCH EXST'GMATCH EXST'GMATCH EXST'G Garage Floor0' - 0"8" CONC FNDN WALL24" X 8" d CONT. STRIP8"4'-0"SEE STRUCTURL FOR REINFORCINGAND SCREW ANCHOR INFORMATION12" CONC FNDN WALL24" X 12" d CONT. STRIP4'-0"1'-0"6"8"SEE STRUCTURL FOR REINFORCINGAND SCREW ANCHOR INFORMATION5" STRUCTURAL SLAB; SEE STRUCTURAL FOR REINFORCING6 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER w/ 12" LAP OVER 4" CLEAN GRANULAR FILLOFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.comSHEET NO.DATE: DRAWN BY: c 2023 BEHR DESIGN, INC. THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC. PROJECT FILE: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED, LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A3Floor & Roof PlansBrent Walton Residence 2405 Dunwoody Avenue Orono, MN las 10/17/2023 23-CLNOTES:1.) ALL BRG. HEADERS ARE TO BE (2)-2x10 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO).2.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL WINDOW & DOOR SIZES.3.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO SPEC. ALL FLOORING MATERIAL.4.) OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS.5.) ALL BRG WALL WINDOW & DOOR OPNG'S WIDER THAN 60" REQUIRE (2) TRIMMERS MIN. UNDER EA. SIDE OF HEADER.6.) (FL) - FLUSH BEAM, (DR) DROPPED BEAM7.) ALL HEADERS ARE DROPPED UNLESS NOTED (FL)8.) USE ENERGY HEEL HEIGHT ON ROOF TRUSSES.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION(FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY) 1/4" = 1'-0"A31UPPER FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"A32Roof Plan 1/2" = 1'-0"A33Cross Section @ Foundation74 Main Level Floor1' - 5 1/2"Basement Level Clg0' - 7 1/2"Garage Floor0' - 0"Upper Level Floor10' - 4 5/8"Main Level Clg9' - 6 5/8"Upper Level Clg18' - 5 3/4"8'-1 1/8"8'-1 1/8"Main Level Floor1' - 5 1/2"Basement Level Clg0' - 7 1/2"Garage Floor0' - 0"Upper Level Floor10' - 4 5/8"Main Level Clg9' - 6 5/8"Upper Level Clg18' - 5 3/4"8'-1 1/8"8'-1 1/8"Main Level Floor1' - 5 1/2"Basement Level Clg0' - 7 1/2"Garage Floor0' - 0"Upper Level Floor10' - 4 5/8"Main Level Clg9' - 6 5/8"Upper Level Clg18' - 5 3/4"8'-1 1/8"8'-1 1/8" OFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.comSHEET NO.DATE: DRAWN BY: c 2023 BEHR DESIGN, INC. THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC. PROJECT FILE: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED, LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A4Existing ElevationsBrent Walton Residence 2405 Dunwoody Avenue Orono, MN las 10/17/2023 23-CL 3/16" = 1'-0"A41FRONT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"A42LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"A43REAR ELEVATION75 UP20'-0"7'-0"15'-0"15'-0"15'-0"4'-0"6'-0"5'-0"2'-4"3'-6"7'-4"VERIFY9'-2"6'-4"OFFICE: (952) 746-7702 | FAX: (952) 746-7703 CELL: (952) 994-6682 | E-MAIL: mikeb@behr-design.comSHEET NO.DATE: DRAWN BY: c 2023 BEHR DESIGN, INC. THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN LAYOUT IS PROTECTED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. IT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM BEHR DESIGN, INC. PROJECT FILE: BEHR DESIGN, INC. NOR ITS EMPLOYEES ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND/OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNERS OR DRAFTSPERSONS ARE NOT ENGINEERS. BEHR DESIGN, INC. RECOMMENDS THAT A QUALIFIED, LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BE RETAINED TO INSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ALL BUILDINGS. BEAMS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY AND SHOULD BE SIZED BY THE MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERING STAFF AND/OR A LICENSED ENGINEER. SIZES OF MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS REFLECT ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND IN NO WAY INDICATE A SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER, UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT. IN THE CASE OF DOORS AND WINDOWS, GENERIC SIZES ARE SPECIFIED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE SUPPLIER WILL BID AND USE THE CLOSEST SIZE AVAILABLE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR HOMEOWNER SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CHECKING AND VERIFICATION OF DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND NOTES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SPECIFICATIONS, STRUCTURAL AND/OR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND CONFORMITY TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, LAWS AND ORDINANCES. HOMES WHICH ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY SEISMIC, WIND, SNOWFALL, COLD OR FLOOD ISSUES SHOULD BE ENGINEERED AND INSPECTED BY A CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR CONDITIONS OF THAT REGION. THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BEHR DESIGN, INC., SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BEHR DESIGN, INC. OR THE CLIENT FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED FOR.A5Existing PlansBrent Walton Residence 2405 Dunwoody Avenue Orono, MN las 10/17/2023 23-CL 3/16" = 1'-0"A51Existing Foundation Plan 3/16" = 1'-0"A52Existing Main Floor Plan 3/16" = 1'-0"A53Existing Upper Floor Plan 1/8" = 1'-0"A54Existing Roof Plan76 77 78 e . O ' Y O O 9e - CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL L9kESH04 NO. e 4 5 6 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (A & B) SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1, 2 AND 3 FILE NO. 2276 VVHEREAS, Brent Walton and Julie Walton (hereinafter "the applicants") have an interest in the property located at 2405 Dunwoody Avenue owned by Louis B. Oberhauser hereinafter "the owner") within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: see E chibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 18, 1997, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivisions 6 (A & B) and Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1, 2 and 3 to permit a new residence on a vacant lot of record. Variances are requested to allow a reduction of lot area of 12,745.5 sq. ft. where 21,730 sq. ft. is required, and a lot width variance to allow a lot width of 50' where 100' is required. A hardcover variance to allow 43.15% or 3,810 sq. ft. where 25% or 2,207.5 sq. ft. is allowed is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2276. 2.The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one-half acre or 21,730 sq. ft. is the minimum lot azea. The property consists .29 acres or 12,754.5 sq. ft. Page 1 of 7 79 O ' V O O e. - C ITY of ORONO G'' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3956 kESH04 NO. 3.The Orono Plaruling Commission reviewed this application on August 18, 1997 and recommended approval on a vote of 4 to 3. 4.The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The lot is an existing lot of record. B. The lot is 12,754.5 sq. ft. or .29 acres. It does not meet the minimum lot area requirements of the LR-1C district. C. This is an unusual shaped parcel as it is situated in relation to Shoreline Drive and Dunwoody Avenue and Lake Minnetonka. D. The amount of hardcover for the long driveway and turnaround are due to the access being provided from Dunwoody Avenue and the need for safe ingress/egress. 4.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect tra c conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 7 80 i . O ' V O O d.- CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L L kESH 4 NO. s s CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivisions 6 (A & B) and Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1, 2 and 3 to pemut construction of a new residence on a vacant lot where the minimum lot area and lot width are not met and to allow 43.15% (3,810 sq. ft.) of hardcover where none is existing and 2,207.5 sq. ft. (25%) is allowed. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1.The structural lot coverage shall not exceed 1,913.17 sq. ft. (15%). 2.Applicants to provide easement to the City of Orono for the sanitary sewer as described in Exhibit B. Said easement to be executed upon closing of the purchase of 2405 Dunwoody Avenue. 3.Applicants to relocate the water line following approval of the building plans and prior to approval of the building pernlit and installation of footings. 4.A 20' x 20' paved area for vehicles to turnaround to discourage backing out onto Dunwoody Avenue shall be installed. 5.No hardcover shall be allowed in the 0-75' setback. 6.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 8, 1998). 7.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 7 81 O ' V O O b. - C ITY of ORONO ti G' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 9kESH 4 NO. 3 . s 8.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby aa ee to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 8th day of September, 1997. A T: c orothy M. al in, City Clerk Gabri , Jabbour, Mayor f Loui erhaus r,pr perty Owner T c Brent Walton, Applicant J , ie Walton, Applicant STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument as acknowledged before me on this 8th day of September, 1997 by Gabriel Jabbour and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. z. . /LINDA S.VEE 1G iF NOTARY PUBLIC-rdINNESOTA Notary Public HENNEPINCOUNTY My Commission Expires Jan.31,2000 t::.,:::.,c Page 4 of 7 82 O ' V O O b - CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL kESHOg' NO. e 9 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this -+ti day of S'h-r 199'7 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared -e nf F{,„ . m r;a . known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. CAROLE A HASEMAN kOTARY C7J`L'Cc.CJ •PUBI C-MINNESOTA HENNEPIN ourm NOTARY PUBLIC f,. MY CommisSion Cpir Jan.31,2 00 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this f day of ,,P,,,,,ti,199 7 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared S,/; , ;c /-r" , n-,:r r, . known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. CAROLE A.HASEMAN dNOTAAYPUBUC-MINNESOTA o ,1 's` HENNEPlN COUNTY s`- My Commissicn Expires Jan.31,2 00 NOTARY PUBLIC t c..r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HEI NEPIN ) / t On this ._ day of CJC,-d 6 e/ 199` before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared o u;'s . Dh r h s e , S 9 f kno n to me to be the person(s) described in and w-ho executed the foregomg instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. LINDA S.VEE NOTARY PUBLIGfdiNNESOTA 7 CL : HENNEPIN COUNTY ty Commission Expires.Jan.31,2000 NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 7 83 c f - y G-1 1 0 f 39 6 c sc - aThat p tf ot La#2, B odc s, 'cwns te of l.angdon Park*desc Ibed as fc fcrvsrs: ., im npontmthe Jicrtheasb,arty o sa d Lot 2 drsfiant 5.(feet sot theasterly fr n ti eHoeastcomerosafdLot2;th e nc e g 0''Y R'a et vvfitt.the so eas et#neofsaEdLot2otEteshoeo#Lalce Al f n n a#o fi ka;th e r t c e ne of safd Lot 2•t t en c e no th a a r g said sasterty afong sair SttectostEasbefycomerotsaid o#2; thence n oi sald lot 2 to e po#nt of b inning. a 9 Thfs surv y shows the {option of P oPosed house, 9ara9e atNd drive:.on the abo ..;- : ed 4a t mett#s. P oct show any o#her oy er»ettts or ` o f, ; ._ °den on marfcers SCALE hereb certif• that this sur•e} was prepared b me ur under m direct super- /% 2Q,vision,and that I am a duly registered Civil Er ineer and Land SurveYor under the taws of the State oE iinnesota.a tF. 2 9-9T j JB NO.Mark S. Grocrberg titinnesuta License \u r I275 9T-z 9 84 b. Sanitary Sewer Easement Description for Brent Walton 3 9 5 6inLot2, Block 8, Townsite of Langdon Park Hennepin County, Minnesota August 25, 1997 A 20 foot easement for anitary sewer purposes over, under and across fh'at part of'the following described property: That part of Lot 2, Block 8, Townsite of Langdon Park,.described as follows: Beginning at a point of Northeasterly line of said Lot 2 distant 5.00 feet soutFieasterly from the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; th ence southwesterly parallel with the Southeasterly line ' of said Lot 2 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence southeasterly along said shore to = the Southeasterly line of said Lot 2; thence northeasterly along said Southeasterly line to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence northwesterly along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 2 to the point of beginning. which lies within 10 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence southwesterly along the southeasterly line of said Lot 2 a distance'of 220.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line being describ`ed; thence no thwesterly'deflecting right 61 deg'rees 30 minutes'to'its' intersection with the northviresterly line of the above described:property, and said centerline there ending. 85 588484 97-2 7 9 86 87 17 17-117-23 33 0038 TODD HOVREN 3916 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0039 SPRAY ISLAND LLC C/O MICHAEL LEWIS 3924 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0040 JOHN P KASTER 3932 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0043 CHRISTOPHER C ALBERTSON 3900 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0142 THOMAS TRUDEL 3910 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0143 WILLIAM J LEE/SUZANNE K LEE 3914 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0146 ANTHONY J ZECHMANN 3900 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0147 JEFFREY S GARBERG 3902 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0148 VINCENT K BURNHART 3904 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0149 RANDY A SCHUFT 3906 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 18-117-23 44 0025 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 300 S 6TH STREET MC228 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 17-117-23 33 0004 EDWARD J & MARSHA J HELD 3890 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0005 DAVID UMBEHOCKER 3860 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0006 BARBARA S HENSLEY 3850 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0007 DOGHAVEN LLC 3800 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0151 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 300 S 6TH STREET MC228 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 17-117-23 34 0086 CITY OF ORONO 2750 KELLY PKWY ORONO MN 55356 38 20-117-23 21 0001 MARGARET ANN PROEHL 2464 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 21 0002 AMY MARIE STEELE GAYLORD 2001 LAKESIDE LANE MOUND MN 55364 38 20-117-23 21 0018 CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 2420 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 22 0001 CORTLAND W SMITH 4100 SHORLINE DR. SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 20-117-23 22 0002 JAMES D BEDELL P O BOX 33 MOUND MN 55364 38 20-117-23 22 0003 BRADLEY MILLER 3905 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 20-117-23 22 0004 JESSE E SATER 3895 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 22 0005 ALEXANDER DZURIK BENJAMIN DZURIK 4109 NORTH SHORE DRIVE ORONO MN 55364 38 20-117-23 22 0006 T M GREGORY & T A GREGORY 1885 STEIGER LAKE LA VICTORIA MN 55386 38 20-117-23 22 0007 CAMPSMITH PROPERTIES LLC 13815 RIDGEDALE DRIVE MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 20-117-23 22 0008 BRENT D WALTON 2405 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 22 0009 JEAN WALSH 2425 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 22 0010 JAMES C BEISE 2435 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 88 38 20-117-23 22 0011 MARK N & SANDRA K SCHUEHLE 2445 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 22 0012 JAMES C BEISE 2435 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 22 0013 DOUGLAS R UMBEHOCKER 4785 WILSHIRE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 38 20-117-23 22 0014 NIH HOMES LLC 6840 213TH AVE NW ELK RIVER MN 55330 38 20-117-23 22 0015 WILLIAM P/GEORGETTA G HICKEY 2485 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 22 0016 W P HICKEY & G G HICKEY 2485 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 89 He nn epin Co u n ty L oc ate & N o tify Map 240 5 D u nwoo d y Ave 0 100 20050 Feet Da te : 11 /14/2 023 Buffer Size:500Map Co mm e nts : Th is d ata (i) is furn ish ed 'AS IS' with no represen ta tion as tocompleteness or accuracy; (ii) is fu rn ish ed with n o warra nty of anykind; an d (iii) is n ot suitable for le ga l, eng ineerin g or surve yingpurposes. Hennepin County shall not b e liab le for a ny da ma ge , in ju ryor loss resu lting from this dat a. Fo r mo re inf ormation , co nta ct Hen ne pin Co un ty GI S Off ice300 6th S tree t So uth , Minn ea polis, MN 5 5487 / gis.in fo@h en ne pin.us 90 Item No.: 4.3 Date: January 16, 2024 Presenter: Natalie Nye Presenter: Planner Section:Public Hearings Title: LA23-000065, Eskuche Design, 4423 North Shore Drive, Variances 1.Purpose: The review of an application for an average lakeshore setback variance and bluff setback variances for the construction of a new home. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received on December 13, 2023 and considered to be complete on December 26, 2023. Therefore the 60-day application review deadline is February 24, 2024. 3.Background: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new home in a similar location. The subject property is a lake lot with bluffs present along the southern and western property line. The existing home encroaches into the average lakeshore setback and into the bluff impact zone and bluff setback. The proposed home requires variances from average lakeshore setback and from bluff setbacks in order to be built in a similar location. Due to the sensitivity of the bluff, Staff does not support the application as applied. The applicant’s choice of home design, location, and amenities lead to further encroachments within the bluff setback and bluff impact zone and are out of convenience for the chosen home design. The staff report attached as Exhibit A contains a full background and detailed analysis. 4.Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends denial of the application as applied due to the sensitivity of the bluff. Staff is supportive of the average lakeshore setback variance and the need of a driveway within the bluff setback. The Commission should direct the applicant to make modifications to the proposal in order to reduce the impact to the bluff. Planning Commission Action Requested: The Planning Commission should deny the application as applied. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A - Staff Report Exhibit B - Application Exhibit C - Practical Difficulties Form Exhibit D - Narrative Exhibit E - Proposed Survey Exhibit F - Existing Survey Exhibit G - Plans Exhibit H - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit I - Neighbor Acknowledgement Forms 91 Exhibit J - Bluff Encroachments Exhibit K - Mailing List & Map 92 Date Application Received: 12/13/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 12/26/2023 60-Day Review Period Expires: 02/24/2024 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: January 16, 2024 Subject: LA23-000062, Peter Eskuche, 4423 North Shore Drive, Variance, Public Hearing Background The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new home in a similar location. The subject property is a lake lot that also fronts on a channel. The property contains bluffs along the lake and channel frontages. The subject property is subject to lake setbacks along the southern and western property lines as well as bluff setbacks. There are two different bluff setbacks from the top of the bluff, a 20-foot bluff impact zone and a 30-foot bluff setback. No structural improvements are permitted in either setback. The existing home is nonconforming as parts of the home and driveway are located within the bluff setback and within the bluff impact zone. The average lakeshore setback is determined by the neighbor to the east and is a flat setback of 107.6 feet. The existing home encroaches into the average lakeshore setback on both the south and western areas of the home. The proposed home requires an average lakeshore setback variance due to the proposed placement. The proposed home has been pulled farther away from the bluff, but still encroaches into the bluff setback. The proposed driveway, patio, and other improvements are located within the bluff impact zone and bluff setback and require variances. Due to the sensitivity of the bluff, Staff does not support the application as applied. The applicant’s choice of home design, location, and amenities lead to further encroachments within the bluff setback and bluff impact zone and are out of convenience for the chosen home design. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the physical constraints of the lot as practical difficulties resulting in a small building envelope. The subject property is constricted by the existing bluffs along the lake and channel. The existing home encroaches into both the bluff setback and bluff impact zone. The existing home was built in the 1950’s and the property owners desire a modern home on the property. There is also an existing steep driveway of 10- 12.5% grade. The steep driveway along the edge of the bluff is dangerous. The average lakeshore setback on the property is determined by the only neighbor to the east. The flat Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home within the average lakeshore setback and building and hardcover encroachments within a bluff impact zone and bluff setback. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial of the variances as applied. 93 LA23-000062 January 16, 2024 Page 2 of 6 setback measurement of 107.6’ coupled with the required bluff setback of 30 feet from the top of bluff create a very small building envelope making up about 10% of the entire lot size to be considered buildable. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff finds that the bluffs present on the property and the required average lakeshore setback creates a limited building envelope. Staff is supportive of the average lakeshore setback variance seeing that the proposal should not impact lake views for the neighbor and they have submitted a letter of support. Furthermore, the proposed home is located at a similar distance to the existing home and therefore not increasing the average lakeshore setback encroachment. Staff recognizes that the existing home is nonconforming and encroaching into the bluff. Due to the sensitive nature of the bluff, staff does not support any portion of the new home to be located within the bluff setback. All other improvements such as retaining walls, patios, and walkways are also prohibited from being located within the bluff impact zone or bluff setback. Allowing these improvements would require grading and construction activity in a protected area which is not permitted by the City Code. Staff recognizes the need to access the property and can support a minimal driveway in the bluff setback and impact zone, similar to what exists today. However, due to the sensitive nature of the bluff and the numerous improvements within the bluff (highlighted in Exhibit J), bluff impact zone, and bluff setback, the proposal as applied is not supported. The applicant’s choice of home design, location and amenities lead to new encroachments within the bluff setback and bluff impact zone and are out of convenience for a chosen home design. The applicant should redesign the project to a new location or smaller footprint to meet the needs of the property. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350– Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear (Street) 30’ 212’ 202’ Side (East) 10’ 62’ 23.6’ Lakeshore 75’ 95.6’ 95.7’ Bluff Building Setback 30’ from Top of Bluff 18’ 28’ Bluff Impact Zone 20’ from Top of Bluff 18’ 28’ Average Lakeshore 107.6’ Not Met (95.6’) Not Met (95.7’) Section 78-350 – Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140’ Actual 65,801 (1.5 acre) 585’ @ 75’ / 705’ @ OHWL Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 65,801 s.f. (1.5 acres) Allowed: 13,160.2 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,541 s.f. (3.9%) Proposed: 4,555 s.f. (6.9%) 94 LA23-000062 January 16, 2024 Page 3 of 6 Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 65,801 s.f. 16,450.25 s.f. (25 %) 7,495 s.f. (11.39%) 9,291 s.f. (14.12%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variances (Section 78-1279) The property is subject to a flat measurement average lakeshore setback that is determined by the neighboring property to the east. The 107.6-foot setback must be met along the lakeside as well as the channel side. The existing home does not meet the average lakeshore setback requirement as parts of the home to the south and west encroach. The proposed new home will be at its closest point 95.7 feet from the OHWL. This is a similar encroachment to the existing home. Staff is supportive of an average lakeshore setback variance that allows for a home to be constructed with a similar encroachment to what exists today. Bluff Setback (Section 78-1279) The City Code prohibits the construction of buildings or structures within 30 feet of a top of bluff. The code also defines the most sensitive area as a bluff impact zone, which is defined as 20 feet from the top of bluff. No buildings, structures, or grading is permitted within 20’ of the defined top of bluff. Regulations are in place to protect bluffs in order to reduce the risk of slope failure and minimize erosion and sediment in the waterways. The subject property has existing improvements within the bluff impact zone and in front of the bluff setback line. The proposed project will continue to have portions of the new home within the 30-foot bluff setback and improvements such as a driveway, patio, retaining walls, and walkways within the 20-foot bluff impact zone. The new home will require substantial grading within the sensitive bluff to construct a home with a walkout basement in the proposed location. While staff recognizes the need to access the property and can support a driveway within the bluff setback and impact zone, portions of the home and accessory structures and amenities like patios and walkways should not be in the bluff setback. Furthermore, grading in the bluff is not permitted and if necessary, should be limited and the proposal indicates excessive grading to support the desired home design. Staff is not supportive of the requested bluff variances as applied. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the 95 LA23-000062 January 16, 2024 Page 4 of 6 affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variance is not in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed home and accessory structures are located within the bluff impact zone of 20 feet and bluff setback of 30 feet. Further expansion into the bluff is not permitted and not supported by practical difficulties. This criterion is not met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances are not consistent with the comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan emphasizes the protection of natural resources including our natural waterways. The bluff setbacks protect sensitive slopes and prevent erosion. The variances further disturbs and build within a bluff impact zone and bluff setback and are not consistent with the comprehensive plan. This criterion is not met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The construction of a new larger home that requires substantial grading in the bluff is unreasonable and excessive. This criterion is not met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The location of the property and the existing property have not been created by the current homeowner. This criterion is met. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance if approved would further disturb the sensitive bluff area, which may negatively impact the slope and Lake Minnetonka. This criterion is not met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single-family residence is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The special conditions of the property including the topography and proximity to the lake and channel are unique to the subject property. While the property is unique and constrained by a small building envelope, the bluff area should be protected as best as possible. This criterion is not met. 96 LA23-000062 January 16, 2024 Page 5 of 6 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The physical conditions of the lot are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The property owner has the right to maintain the nonconforming home and rebuild it in-kind. An average lakeshore setback variance for a new home can be supported due to parcel acting as a peninsula by abutting the channel. However, the sensitive nature of the bluff requires a design that is compatible with the land. Excessive grading and new improvements in the bluff setback are not supported. This criterion is not met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances would be contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. This criterion is not met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The setback variance to construct within a bluff impact zone and bluff setback is not necessary. The proposed home should be designed so that it does not encroach into the bluff setbacks and there is minimal grading necessary. No accessory structure such as patio, walkway or retaining wall should be located within the bluff setback or bluff impact zone. While an average lakeshore setback variance can be supported, the number of new improvements based on the home design and grading within the bluff area is excessive and out of convenience to the applicant not necessary for use of the site. This criterion is not met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Engineer Comments The City Engineer has not reviewed the proposed plan. A thorough review will be conducted at the time of building permit. Public Comments Neighbor support letters have been provided from the neighbors at 4415 North Shore Drive and 4425 North Shore Drive. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Commission find the proposed improvements and grading work within the bluff setback to be necessary and reasonable? 3. The Commission should discuss if the property owner has reasonable use of the property. 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning staff recommends denial of proposal as applied. While staff is supportive of requested average lakeshore setback variance, the proposed improvements and grading work within the 97 LA23-000062 January 16, 2024 Page 6 of 6 bluff setback and bluff impact zone cannot be supported. The choice of home design and amenities is out of convenience to the applicant not necessary for the use of the property. The applicant should modify the application to meet the needs and constraints of the property. 98 12/19/23, 11:23 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=14073551&WorkOrder_ID=880…1/1 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:12/13/2023 Address:4423 North Shore DR Orono, MN 55364 Parcel Number:0711723340001 Land Use Number:LA23-000065 Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner Owner:Name: KENNETH PAUL SCHMELING Address: JUDITH A SCHMELING 5115 MINNEAPOLIS AVE Applicant:Name: Peter Eskuche Company: Eskuche Design Address: 18318 MInnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 peter@eskuche.us Contact Information:Associated Contact: KENNETH PAUL SCHMELING Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:New construction single family residence Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 99 12/19/23, 11:24 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=14073551&WorkOrder_ID=880…1/2 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000065 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes, correct 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Yes, correct 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes, correct 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: The steepness of the access to the only conforming building area is very steep. The limited size of the conforming building area on this site is only 10% of the land area. Due to the location of the adjacent home, the average lakeshore setback prevents a reasonable size home within the conforming buildable area. These represent significant practical difficulties not borne by the land owner. Access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems is not relevant. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: This is only for single family use conforming with the zoning ordinance. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: This is only for single family use conforming with the zoning ordinance. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The steepness of the access to the only conforming building area is very steep. The limited size of the conforming building area on this site is only 10% of the land area. Due to the location of the adjacent home, the average lakeshore setback prevents a reasonable size home within the conforming buildable area. These represent significant practical difficulties not borne by the land 100 12/19/23, 11:24 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=14073551&WorkOrder_ID=880…2/2 owner. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Correct, these conditions are unique to this property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Correct 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Correct 101 Re: 4423 North Shore Drive, Orono, MN 55364 Eskuche Design Group Peter Eskuche, AIA 12 December 2023 Variance Application City Planner, Plan Commission and honorable Mayor and Ci ty Council Members. We appreciate your consideration for the variance reque st to permit a replacement home at 4423 North Shore Drive. The variances requested are as follows: 1. Variance of 11.8’ to the average lakeshore setback. (less than current) 2. Grading variance within the bluff impact zone to the west to accommodate a walkout basement and patio which the current home has. 3. Hardcover variance within the bluff impact zone (same as current) 4. Grading variance within the bluff impact zone to redu ce the pitch of the existing driveway from a ~12.5% grade to a safer ~8% grade. The property is located on the east side of the Forest L ake access channel on West Arm. It is a steeply sloped lot, with bluffs (as defined by t he zoning ordinance) to the south towards the lake, and to the west and north-west toward s the channel. Application of applicable average lakeshore and bluff impact zones on this property, creates an oddly triangular-shaped buildable space representing only 10.4% of the lot. This configuration presents a practical difficulty, compelling us to met iculously develop a proposal that most closely aligns with the city's planning guidelines. The existing home is non-conforming as it encroaches int o the bluff impact zones and average lakeshore setbacks in multiple places both for structure and hardcover. The existing structure encroaches as much as 12.3’ into the bluff impact zone. The existing driveway and various pavers have a total of 1,092 squa re feet encroaching into the bluff impact zone. The proposed structure, however, addresse s these concerns by not encroaching into the bluff setback. Notably, the proposed driveway, shared with the adjacent property owner, remains within the existing square footage of encroachment, presenting a reasonable bluff impact proposal. There is no adjacent home to the west as the channel t o Forest Lake forms the entire western boundary of the property. The current adjacen t home to the east, built in 2011, sits 107.6’ from the ordinary high water. According to zoning code, this creates the average lakeshore setback on this property of 107.6’. The propos ed home aligns closely with this setback, encroaching slightly less than the existing structure, with both patios conforming to setback regulations. We have secured the support of the neighboring property owner to the east, ensuring a positive impact on the riparian view shed. This is a reasonable setback encroachment proposal. The current home has a walk-out lower level to the wes t. The proposed home matches the location of the current walk-out very closely, in fact, the walk-out area is narrower than 102 currently. The current home has very low ceilings an d very shallow framing members, typical at the time of its build in 1955. The proposed home, designed to contemporary standards, necessitates grading for a deeper basement structure. This grading addresses a previously filled area, returning it to natural topography. This area was initially filled when the existing home was built to support the elevation of the current walk out basement, as evidenced by the current retaining wall. This wall will be removed and the bluff will be returned to the more natural topography that existed be fore the current home was built. The current home has a dangerously steep driveway with a 10%-12.5% grade where the driveway splits from the shared portion which is used by the property owner to the east. Most cities do not permit a driveway steeper than 10% due to both occupant safety, as well as safety of fire, rescue and first responders. The homeowners are very interested in improving the safety of the driveway as they sadly, h ave personal experience of a dear friend who perished in an automobile accident sliding off an embankment. To improve this condition, the proposed home has been set ~2’ lower than the existing. This allows the driveway to be reduced to an ~8% maxim um grade. In addition, the proposal provides for a shoulder or curbing to be placed o n the bluff side, providing a safer margin between the driveway and the bluff as well as a curb to prevent sliding off. The homeowners are also keenly interested in bluff preserv ation and the driveway and related curbing will be also utilized to capture rainwater an d direct it away from eroding the bluff. Due to the home being set lower on the lot, the home will more naturally integrate into the lot and onto the bluff. This is a reasonable variance to the bluff setback, with a driveway plan that is very close to identical to the current si tuation, but with improvements to the slope of the driveway to make it safer. This is a rea sonable proposal. The proposed pathway to the lakeshore enhances safety b y eliminating a hazardous switchback, providing a wider and safer access route. This is reasonable. We appreciate your careful consideration of this applic ation, recognizing its potential to contribute to the improvement and safety of the communi ty. If you have any questions or require further details, please do not hesitate to contact us. Peter Eskuche Eskuche Design Group 612-296-7575 103 PC Exhibit E104 PC Exhibit F105 18 sq ft BLUFF IMPACT H.C.20.0'30.0'11.9' ALS ENCR.10.0' ALS ENCR.5.9 ' BLUFFENCR.12.3 ' BLU F F ENCR . 9 . 2 ' A L S EN C R . 1 0 . 2 ' AL S ENC R . 1,074 sq ftBLUFF IMPACT H.C. 290 sq ftA.L.S. 85 sq ftA.L.S. 156 sq ft BLUFF SETBACK 104 sq ftA.L.S. 39 sq ftBLUFF SETBACK 1,092 sq ft TOTAL BLUFF IMPACT H.C. 479 sq ft TOTAL AVE. LAKE. SETBACK ENCROACHMENT 195 sq ft TOTAL BLUFF SETBACK ENCROACHMENT 20' BLUFF IMPACT ZONE TOP OF BLUFF 30' BLUFF SETBACK 20' BLUFF IM PACT ZONE 30' BLUFF SETBACK TOP OF BLUFF AVE. LAKE. SETBACK AVE. LAKE. SETBACK 75' LAKE. SETBACK75' LAKE. SETBACK 0 20'40'60'80' 70 60 50 40 30 80 20 10 N W E S 1 EXISTING ENCROACHMENTS CONFORMING BUILDABLE AREA 10.42% NON-CONFORMING AREA 89.58% EXISTING STRUCTURE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNSET WINTER SOLSTICE SUNSET SHEET L1 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 106 1,092 sq ftBLUFF IMPACT H.C.20.0'30.0'2 . 0 ' A L S EN C R . 6 sq ftA.L.S. 1,092 sq ft TOTAL BLUFF IMPACT H.C. 455 sq ft TOTAL AVE. LAKE. SETBACK ENCROACHMENT 0 sq ft TOTAL BLUFF SETBACK ENCROACHMENT 20' BLUFF IMPACT ZONE TOP OF BLUFF 30' BLUFF SETBACK 20' BLUFF IM PACT ZONE 30' BLUFF SETBACK TOP OF BLUFF 6.5' ALSENCR.11.1' ALSENCR.11.8' ALSENCR.449 sq ft A.L.S. AVE. LAKE. SETBACK AVE. LAKE. SETBACK 75' LAKE. SETBACK75' LAKE. SETBACK 0 20'40'60'80' 70 60 50 40 30 80 20 10 N W E S 1 PROPOSED ENCROACHMENTS PROPOSED STRUCTURE CONFORMING BUILDABLE AREA 10.42% NON-CONFORMING AREA 89.58% SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNSET WINTER SOLSTICE SUNSET SHEET L2 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 107 20.0'3.5 ' O. H .8.3'O.H.8.3 ' O. H . 6.0 ' O. H .95.7'30.0'7.8'O.H.9.3'O.H.1 0 5 . 5 ' 950.8' 962.0' 954.0' 962.0' 960.0' 957.0' 962.0' 961' 951.5' 958.0'961.5' 960' 958'958.0' REBUILD SHED IN KIND EXISTING WALL & STEPPERS TO REMAIN NEW CONC CURB COVERED DECK NEW STEPSEXTEND EXISTING PATH REMOVE LOWER PATH AND RESTORE PATIO 951.0' PATIO 962.5' PATIO 962.5' 954 958 960 956 952 952 954 954 956 958 960 956 950 8.5% 8.7% A.C. 20' BLUFF IMPACT ZONE TOP OF BLUFF 30' BLUFF SETBACK 20' BLUFF IM PACT ZONE 30' BLUFF SETBACK TOP OF BLUFF 96.5'101.1'EXISTING DRIVEWAY GRADE 12.5% PROPOSED M.L. SUBFLOOR = 963.0' L.L. SLAB = 951.56' GAR. SLAB = 962.0' AVE. LAKE. SETBACK AVE. LAKE. SETBACK 75' LAKE. SETBACK75' LAKE. SETBACK 0 20'40'60'80' 70 60 50 40 30 80 20 10 N W E S 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN w/DEMO UNDERLAY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED SHOWN AS RED SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNSET WINTER SOLSTICE SUNSET SHEET L3 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 108 20.0'3.5 ' O. H .8.3'O.H.8.3 ' O. H . 6.0 ' O. H .95.7'30.0'7.8'O.H.9.3'O.H.1 0 5 . 5 ' 950.8' 962.0' 954.0' 962.0' 960.0' 957.0' 962.0' 961' 951.5' 958.0'961.5' 960' 958'958.0' REBUILD SHED IN KIND EXISTING WALL & STEPPERS TO REMAIN NEW CONC CURB COVERED DECK NEW STEPSEXTEND EXISTING PATH REMOVE LOWER PATH AND RESTORE PATIO 951.0' PATIO 962.5' PATIO 962.5' 954 958 960 956 952 952 954 954 956 958 960 956 950 8.5% 8.7% A.C. 20' BLUFF IMPACT ZONE TOP OF BLUFF 30' BLUFF SETBACK 20' BLUFF IM PACT ZONE 30' BLUFF SETBACK TOP OF BLUFF 96.5'101.1'PROPOSED M.L. SUBFLOOR = 963.0' L.L. SLAB = 951.56' GAR. SLAB = 962.0' AVE. LAKE. SETBACK AVE. LAKE. SETBACK 75' LAKE. SETBACK75' LAKE. SETBACK 0 20'40'60'80' 70 60 50 40 30 80 20 10 N W E S 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNSET WINTER SOLSTICE SUNSET SHEET L4 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 109 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-4½" APPROX. SF = 2,011 FINISHED + 1,289 UNFIN + 858 LOWER GARAGE LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET A1 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 110 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-5⅛" APPROX. SF = 3,299 FINISHED (INCL. PORCH) +858 GARAGE + 577 COVERED PATIO + 289 COVERED ENTRY + 83 COVERED GRILL MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET A2 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 111 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 8'-7⅛" APPROX. SF = 1,562 FINISHED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN CLIENTSHEET A3 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 112 L.L. SLAB 951.6' -11'-5 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 963.0' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +20'-7" L.L. SLAB 951.6' -11'-5 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 963.0' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +20'-7"10'-0"28'-1" BUILDING HEIGHT<30'-0" MAX.13'-7 3/4"LOWEST PROPOSED GRADE 951.1' REFERENCE LINE HIGHEST EXISTING GRADE 965.0' ROOF DEFINED (TOP OF CORNICE) 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 2 WEST ELEVATION 1 NORTH ELEVATION SHEET A4 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 113 L.L. SLAB 951.6' -11'-5 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 963.0' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +20'-7" METAL VERTICAL LOUVER SCREEN L.L. SLAB 951.6' -11'-5 1/4" M.L. SUBFLOOR 963.0' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +20'-7"15'-10 3/8"12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 2 EAST ELEVATION 1 SOUTH ELEVATION SHEET A5 VARIANCE 21 DEC 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2023 SAGA HILL RESIDENCE 4423 N. SHORE DR. ORONO, MN 55364 952-476-2679 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 114 Date: Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 4423 North Shore Drive Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist 10/13/2021 In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) SB Job Number: 19295-022 Prepared by: EMW Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One) Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER B Covered Porch 167 C Shed (in setback)48 (Example) (Garage) (24' x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 2,326 F Pavers (in setback)9 G Retaining Wall 312 D Bituminous 3609 E Pavers 865 J K H Retaining Wall (in setback)471 I N O L M R S P Q V W T U Z (1) Total Existing Hardcover 7,807.00 X Y Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): F Retaining Wall (not in setback)312 (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 312 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)]7,495.00 (4) Total Lot Area 65,801 Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)]11.39% 115 Date:Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3Tier 4Tier 5S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.%This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail.(3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)]9,291.00(4) Total Lot Area65,801Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)]14.12%(2) Total Excludable Hardcover100Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684):JNew Retaining Wall41GExisting Retaining Wall59Z(1) Total Proposed Hardcover9391XYVWTURSPQNProposed Side Driveway864OProposed New Conc. Curb112LProposed Grill Deck83MProposed Side Patio404JNew Retaining Wall368KExisting Pavers42HRetaining Wall (in setback)190IProposed Driveway/Sidewalk2142FPavers (in setback)9GExisting Retaining Wall44DScreen Porch274EBack Patio578BStoop294CShed (in setback)48(Example)(Garage)(24' x 30')(720 S.F.)ANew House & Garage3,939In the following table, identify all items of Proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict Proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion.Key to SurveyHardcover Item (Describe)Length x Width Total (Square Feet)SB Job Number:19295-022 Prepared by: BRVStormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One)Step 1: Proposed HARDCOVERCity of OronoHardcover Calculation WorksheetProperty Address: 4423 North Shore DrivePrepared By: Sathre-Bergquist 12/11/2023 116 117 118 From:Chris Twomey To:Natalie Nye Subject:Schmeling Home Plans Date:Thursday, December 21, 2023 2:26:47 PM Natalie, the Twomeys who live at 4415 North Shore Drive enthusiastically support the home plans which the Schmeling’s shared with us. Chris and Darla Twomey Sent from my iPad 119 - Top of Bluff- Bluff Impact Zone 20'- Bluff Setback 30'- Top of Bluff- Bluff Impact Zone 20'- Bluff Setback 30'Highlighted areas - improvements and grading within the bluff, bluff impact zone, and bluff setbackPC Exhibit J120 38 07-117-23 31 0001 JOHN O'NEILL/LAUREN O'NEILL 4445 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0002 GREGG DANIEL KLOHN 4455 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0003 CHARLES WILLARD SANVIK 4465 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0004 JOHN D & DEBRA M KNODEL 4485 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0005 MICHAEL P RYAN 4495 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0013 LEBRISIA IVERSEN ANDREW IVERSEN 4448 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0035 ERIC MEISEL AMY YANIK MEISEL 1355 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0039 JOSEPH W LOMA 4460 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0041 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 300 S 6TH STREET MC228 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 07-117-23 34 0001 KENNETH PAUL SCHMELING JUDITH A SCHMELING 5115 MINNEAPOLIS AVE MINNETRISTA MN 55364 38 07-117-23 34 0002 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FACILITIES SERVICES 300 S 6TH STREET MC 228 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 07-117-23 34 0003 KATHARINE STOLTENBERG SCOTT M ALBRECHT 4425 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 34 0004 TODD O LUNDMAN 4435 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0004 DAVID R YANIK 1345 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0009 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 42 0010 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 42 0024 MARK ALBRECHT & GRACE MEYER 4330 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0030 JOHN R CHERBA 1350 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0031 RYAN BEDUHN & ANDREA BEDUHN 1340 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0034 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 42 0037 THOMAS EDMUND LINDER 1360 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0039 KIRSTEN SUNGAARD-RIISE JAN RIISE 4340 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0040 BARBARA JEAN SCHOENING 4380 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 42 0041 DANIEL P HOLLERMAN 1375 VINE PL MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0017 CHRISTOPHER A TWOMEY DARLA R TWOMEY 16743 W LOMA VERDE TRAIL SURPRISE AZ 85387 38 07-117-23 43 0018 ANDREW H SCHMIDT JAMIE L LOHR 4395 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0031 NICHOLAS SUMMERS 4365 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 43 0032 CHARLES TYE 4345 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 121 He nn epin Co u n ty L oc ate & N o tify Map 442 3 N o rth Shor e Dr 0 200 400100 Feet Da te : 12 /13/2 023 Buffer Size:500Map Co mm e nts : Th is d ata (i) is furn ish ed 'AS IS' with no represen ta tion as tocompleteness or accuracy; (ii) is fu rn ish ed with n o warra nty of anykind; an d (iii) is n ot suitable for le ga l, eng ineerin g or surve yingpurposes. Hennepin County shall not b e liab le for a ny da ma ge , in ju ryor loss resu lting from this dat a. Fo r mo re inf ormation , co nta ct Hen ne pin Co un ty GI S Off ice300 6th S tree t So uth , Minn ea polis, MN 5 5487 / gis.in fo@h en ne pin.us 122 Item No.: 4.4 Date: January 16, 2024 Presenter: Natalie Nye Presenter: Planner Section:Public Hearings Title: LA23-000066, Hendel Home, 2605 Mapleridge Lane, Variance 1.Purpose: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the renovation of an existing home. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received on December 13, 2023 and considered to be complete on January 2, 2024. The 60-day review deadline will expire on March 2, 2024. 3.Background: The applicant is proposing to raise the roof by approximately 1 foot in order to update insulation and adhere to energy code. The applicant is also proposing an addition on the lakeside of the home underneath an existing deck. The proposal also includes two new deck stairs. These elements require a variance from the average lakeshore setback as the existing home is nonconforming with the average lakeshores setback line bisecting the home. 4.Staff Recommendation: Staff finds that the request is modest and is supported by practical difficulty. Planning Staff recommends approval of the request average lakeshore setback variance as applied. Planning Commission Action Requested The Planning Commission should motion to recommend approval of the variance application as applied. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A - Staff Report Exhibit B - Application Exhibit C - Practical Difficulties Form Exhibit D - Narrative Exhibit E - Proposed Survey Exhibit F - Existing Survey Exhibit G - Site Plan Exhibit H - Plans Exhibit I - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit J - Neighbor Support Letters Exhibit K - Address List & Map 123 Date Application Received: 12/13/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 01/02/2024 60-Day Review Period Expires: 03/02/2024 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Natalie Nye, Planner Date: January 16, 2024 Subject: #LA23-000066, Andy Corbin w/ Hendel Homes, 2605 Mapleridge Lane Variance - Public Hearing Background The applicant is proposing to construct an addition and remodel an existing home on the property. The existing home is nonconforming with the average lakeshore setback line bisecting the home. The proposed renovation would elevate the roof by approximately 1 foot in order update insulation. This increase in height would create a new vertical expansion into the average lakeshore setback. There is also a proposed addition underneath an existing deck and two new deck stairs that require a variance from the required setback. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has indicated the existing home was constructed prior to the average lakeshore setback regulations. The location of the home as it relates to the neighboring homes is unique. The proposed addition underneath the deck and the addition of two new deck stairs is minimal and does not impact any neighboring views of the lake. The proposed raised roof is also minimal in order to achieve energy code compliance. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant’s assessment. The existing home does not meet the average lakeshore setback. Any increase in height to the home would require a variance. The increase of less than a foot to a one-story home is minimal. Staff also finds the proposed addition underneath the existing deck and two new deck stairs to be a modest request that does not impact the lake views that the neighbors currently enjoy. Per Code, the existing home could be rebuilt in kind, and staff finds the proposed remodel and addition to be reasonable and in character with the neighborhood. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 & 78-1279 – Setbacks: LR-1B District Required Existing Proposed Rear (Street) 30’ 120’ 120’ East Side 10’ 90’ 90’ West Side 10’ 38’ 38’ Lakeshore 75’ 103’ 94’ Average Lakeshore Not Compliant Not Compliant Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance in order to construct an addition and remodel an existing home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. 124 FILE #LA23-000066 January 16, 2024 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-330 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1B District Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (1 acre) 140’ Actual 82,241 s.f. (1.89 acres) 175’ @ 75’ / 195’ @ OHWL Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 82,241 s.f. (1.89 acres) Allowed: 16,448.2 s.f. Existing: 4,255 s.f. Proposed: 5,089 s.f. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 82,241 s.f. 20,560.25 s.f. (25%) 10,650 s.f. (12.95%) 11,858 s.f. (14.42%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variances (Section 78-1279) The current home on the property is not complaint with the average lakeshore setback regulation with the average lakeshore setback line going through the middle of the home. The applicant is proposing to raise the roof of the existing one-story home approximately 1 foot. This roof increase is due to an upgrade in insulation that will bring the home into energy code compliance. The applicant is also proposing an addition on the lakeside of the home underneath an existing deck and two new deck stairs. The increase in overall height of the home and the new additions are new protrusions in the average lakeshore setback and require a variance. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The existing home on the lot does not conform with the average lakeshore setback. The average lakeshore setback line currently bisects the home. The proposed project increases the height of the home by about a foot and includes an addition underneath an existing deck and two new deck stairs. 125 FILE #LA23-000066 January 16, 2024 Page 3 of 4 The proposed project is modest and does not impact the neighboring views of the lake. The proposed renovation of the existing home is in harmony with the general intent of the Ordinance due to the practical difficulties present. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The renovation of an existing single- family home is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified the necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. The proposal will meet all of zoning requirements. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The renovation of an existing single-family home is a reasonable use of the property. The proposed changes are minimal. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The existing home location is not the result of the current property owner’s actions; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance resulting in the renovation and addition to an existing home is supported by practical difficulties and will not alter the character of the area. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The location of the existing home on the lot and the relation of the lot to the neighboring homes is unique and specific property. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The unique and existing conditions do not apply to other land or structures in the neighborhood or district. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The existing home is in a nonconforming location. The proposal 126 FILE #LA23-000066 January 16, 2024 Page 4 of 4 will maintain a similar lake setback. Granting the average lakeshore setback allows the property owner to renovate and add on a modest addition to the existing home. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. The proposed home will not impact any currently enjoyed views of the lake by neighboring properties. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The average lakeshore setback variance allows the existing home to be raised approximately a foot for better insulation and energy code compliance. The variance also allows an addition underneath an existing deck on the lakeside of the home and two new deck stairs. These improvements create new expansions within the average lakeshore setback since the existing home does not comply with the setback. The proposed improvements to the home are modest and minimal in nature to achieve a modernized home. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant has provided neighbor support letters from both the neighbor to the east (2610 Mapleridge Lane) and the neighbor to the west (2665 Mapleridge Lane) found in Exhibit J. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance request as applied. 127 12/18/23, 10:44 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=14073771&WorkOrder_ID=880…1/1 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:12/13/2023 Address:2605 Mapleridge LN Orono, MN 55331 Parcel Number:2111723210005 Land Use Number:LA23-000066 Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner Owner:Name: ERIC H PAULSON Address: - Dianna Zuendel Applicant:Name: Andy Corbin Company: Hendel Homes Address: 15250 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata , MN 55391 acorbin@hendelhomes.com Contact Information:Associated Contact: Brooks Borrell brooksborrell@gmail.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:Remodel Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 128 12/18/23, 10:46 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=14073771&WorkOrder_ID=880…1/2 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000066 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The request to permit the addition below the deck, deck stairs, and adding to the height of the roof within the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable considering the orientation of the neighboring homes with respect to the lakeshore vegetation screening, topography, and adjacent properties. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The current owners did not build the home and it was built before the average lakeshore ordinance was established. The circumstances are unique to this property based on the neighboring home locations and the unique nature of the lakeshore shape. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The variance will not alter the character of the locality. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations were not considered as a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: This condition is not applicable. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: This condition is not applicable. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The home location and existing design does not permit construction of addition under the deck and allow access from deck stairs. Adding height to the roof is being done to increase from the 129 12/18/23, 10:46 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=14073771&WorkOrder_ID=880…2/2 current 1” of insulation. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The unique shoreline shape and placement of the neighboring homes does not apply to all homes in the neighborhood. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The applicant’s submitted information supports the request for average lakeshore setback variance, and they have indicated it is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Granting of the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The property has an existing deck that the addition would be built below, and new deck stairs would be used to access grade. The new roof height is only to add to the current insulation and bring it closer to code compliant. 130 Justification for Variance Requests To Orono City Staff, Planning Commission and City Council, I am writing to provide some rationale for the variance requests pertaining to a proposed additions at 2605 Maple Ridge Lane. The current owners did not build the home and it was built before the average lakeshore (ALS) ordinance was established. The circumstances are unique to this property based on the neighboring home locations and the unique nature of the lakeshore shape. The request to permit the addition below the deck, deck stairs, and adding to the height of the roof within the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable considering the orientation of the neighboring homes with respect to the lakeshore vegetation screening, topography, and adjacent properties. The addition below the deck and deck stairs will not increase any visible height to the current property. The request to add height to a section of the home is to increase the insulation from 1-1/2” to 10” and better comply with energy codes. The current neighbors have reviewed and approved the variance requests. In summary, we believe that our variance requests are reasonable, given the existing conditions posed by a unique lot configuration and home that was built before ALS. We respectfully request that the city weigh these factors in favor of our proposal and grant the required variance. We appreciate your valuable time and consideration in granting this variance. 131 PC Exhibit E132 PC Exhibit F 133 Concrete Paver Driveway Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Concrete Paver Driveway 946.15 (942.8)946GARAGE FLOOR=943.1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR=942.8 946 948945.7 944.7 946 948 (EX.=942.7) Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 15119 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Telephone 952 475 1229 Facsimile 952 475 1667 D E S I G N · B U I L D Landscape Architecture ZB RESIDENCE2023-12-8 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Architect Name date:0000/00/00 reg. no.00000 date: revisions: drawn: Preliminary Landscape Site Plan L-1 TI 2605 Mapleridge LaneOrono, MN 553312023-12-19 2023-12-28 PC Exhibit G 134 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:51 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0", 1/32" = 1'-0", 1' = 1'-0" Lower Level Floor Plan - Existing ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING AE1.0D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 Bedroom/Gym 13'-2" x 13'-8" CARPET Water Services 8' x 8'-5" 2 Car Garage 23'-4" x 21'-8" Laundry 7'-2" x 6'-9" Service Area 7'-4" x 15'-8" U/Stairs Storage 10'-6" x 4'-5" Bedroom 2 10'-10" x 13'-5" Bath. 2 6' x 8'-1" Wine Room 10'-10" x 7'-11" Powder 8'-6" x 6'-5" Sh. 2'-8" x 3' Linen 6'-7" x 2'-8" Bar 11' x 11'-1" Family Room 22'-6" x 15' STONE TILE 4 Season Porch 21'-10" x 11'-9" STONE TILE Pool Terrace 56'-3" x 37'-5" CHEVY SUBURBAN JEEP CHE R O K EE Gym Hall 8'-6" x 6'-9" Cedar Closet 8'-11" x 5'-4" 3'-21/4"2'-6"6'-9"2'-4"1'-2"63'-41/2"18'-31/2" 12'-9"4'-0"4'-3"2'-51/2"5'-25/8"0'-3"3'-4"0'-31/2"0'-4"0'-31/2"11'-10" SOFFIT (DROP) SUMP & RADON SOFFIT 11 1/2" SOFFIT (DROP) SOFFIT HEATER 24" BEV. FRIDGE15" ICE MAKERMICROWAVE24" DISHWASHER DRAWER 36"H. COUNTER 42 1/2"H. COUNTER FURNACE BOILER ELECTRICAL PANEL /BREAKER WATER SOFTENER SOFFIT SOFFIT SOFFIT DECK ABOVE (DASHED) 7'-8 3/4" 7'-10 3/4" 6'-9 1/4" 6'-9" 7'-6 1/2" 8'-6 1/2" 7'-10 1/4" 7'-0" 7'-10" 9'-1" 7'-10 1/4" 7'-11 3/4" 8'-0 3/4" 7'-11 3/4" 5'-1" 7'-11 1/4" 7'-3" 8'-9" 7'-11 1/4" 7'-11 1/4" 7'-3 1/4" GAS METER CONC. WALL CMU. WALL BOILER UTILITY SINK DECK ABOVE (DASHED) EPOXY OVER CONCRETE +/- 3'-8" LOW WALL +/- 3'-8" LOW WALL 943.3 STUCCO WALL STUCCO WALL 945.1 945.6 942.7 GRAVEL BELOW DECK GRAVEL BELOW DECK APPROX. DISTANCE 942.8 942.8 6'-2" FLOATING COPPER HEARTH GLASS BLOCK GLASS BLOCK GLASS BLOCK LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) 8'-10" LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) 6'-9 3/4" 6'-9 3/4" 7'-5 1/4" LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) CMU. WOOD BEAMSWOOD BEAMS LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) 3'-3 1/2" CONCRETE STEPS CONCRETE PAVER DRIVEWAY LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY)7'-11 1/4" WASHER DRYER LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) HEADER ELECTRIC AL PANEL SOFFIT (SLAB TO JOIST) JOISTS (2x10)JOISTSJOISTS(2x10)UP UP 17 R. @ 6 3/4" 16 T. @ 12" DN UP UP CANTILEVER UP 8 R. @ 7 1/4" 7 T. @ 12" 8 R. @ 7 7/8" 7 T. @ 12" 8 R. @ 7" 7 T. @ 12" 4 R. @ 7" 3 T. @ 12" UP 17 R. @ 6 3/4" 16 T. @ 12" 4 R. @ 7" 3 T. @ 12" 2 R. @ 6 1/4" 1 T. @ 11 3/4" DN 1 AE2.0 2 AE2.1 2 AE2.0 FIREPLACE T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - PORCH 90'-1 1/8" (943.00 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - PORCH 90'-1 1/8" (943.00 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL) Mechanical/Storage 7'-10" x 23'-3" CONCRETE W.C. 3'-1" x 3'-3" W.C. 3' x 3'-2"39'-7"4'-3"4'-9"12'-51/2"2'-4"84'-31/4" 39'-111/2"4'-93/4"10'-9"4'-01/4"16'-0"8'-83/4"1'-41/4"4'-1"9'-81/4"24'-61/4"8'-111/4"12'-4"1'-71/4"6'-41/2"0'-11"1'-71/4"4'-01/4"9'-81/4"10'-9" 84'-31/4" 9'-9"1'-2"3'-21/4"4'-69/16"2'-315/16"2'-6"2'-5"1'-1"21'-0"1'-1"2'-51/4"4'-911/16"4'-69/16"4'-313/16"1'-2"17'-113/16" 0'-51/2"2'-6"16'-8"5'-4"0'-4"4'-0"M.O.SUMP PUMP 7'-4 1/2" ELECT. METER FLUE STUCCO WALL EXISTING - STUCCO WALL FINISH +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL 945.4 +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL 6'-11" CONCRETE STEPS IPE WOOD TREADS IPE WOOD TREADS CONCRETE STEPS +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL FURNACE WATER HEATERS OPEN TO ABOVE CARPETCONCRETECARPET CONC. CARPET STONE TILE WOOD STONE TILE CARPET TILE CARPET STONE TILE TILE STONE TILE CONCTILEAVE R A G E L A K E S E T B A C K 1 AE2.1 Lower Level Gross A: 3,344.23 sq ft Lower Level Finished A: 2,300.46 sq ft 2,985.01 S.F. 4,636.44 S.F. 2,300.46 S.F. 3,344.23 S.F. 1,005.00 S.F. 1,252.98 S.F. 5,285.47 S.F. 9,233.65 S.F. N W E SWinterSummerSummerWinter SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"2 Area Calcs Lower Level - Existing MAIN LEVEL EXISTING: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: LOWER LEVEL EXISTING: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: DETACHED GARAGE EXISTING: GARAGE ONLY: GROSS AREA: GRAND TOTAL FINISHED: GRAND TOTAL GROSS: AREA CALC ULATIONS : PC Exhibit H 135 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:51 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0", 1/32" = 1'-0", 1' = 1'-0" Main Level Floor Plan - Existing ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING AE1.1D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 Bedroom 1 15'-10" x 11'-5" Closet 1 5'-3" x 7'-9" Ln 1'-8" x 3'-3" Office 16'-3" x 11'-1" Primary Bedroom 20'-3" x 16'-6" Pri. Dr. 1 8'-10" x 10'-4" Pri. Dr. 2 8'-11" x 10'-4" Primary Bathroom 22'-6" x 10' Entry Foyer 10'-6" x 5'-4" Bath. 1 12' x 7'-5" W.C. 2'-10" x 3'-3"Shower 4'-2" x 2'-9" Pri. Hl. 3'-5" x 10'-10" 1 AE2.0 2 AE2.1 2 AE2.0 50'-91/4"2'-21/4"2'-21/4"39'-7"4'-3"4'-9"1'-11"1'-1" 4'-8"14'-31/4"23'-31/2"0'-41/2"2'-4"7'-81/4"3'-2"9'-31/2"2'-6" 3'-51/4"3'-71/4"0'-41/2"0'-41/2"0'-41/2"0'-41/2"0'-41/2"0'-41/2" 1'-1" 14'-81/2"18'-03/4"2'-31/4"0'-31/2" 2'-31/4"0'-7"2'-31/4"0'-7"2'-31/2"0'-31/2" 3'-5"14'-8"24'-61/4"1'-1" 4'-1"10'-13/4"3'-0"12'-41/2"4'-01/2"4'-11"15'-31/2" 9'-81/2"6'-11"9'-01/4"15'-111/4"4'-8"6'-0"0'-51/2" 2'-61/8" 0'-31/4"4'-0"8'-83/4"2'-21/4"0'-6"6'-3"6'-0"9'-71/2"3'-2"M.O.14'-113/4" 8'-5" 8'-5 1/4" 8'-7 1/4" 7'-8" 8'-3 1/2" 7'-5" 7'-5" 7'-5" 8'-11" S.L. 6'-8" S.L. 7'-2" S.L. 7'-2" S.L. FLOATING STONE HEARTH GAS FIREPLACE HEADER CONCRETE STEPS CONCRETE PAVER DRIVEWAY STAINELSS STEEL HEARTH LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) PAVERS GAS METER WOOD BEAMS WOOD BEAMS WOOD BEAMS WOOD BEAMS WOOD BEAMS GRAVEL/ROCKS REMOVE EXISTING COUNTERTOP & LEGS POT FILLER EXISTING DOWNSPOUT EXISTING DOWNSPOUT DN DN 8 R. @ 7 7/8" 7 T. @ 12" DN 2R. DN DN DISHWASHER ICE MAKER DOUBLE OVENS DN 17 R. @ 6 3/4" 16 T. @ 12" 17 R. @ 6 3/4" 16 T. @ 12" DN 8 R. @ 7" 7 T. @ 12" 4 R. @ 7" 3 T. @ 12" DN 8 R. @ 7" 7 T. @ 12" 9'-6 1/2" S.L.9'-6 1/2" S.L.9'-6 1/4" S.L.9'-6 1/4" S.L. 6'-11" S.L. 7'-6 1/4" S.L. 6'-10 3/4" B.O.B. 7'-2" S.L.7'-2" S.L. 9'-7 1/2" S.L.9'-7 1/2" S.L. 8'-0" S.L.10'-10 1/2" S.L. 7'-8" S.L.7'-7 3/4" S.L. 7'-7 3/4" S.L. 8'-5" S.L. 8'-0" S.L.8'-0" S.L. 8'-0" S.L. 8'-0" S.L. T.O. FLOOR FINISH 95' 6 3/8" (948.44 CIVIL) T.O. FLOOR FINISH 100' 0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. DECK 99'-10 5/8" (952.80 CIVIL) T.O. FLOOR FINISH 100' 0" (952.91 CIVIL) REF/FRZR K-5931-4UExecutive ChefSinksKohler Cast Iron Kitchen 13'-10" x 9'-8" Living Area 25'-10" x 20'-3" Dining 15' x 14'-1" TILEVanity Area 5'-4" x 10' Shower 5'-6" x 4'-9" W.C. 5'-6" x 4'-8" Covered Entry Area 15'-7" x 13'-8" Pool Terrace 56'-3" x 37'-5" A2.1 3,4 1 AE2.1 84'-31/4" 2'-6"28'-01/4"18'-03/4"14'-81/2"20'-113/4" 84'-31/4"1'-41/4"13'-91/4"24'-61/4"8'-111/4"6'-11/4"1'-3"9'-4"0'-37/8"1'-47/8" 4'-5"1'-51/2" 11'-11"3'-3"14'-8"1'-0"13'-43/8"12'-0"3'-93/8"5'-33/4"9'-6" 0'-31/2" 12'-71/2"3'-0"5'-41/4"6'-8"3'-0"3'-3"0'-5"0'-41/4" 0'-1"2'-5"0'-7"2'-5"0'-7"2'-5"0'-71/4" 2'-5"0'-31/2" 6'-3"2'-10"14'-11/2"2'-9"17'-10"2'-01/2"4'-3"4'-9"10'-53/4"0'-111/2"2'-2" FIREPLACE 7'-8" S.L. CONCRETE STEPS IPE WOOD TREADS IPE WOOD TREADS FLUE LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) A/C UNIT A/C UNIT GRAVEL/ROCKS ELECT. METER 65" TV EXISTING DOWNSPOUT BENCH8 R. @ 7 1/4" 7 T. @ 12" CARPET WOOD CARPET WOOD STONEWOODSTONETILETILE STONE TILE STONE TILECARPETTILECARPETWOOD WOOD DECK CARPETWOODDECKAVE R A G E LAKE SETB A C K Main Level Gross A: 4,636.44 sq ft Main Level Finished A: 2,985.01 sq ft 2,985.01 S.F. 4,636.44 S.F. 2,300.46 S.F. 3,344.23 S.F. 1,005.00 S.F. 1,252.98 S.F. 5,285.47 S.F. 9,233.65 S.F. N W E SWinterSummerSummerWinter SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"2 Area Calcs Main Level - Existing MAIN LEVEL EXISTING: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: LOWER LEVEL EXISTING: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: DETACHED GARAGE EXISTING: GARAGE ONLY: GROSS AREA: GRAND TOTAL FINISHED: GRAND TOTAL GROSS: AREA CALC ULATIONS : 136 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:51 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0", 3/32" = 1'-0", 1' = 1'-0" Detached Garage Floor Plans - Existing & Proposed ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING AE1.2D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 JEEP CHEROKEEJEEP CHEROKEEDetached Garage 18'-9" x 28'-8" Detached Garage 20'-1" x 18'-9" CONCRETE B.O. TRUSS 1 AE2.2 2 AE2.2 3 AE2.2 4 AE2.2 40'-1" 39'-91/2"0'-31/2"30'-13/4"8'-103/4"2'-4"9'-11"8'-0"1'-0"14'-81/4"3'-4"1'-111/2"8'-9"2'-7"8'-93/4"10'-0"20'-13/4"10'-0"1'-0"19'-11/2" 8'-0"8'-0"0'-7"0'-31/2"1'-0"1'-0" +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL HIGH WINDOWS VERTICAL WOOD SIDINGVERTICAL WOOD SIDING 8'-4" CONCRETE REMOVE PLANTER BOX 15" HACKBERRY TREE 10" OAK TREE 20" PINE TREE CUT ALL OVERHANG RAFTERS & ROOF CLEAN CONCRETE FOR REFINISH CONCRETE APRON0'-10"0'-2"8'-0"0'-2"0'-10"2'-51/2" 0'-2" 16'-0" 0'-2" 1'-4" CONCRETE PAVER JEEP CHEROKEEJEEP CHEROKEEDetached Garage 18'-9" x 28'-8" Detached Garage 20'-1" x 18'-9" EPOXY OVER CONCRETE 1 AE2.2 2 AE2.2 3 AE2.2 4 AE2.2 NEW PLANTER BOX NEW GARAGE DOOR NEW GARAGE DOOR NEW GARAGE DOOR NEW DOOR CONCRETE APRON Detached Garage Finish A: 1,005.00 sq ft Detached Garage Gross A: 1,252.98 sq ft Detached Garage Finish A: 1,005.00 sq ft Detached Garage Gross A: 1,252.98 sq ft 2,985.01 S.F. 4,636.44 S.F. 2,300.46 S.F. 3,344.23 S.F. 1,005.00 S.F. 1,252.98 S.F. 5,285.47 S.F. 9,233.65 S.F. 2,987.19 S.F. 4,772.79 S.F. 2,600.12 S.F. 4,178.37 S.F. 1,005.00 S.F. 1,252.98 S.F. 5,587.31 S.F. 10,204.14 S.F.NWESWinterSummer SummerWinter SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 Detached Garage Floor Plan - Existing SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 Detached Garage Floor Plan - Proposed SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"4 Area Calcs. Detached Garage - Proposed SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"3 Area Calcs. Detached Garage - Existing MAIN LEVEL EXISTING: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: LOWER LEVEL EXISTING: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: DETACHED GARAGE EXISTING: GARAGE ONLY: GROSS AREA: GRAND TOTAL FINISHED: GRAND TOTAL GROSS: AREA CALCULATIONS : MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: LOWER LEVEL PROPOSED: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: DETACHED GARAGE PROPOSED: GARAGE ONLY: GROSS AREA: GRAND TOTAL FINISHED: GRAND TOTAL GROSS: AREA CALC ULATIONS : 137 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:51 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0" Exterior Elevations - Existing ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING AE2.0D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 20238'-103/8"11'-61/4"PARTIALLY REMOVE LOW WALL ABOVE DECK REMOVE AND RECONFIGURE AS NEEDED REMOVE ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS & REPLACE WITH SIMILAR SIZE WHERE INDICATED REMOVE STEP & PAVER PATH CLEAN ALL BRICK & GROUT FOR REFINISH RECONFIGURE FLUES AS NEEDED FOR NEW FIREPLACES PATCH BRICK AS NEEDED REMOVE LIGHT & PATCH BRICK AS NEEDED REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE DOOR & REPLACE REMOVE RETAINING WALL & RELOCATE PATCH AS NECESSARY REMOVE AND SALVAGE BRICK AS NEEDED REMOVE & RECONFIGURE AS NEEDED CUT ALL OVERHANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PARAMETER REMOVE ALL ROOF EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL DECKING REMOVE & REPLACE GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT REMOVE STAIRS AND PARTIALLY REMOVE WALL, TO KEEP UNDER DECK WALL FOR SUPPORT & INSTALL NEW RAILING T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. EXISTING ROOF 111'-6 1/4" T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - ENTRY STAIR LANDING 95'-6 3/8" (948.44 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL)1'-83/4"8'-103/8"11'-61/4"CUT ALL OVERHANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PARAMETER INVESTIGATE THE EXTENT OF THE WATER LEAK/STAINS /DAMAGE HERE & FIX INSPECT FLASHING & REPLACE AS NEEDED RECONFIGURE FLUES AS NEEDED FOR NEW FIREPLACES REMOVE ALL ROOF EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL DECKING REMOVE AND REPLACE GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT PARTIALLY REMOVE LOW WALL ABOVE DECK REMOVE ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS AND REPLACE WITH SIMILAR SIZE WHERE INDICATED REMOVE AND RECONFIGURE AS NEEDED CLEAN ALL BRICK & GROUT FOR REFINISH T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. EXISTING ROOF 111'-6 1/4" T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 South Exterior Elevation - Existing SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 West Exterior Elevation - Existing 138 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:52 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0" Exterior Elevations - Existing ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING AE2.1D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 20238'-103/8"11'-61/4"REMOVE AND SALVAGE BRICK AS NEEDED REMOVE AND RECONFIGURE RAILING AS NEEDED PATCH BRICK AS NEEDED REMOVE LIGHTS & PATCH AS NECESSARY CLEAN BRICK & GROUT FOR REFINISH RECONFIGURE FLUES AS NEEDED FOR NEW FIREPLACES REMOVE ALL ROOF EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL DECKING CUT ALL OVERHANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PARAMETER REMOVE EXISTING GUTTER REMOVE LIGHTS & PATCH AS NECESSARY PARTIALLY REMOVE LOW WALL ABOVE DECK REMOVE & RECONFIGURE RAILING AS NEEDED PARTIALLY REMOVE WALL, TO KEEP UNDER DECK WALL FOR SUPPORT & INSTALL NEW RAILING T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL) T.O. EXISTING ROOF 111'-6 1/4" (964.43 CIVIL) REMOVE & RELOCATE DOWNSPOUT REMOVE ALL EXISTING EXTERIOR DOORS REMOVE & REPLACE GUTTERREMOVE ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS & REPLACE WITH SIMILAR SIZE WHERE INDICATED REMOVE RETAINING WALLS AND PLANTING BED FILL REMOVE RETAINING WALLS AND PLANTING BED FILL REMOVE RETAINING WALLS AND PLANTING BED FILL REMOVE RETAINING WALLS AND PLANTING BED FILL PATCH OPENING AS NEEDED PATCH BRICK AS NEEDED REMOVE & REPLACE EXTERIOR WINDOWS AS INDICATED ON FLOOR PLAN REMOVE ALL ROOF EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL DECKING RECONFIGURE FLUES AS NEEDED FOR NEW FIREPLACES CUT ALL OVERHANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PARAMETER REMOVE ALL EXISTING DOORS & REPLACE WITH SIMILAR SIZE REMOVE ALL EXISTING WALLS & RELOCATE PATCH AS NECESSARY REMOVE & REPLACE GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 8'-103/8"11'-61/4"REMOVE AND RECONFIGURE AS NEEDED CLEAN ALL BRICK & GROUT FOR REFINISH PARTIALLY REMOVE WALL, TO KEEP UNDER DECK WALL FOR SUPPORT T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. EXISTING ROOF 111'-6 1/4" T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 North Exterior Elevation - Existing SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 East Exterior Elevation - Existing 139 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:52 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0" Detached Garage Exterior Elevations - Existing ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING AE2.2D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 REMOVE LIGHT FIXTURES CUT ALL OVER HANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PERIMETER REMOVE AND REPLACE DOORS CLEAN ALL WINDOW FOR REFINISH CLEAN BRICK & GROUT FOR NEW FINISH REMOVE ALL ROOF EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL DECKING CUT ALL OVER HANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PERIMETER CUT ALL OVER HANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PERIMETER REMOVE ALL ROOF EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL DECKING CLEAN ALL WINDOW FOR REFINISH CLEAN BRICK & GROUT FOR NEW FINISH REMOVE DOORS CLEAN ALL WINDOW FOR REFINISH REMOVE ALL ROOF EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL DECKING CUT ALL OVER HANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PERIMETER CLEAN WOOD FOR REFINISH REMOVE DOOR CLEAN ALL WINDOW FOR REFINISH REMOVE ALL ROOF EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL DECKING REMOVE & REPLACE PLANTER CUT ALL OVER HANG INCLUDING RAFTERS AT ALL PERIMETER CLEAN FOR REFINISH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 North Detached Garage Exterior Elevation - Existing SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 East Detached Garage Exterior Elevation - Existing SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 South Detached Garage Exterior Elevation - Existing SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 West Detached Garage Exterior Elevation - Existing 140 Concrete Paver Driveway Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Concrete Paver Driveway 946.15 (942.8)946GARAGE FLOOR=943.1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR=942.8 946 948945.7 944.7 946 948 (EX.=942.7) Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 15119 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Telephone 952 475 1229 Facsimile 952 475 1667 D E S I G N · B U I L D Landscape Architecture ZB RESIDENCE2023-12-8 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Architect Name date:0000/00/00 reg. no.00000 date: revisions: drawn: Preliminary Landscape Site Plan L-1 TI 2605 Mapleridge LaneOrono, MN 553312023-12-19 2023-12-28 141 Concrete Paver Driveway Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Concrete Paver Driveway Keenan & Sveiven, Inc. 15119 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Telephone 952 475 1229 Facsimile 952 475 1667 D E S I G N · B U I L D Landscape Architecture ZB RESIDENCE2023-12-8 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Architect Name date:0000/00/00 reg. no.00000 date: revisions: drawn: Preliminary Landscape Planting Plan L-2 TI 2605 Mapleridge LaneOrono, MN 553312023-12-19 2023-12-28 142 GSPublisherVersion 1196.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.1/2/2024 1:51 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0", 1/32" = 1'-0", 1' = 1'-0" Lower Level Floor Plan - Proposed ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING A1.0D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 2'-0" x 6'-71/2"3'-0" x 6'-7"3'-41/2" x 6'-71/2"3'-4" x 3'-4" 2'-8" x 6'-9" 2'-10" x 6'-9"3'-0" x 6'-9"3'-0" x 6'-9"2'-8" x 6'-9"2'-8" x 6'-9"3'-0" x 6'-7"19'-9" x 7'-0" 6'-0" x 6'-9" 3'-0" x 6'-9"3'-0" x 6'-9"3'-83/16" x 6'-9"3'-0" x 6'-9"2'-10" x 6'-9"3'-0" x 6'-9"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"2'-8" x 4'-111/8"Pool Terrace 56'-3" x 37'-5" CHEVY SUBURBAN JEEP CHEROKEE Guest Bedroom 22'-7" x 13'-8" G. Cl. 4'-6" x 7'-8" Gym 19'-10" x 12'-8" Mech. 1 7'-10" x 10'Guest Bath 6'-7" x 9'-8" Kitchenette 9'-7" x 13'-8"U/ Stair Storage 10'-6" x 4'-5" Mech. 2 7'-2" x 6'-6" Mud Room 7'-4" x 15'-8" G.B. Sh. 3'-6" x 9'-8" W.C. 4' x 5'-11" Pool Storage 20'-9" x 10'-6" Laundry 9'-6" x 12'-2" Laun. Hl. 4'-6" x 7'-1" 2 Car Garage 23'-4" x 21'-9" Not Used 8' x 8'-5" Entry 8'-4" x 3'-7" 4'-0"11'-8"11'-8"2'-6"2'-6"3'-6"22'-10" 3'-5" 2'-6"2'-6"0'-101/2"SOFFIT HEATER FURNACE BOILER UTILITY SINK SOFFIT DECK ABOVE (DASHED) DECK ABOVE (DASHED) 5'-1" GAS METER CMU. WALL BOILER 5'4x7'0 2'0x1'6 10'1x2'1 8'3x13'0 3'0x3'0 WATER SOFTENER GLASS 6'7x2'1 CONCRETE STEPS DECK ABOVE (DASHED) 943.3 BRICK WALL RAISED PLANTER BED 945.1 945.6 942.7 GRAVEL BELOW DECK CONCRETE PAVER DRIVEWAY NEW STRUCTURAL BEAM ABOVE IF POSSIBLE, MAKE IT FLUSH TO ALLOW MORE ROOM AT GYM NEW STRUCTURAL HEADER LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN SOFFIT (DROP) 7'-6 1/2" 8'-6" EPOXY OVER CONCRETE 7'-8 3/4" 7'-10 3/4" 6'-9 1/4" 6'-9" 7'-0" 9'-1" 7'-10 1/4" 7'-11 3/4" 5'-1" 7'-11 1/4" 7'-3" 8'-9" 7'-11 1/4" 6'-2" 6'-9 3/4" 7'-5 1/4" 3'-3 1/2" 8'-0 3/4" 5'8x2'1 942.8 942.8 REMOVE LOW WALLS AND FILL OF RAISED PLANTERS/ GRAVEL BEDS NEW CONCRETE WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH WALL TO REMAIN REFINISH STUCCO NEW DOOR WALL TO REMAIN REFINISH STUCCO WALL TO REMAIN REFINISH STUCCO WALL TO REMAIN REFINISH STUCCO WALL TO REMAIN REFINISH STUCCO REMOVE LOW WALLS AND FILL OF RAISED PLANTERS/ GRAVEL BEDS NEW CONCRETE FLOOR NEW CONCRETE FLOOR NEW WALL FINISH WITH STUCCO STRUCTURAL POST STRUCTURAL BEAM FILL WITH BRICK EXPOSED BRICK, FURR WALL BELOW BRICK TO COVER EXPOSED FOUNDATION WALL NEW BIFOLD DOORS NEW DOOR ALL DARKER WALLS INDICATE NEW OR PATCH UP WALLS 10X10 WOOD STAGGERED TIMBER RETAINING WALL LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) NEW GARAGE DOOR PATCH CONCRETE & EPOXY FINISH AS NEEDED PATCH WALL FOR NEW OPENING NEW RELOCATED CONCRETE STEPS & RETAINING BRICK WALL NEW RETAINING BRICK WALL PATCH PAVER AS NEEDED HERE (EXISTING RETAINING WALL REMOVAL) MIRRORED WALL NEW STAIRS ABOVE 5'0x1'10 MECH. AREA ABOVE MECH. AREA ABOVE PRICE THIS LIGHTWELL AS AN ALTERNATE 92'-9 5/8" 945.71 92'-9 5/8" 945.71 SOFFIT 92'-9 5/8" 945.71 10X10 WOOD STAGGERED TIMBER RETAINING WALL ELECTRIC AL PANEL 4'2x2'1 11'1x2'1 STORAGE (VERIFY) TOWELS 3'0x5'6 NEW RELOCATED WALL PROPOSED CONCRETE LINE SEPARATION OF EXISTING & NEW CONCRETE 2'0x1'62'0x1'6 4'6x2'1 WOOD BEAMS NEW STAIRS ABOVE JOISTS(2x10)UP 2 R. @ 6 1/4" 1 T. @ 11 3/4" DN DN 1R. QUEEN BENCH DRYER WASHER UP CANTILEVER LIGHT WELL 8 R. @ 7 7/8" 7 T. @ 12"LIGHT WELL20" SINKVANITY UPLIGHT WELL8 R. @ 7 1/4" 7 T. @ 12" UP 4 R. @ 7" 3 T. @ 12" Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. Squeezing point.Keep hands andfingers clear ofthis area. LINEN DRESSER & TV UP 17 R. @ 6 3/4" 16 T. @ 12"BENCH w/HOOKSUP 11 R. @ 7 1/4" 10 T. @ 12" 1 AE2.0 2 AE2.1 2 AE2.0 1'-91/2"2'-4"1'-91/2"8'-51/4"T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - PORCH 90'-1 1/8" (943.00 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - PORCH 90'-1 1/8" (943.00 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL) Rec. Area 22' x 15'-5" Dining Area 21'-1" x 10'-1" STONE TILE G.B W.C. 3' x 9'-8" Pool Shower 7'-8" x 3'-7" Pool Bath 10'-10" x 5'-11" P. Entry 7'-3" x 5'-4"2'-713/16" x 4'-31/4"2'-713/16" x 4'-31/4"2'-713/16" x 4'-31/4"2'-10" x 6'-8"18'-0" x 7'-0" 2'-6" x 6'-8"2'-6" x 6'-9"84'-31/4" 4'-93/4"10'-9"4'-01/4"18'-4"6'-43/4"39'-111/2"39'-7"4'-3"4'-9"5'-51/4"9'-81/4"24'-61/4"11'-11/4"2'-6"2'-6"3'-6" 2'-6"2'-6"3'-6"4'-0"ELECT. METER 42" REF/ FRE. RAISE LOW WALL 12" REFINISH STUCCO 945.4 +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL TO REMAIN REFINISH STUCCO CONCRETE STEPS LOAD BEARING WALL (VERIFY) 6'-9 3/4" WALL TO REMAIN TO SUPPORT DECK NEW WALL, FINISHED WITH VERTICAL WOOD SIDING NEW WALL, FINISHED WITH VERTICAL WOOD SIDING REMAINING WALL REFINISH STUCCO 24" DWTRASH NEW RELOCATED DOWNSPOUT NEW TOWN & COUNTRY T.C. ARCHITECTURAL SERIES 7' FIREPLACE FILL IN OPENING (VERIFY IF POSSIBLE) 75" TV ABOVE FIREPLACE NEW WALL FILL UP WALL GLASS ABOVE 48" H. WALL 2'1x14'11 TRASH 48" GRILL PREP. AREA 949.7 950.0 949.8 949.1 FURNACE WATER HEATERS SUMP & RADON DEMO. STEPS & LEVEL FLOOR50" TV BAR ISLAND STORAGE BELOW BOARD GAMES & BLANKET STORAGE 4'0x6'9 RAISE CEILING (VERIFY) OPEN TO ABOVE KEEP EXISTING STONE FLOOR 6'0x3'0 WINE REFRUBBER EXG. STONE WOODTILEWOOD EXG. STONE CONCRETE EPOXY EXG. STONE TILE EXG. STONECONCRETEEXG. STONERUBBERCONCRETEEPOXYGRIDDLE DRAWER 3'6x1'8 BENCH CONCRETE EXG. STONE CONC.TILETILE EXG. STONE OVEN /MICRO.BENCHEXG. CONC.NEW CONC.1 AE2.1 Lower Level Gross A: 4,178.37 sq ft Lower Level Finished A: 2,600.12 sq ft WINE REF 2,987.19 S.F. 4,772.79 S.F. 2,600.12 S.F. 4,178.37 S.F. 1,005.00 S.F. 1,252.98 S.F. 5,587.31 S.F. 10,204.14 S.F. N W E SWinterSummerSummerWinter SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"2 Area Calcs. Lower Level - Proposed MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: LOWER LEVEL PROPOSED: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: DETACHED GARAGE PROPOSED: GARAGE ONLY: GROSS AREA: GRAND TOTAL FINISHED: GRAND TOTAL GROSS: AREA CALC ULATIONS :GENERAL NOTES : 1. REMOVE ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS & REPLACE WITH ULTIMATE MARVIN WINDOWS OR LOEWEN WINDOWS AS INDICATED ON PLAN AND ELEVATIONS. 2. REMOVE ALL ROOFING MATERIALS EXCEPT STRUCTURAL WOOD DECKING, CUT ALL OVERHANGS INCLUDING RAFTERS & ALL ROOF. CREATE NEW OVERHANG WITH 2X10 OVER THE ROOF DECKING. INSULATE WITH FOAM, THE THICKNESS OF NEW JOIST, ADD 3/4" PLYWOOD & INSTALL. INSTALL HI-TEMP ICE & WATER THE ENTIRE ROOF & FINISH WITH STANDING SEAM ROOF. 3. INSTALL 4" BOARDS BETWEEN ROOF RAFTERS, 3/4" FROM THE BOTTOM OF RAFTERS ON THE UNDERSIDE PART OF THE ROOF AT THE COVERED ENTRY & FILL THE EXISTING OPENING WITH NEW ROOF 4. ALL NEW CABINETRY AT MAIN LEVEL: AT KITCHEN, OFFICE, BATHROOMS VANITIES, LINEN CLOSETS. AT LOWER LEVEL: AT KITCHENETTE, LAUNDRY, BATHROOMS, LINEN CLOSETS, MUD ROOM, REC. AREA. NEW CLOSET PACKAGES AT ALL CLOSETS 143 GSPublisherVersion 1196.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.1/2/2024 1:51 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0", 1/32" = 1'-0", 1' = 1'-0" Main Level Floor Plan - Proposed ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING A1.1D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 2'-10" x 7'-31/2"2'-7" x 6'-9"4'-0" x 1'-7"2'-6" x 5'-73/16"2'-8" x 5'-73/16"2'-8" x 5'-73/16"2'-7" x 6'-9"2'-71/2" x 6'-63/4"3'-0" x 6'-9" 2'-10" x 6'-9"2'-10" x 6'-9" 2'-10" x 6'-9"2'-8" x 6'-9"2'-8" x 6'-81/2"2'-8" x 6'-9"2'-8" x 6'-9"2'-4" x 5'-11"2'-4" x 5'-11"2'-4" x 5'-11" 2'-4" x 3'-81/8"2'-4" x 3'-81/8"2'-4" x 3'-81/8" 4'-0" x 6'-0"4'-0" x 4'-1111/16"4'-0" x 3'-113/8"3'-6" x 6'-9"2'-8" x 6'-9"2'-8" x 6'-9"12'-0" x 6'-63/4"2'-8" x 6'-81/2"4'-51/2" x 6'-9" Cl. 2 5'-7" x 7'-3" Bedroom 2 11'-6" x 11'-2" Hallway 20'-7" x 3'-6" Office 7'-6" x 9'-6"Cl. 1 4'-11" x 7'-3"Bedroom 1 12' x 11'-4" Kitchen Area 17' x 24'-1" Pr. Hers 8'-10" x 10'-4" Pr. His 7'-2" x 10'-4" Primary Bathroom 10' x 12'-7" Pr. W.C. 3'-11" x 7'-8" Pri. Hl. 3'-5" x 10'-10" Pr. Ln. 3'-10" x 6'-2" Entry Foyer 10'-6" x 5'-4" 2'6x4'2 9'9x13'0 1'6x12'0 1 AE2.0 2 AE2.1 2 AE2.0 4'-0"4'-0"4'-01/4"48'-7"50'-91/4"0'-8"6'-83/4"5'-0"8'-9" 1'-55/8" 5'-0"5'-47/8"6'-13/8"5'-61/2" 8'-5" 8'-5 1/4" 8'-7 1/4" 8'-11" S.L. 7'0x5'4 2'0x1'6 2'1x5'4 2'1x3'7 7'0x5'4 2'0x1'6 3'9x14'62'1x3'5 2'1x3'5 2'1x12'9 2'1x11'2 7'0x6'8 1'8x2'6 T.P. STO. REMOVE STAIRS AND FILL IN WITH NEW IPE DECKING OR PRICE AN ALTERNATE TO REMOVE ALL DECK & REPLACE WITH NEW BRICK WALL RAISED PLANTER BED CONCRETE PAVER DRIVEWAY GAS METER HANDRAIL ONLY ON THIS SIDE RELOCATE & RECONFIGURE AS NEEDED FOR ACCESS 2'9x6'8 2'0x2'0 2'0x2'0 SHELVES NEW STRUCTURAL BEAM REMOVE WINDOW & PATCH AS NECESSARY 1'8x2'6 NEW ROOF/OVERHANG WOOD BEAMS NEW WOOD FLOORING ON MAIN LEVEL NEW ROOF/OVERHANG 2'1x5'2 NEW ROOF/OVERHANG NEW ROOF/OVERHANG PRICE THIS LIGHTWELL AS AN ALTERNATE NEW WOOD FLOORING CL 75" TV ABOVE FIREPLACE LOUNGERS NEW HANDRAIL 18" WINE STO. WINTER GRILL RAISE & LEVEL EXISTING FLOOR ADD NEW WOOD FLOOR FINISH REMOVE EXISTING DROP SOFFIT AND & EXTEND WOOD CEILING FINISH EXTEND WOOD BOARD CEILING TO HERE TRANSOM SIZE ABOVE REPLACE EXISTING DOWNSPOUT ADD NEW DOWNSPOUT REPLACE EXISTING DOWNSPOUT REPLACE EXISTING DOWNSPOUT POT FILLER REMOVE STAIRS AND PARTIALLY REMOVE WALL, TO KEEP UNDER DECK WALL FOR SUPPORT & INSTALL NEW RAILING PATCH OR REPLACE DECK AS NECESSARY CEILING RIDGE LINE 2'1x3'0 PROVIDE GAS LINE PATCH OR REPLACE DECK AS NECESSARY NEW RAILING ALL DARKER WALLS INDICATE NEW OR PATCH UP WALLS REMOVE EXISTING HEARTH NEW STAIRS AND HANDRAILS ADJUST WIDTH BETWEEN TWO EXISTING POSTS. REGRADE AROUND, TOTAL MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 30"ADJUST RAILING FOR NEW STAIRS ADJUST RAILING FOR NEW STAIRS DN DN DN DN8 R. @ 7 7/8" 7 T. @ 12" LIGHT WELLLIGHT WELLQUEEN VANITYVANITYQUEEN 36" SINK VANITYTRASHDW48" RANGE36" REF.36" FRID.KING BED ART MAKEUP & VANITYVANITYLIGHT WELLLIGHT WELL 4 R. @ 7" 3 T. @ 12" SHELVES DN DN DN 17 R. @ 6 3/4" 16 T. @ 12" DN11 R. @ 7 1/4" 10 T. @ 12" 2'-8" x 5'-11" 2'-8" x 5'-11"2'-8" x 5'-11" 3'-3" x 7'-61/4" 3'-31/2" x 7'-61/4" 3'-0" x 7'-51/4" 6'-11" S.L. 7'-2" S.L. 9'-7 1/2" S.L. 7'-7 3/4" S.L. 8'-0" S.L.8'-0" S.L. 8'-0" S.L. 8'-0" S.L. T.O. DECK 99'-10 5/8" (952.80 CIVIL) T.O. FLOOR FINISH 100' 0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. FLOOR FINISH 100' 0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. DECK 100'-1 1/4" (952.8 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - ENTRY STAIR LANDING 95'-6 3/8" (948.44 CIVIL) W.C. W.C. W.C. Cl. Pool Terrace 56'-3" x 37'-5" Bath 2 5'-10" x 11'-2" Powder 5'-8" x 11'-3" TILE Bath 1 6'-1" x 9'-6"Dining Area 12'-2" x 16'-11" Living Area 13'-8" x 16'-11" Primary Bedroom 20'-3" x 16'-6" Pr. Sh. 5'-7" x 10' Covered Entry Area 15'-7" x 13'-8" Deck 42'-2" x 12'-6" Deck 35'-6" x 13'-3" Deck 30'-2" x 13'-5" Deck 35'-6" x 13'-3" A2.1 3,4 1 AE2.1 3'-0" x 6'-9"2'-4" x 5'-11"2'-4" x 5'-11"2'-4" x 5'-11"2'-4" x 5'-11"2'-4" x 5'-11"2'-8" x 6'-10"2'-3" x 1'-813/16" 2'-2" x 5'-55/8" 4'-01/2" x 2'-43/16" 2'-3" x 1'-813/16" 2'-2" x 5'-55/8"4'-0" x 5'-55/8"3'-4" x 5'-67/8"3'-41/2" x 2'-711/16"2'-6" x 6'-10"3'-4" x 5'-67/8"3'-41/2" x 0'-113/8"6'-11" x 2'-03/4"8'-83/8" x 2'-01/2"8'-83/8" x 2'-01/2" 20'-103/4" x 6'-11"1'-1"84'-31/4" 84'-31/4"1'-8"2'-4" 1'-111/2" 7'-8" S.L. 2'7x2'7 3'0x10'0 2'2x7'6 2'7x5'0 10'0x14'010'0x14'0 2'7x2'7 SHELVES 2'6x5'0 PLANTING BED ELECT. METER NEW STEPS, ADJUST WIDTH BETWEEN TWO EXISTING POSTS. REGRADE AROUND, TOTAL MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 30" RECONFIGURE FENCE FOR ACCESS CONCRETE STEPS NEW FRONT DOOR VERIFY COLUMN LOCATION VERIFY COLUMN LOCATION TRANSOM WINDOWS SIZES ABOVE EXPOSE EXISTING RAFTERS NEW TILE FLOOR NEW TILE FLOOR A/C UNIT A/C UNIT TRASH RAISE LOW WALL 12" REFINISH STUCCO +/- 3'-0" LOW WALL TO REMAIN REFINISH STUCCO 48" GRILL 10X10 WOOD STAGGERED TIMBER RETAINING WALL 10X10 WOOD STAGGERED TIMBER RETAINING WALL NEW TOWN & COUNTRY T.C. ARCHITECTURAL SERIES 7' FIREPLACE REMOVE EXISTING FIREPLACE TO ALLOW FOR NEW FIREPLACE IN LIVING AREA 65" TV NEW SLIDING DOORS NEW STAIRS 60" GAS TABLE FIREPLACE CL CL CONCRETE STEPS TRANSOM ABOVE (DASHED) ADD NEW DOWNSPOUT ADD NEW DOWNSPOUT NEW STAIRS & RAILING ADJUST RAILING FOR NEW STAIRS REMOVE STAIRS & PARTIALLY REMOVE WALL, TO KEEP UNDER DECK WALL FOR SUPPORT & INSTALL NEW RAILING TRANSOM SIZE ABOVE 8 R. @ 7 1/4" 7 T. @ 12" 43" TV LINEN BENCH 5'7x1'8 STACKED W/D LINEN LINEN 32" TV WOODTILEWOODWOODDECKWOODWOODDECKWOODTILETILE WOOD WOOD DECKWOOD 13 R. @ 6 3/4" 12 T. @ 12"6 R. @ 6 3/8"4 T. @ 12"GRIDDLE DRAWER TILE WOOD FULL HEIGHT CABINET WINE 2'7x5'0 Main Level Gross A: 4,772.79 sq ft Main Level Finished A: 2,987.19 sq ft 2,987.19 S.F. 4,772.79 S.F. 2,600.12 S.F. 4,178.37 S.F. 1,005.00 S.F. 1,252.98 S.F. 5,587.31 S.F. 10,204.14 S.F. N W E SWinterSummerSummerWinter SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"2 Area Calcs. Main Level - Proposed GENERAL NOTES : 1. REMOVE ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS & REPLACE WITH ULTIMATE MARVIN WINDOWS OR LOEWEN WINDOWS AS INDICATED ON PLAN AND ELEVATIONS. 2. REMOVE ALL ROOFING MATERIALS EXCEPT STRUCTURAL WOOD DECKING, CUT ALL OVERHANGS INCLUDING RAFTERS & ALL ROOF. CREATE NEW OVERHANG WITH 2X10 OVER THE ROOF DECKING. INSULATE WITH FOAM, THE THICKNESS OF NEW JOIST, ADD 3/4" PLYWOOD & INSTALL. INSTALL HI-TEMP ICE & WATER THE ENTIRE ROOF & FINISH WITH STANDING SEAM ROOF. 3. INSTALL 4" BOARDS BETWEEN ROOF RAFTERS, 3/4" FROM THE BOTTOM OF RAFTERS ON THE UNDERSIDE PART OF THE ROOF AT THE COVERED ENTRY & FILL THE EXISTING OPENING WITH NEW ROOF 4. ALL NEW CABINETRY AT MAIN LEVEL: AT KITCHEN, OFFICE, BATHROOMS VANITIES, LINEN CLOSETS. AT LOWER LEVEL: AT KITCHENETTE, LAUNDRY, BATHROOMS, LINEN CLOSETS, MUD ROOM, REC. AREA. NEW CLOSET PACKAGES AT ALL CLOSETS MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: LOWER LEVEL PROPOSED: FINISHED AREA: GROSS AREA: DETACHED GARAGE PROPOSED: GARAGE ONLY: GROSS AREA: GRAND TOTAL FINISHED: GRAND TOTAL GROSS: AREA CALC ULATIONS : 144 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:52 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0" Exterior Elevations - Proposed ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING A2.0D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 20238'-103/8"11'-61/4"REFINISH STUCCO TYP. NEW WOOD TRIM AT WINDOWS TYP. NEW STEPS & HANDRAIL. PATCH EXISTING RAILING AS NEEDED PATCH EXISTING RAILING AS NEEDED GRADE AS NEEDED STAIN ALL BRICK TYP. NEW OPEN TOP BONDERIZED SHROUD STAIN ALL MORTAR TYP. NEW WINDOWS LIGHT WELL PATCH BRICK AS NECESSARY NEW LIGHT FIXTURE NEW BOARDS BETWEEN RAFTER PAINTED FINISH NEW WINDOWSNEW WINDOWS NEW NEW LIGHT FIXTURESNEW NEW LIGHT FIXTURES NEW GARAGE DOOR/SIZE PATCH BRICK AS NECESSARY NEW BRICK RETAININGW ALL NEW RECONFIGURED FENCE NEW RETAINING BRICK WALL & CONCRETE STEPS RELOCATED NEW WOOD TRIM AT WINDOWS TYP. ALL NEW EXTERIOR WINDOWS TYP. NEW PERIMETER WOOD BAND TO PATCH CUT RAFTER HOLES NEW INSULATED ROOF SYSTEMNEW STANDING SEAM ROOF NEW GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT NEW GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT NEW GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT NEW VERTICAL WOOD SIDING NEW RAILING & HANDRAIL PATCH WHERE EVER NECESSARY NEW FRONT DOOR T.O. PROPOSED ROOF 112'-4 1/4" T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. EXISTING ROOF 111'-6 1/4" T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - ENTRY STAIR LANDING 95'-6 3/8" (948.44 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL)1'-83/4"8'-103/8"11'-61/4"NEW OPEN TOP BONDERIZED SHROUD STAIN ALL BRICK TYP. NEW STEPS & HANDRAIL. PATCH EXISTING RAILING AS NEEDED GRADE AS NEEDED KEEP PARTIAL WALL FOR DECK SUPPORT REMOVE PART OF WALL PATCH AS NEEDED ALL NEW WOOD TRIM AT WINDOWS TYP. ALL NEW EXTERIOR WINDOWS TYP.NEW RECONFIGURED FENCE REFINISH ALL STUCCO TYP. STAIN ALL MORTAR TYP. NEW WINDOW LIGHT WELLNEW WINDOW LIGHT WELL NEW WINDOWSNEW WINDOWS NEW STAIRS & HANDRAIL. PATCH EXISTING RAILING AS NEEDED NEW GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT NEW GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT NEW VERTICAL WOOD SIDING T.O. PROPOSED ROOF 112'-4 1/4" T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. EXISTING ROOF 111'-6 1/4" T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 South Exterior Elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 West Exterior Elevation 145 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:52 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0", 3/4" = 1'-0" Exterior Elevations - Proposed ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING A2.1D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 20238'-103/8"11'-61/4"STAIN ALL BRICK TYP. ALL NEW EXTERIOR WINDOWS TYP. NEW GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT PATCH RAILINGS AS NECESSARY ALL NEW WOOD TRIM AT WINDOWS TYP. PATCH BRICK HERE AS NECESSARY NEW STANDING SEAM ROOF NEW LIGHT FIXTURE ALL NEW WOOD TRIM AT WINDOWS TYP.ALL NEW EXTERIOR WINDOWS TYP. NEW OPEN TOP BONDERIZED SHROUD NEW LIGHT FIXTURE ALL NEW INSULATED ROOF SYSTEM NEW PERIMITER WOOD BAND TO PATCH CUT WOOD RAFTERS HOLES STAIN ALL MORTAR TYP. NEW RECONFIGURED FENCE NEW STEPS & HANDRAIL.PATCH EXISTING RAILING AS NEEDED RE-GRADE AS NEEDED NEW LIGHT FIXTURE NEW STAIRS & HANDRAILS PATCH EXISTING RAILING AS NEEDED T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL) T.O. EXISTING ROOF 111'-6 1/4" (964.43 CIVIL) T.O. PROPOSED ROOF 112'-4 1/4" REFINISH ALL STUCCO TYP. NEW STAIRS AND RAILINGS NEW DOOR (SEE FLOOR PLAN) NEW WALL WITH VERTICAL WOOD SIDING REFINISH ALL STUCCO TYP. NEW WALL WITH VERTICAL WOOD SIDING NEW DOWNSPOUT ALL NEW EXTERIOR DOORS TYP. NEW GUTTER NEW DOWNSPOUT NEW TRIM REFINISH ALL STUCCO TYP. REFINISH ALL STUCCO TYP. NEW GRILL AND BUILT IN NEW DOOR (SEE FLOOR PLAN) ALL NEW EXTERIOR WINDOWS TYP. NEW BOARDS BETWEEN RAFTERS PAINTED FINISH ALL NEW WOOD TRIM AT WINDOWS TYP. PATCH BRICK AS NECESSARY STAIN ALL BRICK TYP. STAIN ALL MORTAR TYP. NEW STANDING SEAM ROOF NEW OPEN TOP BONDERIZED SHROUD ALL NEW INSULATED ROOF SYSTEM NEW PERIMITER WOOD BAND TO PATCH CUT WOOD RAFTERS HOLES NEW STAIRS AND RAILINGS NEW GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT NEW GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL T.O. PROPOSED ROOF 112'-4 1/4"8'-103/8"11'-61/4"NEW WALL WITH VERTICAL WOOD SIDING NEW CONCRETE WALLS, PATCH AS NEEDED NEW RECONFIGURED FENCE REFINISH STUCCO TYP. RELOCATE STEPS & ADD NEW RETAINING WALLS (SEE FLOOR PLAN) GRADE AS NEEDED NEW STAIRS AND RAILINGS NEW HOT TUB NEW STAIRS & HANDRAILS PATCH EXISTING RAILING AS NEEDED GRADE AS NEEDED KEEP PARTIAL WALL FOR DECK SUPPORT REMOVE PART OF WALL PATCH AS NEEDED NEW WOOD SIDING/COVER T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" (952.91 CIVIL) T.O. EXISTING ROOF 111'-6 1/4" T.O. FINISHED FLOOR - LOWER LEVEL 91'-1 5/8" (944.05 CIVIL) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 North Exterior Elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 East Exterior Elevation 3 Roof Eave Detail Existing 4 Roof Eave Detail Proposed 146 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:52 PM S C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0" Detached Garage Exterior Elevations - Proposed ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING A2.2D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 FILL WITH WOOD BETWEEN RAFTERS NEW LIGHT FIXTURES NEW INSULATED ROOF SYSTEM STANDING SEAM ROOF PAINT EXISTING WINDOWS NEW WOOD TRIM BAND AROUND THE BUILDING NEW LIGHT FIXTURENEW GARAGE DOOR STAIN BRICK AND MORTAR NEW GARAGE DOOR PAINT EXISTING WINDOW NEW INSULATED ROOF SYSTEM STANDING SEAM FINISH STAIN BRICK AND MORTAR NEW GARAGE DOOR FILL WITH WOOD BETWEEN RAFTERS PAINT EXISTING WINDOWS NEW INSULATED ROOF SYSTEM STANDING SEAM FINISH NEW WOOD TRIM BAND AROUND THE BUILDING PAINT OR STAIN EXISITNG SIDING NEW INSULATED ROOF SYSTEM STANDING SEAM FINISH NEW WOOD TRIM BAND AROUND THE BUILDING PAINT OR STAIN EXISITNG SIDING PAINT EXISTING WINDOWS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 North Detached Garage Exterior Elevation - Proposed SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 East Detached Garage Exterior Elevation - Proposed SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 South Detached Garage Exterior Elevation - Proposed SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 West Detached Garage Exterior Elevation - Proposed 147 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:52 PM S C A L E : 1:4.71 3D Views - Existing ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING A8.0D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 NOTE: 3D RENDERINGS ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL PURPOSES ONLY; THEY DO NOT REFLECT FINAL BUILD DETAILS AND BY NO MEANS SHALL BE USED AS DESIGN GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE REFER TO THE DRAWINGS & OUTLINE SPEC. FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION 148 GSPublisherVersion 1171.29.29.3 Printing Date:File Location: BIMcloud: SwanBimCloud 27 - BIMcloud Basic for Archicad 27/Zuendel Borrel_2315 COPYRIGHT SWAN ARCHITECTURE, LTD.12/8/2023 3:52 PM S C A L E : 1:4.71 3D Views - Proposed ZB Residence 2605 Mapleridge Ln. Orono, MN. 55331 DRAWING A8.1D a t e : SWANARCHITECTURE Variance Issue December 13, 2023 NOTE: 3D RENDERINGS ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL PURPOSES ONLY; THEY DO NOT REFLECT FINAL BUILD DETAILS AND BY NO MEANS SHALL BE USED AS DESIGN GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE REFER TO THE DRAWINGS & OUTLINE SPEC. FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION 149 Date:Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3Tier 4Tier 5S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.%Step 1: EXSITNG HARDCOVERCity of OronoHardcover Calculation Worksheet2605 Mapleridge Lane, Orono, MN, 5533112/12/2023In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all existing hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75’ setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Total (Square Feet)Property Address:Prepared By:Sathre-BerguistKey to SurveyHardcover Item (Describe)Length x Width(Example)(Garage)(24' x 30')CEXISTING DECKAEXISTING HOUSE2958BEXISTING SCREEN PORCH290(720 S.F.)EEXISTING PAVERS2774FCONCRETE & BRICK WALLS2131085DEXISTING CONCRETE 1666IEXISTING COLUMNS12JEXISTING POOL519GEXISTING DETACHED GARAGE1007H DECK STAIRS103MNKEXISITNG BOULDER WALLS338LSCONCRETE STEPPERS IN 75' SB9TPQRCONCRETE STEPPERS OUT 75' SB14OWXUVYZ338BOULDER WALLS(1) Total Existing/PROPOSED Hardcover10988Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684):KStormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One) SB Job Number:99753-001 Prepared By: BRVExsitng Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)]12.95%This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail.(3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)]10650(4) Total Lot Area82,241(2) Total Excludable Hardcover338PC Exhibit I150 Date:Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3Tier 4Tier 5S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One) SB Job Number: 99753-001 Prepared By: BRVExsitng Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)]14.42%This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail.(3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)]11858(4) Total Lot Area82,241(2) Total Excludable Hardcover520PROPOSED BOULDER WALLS(1) Total Existing/PROPOSED Hardcover12378Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684):KN185YZ338BOULDER WALLSWXUVST725P PROPOSED PAVERS318Q PROPOSED CONCRETE BRICK WALLS 132RO PROPOSED CONCRETEM PROPOSED HOT TUBE AREA DECKING 98N PROPOSED BOULDER WALLS 185K EXISITNG BOULDER WALLS338L PROPOSED HOT TUB50I EXISTING COLUMNS12J EXISTING POOL519G EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE 1007H PROPOSED DECK STAIRS132F CONCRETE & BRICK WALLS2131085D EXISTING CONCRETE 16892958B EXISTING SCREEN PORCH290(720 S.F.)E EXISTING PAVERS2627%Step 1: EXSITNG /PROPOSED HARDCOVERCity of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet2605 Mapleridge Lane, Orono, MN, 5533112/12/2023In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all existing hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75’ setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Total (Square Feet)Property Address:Prepared By: Sathre-BerguistKey to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width(Example) (Garage) (24' x 30')C EXISTING DECKA EXISTING HOUSE 151 152 2605 Maple Ridge Lane Variance Submittal I/We have reviewed the plans for 2605 Maple Ridge Lane and support the needed variance(s) for the renovation of the existing home. I/We have no objections. Name(s)____________________________________________________ Signature(s)_________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Address of Signee Date:____________________________ Rob Woseth 2610 Maple Ridge Lane Orono, MN 55331 12/8/23 153 154 155 156 157 38 21-117-23 21 0003 SEBAHATTIN CUREOGLU HATICE Z CUREOGLU 2601 WEST LAFAYETTE RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 21 0004 MAPLE RIDGE MANOR LLC 2665 MAPLE RIDGE LA ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 21 0005 LEGACY BRIDGE FAM OFICES 4601 WESTOWN PKWY #220 WEST DES MOINES IA 50266 38 21-117-23 21 0007 DAWN M PRIEM MICHAEL J H PRIEM 2605 WEST LAFAYETTE RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 21 0009 LQ WOSETH TRUST 2610 MAPLERIDGE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 21 0010 M PRIDE & S COON 2607 WEST LAFAYETTE RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 22 0004 ROBERT W MACDONALD 2480 OLD BEACH RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0005 SHAWN & JACQUELINE MCINTEE 2490 OLD BEACH RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0006 GERALD K & DIANE CARLSON 2496 OLD BEACH RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0007 TIMOTHY F OLSON 2510 OLD BEACH RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0008 MILAN ALLEN SCHWENDEMAN MELANIE LAIDLAW 2530 OLD BEACH RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 22 0009 AJD TRUST & KDA TRUST 2540 OLD BEACH RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 21-117-23 23 0005 JAMES W & CHERYL A JOHNSON 2655 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0022 PATTI J & PAUL B PETTY 2660 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0023 T J HADDEN & J M JOHNSON 2600 PHEASANT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0046 THOMAS G WINTZ 2680 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0047 ANTHONY KRIER & ROBIN KRIER 2655 W LAFAYETTE RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0048 MARGARET L LOWE 2630 LAFAYETTE RD W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0049 JAMES R GAGNE VICTORIA GAGNE 2615 W LAFAYETTE RD ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0050 ADAM KRAMBEER ERICKA KRAMBEER 2650 MAPLERIDGE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0051 ANDREW ASBURY DEANNA MAE ASBURY 2660 MAPLERIDGE LA ORONO MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0052 AMOS KIDRON & ORIT KIDRON 2670 MAPLERIDGE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0053 JOHN CROTTEAU DONNA CROTTEAU 2675 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 158 He nn epin Co u n ty L oc ate & N o tify Map 260 5 M a p le r idg e L ane 0 200 400100 Feet Da te : 12 /18/2 023 Buffer Size:500Map Co mm e nts : Th is d ata (i) is furn ish ed 'AS IS' with no represen ta tion as tocompleteness or accuracy; (ii) is fu rn ish ed with n o warra nty of anykind; an d (iii) is n ot suitable for le ga l, eng ineerin g or surve yingpurposes. Hennepin County shall not b e liab le for a ny da ma ge , in ju ryor loss resu lting from this dat a. Fo r mo re inf ormation , co nta ct Hen ne pin Co un ty GI S Off ice300 6th S tree t So uth , Minn ea polis, MN 5 5487 / gis.in fo@h en ne pin.us 159 Item No.: 4.5 Date: January 16, 2024 Presenter: Melanie Curtis Presenter: Planner Section:Public Hearings Title: LA23-000068, Murphy & Co. Design o/b/o 3400 Fox Street Trust, 3400 Fox Street, Average Lakeshore Setback Variances 1.Purpose: The purpose of this action is to review average lakeshore setback variances in order to redevelop the property. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received on December 13, 2023 and considered to be complete on December 14, 2023. Due to the lack of a Planning Commission meeting in December, the 60-day application review deadline has been extended an additional 60-days and will expire on April 12, 2024. 3.Background: The applicants are requesting average lakeshore setback variances to redevelop the 7+ acre peninsula property at the westernmost end of the private road portion of Fox Street addressed as 3400 Fox Street. Due to the property’s orientation as a peninsula, and the location of the homes on either side (3345 Fox Street on the north, and 3350 Fox Street on the east), the average lakeshore setback line renders the property unbuildable. Please refer to Exhibit A for a full background and analysis. 4.Staff Recommendation: Please refer to the Staff report attached as Exhibit A for the review and analysis of the variances. Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission Action Requested Planning Commission should make a motion to approve the variances according to the staff recommendation. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A - Staff Report.pdf Exhibit B - Application.pdf Exhibit C - Practial Difficulty Statement.pdf Exhibit D - Project Summary.pdf Exhibit E - Proposed Survey.pdf Exhibit F - 3D Renderings.pdf Exhibit G - Proposed Plans.pdf Exhibit H - Hardcover Calcs.pdf Exhibit I - ALS Aerial.pdf Exhibit J - Historical Surveys.pdf Exhibit K - View Easement.pdf Exhibit L - Wetland NOD.pdf 160 Exhibit M - Emails to Neighbors.pdf Exhibit N - Map, List.pdf 161 Date Application Received: 12/13/2023 Date Application Considered as Complete: 12/14/2023 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 04/12/2024 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 16 January 2024 Subject: #LA23-000068, Murphy & Co. Design o/b/o 3400 Fox Street Trust 3400 Fox Street Variance Public Hearing Background The applicants are requesting average lakeshore setback variances to redevelop the 7+ acre peninsula property at the westernmost end of the private road portion of Fox Street addressed as 3400 Fox Street. Due to the property’s orientation as a peninsula, and the location of the homes on either side (3345 Fox Street on the north, and 3350 Fox Street on the east), the average lakeshore setback line renders the property unbuildable. For this reason, the average lakeshore setback line is not depicted on the certificate of survey. Please refer to the aerial photo, Exhibit I, for the average lakeshore setback line. The property is also encumbered with a view easement benefitting the owners of 3350 Fox Street to the east (Lot 4, Block 1, Fullerton Estates). The view easement is depicted on the certificate of survey (Exhibit E); the easement is attached as Exhibit K. The applicant is proposing to construct a new home and detached garage on the property. The existing guest house on the west shoreline is proposed to remain at this time. Other than the average lakeshore setback, the proposed home and detached garage will conform to all other zoning requirements. The applicant will need to adjust the retaining wall and “guest court” associated with the detached garage to meet a minimum 5-foot setback from the property line. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the orientation of the property as a peninsula/corner lot and its relationship to the adjacent lakeshore homes as the primary practical difficulty supporting the requested variance(s). Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties, attached as Exhibit C, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff agrees with the applicant’s assessment the peninsula character of the lot as well as the location and orientation of the neighboring homes create considerable difficulty for the development of the property. The application of the average lakeshore setback renders the property unbuildable as it overlaps the required 50-foot rear setback. The additional encumbrance of the private view easement further Application Summary: The applicant is requesting average lakeshore setback variance approval to construct a new home and detached garage on the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. 162 FILE #LA23-000068 16 January 2024 Page 2 of 5 complicates the buildability of the property. It seems unlikely that on a 7+ acre lakeshore property, there would effectively be no buildable area. Taking into account the significant impact the 75-foot setback, floodplain, and wetland have on the property, there should be approximately 3 acres of buildable area. The view easement reduces this by approximately one acre, however, due to the easement’s central location it effectively removes about 2.3 buildable acres. The buildable area remaining after the areas impacted by the view easement are eliminated is approximately one acre, which is a sufficient size to construct a home and other improvements befitting an estate-sized property, but for the average lakeshore setback. LOT ANALYSIS Section 78-305 & 78-1279 – Setbacks: LR-1A DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 50’ ±240’ ±170’ House ±275’ Detached Garage* East Side 30’ ±60’ 30’ House ±161’ Detached Garage* North Side 30’ ±133’ 91’ House 37.1’ Detached Garage* Wetland 25’ or MCWD buffer ±215’ to pool/patio ±269’ to pool/patio Lakeshore 75’ 15.8’ Boat/guest house ±118’ House (west shoreline) 15.8’ Boat/guest house – no change ±250’ House (west shoreline) ±230’ House/Pool Pavilion (south shoreline) 83’ Detached Garage Average Lakeshore All of the improvements are lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. The average lakeshore setback line eliminates the entire buildable area of the property. *The detached garage has a footprint of 910 square feet which has a lesser setback than the principal building: 15 feet on the side yards and 15 feet on the rear. Note, the retaining wall and “guest court” associated with the detached garage must be adjusted to meet the required 5-foot setback from the property line. Section 78-305 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1A DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200’ Actual 320,316 s.f. (7.3 acre) The minimum width is met Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: The property exceeds 1.99 acres and is therefore not subject to structural coverage limitations. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 320,316 s.f. 80,079 s.f. (25 %) 27,617 s.f. (8.6%) 163 FILE #LA23-000068 16 January 2024 Page 3 of 5 Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) The purpose of the average lakeshore setback (ALS) regulation is to preserve views of the lake from the homes on the most adjacent lakeshore properties. The strictest interpretation of this regulation leads one to believe that the ALS protects a lakeshore property owner’s view of the lake across a neighboring property. The application of the average lakeshore setback on this property results in no available building envelope. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The requested average lakeshore setback variance is the minimum necessary to develop the property and will result in no view loss from either neighbor. The request is in harmony with the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The requested variance does not result in an adverse view impact on either neighbor, therefore it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The proposed home and detached garage are reasonable as they are smaller in scale and are to be located further from the lake than the existing residence. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The property is unique having lakeshore on two sides and acts as a corner lot abutting a channel. The property owner has no control over the placement of the homes on the adjacent lakeshore lots although they impact the ALS line. applying the ALS over this parcel eliminates the legal building envelope. The owner did not create the lot and is proposing structures in locations that improve the current condition. This criterion is met; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed scale and location of the home and detached garage are improvements from the 164 FILE #LA23-000068 16 January 2024 Page 4 of 5 existing condition and will not alter the character of the area. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as residential buildings are an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The configuration and orientation of the property are extremely unique. The additional condition of the view easement is also a unique condition of the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Without the variance, the property would be unbuildable. The variance is necessary to preserve the primary property right of the owner. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The granting of the requested variance is necessary to alleviate a considerable difficulty impacting the property. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments The applicant provided detailed plans to the neighbors and encouraged them to reach out with any concerns or comments. Copies of the emails sent to the neighbors are attached as Exhibit M. To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Is there a need to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 165 FILE #LA23-000068 16 January 2024 Page 5 of 5 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation There are a few areas requiring minor adjustments (detached garage parking court, retaining wall, and a portion of the proposed lake access stair). Staff will work with the applicant on those minor items. However, the variances requested are supported by significant demonstrated practical difficulty; Staff recommends approval. 166 12/21/23, 2:58 PM Permit List | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=88061929&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:12/13/2023 Address:3400 Fox ST Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number:0511723430005 Land Use Number:LA23-000068 Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner Owner:Name: 3400 Fox Street Trust Address: - Robert and Courtney Kill Applicant:Name: TJ Majdecki Company: Murphy & Co. Design Address: 235 Lake Street E. Wayzata, MN 55391 tj@murphycodesign.com Contact Information:Associated Contact: Kareem Reda Kareem@andersonreda.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:Average Setback Variance Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 167 12/21/23, 2:58 PM Permit List | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=88061929&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/2 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA23-000068 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The owner is proposing to use the property in the same manner as it exists today with a single-family home in the same general vicinity as it currently exists on the site. The straight line setback delineation prohibits this, as the current structure is non- conforming. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The intention of the straight line setback, from our perspective, is to maintain a common/shared setback from the shoreline on lake lots between neighboring parcels and avoid view corridor infractions. The plight of the landowner for a corner / peninsula lot is a straight line setback that bisects their property. This is a unique condition which applies to a small number of properties on Lake Minnetonka, specific to a severe curve or shift in the natural shoreline of the lake. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The variance would allow a new single family home in the same vicinity of what already exists on the site and not alter the use or character of the property. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations are not being introduced as a practical difficulty in this condition. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: We do not believe this item is applicable for our request. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: The proposed structure would meet the zoning requirements for the LR-1A district, in regard to setbacks, coverage, and height in every aspect per Sec. 78-305. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: We do not believe this item is applicable for our request. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The straight line setback requirement is intended for neighboring parcels that share a generally continuous shoreline. In the instance of this property, the shoreline shifts drastically between Stubbs Bay and Maxwel Bay and creates a neighboring parcel to the direct north, and one to the direct east. We believe that condition is not in line with the intention of the zoning requirement. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: While there may be other lots with similar conditions in regards to bisecting a lot, this instance and property provides a severe scenario where the straight line setback creates a buildable area close to 1.5% of the overall property size (5,430 buildable square feet on a 320,589 square foot lot) 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The variance would allow the owner to use the property in the same manner as it is currently being used. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The variance would allow the owner to use the property in the same manner as it is currently being used. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. 168 12/21/23, 2:58 PM Permit List | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=88061929&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 2/2 Response: As noted above, the straight line setback would create a buildable area of approximately 1.5% of the overall lot size, impact usability of the overall property and shoreline, and work against the general zoning allowances for the LR-1A district. 169 Page 1 of 2 Date: December 13, 2023 Project: 3400 Fox Street Re: Variance Application Fox Point Project Summary The proposed project is a new single-family residen ce and detached garage, to replace an existing home built in 1999, located at 3400 Fox Street on L ake Minnetonka. The lot (PID 0511723430005) is zoned as LR-1A (one-family lakeshore Residential – 2 Acres) and meets all the minimum requirements for lots within that zoning district. The design goals of the homeowner and project team (Murphy & Co. Design, TVLS, and Anderson Reda) is to create a new principal structure that f its the existing topography and grade elevations of the site while also capturing the available views t o both Stubbs and Maxwell Bay. The indoor / outdoor connection between the main floor layout an d exteriors are also a driving force behind the more meandering floor plan, allowing for interior r ooms and spaces to have a direct connection and access to multiple landscape elements around the ho me, including a pool and spa, outdoor pergola, production garden and greenhouse, and exterior terr aces and dining space. The massing of the structure is dictated by the single floor living as pect of the home, with all public gathering spaces and primary suite space designed within a single / main level. This design approach created a series of living ‘nodes’ with low pitched roof lines (8:12 be ing the main roof pitch) connected and carved into the existing grade planes. The result is a massing element that is shorter in height than the existing structure (please refer to the 3D renderings and th e massing comparison studies) and takes full advantage of the wide lot and available views. Walk out space from the lower level ties into the existing grade plans on the west side of the lot / shoreline, and the walkout conditions to the south side of the lot are concealed from the lakeshore us ing retaining walls and a sunken terrace space which allow for the massing to appear as a single s tory structure from the Maxwell Bay shoreline. The unique nature of this property led to both chal lenges and advantages when it came to the initial layout of the floor plans and site orientation. We, the design team and clients, feel we have a proposed design that fits the natural aesthetic of the lot and does not overpower the landscape elements that are both existing and planned. Placi ng the new home in the general footprint of the existing structure was very intentional to maintain views towards both bays, while also respecting the existing view corridor easement that exists on the property (please refer to the landscape plans and survey for location of this existing 150’ view corr idor.) {Please note that an existing and non-conforming gu est house exists on the property, with no planned removal or improvements to this structure a t this time .} 170 Page 2 of 2 Requested Variance The proposed placement of the principal building an d accessory building have been designed to achieve all setback requirements, including wetland and OHWL, as required by the LR-1A zoning district. However, per Sec. 78-1279 – Placement of buildings and structure s on lots this lot also requires an average lakeshore setback. As defined i n the code, the average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakewa rd protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lake shore lots. The 3400 Fox Street site is a peninsula / corner lo t condition, being set at an approximate right angl e to the two adjacent lots, as indicated in the image (take from the Hennepin County GIS map, property outlined in blue) below: The required straight line setback bisects the lot near the existing driveway entry point into the property and creates an unbuildable lot condition (please refer to the landscape plans and survey for location of this straight line setback location.) Our team is requesting a variance to this straight line setback requirement, and instead asking for a setback as defined below for the principal and deta ched accessory structures: · 30’-0” interior side setback to the east · 30’-0” interior side setback to the north · Northerly line of the 150’-0” view easement corrido r to the south · 75’-0” OHWL setback to the west These setbacks would place the new principal struct ure in the general vicinity of the existing and non - conforming structure. 171 172 3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 1P r o p o s e d & E x i s t i n g 173 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 2 174 P r o p o s e d & E x i s t i n g3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 3 175 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 4 176 P r o p o s e d & E x i s t i n g3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 5 177 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 6 178 P r o p o s e d & E x i s t i n g3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 7 179 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 8 180 P r o p o s e d & E x i s t i n g3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 9 181 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 1 0 182 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 1 1 183 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 1 2 184 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 1 3 185 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 1 4 186 P r o p o s e d3 4 0 0 F o x S t r e e t 1 5 187 StairsRec. RoomLowerBed #2LowerCourtyardFlex BedFlexAnte13'-212"12'-23 4"FlexBath2830 c.o.Mech. #2Golf Simulator 16'-0"LowerBed #1Elevator- 36x48 cab8'-33 4"12'-83 4"5'-33 4"13'-0"17'-0"6'-134"5'-0"Crawl SpaceCrawl SpaceCrawl Space2828Lower PowderBed #1BathLowerHallLowerEntry27'-1114"23'-818"23'-114"16'-0"282428 pocketdoor3'-6"24286'-0"6'-734"2828284'-0"Bed #2Bath28 c.o.28 c.o.Mech. #1CourtyardEntry5'-0"10'-2"4'-8"5'-214"3'-6"8'-114"12'-6"Bed #2Ante16'-7"26'-112"15'-1114"40 opng30 concealeddoor in jambDownElevator equip.LowerStorageLowerHallBed #1AnteBridge aboveUpUp282650 c.o.303015'-214"10'-0"30"pubtableBed #1ClosetEq.Eq.5'-6"5'-0"246'-314"3'-6"5'-4"4'-514"6'-014"Pair of16 doorsBed #2Closet4'-814"284'-0"3'-1014"4'-514"3'-0"Counter w/ storage belowStorage cab.SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetResidence3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140A103Lower Level PlanDecember 7, 2023 [In-progress]December 13, 2023 [Variance]N188 Garage-Conc. slab w/ epoxy finish- In-floor heatPrimary Closet- Wood- 10' clgPrimary Bath- Tile- 10' clgPrimary Bedroom- Wood- VaultedPrimaryLaundry- Tile- 9'-6" clgRob'sOffice- WoodEntry- StoneElevator- 36x48 cabPowder- Tile- 9'-0" clg hgtLiving- WoodStairsDining- WoodFree standingtub 38" x 72"28 pocketdoorWine36" ref.36" frzr30"ovensKitchen- WoodDen- WoodCourtney'sOffice- WoodGreenhouse- StoneMud Room- TileRearHallPantry- WoodD.w.Trash30" ref.Gym- Rubber- VaultedGymBathSteamshowerDown Hot tub (8'-0" x 10'-0")GarageEntrySinkTrashD.w.48"cooktopDownFrontStoop- Mudset stoneBench w / h o o k s a b v .Table16'-0"16'-0"5'-0"14'-5"16'-058"WoodstorageCurblessshowerPrimary Hall- Wood- 10' clgExist. 12'-10" x 11'-3"13'-0"21'-712"Exist. 13'-0" x 12'-8"Exist. 18'-9" x 18'-1"Exist. 14'-0" x 8'-0"Exist. 10'-6"x 7'-0"Exist. 12'-10" x 7'-0"Exist. 8'-0" x 8'-0"Exist. 23'-0" x 24'-6"Exist. 13'-6" x 20'-1"Exist. 19'-0" x 25'-0"Exist. 6'-7" x 11'-6"Exist. 12'-0" x 17'-0"Exist. 11'-6" x 7'-4"16'-0"12'-314"5'-0"3'-6"4'-278"11'-4"7'-0"PrimaryAnte- WoodPrimary W.C.- TileExist. 3'-5" x 5'-10"10'-1012" 27'-912"23'-0"16'-0"24'-2"24'-8"8'-6"13'-012" 5'-3" 5'-0" 5'-83 4" 17'-612"3'-0"11'-0"GymAnte7'-514"10'-6"SinkCoatsIsokern +84magnumWoodstorageBench13'-2"10'-0"10'-0" 9'-0"15'-034"7'-0"Exist. 15'-4"x 11'-0"5'-914"8'-10"5'-0"6'-6"3030 pocketdoor30 pocketdoorPair 30pocketdoors30 pocketdoor12'-6"Island3'-614"Sink3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"BenchDesk(7'-0" x3'-0")Bench4'-0"18" d.linen6'-3"4'-6"5'-434"5'-0" 5'-3"1'-8"Flushhearth1'-8"Flushhearth2'-6"Raisedhearth4'-0"WD30 pocketdoor30 pocketdoor4'-0" 14'-2" 18" d. buffet 4'-614"5'-812"3'-8" x12'-3"tableMasonlite 634 0 ' - 0 "RearLaundry- Tile3' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 1 " 3' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 4'-0"Sink30 opng30 opng3'-0"48" h. ledge @ shower30" h. ledge @ tub5'-0"262630Tv4'-0"4'-4"30 opngCab.289'-0"GymEntryBenchGymShower8'-434"5'-2" 4'-0"2430 opngSaunaPelotonTvTreadmillRower4'-2"4'-6"LGStudioStylerOperating wndws,motorized shade,no draperyOperating wndw,motorized shade,draperyOperating wndws,motorized shade,draperyMed. cab.Med. cab.Operating wndws,motorized shade,no drapery18" d.linenOperating wndw,motorized shade,no draperyFixed wndws,motorized shade,draperyFixed wndw,motorized shade,no draperyFixed wndw,motorized shade,no drapery18" d. counterOperating wndws,shades in jamb4'-0"26BridgeTv abv. f.p.Yoga areaBroomClosetKitchenEntry4'-21 2"4'-0"6'-0"4'-0"30 opng4'-4"4'-412"30 pocketdoor36Down6'-0"9'-0" soffit hgt9'-0" soffit hgt60 sliding doorSloped clg ConcealeddoorSecret Room50 c.o.50 c.o.50 c.o.Storage cab.26Sink4'-10"26Down3'-7"30 pocketdoor4'-6" 6'-01 4"DownDownDown 2424Down6'-0"16'-058"Wood ledgeWDPrinter29" tall x 31"deep x 80"long tableWoodstorage30'-0"1 0 ' - 1 " 13'-514" 3'-6"3'-6"Waterfiller3'-212"Mirror Mirror / barre 40" ØminitrampTowelsFree weights PowerPlate11'-912"6'-834"Masonlite 39Down Storagecab.12" deep ledge8'-0"Dog doorbelow counter86'-814"14'-9"6'-814"18'-0"18'-5"14'-5"14'-5"171'-212"4'-114"2'-10"13'-834"17'-5"6'-634"13'-6"7'-2"25'-4"17'-0"6'-314"20'-834"3'-434"118'-1138"8'-414"24'-012"9"4'-634"13'-6"7'-10"24'-8"17'-0"18'-2"12'-014"12'-014"9'-212"9'-212"11'-0"32'-6"42'-43 4" 14'-6"18'-1112"7'-814" 4 0 ' - 0 "4'-6"11'-1112"7'-512"49'-81 2" 12'-13 4" 19'-31 2" 18'-31 4" 41'-1"43'-6"15'-812"11'-0"32'-6"9'-65 8" 3'-1" 14'-31 2" 9'-1" 5'-07 8"12'-658"9'-7"9'-7" 2'-0" 13'-103 4"13'-103 4"50 c.o.12'-1"12'-1" 2'-8"3'-6"4'-10" 9'-83 4"4'-2"4'-0"17'-0"JeepCherokee(183" x 75")BMW X5(194" x 79")Suburban(226" x 81")6' - 4 " 4' - 6 " 3' - 7 3 8"2'-0"5'-978"3'-778"6'-878"4' - 0 " Books 40opng30" ref.30" frzrTrash / recyclingreceptacles2'-6"2'-6"8'-0"1 0 "SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetResidence3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140A106Main Level PlanDecember 5, 2023 [In-progress]December 7, 2023 [In-progress]December 13, 2023 [Variance]NPlan break - seeA108 for Pergolacontinuation189 SteamshowerHot tub (8'-0" x 10'-0")3'-0"BenchGymShower24RowerTv abv. f.p.4'-6"24filler3'-212"Mirror Free weightsMasonlite 39verify fp model3'-6" x10'-0" tableopen orservingcounter ?Storagecab.Workisland42" grillsink ?Pizzaoven4'-6"4'-6"14'-0"Storagecab.12" deep ledgedrop-down tv ?15'-0" (typ.) 8'-0"open roof above4'-114"2'-10"3'-434"11'-0"32'-6"7'-814"18'-0"55'-4" 15'-0" (typ.)15'-0" (typ.)4'-6"17'-0"SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetResidence3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140A108Main Level Plan (Pergola) /Main Level Dimension Plan (Pergola)December 13, 2023 [Variance]NScale:14" = 1'-0"Main Level Plan 190 Top of typ.Main level subfloor Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Top of typ.Lower level slab Lower level clg9'-0"1248'-312"12612'-0"12812622'-73 8" (Height above proposed grade)Top of typ.Main level subfloor Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Open to PergolaOpen to PergolaOpen to PergolaTop of typ.Main level subfloor Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Top of typ.Lower level slab Lower level clg9'-0"8'-5"12830'-117 8"(Height above proposed grade)Saddle - seeRoof Plan128Top of typ.Main level subfloor Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Stone wndwlintel & sillflashing mat'l /color tbd128Top of typ.Lower level slab Lower level clg9'-0"8'-2"124128Open to PergolaOpen to PergolaSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetResidence3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140A201Exterior ElevationsDecember 7, 2023 [In-progress]December 13, 2023 [Variance]Scale:14" = 1'-0"South Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"South Elevation (Pergola)Scale:14" = 1'-0"West Elevation (Pergola)Scale:14" = 1'-0"East Elevation (Pergola)Scale:14" = 1'-0"West Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"North Elevation (Primary Closet)191 Primary Bedroom8'-818" Rough frmg hgt 2'-0" Frmg Primary HallPrimary Laundry12410'-118" Rough clg hgt 128Top of typ.Main level subfloor Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Top of typ.Lower level slab Lower level clg9'-0"128Mech. #13'-0"1'-1114" 9'-33 4" Rough clg hgt 4'-0" Poured wall hgt LowerHallLowerBed #1Bed #1Closet9'-4" Rough frmg hgt 10'-4" 1'-4" Frmg 2'-03 4" 3'-6" 2'-3" 23'-83 8" (Height above proposed grade)Entry10'-33 8"Rough frmg hgt2'-0"Frmg FrontStoop12'-0" total rise (19 R @ ± 7 916" ea.)4'-0"10'-33 8"Rough frmg hgt 128128128Mech. #1CourtyardEntry3'-10"12413'-112"Poured wall hgt11'-4"Poured wall hgt 2'-3"4'-0"Pouredwall hgt 9'-4"Rough frmg hgt 2'-03 4"10'-118"Rough clg hgt634"3'-6"9'-33 4"Rough clg hgt9'-4"Rough clg hgt Top of typ.Main level subfloor Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Top of typ.Lower level slab Lower level clg9'-0"Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Entry10'-33 8" Rough frmg hgt 9'-4" Rough frmg hgt 2'-03 4"Top of typ.Lower level slab Lower level clg9'-0"128Wood storageTop of typ.Main level subfloor Mech. #11282'-0" Frmg CourtyardEntry1244'-0" Poured wall hgt 10'-118" Rough clg hgt 9'-1114" Fin. clg hgt Saddle - seeRoof Plan2'-3" 13'-112" Poured wall hgt 11'-4" Poured wall hgt 9'-33 4" Rough clg hgt SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetResidence3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140A202Exterior ElevationsDecember 7, 2023 [In-progress]December 13, 2023 [Variance]Scale:14" = 1'-0"North Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section 192 Living11'-6"Rough frmg hgt14'-6"Rough vault hgt 12883" tv124Rec. Room11'-4"Poured wall hgt 1012"Heel hgt 1'-4"Frmg9'-4"Rough clg hgt 2'-0"Frmg 12811'-53 4"Rough wall hgt2'-3"Dining11'-6" Rough clg hgt 128Golf SimulatorTop of typ. lowerlevel slab12811'-10" Poured wall hgt 12'-10" Poured wall hgt 10'-10" Rough clg hgt 2'-3" 2'-0" Frmg 1'-6" 63 4" 11'-814" Rough frmg hgtDining 128123Den clg11'-0"Top of droppedDen subfloor 3'-23 4"Plaster11'-6" Rough clg hgt 1'-0"Golf SimulatorTop of typ. lowerlevel slab12811'-10" Poured wall hgt 12'-10" Poured wall hgt Grade beyondshown dashed10'-10" Rough clg hgt 11'-814" Rough frmg hgt 2'-3" 1'-6" 2'-0" Frmg GymEntryGymBathCrawl Space1282'-0" Frmg 4'-0" Rough clg hgt 10'-33 8" Rough frmg hgt 3'-10" 1'-6" Frmg 10'-118" Rough clg hgt 1236'-0" Poured wall hgt 63 4" 10'-33 8" Rough frmg hgt 2'-3" 1'-63 4" 3'-10" 2'-3"4'-0" Rough clg hgt GymCrawl Space12'-6" Rough clg hgtKitchenGymEntryGymAnte10'-118" Rough clg hgt 1266'-0" Poured wall hgt 6'-10" 7'-4"Mech. #212663 4"8'-612" Rough frmg hgt 1'- 2 " frm g 2'-0" Frmg 1'-6" Frmg 8'-414" Rough wall hgtDenKitchen 1281'-6"Frmg3'-6"Roughclg hgt 123Mech. #2Crawl Space1281'-0" total rise(2" R @ 6" ea.)Top of typ. lowerlevel slab5'-0"Poured wall hgt5'-10"Poured wall hgt 11'-4"Poured wall hgt 2'-0"Frmg9'-6"Rough clg hgt 2'-3"1'-9"11'-33 8"Rough frmg hgt10'-33 8"Rough frmg hgt11'-118"Rough clg hgt10'-118"Rough clg hgt5'-4"SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetResidence3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140A203Exterior ElevationsDecember 7, 2023 [In-progress]December 13, 2023 [Variance]Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section 193 Top of typ.Main level subfloor Main level clg10'-1 1/8"KitchenPrimary AnteGolf SimulatorMech. #2126Rec. RoomCourtyard EntryLower Hall1'-6"1264'-0" Poured wall hgt 9'-4" Rough frmg hgt 2'-03 4"10'-33 8" Rough frmg hgtBed #2ClosetBed #2AnteDiningLivingEntry10'-118"Drop slab 2"@ perim.11'-4"Poured wall hgt12'-10"Poured wall hgt 11'-6" Rough clg hgt 2'-0" Frmg 2'-0" Frmg 2'-3" 2'-0" Frmg 10'-10" Rough clg hgt 10'-118" Rough clg hgt 2'-3"11'-0" Rough clg hgt 2'-0"Courtney'sOfficeKitchenEntryWoodstorage± 8.6112Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Top of typ.Main level subfloor 123128Crawl Space4'-0" Rough clg hgt 6'-0" Poured wall hgt 2'-3" 2'-0" Frmg 10'-118" Rough clg hgt 6'-0" Poured wall hgt 10'-1018"128RearLaundryGarageEntry8'-2" Rough wall hgt ± 8.6112Crawl SpaceOutside face ofwall in foregroundshown dashed6'-3" Rough wall hgt 4'-0" Rough clg hgt 7'-113 4" Rough frmg hgt 63 4" 6'-0" Poured wall hgt 1'-4"Frmg2'-0" Frmg Top of typ.Main level subfloor Main level clg10'-1 1/8"Lower level clg9'-0"SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetResidence3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140A204Exterior ElevationsDecember 7, 2023 [In-progress]December 13, 2023 [Variance]Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Southeast Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section 194 1'-6"128Garage clgGarage clg128128128Garage6'-1118" 5'-0" Poured wall hgt 9'-118" Rough frmg hgt 9'-718" Rough clg hgt 9'-5" Poured wall hgt 1'-4"FrmgSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetResidence3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140A205Exterior ElevationsDecember 7, 2023 [In-progress]December 13, 2023 [Variance]Scale:14" = 1'-0"Building Section Scale:14" = 1'-0"Northwest Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"Northwest Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"Northeast Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"Southeast Elevation 195 Garage clgTop ofGarage slabTop ofLower Garage slab18'-312"Verify final grade127127Garage clgTop ofGarage slabTop ofLower Garage slabGarage clgTop ofGarage slabTop ofLower Garage slab28'-107 8"127127Garage clgTop ofGarage slabTop ofLower Garage slabVerify final gradeSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetDetached Garage3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140GDecember 13, 2023 [Variance]Exterior ElevationsA201Scale:14" = 1'-0"1A201North Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"2A201West Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"3A201South Elevation Scale:14" = 1'-0"4A201East Elevation 196 24'-812"29'-212"LowerDetached Garage-Conc. slab w/ epoxy finish- In-floor heatSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetDetached Garage3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140GDecember 13, 2023 [Variance]Foundation Plan, Lower Level Plan,& Lower Level Dimension PlanA101NGraphic Scale{Scale in Feet}03148122Scale:14" = 1'-0"Lower Level Plan 197 JeepCherokee(183" x 75")BMW X5(194" x 79")28'-0"32'-6"8'-0"5'-7"4'-4"2'-6"5'-5" 26'-3"30'-9"Detached Garage-Conc. slab w/ epoxy finish- In-floor heatSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEISSUE DATESTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PROFESSIONALLY PREPAREDBY MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. AND ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OFMURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED,REPRODUCED OR USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTENCONSENT OF MURPHY & COMPANY DESIGN, INC.MURPHY&CODISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTUREMURPHY & CO. DESIGN235 LAKE ST EAST, SUITE 301, WAYZATA MN 55391612-470-55113400 Fox StreetDetached Garage3400 Fox StreetOrono MN 5535623-140GDecember 13, 2023 [Variance]Main Level Plan &Main Level Dimension PlanA102NGraphic Scale{Scale in Feet}03148122Scale:14" = 1'-0"Main Level Plan 198 L000PROJECT INFORMATIONN/A3400 FOX STREETISSUED FOR VARIANCE:12/13/2023AABVABOVEADAREA DRAINADAAMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACTADJADJACENTAGGAGGREGATEALGNALIGNMENTALUMALUMINUMANODANODIZEDAPPROXAPPROXIMATEARCHARCHITECT, ARCHITECTUREAVGAVERAGEBBBBALLED AND BURLAPPEDBCBACK OF CURBBFFEBASEMENT FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONBLDGBUILDINGBOCBOTTOM OF CURBBOPBOTTOM OF POOLBORBOTTOM OF RAMPBOSBOTTOM OF STAIRBOTBOTTOMBOWBOTTOM OF WALLBTWNBETWEENCCALCALIPERCAPCAPACITYCBCATCH BASINCHAMCHAMFERCIPCAST IN PLACECIVILCIVIL ENGINEERCJCONTROL JOINTCLCENTER LINECLRCLEAR, CLEARANCECMCENTIMETERCMUCONCRETE MASONRY UNITCOCLEAN OUTCOLCOLUMNCOMPCOMPOSITE, COMPACTEDCONCCONCRETECONDCONDITIONCONIFCONIFEROUSCONSTCONSTRUCTIONCONTCONTINUOUSCNTRCENTERCFCUBIC FEETCUCUBICCYCUBIC YARDSD(D)DEEP, DEPTHDBLDOUBLEDECIDDECIDUOUSDEMODEMOLISH, DEMOLITIONDETDETAILDIADIAMETERDIM/SDIMENSION/SDNDOWNDRDRAINDWG/SDRAWING/SEEEASTEAEACHEJEXPANSION JOINTELELEVATIONELECELECTRICALEQEQUALEQUIPEQUIPMENTESTESTIMATEETREXISTING TO REMAINE.W.EACH WAYEXPEXPOSEDEXTEXTERIOREXTGEXISTINGFFDNFOUNDATIONF.F.FILTER FABRICFFEFINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONFGFINISHED GRADEFINFINISHFLFLOORFOBFACE OF BRICKFOCFACE OF CONCRETEFOWFACE OF WALLFTFEET, FOOTFTGFOOTINGFURNFURNISHINGFUTFUTUREGGAGAUGEGALVGALVANIZEDGCGENERAL CONTRACTORGENGENERAL, GENERATORGEOGEO-TECHNICALGLGLASS, GLAZINGH(H)HIGH/HEIGHTHBHOSE BIBHCHANDICAPHDCPHANDICAP, HANDICAPPEDHDWDHARDWOODHDWRHARDWAREHORIZHORIZONTALH.P.HIGH POINTHRHANDRAILHTHEIGHTII.D.INSIDE DIAMETER, INSIDE DIMENSIONI.E.INVERT ELEVATIONININCH, INCHESINCLINCLUDEDINSULINSULATIONINTINTERIORINVINVERT ELEVATIONJJSTJOISTJTJOINTKK.O.KNOCK OUTL(L)LENGTHL.A.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTLBPOUNDL.F.LINEAR FOOTLOCNLOCATIONLODLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEL.P.LOW POINTLTLIGHTMMAINTMAINTAIN, MAINTENANCEMASMASONRYMATMATERIALMAXMAXIMUMMECHMECHANICALMEMBMEMBRANEMFRMANUFACTURERMHMANHOLEMINMINIMUMMISCMISCELLANEOUSMTLMETALNNNORTHN/ANOT APPLICABLEN.F.C.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONN.I.C.NOT IN CONTRACTNo.NUMBERNOMNOMINALNTSNOT TO SCALEOOAOVERALLO.C.ON CENTERO.D.OUTSIDE DIAMETER, OUTSIDE DIMENSIONOFDOVERFLOW DRAINOHOVERHEADOHWORDINARY HIGH WATER MARKOPNGOPENINGOPPOPPOSITEORNMORNAMENTALPPAPLANTED AREAPARPARALLELPCPOINT OF CURVATURE, PRECASTPERFPERFORATEDPERPPERPENDICULARPLPLATE, PROPERTY LINEPLYWDPLYWOODPNTPAINTPOBPOINT OF BEGINNINGPOIPOINT OF INTERSECTIONPOTPOINT OF TANGENCYPSFPOUNDS PER SQUARE FOOTPSIPOUNDS PER SQUARE INCHPTPOINT, PRESSURE TREATEDPUPOLYURETHANEPVCPOLYVINYL CHLORIDEPVMTPAVEMENTPVRPAVERQQTRQUARTERQTYQUANTITYRRRISER, RELOCATE(R)RISER HEIGHTRADRADIUSRDROOF DRAINREBARREINFORCING BARRECEPTRECEPTACLERECTRECTANGULARREFREFERENCEREINFREINFORCED, REINFORCEMENTREMREMOVEREQDREQUIREDRETRETAINING, RETURNREVREVISIONROROUGH OPENINGROWRIGHT OF WAYRPRADIUS POINTRTRIGHTSSSOUTHSCHEDSCHEDULESECTSECTIONSDSTORM DRAINS.F.SQUARE FEETSHTSHEETSIMSIMILARSLRSEALERSPECSPECIFICATIONSPPSPECIESSQSQUARESSSANITARY SEWERSSTSTAINLESS STEELSTSTORM SEWERSTASTATIONSTDSTANDARDSTLSTEELSTRUCTSTRUCTURE, STRUCTURALSURFSURFACE, SURFACINGS.Y.SQUARE YARDSYMSYMMETRICALT(T)THICKT&BTOP AND BOTTOMTBCTOP OF BACK OF CURBTBDTO BE DETERMINEDTHRTHRESHOLDTOCTOP OF CURB, TOP OF CONCRETETODTOP OF DECKTOFTOP OF FOOTINGTOPTOP OF PAVINGTOPOTOPOGRAPHYTORTOP OF RAMPTOSTOP OF STAIRTOWTOP OF WALLTRANSELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERTSLTOP OF SLABTVLSTRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIOTYPTYPICALUUTILUTILITYVVARVARIABLE, VARIESVEHVEHICLEVIFVERIFY IN FIELDVERTVERTICALVOLVOLUMEWWWEST(W)WIDE, WIDTHW/WITHW/OWITHOUTWDWOODWLWATER LEVELWPWATERPROOF, WORK POINTWSWATER SUPPLYWTWEIGHTWTRWATERWWFWELDED WIRE FABRICWWMWELDED WIRE MESHYYDYARDSYMBOLS&ANDANGLE⌒ARC LENGTH@AT℄CENTER LINEØDIAMETER°DEGREE#NUMBER, POUND/PER±PLUS/MINUSPROPERTY LINELANDSCAPE ABBREVIATIONSLANDSCAPE LINE LEGENDLANDSCAPE SYMBOL LEGENDPAVING HATCH LEGENDPLANT HATCH LEGENDSECTION/DETAIL HATCH LEGENDPROPERTY LINERIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTSETBACKEXISTING CONTOURSXXXPROPOSED CONTOURSXXXCENTER LINE℄ ℄SFSFSILT FENCEXXXTREE PROTECTION FENCELODLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEOHWORDINARY HIGH WATER MARKDRAIN TILESSSANITARY SEWERSTSTORM SEWERFENCE, TYPE 1FENCE, TYPE 2EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDDECID.CONIF.ORNM.EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVEDAND PROTECTEDDECID.CONIF.ORNM.PROPOSED NEW TREEDECID.CONIF.ORNM.NEW SHRUBDECIDUOUSCONIFERNEW PERENNIAL / ANNUALFORBGRASSGAS METERGASWATER METERWTRAIR CONDITIONER UNITACCBRDADCATCH BASIN, ROOF DRAIN, OR AREA DRAINTRASH CONTAINERGEN.GENERATORP.E.PUP-UP EMITTERWATER SUPPLYWSPLANTER POTPOTPOTSWING GATELIGHT FIXTURESEXTERIOR ELECTRICAL OUTLETSEXTERIOR LIGHT SWITCHPOBPOINT OF BEGINNINGTRAFFICFLOWTRAFFIC FLOW ARROWPOINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDINGEXISTING SPOT ELEVATION000.00XPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONXXX.XXLOCNDATUM ELEVATIONXXX.XXLOCNSLOPE-AT-SURFACE / DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWX.XX%STAIRDNUPHOSE BIBHB90°180°270°360°SPRINKLER HEADSSITE ELEMENT TO BE REMOVEDASPHALT SURFACINGCONCRETE SURFACINGCRUSHED AGGREAGATE SURFACINGDRY-SET UNIT PAVER (HERRINGBONE)MORTAR-SET UNIT PAVER (HERRINGBONE)DRY-SET UNIT PAVER (RUNNING BOND)MORTAR-SET UNIT PAVER (RUNNING BOND)DRY-SET PAVINGMORTAR-SET PAVINGVENEER STAIRMONOLITHIC TREADLANSCAPE STEPPER UNITFLAGSTONE SURFACINGSAND BLANKETRIPRAPPOUROUS GRASS PAVING SYSTEMTURFSTONE PAVER SYSTEMNETLON ADVANCED TURF SYSTEMSLOPETAME EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMTURF / SODPLANTING AREAFESCUESEEEDING - TYPE 1SEEEDING - TYPE 2GROUND COVER - TYPE 1GROUND COVER - TYPE 2GROUND COVER - TYPE 3CONCRETEASPHALTSTONE, TYPE 1STONE, TYPE 2STONE, TYPE 3SANDMORTARGRANULAR FILLCOMPACTED AGGREGATEMETALWOODDIMENSIONAL LUMBER (SECTION)PLANTING SOILEARTH (DISTURBED)EARTH (COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED)PROJECT SITESheet #TitleIssuedPRELIMINARYPRICINGVARIANCEAPPLICATIONPERMIT SETBID SETCD SETREVISIONSL000PROJECT INFORMATION*L001GENERAL NOTES*1CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY*L010EXISTING CONDITIONS / REMOVALS PLAN*L100SITE REFERENCE PLAN*L101SITE LAYOUT PLAN*L102SURFACING AND WALLS PLAN*L103SITE ELEMENTS AND LIGHTING PLAN*L200GRADING & DRAINAGE REFERENCE PLAN*L201GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN*L401LANDSCAPE REFERENCE PLAN*L401LANDSCAPE PLAN*SHEET INDEXLOCATION MAPPROJECT INFO:SITE ADDRESS:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 55356LOT SIZE:SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATIONLEGAL DESCRIPTION:SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATIONZONING:SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATIONBUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS:SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION AND VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR PROJECTJURISDICTION:CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTAOWNER:KILL3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 55356LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO3255 GARFIELD AVE. #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408GENERAL CONTRACTOR:ANDERSON REDA4920 LINCOLN DRIVE, EDINA, MN 55436SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC.14000 25th Ave N #120, Plymouth, MN 55447NORTH SHORE DRIVE W STUBBS BAYMAXWELL BAY13584146NORTH ARMcreation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L000.dwglast saved:HOME_FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:34 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275199 GENERAL NOTES1.USE OF THE WORD 'CONTRACTOR' IN THEDRAWINGS INDICATES BOTH THE GENERALCONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORSON THE PROJECT.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALLMATERIALS AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THESCOPE OF WORK AS INDICATED IN THEDOCUMENTS.3.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORSARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATINGTHEIR WORK WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS.NEITHER THE OWNER NOR THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATION OF THE WORK. NOADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADETO ANY CONTRACTOR FOR EXTRA WORKRESULTING FROM FAILURES OFCOORDINATION.4.THE CONTRACTOR MUST ASSURECOMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES,REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS ANDINSPECTIONS GOVERNING THE WORK ORMATERIALS SUPPLIED.5.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORAPPLYING FOR, OBTAINING, AND PAYING FORALL NECESSARY PERMITS, APPROVALS ANDINSPECTIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A COPY OFALL DRAWINGS WITH THEM ON SITE AT ALLTIMES AND SHALL RECORD ALLMODIFICATIONS/CHANGES TO THE WORK ONTHE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLPROVIDE A COMPLETE AS-BUILT SET OFDRAWINGS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTAT PROJECT COMPLETION.7.EXCEPT FOR ITEMS SPECIFICALLY MARKEDAS 'BY OTHERS' OR 'NOT IN CONTRACT', IT ISTHE INTENT OF THESE DRAWINGS TODESCRIBE A COMPLETE PROJECT. THECONTRACTOR MUST THOROUGHLY REVIEWTHE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BIDAND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONSDISCOVERED. NO ADDITIONALCOMPENSATION WILL BE MADE FOR ITEMS OFWORK NOT SHOWN OR DESCRIBED ON THEDRAWINGS THAT COULD BE REASONABLYINFERRED FROM THE DRAWINGS INPROVIDING THE OWNER WITH COMPLETESYSTEMS AND A COMPLETE PROJECT.8.EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS ARE FROM A SURVEY PERFORMEDBY OTHERS. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICFEATURES MAY NOT BE EXACT AS TO THEIRLOCATION, CHARACTER, OR NUMBER. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORVERIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF THE SITEPRIOR TO BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION ANDFOR IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYING THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THEDRAWINGS.9.THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN ANDPROTECT ALL BENCH MARKS, SURVEYMONUMENTS, PROPERTY IRONS, LAYOUTSTAKES AND OTHER REFERENCE POINTS. ALLFINES AND REPLACEMENT COSTS FORDAMAGE TO ANY OF THESE ITEMS THAT ISDUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S ACTS ORNEGLIGENCE ARE THE CONTRACTOR'SRESPONSIBILITY AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.10.THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD EXPECT TO FINDTELEPHONE, ELECTRIC, GAS, CABLETELEVISION, AND FIBER OPTIC LINES,IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, AND OTHER PUBLICAND PRIVATE UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR, INCOOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATEUTILITY COMPANY, IS RESPONSIBLE TOVERIFY THE LOCATION, SIZE, AND DEPTH OFALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY. AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANYCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTORMUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT800 252 1166 OR TO NOTIFY THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES ANDVERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE, ANDDEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES WITH THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES.11.ANY RELOCATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SHALLBE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANYAND ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITYCOMPANY, INCLUDING FEES, BONDS, PERMITSREQUIRED FOR SUCH WORK.12.PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLICRIGHT OF WAY, THE CONTRACTOR MUSTOBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS ANDSUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANCOMPLYING WITH THE LATEST EDITION OFTHE MNDOT ROADWAY REQUIREMENTS.13.DO NOT PROCEED WITH ANY PORTION OFWORK AS INDICATED IN THE DOCUMENTS IFOBSTRUCTIONS, DISCREPANCIES ORUNKNOWN CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED.NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELYON HOW BEST TO PROCEED.14.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ASAFE AND SECURE SITE THROUGHOUT THEPROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL,STATE, AND LOCAL SAFETY ORDINANCES.15.UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OFPROJECT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUESTIN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCEINSPECTION WITH THE OWNER ANDLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.CODES1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCAL CODES ANDALL OTHER GOVERNING AUTHORITIES HAVINGJURISDICTION.2.APPLICABLE CODES: THIS PROJECT IS TOCOMPLY WITH THE CITY OF ORONOMUNICIPAL CODE AND SUB-CODEREQUIREMENTS AND STATE OF MINNESOTACODE REQUIREMENTS.3.VERIFY IF THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRESPECIAL REVIEW AND APPROVALS FROM THEMINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT.SUBMITTALS / SHOP DRAWINGS / SITE MOCK-UPS1.CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS AND FIELD MOCKUPS TO THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR FINAL REVIEWAND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONFOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: PAVING, WALLS,FENCES, SPECIAL METAL FABRICATIONS &CONNECTIONS, SPECIAL FINISHES,SPECIALTY DETAILS, AND LIGHTING.2.MOCK-UPS WILL ESTABLISH EXPECTATIONSFOR QUALITY NAD WORKMANSHIP.3.MOCK-UPS WILL BE SET UP IN A SECUREDPORTION OF THE SITE FOR REFERENCETHROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINUNTIL PROJECT SITE CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETION.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW, STAMP, SIGNAND DATE ALL SUBMITTALS PRIOR TOFORWARDING TO ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. THEENGINEER’S REVIEW IS FOR CONFORMANCEWITH THE DESIGN CONCEPT AND GENERALCOMPLIANCE WITH THE RELEVANT CONTRACTDOCUMENTS. THE ARCHITECTS REVIEW DOESNOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE SOLERESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW, CHECK ANDCOORDINATE THE SUBMITTALS THECONTRACTOR REMAINS SOLELYRESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONSIN THE SUBMITTALS.5.ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL SUBMIT SHOPDRAWINGS AS REQUIRED FOR APPROVALPRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH ANY WORK.6.SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN THE FORM OFBLACK-LINE PRINTS OR PORTABLEDOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF) FOR REVIEW.EXISTING CONDITIONS / REMOVALS NOTES1.VERIFY AND STAKE ALL PROPERTY LINES ANDSTRUCTURE LOCATIONS PRIOR TOCOMMENCING WITH CONSTRUCTION.MAINTAIN PROPERTY LINE STAKES, CONTROLPOINTS, BENCH MARKS, AND OFFSET STAKESTHROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. ANY LOSTSURVEY MARKERS TO BE REPLACED BY THECONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTORSEXPENSE.2.THE LIMITS OF WORK INDICATED ONDRAWINGS, ARE GENERAL IN NATURE ANDARE INTENDED TO DEFINE THE GENERALVICINITY IN WHICH THE SCOPE OF WORKEXISTS. ACTUAL LIMITS OF WORK SHALLINCLUDE AREAS NECESSARY TO COMPLETETHE SCOPE OF DESIGN INTENT.3.THE CONTRACTOR MUST REVIEW THE LIMITSOF WORK WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO STARTING WORK. ANY WORKOUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK AS SHOWN ONTHE DRAWINGS OR AS MODIFIED IN THE FIELDBY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL BEDONE AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE UNLESSTHE CONTRACTOR NOTIFIES THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT OF THE NEED FOR THE WORK INWRITING AND IS DIRECTED TO PERFORM THEWORK BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNERBEFORE PERFORMING THE WORK.RESTORATION OR REPLACEMENT OF ANYPAVEMENTS, CURB, GUTTER, PLANTMATERIALS, TURF, UTILITIES, OR OTHER SITEELEMENTS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORKTHAT ARE DAMAGED DUE TO THECONTRACTOR'S ACTS OR NEGLIGENCE WILLBE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THEEXTENT AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THEREPLACEMENT WILL BE DETERMINED BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.4.A TREE PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED FORCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTORMUST SIGN ALL PERMITS AND PAY THEPERMIT FEE BEFORE STARTING WORK ANDMUST COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTSOF ALL GOVERNING AGENCIES INPERFORMING THE WORK OF THIS PROJECT.5.THE CONTRACTOR MUST MEET ANDIMPLEMENT ALL NPDES, SWPPP, ANDEROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS INEFFECT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION6.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLMEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANYREMOVAL WORK AND MUST BE MAINTAINEDUNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROLMEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETELYIMPLEMENTED AND ESTABLISHED.7.INSTALL SILT FENCING AROUND THEPERIMETER OF THE LIMITS OF WORK ANDMAINTAIN UNTIL PERMANENT EROSIONCONTROL IS ESTABLISHED. ALL SILT FENCEMUST HAVE GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC WITH STEELPOSTS. MACHINE SLICING OF SILT FENCEAROUND OR UNDER TREES WILL NOT BEPERMITTED. SILT FENCE AROUND OR UNDERTREES MUST BE HAND PLACED ANDFASTENED TO THE GROUND WITH STAPLES.8.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORREVIEWING THE EROSION CONTROLREQUIREMENTS OF THE SITE AND FORINSTALLING AND MAINTAINING EROSIONCONTROL MEASURES WHERE NEEDED, EVENIF THEY ARE NOT INDICATED ON THEDRAWINGS.9.INLET PROTECTION (SILT FENCE BARRICADES,SILT SACKS, RISER PIPES, OR FILTER FABRICAND GRAVEL) MUST BE INSTALLED IN ALLEXISTING AFFECTED CATCH BASINS PRIOR TOANY REMOVAL WORK AND IN ALL NEW CATCHBASINS IMMEDIATELY AFTER CATCH BASININSTALLATION.10.ADJACENT STREETS, ALLEYS, ANDPROPERTIES MUST BE SWEPT TO KEEP THEMFREE OF SEDIMENT AND MATERIALSTRACKED, BLOWN, OR WASHED FROM THESITE. CONTRACTOR MUST MONITORCONDITIONS AND SWEEP AS NEEDED ORWITHIN 24 HOURS NOTICE BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. SWEEPING IS INCIDENTAL TO THEPROJECT.11.CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN DUSTCONTROL FOR THE SITE AT ALL TIMES ANDPROVIDE WATERING TRUCKS AS NEEDED ORWITHIN 24 HOURS NOTICE BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. DUST CONTROL IS INCIDENTALTO THE PROJECT.12.WHERE DISTURBED SOILS WILL LAY EXPOSEDFOR MORE THAN 21 DAYS, THE CONTRACTORMUST SEED WITH A TEMPORARY COVERCROP TO PREVENT EROSION. TEMPORARYSEED MIX MUST BE APPROVED BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TEMPORARYSEEDING IS INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT.13.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLEFOR SECURING THE SITE AND PROVIDINGPROTECTION FROM THE WORK FOR THEPUBLIC. ALL OPEN EXCAVATIONS AND OTHERHAZARDS MUST BE FENCED.14.THE RELOCATION AND/OR PROTECTION OFALL EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BECOORDINATED BY THE CONTRACTOR ANDANY COSTS FOR SUCH WORK IS THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. NOADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BEALLOWED FOR EXTRA TIME AND EFFORT ORPROVISIONS NECESSARY TO WORK AROUNDANY UTILITIES.15.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TOREPORT ANY EXISTING DAMAGE OR FAULTYCONDITION OF ANY UTILITIES TO THE UTILITYOWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION AS, ONCE WORK HASCOMMENCED, IT WILL BE ASSUMED THAT ALLDAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND OR ABOVEGROUND INSTALLATIONS HAS BEEN CAUSEDBY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS AND ITWILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITYTO MAKE THE NECESSARY REPAIRS. UPONCOMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, CONTACT ALLUTILITY OWNERS AND MAKE ARRANGEMENTSFOR A FIELD INSPECTION TRIP BY AREPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONTRACTOR ANDREPRESENTATIVES OF THE UTILITY OWNERSTO CONFIRM THAT ALL DAMAGE CAUSED BYTHE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS HAVE BEENREPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THEOWNERS16.THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT ALLEXISTING ROADS, CURB, STRUCTURES,TREES, AND SITE ELEMENTS NOTDESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL. ANY DAMAGESHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED ATCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THESATISFACTION OF THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.17.ITEMS SHALL REMAIN UNTIL DESIGNATED FORREMOVAL. REMOVE DESIGNATION ITEMSSHOWN ON THE PLAN TO THE FULL DEPTH OFTHEIR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.18.VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DIMENSION OFITEMS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TOCOMMENCEMENT OF WORK.19.ALL CONCRETE AND ASPHALT REMOVALSHALL BE SAW CUT. EDGES OF MATERIALSTO REMAIN SHALL BE SHORED UP ANDPROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOPRESERVE EDGE INTACT. REPAIRS TODAMAGED EDGES TO BE DONE WITH CAREAND AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.20.ITEMS ENCOUNTERED BELOW GRADE ANDNOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BEBROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.21.SALVAGE EXISTING MATERIALS AS INDICATEDON THE PLANS. REMOVE SALVAGEDMATERIALS AS INDICATED WITH CARE ANDSTORE ON SITE IF APPLICABLE, CLEAN ALLDEBRIS AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL FROMSALVAGED ITEMS AND REUSE AS DIRECTEDBY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.22.REMOVE DEMOLISHED MATERIALS FROM SITE.DISPOSAL BY BURNING AND/OR BURYING ISPROHIBITED. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL ANDDEBRIS MUST BE DISPOSED OF INACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OFANY AND ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIESHAVING JURISDICTION OVER THIS PROJECT.23.RELOCATE / TRANSPLANT EXISTING PLANTMATERIAL AS INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGSAS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. MAINTAIN TRANSPLANTED PLANTMATERIAL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.24.EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE ADEQUATELYSHORED, BRACED AND SHEETED SO THATEARTH WILL NOT SETTLE AND SO THATEXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OF ANY KIND WILLBE FULLY PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ANYDAMAGE RESULTING FROM LACK OFSHORING, BRACING AND SHEETING SHALL BETHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTORAND SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THESATISFACTION OF THE OWNER.TREE PRESERVATION1.PROTECT ALL TREES DESIGNATED TO BESAVED AND ALL HARDWOOD TREES 6 INCHESOR GREATER IN DIAMETER THAT ARE NOTSPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL.2.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTACTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO VISIT SITE ANDVERIFY TREES TO BE SAVED. CONTRACTORMUST REVIEW THE DRAWINGS AND DAILYWORK SCHEDULE SO THAT, SHOULDPROPOSED GRADES POSE A HAZARD TO A'TREE TO BE SAVED', THE CONTRACTOR'SWORK IS NOT IMPEDED AND THERE WILL BETIME TO STUDY THE ISSUE.3.WHERE EXISTING TREES AND/OR SIGNIFICANTSHRUB MASSINGS ARE FOUND ON SITE,WHETHER SHOWN ON THE EXISTINGCONDITIONS PLAN OR NOT, THEY SHALL BEPROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE OR UNLESS DIRECTED BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO BE REMOVEDAND/OR ARE IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. ANYQUESTION REGARDING WHETHER PLANTMATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN OR NOT SHALL BEBROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL.4.ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED AS INDICATIONON LANDSCAPE EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDREMOVALS PLAN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY 6’HEIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCING. THE FENCESHALL BE LOCATED AT A MINIMUM AROUNDTHE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE FOR ALL TREES(SEE TREE PROTECTION FENCING DETAILS).THE FENCE SHALL BE FIRMLY ANCHOREDINTO THE GROUND AND SHALL REMAINUPRIGHT AND INTACT UNTIL ALLCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE.BARRIER FENCES MAY BE USED TO PROTECTTREES OUTSIDE OF THE MAIN CONSTRUCTIONAREAS. BARRIER FENCES SHALL CONSIST OFSAFETY-CAPPED REBAR POSTS PLACED NOMORE THAN 8 FEET ON CENTER WITH 4 FOOTHIGH ORANGE SQUARE MESH BARRIERFENCING, RESINET SLM40, OR EQUAL,ATTACHED TO POSTS. BARRIER FENCE MUSTBE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF THEDRIP-LINE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDMUST NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL FINALLANDSCAPING IS TO BE COMPLETED.5.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OR STORAGESHALL NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE TREEPROTECTED AREAS. THE CONTRACTORSHALL STAKE OR MARK OUT ALL TREEPROTECTION FENCING LOCATIONS ON SITEFOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO COMMENCING WITHCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON SITE.6.THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO WATER,FERTILIZE AND ATTEND TO OTHERMAINTENANCE NEEDS OF THE EXISTINGTREES AS NEEDED PER THE ARBORIST’SRECOMMENDATIONS TO MAINTAIN HEALTHYGROWTH THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTIONPERIOD. PROVIDE 6” PROTECTIVE LAYER OFHARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL EXISTINGTREES WITHIN CRITICAL WORK AREAS.SPREAD CHIPS USING HAND TOOLS ONLY,SUCH AS SHOVELS AND WHEEL BARRELS.7.WHEN EXCAVATION IS TO OCCUR NEAR ATREE THAT IS TO BE PROTECTED MUST BECARRIED OUT, DAMAGE CAN BE LIMITED BYROOT PRUNING. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BECOMPLETED BEFORE GRADING HAS STARTEDAND SHALL OCCUR BENEATH THEPROTECTIVE FENCING AS SHOWN ON THEPLANS.8.ROOT PRUNING FOR PROTECTED TREESSHALL BE PERFORMED WITH A TRENCHINGMACHINE PRIOR TO ADJACENT EXCAVATIONCOMMENCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLSTAKE THE LIMIT OF ROOT PRUNING ASINDICATED ON THE PLANS. LIMITS OFTRENCHING SHALL BE APPROVED BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANYTRENCHING IN THE FIELD. DO NOT TRENCHFOR IRRIGATION OR ELECTRICAL WITHIN DRIPLINES OF EXISTING TREES. COORDINATE ALLTRENCHING REQUIRED FOR UTILITY WORKWITH LANDSCAPE PLANS.IF ROOTS OF TREES DESIGNATED TO BESAVED ARE EXPOSED, CUT OR OTHERWISEBROKEN AND DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTIONOPERATIONS, THEY MUST BE IMMEDIATELYAND CLEANLY ROOT PRUNED WITH A SHARPAXE OR PRUNER. NOTIFY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT OF ANY EXPOSED ROOTS THATREQUIRE PRUNING PRIOR TO COMMENCINGWITH WORK. NO ROOTS OVER 3” IN DIA.SHALL BE PRUNED WITHOUT REVIEW BYARBORIST AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.9.LIMIT SOIL COMPACTION BY LIMITCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AROUND EXISTINGPRESERVED TREE CRITICAL ROOT ZONES.THIS INCLUDES RESTRICTING ALL TRAFFICAND STORAGE OF MATERIALS FROM UNDERTHESE AREAS.10.ANY PRUNING OF EXISTING PROTECTEDTREES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY ACERTIFIED ARBORIST AS DIRECTED BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.SOIL PREPARATION NOTES1.SOIL PREPARATION IS CRITICAL IN CREATINGA HEALTHY AND LONG-LASTING LANDSCAPE.REMOVE EXISTING TOPSOIL AND STOCKPILEON SITE FOR USE AT A LATER DATE.2.CONDUCT A SOIL EVALUATION OF EXISTINGSTOCKPILED TOPSOIL TO BE USED TODETERMINE THE SOILS COMPOSITION,COMPACTION RATE, NUTRIENT QUALITIES,ORGANIC CONTENT, PH LEVELS AND WATERHOLDING CAPABILITIES. THE IDEAL PARTICLESOIL MIX IS APPROXIMATELY 45% SAND, 40%SILT, 10% CLAY, AND 5% ORGANIC MATERIALSWITH A PH LEVEL NEAR SEVEN.3.PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPE ANDIRRIGATION SYSTEM, CONTRACTOR TOPREPARE SOIL TO ENSURE A PROPERENVIRONMENT FOR PLANT ROOTDEVELOPMENT.4.CONTRACTOR TO DECOMPACT SOILS INPLANTING AREAS BY ROTO-TILLING, DISC ORRIPPING SOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12”.DECOMPACTING OF SMALLER PLANTINGAREAS SUCH AS PARKING AREAS ANDAROUND STRUCTURES, MAY REQUIRE THEREMOVAL OF COMPACTED SOILS TO A DEPTHOF 18” OR MORE AND THEN REPLACEMENTWITH NEW OR AMENDED SOILS. REMOVALALL DEBRIS 2” OR GREATER FROM NEW ORAMENDED SOILS.5.WHEN PERFORMING SOIL DECOMPACTION,MULTIPLE PASSES ACROSS THE AREA MAY BEREQUIRED. WHEN POSSIBLE VARYDIRECTIONS OF DECOMPACTION TO ENSUREADEQUATE COVERAGE. WHEN USING A DISCOR RIPPING EQUIPMENT, IT IS REQUIREDTHAT THE FINAL PASSES OVER THE ARE BEMADE WITH A ROTO-TILLER TO BREAK UP ANYLARGE CLUMPS TO MAKE FINAL GRADINGEASIER.6.AFTER INITIAL SOIL DECOMPACTIONPROCEDURES ARE PERFORMED, SOILAMENDMENTS SHOULD BE ADDED. THEADDITION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BEDETERMINED FROM SOIL TESTINGCONDUCTED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITHCONSTRUCTION. SOIL AMENDMENT MAYINCLUDE INORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH ASSAND, SILT OR CLAY, WHICH HELP IMPROVESOIL TEXTURE. ORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH ASCOMPOST, MANURE, AND PEAT MOSS MAYALSO BE USED AND HELP IMPROVE SOILSTRUCTURE. OTHER AMENDMENTS SUCH ASFERTILIZER IMPROVE NUTRIENT CONTENTAND SULFUR ADJUSTS THE SOIL PH LEVEL.SULFUR SHALL BE INCORPORATED AT THERATE OF ONE POUND OF SULFUR PER 100SQUARE FEET.7.ALL AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE MIXEDTHOROUGHLY WITH EXISTING SOIL. ANADDITIONAL SOIL TEST SHALL BE TAKEN TOENSURE PROPER SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TOPLANTING.8.DURING THE REMAINDER OF THE LANDSCAPEINSTALLATION, VARIOUS AREAS OF THE SITEMAY BE RE-COMPACTED DUE TO THE USE OFEQUIPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC.DECOMPACT ANY AREAS THAT BECOMERE-COMPACTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFFINAL LANDSCAPING COMMENCES.LAYOUT NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TOACCURATELY SURVEY AND LAYOUT THEPROPOSED WORK FOR CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFYGRADES, LINES, LEVELS, DIMENSIONS PRIORTO COMMENCING WITH WORK. NOTEDDIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENT OVER SCALEDDIMENSION, LARGER SCALE OVER SMALLERSCALE, ADDENDA AND CLARIFICATION OVERPREVIOUS DOCUMENTS.2.CONTRACTOR TO LAY OUT PROPOSEDLOCATIONS FOR ALL HARDSCAPE, WALLS,AND SITE ELEMENTS AND VERIFY LAYOUTWITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. HARDSCAPE, WALLS ANDSITE ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED ON THELAYOUT PLAN. ANY DISCREPANCIES ORCONFLICTS WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONSOR OTHER DRAWINGS SHALL BE REPORTEDTO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELYFOR CLARIFICATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT.3.FOR DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS,PROPOSED BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS ANDRELATED WORK, REFER TO ARCHITECTURALDRAWINGS4.WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE CALLED AS “EQUAL,”SPACE REFERENCED ITEMS EQUALLY,MEASURED TO CENTERLINE.5.MEASUREMENTS ARE TO FACE OF BUILDING,WALL, FIXED SITE ELEMENT, GRID LINE ORDEFINED PROPERTY LINE IRON / BENCHMARKS. DIMENSIONS TO CENTER LINE AREAS INDICATED.6.INSTALL INTERSECTING ELEMENTS AT 90DEGREE ANGLES TO EACH OTHER UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7.PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS WHERECONCRETE FLAT WORK MEETS VERTICALSTRUCTURES SUCH AS WALLS, CURBS, STEPSAND BUILDING ELEMENTS.8.PROPOSED SURFACES SHALL MEET EXISTINGSURFACES WITH A SMOOTH ANDCONTINUOUS TRANSITION AND FLUSH ALONGENTIRE EDGE9.EXPANSION JOINTS IN CONCRETE WALKSSHALL BE LOCATED NOT MORE THAN TWENTYFEET (20’-0” O.C.) MAXIMUM OR AS INDICATEDON THE PLANS.10.VERIFY ALL JOINTING LAYOUTS FORCONCRETE IN FIELD PRIOR TOIMPLEMENTATION. ALL CONTROL JOINTS INCONCRETE TO SAW CUT UNLESS APPROVEDBY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.11.LAYOUT OF PROPOSED TRAILS TO BE STAKEDOUT BY CONTRACTORS AND APPROVED BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN FIELD.GRADING NOTES1.EXCAVATION, BACKFILL AND COMPACTIONSHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITHGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORTRECOMMENDATIONS.2.PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGEAWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES AT ALL TIMES.3.ALL DESIGN CONTOURS AND PROPOSEDELEVATIONS INDICATED ARE TO FINISHGRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCOUNT FOR ALLIMPORTED SURFACE AND PLANTINGMATERIALS IN DETERMINING EARTHWORKREQUIREMENTS5.GRADING OPERATIONS MUST MINIMIZE THEPOTENTIAL FOR EROSION.6.NO GRADING, STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS,OR STAGING IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE THELIMITS OF WORK.7.PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING THE SITE, THECONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL INAREAS TO BE DISTURBED AND STOCKPILE ONSITE FOR FUTURE USE. EXCESS TOPSOILMUST BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AFTERFINISH GRADING AT THE CONTRACTOR'SEXPENSE.8.IF THE EARTHWORK FOR THE SITE ISANTICIPATED TO PRODUCE AN EXCESS OFMATERIAL, THE CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVEALL EXCESS MATERIAL FROM THE SITE ANDDISPOSE OF IT AT THE CONTRACTOR'SEXPENSE.9.NO TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROMSEEDING AND/OR RESTORATION AREASWITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.10.TOPSOIL COMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTIONTRAFFIC IN SEEDING AND/ OR RESTORATIONAREAS OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE LOOSENEDUNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.11.COMPOST SHALL BE MECHANICALLYINTEGRATED INTO THE TOP 6" OF EXISTINGSOIL BY MEANS OF ROTO-TILLING AFTERCROSS-RIPPING. GROUND COVER &PERENNIAL BED AREAS SHALL BE AMENDEDAT A RATE OF 8 CUBIC FEET PER THOUSANDSQUARE FEET OF NITROGEN STABILIZEDORGANIC AMENDMENT AND 10 LBS. OF12-12-12 FERTILIZER PER CU. YD.,ROTO-TILLED TO A DEPTH OF 8". NO MANUREOR ANIMAL-BASED PRODUCTS SHALL BEUSED FOR ORGANIC AMENDMENTS.12.THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY DIRECT ONSITE CHANGES TO THE GRADING TO SUITACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND TO ACHIEVEDESIGN INTENT. SUCH CHANGES SHALL BEDONE AT THE NO INCREASE TO THE PRICE OFTHE CONTRACTED WORK.13.THE TOPS OF EXISTING MANHOLES, INLETSTRUCTURES AND SANITARY CLEANOUTSMAY BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO MATCHPROPOSED GRADES IN ACCORDANCE WITHALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS.14.STORM WATER ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS AREBASED UPON PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURALPLANS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TOAND FOR VERIFYING LOCATIONS ON FINALARCHITECTURAL PLANS.SEEDING NOTES1.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE WARRANTEDBY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF TWOYEARS AFTER OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANYACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAYOCCUR PRIOR TO THE OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITYOF THE CONTRACTOR.2.SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOTSPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED AS STRUCTURE,HARD SURFACE, PLANTING AREAS OR LAWN.3.THE SEEDING CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFYTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF THEPROPOSED SEEDING START DATE A MINIMUMOF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO SEEDING.4.METHOD OF SEEDING AND SEEDING RATESHALL BE AS LISTED ON SEEDING KEY.5.NO SEEDING MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILLBE ACCEPTED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR,PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/ORQUOTATION, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.THE SEEDING / RESTORATION CONTRACTORSHALL KEEP NEWLY SEEDED AREASWATERED FOR A MINIMUM OF 4 WEEKS ORUNTIL SEED IS 80% ESTABLISHED. SPRINGSEEDING COMPLETED AFTER MAY 15TH MUSTBE WATERED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ATLEAST 4 WEEKS, OR UNTIL AUGUST 15TH,WHICHEVER IS LONGER. THE SEEDING /RESTORATION CONTRACTOR MUST ALSOPROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A BID FORINDIVIDUAL WATERING APPLICATIONS WITHINTHE TWO YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD FORPOTENTIAL WATERING DURING UNUSUALLYDRY PERIODS.7.EROSION CONTROL MATTING MUST BE USEDON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1.8.SEEDING IN RESTORATION AREAS WILLFOLLOW PROCEDURES LISTED IN“RESTORATION NOTES.”9.EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS REQUIRED INRESTORATION AREAS SHALL BE INSTALLEDBY THE SEEDING / RESTORATIONCONTRACTOR.PLANTING NOTES1.EXACT LOCATION OF PLANT AREAS ANDMATERIALS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THERIGHT TO ADJUST PLANTINGS TO EXACTLOCATIONS IN THE FIELD.2.VERIFY PLANT COUNTS AND SQUAREFOOTAGES: QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FORREFERENCE ONLY. IF QUANTITIES ON PLANTLIST DIFFER FROM GRAPHIC INDICATIONS ONPLANS, THEN THE GREATER NUMBER /QUANTITY SHALL PREVAIL. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR QUANTITY TAKE OFFS ANDSHALL PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE OFPLANTING AREAS AS INDICATED ONDRAWINGS. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTOF ANY PLANTING DISCREPANCIES.3.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTEDBY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF ONEYEAR AFTER OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM ORDAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO THEOWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BETHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.4.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE THEDECOMPACTED SUBGRADE AFTERDECOMPACTION WORK IS COMPLETE ANDPRIOR TO TOPSOIL PLACEMENT.5.PROVIDE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL FOR ALLLAWN TURF AREAS. PROVIDE A MINIMUMOF12 INCHES OF PLANTING SOIL MIXCONSISTING OF 1/3 TOPSOIL, 1/3 SAND, AND1/3 COMPOST IN ALL SHRUB AND PERENNIALBEDS. WHERE SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS AREGROUPED, CREATE ONE CONTINUOUSPLANTING BED. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TOAPPROVE TOPSOIL PRIOR TO SPREADING.CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT TESTINGRESULTS AND FERTILIZERRECOMMENDATIONS.6.ALL NEW TREE PLANTINGS AND EDGEDPLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3 INCH DEPTHOF DOUBLE- SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.ALL NEW EDGED GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGBEDS TO RECEIVE 3 INCH DEPTH OF PINEBARK MULCH. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TOAPPROVE MULCH PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.7.ALL PLANTING BEDS NOT CONTAINED BYSTRUCTURES, CURB, OR PAVING MUST BEEDGED WITH METAL EDGING (ALUMINUM ORSTEEL).8.WHERE LAWN / SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES,FINISHED GRADE OF SOD MUST BE HELD 1INCH BELOW THE SURFACE ELEVATION OFTHE PAVED SURFACE.9.SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THECONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGEREDJOINTS.10.STAKE ALL PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS INFIELD FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TOINSTALLATION. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTRESERVES RIGHTS TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTSTO LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING.11.ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE STAKED ASSHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR ASDIRECTED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTMUST APPROVE ALL STAKING LOCATIONS OFPLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIEDAT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THEDELIVERY DATE FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL.12.PAINT OR STRING ALL NEW PLANTING AREASAND LOCATIONS IN FIELD FOR LANDSCAPEARCHITECT APPROVAL. ADJUSTMENT INLOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALMAY BE NEEDED IN THE FIELD. SHOULD ANADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED.13.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEARLYIDENTIFIED (COMMON OR LATINNOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICHSHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL.14.ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL MEET ANDCONFORM TO “THE AMERICAN STANDARDSFOR NURSERY STOCK”, ANSI, LATESTWRITTEN STANDARDS AND CONSTITUTEMINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR ALLPLANT MATERIAL.15.AN INSPECTION TO APPROVE PLANTMATERIAL AT THE NURSERY SHALL OCCURPRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TOPROVIDE 48 HOUR NOTIFICATION TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.16.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZEDUPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEALOR OTHER FERTILIZER AS INDICATED MIXEDIN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THEMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.17.ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PERPLANTING DETAILS.18.WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES FROM THEGROUND TO THE FIRST BRANCH. WRAPPINGMATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVYWATERPROOF CREPE PAPERMANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAPALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALLPRIOR TO DECEMBER 1ST, AND REMOVE ALLWRAPPING BETWEEN MAY 1ST AND JUNE 1ST,OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.19.IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVESANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANTSELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS, OR ANYOTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHTNEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIALESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE,LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRINGTHESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OFTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT20.NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BEACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTEDOF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THELANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THESUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION.ANY SUBSTITUTION IS REQUIRED TOAPPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.21.PROVIDE MATCHING FORMS AND SIZES FORPLANT MATERIALS WITHIN EACH SPECIES ANDSIZE DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. ALL PLANTMATERIAL SHALL MEET SIZE AND QUALITYSTANDARDS AS INDICATED IN DOCUMENTSAND SHALL BE OF TOP QUALITY ANDVIGOROUS HEALTH. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTRESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT PLANTSNOT MEETING THESE STANDARDS.22.ALIGN AND EQUALLY SPACE PLANTINGS INALL DIRECTIONS AS DESIGNATED ON THEPLANS.23.FINISH GRADE OF PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE1” BELOW ADJACENT PAVING OR SURFACINGAREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED24.ALL TREES PLANTED ADJACENT TO PUBLICAND/OR PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SHALL BEPRUNED CLEAR OF ALL BRANCHES BETWEENGROUND AND A HEIGHT OF EIGHT (8) FEETFOR THAT PORTION OF THE PLAN LOCATEDOVER THE SIDEWALK AND/OR ROAD.25.PRUNE NEWLY PLANTED TREES AND SHEARNEWLY PLANTED HEDGES AS DIRECTED BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.26.PROTECT ALL NEW EVERGREEN PLANTINGSFROM WINTER BURN BY WRAPPING NEWPLANTINGS WITH BURLAP. MAINTAINTHROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD.27.TREE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLEDWHERE TREES ARE PLACED WITHIN 5 FEET OFEXISTING OR NEW PAVEMENT SURFACES.THE ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED ONTHE SIDE OF THE TREE PIT CLOSEST TO THEIMPROVEMENTS. DO NOT ENCLOSE ROOTBALL FOR TREES WITH ROOT BARRIER.28.ALL PLANTING AREAS ON SLOPES OVER 4:1SHALL RECEIVE COCONUT FIBER EROSIONCONTROL NETTING FROM ROLLS. NETTINGSHALL BE #CT-125, AS MANUFACTURED BYNORTH AMERICAN GREEN (OR EQUAL).INSTALL AND STAKE PER MANUFACTURER'SSPECIFICATIONS.29.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTENREQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCEINSPECTION UPON COMPLETION OF ALLPLANTING WORK30.PLANTING IN SEEDING AND/OR RESTORATIONAREAS WILL FOLLOW PROCEDURES LISTED IN“SEEDING NOTES” AND “RESTORATIONNOTES.”31.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS OFPROJECT UNTIL SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETIONOF PROJECT.32.AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION ALL PLANTMATERIAL SHALL BE IN HEALTHY, VIGOROUSGROWING CONDITION, PLANTED IN FULLACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS ANDSPECIFICATIONS.IRRIGATION NOTES1.IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN / BUILD.AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BEINSTALLED TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR ALLPLANTING AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. LOWVOLUME EQUIPMENT SHALL PROVIDESUFFICIENT WATER FOR PLAN GROWTH WITHA MINIMUM WATER LOSS DUE TO WATER RUNOFF. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL USE HIGHQUALITY, AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES,CONTROLLERS AND OTHER NECESSARYIRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. ALL COMPONENTSSHALL BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIALS. ALLDRIP SYSTEMS SHALL BE ADEQUATELYFILTERED AND REGULATED PER THEMANUFACTURER’S RECOMMENDED DESIGNPARAMETERS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMITSHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL OF SYSTEMPRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2.IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL OPERATE ONPOTABLE WATER, AND THE SYSTEM WILLHAVE APPROPRIATE BACKFLOW PREVENTIONDEVICES INSTALLED TO PREVENTCONTAMINATION OF THE POTABLE SOURCE.3.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNEDAND INSTALLED, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENTPOSSIBLE, TO CONSERVE WATER BY USINGTHE FOLLOWING DEVICES AND SYSTEMS:MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATETECHNOLOGY ON ROTOR AND SPRAY HEADS(WHEREVER POSSIBLE), RAIN SENSORS, ANDMULTI-PROGRAM COMPUTERIZED IRRIGATIONCONTROLLERS FEATURING SENSORY INPUTCAPABILITIES.4.ALL LAWN, PLANTING AREAS AND NEW TREEPLANTINGS WITHIN PROPERTY LIMITS MUSTBE IRRIGATED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.NEW SEEDING AND / OR RESTORATION AREASTO BE IRRIGATED SEPARATELY AS INDICATEDON DRAWINGS.5.ALL NEW PLANTING BEDS, NEW TREEPLANTINGS, GREEN ROOFS AND CONTAINERPLANTINGS TO RECEIVE DRIP LINE EMITTERIRRIGATION. ALL TURF / LAWN, SEEDED AND /OR RESTORATION AREAS TO RECEIVEOVERHEAD SPRAY IRRIGATION.6.PROPOSED IRRIGATION LAYOUTS ANDMATERIAL LISTS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHBIDS. ACCEPTABLE PRODUCTMANUFACTURERS INCLUDE RAINBIRD, TORO,AND NETAFIM. THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLERSHALL BE SIZED TO ACCOMMODATE ALLPROPOSED ZONES, INCLUDING ANY AREASINDICATED AS FUTURE IRRIGATION, ANDSHALL BE FULLY AUTOMATIC WITH AVOLATILE MEMORY CHIP.7.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THELOCATION OF ALL IRRIGATION SLEEVES. IFADDITIONAL SLEEVING IS REQUIRED,IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. ONLY TRENCHLESS METHODSWILL BE APPROVED AFTER PAVING ISCOMPLETED.8.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A COMPLETEIRRIGATION SYSTEM FROM THE POINT OFCONNECTION AT THE COLD WATER STUB OUTLINE(S) FROM THE BUILDING. THE STUBOUT(S) FROM THE BUILDING, THE BACKFLOWPREVENTER, AND OTHER CODE REQUIREDPLUMBING ELEMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED BYA LICENSED MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR.9.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALLTHE IRRIGATION CONTROL PANEL IN THELOCATION INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ORAS APPROVED BY THE OWNER / LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. COORDINATE LOCATION W/APPLICABLE TRADES.10.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUSTPROVIDE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCEMANUALS AND ON-SITE INSTRUCTION TO THEOWNER IN THE SYSTEM OPERATION. THEIRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR INITIAL SYSTEM STARTUP,WINTERIZATION FOR THE FIRST WINTER, ANDSTARTUP THE FOLLOWING SPRING.11.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDEIRRIGATION COVERAGE FOR ALL SEEDING /RESTORATION AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE WITH SEEDING / RESTORATIONCONTRACTOR REGARDING IRRIGATIONSYSTEM SCHEDULE AND IRRIGATION NEEDSIN RESTORATION AREAS.12.ALL SPRAY AND ROTOR HEAD LOCATIONSSHALL BE STAKED, FLAGGED AND/OROTHERWISE CLEARLY MARKED ON THEGROUND PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.SPRINKLER HEAD STAKING SHALL BEINSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE OR THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT BEFORE INSTALLATION. STAKEDLOCATIONS SHALL BE SPACED TO PROVIDEHEAD-TO-HEAD COVERAGE.13.SET SPRINKLER HEADS PERPENDICULAR TOFINISH GRADE OF AREAS TO BE IRRIGATEDUNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.14.ADJUST IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT FORANY VERTICAL OBSTRUCTIONS ORINTERFERENCE. DO NOT OVERSPRAY ONTOWALKS, ROADWAYS, WALLS, FENCES AND /OR BUILDING STRUCTURES.15.IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE BASED ONMINIMUM PRESSURE AND MAXIMUM FLOWDEMAND. VERIFY WATER PRESSURE BEFORESTART OF CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANYDIFFERENCES IN WATER PRESSUREREADINGS AT IRRIGATION POINT OFCONNECTION PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITHIMPLEMENTATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM.16.IF EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BERETAINED FOR REUSE, CONTRACTOR SHALLPROPOSE ALL REQUIRED ADDITIONS TOEXISTING SYSTEM NECESSARY TO OBTAINFULL COVERAGE OF ALL LANDSCAPE WORKAS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS AND PROVIDE ADESIGN BUILD DRAWING IDENTIFYINGEXISTING AND PROPOSED IRRIGATIONSYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR INSTALLATION.17.PROVIDE AS-BUILT DRAWING OF FINALIRRIGATION SYSTEM TO OWNER / LANDSCAPEARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. UPONCOMPLETION OF INSTALLATION OFIRRIGATION SYSTEM, IRRIGATIONCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THEFOLLOWING:·ACCURATE AND COMPLETE "AS BUILT"PLANS OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING8-1/2"x11" ZONE MAP TO BE PLACED INSIDEEACH CONTROLLER BOX.·A LOG ON ALL WATER WINDOWS, RUNSCHEDULE TIMES, AND OTHER CHANGESAND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE IRRIGATIONSYSTEM SINCE INSTALLATION.·ONE HOUR OF TRAINING TO OWNER ONIRRIGATION SYSTEM AND CONTROLLEROPERATION.·THREE OF EACH TYPE OF HEAD ANDEMITTER INSTALLED.·ONE OF EACH TYPE OF VALVE INSTALLED.·REVIEW WINTERIZATION PROCEDURES FORIRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE.SITE LIGHTING NOTES1.THE LIGHTING PLAN IS INTENDED TO SHOWTHE LOCATIONS AND TYPE OF LUMINAIREFIXTURES ONLY. POWER SYSTEMS, CONDUIT,WIRING, VOLTAGES AND OTHER ELECTRICALCOMPONENTS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE CONTRACTOR. EXTERIOR LIGHTINGTYPES SHALL CONSIST PRIMARILY OF LOWVOLTAGE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.2.ALL LANDSCAPE LIGHTING AND THEIRCOMPONENTS SHALL MEET THE UL1838GOVERNING STANDARDS.3.CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT OF ANY LIGHTING LOCATIONSTHAT CONFLICT WITH DRAINAGE, UTILITIESOR OTHER STRUCTURES.4.COORDINATE PROPOSED POWER SOURCESFOR ALL SITE LIGHTING ELEMENTS AND THEIRLOCATIONS.5.COORDINATE SWITCHING AND CONTROLSSYSTEMS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING WITHOWNER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. VERIFY ALLSWITCH LOCATIONS ON SITE PRIOR TOINSTALLATION.6.INSTALL LIGHT FIXTURES PERMANUFACTURER’S RECOMMENDATIONS ANDPER LOCAL, STATE, AND NATIONALREGULATIONS.7.ALL LIGHTING IN PAVEMENT AND HARDSCAPETO BE CORE DRILLED. VERIFY FINALLOCATIONS IN HARDSCAPE AREAS PRIOR TODRILLING..8.ALL LIGHT POLE BASES SHALL BE DESIGNEDAND SIGNED OFF BY A STRUCTURALENGINEER.9.ALL ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOXES FOREXTERIOR LIGHTS SHALL BE LOCATED INPLANTING AREAS OR OTHER DISCRETELOCATIONS AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.10.ALL TRANSFORMERS SHOULD BE SIZED TOALLOW FOR ANY FUTURE INCREASE INSYSTEM LOAD, AS WELL AS THE RESISTIVEVALUES ASSOCIATED WITH LONGER CABLERUN DISTANCES AND THE USE OF VOLTAGETAPS GREATER THAN 12-VOLT. INSTALLTRANSFORMERS PER MANUFACTURER’SRECOMMENDATIONS.11.ALL 120-VOLT ELECTRICAL WORK SHOULD BEPERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIANUNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY LAW.REFER TO ALL NEC AND ALL LOCAL CODESFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.12.ALL EXTERIOR RECEPTACLE BOXES SHOULDBE G.F.C.I.-PROTECTED FOR USE WITHTRANSFORMERS THAT UTILIZE A PLUG-INCORD. ALL RECEPTACLE BOXES SHOULDUTILIZE AN “IN-USE” OR “BUBBLE” TYPERECEPTACLE COVER TO PROTECT IT FROMWATER ENTRY.13.ALL RECEPTACLES, LOW VOLTAGETRANSFORMERS, AND FIXTURES CANNOT BELOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF ANY WATERSOURCE THAT WOULD BE NORMALLYOCCUPIED BY HUMANS.14.EXTERIOR LIGHTING SYSTEM SHALLCONNECT TO EITHER PHOTOCELL ORASTRONOMICAL TIMER. VERIFY FINALLIGHTING CONTROLS WITH OWNER ANDLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION.RESTORATION NOTES1.ALL EXOTICS, INVASIVE AND UNDESIRED TALLNATIVE SPECIES TARGETED FOR REMOVALWILL BE REMOVED BY HAND OR SPRAYEDWITH APPROVED HERBICIDE. THIS WORKSHALL BEGIN DURING THE FIRST STAGES OFCONSTRUCTION AND EXTEND THROUGH THEMANAGEMENT PERIOD.2.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVEMANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF NATIVE SPECIESTO BE LEFT AND MANAGED ON SITE.3.RESTORATION PLANTING AND SEEDING SHALLBEGIN AFTER ALL CONSTRUCTION AND TREEPLANTING WORK IS COMPLETE AND THEIRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLED BY OTHERSIS IN PLACE.4.RESTORATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF THEPLANTING AND SEEDING START DATE AMINIMUM OF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO SEEDINGAND PLANTING.5.SALVAGED TOPSOIL APPROVED BY THERESTORATION CONTRACTOR WILL BESPREAD ONLY ON AREAS CLEARED OFTOPSOIL DURING CONSTRUCTION.APPROVED TOPSOIL WILL ONLY BE SPREADTO THE ORIGINAL GRADE OR GRADEAPPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.SEVERELY COMPACTED SOIL CAUSED BYCONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL BELOOSENED TO ORIGINAL GRADE BY OTHERS.MINOR COMPACTION SHALL BE LOOSENED BYRESTORATION CONTRACTOR TO ORIGINALGRADE OR GRADE APPROVED BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.7.SEEDING SHALL BE HAND BROADCAST ANDRAKED EITHER BY HAND OR WITH A DRAGHARROW.8.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTEDBY THE RESTORATION CONTRACTOR FOR APERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER OWNER'SWRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OFVANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCURPRIOR TO THE OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITYOF THE CONTRACTOR.9.SEEDED AND SODDED AREAS SHALL BEWATERED WITH THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM(INSTALLED BY OTHERS) FOR A MINIMUM OFFOUR WEEKS OR UNTIL SEED ISESTABLISHED. ALL WATERING ASSUMES ASYSTEM COVERING ALL RESTORATION AREASIS IN PLACE AND RESTORATION CONTRACTORHAS CONTROL OVER WATERING SCHEDULEFOR RESTORATION AREAS.10.PLANTINGS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TOSPECIFIC ZONE SECTION NEEDS AND NOTACCORDING TO A FIXED PATTERN.ON-CENTER GOALS ARE ON AVERAGE.11.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALLSEEDING LOCATIONS PRIOR TO SEEDING.12.NO FERTILIZER OR SOIL AMENDMENTS AREREQUIRED IN THE RESTORATION AREASUNLESS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THERESTORATION CONTRACTOR.13.RESTORATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDEA WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNERACCEPTANCE INSPECTION UPONCOMPLETION OF ALL RESTORATION SEEDINGAND PLANTING WORK.WARRANTY1.ALL HARDSCAPE AND PAVING AREAS TO BEWARRANTED FOR 1 YEAR AFTER OWNERACCEPTANCE.2.ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE WARRANTED FOR1 YEAR AFTER OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANINSPECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL WILLOCCUR AFTER THE FIRST YEAR FOLLOWINGSUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION / OWNERACCEPTANCE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSHALL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTORS OFINSPECTION DATE. REPLACEMENTS MAY BEREQUIRED AT THIS TIME. REPLACEMENTSSHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 30 DAYS FROMTHE DATE OF INSPECTION UNLESSOTHERWISE DIRECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITHACCEPTED HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES.LANDSCAPE STRUCTURAL NOTES1.BUILDING CODE: CONFORM TO LATESTEDITION OF STATE BUILDING CODE ANDINTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC).2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELYRESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS ANDMETHODS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FOR THESAFETY OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORCOMPLYING WITH ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONSAND REGULATIONS DURING THE WORK. THEENGINEER WILL NOT ADVISE ON NOR ISSUEDIRECTION AS TO SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ANDPROGRAMS.3.THE DRAWINGS HEREIN REPRESENT THEFINISHED STRUCTURE. DURING ERECTION OFTHE STRUCTURE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLBE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARYSHORING, BRACING, FORMING, ETC. TO HOLDTHE STRUCTURE IN PROPER ALIGNMENT ANDTO WITHSTAND ALL LOADS TO WHICH THESTRUCTURE MAY BE SUBJECTED. SUCHMEASURES SHALL BE LEFT IN PLACE AS LONGAS REQUIRED FOR SAFETY AND UNTIL ALLFRAMING AND CONNECTIONS ARE IN PLACE.4.FOOTINGS AND SOIL DATA:4.1.SOIL PARAMETERS ARE ASSUMED FORTHE DESIGN OF THE RETAINING WALLSFOR THE FOLLOWING:4.1.a.MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOILBEARING CAPACITY = 2000 PSF.4.1.b.LATERAL SOIL PRESSURES(EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE) 45PCF.4.2.FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON NATURALUNDISTURBED SOIL OR ON COMPACTED,ENGINEERED FILL. ALL SUBGRADESHALL BE PREPARED AND COMPACTEDACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDATIONSPROVIDED BY A GEOTECHNICALENGINEER.5.ALL TOPSOIL, FILL AND OTHER UNSUITABLEBEARING MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED. AGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL INSPECTTHE EXCAVATED AREA TO ENSURE ALLMATERIALS REQUIRING REMOVAL HAVE BEENREMOVED AND TO VERIFY THE SOIL BEARINGCAPACITY USED FOR DESIGN PRIOR TOCONCRETE PLACEMENT.6.EMBEDMENT DEPTH FROM EXTERIOR GRADETO BOTTOM OF FOOTING SHALL NOT BE LESSTHAN 5’-0”. BOTTOM OF FOOTING ELEVATIONSHALL BE LOWERED AS REQUIRED TO MEETTHIS MINIMUM.7.ALL RETAINING WALLS SHALL HAVE AMINIMUM OF 12 INCHES OF FREE-DRAININGGRANULAR BACKFILL, FULL HEIGHT OF WALL,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROVIDECONTROL JOINTS IN RETAINING WALLS ATAPPROXIMATELY EQUAL INTERVALS NOT TOEXCEED 40 FEET OR 3 TIMES THE WALLHEIGHT. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS ATEVERY FOURTH CONTROL JOINT UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.8.MUD SLABS, FOOTINGS OR SLABS SHALL NOTBE PLACED ONTO OR AGAINST SUBGRADECONTAINING FREE WATER, FROST OR ICE.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARYPRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT ANY FROST ORICE FROM PENETRATING ANY FOOTING ORSLAB SUBGRADE BEFORE AND AFTERPLACING CONCRETE UNTIL SUCH SUBGRADESARE FULLY PROTECTED BY THE PERMANENTBUILDING STRUCTURE OR PROPER DEPTH OFBURY.9.DO NOT UNDERMINE EXISTING FOUNDATIONS.10.REINFORCED CONCRETE:10.1.DESIGN CODE: USE BUILDING CODEREQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURALCONCRETE (ACI 318), LATEST ADOPTION10.2.CONCRETE MIXES SHALL BE DESIGNEDPER ACI 301 USING THE FOLLOWINGPARAMETERS:10.2.a.PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMINGTO ASTM C150 OR C595.10.2.b.AGGREGATE CONFORMING TO ASTMC33.10.2.c.ADMIXTURES CONFORMING TOASTM C494, C1017, AND C260. DONOT USE CALCIUM CHLORIDE ORADMIXTURES CONTAINING CALCIUMCHLORIDE.10.2.d.CONCRETE SHALL BE READY-MIXEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C94.11.REINFORCING STEEL11.1.BARS -ASTM A615, GR. 6011.2.PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE ANDREINFORCEMENT SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH ACI AND CRSISTANDARDS.11.3.DO NOT FIELD BEND BARS PARTIALLYEMBEDDED IN HARDENED CONCRETEUNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ORACCEPTED BY THE ENGINEER.11.4.PROVIDE CORNER BARS EQUAL IN SIZEAND SPACING TO WALL HORIZONTALREINFORCEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISEDETAILED.12.COLD WEATHER CONCRETING SHALL FOLLOWPROCEDURES IN ACI 306.13.HOT WEATHER CONCRETING SHALL FOLLOWPROCEDURES IN ACI 305.14.PROVIDE 32 BAR DIAMETER LAP LENGTHSFOR WALL FOOTINGS UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE. FOR OTHER LAP LENGTHSPROVIDE CLASS B LAP SPLICES INACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318.15.BAR SUPPORTS AND HOLDING BARS SHALL BEPROVIDED FOR ALL REINFORCING STEEL TOENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUMCONCRETE COVER. BAR SUPPORTS SHALL BEPLASTIC, PLASTIC TIPPED, EPOXY COATED ORSTAINLESS STEEL FOR UNCOATED STEEL.BAR SUPPORTS FOR COATED STEEL SHALL BEPLASTIC, PLASTIC COATED OR EPOXYCOATED.16.CONCRETE MIX DESIGN(S) SHALL BESUBMITTED TO ENGINEER/ARCHITECT FORREVIEW.17.PROVIDE REINFORCING STEEL SHOPDRAWINGS TO ENGINEER / LANDSCAPEARCHITECT FOR REVIEW / APPROVAL.18.MATERIAL STRENGTHS:LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTESDESCRIPTIONCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH (fc)AT 28 DAYSMAXAGGREGATE SIZESLUMPMAX WATERTO CEMENTRATIOS(W/C)3/FOOTINGS3,000 PSI1 1/2"4" ± 1"0.57RETAININGWALLS (5%AIRENTRAINED)4,000 PSI3/4"4" ± 1"0.451 / TOLERANCE ON AIR CONTENT AS DELIVEREDSHALL BE ± 1.5%2/ PRIOR TO THE ADDITION OF PLASTICIZER ORHIGH-RANGE WATER-REDUCER1 / TOLERANCE ON AIR CONTENT AS DELIVEREDSHALL BE ± 1.5%L001GENERAL NOTESN/Acreation date:12/12/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L001.dwglast saved:HOME_FOLDER December 12, 2023 1:36 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275200 201 TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW32TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.1474144810121111313215124IRVAGGIRVIRVIRVIRVIRVWSP953.4IRVIRVIRVIRV930940932934936938942944946950948952954956958960962964930940932934936938942950944946948952940942944946948934936932938950952954956960958PROPERTY LINEFOX STREETMAXWELL BAYLAKE MINNETONKAOHW 929.4'931.50 - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LINECHANNELSTUBBS BAYLAKE MINNETONKAOHW 929.4'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SE T B A C K L I N E 931.50 - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LINE 150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE -9R-3R-4R-3R-7R-2R-7R43-11R-11R-1R-1R-11R-1R-9R-7R-11R-11R-9R-7R-7R-4R-4R-10R-11R-8R-11R-6R-11R-11R5TYP.2TYP.5TYP.-11R1TYP.-5R-6R-4R-9R-4R-6R-8R-1TR-4TR-5TR-6TR-7TR-8TR-9TR-10TR-11TR-2TR-3TR-99TR-100TR-101TR-103TR-104TR-102TR-105TR-96TR-95TR-97TR-98TR-90TR-91TR-85TR-88TR-92TR-93TR-94TR-87TR-86TR-1R-1R-1R-1R-107TR-1R-89TR-82TR-84TR-80TR-78TR-81TR-83TR-1R-1R-1R-70TR-71TR-72TR-73TR-75TR-74TR-76TR-77TR-79TR-1R-1R-1R-66TR-67TR-68TR-1R-65TR-1R-57TR-58TR-59TR-56TR-51TR-52TR-53TR-54TR-55TR-1R-1R-1R-1R-1R-49TR-48TR-47TR-46TR-45TR-1R-1R-1R-1R-1R-50TR-38TR-41TR-42TR-44TR-43TR-1R-1R-64TR-39TR-40TR-60TR-61TR-62TR-63TR-1R-1R-1R-1R-31TR-32TR-33TR-34TR-35TR-36TR-37TR-28TR-30TR-29TR-27TR-1R-26TR-1R-25TR-1R-24TR-6R-4R-15TR-16TR-1R-1R-22TR-23TR-21TR-1R-1R-14TR-1R-13TR-1R-12TR-1R-19TR-18TR-1R-20TR-4R-4R-4R-17TR-1R-106TR-1R-1R-1R-1REX. GUESTHOUSE FFE- 937.40-6R11-9R-9REXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN1L010EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDREMOVALS PLAN1" = 30'SCALE:001" = 30'15'60'30'REMOVALS SCHEDULEKEYDESCRIPTIONR1EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVEDR2EXISTING ENTRY GATE TO BE REMOVEDR3EXISTING DRIVE TO BE REMOVEDR4EXISTING WALLS TO BE REMOVEDR5EXISTING AUTOCOURT TO BE REMOVEDR6EXISTING PAVING TO BE REMOVEDR7EXISTING SITE ELEMENT TO BE REMOVEDR8EXISTING STEPS TO BE REMOVEDR9EXISTING UTILITY TO BE REMOVED V.I.FR10EXISTING HOUSE TO BE DEMOLISHEDR11EXISTING IRRIGATION TO BE REMOVED-Rcreation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L010.dwglast saved:HOME-FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:18 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275KEY PLANNOT TO SCALEGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPERMITSHEET NOTES1.SILT FENCE/TREE PROTECTION FENCE2.DOUBLE ROW SILT FENCING3.GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE4.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREANEXISTING TREE INVENTORY*TO BE REMOVEDKEYSPECIESDBH (IN.)HEALTHINSIDE 75' SETBACKREPLACEMENT RATIOTR1SPRUCE7.0FAIRTR2SPRUCE7.0FAIRTR3SPRUCE7.0FAIRTR4SPRUCE7.0FAIRTR5SPRUCE7.0FAIRTR6SPRUCE7.0FAIRTR7SPRUCE7.0FAIRTR8SPRUCE7.0FAIRTR9SPRUCE7.0FAIRNNATR10SPRUCE7.0FAIRNNATR11SPRUCE7.0FAIRNNATR12POPLAR10.5DEADY1:1TR13POPLAR10.5DEADY1:1TR14POPLAR10.5DEADY1:1TR15POPLAR10.5DEADY1:1TR16POPLAR10.5DEADY1:1TR17SPRUCE9.0DISEASEDY1:1TR18BOX ELDER24.0FAIRTR19RED OAK31.0POOR / TWO LINED CHESTNUT BORERTR20BASSWOOD32.0FAIRTR21SPRUCE8.0POORY1:1TR22ASH14.0EMERALD ASH BORERY1:1TR23ASH19.0EMERALD ASH BORERY1:1TR24WILLOW48.0STRUCTURAL DEFECTS MAJORTR25SPRUCE9.0RHIZOSPHAERA NEEDLE CASTY1:1TR26RED MAPLE21.0POOR / HALF DEADY1:1TR27RED MAPLE29.0POOR / LARGE DEFECT IN TRUNKY1:1TR28SUGAR MAPLE34.0POOR / LARGE DEFECT IN TRUNKTR29BASSWOOD20.0FAIRTR30WILLOW40.0FAIRTR31BASSWOOD28.0FAIRTR32LINDEN20.0FAIRTR33RED PINE12.0FAIR / DIPLODIATR34RED PINE12.0FAIR / DIPLODIATR35RED PINE12.0FAIR / DIPLODIATR36RED PINE12.0FAIR / DIPLODIATR37RED PINE12.0FAIR / DIPLODIATR38BUR OAK46.0FAIRTR39WILLOW41.0FAIRTR40WILLOW34.0FAIR / TIP DIEBACKYPER INCHTR41WHITE PINE8.0FAIRTR42WHITE PINE18.0FAIRTR43BLUE SPRUCE17.0RHIZOSPHAERA NEEDLE CASTY1:1TR44BLUE SPRUCE10.0RHIZOSPHAERA NEEDLE CASTY1:1TR45RED CEDAR7.0FAIRYPER INCHTR46RED CEDAR7.0FAIRYPER INCHTR47RED CEDAR5.0FAIRYLESS THAN 6"TR48RED CEDAR5.0FAIRYLESS THAN 6"TR49RED CEDAR7.0FAIRYPER INCHTR50BASSWOOD30.0FAIRTR51HACKBERRY17.0FAIRTR52RED CEDAR7.0FAIRNNATR53RED CEDAR7.0FAIRNNATR54RED CEDAR5.0FAIRNNATR55RED CEDAR5.0FAIRNNATR56SPRUCE6.0RHIZOSPHAERA NEEDLE CASTY1:1TR57BASSWOOD17.0FAIRTR58BASSWOOD17.0FAIRTR59BASSWOOD17.0FAIRTR60WILLOW44.0STRUCTURALLY DEFECTIVEY1:1TR61WILLOW23.0FAIRYPER INCHTR62WILLOW29.0FAIRTR63WILLOW22.0FAIRTR64ASH13.0EMERALD ASH BORERY1:1TR65BLUE SPRUCE8.0POOR / SPIDER MITESY1:1TR66BLUE SPRUCE9.0FAIRYPER INCHTR67BASSWOOD20.0FAIRTR68BASSWOOD26.0FAIRTR69HACKBERRY18.0FAIRTR70WILLOW31.0DEADY1:1TR71WILLOW30.0FAIRTR72WILLOW21.0FAIRTR73BLACK WILLOW12.0FAIRTR74RIVER BIRCH10.0FAIRTR75RIVER BIRCH8.0FAIRTR76WILLOW9.0DEADY1:1TR77WILLOW6.0DEADY1:1TR78ELM24.0FAIRTR79RIVER BIRCH6.0FAIRTR80WILLOW15.0STRUCTURALLY DEFECTIVEY1:1TR81RIVER BIRCH7.0FAIRTR82WILLOW47.0STRUCTURALLY DEFECTIVEY1:1TR83WILLOW54.0FAIRTR84WILLOW52.0STRUCTURALLY DEFECTIVEY1:1TR85WILLOW46.0FAIRTR86WHITE PINE12.0FAIRTR87WHITE PINE12.0FAIRTR88WHITE PINE12.0FAIRTR89WHITE PINE12.0FAIRTR90BOX ELDER6.0FAIRNNATR91ELM6.0FAIRNNATR92RED CEDAR16.0FAIRYPER INCHTR93RED CEDAR16.0FAIRYPER INCHTR94WHITE PINE13.0FAIRTR95BLUE SPRUCE14.0POOR / SPIDER MITES / RHIZONNATR96BLUE SPRUCE17.0POOR / SPIDER MITES / RHIZONNATR97SCOTCH PINE24.0FAIRTR98SCOTCH PINE20.0FAIRTR99SCOTCH PINE19.0FAIRTR100AUSTRIAN PINE25.0FAIRTR101AUSTRIAN PINE21.0FAIRTR102SCOTCH PINE24.0FAIRTR103PONDEROSA PINE22.0FAIRTR104SCOTCH PINE26.0FAIRTR105BLUE SPRUCE13.0POOR / SPIDER MITESNNATR106UNKNOWN - REMOVED BYBRATT TREENASEVERE LEAN OVER STRUCTUREY1:1TR107COTTONWOOD24.0POOR / HAZARDOUSY1:1TOTAL1:1 REPLACEMENT TREES24TOTAL INCHES TO BE REPLACED134"202 TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW930940932934936938942944946950948952954956958960962964930940932934936938942950944946948952940942944946948934936932938950952954956960958GARAGE32TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.DET.GARAGEHOUSETYP.1EX.GUESTHOUSE64714481012111131321512416141718PROPERTY LINEFOX STREETMAXWELL BAYLAKE MINNETONKAOHW 929.4'931.50 - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LINECHANNELSTUBBS BAYLAKE MINNETONKAOHW 929.4'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SE T B A C K L I N E 931.50 - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LINE 150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE475' SETBACK LINE 155SEE ENLARGEMENT PLAN12TYP.2TYP.2TYP.-1P1-3P-6P3TYP.TYP.-1L4'TYP.-8S415'-2ETYP.-7L-2LTYP.L100SITE REFERENCE PLAN1" = 30'SCALE:001" = 30'15'60'30'creation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L100.dwglast saved:HOME_FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:18 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275GENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPLAN14.BUILDING OVERHANG - SEE ARCH.15.PERGOLA - SEE ARCH.16.DECK - SEE ARCH.17.ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITE18.PROPOSED NEW SEPTIC TANK LOCATIONS VIFKEY PLANNOT TO SCALELIGHTING SCHEDULESYMBOLKEYDESCRIPTION-LLACCENT LIGHT, TYP.1SCUSTOM DRIVE ENTRY GATE8SITE REFERENCE PLAN1NP1BITUMINOUS SURFACINGPAVING SCHEDULEHATCHKEYDESCRIPTION-PSITE ELEMENT SCHEDULESYMBOLKEYDESCRIPTION-SSHEET NOTES1.DOCK2.MOWN TRAILS3.FURNITURE BY OWNERS4.LAWN EDGEP3STONE VENEER PAVINGP6STONE VENEER STEPS, TYP.EDGING SCHEDULEKEYDESCRIPTIONE2PLANTING EDGING-EL2SURFACE-MOUNT STEP LIGHTL6BOLLARD LIGHT203 ENTRYCOURTGUESTCOURTTERRACEP.A.ACACGEN.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.T956958960962950952940942944946948934936938950952954956958GARAGE10' x 8' SPAP.A.54' x 20' POOLTYP.TYP.DET. GARAGEHOUSEP.A.P.A.P.A.ENTRYTYP.11161418PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE4AUTOCOURTLAWN / SODPERGOLAFFE: 951.50BFFE: 940.50FFE: 948.00BFFE: 938.00FFE: 950.50ENTRYDRIVEWATER ELEV:949.50WTR ELV.950.501555LAWN / SOD30'37'-2"4'-5"3'-5"15'41'-4"SITE LAYOUT PLAN1L101SITE LAYOUT PLAN1" = 10'SCALE:05'10'20'01" = 10'creation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L101.dwglast saved:HOME_FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:03 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275GENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPLAN14.BUILDING OVERHANG - SEE ARCH.15.PERGOLA - SEE ARCH.16.DECK - SEE ARCH.17.ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITE18.PROPOSED NEW SEPTIC TANK LOCATIONS VIFKEY PLANNOT TO SCALEN204 ENTRYCOURTGUESTCOURTTERRACEP.A.ACACGEN.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.T956958960962950952940942944946948934936938950952954956958GARAGE10' x 8' SPAP.A.54' x 20' POOLTYP.TYP.DET. GARAGEHOUSEP.A.P.A.P.A.ENTRYRISRDN2RISRDN4RISRDN20RISRDN6RISRDN6RISRDN6RISRDN3RISRDN2RISRDN2RISRDN2RISRDN6RISRDN6RISRDN6RISRDN3RISRDN4RISRDN2RISRDN4TYP.11161418PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE4AUTOCOURTLAWN / SODPERGOLAFFE: 951.50BFFE: 940.50FFE: 948.00BFFE: 938.00FFE: 950.50ENTRYDRIVEWATER ELEV:949.50WTR ELV.950.501555LAWN / SODRISRDN2RISRDN2RISRDN5RISRDN3RISRDN2RISRDN2-6P-2P-2P-7P-3P-3P-3P-7P-7P-1P-3P-3P-2P-4P-5P-3P-2W-3W-1W-8W-6W-4W-7W-5P-6P-6P-8P-8P-6P-6P-6P-3P-3P-3P-6P-1E-2E-2E-6P-6P-1E-1E-2E-2E-1ETYP.-2E-3P-6P-3P-5W-4P-2P-2P-2E-2E-2E-2E-8P-6P-6P-2E-5P-5P-5P-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-2W-1W-1E-1E-1E-1E-3P-3P-1E-1ETYP.-6W-1E-1ESURFACING AND WALLS PLAN1L102SURFACING AND WALLS PLAN1" = 10'SCALE:05'10'20'01" = 10'creation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L102.dwglast saved:HOME_FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:31 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275GENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPLAN14.BUILDING OVERHANG - SEE ARCH.15.PERGOLA - SEE ARCH.16.DECK - SEE ARCH.17.ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITE18.PROPOSED NEW SEPTIC TANK LOCATIONS VIFKEY PLANNOT TO SCALENP1BITUMINOUS SURFACINGPAVING SCHEDULEHATCHKEYDESCRIPTION-PWALL SCHEDULEKEYDESCRIPTIONW1STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLW2STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLW3STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLW4STONE VENEER FREESTANDINGW5STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLW6STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLW7STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLW8STONE VENEER RETAINING WALL-WP2C.I.P. CONCRETE SURFACINGP3STONE VENEER PAVINGP4AGGREGATE SURFACINGP5STONE VENEER COPINGP6STONE VENEER STEPS, TYP.EDGING SCHEDULEKEYDESCRIPTIONE1PAVEMENT EDGINGE2PLANTING EDGING-EP7DRY-LAID STONE PAVINGP8CIP CONCRETE STAIR205 ENTRYCOURTGUESTCOURTTERRACEP.A.ACACGEN.CBP.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.T956958960962950952940942944946948934936938950952954956958GARAGE10' x 8' SPAP.A.54' x 20' POOLTYP.TYP.DET. GARAGEHOUSEP.A.P.A.P.A.ENTRYTYP.11161418PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE4AUTOCOURTLAWN / SODPERGOLAFFE: 951.50BFFE: 940.50FFE: 948.00BFFE: 938.00FFE: 950.50ENTRYDRIVEP.E.P.E.ADADADADCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBADAD ADCBCBCBCBCBCBCBC BADADAD CBP.E.C BADADCBC BWATER ELEV:949.50WTR ELV.950.501555LAWN / SODTYP.-9S-10S-2L-7S-3L-2L-2L-1L-3L-1L-1S-1L-1L-2L-5S-1L-2L-2L-2L-1S-1S-1S-2S-3S-2S-2S-1L-1L-1S-6S-2S-2L-4L-5L-2STYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.-4STYP.TYP.-3STYP.-2S-1STYP.-2LTYP.-4L-1L-1L-2LTYP.-2S-2S-1S-1STYP.-1LTYP.-1LTYP.-1LTYP.-1S-1S-1S-1S-1LTYP.-1S-1S-5LTYP.-2S-1LTYP.-1LTYP.-1L-1S-1S-1S-1S-2LTYP.-2LTYP.-1S-1STYP.TYP.-2S-1STYP.TYP.-1S-1LTYP.-1L-1LTYP.TYP.-2S-2S-1S-1S-1S-2S-2S-2S-1S-1S-1S-1S-6LTYP.-6L-7LTYP.-1S-2LTYP.-3L-7L-2LTYP.TYP.SITE ELEMENTS AND LIGHTING PLAN1L103SITE ELEMENTS AND LIGHTINGPLAN1" = 10'SCALE:05'10'20'01" = 10'creation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L103.dwglast saved:HOME_FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:30 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275GENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPLAN14.BUILDING OVERHANG - SEE ARCH.15.PERGOLA - SEE ARCH.16.DECK - SEE ARCH.17.ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITE18.PROPOSED NEW SEPTIC TANK LOCATIONS VIFKEY PLANNOT TO SCALENSITE ELEMENT SCHEDULESYMBOLKEYDESCRIPTION-SCBCATCH BASINS1ADAREA DRAINS2P.E.POP-UP EMITTERS3LIGHTING SCHEDULESYMBOLKEYDESCRIPTION-LLACCENT LIGHT1SCUSTOM SPA5SCUSTOM WATER FEATURE6SRAISED GARDEN BEDS7SCUSTOM DRIVE ENTRY GATE8SCUSTOM FIRE FEATURE9SCUSTOM FIRE SEATING 10SCUSTOM POOL4L3UNDERWATER LIGHTL4LED STRIP LIGHTL2SURFACE-MOUNT STEP LIGHTL5RECESSED WALL LIGHTL6BOLLARD LIGHTL7WELL LIGHT206 TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW930940932934936938942944946950948952954956958960962964930940932934936938942950944946948952940942944946948934936932938950952954956960958GARAGE32TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.DET.GARAGEHOUSETYP.947946950 940939938942945943941944948 949 950950939940941942943944945946947948949939 937 936 935 934 933 932 938 93895 0950950941 940 949 948 947 946 945 944 943 942 958960959961957954956955951 9629529539509509519529539549589599609579569559559549539529511EX.GUESTHOUSE64714481012111131321512416141718PROPERTY LINEFOX STREETMAXWELL BAYLAKE MINNETONKAOHW 929.4'931.50 - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LINECHANNELSTUBBS BAYLAKE MINNETONKAOHW 929.4'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SE T B A C K L I N E 931.50 - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LINE 150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE475' SETBACK LINE 949948947946945944943155SEE ENLARGEMENT PLANL200GRADING AND DRAINAGEREFERENCE PLAN1" = 30'SCALE:001" = 30'15'60'30'creation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L200.dwglast saved:HOME-FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:19 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275GENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPLAN14.BUILDING OVERHANG - SEE ARCH.15.PERGOLA - SEE ARCH.16.DECK - SEE ARCH.17.ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITE18.PROPOSED NEW SEPTIC TANK LOCATIONS VIFKEY PLANNOT TO SCALEGRADING AND DRAINAGE REFERENCE PLAN1N207 ENTRYCOURTGUESTCOURTTERRACEP.A.ACACGEN.CBP.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.P.A.951.33TOWTG956958960962950952940942944946948934936938950952954956958GASGARAGE10' x 8' SPAP.A.54' x 20' POOL951.33TOW951.33TOW3. 0 % 1. 4 %1.5%4 . 0%5.6%1.6%1.5%1.6%1%1.0%1.3%1.8%2.2% 1:71.7%1:125.6%1:51:31.2%1.3%TYP.TYP.939.75BOSDET. GARAGEHOUSEP.A.P.A.P.A.951.25TOS951.33ENTRY951.33950.50950.50948.00948.00951.33947.50BOW950.50BOS951.33951.25TOS949.25BOS950.83TOS949.83BOS950.83TOS949.83BOS950.75BOS949.83TOS954.50BOW950.25BOS949.67950.00950.00940.17940.17940.33940.33951.00950.85H.C.950.25H.C.950.25BOS955.00H.C.950.25951.00940.33950.25BOS951.25TOS952.50TOS954.58TOS952.58BOS940.00BOW940.17942.20WELL949.00945.80TOS949.00TOS937.83BOW949.00BOW949.50BOW949.00BOW950.50BOW950.50BOW946.00BOS942.60TOS942.80BOS939.60BOS949.50TOS950.50BOW946.00BOW949.33947.50950.33949.25BOW948.00BOS949.25935.83936.00BOS938.00TOS940.00BOW943.00TOW951.33951.33951.25TOS951.25TOS954.50TOW954.50BOW947.50BOW950.17950.25BOS950.25BOS951.50TOW951.50TOW951.33951.25TOS950.25BOS950.25BOS950.25950.00950.00951.33951.00951.00950.25951.25TOS951.25TOS950.25951.33950.25940.00951.33950.83TOS949.83BOS949.42950.25943.00BOW951.00949.00BOS940.50TOWRISRDN2RISRDN4RISRDN20RISRDN6RISRDN6RISRDN6RISRDN3RISRDN2RISRDN2RISRDN2RISRDN6RISRDN6RISRDN6RISRDN3RISRDN4RISRDN2RISRDN4TYP.947946950 940939938942945943941944948 949 950950939940941942943944945946947948949939937936938938 95 0950950941949948947946945944943942 958959957954956955951952953950950951952953954958959960957956955955954953952951950.50BOW954.50BOW949.50BOW954.50TOW955.00954.50H.P.954.50TOW953.50BOW954.50TOW1.0%40.0%11161418PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE4AUTOCOURTLAWN / SODPERGOLA949FFE: 951.50BFFE: 940.50FFE: 948.00BFFE: 938.00FFE: 950.50ENTRYDRIVEP.E.P.E.ADADADADCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBADAD ADCBCBCBCBCBCBCBC BADADAD CBC BADADCBC BWATER ELEV:949.50WTR ELV.950.501555LAWN / SODRISRDN2RISRDN2RISRDN5RISRDN3RISRDN2RISRDN21GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN1L201GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN1" = 10'SCALE:05'10'20'01" = 10'creation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L201.dwglast saved:HOME-FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:19 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275GENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPLAN14.BUILDING OVERHANG - SEE ARCH.15.PERGOLA - SEE ARCH.16.DECK - SEE ARCH.17.ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITE18.PROPOSED NEW SEPTIC TANK LOCATIONS VIFKEY PLANNOT TO SCALEN208 TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW930940932934936938942944946950948952954956958960962964930940932934936938942950944946948952940942944946948934936932938950952954956960958GARAGE32TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.DET.GARAGEHOUSETYP.1EX.GUESTHOUSE64714481012111131321512416141718PROPERTY LINEFOX STREETMAXWELL BAYLAKE MINNETONKAOHW 929.4'931.50 - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LINECHANNELSTUBBS BAYLAKE MINNETONKAOHW 929.4'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SE T B A C K L I N E 931.50 - 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LINE 150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE475' SETBACK LINE 155SEE ENLARGEMENT PLAN1AS10PS6AS37PS3LL3PT-2RT-3RT-12RT-6RT2BN4LL-9RT-5RT-4RT-34RT-35RT-8RT-11RT-14RT-22RT-24RT-23RT-28RT-36RT3AF-18RT1QM3PT-10RT-44RT-39RT-15RT-40RT1AF-29RT-13RT-7RT-41RT-43RT-42RT1QM2PT2AF1SA1AF3BN1BN1AF1QM2AF-19RT-20RT2AF1QM-17RT-25RT-21RT-26RT-32RT-33RT2QM-31RT-30RT2QM-38RT-37RT-27RT-1RT2QM-16RT1AF-58RT3LL-45RT-46RT-47RT-56RT3AF-55RT-57RT6LL-48RT-49RT-50RT-59RT-51RT-52RT4QM-53RT-54RT-60RT-61RT8PS1TYP.1TYP.1TYP.G2G2G1G1G2G2L400LANDSCAPE REFERENCE PLAN1" = 30'SCALE:001" = 30'15'60'30'creation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L400.dwglast saved:HOME-FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:22 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275GENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPLAN14.BUILDING OVERHANG - SEE ARCH.15.PERGOLA - SEE ARCH.16.DECK - SEE ARCH.17.ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITE18.PROPOSED NEW SEPTIC TANK LOCATIONS VIFKEY PLANNOT TO SCALELANDSCAPE REFERENCE PLAN1NTURF & SEED MIXESHATCHKEYNAMEAREASEED RATEG1TURF/SOD6200 S.Y.G2NO-MOW FESCUE 0.7 ACPLANTSCHEDULEREPLACEMENT TREESKEYNAMEQTYSIZESPACINGBNBetula nigraRIVER BIRCH62" CAL.B&BSEEPLANAFAcer x freemanii 'Jeffersred'AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE53" CAL.B&BSEEPLANAFAcer x freemanii 'Jeffersred'AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE114" CAL.B&BSEEPLANLLLarix laricinaEASTERN LARCH168-12' HT.B&BSEEPLANAAPopulus tremuloidesQUAKING ASPEN82" CAL.B&BSEEPLANQMQuercus MacrocarpaBUR OAK103" CAL.B&BSEEPLANQMQuercus MacrocarpaBUR OAK44" CAL.B&BSEEPLANSASalix alba 'Tristis'NIOBE WEEPING WILLOW12" CAL.B&BSEEPLANTAGQTYSHEET NOTES1.MOWN TRAILSPLANTSCHEDULETREES BEYOND TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTKEYNAMEQTYSIZESPACINGPSPinus strobusWHITE PINE53 EA.10-20'HTSPADEDSEEPLANASAcer saccharum ‘Green Mountain’GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGARMAPLE7 EA.5" CAL.SPADEDSEEPLANTAGQTYPROPOSED TREE REMOVAL &REPLACEMENT SCHEDULEKEYSPECIESDBH (IN.)TYPEINSIDE 75' SETBACKCONDITIONREPLACEMENT RATIOREPLACEMENT TREE IDREPLACEMENT TREESTR9SPRUCE7.0EVERGREENNFAIRNATR10SPRUCE7.0EVERGREENNFAIRNATR11SPRUCE7.0EVERGREENNFAIRNATR12POPLAR10.5DECIDUOUSYDEAD1:1RT12" CAL. PTTR13POPLAR10.5DECIDUOUSYDEAD1:1RT22" CAL. PTTR14POPLAR10.5DECIDUOUSYDEAD1:1RT32" CAL. PTTR15POPLAR10.5DECIDUOUSYDEAD1:1RT42" CAL. PTTR16POPLAR10.5DECIDUOUSYDEAD1:1RT52" CAL. PTTR17SPRUCE9.0EVERGREENYDISEASED1:1RT68-12 HT' LLTR21SPRUCE8.0EVERGREENYPOOR CONDITION1:1RT88-12 HT' LLTR22ASH14.0DECIDUOUSYDISEASED1:1RT92" CAL BTTR23ASH19.0DECIDUOUSYDISEASED1:1RT102" CAL BTTR25SPRUCE9.0EVERGREENYDISEASED1:1RT118-12 HT' LLTR26RED MAPLE21.0DECIDUOUSYPOOR, HALF DEAD1:1RT122" CAL BTTR27RED MAPLE29.0DECIDUOUSYLARGE DEFECT INTRUNK1:1RT132" CAL. PTTR43BLUE SPRUCE17.0EVERGREENYDISEASED1:1RT148-12 HT' LLTR44BLUE SPRUCE10.0EVERGREENYDISEASED1:1RT158-12 HT' LLTR45RED CEDAR7.0EVERGREENON LINEFAIRPER INCHRT16,171 - 3" CAL. AF, 1 - 4" CAL.AFTR46RED CEDAR7.0EVERGREENON LINEFAIRPER INCHRT18,191 - 3" CAL. AF, 1 - 4" CAL.AFTR47RED CEDAR5.0EVERGREENON LINEFAIRLESS THAN 6"TR48RED CEDAR5.0EVERGREENON LINEFAIRLESS THAN 6"TR49RED CEDAR7.0EVERGREENON LINEFAIRPER INCHRT20,211 - 3" CAL. AF, 1 - 4" CAL.AFTR52RED CEDAR7.0EVERGREENNFAIRNATR53RED CEDAR7.0EVERGREENNFAIRNATR54RED CEDAR5.0EVERGREENNFAIRNATR55RED CEDAR5.0EVERGREENNFAIRNATR56SPRUCE6.0EVERGREENYDISEASED1:1RT228-12 HT' LLTR64ASH13.0DECIDUOUSYDISEASED1:1RT232" CAL. PTTR65BLUE SPRUCE8.0EVERGREENYDISEASED1:1RT248-12 HT' LLTR66BLUE SPRUCE9.0EVERGREENYFAIRPER INCHRT25,26,273- 3" CAL. QMTR70WILLOW31.0DECIDUOUSYDEAD1:1RT282" CAL. PTTR76WILLOW9.0DECIDUOUSYFAIRPER INCHRT29,30,313 - 3" CAL. QMTR77WILLOW6.0DECIDUOUSYFAIRPER INCHRT32,332 - 3 " CAL AFTR80WILLOW15.0DECIDUOUSYSTRUCTURALLYDEFECTIVE1:1RT342" CAL BTTR82WILLOW47.0DECIDUOUSYSTRUCTURALLYDEFECTIVE1:1RT352" CAL BTTR84WILLOW52.0DECIDUOUSYSTRUCTURALLYDEFECTIVE1:1RT362" CAL BTTR90BOX ELDER6.0DECIDUOUSNFAIRNATR91ELM6.0DECIDUOUSNFAIRNATR92RED CEDAR16.0EVERGREENYFAIRPER INCHRT37,38,39,404 - 4" CAL. QMTR93RED CEDAR16.0EVERGREENYFAIRPER INCHRT41,42,43,444 - 4" CAL. AFTR95BLUE SPRUCE14.0EVERGREENNDISEASEDNATR96BLUE SPRUCE17.0EVERGREENNDISEASEDNATR105BLUE SPRUCE13.0EVERGREENNDISEASEDNATR106UNKNOWN -REMOVED BY BRATTTREENADECIDUOUSYHAZARDOUS - SEVERELEAN OVERSTRUCTURE1:1RT72" CAL SATR40WILLOW34.0DECIDUOUSYFAIR / TIP DIEBACKPER INCHRT45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,538 - 8-12' HT LL, 1 - 3" CAL.QMTR60WILLOW44.0DECIDUOUSYSTRUCTURALLYDEFECTIVE1:1RT543" CAL. OAKTR61WILLOW23.0DECIDUOUSYFAIRPER INCHRT55,56,57,58,59,604 - 4" CAL. AF, 1 - 8-12' HTLL, 1 - 3" CAL. QMTR107COTTONWOOD24.0DECIDUOUSYPOOR / HAZARDOUS1:1RT613" CAL. OAKTOTAL1:1 REPLACEMENT TREES - REQUIRED24TOTAL INCHES TO BE REPLACED - REQUIRED134"TOTAL 1:1 REPLACEMENT TREES - PROPOSED24TOTAL INCHES REPLACED - PROPOSED135NOTE: 1 8-12' HT EVERGREEN = 1 4" CAL. TREE209 ENTRYCOURTGUESTCOURTTERRACETG956958960962950952940942944946948934936938950952954956958GASGARAGE10' x 8' SPA54' x 20' POOLTYP.TYP.DET. GARAGEHOUSEENTRYTYP.11161418PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT LINE30' SETBACK LINE5' EASEMENT L INE EASEMENT LINE75' SETBACK LINE150' VIEW EASEMENT LINE4AUTOCOURTLAWN / SODPERGOLAFFE: 951.50BFFE: 940.50FFE: 948.00BFFE: 938.00FFE: 950.50ENTRYDRIVEWATER ELEV:949.50WTR ELV.950.501555LAWN / SODG21AG4GT1AG3AG3AG6AR6GTG1G1G2G2G2G2G256AA236BB40AA76AA76AA133AA821AA526AA964AA502BB173BB1260BB77BB148BB771BB1157BBLANDSCAPE PLAN1L401LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 10'SCALE:05'10'20'01" = 10'creation date:12/13/2023filepath:/Users/HOME_FOLDER/TVLS Dropbox/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/FOX POINT RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/VARIANCE-SET/L401.dwglast saved:HOME-FOLDER December 13, 2023 5:22 PM The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings,graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the expresswritten permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available forlimited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governementagencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice.© Copyright 2023 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved.NOTE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONlicense no:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.43728TRAVIS VAN LIEREDrawn By:Date:Scale:Drawing:3400 FOX STREET ORONO, MN 553563400 FOX STREETSheet:12/13/2023date:12/13/2023AC, AN, BWRev #DescriptionDateISSUED FOR VARIANCE12/13/2023ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING3255 GARFIELD AVE. S. #100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408T 612 345 4275GENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L000 FOR PROJECT INFORMATION, SHEETINDEX, AND LEGEND.2.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.4.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.5.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.6.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.8.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.9.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT.KEYNOTES1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE- SAVE AND PROTECT3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT,REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS4.EX. UTILITIES - SAVE AND PROTECT5.EX. FENCE - SAVE AND PROTECT6.EX. GUEST HOUSE - SAVE AND PROTECT7.EX. GUEST HOUSE DECK - SAVE AND PROTECT8.EX. EDGE OF WETLAND - SAVE AND PROTECT9.EXISTING AC UNIT - SAVE AND PROTECT10.EXISTING RIP-RAP SHORELINE ALONG CHANNEL - SAVEAND PROTECT11.EXISTING SHORELINE ELEVATION CONTOUR12.ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (OHW)13.RIP-RAP TO BE RESTORED - SEE SHORELINE RESTORATIONPLAN14.BUILDING OVERHANG - SEE ARCH.15.PERGOLA - SEE ARCH.16.DECK - SEE ARCH.17.ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITE18.PROPOSED NEW SEPTIC TANK LOCATIONS VIFKEY PLANNOT TO SCALENPERENNIALS & FORBS & GRASS & GROUNDCOVERSKEYNAMEQTYSIZESPACINGAAPerennial MixTBD2700EA.#1CONT18"O.C.BBGroundcover MixTBD3325EA.#4CONT12"O.C.PLANTSCHEDULESEE SHEET L701 FOR FULL PLANT SCHEDULE, ANDSHEET L001 FOR PLANTING SPECIFICATIONSTREES BEYOND TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTKEYNAMEQTYSIZESPACINGPSPinus strobusWHITE PINE53 EA.10-20'HTSPADEDSEEPLANASAcer saccharum ‘Green Mountain’GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGARMAPLE1 EA.5" CAL.SPADEDSEEPLANGTGleditsia tricanthos ‘Inermis’SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST8 EA.4" CAL.B&BSEEPLANARAcer rubrum ‘Autumn Radiance’AUTUMN RADIANCE MAPLE6 EA.4" CAL.B&BSEEPLANAGAmelanchier grandifolia ‘AutumnBrilliance’ (multi-stem)AUTUMN BRILLIANCESERVICEBERRY8 EA.10' HT.B+BSEEPLANTAGQTYTURF & SEED MIXESHATCHKEYNAMEAREASEED RATEG1TURF/SOD6200 S.Y.G2NO-MOW FESCUE 0.7 ACSHEET NOTES1.MAINTENANCE PATH210 Date: Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address:3400 Fox Street, Orono, Minnesota 55391 Prepared By:Sathre-Bergquist 12/11/2023 In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe)Length x Width Total (Square Feet) SB Job Number:36915-001 Prepared by: ML Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle One) Step 1: PROPOSED HARDCOVER B Stoops 331 C Concrete Driveway 9,712 (Example)(Garage)(24' x 30')(720 S.F.) A Proposed House 7,293 F Ex. Retaining Walls 155 G Paver Sidewalk 1,481 D Patio 3,540 E Concrete Steps 422 J Concrete Slab 390 K Detached Garage 910 H Proposed Ret Wall 600 I Pavers 947 N Proposed Pool 1,541 O Concrete Paver 125 L SPA 118 M Ex. Boat House 807 R S P Q V W T U Z (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 28,372.00 X Y Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): F &H Retaining Wall 755 (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 755 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contrained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)]27,617.00 (4) Total Lot Area 320,316 Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)]8.62% 211 212 213 STUBBS BAY 01 I TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BUILDERS LAND COMPANY IN GOVERNMENT SOT I, SECT/ON 5-117-23 LOTS 8 AND 9, AUDITORS SIVBD/VISION NO 207) 7 1 r \ \ 9j& 946 970 9aa \ 968 95 952 41/ 9sG - f/ Ti THIS ITEM HAS BEEN MICROFILM&BED i ;v ( • , o»d pa kq , r \ as wal Vo 944 SCALE /" = I00' DATE 10-24-69 DA TUM .' MEAN SEA LEVEL 1,11okr /eve/ On Ocr"°6er ?4, /9G9 = .928-30 I East line ,t Govt !of /, 39 936 .---` `.., 934- 9 3Z3493z 930 MAXWELL BAY GORDON R. ! COFFIN LAND SURVEYOR AND PLANNER LONG LAK, MINNESOTA 4 I I I I 3vo 6 -V%!- 214 t O Nz° CiO MLMJL N O COt x E- 1- j NLO a o Cf) CX 7 C, p y N v_ i NI NI V) LO a M M W z LW 0C N N 3: 9000 m x m ED 0 tO Nz° I I I E- N o Cf) I C, p y W u w U U z V co N a cn wJ) LUooQa x zow Q rz U Q T. U cn u ad 1" n''. j w 1v j c® , u} z ow W y z 0 U G(/ y Qoz Q y6 F CD I_- E I W x O m v a Uo r. a am3 Qa cz nav oz 000( s¢ v w a Q CQ tO Nz° i a wUOLUCva- c( OJ uUcn I \ 1 \ I I I E- I C, p y W u w U U f r 3 w J) LUooQa o Q rz U Q T. 3mw U¢ z m I o z¢ 0LOpp Oz wwDwCVX03 o! O Z¢ Q E r Qoz m 3 cn M Q F CD I_- E O d z I x O m v a Uo r. a am 3 Qa cz nav oz 000( s¢ v w a Q CQ Z dCSU= M- pOUOZZF k-- CN LU oc a r caD w iv wao¢ c O_ jw OZ w of f Z¢ LU la- p w C F, HN O w p fn V) z ma S 0 c of 0 mcnwZXa( 00 O( O a a O r w O( zmpw o zp 3 U Q) C2, O¢ at ^ aEnEw D cwn s ¢ Qa( ca CS CL t - Z w w¢ Zawz a wpQwwziNr nz zcn D— N--- w mw d w z Qw UcndU k - L Q) CSaZm¢ mp Qw U N Z C z a; c W cc v i t- Q p U zoz O( w oaoa( w o z ofw pw( a wO¢ a( 3pmUU Jlz CVU 01 L CV a aUU zNLu N o ocnz ZOOSOz F Lu ' L LU oo( zp U z U 33Um cnc5 30 cn wQ a, s' m J vo zap p pZ Jz w¢ w wOw( Q Op w¢ m w1w IL wa( wF ¢ 1- U r¢¢ z oW ¢ LU Q) a( r a F [` p w 3 Uw Fy- ncp S w LI -( A U) Lu of y Lu cv owwyet Z rC 6 UQOLO ZO tn t_¢¢ wU¢ U F- zw¢ LU Cf) Oa` N Zzaw zzp noO[ F Ucop- ocnz ¢ V- a,> i, C wmal t= Om m, U LUo( ULL z¢¢ LU F- z O UUw uawEzz zaz o w z p tn OCSw D w p OO Oa = wcn U_ Qu ov z F tOU O( UU zt cri wO> O Op> f < t - w5 Q oao[ cs O( Ovu( ymOw¢ ww cnz O U oU zZDQoOU oU wp ut= v¢ Uw¢ w ac UzUw CSS a( o[ J U m F- z ` L > w> r O 0- in O N UpoOZaaca< CIZ OOdtL ido a O¢ w wdFY OEdow[ cna( pr JamU a<< owtowcZ iXuaQ 3 Gu i a wUOLUCva- c( OJ uUcn I \ 1 \ I I I I f I I 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 1 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Bob and Courtney Kill Applicant Representative: Travis Van Liere, TBL Studio Project Name: 3400 Fox Street LGU Project No. (if any): W23-040 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 8/28/2023 Date of LGU Decision: 9/18/2023 Date this Notice was Sent: 9/18/2023 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ☒ Wetland Boundary/Type ☐ Sequencing ☐ Replacement Plan ☐ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ☐ No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits: ☐ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) ☒ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ☐ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☒ Approved1 ☐ Denied List Conditions: Decision-Maker for this Application: ☒ Staff ☐ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other: Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify): 1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1. ☒ Attachment(s) (specify): Site plan ☒ Summary: Rob and Courtney Kill has applied for wetland type confirmation for the wetlands located on/at 3400 Fox Street, Orono. A wetland delineation was conducted by Ben Hodapp (Anderson Engineering) on August 15, 2023. The delineation shows one wetlands within the project area. Wetland 1 was identified as a Type 1, Seasonally Flooded Basin (PEM1A) of 1.48 acres. 223 BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 2 MCWD, BWSR, Anderson Engineering, and TVLS reviewed the boundaries in the field on September 12, 2023. MCWD and BWSR were in agreement to update the wetland boundaries to exclude existing shoreline riprap. This updated figure is attached. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as shown in the delineation report. This decision is valid for five years. A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. 1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Project Documents ☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ☐ Yes1 ☐ No 1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ☒ SWCD TEP Member: Stacey Lijewski- stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chesnut- jed.chesnut@state.mn.us ☐ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): ☒ DNR Representative: Wes Saunders-Pearce- wes.saunders-pearce@state.mn.us ☐ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: ☒ Applicant: rob.kill3@gmail.com ☒ Agent/Consultant: travis@tvlstudio.com, bhodapp@ae-mn.com Optional or As Applicable: ☐ Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ☐ Members of the Public (notice only): ☐ Other: 224 BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 3 Signature: Date: 9/18/2023 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. 225 Wetland 1Type 1PEM1ASeasona lly Flooded Basin1.48 Ac.A B IA-A Legend Project ParcelHennepin Co. Parcels Wetland Field DelineatedAugust 16th, 2023Rev. September 11, 2023OHW (929.6' NAVD 88)Sample Point SOURCE : MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co ., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of OronoHennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Fox Street PropertyOrono, Minnesota Figure 5Delineation I1 inch = 150 feet0150 30075 Feet Address: 34000 Fox StreetOrono, MinnesotaLat/Long: 44.966172,-93.610802PID: 0511723430005Project No: 17605Date: 9.12.2023 226 1 TJ Majdecki From:TJ Majdecki Sent:Wednesday, December 13, 2023 9:07 AM To:' Cc:Rob Kill; Courtney Kill Subject:3400 Fox Street - Variance Application Attachments:2023.12.13 3400 Fox Street Neighbor Letter.pdf; 2023.12.13 3400 Fox Street Project Summary.pdf; 2023.12.12 Fox Point Renderings.pdf Greengs, We are reaching out to share the aached documentaon that will accompany the variance request from the straight line setback requirement {per Sec. 78-1279 of the Orono Zoning Regulaons} for our clients property located at 3400 Fox Street. As a part of the variance applicaon process, the City of Orono requires that we contact the adjacent property owners to inform them of the variance request and provide the project narrave and supporng design documents. We are requesng that the new build be located within the same setbacks and parameters of the exisng home on the site. The unique condion of the lot as a corner / peninsula in respect to the two adjacent homes creates a straight line setback that deems the current build site unusable. The setbacks we are requesng would meet and exceed the typical setbacks for shoreline and side yard requirements, and also maintain the 150 foot view easement that exists on the southern poron of the property. The design team is also introducing a massing for the new home that is reduced from the current flat roof structure currently on the site, as illustrated in the aached renderings. Should you have any quesons on the design direcon of the project please reach out to myself and Rob and Courtney. We have also included the contact informaon for the other partners in the project team in the aached leer. Best, T.J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TJ MAJDECKI Partner / Lead Designer MURPHY & CO DESIGN 235 LAKE STREET E, STE 301 WAYZATA MN 55391 612 470-5511 / 203 554-8026 CELL @MURPHYCODESIGN / MURPHYCODESIGN.COM {3345 Fox Street property owner} 227 1 TJ Majdecki From:TJ Majdecki Sent:Wednesday, December 13, 2023 9:11 AM To: Cc:Rob Kill; Courtney Kill Subject:3400 Fox Street - Variance Application Attachments:2023.12.13 3400 Fox Street Neighbor Letter.pdf; 2023.12.13 3400 Fox Street Project Summary.pdf; 2023.12.12 3400 Fox Street Renderings.pdf Greengs, We are reaching out to share the aached documentaon that will accompany the variance request from the straight line setback requirement {per Sec. 78-1279 of the Orono Zoning Regulaons} for our clients property located at 3400 Fox Street. As a part of the variance applicaon process, the City of Orono requires that we contact the adjacent property owners to inform them of the variance request and provide the project narrave and supporng design documents. We are requesng that the new build be located within the same setbacks and parameters of the exisng home on the site. The unique condion of the lot as a corner / peninsula in respect to the two adjacent homes creates a straight line setback that deems the current build site unusable. The setbacks we are requesng would meet and exceed the typical setbacks for shoreline and side yard requirements, and also maintain the 150 foot view easement that exists on the southern poron of the property. The design team is also introducing a massing for the new home that is reduced from the current flat roof structure currently on the site, as illustrated in the aached renderings. Should you have any quesons on the design direcon of the project please reach out to myself and Rob and Courtney. We have also included the contact informaon for the other partners in the project team in the aached leer. Best, T.J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TJ MAJDECKI Partner / Lead Designer MURPHY & CO DESIGN 235 LAKE STREET E, STE 301 WAYZATA MN 55391 612 470-5511 / 203 554-8026 CELL @MURPHYCODESIGN / MURPHYCODESIGN.COM {3350 Fox Street property owner} 228 Page 1 of 3 Date: December 13, 2023 Pr oject: 3400 Fox Street Re: Variance Application Enclosures: Project Narrative Letter; 3D rendering package; Landscape / Site plan Fox Point Residence Variance Submittal To the adjacent neighbors of 3400 Fox Street, Our team is preparing a variance application for a new principal home and detached accessory garage, on behalf of our clients, Courtney and Rob Kill. The design team has worked closely with our clients over the past few months to develop a new design that is strongly connected to the site and available views from this unique property. The new home would sit in the approximate location of the existing structure, with similar view orientations. We are also keeping the footprint of the home and attached outdoor pergola set back from the existing 150 foot deep view corridor / easement that exists on the property. The massing of the structure, being a single story main floor with a walkout lower level, is a reduction from that of the current flat roof structure that exists on the property, as illustrated in the attached 3d rendering packet. Orono requires a straight line setback on lake shore lots. As defined in the code, the average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lake shore lots. The included image below illustrates this straight line setback and delineates the line the new home would need to be placed behind. Given the unique characteristics of this corner / peninsula lot, the straight line setback requirement creates an unbuildable lot condition. Our team is requesting a variance to this straight line setback requirement, and instead asking for a setback as defined below for the principal and detached accessory structures: · 30’-0” interior side setback to the east · 30’-0” interior side setback to the north · Northerly line of the 150’-0” view easement corridor to the south · 75’-0” OHWL setback to the west These setbacks are the general setback requirements for the LR-1A zoning district and would place the new principal structure in the general vicinity of the existing and non-conforming structure. 229 230 Page 3 of 3 Project Team / Contacts A rchitectural Design Team Murphy & Co. Design 235 Lake Street E, Suite 301 Wayzata MN 55391 O: (612) 470-5511 Contact: T.J. Majdecki; tj@murphycodesign.com Landscape Design Team Travis Van Liere Studio 3255 Garfield Avenue, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55408 O: (612) 345-4275 Contact: Travis Van Liere; travis@tvlstudio.com Builder Anderson | Reda 4920 Lincoln Drive Edina, MN 55436 O: (612) 564-3648 Contact: Kareem Reda; kareem@andersonreda.com 231 38 05-117-23 41 0029 KAREN K WAKE BECKER ET AL 575 OXFORD ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0001 JERRY E & CYNTHIA J GRAY 880 PARTENWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0002 JANE E PICCARD BYRON A PARKER 865 PARTENWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0003 ANN M THEISEN 815 PARTENWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0005 FOX STREET TRUST 3400 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0003 WILLIAM L TRUBECK 3300 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0006 SF REAL ESTATE LLC 3345 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0007 SF REAL ESTATE LLC C/O MARCEL SMITS 3345 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0008 3350 FOX STREET LLC 3350 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0009 HUANG/WANG LIVING TRUST 3320 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 44 0010 SF REAL ESTATE LLC C/O MARCEL SMITS 3345 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 232 He nn epin Co u n ty L oc ate & N o tify Map 340 0 F o x St 0 200 400100 Feet Da te : 12 /18/2 023 Buffer Size:500Map Co mm e nts : Th is d ata (i) is furn ish ed 'AS IS' with no represen ta tion as tocompleteness or accuracy; (ii) is fu rn ish ed with n o warra nty of anykind; an d (iii) is n ot suitable for le ga l, eng ineerin g or surve yingpurposes. Hennepin County shall not b e liab le for a ny da ma ge , in ju ryor loss resu lting from this dat a. Fo r mo re inf ormation , co nta ct Hen ne pin Co un ty GI S Off ice300 6th S tree t So uth , Minn ea polis, MN 5 5487 / gis.in fo@h en ne pin.us 233 Item No.: 5.1 Date: January 16, 2024 Presenter: Laura Oakden Presenter: Director of Community Development Section:New Business Title: LA23-000067, Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, Concept Plan 1.Purpose: The applicant is requesting a Concept Plan Review for a proposed 156 multifamily condo development at 3245 Wayzata Blvd. 2.Background: The applicant is proposing to develop the 30.5 acre property (two parcels) into a master planned condominium-type development. This area is guided for some of the highest density in the city. As proposed the development does not meet the density requirements for the Comprehensive Plan. The project will require additional units within the development, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and a zone change. The property has been the subject of several development proposals over the past 7 years, including a twin home development, an apartment complex, and townhome development. All previous approvals have expired. The site contains an old landfill, somewhat hampering development. 3.Staff Recommendation: Staff would recommend that applicant revise there plan to meet the density requirements for overall City. Planning Commission Action Requested The Planning Commission is requested to give non-binding feedback. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A Staff Report Exhibit B Application Exhibit C Narrative.pdf Exhibit D Proposed Concept Plan Exhibit E Concept Plan_Setbacks 234 To: Chris Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Date: January 16, 2024 Subject: #LA23-000067, Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, Concept Plan Background The applicant is proposing to develop the 30.5 acre property (two parcels) into a master planned condominium-type development. This area is guided for some of the highest density in the city. As proposed the development does not meet the density requirements for the Comprehensive Plan. The project will require additional units within the development, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and a zone change. The property has been the subject of several development proposals over the past 7 years, including a twin home development, an apartment complex, and townhome development. All previous approvals have expired. The site contains an old landfill, somewhat hampering development. Proposal The proposed development master plan shows seven separate buildings ranging from 18- 24 units per building in a multifamily condo-style development with 156 total units. The developer is proposing a two phased approach. The first phase will include five buildings with a total of 108 units and the second phase will include two buildings with 48 additional units. Each building is proposed to have underground parking and the overall the development will provide some surface parking spaces. The buildings are arranged around open space and a proposed community amenity which will a pool, clubhouse, and play area. The developer is working with the MPCA to address the landfill cleanup. The developer notes that it is a high priority for them to address the environmental cleanup on the site. They are proposing to remove the contaminated materials from the water table and wetland. The contaminated material will be kept and properly capped on the south side of the property. Access to the property will be provided by a single drive off of Wayzata Boulevard. This access will need to be approved by Hennepin County. The project will be served by municipal water and sanitary sewer. Issues Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The main issue to be considered is the City’s willingness to adjust the Comprehensive Plan-designated density guidance for the property. The northern 5 acres are currently guided for low density residential at 3-8 units per acre, and the southern 10 Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a Concept Plan Review for a proposed 156 unit multifamily development at 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff requests non-binding feedback on the proposed Eisinger Flats project. 235 FILE #23-000067 January 16, 2024 Page 2 of 5 acres are guided for high density residential at 20-25 units per acre. A minimum of 215 dwelling units were contemplated for the area as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Amendment; with 215 units, the City’s calculated overall density is 3.206 units per acre. Application materials provided by the applicant in 2018 refined the actual developable area of the property. 7.95 acres of the property was guided for low density and 7.76 acres of the property was guided for high density due to the wetland area identified with the delineation. The wetland areas are removed from the developable area calculation. The current guidance with the reduced buildable area would require roughly 179 units under the current guidance with the wetland areas removed. As part of the submittal the developer also identified wetland, right-of-way, and buffer areas. According to the developer, there are 11.24 acres of buildable area, 4.47 acres less than the 2018 calculation. This adjustment which reduces the buildable land would require 169 units to be a qualifying project, It would reduce the overall calculated density to 3.00 units per acre for the City. To allow this density change, a Comprehensive Plan amendment would be required to rezone the land to Urban Medium High Density of 15-20 units per acre. This is important because the city’s density, affordable housing, and housing unit goals will still be met, even with slightly lower densities. At 156 total condo units, the applicant is proposing fewer overall units than required. Based on the currently known information , including the buildable area of the land and the wetlands, the property would need to maintain a 15 unit per acre density to meet the City’s requirement. (15 units x 11.24 acres = 169 total units) Proposed: 156 units/ 11.24 acres= 13.8 units/acre Results in 2.95 units/acre overall City Density As proposed, this development does not meet the density standards required for the city. This results in a decrease in our overall City Density Calculation of 3.1 to 2.9. As proposed, the development does not follow the City’s Comprehensive Plan goals for the density requirements of the Met Council. Following MPCA and Met Council guidelines, the contaminated area on the south side of the property may be able to be removed from the buildable land calculation. If the developer wants to explore the removal of this space from the buildable area and therefore the density equation, additional guidance from the MPCA would be required. The removal of the contaminated land area would decrease the overall buildable acres. However, this would then require the developer to provide a more dense development so the City can maintain its 3.0 unit per acre density requirement. Zoning. The project is anticipated to be rezoned and developed as a Residential Planned Unit Development (“RPUD”). Rezoning the property to a RPUD district will allow for the proposed densities and will provide the Council with the flexibility to deviate from the standards outlined. The portions of the property within 250 feet of the 974’ OHWL Lake Classen cannot be rezoned to RPUD; the portion of the property more than 250 feet from the OHWL may be rezoned to RPUD at the discretion of the city council when all other requirements are met. The analysis below outlines the standards and flexibilities requested. 236 FILE #23-000067 January 16, 2024 Page 3 of 5 Applicable Regulations: • Chapter 78, Division 11, RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development District • Chapter 78, Section 78-627 (a) Concept Plan Review • Chapter 82, Article III, Plat approval Process 78-626 Subsections: Concept Plan Review: Code Section 78-626 Required Standards Provided by the Development: Conforming? 1 Minimum area: 5 acres / 250’ setback from OHWL • The property to be platted is 30.5 acres - Conforming • Portions of the property are within the 250’ OHWL setback – Variance/Flexibility maybe required. 2 Uses. Multifamily residential uses are permitted - Conforming 3 Sewer availability Conforming 4 Density. Each development in the RPUD district shall have a density within the range specified in the comprehensive plan for the specific site. DOES NOT MEET The shifting of the densities will require comprehensive plan amendment, however the overall City Density would result in 2.9 units/acre where 3 is required. 5 Incentives. The city may utilize incentives to encourage the construction of projects which are consistent with the city's housing goals. None requested. 6 Floor Ratio, up to 1.0 To be verified, appears to be well less than 0.5. 7a Setbacks: 50’ from Wayzata Blvd/CSAH 212, 50’ from Highway 12, 35’ from the sides. Drive lanes 20’ from exterior property lines. The plans reflect a setback of 35’ feet for a principal structure (off of Wayzata Blvd) Flexibility is requested. 7b Height, stories, roof style No formal calculations have been done, but the conceptual buildings appear to be 2 or 2.5 stories and meet the 30’ height maximum. They are expected to comply. 7c Outside storage None proposed. Conforming 11 10% Private Recreational Area (Active and/or Passive) No final calculations have been completed, but the Community amenity area would quality as private recreation space. 12 Common Ownership Conforming. Association documents required. 13 Signage Signage located, details not yet developed. 14 Landscaping Landscaping plans have not been developed 15 Architectural Standards Elevations provided, conceptually appear conforming. 16 Flexibility from standards Requested: External Setbacks. 17 Traffic Studies The applicant is working with Hennepin County for a Traffic Analysis. 237 FILE #23-000067 January 16, 2024 Page 4 of 5 18 Building Permits Expected. 19 General regulations applicability Expected. 20 Lighting Lighting plans not yet developed. 21 Trails Sidewalks proposed. Analysis: The current zoning, RR-1B, is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan; the zoning must be changed per state statute. Typically, in lieu of creating a brand-new zoning district, the city rezones these types of developments to RPUD, a district established for this purpose. Noted above, a variance may be necessary to meet 250’ setback requirements. Previous approvals for this site were granted setback flexibility; (Eisinger Flats 16-3822). This setback and external setbacks are the only identified flexibilities requested. Overall, the development does not meet the density requirements. More units are required to meet the City’s overall density standards. City Engineer: The development is within the MUSA and the property will be served by City Water and Sewer. Water: The water will need to be extended down Wayzata Boulevard to access the site. Sewer: The Metropolitan Council has a high-pressure sewer line that runs in front of the parcel. The applicant should coordinate with the Met Council to determine feasibility of connecting directly into the Met Council Line. If connecting to the Met Council line is not an option, the development can be connected to City infrastructure. Further analysis will be needed to determine the best way to extend the sewer service to the site down Wayzata Boulevard. Fire Chief: The Fire Chief noted that two standard cul-de-sacs should be installed to support fire services for this size of development. The hydrants will need to follow normal spacing and the each of the buildings will require fire suppression systems. Additionally, a more detailed analysis will be required for the street sizing and on-street parking as it pertains to emergency services. MCWD and DNR: The applicant noted they are working with the MCWD to reaffirm the wetland boundary approvals and any wetland buffers that will be required. Additionally, a large area of the property has a 1% annual chance of flooding (aka area below the 100-year flood elevation). The 100-year floodplain is classified as Zone A which does not identify a specific elevation. The developer will need to determine the 100-year floodplain elevation and verify all improvements will not impact the area. The MCWD and/or DNR may be able to provide assistance to the developer in this determination. Any impacts to the area at or below the 100-year floodplain elevation may trigger additional approvals and/or mitigation. MPCA: The developer has initiated a review process with the MPCA regarding the landfill cleanup including the proposed grading work and capping of the contaminated materials on site. Hennepin County: Regarding the impacts to Wayzata Boulevard, Hennepin County has provided 238 FILE #23-000067 January 16, 2024 Page 5 of 5 comments on past applications which included concerns with access, turn lanes, traffic and sightlines. The developer should note that Hennepin County is coordinating a 2024 road and utility project along Wayzata Boulevard. Met Council: The applicant will need to coordinate with the Met Council regarding sewer availability. Additionally, Staff will coordinate with the Met Council to determine density, land use, and Comp Plan Amendments that may need approval. Building design The building style and design are an important component of the overall character of the neighborhood. While the final design of the buildings hasn’t yet been established, the Planning Commission should talk about their goals for the property. The applicant is proposing contemporary-looking buildings with stone base, gabled roof, and stucco walls. The buildings will be 2 ½ stories tall and are intended to meet the 30’ height limit. The units are designed to support one-level living. Each building will have a shared entrance to access each of the units. The Planning Commission may want to provide feedback on the architectural design. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find the proposal appropriate? 2. Should the landfill area be excluded from the project? Is this a density benefit or detriment? 3. Are there any concerns about the setback flexibilities requested? 4. Does the Planning Commission have any feedback on the site layout or proposed building design? 5. Are there any issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff would recommend that applicant revise their plan to meet the density requirements for overall City. The Planning Commission is requested to give non-binding feedback. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Proposed Layout - Buildings Exhibit C. Narrative 239 Letter View file:///C/Users/loakden/Downloads/Land%20Use%20Application%20Summary%20(32).htm[1/12/2024 2:44:26 PM] Land Use Application Summary Application Date:12/13/2023 Address:3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number:3211823140002 Land Use Number:LA23-000067 Application Submitted By:Property Owner Owner:Name: LAKEWEST LLC Address: LAKEWEST LLC Applicant:Name: Stephen Jensen Company: Address: , stephenjensen@lwestdev.com Contact Information:Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:Re-development of 3245 Wayzata Blvd W into multi-family townhome flats. Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 240 Lake West Development | 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 | (952) 930-3000 1 December 13, 2023 Re: Narrative for Condo Flats Concept Review Application for 3245 Wayzata Blvd W – will be known as “Eisinger Meadows” Brief Overview The Eisinger Meadows development will revitalize a 30.5-acre plot of land into a collection of seven townhome flat buildings designed for one-level living, with each building containing 18 to 24 units. This redevelopment project, located along Wayzata Boulevard and surrounded by picturesque wetlands, aims to fulfill the city's vision of providing more density to the site and offering diverse housing options for the aging population. The site, containing a buildable area of 10.14 acres, will be initially built at a density of 15.38 units per acre. The townhome flat buildings will be arranged at the north end of the property closest to Wayzata Boulevard, while the southern end of the site will contain a recreational area, hosting a variety of amenities including tennis courts, pickleball courts, a community garden, an indoor gym, and open space. The development is located within a mile from community amenities. These townhome flats, catered towards empty-nesters and seniors, will provide a higher-end product that accommodates the needs of the aging population’s demand for single-level living, and focuses on accessibility, privacy, connection with nature, and outdoor communal areas to establish a community that matches their lifestyles. Housing The Eisinger Meadows development aims to provide a product type that enhances the supply of life cycle housing to the City of Orono. This single-level townhome flat style will enhance the overall variety of housing choices in the city for people of different ages, abilities, and lifestyles . The development will also fulfill the density needs of the City of Orono, which at 15.38 units/acre falls within the density range of the site’s proposed land use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The site is identified as an Urban Area in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and is within the future 2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area for sewer service. The city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan also indicates that the site is designated with two future land use c lasses: The north portion of the site is Urban Low Density Residential (3 - 8 units/acre), while the south portion of the site is Urban High Density Residential (20 - 25 units/acre). We are proposing to build at a density that blends these two classifications, using the Urban Medium High Density classification of 15-20 units/acre with a proposed density at the lower end of that range at 15.38 units/acre. 241 Lake West Development | 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 | (952) 930-3000 2 The City of Orono’s Community Management Plan for 2020 -2040 identifies some key elements of its housing that need to be addressed. The city’s population is forecasted to increase by approximately 2,000 persons in the next 20 years, which translates into a housing demand of 800 new dwelling units (Table 1). Based on the City of Orono’s Land Use Plan, approximately two-thirds of these new units are expected to develop in the urban area. The plan also indicates that new housing alternatives are anticipated to occur within the existing urban area as well as in specified urban area expansions detailed in the Land Use Plan. Table 1 The Eisinger Meadows site is identified as an Emerging Suburban Edge in the City of Orono’s Community Management Plan for 2020-2040. As an Emerging Suburban Edge, the local government’s role is to: 1. Plan and stage development for forecasted growth through 2040 and beyond at overall average net densities of at least 3-5 dwelling units per acre in the community. Target higher-intensity developments in areas with better access to regional sewer and transportation infrastructure, connections to local commercial activity centers, transit facilities, and recreational amenities. 2. Identify and protect an adequate supply of land to support growth for future development beyond 2040, with regard to agricultural viability and natural and historic resources preservation. 242 Lake West Development | 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 | (952) 930-3000 3 3. Incorporate best management practices for stormwater management and natural resources conservation and restoration in planning processes. 4. Plan for local infrastructure needs including those needed to support future growth. There is also a growing need within the City of Orono to provide a broader range of housing choices for empty-nesters and seniors whose lifestyles better match the amenities of attached or multi-family housing. Orono’s aging population is retiring and on f ixed incomes, creating a need for alternative senior housing accommodations. According to the 2000 U.S. Census and Hennepin County Records, approximately 56% of the housing stock is more than 50 years old (Table 2), which raises some concerns about its continued functionality if maintenance is deferred. Table 2 Our intention with this development is to address the City’s concerns for providing a necessary supply of housing for an ageing population while also undertaking vital environmental clean -up and restoration of the site. 243 Lake West Development | 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 | (952) 930-3000 4 Design These townhome flats are thoughtfully designed in the architectural style of a contemporary European building, while being derived from the classic Tudor style with simplified stylistic elements including a stone base, gabled roof and stucco exterior walls . This synthesis of classical aesthetics and modern sensibilities creates a unique design that is very residential in character. Careful consideration was given to the height of these townhome flats, which at 3 0 feet is consistent with residential zoning requirements, designed to appear as a single-family home from the roadway. Gabled roofs with dormers and chimneys will allow the townhome flats to not appear tall or imposing, and will further promote the residential vernacular of their design. The unit layouts are designed in the style of one -level single-family homes, in order to cater to an older demographic. The building is designed to appear as a townhome -style condo building, with each unit having a shared private entrance. However, the bui lding does not have a common corridor as found in typical condo buildings, maintaining a sense of privacy for residents. Each building will feature a below grade parking garage to preserve green and open space. Shared guest parking stalls will be located throughout the development, including alongside the private drive, and in the cul-de-sac to the south by the recreation area. 244 Lake West Development | 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 | (952) 930-3000 5 Amenities Eisinger Meadows will feature a variety of resident amenities, starting with a pool, grill area/outdoor kitchen and fire pit. At the south end of the development, between the townhome flats and the landscaping berm, a large multi -purpose recreation area wi ll feature tennis courts, pickleball courts, a community garden, a fenced -in dog area, an indoor gymnasium, and an open flex space. A seating area will be carved into the berm facing this flex space, allowing it to function as a stage or performance area. Wetland Protection/Waste Clean -Up A high priority when developing this property will be to undertake a necessary environmental clean-up. The westerly portion of the site, approximately 12 acres, was operated as a sanitary landfill from approximately 1958 through 1972, with additional road construction demolition fill placed on the property up to about 1993. The dumped material, which was capped with soil and was leveled to an even grade , created a small peninsula that extends south from Wayzata Boulevard and into the wetland. Currently, there are a variety of materials along the slope of the landfill, which include concrete debris, asphalt/bituminous debris, metal, wood, and other miscellaneous trash. A series of soil excavations and tests were conducted in 2014, 2016, and 2023 to determine the extent of the debris buried on site. We have determined that the northern portion of the lot is relatively uncontaminated, but larger amounts of debris can be found further south along the peninsula which will need to be removed and relocated. Tests were also conducted to determine if any contaminants including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) or asbestos were present in the soil, but none were detected. Through a phased construction process, we will undertake an administrative lot line adjustment to isolate the first phase of the development, which we’ve identified as the five buildings laid out in a row at the north end of the property (108 units). The second phase of the project will consist of the rest of the development to the south of the first phase, which includes two 24-unit buildings and the open recreation space. As the environmental clean-up and restoration efforts proceed, we will grade the entire site and move the soil, waste and contaminated soil out of the water table and towards the south end of the property. We will condense the waste and debris into a landscaping berm which we will cap with unpolluted material to prevent seepage into the wetland area. A 200 -foot setback from this berm to any residential structure will be maintained. This buffer area, about 2.4 acres in size, 245 Lake West Development | 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 | (952) 930-3000 6 will contain a recreational area with amenities including tennis courts, pickleball courts, a community garden, a dog park, and a multi -use space for recreational activities. The landscaping berm will serve multiple purposes. In the first place, it will allow for the consolidation and stabilization of any solid construction waste found in the area, removing the need to haul this debris off-site. It will also act as a natural landscaping buffer separating the townhome flats from Highway 12. Furthermore, the landscaping berm will feature a labyrinth - style walkway spiraling up to a small viewing platform at the top with benches, creating a unique shared community space. Additionally, seating will be carved within the north slope of the berm and will be facing the multi-purpose open flex space which has the capacity to host small-scale concerts or community events. The wetland surrounding the proposed development site is currently classified as a Preserve. A recent site visit and MnRAM analysis resulted in a Manage 1 classification for the surrounding wetlands. This is currently under formal review Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. In addition, a formal review of the wetland boundary was conducted and showed little to no change in our previous delineation which was approved in 2016. Another site visit and review of the wetland boundary will be necessary in spring 2024 to confirm that this delineation was accurate. Non-Conforming Features • Comprehensive plan amendment: The site currently holds two classifications on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use map. The northernmost portion of the site is assigned Urban Low Density Residential (3-8 units/acre), while the southernmost portion of the site is assigned Urban High Density Residential (20-25 units/acre). Our proposed development will contain a density of 15.38 units/acre which falls between these two classifications and is more similar to the lower end of the Urban Medium High Density classification range (15-20 units/acre). 246 Lake West Development | 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 | (952) 930-3000 7 • Zoning map amendment: The site is currently zoned RR-1B - One Family Rural Residential (2 acres). We would like to rezone the site to RPUD - Residential Planned Unit Development to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s recently approved density for this site. • Front yard setback variance: We will be seeking a variance for reducing the front yard setback from 50’ to 35’ from the property line. As this is a residential planned unit development, we would like to request the city’s flexibility in the required front yard setback based on circumstances that are unique to this site. The development is separated from Wayzata Boulevard by a landscaping berm and dense foliage, which will provide a natural buffer for the development. Furthermore, this reduction in the front yard setback will allow us to not need to encroach upon the wetlands further south from the proposed buildings. Conclusion With this development, we aim to provide an attractive housing product to the City of Orono that offers environmental remediation to this site. We believe that, after years of study, this is the best possible approach to environmental remediation and development for this site. The multi- family townhome flats will provide a much-needed supply of housing to the City of Orono and will be marketed towards empty-nesters and seniors whose lifestyles match the amenity offerings and lifestyles offered by this product. 247 Lake West Development | 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 | (952) 930-3000 8 Sincerely, Curt Fretham Chief Manager, Lake West Development Office: (952) 930-3000 Cell: (612) 720-5690 Email: CurtF@LWestDev.com Cc: Laura Oakden Melanie Curtis 248 ( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE01 inch = 60 ft.6012060CONCEPT DATA#WAYZATA BLVDUS HIGHWAY 12WETLAND BOUNDARYAVERAGED WETLAND BUFFER (delineation by others)200’ LANDSCAPING BERM SETBACKPondRaingardenRaingardenPondPROPERTY LINE35’Tennis courtPickleballcourtsPresumed ZoningGross Site AreaProposed Residential Buildable AreaUsable Setback Buer Area Allowable uses for buer: Non-residen-tial uses, community amenities, play area, recreation areaProposed TownhomesDensityAdjusted Net Density (156 un/7.75 ac)Net Density (156 un/10.14 ac)Net Density (156 un/13.36 ac)Net Density (156 un/30.5 ac) Open Flex Space UsesSpecial events, weddings, family reunions, concerts24-unit BuildingFootprint: 12,500 sq.ft.3 stories18-unit BuildingFootprint: 9,600 sq.ft.3 storiesRPUD~ 30.5 ac337,682 sq.ft. = 7.75 ac104,315 sq.ft. = 2.39 ac 156 units20.12 units/acre15.38 units/acre11.68 units/acre5.11 units/acre Residential Buildable Area onlyResidential Buildable Area + Landscaping Berm Setback AreaResidential Buildable Area + Landscaping Berm Setback Area + Landscaping BermLANDSCAPING BERM40’ height3:1 slopeGross Site Area24’ private roadEntry medianCommunity gardenFenced-in dog parkOpen ex spaceSeating carved into berm10’ property line setbackPool, repit and grill area46.6 ft 34 ft46.6 ft34 ft~200’ right turn lane249 ( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE01 inch = 60 ft.6012060CONCEPT DATA#WAYZATA BLVDUS HIGHWAY 12WETLAND BOUNDARYWETLAND BUFFER (delineation by others)10’ WETLAND BUILDING SETBACK200’ LANDSCAPING BERM SETBACKFootprint: 9,600 sq.ft.18 units 3 storiesPondRaingardenRaingardenPond40’WAYZATA BLVD R.O.W.PROPERTY LINE50’61’Footprint: 12,500 sq.ft.24 units 3 storiesFootprint: 12,500 sq.ft.24 units 3 storiesFootprint: 12,500 sq.ft.24 units 3 storiesFootprint: 9,600 sq.ft.18 units 3 storiesFootprint: 9,600 sq.ft.18 units3 storiesTennis courtPickleballcourtsPresumed ZoningGross Site AreaProposed Residential Buildable AreaUsable Setback Buer Area Allowable uses for buer: Non-residen-tial uses, community amenities, play area, recreation areaProposed TownhomesDensityAdjusted Net Density (144 un/6.3 ac)Net Density (144 un/8.23 ac)Net Density (144 un/11.24 ac)Net Density (144 un/30.5 ac) Open Flex Space UsesSpecial events, weddings, family reunions, concerts.RPUD~ 30.5 ac274,816 sq.ft. = 6.3 ac83,965 sq.ft. = 1.93 ac 144 units22.86 units/acre17.50 units/acre12.81 units/acre4.72 units/acre Residential Buildable Area onlyResidential Buildable Area + Landscaping Berm Setback AreaResidential Buildable Area + Landscaping Berm Setback Area + Landscaping BermLANDSCAPING BERM40’ height3:1 slopeGross Site Area40’24’ private roadEntry medianCommunity gardenFenced-in dog parkOpen ex spaceSeating carved into bermFootprint: 9,600 sq.ft.18 units 3 stories250 PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE 4 /(L Z 1 CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION PARK COMMISSION OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request Please complete the following information for City Records Name (please print) Address Present for (from agenda) Name or Number l 22�-fq ���r� o Gr��n 5i IS M(hV