The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-04-1987 Planning Packet^ I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING i:r^ fHCIL representative - Ed Callahan ATTENDANCE ACTION ITEMS 1. #1112 2. #1142 smith Bay Marina t. Vacht 1955 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 3. #1122 Big Island Veterans Camp Big Island Record Lot 7 - Conceptual Review - Board of Governors - Conditional Use Permit - Phase III • 4. #1128 Rainey Anderson, 780 Old Crystal Bay Road - Preliminary SuMivision - Class II - Tabled continuation of Public Hearing - Request 5. #1133 11138 Ronald E. Demshar, 2621 Casco Point Road Variances •" Public Hearing 7. #1139 Jim & Bonnie Lear, 2525 Dunwoody Avenue Variance - Public Hearing 8. #1140 Tom Berthiaume, 3035 Casco Point Road ^ Variance ** Public Hearing 9. #1141 Karlton Gempler, 1955 Fagerness Point Road Variances - Public Hearing 10. #1109 Curtis Johnson, 2024 Shadyw^ R^d - Variance - Request for Additional Review additional items 11. Planning Commission approval of April 20, 1987 minutes .o .•!.« • .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. 27th, 1987 Council meeting. ADJOURfflffiNT rntb iWfiiliPto'I 1 r ^ iti hi I ii Pc PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE PILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)NAME OR NUMBER ADDRESS 1.:7I)tWs{¥~r^/// 1) / //V-3 2. f '/<C-D4,/h^OsMrE5> '//A . // V 'V 3 • ( I 1 i H G a ti' fxKvLfit'f*t rr*u Mil. H hr ^ 4. . COor-j'XyflCj-o iVC -------t..L.., fcrrj-- - » - 1 S------------------------------- ^0 ZT'./i c 4 /// z. //-/ r 6."^^ fiuiJr /’7-7v Cvtc-cV ' nfz. n4z. 7. tK fur ns !i UJ. 75^‘■jt ’ 8 • t (/^yc //^// /Z > ! Nz^ / w *1 ! ij /1 10. Tern EescBV Sc4oo/ tkcTS^z.rW iZSo A/tBo/L S/. 1 n w w --------------- —— 1 2 ^ ~n ^ A <r^ 7~y ^/S^^O /P^l 13. Af/yy^)-s/ yf^//^ 3 14.m 15.1 16. 17. IS. 19. 20. 1 P.C^ PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE SIqI ^1 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME {please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) sez-/ "W "Be/i•CM^ yS A/^ ^ 3 . M V au LT/. ^ M it-] (--re.AAA rn.iT'?rH^,Y:rv.t)ir ^//v/ 5. .S> \v€£S s, =S fU4I ^//y^ / ^ A7. /1 i it_L^ v*Vf ( - A/lt4rJ ris 1 Olij'^i Xxj Mpl^t /;^o JL. 1— 9 r*--^ r -S y?> 'c, .Tv -V * T / ' 2- A -P ^ i0 . 't. *va _a A - - t/^^Y/Z/i^i /xje f 'fi,p /fl M-// 3 9 //<3 y ______ 4.J^A k H5'/ ('<»*vvr^i4^ if»'<«#■diHi 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. 1ri^ . - - . . . _ ___ ._ ... _ ......... _._.x_____.\ ■ t. ' f # », • f' mda) Mark E. Bernhardson, city Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building a Zoning Administrator April 30, 1987 CoidufoiiaJ I7e “permTt -"lec'ond" Brief Review of Application - that the proposed boat sales/service cent"^'’® Commission unanimously agreed was "v thin threxrstmrt^-T ® intellUrwas asked to submit a more detail on- ^ ^^^«nsmission shop. The applicant Smith Bay Marina, Inc hac e ^ operation. Since that the marina property seeking variances fT a'^^ ^ application for and a commercial site plan revilt for Ihf structure MTTirmfetfngl'’^ -PP^^-tion ^fetli„\*d“a? ylSl Som°” ^"'®''d'"e^t that wouldCommission on 2/17/871 ^ district (denied bv Piar>«^«2 0%Tv^^^‘■|tl^f^^fl^- ® P-P°-d • completion of the Pilling Coim"orielienrblt\'“*°l7 *''’® «Polreview of both applications #1112 and I»lst of Exhibits Exhibit n Planning Commission Minutes of 4/16/87 ExMM^ n “ Applicant’s Addendum «/16/87 Exhibit F - Amended Site Plan Review of Cosnaerclal Site Plan - Revised Plan Bate 4/20/87 - Access/Parking i. lillteTto III IlcelrifV^pa^l''Av^m.e*"Tb Bite unction 'f the through traffic to 1950 <?h * site plan proposed would drive is realized. slaffs review must b/7il?f ict access of the transmission propertv Th.. 71-^ be limited to the independent use with the single acces^^^^^;^J^^^^i^^onal stalls will no^work has redesigned a parking plan for a turnaround function. Cook The original plan pro^vided 11 ^oata, review Exhibit P. Subdivision 10 (o) - Retail spaces - per Section 10 61 .tall, for propo.,1 ual%%%‘^eglf ' only, •tall par 150 a.f. of not floor area). .-f-ZlSO - 7.8 or 8 .tall, - 1 [OifsT^ [•Hi^ ^jfr#Mfr«i ^•tr« •)§r«i '•liT# »iPii •liT^ M5I8 ^•r«i aiTtia [RR5 4lfK r#»7 r#^KI«R ! IJ Zoning File #1112 April 30, 1987 Page 3 of 4 Signage and Lighting utilized Ind the ^sign Temol^^d^^ be on the lighting for the sight a<-i-s bas submitted information will be asked to bring tjf liahtina lighting will be shielded frL\esident/fi meeting. AllCode. residential lot lines as required by the Rec • j 11 h I lendatlon per Conceptual Direction of the Planning O • nthi lission - to Pe^rs.iTrhri\a%°?ng"irt^e“"r"o7^^^^^ ‘ boat/nautical sales and servi« center usi oi°^h operate a property located at I960 Shorei,n. tesldential zoned proposed change in n^-conformino u.e Resolution No. 961 the no.i-conforinin|” tharthl existina f®" "I*®® intense or on the following findings: ^ emission repair/gas station use based site™® proposed use creates less demands on the severely limited =omp™t®ib®r:®:rtJ; sSrrord?ng^"e|[drn'/i®\ rioh^b™^ legal lakeshore commercial u^ses of adjacent existing 5;. "3 S t::r' ■"""•. ■— in,..,....., of boats allowed in open yard areasr"®'^ excessive storage distance at the'^adj^Lnt®inte?sectlon® Preserve adequate Sighting The following conditions apply to this approval: i; V:*/. v.vus,;"""-" 2. Applicant to work with Citv t-r> ri*‘/><s4 ascreening adjacent to 1 i f i- to provide appropriate naturalarea. ei«eent to lift station and within rear yard green space 3. Applicant to provide landscape improvements as follows: t«d in ln§ » A Zoning File #1112 April 30, 1987 Page 4 of 4 right-of-way. ’ continue to street aL ”adja^\"nVtl%pites Avlnu"e''an'd"^^^^^^^^ alonrnorfhea'^r^o^^tioT^f p;rhfnrsiafxi“n°//rpfoet ® ^ 25 fee?'- no mas^ts ” to be^ instil lei 16 not in excess of b; shiir/ed Trol\\T'x:t UneT!l"L‘’^l"‘''?^ shallside of building. Post fire lane with signage on east c«dif “”Llre° tIe*7o\^oIll7®site®ImIrXI®rnTs‘: Fire CodV aL°LdergroInd“ ttnrL*"east of luiWing'used^ to"it"e oil. etc., wastes from transmission repair operation! b) Removal of pump Island. c) Installation of drainage improvements as approved by City. d) Installation of landscaping improvements as set forth above. mainteLnce of nft*°statiorindII" acent®Uwer'’l“^^^ easements for their^^por^^ Sre5 ?2r «!ierrt'’you?Ie7ti"ngf •’aue r MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16, 1987 #1110 MARTINSON CONTINUED until 10:00 P.M^"s";royyU approva “?y fot'^area'and'" lo^®tidth^ria'-rl° for yofanf difk tyn\%"°lour\" Vr^t V/""'and additionally restrict tJv, staff recommendation P.M. Motion, aJL 7, Nays 0 #1112__SMITHS BAY MARINA INC. ro SHOR"t^BTTSHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONTINUATION OP PUBLIC HEARING for this matter wei**»« _, the history of the present non-conforn.ing use. pyerty" -nVV^rfv^ate'cLbhous^^r Jh“ laiyr-^W^^fdproperty It does not Include Iny on-sit^boat rJLM^ They would like consideration of some new bott Lies! Mr. Stone indicated that they would llk^ nn trs i n »,u proposed 16 parking stalls for boat uL. ^ Bellows asked if there would be enouoh oarklnn t-n !u7to::y ‘" -Ployesyan ‘l Art Tourangeau, 2060 Spates Ave . v^rifi^A “■"« to atcom^ate slips. He stated that he felt the the use cleaning^up^the area®. addition to ^llows suggested that the appropriateness of the use be ! mlr?,!" u%'e“!iL" ‘If intens/ty of use, finding fha^ ahrf-'Vll ‘ Appropriate use on thisShoreline property than a transmission shop. 4 Br the o play roininond' v^erage permit idation > 10x00 tone, »rnan, i lor*a t the rnit a lained lb ject world »palr. »a. yt the ng to r and en oni tat a odate t the on to s« he that thii MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16, 1987 11112 SMITHS BAY MARINA INC. CONTINUED Regarding the issue of pedestrian crossing on County Rd. 15, the representatives did not feel there would be much pedestrian crossing. Chairman Kelley read into the record letters from Alan 1940 Shoreline Drive, addressing his concerns; Morse, 2080 Spates Ave, indicating his support of the proposed use. Mary Crear, 1980 Spates Avenue, stated that she was in favor of the proposed plans but had concerns regarding the location and number of boats stored, boat repair use, and the amount of blacktop hardcover. They would be ameniable to approximately 4 boats stored on the property. In addition, she would like to see a landscape plan. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. The Planning Commission unanimously agreed (except Cohen) that the proposal would not be an intensification of use, and in order to proceed with a recommendation they would need a more detr.iled commercial site plan. Cohen abstained from commenting and voting on this application because of past dealings with Gerald Toberroan. The Planning Commission recommended issues/items/concerns to be addressed in the commercial site plan. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to table Application #1112 pending revised site plan. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0, Abstention 1 (Cohen). 11117 WILLARD C. SHULL 1125 SPRING HILL ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC BEARING 9:31 - 9:38 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. "‘11.Mr. Shull was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the request for hardcover and lakeshore setback variances to construct •! track boat lift. The ramp will consist of a track, six feet wide and fifty feet long. Approximately 20 feet of track wi 11 be on the land portion of the lakeshore. The remaining structure will consist of a cart and winch to mmrn RLWliornos &Assoaates 'j.i 'iU77 i .HS] t V>.. J / C' m Urluin and lir^ional Research and Planning DATE; TO: April 13, 1987 Jean Mabusth City of Orono FROM: Bob Wuornos RE: Smith Bay Karina Site Plan changes: A, Marina Parcel~ ~ * - - ------------ \V'- Setback from Lakeshore (929.4) Existing Undefined Proposed 15* Building Setback from Lake (929.4)9'50' Setback from Lot Line 0-10*10' Total Area 31,117 sq.ft.31,117 sq. ft. Structures 2,076 sq.ft.1,258 sq. ft. Total Hardcover 23,528 sq.ft.20,962 sq. ft. X Hardcover 87X 67X Green Space 3,908 sq.ft.10,155 sq. ft Parking Spaces 43 42 Transmission Site Boat Parking 0 rr Parking 10-12 yC n Total Area 10,731 sq . ft.10,731 sq. ft Building Area 1,283 sq.ft.1,283 sq. ft. Suite 215. S15 HV)«f lOfith St., Minneapolis. MS 55420 6!2-SiiS 7097 i ‘5/r"*' ; ■ L:,; I \B. c. Jf -^1tsf.- “» L'j £ i j.'_ Z' ! 1 y tn.j Q Transmission Site (con'd)Existing Proposed Total Hardcover 7,024 sq. ft.7,799 sq % Hardcover 65.5%72.6% Setbacks: Front O'10' Side 0*10' Rear 5*5' & 10' ■■■ Parking Lot (Grand Avenue and County Road 15) Total Area 14,569 sq. ft.14,569 s Building Coverage 2,516 sq. ft.0 sq. ft Total Hard'jover 3,867 9,005 • % Hardcover 26.5%63% Setbacks: Front 14'10' Side O'10' Rear 5'10' 4 RLW/bjk cc: Gerald Toberman Woody Love r.- ^ 53 ; " t~ Or- r- _ ; r " 5 « 8 / / /< : / •r A / ■/ /M /r^. "Vy/' / A S/'/'/ / / X // ///' '\x ^ i’ // / >7' // / /:::^x (/) S H /^ /1 *'• X X /' ■' .-"3j VJi C/) • / / /■h X < /rv-^'^'z /'K > t • . LlFrjjjATlOci -------#----------- /• ------------ M--JO' — Spates Avenue it- -; ill »*•%st-ssum^ %*'<^■"'.'5 ’'a: lx . I To: From: Date: Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 1, 1987 Subject: #1142 Smith Bay Marina & Yacht Club, Inc., 1955 Shoreline Dr. ~ Variances & Commercial Site Plan Review - Public Hearing The new owner of the marina proposes a major upgrading of the entire B-2 property. The fact that all improvements are new, code standards of the B-2 zone must be addressed by recognizing the need for variances although the improvements result in a less intense use of this severely limited property. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Application Property Owners List Applicant's Overview Applicant's Specific Comments on Marina Project Fact Sheets from Applicant's Engineer LMCD Code Section 3.02, Subdivision 8 Cook's Sketch of Surface Drainage Control (Rip Rap/Filter Fabric/Grass Berm) Building Elevations Floor Plans Survey of Property - Prior to Restoration of Docks Comprehensive Plan for Development A.Section 10.41, Subdivision 10 (A) Lakeshore Setback a) Principal Structure Required Existing Proposed Variance 75' 9' 50' 25'or 33.3% existing 66' or 88% B. b) Deck Structure Connecting to Existing Dock Required ■ 75' Existing * O' Proposed ■ 15' Variance *60' or 80%, existing ■« 0* or 100% Section 10.41, Subdivision 10 (B) Side Setback to Residential Dsed Property a) Principal Structure Required ■■ 50' Existing * 14' Proposed ■ 40' Variance ■ 10' or 20%, existing ■ 36' or 72% r. - itire ds of inces srely Gm Zoning File #1142 May 1, 1987 Page 2 of 5 Required » 50' Existing = 70' Proposed =50' No Variance Required 0-75' Setback Area = 25,017 s.f. Allowed =0 Existing = 18,428 or 73.6% Proposed « 15,862 or 63.4% 75-7^n* c^;k ?"’P''oven’ent in Hardcover 75 250 Setback Area = 5,100 s.f. Allowed = 1,275 s.f. Existing - 5,100 s.f. Proposed « 5,100 s.f. No Change !. Section 10.41,Subdivision 9 Lot Area Requipd = 2 acres or 87,120 s.f. Existing = .71 acres or 31,117 s.f Variance = 1.3 qj- 55^528 s.f, . Section 10.41, Subdivision 9 Setback for ParVitiM »Required -30' cjc for Parking Proa Street Lot Line Existing = 0* Proposed * 10' Variance - 20- or 66.6«, existing 0- or 100% frslips"’^^' 5 <») Parking Requirements 79 Slips Required = 48 Parking Stalls Proposed ^ 42 Variance = 6 Stalls 6 stalls per munlc?pafVa'’rk^^Vl^^“on^we?xVnd"s^hen^ the serious problem for the marl^rwLn ISul-s f1 .“hf ^^ty. Parking was a operation shared the facility boat rental and boat functional stalls. In the la^t 2 vear2 f? '“>°“t 112 with 43 parking has not been a problem. y®*'® "^th Paul s operation now gone. "■ sSouJd'plant ’ingrte r"qulrerin''!r V plantings. Shoreline Drive or along%reen areas of shore!ine! to Zoning File #1142 May 1, 1987 Page 3 of 5 than ifme rock. The’^rock tuSlcing“oreatel“a^M “h filter fabric adjacent tl a arasa ® tap with narrow grass strip adjacent to lakl^W-:* along the surfaced with bituminoL covering anfpa^^ lanes must be posted alonq the we<?f designated. Fire structure. ^ ®°^bh sides of the principal J. Review of Conceptual Building Plans contain guLt/member^^areL? restrooms^^and^off 1 second floors caretaker apartment is of concer^becausein a commercial district. The enniioar.4.1 ®®^^®^bial use is not permitted not of immediate concern and a??ron ol advised that this use is delayed. Staff would suggest a nioht caretaker apartment can be ca%%t\*l.^/rs^r siL sirn’il°\ ‘:i^ni"t"%-^ apartment for years a^^tks ne";e"r"l^^^e^e^d°rn ^?c^en^se-^U^!^ expensivi^boa\s° an*d otU?‘’eq“i‘pment®owned‘^^ keeping oftype apartment (non-rental unit) as a moane ^ <r ©ts, the use of a caretaker and theft appears a reasonable comoatible tiQ*» against vandalism be amended to allow the uset^th'^^^rcif'AVof^^^ Applican^muit submit ^Ws° "inf ™!on°fo°^"K''^ building must be shown, review and approve. information for the Planning Commission to house‘’mustTe"tprink°/ed'’® Building Code, the new club supply, the DNR must review aL i“s\"ue pe^it. “ Issues to be addressed: Mrdc'^v"er'irnttTje\\ab?^^ Providing 880 s.f. of varied deck platforms that existA^ structures and with the lakeshore walkway section of ®. Staff takes issue must be limited to 4 feet width Tb^ structure. All walkways must be adjusted to meet 4 ffet allowed wid“^ way) should^be°protected^with^r^^ public right-of- understanding that the entire «?hnrgiven the rapped but applicant should confirm “Psurface water drainaqe olan rh^r-m r • rapping, the should be installed.^ ^ ^ filter fabric - see Exhibit G) 5ther ) the .d be with f the d be Fire ipal h • Zoning File #1142 May 1, 1987 Page 4 of 5 constructed without^^^ buiIdina^^* advised that the new deck has b lefr-® allowed width of 6 fee?." because th? doc?^idth. Once aoain * • The dock (or rather deck) ic 0*^ this dock construct inn*p • ^ included). Has the t Mr*n*o.. „c. sr"* s Recommendation a) Hardships - m4et'^«qu°red“etback!!'’ to allow structures to protecteri«a"^:hlre\''o" h/rdcover or itrucfure'ls'alloted"’'*®''®"* b) Findings - rowea. years and was recentI’^i® rezoned Vo WTn®V975^. "ver 40 overall hardcover /iraddltiVTto ® reduction of lot in runoff prior to enterinrVakl*° quality of stonn wate? h;rdVoleV&iaVelV’VdTa“to'^^^^^^^^ * «-^®=tion in with^p^oVo’se^d” sV^n\Vrs\?uV^Ve^VkVnr/oVa"^^" ‘"P-ved the severely limited land areV ^ "'°p* «tfi®lent use of The following conditions apply to this approval, 1- Parking areas to be paved and stalls designated. time oVW rlppinV™ runoff treatment to be Installed at for a r the ships Zoning Pile #1142 May 1, 1987 Page 5 of 5 alteration of •exll?ing‘'doo\.‘° ‘’“i l-J^^rptr^nflt °for allowed 4 feet width.*'° so that width does not exceed of credit to ssure^^h^folloti^f lntta?fed:®’=‘®' a) Drainage/surface water treatment plan. b) Paving of parking area. C) Erosion control installation during construction phase. M es to shore it 40 V :!-:v ' Vk-' -..- . Jl % in ater n in Id I.'. I- •v>' . -a.., w--iL«. ^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIMICB APPU catk W uatG Kec'a </-/3 - v6 65 Initial AT applicatioh property location - -- --- - Site Address _ /9S6- A Property Identification Nuinber , Please check one - is the property abstract ---!!-j!!!i.i«^ription to application 77* aPPLICAUT required survey. Name i C> . -- - --- - - -- — Phone (work) •) «//Address: A^o . °®*^®^c>Perty Acquired 7Cs^r /'i ,- /? / /!k ^ City: // (month/yearJ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District _ Present Use of Property ~ -- - --—-- - -- Pesidential iSiiimm'S'Sss;--- - - - - - - - - - -__ variances REQOl^ Area Setback Variances ( Other hot Width Front Hardcover iiT^Slde Rear) m hardship r. resulting fron. strict "DeJcribe^u^^al^pr"®*’®"*^ CONDITIONS ------------------------ code Saqulrements conait locs preventing co^pUa„pe with Zoning ■■ Mil Ml_______' HEQDIRBD submittals 1. completed Application Form 3. 5. Certificate of survey includino hy xnciuding hardcover calmia^.^_Plat Map. ^calculations as required. applicaht • .........~----------------------------------------------------------------- All© ll © ^ ^ r ®®~” .‘."tfifecc to the best of his/her Date Applicant's Signature 0W*n3RS SIOHaTnpp -------- ------- The owner hereby ackowle,, ----------------- CXirnAT*9» _____ ^^ner's Signature third Monday of each *^lanning Commission Mlltt before the •^'View meetings of th„ ‘^. Dr«l„"^®* ®" the ( ( < ^010 S^C^^L INF f)Ri VE WAYZA 1 A MN 55391 38 10-11 ?-23 31 ccB, OANIEL CREAR I960 SPATES AVE >*AyZATA MN 55391 3Q 10-117-23 42 COOS A G ASCHENBECK JR 1930 SHORELINE DRIVE l»AYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 42 0015 H TOURANGEAU 2060 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 craig ^olson ’^^ I960 SHORELINE OR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0CC8 ^'ARIETTA H ANDERSON 2055 SPATES AVE ktAYZATA MN 55291 terry D MORSE 2CeO SPATES AVE CPONO MN 553SI E POEIE WAYNE APT 126 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 I'vin 3®"*1T-23 42 0017 1-YlE VICKFRMAN interlachen la fXCELSICR MS 55331 38 10- 11 7-23 31 JCHN T SPENCE 20 40 ^0 SHCRF DR WAYZATA MN 55391 0C02 ^*^“117-23 31 0C90 RICHARD V STINSON 2040 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-11 7-23 42 0007 / ^AN NETTLES S ANNE NETTLES 1940 SHORELINE DR ORONQ MN 55391 .1980 HEPI TAGE OR WAYZATA MN 55391 ( • • - .... TOTAL LABELS BATCH 003 00017^ 2a 10-117-23 31 009o SPATES TORmNGEAU 2060 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 BCX 176 CRYSTAL BAY MN 5532i 38 10-U7-23 42 0021 CANIEL CREAR 1980 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 ( r r-M M-wT-c f' Ooie. uiejLj fT ■U I 1 :c tl I ' y^kuiT ______________ "S^yr^S ^A/p ■73 ---•— i;>r- _ . wes \/i /h/tCSr 'T^are,.. /V^/Zy/74 <2>7^^7yOyJ. /A/ a<&4>s/e.. _ 7b . /?7S4.t . 77/e, . M£a>^, /<*Aca C>^.. tfo«.__TP^'StAs__75*4- TSic* 5x7X COtCt^ ___ ^fe, '^&eA4rrrpc» . ”55£^»9ri,--- /? ^/e,^ ATT/2ac77t)^ .fySy^yT^^ ^A/rt.4 Aj.CC_________ /) de»mpcte*>ty>^ ■7^ f/fi (SfryfyTTayJy^... ._ -. Sx.ptaJtTyAJC ‘ J rh- ••* % # 4 • « < 7?/fc '^T4fC,. . _. ^*Ss4rS -4*40 "SaJiTt^ -Ottiy^--------- - ■yVti, 'TUio &^At.s CutU. ‘Si,, .— ^ AeAit.oo> /J .,r72>. __ /VoOL, 7i> ,_ <4 4^ss. ___ ^5 £,.. of __ __ ^JZijfT7Aj4^ 4 , (2z>/9f^7^1ScJL^ S»^r77^^ ----- A 'if^T 4/f^ ^->) rwt, AnJt> o<JSjc. £AcM -Oic/Cfrij _ f53w <Zcom^ , <M€c4, TicsMffAms €c.t: ----- U}^ (Jitcj TUt^ Tife<3vf^c-r-^ 2>a --- Ti^ 18S A'D^CfiMir' <2>cjk J£^S ^ ( » f ’f I ^i£/<^A»Scx^ /4sol>j 'TT/L- 1 j^AKte /y?^ncA A^A - - - #> «r: K .....^ ,I o • ^ i______H IWKV** >>« .^i. /9<5b" CO/CC !! ii II 'TOT/f^C Ao^fCfSi. OS/<)ft. /^x77«,2 l. X??fe / ^'S>T»<tlC(j2. ^'CC. 4 -n C<Jfm>a. d/ZM^T' i (^'72/ ^V5' -^/3L€ 77/- '^/2.^:^y%J^ i » - t V€/>^ Ciut^co, ^/?5^A<D.^rZJ^ Ajc ifA/O ■\'^0(r- Splice. Oa/ 6tZ4,^ ^ t'/tTZ/ AtOC4_ •«© -= -TO '1^ 1 :^'”‘=. at 4 4^,^ i 0^6>^aX:4, O^ /'y ,q # 4, tj <-^B4sO^^ AJ^C4„ ??y ^ 4 1 ■** ^ • • . # - , t •!1 Setback from Lakeshore (929.4) Existing Proposed Undefined 15’ Bunding Setback from Lake (929.4)9*50' Setback from Lot Line 0-10’10’ Total Area •31.117 sq. ft.31,117 so. ft. Structures ^ « Total Hardcover ^.0/6 sq. ft.1,258 sq. ft. 23,528 sq. ft.20,962 SQ. ft. % Hardcover 0/]t 67% Green Space - _ Parking Spaces J.903 Sq. ft.10,155 sq. ft. 43 42 Transmission . Boat Parking 0 7 Parking 10-12 t 11 Total Area _10,731 sq. ft.10,731 sq, ft. Building Area 1.283 sq. ft.1,283 sq. ft. Total Area .. _14,569 sq. ft.14,569 sq Building Coverage 2,516 sq, ft.0 sq. ft. Total Hardcover 3,867 9,005 X Hardcover _ db,b%68% Setbacks: Front 4 M t Side 14*10* Rear 0*10'5*10* j(^ 3.02, Subd. 6 Rev. 12-23-82 Subd • 6, ExtorisTrf^ area oror.. »o. „, Subd. 7. Unusual r,^«.r- - V^ere tHe p.ov..,o„s o. coSlirt°bet5eei?°thi^”® extenSd*^io“ “"“sufl*^co^ sites as th^use o? .if”"®''® two or moreeni ‘^^''^es a areas or other Qt-m same area of the 1al> ^^acent or nearby owner of any of th' affeci-^H ^®®®°^able access^^K^^' mooring variance pursuant sites may aoDlv^J^^ff thereto, the permit the appU^n? variLc^ a ordinance or tb) .^^i^’J^erent from other or j^arby siti\^o do ^0"”^" a^ja^^t Subd* 0, Dockc • r\-* pofts?^„" in 12, sec. iru\t^ir, Vs"i;„Ufd,%rr* ing areas otJiLi i^M!^^^^^ Recjuiremenrc; ^ ^ v j, established which n r n ommer ci a I docJcs shall <^ocks or moor docking a greater or are us^h '^^^t^^oted or of continuous shorelin^^^''watercraft than one for^ "'ooring or surements dete^inlna % existence on May 3 i^,o feet the provision of nu^er of watercraft aV7®* ,mea- including one half A/2T '^^^orcraft, any frilt't^'^ result in one half (1/2) shal/^ii?^®^^ disregarded^ anH to and Amended Ord. No. 40)^^ additional watercraft!^°^(As°''^^ ^ f*OUiT OT* ^ and'^with^th^^^^'i' “hfch'"is" o\®he?w/se ?/ ^ny dock or and wh?ch ni the l?cal\?„T^^® «ith thfs code August 30, 1978. ® ®ite which is in® eTi"s\'e°nce^‘'oS°”'^^ !} ) 5 lA 2 OBCK ,g=^- : o o \'F=J w W l ^ 1 1 \\\ ^ H \\\ ■o o \ Ui ATEN V- t>ECK I ^ILlNCa \^ASX)^JJB I =iir- ' «»• #f • •%’ % MIST. FUOORi \ , ,,r w ^ Pv»*< ^ C 6ft <tT^iacY"/e/V dA /V,v \ 3 :PX- ------------------------------- iJ ! >■■¥'', V .{'■ ■• t- r-1 '• S / j. --’******_/. ~* ' ^ / »4 ? JA- ' \ly __I- .QU---- §t0Cl i ® ^ ^ 1 j- * •» , V 4 • * /Af-1 \t \ iH,*» ....fCL-^i-x-i—1—j__ h -.J' \ - 1 “"»-• ui_ —:-^rEX^._ ;<;.. ->r^f. il \ \ \ k ' "%'*t j» ^ V' ti f HJiTra •4fc*-wi ^il« dwelling Subdivision 3 (d) the i ■ *s as follows: '"'’® ">inxmum area required per A.) Structural units 44 cabins 20 motel units 3 staff cabins ‘JHit- require 67 acres (l unit n \ m IJ- unit per acre) Tenting units 25 tent sites 13 acres required (l acre per 7 ^ sites) Comparison Dwelling Density A.) Former density = 31 cabins + Berg Hall / 1.1 acre pir u^lt 20 units/) required . i ,,,, B.) Proposed Denisty PrgSsed II lamp“'=sites Keq;i;:d^-rac- ^ Improvements such s-s The sections noted <« «.u specific structur^f beginning of hh • site sewage disoi'af detectors in sleL? Permissible (i.e. - ^11 structures - anv or requi^e^ ^d^quate on «^fety issues. ^‘^"riard deali^ng tith Ul?, betweenFUDiic health or life Purpose of Phase 3 Staff has schedued eppu‘c:„\\7%\rfd"i ‘ «'<-'Vo‘?ssrst‘^ “^l-^repurposes in^deteVnfi ? guidelines and a f/,„ end the Island camp. Prior k” ^^^^sptable levol'^°f^ discussion ° applicant, staff The following issues must be addressed •1 addressed m Phase 3 review. Review Intent of the r«; • Plan 4/31 (Exhibit j) Comprehensive Management ^•) Is th© **VA;^r intent of the rs Dis^t^Mct^^o consistent with hi s^^sonal - summer only caUnV)'°""' ■ ^“"""-^/winter (but no overnight <^-lll„g IS required for adwellina sites)/ jf an acre aside for a d 1 n 1 n^g ha^,'S'ea shouId be Accessory structures'^ wHa^ • i i or other proDosed density for the 57 aire sUe^^ acceptable residential a«) previous level at • b.; less units because units accessory day recreatiortype «“PPort 2. Should the applicant k,. in liqht* o/ independent cabin ^structnrf^^^ acceptable beca"usT\he^*^available? . cabln/low profile, and‘lLs“ moterfuVy® aeasona/7surir 3. What about the mrii-i:.! *. >7e designated to handle ha?:5!cappir“I‘^°"' atructures can can «n7frm‘‘tfat'’!if ^rf£fL"‘‘ 'eriftbactV'-“°eta7l Of Assessors fair ™arL\“‘v%1gr^lJ%?rctu ‘“ "ose%har Subdivision 4 ro) Rnor^ip- i °xle\inq”bo°t^h *'ith“^7Wee"t°"orth“ ‘k® ionjidd{^4 ^ boat house would reauire a ^ shoreline. The'tT' 5. The Code refers to several ^ must be addressed by the anoii ^™®*^9ency preparedness steos tha#.3&v.,5;.r —‘HH ' The ®obv\^o^J ’V\""d?cay ’p%dat -"'su::er‘°:o„\h°s"7 operatlorper?o^ b») What about tornados*^ whpr#» uon ishelter? wnere would the guests seek ™iltrpXo'^e'’recrea\^%^""a/ea°l^^^^ t*" * 3») Limit on number of quests and if oc«>aKi i u j l controll? ^ established, how to recreation facilities place%*‘ir™!t‘s° o^^^a1^L^"e a°2a.°' p;iorto^p"pata\\“ln* ^ JUNE, 1980 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE °«-°9esr owned by the Wayzata Country Club, Woodhill Country Club and Hcrienefl^r; technically r>ri^.^.TZVZ aie“as provide"®"e*tts to all nearby residents plus active recreational facilities for many Orono and lake area citizens. recreational LAKE MINNETONKA ISLANDS orJvatelv^L''^d^2‘'' Mahpiyata Island and Deering island has been ^ ^ years and has been used for a significant of^OrLo^ seasonal cottages plus a few year-round homes. The City islands effective public services to these ^ are siaAifinsn^ f because of fire, vandalism rates trananorifi? ' sanxtation and garbage problems exist, and been ^1?" difficult. Therefore, it has long of the island!^ encourage eventual public ownership lands as recreational resources for general lake users. *2'°““’® control by the Hennepin County S? “®®^ appropriate agency for this purpose. o^L^e.’' conversion is . necess«l?y slow Jc?lJrscou?Ltt^ encourage condemnation oractive acquisition programs. The City does encourage the Park ^vH^ibie "irir rr ^.ciZTresidenf<Ai i” interim, the City will continue to allow rural lilt A subject to strict enforcement of all performance standards and the explicit understanding that the City will never be able to provide even basic public services. CHP 4-31 •T«f^ ■n/V ^, , ;. :;:^ ’ ... rii i ^ i? ZONING PILE NO. 1133 pf” Box^se"” notice op pianming commission action -2!!!ll^^:.l”...f”i3____473-7_357 Bate of Notice, 4/21/87 Roaa Long Lake, MN 55356 „ ^ Streety N 55356 Wayzata, MN 55391 Chris Hughes Gronberg/Coffin Office 482 Tamarack Avenue - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Long Lake, MN 55356 Subdivision DATE OP MEETING: 4/20/87 VOTE: 6 For Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Tabled: For reasons noted below MOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Office if you have any questions on this request. ^ Existing Proposed Allowed or Required Variance 5.6'5.6*10* 4.4* or 44% 3.4*3.4*10* 6.6* or 66% 9.8*9.2*10* 0.8* or 8% 18*18*0’ 18* 3.4%3.4%0% 3.4% (no change) 52.9%61.7%25% 36.7% ”1 'x47')f jarage 12'x24* se. change ) which itfiahee Mao« aide. ig th# Zoning Pile #H3g April 29, 1987 Page 2 of 3 ^sue I - Side SetbaclcR, bavlbh°: 12 house extention to crea<-«^'^^^ neighbor as of this wrlf-i^ '^'inimal. We from the sid<^ i <>4- 1^^^^^te room for the = / writing. Also, the variances. Staff has no ”coneeptua^ oroS?®ceptual problem with these Average AXthough thciro wl l i Kca vs Thf proposed'’addiM|n*’^fl®l ^^L^th^ lakeward than so?e-S --?fe rth^^;t;S:^" - - apllcanfs house. These *•“ atory deck ?^ov' ‘he west... ■..../»;-s,xx,r."'s^"%i3;5?.F.¥. s; The oronne^a _______ - '-‘Jncern. Will have'’no'’tfltcnrtii®r^ intended to have a railing, and Issue III - Hardcov,.,. Commission and Council rarefv i, ® "'ajor issue on this 7 » of 50% except in obv^;„» approved 75-25o" hs'li Planning an increase from 50% to % ,t ^'’^P situations, and even ‘be rang? this one, refer back t" c V booking at a ty^cal sno??''® "rely allowed L®S®. a-aa?:fth^Vn°ir°m" "7®i-'’®b .“10 s"bo ...------irom s>o% tc this one, refer baok <-.^^''''7 at a tvolcai ^«xeiy allowed add^S lYrV;iro ‘w"ed%<^L"'^ aTi^c-^se-fn^t^^ there'w^sVlm^st no 0-75. to 52i°5a ““r^ 0.2o'acres; where the "xistina t»o.. hardcover, in fact a ne. .“owed, again where ran% of tlV?o ?oV ‘l'P“"^l''°bfrTcfver botalfy if the^ls'^-Ysf consistent w^tf ct“?^— frcm^firtt ^2^ i^ Staff agrees thaf- to not have to back on ♦- P*^®P®rty needs a drivewav Ka/^u asked to discuss what h\r^*K^° Point Road. Howeve^ ann'i^- order «=».« .-..j; iiv.vrtl.nKi; -r"-*'-'---* large as proposed? A, Page 3 of 3 Staff Recoamendatioii - fnor®"® hardcover pJrrn.‘ thl need fo. «»=»« ;;.“"i;.^' “ wr.,.*.-,. Vi"7;4";u;“' j'roS;;>“* “»■ «"«.»1. •,., ,, -“ «>lo" or ..Ml„ No f?oon,panyI„g proPP3Yl'®or in photos of his l,ir k Application fom does nof these photoa k •““•• • ”5.:‘UB‘oS “!"- ”*• !••". v.*r.v,,-.roS-L* ^ (F" ciTy OP Senewai fee $l50.o7(s '‘f '-lCATlON propehty locAnw------------ ^auG t<ec o -J - j w_il-7 J-on) Site Address ^ Property re-ntificatlT^- - - -p, cation Number lease check one - .. l--.le._aX__.eacr.pt.on to A pplicant 4H ^P-I.D.) '"‘"'® IhoaiLi/ ____ Address: (if diff ^ame j‘1 Address: £j r. - '' ' 7 . ifr''c:Vv^ abstract or I, "”"• '»-~'27:;t:-----'---‘-‘'- l'>C v^ p, ------------ --------— Phone (work) ®rent than ------------'JE523:;applicant) Phone (home) Phone (work) ^te Property Acquired ^ (do City* Zip: (nion th/year) parcels Of Xsric3, Present Zoning Dist ^^esent rict Use of f-i? - /c Propert *^rnm mmmm _ _ _‘'—11 ''ARIANCBS Pesid ential—-Hf.ifPeo.fy) _ Rst.mated ConatrTZrj ^------------------- onstioct.on Cost $ -------- rvy? 'A-ka..^ hr, - i^t Area Setback Other Variances ( i-ot Width Pront ^ a“^^dcovex* Side Pe :^r) f f i HARDSHIP entorctLTol difficulty resulting fro». strict P ONDSU a £‘;rop ERTODescribe CodrR:qulrement\r°''^“^ <=°"<^ltlons'preventlng coi^pUance with Zoning CONDITIONS ^qdired submittals VilP Completed Application Form ...... to each Of the *7 *7 . .. «-et:urn address. — ''"■ ^®^tificate of survey incinrHr»« u ^y ncxuding hardcover caion 1^4-4Plat Map. ca-^culaticns as required. wpiicAMT-s ——- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Applicant's Signature owners signature ~ - -—-_ _ _ Date Owner's Signature Applicant ^ -- - - - - --- - - -_ _--.ji- --- - -—— Date _ ">ents to have an iut^° » scheduled meetino ^«" Uuilding t Zoning Office'^of thia"^'’*'*®'’'’ ^““^’place in^t'l^ldice Of this change prior to thc^lting. «he •;i " v.v Adjacent Property 'dwneirs* Ackiiowledgejnent Form (we) j).'1 7T~'y y’i:Y{ I print name(s)J 7c ’n y<Y 'v 4*^of V::-7 Iprint address]'Cr^2) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at .iso referred to as Land Use Application No. _ii32.* I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely, to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the Improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 7 ( — fLk±£J^Prbperty Owner 7^/^ 7 \ : X *K4- information that may assist the Cltv in the review e. i Mjacent Property ■ < On " Por„ have reviewed the plans for th ^ — -ceted at ^ ^ —d eee of the ----~^' also referred° as Land Use ^ fwe) understand that in <«-) not eshed to declare approv^mi t, i ,„e, an. to confirm for the city c Property or use ‘He improvement plans and that the 7"'' ^'" requires Council approval. "eighbor-s project or use a u Application No. Jj^£_. C Property Owner Prb^iFty OvfKS? Date Y <£ this Land°Uae^s® Inft-rmation thae Zoning Office .PP^^^oation, please submfe assist the City in th rice at least lo days prior ^^^r comments to the o review of Ptlor to the echeduled meeu°ng'’|a®““^'"3 * Prepared for* CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY , IRonc^ld E. Domshar_ _ _ _ _ _ * ‘)) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1101 Spring Park, and that part of Lake Shore Avenue, now vacated, lying between extensl^n across it of the side lines of said lot and including the land between said vacated avenue and the shore of Lake Minnetonka, lying between extensions across said strip of land of the side lines of said Lot 118, according to the recorded plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. vr ji ...'L O) ■ P (j) 5U«eV6^V general hotes: Denotes iron monument Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denctes proposed spot elevation Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denote proposed features Solid contour lines denote existing features ■ «II ii93i.3m Proponed top of foundation elee. • Proposed baseeent floor elev* • Proposed garage floor elev. • QEHCKHARKI ALL-METRO _LANJ?. SURVEYORS 2 340 Donisit Sfrstf Mimitta Ph: 475-K Lots, 53356 I hproby certify that this Survey, plan or report ^e prepaied by «e or under »y direct supervision a^ that I mm a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the lavs of the Sta:a t^A-'-e^-Jlinnesota. scats r»50* sooa iF*at 1 rw. ritc ec y • ^ ^ glBUFICATE OF Sfn^ypY Prepared for 2 ■Ronald E. PomqhAr '■> o |*EGAL DESCRIPTinM? *^1 LakpU^ Park, and that part ofLake Shore Avenue, now vacatod extension across It of thi sid.1 between lot and including the land avenue and the shore of Lak« vacated between =xtensiS Across laiS str^*’"''^ ,of the side lines of said for cS;„t “r *" Q '-^f5 I: !' i SMAvrv wim APPLiCAAtfs AeoAojeb f»^oir7oA>s ’V '^/yf U general notes f Denotes iron nonuffient Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevatloM Denotes proposed spot elevation Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denote proposed CeMtures Solid co:itour lines denote existing features «93l.3m Proposed top of foundation elev, • Proposed baseaent floor elev, « PropoMd gw^age flo.- eiev* # BENCHMARK: <-«MLL:Id£IlRO LAND ^myEmSs ^ i340 Don tii Strttf Leas tots, Mmnatefo 5535ft th* Survayar under th. U-s of I ft . : I h ^^SHOCATE OF sirnypiy Prepared for!-Ronald R, r LEGAL DESCRIPTTnM* >! T extension across it of tho a?*>' between lot and Including thf laid avenue and tho shore of Lake vacated between extensions across sa<d lying of the side lines of land the recorded plat tLreof to In tho office of the Real record for Hennepin County. Mi^iesita? ^5/ iiAiWW i^iru STAFF tOoTes } * \ \ \ * 5KcT?'rt C/v'if/l **?rArF yUvT/rr/OAiv -ff ex/irir^c. r general WOTESf OCRotes Iron noniusent Denotes cross chiseled In concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elevation “* Denotes surface drainage Dashed contour lines denot. proposed features Solid contour lines denote existing features s»3l.3m Proposed top of foundation elev. Proposed baseeent floor elev. • Proposed garage floor elev. » SCNCHNAilXt -AJUlcMEJiJRSLJiAND SURVEiffl^ - • 340 OMiatt Sfrt«f 5r™r- ?' —I am a duly Registered * "wpervision end that t he State-I*:2?n^!. Surveyor under the lews of S:?>‘T' Pit ♦ M-rm, at»~e<-^ inneseta. ®^^W>COVER REVIEW 2821 Casco Point ^otai tot Area - 13 geo . " »^“8 0-75. . , «°res ot Area = 4,500 s.f. Existing 0-75• Hardcover Stair 3’x24» Platform 4»x8'4/ Shed 6'x8^/f Lot Area » 9,360 s.f. 75-350 • Hardcover 72 s.f, 32 s.f. 48 s.f. 75-250' -152 s.f. or 3.4% 1/860 s.f. 580 s.f. 258 s.f. Detached Ga^gi^‘2^6^^, Concrete Walkf Block Wan 258 s.f. ock/Plastic Near House (3x24) I'J: Plastil'r 2 «4- deck and conneoUng titta‘>®^^«Pl1Tce'?witi,'’a Proposed 75-250- Hardcover House Addition (12x31) s-f. Sidewalk (5xll)+(70x2.9)+(4x29' Detached Garag4 ®*f.Bloc)c Wall 580 s.f. “-iveway (22x60^(20x14, • Deck 12x24 2,095 s.f. Sidewalk 3x26 ®-f. 78 3,f. S.775 s.f or 61.7% - SKC. lo 09 ®'’al/app!'!"'’°'« Residential 'DUt'17'^:' "«-“! o^ WSTRi^t.' —ct t.e to:Io;/n, from the shnrfi • f-akeshore q«f. » S?st“a'„o"e ‘7.oT F -^-ent a„^d°n^a\*'4?o?s!^^- f Sub<3 2 L 1. ' °n hardcover limitations \ I \ f 75-2‘^0 * 701"^ ” ^^rdcover aii 7«;n cV!; 2one - 25% p=,».^ allowed 2one - ina allowed-Jo«ed 7,5*^** hardcover ‘ ’ X 100 » percentage of nQirdcnv^V. .*I Area of lot la zone (so. ft.) -—'-ciM.aae of hardcover in zone V'' 'x^, \^ \ \r/30 Auw'>“' •nS.*/ c- V* s-o M bi <.4DU U oi u > ou § o so u (U•a 5 o O T3 •H M •H (0 < ja 0) rU > 4J O C (D U U Q)a no 0) 03 o u 0) >ooanoO M u (d 04 ^ o 0) o O^iH td 4J yc Q) ^ o < M •!• (D Qa-- T30 0) o u (D >oo 0 M M rd 01 ^ 0) o N c 'H cn (Dc > •H O 4J U 03 no •H u X (d M x: o 0 o CTtH fd 4Jc (Uo 0) < CQ CL'-" u cr- (D c > •H O 4J O 03 •H M X (d M x: oco N c •H 0^ rdc •H 4J 03 •H 4J O rd 0)co N X o c W *H *H u o « a: ucn < M Od Qi < W c ^ c/) N c o nO o\ 44 03 0 >? 0 in CN oN$ s5 44 03 C\ vSi \5 om inm >S 44 03 44 03 yO 0^NP 44 44 44 4^ 0 0 0 0 1 cS M-l M4 44 44 (0 0 0 0 0 0Cs NT m >0- M -o ••O o in o O o in in fH 1 CN I 1oIoo in m o CN in I •0 \a 03 C O •H 4Jo CD U •H o rd 43 f-4 •H oJ3 >1 U 44 O (D tP rd 4-> oo 44 CD U rdocr 03 rH d 4J O 44 0x: 44 a 0 43o rH oc •H I 03 rH rd O O iH O iH >i*H >1^ X3 (U in 0 03 rd 0 J4 (DC C ro 0 C TJ O >1 0 > -H •H N 1—) *H a a)1 0U) a-p •H cn E 44 TJ *0 -H -H 4J (U 0 0 C - 1 a ooco CD crc •H 4J rH C rH P C 0 (0 3IT>-H u rH 0 0 Q (0 c x: 0 (0 -Q 4^ 0 •H 4J ^E P U«-H M . +J -H E w 3 0 C >1 « ? 3 D C -H •. ^ •H C rH C >i'D 0X m a 0 U 0 rH 0 01 0 0 0 x; N rH 0) 0) 0 x: p •PC 0 o 0 u-i n) 4J 0 E 0 p a u0 u-i >>13 x: 0 0 0 J-i >1 0 XJ rH 4J C P c0 a xj 0 . o 0 aO' w »a OlU 4J O 0(d CQIP 0 P XJ■PC/) 0 C C 0 • 0 0 3 c x:•«H *iH 4-) 0 > 4J 0 O -H C O O O4-1 *H P 0) 0 C 0 C > P C 0 0 0 0-0 0 P 0 *H XJ O' -H M >1 P 0 .fl 4J E 0 T3 P 0 0 to a E w 3 -P rH 0 x: E 3 E 3 -H C C 3 >cr 03 0x: 4J H I c X 0 •H JZ rd V4 0x: 4J 03 0'O x: O 4J rH oc •H -p x: 4J 0 ^ 10 •H 0 > T5 •H O O 13 H o I U 0 0 43 0 •H 43 > 4J 0 Oo x: U 03 0 & D o rH rd rd Ccr o •H ^ 44 I I c: rd c I 0co 0cc Ni 0co N c •H rd 0u < 43 0 •H 44 •H CD 0 c •H 43 0 > rd O. V4 0 >ou uo 0cr rd 4Jc: 0uu 0 04 I 0co 0 0 03 cr 0 rd CT- c E O rH o CD •H •H 0 44 JUo 4J •H 0 0 Oc 0 •H 0 > 44 O 0x; 44 C H 44c 0u M 0 04 44 O 03 H 0 rH 0 > 0 u 0 >ou 0 44c 0 0 u 0 01 c •H 0 0 tno •H 44 •H iH •H 0) 0x: CD 44 0 E 0 C O N crX) 0 x: cr 44 c -H 44 C H 03 x; H 4J Xw •r-» 5 cr c •H 4.» 03 •H Xw J h 0 > o u J h "C3 C3' P J h 0 0 K a: 0 >1 CT'D U 0 >oo 0 44 c 0ou 0 0 0 > •H 34 C •H 44 03 •H Xu 0 03 O CLTJ O U H 0o. x: 34 0 > o U T3 0 34 • K 0 34 a: 0 T3 > 0 03 O 5a o O fH 0 M rH x: 04 < 44 u 0 >oo H 03 03 O CL'O P 0 0 ax; x: 44 no 0 •H MH •H U 0a 03 c •H oo T3 0 o rH 0 rH 0 03 0) 13 o •H TJ Crc •H 44 0 •H X 3h 0 > Oo u 0 0 x: O 'H 441 44 O O <UP M 04 i i C/) Aaa cna ggL CQ O Q Qb 1 I /'V-4 «V'"^| um\k: '^1 ev^ rX: 1’ */« j\)'i ■■/ST? ^ “'||j||»W 'f; * •'» >tf*'f' jLV^k^L»y i*d 4 , ,.4: W-i2-M\-f'-'^'mm. ir>'v ‘it’ ■S5 ^ '•'M "mm wmmm i> f^'H^ ^ ./ ’’t i ‘7 ' ^ ‘'I . ^ / :t 'viN^ ■ipl \ <h i I i f, 'VR.' m ii'C P&mi w In 0 WiU V*'T* ,^v'vW. ■» . **' «Vl«^ BM W**»iA L ' ■ • .' »* : • w/.'K'L^ 2^h.\ hmS, Ili^K CiNt 1 ^1 \ 1 /s. tv ) • mmu> - ^ z 5^4 ‘l-s ozoa: O u. O ^>0 0) C '.ox: 0. ■«^ §a 5S « o L) C rj C -a O > H O c _^ s> srr *o c 3 *503 < co j3 o ina f3 Q co oa CL inc \ Q i tv ■ J > Ci c c ow. iZ u ozocr O u. O <D C O . j SJ /C) V H O c •5 3 o 2 c>uc COc -av«o co 3ca Cic >•O*o < O n o i> lAa «s Q Co 4-»o d> CL CA C nsa • i ino ox: GL oa CL (Ac fO Q t/>o o I Ofi o jCa. o;; CL ^ Ms^ H«i @ ^ ■ O ^ » >■) tV •• * t • '* ^ • ■*-» ■- f. >T 'Ill * I'.!uu, .. Ifs ( V it . T. •.' :s^^-V'-L- Pk'»i icirvll'’ *> - / ' ,v Ir'v,-, ;'*'' ' •A V * I • \ ; r 4tlS m ^ -gkt, iL ' ^>1 > IV ^4- ^-f; -wl - >>:kp. . 'ivwr« itj ^«*.l '1' '* I'^v^ “•;'«.^:-'>.\iAli >*o.r^o *Vk 4> M C c oNl ^1 (Ucox;a. Ozo (Xo 01 V o' S^ ^ 'Ol ^d-5 <T)|/^ b.o i(t oocac -o w. O a v — <1) o> *5 3 1ca < O co 2o \ r 1 •r til3 T« Ci O Zocr O tuo > H; O (/) Cl rj Q co (Ja CL COc oz c>oc C3 C ['■ A k '' U (/)o XI O d O co co 2g > a (i> CLtoc 0> d COo o XI CL mm npy f r..... S' U. M C Co N CDc •. Ox: O 2 O cc O u. O noc (/) ooca c to CD •av« O a Q co co 13ca XD X) < Q}c n o o Cicx (/)c >1 \ o t IXc 1 1 — c o N4 •fw Q>ao JC CL \ C srj O Zo q: O u. O O y- H c 'O to 3 o 2 oac CTJ C COo T3v«o ca O co co CD -■=: T3 C ca < o ja o• > o CDca iOc caa uo (/I 2 a o a x: ^ OL. C fa Q to O Of osza. oH S;i III I i ZIr \\ \ r\'r' ■ \\ -"rv / ■ V V- /- KrI i- X II vv^• % ; fp vl- -'5: ,v :c j . ; V,'*. !^>. ' r\' • <'. *‘tm »xt ; 1.. S»IBe?^»!»eifrai|ttsLS^SS HEELS 1 Cfm r?’ m r'VV I ✓ C 'Ts h • ^ A »4^ 'fUOtLS'; 5C. fuviTTtLy-^.r'f.. Z-i’ic. (n.Liuu ts ijrhcrmt)ifr lij .(I 'I ! •! •;••? . * 1 ■ I . ^ y .t \ ' ’ '' I » * * V -;r.; ■r*” P? • II \ 1 II > 1 j »m|9 * C' ^-W I «. V 5»r™rjag'" , i^-r- "mm>- t To; i'^' v '4 hf,-' •: T^ f ■: : ^ ’• ■ ■■ y tv OronS^pLnniJJg^Co^i^^^^^"’®'' Kelley Michael P. Gaffron, Asst pi. April 28, 1987 ‘ Administrator subject.. ,1139 ^ Application - Hardcover aid ‘ contract addition to ^esidt^ce*?^"-’'' —setbao. variances to zoning District - lr-ic, Wst of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B — Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit p - Exhibit G - Pertinent Facts - Application Plat Map Survey ^ I'lst/^^eigh^or Acknowledgements Ha%^d^^°v"e%" Survey With s?a«Sketches of VI ,w Lines Hardcover - 0-75'. o ^oa 75-250 • ; 28.57%®eifsting"-"Sr°'’^'’®®® Proposed 250-500': 13?!?^ ^ Is for equal tradeoff Side Setback - Note: The ^®ting - no changes proposed ®ide®^o\"^i^e!°'''®Tllhn^SF^• Vra^^^^^ ‘he ----------still encroaching irto t ^ ^tached gavaac i f Average Lakeshore Setback - Th • ^-<J “^^53ToT-sfde setbacV. pcaSse^’llcUon^^^O?, Su^F^^®"^ w‘ith“n°" ^t/^he ’^®®^‘^®®ce. between a principal builrUn ^'^sion 12 in effect reom'r- ®^^sbing garago. deposing to attach the -o^rr^u/tur^s^b;^"- a roof between them. I1 ) f ’ Zoning File #1139 April 28, 1987 Page 2 of 4 Issue I - Attachment of Structures Reading through Subdivision 12, the definitions Section 10.02, and the remainder of the Zoning Code, there is absolutely no direction as to whether this type of attachment is sufficient to allow the two structures to be considered "attached" for any or all purposes. Building Inspector, Tom Jacobs, notes that the Building Code does not set a minimum distance between buildings, but does require various types of firewalls between them depending on the actual separation distance. He also suggests that in order to attach structures solely through a roof connection, the roof connection should be at least 36" in width, and must serve a purpose, i.e. in this case creates a covered walkway between two access doors. Tom feels that from a Building Code standpoint, the roof connection proposed does constitute attaching the structures. Prom a zoning standpoint, staff is uncomfortable with this type of attachment in relation to Subdivision 12, only because the intent of that section is not totally clear. We have always felt that the 10' structure- to-structure setback standard was for emergency access purposes, but does it also serve an aesthetic purpose? Is that why it has an exception built- in, i.e. exempting "integral parts of the principal structure" from the requirement? What is the definition of an "integral part of the principal building"? Staff's main concern is that we do not want to set a precedent that would result in frivolous connections between buildings to get around the 10' setback requirement. Is Planning Commission comfortable with the current proposal? Does Planning Commission wish to consider a future zoning amendment that better defines "attachment" of structures, and/or better defines the purpose of Subdivision 12? If Planning Commission is comfortable with the method of attachment, staff would request that Planning Commission add'ess what types of attachment might not be suitable. If Planning Commission is uncomfortable with the method of attachment because it in effect is "getting around the Code requirement", then are there any hardships or unusual circumstances about this case that suggest a structure-to-structure setback variance is appropriate? Issue II - Side Setback Note that the garage as it exists is 6.7' from the lot line. It was constructed a few years ago to replace a previous garage. At that time, staff did not require a survey since the property owners had agreed to where they thought the lot line was located and the proposed garage was 10' from that line. If the garage is considered as being attached, the the principal structure becomes substandard in side setback and technically a variance is required. If the garage is not attached, then perhaps an after-the-fact variance is appropriate to grant. . . In either case, the effect on the neighboring property is negligible because the garage is there and has been there. Note that under current policy, we would require a survey to construct a detached garage, avoiding the situation encountered with this application. 7 t « ♦ Zoning File #1139 April 28, 1987 Page 3 of 4 Issue III - Hardcover Hardcover tradeoffs are proposed to result in no net increase in 75- 250' hardcover. Applicants propose to remove 165 s.f. of concrete hardcover behind the garage in exchange for the 165 s.f, of net hardcover to be added with the proposed addition. Most of the addition is over existing structure or stone and concrete wa’kways. Issue IV - Average Lakeshore Setback - Viewlines Technically, the proposed addition encroaches no further lakeward from the average setback line than the existing house. Looking at the partial additional view encroachment from the southerly property, staff notes that from the side window view as shown in Exhibit G, at most a 3° view encroachment is encountered. There is already dense vegetation screening those views, such that staff feels that the impact on neighbors' view encroachment is very slight. Staff recommends approval of the variance. Issue V The neighbors to the south expressed a concern that they did not want the storage space above the existing garage to become living space because of the potential for its rental use and for loud parties. Applicant wishes to insulate and sheetrock the garage so that it can be heated for use as a hobby room and for his dogs to stay in. There is no plumbing apparent in the garage. Staff would note that if the garage is considered attached, we have no real concern whether or not it is finished off and heated. However, we would not be comfortable allowing plumbing in it under the proposed attachment method, nor could we allow it to be used as a separate guest apartment without a conditional use permit. Staff would recommend wording be placed in the resolution that will advise the applicant that the room over the garage cannot be used as a dwelling unit and cannot be plumbed unless it is attached to the main house via a heated corridor; and that future use as a guest apartment would require a conditional use permit as well as various modifications to the method of attachment. Summary of Staff Recommendation - Issue I - Planning Commission must determine whether it considers the structures attached or detached, and should address the standards for attachment for future reference. If they are detached. Planning Commission should determine whether there are sufficient hardships or unusual circumstances to warrant a structure-to-structure setback variance (4* proposed where 10' is required). Issue II - Staff recommends approval of a side setback variance, given that the garage is already existing at a substandard setback. Issue III - Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow 28.57% hardcover with the proposed tradeoff. Planning Commission may wish to consider additional tradeoffs to reduce hardcover even more so that there is a net decrease (1% = 220 s.f. +/-)• 1 in 75- icrete icover I over :d from artial iS that ^ view reening ' view nee. Zoning File #1139 April 29, 1987 Page 4 of 4 Issue IV - Staff recommnds approval of the average lakeshore setback variance, finding that the additional encroachment (3®) on existing view lines is relatively minor in light of the existing vegetation and actual views from the neighboring property. t- Y " Staff recommends that wording be placed in the resolution to be filed with the chain of title that will advise applicant of the limitations on use of the garage area as living space. 3t want Decause wishes 3e as a cent in ave no er, we oposed guest rording e room lumbed d that rmit as mm !ers the rds for mtission iinusua 1 ince (4* 5, given w ?8.57% wish to it there ■ uace Kec • u -r - v j / fv •» <i - .H ^Fee /^-/^\rd Receipt c^O:r^ii' M /A V J V * V Initials ^)- X./ . . ~u 1 HARDSHIP Describe undue Hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2.Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. ^^/j . / ?W-* ^ Date _ _ _ _Applicant's Signature / OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request Owner's Signature Date •/ Applicant must ha^^^ll submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. K i ik" ‘^41 «S4 i •*'' r-i •r1 «1i 4 Adjacent Property Oimers* Acknowledgement Form • • I (we) [print name(s) J DoAJtooQoK A»^‘ [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at T.^'us t^oA/v^'oobV also referred to as Land Use Application No. _ _ _. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am > (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of f the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. 4 .•fl Date ' /O <: //>/'2 Prc^erty Owner Date 111 y If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. <1 s of the and Use view of Lding & 1 (*»^) Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form • V^JlQJLi±ln£, ipTint name(s)J LTv of 'ZStr^ noA/lVOooy >fK [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Oo^u^or,r>Y ai^ also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, 1 (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that 1 (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. - p - Property Owner / y * . ^ X. ^ ^ "* " " ■Date ^11 4.U- have any information that may assist the Citv in the >- ■'t Vd, fY% • •O \ 0 © 0 Os V4 cr iH tr © d ■rV P > 4J X •H 0 C x> 0 © -^ r~“ 'y\ to no U < •H Cl V4 *1* X © © CQ w x: cu^ 0* r4 • 0 © Cl CP © © 'O > 4J © 0 c 5 0© 0 TJ 0 0 m rsi 0 rof-4 Cl Cl r4 © © < x: CU % >4 ft Cm 0 © 0 0^ Cl CPiH fO © ©+t © > 4J X. © 0 c InI 0 0 © --vn • cu^d 0 <•^ s • 0 Cl Cl N >=>'s. Cl © © 0cu x: cu —'1 ft » w 1 K tin gareaoneiu tn +1 \ ^ 44 U) 4-\ \A 44 tn +\ 0 44 tn W N •H 4-) V)r-t- cOX 0 P w 1-4 -H ft < w tO 1 lakeshorSETBACKZONEin r- 1 c 1 0 in (N > 1 IT •• 0 > 0 I in 1 1c ) iT • rs 500-1000(tj • >i<^ 5 O XI «tj 0) C c •a o >1 o •iM 14 r^ W Oj 4J «Q -iH *r4 - O 4J H3 0) -H iH T3 ^ 44 3 t3 (DO T3 *0 (D 'O o x: V4 44 0 4-) d) O *44 > U >1 o O P XI o tJi OB *0 d CQIV4 4-> OB d o 3 c x: O O *H 44 *H tr > )4 C (U V4 X: 4J M CD tn n 'O tn (1) 0 *H CD ^ X P 4J •«4 p rH 0 TJ '-t 0 u C ^ 1 c •H C •H >1^0 © JD 0) (D 4^ U >1 o ro d C r4 X > •'^ D< (D I O •H CO E 4J 4-> 0 (D © •H c ^ >4 C 2 oE N 4J 4J O d c c M o C O 4J >4 cd d C M 'H XJ © 3 <i4j e o ^ 0 4J C C c W M O -H •H d U 4J >1 a r-J J4 C © © 3 0 d O © ^ 44 0 E }-4 D^’H V4 P o c c 44 -H •> •• C 0 W O «H © ^ N «H W 4J c d O E © V4 cu >, p x: © o XI r4 4J C J4 o © cu Ql O 4J O O >4 c c d • © •H *H JJ 0 ^ coo V4 to o c o 0 0 u d *0 ^ O' -H V4 E d *0 >4 nJ 3 4J i-t d x: C c 3 > 0 o © u x: x; J4 to 4J © a 3 © o____ *0 © >1 c -H •H Xi -H no > 4j ^ d 'O •rt 4J d »0 44 XJ •H P O © 1 E x: I 3 44 4-1 W 1-4 0 ©wo cn © u d O' H « © .I cr> I I ^ d - _ .©'d4J© 4JdC 0 0 c © c c c C O > © O o O N © o ^ N N cu »4 c © c c *0 •i4 *4 f4 •H 0 O •H V4 Ct >4 (Q 44 © r4 © © 0 -H > o > > >4 O O > o o ri* © o 0 o uainO M no 'O 4J W >4 O' Cl V4 O d © 0 ^ © a: a: K ^0} ^ 014J D'>itT''d ©'0 __A ^ ft ^ % tn N U) © © x: TJ HO© p 4J -H 4J 4-) *H c © c •H C "H 5 "H 4J -H 4» © 4J W ^ w > to •H 4J -H *H -H X »4 X 0>©'O^OW'P 0) o w © >-^ •'’’rj 1:JOOO?0;HX© cuTJ cu o ^3 © x: o V4 O r-4 (1) 2 0 2rHX: QtW'Wri ^ M 'Cl ' J r. u D M t4 K,‘r'- LAKESHORE REGULATIONS AND HARDCOVER SEC. 10.22. REGULATIONS FOR "LR-IA", "LR-lA-l", "LR-lD "LR-IC" AND "LR-lC-1" ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Within any "LR-IA", "LR-lA-l", “LR-lB'’, "LR-IC", or "LR-lC-1" One Family Lakeshore Residential District the following r^'julations shall apply: Subd. 1. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The set back from the shoreline for lakeshore lots shall be at least 75 feet and no building may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent and nearby lots. Subd. 2. Lakeshore Hard Cover Regulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hard cover, temporary! or permanent structures. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hard cover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hard cover. Within 500 to 1,000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hard cover. Subd. 3. Tree Removal Regulations. No trees within 75 feet of the shoreline with the diameter of six (6) inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the Council. HARDCOVER LIMITATIONS 0-75' 75-250’ 250-500• 500-1000• Zone Zone Zone Zone 0% Hardcover allowed 25% Hardcover allowed 30% Hardcover allowed 35% Hardcover allowed Percentage of hardcover for each zone is calculated as follows; Area of hardcover in zone (sq. ft.) X 100 = Area of lot in zone (sg. ft.) Percentage of hardcover in zone NOTE; Measure setback distances perpendicular to the shoreline, not along the lot line. ROAl::. M ^r> S 10.03 suba. 12. crowding P-n=^l \uiiaing^^ accessory b^ e-rVctra^n!te%"ei."ll .ove^a witbln ten feet of the pr —————— ——— Subd. 13. °®'^®9®®^,'^S°®®®the^doots'^thir\y Veet or^ Street. Subd. 14. Yards and Open Spaces. A. Reduction ’ gions^so^as° to°m^ such space shall be reduced minimum required by the yard or other open ®P®°® existing yard or other °P®". ®P®°® ^e:?su"ng"u"Je%%\han^the it shall not be further reduced. B. Application to Ofy °'Jf„a°“®a^\^"%°bui?d?ng or required yard or °t*'®t °P®" ®P®^jg£y yard, other open spaces, or ^Inimu^ I'ot “fria iequ!rrmen« for any" other building or dwelling group# . suhd 15 Non-Encroachments. The following shall not oonsidere/w be encroachments on yard requirements: A. (^Chimneys, g®j£a|°“"”hanicaV*devlces' pilasters, lintels, °'-a®®®'|.?® provided they do not extend iGQulated. ^ B. Name, plate signs i^tgaing a^as^"or^"atdsy for lights for illuminating parkijia^^^ '^ ai^rect source bl light ^ ^ safety and security purposes, ©r adjacent residentialProm the public right-ot way oc «uj“feiy and src«rnrpurpo^pM||.„^^^^^ or "djacent TesTdential r? ioca\^ ^t“o*^Vi\h'i^n^ Mv/ f?e"t of thl front lot line., ^ ^ ^ -5-1 /9 feet in height, C. Fences which do not front lot line of lake fences not over six feet in j"/®thoro^^^^^^ terraces, steps, frontage lots which front on a structures, which do not uncove^red porches, stoops or level of the principal :x?lnl abovl the height of the ground t„o feet from building and extend to a distance any lot line. D. In side or F®®f °f ^more*than°twenty square depth of two feet " ®iath of three feet, fences and^ feet, fire escapes not to exce d gp^ open off- -> walls not to exceed a height ot Street parking. ORONO CC 256 (4-1-84) ^ Tos Frcxn: Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 29, 1987 Subject: #1140 Tom Berthiaume/Cherryl Kachenmeister, 3035 Casco Point Poad Variance - Public Hearing Application - Construct 2nd story bedroom/bath addition over portion of existing house with existing substandard setback. Zoning District - LR-IC, %-acre seweied List of Exhibits Exhibit A • Exhibit B • Exhibit C ■ Exhibit D • Exhibit E ' Pertinent Facts - Side Setback Application Plat Map Property Owners List/Neighbor Acknowledgements Survey Survey With Staff Sketch m Existing 7.1' Required 10' Variance 2.9' or 29% r. • *i ? ■ - .4 view encroachment caused by addition: None Discussion - The applicants propose to construct a 2nd story bedroom and bathroom addition over the existing garage, which is 7.1 feet from the side lot line. There will be no resultant encroachment on any lake views of either neighbor. There is no average setback encroachment. There is no additional hardcover proposed since the addition will be entirely above the existing garage. Note that applicant really has no expansion options except to go upward, since the lot is narrow and existing 75-250' hardcover appears to be in the range of 50% to 60% or higher. The neighboring house to the south is perhaps 40' from the applicants' residence, hence construction upward from the garage will pose no problems as far as structure-to-structure setback. In all respects, the proposed addition appears to be the most appropriate method to expand the house with no significant impact on neighboring properties nor on the lake itself. Staff Recommendation - • Staff recommends approval of the side setback variance to construct the second story addition as proposed. I rzfs-v .» •• •< '1 * \ ' 4 . 9 ff\baue Kcc’d /Fee_ _it J^TO. ^ th^'^ •.y • -A‘ .t ! i S r-** t .« ; Receipt_ _ _ _ Initials '^^a J CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address >30 S6 ^c/, /lJc / 'a^za.7zi. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) / / "7 Please check one - Is the property abstract or M_oo6( torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ^ _ _ Phone (work) S2^¥// AddressV31^55" City; Zip; ^^39/ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name ^sa/i/e,)4 Phone (work) Address;City;Zip; Date Property Acquired j//c (month/year) I (do) (^c__not)) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OP PROPE'.^TY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Alj; ^ 4/2-/C r Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 30^ OOP Describe request in detail; /^ec/n:/C>/^ (/ ^c/d*//by; e)z/s///7y _______mZZZZHIZZZZZIIZZZ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other ' ^ L 4 ■■ tf. . ■ * ¥ .’i lr i HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical^ difMculty ^sultd^g from strictiicixwoAixp wjL pjL Cl L. X v^ct ^ y^oUXuiriy enforcement of zoning regulations; /Jd/" _ _ _ /z) />;^r^dse d S/9U// /^/i/j<l u/Y/rj/// DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual prope^y conditi<^s preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; ^^/7 /of- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'f REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 9t2. 3. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list f:^m Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Ca. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. ^ 5. Plat Map. ( The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date /- f'// ■ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of^his. jeftquest. :/Owner's Signature Date /-/-/X Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please ma)ce arrange ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I 1 SJ/Z SEC. ZO, T U7, R. Z © 34 K IW.-* *. / y / 1 1 \1 > *-l * w,\\r^ I ( \N V''; ,r.. *MI4<6^7 \ '< -»* s ‘:a-.4../ /t>, -yV: '^''V S7;o / « .’ ?'J2 ‘x.>r . ** Vi4»'< ■ iv \; 109 0/\ / I, y--. //^.3 T?rfr 4>/^/4;yA> A^-/ X sfoiT'oAM-' *?'\ ‘^'A ^ -■' J1 ' . \>521 i,V,.S*'i 106 ■YtS ■Y#iic'/p- A^ • ‘ *!f:\/// 1^;' ^ \V/ y 175^/ A./-Ci'y«7€^ ,,i \ > \/. y •X,,v' 0^N!«v*>' O y 180 'N * * \■ •< 159 •'"ir ^ ?_vXq ;2 K 4* iit'< V \ (2i ■^vA cO'' •• *. \ \/ • iV g>i<r? \ ■ ^ vy ■' V 1 /^ io' 42 41 , cf^',c0 'trr-'r \'\\ 42 41 SB ', S7 \ / ^ ' i ».A^' 4Cs"'^Ii^.j,i') 1 f .(7> . A?^]* ^ \ A i f n p 4i{I s ‘1 f- /It ,y • I* .<r*' 1,^ .UCwV/W •» r-r*! /; • - -n u 1 (we) Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form 3CM<r CflSCQ pr KiD iddress ][print name{s)|[print ad have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Application No. _ _ also referred to as Land Use a a • I (we) understand that in executing this aclcncwledgement, I (we) am (are) not aslced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Date Date zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. • • ' •• •I * • » ^ II ! ^ tvievf of Iding & /7.\ r Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form t X ‘^rJ 1 -t- CViV of I (we) lme(s)l --------- 1 print addressF have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at TC also referred to as Land Use Application No. -- - -• , . • ' I („e) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ' ' Property/ Owner ^Date • • t Date 4- - fZ Property Owner If you have any “ur^oomment^ to tht Bu'i ^Sn^^nrSffice a\""lea?t" lo"da"ys*pr\\r to thi' scheduled meeting date. [ ) t ;! ' AVi« O CO o CW O r> Of fO — O• • • • • • > O -1 -1 o — 3 3^ r> ST a Vi o» • M n yr M* Ok ^ o -1 to Vi -** o o •— r* #0 o O* -1 r* 3 ^ *< S• r» O fP -» i-k 3 r* 3T a j 3 3 <0 Of «o Q c* r* 3 •-• <D . 3 1 U3 *- »« • * . 03 o 30 3 r» fO ^ «< <£3 3 O O c 3 O CX — 3 0^0 O 3 7> «, i/k O 3 r o X <p 3 -r 'O 3 »-• to C 3 < *< Ul to & 3 Ul iO '2^ :*S^ rk k-'••• a l-k —i 3 Or *< ly IP 3 3 3”O O*o •fP O r-k 3 to 3 O CP 3 to O 3 CD c 30 r-k -3 0$X 3 o Or to ••o 3 a;3 r-k to fp 3 3 Or CD n fP Of 3 m » o 3 O» o •3 3 •M» 3 iO Of 3 fP 3 P to w »r»-i fP 3 zr X 3 t<O M a •••Or Or » X IP 3 r>to fP O o•3 rk 3 to i/1 >3 to rk •O •O rk 3 c 3 30 C 3* rp «P 3 «p to < O 'P 1/1 *< O Of Of rk 7T -- rp o 3 X O 3 31 3 • rp Of— o •-> 3 yr 3 O. c • Ot 3 to c 3 < fP •< — Qi 3. 3 - Ol 3 to lO »p Ok to *-► fp ^ X 3 O — fp ^ X> r* n to O r* C 3 3 3 3 O* < rp 3 3 *< o O# O 3 fP cr »p 3 rp O 3 O -H to » rk 3 «3 rr r- ^ o# Of rv m k/i Ol O O eu z» X ^ ^ O to — Q. ^ 2-♦» 3- 3 3 > C O to U3 • ^ 3 rO Ip 3 CL » O# rp O 3 1/1 VO 3 O — ^ -1 iO O fp — r-k O tT fP 3 Ip 3 3 IP 3 n fp CT <P Ip 3 3 fP 3 to O c 3 < fp 1/1 fp 300 O 3 V< uQ Qi 3 3 fP 3 yj 3 to fP C t/i 3 #P < 3 fp r- 3 »< 3 rk — ac — o o • 3 CD fP (O .,5^5. 1 o•iiK fii.' :; .» 4 I 1 ;vl ^:T5ra [•i#i#icrir«i r«r:v«] r«rx«i r«it¥«i •)tT«l mfT«i ^x#r#i r" [•v«rc:] I •! it«l •l«lcf I ■ V* a •] •K?T»r«i • Miiiriiir# V ■ I n r ft t * ^'1 i| t»fi* * ».» r"; f /.«IK; .;«tl V * Iv.Iv 1 uaue Koc-u i /5Z)^v Receipt-^i^ lnitiars c;tt/,^as^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) After-tho^pa^r'^v change from original application)After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address /955 Fagarness Point Road, Wayzata, MN 5539/ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) I8n723i400t0 Please check one - Is the property xx abstract or _ _ torrens? application if not included on required survey, applicant Name Phone (home) 941 6303 Karltnn G&mple>r S, Mftrift fi/og Phone (work) 372 6227/ 893 0260 Address; Dorset Lane ___________ City: Prairie MN zip. 55344 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Ronnkvist Phone (home) 471 79/0____ ___ Phone (work) 544 4281 Address: 4484 west Arm Road City; Spring Park, MN . Date Property Acquired April 1979 (month/year) __ _v^d^not^yalso own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District R-1 Present Use of Property vacant/Residentiai Residential Other (specify). ' DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 125.000 Describe request in detail: see attached VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( xx Fron*- Lakeshore Other Side Rear) I 8/:x 'Y' f HARDSHIP DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ^Id^Requirement^f preventing compliance with Zoning REQUIRED SUBMITTALS !• Completed Application Form Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain 348-3271? Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of i-h^ names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application PlVafte Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application'ircorapleter" Zoning Official's Signature ^ate APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that knlwledge!‘"^‘"°" supplied is true and corr'S^ct to the best of“h?s/hlr Applicant's Signature - - -. Date V- /C ^ g 7 OWNERS SIGNATURE Owner' s Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date submittals into the City offices 25 days before”the Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are^ held on the third Monday of each nonth. Applicants must be present at all scheduled Planning Commission and cISLi 1 f Ldf ff In unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arranop authorized agent attend in your place and toBuilding & zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. M.il f* /71 • » I : V. • -r r Details of Construction:' i, U 11 The current garage and shed are situated too close to the lot line and street with today's building code. To remove these structures and build a "tuck under" adds immeasureably to the look of the property for ourselves and our neighbors. It also conforms to the safety requirement with no further need to back out of the garage onto the street. We are proposing a double width garage. It is also our plan to build a 1st level story on top of this "tuck under." On the lake side of the home, we are requesting a wood deck which will enable us to really utilize the lake views. This wood decking will allow for seepage thru the structure into a sand base. We do not intend to impede in any way the absorbtion of water into the land. Our current building plan is for a second story on the south side of the home. Due to the fact that a portion of the current structure falls within the first zone, a request for variance is being requested. Total cost figures will determine the final decision here. In granting our request, the overall hardcover on this property will be reduced by 185 square feet. This home will be our permanent residence. We are looking forward to our move and the enjoyment of Lake Minnetonka and the neighborhood. Your consideration of our request is appreciated. Sincerely, Karlton F. Gempler Maria S. Ives ’■*** ■*“■*■ r#vii i»KlM*oi [•w»] [•Kl r«iE«j r»yi r#w»iMii LiiMiKil r*w« r#K« wm rJ Hardcover Review - 1955 Fagerness Point Road Total Lot Area = 14,025 square feet = 0.32 acre 0 _ 75- setback zone: Area - 5625 square feet (12 X 48.3) + (4.1 x 14.6) = 640 square feet concrete steps (4.7 x 6) t (5.5 x 5.3) = 60 square feet Lakeshore stairs (2.5 x 30') = ’5 square feet = 25 square feetFlagstone (2 x 12.5) 800 square teet =» jtf,2.‘Vo 0 _ 75 proposed hardcover t House portion Concrete steps (4.7 Lakeshore stairs Flagstone Deck 35' X 10' X 6) 640 square feet 30 square feet 75 square feet 25 square feet 350 square feet 1120 square feet =» 19.9% 75’ - 250' setback zone;area - 8400 square feet Hou^ portion (48.3 x 12) + (28.1 x Steps (5.1 X 5.2) + (5x5) Concrete patio (17 x 13) Shed (10.6 X 10.8) Detached garage (22.1 x 20.1)^ Concrete garage apron (22 x 2^ Blacktop & gravel (22 x 16.5) + Flagstone walks (2 x 68) + (3 J 23) (3 X 59) + (3 X 21) + (2 X 25) 6) = 750 square = 51 square = 221 square = 114 square s 444 square = 44 square feet feet feet feet feet feet s 1050 square feet s 495 square feet 3169 square reet or 37.7% proposed 75 - 250', hardcover House portion Addition - 1 story w/tuckunder (22 X 31) , ^ Driveway (8 x 35) + (10 x 10) (17.5 X 20) + (10 X 16.5) + (8 X 12) + (8 X 3/2) Patio (13 X 17) Sidewalk = 750 square feet = 682 square feet a 1000 square feet as drawn a 221 square feet a 75 square feet 2728 square feet or 32.5% Net decrease of 5.2% or 441 square feet in IS - 250 Net increase of 5.7% or 320 square feet in 0 - Vb nuprall net decrease of 121 square feet on property 1 UKH iwi 1 ■ I 'i^amammm Subject To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Commission Members ^ y Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator April 29, 1987 #1109 Curtis L. Johnson, 2024 Shadywood Road - Variances - Request for Additional R^vlL consideVat^onTo'h “s'’|roposed^ additional fence extending ll'ong the^SeTTorSfr^n^ifhloTtf thf s''o^’h.^°"^" your consideration. Providing photos of the property for your revilwf^^"®^ exhibits of 4/14/87 are attached for [•\^zlm^9lzMm9] •JOII m'-i ■ V ■^ v-l ■' i'^^'. '- ‘v'SJ-. • TVlTil li ' ^ -: 4 mtT«l «n^ ^rcKii ^•¥•1 rsTtH*] additional land is available ana tni reconunends approval. Xo ciAi ffl average mndation ide with ch would nance 58% 60% 6.8% 5.8% (30%) (30%) side deck B and not going to lot. He lOUses, as se during rincipa 1 Since no e. staff Zoning File #1109 April 14 1987 Page 2 of 2 II. 75-250' Hardcover: Applicant proposes house and deck plus existing sidewalk and garage with a total of about 30.8% hardcover. Staff would suggest this is very consistent with previus approvales in the neighborhood, and would also suggest that the existing garage location is unsafe and staff would envision the applicant or a future owner requesting to construct a new garage someday. Presuming a future 24'x20' garage and 30'xl6' driveway, future hardcover on the lot would have to be as high as 39% in the 75-250' zone in order to provide a safe garage and driveway apron. IV. Side Setbacks: Centering the house on the lot, with 7' side setbacks on either side, leaves about 10' between 2024 and 2032, and about 17' between 2024 and 2016. (2024 will be centered on its own lot but visually will be offset to one side even more than it is now — existing house-to-house setbacks are 12' left, 15' right . . .} We recommend centering the houes on the lot so that access around both sides of the house is feasible, and to accommodate drainage, utilities, etc., etc. V. Average Lakeshore Setbacks: Applicant requests that in determining the average setback line, consideration be given to the fact that the neighbor's deck at 2032 Shadywood Road has a 14' long fence, 6' effective height above ground, 90% opaque, sticking out lakeward from the house, plus a second—story deck above it. Given the location of the 75' setback line (and the tendency for houses near it to extend decks over it) staff would recommend that the average setback required for the relocated house structure be no further lakeward than the average house setback line shown on Exhibit F, (about 1^' behind 2032, about 1%' in front of 2016) and that the average deck setback should be as shown. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the lor area and lot vridth variances, finding no additional land available and that there is an existing house on the property. Staff recommends that the hardcover variances as proposed (0-75' hardcover = 6.8%, 75-250' = 30.8%) be approved, finding that those percentages are consistent with previous approvals in the area. Staff recommends that the side setbacks for 7' either ride be approved, finding that this is a better situation than the •;.isting setbacks. Staff recommends that no variances be granted to tto average lakeshore setback for the house structure and that the required verage house structure setback be as shown on Exhibit F. Staff recommends that the second story deck extending eastward from the house is allowed up to the average setback line as shown on Exhibit F, subject to a maximum opaqueness of, say 25% (standard railing would be about 20% opaque, figuring 1^5" posts- with o- maximum openings). ?S) !r^ O ^ /OU U 9 Date Kec'd , 'c^y 6- ^') Fee t*. ir.v ..'* - .’^ . Receipt_j2£3^ 5>i^>v Initials I . > '^Ovv. *r/—•r 1 no^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ____2024 Shadywood Road, Orono, MN 55391 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 17-117-23-31-0011 Please check one - Is the property XX abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Curtis L. Johnson and Pamela J. Willette Phone (home) 471-8897 472-4664 Phone (work) 544-6699 ^cre^si P.O. Box 246 City; Spring Park Zip:55384 jWNBR (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Same as above Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired 06/16/86 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT DSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property / Single Family Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ unknown at this time Describe request in detail; Add second story to house, new roof on house and garage, new siding and paint on house and garage, deck on front of house VARIAfXES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width XX Hardcover Setback Variances (Front XX Side Rear) Other ; f a V « . • mm T* t HARDSHIP enllrce^enfol time ■4 s : h i DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS CodrRequlrementsf‘'Tus!^f°"i^l^°”^ compliance with Zoning ■ 12.3 feet fro„ lot H~° on NE side --ana REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form thi^\“ frora^He^nepin county®<y°" '=®" °*>tain 34C-3271). ^ Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center *• sss’i; .ir.*ivVs;.’:rsz’?j:;".f.%vr'""" “ •■"'»' “• 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner drr^ ^.u • remember that your variance aoDlicai-irm application. Please information has not been includedf^ ^ complete if the above Certification by Zoning Department that VarlancrArpIicItion Zoning Official's Signature is complete. Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE reque%\'’e“lfy\he®?oning^llm®inl^^^ information required or unusual expenses incurred in review of°this®anDll<'nt’- fees and/or the information supplied is trn^ application, and certifies thatknowledge. ^uppi^a correct to the beet of his/her Applicant's Signature _____ Date January 22, 1987 OWNERS SIGNATURE f/ authorizes i^e^^onable°entry ^ontc to this application and further tion and verlfioation/a^lhil!^S^!•.^'"!!^®''® purposes of investiga- Owner * s 1987_______signature _______January 2.. Plaiiing%o™ission Meeting'"^’'pi^in^°co'’® '^'^?^ offices 25 days before the third Monday of each month' ADoircaL, ^re held on the review meetings of the piannlna rom» ® Present at all scheduled applicant is unable to attend a Council, and, if an ments to have an authorized ao«nt ««•? to please make arrange- Building S zoning Office of this change "pri\r "'to® the^meetlng. • # I (we) Owwer of ^0'6X Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form Ror JPiL.b Pa n=ts of 3hi>J\AAJjor/ [print name(s) ] . [^rint address] ^ have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. //d)9 • I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgementr I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. - ^<1. Jj R Property Owner Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. I (we)print address Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Porm iprint nameCsll have reviewed the plans for the proposed in.prove.ent or proposed use of the property located at Application NOe , u.a...t.n* «“« 1" «•=«*"> «“• " .. «.=..<• “• ...... - «. c.., .... . .... .. • , <-hat the proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that the propo requires Council approval. ty Owner Pr/^erty owner a/^/p: Date If you have any y|ui ’'commenw‘to th| "zSn^“ng“o«i- a"riea?t ‘t°oVys prior to the scheduled meeting date. vjr;>fcg.i To: Subject Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members *^°r’ission Chairman Kelley CltC Commission Members ^Cxty Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator February 10, 1987 ^aiuncer^lubii^HSIring"”"" Shadywood Road - are submitted to postpone variance review until revised plans would be unable^to^proceed staff to advise that he thtrih^ residence because the f^ndation ^Ja^s addition to the comniol''’® time to center the Str,f®r "'"'Stable, staff noted foundation was to be installf^ri^f^^^^® property if a The applicant also advised that L wichii the enclosed survey^! ?el^^^? <3esignating^the avj ”rage s^e^tbrck^l • survey would have to be lakAch^®^ structure. Mr. Johnston has setbacks for thelakeshore second story deck nf^Jl ° discussed a desire for a applicant was advised that «3uoh a eiy 12 feet in width The* lakeshore setback ^ have to also meet the averagi Note for Review, Consideration, C review of the Schai*i^application""it^"/^ conclusions resulting from the variance applications when \ second of staff to require portion of a structure that is ‘=® installed over^th^t “““If.®!®® require variances !f an alditio" ’^ required yard area. sta?fexisting s -.bstandard setback line Mot-a an extension along an be required if a prooertv had ai* a that a variance review would r»ne encroachment of the strifcture into^? received variance approval for the approval was not conditioneron eh. t V^rd area, and, if, that horizontal expansion. specific prohibition of vertical or Planning Commission Action: the until •J • H 11 lent ip rr: HARDCOVER REVIEW 2024 Shadywood Road - Zoning Pile #1109 0-75' - Area = 2,850 s.f. Existing: Shed + Steps 16.25 x 12 = 195 s.f. or 6.8%+/’ No Change Proposed 75-250' - Area = 6,300 s.f.■•‘1 Existing:House Garage Concrete Walks Driveway 833 s.f. 390 s.f. 490 s.f. +/' 40 s.f. 1,753 s.f. = 27.8% Proposed:House + Deck 24.5 x 49 Garage Driveway Concrete Walks (3x80)+(3x3)+(4xl6) 1,200 s.f. 390 s.f. 40 s.f. 313 s.f. 1,943 s.f. = 30.8% jA-S-rCt- d.'O-'C'^ i?/ U j Lthfl£A^ M-cJ^ JUjLtZoicL<i-> . :{c:^3^ 4^ c^IjO f le> l_ / /i©fe '* rmm » *. / ,kii ,>,V. J ■•. ^ ^i:,. . ■.^; ><r‘ '515 F'Jhn m. ■ i '^ ^ \ ^im. • /y , V !//: ■ I-P>'J ♦ . I 1 / "•. ^ -V ,> ' . j -'.f; / !»•;•' /•- / liiMi»® .'1 Vf -. •*t ''.'V , -\j m.u m ^ ^ f $ —‘ f\ • i' .. ■' i' 'N? I ^ ’ *-'v' / -v''V^ ■ '% 'Ki •■ . «‘ V ■ }•.'J it; -' V,-------- -- - \, .,4;.;-i ‘ti: 'l;.' pti \ I ii .X ^ ^ E i:^^-4# 11 V*' . .\vpni ?M i •• .• -' f»-n- u>‘-* II J3S I T'•'IB ' -^i.lilIL Sis '1 3g^: 'sc-rw :’F^ J ■■^] v ‘., ’■' X r - V \ ' 7 ^ ■' — Ik* # » ’ * ■' 3 *.si« r».'■ • ■• ' -K -s •. .-..■■5‘.'.'w*"’i' ii