Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-10-1993 Council PacketMINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD HAY 10. 1993 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Edward Callahan, CounciImembers J. Oiann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Charles Kelley and JoEllen Hurr. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, City Engineer Glenn Cook, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, and Recorder Bosma. Jeffrey Johnson and Stephen Peterson represented the Planning Commission. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 8:34 P.M. (•1) CONSENT AGENDA Jabbour added Items *5, 7, 8 and 11. Kelley added Item #20. Mayor Callahan added Items #22 and 23A. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Qoetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all I terns adopted by consent agenda will be included In the minutes In their respective numerical order. (#2) WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS LaOean McWilliams reported they are celebrating the organization*s 20th ar iiversary and presented a plaque to the City for its continued support. Mayor Callahan thanked the organization for the fine work they are doing. McWilliams reported there are now 19 cities participating. (»«3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by .ahbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular Council, meeting held April 26, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no comments. HINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS J«ftr«y Johnson suggested since the Council will be appointing new members, this would be an opportune time to establish a joint session with the Planning Commission. Mayor Callahan thanked him for his past service. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPOPT (#4) 91806 JON & SHIRLEY BILLIGMEIER, 2935 FARVIEW LANE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION 93272 Mr. and Mrs. BiI Iigmeier were present. Mabusth explained the applicants seek a setback variance ® oroposed accessory structure (tennis court) which Is required to be placed behind the front line of the existing residence and maintain a 60* setback. The tennis court Is proposed at a 17 setback because It the structure was moved to the south, the topography Is very steep and several mature trees would have to be removed that now provide a natural buffer. meet the required side setback of 30’. Approval is conditioned upon the septic system being staked prior to construct Ion. There will be a 6* high retaining wall to support the base of the tennis court. Goetten questioned whether the setback from the septic system could be met. Mabusth stated the tennis court will meet the 20’ **^^J®*^ JJJ septic system and that is why the retaining wall Is to be Installed to allow for drainage to flow away from the septic system. Goetten clarified that the only real concern is the placement of the tennis court In the front yard. Mabusth noted In the entire development. It®. nlTurl?accessory structure placed In the front yard, but with the natural Jc^Je^ng In the area and the curve of the road, tennis court will not be that noticeable. She noted several of the neighbors appeared at the Planning Commission meeting In support OT the project. ',1 «■ ,iV\ MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 ZONING FILE #1806 - CONT. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Hurr, to adopt Resolution #3272 for Application #1806 Jon and Shirley Billigmeier, 2935 Farview Lana, approving a front yard setback and allowing the accessory structure to be placed in ^ron^ of the principal structure. Ayes 5, nays 0. (»#5) #1807 SUSAN MARIE SUMEY, 1330 CHERRY PLACE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMTT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3273 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3273 for Application #1807 Susan Marie Sumey, 1330 Cherry Place, approving a conditional use permit and variance to allow major land alterations within the lakeshore yard. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) #1810 HENRY OENERO, 1245 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3274 Mr. DeNero was present. Mabusth explained the applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit for a second story guest apartment over an attached garage that has existed for years. Because of the extensive remodeling and because of the kitchen In the guest apartment, the applicant was required to file the application. There is a breezeway that connects the residence to a garage. The breezeway area does not connect directly to a stairs that takes you to the upper level apartment. Access is through a separate door at the exterior of the garage. The fact that this did not meet the requirement of an internal access concerned the Planning Commission. But they also noted the breezeway does not have a permanent foundation, and there is adequate area to support a guest house unit on the property. Jabbour and Goetten disagreed with the Planning Commission's find)ngs. Goetten stated to have a guest house the property must have the ability to be divided and the ^uest house survive on its own. Mabusth stated the property meets only the area standards for such. Jabbour said if this is to be considered as a guest house, it must meet all required setbacks. i kk %m- MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10. 1993 ZONING FILE #1810 - CONT. Mr. D«N«ro clarified that this garage/apartment structure has existed since 1937 and was previously used as a caretakers apartment. During the process of updating the apartment, they were told of the need for the conditional use permit. Jabbour stated he does not have a problem with the area requirement of the permit, but rather it being referred to as a guest Being called such will restrict the owner from future use of the property. Mabusth noted the resolution approves the non-rental apartment, rather than a guest house. Mayor Cal Iahan questioned the applicant’s intent for the apartment. DeNero said they may use the area for a full-time caretaker. Mayor Callahan noted several years ago, the Council decided 9^#*^ apartments were fine as long as access was through the princ pal residence. He suggested they consider their policy on guest house uses again. Qoetten noted that the unit has existed in the past. Kelley noted they have ai lowed non-conforming uses in the past when the structure has existed prior to zoning code standards. Jabbour disagreed with the Planning Commission's reference to the structure as a guest house as this will prohibit future development of the property. He agreed with the Mayor that they should re­ consider their policy. Kelley questioned whether conditional use permit if rented. they have the power to revoke the it is determined the area is being Mabusth indicated that Is always a condition of approval. It was moved by Mayor Callahjin, seconded by Goetten, to Adopt Resolution #3274 for Appilcatlon #1810 Henry DeNero, 1245 Sixth Avenue North, approving a conditional use permit for a legal non- conforming, grandfathered, non-rental apartment, and directing the Planning Commission to review the non-rental guest apartment ordinance. Ayes 5, nays 0. tr % P <iL *: MINUTES or A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10. 1993 (*«7) §1812 THOMAS PATRICK GOODYEAR, 712 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION «3275 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3275 for Application #1812 Thomas Patrick Goodyear, 712 Tonkawa Road, approving a variance to allow a second story addition. Ayes 5, nays 0. (««8) #1814 THOMAS BERTHIAUME AND CHERRYL KACHENMEISTER. 3035 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3276 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3276 for Application •ISIA Thomas Berthlaume and Cherryl Kachenmelstar, 3035 Casco Point Road, approving variances to construct a second story addition to the lakeside of the residence and a grade level deck extension at the side. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•9) #1816 KENT & SUSAN SWANSON, 3229B CASCO CIRCLE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION 93282 Goetten reported her vehicle sustained $176.00 while backing out of the driveway. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3282 for Application 91816 Ken and Susan Swanson, 3229B Casco Circle, approving variances to a I low a 10’ addition to the existing attached garage and a two story family room aciition at the lakeside. Ayes 5, nays 0. (910) *1818 RUSSELL LUND ESTATE, 905 TONKAWA ROAD > CLASS III PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3277 Dario Anselmo was present to represent the estate. Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a e property locateo within the LR-lB zoning satisfies all lot standards. Ti\ere Is 11.8% the 250-500’ setback area. The Planning either adding 25,000 square feet to the possible removal of hardcover. It was also line is readjusted, it would encourage new to move closer to the lake and would be fore an average lakeshore setback situation. two lot subdivision of district. The propose! excessive hardcover in Commission considered 250-500’ setback, or added, that if the lot construction on Lot A ing the applicant into MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING MELD MAY 10, 1993 ZONING FILE #1818 - CONT. The Planning Commission recommended approval as presented, conditioned upon removal of the asphalt portion of the ramp partially located In the 0-75’ and the 75-250’ setback areas. At the meeting, the applicant voiced concern with potential erosion If the ramp Is removed. Mabusth cautioned that erosion be addressed if the ramp is to be removed. It is recommended that the antenna towe.s be removed, including the bolts for the one located in the kennel. It is recommended that the 20’ wide sewer easement be vacated, and that applicant proceed with the application prior to final approval . The shed on the lot I Ine will be removed or relocated on the developed lot. Jabbour commented that under the shoreline management regulationSf It was recommended that the entire shoreline area be considered as one zone. He felt it was best to consider hardcover in each zone, however here is a situation that is not following the norm. Qoetten put the applicants on notice that any future proposals for additional hardcover may not be approved without additional removals or tradeoff. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution •3277 for Application #1818 Russell Lund Estate. 905 Tonkawa Road, granting preliminary approval of a Class III subdivision. Ayes 5, nays 0. (••11) tlSIS GREG PETERSON, 1920 SHORELINE DRIVE - RENEWAL VARIANCE - RESOLUTION •3278 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution •3278 for Application •1819 Greg Peterson, 1920 Shoreline Drive, granting a renewal variance to construct a new residence on the property. Ayes 5, nays 0. (••12) FOREST ARMS SILTATION - INFORMATION ONLY It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to accept the information regarding the Forgst Arms si I tat ion matter. Ayes 5, nays 0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 (*»13) JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE - LAUER/ENLOW/LINDAHL - RESOLUTION #3279 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetter, to adopt Resolution #3279 approving the 1993 Joint Use Dock License to the owners of property located at 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North Shore Drive and 1406 Bohn’s Point Road. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Mayor Callahan referred to the status report submitted to the Council. There were no comments. B) Jabbour noted at the last meeting he casually suggested they consider dedicating the Council Chambers to Brad VanNess, former Mayor, and felt it should be done prior to the Open House. Hurr asked if they have ever considered a dedication to ail leadeis of the Community, perhaps recorded on the bricks. Jabbour said he feit Brad stood fast to a way of life that they are enjoying today and for years to come. Goetten felt Brad Is worthy of the dedication, but that should not preclude dedication to others. C) Kelley said he is concerned that the sewer pond property will not be retained by the City as open space. He felt land, in the City of Orono’s name may be a rare commodity in the future, and the City should retain what it currently owns. He felt they may P0Y0P p0 able to obtain or afford additional park land within the City. Jabbour noted they are only looking to sell 5 acres of the 37. Kelley stated his position is that they should not sell any of the property and It should be saved for future generations of Orono. ENGINEER’S REPORT (•14) BIKE TRAIL - OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD Dick Flint and Lili McMillan were present to represent Commission. the Park Cook reviewed the location and design of the trail. Mayor Callahan inquired if they will also lose trees in a comparable fashion as south of Highway 12 along Old Crystal Bay Road. r ’i V -, MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 BIKE TRAIL - CONT. Cook noted primarily they will lose brush Hurr noted during the tour there was discussion about If the curb and gutter is necessary, why not move the trail further off the road and place the plantings on orivate property. Cook stated there Is only one location of the trail which is narrower. Hurr said she would support the trail being moved further from the road whenever possible. Jabbour requested the plans and specifications Include all trees to be removed north of Silver View. He felt they should condition Approval on appropriata rapiacamants baiPQ Idantifladp and such replacements are the responsIbl11ty of Hennepin Parks. He felt they should not go out of their way to get an easement to plant trees. He said ail issues should bo presented to residents along the trail and the residents should be kept Informed of progress. Qoetten pointed out she was very concerned about several residents protest, and indicated the Council values their concerns. She suggested postponing a decision for two weeks to allow time to meet residents on the site to address concerns. Hurr felt they could still deal with the residents’ concerns if the project Is approved as the bike path Is totally on the right-of- way. Kelley said he is in favor of the project, but does not want the trees to be removed and replaced with nothing. He said before he will approve the project, he would I ike to see a landscape plan for every location where trees are to be removed and replaced. Qoetten agreed. Cook indicated the trees will be planted by Hennepin Parks and wi11 not be a part of the bid document. Qoetten stressed the Importance of discussing the issue with the residents. Jabbour stated he would like to know what Hennepin Parks Intends to provide. He said the City should reserve funds in case the City needs to plant additional trees. a r; MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 BIKE TRAIL - CONT. Kelley said he would like to have a commitment from Hennepin Parks that the trees will be planted this fall. Flint said the Park Conwnisslon feels it will take much longer than two weeks to do the plan including the trees* in part because there is only 2’ available in which to plant trees. That is not enough room to plant trees in and the City wiI I have to work with every property along the trail. He proposed they stake out the entire trail and then write a letter to everyone requesting a meeting to work with them regarding replantings. Goetten understood that the Si Iver View area is where the residents had real concerns. She agreed that the entire process would take longer, but urged the Park Commission to begin the process with the that owners Immediately as they have not heard from anyone. Hurr agreed that they need to talk to everyone along the traiI. Kelley felt the leverage was now. He said he did not want to commit to the project until he was aware of the entire scope of It. Jabbour questioned the contract with Hennepin Parks. Flint stated the drafting errors Included in the contract have not been corrected. Cook noted at any time the bids can be rejected. Mayor Callahan clarified that the Council is unwilling to approve the bids until they are satisfied with the landscaping and the trees. All members agreed. He agreed that .ending the bids out does not commit to anything. Hurr agreed and felt they should begin the process. Cook stated it would be six weeks before they would be ready to approve the bids. Hurr felt that residents would.stlll have time for Input and would not feel os though the project has been finalized. Moorse asked how the project would be funded. Mayor Callahan stated the expected source of funds was the highway funds. V* •I-' . MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10. 1993 BIKE TRAIL - CONT. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to authorize the staff to let the bids for the project, and during the interim direc.ed the Park Commission to contact all abutting property owners regarding the screening and report back to the Council on this prior to accepting the bids. Hurr agreed that it would take the full six weeks to meet with the residents to discuss the replanting types. Goetten stated her concern was that there has been plenty of time to have gotten ail this done prior to this point. She said she is concerned with making a deal prior to talking with the residents. Mayor Callahan requested a repw.'t the next meeting on the discussion with the residents at the corner of Silver View. He noted he Is also concerned with the property at the corner of Watertown and Old Crystal Bay Road. He thought It would be useful to the property to have the bike path and retain some natural screening. He asked for a report regarding this property. Gerhardson Indicated staff has discussed the possIbI I 111es wlth the owner. Kelley understood that the portion along the Dickey property would not be cu»*bed. He hoped wherever the trail deviates from the right- of-way that curbs would not be constructed and It be left as rural as possible. Ccok replied that they would request bids on both ways. Jabbour added curbing is required to use MSA funds. Vote: Ayes 3, nays 2. Kelley and Goetten voted nay. Motion carried (•15) WEST HENNEPIN PIONEER MUSEUM PRESENTATION Marge Gasch was present to reiterate her concerns regarding the preservation of the old Town Hal«. Marie Gorman, past president of West Hennepin Pioneer Museum, ,and Earl Taylor were also present. She requested preliminary approval of the preservatIon. She reported this building Is one of four buildings that have any preservation value left in Orono. She referred to the article about the Town Hall and Cecil Clyde Gideon. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 WEST HENNEPIN PIONEER MUSEUM - CONT. Gasch said after meetings with staff, they have developed a plat map indicating a location for the Town Hall building to be moved to, a proposal to move the building, a consideration of the Lion’s Club to fund the foundation for the building, and a landscape plan. She said the proposed location has been chosen because it would be filled with history about the City, and the proximity to the school to enable the children to use the facility. She suggested it be used only in the spring, summer and fall, and not be heated in any way. Hurr asked if the inside would be restored. Gasch said that would be done. She said the City of Independence has preserved their old Town Hal I, and Earl Taylor wlI I speak to that. Goetten indicated the neighbors have requested the building remain at the original site. Gasch stated their main reason for moving the building is to locate it near the school. Goetten said there is not much dry buHdabie area at this site. Gasch noted It is very isolated where it Is currently located, but that may be a possibility. Mayor Callahan said ho has not made up his mind on the subject, but has a tendency to leave thb building where It is. He Indicated If the area at Crystal Bay »s left as open space, the building marks the center of the City, and he felt it seems appropriate to leave It there. He Indicated he would like to finish the new facility area prior to moving in additional buildinps. Several people have come forward with suggestions. Including the building used as a post office. He felt there »s no rush to decide, but appreciated the time put into the project. Jabbour fe.t the building has a substantial historical significance, and should be preserved for historical purposes. theEarl Taylor explained the museum association leased Independence City Hall for $1.00, and the City of Independence Is responsible for the liability and maintenance. The museum is i*^spons Ible for security, heating and coo ling. 3" '•?X i‘r •■I--- HIHUTbS OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 ■k- p-. k }■ k'g.-m I*u k' WEST HENNEPIN PIONEER MUSEUM - CONT. Hurr said she would be willing to work with Gasch on options. She felt there may be some merits for leaving the bwllding at Its current site. Mayor Callahan appointed Hurr to work with Gasch on this matter. (•10) PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS Mayor Callahan announced the ordinance will be changed to reflect three year, staggered terms. The Planning Commission members are to serve for the time appointed or at the discretion of Council. The appo tments are as follows: One year terms - Mr. Lindquist and Mrs. Berg Two year terms - Mr. Noland and Mrs. Smith Three year terms - Stephen Peterson, Charles Schroeder and Candace Rowlette Planning Commission Chair - Charles Schroeder Planning Commission Vice Chair - Stephen Peterson Mayor Callahan felt there should be a statement in the P/**^^** section indicating It is the Intention of the Council terms of the Planning Commission members are revolving after a maximum of two terms. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to approve the language amending Section 2.50 and 2.51 as submitted, and staff to draft the appropriate ordinahce, and appoint the persons to toe terms as indicated. Hurr suggested the language be changed to read Planning Commission members ere el lowed to serve the Initial term plus <«<>Jh^e-year terms. She requested an amendment to the motion reflecting th s language. Kelley seconded that amendment. Vote on the amendment: Ayes 3,,nays 2. Goetten and Mayor Callahan voted nay. Motion carried. Vote on the appointments to serve up to 9 years: Ayes 5. nays 0. motion carried. #vi MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - CONT. Goetten stated one reason people are appointed to the Planning Commission is that the Cojncil hopes that some day they will become a member of the Council. She felt six years was long enough. (#17) POST OFFICE LEASE It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, Post Office lease as presented. Ayes 5, nays 0. to adopt the (#18) APPOINTMENTS TO THE NORTH TONKA CRIME PREVENTION COALITION It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to appoint Steve Sullivan and Barbara Peterson to the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#19) ESTABLISHMENT OF WORK SESSION TO REVIEW COUNTY ROAD 15 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPT PLAN Mayor Callahan suggested the plan be presented at a regular Counci I meeting so the public can hear what is proposed. All members agreed to have a presentation at the beginning of the next Council meeting. («#20) STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT APPEALS: CHARLES BALQAARD, 3435 EASTLAKE STREET - RESOLUTION #3280 GREGORY EHALT, 105 CYGNET PLACE - RESOLUTION #3281 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3280 amending the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer assessment roll - reduction of principal amount of assessment for property located at 3435 East lake Street. Ayes 5, nays 0. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution ♦3281 amending the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer assessment roll - reduction of principal amount of assessment for property located at 85 Cygnet Place. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#21) LAKE ACCESS MONITORING APPROVAL DNR Mayor Callahan noted the agreement states "all accesses In the City" and questioned how many there are in Orono. Gerhardson stated there are two public access fon boat launching in Orono. They are requesting to use only the access off Loma Linda. J k . [ r fr MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING MELD MAY 10. 1993 LAKE ACCESS MONITORING APPROVAL DNR - CONT. It was movad by Hurr, sacondad by Jabbour, to approva the Right of Entry Permit with the DNR to access any public access that are used 11$ $ launch in the City. Ayes 5, nays 0. Mayor Callahan requested staff to provide a list of all public accesses administered by the City. (*•22) PAY REQUEST NO. 2 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS - FURNITURE It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to authorize Payment NO. 2 City facilities furniture for general office products. Ayes 5. nays 0. (#23) GOOSE CAPTURE AND RELOCATION PROGRAM Moorse explained this was a four year contract with the University. The Council Is asked to either continue the program or draft a new contract. Mayor Callahan felt the Interested parties should present a contract prior to approval. Hurr felt that If this program Is offered to one neighborhood association. It ought to be available to all associations. Kelley felt that If the City expends funds for goose removal, the City should also expend additional funds for other programs such as snow removal. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to deny the request to participate for a fifth year with the goose removal program for Pheasant Lawn. Ayes 5, nays 0. (••23A) TEMPORARY PARKS HELPERS - TIM HULTMAN A DAVID MAY It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten. to authorize the employment of Tim Huitman as a Temporary Parks Helper at an hourly rate of $6.00 effective May 12, 1993. Ayes 5, .lays 0. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to authorize the employment of David May as a Temporary Parks Helper at an hourly rate of $6.00 effective May 12, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. i#r ‘•V i.('- ' -•'. i's- ■% ^•<; ‘ V ! :f‘^ MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 10, 1993 («»24) LICENSES It Mas movad by Jabbour, saconded by Goat tan, to approva tha folloMing Iicansas: Saptic Systam Installar: Barfknacht Excavating Garbaga Haulars: wastonka Sanitation Mood I aka Sanitary Sarvice Inc. Special Event Permit: American Heart Association MN Affiliate Ayes 5, nays 0. (••25) BILLS It Mas movad by Jabbour, seconded by Goattan, to approva payment of tha Ail Funds Account. Ayes 5, nay 0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Callahan adjourned tha regular Orono City Council at 10:35 0 • Itfl • ATTi 5T: alI in, City Clark Planr.ir.c Corjnissicn Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE 93 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please P.ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) - SA/ky.ML^ r> ^'d^L_____________ 2 V ^ (L£rvciji 3o^l) \Sl3 U A 77'V / "3 3 j C /\ f f, w t}:. jc^r: TiJT^thL'PJ^ 9. / 7 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19._____________________________ •• 20. AOmDA FOR COOMCZL NUTZHO sit for MONDAY, MAY 10, 1993, 8x00 P.N. OROMO COmiCZL CSAMBIRS, 2780 KILLIY PARKNAY, ORONO, NIMMISOTA (*)Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* MAY 1 0 1993 2. WeCAN Presentation to Council - LaDean McWilliaii^||^JJl APPROVAL OF imiUTIS* 3. Regular Meeting of April 26, 1993 PARK coioasszoif COMIBITS PLAWZMO C0IMII8810M COIOODITS - Jeffrey Johnson Representative PUBLIC C0MCBlfT8 - (Liait 5 Minutaa Per Person) lOimiO A0MZiri8TRAT0R* 8 RBPORT 4 ** APPLZCA1IT8 **Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials 4. #1806 Jon & Shirley Billigmeier, 2935 Farview Lane - Variances - 5. #1807 Susan Marie Sumey, 1330 Cherry Place - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolution „ -i-,. rt-o6. #1810 Henry DeNero, 1245 Sixth Avenue North - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution « ^ .7. #1812 Thomas Patrick Goodyear, 712 Tonkawa Road - Variances - 8. Sieii'rhiSnas Berthiaume and Cherryl Kachenmeister, 3035 Casco Point Road - Variances - Resolution 9. #1816 Kent and Susan Swanson, 3229B Casco Circle - Variances Resolution , , . . « • •10. #Russell Lund Estate, 905 Tonkawa Road - Preliminary Subdivision - <^2^^ 1^2.819 Greg Peterson, 1920 Shoreline Drive - Renewal Variance Resolution . « ,*12. Forest Arms Siltation - Information Only *13. Joint Use Dock License - Lauer/Enlow/Lindahl KAYOR/COUMCZL REPORT BNBINBIR RBPORT 14. Bika Trail ■ Old Crystal Bay Road ■ L. Jl FOR COUHCIL MBSTZIIO SRT FOR MONDAY, MAY 10, 1993, 8t00 F.M. ORONO COOMCIX. CSAMBIRS, 2780 KILLIY PARXNAY, OROMO, NZMNISOTA CITY AONHIZ8TRATOR* 8 R8F0RT 15. West Hennepin Pioneer Museum Presentation 16. Planning Commission i^pointments 17. Post Office Lease ^ ^lAuliiMBtttthtitiiefits to the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition 19. Establishment of Wozk Session to Review County Road 15 Safety ZRiproveiiients Concept Planc.20. Stubbs Bay Assessment Appeals Balgaard, 3435 Eastlake - Resolution Ehalt, lOS Cygnet Place - Resolution 21. Lake Access Monitoring Approval DNR 22. Pay Request No. 2 General Office Products - Furniture 23. Goose Capture and Relocation Program 23A. Temporary Parks Helpers ~ Tim Hultman k David May CITY ATTORMBY'S REPORT LZCBMBB8 (24*) BILLS (25*) AOJOOR] INFORMATION ITEMS INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET UPCOMZMO Z88UB8 AMD BVBMT8 05/06 - Council Work Session 3:30 p.ra. - Highway 12 Mediator 05/08 - Orono Clean Dp Day - Saturday 0:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. 05/10 - Council meeting 7:30 p.ra. 05/17 - Planning Commission 7:00 p.ra. 05/10 - Highway 12 Policy Committee Meeting 5*.30-7:30 p.m. Orono Council CliAinbcrs 05/10 - School Board Election Day - No Public Meetings Until 0:01 p.m. 05/24 - Council meeting - 7:30 p.m. 05/31 - Monday Holiday - Memorial Day Observance 06/01 - Park Tour 6 p.m. 06/01 - Park Commission 7:15 p.m. •I .1 ^ I II li: ' I •! < I I I.. iliil •n ; I » l» /fidTHll/iVf? iSlUi'i'-'!' i • ^ l'' |li' 1^11 siimmsiHi ivw 11 ?o<» ;o o (I H <» »i « » « HOMO • M so M ft c cft o rt ^ M- M H- 5 O H O a 9iQ 9 mOMH mH mH MD.M0M3Ma as ♦ »-* w M' o M- c rr r»I » J» 3 01 »-4 9 O H ‘O 3 a ft tn »a § ^ O M H a 2 M M a hkcom 3 (I ft 0» 01 H- O M- rt ft 0> O H (0 M ft P O M ID H 01 O V< E la M ft c > H D D-TJ » O H 0 ft 0 rr ^ 9 H 9* .5 M a H 'g 5* H(I 2 *< • • g-8-g.. S^* H ft M fD f O » !? 3 M?; o o » n 01 y X 3 H (• M _ -5-^0 *2.JSH O. g H- n H *• tr» r— H H H r»*0 »»01 Hi 0 £l<* CH* 9^ pi (I 9 <» 10 ^ ^ O HI 0 01 0 H H M lO_ S <• n Q. 5 p,*> o* g'^0 O ^ O c ^ tt»3 cr S' H ^U ft 1^, ft pr ^ H g S M T W T r S I 2 3 4 S 6 7 t 9 10 tl 12 13 14 15 16 17 It 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 21 29 30 S M 1993 MAY T W T F 12 3 4 6 7 t 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 II 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 21 29 30 S 5 12 19 26 Sunday j Monday i Tuesday Wednesday | Thursday i Friday Saturday i ( 1 1 5 T SOB •CoMol W<wk SnuM-KliTnO 1 •9i«a4:)Bpa 2 i - ----- 4 3 ! ! 4 ' •pMkCoMwmM* T 6 1 30y •Comma Wort MiSa'^ 7 1 ’ i Oaf 10 II 12 13 14 IS *Al«B4PHN'«0ir 16 17 It Hriwt Imi4 EIk 19 20 21 22 •NMmU-'jMmMt 23 24 •C«McaM«7:30pB 23 26 1 r 2S 29 30 31 niMBMaiOv May S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 3 6 7 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 It 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2t 29 30 31 wy S M T W T P S 1993 4 S 4 7 1 9 10 1 II ^ e II 12 13 14 IS 14 17 JUNE II If 20 21 22 23 24 2S 24 27 21 29 30 31 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Salunloy 1 •M Crw—Hiini Mn 7:15 pa •Fat Tom 6:00 pa 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 II 12 t3 14 «CoMca 7:30 pm IS 16 17 IS 19 20 •FaOitrt Day IrOi. 21 Comas isaoa 7.<Mfpm 22 23 24 25 26 27 2S •CMKaM«T:J0y« 29 30 IL fe. '> -• HAY 1 0 1993 MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEET I flUf OFOiJM® HELD APRIL 26, 1993 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the fol low»ng members present: Mayor Edward Callahan, CounciImembers J. Oiann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, Charles Kelley and JoEllen Hurr. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, loning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, City Engineer Glenn Cook, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Kelley added Item #16. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be Included in the minutes in their respective numerical order. Mayor Callahan read the resolutions proclaiming Older Americans Month and a resolution proclaiming Westonka Senior Center Week May 3-7. He congratulated the Westonka Senior Center and the Tamarack Senior Center on their recognition. Goetten noted she had recently attended an evant where both organizations were present, at which she had an enjoyable afternoon. She said she was very thankful for their many hours of service to the Community. (at2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting held April 12, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Hurt reported the LMCD has funded a boating study, which Indicates usage is down from 1986 and 1987, but similar to 1984. Goetten felt that may be due to the impact of the drought. Jabbour felt it was mostly due to the colder weather last summer and economic issues. 1 ■J i .3 .hii ■c -i- .ft ‘We ONW ^rNUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 LMCD REPORT - CONT. K*ll«y asked If the study Includes a survey of users of the public access and where they came from. Hurr noted the study would Indicate within a certain mileage where users came from. «««« Jabbour reported the fishing contest was held last weekend and there were 88 boats parking on County and City streets, 21 boats In Gayles Marina, and 73 parked at North Arm landing. He presented pictures of garbage left at the landing, and felt the County should replace the garbage containers that were removed this year. He suggested the City remove the trash and bill the County. Kelley noted the Issue of garbage containers has been brought up with regard to the Maxwell Bay landing. Jabbour stated he knows there is a lot of abuse with people dumping garbage from home at public locations, but felt that It was their responsibility to provide areas for disposal at public locations. Qoetten noted this issue has been discussed at the Lake Use Committee meetings and some felt there should be containers. She said she also felt they should provide a container for the mil foil removed from boats and trailers. She suggested monitoring the situation at the landing this summer to determine how they wish to handle the situation at Maxwell Bay. Jabbour suggested providing collars on the containers not allowing larger Items to be dumped In. Hurr felt items too large would just be left next to the container. She felt they should monitor the situation of no garbage cans for one year before making i decision. Kelley suggested removing tha can for recyclables also. Hurr agreed that would be best. Mayor Callahan directed staff to contact the County to have the trash removed from the landing. juppour agreed that they should monitor the situation, and If It does not get bettor, replace garbage containers at the public landing areas. HINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 LMCO REPORT - CONT. Jabbour reported he has not received a response to his letter sent to LMCD members discussing Orono’s concerns. «««* Mayor Callahan reported at a Metropolitan Council [J® the LMCD and the statement that they are not prepared to handle boating. Hurr noted the LMCD has not approved any such agreement and she has not seen any proposals for docks. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#3) #1808 JAMES ABRAHAMSON. 4630 TONKAVIEW LANE - VARIANCE « RESOLUTION #3272 Mr. and Mrs. Abrahamson were present. Mabusth explained the applicant seeks an area variance as the residence meets all required setbacks. Hurr noted an error on Page 1 of the resolution indicating there is additional land available. Mabusth said that had been corrected. Abrahamson questioned the address. Mabusth statef the address has been changed to reflect a Tonkavlew Lane address. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution :iVri\z Tn' residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. K- r''. HINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 (•4) #1809 DANIEL AND BARBARA HOFFMAN, 1135 HERITAGE LANE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION §3273 Mr. and Mrs. Hoffman wara prasant. Mabusth axplalnad tha applicants saak satback varlancas to raconstruct thair homa which was dastroyad by fira. All lots in this davalopmant ara substandard In siza, similar to this lot. Tha naw rasldanca will ba placad at tha sama satbacks as tha formar rasidanca. Tha proposal is wall balow tha hardcovar limitations. It was movad by Qoattan, sacondad by Jabbour, to adopt Rasolution •3273 for Application 91809 Danlal and Barbara Hoffman, 1135 Haritaga Lana, approving satback varlancas to construct a naw rasldanca. Ayas 5, nays 0. (85) •1813 LEONARD NI8KA, 2304/2308 SHADYWOOO ROAD - SUBDIVISION OF PRIVATE EASEMENT - RESOLUTION 83274 Mabusth axplalnad tha original application was prasantad as an •AS#ni9nt rtqu^st In an attampt to resolva a 7** ancroachmant of tha cornar of tha rasldanca. All conditions of a previous conditional usa permit approval have bean mat. Ths Planning Commission was not comfortable with a permanent aasamant, so they strongly encouraged tha applicant to consider a lot line raarrangamant. Tha applicant and tha adjacent property owner have agreed to tha equal trading of property. Mayor Callahan asked If this Includes tha approval of tha satback variance. Mabusth stated tha approval rasolution does not address the variance nor did tha Planning Commission recommendation address tha issue of a satback variance. Staunton inquired if there was variance approval for tha construction of tha residence. Mabusth stated the residence was constructed prior to zoning standards. Jabbour felt the variance should also be addressed at this time. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by ^urr, Resolution S3274 for Application t1813 Leonard NIska, 2304/2308 Shadywood Road, for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement and setback variance. Ayes 5, nays 0. HINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 (s«6) MARINA LICENSE It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by Goattan, to accapt tha information prasantad ragarding 1993 Marina Licanse Applications. Ayas 5, nays 0. (*•7) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #3 UPDATE It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by Goattan, to accapt tha Information prasantad on the ComprahansIva Plan Amendment No. 3. Ayas 5, nays 0. («#8) CITY OF MEDINA - SHORELANO FLEXIBILITY REQUEST It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by Goattan, to direct staff to sand a brief latter to tha City of Madina and tha DNR Indicating that Orono has no problems with Madina’s request for flexibility from tha State-wide Shoraland Standards. Ayas 5, nays 0. (a»9) SHORELAND ORDINANCES UPDATE It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by Goattan, to accapt tha Information presented ragarding Shoraland Ordinances Update. Ayas 5, nays 0. ^urr reported ground water and other environmental Issues may be channeled through tha Environmental Committee, which she chairs. Kelley asked what types of issues the Environment Committee deals wi th. Hurr replied mil foil and water quality. She reported on the water quality tasting program. The Information gathered will be fed into the PCA’s computer system. Jabbour found It exciting to sea such a diversity of Interested parties In this program. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT A) Mayor Callahan expressed regret that Jeff Johnson has submitted his resignation from tha Planning Commission. B) Mayor Callahan suggested mailing or publishing the latter from the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission explaining rates. MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26. 1993 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. C) Mayor Ca11ahan reportad that the PoIicy Comm 11 tea held a meet Ing with MnOot to discuss the status of MnDot*s activities relating to the project. It was reported that a corridor selection would not be reached until mld-1995. MnDot’s representative noted the Land Use and Economic Impact Study has not even oegun, and MnDOT would hire a consultant to do so. He indicated MnDot presented a description of the bid to be sent out and Orono representatives added to that description focusing on the actual results of the development along each corridor. He noted the Mayor of Long Lake generally supported Orono's position. At the next meeting they will again review the refined specifications of the bid. Ka 11 ay askad who tha consultant is that tha Land Usa Committaa would ba hiring, and axprassad concern that it might ba a former MnOot amployaa, which would not ba In tha bast Interest of tha City. Mayor Callahan Judged tha bids would ba sent to various people and they would have soma input on tha selection. ENGINEER'S REPORT (•10) APPROVAL OF PLANS - BIKE TRAIL Mayor Callahan understood they would not proceed with this project until Council held a work session, because of tha high cost of approximately $300,000 on a trail which normally would cost much I ass. Jabbour note*; tha engineering plans are acceptable, but he would like to see ihe contract with Hennepin Parks. Kelley reiterated he would like to have some assurances that all the trees along Old Crystal Bay Road between Highway 12 and Watertown Read will not be cleared. He said he would like to see the trail staked in this area. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table this matter until a work session has been held. Cook suggested prior to the work session taking a tour of the proposed route. Mayor Callahan reported he is concerned about the curb and gutter aspect of the proposal. 6 MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 BIKE TRAIL - CONT. Flint noted the issues to be amended in the contract are f~ot substantive, and indicated the urgency to proceed with this project. A work session was scheduled for Wednesday, May 5, 1993 at 7.30 a.m. with a tour to be taken at the beginning of the session. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (•11) APPOINTMENT TO PARK COMMISSION Jabbour reported he has worked with Jim White with regard to a park on Big Island and felt White believes In Orono’s philosophy, and even tried to Impress that philosophy upon Hennepin Parks with this issue. He felt some members may feel White is too ambitious. Hurr felt White would be a negative with regard to Hennepin Parks, Kelley felt he was a bit ambitious. Goetten stated White has been very helpful to the City when dealing with Hennepin Parks, and she thought that was Important. She felt both candidates were good. Kelley noted the difference between philosophies between the City and County. Jabbour noted this Is a difficult decision because so many qualified candidates have applied. felt Orono’s Park Commission Is rather low keyed. She indicated the perception of Hennepin Parks around the lake Is negatIve. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to appoint James White to the Park Commission to expire on December 31, 1994. Ayes 3, nays 2. Hurr and Kelley voted nay. (••12) PROCLAMATION - MAY AS OLDER AMERICANS MONTH - RESOLUTION •3275 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten to adopt Resolution •3275 proclaiming Older Americans Month. Ayes 5, nays 0. i • V I m C”r- 1^’ ■iff MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26» 1993 (••13) PROCLAMATION - WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER WEEK, MAY 3-7, 1993 - RESOLUTION 93276 H movwd by Jftbbour, seconded by Go9tt#n, to Adopt R*solutlon 93276 procl9lmln9 WAStonkA Sanlor ContAr WaaK May 3-7, 1993. AyAS 5, nA>A 0. (A914) SALARY REVIEW - LIN VEE DEPUTY CLERK It WAS movAd by JAPbour, sACondAd by GoAttAn, to Adjust Lin Vaa’s LavaI to 4, StAP IV ($12.683/hr) AffActivA April 23, 1993. AyAS 5, nsys 0. (•916) BOARD OF REVIEW - THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 1993 H WAS iBOVAd by JAbbour, sAcondsd by GoAttsn, to Accopt thA InforiAAtI on prosAntAd rAgArdIng thA BoArd of RavIaw. AyAS 5, ha/s 0. («916) ESTABLISH A WORK SESSION TO REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS It WAS lAOVAd by JAbbour, SACondAd by (k>AttAn, to schAdulA a work SASSion to rAvlAw PlAnning Commission Appliesnts for Thursdsy, April 29 At 7:30 A.m. Ayss 5, nAys 0. (917) ESTABLISH A WORK SESSION TO MEET WITH THE HIGHWAY 12 MEDIATOR A work SASSion to msst with ths Hlghwsy 12 msdlstor was schsdulAd for Thursdsy, Msy 6, 1993 At 3;30 p.m. («918) LICENSES It WAS movAd by JAbbour, sscondsd by QoAttAn, to ApprovA following licAnsAs: thA SAptlc SystAm InstAllors:HAyAs ExcAVAting McCArty WAtAr A WAStA GArbAgA HAulArs:BlAckowlAk A Son SAnItAtlon Rolloff SArvICA ClAAnwAy SAnItAtlon, Inc. AyAS S, nsys 0. 8 V ‘ % MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 26, 1993 (M19) BILLS It was movad by Jabbour. of tha A11 Funds Account sacondad by Goat tan. to approva paymant Ayas 5, nay 0. ADJOURNMENT It was movad by Jabbour, sacondad by ragular Orono City Council at 8:26 p.m. Goattan, to adjourn tha Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal I in. City Clark H vV* ♦ »■ TO: DATE: Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse FROM: Stephen Weekman, On-Site Systems Manager keim may 1 0 1993 OIYOFOMM May 3, 1993 SUBJECT: #1806 John and Shirley Billigineier. 2935 Farview Lane - Variances t1. -OnUnai Seetkm 10.03, Subd. 14 (D) • Setbacks for accessory structures. A tennis court 60’xl20 ’ to be located within front yard and to be placed in front of the principal structure. A. Front setback variance Retpiired » 50’ Proposed « 17’ Variance * 33 ’ or 60% Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) A. Stiuenire is also located 33 ’ in front of the principal structure requiring variance approval. Dcacriptioo of Request The propose the installation of a 60’xl20 ’ tennis court to be kx^ in the northwest comer of the property. This structure will be located 17’ frorn the street side lot line, 33 ’ from the west side lot line, and will also be placed in from of the principal structure located at die required 50’ setback. 1 tennis court behind the from line of the principal structure would require extensive land alteration and tree removal which would severely reduce the buffer between the applicants' home and the residence to the immediate south. The variance, if approved, would be the first request for a non-lakeshote lot owner or lakeshore lot owner to insuU an accessory stnicture within the street yard. The proposed improvemern does not appear to be consu'ent with the current pattern of developrnem within the Farview neighborhood. Due the proximity of the proposed tennis court to the alternate drainfield site, the applicants were asked to provide additional soil testing information to im^te that the 20’ required setback could be maintained. Soil testing has been supplied which indicates a trench ' •ji' Zoning File #1806 May 3. 1993 Pafa2 \ system couW be installed which meet the nqaind 20’ setback if the tennis court i located 12* from the front side lot line. Due to the sloping topography near the proposed future drainfield site and the applicants* request to locate the tenr?' court 17 ’ from the front side lot line, a retainiitt wall wUl be required between the icnnis court and the alternate drainfield site in order to direct drainage away from the treatment area. Staff wUI require a grading and draining piM ^ gn 2 clearly alternate drainfield site prior to the issuance of a building permit. Please review Planning Commission memo and exhibits for further information. The Planning Commission voted 5 for and 0 against approval of a 33* street setback variance and allowing the accessory structure to be placed in from of the principal structure and that no outtide lighting would be allowed. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 9 (D) AND 14 (D) FILE #1800 WHEREAS, Jon and Shirley BUligmeier (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the propeity located at 2935 Farview Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 9. Block I. Farview, Hennepin County, Miunwott (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 9 (D) and 14 (D) to permit the consmictioo of a tennis court to be located 17 ’ from the street lot line where a 50’ setback b required and to be placed in front of the piincipal structure where no such encroachment b allowed. Minnesota: 1. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS Thb application was reviewed as Zoning File #1806. The property is located in the LR-IA, Zoning Dbtrict. The Orono Planning Commission revbwed thb application on April 19, 1993, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based on the foilowiiig findings: A The applicants' lot is limited by sloping topography as elevations to the rear of the residence drop off steeply which would require excessive amounts of fdl to provide a stable base for the court. Page 1 of 5 5. B C. The femovtl of mature trees on this steeply sloping land to the rear of the residence would eliminate the buffer from the residence on Lot 8 to the immediate south. Spiuce tiees immediately noith of the proposed tennis court location minimiyg impacting the surrounding neighborhood to the ncMth, east, and west. No outside lighting may be used for this tennis court. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and lecommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applkanls and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfue of die coauminity. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect trafHc conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the appUcanu, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; b necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would te in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and M • r CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City CouncU hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivbions 9 (D) and 14 to permit the construction of a teunb court to be located 17’ from the street lot line and 33 in front of the front line of the residence, subject to the following conditions: 1 The appHcant b required to submit a grading and drainage plan as well as clearly fence off the future drainfield site prior to the bsuance of a building permit. Page 2 of 5 f' . r - ^. a=V-. 2.The site topognphy limitatioiis will require a retaining wall between the tennis court *«<t the future drainfield site in order to better direct drainage away fronn the drainfield she. 3.‘Mr______lea grinled by this resolution run with the property not with the applicanis, but ate permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (May 10. 1994). Violation of or non-conqdiance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically tgfmitiafy sny authority graiued herein, and shall be punishable as a mr' • H M • I r 5.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors ai^ assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City CouncU on this l(Xb day of May. 1993 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 ------ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instnunenl was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May. 1993, by Edwaid I. Callahan, Jr. Sl Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor A City Clerk of the City of Orooo, a Minnesoa munkqMl corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 # . TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:March 11, 1993 SUBJECT: #1806 Jon and Shirley Billigmeier, 2935 Farview Lane - Variances Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03. Subd. 14 (D) - Setbacks for accessory structures Tennis Court at 60’xl20’ to be located within front yard and to be placed in front of the princioal structure. Front setback variance Required » 50’ Proposed » 12’ Variance = 38’ or 76% B Structure is also located 38’ in front of the principal structure requinng variance approval. Side setback Required = 30’ Proposed * 30’ No variance required Rear setback Required = 30’ Proposed * 90’ + Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) Lot coverage is not applicable as property exceeds 1.99 acres in area. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 Review of hardcover within 500-1,000’ 500-1,000’ setback area * 87,120 s.f. Allowed = 30,492 s.f. or 35% Existing = 12,179 s.f. or 14% Proposed * 19.379 s.f. or 22.2% No hardcover variance required Zoning File #1806 March 11. 1993 Page 2 List nt Exhibits A • Application B - Plat Map C • Property Owners List D • Hardcover Survey E • 1-2 Hardcover Map/Worksheet F - Topographic Map Lot 9, Farview G - Survey/Proposed Site Plan H - Weckman Memo 3/9/93 i Aerial Map J - Site Evaluation DescripUoo of Request Applicants propose the installation of a 60’xl20' tennis court to be located in the northwest corner of the property. The structure will be set 12’ from the street side lot line,.30* from the west side !o: line, and wUl also be placed in front of the principal structure located ai the requited 50' setback. The tennis court will have a 10’ high fence a^ an asphalt base with acrylic surfacing. Review Exhibit I. The principal structure on Lot 8 to the immediate west is located to the very rear of the property. It is staffs understanding that the owners of IxM 8 have no problem with the proposed location of the accessory structure. Staff has not received any written comments from this property owner The City has received no comments from the leowners ’ association regarding this request.IJ M From a comprehensive review of the aerial of the neighborhood, it wouI<i appear that this would be the first request for a non-lakeshote lot owner or lakeshore lot *ncr to instil an accessory struc tu re within the street yard. The proposed improvement wuu.^j not be consistent with the current pattern of development within the Farview neighborhood. The applkartts were a|y> advised to review the covenants for Farview to determine if the accessory structure is allowed within a street yard. The City’s ordinance would require setback variances for the structure ’s encroachment imo the required front yard and for the placement in front of the front line of the principal structure. Due to the proximity of the proposed tennis court to the alternate drainfield site, the applicant was asked to provide additional soil testing information showing that the 20 required setback could be maintaine d. Soil testing has been supplied by Mark Grooberg confining that a trench system could be installed which would meet the requited 20 from the tennis court if its location is 12’ from the front side lot line. The existing coniferous buffer would rot require removal or trimming in order to achieve this setback, but is necessary to maintain the setback to the alternate drainfield site. The tc^iography of the site will require a retaining wall betwren the t^nnU court and the alternate drainfield site to direct drainage away from tte drainfield site. Staff will require a grading and drainage plan with the alternate drainfield site clearly staked prior to the issuance of a building permit. r" Zoning File #1806 March 11, 1993 Page 3 Description of Hardships Review Exhibit A. Applicants note that structure must be placed at 12 ’ street setback in order to take advantage of the more gentle sloped topography . As you move further south, there is an immediate drop at the 970 elevation. If court was to be placed at the 50 ’ setback, the structure would not only encroach the future alternate drainfield site but would require excessive amounts of fill to provide a stable base for the court. To place at the 50 ’ setback would require the removal of the more manire trees that now shield or buffer property from residence on Lot 8 to the immediate south. Applicants also ask that Planning Commission members upon visitii^ the site, note how the spruce trees enclose the proposed location of the teiuiis court minimizing any impact upon the surrounding neighborhood to north, east and west. Issues fw Consideration 1.Applipants have noted that the existing mature spruces provide a natural buffer minimizing impact of court in street yard. What conditions in the use of court or design features would also minimize impact: a. hours of use b. no outside lighting c use of sunshield/covers on fencing d. color of fencing e. other. 2.What impact will the placement of this accessory structure in a street yard have on the existing neighborhood? Consider plantings, topographies, curvature of road, placement of houses on adjacent lots, etc. If a recommendation of approval is proposed, staff recommends that one of the conditions of approval be that no outdoor lighting be allowed. i \ ■ t L- CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICA •i L"- Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address rT7> iir nrjr^n I A Ifwt ( a i 7r,Aa wfv'Vfc v w w ’“urri rrvV a iiTwif Tf * k. f?c:a I w* • V' » - r a » a V 4 ^ O'" ^ ^^4ww'a iwa law.’ •i • f Vvw./ a Property Identif. Number (P.l.D.) ^ y Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey Date Property Acquired_ _ _ _^/^T^ (month/ycar) I (do)Cd^notj^also cwn ' " ' Present use of property Zoning District» residential other(specify) APPLICANT Name^v'^*'* Phone (hone) ~ (work) City* OWNER (if different than Name applicant)Phone (home) Phone (work) Address*e CitVI' Zit>» DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request^n Estimated detail: Construction Coat $ VARIANCES RBQOIRED Lot Area Lot Width *^etback: Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) [IP/t>B8CRIPTI0H OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual p^^erty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered coaplete; 1. 2. Completed Application Form _ _Certified Property Owners List of ovmers within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map ^obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one .(l) copy 8*i"xll*' for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%''xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor 4 elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*j’’xll'’). 7. _As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that voor variance application is not complete if the abore Imformation has not been included. APFLICANT'S SIGHATORB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator* agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this applicati^iuand certifies that the information supplied is true and correct of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date omams sighatorb The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff* consultants* agents* Commission members* and Council members for purposes of investiga* tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ^ —I,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date f'- \ j^>plicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all schednled zeeiew meetings of the Planning ComBd.saion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. r'ljhi fas ill H'l'iiti, a ^ m ar «t ^ .5 (5) % ftt^ii \ (.’. t w «r w * mil \ i n i ; » Jb t%\ ^ •••***^ f /|S »• » JV-Miai M IT' , i • i< •.* 'M^UT'O M Mt7 j rOM STf wmumnm tt m. i' •?•■ "i; ■‘I 7*" • ■*‘**', • ‘ • V* ^ I; i •. ^ ^ i. • ■M SS-U7-0 M Mlt > i Stwr . TMVltM u TJttPSfn r I /-I s- • M p uemt mm 1 Ml SUM f t fV NENNEflM COUNTY MQMIITY INTOONAnON SVSTfH OOOPCHTY (MCtS LISTW M*ll7*fS M MMMMl rMVXIH U0 i t onsTocKOUV • i LiSUEY k MlSTOCIlms riRviiM ulONB UR£ m SSSS4 Si if-ur-» n omi . MOM Oii CtYSTAt MY M $ J N i C J MYTOM JUDSQN N MVTQN TCr TONiK sum IMO ^ mtk m sfMs tiMST m. P1ASS401 SMI 1CSi M*117*CS S4 MOi OCYSS TMVICM U . SNXStlY J iltLXSNilti SHXtiCV iXlLXQWXfi XYSS rMVXCN UM tONi LMt fii »S5« TOTAL MTCN MS OOOOS . V. . i .>1 •1 / ’Vf # ’ r I ^ • ' X:./- Vi^ • ' T '* t . * ^ ♦J ’ ■'•I ^ ♦ f’. ‘ ‘ v ^l.^'V * • .• • I CtlinrY THAT TNi TACTS MMCSCNTIO AM AN ACCUtAn MS THUI MMCSdiTATXCSi Of XNTOliUTXON AS XT AMtAHS TNXS MTi ON TM MCOSOS or THt NtlMnN COUKH 01 t .(I*0r NY KNQNLfDGC AND KLXiF * •. V * '^*’fc* • ; . ? =tfe baoKB rf\i.iU r • %.\ T\ m.4 ^ ■ V ‘ . r'< z 4 4 r'i-V s'. t, '■-V I < * 0, hardcover cxlcxjlation summar ^ ^ •»« I a • tf 1 r «D A.B.c.D.E.F. Lakeshore Setback Zone Lot Area In Zone Existing Hardcover Zn Zone Existing Hardcover Percentage (B/A)xl00 Pinal Proposed Hardcover In Zone Hardcover percentage (D/A)xl00 Allo«red Hard rover Percentage sa ^ c f «£sf 1 sf %0 75-250* 250-SOO * W A «£sf %sf \25 V A flf sf t sf \30 W 9 ^yy %35 BABPCOVM z»zmitatioiis rABDCOVER mCLODBSt — structures with roofs - Decks* seea if slatted - Sideeslks - DrlTeeeys (peved or gravel) - OeeorstlTe landscaping areas underlain by plastic sheeting •• Tops of retaining veils# rock walls - Any other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground HOAD B. ermt LACTanosg kbc olatio BS tme. 10.22, oaaoLOTion Trsit'VTi;. s: 01.t.«. f«. th. .h.r.ll.. Of boildlnga on adjacent and nearby lots. . _ _ _within 75 feet of shoreline there Bubd. 2. takeshore tewporary or perwanent structures. Vor.«u~ - «»«.«r «.«. hard couer. - 1 B—,i«tlons No trees within 75 feet of the shoreline.itioiLr:/:!r,v t:r.v.h.h ^ r»o..o a perait fron the Council. HARDCOVER CMiCULATION WORKSHEETE«i»tln< ItordcovT in loM Hou«« length width ■i 5e«fA9€ t X X X Drlvx%^xy *< *v ' -. I A- J X • f • t.f • t «f • • df • idfd ^«.f. •.f • a.f. D*ck f. L»nd»eap« •r«*a undarlaln X - X ■1 r X 2^^. ? ZCi X - y^G X JLo X yc X m s.f . a.r. s.f . j/o t> ».f.77^ ^ s.f. by plastic ^ shaatlnq f. Othac X y2, ^ * K yy m y^x-. 1 yy yy SJ- *- yyy* X X . s.f. s.f. • sf • TOTAL EXISTING HABDCOVEH IN ZONE « tslstlnf Hardctnrar % • Total Ealatlaa WardcoTtfLot Araa withia Soao 100a^ s.f.i n 100 Additional Nardcovor to bo addod In sonoi Itoai Lonath x Midth ^ m ^TOTAL S * • X X • X [y TOTAL i.r. TO DB ADDED ExlstinT Hardcovor to ba Roa»wod. if •21* Itsai Lanoth s Midth • ■Hi TOTAL 1 X X X _ • a.f. a.C. a.f. (at 0 TOTAL S.r. TO IE REMOVED Final Bardcovar Proposali (Lino (II ♦ Lino (2) -Lino Oil • a.C. s.f. s.f. s.f. (3) I ♦ _ Exlstlnf To bo Addod _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I (41 To bo RosMMTod rlaal Proposod Hardcoyort * Lino (41 a 100 - Lino (1) s.f. s.f.X 100 • ☆ • iflS . ^ • ;t‘ la.vw;: Ki® m ^V ‘*k! <•• .:> H4 ir^’j u/? r • ♦ V •\ r< / N ]•\ \ 'X ♦ \ .'/I ify4t yyy'.K:t :•'! sK • .» • I »• *1 \ .L-‘\ f* I'liwi':'-•,! si|i^;^V!ii :'*»:!-'•£ ;PMik'J Ct •- .*\ x: - ^ t U- ' 4 iJ'Jitfc'- ■/rTrr-:- ;i««is 'ipt^' > j •' w m\*W «1 ’ *1^ ■ 2T^^..5- 3&y h/V'i'sSb/ '•""V X. J» J1 c-/ of iurvey f-r Jor. H. Eilli^Tssi^r •f Lo*. U — .-necin Coun*y, Mr.r.esct^ THIS ITfM HiS 8f£N miCHOFilAlfd Certiflcata of Survoy: I horaby cartify that this is a trua and corract raprasanUtion of a s^ay of tha bounoarics of U.t 9, 31oclc 1, n:f ’p^VTd mits or oncroachiooots a Seala: 1" = 60* Oftta : 1-22-79 o : Iron Earicer Gordon R. Coffin Rag. Alvin R. Rahder Rag. So.13295 Land Sur'/eyors and Plannars Long Lake, Minnesota L’‘- y;-V-. TO:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator FROM: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:March 9, 1993 SUBJECT: Application #1806 - John Billigmeier, 2935 Farview Lane, Variance - Septic Review The applicant has proposed the insullation of a tennis court on his property and the purpose of this memo is to determine whether the proposed tennis court will have an adverse impact on the existing septic system of the alternate drainfield site. Also, since the applicant’s property is within 1,000 ’ of the shoreline of Minnetonka, the existing system must be inspected to assure conformance with the current City and State codes. The soil and system designs approved by the City in 1979 indicates that both primary and alternate drainfield sites are available for this property. Site inspection reveals that the tennis court could be installed such as it would not adversely impact the alternate drainfield site if the tMMiijt court could be moved northward 10 ’, leaving a 20 ’ setback from Farview Lane. This should allow a 20 ’+ setback from the tennis court to the secondary drainfield site to the south. The existing septic system was also inspected to insure conformity to the Sute and City regulations due to a proposed intensification within the shoreland area of Lake Minn^nka. The inspmion revealed that the existing system docs meet the required vertical separation from the seasonally high water table as defined by mottling and the required setback from the DNR protected shoreland areas is met. on the above findings, suff is confident that the proposed tennis comt could te installed in such a way to avoid any adverse impact to the existing and altenuie drainfield sites. 1 a no. jroperty and the purpose ot VG an adverse impact on the the applicant ’s property is /stem must be inspected to icates that both primary' and :tion reveals that the tennis temate drainlleld site if the from Farview l^ne. This drainfield site to the south. litv to the State and City i of Lake Minnetonka. The /ertical separation from the ed setback from the DNR nnis couii coaid be installed mate drcunfield sites. 31* •a r'f •ii Sfelvc"'•: ‘-:L ifell’t V’I• • / •• V 4 - * , . 1^ ■ ' ‘ vS't, i-V '■ Pi lifu ,f Ml,:Ff' W','. ■ ? 'v-'l '■ wM's 4T i 'Gti . ’• »! 1 * * ♦ • •/ V ^\v '4SI. >'W.’ ',s * ** 4-. Sl^r: v'i^, tjT'>VS!^:a wk.«is jr'As'- N UV v^f ''Jf -* •> ‘\m ■ \ ■ * V \ ’ Sa N ! T vSJ 'm 7ki „>gr:air.j-p • • ■« ir.fte'f' :.:>sW3 *4 S' T*'"' P.‘M MMm A- ^ - b X .V .n f'iS^'M .' «>-liidT'' s J V-/0-9J srrj/cj^.^ 73^< ra T//x^r^*raf. ^ T^f ^74^^ c^4d^T-^—Tjr€r 4A( 4t4/rr Itf£4 /# -t- r/^/^ - 73f/€ ^L4.-jttrf4^Mr4 S/re ^i/f4 CAr€*^f4 rf'/r /uf4 CiJfrr . S.4/<!. . ^ ItAfS ^*//Tf C4^4 4a>i4 .4ffO^^ r4 4a/44/^// 4/t*^r<% 4ir4^*yJrS S'/rei, £Arr r/ife J>^<. 4^^//sf ^A(f//*^SA' /ta^f r4€*^e//er ^oitiJL Ayee^ee dfC/u/( i ^U4- .jTft . 4r e/r/S S^CSf//S*<, \ S/erc€AtL K / ^£4 f'I [> ■ e. X-* li Lpsatlon or Project ____ _____ Borlngo ««d«- by ^j^^f_^ollJ|orln5* TaA^ J/CL/ B-31 Doto V-/^ * "fj Cloooificotloo Sy*to«: AASBO : USDA-SCS ^ ; Unlflod_ _ _; other_ _ _ _ Autor used (cheek two): Rend . or Power_ _; Plight _ _, or Bucket X t other Dopth, In feet Boring nuaber Surface elevation 2 — 3 — 4 — - 5 — 6 — - 7 — - a — -J icjrK Ctd/t 4,r. Cl4f cr. ir. jdi^T cr. End of boring at O feet. Standing water table: Preaent at _____ feet of depth* hou*k' after boring. Not present In boring hole Mottled soli: Observed at feet of depth. Not present in boring hole _ _ _ _. Observations and coments: CJf^T Depth* In feet 1 — 2 — 3 — 5 — Boring nuaber Surface elevation 6 — 7 — 8 — it. CC4f tS4m cr, ^404-a* C4CT End of boring at 7. ^ feet. Standing water table: Present at _ _ _ _ feet of depth hours after boring. Not present In boring hole Mottled soil: Observed at feet of depth. Not present In boring hole _______ Observations end coonents: ■v. i $f:.PBI' I'' IMt To:Mayor Callahan & Orono Councilmembers Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Mix>rse. City Administrator JNGIL may l 0 1995 CnVffOMM From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator May 4. 1993 #1807 Susan Marie Sumey, 1330 Cherry Place Conditional Use/Variance - Resolution Additkmal Exhibits J Applicant’s Addendum K - Amended Land Alteration Plan Brief Reriew of AppUcation The application involves major land alterations within the lakeshore yard involving filling and grading activities to restore and prevent further erosion of the steep lakeshore ba^. The original restoration plan was reviewed by the City Engineer, Exhibit G. The original plan lacked a substruemre needed to support and sustain the layers of geo-grid fabric. The amended plan, Exhibit K, has been reviewed by Gustofson and found to meet all of the installation criteria set forth by tlK lanufacturer and as recommended by the City Engineer. The restoration project will involve no hardcover within the lakeshore yard as all the fabric and support structure will be covered with earth. Lots 1 and 2 have not been legally combined. The applicant has agreed to legally combine the two parcels. The resolution has included the required legal combination as a condition of approval. planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the amended land alteration proposal. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission approval. Please review the Planning Commission minutes of April 19th and the enclosed Planning Commission packet for more detail and background on this review. mEIW^ riiling The I plan all of inter, ic and egally I as a I land ;s and inning A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 AND A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 FILE NO. 1807 WHEREAS, Susan Marie Sumcy (hereinafter the "applicant ") is the o^^ner of the property located at 1330 Cherry Place within the City of Orono (hereiijaflci "Cit> ”) and legally describ^ as; Lots I and 2. Block 11, Saga Hills Revised according to the reoided plat thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, per Section 10 03, Subdivision 19 the applicant has made application for a conditional use permit to permit land alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards and a variance per Section 10.55. Subdivision 8 as proposed land alterations are located within the lakeshore protected area where no such alterations are allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 2. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning Fi'e #1807.. The property is located it the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. 'Hie property consists ot 27,970 s.f or .64 acres. The Orono Planning Commiss*on reviewed the application on April 19, 1993 and recommended unanimous approval of the proposed conditional use permit and variance as set forth abovj and based approval on the following findings and hardships; a.The lakeshore y;.rd consists of steep bluffs'banks Page 1 ol 4 b. c. d. Severe erosion of lakeshore bank Scouring action of waves along west bank of North Arm Severe erosion will eventually impact mature tree and strucniral improvements within lakeshore yard if condition is not remedied. The proposed land alterations within the lakeshore yard will not result in additional hardcover. All tand alterations will be above the 929.4 elevation The Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the land alterations as set forth in the amended plan will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprebensive Plan of the City. The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this prop^ are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprebensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Pased upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby giants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.53, Subdivision 8 to allow land tlfprafjnn* within the lakeshc»e protected area and grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 . • the land alterations involve land movements in of 100 cubic yards. This approval is subject to the following conditions: F age 2 of 4 5. ATTEST: Silt fence must be installed along the perimeter of the shoreline prior to any construction to protect the lake from erosion. Applicant shall file for the legal combination of Lots I and 2. This must ^ completed before the City suff can issue a land alteration permit. Applicant’s contractor must obtain a laixl alteration permit before the work can begin. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but arc permissive only arxi must be exercised by application for a land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this variance/conditional use permit will expire on that date (May 10, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolut’^'n shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of May. 1993. Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 4 ■Al %I' 'I 4 I ■1 •V STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instniment was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May, 1993, by Edward J. CaUahan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orooo, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instniment was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On day of , 199___. before me a Notary Puolic wiihinand for said County, personally appeared __________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instniment, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as u;s (their) free act and deea. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. _ day of , 199___, before me a Nottiy PublicOn this ________ withinandforsaidCouiiiy, personally appeared_________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instniment, and acknowledged rb«t be (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse. Citv Administrator FROM;Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:April 12. 1993 SUBJECT: #1807, Susan Marie Sumey, 1330 Cherry Place - Conditional Use Permit/ Variance Pntiiient Ordinances Section 10.03, Subd. 19 - Conditional use permit required for alterations within lakeshorc setback. Application involves the regrading and filling of lakeshore bank to prevent further erosion Section 10.55, Subd. 8 - Variance is required as no land alterations are allowed within the 0-75’ lakeshore protected area. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 A. Hard''over within the 0-75’ setback area Area = 11,830 s.f. Existing - 1,113 s.f or 9.4% Proposed * 1,113 s#" or 9.4% No chat ges proposed. B 75-250 ’ setback area Area = 16,100 s.f. Allowed = 4,025 s f. or 25% Existing = 6,254 s.f. or 38.8% Proposed = 6,254 s.f. or 38.8% No changes proposed. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Hardcover Facts E - Landscape Contractors Description of Improvement Project F - Profile of Fill Area and Tiered Installations of Miragrid G - Shawn Gustafson Report, City Engineer H - Information on Miragrid I - Topographic Survey y - - ---- ISv e: 1^. Zoning File #1807 April 12. 1993 Page 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes the filling of approximately 134 cubic yards of fill to stabilize major portions of the lakeshore bank that is susuining serious erosion. Major portions of the lower areas have washed downhill to lake. A 24" elm at the top of the bank will be lost if repairs are not made. In the early *80’s the neighbor to the immediate west applied for similar alterations of bank based on similar erosion problems. Roth the DNR and MCWD have been asked to review tht proposal to determine if permits will be necessary. The DNR will not require a permit review as long as all alteration are above the 929.4. As alterations are proposed between the 930 and 931.5, an MCWD permit will be lequired. Applicani has been advised of the need to file a permit application. The repair of the bank consists of cutting and filling and the installing of a geogrid fabric in tiered layen and all will be covered over with earth. The enclosed improvement will not result in any har dcover. Please review Exhibit G. Shawn Gustafson has advised that he has contacted the Miragrid manufacturer. In reviewing the proposed plan for installation, the manufacturer concurred with the City Engineer that the proposed use of the miragrid would not be to susuin the bank and that additional anchors and support system would be necessary. The engineer has recommended the following additions and changes in the current proposal: 1. 2. Fill soil must be of a granular material not clay Fill soil should be compacted no greater than at 6" lifts to minimum specified density of 95%. 3.Miragrid needs to be anchored to soil bank and suggest use of duckbill anclmrs set into soil bank and tied to a scries of pipes or bars laid parallel to shoreline. Miragrid could then be anached or wrap^ around these pipes and anchored to side slope. 4.Seeding with Crown Vetch or other quick spreading plant with good root b^. Possible use of permanent turf restoration such as miramat. Gusufson advises proposed American Excelsior Biodegradable turf is temporary and will not prevent, future erosion unless adequate vegetation is restored. 5. 6 Rip rap to prevent undermining of restored bank Silt fence installed along shoreline prior to construction > .V - .1 M 'V. '.1ir 4 Zoning File #1807 April 12. 1993 Page 3 Staff has contacted the applicant to review some of the concerns expressed in Engineer's report. Ms. Sumey advises that rip rapping exists at the shoreline except that it has been coveted up by the eroding bank. The City Engineer shall inspect the rip rap once it is uncovered. It is imperative that applicant ’s contractors not cover existing rip rap until a evaluation is made by the City. Staff realizes that the additional improvements to the original plan will result in major increases in cost. Rip rap may be upgraded at a later suge but based on potential of scouring from wave action, the bank restoration may be completely undermined if functional rip rap is not a part of the original improvement. Issues for ConsMeratl Proposed land alterations within the lakeshore yard will not result in additional hardcover. Hardcover excesses exist within the 0*75 ’ and 75-250 ’ setback. Will applicam be asked to reduce hardcover? If members find the current proposal objectional, what other methods are available for applicant to pursue to preserve her lakeshore yard. Statemr<t of Hardship 1. Lakeshore yard consists of ste^ bluffs/banks. 2. Severe erosion of lakeshore bank 3. Scouring action of waves along west bank of North Arm< 4. Severe erosion will eventually impact mature tree and structural improvements. Options of Actk Approval as proposed; or Approval as amended with conditions; or Denial CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLlCAT^xTN PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address * ' •* .1 /V '"/iyu Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name “^So. rt , hr f - s u 1 ey Address I "V ^ I >0 Phone (home) ^ I ' ^S^3 _^Phone (wor)c) 3^2'^^ ! *9_ _ _ Ovor\QCity OWNBR (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address Phone (home) Phone _ _ _ _ City _ _ _ Zip Date Property Acquired_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. mi ■‘■‘^0.0 FEES - CONDITIONAL OSB PERMITS - rrry Qfi^Qj^ _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP _ _ _ _ $125.00 Residential accessory Use Qt 250,i _ _ _ _ $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _ _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ _ _ _ $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration 1350200000 01rrfrit- r> rou s2i6330 COO I ROl Til;. \ 02/26/1 i Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, regaining walls within 75 of lalceshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application ree 1 APPLICATIONS $200.00 ■ $250.00 " $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Conurercial Siue Plan Re/iew (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoiiing (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals I w ^ ^ — — — other - see fee schedule ¥PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District - /C - ih Present Use of Property 'i( Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request ir detail: I ^ r c tv t ‘c r rr’ ji b • f 1 h jhr-C K r ^ r\ 11 / /u. y i ^ II- ' /■ <Tj ■ f 1 . - ' t, f u — / ^ Ay>fi~^arf -hrf f (Xf^S- f t ty^d i ciAf'c^^ fVK I ^ c’ / c • ^ >-' »~!/1 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Compleved Application Form -3. 5. 6. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Honnepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmer. Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan# if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application# please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. TOO ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCOKEKTS C» A WORKING COPT (ll* K 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED* The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your appl J.cation is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date . . APPLICAHT*S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application# and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature ^1/Date 9 - - - - OWNERS SIGNATURE ^ ^ The owner hereby acknowledces ard agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# commission members# and Council members for purposes of investigation and t/erification of ^hls request 0«mer ' s ration ana t^erizicarxon ox / signature ^O _ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Comiid.ssion Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting# please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Jtu*til'x'.. M.. -1^ a, H ocd !• 1 .• sn vT-'' ** 4/-^ c- 3> • 3 ----S ■ 4 (ati 9 ----------^ • v « » 1'Ji"’3i p ' qrlM*rr^i1^ -£ a rai * / / /’■ >5y 9 v#—-t*U -. 'n** S ». 'll*; r * 1?.*. * * B'C'« ri *VkA >• *i .^ga**^*—A A. . ..^ t-*3A,,..y fiA-r-tm^v fri RUN DATE 05/21/91 BATCH 002 HENNEPIN CCXJNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LISTPROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 07-117-25 000<^01595 CHERRY PL COLLEEN M HENTGES COLLEEN M HENTGES 1595 CHERRY PL MOUr^D MN 5556^PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAFtE/AODR 58 07-117-25 41 005501574 NORTH ARM DR W E SUTHERLAND ETAL WILLIAM E SUTHERLAND 1574 NO ARM DRIVE MOUTiD MN 55564PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 08-117-25 52 001401280 SPRUCE PL P J A S J SCHUELLER PAUL J A SUSAN J SCHUELLER 1280 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 55564 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 08-117-25 52 0017 01510 SPRUCE PL JOHN W WALKER JOHN W WALKER 1510 SPRUCE PLACE MOUND MN 55564 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAF^/ADOR 58 08-117-25 52 0020 01550 CHERRY PL SUSAN M SUMEY SUSAN M SUMEY 1550 CHERRY PL MOUND MN 55564 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 08-117-25 52 0025 01590 CHERRY. PL TAG BLOUNT TERRY J BLOUNT 1585 CHERRY PL 0R0T40 MN 55564 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 5 VV58 07-117-25 41 005101505 ' SPRUCE PL SANDRA L NUNEMAKER BRETT A SUSAN LARSON 1505 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 55564 58 07-117-25 41 005201576 NORTH ARM DR WILLIAM E BOWEN WILLIAM E BOWEN 40 PARK LANE MPLS MN 5541658 07-117-25 41 007801295 SPRUCE PL STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO CONVEYED2/8/82 ST DEED 161147 58 08-117-25 52 0001 01585 CHERRY PL J 0 MIKLETHUN/K MIKLETHUN JOHN D I KATHLEEN MIKLETHUN 1585 CHERRY PL MOUFR) MN 55564 r58 08-117'25 52 001501290 SPRUCE PL STATE LAND DEPT JEFFREY E PAGE 6951 1ST AVE S RICHFIELD MN 55425 58 08-117-25 52 0016 01500 SPRUCE PL F L ROACH ASA ROACH FRANK A SHIRLEY ROACH 1500 SPRUCE PLACE MOUND MN 55564 58 08-117-25 52 0018 01518 SPRUCE PL PATRICIA A GROETKEN PATRICIA A GROETKEN 1518 SPRUCE PLACE MOUND MN 55564 58 08-117-25 52 0019 01550 CHERRY PL SUSAN M SUMEY SUSAN M SUMEY 1550 CHERRY PL MOUND MN 55564 » • > 38 08-117-25 52 0021 01560 CHERRY PL WILLIAM C SINCLAIR WILLIAM C SINCLAIR 1560 CHERRY PLACE MOUND MN 55564 38 08-117-25 52 0022 ^ 01570 CHERRY PL T 0 NAFSTAD ETAL T 0 C M NAFSTAD 1570 CHERRY PLACE MOUND MN 55564 .». ft < 58 08-117-25 52 0024 01575 CHERRY PL DAVID CHADWICK ET AL SCOTT R A ELIZABETH B INGRAM 1575 CHERRY PL MOUND MN 55564 58 08-117-25 52 0025 01580 NORTH ARM DR S D SANDBERG A C B SANDBERG SCOTT D SANDBERG 1580 NORTH ARM DR HOUND MN 55564 I ;• - «. s r ‘, HARDCOVER CA.LCOUTIGN WORKSHEET SET3ACK ZONE: (ciHCLi c.NS) 7E-250' 250-E0O' 5CO-1CCO Existing HAR2(;cv£n in Zcns 12 41 •/. 2. B.3scx d a— X n.c X S. .7 F.Landscape AAEAS UNDERLAIN BY . .4 y. L. PLASTIC *) AS (iWU«3& • • LENGTH 11. 5 X WIDTH 4 • 70 • 4. -i X m |o3.Z- _ X ..a • . X 1 3. (?ARAG£o V c o •< St mm c. D rive ?/AY o 0 m G s mm s • • D. Sidewalk \i 4 ■/. 2.•Z.4 s Y . s 14.2 X 12..5 117.?.s SiF. 2.r. S.F. S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. lo^.^ ao- S'o. s X " — X • .-S>Wa ,• •• • • • s. OrwER :_ _/Tr X . ^‘^/0 » 10 .*5 • • Total K ardcoys .r • IN Zone 1,1 15 . • . . Tctal Property Area IN Zone U , Ia ni^ ^sin . X 200 = ' •• • •^-4« - F. . S.Fi , S.F. S.F. 8.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. % • • « ••J • tHARDCQVES WLCJUTION WORKSHEET SST3ACK ZONE: (ciHCLS CNS) 0-75' 250-500' 500-1000 Existing Hardjcvss im^Zcne (jt J < Zl.5 * A. ■ H ouse _______!______________— LENGTH ‘5."5 lu.c X HICTH zp. •-> lO .o a . ZZ .O ll. <■ l^.c 1. o l.L 12-3 B. Garage t-i c. D rivehaj /*.G-'I'h •=,1 .*o X X lo y. T_ - z.< d/Sid£walx t.'S’ il:__ X ‘S' *! Cc. * n.s^T7T^ii>?7 X X . cr y. t- o. *r E. V • _ X |4-.^y- X 4.0 4.0 F.L andscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . . PLASTIC sheeting $. 4 5-?. < 6 ‘A z. 6.Z.1 V. 1- 6. Othe.r o Total K ardcover in Zone • , , Total Property Area in Zone m • lO^O ‘S2..3 =s .-Z.44 se ■ a 13 • 14.o Gl'^i ■U3^J __« _ s 7 t. •»J 5*s ,-7 C, _ 1 ___^ •i-=1 . -r . s !__^ zst.l S 4'‘fe . -5: ■ 34 s m * 4.*r , s, m 30 9* Z,-70 • s. ■ • -T4.3 s. 0 8. • CZ'SD . 4- • 8.1 \G, loo S.f SIFI F. S,F. ^.F. 5.F. S.P, S.f I S.r. r I SI P • .■^j a <Cf) .f / V \ V ' M 4 B [I G,l^o.4- ^5 1 6, loo • l?*c.. 6 • ••••• • / * February 09. 1993 Landview Landscaping (612) 470-5163 3670 HWY 7 Excelsior MN 55331 To Susan Sumey 1330 Cherry PI Orono, MN 55364 (612)338-8779 Job Name/Location Installation of aoproximately 250 yards of soil with a reinforcement of Miragrid internally and Surface erosion control mat preventing superficial erosion and promote vegetation. Job Description: Measurements According to our calculations the walls face will be approximately 33’ in surface length (top to bottom) and approximately 22’ length wide and approximately 5’ deep averaged. 33 X 22 X 5 = 3630/27 = 134 cubic yards of soil to be used. 1. Soil Delivered $134 yards $0 2. Installation of approximately 134 cubic yards of soil $1280 A. Bobcat time and for one person Shoveling Tiers. 2. Installation of 5 Tiers of Mirafi Miragrid 5T every 4-5 feet in height of slope. $750 A. Soil will be compacted with Wacker as we ascend upward on each tier. B Miragrid 5t will go into dirt internally to surface and then sloped down 2' 3. Installation of American Excelsior Biodegradable turf reinforcement on the surface, ^' A. at cost $500 $100 to install total $600 B. Will be pegged over entire disturbed area. 4. Will be willing to install up to 15 shrubs Home Owner to provide 5. No Miscellaneous Benches, Walkways or Seed Blanket has been calculated or designed at this time. 6. This estimate is for Soil and Soil Support System A. We also do timber walkways. B. For This project we recomend cne year of settling before steps are installed. We request 50% of estimate to be paid when materials are delivered and 50% of estimate upon completion. Estimate Job Cost____$2630____ Home Owner_ Susan Sumey Estimate By. Stephen Spartz MlfWI MIRAGRID 5T LANDVIEW LANDSD\P1NG3B70HWY 7 EXCELSIOR. MN SriSSl PURGED EVERY 4‘H T OVERLAP AMERICAN EXCELSIOR TURF REINF. PLACED OVER DISTURBED AREA H = 2ir SLOPE 1 .' ii iii jil t!li If ■ • '2l;r iMi.t ii i i : ; 5 i i • I r ^ i » I • f 5 i I ‘ 134 YARDS FILL SOIL titis . • . t • I T’•r Iii: • 111 l“f . i i : >1 Jil ’! I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects A * ^ ' - 1 • • ^ i V ■ . •. ; V • • r - - . 4 • : -* • i \ . 4- i;- ■ ' • ■ i , ■ • m .• : . 4 ' • r . • . • 1 I J ^.4 4 *■ ■ > * r t ■ • A '■? *.V ■ 4,- • 4 , 4 V ' ^ ■ *. * C* ; 5 A . A A . - ; . * * , . f * :• * • \ i ” • M. V.’-f-; f''r » ■' - 4 y i- .. _ r i*.- - rv 4,' 4, ■ • *.* • » ^ ‘ t - . ■. V ! *■ . - -c ‘J ;■ •- *.* » . ^ t ^ ^ Pj ' i.* I *■• . . A = . . 4 :• • > t • ; 4 •’f I ^ . ' , , «-* : 'T .•.» . Jw ',.•<* ..W. ■'■ t • 4* , f rc , * F'-» .r -.'.'.r •. ■ «■' • V * « TiPR lI iSSo April 6, 1993 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Susan Sumey Shoreline Restoration File No. 139-1807 Dear Jeanne, . .r We have reviewed the proposed shoreline restoration proposal for Susan Sumey's property at 1330 Cherry '^lace in Section 8. The property is adjacent to the North Arm of Lake Minnetonka and has a seyerely eroded soil bank along the shoreline. The proposed restoration is not acceptable from an engineering standpoint, and we recommended the following modifications. silt fence must be installed along the perimeter of the shoreline prior to any construction to protect the lake from erosion. The fill soil should be a granular material. Clay soil is not recommended for this type of application. The fill soil should be compacted in no greater than 6 inch lifts to a minimum specified density of 95% of the standard proctor density. The proposed fill and Miragrid is proposed to be installed up to the existing failure plane, as shown on the detail. There is nothing shown to anchor the Miragrid into the existing soil bank. We be..ieve that future problems are likely at the same failure plane as before. We recommend using a system of duckbill anchors that are set into the^ existing soil bank and tied to a series of pipes or bars laid paraiie.. to the shoreline. The Miragrid could then be attached or wrapped around these pipes to anchor it to the side slope. The proposed American Excelsior Biodegradable turf reinforcement is a temporary turf restoration and will not prevent future erosion unless an adequate vegetation and root base has been established. Maintenance of the 1:1 slopes will not be possible. We recommend seeding the slopes with a low maintenance vegetation such as Crown Vetch. Crown Vetch is a spreading plant with a low profile and root base. There are several permanent turf restoration products available such as Miramat which will further increase the stability of the surface. If there is a possibility of scouring of the embankment due to wave action along the shoreline, we recommend the placement of riprap with jfilter fabric to prevent erosion and undermining. Paul. MM • 6t2-636-4600 •• • ^rf ■ ■'»«• I 1 I .fK m #• • m • . ■« A ■■■^' •' - ' " ^■- -mm £jl-fletatajjg^ Ife^Eniiliankl SHLandslide Repairs lUMumcrumn MIRAFimC MiraK Inc is the largMt OvolexMe marVeting company in North Amancs w^Kse business meal produdi tor Vw construction industry Mirafi dSKOlss Us resaarch, development, and manufacturing eapertise to designing pmduclilhd pitaade sedimenMion control, soil reintotc ement. subsurface dramage. during an entensive distribution network ot more than 400 outlets aeooucr MmuMmton MIRAQRID PRODUCTS Since 19631 Mirafi has developed M.iagnd products specifically to fulfiM tt-a require­ ments of soiiamtorcemenl technology Cost effecti\« reinforced soil structures can now be built, usirtg high rrxidulus high strength, creep resistant polymer geognds to meet stringent design 'n sna for performance <Mer tong service lives Miragrto can be easily irworporatad into your rtext project to irKiease useable land area, reduce saa acquisition andtor development costs, using reinforced Steep slopes, retain­ ing wa''s and aggregate rafts DESCRIPTION Miragnd is a coated biaxial geognd made of polyester yams Kni^ irtto a stable geo> metric configoralion The ^ms are bundled into machine (roM) direction strands ar>d cross machine (roBl direction strands, and spaced to pn^nde uniform, large openings approR.maMy one nch souare These aper­ tures allCMr sod to penetrate easily and form an efficienl mechanical interlock with the remtorcing gsognd. The large percentage of soil particle to particie contact with Miragnd alorig with ite ftoaibw rtatura, mal« a very eftoctiw tenaiifairtotcement tor both coh» sionless and cohesive soils ^!ac^lne Direction Strand Soil Par.c es Mcvemeni Tensile Force <6 Apolieo ViflAGPiD Cross Machine Direction Strand Passive Soil Resistance M(?biii2ed by Grio Mevement ^— Soil Shear Resistance Mcbiii^'ed ^— by Grid Movement fnt^rijck between soft and Mfragnd ft MIRAQRID DIFFERENCE ' au ' ^ Distwxt pertormance and cost saving advantages haw been irKorporat^ln Wirayld.Tt^,^^ ‘ ^ •i.'t * ' that can make a difference to your next project. AOVMITAOE8 IMragHd DHfererce • Supiairlor^Creep RaaistarKe: Miragnd’s Miraynd's polyester composition allows ili* easy to harti^ rolls, that minimiiiasw^te 1 polyester composition leads to superior that high modulus and strength througTxxjt arxJ instalalton timei The flexible nature ^ cre^'ieeistanoa ever other competitive geogrtds.'Miraorid total strain is lees than half, that of competitive products. This aflows • higher percentage of Miragrid ultimate sbangth to be used in your de­ sign. maUng it more cost effective. • Modulus and Strength: The initial modulus and strength of Miragrid make it strainpompetible with me sod struenirrt the service bfa Retaining this modulus and ^ of Miragrid allows'II to'contorm easily to strain compatibility is crvical for aesthetic • desired shapes, while rolling out flat wlth- consicerations. giving Miragnd the long out reood. Miragrid is easily inc orporated term performance difference ' into convardional earthwork corwiKtton • Lightweight ar>d Flexible: Miragrid is a ^ requiring no specialized labor or pro- lightvwight and flexibie geognd offenng cedures to Instal'Miragrid can be quickly a cost effective difference to your next cut with a razor knife atxf requires no project The product is shipped in la-ge. - • special tools or protective clothing for .. - -sK y J i •> T1 > THC uitacftto ntfoewAjrcr orf liCMCC I ’C ’iM* I ^ E t I -■ AT A*'-- .IL a: ‘f 4 4I ’ '4.'' Long Jerrrj WisJe hst aS at Prvoua Srmo^rt, *. •r j '• .-or* f erym- rew USBS/APPUCATIONS A near-vertical gravity retaining wall can be created by reinforcing soil with Miragrid. Appropriate design procedures are a'-^ilable to determine the exact number, length, and vertical spacing of Miragrid, as shown in the wall cross-section below. This assures the reinforced soil volume will function as one coherent gravity mass (block). Wall Applications: The follc^^^^g are topical applications for Miragrid reinforced soil walls: • Conventional Site Retaining Walls • Head Walls/Bridge Abutments • Crusher/Batch Plants • Stream Channelization • Waste Transfer Stations • Blast Walls • Coastal Protection/Sea Walls • Armory Bunker Walls Retaining Walls ^ DIFFERENCE - The Miragrid Difference, Walls; Overall,* Miragrid reinforced soil retaining walls offer a | 15% to_50% cost savings oyer conventional ; cast-ih-place coricrele walls between 4 feet] and 25 feet tall, depending on facing option | selected. Additionally, Miragrid offers the following advantages: -.•tj;- -r * • Utilize On-Site Fill . • i • - ’ A • Flexible Retaining Wall accommodates settlement - v, ; • \^ety of Facing Options ^ • Reduced Development Costs I'" ' • More Useable Area Create • Minimize Land Acquisition Coi^ r r » ♦»»* • , r » f •» ''' 02246/MIT BUYLINE 3760 Facing Options: There are a variety of facing options available to meet your aes ­ thetic and budgetary' requirements* • Treated Timbers • Masonry Block; Common or Architectural • Mortarless Interlocking Precast Concrete Blocks • Boulders •• * - ’ • Wrap-around Miragrid * ^ •* Construction with: •— Encapula^ed Rip-Rap — Shotcrete or — CasMn-Place Concrete Skin ; • Railroad Ties ^* • Brick nr Slone; requires Masonry Block Back-up • Precast Concrete Panels; Interlocking or Full Height .i i-Mr i ■-... : I - Vj ‘ ' • ‘****‘.V' '*'*'^* • c i ....... fk^[MBf3GrB0nAflViMfmmf9r»D9fW9rCO 12 18.5 n. Ngh w9t wtfi Kg^s$on§^ f9cing Kmssvte^ Condo umnjrrsi • C^rr^iridg^ Ort 7-24 fr f)igh MirW'jind-fWTfOfced wads with Geowiib* hx^ng GoAoria Shopcinq Cer^ • >tyX/^ 20 n htgh was with taartg U*'--x". i .V • • i • • * ( * • M t f I I I « V I _ Compoc*«d 0raino9«,Till CdfVipOC**d HO*iv« So*l 0^o>o9« CoTl«c^of* Gravity flow fo itofm to«#r •*‘V- • \ ■ j „ rL * * . .■ j: X / .‘ t-* . •. . \ ' .\'^ A •.■A 4: I ■» *' - - '• A >.• -T*'' ItwaBd UvKhcapo Ttmtor hr Mingrtd Soi mt • Gastonia NC MortandConvnon Maaorvy Bkxk Fadnghr Mirwgrtd »vk Soa WaM • ChathtlB NC , ; t r:. .. X. AW USe&APPUCATIONS Embankment slopes incorpoiating Miragrid can be built sleeper than conventional earth ­ work construction techniques normally allow (usually 2.1). Multiple layers of Miragnd laid horizontally during slope constructior. inter­ sect all potential failure planes due to th€ steepened slope. Thus providing tensile strength aiong the failure plane to increase Its overall factor c‘ safety against sliding, as shown below. Design procedures are avail ­ able to determine specific geogrid layout. t 1 .w7* • • ■ I- W ' ^^Steep Embankments : ' THE The Miragrid Difference, Slopes: Miragrid j reinforced slopes generally reduce land .i acquisition costs, provide “more useable J area at the slope crest or loe.'eliminate l retaining walls or kwver site'developrfient costs. Miragrid sfeepened slopes make a big ^ cost saving difference by effwttively soMng problems, withr^:, • Soft kxjridatJon sdUs|4'iv' ’ • Lirhited property bouhdarfei^'ir • Large earthwbrkyofumes^;/^^^^^ -ii Slope Applications: Steep embankments using Miragrid are appropriate for the j following pn>ject types: ‘ " • Highway Embankments * • Shooting Ranges • Earth Dams • Residential Developments • Mining/Mine Reclamation • Commercial/Office Parks • Landfills • Dikes and/br Levees • Stream Channelization V * MIRAGRID Soil Shearing "• Resistance Tension Maintains SiaDiiity Cumn Bmtmr PBrk • Houiton n 3a ft l;t EmOm*tmnt Mnghd lariaii f9faofC9m9nt to forf m po»tkii fmkjm 9urf9C9 AtMmrnaOonmKaon*tOngn:mnAZ 1&32ttf^ar0ofi9wah grout btglm:9 4 » 'f MoonptvAi Seopprv Csntor • MoorvSvM NC •t' ' *• . • M* ■ *lw- T ' - f . . I H •*» •. ‘ ,* » -V, •^ ^ * tSV-" ' ^ f ^ ^ f^ Jy- ' % ■V.Si-’. ■ -r ■'-.V..-.-• c C / < USES/APPUCATIONS ! ' I Landslide repair is steep embankment con- j Iruction for projects where conventional eaithwork procedures v/ere inadequate. All . steep embankment design and construction » principles outlined previously apply here. However. Miragrid has several unique fea ­ tures that aid landslide repair. • *r4 •• t* ^ » . • . . . r ' 1-• ..•■.I', r..; .. .-i, ?-r \ r^ -f^assst M: Svitan Basin Road Rastorabon • Sultan VM Mtdww through 145 ft. long si>da noair J OalfM Bu%na%a • Chartotta NC BjcmmOonotSBdaRaparan j-‘'>V-’ . !’ • I ' .I. < » I I . ' -W:i- :j Vl'U, CaU:il Businma Park • Chartotta NC Ralrtonoarnart and Fit Ptaoamart on a 14 1 $hfa wsat-w/. • b .*..k.AaiAs« ' N \b-i'V > Oakht Bustnasa Part • Chartotta NC . .. -'.A .«.n 40C ft tong ambanmart wth atoston oontot titorm . * . » .. . ■■;* • .• .■ • 1 W *•' >4^4 ♦ .* ^ . * . • “T ■ ■ * ■ ••> Landslide Repairs • - « ♦ • Y*** ♦ 5 4- mira Irid iy.^UftPIFFERENCE . • • • . ' .. * » *' .\* > 7^. ■ V . The Miragrid Difference, Landslide j Repair: Miragrid reinfqrc^ slopes makcati" attracliye__altemative to conventional solu­ tions through these time and material cost • saving features;:‘‘***'**?^‘‘*^.‘'f“**' • Miragrid Reuses soil iniheslidei simplify­ ing material handling-and eliminating . • haulage charges and purchase of select , , • Miragrid^s superiorlijulloutresistance . •' reducesjb^i^be^ mini-. v.’ mizing eocca^t^itjuahtity and reducing ] 02246/MIT BUYLINE 3760 Typical Applications: • Highway Embankments • Earth Dams • Stream Channels ' •Landfills , ~ • Dikes/Levees • Mine and Mine Reclamation .■*r •A' ’1 « jiv * V. , « *:,/V 'tl -i ‘ i »■ in.y '• mb k't- .. ^ {:m V'! . .L- ? rs}:. I SuOan Ba%in Road Restoration • SuAari IIM CooipkiaBd U fk4» County Higtma/35 • Wtight County htN •. Lardstda Hefioa givps^ (jet^ f» ■Ri»^ KiSTiNG CONCSCTE CMiST.NG C0NC»£TC. CJ«B ANO CJTTtB \ 2 5* (Ty^ ) ANC«0» •••TO E»r5Tf%ic r.’.L ST NG fl.L ’C»1AL StlCCT ST»UCTUt4L •AC»^r U MATtfAL INTCVNAL fAiC''ON angle ♦ 35 compact to 9f. Of STA n OAAO PtOCTCB DENSITY (;'Tm C-69S) iN A L •'TS os^ ftp» • mitm lypMCA/ CmsS ’SectJon at Repair , '«■ -j-.'I ■ - ■'" •• . ■ ■ -A. ...fr * 4 ‘ 1 • , •• vsis/APPUc/moNs i', “ i-t •'ii -V 4. •1 A "soo>whoe effect" is created by placing 1 Miragrid Into thin layers of compacted aggre-; gata Miragrid's tensile reinforcement allows ^ the aggregate to function as a much stiffer (rigid) layer,"spreading applied loads over a larger area. A schematic secton of ^ ^ plicalioih fe shown belowr - 5r i THE-- >^«MIR AGRID'r^^ ^ ‘ ___ ^ f the Miragrid bwerence, Raftst Mtraqrid^ i'-•S' V ^ 1 - *■» . I i typical Applications: ^ V i • Roadw^ • Foundatioris............ I MV reiii --------^---------^ reinforced aggregate rafts reduce applied 1 loads on soft,Oeanng scils.-minirpizing the j toujdatibo4ff atment required .focadequate ^ long termi)earing Jrherefore,Miragrid rafts_i can make a’ditterence when a projec t ron- skJcSs these.prd^uresi^'^^^iljl^^ •r Extensive , e>£avatioq^and, rep lacement with com^rt^fiiU:^ • Pilingijppag^. •JStohe columns.oroyna(p»^c»[npactK)n.«^ .................................................. • Sluny.Trenches *':*• . — . • , : ^ . r .. ^ iT*»—•» 1*** t • ■ %« M •I • In-Take Structures • Railroads .**V ‘ • Landfill Expansion/Capping . 9^,^^ m»f mmu9~w «««•»«.« M ■« .»»« .>«.•»" ii>.>■ <• , «-«« . • ••t-V. _•• •• ' j r-» '■ • ••••»rr“l ? "M ^ ----szeetH ----------JCX3JV t • K. ' ■•if'- 1-T4 ^11 *"T^ 1^1 u . 11 .v: i>tm '.* »•'V ' /*.•'** y*f f Firsiti# B m« l^r«oor»ry r-i <— Exiabng G«Ot0«tit9 Ogme &K FouftdMn MlRAG^iO R*«morc»rTt«ni fumtn MIRAGAIO rWwHorCfnfit logttt^ tor ki^ R miPoci Wnp Gxti—tiK Bianiit lo oomatfi iighM^gN M during p«n twom contfructson Oft (US ro;*amMcAir QoM wfion S«#p(vf Syiiirn ■ - ^ * V, -V * J. • • ‘jfr - r> v r jv ■ ‘J Fooling Pavement • MiRAGRiO aaBaxxaeaaB GeoteYTite Separaiof 8B9aSB - M T/ $■70 n$nmmr*mi.mn*a$0" OBuniy m - f'.Wv - ^ ' —’X^ -•- ' 1 • * '■X ■-jfwvri,-- >-\ " . . . ....**• »•..■- ..._j 'T- <mf ■ f .* . ESIct.- o o TECHNICAL SUPPORT GUIDEUNE SPECIFICATIONS This section shall provide all information required (or the furnishing of all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary for placenoent of soil reinforcement materials specified herein. Other sections related to this mrk. • Excavation • Embankment • Site Grading 1.0 Material Handling 4 Storaoe Upon arrival at site, the geogrid should be checked to ensure the prtyer material (strength) Is received. A product certification should be provided with each shipment stating the material conforms to the ^^uct spMificatior^ published by the suffer. ease of Installation, the material should be stored above -lO^F during winter months. Care should be taken to prevent mud. wet coment. epoxy, and like materials, which may permanently affix themselves to the gridwork. from coming in contaci with the geogrid. The rolled material may be laid flat for storage and should be covered with a light cokxed tarpaulin to prevent longterm exposure to sunlight. 2.0 Malafial SpedfVcatlona The geogrid shall be composed of polyester yarn encapsulated in a protective coating. The polyestsf 3.0 Reinforcement Placement Prior to placing the reinforcement, the excavation shall be cleaned of all excess material and the foundation base proofrolled. The reinforcement shall be rolled out. cut to length, and laid at the proper elevation, location, and orientation as shown on the contract drawings. Orientation of the reinforcement is of extreme importance since geogrids vary In strength with roll direction. The roll direction of Miraghd should be laid in the direction of main reinforcement. The contractor shall be responsible for correct orientation. , . Reir^orcement should be placed coincident with the compaction lift nearest the design elevation on the drawing. No partial or haiMift thickness are required. Geogrids can be placed directly on the existing fill surma No special surface treatment, leveling or smoothing, is reo ’ilred. If a shoepsfoot roller Is utilized, the Imprints are an acceptable I The reinforcing material should be cut to length as ! shown on the contract drawings. A razor blade. ‘ scissors.orsharpknifeareacceptablelnstruments j to cut the material. Should it be necessary to sec- ] lion a roll width, a high speed, abrasive saw or ^ vibrating knife edge works well. 4.0 Placement of Fill Over Reinforcement Control of the fill placement should be done by the starnfard method utilized for this cortiract as de-. fined in Pfojed S^ifications cx a? ^ j surface for reinforcement placement After being rolled out the reinforDni yarns shall be ioin^ ^ knitting or ultrasonic weld- inaing M evenly a^a^)unctk>n^ characteristics. gmalefial should be tensioned by hand until it is taut, free of wrinkles, and t^ng flat Overlaps as shown on the drawings should be maintained. No overlaps will be allowed in the direction of strength. A^acenl roll widths should (weriap a minimum of 4 inches. Mechanical connections be twe en acQacent rolls should be made '4 this time, if required. Certain fin properties. fiH placement pcoo^ures, andAx weather conditions may require the reinforcement to be held in place by stapl^ pins, sand bags, or till, as directed by the engineer. - MIRAGRID PHYSICAL PROPERTIES the engineer. Extreme care should be taken to ] prevent wrinkle development andAx slippage of : reinforcement during fin placement and shading. When practical, fill is to be placed in the directkxi . In which the reinforcement was rolled out, to aid ’ tensioning. However; if fill must be placed trans- j versa to die roll length direction, slight (4-Inch) ; » between rollvtidths with the top piece Of ; reinforcement being the first to receive fill, will ] prevent permanent folding of reinforcement./f- « Rubber-tired equipment is alow«d to paie over bare ) reinforcement at slow spee ds, less than 10 mph, ; ..............................raking. Ttek equipment * onto Dare reinforcement To avofo darning the reinforcernent. there must TENSILE STRENGTH & MODULUS Main Reinforcing Direction TENSION CREEP Cross- Direction Ty^e Ty^e Ty^e Tensile Strength (Ibs/ft) Peak 2% Strain Retained Modulus (ibs/ft) LTAOL after 1000 hrs 2.600 6.700 1.550 1.650 525 1,330 300 350 21.000 54.000 12.500 13.500 Long Term Allowable Design Load (LTADL) (Ibs/ft) Maximum Allowable Total Strain (ot) After 2000 hours & LTADL Main Reinforcing Cross- Direction Direction Type Type Type Type A 8 A B be a minimum of six inches of fill on top of the , reinfoicemetr^ before tracked equipment can be operated.- : ! F^ vertical walls, it wiN be required to temporivily : form the vertical lace and brace it for the horizontal loading created by compacting fill behir>d the 4 wall. Ibnsion should be maintained in the Miragrid ] until at least 70% of the grid area is covered with j fill. This locks tension Into Miragrld minimizing fadng movement lor vertical walb. The bracing and forming shall be aa shown on the oonetniction drawings or an alternate system that provides an equivalM reaction for pro^ compamn behind the well.. V f.* /. 1.050 2.700 5 5 630 5 650 5 54) Rtefment L R^ment will be based on the contract unit price per net square yard of reinforcing metofiel ptebed. This will be exclusive of overlap and wastage. Wastage directed by the en gineer wW be at me contract unit price. ^ The contract unit price shal Indude cost of me reinforcing materiel; coet of labor to handle, afore place, andciitthe reini Jng materiel; equipmem __________________ handle, afore, and place the reinforcing material; cost of excoee rekiiorcing maierid reguked for the overiape, iointe, extanslonai and end________Jsalvagee; end material and labor to furnish and kisSall etaplea, pegs, eto. to fix rein- fordng material during fill placement. I ... ■. .r-t ■ n.v 10' CALV. ST. SPIKC 3/8' 0 -------------— BE-MINIMUM 3 PER 8' timber 4.5' TREATED LANDSCAPE timbers 6'X 6' \ TREATED \ LANDSCAPE TjM,aLR. 8 PLYWOOD BATTEN 1/2 i ^ MIRAGRID COMPACTLD drainage FACING STML 10 PENNY NAIL compacted native soil RetMiO^yg MHU ftcmg Conn^ctfons MiRAGRIO hooked around f FIBERGLASS r ^CWEL FiBERCUSS —keystone " standard unit KEYSTONE WALL SYSTEMS u ragrid COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL X compacted aggregate J \ between , inside and BEHIND UNITS. -•24 -12'*^ SLOPES FROM 30* TO 45*MIRAGRID INSTALLED PARALLEL TO SLOPE FACE MIRAMAT 1800 EROSION CONTROL material , with HYDR0SEED\ MAIN REINFORCEMENT TO BE installed PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE FACE Snwp Slop* SurflKt SLOPES FROM 50* TO 70' MIRAMAT 1800 WITH i - 4 - HYDROSEED t) r<_4Ct -*0 2) :cw»*CT r»a. *4 w 1-J .r r — ' * .• r .7- TT. •1 \ Specify with Confidence Put the experience of Mirafi inc and many successfui Miragrid applications to work on your next project. Testing: During six years of product develop ­ ment and four years of use, Miragrid has _ undergone extensive product performance • and application tests. These laboratory ■ and/or field tests consist of wide strip tensile, creep, pullout, chemical exposure, ultraviolet ^ light, and site<lamage studies. This compre-: hensh/e test data is available to you. Durability: Miragrid is the reinforcement that keeps on working. Mirgrid's polyester yams j are inert to biological and chemical activity occum'ng in most normal soil conditions. Miragrid’s black coating provides protedion for long periods of exposure to ultraviolet light, as well.as additional shielding for aggressi^.chemical exposure, like landfills. li:. ...................................................................................................................................:■ ;• • •• ■ Proven Performance: Miragrid has been : used successfully by Slate Departments of i Transportation consulting firms. U.S. Forest Service. State Departments of Natural I Resources, private developers and county t governments. Miragrid allows you to be an: innovative design leader in your area, but; a follower of some experienced reinforced , soil experts. ! Service: Mirafi Inc has several design tools and manuals to assist you. This information and technical data on Miragrid products are available from your local Mirafi representa ­ tive. Do not let inexperience hold vou back. FMRiMMlbtUnglnpmgnu >'* WkM Strip "hsthg • Labomo/y MORE INFORMATION*» !• - .‘ r," - PQf pj,ore information and recommendations regarding . ..the most effective use of MIRAGRID, Call our - .1.* tt!l» f t' ' ►. i-T -\-v. .1 t** Tbll-Fiw Number, or Contact your local Mirafi Representative P.‘«t -.'IT* V -.-J 4,*^, -3 V■•'IT* V RO. Box 240967 S« ' Lyv^niiiiiv/n iw/vuiw III\^ ,.r.s , MS’! 704-523.7477 (NC/HI/‘.f- Ph*: 416-620-1200 FAX: 7(M-527-9547i ,, FAXr*^116;6^169f ■16 th* b*< d OUT low*l*dQ«i tlw Inloniwaon (Doo«iin*d h*f*in i aecwslfc Mirrf ^ carexX ^ine any•:Sasrisri;'S!K»i«ws “^^ ^ THE lilflAn VimRANTY. Minin liw wSranli Iti pfoducb to be from In mi^ delivw^ to Mlnn% customan. Mirafl fuitftor loafTantt that its products oontomfi to ?»• ^Mifas’i cwanl salts MtsrotuffcW a Mifsfi product to detoiaiva Of ctoes not my wpoblif^ipyincai^aito our • customtr glvis notict to Mirsn bttort InstaAno tht ptoduct, Mirafi^ * customtr of rtfund the purchase prict at Mtaft^ atocfioa Rtpla^ tht product of f M tor • b?.Ct.._.nd n V 4sz>:-V j* i J-■> - Canada Mirafi I ,» Dominion Textile Ina* ;lr%. w! i .v'-in-i-a. . .. S’ Printed in U5.A.Tt •r'*. .V'« •r>? DOMINION TEXTILE INC The local Mirafi representative can assist 1 you throughout the design process: from * concept/feasibility inrough detailed design ‘ to final drawings and specifications, pro-, viding installation assistance with on-site ^ contractor training. Both you and Mirafi’s ! representatives are supported by Mirali’s ' in-house designers with years of geotech-' meal /geogrid design experience armed with state-of-the-art analytical tools to assist you • in design. ■ « ; > Cost Effectiveness: Miragrid is the most; cost effective soil reinforcement available ^ today. Miragrid improves your project's | bottom line by eliminating other costly con- ] struction techniques or land acquisition, j The Miragrid difference means less material i of a higher long term alkMvable design load j is required. The Miragrid difference puts! you in control of the project budget. ;^ *:L ---1! r> vi ■X > fT»l / ^ A r ^ c CJ FAX FAX To: From: Jeanne Mabusth City OfOrono 612-473-7358 Susan Sumey Please cal! 612-338-8779 if you do not receive 2 pages. Here is an amended drawing of my proposed shoreline restoration. In response to Shawn D. Gustafson's recommendations to you in a letter dated April 6, 1993 we have modified the plan to include the engineer's recommendations: A silt fence will be installed along the perimeter of the shoreline prior to any construction to protea the lake from erosion. The fill soil will be a granular material. A system of duckbill anchors will be set into the existing soil bank and tied to a series of pipes for the miragrid to be attached to anchor it to the side slope. In addition to the American Excelsior Tutf reinforcement we will plant Crown Vetch to prevent future erosion. Riprap is already present along the property shoreline and since the proposed restoration is above the 929.4 elevation Ellen Klanderman of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distria said then typB of pBrttiit isfi t nBcesscry^ su»A«rv Sp«rtt To Sot»n Uu.-n.y I^UJ. •* Sutan Sumejp 1330 Cherry PL Orono. MN 55364 MIRAFI MIRAGRID 5T PLACED EVERY 4*H 2* OVERLAP LANDVIEW LANDSCAPING 3670 HWY 7 EXCELSIOR. MN 95331 470-5263 Slephen Spartz Ordinary High Water Mark 929.4 Lake Minnetonka auf pican excelsior turf REINF placed over DIS-RJRBED area ^rojjn2ij!£!l Planted 20 GiMuaiai With Hhnut Compacted 6*‘ I Exi slope 1 ting Rip Rap A /j ; ■ t'2 “ Pipe it 4>S* AnchiNt.m aLsffiSi The pipe* extend into other anchors placed 10‘ apart. The Mltagiid is Then wriapped around the pipes 10-15* Shoreward \ gm fence nlnre 5* from bcf C -OLUU K To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager May 4, 1993 #1810 Henry DeNero, 1245 Sixth Avenue North Conditional Use Permit COUNGILMEEnN MAY 1 0 1993 OIYOF .'it' Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 4 - Guest apartment. Description of Request The applicant requests a conditional use permit for the continued use of a guest apartment. The living space is located above the garage, which is attached to the principal dwelling by a breezeway. The living space has been used for many years as a caretaker apartment and there is no conditional use permit issued for a non-rental apartment. The applicant has been issued a building permit to remodel this apartment area and if the kitchen use is to be continued, a conditional use permit is required. The main question regarding this application is whether the garage and guest or caretaker apartment is considered to be part of the principal structure. The house is connected to the garage via an unheated breeze way. It is unknown whether the breeze way has a foundation. Entrance to the guest or caretaker apartment is via an exterior exit. The applicant’s parcel is greater than twice the minimum acreage required in the zoning district as required for the separate guest house. Planning C niiiiiikv ion Action The Planning Commission voted 5 For, 0 Against to approve the conditional use permit based on their determination that the guest or caretaker apartment is considered to be a separate structure for zoning purposes. a M Ma ^rnimm I A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 4 (A) FILE NO. 1810 WHEREAS, Henry DeNero (hereinafter the "applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1245 Sixth Avenue North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Refer to Exhibit A, (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit for the continued use of an existing non-rental guest apartment per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 4 (A). Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 1(^1810. 2. 3. The property is located in the LR-IA Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. On April 19, 993, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended approval based on the following findings: a. b. c. No footings are apparent beneath the breezeway. Primary access to the second story apartment over the garage is achieved via a separate exterior exit. The acreage of this parcel is more than two times the area required within the zoning district. Page 1 of 5 d. The septic system has been inspected and is considered to be substandard, but conforming system. e. The guest or caretaker apartment has been in existence for many years, but requires a conditional use permit at this time due to the issuance of a permit to remodel this structure. 4. The Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the non-rental guest apartment will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and CoiOprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Conunission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 4 (A) to the current owner and applicant, Henry DeNero, to permit a non-rental apartment on his property located at 1245 Sixth Avenue North, subject to the following conditions. The apartment shall never be used for rental purposes but must remain for the exclusive use of family members, guests or domestic help. Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by the applicant within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (May 10, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically 1. 2. 3. Page 2 of 5 4. terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council cn this 10th day of May, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 5 EXHrarr A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION All that part of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 291, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying south of a straight line drawn parallel with and 366 feet north of, measured at right angles to, the south line of Section 26, Township 118, Range 23; east of a straight line drawn parallel with and 725 feet east of, measured at right angles to, the east line of west one-half of the southwest quarter of Section 26, Township 118, Range 23, and the same extended; and west of a straight line drawn parallel with and 1,055 feet east of, measured at right angles to, east line of the west one-half of the southwest quarter of Section 26, Township 118. Range 23, and the same extended. Page 4 of 5 li I' Ilf r 41: STATE O: MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) (tescribed in and who executed the foregoing instiument. and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as hLs (their) free act and deed NOTARY PL BUC Page 5 of 5 'fc To:Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager Date:April 9. 1993 Subject:<jfl810 Henry DeNcro, 1245 Sixth Avenue North Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential. 2 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 4 (A) - Guest Apartment List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Floor Plan Discussion The applicant requests a conditional use permit for the continued use of a guest apartment. The living space in question is located above the garage, which is attached to the principal dwelling by * brtvzeway. This living space has been in use for many years as a guest or caretaker apartment. There is no record of a conditional use permit being issued for non­ rental ^>aitment. The applicant has been issued a permit to remodel this apartment area. If kitchen use is to be continued, a conditional use permit is required. The septic system has been inspected to assure that the system both meets the requirements of the DNR Shoreland Regulations as well as assure that it is of adequate size to serve the principal residence as well as the guest apartment. The system was inspected on March 17, 1993 at which time the system was determined to be conforming, but substandard as the size and construction of the septic tanks is unknown. The drainfield is, however, of adequate size for a five-bedroom home, and therefore requires no additions at this time. Issues for Consideration 1. The guest apartment is located above the garage and the only access to the apartment is via an exterior door. Zoning File #1810 April 13. 1993 Page 2 of 2 2. The residence is attached to the garage by an enclosed breezeway, not via internal access (refer to Exhibits D and E). Is the garage part of the principal structure? If the garage is considered a separate structure, would the st^ards for a guest house use be more appropriate? 3. The applicant’s parcel is greater than twice the minimum acreage required within the zoning district required for a guest house use. 4. The use of this living space as a guest or caretaker apartment has existed for many years. 5. Is it appropriate to establish conditions similar to the Waade application? OptkHis for Action 1. Approval as proposed. 2. Approval with conditions. 3. Denial. CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL Li\Nt^ USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address i?d‘=T ('o ir^ pj^Qpgjfty Idcntific3tion Nuinber (P.I»D») Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name ^ac^u.«3ic._ _ _ _ _ _ 4 Address c»C Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _Phone (work) 44^->535^_ _ _ City ^Aue.^fi<eiJO Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) 44-*^ Phone _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address t ’PJi City Zip 5S35^ Date Property Acquired _ _ _^1^9^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. 'I: PEES - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) 'X^ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration CITY OF DIM FI'NAi^E OFFICE Grading ana rxxiing - xwj. TT Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 or la PRD/PID - see fee schedule cm m 709.akesnora 03/22.*' Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 " $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 _ _ _ $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easer^ient Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTYPresent Zoning District Present Use of Property _ _ Residential Other (specify)__ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: '^gK/<c>ogi-P I ST iwc. ^ >3 S T* oti- REQUIRBD SUBMITTALS 3^1. Completed Application Form. •^2. 3. 7. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations Involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan» if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARB RBQUIRBD TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A MORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please r^ember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to th^beat of ^a/hmr lyiowledge. Applicant's signature Date ONHBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request Owner's signature Date ^ \’l ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. M. -q.V .< \ IITM •>. -V r,* * •» »s DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY yorto" fu?nish^ Vrivate°or confidential information. [ V - .if . You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be u*®-! t® aetermine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. YOU may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared ' _VjS>it %lfederal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit license. 4. If your requested permit or license Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First Middle Last -^4-V 3^ sr\ f , • Address w ] ^ A ■ 1 /Vfu. City ^State zip 4/1^- S3S3 Phone I understand my rights as stated above. •J.HUN MTI OSA«/tS MTCN 00<OMCH NMt TAMHAVIH NMC/AOM M SS 00S90148S snail Avc nNtUXAN R A SARBARA A SCARCE NIUXAN A BAWARA PEARCE PO BOK tSOO NPLS »M B5MO HCMCPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNPORNATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LXSTSB EA-llB-ES S4 00<H 01505 SIXTH AVC N MARY N DAYTON MARY N OAVTON ISOS ATH AVC H L0N6 URE 101 S5S5A REPORT NO. PXASSAOl PAGE 5SO EA-llB-^ES S4 000501XS5 SIXTH AVC NE N A M S SPENCEREOSON N A HARRIET S SPENCER11S5 SPRING HILL RDLONG LAKE Ml 5SS5A 1 TAXPAYCR NAM/AOOR SB tO'llB'ES SB 0004 01145 SIXTH AVC N JQIM S NACKAY TRUSTEE JOHN B NACRAY 1505 HUNTER OR MAYZATA Ml. 55S01 TAXPAYER .TOTAL BATCH NAME/ABQR OOE 00004 SB E4*I1B-XS 54 0007 01C45 SIXTH AVE N T OENCRO A N S OENERO HENRY T A NANCY S OENERO IE4S CO RO NO 4 LONG LAKE MN 55S54 SB E4-1IB-E5 54 OOOB 01245 SIXTH AVE N RICHARD ERICKSON/.RJLXC CORTY RICHARD ERICKSON/JULIE CORTY 1245 CO RO NO 4 LONG LAKE Ml 5SS54 1 0 \ \ E* .« • V •I . ' o ' • f. * • , I ■ \ . I 1 CCRHEY THAT THE PACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OP XNPORNATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE NEMCPIN COUNH DCPARTmN^OP PROPEMY_TAXATXON, TO THE BEST . .> • • • ’ ’ ' mm ''' . * l' ■ •• -it;..- Q n 0 4 - ♦ * •• ' .* * ’ t •'r Y'- O’* To •O “i ^■3 J 0 7 To:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator COUNCIL MEETWa MAY 1 0 1995 CnYOFOMMO From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:May 5, 1993 Subject:#1812 Thomas Patrick Goodyear, 712 Tonkawa Road Variances - Resolution Brief Reriew of AppUcatioD and Planning Commission Recommendation The applicant proposes a second stoiy addition over existing single story structure within a 2' + expansion of building envelope along the right side lot line. The right side expansion of the footprint has been aligned with a new fireplace chimney. Refer to Exhibits F-1,1 and J. A 12* X 34.3’ deck is proposed at the second story level to be placed over an existing patio. The 7* X 10* shed at the left side lot line shall be removed. The existing garage located within the County right-of-way is non-conforming and subject to all pertinent ordinances. The applicant also seeks approval for structural alterations to a boathouse located within the 0-75* setback. Applicant claims structure is in sound condition. Staff has confirmed that structure is in a serious state of disrepair and has no foundation. The installation of a second story over the existing footprint requires side setback variance to the left side lot line. The expansion of the footprint along the right side lot lirie will requite side setback variance of 1*. The staircase extending from the upper deck is considered an encroachment and must meet the required 10* side setback. The chinny originally thought to be a non-encroachment at 2* is only considered a non-encroachment if maintained at a 1 Vi’ width, applicant has been advised and sees no problem meeting the 1*A* width. The Planning Commission raised the concern that emergency vehicles could not access the property since the garage and the privacy fencing blocked all access from the ro^. Applicant concurred that he would be willing to remove the privacy fence which would provide a 10* access corridor to the property. Planning Commission Ri indation The Planning Commission approved the second story addition as long as no variances were required along the right side. The chimney and access stairs from deck would have to meet the required setback at the right side lot line. Planning Commission conditioned approval on an access corridor being provided on at least one side of the structure since the left side yard setback at 4’ remains. Approval was conditioned on the removal of the boathouse. The following inventory facts have been adjusted per the Planning Commission’s recommendation. f Loning File mi2 May 5, 1993 Page2 Adjusted lot coverage facts: Allowed = 1,925.3 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,204 s.f. or 17.1% Proposed = 2,608 s.f. or 20.3% Per Planning Commission Recommendation — 2,366 s.f. or 18.4% Hardcover facts: 0-75 ’ setback area Existing » 413.3 s.f. or 10.7% Proposed = 338.5 s.f. or 8.8% Per Planning Commission Recommendation » 120 s.f. or 3.1% Reduction in hardcover = 293.3 s.f. or 7.6% 75-250 ’ setback area Allowed *= 2,246 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,409.6 s.f. or 26.8% Proposed " 2,588 s.f. or 28.8% Per Planning Commission Recommendation = 2,522 s.f. or 28% Hardcover increase ^ 113 $.f. or 1.25% The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission’s recommendation. Applicant has asked that Council consider his original proposal that would seek a 1* setback variance for the expansion of the building envelope of the principal structure along the right side lot line and a 4 ’ side setback variance for the second story access stairs. Mr. Goodyear also for consideration concerning the proposed alterations reduction of the footprint of the original boathouse. In a recent meeting with applicant, Mr. Goodyear advised that the privacy fence that blocked access to the property has b<^ removed. Members are also cautioned to not use the lake access stairs because of the unsafe condition. Applicant may rebuild access stairs based on the standards set forth in the new Shoreland Regulations. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C), SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 1812 WHEREAS, Thomas Patrick Goodyear (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 712 Tonkawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: That part of Lot 8, Parten’s Point, First Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesou lying southeasterly of the following described line: commencing at the most westerly comer of Lot 8; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 8 a distance of SI.34 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence northeasterly parallel with the north line of said Lot 8 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and there terminating (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit construction that would result in an increase of 113 s.f. or 1.25% hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area, hardcover exists at 2,409.6 s.f. or 26.8% and is proposed at 2,522 s.f. or 28% where only 25% is allowed, per Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) a second story addition to be installed over the existing ftxHprint located 4’ from the side lot line instead of the required 10’ and per Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) seeks approval of a lot coverage variance where improvements result in 2,366 s.f. or 18.4% of structural coverage where only 15% is allowed and where 17.1% exists. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File ^1812. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential 2^ning District requiring one acre in acre or 43,560 s.f. The property consists of 12,835.5 s.f. or .29 acres. Page 1 of 5 3. 5. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 19, 1993 and recommended approval of the application as amended based upon the following findings. A. There is no additional land available. B. Applicant proposes a reduction of hardcover within the 0-75* setback area of 293.3 s.f. or 7.6% where 10.7% exists. C. The property is only 51’ in width. The existing structure is 34.3 ’ maximum width and could never meet the re(|uiTed side yard setbacks. D. The foundation of the structure has been reviewed by structural engineers and found to be able to support the second story addition. E. The residence is located well behind the average lakeshore setback of the residences on adjacent lots. The City Council finds that the c renditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not appiy generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the ai^licant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and inrent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the fmdings and recommendations of the Plaiming Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C), Section Page 2 of 5 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 that would allow the construction of a second story addition to be located 4 ’ from the left side lot line resulting in an excess of har dcover within the 75-250’ setback area, hardcover is proposed at 2,522 s.f. or 28% hardcover where 2,409.6 s.f. or 26.8% exists and a lot coverage variance at 2,366 s.f. or 18.4% where only 15% is allowed and where 17.1% exists, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for new construction, ai^licant shall obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the boathouse within the lakeshore yard. All structural improvements to principal structure shall meet required 10* setback from right side yard. Chimney can encroach no more than IV^’ into side yard and access stairs from second story deck must meet 10’ side setback. Applicant is placed on notice that detached garage within street yard that encroaches the right-of-way of County Road 135 is non-conforming and is subject to all pertinent ordinances. Any proposed structural repairs to this structure will require City approval. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (May 10, 1994>. Violation of or non-c(Mnpliance with muy of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of May, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of ^y, 1993 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ’ Notary Public Page 4 of 5 To: From: Date: Subject: //. Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator April 15. 1993 #1812 Thomas Patrick Goodyear, 712 Tonkawa Road Variances * Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential Lot area — 12,835.5 s.f. or .294 acres Pertinent Ordinances 1. 2. 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover inventory. A. 0-75* setback area = 3,850.5 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 413.3 s.f. or 10.7% Proposed ~ 338.5 s.f. or 8.8% B Applicant proposes alteration of existing boathouse within lakeshore yard requiring hardcover variance approval. 75-250’ setback area = 8,984.5 s.f. Allowed = 2,246 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2.409.6 s.f. or 26.8% (applicant ’s original estimate 1,669 s.f. or 18.6 %) Proposed = 2,588 s.f. or 28.8% (applicant estimate 2,225 s.f. or 24.8%) Increase in hardcover = 178.4 s.f. or 2% Hardcover variance = 342 s.f. or 3.8% Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback. Required * 75’ Existing = 2’ Proposed » 11’ Variance = 64 ’ or 85.3% Lakeshore setback variance approval required for proposed alteration of boathouse located within lakeshore setback area. Section 10.24, Subd. 5 (B) - Side yard setback variances. A. Right side. Required - 10’ Existing » 11’ Proposed « 9’ Variaixre = 1’ or 10% Zoning File ^1812 April 15, 1993 Page 2 B Left side. Required = Existing = Proposed = Variance = 10’ 4’ = 4’ 6 ’ or 60% Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total area » 12,835.5 s.f. Allowed = 1,925.3 s.f. or 15% Existing *= 2,204 s.f. or 17.1% Proposed = 2,539.5 s.f. or 19.7% Variance = 614.2 s.f. or 4.7% List of Exhibits A B C D E F G H 1 J Application Property Owners List Plat Map Hardcover Fact Sheet 0-75 ’ Setback Before/After Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250’ Setback Before/After Floor Plans House Elevations Boathouse Elevation Proposed Site Plan Survey of Existing Improvement Description of Request The applicant proposes what appears to be the conversion of a summer cabin imo a full year-round residence. A second story will be installed over the existing single story reside^ with a two-story expansion along right side, refer to Exhibits I and J. Proposed reconstruction of the seasonal cabin will require side setback variances. Note left side is located 4.06’ from north side lot line. On the right side, the existing smicture is located 11’. The new addition will be 9* requiring a ! ’ setback variance. Applicant proposes the removal of the shed located 2’ from the north side lot line. In addition the applicant has proposed so^tural almratioiis of the boathouse reducing the structure from 25.5’ x 11.5’ to 13’ x 11.5’ with a lakeside deck 6 X 11.5’. The proposed alteration will result in reduction of hardcover within the 0-75 ’ setback area. It is customary for the Building staff to review all structures located within the lakeshore setback area proposed for major structural alteration. The applicant has clauned that the structure is strucmrally sound. The Building staff reports that the structure has a limited Zoning File #1812 April 15, 1993 Page 3 foundation consisting of posts and earth floor. The roof appears to be in serious disrepair. If the boathouse was to be altered as proposed, a new foundation, roof and possible siding would be required. The staff has taken photos of the strucure for your review at our meeting. The stairs within the lakeshore yard must be rebuilt. Members are cautioned m>t to use stairs to descend to lakeshore yard. Recent lakeshore regulations will allow applicant to install stairs at 4' width. A building permit is only required prior to construction. Review Exhibit J. Note houses on both sides are located completely in front of the existing structure. An extensive grassed yard exists between house and lakeshore. Drainage runs directly to lake. Applicant ’s improvements result in a 2.6% increase in lot coverage and a 2% increase in hardcover. Issues for Consideration 1. 2. What recommendation will Planning Commission have concerning the boathouse? The removal of the boathouse would result in a 2.3% reduction in hardcover within the lakeshore setback area and maintain total lot coverage at 17.4%. The right side addition has been aligned with a 2’ wide fireplace improvement. The 2’ chimney encroachment is considered a non-encroachment. Should addition maintain existing 11 ’ setback rather than 9’ setback? 3.The detached garage at 886.9 s.f. is non-conforming and could never be rebuilt in its present location. A new garage would have to be less than 750 s.f. to meet the required setbacks with doors facing away from the street and mrnaround provided on site. Future hardcover reductions may be realized at the time of future garage construction which would also require a variance review because of the excesses of hardcover within the 75- 250 ’ setback area. Options of Action Approval as proposed. OR Approval as amended. Denial f! ■; CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICA^OH, V, ' y ^\ Initial Application Fee $175.00 v/ 7.,^Z(§50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^oAO- - --- - - w.*ft ■ 1 •. *.* V rrrv ru noniin FmuCE OFFICE 1350200000 rucric 01 OEfi •i".r /*'' Ji 225.00 i<ECEIFT-m^’ YOU msi60 cool ROl T12:. OJ/25/' Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 0^f/V^^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired Hl'KlL I (do) (^o no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land, PresentTlsSof property:X residential (month/year) lane other(specify) Zoning District: APPLICANT Phone (home).^/^'^ ^^"^3 Nam* P/^r/lirlC _______ Phone (work) ---- ~7/'2 -foivKA*^^ cltvi lo/Vf, ^ip = OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (worlc) Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ City:Zip: description OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $, Describe request In detail: L£fr S,0€ 6Crmj<: ^ j <erf{A^K ^oocef) To h -- - - -—_ _ __ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width X Setback:Front X Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore X Other fspecify) 6rLF Of- HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPnON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual propert conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:- - huf^f^TicN 1h FC ^ fC£T fiiprrs LCf^r ^,toc pf np F k-hT 5iOF pf- fc\yn/)A7/cAj Cp^^ccr/Q/Ti. s/)r Fr>,j/^/)fi!T,cN « 'To 6€ 50 TmAT Th€ Fouf^Mr.O^ ------- , ______________ _______________—---------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the applicatic deadline date in order for your application to be cousidered comolete; 1. Completed Application Form 2. / Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you mu'.t obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Cente. 348-3271). 3. / Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. t/ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to includ* hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%”xll" fo: reproduction), Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changer in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. y S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll'') 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign t.his application. Please remember that voor variance application is not complete if the above lafomation has not been incloded. APPLICAMT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date 5'^ - ONHERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby aclcowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga ­ tion and vei .fication of this request. Owner's Signature Date 3"^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cosmiission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. •. . sfWNumm >;: '' > ';• - ^ t.;. V i. i A.•j'.'fj# % 1 1 a V 1 G • V V .. • u\' w>iir-ts SI MU•if':'/MSM-'-n'*€MCK NIMI M t MMitV I 0 H MAOIIV . TMMVn « ‘J '.NICIIML » • OllVlA N MMUV ■• WM/MM 7,: «M .TOMUMA. Hi •■(-••.-•f-- , • 'LONi UKI; It* •> USM TJMiAVni ,siv;M-ur<n » mu MTit MjQfVci Muno TWMi P OOOOYtM S5U« • • • IflNi UM Ml t : ifi « .< * .♦C ; r!! • /*I-^** , ?■’ *>■ * v»*. * TAMMtifI SiK M-117>tS S4 OMS r 'Mm:<fnMUMS M Hil t t M URMN THUSttlS ’ ;MIIRT<:il-.UiaON tOM UtKI Ml ^ SISM . ’• • • f.s r . * •• *'• i i‘ • Vi » •' r » 'V HCMCiXN COUNTY PMMIITV INTOmUTiaN SYSTCH MQifllTY OMCRS LISTSi OS-U7-T5 SS MIS OMU T0M(»tt W iARBAM PUM iAMAM PU6N AYS TONKAItt ROAD LONG LAKC Ml SSSM Si OS>ll7-» S4 OMl M7<t TONRANA M JAMOUi CORR TARMT KN P/P STANLEY 8 SANDXFORO 722 TOMIANA M lONB LAKE m SS5M Si 05-117-2S Si OOM M7M TOMCANA RO ALAN J URXN ALAN J URXN 7A0 TOMIAHA M LONB LAKE Ml S555A If •V.-r • •4 - 38; 05^117-23 33 0019 - (MS 'TOlrttAWA RD . . ..., A*i^8.>BIHSER ■ - ‘ ;fALBERT:^6 S^LLY HANSER ' V . i < •t3600;xbs CENTER. 55402 C . I . • "IM 0-., • / V • v|* >* :V* . tit*.. ^ t REPORT NO. PXASSAOl RAGE 4 /■* • :• /‘VA- *' . Si 05-117-2S SS 001400700 TOMIANA ROT H SPOONER A J N SPOONERTEO H SPOONERlOOiS SUHAC CXREDEN PRAXRXS Ml S5S47 Si 0S-117«2S S4 0M2 00720 TOMCANA M P J NXOOLETON ET AL P J A R J HXM':ETON 720 TON(AHA RO LONG LARE Ml SSS5A TOTAL GATCM M2 DOOM, V 1 mJ V/*4r I CERTXPY THAT TM PACTS REPMSCNTEO ARE AN ACCMATE AND TRUE ____ REPRESENTATION OP XNPORNATXON AS XT APPEARS THXS DATE ON THE RECORM OP THE NEMCPXN COUNTY OEPARUfENT OP PPOPEMV JAXAHON* TO TMI REST OP NT RNONLEDGE AND iCLXEP 'x. • n ■ iM f ^ ■ ' VV"'' . ‘ •• ’• •. ■** * J f G ; :»‘'V 0 • O • * ■■ f^ * *tP r> •••• i /. •m* « ••,**✓ f II »•*** (19) P>£F ck C HARDCOVER CALCULATIONJ^KSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE^^^"^^/ 75-250' 250-500'500-1000' A. House Y LENGTH X WIDTH - Y ^ X 03 X .C P i 1 % Bo/^r Hci^/ B. Garage ' .Po f 5^X 11.^- ^3.3 c. D riveway ___X • ' )m . » • *• X c e r r B. Sidewalk nU X 3 • /^O c e • ••• • ••n • X ♦ c c ■*> X c e£• rATIO/D eck X a .c c • F.Landscape X AREAS UNOERUIN BY _ X c ePLASTIC SHEETING . X m M 51 r f X ■» M • r • S.F. S.F. 6. Other X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 4/1^_ S.F. s tS X 100 - 10,1 % HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE oneV'^O^T^ 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone Afra" 250-500' 5u0-I0C0' A. House LENGTH WIDTH S.F. S.F. S.F. . V 'n \ S.F. novie/ 3. Garage _ _13 c, Driveway IL3' S.F. S.F. S.F. STAl/ii/ D, Sidewalk W 5 S F. S.F. _X S.F. E. Patio/ Deck F,Landscape AREAS UNDERLAINBY RUSTIC SHEETING //.f 6 ^9 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 3- - - ^<b.r S.F. S.F. s.*- S.F.I! X 100 ?o BefcHit HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEI SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ^S-250^^ 250-500' 500-1000 Existing Hardcover in Zone ! 9^ .. A. House .N.^X <^.3 ^07.3 S.F. LENGTH WIDTH !i>3 X i'V, 3 s 33^,/S.F. X S.F. X S.F. X S.F. Bt Garage /r,/^X 30,.^,V5 S.F. c. Driveway X s S.F. X 3 S.F. D. Sidewalk M X 3 S.F. X • S.F. to'X z4.3 3 if'5 Air S.F. E. Jatio/ Deck X S.F. p. Landscape • X S.F. areas UNDERLAIN BY X .S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X S.F. X tor S.F. G. Other \o X -7 .7^LcA Total Hardcover IN Zone . 0 S.F. [A ( A i iJ • V 'i' >». I %4 Total Property Area in Zone S.F. IT] D X 100 % aL.'c f HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSKE^^^ SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE one) 0-75'75-250'/ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone X. ’-i’- 3 fy • length ,^5', ^ < X WIDTH^/7/.^r 5"/ t f ■ S.F. ^ 10 X 5b ;■■ A 1• • S.F. V ' \>' . X % . S.F. -----------• X 1 B.Garage /S-./S"X G. - l(p‘7 ^ , /* A 5^5. V , S. F. c.D riveway .X ___M S.F. ____■ X <0 * . ^ ^ t S.F. D.Sidewalk X 3 S.F. X 3 i S.F. X S.F. e.Jatio /D eck f -A. \2 X 3>f-^ 3n.9^ . V.A S.F. _ F. Landscape 3 X ifa- S.P. AREAS UNOERUA a N BY X _ S.F. plastic SHEETING X .S.F. X .S.F. 6. C )ther X S S.F.^ Total H ardcover IN Zone mS.F. A Total Property Area :n Zone s.p. H X 100 d.ii J J \ » < -I * I * • • i * - M .J I* ^ ^ h J u ‘ i • '- /%* ^1 . *f ^ rr #- ir.«^ _ ^-V Yi. *_ ------^ g^ CS4*-n >%AJkt% S">W .< / s-iV'Vvjx <7-V»* ^4«*4’C Mik«T«|k.'bb&tLOC^ \K ut «^ ' - .* ’ * ‘ : . k ' f .iskic: - ifri I * -*V I* *•' • V ' ♦ .*^"* * ’* '■f»* • a i^ l' .-' I*f-^ m S'-^U i. I ^ V1.S1 BTW9 kw v*yY*^ *"*?“*■ • ‘ I • •( I •’! *, i* ^J^uct CH l JJ__fl^^- ^4 - -J ‘ I OT‘IS ✓ /■ % ' . • t ♦ - * “ * /j y <p?^y S s • . . •L. ----------. • •«i ■3£m9BLS»S^5»»' lurasr • • ■ •.•.•.■■■. .;■* l • 9• • I: 'icyAVCT ..j:TSsts«:*": 1 'M # • • ♦ •ft« • .* •'. ' . : , ‘f, • . r • ..•» •• • ' • ••• *• T'.* • V-V-- •'■• • - r ■ • * I. . '•**;♦ . . '• .r:: -r • .‘•.■? • :.. :y-• •• • -. a " T |g . ^^ ^ ^ _ _______ • k .j ^ . h. ... f ! *% »S '* .• .» .• ••• ••. > w • •' . I \ S • . V .»• 1 a I ch JX -3 j’— •m-‘ •* *1 ‘ * l-,. .,■ V f HiiililHitlilillllll II ttHtfiltBISIIIIIIIf zr-jn. ...... «l -!-i •j % •IF P*,K>^ I V-l^tac. “TO .»A K40T.. ^ ^^P»OMS/eAje :y; At5O^T\0t^"77/£ <^0O£Dy<SAR.'S» ntZ TbioKJ^uiA acAU: 4% Stt0u»$J 'A^fmVEO BY DRAWN BY 1 OATt: t^/!9 • ssss* wjOEPtHOtHct Avt. tuesJATloO / .* .'V • r y . COUNCIL MEElilB TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator MAY 10 1993 CnvOFORONO FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:May 4, 1993 SUBJECT: <5^1814 Tom Berthiamume/Cherryl Kachenmeister, 3035 Casco Point Road Variances - Resolution Brief Review of Application Applicants propose a two story addition to the lakeside of the residence and a grade level deck extension at the side. A portion of the two story addition will encroach the average setback line by 8’ and is to be located 9’ from the side lot line where the existing residence is located 9’4". Applicants propose removal of some 720 s.l. of landscaped rock areas underlain with plastic to offset excesses of hardcover within 75-250 ’ setback area. The majority of the two story addition will be placed over an existing lakeside deck and patio area. Members found the 8’ er.c,r<!achment of a portion of the two story addition will have no major impact on the lake view windows of the adjacent residences. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the multiple variance application as proposed by applicant based on the following hardships and findings: A. 840 s.f. or 7.7% of neighbor’s paved mmaround is located on applicant’s property and credited against the hardcover inventory in the 75-250 ’ setback area. B. 474 s.f. or 6.7% of neighbor’s driveway is located within the 250-500’ setback area of the applicants’ property. C. Unusual narrow shape of lot. D. Lx)cation of structure on property. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Punning Commission’s recommendation. Please review the Planning Commission memo for the April 19th meeting and Planning Commission packet for more background and detail on the review of the application. it 1 k n-f . er A :;ESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B); 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; AND 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE i!^1814 WHEREAS, Thomas Berthiamume and Cherryl Kachenmeister (hereinafter the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3035 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract A, RLS No. 394, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property’); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B); 10.22, Subdivision 2; and 10_25, SuMivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a two story lakeside addition measuring 17 6 x an addition to the existing grade level deck at 6 ’ x 19’2". A comer of the two story addition will be located 8’ in front of the average lakeshore setback Ime where no such encroachment is allowed. The two story addition shall be located 9’ from the side lot line imtead of the required 10’ The proposed improvements will result in a 5.7% reduction of hardcover wi /u e 250’ setback area and a 246 s.f. or 3.2% reduction in the 250-500’ setback area. In 75-250 setback area, hardcover exists at 6,909 s.f. or 63.97% and is proposed at 6,293 s.f. 58.27%^ In the 250-500’ setback area, hardcover exists at 3,285 s.f. or 42.6% and it proposed a 3, s.f. or 39.4%. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1814. Page 1 of 5 2. 3. 4. 5. The property is located in the LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1/2 acre or 21,780 s.f. The property consists of .55 acres or 24.130 s.f. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 19, 1993, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based on the following hardships and findings: A.The property exceeds the required area for the zoning district but has an unusual narrow shape. B. The location of structure on property. C. D. There is no adjacent land available. Neighbor’s drive and turnaround encroaches on applicants’ property adding 7.7% hardcover within the 75-250 ’ setback area and 6.7% within the 250-500 ’ setback area. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not applv generally to other property in this zoning districti that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicai ts; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has v-onsidered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 t i CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B); 10.22, Subdivision 2; and 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a two story addition and lakeside deck requiring an average lakeshore setback vmance of 8’, a side setback variance of r or 90% and approval of hardcover excesses within the 75-250 ’ setback area where improvements are proposed, hardcover to be maintained at 6,293 s.f. or 58.27%, subject to the following conditions: 1.All existing hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new residential construction. 2.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (May 10, 1994). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of May, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 P 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Ki The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Oron’o, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrumem, and Acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 __before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appearedknown to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument.'Acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (theu) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 ,... . ix:.. TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE;April 15, 1993 SUBJECT; #1814 Tom Berthiamume/Cherryl Kachenmeister, 3035 Casco Point Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District LR - 1C Zoning District Total area = 24,130 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) - Lot coverage Area = 24,130 s.f. Allowed = 3,619.5 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 3,329.2 s.f. or 13.7% Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) - Average lakeshore setback variance Allowed = 0 Existing = 0 Proposed = 8’ Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover inventory A. 0-75’ setback area = 5,620 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 96 s.f. No change is proposed B.75-250’ setback area = 10,800 s.f. Allowed = 2,700 s.f. or 25% Existing = 6,909 s.f. or 63.97% Proposed = 6,293 s.f. or 58.27% Variance = 3,593 s.f. or 33.2% Hardcover Reduction = 616 s.f. or 5.7% Deck and house additions result in net hardcover increase of 104 s.f. (to be placed over existing deck and patio) plus removal of 720 s.f. of non-structural hardcover. ■i ♦ 2 Structural hardcover increase of 470 s.f. (200 s.f. of lakeside deck to be replaced with two story addition) C.250-500’ setback area = 7,710 s.f. Allowed = 2,313 s.f. or 30% Existing = 3,285 s.f. or 42.6% Proposed = 3,039 s.f. or 39.4% Hardcover reduction = 246 s.f. or 3.2% Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) - Side setback Required = 10’ Existing = 9’4" Proposed = 9’ Variance = 1’ or 10% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Neighbors Acknowledgment Form E - Existing Hardcover F - Proposed Hardcover G - Survey of Existing Improvements H - Survey of Proposed Improvements 1 - Development Packet Existing/Proposed Elevations Site Plans Floor Plans Cross Section/Profile Description of Request Applicant proposes a two story addition to the lakeside of the existing residence measuring 17’6 ’’x26 ’3" and an addition to the existing grade level deck at 6 ’xl9.2". Th® story addition will encroach the average lakeshore setback line by 8 ’. The addition will be located 9’ from the side lot line. The current structure is 9’4" from the side lot line. Applic^t proposes removal of non-strucmral hardcover consisting of rock with plastic totalling some 720 s.f. Review Exhibit G, portions of neighboring property’s drive and turnaround are located within subject property adding to excess of hardcover. Zoning File #1814 April 15, 1993 Page 3 Upon a site inspection, staff noted no major impact on the view windows of the adjacent residences. Review Exhibit D, adjacent property owners have been advised of the proposed improvements. The City has received no comments from neighbors receiving written notice. Issues for Consideration 1.Hardcover within 75-250’ setback area has been reduced to 58.27%. As already noted above, portions of neighbor ’s drive and turnaround are located on applicant's pioperty. In the 75-250’ setback, 840 s.f. or 7.7% is neighbor ’s hardcover and in the 250-500’ setback area, 474 s.f. or 6.7%. Are there other hardcover improvements on property that could be considered for removal? 2.Will there be a visual impact from the two story structure upon the lakeshore views of adjacent residences? 3.Is the proposed improvement similar to other improved residences within immediate neighborhood? Statement of Hardship Please review Exhibit A. Applicant notes unusual shape of lot and narrowness of lot, location of structure on property, location of neighbor ’s drive and turnaround on property and no adjacent land available. Any recommendation for approval must include the condition that all existing hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for the residential construction. - CITY OP ORONO -VARIANCE T^PLICATIOl^l^y",/5Lf.riis? 11 jIt^1r50^f^-:^raddL^o:ai'’:a.iance,-rnr^cJr4^rrr.4in;i°“ppuca.^onjvariance for non conforming uee ?200.00 Rfter-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)_ _ _ _ _ .0A hi \L^Trr^Kjt uiwifu' LTAfA\jnr nccTrCI aMflMUi- U'l I ALl-i 7 1*1 r*'*! f*J !»*k0. v'v'vv'vA f rrvCL.;i -yc. t ^'9.-iTr fV) i: / w*»v'v■L'CTv 7Li^ l ?UUI\ » *-receipt -^ y^.,.;i26B220 COOl TOi iV^;-A~i r *t‘ PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address__j^.^_^jk , r^ A OCOProDerty Identif. Number (P.I.D.)— —- - - - - rS legal description to application if not included on required Date ProofiXty Acquired 3 —_ (month/year) ^^^^5SSl^r'^^o\“e;(specify)I (do). Present use of property: Zoning District:_ _ _ __—1 —K\ applicant Ncime Phone (home) ^^ *~j- C■^u- /f‘?% :> ^4^/l*^%<iy)i:^Phone (wor)c). Phone (home)- - - - - - - - Address OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address: Phone (wor)c) City: Estimated Construction Cost $ Zip:_ _ _ _ _ _ description OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width ^ Hardcover Lot Coverage yC-Setbac'K:Front Side Rear X~ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) ;;^OT»/iEi^raio7or^iD];i"FROPERTYCONDIWOMS , r^^f£icultv and unustial property Describe undue hardship or p zoninq Code requirements:_______ conditions preventing compliance^x / ^'Ty^.,.irJryL/Z^S^.__ / nAtn\CMU•rrrrI“Tk .Vc. I w'« V'V.-4-7r A,*!I w* * W•• vn^/^ I C'»-*I i T i "» C' • ‘*1 t VW • 4-/vt /CVv.*/ • ^<2TE) re jroperf. 1*3 1. Completed Application Form2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtainthis list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center348-3271).3. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include ’ hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for ireproduction). 5. ?.'opographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). ^ 6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5"xll'). 7. ~As an addendum to this applicatioUf please attach a separate list o any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variatnce application is not complete—if— 4 Tiforwiation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE , . jThe owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consu an s, agents. Commission members, and Council members fci purposes o nves ga tion and verification of this reqi^st. Owner' s Signature / AT -- - - - - - - - - - - AppUcIn7nus7hI7e‘7l77u7mittaXs into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetii^s are ^ . third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Build g g Office of this change prior to the meeting. icationobtainCenterInclude 11" for >j"xll"). St of Please above .red or t (staff icpenses rmation T’’RUN DATE 05/11/93 BATCH 001 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST NAHE/ADOR 5055 CASCO POINT ROAD KAYZATA MN 55591 127 NOODLANN AVE ST PAUL m 55105 REPORT NO. PI435<»01 PAGE 1SB 20-117>23 34 0001 30 20-117-23 34 0002 58 20-117-25 54 0005PROP ADDR 03035 CASCO POINT RD 05025 CASCO POINT RD 05015 CASCO POINT Rl«ONNER NAME T BERTHIAUHE/C KACHErtlEISTER .R G HCGANN ACL MCGANN R G LAURIE ETALTAXPAYERTHOMAS B BERTHIAUME ROBERT G HCGANN R G LAURIENAHE/ADDR 3035 CASCO POINT ROAD 5025 CASCO POINT RD S 5015 CASCO PT RO ■Ai WAYZATA MN 55391 NAYZATA m 55591 WAYZATA MN 55591 • • ' i * • 38 2D-117-23 34 0011 58 20-117-25 54 0012 58 20-117-25 54 0017 PROP ADDR 03065 CASCO POINT RD 05045 CASCO POINT RD 05061 CASCO POINT R( •ONNER NAME R J JEROEE 8 J F JEROEE R A KASTENS ABC HASTENS DORIS HOLITOR-WATERS TAXPAYER ROBERT D A JEAft^ JEROEE RICHARD Aj^ARBARA C KASTENS TODD WATERS aTs NAHE/ADDR 3065 CASCO POINT ROAD 5045 CASCO POINT RD 5061 CASCO POINT RD J •✓ * * WAYZATA HN 55391 NAYZATA MN 55591 WAYZATA MN 55591 » • # • .38 20-117-23 34 0018 58 20-117-25 54 0024 58 20-117-25 45 0055 PROP ADDR 03055 CASCO POINT RD 05005 CASCO POINT RO 05040 CASCO POINT Rl •ONNER NAME JOHN P DENNIS ETAL JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL J H MOGAN ETAL• * T-.TAXPAYER JOHN P A EVY C DENNIS JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JOHN A SUSAN MOGAN 4652 EMERSON AVE S MPLS MN 55409 1 i •Cl *:.L c* (I PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER . NAHE/ADOR ‘ ‘ ♦ • • . I )¥ » r TOTAL BATCH 001 00009 ! - I 38 20-117-23 43 0052 3030 CASCO POINT RD JAMES MASSEY ET AL . JAMES MASSEY 3030 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 • « V. . f . V • r‘ i. ’ ^ ^ - IV'. ' • ■ i • (T •• " ^ . * * ’ .’.-1 L ■ ♦* * ^ ‘ i. • i ¥ % . ; ^ ^ • « 38 20-117-23 34 0025 3020 CASCO POINT RD E LTNDCREN JR & B LINDGREN E LINIXJREN JR & B LINDGREN 3020 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0026 CAROL J KELLY CAROL J KELLY 3020 CASCO POINT R.> WAYZATA MN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEr#<EPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFJ 'Wj MlllLa I * t ' • rJ • jiiili • « i ;■ ' ‘Nh ^ ^ ’! J J t. 1 I Jr ‘n • I o » ) . ! 4 • t * adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form D [print name(s) ][print address] ^ T=.nc fnr the oroDOsed imorovement or proposea use of the llllJrZ'ZLlll at 5^ar^f£££^^i^ """" Application. No. . a. /I in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am I (we) undersuand that 1 - disaporoval of the property or use (are) not asked to declare Council'that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to ^hat the proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that tne ?r p requires C^nc^l apj^roval. Date 3-J7S-?3 Property Owner -- - - - - - Date ***<.***********************’^********** I (we) [print name(s)][print address I have reviewed the aY^o ”ref erred^ to as Land Use property located at . —- - - -- Application No. ^ 4.Ko^. in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am I (we) understand that xn disapproval of the property or use (are) not asked to Council that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to ^Lt tL proposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that tne pt requires Council approval. /? •, 1 —i ^ Property Owner Date Property Owner I rv ~T^hor)^^ disLr-i/'h/GLiyy^^ HARDCOVER CALCUUTIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE'ome ) 0-75' 75-250 E xisting Hardcover in Zone ' (750-50_0) 500-10Q0' • • A. r • •• ^ . ■ House “ x • S.F. length width• • • ♦ x _S3 S • F ■ • %. • X s • • S.F. • • •• X s • S.F. • - • %i • 5HeD ic,z. y S.F.m B. •# .* • *, •»• Garage ... x • • • S • F • n ‘ -7-^ ') ' ■J C. • • I • • • Driveway _ x • ' • /‘t-O = 334-S.F. .* )/ ^ zzs = 2^63 • • S.F. • - '** i 1 f M 0 • • D.,: • \ *• •• • Sidewalk • x • • •• S.F. •A . • \ • « X 8 • S.F. ‘ > . •- . . . • X •• S.F. •.3 E.ATIO/ , ........... ... Deck X • • • ••• • •S.F. ■" Jt "’•tr t • F. Landscape ' x jTz4i,t)'~t~b ^ S.F. AREAS underlain BY ■ . X • • ----- • S.F. PLASTIC”........... • • SHEETING . - . X „ • • • S.F. • • • f X ___^____________ • S.F, ' • G. Other . _ x •, S.F. • . • . • • a Total Hardcover in Zone 3Z8^ # S.F.A •Total P roperty Area in Zone T!/o •S.F.B J28S ' .fin 77/X 100 - _% • • •• • •• • •• M»M« • * • • aw**** rnfr ^ 1- -vr-.. . ~n^hoMa ri)\0 LA jvu; HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET/^ )(/ '57/>y^<^ SETBACK ZONC: (CIRCLE ONE)75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone y-S-73 • • A •■ House " x • :a S.F. s length • • WIDTH • X ^ • • • • S3 S.F. ’h ■ % • X 8 • • S.F.1 • m • • •• X a • SiFi• • * * •• • i • X • • ^ • • •• • a SiFi •B. • Garage x • • • S.Fi•* • • J C. • • 1 • ir* • • • D riveway x ’ • • S.F. h >f a m 9 9 S.F. . 3 'I -.fib • D.. • • Sidewalk • 5<f •• • S.F,’ - •• X • f s • S.F, ••^ ... . . • • X • f • a • S.F, • • E.’atio / .. bsCK • / /. 3 • V 3-7 /Z> B SZ-^7 S3 , /^•'S \ 74 S.F, • • • • F. Landscape ' x • • S.F.• •% AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ . X • • • S.F, •PLASTIC............... SHEETING ............ X • • • • ' S.F. • ••• • X ••• S.F. ^fone, wMs// G. Other ___x . /S.F.• V Total Hardcover ii • Total Property A rea fl • ’4. N Zone ?6*S.F, !•IN Zone T] S # F • 1 ' • X 100 - „ —/ • • • *.• . *• • • • 4. • • •mrn^m «• •• . • < • • m .•-••• •H* 0^0 mm mmmmm • B % # • • ■ar/r^ r i- I / ho I u ;v\ C_ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-/5'(^75^^ 250-500' 50Q-1C00' S-S-y3 Existing Hardcover in Zone A. ■ House 3. Garage 26./ •X 4^.21 S;• /2g4-. I A 5.F. LENGTH WIDTH /9.Z'_ X 24.3 S 3os.d S • f 1 r mo 3 Z.o _ X ss .6 • • C • • * •''•uy •• - X SS • _ X • • •• • • •• • 0 • r • c p • •. * *. m • • t 0 • r • • - X s= • S.F,^ * • • #r* • c. Driveway /•//* X X = ZB6^±S.F. zz. D.. Sidewalk ‘ ^3 4 /s 2.40 - S.F. _ S.F. . 3.8 S.4- S.F. ^*^Tlo E. P atio / 7.5 « X Z/O )eck . • »•• • • ■ iM • ___ S.F. • • B>BS S.F. » .. F.Landscape areas underlain BY ' . . 3.*7 ^7 PLASTIC------------- SHEETING X X X . /•'C.9^ CtyCfJi/ G. O ther /73 Z x ^S9 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F, Total Hardcover in Zone Total P roperty Area m Zone • • ^ loSOQ X 100 - ^3- ^7 l0^z>oo S.F. S.F.B ^90? • \i.B % • 0 m «•••• • ^ #••• f •tfeP • • •• •• • 9mm0 0m00 mm 0^ HARDCOVER CALCULATIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE! (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ fT5-250‘) 250-500' 500-1000' Existing H ardcover in Zone 6’x/jT/A/a • S-S-V ♦ J { i ■ ^ . .*-■ 1s • • A.■ H ouse \ • ZL,t 'X 4<?.2.s ■ /284-.) • •LENGTH WIDTH • • X 2(^.3 8 6os.d ••^.3 ■ X Z.o 0 h • ^ •• X • • ) . . .' *.l V« •f ^ r • 1 ' • ) ^ t * ‘ A X r ■ M 8 : 7-/' B. • t %. Garage \ • *. •« X • S3 • C. • 1 D riveway _ •- tr» • •• •X •••a • ze&^st • ^/r 4-X s, ^a ZZ. o.:- • y/^fO^ALK^ Sidewalk • ‘4t3 X /s ^0 • i €4 • Z40 >3.3 X 9 • a 24. • ^**TlO • • 7.5 • X • 25 z/x?': E.’at I0/ D eck ^T^tAU • •• • • X •• * **«• • mm • , sss F.Landscape • • 3.-7 X • • S7 AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ ,4 X 74 . a #• • 9^ PLASTIC------ SHEETING ► ♦ • • • X • • • i • • 1 X \• m • Uyooa T/MSfiS R. Qthfr /73 X 8 89 . Total H ardcover IN \ Zone €?oJ ' S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F.«• S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Total Property Area m Zone oo S.F B ^90? ' '4.m ^oSoo X . » 9m ' \ 100 - _% ‘2^*1 hd-f dc h'U. tLAbh^ci" *7 < . “; *rr95 fO,6oa sr.27 % *• • 99 ^ •*• r*i *m999 • • • 9 9mm9t V: . .vr-,' p- ■ . >' . ■- ■ '•ir--;' ■^li. « % & £f Ir' I « % is Ln- f * \.A V*' V i 1J ^ •^ J ♦ i-‘'i -JteR'A... h 1'"’ ■\l^ IM*. JMll :j <ISiyM|i 1 |llitaii!aS^&^ *______ •■1^ y ! J j 11H,»i»j>UM»»U>ii%mm mi^mimW^mm^m SCIIKDl LK OF r)RA\MN(;S EXISTING PLANS SITE PI.AN LEVEI. ONE PLAN LOWER LEVEL PLAN LAKE ELEVATION EAST ELEVA riON WEST ELEVATION SECTION AA SECTION RB PROPOSED PLANS I *m 3 4 5 6 7 8 SITE PLAN LEVEL ONE PLAN LOWER LEVEL PLAN LAKE ELEVATION WEST ELEVA1 ION EAST ELEVATION SECTION AA SECTION BB STRl'CTlIRE / DETAILS WINDOW DE-TAILS STRUCTURAL PLANS STRUCTURALELE VS STRUCTURAL DETAILS STRUCTURAL DETAILS 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 rONTAI'lN ______________ _______ Oilier: Tom Si ( hfr>l BerlhUuinr / (612) R74 I9V9 Architect: llm <;el«ler /(6I2) M74*tll59 Knulneer: Wotne Lannn 11612) 4HI-9I20 mJSKTHIAUME RESIDEagE PRELIMINARY PLANS NO I l-OR ('ONS lKlJCnON tHCUCia^cB 4»xUTU'iVTiM>i •^rsitaiL'iH Missr\K4u M»s».r*LiT^ •?«>*t4it f')1 1 > 1 ''j ■J 1 ”> ..V j G O o G O G O O O G O O n ., • > :v ilv, iV' EXISTING PLANSA xi srAij;.. 3/32"=r-0” ttltO*!ULJB AfKXTlATf*' HHCl-IVTO** A^t^WC»WTH « i \ ^ \ ‘3 { ; } 1 > ‘ / 0/ ' 7 o LEtlAl. UESI RIHTION j Ail of Tf *<1 A UciiMcre^l \muS Sarvn* No 3<M eicepi th*» pm l>m| Northerly of ih« foDowiog de»crtbrd Unt Uq(mAtn| «the SouihcMiefly corner uf irtoi B in Mid Rrgmarvd l.nnd Survey ihtncr South'* nicrljr dong • line dri»a through • poiM on the btM line « thown on Mid Rrgittcrvd « Survey. AO feet Nonhocttorly from tti l^:eneu*on okh the Souhenstvi) line of mi4 Frect A to the thore of l ike Minnrionk* and there tcrminaung V-vT V U:4.MT!llWTi:AltJlA Pr-W, CollU * a *kU7.,v,, THE B^tTHIAUME RESffiENCE tMeo«*Jiiitntx-uuillciitllHT^^ utTM Misscm)t.t» mikmvita j;*>r *ci:ir4ii5«-rA<i Proa eri#iudSt^cf CtdIU A luc. I*f7 SITE PLAN^;xI.s■^N(^ scAu;: r'=60-n /N tMEotiaii AWX-uuillciitllHT^^ MIKMVITA j;*>4 *ri:ir4ii5«-rA<i iiAir i::**! - u-m^j -r.- . ',T »f I v>~.- })i\'\I '•» I i I I ) } \ J ) :) y f i •% 4 % / J J J j •«% "j o 0 THEJEItHIAUME RESIDE^^^^^level lEEANia i.^Ti i::») iMtt)uk ?»“n^lTu*«ai!riu«i A-'tsEru»c^m missi%h 4.i»^ ?5«x •••n•>»' ia » «w / •> * •»V ) t ') -s I T; ■) 3» 3 / J liTTi wr U’4- 2V-41' H*.C" n'-i* . -• • • •• • ifi^^ ------I7*.|i--------------------------- ---------------------------—----------- THElERJHlAUME RESIDENCE faQ^ER LEVEL ,PL^Ng| tMt utiMLOt tMi% »*ciM. fcitsHi snn.1% shl4 >•*):»i'« iiJ« I ; .f *) .?i^dkr /^^VvT^A v^. *• A <^C^.^.r r:: P’ "■ Cl- > lHTl»in«iiRiiit>ii. Ill » r. -A !? .. tAftrtu imiitL iM •_ »ih cri.iMV/ It. lot IQ t— ’>j«r' •S' a_ i:.'"f T'-r ...iiiiii'^ >-> sSHisr O'.^ _*’ -w V. '• -*xxT'^''-»»i^\‘M'“ • ^ i^;>>ti“^'''A__ '^:'4 j §:.c><''''-^CV}5 • ‘'^A> r ^'l;uv. j% » %-----*r-^ ** *''3 4 iS SIliii Spr"'’ v/<r,v.,4 -»4 — \> THE b„eirthiaume residence lake elevation /"\ tHtuuau 4Mua%TU':c:i'U-VTaNA>t-Ntc»itiii sisnl^kjuq Mi suiir^ 1S4M (Q4:ii'«tt*« 14% **i:>i'*ii:^l•4t^ i::4j I. / i t / f / # $ i / 4 j I ^ .;^r.Srsfr i .^:7 iHTi■ iiiiir»r>t>w III r_ rif &.!£!Jt Tt»«#wivnowt»iB. to t................ M4*tiiii»nnMm*n.»a iM v_________ ttvn. I rif*n.«a i« • tfv rt**i.WT» W- *> y_ EAST ELEVATION^l-XISriNd •''t A1 !•.. V12 UAlt i2i*«J iSnSiiirjli5«iuhSaw.Ts .N':-rr;^-tH wissrv«.i. »isM»ri..jj*. *i;.i .hm r» I.’* ! . 1 ^ . I-r;' i J I ^ J yV r "^V/tT-''-^ J VI V . • <JC2^r aW“^ l>ffairjtimot/ti, iii ^ c: lS-w-M>V^ -J UWratgVtLt*A.HT>g »l t* liMTB UfVgrWWJ^^^ TflfiJSRXHlAUMERHffiS^iTHTonTriTAi55lMir;c;ci.ivTi^ oiNtt kjuh vism i. MissiinT^ •••^ .•!:,• 4ii^« r%» ,♦l..•4ll.‘* ISLELEV^IME Ih * ’4^; «l:]!«lS:.*2ti!____ ftw r» irwnoirt > n %m t _ . UKfm itiTominwn.; b. !•• o <^'v :alcr r-^"' C. i/V-vAq^^^V' 'V /i? -7. "--.V, xcy.^ I • o:^-^;-r;;;:rx> AT «h. irr' ^ £i?'s'2 3' '-^-' s "' Si / 4. A 4 — r#“ —<► - j #* - ^f--------- V4r - ■ 4----------------------ir4---------------------- THMMIPIAUMERESSgSfil VM^»iiT>saiiwm^cIH'i^^os.sf .%im oim ta^ ,*i.>ia ..- SEC! ION AA„ .srAi.lv. MM = V4r\SLAl•;xl.snNrl UATL i:.'U r.‘; . A.-'-' ' .r *~ »- 'V V ^V-----C.rV^' dkr Vx ,A—Vj XX^*^ IN'" *‘^'1 1^4j iKTnin«tint>«<n. iti r •m rujNo rB. iffT ir ^ ’^' —^'■<? ^r'"Y>r'>A 7^^'* *'f *»e«arT n,vV|^*N^ \ .c-- • v: I f'-"'r^ <: cc.v. A Xl"...■ . _____ ' >: ■ 1 I ^ V-. i--"--nfvv. ^..t:^-en>'-Shr--> wmmm^mmk lurrwiMtxiwf'H. tm r MAfTB tlMOOM riM n.« B. IM « LCVB. I rtNft. >B. too «- i^»cti^a^iriLiNii tt. «• j_______1_ iiSSl^iSSSlilif V. ^ --\ N 7-:-/<^/::-/y/:;y/y^^^^^ THE BERTHTAUME RESIDENCE A 3035C'AS('<)I‘OIN rU()AI) _ __ORON’O, MlNNI-lSO l A TiitiJtiAls ^v»ji lAtl* :«;;ri iviosVwNii m'ith Mis ’vr\M«.'i mismwit* ?»«^« ti;ii‘«ii?i t*i:t i'« ii»« SECTION BB l-.XISIlNd SCA1.I-: ;U32'=l -()' O uail i-; I •i S { ') f n •'** THE bmIHIaume residence TMtOtlU Atry um* Avn»Lt ii>ctw . i5^' ^i:i r< fAt (JENERAL NOIESThese plans arc inlcmlcH for cost cslinuting purposes and not for construction. Please note the following;STRUCHTR All PI.ANSThese sketch plans (p.tgcs 18-21) were prepare*! by I.ars*>n T-nginecring of Minnesota ami arc inicnded to provide basic information related to cost estimates. All questions regarding the specifics of these plans should be addres-sed to Wayne Ijirson. KIMSHF.S All exterior finishes arc to match the existing house. Floor finishes on the main level ate to match the existing oak fltw. Lower level fioor finish to be sclcctc*! by owner. All interior walls to be 5/8" gyp bd, taped, sanded and painted. New deck to match. ^^KCHAN^CAI. Mechanical to be determined by contractor • utilize existing system as possible. KLKCTRICAL IVtvidc allowance for electrical fixtures (recessed &/or light track) for the proposed addition. Contractor to dctenninc whether additional service will be retjuired. WINDOWS New "curtain wall" window details mc shown as worn! (page 17). Alternate may be metal, pre-finished, curtain wall system. Note operable windows shown on elevations. Heat reflective glass in all fixed windows. SKYI.IGHTS Skylights shown to be bid as an alternate. RAILINGS All existing exterior iron railings to be icmovcd and replaced with 5-linc, painted pipe railings as shown. Details to approx, match existing interior rails at spiral stair. Sleeve fittings to attach to deck. SITEWORK Sitework to include finished grading. s«l, etc. Any additional work to be determined by ow ner. PROPOSED PLANS .SCALF:: 3/32"= r-0" i > *) > V *- ■ ■>■•> ■: V I FOAI. PESrRIFTION: All of Trtct A Rcginervd fjuid Survey No J*M acryt Uisi part l>nnf Noitlicrhriv of ihc foUoviM dcKiibrd liar bcf inaii^ ■ Ifcc Stymientcrly of troa D in Mid KrgiMvcd l4nd I^urvcv dieacc South* ntcrly •kMif • liiir drawn ihrovf h a poiai o« the bate linr ai ihowa o« Mtd Rrgiticrrd 1 And Survey AO fm North*e««rly from ai lotairctjoa wuh the StMilieaaicrly liac ^ imd Tract A to the ahorc of Lake Muinctonha and there tenaiaating u-sm Ati-jt awv«| t'«dn<i h (#r««a«r^ Iw. April T. IH7 THE BERTHIAUME RESIDENCE X 3035 CASCO IX)INT ROAD ORONO. MlNNIiSOI A SITE PLAN PROIX)SI I) SCAU-:: l"=60-0 /'N THfcititLa AUBx;urtf '2«i:«vii>mM «ai»icriiH;TN 'MtHs(Ar«a.u wiHvtsiiTA s.mm iaiM'«ii5« rai ni:»iHii)«DAiTTHiS i > i: 1 % y r 1 j •s J ) •» J lilt I ISf 25*4!* ; *. ? ? •. * ■ i’ ■ " 11^52 --------jl^5------------- ---— — ■iNTW WAI.1.S ■■IXIS'nNOWAllS '// RI.MOVL *, Al rs ^ ^ —---------10 THEJBEIHIAUME RESIfigNgE LEVEL 1 PLANf^ PROIKISI'I) SCAl.li: 3/12"=l ’-0'kLJI THf oci«.ni 4»KM uui' :«i:o.ivTo<i <«vrMtc hh/ih » winsi^lita iuo* - tisti ta* i*t:t ta iis«Mai I r;iAj 1 A jssssstasei b \ Ie ; r ■ f - UlttlKf. • ii>j:i ' 4 ^ < .<■ A': ■•■■ • V* 'If*- >• • *••«*« • «>4 jfinrw 11INI-.W WAI LS ___ __________ M. JBL^ fiilEllHi^uME REsn^iM__h8£ggJjXgkaMBi 'iMMiia AiioiiSMOcjil«Tu> «»i-tr liifH »isst*ni» »)«. ,..:.i-4»i« rA« ,.ijn-4ii« t*J • - V ? "V rakr ^^.v*vTV <^v— A.•r? f--^*\i 0^ J /' • V.wy*- *r •' 'w. it#€if Nfvtonr/a iff j r iwTriiint »K>Dc«n. Ill t V—V. V/0 • <''^^^‘'■^'>^v, ;/]!)'J‘A 'V i »^<,AA^ .'V'A.' ’■ r'-L}^^'- <*A• - ^W V ^-v r.S=Ji;^j^_.'^'*' criiNii'n. iM r Tiiri# »iHfKi«ri( n. loft I M^rrm iii9«(j«>m pinn. ^ o. im o LPVn. I PINPL*B. 100 • ____________ |ji)% i» Lcv p f im t« iNO • r/ w r______ THE BERTHIAUME RESffiENCE 12 LAKE ELEVATION /"N i'U()i*()Si-:i)scAi.i;: ,V32'=r n Imi (jfi'^i nA»«K uTi > M::rTi*«it«*« avimt »>cth' mission* i» M«*4'4i:»r*t»P» f4\ ioi:)i'^ n» U4lt ili>j • 'ey' r—/ ^ v^vtP' -^,3 tc:^' e^‘ r^ Wl!*!'* «'»1«*1 fit iiljL^jg i?-» r*t'»??'9r »i!r_______irnmmmmmmmmMmwmhmi ynrty !•, •« r_________ fct^rrn »B»»mM nw r%. < b. imo* irvn.inKn.fn iw«r IIMWpMt si \.y- Y/\ Y/a ;;.f. } zs-‘- ' ./'“V"'i ■// A // A- jty. •/■// Vw MM <M*t <MM mmmm- m\i i 4 M ■ tn«i9i.rvn. Mi. »fT «CL u r i£*2®trvH.nwn.«g n ^ PI rr r x’ 1 t mmmmmmi t: ►*— i*^ ^,-----------------—. .........................- ■«•«> -'*# w ^ ----- — _ .(Ktn ADomuN) THE BERTHIAUME RESIDENCE X .mSCASrOI’niNTROAIl _______ _ ORONO, MINNI-SOIA . .. . ^ JZ ^ M T. •. J » . m . ^ ^ ft ■ ft. . M .. .. r. ...'.r ft ft ft^ ^'’.« .a<«. At«a a*«. ««•»fMf oiiAH AMi»tATt»';«;;<iiVTi N A\f*»tr fc'LiM Wissi wtsMwir^ ?s«4 •«i;t•’« iu» .»i:»r’«im WEST ELEVATION PROPOSI-I) __________S(’AI. •: V32'= -O" 13 (% UML lil-U t‘\ C "tv • vi—.r \ > «• r^J i r'’ ' r!^: “b 'vr' >/v.-V /• • vr—, $ “- .. . !<\ r y-' • \.A^, V ..-'nr- ><^''/-" « ^' >-ri' .^‘■^^U;--?,-,/ ?: i»nt>B«BRM>r >rt iii i i rr IHI1»ti IOC I Toc(« »ist«)WC' n. 100 I Moctra iia«iMiMr'«in.'n. im • i r\n I risn < n lou o U>«r* i CA n rIM (i n imi «n. «« j Sc.>^ Sc^v ^ mm, jiiiiiiasis (Miw AOUmO*f ) THE BERTHIAUME RESIDENCE _JL m^5 CASCO IDINT ROM) ORONO. MINNI„SO I A J |MtJt7« r» Atm* UTU'.'C.'divtos 4\tMLt oJlim mIsslamjUs MiMsimiT« iimn iOi:ii'«ti*o f*o Ai;)i'4it?« ir II- — 14 EAST elevation ™ I’ROCOSI-.I) SCAI I-: V)2"=l’-(r |>*T| i;i*ij ^ / ^ £ f: r <xz • q: <or-^‘Sh^<CC l^\»r fi^ ,-Sy^ e-w^^ <iC^ •*/ uy ^C- 12.'' , , ,.4p--------------r4t--------« , ►------------------- ------------ ,r4»--------------------------- 1 AUI'MI oNi -------4 15 THE BERTHIAUME RESIDENCE JL 3035 ('AS(’0 inMN l ROAD ORONO. MINNI SOTA SECTION A AGP l'R()l>()SSi;i) S('AI.i:: 3/32'=l'.(rlSLJ TNfurittA 4Mii-i-.m ;«:;iuvToN Avistri»K.iM MisHio^iiu wismj»,t% j?«*« ,ti;ii-«i!*< ,♦l.*•r4ll*«iMit i:;.«ii f 9 ! 'i 1 } I ; i • % I i I J ^WVvi ^ S • *' “^ , V ^'' '• ' V ,• A „ c^o^^vw • vr • v,---,c,,„.. .c^ V y\A^<.. I --J THE BERTHIAUME RESIDENCE X 3035 ('Asro POINT ROAD____________________ORONO. MINNI-SO IA 16 SECTION BB pROPosin S(’AI.I-;:3/32"=r-0' THiuitaus AUKA uIcs' :T:;a i*auN avihuc aount m'ih Vi\mk .u . MiNistauiA }j«>«'<»i:iiN it» r^i iftt:ii?< tin r»^Ti Jr i' [• 4 ' t I I ; #> t 4 'TOB^SRIP1'*^U*^E RES|gE|<CE STRUCTURE/BEI^ DAie >fims mm I»mnn^rr%t Uri CU*ffO« AVwic mCTH ' UtWtAKUt > MIH^UUTA I• (^2» f AX Hl2) r« MaiteiiyitiyiifettSil I •' i i m, } ' \ •: \ > I V r / 6J.'4 yr ----• I |SSt Iw\nNG(tlASS(2 81-4 X2 • 3*4’flXED PANIX) THEJMIHIAUME RESffiENCE NO! K: riM I) \Kkm 2 ( KMUtl IM- UIMKm HI^;rNSlON FRIOU T(' •'ABRK ATION 17 WINDOW DETAILS PROPOS!-;!)SCAU-: .r=l -0’ -y ,1 r f: V VI «( t N On i *> ■ (2^or J^tSTX- VSC 0& \\'^/»* 'Tji zr I 3 u « ;?• Ji," pL'iWOOP Ca-I ’V.iA'*. M.L. LCJk/4T MtiJ 4‘ Op C«op » 5i«*r*-i6»m terjv / SI o*r -(t> TS^o^^. ju«trS Hfcwiitfr---------— ilila k ^rjr-35ox-ii%* / 0 04 * #dS ‘i/4'^Tii. PU|Wil*0 --------------------------------■* (?>P^LOO^ p(?AiAlHC» THE BMIHIAUME RESIDE,age HVMKDfylAHMH INQlimM or MMUU »|«lA«miMAO WMniUfllMI WMfftOTIMIII (llt)MMUI fAl(«.f)MI't2«t o smycTu^Aj,a UAtr TMiOfi^YTA'^Jcum^:cJcxBauj*A%L.sttiuciH Misst>»iT4 4i;.r4im.fA* 4«:»i'4H?» -1 Hit ~tfcr ~ ■- ^ - .- . ,>., ,. -■ ,»■ ,--------------- 1*U 0 ( c^L, V-©viv U/awl . En_£Ni atioa /0 Wau ^ eus^/*.Tlftfc/ THE BERTHIAUME RESIDENCE A 3035 C’ASCO IH)INTR()AD OKONO. MINNl-SOTA IMItOlllMGINlfMNGOf MIMSOTA (|1}|4lMi;i >AI (112)411 f?tl 19 STRUCTURALf^ SKinCII PLANS N()S('Al.i:lL_jl TMeucmm AAsia.uTt«> }«::cLi'm>s *nr»M< Misst^4 *• mismjuta ai :i r« h;y r«« (%i:< i-u im k pLiyJocO JOISTS ai4*oz. #4 nV rsiQt^" iipf Apr AC^H/retf ^/e. cvgitMri^ $L- II K 14. MU’M U*<{ (D D€TAIU- 0 CoNtxax^ot^ ! . THE BERTHIAUME RESIDENCE X 101S CASCO I’OINT ROAD ORONO MfNNI SOTA INCOeULCIl AUUCUTU< XriUJMTUh AVlKUt II>CTH. MIHMaIv«.U> Ml«»St»>TA )?«>4 i*i:i llJ« r%l i«i:ilHlt9« ORONO. MINNI-SO I A -5- \H»^\K)CtoUK oc ^ 0 Cvot-S 0Tist oowki OcrSriV^ PfKMWLer lAMSOH IMMIfnmo Of MllWlOfA UI4 UAOOIMMO WMIIf ItMIIAn. miMSOU Mill ilUMII tin fu (112) U1 I2f 1 20 STRUCTURALpiSKinCIl PLANS NO.scalp ;kLjy UAU ^:^*u m: ,'V' r--iAz:»»'>»'4 *'■' ^STS-Siorl stTsm- (fe*4 wvioCb tr> I ^ ^touM ^ ^ Ft<oR» p<(>r 0 C^uutAt^ P«TA* <— _ Tlpi^ 4- T'H/V (f^ %*)• i; OMi N W *. !*VV T .T !L / ^Ba3C A.&«t4s ^ 1 5 ^ -* ^^5 :? LU—3 5« ^ J{<!j ICV/t* p/KJU ^UUUAJ A __a__ •pn,. f. u/Vf (2>'^o«A/ccn^i^ DirpKit*(D ^Lom,*^ 0Ar$r THE B£RX,H1AUME RESIBENgE P«M«Olt lAAtOH lllGiNf mm Of MmOtOtA lUI lAMfli ROM) Wtin ItARlAAt lOMISOTAUIII (lUtlll ttlt »A)t (I12| 4111211 21 ’^nftMWi AWiriATf«<?«?ifTJimw<ilVI>.Lgi<H.'TM MISHL^nJLtl Ml*»stanTA S3«« ' i«i:» !'♦ •»«- MX »H2jr4 ll« STRUCTURAL SKUK’HIMANS N()S(’AI.I-; U4TC 2r;j^ . Jl TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator COUNCIL MEETING may 10 1993 CnY OF ORONO DATE:May 3, 1993 SUBJECT: #1816 Kent E. and Susan Swanson, 3229B Casco Circle - Variances - Resolution Brief Review of Application and Planning Commission Recommendation In 1982 applicants received approval of multiple variances to allow a 10 ’ addition to the existing attached garage and a two story family room addition at the lakeside that encroached into the lakeshore protected area. A second floor 3’ wide upper level deck was also approved that was located within the 0-75’ setback. The current application involves a second story den (24’ x 24’) to be installed over the existing attached garage and 6V4 ’ x 12 ’ a two story entry addition. Both structures will encroach the average lakeshore setback line, the entry addition at a 2-3’ encroachment and the second story den addition would be approximately 28’ in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The second story deck within the lakeshore yard and approved in 1982 shall be removed and replaced with a landing and spiral staircase all located within the 0-75’ setback area (results in 56 s.f. reduction of hardcover). Excessive hardcover exists within the 0-75’ and 75-250’ setback. There will be a 56 s.f. reduction of hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area and a 2 s.f. increase for portioris of overhang that will extend beyond the existing paved entry area. Many of the hardships set forth in the 1982 approval were once again restated by applicants in seeking approval of the current variance application. Review Exhibit E. The Planning Commission questioned the possibility of the removal of additional hardcover with the current proposal, specifically, the play tower in the lakeshore yard that was installed since 1982 or other non-stmctural improvements such as walkways. Applicants claimed the brick or paved walks were unique to the property. As for the play tower applicants claim it was built to replace an old boat house that had existed on the property at the lakeshore for years. Members acknowledged that the front or lakeside view windows were not impacted by the proposed improvement because of the curvature of the shoreline. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the variance application as proposed and adopted the findings as set forth in Exhibit A and as in the former 1982 resolution. Zoning File #1816 May 3, 1993 Page 2 Please review the Planning Commission minutes of the April 19ih meeting and the enclosed staff report to the Planning Comission for more background and detail on this review. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. iimMiiiHi 11II Jillli ^>3 s r" A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) AND 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE ijfl816 WHEREAS, Kent E. Swanson and Susan S. Swanson (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3229B Casco Circle within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1333, as filed with the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the construction of a 6'^’ x 12 ’ entry addition to the street side of the residence and a 24’ x 24’ second story den addition above the attached garage and a 5’ x 3’ landing and spiral staircase at the lakeside of the residence. Portions of this construction shall be located in front of the average lakeshore setback line where no such encroachment is allowed and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2. Applicants seek approval of hardcover variances within the 0-75 ’ setback area, existing at 578 s.f. or 3.2% and proposed 522 s.f. or 2.9% where none is allowed and in the 75-250 ’ setback area hardcover exists at 7,515 s.f. or 46.2% and is proposed at 7,517 s.f. or 46.2% where only 4,066 s.f. or 25% is allowed. MLnnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1816. Page 1 of 5 H ntiiiit ’ -j-i 2. 3. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District requiring a 16 acre or 21,780s.f. per residential unit. The property consists of 33,801 s.f. or .77 acres. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 19, 1993 and recommended approval of the proposed v'ariances based upon the following findings and hardships: A. The property meets the area and lot width standards of the LR-IC Zoning District. B. 4. The existing house was placed on the property prior to the 75’ l.i>:eshore setback requirement; the existing house met the original 50’ lakeshore setback standards at the time the home was constructed. C. The pie shaped lot has placed severe restrictions on the building envelope. D. Over 50% of the lot area is located within the 0-75’ setback area. E. 3,500 s.f. of the hardcover within the 75-250’ setback consists of a shared drive that serv'es 32^9A and 3229C, Casco Circle. F. There is little impact on the lakeshore views of the taceni homes. The homes are located on a curved peninsula with view windows facing lake. G. vStaff has received no negative comments from the adjacent neighbors w ho have been notified of the proposed improvement. Tlie City Council has considered this application ircluding tlie findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City siaft, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 5. The City Council finds that the conditioas existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fi'e hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserv'e a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22. Subdivisions 1 (D) and 2 to permit the construction of a two story entry addition, a second story den addition above attached garage and the installation of a 5 ’ x 3’ landing and spiral staircase at the lakeside of the residence, subject to the following conditions: Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (May 10, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be pimishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title ot the propeny. 1. 2. 3. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of May, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing insinimenr was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 i TO:Mavor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATI April 15, 1993 SUBJECT: #1816 Kent E. Swanson. 3229B Casco Circle - Variances - Public Hearings Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) - Applicant proposes second story addition within average lakeshore setback area (refer to Exhibit F). Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover review. A. 0-75’ setback = 17,537 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 514 s.f. or 2.9% 0,1. v/i »U J Proposed = 522 s.f. or 2.9% (56 s.f. hardcover removal with upper level deck and replacement with landing and circular stairs) B.75-250’ setback area = 16,264 s.f. Allowed = 4,066 s.f. or 25% Existing = 7,515 s.f. or 46.2% Proposed = 7,517 s.f. or 46.2% Increase = 2 s.f. (results from first level of entry addition that extends beyond paved area) Hardcover Variance = 3,451 s.f. or 21.2% Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) - Lot coverage Total area = 33,801 s.f. Allowed = 5,070 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2.930 s.f. or 8.6% Proposed = 2,946 s.f. or 8.7% Zoning File #1816 April 15, 1993 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B * Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Neighbors Acknowledgment Forms E - Resolution Approving ’82 Variances F - Survey G - Plan Approved with 1982 Application H - Architect’s Comments I - Hardcover Fact Sheets J - Floor Plan/Elevations - Second Story Den Addition K - Floor Plan/Elevations - Entr>' Addition Description of Request In 1982 applicant received approval of setback and hardcover variances to allow a 10’ wide addition to the existing attached garage. A two story family room addition at the lakeside that encroached approximately 2.5’ into the 75’ setback area and 3 wide upper level connecting decks, portions of which are located within the 0-75 setback area. Review Exhibit E, the resolution that granted the ’82 variances and refer to Exhibit G, the site plan submitted with the ’82 application. The current application involves the installation of a two story entry addition. At the first floor the addition measures 6 l/2’xl2’ and the upper level 3’9"xl2’. There will be a 3 overhang. The majority of entry addition will be placed over existing hardcover. The next phase of improvement involves a second story den to be constructed over the attached garage that measures approximately 24’x24’. Portions of both structural improvements are located in front of the average lakeshore setback and as the intensification of structures take place within an area where excessive hardcover exists, hardcover approvals are required. The final phase involves the removal of an upper level deck and replacement with a small landing and spiral staircase. The improvement results in a reduction of approximately 56 s.f. of strucniral hardcover. The improvement also involves master bedroom alterations, major window replacement and other interior improvements having no impact on building envelope. The e.xpansions to the existing building envelope are the 12’x6’ entry addition, upper level den addition and staircase on lakeshore side located within the 0-75’ setback area. Upon a site inspection of the property, staff noted that a play tow-er had been installed in the lakeshore yard since the ’82 review. The structure is 8’x8’ adding 64 s.f. of hardcover within protected area. Zoning File /S'1816 April 15, 1993 Page 3 Hardship Statement Many of the findings of the original 1982 variance review are still appropriate for the current review. There is little impact on the lakeshore views of the adjacent homes as view windows would appear to be not impacted by the additions. The property is located on a curved peninsula. The property has an unusual pie shape. Over 50% of the lot area is located within the 0-75’ setba.k. 3,500 s.f. of the hardcover within the 75-250’ setback consists of a shared driveway that serves 3229A and 3229C Casco Circle. The adjacent neighbors have acknowledged the improvement plan (review Exhibit D). Staff has received no comments from the adjacent neighbors. Issues for Consideration 1.Are there existing hardcover improvements that may be considered for removal, i.e. children’s play to'ver in lakeshore yard, reduction in area of walkways, other? 2. Is there a visual impact of second story additions upon neighboring pioperties ’ view windows? Your recommendation must address variances needed for structural alterations within lakeshore yard, new construction and intensification of structure where excesses of hardcover exist and for upper level expansions of structure portions of which encroach average lakeshore setback area. In developing your hardship statement refer to resolution approving ’82 variance and hardship statement listed above. Options of Action 1. Approval as proposed; or 2. Approval as amended; or 3.Denial. CITY OP ORONJ — VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ^ - - ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 ^ (no change from original application/ ^ Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) il c r- PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 3229 B Casco Circle, Orono, MN 55391 Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 2.0.. 1 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Prope'^tiT Acquired _____(< /~7 o_________(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: _X_residential - -other (specify )^ “.ITY OF QROHO Lr*h\y.rc nccrrcI xnnn^tm %j* t o.u*u i X w*w*Vit.V'VVV'V Af rr^/ f7c: />,* ClIm X w‘ w* V/w V' W' V V C* Zoning District_______________________________________________________________20JL r-’-C .V APPLICANT Naune Kent E. and Susan S. Swanson Phone (home) C^CH 1 75. Oi RtCFIPT-THAFK YOUPhone (worlc) Add re s s: 3229 B Casco Circle City: Orono 7* L 0\>On rnn i Ijn i JJj ■ rTi:^uu^ijy/ ill* Zip: 5539ii:£if' OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home), ^71 "~11Q^ Name /M. ^ 1- - - - Phone (work)- - - Address: .^^5^ I - DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $, Describe request in detail: We request the removal of a deck on the lakP- side and the extension of the entry over existing hardcover..----------------------------— VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setbaclc:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIPAJBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual propert conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: — • t — I ^ ^ A 1 ^ w" ^The “pie shaped" configuration nf the p roperty Places a Urge pgrgentaqg of tba property within the lakp <;pi-h;^rk maJ difficulty coinplying with hardcover property within the ij-Hii setbyk stl|ie^builMna-h|k| wDiiid cause a net decrease in hardcover." (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. _Completed Application Form 2. _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 85i"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic surv.ey .(existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5"xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5"xll"). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date h /9 ? OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. /ft) p, 's % GOVT LOT 6 I GOVT LOT 9 ^4r m 1^ Ti.»^r 1^- k RUN DATE 03/2A/93 BATCH 006 i-HEHiEPir4 ccxjrrrY property iNroRMATiori system PROPERTY 0HNER5 LIST REPORT NO, PI<#35^01 PAGE 35PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAKE/ADDR 58 20-117-25 .000205229 CASCO CIR DAVIO P PARUPSKY OAVIO PARUPSKY 5229 CASCO CIR HAYZATA »t4 55591 '58 20-117-25 95 000505229 CASCO CIR MARY SUSAN SJ'IAUSOfl MARY SUSAN SHANSON 5229 CASCO CIR HAYZATA rtl 55591 58 20-117-25 95 000903229 CASCO CIR TCF BANK SAVINGS SUSAN 8 DAVIO SALERNO 5229 CASCO CIR HAYZATA MN 55591 < > A T 4 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAy»*AVER NAME/ADOR 56 20-117-25 95 0005 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MARY SUSAN SHANSON MARY SUSAN SHANSON 5229 CASCO CIR HAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 95 0015 05255 CASCO CIR D M SPILSETN 8 P D SPILSETH DAVID M SPILSETH 5255 CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 95 0016 05231 CASCO CIR J E COOPER 8 J E COOPER J E COOPER 8 J E COOPER 5231 CASCO CIR HAYZATA MN 55591 'I PROP ADDR 0I«4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 58 20-117-25 95 0017 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED D C PLAIN 8 P L PLAIN D CHARLES PLAIN 5227 CASCO CIR • HAYZATA. MN 55591 58 20-117-25 95 0018 05227 CASCO CIR .0 C PLAIN 8 P L PLAIN D CHARLES PLAIN 5227 CASCO CIR HAYZATA MN 55591 ^•5^ ftvrK- TOTAL BATCH 006 00008 I c /# • I r>• • • i \:v . ■• •• » •*' i .. n/n * I 1 •»\ V- r ■ vi4-‘v -V • ^:V : ■' r I, 'v; ‘ ■ ^ ' } f . •(- ■ tv, • ' »l« W. ' > - . ^ • ’ •. :A'..•!>V -"H- ^ A . w ' C'h- .. 4 • -5. >.rr''v r:. •;. V* • ' / A-' CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE . REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COWTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIE ; DATI C im ,v > u: i ■ i I » » < I / • A • > • * • ' .< f;',.V; •' / '• * V * 1^9*^ • •• / > • . • -'J' ** . •« , «• *. V* , » • • r , . • V ‘ , V I ftv^ J ’ I I I • i n -Vr r... -4 - 1,^. ». «■*! • - . 1 • *1 » t J • * * i • ... r ■ ?:• tii’-t-''• ‘ • r if I ; ii; ‘f-> f. •* CP I i Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) David Paruopki [print name(s) 1 f •^.':»2Q-A Casco Cir<^lo [print address] ^ nlans for the proccsed improvement or proposea use of thehave reviewed the plans for tne p . r-"erred to as Land Use property located at Application. No._ _ _• I (we) understand that in executing this (are) not as)<,ed to declare ^ CounViT^that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm n^oposed neighbor's project or usethe improvement plans and that the p.oposec n y recuires Council approval. "A PjToperty Owner Date 3 Property Owner of 2??Q-C r;^^m Circle------------------- [print address] property located at --- - - --- - - - - -- sXpplication No. _____.• . ^ ^.v,rs-(- in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am I (we) understand that in disaooroval of the property or use (are) not asked to Council that I (we) am (are) aware of but merely to confirm proposed neighbor's project or use the improvement plans and that tne prop rsquires Council approval. Date Property Owner Owner Date Property If you have any yoa“Lmment^s’'’to’'"the Building s roVy '•.•V i£L *r* \£. a=' •: • ■ .• -'>rj 1^/4 f<« .* •: <V • ••"•y City of 0R0I\0 R!:30LUTI0N Of THE CITY COUNCIL NO. . • •i'. ; •/ArrnoviNj a variwce V \n“ VS 'r-‘ ■ *■ '<OC,\7ED.^* -2.9-3 C.\SJO CIRCLE or,«l=ed „4 t.*f t M M ■ » • • 'or'ts'’* '■■''' Orono'?* '''1 *"‘' “• -or th« proto«.on c- tn. Publlc'ho;it.?"L?«/l “S‘,%’,”;t'’2.r?I?ir “Sr MMPOC«^0 ______ * «nG •i/ #• • —' V I M Jonlnp Cod*, Kont'sujn ””h,J%fp“‘S'’! J^.ZOl anj 3).202 a; tha Orono Po,Uter,d .and Surv.y .0. 1333; P«P.r* ,'.• H ;|v. c-.n.nti of"ii;; '?? n«35hbor., writ’tM";‘iro«r‘**“ ^ "*’‘a« eh* tollowinj tlndinga'’o' fl"e,’* *-=''‘toot, cha City Caunaii:'--' . 1* located Suhlntho'^LfTr”!’^"^' v^v;*’-Cv fe‘- •;■> -: - '-'di.trict that re?uiro8 ! ■■:- :'•• • ^Vy " rev residential lot! of 21,730 «f - v. r;'^ b 2 ) 2T a C t s ja ** 4 M ^ 3 ..... —b • .1 * * ’ ^ I '‘*s *•. • * \ .«rf»v •» I 5?^-. JL« ' * ““ standard, o^Vh.;5L,^b^5v.. ,i «Vi‘?ff"?.!}?'.''' pi^ji o netback (rftmenf i- ffii’tri •' ' !iv ' > .V V ^ ‘ "• ^ llfi • v' p.;.,. s&.523:,5:?“ . ' .. . VA-.V. ■•r^ju r-WiSS^i 4# ■'* ^ # »k. -A .................................... mm -j--- - "I? '""tit 3«%«: i,■ ^: .> O?* th'T lot area !• unbulldahiX Hi k- &. v;^TJ SS-ii. ■ vvVf - .*>• ^ r Hi 4 , i Oty of ORONO i. I* .' v-« ■V RESOLUTION OF TH£ CiTV COUWCik MO. propertl*!; ^ ^ •nared driveway for abottiiif t« on t)Mrn>n“];?**”*** S««o*tii» u, sj.f,n ii!„ ;r;25‘.v: w'^f'.fHail!* '’*”■, «.. SJ"2UJj»r '^noao o^!he 2f 4 1?4 in tho , hardcover *. t , W..4 «.Uv.;f*-l'~*y »ni.r th. K*; -.f I* 4. »?* 'OP'OOO tho'p.". ”2 ■PPllcKoe bJln, mJSIS tS7JplV22iirei^J^ Hl«ctl«n in tit* d«ni,n «( tiS pit". ^ I P«c«linr to'iucnJSoJJJt?proporty -«nd;«oMt ;«pj *rT»f •*•• ?K» rr> !»■* A •' *■ mu m- ' • wii'r..... Immediately surrounding **’ rr?t!??"u3u •PP“«*“on U •••2? j2-S2.?'ir' -rr"- vprimJM^ifra * :< ;• i>Ar'., •- *i ••-.'•• -.T.r 't-'-tl... ft ' n J P-o% .>. •v> :>wn£ ,*-< ♦. ■ t*i ■<'*•. /- ''•< V-' •. •,4^.;j .* ♦ .1 ►.f"^:v-»nr ^^•- • * v\ * '‘‘r ’- • *>. K -. 'x'S' - *«a » . . . -i. ‘ • .. . ^ / A ' .^V • ’ . >1 ' ^ - I. . \ -A, » . * . ^ ^ » • - - - ^ VtV.»- ’ V »-,f^*V' • • ‘,<•'' S’r. ^ i- ‘ ^ 4a.* * • -r* ; -*.rv:-,'*- cujror««u^ _____ _ •_ / ■ L » ' •'. r 4 . ' * V /•*- • • ••ir'r :.'.• •'. rrV,,.,- ... ■.-:- r-">%j*3' - . •'-» v.-T ' > V.- . • ;^:vV ’ .v' ^ , TIM frantinr of the propcooU vorianco vill not bo cootrary'te tho intontwof ^ho^oaprobonoivo Um'Plan or tho Sonlng Codo. K\ .-j It<'- ' *1J) Tho 9r«itl»9 of ouch varlaneo will not aotoly oorwo 00 • eonvoaioneo to tho opplieoot* bot io ooooooory ■<*: > . to ollovioto donenotrototf hordobipo or 4iffIciUtioo.^ ■ ii-' ■^V' ' .' NOW, THMiPoiii, ac XT RSfOLVn ^thot*^ City Couoeil of/tbo.V7 "City of 'Orono boroby opprovoo tho lokoohoro-'iootboob'^OM'^bov4oo«orSmeiil Ugl^V' oooiicotlon of Kont iwonoon to porait ^'tbo-4eoaotruetloii )Of;;o 'lokoolJo«''^ » iW* s«*rodOitiofi ao4 tho oMltional isipreooooiitO!^aotoi “‘ •‘^ ooro of tho foropoiiif findiafo and ottbioet<^i^tbo<sfolloifi09 • /*• ;-4m*. • f i 1) Tho non eoafomlng f.l* x li.l* 4oek loootod within tho 0*75* ootbaek area nay novor bo oneloood a of tho principal atrueturo but ia to ronoin no by Council in thia rooolotion a oeroonod dock with roof. > afV-Ifi^a-w. ' • ‘’.T'v'-U:• i:. * •, • .. \^jT |» ‘ U"- V‘ 2) Tho bttildinc pomit writton to oovor all propoood inprovananta auot includo tbo roaowal of tho d* a f roofod dock and tho ronowal of tbo bricked patio aroa within tho 0*7S* ootbock area* / « •.'•dte • w- ^3) Thia wariaiico application will expire on January 2S#" Iftl, if a boildino pomit for tho nropoood Inprooo* nonto on the property haa not boon ioauod,m Adopted by tho City Cojncil of tho City of Oroito, Ninnaaota . ^ at a rocular nootiny hold , 1M3* *,V»B K * 1. S' •: ■w * *•’. " >1^ -A': Uuuam 0. van NoatriwiyM m A^borta k. Strom, City (florK V \ \ V. .\ ‘A V\\ '\ \ \ »*^*# *!••• >. \A .«# ^v \ •t;- *' ;S;’ ‘ V' .'C '; I M. Nesset ><rchit«cture * . r 1 H n March 26, 1993 City of Orono Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Jeanne: Please find enclosed the zoning variance application materials as you requested. The unique situation indicated by the drawings is caused by the "pie shaped" configuration of the property. Hardcover requirements are difficult to meet because so much of the property is within the lake setback. The improvements indicated will decrease the net hardcover on the property with the loss of hardcover occurring on the lake side of the building. Thank you very much for your assistance and don't hesitate to call if you have questions. Enclosure i: ,v HARDCOVER CALCL'WTICN KORKSliEEl ' ''7" $2ie*CK 2CNE: (e;rc2£ CHE) 73-250' 250-5C0' 5C0-10C0' ExistI No HarocovcH in Zone ipl c. Diuveway _ X 0.. Sidewalk Patio/Deck F.lAHOiCAAE AAtAS UNOCALAIN »Y PLASTIC SHUT INC X X 0. Other • Hoiisp X S ^ ^ S.F. I?o£.C/^ 1 length • • WIDTH X ^ 1 \ S.F. X S.F. •X :S1 _ S.F. • X S.F. RAGE X S S.F. V,/.. •v. S.F. yC, & 2^ ^ Total Hardcover in Zone - Total Property A rea in Zone , S.F. S.F.■'V) S.F. S.F. 1 S.F. S.F* S.F. •1 S.F.• S.F. S.F.•• S.F. (jA^ S.F. • s B X 100 Z^_±% ff •■s Jt ‘ ••»■« -•mm NOTE: Areas computed by CAD system from graphically digitized drawing. Clark Engineering Corp. #93048 Checked $•2 I ^ i w t - w HARDCOVEH WLCUUTICN 'iiORKSl iEET . ‘ - jjTBACx 2CN6: (cixcte one) 0-75'^^^25^ 250-500' 500-1000' Existing HarocovcH in Zone ■»P) ~ ' firtuse X Of S.F. LENGTH • • WIDTH X • a *S.F. X .S.F. • • S.F. •• • p m S.F. a, GAHACf _X ____ _S.F. r. OHIYfVA^X ^ ,. Z-^Z S^ycjc S.F, X S.F. • • n. .^rnxwAi X . ‘5i4 s.f, incl X m S.F. X S.F. t. C atio/Dfcx• •X « 1^/S.F. • • • ■ .lAMtlCeA**X • S.F, AJIfAi UNPCJILAIN ftV X a 1 S • Ft PLASTIC SNIlTtNG X • • S.F. onie^z.X • m • • ^ , /^zrz U/au ^ , Sar# • a. Orurtt X . )g'/F.c .Sca ^ S.F. •<* • • Total H ardcover in Zone - ••- • •% Total Property Area in Zone -l.en B $.F. LflJ ».F. (TJ > in _____.-f m-----y ^nn • 4{o>Z> ^ % I '• «) r"H2 vi i 1 i. ■'J NOTE; Areas computed by CAD system from graphically digitized drawing Clark Engineering Corp. #93048 3-25-93 Checked f •.*. * . /* '* * 1 $ 1 % ^ 4 \ 4 i 1, . •» .* ;•• « % •1i' * S ^ 6 '■ 1 i i •%* 4 ¥ r •• ^ * i 0 i .» > . ' «• * ' • s~:, a ' •» • « ♦ • »1 • .. % . v-r:. ! ... ;. • ' -- J r-> - - --. > W"l-rv; • SriiV.; '-----------------------------7^-J p^'»;■ i’ Jiv'/f,. .. .. |,a' ,;.'rW'' " .1 ..▼I . »•%, > _«•. 9001^^219 11199 ui4/ JO!SidDX3 ’\^^l\s pjim dJnp»||M>JK|»ts»NW 1 ■X.' t • :v i ■S i j .>cr^i i TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members Ron Moorsc. Cirv Administrator UNOL METING FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator MAY 1 0 1993 CITY OF (MONO DATE:May 5. 1993 SUBJECT: #1818 Russell Lund Estate, 905 Tonkawa Road - Class III Preliminary Subdivision • Resolution Brief Reekw of Application and Planning Commission Recommendation The application involves tlw two lot division of the 6.3 acre Lund Estate. Each lot well exceeds the LR-1B area and lot width standards. The storage shed located at the proposed division line ^hall be removed. The developed lot has excessive hardcover within the 250-500* setback area within an 11.8% excess over the allowed 30%. There is 5.3% hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area consisting of a small deck, sandbox and 10’ + wide concrete and asphalt ramp. The Planning Commission discussed the issue as to whether additional area should be provided to offset the excessive hardcover in the 250-500’ setback area or require removals. Members also noted that if additional area is taken within the 250-500’ setback area to support existing hardcover this would encourage residential construction closer to the lake which would also necessitate an average lakeshore setback variance approval. The Planning Commission opted to allow the hardcover to remain with an 11.8% hardcover variance but asked that the asphalt ramp within the 0-75’ and 75-250’ setback areas be removed as a condition of the preliminary subdivision approval. In recent conversations with representatives of the estate, the applicants agreed to remove the asphalt ramp but voiced concern that there is still a need to provide access suirs down the embankment control erosion once the area is disturbed. Staff reinspected the lakeshore area and concurs that because of the existing topography there will be a great potential for erosion. In the early development of this properly, the lakeshore bank was altered to provide access to the shoreline. The excavated area now carries major surface water drainage from the upper elevations to the lake. Special care must be given to the i^esign of any structure being placed within the existing ramp area. Applicants have been advised to submit a plan addressing both an access structure and erosion control prior to final plat approval. Applicants shall also provide final hardcover facts for amended proposal. Other conditions of approval dealt with removal of the tower/antenna structures and on the property as original conditional use permit expires with the creation of new lot lines. Staff was to review the base of the tower located within the kennel strucuire. Staff recommends that six anchor bolts be removed to the level of the cement floor of kennel. / r Zoni« FUe #1S18 May 5. 1993 Page 2 Applicanis have agreed to file a separate vacation application for 20' sewer easement that encroaches within proposed Lot A. This will be ctnnpleted prior to final plat approval. Other conditions of approval arc set forth in the original staff memo prepared for Planning Commissioo’s review. The approval resolution contains all of the conditions adopted by the Pteming Committioo in their recommendation. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the fmdirys and conditions set forth at the Planniiv Commissioo approval which also includes granlifv a variance for excess hardcover within the 250-500' setback area. The exact levels of hardcover be detennined until staff has had the opportunity to review plans for an access structure to the lake. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS IH SUBDIVISION FOR THE RUSSELL LUND ESTATE - FILE NO. 1818 WHEREAS, Tres Lund and Dario Anselmo authorized represenutives of the Russell Lund Estote on March 26, 1993, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Vasa Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono’s Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planniiig Commission held a public hearing on April 19. 1993, at which time all persons desirii^ to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on May 10, 1993, the Oroiw City Council considered the subdivision application of the Russell T. Lund Estate, noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshorc Resklential Zoning District requiring a minimum of one acre of buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of 6.3 acres all of which is considered dry buildable. 3.The proposed plat contains two lots each exceeding the 1 acre minimum lot area requirements. Lot A proposed at 3.03 acres. Lot B proposed at 3.27 acres. Lot A is 305* measured in a straight line at the shoreline and 290 ’ at the 75 ’ setback area where 140 ’ lot width is required. 5. Lot B is 280 ’-*- measured in a straight line at the shoreline and 275 ’ at the 75 Page 1 of 4 • V • ■ ' p. % h- k ■> setback area where 140’ width is required Farh lot shall retain a separate Kcess at County Road 135 or Tonkawa Road. New access to serve Lot A must be approved by Hennepin County. Department of Transportation. 7.Proposed Lot B. the developed lot, has an excess of hardcover within the 0-75’ and 250-500’ setback area. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the excess hardcover within the proposed lot based on the foUowing H^ings: To require a lot line readjustment to include over a one-half acre of area within the 250-500’ setback area, would result in Lot A’s future residence being developed closer to the lake. B If proposed bouse on Lot A is to be constructed closer to the lake, th City would be encouraging a variance to the average lakeshore setback. The Lot B at 3.27 acre has a total of 16.6% hardcover. Hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area is at 4.68% where 25% b allowed. 5.73% hardcover exbts within the 0-75’ setback area. A mujof of the hardcover consists of a portion of a concrete and asfdialt ramp that was years ago with the development of the property. The ramp provides access to the lakeshore. A^licants have agreed to remove asphalt portion of the ramp and to reinstall with an Kcess structure that conforms to current shoreland standards. NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of tbc fmdings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the pfeliminary plat for the Russell Lund Esttte at 905 Tonkawa Road per the survey dated June 12, 1992, revised March 25. 1993, by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the foUowing conditions: I.Prior to final approval applicaitts shall file a vacation application for the 20 sewer easement that encroaches within Lot A. Page 2 of 4 l: .* *•• • .k' ■■ • - The following structures shall be removed prior to final plat approval A B. Shed on proposed shared lot line Antenna towers and base to be removed. Antenna base located within kennel shall be allowed to remain as long as anchor bolts are remov'^d to level of existing paved kennel floor. 3.Satellite dishes and other items stored on urai^veloped lot to be removed prior to final plat approval. Prior to final plat approval applicants shall provide a plan for access structure to lakeshore. Said structure shall replace existing asphalt ramp within 0-75’ and 75- 250’ setback area. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on tte second and fourth Mondays of the month: Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200’. Drawing to .elude: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated June 12, 1992. revised March 25. 1993. B Dedication of "drainage and utility ea.sements" 10’ wide along all perimeter property lines and 5’ each side of internal property hnes. C. Naming of plat. 2. Legal documents required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with properr/ interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. Page 3 of 4 B The iqjplicants must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. 3, Fees to be paid: Total due: $375.00* A. Final |^t fee » $175.00 B. Legal review and filing fee » $200.00 *The two lot subdivisKMi shall be referred to the City Assessor for the determination of the fair market value so that a park (Mication fee can be determined. Applicants will be advised as soon as the fee has been determined. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesou at a regular meeting held this 10th day of May. 1993. ATTEST Dorothy M. HaUin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrumeitt was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Ir. &. Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said insmimem was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 c TO:Mavor Callahan and Orono Council Membersm Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:April 13. 1993 SUBJECT: #1818 Russell Lund Estate, 905 Tonkawa Road - Class III Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Pintinent Ordinances Section 11.03, Definition 66(C) 2/3 - Subdivision classified as a Class III Subdivision Section 10.24, Subdivision 5(B) - Lot standards Required lot area » l acre Lot A = 3.03 acres Lot B *= 3.27 acres Section 10.02, Definition 43(B) At lakeshore Required = 140’ Lot A = 305’ Lot B = 280 ’ - Lot width for lakeshore lots At 75’ setback Lot A = 495’ Lot B = 275 ’ Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover inventory for proposed Lot B 0-75 setback area = 20,600 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing hardcover = 1,180 s.f. or 5.73% 75-250 ’ setback area = 48,200 s.f. Allowed = 12,050 s.f. or 25% Existing hardcover = 2,258 s.f. or 4.68% 250-500 ’ setback area = 65,400 s.f. Allowed = 19,620 s.f. or 30% Existing hardcover = 27,351 s.f. or 41.82% Existing variance = 7,731 s.f. or 11.8% JLti ‘; ’ V ■V A k Zoning Memo #1818 April 13, 1993 Page 2 500-1,000' setback area = 8,200 s.f. Allowed » 2,870 s.f. or 35% Existing hardcover 720 s.f. or 8.76% Total lot area = 142,400 s.f. Total existing hardcover = 23,778 s.f. or 16.6% Lbt oC Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - 1-4 Hardcover Inventory E - Shawn Gustafson Report dated 4/6/93 F • Sewer As-built G - Preliminary Plan Review of SubdlvWoti Applicant proposes a 2-lot division of the 6.3 acre property. As recorded in the factual fmdings above, each lot meets the area and width requirements. The storage shed located at the proposed division line shall be removed. Upon a site inspection, staff noted two partiaUy dissembled towers. The proper / was originally approved for a use permit for independeitt antenna towers. The antetmas no longer meet the required setbacks with the redefining of lot lines. The structures should be completely removed prior to flnal plat approval. Hardcover within the 250-500’ setback area shows an excess of 11.8% hardcover improvements. The majority of the hardcover results from the blacktop drive/parking area ^ tennis court. Within the 0-75’ setback area there is approximately 5.73% hardcover consisting of a srrull deck, 10’ wide concrete ramp and sandbox supported by a retaining wall. Review Exhibit E. The City Engineer ’s report calls attention to a sanitary sewer easemettt at a 20’ width that exists within proposed A. Staff has contacted the surveyor to when the easement was created and he assumed at the time of the original Vasa Park Plat in 1968. The current easement serves no public purpose. Review as-built on Exhibit F. Lot B is served from a service Y at the southwest corner of the property and Lot A shall be served by a service Y within Tonkawa Road. The City Engineer recommends vacating the sewer easement prior to the final plat approval. 1 f r,-' r I'1^fe: lll^ Zoning Memo #1818 April 13. 1993 Page 3 Issues for Consideration Hardcover within the 250-500’ setback area has an excess of 11.8%. Total hardcover on the 3.27 acre parcel is at 16.6%. Will Planning Commission recommend approval of the hardcover as proposed? W’hat other options of action are available: Lot line to be adjusted to compensate for existing hardcover. An additional 25.770 s.f. of area would have to be added to specific setback area to offset existing hardcover; or Require removal of 11.8% hardcover improvements - partial or total?? 2.5.73% hardcover exists within the 0-75’ setback area. Are there unusual physical conditions on site that would allow improvements to remain, i.e. topography, number of years improvements have existed on property . . .? Staff Recommendatioa To approve the two lot subdivision application finding all lot standards ot the LR-IB Zoning District have been satisfied and that there is adequate sewer capacity to serve one additional unit within sewer district. Approval is based upon the following conditions: 1.Prior to final plat approval applicant shall file a vacation applicaiien for the 20’ sewer easement in Lot A. Applicant shall obtain a permit from Hennepin County Department of Transportation for new curb cut/access to Lot A. 3. 4. Shed on lot line to be removed prior to final plat approval. Original conditional use permit approved for antenna structures is no longer in effect as prior setbacks from newly proposed lot lines cannot be maintained. Partial towers aiKl concrete base to be removed prior to final approval. 5.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10’ width adjacent to sucet. 10’ along all perimeter lot lines and 5’ on either side of the shared lot line. 6.Upon application for building permit, future owner of Lot A shall make payment for a sewer unit charge in the amount of $7,260.00 (based on 1993 fee schedule). iSm Zoning Memo #1818 April 13. 1993 Page 4 8. At the time of Council ’s approval of the preliminary plat, the two lot plat shall be referred to the City Assessor for the determination of the fair market value so that a park dedication fee can be determined. Plaiming Commission recommendation concerning excess hardcover within 0-75’ and 250-500 ’ setback areas. If hardcover improvements are to be removed, establish a reasonable removal date or if hardcover is to remain with proposed lot layout, please note required hardships. Applicant may also be asked to respond to the hardship issue. ' . 'is- • l^-t'lLvi.m1-l7. p ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 5* y •erty location *ite Address '^a f'At*'A it A •r - - Property Identification Nunber (P.I.D.) ^ ^ ^ Z '^1' ^ ’‘j ^— Please check one - Property _ _ _ abstract or - - - torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) /Tyv y ffl ^ f Phone (work) Address • 9z> f _ _ _ _ City: Zip:__£££££. OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Phone (work) Y''?‘f 9ZName ?-*• t— — Address: 9^7 , City:- - -Zip:_JZli£ (attach list it more than onej EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels / Development Size ^ 1 o Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total# all parcels Present Use (check)Residential? no. of units-T-rj. rJ - Other (specify) —- ^ M. u a I* r r "M 4 : Mffffiar Present Zoning District LA-‘/S_ PROPOSAL tTtTntTuk^ or r awi^ a w vw 01 C£S 300. OC CHECK Ti 300. OC '"’TiTuiyi H26SS10 CCOl ROi T12: 03/26/Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Division for Tax Purposes ^_ _ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites;/ / Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density; Minimum Lot Size; Units per <^. .7 Acres J^Z'/Z a Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use; (check)X Residential Other (specify) ^1:■ V Ml M.airtfcswtati. nTn Dffit*,■ ^ - ^ I*'laia.llLrt'i ll MmiOTM MMEWAL MBCEES^Y FOR COMPLOT PRBtWlWJ»Y APPIICATIOS 1. Coxnpleted Application Fonn 2. Preliminary’Plat information on Certificate of Survey this^list frorneLepin^Coi’ity Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 4 Ai®an^lVd*endum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is Date ________conplete. Zoning Official's Signature 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. C.rtification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II 4 III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $200.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class I 4 II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III 6 all non-residential) 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 ThWppiicant hereby agrees .to provide reauested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, CitY Planning Cos^ission and Council necessary to dlMnc'e ^ further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Lf^ate .7 - Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City5Knning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on t„ third Monday of each month. Applicants must be isreview meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. 1* an applicant unable to attend a scheduled meeting, “'5Je^|”llding s*^ zoningauthorized agent attend in your place and to advls Office of this change prior to the meeting. F^^e ir.a' I • eTk • A ■ ONNii MMI TAXI»AVtK\/i TAKPAVCR NANE/APM TAXAAYia NMV/MM M fS>il7-ZS S4 MIS Mtrs rMTCIMOOO u J • NCfUMNIV/J • HCfUIMEY JACK • A JUDY • ICILNANKY •7S AAKTCNMOOe U UMe LAM m SSSSASA M-117-2S XI MO oooAS roMUMA n AfOl A AOtLSNUN HRS AMI A AOCtSNfIN OXS TOMUMM M UMB UKf HN BSSM SO M-117-XS XI Mlt M«XS RARTCMKJOO RO J A H SA7AR JACK A HARY SA*AR YX5 RARTfMKXW ROAD iONB LARI HN SSSSO SO M-117-XS XI MIS I MOSS TONKAMA ~~ OMKR NAHI MILLIAH J HCLILIAN ITAL TAWAYKR NIUIAN J HCLILLAN mm/um n% tomuma roao lONB LARK Ml 55SM I MOO AOOR OMCR NAHI TAHOAYCR nahi /aoor TOTAL BATCH Ml OMIX « V. lOOCOIN COUNTY OODOIRTY INMIMATtON SYSTIH OROOCRTY OMKRS LISTSO M-117-XS IX MOM OARTIIOOM M A NAOY KNBILSra :i A HARY INBILSHA MO OARTIMOM M L0N6 LARK m SSSS*SO 00>I17-XS XI OMS 00007 TOMUMA M SAC COLLINS 111 CfORCK/CNARLOTTt COLLINS IIX 007 TOMCANA M LONB LARK Ml SSSSO SO M-117-XS XI Mil OMSO AOORfSS UNASSIBNiO J N SA7AR A H SATAR JACK SA7AR OXS RARTKNNDOO RO LONB LARK Ml SSSSO SO M-1I7-XS XI MIO MOSS TONKAMA M J A H OXLOKRT JAHIS N A HARY H 61LKRT OSS TONKAMA RO LONG LAKE Ml SSSSO RIMRI NO. OIOSSOOl :!E ••V •00>ll7oXS K1 OMlOOMlJ K A L 0 JOHN 1 A LOUROKS 0MILHKTTI XL 00001SO M-1I7-XS XI 0M7 MOSO MRTIMRRRI M NALANi C A JO KLU L RUM nalano a jo KLLKN NURR OSO OARTKMRRM ROAO LONB LARK Ml SSSM SO 00>il7-ts XI Mlt RUSSKLL T LUNO JR KTAL RUSSKLL T LUNO JR TOSO NIST LARI ST HRLS Ml SO 00-117-tS XI M17 MOOO RARTKMQM M OARY N A JKAMC N RRXM«L CARY N A JKANNK N RRXM«L 000 RARTKMOM M LOA LARK HN SSSSO '•* t ♦4 »• it ‘• #• * *MfV f \* %■/IV /> •A, ♦ 4 ‘I-I*IA♦v,4 t •V „ V.' ■{■ : % 'i Atm Mi OA *MMi iM Mi M tm «nu mm ummat 41I1M mm wmrmoM >m joJO'jMSaVMM AJNnOO NI4SM1M HU JO II Sf N0U4MM0JM1 JO M0UViNlS3M» ■lilOSlMn C19VJ INA AVNi AJUHIO I i I ■i ■ 11^ . •* , H f? t » .' •* Ji .V t., t' ,rr' ®bbbbp**^ * *\ I >.• -i \ '•■ ‘iV •" ■■ v'« ■ t ' \ i -.V' '.?-*u “** /.i '1' •/;vV."?v ■•f ^ Jr. nf . i; , r > A 1 /w' ^ ' fr i r ‘ *^V ’ » ill ^ ., r «; V: /■ h ' . . i i’S' »'<r- :-.. i,1!V • ■-V • • • • .'v . ” » . t* ' V‘ /:#«.’• ‘1- V,- ,f wC *u .Vi// , ~ ys- ■ ■-*• • ,, ;•*» , «' • 4^ • / k*» V ^ * s • > ••iM' • ■■' ,4s- ;..- l-.Vi.l . - '.-' . I’-.v^. ,.?,« .'! V ^ ^ - V f : V*.''‘ >\. '. < •< I '•■ :• * '^v'- •*''iV* T; ■•.' . ’ •■ • ■19V4 *0N llMia . r iSIl SUBM AlMBdCMd MUSAS MOUYMMiNI AlMidOlkl AINOOD NldlNNiN too Mom ^ » S4/%2/f0 llfO NTUI 4 , rf H. I L frr/ re“hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone • % A. House ' x 250-500' 50Q-1C00' - S.F. f-zr/S — —^ • LENGTH WIDTH • X S.F. X • • S.F. m •• X e • S.F. • • X s m • •• • S.F. B. Garage x • • S.F. • « • *t-* • c. D riveway x • m S.F. X m • S.F.tT\L' i• * S • ••- D. Sidewalk . x • S.F. f-------- «• S •T X 7s . e7s • S.F. ' .... • X •• S.F. •• \ E. >TIO/% * • • •• ' •D eck - X ____________-SiFt• ••?>•*;* .. ...1 ?• E. Landscape ’ x •m S.F. AREAS •• • UNOERUMH lY . X • -.S.F. • PLASTIC-------------- •• ^ • • ♦ • SHEETING X ■■, S.F. • •• X • ■1 . S.F. • • e. Other X S.F. • • « • Total Hardcover in Zone //^o , S • F •A Total Paopcrty A rea in Zone 6oa S.F.LlI • m //Bo ' *4*r^. X 100 -73 % ••• • t • • • •• • •• •• ••• ic.... r^_ HJi,RDCOV£R CALCULATION HORXSHEET SST3ACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (^5-250^ 250-5G0' Existing Hardcover in Zone ^ /j 5C0-1000' T otal Hardcover in Zone Total PRoi»eATY A rea ih Zone A. • H ouse % • X •5-0 • •LENGTH WIDTH • X 5,• X r; m •• X # •• • X • . . E. « Garage .. • X • • C. • * /F# #*f/t D riveway • tr» /40 X 89 /ICO X 0.. • Sidewalk • - Z X - X 7 C • • _ • ^4M/>X • • • • X • • E.’at 10/ D eck ^ • •• • • X • * •• • • F. Landscape • • • X • AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ■ ,X . • m • /So PLASTIC------ SHEETING • M • • m • • •• X • • • • X . 5-24 • G. Other • X •53 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. QO S.F. S.F.T-'-l S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 5. P. S.F. S.F. T\ ' '^\T\ _ X 100 - zzs'r S.F. ^9,200 4.^8 B % »• •««* » • w •••• • •••■ *•- * • • frrsrf HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 75-250* (2SQ-SQQ!J 500-1000* Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH WIDTH s.F. S.F. S.F. - X B. Garage • • #r* c. Driveway ^t>yf €* D.. Sidewalk ‘ C9tyr ru^ Zre4»j • E. Patio/ Deck • •• F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY , . PLASTIC-• SHEETING SAif 1.3 C*/4li.S G. Other X X X X J.3 V % Total Hardcover in Zone s.F. S.F. ^700 S70 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. /-gP S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S • P • 2. 7-y/ s.F. Total Pfourtt A«*a IK ZoHl - . -----«.F. Lfi 0 27./y/ ^=-[i] X “0 - ---% \ ■ Tfff ys^iso' /A^ r//r OzIs:.^ZjU£l4^jLaZB, rA^TZ-y^f 7^U — r/^/r 20*^€. I V ■‘J- • ■ ••. . W^f ^ c*A^O f^rd rf HARDCOVER CALCULATION HORKSHEH SETBACK zone: (circle one) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' (jOO-1000^ Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH TT'^A-// CC't^tT » B. Garage _ _ • • • c. Driveway 20 D. S1OEWALK E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC-" sheeting G. Other X X X « • *• X X X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone WIDTH • •• m • «• * « • m •Zo • m JS m 700 m •m • • m ‘• • •• • •«■ m • • m • • Zone -72 0 N Zone ^2 oo 71 y lOQ - ' JlJ---------------- ,0m ‘ ■ • • • mm *•*••• 0m^ fW s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F* S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 1_ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. V p. ^ - - -ir » - • i1 A li % »• • • • I/ll Bonestroo RDsene «|rv Ancfcriilc & |\]| Associates Engineers A ArcMtects V^r. C' 9'.. 'esTTK. ''f »»■£>-.••• -jt rr* <? “wr ' i j ^ .f- 19 v:>* ^£- ’»- ^ % ■’v^’ Li V'^w-’'-. '"t V ► r ^ * * '■-<K^ *'' - A Cr* ' JCK- »£ t t>*,,.«».n^ i*»r 9 ' .irr- A ‘ ‘’t ■ JW:^1 O . -7= » •' ? L 9.,y»f* * ?*--••> * ^7«.rf'}:'»' 4 --iy*'- .1'' V't; 1 ^ ^'i.: ff A'KTT'V?*' ♦ ^ Cr'*Aiy* ; 8u*ga'^ **? rfs &i<^‘‘ V »t P' ^ P.'r V,*^' V* • V P '‘- •' -‘ A V* « •* rW* - , ♦— ** r « V*.»J'’ : •'f yr-, D *^1 p ArtJT'VV' et e Ar’‘^ \‘4-l * Se-C Ga V A \^-'^ e-" ^'£ iT -p t ^ofTC- •k a'' **! ^'*C J C,-t:>v\-f^L \’a * w"' Aa‘i V'^-- 0 ;. 9^ >av«** t* **f va-*' 'A G..-. r 1- -f'^'-t; •€ t - ■:,''T (•'■•• t*'' Pf »e *»' • *>i »:> CVXy^oa* i 0pnon P£ C Ch^itJhor' L P: ’“•’ O'-vP* C'^a'^p^ • t' •'■c'^ _p-r M pjwve skv •-a^ap V SOP ;a'"p’<- ^ F*'k^'»'an?r April 6, 1993 Ms. Jeann* A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 :apr j Re: Russell Lund Estate File No. 139-1818 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed property division for theEltatriS L^ts 1, 2, 6 3;Block l“ Vasa Park subdivision located on the vest side of County Road No. 135 (Tonkawa Road) in Section ®* division is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. ?ss::!:*So;ri2d‘i f«?'2iie^L^”%!;i"So?ih2ii5‘’;n5‘^ Sewer service to Lot A should be provided by connecting to ®"service wye on the west side on Tonkawa Road, located approximately 100 ?;j? .SuSSrlJ of the north property line thereof, fewer eervioe to Lot B is provided by a service wye located southwesterly of the most southwesterly corner of The location^of both wye locations are shown on Record Plan AlOl. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 233S West Hkihwav 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 .rtWw., ' > 6 . . t %• P' , * ( ^ . .1 ,.•. - .» • if - - 4 •.«..• ‘ f *• A'-*".- • *■ E ■ t p At ,^,r'\\ f' , k 9 9f *. PV -. * >. , . A V ' f •' - F 9 » V'-^- r PF •D; A. \ *"♦ •.* .- r* ‘ ‘ •>' ■'4,*’ ■ *'F 4. h-F - , : • ’ ' ; • ■ • t •- »-'F • /■ •* 9 . ,, . •*: s*F ^ pf '.’* F' - »A ‘ f «. *- r v'T '. oc;a the Russell T. Lund ision located on the Section 8. The nt. Drainage and long the right-of- therly and southerly tary sewer easement ted. :ting to an existing :ed approximately 100 Sewer service to nately 140 feet the existing house. ::ord Plan AlOl. aestions. WMI m/>& * '/ sV «• I «v /, «i V, m N - k i li« r^.to /:*:iv» • m ^. ‘V .. i 5^ '•' i k > • * i. f. \'U\ ■»' A XI o r\'*i.S*‘.V' >>k m'i >r 12. *V rygxff /: k Vk 4' — t ••'•iJC' F •*M '.'k • •' t ii4' . r.“ i r/'A'ru: 7 /•nv' ‘•••^> ' >.■ Mim « '*7V k • JFf 1 0 Vi ‘v^irio^MSi'^ -k ■ < ; <,f. s^’Wi t '•I F?p «• I '•Vmi . * , ir- .^*'1I i V/ir*(r^ ' ■ -!:;■ :,„i: ;■ ^'.i>^ *. ■’.••' . * 'V ' 4 ‘ ' I 'V 4 * j . ^ ‘ > 'V » • I ^ ^ \ ' *! / w * ‘ ; * *•.'» • ■ I . ■ ‘ ^ II- ; .<> •"ii? ■! ’ « \i /’’'■*. -«'»l IP ,'v{»*’ . ♦“ /-O •• -k K ^ > • ' w:;k'^• * ..-f’ t V • «i * 'ill V*■IP* r ‘»^ f »Jla■r' T'WiKgiJlj '* ,11^. a -•|f .-x7iv - r^' yT*'. ^ ’^1 r V ■ ,« m ^.. y.Jmi W: : ^ ! k ; - ■>.: ('..•- •»' V V*‘ W'mm '. ,'•- •:-;<>i . V' ■ ■ a'f '•'>k uj no lAo , ’ rf o rrr* « _1 Ik ;;Wt 3: • f *' '|ii; »■ u .■> rVi '•j%. * H i <7 • • % 0 :i o 'h »' * i a . * ^ nd*'f K>‘i I W -UY >. 'f, '•r-Him^- ’m^Eiiti <.«t'. y.^y < •Z^.-V ^ ♦ • . I » !'■ * '^»i * ■• . '"•r: '.t. i ' * ’ V t ‘ ' ••U' Ifri' .'.^i'4£f ,i ~.__ . ww ' ■i''yMi, ( •* '■■■ •' v& l’::ii>r ^'r l>PM PROPOSED PROPERTY DIVISION FOR THE RUSSELL T. LUND ESTATE IN LOTS 1. 2. & 3 BL jOCK 1. VASA PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA r,n Existing t^qal Description Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 1, Vasa Park. PropQgtfd Legal Descriptions “t 5 tE < ■• .iapo.~t on th. .ot».y lino ot ..Id l«t I, .11 l« dlooX 1, Vasa P«. ^ B Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying southeasterly of • U"* Mansions draw^frosi the siidpolnt of the northeasterly lot 2 to the midpoint of the survey line of said Lot 2. all in Blocs 1, Vasa Park. o I Iron lAacker Bearings shown are to an assumed datum. • ^ 4 .VICNEOtY REV&ION DATl ___/Ti____s . • .. . i»i!i<.xirnoN I hi*U‘bv iTflilx lli.ll lh^^ xurn’x ivjx pri‘p.m‘J \*% rm* \h urnlrr mv difttl ^upt*r- bCAl I- TW.r To;Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Stephen Weekman. On-Site Systems Manager May 3, 1993 COUNOLMEElWe may 1 0 1993 OIY Of ORONO #1819 Chuck Rusch, 1920 Shoreline Drive Variance Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B) - Lot minimum requirements Description of Request This is a renewal of the variance originally granted by the City in 1989 for a long and narrow lakeshore lot on County Road 15. The conditions of the City CouncU approval included budding envelope specifications and no variance to the required budding setbacks and haricover requirements. The lot was approved for access to County Road 15 via a sq»rate driveway. Due to the unusual shape of the property, staff has included the approx^te amoum of hardcover that wdl be allowed within each of the setback zones as a finding within the variance resolution. Please review the enclosed Planning Commission packet for futher informatton. iliilulkxl ion R Mill -ndationPlanning C The planning Commission approved the application as submitted with a vote of 5 For, 0 Against. i •.4 -7 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE NO. 1819 WHEREAS, Chuck Rusch (hereinaRer "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1920 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Per Exhibit A. attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for renewal of a variance granted in 1989 per Resolution No. 2630 and previously rettewed in 1990 per Resolution No. 2829 and renewed again in 1991 per Resolution No. 2979 to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on a lot of defined width 30* where a defuied lot width of 200* is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE FT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1819. The property is located in the LR-1A Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3.The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed Application #1410 on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A.The lot area exceeds the minimum two acre dry buildable area requirement. B A feasible building envelope exists in addition to primary and alternate drainfield sites, which have been tested and approved for use. Page 1 of 5 r } 'V' , W '.' : ^’•. ■- * “itrl'.fA 1^"'' V W- li €m m^inm:}Wife. 'Lv. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. C.The haidship to the property lies in its extreme narrowness at the point where the defined lot width is measured. Furthermore, there is no adjacent land available for purchase that would increase the defined lot width to the 200 ’ width minimum standard. The Hennepin County Department of Public Works has verified that the County will approve private driveway access onto County Road 15. Although the property contains a feasible building site, that site is limited by narrowness of the lot and by the designated drainfield sites, hence careful site planning will be required in developing the property. Therefore, it is.appropriate that a diagram of the building envelope, including drainfield sites as well as hardcover limitations within each of the setback zones, be filed with this resolution to make fiimre potential buyers of the property aware, of the site limitations. The City CouiKil originally granted this variaiKe in 1989 per Resolution No. 2630 and finds no changes from the original findings and conditions of that resolution. A request for renewal was granted per Resolution No. 2829 in 1990 and Resolution No. 2979 in 1991. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the appiicaat and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property ^ peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a ^bstan^ property right of the ai^licant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 i i J •,rj 1 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a renewal variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to pennit the construction of a single family residence on this lot of defined width 30 ’ where 200 ’ defined lot width is normally required for the construction of a single family residence, subject to the following conditioiis: 1. 2. Any proposed residence must meet the required minimum setbacks established for the LR-IA zoning district, and must further meet the required setbacks from drainfield lines. A rfiagram of the building envelope with approved drainfield sites and a list of allowable hardcover within each of the setback zones shall be attached to this resolution as Exhibits B and C, to advise future potential buyers of the properQr of the building site limitation. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 Any (voposed residence or development of the property shall meet the hardcover requirennents of the LR-IA zoning district. No other zoning variances for development of this property will be granted. The approved access for the property b a single driveway at County Road 15. The standard park fee shall be collected by the City at the time a building pennit b issued. Authorities granted by thb resolution run with the property not with the applic^, but are peniibsive only and must be exercised by application for a buildi^ permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or thb variance will expire on that date (May 10, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of thb variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 k 9.The undersigned a{>plicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the propert)’. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesoto at a tegular meeting held on the lOtb day of May, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of ^y. 1993 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesott municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 f I i J V-VIr IIIr EXHIBIT A RBSOWriOM NO \u>-r j' * UeBcriptioiii Tcocta A oitd D, Uegiotared Loud Purvey Ho. 9G, Flleo oC Regiatror oC Titles. Cottntv oE Hentienln ' * Olid that port of Lot Six (6) lying Soutltweotcirly oC o line dreen ocroso said lot Dsrdllel to * Olid 105 £eet Uoctheaotocly Crow ULe SoutliMeotorly lino oC seid lot. Auditor's Subdivision Huwber 356, Iteiuiepin County, Hinneooto, nccording to tlio mop or plot tlisreoC on. file and of record in tho OECice oC the Roglotror oC Titles oC Hennepin County, Hinnosoto. Togetlior uith tut eonsimitit Cor rood purposes over tlie Heotecly 7.0 Coot o£ Lot 5, Auditor's' Bubdivision lluslier 356. Iloiuiopiii County, Minnesota. ' • • ; t i-h • - ‘-‘5 . • fy '. P«llutAA>f l>£MMF/ril:> Sire ^Hevvut^ Jiff g ; At-T^AMOTV t>AAiNF/(-i-t> SI tr (i«o*<Aifc,N ScAue /"•/o6- , P«K>^ SWM0V RY CA«M«cite /)Mt» Atjoci/iil's • • " f-s ** l^e^otunoA) A?o. A .|/y t • SNx^' op BuiLbAAcg- ^AJVrLofP' ANb ]>iTAiA;rieLi> ^i-nss *1 k m Vi i > •• ,^ ^ V-, . I vr-‘*i;. It) To:Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager Date:April 9, 1993 Subject:<1^1819 Chuck Rusch, 1920 Shoreline Drive Variance - Public Hearing 7^ing District: LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential, 2 acre minimum Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B) - Lot minimum requirements - Lot width. List of Exhibits A - B • C - D - E - F - G - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Resolution No. 2650 Resolution No. 2829 Resolution No. 2979 scription of Request This is a renewal of the variance originally granted by the City in 1989 for a long and narrow lakeshore lot on Shoreline Drive. The conditions of the City CouncU approval i^luded building envelope specifications, no variance to required LR-IA setbacks, and no variance to hardcover requirements. The lot was approved for access to County Road 15 via a separate driveway. Due to the unusual shape of this property, staff will include the approximate amoum of hardcover that will be allowed within each of the setback zones. The allowable hardcover is as follows: 0-75’ = 0 75-250’ * 1,850 s.f. 250-500’ = 8.040 s.f. 500-1,000’ = 18,375 s.f. •- ^ -«*r. V*.- , I MiiiTfimill iittiS r till r f * 1 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each addit^ppal—^riance) Renewal Variance Fee^- (no ch2in5^ f jrorn oir —^—/ Variance for non conforming use $200.00»- After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) V * '?1 5\ f\ OFFICE i V".V“rVi.w'^A a V wvv f-Lcrk* k.*f r I f rc\i Tt 1/*A r* vv • 100 '■ V r• V PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address l*7^(b • RECUFT-inm m ^26S5J0 CCOl f<01 T15 03/3C Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _^(month/year) I (do)(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: _ _residential _ _ _other (specify) Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Name (2uSCN Phone (hOTie ) 03^S“S/OS Phone (wor)c) 93(^' 1731 Address: &ox /S^Citvz/)z/) Zip: SS'-^(o<D OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:Cltvt Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Describe reouest in detail: rnn«i-T*uction Cost $ _ _ _ —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - iFi ■’"‘ir ■‘*1 ! VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore ■ '-i other (specify) A m y'- 1." !!- HARD8HIP/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Viii?rAA/d.£ P-SaiEujAL------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ‘ -I.i. _r>A.J-AlJ ^ • i (attach additional sheets if necessary) RBQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered capg>lcte: 1. 2. Completed Application Form ""certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3, _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4, Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8>j"xll'' for reproduction). 5, _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8Jj"xll*). 6, _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll ’'). 7, ___^As an addendum to this applicationr please attach a separate list of 8. any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the abowm iafoxmatlan hae not been included. APPLICAIIT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Date S-26>-73 lll■llllll sieaMim The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further AOthorlies reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commissicn members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner*s Signature _Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled 2mwiew meetings of the Planning Comaission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building * Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. fk -A. * d i % - A •1 ir! ^ 1 tjT <lJ DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights data", we would like to inform you that your request for a license from the City of Orono or any of its you to furnish certain private or confidential information. 't /'<,i -AvV y iVf --rir^* *!** ■>'• }'■ . f •-ye V V-. & '.S' •You are notified that: 1, The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license 3. The information may be shared with other H federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit o license. 4. If your requested permit or license acquires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. YOU have certain tights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. your full name is required to process this application or permit. JSS Address fi2o/s/r/SVf^C /W City ((^/)) Pnone State ZTp 1 understand my rights as stated above. Signature ■rM^lllHlli 'lifitiT alts ----- Property Owenrs List for Application #1648 10-117-23 42 0006 James Wright 1980 Heritage Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 42 0019 W. Gregory Coward 1950 Heritage Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 42 0005 Robert & Patricia Stierna 1930 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 42 0007 Alan & Anne Nettles 1940 Shoreline Drive Wayzata^ MN 55391 10-117-23 42 0018 Morris & Jackie Nelson 1900 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 r* mKt. TO'• >v X r-:'.nr«\■??:--..*5 t-.>«<i>ii?ui "MMMeaBacaagj;^^f fc* •J //V ,.BAY<i'~^' . 7' ,M ^Z^ll ii^ ir4 -2sl=r~^- pf*« I 2^r>) i' , »• - *'“*!» * —;//y <]icr # r ^ Se’itve ^^ ^•stce •A_. V. » j»- . ••Cl— 4p 4 M A • *"7 •-• • .9? \" V V>C.-vs . \. v"»' J ’/•‘t /* _« O'w;X iS' Ti \ \ L V^f L t *’• ^ *-8? * ^D KVitNV AO® N V is \ V V* w i'W // / f® '/♦ v« V J ‘J > ■'%*:= ir /•‘6«r;y/?/.• • </* Mb ?• tdob^ I' / t<. N > r.> 400. r«'' MdO (lii 'V-?i<i VJ #14 ''.r ^ k-A:#<W S V70 •-• ' / Orono S&SSSXS^lSRi Tracks A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 06, PIlea of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, and that part of Lot Six (6) lying Southwesterly rtf a line drawn across said lot parallel to and 105 feet Northeasterly from the Southwesterly line of said lot. Auditor's Subdivision Nuwher 3S6, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the wap or plot thereof on file and of •ki: fyf; :►/ i- r rI CITY IJORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2650________ A RBSOLOnOH 6RAHTIH6 A VARIAMCB TO IfONICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23r SUBDIVISION 6(B) FILE 11410 Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter City ) and legally described as follows: Per Exhibit "A" attached (hereinafter "the property")? and WBEREASr the applicants have applied to the City * variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivi^on 6(B) to permit the construction of a •infl* ? o £ 200* ^isOf defined width 30' where a defined lot width of 200 is normally required. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1410 2. The property is located in the LR~1A Single Family Laiceshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: a) The lot area exceeds the minimum 2.0 dry buildable acre requirement. b) A feasible building envelope pj^ianary and alternate drainfield sites which have tbsted and approvei for use. Page 1 of 5 4 ! V CITY OF ORQNO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^650________ ■ st" lot width to the 200* minimum standard. 4. The Hennepin County Department of ® verified that the County will approve a private driveway access onto County Road 15. 5. Although the property contains a that site is limited by narrowness of ^J®, ill* designated drainfield sites, hence careful s^e planning will be required in developing the property. Therefore, it is appropriate that a diagram of the drainfield sites be filed with this resolution to make future potential buyers of the property aware of the site limitations. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommerdatlona of the Commission, reports by City staff, comments by ‘he applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The Citv Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply to other property in this zoning district; that 'the vtriance voSld not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve *• ® SInvenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is preserve a substantial property right of the would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLOSIOHS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code ' Subdivision 6(B) to permit the ® ?^?nn footresidence on this lot of defined width 30* where a 200 foot defined lot width is normally required for single family residence, subject to the following conditions. Page 2 of 5 t.- ’ I?I-‘ 14 V CITY OF QRONO City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2650 ________ l'. Any proposed i:^?S«“a.Ut*th “«qui«a setbaoks fro» drainfield sites. - ____j ^ r>^ rurT^ntsi ---- - - 2. A diagram of ^ttrihe^d*'to^ resolution as tV a%^^^^ futo"'p*otential buyers of the p^o^rty of 'the building site U.nit.trons.propci^'j wAk w-w------ ^ district. 4 Ko other toning variances for development of this property will be granted.propeiiiy *»*** — !.- r 5. Vhe approved access for the property is a sing driveway at County Road 15. fee shall be collected by the City at ‘ie ri:.‘“"buridirg1e^:it is issued. 7. Authorities granted by^^thxs^ varian^^^^^^^ property not with i _-Vion for a building permitSust be^ exercised ^y applicationj^or ^his varxancc w-i.** —---- 8 Violation of or constitute*a*v^^ ^ndiiions ®* ‘•'I* A\'«”^tica\lS •"/ authority g5;n?efS«rin!'and*iSall be punishable a. a misdemeanor. V _____m Ategr^aodgrantee neie*i*r -------- 4. a «nd “■E7S.vii '■ Page 3 of 5 a 4 J V cirv ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2650________ 1^; Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of June# 1989. 'ATE OF HIKNESOTA) )S8. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of June# 1989# by James R. Grabek and Dorothy M. Hallin# Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono# a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. •. * ___ » ^ My CommiWrcn “ Jt?W h ’ V . M I Page 4 of 5 «•• # \ CITY OF QRONQ3 City of OROrVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2650________ STATE"OF IIlimp^^T^ bR 5^COUNTY OF namiBiiiw ^+u a.„ of _____________1**.3 o«" »e ^ Not«y Pub-nc within and for sAc coun^ appeared who execated the _fotegoingappeared ^-T^rbed ^'n'^an^ wfa*’ executed the foregoing »>e .they, eaeouted the sa„e as his (their) free act and deed. y/^ notary /PUBla LC notary SplR^rccr^i'i^* ”................... my commission EXFI kES uiiiiwiTmi ) t>Rbe )ss. COUNTY OF mJlllli'FTII ) STATE OF •* On this /T day oj —iii^\ount.v, persoMf^ly appeared . rnst^!»ent! person IS r described executed the same as hisand acknowledged that he (they) execui:® (their) free act and deed. 19B^, before men f/bSJh^Ay^ ^ NOTARY ■;3 i MOTASY PUBLIC, SYAYE Of FLCRIOA. MV COMMISSION EAPIRC3: OCT. 29. 19»». •OMOEO THUU HOftkmt NU«ClC U#»OftlBW«if Page S of 5 City of ORONO CITY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829_________ ORQNQ A RBSOLOTION GRANTING A RENEWAL VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1540 WHEREAS, Ronald and Julie Prineas (hereinafter **the legally described as follows: Per Exhibit "A", attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a renewal of variances granted in 1989 per Resolution #2650 to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1540. 2. The property is located in the LR“1A Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed this application #1410 on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The lot area exceeds the minimum 2.0 dry buildable acre requirement. B) A feasible building envelope exists in primary and alternate drainfield sites which have been tested and approved for use. C) The hardship to the property lies in its «xtreme narrowness at the point where measured. Furthermore, there is no adjacent available for purchase that would increase the defined lot width to the 200* minimum standard. Page 1 of 5 r CllY ORoria City of OR.ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2829 A The Henneoin County Department of Public Works has t;ri?ied that the County will approve a private driveway access onto County Road 15. 5. Although the property contains a ®ite, that site is limited by narrowness of the lot and by the designated drainfield sites, hence careful site planning will^be required in developing the property. Therefore, it is appropriate that a diagram of thedrainfield sites be filed with this resolution to make future potential buyers of the property aware of the site limitations. 6. The City Council originally granted this variance in 1989 per Resolution #2650 and finds no changes from the original findings and conditions of that resolution. 7 The City Council has considered this application including the* findings and recommendations of the Planning commission, report^ by City staff, applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply to other property in this zoning district; that variance would not adversely affect traffic light, air nor pose a fire hazard or to neighboring property; would not merely serve convenience to the applicants, but f®“f alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difflcul necessary'to preserve a substantial property right of the apHictnl.; and would be in keeping intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensi-^e- Plan of t City. COMaUSZONS, ORDER AHD COMDITIWIS Base^ upon one or more of the findings noted ^he Orono City Council hereby grants a renewal t Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) construction of a single family residence on this lot Sidth 30* where a 200* defined lot width is normally retired fo construction of a single family residence, su j following conditions: page 2 of 5 r. * • CITY ORONQ City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829 _________ 1. Any proposed residence must meet the required minimum setbacks es^tablished for the LR-IA zoning district, and must further meet the required setback! from drainfield sites. 2. A diagram of the building envelope and approved drainfield sites shall be attached to this resolution as Exhibit "B", to advise future potential buyers of the property of the building site limitations. 3. Any proposed residence or development of the property shall meet the hardcover requirements of the LR-IA zoning district. 4. No other zoning variances for development of this property will be granted. 5. The approved access for the property is a single drive­ way at County Road 15. 6. The standard park fee shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit is issued. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 9, 1991). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as o misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of .the property. page 3 of 5 • • ^ :N' •V / \ b, CLIY I I OF tORQNa City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829_________ Adopted by the City Council of the Minnesota at a regular Tneeting held on the 9th day of • ATT »T: allin# City ClerJc ‘r 'n JaneT»e^ "r 'Grabe perty Owner (<s) STATE OP MINNESOTA ) } ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foreaoing instrument was acknowledged before me on .-K.. aeh dat o?7°lv? 1990, by James B. Grabek t Dorothy M. Hailing Mayor S cit^ clerk of the City of Sunicipil corporation and said instrument was executed on behalt of the City. Notary Public srjSwSoS IS7-S.W*SiSTiSi »««■ IK- “*• Page 4 of S ■ S1 4 'fi 1 if* { m ■; J CLtY QRONQ City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2829_________ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE ) SS. ) 199On this ^_ _ _ _ day of -- - - - - - - - - - l^efore me a Notary Public within and’^for sa^ county, personally appeared Ronald James Prineas, joint owner, Known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ej_ _ t:) NOTARY PUBLIC hotary pmic STATE SlY COMMISSIONBonoco tmru general IRS. UHD* STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF DADE On thi s day of )ss. ) or «aid 1990 f before me a Jotary Public within and for ^aid '‘County^personally appeared Julienne (Julie) Prineas# joint owner known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC ROTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIOA HY CO»t«SSIOR EXP. AU6,31,«9J BOMDEO THRU GENERAL IRS. UND. Page 5 of 5 o o k* !j.«^ !^-‘ \ 4*•❖.'J^j-aKo VesbO^^ CITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. :^979 A RBSOLUTIOM GRANTING A RSNBNAL VARIANCE TO municipal zoning code SECTION 10.23f SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1648 NBEREA8, Ronald and Julie Prineas (hereinafter "t|j® applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1920 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Per Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WBERBASr the applicants have applied to the City for a renewal of a variance granted in 1989 per Resolution #2650 and previously renewed in 1990 per Resolution #2829 to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to perroxt the construction of a single family residence on a lot of defined width 30* where a defined lot width of 200' is normally required. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1648. 2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed this application #1410 on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The lot area exceeds the minimum 2.0 dry buildable acre requirement. B) A feasible building envelope exists in addition to primary and alternate drainfield sites which have een tested and approved for use. C) The hardship to the property lies its extreme narrowness at the point where the defined lot width is measured. Furthermore, there is no adjacent land available for purchase that would increase the defined lot width to the 200’ minimum standard. Page 1 of 5 o o CITYofORONO A, The Hcrnepin County Department of Public Works has RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ___^79 verified that the County will approve a private driveway access onto County Road 15* 5. Although the property contains a feasible building site# that site is limited by narrowness of the lot and by the designated dralnfleld sites, hence careful site planning will be required in developing the property. Therefore, it is appropriate that a diagram of the building envelope and drainfield sites be filed with this resolution to make future potential buyers of the property aware of the site limitations. 6. The City Council originally granted this variance in 1989 per Resolution #2650 and finds no changes from the original findings and conditions of that resolution. A request for renewal was granted per Resolution #2829 in 1990. 7. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a renewal variance to M^icipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) construction of a single family residence on this lot of defined width 30* where a 200* defined lot width is normally required for construction of a single family residence, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 o o--•% 'o CITYofORONO ■ t^ ,»;> A--) 4* ^^Mesho"^l.“^Anv proposed residence must meet the required minimum RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2979 setbacks established for the LR-IA zoning district, and must further meet the required setbacks from drainfield lines. 2. A diagram of the building envelope and approved drainfield sites shall be attached to this resolution as Exhibit "B", to advise future potential buyers of the property of the building site limitations. 3, Any proposed residence or development of the property shall meet the hardcover requirements of the LR-IA zoning district. 4. No other zoning variances for development of this property will be granted. 5. The approved access for the property is a single drive­ way at County Road 15. 6. The standard park fee shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit is issued. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive y and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date {July 8, 1992). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned applicants have read, *?$ hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on t^haiz of themselves, their heirs, successors and agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain ot title of the property. Page 3 of 5 in ///bII 4 <V O \! v’^ 4*-" CITYofORONO yy RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2979 Xdopted by the City Council of the City of Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 8th day of July» 1991 ATTBSTi ') /Cklul Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor rty Owner(8) OF MINNESOTA ) ) 88. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of July* 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson s Dorothy M. Hallin* Mayor « City Clerk of the City of Orono* a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. UNDA & va Page 4 of 5 '' '' m. O \ ' ^■r'^ V o iU : jt CITY of ORONO V>, STATE^TJF BfllNESOTA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2979_________ COUNTY OP HENNEPIN 88. The foregoing iK^trumi^t was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of July, 1991^ M Barbara A. Peterson 6 Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk/of the City of Orono, « municipal corporation and s^d instrument was executed on behalt of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary Public On this _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ day of _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _^- - - -r l^^fore me a Notary Public within andforsaid county, personally appeared known to me to be the personCs) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary Public ) ss. ) On this day of r-199 / before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally apoeared ^ known to me to be" ‘ ' ' ■ • It . who executed the foregoingthe person(sJ descrlb'ed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. /L . jij^ZixrrC Notary Huolic /- Page 5 cf 5 ■ 1^’o»r*o\CM S H s U BXtllBlT A RB80LUT10M NO Pqgs.rliAt32ii» . . TrocfcB A OMd »» nogletorea Lan«l Ourvey Ho. 96, FI lea oE Registrar of Titles* County of Hennepin* and that port of hot Sin 16) lying Southuontorly oC a line draun across said lot parallel to and 105 feet Northeasterly from the Soutliweotorly lino of said lot* Auditor's Subdislslon Nutidiar 356* Hennepin County* Minnesota* according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in tho Office of the Roglotror of Titles of Hennepin County, nit easement for road purposes over tho Westerly 20 feet of Lot 5* Auditor s Subdivision Musftier 350* lleitnepin County* Minnesota. 9 l<rovCN ; B H 3ZO »o • I loo* «• ^ P«M»A>/ I)«A,M«r.l:. Sir. & : At-Te«NAT« strr(i„o„^t\ I« Sc Aue /"‘/cb! . rw**' •»*‘itwv ry CMMAeite Aiioc.^,.- iA «^3caci AH- s 2 • i.7 H ;■■ -V • • p.e^ouA.noA) A?o. 3kctcH OF BuiubAAtg' !:; Lore ANb !£>iiArAjrietb Sires 1 ..•5 ; t ? , 1 I I It •.*• • ■ *•I. RESOLUTION #2979 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO I Dorothy M. Hallln, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on July 8 _ _ _ _ __, 1991 and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 15 th day of llln. City Clerk (SEAL) ^ » I’.*.' ;..v- ■4 IW'k / To:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator COUNCILllEnillQ may 10 1993 From: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator^ ___aiYOFOBOW May 5, 1993 Forest Arms Siltation Matter Attached arc two additional items of information for this file. The first is a copy of the soundings that were done by the Association this spring, through the ice. They clearly indicate that the silt is a<yt»wiulating in a U-shape area in the lake bottom just out from the storm sewer. This is information that would be needed by the DNR if a permit application was made. Also included is a copy of the dock layout approved a few days ago by the LMCD. This layout thc sidc sctbacks, and results in one rather than two slips being affected by the siltation. Slip #14 likely will become marginally useable or unusable towards the end of the mmmgf if the lake level drops per its normal cycle. This dock configutatioi: does not eliminate the depth problem caused by Staff met with Mr. Lange, Mr. Norman, and Mrs. Kalweit on Ntoy 5th a^ discuss^ tbe various issues involved with solving the siltation problem. The Association will be meeting in the next few weeks and likely will request to meet with Council in late May or early June. If there is additional information Council would like in tne interim, please let me know, — 6! K if-90 « « ■I-------------. 1 i . /%1• 1 P* —— « /..^e— iif 3V „-^ - ^ •V ' /^- s>^| ,\. . ii/L ^V—Tl1.•-» 1 ' • /^ Jf t ^ - i yj j/I • * •T ./2-- /wir /'7V 9? ?. 90 7 • / / -1^ /AJctfeS o *. 30' —;HO -- -30Ukt I; h' I*tA' H F TYP ■ ■ ® r 1 1 1*. 21'1mm 4- W • (10) 11* X 32* Slips 2-11 (4) 11* X 21* Slips 1. 12-14 ■tl !UL.\ » To; From: Date: Subject: /3 nm MAY 1 0 1993 Assistant Planning & Zoning ^<^niinistrator^||YQpgm|Q Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilntembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator April 27, 1993 Annual Joint Use Dock License - Enlow/Lindahl/Rhode Uuer List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - Proposed Resolution Application Staff Letter 4/15/93 Applicant Letter 4/22/93 Mr. Rhode has sold his property to Mr. Lauer, hence the name change noted above This joint use dock located at 3155 North Shore Drive (Lauer’s property) provides a total of three slips, two of which are for two off-lake property owners pursuant to pre-existing easements and variance Resolution No. 1212 approved by the City Council in 1980. is limited to three slips by that resolution. Since Mr. Rhode had made all previoM ^)pliMdons, none of the property owners were aware of the three-slip limit. Their application initially indicated four slips, but the correspondence between Mr. Lindahl and staff has established that they are modifying their application to three slips per previous licenses. Note that the proposed dock layout is simUar but not identical to the previ^ layout. Since Orono does not s*wifically regulate slip sizes or dock lengths, and smee this proposal appears to meet LMCD s setback and maximum length requirements (at a level of three boats I am advised by LMCD that they don’t require a license), the layout appears acceptable. There have been no complaints regarding this joint use dock, This application was accepted after the due date without penalty fee because the City had initially sent the application form to Mr. Rhode, and we had to later resend it to Mr. Lindahl. Staff Ree On' H endatii Staff recommends approval of a 1993 Joint Use Dock License to the owners of property located at 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North Shore Drive, and 1406 Bohn’s Point Road, per the attached resolution. MOTION:Ayes,Nays. f ^ RESOLUTION DlKECl'ING STAFF TO ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE TO THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3155 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, 3185 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, AND 1406 BOHN*S POINT ROAD SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1993 TO DECEMBER 31, 1993 WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, State Statute 412. et. seq. and Stole Statute 462, et. scq., to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City; and WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the I^partment of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the navigable waters involves an exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono, all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of the public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated, may be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the DNR. LMCD, and the City of Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to residential owners and the commerci^ marina owners to the extent prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoming their property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian owners, whether or not they be commercial marinas or residential owners; WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment exists b.twMn and is shared by riparian owners and the public generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privilege* over Lake Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the navigable depth of the public waters. There can be no dispute but that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka has the right to use the entire surface area of Lake Minnetonka for all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This right is a right not only to members of the public but the right to each riparian owner. Page 1 of 2 This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no exclusive privileges to these rights; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the limited riparian rights; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations regarduig the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more families, which regulations include the annual Ucensing of Joint Use Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use Dock License described on Exhibit A attached, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs the Sttff to issue a Joint Use Dock License according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A attached. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Or day of May, 1993. at their meeting on the 10th ATTEST: Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May,. 1993 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of tte City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT A RESOLtTION NO. rONniTIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE I. LICENSEE: Property owners of 3155 North Shore Drive, 3185 North Shore Drive and 1406 Bohn’s Point Road Dock Address: 3155 North Shore Drive Agent: B. John Lindahl, Jr. Address: 1406 Bohn’s Point Road, Wayzata, MN 55391 Licensee is: XX unincorporated homeowner’s group incorporated homeowner’s association unincorporated club or recreation group incorporated club or recreation group other______________________ License Period - January 1. 1993 to December 31, 1993 II. BOAT DENSITY The number of in-place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed the number shown on the attached plan. Exhibit B, and in accordance with Resolution 938, in r-o case shall the number of authorized ooat slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number peimitted in the prior year’s license. Authorized Boat Density per attached plan: Bay Transient (Day use only) Slips Permanent Moorage Slips Boat Lifts Sub-Total: Slips at Dock Offshore Buoys Maximum Boats in Water Maximum Boats per prior license MAXIMUM BOAT DENSITY Crystal 1 1 Exceedi'^ this maximum boat density, or exceeding the number of permitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject to revocation and/or prosecution for violation of Section 5.42 Subdivision 2 of the Orono Municipal Code. 7 i I 1 Exhibit A Resolution No. Page 2 lU. DOCK LAYOUT The dock structure or layout authorized by this license shall be as shown on attached Exhibit D. Any changes in this layout shall be subject to prior review and approval of the City Council. IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of the City and/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to full compliance with these conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions is cause for license revocation and/or prosecution by the City. This license is granted subject to the findings and conditions set forth in Resolution #1212 of the City council, summarized as follows: a) The three properties to which this Joint Use Dock License is granted are described as follows: i) (P.I.D. #09-117-23 33 0001) "That part of Gov’t Lot 1 lying East of the West 442.93 feet thereof and North of the South 1038.3 feet thereof and South of Registered Land Survey No 269" <3155 North Shore Drive) ii) (P.I.D. #09-117-23 33 0015) "Tract I and the West 28.5 feet of Tract H, Registered I .and Survey No. 269" (1406 Bohn’s Point Road) iii) (P.I.D. #09-117-23 33 0016) "Tract G and that part of Tract H lying East of the West 28.5 feet thereof, Registered Land Survey No. 269" (3185 North Shore Drive) b) There shall be only one dock allowed on the Lauer lot (P.I.D. 09-117-23 33 0001) which dock shall be no greater than 100 feet in length, and which dock must be constructed in accordance with all applicable City and LMCD ordinances, and which dock is intended to serve only the owners and their successors of the 3 properties described in a) above. c) On the Lauer lot (P.I.D. 09-1 17-23 33 0001) either attached to the dock, moored in front of the lot or located on the lot, there may not be at any time more than three watercraft, as defined by the LMCD, either docked, moored, or stored. d) The three watercraft allowed may be owned only by the owners of the properties described in a) above. V. Nothing in this license shall confer upon any person for the benefit of any property any vested right to use Lake Minnetonka or the premises in a manner permitted by this resolution, but the use of Lake Minnetonka and the premises shall remain subject to such regulations and ordinances as the City and other competent regulatory authorities shall deem necessary from time to time in the public interest. , c* *• AJ®< /1S6» • 198-^ ■ n&s' ■ n6^ - nio ' 3 Si..'»s •2, 3M(=>i ■ 3 sup^ 3, 5C4P5 iq*} 2.-3 SUPS ^Mir cL-tf n CITY OF ORONO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 LICENSE YEAR 19 > C rjrw nr I J u’/ t-'t'VItU* u Mcrrrr r U*l * ^ VW A w'A w'w*VV'WV' aknttal joint use dock license application Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.42 .■•i < *ry Tl »u 25.^0 L.vfa Ji 23.00 !<£CEIPT-THA^!(, YOU n2iS'i50 CCvl Date Form Sent by City Staff Febniaiv 1, 1993 j , Date Application Returned to Cit)'__—L,—LEi3..^—--------------------------------------------- Fee Received $ --------------By Employee SecUon 5.42, Subdivision 2. i TCFNSE REQUIRED - It is unlawful for any (group or association of persons or families, more than two in number, whether incorporated or not) to engage or participate in ... joint use (of any lakeshore property) without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE complete ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY MARCH 1 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. I.k i--- “rV ^ ‘ i • A.SS0C1AT10N INFORMATION 1. Association title or name (if any) H.«2. 3. 4. KloS>l^ Bay Person responsible for this application: Name ______ Pit Mailing Address l*^OC* iSo Relationship to association__ Association is (check applicable items): ^ unincorporated homeowner’s group. ____ incorporated Homeowner’s Association. ____ unincorporated club or recreation group. ____ incorporated club or recreation group. Page 1 of 5 W E p____ Ho r.. 1 Principsl purpose of joint use dock is (check applicable items). A provide boat mooring and lake access for residential propert>'. provide swimming access, beach, or offshore dock, provide a club or association gathering place for activities. 6.Dock is located on (check applicable item): K one member’s private property. easement or outlot owned in common. property leased by the group/association, property owned by the group/association. 7.List Dock location and ownership information: ^ 3lSS~ kL/CTH Zkw.Street address ______ Legal property description_______________ piD# e<? ~/f» -33 - 3b • Listed property owner(s) 8.Names of abuttinjg lakeshore property owners: jv . (Name + Address) _ . A4 w7X- (Name + Address) Names of other affected property owners: gt)^3>8f _ fName + Address) (attach sheet if necessmy) 9. ^ame + Address) (attach sneet it nece^ry; ^ IniuraSS? ^oveS^^Th^jiS^iS^ d<it®if inaredb'y one of the following: property owner’s homeowner’s policy, separate group/association owned policy. ^ ^ mList the following information: Name of insured_____V s!D a »J v >A vi Name of insurance carrier Name of insurance agency Policy No.Policy No. __________________Effective date of coverage -------------------- Amount of coverage: Public liability, per person, per occurrence $— Public liability, per occurrence $_3©£t_£®^ Page 2 of 5 iffk I. * 10. Security and policing of the jointly used dock and property' is provided by (check applicable items): ____ fencing ____ security lighting property owner’s presence ____ contract security service ____ other (specify)________________________ iK—' ■ I-" ii#m--- MrJ’t'- ‘ f • hmM POCK INFORMATION 11. List Dock Use Area Specifications: Width of shoreline: / j O ft. Length of main dock from shore: ft. Dock setbacks from side property lines at shore: ____ ft. and —----- ft. Dock Construction (check applicable items): X seasonal dock (relocated or replaced each year) ____ permanent pUing with seasonal deck ____ permanent piling and decking 12. 13. *X wooden decking ____ metal decking List Dock Accessories: Number of fire extinguishers available at the dock Number of life preservers available at the dock lO 14. 15. List number of slips in each category ("slips" includes boat lifts): Transient (day use onlv) slips Transient (day use) off-shore m oys ---------- Permanent moorage slips__^ Permanent moorage off-sho.-e buoys -------- Dry storage (rack) slips ___________ Maximum number of boats at the dock____ List number of off-street parking spaces available for users of the joint use dock. Parking, if provided must not be separated from the dock by any public road. spaces. F.R0S10N AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 16. Shore! metal seawall other (specify) lice is protec ___ Stone rip rap ___ X gx^sTmd^egetation only concrete seawall 17.Depth of water at shoreline: (0 ft; at 50 ft. out: ■s3^^; at 100 ft. out. ^— Page 3 of 5 * k p.' REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: A.nOTK PLAN - AIU APPLICATIONS A dock plan, drawn to scale, showing the shoreline width of this property, the side property lines and the location, layout and dimensions of all docks, slips and buoys. If off-street parking, dry storage or other on-land functions are intended, these also should be shown on the plan. B TTNTNCORPORATED OR ASSOCIATIONS A list of the names and mailing addresses of all members and/or slip users 2. A certified copy of the by-laws or agreement for joint use. Note: This copy is not reouired if the applicant initials and certifies the following staicincnt; •This is a renewal plication and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same by-laws or agreement originally made in (state year) and on file with the City. Applicant’s initials C.TNrnRPORATED CLUBS OR ASSOCIATIONS >j/a- 0 '• 2. A list of the names, mailing addresses and titles of all corporation officers. A statement as to the total number of members in the club or association, members 3.A certified copy of the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the corporation. Note: These copies are not reouired if the applicant initials and certifies the following statement: "This is a renewal iqiplicatioo and our joint use dock is to be operated under the same articles of incorporation and/or by-laws as originally made or last amentM in - year) and on file with the City.” _ Applicant’s initials D. ANNUAL LICENSE FEE • ALL APPUCATIONS Joint Use Dock License Application Fee according to the current C ty Fee Schedule INITIAL APPUCATION FEE RENEWAL JOINT USE FEE, per year pf t T.s SI .TP FEE for each permanent moorage slip, lift, dry stack, or buoy y slips 2.00 each $ $20.O0 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ $ I Page 4 of 5 J/rT" 0—c ^ ° J TV J I.ATE FEE - Renewals Application for renewal of licenses shall be made no later than March 1 of the lice^ year. Iflc r\ty shall not renewal license applications received after March \ unlggsjhe appUcappfl l^yi^.^pipanied bv a late fee of S25.00. ^KVTRW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the application will be reviewed by tte City t^uncU and, in the case of new or unusual applications, also by the Planning Comnussion and Manna Committee. The Council will pass upon the applicat on after complete review. THE SUBJECT DOCK MAY BE INSTALLED AND/OR OPENED FOR USE ONLY ITPON APPROVAL OF THE UCENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby City Council to review this Joint Use Dock License Applicauon, and agrees and authorizes A City of Orono and the City’s employees and agents to ente- upon the property at any reasonable time to performjafi^t^d code compliance inspections. h i Signed ^ Page 5 of 5 i' !• L trv .ir 1 I. t.. B’ M-i fe.;, i: 3°^-o.,. 0\.»/ *4 ^ ' -i *''v —-•' w CITYofORON Municipal Offices Post Office Bot 66 Cr\^ Bav, Mlniiaou 5532>-l April 15, 1993 John Lindahl 1406 Bohn’s Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Joint Use Dock License Application Dear Mr. Lindahl: We are in receipt of your annual Joint Use Dock License application for the joint use dock located at 3155 North Shore Drive. I note your application requests four dock slips. I am enclosing a copy of City of Orono variance Resolution No. 1212 dated October 14,1980, which resolution limits this joint use dock to three slips. Periiaps you were not aware of this limitation. Rather your application on to the Council with a recommendation for denial, I wanted to give you the opportunity to revise it to meet the three-sUp requirement. Alternatively, if you wish to pursue approval of the fourth slip, this would be an amendment to Resolution No. 1212 and would require a new variance application. You should also be aware that the fourth slip may trigger an LMCD review. I am advised by LMCD staff that your 130’ shoreline width would not qualify for a fourth slip. Please review this with the Enlows and the Lauers. and advise me as soon as possible how you wish to proceed. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaj Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/lsv cc: Thomas Enlow, 3185 North Shore Drive Ron Lauer, 3155 North Shore Drive Enclosure TELEPHONE-473-7357 • FAX-47MJ10 B. John Lindahl . Jr 22 April, 1993 TO: FROM: DATS: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 5, 1993 /. counolhsim MAY 1 0 1993 CnYOfOMNO SUBJECT: West Hennepin Pioneer Museum (Marge Gasch) Presentation Regarding the Former City Council Chambers Building Marge Gasch has presented a proposal to City staff concerning the preservation and relocation of the former Council Chambers building. The proposal is as follows; 1. Relocate the Council Chambers building to the northwest corner of the new city facilities property. 2. Develop a shared parking arrangement with the school district for use of the church building parking lot. 3. The building would be used to display items related to the history of Orono. The building would be readily available to students as well as the general public. 4. Funding for this project would be obtained from a number of sources both public and private. 5. One proposed funding source is the sale of one building site at the current location of the council chambers building. A portion of the proceeds would go toward the expenses related to the relocation of the building. Staff's response to the prop, sal was as follows: 1. The City Council does not currently have plans to demolish the city council building. 2. The Crystal Bay neighborhood residents have suggested the building could be used for a park related use in its current location. 3. The proposal for relocating the building to the new city property would have to be reviewed by the Council. 4. The Council is currently weighing two other options for the use of the Crystal Bay property including the site of the council chambers building. One option is to retain all of the property for public use. The other option is to sell a portion and use the proceeds to assist in funding of the new city facilities project. Ms. Gasch has requested that the Council respond to item #1 of her proposal - relocating the council chambers building to the new city property so that she knows whether to proceed with the other items in her proposal. WESTERN HENNEPIN COUNTY PIONEERS ASSOCIATION Newsletter #92 April. 199-^Paye 1 The Oruno Town Hall, Its Builders and a Bit of Its History Not very many of Orono's Hisiormil Puhlic ItuiUirifis are left. I'hink ahotu a Hesuh the Orono Town Hall, there is the Hill Se/u>ol. the Siuhh.\ Bay School and the C ry.ual Ba\ Presbyterian Church. Marge Casch is working to preserve the old Orono Town Hall Ij you feel it she)uld he saved, let your voice Ih’ heard It's too late after it has been destrovcd Orono Township was formed in ISS9. 1 he Orono Town Hull was built in 1900. It was used until the close of 1992. Other buildings had to be obtained to house offices, road equipment, police personnel, etc. but the old Town Hall was still used for around S6 years. 4 I; ..w.' .1 ! ’^1 r The Orono Village Town Hall, built in 1906 Cecil Clyde Gideon The contractor, who built it, was Cecil Clyde Gideon. The mason was Monroe Nystrom. The material they used was clay tiles, 12"xl() "x6 ' wide with two square holes through the tile. They were used for the founJition with 2x4's for floor framing. The walls were made of the clay tile also, with stucco on the outside. When Cecil Gideon hired Roger M. Stubbs to haul the freight car load of square hollow red tile for the railroad siding at Crystal Bay. he warned Roger to be careful not to chip the comers, as they were to be used on the exterior of the building. Roger Stubbs bought specially- built, heavy-duty springs to put on the axle bolsters under the wagon box. Very few buildings left are made of this tile. The Stubbs Movers moved one at St. John’s Llniversity and knew of another building in Red Wing. Cecil Clyde Gideon was bom in a log cabin at Brackett’s Point on lx)ng Lake. Mimtesoia on September 9, 1879. His father was Charles Sumner Gideon, .son of Peter Gideon, the honiculiurist. His mother was Rachel Caroline Stubbs Gideon, bom of a Quaker family in Ohio. ((.om. page 4) Newsletter #92 April. 199^Page 2 Museum News Bill Stubbs and Jim Roehl will be giving a presentation on Stubbs Bay - North Shore Lake Minnetonka history for the Richfield Historical Society on April 6th at 7:30 pm at Richfield Community Center. Remodelling is being done in our upstairs Hall, which will give the Museum more room in that area. It should be enough to accomodate some display cases. We also look forward to adding the addition to the Carriage House in the near future. Accessions A collection of rare coins was received from Steve Applebaum, Golden Valley; Jim Mulvanny donated an old pop or beer bottle from John Cund Brewing Co., La Crosse, Wi.sconsin and a half*pint milk or cream bottle; from Meredith Rettinger, a piano scarf that had belonged to Mrs. Newhall; Vemice White gave the original copy of Moses Mason's citizenship papers dated Sept. 2S. 1897; from Joan Kittok, Delano, some articles of clothing, knickers, blouses and aprons. Coming Events Memorial Day Parade: May 31, Pioneer Museum, 8:45 am. March with us down Highway 12 to the Union Cemetery where the annual Decontion Day service will be held. Dairy Berry Festival: June 19. Independence Town Hall, 2-S pm. Celebrate the Grand Opening of our new museum in Independence! After months of hard work, we're going to have a party to celebrate the opening of the Independence Town Hall Museum. There will be plenty of Ice Cre^ and berries, and we're hoping Tammy does some magic and finds animals for our petting zoo. Buckhom Day: June 26, Nelson Beach, Long Lake 4-10 pm. Join us for a lakeside western event, ala the old Buckhom. The Pioneer Museum is working with the Long Lake Chamber and the Orono Lions to put on this grand event. There will be a carp fis!iing contest, volley ball tournament, and games and craft activities for children. For lunch and dinner we will be serving buffalo burgers, chicken and hot dogs. There will be a fireworks display to end the day. Horse Tale Hunk Sherer and Bud Eisinger share an amusing story that l^pened in the mid-thirties in the Depression Era. It happened at Altort Crosby's Estate near Woodhill Country Club. They had a workhorse race. The horses had to be 'hum workhorses'. There were no saddles. The rider rode bareback. Whe winner got five bucks. There were six or seven horses in this race. One was a big Belgian, not built for racing, and he dropped out early in the race. Charlie Scherer, Hunk's fater, had a team of Morgan horses, Molly and Peggy. Cleius Scherer rode Molly, Peggy was fast, but she was hard to ride. She tended to throw you up on her neck, so nobody wanted to ride Peggy. Joe Finger, who was a "jack-of-all-trades", came up to Charlie and said. "I'll ride her." The race started. They were off and running. Molly was in the lead, 'fhey mi«de the first turn. Peggy made the turn, but Joe Finger didn't. He flew into a tree. Peggy turned around lor a split second and saw she had no rider. She started whinnying for her male. Molly, up in front, started whinnying, too. and Cletus is trying to figure out what's going on. Peggy dug in her heels and all of a sudden. Cletus sees Peggy alcmgside without her rider. The two sorrels, Molly and Peggy, and a black came in close together, but the two sorrels had the edge on the black. The other horses stopped, but Peggy kept going and made anol! er loop. Charlie was calling, ' Come, Peggy! Come, Peggy!” and she ran over to him. Mr. Crosby handed Cletus a five-dollar bill and gave Charlie one also, for Peggy's race. Canterbury Downs never had a race like that! I' Newsleuef #92 April. 1993 JiUiLi Commuoity E4uc«tioo Profrans by Liz Olson cbsaetav e hat been t |icM Msiovy expcnenoc I i ^ Moceu with smdents from the Orono School District. Our expcfienoet wMh small classes, which fuaramee individuahaed attention MS lesni about the past by workinf with museum artifacts in a structured caviidaant and iKa discuning how they were toed in day-io-day life. The students also have a lot of fwi at canro • dwe's always tomediing to make, or a mess lo help clean-up! This year we've had two Pioneer ump sessions, a one-day camp January 25, and a three day camp the first week of MMch. Winter Play Day was the title of the January program and fun and games were the order of the day. The students prepared venison stew and buttermilk biscuits for their lunch that day. while Linda McGinty and Liz CXson talked widi them about pioneer life. Once the chores were out of the way it was time to play. Bill Cadey. a great entertainer and storyteller, spent the afternoon with the students MloiMDes nom the "good old days”, and of course there was time to playteaching them sonp and outside in our Minnesota snow! Pioneer Canqp in Match was a \onmet program, which allowed for a more in-depth study of the past The studknts qtent one morning ante farm of Hunk Scherer learning about sausage-making They also loured the tractor bam and visited with die herd 0( cows. We had hoped to learn how to tap sugar nubile trees, bu the weMher was too cold for the sq> lo be running. Tom Geelan stopped in to visit the students with his marioiieM e of Abnlmn Uncofat It was amazing how much work goes into making a puppet and how hard kiBMl ba tohMpdm Mringi foon getting tangled up. Studenu modeled ckshing from museum displays for AdiA History Ihqr. Root row: Ariel Dumas, Amy Anderson. Omrie Anderson and Kari Wald. Back row: Vicki Hebzynski, Jeff Carlson. Lindsay Miller, Holly Brown. Sarah Maiser, Kim Bilick and Elizabeth Nadeau. The other activity we all participated in was the creating, directing and acting in an improvisational play. The play was the story of the Wolsfeld Family as they moved from the Old World to Minnesota. The students were divided into four groups and each group was one act of the play. Act One was in the Vitorian Room, where the family made the decision to move to North America. The Music Room vs as the scene of Act Two, where the family was waiting at the steamboat launch fOT the trip up the Mississippi River to St. Anthony. Act Three was in the General Store, where the family bought the provisions ^y thought they'd need at their new homestead. The final scene. Act Four, took place in the log schoolhouse (which had been transformed into a pioneer family home) where the family was finally settled in and entertaining their neighbors. (Programs com. on page \) A M I ■•.Vft %■ ■I W ‘ ■' > il ,v/^ 4•'ii ■A m M m 'V If rtitWr - ■J. -------- I- ■i fir It ■ Newsletter #92 April. 1993 Page 4 Old Orono Town Hall Builders (continued from page I) Times were hard and Cecil had to quit school after 8th grade. He worked for his room and board while attending school and afterward. He trapped furs. He wcHited for George Tumham on road building. He tried logging in northern Minnesota but returned to the Minnetonka area. Things improved and he was aMe to find work. At age 20 he married Elma Stubbs. He worked at the Wayzata Boat Works and im(noved his skills by taking a correspondence course in carpentry. Gideon started contracting when he was about 24 or 25 years old. He built a house for his sister Mabe and Gene Fertel in Wayzata and fcNr his folks across the lake (typical hip roof design). He built the Bederwood School (Stubbs Bay), the Orono Town Hall and the big house north of the Town Hall for EbnCT Talbert He built a house for C. R. Brackett at his Meadowb^k Dairy Farm and one for John Leslie, the paper magnate. He helped Charles Stubbs tebuUd after the fire (about 1912). He built a large home in Ladysmith. Wisconsin for N. J. Smith, president of Kenosha Paper Company, and many others of which we have no record. Then for a year he wt^ed in the Sl Cloud area. Cecil Gideon met A. R. Van Dyck and Phelps Wyman, prominent Minneapolis architects, who had just letunied fiom Custer State Park, South Dakota. They designed the lodge for the South Dakott State Game and Fisn Association and wanted Gideon to build it Wyman recommended him to Governor Peter Norbeck of South Dakota and he was hired. This was in 1918. Gideon came b^k to St. Qoud and got his family and they moved to South Dakota. In an interview with Avery Stubbs, Cecil Gideon tells of his experiences: */ was put in charge cf a bunch of convicts to build headquarters for the State Game Commission in Custer Park. We had a saw mill and sawed the lumber to build and dried it in a too. We had to get this from ! was head carpentered had 32 years to build it. Once the budding burned and we had to rebuild, i was gamek^fer the first mater. / was Warden and Sherifffor six years.” K,ammustonin%.,uster ram. we naa a saw nuu ana sawea me u gartme where we had heat. I got a machine to do our miUwoHt, St. Paul. ! was paid $7J0 a dixyfor this dangerous jtdt. I wash convicts unda^ me. It took two years to build it. Once the brnUk Giaydon McCulley tells this story about his Uncle Cecil: “One day in the convicts'bunkhouse, they were all standing around. A mouse ran up the corner ^ die walb and across the upper wtUl. Uncle Cecil ^t the head off the mouse. The respect was immediate.titt Later, the State Hsh and Game Headquarters was expanded and made into a State Game Lodge Hotel for tourists. Ptesident Cot^ge stayed in it in 1927. They had but two weeks notice before Coolidfe arrived. Gideon designed and built Coc^ge Inn to house die retinue of newsmen and Secret Service that fidlow a president The 34 summer enqiloyees were drafted to work on its construction. Gideon was coached by Colonel Starling of White House Secret Service on necessary and proper proiootd. Gideon rode horseback with Coolidge to the fishing holes as his personal guide and companion. He was there when Cotdidge fell in the water, a story that never made the press until years after Cotdidge died. Gideon was taciturn and dghtlipped, which made men like uoolidge and Nofteck (governer and later, senator), respect and trust him. Without Coolidge's three month visit in 1927, Gutzon Borglum, the sculpts, and local supporters mi^t not have received the finances necessary to get the Mt. Rushmoie project started. Coolidge. in ms dedication speech at the monument site, offer^ to pledge matching federal monies for donations. i* I ■ii ■ 4 '1 -j li ------------ Ncwsietter #92 April. 1991 Page 5 Cecil Gideon's daughter Elizabeth McDonald tells this about her father and mother: "Before the State Game Lodge was finished, prominent Eastern vacationers flocked in, wanting meats and lodging. Tfuts it was that the builders (the Gideons) turned into hosts, or proprietors, as they were called then. They were so popular that they remained there for twenty seven years. In that span of time. Mother handled the Game Lodge while Dad took the "Dudes" on horseback trips, overnight camping, buffcdo round-ups and such. Dad loved the lulls from the moment he saw them, and the best way t ctm tell you about his accomplishments is to simply list them. He designed the intricate "Pig-TaiT bridges, which government engineers said could notposs^ be dome. There was an area on the "Iron Mounttun Ro^" where it was not possUde to put in a road that would "lift" a traveler from a lower elevation to a higher one without oddity miles and miles of highway. Everybody said it could not be d^ until Senator Peter Norbeck suggested that Dad try his hand at it. Andsohedrew the plans for a series of log circles or bridges. They stood for twenty years without repair. Later, steel was added for reinforcement _built the State Game Lodge, which is now a National Historic Site. The central part cf the lodge is very much like it was in 1919-1920... designal and built the studio for a very eccentric and famous sculptor. Gutton Borghun... Dad and Senator Norbeck mapped out the Iron Mountain Road where there are three tunnels, all cf which offer a view of Mount Rushmore as you drive thrtutgh... .and built the most breathing summer home for the Peter Norbecks. Its serentiy and beauty defy description. Named "Valhalla" by the Norbedts, the btdkdng has beat donated to the State Game and Fish Commission." 0TL PI F ?i ^ Monroe Nystrom was an expert mason. He and helper George Smith did stone and stucco work about the same time as Gideon was building homes. Willard Stubbs also worked with Nystrom. Beside the Orono'Town Hall and the Bederwood School, he did the pillars and gates, which were then in ftshkMi, at the Joseph Clu^rman place, east end of Fox Street, the stone gates at Brackett's Point, and Slone work for Dunwoodys and Carj^nters. One of the special things he built was the foot bridge on the George Draper Dayton Estate. Mr. Dayton promptly changed the name to Boulder Bridge Farm in li^t of the architectun^y marvelous boulcter foot bridge enhancing the entrance to the estate's private lagoon Smithtown Bay. (Willard Stubbs said. "Monroe Nystrom could look at a pile of and see whm each stone would fit in whatever he was working on.") (cont page 9)Ml t — Ncv>sk‘ttcr r \pnL m3 ■ » • T« •N __________Page ^ '-If** e 'T yj V 1 \ '. I irsi Mcnitirial I)a> Parade afler Wtirld War II. I-r : Kermit r.isingcr. Boh Thics. Hantid Gray. Bud Freund, Unknown, Fd Kramer, lX*an Neilstm. Ruswl Hodge. B<ib Neddermeyer. Fni/ Mi*n/. I t»ne l ake \koinan s Ouh at ik*dH'alutn al Unmn Oineiery, 1*>.W. Ixna Fhies Rrt>wn. Annie Diekey Hursh, Vic I iMiiger. Rov f rK‘>, MayiiK' 1 iaH'n Dickey. Mrs Jiv Variy. Ina Sherman Hursh. Mrs Agnes Hein/en. Lena I>ii|H>nt. Ma\me KolWen Thies « *• J 1 --------" 7%mm ^ m • » • • -V» .4 .A p' ■I-L.r. ■ t m- ■V>K - r'f ; r" :i- I, Anril. IQQ^Page 7 Memoria l Day at Lewis aad UniM Cemeteries by Marie Gorman Memorial was established as a national holiday on May 30,1868, so this would be the 125th annimsaiy. iMy honored the veterans of the War Between the States. Nowadays, at Union Cdnetery in Long Lake, we honor all who have been in the military service of our country and our own dec^sed friends and family member s The Memorial Day Parade begins at 8:45 am at the Pioneer Museum. The Hamel VFW will lead, followed by the Oroino High School Band, the Long Lake Fire Dept, and members of the community. The Cemetery Service begins at 9:15 am. At Lewis Cemetery, Maple Plain, the Memorial Service will be at 10:30 am at the cemetery. There will be a speaker, the Orono Band and veterans firing over the graves to honor those who have served in the armed forces. For a little history about Union Cemettry, here's what Charlotte Hursh Miller wrote about it; To the best of my knowledge, the first Long Lake Cemetery Association was formed in th early I900's. The cemetery, (ften called Tepee Hill” because the Indians often cooped there, had become somewhat overgrown and little cared for, so some progressive, work-minded women took it upon themselves to clean it up. t know Abby Wakefield, wife of Warren Wakefield, first president of our Old Settlers, was president and Ina Hursh, wtfe of John C. Hursh was secretory. My mother, Annie Dickey Hursh, was a diligent organizer and worker. Possibly Jessie Johnston, Jennie Campbell and Mary Sha^r were members beside others. Very likely Mrs. Russel and Amy Russel Walsh helped as they were much interesud and organized the Decoration Day exercises always held. Mr. Russel, infMl Civil War uniform, always rode a prancing horse and the exercises were ^Id in the Old Town Hall, then. With mortar board hats, a white dress with red, white and blue bunting, we girls (with dressed-up boys) marched to the cemetery where services were held at the Wak^td Plot *neath the ^treading maple tree. The flowers were all handpicked, mostly wild flowers, and a solemn procession placed some on each soldiePs grave. V Lewis Cemetery Memorial Day Service in the 1960‘s ' ar*i« ■j »■ Later, the Long Lake Women's Club took over much of the work. They hati Harley Courtney do tlu stone work and had the wrought-iron arch made. At this time, Rosie Clasen, wife of Jake Clasen, was president. Other members were Lena Brown, Annie Dickey Hursh, Vic Eisinger, Rose Fries, Mayme Clasen Dickey, Mrs. Joe Varty, Ina Sherman Hursh, Mrs. Agnes Heinzen, l^ena Dupont and Mayme Kohnen Thies." (coni, on page 8) .5! •*T 1 Newsletter #92 April. 1991 Pa&gb % Memori«l Day at Lewis and Union Cemeteries (continued from page 7) We have Mrs. Herman Noreen's account to give some early history on the Lewis Cemetery: "On Sept. 26,1891, the following citizens of Independence Township gathered at the Old Town Hall for the purpose of organizing the cemetery association: H. Jacobson, R. IV. Mills, A. Ingerson, E. Cleveland. F. Shrewsbury, O. Styner, Wm. Styner, D.F. Styner, J. Styner, C. Wasson, J. H. McGarry, J. Pagenkopf, H. L. Bracon, Robert Murray Jr. and W. C. Batdorf. The first business before the house was to select a name. It was agreed to choose Lewis as the name of the cemetery, because Lewis had given a plot of land to the township for a cemetery from his own claim. It went on record as articles of incorporation and filed in the office of Register of Deeds. Lewis was the first person to be burial there. Five Trustees were chosen for the association with O. Styner as president, IV. C. Batdorf as secretery. Trustees served one, two and three years, respectively. Lot owners herecfier were to elect officers. Lots were selling for $5.00 apiece. Single burials for $1.00. An annual meeting was held every year hereafter. The first year a fence was erected around the cemetery. The Treasurer was bonded. Sec'ys salary was J5.00 for the year's work. In 1897, the board paid $6.00 for maintenance. In 1899 new officers were elected. O. Styner re-elected, Julius Hardt elected Sec'y. This year lots reused to sell for: $25.00, full lot; $15.00,314 lot’ $10.00, H2 lot. Iron corner posts were purchased for $28 JO. 1905 found John Pagenkopg elected president of the association. New record books were purchased in 1908. All record re-copied. The Board then put the old books in strftey vault for strfe- keeping." _________ fI- f a b 7- Sarah Maiscr and Came Anderson modelled historic attire during a Pioneer Camp program. March Pioneer Camp ended with a visit by Paul Bunyan (aka Bob Gasch) who had a very, very interesting story about how the game of hockey was discovered, a lunch of buttermilk pancakes and sausage, and the final performance of our play. We have new programs ready for summer camp. Information on the dates and activities will be available in the Summer Program Brochures for the Community Education Departments of the Orono and Wayzata School Districts. Please call Liz at the Museum if you have any questions or have any ideas for future programs. Newsletter #92 April. 1*^9.^ The Orono Town Hall, Its Bui'ders and a Bit of Its llisforv (eommual irom paee > • ' V • ^ :•* J ¥>B t I!«• i. vij 1 •> t pm > 't^*C.-C'y X Two vicw.s of Boulder Bridge. One of the men in front of the bridge i.s believed to b*? Moiikx ; N> sln>m Sinee Gideon had worked with Nystrom, it w'as natural with ail the suine work to be done, that Gideon would ask him to come to Custer State Park. Nystrom laid up the field stone front for the l^ge in Custer State Park, where Gideon was in charge. Because the road vvas so narrow', Cecil Gideon had cut-down a Model V Ford pick-up to fit a narrow gauge to get up Iron Mountain Harney Pe.ik, according to Willard Stubbs, and Monroe Nystrom erected a stone look-out’ upon the top. It was dangerous and seemed like a mile drop off ”, wa.s Willard's comment when he saw it. I he two men respionsible for building Orono Town Hall went on to distinguish thcm.selves here and in South Dakota. V? Q» »•»»* Am 21 : Prl€«. >890: WitkiToft. SOOO. Electnc Vehicles fi -^■3 li- t Every Wciverley m 1^- \ 'T Owner Feels Just as This Woman Does I I T-agifl Newsletter #92 April. 1993 Pat»e 10 A Bit of (>rono History by Marie Gorman It all started in 1889, when Orono Township was formed. Its elected officials wea* three Supervisors, one acting as ^airman, a Clerk, a Treasurer, an Assessor, a Justice of the Peace, and a Constable. Later there arc sometimes two names for the last two offices and sometimes extra names on the Supervisor list. In 1949 the Supervisors are called Trustees. Tnis continues until 1955, when Orono berames a Village. As a village. Orono has a Mayor and four Trustees. The other Officials remain the same. In 1%2 some Officials are appointed instead of elected. An Attorney and an Engineer have been added. The Constable is replaced by the Chief of Police and the Assessor is also the Building Inspector. In 1964 we see that the Building Inspector is a separate Official and a Planning Commissioner shows up. In 1%7 a Park Commissioner has been added. In 1968 the Trustees are called Council Members. In 1973 there is a Zoning Administrator. In 1974 Orono changes into a City. In 1980-1981 a City Planner is listed. It is impossible to list the names of all who have held these offices in our newsletter, but those names that are known are listed in the Orono Centennial Book. The Orono Books are still availaUe at the Pioneer Museum. There are three monuments at the Old Town Hall. The first one honors those from the area who served our nation in the First World War and their names are listed. It was erected by the Women's Club in 1917-1918. The second one honors Dr. Newhall for his dedicated work and help to this community. This was put up in 1937. The third monument commemorates the 100th year of Orono. It was erected as p^ of the Centennial Celebration. Constructed prior to electricity and running water and first heated by logs in a pot-bellied stove, the Orono Town Hall is from another era. (There was still no running water in the building when the last council meeting was held in December 1992; you hud to get the key for the building next .i'vir.) It has outlived its time as a council chamber but sdll retains its quaint chami and historical si;^,n.t.cu«w . (Information and pictures for the Old Orono Town Hall articles courtesy of WHCPA archives, Orono Centennial Book, South Dakota State Historical Society, Marge Gasch, Bill Stubbs, Steven Kelley and ^b Ga^jL ___________ Work (Continues on Raffle Quilt Raffle tickets are now available for the WHCPA 1993 Raffle Quill, 'fhe pattern this year is called "Double 9-Patch", charming traditional quilt in navy blue and muted reds. The quilt top was put together in February at an all-day 'Piecing Bee' and the hand-quilting continues at the Museum. The quilt is scheduled to be raffled-off at the WHCPA Annual Meeting in August. If you would like to help, or want ticket infOTraadon, please call Cinda Dumas at 476-2256. Newsletter #92 April. 199^Hage 11 Archives Comer by Jim Roehl Notes from the Avery Stubbs Archives Memorial Library May 11 is Minnesou Day! 120 Years ago... April 29,1873 • Milo Stubbs wrote of being impressed w ith drumming grouse at Stubbs Bay. Mrs. Gertrude Hall recalls her father. Charles Grave, in the 1870's shix>ting partridge that hid in the grain fields at Stubbs Bay. 100 Years ago 1893.. .A financial Panic rocks the Nation. Gray's Bay dam is improved; original had been built in 1852. Stubbs Bay Bederwood School is built. This now restored at Murphy's Landing. 80 Years ago -1913... Electricity reaches Wa)^ta. It will cost you $3 for three months telephone rent. The Luce Line Railroad is being \ud from Minneapolis to Watertown. 50 Years ago • 1943 ... from Minnetonka Herald - Jan. 21- "Roger Stubbs received a wire infenning him of the safe arrival of his daughter. Cherry at Caracas, Venezuela, where she is employed at the US Embassy." May 24th - a fire destroys the clubhouse at Woodhill Country Club. Sgt. Hilton Beer, a paduaie of Wayzata High, is killed in action near Australia. 25 Years ago - 1968 .. .Hubert Hun^hrey loses Presidential election to Richard Nixon. Orono High School is dedicated and the Long Lake school is closed. Our society aquires the building (built 1917) soon after. Independence: We are furiously searching for artifacts of old Independence township, for our new satellite museum - the 1895 Town Hall. We have yet to find a good <4d photo of the hall. If you can assist with pictures, documents or memorabilia please contact Earl Taylor or another director. Keesling House: A Wayzata landmark may soon be lost. The 1880 home, just west of Redeemer Lutheran Church may be sold to a developer who wishes to put up a senior housing center. We hate to see it go, but there certainly is a need for affordable housing and it is a lovely location, there on the hill known as 'Piety Hill'. Benjamin F. Keesling and his wife Mary (Brunk) came to Wayzata in 1856 and for a time ran the Dudley Hotel. Benjamin served in the 11th Minnesota Regiment - Company G during the Civil War. Great-great grandson David Ice resides there presently. (See Sun-Sailor article of March 17). The Ice family is prtMninent in local history. Charles Ice, a native of Kentucky and his wife Permelia built a 2-story cabin overlooking Browns Bay. They would have been among the promoters of the ill-fated 'Rat Road', which was to connect the Watenown Road from Wayzata with the Brown Bay road(Hwy 15 today), dissecting lands that are today Wayzata Country Club and Woodhill Coimtry Qub;. The route was never finalized, however the railroad overpass is still visible from Hwy. 12 at the east border of Woodhill. Charles (II) Babb Ice was a blacksmith in Wayzata. Mike Ice (son of Joseph & Margaret Ann McDonnell) was in the the well drilling business. (See an article in March 17 Sun-Sailor.) YOU CAN HELP! Anyone interested in submitting to this section with history notes, meeting dates, preservation hints or whatever, we want to hear ftxxn you! Call Jim Roehl at the Museum Kitciien Aid We are in dire need of your un-used pots, pans, bread pans, mixing bowls, measuring cups, utensils, and what-have-you for our cooking projects. Please call Liz Olson at tlie Museum if you can donate. 1Newsletter #92 Mu«>um Hour« Thurs. morning 9-12 noon Sundays 2-5 pm Special Tours by App’t. Research: call Museum Thurs. Mornings Mu«aum Phona Numbara Ronccr Museum President, Jim Dillman Hist. Research. Jim Roehl Security, Bun Thies Editor, Marie Gorman Assoc. Editor, Roger Dumas CuratOT, Rena Stubbs Sp. Tours, Tom Tumham 473-6557 473-8924 473-8188 473-6936 473-2553 476-2256 473-5785 473-7592 photo at right: Tom Geelan and Anne Jung show students how the Abe Lincoln marionette works during a Pioneer Camp program. April. 1993 Page 12 % -I / Western Hennepin County Ploneen Association. Inc. I I F«H NOtD IW 1953 W. Wayzata Blvd, • P.O. B«ix 332 • Long Lake. MN 55356 NON-PRORT ORC US POSTAGE PAID PERMIT #30 LONG LAKE, MN •• • Western Hennepin County Pioneers Association, Inc. P.O. Bo* 332 Long Lake. MN 55356 (612) 473-6557 Yes, I am interested in the history of Western Hennepin County! Please set my annual membership dues at the indicated level:__Pioneer $5.00 _Tamarach $20.00 _Early Settler $50.00 _Homeateatfer $100.00 — Empire Builder $500.00 name. address cily. slate, zip, Xii .’?■ itfi ■M&HI \ -------- 1/1 Bonestroo Rdsene mr<|B AndCflikA Associates Engineers S Architects Orto G Wprtr^noc A » Pf • K'vny' C f't v!j»v»r t V>rvM Pf t Pf -,ienr< e C‘X*4 p£ f V»ve^s »[it?rr G k^uORhl PE SuV*r M Ete^fir C PA •>oiof Ccv'^uirjinf Hr^VWJ A Sgrikr:: P| A Ckm Kk P^ P f**r^*^ P£ a K*Atr P| D«»v*cJ O ur^yij* PE PtX'^ C tus»rt A A )r"i A ScHifilO' Pf A K.PtV'in P£ T 9*im»rn I Vtl « f ^ PE R ^f.^)e ‘S4vr C PI Thiim^ t Angu^ PE Pf A A P Pju Pf P*>Hi|^ / Py^ Pf M Pif'g AiCP ’f-Kvnjix a Pf C Pf t^rn^ Q Pf >T"v r> A*r/w»' Pf Xrrvirt^. P ArxJrrvjn Pf VUr% » ®C»PS PF Uir% A VV5 Pf C>a V A %• >'-»^ Pf fciJgrnur* P£ P hs Sthmn* Pf P^xtap j C*!Wf*«i Pf D A^trs Pf Miir' B ^vpn V PhJhp C vr» M*Pn L Are*ier G.KV D <r tfoht* Pf * T(xM Pf P 'app Pf IXxA^a^ J Berxxt Pf Sha^n D Ouitfafvxj Pf Cpf Ao Ojvip * Pf C^<P‘**N A frxkHV* LP<’ V Paww-iHy M Own F Engpei^fin IJNt »| Ifc-i " P€ ' I MEMORANDUM TO:Mr. John Gerhardson. Public Works Director FROM: Shawn D. Gustafson DATE: 5/6/93 couNcaMBim MAY 1 0 1993 enVOFMOM OM Crystal Bay Raa4 Trail The Orono City Council met with Public Works Director, John Gerhardson. and several representatives from the Orono Parks Commission and BonestnxY, Rosene. Anderlik and A.ssiKiatcs, Inc., on Wednesday, May 5.1993. The meeting was held to discuss the proposed pedcstrian/bicycle trail akmg the east side oi Old Crystal Bay Road from the Luce Line Trail to the Baker Park Reserve. The proposed location of the trail was set with stakes at several k>cations that were identified as sensitive areas. These areas have numerous trees that will be impacted or removed during the trail a>nstruction. The majority of the trees are small diameter (less than 4 inches) bi>x elder, willinv. or other non-specimen tree species. The trees are all located within the City right-of- way and are \olunteers" that were not planted, but grew up along the roadway ditches all by themselves. The proposed path will be kx:ated on a boulevard, four feet behind a curb line. The curb is proposed to control the street drainage. The curb is necessary due to the fact that the existing ditch will be filled to amstruct the trail. To maintain the ditches would require an additional 20 feet of right-of- way be acquired throughout the project. The trail would then be constructed along the east side of the ditch. This would move the trail closer to the residences along the road and would require additional project a>sts for acquisition of land. We discussed removing trees as necessary to construct the trail within the existing right-of-way. The trees would be replaced by Hennepin Parks from their large nursery stcK'k. The property owners could decide which of the available species is most desirable. These trees would then be kKated within the drainage and utility easement or on the residents’ property. The two areas specifically addressed during the meeting were on either side of Silver View Road and to the south of Watertown Road, on the Diekey property. Mrs. Dickey has been atntactcd and has agreed to grant the City casements to enable the construction of the trail along the east side of the trees. This kKation will save almtist every tree in that vicinity. The Council asked that the property owner kKated directly north of Watertown Road be contacted to determine the possibility of amstructing the trail along the cast side of the trees. The Council ended the meeting by asking that City Staff and consultants conduct an informational meeting with the residents along the project. 233S VMest Highway 36 • St. PauL MN 55113 • 612-63 -T.: - • • * atkb ill I'jaWK i - A ’ *r* 3 _ T H O 1 ■r. 5 ^ 55 *! Cl M E 5- T R O O C< S: S C« C 1 ii» T E S'- l/ll Bonestroo £ji Rosene SS Ander1ik& |\]| Associates lr»9ir»Mn * ArchJttctf o(*fi fi !%f tsnrt lA/ tevr^r. * I Vf V4M l^#iieri» %s.mf ^ <1^ r( l«virv*« I ^ » V tJ*» *«4 •f M I ii^As r f A *V««« A y'f^to ft U€T^ A H I MNit. W tf liMM U ^mrtf ( ilr «% A( K 4 %%aiiiiri. #f • «.vn^« M iNtt i#i( liaati.R H A««JPMm AIA C Mtwrl U«nr/. fC It rmo: Ajn^ M AiC-^ irr< t Miinti ff jp»*/ D P Mi^ A )f^Pf Z^4 w. li^irv n AAanta k*r»t I C4WM I PP is uii«^ ft t l^r K««n V T4M 0l«4||i1% I '^1 n UniVi«»' 5^ Cr«r» wimh in»U r.netr^jit April 21 1993 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 553Z3 coumuBiniBWwWliliB MHbl IHU Attn; Mr. John O*th»td,on APR 2 6 1993 CnYOFOMM Re: File No. 13946 ._ ., Old CnttU B*y Ro»d Trail Dear Joho: eTbid «t t'^lO-M A*M^ Sy of the pl»l» for the project (or your review end epprovai. The project 1* to be owettue^ »t per the fe^iHy ^ eenterliae. rrs ^ is =x with the exi»tinj paved trmil. and will be bid as in iltiTnate which can be added if desired by • y •nte rendwey Mctiot. .long County Rond 5 will be Improved with . paved .houlder .torn .ewer and A bituminous curb. The project schedule is proposed to be as follows: Approve Plans and Specifications Receive Bids Award Contract Street Construction Complete Construction April 26,1993 June 4,1993 June 14,1993 June 21,1993 September 17, 1993 Past 1-A rt S: S; O C: 1 A T e £=F" . G’ rms: M A)C^ T^rv: V/ ^«Tc»w C It«'^'. t ff £^f D jU*vw^ ^ Vwv*Mjr. <»f MAAlf t9#N. A«UAr A W>fpt Mm** fMrwt * AUfi te kT*»^ PW I C4\^ I f«'#i ' H I f i C: Viw^ » tuf ^*’ K««li ^ Til^k H ;) .'•I^^’ien yy Cr •• tAMrf C.‘»m\ A la<»^ tm>M i'.»»^AV fur*<4'^ *A t x-i«» /.cnr> I I OMatHIM APR 2 6 1993 EnVOFORONO Bay Road Trail project. Tnc 1993. We have enclosed h copy subsequent discussions with the loted 27 feet east of centerline. +97) where It will be moved to 0 to 87+00) where it will be 63 id 6 wiU be 33 to 45 feel north t trail will then be 27 feel north 411 meander northwest to tie in proved with concrete curb and Vatertown Road is an exception by the City. tb a paved shoulder storm .sewer April 26, 1993 June 4,1993 June 14,1993 June 21,1993 September 17, 1993 I* I S' ” na| 0^0 1 •K.i 3 I I r !l!l!I ! I ! I 1: 11 i! n i 2X3 20 t 1 ;1 c i f • iSft»1 M1{t i l!f 1 i J ! (ir J }* 9 — O > oz •0 I is ipf iI i 9> 6 I I 9 1 A * A I I I till I I f I I I ■ I • I I I I kV 9 > B e * « il '0 0 I I . . I 1• I I I I I wt 1 J/—A#—7/UIIBTlfl i7a j tili'lll 1 ■1 i H KK XX c? (/) > “D Z o “D > Or~o u m m ^ O 5 {/) 5 73 ?^ > p M r-1 Oi N3 I > O “U "Z.> o 5?D . > ^ -n -• § o 73 O 3 ^J9 O O K) 1 __ 70m > 5 > p > o H"n o o “n •••••• • •#»«••• • -»-«•«* «•* A • ••**• • ••••••• ► ^ • • » • • » « •M.W: imu touu 1003.11 ilW.19 • • • t » • « • • « • « » r • • » . »•*•«•»». looViir • » • 4 • . « 4 • 1010.00: • • • • 0 « • 0 . 10013.73 *••••••» lii' ■ • • • k « .*•*-«•••• ••**•••. . ***»»tr*i • 0 » ■ • * • • • •*»•«•»• » • • • 4 • » • . (03114 *•*••••*» iM0.» » • • » » 4 > • • * • » • 4 « . • « 4 0 • • • 4 t . • • •♦•■• k » • ioM.iii o o o 7) 5 7) o (OMJ4 iWTf 1020.U *»•*••••• O o 73 7i ----i l(OS.7t <I»1U (024.72 1024.95 «t»4.10 (024.95 1025.11 1. to».« X/ Ii\ >r § ;oo CY 4 ..•-0 »#0444«a« • ••4#444. • •aa#4«4 • • *0.04 4. • « «a^ • 4.* • 00. «4. •• • .•••4. at • 4.#.0* 44 ..••««0aa * 4 « -• * -*.* m ^idM-i# •••••*••« •«••••». • 0 0 0 • 0 a 0 0 i • »0004*44 a . • 4 a 0 * « * .•••••.•■ • ' • .4.4..#-. ,riTTr*r*TT* # . « • • :--------:.... :.-' •••••0404 • #••••*•♦ « •#00#00« 44440000a :::::::::• «••••••• •................. I02i4« • 000000a4 • ••••000a •••000000 • •••••00. • 4a.44.aa • •444«4.* *0*0449t. *44.04«.a • 44444 144 • ' :::::::::ta.4040*0 • *.4.*.4»* . * • .*-M**4*«.a. 0000«00.0 • ••••0000 0#000400a • «00#0000 •••••4444 • •*4.4.0. • •••44044 i4. ^ ^.^404^44'1 #4.44>..« • ••4«».#» 1 * * • *...«aa« .............. lixN.a^ «•«*••••• • ••••••.a «#••••••• «•••••••• • ••♦••••a • •000#00a 00040a000 • 00000000 • 0000000a • 00004000 000t#0000 •000«0000 • 000000a0 • «#0i400*«»««00^ 040044a00 • •0000400 000000000 • 00000000 • ••000000 • 0000000a 04000004a :00000000a 0000a0004 • 00«a0 • «••*•••*• #00400044 • ••.••4#4 • ••40444# • 440440a. • •*00.0.a • 004#0*4a • 40.# laa* ,«#0444444 • •••00004 • 00404404 4.444...* «4000*... 44044«0.. 44#4«»«a. 4 0 0 • « . « . • 004.44»4 • 0 0 4 • 4 4 . • • . 1 •#.#•••.. •..» «4*. ::::::::: *•0*0* >*. * M , 4 • . . • - ■ , • •••••••a• *•••••«« • ••**.a*a aa>»f«a»» • ••a«»aaa • ••000004 • 00#00a0« • ••04000 • • a 0 0 0 • a « • *444444a *..04a404 • ••••*00* • 40*4.440 • 4 0 . . • • . . 0 * 0 4 4 ... • 1 •..................]* 4 . . . , , • •••••••a • ••aa00a« 000a00a00 •#0000000 •00#00004 -0 0««* 04»«0«»-0 • 000#0004 • 40000000 ■ ••*00004 #0004a00l • 00004«0* #0000000. • ••000000 • 0400.00a • •«000400 • 4400#0a4 • 4004000a • •••a. 404 ' •0-1 0#4044440 4040*4444 • ••••••*0 • 4*044.40 • #444«040• •••.•••• • •••14440 «004#44.. 0444. • «• 4 4 4 a • • » 4 . 444.4 **0. 4 0 • 0 . . * . . 4040##«4r • •40.«.0.^.a.9.«.» •-*-* ...*.»«0a *.•*..0.4 • . 4 4 .... . • **••• « * w.*.^ » «•••••••• «»a««t40« • •*«••••• «*•«••••# • 4a««a««* • •0004000 • •••••004 00000000a • •••00000 • 0004000a 00000000a • 00000400 • •••••000 00444«4*4 • ••••••.0 • ••004000 • •0040040 • 00444400 • •4440000 0*0.*0440 • .•••••40 • 004.# •*• 40400.4a. • •04»44.4 • 4 0 4 4 . 4 . 4 00004444 • • •••••40*• •••«•.•»■ I 4 • 4 . . • 4 . . 4 . • ••••••••• *«••••••»•••*•«•« »•••••••• • •••00000 • 0t400000 • 000004a«• •••••••• • •••••••a • •••00000 • •••••••• • •••••000 • ••#00000 >•#<*•« «»«40 • 40040044 000000000 000«400*0 00044«0»* • 004000#* • •00444#4 • 4*400004 • •••••••0 ■»00 '01-0. * «• • A44. ^- 404* ».••• • 0 4 4 0 4 . » . • 0 4 4 4 * 4 « 1 -»#0« •-4 . *-01.04.0 . • » » 0 • - • . • • • •**4a*a* • •••••#00 • ••••••40 400000000 • •••••040 44044004* 4 0 0 0 0 a * 4 * • 04. .•«*• 4 0 4 4 4 • . . . 4 • 4 1 0 # • . * 1 ':i: :ni: •:. !.! " ! ! ‘ ............... ■ ••••••a* • t0«t«00a • ••••0t4a > • a a a • « * » • »««»a«ta •»••••••• a»«ta«a«0 ■ 00«aa«a0 a40«afl»a* »0aa«««aa ft*iaaa«aa »«a«00a«a • •»a«4aa« • «a4*aaaa • •••#••••• •••••••«• •••#•••• • ••••••40 • ••••••40 • ••••0004 * « a004*4«40att.«4»M • • 0 • 0 • • 4 • • •••••••a • ••••0000 • •0400400 • •••••0.0 • ••••••aa • ••••4000• •••••#«• • •••400.4 *< • • • •'A 0 • •••••400 004440I00 • ••••0000 • •4#04004 • ••••0I04• •••••••* ^»#0#*I0000I0|>>0 0*400t00 • ••••000# • 04a40040 • •••40040 • 40000040 • •••00044 • ••••0000 • •••••440 • 44040040 0 -0-0 «•• 40 • •••« « • « » 4 4 0 • * • 440.*|a« • 0 0 4 4 .. 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 • 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 . • • . • 00444.44 * .0.40^ « *00. • 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 • 0 0 0 4 4 4 « 0 • 00444444 400044.04 • 0 4 . « • • . • • 0444444. • 4 • • 0 • 1. •0- 1 • 0 I. :jam .aafta**.* .4a«44.4* • 44.40*.* ■ ** *•* 0*.**.* • ••0».*04 . 4 4 « 0 • * , , **»*.• *-0-*>. * i(o0.<a 9aaaaa0a« • aavaaaaa 0«a«a0aa • •a««aaaa »aa*«aa»a • ••0»a0aa ta«a4«aaa• • ••••••44 • •0000#44 • •••40044 404000044 ••••••••4 • ••••044#• ••••••## • •••••004 •••000044 • •••••4#4 040040040 • •••••••0 • •••••044 • •••••400 • •••••044 • ••400044 • 0 • 4 0 * 4 4 . 0 0# • 4 . • 4 « 400.44.. . • 0 0 4 4 0 » 4 4 • 0 4 4 4 4 • . • • 1. • •44.1. .4 -•«•••••» 440. .4*. * 4 •• 4 .... 0 .. i i i !! ! i • aa404a«a ■ ••••aa«a • a#a4a4aa • a 4 0 • a » • « aaa#0a0a» i00000aaa <0a00a»a0 •00000000 0«0> » **0i «a00^ • 000000^0 • ••400000 • ••0000#0 • •••••044 • •••••«40 0000004a4 • •••00044 • 00000040 • ••••••00 • •••44000 • •000440a 0#00#0004 • 4000000» • ••••4004 • •••••••0 • 1 0 0 * •• 4 0 000404400 ^ .0-• #•• 1 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 . r • 04.4.«». 400440044 • 0 . • 4 4 • 4 • ••-•*4 •••-*•• •>• • • 1 #-*-0*-**-4 0 0 • •4.44.4* * *-4 *•-***•ioMN «00000000 #00000400 #00000000 «0000a00a 000000000 000000000 00000000a 400000000 • ••••0000 • ••••4000 • ••••0004 • •••••aaa 000044000 • •••»0000 • ••••••0# 4 •••••••a • ••••••00 • 400»0040 40040.000 • 0 I 4 • 4 0 0 0 • 000#4000 • ••••40a0 040000000 • ••404000 • 04#0»440 • ••404000 4044444. • 4444»44*4 • •4404*.* 0 0 4 • 0 0 . 4 . 0 0 #. 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 . 0 0 ..* 0 4 4 . 4 . 4 • . : 1 ::::::::: • 4 . 0 • 4 4 . . •444.400s • 4 4 • 0 4 t ....••*0 • 00000004 #00000040 0.0000000 0000000# 400000000 #00000040 •0#0000#0 000000004 000040000 •0 4^«0«» ^ • ••440044 0404004a4 • ••••••04 000404*44 • 00040004 • 04040444 • •••44040 • ••••4040 404000000 • •••♦•••4 • •••••••0 • ••••••40 • •••00000 • •••00040 • ••••0.04 *.04a4400 ••^aa**-* ..«44«*44.*. 444*4..4. 04..44»0. 444«4»4.4 • 0.«4* .44 444.44.4* : ■: 4 0 4 . « . * , a . *...*.0a*.a*-0.0. ::::::::: 000000040 00400004» ••0000044 • •••••.•a ! 4 i i i i!!!............ 000000040 • 00000000 000000000 400000000 •00000000 400000000 0-#0»^*1##0i^ #00000004 #•0000004 • 0000 004 • 00000000 • •0000040 400000000 • 00000400 • 0000000 0. 00400#0 #> ^ 00004004a • 00#40044 4I0000004 • 40000040 • 00000000 • 00000000 • ••000004 *0^#*404»^»»^«W • ••••0404 000000000• ••••••«« 000044000 • 0004 004 • •0440*4< • 1000440a • •4404440 • •••••444 • •••••44* 00404 0400 »^^.^>40.»044^.4 4»4 •40000000 • ••••4444 • 04000000 • 04404044 • 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 • 4 4 • 0 40404004................. • 44 4444.4 004»4»40a *«•.*.• .04 . • 4444004. • •4.4.«., • 4 . . • . • . - • **.0 -*>-0-0 * • •0 * -• * 0.*-0 0 •> 0 . «•«..« tiai.u • ••••0000 • •0000400 000000000 • 00000000 • 00000000 000000000 • ••000040 • 04000400 400000000 • 44400004 • ••#44#40 • ••••••a0 • •••04000 • 0#004404 444004444 • ■ i ••••00000 000000000 #00000000 000000000 0 •.•. #a» • 0 00004000a • 0 0 0 4 0 4 . 000004004 • ••••. 404 40^ •• •••*• 0 • • • •••04404 44.a04400 • ••••0444 004«04004 • 0 Am#.* 044.4. ...• ••••••.. 0*000**0*. ; •: i:!:;;::::::::::: • • • ............ 00000000a • 0000004I 000400040 000000000 • •0000000 00000000t 000000400 • ••••0000 404000000 • ••000040 • •0000000 • •0000000 • 00400000 • 00000440 • 04400400 • ••400400 • •••••••4 • 04000040 • ••••••40 • ••••0040 044440000 • •#»44.«* • 44. 4.. 4* • 044044.. 0444444.. • ' ••0000000 • •0000004 0»« * W • ••004000 • 00404a40 • ♦••40440 • #••••000 • 4.4.444* 4. • . .• -.......................* . , ,1029.15 • 04000000 «00040000 • 00000000 000a00*40 • •••0#000 • «00004a4 • 00004444 • •••0004a • •••••4*4 • •0440444 • ••440000 404444000 044404040 • ••••••44 4#*44.4. ; j • • - « 4 . • • . ■ *- »* ** . • • •••••000 • ••••0000 • 00000000 00#0i 0»4 0i»40Ha00>< • 00000000 000000000 • •0000000 • 0000«000 0000S0400 • 00040000 • 04000000 0000004#0 000000440 00044a440 * ##^^4*404fc I00»a0. 000040040 • 0000I000 • •0000401 000000000 040404*44 044000000 • 0040104* il»40l»i||i»40lfca0a» 040440040 40*^#04»40. »40 4»i4« 440004000 • ••••0000 • 004#000t 040004044 • #4404040 i0404040# • ••440*00 • ••40a4aa 40..4444« »>»*.»4*44« * ■ ».*.4. • 444004< 4 *04044040 • 44004444 • 44004044 •04004444 • 44444404 • • »444044 444440444 • 04404444 40.*.»■ .440**404 444.a.0«a *-*.*•»*.**• ^ «, 00444#4*» -*.•>*♦•. *.0M044.'** .•••0.4 4 • ** *~ *-• « »4444«4.4 • •••••0,t 04000004a • •••00400 • 00000044 • ••000014 • ••04«404 • «a0044a4 • •••0aa»* • 444.044I 04044.40a • • 444000* • •4040404 • 044.0..4 444440. 0* #••.004.4 «44444 #40 «###44444 • 44400444 »4..444«0 • .•■* 0.*.a *-..».• «4«444.a. 4 0 4 • « « 00t040»44 • *•••4.44 04440040a • 4«.40.aa « ••4.4444 ♦ •.0».4*« *4*. *<.044 * 0 • • *..4* «.« X • Wayzata 1 — O »—^ L rC'—’ U.S. Hwy 12 ______ ______________ ^ O o ? 5 ::do >o K»yM p > A / OO i % i! 8? K 10W.M t03f.13 I0U.77 10MI2 I&M.34 i032.«i 034M or"o o to U»<*00 t021M tOVt.ST t01024 • • • • • < tOOS.IO 5 :c 9 O __O 3 • # • 4 • « 8 4 4 » * • « 4 • • 3 4 4 • « » • « 8 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 • 4 • 44 4 4 1 « 4 « 4 4 « i 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 rO M 4 4 4 4 4 •■ 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 ^••^41 4*4 • 4 • • 4 4 4 t • 4 • 4 4 4 • • 4 * 4 4 4 4 4 • • 4 ♦ 4 4 •>«•*« 4 4 4 4 4 4 f 4*4 4*4 • « 4 • CD (II ■V;:: 94K ................■ ••••♦»•• ; • U -- ‘ k • • • • .• • • ♦ •«»« :: ::: **. . ■ i ^; i!;::i ! i !! I.’ ! !. , ; • 1 ♦ - • * 4 4 ............i ! .• • . - ! . ::::::;•■ - •- ♦ »■ «.«. • », • ‘ »•*•••. , .::::;::::■ • i i 1'!!!!• • :::::::::♦ . j I;!!;: *. . . 1 • • ! . 1 ' • ' o i:: • • • •* I I!! .., «4' 4 ^ X 1! I! i! I ^ I! f • • • • 11 i t i i:•••<«•«•*11 ID TT?T7T“'*y.' • • I!! t! *.;!!! * rrrtTrr*♦ *• • ‘/ X m! *.!***•«•••III!’.!!;!!. * I -!! i!.!! 1 4 • 1. •»!! !; • CD • » •»»-••• *«••••••»• I i ’! 4 ?;!!;. . ! i m‘.i ) . , •........ * • ••*•••••♦ i; • ««»•••« •^ • • §•••** • • • • • 4 • • «j ■Torosr ••••• «•••••«• • 4 •»•••• » • $ f *##••••««• ••« ••••«• ^ ••••••«#« 4*4«4t4a« ; ; ;■ 01 • ••*•« • 1 « 4 «§•••• - . . • • « • • • • ««•«•»••4 4 k »••••• 4 • • j ; CD ««••••«•#4 • 4 « 4 • • * • * 4 »4»t««444 4 ■»«< ••«44»44#4 • 4 • ............*• • ■ 11 • 4 < •4B4* .4 iiy.y.iy.! 1 i • • • • 4 ■ • 4 • • 4 • [• ••4I4«»« • 4 « • ••••»»•«*4**44444 • • * • « 4 « • •::: • ••••*»••• •444444« 444*4444»• 4 4 44444A444 444444444 4 4 4 • « • • • • 4B4444444 4«444#444 4 4 • oc • ••«#«•«*••444444# ^4X4-». • 4 4«•«•••••• •44444444 i! I »••«••••• • 4444«44#:::• • • • • • •444444«44................. 9-9 9 «*•••••••• 444.44#a 1 1 1 • ••I.***.***«•••••4 4 4 4 • 4 4 « 4 4 4 4 i *I! 111!!• • 4 i! i i i i:::1 i i M • 4.#«44#44 • 9m ■ ...............................4 • * •• • « 1*.!!!!*!***I!; III!?!!;:♦ * :: 1 ht !::::::' • • 1 1 p <•*•«••••«........1! i I j 1 !-* ••4«4444a ‘ « 4* >4 • »«4« #• <4 . « « .■ 1 i- ii « 444444«4 • •44«4««4 • 1 ••4««444» •••4*«a.a • 1 1 . /M' I (0^144 1444 4) 1424.44 142)4) JWl.T# J1H4.14 1614.42 16D.46 161444 16o>.s1 1665.61 1062.46 : 1666^2 UU O (/) > zo I m pD0)80^bH 1J490 D0 en^MNOUS cuw 8 • • «.« • « m- ^^ • «•••• *•« -» • • • « • >IKM!«jijQ4do ♦ • t ♦• « • • • * • ft • ft 4 ft • ft * » ft ft • • ft ft 4 « •*««ftii*.ft««.fli4 ft ft ft ft ft « • • «*« »# » I • ft • ft ft «N».t1 Mi.74 H7.67 •M.00 Mi.QQ tM.OO ■ ' fM.M MAoo tM.OO •MOO •M m M7.00 H1.90 ; . __M.OO ^Ui : M7.00 ntM -wtif ■-: JM.n <06006 idol.db : : J003.47 100S.3t ; ; jooo.i7 <067.ii - <067.04 ^ ^ <00676 J(I6*.64 j<»6.« <6<6.4i r — I6l2.«i _ioio.55 • • ’ • » ft • t t •4.. oo 1 o (/) > ft X 2 o U) X m TO: FROM: DATE: Mayer and City Council Ron .'.oorse, City Administrator May 5, 1993 IMOLMEEnilG MAY 1 0 19S3 OTYOFORONO SX7BJECT: Stubbs Bay Assessment Appeal Settlements Balgaard, and Greg Ehalt Charles Based on direction from Council, staff has settled the two remaining Stubbs Bay sewer project assessment appeals. The two property o%mers involved are; Charles Balgaard, 3435 Eastlake Street and Greg Ehalt, 105 Cygnet Place. The original assessment amount for Charles Balgaard was $8,840.00, the appeal has been settled at $7,000.00. The original assessment amount for Greg Ehalt was $18,880.00, the appeal was settled at $14,000.00. The attached resolutions reflect the reduced assessments amounts. Council Action Requested. Motion to adopt the attached resolutions reflecting the assessment appeal settlements for Charles Balgaard and Gregg Ehalt. A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL - REDUCTION OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3435 EASTLAKE STREET WHEREAS, on July 27, 1992 the Orono City Council adopted Resolution #3145 to adopt the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Assessment Roll; and WHEREAS, Charles Balgaard is owner of the property located at 3435 Eastlake Street legally described as the West 50’ of the East 200 ’ of Lot 2. Block 8, Bayside Addition to I^^<* Minnetonka; also described as PINS 05-117-23-13-0039 (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the assessment roll adopted in Resolution #3145 set the principal amount of the assessment for the property at $8,840.(X); and WHEREAS, Mr. Balgaard formally appealed the amount of the assessment per the legally prescribed method; and WHEREAS, Mr. Balgaard claimed that the value of his property will not increase by the amount of the assessment as a result of the installation of municipal sewers, and WHEREAS, the taxable market value of the property for 1992 was $27,600.00; and WHEREAS, the City and Mr. Balgaard have agreed that an w^sessment in the amount of $7,000.00 is appropriate. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Shibbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Assessment Roll is hereby amended to revise the principal assessment for the property from $8,840.00 to $7,000.00. Page 1 of 2 Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of May, 1993 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May 1993 by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor Sc City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument v/as executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public 1 ..Vj Page 2 of 2 A RESOLirriON TO AMEND THE STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL - REDUCTION OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 85 CYGNET PLACE WHEREAS, on July 27,1992 the Orono City Council adopted Resolution #3145 to adopt the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Assessment Roll; and WHEREAS, Gregory J. Ehalt is owner of the property legally described as Lot 3, Block 1, Swan Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; also described as PINS 04-117- 23-22-0009 (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the assessment roll adopted in Resolution #3145 set the principal amount of the assessment for the property at $18,880.00; and WHEREAS, the property is a vacant lot located adjacent to and owned in common with Mr. Ehalt's homestead property at 105 Cygnet Place; and WHEREAS, Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B), states "the separation by the transfer or sale of non-conforming undeveloped lots not served by public sanitary sewer, aligned in a contiguous arrangement, undivided by public or private road or road easement and under same or common ownership is not permitted without Council approval"; and WHEREAS, adherence to said Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) has in the past resulted in City Council denial of buildability of substandard (non-conforming) common ownership lots in the unsewered zone; and WHEREAS, the property is l.l acre in area in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District which requires a minimum lot size of 2.0 acres, and the property prior to the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project was not served with municipal sewer, and therefore was subject to Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B); and Page 1 of 3 t WHEREASt without municipal sewer, the lot was considered by the City as not buildable, and provision of municipal sewer service to the property would most likely result in the lot becoming buildable with only a lot area variance required; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ehalt formally appealed the assessment amount through the legally prescribed method, claiming that the lot is similar in size and character with other developed lots in the neighborhood and that the City I^IwCly would have granted the necessary variances as it had in the past for other substandard lots in the neighborhood, if Mr. Ehalt had made such an application to the City in the and WHEREAS, Mr. Ehalt further claimed that as a result of sewer availability the property would not gain $18,880.00 in value; and WHEREAS, the City and Mr. Ehalt agreed that a reduction of the assessment to $14,000.00 would be acceptable. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Assessment Roll is hereby amended to revise the principal assessment amount from $18,880.00 to $14,000.00. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of May, 1993 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor 4' Page 2 of 3 t i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a MinnesoU municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ’ Notary Public ,■1 Page 3 of 3 -‘V fe- > I. //.io. TO I FROMt DATIi SOBJICTi Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator /j May 5, 1993 Planning Commission Appointments COUNCaMBIM MAY 1 0 1993 OlYflF The Council has completed interviews with the Planning Commission applicants. The Council may at this time make the appointments to the Planning Commission. Because all current Planning Commission terms are one year terms both the current members and the new members will be appointed for terms of one, two or three years in order to provide for staggered terms. Council Action Reguested. Motion to make appointments to the following Planning Commission terms. 1. ?. 3. 4. 5. 6. One year term expiring March 31, 1994. One year term expiring March 31, 1994. Two year term expiring March 31, 1995. Two year term expiring March 31, 1995. Three year term expiring March 31, 1996. Three year term expiring March 31, 1996. i >1 ii‘ r '■* iisnii r • TOi PRGNs OATIt Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 10, 1993 SUBJICTx Amendment to Volxinteer Commission Ordinance The underlined language in the attached ordinance reflects items discussed at the April 29 Council work session. This language or other language as directed by Council can be formalized into an ordinance amendment for the May 24th meeting. f' Ss»'s i .V "ji- SEC. 2.50. BOARDS AMD COMMISSIONS GENERALLY. All Board and Commission appointments authorized by ordinance shall be made by the Council at the first regular meeting in January of each year unless another appointment date is established elsewhere in ordinance. The term of each appointee shall be established and stated at the time of his appointment, and terms of present Board and Commission members may be re-established and changed so as to give effect to this Section. New appointees shall assume office immediately. Provided, however, that all appointees to Boards and Commissions shall hold office until their successor is appointed and qualified. All vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as for an expired term, but the appointment shall be only for the unexpired term. No appointed Board or Commission member shall be an employee of the City, but an ex officio member may be so employed. All appointed Board and Commission members shall serve without renumeration, but may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of their duties when such expenses have been authorized by the Council before they were incurred. Tn order to balance the need for consistency, with the dftgire to provide ongoing opportunities for new members; the Council, in genera1. will reappoint commission members for one “k ygar term bevond their initial 3 year term. Any Board or Commission member may be removed by the Council for any reason and his position filled as any other vacancy. Each Board and Commission shall hold its regular meetings at a time established and approved by the Council. Boards and Commissions created by resolution shall terminate when the purpose for which they were ci^eated has been accomplished or upon the expiration of their terms stated in the resolution. Except as otherwise provxded, this Section shall apply to all Boards and Commissions. SBC. 2.51. PLAMNIMO CONMlbSlOM. iii. V Subd. 1. Establishment and Composition. A planning Commission composed of seven members, who serve staggered 3 years \ terms Is hereby established. In order to make the transition from the current one year terms to staggered three year terms._Slhft initial appointments mav be for one or two year terms. As future three year appointments are made, the terms will then be staggered. The period of these terms is for 1 April to 31 March and shall be appointed by the 2nd business meeting March. It is the policy of the Council to appoint persons to the Planning Commission as follows: Two of the members shall reside in and be appointed to represent the Rural Service Area of the City as defined in the Comprehensive Management Plan, two members residing in and appointed to represent the Urban Service Area, one appointed that resides on Lake Minnetonka lakeshore property and two shall be appointed to represent the City At Large. The Council by majority vote may deviate from this policy to appoint persons without specific designation. The Zoning Administrator and one Council member shall be members of the Commission ex officio and without vote. Subd. 2. Powers and Duties. The Plauming Commission shall be the Planning Agency of the City and be an advisory body to Council. The Commission shall have the power, under the direction of the Council, to carry on the duties set forth in Minnesota Statutes, and those duties provided by this Code and such ng prescribed by the Council from time to time. The Commission shall hold a regular meeting once each month and keep records of its proceedings. 4 J f. TO; FROM: Ron Moorse. City Administrator John Gerhardson. Public Worits Director DATE:May 6. 1993 SUBJECT: Lease Agreement - Crystal Bay Post Office nmaLum may 1 0 1993 CnYOFORONO Recently the Council re(]uested additicnal information regarding a lease agreement with the U.S. Postal Service for the Crystal Bay Post Office. The following is a list of postal facilities and their rates; Amiandale Clearwater Cokalo Darwin Delano Hamberg Hamel KimbaU Loretto Mayer Montrose Crystal Bay So. Feet 2154 1068 2000 457 2230 1068 2320 1392 1035 1143 1404 914 Per Year Amount $3420 $7445 $7620 $1920 $3560 $6000 $8278 $5663 $6336 $4200 $8245 $5400 Cost Per So. Foot $1.59 $6.97 $3.81 $4.20 $1.60 $5.62 $3.57 $4.07 $6.12 $3.67 $5.87 $5.91 The average of the irix>ve is $4.42 per square f<i ik •j.; COUNCIL h r ■ s TOt Mayor and City Council MAY 1 0 199J FROMt Ron Moorse, City Administrator CnYOFMOM OJLTIt May 5, 1993 SUBJlCTt i^pointments to the North Coalition Tonka Crime Prevention The current City of Orono representatives on the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition are Barbara Peterson and Steve Sullivan, Police Chief. Both of their terms expire on May 9, 1993. Co\incil may at this time appoint Steve Sullivan to a further term on the Coalition. If the Council wants to reappoint Barbara Peter^n to the Coalition, staff will contact her to determine if she is interested in continuing to serve. Otherwise the Council may want to make a new appointment to the Coalition. -4 »• TOi ^ FRONi DATIt SUBJECTt tmoLmm MAY 1 0 1993 OIVOFORONOMayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 5, 1993 Establishment of Work Session to Review County Road 15 Safety Improvements Concept Plan Representatives of the County Transportation Department have requested an opportunity to meet with the Council to discuss the concept plan for County Road If safety improvements. It may work best to schedule a work session to review and discuss the concept plan. CMMOIMBniS TO: Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM: John Gerhardson. Public Works Director MAY 1 0 1993 DATE:May 6, 1993 SUBJECT: T^kg Access Monitoring - Department of Naniral Resources Recently the City of Orono received a request from the Department of Natural Resources to conduct a monitoring program for inspection of watercraft for Eurasioan Water Milfoil, Zebra Musseb, etc. at a City boat launch area. The biwt ifnnrh area is the access off Loma Linda onto North Arm Bay. The amount of rime for monitArit^ will depend on the amount of activity at the access. However, in order for them to conduct the program, they need a permit from the City. 1 have attached the pertinent information regarding this program * '• .< RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMIT 1. DEFlNrnONS: The following definitions apply to the temns used in this document: DNR means Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. AGENCY means the represented unit of government including but not limited to municipality, city, township, county and federal agencies, including but not limited to National Park Service, U. S. Forest Service, US. Fteh and Wildlife Service and Army Corps of Engineers. EXOTIC SPECIES MONITORING means inspection of watercraft for harmful exoHc species, ensuring that public water accesses are weed and debris free while monitoring teams ar^resent, verbal communication of the laws and issues surrounding the existence, spread and enects of exotic spedes to Minnesota's waters, distribution of written materials and exotic alert tags, collection of information and data necessary to evaluate: the spread of exotic spedes, the effect of public awareiwss, the response of recreational watercraft users to tne pro|ect, and other pertinent research information. PUBLIC WATER ACCESS means any public area designated for the primary purpose of bunching m • ^ ^ * ________^ ______a ^ _ _____^_____and exiting watercraft to an adjacent b(xiy of water 2. PERMISSION TO ENTER: The gives permission to enter and occupy, for the purpose (FMimlAtMcy. County, MynldpaHtv.Towiiihlp) of Exotic Spedes Monitoring, all public water accesses administered by the above agency and ad|acent to waters identified DNR as being conbminated tvith exotic wedes. I^IR may exerdse this permission through its employees and authorized volunteers. DNR may not transfer or assign this permission except as authorized by the Commissioner of Natural Resources. This permit shall remain in force as long as Minnesota Sbtutes Section 18.317 requires [MR to conduct exotic species monitoring. The DNR shall act with due care while on the property of the above agency and the DNR and its employees and agents shall be responsible for damages to the extent authorized and limited by Minnesob Sbtutes Section 3.736. The above agen^ reserves the right to revoke this permission upon notification to the Exotic Species Program of me DNR. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY TITLE:TITLE: Director, Division of Fish Wildlife DATE:DATE: AfmyCopy April 1.1993 r Jim Au RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMIT l.DEFINm<WS: »he following definitions apply to the terms used in this document: DNR means Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. . . , » AGENCY means the represented unit of government including but not limited to municipality, city, township (oAarai AimtwtM inriudinff but not limited to National Park Service, U. S. r means me lepresemea unu wi ^wyiniun^n* .w ••— >, county and federal agencies, including but not limited to National Park Service, U. 5. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Army Corps of En^neers. EXOTIC SPECIES MONITORING means inspection of watercraft for harmful exotic sped^ensunng to Minnesota's waters, distribution of ivritten materials and exotic alert tags, collectton of information and data necessaiy to evaluate: the spread of exotic species, the effect of pubiM wareness, the response of recreational watercraft users to the project, and other pertinent research infor^tion. PUBLIC WATER ACCESS means any public area desigiuted for the primary purpose of launching and exidiig watercraft to an adjacent body of water. 2. PERMISSION TO ENTER: •1110 ______________________gives permission to enter and occupy, for the purpose of Exotic Monitoring, all public water ao^^^dministered by MmdsSon trough its empkr- rei authorized volunteers. CWR may not transfer or areign this pmiission except as authorizW by the Commissioner of Natural Resources. This permit shall remain in force as long as Minnesota Statutes Section 18.317 requires WR to conduct exotic sp^es monitoring• The DNR shall act %vith due care while on the property of tne above agency and the emplo)^ and agents shall be responsible for damages to the extent authorized and limited by Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736. iMficy reserves the right to revoke this permission upon notification to the Exotic Species Ore DNR. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY BY:.BY: TITLE:TITLE: / Director, Division of Fish 8c Wildlife DATE;DATE: DNRConr April 1.1993 \ STATf OF •^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA • 55155-40 - ONR INFORMATION (412) 2f441S7 April I, 1993 APR e ^ MikeGaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orino P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bqr, MN 55323 SUBJECT: INSPECTING WATERCRAFT FOR EXOTIC SPECIES tbe Department of Natural Resources in its efforts in combating harmAil exotic species. We have been by the legislature to conduct random inspections of watercraft leaving waterbodies that contain harmful exotic species such as Eurasian watermilfoil and zebra mussels. -t Minnesota Statute 18.317, Subdivision 3a. s*-^, 'Licensed watercnfi and association equipment 4ese species ftSn^ing transported to other lakes or rivers m your community and acrou the state. iMislative i 1 wsources of Fish and WUdlifo and Minnesott Conservation Corps. Because voiir acencv is die managing authority of a public water access on a oooy oi waiw uw ey exoiic species Please have a ccpieseniative of your agency sign the attached two copies of die Right of Entry Permit and return one copy to the address listed below as soon m possible. Minnesota Department of Nttural Resources Exotic Species Monitoring Program 500 Lafwelte Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4025 Your cooperation is gready i^reciated in helping to preserve and enhance one of Minnesou’s resources... its water. If you have any questions, please contact me at (612) 297-4891. Sincerely, ^ Thomas E. Hagel, Coordinator Exotic SpeciesMonitoriim Program Minnesota Cfonservation Corps (t natural AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER .*Q22!srni*. M r „ kimnim n uiNM litmnt T'j' ; 1 L(. f- I rr rfe IIt EXOTIC SPECIES MONITORING TEAM FACTS c«in««fnation CQfPt (MCCl: Th* ini^viduait worliing at Exotic SptciM Monitors (E.S.M.) ara hirad undar MCC authority which raquiraa that paraona working muat ba batwaan tha agaa of 18-26 whan hirad. ba a Minnaaota rasidant. and unainployad or undar-ampioyad. ftanlot Tha orimary goala of tha Exotic Spaciaa Monitoring Taam ara: (1) to incraaaa public awaranaaa about tha thraata of axotic spaciaa to Minnaaota'a watara (2) to damonatrata what individuais can do to pravant tha spraad of axotic spaciaa. Tha awaranaaa procasa invoivaa tha following dunaa: • Inapaction of watarcraft for harmful axotic spaciaa • Varbal communication of tha laws and isauas surrounding tha axiatanca. spraad and affbeta of axotica spaciaa to Minnaaota'a watara. • Distribution of writtan matariala and *CvotH: AlarT tags. • Raeording and documanting information and data nacaasary to avaluala; tha tptaad of axotic spaciaa. tha progratn of control maaauraa. tha affact of public awaranaaa. tha raaponaa of racmationai watarcraft uaara to tha projact. and othar partinant raaaareh information. • Forwarding boatar*a tachnical inquiriaa to DNR apaciaUata • Ensuring that Public Watar Aecassaa ara waad and dabria ffaa whila monitoring crawa ara praaant. and Whan: lyiQHilOfifig Tmiti Consist! of on# coordinstor sod Isn Minnosots Consoivsilwi Cocps Ex Monitors Ircatad in lha tallowing aiaas. Metro Araa • 6 Monitors, Ouluta Araa - 2 ___ ____ C^^a m 7. MOflttOrS. IViynilUrv II mi -------------------------- MonHofS. and South East Araa along tha Missisaippi Rhrar - 2 Monitors. Monitors will: • Concantrala on boatar contact at high usa lakaa and rivars. • Monitor only infastad lakes. • Monitor only infastad rivars and potentially high fish rivars (St. Louis. Mississippi. Minnaaota. St Croix) . Concantrala efforts only at Public Walar Aecass aa tttal tothacooparativa RIGHT OF ENIRT AGREEMENT wWeh Indudsa tadaral, county, and locally maintalnad PubHc Walar Aeoaaaas in addition to ONR and DOT Public Walar Accissas • Monitors will NOT conduct Inspactlona or distritaulo matortalo oulsido of their assignad Public Water Aecass aa. idantifleation of tha Exotic Spacias Monitoring Taam: • 18* X 24* Yellow A Mark Sign ONR EXOTIC SPiafS INSPECTION of shirt and a DNRAICC baM cap _ ____ • Exotic Spacias Monitors wW not ba driving an idantmad DHH uanicia. Eiirie"*^iM'^itora have mobile phones tar amarganclaajo communicata with tha monitoring coordinator. ONR Conservation Officars. or other paaca ofltears. AT TACNNEIT 1Adiinlstrator >LIST OF PUBLIC MATE* ACCESSES NNOm - RECFAC Dat« B«m - Prlntal OA/Ol/IBBIPImm Mkt vrlta-tn cKangt* on tht accMt list btlow to htip us update our rocords;HUw Beffroiitest PlMMlng A Zoning Adsin City of Oreno • P 0 Bok 66 Cmtol Bov m SSSZS (BIZ) 473-hs7 {: isr?»'2s: rtn;'-«•'V '■BOTE: "Reap Typo" Is either "cerry-ln" or the surface type of a trallerable ra^>Fietltty Imp:Owied or Control1«d Acres:Open>Clesed Status:Oata Roleasaabitity: (for public info)Water Body Raaa:Lake 10# or River Nile:PublicAccess Raap Type:N'TOKA PW ACC. SITE IB .00 * aOSEO TO PUBLIC ** NOT RELEASCABIE *NINNETOIKA Z70133 earth i Access location:OffioeParkingOntoUm:Snsces:Tup Rng Sec Forty Info:(east)0 117 Z3w OB SW/W OS/IO/BS tm« t| -I I • i ■?<1 'ii . # ■4 -.V■ -V^': .'4 . •V: '■H ' *1- ...“z ^,•‘4 ■ .:i£.v,w*j‘s r '■ ■« 4 ' '•* L /: Ji' 0. 4 'K i ■ .•h>-- - ^ i V ■ ■' z r- i TOt ntOMs DATES COUNOlIKnM Mayor and City Council MAY 1 0 1993 Ron Moorse, City Administrator OITOfOlOB® May 5, 1993 SUMFEGTs Request for Payment No. 2 City Facilities Furniture - General Office Products The initial payment request for General Office Products reflected a 10% retainage to provide the City with a period of time during which the City could use the furniture to ensure it was all in working order. The retainage amount and amounts from subsequent invoices are now released fur payment. The total amount to be paid is $15,117.75. This amount is within the amount budgeted for furniture in the facilities budget. -t COUliaiMBIM To: Fro Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator MAY 1 0 1993 cnYOFonno Date: Subject: May 7. 1993 Continuation of Goose Capture and Translocation Program In 1989 the City agreed to pay a portion of the costs of a goose capture and translocation program in the Pheasant Lawn area for a four-year period ending in 1992. At the Cmincil at which the final year of the program was discussed, the Pheasant Lawn residents that the program should be ongoing beyond 1992. The residents are now requesting that the City continue to assist in the funding of the program. The cost of the program is $1,000 per year. The City’s share has been $200 per year. The Pheasant Lawn Homeowners Association pays the remainder. The program has been effective in controlling the goose popi^tion in the area. Inl992 it was repotted that the goose population had dropped from approximately 300 to 60. Although the City’s cost for this program is small, the program does serve only one area of the City. The Council can expect that if it agrees to contmue to ^ the program for the Pheasant Lawn area it may receive requests from other areas of the CiQ^ for funding of similar programs. . 1 k 1 1 'V ?.h-- kr b;f b E: - • i K • \ TO: mOM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John Gernaidson. Public Works Director coananw MAY 1 0 1993 OTYOFOMM DATE:May 7, 1993 SUBJECT: Temporary Employment Parks • Tim Hultman Each year it is necessary to employ temporary people to maintain parks After review of the applications received, it is recommended to employ Tim Kultman of I as a Temporary Parks Helper at an hourly rate of $6.00, effective May 12, 1993. This position will terminate no later than six months after starting employment. I r • TO: FROM: Ron Moorse, City Administrator j John Gerhardson. Public Works Director tMOUBIMB May 1 0 1993 CfTYOFOSOM DATE:May 7, 1993 SUBJECT: Temporary Employment Parks - David May p^h year it is necessary to employ ten^wraiy people to maintain parks. After review of tlw applications received, it is recommended to employ David May of Hamel as a Temporary Parks Helper at an houriy rate of $6.00, effective May 12, 1993. This position will terminate no later than six mTsjikihs after starting employment. r A 1 1 i .Ji E’l. k I r :V y K-'.. /,‘f muniiii LIST OF LZCSNSBS FOR COONCZL APPROVAL MAY 1 0 1993 FOR KBBTZNO OF MAY 10, 1993 CnVOFOHM Special Event Permit - American Heart Association MN Affiliate World Cycle & Fitness Bike Ride June 5, 1993, 9 a.m.•2:30 p.m. Garbage & Refuse Collector's License Westonka Sanitation 3146 Island View Drive Mound Woodlake Sanitary Service Inc 9813 Flying Cloud Dr Eden Prairie Septic System Installer - Barfknecht Excavating 9201 County Road 26 Maple Plain i 1 •! .'T 11 t i i •: i:_ _J i. h Data: To: From: Subject: May 4, 1993 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police 4 Bicycle Race j li£ive reviewed the application for a proposed bicycle race sponsored by the American Heart Association and World Cycle and Fitness. As this is the first year this organization has sponsored the event, we have no previous experience with them. I have ^•viewed the route to be taken and I see no reason to decline issuance of this permit. 1 I i 1 i.l' PerTnit #:• SPECIALE^S PEPMl* APPLICATION : $50«00 orc-ni2ation(s) Handling the ’Sventi ^mOtP—tim£. Ll)o<AA C\^rA^ ^ «. , •«. I m \ /r'*' Date of Event . Jc oaf.A.Hours of Event; Reason or Purpose: Insurance Company; MivsKi McLtty^wan , f_ '..„il_T.t-Ton ~Copy of insurance certificates to oe suomitted with this application. I am aware of all applicable State and other laws *•9**'“",^! “f special events and will abide by same. 1 ‘J'afrJItSy l5M”ir‘a“e 'oTsp^iat'StUfwrS^^^^^ “"tSS "anting of this permit. Approved: Remarks Denied:By: < I- .•i:r f. 1 i’ cinr adm"’^ i «."f &S‘! * t • • APR 2 6 1093 R£CEifiT-mmH270820 cool Mi TW 04/26/ V. ■••V t£ fS wLm -. V -••JL. •A '\v • i I nr I IrOHaNgJ CITYof OROIVO Post Offios Box 66«Cryatai Bay. Minasaou 55323 •Moaidpal On tne North Short of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACT ADVISORY In aceordane* with M.S. 13.04, Sabd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data*, we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your ijujiXification for the permit or license requested* 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or f«d«ral agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4, If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. Firs tJc Last IV. 77'^ Mdress City' State Zip Phone rights as stated above. \JP •UaOINC a ZONING - 473«73S7 ASSISSfNG AOMINimAnON a finance - 473.73SS PUEUC twOEKS • 473*73Sf LONG RIDEStart fiom Wayzau Junior High School in W^ta. Ride west on Wayzata Blvd to Fetndale. Ride fonlh on Fctndale aentos counQr road 15 to RussdL Ride north on Russdl to Didunsoa Ride west on DIdcenson to Orono Oiehard Road. Ride south on Ofono Ofchaid Road to Fox. Ride west on Fox to Bayside Road^). Ride west on 84 to oou^ road 19. Ride sooth on 19 to 151. Ride west on 151 ediieh turns into 110. Ride west on 110 to 26. Ride west on 26 to 92. Ride south on 92 to 15. Ride west on 15 to 10. Ride south on 10 to 30. Ride west on 30 w4iich turns into 25. Ride north on 25 to 10. Ride cast on 10 to 20 east Ride east on 20 to 6. Ride cast on 6 to oouimr toad 19. Ride north on 19 to counQr road 24. Ride cast on 24 to Hunter. Ride sooth on Hunter to 6. Ride east on 6 to Femdale. Ride south on Femdale to Wayzata Blvd. Ride east on Wayzata Blvd to school CITY‘OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 License Year Date Received Fee Paid -1- ' -1 Initials V \ • GARBAGE t REFUSE COLLECTOR’S LICENSE APPLICATION Ttie undersi9ned wishes to operate the indicated business in th0'^ity of Orono ano herewith makes application for a license to do 0 Business/Fim j- -'TtriD- -2=^ Address ^.<Street) y (City)(State).(Zip Code) Business Phone Numter ^ _ _ _ _ ___ __ Applicant’s Name Address _I (Street) . Phone Number ^y ^ (City)(State)(Zip Code) Check One j ^ Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono Partnership 3 Corporation Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded ¥«ar Mfar. Gross Wt. Rear Axle Wt. Sire/Yards License Number '7f // ‘7L-FmI.Ajt JJ ^4?y? fvi/s-/-7f3 General area of City served Schedule of Collection charges/ dates Approximate number of customers in Orono /S’O I’Location of dumping area _________¥/V^//¥- IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, TOO MOST ENCLOSE THE POlXONXNGs Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insur^ce I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees ^xesOreguired by law. The above information is correct. >V*lO_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _6^-3* 9 -i App&icaA’t' ' ^ Date JJi]7i__________________________________________________________ 75. POr'^CITT OSE ONLY: After review of application, staff recoinmen^e|0f ji 75, y. Approval Other (soeclfy)or. Signature ol! City Official jr'5-9J Other (»P«cl«y)/^cf7/>7-7Mj||A yOU 9271320 COOi Mi U Date 04/: I' i CITT OP ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN 55 473-7357 '\ V.. License Year Date Received Fee Paid Initials GARBAGE 6 REPOSE fjvPR 5’0 *S LICENSE APPLICATION The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. BusIness/Pirm Address n. hk'e. /rrVtc/i TnO. Business Phone Number 9 /)fj.Applicant's Name Address “9 ^_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (Street) ^ ~~T (<^ity) Phone Number ^2^ Check One: _ _ _ _ Individual /y/A7. (State) (Zip Code) Humber of Vehicles to be used in Orono Partnership Corporation Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loadad Loaded Year Hfgr. Gross Wt. Rear Axle wt. Size/Yards License Number JX XnH ik Trt-C' rh eod> General area of City served 9m y/ £0 ydx yof 9^ yM 7ljA£. ^/JAi yu t my Schadule of Collection charges/ dates Me A. —/fh Approximate number of customers in Orono > ¥ IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, TOO MOST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING* Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of Insurance in the arount of $100#000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. ^»“*“*^,f** *■ ® $30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). ,r. I am the owner and operator of the above business and 1 have paid all license fees and taxes required by law. The above information is correct. I- and Mxes reauirea oy xaw. xn« rmoF fc' » \ ---------f^ume-nfficE fORjCITY 08* ONLY* After review of application, staff 7c m /^ Approval _________ Denial -------------- Other (ap^cif^^ 01 |p g.g A'tl tura of city Official jT' 5-9^fCnPT~TH6HK Y9ImWcooi not TiS!Date CITYof OUOXO (612) 473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 i : 1?^ SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION rAPR 3 0 •'.CC.X All questions rr.ust be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification nusr be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Business or trade -.ame r’T^C'/^ ^i^^ Business address ^ Business phone 3 iS' Residence phone ^ ^_ _ _ Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification Pit/h'p ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Type of certification held: Installer _ _ _ _ Certificate expiration date Pumper Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year 19^ ■/' Have you ever had a license revolted? Where? f\Io When? 7 T V *'C M c r'ijn u 1 » I c'l u'ni.'MtJ' Do you do Municipal Sewer hcok-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes _ _ _ rri;.*i/*r "rTiTI L'> I aui. No No f T M dl 4. t.'W V W r» f rcMi/j. \futr VI L. • V’. c-.} wi'* vv ocrcT/jT^ ruMifi' vmft f nfitfii f Ul/ SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: wwi iTv 4 /U /7A .VT/ 1. 3. i^4. $50.00 License application fee. — jjnii $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono asj5p,/•/®TT obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. J $50-100-300,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance, Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Date '2^'' ? *3 Applicant's Signature _ _ _ _ CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial:w Denial Date City Council Action Date Date license mailed Aonroved Denied V.04/25/03 PR CB PRREGOR 170 COUM&IBraiGMAY 1 0 1993CnYOFOMHIO 05/31/93 PR: 171CM PRREQOR EHP • NAME 47108S060 474563339 471040171 47S443I62 472503901 469526026 476643387 475089721468621018 472520007 468701868 507585424 460686562 468420832 460087881 474667812 475380151 477500666475444240 477463877 388025358 471569863 473141624 477647270 475604753 504260307 472500574 121262417 480843542 477700023 334506281 477028770 473108428 468000535 476783251 470700001 46004tl07 475382083 473746173 473600620 470566520 469020194 475560177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704004 ANDERSON, BRUCE L BOBZIEN, SUE A BOSHA, JAMIE L BRINKHAUS. JOHN F CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L DELANEY. JANE E DEMBOUSKI^ JAY C ENGLISH ill, IRVING ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHENICH, DAN T FRITZLER, iOHN M GAFFRON. MICHAEL P GERHAROGoN. JOHN R GOMAN, DAViD J GREGORY, JAMES D HALLIN, DOROTHY H HANSEN. STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN, CAROLE JENSEN, ROONEY W JOHNSON, BRADLEY P JOSTROM. FOREST J KARNITZ, RICKY D KENNEN, JANICE M KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A KUEHN, THOMAS M HABUStH, JEANNE A MCNICHOLS, DAVID L MOORSE, RONAlD J MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES NELSON, DAVI6 0 OAS. DANIEL O OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G OBRIEN. RANDY L OMAN. LYLE E PALMAR, GREGORY A QUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J ROSS, JOHN A SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X THOMTON, MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK, MARK W YTDDPT GROSS 31 15441.45 31 9250.03 12 5593.33 42 14466.29 31 15503.18 31 14694.94 93 247.80 31 12588 7631 14751.74 31 14261.96 31 14709.82 31 15193.98 33 13225.43 42 18330.25 35 1812.25 42 12365.95 12 11302.02 42 10919.78 31 5253.40 12 8169.83 03 69.53 475505202 VANG. BRUCE L 468629488 VEE. LINDA S 500403192 WALTERS. LINDA 0 477881539 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J CURRENT GROSS 1597.81 1014.64 596.25 1611.67 2055.50 1566.39 101.75 1484.081605.40 1568 1509 2018 1473 1937 246 1424 1260 1083 539 826 40 76 26 44 42 98 73 28 28 05 70 69.533115172.90 1686.0303206.25 206.25 31 1264.62 170.03312035.19 251.88150126 36 1014.64 15 19456.21 2167.603316562.46 1845.213111488.09 1319.201221550.83 2311.843114347.03 1568.41351282.30 125.650320.65 20.654210035 06 1222.089211070.68 1083.293313225.42 1473.44 42 10018.76 1029.11 92 13058.15 1366 320210941.08 1083.2893189.75 180.75314204.37 255 054210816.90 1083.280311392 02 1269.283118483.18 2050.203113724.02 1509.763113654.96 1509 763114335 29 1686 03 33 11392 93 1269.28 12 8732.90 982.00 15 7600.97 588.40 33 10034.37 1117.03 59,155 04 YTD CURRENTEMP 8 NAME DPT GROSS GROSS 469188026 CALLAHAN, EDWARD J 11 1500.00 300.0018324677GOETTEN. J.DIANN 11 1208.35 241.67470366069HURR, JOELLEN L 11 1208.35 241.67473646272JABBOUR, GABRIEL 11 1208.35 241.67476527186KELLEY, CHARLES 11 1208.35 241.67 1.266.68 . vJCOUNCIL CHECK REGISTER THU. APR 29. 1993, 8:31 PM pagt 1lECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL27959<•>1993/04/29 64,181.0064.181.00*CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION W/H & TRANSFERRED 9999-2030 000263 IP 27960 <•> 1993/04/29 6133.56 6133.56* COLONIAL LIFE INS INS W/H 9999-2030 000255 IP 27961 <• > 1993/04/29 658.40 658.40* C0I«1ERCIAL LIFE INS INS W/H 9999-2030 000268 IP 27962 <•> 1993/04/29 68.633.62 68.633.62* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA WITHHELD FEDERAL/MEDCR/FI 9999-2030 000264 IP 27963 <• > 1993/04/29 62 555.55 62.555.55* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA CITY SHARE FICA & MEDCR 9999-2030 000251 IP 27964 <*> 1993/04/29 634.115.77 634.815.77* FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LA NET PAYROLL TRANSFER 9999-2030 000250 IP 27965 <•> 1993/04/29 1993/04/29 6339.31 6339.31 6676.62* FRIGIDAIRE COMPANY FRIQIDAIRE COMPANY REFRIGERATOR REFRIGERATOR 0480-4540 0484-4540 000272 000272 IP IP 27966 <•> 1993/04/29 61.118.00 61.118.00* GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 000269 IP 27967 <•> 1993/04/29 61.031.84 61.031.84* GROUP HEALTH PLAN W/K INSURANCE 4/25 A 5/9 9999-'>030 000258 IP 27961 <•> 1993/04/29 6146.50 6146.50* HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A MARK THOHTON 8CO266780 9999-2030 000256 IP 27969 <•> 1993/04/29 6164.00 6164.00* HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT A DALE SKREEN 8C0262310 9999-2030 000261 IP 27970 <*> 1993/04/29 630.00 630.00* ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 W/H DEF COMP 9999-2030 000265 IP 2/871 <•> 1993/04/28 6350.00 6350.00* LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SER W/H UNION DUES 9989-2030 000249 IP 27972 <•> 1993/04/29 6498.72 6498.72* MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN W/H INSURANCE 4/25 A5/9 9999-2030 000260 IP 27973 <•> 1993/04/29 62.558.72 62.558.72* MEDICA CHOICE INS W/H 4/25 & 5/9 9999-2030 000267 IP 27974 <•> 1993/04/29 65.59 65.59* MINNESOTA BENEFIT INS W/H 9999-2030 000257 IP 27975 <"> 1993/04/29 62,660.26 62.660.26* MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAX WITHHELD 9999-2030 000252 IP 27976 <■> 1993/04/29 6100.00 6100.00* MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF C W/H DEF COMP 9999-2030 000271 IP COUNCIL CHECK REOISTEF THU, APR 29, 1993, 9:31 PMCHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT. . . . . . .PEBSCO/OBRA %. I P«9« 227977 <•> 1993/04/29 S75.51$75.51“ 27971 <*> 1993/04/29 $643.46 $643.46“ 27979 <•> 1993/04/29 $54.00 $54.00“ 27990 <•> 1993/04/29 $3,411.99 $3,411.99“ 27911 <*> 1993/04/29 $21.00 $21.00“ 27912 <•> 1993/04/29 $2,000.00$2,000.00“ $65,926.10“ DESCRIPTION W/H OEF COMP PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS W/H OEF COMP PERA LIFE INS INS W/H PERA UNITED WAY CHARITY W/H 2AHL EQUIPMENT CO 9999-2030 000270 9999-2030 000259 •999-2030 000253 9999-2030 000266 9999-2030 0002S4 QRACO LUBE EQUIP-FINAL 0494-4560 000273 MANUAL“■jp"IP IP IP IP IP IT Of OROMO POST ?, HAY 5, 1993, 11:50 AM---req: LINOA--- VOIO, TYPED AND - -loc: flNANCE-- REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOT --job: 1800 KS2555. . . Batch file; HCC43093 Page 1 prog: OH450 <1.51»- -report id: TRBPROOf CCOUNT NUMBER tOGRAH / OBJECT 1T-4S56-0129-31 L;:E OlV EXPENSE •ITINCS-CONf*SCHOOLS /59-2030-9999-00 AUNCE SHEET PAYROLL CL '.CRUEO WAGES PAYABLE ’-4354-0039-12 >D»tN OlV EXPENSE ;iINCS-CONf-SCHOOLS ,31-4356-0039-12 -MIN OlV EXPENSE hEETINCS-CONf-SCHOOLS .1-4243-0129-31 'OllCE OlV EXPENSE PRCCXAM -4232-0590-83 .Lf OP DIV EXPENSE ■JIPMENT PARTS t ACCES 2-4321-0549-81 ER OP OlV EXPENSE STACE Invoice Number Secondary Ref Encb PO# / Pmt Product ID Invoice Amt Distribution Amt Discount Amt Retail Amt Item Description--Item Description Units Inv Date Tax Tax Amt Due Date Tax2 Tax2 Amt Pst Date Chrg Charge Amt Ck lO-NO Duty Duty Amt Batch 10 Vendor ID / PEDB Cd / Addr Cd Vendor Name Vendor Address Vendor City, State Zip Division Code and Description ssBSSssa 000102 10.00 1 04/01/93 10.00 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0,00 OR026927 HC043093MEETING Net Amount:10.00 000103 5.59 1 04/01/93 5.59 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 OR026928 HC043093UH 4-n Net Amount:5.59 000104 69.00 1 04/02/93 69.00 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 OR026929 HC043093MEETING Net Amount:69.00 000105 181.80 1 04/02/93 181.82 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 0R026931 CONFFRENCE HC043093 Net Amount:181.82 000106 250.00 1 04/06/93 250.00 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 OR026932 HCQA3093DARE PROGRAM Net Amount:250.00 000107 50.00 1 04/13/93 50.00 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 0R026933 HC043093SUPPLIES Net Amount:50.00 000108 321.46 1 04/13/93 12B.60 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 0R026936 HC0430931ST QTR BILUNG Net Amount:12B.60 Eaa*sa====-***-**“•**** T101 P GOLDEN VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB No Address Lines AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 495 P MN BENEflT ASSN PO BOX 19900 ST PAUL, MN 55119 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE T268 P CITY Of HOPKINS NO Address Lines AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE T050 P CRAGUNS LOOGE i COMP CENTER 2001 PINE BEACH ROAD BRAINERO, MN 56401 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE T269 P SCHIPfELLY PUPPETS No Address Lines AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Term Mi sc Post Rfnd fmt SpCk CkTy R1/2 Prep asss saas .000 01 NB HU PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 T270 P SAMS CLUB No Address Lines PR .000 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 629 P POSTMASTER No Address Lines CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PR .000 01 Nl NU LU 01 NB HU LW 01 NS HW LU 01 Nt HU LU 01 M NU LU HU LU IIY OF ORONO POST IP, MAY 5. 1993, 11:50 AM---req: LINDA- CCOUNT NUMBER tOCRAM / OBJECT IscssasBssssxrsssss^ ^rS-4321-0569-82 iUEIt OP OlV EXPENSE •OSTACE I1-1042-9001-00 klANCE SHEET GENERAL FU lAMCE FUND GOlF COURSE #1-4900-0299-52 FECIAL PROJECT CONTING FECIAL PROJECTS-CONTING »1 -4356-0129-31 >OUCE OtV EXPENSE KETINCS-CONF-SCNOOLS »1 -4321-0129-31 «UCE OlV EXPENSE iOSTACE >01-4321-0129-31 >aiCE OlV EXPENSE •OITAGE >01-4382-0020-11 ;iTY COUNCIL keying expenses Invoice Nurtier Secondary Ref Encb PON / Pwt Product ID Item Description 000108 1ST OTR BILUNG Net Amount: 000109 GOLF CHANGE FUND Net Amount: 00C11O MAIL NEWSLETTERS Net Amount: 000111 CONFERENCE Net Amount: 000112 POSTAGE Net Amount: 000113 POSTAGE Net Amount: 000114 MEETING Net Amount: Invoice Amt Units Distribution Amt Tan Tax Amt Discount Amt Tsx2 Tax2 Amt Retail Amt Chrg Charge Amt 'Item Description Duty Duty Amt s?rsszsssr=xssss =«*«============ 321.48 1 192.88 0.00 0.00 192.88 300,00 1 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 614.32 1 814.32 0.00 0.00 614.32 45.00 1 45.00 0.00 O.OC 45.00 75.00 1 75.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 5.00 1 5.CO O.CO O.CO 5.00 60.00 1 60.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 H PROOF Batch File: HCCi5C<J3 P.ige 2 C_ _ _-----<1 S1 >- - • ♦ reoort id • TDRPCmfproQj ^\ i^ Inv Date verdcr to / PS03 Cd / Addr Cd Term Due Date Vencor Name Mi sc Post Pst Date Vendor Address Rfnd rmt Ck lO-No Vender City, State Zip SpCk CkTy Batch ID Division Code and Description R1/2 R-ep = = 3 = = sr s = rr = r = jc*=zs= = = = 3 = = = r== = = sr**x =ssss ssss 04/13/93 629 P PF .000 04/01/93 POSTMASTER 01 04/30/93 NO Address Lines NB OR026936 CRYSTAL BAT, MN 55323 HV HC043093 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW 3 04/13/93 536 P PF .000 04/01/93 CITY OF ORONO 01 04/30/93 PETTY CASH NB OR026937 00000 HW HC043093 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LV 9 04/13/93 629 P P».000 04/01/93 POSTMASTER 01 04/30/93 NO Address Lines NB OR026938 crystal bay, MN 55323 HU HC043093 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LU 10 04/19/93 003 P P«.000 04/01/93 ATOM 01 04/30/93 PO BOX 16521 NB 0R026939 ST PAUL, MN 55116 NU HC043093 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW 11 04/19/93 629 P P«.000 04/01/93 POSTMASTER Ul 04/30/93 No Address Lines Ni 0R026940 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 MV HC043093 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW 12 04/19/93 629 P PF .000 04/01/93 POSTMASTER 01 04/30/93 No Address Lines NB 0R026941 CRYSTAL BAT, MN 55323 NW HC043093 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LW 13 04/26/93 859 P PR .000 04/01/93 WESTONKA CHMBR COM 01 04/30/93 5600 LTNUOOO BLVD NB 0R026942 MOUND, MN 55364 HW HC043093 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LV 618.84 16.50 1 04/28/93 16.50 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 16.50 0R026944 HC043093 28.00 1 04/28/93 28.00 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 28.00 0R026945 HC043093 20.00 1 04/29/93 20.00 04/01/93 0.00 04/30/93 0.00 20.00 08026946 HCO43093 2.55 U$«r CoBfSuted Tptsl: Distributioo Tot«l: Pag* 3 id: TRBPROOPd TermNtsc Post Rfr^ Pint SpCk CkTy n R1/2 Pr*pB« S3VX amaa»R .000 >R .000 '^Y^au^cJU:iTT Of ORCNO POST■JE, APR 27, 1993, 7:34 AM---req: tlNOA VOID, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF -loc: FINANCE. .job: 1674 4IS5552. . .ACCCUNT NUMBER PROGRAM / OBJECT Invc’ce Nunioer Secondary Ref Encb ?on / Pmt Product ID/ Item Description-asasaaacsssszBssssssssas assssssssszrzss=001-1280-9001-00 000084BALANCE SHEET GENERAL FU m^AID EXPENSE-INSURANC INSURANCE Net Amount: Invoice Amt Distribution Amt Discount Amt Retail Amt Item DescriptionAM M A «• « « « ^ M M M ^ ^ ^ ^33,689.0033,689.000.00 0.00 33,689.00 Units Inv DateTax Tax Amt Due DateTax2 Tax2 Amt P$t DateChrg Charge Amt Ck ID-NoDuty Duty Amt Batch ID• • • ^ M « w « *■ ^ ^ ^B M A ^B «a A103/09/9303/09/9303/31/93 CR026916 HC033193 Batch File: HC033193 Page 1prcg: CH450 <1.51>- -report id: TRBPROOFVendor 10 / PEDB Cd / Addr Cd Vender Name Vendor Address Vendor City, State Zip Division Code and DescriptionSSSC3 = = SS3 = SSS:SSSSr=SSSSSSSSSS416 P PRIMC INSURANCE TRUST C/0 EBA 8441 UATZATA BIVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE A » ^B « » « W.000 sssa »R .000 999-2030-9999-00 BALANCE SHEET PAYROLL CL ACCRUED WAGES PAYABLE 000085 3/14 UH Net Amount:5.59 03/09/93 495 P 03/09/93 HN BENEFIT ASSN 03/31/93 PO BOX 19900 0R026914 ST PAUL, MN 55119 HC033193 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PR .000 99-2030-9999-00 BALANCE SHEET PAYROLL CL ACCRUED WAGES PAYABLE 000086 3/14 WH Net Amount: 54.00 1 54.00 0.00 0.00 54.00 03/09/93 598 P 03/09/93 PERA INS 03/31/93 SUITE 200-514 ST PETER ST 0R026917 ST PAUL, HN 55102 HC033193 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PR .000 a .000 TCN 99-2030-9999-00 BALANCe SNEET PAYROLL CL ACCRUED WAGES PAYABLE 000067 99-2030-9999-00 iALANCE SHEET PAYROLL CL CCRUED WAGES PAYABLE 0C1-4383-0129-31 POLICE DIV EXPENSE LICENSES i TAXES 001-4356-0129-31 POLICE DIV EXPENSE MEETINGS-CONf-SCHOOlS APRIL FEE Net Amount: 000089 3/14 WH Net Amount: 000090 LICENSE Net Amount 000091 MEETING Net Amount: 1.614.66 1 1.452.66 0.00 0.00 1,452.66 58.40 1 58.40 0.00 0.00 58.40 16.50 1 16.50 0.00 0.00 16.50 20.00 1 20.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 03/09/93 678 P PR .000 03/09/93 SAFE BENEFITS 03/31/93 6681 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 08026926 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 HC033193 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 03/09/93 143 P PR .000 03/09/93 COMMERCIAL LIFE/CRP 03/31/93 15 CORPORATE PL S ORC.?^'/li PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 HCUjJ193 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 03/09/93 T257 P PR .000 03/09/93 MN DEfUTT REGI STAR 03/31/93 No Address Lines OR026909 HC033193 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 03/09/93 not P PR .000 03/09/93 GOLDEN Val4 COUNTRY CLUB 03/31/93 No Address Lines Ct(026910 HC033'93 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE OF CRCMO POST *P« 27, 1993. 7:34 AH---re<q: LINDA-- UNT NUMBER IRAM / OBJECT VOID, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF •••loc: finance. .job: 1674 #S5552. . . Batch File: HC033193 Page 2 prog: OH450 <1.51>**--report id: TRSPROOF 1262-9001-00 NCE SHEET GENERAL FU lER POSTAGE INVENTOR 43U-0S 90-83 OP DIV EXPENSE MSES t TAXES *321-0129-31 ICE DIV EXPENSE rAGE *356-0039-12 IN OIV EXPENSE riNCS-CONF-SCHOOLS *303-0129-31 ICS OIV EXPENSE ENSES S TAXES •*302-0080-16 SERVICES •PROSECUTIONS hiizi-0129-31 ICf DIV EXPENSE IT AGE Invoice Nurber Invoice Amt Units Inv Date Secondary Ref Distribution Amt TaM Tax Ant Due Date Encb PO« / Pmt Discount Amt Tax2 Tax2 Amt Pst Date Product ID Retail Amt Chrg Charge Amt Ck ID-NO Item Description-•Item Description Duty Duty Amt Batch ID -rsss=======“===33SS3SSSSS£====S mS33==SS 000092 900.00 1 03/09/93 900.00 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 OR026912 POSTAGE HC033193 Net Amount:900.00 000C94 332.99 03/09/93 332.99 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 OR026918 LICENSE HC033193 Net Amount:332.99 000095 150.00 1 03/09/93 150.00 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 OR026919 POSTAGE HC033193 Net Amount:150.00 000096 90.00 1 03/09/93 90.00 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 OR026920 CONFERENCE HC033193 Net Amount:90.00 000097 16.50 1 03/09/93 16.50 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 0R026923 LICENSE HC033193 Net Amount:16.50 000098 7,500.00 1 03/09/93 7,500.00 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 0R02692* 2ND QTR LEGAL HCa33193 Net Amount:7,500.00 000099 100.79 1 03/09/93 25.09 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 0RC26911 POSTAGE HCC33193 Net Amount:25.09 Vendor ID / PEDS Cd / Addr Cd Vendor Name Vendor Address Vender City, State 2tp Division Code and Description r=============-ssss=======-*“* 629 P PP POSTMASTER No Address Lines CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE T258 P dept of the treasury No Address Lines AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 629 P POSTMASTER No Address Lines CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 423 P LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 3490 LEXINGTON AVE NO ST PAUL, MN 55126 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE T257 P MN DEPUTY REGI STAR No Address Lines AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 549 P MINNETONKA 14600 MINNETONKA BLVO MINNETCMIKA, MN 55345 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 536 P CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 00000 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Term MlSC Post Rfnd Fmt SpCk CkTy R1/2 Prep ssss SS9S .000 01 NB NU .000 PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 01 NB HU LU 10 01 NB HW LU 11 01 NB NU LW 12 01 NB mi LU 13 01 NB HU LW 14 01 NB HU LW 15 T OF CRONO ROST VOID, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF CtCUMT number ■RXRAM / OBJECT ;i*A321*0039-12 JNIN OIV EXPENSE '.STAGE J1-4210-0T74-33 AIMING t ZONING DIV EX MCE SUPPLIES •4341-0590-83 ,F OP DIV EXPENSE NT AUTO EQUIPMENT '4-4232-0590-83 CF OP OIV EXPENSE •UlPf«NT PARTS 8 ACCES T4-4321-0590-83 LF OP OIV EXPENSE OSTAGE '01-4362-X20-11 :TT COUNCIL EETIN6 EXPENSES 01-4306-0299-52 iPECIAl PROJECT CONTING ITNER CONSULTING SERVICE AF’---req: LINDA---- -loc: FINANCE-----job: 1674 #55552. . . . Invoice NLrber Invoice Amt Units Inv Date Secondary Ref Distribution Amt Tax Tax Amt Due Date Encb PO# / Pint Discount Amt Tax2 Tax2 Amt Pst Date Product ID Retail Amt Chrg enlarge Amt Ck I0‘No Item Description--Item Description Duty Duty Amt Batch ID sasssssaxsxsssss sssrxsssxassssss SXSSX3SSZXSSSSSS xasszxs? 000099 100.79 1 03/09/93 0.29 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 0R026911 POSTAGE HC033193 Net Amount:0.29 000099 100.79 1 03/09/93 29.45 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 0R026911 SUPPLIES HC033193 Net Amount:29.45 000099 100.79 1 03/09/93 3.20 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 OR026911 CAR WASH HC033193 Net Amount:3.20 X0099 100.79 1 03/09/93 13-91 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 D.OO OR026911 PARTS HC033193 Net Amount:13,91 000099 100.79 1 03/09/93 5.30 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 OR026911 POSTAGE HC033193 Net Amount:5.30 X0099 100.79 1 03/09/93 23,55 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 0R026911 MEETING EXPENSE HC033193 Net Amount;23.55 000100 1,614.66 1 03/09/93 162.00 03/09/93 0.00 03/31/93 0.00 0R026926 APRIL FEE MC033193 Net Amount:162.00 Batch File: HC035193 Page 3 prog: CH450 <1.51>- -report id; TRBPROOF Vendor !0 / PEDB Cd / Addr Cd Vcrdor Naire Vendor Address Vendor City, State Zip Division Code and Description ssrsrs5==s=s===3S==s==S5=s»=*’ 536 P CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 00000 AP ACCOINTS PAYABLE 536 P CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 00000 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 536 P CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 00000 AP ACCOUNTS PAYA0LF PETTY CASH 00000 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 536 P CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 00000 AP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00000 Term Hisc Post Rfnd Fmt spCk CkTy R1/2 Prep ssss ssss .000 01 NB HU PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 PR .000 01 NB HU LU 17 01 NB HU LW 18 01 NB NW LU 19 01 NB mi LU 20 01 NB HU LU 21 01 NB HU LU 22 CITY OF ORONO POST T«, APR 27, 1993, 7:34 AM---req: UWA--* VOID, TYPED AND REVERSED A/P BATCH PROOF - -tcc: FINANCE. . .jcb: 1674 *$5552. . . ACCOUNT NUMBER M06RAN / OBJECT Invoice Amt Units Distribution Amt Ta» Discount Amt Ta*2 Inv Date Tax A(Tit Due Date Tax2 Amt Pst Date Invoice Number Secondary Ref Encb PO# / Pmt Product ID Retail Amt Chrg Charge Amt Ck lO-so Item Oescription--Item Description Duty Duty Amt Batch ID (••Hssaas«sssccss3s*ssxs aaaaassssssaasas — Mtch 10; NC033193 System Computed Total: 44,548.43 sssszsszsszsasa zaszsrxrasaaaasr aaaarasa User Computed Total: Distribution Total: Net Total: Batch Mle: HC033193 Page 4 -prog: OH450 <T,S1>-••-report id: TRBPROOf Vendor ID / PEOB Cd / Addr Cd Vendor Name Vendor Address Vendor City, State Zip Division Code and Description 2sz=ss«xssrzssz=sszsss3ssaaaaa aaaa 44.548.43 TOTALS MATCH 44.548.43 44.548.43 Term Misc Post Rfnd Fmt SpCk CkTy R1/2 Prep aaaa aaaa •- . ;COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. MAY 5 . 1993. 9:37 PM P»9«ACCOUNT PO MANUALDESCRIPTIONNUMBERINVOICE NO NUMBER279S61993/05/10 $19.55 A T A T TELEPHONE<•>$19.55* 279S7 1993/05/10 $19 08 A-1 MINNETONKA RENT RENTAL 0549-4345 000550 OH <»>$19.08* 27988 1993/05/10 $252.76 ADT SECLRITY SYSTEM ANNUAL SECURITY FEE 0590-4331 7579899 OH <•>$252.76* 27989 1993/05/10 $1,547.82 AMERICAN SPEEDY PRTQ NEWS LETTER 0299-4900 013567 OH <• >$1,547.82* 27990 1993/05/10 $351.12 ANCHOR PAPER COPY PAPER 9001-1261 712652 OH <•>$351.12* 27991 1993/05/10 $13.47 ANDERSON-BRUCE MTG 0129-4356 000518 OH <•>$13.47* 27992 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 $80.00 $80.00 $70.00 ASPLUND COFFEE ASPLUNO COFFEE ASPLUND COFFEE COFFEE COFFEE COFFEE 0039-4382 0174-4382 0129-4382 58274 58274 58274 OH OH OH <•>$230.00* 27993 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 $42.65 $28.64 $28.64 $28.64 $28.64 $28.64 AT A T INFO SYSTEM AT A T INFO SYSTEM AT A T INFO SYSTEM AT A T INFO SYSTEM AT A T INFO SYSTEM AT A T INFO SYSTEM DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING 0129-4340 0059-4340 0069-4340 0129-4340 0174-4340 0249-4340 000517 000517 000517 000517 000517 000517 OH OH OH OH OH OH <•>$185.85* 27994 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 $35.86 $44.84 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF AUGIES MOBILE CHEF SANDWICHES RESALE 0591-4802 0591-4802 57095 S7330 OH OH €•)$80.70* 27995 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 $146.97 $23.43 BLACKC lAK A SONS BLACKOWIAK A SONS TRASH HAUL TRASH HAUL 0099-4343 0590-4343 000523 000523 OH OH <•>$170 40* 27996 1993/05/10 $47 93 BUDGET PRINTING ENVELOPES 0129-4322 35945 OH <•>$47.93* 27997 1993/05/10 $12.76 CELLULARONE TELEPHONE 0249-4320 000522 OH <•>$12.76* 27998 1993/05/10 $80.00 CHESWICK/GARY JAN-APR CITY HMO CONT 0129-4151 000520 OH <•>$80.00* 27999 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 $73.25 $16.07 CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE LS FLASHER 0569-4324 0249-4324 000555 000555 OH OH <•>$89.32* 28000 1993/05/10 $549.50 COCA COLA VENDING POP 0591-4815 000538 OH <• >$549.50* CCK NO CHECt( DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOK DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL21001<*>1993/^05/10 9308.919308.91*COLONIAL LIFE INS CO INS 0129-4152 000524 OH2S002<•>195J/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 917.99 939.25 967.67 96.99 $21.41 92 02 92.63 90.85 91.95 9160.76*COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COW1ERCIAL LIFE/GKP COPMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/QRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP COMMERCIAL LIFE/QRP MAY INS MAY INS MAY INS MAV INS MAY INS MAY INS MAY INS MAY INS MAY INS 0039-4152 0069-4152 0129-4152 0174 -41520249-41520549-41520569-41520590-41529001-1298 000521000521000521000521000521000521000521000521000521 OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH28003<•>1993/05/10 995.85995.85*COPY DUP PR INC DEVELOPER 9001-1261 017115041 OH28004 <• >1993/05/10 918.19 918 19*CUSHMAN MOTOR CO PARTS 0590-4232 58398 OH28005 <• >1993/05/10 958.50958.50*DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 0591-4815 7480 OH28006<•>1993/05/10 9160.779160.77*DEPT PROPERTY TAX POSTAGE 0040-4321 000525 OH 28007 <•) 1993/05/10 9300.00 9300.00* DICKS AUTO DETAIL CLEN 3 SQUADS 0129-4550 9419 OH 28008 <•> 1993/05/10 95.265.00 95,265.00* E-Z RECYCLING APRIL FEE 0295-4392 000637 OH 28009 <• > 1993/05/10 9161.99 9161.99* EARL F ANDERSON ASSC STREET SIGNS 0249-4233 123021 OH 28010 <• > 1993/05/10 999.00 999.00* EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 0591-4815 198444 OH 28011 <• > 1993/05/10 $535.87 9535.87* ELECTRIC SERVICE CO REPAIR SIREN 0175-4342 100527 OH 28012 <• > 1993/05/10 927.50 $27.50* ENGLISH IRVING MEETING 0129-4356 000526 OH 28013 <• > 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 9174.91 930.24 9205.15* FRITZLER J MARK FRITZLER J MARK CONFERENCE MEETING 0129-4356 0175-4356 000527 000528 OH OH 28014 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 9138 01 9216.84 9165.27 910 24 930 34 931 13 G 4 K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES MATS UNIFORMS MATS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 0099-4343 0249-4221 0129-4343 0590-4221 0569-4221 0549-4221 000553 000553 000553 000553 000553 000553 OH OH OH OH OH OH ACCOUNTNUraCR INVOICE NO 0129-4152 000524 '003900690129017402490549056905909001 41524152415241524152415241524152129t 000521 000521 000521 000521 000521 000521 000521 000521 000521 • 0 n 09001-1261 0171150410590- 4232 5S39t0591- 4S1S 7410 0040-4321 000525 0129-4550 9419 0295-4392 000637 3249-4233 123021 3591-4815 198444 3175-4342 100527 3129-4356 000526 3)29-4356 000527 1175-4356 000528 1099-4343 1249-422: 129-4343 590-4221 569-4221 549-4221 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, MAY 5. 1993, 9;37 PM pagt 3lECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTNUMBER INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL<•>S591.83*28015 1993/05/10 S31.12 GAFFRON, MIKE MILEAGE 0174-4381 000529 OH<•>$31.12«28016 1993/05/10 $15,117.75 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS C OFFICE FURNITURE ALL BLDG 0480-4540 000551 OH<•>$15,117.75''28017 1993/05/10 SI.000.00 GOLF CAR MIDWEST GOLF CART RENTAL 0590-4331 000552 OH<• >$1,000.00*28018 1993/05/10 S32.03 GRAINGER-W W PARTS 0569-4232 4952990762 OH<*>$32.03*28019 1993/05/10 $145.85 HACH CHEMICAL CO SUPPLIES 0549-4234 264883 OH1993/05/10 $80.19 HACH CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS 0549-4234 270557 OH<•>S226.04*28020 1993/05/10 $222.22 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER LUMBER 0290-4231 76087 OH<• >S222.22*28021 1993/05/10 S11.40 HAPPYS POTATO CHIP CHIPS 0591-4802 236132 OH<•>$11.40-28022 1993/05/10 $88.92 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED GRASS SEED 0590-4343 50264 OH1993/05/10 $47.17 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED GRASS SEED 0590-4343 0U0530 CH<•>$136.09*28023 1993/05/10 $2.53 KEAVENYS DRUG SUPPLIES 0129-4243 000S31 OH<•>$2,53* 21024 1993/05/10 $68.99 KUEHN, THOMAS MILEAGE APRIL 0069-4381 000554 OH 1993/05/10 $6.27 KUEHN, THOMAS MILEAGE APRIL 0174-4381 000554 OK 1993/05/10 $25.09 KUEHN. THOMAS MILEAGE APRIL 0569-4381 000554 OH <•>$100.35* 28025 1993/05/10 $179.80 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC REPAIR RADAR wa^9-4342 16471S OH <»‘ >$179.80- 28026 1993/05/10 $40.85 LAND EQUIP CO PARTS 0249-4232 34899 OH <*>$40.85- 28027 1993/05/10 $190.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CONFERENCE 0020-4356 000556 OH <•>$190.00- 28028 1993/05/10 $45.00 LINOERHOLM TRUCKING FRIGIDAIRE FREIGHT 0484-4540 128 OH 1993/05/10 $45.00 LTNDERHOLM TRUCKING FRIGIDAIRE FREIGHT 0480-4540 128 OH <• >$90.00- 28029 1993/05/10 $65 00 LOES OIL CO FILTERS 0249-4342 5991 OH <• >$65.00- 28030 1993/05/10 $240.00 LONG LAKE FAMILY PRACTICE HEPATITIS SHOTS 0129-4306 000533 OH <• >$240.00- $19.00 HEMA TREASURER MEETING 0175-4356 000535 $19.00* $15^.39 $157.39* MERLE VOGT REFUND FEE 9001-3502 000564 $198 36 MIDWEST ASPHALT ASPHALT 0249-4233 9091 $398.38* $51.60 $9.86 $9.87 $9.86 $9 86 $9.8G $50.39 $75.58 MIDWEST BSNS MIDWEST BSNS MIDWEST BSNS MIDWEST BSNS MIDWEST BSNS MIDWEST BSNS MIDWEST BSNS MIDWEST BSNS PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 0039-4210 0059-4210 0129-4210 0069-4210 0174-4210 0249-4210 0549-4210 0569-4210 511634 511834 511834 511834 511834 511834 511834 511834 $226 88* $«8.59 $48 59 $48 58 $48 58 $48 58 $48 58 $34 17 MINN COMM MINN COMM MINN COMM MINN COMM MINN COMM MINN COMM MINN COMM OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES TELEPHONE 0039-4210 0059-4210 0069-4210 0129-4210 0174-4210 0249-4210 0249-4320 514580 514580 514580 514580 514580 514580 000557 P»9» *COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED. MAY 5. 1993. 9 37INVOICE NO 4244 OOOS324232 16504*4232 165239-4232 332550 -4341 33674M -4232 33641 -4232 33605-4115 1124660 PONUMBER CHECK NO CHECK DATE28041 1993/05/101993/05/lC 1993/05/1028042<■>i29611511151115111514151415141514151 193101193108193108193108193108193108193108193108193108 5-4356 000535 )l-3502 000564 49-4233 9091 1993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/10 CHECK AMOUNT81,067.348523.17 835.7981 ,626.30*824.98 824.98*8150.00 875.00 8225.00*81,508.92 8330.07 8306.498212.18 82.357.66*VENDOR DESCRIPTION 28046 <•> 26047 <• > 82.434;29* 81,139.29 81,139.29* 834.16 834.16* MINNEGASCOHINNEGASCOMINNEGASCOHN BENEFIT ASSNMN PLANNING ASSOCIATION MN PLANNING ASSOCIATIONMOTOROLA INC MOTOROLA INC MOTOROLA INC MOTOROLA INCNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSP UTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIESDUESDUESMAINT AGREEMENT MAINT AGREEMENT MAINT AGREEMENT MAINT AGREEMENT 1210 t2l0 12 It) 1210 1210 1210 4210 4210 511834 511834 511834 511834 511834 511834 511834 511834 210 210 210 210 1210 1210 k320 514580 514580 514580 514580 514580 514580 000557 28048 <•> 28049 <•> 28050 <*> 898.62 898.62* 84,501.39 84,501.39* 28052 <* > 28053 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 1993/05/10 28053<•>1993/05/101993/05/10 828.84$116.45$166.30*28054<•>1993/05/10 $228.00$228.00*28055 <■ >1993/05/10 $217.00$217.00*21056<■>1993/05/10 $19.50$19.50*21057<*>1993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/10 $68.88 $198.00 $21.25 SI .686.46 $29.86 $2,004.45*28058<•>1993/05/101963/05/101993/05/101993/05/101993/05/10 $98.65$45.00$41.64$16.44$71.76$273.49* 28059 <•> 1993/05/10 $9.24 $9.24* 28060 <*> 1993/05/10 $345.06 $345.06* 28061 <•> 1993/05/10 $24.20 $24.20* 28062 <•> 1993/05/10 $195.96 $195.96* lOUNT<SEK INVOICE NO PONUMBER MANUAL1-4232 9290 OH1-4233 9311 OH1oo0005ISOH1-4800 FU8181 OH1O000560OH1-4221 62018-1 OH1-4550 64711.1 OH1-4550 65062.1 OH1-4550 64317.1 OH1-4232 65463.1 OH1-4323 000534 OHJ-4323 000534 OHJ-4323 000534 OH>-4323 000534 OH1-4323 000534 OH1-4381 000546 OH>-4343 000561 OH 1-4221 000547 OH >-4320 000562 OH 1-4320 000541 OH >-4320 000541 OH 1-4320 000548 OH >-4320 000541 OH >-4320 000548 OH >-4320 000548 OH >-4320 000548 OH >-4320 000548 OH 3-4320 000548 OH 3-4323 000541 OH S-4320 000563 OH >-4343 444375 OH COUNCUMEEnMMAY 10 1993 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEElOBfOF HELD APRIL 19, 1993 « .1' I I iIfifPUr ^ ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Chair Maureen Bellows, Charles Schroeder, Jeff Johnson, Ed Cohen and Stephen Peterson. Candace Rowlette was absent. The following represented the City Staff: Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Septic Manager Stephen Weckman, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Edward Callahan, Gabriel Jabbour and JoEllen Hurr were present. Chair Bel lows cal I <sd the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (•1) #1813 LEONARD O. NISKA, 2304/2308 SHADYWOOO DRIVE - SUBDIVISION CREATING PRIVATE EASEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub 11 cat ion and Certificate of Mai I ing were noted. Jayne Kvhar, applicant’s attorney was present. Mr. NIska arrived during the discussion. Mabusth noted earlier in 1992, the City granted a conditional use permit for the storage shed structure located on this through lot. The principal structure encroaches the adjacent property. The owner is in the process of selling his property and the buyer has requested an easement for maintenance of the house, and the adjacent neighbor has indicated he does not wish to sell a portion of his property. Kvhar added this issue needs to be resolved for title purposes, and they felt this was the best solution. Bellows stated she Is uncomfortable creating this type of easement, and felt they would be setting an unfortunate precedent. She noted the easement lacked adequate controls on time restraints for existence cf the encroaching structure and felt this could be subject for abuse in the future. suggosted the easement be a I lowed to remain as long as the residence Is located on the property. Mabusth stated they have not considered a request such as this In the past. Bellows stated she would be loath to allow rebuilding a residence if the existing were removed on this substandard parcel, and felt by allowing the easement they would be locked into doing so. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 ZONING FILE *1813 - CONT. Mabusth noted if the house were destroyed, a lot area and width variance would be needed to rebuild. Bellows stated they are asking for the creation of something highly irregular. Kvhar noted, if approved, they would be responsible for the creation of necessary documents. Cohen inquired about exchanging land with the adjacent property owner. Niska arrived, and stated the neighbor was unwilling to consider, in part because the land to the back of the property is more usable to him Mabusth said the easement area is 32.5 s.f., or a 7" encroachment. Pat Brick ley, adjacent neighbor, said he was not totally in opposition to the exchange of land, and Just thought the easement was the easiest way to remedy the situation Johnson stated he was not opposed to the easement, and felt either way the lot line Is contrived. Cohen reiterated concerned with. It is the precedent of the issue they are It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Peterson, to recommend denial of the easement request for Application #1813, Leonard Niska, 2304/2308 Shadywood Road, but to recommend approval of a lot line rearrangement between the two properties, assuming both owners agree to such. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#4) #1818 RUSSELL LUND ESTATE, 905 TONKAWA ROAD > PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 8:25 - 8:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Tracey Lund and Mark Gronberg were present. Mabusth reviewed this is a two lot subdivision, and noted both lots meet the 1 acre zoning standards of the LR-1B zoning district. The existing shed on the proposed shared lot shall be removed. She referred to past conditional use permit approval for independent antenna structures, and suggested removal of such. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 ZONING FILE 91818 - CONT. Mabusth noted total hardcover for the developed lot will be 16.6X, with excesses in the 0-75’ and 250-500’ zones. Bellows suggested adjusting the lot line to eliminate the overage of hardcover. Gronberg noted that they are well under the maximum allowed in zones nearer the lake, and suggested by adjusting the lot line, the City would be encouraging the developer of the vacant parcel to build closer to the lake because of the reduced area in the 250- 500* zone. Bellows stated it would still be a 2 acre buildable lot. Gronberg indicated it appears they are being penal I zed for building the existing house further from the lake. Lund stated they are trying to keep a balance between the two lots and to move the lot line to accommodate hardcover would be dIsruptive. Gabriel Jabbour suggested they consider the average lakeshore setback with respect to the properties. Johnson inquired about the history of the paved ramp to the lake. Lund stated it was originally installed for private access to the lake. He indicated the vacant lot has steeper terrain to the lake and expressed concern about access. Mabusth referred to the 20’ wide sewer easement within the undeveloped lot which serves no purpose and suggested the vacation of such. Lund questioned whether the pad for the antenna located within the kennel structure could remain. Mabusth stated she would like to inspect the kennel area, and said It would have to be made clear to a future owner that It could not be used for an antenna structure without City approval. Johnson felt the ramp to the lake should be removed as it adds water and contaminants to the lake and is located within the 0- 75* zone. Gronberg felt they would be creating an additional erosion problem if the ramp were removed as slopes In this area are 12-15*. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 ZONING FILE §1818 - CONT. Lund noted that since It was Installed they have struggled with ground cover In this area due to erosion. Johnson felt that was not an Issue as clay could be compacted and the area sodded. Lund said he would need to confer with the other half of the estate before agreeing. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of Application «1818 for Russell Lund Estate, 905 Tonkawa Road, approving a prel iminary subdivision subject to condi t ions set forth In the staff memo and the removal of the asphalt ramp to the lake In the 0-75' zone on Parcel B. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•5) 81808 JON a SHIRLEY BILLIGMEIER, 2935 FARVIEW LANE - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:15 - 7:18 P.M. Mr. and Mrs. Bllligmeier were present for this application. Mabusth explained at the last review of this request the applicant was asked to confirm the alternate drainfield site and to have surveyor locate the proposed court on the survey. The location of the alternate septic site has been confirmed, and the applicant has agreed that the tennis court be moved 5* further from the road, maintaining a 17* setback. The structure is also located In front of the principle structure Bellows stated all other issues were addressed at the previous review. Mabusth added they have not received any negative comments from the neighbors. It was moved by Bel lows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of Application #1806 for Jon and shirley Bllligmeier, 2935 Farvlew Lane, approving a street setback variance of 33* and allowing the accessory structure to be placed In front of the principle structure, per conditions set forth In the memo and that there be no outside lighting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#6) #1P07 SUSAN MARIE SUMEY, 1330 CK£RRY place — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:18 - 7:24 P.M. The Af f i dav 11 of Pub I i cat I on and Cert I f I cate cf Mai I ing were noted. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19. 1993 ZONING FILE #1807 - CONT. Ms. Sumey was present. Mabusth explained this application Involves major filling and grading In the lakeshore yard to eliminate a sav®''® problem, and to save a 2* inch diameter elm tree. She noted .he applicant has submitted an amended proposal addressing an or staff's concerns and requests. She said there 1$ no need for further review by other agencies. Sumey presented photos showing the rip rap was In existence. Bellows commended her for quickly resolving Issues brought up by staff. Mabusth added this form of restoration Is excellent. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application S1807 for Susan Marie Sumey, 1330 Cherry Place, approving a conditional use permit and variance to allow filling and grading In the lakeshore yard. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#7) §1808 JAMES R. ABRAHAMSON, , -4630 TONKAVIEW LANE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:24 - 7:30 P.M. The Affidavit of PubI icatlon and Certificate of Mai I Ing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Abrahamson were present for this application. Weckman explained the applicants request a ' build a residence on this substandard property. He noted the similar type of development In the area. He added additional acreage that the applicants could purchase. The access easement Is provided for this property across Parcel 0. Bel lows noted this request Is si Ightly below the 60% margin a I lowed by code without variance approval. Cohen asked If the applicants knew this was an unbull dab Is lot when they purchased It. Mr. Abrahamson stated their purchase Is contingent upon approval of the variance request. He added, a new residence Is being constructed on Parcel B. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend approval of Application #1808 James R. Abrahamson. 4630 Tonkavlew Lane, approving a lot area variance to construct a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19. 1993 (•8) 91809 DANIEL A BARBARA HOFFMAN. 1135 HERITAGE LANE VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:32 - 7:44 P.M. The Affidavit of PubI Icat Ion a*- ^ I f icate o' Mai I Ing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Hoffman were present. Weckman explained the applicants request a lot area, front a;>d sidi setback variances to reconstruct their home destroyed by fire. Ti a lot Is 1.1 acres In a 2 acre zone. The house is proposed to bo constructed with the same setbacks as the existing. He added there is an Increase in hardcover, but total Is still below the maximum a I lowed. Cohen Inquired about the separation from the gazebo. The Hoffmans replied they would be willing to move It over to meet the 10* separation setback. Weckman stated the existing septic system was found to be non* conforming and a new system will be required. The property does not contain an alternate site, a condition similar to many In the neighborhood. Johnson questioned the need for the 5’ setback. Mr. Hoffman stated If the house were moved over, they would have to deal with drastic elevation drops, which would be more expensive and require additional fill and retaining walls. It was moved b, Peterson, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of App'icr.tlon #1809 Daniel and Barbara Hoffman. 1135 Heritage Lane, *or lot area, side and front setbac.. variances to construct a now residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#9) #1810 HENRY DENERO, 1245 6TH AVENUE NORTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 - 7:50 P.M. The Af f Idavi t of Pub 11 cation and Cert I f I cate of Mailing were noted. Nancy DeNero was present. Weckman explained there Is an existing caretaker’s apartment above the existing garage and attached by a breezeway to the main house. Bellows asked If there are footings for the breezeway. 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1810 - CONT. Wackman stated to his knowledge there is just block under tnis area. He said the apartment has its own access door to the exterior. He said this use has existed for many years. Recently the owners applied for a permit to upgrade the apartment, and it was determined they would need a conditional use permit. Bellows asked that this be referred to as a guest house, and clarified that they would not allow the renting of this area. She stated that assuming there are no footings under the breezeway, they can treat this area as a separate building, thereby allowing the independent exterior access. OeNero noted the residence was built in 1937 and is a landmark to the area. She stated the house has been restored and maintained that way. They only wish to upgrade the electrical and other safety features. It was moved oy Bel lows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of AppiI cat Ion #1810 Henry DeNero, 1245 6th Avenue North, approving a conditional use permit for a guest house use. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#10) #1811 C. JACK REMIEN, 3237 CASCO CIRCLE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:50 - 8:25 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub H cat I on and certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. Remien was present. Weckman noted this Is a variance request has been approved three times in the past. He noted the applicant wants to assure buiIdabiIity prior to selling. The preliminary plans appear to meet height and hardcover requirements. He reviewed p.*evlously approved hardships for this property, and noted the common ownership policy of the City. He stated many lots in the area are of similar size. He referred to one objection letter from the neighboring property owners and a letter submitted by Remien providing background Information. Beli'ws read the letter from Remeln. Warren and Christine Blelke expressed strong opposition. Hf» stated the lot Is substandard, and there are issues t**'*t were not discussed with previous variance review. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19. 1993 ZONING FILE #1811 - CONT. Mrs. Bielke stated when they purchased their property, the variance had not yet been approved. She noted they along with Remien opposed the first variance request, prior to Remien purchasing the parcel. She read a letter from their attorney presenting reasons for denial. She referred to Section 10.08 dealing with variance approval regarding the health, safety and welfare of the public, and suggested the erosion problem in this area should make the lot unbuildable as it would be adding to the problem and would be detrimental to the neighborhood. She added they did have their house listed prior to this situation, but felt this may depreciate the value of their home. She felt this request does not meet the criteria for approval, and suggested this lot be combined with Lot 19. Mr. Nisiediak, potential buyer of Lot 18. advised that the house will be built back f.om the lakeshore and will not add to the erosion problem. He felt the house he would build would not lower the standards of the neighborhood, and said he would be willing to supply the Bielkes with plans to present to potential purchasers of their property. Weckman reviewed that the sewer connection stub for Lots 18 and 17 Is located within the boundary of Lot 18. Mrs. Bielke stated it is 3.5* within the boundary of Lot 18, and added they were unaware of that situation when they purchased their property. She said the records of the City indicate that Lot 18 was unbuildable and that is why the sewer line was placed within Its boundary. Mabusth disagreed, and stated the three parcels Lots 16, 17 and 18 were owned in common at the time of Installation of that pipe, and that is why it was placed on Lot 18. Mrs. Bielke read from memo from Gaffron to the City Council dated December 1985 which states, "they do not anticipate that Lot 18 would become buildabie". Bellows Indicated that statement means the Bielkes need a new stub to their property. She felt hard pressed to deny the request because of past approvals. She noted the property has changed hands several times as a buildabie lot, and this request would not set a new precedent in the neighborhood. a HINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COHHISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1811 - CONT. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of Application #1811 for C. Jack Remlen, 3237 Casco Circle, approving lot area and width variances to construct a new residence. Johnson said he respects the position of all involved parties, and could not support the repuest as he felt the property should be combined with Lot 19 as one condition for approval is that no additional land is available. Bellows felt that was an incorrect interpretation of the code. Mabusth noted the code specifically states that substandard lots, whether In single separate or commonly owned, are to be Judged on thelr own merIts. The finding that no additional land is available was validated during the variance review because at the time the lot was not owned in common with adjacent lots. Peterson felt approval requires too many variances. Schroeder questioned why the neighbors did not buy the parcel. Mrs. Bleike stated they were unaware that It was for sale until too late. Jay and Gay Richards, 3243 Casco Circle, stated they were given the impression that Remlen purchased the parcel for use In conjunction with Lot 19. He said the only reason why the City approved the variance in the past was because it had been taxed as buildable, and an attorney owned It at the time and the City did not want to be brought into legal action. Bellows felt that issue was not pertinent. Vote: Ayes 3, nays 2. Johnson and Peterson voted nay. (#11) #1812 THOMAS PATRICK GOODYEAR, 712 rONKAWA ROAD VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 6:40 - 9:05 P.M. The Affidavit of PubIication and Certificate of Mai IIng were noted. Mr. Goodyear was present. Mabusth reviewed the applicants request to add a second story to the existing residence, Includint the addition of a 2’4- expansion into the rlc»'t side yard to square off the foundation. The applicant also proposes alterations to the existing boat bouse. HINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19. 1993 ZONING FILE #1812 - CONT. Bellows Inquired about the separation between the garage. Mabusth noted since the garage Is over 750 s.f. there should be a 15’ setback, but there is only 4’. Bellows noted emergency vehicles could not gain access to the structures on this property. Mabusth concurred. She continued that the applicant noted the boat house to be structurally sound, however the building staff disagreed and felt this to be a total rehabilitation of the building. Total lot coverage is 4.7* over the allowed. The removal of the boat house would reduce the hardcover In the 0-75* zone to 6.7* and would reduce lot coverage enough to off-set the addition to the house. Goodyear stated he has determined that the foundation of the residence can support the addition. He added he proposes to reduce xhe size of the boat house to about half, and to pour a foundation, reroof and reside it. Bellows stated that was where she drew the line. She stated her first concern was the location of the garage and the unsafe condition present. She Indicated her desire to see historical boat houses maintained, but felt this one did not warrant that label. She disagreed with the need for the side setback variance. She felt the extent of the Improvements went beyond what the property could sustain. Johnson Inquired about the existing setback for the right side of tfe house. Mabusth explained currently there Is an 11’ setback, and the applicant proposes the extension of a 2’ chimney and the squaring off of the foundation from the chimney line. Goodyear noted the neighboring property owner has removed the garage near his detached garage and will be rebuilding further away, which creates a better separation. Peterson felt the project to be too aggressive. Schroeder agreed with the need for the separation for safety reasons, but stated no objection to the addlilon of a second story. Goodyear asked that the application bo tabled opposed to denied. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 ZONING FILE *1812 - CONT. It was moved by Cohan, seconded by Schroeder. to table Application #1812 for Thomas Patrick Goodyear, 712 Tonkawa Road. Johnson said he supported the request with the exception of the boat house and would like to see just the 2’ extension for the chimney then return to the setback of the original foundation. Goodyear said he would be willing to remove the boat house. Mabusth noted the chimney at 2’ is considered a non-encroachment. Goodyear said he would rather amend his request to expedite his project. Vote: Ayes 1, nays 4. Cohen voted aye. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend approval of Application #1812 Thomas Patrick Goodyear, 712 Tonkawa Road, approving a side setback variance for the left side of the house, with the condition that the right side of the house and the steps for the deck conform with the setback requirements and that the boat house be removed in Its entirety. Ayes 5, nays 0. Chair Bellows recessed from 9:05 to 9:10 p.m. (#12) #1814 TOM BERTHIAUNE 8 CHERRYL KACHENMEISTER, 3035 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:10 - 9:18 P.M. The Affidavit cf PubI Icatlon and CertI f icate of Mai I Ing were noted. Mr. Berthlaume and Ms. Kachenmeistar were present. Mabusth complimented the applicants on the material submitted. She corrected the hardcover percentage for the 75~250 zone to 58.27X calculated by staff. Schroeder clarified that the bulk of the reduction of hardcover Is piastIc. Mabusth concurred. She explained the applicants propose a * 28.2’ two story addition to the lakeside encroaching 8 into the average lakeshore setback, a 1’ side setback X^T***^®^*^ hardcover variances In the 75-250’ setback area. She noted the property contains a turnaround serving neighboring property. HINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COHMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, *1^3 ZONING FILE #1814 - CONT. Bellows clarified that emergency vehicles could get to the structures on this property. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application §1814 Tom Berthlaume and Cherry I Kachenmeister, 3035 Casco Point Road, approving a side lot and average lakeshore setback, and hardcover variances, based on the hardships of the lot size and the turnaround serving other properties located on this property. Ayes 5, nays 0. (813) 81816 KENT I SUSAN SWANSON, 3229 B CASCO CIRCLE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEAPING 9:16 - 9:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub 11 cat I on and Certificate of Mai I ing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Swanson and Mark Nesset, applicants’ architect, were present. Mabusth reviewed the 1982 variance approval of a garage addition, a family room, and widows walk connecting a screen porch within the 0-76* zone. The current request is for a second story entry addition, an addition over the existing garage, and the removal of the widows walk to be replaced with a spiral stairway with landing. She added this property also contains a portion of a shared drive at approximately 3,500 s.f. of hardcover. Bellows questioned the access for the den area over the garage. Nesset noted access has been provided by a stairway through the laundry room, not from the exterior, and this area will be used as an artist studio. Bellows expressed concern that they might become a future rental unit. She inquired about the play structure. Mabusth noted this structure is 64 s.f. and located in the 0-75* zone. Mr. Swanson indicated th*s structure is used by his children to sleep in, and replaced a former boat house. Cohen stated they typically look for reductions in hardcover as a compromise. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 ZONING FILE 91816 ' CONT. Mrs. Swanson said they had hoped the Commission would view the removal of the lakeside deck as such. She added they will also t>^ removing a corner of the house. She clarified that she has 5 children and would not want to remove the play structure. Peterson asked if the neighbor to the left objected as his views would be cut off. Mrs. Swanson noted that both adjacent residences are ch taller, and stated the neighbor has views of their drive, but this proposal would not affect their front views of the lake. It was moved by Schroeder, secoided by Johnson, to recommend approval of Application 91816 for Kent and Susan Swanson, 3229 B Casco Circle, for hardcover and setback variances to construct additions to their existing residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (914) 91817 THOMAS F. JOHNSON, 2795 SHADYWOOO ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEAI'ING 9:30 - 9:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub Iicat ion and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. Johnson was present. Mabusth indicated that Mr. Johnson was unaware of the easement situation and just prior to the meeting had requested tabling the application, but staff suggested the Planning Commission discuss the merits of the proposal and provide direction on an amended proposal Bellows questioned the location of the garage between the shed and the bridge. She felt this location may not be feasible. Johnson stated they would need to excavate the hill to accommodate the garage. Schroeder qu<>stloned the need for the cul-de-sac. Mabusth noted it would serve at least four properties. She indicated a former owner attempted to get the private easement released, but upon the recommendation of his attorney, the easement was maintained for future needs. Bellows expressed concern about releasing the easement. She felt they should ask the engineer to comment on the need and size of the cul-de-sac. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 ZONING FILE A1S17 - CONT. SchroedBr folt If the ©xisting drlv« works it should bs allowed to remain. Mabusth stated she has discussed this issue with the land owner in opposition who has Indicated no problem If the easement is replaced with an appropriate turnaround. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Peterson, to table Application #1817 for Thomas F. Johnson, 2795 Shadywood Road, pending resolve of the private easement over Tract A. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#15) #1819 GREG PETERSON, 1920 SHORELINE DRIVE - RENEWAL VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 9:40 - 9:45 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub 11 cat Ion and Certificate of Mai I ing were noted. Greg Peterson and Chuck Rausch were present. Weekman explained this Is a renewal of a lot width variance to create a buildable lot. The property has suitable septic areas. The applicant does not have a house plan at this time. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of AppIicatlon #1819 Greg Peterson, 1920 Shore!ine Drive, approving n f^fiewal lot width variance to construct a new residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#18) 2009 SUQARWOOOS DRIVE - REQUEST TO REALIGN DRIVEWAY Bellows stated she was glao to see this request up front. Tim Johnson and Thomas Klleen were present. Johnson stated they request a variance to allow the drive within the 30* side setback and to curve the drive In the front setback due to the topography of the property. He noted this location will lessen the grade of the drive and preserve existing trees In the front yard. Schroeder stated he has no problem with the request and felt It is worth It to save the trees. Mabusth noted the neighbor to the east sought the same type of variance. Johnson lelt the request to be reasonable. HINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COHMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 1993 2009 8UGARWOOOS DRIVE - CONT. Peterson indicated he had no problem with the request, but asked why the additional apron. Johnson noted this area is to be used as a turnaround. Bellows requested that the turnaround area be kept to a minimum. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of the request to realign the driveway on 2009 Sugarwoods Drive. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•17) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Bellows requested that in the future the Planning Commission representative be prepared to provide a comprehensive review of Council’s action on alI land use applications. (#18) OTHER ISSUES None. (#19) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, approve the minutes of the March 15, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•20) REPRESENTATIVE TO THE COUNCIL MEETING Johnson volunteered to attend the meeting May 10, 1993 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Peterson, to adjourn the regular Planning Commission meeting at 9:55 p.m. Maureen Bellows, Chair Person f'. .P t h TO: FROM: Ron Moone, City Administrator Gerbardsoii* PuMk Works Director DATE;May 6, 1993 SUBJECT: Park Tour • June 1. 1993 On lune 1. 1993 at 6:00 p.m. the Park Commission will be conducting a tour of some of the Orooo parks and recreation fKilhies. The parks that will be visited are as follows; 1. 2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Old Crystal Bay Road Bike/Hike Trail proposal Crystal Bay site Hackbeny Navarre Playg Bederwood Summit Park Sw Lowry Nature C mm ling Beach The Park Commission members are inviting the Mayor and Councilmembers to attend. Please let me know who will be attending. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE MEETING 4:00 P.M Thursday, May 6, 1993 Burwell Room Community Center 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota Agenda: 1.EIS Process ifu- 2. Hennepin Parks Water Quality Study. NA% '4 1S» ...... T‘J A City of Long Lake 1964 Park Avenue - Long Lake. Minnesota 55356 Phone; (612)473-6961 May 3,1P93 Mr. Edward Callahan, Esq. Mayor, City of Orono PO. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 5.^323 Dear Ed; PIcu.se find enclosed a copy of my letter to the Western Hennepin Pioneers Association and a copy of their re pcnse We found Jim Roehl’s response and presentation to the Long l^e Council very interesting and particularly pleased when he provided us maps showing the original platting of the City. ApparenOy th^clo^Foxirnin' of lake and highway (road really; began at that time. I guess planning for the future was just as tough in 1860 as it is now. Tod Olson, Mayor City of Long Lake cc; Ron Moorse r \n j UL .MAY. .4 WS3 i /g.4^u^JciJz0,WHERE THE WEST BEGINS March 25,1993 Mr. Jim Dillman West Hennepin County Pioneer Association P. O. Box 332 Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Dillman, I have been advised that the historical usage of the Long Lake and Orono areas by Indian tribes has been studied by the West Hennepin County Pioneer Association. The purpose of this letter is to request that you provide the City of Long Lake with the results of that research to date. As you are aware, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) is conducting an environmental study related to the proposed expansion of Highw^ 12. As part of ttiat study, MNDOT Is examining the historic usage of the aiea by Indian Tribes. We should like to forward your information covenng the historic usage of our area by Indian tribes to MNDOT. Could you please provide information on Indian usage of the following areas: a The Tepee Hill site at Union Cemetery b. The Pat Dickie property on Watertown Road c. Other local areas which have a history of Indian activity. Tod Olson, Mayor Long Lake CITY HALL 1964 PARK AVENUE • LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA 55336 • PHONE: {612)473-6961 Li J5?^ESTERN HENNEPIN COUNTY PIONEERS ASSOCIATION, INC. >6 Aoril 4. 1993 (FOUHOEO 1907' P.O. Box 332 Long LaKC, f*N 55356 Mr. Tod Olson, Mayor City of Long Lake 1964 Park Ave Long Lake, ML’ 5 5 356 REG£IVE'3 ^ Mayor Olson and Council, In regard to your letter of March 25, I have taken the time to review the background of Native Americans in Long Lake and this region. Be informed that our expertise is limited to interpretations of white settlers, who entered this region after 1853. In no way can we give you precise _ , archaeological data, or more importantly the knowledge of Indian peoples. Since the Native Americans in this region left no written records, except petroglyphs, we must rely o; oral accounts as well as the tools of modern archaeology. Archaeological finds in the area date to the Eastern Archaic tradition(3000 BC) and the later Woodland and Mississippian finds are also evident. In prehistoric times this region was covered with great hardwood forest, called the Big Woods. Maple Sugar became a staple to the diet of these hunter-gatherers as did wild rice, which was harvested as early as 1000 BC in area lakes and the shallow bays of Lake Minnetonka. Minnetonka, with its rich resources, was a magnet to various generations of these early Minnesotans. Some permanent dwelling camps are possible from the lace Woodland and Mississippian era, about the time of Christ. Abundant relic finds of an ‘agricultural nature' make this a probability, although none of these sices has been excavated by modern archaeologists.Curiosity, carelessness in development, and the greed of 'grave-robbers' degraded most of the burial mounds in Minnesota. Sites at Brackett's Point and the north shore of Crystal Bay were done by professors Winchell and Newton in the late 1800’s. They give specific details of these and other sites around Minnetonka in the 191I Lewis compilation. Due to modern development and the encroachment of new growth forests, identification of these charted sites is difficult.Over 400 burial mounds were believed to have existed around Lake Minnetonka at the time of the Winchell survey. Recently an individual has begun a new survey of sites which may prove benificial. Elizabeth Olson has done research in tnis area and discovered that a set of mounds on Long I.3ke bluff were charted by the Winchell crew(see cnc.) but we have yet to identify the exact location of these mounds. Keep in mind that today ail supposed burial mound sites are protected by law. Modern archaeologists do not disturb mounds but are only interested in the daily life of past cultures. Seasonal campsites by the more modern Dakota people surrounded Lake Minnetonka. Chief Shakopee was known to encamo at TiPi HilKalso spelled TePee Hill), the area .m. . around Union Cemetery. TiPi is a Dakata word meaning 'dwelling place'. Other sites include Wayzata(another deviation of a Dakota word meaning 'god that blows cold from the north or god of the northern pines'); Wolsfeld ’’ake, the Clasen Lake area(before drainage the area near Howard Eisinger's was actually an island; Brackett's Point; Tamarack HilKjust north of Stubbs Bay); Ox Yoke Lake; and many others along the Watertown Road including the Pat Dickey farm(formerly Mid-Meadows, See her letter of Dec. 1?91). The South Watertown Trail was a route which ran from the Fall's of St. Anthony to Watertown on the Crow River. From Wayzata westward it came out past Redeemer Lutheran, through Wayzata Country Club up the east Long Lake Road- to Hwy 12. The driveway of Union Cemetery is a stretch of the original route(paved first about 1913). The route then ran west out roughly the route of present day Watertown Road and Hwy.6. In 1913-14 the builders of the Luce Line Railroad would also follow this route, which in Native times was only a game trail. Keep in mind that this region was densely forested, with only occasion clearings. It was old growth forest, with a high canopy. The Watertown trail crossed another important route, the Shakopee to Greenwood trail(roughly CO RD 19 today) at Shrewsbury Corner(Co. Rd 6 and 110). Most of these ancient cultures were semi-nomadic and would have carried out trade with western Minnesota(for red pipestone), northern Minnesota(for raw copper) and other items. Minnetonka must have been a pivotal area for this trade and also religious ceremonies, which were conducted into the historic era at Spirit Knob(south shore Wayzata Bay), Big Island and other points. The contemporary MdeWakontan Dakata are known as the Mystery Lake People. Lake Minnetonka could be the Mystery Lake, although their true ancestral home was the Mille Lacs region. < I hope this introduction of our Native American heritage will serve your purposes or ^^t least get you started on further investigations. enc ctfully \submitted, rch Aide ^ -Pat Dickey letters -Map of Avery Stubbs- Indian trails and sites -Map of Long Lake mounds(exact site unknown) t L. MLWTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - April 14, 1993 The meeting of the Lake Use Committee of the City of Orono was held pursuant to notice at 7:45 a.m., Wednesday, April 14. 1993 at the Orono Council Chambers. Chairman J. Diann Goetten, Maureen Bellows, Charles Kelley, Candace Rowlette and Charles Schroeder of the Committee were present. City Administrator Ron Moorse, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and Deputy Clerk Lin Vee were present representing staff. The DNR was represented by DNR Water Recreation Program Supervisor Mike Markell, and Martha Reger and Stan Linnell of the DNR staff. Mayor Callahan and CounciImembers JoEllen Hurr and Gabriel Jabbour were in attendance. Concerned citizens in attendance were Marge Gasch, Bev Blomberg and Joyce Humboldt. Markell commented on the funding stams for the proposed Maxwell Bay Access. He stated the bill appropriating LCMR money for the access has passed through the State House and will be up before the State Senate for approval soon. The Senate may look at the LCMR budget in a different way but the DNR is confident the access money will still be available. The current $944,000 before the Legislanire for approval is last year’s LCMR recommendation to the Budget Committee. Moorse asked if the DNR were now pursuing additional grant money from the LCMR. Markell replied that would be two years away but is an option. Schroeder asked how much of the total funds needed for acquisition are currently available. Markell stated a rough estimate for acquisition is $1.2 to $1.7 million with $944,000 currently available from LCMR funds. The DNR does not expect any additional funding from the Slate Bonding Bill this year. Next year there w'ill be a larger bill and opportunities for more funding at that time. Schroeder asked if there were any other easily identified sources for funding and if the DNR would look at an option to purchase. Markell responded that the State Bonding Bill next year would be considered and options to purchase have been used in the past. Regarding the schedule for developing the access, Markell stated that once a concept design is chosen, the acquisition process would begin. The acquisition process takes 6-9 months including appraisals and property offers. There is not enough LCMR funding at this time for all the land acquisition. Gaffron lead discussion of the access review punchlist submitted to the DNR by the Lake Use Committee, I. Traffic Pattern and Layout. A.On-site 1. The Committee developed a plan designating traffic as one-way through the site. Linnell thought this traffic plan makes sense at this site. MLNTTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - April 14, 1993 2. Two curb cuts should be developed for Entrance and Exit for a safer situation. I.innell did not see any problem with this. There would probably be some signing done to direct traffic. 3. 4. 5. The DNR should consider a barrier or striping across the mouth of the ramp because the Police Department has suggested there may be problems with people "sneaking in" and fouling up the traffic pattern. Linnell stated the danger could be that there is not enough room to pull ahead. His initial reaction would be to consider a stripe. Proposed striping of the three ramp lanes has generated mixed reviews. Linnell noted that striping ramp lanes helps people to back-up and stay reasonably organized. Reger added this gives a visual over-the-shoulder in backing up and is very helpful. Back-in parking has apparently worked well at North Arm Landing and should be considered at this site. It reduces hardcover and may help the traffic pattern. Linnell agreed with the idea of reducing hardcover, however, backing in is a more difficult maneuver. If you have a 40’ lane and 20’ for a space, backing requires approximately 60’ of pavement. If you have a 22’ aisle and 39’ head-in parking, almost the same amount of paving is required. There are many people who have difficulty with back- in parking. A state organization of boating associations does not recommend back-in parking but would suggest pull-through, angle or head-in parking, Kelley asked if it were easier to back out when leaving and why. Linnell responded that the trailer is the harder part to control so backing into a narrow parking space is more difficult. When backing out of a space, you are backing the trailer into a wider area. Goetten noted that the Committee had hoped to reduce hardcover by utilizing back-in parking since it appeared to be successful at North Arm Landing. Also, because that particular lane will have cars going through and car-trailers backing up, it might be better to have additional space and a grassed area. Bellows added that the traffic lane did not get wider to accommodate the backing up but because the Committee felt the lane was too narrow to begin with. Markell noted that with a one-way system, room is gained. They have had no problems statewide with two-way traffic and angle or ninety-degree parking. He felt the 22-25’ aisle was fairly generous and added that the B. MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - April 14, 1993 hardest way to back is when looking over the right shoulder. Goetten stated that at this time the Committee would defer to the expertise of the DNR. 6.The lane between the middle and southerly parking blocks should be as wide as possible. Off-site 1. A stacking right turn lane for westbound County Road 51 makes a lot of sense. 2.A by-pass lane will need to be further developed for eastbound County Road 51. A small by-pass currently exists and may need to be increased in length. Linnell felt both the stacking and by-pass lanes were a good idea. In working with the County, the DNR would appreciate any help the City could offer in developing the by-pass and right turn lanes. 3.The Committee would like to consider no left turns into the access during the busiest times, depending on how things work out at the site. 4.Elimination of car-trailer and car parking on County Roads 51 and 135 is a goal of the Committee. II. Landscaping 1. Where existing hardcover will be reverted to landscaping, appropriate soils should replace the existing gravel base. Linnell confirmed that these areas will be reverted to turf. 2.The Committee would like to see 2-3" tree caliper sizes instead of 1-1‘A" diameter and a more detailed landscape plan. According to Linnell, around the Metro area tree caliper sizes are typically 1-1V4". That does not mean something larger cannot be considered for this site. Marked added that the DNR was willing to work with the City on the landscape plan. Kelley felt landscaping was an important issue and would like to see something as soon as possible. Linnell pointed out that Christmas Lake has a site that was developed in a similar fashion with some higher standards. 3.How will bermed areas be constructed and maintained.^ Linnell stated the islands are typically bermed very gently. Other turf areas may be gently sloped for MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - April 14, 1993 drainage. Drainage patterns will be studied. A berm will not be created at everv ’ grassed area. III. Fishing Pier 1.There is concern over conflict between fishermen and boaters at the channel but realize this is where the fish are and is the logical placement for the pier. Liimell noted this was a valid concern but boaters and fishermen should be able to work this out. Gaffron asked for comments on the pier design. Linnell commented that piers work best for the handicapped and seniors. The T-shape is common and typically they are 84’ in length done in 20 ’ modules so the length can be adjusted to achieve a good water depth. Gaffron asked if this was intended to be a permanent or seasonal dock. Linnell replied that it depends on the location. If little ice action or differential is expected, it would be left in place. If there is action, it could be towed to a quiet bay area. Reger added that about 90% of the piers in the Metro area stay in the water. Of the 55 piers in the nine-county Metro area, there are only 3 or 4 piers removed from the water and this is up to the local government. She gave the example of an access on Buffalo Lake in Wright County where winds coming across the lake damaged the pier so they remove the pier from that area. Gaffron asked what type of flotation material is used. Linnell responded that styrofoam encased in black polyethylene is typically used. Markell noted the only problems they have had is with muskrats chewing through the styrofoam. The extension of the pier is typically 6 ’ wide with 8 ’ width at the T. Reger noted she has information on piers constructed in the Metro area and is willing to provide it to anyone interested. She added that this site was shown to the Fisheries people and they confirmed the best location for the pier was at the channel. Fishing pier areas are typically kept separate from boat launch areas. Rowlette asked if the pier had railings. Reger responded there are railings all the way around. Kelley asked how the path from the parking lot to the pier would be constructed. Linnell thought it would be either a hard gravel or blacktop surface to make it handicap accessible. A boardwalk may be necessary in the area closest to the lake. VI. MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - AprU 14, 1993 Kelley added that he suspected the tanks were under the water table. 5.Hennepin County has advised the City of concrete obstructions out from Gayle’s Dennis Bailey at Hennepin County could provide further information. 6.The 52% hardcover on the site is reasonably acceptable but may be reduced under car-trailer back-in grassed parking. 7.The DNR should be aware of certain site concerns such as possible wells that need to be abandoned, fuel tanks at the gas station, possible septic tanks and that building foundations must be removed rather than buried on site. 8. A "milfoil bin" may help raise the public’s awareness of this issue. Operation and Maintenance. 1.The cleaning and maintenance of the site will have to be done by someone. The DNR could explore the possibility of using Hennepin County crews since they regularly maintain North Arm Landing. 2.What is the general procedure for contracting for satellite toilet maintenance and who pays the costs? 3. Occasionally the City has had to provide a police officer or reserve at North Arm Landing. By working with the design, some of these problems should be eliminated. 4. 5. Consider a winter gate but avoid daily opening and closing The site should be posted for no overnight parking and possibly limiting the hours of operation. Markell stated the DNR would not provide a conservation officer for limiting the hours but this could be worked out with the City. 6.The City is opposed to taking on any ongoing or major maintenance activity. According to Markell, the DNR always takes on the major maintenance. It is best to provide as much local minor maintenance as possible. VII. Other Issues 1.There is a minor concern about how the adjacent marinas may affect or be affected by the access. The City feels it could be an amenity to the marinas and could generate some business for them. MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - April 14, 1993 2. The City currently receives approximately $8,000 in real estate taxes from the subject properties. The Committee would like the DNR to consider an annual payment-in-lieu-ol :a.\es. Kelley asked what issue the City had not brought up that the DNR may be aware of. Marked could not think of any. He noted that conservation officers check the sites regularly. Safely issues have been discussed. Generally there are not enforcement problems at DNR public accesses. Linnell commented that some problems will be eliminated because it is a highly visible location with little residential impact. Goetten expressed appreciation to the DNR for their willingness to work with Orono and opened the discussion to the public. Jabbour commented that a turn lane was definitely needed for stacking purposes. Linnell responded that they did not anticipate stacking up to occur in the turn lane as approximately 10 car-trailers could be wailing in the site. Jabbour noted that the existing by-pass lane is very short. Jabbour felt the pier should be removed every u uuring the winter because snowmobilers use this area to access the Lace Line and the pier may not be visible. Reger noted that all their fishing piers are refleciorized and this pier may be detached and fi'.ated to a more secluded bay. Jabbour reiterated that parking should be eliminated within 2,000 feet of the site on all roads. Goetten agreed and felt the Committee had been clear about this issue. Jabbour was also concerned about winter access to the bay because the adjacent marinas may catise safety problems on the ice. Residents in the area also would like to see the access closed during the winter months. The Committee felt that if a chain or gate were placed at the access entrance that people could still get around it, therefore, a gate at the ramp may be more efficient. Jabbour noted there are several other accesses in the area that could be used in the winter. Because of the unique position of this site between the two channels and aeration of the adjacent marina, safety is a major concern. Marge Gasch, 1035 Tonkawa Road, staled a neighborhood meeting had recently been held. She thanked the City of Orono and the DNR for working together on this maner. She also stated that the DNR had met with some of the residents last fall to discuss their concerns. She noted four concerns of their neighborhood conunittee: 1. People using Tonkawa Road and how the left turn into the access will affect the flow of traffic. Goetten noted the Lake Use Committee is also concerned about this and will continue to work on this issue. 8 MEVUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - April 14, 1993 3. Little fishing is expected to take place along the shoreline near the parking area but if this becomes a problem in the future, some kind of pathway may need to be installed. 4. Pedestrian traffic along Tonkawa is a concern. Could a fence be put up in this area? Goetten noted the Committee wanted to protect the people going to the fishing pier from the traffic. Kelley added that it would force people to park in the parking lot. Linnell stated this would be an option to look at. Sometimes it is difficult to keep people from going around or over a fence. IV. Amenities 1. 2. 3. 4. The Committee considers this a boat launch facility, not a park. Lighting should be provided at the ramp and curb cuts. Linnell stated the DNR usually provides the minimum necessary lighting for safety. Kelley requested that lighting be directed downward so neighbors are not affected. Linnell replied there are specs on this particular type of lighting typically used at access sites. Kelley also suggested that these lights be turned off during the winter if the access is closed for the winter months. Linnell agreed that it would not make sense to light the access if winter use were prohibited. Portable satellites would be acceptable for sanitary facilities. A reminder was given that a well would have to be used if running water were ever considered for the access because City water is not available. Linnell stated that water is not typically provided at public access sites. Reger noted that a well on the Luce Line is often vandalized. Picnic tables or benches would not be required at the site. Benches may be desirable in the future. Linnell agreed this is not to be a park site. Benches may be a possibility, especially along the pathway to the fishing pier. Elderly people may wish to have a resting place. •A comprehensive signage package should be developed. Reger stated that the DNR is starting to put all of their signs on one or two wooden kiosks to make them more attractive. The access at Waconia is an example. She can send pictures of what they look like. It organizes the signs and puts them all in one area. Maps may also be displayed in the kiosks. Goenen expressed concern that they are not always easy to read. Linnell stated that some signs have larger print and are two-sided. The signs are placed where people are out of their cars so they can easily read them. Goetten also asked for MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - April 14, 1993 a sample. 6. 7. The site should be posted for "No Swimming". There is concern over not providing any trash cans. The City will monitor how this works at other sites this summer. Linnell stated they are not typically provided because they often attract more garbage. 8.A "milfoil bin" should be considered. The County indicates there i.' 'ittle milfoil collected at access sites. Many people pull what is on the boat off a*.v: throw it back into the lake. If a milfoil bin were provided, it may act as a conscious reminder to boaters of the problem. Linnell thought the danger of providing a milfoil bin would be that it would become a garbage can, so this would have to be worked out with the City. 9.A "make-ready" dock may be desirable. Linnell stated the intent was to provide two docks between the ramps clearly defining the three-ramp area. A "make- ready" dock is a good idea given the high use and frees the ramp up more quickly. It is difficult to patrol a "make-ready" dock to monitor that it is not being used for more than a few minutes. He added that at some sites a "beaching area" has been provided that has been quite successful. A small, sandy area adjacent to the ramp works well for this. 10.Another issue may be a winter gate at the entrance or boat ramp. Because of the neighboring marinas, the ice may not be safe. V. Environmental Concerns 1.Although the 15' setback is not met, the 45-65’ proposed setbacks are a better situation than what exists at this time. 2.Stormwater controls are an integral part of the plan and the City would like to see more detailed plans. Linnell responded that stormwater drainage with a detailed plan of erosion control will be developed and topographies will be done. 3.Because of past shoreline problems with Gayle’s, rip rapping would be expected Rip rapping will be provided if necessary according to Liimell. 4.The City assumes that the DNR will take sole responsibility for restoration of the illegally dredged area if this is not resolved. Linnell stated that restoration would be taken care of as part of the purchase of the property as well as the fuel tanks. 4 i MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE - April 14, 1993 If the Maxwell Bay access were posted with limited hours, signage could also be placed giving information that North Arm Landing is open 24 hours. The residents would like the bridges (and surrounding banks) to be posted "No Fishing" since the fishing pier will be available. Fishing is detrimental to boaters using this area. If there are concerns or problems at the access, who could the residents call, the DNR, Orono, etc.? Kelley staled that the agreement the City has with the DNR should have a statement regarding negotiation of future issues. Hurr asked about the fact that the County thought there should be lighting since they provide no lighting at North Arm. Gaffron stated that Dennis Bailey, Heimepin County, had indicated the County has wanted to put lighting at North Arm tor sometime and maybe this year it would happen. Joyce Humboldt, 850 Panenwood, stated she was against having an access and asked if the DNR had done an environmental impact study. She is concerned about the environment, quality of the lake, boat usage and the milfoil problem in this bay. Three marinas in the area affect'the water quality. Sh^ feels replacing a marina with an access may cause heavier usage of the bay. Goetten responded that Orono is very concerned about en' Tonmental issues. This issue has been discussed for a number of years and progress has been made. Some of the issues, such as the milfoil problem, should be addressed to the LMCD. Markell noted that the DNR does not typically do environmental impact statements on accesses as it is not a requirement of the process, however, environmental issues are looked at. Humboldt does not want to see the terrible milfoil problem in Maxwell Bay spread to other parts of Lake Minnetonka. Goetten suggested that Humboldt put her comments and concerns in letter form and send them to the Lake Use Committee. Jabbour commented that development of this access is a major asset to the community. He noted that there is an area which is zoned for a future marina which would total four mannas if this access is not developed. The Lake Use Committee agreed that the information they have compiled, along with that being submitted by the DNR. could be moved to the Planning Commission for further 4 MINUTES OF THE LAKE USE CO>L\IITTEE - April 14, 1993 consideration. Goetten thanked the Committee for their time. Kelley asked how the Planning Commission would act on this information. Gaffron thought variances for hardcover and a commercial site plan review would be required. Mayor Callahan noted that the Committee has done what it was charged to do and the DNR has responded, but it may be many months before the DNR is in a position to have the Planning Commission review this information. Goetten agreed. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 a.m. Attached to these minutes is a copy of "Maxwell Bay Residents Concerns Regarding Public Access" and a list of those attending the citizens committee. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT rn c T2nd Quarter 1993 Report to the Mayors ^ - •* 4 7:00 am, Tuesday, May 18, 1993 LaFayette Club 1. Welcome and self introductions of persons present 2. Overview of the reports being presented, Chair Cochran 3. Progress reports on program priorities: a. Budget preparations for 1994 and board policy plans addressing levy expectations for 1994 budget preparations, Treasurer Carlson, Minnetrista b. Eurasian water milfoil control program projections and zebra mussel report, EWM Task Force Chair Tom Penn, Tonka Bay c. Lake Access Task Force progress. Chair Jim Grathwol, Excelsior d. Assessment of the public proposal to address the LMCD board member selection procedure, and to consider a format whereby this procedure may be addressed for possible legislative review 4. Discussion of reports presented today or other items of interest recommended by the attendees 5. Review of current meeting format, and consideration of a date for the 3rd quarter meeting 6. Closing remarks. Chair Cochran Please confirm or advise regrets by Friday, May 14, 473-7033, LAKE HIUNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO:LMCD MEMBER CITIES FROM;LMCD CHAIR, DAVID H. DATE:APRIL 28, 1993 RE:LMCD FUNDING SOURCES Recently concern has been expressed about pending legislation which would aLn^certaL statutes relating to the LMCD to eliminate language granting specific but limited taxing authority to the member cities to fund the LMCD budget. We think it appropriate to advise you of the LMCD-s ''ie"'® the leqisiation and tL expressed concern that, if enacted, the legislation iouirauthorize or encourage the LMCD to increase its reliance on the member cities' taxing authority to finance its programs. vlrst the proposed legislation was introduced without the LMCD's Liowledge or support and the LMCD has not endorsed it and will not do secLd it is important to note that the legislation does not affect the Authority of the LMCD; it affects the authority of _ nor-iHiaT- ritics The LMCD does not possess any taxing authority. xSlrd? and most fepoftant, the legislation even if ^ttsttte In Which it was introduced (we understand it may be amended to restore ?tSltation) will not be considered by the LMCD as a mandate or TaLTlr or?he^L^?D'r4ta?u?orfauihLi^^ to^worLng^for^statutory changes, if necessary, to funding base to include all users and beneficiaries of the Lake. We affirm that commitment. Each member of the LMCD board is appointed by and hor member c'tv We Welcome your thoughts and comments on all of the itLt; tltet^tng tht Lake and the LMCD. PUtticularly those relating to financial matters. As you know, the LMCD is ®“'=’"evilw and proposed P“^9et in June to each city^gover^ J proposed budget comment. Our practice is c 4-0 #mnc;ure that you hayeafte»r the May Board meeting to ensure tnau ywu i*a c; Mayors V i LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 E. Wayzata Blvd, Suite 160, Wayzata MN 55391 473-7033 Tuesday Friday Saturday 8 Tuesday Wednesday Tuesday Friday Wednesday 04/29/93 LMCD MEETING SCHEDULE I-LAY 1993 Lake Access Task Force Access Siting Subcommittee 7:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Lake Access Task Force Steering Committee 8:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata LMCD Lake Access Committee 7:00 am, LMCD Office, V^;ayzata Water Structures Committee 7:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata Environment Committee 8:00 am, LMCD Office, Wayzata Lake Access Task Force 7:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata 2nd Quarter 1993 Mayors Meeting 7:00 am, Lafayette Club,Minnetonka Beach Lake Use and Recreation Committee 7:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Eurasian V/ater Milfoil Task Force 8:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata Administrative Committee 6:00 pm. Tonka Bay City Hall LMCD Board of Directors Regular Meeting 7:30 pm. Tonka Bay City Hall t fWE A PUBLICATION OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA LAKESHORE OWTS’ERS ASSOCIATION Sprite;1993 Issue 2 of 4 Government Affairs Committee by Steve Wood LMLOA has formed a Government Affairs Com­ mittee to be co-chaired by Steve Wood and Bob Tomalka. Others on the committee are Bob Leighton, Bev Blomberg, Galen Golz, Don Germanson and Jen­ nifer Dotzenroth. Bob Tomalka is looking for several other folks to join the committee. We meet the third Monday of each month, 5:00 p.m., at the Lafayette Club. If you have an interest in tlie Government Affairs committee, call Bob Tomalka at 472-9376. The purpose of the committee is to maintain a high profile for LMLOA with appropriate agencies, groups and governmental offices and to keep the board and membership up to date on pending >aws, regulations, policies or other decisions by the various entities that impact LMLOA's mission. We've identified 3 issues as top priority: 1. public access 2. infiltration of exotics (e.g. milfoil. Zebra mussels) 3. property taxes We will try to keep eveiyone educated on these topics, but also with what all the various agencies are doing, and advise the LMLOA Board on what actions we should implement. Something you can do that would be helpful is let me or someone on the comniittee know when something is happening that impacts the lake. For example, if a city council is addressing a lake-oriented issue, or some development is being propo.=:ed on or near the lake, give one of us a call. Also, clip out articles, public hcaj-ing and fax them to Steve Wood at 471-7547. notices, etc.. I| ■ ■ --------- ---------------------------- 1 In this Issue...ii i 11 1 From the Helm 2 ii The Steamboat is Coming!1 1 1993 Board of Directors 5 •i Minnetonka Memories 6 •' Bygone Days on Minnetonka 7 i Pi'operty Tax Update s Lakewatch 1 i 3 r Ron Glesne was elected to the LMLOA Board for a 2-year term. He expresses his views on what being a member means to him... New Board Member, Ron Glesne, Gives His Reasons Why I have lived on Lake Minnetonka for the last 20 years. Like most of my neighbors and fellow lake residents, the lake has been an enormous part cf my family's life. Whether swimrung, fishing, water skiing, sailing, boating, or simply enjoying its scenic beauty, we have received much more than we have given back. Unfortunately, it takes something drastic, like the Milfoil infestation, to move most of us to action I immediately joined LMLOA following its formation in the hopes that I somehow could give son ning back to what I had been taking from for years, in a small way, 1 feel that tliis is being accomplished. In the few weeks since being elected to the Boaid of LMLO.A, I realize that a very few dedicated people have been working, and continue to work, e.xtremely h:ird and put in many hours to improve the quality of life on the lake. Not unlike most erganizations. it is a few people who do the work while many benefit. Yes. L.MLO.A has greatly increased its membership (now over 1,000), but just joining is not the answer. With over 4,000 lakeshore homeowners on Lake •Minnetonka, it really amazes me that all of these people have not become members of this veiy worthwhile organization. We strongly lu ge all of you to join and to get involved. Not only is there strength in numbers, but you too can be a giver rather than a taker. (Glesne cnniinucil an fnr^e 4) r Pact- 2 On TheLdhc From the Helm... Miles Canning My heartfelt wish is to be able to pass on to famil.es 20 years from now i cleaner, more safe and well-managed Lake Minnetonka. The more I learn about Minnetonka's politics, ecolog>- and demograph- •cs the more I realize we must act now on behalf of the next generation. ^his lake is a limited resource. This pains some developers and politicians who only see more as better, but I believe overcrowding is both unsafe and niicidal. Lakeshore neighborhoods, public manna users and users of tree oublic access must all do their part to prevent the invasion of hannful e.xotic species, chemical poisoning, shoreline erosion and garbage pollution. Participating in this association has enabled me to get to know my neighbors and neighborhood. LMLOA activities bring together ^Id-timers, new people, and ?ver>'one who wants to learn ibout their home tou /l The LMLOA Newsletter and member­ ship resource book give members timely, relevant and accurate information. Our “issue” committees. Taxation, Access, Environment md Governmental Affairs all need your input and offer you a chance to educate yourself. The “opera ­ tions ” committees: Newsletter, .Membership. Communications and Social, give you a chrmce to contribute with specific tasks. Miles Canning, LMLOA President lOUie wiin sptrtuu, lasiva. We will reach out this year and offer you the opportunity to help; join a committee, be a Social, Membershir or Communications Du-eclor for your Bay: Say, “YES, count me in.'” Don Germanson Passes on The Tiller But not my ship! (And certainly not my paddle!) Good bve? A’o. I'll still he around. Leading the LMLOA for the last two years has been, “Most Excellent!" We’ve come a long way. We fought taxes, struggled with milfoil, conducted Earth Day seminars, got the start on some great social gatherings, put our best into five annual newsletters, all while increasing the member­ ship 4009tl We need to gain improvements in: • “\\"nat is good for the lake" • bringing all of us closer together • creating a clean and safe lake environment where we can all afford t j live. I hope that, LIKE WOW, we can STILL P.-UcTY 0.\*. while we accom ­ plish these things! You ’ve got a drink coming to you if you can spot me at one of our lakeshore establishments and you quote this clip. I'll catch you off the port bow! Yours forever, Don Germanson Spring lyya LMLOA Mission Statement • To promote the preservation and reasonable use of Lake Minnetonka; • To serve as an information resource and advocate for Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners in appropriate matters; and • To promote social interaction between members through association activities. On Tfn Lake is a publicat on of the Lake Mmneunka Lakeshore Owners Association, paid for by its members and mailed to them quarterly. Deadline for articles is the 5th of the month preceding the month of issue. Inquiries can be directed to: Editor LMLOA P.O. Box 596 Excelsior. MN 55331-0596 phone 472-9876. To keep its readers better informed, LMLOA allows its columnist.'; to fully exTcress theii' opinions. .All views expressed are not necessarily those of the publication. Reporter: Pat McCollough Cartoonist: David Gillette On the Lake is a trademark of L.MLOA, Inc. Copyright © 1993, L.MLOA, Inc. Spring 1993 On The Lake Pane 3 Newsletter - Changes Coming Your LMLOA newsletter will soon have a new masthead, a new format tind updated information on issues that will be covered consistently by various board members and committee members. A new banner is "in the works. ’’ Your next newsleter will be sporting its new' look from front to back. The new'sletter format changes are being made to make it easier for you, the reader, to obtain the information you need from the various issues that are reported on by LMLOA. We want to also give you delightful articles and photos to smile and chuckle about. We are introducing a column on Lake Minnetonka bygone daj's. We believe it will be both educational and fun reading. Our staff cartoonist, David Gillette, has both talent and insight into the local issues on the lake. He is a student at Wesionka High School and a very talented young man. In addition to the committee reports on vital lakeshore owner issues, you have no doubt already enjoyed columns written by Pat McCollough. She has brought you news from the LMCD, Hennepin Water Patrol and she is a valuable volunteer who lives on the lake. Your opinion is important. We encourage you to write to the editor, in 150 words or less, for the editorial page, “Speak Out.” Please sign your letter and put a telephone number where you can be reached, so we can verify it. W ith a new format, more photos, cartoons and color, we pledge to bring you a most professional publication. If a suggestion or comment comes to mind, let us hear from you...472-9876. Speak Out To participate on the pagets) of Speak Out, the editorial section of the newsletter, please send your letter to LMLOA, Inc., Newsletter Editor, P.O. Box 596, Excelsior, MN 55331. Please keep your letter brief, 150 words. All submissions must have an address and telephone number, as well as the signature of the writer. We reser\’e the right to edit the submissions. Your letters will be published in the veiy ne.vt newsletter (check the subscription circulation months). All letters become property of LMLO.A. Where do \/ck \s^uppose ihose^ 4.L-, hiberrvo.fe^y I tt ^..Mei Page 4 On The J^ihe Spnng 199o The Steamboat is Coming! b\ Bob Wood burn The “crew” of the 1906 seventy-foot streetcar steamboat Minnehaha hoisted a “topping out' tjee to commemorate the replacement of the last of the /O ribs in the hull. The completion is a significant milestone. Over 30 volunteers have helped out regularly during the last vear working on this long task. Completing the rib replacement allows replanking of tne hull to con ­ tinue. This task is about 25‘3 complete. New ribs and planks have stabilized the hull such that installation of cribbing for the engine and boiler could start. Four twentv-one foot, 4d 0 pound beams will support the propulsion system and stiffen the hull. The engine is being readied for installation. A new boiler is on order. We plan to pull the boat out of the bam and install this equipment in August. The boat may then be put on display in Excelsior for Apple Days. Meanwhile, you all are invited to stop in and peek. Or, better yet, come lend a hand. Go five blocks west on George Street out of Excelsior and you will see our bam along the hilling trail. We work ever>- Wednesday night and Saturday morning. We ordered the boiler and now we have to hustle up the fund.'^ to pay for it So we are having a party, and vou are invited. Partygoers had a lot of fun last year and we think 1993 will be even better. This is your invitation. We think the Minnehaha restoration should appeal to all lakeshore owners. This is your chance to have some fun imd also provide some neces ­ sary financial support. For information about the Minnehaha restoration or the Lafayette party call one of the LMLOA members involved with the project: Leo Meloche (470-1770). Jim Ogland (471-9401), Bob Woodbum (474-4594). or Pete Weir (474-7474). (Glesne continued from page I) If you: 1. Appreciate the lake and all it has to offer; 2. Want to eradicate the milfoil infestation; 3. Want fairer property ta.\ action (tao reform'; 4. Want a sound and sensible lalie acc-es.^ program; 5. Want a safer and clean-.-r lake; 6. Want to have some control over the lake, and not to have all the decisions made by the politicians, the DNR. and t’ne LMCD; t'nen join LMlAhA and become an involved member. Besides paying your $25 dues, you can become involved in the membership, governmental, and com.munication committees on ycur local bay level. / i 1).i» I ?. v.| i'J.JPJ s’. N, ' Harlc\ Jones. Boh Torkclson. Sian Strain, Cliff Brandhorst m and Pete Weir, on hoard the Mirint^haha Steawoatin ’ i.\ Till; R0.4RII\G TW'EiVriES BAIVQUET L\F.'\VErTE CMIB • SILENT .‘\UCTIO.N • LIVE .AUCTION • RAFFLE PRIZES • RAGTIME PIANO • ENTERTAINME.NT • NAUTICAL ITEMS Friday l>Iay' 2 1 . IJW3 p.m. Silent Aiu liun - JWMl p.m. IMnncr Kt.\!SEK Fl’AK K.llSEIt "Minm -:hah .\ re.stor .\ti()N" 535 Per I’ersnn .MINNKSO rA TRAN.SPOKT.VnON .MLSia .M Mdil In: Har(»id Hanv.n 21.*' Karr) A\t. South Wu\/ata. MinruMiU 553'M I Spnnsr 1993 On Thi' I.akt'F’.u--.* LA/ILOA Welcomes 1993 Board of Directors 51-* - 'tk'A v'’' ^ 2L;r: • ■ ;.?: r,'-- •'Oifc^V- Front: Miles Conning, Presulent. Jennifer Dotzenroih. Vice President: Back: Kathy Pyatt. Secretary arui Galen Colz. Treasurer LMLOA Committee Coordinators I Alain Frecon, Leyal ......................................... Smith Bay j Tom Pokonosky. Tax....................................Carsons Bay Newell Weed, Tax ......................................... Browns Bay Second Annual LMLOA Planning Session held at Wayzata Yacht Club Four LMCD Boiu-d members introduced updated information on the e.xotic,:- exi.sting in ;uid lorthcoining to the lake, the Sonar project and boat ac 'ess. Ed Oliver, State Senator, District VI and Gen Olson, State Senator, District 34. brought the Board up to speed on tax issues and bills in the House and Senate that concern the western suburbs. Welcome to the new board: Miles Canning, Jennifer Dotzenroth, Cayien Goiz, Kathy Pyatt, Jane Best- Re gnier, Bev Bio mb erg, Ron Giesne, Robert Leighton, Jeff Magnuson, Caroie Munson, Steve Wood, and Robert Tomaika A w% ‘itFf:. ^ \ LMLOA Board meets with LMCD representatives Gene Strommen, James Grathwoi, Tom Penn atul Bert Foster at the annual planmmt session. We extend a Good-Bye... rhiuik you Lind Hood Luck to four former board me.mbers Fred Badiyan. Don Cuu imuKson. Marcia Michalik and Lee Ann Sanna. These people will continue to serve LMLO.A irom the ranks. Page 6 On The I.oke ■pring 1993 The 2nd Annual Minnetonka Memories by Jennifer Dotzenroth Tuesday Aujjust 10. 1903 Old Log Theater 4:00-10:00 p.m. Dinner Buffet The date is set and plans are well under way for this year ’s exciting party! Our theme will be centered around “Hotels on the Lake.” Minnetonka was known as the tourist spot of the rich and tamous m the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. We have several interesting historians lined up for the story panel, which will again prove to be an outstanding part of the evening. Many folks liave iilready contacted us requesting space to exhibit their historicjil wares of yester year! Donation If 2'ou have a slide projector and/ or projection screen you wish to donate to the LMLOA, please call our hot line at 472-9876. Are you creative... organized and willing to help the environment? Why not be our next newsletter editor? If you are interested, please call our LMLOA Hotline at 472-9876. Also... •Just as we publicize LMLO.A activities, we would be glad to help promote local community programs and activities. The LMLOA would help sponsor ;uiy event or project that will benefit the 14-city L;ike .Minnetonka Community. Call the LMLOA Hotline at 473-987(5. ■N T’ae Social Committee is thrilled with the level of enthusiasm for this year ’s event. We ime looking forwiu-d to an even better party this yeai- with new ideas and events combined to make what was a great pirnty last yeiu* — SUPERB this yeiu'! Advertising will be off the press late in Niay. We would gladly accept help from any members who would be willing to place these posters and brochures throughout the local area businesses and public establishments. We also intend to do a large mailing in July. For those of you who have ever pimticipated in a large mailing, you know the hours/days of work that are involved. Please contact us at 472-9876 if you are willing to offer some time. Watch the local papers and next newsletter for more details. Tennis Anyone? by Jennifer Dotzenroth Mark your calendars for July 4th. The LMLOA, in conjunction with Burnet Realty, will be sponsor ­ ing the First Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association Fourth of July Tennis Tournament. If you would like to participate in the planning stages or are inter­ ested in playing in the event itself, give us a call at 472-9876. Watch for further details in community news­ papers, local businesses and sport ­ ing goods stores! Loon Siting! The Loon VValch Program reported that .six looas were seen at the Areola Bridge on April 14. I Spring 1993 On The Lake Page Bygone Days on Lake Minnetonka bv Lee Ann Sanna Did ycu know that in the 1850’s the property on and around Lake Minnetonka was going for $1.25 an acre? Most folks bought 160 acres (that was $200 for prime lakeshore) for farming. In accordance to the law at that time, they had to clear one acre of land to show they were serious about homesteading and not just speculating. After clearing the acre of land, they would use the timber to build a 20’ by 20’ structure for their home, using greased paper for window panes. These homes cost the western suburb owners about $5.00 to build. The large island in lower Lake Minnetonka known as Big Island today, was first named for Judge B. B. Meeker (Meeker Island). He was among the observation party in the late 1790 ’s that included Governor Alexander Ramsey and Col. J. H. Stevens. In 1854, William B. Morse located on the island. He had obtained a title of the U.S. (Govern­ ment to the island. William’s brother, John, owned the western side of the isl.tnd, while il- liam owned the eastern side, a larger portion. Thus, the island was called Morse’s Island. William Morse married Anne Francis Mason on June 8, 1856. They lived on Morse’s Island. Anne was Deephaven’s first school teacher and William would barge his cows across the bay for summer pasture. During his 92 years, William B. Morse had become a jack-of-all-trades. He was a farmer, a silversmith, a blacksmith and stiu-ted an ice busi­ ness. In 1921, William B. Morse died and “his part” of the island became the amusement park and eventually as it is known today, the Veteran’s Camp. Information courtesy of: Hennepin County Pioneer Museum, Long Lake, Minnesota. •KH * i } - V William B. Morse Anne Francis Mason MiO ^e *V.i c. m: Page »Oft The Lakr Spring Lakewatch Has Begun by Kathx Pyatt EmvirommentiMi Cdmcatiom ComBmittrer The LMLOA is in The Spotlight April 17.1993 was the kick-ofT date of the Lake Water Quality Meaiitorinf IVofram. A representa­ tive flrooi each bay in Lake Minnetonka will be veluntefrinf their time each week to collect informa­ tion to be entered into a data baae at the Fresh' ater Foundation. The Tonka Bay Marina and Minnetonka Boat Works, along with the LMCD, are the Anancial hacksrs to get this preyect going. The LMLOA has fecruitsd the Lakewatchers. We are pleased to hare been instrumental in this group effort to save the lake. Watch for your bay representative at work and more updates on the You can tune into three area community cable sutions at six difforent times each week and see the LMLOA talk 9h<m, Lak0 Ccmmtry Cmr^ rtniM, This new talk show is an exciting, informative half-hour program that includes local evenu, historical recall, environ­ mental and political topics. Clem Birch and Kathy f^att are co­ hosts of the riiow. Their inter­ views with local and regional guests bring a light and intemting perspective. Check your area newspaper for day and time. .•r-i f-r: ■Property Tax Update byStmtil Weed and Tom i*okono»k\ A recent property tax survey conducted Ity your LMLOA produced some startling results. Theques- tiods LMLOA Memberahlp Imeey 1. Whedperteni of yamr income goee toward the payment of yamr property taxeet SL Bow tong have you lived in your hornet It’s gttite apparent from the results of the survey chronided in the accompanying chart, that longtime rssidsats and/or retirees are hurt the most, with many forced to move from their homes because they cannot afford their property taxes. The ordi recumed confirm that a rmifi iflW to MW of lammm has been paid for propigty team by -MLOA umbsri - with 62^ of tho« rMpanding iiceefong fW of their income in taxes. Your Tax Committee is working with the cur* ent legi slators to have a bill passed m this —eien hat would act aa a positive circuit breaker and allow efiinds of tax payments over a certain partont of ncomo for long-term homeowners who are faced with •tfiMing market values and lowered retirement in- omsa. This property tax refund plnn v ould impact not nly a significani number of nvr l.MLOA members 1 Iteit %el ataL CMdi fnmm rmtta fomn 1 0-1 M 31 400 7JI 1 tMD 43 33 m 12J3 1 10.120 32 24 13.0f 1M7 1 20.1-30 2 2 2S.OO MJO 301 •4 3 3S.2S ».oe Tom iitsoasit 131 100 but also many thousands of senior taxpayers state­ wide that are caught in the present regressive tax formula. We still need further names and letters or cards from those adversely affected for our legislative ac­ tion program. Please call our hotline at 472*9676, or your tax chairs to help us help you and others. /• A-, ■4 ii'* - I v’.-.'i "^1 4m Spring 1993 On The Lake rayv y J Current Contributors Helm • ($100 or more) Navigator - ($25 or more) Bruce/Martha Atwater .............................Browne Bay Jim Cargill...........................................Wayzata Joe Carlson............................. Smithtown Bay Steva/Kathy Curry ...................... Upper South Lawrence DeWin ................... Smithtown Bay John/Jean Folin....................................Carmans Bay Terry/Kathie Forbord...................................Echo Bay Jim/Kathy Gray ............................... Priest Bay James Grierson .............................Jennings Bay BradGruss ............................. Smithtown Bay Richard Hanson...................... Smithtown Bay Robert Hegstrom ................... Smithtown Bay Brian Jackson ....................................Cooks Bay Pat/Marcia Kranz ........................ Upper South Thomas Lowe ..............................Lafayette Bay Robert MacDonald .........................Gideons Bay John Moe ..................................................Upper West Carole Munson..........................................Phelps Bay John Nagel ...................................Jennings Bay Steve/Joan Nielsen ........................Carmans Bay Doug/Rita Podolak ............................ St Albans Harry/Thelma Pulver ......................Carmans Bay Tom/Lynne Rendahl ........................Upper West Steve/Nancy Ritchie .....................Lafayette Bay Roger/Carol Rovick........................ Northhome Yale Smiley ...................................Carmans Bay William Smith ....................... Smithtown Bay Douglas/Ann Sweet ......................Halstead Bay David Weiner ....................... Smithtwown Bay Robert White .............................................Smith Bay William Spoor .................................Browns Bay BUSINESS MEMBERS 550-0031 473-3000 471-8476 471-8476 T. Bryce & Associates .......................... 16828 Grays bay Blvd, Wayzata Burnet Realty ......................................... 315 E Lake Street. Wayzata Carlson Companies ............................... 12755 Highway 55. Plymouth 754-5705 Fresiv.yater Harvesting ........................................................................................................ 13208 Gladiola St NW, Coon Rapids Gray Freshwater Biological Institute ......... 2500 Shadywood Road. Navarre 475-2824 Groveland Homeowners Association.................................................................................. 17700 Front St. Wayzata Hour Glass Cleaners ................. 426 Lake St. Excelsior 474-9595 Huber Funeral Home ............................................................................................................. 520 Second Street. Excelsior 471-8493 Lafayette Club...................................................................................................................... 2800 Northvlew Rd, Minnetonka Beach Lord Retcher's .................................................. 3746 Sunset Drive. Spring Park 473-1232 Lundgren Brothers Homes ................................................................................................... 935 E. Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata 474-9454 Minnetonka Portable Dredging ............................................................................................ 500 W Lake Street. Excelsior 474-5500 471-8513 ■i. v-v.- • - -r Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association P.O. Box 696 Excelsior, MN 55331 Phone 472-9876 Do Not Forward Address Correction Requested Return Postage Guaranteed m Membership Expr Non Orono City Council PO Box 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 LMLOA Income Statement 1/1/93 through 3/31/93 INCOME; Membership Fees Business Members Donations from Members $6,935.00 150.00 835 00 EXPENSES: Administration Communty Education Membership Newsletter Operating Social $625.00 $1,370.00 120.00 159.19 1,335.42 1,408.10 1,541.26 243.23 TOTAL EXPENSES $6,178.07 NET INCOME/(Loss)$1,741.93 BULK RATE POSTAGE PAID excelsior. MN Ptrmit No. 108 i S ll •Tf- % :A 0 w -->1 ■M CELEBRATE 3rd Anniversary TAMARACK SENIOR CENTER and MAY BIRTHDAYS THURSDAY, MAY 13 atHoon MENU: Ham loaf, swaat potatoM, marinatod eucumbar auprama aalad, braad/buttar, eaka and lea eraam, eoffaa and milk.« 1 ENTERTAINMENT: Dalano Sanlor SIngara PRIZES WSVT> Iw TVi«aJ«v. Mav 11 at 476-2554 '•a Vbn transportation available TAMARACK SENIOR CENTER Community Room of Church of St George 133 South Brown Road, Long Lake 476>2554 4 ''ij Serving communities of Long Lake, Mediiut Orono and Wayzata i u- If r- i-j r: '• ■ -i' -i' I fc-fe' Mhs. ■f, I . HENNEPIN COMMUNITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Health Services Building - Level 3 525 Portland Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 i MAY 5 *• ^*c A . V ' 4* - DATE: April 28. 1993 TO:Persons Interested in Community Health Services (CHS) in Hennepin County PROM:Sue Zuidema, Director Community Health Department SUBJECT: Planning Process FOr the 1994-1995 CHS Plan Update The Hennepin County Community Health Department has initiated Its planning prooess for completion of the 1994-1995 Community Health Senrices Plan Update. As a local board of health, Hennepin County, through its Community Health Department, has been receiving State CHS hinds for eligtole community health services since 1977. Funding is based on tmo year plans approved by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and the Minnesota Department of Health. The major steps involved include: 1. Assessing progress towards reaching the goals and objectives contained in the 1992-1995 Hennepin County CHS Plan. 2. Updating and reviewing community health services problems/needs and priorities. 3. Proposing and reviewing program plans for 1994 and 1995, and 4. Determining program and CHS budget priorities. Preliminary plans will be developed and available for public review by July 15. 1993. Currently, copies of the Hennepin County 1992-1995 CHS Plan are available for public review at the following locations: Broohdale-Hennepin Area Library Information Services Desk 6125 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center. MN 55439 Rkfgedale Lforary Information Services Desk 12601 Ridgedale Drive Minnetonka, MN 553^ (over) HENNEPIN COUNTY on equol opportunity twiploytf - I 1 nmiS [Memo RE: 1994-1995 CHS Planning Process Page 2 Southdale-Hennepin Area Library Information Services Desk 7001 York Avenue South Edina. MN 55435 Minneapolis Central Library Government Documents 300 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis. MN 55401 Public hearings will be held in conjunction with regularly scheduled meetings of the advisory committees of the five CHS agencies in Hennepin County. They are tentatively scheduled for: Date: July 19, 1993 Time: 7:00 P.M. Host: Richfield Advisory Board of Health Location: Richfield City Hall (Large Conference Room). 6700 Portland Avenue South For Additional Information Contact: Betsy Christensen at 861-9881 Date: August 17, 1993 Time: 7:00 P.M. Host: Minneapolis Public Health Advisory Committee Location: Sabathani Community Center (Room D2), 310 East 38th Street For Additional Information Contact: Jerry Thelen at 673-3798 or Mary Manning at 673-3009 Date: August 16. 1993 Time: 11:00 A.M. Host: Hennepin County Community Health Senrices Advisory Committee Location: Health Services Building (Room To Be Determined). 525 Portland Avenue South For Additional Information Contact: Jim Mara at 348-3969 or Monica Sausen at 348-3906 Date: August 24, 1993 Time: 7:30 P.M. Host: City of Bloomington Advisory Board of Health Location: BkMmington City Council Chambers. 2215 West Old Shakopee Road For Additional Information Contact: Roz Johnson or Gayle Hallin at 887-9603 Date: August 25, 1993 Time: 7:30 P.M. Host: Edina Community Health Board Location: Edina City Hall. 4801 West 50th Street For Additional information Contact: David Velde at 927-6861 •r.- F.’ ■[-yI I 1^.. r: 4, V ■ f"Vh. w. TO*Mayor and City Council FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATS:May 6, 1993 SUBJBCT: Update on In Process Activities The following is an update on the status of a number of items on which staff has been working. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. HRA ratification of Council actions related to the city facilities. This has been completed. gay access. The Lake Use Committee prepared a report ligting concerns and issues related to the DNR's concept plan for the public access. The Committee met with the DNR to discuss the report and the concept plan on April 14. The Dm ^gg in agreement with most of the items in the report. The DNR is preparing a revised plan in response to the Committee's report. Spring newsletter. The newsletter has been completed and mailed to all Orono residents. Supplemental sick leave policy. The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed policy. The Attorney has indicated the general policy makes sense from an employment law perspective and suggested a number of language changes. Staff will revise the policy in response to the Attorney's suggestions and will bring the revised policy to the Council for approval. Architect reimbursable expenses. Staff has sent a letter to the architect indicating the reimbusable expenses are beyond both the amount anticipated and the amount generally incurred in a project such as the city facilities project. The letter also indicates the higher level of expenditures were caused by the way in which the architect handled the project. The letter indicates the amount the city is willing to pay is substantially less than the amount billed, and requests that a meeting be scheduled to work out an acceptable amount. Staff will be meeting with the architect the week of May 17 to resolve the reimbursable expense issue. Legal services. Staff met with the City Attorney on March 25 to discuss service and fee levels as a first step in working toward an agreement for 1993. Two major items discussed were: items to be included in the retainer, and the dual fee schedule that charges a much higher "private" rate for work on planning applications. The retainer fee is currently billed at $1,100 per month. This will include attendance at council meetings and phone calls from the City Administrator and Department Heads. <1 itli m- y. '- 0 m wmm m '■'hm V;. . KgSr*!.ife-.'^.r 8. 9. Staff has indicated to the Attorney that the practice of billing at the private rate for work for which the cost is passed on to a private payor (such as review of Planning Commission applications) is of major concern. The Attorney has indicated he will look into changing this practice. The Attorney has not responded concerning the private rate issue. When this response is received staff will bring a report to either a Council meeting or a vrork session to review the legal services proposal. Stubbs Bay sewer project. The installation of all sewer lines is completed except portions of laterals serving two homes. One is a short stretch of lateral off Bederwood that crosses DNR owned property. The city is waiting to receive a permit/easement from the DNR before proceeding with construction. The second is the lateral that crosses the Pidgeon property that will serve the Use property. The contractor plans to begin to prepare for the street paving portion of the project next %#eek - weather permitting. Plans are to complete the paving by the end of June. Staff is proceeding with the quick take process for acquiring the easement across the Pidgeon property. Staff has also responded to the Pidgeon's initial proposal regarding the value of the easement. Staff is hopeful that the easement value can be negotiated rather than having to continue through the condemnation process. Ten^rary traffic signal at Willow and Highway 12. The City Engineer had investigated the possibility of the City moving ahead with a traffic signal independent of MnDOT's planned safety inqprovements. Although the traffic signal itself could be affordable« the traffic channelization improvements at the intersection %#ould be very costly ($200,000). Although NnDOT does provide a funding mechanism for cities who decide to move ahead with a project on a faster time line than HnDOT's plans, this is only done when MnDOT supports the city's plans and believes the project will conplement the future NnDOT project. In this case MnDOT believes the channelization improvements will have to be redone when the safety improvement project is constructed. For this reason MnDOT is not willing to provide funding for the channelization improvements in advance of their safety improvement project. Staff will continue to %#ork with MnDOT to move up the time line of the safety inqprovements project. Long Lake fire contract. The city has now received two sets of information from the City of Long Lake regarding the financial operation of the fire department. Councilmember Kelley will be providing a report to the Council regarding his analysis of the information. Councilmember Kelley and the City Administrator will met with Long Lake Councilmember Jim Hartfiel and Mayor Olson on May 18 to discuss fire department operations. 1 U- 1 I 'i -'5I I V ■ .t-^fm^.- m ■vS**.! :^'V. m '1?* U ; ,''?■ ;;-'v.. % r|Tr.>' ■ mm^y mS0 ;V '■ * I- l!5"In • W ; i.. ■ I:,- 10.Police contract. Staff is meeting on a monthly basis with the City of Spring Park to discuss and resolve issues related to the police contract. Staff will be meeting with the City of Long Lake for a similar meeting later this month. 11.Sump pump inspection ordinance. Staff will complete the following tasks in the next two weeks. a.)Identify those areas of the city where the most illegal code connections are most likely to be found. b.) Identify any areas where the elimination of illegal connections could lead to recjuests for storm sewer projects. c.)Determine how many homes would be included in each priority area. d.)Determine the number of staff hours required to conduct the inspections in each of the priority areas. This information will be used to develop a draft proposal if^cgarding an inspection program. The proposal would identify costsf concerns and potential problem areas of an inspection program. 12.Long Lake Fleming Trail subdivision/annexation issues. The final item remaining in the subdivision process was the Met Council's review of the Comp Plan Amendment to extend the MUSA line. The Met Council has now approved the Comp Plan Amendment. The Comp Plan Amendment was to be placed on the May 10 Council agenda, however, the City had not received the formal letter of approval from the Met Council when the agenda was being prepared. The letter of approval has now been received by the City. Both the Comp Plan Amendment and the Fleming Trail subdivision will be placed on the May 24th Council agenda. 13.Extension of the Crystal Bay Post Office lease. The postal service has proposed a 5 year lease at the current rental rate. The Council has directed staff to review the lease rate to determine if it is possible to increase the lease amount. Staff will provide information on comparable lease rates to Council at the May 10 meeting. 14.Public/Private roads. Staff is preparing a report to the Council to provide information to assist the Council in addressing the issues related to public versus private responsibility for maintenance of roads within the city. The report will include the following information: a.) An inventory of privately maintained roads. b.) A map of all streets in the city coded according to whether they are publicly or privately maintained. \ fife .■^J... £:feHfe IV PCjr'S-# ' E#®'fern*■siK'SVt:'-. sisfekS'"*-'- c.) The range of maintenance activities the city performs on public roadb.d.)Information on the impact on work load and service levels of adding more miles of streets to the maintenance responsibilities. e.)Information on alternative processes and criteria for transferring roadways from private to pxiblic responsibi1ity. 15.New water tower and water agreement with Long Lake. The city's new water tower came on line in March. This meant the city no longer needed to use the Long Lake system to serve the Highway 12 area of the city. The city has worked with the City of Long Lake to restructure the former water sharing agreement into a reciprocal water sharing agreement by «diich each city %iould agree to provide water to the other city in a time of an emergency or when maintenance to one of the systems requires the system to be off line. A proposed agreement has been drafted and reviewed by the City Attorney. All substantive issues have been agreed upon between the t«fO cities. Several language changes are still being worked out. Once these changes are made the agreement will be brought to the Council for review and approval. tttaafltfife mtiiamiaam m f. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT May 5, 1993 TO: PROM: LMCD Member Cities Administrator/Contact Person Executive Director Gene Strommei^i^^^^^JlSrVw/*^ SUBJECT:Assessment of Environment Committee Objectives and Determination of Priorities The first anniversary Environment Committee for May 11 per the enclosed meeting agenda. Vf ^t in April when the progress notice was participating cities, agencies and groups. Hurr, Orono, is anxious to start Ti22ti?M^progress toward your lake’s Management Plan s objectives. The principal purpose “*y.}Jof th« obJ«ctiv6S identified in the Lncp Hana««Miit Plan for Lake Minnetonka. JJeao highlighted in the attached agenda. All of them have is»3 start dates or on-going time frames. It appeara that some of theae objectives needamaller and more achieveable units. The bt~ad nature of the objective lends itself to taking this step. !!• are^looking <vr guidelines as well as specifics. May we count C' halving you or your designated ^thSdaSTthi. Tueaday at B»00 am? W. »U1 meeting by 9:30 am so you can plan your time accoraingu Refreshments will be provided to sustain your energies! Thank you for participating in this exchange.i 1 1S«® ] .^1 i A m % LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Environment Committee Agenda 8:00 am, Tuesday, May 11, 1993 Norwest Bank Bldg. Conference Rm 135, Hayzata 1. Welcome and introductions. Chair JoEllen Hurr 2. Review and acceptance of 3/9/93 minutes as mailed 3.Lakewatch water monitoring update following the April 17 "Spring Starter" meeting -- review of Lakewatch volunteer procedures, committee questions Kathy Pyatt and JoEllen Hurr "Workshop Discussion" concerning current Management Plan objectives, identifying near and extended term means to achieve them among the lead and cooperating vf** introduced to the Environment Committee May 12, ijji i •- Establish benchmark water quality assessment criteria & standards for surface waters tributary to the lake Lead/Co'op Agency MCHD & LMCD Reduce or tie up phosphorus in sediments of lake areas where needed to prevent reuse in aquatic vegetative growth cycle. MCHD Complete comprehensive survey of all wetlands in shoreland zones. MCWD & HCO Agencies that control land in shoreland zones to establish criteria to manage runoff consistent with MCWD 509 Plan 6 DNR standards. DNR, HCD, MCHD Complete, adopt local water management plans consistent with MCWD 509 Plan cities & MCHD 5, Conclusions and recoimnendations; 6. Next meeting date; LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Environment Committee Minutes 8:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 9, 1993 Norw«iSt Bank Bldg. Conference Room Present Chair JoEllen Hurr, Orono; Dave Cochran, Greenwood; Ann Conrad, Freshwater Foundation; Frank Kelly, Greenwood; Carolyn Dindorf, Hennepin Conservation District; Kathleen Pyatt, LMLOA; Ed Fick, DNR; Gene Strommen, LMCD Executive Director Chair Hurr opened the meeting at 8:10 a.m. MINUTES: The committee accepted the 1/12/93 minutes. PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROHIBITING USE OF NON-ENCASED MOLDED EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE FLOTATION MATERIAL: Hurr reported the approval of Ordinance 122 by the LMCD Board on 2/24/93. The ordinance prohibits the use of non~encased molded expanded polystyrene foam material in any water structures. Uses in both docks and mooring buoys is prohibited after 4/15/95. LAKEWATCH WATER MONITORING: Forty sites have been designated from which to gather information. Kathy Pyatt announced April 17 as the "Spring Starter" meeting for all Lakewatch Program participants. Monitoring techniques will be reviewed. Volunteers will receive a reporting procedures manual that will be explained by Ann Conrad . The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District collects rain and runoff information to the state according to Dave Cochran. Lakewatch should coordinate with the MCWD. SHORELINE ORDINANCE ADOPTION; Ed Fick, DNR Shoreline Hydrologist, gave historical information about the regulation of surface waters from land use going back to 1969. He carried the discussion forward to the 1989 DNR Shoreland Rules. These rules are now being developed into ordinances by the 14 cities around Lake Minnetonka. Flexibility requests for impervious cover due to a high degree of exu?ting development have been among the greatest need of some cities as they prepare to adopt their new ordinances. Storm water runoff from highly developed areas have a significant influence on water quality. Storm water management plans are being required in exchange for flexibility to allow greater impervious cover for redevelopment projects. Fick noted that the MCWD 509 Plan and stormwater districts will be the next step for improving lake water quality. ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE, Minutes, 3/9/93, P. 2 WATER QUALITY GOAL: The committee is still considering the water quality goals for Lake Minnetonka. What are the required standards? What are the parameters? How can we toward a desired end result? LMCD, the Watershed District and the Freshwater Foundation will begin identifying agencies that can assist in solving lake use problems. Kathy Pyatt is producing a cable TV feature on protecting the lake. She invited others on the committee to join her, and suggested holding a panel discussion. MANAGEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVE TO REGULATE MARINE DISPOSAL: Staff asked the committee for direction on how it might evaluate the use and disposal of fluids such as anti-freeze, motor oils, and gasolines at commercial docks and marinas. Who regulates the installations handling sewage pump out was also questioned. The committee will address these questions with staff during the interim. NEXT MEETING AND ADJOURNMENT. The next meeting was set for 8:00 am, Tuesday, April 13. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 am. Respectfully submitted, Eugene R. Strommen Executive Director To: From: Date: Mayor Callahan and Oiono Ccuncilinembers Ron Moorse. Ciiy Administrator f May 7, 1993 L*- // Subject: Sale of the Sewer Plant Property Attachment: April 22, 1993 Memo: Sewer Plant Property Subdivision Update #. The City has recently been approached by an individual very interested in purchasing the six-acre portion of the sewer plant property that is southeast of the lift station (the Oak Knoll area) to be used as the site for one house and guest house. The potential buyer has indicated he is willing to pay the appraised value of the property and possibly a higher price if the City believes the value is higher than the appraisal indicates. He has indicated he is ready to present a purchase agreement to the City. He has also indicated he is not represented by a realtor so that there would be no commission paid. Staff has indicated that prior to responding to any offers on the property the City would need to update the appraisal of the property and would need to determine a process for selling the property, that would meet legal requirements and ensure the City obtains the best price for the property. From a legal standpoint, the sale process needs to ensure that the sale price is based on the appraised value. Beyond that requirement there is no specific process required. However, it is important that the process be carried out in a way that ensures the citizens the City used due care in obtaining the best price for the property. The potential buyer has suggested that the City simply negotiate a price with him based on the updated appraisal and any other indications of value available to the City. A more open and competitive process is to accept sealed bids on the property, with the value the City wants from the property being set as the lowest acceptable bid. Staff has contacted the appraiser regarding updating the appraisal. She has indicated she will not be able to complete the update until the end of May. Staff will try to meet with the appraiser as soon as possible to review the initial appraisal and to get a ballpark indication of the current value of the property based on the proposed subdivision and use of the property r'i TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Administrator DATE: April 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Sewer Plant Property Subdivision Update As part of the new city facilities budget process the cost of the land for the facilities site was partially offset by the sale of two city owned properties. One was the Crystal Bay City Hall site the other was the former sewer plant property off Old Crystal Bay Road. The projected revenue from the sale of these properties was $35,000 and $150,000 respectively. The following is an update regarding the potential sale of the sewer plant property. The Park has lecommended that the property containing the former sewer ^nd and the open area north of the MWCC lift station (a total of approximately 30 acres) be retained for park use; and that the 6 acres to the southeast of the lift stotion (the oak knoU area) be subdivided for residential development. The Planning Commission has recommended that the entire sewer plam property be retained by the city for open spacc/park use. The City Council has directed staff to proceed to investigate subdividing the property to create two residential lots in the southeast portion of the property. Staff has analyzed the southeast portion of the property to determine how best to subdivide it in order to the city’s investment in improvements, maximize revenue generated, and minimis the Impact of the resi»teiitial development. This analysis has indicated the optim^ alternative is to create one residential lot using the total six acre parcel. This would provide revenue in excess of the $150,0(X) originally projected from the sale of the e^ sew« pl^ ty. while not requiring any Impioveiiients by the city. Staff has arranged to have the site to determine whether there is adequate on>site septic capacity. LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE Meeting Notice and Agenda 7:00 pm, Wednesday, May 12, 1993 Norwest Bank Bldg. Conference Room 135, Waysata (Handicapped entrance, Wayzata Blvd. west entry) (Please note location) 1. Welcome, role call of designated Task Force spokespersons and guest introductions. Chair Grathwol 2. Access Site Subcommittee report on Potential Access Sites as evaluated per Access Site Evaluation Criteria, chair John Schneider; Discussion and Task Force recommendation for cont'.nuing the access siting process, and recommendations for any further subcommittee evaluation of the potential sites. 3. Progress report on Car/Trailer Parking Agreements with cities, Hennepin County; 4. Additional business; 5. Next meeting; 6. Adjournment fo"''D MAY T 1993 LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE Access Siting Subcommittee Minutes 7:00 pm, Tuesday, May 4, 1993 LMCD Conference Room 160, Norwest Bank Bldg., Wayzata Present:Chair John Schneider, MSC; LATF Chair Jim Grathwol LMCD Board, Excelsior; Mayor Nick Duff, Woodland; Gordon Kimball, Mike Markell, DNR Trails & Waterways, Executive Jirector Gene Strommen; Lakeshore owners from Libbs Lake area POTENTIAL PUBLIC ACCESS SITE REVIEW PER ELEVEN SITES SELECTED FROM POTENTIAL ACCESS SITE LIST OF 4/93. Chair Schneider opened the meeting acknowledging the presence of some 30 persons representing homeowners in and around the Libbs Lake area, Minnetonka. The homeowners came to present their case for not having a public boat access on Libbs Lake. Grathwol reviewed the history of the Lake Access Task Force and how it was given the charge, among others, to examine potential access sites on Lake Minnetonka as part of the plan to provide 700 car/trailer parking spaces for public use. Schneider then explained the criteria to be used in evaluating potential public access sites. The Libbs Lake people had already received a copy of the criteria. They did their Libbs Lake evaluation. Terry Nura, 3035 Lakeshore Blvd, Minnetonka, presented copies to the subcommittee members. Schneider agreed to take their written evaluation into consideration as the Libbs Lake site was evaluated by subcommittee members. Schneider also pointed out that the Libbs Lake property was put on the potential site list because it had been offered to the Lake Access Task Force as "for sale" for possible lake access purposes. As such it was included for evaluation. Tom Ki::. Ivjr, 16609 Park La., and Greg Kitchak, 16912 Grays Bay Blvd., also spoke in opposition to ♦‘he access possibilities as did other members of the group stating similar concerns. POTENTIAL ACCESS SITE PROCEDURE AND REVIEW. Subcommittee members agreed to use a ranking system for each of the ten criteria ranging the site for each criteria from Bad , "Poor", "Neutral", "Good" and "Very Good". Comments specific to a particular site were also noted. The ranking outcome is summarized on the attached report. This report submitted to the Lake Access Task Force at its 5/12 meeting. CONSIDERATIONS IN DEALING WITH POTENTIAL ACCESS SITES. Three points were reiterated for public understanding in dealing with potential access sites: ACCESS SITING SUBCOMMITTEE, Minutes, 5/4/93, P 1) All sites must have willing sellers 2) City cooperation in advancing the access must be secured 3) Agency cooperation must also be secured in advance a site MARINAS AS POTENTIAL ACCESS SITES. Marinas, removed from the potential access site list, will be considered separately.^ Subcommittee concurred that marinas should be examined tor. 1) Potential use of extending existing capacity. 2) Extent to which the marina already serves the public for fee paid access. 3) Attitude of nearby homeowners for public access use. 4) Considering any public access use as a temporary trial. 5) Management issues such as how public parking/launch space would be reserved and accounted for in a mix ot fee-paid launch service. , , j 6) MN DNR budget constraints in annual funding leased space NEW POTENTIAL ACCESS SITE. Doll Haugen, 16930 Grays Bay Blvd., Minnetonka, asked the subcommittee s consideration ot a potential public access site she envisions could serve the public as a multiple-use site, including park purposes. The site identified is the Sweat family estate on the northwest corner of Grays Bay, Wayzata, bordering about .7 of a mile on lolTty Hwy. iSl. The site is estimated at 70 or more acres. The site size was initially addressed. Its use for public purposes would more likely fall in the category of a park. Subcommittee members did not believe it appropriate to open a discussion on public use with a narrow focus of an access site. Rather it believed a park use would be more fitting for any public use. If such consideration were given to this property, then a public access might be considered as p a multiple use park facility. Haugen was thus . pursue her interest with the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District by contacting the park superintendent. volLteered to make a contact with the park superintendent. LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE AGENDA. The agenda for the 5/12/93 meeting was discussed. The subcommittee recommended the following^agenda^pri^^ Subcommittee report on potential access sites B. Status of marinas for participating in car/trailer parking and free public access C. Agreements report for cities, county on / NEXT MEETING, ADJOURNMENT. The subcommittee concurred it woUd look the Task Force for further direction. The meeting adjourned at 10:35 pm. Reject ful Ix^ubmitted Eugei^TR* Strommen Executive Director LAKE MINNETONKA 1993 ACCESS SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA The Task Force has developed evaluation criteria which should be used in selecting potential g^to^meet^the highestsmall recreation boats. While it may be impossible to meet the nignesc grading of each standard, the following should be and graded. Other evaluation items may be considered on a si specific basis. a site and nearby homes, screening the site from homes, noise, traffic, etc. 2 Accessibility to primary highways — Potential sites "ear major highways (State Highways 7 and 101, Safety-examoles) to reduce traffic impact on residential streets. Safety on site?\in .. ngrnrr tn both* shall be graded. 3 Public use precedent - Sites which are already in public ownership public facilities or services have been provided and accepted. A Intensity of boating use near a potential access site sections whLe there is intense boating, or crowding in channels, should be downgraded. 5. cost — Property acquisition, development and maintenance costs must be considered. usable. 7. Visual impacts - Positive and negative visual impacts as seen from land and water. 8. f„r (-he site — Sites that could provide Multiple use ?er%ishing, picnic areas, andfacilities such as shore fishing, pier risniny, toilers' eti., along with boat access are preferred. 9. Site size - Larger sites with off-street parking are preferred. 10. Environmental considerations related to dredging, fill, run-off control, wetlands, preservation, etc. irittes’Shall not be excluded because there is limited access for 2. s"es wu“be preferred that provide equitable distribution. ADOPTED: March 18, 1993 . Recommended for deleUon by Access Siting Subco»»lttee. covered In Item 4 FINAL ELEVEN POTENTIAL PUBLIC ACCESS SITE EVALUATION Access Siting Subcommittee. May 4, 1 993 POTENTIAL SITiT Tonka Bay City Dock >1< Very good >2< Very good >3< Very gooc EVALUATION CRITERIA >4< >5< >6< Neu- Good Good tral V.G. >7< Very good >8< Neu­ tral >9< Neut Good >10< ./ Neu­ tral Timber Good/Very Neut./ Good Neu­Unkn.Unkn.Neu­Unkn Unkn • Lane Area Shwood. V.G.good Good tral tral Mai Tai Excel. Neut./ V.G. Very good Good Poor Neu­ tral Very good Good/ V.G. Poor Very good Very good RDP Partners Sp. Pk. Drop -- undesirable to further expand Spring Park access 456 Arl. Av. Ways. Good Very good Good Good Good Very good Very good Neu­ tral Good Very good 3064-71 Lksh Blvd Libbs Lk Bad/ Poor Poor Poor Bad Poor Bad Neu­ tral Good Neu­ tral Good Pelican Point, Mnd Sp.Pk.Bay Good • Good Bad Good Poor Unkn.Poor/ Neut. Good/ V.G. Very good Neu­ tral Lost Lake Cooks Bay Mound Very good Very good Very good Good Good Neu­ tral Very good Poor Neu­ tral Poor Molly's Corner Drop -•- land no longer available • Advance Machine Very good Very good Very good Good Neu­ tral Neu­ tral Good Good Very good Very good Sp. Pk. Interlachen Av. Res. Area Drop - LaPayette Bay - residential area not meeting review criteria ##« Descriptive ranking — Very good. most favorable for access use« to Bad. least favorable for public access use. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ACCESS REVIEW CRITERIA DETAIL, ITEMS 1 TO 10 David R. Landswerk, Ph. 0. Suparinttndeni ol Schools <612) 476-3101 April 26, 1993 Dear Conununity Leader: The CosuDunl^y Leaders' Forum held on February 23 was very successful in gat.herin9 information and exchanging viewpoints on future community space needs. The approach taken at the meeting was an attempt to facilitate planning and^ thinking about future space needs comprehensively/ from a community perspective/ rather than in more traditional compartmentalized ways of the past. The ideas that surfaced in the discussions were encouraging/ and suggest that coordinated planning and cooperative development are both wanted and needed. The discussions also pointed up the fact that school facilities play an integral role in the provision of community space needs. The Board of Education/ with input from the Administration, Staff, Parents and Students, is in the process of addressing fundamental decisions on a future secondary level facility. The initial driving force is, and must be, sound educational policy for development and delivery of the educational program. These decisions will be made in the next couple of months. Yet the Board fully understands that the new school facility will be a Community facility as well. The final configuration of the building, and options for collaboration with other governmental and community organizations, will be explored as we develop formal plans and specifications for the new facility. A special task force will formulate a community involvement process to recommend to the Board of Education that will assure broad community input and open communication as this important and exciting community project takes shape. We look forward to working with you. Dr. David R. Landswerk Superintendent of Schools cc: P. Landry J. Brandi MAY 7 19» OMrfet AdmInittfattM Olllew 210 County Rood 101 Hortit RO- k n OtO Woy uf. UN SSStl-fftO FAX 47I-3214 A SUMMARY OP THE COMMUNITY LEADER'S FORUM ON SPACE Held February 23, 1993 SPEAKERS: Eric BlanX, City of Plymouth: Plymouth has 55,000 people living in 35 square miles with 4 school districts represented within its boundaries. The projected population for the year 2000 is 80-85,000. There has been rapid growth in the number of parks, sports and programs offered by the city which in turn requires increased use of space. Critical space needs are in the area of youth sports and daytime activities for seniors. There has been a 33% decline in the amount of space available. Pidge Hodovanie, Business representative: At present, there is a glut of office space available with a vacancy rate in Plymouth of 16% and 6% in Wayzata. Vacant retail space in the area is 10% or less. Industrial space, which is the easiest to convert to other uses, has a vacancy rate of 6-10%. Any future building will be only for specific purposes. Wayne Peterson^ Ministerial Association: In Wayne's survey of the 23 churches in the Association, he found that seventeen churches had community groups (i.e. Scouts, AA, Community Ed, sports groups) meeting in their buildings with many hosting 9-10 different groups. Eleven had schools or preschools meeting H-F. The majority had room to expand, but many on a limited (l/wk) basis. Most were not planning to expand and didn't feel that growth would displace the current users. LaOo&na Bey, Interfaith outreach and Community Partners: Because the plight of families has worsened dramatically over the last 5 years, the focus is on preventative measures. The issues: the struggles of young families, particularly single parents; housing; childcare; employment; transportation; at-risk 8-12 year olds who need mentors; parents who need parenting skills; the increased number of seniors who need respite care and tr2inspor- tation; and homeless kids. There is a need for a handicapped accessible community center with space for help with advocacy, referrals, legal advice, and tax & budget preparation. Collaboration is needed wi^ the schools, community volunteerism, other community organizations and individuals. Paul Landry, Wayaata Public Schools: Conservative estimates of the school district are for 9000 students K-12 by the year 2000. The unseen numbers which add up to 237,660 participants are from: Community Education, special education, sports, extra curricular activities, ECFE, and Adult Basic Education. There is a need for a new secondary school and perhaps an elementary school. The issues: how much space, what kind of space, and the location of a building. Information will need to be gathered collaboratively with businesses, the city, churches, social services and students. If a secondary school is built, it will need to reflect new ways of teaching and use of classroom space. Other issues: leasing space, converting buildings to other usages, and cnild vs. adult usage. THE QUESTIONS FOR THE GROUPS: (1) In your own experience, what kinds of space need to be built in the community? (2) Who needs to be involved? THE SUMMARY: (1) Building Space: Community Center/Nev School Some groups felt that a Community Center should be established. If the Community center would be in the new school, it could contain: (1) a central clearing house for referrals and other information needed by residents (2) social services (3) cultural activities (4) a school library for community use or perhaps the community library could be placed in the school/center (5) a family center which could hold a daycare, parenting programs (6) more space for the gifted and talented (7) permanent space for the GED/ESL program (8) new kinds of '^classroom'* space reflecting new education methods (9) Head Start. The new school/community center could be open on the weekends as well as other schools in the district. If a new high school is built and the old high school converted into a junior high, use the extra space for community purposes. One group suggested putting the community center in the Carlson Towers. Athletic Facilities: There is a great need for athletic facilities perhaps with a field house, swimming pool, space for gymnastics, gymnasium and playfields. It was suggested that this be a cooperative effort between the city and the district in planning, funding and usage. Perhaps the new school would not need to build athletic fields instead share current fields with the city and other school districts. (It would require a variance from the State.) Other Spaces: (1) More space for before and after school care (2) churches who are expanding intentionally plan for space for a 93^, Head Start, GED classes,etc. and be cooperatively funded (3) a healthy hangout for teens (4) northwest medical facility for social service needs (seniors, clinics) (5) permanent space allocated within all schools for community use. Other lafermatioai Before any building takes place, there should be a standing committee to oversee the process and educate the public. (2) Who needs to be involved? People receiving the services, students, educators, school board members, politicians, at-risk task force, non-Plymouth people from the district, a rep from other school districts, funders (Henn. County & Dept, of Health and Human Services), business leaders (Cargill), the Dept, of Trade & Economic Development for a visioning process. May 3, 1993 cjMM-jKin 6P' c^riON tervices .10 '^OUNTt " AD 101 1.0RTH PO BOX 66^ WAYZATA. f.'-. 5t;29:-.> '9u (6’2) 476-3. - 4 -0-3214 Ronald Moorse P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN Dear Mr. Moorse: WAY Y 19S5 55323 A recent survey of seniors in the Wayzata, Hopkins, Minnetonka and St, Louis Park school districts indicates that 14 percent of the seniors had run away or left home at least once since junior high school. Of those who had run away, over tvo->thirds left home more than once. Who are these young people?... What has caused them to flee?... Where do they turn?... Where do they live?... How do they support themselves?... How does the isolation and stress affect their lives? If this situation concerns you, we invite you to attend a community-wide forum entitled “Teens Alone". This program is being presented by t<;e Wayzata School District*s Community Education departmen *v Please join us Friday, May 21 at St. Phillip the Deacon Lutheran Church from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. located at 17205 County Road 6, Plymouth, Minnesota (1 block East of Highway 101 North), We will have a panel discussion on the issues confronting an increasing number of our Wayzata teens and their families and the ways the Wayzata community can become part of the solution. We will also have a box luncheon so we can continue through the noon hour. Your interest and input is essential to effectively address this issue. You are welcome to pass this invitation on or bring a guest. However, please RSVP by calling the Wayzata Community Education office at 476-3205 by May 18 the then. Sincerely, We look forward tc seeing Dave Throne Youth/Facilities Coordinator Gary Swedberg chemical Health Coordinator MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTICE OF POUCY MEETING 4:00 P.M. Thursday, May 13, 1993 Shady Oak Room Minnetonka Community Center 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota >■ Agenda: 1. Review general policies of Board of Managers. fr * ^ -1 •I WAV 1 0 19« TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 10, 1993 SUBJECT: First Quarter Expenditure Report Attachment; General Fund Expenditure Report As Of 3/31/93 The attached First Quarter Expenditure report compares year-to-date expenditures with budgeted amounts. The budgeted amounts should generally be 25% expended. The last column on the expenditure report (YTD EXP %) shows the actual percentage expended. The total General Fund as of 3/31/93 was 21.3% expended. Most of the items are at or below the 25% level. However, there are several items that are significantly over the 25% expenditure level. The following is an explanation of those items; A. Elections. 1.) Other services and charges. The main item causing the higher expenditure percentage is the payment of the annual maintenance contract for the voting machines. This is paid at the beginning of the year. B. Assessing. 1. ) SupplI- J. The two major items causing the expenditures to be beyond the 25% level occur only in the first quarter. These are the purchase of homestead cards ($269.00) and the purchase of sales books ($162.00). 2. ) Other services and charges. The actual expenditure for the Assessor fee (which includes the payment for the month of April) is $23,360. The additional $5,040 was a misprinted check that has been voided. C. Government Buildings 1.) Personal services. This amount reflects Public Works maintenance salaries being charged here for time spent moving supplies and materials from the old City Hall site to the new facilities. Although this has caused the Personal Services item in the Government Building division to be over budget, the overall budget for Public Works Maintenance Salaries is within the 25% expenditure level. Maintenance salaries are charged to one of five programs, these include; Government Buildings, Street Maintenance, Parks, Water and Sewer. The total budgeted amount in these five programs is $477,652. The total expenses as of 3/31/93 are $115,231 or 24.1% of the total budgeted expenditures. First Quarter Expenditure Report May 10, 1993 page 2 D, E. 2. ) Supplies. This expenditure amount reflects the purchase of numerous small items needed when the move was made to the new facilities such as additional waste baskets. 3. ) Other services and charges. The two main items affecting this larger expenditure amount are janitorial services and utilities. The janitorial expenditures are overstated here because a portion are to be charged to the Police Department. The total budget for janitorial services is $13,725. The Annual janitorial contract amount ($11,568) is well within the budgeted amount. The Janitorial budget is divided between two divisions; government buildings $7,725 and police $6,000. The utilities expenditures, which are for heat and electricity, are 37% of the budgeted amount. These expenditures were higher in January, February and March due to the cost of heating the new facilities, especially the Public Works building. The utilities expenditures at the Public Works building should be reduced significantly in the spring, summer and fall. This will balance the expenditures in relation to the amount budgeted. Human services. The human services diviaion includes specific amounts budgeted for several organiuiations. These amounts are paid as the city receives billings from the organizations. They are not paid on a monthly basis. Fire. The 28.3 expenditure percentage reflects contract amounts for Mound and Wayzata which were increased by a larger amount than was anticipated. F. Recycling. A. ) Personal services. The year-to-date expenditures reflect pubxic works maintenance staff hours. This amount has been mis-coded and should be coded to street maintenance. The recoding of this item would maintain the Public Works maintenance salaries within the 25% expenditure level. B. ) Suppliej. The main item included in the $619 year- to-date amount is the purchase of additional recycling bins. Thiij is a purchase that occurs every one or two years, as additional bins are needed. If the Council has further questions regarding the expenditure report, please let me know. CITY OF CRCNO DIVlStOH OtmAL PUMD CITY COUNCIL PCHSOMAL SERVICES SUPPLIES other services k CHARGES FINANCE DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE REPORT AS Or 03/31/93 ADOPTED CJRRENT BUDGET AMOUNT MONTH EXPENSE Y-T-D EXPENSES BALANCE REMAINING Y-7-0 EXP % S16.720 $530 $41,398 $1,344.95 $27.00 $90.98 $4,034.85 $83.07 $5,565.88 $12,885.15 $436.93 $35,832.12 24.1 12.< 13.4 58,818 1.462.93 9,883.80 48.954.20 16.S SUBTOTAL CITY COUNCIL DIVISION ADMINSTRATXON personal services SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES ft CHARGES SUBTOTAL ADMIKSTRATION DIVISION ELECTIONS personal SERVICES SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES ft CHARGES SUBTOTAL ELECTIONS DIVISION ASSESSmO PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES other SDtVICES ft CHARGES SUBTOTAL ASSESSING DIVISION $154,728 $4,050 $25,439 $17,529.98 $211.‘'9 $732.82 $42,225.43 $717.86 $2,599.67 $112,502.57 $3,332.14 $28,139.33 27.3 17.7 9.9 188,217 18,534.29 45,542.96 142,674.04 24.2 $1,960 $100 $1,700 $71.09 $0.00 $0.00 $71.09 $0.00 $9SO.OO J.660 71.09 1,021.09 $1,799.92 $100,00 $7S0.00 2,639.92 3,9 0.0 SS.P 27.f $1,290 $1,515 $74,393 $156.95 $347.87 $6,023.90 $335.19 $858.52 $30,338.33 $954.81 $8ie «8 $14,054.87 24.0 99.2 40.1 77,198 8,528.52 31,570.04 45.827.96 40.9 pumHCS SI2J,199 $13.. 139.71 $31,880.85 $91,317.35 29.9 mSONM. SERVICES $1,350 $167.39 $315.58 $1,034.42 23.4 SUPPLIES OIMn SERVICES 8 CKARCES $36,134 $5,746.80 $8,088.49 $30,087.51 14.9 SUSTOTM, riNRMCB DIVISION 180,812 19,073.90 38.282.72 123.419.38 23.i LBIM. $86,200 $11,888.84 $19,208.84 $88,993.38 22.2 QTm sdbtotrl lbom . division 94 200 ^11,888.84 19.208.84 88,993.38 22.2 oovnawvT toiLDinas $8,838.21 $14,838.71 $.3,825.71 123.B SnSONM. SERVICES 51,700 $588.71 $1,217.73 $483.37 n.« SOPPUBS $49 997 $7,997.14 $15,971.18 $33,925.82 32.0 OtHIR SnVlCBS 8 OUROSS $1,090 $0.00 $0.00 $3,080.00 0.0 CAPITAL OUTLAY SONTLfAL 00VWNME8T BUILOINOS DIVISION 88.890 15.230.C6 32.027.82 34.883.38 49.0 MBiTiiHltiiifiifrtliiift ift cm OF ORCNO FINANCE DIPXATMENT EXrCJDirjT^E REPORT AS OF 03/3l/9i Page 2 ADOPTED CURRENT BUDGET MONTH Y-T-D BALANCE Y-TD Dmsioif AMOUNT EXPENSE EXPENSES REMAINING EXP % MUHMt SERVICES OTHER rERVICES & CHARGES S14.670 $0.00 $5.104.00 $9,S66.00 34.$ IQITOTAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 14,670 0.00 5.104.00 9.5SS.00 34.9 ROLICE PROTECTION PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES « CHARGES CAPITAL OtlTLAY $902,825 $55,300 $138,000 $46,780 $98,074.76 $1,751.78 $11,060.74 $717.49 $226,297.73 $7,509.37 $23,087.56 $717.49 $<7S.S27.27 $47,790.<3 $114,912.44 $44,062.51 25.1 13.6 16.7 l.S SOITOTAL POLICE PROTECTION DIVISION 1,142,905 111.604.77 257.612.15 $$S,292.tS 22.5 PIRS PROTECTION OTHER SERVICES 4 CHARGES $192,476 $35,460.01 $54,482.02 $13$,19S.»I 21.3 1S2,678 35.460.01 54.482.02 13$.19$.91 29.3 planning 4 SOHING personal services SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES 4 CHARGES $266,995 $5,820 $38,102 $29,912.63 $400.10 $1,922.56 .^68,621.20 $1,009.65 $4,096.32 $196.373.10 $4,410.35 $34,005.44 25.7 17.3 10.6 SUNTOTAL PLANNING 4 SONiriO DIVISION 310,917 32,235.29 73,727.17 237,149.43 23.7 ■uniniNnr pRspAREDb'*ss SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES 4 CHAR>.''S $800 $3,150 $0.00 $260.66 $0.00 $771,19 $400.00 $2,974.41 0.0 26.8 3.950 267.48 771.19 3.174.41 19.8 ANIMAL CONTROL PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES 4 CHARGES $10,240 $650 $3,355 $793.C4 $0.00 $331.55 $1,954.65 $70.00 $331.55 $4,945.35 $540.00 $3,023.45 li.l 10.6 9.9 tURTOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL DIVISION 14,245 1,125.19 2.256.20 11,944.40 18.8 ■nZHEERINO OTHER SERVICES 4 OIAROBS $4,130 ^$260.00 $260.00 43,470.00 i.s SDNTOTAL ENOXHESRINa DIVISION 4,130 260.00 260.00 9.470.00 6.3 STREET NAINr PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES 4 CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY $214,945 $184,800 $87,430 $0 $20,491.41 $4 364.71 $5,476.00 $0.00 $52,663.97 $11,754.26 $9,429.18 $479.93 $142,241.03 $175,045.74 $74,000.42 $-47>.93 24.8 6.3 10.8 0.0 CITY OF C*lCNOfinance: DEPA.RTMEOT EXPENDITTRi REPORT AS OF 03/3l/?3 nxvisic:! SX3BTOTAL STREET MAINT DIVISION ADOPTED BUDGET AMOUNT CVRRZT.T MONTH EXPENSE Y-T-D EXPENSES BALANCE REMAINING Page 3 Y-T-0 EX? % PARRS 4 RECREATION PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES 4 CHARGES SUBTOTAL PARKS 4 RECREATION DIVISION recycling piocdp program PERSONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES 4 CHARGES SUBTOTAL RICYCLINa PICKUP PROGRAM DIVISION SPEC SCRV-CONSULT/POLICE PERSONAL SERVICES OTHER SERVICES 4 OIARGES SUBTOTAL SPBC SERV-COHSULT/POLICT DIVISION SPBCZAL PtOJBCrS-GOirrXM pnSOMAL SERVICES OTHP SERVICES 4 CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY subtotal special projects -COWTING DIVISION total general fund •L 489.175 30.332.12 74.347.34 414.827.66 15.2 $35,965 $2,230.71 $5.74 7.71 $30,217.29 IS.O $2,630 $107.33 $107.33 $2,522.67 4.1 $14,801 $501.29 $930.70 $13,870.30 S.3 53,396 2.039.33 6.705.74 48,810.26 12.7 $2,105 $550 $9i,40S $73.37 $0.00 $5,265.00 $932.60 $619.55 $10,530.00 $1,182.40 $•69 5S $78,275.00 43.4 112.4 11.9 91.460 S.334.37 12.072.15 79,387.85 13.2 $8,489 $12,008 20.489 $0.00 $1,388.75 $0.00 $1,458.17 $8,489.00 $10.541.$3 1,388.75 1,458.17 19.030.83 0.0 12.2 7.1 95.150 $146,400 91.T34 $0.00 $347.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1»S53.00 $0.00 95.150.00 9144.955.00 $1,734.00 0.0 1.1 0.0 division 153.292 $3,132,572 347.00 $293,744.43 1.553.00 $667,723.99 151.739.00 92.464,949.01 1.0 21.J M \ STATI OF ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA • 55155*40______ ONR INFORMATION (A!3) 3M41S7 May 7. 1993 Mr. Ron Moorse. CMy Adniinistrator Cttyof Orono Municipal Offices • P.O. Box 66 Cryc*4 Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Moorse: a^ ^ Maxwell Bay review process. I wanted to thank the dty of Orono Worfdng with the Citizens' Committee and the City Council review committee, chaired by ® valuable and constructive experience. We are proud of the worklrn tlS*itTOn£JIS Inttw^ure****** between the Cliy and the Department of Natural Resources and h^ ^ next step wll be to contact the property owners Included in the area that was reviewed by the Committee at the April 14,1993, meeting. We wii need to observe the normal procedures required bv statute to preserve the confidentiality on any negotiations that transpire. If purchase options are secured, we will re-initiate the review process with the City based on the property involved. We wll keep you informed of progress if negotiations fal; we wM Inform the City and pursue other possible combinations that may exist In cooperation with the City. PtaaM inform Mayor Caliahaa the City Councl. and Mr. Mike Gaffron of our sincere apprecfotlon tor the work and cooperation that has taken place. If you have any questions or need further information do not hesitate to contact me or any of my staff. Sincerely. DENNIS W. ASMUSSEN. Director Trals arxl Waterways Unit DNR Bulding - 500 Lateyette Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-4052 (612) 296-4822 DWA/GK/jIs c CyrRhia A. Wheeler Michael T. Markell (sordon Kimball Kathleen A. Wallace Martha Reger £nC Am * •D j • 3 r- MAY 1 0 1993 AN EQUAL OfEORTUNITY EMPlOYEH METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Piirk Ctitrrc. :J(I tuiM htih Stm t. St Put,!. M\ .\ytif !6.U A/.' Tv/ A.."5v H\ 6J: .’W-A.V'* I’D A/’ ^v/ May 4, 1993 Edward J. Callahan. Jr.. Mayor City of Orono c/o Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A 3400 City Centi^r 33 S. Sixth St Minneapolis, MN 55402-3796 Dear Mayor Callahan: Thank you for your letter concerning the Trunk Highway 12 Corridor. The Council's plans for Highway 12 do not include any major improvements through 2010. The Council is aware, however, that safety issues in the more populated portions of the corridor may need to be addressed. Last summer the Council made formal comment to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) on the Scoping Document for the proposed improvement of Highway 12 from Wayzata to Delano. In itt comments, the Council stated that the proposed improvement of Highway 12 would encourage premature development beyond the metropolitan urban service area. As a consequence, the Cbuncil recommended that Mn/DOT fully evaluate alternatives other than roadway improvemenu in the environmental impact statement The Council also recommended that improvements to Highway 12 meet future needs but that the road not be oversized or over-designed beyond that which is reasonably expected to serve forecasted development The Council will also have the opportunity to comment on the adequacy of the environmental impact statement In addition, if Mn/DOT proposes a controlled access highway in this corridor, under state law, the Council must approve such a project The Council is following the progress of the environmental work on this project and will continue to use both its transportation and rural area policies in future reviews of proposed alternatives. I appreciate your concern on this matter. Sincerely, Dottie Rietow Chair cc: Mary Smith, Metropolitan Council District 13 Recycled Paper L TOi FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 10, 1993 SUBJECT: Minnesota Conference City Management Association Annual I will be attending the Minnesota City Management Association annual conference from Wednesday, May 12 to Friday, May 14. The conference is being held at Cragun's Conference Center in Brainerd, Minnesota. I can be reached by phone at the Conference Center. I will leave the number with Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk. TO* FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 10, 1993 SUBJECT: Sewer Plant Property Appraisal I have enclosed information from the original appraisal of the sewer plant property. The appraisal assumes the sale of the entire 36.7 acres to create four lots-2 in the northern portion of the property and 2 in the southeastern portion. The appraisal also reflects the need to construct improvements such as a roadway to serve these new lots. An updated appraisal would provide a value for the 6 acres in the southeast portion of the property; based on the creation of only one lot, which eliminates the need for public improvements to serve the property. The person who performed the original appraisal has indicated an updated appraisal will cost $1,000.00. SEE OVERSIZE DOCUMENT(S) I L J ■4I I ■ 1p W w 'i Si? :-*y M mfe;.:/ ■4 "I KS f'. ■■■ - ,:««S 'M