Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-20-1987 Planning Packet
PLANNING CX)MMISSION MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1987 7:00 P.M. 1275 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - COUNCIL CHAMBERS f, COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDANCE - William Sime, Jr. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.7:30 p.m.#1127 •C M 7;45 p.m.#1128 3,8:15 p.m.#1133 4.8:30 p.m.#1136 Richard E. Brown, 1245/1295 Sixth Avenue North Subdivision - Class I f rww - - -- - - - -J- - - - - - - - ^ Preliminary Subdivision - Class III Subdivision - Class I Subdivision - Class II ACTION ITEMS 5. #1103 Howard Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit - Second Review 6.#1109 Curtis L. Johnson, 2024 Shadywood Road - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing 7.#1115/1116 Paul Boyke, 795 North Ferndale Road - ^ ^ . „ Vacation and Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing 8. #1119 W. Duncan MacMillan, 1700 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit - Second Review 9. #1124 Jim & Ruthanne Lange, 4160 Forest Lake Drive Variance - Public Hearing 10. #1125 Charles B. Reid, 1400 Baldur Park Road Variances - Public Hearing 11.#1126 Robert Gehrman, 4300 Sixth Avenue North Variances * Public Hearing 12. #1129 Todd Waters, 3061 Casco Point Road - Variances Public Hearing 13. #1130 Ken & Renee Eggert, 1371 Rest Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing #1131 Guenther Noelting, 1060 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing #1132 Douglas Bumgardner, 3800 West Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Permit - Public Bearing ■ I i PLANNING OOMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1987 7:00 P.M. 16.#1134 17.#1135 00•#1137 Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Variances - Public Hearing ADDITIONAL ITEMS 19. Planning Cornmission approval of March 16, 1987 minvtes 20. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the May 11, 1987 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT i \ V J w,.-> • -v .1 i p.c. PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE V /7 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. fjjLL 5 ✓ 2 . C f^(f /VC'O /k (» l/2> 3.t/ < -j // ^ > y p?^ {^^'hy^.t _/y'C3 :» 5. ^ r-c/jL 's,n o.^/3.oi^K // -3 <r~ // 37 Pr CT^r. A'l-p y / ( 1%'-- UZ^HOl^ Py^jL i4 f ^ /J ''/^5'Jr ^LUjiJ A./ft I'fS //fs4>'n k 2. Pm/}1( MJ/yiJ '2/^0 Ai/c’ //'^r iu-r{i -y • 7/25^ k - W^'Vvv--.^ ^ S ^ - 0 w' r-T^ )i i / L M 3^ 7 (I W ^ .avP >7.....__....... 7. f/^ //c y 001frj'y. p fkfi^Ln i$<aoim ^ffi-^f \ i I 11 PUBLIC ATTENDAMrp CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE ^/%c/^ y PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) ; 'V TUr.-t »».PTMGS FOR THE OROMO PIAHHIRG COMMISSIOH R SCHEDOLB OP MEETINGS FOR (May through September 1987)(May tnrougn ... planning AS of way- llfect providing "®®nq" Co"i^\''sVion° wm „vie« of “fi/st^V'ondsy of mon^ ®f^Vhe schedule ^eguTa^ml^thly deadline S?es informat ana/^- - - - - incomp lejte^ Roofing Pate May 4, 1987 May 18y 1987 June If 1987 June 15f 1987 July 6, 1987 July 20» 1987 August 3» 1987 August 17f 1987 September 8i 1987 September 21f 1987 nate for__Fiiiaa -A^il 10, April 24# 1987 May 8, 1987 May 22, 1987 June 12, 1987 June 26, 1987 July 10 f 1^®^ July 24, 1987 August 14, 1987 August 28, 1987 State laws establisn rne y * To: Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator March 27, 1987 Subject: #1111 Steve Pauly, 3980 Dahl Road - Variance - Information Mr. Pauly has submitted plans to construct a totally new residence meeting the required 75' setback and requiring no variances. He will be living in the existing house during construction, removing it when the new home is complete, as allowed per Section 10.03, Subdivision 7 as revised by Ordinance #24, 2nd Series on 7/14/86. He will also be removing the drive way and gravel hardcover in the 0-75' zone. Staff has determined that no further review of the application by Planning Commission is necessary. TO: Date: Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 15, 1987 Subject: #1127 Richard E. Brown/Richard Erickson, 1245-1295 Sixth Avenue North — Preliminary Subdivision - Lot Line Rearrangement — Public Hearing Application - Lot line rearrangement, property trade to accommodate proposed tennis court at 1245 Sixth Avenue North. Zoning District - LR-lA, 2-acre unsewered, lakeshore List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Pertinent Facts: Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey With Proposed Dividing Line Staff Sketch and Notes Regarding Location and Conditions of Septic System, 1295 Sixth Avenue North Lot size, 1245 Sixth (Brown): 5.7 acres +/- dry - Lot size, 1295 Sixth (Erickson): 9.5 acres +/- dry - Proposed tradeoff; 0.15 acres for 0.15 acres (see survey) - The site of the proposed tennis court is perhaps the only flat site on (partially on) the Brown property large enough for a tennis court. Discussion: In concept, staff has no problem with the proposed tradeoff of land to accommodate the tennis court. We would not allow such an accessory structure to be built over the lot line, even if there was an easement granted between the owners, hence the lot line rearrangement is the proper approach. On 4/15/87 during staff review of the proposal on the site, it was noted that the existing septic system at 1295 Sixth is likely near but probably not over the new lot line as proposed, just west of the tennis court. Also to be noted is a catch basin adjacent to that drainfield area which apparently flows into a tile or pipe that will likely be under the tennis court and leads toward the north, discharging via a culvert north of the Erickson driveway. •Iwl WFVil A[ii>'>[^ir»Fr •MTira iitr# this rging ving ther !kson stem and, lelp bout and rCITY OF ORONO 5 •f,■I r> 1 /Date Roc'd 3-n Tlr _____Fee Rec'dSUBDIVISION application FORM APPLICANT Name /\ ./'.p i Mailing Address /? S'* —:PROPERTY Name \\ >C II/] i(n /- 1 OWNER - - Telephone 7 S T~?Ri ! ') t'tl utTe 0^u*■' AL/t ^<3 Mailing Address / > V',' L ‘c< n'r^/ /''D (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION (^12-*^'S' SixjrH Al;|;^JUE f^orTI^ Street Address ( c ,, ni'j k^c n'O 0‘ Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) %&!f f:z Cfl! Description to be attached to application existing land USB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) _ / Present Zoning District Lf< - / PROPOSAL y -as* ^ mm mm mm tm mm mm mm mm mm mm _ Division for Tax Purposes _ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use; (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Landl Residential Other (specify) (OVER) r ■ minimum material NECESSAR-i FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION1. Application Completed2. Preli.*'inary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. obtainerffom^the^KeJ^^^ County De^aVti^^^ A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sitea-:>nvelopes (#10) pre-addtessed to each of the names on the above list with no reL'urn address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. ^ . Zoning Officials Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __—- - - —-- - - - - -- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. / 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements# Covenants# etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature_ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -— FEES $150.00Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $300.00 plus 20.00/lot $150.00* coimtission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. 1^ 1 I • llyfrUDi^ Applicant's Elg Owner's sianat^a.t=-r j f ^ -- - - - - - - - - - -- u^hVid^s: the third Monday of each month. « m >- K t § CSJo o Z o ly lU M »S;I Xli «0 lA ro M I CO 5^ 0H U I M ^ ft CSJ m uj M ft o Ui ft O ft |8 5S M C\J ft ^ o z o Ui it < o. SE*= • ►‘i **r"i sto s i UJ ^35u.S!S! iCi M <Ni ^ O ft ft •>« UI U SI z 9( M M lilies S S E E S e2si ft s sth r s O Z H O UJ < >- V *"§65121^5CO M ** 5( 10 CO 10 UI I 55§§ CSI UI O O i^ u u in *-t «j ^ $ o 2 2 ^ S inoo o m ft H UJ Ui Kl M I Ui ft SiS CO «• I M C>l in in in 3 tu UI^S| M s8s?8* UIlO to ii 5 JCU M 1^ B o in o S^ESS i X t- K 0 M >• V I»i4 ft «• to 0^ ^ m < ^ o o 2u>m :s§ ssiiS ;s«^* m I IS ( *a4rr . ‘V t) inro UI in o o o oo i :i 3 S9 N f C SIS:E Ui 10 CO < Ui - ^8 S a rvT h2-:^ < UI Ui 14 UI ft t;s 2^ O M UI to <o o ^ z m CL O ^Pi I- lO u ft Ui“ it! E t UI tt. lu M ft O O I ( .i c- . 1 I f ( ( EXHIBIT E #1127 4-15-87 1 - SEPTIC TANK - Tank is very deep, has a precast cover with open chamber and cast iron MH cover at surface Jk 2 - "AERATOR" TANK - Probably "Coolbroth" system; Same as tank 1, but baffle plate in the middle 3 - AERATION ELECTRICAL BOX - It turns out that there is no the box. lust wires and a receptacle. Presume that compressor aeration system was removed some years ago and is currently not in u.'^e, hence tan is functioning as a septic tank. 4 - 4" PVC CtBAHOOT, at an angle with plumb, presume it leads to distribution box - CATCH BASIN- Iron grate, 2' diam rock-lined basin about 4' deep, has an L;iet^!p“* 6-8- dTam Heading to N-NE, about 6- above bottom, current water level"4 “ .above bottom (below outlet P^P® ^ like sewage, but is located directly adjacent to drainfield area. nr.infi.ld area aooears to be trenches or a bed perhaps 75'-100' long, an «ea Iblut 30'-4o!^ wide, adjacent to but probably not encroaching upon proposed lot line as shown on sketch. 6 - AN ADDITIONAL CATCH BASIN- did not open 7 - 12" CULVERT OUTLET- Inspector John Petran felt this was suspect Le-.“d o? sewage slightij, h'Ld a sample of discharge water tested results wete inronclusive (Fall *86) (770 Fecal Colif. Colonies Per lOOML) Exhibit E #1127 April 15, 1987 Page 2 of 2 (6rand®*cu"lvlrt ’’“(7is connected by a tile to catch basin existfnci opinion that during wet seasons, the existing drainfield serving 1295 Sixth Avenue N. has a high ootential to cuvlert eventually outlet to\hl surface at ’flK. % ' * ^ I n ll. i; 4i V- A,.»nen= ..t* 7>.k5 ;,x.,8'k AASIAti <*,U ^,oc*»vO **^ N w% K '-□ci itie 1 that creates 4 more suitable parcels, three of which have a potential for further development. Staff suggested and applicant proposes a "phased" road development scheme that requires a short length of private road be constructed to serve this initial division, leaving a road Outlot as access for future development of the rear parcels, with road extension to be constructed at such time future development occurs. ISSUES/CONCERNS/COMMENTS I. Road Access Location. The private road is proposed to enter Old Crystal Bay Road at the location of the existing driveway. The Hennepin County Highway Department has not commented as of this wilting, but the City Engineer has commented that this access location does not appear to have the sight distance required due to elevation of the County Road where Farview enters, just to the north. The applicant is hoping to use the existing roadway location both to preserve the 2 acre minimum area of Lot 1 Block 1 and to maintain a woods buffer between their road and the Blair residence at 790 Old Crystal Bay Road. City engineer Glenn Cook suggested that one alternative might be for applicant to request Hennepin County to lower the "hump" in Old Crystal Bay Road, perhaps with some sharing of the cost . . . II. Private Road. A.) Staging. The proposal is to construct a private road and cul-de-sac on Outlot A initially, to serve the existing residence and Lots 1 and 2 Block 1. Under the surveyor's proposal, only Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 front on the cul-de-sac, leaving Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2 to share a private driveway via Outlot B. Staff would prefer to see that first cul-de-sac abutting Lot 1 Block 2, moving about 100' to the east. We would recommend that if any one of the three 4-plus acre lots is further divided, the private road would have to be extended. If Lot 2 Block 2 is developed into two or three lots, the road would have to be extended the entire length. If Lot 2 Block 1 or Lot 1 Block 2 do a split prior to the subdivision of Lot 2 Block 2, perhaps only a partial construction of road Outlot B would be appropriate with a "temporary" cul-de-sac. These temporary cul- de-sacs might be shown as road and utility easements rather than platted cul-de-sacs, and the entire road be platted as a single outlot. B.) Length. Note that at full development, the private cul-de- sac road would be about 1100' in length, or about 100' more than the standard maximum. However, a review of contemporary subdivisions in unsewered areas indicated many cul-de-sac roads of that length have been approved: Tanglewood - 1500', White Oak Circle - 1400', Abingdon Glen - 1600', Devin Lane -1250', French Lake Road - 1350', West Farm Road - 1200', Hunt Farm Road - 1500', Orono Oaks - 1750' to name but a few. C.) Future Connections. City Engineer Glenn Cook suggested that a corridor for a future connection to the north via Dennis mA Kumlin's plat of Foxwood should be at least considered. This could be accomplished by taking a 25' strip either side of the line b^ween the two plats. This would not be a problem for Lot 2 Block 1 of Ranie Anderson plat, but would cause lot area Kumlin, who is coming in for final plat approvalShortly. III. Septic Concerns. We have not received septic testing reports for any of the properties. Lot 2 Block 1 was apparently tested last fall, given the test hole locations shown on the survey. We wi 11 require testing on Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 and also for an alternate site for the existing house. Lot 2 Block 2 will testing at this time because it exceeds 5 acres dry buildable and is likely to be further subdivided in the future. IV. Wetlands. Conservation and Flowage easements will be required over the two major wetlands on the property. We would also recommend consideration of requiring a Conservation and Flowage easement over the lew area along the northwest end of Lot 2 Block 2. V. Drainage. The drainage easement shown in Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 is appropriate. The drainage and utility easement along the east line of Out lot C should be widened to 20' and 10 respectively. All outside permiter lot line drainage and utility easements should be expanded to 10' in width. VI. Outlot C. Must remain under ownership of the Homeowners Association as an unbuildable Outlot, may be sold only for combination with neighbor to the immediate south (740 Old Crystal Bay Road) or maybe should be made a part of Lot 1 Block 2. . . the point is to avoid it becoming somebody's idea of a building site. ^ STAFF RECOMMENDATION A. Issues needing more input before final decisions and recommendations can be made: 1. ) County Road access location 2. ) Septic testing B. Issues for Planning Commission to address on a conceptual basis for this proposal: 1. ) "Staging** of road development 2. ) Whether or not a corridor for future access to the north is appropriate 3. ) Consideration whether low land northeast of existing house should be a designated wetland to be consistent with other projects, given that it's a pothole (surveyor: which way does it flow? what are its boundaries?); also considering the north end of that .. r If ■ lowland will have future road and oul-de-sac over it. . B^rd"™rive i-ues in additional information re: *^®ptic ^^hen table until are received. - ptic and County Road access location 'i;. 'M-m fc-'l m' r% ■■■>1 ■<-?• ■ 1j IWWP ■ ■■■:¥- 0^4^ ■ i ^■1 I --«. m!wmm^mWFm; -S MM •’tSv ‘ml ■ -i.*-- 1 • v-- 4 - - iiiiiMiii .......... _______ _____ __. , % GT.: y'’! tr.P'tr.r7\:i:ty of or^ijp “’■fr •cf - :•? (^- lir » 'i'p-K-i u« « l i : ■n .t'- i#r o Date Rec'd 3-'I€''^7 By Fee Rec’d ^7?^. . SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM APPLICANT Name ^ - — - - — ' ' '— ■ ■/iV7 // f-' A/^/f^Telephone ^ 7-?? PROPERTY Name OWNER Mailing Address _ w y.'T<r' /^/yTy-^^c ■//^S'c.^j, L 'Z"’Telephone Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address i <2 .*2_ _ Property Identification No, (P. I. D. ),4^ -// 7~~ 2 ^Cl -CCC 4di^C Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels _ Development Size 2.0- ± JzZ. ■y,// Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ / Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes •K Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size:Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) (OVER) 1-^ / JL L material necessary for comd.,.™Application Completed2. Preliminary Plat information on Cert.-f 3 . Certificate of Survey • Certified Pronp»ri-Tr n,_ _... ^3. Certified ^xiicate of Survey. I ^ «“ouJ Government- -- '"'^w^iiijiienx: above list Pro-addressed to each of the names on the ificat^r.n K.. .Certification by Zon • * complete. ^ Department that Prelimi* Zoning Officials Signature Application is Date __ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1- Payn.ent of fees (par. f APP^CATION rees (park fees, fiUng fee, newer an,i . 2- Signed certificate of s .rvev or assessments) 3- Title opinion. 4- Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and acceotaM r ification __ _ _ _ 5. that P.nal Plat ApplLtlon is complete - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - --- -^- -- - - Date _ _ _ PEES Sketch Plan Review (class I, n * m, - <=3ass I s II Subdivisions, — Preliminary Review (Class III and $150.00 i \r<\i 1 Kl ^ ^ egc Km >e o <SI 10 •-4 > K.C M ro >- lO S(D ’ 9 ^ O CO ^ M <!. i UJ ^5 $ o < CO H M CO UIUJ5 >- ooo s 9f% CM K H !3 X o ^K> »i lO jcin to V Si o 3"" R lU ^ H-»=a U CM ^ O O CO n q U4 ^>- s Qc < M5 I III3 i 13s L •m- ..LLft itif*:%r^[1 3 • 1 i rU .5 * -♦'fI?1» sS (0 S Kl CM C" c *a H1 IM DC >• M 2 O O D ^O' o CK o o 5 H •M ejo O CO O a CM o CM Kl CM I K M 2 ^ O UJ I Ifi H UJ o ^ o •> ICO tt COo inUJ HiM X < H CO 5 X S 10 V & >- lO &Ol#%o WPo W •* ^o < < ^ •Ml Kl ^ DJ ^ •M 10 »0 Kl CM 1 ile« fw ^ •• in OC <10•o u r z 1-CM < < 401 q r r >-*N- »4I m4 J fefei*®®Sq ^ o ^ -M Q IE 7 u u p <1^ •Jh* O to < < O < r J tt tt Kt oc»<^io>-H M K» eg u u lo 8 A o U -i c j < ^ O U O CO X c (c . % /I UJ li. It* Mft o o ii. ((c . V' : .iJiil't j. ; I PF! V a I fX V' I f r.= r > ir . ^ • ' > N** •#* “ ■‘ J-* . \ ■*> i \'V^ >>:'■■-iij:jt®^,ij, '<>*i '--• .fi/ v;. / • ‘ ‘ * >T jy V # *< >Sr,<rt' « \> I ■Isr 4 ^ ^ % • ^ „ ' I U'y»^ rtk|: r • \ ► ''^. i » - /^4 iV., ^ $f l-¥ :/ -aJi i1;._3'K^' 4 'f-.’4!» i 1^,-r y#ii fern ' ■"■; f b' rb?; rs^ 'fy^m # ^9 i “ 1 p/^ if -^1 -i.-i i. 4iNi# « - .£ >4; yP77 K- If •9 -^9 w .;* •: j- ' I ;'. m'd.' A '■Qi I iiil /* jr S'.• * J A* j: #t V" ■ b*. - • < I V To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson PrcHn: Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: April 15, 1987 #1133 Betty Miner, 3830 and 3860 Bayside Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Class I Public Hearing Iiist of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Sketch of Miner Properties Wetlands Map Inventory Card - 3830 Bayside Road Inventory Card - 3860 Bayside Road Metes & Bounds Sketch of Division +/- AcresTotal Area = Approximately 20 Parcel A = 1.6 acres Parcel B = 4.0 acres Parcel C * 14 +/- acres Review of Application: The rezoning of portions of the Miner property became effective upon publication in the official newspaper last month. Parcels A, B 6 portions of C (extend north boundary line of B through C) are now located within the LR-IA zoning district. As staff noted before, Mrs. Miner plans to sell each of the three developed parcels separately. It is my understanding that Parcel C (referred to as the old farm house lot) will be divided into 2 lots. The dry buildable lands along the Luce Line located within the RR-IA (5 acre minimum) will be divided off the farm house lot. Prior to selling the homestead (Parcel A), Mrs. Miner wishes to increase the severely restricted l*j acre site (3/4 acre dry) by adding approximately 4 acres (Parcel B). This realignment will now provide 1.5 acres dry contiguous lands. Although the lot line rearrangement involves an extension of a lot line north of the developed areas of both Parcels A fc C, staff is concerned with the location of structures and other improvements within Parcel A that appear to encroach into Parcel C. Please review Exhibits E, F 4 G. Staff is aware aerial mapping and septic inventory cards are not the most accurate tools but this will be the last time that the City can legally seek remedies, if indeed, encroachments exist. -I Zoning File #1133 April 15, 1987 Page 1' cC 2 Staff would ask that the east or closest portion of house on Parcel A be located from lot line referred to as "Line A" in addition to septic dralnfield, well and any other improvements that support use on Parcel A. Staff has asked the surveyor to confirm that no drainage and utility easements are within the area of the realignment. Staff Recommendation: Staff would recommend that Planning Commission table action until your May 4th meeting at which time applicant's surveyor will have had an opportunity to locate all improvements near or possibly encroaching the east lot line of Parcel A. Does Planning Commission feel structures on Parcel C adjacent to "Line A" should also be included? If we must ask for a further adjustment of the shared lot line, it may be important to have exact location of these structures also in determining a workable or acceptable division line. k ^sl' #1 CITY OF OkuBU J0L JL Q.'i ‘"..-'a ! 15d ^ ^ Date Rqc'd D"IO - ?7 d srFee R( ■) nKCK <-fJ *' SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM APPLICANT Name h' f t i l i //( v J ‘1 /I ■■ Mailing Address 'S^L-C Telephone ^/5 ^ PROPERTY Name OWNER /> i-Telephone Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION -<Street Address cv Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) r !) ') - ?> J,? / -j) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXI TING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size A *res Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify) ________ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per _Acres Minimum Lot Size:Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) (OVER) 1* Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. w ^ V \Z j • above list w^t^nl*^return Pre-addressed to each of the names on the ~ « _ aSn.i7““ »•• *».*=.«..». — -- - - - -Date . ......«,„. ,p„. 2. Signed certificate of sur«- / , * , “li” copies of formal plat. 3« Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. S. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security w*. o^v-ujLxuy# Zonin§^S?ficials Sig^aturr^"*'“®"‘ Application is complete. - - --- --- - - _ Date fees Sketch Plan Review (class I, n , nx) Preliminary Review (class I * ij Subdivisions) $1F0300 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) $250.00 - fjsi .'iS __ $300.00 plus 20.00/lot $150.00* information required Commission and Council necessarv ' =ity Engineer, City Attorney, Planning to pay all additional fees estLnlS:rbrord‘nf?cer"'°^‘""" ^“tt»>er agr«l Applicant *8 Signature/-, ' Signature J MS.I^ate '^ //y/a y Date Plannlng^Cora^i^sl^on Met^^ offices 25 days before the the third Monday of each montjf ^ are usually held on li ^ ^ f' . ^_ _tH os'-tn-z-3 -asr- •1 1 3^30 11^ H % m • i V r . ^ ':i' 4. 'm oacou UJcr zo K“ U UJ Q. (/) 2 ^!«B» A f I / I 1 I I i •I / UJ K < O UJu 2 < Q.soo Ui H < O 5\n v;^Kj :5 Vl O 5 V UJ 3 «• •>> I fN '"'V Is X § 5 2 s T? O e ^ 2 O «f 0>•w w JT ■- T5 C« $o 8 «uc C c ?2 I % S y ^ f s a? H» s a g S O S g r- CN « D Uc Oz 2 CE O LL 2 Ou 2 0 2 1 2 O CE < 0 2 < »- (O flO D (/) 1 CO O 2 s g UL 2 Ou> I o ‘n! [&■ . 0 1 Ooz•n O 3)s Zo i/t I to C CO CO H > Z O > 3 O Z I zozooz*n O 3s zo ^ c w w - ----f H-? i 9^ « S Qiisy1 15 g » Cl n d o &Is I tJ I %r* I0 Mc >b T1 % ro oc I CO - ^8 \ o > H ffl Z (Oum O H oz 3mno 3 O no S 3r >zo ffl o > Hm O >rr QZ (O 3cs 3oc -« 3m O O 3 O \ \ \ \ \ \ . .4* X. PROPOSED LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR BETTY MINER IN LOT 53, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 203 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ht #1133 ■SsO ? # M # ’ ri----1', ‘“‘■V 53 fC TOTAL 4UA ' % U ACML* \M^ TA•^^U.tw >NnH ' lAfrt U»i C f UT IS MMS JAn \ InO 1 UHl Of X tcn>T»% TOO f^lir of LOT \\ I I * t imt I* existing description (A) Thai part of the South 200 fen of Lot 53. Auditor’s Subdivision Number 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota.lying Westerly of a line hereinafter referr^ to as "Line A", said "Line A" being described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot; thence West along the South line of said Lot a distance of 300 feet to the point of beginning '"• said "Line A"; thence deflecting right 65® to the North line of said South 200 feet, and there ending. PROPOSED DESCRIPTION (A ♦ D) A) That cart of the south 200 feet of Lc* 53. Auditor's Subd»vision Number 203. Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line hereinafter referre; to as "Line A", said "Line A" being described as fcliows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot; thence West along the . south line of said Lot a distance of 300 feet to the point of beginning of said "Line A"; thence deflecting right 85 degrees to the north line of said south zoo feet, and there ending; B) AL50 that part of the^’ north 488.00 feet of the south 688.00 feet of said Lot 53 lying westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the terminus of said "Line A"; Uience North parallel with the east line of said Lot to tlie norO line of said south 688.00 feet and said line there ending. DESCRIPTION OF REMUNING PARCEL (C) Lot 53, Auditor’s Subdivision Humber ; 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part of the south 200 feet of said Lot 53. Auditor's Subdivision Number 203, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of A line hereinafter referred to as "Line A", said "Line A" being described as fellows: Commencing at he southeast corner of said Lot; thence west along the south line of said Lot a distance of 3u2 feet to the point of beginning of said "Line A"; thence deflecting right 85 de ^ es to the north line of said south i >f»*et. and there ending; ALSO EXCEPT hat part of the north 438.00 feet the south 688.00 feet ^2°^ w-sterly of the following describtfd line: Commencing at the terminus of said "Line A"; thence North parallel With the east line of jiaid lot to tht fK>rth line of said south 688.00 feet and said line tner ending. ; . jT coiiHfa Scale: f ■ 100* Date : 2-20-87 COFFIN I GR0HPER6. INC. Engineers, land Surveyors and Piarmer long Lake. Mirnesota L.SauTW L»«lS c^f ut T a% ■-J ri feT-STW. r .•A ^1 ^O:Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:April 16, 1987 SUBJ:#1136 Richard Hassel, 840 Hunt Farm Road Subdivision - Replat - Class # Purpose of replat is to redesignate Outlet D, Huntington Farm as a buildable pad within the existing PRD of 9 units. Pertinent Sections of the Code ~ 10.32 PRD Chapter 11 - Def.66(G) Idst of Exhibits - A - Application B - Resolution 2029 C - Plat Map D - Plat of Huntington Farm Review of Application - In August of 1986, Council approved the final plat of Huntington Farm (formerly reviewed under the name Plentywood). The preliminary subdivision was filed in 1984 by Craig Winters and the review of the preliminary plat was prolonged by problems resulting from the Painters Creek Watershed project that redirected the flow of drainage or rather intensity of drainage to the wetland area within the subject pro-^erty. Everything was blamed on the original engineering of the neighborhood beavers. Beavers had created dams in the upland waterways that caused flooding of the low retention areas within the subject property. The current applicant and owner has not attempted to reclassify low land areas. The rural PRD is a unique phenomena in Orono. It is staff's understanding that most Cities' codes allow PRD development only with municipal services. Orono allows PRD's as long as tht overall dry buildable standards for total units of the specific zoning district are maintained as well as septic (primary and alternate sites). The applicant must first prove that there are unique or limiting physical features with the land that strongly suggests a need to cluster homes. The City also approves special setbacks for each "pad" - please note the City classifies them as pads but the County surveyor is bound to label them lots. Each residential pad has a defined building envelope with primary and alternate drainfield sites defined and established at preliminary approval. The shared commons or open space areas may surround these pads as with the Huntington Farm PRD or as with the Painters Creek PRD (former Ski Tonka site) may be immediately adjacent to a grouping of pads. I 1 Zoning File #1136 April 16, 1987 Page 2 HuntingtoNFarm has a total of 57.1 dry buildable acres and 74.64 wet acres. In the first review, the applicant had to confirm dry buildable pads of 2+ acres in area for each of the nine buildable pads. The required dry buildable area for the nine units would be 45 dry acres based on the area standards of the RR-IA zoning district. The current proposal seeks approval of an additional residential pad for a total of 10 untis requiring 50 acres of dry lands. The area standard for the PRD is satisfied with 57 total dry acres. Outlet D was singled out at the preliminary approval of the subdivision to be a shared - commons area because of the existing animal barn. The new owner and applicant for the final plat had no intention of keeping the barn nor of allowing the keeping of horses within the subject property by future owners. Outlot D was excluded from the shared commons area and to be formally recognized as beloning exclusively to the owner. The barn on Outlot D is in the process of being dismantled. Septic testing is being done some time this week. The septic site evaluator has confirmed testing areas will not be near the barn site. Outlot D contains 3.7 acres of dry land and will be one of the larger sized pads. Per resolution 12029, setbacks will be as follows: front/rear = 50' side ® 30* Staff cannot recommend approval of the replat of Oultot D until septic tests confirm suitable area for primary and alternate on site sewage disposal sytems. Mr. Gronberg has confirmed that he will have the test data prior to our Monday meeting. Mr. Hassel must provide a site plan confirming building envelopes and septic envelopes within the pad. Such approval must contain the following conditions: 1 - All conditions of approval for the plat, Huntington Farm as set forth in resolution 2029 of the City of Orono shall 'apply to the redesignated building pad. 2 - a) Setbacks for building envelope shall be 50 feet for front/rear yards. 30 feet for side yards. b) Septic envelopes to mantain a 20 feet setback from the proposed building envelope and boundary line of each pad. 1 ■1 m \ 1 . •n i CITY OP ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM y, O Pi 0. ^ Date Rep'd 3 • 5 P? By ^^0 Fee Rec'd j? <^/~), cj 2^>—_Farms //5& fix CjUpi-^ J)CS!d APPLICANT Name Lake Region Properties. Inc.Telephone 473-8121 First National Bank Building Mailing Address 1055 E. Wavzata Blvd; Wayzata, MN 55391 PROPERTY Name Richard A. Hassel OWNER Telephone 473-4604 Mailing Address 885 Hunt Farm Rd.; Long Lake, MN 55356 (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address 840 Hunt Farm Rd.; Long Lake,*MN 5356 Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 1 Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Barn out bldgs - Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) ^___ "'ubdivision for New Building Sites Number of Build.^^ng Sites:9 T Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density 1 Units per Acres Minimum Lot Size:PUD-5 acresquare Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) (OVER) ' • m mm « material necessary - • ^2,1 di O'Certified ProDerf„ o "®^ti*#^,,g SurV^ obtained from^tif^^- °''’’®t-'s li„* Center 348^327^^ Appiice,i.„ Completed 3- Certified PtopettlT"'”^''^°’'Obtained from^<-jf^^ Owner's lis^. -ter 348^3^7^^ —Co^tte.^^-t^ <t.is iiat can . " &fisr^---enveiope3 .io, t with no return addres,' P'^^'^^’d^essed to each e complete. Zoning Departmenr .. = °n the minimum HATpi9t^7\ '--Oate , „ ^ necessary for -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ■- - -— -• P^ytent Of fees (pet^ fees, fii- ARPlicatiom- - - - - - 2* Signed certificate of '^^ter ass J. Pae«_ _ _ 4. 5. Easements, Covenants,' '-'’'tenants, etc. Developers Agreement and a Eertli..cation by z.ni ""^P^able form of security ■"* «>■.« «».I „„ - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------- *• Sketch Plan Review Cci^ Preli^i ® « m) "^nary Review (class I « t. ^ k Ereli„inery Review ^“‘xJivisio ,s) (Class III and aii Pinal Plat Re • *(Plus any leoli“ 'Class III) - - ------------!r?f!!!— 5150.00 $250.00 $300.00 plus 20.00/lot $i50.00* -PPilcant has read the T- - - - - - - - ConJtlls?on^f„'’/the ^°nlnrAdmfn?s"t|e\^ to provide all i ^ Applicant's Signa,!^ Owner's Signature^ •* ^ nldon .^V.' / ' ■ ‘ .jr City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2029 A RESOLUTION TiPPr^O /ING THE plat HUNTIWGTCL IAPM PILE NO. >M1 Winters and Janette O. Winters the subdividers,- and ^ ^ aboroval *“9ust 27, 1984, the City Council granted froreach^"buifdT'°The envelope and the boundary lines of LIh pad huildiaVse^actHs f^ll^wsr^*’ P'"' maintain approlei Pads 1-4, 8 and 9 - front/rear 50', side 30' ‘ P®'”' -®'' side 30'ad 7 “ front/rear 50*, right/west side 30* Pads 2,left/east side 52* structures must be located 100 feet from existing animal barn in Outlet D Development^hrf^benn^fL®^^^"''^^ ® Planned i^esidentiri Resicential Development Code? On-Site^Septic^Code^fnd^^M^^?h^ t7',L“S.U- r/""‘= .'K sibdivideis have completed all equirements of the platting regulations of the City,*^ including: eAea.entV.'''^^" drainage and utility Page i of 3 A**- -**4 '*»■ .^J i; e * •: t [ ViV ! City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2029 iMt 2. Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot B, to be known henceforth as Hunt Farr Road, 3. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the Subdividers have dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlot; the Subdividers have created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said Outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. 4. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". 5. Dedication to the City of an open space easement over Outlot A to fulfill the density requirement for nine residential units in the RR-IA Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 5 acres of dry land per unit. 6. Execution of a Special Lot Combination to define common ownership relationship between Outlot D, Block 1, Huntington Farm and the residential pad. Lot 1, Block 4, Huntington Farm. The Special Lot Combination shall also establish controls on the use and building limitations for Outlot D. Outlot D with existing barn and coral shall serve as accessory to Lot 1, Block 4. Outlot D shall not be considered as an independent residential pad/unit and must be set aside tor density credit" for nine unit PRD in RR-IA Zone. 7. Creation of private covenants restricting use of shared commons area within Outlot A. 8. Execution of a Subdivider’s Agreement providing for installation of the following r^ad improvements within Outlets B and C as a condition of subdivision approval: a) 8 inch base of Class 5 gravel; b) 3 inch bituminous surfacing; c) ditches 2 feet below centerline crown (applicable to roadway within Outlot B). 9. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $800.00. pane ? of 3 r , '; :(• % s• -__# \ : Vr-: ..v • j I ’ ' t • . 5 V *' .. : •V. . City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2029 10. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount of $150.00. NOWr THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Huntington Farm, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. Access to all residential pads shall be via the plat road. Building permits for new construction shall not be issued by the City until the required base worlc has been installed and approved by the City. 2. Subdividers must stake all drainfield envelopes prior to any land alterations. 3. Culverts shall be installed within Outlot C, the shared driveway, per engineering plans by Coffin & Gronberg dated 7/28/86. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District must inspect culverts at time of installation. 4. Subdividers are placed on notice that alteration of a designated wetland will require a separate conditional use permit review and that all improvements involving hardcover within commons area must’ maintain 26 feet setback from edge of designated wetlands. 5.The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or be/ore February 11, 1987 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the docum.ents as noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 11th day of August, 1986. L2 1 ■V, fmmm' m . WM p- ’' i^?v-',ii ^■wc:.• "- Ij ilM-. fm:: i / f - I infi tiVl r* »aw<j\\r " . ^1 Xii IP, t M I t v; Ul 4 ir ~-V »o 'y \JV o • 'A o ' A ~j - .v\ ® * ‘*#Y « •- 4\ ij»•V--' 1 • •*^ »• *•V I i1 / ^'*1 • 1 .A 1 f- V .. ■* *» •f' Vs 7it •'ii'i I’l! 1*1 ♦ * < ■li'" i^./r./ V j 1 * « 40 'W .. ___Ak 1 c 4U ♦'4K' , mmta •• ^ Commission Chairman KelleyST.sssi.jrKs.r.“*” Jeanne A. Mabusth. Bnildinj s zoning Adbiniattater April 15, 1987 Condi^iona!'"usf lermi^ ^ ^SeLnd^le^^ Review of Application: meeting Pending^revLS^^appropriate "aa^nci A*" February 17th reported back to the staf/.^ The DNR p c a' « ^ ^^encies have require permit reviews. ^Alf but DNR will not assistance for the City if the nermii- i provioed guidelines or require a permit but will not isturthL netLfM.C.W.d. will on the conditional use permit. permit until the City formally acts List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit J - Exhibit J ~ MCWD Letter of 3/3/87 Minutes of MCWD 3/19/87 MCWD Letter of 3/24/87 "Nn^tter°Sr3AV8? L?t?lr'of‘'?A8/8?®''"''^'"®"‘ Environment s Energy Minnesota P.C.A. Letter of 3/20/87 Park Construction Letter of 3/31/87 Cook Letter of 4/15/87 Revised Grading Plan Submitted by Park Construction Review of Infonaation Received Prom Reporting Agencies- P^°vlding°level’ e^°evItio^s" a“d^ V°aXal'’l lo°™®'' acceptable l^vtlrors^^lo-Zeet^olTiYl- p^ode“l.^^ nl^rm%n\"s^ ^/Vo rh^e'^rxfent^^^ the Department of ^Environment Enerav^ ~ owner - this dump site. Both M.P c A and th^ nJ review all proposed uses of discourage the use of tht ?and Environment and Energy contamination, cultlvAf-^nn v.tr> j agricultural purpose - produce and increase leachate No ®ridanger/weaken Integrity of ground cov«r conditions created by decX^iMoTo^^'^fr" un stable groL^S increases potential of methLe aas do f l ^ debris. Construction Department of Environment and P^^lyticn and danger of explosions, range if no buildings are involved?^ finds no problem with use as a driving Staff's Review Ccxmnents: p6rmit°from^^^,‘^)To^o°2"o%^Vo'i ’'cubl^^^ ®°"ditlonal use eOjOOO to 100,000 cubic yards. Pin.i Vo^b'Ve1,th*,^ Zoning File #1103 April 15, 1987 Page 2 of 3 amounts of fill over the dump site - as'cook also excessive land could force organic materia f ^ =°’’=“rs, the additional surrounding marsh. We agref l^a? A wo , 1 ?^use a rise in the but with no more than 5 feet of fil 1 ^ ^ benefit to fill the area cover restored. be leveled and ground many Vorhores'^'retLurn" ar^^rand" u®n the topog^raphy and condition of .rruL^"o%e“r";rvi^dirp\\^°„^^^ addition, to any"commen^^^^ he may^have on*the^ li° amended proposal, in the site. The applicant should he ,=vla r the future use of with the application as amended by staff. ° if he wishes to proceed If the applicant wishes to proceed wit-h •f-ho • *. • asking the applicant for furthL more deLilL^yfi sedimentation plar^i, schedule of fills erosion and direction from the Council. " staff would seek conceptual Options of Action for the Planning C >, Ml I Ilission: amended by staff and *tV^ direct "s^t^ff^to^draft applicant or as denial for formal actiln'lt your May /th'^meltin^f-<=>•• aLnd°ed ‘'by°sta«^\''d%%"X*e"c\%\^^^^^^^ conditional use permit as recommendation with approoriat-#* f^ns^• pref.ent the Planning Commission direction to the applicant ?f Cou:,c?1 f"'* ""ceptual recommendation, bring the conditional Planning Commission Cc emission for^orma! action Planningapplicant: ^ eceipt or the following from the existing* Uogriphy';2%"o^^^^^^^ accurate elevations ofratio. P°g'^aphy (2 foot elevations). Side slopes not to exceed 5:1 2.Sedimentation and erosion plan to follow the following guidelines: eiistVng s°lone.^"®V a^ feet in from the top of ?xV.°/otV-Ts • i!"® “ “ (9 3%;Yu?5 ‘Veei 3.Sch^'Uule of fill activities: a) Time j b) Plan for filling - segment - phased; area?®®‘°"‘'^®'’ 9tound cover- no longer than 30 days in any 1 > I ftmrn 11 llfi •M: r«nri^•IK •llflF [•Klin Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 19# 1987 Page 4 g-^52 W. John Bill - Dredging to remove 310 cubic yards of soil for navigational access# Sec.l2CC# City of Minnetrista_;- - - - The engineer reviewed the application for maintenance dredging and indicated that the site had been previously dredged in ISIS under a permit from the District. The engineer recommended approval subject to DNR approval of the application. It was moved by Thomas# seconded by Andre that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. 87-51 Tonka Bay Marina/Toberman Management - Stormwater Management Plan for development of 1-acre hard surface on 4.67 arr^s. Sec.27BB, Citv of Tonka Baj-mmwMrnmmthe project by the City of Tonka Bay. It was moved by Spensley, seconded by Miller that the application be tabled as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. g7_3B Howard Eisinger - Placement of 80#000-100,000 cubic ^,"rds of fill on top of a sanitary landfill, Sec.32BD, City of Orono. /The engineer noted that Mr. Eisinger was present spiJ ®hed to address the Board to seek concept review by the Board of proposed ...•I If -a. af i nnai san’tarv landfill. Upon motion dulyaddress tne ijoara to seen ---------------- j i..filling at a non-operational sanitary landfill. Upon |^otion duly made and seconded the application was Thl engineer reviewed the concept proposal and indicated that the en^intlr had treated the issue as a fill issue under the Dis*-rict's rules. The engineer further recommended that other aspects of the development proposal be reviewed by the Minnesota Solution control Agency, the City of Orono, the Deoartment of Natural Resources, the Hennepin County .^oii water Conservation District and the Hennepin County Environment and Energy. Following roview of the moved by Andre# seconded by Spensley ftaencies asGranted subject to review and approval by all other agencies as recommended’in the engineer's memota.idum. Upon vote the motion carried. Public Presentations/Donald Rinqham The Chairman noted that no other members of “2rs Vf'^the in connection wirh permitpublic were present in connection with other matters. Accotdi g y. ■; m \ ktaurshco ioundary ^ !VniV]I\3iHAHA CTiEEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 MiM OF MAtHCtRS- OavW H. Cochran. Pres. • Albert L. Lehman • E. Thomas Camille 0. Andre • James R. Spensley * Richard R. Miller * Michael B Car^ Permit Application No; 87-38 Date: March 24, 1987 Owner; Location: Purpose: Howard Eisinger 3245 Wayzata Blvd Long Lake, MN 55356 City of Orono, Sec 32BD, between the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and Highway 12, south of Lake Classen Placement of 80,000 to 100,000 cubic yards of fill on top of an existing non-operational sanitary landfill Dear Mr. Eisinger: At the regularly scheduled March 19. 1987 meeting of the Board of Hanasens. the subject permit application was conceptually approved. Final approval wl.l be required by the Board of Managers after receipt of the following: 1 Rpwi^w and anoroval by the City of Orono, Hennepin County Soil and Water Conservation^and the Hennepin County Department of ??op« of lesf than^:!, and existing and proposed contour elevations. These Items should be received no later than April 6. 1987 to ensure you permit appltcatton will be on the agenda for the next meeting of the Board of Managers scheduled for April 16, 1987. Should you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at 473-4224. Very truly yours. EUGENE A. HIC: OK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the district cc: Board G- Macomber J. Mabusth, City of Orono Julie Johnson, Engineer • > l... Hennepin Conservation District \/ ( MAR I 3BW i M D 0 \ March 10, 1987 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 Dear Jeanne: I have discussed the application for a conditional use permit by Mr. Howard Eisinger with Mr. Patrick Kennedy, District Administrator, and we have the following recommendations: 1. Side slopes of the deposited fill should not exceed 3:1; 2.Fill should not be placed on slopes; the existing side 3.Erosion and sediment control practices will be required to protect the wetland from sediment damage during and after grading operations; 4.The City of Orono should require the applicant to submit an erosion and sediment control plan for approval by the City; and 5.The erosion and sediment control plan should show the proposed practices and their location, time of implementation of those practices relative to other grading/filling activities, maintenance schedule for chose practices designed to retain waterborne sediments on-site during the period of grading ard filling, and the plan fhould also show how the site will be restored, covered or revegetated after the placement of fill has been completed. We also have the following comments: 1.Our office is willing to assist the City of Orono and the applicant determine the best control measures for preventing sediment from reaching the marsh. 1 ?05 Ridge Plaza BkJg, 12450 Wayzala Boulevard Minnetonka. Minnesota 55343 Telephone (612) 544-8572 'J i ; P 2.Wy will need a full size plan sheet indicating the existing and proposed elevations (with 2 foot contour intervals if possible), the proposed areas for the placement of fill and the amounts of fill to be placed in these areas to properly advise the City of Orono and the applicant regarding the selection of appropriate sediment control measures. 3.Information regarding practice selection, main tenance and site restoration is available in our handbook "Construction Site Practices for Land and Water Conservation". 4.The City of Orono may wish to consider a phased or staged permit that allows additional fill only if the first stage has been completed to the satisfaction of the City. I hope that our preliminary review has been helpful. If you would like to discuss this matter further please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, 4oel Settles District Limnologist cc: Mr. Howard Eisinger . JC'-m M t. i STATE OF '[f^Q[^fl[lS(S)'Tr^ ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONENO. 296-7523 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 FILE NO, March 13, 1987 Ms. Jeanne Habusth CITY OF ORONO P. 0. BOX 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 !?i(d-T7 V.,''[iJ\v/■7:3 i I . 1 m I 7 1987 RE: HOWARD EISINGER, C.U.P., WETLAND 27-8A1W Dear Ms. Mabusth; Thank you for the opportunity to review the referenced project. As you are aware, the site is surrounded by DNR wetland #27-841W. If, as indicated in your memo dated February 12, 1987, Mr. Eisinger places all fill at least 26 feet from the wetland edge (DNR has not established a formal ordinary high water level, but the edge is fairly well defined in this instance) we have no objection to the proposal. Please feel free to contact me should you have further questions. Sincerely, riidy Boudreau -irea Hydrologist METRO REGION DIVISION OF WATERS J19/dv AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER . j ..1 ii ■ liV A [ f j^, HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY 822 South Third Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 ll r— ].^\\ MAR19B8T ,.3 Phone:(612)348-6846 March 18, 1 Ms. Jeanne A. Nabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono Municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Jeanne: Hennepin County has reviewed the material for the Howard Eisinger permit application (P.I.D. 32-118-23 14 0001) for the property located at 3245 Wayzata Doulevard involving the filling of approximately 80,000 to 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill to use as cover material for the area previously used as a landfill dunping site. County staff concur with the recommendation that the fill be placed 26-i- feet fr^ the surrounding wetlands. It is also recommended that the use of an erosion control barrier as called for on page 2, paragraph 3 of the applicaticm be installed. The County has no problem with the present proposal for the site provided that only clean fill is placed on site, and provided that the fill be placed so as to promote good surface water run-off and vegetative cover. However, the County would have an interest in any future use of the site involving activity that could harm the integrity of the cover or the previous landfill material. Specific concerns about future use of the site, beyond the current proposal, may focus on matters such as gas migration or groundwater contamination that would necessitate monitoring, control and corrective action to mitigate any potential harmful effects. If you have ai^ questions, please contact us. Sincerely, Edward Monteleone Principal Environmentalist EM:tma MABUSTH HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opporfunlty employer I :-r ^^2 Jisgj^ VMinnesota Pollution CoTitrot-Aggncy March 20, 1987 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55325 Dear Ms. Mabusth: Re: Former City of Orono Dump With regard to your March 17, 1987 telephone conversation with Mr. John Moeger ar.'J past conversation with me regarding the former dump for the City of Orono, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has no objection to the work which is being proposed to improve ttie site. I spoke with Mr. Howard Eisinger on February 24, 1987 and he explained his proposal to place clean fill on top of the landfill. Following the placement of the fill, the landfill will be graded and seeded. MPCA approval is not needed for placement of clean fill over the site. I spoke with Ms. Julie Johnson of Hickok and Associates, representing the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, on March 17, 1987. She had called with questions about Mr. Eisinger's proposal. She informed me that the former dump may be used for agricultural purposes or for a driving range. The MPCA strongly discourages using old dump sites for growing any type of harvested crop. Deep-rooted crops will destroy the cover and would likely die anyway due to absorption of contaminants from the waste. Any type of cultivating would destroy the cover and allow for more water infiltration into the waste, resulting in a higher production of leachate. As water passes through the garbage, it picks up toxic chemicals (creating leachate) and carries them on into the ground and/or surface water. There is evidence of ground water contamination due to leachate in many of the landfills in Minnesota. Any reduction of water infiltration will reduce the risk of ground and/or surface water contamination. There is also a liability concern over the possibility of crops absorbing metals and other toxic contaminants. Phone:. 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Regional Offices * Duluth/Brainerd/Dstroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Cnual Opportunity Employer ■ifc G- i 'I- s Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Page Two Although MPCA staff discourage the use of former dump or landfill sites converting the site into a driving range would be one of the least objectionable uses. Please be aware that some problems may arise. Methane gas is produced by the decomposition of the waste. This gas escapes through the path of least resistance. If any structures are built near the site, they should be periodically tested for the presence of methane since methane can easily travel around foundations and through any cracks in foundations. Methane can be explosive in enclosed spaces at certain concentrations. Buildings should not be placed over the fill for this reason and also because of uneven settling which v/ould occur as the waste decomposes. MPCA staff offer the fcllowing recommendations for Mr. Eisinger's project: Cover soils should be grade l to provide a minimum two percent slope and no greater than a 25 percent slope. The surface should be seeded with shallow- rooted grasses of a quick-rooting variety such as MnOOT mixture «5. The safest use of the land from an environmental standpoint is to let it remain vacant so that the cover is not disturbed. As I discussed with Mr. Eisinger and you, the work should be completed in accordance with all County and local ordinances. Mr. Eisinger should work with Ed Monteleone of the Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy to ensure that all work that is done is acceptable to Hennepin County. As long as only clean fill is used and Mr. Eisinger works with Hennepin County, MPCA staff need not be involved. We would be happy to provide technical assistance if needed. If you have further questions, feel free to contact me at 612/29G-8595. Sincerely, Carolyn J. Di^dorf 0 Enforcement Unit Solid Waste Section Solid and Hazardous Waste Division CJD:lh cc:Mr. Ed Monteleone, Hennepin County, Minneapolis Mr. Howard Eisinger, Orono Ms. Julie Johnson, Hickok and Associates, Wayzata il hi I ■ m tm ESTAUtisHEO 1916 telephone 786-9800 •?.rsrru'-erAVAT.^,boao bu «loino • PILE DBWJNQ« SEWER. WATER Installation ■ bridges ■ golf courses qWH -3I9ER K^rch 31. 1987 Howard ^^®^”^gQ^;iievard 3245 ^i®Sesota 55356 Long La^e, 07.38 Re: permit ^P^^^iition^l-andfiiiEisinger 32BD, between City of Orono, railroadthe^urlington Northe-”,^, tracks and T.H. Classen. Dear Mr. Eisinger, construction’® Enclosed Pl^^^t^tovemeni^of your former ‘ proposed sxte xmpro Stbris. ^SS‘'(^‘'y®rS‘'of°SllaniU ^*fitil°n “ tfone''f5 a ) -i>i%“vl£5s.rsr;.a?.-u J. - seeded. ,, will be placeo ParK construction estimates tnat^a^ «-rarlt°Serng\rur.e<i selded by the sPtih| « til times. Xhe ex- temely f^^^^-a-^uction will ptovx required.»s.?sss.»- u.r..“ sincerelyt park constru SP*! . John Gannon, P.8- project Manager jGtgp _ an equal OPPORTUNITY EUPUOYER - <* iJ-T 4 >'4- ■ p ’ Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 6126364600 Engineers & Architects Otto C. Bowstrvo, P.E. Hvbtfi W. Huamt. P.L. Jineph C. Amdertik, P.t\ Bradford A. Ltmherg. P.E, BKhard t. Turmet. P.E. damn C. OU^jn, P E. April 15, 1987 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 i©iDWi |5» Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139 - 1103 Howard Eisinger Cittm B. Cook, P.E. keuh A. OorUom, P.t. fhumtn t. hioftt. P.E. Huhitrd >♦'. f osier, P.E. Boberi C. Schuntckt, P.E. Marina L. Sorwda, P.E. Doaatd C. Burgardt. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdoa, P.E. Mark A. Haawa, P.E. 7ed K. Freid. Pt. Mn'Koet T. Bautmmaa, P. E. Bubrri B Pjrjjerk. P t. Uu*tdO Loskoia. P.E. Thomas *6’. Petersoa, P.E. Mahae! C. Lynch. P.E. karea L. WMo, P.E. James B. Klalaad. P.E. keaaeih P. Aaderson, P.E. keah A Bachmaaa, P.E. Mark B Boffs. P.E. Bobert C. Bassek, A.LA. Thomas E. Aagui, P.E. Skott L young. P.E. Charles A. Lrmkson LeoM Pamrisky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. tberUn Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the information submitted by several agencies on the Howard Eisinger application. We have used the information to develop recommendations for the filling proposed on the site. The site topography submitted by Park Construction does not appear to be com** plete. Our site visit indicated a more rolling topography. The site informa- tion will have to be more accurately completed prior to establishing the final grading plan. The existing topography is rolling with several low areas which can collect water or slow the ru..off from the area. The water which percolates into the soil from the low areas has the potential of generating leachate. The proposal to fill and level the site would have a positive effect on the site. The establishment of good ground cover would allow the water to be used by the vegetation or drain off the site. The depth of fill necessary to pro vide adequate cover on the site is not easily determined. We feel that 5 feet of fill would be adequate to level the site and provide cover. There does not seem to be any concern by the agencies reviewing the proposed project relative to the final elevation. Our only concern would be that the additional load on the site could force organic materials to move out. This could cause a rise in the marsh area outside the fill site. The wetland area around the site t^hould be protected with silt fence on all sides. The silt fence should be placed in a level area approximately 5 feet in from the top of existing slopes. The location of the top of slope is not well defined in most areas. We would, therefore, recommend a distance from the edge of the marsh equal to 4 times the depth of existing fill plus 5 feet. The side slopes on the new fill should not exceed the 5:1 ratio pro posed. The filling to the south should start 220 feet north of the Burlington Northern Railroad as shown on the plan. 3167e Page 1. X city of Orono Orono, MN April 15, 1987 Re: File No. 139 The filling should tske plsce in s nisnner which sllows completion of the res“ toretion ss (quickly as possible. We would reconmend that the slopes be re~ stored within 30 days after the filling begins in any area. The project schedule should be reviewed with the City prior to starting work. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. GRC:li 3167e Page 2. u ; u i ! i —1 -‘t 1c1!o ( t 1 ! 1 ' ^i...[ i - 4 . To: City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Caffron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator Date: April 14, 1987 Subject:#1109 Curtis L. Johnson, 2024 Shadywood Road Variances ” Public Hearing zoning District - LR-IC, k acre sewered Application - Lot area/lot ^Y/t^ house* b^)^put ^a^'n^w foundation lakeshore setback Yt further I'akeward to coincide with under it, centered a second stor^^^ it, parts of which wouldneighboring houses; c) put a secona y be in side yard setback. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map tist/Neighbor AcknowledgementsExhibit C - Property Owners List/Neign Exhibit D - Staff Memo of 2/10/87 Ixhibi^ F ; lurve^/Sketch per Applicant's Submitted and Staff Exhibit G - Sompos??riurvey of Neighborhood Pertinent Pacts: Lot Area Lot Width 0-75' Hardcover 75-250' Hardcover Right Side Setback Left Side Setback Existing 9,150 s.f. Avg. 40' 6.8% 27.8% 12.3' 1.9' Proposed 6.8% 30.8% 7'+/- 7'+/- Allowed or Required 21,780 s.f. 100' 0% 25% 10' 10' Variance 58% 60% 6.8% 5.8% 3'(30%) 3'(30%) > ‘.r Discussion: riorlc ;,pplicant originally proposed to add ^u"nstab!e“and not -e lo-^ He construct a new foundation, the ous neighboring houses, as lo°ns^^\^cra ”s;cona “V/or^/deck. I. Lot Area/Lot Width: lo\''“hal^ no®“prin recommends approval. I .* s, iring Ipa 1 :e no itaf f Zoning File #1109 April 14, 1987 Page 2 of 2 II. 75-250' Hardcover: . existing sidewalk and garage f with ^previus approvales in the would suggest this is very a. *.hat the existing garage location is neighborhood, and would icant or a future owner requesting unsafe and staff would envision the 24'x20' garage and i:o construct a new garag on the lot would have to be as high as lr.’‘ln^^hr7T-?5V^rn^e^l‘'n^o^r^^ .ara,e and driveway apron. IV. Side Setbacks: Centering the setbacks on eithar will be centered on its own lot but 17' between 202^ and 2016. (2024 more than it is now - existing a^^„s^^\‘'r‘ound- bo’th "sldH'^rrht Slu^“^"^iefs!brera^rJ\^cci°^odat:^%\fn=^^^^^^ etc. etc. V. Average Lakeshore Setbacks: App^l^^ca^^^^^^ determining the average setback line, ^ fence, 6' that the neighbor s deck at 20 32 Shay sticking out lakeward from the effective height -bo'V® ground 90% opaque, location of the 75 house, plus a second-story deck above . extend decks over it) rt^^rl^eiiSMcolfn^d rh^rthl aTera| setbech that the average deck setback should be Staff Recononendation: 1 ^ iri+* sncl lot Width vsrisncGSf staff recommends approval there is an existing house on finding no additional land available hardcover variances as proposed the property. Staff “commends th^ ^b^^pproved, finding that those (C-75’ hardcover = 6.8%, 75-250 - annrovals in the area. Staff percentages are consistent wi 71 either side be approved, finding ?ecommenL that the side “tbacks for 7 “ setbacks. Staff that this is a better situation than “e^ex^ st^^ g^ laKeshore setback recommends that no variances ® ^ . tequired average house structurefor the house structure ano that the requ^^^^^^^ second story setback be as shov>n on Exhibit P- . .1 lowed up to the average setbackdeck extending eastward from ^^^^ouse is allowed^ ^^ 25, Js\"a^d%%fra^Ving"«o;idVe^boS? 20% opaque, figuring IV' posts, with maximum openings). ri^RDCOVBR REVIEW ,1 2024 Shadywood Road ~ Zoning File #1109 0-75' - Area « 2,850 s.f. Existing: Shed + Steps 16.25 x 12 = 195 s.f. or 6.8%+/- No Change Proposed 75-250' - Area = 6,300 s.f. Existing:House Garage Concrete Walks Driveway 833 s.f. 390 s.f. 490 s.f. +/- 40 s.f. 1,753 s.f. = 27.8% Proposed: House + Deck 24,5 x 49 Garage Driveway Concrete Walks (3x80)+(3x3)+(4xl6) 1,200 s.f. 390 s.f. 40 s.f. 313 s.f. 1,943 s.f. * 30.8% It ^ r i 1 P loJ ^ *11 ^.r*r % A .*1 -•% *# •CT-. ■: n ‘iG J ••* . % *« r ••% Z»'y. \, Receipt 1 Initials ^ no‘^ uate Kec • u / y^> 6- V) Fee ^Atocc V * CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 2024 Shadywood Road, Orono, MN 55391 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 17-117-23-31-0011___________ Please check one ~ Is the property xx abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) 471-8897 Curtis L. Johnson and Name Pamela J. Willette kTl-kbbk Phone (work) 544-6699 lulling Adfdress: P.O. Box 246 3WNBR (if different than applicant) Name Same as above City I Spring Park Phone (home) Zip:55384 Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired 06/16/86 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ _ _ _ _I (2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property Single Family_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Unknown at this time Describe request in detail: Add second story to house, new roof on house and garage, new siding and paint on house and garage, deck on front of house__________ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front JC2(_ Hardcover Side Rear) i I .* • HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _Existing structure location_ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; House is currently 2.8 feet from lot line on NE side and 12.3 feet from lot line on SW side. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2.Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is, true^nd correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date January 22, 1987 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification^f Owner's Signature —________ Date January 22, 1987 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Applicant must have all submittdis into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. •l r -1'<S5 P J \ :u 4 a: .* i .V IT *--- j ' • V* • :• f®°^S ,16 sr i——t II— r''^' ~r' / ! •'i' , ^]Oe i t*o ocl( HyTownfitt of Langdon Pork !M) lAJNtf^VkLOPED) / ' 1*4<- ' ,1 U.^ "•' :'li“''1>fci]TH's 4 —^ HALCrO hr' HdLL\>tf^ -----------^ (41) ^Mi*’44 H i /;/ . . !» ■ ..................... ....... • 0 I (we) Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form RarJf^L-b /T Polios of ^ j(^0 ^ho^JiAVoor/ [print name(S)] . forint addresKl /[print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at xW also referred to as Land Use Application No. //^')9 . I \we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ■'R.rujJ f- Property Owner Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. I • • 1 (we) Adjacent Progerty O-ners* AcknowXedgenent Porn =50 aJ of 9^0/jy[print address]»print name(s) have reviewed the plans for the proposed inprovement or proposed use of the property located at Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware o but merely to confirm for the ciry Y 4.hafc the proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that the propot» requires Council approval. Pro^peirty Owner J Date Date PrfHt^erty owner If you have any “JbS ylur"conmen''“ to th| Bu”^^ ‘zSn^“ng‘o"ffi« ariea?t ‘l?"da^ys prior to the scheduled meeting date. A 5; ■ •. ■ < u Lew of !ing 4 ■V ■ . *;■ jw-v mn To- Mayor Grabek ranninrco-isSrShair»an Kelley Orono Panning Commission Members City Administrator Bernharason Prom: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator Date: February 10, 1987 sub-sect: #1109 Curtis b. Johnson, 2024 Shadywood Road - subject, _ public Hearing b, .ppUb... ~ are submitted to City. 4- ho on February 10, 1987, «f: secondstor^addl^ion to the that this would be the time to ^ (review the enclosed survey), complete new £°«odation was to be rnsta^^^^ structure closer to re !fh“irord^^^°to rTn Une ^th^^L adjacent residences. If the structure is to be moved a^tK setbacks for the amended designating the -^rflsV"d\scussed a desire for a lakeshore such°a decf would hav’e to also meet the average applicant was advised that sucn lakeshore setback line. Note for Review, Consideration, C •)nin lenttor KCVxew, ^- - - -- C 4-hp. in light of the ^review of the Schall application, it is now installed over that variance aPPli<=^V°''%”hat''it foca?ed within a required yardportion of a structure .'"’’at is locat involves an extension along would also require variances if a that a variance review would no existing substandard setback l^ne. N received variance approval for the Srrequired if a property had already r^ area, and, if, that=r,;r.r. horizontal expansion. Planning Commission Action: Move to postpone °^isea*'pL^t^foramen^^^^^^^the applicant has submitted revised plans p- / \ 1 % To: From Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 17, 1987 Subject: #1115/1116 Paul Boyke 795 N. Ferndale Road - Easement Vacation - Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing This item was tabled at your 3~16-87 meeting so that applicant could provide additional information. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Discussion: Topographic Survey Septic Testing Site Map - Alt. Site For Existing House Notice Of Planning Commission Action 3-26-87 Memo & Exhibits of 3-11-87 The applicant has submitted a topographic survey of the site, indicating the proposed driveway grading plan. That driveway can be located as originally proposed with road grades of 0-10% with only minor excavation or fill required. Where the driveway parallels the north lot line, it is proposed to be about 7' from the existing garage, and 15' from the lot line at the closest point, with side slopes of about 3:1 for most of that length, which should be adequate to maintain a vegetative cover. This also leaves room to provide whatever screening might be necessary depending on the angle of headlights toward neighboring homes on Hollander Road. Applicant has also provided alternate site septic testing for the existing residence; the alternate site is shown on the topographic survey. The driveway access alternative to the south would seem to pose a problem for the proposed house location with a garage proposed for the 1st story level. The initial problem would be the cutting and filling necessary to flatten the 19% slope area along the 30' corridor. There would be a fairly gentle grade northward to the house, then a steeper slope uphill again to the garage level. Alternatively, a driveway could be cut across the slope on an easement below the existing house, but would require a relatively wide cut and fill that aesthetically is not what applicants see as acceptable. Applicant notes that driveway along north lot line will be graded to slope to the south so that runoff goes away from the northerly boundary. Satff Recommendation A. Staff recommends approval of the vacation of drainage and utility easements along existing interior lot lines subject to granting similar easements along the newly configured lot lines. I f I Zoning File #1115/1116 April 17, 1987 Page 2 of 2 B. Staff recommends approval of the concept of a driveway easement across Lot 2 to serve lot 1, finding that the applicant has adequately addressed concerns about slope stability, garage stability, drainage and runoff, and screening and aesthetics. C. Staff recommends that the westerly lot (Lot 1) be platted as a "flag" lot with 30' access corridor along the south end of the property granted. The typical lot width variance is appropriate to be ZONING FILE NO. 1115/1116 v-'J ■ i ' V i I \l t CITY OF ORONO m 55323 473-7357_ _ _ _!e_of_Notice = NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 3/26/87 TO: Paul Boyke COPIES TO: 415 Zircon Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ TYP e”op'^PLICATION: XX Subdivision/Easement^Vacati^___________ DATE^orFffiETING'i 3/16/87 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Tabled; For reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Commission rabled these Planning Commission's concerns; 1) Topographical survey of* «4rs) proposed house site (NE portion of lot) ).) Proposed northerly driveway corridor ^Lisl?n%" |a%°rger lo"tro«° hol'^XIes'lnrrrli'n^g^^ "wYl'? h^ handled. 3) Optional- topography and layout for southerly driveway corridor. corridofftl'’addrfsr?he®pote^^^^^^^ -L^dUgM^'in-ne^VLort- windows" issue). 5) seotic testing for an alternate site for existing house - will need prior to Council preliminary approval. ^wliclnt'rnexrs^hedulermeeting are c^ as: Planning Commission April 20, 19—- - - Council April 27, 1987- - Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependen^^ of additional information. Deadline *or x: - - - - April 13. If you desire certified =°P>« fr|„°the c\\y RecSlJde? ^?S\^eV?e:tr^a;prfvII ^^th^''-Zi^ston. *• si fc> TO: FROM: DATE: SOBJ: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator March 11, 1987 #1115 & #1116 Paul and Virginia Boyke, 795 North Ferndale Road - Easement Vacation - Subdivision Public Hearings Zoning District - RR-IB, 2 Acre Unsewered Application - #1115 - Vacation of existing drainage and utilities easement along existing interior lot line. #1116 “ Rearrangement of lot lines to make the existing vacant lot feasible for owner's preferred house location. Note: This rearrangement is a re-platting of the subdivision due to the extent of changes proposed, and because of the necessity to dedicate additional conservation & flowage easements and future right-of-way. List of Exhibits - A - Applications #1115 and #1116 B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Survey with staff concerns and suggested layout of replat F - Airphoto portion G - Long term conceptual sketch for future potential road right-of-way Note: Applicant has purchased both Lots 1 and 2 of Brooks Green, hence he controls the entire property in question. I. #1115 - EASEMENT VACATION A 10' wide drainage and utility easement was dedicated to the public with the original plat of Brooks Green in 1980. That standard easement was 5' either side of the lot division line, and did not follow any established drainageway, but was merely intended to provide a functional corridor for utilities while serving no immediate drainageway purpose, given the general topography of the site. Given that no utility or drainage purpose is currently served by the existing easement, it is appropriate as part of this replatting process to vacate the existing drainage and utility easement along the interior division line, in exchange for the granting of a similar easement along the re-platted lot lines. ‘ I H I zoning Files #1115 & #1116 March 11» 198'^ Page 2 /t annroval of the vacation of the existing L\%“io “?rrrne utility easement. II. *1116 - LOT LIMB RBARRWIGBHENT ISSUES ^ Access to Ji£5££H.i2 n^^the°/ry Vf^the construct a driveway along the north lot line ano existing paved V-ocd residence at a relatively higharriving at the proposed re driveway along the elevation. He is = ‘‘'/ij’^verv Itlep, or would have to south line of the P^°P^^ immediately below the existing cut directly across ^he slope im™^^ ^ detriment to this unique p^Spert^both^^th^tically and environmentally. Staff agrees that, given the ^rs\? orLyra^^phe! new home while maintai ^ |c oerhaps appropriate but bearsthe proposed driveway location IS ^per^^^^^^^ located at some discussion. Firs » -;^e+- past of the property. Secondlyrleast 26- from the wetland 3ust east of^tne^p^ staff has concerns a north of Hollander Roadr specifically developed properties Hill (2 35 Hollander Road).Weinstein (259 Hoi lander Road) and Hii^^^ ^ ^ HOW will the driveway be graded i additional drainage, downhill properties ^proposed Inot required by code but and what, if any, screeni _£ . staff notes the existing still a consideration). north lot line; with the detached garage is ab t^0^ applicant must protect the garage ItabAity while not affecting the downhill • esidences. addressed and solved. B. Lot configuration l^la^^ Agce^ ex\''stinV'^hou^srand h3use location and the appropriate. However, you amenities, the north-sou shows a 30' corridor along the will note the \ nh 1 Lds nowhere. Staff suggests north end of the property, corridor at the south side of the it is appropriate to place thi ^egal access to the existing f''frag^ lo?That setbaclc line. I. Zoning Files #1115 & #1116 March 11, 1987 Page 3 Cul-de-sac Dedication. Please review Exhibit G, staff's long term concept of how a future public or private right-of-way would likely be configurated if "Lydiard Road" was ever required to be upgraded. Note that by definition (Section 6.01 Subd. 2, Subd. 3) "Lydiard Road" is a private road, not a private driveway, but does not meet many of the private road standards of Section 6.06 or Section 11.33, and it exceeds the limit of 10 residences for service by a private road per the Community Management Plan, Chapter 7, p. 16 (Transportation Plan). For these reasons, staff feels that there is a potential that at some future date the City may be compelled to require an upgrading of "Lydiard Road" to private road standards, i.e. a 50* right-of-way and 24'-28' paved width. Staff suggests it is appropriate to require that a portion of cul-de-sac for private road purposes be dedicated on the plat at this time, as shown on Exhibit E. This cul-de-sac location will have a relatively minor effect on the 5 adjacent properties as compared to a major effect if located entirely within one property, and will still be at least 26' from the wetland to the northeast. £:l Easterly Wetland. The pond/wetland east of the existing house was not called out on the previous plat, but does exist within the property. Staff recommends that a flowage and conservation easement be granted over this wetland, and be shown on the plat. Ms. Septic Sites. Primary and alternate drainfieldd sites were previously tested for the westerly lot, and these are still suitable for a new residence, although applicant may wish to find additional sites closer to the proposed house - this is applicant's prerogative. However, in 1980 we did not require that an alternate site for the existing residence be tested. It is appropriate that such testing for the existing house be required at this time. E. Lake Access. Applicant wishes to build his new home on the westerly lot and sell the existing house, but wishes to provide the existing house with a walking easement to the lake and perhaps to use the trail system within the woods. Section 11.03.66, states that "... creation of a ... private easement for any purpose" falls within the definition of a Class I Subdivision, and hence is permitted by metes and bounds subdivision process, but in effect does require City subdivision approval. Staff would suggest for discussion purposes that a 10' walking easement to the lakeshore may be reasonable in this case as long as it does not grant riparian rights or dock rights to the inland property. Does Planning Commission have any objections to this, in light of the fact that the 2 lots as currently configured both have lakeshore riparian access rights? Zoning Files #1115 & #1116 March 11, 1987 Page 4 II. SUMMARY A. Staff recommends approval of the vacation of drainage and easements along existing interior lot lines subject to granting similar easements along the newly configured lot lines. B. Staff recommends approval of the concept of a driveway easement across Lot 2 to serve Lot 1, only if the applicant can alleviate concerns of: i. slope stability, garage stability ii. drainage and runoff iii. screening and aesthetics C. Staff recommends that the westerly lot (Lot 1) be platted as a "flag" lot with 30' access corridor along the south end of the property. The typical lot width variance is appropriate to be granted. D. Staff recommends that a 50' radius portion of property centered at the southeast corner of the property be dedicated for future private or public roadway (or cul~de~ sac) purposes. E. Staff recommends that a Flowage and Conservation Easement be granted over the portion of wetland within Lot 2, and this be shown as a drainage easement on the plat. F. Staff recommends that septic testing to locate an alternate drainfield site for the existing house on Lot 2 should be required prior to submittal of this application to Council for preliminary approval. G. Staff recommends that Planning Commission address the issue of lake access in any recommendation to approve the subdivision. ' //' • f f * 0 ,r'' i CITY OF ORONO r-4 -in t-!!;j '■U> Date Rec'd <)’/ By Fee Rec'd SUBDIVISION application FORM applicant Name j, Mailing Address JJJj^ T./^.co,.') Uu< ..rru OWN^’’* A! -7, <r«ir/r fnKUOhRO - I Telephone ^e t?a?^^yer^ K?^0/ PROPERTY LOCATION street Address J22^' aA Mh. //<^ 5-3/ 5-0 00.^ //.g> .-3^-:? / /.Property Identification No. (P.i.d.) ^ooS _ _ _ _ _ _Complete^Legal^Description to be attached to application existing land use Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) ^_ _ _ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: / / 4^ Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per _Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. ‘Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. ^ certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - Date MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - /■: { •' n r,f FEES Preliminary Review ^ (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & HT) Preliminary Review (Class I i II Subdivisions) S250.00 $300.00 plus 20.00/lot $150.00* to pay all additional fees established b^^rdinance. Applicant's Signature^;W% Owner's Signature Vi D^te r2^/ 'y Date _ _ _ _ _ _ M^ltirg*!"^ p\annAT?om::!ssi M/-irtrlAv of Gach month Date Roc'd By _ _ _ _ _ Fee Rec'd CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM APPT.Tri^rNamr^^i//. UP. ^(J:/lCrhnt< L. Telephone ^7 J- Mailing Address ^IS 1 - PROPERTY Uame<fjri/S A) A:J^ P]EiAO't^tO^~ Telephone ^iXj- 74 3 *" V/iiS. OWNER Mailing Address ,12^CA/nnid mL A^^/Lr^ SAi/fA Z~lS01 (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION » Street Address C S^/2 a) ^ ^ 2C, {/S 9^2/ ^OoS Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) t—?0 ^ O^o /n/0 . Complete Legal Description to be attached to application EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size __ __X2 Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) __ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District /^/C / &_ PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:/ 7 Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: PrcSposed Use;, (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per _ _ Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ (OVER) mill 91 iin w=ra r«itTsT«i rd«ld|s1i^ fiTmUl i r# ■ •: Mfu U-‘V w.y * •''. * . ,;■ .V.'\ I'.f- ••' ..\;.V N5:v. '•r-: > y ^4-t I vV \\i '.r '.•.r;y.v^. * ^ ^9 , 'j •^r.\ ^I •• : /W V*J.* * /.‘-V "V**'*•1 •. ^ :-.V V.*v^. 'fl -\ ^ '/ •' '• •• •‘•4'^'''j;’ • • ’■.-'•^r'*-^ r1 • '•' ■ !v . • •••'..^•' *, * V.. • •-• '• .v'.Vv '^ <?• •■i ■• • ■ •: ."• ■ .-■ • ^v.'aJ;® '*•’ ■%•• • • c * < : .V ' \' v 0 '. »• 'V *•< M* »- ^*'1 n V'.. v.:v^-ir .‘:‘r > . ;!.; X X''' ••■■‘.■■- v* •■\.\ - x>:^:rrs- [ ..'; v.:.v.;v •■ •.*.:;■•■■ ■ - .-*r:■ •<^V U ' ^ '■:■ ■■'■ ■■'.■■ '■■• .. ■..■■•;>■'*■>• • ■ ■‘■tv.--/^ ->'<■■• ■; ' . ;■.•'' ' ' :: •I Mil# :«: ^urac f= •IkliUfBSl mivvi ^•T«J OT1..1..1. =r... th... •^-level total instead of 2. Vi -t-he site from Fox Streetr .». ...... <...i.«y- „,„«... builder: ^ . v. • 4. c=*-vnrture from 1) poor soils a"-* perhaps :°:ie'‘yo°h^e\%"w°rtt a%"c^eri%'^oaa f^’rol the north. H%S33 KfK.“r-~S “i ‘.v.significant hardship to justiiy y magnitude requeste . approval. Planning rormfs^s'^'on'ah;?u^d''\1d?rss^:^^^^^^^ ?L^p ”op"”i design conditions are approp acceptable. ,/,,ir-c>ss whether the 4-hPn Planning Commission should structure andThirdly, controls on future use of the str oroposed specified the property are appropri V V1r* h — T. /, V ——f I » O' ' ij?r/i * / V ...; i' <0 — t 1 :') \ I ';! ■< \/ ?*.-■•«*- S5I?U I r.* n;!^i f'• :?; k^! ^ / U. V' ' 0 V ^ 1 I ' U) V'. < •) F"'- V % • - 1 d, . I 0 :) ♦o‘. .. ?• : ■; t ■% I A./n • • * • I 9A ! t- ^1- Ir"t s.^ ; i . \ii i ti 'i llie\l;ic.MiIlaii Icimis C ourt Ol'Ulit, Ml incsoLl tlicMcNull> C'onipain 4t)(i 2ml Avenue Sinith. Suite h5<» Minne apolis. Miiun ’so'.i r / \ \ t •1 1 lU 1 m S \ CRAIGBANK VARIANCE APPLICATION I. HISTORY OF OCCUPANCY AND USE The property located at 1700 Fox Street, Orono, Minnesota was purchased in 1930 by John H. MacMillan, Jr. He (and his family) used the property as his residence until his death in 1960. The property then vested in his wife, Marion MacMillan. She continued to live in the house until her death in 1980 whereupon the property went to her three children, Hugh, Duncan and Marion. Since all three children were adults and had established residences elsewhere, a partnership was formed in 1981 to hold the property until another family member would use it as their residence. Currently, the property is used as the focal point of the MacMillan Family estate. The property is used by Family members who visit from other areas of the country as well as for Family gatherings. The property has been in the Family for over 55 years and will continue to be held for the foreseeable future. It is anticipated that a younger generation member will use the property as their residence. The Family is in a transition period between generations so no decision has been made as to which member of the Family will live at the property. XI USE OF THE FACILITY The enclosed tennis court is strictly for the Family and guest use. There are no plans, or desire, to mal<:e any commercial or corporate use of the facility now or in the future. :*♦ The applicants are willing to make any provision, either in the ordinance granting the special use/variance or in the chain of title to limit the use of the enclosed tennis court to strictly private, noncommercial use. TDA/c 4/6/87 COVENANT i , ' . V. 1^; This Covenant is f ^artnlrship rcraigbank") 1987 by etaigbank ASSOClat ,^ ..city"). and given to the City oi Rocitles A. craigbank ^^=°“®^“ract”oriand'‘loca?ed\n ‘'the%^ Minneso- °trCo°u^ty r/rennerin^^W of Otono. iegaiiy desettbed as. ^ ♦-ho SouthGoGt QusrtGr (NE Part of tne ^ °“Three °3)! Township One Hundred1/4, SE 1/4) of section Three ^^g) West of the seventeen (111) North of Range^Tw^ y^ Government "sirvey as follows: Co-enc^ sE 1/4), Northeast Quarter of the Soatnea Northeast Quarter thence East along the Soutn 1/4), Nine Hundred One of the Southeast piint Four Hundred Twenty-nine(SOI) feet more or less to^a point^^ Southeast Corner of and five tL Southeast Quarter 1/^, S said Northeast Quarter ^ left at an angle of 124 58 1/4) thence deflecting i- nno Hund"^ed Two (102) feet; from'the last described course „£ ij- from the thence deflecting ’"pijty'^'jso) feet; thence diflecting to last described course Ftfty^(uO) described the right at an angle of 15 ^ing to the right at an course^ifty 1^0) feet; thence ^®“f,“S%ourse One Hundred 11® 45’ from the last. aes>^i-j. anqle of 3 aOO) feet; ^^i?ed^course One Hundred (100) feet;SO' from '-..e last described course u ^ thence deflecting to the right^^^^^^^ ’^^n^last 1-he* last described course u 41' from the last defeating to the right ^5/" Whence deflecting to describedTourse Ninety-two (92) feet,^^ described the left at and Five tenths (180.5) feet to a point in the mke on said property,Northeast Quarter line parallel with said South Eight Hundred oHhe southeast Quarter NE l^E^l/ »feet more Seventy-two and Seventy-fi thence South along the of less to the «f ^ Fortr-f°ur and Eighty-five rundred?hsT74l 8sf feet to the point of beginning "Property"). ' B cra-gbank desires to build an enclosed bannis^couit^^on^^^e S°^ordlr;aritery”rror^tL-^rrrsidential structure on the property - 1 o- Craigbank does hereby Pov\^‘‘® structure to the main residence at 1700 Fox Stpet, Orono, known as the enclosed tennircL?t i onTv^K ^ commercial or business manner, but shallonly be for private use; and fun-h^r shall sL?rh subdivided that said enclosed^?ennirco«t residence, or if subdiiider tennircour^with^tr"’’®^ ’"° include the encloseditself o? residence and never alone, byitseit or with another parcel of property. ^ CRAIGBANK ASSOCIATES, a Minnesota Partnership W. Duncan MacMillan, Partner John H. MacMillan III, Partner eby sed ;ner ilFowler Hanley Inc Engineers-Architects MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Fire Protection Water Supply System for MacMillan Sports Center, Orono, Minnesota PROJECT; 87003 Phone conversation with Don Egan of Eagle Fire Protection Company. _ • « ^ 1. 2. fire protection water supply. a If the fire protection system is as per the lasting a duration of 30 minutes would be required. b. Don asked if the hydraulically ^°^e!°’"Doerthe protection could be used. Ye , p -rfarruirements"^city have any special fire protection system requirements. No, only the code governs. A hydraulically designed system for a 15,000 s.f. building should meet the following: ”!''®L"abli^; supply 160 to 165 gpm for a duration of 30 minutes. b. Needs a 4800 gallon water supply.APR 01 RElTfl d. The tank can be located inside or outside the building, below, at or above grade. e. An underground tank ®similar to that for gasoline storage tank. f. one possible storage tank size would be; 6' diameter x 30' long or as calculated per the following formula: (.7854) (diam.)2 X (length) (7.48) = no. of gallons. BY: Robert J. Johnson 1207 Harmon Place . Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 . Telephone (612) 332-8728 MACMILLAN SPORTS CENTER A. Sports Center 3/16/87 B. 1. Area =1st Floor 2nd Floor Total - 11,880 s.f. 4.270 S.f. 16,150 S.f. 2. Height = Maximum - 40 ft. /2 stories 3. Occupancy ~ B-2 — recreational facility. 4. Exterior Building Materials = (a) Roof - Slate or Asphalt Shingles (c) walis^-^Burnished'^or^Decorative Concrete Block (d) Windows ■" Aluminum Frames Caretakers Cottage 1, Area = Upper ~ 780 s.f. Lower - 3 8 0 s. f._ « Total -1160 s.f. ~ 3fi0 s.f. unfinished b?.''ement Total -1520 s.f. 2. Height - 2 stories 3, Occupancy - R-3 4. Repeat #4 above except windows. Windows are wood. TO‘: FROM DATE: James Grabek, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator March 11, 1987 SUBJECT: #1119 Craigbank Associates (W. Duncan MacMi1 Ian) ,1700 Fox Street - Variance and Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing ZONING DISTRICT: RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential LOT AREA:Approximately 13.5 Acres Dry Buildable APPLICATION; .7 • Use Permit for Detached Caretaker House perZoning Code Section 10.20 Subd. 3(G) ^ . . ?Lconstruct caretaker house and recreational facility structures nearer front lot line than principal residence per Zoning Code Section 10.03 Subd. 9 (D) ^ construct a caretaker house and recreational facility structures, both in excess of 1000 s.f. in floor area per Zoning Code Section 10.03 Subd. 9 (C) ^ 4) Variance to allow recreational facility structure height in excess of 30 feet per Zoning Code Section 10.26 Subd. 5 (A) PERTINENT FACTS: « K, ,i’ The property owner, W.D.MacMil la.., is represented by James McNulty (McNulty Construction Co.) and Edwaid Hasefc (Howard Dahlqren Associates, Inc.- planning consultants). 2) The request is to construct a 1,200 square foot caretaker residence structure and a 12,000 square foot "sports center" recreational facility for the private use of the MacMillan family. The sports center includes an enclosed tennis court, whirlpool and sauna, workout room, golf room, game area, kitchenette/wet bar, mens and womens restrooms, four garage stalls, plus an outdoor patio area. 3) Issues identified by staff as being pertinent for discussion include: A. Location of structures in "front yard" B. Visual impact on neighboring properties C. Height of recreational facility (40' main ground level to I'.-' " peak, 33' avg. calculated height) D. Degree of private controls on use of and access to recreational facility E. Floor area of the structures related to concerns regarding potential for future commercial use of the recreation facility (commerical use is not proposed or to ^•T«] •lAi* r 1 roii0«] RHlC ^Til vy Zoning File #1119 Nlarch Ilf 1987 Page 3 of 5 Staff feels that there will be Vails and^^h^ubbery neighbors, and with the unli^eirtheyVill ever see thescreening of the parking lot, it is unlikely rney structure. ^ screening is maintained. Item C. Height «rh\gfarthe peak Hoi;ver, the peaWrecreational structure is 40 hig^ ^ ^e Se^ghhor's garage h “nce il likely will.not appear as an unusually high structure rrom the neighbor's viewpoint. Viewing from Fox Street, .V*®jl,®^“i3t\nVt?re ’eninrb'^^^^^^ irnf^anVtear^^^s^m^aintS, "liref^bl frra-Tox ^St^eet^'Ye^ing^ t^the northwest. The structure height *ri'th<^gh°not a factor hlreV ’is° to^T^tec? wh^^^ ^ComXsiln^^^ vegetation on the site, i"®” a i-c enof'ific conditions attached variance is in as to rhl”ex\"lrior cl^\r"V ma^“^' the "structure , so that perhaps screening is less critical. Item D. Degree of private control of and access to the recreational facility. The MacMillans are proposing as _a pr^va^te ^fac^m^^^ use of family members and guests. commerical allow it to be) open to the Public- a„d it is not located on purposes. You will note that the ««baker s^^rejijlenc^^ the roadway which provides ^^cess to t control over access to is a contcious effort to maintain a g . . likely to visit the facility so that the general public will be loss iixe y the site uninvited. Also no^c that the recreational facility is from the Street, again a deterrent to public traftic. 4->i4t ci-hructure - concern regarding Item F. Floor area of the structuxe potential future, uses of the structure. Zoning March 1 Page 4 S 0 I s.f. in iarge a normalii structur Code and those ur high pot zone. S t a impact c construe ^esid ed change, t has a poi although" Plan the recre should be put condit Item F 1. serve th site. t frozen g Survey i "Kilkenny soils ge water ta; existing the propc probab sites I testing treatme and alt for the but the south ti V ehic1€ wheel r applied! ii. WATI that because K.jsr Zoning File #1119 March li, 1987 Page 4 of 5 r Section 10.03 Subd 9 i • . I«rge"ac%e%%°if/^tti4°ne for'a 1000 normally visual Tx, f garaoec; ckI^ * ,. * ^^sthetica 1 Iv structu/es"re\“/oors^rar/"^/‘'^"“^l oeighX^^^^^^ no^ deration ir. a residential C 4- ^ ^ i? « _j ^taff }fjould 3q1t • impact of alir.,,* ^^ianning Commis<?i r>r, *. constructed in a i2,000 s.f. recr eai-’°n future resided in Or^^no a ^one. f-cility to bl change, this structure"wiu"'?i?"? do*^ n^ot ” ant^-^ au\o%g^1(^l *n:t\\e“^^'’ - a c-1e^r"cifi^=/a/r°/ar""^a°t the owner's intent. ’recreational facility .-K„ planning Commission sh...,.., __ .. siJIu N'a "p-haps""c^onS" put conditions on the^Vprov ‘/^^‘' “ a var/at; rtg^^est°,""ytVc°a"^‘ Item p. otilites -ailahle togi". - - -i soV'’'/"'’r..^°?- and%\” ‘-i: JP„\la on_ the suf e’^ot 1?%""; i survey ViTh indicator th"“" revi°e"„|d"\^^^^ <lua i"; Kilkenny" loams and clav °" ^he site oo^-=”®r"' ‘1°- S01..S generally hav < sl^oi^"'® relatively steen niainly of water tables, often ^eon®Percolation rg-L slopes. These existing residence use^i^^^V*’® “®a ■"oun'd-tvot high the proposed access dri^^atem located adjalenr^o/'fi'^a (th. probabl^^^h^*^^^^^^^ ^^^t given the si^o • sites migi;;t"not''be^viry‘^cf'^''^^®^<3 sites can^be ^/ound ^ testing and design work Proposed strut'^/ treatment needs will he ^ ^ needed to asmir-c» Careful 3nd alternate si-f-o met. a separate svQf-om u that the sewaoe for the existing reKden^'*^^^- structure ^ ^°^®fructed but the proposed is apparently in i f*, ®^^sting mound south to avoid It. 5-"’^st be reioLt J condition/ vehicle has alreadv /‘^‘’ance of that syster(nof°e ^urtheir wheel ruts over its ha='^^" right over the "oo of appears a applicant plans to^replIL'th^^® ’"“®h "°h be'uLd^as'^-n"'a°“"^replace this systemTT"' access unless • • =>*i. anj IS not J Zoning File #1119 March Hr 1987 Page 5 of 5 strictly for single code purposes, and con^ercial type of must be provided with ^ sPri"^l®^ «^11 and water storage facility. likely conJct Building Inspector Tom Jacobs Applicant IS aaviseu concerning this requirement. SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND STAFF RECOMMEHDATIONS A. Staff recommends approval of ,^®^^®'^gJ?fjJa°£ront __yard recreational facility and caretaker house ^ the distance of Trea, given the "estate" principal residence and the yard ^.S;%ro7"re%rrncipars\r^Ture ac'ting as the functional front yard. B. Staff finds th®t given the topography^^existing^ Sri"l°lf im?e or" n^o’ti^ual' impact on neighboring properties. C. staff recommends Phat, because the st-uot^u^^^ limitations in the “pri?te conditioned on Providingthat a height variance is appropri finish materials and ^/o"lo?s^^Tarro"ik^^ structure as unobtrusive as possible. an.. and the location of Phe caretak Planning Comm.ission may wish to !“k“hat"o“h«tcce«%ontrris"mig](t be proposed, if any. B. Planning Commssion , should f prohibits comiriercial uses. F. Staff recommends that recommends that separate on-site sewage treatmen ^y^^ ^'y^tems be provided prior tote sewage treatment "be provided prior to ihe'soil testing facilities. Secondly! staff recommendsfinal council approval of _ the Jac^^^ t^^ intefere with thefinal council approval of the f-i^ as tTnoV intVf;^ with the that the proposed driveway be re orincipal residence, or that existing mound ^^^^®^^ ® location. Thirdly, staff advises system should be replaced at fij-e safety will be required the applicant that a ^Ynd^^applicant should contact the Buildingin the recreation facility, and apput^ai Inspector for details. caie'k^r hS!s^" Ju\7eTrto\^h^eco°nd/ttr th- not become a rental use. ? f ♦ . • . /'v. '7 er? >• C- ^ /r. n, ■ t. ■A >,\ Vw I've- u-- - ( ll 1 • 4 I I !3 . \ V n. ./ ■ '" r-i vi^-' /5tJ S'C-aJ jX*^. z-7-cy ^''^A CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1700 Fox Street, Wayzata, MN 55391 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 03-117-23 41 0003 Please check one - Is the property X abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. 474-3271APPLICANT Construction Company ^hone (home)- - - - - - - Name James McNulty, Jr. President Phone (work) 339 0674 Address 2nd Avenue South Suite 650 city Minneapolis gip 55401 OUNER (if different than applicant) Craigbank Associates Name VV. Duncan MacMillan Phone (home)_ _ Phone 475-7500 Address Dept. 28 P. O. Box 9300 City Minneapolis,^^ip 55440 Date Property Acquired June 19, 1981 (month/year) I (de:i (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100,00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) __ _ _ _ $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _ _ _ _ $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule , PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY ^ ^ q • Present Zoning District ^ i-i- Present Use of Property Residential Other-'-,( specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Construction of detached ouildings consisting of Describe request in detail; a two bedroom caretaker residence, storaqe and a recreation facility including an enclosed sTrT^e tehni.s court and dressing room. This bulldihg shall ITS exclusively for tlT5''TjrlvatG use—nr—the propert^^^nor and shall not bo for public uco.-1_ _ _ _ ,i.xvdi,o use or rne r ^R^QDIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. (4^ Certificate of survey. (s7^ Construction plan, if applicable. ( sTj Plat Map.W The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature ft .1u.-Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees^jt/o this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. CRAIG^B-ANK ASSOCIATES y a.Q Owner's signature ^ J • ’ / Vyr^tncr^^^^ 2/11/87 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a L;cheduled meeting, to please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. •>#o d! to ^ M CL S LUcr IIIos £ lUJ K 10 ;>- CO i <£gu.z M H 10 M •J CO QC yj g“uiaou bo z Ma UI § CO N O ;5o ro ooo ro 10 CM I XN o^ u. CO 1^ < Muo CO 10 < CO UJ K < M CO CM CO CO < Iroo o o < < CD CO O O M M < < DC d: u u Ha liJ o o sf 10 O 10oro § CD CO o a a. £ CM O 0 z ^ -J ►- Mro CO CM 1 X o N O < •-« U. £ ^ o •J o o M n ^ c^ ^ 10 u X 10 -J *J <0 z lO -J ^ CM £ O O M M CM O O I- CO %o a d: Q. -J Cp •-« < < UI CL 10 O U U O £ ooo to CM I CO CM < Z H •J < CL •J ^ Ui M -J O £ M O 5 0 I lOo g < -J £ -J M U U CO o O Kl rs Nt to 10 {!! < < UJz z o o o Ui UJ N O -J a CL £ UJ 5o oo §•< 10 ( ff cr t « * •M4A- c^ooo CM h* ro CO CM J X N o^ u. >- UJ >- -J UI II •o UJ«o z Iro o o CM CO -« ro o >• n UJ -J •« § n I X •’So u co c^ro 10 10 giu.O o Z CM O eo DC •M o ooo •J < I- Ul CM ro CM ig o: QCS3 O to to lO Kco Iroo 55 M M Xou. ?!M M 3 3 o CO CO <r- < N >- < 3 (M Ooo CM H DC r- UJ p ro CO CM z < 1X03 O CL IP-4 U. o ^ c^ to lO to CO I < £ro 3 < O O M O -J -J €0 -J u. r- < O N €0 >• CO < ^ 3 P ^ a ^ ooo s. to CO CM I X h- o •-» U. Dr LM COz <z Dl UIa Chro 10 10 < X r-co Iroo to 00 -o o o >• >• < < CO CO o < U. H<c to Nl <o >- O < ^ 3 Ooo ro ro CM I Iroo M Mcr or < <55 < < V-co o Kl to to Xou. p to o o < < CO CO to o q:o i Oo CM<r ro CM I CO h- < g' 8 < S§ £ M O to to to oa: 1^ It. Itoo «• p z £ pto •« o -> -> § d: CO o -J- ;3 >- 1 i I r,-. ’C. . Vf ooo oo XuH<P i CM O O O H to CO CM I X h- O •-4 li. Ito o to vO pro o M M d: d; < < X X Nl N < < p c^ to if\ if\ X X Xou. c o < <t Z> 3 P P P N £ 8 o tt,o Ui d; d: £ IT o < q; P O Z UI < < >- \ or < p D. p a £ O o X:c < z O H i P ,'•1 ((c I* C ( I Sry2<4. crri'^2^ir^ Oc^^/-loHSS' - 2- €>6bC&^ /S(? ^ £ie^Ae4^r^ s '?^}t‘£ov^ fct>^-^ 'Ti4<^ or n-rer Po</^c>u^ax^ C tr>c^ C^ c^<Z— -r>4tr iP-^^'Gcr^rtsT^ . — "7^c;5/6 ‘f-> ^> aJ t v*^ » 4 *2-^ S fo.^'Tts /^<r f I'f rV — (Sc'' S'cn^^^>rnr S^ic^ rv6~l o^ i i • i fUr rlfic./’cjyzjTV ^ ~ ^^^C3i<s^ S'f^tC^-^L^ TOfi-^ /Ajro c^/^Si — /V/S^Z/^ft-yti: £>a*tM ” l/^-c.-'^z *“ .S' Av/*- * 4L_ “~ 1^<y-g* '*' Oa^^-itY hi /i^M /V/3rw4. Fudoo '::iO T-o ^^7ry2.'T-A'^Aj/AJC foTZr^T'lA^ op rVcr fc^ciLtrY S foXTS ( py^<L{UiT*Y /^Uds-r (},& /'/2CVxoeiib ujtrfi S‘Pi'^r^>^L€ySL 72-^- ^ iA^-e-iS-i. fOe-e-'i- • /^2<fV/cw -B'7^ I **V-V •■ ■ ,. ■ ;-’ajfcA , f it KOIL^ — #///? Of^ ^-frTT^JAJ. Co X SO^L Si>\^v(TY .* 14 d- ‘ / 2 ><, VP' ^ - S'LoC^'S^ /S’2^1 il 1^ “■ K>^€ - " COOn/^ C^C, - 6>4-t-nro co€T Si<-r‘f C/L^ ^-c^Avv^ /&' 2T '^‘=» SiX5Pt;3 % 30 >d VX t •Xo X |l s C'/'O TT^' /Xc-PcT<^Jr-y y*-y2.^ ^/S.^u^O^'^/aJ^’^'TuY k-iLVH£^i^'f -SCoPcrC /-ne-C^'-N. (o'-2.^ Vo , fidyL<i.C'LATlQ/^ A^<r OFTfe^ ^0 <:?/^ /r2<?au£>iyAj<s /^ou<A/£i> - -r^PcT tS:^ SYSTZrr^s. /#0 CAScS^ , .f^l-dPC ^ c i2,i-n cyjt\^ F’fi>CTO(l^ //o ^^cA*r?/^C> sy^ytt^s- ^ hf^c^ M CiF 17 m^ 3-6=% /s* f y^P/CJ<. ^oiL rro^r-^^ /s ; 7"-Vz ‘^ Y2^‘-6,0‘' c iofse <r^«r .A, r.. ! • i'il.-ia / '■ / / / 'V / / f ! f I // A- .n„ rjr' ™“™ ■““• »•’»Xil7 SHULL CONTINUED stored on the^sh^o'rellne'^ year and will not be stored in ?he ? "'°''ths of the sllt®f k°"h'’®' Applicant has adv\se^d^?^L^1-h‘’ boat lift and that dredgAq and fi 1 ff®“PP°'^t for a crushed rock is not acceo^able^hi^ ^ lakebed with constantly maintian *^'’® need to recommends approval f i n<n filling. Staff structure upo^the neighbors? °f the and^L^p^bf^^^^rf^rw^^cJos^"! -tter Jeco^lnd" approval per ?;aff Johnson, to to applicant not be?ng^?mlt?d °oTo"?»? more track footage is necessr/v0. ^ necessary. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays W. DUNCAN MacMILLAN TRnrPOX STREET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & VARTANrp* PUBLIC HBAHING 9s^ iSm" 3as notet''^’'" P“hncation and Certificate of Mailing McNulty Constructio?Compan?"an^^ a?®® McNulty of uahlgren Associates - pra?n7ng?onsurtants!*"’' rlqjls??o?Sn?rucf the residence and and a*^ 12 Vo?”,; "^^tached caretaker the private use of thrAacMill^n ^^^ter" for center includes an enclosed The sports sauna, workout ?o?m oTlf “hirlpool and kitohenette/wet bar, mens a?d 5e„ ^ame area, garage stalls, plus an outdo? restrooms, four ?°l“des a separate driveway access?h® P".P°«al Shared driveway servinq the Private Use Permit required for a residence. Conditional Variances required to* 1) caretaker house, recreational facility *structur^Q^^^ caretaker house and than principal resTdence* 2) and recreational facility ^itrSctur^^ caretaker house 3) to allow recreational ^^00 in excess of 30 feet T-otr- structure height identified by staff;* rewed the following issues b) v?o.f structures in "front yard" b) Visual impact on neighboring propLties ‘ I. r t 9i MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16, 1987 §1119 MacMILLAN CONTINUED c) Height of recreational facility (40' main ground level to peak, 33' average calculated height) d) Degree of private controls on use of and access to recreational facility e) Floor area of the structures related to concerns regarding potential for future commercial use of the recreation facility (commercial use is not proposed or intended, but a detached structure of this magnitude in a residential zone in Orono is unique) f) Provision of utilities - - On-site sewage treatment - Water supply (building inspector's preliminary review indicates the recreational facility will require a sprinkler system to meet fire safety code requirements) Mr. McNulty showed on the plans that there would be minimal, if any, visual impact of proposed structures from Fox Street because of the existing heavy vegetation. In addition, they plan to replace pine trees in the area of driveway excavation. Taylor felt it was near impossible to have no visual impact from a structure this size. He also expressed concerns regarding the effect on the residential neighborhood from a construction project this size. Chairman Kelley brought up the issue that the principal residence is a non-homestead property, not occupied by a family, and owned by a corporation. Mr. McNulty stated it is owned by the MacMillan family partnership. Bellows felt there were concerns with the intended use i.e. a large family associated with a large corporation and the fact that the main house is not occupied by a family member could be close to a commercial use. There was a big concern among miny of the Planning Commission members that the recreational facility and principal residence would be used in conjunction with the family’s corporation. Chairman Kelley questioned how a variance for an accessory use can be requested without the presence of a principal use. n staff advised that was a legal issue in which they would have to consult with the City Attorney. { - 4 1 MINwTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16, 1987 #1119 MacMILLAN CONTINUED As requested by Mr. Hasek, the Planning Commission stated that the following are their main concerns: 1. The main house is not a principal residence of any family member. 2. Size of structure, future use, screening & aesthetics. 3. How to regulate use. 4. Access to proposed structure should be from the existing residences' driveway. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to table this application in order for the applicant and staff to address the issues of concern; and until the legal issues are resolved. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. #1120 RICHARD W. RAGATZ 1945 CONCORDIA STREET VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 10:44 ~ 11:05 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Mr. Ragatz was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the proposal to remove an existing 14'x 16* shed near the road and replace it with a 22'x24' garage. This would provide the opportunity to locate the garage to meet the 10' side and 10' street setbacks, however applicant is requesting a variance to keep the garage 2' from the lot line and 2' from the street, a slightly better setback situation than the existing but not meeting the code standards. Applicant's stated hardship is the slope of the lot, however staff does not feel this hardship is valid. He noted that if the garage is moved to the 10' street setback line, a standard driveway will bring applicant's 75-250' hardcover over the 25% limit to approximately 27%. Mr. Ragatz noted a hardcover discrepancy which included the deck and disagreed that the deck should be considered hardcover because when it was approved to be built it was not considered hardcover. He noted that the hardcover amount is critical because he plans a future addition. Chairman Kelley agreed with applicant's stance on the deck not being considered hardcover in this particular case. L CITY OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN ZONING PILE NO. 1119 NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 3/18/87 TO Craig Bank Associates COPIES TO: W.D. MacMillan Department 28 P.O. Box 9300 Minneapolis, MN 55440 R. James McNulty, Pres. McNulty Construction Co. 400 2nd Avenue South Suite 650 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Edward Hasek Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban, 300 First Avenue North Suite 210 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Inc. TYPE OP APPLICATION: XX Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OP MEETING: 3/16/87 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Tabled: For reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS; Planning Commission tabled this application in order for the applicant and staff to address a number of issues of concern relating primarily to the high degree of variance requested and the potential future use of the structure, and secondarily to the site planning aspects of the project. Planning Commission also indicated that they did not want to review this until the ”le<^al issues are resolved". The following issues are perceived by staff as being of primary concern to the City: 1. The Orono Zoning Code requires that a permitted principal use must exist on a property before permitted accessory uses can exist. Because the existing residential structure on the property is not homesteaded andwas represented as being used on a transient basis by family members and guests, it seems questionable whether a permitted primary or principal use (namely a long term single-family residence) currently exists on the property. 2. This becomes a concern because of the substantial magnitude of building floor area variance requested (1200- 1600%). Without such a massive structure being accessory to a bona-fide single family residence, there is a perceived potential for such structure to become more than just a family recreation area. The City has legitimate concerns that the proposed structure has a high potential for commercial or corporate use not directly related to the long-term occupants of the principal residence Structure. ■> I N ■ Zoning Pile #1119 March 18, 1987 Page 2 of 3 Notice of Planning Commission Action • In e ^ J^ - * sports center a)"\llsKTsTbll ^“ake%™: ana fnnctlral%^ s"?S3“Z‘F “•‘» applicant might be appropriate, TeVrVn°i® Proposed by the 5. . ' l®9al, and enforceable.g P . ^c:ci JJXG# p“5£F"”""=" property is a oLVl"lnt?a"l?^ as*’°a"Vu^s^^ -s“d%:;?e,‘’rn"d Tp^t^ Tl p??nl?off"' indlcatirn":^ a\"f P>^°P-«y i^Vol betwe*:^^Vv, Property Thp a permitted iLoe rea-r">® high potential oi >^®latel “t'han''?\":s7dentia? 7se7^f7 example commerically or corporately ^'^^essory use, for (A) can be adeqaUly7tso7ved'^®th’'"'"?® hhe issues in the sports center perceptualIv site planning to make ^residential use of . ly accessory to primary concern. Specifics bri^?? Property becomes the Planning Commission include rcl nr-touched on by the access road to the facilitv elimination of thi principal residence structure^nV ^1 1 on into the center so that it is not ^,^ relocation of the sports principal residence structure. remotely from the { ’rr" ■ ■ i»'\ V Zoning File #1119 ~ Notice of Planning Coniinission Action March 18, 1987 Page 3 of 3 Procedually, the next steps in the process are; 1. Applicant is requested to please forward to staff a list of the permanent residents (if any) of the primary residence structure on the property. 2. Applicant should propose specific controls to the City Attorney for review of legality and enforceability regarding use of the sports center for residential accessory use only. 3. Staff will request that the Planning Commission at their April 20th meeting, first determine whether they feel there is justification for granting the variance to building size. If so, then Planning Commission should address what site conditions and/or structural design changes are appropriate to make the proposal acceptable. Thirdly, and this may result only in a conceptual recommendation, the Planning Commission should address what specific or conceptual controls they feel are necessary to make the use stay at the level intended. 4. Staff would hesitate to suggest that detailed site re planning take place prior to the April 20 Planning Commission meeting; however, by the same token, it might be fruitful for applicant to address generally what changes could be made to the site to alleviate the concerns in item 3) above. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as; Planning Commission April 20, 1987 Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the April 20 meeting is April 13. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. 4 « i w1: i. IV ;r--' i ■ >1*1 MHm > i-.*•-I »■• ■ . I .1 A T VV.v - J -t . TO;Orono Planning Commission FROM; MacMillan/Craigbank RE;Application for Variance Application has been made to the City of Orono to construct an enclosed tennis court on applicant's property. According to the ordinance the landowners must show practical diffi culties of a hardship in connection with the granting of the variance; that is, the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if under the conditions allowed by the official controls the plight of the landowners is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The applicants believe that they have several areas of hard ship which apply to their application for variance. They are as follows: 1. Because of the economic position of the MacMillan Family, there is a legitimate concern for safety and securi ty of family members. Recent events have shown that even the greater Minneapolis area is not immune to terroristic threats, kidnapping and other violent crimes involving wealthy individuals. Certain members of the MacMillan family are very private and are concerned with security issues when traveling in public, especially at night. The V* — -- - -- ■ - -- .... n*-mvC'AI TiTir -11 I I irTnTi tTTlr‘m'‘*Tfrrnfrit tennis structure would give them a secure place to recreate without the concern for their security. 2. As evidenced by the soil samples taken on the property the water table is very high. Several samples indicate that the water level is only 4 to 5 feet below the land surface. The overall height of the tennis facility could be reduced but for the level of the water table. The composition of the soil also dictates the location of the facility. Both soil composition and water table level are out of control of the applicants. 3. The main residential structure is French provincial in design. To move the tennis facility closer to or attach it to the main residence would severely affect the aesthetics of the residence and thus destroy the architectural integri ty of the building. Great care has been taken to design and landscape the tennis structure in such a way as to make it as unobtrusive as possible. To relocate the structure may cause it to be more visible from Fox Street then it will be in its proposed location. 4. Under the City Ordinances the construction of tennis court is a permitted use within Zone RR-IB. The size of a tennis court is approximately 60' x 120', for a total of 7200 square feet. It is impossible to enclose a tennis court (a permitted use) and have it less than 10-12,000 I \ square feet after takinq into consideration perimeter area needed around the court, changing areas and storage. 5. The Orono ordinance governing set back of accessory structures from the "front yard" is geared to the normal positioning of a house to the street, i.e. the house normal ly faces the street and is located a very short distance from the street. The ordinance is intended to help pre serve the character of the neighborhood as to not allow accessory structures such as garages, sheds, etc. in the "front yard" which can have a detrimental visual impact to the neighborhood. Here, the property is approximately 13.5 acres with the residence overlooking a small pond. The residence has its back to Fox Street (a full 400 feet from the street), and is barely visible from Fox Street. Clear ly, this situation does not fall within the original and normal definition of "front yard". The caretaker house and the tennis structure would be 125 and 150 feet, respective ly » from Fox Street. There would be no detrimental visual impact on the neighborhood by allowing a variance from the "front yard" ordinance. Landscaping which would shield the structure from Fox Street has been incorporated into the design. For these reasons of hardship it is requested that all needed variances be granted to allow the applicants to construct a caretaker house and tennis structure on their property. 1 1 K i i I We the undersigned property owners have reviewed the plans prepared by the McNulty Coapany for a caretaker cottage and sports facility on the NacNiKan/Cralgbank property. 1700 Fox Street, Orono, Minnesota: and would like to be of record as supporting the proposal. Name Address Date I ■■ •tk • . In 5fc We the undersigned property owners have reviewed the plans prepared by the McNulty Coapany for a caretaker cottage and sports facility on the NacNlllan/Cralgbank property. 1700 Fox Street. Orono. Minnesota; and would like to be of record as supporting the proposal. AddressName Date i! We the undersigned property owners have reviewed the plans prepared by the i': 4 McNulty Company for a caretaker cottage and tennis court facility on the HacMlllan/Cralgbank property. 1700 Fox Street. Orono. Minnesota: and would like to be of record as supporting the proposal. Address Date We the underelgned property owners have reviewed the plans prepared by the McNulty Conpany for a caretaker cottage and tennis court facility on the HacMlllan/Cralgbank property, 1700 Pox Street. Orono, Minnesota; and would like to be of record as supporting the proposal. Wc the undersigned property owners have reviewed the plans prepared by the McNulty Company for a caretaker cottage and tennis court facility on the MacMillan/Craigbank property. 1700 Fox Street. Orono. Minnesota; and would like to be of record as supporting the proposal. iii.illwVVx.<Py\mo Name Address Date Ig;- ; . '■ .^1: ■ ■ . , - ^ • If i^i»‘' We the undersigned property owners have reviewed the plans prepared by the McNulty company for a caretaker cottage and tennis court facility on the MacMlllan/Cralgbank property. 1700 Fox Street, Orono, Minnesota; and would like to be of record as supporting the proposal. ! I Name Address J if-' Date ^ '■ « • Ife , Sfe TV mm 1 We the undersigned property owners have reviewed the plans prepared by the McNulty Company for a caretaker cottage and enclosed tennis court on the MacMillan/Craigbank property, 1700 Fox Street, Orono, Minnesota; and would like to be of record as not objecting to the proposal. ‘//no /^y Date Pauline W. MacMillan Name 1620 Fox Street Address Orono, Minnesota PAULINE UocMlLLAN, JB« y Wtii:nii:r kaemiLAH Her Attorneys “in-Fact Under Inst Dated .10/27/7.6/ P • « . t 1 TO:Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning S Zoning Administrator DATE:April lOr 1987 SDBJ:#1124 James & Ruth Ann Lange, 4160 Forest Lake Drive Variance - Public Hearing Application - Lot area variance to build on substandard vacant Lot 4, Block 1, Forest Arms Country Club Addition List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Existing Neighborhood Development Review F - Survey of Lot 5 (Homestead Lot) Pertinent Facts: -Zoning District = LR-lB 1-Acre Sewered -Lot Area Required = 1.0 Acre (43,560 s.f.) Lot 4 Area Existing = 0.45 Acre (19,467 s.f.) Varxance - Lot 4 = 0.55 Acre (55%) Area of Existing House (Lot 5) = 0.40 Acre (17,400 s.f.+) Variance - Lot 5 = 0.60 Acre (60%) -Sewer stub is available to Lot 4. Lot 4 was assessed for footage and 1 sewer unit. $225 connection charge would be payable with building permit. -Applicants live next door to Lot 4, which has always been a separate tax parcel. The vacant lot is not developed and contains no permanent structures. It has been maintained as yard area. -At 0.45 acres and 0.40 acres respectively. Lot 4 and Lot 5 are typical of lot sizes approved for lot area variances in the LR-IB zone in contemporary times. -Within the immediate Forest Arms Country Club Addition, developed lot sizes range from 0.38 acres to 0.55 acres. -Review of lot sizes in the neighborhood (Forest Arms Lane, Forest Lake Drive, Linden Lane, Dahl Road, Windjammer Lane) indicates Lot 4 is larger than 7 of 42 (17%) existing developed lots and smaller than 35 of 42 (83%). In the overall LR-IB District, based on our 1983 study, about 3/4 of the developed lots are larger than 0.45 acre. ■1 1 Zoning Application #1124 April 10, 1987 Page 2 -Lot 5 with the existing house at 0.40 acres will be the 3rd smallest developed property within a 1000* radius. “Staff recommends that access must be to Forest Lake Drive, and at least 100' from the centerline of North Arm Drive. J i -Note that applicant has not proposed a specific site plan, but note the defined building envelope leaves an area about 55' X 130', ample room to construct a residence. -Hardcover will be limited to 35% in this 500-1000' zone, or 6,813 s.f. -Hardcover on Lot 5 with the existing house is now about 20% where 30% is allowed (250-500' setback zone). -The City Council over the past 5 years has consistently approved lot area variances for vacant separate lots in the range of 0.40 acre in the LR-IB District: 9-86 Maxfield 4175 North Shore Dr 0.46 acre 6-86 Glesne 1475 Cherry Place 0.64 acre 4-86,9-84 Clifford 4760 North Shore Dr 0.39 acreDenied -- 4-85 Hedlund 3990 North Shore Dr 0.22 acre 8-84 Howells 1448 Park Drive 0.60 acre 4-84 Smiley 2720 Pheasant Road 0.60 acre 4-84 Brockopp 993 Wildhurst 0.40 acre 4-84,10-81 Haapala 4015 Dahl Road 0.39 acreDenied -- 2-84 Fisk 493 Park Lane 0.25 acre ^ Variance -11-83 Munsell 4100 North Shore Dr 0.23 acre expired without construction 9-83 Caples 4798 North Shore Dr 0.42 acre 8-83 Bloms 4195 Forest Lake Dr 0.39 acre 3-8 3 Hommeyer 477 Park Lane 0.52 acre 6-82 Langhans 1374 Rest Pt Rd 0.63 acre Staff Recommendation ^ It would be consistent with prior Council actions to recommend approval of the proposed lot area variance to construct a residence on Lot 4. A recommendation for approval could also find that: a) The lot area of 0.45 acre is consistent with the 15 other developed lots in the Forest Arms Country Club Addition. b) The existing house on Lot 5 will remain with 0.40 acres and as such, meets all setback and hardcover requirements of the City. c) Lot H has been assessed for sewer and a stub is available. Zoning File #1124 \ Zoning File #1124 April 10, 1987 Page 3 combined with the homestead blt^ Parcel, never cSr ? Addition, whilh ^olatt Armscurrent zoning code. (Lots 1 and 7 ni Pnor to the maintained by the Forest Arms Cnni?°^ ,®’^® ®"d Homeowners Association as oarkland Addition dock. Note that Lot 4 i”allowed n ^oint useusage). allowed to join in that Joint Dock Appropriate conditions of approval are a= f t approvS%rtSe'’lub?irwlr\\ l:to\d ‘^ia?orl"°^""''°°^^"°" *’® linesY''® roa7ways^‘’log'llon ®<=u"<3Arduways, 10 along internal lot 3) Hardcover on Lot 4 may not exceed 35% or 6,813 s.f. ) AppXlCSnt XS Sc3vis©d nF ona 1^ with the existing house. ^ ^ hardcover limit for Lot 5 buifdYnTp™."^^ connection (plant, charge with withYuiTding^permitcurrent fee schedule. biifl^^rperYi'availability charge (SAC, with suggests it i^" apprc^plUteYo^ slopes toward Lot 5, staff drainage and ubr?i/y-eYs^emYnr|.-e7th\Y\rifYAYe-^0! . A • • 4 i , >% -* . jj.* -•» r s X >-uaua Kcc • a ^3'3 " b' / t*iTiju: *'.i .'f. *5^ .' 1 a' / * Fge j'/St’ //!<-., #-7t''?..■.. Receipt 1%A > >•!•»« Initial^ ^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Reieiai V«iance^Fee''$7S^C0°(no chanae%^^‘^^tional variance) ippuS„ application) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^/l(pV lZi£^-X,~r cl- Property Identification Number (P.I.D. )q-7„^ ,ox , , Please check one - is the property abstract or torrens? Phone (home )</7^ ^ n T -^A^kamiNic u^ahsig^i Phone (work)_ff74-(^<^oO . -- --ff!!!!:aT0W^A_r-^;_ I r' .. City:_l/Y\.',rrr.rN Zip, owner (if different than applicant' ;ho'n~e'~(h;;e"- - - - - - - Name3"i r\t\cr^ rvi\________ gnO^r^q Arrr^c. I City: Date Property Acquired - - -f5^.1^°_2°^|_also_own^the_adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY ~ Phone (work)^n -_ _ _ ___ _ _ _Zip: (month/year) Present Zoning District L.^~ I R Present Use of Property I ^krx/-,^ .. t. I Residential DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Other (specify) Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail •*77n P. ( i-n i i _-■^ ^ ^ nO)TiCi OM n Lnl VARIANCES REQUIRED _!S(^ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) \ MW y 4 ' A W* -»•? HARDSHIP £/v.'r.'./:a ,T '■A Describe undue hardship or practical it.TJ-7--X y. r‘"I 5y:i^:a^; ;r-g- > t I ^ ^ r f <(./ ^^ y ^^ ^ f" I A', . ^ V f {,i L,f , ™”SUAL PROPWTO'coraiHONS ------------------Describe unusual prooertv •;+-•• Code Requirements ; r v with Zoning required submittals 1. Completed Application Form .ach Of the 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations 5. Plat Map. remember that your^Ja?if^L°Ippiicati application. Please information has not been included^comolete if fh= .1 ------ Certification by Zoning Deplrtmenrtiilt ff]]fn9_0fficial's Signature __________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATDRE as required. complete if the above Variance Application is complete. - - - - - - -- Date requ^s^teV^y \he®Von^ing^Adminiltr^^^^^^^ information required or unusual expenses incurred in reviel o^this Inn?® \° ®n-a/°r knoVedge!”^"'°” and clr?lcVTo^TheTes?’^o1“h?sAe‘ Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE ™Sil;?Tze^s'’rVasoLble^^^ application and further agents* Commission members, and Council ope^y by City staff, consultants, tion and verification ol lhirrequest" purposes of invest?ga: Date ^ .„3c-) .f' 7 Date ^ -^a .J> 7owner'_s_ Signature Planning Co^ission ^ieting"^Vranni^^°c'^*’®-offices 25 days before'the third Monday of each month; Applicants ris?t°" are"^ held on Iht review meetings of the Pi nnnfrTf, ^t a 11 scheduled applicant is unable to attenra sched?,Ti"®^°''. Council, and? if an A ^tice ucc a Fee Feceipt ” Initials ir- ;:r ___er:the:Pact_Pee_s_ (Double -pTltl.ulnT""' PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address C- u.j-, . K Property Identification Number (P.i.p., Please check one - is t-hc. .. . . . ■ ^ or _Attach_legal__d_e_scription to applicalLI 177 °r ------ torrens? applicant required survey. Name D.. n _ . ‘ Phone (work)_S£^Address: i'i^a<‘ Phone (woric) ■ riljj__ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _City J) °"*®« (If different thm^^u"":- - - Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^— - - --- - -Phone (work)Address: City:ZipDate Property Acquired ------oot) also owTT^riTT I ------ ("onth/year ) PRESENT DSE _ _ Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ Residential —n'_ _ _ _— other (specify) description op r ^qtost - - - - - - - - -- - - variances REQUIRED /_ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other « Lot Width _ Front Rsrdcover Side Rear) /HARDSHIP enS^ent""ol difficulty resulting fro„, strict description op unusual property conditions cldrReauire"“".\r°P"""y Conditions preventing compliance „iWith Zoning required submittals 1. Completed Application Form names'” m' th^lbov” litt^wi^^ nrLt “n ’addreVs ‘l^ 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner mnci* ei*/-rT% • t • remember that your variance ^ application. Please information has not been incltdtdf complete if the above Certification by zoning Department that Variance AppUcatloris'compietr’' Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT' s SIGNATURE reque%'ted“bT\he®?o'^^^^ Information required or unusual expenses incurred in review all fees and/or the inforiLtion supp^td is ^Jue /n^ ^PPli^tion, and certifies that knowledge. ^“PP^ed is true and correct to the best of his/her Applicant's SignatureVa.^.^^y-K^ ci. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OWNERS SIGNATURE authoriz^e^s ^jfea^onable°entry ^onto\he^^^^ application and further agents. Commission members^ and by City staff, consultants, tion and verif ica2iSrol”hirreques“ purposes of investiga- Owner's Signature- - - - - -Z_ _ _ _~_ _ _ - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - Date Plliiing^Co^ission Meeting'"^*”piinnlne°r'''’®-'^^‘'' ^5 days before'the third Monday of each month’ A^^'ni "®®tings are held on the review meetings of Present at all scheduled applicant !s unable to attenrrsc\i°ra®^ Council, and, if an ments to have an authorized agent attend please make arrange- Building a zoning Office rf^ri^c\a%\""p1.i^"r ''t°o“th"e^"mlltL^. V % - 4k ^5^ II ■ %> ' ■ -rA *= . » r1 •f CERTIFICATE OF SURVK-/ Pr.porea for : RUTHANNE UN6_____________ \241 I ItGM DE6 cR)PT10M> lol 4-, Block I, fORE-iT COONTRX CLUB ADDITIOM^ Hfnnepin ^Ain^c^ota. A rea * y),aui v^ff. GENERAL NOTES It 939.7 Derotes iron monufTvenf Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Denotes existing spot elevation Denotes proposed spot elcvotion ^ Denotes surfocc drainage Dashed contour lines denotes proposed feotures Solid contour lines donotes existind features 939 Proposed top of founc*«t)on elevation = Proposed basemen* floor elevotion » Proposed garage floor elevation = BENCHMARK: ALL-METRO TAMn SURVEYORS 2340 Doniels Street Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph. 475* 1433 1 hffiby cfrfifj( fhol this lurvty, pkin or rtporf wot prepared by n>e or ur^der my direct luperviuon Of'd thol I om 0 duly RfQiitcred Lor)d Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesoio (~y' /i0^yCV /]• ~^hJ4.tTU DATE III 87 HEG NO I70^S SCALE i"= 30* BOOK (c PAGE 19 FILE NO. 87014-A * * I % FOSLO <St SURVEYORS 1825 HARRIET AVE. Sl^M ^MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA • • • fi[102?DI7Q(S£\7E ©P SUDEJVEV T„ Ecklund & Suedlund \cA «< <V x\^1 ® fjf* mis B(ii^nnm i X r<. 35,.'5^ 5^ lV-' r."3V Scale: V* - 40* w\\ I moNj^ t^lROUXl.S-'i '----- FORESt \ro H ^R.'slase LAKE drwe ' ' .rskC Description: Lot 5, Block 1, FOREST ARMS COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION. Iw h b C LO’T'. the boundoHes'or the*land*ah* ^ correct representation of a survey of Ih -y, fnereon. and ai. visib°Ie enc%=;:X^fVa^d tQXU II . ______|Oofed this day of To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 13, 1987 Subject: #1125 Charles Reid, 1400 Baldur Park Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Variances to side setback, hardcover to allow addition of living space and attached tuck-under 2-car garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Pertinent Facts: Application Plat Map Property Owners List/Acknowledgement Survey Staff Sketch of Proposal Applicant Sketch Regarding Grading & Drainage Hardcover Calculations Copy of Airphoto Applicant Sketch of Side Setback Encroachments Lot area 75-250' = 7,850 s.f. - Existing hardcover 75-250' = 36.2% - Proposed hardcover 75-250' = 42.7% - No change proposed in 0-75' hardcover (5.3%, all in driveway) - Side setback existing (west side at point of new addition attachment) = 7' - Addition will encroach less as it extends toward road, with 10' side setback on both sides at end of addition Discussion: Applicant is requesting variances in order to upgrade his residence, another in the continuing series of similar upgrades on Baldur Park Road over the past 5-10 years. I. Side Setback Variance. The existing house ranges from about 4' to about 7‘ from the lot line. The addition will range from 7' to 10' from that line. Applicant will have to do some grading and provide a partial retaining wall between the addition and the lot line. Staff feels this is feasible and will have no detrimental effect on the neighboring property. Drainage between the properties is a minor concern, and applicant plans to direct drainage from the roof along the lot line both to the north and south. i of ice, oad Zoning File #1125 April 13, 1987 Page 2 of 2 II. Hardcover Variance. Because the the driveway required wij1 increase percentage than has been approved for recent years. A summary of previous api October 1985 - Werner, 1408 Bald 36.5%. This was a similar situ, garage near the road. August 1984 - Ulku, 1416 Baldur 30,0%. Again, a detached garage percentage down. June 1983 - Sjeklocha, 1424 Bald 32% by resolution; however, that areas were considered as non-hard now at about 50% hardcover, even w December 1981- Posnick (Sadler), 1 1983) - 75-250' zone allowed was 2 it was approved with the considei for the driveway which would no knowledge that has not yet been ins property is about 37-40%, with att, The current proposal does not inc and staff feels that it. is not needed gi speeds on Baldur Park Road. There i hardcover" to compensate. The driveway shown on the staff sketch and still 1: decreased to around 41.5% by removal c house. The other option of course, is and construct a detached garage near decrease 75-250' hardcover to below 40% Staff Recommendation: The proposal is similar to other The hardcover percentage requested is approved level because of the attach approval. Planning Commission must find the variances requested, and should a approvals. 4^' tl I ^ ,•■ ■■ property location Site Address /l^/Jn., Pa. f. ^ J Sfg ^IBc <5-7 --petty ^-^entilicati:;;!;;;^— Please check one - is Attach 1 property _j^ abstract or Attach_legal_description to application applicant t^rncluded^on required survey. Name CV\A(?J,r’C P, R,o Ph°"e (home)_^fiTa' Addre^------)j£]ZLa221 Name Phone (home) Address:Phone (worJc) City:^_ _ _ _ _.-- - - --- -— Zip« !17^ , —(nonth/y032^} Date Property Acquired \/a aJ - - -elso PHBSENT OSE Op‘prop®w !!!;. .PffffIf of land^_ _ _ Present Zoning District (Z Present Use of Property ,_ _, - - --- - -- ^ -C?esidenti3K bbscription op reqtost other (specify) Descr,K= Estimated Construction Cost's ~ j~ sZa jAVARIANCES required __Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front o’o“tA~ —Hardcover Sid©----- _____ Rear) lAz±7 ’ey. hardship With 2on,„g 33--------------------------~ ------------------------—£:::1 < - uta j- ^ y--------•: ^ t^4r/c<g: required submittals completed Application Form - - - - - - - - 348f327r?/'^°'" obtain I’ “ - to e.cD OF tZ ' including hardcover calculaf fl- Piat Map. Iculations as required. remember ^that I^roperty Owner'musTT' Certiiication\"l"-n%-7e7a«”;^^^^^^^^^^^^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Zoning^Official's Signature APPiication is complete. ' wplicast-s'm^tom ---------------------- reque?t\/by'’‘-the®?on^i Provide all i f expenses incurred in rev“"*^®’'°''' ®9teos ^t(f°prv‘a?? required or irn i^”5°^^ation supplied < ®^iew of this appiicabio^ ^ ^ fees and/or knowledge. PPlied./s true an(^ corr^t tS ^^^^ifies that ^ ' / / ' his/herWlcof. Sl,„„„„ C‘l-^hU ^ '/^ 1 !,,sff..'.rs .... y/tfa ^ K^_/ _ T////.., g...., ;™r;ss“; tion and verificatir Signature ^ ffilicanrmusrhav?^l~rr^^^^^^^^^^^ -•^/^t'/ !f] lanning Commission aS^I CouL^* 7 ^^^ scheduleda schedniori ___^_. t.ouncil, and. i iLr crsu^t^a^-iirthis rec^st/^ jj purposes of investiga- n /yL^ A ^////.>-, teire„"ret?ln°/s"rf\i"?; "VpTr^-t'sTutt^i-.f/ti-Ss^^ Office Of th!rc\a^^^Uit-{,Pi£rnyt^^^ • Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (we) re/iriy <^ArJj'rA /^-f6 1 print name(s)] ~ TFrint address!- - - - - - - -~ have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ---------------- —1 ^—1: also referred to as Land Use Application No. _____. 1 I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that 1 (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. -7 Date 2-/6 -<i7 V'V 1 Date ■ I 4-ui have any information that may assist the City in the review of please submit your comments to the Buildinq & zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the^ scheduled meetin^ate. ^ l! \ ■f 0 :> Cu W.-rt-'./J // /’ 11 r:\>■■1 ‘ . ».r-v;•I t *. J V.. /J-'}.} J;t i-W-’ • * 2o.o^ MlSS5t:^_ii.o 9.t :.»t rr f . If'I,' m. M__i r>"**^*% *=* P ..X4 ^ I _e r?) !3 1 ;. .•'••■ A ^ ?.>—=> \ I'. \ i _ .» '*' ^ ’"■* ^ • ,..- «ir; ^ f BL e '>^\^5cw-p 5T/2.i^cfvy/'w^ . / yofr * "Sfm.r I •f>. f '\i 1. 1 fj AO -OCiATL'S IKT C.1^n/l',|f.rr,cunnrmLCUD DRIVE 041-3030 LANDSUnvCVCRS EDENI'RAIRIE. r.lA'N b53/53 CERTlf lCATE OF SsiRVEY S’jfve/ For: h 'j t- ! /CT / Eook -^* C / Page V # > ^4. \ \ . w . >• ‘ 1 ■ I {( J J \ \ / / / /t"* / / < J t V /oi 1h{ ‘ ■ / / ' • • t /.* ■ ' « \ i / r ^ ■% p- - /<y ^r •. • . 1 / / / •<2^' Scale I'^^o' <C Cy ■C' X •O 7?^)^****' ,.pr.«Mo.:on o» o ..nr,; c: tV. Kv.do,;,. , p / l) ' '.■ 'S ’ ‘ .rncoJ^m.M,, If cny. fr»m or on .ilrf .or.d. fc; .U. c> JiH kwlldlrj. «„d »^V>/ ' . -.. .-V ■.^.'. •‘v.-. ■iUk:-'.:, • ^■n•-y^V7''?■:^••■:. v V jV .... •.' . ‘ ^ ' ■ CARDARELIE & ASSO& ASSOCi’ATESrTNC. k t / C f'i/i'ifc'iii r T / T r ^ - TH !"= 2 o SITE f IM-*' #' i-^kesmore reg^ions; And hardcover , ••w "LR-1C^*'aND^®;?p‘, regulations for "LR-Ia- Within any "LR-U"'^ ^-AKeLo^'RRcfrTr^p'}"^’' "ER-lU", ■ .;?£S™b'El distance froVthe ^wl®, •<=° ‘he shoreliL and sdjacent and nearby lots. existing -residence build cov'er,°te:Br?i'"or ”"e nnxcKf'°7--, V5 w5thfn°/5o'\"o%SS*r ?V^"'^«'‘"°‘9trater"\‘Sr 25o""feet”f than 30« hard cover*^^®’’°tellne therl shalfVcover. hi ha°rd^crer!*^‘ fhlu°b^ ‘reVve°d “'luTout'?^'"'^^^^^^“t itrst Obtaining a Per.lt'^t'ortt%°o'n^?!? ’ hardcover limitations /-' \ \ 0“75' Zone 75-250 ' Zone 250-500* Zone 500-1000' Zone 25S allowed 30* allowed30* Hardcover allowed ^5% Hardcover allowed \ ^<pO ■‘A pU Area of hardcover in zone (sq. ft.) — X 100 = Percentage of hardcover inArea of lot in zone (sg. ft.)zone —-3r \ • \ '. Perpendicular^^thrshor^not along the lot line!^ eline. .l-O'',3t'C> f^OAi::. - 1) 2) hardcover review #1125 Charles Reid, 1400 Baldur Park Road about 10x20°’’Vortion*Sf'driv'e^vfa^v°°'^®?nn" ®^0 s.l end. (This Will reMainV ' = 75-250* - Area = 7,850 s.f. +/- Hxisti.nc^ Hardcovers oecJc (16x23) House (23 x12)+(24 x24)+(12 x12) Sidewalk (2x50* ) + (4x4') Entry Sidewalk + Steps Gravel Driveway Avg. 13'xl00' TOTAL 2,840/7,850 - 36.2% existing 75-250* hardcover 368 s.f. 996 s.f. 116 s.f. 60 s.f. 1,300 s.f. 2,840 s.f. 368 Proposed Hardcover! Deck (16x23) House Existing Addition (30x30 ) + (12xl2) “ i Sidewalk + Well Pit 1,044 s.f Driveway (40’xAvg.l7’)t(15’xAvg.lO’830 s.’f TOTAL 3,354 s.f. = 42.7% Planning Commission Chairman Kellev Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator April 14, 1987 iSubgect: ^ert^^Jharon^Ge^ 4300 Sixth Avenue North - Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) - Sidp \r 4Required =50' ^ ^ ° Setback Variance Existing = 60.6' \ Proposed = 28.6' Variance = 21.4 or 42% Lot Area Required = 5 acres Existing = 14 +/- acres Lot Width Required = 300' Adjacent to Public Road = 271 3' Rear Lot Line =655' i List of Exhibits \ 1 Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map ^ “ PJ^operty Owners List Exhibit D - Applicant's Addendum « ~ ^‘^^"O'^ledgement Form Exhibit G ~ Co''''''-} of Sharon Hills Plat 4/13/64xiixnxDit G Council Minute«; nf ll TK ^Barn 11/26/73 Approved Setback Variance for Exhibit H - Sketch of Barn f ” Septic Inventory CardExhibit J — Survey Exhibit K - Staff - Amended Survey Review of Application: SharorHi?!rP?^f-"°ots°2 In'd^"^- st cT r \“ithin the properties totalling apprLlmate:iy 3:S acr^?I%P'="°^^^ originalcombJned adjacent lands (Exhibit B) nf ^ ^ has acquired and legally time the Sharon Hills Lblr^ision was oiaTt°d“w®^'' th4area and 140 feet width (Exhibit P) tKo ’ standards were 1 acre in 3 satisfies the current five residence on Lots 2 and SO' side setbacks standard of 100- front/rear and feet from the west lot line Lot 1 sL®""’"!;®?,® setback variance of 27 for construction of an animal b,n:n. ’ ^ “tils (review Exhibits G s H) or hardships: (Exhibit D), he notes the following findings Zoning File #1126 April 15, 1987 Page 2 of 2 1. Existing interior layout of house would require expansion on north or west side of house. fseptic dr^infield serving the residence is located on north side of house preventing expansion to north (review Exhibit I - s-^-otic inventory card). no information as to the interior floor plans for the k"," U ^ of the well but the setback variance sought can possibly bo reduced by relocating deck along the southwest corner of the family room addition. The applicant should be asked to respond to this point• . staff would have no problem recommending the variances as proposed in setbacks of surrounding residences (Lots 1, 4, 5 & 6) within e five acre district. It is our responsibility to minimize the impact of variance applications and to ask for amendments of propose]s whenever it appears there may be areas for compromise. staff Kecommendd cion: To recommand granting a side setback variance of c?A feet to Robert & Sharon Ge.iiman for an addition to their existing residence located at 4300 Sixth Avenue North, based on the following findings: 1. The interior layout cf the house prevents expansion to the south and east. The septic drainfield serving the residence is located to rear or : orth of house. 3. The property was platted prior to current 5 acre zoning standards. 4. The surrounding immediate neighborhood of the Sharon Hills Plat was not developed at current five acre standards. 5. Applicants' lot contains approximately 14 acres in area, 180% more than required area. 6. The most affected neighbor has been made aware of the proposal and has made no attempt to contact the City within the established 10 day guidelines (see Exhibit E). This approval is subject to the condition that the drainfield area be staked and protected prior to construction. ■X % ’’ -V n rn; f f1 %'^-. •; I ■y^ * •O // r / i Date Roc*d y-/0’' V Fee ^/' / /y / ^ *________ I.V 'it'- Receipt Initials /.' CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $15U.OO ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address w^oQ r^' A,/I A'.-io I'f't Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) S/- / // - Please chec)c one ~ Is the property K abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey, applicant Phone (home) Name T5^Uov--f Go.r ro n n Phone (work) Address ; U^.rr: (^' A/ K/_ _ _ _ _ _ _CityZip:_Sj^2t£it. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: Date Property Acquired _ City: m3 zip: (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land mm mmm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Cir^ sM.D n Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost $__30TS2i VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2.Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including h.as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. ^ 5^-^- Applicant's Signature _ _ _ Date OfWNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this^ request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please ma)ce arrange ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I r*- ir o ST lA M CL w § KI UJ €C UJo K to (-< S. CM OsO o o 5K O §* UJ s B ?l33ss CO M < •-«(/) Ui UJ UJ 7 CO CO ^ S ^ UJ UJ ^ ^ro 10 .j ^ ^S55S5 S ^ X X CM o ^ o u U ^ *J o o o Kl CMI CO I o to S z ^— S'" 3gS e CL Q. CO M M iO tt X 2^ ^ O _ UJ Ko: c o o < a o g2ui< liSi U tt! it 7Z a de; < UJ DC X O < O Z <^ aCL UJ O ^ £§ X Oss c c c c I* c c 2 c o in fO M M Q. • ui Si I- LJ K V if N lO •s CM O 5o O O sa €c r c e cno h- q: 10 o M UJ UJ H H Z -i < M LJ ^ CO UJ u lAJ U. U. M tt O O I u . \ ^ f * Gehrman Animal Hospital..-■I P 12720 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 545-9161 r iEDW. GEHRMAN. D VM CHARLES E GEHRMAN. D VM ROBERT S. GEHRMAN. D.VM. K.R KIRCHGESSNER, D.VM. City of Orono Pianninq Staff 1335 South Brown Road Crystal Bay Mn. 55323 U;\ "nil! \ • I ii.i' mar I ,’1987 »;! . { t : ; UL ‘3/'ll' -1J I We v/ish to add a family room on the west erd of our home. Our plans are to t:ave the room the full width of the house (30 feet), and extending out from tiie house 20 feet. This will require we d i smant 1 e a pourch that is presently on the west side of the house. We wish to move this pouch out from the the new family room. Our bedrooms are on the e?ast end of the house and therefore the iiouse lay out reequires an addition to go west or north. The septic system is immediately north of the house and makes an addition to the north impractical. We need a variance of 22 feet from the set back requirement. We would remain 28 feet from the lot line. 5incere1y, Robert and Sharon Gehrman ) U» t ^ r 1 ^ ^ I y’’ V-• ^1-. O I V- I . CS: I S' H *b ‘ . . . .I 1 ^ y— ft c£ p pc! i I 'i -- r/^ A^yv.* / / n « I ; * ..n 4 ♦ • i r ^* * f- ‘ %. * V k f . €u Adjacent Property Ovmers* Acknowledgement Form I (we) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvemert or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the pro posed neighbor's project or use requires City Council approval. Date A roperty Owner 'A ^ ^7 Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. i i ■i. i '% - .» : V • • 9* X »• \‘r ’ r : k ‘ ■ • Si' • V ' ' ♦ t f i. I' V;; •1' >■» . »p.w^t —*■-»■ a. -jx-tl nw • • ■ •» ♦ • * ■• *-»• ■ « *:,.4 I • ? llXinJTiSS OP A EiiOULAHVllSiX COUIiClL, VILIu\OJ 0? ^r;Q.;0 ^ rr.?i A"? TIP* VltltAG^ IL'wLLg ^APlilXi 15 #19^ \ * V f ^ , * -• Pransol, C. li* and .-<» J. uCiinitw , \ » r •. ■ ‘’r . « I 0 ' ; .. '1 ' ^ i*/l niinJ2 a“ SLrorttdt“lhninS?oS‘’o? r^o|iiSr"roai^“ fc?W l£?ch 23, 1964, «ei'0 >'“='1 flU3i)IVIwI01I « nOPJUO • UL";yj.H3 st,ss*.S'i;.srs sJ.ffiKsi.s.!”'-*' S UBDIV2SI01I SKAECn HILLS ■ ^9 / novca final ai>proval of auiaivlsion Slmron llillo ' ( { KiS SStlorSao oooor.aU by liuaUy ana earrlca. ' (..\r^ BIMIO USMOKO - ttSaSBI VACATIOII \ Tho 1 toy or oimounoca that ^rt^of Saycata^cna public hourlnc ca ^j'^'rtf^bo Plrot Subdlvialon- lulcoDhoro Eoad, cJiS dlopluyoa ariUdavlt •;»s:;.;s :f S4935 j^. iSc rcSolutlon and novod Ito aaoptloni . « UQOolutloa //46 •t % * * . ^ i * \i- A nooolutlon Vaccitinc Tart OS V/ayauta /jitl lalccDhoi^o lie; ad » f ^ >t t i.' • t ,•(Goo Ivooolutloa rdooh ~ Var^o y^) . suo motion for adoption vffio ouconaod by Quady and carrioa, Oidjil DID3 '» GTIlHKT lLMnTi-HAiiC.J ItoTivHIALu r -t ' Ir ' ! .:; !, 1 f. If «: • r \ ► ■*. • • •:;Ji I'lo Uayor announood teat t'.ilo •'{?»,.^l^oo^mutoiit’la oSSnlns biao for otroot, a°““V'tr^^dvt-StiUn nt‘‘foS bido end of) udvSrtlooa, The flcr;: road t >o m vtrtintja^nwor^ official aiupluyod uffiduvlt of ‘■:'^P?'-'''*“’™"^.,rUa^roaa aloud tUo blC;J. S’u,U'tS!'US;':ril"lSSlSa S;;f.;l'doSatlon^-,n.rav.arS of bldo iaitld n X il.6'r d'ltOo t * {*• * "m % J .femarfcx:^j:ir>.-K'^ kA . i QI - ■•T• . .•iw»«* ifc*»^nia»iti •••»• •* • V .1': . *-.MIKUTES OP A nnCULAR HEETIIIR ilELD IJOVDIUER 20^ 1U73 I**-- . • V-!' ' • * t • .* *» # *•i-. ’ifololi inovca, Butlor cccondcd, to approve tho vQTiaiico of Robert Gohrnan, 43u0 Sixth Avenue ilorth. Motion, Ayco (4) - Hayo (0), i ' . • • • 1 t‘ ^ V V *. ^ ' 1 I *. .•■.; s- t { i »>•., . i ; ■ ... * *• I 1 i h'; si • 'J. / % :| H It i- Tho Villago Adniniotrator aokod tho Council to delay conoidoratlon on lot sizes in uiuT-oUorcd areas until a lator Council LUO ting. Butlor moved, ifassongalo seconded, to porniit :Ir, Lloyd Urapor, 3955 V/obb Street, to move a l:auDO fro;.i lidina to tiio site in Orono, subject to ccnplying to tho nci/ ordinanco uaich tho Villoco Council passed this ovciiinn coacernlnn the noving o£ houses into end out oC tho Village of Orono. Motion, Ayos (4) - iJiys (0). iiasscngilo noved, Butlor cccondod, to approve tha luilding pernit and grant o varlonco to the r.oratoriuLi to tho Von Eci hliout Construction Co., 2075 Webber Hills Road, subject to tho ongLiccring firn of McCombs-Knutson opproving tho final dosicn ond installation of tuo septic systea and that tho sontic system bo designed for a oiniLial oporatioh of five years. Motion, Ayos (4)- Kays (0). 'kssongale moved, Butler seconded, to grant a building permit and grant a variance to tho noratoriiMi to Gary Krlnmol, 960 Parto^wood, subject to tho ouginooritig firm of McCombs- Knutson approving tho doslgn and installation of tho septic syotcu end that tho septic system must bo designed for a minimal operation to last for fivo years. ?totion, Ayos (4) - Kays (0). VAUIAt^CB 4300 Sixth Avenuo Kortn uKSEunncD areas 'I- ' ‘'r' liUILUlKG MOVIKG PErJUT 3955 Webb Street .* t: >• t , i. '' I . A* I ' . . 5^ S'i .V- BJILDIKS PEIbllT 2075 Webber Hills Reed I. (• i.O IlG CS©'- Ui’flCID » f• * BUUaXKG PERMIT 060 vartonuood •• '• . •,'i! > 4 'it •.’vfr Butlor moved, .Masoongalo seconded, to include tho liquor request in tho public hearing to bo conducted by tho Planning Comr.iissloa on Dcccr.bor 17, 1973, concerning tho request for a restQurnnt appliention that 1ms boon presented by Hon Hooloff and Don Zeanchock. It is tho Council's desire that tho Planning Coinlssion not only conrldcr tho special uoo and Iniilding permit tnat in presently before It l)ut tho isrur nco of a i icpior license in all zoned .iT<ari as .’lotion. Ayes (^) - Kays (0). I'UDLIC nilAUlKri PATiJ Liquor Request X ^ S 1 v.‘ V .Vv 0 ’/-? •*. .. ?•.*• •'V Z- ■ ■ i - • 5r * ‘ •}•V:1 f f t H • • \ * \ 1 *.V ' "* . '•• % ‘ * W • • 1 . \ \ O O CO Qi O CXI <X> ^ »«•. “T* 3 — *o -1 ►— O to CO Di O ZJc f-f O) X oo ZT O) 5: •-• to 0) -5 r* -u rri 2Z O •— Z3 Qi Z3 Qi f£) “0 IQ 3 —.3 3 *^D CJ -j X- to O) 3 0)o “S to X- CO 3 3 rx> to O CD • O r- 3 Qi or 3 Q CL - to COc oo•n i«—I ►—1 3o 1 Sf\5 3 to r3* ''D r3* •—. 3 f3- <D 3 <T> 3 CTi II 1 CX) —* O O r3 3 (Q -O lO d . 3 3 Qi 3 vO ^ ZT 0) O <T) • O to 3 to ►— c 0) to 3 o Q 3 3 0> r3 3 O <T) Qi. 3 O *-*• r> O) O’ oro 3 r-t- O X O) I— O) to*o 3 < O) o o to C3 XI O •5 O ID Cli CZ n 3 3T-0 3 O O) 3 3 r-^ O 3 -ti 3r— ^o — Qi \ C3m X CD to • O to 3* O o o *• CO •• o 3ca to ^ IT O — o o 7C r> O ►-». Qj O 3 <3- O ZT "3 to r-fzr — rt) to oo. 3 f., Q> o 0 01 r3 c "< CO __ZT -i. Di i'2 S 5. -3 Oo n> 3 3 O ^ S" ^ 3 ^ ^ r3 t/)^ • O -3 CO O) CO ZT C 3 < Ci *y 3 '< r3 3 Qi •—. to i\> Cl* •• r» O r-t 3 Qi Cr CO 3T D ft) ZT 01 O d 3 Qi *3 3 O 3 • , ,r 4.-4 To Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator April 14, 1987 Subiect: #1129 Todd Waters, 3061 Casco Point Road Varianc© — Public H©aring Antillcation - Variances for hardcover, average lakeshore setback, structure in 0-75' setback; request to relocate municipal sewer line. Zoning District - LR-IC, *5-acre sewered List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Application Property Owners List/Neighbors Acknowledgements Hardcover Worksheet - Verified by Staff Survey - Existing and Proposed Survey — Proposed Configuration - Outlined Pertinent Facts: Existing Proposed Required or Allowed Variance -Hardcover 0-75' 75-250' 7.1% 28.1% 12.3% 30.4% 0% 25% 12.3% 5.4% 250-500'12.0%12.0%3u^ -Lake Setback 59'54'75'21’ -Additions in 0-75' zone consist solely of deck. -Average la.eshore setback e about «;;it\ra;rt^:^0§“eau%-tron"rn views fron, the southerly property. That house is back about 160' from the lakeshore. Discussion: ’■''I '■“i’ciuorol the°*'sUef Unt"tha“Lrr7ntTy would have to provide the ^ would be done privately and "as-builf drawings upon would neerto obtain a temporary at the to the south, and would likewise h^re^t^pr^ovide tr?L^C?ty a 20- permanent access and utility easement centered on the new pipe location. ■% 1 & m M Zoning File #1129 April 14» 1987 Page 2 of 2 The proposed addition more than of the house, with removal and ,» to 30 4%^hardcover. I would notefora net 75-250' increase from 28.1% up to JU.4» na^ ^rproxfm"at°e%r"alLg “S^s%\^wn on t^ £rrr; towards the rear. , , • a-v,« rv-T*;« 7one will not cause any viewThe proposed deck in t ^ ground level, but is considered ^a^hfr^oreV thir Uk^i^ju"nb"rafel tfll' b^^ri^Se^.^^'^^licrt shofld''\d^dr“s%'' ?he n^ed for this deck and present any hardships that justify its approval. The view linesirtrre^iatiriVLfrck^frirtriak^^^^^^^^^ i;:ire"of^^^rprop^^^ar\^%^"h%Ve^rt^S^^^of this Iritin,. staff Recommendation: staff feels that the increase zone drains is not a ‘’o°75f®ae''ck''addi^^^^ is harder to justify given the drainage toward the 1' <e the only justification is the approvals of The average lakeshoie setback variance location of the existing •terms of feet of encroachment past the should ?frms of actual encroachment on neighboring average setback line, but in term ordinance. Is the view encroachment views, given the inten ° ^ approval or denial of all or parts of thf raqufsf sho^ld^S "\h^"harXhfp"s or lack of hardships that support your rocoininGndation. ....,. -1 $ ^ Date Rcc'd Foe ^,/.C?c)c> ifr,W- irf ,-fl. |_uJI^L> _|-Z. ^'^;5T CP /^ i ^yxt.al|^r^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Tnitial ADDlication Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Rental Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address '^OCz ^ Property Identification Number Please check one - Is the property (p.i.D.)w/7-^c^n abstract or X" torrens? Attach legal descriptionjo_appl_ication_if_not_i^ Phone (home) *47/'*APPLICANT Name 'l^PlPO l/jATiO^^Phone (work) Address :FT-KP> city:_^5^A^j^^- -ZiP- OHNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Address: Phone (work) City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) description op request Describe request in detail Estimated Construction Cost $ '1^0,0^^ variances required Lot Area Lot Width Front _ Hardcover Side y Rear)Setback Variances (._ _ other '.i I I *• -—--——^—— #-*%.•• # *HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict \ enforcement of zoning regulations: £yi*±?< l^GSr4l^E£Kj^45" f L/^l^j=LfeVArr<?T^\aI^>laU^^ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements t 7^7^_ _ _ _ _ __ •HI mm mm ^JOQUIRED SUBMITTALS Ql^Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain ^^this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^5^ Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. CT\ Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. (^5.^ Plat Map. rwt- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date- - - - - - - -- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. y' / // Applicant's Signature yj6^//_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _- - - - - - - - - - OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ ^ 4.wThe owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and rurtner authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of thi.s yeque^t. . Owner's Siqnature ^-// 1/- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -^- - - --- - - --- - - - - - - - - - Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Comiitission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■ *i ;o / c mm TJIT„ r. s. . '.200 . •••• \^’**'**l> .S ibdivilion . !>Ov®\Spring|Porl< Lo»t 0 200 (MiC •j • *.••••V” ’■■• •••.'•■’•r'vV •**• * -.r. :. -.* :*• -'••VvM ^'r I••• ■• •••«.* f • • V \1 hj •.. - * •••:•: . \ \ . •*oif ^ •V *•. . . . ^ .< \ *\^ ■“•’••••.l****\-\/••• *.• •• I •• •* • % > V' ■• ••••. .J . r-;. / • • ••• •• ••••• •^ *‘.::* ’••.* . ,v>x ..»r \ ••• . -V, ; v\» -v-WiVAN •••• \':m • • SHC^hfcV I v' Xflc>>t 'm T \\ ^ I *1 ■I I "HP"I' O K)o Ma k“- I lu 0: N CO Oi o lU !2 OC 2 ( ro Soo 10 s o K> CM ro Ifl in N < uj uj o Z»-« (J M M u S 7 gg"’ o CM _ _< < <<Uh- in -J < ^^ in No o o »-« >-m o <e a tt n 3 a Si10M lUs§LU £5M < K> O \CM U iU I CO r h* < 5 •Ml u <^M O o o §LU O E“ M S ?I M hOPom3 a mIU CD Ou I O CD CO g CM Q!IU COo Kl O h- (o 3 < QglSlX o a: P fo o ( / • oott o o M O IUm o N CM u KI CO o < o »H o o 7 “SI O < COCM in M CO tt Z o o X .CO ro -I o o ^ m o CD •) to 3 So o M;cs IU Hco Ia IU to O MCM U CO I CO < < z CO^ U IU H «« I COo a o CM m CO o c^ romm ooCO < z in«• X O CO m o -•m o -> n in t inoo o oa m 5Ms •J <HLU ott s CM I h. o l?( 3 i§ls ^ ^ ^ ui LU ^ “o nI o CM inO' om o CO COM M K- ►- sgo u os<u <H mo oin >• C. •- ►:r.4 oCM 3 o o m M S a3 m CM I ouCO <o >- >- <<LU LU Ms M4 -O -> oa o CM in o CO K> tn o Z ZLU IU >>LU LU I-H CO CO ®g O3 O o <fin m CM I Ch in in in Io CM ^ z zM O O O p CO CO 3 &3 3LU IU LUSistCO LU IU IU < X I >- Zu< £IU LU lu 3 pm 3 •D O O O 3 3 -«m ^ <t in O X X CM 3 < >• 3o 3 oIU < >- \3 < lu 3 IU a r:o z X < 33 3Q S S X <|2 = o o o LU IU »U XSSgS£ 3 3 P u 1- < -> < < tn > 0 H ffl tn < Z 0 M M4 N < 3 0 3P>K LU 0 0 0 < > 1- 0 m 3 0 1- >■LUI CMo o ^M M O >- M oCO •J «H CM in «• -j Q CM < in z CD Z CM o0^3 3 3 in os?m o oP 3 o M l^S 29 O m o CM u I p<-• u I o CM in ino p m in o < cu H OUI M V -T*£ 2 cuo «• iS^ &Ms Chm tnm CL a ouCO <u < z z §§ in ino -11 in 2>-i e»m 0 LU 3 cj c^Z Ufm-J P 3 in H Z M CDmin 0 Q < M in <030mCM 0 5 3 (j in X M LU LU 1 tn 0 P H Z -J h* < ••0 < Z 3 ^ CJ < 0 _V H IU Qzm4 p p Z 3 Z X Z£M IU 2 0 0 u h-P Ui & i 3 UiIU U _IU U* IU M 3 O O L c • »it ii ✓ 1 i n Cl f Ir, C^o^Q-o "^^V/C^;, ,1 I i*t A/V I (we) T!!So\v\ JS^vXcwl VvOiA ^ Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledqement^Formfvvxc:^ V’^^^sc.AXA, - -fiCnS Co^q_o \ A \ \ . - & V V V V k I — ^ •... .^\CC - <. o f '^Ob\ C,W-^^(^ VV)%V\i^AVft [print address] ' have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at C^v-kv-^S^>.<V Sclavs also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires J^uncil approval. Property Owner S-/5~-S'7 Date ^ 1^ - ( J? - /7 •<f'7 Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. i i I J o z oo: o *0 (U o 5 O O *0 r-4 V-l iH CIJ Q) U CP (U d > JJ c 0) o V4 CDa 'O o U) o u 0) > o o a'O o u U t6 a X o o o CP cd Q) ^ U < M •!• 0) Oa'-' »d 0) (0 o l4 0) > o u a'O o M M (0 (U c 0 N 0< *H Vi 0r» 0) C > •rl O 4J U m *0 •H Vi X fO U £ o 0) o D“«fH rd 4J c (U O M (D < CQ s o uXT. (U C > •H O 4J O (/) »o •H X rd (1)‘ c o N c CP fd C 0) •H U X) (d to •H XJ X o o N c u r-i o: o t/) u u: < u < ffl H u: O) Ci3 c t o sO m CM 44 to in <rCP fsN in I o in CM 5^ 00 CM U4 to <rm oun 00 CM O in <N I in o 0 m 1 om < o in m m t T 0ii njrO r-< U4 IM to to S 3 ^ 00 % o• • CM U4 U4 U4 44 to CO to to •fl 4-1 CN CP <d CM o IT o 00m U4 U4 44 44 (0 CO to to XI XI t| o CO \D O 00 oo o o o 0 rH 1 O o in to C o •H X’ U 0)u •H D to 0)no •H O o fcc to •X o o rd s 0) no •H to 0) rd c c O >1 o N iH *H a4J *0 *H •> 0 X) to o o TJ •*4 fH 44 E D 0) no a c rd T5 03 rd 0 <10 Ma to CO 44 O -C O 4i c tP-H C £ •H 4J 4J -H to 5 •H X » 0) 0) O U JC 44 O 4J O 44 M no 0) to Oa c •H fH M fH 0) rd C to D 01 > >1 O 0) o <y O 0) CD no c c o N o C 'O c •H >aa rd 0)u < 0) •H 44 •H O o <D > O u V4 o rd X) c (D Uu 0)a 0) c o c •H X) O ano (0 u (d •H d) > rd M O' V4 0) > o u•o Xi fd M O > o u 'O M fd o o >1^ •Q 0) 0) >1 u a m •H 0) c O6 N in m Im f-4 rd > O B 0) M 0) to rd 0) u c •H 4J 0) c '2 -2^ s ^rd (d JQ 0) XJ rd c •H 0) 3 C 4J c (U E X) )4 rd >1 a. XJ c (D U 3 O c o u o c c •H c rd M O 44 0) a 44 CP'H C CP c •H 44 iH 3 to 01 0)s: 44 •H c o >ino c E (U >t 3 ^ X) 4J O rH fH rd U 0) c 0) Q) to Oao >4a >1u rd to to 0)o 0) c D> O *0 O U 4^ O 0 10 OQIVI U VI jQ 4J O (0 C c 0 • 0 0 9 C ^•H *H JJ 0 > JJ 0 0 *H C U 0 0 -H O'Vi 0 0 C U C > VI C 0 0 U 0 '0 0) H 0) *H ^ O' »H M >1 Vi O ^ <U E 0 *0 VI 0 0 10 a, E to 3 4J fH 0 X B 3 E 3-H C C 3 > tr-H c X 0 O »H 0 CO 1 0)0 U X 0 0 U C 0)X U 0 c c 0 -H X O JJ 0 O' 0 0 X KS 4J JS Qi 3 C *H *H 4J i4 0 0 ***< 4J Vl 0 T3 0 >1 C *H 0 m VI 0 ♦H X *H »0 > 0 0 -H 0 > JJ - 0 *0 T3 jC > *0 •r^ JJ 0 0 3 ^ *H 3 »0 »M X -1 0 TJ *H •H C 0 0 *• O O 1 E X 0 3 *0 1 C 1 3 UJ jJ 3 •H C *H 0 iH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 1 O' 1 O' 0 0 0 0 rd 44 3 0) U M CDa CP rd JJ c ►H >4 0) > o u u rd CD O V4 0)a to 0) 0) •H 44 •H fH •H o 44 rd E CPJQ (D CO * U 0) > ou no rd rd 44 c 0) u M (V •H to too u 0) > ou o •H 44 •H O CDa to a'O )4 rd c •H ajs X) CP44 C •H C 4J *H to 40 •H 44 X -H 43 3 0) CP >1 tpno c «J •H S 44 O to > •H X W w no c •H 44 (0 •H X U3 0) to O u Q) > Ou ^3 0) to O no CD o rH rd O H U rd a 4T T5 (D a o O «H (D M rH 40 a < 44 CO to 3uto •H 'O CP c •H 4J CO •H X Q) U 0) > ou no rd O X)0 144 O cj o u a 01 XI 0) El •H C Cd fH o. >> -oa; c: •H CO xJ • ^ ■ O CO Cd 01 H < U3 H O :z: I i i I I 11 iX * -I Subject City Administrator Birn'harS®" ^Prir9/i98T""°"' ^-^-inistrator VaJiancf?R*ne:a!)^"^ISbii“^e^r!n1 ' A m * ne Appl^LSof-'L; Ar;a/£oJ S vIrXnce ^ m m Pertineat Pacts - Lot Area Required Lot Width h®, (At Rest Point Lane Setback: List of Exhibits Existing 0.63 ac 135* 91 • Variancp> •37 ac or 37% 5' or 4 % 49' or 35%) Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Discussion: Application Plat Map Notrce"?f"co£ncrfr" °"''"l“P"-ent^ uncil Approval 7/13/82 • - - i-y-K ^ -ih-y ss£H4HlK<F"‘;r” "i""/ The following facts should be noted: piSri44£*~:4HiVf? "- larger than . n of the *^de^lopV°p‘;oUr/es Sff- iff E -"ipproval, apparently for safety reasons! ^ of the 1982 XL I i»il Zoning File #1130 April 9, 1987 Page 2 of 2 There is an existing garage on the property accessing to Rest Point Road. A condition of the 1982 approval was that it be converted to storage if it is not removed, but cannot remain as a garage since it is too close to Rest Point Road (see survey). Applicants intend to use the garage for initial storage of construction materials, then remove it. The lot has no riparian rights. Because this is a "through” lot, the setback from either road is 35'. The 12' alley portion on the southwest side of the property acts only as a private driveway and is subject only to the 10' side setback. Any future accessory structures are subject to the requirement of a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 10. Staff Recommendatiori: Staff recommends approval based on the facts above, finding that no adjacent land is available, the property was platted prior to current zoning standards, sewer is available and assessed, the building site is consis*tent with properties in the Rest Point Road neighborhood and in the LR-IB zoning district, and the variances were approved previously in 1982. Approval subject to the following: 1. All proposed structures on the site must meet the setbacks of the LR-IB zoning district: - 35' from both Rest Point Road and Rest Point Lane ~ 10' from either side 2. Access to the site must be via Rest Point Lane; the access location must be approved by the Public Works Coordinator, 3. Development of the site will be limited to the hardcover regulations of the City - the property is located within the 75-250' setback area allowing 25% hardcover or 6,818 s.f. (25% of total area 27,271 s.f.). 4. If garage structure remains it must be converted to storage shed or other accessory structure permitted in residential district - it cannot function as a garage since access will be via Rest Point Lane. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the owner must submit proof of combination of Lot 14 with part of Lot 13. 6. Payment of the following fees with building permit: SAC $ 525.00 (per current fee schedule at time permit is issued) Sewer Plant Charge 225.00 Park Fee 390.00 (1 existing lot at 0.63 ac per current schedule) $1,140.00 7. This property has no riparian rights to Lake Minnetonka. lit * 40 • ^ M ^ ^ if 1 G r} 0 \\ :■{5:1 !'a J : !1'.- uaue Kcc a J '/ Fee__t iS- ro Receipt Iijitials v^,L CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1311 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Cx:>of a. ^7. i^ ~ (i"y~z3 31. oo ^Please checlc one - Is the property _ _ abstract or”^torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) ^ ~ r Name ____________ Phone (wor)c ) Ic3> •7 Address; ]M\ fy.,-} J^.r^y city: » •)3rl_ _ _ _ Zip: S~S'^ <-/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ / Phone (home) k ni > Phone (worlc ) Address; I C-> f^<y^ P4 ,.'♦-’-City ;C ry Zip; c| Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; -irr ■ y VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot VJidth Front ___ Hardcover Side Rear) |ff A ||2MD T^AvUG" ii ! ■ i HARDSHIP . Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. /Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. - - / 4Applicant's Signature Date 3 -<30 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Pl?»nning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange— ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. U ' \ %1 it < s !’1 "rin lil uaue Kec • a J -/V ' ^ V’ Fee ^ 75-. ro _________ Receipt Initials vjti.f CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ** ^ ** ** ** •“ •• •• •• mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address |3~1 ( _ _ _ _ _ 1 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 7~1-?;? ^2- Otjof 4, Please check one - Is the property n/ *’~abst7aci^ o?^^_^^torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) ^«?- '_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) - .Q /o3 - Address; ) 3 ~71 l/.r;'City; M<I'r>n_ _ _ _ Zip; c| OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) "/19 -N3^ Name Phone (work) ^~?3'3000 Address; tCr> A^<3^ Rj-,City:A Zip; c/ Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) _ _ Residential DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; 4 r ~fc 1 ij 1 acT^’"^ tV VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area i Setback Variances (_ Other Lot Width Front ___ Hardcover Side Rear) ei>tM HARDSHIP JA1i ms'iP /T\ N I W'>:i3*.*:? II •■— ^ ■ a ^ Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. /Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A--603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped^ legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. » . . • • • Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Plat Map. The Aplicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ^7 n ~T Date 3 -/9- SI OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees co this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange- pn-si^j ° authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. > / he ! . ’ ! H fn C^ Qinm ccin i o W M in o a ONOHO J O Alio UaiaNNiw dO* AA»i . • '■ -t • • I• • y * •. .. # ».*• *« •«.* a • • ♦. •. a#-- ft ,|hAn If, ----------- •I.. O Jj O . .* .* . «• ;; r * . a * * ' • ^ ^ 'r'* : . '*.^ , A*. \ c TO: FROM: DATE: Larry Langhans Jeanne A. Mabusth July 13, 1982 SUBJECT: Council approval Council voted to approve the variance application based on the following findings and hardships: 1 - No adjacent vacant lands available. 2 - Properties platted prior to existing zoning. 3 - The proposed building site appears consistent with the residential development of the surrounding neighborhood. 4 - The property has been assessed for 1 sewer unit and sewer is available. 5 - The development of the property will not endanger the public healthy safety and welfare. and subject to the following conditions: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - All proposed structures on the site must meet the setbacks of the LR-lB zoning district. Access to the site will be via Rest Point Lane •" the access location must be approved by the Public Works Coordinator. Development of the site will be limited to the hardcover regulations of the City - the property is.located within the 75*-250' setback area allowing 25% hardcover or 6818 sf (25% of total area 27,271 sf). If garage structure remains it must be converted to storage shed or an other accessory structure permitted in residential district - it cannot function as garage since access will be via Rest Point Lane. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the owner must submit proof of combination of Lot 14 with Part of Lot 13. 6 - Payment of the following fees with building permit: SAC - 425.00 Plant Charge - 225.00 $650.00 Sewer assessment already paid. To: t- > From: Date: Subject: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building 6 Zoning Administrator April 13r 1987 #1131 Guenther & Gertrud Noelting, 1060 Tonkawa Road Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances; Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional use permit required for excavation work. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Excavation within 75 feet of the shoreline not permitted. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and Subdivision 9 A (5) - Excavation or structures within 75 feet of the lake are not permitted except for seasonal docks. LMCD Code Subdivision 8 - Docks: Dimension Limits. A in Section 3.01, Subdivision 2, may exceed six feet, excluding P<^sts, in either its length or width, but not both; provided, ^ docks which are in existence on June 30, 1982 and which a compliance with all the provisions of the LMCD Code other Section 30.02, Subdivision 8 shr.ll be allowed to continue in their present form without expansion or modification until such time as such docks are replaced or until 50% or more of any such dock is damaged or destroyed. %s amended. Ordinance No. 12, Section 2; Ordinance No. 55. ) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit 3 - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Acknowledgement/Petition From Neighbors Building Permit Plan - Structural Deck Section Review of Application: The applicants installed a permanent dock with season'! is complete. Zoning File #1131 April 13, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Review of Dock Plans: The 24 feet length ties will extend 9 feet from the bank for an approximate 20 feet width (see Exhibit F), Dock sections cannot exceed a width of 6 feet per LMCD standards. The City has never permitted a platform at the lakeshore for a dock that exceeded the allowed 6 feet width. Applicant should advise if this will be a problem. Staff would also recommend to applicant that the elevation of the support ties be placed high enough to prevent any contact with ice. Access stairs must be limited to 4 feet width. Staff Recommendation: To approve the conditional use permit/variance application of Guenther & Gertrud Noelting to allow the installation of a permanent dock supported by underground ties within the adjacent lakeshore bank based on the following findings: 1. The applicants propose no changes in existing elevations or drainage. 2. No hardcover is proposed within the protected lakeshore setback area. 3. A permanent dock with pilings had been installed in 1984 and was destroyed within 2 years by the unusual pressure/shifting of the ice along this portion of shoreline on Maxwell Bay. Conditions of Approval: 1. Dock length sections cannot exceed 6 feet in width when constructed over lake. 2. Access stairs to dock cannot exceed 4 feet width. nIT'rr 1n (T^-1 t.i '■■ f) ii /f CITY OP ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 1060 Tonkawa Road Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 38 08-117-23-13-0019 Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description required survey. to application if not included on APPLICANT Phone (home) 472-2062 Name Neil Weber Phone (work) 936-9818 Address 5111 Windsor Road City Mound Zip 55364 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) 471-0221 Name Guenther & Gertrud E. Noelting phone Address 1060 Tonkawa Road City Orono Zip 55356 Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (’o not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. mam mm mm mmt mm mmm imm mm mm ^ ^ mm mm mm mm mam mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm ma mm mm ma mm ^m am mm mm mm mm ^m mm ^m mm ^m mm ^m ama ^m am FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS i $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ _ S250.00 $200.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore •3 PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property __ _ Residential Other (specify) description op request Describe request in detail; Replace 6 wood piers in bank with 3 steel beams to create a platform from which seasonal dock wi 1T proieci:" required submittals 1. Completed Application Form. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Certificate of survey. Construction plan, if applicable. Plat Map. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use AppUoItlon'ircompieter'' Zoning Officials Signature Date applicant'S SIGNATURE IpslSPfsIsslSi Applicant's signature lA^— Date lUuh ipi OWNERS SIGNATURE owner’s signature f yV/);; , -3 X6'.S' PllininS all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the third Mondav of ■ I’lanning Commission Meetings are held on the month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled pplicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make review meA4-<nrTo a.u HitjaenT: ar axx scneau applicant is ^unaK^i Planning Commission and Council, and, if iiiTuZTiii r • \vb «i '<• H i j; iT)tf> V' f.; ;i *v A *'V!^^ Xv' 0» *'/?<C\ ^ O • ^' /'c • O NJ4«J.* fC“' V< J,^OT i6 A Cs. • n t I’O ^ >.* 0 ti— A4")s (2^ y\ LOT 6 ' ' ^£il£---------- —•— T / yj 2 ?r --■-/-—’ - • — /« / Port of . OT IS (0 \ Si> ?’c.%\ ^ n ■?' T? kO • ^ , a S?^o, -^V- ^ ^Vir'in ;5; igoj V»\ • ^\ ; aH ^ \ y y c 5 Vv ^•::pf/ -----------------------T-EaajjU-OT iT ._ LOT 10 * \ V CARUAfOOID / \^ ’i- A I ^ \ 2 ^v)y \ -OO f— 60^ < r •) (A)\ Port of lot 7 / - '' tP'' ' xA / V-. Xo'o \V''^%. •B \ - ^o-y'W <^('* \ i , VA \ “t*» \ \\ lot 9 \ ' \ c-^ U^V rs D To the City of Orono I've seen the plans for the Noelting's permanent dock. I have no objection to it's installation. OcUciu (jl^ ^ fl)Jimhh \mlm) ^IC no V-^cc Ac(oO CM/OO^ ■ (cn'ff TTci? dirjiij® ElicTT'-.rJf'.T'' T7^ 0 4tciTQnfi 2:o;::.wG OijTKicr AND APPLICATION FOR CGnilFICATG OF CCCUPAfXY CJQYST/^^ 5S323 473-7257 SITE ADDRCS3 LEGAL OZCCn!?TlO;j: PRO?. 10. LOT.----------------------------CI-OC^-----------------------CUCDIViSfON PERMIT K? ;' 51C3i DATE IC3UED EXPIRES ______________ FIRE EONb' 1 VAR. DATE C0.\0. UCC DATE LOVAi.EAi v;;OT$i DEPTH : I .':c:c!..:D,cEvcACKa li.J.MT l.’.LIDE t.JAJI I U j;oe LA::e ‘ VVETLARjO c;j.v ‘ G;;iovi;;o ACw.A.C ri'.U V. C.'iTE LilY • V 4 # « I Ij I k !• L.4 I j rfOWOMta J O’.VNER v._ /(/.f AcI.J/ j.AtiCHITCCT/Er.'GI.'JEEH - f.7c;{ C&rti;v\.:Jj Fi„-n:;y, Commarcial U fftduHfiil Comt/u:tcn CERT. NO.______ a2Ji*a _L-^Y'vnT»’.i'-»-f- ■-•>.T->~n r---v yj'-iO tvfi:o;v;3,n( <<2) toTSi f W«*W»«ooi# CO.*43T. TYF£oLOo Size *L.V7. Ml. r.CClOCfjflAl stowiea 0 <23 ■ L/..2LL COKM3'FLO ■CJAH. STALLL i.VTT. tLPTIC APF DAte f’*’''!'______ HCilO. )FH0r03c0U-E ,3CC. .wV074IC3 COU'.CIL Apv. oAf e Lit coiwr. VALUAVtJ;4 PuU.V.jV FLL J CL03.Pc:.;.7iT STATE PEG Plan review . ‘.a FENALTy PAKX FEE SACCIUROS TOTf;?. C'J2 ^.^^0 ^^ P.i^'TnAm . tCCi 11.*: 3 jf .r\:.jLAVi3.i V;ALLC3Ar. J C Jofa Ti^u., • ' tfi f ^09f fc - -Jo I ___•» •«• w V.I LJFA'.v ’AVU Fc(.;v.li;; TI.‘.’AL Lir;,rj t— 1.-; :!7 C"vc :;d c:i vv.tuc ’jt a r.c- ! L j ^■ .•c-Vlo.•i v.;ll cg tjj- I I..J. ....Ttw.i 11...Jt ..j ^73*7C.j7 C.' LLO ■ 12 A M. i:.;.^. I - 4 P M } CALL I- 4 P.M. l.»_,M.:xT DAY PLU • 4 '« I • , M McCRArx ’.CAL V^CLL______ c:;PTic L2V.cH WATC;i I CnADi;.\3 O FILLING _ CLCCTAiCAL frcmSiaU COP-Y V.;:iTe-FILC- G.';CL;j-FirjAUC6 c/^rjAnY-ir;LrccTon coLD-i(tcEi?T i*k ;k -ac ;wL:;c .i WMtf wL.W-«Mift»«4«ta.4 J i Tk S Lcal i.v..wvuVc;..j k:.j Lzzik:..j t'....w.l FL.'.ALTV Or LAV/Aw ...W..LL—.— -r k\Jk„^n. A..WW OF A ll i..rOA,VAT»w..'. Lw...w.*'i^..j a :.j Lw-u ..,.:. L.w.jfs i.w..>i;iL;«Tto C.'4 li.wi cCww_ ..j7. ti.j t ww.;- L;G.,wi7Fi;..VKC.‘lAGAwCiit>jUjALLV.w...;jt.'7L.'K.C.*t;..J- | PLU;.WW V..V(J ALLCiTvcr c ;.c .'.jc ....-.a :.cua .jl/a TC OF L’—.;:lorALU.LC...aC0w2I;LCw.AL.-w.4M. ./ /* • -Y -------„c*C - ^ tvm/ ' 77^ 7 vA f H• .. s--; • ► ':v;r • • %»_ • •' I • f**» ,.* ' % . (f- .1.. j •* »• .. i ,« '. ^ f . ■!. ^ • \ • ’•'•• ‘ ’ ‘ -7 V•• .-H' # •«# N “ # ^ 4 > •• ^#«• % » » » f .V . > • • C*" -s f • 1 • i ■; ■<»' V- ] • rV ; • > ■* « . •V \1 • - 'V* > * ' t•. ^ •r ^ >1 T----------*-♦• « 1 • \ • 1 ?F •% \ 1 . I 1 p • •/i • « i Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth. ^ailding & Zoning Administrator April 15, 1987 Subject ®^^gardner, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing ° Zoning District ~ RR-IB Pertinent Section of Zoning Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (H): non-conforming^use'^^^^^^^^°”^ which do not extend or intensify the Council Directives Per Resolution 1546 - iLllZ revi ’e:fd"lnd"':u%Tb\' change in ownership to any nartv otw Council upon Wisegraver or Glenn Nellist Ld/or Low^lJ lohapL" “-tail sale of products, package meat, fish or oo^, 14- bakery goods, dairy cooking or cleaning supplies, paper sundries, etc. Food shall not- ho cooLd on seed, or served for 4 rnn-unv^ i l^^e premises or otherwise prepared forn^ tahe-out rys\VuVnyr"d\\Tca\Vs^sln or^i/^ CouncTM'^granted th%"VorMer" lefse°e%Lrato‘»e Orono referenced condition of Resolution 164^^1^® amendment of the above delicatessen use. The delicatessen use 1. ® a bake was installed and continues to be a popu“la"r reLu^c^'^®'^ List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Plat Map Property Owners List Addendum Council Resolution Approved 3/11/85 Resolution 1646 Council Minutes 3/11/85 Floor Plan - Application 893 Staff Sketch of Floor Plan - Application 1132 Applicant s Revised Floor Plan roir«i r«rti(i Mtli [•J f HO iKslOOAJ [•HiirOiH«1 rotXfi y ^1 •] O [•HiTO rotH#i XjtllfT ^XtTi lOlMOC [iWI It. > Zoning File #i::2 April 15, 1987 Page 3 of 3 B) Approve the deli use in addition to transferring the permit to new owner/operator with the condition that there will be no expansion of retail floor area and that deli use is to be incorporated with mini bakj operation within Work Area 1 finding the reconstruction resulting in an increase in retail floor area and an expansion or intensification of the non-co'^forming use, and, once again, direct staff to draft the appropriate findings for Council review and action. C) Approve the delj. use and reconstruction resulting in an increased retail floor area of approximately 90 s.f. with the transfer of the permit to the new ov/ner/op^rator, once again, directing staff to draft the appropriate findings. Please provide the applicant an opportunity to amend the current proposal if one of the abo^ "i items requested is not approved. The following are conditions that should be applied to the appropriate actions cited above: 1. The applicant must apply for a license from the Hennepin County Community Health Department for the delicatessen use. 2. Foods shall not be served for immediate consumption either on the premises or in the form of take-out restaurant. [ 'jfT ■n Ii tj O 0-3 CITY OP ORONO GENERi\L LAND USE APPLICATION cAO'^O/ 7-2. aJ fr PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address yO« _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) / |^ c^3 3^/ /lOO^ Please check one - Is the property akstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description required survey. to application if not included on APPLICANT Name "Dr^ i / ^ <; (C ,'T^; .vn Ca ’C Address C/^l(\ f?o>9T> Phone (home) 3 ^’OO Phone (work) City (?orr,irrt O zip^ S3VO OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) 5^3*7^ Name 5^n nr(j/n^Phone _________________________ Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zip_ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) ((do not)/also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg ^ $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seasfall, retaining walls within 75' of lakesiiore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150,00 r; * / . Cl.. V $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals 1 Other - see fee schedule " J f \ ! PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY ^ Present Zoning District Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ <: r <-• •' ft I. _ _ _ Residential Other (specify) GouRry^efe: -SfoRe^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ^ Describe request in detail; C-<r <^-ors~^i4-A\ n ^ c . . r..< P •-tc ^ r> f r^'f7 !%\ <; REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2.Certified Property Owners List of owners with»n 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Fxxi- noe A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature . > r/ . ? T"..) v Date ".^'7 OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature ^ A .^4 \ f I-Date S - cP -?7 .tfl.Applicant must have all^^^^^bmittals "into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I BUMGARDNER'S ASPHALT MAINTENANCE CO.17301 RIDGEVIEW DRIVE ■ MINNETONKA, MN 55343 | C K (XI ^ a 5 612/475-0459 i— ^ "PAi' O \0 U'l Bui'^'t ^ ASi'De '6u,d 1 lO 4 r-’*- - f.Jrv*» 4 •%-% ■ ' l\ L r* . i 2) i) AiVGe Ti i G V nn A K e loe 10 ‘ ro S lO'O A I/-,-.*; ^ \x€.\ o; vu& - \^ Sc ,.x e ) c.^-'T Mov-rtA pps«x 1 4- c^ ^ A\^T ^.v- l-o-t ^ Re.-'^AS^ S.'6n)S OR Re-CorsA;t;oR I lO C> 0€.o oo_^.v<?, oc. 5:>idG Op R \\- . to p. w p _ Sr s i-Dt OF -So, Id.ri.^ ' ‘ '“'='‘^n'^S -Ln^-j-ALL i^i6HTil04 i) -Lns+^-^lL Cei\-,,X4 Fa-,vS in,sine oF Sui'(dU‘iV6 (3) '“) Q R CSx'^tctir. C Cl p_d o.e. i^-n\ rAon'i-Voft b n.5; 'V Build I Vr ‘ O-F "ReA^\\\[i\c "S Id^- OvA ARour^T3 T)vn.pc,^(5 ) ‘e^R \ Tl c\ Q_ A <B> u ;\d B)-'1 ' i^So Sf 3p' _ +~looa ^Gc<u-\. L)s=-')> Kq.c. ge,e>A I^pprcueo uMfcC to/4\v e.ixcAos6_t) ; , . ------------- • • r-|--'> i''=-^-> u(«oVC(< toMjtd SClxix^ fj r b/<!>/■/ /k//‘Sr boT f\M>-cionAL bbcc>y\ flnD Ae.Ccns■Mucr7C7^ //«S X7dzt. „. — — -- -------------- n4x,7-0Ff FREE ESTIMATES ■ SEALCOATING SPECIALISTS ■ PATCHING ■ SWEEPING oc C/1 C-£ Ib ASPHALT MAIIMTENANci CO. 17301 RIDGEVIEW DRIVE ■ MINNETONKA, MN 55343 ■ 612/475-0459 <3 ^ c to{j2 CVi_c.au ■\. V-.0 ^ '-'Vv cX^ ^LMl- OUl v<j- V.t bj?. r -«-t^ '^-t-^:i-&L.c, 'S L/. —jC-^W Q. ^J a c. V ‘^'VvO -S>(SL<.o»3^?'V<^' <L ce ^ ■- a^cM: r ^'h P'-c-tCcvcts ^(■^^■CacL f cr?*- v> t» FREE ESTIMATES ■ SEALCOATING SPECIALISTS ■ PATCHING SWEEPING -e. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR approving an amendment of conditional use permit RESOLUTION 1646 allowing new retail uses within EXISTING RETAIL AREA OF MARKET PILE 893 the applica"n“Th'avTan“inttrlst (hereinafter Wisegarver (hereinafter owner) looted arssorw Within the City of Orono /hi. Boulevard described as follows: (heieinarter "City) and legally ACRES''f^icnording^to^the^reco*^^ V' "^^^^^TONKA GARDEN southerly of the cen?erMni i? thereof, lying Highway NO. 6 Plaf 5 as f • State Aid 3844152 Of Hennepin ciun^y re ord^J^ of adjoining old County c ^ ° after the pr^rtyj^a^d ‘ ® (herein- Conditionaro«®fe'r™i®oe^rie°o%"^" have applied to the City for a to amend Resolution IM^e It^em 1 “(Bj^of^.h ®“‘''^^vision 5 (H) and and Conditions section of that Conclussions, Order limited delioatersen serv^eand 1 ® b^ke, within 20-X25' designat 1 outdoor sries'^area‘*® Placed market. sales area at the east side of Minnesota:”””' be it RESOLVED by the City of Orono, FINDINGS 1- The application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 893. zining%fstrlct': ” Rasidential to p?r®miTi^m1nV for a Conditional Use Permit preS%o\g”hT w^'n "t^ilA^tin^ °"ta^\^® haRing™o^‘ p"k-u; serv" ce""of %'rff P-vidlng YoTiv°ety"or within"^ retaVl are oTLrVaf kitchen and sold Within designated outdoor saLrarea‘^at'’east%idrotto serve retail customers. market Page 1 of 5 ■ ) I 4. On June 11, 1984, Council approved Resolution 1646 granting a Conditional Use Permit to the applicants, sec tions of that resolution set forth limitations on the retail uses of the market, a large non-conforming use, the appli cants seek amendment of the following section of that resolution: Item 1 (B) of the Conclusions, Order and Conditions; b) Retail sale of normal grocery items including food stuffs, bakery goods, dairy products, package meats, fish or poultry, candy, tobacco, sundries, cooking or cleaning supplies, paper products, pet food or bird seed, etc. Food shall not be cooked on the premises or otherwise prepared or served for immediate consumption either on the premises or in the form of take-out restaurant or delicatessen service. 5* The applicants also seek confirmation per Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (H) "___ incidential alterations which do not extend or intensify the non-conforming use" that the uses proposed above will not intensify or extend the current market operation. 6. On February 19, 19^5, the Orono Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the applicants based on one or more of the following findings; A. The new uses will not involve permanent structural changes or additions to existing structure. B. The new uses will not involve expansion of the retail area. C. The new uses will not encourage customers to consume food on the premises as with a restaurant use. D. The new uses a.^pear consistent with the original intent and scope of the market as set forth in Resolution 1646. ,7/: E. The applicants have not violated a condition of Resolution 1646. F. At the current level of operation, there is adequate parking area. The new uses will not create additional parking demands. Page 2 of 5 Miira rsiir«i MlT«l @lfl« RHr ^Bira r«jiKf¥^[•r«^[•lira ^;i«li] WMiKra 5 Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council on this 11th day of March, 1985. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor (1) Property Owner Page 4 of 5 CITY dpi- ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1646 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LOWELL SCHAPER AND GLENN NELLIST AUTHORIZING CONTINUED NON-CONFORMING USE OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - PILE #826 WHEREAS, Lowell Schaper and Glenn Nellist (hereinafter the applicants) have an interest in a property owned by Vicki Wisegarver (hereinafter owner) located at 3800 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Those parts of Lots 11, 12, and 13, "MINNETONKA GARDEN ACRES", according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of the centerline of Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 6 Plat 5, as deliniated in Book 70, Page 3844152 of Hennepin County records. Also the north 1/2 of adjoining old County Road No. 6 now vacated (her'_ inaf ter the property); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a conditional \ise permit per Section (10.03, Subdivision (5A-J) and per Orono Resolution #1377, 18 (c) of the conditions of approval to permit changes in the non-conforming, commercial rse of the residential property- NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Findings 1. The application was reviewed as zoning file no. 826. 2. The property is located in the RR-IB, Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. On March 22, 1982, Council approved Resolution #1377 establishing standards and limits on the commercial use of the residential zoned property. 4. In filing application #826, the applicants requested modifications in the approved use levels and alterations both external and internal of the existing structure as follows: a) Removal of the defined residential apartment, saxd area to be used only for storage and employee rest room, employees lunch room and office. 1 Iw-:*//Vf 1 *A Wimfrwr-A U r '•' . ♦ ^ V L CITY OF ORONO ■ 'i City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _1646_ _ _ _ _ b) Relocate west access to a more central location on west wall and removal of existing office area to allow better flow and circulation within the store. The 188 sf of office area will not be used as commercial sales area but shall serve only as open circulation area. # # c) The exterior alterations involve construction of a second story loft area, new roof, removal of canopy on south side of existing structure, privacy fencing around outdoor sales area and 3 1/2* split rail fence along the boundaries of the property. Applicants propose no commercial use of the loft as the loft will be used for display and decorative purposes. No public access to loft will be allowed. 5. Council has approved applicants request to remove the residential unit within the existing structure finding no intensification or extension of the commercial use of the residential property based on the following findings; a) The area occupied by the residential unit shall be used solely for storage, lunch room/employee lounge and new office. The approximate 450 sf of the residence apartment may never be used for commercial sales area. b) The structure has not contained a residence since late 1970's. c) The City Inspector has never issued a certificate of occupancy for the rehabilitated apartment. d) The previous lessee and current applicants note the’ following drawbacks in renting such a unit to an employee or owner; (1) The existing apartment is too small and cannot provide adequate living area. (2) A responsible agent of the store would never want to live there. (3) Since the applicants all own their own homestead farms, they could not claim the apartment legally as their residence. (4) A single renter may not wish to be subjected to the possible dangers of breakins and the associated responsibilities. CITY k' OF rORONO i04ra#j r#vxsx« »r»T»i [•nm P3V*ISX« ^•it]•IMm FsT»l»] ^kc: :^-:CITY 'OF ORONO r'; ■■ » V; City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1646 The City never received complaints on the commercial use of the property as operated by the previous lessee under the standards of operation setforth in Resolution #1377. 12.The City. Council has considered this application including the finding and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, and comments by the applicant and other ^^Lerested persons and the effect cf the continued commercial use of the residential property as proposed on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 13.The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to permit the continued commercial use of the residential property as proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and the location and proposed use of the residential property will be in keeping with the intent and objectvies of the zoning code and comprehensive plan of the City. Conclusions, Order and Conditions Based on the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdiv (5 (a) through (j)] and Orono Resolution #1377 to Lowell Schaper, Glenn Nsllist, and Vicki Wisegarver to permit the continued commercial use of the property located at 3800 Wayzata Boulevard as proposed by the applicants subject to the following conditions: 1.Per Resolution #1377, the commercial use authorized by this conditional use permit shall consist of, and be limited to, the following: a) Retail but not wholesale sale of farm produce, nuts, fruits, vegetables, bedding plants, Christmas trees, flowers and simlar items grown on or off this property. b) Retail sale of normal grocery items including food stuffs, bakery goods, dairy products, package meats, fish or poultry, candy, tobacco, sundries, cooking or cleaning supplies, paper products, pet food or bird seed, etc. Food shall not be cooked on the premises or otherwise prepared or served for immediate consumption either on the premises or in the form of take-out restaurant or delicatessen service. I .M. ■ s^.y City of OROIVO CITY OF OFiONO [h:w *: ■ • f* 5 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _^6 c) Retail off“sales of 3.2 beer subject to separate consideration of licensing provisions and requirements. d) Retail accessory sale of miscellaneous items including small crafts/ pottery, food or cook books, garden supplies or small quantities of firewood provided such sales are accessory to the grocery or produce business. e) Commercial sales and storage shall be confined within the main building and 500 sf yard area designated as outdoor sales area. f) Outdoor sales of produce, plants, garden supplies or seasonal items such as pumpkins, Christmas trees, etc shall be permitted provided such activities are confined to an area of approximately 500 square feet located east of the main building as indicated on Exhibit A. Outdoor display or sales may not occur in the parking lot nor in the area referred to as ’porch" area of the main building nor in the front yard setback area nor in any highway right-of-way. g) Exterior storage of commercial stock, fixtures or supplies shall not be permitted except within the designated outdoor sales area. h) The existing detached garage may continue to be used for inside commercial storage. i ) Commercial signage for the entire property shall be limited to approximately 200 square feet including any temporary or portable signs. This would not involve traffic directional signs. j) Produce may be grown on-site for sale on the premises. k) The maximum number of regular employees on the premises at any one time shall not exceed 4. 1) The commercial/retail business may be open to the public 7 days a week; the hours of operation shall be between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. City of ORONO CITY OF ORONO 1 “» -If* ■ ^ • M • D 2. 3. 4. 5. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1646_ _ _ _ _ m) At least 15 parking stalls, each at least 9' x 20' in size, shall be available at all times to support the approved level of commercial use. Designated parking^ stalls must be maintained so as not to interfere with required building exit doors, service doors or required space for delivery trucks and/or trash containers. « Prior to reopening the business to the public, the applicants or their contractors shall obtain all required permits to correct any code violations on the property specified by the Building Official. The applicants and owner are hereby notified that the City Council will not consider any future building construction, additions or expansion for commercial uses because to do so would extend or intensify the non-conforming use contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code and contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Commmunity Management Plan. This provision does not preclude normal building maintenance, repair or incidental alterations necessary uo continue the non- conforming use within the existing structures as permitted by the terms of this resolution and Orono Resolution #137/. The applicants and owner agree that they have no vested property rights to continue commercial use of the premises except in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of this resolution and Orono Resolution #1377, and that the City may impose additional conditions as may be needed in the future in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Applicant further agree to waive any rights to object to such other conditions if after a complete and full hearing the City Council determines that such condition is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The conditional use permit shall become effective upon adoption by the Citv Council and upon agreement and signature by the owner Vicki Wisegarver and by the intended leasees, the applicants, Lowell Schaper and Glenn Nellist. This permit shall be automatically void if not signed by both owner and applicants prior to August 7, 1984. M'.i ’"'MSm: yi-‘CITY OF IVORONO 6. 7. 8. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ _1646 — This non-conforming conditional use permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the property owners, applicants and their heirs and assigns, except as follows; a) This permit shall be automatically void for any violation of or non-compliance with the terms and conditions of Resolution U377 and as amended in the terms and conditions stated herein. b) This permit shall be automatically transferrable to a new or different leasee/operator provided the property ownership remains unchanged. c) This permit shall be reviewed and must be transferred by the City Council upon change in ownership to any party other than the Keller Trust, Vicki Wisegarver, or Glenn Nellist and Lowell Schaper. d) This permit for non-conforming use shall be automatically void upon discontinuance of commercial use for a period or twelve months (Sec. 10.03 Subdiv 5 e), fire, flood or other calamity (Sec 10.03 Subdiv 5 d), or upon change to a conforming residential use (Sec 10.03 Subdiv 5 c). This permit shall not serve to grant any property right other than as specifically provided and conditioned herein. Any violation of or non-compliance with the terms of this permit or Resolution #1377 is and shall constitute a violation of the Orono Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council at a regular meeting held June 11, 1984. 9. ATTEST; ,<r -y/ Alberta M. Strom, City Clerk Mary C. Eutier, Mayor\ X ^ City of ORONO CITY OF ORONOd RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1646 (1^^^perty^^mer (2) Property Owner ^JLl ,r» 1 7' (3) Property Owner/ (4) Property Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )i On this day of_ and for \V.JL, V _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1984, before me a Notary said County, personally appeared ^^ ji — known to me to Public within f \ Sct'ta r .________________________________________ be the person(sY described Th and who c'xecuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. r.M. NOTARY PUg_^C f:.CINDY J. HEUE.V V-'7:V - wiNNfsotA CCUNIY... CCUNIY^ ftijT . -rifTiisjicn J2, Wrp MY COMMISSION EXPIRES & 9 . MINUTES OE THE OKONO COUNCll. MEETING HEl.U MARCH 11, 1905 4 <1892 MORTEN SON PAGE 6 walkway to''reduce's^^^^^^^^ of^the^ hardcover. Kor\enson noted way!' *'Mortensors\ate”tLt’‘p\\!!^^^ asked him to cut his proposal back to only allow 30 percent hardcover and he has done so. CounciImember Frahm felt that proposal included too much hardcover allowed for the property Mayor Butler noted that the applicant aas been subjected to two 75' setbacks. overall hardcover on the property. Councilmember L. Adams moved, Mayor Butler seconded, ^ approve Resolution #1734 , A Resolution Approving a Variance to Thomas Mortenson to allow the construction of an addition and a garage limiting the hardcover to 30 percent. Motion, Ayes (2), Nays (2). Councilmembers Frahm and T. Adams vo nay. • V Sir*:; ;r cons?ric?io^n '^or^a^n %ddit^^^^^^ language^^o hardcover to 27 percent subject to staff adding language to the resolution concerning the special decking trea men Motion, A.yes (3), Nays (!)• Councilmember Frahm vote nay. F-^^hm felt that this was too much hardcover to allow within the 0-250 setback zone. i89VSUMMERFlELD FARMS WAYZATA BLVD ^SOLUTION^I173s‘’^’^lenn Nellist and Lowell Schaper were present. Zoning Administrator Habusth explained are seeking an amendment to the original resolution that approved tL operation of the store. Mabusth stated that they are seeking approval of two store: mini-bakery and delicatessen use. that during the review by the Planning Commission, anolican^ s also expressed their desire to have one table in the defined sales area to bethat sometimes stop into the =tore and have no place to consume the products they have purchased. Mabusth stated that the intent of the picnic table is not to have employees serve customers, but to have the customer purchase ^he item . from fho retail counter. Mabusth stated that the proposal • d!cs not appcar\"„T an intensification of the existing use. r" tT'ii I iiiBnaiiiiJii 1Ft « ' ‘ t 1 1-rtf t f'i t t4**- f*f»* ^ ' ♦ **’ ' ’ ■ . ! •’*:^ r_ii»rl'.ir±ii*ri • .i.i..:.i______lJ^ f ' '} 4 « .-» s !rd 1 Ol iijJ 1—1 S 1 ____JHaJ -----------r:zrr: TO;Planning Commission PROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning and Zoninq Administrator DATE:April 17, 1987 SUBJECT: File #1134, Paul Baszucki, 250 Wakefield Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Road - Application: Excavate/Clean out an existing low basin area to create an aesthetically pleasing pond Zonirc: District ~ RR-lB 2 acre unsewered List of Exhibits A B C D E P DISCUSSION Application and Letter of Request Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Topographic Sketch Airphoto This is a request to deepen into a pond the existing "muckhole” on the applicant's property adjacent to the Luce Line Trail and near the Wayzata Country Club maintnenace ouilding. This is not a designated wetland, but is a pothole of about 100' diamet^ outlet. Applicants have been cleaning the trees and debris from this site and wish to regrade the pond, deepening it so it will have a water surface and making the banks more defined. The plan will place all the excavated fill along the banks and along the Luce Line Trail where the existing bank is eroded and in poor condition. Applicant has contacted the DNR. Staff discussed the project with Del Barber, DNR Trail Administrator, who stated that he has met with the Baszuckis' and the DNR approves of the project, feels it will be an asset, and no DNR permit is required as long as applicant works with Luce Line Trail Manager Dick Schmidt during the grading work. City Engineer Glenn^ Cook has visited the site and recommends also agreeing that the project will have no detrimental watershed impact and will be a benefit to the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for the proposed grading and fill, noting that no fill will enter or leave the site, subject to the following conditions: ■J I M M 1. ) Applicant or applicant's contractor shall obtain a grading permit prior to commencement of the work. 2. ) All graded areas shall be seeded or sodded immediately upon completion of the grading work. 3. ) Applicant shall provide errosion protection measures as deemed necessary by the City Inspector. 4. ) Applicant shall grant to the City a Flcwage and Conservation Easement over the basin. Applicant to provide legal description for same. 5. ' Applicant shall work with the proper DNR authorities during the project. ; ■•'i gSSST' PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:a f t ( t -4? ».O \ ^RJBQUIRED SUBMITTALS (l.^) Completed Application Form. (2^ f Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) (3^Stamped^ legal sized envelopes (#10) pre—addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. (?)Certificate of survey.1 Construction plan, if applicable. Plat Map. j • X c/i7 The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied i^ true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature £Date /Y) ^ -7 0/ f ■) OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. I V---—-—Owner's signature Date 'T) 'rr c /-^ 0 / (C. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 rtMU9i rtviiQ z§m a a :q X o m r 533 > a 3 a m P 5S|| !$! OB Iro 04 fVB o o o 04 O 04 O OB•< o •< :< ^ ^ CD ^ > O M > X > > I -Io -I > f 09 >• o o o o o 'i H o -q Z > S :u E X ^ o z *q rri -q m > 93> m o z > a O 3 93 93 m 04 OB 04 I OB I rvB 04 04 o o 04 OB U 0 1 §55o -n -n (/) 0) U1 I- H H U1 > > > 04 X a a o m rvj 04 z a m >r o o 93 O t \‘c*.,; H O Z > X >» X ;f 3 *0 ri m > 93 N -<> ni a 93 a 93 T393OUmm>aa 93 Z X 04 OB 04 c^ I ^isgCl t3 -n Ui (/) 4/1 r- H H Ui > > > 04 X o o •o m o> I rvB 04 04 z o m H > r- o o o C9 5S:-< O s? > o z 3 3 04 <h I a c5 4/1 r- 4/1 > 04 X «o rn z >T1 </) H > O 5T1 4/1 Hg OB 4 fNB 04 04 93a m H >r- o oo <o !Sl I OB I fNB 04 O o iH O TJ Z > >: 93>> X 2 o Z U m T3 m > 93 \ -< > > m 2 C3 O 93 > O a 3 93 93 m -<s > r 04 n o > o O Z R« z|> > z X m f- m ma Ti #• 2 2 M m m > > C ^ < o o m 4/1 M 4/1 93 m 04 a O 04 O OB 04 C^ O 04 O' I > OB X 4 m r> -T1 04 M m 04s- m Z r.i I o z o o ►- 4JI <1 / ifTl) r’ n tnr; li Uf 5 -<s > rj in o 93 93 > > C C 5 09 X ► m oiism r- X X b M M in in 93 04 o O 04 o Ob f\>in ®1S! I in _ N- r ►- m r/ 91 04 M ni 04 5*“ O z o C3 H-r r» A' 't- ifB 8 i { JH O Z HZ > ?: 93 Z >> X 3 O > X3 93 m z 3 Zm > Z n >\ -< 1>\ -<> m Z O > mCT z o o z a 3 z oz m z O 93 3: «3 om 93 73Z O^ S m C93XOo ^ X X 04 I OB I IVB 04 O o o 4n 5i 04 vj in z X m Z Mni G S z 04 O a a ? X m 0* 93 ^ 5ri > Z Z Z m z OB 4 ro 04 o o o OB zm i H5Clm • z M •- 04 U1 o H- V \I rz n X hi OJ5oX oo x>io > Hm o \os Xm *0M 3 T' i' “IT i Mti- ;dnis Ism • •V H U4 U1 O C C c (( IT-' SI ^5 / > * \ V- *___I ' ' V* LX‘^ 'f- \ . * • • '•' M ' ^ 'V^ V \ 3\ <0 % ^\ ' K'eb 63ot / ?*oyo ■'•'n 2.C •> toc<^>' /•i P-Z q-LJtf-/ --TJ P^(t * * I I. t\ ^\ ^. %% m%% / « » ^ . \.» 1, • , / ' 1. ' / ■ '■' /, ■•• t! t ^ ^ « . . “?5^-----"f'. ■1^ ’ / \ 1 \ 1 • .' / ' ^ A ^1V'.. 'A.1 t\ \ V \ %%%• - ^ ^A \ \ ‘y ' f ^ \; V 3, 1' '’-' 2 T - '‘W /X" ^ ♦ it \-v V ‘. * v-A * . / ( \ \f"\ \\ li V >——\’5r^/ ITSt / A X 7 v>»::L 02 0^ linb: . lUC^ « , Il.„*..*byc;H: v.a^ P‘*er'-‘;'f- .Lk ii turi . ;va:% ^ *-u:'. /. 'I '• V- ^ Jjb^ V. J' v" *VV*. V ; ^ V. • -4, t's ■ ji V. \ . ^V' k x.»flr ^ V w\ I f’>‘; “ •.“K v^ ;\'d I TO Planning Commission FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator DATE:April 15, 1987 SUBJECT: File #1135 - Robert C. Hanning, Jr., 4220 Sixth Avenue North - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA, 5 Acre Application: Conditional Use Permit for fill along Sixth Avenue North to create a berm for noise control purposes. List of Exhibits A B C D- F G H - Application - Plat Map - Property Owners List Survey with original proposal (Fill in designated wetland) - Survey with revised proposal (No fill in designated wetland) - Staff sketch noting berm height above crown - Topographic survey of area along County Road 6 - Airphoto/designated wetlands overlay PERTINENT PACTS - After staff and City Engineer reviewed proposal, it was indicated to applicant that staff could not support a proposal to fill the designated wetland, and suggested that applicant consider deleting that portion of proposal, but perhaps adding a bend in the berm and extention to parallel the wetland. Revised preliminary plan received 4/15/87. - Total fill (prior to revision) = 13,800 cubic yards + - Average depth of fill above existing grade - 17' + - Average height of fill above crown of road - 11' (compare with natural grade just east of property, with height above road crown - 8' +) - Proposed sidelopes = 100% (1 to 1); this is probably not mowable without great difficulty and some danger; and special slope protection measures would be needed to avoid erosion problems DISCUSSION The original proposal to fill the wetland area would be 1 precedent-setting it "^ret^entton purposes, and itrUn^g'’it^rid"J\°nl^-?ftart"w\^^^^^ t\e .unici^pal code and comprehensive plan. The municipal code P-vides no uTrrbofe'the'"/row°n ofTh^ hence considertaions of fill right-of-way road, total depth types are all STAFF RECOMMENDTAION staff would suggest you v^fs^ua 1 impTc\ (and^ temporary noise control may have on the neighborhood. construction to address:The following items might be appropriate - Maximum height of fill above road crown. - Maximum ^ lop® mowablel the view from neighboring properties. - Landscaping/vegetation types appropriate inappropriate. . _f fill hauling (consider that this is- Allowable times of .^adsl but is a County road'3%o'coUnt ®f?om'He®nnepin County DOT^s of this writing Any approval would have to be subject to: 1. ) NO fill ot grading within 26- of wetland boundry. 2. ) Erosion protection measures (to ®%°|g°rred ^:rTng^ c1,ns?ru^\?on^-r:ntU “vegetation is established. foT final3. ) consider letter of credit grading/seeding/finish work. i 1 Aoolicant to submit revised plan by surveyo?/eng\neer prior to Council action. .. Tiii PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property rn n _ _ Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: u..n,J!A /.fcc -ir, h./,04^n ded on L-Sii:—- >r more ' of s) required SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Cernter County Depfrtmenrof^PinrncrA-6V3 “G?vernmeit envelopes (»10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. Plat Map. Property Owner must sign this appli'c'a'tionr~'7l'ease not been included! complete if the above information has Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date or APPLICANT* S SIGNATURE Applicant's signaturef < g Date (/OWNERS SIGNATURE acknowledges and agrees to this application and further reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, in%%7tlgat?ora “d"!;erif7c:tL" of%M signature ^ ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date -)_ _ _ _ _ Applicant must have all submittals in'to the City offices 25 days before the Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Mcnday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 et 1 Z* n I \ • ,i)1 ; 1 ^«3 ^ i 1 i - 0 L \ k »•/!» 'VJii / -/- - m ii W : I c050 0^ *,. -*3‘h I I 'rm o to K| Ma • Ulss I lU tt iu H(O M »3O Urn z cnM a UJ giUi Q. >- O H E“iU a o £ N. CON, O o <o CSJo o 5 10 Nooo CM I CO I I!; Ul ^ Uiu S o ^ < o a o; q: -« < o u. ^ r 5^,-if s Ift M Z O2g58g fO lA UJ u .8 o ^ 8I CM I CO COs g DCO i: K»irt in D X3H9S I in COin in NO o U CO ZS3« n S UI 3 < S'"O O =3 U. UJ UI O D «i -i o: cQ Uiu. M o o to CM > ^ < u3 ro I -Ivis CO M 0^ tn oa Z o M a <or >• ro inin i 5m in CM CM o M O ^-I z in ^ CL CJ H UI CM 3 > ^ o “5os = a S o z ao £ a oUi < >• N < lo a rBi c n o Z o M > f::f t I X < 00 M V in 3 I «oin Kl in t “H Ui < > O ^ Ui _ o K* in pKl 2 CM < CO ^ Kl O 3 < Z M -I in to -J Kl z M CM O 3 <r *J gg3 S-1 r--'- toooo inoo o K> CM I m>Am nii ir- ) 9 00 00 CZ of LU LU O O LU LU O O 'Ju ZC ro CM a: q: c < Ll. Lu to LO ro O LO q: id I o ro o o h— h— CO CJ3 (Z < Lu LU C ZD —J 00 ro ZD ZD nz ZLZ 00 00 00 o oo CMo o £u h- 2 <H O H Oa c^inm inin 1 to o g h-in UI i e u Ui £UI a a a o o l'"' '' • 1. i•# ^ ‘-i!: O O UJ z u lO M UI a X c S UI ^ u 2 < < a a 13 u. iE ° Z a M Iii3 S'"UIo u o a ro ro cn o o o o o o o o o oo oo LU LU I—I l-H ro ^ ro CO ro CM CM CM I I I 00 CO 00 Od Od LU LU Cl O. O O ck: od a. a. lO LO CO O LO oz to o o I I I O O »-t CO CO ro CD CD LU LU Od Od o o o z: zc z: >- h- LU z: LU cc 00 00 00 CO C^) CO LU LU c < Ol CD 00 z: 00 o 00 -u i V Miik t j . ^ i . 4 JiUv:r.''', .1 'A'.; if ^ • ’• .1 - , . ■v^ivSikv- k- ‘''' 'VaV V V A •■ r*"- ■••• •- ■' ^^,.’ -V.- ■* '4' :--.A : ■<T^ . i Yi r I > Jl^ ir •• 1^4 .a1 k ^ Tv! S-'Mi ^ >* « V V '' t-i4kr Tm- fe' - i. iti‘ I’., T . I I '-^ ' '*"'•• ■ ^' not not T^ •-.-- , •. iAJin f ^f- IjEV ■ :-.v*^ *i». ^ V i* ; ^ f -' <S •'>». ».'. A » W • ■AT -■■ • # i*f» . 4 -‘I .. .• • ‘- « »>' * i • -.v-'V ■'■“i'-:.v- Ji, S • ^ M' m : Lt' - ,Af c ■•; \t . ’■■■;■’• :'; *^> .JiXL^ t' ^ *#ii '■4>»Wfv.- '-.I ‘ :?f ^ 1^ ^ f-« ^ <t • HO.OH < nr.s / '. •;•* • V.. •.,•** m0. Vi' »V*h^ <4T a i 1' I »■ ^ i- I * i ■ \ To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 15, 1987 Subject #1137 Marc Fritzler/Desyl Peterson, 4385 Chippewa Lane Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-IA Variances Sought for New Construction Second Story Addition Required * 100' Existing = 40.2 Variance = 59.8 or 59% Porch Addition Required = 100' Proposed = 75' Variance =25* or 25% Garage Addition (Ati*ached} Required = 100' Proposed = 65' Variance =35' or 35% List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit 1‘ Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Septic Inventory Card Survey The aoDlicants plan major rehabilitation of existing house in addition to pa^tiaPsecond story addition, attached garage and porch to rear o house. The house was placed on property prior to RR-IA ’ Staff can see no conflict with existing septic (review Exhibit D). Applicant area prior to porch construction especially if new slab Staff has received no negative comments from neighbors. The existing house is located entirely within the required 100 feet setback yard. mti«i ^^5\ vi4dfe ■> &&: . 4 ^ y - ^ tiijat 'X-: .;- ^- %: ■ #1 ■ \ c l r7 #' • I Uu Lu Cl Foe /~ '''’' O y• r ^ Receipt .:, ;: *? Initials 1 ;v CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ‘j/ Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 ^no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^3^5" Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 'X^Opd^ Please check one — Is the property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Phone (home) ^73 "1*4 _ _ _ Name /^/-hz^/gr- 'Pe.fer^or^ Phone (work) ^IZ-lllO Address; Ck:pf>euJq, U-ne. City;AU^k. PU.n Zip; S'^3^ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address;City;Zip; Date Property Acquired (month/year) I rfaiff)' (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY ^^®a®nt Zoning District ^/n</%i/wt/c>v\ Present Use of Property _______fi/v. I Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost cHrt> Describe rr >;» • i in detail; /f/jt O.-H’djCkfd^ 3 5^5^^ /), h)U6£. j n*j^.on^iruc¥ -fa CLcx/&h cni^ir^ -flo' 'arcJ^ j oi~nr',n+-'£ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Front Side Rear) Other HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations t n ^ o fy or sircii.'h* DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements i_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2.Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3.Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date J-JS-'f'I OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ y?_ _ The owner hereby aclcowlerages and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. i . r .Vji V V • .1 VvS S m >oo:a H o -o > j: » X if o •a m T3> :o^ Sm 2 a 30 > a 3 w 525:” —I 3 >r- 5 o ooo 4' (c L 04 •-• I 0> I rvj 04 r%> oo Sgm > N. -< > m a TO a X3 H O 3 > >: » m ou 3m ao;a 04 rovn Mz n X M-a -Dmz > X3 XJ O U4 O O 09 ^ W ^ OlOl a 3P ►- o a m m ES in m 01 r- r-M Mz z O Q O •- Z 09 M I T3 ro 13 04 m Z > rv9 04 01«o m 5S!n ooo ? u ni 13 z z m m o o 04r> O 04 5:5=*^ I mm m m Z 90 H ^ C 09 n I Z m fi 04 Ol Oi 04 oi 'O z Mmm 5 ^rv) 93o o o 3 04 > INJ 040> 13 O m c. c. o 9gSZ Z m O 04mm C5 3 3 .V 52 m m H ►- 9 O m m #• 9» rv3 04 OI OI 04 OI r ^ M 90 3 m moo m o • < zzH m > \ -< > m o 9 o 9 o -n U ”z o m 13 9 > Z O > o 3 9 m m 5ir- 5 9 01 om c/1 9 5: Mz n X M 9 9m I 9m m 9 in •n 9 M m H 9 N M n H m N 9 04 09 01 04 I m m 9 H n X M 9 9m 09 I rj 04 in 01 04 01«o i ooo 3 01 O O ^ ^ C — 9 M ^ 61 r* ^ ^m HO O Q 9 9 Z H9 5:^0 01 I "3S 3S§3 O’ Iro 04 ro inin 04 01 *41 O o 0 01 » TI €C ( EllMb... c H O 9 Z > Z 9 > X Z O 3 9 m 9 m > 9 \ H > >> m Z o a 9 > 3 a 3 9 9 m 03 > H O X o o a 04 09 04 I ro 04 ooo 3 >- > o 9 o m m 9 o r- m o n 9 > 3 M Q fl» o O 04 3 9 M r- = 5m •• X f- •- i 9 M O 01 o 01 m 04 9 9 o >o 01 M in fi? m M 04 01 sins M 04 9 O M O O <3 61 m 3 X* O 9 9 9 O N. ► > r- »- O 01 szSZ o M 01 2 o m 9 01 M 5m 9 01 04 I 01c M Hm o 9 m m X sm 52 09 Iro 04 04ro Omm Mnm X X O 3 m oo i§m 9 01 m9 01 o 04 X 3O9m3 9m 913m 9 M 01 m3"I 52 52 9ms ism • 9 M ►- 04 01 o C 0 1 ooz Tlo 3s zo I I O |5:I \ VN C/) I (/)c PU) H >z O > D O f Cw $ I r-r^ B ^ N Coc*. -'s 2 7 I cz Ooz •n O 2} N zo V Os) 0 s 3o I -r|t=r a. O • ff. S 5 2. =*1• a a2Q- r 9 S 2 <» 01 if II o &M rrocS [ «* o > Hm Z CO •Dm O H Oz 23 mo O 23 O ■'V noS T) >zo m O > Hm O > r* Oz CO -Dc TD Oc H 23 m O O 23 O r O o 35 V O o X 2*X LA .'M aL-METRO LANP SURVEYOHS. __ ___^^ **CFRTIFICATF OF Sori'/FY certificate of survey FOR PAUL AND GINI BOYKE OF LOTS I AND 2. BROOKS GREEN HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA #1116 DESCRIPTION tills 1 ANU 2. BlOCt I. BHOnilS GREEN COFFIN a GRONBERG. INC ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS a PLANNERS LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA «. .