The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-15-1988 Planning PacketPublic iBMiniSi 1275 tUunlK rtaiiiTSKTf igBEiiic wmmx, MIGD8T 17« !«§• 7t0« P.N. ZU. 'OBIWBlfWlfl# I 7iOQ Soifin9 Ordinaitcc hmmndment • ) B-d Bi<9hwBy CoMKrclAi Dietriet b| POD District “ IPlsnnsd Onit DsYsIofAsnt PfsicniSi^ * Shard low Public CcMBCfiDta b) COhtiauitiofi of tiorkt session with the Pisnninf Coaedssion ■'mm -:.-es cm ORO rlShSl rxLL fplss A dJu 3. / 4. • ! . {J M 19. H. r P.N !& («V«l0]plMBt i# Plannifif CMlli*ion -'4 ;v. ■ S.i ii •j;- ■ ■ <•■ ■ ««?■' m- X: m HimiC ATOItPAIlCg cm m mm mmm oktt tijyyti WILL oat fsi ibio ^atiqb itouested fcai oiat ciTf sic mAKg fplMM print}ADOEBSS MAiaE OE miMEBE PXESBVr fOt (from 3.^UXr /I. ir^j , J, Ar l^L^T^¥k,r^te P c» / /^3u^ try Ihiu n t3iS '.4# cm ct PLEASl 1 t 1. 5. i. 7. 11. 12. 13 li. 16. 17. 18. 20. ..... .. .-V -m:*■m ■ ’-V ^ •Yannifitf Co**i**i-*^ Oi*lf**B K«ll*y Qf^no City *dmifil»tf*tor B«rnh*r4F«f» Jmmnn^ H. nmbumh. iiilldlfif & Utt^m Mmlnirnttmtot I^O^OSt f# Ifli ^ « 11121 Tom Roiiiot# v*w PfOllMlftiry gabdlvliioM - ittblio Hoarln^ to.*„ a .cr« dry eo.tl,»o». .«• ..q«it.d. Portif»at OirdiMrao - , Oofioition ♦§. •Subdiviii'CItisiticatiofi *Clait 1 Sttbdlvliiofi* - ^ k1 subdivision shsU *»• •**“‘*‘,**®" JS*^^*,!ds ^scr*ptlon dssctlbod by“r;.‘2.?rs: rui!«..» ciltoriai 1.uabdiv is ion than two i»*^|!****^* T*‘r u*d and ssch lot has at is**^h*s litres (31?.8UB aqlaca which has bssn accaptsd U opanai by tha City or ^ or bat-a.n vahlculat tlaslbla sonlni application or Kt:“*o “ot ilnlillil otlliUlas 1. i.nvolvad, Applicant scaks a varlanca ^areals but naats all of tha •ubdiviilon involvoi »or« than two was already platted in May of other itandarda of the section. q „ old Crystal Bay Road on 'Ju. “ ‘ " ■ line rearrangement subdivision application. IList of Exhibits Exhibit A - Applicati^ Exhibit B - Property Owners Irist Exhibit C - Plat MapEXnlDlt: V •• rxais. r^»r E : l:c?!in‘’orthrco:rr«h.n.ive Plan DaaUn, With "Proparty Exhibit F - CrySc^ Craat Plat Approved Hay 1982 oivision Exhibit G - Subdivision Plans as Class I Metes and Bou mtm ■ ;«RI toning August Page 2 Revidi Tl fheis I Proper^ AS Mr. entire the sc •epara* will b to acq the pr Mr. P< proper range a 1 rear school locate asked use is s this d way to draina Plat i easeBK approv that c dlstr: For fu would future addit: owner provic I that ( north* the s Compr addrei addre only residf feel porti south. future rator uoua iar«ft raquirad. fopoaad at m avaraqa •• A Clasa I ty and shall ba on deterIbad by »f the following iltii ^n no wore ff[^ts or exceeds lot has at least IS been accepted sen to travel or •sons or between application or he code because the but meets all of the dy platted in May of Crystal Bay Road on 2 were involved in a Baling With "Property and Bounds Division m riio 11321 August 9, Ifli Page 2 of 4 **^^*The CiKy has boon aware of the achoo*l*s plan to acquire fheia aroierty oonsl sting of SO acres of land In the northwest quadrant of s\vu,%‘".siu to acquire Parcels », C, and 0 over a ten year period of time. ^ the ^ocess of eaecutlng a Lease Option Agreement with the Hr. Penholt also advises that thsy havs no devslopment plana for pr^erty at this time. They ars acquiring the land for t^ ^“74?^r4ct^has raMS tlannlng for the Or->no School District. Ths school district has alr^dy ^sn advised that conditional use permits would be required for achool^uss of ths property and because the principal sch^l structurs 1^ located on a parcel divided by a public roadway, the school district •Hid to SKerclse a special lot combination at the time a a future school use is established on ths property. staff sees no problem with recommending that the platting request for .hi. riti.itrb.~.lv«l. Th. o«..r. h.v. .lr..4y <i.dle.t.d th. rl«ht-of- ;iy ftr county «o.d » .nd Old Cry.t.l tUy «o.d CrU? dr.in.9« ••••■ont. ov.r th. d..lqn«t^ veliand. **'• „^'^***‘ 5f?fy Pl.t in 1»*2. A. . r..ult of that (lat. anrotrlat. dr.lnag. and utility • aaents hava boan dadlcatad alonq th. boundyi.a •Itrovln, thi. Mt.. and bounds diviaion, dooa V>®Coj-l««‘ that oth.r conditions should bo s.t forth by th. City? What If th. »chool district fall, to aaarclaa Ita optiona to lurchaaa Parc.la For future jl.nnlnq Fur(0..s, la it n.caaary to • *®"^^ . would travent the individual sals of those t*'®*^**^. noi with future? These lota haws not been apFroved as additional conaidarationa such aa Interior access to '®*^*- wnar aay bo ookod to eaocuto o priwoto rostrlctivo covonont that would trovido the noceaaory control If tho school dooa not oaaeuta thalr option. the surrounding reaidontial and tho propoood roaldentlol Coaprohensive Plon. Staff would only ask the Planning addfoss th. isaue of future occoas roads. The addressed the need for an aaat/wett road through the ®®““®'®‘* only suggested various designs of road patterns based on the final residential density of the northern portion. Does the feel that it is necessary to provide an access Jj,, portion of the property to serve the residential ®® **’* ^ * Bouth. The Planning Conunisslon will be expected to address the issue of a future road corridor through this property. / life?: A.mp ■i. ■ toning Pi August 9, Page 3 of Stuff Kmc To i Of lend I the wests to the I speciflea plat beci This varl I. appi uti grar 2. set ena< for 3 «i i. 5. nor Thi I 1. pri fori the 2. com wil epp 3, fut <■ } acquire the foreer lorthweet quadrant of laive Plan a»end*ent. L cannot purchaae the ional guidelines for e the properties in sisting of 13.5 acres id it is their intent of time. They are in 1 the current owners. ;ment plans for this r the purpose of long school district has ould be required for school structure is chool district may be Lme a a future school platting request for [icated the right-of- sdicated appropriate Ln the Crystal Crest drainage and utility of the property. In nning Commission feel '? What if the school Parcels B# C» and 07 blish a control that at some time in the ding sites nor with o lots. The current covenant that would jxecute their option. nsive Plan Amendment Duld now control the most compatible with .dential within the nning Commission to •nsive Plan certainly commercial area but based on the final i Planning Commission rridor through this the east and to the ddress the issue of a ' • ' . v: :-v->■ m- lloning file illll August 9, Hit page 3 of i This variance approval is based on the following findings! 1, The property was already a subject of a forMl attropriate road dedlcetiofis were granted to the public, drainage and utilitv easements, and a conaervation and flowage eaaementa wat granted over the designated wetlands within the subject property. 2. The Orono School District, the future owner of the property, has «.t forth tho tfttonl of tho school di.triet to oeqolro oil four tarcels over e ten year period of time. The school district will execute a formal agreement with the land owner to establish a schedule for the scquisitioo of the remaining three percela. Each of the four parcels meets or esceeds five acres of land. Bach lot has more than 300 feat of frontage on a public roadway S, No f leaible toning applications are Involved with this application nor is there a need for the ettenslon of municipal utilltiet. This approval Is subject to the following conditions! 1. Applicant to provide an appropriate Class I Metes ft prior to scheduling the application before the Council for final formal action. Staff will provide aurveyor with the guidelines Cor the final survey. approving any new school use of the property. 3. Options of action available to the Planning Conmiiaaion regarding future road corridor;a) The applicant need not provide a future road corridor through the subject property, oased on the following findings! 1. Surrounding use will be low density residential and loop roads can be provided in a north to east pattern. 2. The proposed higher density residential neighborhoods to the south of this property can be served by an road. The appllcint will be asked to dedicate a east/wast corridor through the subject property. -y-I Sonin, ril August 9» fage ft of . ... . • with prev scho pare defi diet • •. ■ ■mA % Duld cr«ftt« four parcel* ck 1, Crystal Croat mndt t> and grants a varlanca the aubdivlsion code* It would require a forsMi 1« lota rather than two. Indingsi a formal plat In which the public, drainage and flowage eaaementa was he subject property. ler of the property, hae ct to acquire all four e school district will > to establish a schedule cels. five acres of land, ge on a public roadway. ved with this application cipal utilities. ditionst I Metes i Bounds survey the Council for final with the guidelines for ;ed on notice that upon els, the school district parcels prior to the City ning Commission regarding bure road corridor through owing findingsi ensity residential and h to east pattern. idential neighborhoods to 1 served by an east/west I to dedicate a east/west iroperty. T mm. ■ ' m .r toeing file #1321 JUigust f. l^B® yage d «f l. Ttv. Co»n.Mnilv. PUn taantent |jo.ld.a plana for ...t/w... re«d. throu.h tfe* north qu.drhnt* of Area 3. U. the site and location of the property In the total 100 acra araa of Property araa 3* auggeita istroog need to define a throegh access corridor. ill. Baaed on the propoeed conditions of the lend over a ten yesr period of tl»e end Information regarding the future use .im ©f Uhool district, it becOMS the time of thle subdivision, a through corridor te defined. a. the current owner will be esked to file th. r.Idlvlda.1 or ..(..r^t. —Im of tho .objwrt p.rcJ. If th. ■Chool falls to comply with tha conditions of ths sgreement. The *lrc.l. h«v. not bo.n .ffrov^l “• **®^‘^**'‘* *trVn.*f’or*'Vo* tho defined for the purposee of the eale or transfer to district* j 1 h 'mm \k ¥ .m > ■* t s ClTt Of pftOBisin Sits .%d<! Proper tj Please I l^ttach : BFPiaCAl Hal ( Na; Ad ( IpaSYlN Nu De ft Pz PBQFOSI - j mr f • road coiildof through ring flndingii !B«nd»ont providod doilgn the north quadrants of jroparty in rolatlon to rty Area 3, iuggaats a tss corridor. Ions of tha tranafar of tlna and no dsfinito mss of tha land by tha tiva that at tha tiaa of • be definad. i rastrictive covanants ; parcals B, C, and D to ta subject parcels if tha of tha agraanant. Tha Dts, but have merely baan transfer to the school 'EmmM Sits Addrasi •a •r*. Ciwi OP CilOOO - SOBOrfllXOB jArPWCATKH paorom locAncw Pn^rty Idantlfication numibar^^l.D.I _ Please chact one - Property ^ abstract or Q^-//y -'2^-v^rc* :2 torreal? Attach legal descrlptioaB to applicatloo. atpucut' (Iw—) ^y ^AfojLiL^__________ Ptkon* tMorhl :V»? Ajiil--.- __ ____ {If dlffuut than applicant)Phone () Wspa Phone (vorh) Address t _ _ _ _ _„__- (attach list if more than oneI Cltyi Sipt imsnaQ laid osb Huaber of Ta* Parcels Development 81so Acres Dry Land Acras Ket Land Acres Total, all percelt Present Ose (chacA)Residantiali no. of units othar I specify )_£Xt prasant toning District iitOPOSAL_ _ __ Division for Ta» Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement (hily (no new building sitai) Subdivision for Rev Building Sites Number of Building Sitesi C'J>Existing units New Units Total Units Proposed GrOls Densityi Units par Minimum Lot Size:Sq Feet Dry Buildabla Land Proposed Uses (check) I— Residential /. other (specif V) /^ tUur 'm Mimmoi I 1. Comi Certifi< complete loning 0 Cartific toning 0 P Tha spp raquest Planninc further Applicar Owner's Applicai Plannin< third M review i unable authoria Office < > new building sites) Ltes iting Units units Ell Units bs per Peet Dry Buildable Land idential , , er f apedf V) , 2. I. mrniwnw HAmiAL wacBsSARf fOl ii. Cosg>lete<S Application Term UETE mOJDNXWytT APFLICATI Frelloinary Plat inforoatioo tm Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 3S0* lyou oust obtain this list frooi Hennepin County Depertoeni of Plnance A-SOJ Cowt Center 34t«3271). Stanped, legal siied envelopes (flO) pre*addressed to each of thii naoes on the above list with no return address Cuae address labels obtained with property owners list). As an addendto this appliceUOfi« please attach a separate list of any otJmr persohs fem with notified of this application. Certification by toning OepartsMnt that Pceliolnafy Flat Application is oonplata. toning Official’s Sionatura t^tm 1. paysMnt of faas (park feas# filing fee# sewer and watar asaessaantal* a. Signad certificata of sunwy or eyiar copiaa of formal plat. 3. Titla opinion. 4. laseneiitSt Covanants# ate. !5. pevalopara Agraesant and Letiar of Credit. Certificatioii by toning oepertnent that Pinal Plat Application is C^^lata. toning Official‘a Signatura _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Pats. 1150.00 250.00 300.00 20.00/Lot 150.00« Sliatch Flan Raviaw (Class Z» II 4 III) Praiininary Aaview (Class I i IZ Subdivision) PrellBinafy Raviaw (Class 21X and all non’-reaidential) Pinal flat Raviaw (Class III) •(Plus any lagal or angineerlng charges) tho applicant hsrsby agreaa to provide all infornation rsquirad or requested by the Zoning Adsinistrator# City Engineer# City Attorney# Planning Cooaiasion and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees establlshad by ordinance. Applicant's Slgnaturs Signature Data /-'■'■•it. Applicant CRUst have all substittals into the City offlcea 25 days before the Planning Conmiission Meeting. Planning Cocniaiasion Meetings are held on the third Monday of each »onth. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cemimission and Council. If an applicant Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 ’Zoning Office of tliis change prior to the meeting. m m PFLICATIOIf urvey. 350* (yoQ Bust obtain ance A-603 Govt Center reased to each of the I (oee address labels ich a separate list of Licatlon. f Plat Application ii Date >d water assessstents) • formal plat« ^plication is complete. Date _ _ _ _ _ $150.00 250.00 Ldential)300.00 4 20.00/Lot 150.00* ormation required or .neetf City Attorney, B this application and 3 by ordinance. Date / 368 25 days before the tings are held on the ent at all scheduled If an applicant is rangements to have an the Building $ Tioning % -•..1 i I 3IIK 3 tt\ ft •••I C «« i 11 1^1 i I ss»i 8ii 2 8 a ssSli ?! si m X M * ssS ..tsaa ^ A d ae Jistli •'SS x€»g M IHI M ^ S? <ihIts - r" < m 2| ai»s®as«l 4 3«IS >IU>! i #* 8 8 -5i i ^ sgld^zm>K i •a d» HIl:&ll %hl IPJ i ima*3 t i ri Si! m 111!i i 8** S9 >• V IIP ill >■ ■••i Vf.v ■i 'i *'* • • V ‘ Imk'pirmk^ Ns. iutl CU) P.0, CrjM nil Ofl' rti; pure Insi th#i We I seni cep' Boai ten- o ir o s o SCHOOLM5 f ly i r>«l^ Bli> VUwi l l^. ^5<5e»<m:» 4?V7M <s laJrfVfidini !>MrKi 2^^ Fcnb^ I h* iA* Sa^ctWflrnJk'm Us. lubiistti |yt)dt»i9 ( ZoQlRf Adelalstfiior CUy of Oroao P.O. foK M Crystil Uf, m 55K3 gE; mjRCMASE Of 13 i KH PMZtl MO ICASC 371 ACRES WITH OPTIOR TO PURCHASE Dtir Jtinnt: He f»i»t bfw idvliod by HiUltt Rtolty to eipress In wrUIng to y0« tbf roiion for pyrcHjsIng the 131 teres and lease of 37| acres, with option to i^rchise tddUiwal parcels, rather thin ill th# land at one tloe on an Installacnt contract. The schoo' district cannot porchase on af»i Installnent contract and 1$, therefore, eiarclslng Its right to purchase the tract In separate pa'^cels it have enterid Into an agreenent to purchase Parcel A (131 acres) and also pre sently Inteno to purchase Parcels B, C I 0 (121 acres each) separately as capital funds becoiie available. It Is the present Intent of the Orono School Board to purchase all the land eventual'y. The lease/option agreesent Is for a ten-year period. No developiaent of this land Is contemplated at this time. Its acquisItiQil Is simply part of the long range planning of the school district. Sincerely, ii1 1 iam A. Fenholt Ass't. to the Sup y • WAF:j® cc: Mark Bernhardson, Adainistrator Serving . .Independence-Long Lake —Mapic Flam-Medina-i^linncttmka Beach —Orono All Fxfuai Oppt'rtunily Employer ■ r' ■ t- ■ • if !‘»"-■ w-i ■ '•"■' 3.4 Property Ar»a Ito. 3 • Pcscrtption - Ttiis stca dc • igiuityd as frofNirty Crouftinqi Ho. 3# is ths lar9«st ain^la f>rof>arty in ihs study aras dssidnated for changa. Substantial portions of tho 168 aero aroa vara assesssd originally for both u«tar and savar, hemayar subsaguant unit allocations rasultad in savera linitations for daualopaiant. Soils in tha araa for on-si ta savaga traatnnt ara vary 1 inti tad. Tha ^ly asisting davalopaiant is a church in tha wastarn portion of this sita, abutting Old Crysta! Say Soad. Significant araas ara designatad %#atlands. Discussion of Altcrnstivas - Tha abova altarnativas ara as follows: - Ranain as 2-acra singla faaily rural rasldantial. This would antail leaving tha proparty tonad as is (rural raaidantial with tha ascaption of a aaall B-1 sona)* for possibla devalopnant at 2 rcra standards. Bacausa of tha concerns of aolla> p&rtlcularily on the toutharn portion plus the proximity to Highway 12» it ia doubtful that actual single family developrent would occur in the southern area. 1967 UTILITY ASSESSMENT AREA ♦ as »4gg-»sd‘»a4aag^g>sggssst sssssasgsttt t • Fig. 23 perty Grouping No. y £ir«A desi gi.ated 18 acre area werm hovever subsequent a for developpent are very limited. he western portion Significant areas residential. This ned as is (rural li B-1 zone)# for s. Because of the southern portion# ubtful that actual the southern area. Fig. 23 tr.. ■■iMi' 11 bl: :y.^ .atm -■•y- . *UerMll*«» for thl* •«•. tho Con»olt»nt pro**nto« * for JooolopMBt in thi* »«»• *“ n4^i«»on, tho aoat nff.ct#« propo.t, o-«.T. pr...nio« th.t. o-n d.tolop.ont ,eb.-o. Tho flr.t 4 .ch*no. proold. for front.,, rood c'wnodUW botooon Old Crrot.l BUloo Ofivo *nd Tothor circol.tion to tho •it.^to,.th.r olth r.t«.tlon of ■pproprUto wtUodi. Soeh dov.lopMfiti .r. *lthin tho ro.X» «f -o.i.tJn, e.p.citl..- without r.quitin, .ob.t.ntUl c.pit.l lnv..t»«nt to .ny ootropoUWn Tfe* four .cho... r*pr...nt v.ryin, d.,r... of tr.n.ltlon ttm C0«.rcl.» .Ion, ai,h-.y la to «,Ui-r..ld.nti.l up to tho «.tl.nd. -ith 10. don.ily 0iM»* and Couhty Road i Sch«« 5. « propo..d hS th. proporty o-nor.. -ottld n.c.lt.t. tb. con.truction of . no. ..o*r I In. to th. ton, toko pl.nt, olth r..ultin, ...or unit. In th. r.n,. of .pproxU»t.ly l.aBO. IhJ. n., .till b. within ..l.tln, «tropolit.n int.rcptof cpncity but would put . ,r..t.t burdon on th. .y.to. th*n th. alternative. W MySo.*. Sch«se A would north! multi' tote 1 this w prop#: indiv nunlei may b< r-V>-;:}•■ ••■i'.-J -j •.••I.-: lo aevclopin9 nt pre§ent«a 4 Sition, th« «o«t iwn dcyelop»«nt frontA9« road «lllov Dr|y« «tid th eatantlon of [• - '•^i within the ra«l» Ld9 substantial Tha first transition £ro» ential up to th« waan the watlandi i>»: rs» would necassitati Long Lake plant# with oximataly 1#200. Thii ii interceptor capacity Item then the eelecte# Hi■ ■ : r?9^ ..^rr,,*.'-,.. Schasw iio> 1 - As the »ost Intensiya of ilia first four altarnatlyas. this would proyide for 24 units of rasidantial dayalop^ant In th# northern half of the site* 13 units of to%m hoMs. I4i units of Bultl-fSJiily/apart»antB and a coaoi^ercial office dayslop»ant» totaling 215«000 square feat on 2S acres The wain feature of this would be a consolidated cos»ercial/offlee site centsrad on a propertfm as opposed to fchasie Wo. 2 where tl are would be individual pads. OeyalopHant on this site would be served by •unlclpel e^rer end «ter./ln the northern pert. .ln,l. felX, nay be grouped to take advantage of on-site sewage trastnent Ss£Cl_ f Fig. 24 PO! all so A 1 bo thi Scl COI f r el ho f .-,r. •• ■' IveSf this mt In the 4 units of elopmsnt^ reature of tared on a would be served by gle family treatment SsailQ tgcm > »• R i t >;r Iternative 1 Area 3 Fig. 24 r f'f'- .rt mmm pQSsIbi Httea given the limiteil soil con»^nlons far each* as an altecnaiive these could be grouped to all<J^ for Bcwer should tl» soils be to found to be unsuitable, however, the density would remain at the 1 unit per Z acres. the above mentioned alternative provides the eppropriete transition to the pr^ierties both to the east and the north developed or to be developed at tlM 3 acre atandard. SchemabOtl - As indieatedi this schama ahoold a variation in the eoffiiereiel ctMtfiguration and reduces the rein I/office space from 215,000 to 170,000 square feet. Xn addition this would eliminate the eultl*r«sidentlal but increases. th% nw?»lar of homes from 70 to 22I. !gscr snftcFr!iU I Alternative 2 ^ Area 3 Fig. 29 ■ •#! I tF I Schefse N' Thi down to units of SCF road an nbyt tint propert) beck fre Crystal m i for such. As an should Ih# ihe density would ibove mantionod to the prop«rtl«» ) be developed at arlatlon in tha clal/office space lition thia would the jiumber of, tcwn mXf- •/>OOe*a »'•' H,i «(5 iT/rr*^I H3S Alternative 2 H . ; •• 'I*.,./ Nt.;--, f:. *1..' • « i* • 'V I ^ ¥ ■v^ Fig. 25 % .i'I Sehaaw Ho» ^ * Thia aches© fe|i®f*rta furthai lidurtl^n of of fit© spsi© to 52.00® a.f.. hut adda If 2 wt its »*f ©ul t l-f a»i 1 f with llO unila of town houa«a. Schana »o. i diffota fwom Ochanta I ard 2 In tha frontage twd .ru by l«*i»9 prli.clp.uy ih* .Insl. f.vli.? front.,. i«*J •buttln, ■l,bw.y U .* • »•••'• ** boff.r ih. proparty ittm Hi,H«.y 13. it .How for ».f. .t.cliii., di.t.nc back ttom th. iBt.t.ectloB. at tilUcw Drive. Highway ll» and Old 'C___I------1 Ciyatal lay Ooad Fig. 26 cc ai 1fic® Rpacc 11 y with 110 :hy fiTGntfiqe rontage road residential ing distance t 12, and old #Mi 50C3P3PQOOVS?(T)r Alternative 3 Area 3 Fig. 26 ■Mfcah- • CQ9»«rcial/retail In thm soethwest cornet of this grourAi'^ •spends tli« hottsinq to 2?0 tcnm hones with no pmH i-f *»l ly* this sgsin f#etor»s e single Ctcing fiontef# toed, as noted In tehee# 1. "v^=: >■ 4"^ Q.k ieheee Ho. Thii rcini uniti end 3»scre rei f-a mt square feet of f thi® grouping an<l ■ • S^tggm 9a.: S * c»m#rf - Tbl. .ch«.* propo.rt .ppro.ft.lr »’«•««« *•«"••» ** ____,ci.I/ffH/««i<» «ith ,p,ro.U*t.lT 3«0 to »*® «|«tt«.nt imlta and 120 to 240 to»a hooaa with 34 ««•#•>«»•<* ainpla foAily 2-BCfO fftldancaa lo t»o north part, of tha patcol. ^ ^ ^ aa, ••• r*^I I 1 XT ^____iuafeg « « •% » ,•4- •• I mmV r i»r<^ T- M m ■ » • cmr * f -k :4Q iMACV -______ ItOBOiat Proflirty Own®r Propo®»l Ar®« 3 Fig. If •. ^^ i-// ; ;:’>ur‘ !:v-'-v -^.v:-. ■ i " •■- ■. :■ . -■■■-. ■ ■. ••• •=r5i! ;■ V ^ . •>• .H {] :1s UNOf 1#V* ____w ‘ ->. . . 4 o. u omci MICNMC I Ifotiffm W f JP ^ )wner Propo#il • Area 3 Fig. 28 fmmm ■ V‘ ■ ■#cqwiefKte^Si Alteraeti'e# • Th0 rnmtlMndm mnd aatucel In tl» aiea pr^^idm «]| tf«f»8ltio» between the eore iotenee eee pUnned for the toetli end single feellf to the north. Otilliing this •• « hresk, the eree to the north will reoein et the 2-ecre fore! residential standard, for the area soeth of the wetlands, the planning conssltsnt has offered four deeelopment schenet. prowlding wilti-faadly enits (either town heose or apart*ents> to the is»ediate south of the wetlands with altematiees for varied coooercial uses shutting highway X2. the four eltarnatives of development are considered at an acceptable level for projected sewer needs ranging fron 100 to 4S0 sewer units. eonfifurstion of the frontsgc roed would be dependent on the type of developcent underteken but would provide for access points st Old Ciystsl »sy hosd snd hillow Orivs. spproximately 300* bsck from their Intersections with highway 13. I Primary Frontage Road Alternate Frontage Road Proposed AlternaUfO Ares 3 •■yv : ■ in the area provida an tnse u&o planned for the th. Otllirlng thia aa i in at the 2-acre rural th of the wetlandar the development acheneiji I house or apartnenta) to alternatives for varied he four alternatives of ble level for projected 50 sewer units. be dependent on the type ^ide for access points at approxiinately 300* back i0 ii>iHa(w« ipiy!» mimimirnOy 2ac.mmm ily Residential nwnercial ad oad % ' Proposed Alternativi Area 3 Aofiut! Hi lt*8 loniitf ©i»txl^ “ __*« fotftl hrmm • .'§♦ •cr«* » - Co«ditlon.J ui* 9•r•i^ f«r tM «^A¥«tioa of • ^on4. UlO UH« *» «4U^«f •*co¥«t|oii is • - Jill #Qfk within tho flood |jl«in and C. Sactloo should b# notad that th# Uk..h«* ►rot^t^ r*V?«. b, tte ».t*r.h.d outrlet .na 5jrs:r'b:::«‘.r:r".!^/lima -um^ th. nooa si.i". |4Bt of Sshibita Exhibit h - Exhibit B • Exhibit C - Exhibit 0 - Exhibit B - Exhibit f “ Exhibit G - Exhibit R • Exhibit I • Exhibit J - Exhibit R - Exhibit L • Exhibit M - Exhibit M - A(|;licatiofi Prouatty ownsrs List Fist nap ApF Heart's hddandua. S*:tiH5;"plln ’i^sro..a with B.Udina fr-it i VUUSC ^i«!r-ri..vl«. of Dr.ln.a. PUn , ^ .^ tSJ.tl!lrP^ P»p*" aiovtlon in Mi«..hor. T.ta Survey 1^®*^"’ ,t TiM C.ttlflct. of™. :r.u ;:,"s;r5.- •• ™~™ South Lot Lina */«/ea Cook's Raport Oatad 8/5/i0 Cuox's Skatch ^r:«l^/Int!::'of%^.r*Jn. 0«ln.a. Are. 8 fond ■9- . V;' i • ; S'i 'M ;J^ i : ‘ toning August Faga 2 Briaf 1 hi lot wi withou issuad issuad hardCO tha 75 the bu tha 75 cartai allow! and hy SFPto' All oi S.f .P c ad jac consii had a i Raviab both i swale dr i v« auccai ownar const insta lakes ba CO Eng in alone Occup viol4 racai Occuj assun poin^ acqui of tt must coul< ona t Inspf r bile H#arinf emit for th# %#lthin 75* of ood i>lain and 3tad that thf 1 District and h Varlanc* shore Yard rtificate of ove Drainage & fond toning file *1?®' August Hi Page 2 of a Brief lleeiew ©f tlw Bletorp ©f tl» fro^rty •>.. jijuirMtnanii ovur tOl In sres and satisfied tl» re<iuir©di AS the issued for the subetandeid lot without the need ties the building perait was issued to irut.lg hardcover thet asceeded ^ ^ variance attlication (•••l> end the 75-250® aetbech area, hlrdc^ver asK>unt of 211 within the building fareit **• B. feaolution #l72i that daniad the 75-250* letbach ares. veriancea to the hardcover e«rtaln ^HlcatiOB. b«^»« ®* »•*»<«>• •nitB**rlna d««H0 S.f.. 251. allowance. D»rlB, th. tUTo'uVh.'^th". Vo^^^B^"5•thVt°a•rVlBM^ b.d .X-.y. b«.n Srl?S.5rtl.n. ar.l«.q. ^.U. 'long both pVj,or ii.?I?t.tlofi th.n th. ...t .rof.rtvswsle would have to be I i^wer ri» •*« ««*ie attaared to function drivow.y i.*ur»2l any comuVnt. fro. tho jrot.rty ■uccoMfully. •• tho . ,1 li cortln-iod to bo • probloo throuqhoutownor to tho north. The .outh .Ho conttnjoo to^ urutmio. h •»»lo con.tructlon ond .toff thoro w«» retention of run-off In tho in.t.llod but it t-'"- 5«1m^Pbi” UKhlblt r). e .-.lo tol.ko.horo y.rd, note that In tM dral^qe plan JKni ba conatructod in to *, *,tiona of Krutilq'a dralnaqe attaopta Enqinaar navar approvad the to laaue a Cartiflcata of alonq tha aouth lot llna. The City . . . other bulldlnq code occupancy until tha *Jrutzl^ Bui Idara loat the houae after itviolationa uara coaplatad. Krut,ig euii j Certlficata of racelvad tha »«99io t property ouner only upon Lyisan LUBbera'occupancy waa issued to the current p t drainage crobleea, that up to that assuiption of all costs to ^ Engineer. Prior to poinr had not been resolved or •PF contact ev office and I advised her Scqulrln, the property, Mra. Touth lot line and that it of the unresolved drainage problee a . . Certificate of Occupancy ;;.vs,r,YS 5;:,:;,%' 5 • •: 0 w. , I sMm "" toning Pile 11109 August 11. 1980 Page I of 4 franriow of Currant The applies drainage probles ravlaw. Review i awale along the resiaina at a gra contractor haa ii undarlinar of plai liner placed with the pond and a ta aide of the pond In addition* th«i< tabric adjacent Landscaping with tha City in a rac fact, both groups As a result, the property over the in addition, prov allowed. Review Exhib. proposal, once a« avals along tha s najority of work within tha flood tha 931.5 alevat lakeshora yard h setback line saemt of the house. Co< no significant in: to the lake. Staff Re ndati Prior to ask regarding the cur first advise the tho City's policy flood plain. At with the construe flood plain of La swale that would c final elevation < again, the awale was intended. As graduated and tern :ied the required substandard lot Ldlng permit was Lding permit waa issive amounts of hardcover within cation (iiSl) and lint of 211 within U726 that denied to the hardcover ngineering design , Mr. Krutzig was dered hardcover, ined at the 4»725 losely with the t drainage was lly the drainage e subject parcel, nage swales along □th lot line, the property owners* ed to function from the property oblem throughout sig. A swale was of run-off in the !•), a swale was to an out. The City drainage attempts a Certificate of ;her building code e house after it he Certificate of pon Lyman Lumbers' If that up to that gineer. Prior to and I advised her ; line and that it cate of Occupancy in confirm that no it and make a final T line. ;v . -vs; I4»iin9 Pile •1109 August 11, 19i9 Page 3 of 4 tiawiav of Corraat Aftar-tbo-Pact Applieatioo - The applicant's landscape contractor has atteopiad to solve the drainage problena along the sooth let line without the benefit of perolt review. Seview Bxhibits M ft M, Staff can see no change in the original awale along tha south lot line that Prottig had Inatalled. This still reosins ss a grassed eres. As you proceed lekewerd. the spplicsnt't eontrector hes Installed a stonad pathway leading to a pond that haa an undarlinar of plastic. The pond Itself has baan eonstructad with a plastic linar placed within the satire cavity of the p<md. Large bouldere outline the pond and a raised landscape area has been installed along the south aide of the pood with filter fabric undarlining tha entire landscape area. In addition, tlmim have seen new rock landscape areas with filter inatalled fabric adjacent to the boulder wall along tha lakeside of the house. Landscsping with filter fabric or plastic was classified sa hardcover by the City in s recent review by both Council and Planning Conaiiaslon. In fact, both groups unanimocsly votsd to classify flltsr fabric ss hardcover. As a result, the Isndscspinv adjacent to the boulder wall would bring the propertp over the allowed 2Si hardcover with the 75-250* aetback area and in addition, provide hardcover within the 0-75* setback area whara none in allowed. lAeview Bxhibits K ft L, Cook's letter and sketch regarding the current proposal. Once again, he calls attention to tha need to re-construct the swale s!ong the south side of the house. It should also be noted that the majority of work perforned within the lakeahore yard has been installed within the flood plain of Lake Minnetonka. All work appears to be below the 931.5 elevation. Not# the entire deck area and bouldara in the lakeahore yard have been placed along the line of tha 931.5. The 75* aetback line seems to be 5-S* west of the boulder wall along the lakeahore of tha housa. Cook also notes that the pond construction sesM to provide no significant improvexMnt to the quality or quantity of watar dischargad to the lake. Staff ITS r rsfii ixlstioa - Prior to asking the current owner to submit additionsl informationt regarding the current proposal, staff feels that it is the City's role to first advise the applicant what improvement would be more consistent with the City's policy regarding work within the lakeahore protected area and flood plain. At this point, staff can recall no application that dealt with the construction of a pond within the 75* setback area or within the flood plain of Lake Minnetonka. The previous drainage plan called for a awale that would continue and fan out withn the lakeshote yard based on the final elevation of the swale along the south side of the property. Once* again, the swale along the north side seems to be functioning the « ay it was intended. As the elevations in the lakeshore yard appear to be more graduated and tend to slowly drain to the lake. w>::-• •• - : • • ' ' V.y % toiling Pile I August 11, 191 Page 4 of 4 The Plan naw resident approvablt in X. Woul fabric? 2. Mou1 bOQldars run-off 3. Appl daa1ing called f •lopes 1 3. Ths 1 Importan fill wit fil 1 wi should fa 4, Any Planning In any c proposal and applicant'a drainage pro within a real to eolve th« n^fit of pormit n th« original !d. This still he applicant's ond that has an with a plastic oulders outline tlong the south landscape area, liter installed I of the house. IS hardcover by Commission. In Ic as hardcover, would bring the etback area and a where none is ing the current e-construct the i noted that the been installed ars to be below oulders in the 931.5. The 75» g the lakeshore eems to provide rater discharged tal inforroatlofl i City's role to consistent with tected area and bion that dealt a or within the in called for a ird based on the property. Once ning the v»ay it pear to be more losing rile §1309 August 11# 19il tage 4 of 4 The fianning CosaULssiofi isliiOQld address the following Iteaui so that OuT new resident has soM basie understand ing as to what th# City deems approvable in solving this type of drsinage problems 1. Mould you approve the (crushad roefit landacapinf without the filtef fabric? 2. Would you approve the pond if it was outlined merely with the boulders, with no filter fabric with only a grassed swale carrylisf the run-off from the east sleng tha south lot line. 3. Applicant should be advised if the only scceptsble method for desling with the drainege on tha proparty is the original plan th^ called for a grasaad swale that would fan out to more geAtl# graduated slopes in the grassed lakeshore yard« 3, The fill that has been placed within the flood plain ie a far inKortant issue. Staff would have to recommend against plac«»nt of fill within the flood plain as the City has been consistent in denying fill withir the flood plain. If the fill or pond is to remain# It should bs reviewed by the Minnehaha watsr Creek District. 4. Any othsr options or methods of drainage Improvement that the Planning Ccoalasion would like to address or advise applicant. In any caset claarly the Planning Commission must tabla the currant proposal and based on the directives to the applicant# ths applicant and applicant's contractor must wotk i*ith City staff to revise the current drainage proposal and reeowiand a schadule to make the necessary changas within a reasonabla tima fr ■1 msp^ ■•v; ■ ■ ' ■ ■■ •. V L - : ■ ' •fc.:'; f. ..■>9 ■j. u CITT Of OiCWD,- iniOPBRTt LOCATI Sit© Addreaa Property Identi tl#»'^e check or (for Condi Please attach 1 on reguired aui APPLICAMT Name filtL4 Addreaa OMinai (if difff Hame _S Addreaa Date Prop< t (dmJ (d< PiSS * CQHDITK Renswel P< After-the* 111 $1 $1 $2 §2 PR orm APPLICAT $1 $2 $1 $ $2 $1 Ot Ing items »o that oor hat tha City daams g without the filter nad merely with that Bd awale carrying the ceptable method for I original plan that lore gentle graduated d plain ia a far more againat placement of conaiatent in denying ond ia to remain, it iiatrict. Improvement that the .ae applicant. lat table the current It, the applicant and 0 revise the current he neceaaary changea mwmi ■ ItciTT or CERBSAL ijyf^ osK ATrLtca^faiiBi^^Birrr locatioh Site Address Ifc ?»3L —fed Uwi _ Po/^rT R & fi-ffU riof«rty id.ntificatioa Htabcr (,.1.0.1 H-II 7-Ji II ebaeJe OM - Proparty abatract or ^ torranaP Ifor Coiiditlwial Oae Af^licatloms «ilyl rieese attach legal description to epplieetioii if not included on reguiredi survey* _ name ^£4 A) rhone (worh) ‘ -i ^ i 7 Mdtaaa 143-^ _ _ <if different than applicant) Phone theme) S ft mg.Phone City *ip. «i % ■MMMimm» ------r '^'4 " 41*4 Date Property Acquired Jm a# C. I # j ^ It - - (■»nih/yeag) ^ 1 (Am) (do not) elao own the adlaceftt parcela of land. WWSS - CXRTOITIOHAl. 08B PnollTS “ Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee- Double Current Application Fee •' a •« « ^ . V w • • • • * y •* ’ After-the-fact Fee 1100.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) y $200.00 f) •. K a V a ‘ • a ^ V • V I SISO.QQ b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) Duplex Credit/Bldg Coamereial/Industrial Dse Land Alteration Grading and filling - daalgnated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or «ore Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PXD - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIORS $150.00 $250.00 $150.CO $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Reviaw (♦ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Sux*lvlsion Reroning Appeals 'P Other - see fee schedule c'/i--:: m siki.-A. f mm m mEsnrr osb or raoramr RreMnt toninq Diatrict 1 FrttMOt of Ffoporty Besidoatial (•pocifyl oBscmirricii or umo/awst itBQoxmB) mmmrTMJB ^l. Coii^iatod J^rllcatlon Foni. -2. 9 I. v/5* e. I. Cartifiod Proporty Ovnars List of pwnart wlthiii 9SB* fyou clnj obialfi thia list froai Hanaaplii County Dopartnont of Pinanco A*€OJ Gorornsantt Cantar 348-9271) Staapad, la^l altad anaalopa* (ilO) pca-addcaitad to aach of tho luuMa on tBa aboaa list with no ratom addraia. Cartificata of survay. Topographic turvay (axiatlng and propoaad contoora) if landl aitarationa involva chaofaa in aiawation (gradaa). Construction plan, if appiicahla ftaa staff for raqwivosiarti). Plat Map. hs an addaodua to this application, piaasa attach a saparata list of any othar parsons you wish notifiad of this application. Tha a^^plicant and Proparty Ownar oust sign this application. Piaasa raawaa>ar that your applicati<Mi is not coaiplata if tha abova inforaation has not baan includad. Cartification by toning Dapartaant that Land Usa Application is coaiplata. Zoning Officials Signatura Data APP1«XCAIIT*S SIGHAltmi Tha applicant haraby agraas to provida all infornation raquirod or requastad by tha Zoning Adninistrator, agraas to pay all faas and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that t!ia infornation supplied is true and correct to tha bast of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Data OMKBRS SIGHATURB Tha owner hereby acknowledges and agraas to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto tha property by City staff, consultants, agc^nts, connission nenbets, and Council mcNsbers for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date 7, / ? f-r Applicant must hav^all submittala into tha City c :ficea 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission icetings arc held on th** third Monday of each month. Applicants must bo \ resent at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Coomiiasion and Conn* il. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please maV-i a:..'rangement8 to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advJ.jjr the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 4‘- ■ '> „ ■) If lana rate list of on. Please ormation has required or fees and/or (rtlfies that of hi8/hs>r 7 iqyy' and further consultantsf purposes of 1, /9tr fs before the held on the LI scheduled applicant is s to have an Lng & Zoning ii ‘Ifei ra*5i-I!€ z B <IH- i IS< mm •> HI s i if|S -8-'*1 5 c 1 85 mm h S s;liu Ii( I C O f M > •• > I isi>- N a ^ ttim m'- i m 90 S *!i :|li Ml* 28E •I mm o *-4oo § fa >t G 0Sg *8a*Kl mm •» Se II)M mm m “ISi i 941Kmm ^ 5 ii >• < mm 1 ^ * i -*►- 1#^ < X 2 <“2-.5J >•1 2 E Q M >*-.528 o9 MlK *.*■'...*. \ ' * *- I:;"-# 2"5»SJl • U U Jl 6S9>m 9>m 2eS3 *Siim lh‘ Z isS2 c» Ml M M M ^ ^ M M ^ « .«I M ^ n o 2 2 3 t ||« 5 8 I / i! it ^Sg llh<3 m 1^ llUias.aSi o /I■)Oi ^.1W'm _iniI?!I5| = mrnZZt^*^ !-Mii*A •*« <4 si!i:ii .1 i ipiig f’ijh |8eS; S • n •* ei 5 tm m O H'* nlii^ LiiP -*sss2B ^ z ^ ' • H ifz ^ s ^P «• 3 I a » ^ i- * si 1,8ll|! ""*§ 2J-•5 }S;I wi 1 3;- Hi s i ii *fis «8|8l 3 i P i 8 *s m 90 i S *lli *5«»-|2|«**!iIS •*4 = £ s ®s Sas EIM ** ? * 5 lg i5 2 S a o <8 itl . ^ - V^., . i-y-artVi '• -;': ■ ."it ; :. .. ‘ _ /;•v-'• • ^> • .1 -a'p Mf 29 # « ‘ t «Cltf Cdunrii mut awwrtl i% vif« t flpiMt • tmximr lorn Sfiii» r—imtnc lo*i«at# putm. fmt m M M tlJiiUr unit# pkBm tfci— Mir root* iLrxmtd tnm ouatfAHQ Mt«r. teviao piftfiini QMT i*A MB on June UlftT. umgw OKiated a daproosian fa depth vlUi Ml oriNi 10** JO*. tlM I dg oMBBd t¥P 20* Mate pAnae, ermu ym odors froo aXpee arovtli Prior to uetor itet oee f had kiUad off the gr taroadifla pond msI faue la Ml sitMBit to iMprovo our anrircnaani sad pravaM fartlier loan od the tuo faaainlny idiits piiiae* ua eyadht tJie sdvica od thraa differ ant lindecajing firm. Ml thraa euw—Kd • P»d he oonatructad and serstad hacauaa of the standing «st*f. The ancsvatad sol: fron the pond itmld ha placed on , the other side od the pond to fom s ana 11 tao foot Mglh aoietd to plant raplsoMMOa avargraon treaa and ahrulM# tharaby Kasplng thatr roota dry. He procanded vith this aolutlon and aawaNd the iaadecsper aoild tahe out any pandta If naadad. ha it turnad t?yt* the landacapar was aa unaeara of the need for a pansit aa m eara. liecvrely yours* OaraXd and Barbara Nelaon 1629 Oohna f>Oint BJ. (hono* Mtt : ■ m July 25,l9i8 rec^tly moff and year ve had inding wat«r. on Juno 1»1587, oollng runoff nding water a raosquito 18 of the nt landscaping cause of >laced on .o plant replacfflBffint .d take out i unaware of 'T- City of OROrSO £ MmgTKM o» im ciTftoe^ m. na> * *- * • «jt MMouPTiow mmiwa a vaaiakis MomcirAt wmim coci siCTiaii lA.ai. smtvittos 2 riui m* ffSIlBAt. C»tto» Boms. I»e., • ^*""/*f** coipcration. «h*r*lMrt«r •th* »pDlic*»f> ci*i* tract h, BetJatarad taad Sarvay »«. sa», tanaapia Coanty# ftiniiesotA lh«r8iiwift«f •Property* >i wBEllASa itio epplic^nt hs» spplioE to aartanca to Municipal lonint Coda ‘ “ I eh to peroit the const met loo of docks, slde^sU, would l»cro880 tho hardcover fioo laftO squere feet or 2 . _ 5,9S0 sqoere feet or 31.5% in tho 75* to 250* only 25% or 4,725 8qu#fe feet of hardcover It allcwodi end MBSBBAS, the City Council hes conslderod •pplicatlon includlnf the flndlnqs Plinnlnq Co«si.slon, reports hy City ^.af.trTnS and effect of the proposed variance on the health, saiety • welfare of the coP«unity. 8CW, TBER8FOPB BE IT BESOLVIO that the City Orono, Minnesota, heraby denies the eiylleatlon . Booea, Inc. for a variance to Municipal Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 for the property legally deacrlbad above, baa^ on one or ocre of the following findinrftt 1. Tha OroBO Plannin, Co»lacion ravl.^ thia on Movember 15. 15§4 end recosi»or.ded denial or rno application baaed on tha following findingai a) Applicant was asda fully aware by City staff of the hardcowar lioitations on tha pror trty at the tiia® of application for a building peraxt. b) The lot la substandard in srea and width in the LR- IB Soning District in which it is ocated: property is substantially large e;r igh that it cor id be developed within the hardcover 1 t-'^tiona. and tho conditions leiding to tt t r.' d for a variance were created by the applicant. page 1 of 4 •i i ^ 2. in by ba • u iu CO 3. tf ol Orono drivaw. eondit I a IT: mm!:smms >NO !W»«IL ffiS • r a Mlnn«»®ta ovnar ©f hin the City of It follows: onnepin County, the City fof • Subdivision 2, I drivaway which fast or 21% to bacK 2on® whsr# :wedj and >n8id©rad this ndations of th® nti by the owner 1th, safety and ; City Councj 1 of of Krutxig Custom g Code Section lescrlbed above. this application denial of th® City staff of the y at the time of width in the LR- ted; however, the I that it cov ’ld be lions. 1 is not necessary ght of the owner, d for a variance . V,.-. ^ntrnm i.% «CItyofORON gfJOtMTiOM af THl CITY COlimi. fiD. rl*iXw • ••• * *•“ 4 • • * UiJ*i n* prop*,!, otf Wotl T Mfdicov®! will (d#cr®®t« lit cap®c» t float. t, tk«Ce«nell **■"ItdiM ItcSiclI^V »”^*«^***" j^fri«r lay«r *^rfat®d bf applicant to b« • urfaco. ha* Jb *• to not boaufficlontly p®f»«obl# l» this inston*:® coftiidoroO hardcovof* of 4,725 S<|uar® foot In th® t> _ne IT RftSOLV&b th®t th® CityriHTHIh*®0«B, it IT ®»w dock. sid®wnlSi, ohd Orene h.r.by W4rlv«««y i.prov«s«B».» tP th. pApaity »uD,«r. conditi^Bi HMt th. tcUo-li't f lB»««P d.»HB r.puif.P*"t»i .) «.tB of d.cki«9 «-td. «y f.nf ttm M» l.« «>« 4* to no siOf® than •* in width. p, ,.tio PC herd width tp .^Cinp wl-th P.y b. bp qr.Bt.r th.B iJil !• »» «»P*" •P*‘’«>- c» h i/i-iBch *>‘9b ^ w p"‘.V.Vt^?«c? th® uppor p®riEet®r of tn® o«on r runoff . P) A mini.u. ot a 11-inch jJ ’p^,"'jl**‘,^.*'ndinq und.r “,•*1° Uyar. to th. orlplral •‘>1»downward through any riii i#y surface. «) the d.ch pl.t for. thall "^® rcnr;r;pp:rJe.*br: ‘p^-®-^- ®®— etc.) under the dec)c. page 2 of 4 m- :~4ai Ji© m \ i » 0 11 l low of iaditional pting thi* Ign, which underlain with no ing ground vnt to ba to not b# e proparty limitation Council of lawalkf and B following are feet in \Q deck mutt m less than ;h e&y be no tailed along ivent direct jst be placed d extending original soil n 12” above >le barrier jnd surface :ure place- Crete slabi f ys * **■ 1 'S. # # -1; city of ORONO^ Ml totirriOii OP tm crrv coi^ioi if AnESTi . i5?ot 3. fha apf^llrtrt i» pUc«« oa aetica *^‘ *^* ^* ^ iBparvloaa a«tartala. ai>cloaad, or in nny t^^eoM hardco*ar. «*lt»wit tha *raii»t»« «< * haf4c*»« war lance by tbia or a fetere City Coen^*l« Tt.. .Id—U ."4 drl»a»..y .r. ’ total of l« aqaata faa^and ordar toimiowative lurfacing Mtbodt pr^ipoaed to ^ in ^ •iicee4 tliia apoont are subject to review by t e City. i Violation of or non-«o^-plio»ce with any of the *1^ Wdutoj. S thla ia.o ’ati«. .hall * ’IVa tuth^?ityq"^t.d ‘araln. and ahall ba p.«l.h«bl. •* • niadeoeanor . 5. Tha uodor.lqnad applicant b«a 'Vi*.M*^h!lf Lrabv a«raa» to tha taroa of thli raaolutlon and ^ ^halt of hinaolf hit haira. auccaatota and titllof to tho to.ordinq of thld raaolutlon In tha chain of tit lo the pr'-perty. kdoptod by tha City Cooncil on thiP Uth 4ay of Febru#a.yf lfl5* Mary Sutler. Mayor ■ C. ^ . A (l) i?roperty Owner page 1 of 4 V< /V-.-tm *n <d» «A »b ee •*r ?! a NOW •a ec p e«* fc e — le c s (O ciL ■■ >•*.1 !:: •". .4 > A deck and th« ovarad with iltarad to a» a hurdcovar irdcover to • Dent Of othar d In order to i City. the tanai and e a violation Larminate any niahabla aa a darstood and and on behalf hereby agreea in of title of t 11th day of or \ m > u mmS M «»W mo99 iA o ■lA CO 1 m C C GO •9 2 m O ••X • •• •• •• • o a mmm o m «o u o wn o O JUf9 U S*J4M Jm't II City al ioa iC Cfy«t«' Attai « let Ovi Kn li (Dear J< The £o Krvlt i| I. 3. 4. 5. 6. If you Youri 50NE8T Clenn GRC:•• End. 9220c i (U >u o a u VO o to . in uo B in CO 1 H c c 00 o to 1 m u o »—•£ ^ • •• •• •• • a B <D r—•D to U to o KO o o %jr hMJ fi^*tFt §sm Ja*v II, im t mm m» ft #« Citf •! Oiraai %vm %%tt7^tm\ M> rm iilis Attmt Jhmmmm t«i Out ftla ■•. .H tnitait Wtm Mm r*4»i 0*«f Jtaiwii, try «.* CM CMTcrtiv* irMlai vorti —it# #• irvfiii yrMrtf at USS l(Hl«. AC4xi^ fktt f«ll«vUt S« a • 1. ftctaUitia Mill t® W c«M*t®cf#4 « ■UU ks •! §‘ fr«« yroM^t? li®« t® fac« #f valt. 2. OraiMfa tviilaa aloai ptofmttf *4Mf t® fc# 0.5* lepiT c K m •4i«c«ni Mi|^Mt*a »f®»®rty •! lot l£®® 1* 4® fr«®i lot l4o2i. I. Drailuifa cwilt alona irivrvay t® M of 1.®* loMr tho® of fOTcatac Mrloo® 5* fro® mdgm of k^4o«way* 4. totololoi wall baaa to M sioiag® of I* t^loo •a4aC4of olaoatioo at yroptcrty lisa. 5. rill OB laM aiM to M roMoo4 ififtiio 7S* araa. 6. rill io back y«c4 araa to ba roMood to otitinal U’od#. Cradf to b# taporod froB prattat grada at garaga to ®atcb otig'otol grada 50* oaat of garago. If yott haaa aey goaatiotta, plaaaa contact thia offic®. foara vary truly, K»IESTI00, lOSElCI, AMDEILIK 4 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook C£C:aaa End. 9220c tar h^j u ?-0 aC fi #<Pi PM < V9 griding vork ncidid OB Ch« minlaua of §* fro# proHrfy i*®* t to bi 0.5’ lotfir thin idiicfnl 3’ in froo lot lin«. ninicum of l.O* lover lliin idgi of f v^-lvewiy. f L’ t>low Qxitting eleyitifm it hin 75* icwbick irei. d to original 'ttridt. Grade to be e to match orig.'nal grade 50* eeel this oftice. INC. -V*.* V ■ ■ Nn I' c: >4 X V# %uc> I 0* ^ • » K m •• r #•»• • • i#m •-* ^ -• 0t MCl <X 41 -n \ N %• K K# X K » <» i X § I % N »« £ ^ Ss H : ■•T.- 'im m % V %s* •^4 *• V. ^ . V* V N 2 % \ !• c: 5 i\ !?% \5 S.'* /% ii •• ? I V « <. % K N- N -f^ r i§29 iMi*s potst wmm l« Ul#•rsifii«d Tmcmipt of a Cortificai# of Oecvp^fycy frott %hm City of Orono foi tH# pfoporty at lS2f iohn*8 foinf toad vitS thm yfidaraiandinf that th« drainao* alooo •••« ®f prc^rty Hat not ^##n appf«. oad by tha City ■r.fiaaar and aay naad rawotlkiny it tha aspanse of Lyan UsmSmSi L te? ■ ■’:*i ■ las^ / W.-<:;':}ti<' ^ f 1 * \* '1 :"*** ■» }'. * # "-i'4i« -4i^ • ‘ '* ^4 ■4^ I" » r^i ^ ■ i;' *•#. * • > ?44i M 1 m 4 1- ••i ^ tf• .;y.K»,^ MWIIlilliiilill V • Toi namiifMi CoMiiftsiofi Ch*lrm*n ir«lt«y Orcmo CoMDlssicm »9m^rm City AdAialstrator ftarAhariaoB J«ajin« A. Bylldliif ft toninqi Adaialsttftloff Oat«si Si^]|t^t I AOfllftt •• Ifit • 1310 noMtO r« titlA9*r« 13t% ttaysftta tovlararO pMorntml OsoOitlMial Use Asnsit - OobUe mmsi»9 ieiiiftf District; - Rfi-ID fertiiieiit SscticM of tbs Oods - Ssctioii 10.01. Sabdivisioa If. 30 • ConOltioRsI «ss |jsrait for fill sad 9TSdia9 in •xcsss of 100 evbio yards. Soctloo 10.09 - Cooditionsl ass fsroit ftrocsdurs Asnsws?of coaditloasl ass psrsit - AftiUcstion IllOl Sft'provsd by tbs Council on June 0. 190^. Af*|;lic*«l«» involves the filling of sftjpro*i»stsly 100.000 cubic yards of clssn fill within a 12.9 sera irofsrty - forrsr sits. Ac^licant (;ro|.osss no changes fros ths original •^1*} by ths Council, fill to bs | lacsd such that ths^ avsrags #.k« hs saintaiosd at 9*. All land altsrations shall taks (lacs 39 fros ths adjaesat vatland arsaa. ILiat of lachibits Exhibit A • Exhibit B * Exhibit C ~ Exhibit D Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G • Exhibit B - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - A|;(.lication Flat Map Fropsrty Ownsrs List Staff ntons to Council Bsviswinq Application IllOl Cook*s Sketch of a Typical Cross Section Braun Enginssring Latter Datsd 9/28/07 Proposed Fill Sits - Plan Cross Section East/Msst Cross Section Morth/South ^ Resolution 12192 Approving Original Conditional Ome fersit ^ Th.*.^^nt**.Vp.«r.<l b«for. th. Couneil at thair July 11th ■Mtln9 r.qu..ting an .atanaion of th. original conditional ua. P*r»iV_. advised the Council that an extension could be granted for a period of 30 to 60 days but asked the applicant to define the status of the c^^cject. Mr. EisJnger confiroed that nothing had begun a® y«t. could he conceive that the project could be for that fact, by the end of November. Staff advised the council that applicant's best option would be to file e renewal application of the original conditional use perult, providing no changes from th^e original application, as it was clear, Mr. Eisinger would require another complete total fill project of 100#000 cubic yards. The applicant presen application #1310, a renewal conditional use permit, without any changes from the original application sul»iitted over a year ago. •#1 j ^ '.•■'S.V. ■1- i.A;: Sofiing Fll# II August 8. 1981 Page 2 of 3 Wtmsmrnl of App The origi dusip) site on •aximum of 10 project (revi CoBMilsiion am cubic yards m tha existing < take place 8 surrounds the Reiolutl< with the appl project will City ataff*a i la not clear property prio that Involve weatarn part has rem concerned thi tlM Where ex tise. There ' the project, reeponsible unattended f directed to k or to immedil area and sead once the f i 1 the hauling Park Construe of the applic If any < information to tha maatii Staff Rooobm To appr< Eisinger for findings and based on the the follow! follows: That at unatten da' trator avard ing I uae |;erBit tot fill HI03 approved by the Ling of approximately roperty - forirer dump application approved ige height of fill to :e place 35* from the lication 11103 tion 87 Conditional Use Permit Bir July 11th meeting 1 use permit. Staff ed for a period of 30 :atu8 of the project, t, and that in no way ed within bO days, or sed the Council that I application of the jes from the original juire another year to Phe applicant presents , without any changes ago 1: "K. I. r m Jooimg File tl310 Hegost i. IfIt Page 1 of 1 The origimel coodltlooel us© permit approved tho flllingi of ^^to*a tfftmpi site o» the llelager property, total I log iMrovement •axirnom of 100.000 coble yard© of cleaii fill from then^i^t rreview the exlaiiho eievationa at tfw aw© laMlutlon .JIM tfe. It.lt. ®* Sa nil with th. .iclte.tioh aad .1.. .**. forth the .«ia.lln.» by *blch th. fill h« llifttolftoa bv Lho •BcUcBt. oodor tho •u.#c»l.lo« of tM Clty*.taff'* IhSiOCtloo.- Staff haa ra*la.od those original la Jot clear hw loo. tb. City -111 allow ...oaed earth Lrocerty prior to the final gradliigi and seeding. Conaider the «« the flllln, of . ir hl,h her. on County ■oadiloth. weJUrn tart of tho City. The fllllnfl be.an over a year «’® ‘J** ^::c.rh.d^^“^^-i^^^."VVi^^^r,^?o^v;t^ area and aeed iamaoiateiy. ■•y -4,* rh*rA eav be no del ay a la :s:v.»'ii*nV ‘of"^t*~t|rr. i"e ‘»srch;?oi:ro"n “m.%h«*Park Conatroctlon. Mr. Cannons should provide more oecxgrouna w« ► of the application. If any of th. new «mbera on tho Planning CoiiUaalon eeah aMitlonal tofor..tT/n or l.put on th. cart of ataff. He... contact >y of flea prior to the meeting. ®^"TS*ttr^‘t“ renewal conditional as. p.r«lt .Fpllcatlon of Howard"v “o.vA'"s inn?." ,’i^^r.^r,o.n;n.n;1■«??Vi^.“.? the following guideline be added to the new approval reaol f follows: That at no ti.o .ball any .action of fill i^f.^Vor unattended state at greater than 5:1 slopes and not seeded for o ____ days. s«| m , ♦ iiM ramSKMT 08 Fresc Freae tSK-JS jbiaaiimc Deaci IBQCrXBID I lo Comp: 2 3. Cert thia Cent< Stami on tl Cert: Topo site Cons' Flat Aa a any < The appl remember not been CertiCica Zoning Of AFPZ.1CART The appl requester unusual e the info knowledge Applicant OHHBBS 81 The owne] authorize agents, investigi Owner'a s Applicani Planning third Mo review m< unable t< authoriz Office oi ■ ^ 'ifI'KWf u-90^ -'1 i-.' I ling of th# fomr res in srss, to m 1-394 iaprovesent iptsd the Planning maxifliufli of 100,000 Base in hsight fro« all filling ttould rfstland area that Lterationa approved ; by which the fill supervision of the inal conditions. It th to remain on the der the application inty Road 6 in the ar ago and the berm a year. Staff is re may be lapses In for long periods of provided throughout lines for the staff 8 remain with fill f should either be >r further direction Inal grading of the IS are not valid, as may bo no delays in eprcsentative from ground on this phase lion seek additional act my office prior plication of Howard /ard, subject to the isolution 12192 and :’s contractor, that val resolution, as wed to remain in an lot seeded for over ■m 1 M 't.K * . . •: mmwn mm or iiorftfit Present toning DIstflet Present Use of Property IMsideAtial OtKer Ispecify! xMcmimcai or uqowt Describe re<piest in detnllt J. tlQiCTB! SOMmiliO mO) to Mcfc of tl» nuoo on tto above list elth no return address. ^pVgraph^ie survey (existing and proposed contours) if lend olterstions Involvo chsnges 4ft elevation (gradea). Ooaatructlcm plan. If applicable (see ataff for regulraaanta). ^*«s^Sdend«M to thia application# plaaao attach a aeparsie ilat of any other i^raooa y<w wish noMfied of this eppliceticw. ___ . • ./iV fh. applicant aa« Proparty Owrar ouat alpn t]»l*^------Zf- appiieatloa 'a not oem>lata if tha aboaa information has not been included. ________ CertifIcetloo by t^ing Department that Land Uaa ^plicaticm la ©gmplata toning officiala Signature _Date JkPPDXaynr*S 8X(»T(nB r^auired or knowledge . . kppilcaot'a slfnatura Data m SIGSATUSB thT^nVr haVaTy ackno. ladgaa and aqraaa to thia authorizad raaaonable jntry onto tha proparty by City •t*f<« ^““‘tant , aganta, comoi.alon tambira, and Council mambeca for purpoao. ot investigation and verifIcation of thia requesta ^ ruita > /P-Owner's signature . \ >. ----—--------------- uate > ~ unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent atte id in your place and advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change ?rior to the meeting. ClTl 09 wmwmrt i Site hddri Property 1 P I ease chi (for PleafO ati on requir< hPPLlCiyrr r • I Ramo hddr (if Ham# hddr Date £ (d - cc Reni aeti cmm hP lential tclfy) vithin 550* (you can obtaii it Financa A-€03 Oo^arnaan draaaad to aach of tha naiMi 1 1 ,• \ . L.. a oaed cofitoural if radaa). for raqulrements). land! tittach a aaparate liat of application. nis application. Flaaaa [ the abova information haa Application it conplate. Date information required or to pay all feea and/or cation, and certifies that to tha best of his/her Date 7-/‘?-9r iS> ■ v;-,;k application and further City staff, consultants, >mbers for purposes ot •1. Date >ffices 25 days before the Meetings are held on the present at all scheduled ricil. If an applicant is e arrangements to have an se the Building & Zoning fre^rty Jdwitlfleetlo* Mbar (r.I.O.I riMM check cam - or tf«r mmilttl~nTl 0,* hp,Hct 1 oa. eaty) ...t «at 0fUt ‘'xm tcinac* Ml required aonrey AFFblCMrr VaM fliQAt I ham I ipliMia (vorl)_____ JULC (if diffarMit than applioufitl City _ lip A Fliofia (Imm).. Ffi^a ________ Addxesi City liR a t.r.a rs.'nSy'*"’ cmutmmm 9' mm^mm-ma ^ mm^rnrnmm^ mm » mmm»mm .. COaOZTKMAL Oil mUT8 > Eenawal tea - 1/2 Currant Fee» Double Currant ApplicatiiHAfter-tl»-Fact Fee 1100.00 a) tiso.oo b) *130.00 e) $250.00 d) $200.00 f) Fee Institutional (church, a«nQol, etCtS Duplex Cr^it/Bldg Com»rcUl/In<Ju»trl«l Om l^nd Alteration Grading andi filling - designated wetland o " floodplain ^ ^ ^ Otadin, and flllliw * 101 cu. yd. or Bora . Cradln9r aoawall. rotolnlng walla within 75 ' of lakeshoro PftD/PZD - ••• schedule orms APFxacATioas _____ $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 3;;;;;;;;;;;^ $250.00 _ _ _ $100^.00 Cosmiercia^ Site Plan Review <♦ consultant fee*) vacation Eaaener.t vacation ^0.Mnt Vacation With $ubdivialon Resoning Appeala Other - see fee schedule / • CffJCl yvic‘ *!^ torrftot? ‘5 ' c * not Inclirfod'"^ Cl^-i Msaol ^ r»_ work)________ - * f,)i CA ip home)^ Zip ^ A..V.,; ^ (month/yoar) of land. Lon Fee I .noolr etc*I W-y'^ k-.;5.^.r.; asaPI: ' -y a n^ • daaignated wetland or Lng - 101 cu. yd. or more retaining walla within 75 m (+ consultant fees) Lvlsion I//: MJttctt illO) Reward lieieftf. Cendltieojil Oa# Rermit •* ioalsf Dietfi«|; - Rl*lt fmstXmmkt ftectiea of tRs {^Am «*y©r CraiNil Orono CRoftell Riffaire City MmimimtWitter RemliardaeR r' Jmmtmm A. rnmbnmtht Rvlidii^ Her *». inf »wMiwi*io» If, 20 - Cendttloftal Ree reoiit r«r fill «»d frediiif ijB escasa of 100 coRic yord*. for fill <*«Uon 10.«i - CoAOiUoMl Om rarait proc«hir« SiiRdivlaloo S IB) • 20 f'AA#> a ._, ^«^t.laiidfl. ••ibock fro» dooifnatao bM t0 b« miad - U.13 »e*« - Ponar Oop sit« fimmt of fill - ** ?*”*”**** JPpUcant 130,000 t« 200.00 cable yarda I iSw H.M, 1. • 1, .... UM ptmiDC., Mmt of Iftxliibito Exhibit A - Exhibit i - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit B - Exhibit r - Exhibit O - Exhibit H • Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit H > Exhibit N - Exhibit 0 - Exhibit P - Exhibit Q - Exhibit R - Application Plat Nap Proporty (h#nor Liat AchnoiflodQaBwnt ILattara Park CoaatructicHi Latter Dated 1/14/07 Park Conatruction Latter Dated 1/31/87 Ol.trlct tattar J/10/01 ^partaent of Environa»nt a Cneroy 3/18/87 Ninneaota P.C.A. Latter 3/20/87 N.C.N.D. Latter 3/23/87 Planning Coaaiiaaion Minutes 2/17/87 Cook Letter 4/15/87 Cook's Sketch of a Typical Section Saaple of Letter Sent to Reviewing Agencies on 5/5/87 Park Conatruction - Site leprovemint Plan fo? Proposed 200,000 Cubic Yards of Fill Section A-A Based on 200,000 Cubic Yards Section B-B Based on 200,000 Cubic Yards I PI: & u m tilin' May 7 Pag# Risto epara obtal the a wai < over 2 fe« 8 to Ravil •pprupgr of t fill lOOi appl up t (a f to ] rM< be I com dri Dep but par the ^Alnisirator souliVArd tionil Vmm Parmil; for fill tdura. t totback from dasioiiittoi to )0 cubic yard! )00 to 100,000 cubic yarda 12 aero area produces, /14/87 /31/87 otter 3/10/87 gy 3/18/87 /87 ng Agencies on 5/5/87 went Plan for Pill Lc Yards Lc Yards .i-?gb.7 '-M ftcmifif tii« tnoi May 7, IPiT Paf# 2 of 4 lliatory «* iProporty - w ^ tn lfS5 and ift IfJP throogti 1^70 «^rat«4 • evaratioti. I« I*’*. ^ vic«..T*r« lias denied. owr th# d<»p ••>« 1^“.. er*«le. to pU««J root of fill. • «•» o* ’* to • locboi of Clo.o fill Ot.r th. o«. 4«»P •»•• BrriM of Applicotiao * «r. ft.l»a.r propo... filUn, «• \* ft^Vh“’l-m oppro.Uot.Jy JOO.OOO e.^e *“,*, *^iblt. C « f), .d.Uinp o55r.41na. , ,?• ^T.V\o V..m t^ Ci^ il V.i r.VS. of thl. por.it. Th. V..“flit frS t^’.arroooaio, wotUm... II ---------- ^ ^ at the first foviee ^ *i*ft^*»eetlii9 the 100,000 cubic yards «®#nded pro^sal with plans for fillingapplicant's contractor submitted an aeenoec prop«««« up to 200,000 cubic yards.» J^VVfWV ^«aes«'» ------------- P..U. «hibit. ». 0. */V.ti»‘ ?ui:ihiVi.ViaVo i?%:rt;:."'s!sVi.‘ind s:;Va?h^ ..t.tu^. .tor.-.. th. .it. -».t h. fsaoved prior to filling. *. th. contr.ctor-. i*tj« be coopleted by the spring of lyss. Th. .ppuent ... V^ni:S$.rVnV.To\V.%hS\riV^.iVhVr IVl |S5inVV,"oVf1 rVnV'oVfor-.c for. of .,riooltur.l «... Th. DNR, M.P.C.A., "•""•P*" S™"*”"**^*''*’ D.p.ttMnt of *"’'i'°"***"*. or^.a.l.^c. for th. City if th. but th. DHK has provid.d „qmr. a p.r.lt but .ill not i..uo ?;."^™Vt‘uVtirS; ?Sy’’fo;:;ny .ct. o"n th. condition.! u.. por.it. pv 4Tm a P a 1 ',r 'ey ton May Pag thi thl dll COf an<i coi ifi< DS] rsi fi io sa ho ho CO PI bv U Cl •I ai Cl ll 81 P< Ci m g £ P f h rft'' and In 1958 through 1970 tid rofuaa). Tha applicant ir of oporatlon. in 1974# licanaa fros tha City but u *uch fill •xlit* today inchaa to approxiaataly ingar'a practica to placa B foraar duap aita •»Jth 5tainad froa tha 1-394 Bxhibita E t r), adviainp i^iew of thia paralt, Tha I uatlanda. (ingar propoaad 80»000 to I 20# 1987 maating tha al with plana for filling 1 up to tha 992 alavation anta would ranga froa 8 orad on tha aita muat ba ling ana final aaaalng will for the fill aita upon uae the area either aa a ural uea# :rict and Hcnnapin County xulra par®it raviawBe All fnce for the City if the >ermit but will not iaaua iditional use permit. toming fil# iilOl May 7# 1987 Pag# 3 of 4 Petar. »aa. are w«, UMte4 for the --»_•«*^12*0# aita. loth M.P.C.A. and tha 0apart*aot of *J^oJ5ducatha oaa of tha land for agricultural purpoaaa Si^taelnattoo, ewltlTatioo -ooW .iwtonger/wealiMi ih« range if no boildinga are inwoluad. foni May Page Ooun mi v/eVr “More thM e« iwerege » feet of fill. Tho ere. ehoold be lowoled. If coaneil hee the opportonity ‘® **'?he^ettrrMfc ^boiait ratantioo araaa and unawan topogr pny eenditicm of ground couar prouidaa potential of lMichat_s if-i liiociwaiidatiaB A. r I MM 1 ■ ■ 1 rm racoawandad approval of tha filling project hot il’t','.’.- IlatKLl^Md'fte^TeVdMno ’rTpVrVtion. City -e, con.ldetg^ •^proving a aaoond ataga fill project. t»*4ae* *.dh formal action on tha conditional use parnit, staff hasPrior to any fornaj. ac^io *-ha citv snoinaar's concern increese the potentiel du,p .ite now occupies e•urroonding wstlendc. Beoeober the l* sere ou«p portion of the eurroundlnq wetlende. St.ff -ill e.k for written Veoif! th'.iMMomlo^ on thUcell the agencies prior to your esetlng to poll their position on «- matter. Prior f’a aakina tha applicant for nora detailed surveying work and gredin^plen. .? thi ’ 4lnt in the revl«r. etefffro. th.'^ Council, if it i. Council*. i"‘ent to approve a conditl^ peroit. The Planning Co.nleelon he. ete^d th^ it need not r^^^^ final plans a. these final etagee eppeat oore appropriately plecea in hands of the reviewing staff. Al amsi fine and C4t Ift' )a 4♦ a i j * « 1 ■ a • 0 ler; ,t# ~ not# for th# o«n#r » ri#%r all prcfKMiod oaaa of of Environiiont and Enargy mral purpoaaa • produca inta^rity of ground covar >acaupa of unatabla ground ound dabrla. Conatruction nd dangar of axpXoaioni. bias with uaa aa a driving »laca excaaaiva anounti of tha additional land could k riaa in tha aurroundlng :o fill tha araa but with ahould ba lavalad. ■ alta, note tha nany pot rha currant topography and Laachata. il of tha filling projact 1 completad within a yaar«i|™ reapondad in good faith to , tha City ma^ conaidar tal uaa parnit, ataff hai B City Engineer'a concarn 1 placad on tha dunp aitc I to mova out into tha lump aita now occupiaa a ir our racorda but wo will 1 thalr poaition on thia^ tailed aurveying work and Koka conceptual direction •prove a conditional uae : it need not review the »ropriately placed in the ■/‘H • I 4 I ^ . . ./■ ; I I ■ WD<# Sonlag filv §1103 nay 1. IW rage 4 of « {(josacil Acftiiiai “ cptioma of JUitJLoBi ■t«ff Mail* Cornell •• >1 To don* tbo eonditloool an# porolt o< *^|?»*ipproBrloto*’ CoMlaiiOO ond to diroct otof* to diolt oppropr*. •al To dony tb# eond 111 onoi b»o_ P*»■ 1 ^f to diaft appropriato for £1^ for for-1 acUoo at poor May «tb -oatlnT. •I fo conceptually approve the eonditi^l s»rmifc Oil I a 2. propoaod zaoeMendod by Plannlny O ilaaion tni ataff i and to dlr.ct tb*city prior to fora*i action on tb* raaidltlooal o*a panu^ bj ratio* BediaMntation and eroaioci plan •.*» follow the following guldelinea a) »llt fanea *"***’^**^ “" ad^Vof^thVnlr\\"(*^^^ «u:l"t2 t^*-?a'a tb. dapth Vf a.i.ting fill (»«aM U0'«* - 40*5-«i.-)l. b) Stakod hay balee when neceeeery g\ Type of ground cover. Schedule of fill activltiell nm.: a) Time periodi b) Plan for filling - nag«nt - phnsadi B.ator.tion of ground covor - dlnturbad raatored within 30 daya.c) areas muat ba . 4 «*«ntL*B Contractor to execute a Developer'a J;ir«iMnt p«t n l.ttor of cr.dlt to covor final grading nnd seeding if proje<‘t is abandoned.m i i f ve# Thi St P*cu Aa PJ Si di 81 •1 ai pi T1 il r« V-TT ■jr.- -i* ,V as follow*I by applicant or aa to draft appropriat# 26th abating. nit aai I Information to th* nit by tha Councilt irate alavation* of ^a not to axcaad 5tl following guidalina*i It in from tha top of of tha marah (972*) |m||| I (982*) plu* 5 tmrntmm iturbed areas must ba "■'M ixecute a Developer** er final grading and I4 ■ "5- • *1, <V ' fbf flayof Crabafe Ofeno Council Namibarii City hdmiaiotrator Bamhardsoa t DATii iOBJl jaamia A. mabuatb. timing Admimistrator Jana 1« 1987 •118) toward lisiiigar* )249 Haysata Had Cttiditiomal Qa# Mrmit •• tasolutiM Uat of fcdiibitat - A - Bfaon Imgiaaaring tatter t - Council totlca of Actloa ■BbBitt«d tbB aalatlB* t*«t d»t« of 1»74 to tbo otiflioAi •aqlnoorln9 fii» that eoadoetod tha taata. ■aalaa tahibit A. Braaa Baqlaaarlaq atatai as follovat •it is oar oplaloa that tha propoaad addltloa ol of alnaral aoll aboaa tha top of tha aaiatlnq landflil gtadaa praaonta a aary alight ria» of ahaar falluxa. ftia following raaaon* are citedi 1. fast exparlanca with similar landfill .ite* tituatad 2^^*'E*'l*tinV*landf i 11 material probably po**a»*a* hi^ internal ai^la of friction and a higri *haar *trangth ba*ad T sJJttliSlnt^t^^V occurred over tha pa*t )0 year* will TiIncase the *haar atrangth of the upper tone Of oi^^i^ .o?lV.nd\i*l^ laa.an rl.A of .h.ar a* a result of placing m additional *urcharge load. staff ha. -ot olth both El.ln,ar aadproparatoty atapa raqult.d »c that tha patait at th. loo.uou cubic yard level may be approved by council. A. Braun to9in..rln9 fTf“t«! determine if there i* en abnormal rate of settlement. 6t.ff ha. *A>Vur'.ThaV fi^r'g^Tfn^ and*7Mdlng wiil ba coapleted .van if the fill project as proposed is not realised . Th. Bngineer-a r.coa-endation. inspection schedule and monitoring fil P j referenced in this resolution. toning Fi) dune it l^ fage 2 Gannon hSi 8aulings imaginad. project • feel a aacesaar' iuch tmq\ fha attac at 100p0( •hall be ei this I of the 1 contractf Ivd. - John Gannon haa ;o tha original tview Exhibit Kt t- ion of fiva faat xiating -TiKinTT ir failura." LI aitaa aituatad Ly posaaaaaa high ear atrangth baaad past 30 yaara will .he upper aona of laar aa a raault of diacuaa the final t at the lOOfOOO Bk that monitoring I of the fill area, ►on Inapectiona to ement. [uire a developer's that final grading fill project aa erosion control# (Ct have also been •- v->^. . • -.j: . . toftifig Wilm IllOJ Jttfi# If 1®®^ page 3 - . ^^ •ifcAt BAvina cfuataaKBrs gat first clalai on Cannon ba» and^ot as intanaa as first *n« the 100.000 cubic yard iaaginad. Cannon gotb liaingar and Gannon project vill •«, eccaptabla* it •« axtanaion i» for tna proc.dural steps for •uch raqoaita. «. .»..«« “■> •C iOO.OOO •“1**^1 *^? 0* S f.*t. «>• ewjfuion. Shall be limited to ^^iSSeMandad by staff in ooiiiidaration l\ .ppucnt «a .pplic.»t . (^ntractor . COQStniCtilM 7f00 nmmch Hinn<>poli»y KM 55412 .• ■ . :» *>• Bitw fNOmcCKNO Till •iJ I. U\ll i|2ii '* r.o. io« 35101 »pl«., IQI 55435 t013) 941-5400 Mr. Cinnofi 73-157 ^^XRluiXiiG C^IMXOM Addition of rill to CMlitifi^ LoAdflll Ooutli of TB-12 at Clatton Uka QronOf Minnaaota •t«B^rd*^^(nVtrM’loo" t««t* hori****^n.^*'* inforaatlon (rea thr«« 1»7J. rVI^tto “• P.rfor«id In v»"u! Placmant th«t i« procoa^ The *i?» ‘h* wMltlonai flU fill araa will ba caua<» aalatlng land- tba undarlfing organic aolla. * poaalbla failura lot© fill araa in^l973%nJo^tarad^Ii^\^^ i” pj'opoaad land- daptha ranging fron 22 faat frott tha aurfaca to landfill i#ai not axtandad aaat ** ondaratand that tha dapictad on tha attachad e^*lf propoaad landfill araa aa the area of tha axiatino landfillcondltiona in bacauaa tha araa la baan aaaumad aiailar of the organic aoila lively va*V* ••tlandi although depths thU *ir»t filled in to place additional fill '^J.r Jh!* < indicated your deaire will conaiat of a uni fora •*i®ting landfill araa which axiating surface elavations in winaral fill over thaV uj^iBce aiavationa in the present landfill area. mu *Smm, Co^. fNawtim / son s WO M*T£WAi.a r 'm h . 'T •-. f dUi t ii «UH «*PI1fT*: 9.0. Box SSlOi nplm., tm 5S43S («12> 941-5400 m ung opinioh » of Fill to ig Landfill TH-12 at I Lake linneaotft ition froifi three orroed in April, additional fill >ere of the City i existing laad- ble failure into t proposed land- i the surface to (rstand that the Landfill area as 1 conditions in assumed similar although depths first filled in ted your desire 'ill area which fill over the 1 area. A bi. ~VZ 13-157 Fart Oottstreetlon -I-Nay 31. lill foe Indicated that tlie bottom of the emieting landfill ■ateriai If at about elevaiioo 9i0». The existing surface aleeatloa of toe undisturbed wetland area Is at about eleeaiiwi 912* feet. th«s 4-foot difference In elevation probably repfesents what teould expect to be the tmo^nz of settleoent that baa resultadl frtfi toe weight of tbo existing landfill natarial coapreasing the organic subsoils balou. foe indicated that the existing landfill natarial la about 14 foot thick. Judging Iron the langth of tina that the aaiatlng 1. ndflll natarial haa baan in plate, and your ladlcatlon that thura have bean ao prawious atablllty problana. It ia oar opiaioa that the proposed addition of 5 feat of ninaral aoll sboea the top of the axiating landfill gradaa prasaota a wary alight risk of ahaar failure. Our experlsnca with prolecta where edditlonal fill Is placed above axiating landfill natariala above swaM ^poaita Ml rttuitad in additional sattlaanat, but no ahaar falluraa. con; dtition of the axiating landfill natarial la auch that it probably poaaaaaas a rather high intarnal angla of frictic^ and h rather high shear strength. toa aattlanant that haa occurred over the peat 30 yaara has also iocraaaad the shear atrangth of the upper sons of organic aoila which lasaaoa the risk of or pttocHiny failure aa a result of plseing an additional surchargo load. Thus, bassd on this infomatioo. it is our opi nion that the addition of 5 fast of fill over the area prsaanta a very slight risk of snbanknent fsllure. It should be noted thst soil borings with power sguiptant have not bean taken in the existing landfill sfsa to svsluats the con- position and strength of the existing Isndfill natsrisl and strengths end depths of the underlying organic soils. If the sssusiptlons wa have sada ara inaccurata# our avaluation of the potantlsl risk nay naad to te rs-avsiuatad. Additional borings and tests st this tiu» do not sppssr wsrrsntad for tho 9r^»hg planned. Howavsr, st a sinisua, wa reconn end that prior to placing any fill, ssvarsl settlenent nonitoring pistes m Ifistsllsd in various srsai, preferably around the •sistirm landfill ll»4tSf ar.d that thm acklltlonal fill than ^ placed in two stages of 2 1/2 fast par stag* • Bat%#ssn lifts, the nonitoring plstss should be referenced to aid rats of ssttlsnant caused by the addition of new fill. Possibly a period of one to four weeks should be set ssida bstwaan staged fill applications to allow nors time for nonitoring the platss. If the additional ninaral fill sxtsnda over areas thst srs pre sently virgin wetland, the risk of smbsnknent failure Is atgniCl- cantly higher and a cnch more controlled filling technique win be appropriate. t: I.BR/iun e;'j<J5pr^ f i« i ♦ I f he f onteni mm tnmiu* tv-; \ Kay 2ir 1M1 landfill Aatarial rfaea alavation oZ ivation 912± faat. rapraaants what «pb that has rasoltad lal compreaaing th« B existinf landfill axlating Undflll on that thara hava r opinion that th# »ova tha top of tha .ght risk of ahaar additional fill la twaaiD dapoaita hit lar failuraa. tha 1 ia auch that it e of friction and a that haa occurrad I ahaar atrangth of i tha riak of ahaar ing an additional ton, it ia our opi- tha araa praaanta a 1 )war aquipi'ant hava o avaluata tha con* LX matarial and tha Uc aoila. If tha evaluation of tha Additional boringa :ad for the grading send that prior to itoring plataa be d tha adgaa of tha ional fill than be Betwaan lifta» tha d in avaluating tha new fill. Poaaibly Lsido betwaan ataged loring the plates. reaa that are pra- railure Is signifi- ing technique will iMfim ] I r <NI"tf-im nj:.■M- iark Qpiia tract toil i*way ifil tarwicaa parforaad by the gadteehnlcal (R^inaara for thia project lhava bean coodoctad la a ■aasar eoaaiatant with that lawal of care and tktll ordlearlly «««rcia#d br eaebefa of the pfolacilOfl corrantly practicliif in thla area f»dar aioilar bodpat and raatraiata. Po warranty, axpraiaed or lepliad, lb iMda It ia a plaaaura parfoniiaq tbeaa aarvicaa for yoa, tboold yooi ibaea any dtuaitloof rtoaidiftf tbia coriaapoodaaca• plaaa# eoataci mi at yoar cma^nianca. iTEC/JJCffaei AttachPaati ikateb Tlia ar Pwa nwrar ew m Orw 1^ ¥aff truly ymmiit •Mini Ml t • 4 li {r tisf iMii. inCi WtUlMi R. Cody Baaior laglnaar , p.i. Cral tor of r., f, inaa ■i2 tfaaaaiia f I - m : f ^r^ .- *r~ m mm aOap"*w a tattf e»«w« mi fc rRMtifit______________________________ .‘r .i4 % uinm 1 'ft i .7 m j m,:•Ar ;iL h« AppllcAnt") it Itvtrd within tht bed at follow#I p 116, Range 23, overnment Lot 1 the South lint of It from ttid Bttt .02 ftet to South line to tfett line ,o Northerly lint :e Southeasterly 3t 1 thence North City of Orono for 00 cubic yards of ' 12 acres in arte on 19 6 20. Fill L it maintained at from the adjacent f Council of Orono, e #1103. ural Residential Lesion reviewed nanimous approval owing findings: S- lei IS-' 0 m Mcba-Jt-' ' 4vl ■M Citv of OIFI.OINO RtSOtUTlOlC OP f Hi mY COUNCH. fid aita ____ • I The Department of Rateral Resources. IlifiAesote Pollutlofl Control agency. Mennepio County Departmefit of Rnvlro»*»ent and Bnergy, Nennepin Conservation District, and Ninnehane Cteeli tretershed District find that the appllcatloii ae proposed will have no negative Impact on the suffrounding wetlands cr intersecting drelnageway. !b} The adjacent property ownere have been edvia^ of the ippllcent*e propose 1 end none have voiced objection or submitted written oppoeiti«a to the City. cl The application as modified by the Planning CobPisslon will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or meterlelly injurioue to properties or improvementa in the vicinity. t. Sraun Bngineering in a lettar dated Nay 36, If63 has ^ined as follows regarding the plecement of approsimeteiy 100,000 cubic yards of fill over a former dump sitei ^ •... it is our opinion that the addition of 5 feat of fill, ovar tha area preseota e very slight risM of enbenkment failure.* 5. The City Council hae considered this application including tha findings and recoamendstions of the Planning Commiasion# reports by staff and commenta of tha applicant and the effect of the proposed os# on the health, safety and welfare of tha inlty. 6. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Permit to allow the filling of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill within th# Ar#A MB d#f in#d by th# Orcno Bt.Btt wl 11 not bo dotrioontol to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pots a fire hasard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it dapraciata •urroundin^ property voluoo ondl thot tbo proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the toning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. O^CLDSIONS, ORDER A1 OCNIDITlCffS upon one or more of the findings noted above, Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal toning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 k 20 to permit the placing of 100,000 cubic yards of fill within an area approved by the Orono staff, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 ^^UligiPpil ■A ! " ii, -...: jit'. . •• '■■ :' '■^- ■^r BBOta Pollution of Environment , end Hlni.ehana application at ^he surrounding adviaed of thf d objection or ■ling Coemiation ilth, safety or propertiea or B7 has opined aa y 100,000 cubic 5 feet of fill Ic of enbankment ation including ing Commiasion, nd the effect of welfare of thr. onal Use Permit aan fill within detrimental to »lic, would not azard or other it depreciate level of use of d objectives of ty oted above, the Use Permit per & 20 to permit area approved by !iil mf W . .'rt-fc V^"■ city of OHO.no RliOtUTim OP IMS CITV COUBiCit m 21^2 _______ 1. Prior to the helling of fill to tho site the epplicent or applicooi*! agent oiet aohmit the followingt el Si* croee aectioea of ijiSeting topography. h) Pin . I grading end troaion Control plan dealgmating the follovlngt 1) tide eiopoe Sil. ^ ^ . ms%% 2) One percent elope to bo auiintaii^ within Inner fill J| silt fence installed 30 to 15 foot from eatian^ *t S72 elavation • no land *ltaratii»e allowod within 2i feet of wetland. ^ ^ ^ 4) average height of fill to ho meintained at 5 5) Monitoring plates to he inatelled as raguirad fe? the City Eagineer. e cl laecuted Oevelopar’e Agreesent and approprlata ae^rity to inaure final grading and saedlng ^ ooa^letad. Letter of Credit muat be written for 150 por^nt of the estimated o^t of the improv«ient. realised. to hauling any fill to the site Park Construction must arrange for e preconstruction meeting with the * final aubaUittals and tentative hauling schedule. the public interest to cease ell hauling to the conditional us. p.r«it shall b. tsrainsted iBmedistely and tha applicant shall complete the final grading and seeding of the entire disturbed area. conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (June 8, 1988). , ,Paae 3 of 5 •r •..iaA cn 1117, f f^t^hy 4M he epplicint or r. designating the rithin inner fill from wetland at X lowed within 2« ned at 5 feet, as required hjf roprlate security , 1 project le not n for 150 percent 1,000 cubic yards. ;>e ratio has been sdvising the City E> that staff can »ach month. Prior tion must arrange ^ff to review all 0 the sit© upon lity created by all not proceed lequate time to to the Council 3S that it is in the cite, this diately and the 1 seeding of the r with the property must be completed al or the special that date (June 8, TV'*-r mi r -H,seaSilhi-.-- ■* S;,,is -i «■' f Citv Of ORONO nfSOiUtlOM O, TMC CITV COMKIi. NCK am______ •. vtel.tloa of o* Don-evai^ll.iic* with «i»T ®< t^® I**"* cooditioma of this teaolutioii ehal I coostitute a violation of th«| toning CoAm, sMll aotooatically terminate any aythorlty granted! terelB, and shall be pwaiaha^le as s mitdameanor. V. th* and.i.l9n.a o*m*r h«. r.hd, ***/*^J,t’'f?* to the terms of this resoletion and on behalf of himself# hia heirs, ioccessors and sssigns. hereby agrees to the recording Of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. 1117 « f hdoptedi by the Orono City Council on thla ith day of June, a ♦ ;iKfT^mn. '(fityfl.r CxM :n Mayor WrSpSriy r(8)y J^jhAA 4 of i :y- -V ■ 3 s 5TAT1 01 COUNTS i on thii before i appeared the pel instrusN hia (th< STATE C COUNTY On thil a Notai personl and ac (their; >?. ONO i COUNCIL i any of tha tanii Ltut® a violation of thai tm any authority grantad anaanor. stood and haraby agraas bahalf of hinsalf* hit :aas to tha racording of tha proparty. >n this Sth day of Juhtf Ic, Mayor 1 *-r I I'ti h • . 4r-r\ I City of ORONO NffOLUTION Of TH€ CiTV COUNCIL Na__nri fTATE or HimaoTS. > I ss. (srii )fti ^ On this llth day of ______________________________ -* ind lo] •p^r«4 ■oM.rd r tha parsonisi d th.t iw. (th.y) th* —• •• his Ithalrl froa act mnd daad itnoim to to ba n and who asacutad tha foragolng ___k__________^ Oi la A m satMA Si Si .* 4i 9/B/92 m¥ dOHMU^filON SXPIBBI SfAfB Of HllWESOTA ) )ss« counry or HEMUsris ) -w. %'H (their) free act and daad. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 mmm^. ______» 19&2_ ', personally to noe to be le foregoing S the same aa 8 , before me iTly appeared B to be the nginstrument, same as hit ;s ; f-4( pssEvi';:-5:-:V:r m r u :■ ■■%. > . ii'fHp-w ?i ; •f- iv fOl Planning CoMilaeion Cbairmen Pel ley Plaitfting Commiaaioe Pepfeere City Mmlniatiator Pembardaco fW»it HIciiael Caffrcm. beat. PlenMof » MmlnlaUetdr HbTfi biigvat 11, Ifii SOPJt illll Jobn a iuaan Piurdyi lf?P ragerneaa Point ^«d variance - Public luring umakTimt Peneeal and reviaiona of varianeei granted in If IS to oooatmct additlMa to reaidofiee* ugOlRlDi lM% and hardcover. 1C0IVQ pxsrmxCTi Ui^lC. ainge fanllyt l/J acre, aewred list op BUUPl^ » Applicatiofi - Plat Hap end bardcover peait ion paper PrM>erty Cwnera Liat ffpdate^ Survey with Perdcover Celcoletlone Averege Lakeabore Setback Diagram propoaed Addition Plana fiet Bardcover Beviaion Plan at Addition l^etlofi Previous Variance Approval Peaolutlon iliK Previous Hardcover Bevlee. lfS5 ffCKfllBST PACTS! 1 Tn iftfiS the Council approved variances for hardcover in the ©’• H. .h TV-JSO* ien.r Qi.ntia .pprov.l for .ddiUor. -Mch partially IScr*«:tbI2 mo tr*0.-*7V avaraf la.a.hora HttUt the eppllcants* phased plan of additiona, the variance reviaed the additiona haa expired. Alto, ^^* **^^^ J^telv SI* \.V.i^horlr :h.r.r. th. clc...t pomt Of th. axl.tin, hou.a 1. approxlcately 55' from the ahoreline. 2. Tha applicant, have r««>v.« pl.atlc froa virtually all of the t>« axl.tin, rockbida, and h.va r.pl.c.d it -ith * inspection by Staff directly after a f, ,e ground. fabVic definitely allovs witr^abr^Current hardcover percentages, excluding the rockbe them, are as follovst 0* - 75*J 75* -25C 15.41 (1213 sq. ft.J 19.11 (1689 eq. ft.) ^*.r f'---J n toning file August 11* Paage 2 of If the Cou hardcover. 3. T^ dlatance p topography property ov 4. Th their requs that floor aubatant ia fuggeated fc 5. T hardcover ■ houaa, prof larger aqui approved f< used, and % hits the e: directed tc DISCUSSION As of reached fo review of included t position ri To da the 1985 V that lands will meet maintained taken a c landscape because 1 maintenanc< Work!: fabric are hardcover Notwlthsta encroachm< City has c itrator in 1985, setback. 3cover in the 0*» which partially ones. Because of Lowing certain c£ aightly revised pproximately 51* existing house is ly all of the pre- .e fabric. A site that the permeable I into Mie ground, with tabric under Sofiing file 11 111 11, 19tt fsag# f of I If tfc« CovncI 1 contiaues to iieat eseb f©cklwitfe/^roeeble fabric aa hardcover, the percentaoea are as followat a* - 21.it 11208 sq. ft.I 75* -250*1 21.21 <2191 aq. ft. I 1. Tlia proposed addition ancroachaa approalaately 10* additional diatanca oaat tha avarsga lakaahore setback line. Bowavar, duei to topofrsphf and alta layoai, bo lake viewa anloyad by altber adjacent pf^rty owner will be decreased due to the proposed ^ItSon. 4, The applicants have qiven no written justlfIcetlon or MrdsMp lor fhelr request to expatid the house toward the **ka. ?*)**^^*^*! that floor layout of the house, topoqrs|d»y genarelly eloping *1*" sttbstsntiel nstursl screening elong the we»t leleshore. night eii oe suggested by the ^,pilcsnts es juetificetlon for the request. 5. The V rrent proposal would require e revision to the hardcover ns previously approved for this property, eince the exJeting house, proposed addition end Iskeshore deck end eteire in total conprise s Isruer square footeci of pernenent structural hardcover then was previously th. 0--7J' tb. tb.t «-• used, and which nay still be valid, is »hst the bulk of hits the existing house end propoved addition generally flows or can be directed to flow eastward through the front yard axes. Dl»:USSIO|it As of this writing, applicants were out of town and reachad for diacusalon of the project. The review of this property wee quite rigorous, and Included e letter fron that previous application which states their position regarding hardcover. To d.t., the .pplic.nt. h.v. co.plled with tli» l.tt.t end Int.nt of th. 1985 v.ri.nce ipprovel. City St.ff contlnu. to eupport the conc.^ that land.cap. bode underlain by p.ri>..bl., gTOtechnlcal ***>«^‘' will »e.t th. intent of th. h.rdcov.r ordinance ‘V P*? P*J “•“‘J maintained. The applicant is advised that the current C ^ under taken a conservative position on th© use of permeable K.irftf'rtver l.ndac.po areas, and generally continue# to treat auch area# aa hardcover, because it is virtually i.poe.ible for C*ty Staff to enforce th maintenance of those areas ss non-hardcover. Working under the assumption that the applicants* landscape areas with fabric are not hardcover, the current proposal results if* an increase in hardcover In the 0*-75* tone over what was previously - Notwithstandi*>g the hardcover issue, the proposal does ask for additional encroachment n*iar the lake on the west side, within the 0 - . . City has generally encouraged property owners in similar situations t Sonifi9 Fil* 11311 August Ilf 1968 FAg« 3 ot 3 eoftitmct ncv additions cither outside the 0'*7S* sons or no closer to tho lake than the esistinq house. There is no question that this property has unique circuestances coepared to cost other lakeshore in Orono» but is certainly typical of other Pagernest Folnt properties that have lake on both ends of the lot. Looking at the other variances granted for properties "up and down the line* from Purdy's# the addition of above-grade structure closer to the vest lakeshore than the existing house has no precedent since a<f^tron of the setback in IHtTI Certainly# a file search could likely reveal a few such approvals in other areas of the City since 1975# but it would be unusual in this imediate neighborhood. STApp jtBaMiimDATxoa Pro® the standpoint of hardcover and runoff# it would seen that the proposed additions can be constructed such that roof drainage can be directed eastward, and with the use of permeable fabric rather than plastic under decorative rockfcmds# rsinfall infiltration can be eaxieised, hence this addition can be completed in a manner that will meet the hardcover intent of Resolution 11814, if not the actus 1 percentages previously approved. Prom the standpoint of view encroachment due to additional above-grade structure in the average lakeshore setback sons# the proposed addition will have an insignificant effect on views currently enjoyed by neighbors. Prom the standpoint that this addition will craate additional above-grade structure closer to the west Iskeshore than the existing house# this would be an unprecedented approval in the immediate neighborhood. Planning Commission must determine whether a reasonable hardship exists and whether the lakeshore setback variance is justified. If the Planning Comniasion recommends approval# Staff would suggest conditioning that approval on limiting the height of the structure to just the single story proposed at this time# and that all roof drainage be directed to the east side of the property. Planning Commission may also wish to consider structural trade-offs of the various sheds on the property, not only west of the house# but at the lakeshore east of Pagerness Point Road# which according to plat maps, is still “no-man's-land*. r* i or no closer to the hat this property has ore in Orono# but is les that have lake on riances granted for dition of above-grad# xistinq house has no Certainly# a file ther areas of the City neighborhood. -i: t would seen that the roof drainage can be Lc rather than plastic n be anaxiinized# hence 1 meet the hardcover rcentages previously dditional above-grade proposed addition will ad by neighbors. Frcxn litional above-grade ;lng house# this would ghborhood. Planning lip exists and whether a Planning Commission ling that approval on gle story proposed at > the east side of the ructuraX trade-offs of the house# but at the rding to plat maps# is iX 0""■ - i;. r <• ;■■■' ^ X:iA m '%• I 4'* P 1tilt OP 0«0«B - VARlMCS fcPFWCATlW ^ Initl.l fcppUctl^ r(SSO.OO per each additicmai varaneei j Renewal Variance Pee $75.00 f # — (no change from originel appllcatl^I lifter-the-fact Feet (Double applicati<»i ■4 'i i? r mw-t3 Bhlir ' i - mWESTT LOCATIOO Site Address t. Property Identification mfflber (P.X.D.) . Please check one • Property —»^^^ebetract or torrans? :r: mmma v-i i.iV Safe e Attach legal description to applicaticai if not inclined tfo.X required survey. _______—«-n__—----------—— ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _ 6oir:L, phoo" hwtfc) »^y- -------» ------------- j ' a Address s Hi j owm (if different than applicant) Phone (home) —------ Phone (work)_ _ _ _ -Hame Addresst Cityi Z ip I Date Property Acquired (month/year) 1 (do) (do not) also own the W PiOPBRITfPlSBVr 08B CH Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential other (specify) OWCMFTIOi or BBQOBST Con.tructlon Co.t t_3U^ De.ctibe r«iu«.t in i = f-u rf. /y7;y>->,. VARIAHOK BBQOISXD Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other _ _ _ _ _ Lot Width Front ■er ?(___ Hardcover Side ^^-""^^ear) b::. IRARDSBIP DOSCI cnf of RIPTH Desc Code mm' RBQUIBS) 1. comp 2. d. 7. 8. Cert this 348- Stai nami obti Cert Top< in • Pla As any Add Tho ApP remembe: informat Csrtlfic Zoning ( APPLICAI The api request unusual the ini knowied Applies 0W1IER8 The owi author! agents# tion ar owner' I Applic. planni third review unable author Office i .i m mm W A f t r;«n«s iFiff ■•■' -'frf ; <‘:i i 7^33 v'i orv i «/ # • ^ 1. i 1r-^ A JL w ». • V'V f/><t 'Ou 4c;V- ^ ztp*_33cii ) zip: month/y«ar) nd. Residential cost over ^-^^ear) *L Wtx- JlMiiiii h.rd.Mp .r pr.ctic.I “JorccEon. of «<>"»"« r«ya.tt«.«._,V«‘ljn ij 'S'fs. w. sr. ast; .Vdro.« obt»ln*d with proporty ^^Vdcover •• roquifOd. V„;,^V7..\\%\t',‘7o-^Propc..d •X...ti«.. .* «y CK.",.. ^ , Mpor.t. li*t of Si*In .5d.nduo to th‘*^W““Vt1d o^f “l. .ppUcntion. ,ny oth.r p.r^» ^ueitod by City .t.ff*________________ Pm- -. K:;^ "fo^tlon h.s not boon ..................................................................................................... - — — _ _____A. l/nriAnCft ADpliCfit low Mi?"%p It that^ariai Cemii'io^-b'w** ---------- I M/ i W zoning Official*• —■/-------------------------------------------------------- ippucwrrs sicm«KK „,nvid« ail information f*1 “*'*^z®!! unuaual eapenaaa "j,%rua and corract to tha beat ot the information suppliaa i knoviledge. * o Applicant's Signature Data 7-(^ ^rctnVr^lf^y acbowledge. c“F?y“aVaVfr c^^.u^tan^^^^ tion and verification of this ^^ j Owner's Signature K’ ^ Im "Date owner B £>xgnatui.«' ---------^---------------------—------------ f^rt% the ;;;u7a;;';7s;'ra;v;vr^'»^Tty;^ ^J.r.d'^lnd'^^o^eTch month": c:u^cri!"‘l? Vn aPPli-«‘ ^ review meetings of pl^a make arrangements to _ ij^q unable to attend a scheduled meet 9 P ^^ise the Building * Zo*' ^ authorized agent attend in your place and to Office of this change prior to the meeting. mr m:i r -•■•■1^ .• • 4 * Tat liaifQr liar Rf: Ohr Hank yvhavt CQnctrfwi9 tN iff Jing builtfl Many rtaptcti tfiatrtttfS ill major inconva Gilding ptrm opportunity t« can bt applitf ittMing to imi Wt btUa continui to b< protf ct tha qi ovtrbuilding i lirat part ol ‘ II yogi landfcaping I y resulting fr^^trict //cVv/—:rm j compliance with Zoning n 150* (you must obtain nance A-603 Govt Center Irecaed to eac^ f* ‘Jo IS (uae address labels -ulations as required* Ovations) if any changes :ach a separate list of Dlication. :aff. _____________ ; application. Please complete if the above application is complete. Date formation required or o pay all fees tio^k, and /h2ro the best of his/her Date r purposes of investiga- Date .ces 25 days before the Btings are hold on the sent at all scheduled 1, If an applicant is rrangements to have an the Building & Zoning f.mm 1st MifV «ai7 CBiOif »ts*sf* s* »*0weCltf Cttjncil Qir C##SStlans US liSYS Stte tfM »f Ow Dty Mng ASmvstVstar Is wrtft tut nsls St^initsn s« what cor^tttutti harScsvtr 4or the masott e< Itf SuUSms streiti. Wt Ittl ilrerflf #i*t Sit currtet Stivutten tot In star reipscH. incomittent <*iti e»t prtwmiiS imtnt <N fSs srStnsnct . lii iff SiilrttttS #iat tif vtfutnsti el the ostent Stitmtien el harScevef tMiH i •tier Seenwenienct ler ut tnd will aSS tlgnillctntly to the eesi d tenrinf • Suil^r^ eensit. Wt n^suM tmctrely Hope tfist ^ Ceisvil will tt^ thlf oppertunlt? to titair* tnS dtrily IN prtie nt Stiinttton el NrScevtr so it cm St AdplitS l*if ly and imifermly to eth^ rsstStnts el our arts who sfv •tfl^ to isprevt tNir ho«f t. %k NUf ¥t that Vh9 purpott d IN NrScovtf rtstrictioni It* and thmM codirtit to N» lo U) pffvtnt iictstlvt run-dl Into ^ IsN and protect IN quality d ^it rtcrtational rtwurtf; and <21 to control ovtfbul^lns in tN Dty and proitcl its atsINtic qualititt. To accompliih tN IVst part d this purpoit* IN optrativt difinitlon d hardcovw should N? Any iftifieial tirfact that cautts rainwalir to run>oH that surlact Into IN laiVi or b^utaHit ol tN Lais* ratNr thAn to N ibsorNd Into tN soU and lUltrtd or to N rttaintd and tvaporaUd;. If you iccapt thia dalimtlon d hardcovtr* tNn ^»trt art cfHaln Undscaiarqi Itatirtswhich tfioidd not constt tuts hardcovtr: 0 ^actdf poreiA %nx)d dacKmgi which hst an absorhantf iporout natural lurlacc btntath it* I.#, no plastic itfitathing. 0 Landscaping rocKt with tithtr no plaatic Nnaath or with plastic that lormt a batin In which tN rain water it captured and evaporated. o Stairs and retaining walls on steep slopes < (heater than a 35 degree incline directly to the Lahe ) that do not increase tN amount d run-dl which would normally reach the Lake. : *t '#•M 5SC:4;':fe;1 I fc. V;' -ri- mX- :d i’;. 1 ;■ Vi also# considtration 1 hardcove r limi^ d a lot art wi- calculated Iroi tnordif 1 Counrll to cUr Nrdcovtr. -S 7V.: Sr Ut whole City d >ono havt wofhed h. tiN this eppe ellictivt and Thank you lor /’iV 6Tff^ thil nott 90M ol en it* in net. Wt ifi rr htt ctuttd t ttciring « thil vtf to thit It 4)0 art and thould ihtrtby »mpUih thf Oidd bf: tain /tr: mm Wt alto «ftl feat fit #iintfi •# a M iiioyld it trtw» W* contadfratitn fe itlf<«inini fet ut»m »i titffek tmart footcft hardKQvff U«H art ftiintf. f» tia*oit. H fet •fidgf hrm* tr itfUttf peintt el a Itl '•ifefe •»• lint* tli^lt ifeja^ loeUfi tfiauM it 9nm fet •lidfi fet* It fet IH **ol fet. fe 9fif It a^ iwftt tintidtftfeitfett* it mmM it iiiit Ife fet Ctuncfl It efeily fet P^tatf f*f»tfef fet •Irtfef tir of tiiffef Hr new tyt iiAiIiTifirttiftT **TP*** inttnl el fet lnrfeat»tr lefenafim Hr fet Off ti few fe tretftfei fet fe«Lity o# ferlatt tfid fer Off. At tttUfffe. m ba^ wort^d lutftl Hr itfe ti feott poalt* tH i*KtAt ham feat fet Coitidl *nUI taH ctterliftff H cfeiH fet erferwuti m tritr It sM fet« itfe tlHctirt and lair art can«it»?l In fetir mtlica^gi^ fitrt TOM Hr Ttur alttnUon fe felt rttuitf* f ... X '-■■■:-■ i '.; ' . ‘j Wm MMMMHt-t li.iMilrtt t- 1 t' ■■ V rt 1. FtEEMAN RVEYOR COUNTY,MINN. ■^Z]! . I »$??!»? l^i. $: X r-t- wm;■. .. -^ikL.. -:ii ■:■ ■' .:— wmt mm. m ^-. •:.->■m;l ...rc ! ^ V Of onoNO S03051SCityofOROIVOmiOiimoM o» Tut cirv couMCti wo. J > M_______ A Kisoumoa cuMtim k wkkiimM TO • *2 SEP l•le . w»m - MTiiiciria Momc e SeCTXOR 10.21, MOITttXOa 1(3 ABO fttCTZOM 10.IS. jSSWXVItlOS ( tOI ri Li(lf ^ »• itOEOtAS. John ( S«t«n PvrOy trr *lfi# •pplicanl*! AF« mmmtu of thm pre^tty leesteO at 197S Pifvrectt Toint Ooad vithin til# City or oreao (h#r#iiuirt#r #ad icfally tfeseriOoO •« foliMt Lot S. raf#rn#aa. i«nf»«pift Cevfity. Hipnaiot# lli#r#|naft®f ■property*) I *Bdl limtAJ. til# applicant Kaa applied I# the City for Tafiancii to Ronieipal tonino Code Sections 10.22. SoMiviaton 1 & 2 and 10.25. Sybdloiaion 0 fi) to p«rtilt the eonatrocticn of additions to the •xiatinf !»«•# and qarayo which will Incraas# hardcooor in tiM 75*250* lakcthor# aatback t^n« ae that the total aooant of hardcover on the lot voald txccad the aeourt of hardcover allowed by the Municipal Zoning Cod#; and which additions will incraaa# the asount of structure i.n the 0*75* ••tbacli tone wher# no structure is allowed; and which additiofis will #ficroach into the averaf# lakeahore setback tone wher# no encroacKwent is allowed; and which faraye addition will be located 0.5 feet free* the aide property line where a 10 foot setback is nomally required. ROif« TfiEiiBroRCc SB IT RBSOLVBO by th# City Council of oreno, ffinnoSQt# I PIMDIHCS I. This application was revir%#ed as Soninq file ISO. S. The property is located in the l.h*lC 51n^le fAoily I^akcshore Residential zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Cotsstission revlcwetl thin appllration on July 15, 1905, and recoassended approval of the proposed vnriancea based upon the following findings: A) The hardships to the property arc the slopes and con* figuration of the lot, *hr location of the existing struc tures, and thr fact that there is Iskcshor© on two sides of the property. Page 1 of f* leant*! within I bed at Lnafter rianett I 10.25, to the 75-250* on the ilcipa 1 ructure 1 which e where located >ack It ; OronO, kcahorc tlon on rlancea \6 con st ruc- Idct of ■4, * . (_- ? T > Of OnQHO .’ll-* pro,*ny •<*•”• «ioTltT rr«> th. "*»•« \,^Vf'iSJu'’’**»*******"'‘** «..... .............. ..t^..................... setback ioo« ©f hardcoetr, k ^ with fih*^ ® - ,n« «onc«rt.Bt r^ “ **’® a fill’ Mr.®.’*' ®‘ h.rdcM.r on V.fVor XJ.»* •'>® .r appUc.tlon of the propoM« van coMKunity page 2 of l.r — • i' ’uJi mi ,^r .;ni iW ■ friM divlt of tki hardc aaour al loi atruc avert which line folic U: covttf which f9T» • rent «»• concurrents ,ui¥0lent^ perty to tiw t in locetod iopoqrophy or tqe to • con- I Vi11 crooto .re-.jilttlBJ) j 75* ««tb«CR to topography B«tr tho on- tho adjacent t tho propoaod akoahorot ano fm aubatanti.al tore. itback In tho 75-250 >080d addition* aao in ovoraU th finoi 0-75 • hardcover or ncludinq amiaaion, hfuoffoct ir#of the s V. 4 mm ■ti".• -•■• «ki w ^m Cf1 1 o* 1 o«o*^n M ettyCkfORONO gtga.imowi 00 nn cirr cptfiKWL HO, i*u_______ A %aaw^ %aaw v-wev « « «v - property are pecellor to it end do ®*t uf^lf «jeaeraUy to other orooerty i» thia tonine dUtrleti that eraotlof tho eariojtco ^eid not advoraolf affect traffic coodltiooa. llfht. air «or a fire hatard or other daa^r to oelfhfeorloe proportyi woold oot oorely aereo aa a cooveoioaco to the applicant* hot la n^f^gaary to allooiat* a daoe watrohio hordahlp or diffiroltyi ia Mcoaaary to pretervo a aobofantlal property rlfht ol tl» a^ll- coatt and voold bo its keeplny with tho aplrit ohd latoat of tho ipolpf Code aad Ceepxalttaalvo Plan of tho City* coPCUMiopt, moat am coniTiflaii hated spea tho above flndlnot* tho Orooo City Cowell here^ oroats varioncoa to the aoalclpel toniny Codo ioctlona 10.22* ?ob- diolaimi I I 2 end 10.25* Sobdivitioo 0 111 to ^roit tho conatructloa of additioaa to tho eaiatino houao and forofo vhlch will incroaao hordeovoff la tho 75-250* lateahoro totbocii aono ao that tho total apovnt of hardcovor on thO' lot woo Id oacood tho aooont of hardcovor slloeod by tho aoniclpal toalnf Codoi and which additiona ell 1 la- eroaao the aooont of atrocture In tho 0-75* aotbact tone whoro no •t^CBCtur# it ttdl which tdditiCMii will metotch if^© avorooo laktahere aetlMCk tone where ao onoroachoeat ia allewodi a^ which porafo additi«i will bo located 0.5 feet froo the aide pr^rty liao whora a 10 foot aotboek la normally roqoifod, aohjoct to the ifollowiny cooditlonat I. varloacea ore fronted «o thtt the oeaiooo olloiioble hardcover OB thia property ahall bo JiS3 afuare feat total* baaed on tho additlma and rooovala of hardcovor oa doacrlbod bolewi a) Eaat aide of IwHjae - additloool hardcover - 10x24* additlwii not • ♦111 a.f. - oact with hot tub* eaat aidei net • 0117 a.f. --dtep alnoa exlatiaf wlki net • ♦H a.f. h aide of houao - additional hardcover .S’ additloni not • *575 a.f. c) Carafe addition - 12*x24.1* addition I net - ♦215 a.f. Total new hardcover addition before concurrent repovala • ♦1141 a.f. d) Concurrent repovala of axiatlnf hardcover - Rceieve patio block and any plaotlc or other hardcover frcai kennel area ■ -213 a.f. Page 3 of 6 Vs. rr ‘'V 1 tiri9 on thin Lly to othor h« varlonco |ht» «lr nor portyi would nt» but in fficultyi is [ th« sppli* Rttnt of ths incil ho ruby 10.22, ?ub- construction LI incrosss t tho total t hardcovor ns will in ns whoro no ch into tho llowod} and Ido proporty joct to tho lo hardcovor >ssod on tho mt rdcover froln * -‘w: W- ■>'i\ ''4 #as PP|imm 'w t 1■IonoNO^^ 1014 oo piattio fw0m oador roct fro* trawpolln* area • -ItO s.f. ___»oo plsatic I row tfyyti ofMicioo or^ui __r lO’all* Itect: Istaff to (wnfirs fOAditiooal • • ltd - irr^T^ Plattie ff«® cador » fti»d WI boost recsi m • lit S.f. Total c»cwrrrat rioooaI o5 tslttiRO fcardewoor ® -ifi s.l. tm.l IMT.... >- *'«•» .o****-* • liOl-IOS • 241 s.f* I4ic •!«> •«»“•*>•» * *“* - a tsftc . # i« «M th* 0-71* •otbach fOR© and Iff! s.f. i#of wbieh lets s.f. it ^ . j fcardcowor shall bo i-r vr.'t at any olwoo tioo nooor oscttdt Htl 9m—f foot. sr«vv.; V..... t«.. i.- »or- aally ro^ir^. % k oarianco is oraatoii for tho addditlofial 75* toBo for tho addition south of tho hoot©. this tloo way not bo approood. 5 Authoritios yrantod by this 5®" eiiVs*'nd‘*iSst‘^ n>t with tho applicant, but ouVin ono ytar of enorcisod by application for • H^lanco wi?: v»bl« on tho data of Council pl«^ on-notico that data (July to thot if ono or aoro of tho 1 apociiicy *! * A poriod, a not coaaoncod within ^ho ^ orantiny of tho ronowal varianco auat bo •PP.^/*^..„ not^ront any vottodvariances urdor tho curront oppUcatlon dw ^ riyhts to tho proporty ownor bound to orsnt tho aame future City Council Is not ’ variances In tho case of a renewal variance. S. violation of or "®"‘®®*Pffa VloVatlon*^©* the herein, and -hall be punishaole aa a alsdosioanor. race 4 of 4 •1 y f d* f MS ollne arcA to contiiM t rock tdginf v»r * *tfl Bti» Lon* *na rcBiovai* ind 25M i.r. it 'dcovcr *h*lX ko >n of th« •ntir« amount of hard* total hardcover tforminq garaq* ir of the qaraqe an the 10' nor- encroachment into ructure in the 0- r variance* *te B request* for that granted at th the preoerty »ly and must be thin one year of will evpire on laced on notice red project* are roval period» • granting of the grant any vested ion d*te» *nd * grant th* same the term* and iolation of the athority granted 0- 3 '%l ';h M vH ’ « V i ••-‘.>r.-:--.. ! ■-.■'.A.;- •;■ .m. .v>^ , : ... dty of ORONO iwnoumM oi iiiicff¥ cMcnL, » i«l__ 1 ''^0-:->NOL M If t5i ”4*ii^i«» »« ^ •* iw^r- % :J^by the iQioee City Council o* thl* 22th dey of ioi»y Pan^ S of C» en H* •j-':. \^■<ljfct .,ffmiMflBitr: ^ *^-i|Wi!i>»«.waw>»- >. -iliil*!',' •■’Sfefciwsa* ,^...* . ■■WN!^' » • h«f«bjr iBMlff cordifif f Juiyf .■i'S mM, - :;•;*■ ry: '-V* ti':-/ l••^■ Wm^ H' ,r r.7; : -j % f'./:y ■ '=?<H6 #:jmm(|iiiWIWiilllli«liiiiiii'*rr-ti • h-- -'/: j /‘?<e>r 1^1 </M-IIU.-CI--' «-<*• * -i'O*' •*' •'* • Ml. _____ _ ^ •iAfff'• ,*, .................................:i::;;,Ti«re.»c«m«- ►» .......................................................... ••» •«»•••”’' * ® wt t,^ai .........................;: , ..............................................•* -" ■ ” - - • ■ •«.«•. ..........................................................................................• • • • ITT > I ^........• Vll’ V VeViVtVff*i t.Klieo Mf***" • ’'■ _ . .. . 1 . «»• •' V _____« Ame%rn *•* * ' , * *i**#ir ’Aecti r^-» iN-cii ®>i»- ■ ,.«-.• ’•'■ l^t «!»••« “ , Total T,*99 ^ E.V.. W ta.aee«r «*2»«' nMit«<^ f .* • A ^na l^f o»W»<> bow*** —nock •frort PtepjsmI «•»» ^ 1 i fe*cl»diftq jolin»«»_____ • .•5«r # * I 1^-250* C, »topP.«l . ___»«4-k ami walk \ Cl rroppw ---------------- . ^ j4» »f - ^l\}\ |;: Sinu. ^.iMlnq -’>» -[ff r, ' "" ,'^aA ’I’ Total Hat PtcrC'O MOi'-o”' L ]{^tf[ ^ / i Z '?(a(^3 .✓ B; ftr* ' viPbJ»re I <3<p«'3 Jf* I fi th^ ««*tunl »y stuff « mm H L ]-i2.\i i-^- j-l^oo ^ 60^* ZZ*? i’^ .*-u * >,< )<?9ft 5k.^«''' a r # . <3<»''3 v/ ;,,f: —‘^‘t— •■ ■*U h Sm ■fy fiasl ,,4«.J« -l«V*^ •'""*** ^• I zrzz “::r..» ; ;r.:; ''. «% « I tall ••••••• •* / f»»C«Ht^ • \ll^l....................• • • • • t-n* • •-»:»• •”••/" ' ^1 «-T#*r rfof«»*^ _________ '«**p*r*'^•“**'"* ^ *** * ------*************V.ltMlt •• * M ni.t»m m.nl«r*«* W*-*'* "'•* SIit<l i» • • T«.. .„ .lu.ni *• I...—...... ... ........................................................-................................... • •-••••“■'****** . nrAtriH^;r*uu'.;M 2U •* (tr-fw i.itl .f O^fc JPO •! U3„,n ‘ «»•«> J« Stairs CaraQS mmmm m m • • i 2 fiO al ^.. . „■. ,„r„|......... I;-;;; n-Minina H^TflcOver - 27^ •* rropo«*J »« Miittowl M.t ^ rrop9» ,4.,4ieoYft .1--— —- Prof»osed Total FJiat-Oraioinq 14,040 1 • 1 ■-* *• |«t^r fla np»w Ad*Ht U rkMl Rfthod • kfotnl teoiitwlariea • Total r»ia«li total rro|X>»« Total ®*tear .»■.V»] »'-^ ?• •• Jl. bn •« « 29f • et.4 t( » r • c* - —" ...—..............• „ tfmuiL •• • _______ ___ 950 s£ - J'2iT6i] m j • 277 Sf ^ - 2,950^*_2 ’3 14,040 s.. vA In ■- .■ fi .■| ^.- ^I r i>a '4i|fefe: -U.■ ::;^':-5jt.,: • ■.V--•-;.^=.41 It. . Iti • •• ** • !•• •£ ♦ • • •••> •' •44 «f r sr; - -• 21,^ HifelH »•**• ” •::!!!.................................................. ................................................................ ...............................Il^LicsIW al*<^“;nr..!»• »•»•'' •' tw»» »■>*’■■!* • »'-*’’A»i m' "«••* '•' • ■■is:’. "THTr.::*-- ••'“ .••••••••* .. I ^ • uMlN ,• ■.^-■.¥: mm !’¥■ Ski. C..-:-. ■■■:■., ■■■■■ ■.:x- ••■.s ■ -,j- •••. Fl««M hardcc hardc* incr^i List Of Bxl Exhlbi Exhibi Bxhlbi Exhibi Exhibi Bxhib: Bxhib: Exhib: Bovioii of i The i attached i second sto H). The ( within th hardcover approximai drainage f yard befoi there is i area. In applicant hardcover around is p\blic roe cover at p mmum PlmtmiM Coamimmion QmUmmn ir«U#y Of^iio fl*imln9 CoMiltti^ City n4»lnl«tr«tor MriUiArdsoa k. NAlwstti, ftuildiA9 i kOminirnttmtot jUffuat 10« I9fi Siibteti 11313 «llii«i J. Latiar, . vmrimacm - rublie HtatlA^ lOBiBQ! Distxiict • l(ll*10 total htmm * 02,301 a.f. or 1.43 actaa ^ »actiMat OraieMC - S.ctloo 10.a?, SubOl.i.lon a - BoiOcowo* »*ri«nc« r.q«lr.O vlthin th« T)-aS0' Mtback .r... total Ataa * 30,333 a.C. Allowod Bardcovor • 0,033 a.f. or 331 Kxiatine Hardcovor • t,74i a.f* or 3f.3i rr^oaad Bardcovar • 0,230 a.f. or 31% * ^ hardcoaar at 0,003 a.f. or 30.11) Hardcovar ificraaaa • 302 a.f. or 1.03% Vlaaaa iiota tliat ataff haa not racaivad a coaislata auraay ineraaaa of 245 a.f. ovar ataff*a calcolatiofia. Llat of Sxhiblta Ejdlibit A - Exhibit 0 - Exhibit C - Exhibit 0 - Exhibit E - Exhibit f “ Exhibit C - Exhibit H - A(pllcatlofi troyarty Ch#nara Llat Plat Ka|> Hardcover Pact Shaat Staff Sketch of Hardcovar at Tl Application Raviaw Survey Floor Plana Elavationa of iltildino Paroit ;-;y **’*~h“* .n .tt.ch.d two .t.ll gar.9., an .apand.d * aacond atory bedroo. .atanalon ov.r the now i In *hirdc^ B). The proFOB.d i«trov.monta r.ault In a 1.8t Incr.aa. _ within th. 75-250' aatback area. ,,^1/ i hardcover within the 0-75' aetback area ‘^*'“*. ^*'* ^°“!*,** i®'!,' approkimately 175' fro. the lakeshore. The '**,a drainaoe fro. the iaprovementa on the aite run over the eapanaivn qraaaea P“d before it r.achea the lake. In addition, the •PP “®?25on?*^r!tbic^ there is no excessive amounts of *'**^‘*°°''*'^, *** JL ? - . action, applicants have been held to no increaae in hard -.ver where exce.sM^ hardcover exist with proposed new i.provements In =••** ".‘"o , around is required so that a resident did not i < /e to , . , . „ I lblie roadway. Council has re-considered the policy of maintaining nara cover at present levels.. '4 \f - n Boning August Page 2 1 f the that tf hardco^ that c< Plannii a.f. of 15-230' Tl additi the nc propos expans Staff T for a Drive, 1. fh 2. Th • 1 3. Th Optioi Appron A. X i B I t t C.1 I I « 1 I Lnl*trator I Drive 2 - Haracover variance (Staff approxlnated )05 a.f. or 30.1%) lete aurvey thowlng all latlng hardcover finding it'a inventory ahowa an 18. 6 of Building Perwit ting of a grade level oom to the rear, and a on (review Exhibita G fc increase in hardcover otes that there i. no the house is located jority of the surface >.* the expansivt grassed .*1 applicant notes that n the 250-500' setback 1 and Council action, '^ver where excesses of In cases where a turn- ;ve to back out onto a cy of maintaining hard- 4 1 '■M t. * ¥ %h. ■i:- #. ■* „i* Sailing Pile §1112 august 10# !§•• Pagei 2 of 2 v',ir.'irrV.rV :ry;<iu.vrn ruwl^5 O0^»“ -y con.td.V . tr.dV-«.fJ. ..Klftfl for th. tM .ccoa.ory #tr»ctor.» within th* 150-500'..thneh ar.a (afpioalnataly I a.f. of hatdeower) to offaot 50J a.f. of additional hntdcowar within tha 7S-3S0* setback area. n«jS«“wlth th* Mjorlt, of drama,* conttnoln, to flow OY*r th* KX|pjinsiv9 <9^%9s#4I y®rd toward® l®li®e tuff To accrov* th* h*rdcow*r varianc* a,,U«*tlon (•) of Wllim J. * for a ,rJ^(oa*d addition to th* *«latln, r*nld*nc* at 51*5 north Shora Driv*. haa*d on th* followln, flndln,ai 1. Thar* 1* no h#rdcov*r within th* 0-75' a.tback am*. Th* aalatin, hooa* 1* loeatad 175* fron th* d*fln*d lakaahora at »29.« elevation. 3. There are no exc In hardcover within the 250-500' setback area. Options available to the Pianning CMaaiosioii Begarding Conditlohs of A^xovai - Maintain hardcover within the 75-250' require the renova 1 of 1.8% of hardcover within the 75-250 eatbacx area . B.Allow hardcovar to b* Incma.ad to 31* -Ithln but require the renoval of 1.8% of hardcovar portions of that hardcover nay be located within the 250-500* setback area. C.To actrove the application as proposed providing an increase of Lrd^Svar of 1.8* within th. 75-250' sdditionsl removal of hardcover within either the 75-250 tetback area or the 250-500* setback area. The applicant should be advised that ® whether •ptr„r„r d^aVp^cp ^hardcover in the 75-250* setback area, a hardcover variance must ^ addressed. mm VARI ;reas« ifi axcesaiva and hara ara no excataaa In ra ara additional araaa Ishipa to tha applicant. 9 for tha removal of tha iraa (approximataly 417 il hardcovar within tha tha alevationa of tha are proposad outaida of hangaa J . drainaga ara ling to flow over the (•) of william J. Lauair ce at 3165 North Shora araa. Bfined laKeahore at 929.4 250-500' setback area, gegarding Conditlona of back area at 29.2% and hin the 75-250' setback the 75-250* setback area over portions of that ietback area. •r; oviding an increase of ick area and require no the 75-250' setback area ;over variance must be iw hardcover. Whether BS of an increase in 30ver variance must be ■ T-. I f , ,r i cxfy dr oBoiid - wmfXB CAT Initial Application Fa# Sl'50.00 I•50.00 per each additimial variance) ganeval Variance fee 175.00 (no change from original application) After-the-fact fees (Ooobla application fee) fiofiBiTy xjocmcn Site Address k ^ i ( > I •V • me e«e • % » >i 7' me V e WJ^ x% • • • 4 • V • m t.-: • im» *4«a •VtfS Hi re*iii 1»-Property Identification Vu^af (f.l.D.) flaasa check one - froparty . abstract or /ll i . torrena? Attach legal dascriptloo to applicati^ if hot included on required survey. AppLXCjyrf Name Phone (home)#'li SMi \luitvi ) >. .a»g«C. Addressi f r-1., t Cityi fhwe («fork) (r qnr aini ^<1 (if different than applicant)Phona (home) Ph^e (work) i * ^Addressi Cityr Sipi Date Pro^rty Acquired (sonth/year) I (do) (do not) also own thm adjacent parcels of land. tuisiinr osg (9 j^oFSETf Describe request in details Jbi VAM1MMCE8 RBQOIgSD Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front X H...H.'ird cover Side Rear) •:s. .-.W ♦ -Vi V^v /■ ■‘X ESt” mm .A eAK>SRl De en f K DBSCglP De Co gB(p)lM 1. Co ^2 3. 4. C 6. 8 Ca th 34 St ni ofc Ce Tc if P] Ai ar A<! fhe Ap rememb informi CertifJ Zoning APPLia The a{; reques unusuai the in knowle< Applic OWNERS The ow author; agents tion ai Owner' Applic Plannl third review unable author Office % ''V,. 3 . 4 ^ '.•;^S . •«. .*.' > w ^ >i ;7 ‘lfr- ^>4« W ^ 1 4» -Vi OW 4 II A • • * # * « S' >rren«7 lud«d on «w * I 'i I SLU (work) ~ I \C Zioi *') V/ / (work). r Zips (month/year) of land. \Residential ify) rtion Cost $ /C C C r- ^ i'~.,,i • f\A 'V*' > *'^,/r:\ lJ. lardcover Rear) ■‘h ■« m'’ ?r ki . Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting froA strict enforceeient of soning reeulati<msi . . > ^ ^ ♦DESCRiPtiCK or fmosoMU iPROpgynr cxaniTi Describe unusual property coodilions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Reowiresmntss M I. a. 4 • I I BSD sDna TrhLs Completed Application Pons Certified Property Owners List of owners within ISO* lyoo eust obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of finance A-OOl Oovt Center 340-3271). ^ w - .w Stamped* legal sited envelopes (IIO) pre-addrsssed to each of the names on the above liet with no return sddrett iose address labsls obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations at required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed slsvatioht) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. j Plat Kap (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, plsase attach a sepafatt list of any other pert<ma you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be reguested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Plaasa remember that your variance application is not eomplets If the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is conplsta Zoning Official's Signature,Date AFPLICA»T*8 SXOiATfmB ^ ^ ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this a^lication, and certifies fbst the inforMtlon supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge Applicant's Signature ^/( *Date 7 (fj/S-i' f OmfBRS 81GHAT0EB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Cocroission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. A 'Owner's Signature / / . / ^ ________ Date/ X* a # —O / * A'/ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Ccxnmission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants roust be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & 2on ng Office of this change prior to the meeting. (you inUit obtain m A-603 Govt Canter sad to each of the use addraaa labels ions as required* ons) if any changai a separate ation. plication. Please plete if the above ation is complete. nation required or ly all fees and/or , and certifies that le best of his/her Ication and further staff# consultants, rposes of investiga- 5 25 days before the ngs are held on the \t at all scheduled If an applicant is ngements to have an Building & Zoning g Ihi ;i=S; I 4 •^1 I Sr^iSSasissa m IM ^ H mti a ihl flt I rO 1 'i sr a e a !|S9*£P fiae ee O il =*!!!» =*ia|5£ ^ p • 1 aSlisa •A ISS St III s S • U W •■il 5sss 111! u • I- s 1:111 Si*1 •«i || =E.*g iS.*Esi ••• s«:-sa Sill'I'm MZmmlt 8 ^8i Es “II -I j; IM ^8S =5|:|! ^ lot$ gs». s # ^as.Isa §l9l I X s «» I •I I ft Qim 4 >- 's S 1 Irir^ III «a 5 1 1 i £ V I, c ;j(rv rm^f ••A. ^ iTiSr 1- *— tsi«tl»f g*f«eow*f rtfeaetatM) «ft/AtmlOO o*ts»ii22S-»» 11:1 ftf ^Uf t % t -J2__ 4^igc af •f *.1 .* M «___IL. w i 9 mi Jiid-1 ___N %if %___Jl- jicT®'. v^uie r> trr ^yascovn umititiw®njymoiviB tvctsstii - Wtrmctiax^ wiWi coef* w mk^ui« a**® OrlvaHOiya If*®**' ^ fy«ir«ll: ^.....71..«— ««»»•»» -? pXMtio abaatlaf 4m* Mt •il®® 4ii#«t Any *tli«r *®ffa«® t®*t 4®** ■**” __________ vAlataii Into UMI fWHMi ‘La-IA* Ul-’»-l*. Ul-l*** •M-ie* “• sac. 10^2. aacoiAtioat **** *fi4* 'muiIb m nM~in’. t«-l*-2*» *i»-»c*, o» ruiiLT uu«»«o«« ■wipwm*** I. p4,t,ict ttw touw»i»« **«oi»tioM •*•»» Bwiy •UI-lC-l* 0*® t*k**hor* »**14o«tl < - «H« MtL back fro* tho *lior*lino for •«M. 1. t»k«»l!or« Mt buUaina MT »*«•»«• el«^* »* *** l.l,,.hor. lot. .h.Xl b* « th. .hor.lln. of .«Utl»« t..l<>Me. ohorollBo th.n th. ovotofo «■*•"'• ” bulldtm. oo odjoewit oad ooorby »ot.. - o-1.2^01 vithin 75 foot of •horolino tboro Subdo 2. Lok..hor* H*r4 t*.Wory or p*r«.nont *tructur*i. •hall b* no oacavating. ,|lil ^ no groator than 25% bar4 covor. nlthin 75 to 250 taot of «'* “• I? Within 250 to 'VI SSo ^Mrof thl •horolino th.ro .hall b. no groator than 35% cooor. mthlB 500 to 1#000 foot OZ T,om m hard cov.r. 1 ..tnn. MO troo* within 75 foot of th. •horolln. Subd. 3. Tro. M.OOV.I ' -hall b. rMO.od without first obtaining with the dlwMit.r of *lx (6» inch.* or -or. .hall b. rMO.M a parolt fro- th* Council. imm 1 lowed ardcovaf •rcentaga 0 i 2i 1 30 1 «- - - - % Lit t »llo« die*ct grOQOd •Uf>ic*i* on !•, •Ll-lC*, or • shall applyt ahorallna for olotar to tlio Lng rtsldtnca Korolina thoro It atructurat* 25% hard covar. than 30% hard raatar than 35% - of tha abort lino >ut first obtaining »mxorm I • » cam ia« et a if tad aa «rdiaa»r« Sitlttag rtleva aarfarat f*ha#daa»af*lmm cmm imi ©Bn^wnwl iiiiSi jnuar ^» SKh at ra^t* drltipaya, al4hmlia« ata. aa paafartlaa laeattd vithia 1.000 fast ef a lakt. Otadtaa Haas ahoan that aadlawata. alia, •addabtlt aartlad lata tha laka fraa highlir wbaaliad atM» haaa a datrlaaatal laifi Pt aa tha gwllty aatar It Iba lata. Tha iataat af Oraaa*a ardlaaaca la ta aaaara that rainfall raa-aff at II Id clattaaii hy flltartag thranh »r»i»#4 ar vagatatad yaii araat hafart aatarlaf tha lata. tono • nmammLmammrsmr* I* o>7S*i in tha araa aitlUa Ti* af tha lalaa^fo* PO-liardgoTijg ,lt,j;||'v-» i- 10%}. tX« Tf-I50i*i tn tha ipartlest af tha lot laeatai iMitaaaii 13* had ISOt* fra* tha Xaha« >5% ^ that partiaa ^ tha iat imt ha hardoaaaradU 331. 3fl>-i00^i la tha partladi af tha lat lacata^i hataaaft HO? (and 500* faah frai tha laha 301 af that portiaa ef tha lat Bay ha hardaaaawd. IT. n0*l«000^i la tha portiaa af tha 1^ lac*tad hataata §00* (si^ 1*000* faah ifro« tha laha JJJ| af that pattiaa of tha lat aay ha faMOaaaarad* lOTti Thaia m«l«tietta apply aaan If yaa h»a# a lati that Oaaa aot ahnt tha lain hah I# althU a laha^iara taalag district. nmwTWi ligf hardeaaar pareantsTa oalealatlhM) X. 9-n^iam Mm ITo ha laad at daiianlnatMr la all hraa a fs* a /hraraga aldth of lat In 0-T5* mdV V naaaara parallal to aliafaliaa / 71 ’ m M'____________ft. a a.f. Ill (hag width} ihrM of 0-7§* hfiS^^llTvS*arg lot depth in tcmal h/hag ififth af lot in 7S-3S0* io«»\ V Mssara parallal to ahoraliiM / 17S* M ^^3 a.f. 13) (hag width) hraa of 75-250* tOM III. 250-^500* lore fkrmm • (250* or aag lot tepth in toaa) n/hag width of lot in 250-500 lonni \ nanaora rrrallsl to alwralina / Hr?’ 8 ^5S ft. • ______,«.f. (3) (hag width) hraa of 250-500* ton# tf. 500-1.000* tona Araa •■ ( 500* or avg lot depth in aonn) a/hag width of lot In 500-1000* ton«\ \ ■aasora parallel to shoreline / 500* X ft. •s.f. (4) (hvg width)Area of 500-1,000* aooei am {planning Orono hi City h<hi Hichan1 huguat giOs^jaeti §1313 i VarlancN il^llcatlGB - Har< SOBihd Diatriot - ILiat Qf Knhibtts Exhibit A - Exhibit B “ Exhibit C • Exhibit D - Exhibit I - Exhibit f - Exhibit Q • Exhibit H • Exhibit I - {Partiimt faetd - 1, App1 leant \ raaova what patio para] grade-lava! wide walliwa^ leads to a axiating gai Tha architai and axiatir aurvay pro^ datarninad than tha calculating Existing 0- the 75-250* this proper contains a which is in Based on at in tha 0-75 29.6% 31 Based on th the fact th exchanged f at as a poi i. ••^*^. .. - •••' ••. * .■. ■ ■•">•.,•• ■ ■ .will II iwtm ..■%,.-;-$iF • • .:.^- iMWaPf ted mm ordioanc* Italttsf ona aorfacaa C*tiatdc©aaf*) ;atad within 1,000 faat of ria carried iate the like M quality of water la the raiafall rea-off will be real before eatariaf the Mo Bardcoyar la aliened :weea 7S* aad 2S0* f rra the Id. between 3$0* ahd 500* feet irdcovared. letween 500* aa# liOOO* feet irdenwefed. a not abut the lake iet la need aa denoninatoi' in all f lot in 75-250' sime rallel to ahoreline ) of lot in 250-500* ionej :;rallel to ahoreline f :.ot in 5OO-1000* aone railel to ahoreline ) !C ^ 'I 5L'- ^ ./'.'I# ■p L "^3 ■ V-; ' :HMMi l«K>. fo*i flAMihO OoaBUaaiom Chalrfian Mllef _____a _____i-w--------------e ^ ^ a mrAmMM9A9^^ aa an ■i"" ■ — *—* jOfone jblejifiiftq CnmiailoA uWiBlwr* City hdalftlat rotor »ar«li«rd»oii Frost Mitdieel Caffront# Jk»Mt riaohlim i hdolftlatrator ttot hftqoat ll# ItOO Mtwti mil «ieh«rt en.r. 2*ii WMMiywood " varlencai - roblio BearIh9 ABolteation - Birdowir and atmetore t«i 0-75 * iotbdck iSnisf OiMtfict • 1^1B« l-acre, »#o#red t-twt of Biblliitai Kxlilblt A - Exhibit ft - Exhibit C • Exhibit D - Exhibit C - Exhibit r - Exhibit G - Exhibit n - Exhibit 1 - Afrlleeti«i Elat hep Erofierty <h*»erf 1,1 at •onrey Eroeoatod Deck. EI xas Saieoy with Staff Wotatlona Elan View With Staff WotatiohW Staff nmt^eovmt faviaw hj^|lieant*a Eardcoewf Eaelair 5r.d.-l.vl d.ck CT th. oxiating garage area 2..rehitect’a cobcautual aketch of the progoaod acraan •urv.y frovld-a. ,.ccur.t. d.terain.d that th. * ^* hlt.cf* *^.tatch waa ua.<l <®'than the ayr«/ay, hanca tha arcnitact e enwi. calculating tha hardcover changea. BKl.tinq 0-75* hardcorar 1. 2.S91 a.*, or about »»•»»• tJe 7V-»o“ IL, 1. about 1.5M t T o Vf^’o* hardwv.n li roita\;r.n’;.t7ro*^,m r?" appro;i.ataly 2/3rd. of Which ia in tha 0-75* setback tone. Ba.ad on at.ff. calculation., th.r. 1. * in the 0-75' ion. of .pFroilaatoly 128 ».f.. increa.ing tn. 29.6t •-.> 31.Ot. s:'s.s sK.-sjT.s'-.rptvvS.fexchenged for hardcover further back, thi PP ,%oe» not anbaar to be at as a positive change for the property. There does not appear ro ow .IJIW—P .■traiof Btback zonf« levol dcckf ftndl xiitlnq concr«t® • to construct a construct s 4' ths houssr which itf behind the xeen porch» deck Lon shown on the spection, it was ly more accurate was used for Hardcover in rail lot basiSf hardcover. Xt itely 2/3rds of rease of hardcover ling the 0-75* from coupled with irer the lake in could be looked lot appear to be Uwiing rile iuii Aogest; II• 1911 rage 2 of 3 llleoessieo 40V*t-H - ,A excessive unftecessaT? heracover eo ti»i propeftri fee^ Hi s.f • lecfease eey oot be sifslf loeet. 0» tbe other It woe to •••V feasible to redece the site of the syfficiently« andl reo ove evefi eore of the existiof coecrete patiOf so that there is no net iocreese in hardcover. free •» aesthetic standpoint* the proposed rcw® It# sod grade»lovel pletfore deck in place of the existing second story deck will likely epieef less obtrusive In the leodecape, a^ the bulk of the hovae structure oay appear aore diitant frno the lexe. Given the conflict between the architect's sketch slid the Council acti^# tho existing patio a.^ deck area he verified. Staff SeooHBendaticii the 0-75* setheck tone. ■?; •LL'^ S'.J N' % !l K ■**_-''* . ?• i • • i:- - • -|w L-::. ■ 4 . CITT OfiCHO Initial h|>f>li (150.00 per Kenewal Varia (no change kfter-the-Fec raorsirry loci Site hddress^ Property Idci fieaae check kitsch legal required aur 1 htPLiCkirr Haas __ kddreas (if dl Hana ^ kddreai Date Fi X (do) fmanr oss Preseni Presen' DBSCSimOR Deacri VAR1A8CBS S Setbac other ►"<W:I%J« :;. VVW ■■ir-■^.v.•• -I'. - •...«Htt* -■ ■-. ‘.vif.it-vll :e th« r#qu««t«4 ir hand it would lad lowar dock ncrato patio# SO rchr dock abovo existing aacond ndacapa# and tha oo tha lake. and tha aorway >f tha axiatlng ig ataff haa not appropriata aa a that prior to any arifiad. ir to ba tha fart m tha lagoon, and fi. virtually any uira variancaa* ructural aatback of tha axiating atfom dack aixa in hardcover in - rti I ^ ‘ ; ■ F.. PI r ^ t '.•>■ ii • cm m own - WWW* fUT'^'r'" f J altar-tha-fact faaa COoabia epplt^tt^ ^ '• 13 ‘<JSt • fOtlglT U«TI0B iita addrasa Mi #f «|k :5t\M . r/« 4c.# :i4 fr-ofrtrty i-faotificatioii Wui^ar If .X.O* > ,^li Tii. ,!«,• c-«ci. «- - Wop.»t# J^.b.tr.ct « ------ torr.o.» AlUch I«9«» to .|>t>lleottoo I* not loclodod on ra^irad auraay. umicMi pfiona <Ar»\ Addraaii ig^n*(il diffarant than appUc^ntl fhona (hoaa) Haiia Addraaai phofia (work) Data Property I tad I (doi (do noti .uo nOIT OSS 09 fStiflKTT Prasant toning Diatrlct Praaant Oao of Property 4/e- (s other (apacify*. ^ISCSlFTiOH €9 MQOSST Daacriha request in detail Batiaatad Construction Coat ^.P^tgjTPt- VJ^ASC^ rbqoibsd Lot Area Setback variances ( Other __ Lot Width Front L4_ laonth/yaar) Hardcover Side Rear) wa(iiHHPiw*a WUB^mp Daacriba ynd< anforceafcant < DSKattPTlOli 09 Oli Daacriba unui Coda Requira (ISIO SOWITTA I, a. J 4. 9« «. 7. I. Coaplatad Ap Cartifiad Pr this iiat fr 14t-3271). itaapad, la naaaa on th< obtained wit Certificate • Topographic in existing Plat Hap (oh As an addend any other pr Additional i Tha Applicant a ranaabar that y< information haa r Certification by Zoning Official*! APPLICAMT'S 81GMJ The applicant I raquestad by th unusual axpansas tha information knowledge. Applicant's Signi OMItBRa 81GHAT0BB Tha owner harabj authorises raasoi agents, Coiranissii tion ond varifi|^ Owner's Slgnaturd Applicant must h Planning Commias third Monday of review meetings < unable to attend authorized agent Office of this c r---3 t :::, y ."••J r^^ta arnx A »/* «<•» ✓VWW _____________ ii cm ;?/ri-i 0®-t% rrcns? Ludtd on \ qrw •^v\C work) ^PD6*\_ gjpi \ work) ZiP< (nonth/year) of land. Resldantial :ifyi :tion Coat $ M2>- Hardcover Rear) ■■ ■ ■ rmitinaijt'. v : ■ i __ W^- WKKOBMIW DeacflPe ttfidii# hardaklp or practical dlfficitliy rami lino fro« strict enforeoHmt of sooin^ radiationsi PlSOUPflCM QW tmosoia* PSOPMITT aMDlTlOSS Oascriba unusaal property coodltiona pravaotia^ coapl lanca Coda Raqiil>^bo«its • •iff '■ p|H 5irE'3?^“4.™:; S3 23;; 3* Staapodf lofal •i*»^ anvalopas If10) pra-addrassad to each 2?? naaas on tha abova list with no ratorn address (osa addrasi labais c^>taifiad with property owners list). 4. Cartificata of sorvay Inclodina hardcover calcnlatloos as rod**^*^* Topographic survey laaistlng and propoaad elevations) If any ^landft la aaisting grade are propoeed. «. flat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. Mm an add^idias to this application, please attach a separata list of any other pers<ma you wish notified of this application. 0. Additional ItesM as aay be requested by City staff. ________ The Applicant and Property Owner oust sign this application. reaeaber that your variance application Is not coaplete If the above information has not been incltkled. Department Zoning Official's Slgnatarsi^Deto IIFP1.ICAMT* 8 SIGMATUUI . . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information requtred 01 requested by the Zoning Adainistrstor. agrees to pay all unusual axpenaaa Incurred in review of this application, and certifiaa that the information supplied is true end correct to tha best of his/ha )cn<ailedge. Applicant*a Signar D.t* if^K OmORS SIiaiATURB ) The owner hereby ac)cowledg4s and agrees to this application and furtnar authorisas reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, agents, CcmcnissixwriMtwbers, and Council members fcr purposes of Investigs- tion and verification of this remAt. Owner's Signature , n-^ ^_____Date ------ Applicant must have all sidsoittala into the City of ices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commissi or) :*aetinga are held on tne third Monday of each month. Applicants must bo present at all scneduiea review meetings of the Planning Cwnraission and Cou i *?. 1. If aD applicant s unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please injike arrangeuents to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to adv_Gt “the Building & Zon r.g Office of this change prior to the meeting. - i' U-'. ••■•^. V !fc-v.-v;; 4 1!' ii 'll i > -'^ ''tt n '8 ■ " ■ “‘■=V7:|dIV ■ t.1 • ' • '.... ok \ y i V t\.' yiy . ' • '- ■•'==■ ^- f'' i #^1 ii ‘. -■■• : -1 V ■ •■;j ‘.:c4»T',;r:'- mm . . ■t 5 ¥- 'jm:. -«»i..: ■i'.»ia»»?» (IWi UAjtX>c^e^ |i*v»cw C f ** 7r-2^CO* Ze.j<» -.Atvftr* ' 2->,“*t5 »»/rr7»*Cii -1 > %Jr t. S" > C» v 5 rt yyiitJCt sf icr iro r?¥ *ioo /xp7 Qsci *^! S. (a y* ’pr-Jso' e^xi ’^C* r 'tpxfc'w f r . ZJfx Z*?, ^3 0 » ^* 7^ 21.^ L co ’jc ^r 0-*>r l^/aT?«4. ^ /r^*? ?r*?5tr> ^ 3 V :4^::..- ■m W::m % *',/V ■m 3f^ - • *'■ f i 1 ■. ^• ■ • • . • •»«>•:''■-■ wsi^.■>..jfliWMi\ 2-"?a sf. ‘icso S^O'7 P'J^O ^tr^Cs» 6or dOf P/2ofiA^.tS^ Hi n v:>- Ur. Mm l^vv:.■ t? 1^- r • I r £ « i •■ * 'V'^.0 n? 11/ £13#.1.3 t^%#» » e S I ♦ ss j: Ch C m •m,i Ob ••• •••• ••• ••••%•>%•%•%•%•%!•%ii «•%•%•••#•••••• • •••••••••m ••m • •m •m 1 r V f • K. f‘•^' • j # % ii V v'4 . 11 • ••i 9 •rt 9 9 • • i ••f 19 m M M K w t K M M n m m M ' • >%\M t 5 O w4^ o> <6 m 10 01 C I - •41 & t ^1 «%i| I« m G O M P m O' Nd Il4 §f o ii «D u» V. Q 4C 4# Oz& O 41 5 5 Sag 3 S §^- 14 Xli 4J O • « r i nm «# II M U •i JD O •5JL m m «M i s t •4«4 «■» m mm * I « ..V--^ <-^:!« ..-. :r •• hm- i§ iSlmm i4 ^.',;.-=''m r-'V -:V.Vi| mwsi lii! 2*‘fa 90i 9lmtmit»q Coeaission Chaiimaji 0roiH> Flttiiaifif CoBKiaeioB mtrntmtm City Maiiii«tr*tor B«nkK«rdft<ifi ilicliaci f. (Uffron* JU«t Flanainf ft Jldidiiliirfttor AygQst tf 19ft Ikiiifftcts 11314 G«rald ft Candace ftovlatta* 337S layalito toad ** Vairiffica - tyblic aaafief applieatioa • Straat aatback variance to coaatryct 4.S* a 13* aynrooai addition. Ioni 09 Diatrict • Llt*lA« l^ftcva# fma^rarad Liat of fahtbita Exhibit k - AfplidatloA Exhibit t - Plat Map Exhibit C * Property OwiMra Liat: Exhibit O ~ Survey With Staff Notaiiona Exhibit E - Plana ft Elevationa Showing Propoaad Loeatii^ of Eonr Exhibit P Oociaantatim Prooi 197f Variance Approval Pertiiient Pacta - 1.Straat Setbacks Pequired ■* SO* Exiatint • 21*fat additi'^n l >catiofi) At Addition SiteI Propoacd - 19* Variance ■ 31* Of 2.The propoaad aunroom *filla in* an exiatinf indentati wall of the house. in the north 3.Hardcover: Total Exiatinq Hardcover • 4.005 a.f. Total Hardcover Allowed on Property * 4.850 a«f. (251 of 75-250* tone) Propoaed Changes: CSiange Proposed - SunroM rock and plastic. 4.Note that the 1976 variance approval to add garage, rooms, and deck partially in the 0-75* xona was conditioned upon removal of 20*x20* concrete patio. That patio has never been removed. CifcyliiOB , ■ .i'-, i-tti-iVfX■ ■ ■ V vv ' V . . . . . . . . . . . . .■*. Eoning Pild fill Ayguat §• 1900 Page 2 of 2 The weaterl In 1974. the Pc conatruetion of original houae « aetbeck regulres allow the room, required to rea ahoreline. Thia •ecauie thi about 2* out fro appaar to axtan^ aean froa tha •ignlficant impa or opan apaca ii tha axiating hou no uaabla buildi Staff aar>.nini1i Baaed on tt of the propoae< concrete patio prior to lasuanc Adainlatgateg Bayfiat Bora mi iitruct 4.5 ’ 1 12* iullfoor osed Location of Sungooii I Approval 9 indentation in the north 4,850 a.f. - Sunroom is over existing garage, rooms, and deck apon removal of 20*x20* oved. iA-'i i iT ' -'i: F*-' i .-.fe?I ...Mh . >Vii^ifii iiTitmiiiriliiwiilw iUmliig file it Hi Aogust i« Itii fage 2 of 2 DlecsssiiMi * The f^aterly pertleii of this hooee was erigiiially eeaetmeted In Ifii. In Ifli, the Bow lettee reqeeeted and were granted variances to allow constroction of roM additions, an attached garage, and a ne« deck. The original house ess ooestructed partial If In the d«l5* tone prior to the 75* eetbaeli raqeirseisnt adopted in 1975. In exchange for variance approval to allov the rooai. garage, and deck additions in 1976. the applicants were required to reeove a 2Q*x20* concrete patio located ehoot iO* froa the shore line. This patio has never heen reaoved. leceuse the existing house is eonstrucrted with *wing-well* extensicme ebout 2* out froa the house, with overhangs, the proposed eunrooa will not eppear to exteiid any closer to the road than the existing house, aa can be aaan froa the plana asbaittad. Thera would not appear to be any significant iapacts on the character of the neighborhood, and no light, air or open space ia encroached upon. The herdehip would be the location of the existing houae and the narrow nature of the lot which allows virtually no uaabla building envelope without variances. Staff Based on the infoimetlmi noted ebove. steff would recoesisnd approve I of the proposed sunrooa addition, subject to renoval of the 20’x20* concrete patio on the lake side of the house, such patio to be recowed prioc to issaaneei of a building perwit for the suni II a mmi 5 "* '*'‘-11—TTil III C1T1 is:'" r Aff OHh VAf nally constructed in I9€f. inted variances to allov ’age, and a new deck. The )-75* 2one prior to the 75* I for variance approval to L975« the applicants were >cated about 40* froa the ith "wing-wall** eMtehiiolil proposed sunrooB will not existing house, as can be d not appear to be any borhood, and no light, air would be the location of ot which allows virtually I would recoiRmend approval > removal of the 20*x20* such patio to be reroved inrooai. '’Mm bmjLciyif m citf m mama - tnaihacB aptlicati Initial Appllcaiiwi fee 1150.09 I§50.00 per each addltlocunTwarlancel funeval Veriasoe Pee §75.00 Cbo change froai original applicatioal Alter-the-fact Pees (Double appllcatloil feel T .r*ai »•4-or"* ^ .fMMggf KKATIO* a • - • iite Address,3775 iafltdt Property ldSHiticicati«i voBDer ir.r.u.i ii\ -11 j..yi.yaoi i v - Please check one • Property I ibetract or ._ tcrrenaf if net included onAttach legal daacriptim to applicatioa required survey. Phone (hoeel 4 75-110<3> MM etf.K l C«i»<«c» t. to.l.ttt Vhemm <wor>il iUdr..«i i77i llo«d______ Citr» long im ll.i SS35> owm (if different than applicant)Phone (hone) Sane Hione (work) Address I Cityi tipi Data Property Acquired (nonth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the PUB18T OSl or PDOPITPT Present toning DietriCt Praieni Use of Prc^rty Other (specify) ResidentialitiaT^ DISCRIPTIOH IB8T Xstinated Construction Cost $ iQQQ^QQi Describe request in detail.i__Ail(LiLtLi-Q-ni-. Of GregnJimi-ta. VARIADCB8 MBQOIRBD Lot Area Lot Kidth Hardcover Setback Variances ( X Front Side Rear) Other ip V.mIf, . T''.'.'''u?-? ^ 'il rjr Mscrlb«ofi4i»# h«fd»liip or practical difficolty rasoltin^ fres ttrlct wiforcwmt of soqIii^ fa^latipoai iii«a» m »>»» ffya 2itf *!igBt ill ftaadlAflhLl atll a# ihiain.^ Airmet^^ iafA t ^ur pritacV.* acribo unuaiial proparty coMUtioea pravMtiii^ coapliaaco with tonifif -* QQlaft ant eioAaiL La thm tw.. f * ?, XiiSa. ^,2tfH - itt-4fA..-Paf alr fillJuftfl la a iJtaga. fcfliaft f hm rt^uiraaaati for ifttici §1 110#^ !• Coaiplatad Applieatloo fors Carting Proparty CNnara List of oimora within ISO* Cyos IKiit obtain thia Hat froa HanAapifi County Dapartaant of finan^ A«tOl (Beat Canter a40*327U. Btaapad# lofal alaad anvalopaa Cl10) pra-a4draaaa4 to aach of the naaaa on the above Hat with no ratern addraaa Cwa# addirtii liibala ebtainaO with property ownara Hat). Cartificata of ayraay inclwdino hardcovar caicwiaiioea aa required. TopoqrapKie aurvay Caaiatinq and prepoaad alavaUona) if any chanqaa in aaiatiaq qrada are propoaad. Plat Nap Cobtaiiiad with property ownara Hat). hm aa addeadiw to thia appHcaiion, plaaaa attach a aaparato Hot of any other paraona you wiah notified of thta appHcatiOf). Additional Itaaia aa nay be raquaatad by City ataff. the Applicant and Property Owner aunt aiqn thia application. flaaaa raeanbar that your variance application ia not eonplata if the above information haa not bean included. Certification by Soninq OapartMnt that variance Application ie cooplete. Xoninq Official's Signature ______________ Date APPXJCAIf¥*S SlGNAItUB The applicant haraby aqraea to provlda all information required or raquaatad by th# toninq Adaiiniatrator. aqreaa to pay all faaa and/or unusual ajq>anaaa Incurred In review of this appHcaticm. and certifiaa that the inforauition supplied la true and correct to the beat of his/her knowleCqe. h- T#'- Applicant's Signature Dote ^gV ONMimS SICHhTOU The owner hereby ackowledqes and agrees to this application and further authoriies reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# Cofamisslon members# and Council members for purposes of InvastigS' tlon and verification of thia request. Owner's Signature Date i n Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Cdomission Hastings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must ba present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled SMeting# please make arrangements to have m an~ ^ ^ ** j r siiaarvv* «« a. m. ^ authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building * Zoning Office - - .of this change prior to the meeting. . 5S ► a ulty r«tultiri9 from strict ■fail gp.M XJjAd Ai emr t l Y jkrr t>At^ dtrAfllj/ Intft t Ifttrhaw r privacy. ing complisncc with toning er to thi> rf\MA »h*n tHfl SDAgg^ Wh»n th^ stfaack at that tint. thin 150* (yoy must obtain Finance A-603 Gowt Center -addressed to each of the Sress (use address labels tlculetions as required, llevetions) if any changes attach a separate list of applicetion. r staff. his application. Please ot complete if the above Application is complete Date information required or > to pay all fees and/or Lcation, and certifies that ; to the best of his/her Date "7^1*^ irV 8 application and further f City staff, consultants, for purposes of investiga* offices 25 days before thej Meetings are held on the’ present at all scheduled incil. If an applicant is :e arrangements to have an ise the Building & Zoning . •* ._ m-. - "t: ■c*t i‘ I'i :U:i ?1MI 3S»I ; ieK\= 3T -* f\:-t 1 I f*{ 9 m\ ^ ■,% V ',?■ ' J >, I ^ Sf^ C I istJLfe 4 i 9 ■t 1 Go Jm tmUi n»nlf Vm 9U Iftt iftpifty tt STf% Ivmii Aoni. IkiM If ^ pnrsrtv vltii liUcfi crrvrlciai faroblMp •# «KPr cscwiMRt «f jist fm^m4 tA l«7f • nimw^nt #f 1^ Sifwt. lAt Icc^icM 9# ^ Qlftliit iiffllint a»t cmtvm to tftt ttrm »tter iwiment ef $9 ft. ■Mt •# 72 ft. «r. If wm rt>«antUit viriKai fmi ^it wt hmA rmlivHit f»r m aiiltlai m tfelt cittttAi «tf«etuf9. TA* 36* 1 2i* aMitlaRi cautttt 9f • dlAlAf fMB, »f«w< (Mtin mI ■ M &f ftti«t. TAt mAKis H li» PfCBPigd aMltljSB «eial6 bt 16 ft. fiw tAt UkrsAeiv aid 20 ft. ftw tA* tmft erepAtTr itM TAtftfbft. lA* 9triaK«f ranattcd vouti A* f ft. ftta lAt liteAeff g»t back rtquirwat nf 30 ft. ffm tA* iffitl ittAadI riaitrawnt froa fAa T5 ft Idttriioti harfcattr aatAacA af 371 ta. ft. tor tAa aditiAi oantractloR md 400 sq. ft. tor tAt infaiwiiiil atoiUlR tor a total af 771 f0. ft. of AarOcoiat. TAa eilttist stractma iiiclia6tf a 20* t 29* eoicmt patio todt toeing tAa laltofAofa. Ifr. Hsviatta ftas aitaai to lami tAlt 490 tp. ft. of Aato covtmd rtplaca Hat idth a tra ippiwH. THa aanata araa of tAlt prspotad otdltian oftMilnt into tAa 7S ft. laka- >Aort fotAarJe %P0iald not ticaad 200 sq. ft. TAlt aould rtsalt la a nat da* erttsa of aardcoatr of 290 tq. ft. fU'ffwn orwstTrN ifrrr*n . to«rii 5, if to lAa OMtfion ifcgaatndiJ to tAt OtiaicU approval of tl« takeahort and ttrtat satback requmt conditional unon reaoval of tha 20* a 20* eoncTota dtek Aaing i^actd by a noa-otrvieus tvna deck Aacaufo the CItv »uld gain a 200 gq. ft. in hardcovar. OlfClL ICETINC • kpHl 12. Ifto lAt Goiaicil emeurped vith the flaming Gooiiision • Approvid [I aiii0ii''ani I r iM .'■■V %.’.vJlk!'V-i‘ll it - ‘ I ^ * r'« an V cp?u> WE^rr wTi.OkTrr. C.Tt *^?ip »-»!•^waTi-i:_T^: IrTI; laCTPCflsip: .•?•—tdJCi: ffA4. ±lli: liH !^.nitf 7f/> J^ifyraBk • «i I rw* M « FADcrpAL snucnro tytt tet: na Aim □ifir. %ur ftdn Fir: T^dth M nr: nith Srrth 1C Atm sna 3>pth IL A iCmB Ttn 9l#t.Qiepltftim r«*4i VariMi VLKn PEvrr* cif ^ - A ,Ji m 14H U^Nsft: Tts ^imds: Tn ».n Area Fr^. Setbacks: nmt %ar Slda Uka /iftiviwn* ijsT surrnr Imi wi:^ hv ? *: tf «PC.W SL jlUasl -s^«- State Surchef^t a*C Ciarga : wiBs t« ru:« irvoc^ to xjci, a campiuci; or* SURVET OF TIE UJT, A'O ‘TC WAV PfeTilT' FFE. ■n»e lAdtrsl^wd heivbjr aakes raltration far a ixtild Iftf oeimt for the lork drscslUj, ii«ms t.. dti OT work in ttiict aocorjnco with tha ordiitances ct tie I City of OfCfio mtd luIiAfs of tba State XUdinif Cour * Divlaion* md dsclafet that all rarta and rcpjnwoa- taticna stated hare'ji aro two mi cnnact. 9 mm 9 T.'>c«'c. »o si0uir^ 155 mm I Afc I ♦ \ J MaaoI ii^ C^rissioo CttairMa OroiM> l»l«iiniiif CoMilaiioii Mcitera City Mto i.ni %trator B«rnh«r^i>oii Pf«t A. inildia^ t Soninf A^lnittrator eat* I Aofutt 19, 1989 11315 Couatrytid* Manor Bo—oimora* Aaaociatien* lRt#rM*et2on of Mi How Orlvo tiid Coontryoido Driv* vari«nc*i » toblle BoarifiB Sofiiift9 Oialrltrt Bortliiaat ^^^naiioeB • 1. S«ctica 1C.03« Sttbdivialoa IS fC) • Mail oxeaoda allowvd HoAfht of 3%* - hoiyht varianco raquirod. Ka^irod *3*8* 9rotoaad • 4*5* Avoraf# tiaioht of aiid ooetloni Prc^ osaJ • 5*3* At aouth oida of aooth aonfawnt whari thara la a drof in yrada. varHnca • ‘ or Hit 2. Saction «.o.3i« 8n*>diirlolon 9 Ci) « Satback aarianea ra^lradj baeaiif# wall «xt tad* 4*|* haiobt. Raquirad *50* Profiosad at Ml Ho* Dr ■ 9* Profoamd at Countrysida tr • 4*8 * Virlanca at MUlo* Or • 43* or 581 Varianca at Coontryalda Or • 45*4* or 501 3 Saction 10.03, Subdi%«aion 18 - traffic viaibllity. Mo fancaa, stractora or {^lantingi aora than 3* high in a raaidantial diatrict on cornar lota ahall ba (laraittad to obatryct traffic viaibility within a triangolar araa dafinad aa followat baoinning at tha intaraaction of tho |?ro)actad curb linaa of two intaraacting atraata, thanca 30* along one curbed lina, thanca diagnally to a |;oint 30* froM tha (oint of beginning on tha othai curb line, thanca to tha point of Iwginning. Staff haa confiraad that tha atructura doaa not ancroach tha praacribad traffic viaibility aatback araa. Upon inapaetion, maad>ara will nota the concrata blocka and tha marking out in tha road that dafinaa tha triangular viaibility setback area. List o'' Bxhlblta Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B -* Applicants' Addendum Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit 0 - Elevations Exhibit E - Setback Sketch Exhibit ? - Site Plan Exhibit C - Staff Latter to Applicants Exhibit H - Countryside Manor Plat (East Section) Exhibit I - location of Road Within Defined RIght-of-Way biJ=. • V m •• Haiti . 2 i 1 foning Pi August 18 Page 2 of llavlaw of Tha If I lad by Aasociati own risk aicaadad t hv tha prop< where tha can ct.nf vialbil1 fravlaw i Cour Countrys: City wilJ nota that tha corna has ravia and wa fi pattarna Oiractor landscapi prasant a be nainta execute a within th< of-way of Staff Raco To ap proposed intarsacti findingsi 1. T1 roads 2. t: satba This i 1. T Orono 2. A| harm 1 drain publi< ilnistraior locifttion^ '•Ida Driv# exceeds allcnfed height of (nd sections »uth monument where grade. tback variance required or 90% c visibility. No fences* high in a residential tted to obstruct traffic Ba defined as followst ojected curb lines of two f one curbed line* thence of beginning on the other fling. does not encroach the Upon inspection* members ing out in the road that Ba. :ion) ^ight-of-way m M 'i em. •w r- A':Mmm tmim Fils I1J19 Aegost 10« Page 2 of 2 of Mpgiioetioii The eoostreetlM of the aonwenti(il.* b« Hr Ml 11^.-----------------------mtfr th« ciiiUc.UoD w.a ••• *1. a l.tt.r that ha ancaaia^ at hla ___Ttir «»'<>»•>• 9»«nta« tot th* ttxactur*. If itexceeeee tne allowed 1%* height frewi«ii Exhibit 6). The applicants were reguired to the proposed eootments woald exceed where the poets were to be constreeted can confirm that the monesants are visibility protection tone# confirs free lew Exhibit 11. file a variance application becaui# the allowed !%• height at the sides to hold the lighting fixture. Staff not located within the JO* traffic ed also in the applicants* sketch CeyBtrV.?d7Si?t.®fiT.!. *• ! road*.,, aoa at th* tima CIM tooldcryatal Bay Road and atfirovad. th* *V*^ ^ oalntenance of Countryside Drive. Review Exhibit R. the eor^re^A# located within drainage eaBaments defined at “‘••»»*«t»on with ttlUe* Orlv*. staff wl location of th* oenuaaot* with th* Rublie hork* 01r*cter and we find no interference by the moniments with the existing drsinaoe Director final grades of the plat. The Public Worka laBdsc«^ieo*i« attention to the fact that there is an island withndecaping in the center and the close proximity of the monueenta mmv K'^rntrini'n- irobi*** It tii uL th*‘ 1 HolA *.* J***? **’•* *’’• “o»«o«"-r.- R..ocl.tlonClThli th. »9r*«Mnt ba.*d on th* location of th* atructor*. oJ^iiP r.l.tlon to tho ..tback of th. rl,ht- Staff Repf—einiatioo • _ height variances for the wa 11/monuments int^Vilction’^of "o»«o*n.ra' Association at tha finding.!^ * wiUow Dtlv. and Country.ld. Driv., baiad on th. following • h«*«r< for tho oMrs of th* public roads* Willow Drive and Countryside Drive. Thin approval is subject to the following conditions; Qrono*'*^ applicants obtain a building permit from tho City of public’rordw.,!" *^*** *“**^‘° drainagaway. or maintaining tho futur* ... V,. -;,v^W < i • . •<v«^ ^•• •••:^ aft«r tho application iraa Countryaid# Roaieownara* tr that he proceeded at hia for the atructyrea it it ;). fiance application becauae Id aif*^ height at the aidee le lighting fixture. Staff Bd within the 30* traffic n the applicants* aketch roadway, and at the time lay Road and approved, the Drive. Review Exhibit H, Lnage eaaements defined at with Willow Drive. Staff the Public Korka Director Lth the existing drainage ) plat. The Public Works t there la an island with «ity of the monuments nay time the City plows would a Homeowners' Association Location of the structures the setback of the right- 18 for the wa 11/monuments »rs* Association at the re, based on the following ar the users of the public meet the required 3%* high snd of each wall section. i ■■i/ik editions : ^' ■ permit from the City of It S rreement, holding the City i a result of maintaining r maintaining the future ^0 If .4**i:-'. : ■ 'mSSA . i- I ciTf m * WARlIun ATFLICATtOH Initial Appllcetlco fe# IlSO.Od 1950.00 per each eaditionel verle Renewal Variance Pee 975.00 Cao chafige fron original applieetiont After-the*Pact Peea fDouble epplication feel 'M'\^ X «J’ i • a * m PDOriDTT I4)CATIO0 Site Addreea • ut i 7 0f / J if.a . • •' t ’i»V Property Identification Wuaiber (P.I.D.) Pltaae cbecli one - Property >' iibetract or m rr:> torrene? Attach legal description to appliretion If not Included on required survey. APPt.lCJiaT <1 M f V Phone ihamm}r/ • j 1 «I < Addreesi ’ ^ U a. Phone < work I f* V> T*y O lipt «•- 4» (if different than applicant I P hone (horn) Mmz Wane Ph^e Cworkl Addreest City I Sipi Date Property Acquired (iionth/y#eir7 I (do) (do not) else own the adjacent parcels of lend. rwMsmn ost Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) 'Sa a» I Di^RiPTioii Ksm Rioaisy Bstinated Construction Cost $ I r- Describe reque*.*- in detail:A../ • / / mm mmmmmmtrn WytlAPCra RSOOIRBD Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover SetbecJs Variances (Front Side Rear) Other ^ r k,.^ / / • // HIII 'r • ..m fa . RAfU)j DSKn 7* The reme info; Cert Zonii APPL The requ unusi the know Appl owwi: The auth< agon tion Owne Appl Plan thir revi unab authi Offi. cify) ction Cost $ It <1 ^ ^ ^ / * Hardcover Rear) -y*"^ - ~y mIK ^ .jdkdfc*! - DescrilN» un$%»m her^ehl^ or precticel difficulty rvMltlfi^ frds etflet eoforc—nt of toning roovlat loos i ^saumon or vmocvAL Fmmmrf atmmm^ Deacrilw uooeoel property cofiditieee preventln9 coi^llance eitli toniny Cede Reyuirenentai _______. n 1. 3. ringp sosiirnuLS 4. s. ft. 7. Ccnpleted JippUcation rem Certified Froperty Oimert List of oenere eiihin 150* Cycii ttoal detain this liit ftom Hennepin Oemty Depertatet ef finance a-ftOl Oovt Center I4t-137ll. steeped, leyal eieed envelopee (#10> pre«eddreesed to eacli of the nanee on the above liat vith no return addreee (uee addreet lehett obtained with property owner# list). Certificate of eurvey includiny hardcover celculetione ee required. Topoyrephic survey iesittiny and proposed eievetiona) if any chanyea in exietiny yrade are proposed, flat Nep (obtained with property owner# lietK A# an eddendun to thie application, pleaae attach a separate liat of any other peraone you wiah notified of this epplicetioii. Additional itees as nay be requ«|ted by City staff. The Applicant end froperty Owner nuat siyn thie application. fleaee rene*^ber that your variance application is not conplote if the above information has not been included. Certification by toniny Department that Variance Application i# oomplete. Zoniny Official's Signature Date AFPLICAHT'S SlGMATtlHS The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information reguired or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied le true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. . OatoApplicant's Signaturs OMliERB SlGHATimE Ths ownsr hsreby ackowledges and agress to this application and further authcriies reasonabls entry onto the property by City staff, consultants# agents. Cosnission xtcmbers. and Council members for purposes of ir.vestiga** tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all subnittals into the City offices 25 days before tho Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building ft Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. : ■ resulting tram strict crcncpliance tritb IcHiin^ •» '•>mm m»<m m ISO* (you Kost obtain ance A*603 Govt Cantar raaaad to each of tha I (uaa addraaa labala .atlons aa raquitad. itiont) if any changaa ich a aaparata lilt of .Ication. f£. application. Plaaaa omplata if the above icaticn ia complete. Date ormation required or pay all fees and/or .OHr and certifies that the beat of his/her Date plication and further ty staff, consultants, purposes of investiga- Date ices ?5 days before the etlngs are held on the ‘sent at all scheduled .1, If an applicant is rrangements to have an the Building & Zoning 1. tjang HTt otiwneleiimi iO'H: fF 1.9^ »mmQ9Tiam mcffm fm iMOK^ram or Mtum ^•Tf j .iriii i 1 fKfVlSI i l. M viand Sf id* in he4#s: and apfetadaiately 14 fe^ rasdnq tawgj tti (aicnqi the ciavel* b. Ebcti imll will here an «d par^ esch lodf iddiii «lii be li* iqumre and ST in mm and paH mil have s li^it flsturv on top* a. CbiinWyeide Orivsi Piet froi OTterlinsi I IRslii frott wdfi' of pawMt i.S Peat fitm ptetjerty line. b. mmoM Orlvei 41 PM fm oM^Unei 33 Pvet fite edp eC pavwJBti 7 PM froB intfierty line* e. Trees and ehrafaery iwCTudfnii 30* in hel^Nt: ahall 1 laliiiid the ngnMMi. SNfUbefy loostad in front of the H be 30* or lams in 3. Comer IHanglm the entire) nontamnt #isii be conetroctadi oidisidb the *30 PpcOi trianeie* et amdh aide of the intareecUcn. the front of the nmiBmnt, 40 Inches in hed#t, tfmll be tanqpnt to the ■ 42 Pact trianile* line, the end poets, S2 inchse in hidglit, thsU bo tnent to ths *4d Rot triangle* line. i. dectrlcmJ mringi a. tbdarground idrlnri, Inside pipe* h countryside Oriva, in orloi to pttmda pcsHr sonunent.• IM f b. MSP has installed a poi-er hgolt-«|> at tha Kssnant alta, and mil install a mater on the beck of the north aide pon«nt. S. ibterialet a. Ihe momamrits tfiall ocnaiat of concrete block footings 4 baloe ^ade, an! brtwn, *usad brick look* brick abova grade. b. the landeoisfing ahall consist of varlgat^ dogwoerf ahrube i Gblorade blue spruce trees behind the momioents, and Sea Green Junipers anS varigated hosts in front of the menunents. the hosi mil form an edging along Cdwtryslde Drive, but mil not approa^ Killoif Drive. The edge of Willow Drive and the current drainage ditch mu not be changed. c. Ground cover around the Junipers and hc»ta mil be shrfsddcd tree bark. Property 01* 117*2 Gary & 2375 loni Laki 03-U7-2: berrell 1 23iO Oev] bong baki 0I-U7-2J Wai a Doni 237S Devi bong Lakf 03-117-2: Leatar P] 2330 Lone b^g bak« 04-U7-23 Paul Natf 2420 Cour Long bake 04-117-23 David & t 2450 Cour L<»ig Lake 04-117-23 Phillip y 2435 Coun Long Lake 04-117-23 Eugene i 2475 Coun Long Lake 04-117-23 DICON 21350 Exc Excslaior J. D navra rv«d Will, MM viawad Lll be 40* in heigiit Lhe curve). 1, Which will be i§* VB e ceiTiji9e etyle j 8 Fbit free Feet (rem e of •hell be looeted! of the monupwif Kitslde the **30 Ftxit I front of the to the *42 Foot ^t# ^\ali be )e&i run under the light flxtufei nonunent site, and Lde menunent. lodi footing* 4 feet above grade. 3 dogwood shrubs and , and Sea Green nvments. The hosta t will not approach current drainage a will be shredded . . • t .1-lu .iaiilfS:eV'- ,, IFroperty Owdeee Etiei for Appt Icet I oa I131S Ccranirfside Aanor Soeieowief e ^eoc. oi-tn-ji 32 ms Gery e Sandra Lot tetter 3335 liOdfele* Circle Lane Lake, m S53SS S3-113<-33 33 SOU Oerrell Blener tltO Devin Lene Lone Lake, m SSISi 03-llT*23 32 0030 VB L Donne Feneer 2335 Devin Lane tiooe Lake, m S535§ 03*m»33 31 0005 Laater Floyd 2150 Loneviev Cit Long Uke, MR 55 350 rl*lf04-113*23 n Peul Retliefieon 2420 Countryeide Dr. S. Long Lake. MR 55354 04-U7-23 11 0004 Devid ft Linda CeHaingt 2450 Countryside Or. S l43ng Lake. Mi 55354 04-U3-23 11 0005 Phillip Miller 2435 Countryside Or. Long Lake, im 553H 04-117-23 11 0004 Eugene 4 Sarbara Hite Jr. 2475 CountLye*de Dr. Long Lake, tm SS354 04-117-23 12 0005 DICOR 21350 Excelsior Blvd. Excelsior. KS 55331 hr---.: P' m fs% I I % k # I 2< U V • ; E I h< I r- y c a< 1 t t a t: j, BUiLOII ASS ) ) • • ’•mum* M# • • /’ f • • «ir w r M J ■ ? V-^ .i.,.V .,0-‘t^h- ■ .- \t CITYttfORONO GSX23 • itaee^pii OSiHl Qm ^ Simm 0 Bfmnamkm AofQst s» ifii rDiilif) Miiuir 2415 Co«nitrysid« Driv« L4MI9 tails# 1^ SSISi Dftif HI. Mill#?i this Istisr is vrittsii to ssli tlisi yoo cc.itsct *y offies ss sooD ss itossil^ls. I hss« fsilsa in ay rscsnt sttsayts to contact yoo sithar via your of fie# ^hoas or by an insyocticm notico loft at yoor rasidonco on Tuasday# Auauat 2, 19II. As X bava advisad via an aarliar eonaarsation that you l^focaad at yoor ovn risk to oontlnua uith tha construction of tiMi aamuoants at the antranca to tha Oountryslda naiahborhood. Upon an inspaction with tha fublio Works 01 factor and tha City Eoalnaar# it appaarad that tha oonusants do not aaat tha 30* satback froa tha iatarsaction of tha curb linaa at tha intarsaction. In addition# tha aonuaant appasrs to axcaad a 4* haight. You wmrm also advisad that If you axcaadad tha allowad m* haight that you uara running tha risk of baing askad to raaova anything that axcaads thr.t alloaad haight givan tha satback of tha struetura. In OkJar to coaplata tha raviau of your application# ua would ask that you would hava a surveyor eonfira tha location of tha aonuaant fron tha lot lines is addition to confiruing tha 30* satback fron tha curb intarsaction lines at Willow Drive and Countryside Drive. Flaasa ba advisad that if a section of tha nonunant is located within tha triangular traffic visibility satback area# that you would ba askad to raduca tha struetura to tlM allowad 3 * height.^ Osca again# plaisa contact cy offica ao tnat wa swy discuss this asttar. Sincaraly Jaanna A. Mabusth# Building & Zoning Administrator JAH/tIn CC8 Stephen Richie# 2515 Countryside Drive, Long Lake# 55356 tt'tLm.NGa z(xuNC - 473-7 is? assmsing ADiilNISTRATlOiSia FIKANX K - 473 7 JSI a PUBLIC WORKS - 47 3-7339 -m • _ n®?? h •'r.***’ > E___m UC. 2251 TYofORONO •1 Bay. Minwiaaia OASM \tact my offic# at :temptt to contact action notict Itft nation that you matruction of th« dghborhood. Upon or and tha City not meet the 30’ b lines at the »rs to exceed a 4' seded the allowed f being asked to leight given the ite the review of I have a surveyor :he lot lines in curb intersection Please be advised ated within the that you would be ' height. hat we may discuss f Admini.Rtrator >ng Lake# 55356 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 iK.mm,*■I r 160 OmiTY AfiD Ot/ T Being 5 feet in AND 10 FEET IN UNLESS OTHERWISE V 1 : :! O OeN i Bearing ? .V •* F"''■''■■" ''Mai^-V.'V-F K • - • I ft \ ------------------------ .I r ^I * I 'L.LKji I 4^ I • //V- » ^ M %?l.l* t s I I SU. T &£«»****.- ® &wurw«»^-^ * M* A ) 0«nwtt« FreOUMd C't* 'V — -■ ■' o*not*i kwf**cc m-.'-tm ^foC> ^ro«o»d f*»«» • ».. -■'^ 9 « -PREPARED FOR: ;: ■ i?>- S/»€ J^/^ lOiowH t*B9» 9«B^ • #^pn««rt rr.p r* gitv JtNt M MARii > 0 ^Jf »;e • * ^ * s ^•» %■ CHAD MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. (I 4 '4„ •~s * ml:mmmIk: tOi Flat Orof Citj rroai Mich Daiat Aug\j Siibjact i iUl Vari Ajpi^licatioi} t«tb«ekt Icmiii^ Diatric timt of Sxhibl Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit r Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Psrtinant P«c^ 1. Hardcov#] |,ro|.«rtv A|.i; 1 lean by tlast hardcov< ■taff*s c has wash batwaan < the fini 29.41. undarsta garages : Setbacks, a second • wall with structure structure floor spac Applicant' setback 8* B because reduce th« the garag< existing c trees with mK -.S'I -<'-y Adminlitrator structure-to-atmetuf® i & Staff Motationa ting hardcover on the [)' zone and it 29.9%. wood chips underlayed %. The other area of is not hardcover in a is a little bit that (area west of garage* lich applicant prefers* i* final hardcover is L8%. Staff does not tinent between the two s. proposing to construct s the same foundation s would result in the resting an accessory area and total usable ied garage 10' east and refer not to do Option 3 will not able to Option C is to move 1 a 10* setback to the 5 he will loose 7 or 8 m s i toiling File 11 Hi August •# Ifit Page 2 of I Staff would recosuiefid that the garaga dloensions be reduced to save the trees rather than grant eariancea for structure to atructure aetbeck. An aitarnatlve would be to relocete the gafage entirely. 3.Acceaaory Structure Site. As noted above* If the old and the new garagea ahara a wall* they will be considered attached and will yield spproxieately 2*700 a.f. of usable floor area* an ••xceaa of 1*700 s.f. over the 1,000 s.f. allowed, foi a variance of 170%. Mote that the existing 3 car garage* with what appears to be a dwelling apace ebove it* coepriaea about 1,156 a.f. and already is uversisad. The new garaga* if detached, would coepiriae about 1*561 a.f., an axceas of 56i for that new building. As of this writing, applicant has not provided substantial Information regarding the need for all of this apace# but; has maraly spplio<* for s 990 s.f. •storsge garage*. Olscueeicm * There is no question that this property has soma severe eite constraints which limit the raalistic potential for developeent of additional accasscry buildings. The property already containa a detached 3 car garaga with a loft and what appears to be living apace above it, this structure being in excess of the 1,000 a.f. floor area allowed. That garage was allowed to be built in 1976, based on coda interpretations at that time which apparently considered only the footprint. Staff received a phone call fr*im on# of the neighboring property owners who was notified of this variance application, and that neighbor was concernsd that the property is already overused, by virtue of the fact that there is a aaparata apartment over the garaga and perhaps a third dwelling unit in the basement. As of this writing, 3taff has not bian able to verify whether these excess dwelling units exist* however there la a gas line going to the garage and a room air conditioner in one of the upper windows* and wo know that two plumbing fixtures ware constructed in the garage when it was built, hence there is high likelyhcK>d that this could ba used as a dwelling unit. Staff Ill'll i—M' iidsl I on ~ Lacking any substantial discussion by the applicant as to the need for this oversized garage with storage apace above it, and given the limited area in which to ronatruct the building* staff would strongly suggest that the applicant consider reducing the size of the structure in order to meet the required 10* setback and still allow the trees to remain. Alternatively* it would seem that a garage could be developed to the v'est of the existing garsge* which would eliminate the need for the gravel driveway and pavement behind the existing garage. Staff could not recommend approval of applicant’s Option A* since this ultimately creates an extremely large accessory structure on a res-lential property with no real hardship being shown. Option A would also require verification by a structural engineer that the existing foundation to be shared would support the added structure. Notwithstanding the excess size of the structure* Options B & C may not have as great an effect on existing tr^*es as the applicant expects* and trees could be saved by reducing the si^e of the structure to a degree. fr- f| i; 5 ^1 Zoning File #1316 August 6, 1988 Page 3 of 3 Staff would recoftiiaena the following course of action to the Planning lission: 1. Regardless of what structure is ultimately approvedr hardcover should not increase above the existing 29,9% as shown in the staff hardcover review. 2. Maintain the 10* required setback from the rear lot line 3. Maintain the 10* required setback from the house and existing detached garage, unless a reasonable hardship is shown to allow that setback to decrease. 4. Unless a substantial hardship can be shown, applicant should cut down the total floor area of the structure to meet the required 1,000 s.f. maximum floor area standard. 5. Staff would strongly recommend that alternative sites within the property be considered for construction of this garage to minimize its impact on the property; for instance, placing the additional garage west of the existing garage, to minimize the need for steep driveway and its added hardcover (see Exhibit X) Finally, I would note that the property owner has not signed the application and should do so at his earliest convenience. m ^ ' -41 n-. *v''' I** ■’€#v,y ■ ’i ' . Mr r U ' ' / * --m mi t m m- a'-*- \r k. i V-. -.tm ^ A, >-■ .. CITir OF c Initial A ($50.00 Renewal V (no cha After-the PROPBRTF Site Addr Property . Please ch< Attach le required : APPLICANT Name Addrc ONMBR (if Name Add re Date I (do PRESENT OS Prese Prese DESCRIPTIOI Descr: VARIANCES ] Setbac Other Lon to the Planning pprovedr hardcover shown in the staff lot line. louse and existing ihown to allow that pplleant should cut the required 1#000 re sites within the age to minimize its additional garage for steep driveway las not signed the N is ■ required survey. APPLICJUn Name I CITY OP OlKNlO “ VARIAMCB APPLlChTIOM Initial Application Pee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional varian Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Pact Pees (Double application fee) >V PROPBRTr LOCATIOH Site Address Av* y, , TSS9/ I* r u'^ Li\Ur(U Proprty ld.ntiflc«tion N„«b.r (P.l.D.) torrens? < .rrv ^ ^ ?T”Please chec)c one — Property y' abstract or f / f * de«cription to application if not included t.. . .Li.a IL on . :nnf\ # L.'!-*r. at • » » ✓Qa4J sc Phone (home) ^ * ' * At ^ Phone (wor)c) ^ff®***—_ _ _ City» UJA\/7M’ia zjpt ONIIRR (If different than applicant)Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address i o 3 V cd> A/. Cityi Ziot TS37/ Date Property Acquired _ _(month/year) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FRBSBNT OSB OF PROPERTY ” ” —™— Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Rxsrj^^JuJ Residential _ Other (specify) DBSCRIPTIOB op RBQOBST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; VARZAHCBS RBQOIRBD Lot Area Lot Width Setbac)c Variances ( Other Front Hardcover Side Rear) •» » /f) F* t S^T8/(CK Mi'w Z?) fy/i d) a;© /'sS0 2^S i»^crt$djco A»* me-c s uox r i TRess Kos r 7-f Tfiepi /u>sr , . * . y-.‘ HARDSHIP Descri enforc DBSCRIPTIOI Descri Code 1 IRBD SI Comply Certil this ] v348-3d Stamp names obtair CertiC Topogi in exd Plat » As an any o1 Additj The Applic remember t informatior Certificati Zoning OffJ APPLICANT*C The appli« requested unusual ex| the inforn )cnowledge . Applicant*I ONMERS 8161 The owner : authorizes agentsf Con tion and vi Owner's Sic Applicant Planning third Mor review me unable tc authorize! Office of '■t:-- : s rj9/CITY if OROaO I- j. iifiriCE IFF ICE / *}V JL UL.lt -QO-ggi FCOCCOOOO Sf rens? ided on /• iittk't.. . Luts *- *•* ; ^ ^ • i«- /* il?h* vni I •f * • , • Ik • / jy . ■; r*. * T" *w rr u'iLufu 1/ l /iv'i I J ^ •> »rk) V>/»7o.^J" !_____ Zip I x^CSf/ V7-/ f >rk) Zlpt . (month/year) land* Residential ) n Cost $__?j~eio cover I'"Rear) f • 3^ • VV”-. HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty' resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP ONOSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: IRBD SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain .this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A*-603 Govt Center *^348-3271) WNcio. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-*addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OMNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. CHmer's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, pleare make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting F^F-.-x Lting from strict lance with Zoning (you must obtain Govt Center d to each of the s address labels \B as required, s) if any changes separate list of .on. Lcatlon. Please ^te if the above on is complete te :lon required or all fees and/or ind certifies that best of his/her ition and further affr consultantsr ses of investiga- 25 days before the s are held on the at all scheduled f an applicant is ements to have an Building & Zoning -'J r' HI if! ■- ■ "'■■A ■r] i SSI m "S'.*’') 111 .vk-a / ^ - • V»' ^ . V “ ' ♦ /'-I •» MrW&j v\ y \ V V X i s ^ . : 'a - •' \ I /ik, f \N > %-r 4 • *# . r» «*J>1C 7 ly'a*'' • •A-u 106 0£V Id«\ (n >' .• • :r V \ li' X 5* .*•; ^ X> t V ^ >c i.'vv\> Ay'* > -.X> V'*'. \ »X %,.Ve-.* V -^C-A "S- ^ vV” ■■ lT9\ r>S "® ■ ‘ \ » * /I ^181 •d'*' .V H <N •f •; »«- 5 •» ? • 1 V^._____"V> i«L \1 / A \:•IYk" i ^ •A vv 1 »o'* irs- 13 (•f •V |C.«; ^55 4^r.^'l -j i/ »67 'm V *e? IS k^C. 53 ,< !56* l'«' \ X .... '-/.W/i'’ A'O 'j^0\ it -- 151 k .. K > #*» B .r*'2- ,4i-\ ,9^. N .. • . f •A ■-./ V / , -!•« / ‘ «• ft--; i >ttV 06''*- t • f /». &C.0 » / y r. > ■ • : I ■' '■ .yrfi5-:t. fS 42 /;‘-j "xl k'«i .Z:^v i SrnmM s iSs-1 IV > M ^ m O cn in 3 eg lA in a s 9!§i. -3"i o a K> 3 V . . -V- ■'}■I: .■ ,v- :®;>L#i:v|Kvi'-^;::^:''^^ .V i:f,.., .. .V ?•:• './/•S‘ .- .-/u:* ..N Ui O' >.s _.. ^ O < < M---------u :§S|ii§£ [ K1 i js ^o o o lO ro til II) “ ift ftM «Ju < O UJ 2SSr rM M < ^ U UJ U H h<» O (0 N UJ UJ K >. ro UI UJ <\i o ^ *j ro r— 9 3 UI o < 92|u ill fto “9 yi o jg o o O U HC>i tA ft S S o 9 ^ in ^^ >2 ^ o >•CO K) Q u HI ^ m o UJ UJ M i; >•/ m j4. -'■■-immm0m i 1^-mm.■ :.K.. \ ••■■;^ V ^■V-...:':|;,;,,;^- i.irVtr «?• 0iwC^ •• ww*Hennepin County, Minneuta a m:n M uy|'">'R' 1^ I hereby certify that this is a true und correct repre sentation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 3,Block 1. CASCO COvE, «in J iho iocation of any existing hardcover thereon, it does not purport to show any other improvements or encroach ments. COFFIN S GKOffflERG, INC. . GronDer!»firK 5. ^onoe^i'8 ic." N'br 1^!/bb Engineers, Land Su: veyors and Planners Long Lake, Mirincso«a July i: America 3600 SI Wayzati The Bu. build! review in ord< 1. ii I woul< not inc certifj Please pursue Michae] Asst. S ASSI E2EZ3 % 0 0.9 f •ikif Jht • 0 0. 0 - -7 X ^y^mt' y^ ■ ,..■•*•“ y-.'*/ » that this t repre- of the k 1. CASCO y existing t purport to encroach' #1 i/i5 3 Planners \ >■; : ■ '-.■ ''n A ..V. ■•■■.; ■■••I ;.f 11 mm krII ■ le- i ’ ii •Ibi: ClTYofORONO Poet Office Box 66*Crytrtal Boy, Minncooio 65323 eMunkipol Officoo ,0N05tiya On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 11a 1988 Anerican Builders & AssocietiSa Inc. 3600 Shoreline Drive Waysatar MN 55391 Res Proposed Storage Garaget 3034 Casco Point Road The Building 6 Zoning Department is in receipt of your application for a building permita which was received by this office on July 7a 1988. A review of the application finds that the following variances are required in order for this garage to be builts 1. Maximum floor area allowed « laOOO s.f. The proposed garage includes usable floor space on two floors. Any second story space with headroom in excess of 5* is considered as floor area. Your second floor contains approximately 554 s.f. of usable space for a total of lr536 s.f.f exceeding the IrOOO s.f. maximum. 2. Orono zoning codes require a minimum of 10* setback between the structures. Your proposal shows only a 3* setback. 3. Per your engineer's calculations, existing hardcover in the 75- 250* zone is 35.5% where only 25% is allowed. Although you are proposing to remove ground cover in exchange for structural hardcover to reduce this to 33.5%, unless you can reduce to 25%, staff does not have the authority to approve such an exchange without City Council approval. I would further note that the proposed plans are incomplete, since they do not Include details and sections for the walls, nor do they include a truss certification. Also, a second set of plans would be needed for review. Please contact the Building & Zoning Department at 473-7357 if you wish to pursue the necessary variances in order to construct this structure. Sincerely Asst. Zoning Administrator cc Gary A. Barr 3034 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MH 55391 A ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 ;.r V ::^¥:- -i •: E^r'H. e r of ORONO U Minnesota 55323•Municipal OfReaa application for a n July 7, 1988. A Lances are required le proposed garage second story space Eloor area. Your iisable space for a urn. etback between the irdcover in the 75- Although you are bructural hardcover 25%r staff does not thout City Council lete# since they do hey include a truss tded for review. 7357 if you wish to Ls structure. PUBLIC WORKS - 473-73S9 V •*. • % \i \ r-z \ Nl: • ^•" i I ••• I ri I il •• i»*‘ * »»• '• *'^ f,«t ««1i V A »*•'«♦ I..I 1. P1-* 1. '*•"• '"»• |l>1Htr'|illl nil>n*"’<•? •’ t .»•'<7. '^!w ^ M •i^. ^o f».0 »A !f| // j% .%1 * f W. f J. #l» ! ^#9. •9 -» a , ... ---—1 . - 1.1' /.•JA'V- i V -lAtAiV tv). '4' .. .3..,. ';/> II M/viN (:\,JT:r ,1 .' rj!>‘J^yy y'' v‘V •••/'/ I tif I * 111 i f V ® * j I • .lit It*' IM I • ••• I **• I ‘ r nl ,il |**M «*l 1 ' Ml »'V •'* liMfiirl.il #*f I**! I f*|«w I I MVl ♦ * **'* I*f .1IIV 1*11 'll »iV»M ............... •* ’ **“• •hiiw .mv i»«i|»* «*••• w III ' M| ft I .'I I III n f.l M- I I 1.^ |»!l # • I lull II* »'t . I »M'I .*•; • .••»* I ’ ll'l I . M» mil . * I I#/' 4 ;V7-! i-iieg-v>'.v'm^ms.^,.,,||WI« 7. I/. I o V» 7. -‘.'.^-'v- *v • .• V *• > ty * ( I I i f V It .in-l • Ml I rt I , » II, ..,»y 1,1 |.*i I n|i'«i |t IMII ttf Aliv II I •»•» f|M| •• tIH III ' M| f t • i« n*‘ I. It; «..»!• .'|l*<l M* t fm -■rr t.^V • :>v- ■ b>if i. ;/.■ V-^' 5^;. —'\r:z^ y.5 ■> r-i ! ^ w : .^’ --.u - • • •• •' , ...;';vi^, ;■•. : :• _ ; ,■W:\r MM ■ frj 1 ^ JLh RLAN __ A BM. <i- •v.i'i SfOOJTlON of IIAr.t'O tvtK . I,<1/.1>.,II • ;''V:/,^ v'OVi- •• ■'S'l'i 'V''> ■ '.;■/■ y,*/- >, 'V,' f" ' ■1^0 TRtva uoyi VVIIM run a" “ o'li';...' »« * . i' 7rV . J./ hy / f ,r/»i*f —L / r#. I V A !,•• 1 Kl«, '4-<0^ >• ,»' . ■. *1 \ t.Otnor ^ '!) \ f ,©C}^ >•' , All ii» r •*. ■ i -iV I t« .;■ I c I ••<—‘ ■r I V« j It; — r..«i... '. '^‘. ■ V »'Sr Mini AU'n naiv I- * v. r wnti I I r.ii A # .V *« .. , J%> ♦ <• ( - 4.‘^\ \< . V» • ra ;l ii -.*•- • ■.4 * . i' ■ ■ ■. >■ .’;i iiiip'-f ;.^y:*;XXy ■T a-. • . • •«• * *.. ♦' •» .•’. ’. • 0 .n i , t ! f, , * % • *• » 4 Oftnoc V mBkh^y ■m-y^' y^yyy mm ‘'Mil wi ®j ' '^H '> J I. 0'tv\ ' . M ■i ■' v V V H Bva *r; Sa ! ? 1 is Si«ii -'*>*•^•1 r j ■■ :i ■* ■■-4- l'.-' b: Vs h / - T‘-«, ' ■ ■3. *:ip■■>••- -•;-v: :’'^-'-■v: ■ :Mm^IMM /jU^&covr^ J^jeyiirt^j 36^</ C4^xe«» Pt-. 3»«^r • * ^/JOP . -/Jo ky/snki(m ^AAbcov/f‘< "5'S’-2^T>* i ^/*>c4.MOi%t ^JtmT S‘A Fh«v^ A«<-c4-- z/^'-r ♦- aV^ rt>o e t ei^Sr^c. A46AfcKU>w«^ C®r*c UJm-kj brCK i''^o©S^ CHCft <!'<««■ P4.Z V«/*/;/r^ ^ /« . fc x/V.V ;v7 7V7 ^(..^ Vfc//vr ' |y y 7 /or ^ C X i.C 2/ Hxs ?2. 8xft 1 3^3 IHz, 7S-0 ^x's/a_VS //.5->^n.r Zo 1 /V^2# 8xi.r zoo ^or i.r 4/r 7SKZcy/2. /2 BO }l^/?/Z nt yo *»^?yA %^'ii^/z.I Z© ylr>/’Z.lOo \Hx ^^f^^/VI 2, so 2SC»® *' ■■*:i V i$SV•i’ '.•. v.-vv .-V ■Vc--. h ii i'l AJ 2^ ^ /7 /r/L 11 )*XS' rt®-<^Wiris» D»e^ r*^ ^6D pck,a-r^io 1 ^'JO ? ** 2© 7 ^3 ^o 2 I 2V4» fl.C.•7 ‘J'7/ i|. 71TI S ^ )«.«>?■•/av» V. I ' e>f\rr*^U V/al ,71-!/- a»r ■■ 7/Vfc s.i. .2i,9>^ ^A^(<rv cf**»row ysozir, rt>t4wo/»^ ^y i X <i.cA'>o4 ^ x-u — /6e»o . _ -*>c^D-*>r'*^/ooo » 75'il - 2’>.r K «— I tA-ir|n o^T7«n/S S •» C. y *•»■•*/«# CA,a4-^ «y ,^^>«.TAAt'>C ^4mt>« (^tryt^^T <*, H.C . <;^'r^to»♦«•^''v*rtAjo &u*ut<iAjaS ^.'^ tuW »CfA Lf K’t.b'T7f^^-M_ . CV"o<^ iA»<'C.f px*>*A'c»:r 7'^ C' PtXio j *1Vf tb/IWG^ 7/V^# -7^0 “7 S" -f <T/f 4-/bOO » 78S<2- «< *27. C 7/1/^- -7rt>-7r 4^ /oo© ^ '?7ra “z«7.a/. Mhwa liiii^ li .* i i *. ,- * *v '' ■ U <i:" -\^WFmi 'S'..;.' - ■ ' ■ mMKr:is mmW-'W\Ip c-'':- L. j|j ■ :ii EM ill£''i ^:--.p--j- wv :\ ., :v-r vll I#- pm TO* fItOiis DATS* SOBJs i 1 Zoning Dial tertlnont I f B in reXatio garage ia Accessory s principal x List of Bzh. A. B. C. D. E. P. G. Review of As Of of a revis the Count; trees with The applic approval i: met with 1 determine of the pro with the G the Count] =’T.-;'^kV :-.1><;- mt::i _x- ■ •- .v\ .' X:mm . • •I* . i>-,mKf -*'*-•mit ■■: U-.-vi'S bm h-;;-t-:: n h I " "111 iH m TO I Mayor Grabek and Council Planning Comnission Chairman Kelley Planning Conmiasion Members Administrator Bernhardson PROMf BATBx SOBJt Jeanne Mabusth^ Building £i Zoning Administrator August 12, 1988 Variants"* Publi'^^H^^^l * Brown Road South Soiling District *RR-lB - Requires 2 acres of dry, contiguous land Total Area - 11,000 sq. ft,; Property is sewered Pertinent Secti A. m of Code Section 10.03, subd. 15(F) Required “ 10* Proposed “ 5* Variance ■ 5' or 50% “ side setback for detached garage in Section 10.03, subd. 9(d) - location of accessory structure Structure within front yards - street side of m ^ ^ front of the front line of the principal structure pr!n “^5 rV."ltnce'! It tti C. Section 10.28, subd. 5(b) - street setback Required « 50* Proposed « 16* from platted County right-of-way Proposed * 58* from travelled Road Variance * 34* or 68% from edge of right-of-way List of Exhibits - A. Application Property Owners List Plat Map UBC **2903b** Spec Sheets for Proposed Garage Preliminary Survey Revised Survey B. C. D. E. P. G. Review of Application - As of the writing of this portion of the memo, Staff is not in receiot countvtravelJSd ^SaSway of met'Xlth both*® " 11™ sltef^StSffdete^ln. tXl Hennepin County DOT Representative to with'thX''G^®®^ garage. Mr. ZetterXtrihS conf ™me"d™t “ha^t he^™es*’So^probleS the*^Countv^XX there is no further encroachment Intothe County right-of-way. As soon as Staff is in receipt of the revised f;- . ■••••(• /-iVii wm WM f isi LlJ ■r ■miIt f 4'’ Zoning File August 12, 1 Page 2 of 3 survey, a co in writing c wlthi!'i the C Staff t preliminary within the f confirm tha< garage. A c the garage t branches mus Existin be replaced banks, thes ask that the excavation \ towards the of the garag tile adjacei garage will garage with 480 sq. ft. storage that The app on the prope to maintain i confirmed by many mature attaching the the limited severe varia Staff R< To appn for the cons property lo< findings and 1. The 11,000 sq. fi 2. Loca 3. Loca property. 4. Nee< property. Btrator id South -i > contiguous land >perty is sewered back for detached garage of accessory structure yards - street side of \e principal structure, of the front line of the tback ght-of-way ght-of-way Staff is not in receipt :h^ travelled roadway of Location of the matured urn around/parking area, not be able to recommend Lded on the site. Staff DOT Representative to ound given the location that he sees no problem rther encroachment into receipt of the revised Vrl. y.-: I V:; ; /> • . i-:. •; Zoning File #1317 August 12, 1988 Page 2 of 3 survey, a copy will be sent to Mr. Zetterstrohm. Zetterstrohm will respond in writing confirming the approval of the continued use of the turn around within the County right-of-way. Staff has attempted to sketch various existing improvements on the preliminary survey. The applicant has staked the location of the garage within the street yard. Upon a site inspection, members will be able to confirm that the existing turn around will still function for the new garage. A cut in the bank will have to be made at the southeast corner of the garage to allow entrance to the existing turn arund area. Mature tree branches must also be trimmed back. Existing retaining walls along the sides of the driveway will have to be replaced with new retaining walls to support the cuts into the steeper banks, these cuts will not exceed a depth of 5' to 6*, but we will still ask that the owner notify the affected property owner 10 days prior to any excavation work. The garage will be raised slightly to direct drainage towards the county drainage ditch along the roadway. Drainage to the rear of the garage will continue to be maintained by the catch basin drainage tile adjacent to the principal structure. Based on the spec sheet, the garage will be no higher than 11* 3". The garage is designed as a two-car garage with additional storage area to the rear. The structure consists of 480 sq. ft. and per the design of the rafters, there will be no upper storage that could be credited as floor area. The applicant notes the shape of the lot and the location of the house on the property as hardships. In addition, the Clews note that they wish to maintain the current driveway as it is in the safest location. This was confirmed by the County representative. In addition, they wish to save as many mature trees as possible, this is why they have not considered attaching the garage. The plan will also allow them to preserve as much of the limited rear yard area as possible. In addition, the Staff would add severe variations in elevations within the front yard. Staff Recommendation To approve the setback variances application of Duane and Kancy Clew for the construction of a detached garage within the street yard of the property located at 1135 South Brown Road, based upon the following findings and hardships: 1. The unusual pie-shaped lot and the limited area of approximately 11,000 sq. ft. 2. Location of the house on the pie-shaped lot 3. Location of the mature trees within the side and front yard of the property. 4. Need to preserve the existing curb cut to the severly limited property. r- x'i-i ■Mk .W □;.r m m ' - ■ ''1* ■ i Zoning August Page 3 6 propel topogi line. provii plan. must b the es retain Orono, Depart withir remain ^.>»/'^=.* ,*• •mt^^r ^ >itv . ••'? . ->-'-.w^.V!.^■r^ '• » :ter8trohm will respond use of the turn around 19 iinproveinents on the location of the garage »mbers will be able to function for the new bhe southeast corner of rund area. Mature tree driveway will have to cuts into the steeper 6*, but we will still r 10 days prior to any :ly to direct drainage Drainage to the rear e catch basin drainage on the spec sheets the s designed as a two-car i structure consists of tiere will be no upper B location of the house ws note that they wish est location. This was ir they wish to save as r have not considered to preserve as much of mr the Staff would add d. if Duane and Nancy Glew :he street yard of the id upon the following I area of approximately B and front yard of the o the severly limited i'.-- =; vs ? , Zoning File #1317 August 12# 1988 Page 3 of i 5.variations in elevation within the front yard. 6. The detached structure will have no negative impact on the property most affected by the placement of the garage. Because of the topography and the fact that the house is located 80* to 70* from the lot line# this approval is subject to the following conditions! a. Upon application for a building permit# the applicant must provide design information on retaining wall and a grading and drainage plan. b. The west side wall of the garage must have no openings and must be constructed as a fire resistant wall. c. The applicant must notify the neighbor to the west prior to the excavation of the west bank for the purpose of viewing the proposed retaining wall construction. d. Prior to the issuance of a building permit by the City of Orono# the City must be in receipt of a letter from the Hennepin County Department of Transportation approving the continued use of the turn around within the County right-of-way and the existing fence being allowed to remain. yard. negative impact on the garage. Because of the id 60* to 70* from the lot »nditionss irmitr the applicant must id a grading and drainage Rust have no openings and hbor to the west prior to of viewing the proposed ng permit by the City of from the Hennepin County Lied use of the turn around SI fence being allowed to iatsis^WSRlMSggll^* Vta.> ^ t f / CITT OF OROMO - VARIARCB APPLXCRTIOIf k Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional varia; Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After*tbe*~Fact Fees (Double application fee) 4^ 1 (.>17 PROPBRnr LOCATION rr-i-v *rwa # f vf t. n witw Site Address 11^65 vS . hirr.;/Kcj , uT;.A,-r rzcrrr i Wf f XUL. ^ w WV«» VI W Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) (0 - ( I CCOLfr^- rf ’iiW « .Jiff I h Jfc. V V » w Please checlc one * Property abstract or torrensv Vi - •rr**'^-7 4^a;».v vnii r-vtt r...r< tj < ‘(f. rrA4'^w<kV cvvii mvi *v Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. I'l? : - cv»/ w APPLICANT Name V>iUi(Sf\t.A \\\V\i \j (€W Phone (home ) iin*^ - I“?RU ___ Phone (work) MT3"5M87 Address; 1135“ (ofWn tcA City; IvlCLy ZCtf^ Zip; 553^ I ONNBR (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City;Zip; Date Property Acquired IA^{_ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (^q^n^T'also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) IPTION OF RBOOBST Estimated Construction Cost $ ln3otA Describe request in detail; VARIANCES RBOOIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( \T Front Side Rear) Other 17 rr-*v r: f f L'i ' i?y : i/n I*" i f 1 rni-L L't" C1 Lt ^ w'w*V«;» V/V WV n [7^lUjjQkcK01 JiA'.VTiV\/» V^' T< li. rens? ided on tv V m VV vnu t L*U rrj, V wvvl <'?vi f au *vi vr.TTOT^7v;A;:.v vn;/iStwL^i f ii:r.iti\ - •; Tivt: •*;A r 'raj c a i Ti f •/./ A u •' A7/V-/CV f / 1.1. / w un-r-nRi- >rk) 4T.V548~7 ^___ Zipj52^3_i il T !■# >rk) Zip: M (month/year) land. Residential m Cost $ Icover Rear) «v ' - -'' /r' •r ■i VO., i ^ rh1 HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; DESCRIPTION OF UNOSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning J t,* r,;.0 V r>tvy Vc \Xi\L-* A\y\gg_ V-< \x/v o Code Requirements: \l »^w R 1. 2. m ^ ^ K ~ 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. IRBD SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of ovmers within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature .Vw\sJ Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Sianature y^JCPJtj: i's Signature V- /IC «_a >_ _ _ _ _ Date 7 5 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. * ifi2ShW.-.■^i. r ^ resulting from strict compliance with Zoning VVg <T— Ow-A^C^ ^\aQ|^|n C x\. 4*V~ tX<V /^>t Al/’ tA'Sr-k AJ ^JL 150* (you must obtain mce A-603 Govt Center essed to each of the (use address labels ations as required, tions) if any changes ::h a separate ication. list of ipplication. Please >mplete if the above .cation is complete. Date >rmation required or pay all foes and/or on, and certifies that the best of his/her )ate »lication and further y staff, consultants, •urposes of investiga- )ate ces 25 days before the tings are held on the (ent at all scheduled If an applicant is rangements to have an the Building & Zoning 3i MM nil' ^la^fni til'll ■■ • • - ii- -> Sf'-i: ^ ■ <*i. tm mm 8^ 8^: 8 8 « o oe (K o ir> 9^ O O Kl a ^ iri nitt-"P|si!:3S9Si a-* S e H- lu ly o N S5SS-> n 2 S 5 Q Kl < inin i<ii a “ c3 2z < 2 M M h- M X-I o z u e: lo K o 2 X I 1 < _ 3 in >-f 9 o o S ^ ^ 'to ttiN ae c ui H OI X QC <O ^ 7 Z flO H^ m lu <•H > lA N S o m in S 31 i:g -91 in ui ui inM M O SSS5 io mo B c3§ysi 2*gS5S I^SiftSnS CO ^ < •'1*' ^lei# •t a <M CM IX t- H m K.g"“o5 <|i 3 ¥1oc ss..I _____ o V >- CO <in in in h m tn in ^ in >• u. lu a. ^ in u q: 8 )1 |M H M< H ly m o K S qc nK os P a u!*'^ HIpfet: S M SI< o o. a It.•I Ui H 0) ItlQSUi^g t“ig M OS“SS 1 -Vit i v1 1.*■ . 1 '* i W. - 1 -::. - ^ "*i ■r^lmm fij]T iuT^ 4-fV* s* H «a ty-<^P‘- ,» » ,W«I -4® I r' V v: I? v'v;m‘: Jf.m ■ ^-‘*- 'i- rn- -*-V « •I •*•••*< K.. **•• ^-'-««ESPCND;Na^4|.S VACATE0 (l) AHO ALLE" -f7'jO' -VJ vT iV • C5.^.1 •jfjm -V '24 \i. \' - ?'% - V ■■O »W- * v' 'V^ X -f <0 (S)619 # 5c* \P A " .''tCCOj Cz) % ^li ^ o 'S'• 11'' iV »* ' j.i“ * \’. ■•• s . • •...•r V? ^ V ------- \pj)V • X- /©>3 V &. ;SSBS£r V-*’ N - i.3^' 3^|j3 It! (-0 A i • 4» •. ?I>K i< x«o ^ . • !«7l V.- \ .0 /' V ,0 ir*. ;•! y. < \ X -I /f '* i\A k' *■♦> - n " .."^V > 4 /'.jM I .' ■ ./ii L-S ; V { / t I? ll “■'Jz/-": ioVio' _________ •'^“ ' iZ^Ls^oGSr--OlV ,,,4)r ■r iitil \o AUO^^, SUR, NO, 96 i ^^ACT rj r-7 5 /I'-J A W’ tv'' . ,. .. ■.. .;. ..• . i ■■' <■ -. •V-' ■ ' 7i»V^-';;-- >v.4-:->r •■■T ■p: -J • ' . •'t..■—a ™ DETAILED REGULATIONS Chapter 29 EXCASMTIONS. FOUNDATIONS AND RETAINING WALLS Scop« Sec. 2f01. This chapter sets forth icquirements for excavation and fills fiw any building or structure and for foundations and retaining structures. is made to Appendix Chapter 70 for requirements governing er.cava* tion. grading and earthwork cwmruction, including fills and eipSankments. Quality and Design Sec. 2902. The quality and design of materials used structurally in excavations, footings and foundations shall conform to the requirements specified in Chapters 23,24,23,26 and 27 of this code. Excavaliens and Fhit Sec. 2903. (a) Gcacral. Excavation or fills for buildings or structures shall be so constructed or protected that they do not endanger life or property. Slopes for permanent fills shall be not steeper than 2 horizontal to I vertical. Cut sl(^ for permanent excavations shall be n« steeper than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical unless substantiating data justifying steeper cut slopes are submitted. Deviation from the foregoing limitations for cut slopes shall be permitted only P***®”****®® of * investigation report acceptable to the building No fill or other surcharge loads shall be placed adjacent to any building or suucture unless such building or structure is capable of withstanding the addi tional loads caused by the fill or surcharge. Existing footings or foundations which may be affected by any excavation shall be underpinned adequately at otherwise protected against settlement and shall be protected against lateral movement. Fills to be used to support the foundations of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of fill, both acceptable to the building official, shall be submitted. (b) Proicctioa of A4|oiniiig Property. The requirements for protection of adjacmt property and depth to which protection is required shall be as defined by prevailing law. Where not tkfined by law, the following shall apply; Any person making or causing an excavation to be made to a depth of 12 feet or less below the grade shall protect the excavation so that the soil of adjoining property will not cave in or settle, but shall not be liable for the expense of underpinning or exteiuling the foundation of buildings on adjoining properties where his excava tion is not in excess of 12 feet in depth. Before commencing the excavation, the <s2901-2M3 ING WALLS land fills for any s. 9verningexcava< rbankments. yin excavations, ified in Chapters tfuctures shall be pcrty, ital to I vertical. 2 hwizontal to I s are submitted, e permitted only i to the building any building or anding the addi* excavation shall nent and shall be structure shall be oil investigation cceptable to the br protection of be as defined by iply: Any person or less below the >roperty will not underpinning or here his excava- : excavation, the EICAV, ■t:- '■-vl r*'’- > ■-I wm/i* .. .fMm 'm'-'-M' 1W:!--yi : ‘Im r »f.A mSB ♦i- * ^ '■■in V . ■ • V/ ■ I - . 'V J;jjV' ^vki j j r ‘ ■ ^<3: ;> :.H "■ '*3 .VV: x'i •A3I1 ::^y UNiFOfttI BUILDiNQ COOC ^SSfinTJ wll!l! '"!r «*■«"? <>>■:ihcc,c,f^r "i,fwi«cc(cd. adjoining buildings sliould ho ...™“- »« eve in Ihc e,„vni„»,«, ih,< ihc •djoinin, «„j „|„ bekn. u« depib of 12 fceiilirpa* '~"'1t "1 buildings Soil -- - r '" ““ 1 ”“"'"’* rmitnph.soil CIOMificttlon —ExptnsIvt Soil ibedrfiS ^rtSsdk^SofT'i "■' P"'P»*» of Ulis chapict. •ceonlint to U.B.C Slindttd ‘”0. ».B shun Be ctarncerniic, of . „il i, «« sod slS??:’SSoeZt Tabkl'' jVcf by U.B.C. StimdiS No ^9 5 Tan^ " greater than 20. as determined event the soil expansion Index varies r/th £h“ *" determined according to Tabic No. 29-D. ^ shall be »*<HWto*H)o mvtstigation Jutzre:;:^tTrdtrb:tz'::;'r:s"^^ 3. Elcvauonofthewatertabie.ifcncountcied. effecS^ SSS "f“« »f «P»"o« soil, «Kl ibe ■ 5. Expected total and differential settlement. S22 iMtii -f:'. m: ‘vpHHIPEe- *vsg^ t .:■ ¥ f /r;, *. -ar.v , ■ ^ J ,^ »,i*v-. , .V* _ ,, «■ ,, .V' ■ .. V •. V,." .k >“>2:• B> S \ -"-I i building code Mify in uniting the I excavation is i»» be )uiiilings should be ^ to the excavation receding 12 feet in adjoining soil w ill djoining buildings The owner of the igs lo a depth of 12 ling paragraph. ses of this chapter. No. 29-B shall Be f a soil are to be Standard No. 29* . Foundations for 20. as determined isideration. In the td index shall be Duilding site shall Jing official may ct licensed by the ;rvation and any vations made in to evaluate soil , compressibiiity y shall be shown The building ition which shall vations. red. including bear- ve soils and the : :'.j iP: -i E fr-* : ' ■ ■'.M .<1 fea--tXadsir...'m '**■' HlWlilf III"mmm ■SSiry- ■- .-• ..P>*-^ I ? ivlk — piil ♦ . • ^V -r \ W «■ .W % •• I* ,i ; 4 **Sa ) Ok V'- ' •*. ^1 <1 b r V -=VV^ i. .:v 4 ¥ • • “88 8 i / / 1 * J 8 mu ?is!sOui *^o W U2:i 5^<to o^><iu2 ouic:UiQ 'Sui-L Emilio -ill"ii§5s iinIsiis »|Iimm miIJfUh*00^* H^UO oil o*a> 5) L^^J. o ^§§ilS (CX >J s ^ o; i“ O o 3 5 fc w mJ «mIu. a. < til □□□□ s V. 1 1-5 2 5 ^ I,•5a L Ifll il 5fto <0 &7i si X X cr o o> uj2 ‘-0 ^Ui (OGC i>^ I .' ; i' r> too UUilua. me o5 (ElOv5a II,tu g .1 S S';-:- •. -il;sw ■ •■•.•KCA.I- m-:- i ;■• •. iWM ¥ 10700 High Plymou PUANNER E: BASE SPECl SIZE: A,Q' ( -•f'^etached ( ( -)^onplete ( ROOF STYLE: ( )Gable Reve Other Side Eave IX" SIDING: Lap(^ Style h-4c m Width /A * Smooth ( Tex Shake ( ) 0th Corners: Wood Batts: X TRIM: «2 Pine Other OVERHEAD DOOR IC, X Flush Fibe Steel ( ) Se Colonial Panel Mitered Corner 2-Year Service Poliev, SERVICE DOOR: » 2/8 (yf 3/0 ( ) WINDOWS: Ranch Othe r Ifel!I'-t Mi°i| 9o^ Ez^oi ►“O Ul .-TiSSSS“-?»sSSgs “^g“i iuig?,.•*■'. s '.t > 3 X X 5^ <O*-0 ^UJ (OCE .* ; i‘-. _i U: <i i.-’ vV- ■rl m:to!afc&-'........'■''"’T— GdAco .g IoIBIS e ^ 10700 Highway 55, Suite 280 Plymouth. MN. 55441 PLANNER ESTIMATE BASE SPECIFICATIONS SIZE? ^0' X * OD ( -f^etached ( ) Attached ( ->^oaplete ( ) Framed ROOF STYLE:^/t Pitch ( )Gable Reverse Gable( ) Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Side Eave IX" End Eave IX SIDING: Lao(^ VerticalC) Style H> 4c ihcl^s.vn; ilrtVvl Width 12 ’ Exposure \Ct/^- « «» •* iJ; I.TI! “ 1 TzZMtK-^^~ z~: -4U. ^-j f i *-f--H-! .,.4—- i— -f-t2 ' « i—^ ^4. t—►t—^ ►- Wt. n.s Smooth (Textured ( ) Shake ( ) Other CUSTOMER:DATE S-5 3 NAME 7Tbv*t Tfbv/> L* i.HOME PHONE APW.*» -f!3S ■_5c._e.Trwvv ftd CITY c (Server Corners: Wood ( ) Metal(>J Batts: X 0.C. Bui 1 dine Permit ( 'i DEMOLITION ITEMS TRIM: «2 Pine Cedar( )| Other OVERHEAD : 1 DOOR SIZE :f IC» x~7 < / Flush (>^ Fiberglass ( ) Steel ( )Sec.Panel( ) Colonial Panel ( ) Other Thickness 17: Styro foam(^ Hollow ( ) Jamb Seal( >5 Hardware Torsion Stretch ( ) Mitered Corners: Yes ( ) No (-5 2-Year Service Yes (-r Policy.No ( ) SERVICE DOOR: Steel i‘ _>_ 2/8 (yf 3/0 ( ) Exist. Garage Exist. Slab Exist. Drive Misc : CONCRETE ITEMS ( •'T’ ^‘4000 Slab 4"Thick ( ^ '-‘4000 Apron - 2 ’ ( -^6x6x10 Wire Mesh ( '1 UBC Footing «4 x«c3 Clean Up/ Remove DebrisTO FRAMING SPECIFICATIONS Treated Plate( ) 2x4(-'TPx6 Studwall __S^^ 2x6 162’ OC Sheathing 'L \t,.,*U. Headers (J) 2x10 2x 12^rT^x4^ all Brace x4 ( )Metal Ridge: 1x6 Other _ _ _ Rafter: 2x4C23i Other:X % tv . 0 Wall Ties:C2Sx 2x8 Ac ( .-^/U-Flll j_o_Avg.In. ( •’i Excavate 21 Yard ( .-)^lock S'Course ( -^Waterproof (O Backfill ( ) Driveway ( ) Walk/Steps Misc:c?oc^ Ptu II e> <i*j C>‘ O f Ro o f i n g : ff jl xs p < >. t<vS‘ *.> Roof Sheathing: ♦Includes 415 Felt 6 9" starter row. ELECTRICAL ITEMS C>OT/jk C-*^ Permit (*0 Trench ( .P^3-Way Circuit G/Fault Disconnect (i) Switches RecentIcles(1) ( X) Floods 0/Hd LlghtsO) 0» ■Other: Automatic Opener _ _ _ _ Transmitters _ _ Dlglal Hpr. Ac I y , I.; V Panel ( ) Other ( ) WINDOWS: RanchC*^) SlipC ) 4 • Other TO BE BUILT TO THE ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SUM OF' $ Cr. H cc-> Finance Plan Mo 0 %$ Mo, OPTIONS: , .___?Ll^Tr»t. e.c Aii_^±S6o " Thank ^u fo^o^the oyvp rtunity of presenting this uld Salesman ■*iaWk v-.'j To: Zoning Dis Total fertlnent < A. which The « for tl B. S( is ex( \ List of Exh ExhibJ Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi Exhibi Review of A The monument the ins] monument] the necei in ligh' unauthor; prevent i Wt. U.S ^ DATE S ZS - ‘iS HOME PHONE CITY C 9-crr\C n Up/ Remove Debris ING SPECIFICATION'S ted Plate( ) 2x4C-iT^*x6 wall __S^ 2x6 IJ:’ OC thlnp Aw > t.'W, ers (i) 2x10 2xl2c:l£lA> Brace ( J^xA ( )MeCal e: 1x6 (C^j ( er: 2x4 r: JL X. »». r> Other __ 1 V- ” OC Ties: Cu^JP 2x8 ^ OC OC in 8 • ff JLxs F** P \ f<v!? v Sheathine: ___________ ludes /as Felt & 9" rter row. ELECTRICAL ITEMS CSOT/jw^ Pernit Trench 3-Vav Circuit G/Fault - - - - - - - - - - - (-^ Disconnect (-^ Switches Recent icle.9( i) Floods O/Hd LightsO ) r: %. natic Opener _ _ _ _ snitters _ _ Digial Hpr IFICATIOMS FOR THE SUM In _ _Mo o _ _%$_ _ _ _Mo« bC > y of presenting this Lid. ___ Salesman 542-9620 M mm ./rv... mm -V' L* tM# tftOel* k*i:i: •1 tm?/# Vi •t. t Si! - .•'Hi-'SiU '~Si£l^sv-vA.;' A •'^:. .•»^-* ' .•.T-' >./.>••.•-: - • ’■•. • •• • ^ .. ys? .-r ■ * Zoning File #1318 August 9, 1988 Page 2 of 2 |rivate driveway nor to the public who use^Fox St the users of the from the travelled roadway. Staff f 5®®! ®® located 34* determine whether the 18 • ^width beLeen f ®^.^?® chief to opening for emergency vehicles such^as 2 flL adequate engine requires a 8*6" cJeara^i^ confirmedhad side mirrors, 10' would h«» » ®**^ance and added that if the vehicles that the 18' width would be an adequate'*width**^*s?*ff***'^^^®^* *** confirmed owner must realize that if the procertv ® concern is that the future, the entrance must be re-dLiq^ed for ®®®®and gate would have to be r#»mov**^ k^®^?"®® ® private road, the pillars minimum 24' width. removed based on the travelled road standard of a residential°property but staff* of lighting on a private directed downward ^and if “ lantfrn"tL»*“''^°" *'*’® lighting Lat be installed, the intensity is to be held dn* °*’®" design is to be Froblem £ro« the public roadwa?. ®'^««te a viewi^ Staff Recommendation - constructed‘”^at® the® reside^ce“located"at 1745“,™ ’“'=® ‘>®following findings: ocated at 1745 Fox Street, based on the users of the public*roadway*nor^of”tho^^*?^® ® potential hazard to the 34' setback tL trave??er^SdwayJ ® driveway because of the v;hicles thafLy°Lvfto^serv?ce “;rproplrty^®®""''® swludel pf^p^rty!"**®""** "e<=«<»«y security m};-m •••■•;. emergency - 4 for this This approval is subject to the following conditions, property is further**developed?°the®18^*wide future time this not satisfy the road design standards for a prlvlt^ro!!/''® open/direct”lighting is*'to®be^installld *’®^‘^^5®®‘®‘’.<^°W"w»rd and if an so as not to crelte a viewi^ nrob?^: ^ ® intensity must be reduced roadway. viewing problem for the users of the public [ !► t m. i- i . m JP8|WI|Riy*’WWi"^.kR-l -.w.' '» - CITY OP OROl Initial App ($50.00 p' Renewal Var (no chang After-the-F PROPERTY LO Site Addres Property Id Please chec Attach lege required su DBSCRIPTlOl Descrd c-\n • VARIANCES 1 Setba< Other K 10m*-■‘ is to the users of the - as it is located 34* »e local fire chief to .ers meets the adequate Mr. Perry confirmed that if the vehicles equired. He confirmed 8 concern is that the at some time in the ate road, the pillars led road standard of a 9hting on a private t the lighting must be amp design is to be t to create a viewing ■or the gate to be :reet, based on the ►tentlal hazard to the Iveway because of the ranee for emergency security for this ons: e future time this nee of the gate will e road. 5d downward and if an isity must be reduced isers of the public PROPERTY LOCATIOH Site Address H: ^'• <r\1336^ / ! • ' .1 CITY OP ORONO - VARIWiCE APPLICATI^n-*. Initial Application Fee $150 ($50.00 per each additional Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) -o T U 4 t f W.' fc MUfW • - . , »» — r-1 M»t. « .. . .• /. • * • . . . , . t f ^ t J. I ' V \ 1/ ! 1 f . * V ,r- ,V‘ A u.* I. t V V i t W U^t\ ^ r • I r t J W H ■ » t \» Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or / VT ; I ‘Z»-7 M •r./#:^2 0.-j,nl ru%^ 2 ^ . t? ; . **' f • i f^ v«. W‘Jil wv V « I' - A iil torrens?- •V Attach legal description to application if not included on APPLICANT Name ■' ' ' * ’ ' '*■ Phone (home) ^ <^ 5 — 3 ^ Phone (work) "^35 CyJ'l 7- „ Add re s s:^4 .Citv: Zip:,^^5^ /_ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) » Phone (work) Address:Citv: __ Zips - -- Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property CResidential^ other (specify) - - l n\ ■ "V-V-- V /-I :'H D^CRIPTIOH OF RBQ Describe request in detail: c ^ O i \A^ AO c^'Cx'^P UUcce^1 I VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ..I Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) h-. ■■r M ~.r -t'-" REQUIR 1. C 2. 3. 8. The Ap rememb informe Certifl Zoning APPLICA The ap request unusual the in; knowled Applica OWNERS The own author! agents, tion an< Owner's Applica; Plannini third M review i unable authoris Office < : ■ _.•■ .V.i . • ■ .'■• ■ ,. 1,-v->'.Vy/; -, ■; .■ : . :. w--.;m■-jWy^'-2JBC1 ;v -’.i r; • :.K •=v.=: ^ k. i'i-n v t. - f. • • * I. < t*' y .• **• Mi u i.*; f ^i.*u ■l A ' Y-r,r,r, j; •• w»w'iL • ’ W'V V* ir.% aA JL u.‘ V » i* i' u ' L.i,f^ ’• ^ r* »*"IT*^ v\' » t'V '■ ' J';< * 6." if^ “ • ■'^;VA rt't/ ;-.v i -•7/ •* v/: u. • / iV*.’ orki ^75~ cy54 2-. Zips 3^ I rork)Pi Zip: _ (month/year) : land. ' :4 ■' I .r. 'H. V;:; C^^sidential fy) ion Cost $ "7<^00»o0 cj,.!rvsr^ L.uc<.,.cf ■li ' ■• ::< ■•• ^ ;V:,v;i mm rdcover : . fev ■ ^ Rear) 4 S.-*“r :'P *. -s ■-("-es.♦■,|»t- ^ •'.u/f-.? . .=v.,.' • •> ,J-‘ ■.-- •i'J '‘7^. HARDSHIP a;;Lc.°^„r;r •»»-- DESCRIPTION OP DNOSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: ^ 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain 797?^ Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. this application. Please not complete if the above Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ Date or APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required ... requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge • Applicant's Signature Date OHNERS SIGNATURE hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commxssion members, and Council members for purposes of investiaa- tion and verification of this request. ® Signature - - -- - - - - - - Date submittals into the City offices 25 days before the 4>h-i*>/4 ^mmission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is ®. ® attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an Office^of^*-^^-*'-»----^*^^ your place and to advise the Building & Zoningthis change prior to the meeting. ..m.. -^v mm 7 ■i^A a Z !i, s&essam A MM :y resulting from strict C IJ X \ W j compliance with Zoning Ln 150* (you must obtain nance A-603 Govt Center dressed to each of the ss (use address labels ilations as required, nations) if any changes :ach a separate )lication. aff. list of application. Please complete if the above lication is complete. Date formation required or > pay all fees and/or ion, and certifies that > the best of his/her Date ^plication and further ty staff, consultants, purposes of investiga- Date 'z/^2./£'P. ices 25 days before the tetings are held on the isent at all scheduled LI. If an applicant is irrangements to have an the Building & Zoning :-iK"*v I-'? K. '1%, w.y ■•••> ' • • ■»* f <5. ili - rr-’-A ■::*•K'r-y- • lil o <» a S Assp s ;s«s 2 M W BO M 8 «• 3 OMU^is^sS•HI 9i ^ 3 I M 2 S SoS8«* S S ^ 8 H H 8 { OC ft ^ T ■» ?;^i8s !:Ss8S ^SxxoS •J ** 55S,. M M S O (A M « O W lU M M M OL I •H u» f#| T 5 < ^ j{ 8e88§‘ O M M 2 10 SSS88& r-m:-I ff 8<xsS 8S M M 3 ^ ^ t? t*^ t > > i»» «» Ullh T «A m 3 < M lU lU U. H **S52«*J5< 5 Cyl >;^sssss tt <c 8 fc S 5gilM I PI 8ShI§I o u u ^P O V;- ^T4X«fc-. .= . M M 8 8 S'"S ^§11^2 7 ooS< >• >• a. H lA ^ ^ ^8S3383 guio. -«S5 8 *8w“*§ 8§33;I o ill O ^ li* e p M 88« .axbbI*** M S M M O P33z2 7 cr B< 8 o o Q 8 ^ 88 ^ o ■iff'#*' Pi- - 'Vs ' - -i; ■• m : ■-^ •.■'*1 •‘.V-W* ’M li??.-, ■«v. . ■M A ■■ «■''A V.1 1 >« '»^r 8 10 K mi M < J tt . ^ N Ul «i 2 •H 2-1 -8^a 8So3 s g s eo B fieX i»B 9 Ul lU lA S! M 1 2 1^11 O s<ss 2 & X u 3 llil j:- .IS. r ■ t m. '■':l rf/i I i ■ ■ ■• - •■ :.: ■. V= . .-i ■• . ■-JiaiilP • * * * i ♦ f •r -#^4 !9 ____ t*' ^1 .1^ i • . y / A^’.r i •' *#■ l' ■• # ■> .y ./ •*» .>• ?: • . <• e»’ ,/ V •/09 /> ;■ i' U^U ^ >w .y ' A ‘ • IfB > / I * «. • «* • • __________. :a ’ If ^V/r* ov 4>5J I .0 4^ #reT GHOUNO ^ • AERlAu PHCTO-l^hO Mo\ "5' «• \ LAKE MOTO- 1^5*0) i m :ms h •. ^ p ■F'a H: iSH "A it ft ** 3 'ff:'” ~T •«i___iL., ■: OV (^f) *■ ^ • i •! t • 1 ■*’v " ^ ^ »'.. rv'« ■' ■..?:V: J-j:v<> ,'•■:■•?A -*■; < 7 1/2’8’ ew •w ' < '■ ■> 4 \ FVy iP'l i-Si ^;- y: •V'>:•r "m :■ V:‘-'»r« . - A?3^'■’A Wt^T.;'-- . ’>.'f^-.Si, ’»?i-v>fC i PP » ..^7 ;v ■ i’ 1 .? •I :u’. if ! C«*i't if i«Mt I' of r»ui Vi^y for Ano«; Abiikli.uli in the SW 1/4 of the SK 1/4 of See.3-117-23 Itcnnopin County» Minnesota #13• 4iJ^4 Sfret^ —£d^e oT MhekAt^ ...... ||5.0 £jw *s///?4 p///(3^* "bc^% >»c’5>7 l!nt o-ffai»t ei " * ’ 5 W V c-^r*.‘:c. i T 1'.i"r«*by eertify tlint thi?* is r» fr::-' nncj eorrect rt'|jres<*nt.at i on <»f a survey of tlie location of two exiritin^j pillar base?; in relation to the North and West linos of the llasl iialf of tlr.* :Uvjti^.w«ist njart**! <jI the Snut!i<'*ast O'.inrt-or of 3, Township 117 North# Han<ie 23 West of the ^ilh Princif*«»l M< iidian. M iloes ma }.airf)ort lo show .my califi iii;pruViMnenls or encro.ichaii/nts • COFFIN k GRONBFUG, INC. S»M !• *: iMt.c : 1 : i:ei5 •' jn i«•« *t .^11 V .: I # I •» . - <M ^ ■. rfit;:.. •• I :■•.*•:. !i.' ■ I.. I I I; I ■ r ••. . I. I III I ‘HI •■ •■ V I >1 » t:;o. 1.?V;''. I* t I n Ml * I mm • .' •*! • • ■ ■. Vr;- mr.'i mm til ‘■m \ I Tot Dates Subject Applic ne Zoning List of ^rtinei 1. 2. 3. The wou; suf 1 driv 6.Thij prop any ■ •. •• :%:i mmmMm&1318 ifvm\ cf iJtKk^p ««\ V • g ••.^ Hdrth fiM. of^Ji 4 »fS4.t.3'ln^i\ ^ . vM-'. t:ion of a Lon to tho M' of tho West of tlio i i r.iprovomcnt:] J4C. 9 t * \ir. ?:o. l.?7:or. r V<*1 • , I* * irifi* ‘I ^•, hW; gPrr Wv«- mjm h'-<Py 4 U ■::<i•'1, ^4.: r.;?’ ^.4^/ •*.!-^ ,rT-Tr7*' •.• --:\r ... .'i$|:%-i*(H.-'J■ IfftTi- I —"I a«tT mT0if M • •'*. -*.. • '■ Tos Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson ^dii: Itetei Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning a Zoning Administrator July 28, 1988 Subject: #1319 Karen Fuller, 4055 Elm Street - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing ^"“net^ioJJe: ''«i«nces to lot area and width for construction of a toning District - lr-ib, single family, l acre, sewered mmmmfe .. i H - liist of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Psrtineut Facts - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Detail From City Files Ma^o^llw:” ltub"^^c:?!on"°"“ Neighborhood Documentation From 1980 and 1978 Variance Approvals 1. Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f 140' Existing 19,920 s.f. (46%) 118* 2. Variance 23,640 s.f. (54»> 22' (16%) 3. The property is served by municipal sewer hm,, one sewer unit on the three lots U/3 uniVper parLl®!" “®®essed for 51 A culv\rt foul ’d ^be’requir'eVa^ona^Elm*^ ditch along Elm Street, constructed. required along Elm Street when the driveway is 4. 5. 35' front^®^o ““rea°r?Md^?^^^ me?."°™"^ setbacks of woulWf:^ 3^% h°ardMvtr maximum'^'’o°; ^ dr\“iwayrdeckre\V.“"" “ residence w\\h ''norm's"l" 6. proper?LT"N^ o\Lrrind “is^®vai"lablrfo ‘;-° developedany larger. available for purchase to make this lot m .• ■....? m 'i?'m ,i i'-Ti Si V*X '.ji« Zoning F July 28, Page 2 c Discuss! Thi in 1978 neighbor appropri of the 1 that the issued. Staff Re Bas informal followin V ■ - w ’■M if^-.'?=. --.i^ . , .. . , ....... , . . r^* .'*f^’ • **.-^^”''‘r^'‘iW)t>^' • ' F Administrator i. •’ ;.:v. h for construction of a red ;:•) :• ••W- iighborhood riance Approvals Variance 23,640 s.f. (54%) 22' (16%) has been assessed for jarcel). Itch along Elm Street, when the driveway is ■ '-■A the normal setbacks of met. :e setback zone, which f. This is more than ence with the normal •ghboring developed base to make this lot ■ : •: mM . I / •i.r 1 w ■'mi ■0kJ0]4^:.. ■; ‘:./.• . ' .-44^.''fcjtdfc. »♦ Zoning File #1319 July 28, 1988 Page 2 of 2 Discussion ~ This 0.46 acre lot was originally granted a variance for buildability in 1978 and renewed in 1980. Previous variance reviews addressed the neighborhood drainage concern, which lead to the approval condition that an appropriately sized and constructed culvert be installed per the directives of the Public Works Director. Additionally, previous approvals required that the three individual lots be combined before a building permit can be issued, and that all setbacks be met. Staff Re<lati< Based on a current site inspection of the property revealing no new information or concerns, staff would recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Driveway culvert size and location must be reviewed and approved by Public Works Director prior to Installation. 2. The 3 lots must be legally combined prior to issuance of building permit. ♦ 3. Normal LR-IB setback requirements shall be met. 4. Hardcover on the property shall not exceed 5,976 s.f. (30%). t mm ':i:n ••ft..:; mm^mm Wtill Mm •'■mm j .■>* ■ 1 f V. ..J P mm CITf 0 Initia ($50 Renews (no After- PROPSIt Site A Proper plus 06 Please Attach r??quir' ince for bulldability views addressed the /al condition that an ed per the directives s approvals required lilding permit can be rty revealing no new oval subject to the eviev/ed and approved issuance of building u • J76 s.f. (30%). Jr- -■' .ita .11 : i ;r-' .-s. ..j .4 im -1 ..*■ < ?sr: ^ f r‘V \0' |b...It 0^'-nr !???;•.’«•5s?*.•m 4*^ CITir of OROiid - variaiicb applicat IS5vM ' / > / / ) Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional varl Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original applica^^^T- After-the-Fact Fees (Double application ^e) 2t«#pm mm i •' W PROPERTY LOCATIOH Site Address_ _ _ r • - : •. ri^rI j. • V- • V*. I. * i i VU Lots # 7. # 8, and 0 9 '••V. Slock 9 * -'w ■- fc, V v 'v V V' Av rr^i I M'.:mm:: ». .t Vi. ? t 1.' • V V •» ^ .-i. • ... • V .*r* f i. U A I I f • * l,.‘tU*Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 06-1 17-23-41 0081 v,, —~ ~ '■ ■ ' ■"■■■—" ' —- wvv-4 ^Please chec^^one -^Iro^erly^^" ^ ^ ^afestrac^^?>1 torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included oh required survey. APPLICANT Name Karen Lynn Fuller Phone (home) 533-5597 or 536.nfi4A _ _ Phone (work) 922-3825_ _ _ _ Address; 4749 Welcome Ave. North City; Minneapolis Zip: 55429 OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:. City;Zip; Date Property Acquired March 18, 1983 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcel^ of land. PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY %1 £a< V. : Present Zoning District Present Use of Property non residential Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in Aet&ili^ .’.- I' VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Are.!y^ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width s Front _ _ Hardcover Side _ _ _ Rear) /‘•'•I cw mi''' i t rt irr:fe:#* ■■?>■»;, I <,6il RBQUIB 1. C 3. The Ap rememb inform< Certifj Zoning APPLia The ap reques unusual the in knowled Applica OWNERS The owr authori agents, tion an Owner * s Applica Plannin third M review i unable authoris Office < *-U Ml 4 mmmma^b, p- f ^r/i': ^K Li' !i’.. ; • *!• 1. J. • ‘*- ’ ». *^w rrl- f -■ ’ t ' U. I J: L-* I ; T-* • t -■:* r :r*r*-r : * - w V \. VW « • Z't • • 'y ■. ■ •••.: .'ri rri^j i.' J. Vi, ! f i'o.OO • • t rnim m « • / I 4 ,'i*.' u* « V V ' «N. . *1 •. . .• u i. j f. • Uil t • ■„• ■• •.. h t ! rt\* V.V i * L.'U rr-/» . v/jf r/w J V*L w'vJ V : ■■■i i' » / A, *-/ L •• •'■••»>•; on 3-5597 or 536-oa4fi 922-3825 141 r,r. . Zip: 55429 ,.. .nf- t^'-' :k i-tr k.,« _Zip: >nth/year) Residential lIlMa &5K'" /: St $ !7^ 'r.' Rear) ^V V •■«■""'--A:*- - . ...,^ S? ■ ---a.;. V ., tr m:.•.•••• .V I HARDSHIP enforc^enfol difficulty resulting from strict pW: I'’’A'.;- ■ ISfA'-AA m'tM DESCRIPTION OP UNUSOAL PROPSIinr<.COWlTIONS ” clde"RMuirementBr°'’®'^*'^ conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Vv>iSfc- 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form ^hfc^i^e^ Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain 348-3271?/ Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center Stamped, lc9al sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of ¥h» raVne°d" ^ .u^e^ /d°dr\%t 1^^:?^ Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as reauiredMsr, Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). application, please attach a separate list of 1 notified of this application^mm-w _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is information has not been included. this application. Please not complete if the above . ;.1H Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is c^pieteT Zoning Official’s Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE “ reaues'teV°hv\h'l®'7®‘'^- provide all information required or lTrtn\:rT.Tol sro^"fed/ir^®“ app!La\°lo"n?and“ce?u"lies"t?::tknowledge? supplie^y true ^d^correct to the best of his/her :a.. ■ 1 ^ -Cf ;V •? IkM'-. t' Applicant's Signature / Date I OWHSRS SIGNATURE • , ^ and agrees to this applii4ti6n and further ?iiri;d'^v™i|!ca?iSro^ir requ^^ ^ mSrs'’for" purpotll' or"nvi??iga- Owner's Signature Date. he^i“on the authorized aaent at-f-^>nfi in ^ "'®«^^ting, please malce arrangements to have an Office of thircht^grprior^t^th ® ‘ Zoning-y t' yji. i:o rne meeting.■eI .. LUSAfcvi^' ' ^4-W- • .._ Y ri: "\-k .Ai r ' L' .1 \'\- II s PEA b -y :: \ \ k ''1 >.—r?— /' "k ^IJ-’_it A-i i 3 » M '' if” o > « -#■ - * • ■. « »« « ^€^U^ic€tie cf For: ELEANOR MATCHETTE C. t; WIN0CM'& ASSOCIATCS. INC lANO SUtVIVOtS r«| «49‘3i4« 1311 EUSTIS ST., $r. MUt; MINN. 99I09 •■ /r-.'-to Elm 1^.5 ^caW: \'* L 0 OCnoVes \ron ?\oct(f • DenciVcS Iren FouT^<i • • A w ^ V .V ' ^\V \20 0 Pla^ UE.13 Meai Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 9, Minnetonka Summit Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota we HCKiey ceRTiev that this is a true and correct representation op a survey op the ^NOARIES OP THE lANO AlOVE OESCRIIED AND OP THE lOCATlON OP All lUilOiNGS. IP ANY, THEREON, AND All VI$||lE ENCROACHMENTS. IP ANY. PROM OR ON SAID lANO. Oot«d ,doy iit <J Li nF a n I?7^ **R. * ASSOCIATES. ^ INC. Swrv«yor, MiAn«M(« R»tiMrotl«n Me. 2G \ $Vory . ,Mouse (OCIATES, INC l4S*St4« MINN. SSIOt >caW: \ • V. \ror» ?\0C6(i Iron Fovmci r;; / CK A-- \p Hi >■ 1/ ^ :'fm ■?(. > ’• . .* 1 •. •. ■m■T:I'*--':. J,v Wv. 1^ i •’ w l^<a, ^.■L.'••••••'•>•■ uaouacaa f 1^ I* HBL iVP.^^'. V-\ yT A* ' . ... •iSi4 ir. - I ■ ^ "As.\W; ■ .• /, ■.■>•y';fM •». - - .^-^1— ':tmw- i r I jr ij' '»^ ~^iV, ♦ ■ fSJ ' j mf <t a ->4) ' • '.:>fj •• :rr.“< I Mm r ( i .\ T- f f \ • JFijjJr, pT'-“ .1- . ^^•f. V> - I • ."‘i^v r.".-; »rj- M/^ll Fif mm 4l»0 £ok 4eM Sw*4*.CTLe-r 7**- . »K .. •*‘;*‘t* /.r - k . >f f ^ f S0(^ ^oa Y Ooo Y 600 Y oaa Y ^^1 TPay rj ■if/1-1 iMii -‘ ■ '-'5 Vi ■■:i4 •- ■%1:S.-.-' ',■■■;•■• j*. :; '■.si-i ::fsi i- • ! I X mm *1* • •• ■ • • Ri A.‘- ...... im '■•^ ’’it i'^%r:£- . '-i VW]^ '■ > •mm•:m-y ’'iWtfsV : ► f ^ ':S ’ :: 'f ' ■ r fc ’ - .'■^■sii ii^l;-i >1 . .M'i • V . \ m • ^ O ••i•-• •• • •,. f I /I.I immm m - '■ ■ ■ • v: r fi-:M mm im -•> '■=« -3m fSiS m ii ^mm ilisi rl b, ^ 1 ^ m -w^u ■“’I A r.v ’ _ 4P j' f.It.iTu 4.; - ’•b^ A •' ♦ m , S * i ^>\ r>. I hmw g- ■■■'.■'.?^f4 - - - _ ^i . ^ r J^liv v> Vj Sil' Wl r j^Kwir.>' ^ i mTC M m-mmm. 'sgnuf-'mM ii#* g- ~—^ A-■..!..- \ ^ t ^4ri :^t2SBaBSF * t^‘3''■¥W- >1^-;'••••• ,<f sv .' ..-J- *■. -. ’‘•- ..■••■. :'ri -■V-k .>•: ■> 1% S •1^ Li f If %■L; f! Th« Har approva Puller* the nex In forma -"'i 4- - ■> pmMl:'- Council Jeanno Mabusth* Zoning Administrator June 26, 198Qi SUBJECTt #562 Mark J. Fuller, 4055 Elm Street Lot Area and Lot Width Variance Mark Fuller variance application is the exact same application approved by the Coum 11 in the summer of 1978 (#401 George Hatchett). Fuller, grandson of the Matchetts, plans to begin construction within the next year. Please review the Minutes of June 9, 1980 for background information and recommendaticn. K: » t.^eu. * r y • * ^ a • wm • m •••. re. .. V 00 <^4 u< ; ■tv. •w ^ e• e 1. v-l •, # • •> • I • r* . Wt HI »OUN( i5c/n . *: • a. 562 me application George Hatchett), instruction within 1980 for iMckground Vi m f. y, m./’k > •• *^rj ■■H ■ V. f --r- J-E^g-V rerfiaiiyriieirfV ^'.c' A.,d' ^' I'.'ii^t •c r SFu^veu.vAvcHKrri:C r WINOfN & ASSOCUTCi. INCiANO ^UI>|TCa\ T«i t4S S«4«0«t luiiis ii., SI. 'Au;, ««»»**^ ssios#401 • •• tL ST,Rrc>. ~'CS >'asA®, »/„ Sa a. • •• ..] \ V- * 0 Of rioVt5* yy^«?g g I - , o V»• a’ • f ■V.vtSTW5 ? ) ^Vsry Fftme ■ ’ < ■'A \ if- *< . . . . . V7ft ^ • J.M0.0 P)aV: .uB.-i'i wseoC J5J t'.’Kfc- ; ^ Haa« *p •t. “. » • • 7, 8 and 9# .block 9, Minnetonka Sumit Park. Heimepin County, Minnesota !"•• ^ V. - ^ • . * *' V ... • . ,4S7aA^ \ .• •.!>- * 4>‘* » ^ *•-. .'.ii^p’' . .. wt Hftitv citrirr that this rs a tiui and coaiicr icmsiNTAiiON Of a suivif o» tni SOUNOAlifS OT THI lANO AlOve OfSCtllfO. AND Of TMC tOCATlOM Of AU lUllOINCl. IP ANT. THfKON. AMO Ml VlSitlf CNCIOACMMfNTS. IP ANY. TtOM OS ON SAlO lAMO. ** •■». ’■. ,AO. I»16>4my •!June c a* wiMOfN a ASsociAvia^ INC. '50/l4 ' '"• '■ :{'• Nfc lllfi f'-Aa'*. :• i .n r ;:♦ • V*; v;; . ; V ■ ».7'4-4r» ‘ 4| f • > '* .. I . * /- *■ f ® V I • • ^ * - 'fMi7' ‘ ' ' ik ► ^ -(1.V5v.‘ • ■.;t .} jTir -JiLSSOCIATES, INCi •4S*S»4« lUl, SSlOt^^UujtsL-01 • * V i^i wm- •• %iS f V SV«ry Frttine • •* Moust iUUu U''-• \u1 *F f A $UtVlT O* tHt i mUOINCI. IP ANT. AMO. IIS. ^ INC. A ^ '&A ‘i-. Ji S s < • > ; *j 4^ ** ^ 4v:f ■ ' ■Siti..; -i'» VARIANCES REOll H DEN'S m h^. v^-n' "4 V 1 SI^.TBACKS ■ti»«t frt»K«i HARTCOVER jf«. - K rt. iM OTHER SECTIONS j •«ll«Ui* Batflht laM.I NuAlaf IMm.I LAND •IVUtCSi pu% _ AVAIIMIUrft •i>or«fit JaiHMry I, |ficl«4««t kfWV •ff^rtiiif •^lli lm% •la«/«>io, ACrCMi , „ mm VTSLITlISf City •»«•? ^ « l«t !• varaiit DrtfTtve IAJ9 Vtft rawyip^ MIMftAL affactA pn\. STRUCTURES rffittiK »0iiJDliNi»____4a OafIrlaariaat __— aaorocAJi nraii ____aNtir# ___ ravlaa _____f^\mm rawvAL atll 4 ^ddUt<A 1:0 1+ a to •>#C\! t•rtf • • M ■11 Ib:;=:. ft Ifi ' '■ l|:y VARIANCES IKOUIRKD DEKS1T^ pii«|i^^ p9j^jip£^ y3.«^v IvNND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY /.nning strict hrrvhi.%'4»tikwrr .^uf. ...i»'. /*-« rtM mmcjw SETBACKS 9kf^\0tna>tytiTtm \*4« letter _________________ ^ __3 __ HARTCOVER • - 9% r%. rrt-:rru5 hjkfCKVf^ruk «.f.____ OUTI^C HAJtncuviJi Mr>#meD MAADteVUI ••f.______Ji ii.^n M.Wf M.m »I.MI M.m OTHER SECTIONS KCQvtji!3t mm%l4im9 Mtfikt Imb.I - tSUTIim_______ MoHmiSl LAND •tvutcBt _*r•/ >t*M^ J&mumry 1, If7$ CW^rtht^ ____ rn^^hinpi «»ltK •III#? fifrcfli fi#l III tllli frptifitli |MCl94*#t IHfK l#iT#l Kills fOMKWr •ffsrtlAf s^llMtlMi _ w«v«Msl at ftHApa ^ m#iu»ws1 KallSIaf larsIlM Wt •tss/sKApat raasfstaat _ |9»roa«l•laat «»it|| aslfM^tiws 4#»«lop^at - — ••• - _ 1^ rltr __ rauat)r/*t»ia ^ ^ ^Ivsta VTSLirmt city mmmmw ____rana»rt«4r City _ svtIUMs ___ rtmaarlaC ••rtlc sytt^-------a#v yrafirsaC ----------#«itlU«s rofifcr^Ui^______ talttlfif •shttsadtrtf ••UtlHf KCfi-fVlirsfiiliiy LAND USE ii^jset Ivt oiYitiivc lAtm tifft SSOPSiSl sfracta vtrsiit ^ orrMfkl *4 WMiaC •ofilfif aaa 4i«trlrti roafaralpif ..Ji^ y#l»«tlysl____•rr^ttory KvlI4ifis ••• ^ rea41tlMS| «••aefi-rofifemUif ••• STRUCTURES nitrw stMVDtw» OafIrlaarlatt ssaroiKL nrfti _ ^ 4o aat »|i»v vltli •naln^ r^ftofiMara -- aMtlr^ly Cfif KalMift^ ar m«# ____ rai^iaa •• imt KalMlas at a»a faa«t ••e»»4t %tfm ffivi _ _•• at •■l•f|af frMt !••• IKaa %0« ClfV| ____ IN^tlas KsIMlas paASCTT Vianr (y?| ^ | atll alll aat fa4«ra »m •*i«tla«| ytr4 4|aaa«laa • r» r* •• •• r»*% 1.1 ‘I ' ^ I •1 • :*; ■I -*■ ?’■ J I"- *>•-1 ’ '1- ’TV. -MIMUTBS or A PLANHING COMMISSIOH ffiETINC HELD ON JUNE 9, 1980 - PACT S Hark Puller Mrs. George Hatchett, o«mer and ’ grandmother of the applicant, were present. The application ia a renewal of a lot area and lot approved in the summerof 1978. The drainage ditch running along Elm StrMt in front of property was reviewed and applicant was again advised that the Public Works Coordinator snist determine size of culvert for driveway to proposed house. i/mmark PULUER 8055 Blr. Street VARIANCE (8582) Jabtour moved to approve the lot width and arua variance of Mark Puller based on the hardship that there is no adjacent land available and subject to the following conditions: Lota 7, 8 and 9 must be combined as one building d uC a setback of the zoningoictrict LR-*lBa P^lic works Coordinator to determine culvert size for proposed driveway. Itotion seconded by Prahm. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. ^ ' information provided by applicant. A Public information Meeting has been scheduled for June 23, 1980. Mr. Cloutier was present. Mabusth reviewed the application. The variance was required tor a propos^ 3* deck addition to be constructed along the conditional use permit. A CUP is guest apartment uae and the intensification of a non-conforming use . The intensification results froi. quest apartment request and pressed screened porch to be constructed on second level. E. T. HERTZ 1820 POX Street SUBDIVISION work Session (#557) CORTLEN CLOUTIER 2480 Casco Point Road CONDITIONAL USE PB VARIANCE Work Session (#555) KT P)jbicct to t 1. Applic.in followin .^1 b) loc.l (r • Oi only ho! ’ l»iiI » tlr ivx j.,irk Cc."'bine I 3. All inpr< 1 ij.ii lc*d I 4. Condilior only. Council PootJ Discussion ir problems, t'nc Paurus moved, of Robert l> C for a conditi address the a concerning tY densely pooul ments. Motlc Jeanne Mabust the record th Street, for a which states: The Mark Full of a lot area summer of 197 Elm Street in and the appli Works Coordin driveway to p At their June the Planning area variance that there is to the follow • 'T-:t'.c?AK !:‘.KT»Nc; or IHH f-r* r;o ooi'nvii.. .m nk 30, r*h0Fubjoct to the fcnovil.g .•. -.'Ht ions : 1 A-'pl iennt to schoit a site plv^n f1' siijn.il ing the following nhypicol ir,nrov^.|:.?nts: *tl loc.^tion, F-.*th •''Vs <-»nd si/o of physical pl.«nt (f o.-rhe*: «c 48 ’ X ^2.5*.- 20* >: *B* hc,id liour.ei b) only one curb cut to ho .iPowcd for oxt>.<mlod ho!* use (two oxist serving rosinence nnd b ii . irra) . c) driveways and off-«»».i r et p.f V. inu area (three parking i-racr s) . 2. Ccr'bine four s.*parato tax tarjels. 3, All 3nproveriont 5 involving moenhoupc operation liioited Lo the -.h^vc i> f• • • nood site plan. 4. Conditional use perfa^t granted to the Mortensons only. Council .Veeting - .’une 30, 1980 Discussion included ♦he ar'ount of n,-»los, traffic probl'jrns. end future use of the prop' rtv. Paurus moved, Hurr seconded, to table the re«5viest of Robert 4 Joanne Mortenson, 1205 7«rbor Street, for a conditional use permit and reqiiest staff to address the adverse effects of this application concerning the potential traffic prcblem in a densely pooulated area in excess of zoning require ments. Motion, Ay'^s (4) - Nays (0). Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator, entered into the record the request of Mark Fuller, 4055 Elm Street, for a variance, dated June 26, 1980, which states: The Mark Puller variance application is a renewal of a lot area and lot width variance approved in the summer of 1978. The drainage ditch running along Elm Street in front of the property was reviewed and the applicant was again advised that the Public Works Coordinator must determine size of culvert for driveway to proposed house. At their June 9, 1980 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission approved the lot width and area variance for Mark Fuller based on the hardship ".hat there is no adjacent land available and subject to the following conditions: « 2. All dial 3. Pub] sixfl Paurus rr request Planning Mbtion, Jeanne M record t: for a V4 Zoning D: 1. Side RequJ Propc Varia Hard! The Dales on the re 4' from t. like to o west edge side prop< an encroat variance, the «rest < not receil appearance Council Me Butler mov draft a re of Alan Da porch neve house, to that the d south. No ilii W TCT ^',1‘RLtJULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 30, 1980«1. Lots 7, 8# * 9 must be ccmbincd as one building site.2. All construction to meet setback of the zoning district LR-IB. 3. Public Wo**ks Coordinator to determine culvert siike for proposed driveway. Council Meeting - June 30, 1980 Paurus moved, Butler s«>conded, to approve the variance request of Mark Fuller, 4055 Elm Street, per the Planning Consnission recommendations of June 9, 1980. Mbtion, Ayes (4! - Nays (0). Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator, entered into the record the request of Alan Dale, 2690 Pheasant Road# for a variance, dated June 24, 1980, which states: Zoning District - LR-IB 1. Side yard vrriance: Required: 10* Proposed: V Variance: 3* » 30% 2. Hardships: a) no adjacent land availa..le b) house location on lot The Dales have recently constructed a deck 28* X 20* on the rear of their home at first flcor level extending 4* from their neighbor's property line. They would like to construct a 16' X 16 * screened porch over the west edge of the deck that will extend 7* from the side property line. The screened porch is considered an encroachment (31.433) and will require a setback variance, we have been advised that the neighbor to the %rest does not oppose the application. We have not received written comments nor did he make an appearance at the action meeting. Council Meeting - June 30, 1980 Butler moved, Hurr seconded, to request staff to draft a resolution approving the variance request. of Alan Dale, 2690 Pheasant Road, subject to the porch never being enclosed and made a part of the house, to be entered into the chain of title, and that the drainage from the roof be directed to the south. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Page 22VARIANCE4055 Elm Street(Continued) VARIANCE 2690 Pheasant Road • 565 Alan Dale X- " 7. 'T'^^c^—.'-y.'tiK-+.If - t":■ ,fiM*ii ja .. 'mmmPlanning Comnisaion and Council Alan P. Olson, Village Planner Jtme 21, 1978 #401 SUBJECT: Variance - George Hatchett 4055 Elm Street The applicant wishes to construct a new home on an existing vseant lot. The property consists of three separate parcels totaling 19,920 sq. ft. (.457 acre). There Is no additional land available as the adjacent parcels are occupied. The house location Is not Indicated but It would have to conform to all regular setbacks. There Is one sever unit assessment on the three lots (1/3 unit per parcel). Variance 34.452 lot area and lot width. Area required:43,560 sq. ft Actual area:19,920 sq. ft Variance:23,640 sq. ft Width required:140 ft. Actual width:118 ft. Variance:22 ft. - 16X 54X Hardship: no additional land available. PLANNING OONHISSION - June 26, 1978 No applicant present. Staff read Into the record a consent from Brad Hays, 4100 Elm Street, wherein he objected to the variance saying he did .tot think any hardships could be demonstrated. Questions were raised concerning lot drainage. Planning Conslsslon tabled application pending review of drainage and requesting applicant to be present to address conslsslon. Staff Note - June 28, 1978 Site Inspection for drainage. There Is a large ditch existing on public right of way along Elm Street which ditch Is maintained by the City. The ditch flows west to the platted undeveloped rl^t of «ray of Park Avenue where It turns to flow southwesterly. This flow Is off the subject property. Development on this lot would require crossing of the ditch with a culvert acceptable to the public works department. Also, construction procedures must be such as to prevent slltratlon or clogging of the ditch at all times. June 28, George > 4055 Ell Page 2 The foil Subject 601 Ntka 615 Ntka 594 Park 4100 Elm 4060 Elm 4030 Elm PLANNING Recoomenc the nelgl' subject t approval •• vv; »S;-• .•» V.4v„-*;June 28, 1978 George Metehett A055 Elm Street Page 2 j§^401 The following table compares adjacent properties: Subject Lot: 601 Htka. Highlands: 615 Htka. Highlands: 59A Park Lane; 4100 Elm Street: 4060 Elm Street: 4030 Elm Street: 19,920 aq. ft. 19,500 sq. ft. »q »q •qsq. sq. 17,5 12, 24,7 15. 35, I »:• »• I ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. Varianee approved 5-10-76 Variance approved 6-24-75 PIANHIHG OOKUSSION - July 10, 1978 Recomsended approval of variances finding proposal consistcat wlA the neighborhood and a hardship of no additional l^d available, subject to no setback variances, to legal lot eo^inatlon and to approval of driveway and culvert by the City Public Works Supervisor Mm TO:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson PROM: DATE: Michael p. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator August 12, 1988 SUBJECT: #1320 Dr. and Mrs. Robert Brandenburg, 719 Minnetonka Highland Lane - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lB List o£ Exhibit Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Application Plat Map Property Owners List Neighbor Acknowledgement Form Applicant's Hardcover Calculations Annotated Exhibit F - by Staff Survey, Site Plan, and Existing and Proposed Plans Pertinent Facts 1. Applicant requests hardcover variance to remove and rebuild . Ha. .."40ver. The house and all of the proposed construction and are located in the 75-250* zone. Existing 75-0 hardcover is approximately 31.8% per Exhibit E-4. The appear to staff that the landscape areas underlaid by plastic account for a very small percentage of the hardcover on the property, and that plastic is probably necessary for foundation protection in most of the areas it exists, hence little can be gained by removal of plastic. The lakeshore bank in the 0-75' zone contains a series mmmmr - . -r • mm ret a be ret onl 4. * bu i rev ex i: sert the setl the 5. r feet pore intc Disc Thi i St ri layc Staf 1 anc h oui re 1 c Exhi and Staf staf 31.9 ’ of t addi neigl Administrator L9 Minnetonka D reconstruct le. This work ons Annotated and Proposed ? and rebuild ing deck was treated wood. replacement, landscaping, j location as struction and le. Existing bit E-4. The a 16 square esult of the dscape areas entage of the :: is probably the areas it istic. series ■ i < :j\ ftfifpimM *#r- my'-': iHH* Sv-walls, stairways, walkways and storage shed amounts to only 400 square feet or 2.1% hardcover. muuncs to Teko and no camp technically a variance to average lakeshore required here, the proposal does not increase thf existing technical encroachment on that average setback. into the easLent.° “ ‘‘ encroach Discussion ® replacement of existing layout^'^*^^ kand, with very minor revicions from the existing iS;iip3Ssiii s Exhibit F-6, note that the proposed balcony deck already exists and IS merely a replacement of that deck. ^ Staff Reconuienaationrnmmm mmm .n» -M ■■m.: :toj .’'v V? : V’ ’ ^ ■ V btV-jrviiiSiai W' t: k;^:J lii • . - ' V. Si CITY OF Initial <$50.0 Renewal (no ch A£ter-th m PROPERTY« Site Add Property Please cl Attach 1 required APPLlCAin Name Addz OWNER (if Name Addr PRESENT O. ^ • •■..* » ■ *, Prest Prest OESCRIPTK Deset A; ■ -.';a.( VARIANCES Setba Other 5 quite high with those I amounts to and no camp je proposed (r into the enerally is property to le lakeshore lot increase “tback. Kimately I0 ised screen it encroach >f existing le existing ote of the tnds of the sh ows th e iction. In eady exists !e to al low id approval finding no njoyed by tmi m vmm -m 'v ' m Mi'Mm. i?* * ' ■ V • ^ : ■ ipa m mmmm . f CITT OF ORONO - VARIARCB APFLlCATlOff Initial Application Fee $150,00 ($50.00 per each additional varia Renewal Variance Fee $75,00 (no change from original applicatioif)#1 -4^ i. r v» e>) (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION ** **“ Site Address 719 Minnetonka Highland Lane _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ih ng-in-?, ,, ,,p.. Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or torrens? U,i ^ •> m • * • t m, tk «' i t > V J A .•V„ V V V V*' «qSr^ed7™?"''’''°" if "ot included on V 4 •” • ; . w ■ - 4, t c • r «. «* • 4 «• < -£vA ' *.»*• ['.A 4wV' « t- V • • • - * , t * ** t. \ 1 vw - rr • -A r<?-< -If* t44*4 •*?.■ • T ■■Jt- » / 4n A. / i.* WPLICMT Name Robert K, Wallace AddressI 5800 Baker Road Phone (home) Phone (work) 938-9000 I - * Mi nnot-nnlra Zip t 5534S OW«R (If different than applicant) Phonrih^ersysIoaTa Name Dr, & Mrs. Robert Brandenburg Phone (work) Address! 719 Mtka Highland Lane cityi Orono Zip!55356 d Jjin^ 1 IMA . • %. . f, Date Property Acquire _ _ _I_ _ _ _adjacent parcels of land. PRB8BNT USB OP PROPERTY ——- Present Zoning District Present Use of Property (month/year) ■LRtIR Residential DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Other (specify) Estimated Construction Cost $40,000 Describe request existing deck & screen porch and VARIANCBS required Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front _x _ Hardcover Side __ _ _ Rear) m BARDSniP Describe enforces structure is of the existi DESCRIPTION 0 Describe Code Req __ req R8QUIRBD SUBN % (B Complete Certlfle this lis 348-3271 Stamped( names or obtained Certlf lC( Topograp in exist Plat Map As an ad ny othe iiudltion The Applican remember tha Information h. Certification Zoning Officii APPLICANT'S S The applican requested by unusual expen the informat knowledge. Applicant's S: OWNERS SI6NA1 The owner he authorizes r< agentsr Commi tion and veri Owner's Slgnat Applicant n Planning Cc third Mond( review meet unable to c authorized Office of I I ■•V? * I 'L- m ^ «• r* ^ « ‘ \ ' rr, . . ^ h. ;. V • ' • V *. *. v'i » .-:V • * • » • « ♦ V V • V V ^ • J ,• • . . .• . A w v'V.^ i V V r ;• /‘J — f V i U"i^ f J. ■ 1. i.‘ •* -ta : . u‘ * r-i,. -JQll b7 i ofi -/'V '-- *"5»Vfi -*.f* AA* •._ m t > .' t } i ■ t i • . • »W • f.: A V # / ^• -* ,,x IV,.. • t f / ’' r .f'o 1/ I / L .••..:/ h •“: p. * ) 938-9000 _ Zip« 55345 S-9918 ________ ,Zipx55356 ion th/year) Id. Residential ■V ■OBt $40.000 icreen porch and er Rear) \v' V ■■; ^7. ■ :-i m':- m /\ ■v-i ■*- .JlH . • :. t.J hardship /; 7^ V. *"' t -^ ' Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from stri enforcement of zoning regulations: The condition of the o»isting DBSCRIPTIOH OF UHUSOAL PROPERTY COITOITIONS located. Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: Irregular shape of lot makes Hardcover percentage requirement difficult to be achieved ti. 03) fIRQ> SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped# legal sized envelopes (110) pre—addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) If any changesi In existing grade are proposed. ,.Pl*t Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application# please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional Items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant an.l property Owner must sign remember that your variance application is Information has not been Included. this application. Please not complete if the above Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application Is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator# agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the Information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Applicant's Signature ONNBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# Commission members# and Council members for purposes of Investiga tion and verificatlon-^of/„^is request Owner's Signature Date /Wyg Applicant mu t have all submittathe City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Plafnfing Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting# please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 'iji J « V' ■ -.-i .P: resulting from stri ri of the existing in and circulation pattern € re-located. compliance with Zoning Hardcover percentage I 150* (you must obtain lance A-603 Govt Center ressed to each of the 8 (use address labels Lations as required, ations) if any changes ich a separate list of Lication. Iff. application. Please ioroplete if the above lication is complete. Date ormation required or pay all fees and/or Lonr and certifies that the best of his/her Date *“7 plication and further ty stafff consultantsr purposes of investiga- Date 7?a/yg ices 25 days before the etings are held on the !sent at all scheduled 1. If an applicant is rrangements to have an the Building & Zoning ♦' /' • 4*« ‘/I •X. ■|A» M X Camp Te "o «mera • Acknowl^geiMnt Form '««J Glen T. Nedermever lyyV'Z’^ r(print nameU)] - - -—- 709 Mtka Highland Lane 'print address zr;r.::: r^;r2^i^;;:Tr:.::;Tr ”“"V'.i (.re,lor.’.r7‘7' t. X . •cVEOval ei dlaapproval of fha proparty or uao t^t -aro., to oooffr. for tt. „., coo..„ .... y .. J., --------------- pf... o„o requires Council approval. ■>.' Date *^ropertyowner Date JpiS> mm thla Land daa"appllcaVi*onrplMaa*^abIIIl. f*"*** *" .I** ravloa of .00.0, Offic a. ...a. .. ia;;Vr?o;?o ’‘.!,.'VoUX'd”;.'.Eto;''dV';‘“‘"’ ‘ f i It- , M L- u.,_, N ISi I’M o. bm<pC< ld|ik«ahor« Setback Zone 0-75* 75-250* 250-f00* SOO-XOOO' RARtCOVEI c « E. OTH 01 fANZLT •LR-IC- ll B\ bi t1 W: W Cl h w a ■ '-rr-is ^ 'I;*' For*tawa Road I Highland Lane ^dress]u propoced use of the rred to as Land Use m /•f edgement, i (we) am the property or use ) am (are) aware of r*s project or use I ifei '/s/r • 'J^e^t-- y In the review of to the Building & Bting date. 4 - ;: n-lVi .K-£iV:i^ - ■•■ i mm mmm m mim ■ijr'. iir i \ :' f. H M. h ^5 h-. f' ■: "iiiliiwiif' WMtDCOVER caLCPIATIOW SOMMARf A. »•c.D. Lakeshor* Setback Zone Lot Area In Zone Cxieting Hardcover in Zone Exietlng Hardcover Percentage (B/A)xlOO Pinal Proposed Hardcover In lone Hardcover Percentage (0/A)xlOO Allowed Hardcover Percentage 0-75* 75-250' 250-500* 500-1000* 18,750 .f 400 sf 2.13 %400 sf 2.13 %0 21.875 mt 6,750 •f 30.86 t 6,766 of 30.93 %25 « sf «sf 1 30 « 9C ■f sf %sf %35 1 hardcover limitations hardcover INCLUDES! - Stroeturea with roofe •. Decks, even il slatted - sidewalks •* Driveways (paved or gravel) _,«#- w«, - Decorative landscaping areas underlain by plastic sheeting - Tops of retaining walla, rock walla - Any other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall Into the ground S. other lakeshorb regu lation^ SBC. 10.22. RBGDLAT101I8 P..ia.«ti:i OLtrlct th. follo.1., r.,ul.tlon. .h.« .pply. suba. 1. takeshot. Set B.ek brAa'ln. m*y*'be^loMt.a clo.et to their.r.‘:r.„“’th “ r:.v.rn.;ihr y"r:hr.rrth ’:.. ..fttn, ^..*-..0. buildings on adjacent and nearby lots, soba. 2. tekeehor. S«a ahall be no there eh'eXl bo no greater than 25* hard cover, within 75 to 250 feet of /horrtln * therr.hal I be no greater than 30% hard :ov«." «"thrn *500 Vo'loOO feet of th, ahorellne there ahall be no greater than 35. hard cover,r.,:-r:"r:.; rru ”- a permit from the Council. ■:>w : 1^KimiTf " F. Icover zentag€ 1^1x100 Allowed Hardcover Percentage .13 .93 I % t % % % % svel) iig areaa underlain by rock walla , does not allow direct .nto the grounu •LR-IC* AHO •LR*-1C-1* ORB lA-1% -LR-IB", •LR-1C% or regulations shall applyt ik from the shoreline lor r be located closer to the e of existing residence > feet of shoreline there >r permanent structures eater than 25% hard cover, to greater than 30% hard 11 be no greater than 351 5 feet of the shoreline I without first obtaining ^ "0RK81MBT f . HARDCOVgA OKPTItXwre - j,- ^ such as roofs, driveway., sidewalk. etcT * ^»l>«rFlou. surface. rhardcoverN JrlT hV I’"* **« «' r.\r-I fo areas before entering the a S>covB« (Oil. *" ’»• of th. I.k.,hor., HgJsrOcojss 1, .iio..., f ‘ I Jt" .......... •1' ■■>»< ^llo 350*'500*t In *r«... ,.i. ^-- ^ ee evAAiB, _ s •.TJl:.. . tv.ni fro. tb. oVth« 'of tb*. W. ir/U'bfrSr."./.^' "^’.uhV; -t .b.."... x... . ^rdcover perce^ijcTfcunUoir^ SgTBArw .^g^ (to be used as denominator In all .0*»75* tore Ar.. - 75* « wlotb of lo. f„ o-7S* „n. \ mmmrnt^r-m »«.e.^Re^e ^ •wiic «S| M..ai. par.Il.f .o .bor.Un. (Avg width) *) lB.7Sn ■ #, (j^j 25-250 » gone Area of 0-75* rone ’M *r.. . U75.0. xo. o.p.b X„ .obo, ' sieasure parallel to shoreline 175 * 125 (Avg width) ***• 250-500* Bonn ft. •21.875 s.f. f2) Area of 75-250* tone *r.. . (X50. o. .V, xo. 0.p.b x„ „b.l ./bo, of,., of Xo. X„ X50-500. .o„.V \ measure parallel to shoreline / 250* X (Avg width) 500-1,000 I Xnwa ft. «s.f. (3) Area of 250-500* tone *r.. . (SOO. o. .V, xo. ,.p.b X„ „„„ \ measure parallel to shoreline , / 500* X (Avg width) ft. - B.f. (4) Area of 500-1,000* tone i4: .y V W-mm [b -v Ir; ? ri wm oo um Iu tj 54 Di C •H 4im •v4 K lU r-i id I •s i 4 nI5 4 3 I 54 10 O' 5 4l VI2 Co M M U Z 4J O CA I I•# I « •• iUCiSBBBT ►<S an ordinance Uniting «a aurfacea (*hardcovar”) ted within 1,000 feet of a carried Into the lake quality of water In the infall run*-off will be •a before anterlng the Hardcover ia allowed »n 75* and 250* fron the »een 250* and 500* feet overed. lan 500* and 1,000* feet overed. t abut the lake but la aa denominator In all In 75-250* eone\ L to ahorellne ) In 250-500* *one\ 1 to ahorellne / in 500-1000* sone\ I to ahorellne / wm m '.A JH \-Mi ■. ^ >?■ 4 f- '^4 • [ - -• 4 -T § a a %4 a %4 m • • ^ %4 w4 Co M G •H :s 4 Z 5 l4 4t U tJ 4m M go •H 4i •H-o 4: •o s G S 41 M a a IM IM a a a 4 e a il a tM I I I I 5 •O N M M H 5C^s r-l 9 S 4 CP 4 M 4 3 %4 • ti %4 « M c I %4 w4 M 0^ i ^ - 4 *! ^G ifra • 0 trc Ms O u•0 IPc •H & a %4 a a il a %d a Oo CN >%sa; > •H U Q O in •4 < G V *0 su M a a o 00 H M M N O M M 4 M* sS. e•o 'a <i) >rj •H H ^ “gw *t Ttl 'S •i m :-v >> :•••giW.a: %4 • • IM • • %4 a i m M H Ii: o «o ias M 4 C •Hfra a iM a a IM a il a IM 4 a a a «M a a IM a 9 & 8 4 X3 G Z U G•H ^ iP 4 4 4 •H 4 *H 4 M P 4 4 a 4 4 *0 4 ia C >t jC 4 9 n 4 a ■: :• ;r m^y ■4 i^&iH ^;-fi ym • .• .t .•»'■• •• .*% .f‘-'- V- mm ^a V v - •.. ;.j| M H O y 6 *H»• 'rf ^ on fi la «i c U fH «| *r| M Iff M «i ti 10 €1 a «> C 41 no 41 y M c xj i4 10 9 JQ M M *0 JO H O 0) -P H ^ x; 0) 10 to cn 0$ 2 •s5 i iafc-v " -4 IS! 5^ • III I 8 1%mi U 0 1 •H•0 1 •Pu 1 Sc\a B(r| ^• G 1 AJ^ 1 M u ^ 1 cm I 0•H 1 K|u Ml M - s IH.'. O C ' N N \ N \ ^ ^ N «« • «10 m CO m 811 0 in 0 in c IT 0 A <J .-N CM no CN H t’,i" •1 ■■m 1 f■■i . •1 i •• x: 4i tJ iH H N 1 M 1 1 M I ^I fM IT *0m K 00 M cn H in K 0 ^ M IT fs 00 00 1v.> ».% '. >* M*• 4 isi4.' iiT Viii? ^ § SMS “ ■ •. ••:• •.:.••;■.• ••. -vi ■ .•,. «, t- I y c -H a 4i oi Jj m w GO M iq 10 01 U r-4 4J ^ C S *0 ^ 4> ^ - «0 9 i-5 V -. vy U f r *• ii 't :-fe 21 p< S)- G€ Br Si M Th ac ap wi mo be fo: bei Th< anc ac] nai is the tie Coir As Cor Cou Pla of ;|j;-:;-.. • .,v;:5 -V ... PRESENTER Peter Jarvis, BRW, inc. ITEM GeneralRezoning, 32.6 acre parcel, Generally Located in the Northwest Quadrant of T H inn slna?e Pre^LiLr^ Plat iTr 23Single Family Lots & Related Outlets. background This item is a Sketch Plan review, and therefore no required Of the Planning Commission. knce^tMs^ »j??i will, in all liklihood, be the first that the citv morito?Lm^that°h^°"^"^ *"‘’® of the development ^h« ?. j U ^ covered this area, as well as the first to for this a?la*'°s^alf‘'?2it®tr?^ ”"•*’ standardsbeneficial " informal review would be The land contained in this application is owned bv Sid Rebers and is proposed for development by Rebers Homes ^The 32 s nlrrlw":?r?b"of PlariS;s 111 but^ CoiHPrehensive_Plan RelaMonshipg corridor Itu'^v'lrif property is located within the Highway 12 Counci? ar^fo^^f?’ adopted by the City Planm'ng ?oLfs™on shou?rrefe? tS%harr‘’"""'r%‘’^""' Of pertinent comprehensive ^L'nning issLf?""”""" arcel, . 12 and ?lat for 25 £/ . . /wimmw ■■ii- • ■ ■-■■ ;.VilittfeJiil lo formal ice this lat the City lent ^he first to f standards 'ould be Sid Rebers he 32.6 11 but a dings that n reviewing d (southern highway 12 by the City Plan, the Dr a review Although there are several goals and objectives and general issues that are addressed throughout the report, this property and Its immediate area are specifically referred to on pages 49 through 52. Three alternatives are presented for the development of this site and the recommended alternative is presented on page 52. Throughout the hearing process, every alternative plan prepared by the land owner's representatives, as well as thf» city's consultants assumed the retention of the business/commercial There has been some recent discussion with the applicants about the development of that portion of the property for multiple residential use. You will notice that portion is not included in the application that is before y oLi • The recommended alternative states that the property north of should be developed for single family lots, public water and sewer. This section also states that the allowed density should not exceed that which is on Alternate 3, on page 51. since Alternate 3 shows 25 lots and the proposed preliminary plat contains 25 lots, it IS consistent with the intent of the Plan in this area. As you will note in reviewing this portion of the study, the remainder of the discussion centers on the need to improve the road system in this area. The satisfaction of the remaining Comprehensive Plan directives will occur at the time that formal plans are prepared for the southern portion of this land. It IS in this area that the final alignment of the frontage road will be determined, the specific improvements to Ind intersection, and the specific location and design of the storm water pond will all be decided. At this point in the review process, the applicant has Jf^^^^^^ness to negotiate reasonable commitments to comply with these planning requirements. The details of these and in particular the timing and financial this those off-site improvements, as tney relate to this application, will be reviewed in greater detail later in tne process. Zoning Issues Since this application covers a parcel that is within the Ccrridor Study Area, it will be subject to review zoning standards to be adopted to implement the finalized, the proposed Special Minimum Requirements For Rezoning In The Highway 12 !s and general 't, this property ■ed to on pages 49 for the Iternative is ive plan prepared s the City's ess/commercial recent discussion hat portion of u will notice n that is before operty north of ngle family lots, n also states t which is Iternate 3 shows ains 25 lots, it his area. the Study, the d to improve the the remaining e time that tion of this nent of the improvements to specific location decided. :ant has s commitments to i€ tails of these Lng and financial 5 they relate to ietail later in within the lect to review ) implement the le proposed le Highway 12 wm Mm £ -T corridor Study Area, along with the standards and reguireraents Of thfs“aref'''"?L"?"f?’ <iistrict would govern the d^elop^ent ot this area. The following paragraphs summarize those thf^'prSpSs^l^atances!"""'^ satisfied as Special Retirements, Highway 12 Corridor: A. Minimum Area special requirements for ”res %h2re a minimum of five of this mlnfl,™ discussion about the increase includes 32.6 acres, it is'well tn excess of the minimum area requirements. B. Access and Circulation Plan As noted above, key access and circulation issues will be ?ronta~ specific alignment of the propiseffrontage road is determined. The section on the alternative for this area states that the residential area would be served by a cul-de-sac or wesf ^If ®>^°"n Road with no connection to thewest. If tne frontage road is installed. Consequently standard, provided' commitments can be negotiatad^^for the Somf inLf"? c°i-struction of the proposed frontage road. report ® included in a later section of this C. Sanitary Sewer Availability ®"9ineering consultant has reviewed this sefefwith report that the site can be ssiSp;;.5VE;fc?itr''" D. Stormwater Management indicates that a storm drainage plan Brown^Roarf^^ intersection^of^ o^the neL^?fr. 12. The applicants are aware^ stormwater pond and the City's concern to runoff to area lakes, and have agreedto prepare detailed plans to meet these standards. krMt-VT' r • L- I; r ■ E. Available Zoning Districts This proposal is for a rezoning to R-IA, One Family Residential District through the PRD, Planned Residential Development process. Both of these zoning districts are listed among the availabi-^ zoning districts for rezoning within the Highway 12 Corridor Area. F. Building Design and Construction These standards are intended to control the development of multifamily residential, commercial and industrial uses, and are not intended to apply to single family residential development. G. Requirement of Development Agreement It is anticipated that a development agreement will be drafted and executed prior to the completion of the approval process. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARV Site Area: Single Family Lots: Homes per acre: Private (shared) open space: Average Lot Size: Area in Private Roadway: Sq. Ft. 32.6 Acres 25 .76 8.4 acres 35,000 sq. ft. (0.8 ac.) 2.2 ac. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS Although it appears that with the continued refinement of the proposed plans and the completion of continued analysis, negotiations, and agreements, that the required findings for consistency with the Special Minimum Requirements For Rezoning in the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area can be met. There are, however, some design details that should be discussed and resolved through the review and approval process. The first issue relates to the location of the access onto Brown Road. The City Engineer recommends that this access should either be moved north to the top of the hill, or south, approximately 50 ft. The second issue is the length of the proposed cul-de-sac. The proposed length is 2100 feet. While the City does not have a standard for private streets, it does limit the extent of public cul-de-sacs to IOOl ft. All of the alternatives prepared by the City's consultant showed the roadway in this subdivision connecting to Pine Ridge Lane. 1 The adopted Plan does not require this connection and specifically states that either a cul-de-sac, or a looped street would be acceptable. We recognize that the adjacent neighbors do not want the connection and Mr. Rebers doesn't want the connection, but there are some good public safety reasons for the limitation of the length of such streets. Frankly, it is debatable whether the fact that the proposed street is to be privately owned is enough to waive this standard, we would need to review this issue in more detail before commenting on that. What concerns us about the case in point is that, if it is processed as a straight rezoning and the street remains a 2100 ft. cul-de-sac, a variance may be required. The granting of a variance requires the finding of a hardship and we do not believe that such a finding could be made. If the proposed plan was processed as a PUD, the opportunity to save additional trees, or similar benefits could be cited to justify the departure from the strict interpretation of the rules. ► When the actions that cities take are boiled down to their essence, they should be reasonable. If the only justification for this cul-de-sac length is to achieve exclusivity in this neighborhood, one has to ask when the same argument could not be used. The danger lies when the City wants to require some needed future connection and the applicants in those cases can point to examples in the past when the City has not followed its own rules with insufficient justification. Barring compelling reasons to the contrary, we recommend the looping of this street. The proposed plans include provision for significant trails and "woodland preserve". These plans cho.ld be reviewed by the Parks Commission to insure that the necessary community wide connections can be accomplished. As you know, the site is heavily wooded. The developer proposes to grade in the private street and install utilities, but to leave the lots alone until a specific house plan is approved. Such lot plans will be reviewed by an architectural review committee and particular scrutiny will be paid to maximizing the preservation of existing trees. In our experience, this approach to the development of heavily wooded sites yields the best result^. That concludes a basic overview of the proposed plan. A copy of the City Engineer's memo has been attached for your review because it includes some additional information that you may find helpful. We will be in att^xndance at the meeting to answer any additional questions, or assist you in your deliberations regarding this matter. We will also send a copy of this report to the applicants in hope that they can respond to some of these questions and concerns in their presentation. .... • i. BonestroOi Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects {August 6, i$88 Otto G Bonestroa PE Bobert W Roser^. PE Joseph C Anderlin. PE Brjicf^d A Lemberg. PE Richard E TUmer. PE James C Oison. PE Glenn R Cook. P£ Thomas E Woyrs. PE Keith A Gordon. Pt Richard W Poster. PE Donald C Burgardt. PE Jerry A Bourdon. PE Mark A Hanson. PE Ted K Field. PE Michael T Rautmann. PE Robert R Pfefferie. PE Thomas W Peterson. PE Michael C Lynch. Pf James R Maland. PC Kenneth P Anderson. PE Keith A Bachmarm, PE Mark R Rolfs. PE Robert C Russek. AI A Thomas E Arvgus. PE Charles A Erickson Leo M Paweiiky Harlan M Olson Susan M Eberlm Mark A Seip 300 1st Avenue North Suite 210 Minneepolit, Mn 55401 Attn: Hr. John Shardlov Het Pile No. 139«1322 Meyer's Woods bear John, We have reviewed the preliminary plan submittal for the Rebers property on Brown Road and T.H. 12. There are several engineering items that should be discussed before approval of the plan. 1. Brown Road Access - The access point for the residential subdivision should be moved north to the top of the hill or couth approximately 50 feet. 2. 3. 4. Cul-de-sac - The cul-de-sac length is 2100 feet. The city does not have a maximum length for private roads but does have a maximum length of 1000 Eeet for public roads. It would be desirable if, the street were construc ted as a loop rather than a cul-de-si»c. Frontage Road - The plan should provide for an east-west frontage road from T.H. 12 to Willow Diive. This right of way could be provided adjaent to T.H. 12 or between the commercial industrial property. Traffic Volumes - The projected traffic voluesm from the residential prop erty would be 200 to 250 vehicles per day. We would expect about a 50-50 split because of the intersection problem at T.H. 12. 5. Storm Sewer - The developer should provide a storm drainage plan for the area. Ponding will be reouired near the intersection of Brown Road and T.H. 12. 6. Sanitary Sewer - The site can be served with sanitary sewer through Long Lake (Joint Powers Agreement) or by constructing a new Interceptor line (see T.H. 12 corridor sanitary sewer study). Page 1. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 6f2’636*4600 ■atvi....i,------fmri^f ■■ ::r ■ . r)^. *• *• ’•«- • * f . M Shardlov Uban, Etc.August 8» 1988 te: File No. X39 7. Water Hain - The site can be served with private wells, public nains through Long Lake (Joint Powers Agreement) or by Orono independent system. 8. Streets - The street alignment does not meet the 30 MPH design speed. The speed limit would have to be reduced to 20 MPH if the proposed alignment is approved. The typical section should be provided on the plan. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly. BOMESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCtli cct Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono Page 2. ii’ ;urr«y Ter itts Suiicsrs Icc. of 7, Sloci S, r:isnetsr<A Uii;V^ir.ic Zata-.at ii«iuM->ls Count?, Kinnoaota CortifiMU of Curroyj : =;*r«i7 fortify t.it tJii- la k tru* ar^ eorroct rk-irof«n7kt:e.. sf t :urr*y of toua.iri*.a of ii>t 7, 2l«Ki; Z. IZxsM-.Ttiit irt-Ms, th# isc-tii” of ukZ jalt'ini tulliiit. ijtori-.:, tad C.V jC'ftBi'iti j .octtioc a:’ a arossaji Vuildl.-,. It ao*. .surrart » khow o'JMr ta^T.--;30bU or oaerskcit- Bsntr. Sealot 1" • 6Q: Into ! 5-7-79 0 : iron sarZur il'tit. B, Snl-ieor :.• .ijrV5 Uiui iiur*o?973 irj Plssaara B ob ^ «kiGi, l';iaetMtB Certificat0 Of Survey scale i”a i 250* Setback Property Line .oC'X i: "^'VV i (^75* Setback Site Plan SCALE l"«60'lofS SCALE Vi5"*l'o" CProperty Line— ^ Proposed Landscape Plan # ipn- ‘ SCALE V8"-l'o"3of6 ' Proposed cone. > Line of existing cone.#1320 Linn of existing stairs and landing . 1 /\/ \/\\/ \l/ Existing Houss 7^■Proposed landing \ Line of existing porch «Proposed landing \ / ^*^Line of existing stairs and landing' Proposed/Existing Deck Relationsliip SCALE V8"«l'o"4 Of 6 y- ■ "4y* IL tJ /O Proposad thraa smsob porch with dcc^ —^— Proposed balcony deck : f-r' hons«>^ T ----- i!i i South Elevation SCALE l'-0"5of6 'L~f iL, Elavaiioiis West SCALE V4"*l'-0" I k 6of6 r-ms O 3 <n 310 n lO — r*rB i a> 05 • 21 “ § '•O* 3 J 3 rt) . o c n r+n — K F *< * o tn Q> O C+ D* rt) ?r- 3 l\i CO a» o o -j - 3 VO t/) 03 00 -<p t/ t (b • %H 1 « ->► . 3 ^9 5 sK. - r J> C' ?l (1 ^; ' :t) ^ ^ i !? ^ ^ vJ o ^j . Ki w ^ n ^ j ^ ^ ^ ? 5 O s“ ? 'O t-'' H» 3 X Z Tl OJ V sj> r f* •^r vj f »l V ^ 3^<y h s? •4^X c/ 4r^ t*t\ 0>'IvC' n /’c/’ f//S/fi ^V 0 I ?I lA •< ■m 'Mj'' "■4 . , -■* ■ '4 ’•' T'' 7r JL o> JL o * ]fcf ■';v;: r the South lino of Gov't Lot S, See. 9 4^2.93 ^ _____ ISOM>' ^ S.39*SS'00"W. / 197.93 VtotA-ie If £>W 4 fKviD .. NAIL r‘. 5« MO-r s hearings 'Csy SOXP-Z ^ fort^ ^ i;;:;,.l> ■<•■' )0 2_O ,;Vts r.i-- .' -tv“o.r; u'.' r; 5.™ » J----->.........-M ....tt:# 5Wo2yi- •* 4,6»(8 <^i<./rVtouit^ 7!T'2S0 Pc/^ c/lSP"^ ‘4 : • iI «tE i V a 2 I i I 5 '5s X Per <i//6/n f •h . ■ ■ i /^/=’ <=7-J i/ys/^i ’i e*M- D- 0-7s' 7 VfA * S2. sr vn^t A^m L b M» su^ lew.,,' H4r**Ovjrt^ y ...............-' -J*-S* <*>C»£ '»J ovr«- Si ir. /fcO sf . n i-(^. — ^2»i /zy% (706 ^static: *■'“- ^teposvv- Ao&fTioi^ /M 6>'7T f^S if . / Mst fa><M,x<r Ar^>—‘WW.Mr---;.... .. !A...J 1 C^000m »% #-«■7T«0tlf /Mof « » ^__tt.1%/*$o fff rt /% *»»••**•*gf0tu A j /xs%ftt0 Hf >•'f*.vv. - 8Cfl s^. zin:t. // (SAA wv/ -C h ISZ. :^.// /swys^- ij Vtmtt Arn I \ffirk. jyC. L*ti* M.n"*t..<C« ,' 7,-r-^r Pep f//s/n \ COFFIN X CKONnHK'C. INC. Engineers. I.iiiiil Surveyors Long l.iike, Mhiiiesiilii Topographic Survey for Gerald R‘. Nelson In Tract A. R.L.S. No. 565 Hennepin County, Minnesota 4JL -p ti J \ -rw-; ifkU : 1" = 20’ 7-5-88 Iron Darker Existing contour Existing elevation Elevation on 7-8-«''i COFKIN & GRONHKKC, INC. \Engineers, l.aml iii vevor.s 'Long l.iike, Ninncsola PCffi K/<inn in (j djbmmiss^oA fc9 yidnnincj (L&mrnis&icm, fYl^e^irvj - /SfilS ij ?c9