The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-21-1988 Planning Packet-w w •.?. ihhJh'lHb CITY OF ORON PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE nj*llj^i PLEASE PILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1 ^ 7 -C'U. 5.x9.^i A i5ov> •hn • f\Ianc^ Flrhvt C\rv T 1 1.>> t'iti. ^ 50. ,X).A ib ah'^ £^(P/uls> JAy, ^/Y ^1^5 h ?L ^o7 t^tL> ^L>fy I /> 1^ r\'A."\^K l\^ ^.av. \V r'*tDic c ?/I'y 7 /I y>9N c.y 4,am i *13 L I ^/O /5? VO LA -tr/o m: see' K^-m- Ml hv<a .■■•Ij .■^■'..‘ hjiiju £CORDS. NUMBER t (from agenda) mm ^‘i mm mm■■■■.. f- > ■; -!{ ■l' •: ".C m ■'r- •<A wm:m vi '-■to MoroA$!*S^iSrSfm£^7^J^ 1275 BROUN ROM) SOOTH - COUNCIL CBAMBBRS to ill INCIL RBPRBSBNTATIVB - Barbara Peterson attbndaiicb 1. Consent Agenda {*) 4 $, 6. 9. HEARINGS 7:00 P.M.#1349 7:10 P.M.♦1349 7:15 p.m.♦1350 7:45 p.m.*1352 SsOO p.m.♦1354 8:15 p.tt.11351 8:30 p.m. e ♦1357 8:45 p.m.♦1358 loten s Joyce Born, 1420/1432 Shoreline Drive Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangenen Loren s Joyce Born, 1420/1432 Shoreline Drive Vacation of Easements Loren s uoyce — Variances ~ Public Hearing Charles Schoen, 2430/2450 Nortn &note u. subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Robert Merkow t John Charlton, 2340/2380 Abingdon Way - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Alfred Harrison, 1410 Shoreline Drive - Vacation of Basement o Larry Lae, Vacation of Portions of Garden Lane t Hiohview Lane Within Tonkaview Gardens 4 xney In^rl^lst 4 Wicklunds Addn to Bergqulst 4 Wicklunds Park red Peig 4 Tim Johnson, 527/e^^f ^ subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement I^CTION ITSIS (Review of Action Items to Begin at 7:00 P.M.) 10.9,00 p.m. #1302 City of Orono, Crystal ’Conditional Use Permit - Third Review 11. 12. #1337 Robert Paige, 3493 Crystal Place - Variances - Second Review vi;tSncr-*52fe«2d"BSck ?rP?-nn;«; commission by Council m: '•¥ ••'V ■f'i r; 'my I? :yry m ■mi m - PLANNING O 13. #1353 A: 14# #1355 Si O *15. #1356 Gi R( 16. Approval additional its *17. Planning *18. December cancel le< 19. Planning 12, 1988 to b« enacted upon B Consent Item* on oreline Drive ngement oreline Drive - jie Drive - Shore Drive mgement ingement Drive ■ of Garden Lane Gardena * the tdn to Bergquist i Worth femdale »d engesMUit >.N.) res ~ second Revise? lision hf council m m- V. i- ::: i .liiBS II ?h - ^ ■ ■’■it ' PTiMTWTS*^ COMMISSIOH MBBTIV6 - HOlDATr HOVBMBBR 21# 1988 2*80 PJl. II.#1351 John L. FiebelJcorn, 2730 Shadywood Road - After-the-Pact Variances - Public Bearing 14.#1355 Kenneth J. Weasels, 1245 Woodhill Avenue - conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing •15 #1356 Gerald T. McCourtney# 1055 West Femdale Road - Renewal Variances - Public Hearing 16• Approval of 1989 Schedule of Planning C IDDZTXOHAL ZTBNS el»i»lission Meetings •17, Planning Commission approval of October 17, 1988 minuten. *18. December 19, 1988 meeting of the Planning Commission has been cancelled. 19. Planning Cownla.ion to sslact a r.pr.aentativ. to attand th. Dacnl 12, 1988 Council meeting. • ’ I r < ' • •• • r * # 'f&f . \ ,V;-‘rVtJ w m r jiMnai li tido tJN. tings utss • \ has bean Itand tha Dacambar 'mmmi- 9bi Planning Coininission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson 1^1 I Jeann* A. Mabuath, Building a Zoning Administrator MmCA -: Oatas November 15, 1988 Subjacti #1349 t.auren t Joyce Born, 1420 Shoreline Drive - A) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement, Class I Public Hearing - 7:00 p.m. ■ i ’ B)Vacation of Portions of a Drainage & Utility Easement within Lot 2, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill - Public Hearing - 7:10 p.m. Partinant Sactlons of tha Code - Section 10.12 - vacation of public utilities and drainage easements section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) - Lot standards for the LR-IA zoning district. of the City Code. Halper will be under the required 2 acres. The Halper property (unsewered) Parcel A: Existing - 2.09 acres (91,040 s.f.) Required ■ 2 acres ,09 acres * wet (3,920 s.f.) 2 acres • dry (87,120 s.f.) Proposed - 1.97 acres (85,813.2 s.f.) .09 acres dry 1.88 acres dry (82,059 s.f.) f- Tha Born property (sewered) Parcels B 6 C: Existing - .186 acres (8,135 s.f.) Required • 2 acres (87,120 s.f.) Proposed “ .3 acres (13.196 s.f#) ml- iP mm:wm. m k fi. V \ ! ■if: : V. Mmm puum 13. #133 14. #135 *15. #135 16. Appz ADDZTZOHM *17. Plan *18• Dace canc 19. Plan 12p ADJOOS•lirJi.i:-' A-S' y :or I - 188 I - f Ea8ement; inage eassiaents. r the LR-IX *oning iiired because both :he toning chapter t 2 acres \ : 7-:m:•;,v| IPLAiniXlfG CONMISSZOH MBBTI1I6 - NOMDAT, HOVlDIBBR 21, 1988 7s 00 PJN. #1353 John L. Fiebelkorn, 2730 Shadywood Road - After-the-Pact Variances - Public Hearing #1355 Kenneth J. Weasels, 1245 Hoodhill Avenue Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing #1356 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Pemdale Road Renewal Variances ** Public Rearing ' •#. t# f ♦v h Approval of 1989 Schedule of Planning Commission Meetings ADDITIONAL ITBI8 *17* Planning Commission approval of October 17, 1988 minutes. *18. December 19, 1988 meeting of the Planning Commission has been cancelled. 19* Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the Decei 12, 1988 Council meeting. ler e;n I Ui'-* • \ 5■..-.r'Ti il '•■I Nr Ih ' y . /' w ^ ir Zoning P Hovember Page 2 o List of Exh Exh Exh Exh Exh Exh A. Subd The wide CO Parcel 1 propert; involve! along tl* exchange will as] 5* on ei located requirin meets t contain! PrJ confirme Lot 2 f< severe also no' caution fence tt would r area. T of Mr. subdivii request im 7t00 WM. Lnutes• m hat bttn attend tha Oacambar Ml -I'■iiiiiHi Zoning File #1349 November 15, 1988 Page 2 of 4 List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E - Application - Property Owners List - Plat Map - Pinal Survey - Lot 2, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill - Preliminary Survey - Lot 2, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill * Topographic Plus Area Confirmation Exhibit P - Subdivision of Lot Line Rearrangement - Metes 6 Bounds Descriptions A. Subdivision Application - The proposed division involves the separation or division of a 37,03' corridor from the southern portion of Lot 2, Block 1, defined as Parcel B on the survey, Exhibit P, to be combined with the Born homestead property defined as Parcel C on that same survey. The application also involves the vacation of a 10' wide drainage and utility easement platted along the southern lot line of said Lot 2 in the Dragonfly Hill plat. In exchange for the vacation of the drainage and utility easements, the City will ask that the Helpers and Borns execute drainage and utility easements 5' on either side of the new division line. The subject properties are located within the LR-IA zoning district, lakeshore residential district, requiring 2 acres in area. The Helper property is unsewered and currently meets the 2 acre standard. The Born property is severely substandard containing merely a .186 acres in area but is sewered. Prior to filing the subdivision application with the City, Gaffron confirmed for the applicants that the 37* wide corridor would never serve Lot 2 for future septic expansion or a future well site because of the severe 22'*^ grade change (review Exhibit E). The new division line will also not require any setback variance for existing structures. The only caution that staff would offer the applicant is that the existing privacy fence that runs along the current division line, if replaced by applicant, would require a variance because of its location within the 75* setback area. The division will greatly improve the severely substandard property of Mr. Born, Parcel C. It should be noted for the record that the subdivision and vacation application are separate from Mr, Born's variance request scheduled for immediate review after the public hearings. Born of tl in ai WOUli necei i Hill onfly Hill - etes & Bounds rlsion of a 37.03* ::k Ir defined as te Born homestead ipplication also easement platted .y Hill plat. In sements# the City utility easements t properties are dential districtr red and currently rely substandard ie City, Gaffron ould never serve B because of the rision line will tures. The only existing privacy :ed by applicant, t the 75* setback ■tandard property record that the . iom*s variance arings. ?*■ . .-Uj ■;4i |t4': ^ A h ■ ■■■ m J J ■mmmm^v'vV;V.l I C "•.^1 W . >:~>4 V wmmmmm Zoning File #1349 November 15, 1988 Page 3 of 4 Staff Recn—andatlon - To approve the subdivision for a lot line rearrangement for Lauren Born and David Halper and an area variance for Lot 2, Block 1 as a result of this realignment based on the following findings: 1. The 37* wide corridor cannot be used for a new well location or for septic expansion because of the 22*t variation in grade from the higher elevations of the Halper property used for current residential development. 2. Proposed division line corresponds with natural physical/topographic boundaries. 3. The subdivision does not involve the creation of new building sites, but merely involves the rearrangement of a shared boundary. 4. The rural property, defined as Parcel A on the survey, has a new primary septic system and additional area for septic expansion in the future. 5. All existing structures on Parcel A meet the required setbacks from the proposed division line. This approval would be subject to Mr. Born filing for legal combination of Parcel B with Parcel C. For members who cannot approve a division that involves the reduction in area of a rural property that would require an area variance, staff l#ould recommend that you refer to Section 11.02, Subdivision 10 for the necessary findings for denial. S. Vacation Application If the proposed division is approved, the existing 10' wide drainage end utility easement along the southern lot line of Lot 2, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill (review Exhibit D) must be vacated and the City will ask in return for the granting of a S' drainage and utility easement on either Side of the new division line. The existing drainage and utility easements would intersect the newly defined building envelope of combined Parcel B & C. Mr. Halper and Mr. Born have agreed to execute drainage and utility € easements upon approval of the subdivision. ] pi .1 •r Zoning Novernb^ Page 4 Staff 1 e)iib 1 v-:| angement for Lauren Block 1 as a result iv well location or on in grade from the current residential Is with natural Lon of new building shared boundary. le survey# has a new tic expansion in the B required setbacks filing for legal rolves the reduction :ea variance, staff iivision 10 for the ng 10' wide drainage Bf Lot 2# Block 1# the City will ask in easement on either nd utility easea»nts eoaibined Parcel 1 i reinage and utility ■V:' 1:28?. 1 mm U 1^1 ■ V m :mm lie I \m ■: mm ‘ri m ir: (/l .. ^ )V* .1,■fr^ih4 WM • • - : ^i i Zoning file #1349 November 15# 1988 Page 4 of 4 Wr Staff ReeoaMAdation - If the proposed lot line rearrangement is approved# staff would recommend the vacation of the drainage easements as noted above# subject to the condition that both applicants execute 5' wide drainage and utility easements along the proposed division line. ■ y%*. ■& to ■'•-i rnmmmm i •is? hi If' I : ■ . mSTIHG NUSL DeV' Pre Pre PROPOSAL MIHIMOM MATER 1.Complete* 2.Prelimin. 3.Certifie* this 11s 348-3271 4*Stamped# names on obtained 5.As an ad any othe Certi£lcatlo; .f ^rim ' (you tnust obtain A-603 Govt Center sd to each of the te address labels separate list of ion. it Application is ite ter assessnents)• al plat. ation is c ate • Ml •lete. $150.00 250.00 ial)300.00 20.00/XiOt 150.00* *«j.wn required or City Attorney# Ls at^lication and ordinance. lo^TT S days before the I are heldl on the St all scheduled t an applicant Is isents to have an lull dine ii looine ' -u,'V 11/ - 'v ^1- Al ^ A#-i: ^ ;V- ;m . .iUiife'.« ■ . X 31It :• : ■ CBRTIFICATB OP MAILIHG STATE OF MINNESOTA ) wm COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) 88 ) CITY OF ORONO ) • x I « *h. cltv of Orono, Hennepin County, I, Jamie Boama, tha^ a Notice of Public Hearing Minnesota, do hereby **„a8 mailed to the attached list concerning the matter oi of property owners in Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 9th day of November, 1988. ■ r L..; .m Jai Bosnia PP VsJ, A •;iM ^ i % -I- 'y • W‘-'' ■ W- 4 ^ ' =%# v/11 * ^ % m Sd 'r*j^■■■ - ▼ Tipmm:im..-PHV^'■■ ''VvT JjH SlA^r Doe No-4S‘ <>c z r% UJz ^ CQ llJ :iC < Mcya ntt •v% I 5 «Q m • • • • I • « I • • ' L •* #. ’»^'’** •'* * - .*■ *•*■: •* k ** ** * . .M M »tM I -iS SSS' ■ • 4TO/J4#..; J • - ..... OUTLOT S * - -fB • •> ^ •<•■ 4. • ,PPT To:Plann Orono City Fri Jeann Date:Novem Subject: #1350 Varia If the Pla the applicant Council makes a Pertinent Ordlni Section 10 Requl Exist Exist Propos Origli Propoj Section 10. proposed ac Requi] Exist: Propoi Variai Section 10. Prior C I I After G H E F to: Froai: Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 16, 1988 Subject: #1350 Lauren & Joyce Born, 1420 Shoreline Drive - Variances ~ Public Hearing If the Planning Commission chooses to deny application #1349, advise the applicant to request the tabling of the variance application until Council makes a final determination on the proposed lot line rearrangement. Pertinent Ordinances *- Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore setback regulations. Required ■ 75* Existing Garage « 16* Existing House * 45* He Proposed Addition ■ 17* Original Variance = 59* or 78.6% Proposed Variance ■» 58* or 77% Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side setback variance required for proposed addition. Required » 30' Existing ■ 45* (12* to original division line) Proposed *■ 24.8* Variance ■ 5.2* or 17% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Hardcover variance 0«‘75* setback area. Prior to Subdivision: 0-75' Setback Area ■ 5,490 s.f. Allowed ■ C s.f. Existing s 2,563 s.f. or 47% After Subdivision: 0-75' Setback AreS • 9,267 s.f. Allowed •» 0 s.f. Existing * 2,563 s.f. or 27% Proposed ■ 1,973 s.f. or 21% 1 ■ > • i : Jl facts. Floor) veSf patiOf andi to construct a 29.3*x24.2'). Th« |e at the street .tional expansion ir and additional has been alignod £ro» the 929.4 ' the shoreline* %lf 17 ‘ fro« the jP^i • 'Um- : i m a-’l* m : ;•:; .^T3n^ 'l>-rnm& .‘mitm 'iM'H/ Zoning File #1350 November 16^ 1988 Page 3 of 5 The addition will also require a side setback variance from the new division line from the north. The existing house on the south side is approximately 21' from the south lot line and the existing lakeshore garage is approximately 3.6’ from the lot line. If the applicants are asked to meet the 30* setback at the northeast corner of the proposed addition, 20'8" would not provide adequate width for a garage to function for two stall use. At an earlier meeting with the applicants, staff asked the Borns if the addition could be moved closer to the street as there appeared to be adequate depth. The City would be more comfortable approving a street setback variance by reducing the severe lakeshore setback proposed at 17* at the northwest corner of the addition. The applicants advised that this would not be a problem for the placement of the garage, but because of their desire to expand the living area of the limited first floor, it was imperative that they align the addition with the existing lake side of the house. The survey has located the existing house on the south side in order to determine if there would be a visual impact on the lakeshore views. The proposed addition will not encroach any closer into the lakeshore views of the resident to the south. The Helper property was not included because of the higher elevations. The Helpers will receive no visual impact from the proposed addition on the Born property. The City has received no negative cosonents from the neighbors notified for this review. Note the applicants' survey does net designate a walkway from the garage to the existing front door steps. The crushed landscaping around the front steps has an underliner and would be considered as hardcover. Review Exhibit K, note this specific area is out of the 75* setback area. The 75-250’ setback area proposed at 14% total hardcover would allow an increase for the 60 s.f. of crushed landscape area and a walkway not to exceed a 4* width for a distance of 20' at 80 s.f. The 75-250’ hardcover facts should be adjusted to include the additional total of 140 s.f. of hardcover. ^4^. . • :7. ■ V;; X1 ' •I- ''1 Pt'" 1 r-.: Zoning File November 16 Page 4 of f Staff Recoi To api Joyce Born Shoreline I fy*' h * 2. I hardc impro This 2. fina Insp :e from the new le south side is lakeshore garage Its are asked to »posed addition, unction for two ked the Borns if e appeared to be proving a street proposed at 17* dvised that this , but because of St floor, it was lake side of the th side in order tore views. The Iceshore views of luded because of sual impact from las received no .ew. likway from the dscaping around id as hardcover. 5* setback area, would allow an walkway not to -250' hardcover 1 of 140 s.f. of !w .m-r- ..-l ‘3- :?T: •• •,f v ' wfe ' '9^'"\o- » 9*^-M. - t5{ K.4 ;> =.v •/a '►• •• ; :y ■■*7=' ria : ■ <4 Zoning File #1350 November 16, 1988 Page 4 of 5 .’etbadc .nd hardcover variances sought by Tnvc. Born for the proposed addition to the existing residence at 142 ShLeline Drive, based on the following findings and hardships: 1 The applicants have demonstrated good fait by acquiring additional i'rea adlacint to their property in order to enlarge their severly limited homestead. 2 in reviewing the hardcover facts, the applicants have reduced hardcover within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback rones with the proposed improvement of the property. 0-75* Reduction « 6% 75-250* Reduction ■ 10% 3 The major addition to the existing structure will provide no visual impact for the surrounding t^rhigher the location of the residence structure to the south and the g elevations of the property to the north. 4. The removal of major concrete areas on the property and replacing with crass will provide greater absorptive surface for the ru “ceivel frLlie n'^orth property and the property to the south with excessive hardcover. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicants must obtain a permit from the County Highway Department for the creation of the new curb cut. 2 All hardcover scheduled for removal must be removed «nal inspection for the new construction by the Orono Building Inspector. 3 Applicants are placed on notice that if the existing 1, to be removed as a result of this construe ^ of the existing fence or any proposa i..K4ri 75*or rne ejixau* ^ ^ «,.f-tions located within the 75require City approval for fence section setback area. j " *’4 :.. m Zoning ] Novembe: Page 5 « OR OR 5. 1,J?* jht by Lauren and BSldence at 1420 hips: airing additional je their severly nts have reduced with the proposed will provide »o rties because of h and the higher rty and replacing i for the run-off o the south with Highway Department soved prior to the ne Orono Building ng privacy fence t the relocation new fence will within the 75* sm i «7i. ■> ? V 1 ■3FKr^-:■HMf 'fX .4■■ii-i:iis '■■1' '■y: ■ y . ( • h 'i': Zoning File #1350 November 16, 1988 Page 5 of 5 4. options available to Planning Commission regarding a side setback! variance: OR I .mmy OR A) Setback to be maintained as proposed at 24.8’. B) Setback to be realigned at a 26*, or 27*, . . to meet required 30* setback. side setback C) Setback to meet required 30* setback 5, Options on lakeshore setback for new construction: A) Lakeshore setback to be maintained as proposed at 17 B) Lakeshore setback to be a minimum of _? elevation, and to grant appropriate street construction. * from the 929.4 setback for new .# . ?i A ■ •W!• m-:; i W cv^ c Initia ($5C Renews (no After- PROPEI Site 2 Propel Pleas< Attacl requi; APPLI' OWNER PRBSi DBSa VARL g a side setback side setback fd at 1?». • from the 929.4 setback for new * VPy :/-ij &'r^ '-A It--;: :f:v :5 -•?(' .• •■.■■■•I \?. • • II-. ^ 1>-I TT”’^ ¥\Q *CO CI*^ OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original applicatio;^ ^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) <D» e-D J PROPERTY LOCATION Site _^ ^ Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^^So ^ (/ abstract or _____ torrens? ®TY LOCATION Address / ^ 3 ^ Property Please check one - Property Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _-— Phone (home) UJiiiLrL^APPLICANT Name Phone (work) Address: /U A*^City!Zip;^33 ^Ll— ■«* ^ _ _ __ _ _ _mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm •• ONNBR (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Address: Phone (work) City:Zip: (month/year)Date Property Acquired_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ I (do) C9o no^ also own the adjacent PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Presealt Zoning District present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) dbscriftk REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other A::.Lr^ W ■A 1^9 ♦ll .£ - J N i! ■i :W- HARDSHIP Descr enfor DESCRIPTIO Descr Code REQUIRED S Compl Certi this 348- "t^I name! obtai Certi Topog in e> Plat As ar any c Addit The Appli remember informatic Certifical Zoning Ofi APPLICANT The appl requested unusual e: the infoi knowledge Applicant OWNERS Sl< The owner authorize agents# C tion and Owner’s S Applicant Planning third Moi review me unable tc authorize Office of m fmm^ bardship Describe undue enforcement of DESCRIPTION OF OHOSDAL PROPERTY COITOITIONS op'r compliance with Zoning iL - - - - (p REQUIRED SUBMITTALS owner? List of owners «fthin Sovt tillerthis list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A 603 Govt center ‘legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed ®ach of the names on the^above list with no return address (use address labels ?er?if ioate?f ?u?v?y ^nTluding^^aVdcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any chang in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list}. ^ AS L addUdum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4. 5. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this ‘ f remember that your variance application is not complete information has not been included. Certification'by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Date _ _ __Zoning Official's Signature $S:“a^?can?^I^by agrees to provide all required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees ® Snusual expenses incurred in review of this “PP^^tion, and certifies that the inforLtion supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge Applicant's Signature ONMERS SIGNATURE 0 Date The^wner hereby acltowledges and agrees to this application *“^**1^' aUthoJ^izes reasoLble entry onto the property by City staff, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of inve g tion and verification of this ^quest. Owner's Signature - -—_ _ _ ' ** ^ jm t ^ P ^ A ado 1 leant”musVha^^ all submittals into the City offices 25 ® Planning Commission Meeting. Planning third Monday of each month. Applicants must be Voo, Enable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buil a Office of this change prior to the meeting. ma"i hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict zoning T-orpnlations; Lv.T»w Av^\X)( H- - - - - - - - - - -- I '■mm ■i*- '. 4Tm M • till S!Sa IIIm ii I 9fHl § m Is IK 1CK IS 2: E SI s tL 5m m K w( O i a m. ss OK > O O M o « ^ M S M < 8 M M H K >n«i III K tu tfl Ml III > a: X V8S2S,::s..s£ Ml O •> tfl M ly o Kl MM lA -i Ml N) M lA fA Mi K or Xeg CK Ml ui MEg g M K K X M M Ml X m tt ft g E CL a X Ml K •ie M Ml Ml < !SSl|m M O “I n eg ^ ft M S •*3 * M Ml i Al ft ft C I Q Ml - K £ ft M M > ■ K IM M#• 5 > > -eBP ^ A ^pp2 IM 2 B ft ft ft E 29.. 7 ft ft §CM n o Ml Ml <-a**;e a. X 10 o A11 €1-1 - M ih ■.ggy_______.JL2 (you must, obtain -603 Govt Center to each of the address labels i as required. ) if any changes separate list of 5n. ft ly ^ ft X ^ S ft c -23 22 0 ORELINC 1 ER LPEE LINE OR 1 55391:;S<«g2 i *“*1^• ;i;ii -S^BoS cation. Please te if the above I 3n is complete te on required or 11 fees and/or i certifies that est of his/her 2 \h ■ h §is A 8 ss IM 8?; ff% m CM (K I tfi tfi CM CM g?; 1: iL- tion and further iff# consultants, i#s of investiga- >» X M M ttl Z 9S a ft a C lAJ CM I *>f ly ft zS!“ills I .4 N m «> <i%ni "t Z ^ M S S ;3 >. *1sI lays before the re held on the all scheduled n applicant is nts to have an Iding s Zoning I 8 I Mf ft 10 •e CO I ft &2: ft CM M ft ft <n < g m m «A 2 m eC i lirl>- N MJ_ Ih 3S1I ft H M H ft ft mS88 iiii m MM * I t. ■ . 1 ■-I ,oto N/ ioc u A ft* cn O .* - n-ji!ii^ U4 f (0 «c •H b« Cs) I oo n %o B I 0 • M « K M K ft %<•1,^ « ••• 4, ' 'v. p-4 iO «aou ft* u > Oo<o i4 to X f»^ 40c m I 01c •H i4 I c •H»a 01c •H iJ •o 0» >i 01 X 01.a £ •o «S:s 04 •I «M CO 0 oo r-4 a - H c -#< m ••4 H X U 01 >oo•ow •oft 0)a 2 0« ftc ftc 04 %4 ft 04 ft IM ft t 04 04 m o* ft Oo 04 « 04 -tP4 M 4# U t ft ua ^ ••4 44 Cft ft ft ft 6 U M ft ft ft M ^ 4# «0 ft ft U ft a ft *o ft ft 3 J0 04 14 ft 44o I z P4 I§ i § lAf lx i;<ii - «■* . - fi-: V ■^:m:ii:£^-''.. ’-, :t0-;4,i:.:mm' W '. . 'm ■ ■V;-: ^->/v v V-. V-- ... -*t:v ...^ ;• ; SM //if €350 wm ■ W • s •.•• • ^ 'K';i ' . ^ W; -: .-. . .: • • *. v;^:;: ■.;;^u" mmm.k p •.r‘y •, m :» ’*'■ ttlfii^t^.. '«.yti^. 1 ■ ?•• :* •m!”’3r.:£- .ix mm n \i\' :k>v%.-; , -V. " ■ w ■1(«~ • fc •« ■ V* ■S' ■ '■ '■. .p-:\,'V ^ " : :ir' ■■ ' mmi ,^4 ..'-^-W ;4 f-. ■■■ .- 4‘- : -? , . , , ■ ... -.1 ■ '■ Stei'iatM •..’ .y .; . I '.- ■ ’.^»g. : K.!-.;-, ■«>■ .,*H . . ■ * . ;. ** :.Vf ttJ . • -« V. . ';V' IS-SIsi V: .f . ■>'•.'■ ':■' <1 . ,..®f....^|?\^3^,-. •;'il^.'.. ■• -,Jt • . ,.r ->•" •,. ..’ :^^ -. '"■? y - ■ •*. --' ^iV : yi^Vy ■' ' ■■• -^.. *.m -i. ' i“. m ” ■ :'m^ - y •f!'' 4l#S^.f-«/:::,,,ip K#:' SKs*^EBB • :.=A ^K-'h ‘'‘‘tf'"'vv ■ V’» » i • • ♦ ■r - /■ :.•».' sS -VP ^ » \1 • . * . •♦ ^ i w-s -/i-'»p: .: ■' -y: ■ ‘ -' m0 Vy &a^ . I mkv:i^fRpttS.,..il I S-.r- •. .--y’ :* ■. - ' 4 #1350 m T ;. .. J-^ Jy]^||i]jH toi Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson froas Datet Michael P. (Saffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 9, 1988 $Ub:|OOts #1352 Charles Schoen/Sheldon Jacobs, 2430 & 2640 North Shore Dr Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Application - Transfer of 1.39 acre parcel from Schoen to Jacobs* Xoning District - RR-lB List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit 0 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Plat Map With Staff's Notations Topographic Survey With Staff's Notations Survey With Proposed Division Copy of Wetland Air Photo Pertinent Pacts - Schoen owns Lot 1 of Kathleen's French Lake Addition, which contains a major wetland, that separates the dry buildable land into two distinct areas. 2.Jacobs proposes to purchase the dry land portion that is not contiguous with the Schoen residence. The portion to be transferred to Jacobs is 1.39 acres in area, 98% of which is dry land. 3.This leaves Schoen with approximately 17 acres of contiguous dry buildable including his residence parcel, and increases Jacobs' dry buildable to approximately 14.5 acres. Discnssii This is a logical lot line rearrangement, to place dry land that is contiguous with the Jacobs' property under Jacobs' control. Both properties remain well in excess of the minimum zoning requirements. Staff Recommendation ~ reconunends approval of the proposed lot line rearrangem^t • iAPPLICAHT ;v *ii CITT OF O FBOFBRTT LbCATIOB * sued; Site Address, Property Identificat Please check one - P: Attach legal descrip Name CJvbt I Address i l 4" OflHER (if different Name Address: (attach list i EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax P Development Siz present Use (ch Present Zoning PSOPOSAL Number of B Proposed Gr Minimum Lot Proposed Cfs nm^.'mT :.rNi»>'■^7.- ator th Shore Dr ring ba contains a two distinct that is not I transferred itiguQua dry I Jacobs* dry land that is trol. Both lents. •TT*-mimm - ■■‘tli - SOBDIVISIOII AFFLICamOH kj^'PcAU Q ^ ^ Ul iUWII rr ii»I^wl/ a W PB0PBRT7 LOC3IXIOB Site address \/79f~3 /I f' (/ '_:t- •<« 7J4.-J 9 A/i a/Caw/ aw/ w • ■ % Property Identification Number r in - H'JO Please check one - Property abstract or torrens?^ i attach legal description to _ _ __ _ _____ _ ___ _-_ _ _ _ _ _ !Phone (home) ^f^3 ■_ Phona (work) — Address Vo </-7^y-^ >^r_ CitytiV^^caai^i^ lomsR (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) Address s , - - - --- - - -v(attach list if more than one) City’:Zip: BXZST1H6 LAinO USB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size / US^ Acres Dry Land iOo£ Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels w> e»-Pm- » S wiee- Present Use (check)Residential; no. of uni^ ^ Other (specify) ^ PROPOSAL .<a4-rnfH- Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites ^ . Number of Building Sites:Existing Onits New Units I Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Total Units m Units per ^Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land __ Residential “ Other (specify) • • m ^ • • # m 2. 3. MINIMUM MATERIA 1. Completed Preliminar Certified this list 348-3271). Stamped, names on t obtained w As an adde any other 4. 5. Certification 1 complete• Zoning Official 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of Signed cerl Title opind Easements, Developers Certification bj Zoning Official* FEES X' Sketch PI Prelimina Prelimina Final Pla ♦(Plus an The applicant ; requested by th Planning Commiss further agrees tc Applicant's Sigm Owner's Signature Applicant must h^ Planning Commissj third Monday of review meetings c unable to attend authorized agent Office of this ch •^SssmBt<•«» •• «. 4»_ • ' ■• - ■ - fi :ik r*« t; ir*A^7T ». ^ /'. | ■ • w .• I M/ l»l IWW4% *n 14* -r,-, A.} k»W V 9 VV - a*i^Ttr.\ .^AAl r-.'if 7-»i • «#VVA IWA /▲*▼ .;«r •w W*'* V » w o5" • % 1123. rWyoo <’>r^9( -» • ’O * *lii ■ - •• - • ♦ ^ yt rf • ragasaaiMi ing sittts) Jicrss LildabI# Land I - ^ 1^ 4* 1 ■« f-- :g^' .;# ■"’ ■■•'■•• *» >• iK r iAk>.< •:=r-- •'••>.vir4. ...;^ 2. 3. MIHUfON NATBRIAL NBCBSSART FOR CQMPLBTB PRELIMINARY APPLICATIOjf 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain ,ir?? County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center348-3271)• stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. 5. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is OOllkjplQtl0l • Zoning Official's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date FEES X Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential)300.00 t 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges)150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and to P®y ®H additional fees established by ordinance# Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date /V- -/o "/rS Date iT -- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CITY In ac( we W01 licen; requi: ation You a; CM.First Ad^rl ij ( Phon4 I unc X mJILOtNC A ZONB^C .4SSESSLNO ; ■• . •. • I* -- ' i' r..Jm- 1 must obtain 3 Govt Center each of the Irese labels rate list of plication is tsessments) • it. is complete. $150.00 230.00 300.00 ^ 20.00/Lot 150.00* required or if Attorney* .ication and nee. /O t before the held on the L scheduled pplicant is to have an ng & Zoning ................ ^ 4 mmmmms { CITY OF QRONO CITYrf ORONO Poit Office Box 66*Cryetal Bay. Minneeota 56323•Municipal Offioea On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY 1. 2. In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform ation. • ♦ You are notified that; The information you furnish will be used co your qualification for the permit or license requested. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. The information may be shared with other local, state or- federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. If your requested permit or license reqaires Council action to approve, some information may become public. You have certian rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. 3. 5. 6. k S O- First _ # Middle a /c^TM _ Last /p/LJ Address Date of brrtK <d6eB~not apply to buildihg/general permits) Phone I understand rigMis as ^ated above. •UlLfMNG a ZONINO assessing Signature 475TJST • ♦ ACMIINISTRA7ION 4 FINANCE - 473-T3IS RffljC WORKS - 473-7359 DESCRIPTIC a Jk TT I Those P4 plat the of the 5 Coir No. 0 d A, des 521 of deg dis Tra 158 The October ! 1 i- ■i1 ■ '• j ■i • ju-i■ - .t • .. Li;.. ma •• * 4»« .n ii.. i II"'m: um •i :•■ :■•■ / •■: 1 V i.. BiltiL' j‘- '■' ■■ :v ii ri:r .-•.>> ‘V- •.:H- ii mM fRbPOS^ urr Ufj"^ i-v iiiik';: / ■ '• iPW^-"=-3:\. V mm Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Date: Michael P. Gaffron^ Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 9, 1988 Subject: #1354 Robert & Margaret Merkow/John & Phyliss Charlton, 2340 & 2380 Abingdon Way - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Application - Revise lot line between two properties. Zoning District - RR-IB List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Pertinent Pacts - 1. Each existing lot exceeds 2.0 acres in area. The proposed realignment of the lot line will result in a slight increase (.02 acre) in the property at 2380, and an equivalent decrease in the property at 2340. 2.The reasons for the proposed rearrangement Include expansion of the Merkow front yard, as well as allowing their driveway to be located further west. 3.Existing and future drainfield sites are not affected by this rearrangement• Discussion ~ This is a simple lot line rearrangement, and would appear to be reasonable and of benefit to both property owners. Staff finds no problems with the proposed realignment. Note that the new line will not line up with the existing drainage and utility easements. It is the applicants' intent to grant new drainage and utility easements over the new line, and as of this writing, applicants' surveyor notes that it is their intent to proceed with a vacation of the existing drainage and utility easement. The surveyor also notes that there are apparently no existing utilities that would be affected by this move. Since the issue of easement vacation was not brought up until after the subdivision applicaticci <>^as filed and notice published, the vacation will be the subject of a .-juhriequent application, for review at your next meeting. Staff Recommendation ** Staff recommends approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement, subject to granting of new drainage and utility easements over the new dividing line, with the intent that the existing easements will eventually be vacated. lignment I in the t 2340. n of the located' hf this r to be ;>robIeas line a{> Licants* Lne, and itent to nt. The Les that after vacation >ur next igea«fit« the ne^ _r*lii I.'u; n fc. •■= %■M it ■ : 1 } ^ ,;'VT■Mi Bi ¥^B'r i-ns'i /s-s" H- mrf^' #1 jhr OF OROHO - SUBDIVISlOH AP SOPSRTY LOCATZOH ’ nXnKTC ~rr^nrL A .. • T! ^ Lu wi»r. tn Lf •- ■• 7_-.-,A.*,,') Jli.w\/-VVVVV \M rry ^-'\00iLU\f TLtUL:f\ tL I t-* _ -•TtOaiw'V .1 W 2 /ie^f'caoA^ (a^4y iC0A/& Lte Address Ay?/ya.'ay . C/^k:^ ^TbSC^ 03U7 Z3 Z3 con loperty Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0'bU7 ^3 Op iZ rjCi c T. T* TiJA i.v vn; itsu^ kmAi j silnitn t uU 1 't m/ 7 A f ‘f t{ : i ^'t } i i }'r•-.*•* **rr^xwu'.tv.' uvv'4 #^vj^ ivu*- lease check one - Property abstract or torrens?/ A/ro • * JL V/ Ct.'/ W ^tach legal description to application PPLICAHT Robert t-MerKou)’^:jS3-^s^i ^^/AJ6-O0/U ou/^ Address: *2^^ A6/AJ&0t?/O CU^City:Zip: ONNER (if different than applicant)Pitone (home! Name Phone (work) Address:Cltv:Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels _2^_m Development Size 5*./y Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land • Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)X Residential; no. of units ^ Other (soecifv) Present Zoning District PKOPOSM. 2< Division for Tax Purposes IiOt Line Rearrangement Only (no nef# building sites)t Subdivision for New Building Sites ZNumber of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units t -k Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Z_ _ Units per Acres Proposed Use: (check) SA /ZO Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSAl 1. Completed Applicatic Preliminary Plat inJ Certified Property < this list fr..a Henn< 348-3271). Stamped, legal siz names on the above obrained with propei As an addendum to tl any other persons yc Certification by Zoning complete• Zoning Official's Signati: Payment of fees (par Signed certificate c Title opinion. Easements, Covenants Developers Agreement lertification by Zoning D Zoning Official's Signatu Sketch Plan Review Preliminary Review Preliminary Review Final Plat Review *(Plus any legal o Che applicant hereby a< requested by the Zoning Planning Commission and C further agrees to pay all applicant's Signature £ owner's Signature crlicant must haall s ^danning Commission Meeti; ‘ hird Monday of each mont eview meetings of the Pl^ n.^le to attend a achedu uthorized agent attend ii ffice of this change prii t' ■ 1 •• .■': •mm!mm ■mMm^: I :••«:■• r.i • )M»* '*.!• mnH" \ f fc- ■ amm r.'-.-Ac^ Pi ^m•;^ • w«u •ni7 ^•nrsTT • lif=4# •liWM i i IT37 A^'r --::n- V:=i* •■•-v:- »1V»TI liVtli ilViTi • ^m»: mitmm) mm able Xtind # 'xanning <jommis8ion ana council necessary to process tnis application ana farther agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. '/TJ^iUmTlP pplicant's Signature ~\ ^ _ _ _ Date -0 mmx'm Signature /?■ nn^.prz:J t// ^ ^0 to /0/^c/^^ pplicant must hav^all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the lanning Commission Meeting. Planning Commisfjion Meetings are held on the hird Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled eview meetings of the Planning Coimnission and Council. If an applicant is nable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an uthorixed agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning ffice of this change prior to the meeting. foli;- ' • • —'^1 * . . . "■W«*3 ••- ■' •'■ e'.; ■•. <*. « 4 f . -/to.>• P‘4». « ‘ 'J -^c / ‘ ;■ • ■■ •# # % . •. . f ^.' (,* f ^. V • • f 7737? • %. 4, |-v,;.K.^ t Vv-iv; •f=j Ml;.. MM&S S9||i“A -•-‘93 •«"S! ^l:hs i |lg| I ill C> O MS • .*S— s| 8|-:s? l«l _ K HI fS “8'“C..8 HI X tt H •4iztsSssSa mi «J Of HI HI HI ^:-2 "If 8>3dsf f«li SIssil! 3Eg8•-•as .jlVyI \ Kill %ialii^si:^8S8«SSP% HI 8»oSi 00*^HlOy m■5: -■!>;;■;■;•■■ ■:.^^ ■? / •f- *"^Jl ♦ '1 “H; . i «. ■"■" !p''i ■ ■ ri •» im .^'. -'V ;• ■•■ ?■ f: r ^ *r' Plan Oron City Mich Novem Subject: #13 1410 Vacat Application - that is no zoning District List of Exhibit Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Pertinent Pacts During sta apparent i the existi on the pro of the por boundaries 2*Staff appi the formal the Conser from the 1 exceeds th 3.The appli portion of the draina Discussion ~ Please rev #1844, in 1981 rectangular pen court is now lo Note that prior to the r< drainage easese; to make the adj iP II iiii'iyifl^wy'Lj^-./ ••; • I- . ,I- :.- -^--:v*i%i|||^•.-.otv > •> Tos Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FroBs Michael P. Gaffron» Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator DBte:November 9, 1988 Subject: #1351 Jensen Homes, Inc./Alfred & Ingrid Harrison, KIO Shoreline Drive - Vacation of Conservation and Flowage Easement - Public Hearing Application - Vacation of a portion of a Conservation and Flowage Easement that is no longer needed. Zoning District - LR-IA List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Resolution #1844 & Phase I Plan From 1985 Approval Pertinent Pacts ~ 1.During staff review of applicants' proposed tennis court, it became apparent that the tennis court was to be located less than 26' from the existing Conservation and Flowage Easement for a pre-existing pond on the property. However, it was further determined that as a result of the pond regrading approved in 1985, the existing easements and boundaries no longer were applicable. Staff approved the permit for the tennis court only upon receipt of the formal application for the vacation of the unnecessary portion of the Conservation and Flowage Easement for the pond area. The setback from the tennis court to the newly proposed pond easement greatly exceeds the 26' minimum requirement. 3.The applicants* surveyor has provided legal descriptions for the portion of the drainage easement to be vacated and for the portion of the drainage easement to remain. Discussion - Please review the Phase I grading plan that was approved in Resolution #1844, in 1985. The regrading resulted in creation of a generally rectangular pond with a uniform slope uphill to a terrace, where the tennis court is now located.. Note that the pre-existing drainage easement had been created in 1982, prior to the regrading of the pond. Since the pond was completed, the drainage easement has never been revised, hence this is an appropriate time to make the adjustment. IWIII nm Zoning Fi November Page 2 of Note property of constr Staff Rec Staf Conservat after the revised t Conservat listrator Harrison, Public Hearing Flowage Easement Approval court. It became iss than 26* from pre-existing pond that as a result ng easements and ’ upon receipt of sssary portion of rea. The setback tasement greatly riptlons for the sr the portion of ved in Resolution of a generally where the tennis created in 1982, I completed, the appropriate time fc : "3 3^ ■V.-? . '-M % ■-€ V I 0 fV-.Vjr VJ: V ; 'V :s:tsv V': Zoning File #1351 November 9, 1988 Page 2 of 2 Note for the record that staff has calculated hardcover on the property and the houses, driveways, tennis court and pool in various phases of construction, all meet the requirements of the hardcover ordinance. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval of vacation of the portion of the existing Conservation and Flowage Easement, finding that subsequent land alterations after the granting of the initial Conservation and Flowage Easement have revised the pond dimensions and eliminated the need for the portion of the Conservation and Flowage Easement proposed to be vacated. CITY OP PROPERTY Site Add Please c (fo Please a on requi A'Ati'Vl- if M « 4# acover on the various phases ordinance. if the existing ind alterations Easement have portion of the mmIP mm ms\ilfei 11 'ij •r-'. t .i m- J #1 . .: . ^s. :WW,r 'f. - "1:’' ’.‘I CITY OF OROHO - 62NERAL LAND USB APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address /^/o Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property_______abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only) torrens? ClJ'i OF CFu^O i, ; n: .* *• r 11 » ' im u t t ! ^itrriTvi- Ui I Please attach legal description to application if not includeS^ on required survey. _ _ _ __«««»«.««- Phone (home) i T *• ?**> ^wv —w vw M rckj applicant Name f * -.1 ♦ ? »«'/ J. w VV Phone (work) City ^----zip -^73^/_7 owner (if different than applicant) Name /f^A. 4 U.Phone (home) f/7Z1.- - ^ . k» w • ’ ; ' . "i ^ t # ^ / l»* W Phone - - - - - - - - - - - -'"]"/ i ■..•■• u Address City Zip I*^do^^°do ’^noO°^8o°own the adjacent parcels of land.______ - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee ^f-^0^.the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $100.00 a) Residential accessory Ose $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) c) Duplex Credit/Bldg Commercial/Industrial Use * Land Alteration $150.00 $250.00 $200.00 d) f) Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain , Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. Grading, seawall, retaining walla within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OWER APPUCAK^^ commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $ 250.0 0 Vacation 7 /$l50^ V-5TT w EaS'iment Vacatio^ ^ . 'EATfelffen't VAdACi^ With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USB OF Present Zo Present US' INSCRIPTION OF : Describe r< •to ray REQUIRED SUBMIT' 1. Completed , 2. Certified this list Center 348* 3. Stamped, 1- on the abo’ Certificat€ Topograph alterationj Constructic Plat Map. As an addej any other f The applicant . remember that yc not been include Certification bj oning Officials APPLICANT'S SIG8 The applicant requested by tJ unusual expenses the informatior knowledge. Applicant's sign OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereb] authorized reaso agents, commis investigation an Owner's signatur Applicant must h Planning Commiss third Monday of review meetings < unable to attend authorized agen^ Office of this c ^/3^/ 4»*'^X 0» torrens? CITY OF CFut^O — - ...«—* • — — • J, . n f. ’ • «: - -*•*-«.*»- • »iT»*^»TVi» W« I included < T-/."A.-V).“''}.vv VW .*»< rry '. i W'i.i • fcn ,nA 1 w‘V • VV' ) :M “ryVA CUit f f t": 4 ^ V » V*v f * J • 7 f • • •• :i :i} A w'WVl V t'WV "?* I CT u Lilj 1 J. 4. w V VW'zrp_j^22/L.r.'i : U _L;A .'L () f<^V>/74 2........... w*u'.- »wv.‘ mrnmmim^nn :r:^if\ / ufU* - 13'VV W. - — - • f' w ‘.' .• J* ; t W •w U ^ t if: I i . . f i / w av'/ X V.’ L* Zip month/year ) land. ^ae L, etc.) dasigilatftd wetland or LOl cu. yd. or more .ning walla within 7S‘ snsultant feei) Oyet^ \/-4 ;«r" ■PS *r' 'r-') mmmmmmirnmmm VKBSWStT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District iijbi i - Present Use of Property 0th DBSCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: _______________ roajno»o ^ajsT-^ FX^Uti^C ’’■yo <rs 2. 3. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. 6. 7. 8. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administratc^r, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature/^Date y Ja^/3 •$$ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. 0)4-^C*Date i i/?^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Wi ■% f.'ti rf' y* h i »•< 4 % • id further nsultantSf rposes of before the lid on the scheduled plicent is :o have an ft Zoning • " •■'/- -Ht-:■' ■' -^ '■:/ ■ :v^ Qgrtified Properties Owners List Zoning File 1927 02-117-23 33 0001 Richard Perkins 14B5 FOX Street Wayzata« MN 55391 B3* OOll Edward Haitun 408 St. Peter Street St. Paul, MN 55102 lnnif~; h^yiV> . uJ.MAlP^ 1420 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 . • • IfO (i/e€»VwA^ (iwtes lOII^S SSViSS, \b-r I .! n ffc: I. r f«p^ rrl fp 5i'i 1) Far Tha Blc sou Sec fro as mon T (^r Dra That Bloc sout Sect from meas raontu Lot ■ . . 'T-f^. # M »Ji •r ’i COFFIN'^rCRONBERC. INC. SUnVIYINO, ENOIN8CRINO AND LAND PLANNING 4«8.A tamarack AVBNUB LONG LAKE, MtNN. 88386 473-4141 LEGAL DESCRIPTION for Jensen Homes, Inc. in Lot 1, Block 1, DRAGONFLY HILL 10-10-88 Fart of Drainage Easement to be Vacated « That part of the most southerly drainage easement on Lot 1, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill, which lies west of a line dra^^m south perpendicular to the North line of Government Lot 1. Section 11, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, from a point on said North line distant 139.00 feet west, as measured along said North line, from the Hennepin County monument at the meander corner on the South line of Government Lot 4, and the North line of Government Lot 1, in said Section 11. Drainage Easement to Remain That part of the most southerly drainage easement on Lot 1, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill, which lies east of a line drawn south perpendicular to the North line of Government Lot 1, Section 11, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, from a point on said North line distant 139.00 feet west, as measured along said North line, from the Hennepin County monument at the meander corner on the South line of Governement Lot 4, and the North line of Government Lot 1, in said Section 11. 4,». •» *'*■ ", ' .V.L=',-Vi;"f Wm .■>v;. ’ ^. r >- ' R.; ■f m -mmm.Jr i>-:, r^.y.) ^ • )unty Brnraent Section II. kmM }:r'^ f 1. •" # lesota, » as 4 fneffient Bction 11.s- # 1^^.'• -1AS - VI * 4.. % • -vS*4v'"' : /, ■( d\ \ City of OrtONO •' !* rl - ’:^» w * «. fi RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1844 » . - * . • * • * • »' ' . t ■ <^ • '« « I' A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER municipal zoning code SECTION 10.03f SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #852 WHEREAS, William Gregory and Stanley Gregory "the applicants") are the owners of the property -K*^ _ . __M-P nv/-k«<-» /Vio'ro<naf'h*:‘r "Citv") and^SJioreli legally aescrii "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the installation of a decorative pond per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #052. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Lalceshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The applicants original conditional use permit application involved both the installation of a decorative pond and the major alteration of a designated wetlands to create a wildlife pond. 4. The applicants have asked to separate the City's ^®/J-®''' the decorative and wildlife ponds in order to expedite the resolution of the decorative pond project requiring less review time and allow the installation of the pond in early fall. The wildlife pond project is more complex requiring additional review time. ' 5. The decorative pond (80'x80*) will be constructed within a ximately 2 to 3 acres. 6. In 1982, the City approved a subdivision of the property that conditioned approval on obtaining a conservation and flowage easement over the 3/4 acre flat retention area* Page 1 of 4 Part of That p< Block south I Sectior from a as meas monuiaer Lot 4, 2) Drainag That Blocl soutl Sect] from monument Lot 4, ai 0m ♦I il# : m .■ ' IPS- ^ m m mm Rwv.: 0:M iclP B-:* *'' r>: »i > m -mm'- v.. - r:- ■■ ~:mBJ-i-:V:'; '• »^r>mmi i-asamim ittai ■:^;'fev.a.v;7> ■.:■ ■■' '-'£??-, ■■4v>tvv;V.y y^-.: ;: -,::■ ^. • "•■ t«->Vv -'X - '' VS M K: » i;iR r.iR •* ft#* -®...- '\ ! ’ ' 4irM) ' t« • [ }i on Lot I, e dra\^m nc Lot 1. ty, Minnesota, et west, epin County of Government said Section 11, on Lot 1, drawn t Lot 1, y, Minnesota, t west, as County f Governement said Section 11. mm - • . .J . • •.m t • I % - )»■ a. « V, VI "th< leg prc Con< per Min: M W'•; 1 lerein^ter ied atQ410 "City")and hereinafter City for a >rative pond il of OronOf i • Residential application ind the major Life pond. *8 review of expedite the less review y fall. The ional review ted within a at functioits led of appro- property that and flowage ■itmi r mm M ySj::-'" •■•V: ,. wm »*” .Jm „4-', v-*‘ • f: ■y.i- .fr. r-4 r;i-'^4 mwr-r'* •fe’'- • I v‘..%iV-;pir•••''. • -< '. ".;. . ».■•■ •• • • "1 ‘ -'X' ’■ •'*! ’ "* K Vi. i.vi City of OROJNO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________ 7. Since 1982, the relocation of an access along the County drainage ditch has modified tn mter- “iftt"ntTetTa^Tn^he e^i%t“iTg v-^ga^on^r^nit-classified as wetland vegetation. 8. The pond will increase the retention of run-off (below 931.5 elevation of about .14 acre feet). 9. The pond will be aerated with a fountain to reduce algae growth an maintain good water quality. 10. The desired water level of the pond will be maintained by an on-site well. 11. The open water area watershed drainsmuch needed sediment trap for the 3 acre, water directly into Lake Minnetonka, overall project. 13. The current proposal for °°/s*Vong ^e™ 'success dMS Sor^ng\%"r dept^f^^^^^^ ’^‘'® “PPer wetland. 14. The City Council has ®°'J®/^®g®of^the Planni*n*g^Commission^ the findings and >^e®®”"®"^®‘^°"L°ippilcan?S and applicants' loSs^ltants^and ;hre??ect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 15. The City ^ounci 1 f inds that granting^ a^ c^^ permit to allow the £gty pr general welfare the detrimental to the health affect light, air nor pose a fire Dublicr would not adversexy . , _ _, _ _ ^-.|.»r»ertieae nor will it 5e;Ucirte ‘’surrotrdrnrpr{peAy valu^ City. page 2 of 4 h 1 "I '■f IIW^■ : :.a •\- '■' '‘i A., MtZlSr^^ U\ ’!f^;:;s^iiii'Sy^^i^y's^^^‘^' n»^‘sr Moya ntf- msi*jf'^ . fo.15 < z Z ^ 2 ^ •V\ . . m • ••• * . ?::v.u ’'/'';* —‘i ■*^- '■••'• “ ' .*• •■ 0 • r-'/. 4T0tf4t-* > • V . — • ' * . ‘ \ \ \ \ OUTLOTB; 4 */' ^ V,. • . • • . - . • ^ • • ##kr« % • •« A «W J»« •# • • <• •A« •••A - i>.r 'jUkiir-'-.- Hl|jmr' ■*1^'- : •/• ^• ; __ jJL - • •• ••• • •. -\ •N,..,, - •• . ••.•■.■ > 7 .'T^.■''I-. ■ .. •«-% •% •■ W?' > >»'^'^1 • • »• v*« .. %r » - . • - ♦ ♦ ^ • * * ' • m ■ •^iys?>.mr.:..; »S^ ': . 'a H 111fe,.. - ■• - - • ^ «• * * • » « ♦ •' «■ * .V r"""^ //'• "X • *%. •^V''.j^|i. 5 K ■■ ;!'/mn ^ 7^’ '^1^'iJl ^-----J ~J7f^ f’.J ti,G . y / / /// > '/ / f /// ^ / •«» —I" • • '2^ V I •‘# I . si •; Plan] Oron< City Fri Jean: Date:Novel 1^: Subject: #135' Varii A r i If the PI the applicant Council makes . Pertinent Ordl: Section 1 Requ; Exis' Exis Prop< Orig. Prop< Section 1 proposed . Requ Exis Prop< Vari. Section 1 Prio Afte •; ,;.Vr ‘ :#■ . .' ■!’<:. . . . Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 16, 1988 Subject: #1350 Lauren & Joyce Born, 1420 Shoreline Drive - Variances - Public Hearing If the Planning Commission chooses to deny application #1349, advise the applicant to request the tabling of the variance application until Council makes a final determination on the proposed lot line rearrangement. Pertinent ordinances - Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore setback regulations. Required * 75* Existing Garage * 16' Existing House * 45* Proposed Addition * 17' Original Variance - 59* or 78.6% Proposed Variance - 58* or 77% Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (3) - Side setback variance required for proposed addition. Required » 30* Existing * 45’ (12* to original division line) Proposed - 24.8* Variance » 5.2* or 17% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance 0-75* setback area. Prior to Subdivision; 0-75' Setback Area • 5,490 s.f. Allowed « C s.f. Existing * 2,563 s.f. or 47% After Subdivision: 0-75' Setback Area " 9,267 s.f. Allowed - 0 s.f. Existing • 2,563 s.f. or 27% Proposed • 1,973 s.f. or 21% rj mu. .1 r-. r'A.-;*1 5"-.' ^4A ■*:"A ^ i . .P - •■t'c^ I .r- N, Zoning FiJ November ] Page 2 of Review of Prio: Afte Plea List o£ E Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi Exhi Exh: Exh: Exh; Review o; The walkway! 26*x38' i proposec side wit: room for bedroom with th' (ordinal places ‘ 929.4 el Zoning File #1350 November 16, 1988 Page 2 of 5 Mview of Hardcover Facts - 75-250' Setback Area Prior to Subdivision; 75-250' Setback Area ■ 2,645 s.f. Allowed » 661 s.f. or 25% Existing ® 958 s.f. or 36% n #1349, advise lication until t rearrangement. itions. After Subdivision: 75-250' Setback Area ■ 3,929 S.f. Allowed - 982.3 s.f. or 25% Existing * 958 s.f. or 24% proposed * 565 s.f. or 14% mmi4 Please review Exhibit D for more detail on hardcover facts. List of Exhibits ice required for Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Property Owners List Plat Map Hardcover Sheet Sketch/Ploor Plan Existing House Skotch/Ploor Plan Proposed Addition (1st Floor) Floor Plan Lakeside Elevation Street Elevation Survey Staff Sketch Locating 75' Setback Line setback area Reeies' of Application i-nnnrete drives, patio, andThe applicants propose the removal oj a »'x78'’':dd ‘i"tion to" th! rorth ’^r^he e^istin; .^e's,„T, a"2-^tvel"dd “ition “to the'llL^il” proliding"aL"itional r rtheMLted living area o„ - bedroom area on the second flo . «,a«.hack 45’ from the 929.4 with the lakeside of (ordinary high water mark) elevation, “ tiln only 17' from the places the northwest corner of the proposed addition only 929.4 elevation. .r?’ ■ : Zoning File 4 November 16, Page 3 of 5 The additior division lii approximate!] is approxima meet the 30' 20'8" would : stall use. At an e* the addition adequate def setback vari at the north' would not b€ their desire imperative t house. The sur to determine proposed add the resident the higher 2 the propose negative coir Mote tl garage to tl the front si Review Exhi The 75-250' increase fo exceed a 4' facts shoul hardcover. : facts. t floor) drivaSf patio, dar to construct a a (29.3*x24.2*). The iraqe at the street iddltional expansion floor and additional lon has been aliped 4S* froe the 929.4 t of the shoreline# n only 17' froe the aMiM ^ - ' . ■•; ■ -if ' "■■'■ . ■• ;r, : Zoning File #1350 November 16# 1988 page 3 of 5 The addition will also require a side setback variance from the new division line from the north. The existing house on the south side is approximately 21' from the south lot line and the existing lakeshore 9»rage is approximately 3.6- from the lot line. If the applicants are “ked to meet the 30' setback at the northeast corner of the proposed addition, 20'8" would not provide adequate width for a garage to function for two Stall use. At an earlier meeting with the applicants, staff asked the Borns if the addition could be moved closer to the street as there appeared to e adequate depth. The City would be more comfortable approving a street setback variance by reducing the severe l“>'®»*‘ore setback proposed at 17 at the northwest corner of the addition. The applicants advised that this would not be a problem for the placement of the garage, but because of tLir desire to expand the living area of the limited first fl^r. it was imperative that they align the addition with the existing lake side of the house. The survey has located the existing house on the south side in order to determine if there would be a visual impact on the lakeshore views. The proposed addition will not encroach any closer into the lakes ^ ° the resident to the south. The Helper property was not ^ the higher 24'+ elevations. The Helpers will receive no visual impact from Se proposed addition on the Born property. The City has received no negative comments from the neighbors notified for this review. Note the applicants' survey does not designate a walkway from the garage to the existing front door steps. The the front steps has an underliner and would be considered as hardcover. Review Exhibit K, note this specific area is out of the 75' setback area The 75-250' setback area proposed at 14% total hardcover increase for the 60 s.f. of crushed landscape area and a exceed a 4' width for a distance of 20' at 80 s.f. The 75- ar facts should be adjusted to include the additional total of 140 s.f. of hardcover. f : Li ■r A) I B) : to m Optio B) ele*^ cons . '1 1*^ :'■MM: ■ fy y ^ , . 'U C*.'•••j h: ^ froift strict with Zoning must obtain Govt Center each of the ress labels required, any changes rate list o£ .on. Please If the above s complete. equired or ees and/or ’tifies that of his/her fiL- n and further consultants» of investiga- ays before the re held on the ill scheduled fi app 1 leant is Its to have an Ldlng a Zoning i I' m -. ■ .1 • 1*'i i| I *V- A h mm .:r,. V: «■ M I a. a s ^ M •MO *” < ssiir K X M M IM Z rnrnm m m m: - ■ Is m1 ft ft n <si See ^ » HI ty > ft i!;!r g£H7-23 ] SHOREL ALPER 1 HALPER lORELINE-8“B.a ^ m> 94>- BSoSsa CM M lU m4 ly Ul P _ 1 XX m*«l M IS UJ •>< S m spir E ly z«-• 8 ^ «i ft C1 '•"is -2:giSSS->ll3 t mm mm§ Vf^-' -.J f;A,i ' S* m • 1 ■ -M=' ^ -- . U-: A. ■■■■■' ■ ■•■. m- W mmm fi: ■-■ji.-"' ' m /*- »^ I ■S- jii:. u aK^ ,ott> m ■■ w na-: * * ; • -w -. • —^ - mm -m • • • t 4 W* . 4 • m gtT0* ■ - •• . M MM <• , f • • ri •■> • ■ • <flSI ' <4 •.*•* • . *’ ’*■ .X-'i**'!!* ' •• . X<‘ •« ^ r'--. j: : '^M • • . ; •• V =• ,- ;i' :.'4*%» :■ 'U: fc:'V •V^ o • .'■ m Miy> r. ^ S - **■-‘ ♦f-- >;*»*■i W:>saas5^ ^ ✓ m m ^ i «M tfl n •- «• ». I 0 0 fl 1 • t M H H M \ r V * 1 • »« 1 > 4 •j-^ • V. m I a a R I I III I ■ I I • • .. ♦ X M « H «M M M M N K Ml IS j w om c Si 01 m It «i C3o ^ 41 « U ^ «T3 ^ 0 Clk C 0 -o g If l4 C >« 0 9 Xt A U :f %K ■ ■' ."Aj \i&:» :v^-] t-;:® r m W ♦ ♦ .N -w ••I %4i «•• ••• At- Am* Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Froaz Dates Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 9, 1988 Subject: #1352 Charles Schoen/Sheldon Jacobs, 2430 & 2640 North Shore Dr Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Application *- Transfer of 1.39 acre parcel from Schoen to Jacobs. Zoning District - RR>1B List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Plat Map With Staff's Notations Topographic Survey With Staff's Notations Survey With Proposed Division Copy of Wetland Air Photo Pertinent Facts !•Schoen owns Lot 1 of Kathleen's French Lake Addition, which contains a major wetland, that separates the dry bulldable land into two distinct areas. 2.Jacobs proposes to purchase the dry land portion that is not contiguous with the Schoen residence. The portion to be transferred to Jacobs is 1.39 acres in area, 98% of which is dry land. 3.This leaves Schoen with approximately 17 acres of contiguous dry buildable including his residence parcel, and increases Jacobs' dry buildable to approximately 14.5 acres. Discussion - This is a logical lot line rearrangement, to place dry land that is contiguous with the Jacobs' property under Jacobs' control. Both properties remain well in excess of the minimum zoning requirements. Staff RecoBBsendation - Staff recommends approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement. \ -U.: : v:ll kv.'. VIV-;-./ SLa. -r:-; V r; ■ ^ 1 'V- i ! fe'';--,-;: bh Shore Dr ring :h contains a two distinct that Is not i transferred itignoos dry I Jacobs* dry land that is trol. Both feents. mm •. .« COT or oJ^- SOBDIVISIOB nagtam wcwiob , j ^#1352 l;, f • ‘ /-.• ^ -r 2 .fm4WN>'T? iU ^ WWA MVA /X*T«w . ^— • - ^A/lO/Cai// AW/ w Site AddrMS____;:^---------yg-f. ^'i—;-------------------; ^ ~ . • ■>' ' (.....■I« >n M - K abstract or _Please check one - Property torrens? m Attach le^al description to application. APPUCOT . Name ‘ frj*i J&Hame ^»one .^., , , - Address ••••^•*••*"■*“*"*"********* _ _. {HOHI0) _ _ _ — Phone omnsR (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) . _ , - , _ _ _ _ City’: ^attach list ii more tnan _ _ _ Zip: B3CZSTZB6 LMB) OSB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size / J.2t- ■m ' •• • X Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet I»and ‘iq Acres Total, all parcels * ■. Residential; no. of —7- -’-/ Other ■ • mm mm. Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites . Existing Units __ _ _ A ^ •Humber o« Building Sites:I m* “ New Units Total Units proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: proposed Use: (check) m Units per __ Acres .« A • « • Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential " Other (specify) 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. FEES MINIMUM MATERIA] 1. Completed i Preliminary Certified ] this list : 348-3271). Stamped, ] names on t obtained w: As an addei any other j Certification k complete. Zoning Official' Payment of Signed cert Title opini Easements, Developers Certification by Zoning Official' Sketch PI Prelimina Prelimina Final Pla ♦(Plus an The applicant requested by tt Planning Commiss further agrees t< Applicant's Signi Owner's Signature Applicant must Planning Commis third Monday o: review meetings unable to atter authorized agen Office of this )r ,• .:wL :. . •. fy . mm mm - r-n; -v^;f t <l(» ?4P,% m ^ ^ ^ee.'i .■'aa« ••:•,'■.} T/i;5 Vw«/W^ %#VVA fWA 1^ ♦ % a V/ aw / w m •« L iToo i2L_ iP « ■• *- • • .JL— . « * • • sitel) IM ibl* Uad m mm . ■:(glillIpWt- \:. /I :• . ..• . ft 1 fi. A- ;,.-V :.-v 3k Em-t’ • v> • ’I PLBTB PRBLIMINART APPLICATION 2. 3. MINUfOM NATBRIAL HBCBSSART FOR C 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. 5. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Flat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$150.00 Xf Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential)300.00 + 20.00/Lot —Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date /^. -/o Date / T — /<^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■m' mm m- m mm. ■ H J ;;- : ' v'3 - /• CITY OF QRONO 1 T In accorda we would 1 license fi require yc ation. You are nc 1.The i your 2.You r that • 3.The ; or- f' the ■ 4 .If Y> acti' 5.You priv 6.Your this First ^ Address gC, _ Date of "1 ^73 Phone I undcrs X Signat aUlLDLNC; A 2C5NINC - 47J-1 ASSESSisn ft: »^- % Bust obtain Govt Canter kach of the ass labels ite list of Licatibn is essmants ) • s complete. 150.00 230.00 300.00 4- 0.00/Lot 150.00* squired or Attorneyt Lcation and ce. -/o -.fJ- before the mid on the scheduled >plicant is to have an q f Zoninf ••TV"^ .^ •u» •• M ■■ •• ..- >■ . u ‘- ! ■ •» m I .n>-<. it. U-" •fe. ■■M 1 ' ' i i V I CITY I1 I■ QRONC^j CITY of ORONO pMt Ofltca Box 66*Cry«t«l Bay, BlianMOte 56323•Munidpal Offiow On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY 1. 2. In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data , we would like to inform you that your request for a perait or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require yort“furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are notified that: The information.you furnish wUl be used to detem your qualification for the permit or license requ. ~;s: “.5 u r /.su.ra-p:“s. the permit or license. If vour requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. you have certian rights under M.S. 15.-165' to review private data on yourself. vour full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. 4. 5. 6. vj" cz/t<=-^A/ First _ Address Middle •=> ofte of birth (aS55~not apply to buildihg/general permits) Phone I understand m^ rigM;s as Mated above. ignature ■UtLOING a ZONING - 471*7357 ASSESSINvG AOMINfSTRATION 4 FINANCE - AtMlJI m FUBLIC WORKS -47MSI4 DESCRIPTION FOR: • / ' 'tm--:--»:v^>v i. SHELDON JACOBS 61185-001 i. Prepared By: SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. —iingln««rs* Surveyor** Plannoro • Soils Toitlng 10550 Wayxoto Boulovord 'i MInnotonho, Mn. 55343 .! Tol. 546-7501 Description Those parts of Lot 1» Block !• KATHLEEN'S FRENCH LAKE* according to the recorded plat thereof and Government Lot 6, Section 9, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly comer of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1467, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 15 minutes 35 seconds West, along an easterly line of said Tract A, a distance of 605.31 feet, to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 57 degrees 46 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 521.40 feet; thence North 14 degrees 50 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 112.04 feet, to a southeasterly line of said Tract A; thence South 61 degrees 07 minutes 32 seconds West, along said southeasterly line, a distance of 471.77 feet to an angle point In the easterly line of said Tract A; thence South 0 degrees 15 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 158.52 feet to the point of beginning. The above descrioed property contains 1.39 acres^ October 7, 1988 Land Surveyor tins 1.39 acres. "" . iheooore D. Keiemna MN Lie. No. 17006 ^ • *.r • 1185-001 M, INC. • • Soilt T#tilna •ward 349 m rtcordtd It 23 MiSt mf Survey 9 of North eld Tnct nd to be Istence of distance uth 61 • a said ance of No. 17QQ6 * m m fl; i i mMi:?iVr q *■ f t ■ -■> // *✓ s ck S fcs CJ •: 1 V;• 'i.a <•>i 0 *1 1 n 0 • I • « v*r*l \ iOlino 9lt*9 \a \ «• 1 :;'-4. 't I, I* ‘ % « li. ift'; i'*:. \> s \. w '• V "i fr =t'i< \ 11 iS ; • »-n l i. .•: \ \ ) •*' C • . J.. . \'• .. •« • J Ata |k> • .» .*» V w ^ I «4i / it-jr *.r «• •i:> » • • ^ ft •- ••1. I a JTnj-fcsr 09 -V,'( 6^. hf v ‘ 8* itmsi''SS^W4'/ V af' ; ; v>; •» *•»«»/ . M ••' • *» . . ,U; .•: '.■•■• ■■ y-V. */' --- v.> r.‘ ' " ; • . r'’ / / ! ■; •' ■ ^ . ^ / ;j| f- ’.'t,'■.•»'•’,>9 I • r •%#:..'. . 4 « •#• ^ • A* "f*** r.i'!X,U WiiMdi *4v ^ •> (.9-- .« > e .. I, •• * •• ♦ »• V_ % •• • • ^ “ t «r c* V• ... • •. I. ' ' jr' «. *. J ..' j / -2 ',. -f *V ■;-;; -I , » « .r .t'^: :M r . i I la *• 5 S ^sSo-sin'*O ^ ^ III ^ <A X QC -d lA •>4 >» 1C < lA _ X 1C \ ►- lA lA O H 03 Al aft M >» ! i.-iso o 3 a < e oi o N•-• -A flft o >» S o X K n $ M X III 5>. in § S2 O «J 0 < PA CA X -I lA »<>- X X < lA ^ X 3 P 3- lA»A U i-t < 01 fti X ^ sIs-Ss 1 “Siii •8“2.a _ ftl eft O O >» »S*-?2S a 8g a o>«Si X O M >• o -J oo <2-. h* «d fy•A 01 or •J PA-4 >- «i a < a».s«£K a 01 eft et >• 1 q ay o Z3 X O S -1 Z C-"ax tfx ax ^i 8 CP O O Va -j ^ ^ gfm 8 S X X %3P N ftl < §ih O z s h-r 8||s siS o3 #■ • S I 8 M Itf Kl ==s*!“ 9O lA H fX « “*“• s* o ly aiS 8 *’“*•*S^^iSiS AgSI5«“*•-• S MJ □ >» SS’S?ssasiXk M m <m O «• 5 W S O U 5 M S h f^ Ifto (n Xi «# M gjj Itf Kl Kl IM 7g 1 “ "2-» g o u mQ< IM X H» 2 * 5 o ^Ml 9 ^ ^ aSuSSS 9 If s Sy IM K« Dt Ml O Ml :si r*» Q .i 3*5“ “S 80S3*2>: 0 Ml z 3 -5o5 u 2 al 88u5 iEi O >> oo tu;i 3«s ^ Ml Ml S8S m » !S8S “55 O Mi M S ^ «-5-3898S«S8S is «— mmmmmM CM O O ttl «s IM Mlas? gi M SiHl.ui'*mui II O Ml si o O IM Urn =^|y*i. sis *s 10 f^ Ml Ml «M 1^ (CM !*• IW« I s ee|i -*‘*SML 1^ C» ^ lA. lit # Mssig U U «• X si >• N I* iipte [ , : 'L ?“• Iss«5 sa* !:§3'’l5•4 Z Ml O ‘ *5^8? O Ml U IM < S.SliiS SS-.3S3 IL.ss gs “ I- 2 a! 3 3 ju ^ IM Ml z Ml Ml X M M M Ml Ml 0 Ik Ik flLvm I CK s~Si O Ml in ^ Mil >* S 3 S Ml Mls:.S5| * ^ « z u u ^ i»« Isailla siiisi -8 o uS O IM MiS CM 1^ U CM Z K X Ik — CK l*N CM a SSI X sa O Ml-s CM«2t: CM X MJ I Ml::sa CM «• 8 O c r.5 ata ll CM !►- I o U -M -« li -M •i* M I X Ml U 288 n s Hi 88:J !33 s£u H 8 t •8 8- ”|i 5 8 ■! "i|II HbHb _ _ H* iH^ jH» Ik -iii <9u u X iM Ilf I ^ w 3PI p-vv ■mrf-^.v, : .'v w ‘A , •.'.•••■^ "i-mv :-5 M ■' ■.......................-:^ p ►'. , - ifm mm i.'- .i r-.-i si s e sS L Ihhii.!|5=8”89i3ftvAh Ikm ^ M□ SB- K mipI *^Si! 'iiSsSssiSsa !l;l i§ H :^‘-*i;- *10 «»sa O HI .^8 Q 8 ?i^2 ^28 >> Ml M 88" HI i i.ii 8<i0oS8«cS&S zL si K 8 «i -I ii«i >•ss HI HI S*m8|^ |lsl III 8 I mm X O HI S HI 8 »88|sg ^.8“‘ 2^ HI y HI X -I «« IH I HI 29HIOXO>»ssissss 8S-»^S3S S 2 HI 8 HI HI _ I HI §s•a • 3S»S asSSSi Mm 5^ 1^ A HI :2. ffS “S'* sis a O Q Oasissa 89 >• N 8 S h '■ ■■• •••• .■•’ •* :? “ V ^ HI O HI ”b!§8 A ^ ^MSa&aa IH _ Z A tfl 8«5i-!I*•*4 H. HI T O HI A iH K -3’-s,a _ M (0 Ik W >a:-.aaa Si Mi SS'^'^ O HI 88*^SS ?i» HI HI A A ssssa, S'*"I A HI 8S |3 S§ 3 S 8 O HI mm A ____HI HI ~ HI HI HI A nSSSSS ss...gi 1 ■’588"2:1*9asxsaa lisi 3 ^3 lO HI hi iH H HI X MaiSar A l-rfS S“'§^3 33{li3 3hl »’V # 41?« r '7 i't i- i> *■ te, -*r t *' r# *4# ‘"f V I t' \ 9mt » i I f' -\yii -•• ,-. IK-1 iRtK" • ■• ■>1■ 1 .'. -i -mMte' ^ ►-•/Vij-;.; IS mmm (•;. v'- W - T^r iim s MEMO PARK MEMORIAL T A L B A ' r fROPOS /J6^ t-y V % i:. ii '■■vM Ik Ek^"' I m im fftbfOS€t> iOirVO Uff 0 f •• •*«• C*^ #ii»* • • 1 1 %SM mM w PP>:--: ;’ ■;: Vi VV-; ' ;n V:-.' K-i Mm fe>:-- f' ^v.i:.:,:, ,V -.. ^ y :y.--- :•• = .-iV ' .. ■ ,si ^••'/^ -k#. r'-.-’i-^ur ;l-i!: c. . -•^ >-#■ , V t ^ e 'W iS.i? ■ I -- f *• i; :■. ■• • liii I -'.‘V^ ii!'' r^s%i^V W«, =<,: V: J*’ 5il:M. :':;d? tv?/;v V . .V m mf^\ % Vs' A4 %*• ■r* - -.?* ^ ■♦ 1 ^ ^ ^’Y / ^V '"Vx ' •■' ,\ ’-^,V ■»•.■'■■ • • \ 1,4‘>i-'^L '"■ 'A'f''•■■' » V * ‘•Ot •: W. m 'm *Qm- i:^/. « y^' '*'■' f-w d 'if# •i^fm^ofry’% ^ : -^1 Ww '■%" t % -lai “'•-4^;'^ t. rff^ KSy^^J»<l5. . F’S: ^ ■‘>r '± %'Mj V • Hi'- A > #n '^2k r To:p: 0] Cd From:M: Date: Subject: #j 2: Si Application Zoning Disti List of Exhd Exhibil Exhibit Exhibit Exhibil Pertinent Fi 1. Each 03 of the propert 2.The re« Merkow furthej 3.Existi rearrar Discussion • This i reasonable i with the pr with the ex; intent to g as of this V proceed witJ surveyor a I would be afi Since • the subdivi: will be the meeting. Staff Becomi Staff subject to dividing lii be vacated. T-' ki ^%\'i ;«rJ; ^r'N' f\ .» iL •A Jk ^ 'Ji' i ^ 'V ^- * -a^iff'?? ,V tS: s«i'- ^'' ■ ar."'V'i • )/■■ £^-^r1d |t - *»'.*? ^->1 >i4«1 , ^1 ‘fv: f -s«^': Jg • ^S'< . I - *- ..1 ."in;:ip fe_-'iv'A-•■■; ‘ • A\ •■• '/: 'm •p^* * • ^ Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Front Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Datet November 9, 1988 Subjectt #1354 Robert & Margaret Merkow/John & Phyliss Charlton, 2340 & 2380 Abingdon Way - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Application - Revise lot line between two properties. Zoning District - RR-IB List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Pertinent Facts - 1. Each existing lot exceeds 2.0 acres in area. The proposed realignment of the lot line will result in a slight increase (.02 acre) in the property at 2360, and an equivalent decrease in the property at 2340. 2.The reasons for the proposed rearrangement include expansion of the Merkow front yard, as well as allowing their driveway to be located further west. Existing and future drainfield sites are not affected by this rearrangement. Discussion - This is a simple lot line rearrangement, and would appear to be reasonable and of benefit to both property owners. Staff finds no problems with the proposed realignment. Note that the new line will not line up with the existing drainage and utility easements. It is the applicants' intent to grant new drainage and utility easements over the new line, and as of this writing, applicants* surveyor notes that it is their intent to proceed with a vacation of the existing drains^e and utility easement. The surveyor also notes that there are apparently no existing utilities that would be affected by this move. Since the issue of easement vacation was not t>rojght up until after the subdivision application was filed and notice ji-jb• ished, the vacation will be the subject of a subsequent application, for review at your next meeting. Staff Recomendation - Staff recommends approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement, subject to granting of new drainage and utility easements over the new dividing line, with the intent that the existing easements will eventually be vacated. r «:'• ■* X-v ■ = ”m II r XT OF ORONO - £ ROPERTT LOCATIOV 2 7 Lte Address roperty Identifi lease check one :tach legal des ■r" # PPUCABT Name kJOH^ Z3- Address: DNNER (if differ* OlH ) Name _ __ Address: _ (attach lii EXISTING LAND US: Number of Ti Development Present Use Present Zon PROPOSAL X ■e Number Propose Minimum Propose ftr - V v:\ •■.■:■■ ; f : \ I ' Ih*’:’- \ - ■■ \; I yW;.. • "f-. I ,t. ^ * EV»r. I I r.- t t-W-u >••••..•. , «>• ^ •» •# f - ./ ^<3 f 4? 9 ifP2 - I"^^;;5Trr • %P54 Hm m Xf '■ ‘ yi ptsr.d^-----J1 Li < \ffT VO <2 55 i 1 ^ ^ • M “^TTJTr ^b- v\ ; - l: ’ 'if U:? ^i mJk !■ i?^^\ 1^SLA- 00 < w a-'L E [V *’ * '' ....*b; ^ / K \: *• • I •• *o ■ • *.n- V ' hJ^ .. —’i. . ;l ;.i. ,,:v ^• • • ^ V/ AS . : ,.» l!. II.. i ift: :■> t’’ . /ii im m aiAi'S si I s M I- 9i I ! is M s* m Y M 01 0) A M M -i < 31 X z ly m§ ly ly M A R M O O O M s ly Si 5 K S SS3 s U z _ ly «J M ss QB{ M 2 at B > u 5 •I JB ^ orLg-i-So ^ H* O aS»| «l «0 ^ • O «ye o at» ly S3 ro a S u '"2 S3MSS lA 2ic§|* 3 S’ls o O u 3 1:1113 m a 2 IJ s 3 111 1 i •• • i 4 t.- X * • • . H ♦* • . *' » • ^ * . «-j .«•. .'^*- « •» TTT ' t > • • » t-jtJ i ^5 i' ^ 1 • 9i -r-Ek /r>- ^ . • . . f . E. • ^§•*-41^ P ■!• ' \. • • # * «<» ; ‘ 7T17W ,w!5 fe-h .. : . • ■• fv»^ >MP I’iis !-3loc»om3 ri;!5*5:1a« “«l «J M 1-^., ^s:|§« S a B M 3 T, -*N ;i»i5 ^ MIM V M S5-.gS“‘ •«. Z «i M ^issi 3 =-« ii^!« l:liiti O M >- rlilii =”il5 -IlliSIS 4P lil Hi *1 ^ m g M ^ 8 M m *aeg O < <4 o H H fX o s.ii HI ^ 1^ s§HEb "I S M < ;;;8i&j»|8 imhmm P || HI U . »l asasixis: *a^a“ «7 fe.--.-: t'.J :x ' ^ &F-". ■•■■■■., .v-:|jj||^>i ;7:.;::: '. ■:'i':.v ■'■••.■■' V:5; m^:'mtt * ■ T05 Plann Orono City Micha Novemb Subject: #135 1410 SI Vacati Application - V that is no Zoning District List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Pertinent Facts During staf apparent t^ the existing on the prop of the pond boundaries i 2.Staff apprc the formal the Conserv from the t€ exceeds the 3.The applies portion of the drainage Discussion ~ Please revi 11844, in 1985. rectangular pond court is now loc Note that t: prior to the re< drainage easemeni to make the adjut Froat liSi'iv Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 9, 1988 Sabjectt #1351 Jensen Homes, Inc./Alfred & Ingrid Harrison, 1410 Shoreline Drive - Vacation of Conservation and Flowage Easement - Public Hearing Application - Vacation of a portion of a Conservation and Flowage Easement that is no longer needed. Zoning District - LR-IA List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Resolution #1844 & Phase I Plan From 1985 Approval Pertinent Facts - During staff review of applicants' proposed tennis court, it became apparent that the tennis court was to be located less than 26' from the existing Conservation and Flowage Easement for a pre-existing pond on the property. However, it was further determined that as a result of the pond regrading approved in 1985, the existing easements and boundaries no longer were applicable. Staff approved the permit for the tennis court only upon receipt of the formal application for the vacation of the unnecessary portion of the Conservation and Flowage Easement for the pond area. The setback from the tennis court to the newly proposed pond easement greatly exceeds the 26' minimum requirement. The applicants' surveyor has provided legal descriptions for the portion of the drainage easement to be vacated and for the portion of the drainage easement to remain. Diicmsslon - Please review the Phase I grading plan that was approved in Resolution #1844, in 1985. The regrading resulted in creation of a generally rectangular pond with a uniform slope uphill to a terrace, where the tennis court is now located. Note that the p/re-existing drainage easement had been created in 1982, prior to the regrading of the pond. Since the pond was completed, the drainage easement has never been revised, hence this is an appropriate time to make the adjustment. ■.A I; ■ > ■x- m mm m)- .-. Zoning File #13: November 9, 1981 Page 2 of 2 Note for property and th« of construction Staff Recommends Staff reco; Conservation an< after the grant revised the pon^ Conservation an< rrison. ic Hearing >wage Easement )roval irt, it became than 26* from -existing pond t as a result sasements and on receipt of iry portion of The setback ment greatly :ions for the bhe portion of in Resolution a generally ere the tennis eated in 19i2# Mipletedf the propriate time Note for the record that staff has calculated hardcover on the property and the houses, driveways, tennis court and pool in various phases of construction, all meet the requirements of the hardcover ordinance. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval of vacation of the portion of the existing Conservation and Flowage Easement, finding that subsequent land alterations after the granting of the initial Conservation and Flowage Easement have revised the pond dimensions and eliminated the need for the portion of the Conservation and Flowage Easement proposed to be vacated. mmm CITY OF ORO PROPERTY LO Site Addres Property Id Please chec (for O Please atta on required JIPPLICANT OWNER (if d •V t. Name Addres Name Addres Date P I (do) fees - COND Renewa After- c mSR AP PLI / rdcover on the 1 various phases ordinance. of the existing and alterations e Easement have I portion of the 'i mSr.- -e wPI t- ■ -r :-" '■Sc/-' Yliftf I II'9:«ki i-.-JXf-y mmme .:•.•?>«■iiilV : : V-’ ■'■-Ji! m: ■h •V * • “ •*•?.«;.:.: I- ■■■';''•■CrH- ..• !’■■ i-•^- ■ • ■ ■ ■•• i.y;-‘vV ■. .■■■■rSOfrimB>. • •- :■■ •»•.' ■■■'■■:■■■ V..’- ^' , : .7'/. t': V CIT^ OF ORONO - GZHERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address /V/a Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) tF X«# j) Please check one - Property_______abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only) torrens? CU: OF CFO^O mm •• • •••••• i, ; nir.I; - i. i. t i U.• a.i?r:n*«u w; / Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- Phone (home) y i^iiTi^______ Phone (work) City ^ 1 u wVte.VWVV M rcki \ 1 LTLm:^ f=’n A/} t - * * V *.' "T ^ T f s^» »* f. »*t **} M « flv f ; f* 1 1 V * W*Vnf •r.w VI OL.^t APPLICANT Name Address f i-Tr»7 »’m ) ^ w‘v/Vi WVVV Tf -7 ' i a UuJ 1i i: vv vv yy^ owner (if different than applicant) Zip i L 7 T,*< *• « ^.‘V L ■-T'-J/ ■ i-‘W Name i - QymmUy Phene fhome) f/y^/7^/-- - -r*/ Phone 7 . f * fim- i\*/ Xw*.‘ L* Address City ^ Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use Institutional (church, school, etc.) Duplex Credit/Bldg Commercial/Industriil Use * Land Alteration $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) $200.00 f) Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading) seawall) retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule cm MPUC&nmS^ Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation. * S$“'5Tnw / Eas«unent Vacati^rj^ EAdAAAAt vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezonlug $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule o\je(^ vV m- ^ i 1 mtmmi PRESET USB OP Present Z Present U DESCRIPTION OF Describe ; yAcvr^ -ro rt 2. REQUIRED SUBMI' 1. Completed Certified this list Center 34l Stamped,, on the abc Certif icai Topograp alteratioi Construct: Plat Map. As an add' any other 3. i 5 • 6. 7. 8. The applicant remember that j not been inclut Certification t Zoning Official APPLICANT'S SIG The applicant requested by t unusual expense the informatic knowledge. Applicant's sig OWNERS SIGNATUR The owner here! authorized reas agents, commi investigation a Owner's signatu \pplicant must Planning Commis third Monday oi review meetings unable to atten autnorized agei Office of this I;':;';;A . ■:firl3^t i fi IB 7 r TTV “r - *WS • WA I i Wf W/\W‘MU* «» .«^/^f»^• • * Ito 4» I i *•i ^.itrritww w* I ^U4» < 7T.- 0 ^ w -* v4» VV V W dod A ^ r \ 1 ’* 7 7 1 '**^ 1?A1 w*V • VV' i 'f »*^ 1 V • w*v ^ - J • ? f '• '*^ •*» -■» Ww'V'A V^'W V r ^pjT ¥i ...r *-•-;• A,^ V vw _ 1^1'P s:S:3^r J7 ti jjr'.ww- •;n»! fc« «.-•-* J ^ -1 1 » . — _ -’-A .-.^Af 7r ’»^ WV'^A . . -* l.W-v -rr. fT.c 1 \// ^ V*.' U Zip r^rj^yy year) ) lated wetland or ;!• yd* or more walls %rithin 75 * int fees! jljl j^jt : .■ :'v T-"..-^‘- t- i N . Tr.‘-:■ i rf*r.1 ' JSs::i^tS5r•:; i^;.v i*i!i PRB8BNT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District iJL i • ®! Present Use of Property Othi Residential ' DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:3f _________________________ 1/^c.x.y^ roizjntD*^ (O^ <^aj S»-*"F40UM4>C ^AS^7^A.^A iT~ Uitm For^!> 3. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the n^unes on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrat<^r, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date y M^/3 •Bi OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Date i applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the ?lanning Commission Meeting. Plc'r»ning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ‘ ia V-:/' : . ■r; ■ ■ 1 iit-S ' : V!t-:C>• ':A ^«i ^ £ 11 • ■ ' iijw) ■1(0 ▼* m 1 f A — I f#' > CO *0 > mi I k Mi- - - - -- iC • *' fm> t-§m.. • ■Bm %\ mL 1 ..V'" ■■ %P pii^l.,•.>. . 1.=.__na in^ter at^410 y ’*r*’and inafter f for a .ve pond f Orono, IIcation he Biajor pond. tview of lite the B review 11. The 1 review tfithin a iinctione >£ appro“ txty that tlowage COFFIIViTGRONBERC, INC. SURVfVINa, CNOINEEniNO AND LAND PLANNING 4Sa.A TAMARACK AVENUE LONC LAKE, MINN. EESSE 473-4141 LEGAL DESCRIPTION for Jensen Homes, Inc. in Lot 1, Block 1, DRAGONFLY HILL 10-10-88 1) Part of Drainage Easement to be Vacated 4 That part of the most southerly drainage easement on Lot 1, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill, which lies west of a line drax^n south perpendicular to the North line of Government Lot 1, Section 11, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, from a point on said North line distant 139.00 feet west, as measured along said North line, from the Hennepin County monument at the meander corner on the South line of Government Lot 4, and the North line of Government Lot 1, in said Section 11. 2) Drainage Easement to Remain That part of the most southerly drainage easement on Lot 1, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill, which lies east of a line drawn south perpendicular to the North line of Government Lot 1, Section 11, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, from a point on said North line distant 139.00 feet west, as measured along said North line, from the Hennepin County momament at the meander corner on the South line of Governement Lot 4, and the North line of Government Lot 1, in said Section 11, f i M - ^ M/NN£ fBROWNS SJrj . ■ 't i ^ • T'« • f M 'X'' ^?:v. •■V.i^ir .s»\ . v-.l § 4 \ ' ■' .C.t^ \[.4r J- ^ ^•v r: -a ^• ;•.■■ ■-ii....wmm mm->vV..-•■■’^iiiN,.-•. •: • ^ i ,. y * ;'• ’».' • I *•' ^ i H.r V/City of OROINO ««. •••St 't. ; • Z\, ». f .,«. * » # j • .* <, •* %.»■ *.. »••• • - > . ■•: Jr■ ■: - v.'^''-'* .V;: i, I ‘ ■ ^ *r * ^ ..-J RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1844_________ A rbsolotion granting A CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT PER municipal zoning CODE SECTION 10.03r SUBDIVISION 19 FILE «852 whereas, William Gregory and Stanley °^=9ory Iherein^ter "the aPPli°a"5®”’ J"*®,. / nl Orono^’^hlreiLf ter -City") _and>S^oreline Dri;^xtnrn^rae_ i?^Sraginflf "property"); and per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #852. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. A. The applicants have asked to separate the ff^te”thl ‘trdir/e ®p^nrpr‘o ‘!iec^t"fs“^^r%“c°oVl^K -g'’uiting" a*/ditIonal Review time. Vn ‘.i.i'5oV h.a .< .pp~- ximately 2 to 3 acres. c Tn iQfl2 the city approved a subdivision of the property cond^aoned appro^L on obtaining a conservation and flowag* easement over the 3/4 acre flat retention area. mi m * -i m y\ - vy .Wm I I- i i - • . . :r-:m 2L-.JP'"*v?> herein^ter ted at^4l0 •City")«nd [hereinafter City for * rorative pond Oil of Orono, Residential : application and the major liife pond. jf*s review of expedite the I less review iy fall. The tional review cted within a hat functions ihed of appro* pro^rty that fcjf-/ ■ 'T' 'v<'S ~:A '•f-. ;• ■.... M- ■ '-^0: - v-s*ep»-r ijgji ■%'fe • < yvU.^'Vfj 'i.r. ••.< 'f V ‘ t _ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1844________ 7. Since 1982, ^he relocation of an acc^^ along the County drainage ditch h - functions as an inter- :iftt"ntTetTa\Tni;e e^i%t“iT, ^^^^ta’tion is not classified as wetland vegetation. 8. The pond will increase the retention of run-off (below 931.5 elevation of about .14 acre feet). 9. The pond will be aerated with a fountain to reduce algse growth an maintain good water quality. 10. The desired water level of the pond will be maintained by an on-site well. “oh netd?d® se"d\mVnt tVap°'fo\^\hl"^^ directly into Lake Minnetonka. 12. The interium p 1 an Pr°^iding *^“®tVl' effects on the decorative pond this fall will nave no o. overall project. 13. The current proposal does proved as of upper wetland,not hinge or depend on the alterar 14. The City Council has ^the Planni*ng"commissio^the findings and recommendations of the Planning safety and welfare of the community. 15. The City council finds that grant^^^^ permit to allow the °2fety or general *^»;e If are of the detrimental to the heslt^^^^^ affect light, air nor pose • “re Dublic# would not adverse y . . , kroner ties* nor will it City. A 4': ■ >,■mm »«Ml« •ler«i fill •i«)«r«i ORONO tlwW( •j :Tijo4: •I«l»•laV» )F THE CITY COUNCIL 1844 AND CONDITIONS he above findings, the Orono City Use Permit to Municipal Zoning to permit the * r^stal lation of a 5wing conditions; and alteration permit by the City the pond, tho City must approve ans for banks and edge of pond, :ulvert and upland slopes within uction of channel to north until teration are apprcved. he use of.chemical agents in the egetation within the decorative rroit the use of fertilizers, in 30 feet from the edge of the iance with any of the terms and LI constitute a violation of the y terminate any authority granted as a misdemeanor. re read, understood and hereby olution and on behalf oJ them- and assigns, hereby agrees to the ill the chain of title of the by Council on this 9th day of fM Wm Butler, Mayor Frahm, Acting Mayor \ y I - - U v ... ij ,0^ i- ■H : '>r. f •( Toj From: Date: Subject: Pertinei Sec List of ExL Exl ExL Exh Exh Exl 11 the Orono City unicipal Zoning stailation of a rmit by the City ty must approve id edge of pond# Id slopes within L to north until :c V2d. Hi agents in the th«B decorative f fertilizers, the edge of the )f the terms and riolation of the uthority granted tood and hereby tiehalf of them- iby agrees to the f title of the his gth day of u1 List of Exhibits Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 15, 1988 #1357 0. Larry Lee - Vacation of Garden Lane, Portions of Highview Lane and an Alley Within Bergquist & Wicklunds Addn to Bergquist & Wicklunds Park Pertinent: Section of the Code - Section 10.12 - Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds. Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Application Property Owners List Legal Description Legal Notice Letter to Affected Property Owners. Plat Map/Right-of-Ways to be Vacated The public information meeting, to be held for all affected property ownars has been scheduled for Tuesday, November 22, 1988, at 7;00 p.m. at the Orono Council Chambers. Review Exhibit E, the letter sent to all affected property owners with the required written legal notice advising that there will be no formal action taken by the Planning Commission on the vacation application until the preliminary subdivision is presented for final action. The property owners were also advised that there would be no new Information submitted at this meeting. Unfortunately, at the time the notice was sent out to property owners, the applicant had not established a date for the informational meeting. m i i ;.y Tj L .i-v Zoning Fi3 November 1 Page 2 of Review of A. Vacati In 1 applicati running a] exchange f Tonka Viev within th€ in the 10 subject to to all nei right-of-w B. Vacati The i expedient Lane woul Review Ex; Lane, if t easement a Vacati The a Lot 94 and road will unimprove City will the north drainage o Staff Reco To tl prelimina: action by deadlines Planning < the Bulls vacation i of drainag Rostads' w< ne. Portions of icXlunds Addn to 3 grounds. iffected property i> at 7;00 p.a. at ;tar sent to all notice advising Comlssion on the is presented for there would be no at the time the not established a f '‘1iiii.li mm • ■ -v i 1'...1 ''' Zoning Pile #1357 November 15r 1988 Page 2 of 2 Review of Vacation Application A. Vacation of 10' Wide Alley In 1987, the City advised Bob Kost, in his lot area variance application (#1195), to proceed with the vacation of the 1C* wide alley running along the north line of the subject property (review Exhibit F) In exchange for his grafting a quit-claim deed of additional right-of-way for Tonka View Lane. The City has no intention of developing a 10' wide alley within the unimproved right-of-way and finding no public use or interest in the 10' dedicated right-of-way, the City would approve the vacation subject to the developer dedicating drainage and utility easements adjacent to all newly created lot lines. The City will also ask for additional right-of-way dedication of all lots adjacent to Tonka View Lane. B. Vacation of Garden Lane The applicant's surveyor has advised that procedurally the most expedient way to vacate the additional 10* of right-of-way within Garden Lane would be to vacate the total roadway and replat with a 50* road. Review Exhibit F, the City would consider the total vacation of Garden Lane, if the Bulls and Rostads agreed to execute a 5' drainage and utility easement along the newly platted road outlot. C. Vacation of Portions of Highview Lane The applicant seeks the total 60* vacation along the north lot line of Lot 94 and the south lot lines of Lots 95 and 96. Once again, the new plat road wilx be replatted at 50*. In exchange for the vacation of the 30* of unimproved platted right-of-way along the north lot line of Lot 60, the City will ask for a 10* drainage and utility easement to be platted along the north line of proposed Lot 4 if there is a future need to improve drainage or install utilities within the area. Staff Recomendation - TO table the vacation application of 0. Larry Lee until the complete preliminary subdivision application is presented for final •. eview and action by the Planning Commission. The applicant will be advised of the deadlines for the submittal of new information for the 1989 schedule of Planning Commission meetings. Prior to that meeting, staff will contact the Bulls and Rostads to determine if they wish to participate in the vacation and as a part of that participation will be asked to dedicate 5* of drainage and utility easements along the Bull's east lot line and the Rostads* west lot line. I-;! :-»i ■Sl ^■r-1 m / CITT OF OROHO PH0FBRT7 LOCA Site Address Property Iden Please check (for Con Please attacl on required i APPI.ZC2UIT Name _ Address (if dil Name /> Address Date Prc I (do) i tees - CONDI* Renewal After-tl APPLIC fc’-ite i rn . '. .:•>.75T7A.- 22- site Address PH(Sh<>^i 4 Please check one - Property ------ (for Conditional Use Applications only) ____ torrena? Please attach legal description to application if not included ^ ^r,sao on required survey. _______________________KII^£lj £lI£L --------------------------------------------------- , 7Z.Q200000 APPX>ZCAjaT Maine Address Phone (home) Phone (work) City ______ OMUER (if different than applicant) /T. /AAA.f Phone (home) 01 GEii "?r» Of; nucrv Tf 00 m •eaMSBAMSip * in/'? 7* XV/ 1 / .Phone Address liiO /iA/TvgAsiT7 fr^e.ci.i.Y fjJkoLJM Zip . , (month/year) g^Tlof ■g^^otf Ss^tm the ______ yggg — COMDITXOHAL USS PEPH^'fS * ^ p» $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use ^15^,00 b) institutxonal (church, school, etc.) $150 e00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) - Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 fJ Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or Grading*and filling - 101 cu. yd. ®f Gradingf seawall# retaining walls withi of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule a APPLICATIOMS $150.00 “n?- $250.00 —- $150.00 ---------- $ 50.00 ■■ $250.00 ~ $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (•► consultant fees) Vacation ^2“ent vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals w w ^ m ^ other - sea fee schedule {A. ..4 m V ■fj :'' imvi Kiii||a^ •! >' PRBSBHT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning Distrlc Present Use of Propert DBSCRIPTIOH OP REQUEST Describe request in de 2. 3, required submittals 1. Completed Application Certified Property C this list from Hennep Center 348-3271) St2unped# legal sized on the above list witJ Certificate of survey. Topographic survey alterations involve ci Construction plan# if Plat Map. As an addendum to thi any other persons you The applicant and Properl remember that your applicat .lot been included. Certification by Zoning Dep Zoning Officials Signature APPLICAHT'S SIGHATURK The applicant hereby agr requested by the Zoning i unusual expenses incurred 1 the information supplied knowledge. Applicant's signature OflMBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowlec luthorized reasonable enti agents# commieaion memb investigation and verifi^t /Owner's signatui^.^ —————T*—-------. Applicant must have all sul Planning Commission Meetinc third Monday of each month review meetings of the Plan unable to attend a schedul authorized agent attend ir Office of this change prior * • -m*' 4PUr^ en«7 ^ - -.•... ........ • ^ tld#i r/^- 1 7 “,*'?.>.*( A A.1 ■iJw^VfcVWVV Ol iitM ri.fc/v#w *^urrv‘ Tt VV ssc£i?T-mtiK you ]iV27/ U/D ZLo S.<IO<^ i/year ) c.r gisatad watland or ca. T«. or ■ora g mils within 75* tmt faas) iM m:-k j u V*- 'M' m& ^ : .-ik "•1 vl tv (ii ^;:.*-.y-. • ■’’;■*« v« v;■tiiiTiafit:"': *- ■ ■ ■..i. ':' H. . t ^ ••PRBSBNT USB OF PROPBRTY Prosent Zoning District Present Use of Property _ _ Residential Other (specify) /iA^y DBSCRIPTIOM OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:■^Ac^ri^A ) L*An REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Stuped?^legal^^ sized envelopos (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. . .^ ^ Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. ^ ^ 1 • ^ rAs an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list or any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ^ _________ MR MB MB BM MB MM MB %BB MM MM MM MM BBB <^M MM MM MB *M ^M MB ^M mr Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ __ _ _ _i,:iT Mi mm mm mm mm mm mm ^m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mam mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm mm m» ^m mm ^m ^m mm mm mm ^m mm APPLICAOT'S SIGEATURE ^ ^ . . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to^ pey all fees^ and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied.is true and correct to the best of his/her Knowledge. Applicant’s signatttse Date OmiBRS SIGNATURE ^ ^ - 4.1.The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and zurtner luthorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members^ and Council members for purposes of Investigation and verification of this request. Owner's sicmature^ * Date m^mmmmmmmr- mammmmmm^mmmmmmmmmm^rnm^mamm^^mmmmmmi Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meotiiln^s of th© Planning Coininission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 6 Zoning M Office of this change prior to the meeting. J :!=;:•■;' ■-Tv ,,.* .—.•! '.''M Sc :/- ■' ■■ - : r2 Ma • tus§ i E S N M N •Io s SI le •J o I o ui fO *1 ssl;fi » «I'l; eVMtl e o i U !lM•« m o m O' M Oo Ki yj 7S.U I K S3 S e o s :*§ V Sl> 5> ::S-II •s> «i II ^. -mi mi 90 K mi O P >- Ma•» •» S 2 * ♦M K 2 UJ « 5 B »:»- m K If) 10 If) w £ X win 5*l8«g“‘ pf ■ : ■ -' '''; ■,y;. - r'-^: ' K i' •nv -V.-" V ■ ■ ■ 1 ;■ :m \-VV:-« -JV ms, r ex- irdens , icent :h of a ;he jm . it f €’ a:.;>* ^S'-' ,i;\= z'i ■1?^%-iM \M *v- t Hvr ' :'^-: • “■•'S'SIf "Hfe* '.’M ■f: CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, November 21, 1988 at 8:30 P.M. on the matter of #1357 0. Larry Lee*s application for the vacation of dedicated road rights-of-way and an alley legally described as follows: 1. The alley in Bergquist 6 Wicklunds Addition to Bergqulst & Wicklunds Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part lying west of the northernly extension of the east line of Lot 6 of said plat. 2. That part of Garden Lane, lying within Tonkaview Gardens, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying north of the easterly extension of the south line of Lot 90, said Tonkaview Gardens, except that part abutting Lot 63 of said plat, and, the east 5' of that part of said Garden Lane, adjacent to Heathercroft, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying north of a line dra%m westerly from the southwest corner of said Heathercroft and said line being at a right angle to the west line thereof. 3. That part of Highview Lane, Tonkaview Gardens, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the northerly extension of the east line of Lot 60 of said plat. All persons wishing to be heard will be appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City offices for feview, by appointment City of Orono By: Planning Commission JeaWne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator To published the week of November 7 & 14, 1988. I? ic m i,' m'k- CITY OF ORONO TO: All The enclo: before th proposed the bound Larry Lee have beer subdivisi' vacation proposed informatj The Plan applicat: presentee and subd: Planning meeting. Please c< questions further < 0. Larry )uncll Chambers s30 P.M. on the n of dedicated 0 Bergquist & lat part lying Lot 6 of said rdens, Hennepin >n of the south :t abutting Lot i Garden Laner ^ing north of a ^athercroft and 3f. nnepin County# le east line of time* Written by offices for V 'XV- ‘i.;■Li' wm m. j ti Rvm.. IP"'' t:' mH H CITY■ j^jja .ORONO CITY«fORONO Post Office Bok 66.Cry.tol Bay. Minn-oto 56323.Municipal Office On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 9, 1988 1 Affected Property Owners ^ rtf a scheduled Public Hearing3sed Hearing Notice advises of a scneau^^ he Planning Commission on N located withinvacation of roade and an^a-ley^x^ ^ daries of the |L ^vacation application should a (Application #1348). of the preliminary in filed at the time ||,u’icipal ordinances, a ion application. the City if the plat, asapplication must be filed witn ^\iXl be no new d, is to “PP^°yfiHearinrfor the vacation. :ion presented at the action' on the vacation nning Commission Yj“„.rv'^iubdivision application is tion until the . Jhooed that both the vacation Bd for final action. “ J®, „gcheduled before the “coiiission fir“Mn«l action at their January 16, 1989 contact Jeanne Mabusth * ^V”vou\nve any “quHtlons" on \he preUminary subdivision application of ' Lee • % -y 1C a By TOi Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Froils Michael P. Gaffronr Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator ITate:November 17, 1988 Subject s #1358 Tim Johnson/Ted Feig, 627-629 North Perndale Road Renewal of Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Application - Revise lot line between two properties to reflect actual use pattern. This application was approved in 1987 but was never filed. The current review is essentially a procedural matter» since City code requires that if the subdivision approval expiresr the approval process must be started over. Zoning District - RR-IB Zdnt of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Resolution §2222, Approved 7/27/87 Exhibit P - Council Minutes of 7/27/87 Discussl Applicants originally proposed to revise the lot line between their two properties. This was approved by the Council in 1987 and was not a controversial application. Both properties remain at the two acre lot area standard. In conjunction with the lot line rearrangement, the applicants were granted a vacation of the old drainage easements along the interior lot line in exchange for new easements either side of the new lot line. The easement vacation resolution was similarly approved July 21, 1987 and does not have an expiration date, hence does not need to be renewed. Note that the previous approval expiration was possibly a ®is-communlcation between applicants and staff. The documents that applicants were supposed to execute and return to the City were never returned. They claimed they never received them. Our application file contains only copies of the packet sent to each applicant, not the originals, hence we do not know for sure what happened. Staff la iidatioa - Staff recommends approval of the renewal of the metes and bounds lot line rterrangement for Tim Johnson and Ted Feig at 627-629 North Ferndale Road, finding that both properties will benefit from the proposed lot line reasfangement• 4.’-TV <4^.- I ■ :'* . . ' r 4 OffME EOS FROPO ■ f mmm J. .3 m.TTrWKH Adminittratof Ferndale load - anganent -* tias to reflact actual in 1987 but was never rocedural matter, since ipproval expires, the lot line between their in 1987 and was not a t the two acre lot area t, the applicants were I long the interior lot the new lot line. The July 27, 1987 and does be renewed. :lcn was possibly a The documents that o the City were never Oui application file h applleant« not the ed» i« metes and bounds lot e27<^429 north Ferndale 1 the proposed lot line ■ KdCS CITY OF OROHO - SI PROPERTY I.OCATIOH • I :T I YVISlOH APPLICATIOH TJT c / *• -T-v .rC » • • I»IJw M. ; t Site Address /^oerTf - • ^ . w w -1. « U S-‘ ' VV '» Proparty Identification Number (P.I.D.) 'iO~US> -Z.% II (^O'L'^ (^C.Z'lV' ' .'fee ^ ’ r - 1 • 1.' Please check one * Property abstract or co^Y torrens? : 7-^. r r ■ V . A* • TtH . .. fe 4- ^ I I ' f »v U Attach legal description to application. “TTrOCeTCT- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPItlCMIT Phone (home) Name G , h€lG> ~ ‘ *ti» .At ; r fe 4. » J ^ .rf VV ^ ^ V .. / • W ■•V' Vfe-'. <77 5 -~’f7V Phone (work) Address; L- 'Z^ X.City; b-^ Z.Zip: TT39/ ONRBR (if different than applicant) Name b 7 Phone (home) —JlCT? _ _ Phone (work) :e than one) Zip; EXISTING XAND USB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size ^ n.c ^ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)(Msi Qthe esidential; no. of units ^(specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning District _ _ _ _ _ _ PROP(MAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites Subdivision for New Building Sites 2,Numb«r Qf Buildin? Siteai .X Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use; (check) Units per i Acres _ Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land! ^Jlesidentiai __ Other—4specify) •.•V. . f • -• l-f > I WF mi ffiiiSBS^'1 4 I- .i NINIM < IT* tM 5. Certi compl< Zonin' Ir 41 I 7l Certi Zonin The i reque Plana furth i; • #’ !ltm I <• « •- • w «1 •. ’ , ^ M W *i." * w •» ^ . *A.AAA/^ — •‘V'V •.' «*r A • t* ^ ■ «»4 ^ _ cedi..'" ....“CV I f WW.* m •» m• * ^ ♦ w r» I ♦ i , *A 1 *t A * # \f « VV A ; ^ W « W i- -^?7^ ii/ ' ’I- • • « '.* »-. • P!\■/ Ji05> Pi SS-3 9/ Ls It* 2- lnf •itte ) icrmm p»r--* ^ 4 iiim V m % - . >:-.f ■;i?. I V• : T .* *11' •>' • ■ "• A*i; • •..."' 2. 3. MIHimni MATERIAL MBCBSSARY FOR COMPLECT PRBLIMIHARY APPLICATIOM 1. Completed Application Form ifF£Fl?>6°0"3 Toft tlllir StamiVdV ‘legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed *ach of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). ^ ,4.4. «4sAs an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any ether persons you wish notified of this application. 4. 5. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is iplete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. i;Sf jrr?;/^^^s?if r io;!:;%r ?o“r^r ’ • Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. P0V0Xopers Agreement and Letter of Credit. certification by Zoning Department that Pinal Plat Application is complete, zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _■_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II * III) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-res y /25^^ $150.00 250.00 300.00 + 20.00/Lot m-Pinal Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* ^ 14-«*»*. -..at-aHv aarees to provide all information required or hv the zonina Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney,reouested bv the Zoning Administrator, ^xry r.ngxne«t, M2S^ing Co^«ion and Luncil nec^sary to process thi»_fPP^ and .-n .0 n fur^er agr^to pay all additional^ees established by ordinance. Ag^lcai^ s s^^f^ture /J / jA ^c.hJX(r><^ St' 7.^.Owner's Signature ( ^-1 Date V Al J c\ Date x: Aoolicant must hav. all^lSiittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are *'*^^he<Tuled third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at review meeting, of the Planning Coi^ission and Counci 1^ If an app 1 leant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please BWke »”*"5f»f"ts to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 9 Office of this change prior to the meeting. wm W-' H*n •.:-V SATIOM ' (you must obtain A-603 Govt Cantor sd to each of the le address labels separate list of ion. St Application is ate ________ ter asses al plat. tents). ation is complete, ate -- $150.00 250.00 300.00 ♦ 20.00/Lot 150.00* ition required or c. City Attorney, is application and ordinance. y // I y I / 5 days before the \ are held on the St all scheduled r an applicant is OMnts to have an luildinq i loning os Kl Ma. • IIISi Hs Ui QC £ ^ t:o e ui Q Z S cy Z MJ 1^ I tt z 5 «o Ui o 3 M U. cO O ss;CK rn UI UI iO •J < a aI'iKl IT) «i «J O UI UJ _ y) M N 9 O < < m o X z s =tt s UI ‘^a in 3 o s*ss »4 UI UI mJ ^ to SS M Um Q Ifl5 UI UJ UI X -I <-1 X £ A lA flO O lA O i >» V UI >»< < id g •n n id <Mos CM I lO drti wvt I o UI •ai*Ss M M «Sl X Z > O UI H I- aI mo S ^ S 3k z ^ ^ Si S M 32 5 >• N 4T lldf Kp • 1 * «• 1.) Hi -X^ -1 ■•/n o X O o O tx < H Ul (d r •H UI mJ ±O UJ•-« a a UI oa 5 «i z a •j <a Kl UI UI tt•-« a a a a _ •« a Z I id Kl UI <0 o to o o o So M Ma a omm £ 3 UI id UI < o Z Q ScsSuiS «d o UJ to a m o Id Id id o SS •J < a S M a M «J §1 to Q t4 Zaa <«« a ««i< I a «9 •I ^ < to p VA a a « «A Ui M cx «i4 ««i *u ^ z >- “* 5a o«• a z O > < UI o a id c^. UI UI o to p-« o to fsj I . “? a to a a UI a a < UI^ ailr, ^->*8 «9 3 UI O S id to S" a U) a z 3S5-. < < O to Q ri; •> M 2 t- I a UI «• CO a a a a = s- O' a o fO Jl Ml I o o a a to >K •<z z id u u O H4o* a a tx a a - 9 UI 3 it a>d 3 W o < ao Z a I a <o “S«4t1 O M N. 9 -/ iJ N X o a M a M a Z Z < 5 < to Q z z >• >- a a Oa cu z I a a CO a •o a 1 a oi a ro < UI 9 ^ I O Q Id a a to UI < < aaa Oz o s h* U U O M ao a a UI 3 ?:g id z o a o a M a to 5ja z I a O Ma ^ to a UI a UI <a CO a g C a 2M a Z S U4^S •o a I U KT^ < S lA z z S rsi a a H. a a UI ^ o a a >• o o to I <0 Is «to Ci > M a to o HI UI M a CMoo to CM I CO I *d to s oo to a I CO Is CO lO a o to rj I CO s i QC O 5a a to sS_ Z a UI H < a M a < SSSza £ -I a — — ^ ^ a a Z < > > Ki a a UI M K o ^ UI UI rn 6 a to a UI < UI Q 3 3a aU U a § a a ^ S a a UI oa a g a aa a 'aa a < <t a CL oa ao a to ^ UI t UI 9 3 2 S 3 S z g UI 8a a a a ^ < h* S 3 5 a q Z a <1 1 >- \ ft < a ft ^ ^ 33 1 0 M a vi ^ N M O O oa UI Q ^ M a Max - _^ S a to to p «i 2 ^M z a a UII a z ^ -I CO UJ o •14 a UI o Qi isif i:§ a H. CNJ id _O M CSi O H t- id / ■ SB CM a a O 3 i< < o a M M oa •o (VI ( X a X crt a < < 4C o Ei o £ui a Z a o iiia UI y y a Z ZS *" UIzu UIa a a a 91 < to 9 UI Z UIaaa x£ :d99 o o a ato o a a id Z ^ -3 M g- sl K N I 88^ M S 9 ly I dc r ^ -i ss ^ O S ui;s 1^ ^ 5- u. Q SbSkI o O M M g |0| O H H ^ M 88 23 ttl «« «€ 2® 18 Q m <-« X III M ft 1^ m ft2r2»,f •it m m ^m III ft iZ aizm / «. B C g 4l»» *w -i*' '2 ft ft Wl ft ft p ^ ft ft ft ftllft ft ft ft ft < •i* ^ Q yi i4 taiTZ ^ ft n « ft ^ ft ft ft r'Sfi; «gy ^ 8! 9 «ki {*•si::£3 ih\ ,i« Z *>' Xi 0 ► y^" < ■. ^ h •■' '■ ’■■ , 'A: j^<w: ft X ee o ft tt 0I ft |j “*S ft ft gS8HQ Mri 93 ft ft ft -I < X = “-S,S*» > .1 <ft ft ft hi ft ft -I ft hii ft ft oft «• qe 111^ _ o < <ft o o 0 ft 3 ' 'j v» i. ■^ '®: V,’: PIi ft ftM ft >• h* «M « 3a“3*S ft X ft >- ft o 0 ft ft m o Q Q 3 s 9L ft fsi 4 tm I 8 i >'ft ft §ft 2 as 3 ftw 9 ^ JF ^ -- / .' tm 8* 88 ^ Ul ft Qft z ft s •it U. ^ O X tt ft O ft ft ft Ul III h- X ft III Ul I s, 2 = S2 SsoS -I UJ X ft § ^8 N(8 O h% >» •it ft X X ft 3 o*o* 88 88 M U 8*5Ul Ul ft •1 -J 23 2|8l>S3 Ui u P9 1 ®CO Ul o< lu ^ X ft O ft ft ft ft t dlb ^ Mb ^ ft Ul Hft m sft ft ft ft h“ •"3 go O H ft >• ft ^ ft 3 8* 88 s ^ Ul ft Q Vs ft Ul ft u. > •Ml «*8 ft ft M Ul I ¥>s S3 h B"* ft ft Soft tu®^:s^ lU ft ft ^ ft 33- s|.§Q X Ul ft hm£02- 0 M Oo O' im 8H ^ X h- O Ulo o ft UJ ft ft ft ft •J g ft ft Ul Ul X ft ft Q ft M «•CO o ft ft ft ft ft O o o ft X O X M o O Q ft * “ 0 ft Ul >• mm ^ ^ ft Q CM S C S 5a ft ggoft ft a Ul 40 I s:u.•U c HI ^ S o S X ft ft®-sc£ Ul ku ft iftjf Ul ft 3 I 8 I 2 19X ul ft >• N^w ^ ^ '-0 » » “ MM»o »- m / 5 H X"»S -^- H- I City econom a subd subdlv the Ci purpos City o line X the Ce 1985 a condit 1 o a w 2 1 3 S c 'll Mi ;;>T4ft4p.:%:;•••■i ;• • --v:■Vi- ; :■• •,<- City Of ORONO OTY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2232_________ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A metes and bounds SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR TED Q. FEIG AND TIMOTHY D. JOHNSON FILE NO. 1150 WHEREAS# the City of Orono is a municipal corporation Cir^anized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS# the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly# economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS# the City Council has considered the application^for a subdivision by Ted Q. Feig jmd Timothy D. Johnson (hereinafter the subdividers") of properties legally described as follows: Lots 1 and 2# Block 1# Laurent Addition# Hennepin County# Minnesota (hereinafter "the property )# and WHEREAS# the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City for metes and bounds subdivision for division and combination purposes. NOW# THEREFORE# BE IT RESOLVED# that the City Ccncil of the Citv of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement for Ted Q. Feig and Timothy D. Johnson shown on the Certificate of Survey by Egan Field and Nowak# Inc. dated October 2nd# 1985 and attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1. upon approval of this subdivision by the City Council of Orono# the owner of Parcel A as described in the Certificate of Survey referenced above must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel B as described in that same survey. 2. Likewise# the owner of Parcel C shall apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel D. 3. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate pf survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's office on or before January 27, 1988 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. Page 1 of 2 U 4A «-e Ui mJ g z 2evi 2 uj u J.“35«bt232 M u. a C I/I ••c lu a J M K ox: <FI g tsi S I CE >» > CO LU Ui a mJ mi I u a III ^ -1 09 O < FI O n Moo 5a s FI i O I jS Ui z >o c ? m • ? . . -4 •i - CIL pal corpoiffttion Minnesota; and rono (hereinafter for the orderly, ; and le application for (hereinafter "the OWS: nnepin y"), and requirenonts of >n and combination ity Concil of the ivlsion of a lot \nson as shown on nc. dated October 2nd, t>ject to the following Council of Orono, the of Survey referenced ion for tax purposes ,y to the City for 9. ed Certificate af Lth the Hennepin n, 1988 together on. &. 5 A IM ■.y* f m iii 'V -v i. • lAls| HI M S2 i M Is S8 I 1- , • •. - 'Srt.,■4: a «e Xuser Zoo a O tt ui "S2SCM d*. I tt CO U •*4 UU O ^ tt I/) ly in 5a I r. 0. .J -i < §a Z r lu iu LJ ^9 inS o z z -g Ki 2 o o Q O fiC •w til UI m mi 9^< in <ss Jo S •w Urn Q m5 mm UI>- > u. Ui UI Z •J -J 8J:€2 *5 “*“*^S V 0 ^ >» V p >> p 0 < o UI Ch •-^2 2; = § is: X 2 S ^ o S z! a ;;; ui 5 ^ ■ ’ *A U #-* Jj § e z ^< tf) o o _ O QC UI Z n !j § < Ui ? < < O 53S*"* I 2 in •• CO UJ ^ U. UI Ui UI ^ -j m < in e UI I a a ^ a c: in < < ^ z z M9 u u CO O M M Ki o a z a UIu. oz o in o S vO o N 2 oo o o a mi UI Of tt «w UI mI «C ^ Q I Sm UI « u» u •i D -I »n UJ ^ -1 UI M M I «i < Q O ^ O O m COino o 2 -.-.82 UI UJ z < Hr r: m q ? oo o in N i 2 » w |3 9 “ stt 5 ys»sieS?- •ft I J- I Z is 0m UI O M < m Q Csl z I z CO UI 0m u. M Q ^ UJ O Z UJ < Oz < SS <5 > < Q otn Lnin I 'O K9 in *UI «d «J z UIu. >5 Hin in in^o o 3 o «>e O m CM I CO I •8 tSi a “SUI m -I in ____< in it z S ^ 2 z Z UI z a s«8 z in o < CO z z a. O s o o o z -.2 < wO •w Ui < CM I«2 U» UI C _ Op z z •-<5-1 o < O UJ M ^ ^ ^ U> ►— mm •• 3 I ^in S oo yj UI Z ^ gg? = 2 ^ ^ 9 G u m 3 ►-» Qt Z Z Ml 3 is.iO Z UI "'C X 9 M Z wl ^ z M X o o o z •-4 UI oz m CM I p 9 z UIu. Z Z UJ c> < < «j mz Z < in >-5gin I om o o z -9 UI _^ so c ^ 2 < < z oZ X zu u in o M M -4 z z ^ X 29o z •-4 UI *-• .J < o ZZ K1 UI in «i in < Q I u K «l po S 22 UJ. 5u. O' •<ssg in UI aX n* z O CM CMf I CO 8 IMr s Ui in I >5| St C3< fi' > UI S sO M Ki a 1*^ ui §-29 |i|i£ .J l» CMo m CM IP I*o#n COm oo m CM I I COin CO C9 K» M I P I ? O ^ Z KIin UI in mm n -> UI 3§ H < >- -I < ^ iSi 9 —“ = |gUIu. H »5UI UI > > UI Ui •— ►- cn in 0.5 Ss UI KI mi in< ina U U Ub“5 z 22ia 8 ^^P:8 UI UJ a z < < z z 8 ^ UI KI m4 un -< UIa -4 33 35 UI UI a ^ 3 z z -i .J ZQ lA 8;ss -t a _ UI 8?a ro z a* 9 ■saa ^ Z XCM O 001 ® o •w UI mm mmi CO < KI g «• CM Z I Z Z P Ui O *4 z in 5*sm o ^Z Z KI in UI in•J ^ i KI K* “I CM P P to o KI O H 00^ >.qE2 X Ui ^ z Q Z N O M CM Z H P O > cn in CM O Q O Z •e UI <KI p CM i: I z P UJ U» UI UI < < M M &9 «n < ^p u QZ as < KI Q ^ I p p p 8 m fSJ 9S P P X UJ P P M M U 93 a z z U. Mb Z P z UI u. x2 ►- Mt p >* »zo5*3lUi mm mm ^ z 5 ^ <l>i^ mi -^ 0 8* 1 5 ,1 ! m:-41 r 1 J--SI- M. _ y. icii mi 11. I M • III Z s UIm s •^X O C3o z ! ^ UI KI CM mI I 2-9, f > p " p p -> ) p P c p o P O P I CMZo SS •M UI SS8 f ie UI P UJ <-J •w u» o 7 2 [8 M at I!!.. S e at P P[ CMmm ^;4. ’mm mm ^./y.K% ki;CM |K* lUJ S a UI I P § UJ O H ■< Xu a It -sSSf •f a4 W a M Ml «i ^ M M Mi «9 «i •» «; M Ml «i Q| 1^1 iswgSa<# 9 9 IKI 3SSS*^i s!> js*a;: :S#aJiafe''• * ^::: \ .-?•‘.•••V .‘;.v . -:■ -.. .’i, f , ••' . •'-'■ ,i ' ■ .: :•“' ; ■ ■miSj!&;5';j N P 5 ^ |53 JT ,-*• / . s*§5*o oO tt > - o o o a O -4 Ul «*oj ^ Ul u g“?;2 3 < ^ << < H cn Ul Ul Z «u Ul HI g M 59^S < CO UJ O _ tt S M uu ^ ^ UI S M S 5 u. _ J> S 9o H HI N -) ly Z <mm mJ Si l/> 0 O N >- SSxxS3 HI Z oe o o ot *t Ui HI Q <VI SI s § Z IM 9 3S HI lA lA =s§ I ^ *aS «i 3Sh 2!3 r 4 "Sto U4 lyk> Ul 40 Ul < S i t4 Z os 23 ^ 9 to ui 10 Z^% jitui -o Ul «a S o to to GC > liZ?pn s o to p- 5 Ul .35 ^ IM K ly < >- Msesto Ul 3 is ili•I 0 o m4 O i CD g .1 < P Z H o Ul ® o —a m ^ s sSS? it Ul ^ ^ < HI M« «j mI .y Q Ul < Ul UJ ^ Ul HI Q M M ttM 2 z r Ul I Qt < ^ CO 2 o o ^ 2^ u. ^ x r M QrO H Ul Z Z 2 5; CO o 9 < CO < 90 O o O Ul z gsss CO z u u -to 01 o s^ Ul >• !^ fi 90 •M ^ -i .4 Ul «t o: tt Ul Ul 90 Q ^ -4M 2 r z < 0 M «• •• S Z ifc _ _ B C— c r uj 1 u> < *S S3 Ul «l o 90 o yj W 9 Z X 3u o ia tt U4 <4 M X 2 “ X«4 z .1 )\ UlUl H M H < H Z to tt ^58! Ul Ul o QC CL a < CL E r-» to ^ E§| Ul M < • tt H CL IL >» H Ul gu» z z z M Ul ^ K to Ul I i :ri,l ."A i :M/iT-:-! mm i-:/ -m ■>■ j^'V'..-'. .:;•- •';■ r-'- ,. ■. ' ■••<-r- L?Mw j| . . ■••••r RY-. \-',- .■r-L ;^- --A mm fc.;7 ■'■''■■■ • • 1i'fv : Y-i •'• ■> ^ O:.- - VV^ V W- ■ 'A'.' ••-• i. •• K- . , :.Y*J:.. - : :• .•'v- ‘^1'"'n vY : 0's . ; '4|f' r ^ -Y •■:■■■■m - ,' ■Y-:-".':.?'/A-^' j^:';- :- ‘ft ■ . --V. ;-: .A-';j.-) :;y y-..m,:m City of ORONO CITY OF QRQNO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2232------------- The approval granted by this Resoluti^^ exp^ event, it subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 27th dayfpf July# 1987. ATTlST *\*L' Wr^hy^ Hallin, City cleik Grab^# Mayor V ■’ .»n. page 2 of 2 SI y ;i ■»; ■j-il rM: H -'■a r?: > -A hm organij "City ( econom: a subd: subdiv: the Cii purpos*: City o: line r the Ce 1985 a] condit: expire if the that event, it y of Orono for Ml n ’ , this 27th i ■.Jf ) J ^ ' M: .'iSi'-'Ti r i£U fc‘' •• s '..J :w • \ '.'.I 1: «r;fe=m. JF If .td^ 'SK*;; i J', .fit I mm-.*>« 'i\V CKTV OF QRONQ City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2232_ _ _ _ _ _ A RBSOLOTIOH APPKOVIIIG A MBTBS AHD BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINB RBARRANGEMENT FOR TED Q. FBIG AMD TIMOTHY D. JOHNSON FILE NO. 1150 NHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter ”City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Ted Q. Feig and Timothy D. Johnson (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Laurent Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"), and NHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City for metes and bounds subdivision for division and combination purposes. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Concil of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement for Ted Q. Feig and Timothy D. Johnson as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Egan Field and Nowak, Inc. dated October 2nd, 1985 and attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of this subdivision by the City Council of Orono, the owner of Parcel A as described in the Certificate of Survey referenced above must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel B as described in that same survey. 2. Likewise, the owner of Parcel C shall apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel D. 3. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's office on or before January 27, 1988 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. Page 1 of 2 -'■■m p7m fr .. .. 5?: *: re;- - 7 : : V-. 5 H V /ri" r mm MIN *1148 ST. #1150/111 629 SUBDIVISI DRAINAGE RESOLUTIO #1153 RIC 1295 SIXY VARIANCE FINAL RES #1155/ill 3955 NSBE VARIANCES RESOUmC Vf-:'fe- 'ii' tv ) JOT.Y 27, 1987 led by Counci Iweinber 12231 approving a f care/pre-achoo1 a ipiacopal Church. ffron explained the ne rearrangement to I two properties to itenance patterns. rainage and utility exchange for similar itten, seconded by lion #2232 approving 3n of a Lot Line on #2233 approving icated Drainage and Ji Ferndale Road for I. Motion, Ayes 5, Sime, seconded by Final Approval of t 10# 1987 Council lotion. Ayes 5# Mays lime# eeconded by plications #1155 and Council meeting per 3, Mays 0. ■ Ai .f* ^ r L m :Aaiit'ir' Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson ProMi Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dates Subject t November 14# 1988 #1337 Robert Paige# 3493 Crystal Place - Variance - Second Revie►tV Application - Request for setback variances to oonstruct detached garage. Zoning District - LR-IC List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E - Revised Proposal and Staff Scale Sketch - Letter's From Applicant and Neighboring Property Owner - Notice of Planning Commission Action 10/6/88 - Planning Commission Minutes 10/3/88 - Memo & Exhibits of 9/29/88 Discussion * At the Planning Commission's October 3rd meeting, the applicant was advised to consider a revised garage location and submit a new proposal. The applicant has reviewed his situation# and is now proposing a new garage location. The revised proposal merely replaces the existing garage with a larger garage. The new garage will be no closer to the side street (Navarre Avenue) than the existing garage. The proposed garage will be 5' from the south side lot line# requiring a variance# but is still approximately 1.7' further from the lot line than the existing garage. The 1' proposed overhang will leave the drip line within applicant's property. The neighboring affected property owner, Lupe Gomez# has submitted a letter of non-objection to the proposal. Variances needed to accomplish the current project are as follows: 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - Garage located nearer street lot line than the principal building. the 2.Section 10.25# Subdivision 6 (B) Minimum side yard setback: 10' Proposed: 5' 3. Section 10.03# Subdivision 13 less than the required 30' setback. - Garage doors facing street are i A >:W ..V A Zoning Novemb€ Page 2 Al placed someth not re setbac width ' nature Gd garage since i leave h Staff 1 St followi %; ‘•y."' '.A ■ ■'’' •' sittrator detached garage. Property Oiroer 6/88 the applicant wai t a new proposal, osing a new garage rage with a larger street CNavarre 11 be S' from the ipprcximately 1.7* The 1* proposed >rty. r ha a eerbaiitted a re as folloifss seated nearer the facing street are IP ■W- ■ ; In'rt. .. • -i*mS:r■ - f'rr. V..m-ij. . .ii :u\ Zoning Pile #1387 November 14, 1988 Page 2 of 2 Applicant states in his letter of request that the garage will be placed at least 30* from his west lot line. Although his sketch shows something different, if he meets that 30' setback, the third variance is not required. Applicant suggests that the hardships for the 5* side setback variance are due to the location of the existing driveway, the width of the proposed new garage, and his wish to maintain the circular nature of the driveway past the northwest corner of the new garage. Given the location of the existing house, the variance to allow the garage to be nearer Navarre Avenue than the existing house is reasonable, since moving the garage behind the extended west line of the house would leave him with more driveway hardcover and very little back yard. Staff Recn—n nd stion - Staff recommends approval of the i^evised proposal subject to the following conditions: 1. New garage shall be located at least 30* from the west lot line of the property. 2. New garage shall be located at least S' from the south aids lot line of the property. 1. \h:. .iv, 1 1 I 1 I 1 f I —I ) 4. "'A ') 9 0 ^r4m firs- yyfC x»r s^ftm .-i- :-, ■; '4' 'iwr^i M CRYSTAL -rm,^ ;-:,.«4.- • ■■i) wr"^r i,*- ■ ■ ■-i: " u fleiwr Jf ‘ u3 Z UJ LJ OC OC $ <z /f' "ib"' Ciirti’*/ triit tMi: is a :r-jo inj correct -eirr^is-!: it i :t: :* y vq/ cf the *s of Lots ^ ond 10, Block i, liavarre Heights, anj all evistiny buildings, 4*.d •d location of a proposed garag* thereon. It dees net purpert :o show an/ '“dvfrents cr encroachment:. : . ■ 7=s^ fS/OAi ¥t/ :* '.fii 0 lftO» l«7 ;:v •■... r •»♦, • \-;*- Oct. 26, 1980 Robert Paige 3493 Crystal Place Wayzata, MN 55391 Mr. Mike Gaffron; City of Orono Attmr talking to you on the phone Wed. Oct. 12. 1988 I «■ P’"g.^® " *After laiKing ^.o y«« «• K ^ ^ long, although the exactnew garage approximately 20 feet wide by 3u e „?ii be the same s.'s.5'4!«i" £;;»«•; -tr •• »• one. Hy existing garage 1$ 3.3 feet fro» "V g2J^”2t‘l1ne*and*w?*1*S approved. Thank You Sincerely r^.’. *rt Paige #• V ’ ••*. •• r ..'.• •••.V- -: -4 a '1 CRYSTAL uz>z UJ § Jjj cc (TI Z 7r' c 2 r t: ' / t n i : t *s of Lots y an •d location zf '•jyf'-eris O'* e - I to build i the exact 1 be tho saoe •are Ave. to se. The oeu rUnce which t will enable rection of the he existing m garage If I will be . L. Goeez, ey lance Is e 7^ PLACE CF *4i€VVS/OAj ve/W ':h5certify thi: this ts 2 :ruo .jnj correc: '9cr?:»?*: st: :r; .• , s of Lots y and 10, Block i, liavarre rte.jhts, ana ail e-.isMu^ builaings, ana d location of a proposed garag? thereon. it does net puroert :o show any rovenents or encroach.-nent:. ?y/s/OAj aa. j ■C: 1^, tt'V 5 ^ \ tv » c^rj. i!l5»"/0*: tS 3k % p. • • •z # •W vfy 3 Miy HutliJtnss.• t p •• s in/ iWi;/:-. -i, CITY OF O P.O. Box Crystal E TOs Robe 3493 Way 2 TYPB OP M DATS OF M Planning Tab] MOTES ANI Plar variances applicat location Pie. options. Tuesday, Commissi November prepare I App additions October J In 1 requeste applicat: If ! minutes, approval V: Hf :i::i^t 'v :';v!i:.-m ZONING FILE NO. 1337 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 10/6/88 Robert Paige 3493 Crystal Place Wayzata# MN 55391 COPIES TOs TYPE OF APPLICATION* Variance DATE OF TING:10/3/88 VOTE* 6 For 0 Against Planning Conlssion reconaends the followings Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS* application was tabled to allow applicant to consider a revised garage location and submit a new proposal. Please contact Mike Gaffron et 473-7357 if you wish to discuss your options. A revised site plan proposal should be submitted Tuesday, October 11, 4:30 p.m., for inclusion on the October Placing Commission agenda. The next following Planning November 21st, hence if you wish to start construction this fall, try to prepare for the October 17th meeting. October 11th or November 14th for the November 21st meeting. In all cases# the application must be continued with the ^ requested information within 90 days or the City will consider the application as formally withdravm. approval by the Planning Commission. a: H '..T r 'V MINDTl ZONING ] were in The* and the 11 Commissi Ayes*6 # #1337 R< r 3493 CR1 ' VARIANG PUBLIC Th< (avly-no Th« As explain of Crya setbacli yard. 1 Crystal Chairma house. Crysta] conside to whet behind street. Ch were p: There w been re not rec stated 30* set stated propose Kelley revisec $150.0( any add to wher P] garage he cou excava that h 1337 m Acnon lotlce: 10/6/88 lend approval Of . Review of the ^ revised garage to discuss your »d no later than er 17th Planning •ion tteeting is Ills fall, try to upon receipt of sting is 4I30 p.a» ig. the subnittal of LI consider the nning CosMission ifter review and WfiV. ■ mm 1i ym ili '%] iA:--'. : pn M. Be A : * " ^ ' M 1; JHp;,, ■Slii F4 m COMHISSION MEBTING OCTOBER 3, 1988 SER CONTIHl- nly one structure on the lot. Ther. were no coriments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. ja Ke» rhairman Kelley, seconded by Planning It was application #1336. Motion,Commission member Johnson, to raoxe vv Ayes-6, Ways«0, Motion passed. #1337 ROBERT PAIGE /' 3493 CRYSTAL PLACE ^ . yiyi^ , ”®“T‘keStv\t o/fubUc^ul^and Certificate of Mailing were ''"^dtrly-notedi; The applicant was present for this matter. Assistant Planning explained that the property in 1"fstion was seeking a of Crystal Place and ga«|e in his frlnt setback variance to construct ^ y Vrom thl stleet lot line of yard. The garage would be -treet lot line of Navarre Avenue. Crystal Place 5\he designation of the front of the Chairman Kelley asked about ^ the applicant was usinghouse. Gaffron abated that because the app =cin^“i^dVr/a^ts: r?o^\“t:i ^hln^the e^\"sting“ froAr Une of the house parallel to the side Street. Chairman Kelley •a'^'^^tether ^ "VpiJlIlifn! were present to express their p ^ correspondence had There were none. Kelley asked . Gaffron stated he had been received from “c^Sttoring properties.^ neighbors. Mr. Paige not received any comments from M ^ ___„_ing such a plan if stated that he felt n^^^^ that fact. He stated that had he known that, he wouia chairman proposal. Mr. Paige atated that he w« tack with a Kelley asked Mr. Pal9» if.t.d that^ho could not afford another revised plan. **'. Paige state not be necessary to pay L“°addiln;al"?e«? Mr! PaYg” sUd he would like some advice as M wSere a feasible location for the garage would be. Planning commission member Hanaonsu^^^^^ garage in the ^ ?hat location because of the he could not ^%i^^nning^Commission member Brown stated •trarSe'SJd^^tnit wh%^%”^'he^e°-uld be a need for a great MINUTES ZONING PI amount of Planning stated tl: the avera stated t property, corner of Ther and the p It by Planni Motion, A #1338 DOA 3235 CRTS VARIANCES PUBLIC HI The duly not€ The Ass: explaine accessory the rear through i along th< Schibilli garages. July, 19 The prop Chairman be. Mrs. of the ga require i 22*. Gal putting I the larg< below. Mr. that thei in need c standpoi: could be retain th parking a of wheth Commissi) id natter Lanning Motion# Lag were iffron corner king a front Line of Wenue* of the using aid be tion as ocated tie side s who tion. e had e had Paige an if . Be ach a irnan ith a mother o pay Lee as :ho nev d that of the stated great MIKUTBS of the PIANNIMG COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 3, 1958 70HTNG FILE #1337-PAIGE CONTINUED ' , , .of excavation to place the garage in ° Id garage strtod «>at anything that projects toward Crystal Place, l>ey°"d the average front yard setback, will not be approved. Mr. Paige Btlted tLt he did not want to remove any trees from his property? Hanson reiterated his opinion that the southwest corner of the property was the best location for the garage. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Motionp Ayes*6, Nays^Op Motion passed. #1338 DUANE 8 CONNIE SCHIBILLA 3235 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC BEARimG 8s52 P.M - 9?05 P.M. wavaThe Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing wer duly noted. The applicants were present for this matter Assistant Planning and Zoning Administ^rator Gaffron explained that the applicants were hardcov^^ accessory structure area variances to construct a new garage t*hA rear of their property. Access to the garage would through a driveway that serves approximately 8 ®rierht“"Of—way. The proposed location of the Schibilln garag* would conform to the locations of «riVes? The Schibillas had a garage that July! 1987 "Super Storm". The old structure The oroposed garage would have two stories of 624 s.f. «ach. Chairman Kellly asked «hat the “«=tual site of the 9«“tL''size M<ra Schibilla replied it would be 24 by 2t • ir rne tv the garage were reduced to 500 s.f. P« “by require a variance, the total area would be 20 22'. Gaffron asked the applicants about the ..esibili-y or putting a half basement under the "*'.^°**the large size of the upper fioor and cut down the floor area below. Mr. John Nelson, the contractor for the ?were ¥hmi- <-heir house only has half a basement, so the applicants were in Led of storage s^^ Gaffron added that from a hardcover standpoint, there was not really any could*L removed. The applicant was Jfretain the gravel parking area. Mr. Schibilla replied that the MrkiSg aref was nit really needed. It would just be « n# whether his ouests parked on grass or gravel. Commission membe!: asked if there was any alternative parking f - ip 1: m: i Si •;/ M ir... ■rv ty ►jv m TO: Frexs Date: Sobjec Appli( i Zoning List o E E E E E E E Fertin 1. S a 1 f 2.S m 3.s< l98S age site. Hanson I, beyond Ir. Paige from his outhwest age. Ls matter seconded on #1337. ling were Gaffron ver and irage to ould be I and is n of the ghboring d in the removed, f. each. |e would the size ould not »r 22* by Lity of Llow for 3or area stated ts were ‘dcover tr that nded to tiat the uestion tanning l^arking ■■■•■ .A ; *’ 'ti Jit,**- If m§t % m l«! H I Esr*'fcv fcA:'r~/k^ -V m rnmmmwmi m iji Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson rv-'" 'f V L a Pn Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:September 29, 1988 Subject: #1337 Robert Paige, 3493 Crystal Place - Variance - Public Hearing Application Request for setback variances to construct detached garage in front yard. Zoning District - LR-IC, Single Family, 1/2 Acre, Sewered Diet of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey With Applicant's Sketch With Driveway Exhibit E - Applicant's Letter of Request and' Hardship Statement Exhibit P - Hardcover Calculations by Staff Exhibit G - Survey With Normally Allowed Setbacks Pertinent Code Sections ~ 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - No detached garage or other accessory building shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot except on lots which have frontage on a lake.• • 2.Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Minimum front yard setback-30*, minimum side yard setback adjacent to street~15*. 3. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 * Yards and open spaces. A) Reduction prohibited. No yard or other open space shall be reduced in area or dimensions so as to make such yard or other open space less than the minimum required by the zoning chapter and if the existing yard or other open space as existing is less than the minlrnum required, it shall not be further reduced. mm ! .1 Zoning F Septembe Page 2 o PertInez 1. Th: coi be lo^ a ( 2. 4. S. Thi lo ex ga ga tr pr th St si H€ wc I 3! p: C< a* g I t H a t s P d o ninistrator ^ 3 uct detached garage id Lveway ihip Statement d garage or other front or street lot : on lots which have t yard setback^3o*. :es. >pen space shall be such yard or other the zoning chapter as existing is less rther reduced. . :-ti ■ »:iTw ,■ afr •V ‘‘'M ii.l'S MM mm m t V; -'i ■ Vr Vv V* 1 :A-mm m i J:vv- Zoning File #1337 September 29, 1988 Page 2 of 4 Pertinent Pacts - ^o«ehruct a detached garage near the 1. The applic*"*^ propo® "9 place. The garage is proposed to corner of Navarre Avenue an . -„,j igi from the Navarre Avenue rt'iinr fi:arrrfirT.^^^^^^^^ i1etach;d garage could legally be allowed on this property. 2. 3. 4. S. The applicant has an ®='i®ti"g nc« exptnses\n lot. Applicant is suggesting h® ^^3 sidewalks, a flower excavating and ^^^^ning wall in order to place the new garden, dog kennel, a a. ai«o claims the location of major garage in that location. Applicant f, _3„ge of the size trees existing on the property, an located anywhere other proposed would result in removal of trees if located than the proposed site. 4. 4-h*t the applicant consider attaching a garage, staff did suggest that the appiic setback variances. since he could P*^®*****]^^ ““^^ached garage would be prohibitive and He notes that the cost of an attached gar g would reduce his lawn area near the house. j 4>via *^00—1 000* hardcover zone where Note that this vrov^rty is a hardcover review of the 35% hardcover is allowed. oaraae is not removed in property, finding that if ^ ^ hardcover will be right conjunction with new appears to be more driveway gravel on this lot than is normally needed for adequat . ..K- .„„Hcanfs request, note that there are no houses In considering the pp • this is railroad right-of-way.to the north of Crystal Place since this is rai 1^^^^ However, also note that reviewed by staff is along all of Crystal Place f no fences or that section 10.03, subdivision \6 shall be rer:rtrertro^h:t^^^"^^:ff^v:!s^ intersecting streets, then other curb line, diagnally 30* from the point of beginning on the other thence to the point of beginning. ^ m •v.r ft;.:-: - 4 u Mm .1 ■m' .1 ■# lir" Zoning Septemb Page 3 Ex Na ob a ' Ci th PI ea ap pr- Discuss Gi approve unless In a a hardshi] structu: would b high CO certain amenitii area wi: Fii the app hardshi located would b4 [arage near the • is proposed to Kavarre Avenue im showing where >erty. outh end of the ual expenses in walks, a flower place the new ►cation of major age of the sire anywhere other aching a garage, etback variances, e prohibitive and jver zone where • review of the lot removed in : will be right sore driveway ► service. e are no houses I right-of-way. in front yards red by staff i» no fences or lots shall be riangular area b lines of t%»o line, thence :her curb line. It.:-;'. V - k' I 7:] m h- Zoning File #1337 September 29, 1988 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit G notes the location of curb lines for Crystal Place and Navarre Avenue and the triangular space that is allowed no obstructions. It appears that the proposed garage would not not cause a visibility problem for this intersection. 6.City records do not indicate whether the sewer connection was made on the sewer stub on Lot 9 at Crystal Place or on Lot 10 at Crystal Place. Applicant should verify that the sewer connection used the easterly stub, since if the westerly stub was used, the garage would appear to be over that private sewer line, making future repairs problematic. Discussion - Given the tenor of contemporary zoning codes for the LR-lC district, approval of a garage in the proposed location would be quite unusual, unless this was a lakeshore lot, in which case it would be quite normal. In a case such as this. Planning Commission must carefully weigh the hardships noted by the applicant against the potential visual effect such a structure will have on the character of the surrounding neighborhood. It would be unusual for the Planning Commission to consider the "extremely high costs of site grading" as a legitimate hardship, although applicant certainly may feel thai: the grading and potential need to remove existing amenities is not reasonable. Also, Planning Commission must consider whether placement of a garage in the proposed location would decrease the light, air, and open space in the neighborhood. Certainly what now appears to be a leurge park-like lawn area will be visually affected by a garage structure. It is not clear to staff whether applicant definitely proposes to remove the existing garage if the proposed garage is constructed. If that garage is removed, does that help justify the new proposed garage location? Finally, please consider whether the statements of hardship shown by the applicant are hardships created by the property owner rather than hardships inherent with the property. Consider whether a new garage located say 5* from the south lot line in place of the existing garage, would be more appropriate. It - '4 t’- '.V. .i -3 Zoning File September Page 4 of 4 Staff Recoai If the reasons for Planning C< staff's opi findings oi precedent. ■■'ll 'K: X-j[i-A. tal ^lace and s allowed no I not not cause on was made on 1C at Crystal ction used the e garage would future repairs Jl-IC distrlctt |uite unusual, quite normal, lly weigh the L effect such a Lghborhood. It the "extremely ^ugh applicant :emove existing int of a garage open space in park-like lawn ly proposes to icted. If that Lxage locatio!i7 ’dship shown by ir rather than a new garage isting garage. :: rv ::4 ■^4 - . ■ -i 'li Ji’’- tl ;k V'V--.m .aJl-X >Si ► rV;.t ^ Zoning File #1337 September 29, 1988 Page 4 of 4 Staff nm datiofi - If th. Planning Conmission feels that applicant's Planning Commission ^ croLsal without specific and unique precedent. "H’ »4- 4 4 S’ ■f. i.Li : 4 -, •>' ift. f t:. • CITY OF OROl Initial AppI ($50.00 p< Renewal Var: (no chang< After-the-Fi PROPERTY D • -a • Site Addresi Property Id< • . . s ♦ Please checl Attach lega required su; APPLICAHT Name j/ Address OWNER (if 'd: Name _ Address Date P] I (do) PRESENT USE Preseni Present DESCRIPTION Descrik VARIANCES R] 1 SetbacI' Other .fm ted hardships and 9uld request that d hardships. lA cific and unique tting an unusual Ksa » :i- •■ mi i» r'\ mm '• «Bk^* |> .■K " ,.V|*’-^!^-• '. ■- y.v ..Llt'-'S • CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 • ($50.00 per each additional varian Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application After-the-Pact Fees (Double application fee) •1 /.I •T rDr-in Ji - * : nccrrct «ivr!itu.» wt t iuu 7 *'*;*! Vt'VVi/V} i w'WVifc V'VVW r^i m*' .Vva cult .— f; u 4 \ •• \.l /UUI — fu ** rrA**/!iniT/t I wu* PROPERTY LOCATION > : ....:r." ". . ;:.:r:r . .. site Address y /JJ^7/fT/P Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) • . . ••■ •.».. •••• Please check one - Property ^ abstract or _ _ A c V « V'-‘ i « • aZ ^/ • V *. o,n; *5*--vIWX t V f •. wVC/ .' torrens? Attach “legal description to''application if not included on required survey. A<«r * « APPLICANT Name ~/^S£ff Oi^gS Phone (home) ^5^^ _ _ Phone (work)^^?**?;?^/ >{; Address OWNER (if 'different than applicant) City I //Jg^n/f-r4 zipt iS‘S’39/ Phone (home) __ _ _ _ _ _ Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do)*fdb hot) also own "the adjacent parcels *of land.*•• m »• • # PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District . . . Present Use of Property ^/N(LL^ DcO/yC / /z -/^ Residential Other .(specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST ' Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost $ _ :SirrJ.S^se-r * • VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front • * *_____ Hardcover ' ' Side Rear) m mm 4» ' • « Other y-:, Si:Mmmmm. m P"T’ n 7; hardship Descr enfor DESCRIPTIG Descr Code REQUIRED S 1, Compl 2 5. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Certi this 348-3 Stami name: obtai Certi Topog in e> Plat As ar any c Addit The Appli remember informatic Certificat Zoning Off APPLICANT* The appli requested unusual e: the infor knowledge. ^plicant* OWNERS SIC The owner authorizes agents# Cc tion and 1 Owner's Si Applicant Planning < third Mon review me< unable to authorizec Office of .nccrrcI 4^i vr::tw^ w.* t , -r,- “ V/ /u’-n A i iTn: VU> CUit <»♦ ... t m* • • ■ » •• • t tf 4 V • VV *rA ,''„• Xw W' • Vv ■■» •» X 4? X j'4:Vnnf^ luv I ?:a; r.-.Twivwr. v wvv 4 IV/ • «* f «» M» ' i'm>vy.* ^ •«« on • lUii « }Z<-3Se/ sxr /E 2ip» „2ip: nth/year) 4m .-•••(«» Rasidantial «t $ • .o» <« « laarl -Si- ■<i. M- ■|-;- .-A V ;k ^t- : -u-;? .L.: M ■>? <■.' 0^*T •ii L ! ■f ;-T-^ HARDSHIP I' , ^ ’Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP DNOSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- required submittals 1. Completed Application Form . Certified' Property Owners .List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list ffbm Hennepin XOlinty Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^ ^ A.UStamped* legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified .of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE • The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certif^s the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Applicant's Signature ONNBRS SIGNATUREThe owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and furthef authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultantsr agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verifiestioiy^f this request. ^ ^ . (ji^l n...Owner*B Signature _ _ _-!!!.- Applicant must have all aubmittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on tno third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled ]^0view meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an appll unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to ave an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. </■ ,' 20<> jA,t\ ''e.y/,/..// '■ >w/'-///^»^'yw// \/ /uv_*:; / f •< \ -N<' >• I, / Ji 4:TM Kt T n « '■ ____^______1. — ^ T :L NGSTON k?®.* rPTSWirr ' «l?VI • 1 It '*12 11 •»f/ . i 11* 1 A 14< le^jtiT Ui: »*'' I*./- 27 / r—1 l.h) S 4 2 1 s« r’ l» .| 20,23 24 nf^ferr? /,8 6 kS 19 Mm'iwmi 5. '^r' [fi\ i ‘ r il f* 8 1-yn / f\ ’J# ^ f i i Ir ■r* i« » "r . ‘' 20 ► _ 21 ’ Uv>) 1 . » ■ ' 22 . 23 (u') 24' m ,*iprr i’ iS V .V'. 27 2^, / % tHCSAH NO-- -15 —-PLAT ,-’68) •l» % JV* 1^ '-.. 'I- »■ . Ok, Mol« WILEt'S NAVAt^Ht ADO to* wQCattSM «i part at 0<*»* A*« & ♦)’>• cf«aticn 9 lot 24 «* 8Al37li**c ,Al234 & C*Mif\t)/ S-rvtjol p» »»*• r i -A vi ■vm JRX;. .# c -i ra r mA-''“iH'WrWBilllTft yl^’O 1% $»^kMit MW Ni 0MrnmM rt if Oi>** Mst 14 iM« eitl5T«tB ,rt * ,..|Uj^ V ^■X. .> •• ■j■’V..'• Mi' 0 ®g! 8 S 5^9* S < III «• m ^ ^M M 1^ in #1 ::6S|:>i 51 “S5 •• >• _ ly a'” |aS 2«3 01 OBIM UJ3 ioIM m-is! IS V^ OK I-* ZM U Ml IM in c ■• M M ' 9 9 P( 5k»S? m K IM >• 51 isss “s»s«a_ ♦ H* ui r*. >■ flSuBlfii m K IM o Ml in M «j I >• «• = 8s S-.|:sas.sas «l < IM h* OL Ml m K- «j ui«a m 3 «i !:8^§n •I.*, CM M §n A2;*“is2 «J ^ ^ M E I US lU M ^ W M CM ^ ^ O ^ »n H IM g o Z -M s«i:g2 I «M OB < fM IM U H m IM g CM h- S Ml < oSS&;S)SS H A CM O ss; ii=-, Z *055 ^ Ml IM ^ ^ < ^ < Ml N CM ci Z ^ CO CM O CM < ^ O O O CM 3 (saUf^ r3"*SS» T !3^Sz r« c^ s ^sisssasisat < O- mi- ^MMd g z MlfiSSSKl X M M ►-r5sas = -^ftSS5 ^•’;*v. ■ &; !C IM O ^ m ^ -i CM m is K u u Ml _ “2 cn Ci MlKl SS =131! j ® *g 3 S ;i=iii n 9^as r 3 -• Kl Kl Ml Kl CMI .-sr-a§**s£•J A 5^9i mm fM* Kl MCM «J z m >• ID CM 3! CM <in o o o CM z Si>- N Ilii i i «ii Kl Kl >- CM Q I ^ Z a“SMl s^ss£§gi =i!iCM Ml M I K* CM >- ICM: CM S:i^ X I ^4 m ; r r.ij ■* ■' ■ ■:-V.- A r-t M :rystal :<■- . 'V . >«V llJz>z UJ < UJoca: St <z ■fy that th Lots n ano tat I on ‘■ants 0 of a r ani s I mm a «-fi a 8 a M a ih\ mm-x liS -•....i. V;- : -‘riteS :: ai ..;. .^iSSafeifewK^WP <?».• mn 'F?YSTAL i;.: ' . -V tu ZUJ § LlJ CCo; < > <z f-t'. ' •wr/ 1 -;t /S /^OT"SC/{Z^€^ 7 ■/c .-V 1----------- / /•J >,V PLACE J oc? /V^ /-, ^ *■ I I I I !fy tfiat tnii Is a true and connect represent i tie f' /(ffu ■^' 5 5 vV % \ I /'-'ks ♦ / p, • • • tots 9 and 10. Block 2.. <» ^ t - vey 0 4 ^ne "W! Navarre Heidhts, and ail eii-;-!-- huiirti-.-,, :atlon of a proposed garage thereon. It does n-* - jr-'r-’ o ei? ; '‘•nts or encroachments. ^jr-.r. ,o she., an/ § • ^ s « «• iiit*1^—' •■ • ■'*iiiThrtiilt*Tro «ji 4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION I. description of request A variance application *?hrsa«c°roof pitch and^3 inch steel Sarige. This building -S^^SSe UndscSpe tiabers and 5iM?Stlirr“o5rwin bo?5rr'’ihS B.r.8e on'three (3) sides, Mtchlng the decor of the house. II. HARDSHIP AND DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS The sole purpose of ''*'"’*2nt.'L*froiii^bu11d1ng'*et thet^locetlon be-SluS rSrSniriS- "3r?«t “fr; »-thJot^l1n.. .H^^ur.-.rgreen^^^ trees prevent ae froa huildino to the west and north. The garage driveway that prevents aooroxiaately 3 feet above a flowers,s K-; »'-v s-Si s:,r The proposed Pl«ce»ent for the new 30 J[“^h%^5e^Sf^thrgSMgi ’(bSSk side) would be 5 feet pu„. The west side of the gsfsf. the bituelnous *“tJ*®* ^iJoi the north-south lot line end would be The northwest corner of Lot S*1t'*doernot obstruct°the view ?:« rhet;55e!“n5eJs'‘nrexc*a:.??orind does not require cleering trees. Robert 3. Paige 3493 Crystal Place Wayzata HN 95391 Residence 471-9329 Work 939-3381 - ext 136 lU QC CCIz *. ify that thi r‘ Lots 9 and ocation of a f-^ents or enc -{f- t i t X 28 foot ch stool ond tching tho t location m bo- ! ovorgroon ivo a circular . Tho garago B a flowor Its, loss of tho too costly m bo in B (back sido) Inchos fro* s garago d would be tnuo. rconoalcal •uct tho view :lear1ng trees mm§ m !?. ?wi? f .^YSTAL PLACE .5 v.:.^'V 'MM ^'PO! Z -n /yTt/’#r»’C fCO./A tmc**SurccP It' m m •;is j /Oo . /£ ’ f m • /CtJ* i“4 t W “Ify that this is a true and correct representation or i. su vey of the f Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Navarre Heights, and ail existing Puildi09S. ar.dl ocation of a proposed garage thereon. It does not purport :o show any enionts or encroachments. K'm >1 J Mi ir # r.v;i .‘.V.J ■ >i-<-. •fi «M- <M * * * •- ^ »♦» m 1 m ■ : ,>^C>-^..';;,; : :v.A. • !«..' 'inftfTffgFFC-L^ • . *“ .. . ♦ (jSOO^l6^' Z^Atti^ ^s~yo 30.X_zjjl 7 . -...-.2^2-X/3 l^tfCAfS ____‘i^.'^ 20 T)<t|\/i?yjAr^ _____________ Ifl fiu^trdf^C^, . 2-X X27 /S' X70 /♦vt Z3>y<iS‘ 27< lo //vZ/iUjfJ-'-OF /p? ' /AjCt. >ctN«ei_‘’ AJ.^eL, t Mr ♦ -“ • • " « "“k w ^ — — * ------- ^ - « 4^S> 30;c2,s 670 3<yoficiiXf ITTOAi-^-C-< t 3S2^ =• yi^7£* ^ /5»5^4r% y v: It® Ms Y*- J5- * M 11 ii? ■ A.. i'-J ;#.;3 TO: FROM: DATS: Subject List of Ex Ex Ex Discuss Th meeting for f u Commls) consld< propert Nc garage St altern tin she willin survey. Ir applies lot li extreme existlr e limi.n< logics; Al of the little the it< hardshd will t found : hardco plasti< Staff ] p: been s reconun* the ha ■■i-^ V ■k- '. : I rkcM^h r!*> ^ •■ TOs Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: DATS: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning AdministratOir November 17r 1988 #1346 Einar Hagberg, 740 North Arm Drive - Variance - Referral From Council For Further Review Exhibit A - Notice of Council Action Dated 10/26/88 Exhibit B ~ Survey Showing Proposed Hardcover Removals Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 10/20/88 Council reviewed this application at their October 24th mA«<*lna and voted 5 to 0 to refer this item back to Planning Commisison ?or further consider at i^^^^ Specifically, the council asks Planning Commission to determine whether a hardship exists and ask applicant consider alternatives to the additional accessory structure on the property. Note that Council indicated they would likely allow the proposed garage to be 5' from the sewer line (see staff memo of 10/2bj. staff met with the applicant on 11/16/68 to 1^^^ alternatives. Applicant notes that he is willing to remove the 10 x lo tin shed near the boat house, since the shed is hf^tta^^willing to remove the plastic from the two areas shaded on the attac survey• In discussing the potential for expanding the existing 9»rage the applicant noted that the existing attached garage is lot line and extending it to create more storage space would involve an extreme side setback variance. Also, it is apparent that expansion existing garage further northward would be relatively expensive eliminaM^SiS main entranceway to the house. There does not seem to be any logical way to expand the existing garage. Applicant notes he would prefer not to reduce the 24* dimension of the proposed garage. His existing garage is not Y“y "2 little stoW space. Applicant noted he ILTf?nding ofthe items he needs to store, which may provide the basis for a findl g hardship. Note that with the proposed hardcover removals, final hardcover will be decreased from 18.6% to 17.7% in the 0-75 zone. *" "“2 found in staffs 75-250' original hardcover calculations, hardcover is 31.5%. Applicant proposes to ot 28 7% plastic, resulting in final 75-250* hardcover of 6235 square feet or 28.7%. recommendation for approval would be appropriate, accompanied y the hardships. n "'■A, m. ..vr h' •' ^ ClfF OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Ml TO:Einar Hagb 740 North Mound, MN ttpb of applici DATE OF NBBTIMC COORCIL ACTION To refer 1 exists, also structure on t; Council e be 5* from the This itei Commission at t Mike Gafi various a Item If you dej are available approval by th I. • 4 M -i mlni8trator teview rals :heir October 24th Lanning Commisison :il asks Planning i ask applicant to structure on the allow the proposed 10/26). uss hardships and sraove the 10* x 10* apart. He also is »d on the attached xisting garage the ly 2* from the side s would involve an St expansion of the expensive and would 1 not seem to be any 24'x 24* dimension ry big and contains i for you a list of Ls for a finding of LSf final hardcover one. An error was Existing 75-250* square feet of juare feet or 28.7%. ether a hardship has rariance. If so# a »®panled by a list of *%:. m liiii ' APPLICATIOII HO. 1346 CITY OP OROHO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN NOTICB OP COUNCIL ACTION 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 10/26/88 TOs Einar Hagberg 740 North Arm Drive Mound# NN 55364 COPIES: type op applications Variance DATE OP MEETINGS 10/24/88 VOTES 5 For 0 Against IHCII. ACTIOH - HOnOR: TO refer back to Planning Commission to consider whether « exists# also to consider alternatives to this additional accessory structure on the property. Council expressed that they would likely allow the proposed garage to be 5* from the sewer line. Hike Gaffron will meet with you prior to that meeting to various alternative proposals you might present to the Planning Commission. If vou desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are aval?able froS the City border or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. '0 I- . is^11 ii v: i Wm p iiV’.s’ ■m m i .✓ CITY OP ORO P.O. Box 66 Crysta1 Ba^ TOs Einar 740 N< MoundI type op API DATE OP ME] r COUNCIL AC To re exists# a structure Couic be 5* frcm This mission Mike various al If yo are avail approval 1 1346 L ACTIOS 10/26/88 Lher a hardship >nal accessory posed garage to \f the Planning I 7:00 ing to discuss Ring Comission. minutesr they cer review and a\ ■i3 L'’rvS*t f D.-'. r; r -1 y.VtvxH)I-V- '•£ia U Ir -. A '■ ■'! ,-r.i -fey \\ i'j !!• •- CITY OF OROHO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION HO. 1346 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTIOS Date of Notice: 10/26/88 TO:Einar Hagberg 740 North Arm Drive Mound# MN 55364 COPIES: type of APPLICATION: Variance ilHG: 10/24/88DATE OF VOTE: 5 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: exi.t?, =onsVdr^"?ter^^^^^^^ to th”'"rddrt?o!:" “acSetSor? Structure on the property. council axpre...d that they would likely allow the proposed garage to be 5* from the sewer line. This item will be sf «duled for ,V, |?o*oV.i?K nission at their next meeting (Monday, Movember sx, xx«.j elMM approval by the City Council. :_ mm Applicatic Zoning Dii List of E3 Exhil Exhil Exhil Disoussioi Plea applicant area near Hard proposed, be increa hardcover In r above the to mainta on extens from both approach # 75-250 ’ h Commissii hardcover The a 5-0 vot removals. Sewer Loc Sine additionx^ storage « system f garages t side of ' relocate should ca 1346 XL ACTIOH j 10/26/88 Bth«r a hardship Lonal accessory oposed garage to by the Planning i8l 7s00 p«ai*)* iting to discuss nning CosBoission. 1 minutes, they fter review and stfei® •i iMr : m?:: ! imm ■ ’:V. . - ^ To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Prom: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 20, 1988 Subject: #1346 Einar Hagberg, 740 North Arm Drive Variance - Resolution Application - Hardcover variance to construct a detached storage garage. Zoning District - LR-IB ExhSit**A*'- Staff Drawing on Survey Indicating Sewer Line Location s Proposed Garage Location Revision ,,v/«n/pp Exhibit B - Planning Commission Action Notice of IO/20/80 Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibit of 10/13/88 Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of October floor applicant proposes to construct a detached storage garage of 576 s.f. floor area near the northwest corner of his property. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 2,070 * °5 ,^®-®/'32*9S’'*’„hiVwlIlld Enr/e-aseTbTiro i?f^%’u;”t^. ^ ^9hLdcover is 900 s.f. or 30% and will increase to 996 s.f. or 33.2%. In reviewing this, Planning Commission felt that the above the municipal sewer line, which is not Iriven It :“ten:ive\r but“s'erves a public purpose thls“ry^L'’an“^nu^“u:tfrom both sides of the hardcover calculation, l^ile this may approach, making ®2^5^%beVor^ the^new garage is included. Planning Co;:;^“Li"o""d\7"of flel that'rt%«" n"e%"elsar? to remove any existing hardcover on the property to accommodate this hardcover increase. removals. Sewer Location Issue - since the Planning Commission review, ^®°°'l®tv'^noar^^ additional sewer line exists along the north line of the ^ ^ .. , storage garage. This line apparently \he proposed system flushing point. Because that P^P* J g would be 10^' eithergarage, and the standard easement for sewer purposes wouia owner 2?5e%f the pipe, it is «PP>^°P*^i»’^r ,eS^ Th!^relocate that proposed garage to be at least 10 from the sew..r should cause no apparent problems for the property o Zoning Fi! October 2( Page 2 of This granted o City Attc ever gran this 197 sporadica property < of the pai Staff Reo Base< approval condition ninistrator i storage garage* er Line Locationi & 0/20/88 &er 13r 1988. The ige of 576 s.f. floor 6%, with no change »r 32.9% which would >500* zone existing ,f. or 33.2%. he gravel driveway lould the City need I and is not driven should be excluded B nay be an unusual dcover of 11.5% and icluded. Planning nove any existing increase. etlng* recosaaended on Lthout any hardcover s discovered that an the property near the ses# but is used as a 5* from the proposed s would be 10* either t the property owner the sewer line. This ker. Zoning File #1346 October 20# 1988 Page 2 of 2 This also brings up the questions of whether s^wer easements have been a° setej Ta^s^^^nt wa: ever granted for this property, and if not (which would not be unusual for this 1973 sewer project for which permanent easements were only sporadically obtained) this might be an appropriate time to as)c the property o%mer to grant such an easement. The City would talce care of all of the paper work and create an appropriate legal description. Staff RecoBBendation - Based on the Planning Commission recommendation# staff would recommend approval of the hardcover variance for the storage garage subject to the conditions: 1. Storage garage shall be moved approximately 5’ further south to maintain a 10* setback from the existing sewer line near the north line of the property. 2. The property owner is advised that the existing boat house ard shed within the 0-75' setbac)c zone are considered non-conforming structures per the current zoning code# and are subject to the pertinent codes governing such structures. 3 If it is determined by the City Attorney that a permanent easement for the existing sewer lines has never been granted# tne property owner shall grant such an easement# the paperwork and legal description to be provided by the City. A resolution for approval based on the above conditions is attached for Council review. ~ /JO U mmm ements have bean he survey. The rer easement was be unusual for snts were only ;ime to ask the take care of all on. f would recommend e subject to the further south to i near tho north boat house ard non** conforming subject to the snnanent easement id, tne property work and legal ions is attached -o .-.A w msm li ••v ' - r- J( nm /25V/Ps'-s- > • 1/^ f I .so' -Cls/^feL. I> V /0-(r=>c' r Lk.f --z ^ y/'/s - /<?- -2^\'~) arO ”7 O y •V' 2,‘t' . S’ u/to vs 5^.9 v; ^ --- ^,*7^ ^ (2^CA'V!£-’_- ? i, '^oo ^ jnc* ? iCV^•^ — O O 9oo « :Q ,/^> 2seo _ » / / . t> /■ O '-/ •=» /'->•:-»/« co/rv C»V / 0 \ ■] (JA2. I- \u .•V-i fail*--' ■■ PS ■■; V.^': ♦1 CITY OF 0 P.O. BOX Crystal I TOs Ein2 740 Moui Pi requiri drivewa providi: include hardco\ 31.8% w II minute approVi mm iWiiii II mMLv ^ 55323 CITY OF OROFO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay» Elnar Hagberg 740 North Arm Drive Moundr MN 55364 ZONING PILE NO. 1346 sotice of piahming comhissioh actios 473-7357 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Datejf Jotice:__10/20/88 COPIES TO: type of APPLICAMO"' variance_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _---- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ° Against date of SBBTISG: 10/17/38 Planning Cc-i..lon r.co«.nd- the £ollo-in,: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES ABD SPECIAL COSDITIOSS: without Planning Conunission reconuaendeJ^ appro^^^ cit^by requiring the “°lake is hardcover that bene^^^^^^^^ driveway leading to the municipal se^er, percentages of s;rirr/. ^».'V.oV.. - - <1 Cl r wnen - -- - - ,^«nfs next scheduled meeting is confirmed as Applicant 7,00 p.m. City council Monday, October _ _ _ __ _ _City council Monday, octooer , pi.„„i„g commission Approval by the Planning Commission. ytl^ /h^enlO /;TTAC**<^ eiJ€ki€ ^ ^ .^riAT t’VAS -W..C s.5^^\ir ^ fhf^ ' A; ■ . q- -4 V- ■•V. my-'i'. ri.A.'tr3W:- e. i;: / From: Date: Svd> jeet s Applicatio Zoning Dis List of Ex Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Pertinent 1.Appli of th mere] to ha 2.Exist Exist incli grave prope lines The p zone, that 30% t 0-75* 75-25 250-5 3.There propi non-h garac stair Note consi it. 1346 >11 ACTIOH otice: 10/20/86 lara^c without at the grave 1 ;s the City by e should not be percentages or zone (or ifc 7s 00 p.ra* ing Comii»ia»io» •r review and fTitS , • * Pertinent Facts ~ 1. ■■■K.w ■%-m Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 13» 1988 #1346 Einar Hagberg, 740 North Arm Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Application - Hardcover variance to construct a detached storage garage. Zoning District - LR-IB List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Flat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Staff Hardcover Calculations Applicant is proposing to construct a storage garage near the west end of the property. This garage# of 576 s.f. and one story# is intended merely for storage of lawn equipment# boat# etc. and is not intendcu to have an apron or a driveway leading to it. Existing hardcover on the property in the 0-75' zone Existing hardcover in the 75“250' zone is 32.9%. These figure include a graveled driveway area that# while being only partially graveled# provides access to the lake from the high part of the property# and also provides access for maintenance of the City sewer lines which are directly below it. The proposed garage is partially in the 250-500' zone. In the 75-250' zone# the proposed garage adds 480 «vf. of hardcover# which increases that to 35.6%. In the 250-500' zone# hardcover would increase from 30% to 33.2%. Hardcover Survey 0-75' 75-250* 250-500' Existing 2#070 s.f. (18.6%) 7#148 s.f. (32.9%) 900 s.f. no%) Proposed No Change 7#724 s.f. (35.6%) 996 s.f. (33.2%) There are a few areas of landscape rock over plastic sheeting on the property, which are potentially hardcover areas that could be made non-hardcover as a trade-off for the additional hard surface %i^th t e garage. These areas occur between the house and the lakesnore stairway. constructed in 1960 and is as is the small chad next toNote that the existing boat house was considered as a non-conforming structure# it. I iliilM*iiiwwicinii ■ v» . Zoning File #1346 October 13, 1988 Page 2 of 2 Biscusaioa - The applicant notes that this storage garage is intended for storage of his lawn care equipment and other miscellaneous items for which he has no other storage room. Although the gravel driveway leading to the lake is only partially graveled, and is only driven on perhaps half a dozen times a year, it is still technically considered hardcover for this review. Staff has not discussed specific hardcover removals with the owner, however, it appears there is enough rock over plastic on the property that removals of the plastic could equal the additional hardcover proposed with the garage, hence there is potential for a result of no increase in hardcover on the property. The garage is located lower than the road, and some drainage is directed toward it. For many years the applicant has had a tile line which outlets next to the gravel drive, perhaps 100' back from the lakeshore. Although the garage is intended to be over this tile line, there would appear to be no great concern with possible future clogging of that line and if it did clog, water would naturally flow around the back side of the garage and generally follow the property line on dovm. Staff RecoHBendatloii - Given that this garage meets the required 10* side and rear {setbacks for a lakeshore lot, staff would recommend approval subject to the condition that as much hardcover be removed as is being added with the new garage, by removing plastic from below 576 s.f. of the existing rock beds. * P / <- • - t- f / :*/Z W nded £or storage for which he has 19 to the lake is f a dozen times a review. with the owner, he property that er proposed with no increase in sme drainage is tile line which I the lakeshore. ne, there would Lng of that line back aide of the \C rear setbacks subject to the ded with the new iting rock beds. m iii mm ■'4:-i 'iUi* ■ m 4' % ^t>? \r mm- ■ ■>>1 mm.I L CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Wm I WJ W 1, • r i r /% - .,-1^ f*rr T*"^c # -i^rr.MUi- L.*i f lUA. i •r,nv/V;riAi) 'VVV PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 7 h C .Qa,^u^ ■ -fcl V W< t h. rr-Ju-Lif A*-i. wv • W nt L. fr,-, /V 9 w T mm *7*U.'//Tf #1 /$.nitn 1 uu UW V A # T f 2*. iWA < av * »/// 4. a* Property Identification Number (P.I.D. )f(fe 5 4^3 COC'^ Please check one -* Property abstract or V torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name ^ Phone (home) V / x ^ 0 X, 7 is T~lAddress: '/^C OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (work) City ; ____ Zip:_£f2liLZ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City;Zip: Date Property Acquired cZu^. ‘s C (month/year) (T 1 (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST 2-«f < 2.«/ -STcrac^ Describe request in det^l Estimated Cuiiatruction Cost iAjKz!^ ’^7* t") • '* VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) mm \ 4 - ■Mkm. m ^ ^ m •■•■1mrm-: wm V ; ■■ , il:. HARDSHIP Desci enf ox DBSCRIPTIC Descr Code REQUIRED S . Compl ,4^h2. -^Certi this 348-3 3. *i^a^tanii names oJ>tai 4. i/t?erti; 5. Topog in ex 7 • As an any o 8. Addit. The Appli< remember 1 informatioi Certificat: Zoning Offj APPLICANT'S The applit requested unusual exj the inforn knowledge. Applicant's OWNERS SIGH The owner J authorizes agents/ Com tion and ve , Oimer's Sig Applicant Planning third fHoi revii^w me unable tc authorize^ Office of :■ ■ •' O V « m • • ,^ rk,.,4»pc r^crrrc I ^i\rr:’i^tm ,_j «»wi .* A Wi» ^ 4 dk W »• w V V'V V vs rr.fC,-\ ,v ^ w V* • V V •* • ••%i.* «• j >w*i n ler. , V 4 iiT w* • WV ii» ; ^ t t tm» i r4' Vi i I . I .'iTrfiTJH I ww -• A7f A rt4 A W4 V • r .• : • r »f I f (u*v V A rf - ( 4 w r.c /--n ^ V/.* C4 rrens? uded on A f f ^t / X.. ) -L > 5s rork) >Zip; ^ > "5 d V ork) Zip: (month/year) land. Residential on Coat ^ // / «'t 1 cover Rear) Ml •r.^. mm ; :' (V' f >; ::t-; arJ.-:'vT i A ^*ic H ■Mk -v.*■■ . 'v-: . :f. iri . ■ jA HARDSHIP :i" Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; »• -i-V' DESCRIPTION OF UNUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements;_ _ _ SQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 14,1^2. -^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 04 -//7 -a3 1^3 0004, —*^btamped/ legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels V -a- 4. 5. ojptained with property owners list). ertificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. this application. Please not complete if the above Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best oi' his/her knowledge• Applicant's Signature /I;> / % Date y<y^^T Y / 7OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. , Owner's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Applicant must have all submittals intc/^he City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Iting from strict iance with Zoning (you must obtain A-603 Govt Center d to each of the s address labels IS as required. 1} if any changes separate list of cn. cation. Please te if the above on is complete, te ion required or all fees and/or rid certifies that best of his/her oL / ~ /?5 f tion and further* ff, consultantSf es of investiga-* S days before the are held on the It all scheduled an applicant is auints to have an kiildlng 6 Zoning , .<<«i ♦ \ 4 ^ X Ml Ml XT ““li *««»g asiis FIn =|iiis ‘.Sis'^ KMi moiXSSB l|8S|® iJig* 9fG o m msn!3 aI scS- i*gg5* ^oSxK! 5 S»“< « Ml SES si SoMixg ^ O Ml HI |( m |S^ ;l£ j 2iM“®^S^Si s o m ESm M if|S. i^£-<♦Sis n m ^ ^; ilSEE 1®< s SARDSHIP Desc enf c DBSCRIPTI Desc Code REQUIRED . Comp irtbr2. -^Cert this 348- 3. -i^^Stain Jj? 4. i^e: name ta; erti 5. Topoc in ea ?T^.-5pPlat 7 • As ar any c 8. Addit The Appli remember informatio Certificat Zoning Off APPUCAMT'i The appli requested unusual ex; the inforo knowledge. Applicant *f OUMBRS SI6I The owner ; authorizes agents. Coir tion and ve Owner's Sig Applican Planning third Me review m unable t authorizs Office o I w **^*W m i ■■»’-•i'?*'-7^^ /y du^ if) bardsbip enlorceLnro" z^“ing\^°uu"tdifficulty resulting fron. strict DESCRIPTION OP ONUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS cldrRe|uirementsr°^®"*'^ conditions preventing compliance with Zoning b->:J REQUIRED SUBMITTALS *^1. Completed Application Form Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels ^tained with property owners list). address labels Survey including hardcover calculations as required. in'^el?t??i° (existing and proposed elevations) if any changesin existing grade are proposed. ^ wianges Map (obtained with property owners list). application, please attach a separate list of a aSL^ 1 notified of this application.^8. .Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. 5. this application. Please not complete if the above Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application ircompleter Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information r.mn ,-«.i requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to mv all unusual expenses incurred in review of this application.^and certifies that Wledg°e!"“"'°" to °theTest"*^:f“h?s/t:r Applicant * s Signature ^ / 1 _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ Date —/7.^ V OWNERS SIGNATURE . ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and furth#bf authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by Citv staff cnn«ni <-anf*e agents. Commission members, and Council members for numnettc^^ tion and verification of this request P">^P°ses of investxga- V Owner 1^-^)__________ Date )T '/f'i-i ** ""** ** "* ** *** ** ** ** *"* *** *"* ** ** ^ mm mm mm mm mm mm mm *^^**"**—^——*—*^———————w Applicant must hav^2 all submittals into'^the Citv office*? #-via» third^Mond^^^of eTch m^^^ Planning Commission Meetings are held on the review meet-inJl^of^K 2?^^% Applicants must be present at all scheduled unable to aVlen,f^ Coi^ission and Council. if an applicant is authorised m ^ scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an Office of thfrchangrprior^t^the^m^ advise the Building & Zoning t' «L in 0 suiting from strict pliance with Zoning O' (you must obtain i A-603 Govt Center led to each of the se address labels ons as required, ns) if any changes I separate list of Lion. ication. Please ete if the above ion is complete. ate tion required or ell fees and/or and certifies that best of his/her ition and further aff, consultants# ses of investiga* 15 days before the ■ are held on the at all scheduled f an applicant is eaents to have an luilding & Zoning e • • I . ifr f ~7t/0 A^eitTW- I g?(nr7^c» BOfeT" t>ecK Patio (AJ>ferVK,S /tf.yir J.') /C . /4. /o / /o 2 x/6 <a»AWPU t>/2J ?CO '2-0'7Q j 6, 4. / oo » —A*0 ftHANCjtS — \ -asc?' (^A -2 S. / X 4/0. / // 2.-7 2Y.O X 2,1.f 52^ -"-i' /./ WAufcs S-S' X//C> 2- O c. <: n& /VO /yr 20 ?(/l _ :;r3 7/*/€)34^ m.^-. i i ,;i r. 'M ' A ^,v‘ fe.-: ■ . •F ( . f 1 > t • ■j- .-f -f t-'.- 6^ ife3« u- i. f/t< aso- c /I t]:- ■ -■ /"?2, ■2-or?Q_s,^ A*" .1 > 5tn ■tf • •■ ♦-'♦ •)*' <- -• # li s|| ‘Pfc "i' ■t;-. ::f k-v 3s Ik, ■V;:- pP9Vfr^.Tf«lisw.-»'^-''‘*^a*ite.,.:v'«rT,i .ijfeilMl —rf>t» ’uja<xs /0/^,S~ ^ ,sx2.r <£> iDgcK ?S x”. 54MJI5U ’bfelUg U 3725P ;^o f IVM ■ .,■» •♦ ^ ♦ «•* :2/l^ ± f, 1 ■■■ _____________________- ^ ^^ . . _ trjyjU t.i. CM. -y j^r t(,T«> ^ 3fc<!F^. »3000 „.... — ^00 t f. ~ 30 >^>fOpijJti-.- 23. :'«ii .;>: .1'■ vViii • * •V- - •:% 4 ' .» t T iH O Ife Cl ~fpC7 1/ o % .V #«• •^■4,‘^7 ' >■ • ' .■<»;« mumm' 2 •J 8 5 5 8 ^z* I• XX kS8i! :!sc *5ss!^l ^ m I 8 m i SS^a*"2 K l$ei IH I \v/' ■-•'•. ■:■^.'./,L ^ .j:a«•i . ; • ••: .-7.'•'• .'•V: '^ '• ^ I--' “1 tfX ‘V ^ r.’'. I' Wfll ■■;'■-■■■■ :•M IKi i :i1 '2 V .,:^ U * 2-SP-! ......i 5 e I* ^Sr -■;•:. ,■ •‘:; \ w ■ 1-: m •V ■ ;::v ^mmmm •• •. I •.._ .7.. . • <; : =>v-r , 'Wk*N '^V *VtCttr. UJAriXS /Olyc.^ ^,sx2-r ce> (£) J^cK 78 GtMi^ 13AI^6 // x«?i. It>3 i&JfMM.. ^/L\\jf fy t4.i...J 1^ >«/? Z23 Vl¥5^|l 4 * I » . -----------------^ -------f :• ftI i 4-' . .-.ti C^/fZ.Q ____/«^0 !' I ak>». • • f4— IV)') ' m--»^ •« *< t "DJ '{-^ '*7.^_(, "7^0 ^ 7 r 2SO' ^^^77yK» /^)>\T70O ^ ^g>Q g-4, ^a<T?a*^ aP 5^^ S '^. ^A)€. ,692,6 ■ " ---------------------------------------------------- Z'SO-^fP ( » 6000 s i, j-_________ 'D/2-iI/c A^a ^i^yzjo - f<3z> f/. = zc'/» v^j>if)piuir^^ si;. “23. •?. -liM >'4 'Mm mm:. i: .*> M v-1 m. ■m -rnmm^ Tos Ftoh : Dates Subject s Applicati pool Zoning Dia List of Ba Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Exhib Pertinent 1.On Se swimin Shady swinun: aetba the p: chanc4 ninin erosi< wmy.';y--> ■■/ ■■ To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:November 14, 1988 Subject: #1353 John and Nancy Fiebelkorn, 2730 Shadywood Road - After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Application - Request for after-the-fact variances to construct swimming pool and associated patio in 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Zoning District - LR-IB, Single Feunily, 1-Acre, Sewered Ust of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Application Including Applicants' Hardship Statement Plat Map Property Owners List Neighbors' Letters of Non-Objection Survey with Drainage Proposal Staff Sketch on Survey Site Plan Landscape Plan Hardcover Calculations Hardcover Calculations as Revised by Staff Drainage/Run-off Calculations from Applicants' Engineer Photo From Lagoon Area 1970 Airphoto (Lot Vacant) Pertinent Facts - 1.On September 6, 1968, staff was advised by an anonymous caller that a swimming pool was being constructed near the lakeshore at 2730 Shadywood Road. Upon investigation, staff found that an in-ground swimming pool had been constructed totally within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. A Stop Order was Immediately posted. Staff met with the property owners on September 13, 1988, and advised them that the chances of gaining after-the-fact approval for the construction were minimal at best. The property owners were advised to place proper erosion controls immediately, until the situation was resolved. pi- % .^■1 f Zoni Nove Page 2. 3. 4. S. I a . Administrator ywood Road - to construct swimming back zone. ed rdship Statement Staff pplicants* Engineer lonymous caller that a e lakeshore at 2730 ind that an in-ground In the 0-7S* lakeshore sted. Staff met with advised them that the the construcrion were ^ised to place proper n was resolved* .y .-‘.y vl 'S3 y 'A '.* ewf^i - Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 2 of 6 3. 4. 5. The survey provided by the applicants Indicates the location of the shoreline, but does not verify that the shoreline has been drawn in at the 929.4' elevation. It is staff's opinion after viewing the site, that the 929.4 elevation contour is approximately 15' from the proposed pool apron. However, all hardcover calculations have been made based on the shoreline as shown on the survey, for the sake of simplicity. The entire sub-surface pool structure was completed prior to the Stop Work Order being posted. No work has continued since that date. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone prior to commencement of construction included paved parking area, concrete patio, and portions of a second story deck. These areas comprise 868 s.f. or 10.9% in the 0-75' setback zone. Proposed hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 2,261 s.f. or 28.4%. No hardcover is normally allowed in the 0-75' zone. In the 75-250' zone, pre-existing hardcover ^(including approximately 1,250 s.f. of rock beds underlain by a porous fabric), is approximately 7,387 s.f. or 70.0%. Applicants propose to remove a portion of the driveway in the 75-250' zone, but also wish after-the- fact approval for a 64 s.f. pool maintenance and supply building, which was also constructed recently and which was found by the surveyor to be encroaching 3’ over the line into the neighboring property. The net result is a decrease in hardcover of 62 s.f. in the 75-250' zone, resulting in 69.5% final hardcover. HARDCOVER SUMMARY Existing Hardcover 0-75': 868 s.f, or 10.9% Proposed Hardcover 2,261 s.f, or 28.4% 75-250'; 7,387 s.f. or 70.0%7,335 s.f. or 69.51 The specific code sections for which a variance would be heeded for after-the-fact approval are as follows; Zoning Novemt Page 3 T r & r. t H a t; ai li ■ ... the location of the has been dra%m in at 8r viewing the site, ately 15* from the Leulations have been 'ey, for the sake of ed prior to the Stop nee that date. Bnt of construction portions of a second 10.9% in the 0-75* one is 2,261 s.f. or -75* 2one. uding approximately >rou8 fabric), is propose to remove a ilso wish after-the- d supply building, I was found by the to the neighboring er of 62 ».f. in the irdcover or 28.4% or 69.5% ^Olild be needed for -5 4 F: K ■■■M >iK-y'-H- r.■ V -i. Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 3 of 6 6. A) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Structures are not allowed within the 75* lakeshore setback zone. B) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - This pool is considered an accessory structure that is located closer to the shoreline than the average lakeshore setback line, past which no encroachment is normally allowed. C) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - The proposed structure constitutes hardcover in excess of the 0% hardcover allowed in the 0-75* setback zone, and Includes land alteration to raise the grade approximately 3* higher than the pre-existing grade, where no such land alteration Is normally allowed in the 0-75* zone. D) Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Also prohibits structures and land alteration within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. E) Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - The required side yard setback for any structure is 10*. There is no basis on which the City can grant approval for a structure that straddles a property line. Note that although this structure is less than 120 s.f. in area, hence it does not technically require a permit, it still must meet the zoning setback requirements. The applicants are proposing to mitigate the effects of the additional run-off created by the pool and patio, by constructing the pool apron such that all water falling on the pool and patio is contained within the pool itself, with an overflow discharge at a presumably slower rate into a drainfield to be located adjacent to the pool. Similar types of run-off infiltration structures have been suggested by the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District for use in lakeshore areas, however, such a practice has not been adopted in Oreno. Note that, if the drainfield system works as proposed, most of the debris and nutrients carried in the run-off would be carried into the ground for natural dispersal into the watertable. ’’jlN iB are not allowed L is considered an ;he shoreline than no encroachment is oposed structure Icover allowed in ation to raise the iting grade r where the 0-75* zone. Its structures and icK zone. tquired side yard basis on which the raddles a property s than 120 s.f. in permit, it still of the additional Lng the pool apron I contained within tresu.iably slower be pool. Similar i suggested by the use in lakeshore id in Qrono. Note tost of the debris Id into the ground i m-■ -y \ 11:.■ j 1 1 ■ >■i ■'tkt 1 W:1 $ J !'■ i'.mtm Zoning Pile #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 4 of 6 7. In addition to not meeting any of the City of Orono's requirements, the pool and patio does not meet the minimum 50* setback for structures as is required by the DNR for new structures, and does not meet the criteria for being less than 250 s.f. in area as is currently proposed by the DNR in their proposed shoreland standards. For the record, the City of Orono since 1975 has maintained stricter land use and setbacks for lakeshore properties than are required by the DNR. The City has the legal right to require more restrictive standards than the DNR. 5. The applicants suggest that past dredging of the lagoon adjacent to their property is a hardship, because it has made the lot area smaller. In fact, the dry buildable lot area has not changed substantially since 1970, as can be verified by a review of the 1970 airphoto attached as Exhibit M. The house was constructed in 1972, the current restrictive lakeshore zoning standards which were adopted in 1975. However, the house itself essentially meets the current 75* lakeshore/10* side/35' street setbacks. Without a doubt, this property is very restricted by current zoning ordinances. However, these restrictions are similar throughout the neighborhood and the community, and there is nothing unique or unusual about this particular situation. Regarding the applicants' description of unusual property conditions, the applicants make the statement "rear-yard area is a blaff dropping * relatively sheer face at the rear to the shores of an inlet dredged out to Lake Minnetonka. The surface of applicants' rear yard is not visible from Lake Minnetonka. The existence of a pool or proposed decking surrounding a pool cannot be seen from Lake Minnetonka." It is a fact that the lagoon is considered part of Lake Mlnnet'^nka, that the applicants' pre-e:clsting rear yard was very visible from the lagoon area under norma.', lake elevation conditions, and that the pool, proposed decking, anr' proposed 2-3' high retaining wall 15* from the normal shoreline of Lake Minnetonka will be very visible encroachments into the required setback area. Staff would note that the entire yard area from the house to the lake is less than a 5% slope, and in no way can be considered a bluff area such as you might find on Casco Point, where often there is a 30-50* sheer drop from the yard to the lakeshore. :’--'y:>immmimm Zoning File #1346 October 13# 1980 Page 2 of 2 DiscQSaioii - The applicant notes that this storage garage Is Intended for storage of his lawn care equipment and other miscellaneous items for which he has no other storage room. Although the gravel driveway leading to the lake is only partially graveled# and is only driven on perhaps half a dozen times a year# it is still technically considered hardcover for this review. Staff has not discussed specific hardcover removals with the owner# however# it appears there is enough rock over plastic on the property that removals of the plastic could equal the additional hardcover proposed with the garage# hence there is potential for a result of no increase in hardcover on the property. The garage is located lower than the road# and some drainage is directed toward it. For many years the applicant has had a tile line which outlets next to the gravel drive# perhaps 100' back from the lakeshore. Although the garage is intended to be over this tile line# there would appear to be no great concern with possible future clogging of that line and if it did clog# water would naturally flow around the back side of the garage and generally follow the property line on down. Staff RecoBBsendation - Given that this garage meets the required 10* side and rear j^-etbacks for a lakeshore lot# staff would recommend approval subject to the condition that as much hardcover be removed as is being added with the new garage# by removing plastic from below 576 s.f. of the existing rock beds. % k I . •: I i: * mUi W: a. • V.:,. ;i- ■ v4 ^ P'S:m wm Zoning File #1346 October 13> 1988 Page 2 of 2 Dlscessioii - The applicant notes that this storage garage is intended for storage of his lawn care equipment and other miscellaneous items for which he has no other storage room. Although the gravel driveway leading to the lake is only partially grave led» and is only driven on perhaps half a dozen times a year, it is still technically considered hardcover for this review. Staff has not discussed specific hardcover removals with the owner, however, it appears there is enough rock over plastic on the property that removals of the plastic could equal the additional hardcover proposed with the garage, hence there is potential for a result of no increase in hardcover on the property. The garage is located lower than the road, and some drainage is directed toward it. For many years the applicant has had a tile line which outlets next to the gravel drive, perhaps 100' back from the lakeshore. Although the garage is intended to be over this tile line, there would appear to be no great concern with possible future clogging of that line and if it did clog, water would naturally flow around the back side of the garage and generally follow the property line on down. Staff RecoMBendatioii - Given that this garage meets the required 10' side and rear setbacks for a lakeshore lot, staff would recommend approval subject to the condition that as much hardcover be removed as is being added with the new garage, by rcunoving plastic from below 576 s.f. of the existing rock beds. ♦I • M K . N V ^ iW. ‘ ' , N -t r-' V ■' i ■in • .i ?r CITT OF ORONO - VARIANCE Initial Application Fee ($50.00 per each addit Renewal Variance Fee $75 (no change from origin After-the-Fact Fees (Dou PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 7 h'C H Property Identification 1 Please check one - Prope; Attach legal descriptior required survey. APPLICANT Name ^ ■IAddress: OWNER (if different than Name Address: Date Property Acquir (do not) also PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning Distr Present Use of Prope OBSCRIPTIOH OF REQUEST -S' Describe request in cZ'V* VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Bd for storage r which he has to the lake Is i dozen tines a eview. .th the owner, property that proposed with ) increase in • drainage is Lie line which ’he lakeshore. , there would g of that line ck side of the rear setbacks ibject to the d with the new ng rock beds. . / Poe •1 - - - -= !!iWH i.f ,y. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) /I ' - f-rrrrr I t.'i f luim J.U wVu, '. VW'V V J. ^C;- ,V ^ W >. ’ » W PROPERTY LOCATION ■-•jzrv U*i iCA fn lu \/ • vv i CTTvT.** i ’/AilI t uu Site Address 7 0 '/L <r "vV’.* ~rtirfiiavwxv mwwa t/// Property Identification Number (P.I.D. )Clfc 5 4^^ COC'^ _ _ abstract or _V torrens?Please check one - Property Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name x Phone (home) V/x X. ^ Z ' T~JAddress: ‘/^C Phone (work) City: OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired £tu^ , - H Z"C (month/year) 0 (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ Present Use of Property _Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST 2.^ < 'STcra^ Describe request in det^l Estimated C^»^truction Coited Ci^t^truction Cost ^ _ ____________________________________________________ ' VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other Wm4 ^V-• 'vfm I I ‘ IR f -Yiwi BARDSfflP Descrit enforce r DESCRIPTION Descrit Code Re : :REQUIRED SUE . Complet -^Certifi this li 348-327 3. «-J^tampe< oj? 4. 1/^] names c taine ertifii 5. Topogra in exis .*>5^Plat Ma' ‘ 7. As an a any oth 8. Additioi The Applica remember th< information 1 Certificatioi Zoning Officd ■V APPLICANT'S i The applica: requested b) unusual expei the informat knowledge. Applicant's £ OWNERS SIGNA1 The owner he authorizes re agents,, Coromi tion and veri , Owner's Signa Applicant mi Planning Coi third }Honda review raeetj unable to a authorized i Office of th H d HARDSBIP Describe undue hardship or practical enforcement of zoning regulations:_difficulty resulting from strict DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ ^^^It^UIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form -^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 04>-.//7-a3 1^3 OOOC> "■^tampedr legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels oj;>tained with property owners list). ertificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes , in existing grade are proposed. 4#?^••i^rpPlat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7, As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 6. .Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. this application. Please not complete if the above Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge• /I;Date /y YApplicant's Signature / 7OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, ag\ent ‘S, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investica — tion and verification of this request. ♦ r) Owner's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date ^/f^S^ Applicant must have all submittals intc/^the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. i ' -m E33' ulting frowi strict liance with Zoning * (you must obtain A-603 Govt Center ed to each of the se address labels ms as required, is) if any changes separate list of icn. ication. Please ete if the above ion is complete. site tlon required or all fees and/or and certifies that best of his/her , % itlon and further aff, consultants, ses of investiga- 25 days before the s are held on the at all scheduled f an applicant is @ents to have an Building s Zoning ■ SPisv-.^Av. ■ » r.;>!wi,cv-s®6®£J igs??; §is HARDSHIP Desc enfc DESCRIPTI Desc Code REQUIRED . Comp ^ta: Topoc in e: 7 • As ar .<■ **-A 4-**> any c Addlt The Appli remember informatio Certificat Zoning Off APPLICANT': The appli requested unusual ex; the inforc knowledge. Applicant*! ONNBRS SI6I The owner ; authorizes agentsr Con tion and ve Owner's Sig Applican Planning third Mo review m< unable t( authorize Office ol ■^<^c A/ <Uh^ /. •■'! '.- i ;, HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resultinq from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: i-«suxi:ing rrom strict DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Code“equirementsr°'’®'^*^^ conditions preventing compliance with Zoning REQUIRED SUBMITTALS * Completed Application Form within 150- (you must obtain "“^03 covt Center . •-CCTampe^T legal sized envelooes (#101 ________4-K^ u , . (#10) pre-addressed to each of the list with no return address (use address labels ^tained with property owners list). aaaress laoeis ii^ertificate of survey including hardcover calculations as reouired in^exlstii^ survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes I existing grade are proposed. * ° ii^**^pPlst Map (obtained with property owners list). application, please attach a separate list of R ?3L notified of this application.__.Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. this application. Please not complete if the above Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application ircomplete' Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/r»T- unusual expenses incurred in review of this Application, and certifies that knlwledgt!"““°" ‘upplied is true and corr'A’ct to the besrof“h?sAer Applicant's Signature 1- -T - Date — ONHBRS SI6NAT0RB rs,o”,7,v. ss cr.,'".7.v ^ 'Owner's Signature n / ^i/.•Ce^Date Applicant must have all submittals into/the City offices 2S d^ve Ho^ova ♦•ka thiAd^Min?'™^®.*^''"' Planning Commission Meetings he\d on the Applicants must be present’At" 11 schedulel IVLt^'L ”“*“"5® *=*'«. Planning Commission and Council, if an applicant is ortice Of this change prior to the meeting. suiting from strict pliance with Zoning O' (you must obtain i A—603 Govt Center ted to each of the se address labels ons as required, ns) if any changes I separate list of :ion. .ication. Please .ete if the above ion is complete. ate tion required or ell fees and/or and certifies that best of his/her J.! - ition and further aff, consultants, ses of investiga- ir /?v-■. !S days before the I are held on the at all scheduled f an applicant is Baents to have an luilding t Zoning e • * ■■r.M OnS'* e?(nrf^c» Patio (Uwn. Ml -A>o - Ztpoo 2V.O /./ ys-,3 I^Auk.s S.S~x-2,L® 10 X//(£^ 6' O 2- Y(0 O €> ■. 'nV. 4c f MZ- )C»S ‘. 'Z-CnOLxSr «/rr7A* c i /4.S1 rv-- -.M:' •• ■ ■^r/y^ :....: •;■ ';=l!lr.-;•• '•‘■r . •* ■■•*^ •; iii>.- 'll''/^er:/Olyc.^ ^ ,sx2.r <S) - « 4 ♦ ♦ #78 • «L _ /aP 'tUW'-r '!'! ivrt ■ .,•» m- ^ « irMii ■*^=?rY» j ^._f.!7^P-£j 3 X: fnofos^57^ s i. dA<. ?AY9^"^4. »t(,”700 r 3S:;4^. ------------------------------------------------------- SC'C'*. » Eoco j(?3</Sf7#i£» , __________ - fojD f/. r 3o^< >^>cnpW>r1- sivT^T^ “ 53.4^ •■ 'rV'-'k c -;i- .V :.;«;■ l-rf- • _.. , ^-ft'ft- I - i. 8 8 iiM if.-'iiLd/ .) 9vQ Ui HI *.-s MMlil s:ii» mxmksm?|3is- *Ni 2 S S'* **■^ K X. p i >• >• X f! *§8gs ssssS Mi ceases Sp£ 9t ='ifi£ Ss~38 ,S*» inc^iy HI ^ S8O -J ;IS s ^ZooS sslld 8 I 8 ::“= !3!^2 Cm ty P «j «j tt S hi M 5 Eh (k ^ ?l|H* iSt!21 mX 2 O IW “s Pp hjD ^ g M P"------^ 2^8 XEsi p|»s Su p >» m a M tt“SS I mM m, , .. I'f-' \ 3 I ''■•■"■' ■ ■■:\ '‘y? ' '■'' a^ct: «/oa<xs <S44^/(fU "CAlUjS ^irvi^. 'D/tjv^. 25£i'' ■• 'r':---V /O/^.S' ^ ,SX c£) (D78 >< li -------------^ /ap *-■♦— ••« • • ■••■«• ,>«r 4 '■:! :?iY» ^ t ^J, '!7l?0_'^3 7 r 2SD ' <> PlLofftSe^ A&b>\T7CO ; HbO cX. bff 5VU ■&^.6M~. r sfc^." ^t/. / >/ 2.Sp -S^' ^ * "SPOQ i 1 _ D/i-lt/tfVj^^^ *■ ^CfO f iT. ~ 30 ^ >4:&>ir)p<uJrw *•_^.r 23.2^/^ , k- iH -7 : - •:• : v.;-:^- .-T ■'. ."/• ■ ^'. ■f";- Mi ' ■'TO •'•'■ i k TOS From Date: Subject: Applica poo Zoning D hint of Fertinen I. •« ’■>-R I *>3 • • t . • . I *- '• f«-> lyi*) ■ -<5 t.- 7f-tso vrfsrm ta. 5VU %LCh^ s_y./x - l--A.::’v- • r:: ■•■ PC .^1 i w %. PIP*<p-^; \‘m ■■ ts^; ■iM- ■,>:i' p ■?v" r j* '•-■kW- -n-r.,,; To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson ^om: Date: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 14, 1988 Subject: #1353 John and Nancy Fiebelkorn, 2730 Shadywood Road - After-the-Fact Variance - Public Hearing Application - Request for after-the-fact variances to construct swimming pool and associated patio in 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Zoning District - LR-IB, Single Family, 1-Acre, Sewered List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Pertinent Facts - Application Including Applicants' Hardship Statement Plat Map Property Owners List Neighbors' Letters of Non-Objection Survey with Drainage Proposal Staff Sketch on Survey Site Plan Landscape Plan Hardcover Calculations Hardcover Calculations as Revised by Staff Drainage/Run-off Calculations from Applicants' Engineer Photo Prom Lagoon Area 1970 Airphoto (Lot Vacant) 1.On September 6, 1988, staff was advised by an anonymous caller that a swimming pool was being constructed near the lakeshore at 2730 Shadywood Road. Upon investigation, staff found that an in-ground swimming pool had been constructed totally within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. A Stop Order was immediately posted. Staff met with the property owners on September 13, 1988, and advised them that the chances of gaining after-the-fact approval for the construction were minimal at best. The property owners were advised to place proper erosion controls immediately, until the situation was resolved. %v. . mmi Administrator ywood Road - to construct swimming back zone. rdship Statement Staff pplicants Engineer tonymous caller that a e lakeshore at 2730 ind that an in-ground! in the 0-75* lakeshore sted. Staff met with idvised them that the the construction war# rised to place proper a was resolved. m •:.V Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 2 of 6 The survey provided by the applicants Indicates the location of the shoreline, but does not verify that the shoreline has been drawn In at the 929.4' elevation. It Is staff's opinion after viewing the site, that the 929.4 elevation contour Is approximately 15' from the proposed pool apron. However, all hardcover calculations have been made based on the shoreline as shown on the survey, for the sake of simplicity. The entire sub-surface pool structure was completed prior to the Stop Work Order being posted. No work has continued since that date. Hardcover in the 0—75' zone prior to commencement of construction included paved parking area, concrete patio, and portions of a second story deck. These areas comprise 868 s.f. or 10.9% in the 0-75* setback zone. Proposed hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 2,261 s.f. or 28.4%. No hardcover is normally allowed in the 0-75' zone. In the 75-250' zone, pre-existing hardcover'(including approximately 1,250 s.f. of rock beds underlain by a porous fabric), is approximately 7,387 s.f. or 70.0%. Applicants propose to remove a portion of the driveway in the 75-250' zone, but also wish after-the- fact approval for a 64 s.f. pool maintenance and supply building, which was also constructed recently and which was found by the surveyor to be encroaching 3' over the line into the neighboring property. The net result is a decrease in hardcover of 62 s.f. in the 75-250' zone, resulting in 69.5% final hardcover. HARDCOVER SUMMARY Existing Hardcover 0-75': 868 s.f. or 10.9% Proposed Hardcover 2,261 s.f, or 28.4% 75-250'; 7,387 s.f. or 70,0%7,335 s.f. or 69.5% The specific code sections for which a variance would be needed for Sfter-the-fact approval are as follows: Zoning Novemh Page 3 A sar the location of the las been drawn in at r viewing the site, tely 15* from the mlations have been ty, for the sake of a prior to the Stop ce that date. It of construction >rtions of a second LO.9% in the 0-75* ne is 2,261 s.f. or ^5* zone. ding approximately :ous fabric), is opose to remove a >so wish after-the- supply building, was found by the o the neighboring r of 62 s.f. in the dcover r 28.4« r 19.5i >uid be needed for Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 3 of 6 jmm A) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Structures are not allowed within the 75* lakeshore setback zone. B) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - This pool is considered an accessory structure that is located closer to the shoreline than the average lakeshore setback line, past which no encroachment is normally allowed. C) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - The proposed structure constitutes hardcover in excess of the 0% hardcover allowed in the 0-75' setback zone, and includes land alteration to raise the grade approximately 3* higher than the pre-existing grade, where no such land alteration is normally allowed in the 0-75' zone. D) Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Also prohibits structures and land alteration within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. E) Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - The required side yard setback for any structure is 10*. There is no basis on which the City can grant approval for a structure that straddles a property line. Note that although this structure is less than 120 s.f. in area, hence it does not technically require a permit, it still must meet the zoning setback requirements. The applicants are proposing to mitigate the effects of the additional run-off created by the pool and patio, by constructing the pool apron such that all water falling on the pool and patio is contained within the pool itself, with an overflow discharge at a presumably slower rate into a drainfield to be located adjacent to the pod. Similar types of run-off infiltration structures have been suggested by the Bennepin Soil and Water Conservation District for use in lakeshore areas, however, such a practice has not been adopted in Orono. Note that, if the drainfield system works as proposed, most of the debris and nutrients carried in the run-off would be carried into the ground for natural dispersal into the watertable. r s- . i Piap are not allowed La considered an t shoreline than encroachment is osed structure >ver allowed in Lon to raise the ng grade, where le 0-75* zone. t structurei and t zone. m mtmFm:'•■*• V\- :~f^: :; .•■■■.■:.■■ ■ ■ ■"-■ lired side yard lis on which the Idles a property than 120 s.f. in Brmit, it still * the additional } the pool apron :ontained within rsu.eably slower pod. Similar uggested by the le in lakeshore in Orono. Hote t of the debris into the ground Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 4 of 6 In addition to not meeting any of the City of Orono's requirements, the pool and patio does not meet the minimum 50' setback for structures as is required by the DNR for new structures, and does not meet the criteria for being less than 250 s.f. in area as is currently proposed by the DNR in their proposed shoreland standards. For the record, the City of Orono since 1975 has maintained stricter land use and setbacks for lakeshore properties than are required by the DNR. The City has the legal right to require more restrictive standards than the DNR. The applicants suggest that past dredging of the lagoon adjacent to their property is a hardship, because it has made the lot area smaller. In fact, the dry buildable lot area has not changed substantially since 1970, as can be verified by a review of the 1970 airphoto attached as Exhibit M. The house was constructed in 1972, current restrictive lakeshore zoning standards which were adopted in 1975. However, the house itself essentially meets the current 75' lakeshore/10' side/35' street setbacks. Without a doubt, this property is very restricted by current zoning ordinances. However, these restrictions are similar throughout the neighborhood and the community, and there is nothing unique or unusual about this particular situation. Regarding the applicants' description of unusual property conditions, the applicants make the statement "rear-yard area Is a bluff dropping down a relatively sheer face at the rear to the shores of an inlet Lake Minnetonka. The surface of applicants' rear yard is not visible from Lake Minnetonka. The existence of a pool or proposed decking surrounding a pool cannot be seen from Lake Minnetonka." It is a fact that the lagoon is considered part of Lake Minnet-^nka, that the applicants' pre-e2:lstlng rear yard was very visible from the lagoon area under norma', lake elevation conditions, and that the pool, proposed decking, and proposed 2-3' high retaining wall 15* from the normal shoreline of Lake Minnetonka will be very visible encroachments into the required setback area. Staff would note that the entire yard area from the house to the lake is less than a 5% slope, and in no way can be considered a bluff area such as you wight find on Casco Point, where often there is a 30-50* sheer drop from the yard to the lakeshore. H iiiiili ir Zoning File #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 5 of 6 Also note that the elevation of Lake Minnetonka (and the lagoon) on Hovenber 8, 1988 was 926.02', or 3.38* (41*) below the nornal ordinary high water level of 929.4'. Disonssion - Construction of this pool without obtaining a permit or any prior approval, can only be considered a flagrant violation of Orono's codes, regardless of the applicants' claim that they were unaware of the laws governing development of lakeshore property. Staff is unaware of any similar situation that has received appi oval before or after-the-fact in contemporary times. In the instances where the City has approved additional hardcover over and above that which pre-exists in the 0-75' zone, the majority have allowed construction only along the lines of the existing house ond no closer to the lake than the existing house. Staff is unaware of any precedent situations where hardcover in the 0-75' zone was increased from 10% to as much as 28% to construct accessory structure. This property simply is not large enough tn contain the proposed pool in the limits of what the code allows, nor within the paraFieters of the hardcover variances which have been allcv/ed in hardship situations for other properties in the City. Even if the dralnfield system does function as proposed to mitigate the effects of the run-off, the setback variance requested is an extreme variance compared to others that have been granted in the City. As noted above, approval for the construction of the pool maintenance building 3' over a neighboring property line would be approval of a new non-conforming structure, which the City cannot allow. There does not appear to be any location within the boundaries of the property other than in the driveway in front of the garage or in the street yard, which would meet the setback standards for such a structure, i.e. 10' from side lot line, 10' from any other structure, 30' from the street lot line, and no clo8«c to the lake than the existing house. Tf the pool is allowed to regain, applicants must relocate the pool maintenance and supply building. W-m 9m d the lagoon) on il ordinary high lit or any prior E Orono's codes» are of the laws unaware of any fter-the-fact in y has approved 8ts in the 0-75* :he lines of the house. Staff is I 0-75* sone was tory structure. tie proposed pool irar.et3rs of the > situations for es does function etback variance ave been granted pool maintenance proval of a new There does not perty other than ird, which would I* from side lot lot llne« and no 1 is allowed to supply building ^’nrm •v vV: V/: -■Pv.v f* Pr % Zoning Pile #1353 November 14, 1988 Page 6 of 6 Staff Reo ndatii eyh^h^^. K Planning Commission to review the materials and exhibits submitted by the applicants, it would also be helpful to view this property if you have not already done so. that ^"uatlfv’’ hardships that have been presentedthat justify allowing this pool to remain, and there are no unioue wo^l^bl^r** P^°P^rty that would suggest that those variants precedent s^e'ttTni* Approval of these after-the-fact variances would be p ecedent setting, and would in staff's opinion jeopardize the integrity of Orono-s lakeshore policies, philosophies and ordinances. The applicants were advised from the start that staff could not in anv 4^ IP Mv- -4 ■ V' K ■ .i-2- iM CITT OF Initial Ap ($50.00 Renewal Va (no chan After-the- PROPERTY Id Site Addre: Property I< Please chei Attach leg required si DBSCRIPTIOV Oescri! VARXANCBS R: J Setbacl Other , ^ •■*«'. .1 ew the materials and be helpful to view lave been presented here are no unique ihat those variances > variances would be Ise the integrity of iff could not in any il of the requested :iated materiaTs be be restored to its iff would recommend Lntenance structure, emove it from the |:y, n-v.: v'i mmw-... !%- ^ v'•« - V.'v I , i m, . ‘iirAliiC.: Vmm Hi®' , lr-vv:-'v V. ri . - ^ U- a:'-. rf'y- t^ i!'4 -a CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICAT! ©«.,>4 Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application Ui I fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 2730 Sl^ady CITY OF uRO^O Flr^At^CE of F ’^- 1350200000 01 QER 400, VO CHFrK 71 f'OL’llkmlulS I L> *?VV » VI/ itiCEir'T-THAflK YOU HliOSOO coot r<0i Tli:i -A A Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ■^4-0033 iA/OZ /: JLV/ imU/ W Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name ZToWr^ r>i, Phone (home) 54^~Q Address; r^\Ay^A.v4 City -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -^- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Phone (work) 4»n», OiU4-Q __ Zip; SS331 Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Uft- I fi %• Present Use of Property /% rr\ % \ c Residential Other Vspecify) DESCRIPTION OF RBQ Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request tn detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area OLrV"*Vo. c.\f^eoi Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other .. 1 •9^.. ►. ir ' ■ :. -. 1 ■*.IP* 'TJA ■. HARDSHII Des enf OESCRIPT Des Cod required i ■V- . • ! 8. -he Appl; remember informati< Certifical Zoning Off APPLICANT* The appli requested unusual ex the infor: knowledge. Applicant*; OWNERS £ The own< author!z agents, tion and Owner's Sig Applicant Planninc third Mo: review me unable tc authorize Office of •.a. * ; / y f * ‘V* •'^miW-l / I U»f U'i'UJtU U Cl I 4WL* a vVw'Vi.VVV V i'i £ffl ^iO.SJ i^UZi^V L,nu wn j," I i: f » ;i !TW ■ w ^ECtlPT-THAm YOU »115530 cool ROl T14:C iv/ 4,ii? ' w 54^-Q g>QQ I Ao*«»Qiu4>o « Zip: Zip: lonth/year) id. Rasidantial QSt $ Bear) . j■' MM I : ;'' n ihiAiL": ;} ■. 4 9*. «/s.: ^.■• * ^riiA /■•v.'-'ij .V.7- •:v^mm T—>1, HARDSHIP enllrc^enfol strict DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS conditions^ preventing compliance with Zoning IRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Property Owners List of owners within ISO* (vou 348-3271?/*^°”' County Department of Finance A-603 3. must obtain Govt Center naSeron thVaiott"fist":!th'’nl retuVll;*"^'^®,®^he obtained with property owners list). ress (use address labels Ttpogliphll °slr%“e7^^.xrs\Vng"f„^™ required.____Zir ^ proposed elevations) if anv chanany changes _Additional items as may be requested by'city'^S'af in existing grade art proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). complete if the aboveinformation has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance ApplIcatlon'Is Zoning Official's Sicnature cou.pxete Date required or APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE h\^:wlV/gr^‘^°" -- a-^“r?e^\^To^Theres?^1“h?s;^:^ Applicant's Signature TT X Date M*ISL^ss. OWHHRS SIGNATURE ^ author^z^e^ ^/easonable° entry *on to application and further agents. Commission memlSTrs and consultants, tion and verification of thiO requestf^ “embers for purposes of investiga- aiy submittals •ln+'Plannina Commission Meetin^c offices 25 days before the third Monday of each mon^^^^^^ Add^S^Meetings are held on the review meetings of the Pianninrr^rmust be present at ail scheduled unable to att’end a OchOdOOOd -!ee?^0”X "" ®" applicant isauthorized aoent JH'^onH <{« , lr'9» please make arrangements to have an Office of this change Prior^t0\h0^meetTng * Zoning mm wcm pi mm mM ■*V' ■,• ;► ' • '-:'.i i-yl m m Ss; c V TJ $: aj $: ai P] as va PR Si Pr Thi Th< Lai Coi Dat ApE APP Joh 273 Oroi Homi Off: (Pis Free Aver PRES Pres Pres 00961 i ' ■t-. ■ j ■;>:■..-miff.'mm-- -r’rfgg^fe ;s-' ^Hi'iy: H>A • • on fee of om the additional 9 from the sment s. indard fees fact mistered s, Hennepin J, Berg, 900 Second mm ..^ . .V . mm m-'vM m ':'' V H i-: :■■■■;. ■■■■■»■■ :;■:Mm J>v ^ W-.■^ :iW y -'iP» \ ^r-^zi r.:.. ^■ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST 1. 2. 3. Applicants request a variance from the applicable 10-foot side yard setback requirement to enable them to maintain a pool equipment shed which encroaches slightly upon the property owned by their neighbors, the Dunsheath family. When Applicants purchased the Property, the Dunsheaths advised them that a refuse container structure owned and used by the Dunsheaths encroached slightly upon Applicants' Property and requested permission of Applicants to maintain that structure. Applicants gave their consent. Applicants later constructed the subject pool equipment shed on Applicants' side of that structure. When a survey of Applicants' Property was later prepared. Applicants' discovered the true location of the Property boundaries. Their neighbors had been in error; the garbage container structure was completely on the Dunsheaths' property, and the pool equipment structure that Applicants had constructed encroached slightly upon their neighbor's land. Applicants request a variance from the 75—foot setback requirement to permit Applicants to maintain a swimming pool constructed by Applicants earlier this summer. Prior to the construction of the subject^swimming pool. Applicants were unaware of the 75-foot set-back requirement from the shores of Lake Minnetonka. Some years ago, a portion of Applicants' Property was dredged to create an inlet from Lake Minnetonka. This has resulted in the rear yard portion of Applicants’ Property being reduced in size. The pool constructed on the Property is situated on a bluff in the rear yard area, and is not visible from the lake. There is no portion of Applicants' Property more than 75 feet from the shores of Lake Minnetonka upon which a pool could have been constructed. Applicants are willing to provide such landscaping as may be required by the City to provide additional screening of the pool area. Applicants request a variance from the applicable hardcover requirements. Applicants desire to construct decking around the existing pool area in accordance with the plans attached to this Application. Because of the size of Applicants' lot, any such decking within the rear yard area would fall within the zero hard cover area. - 2 - ■ • mm mm ■ ^mm/.:1; T - : ■f. .. 4. HAROSfi The ne to a m to the The se config Applic area w. • ■: ;J ; ::'i -y-t. A-;:. .:.1 IIIo o mmino K -1 ¥%e <IKI m4 O III^ 5 HI M Q ft III €>w.c #S’- ■ r *5-,%!«•;i3r-- r jji:; ^„v.. - V-*yiV iiiiii^v- Jri.".^M■^■:■Vy•: :• .-V7 €X^'^ T> -. v v • *. d .-i^f .v; :’:'>-:^:g : V ,.'■I- Am. ■■- -i mi = !-•'■ 7 :j3>' V'^ Q r V -’.N «Vv.' *-’> >■ ^ I 1 September 12, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: I do not Object to the Flebelkorns pool project at 2730 Shadywood Road. Excelsior, Minnesota and this project does not obstruct our view In anyway. Signature O yy s( ■) ^ ^ U .A S V^a *.’4' Name (print) VO ^J?. Address §'<C^fc)nr Legal Descrlptinn Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 420, Hennepin County, Minnesota W€ U' wi' :^p» “'«‘i *i.d ’t:J V«J ■•■;*■ fAir u > 3 f vcy No. 420, SI?:;.; f M:- - ?;^= -'i*> r .'• > : ■ w . 1 W:■'*1 t*2? >i.-v ,'w. ■^! •; Slh' • »%m.: ■ mr^ t m. ».‘ii-.•"•■rf--,.'- • >T ■ r :. :-.• ‘ 'X% *•. /• * M, /O September 12, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: I do not object to the Fiebelkorns pool project at 2730 Shadywood Road, Excelsior, Minnesota and this project does not obstruct our view in anyway. /o. /-/. i Signature i'V- H AUe/^^L< Name (print)^ J Addr^^_ ^^3/c/p /^l/\.> Legal Description Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 420, Hennepin County, Minnesota tar’ M*=--Vv rr. VT K. . 'T^ lly: h • ■rl ! v';- 1 I No. an \ .• V:Vr Wmmm^:mm !. ._; •... ..: ;»e. -v>'f^-;-\-’.v './■;-cl.* ■ • r • • Tl 1 \h \r .•7 -^'1 smL-iji, ^.j .. ^ '**-» ' ' yiF •*•*.1^(0 -* 1 • / ' "f JS^i*Al-r ^ / / •!J J A - -• *\ ::c,< '■ ) ■■•' September 12, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: I do not object to the Fiebelkorns pool project at 2730 Shadywood Road, Excelsior, Minnesota and this projec does not obstruct our view in anyway. • / " "" I J'tgnature _ ^n /^aJ (L . Name (print)r—^ Addrg:t*s / legal Description Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 420 Hennepin County, Minnesota • ilr-SURVEY FOR- MR. and MRS. JOHN FiEBELKORN / "* zo / "CTAWINO WAU r'i CX. «tOUND fOOL / / / • •• •, V • f ■•i scction a I no tCALCI ROCK BED DRAIN TILE f .‘•i »#*• \ r/o<\ ,0T,1C* OISTRIBW lOX 38f*ie’«24 ‘ /L\ L-SHAPEO POOL <r: \ i--. y / / %./ / / /•REMOVE PORTKW or EX. RATIO NEW LUdE or PATIO/ITYP) Ah \ I# r /A«■ %1 V A S . >5.\ \ X PRELIMINARY ORAINAGE PLAN SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM X X WERARED FOR' \ X X \ ORONO. MN 55331 X PNErAREO rv X _ SCHOILL 4 MAOSON. INC >•#•# fi?r mm *iiij-mm►r r •:■. •••Y? paife; ' v- ■^r'. ■f; f '■ -I rjj f. % ir ORAINAOE PLAN )RPTION SYSTEM til t HAOtOli. flic. *••*** • Mma mm t«f ij ••••• • . exff.F MINNETONKA i • <Si*V° . Dn^v>■—. . »7( ^ Bo uD-c:W/H>et> /^^A- if^E>m'T^ PeC’?Oi^ f/A^A<_ /M/4»e£)CCi/£^ # ::4f:f o9 lO 9 CD xH.f r«p A > d-^ **W' i'4 ' ■■■ ;■■■■.. : • •.:. ; ">'f :•::■> -M W\;i4-l^ s?%a ft. p.: . ! IS'^ ■. Pft: ’■' »'/jfe--,."v .t: mq iiVd'M ■ •• :■ '•■ •'■•. ' ^■r ; ■> A ••^.vr:-V i .1. yjf* V # i#^ m ^2jlZL4U^ 9%49 < • •^ %4 9%99m 9%49m — mco H •O •D •Om « 0 u•m >oo•oumtc p-4mco •H 4J •o <200736COrv*o • cn 8 m m CM Ai•o » UD CM €1 M 1/:• o 00 1 r-*# 10 3 c cn cc •f"fQc •r-C tfO •f 4-»o 4- 9e IV IM % «> >o 6 fiC If 0 4J U 01 > o u •o l4 IB D*c 4J X U) t %4 •I » %4 %i %4 %4 9 9 %• 9 VO CO I • 00 CM < •tM •IM •%«••9 t •m91m9191 VO <n C7> VO r—LO •roror—r—VO 1 4i •O 01 6 O 4J M AC AC uulO lOC JOB X JO 4J •M OJ 01 I/I t/i •»o m vn in 4-> lO•o OUcc: •r*o • X •M.a;0) •F—n:b o >1 >1 lO Id c 1 5 Qi o >>4-> •r-u ooOa. t %9 9 9 %9 9 VOa% m m N «x & B ^ ^ 44 e» IX r-#o Oi «9 C !>u <•o ••U *-i 44 >#Ji m • a • •O 44 u c m ^ • 14o <w4 10 91 tk 2 um 9 S m ••9 • <1 tl m IM iR «k CM e lit cr iWi rAj. ^ - Vi cc I •o% VO ? II £ S I si« CM 00o% VO CM JJ - >o <1 It 3 *£ 00 W CMm cs e li «»su•o Itmm nm •omm to £ \ M C «pt >4 • « %t %«• m m 00 CMcm I I g • H M M » Hc • yI m m • 4« «t » ^ (it I 01 •#Ih s i 6 M 0 '•ti f. •iirV • ./ '•u ■ • ■ A. ••...■ W-ai!' .ii ,».V -m£- fra fr; ••. i f «>c«. XI*t24svti^ ^ ZT7^0 X WAr^ytiJeob (^>f««e«a4Mr £Ats^ 6»^_c*«<w/Fy ^“•7^ P^t^-t9</C77^JC• a.*7^flro 4.4. _ • > • •* *• »- • I ;l ^ruL^ ^ t«ivew«.<y ..C^J>V»a0 sbVs.-C, 3 «.*/ t/. ;i .;' e£b i 0*>S" •i ti Pfiofont^ - •t ftOL, ^ ^PA _ , pjsrto 5vtfCieAMAJ& fisn^/t> e^C»y- /n') /^7i s^'. 90 , syr s.-C.• « # .4 2|iC. / 4 .-(-. 2tUf -fjlfO jzi.^yL j f£bposifA. O’y^* />>g^>ty/^T7MC> MeA* sJl, ^ ............ .: * /^rz I.-C. .. . . I Arr. (MA0€ {z.\7> X 32.^) » "7^^ i.4. . _ 1 3>ieiUtn-»A^ 5^-. ___ Poc|Cevifi€Lp3aAi«lc s /2SD _______ S‘^^o' *. -200 ^A.i-_ _____j 7107 f . *^7^>o >4 I 7 3 0") i:P. „ ._ „ fy«r7Ai<* 7X-Z ro 7 r-iro' /®!^<>oseo 1 - l^^►40^ir //4 P/€ii/^A^ -“ S.C.^U |VW*rfAJt-. g4»J3^» •“ Ai€T “ - . X2-4.(. ./d'lPfeUCTt6Ai . •73 S7 - XZ S TaaS" >f>"~ - 7^^ "T 70^ no pPaPmr^ I o**^L.. MAS X>tfrmAii4ie<^ *T«Af /CocM gi»tts UAift«*MfAi gy p8»no«4S f=34«t.\C- ^«CC RhC C*uc*4uvntti0..yvWVH3ii«X . . _ . _______ Drainage ?C#|. X • * 8CHOELL & IVIAQECII^i INC.£XW. < .>■ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FIEBELKORN POOL PROJECT 2730 SHAOYWOOO ROAD Drainage Concept: To mitigate the effect on storm runoff of the additional absorption Mater disposal system. Impervious Surface Area: Pool Spa Adjacent Patio 736 square feet 33 1040 1809 square feet Required Detention Storage Volume In Pool: Use SCS Method, 100 year frequency, 24 hour storm Detention Volume - 1809 square feet x 5.67 In, * 855 ft.12 In/ft Storage Volume Available Pool A Spa11 Inches freeboard (filter outlet to patio l«vel) Volume - 736 square feet • 33 square ft. x 11.1^ • 12 In/it* Assume flooding patio area (no overflow) Maximum depth on patio - 2 In., avg. depth Additional depth over pool Volume (patio) ■ 1040 s.f. x 11^12 In/ft - 1 In. 86 ft.p Volume (pool)736 s.f. X 2 In-IZ in/ft o 122 ft.V T •'! Total 883 ft. Fltwl design of soil absorption water disposal system will require soil borings and percolation tests to determine absorption rates. f ^ K vious surface t utilized as Into the soil 75 ft. S§11 Oorlngs ' ■F- :v:J,.::i:,' " . • 'F- • Ifv PI''*'- ' lil r / \ • ( , 1(T 5r V V ' *♦ ^ H r^/ ^ , - # i'x*^A: k ‘ A* ^♦ ,%\T ;\ v'\.■V . ^' y '." - *.•f* V k, ». - V.^ r 1 V*■ ^ V \V ' > K- Vf-- •■ •• f ^i'-‘V, '>'• ' •• • -M ; ‘r. A ^ "I :;* jir.vv •i.f >3^ b 7, ■; '.i. !' >" w . ^<7J V V!/ 'f i> w^ • * t k ^ L^ . ^ y -1 > // •*.>5j; t • 1 ' ^ WvV:#7 *n,-^ * i^V' •'■j^ r ^ ^V/ .‘s>7<'"'7 '>/ V W ; VA V w /9 . .T^ o a "■'*i ; .t‘ ■! f Tos Planni Orono City iFroa:Dates Jeann<Novem] Subjects #1355 Condll Zoning District Pertinent 0rdin4 Section 10. antenna st subordinati lot and Cl another st not exceed a distanc structure. List of Exhibit! Exhibit A • Exhibit B • Exhibit C * Exhibit D * Exhibit E * Exhibit P • Review of Appli< Mr. Hesse, structure to t construction, will be suppor* actual antenna structure measui controlled mec^ tree level 30* transmitting mo in height (rev property well 370*. The antei Hesse Is has cer existing trees adjacent proper the structure w: HesseIs ad operation of h: accessory use i been issued a installation of the City of Or f I 1 'J y ' • v'w% h.4 V \ ^-)i > ♦ y •••.. \'V m iTOfPlanning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson frcms Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building fit Zoning Administrator Dates Subject 3 November 15, 1988 #1355 Kenneth J. Wessels, 1245 Woodhill Avenue Conditional Use Permit ~ Public Hearing Zoning District ~ RR*'1B Pertinent Ordinance - ^ ^Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (M) - Antenna Structure - One independent antenna structure with antenna or combination of antenna thereto, subordinate to in servicing the principal use or structure on the same lot and customarily incidental thereto, that is not attached to another structure, provided the height of the antenna structure does not exceed 65' and the antenna structure is set back from any lot line a distance at least equal to the total height of the antenna structure. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Application Property Owners List Plat Map Addendum Specification Sh'sets Site Plan Review of Applicati< Mr. Wessels proposes the installation of an independant antenna structure to the northeast of his residence structure currently under construction. Per the enclosed spec sheets, review Exhibit E, the tower will be supported from a concrete base stub requiring no guy wires. The actual antenna structure is supported from this base on a triangular structure measuring 20" on all sides. The antenna structure itself will be controlled mechanically so when it is not in use it will be lowered to the tree level 30' to 35'. The tower will extend no higher than 60 when in transmitting mode. The antenna structure will not exceed the allowed 65* in height (review Exhibit P). The setbacks from the lot lines of the property well exceed the required 60' distance, ranging from a 165 to 370'. The antenna structure will not interfere with any power poles. Mr. Wessels has centrally located the antenna structure on the property. The existing trees around the house will provide additional screening for the adjacent property owners. The fact that guying will not be required for the structure will also minimize the visual impact of the antenna. Wessels advises that this is merely a hobby and is not relat^ to the operation of his business. The use of the antenna can be consldeied an accessory use and can not be installed until the principal structure has been issued a Certificate of Occupancy. It should be noted that the installation of the antenna structure will require a building permit from the City of Orono. n- ■■■■ k Ml Zoning File #1 November 15, 1 Page 2 of 3 In appro3 not discrimin< City issues b structures, welfare of tt zoning code wc a business us residential structure meet Commission fe safety that h< adjacent to * structure. Ai the visual Im applicant to such a structi prohibit the i Staff Rec< To approT for the prope installation based on the i 1. Prop< property 2. The adjacent 3. The I tree le residenti 4. A 1 specifics Approval 1. A bu antenna ; for the I 2. Per 8 ask that from ents 3. Appl serve th< antenna s I 1 4 L or • One independent intenna thereto# cture on the same not attached to a structure does rom any lot line of the antenna spendant antenna currently under ibit E# the tower 0 guy wires. The on a triangular re itself will be be lowered to the than 60' when in 1 the allowed 65' lot lines of the ng from a 165' to power poles. Mr. he property. The screening for the t be requircKi for antenna. ot related to the be eonsidired an al structure has noted that the Iding permit from \C •f'j Zoning Pile #1355 November 15# 1988 Page 2 of 3 In approximately 1985-86# the FCC ruled that local authorities could not discriminate between satellite dishes and antenna installations. The City issues building permits for satellite dishes considered accessory structures. Local authorities may regulate to insure the safety and welfare of the public. It appears that the standards set forth in our zoning code would deal with matters of public safety. It also assures that a buslnoss us© could not be made as it is a conditional use under residential zoning# considered accessory to the principal use. The structure meets the required setbacks for a 60* antenna. Does the Planning Commission feel that there are other considerations dealing with public safety that have not yet been addressed? Existing trees and the placement adjacent to the house will provide screening for the single antenna structure. Are there other conditions that should be considered regarding visual impact of the tower on the neighborhood? Staff has asked the applicant to confirm that the private covenants of this subdivision allow such a structure. Mr. Wessels has confirmed that the covenants would not prohibit the antenna structure. Staff Reo dation - To approve a conditional use permit application for Kenneth J. Wessels for the property located at 1245 Woodhill Avenue# that would permit the installation of a free standing# 60’ high antenna for a private/hobby use based on the following findings: 1. Proposed antenna structure meets the required setback from all property lines. 2. The visual impact of the antenna structure is lessened by the adjacent house structure and existing mature trees. 3. The antenna structure# while not in use# will be lowered to the tree levels# thereby lessening the impact upon the adjacent residential properties. 4. A licensed erojneer has certified structural soundness per specifications for installation of the free-standing antenna. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit will be issued for the installation of the antenna structure upon the City's issuing a Certificate of Occupancy for the principal residence. 2, Per specification Sheets submitted with application# the City will ask that anti-climb sections be installed to prevent other persons from entering the property and climbing the 60' structure. 3. Applicant is advised that when planning for the utilities to serve the residence# the utilities be installed away from the proposed antenna site. .A:_ _ _ r •t J : . Zoning Fils November IS Page 3 of 3 4. Tt inspe safe f f ■■■i h -m I authorities could nsta nations. The sidered accessory e the safety and set forth in our also assures that lal use under the ncipal use. The Does the Planning aling with public and the placement e single antenna nsidered regarding :aff has asked the subdivision allow tvenants would not Kenneth J. HesseIs would permit the private/hobby use setback from all s lessened by the be lowered to the pon the adjacent al soundnesi per r antenna. itallation of the icate of Occupancy :ion» the City will rent other peraoni zcture. the utilities to y from the proposed Zoning Pile #1355 November 15» 1988 Page 3 of 3 4. The City would recommend that the iMp.ctioni of the antenna structure to insure that it remains in a safe condition. CITYPROPSite Prop Plea Plea on 1 ride for regulair it remains 111 a I v-t 1^■v: :MM- * I ■ ■ -I - ^ i >• :am i,v'l ,r; •f i’- ■ ■'■ CITY OF OnOHO - GK >PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^'s g «cX ^ ^ f'I O O- ^■ «k «•> mt tm m <mii-i-• * t * * } r- - w • ^ , i. V V i ^ 9 0^6)aJO . ; •• Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)1 Please check one - Property x abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only) torreiis? * *» -«• -• Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ^ APPLICANT Name A^a J£FU v/Tk/£^^ Phone (home) Address u.i/ QMIIBR (if different than applicant) ♦ Phone (work) City -Zip Name Phone (home) Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired yUAllir (month/year) I ^td<Cr (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PEES - CONDITIONAL OSB PERMITS > Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Pee $100.00 a)Residential accessory Use $150.00 b)Institutional (church, school. $150.00 C) • Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d)Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) e Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland c floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within of lakeshore PRD/PID " see fee schedule APPLICATIONS $150.00 ■ $250.00 $150.00 ” $ 50.00 " $250.00 _ _ _ $100V00 _ _ other - Commercial Sit# Plan Review (■♦ consultant C##s) Vacation Basement Vacation Basement Vacation With Subdivision! Rezoning Appeals see fee schedule d i*- . ss ■■■'yv-' ' aMW: *: '■ ; i'f * "-v : i -. m: f,:-> •i ■*i. ■ V ...4 ^m:' I V, PRBS1D1 Th«> a] rememk not be APPLIC The a requei unusua the i] knowle ^plic OHHERS The o«i author agent invest Owner Appiic Planni third review unable authoi office * » 1 4. 5. 6. 7. 6. m OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning Oistrict I i3^.1 r• 4^♦ I r « • 4 Present Use of Property /4»»t/W - ResidentialtL)Eother (specify) DBSCRIPTIOM OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed A’^plication Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmer Center 346-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of th6 natti on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if I’.ad alterations involve changes in elevation (grades), Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. DateZoning Officials Signature APPLICART*S SIGEATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date ^ OHHBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby aclcnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date ^ tfr" Applicant must have all submittals ^nto the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangments to have an authorised agent attend in your place and advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■Vi 41 r* :Wm- <■ ^ • .. ■ ,,, ^ 5? •-s •J-••■ja Ko m Sd§ S| 1^ 9B l^l ii-g" M g (0• J{ 1^ M (0 S M ^ K e C s M S i 3 9 8 5 s M -i >• U m “SB»8am mi I 3§iiU 0 M wm md mi siiiSi m tilt rise^m< in m » H ^M _ S H e in o or-« M M in Nm>>*^>-A ^ < vn < ^ o o o •-< 3K tl i m M m MI::8g sg il iO O 5? gg“ P5 lAl 44 X in m Q X ;^i( u M I X K w i|8 £S < •»aalllli llsl tilt M s K bO O OL < O <W 2 Min#iXo>- 9 P ^ ^ Sin e p p in X in Q < -> saassSa P s si m 8 «M tt S 1^II. 3 p m Z ftI p tt _ BS 4» P I M O << i!issassa 1 Ul ca «J M Kl X 4J 41 .4 «i sp ne p I; csi Q X X qI B u u H n* Q H* H -I «>« S M M M 5i Ss M U U X o in e -i «i m p p in p q e S e 3 P 8^ P O Mls < 'w e ^ ft Mi B Mi Ml O P SS3S iS m P P P V 8 < < K 5 M M ly z=*8S3| «sS8“5»um P 8 fm PO Mi P > <# «i CM ^ N y«5, ftS^Bi pH N P P P X W H* H* ^ iCM O HI UJ H* in o M Ml P «i« m p OOP P9 ■= ■*- g «M SSio< ^ ■# ^ m S Ml Mi H K P ml P P K p^«<mi3 IM Z X P ^ m Mi I I Mi !t;l P . j.-mm 4 m ■v.;h /iarMi :• ^ J I • -'/ cm OF PROPERT Site Ad< Propert Please (ft Please on requ APPLICA Na Ad OMiiBR ( Na Ad Da I PBIS - R€ Ai m,m QTE I i ^ ^ ' ■ ■ ■ -•Oil.Mill i.'j.*T* CITY OF OROMO - GH PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Q ^ . Pts ■' • . - • ^ . H. V / A 4- U ■••»••• ♦ ••• • ♦ r •' .: . •» w k • « • u‘ V '• f ! ^ji /IX!U/SSKSS>0/^K)AJd .V ^ I • r r »/ V - V w • ; . Jw • i i mm v\ fc %. < Property Identification Number (P.I.D.>... >m-*_ .. .«# • r f. U 5 ' Please check one “ Property _ abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only) torrehs? ■ • f ' ? ' . fa ^ ; vv' - •* • V Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. __________________ Phone (home) ? ^APPLICANT Name Phone (work) 3 -/^/ Address 2^-./ _ _-- ONNBR (if different than applicant) Phone (home) . .. ,„ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ PhO*'® - -- - - - - - - - --Name Address City Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PBBS - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - Renewal Pee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee $100.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) $200.00 f) d) Commercial/Industrial Use f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland o floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Gradingr seawall# retaining walls within of lakeshore PRD/PID « see fee schedule R APPLICATIONS $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $1004.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Basement Vacation Basement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals Other *- see fee schedule #■ . ’'i-t E'. 5***: . ■fc;i i!4 n 1 V ■' wm..- I m I PRBSBNl Pr dbscrii DC RE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 • 7. 8. HR] C( c t c s o C T a c p A a The a] rememl: not be Certii Zoninc APPLK The a reque unusuj the i knowl< Appli Owner Appli Plann thirc revie unabl authc offic l»^ ' < PRBSBNT OSB OP PROPERTY P]^0S6n^ Zonxn^ District • t t ^• f.*la2 W '■-•ft r /e.^ I f3^h ^ ■■ *ji Present Use of Property fy?" description of rbqobst Describe request in detail: jh^r<^eS) A^O/ pwn SODHITTALS Certifi^^rop^ owners within 350* (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmer StSmpedf^lUl”’ sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the name on the above list with no return address. cins“ic?iln plan, if ap|licable (see staff for requirements). “‘’;n‘‘2ddendu« to this application, please »ttac*. a sep,^ ii,t of any other persons you wish notified of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ As an not been included. ____ _ _____ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _—- Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature -- - --- - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S ^NATTO provide all information required orThe applicant hereby agrees to provxae^^ and/or requested by in review of this application,^and certifies that ™nfor^:Sirn ^"up"p“!ed'"is" true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge Applicant's signature Date 0NNBR8 SIGNATURE The owner h«V^v acknowledges and agrees to this application and further , , • Date I Qc£j^owner's signature ;p;u7a;;:;;;r;7vVruV;fmTtt^^ Pl'anning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission """'-‘“v- --- - y-,, third Monday of each month. °*“*j Council ” If an applicant isreview meetings of the Planning Coiraission and Council, if__ PP unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to *>ave^an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building » Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ,.r- : % ii U4 lAJ U E ^ z0 o SI < !:i:s M o S ms^ssis . u M M O Q Q K SSI C Q O >SiiSS >► \ ■ ' A.. wmsm •’mmmmiSSKk Mhii asmwmsi:« ial y)- ■T- ;hin 350* (you can obtai inance A-603 Governmar ssed to aach of the name d condors) if land ,1). ^o) ‘ raquiramants). :ach a separata list of lication. application. Please • above information has lication is complete. Date ormation required or pay all fees and/or Lon, and certifies that the best of his/her Date iplication and further .ty staff# consultants# ers for purposes of Date L css 25 days before the tines are held on the (snt at all scheduled 1. If an applicant is xanqements to have an h. Bulldlna ‘ »onlBg I:?. '5?J t-t. 14’ s Slil M M X M 91 < lA . Ill J£ O 3_ ej U» S ro >- i m «» O 8 § 5 Ai «j >• u m I 5 O Z «J ^ 5 u 0 M 2 #g MM H ;3o >» S3 lA M I III 01 10 -i 28ri, I M lA O O ^ < S552S ^ O O o S S K» lA lA W 8 §1 "5 M tt M O Kl Q•y 2 •2gt®s ii(ss:ba.8 8 SS O < ..J •2? Sg “ Ul lU 8^ lA Q i i 2 Jgggg,t;gof »_S I M • £i_ « lU lU ftmii M §2 S U.8 8 ^ Q SSIS S lA M lA cy N if lA^ 10 *8“-|*S ^ ft* m X o ^ « o _ UJ CM < lA o 0 0 lA 3 4 : or M□ lU Ul O Ch SS22SIS ^ ^ M M X Ul F* 8sg|8Snum s “5 S8 SgS I O fifc ^:glt T :? «y FIo ^ _ O fi i) lA Ul .8- < o o» £9S *§! |8S W CM ^ M Ul Sdjjg" M -I -J lA X Ui lAJ Xri|g§5 ^ M M M III 4* «l fA cy -I to M CO CO lA FI X HI Ul K cy I h. H H- CO t183! cy M Ul H ssiiSi lA «0 SS!e < ^ -I cy «J M Ul 5 M M M Ul O Kl X Ul M M <r cy Q M Ul M Ul I Q O M U» «A tv» Qg I «yo o se M Ul 2 ^^ cy o 2 ^ -I$ Ul lA M O 2S Ms si;: \ 35'o fi I I ey SS!o < 4> «l «y «i M CO CO »A X Ui Ui M cy IN lA S h- M CO M M Ul 2T ml cy CO CO K o Ul< < Ul < ssiiSi I Ial >• \ OK < ^ Olh* I I # r-*. V- .•4; i •■V ■ m ^;?r * :-iA i-1. m if[ir'i~- ^niwi ■I •V. #j-■ . ••■'/ iMm M ■ *-i 4 9 s si Ul 01 s sy Ul m^ ZZ 5i 2 op T ^1 C\ ^ < lU W M<n £ O H K^g>.3 - IL,5“ Ml O 9 Z UJ 5S£8 M Ml H Ml gg ■ >- ^ • r ^ft \ .Ut*i)r f »;,i,;rr<"V-' /s. 4*^ 4£^)cf^r cu /p V^s T' aJ^o^/v/^ >5^ xfyv/ 7Z^€>^ ^0 7" TV XAr^iiMVo Sfkr'y /t€^c7^ /Xj iu/2^ /c^^u^y c>z^Ajt^s. />- ^/cjo^i^AJr ^/J 7TA^ <f>^uA/r>^ '§B& /Uf^aA /h% Aicir" T^<> ^ Cvo^ytXjOjJ ^O %cA^/T^^'7AJ^-y / 77Ji£^ yi/CfAi Ir ^ ‘' -A^oy - p/Lj^yr^j^ yp^M- y^ <20tv//>^*^ Th^ Cf>^^ /-^ y y^y jfny^T/7'cy^y^ aj/^T2U^4^u>^ /^C^y/-^, ^yTpfr/^ycy^ AT^ycy/. ) " 4 SHEET 0-1765 (Replaces 0 1. Two U-bolt the slotte See Drawin 2. Run the U- washers on 3. To install lower U-bo 4. Adjustment The H8X - Heav from a pipe fl hardware consi above, if requ BREAKING DOWN 1. If your to washers. 2. Lay the bu smallest s tower sect 3. Inspect al handling, tightened. TOWER After you have concrete base. Instructions. 1. The legs o .previous 1 sectim an rivet stop by bolting 2. To erect t the sectlo weight of hinged up 3. Loose, mis local hard NOT!: 3/8* bo and'all sectlo OfMS set of CTO Installing the most all makes There is a sho the mast clamp on the HOil to For the h8X - I.O. larger th mast to turn 1< iFOR INSTALLING Some lall.^ m} is doi».) *he Mit the lower «id into the n EV3 n^ /v/«^ 4r^ ^ / />*. •/ VSHEET 0-1765(Replaces 0-1508):1 ‘.’1V4»f 0ARCO-ROH <1^August 1, 1980 MAST ASSEMBLY BX - STANOARO // HBX - HEAVY DUTY // HOBX - EXTRA HEAVY DUTY TOWERS 1 Two U-bolt assemblies with "L" brackets are supplied for Installing the mast. These "L“ brackets are bolted through the slotted holes on the rotor and top plate with the short legs of the "L" bracket toward the outside of the tower. See Orawing C-750429. 2. Run the U-bolt through the open side of the formed "V" clamp and into the "L" bracket placing the 5/16" nuts and washers on the U-bolt loosely. 3. To Install the mast, place one end of It through the upper U-bolt assembly end plate and slide It down into the lower U-bolt assembly. Then tighten the U-bolt assembly to hold the mast. 4. Adjustments to make the mast vertical may be made by moving the "L" brackets In the slotted holes. The HBX - Heavy Duty and HOBX - Extra Heavy Duty Towers are furnished with a mast clang) Installed on the top plate aade from a pipe floor flange, which Is provided with three bolts to be used as set screws to secure the mast. The bo* of hardware consists of one U-bolt assembly as described above and It can be Installed on the lower plate as 1$ Instructed above. If required. ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS BREAKING DOHW BUNDLE 1.If your tower Includes the 8* mast and/or three 4* base stubs, remove them. Remove the package of nuts, bolts, and washers. 2.Lay the bundle on Its side and remove the tower sections. Start with the Innermost section of the package (the smallest section) and remove by pulling out with quick, firm jerks. It is not necessary nor desirable to pry the tower sections out with tools as damage may result. 3.Inspect all tower sections on delivery to make sure there are no loose or broken rivets caused by transport mis handling. If a rivet Is broken or loose. It should be replaced by a snug-fitting machine bolt and nut, securely tightened. TOWER After you have chosen the desired type of base for your tower (concrete base with 8X6 concre^base concrete base, or BXC\ cylinder base which hinges over and requires no concrete) and It Is oro^rly Installed per base instructions, bolt the base section (the largest section) to the base. Proceed with the erection as follows: I by bolting together each section with the proper size bolts. To erect the tower, section by section vertically, you should use an EFBX erect.on flxtuw for J'AlsIng the section being Installed into the previous section. (Note: Do not use an erection fixture to lut more than the weight of one tower section at a time.) By using BXHC or BXCA base the tower can be assembled on the ground and hinged up using extreme caution. When hinging up. watch for power lines, trees, etc. 3. Loose, missing or faulty rivets should be replaced with a similar size nut and bolt which can be obtained at any local hardware store. NOTE; 3/8" bolts are to be used on BXl, BX2 and the tep of BX3 sections. 9/16" bolts are used on the bottom of the 6X2 and all sections from BX4 through BX8 (BX8 Is the largest section).* One set of cross braces on one face of the too section 1$ purposely left off to allow easy wcess to the rotor elate for Installing the mast and rotor. (Note: Only one person should be on the tower at one time.) NOTES ON installing BCTATCRS Most all makes of rotators can be Installed on the rotor plate inside tne top tower J* ^itrilth There is a short piece of tubing furnished with each tower that can be used as a (fo^J ^ the mast clmm) installed on the top plate as Is described under the heading of Mast Assembly. Oo not Install rotators on the HOBX top plate.. for the HBX - Heavy Duty and HOBX - Extra Heavy Duty Towers, when a rotator is used a ^ piece Of or Pl^ I.O. larger than the 0.0. of the mast can be Installed in the pipe flange clamp and used as a bearing sleeve for mast to turn in. FOR installing the ROTATOR ITSELF. FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED BELOW: Sow. inline model rotators mount directly to the rotor plate. (The lower housing of tim rotator Is "O* 4« dnim 1 'he necessary holes For mounting most rotors are pre-Ounched In the olate Itself snd theis done.) ne '’•cessary mji«« « .. . . . . . . from the bottom of the plate upward\ holts ^Or mouniinq prwyuru.neu m s/i**.* - Z ^ ^ i « _ IliJ ?!: i™ to the upper housing (4.1/a- * r bolts) are to be inserted from the bottom of the plate upward ® ?t It desirable to place J/B" nuts to act as spacers between the rotor plate and the rotator.and into tne rotor. SHEE(Thes of t for outs dire Also roto stal It 1980 i thrtW9ti it« toMcr. 4tt Mtfe boi of ttractod Iti, 8Rd (tlM rj th« SHEET 0-1T66(Replaces -1343)August 1, 19808ThM,m mit« -ni orevent the terminals of the rotator and the rotor wire from shorting on the rotor plate. An 8" piece s‘54;,52.75Sc?i53: Also, some rotators mount beneath the rotor plate (as pictured). It will be necessary to {!l* rotor plate to 3/8" holes to use the 3/8" bolts furnished with these rotators. See pictorial views )f typical rotor in stallations: cnowiw *:4^. CPOWN AOTOn HV'OAIM 400 In all cases be careful during installation. EX SERIES TOWER the EX Series Tower is made up from a basic package of one BXIA section and one BX2 section. TO «M .0 «X3. EX4, or £X5 toror. .tr.tsot >«;t<0« to to. 6X1 (BXSl) .oO 6X6 (BXS2) Ol-Mloos « lntm.06*) the standard sections. The part number indicates the number of 8' sections within that particular P^kage. (^le: W2 is t^8‘ *«ct1ons necessitating guying. s s.»r«'sjrr'itiis;» “"llsSSplace with the aid of a screw driver as the two sections are of the same dimensions. sst'rroJr Instructions for BX Tower.sssi. SiJ'isa.-ssT.ris r=: rir^ss.,” •s.ariJr.ri.-iS” Strength. MOTES FOR BX AMO EX SERIES TOWER . . . 60 00. lo.t.11 -o-r, n..r oo.«- llo... «I1 to«r. .««|16 <>' every electrical and t.leptwwte wire should be considered dangerous. Unarco-Rohn reco—nds anti-climb secti«s on all towrs to prevent unauthorized persons fro- climbinf t«fS. All antenna installations must be grouned per local or national codes. All towers should be installed by e*perieticed and trained personnel. reieeried with hazard and warning labels to insure safety and proper performance. f y. ■. SHEET 0-1513 (New Sheet) 1, 2. Assemble th Place the c position th are no obst the cyIInde 3.Dig a hole I eveI). 4.Drop the cy back Into t of fill. ( Drawing C75 5.When the cy section to necessary t the soli Ir 6.Continue tc top. 7.Plumb the f to the plurr brackets ur tfaht when 8.Remove the the pipe si pivot dlrec 9.Assemble t^ up and wher pipe sleevE 10. 11. Complete fi After Inst? to be sure months. 12. Towers Insi NOTES . • . • • Do not Insta11 i fal1Ing dI stance considered dange Unarco-Rohn recc persons from cM All antenna ins All towers shou A11 types of an personnel at lei sure safety and August 1» 1980lUct. An 8* pine*< brtcktts furnished r ssscffidly (to f«ct esn tM Mountod h« 1/4* holts In tho of typteol rotor IR'^ e iBtdrpQSdd btMon Is two 8‘ sections D tower. on« 8* • AM»«xtMteiy 4* of frow shiftind «nt11 home brsdeet ■^•ciet wltlRHit taracket Is foTMid m 0 flat reef. p«rt of the roar t a pretectlni to d ltd slid Into to for InsUllInf tAii InstntetiOM, foltw nert twit thrmidhi Its ta snlMi itaes tlace 01^ toitrf: ^*<0 a iHI n> a" i li- !k; SHEET 0-1513 (New Sheet)April 1, 19/9UNARCO-ROHN INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS BX SELF-SUPPORTING CYLINDER BASES 1, Assemble the base as shown on Drawing C750409. 2 Place the cylinder In the area the tower is to occupy. (Note: Be sure to position the base so that the tower can be hinged In the direction where there are no obstructions.) Mark off a circle approximately 2 to 3 Inches larger than the cyIInder. 3. Dig a hole 4 feet deep (deep enough to completely bury the cylinder below ground I eve I). 4 Drop the cylinder In the hole and with It as yertical as possible throw the soil back Into the cylinder and around it, tamping It solid after every 6 to 8 Inches of fill. (Note: Be sure cylinder Is flush or below the ground surface. See Draw Ing C750409.) 5. When the cylinder Is approximately one-half full of dirt, attach the base twer section to the pipe sleeves of the base as shown on Drawing C750409 This Is necessary to avoid distortion of the cylinder as you continue to fill and tamp the soil In the base. 6. Continue to fill and tamp the soil into the cylinder to within 6 Inches of the top. 7. Plumb the tower section by placing a level on the outside of each leg adjusting to the plumb position by loosening and re-aligning the BXC31 angle brackets until the tower Is plumb. (Note: The brackets must be extremely tight when the tower section Is plumb.) Remove the top 1/2” x 3-1/2" bolts on the pivot side of the tower that the pipe sleeves to the yokes. Then remove both bolts on the side opposite the pivot direction. The section can now be hinged to the ground. Assemble the rest 6f the tower as per BX tower Instructions. Hinge the tower up and when vertical put the 1/2" x 3-1/2" bolts back through the yokes and pipe sleeves. Then tighten all base bolts securely. 10. Complete filling the cylinder with dirt and tamp firmly. 11 After Installation Is completed, the base should be rechccked In about 30 days t7be surethat the hardware r«;alns tight and It should be rechecked every six months. 12. Towers Installed In sand or gravel should be guyed or bracketed. NOTES . . Do not Install towers near power Unas. All towers should he Installed °“T oT falling distance of power lines since every electrical and teleohone wire should be considered dangerous. Unarco-Rohn recomands antl-cIImb s^tlons on all towers to prevent unauthorized persons from climbing towers. All antenna Installations must be grounded per local or national codes. All towers should be Installed by experienced and trained personnel. All types of antenna installations should be Thorougnly Inspect^ by , personnel at least twice a year and remarked with hazard and warning labels to In sure safety and proper performance. 8. 9. April 1, 1979 Be sure to Ion where there ches larger than \der below ground I e throw the so ?I sry 6 to 8 Inches surface. See T the base tower 0409. This Is 5 f 111 and tamp S Inches of the ch leg adjusting gle support e extremely er that holds Ide opposite the I Inge the tower he yokes and n ahdut 30 days becked every six lei out of wire snould be tffteythor I zed f auelifted I labels to In- m l>^ i o <0SJ1?■kl 11\»s 1 V > It Si k4 5 s ii 3 i i1 !! v'»i f I i 1 }.nii■1j1: ?'i ‘ 1 Sli ‘ii,lii I 'll I ill' >ll. jrMj Oi§ I M I Hi 4 1^ 1*^r ct -t <tI ^ O N n % • % 's *v %• ^l %« <Vl > lo. V » •> N t *K •Vi % • ^ • # O ♦« > 5 H » » %l J ^ 1‘^Kh •% N V V % I f % INI ^11V! ^ 15: ^' <; 5: ^ (| V ‘ i ( ^» 1 1 : > '•j i i 1'.■:-r^W \5 i«- $ i^^ |i; ihi'ti m i!i I R ^ ^ 5ji 2 P r" ? ''j c 5 'y 0 > r* ^ X C i ^ V *000^ *-----------------------^-- % V - ’ - Jk^ t -I------- 1 1 f / '4 ., . 1.. .." ■ ", ;i. ... ..H-‘ >•<»•• •V. •■'•V'•::••«/jiX * * *.’ . * *^v * ^ *•••.* 2 •.•* ■•»■*/ 1 1 i 4 » O % « ' X N «i • "1 « 1 X • % • V t % • % N« . 1 X %>O >s*1 X N "S •s ¥ t S % » t «.• t «> >>>>> V t %• N» t % • N %« N « % • N V K • • N Ln N V %t>• % 1 t % <•V%• X«>• »*•*•s >>>V| § >s VA Vi K i"-: I£“K' W^- m awiia^ r' .... .. T’M/S 77)H TTi TAaSjT /^ ^r- xSsCT/OA^ D/JT,4f/Cl 14^///^ OA^ h4A//> OA/ 7oT/fi 144 S//S/4A ( A4 oM£'A/7' 14^. ^ / Zsc S£cr/oA/ 7oTy4£ l4 i$//£A9£ C COS <P ^Lojao £a mm Typ/c/iL TotyS/e /}n/u ys/j Toiv£‘/^ 0£’<5/g// IV/ND P^sjsi/je^" ’ /^/V72WW — 20 /^AfT£MAfy95 /f j^fOM/TA/r ptf£^ 7b jv/A/P Afi/sr A/or ^ T"M/s rotty^x, Aa/txa/uas sa/o(ao pat j/m/ttp TSt rpOjr ASAU/AA^ A /UAf</MPM POOAf ASAACTTA € sb,/^ AT 3 aso!/£ T0HAP2 TOP - ^/A/, Z/A/X" /^at£aaa AAr. = SO^As. /,/A/£ iVT = O.Sigs./PT. ^£CT/OA/ Afe.9 7 6 S 4 3 1 2 7 D/£TAAC£ PAOM top (PT)E/.7 S3.7 ^.0 38.3 30.7 23.0 /S.3 7.7 \ 147///P OA/ SsCT/OAA Uss.)/7f-7 /6/.7 7S0.0 739.3 773.3 707.7 70/.7 96.0 1 MaAP OA A^AT£APA ///A£ Ciss^SS S.3 3:3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 /274 Totai M/aad oa Ssct/oa ass.)/SS.2 /67.0 733.3 744.8 720.8 773.0 706^223.4 Sa£AA ups.)/2/S.J /030.7 863.7 708.4 363,6 44J.3 329.8 223.4 Momsat CPT-ALSS. )37^770^S790 27,330 7S;300 70,620 67?D 3870 7640 /aC£ I4//PTA ^PT)2.ZSS 2.P47 7.824 7.602 -7.387 7.786 1 .989 .794 ,SC^ /AC£ py/PTA CPT)/.vs /.723 7.380 7.388 7.796 7.023 .336 .688 l£C /pap AASS.) ^ -/9,/PO /3,240 73,630 //,/70 8880 6600 4430 2460 S£cr/cA ^/£MT ass.)32 7S 64 37 4/28 23 22 Tptai 14/e/cat uss.)A7C 390 372 244 787 736 704 77 /pap AAA tv JV£/£Mr ass.)79,260 76,370 73,730 /7,230 8940 66SO 4490 2480 Ja£AP 0A£ pace CASS.) ^3/S 697 379 473 378 297 22/ /SO cos <fi .904 .883 .863 .827 .783 .733 .667 .380 ^/OAP £ACM SPACE CASS.)^4S/397 337 287 247 203 76C 729 0 Imp loAP =Moment ,d£€ ^ /ACS IV/^TA (D SA£A2 OAS PACS = . ^7 ^ ^A£AX Q) /cap £aCM SPACS s 5a£AX oaas AAC£ 2 A. CCS p ^^£P£2 7b Dt¥£. A'o.S^74C0^EOP A^^i^ASLS lOAPS op M£MS£XS / CPA/A/£Cr/QMS. DhaC. //i’ 7E0W/4L f •■ i’.i ■r^.- ..... W./i .S' II? A . ••' JVOM/. //£/£, A7 4 # 1/-f/S . ASoy£ TA/£ <7* /7o7’£' a Tpoj£ \ % ^ -f Model SX 7bi»u£/? ^LL0I4'/ISL£‘ /J/V7EA//VA lo/JDS * WmO Fk£SSUJZ£ - 20£J£ (70.7mj>m) * Th/S 10/10 (ZaH S£" /ippi/£0 //T ^ Po/ht 3ft. PSO/£ TP£ /^P£X OP 7FS 70/4/£yt /H PP/f/TToy T& 77/£ O/PW /4//A/0 PP£SSC/P£ PCT/A/S OH TM£" 7l7t4/£X. No T£: /^A/ T£HHA TXP£J £MO(/LO S£ 2/M/r£D 77> TM0J£ HP//HC p MP^/AJe/u aoojH ishotp op /Opt. No M/HAL Np/c/rr, PT. COHff/A/PT/OH op IbiHs/c Spct/ohs M>. 4p£/t, Sq.Pt: 7ppc/5Z JlSS. 3X -hZ-3 BX 24 (a /20 24 SX-Z-3-4 HBX 24-240 SX-3-4-S BBBX 24 20 400 3X-/-3-3-4 BX 32 a /20 32 SX-3-3-4-S 4BX 32 /Z 240 1 3X-3-4-S’-6 HBBX 32 Id 360 ;3X-/-3-3-4-S'BX 40 G /2/0 ; 40 SX-2-3-4-S-6 a ax 40 JO 200 HOBX 40 J3 3GO 3X-'-2-3-4-S-6 BX 43 G J20 43 eX-2~3-4-f-6-7 NSX 48 /O 200 SX-3-4-S-£-7-3 BOSK 46 JS 3GO SX-/-2~3-4-4--e-7 BX S6 G /20 3X-2-3-4-S~6-7-a MSX S6 JO 200 G4 BX 64 G /20 Dhra. Ah. /- 76000/ o\r-4 U di JOk §ua. 11 r.JiSS. /£0 240 4CO /20 240 S40 /20 200 340 /20 200 340 /20 200 /20 I. A- 76000f EF-BX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 IEX-Rl 1 1 1 BX-SM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BX-HC-78 1 1 1 1 1 1 BX-HC-36 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BX-CHK*I 1 1 1 *Supplied with all Cylinder Bases BX-CA6 1 BX-CA5 1 BX-CA4 1 BX-CA3 1 BXB-8 1 !I BXB-7 1 1 1 BXB-6 1 1 1 BXB-5 1 1 i BXB-4 1 1 BXB-3 1 EX-H2 X X EX-Hl X X EXDR-1 X X X X EX-Bl X X X X M-8 X X X X X X X X X X FL X X X X X X X X X BX-8 X X X BX-7 X X X X X BX-6 X X X X X X X X X BX-5 X X X X X X X X X X X X BX-4 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X BX-3A X X X X BX-3 X X X X X X X X X X X BXS-2 X X X BX-2A X X X X X 1 BX-2 X X X X X X X X X X BXS-1 X X X BX-U X X X X X X X X X X TOWER MODELCM CMcn o Xac 00 • i vO in <r VO <r CM ( CMm O ' X2 GO ’ <r 1 ^om n iCM ( CM <m ^ X 00a 0 < <r ' 1 i 1 1 QO<r CM cn < X <r ' > i Arcs ; Le(7 S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I r Bases X X K X H X X X K X X X X X X X X X X n X X X X X n X ! X X «s IT > Sik c 1 kTS Mod£l BX 15ip's/; Des/ca/ /fssaM/^/oMS *»ToM/'SJ? A//9T£J^//9^ S/^XTC/^/C^T/CA/S » /^ST4/f CZey^if£ C Srxr^z (/w/a//a/(/m y/sx/? po///r - ^OOOys/) CS^iy/9///ssD /tcco^D//^ 76 /^JTA/ /^^S2S) 3j^/iars' Co^z> C“/0/7 (/%//a//a/£xm y/sxz> y^a/A/r’' 36,000/v/) C^/^zy^/z/zr^ ,^7CCo^^//zc tz) /6STM j4‘S2S) Zfg* S/>i/c£‘ SoxTB ' Sx^xf xP/yxrrs• 20/7- 7^ Azx/j^f/Wxtz /7zzoy lbyz£2 M6MSS2 x^zzoyx/fSLS’ D^'s/ot/ Sresss^s: Not£ ' Axuoxv/^szjf sresss£s sxszbm/ S££a/ /A/cez>9sxr^ sy 33-i Axe 73SST MZ///£ ZOA£ eoAX^/T/OA/P (S)CoMAe£S5/cxz^($rje£ss y/^£/£S ^ccaxe£//z£ t2> sz£/x^xrjeA/xtss £yt7va/^ 3e>9xe///o-------726^ COO />sx ® Sx/£>9xz— 774,000 ® 3£ZfC£S- CcMyeess/ox/’- (sryrss y,^£/£S /xcco^oxaxc tio 31£ax££2xz£ss 2>tr/or^ B&9je/AfC--------ZOO, 300/v^ S££>^xe /9,S30 /^/ 29,300/>sx Ctm££X9£S £xczu^^ Aeo/f 3xzxr>$a Ayawe)0 5xx£j^xe /3,/20 £5/ BxTAxexx^S3,400y!sx 039xe.3J»2J o£ x4.JZ,S.Z. '*Byxtc/£/cxaT/OA/ yo/e rw£ ^ys/CA/ o£ foaAf£Z> 67X7TC ST£i/C7‘C»^X J^eAZaiXJ, 7963 Zf/r/OAZ, 93.Z,S.C. A24a7u^x oax Srsez CoA/sKeyC7yoA/,7^2b/r/oA/,xfs.S.09f336, (3 4.S.3 /4.T,S.T. 6>£c/£/c/97yo/xs, /f63Zb/t/c/z. 04.Z.S.C. Af/9Axe/z9i. ey: Syxrxrz CxA/sryt/cT/aA/, 772Z7/7-/ciaz, 3r,31£4> /79xe> 4.S.4 o£ x4,Z»S.Z. Sysc/yyc4T/oxzs, 7963£x7/t/o/z. ® /4z(/M/Axt/M Co*^AT2ycr/ox/ A4^/zcx>xi, Sysc/y/oarxox/s Axe /7ztxM/A/yAe Sr^yertxjersl 7967 £^/770a/. ybn7££ S77/9££ />9CTOx2S •* ZxXD/y/Ot/X$Z M£M3££S U£CS, OMCTS, 7£,^AXSAfXSJ/OA/ Z/A/£S) ♦ Sax/ays FycToxe • 7.00 Ay £xy>r £Z£M£mts .67 Az cyxx//yy/c4z £x£A/£Axt3 TOfy££ <S£Cr/0/sx'. S//Ay£ F/aercM; 7.S0 77Af£j ttxt yeoj£cr£o /%esA oy XA/yxk/C*y4l M£MS£J7S MX OXX£ AeC£. Dtzc. 77f^ 79- Tfooor • • » « .* • W^PJ- - ■ !►:’1 It. :■ ■• :X: • ■ 1 I I I M ^ • ilJ I J 1 ♦ I S' 53 Q :| /fSTJ/ /f-SZr) 1/^rr- J£,000/v/) /fSTM /f-S2S) 'A/ A¥Oe£>9S£»a> 0 fSSS ^ATJO, fSi4M 0 Qg'S/CA/ Cl^ '^S£tS* /ftt9 ^/750V. V04<^ CK'y £^/r/oA/. £Jt o^ arr. 4-7S1000r i I a«I 15 5J cj RI I II I O g V* V««1•3••X X3•1 §?3••1s?1%3• %%§ ••1•1 3f 1 %•1• iv 31 1 t•g •1• » »>• 5'“*fs 5•1 1• N 1 1 R 35 'N• 1 X• 5S •N •» Vs• 3 • 6^1 J • N«• 35 %• 5R 1« 1 V s N 35 N X Ns X X X X ^1•1 s 1 X ? X 1 X 1 X N !? N N 1 N N 1 N "S >s *<5 ^S X X K 1 X i X 1 X X X g X 1 X 'VP ^$1•« 1 1••1 1 t ^5 •V »r <») t 5 > 5 *?5 'D 5 N 1 ? b> II Iv> f'y'o I I II I ^ 3i »S 31 h t l>3[ K I N 5 s K N. :t 3 St I Si I $ 3 N 5 § 3 5I S 3 K.o Si 3; 5 ^ 'C 3( •« 31 Vi I! 31 1 Jq 1 q i (5 i5 }q Ip ! "3 Ip s !I 5 5 5S ^ I ^ IQ )ao I 1 ma % I fs Ci rv w >c .H e;5 1 )5V? ^s >??<4 i«<^i $5* § f«« >:i 5! ist Si 1 St 15 fx •4 > X §!q U Ks 5s 5!i5 3i V*'n 5 >♦'li IPs 2< '4 X N Vj 2t S S3 X 5i <« §ti 55 55 5} Jt ift •Vi 5|<« 5J :si St !q 3t 3ft S$ Sj 5{ ?? sj ^3: ^i:?3(3Si S) K X X N si*'.3s*••3 3i•X X 1 X 5 X b JJ Vi X sx> I ^l I ^ ^ !o. «> Nftftk>i s k !< 9s ft » k i k N j ;s! 5 ft ft •k R3 ftV ft 1^a ft < 1 ft 1 a k i 1 1 k 1 y N 1 ?ft k 1 k 1 5 31i1 ft 1 us !i1 ^'! t 1\ <1 ? 1 ft !i -cj ! -i k ■% ' [ , fe.v: '1 ■y JT^J ■ ;■' fS m¥^ r1 m •^:i |> u i5 “5 I s tl u s3^II§ U '5fS"44 >4 V sI I 1 *» Xl5*-V 5KU *so A Ms(^<5 ^ II .Ji <5^Ib S I I ^ ’5 ^ ^ |4'^ ^ li 5? i4 ^V f5 I «5! I k V 5^ I i R v» 4 § I 5** 1:5^^ I Ill's; ^ XI I* I 6 -5 § os I t9 % I ft “i: k Ci ft 5 ^ “ S i^ <0 5« I I "PJ § 5' § % kI IK1 I 5 K »> Cj s «t ft V» k K I 'K K1 b 4 b' S § § K I N §ft ♦P N. C^ > 5 K S $ h N IIP S4 !q k N ft k ft k k 5; k k s R s 5 § Vi k i? !3 k v» ft 9. N ft k k k N ft k k k ft k N k « § k N ftN S k > k ft ft N § <JlS ft<«s Os ft ft« ft »1 N ;s N S 5 ft k ft k »k N ft k ft •S kk k ft ft k § 5 I § N .N 4 <s I I II*ft5:I 3ft %ft 1 1 ftft 1 III'1%5 s 1 a 1 a a ♦• ST ?»r ft « 1? 1 K* k 1>r V$S ft' ? b' a ft' 1 5 * s b b ¥ ? ft* 'vjK'a K V 19$ Q k ?j <«t a a a ft• *» ft a ^ iiVI ' ft ft ft ^ »S ft ft ft ft ft ft ft p'1 a §1 4 y 1 3sftK«ft k'* k ft“ kvak• ftft 3 a « ft 1 a K 1 1•i* §?§i1 a a 5f »f ft ft «ft'ft'ft' V $%%%S §§z y b z y y ^IV'"ft N ft N ft >4 ft va R k ft ># K k 5 %s 9t•n«\?V* ? a ;4 S4 9 ft ■>f* ft ft ft M«« ft ft ft N** ft K N.N y 1 > 1 4$ va Kn1%1w f V 1 1 To:Plani Oronc City Froas Jeam Date s Novell Subject: «135e Rene« Zoning District Pertinent Ordin A} Sectic 250* setba 75-25 Allow Exist Prop© Propo TOTAL ’*-1 Existing H. Prlnc Deck = Sidew. Drivei TOTAL ♦"*2 Hardcover i Prlnc: Deck • Sidew< Drivev TOTAL •-3 Hardcover < Princi Deck ■ Sidew4 Driveii TOTAL \ 5 §%I 1 i 5i *r -• IfV 8 h 3 S ^ W I I I K' a ?' t O «(^ ' I I ft I 5 ;;at ?5 4 « >• ►I S 9 \ V 8 ?I K V 1 5• 1 K 1 1 j \s 5h5 : i \if' \i 1 y i ll8 1 ft 1 T 1 f N i;? i :•ft s^ :3C K, H % 1 1 *§ 1 ¥!> jft |ft ft ft ft* i ‘ ^ s ^ ii. Xh Toi Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Proas Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Dates November 16r 1988 Subject #1356 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road Renewal Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR~1A Pertinent Ordinances - A) Section 10.22^ Subdivision 2 - Excess hardcover within the 75* 250' setback area. 75-250' Setback Area = 15,870 s.f. Allowed Hardcover ■ 3,968 s.f. or 25% Existing Hardcover ** 5,679 s.f. or 36% *-l Proposed Hardcover (application 1184) * 6,048 s.f. or 38.1% *-2 Proposed Hardcover (current appl.) * 6,048 s.f. or 38.1% *-3 TOTAL HARDCOVER INCREASE * 369 s.f. or 2.3% *-l '*■, ■ Existing Hardcover * Principal Structure Deck » 715 s.f. Sidewalk » 410 s.f. Driveway - 600 s.f. TOTAL - 5,679 s.f. 3,954 s.f. *-2 Hardcover Approved #1184 Principal Structure Deck - 430 s.f. Sidewalk ■ 410 s.f. Driveway « 600 s.f. TOTAL - 6,048 s.f. 4,608 s.f 3>Hardcover Current Proposal - Principal Structure - 4,696.5 s.f. Deck « 590 s.f. Sidewalk * 341.5 s.f. Driveway - 420 s.f. TOTAL « 6,048 g.f. I I& . ^ mm •* MMm *1. f ' ? ■a « V..4 Zoninc Noveml Page < 1 List submi the i prin< mast< than revi< need side is s driv appl in t! I Zoning Fil® #1356 November 16, 1988 Page 2 of 2 B) Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side setback variance required for bathroom addition on the north side of house. Required = 30* Existing - 15* Proposed (#1184) = 13*.3** or 57% Proposed (current appl.) ■ 13*3" or 57% List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Application Property Owners List Plat Map Planning Commission Minutes of 5/8/87 Council Minutes of 9/28/87 Council Minutes of 10/12/87 Resolution #2279 Revised Site Plan Elevation The applicant proposes no major changes from the original submitted a year ago. Review the hardcover facts Tf tor til the asterick items #2 and #3. There is an increase of 88.S s.f. for Brlncioal residence resulting from the last minute re-adjustment of the than th* 90 ..f. originally preaantad baioro the th^ review. The increase in the decks in the current proposal results *' to have a deck at a proposed door at the southwest corner of the lake ^d. of thl house (r.view"ExLbit I - the lake side is still maintained at 6,048 s.f. or 38.1% by reducing driveway areas. Staff recommends approval of the renewal plication for Gerald McCourtney subject to the same conditions set forth in the original resolution #2279. t mm • :r' ; ^ ; Si . ■ e. V I- P ffjt 'i**: i r ■ w- • ■ M BARDbtiXJrDescri enf oreDSSCRlPnOl Descr: Code ] RBQOIBED n 1 • Comple 2. CertiJ this : 348-3: 3. Stamp names obtaii Certii Topog] in ex: Plat I As an any o- Addit: The Appli‘ remember 1 informatioi Certif icat; Zoning Off; APPLICAHT*: The appli requested unusual ex the infori knowledge. Applicant ' OfiHERS SIG The owner authorizes agents, Co tion and v Owner's Si Applicant Planning C third Monc review mee unable to authorized Office of riance required lal applicatiofi i, specifically .5 s.f. for the lustment of the rdcover rather St their final esults froBi the ner of the lake an). Hardcoyer ^ sidewalk and i.iwal varianca tions set forth . -1 IP r : :51l “““eLribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting fr. enforcement of zoning regulations;—------------------------------------n strict”“°^!^^bfu^^P^^rcort^”Tpreventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. RBQUIREI SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application . - owners within 150* (you must obtainCertified Property Owners List of owners wicnin r<»nter this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). anvaiones (#10) pre-addressed to each of the ®a“ron tV‘e’“aio’ve* U. "ritS"no return^ddress (use address labels ob«.i«.d «»« „„ o.iail.tlo». •• t.qblt«4- ',:f4'rSic 1. »y cb.„^. in existing grade are proposed. •_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ information has not been included._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ certlilcatlorb^zonlnroeplr^en^^^^ Application is complete. Datezoning Official's Signature • , _ _: APFLICAHT'S SIGHATOKB j - all information required orThe applicant hereby agrees to provide all^inforaa^ requested by the Zo"i“9 %f this application,*and certifies that “ri“nfo“r^rtJ“ s"up"putd' is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge• Applicant’s Signatur^Date ackowledges “1 \‘^%%VpeVty'by’ ® VtaK^ tion and verification of this request. DateOwner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals on the Planning Commission Meeting. ^“^^jVbTprU^ all scheduled third Monday of each month. ^ Council. If an applicant isreview meetings of the Planning emission and ,„ts to hav. an unable to attend a scheduled meeting, .dvise the^uilding S Zoningauthorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Buii Office of this change prior to the meeting. i/d %-y t \ f tl.: ’ . : • ^ 4 -H - -4::: ■ •'fj CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional varian Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address \OSS V^' Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ _ r"%.i r^ry nc -zn:;nuAtt uf ui'tunw rTnf/«-,T rzu*rcI •Mrmtv.i. V/ i i»^ L» . . — ! .'j* f *^! M \J 'U V i. V' V V W rucrv Uf L.un I i T : Z^r.l 71 ! U I W « V 75 u Please check oue - Property \ abstract or torrens?^ J Jii’i' y i^i i IujLi / t j tmu\ lufU Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. •ji, I nu.i. ^ ; ^-Z7A r *A- 7Zt”n **•* Y . w . ' W V iS i.' M : Ir \J :n/7l APPLICANT Phone (home) Name ^T. ^ ^ Phone (work) Address; \OSS \fj. City; ^(LO»JO Zip: OffNER (if different than applicant) Name c^Bj(U^uy T. ^ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address; iOSS City; rz^oo Date Property Acquired uj _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ Zip; t (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. MB BIP MB MB ^Bi MB ^PB BPP MB MM 4BP MM MM 4BP MM MB MM MB «^BP MM MM MM ^BP MB MM MM MB MB MM MM MB MM MM e^B MM MM MB MM MM P^P MM MM MM ^PB MB MM PIB MM MBP BPP MM PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property LrLi A Residential Other (specify) OIMCRIPTION OF RBQOBST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: Pflttu/ouS UiO>^^4aaC ^ ^5 VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side &Rear) Vi li iii m,*, -1»• 4 IPI’ WMi PI '¥■: • m,.:t i-<r flL 82 r U4 M M SM H r v932 M a »-!!S & e 2 2 FI A| I N & 11 7 5SI PI Mm M N4 s=*o a o a FI 01 FI Q c. a I PJ ^sa iSS^I S* M O M ft M K FI yj ui MSase 7sa a ^ Ui «-• •• mm iu U U »>« M B FI M < : 'Mb f ft ^ a ^ r';:v '■■ , ' X-■ -Vi:'■v';: \ vV:::v 4T r; r-Tv nr k ^ I ? W* w*? »C *> » •*r*** - - • ^ p A w*w^ V4>vv V VV :c: r^.- I w • V V V. f 4-U ?\ • * » w» « V'V «**«... .. . ..... •••w I W r V . » f ;( /# W ^ U J. / # • M. titji f u'U' ': ^ -wTA * ■• ,, . “T ^ - t* . w k • W W \ fc' A / V W • on • A,'7» , - V/ w A . 5ti- 3*M 7 . 2ip* *9 9 L*»-^ •»/'*_ ___S ip: inth/year) Residential ^3 Rear) «: - ..:V'-..,.-U. r=-- r, c s| 9^ l i <9 C» s t1 2 2 o 19 »9 M N ^ - V >> lA fO I M O N f'* >• MS Is Kl Ut <# aI| o ifac Kl Ul LA -J lA I IM &s9 ii* m 19 fli 9S»si •s -L ^sss M3 SS^ M Q B| SJfisaS N lii -i* q: M lift ud ^ X X M» I u us ^ ^ KOf} 1^ 3 K fM ft RS SS «w aiisi Mi >• \ OL ^ Mrfim >9 M I fSI R 19 M I N Ian <49 R 19 cy rn I M R gfciTaa s E K = SOS lU _ ^ U Ul ^ C > ^ 19 _ s < 19 •9 n P LA mls 19 Ul LA > >• -J LAill, gg;2M M 3 H ^ >• Sg Ul LA mJ LAa & <523 rr*" a a M S i i - 3 if _ Othi£a X >• a “< s 3 t:: /< t.'i i* r rU.eU^a J3* S 19 Ul g LU eS5 IM Ul lA S -I LA M » R e a a R 3 M 3 !u Mo o >• o a >.| K1 Ul P ^ M''igSSR lA Q 5 O < Ul tVi 5 U U Q U) S If ^ 5m lift ul- ►-K.^5 8»9S^a^ ^ lA *P*»r» ^ ^ in ^ e B tt LA S MM LM S O Bo 5 p -« o s 99 Ul :l§RJ X ►- I B LA Ai. vu Q M kk. X •iM M I «l M O lA U s^- S PB 5 t> H- LA Ul lA g^LA 5 Q ^25 LU X LA N U P >• 99 O 2j B *-• 3 ae BBgi >• N B 5 ^ U Pt ^ 32^ /IO ^ I ss 99 til Lil LA ^ «J LA 99 g a & < *}'i223 N Lil ^ ^ 3 X •• U» lA LA UJ S*-• u» • * 3C ^ 5 Al 3 H B LA >» >• ^ < S*“5S RS33S3 ii«§S X UJ ?5 >- \ • ® » Sg^2 23;^- f* * '■vvctip ma mpK-^:-6^ au'iv •.-■•’ ► BUB :r'^otiqtna*^^ r« ftW oce®'^ / /fCOf j PUt. JTiV^ S>t U7.R.23 » Him ♦1176 RI< 2765 CAS< #1184 Gi' \i:1055 FBI Vl^IANCl COHTIIiUi MIKOTES of THB PLAHNING COMMISSIOH MmiHG HBIi) SEP'TBMBBR 8. 1987 overly ------- Cohen noted that ^^s'tp^fovTd Tt wou?" setting a if this application is approve negative precedent* ,p55 FBRHDM»E ROM) WEST noted• clrlld Mccourtney and da.es Cradit, his architect, were present Building s 2°"^"?„/t®h«dcSverva “r*‘’a^^^^^^^ *°*****^l^^*'’'Thi8 is a 1.5% increase in setback variance; 30 side Thev also will require a 15 ,,,,rrently does encroach into setback is required. The hou encroaching any more. actually ovci. ----------- w^i^^hev Mr. McCourtney noted that ’'/*"J*o*ae\\ng^t^^^^^ “re^lacin'g c"lose°r'val^a^iln Is others in the their home up to a ciosei. neighborhood•neignoornwww. matter There were no cosunents from th« P“^"^=St"ir^-s%ecVived no “"g^t^^^^“.^-^r?r»U“o/i^ surrounding neighbors.negative comment, ------------ Nays 0. #1186 DOOG v«i 3800 ?S^:S!aT/COimKBCIM. SITE PLAH KWlEW~5g3rtiS«L ’.SSS4^fS»s^ 4 i. m I . i;- M ■hUiA : :K. & mimotes o: #1163 MCDOWE RBSOLOTIOn •■.V ¥ mbbr iv onded by Cohen to 2765 Casco Point equired for this er constitute an ^yes 5, Nays 0 ise he feeis that Ld be setting a te of Hailing wer# explained the . for a bathroom# shore yard. This 50* setback area, rariance; 30* side 068 cncro&cli into aching any more, he additions are ,r and while they hey will also be »ct should bring others in the cding this matter has received no q neighbors .L” MIMOTBS of THB REGOIAR OROHO COONClI. HBBTING HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 1987 upgrading of Woodhill Avenue noting that it would not enhance or benefit his property. He upgrading is solely due to the woodhill Ridge development. Mayor Grabek agreed that although Mr. McDowell seemed quite open regarding paying his fair share, it would be best for all concerned to settle the issue prior to road construction. again for Council reconsideration. agreemfent with Woodhill to protect the access for Lot 3. woodhill Ridge conditioned upon execution of ® suitable Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1184 tiERAU) MCCOORTHBy 1055 fERMDALB ROAD tfBST RBSOLOTIOH #2264 Gerald McCourtney was present for this matter lIM-iliSsISSi bathroom addition. Planning Commission approval and no negative comments from surrounding neighbors have been received. It was moved by Counci Imember °o®.*-‘®"' Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2264 per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 4 V ■ 'Pliv ^^3 ■^4.- ? r m MINUTES #1184 GERAl 1055 WEST 1 VARIANCE REQUEST TO amended re: MAYOR'S RE CITY ADMIN 1988 MEETI 1988 BOARD DEER HUNT] ORDINANCE t m 28, 1987 staged that his rono Orchard Road rono Orchard and ird paying for the that it would not e noted that the Woodhill Ridge , McDowell seemed hare, it would be ssue prior to road I that should the present the issue ined the issue of iccess through the ry Club over the >ad access ever be native access is ub and on to the very stringent access for Lot 3* by CounciImember ►ving the plat of ion of a suitable ilicants regarding i; and combining roperty. Motion, 8 matter. id the request to ly room, dinette .5% increase In ck variance for iion recommended Izom surrounding itten, seconded by :ion #2264 per staff I Q. mimutbs op THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1987 §1184 GERALD T. McCOURTNEY 1055 WEST FERNDALE VARIANCE REQUEST TO AMEND PREVIOUS APPROVAL AMENDED RESOLUTION *2279^^^Betnhardson explained the request to amend the previously approved addition plans. The request involves an additional 90 s.f. 75-250' zone; and placement of bathroom addition 13 from sld^lot line instead of the 15* previously approved. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2279 approving the amended plan as proposed subject to no additional mino pgvisions. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR'S REPORT:Mayor Grabek had no report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 1988 MEETING CALENDAR/ 1988 BOARD OP “^VIEW^DATO counc i Imember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Council proposed 1988 schedule for its ™eeting with establishing Tuesday, March 22, 1988 as its Board of Review date for 1988 and refer the schedule to the Planning Commission for their input. Motion, Aye , Nays 0. deer HUNTING - BAKER PARK ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. ^^SBCOND^,^, B®"^ardson explained the issue of a^et^r-Tn^Bah^^r^^^T /o7 a^'’;e^f:diof excled three days per year. He noted that there were no comolaints received during last year's hunt and close to 100% of the hunters did get a deer. Staff 5®®?""'®" ^ adoption of the ordinance amendment finding it the m effective way to limit the nuisance of deer to crop. areas in that area. Tt was moved bv Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember “etersZ that Ordinance No. 42, Second Series be adoDted as an amendment to ordinance No. 25, Second sLies wallow for selected discharge of fire arms in Lker Park in accordance with the City permit. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. the < City Muni Subd laun of 2 area 13'3 the Minn R 12# 1987 d the request to .on plans. The hardcover in the m addition 13*3" 15' previously by CounciImembet ) approving the additional minor an, seconded by \cil review the schedule together 988 as its Board schedule to the Motion# Ayes 4, led the issue Of the use of shot a period not to at*there were no iunt and close to taff recommends ding it the most of deer to crop by Counc i Iraembe c icond Series be ' No. 25, Second I of fire arms in permit. Motion# <5 1 City of ORONO _____. 'CtT# .V-' V.' ofa aRONO resolution of the city council NO. 2279--------------- A RESOLDTIOM GRANTING VARIANCES TO MONICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22# SOfeDIVISION 1 and section 10.23# SUBDIVISION 6 (B) PILE #1184 WHEREAS# Gerald T. the the owner of th^e "City") and legally described as follows;City of Orono (hereinafter City ) ana leyax j see Exhibit A, attached, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHBRMS, the aWlicant has applied^ W^the ^ity variances^to Municipal Zoning Code Section ‘ of bathroom, dinette, and Subdivision 6 (B) to in increase laundry room additions to the 75-250 feet lakeshore setback of 2.1% or 369 s.f. of hardcover «yhrn the = setback variance of area where only 25% or 3,968 s.f. if all d d further into Minnesota: MOW. TBBREFORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1184. 2’ The property is located in the bR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning the^proposed variancess;ptember 8# 1987# and recommended approval of the prop based upon the following findings: 4: 4-v.-5e rsY-nn^artv is located within the C A) over 50% of the area of this property 1 to 75 feet lakeshore protected area. B) The 16,000 square feet ^-Yor^yy'^hardc^ve^r'on^the provides adequate treatment area for tne nar property C) The City has received hO negative comments from the adjacent, most affected neighbors. Page 1 of 4 =/-. 4 , 4 ____JL_ I-'V I^.V. iv I 48 V’ i •i;.. i/: - ■ ’v. M r m : ?*r fin Cit var 5. prc prc not ha2 as del Sul wil of City Co 10.22# constru and sid< 1. be CO 2. wi ac Cc (S 3. cc zc h« 4. t< 3\ <5 pplicant**) is id within the )1 lews: ind r variances to >ection 10.23# dinette# and in an increase ishore setback ck variance of " further into :e. ncil of Ofofto, mily Lakeshore application on >posed variances ted within the 0 yard area ex on the :om the adjacentf City of OROiVO CIT¥f OF QRONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2279__________ 5J 4, The City Council P^^^^nning Comiis°sl^ by findings and ® o\Lant and the effect of the proposed ji ♦-Via4- the conditions existing on this 5. The City Council A apply generally to other property are peculiar to ^ . that granting the variances would property in this zoning 4-ions light# air nor pose a fire ^oAdvIrsely affect nSrely serve hazard or other f to alleviate an.* of i«’.« o, \¥. ‘Sw c™o.o.o.». ».= of the City. CONCLOSlONSr ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of zon^^^ Section City Council hereby grants subdivision 6 (B) to perm^ the 10.22, Subdivision 1 and structure that requires hardcover anrsfdfse^baclc^vfrtLces, subject to the following conditions: 1. The drainage j^^itered^at a^re^sult°lf ""the^ptoposed be permanently or temporarily alterea construction. . a. A 4-v. 4-his resolution run with the property not2. Authorities granted with ^ust be exercised by with the applicant# within one year of the date of application for a l^^^riances will expire on that date Council approval# or these (September 28# 1988). 3. Violation of or ”gt\\u^o ’^a°violat^on'^ of the ro"n?;;^g^roL:^ s^^a^^ ■^au^^o^t^ca fly^ te?S|n^e a.y authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdeme I * ^ - r , _ _ _ j -I • read# understood and hereby agrees4. The undersigned applicant ^ behalf of himself# his heirs#to the terms °f this resolution and on behalf of ^e^^iru^T^^irtV^hiL-^of Srt^%^^o/rhe property. Page 2 of 4 /Ddrbthy M Property Owi ■'-'.w' V 'V y 3n including the Sion, reports by : of the proposed munity. icisting on this srally to other variances would nor pose * fire not merely serve r to alleviate a ^ to preserve a Id be in keeping mprehensive Plan above, the Orono ling Code Section ;b) to permit the eauires hardcover Ltions: perty shall not of the proposed the property not be exercised by of the date of on that date of the terns and violation of the authority granted »d and hereby agrees limself, his heiri, recording of this r V.. m i Ui ■r. r City of OROIVO CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2219 __________ Adopted by the Orond City Council on this 12th day of October Property Owner(s) 2^' Pace 3 of 4 1m i. m , v' [V; -rv r : :; -'v,. \ -1 \ i STATE COUNTS on th befor* appea known f orec the s STAT COUN On t a £peri and (th< -1- of October, L \\City of OFiOiVOi _ CITY OF ORONa resolution of the city council NO. 2229----------------> STATE OF MINEESOTA )) ss COUHTY OF HENNEPIN ) , 198 7 H.US? taro r:rV:u appeared M^rourtneY—^ , _____who executea rnet^arheTtheyTVxTcut'ed i".«.V“,:S2ir)%”reract and laed. q/7 /Q2 my commission expires SBPaSS STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) SS • COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) 29^On this a “ " , 198^, before me (their) free act and deed. notary 4 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 ■ ■■m *' / . # •• ■ «r aas paint of Tract (egistrar of Title allowing describe Dminenclog at the long the northeas I ron monument I nence southerly. < f degrees, ll. mlf onument; thence < ;Ovirse to the shoi • 1 i ____, 198_7 persons1Xy cecuted the -) executed before sR® appeared ) be the strxiinent, e as his ‘ ^ ■<-MM.- mm •-• •-. •: • ■••• ■ - -.:•>* . ■■ ■,*; , • ■ ::| T mi •:.. .'-^EXHIBIT AHfi RESOLUTION l^o.ZZl^ • « • •• • • ..: • . . a ‘# •• • •• • **••♦ ^?» • *• . t #* • V *^‘• *.* i . *• . # • • **'*•*., ‘* • • • * • * . .. . . • * • . e • • • • A • • . . •...#; .^ • • *.•. . • *.•••.?••••,• • ;•.• ., * * ••*. *" .••* • * : / , • . t . ..• ^ . • • * • ' -t. i«:i?£5TO *•• ; • . ; • . ‘ ^ / -t ^ ••■• •••V-: ■;;. .. •■ : ,.•••.• .. .. , . : ■-•; •>,■:.. ■ ' ■ ■■ •*•>*•*. .• -••V •;■:'.■• *?■’.. •;••• •'•-;-<• .• .,*. . .** .'. •;.,•*•• I •• •. • V • •., ' tcnAi: PESCHIPTION .■.. ;Y ' , .... . . • • • *^* . * . • • • . .. . ■ . . • • *'•••'.*» . * • • nat part o> Tract 'tulwing SUcMbad ’unS"aSd ?ra«%!^Mnc2*?oCthea3terly ,li,enclSg-at the "“''‘'’-^^‘"‘PstrS^ract I ^«‘tanc• of r!«heS- --long the northeasterly Une of said Tra^^^ the ,Une..to be described, -i iron monument 5®i?L»?»/to thc*^rlght from the last described course ;• :• e •1 X • e • •• f •.**••• * •* ' • . * * * r •. *• r.• • • • '.• • * • ' ^ . :.' • ..*■'* ■ ' ■ • * ‘ ■ ''*■•; ’j»v ■*. V*j*- -..m '■ *• *••' '• • • •• ' ••.*-.V ■•:• :•v^ *_*iH i—‘I li ■ wii—I T------------------------ - i r 1^11*11 ■ ■ tm^yrnmutm ■ B^e ^. . . ^... e • V*#• • ^ . » • . .. • ii;: ; ■ t '• • a • - # *' vvi'. Pi ‘1 mm Wj < "9 '/ _.'T*. .p 5:1 mm mm StATC CO0IT cm CounI forei elth proe< on ^ end • Coun • •>es of the ly of the .. nsions. :e southeasterly 17.85 feet to be described; * bed course Tin iron jV • -I la^t described re terminating. . • .*• r . f • * * . • i ‘ • • • • * . r • • • , • .. . e ■ ■* ;:•'• « • ■ m' m 4 \ '4ril mm. StATC or NXiUCSOTA couiTT or ■tiMtrxi CITY or OlOlO ) ) ) ) ) 1 porotby «. city Cl.rb of "J'.Y.rtwoV"d"*th^ 1. "t”;%%‘Vr.Voi»ri:‘'.f‘m cm cou».« "'.‘ViSiu."'-?'ts: Counoil at said neetingo in Wltn.o. Wb.roof, I h.». h.r.unto s.t ny hoiiO T9iih . day of Octobe r —• • ^ ■ thy M -f'vyi //if^ (SUL) • • • • • ^ m • ’ • «*• •• *• • STAT COUN iaii«plA •4 tli« f oroBO of tliB 11 b«14 I m truo U City lol tm« CITY OF ORONa STATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HENNEPIN City of ORONORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILNO. 2279__________ ) ) ss. ) gSfore me- . Noilly PubllH wUhlf aSr ^sVld county, p«J-sonally appeared Kam McCOurtney . . j i a>vAriit:ed me the same as his (their) free act and deed- 198_7 notary public / ,/Za -C 9/2/92 my commission EXPXKES STATE OP MINNESOTA ) )S8. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) on this s^/i^ot^^-pTrsonaYly^^^P^ar^^ a Rotary / known ‘s to me to be_ the [7-era IcL 7^ the foregoing instrument, rndtck’nowhd^ed that he ('they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.• / SOTARYPOBLIC 9n my COMMISSION expires Page 4 of 4 '4 ^ *i ;; m m \f •• 1 '4 To: tr< Date: Subject: The I action. ] holidays Planning C The < month). : because ol been canc< October 2r meetings s that the o of applic2 Schcd I i 0 CCS Mark I Michae Doroth Laurie f V P ___, 198_7 personally iecutedtne ) executed / befcgre me appaarcHl > be the strumentr e as his X■r\ V ,.V^’ m mi i.:i 1 I •ij TOs FroBs Dates Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson • * Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 4, 1988 Subjects Planning Commission Schedule for 1989 holidays and have been rescheduled for the following Tuesday - Doe Planning Commission prefer another day of the week? meetings begin in the month of May (first Mondays of th month), pe first meeting in July (July 3rd) may not be a viable optic because of the July 4th holiday. The first Monday meeting of September ha conflict with the Labor Day holiday and a October 2nd optional meeting has been scheduled in its place. The optiona expands from May through October and it is understoc that the optional meetings will continue to be scheduled based on the leve Of applications filed for the regular meeting held on the third Mondays. Schedule Changes to be Acted on by the Planning Commission - 1. Re-scheduling of regular meetings for January and February t Tuesday - another day of the week. ^ 2. To retain July 3rd^ 1989 as optional meeting date or removfrom schedule. - 3. To schedule optional meeting for October 2, 1989 to replac first Monday meeting date in September - consistent with optiona meetings scheduled for 1988. cc;Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Laurie Scheffler, City Recorder V V I I» “ 1 I ' J I iPiB^v:Iw ?rpr. r#4.*2L' ■=■1^1 ■nIEli ^:• --.;* v ki ff([ ./^ **^m’» >• Jbr:; *;r!;iV-.‘jri-u. ^J7TL«4. » ». — n. UM TiW »JI. (•) *«««rt«ii lt«M ar* aaattaara« «a ha raaataa taaaa ta ha aaaaaa4 araa hr aaa aaaiaa hr tha rtaaalat Ciaataataa aa4at tha Caaaaat I«aa* aa «aa aaaiiaa. Uaaaaaiaa alii ha haia aaaa raaaaat. ■tra - harhaia rataaa raaaalaa a. flit a>*> U*M laM • «ar« Bm. lai* ■awIlM halaa «. tiM nW4 tahaat Wahaa • JaM ChaalaliMrttf Ihliahaa mat - MMIatataa a« a ia« Liaa h T. till flMl hUtat a. aiM um a. taarr taa. a aaa al aa at a a wHai ata Mahalaa laM Mthla taahaaiaa r - aivUlat la haaaaatat a n«l«aa aaaa aa hitni lia a ■Mlaaaa haah a. a>il ama M aala a na Jahaaaa. aat/aaa aana haaaaila aa • aMM raw Itaatai aa haataa taaaa aa ha«la at ttaa r.B. I ta. ataa tint ettr aa aaaaa. caaa aa t Mr Mai •.................I aaa iBaMt • thM ha at aa it. aiirr laaaaa Mt«a. tan caraaal riaaa • tanlaaaa • haaaat Baaiaa aaalaa hr Hawaii 11. aim ta. amt haaaaaa t caa«maa •U. atlM haaiia T. ta. laaaa a at ac ttta •It. riaaaiaa •U. ha< U. jna a a^ raaaiaaiaa aa aalaaa a \ ^ taaa I • Denotes Hennepin County R/W Monument o Denotes iron monument #1 JL. EXISTING PARCELS; PARCEL k AND PARCEL B; Lot 2, Block 1, DRAGONFLY HILL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL C; A strip Of land in Government Lot 1, Section 11, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, said strip of land having a uniform width of 60.00 feet and bounded on the east by the shore of Lake Minnetonka and on the west by the shore of Mud or Round Lake (so-called). The northerly line of which said 60.OC foot strip of land is described as follows: Beginning at a point 585.84 feet southeasterly measured along a line which bears South 10 degrees East from the meander corner of the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 1; thence North 67 degrees 48 minutes East a distance of 14.3 feet more or less to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence South 67 degrees 48 minutes West a distance of 207.27 feet more or less to the shore of Mud or Round Lake (so-called). The southerly boundary line of said 60.00 foot strip being a line parallel with and 60.00 feet southerly from and measured at a right angle to the northerly line above described land. Excepting from said above described strip the public highway crossing said tract all according to the United States government survey thereof. PROPOSED PARCELS AFTER DIVISION; PARCEL A; CRemaisins FbrteO That part of Lot 2, Block 1, DRAGONFLY HILL lying northerly of the south 37.03 feet thereof, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL B AND PARCEL Ct (Htw IWcel) PARCEL B; The southeasterly 37.03 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, DRAGONFLY HILL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL C; A strip of land in Government Lot 1, Section 11, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, said strip of land having a uniform width of 60.00 feet and bounded on the east by the shore of Lake Minnetonka and on the west by the shore of Mud or Round Lake (so-called). The northerly line of which said 60.OC foot strip of land is described as follows: Beginning at a point 585-84 feet southeasterly measured along a line which bears South 10 degrees East from the meander corner of the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 1; thence North 67 degrees -18 minutes East a distance of 14.3 feet more or less to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; tlience South 67 degrees 48 minutes West a distance of 207.27 feet more or less to the shore of Mud or Round Lake (so-called). The southerly boundary line of said 60.00 foot strip being a line parallel with and 60.00 feet southerly from and measured at a right angle to the northerly line above described land. Excepting from said above described strip the public highway crossing said tract all according to the United States government survey thereof. AREAS; PARCEL A PARCEL B - PARCEL C - 5,061 square feet 8,135 square feet I certify tflOt this (iirtriy, planer repOM by m« or und«r my dirtct luporm n 0 duly Rdgitltrdd Lond Survdyor jnd«r Jawt of tho Stott of Mmnttoio. A TTilufv s/isJbb mz6 ALL-METRO LAND SURVEYORS 2340 Daniels Street, Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph; 475- 1433 Proppf d Property Divition = 40’ BOOK ^PAGE 42 ^ILE NO. %18145 C oE PREPARED FOR: LOREN BORN o LO Ip fi 1l n-cl'',JOC) H % UMfa M g H *» 4» lu «H «M O' Cn B n rt in <e i to r> o> ^ ^ “ff\o' Ue n -• II K-a • o 9 •s^^ o8.:u s u liFJll \o>-*- rt'R Is - lb IK e ^ SCK eaicocre eoeCC£JrKOS£ tlil5::ZZS£S;t Oe« 9 00*0k«li9*jao«* e<*«*>9 • evK oev«ti«f 9 s *»uo \ --ii-c*<w^>er»»95IO m 9 re^rne* 0* SOXK9C9 •— K»O -•• •V«0 BO* =s ‘’?5i;5~tT.ss b •«>«■ ImKC «> e**UB4 U019BVM -2 5^S?S3».‘-g-S (k9*iy«k« r*l“.-Sw..gS£ c?*'Se*°2 2 - 2T§-o£| Sl^QlJg^ m «*KA>B-*'0eebmm K 8 • • « « 3,S*£?S.=S-- _^x.bo* Kie^ cx:«ee«OK-«4* 5“s!s8i:I’5Ss acoo o**>«*** S S ■ > ■ O g8t-5|:S|• ^ 4J s k« *^xe<r«Ki->i2B«*>« BK •»«e«MO •.• S,5irS"5^ gS-^? g 0* w •Boat**'* «boao»c««<>*(j ?23'.3:25-rw : iiur.zuv-^^ i. o » -* Ss ip II a “ g - r zm 9 E ^ s ~. |5fr •- • ' 'i 2 €5 •If -p I ill al 11* II =- i t ! Sri Hi III ill S5 -s1 gt#«Ks S- v*v §g S sS 'IS |S ■ *r O 3 Mlli;1. d 1 r I (Mill i'IP 2 oa " 2?4Sb.>n S r ill 3 n-??Hin:2:feg III I Jir.liniMt; E -5 s2 - sa 3 22 S SS 4^ • •*••••• III 7".‘ I'^r- g I 55 2 I gf g a 5S'^3"g''.355«vO a «v»«Oa»9999 •:? = ilHltni-s-II II S3 f*«« a ■ A<xaM*«f« 3 •“ao» e 903^a«^a a *<af* a»n***« r• a a 9(1^ —nf»o«» «»oooc*a a o*« aa n <o^<r- - «» »?a o a a------------ K*aM a*aao7 aaa •« r* f* a a a a- - - a avn*fc*0^** ______aa*aia mmavn 3^^rSs55‘Si?-1 I 3* o o* .Baaa_a —o' r s a r Jo«zs.^s=’r- 7 =is ? *!ls5'nsui« o »« • • ira IT 9 a ••«» *« » aa r-?-S?*S3S-5!J.11 ft f? I T^«SMl5Prr fte®! r pPpiii ‘ ils;:i-s?s- pcf I‘i'i’ ,ll^" ^IrtVf Uc9U«€. 1‘ / ✓ • A A—-/- ' / hr>x>\nei*-X ,itf view siAc/k^;£ / /' - Zfe* ^CJOE- pt-iNkwl “To I io> • ' -I t :i r • J i I < ii 3? i-i lit U«5t O #1352 i"-200 ’ Proposed Detcrlptlon Pores I A - Se.hem/1'9 Jmeohs TIk)8« P^» of Lot 1, Block 1, KATHLEEH'S FREHCH LAKE, according to the recorded plat tMTtof and fiovemwnt Lot 6. Section 9, ToMnshIp 117 North, Range 23 West of tho 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Coaencing at the nost southerly comer of Tract A. Registered Land Survey No. 1467, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence on an assueed bearing of North 0 degrees 15 Minutes 35 seconds Hast, along an easterly line of said Tract A, a distance of 605.31 feet, to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 57 degrees 46 Minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 821.40 feet; thence North 14 degrees 50 Minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 112.04 feet, to a southeadllrly line of said Tract A; thence South 61 degrees 07 Minutes 32 seconds Most, along said southeasterly line, a distance of 471.77 feet to an angle point In the easterly line of said Tract A; thence South 0 degrees 15 Minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 158.52 feet to the point of beginning. The above described property contains 1.39 acres. Parcel B - Jacobs' Present Property Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1467. Parcel C - Charles Schoen's Remaining Property Lot 1, Block 1, KATHLEEN'S FRENCH LAKE, according to the recorded plat thereof EXCEPT that part described asifollows: CoMiiencIng at the nost southerly comer of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1467, Hennepin County, Minnesota: thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 15 Minutes 35 seconds Nest, along an easterly line of said Tract A, a distance of 605.31 feet, to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 57 degrees 46 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 521.40 feet; thence North 14 degrees 50 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 112.04 feet, to a southeasterly line of said Tract A; thence South 61 degrees 07 minutes 32 seconds West, along said southeasterly line, a distance of 471.77 feet to an angle point In the easterly line of said Tract A; thence South 0 degrees 15 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 158.52 feet to the point of beginning. GENERAL NOTES: North 60 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds East - Denotes bearing per recorded plat of KATHLEEN'S FRENCH LAKE. INorth 0 degrees 15 minutes 35 seconds He^- Denotes bearing per Registered Land Survey No. 1467 and proposed description. Boundaries of Lot 1, Block 1, KATHLEEN'S FRENCH LAKE taken from recorded plat. SI ^ £ S DATE: BOOK: 296 PAGE: 3S, ■Nr DATE BY REVISIONS ______REVISION CKD BY CERTIFICATION 1 hereby certify th8t this survey ««s prepered under my supervision end thet I ee • I Rented Lend Surveyor under the levs of the Stetc of Mlnne^te. The^ore D. keiuie BB License No. 1700& SCHOELL & MADSON, ^ ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS ^ PLANNERS • SOIL TESTING 10550 WAYZATA BLVO. MINNETONKA. MN. 55343 (612) 546-7601 incA CLIENT SHCLOON JACOBS LOCATION OQONO. MIHNCSOTA S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61185 -001 CO 01 ■§s In * IT »*f Z ^si I p ”^E28 8 8^» 8 § o S’ ffi ”"3. ioP Se?’* g & ^ IT G* t* § t- S ’ w Pzl ll!l SoR IKd f Si • l- ^!|ii »i]ol ’’’■ B.is _ gsgs-a I •S' '“I § s 5. i !ii i a .^■gr i m H- Hi S > Op W H rr B Hi a f i O S t- tn _ ro _ ^§i 8 I EsIb ?E5S- «-al| bPn fT Qi I-* a^s’S &°^985^1 ^ u> 5 4:- l^fl S w f? COFFIN a GRONBERG, INC. engineers , land surveyors and planners U3NG LAKE. MINNF.qOTA K,/«’ * ;r * •< o-n O o Z' S zzm oo O CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR Einar Hagberg of Lot 4, Auditors Subdivision No. 362 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR Einar Hagberg i I of Lot 4, Auditors Subdivision No. 362 1 » •waMiiTnV''' \ -V. •• / ///^