The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-18-1988 Planning Packet% r ' % . PlAmmG OOHHI^CM MMUIIU momukY, JOLT It, If it 7s ot p.n. 1275 WBOm MM) 800n > OOOMCIL COi I - ^ Ij :1L UPSBSBHTHTIVB - Barbara Peterson ATTBBMKS fUMJC OMtlBG 1. 7s00 p.m. *1301 David L. Ifhite 6 Fredrick C. Nbite, 180 North Shore Drive Neat - Class 3 Preliainary Subdivision 2. 9100 FB. Zoning AsiendBent - Signage 3. 9:15 |).a. Zoning AMndaient - Fences Mcnom iTBffi Gene s Catherine Scanlon, 2815 casco Point Road Conditional Use Perait t Variance - Third Review Gary Roderick Construction, 1749 North Fam Road Variance - Second Review Referred Back to Planning C^siission by Staff Conditional Use Permit -* Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit * Public Rearing 4.#1207 5.11286 6.11291 7.11300 8.*1302 9.*1303 10.11304 11.*1305 12.*1306 13.*1307 14.*1308 Variance - Public Hearing Variance - Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Variance Public Hearing Variance - Public Hearing SKBTBCH PIAH REVIEW 15. City of Orono - Plan for Bike/Riking frails - Park Commission - Bob Host ~ John Gerhardson ADDITIONAL ITEMS 16. Planning Commission approval of June 20, 1988 Minutes. 17. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the August 8, 1988 Council Meeting. ADJOOR lii i . J 0r f » To:rroat Date: 8al»jt flanninq CoHoiSBion Chairoan Fallay !Plannin9 CoooiBBlofi He*b«rB City Adoinistrator BarnhardBonMichael f. Caffron, heat. Plannln, ( tonln, Melnlattator July 14» #1301 David and Fraderlck Whit., liO itorth Shore Drlv# Waat * PrellBinary SubdlviBion- Public B.arii»g - R.au.Bt for Subdivision of 18 acr. parc.l into two 2 scr« b^ldable lots and an outlet of approxi»at.ly 10 acres. .0.1., DUtrict - W-l« 8in,l. raelly «ur.l heaWential. * •«. un.e«er.d. jj^st of Bahlbita A “ Application C - oener’e tl.t - I^ter tro. Belghbor hero.. Co. M. »* P > Proposed Plat I : ^ St.,* Motatioa. G - Staff Conceptual Sketches Xaipeiidifigi fertieent Facta - * s 1.dry BUILOABLE WETLAKD TOTAL Lot 1 Lot 2 Out Lot A 2e006 AC 3.087 9.402 0.998 AC 1.721 3.004 AC 4.808 9.402 Total Parcel Excluding Roads 14.495 2.719 17.214 i:;r.«rto‘‘h:“irc‘t-io*nYn,‘ -5 i".t.,f. opinion. In the relatively near future. Proposed Lot 2, as shown on the ^sifiVable s*t*e"V<rr septic fpV^’oM.rtVr^ *1^ irc\*r*r.St°?yVropo".‘.v: h‘.v: uV^"t.rtuTldVnr-v'^^ -Ithout thl. additional acre.,.. Appplicant has agreed to this revision. The .applicants have provided septic testln, within th. proposed Outlot *. . k 1 j staff would note that Zona Pile 11301 July 14, 198t Paga Two of Four 1C applicants' intent is to build a house within the I larga parcel, it should not be designated as an outlet but as a separata lot that is larga enough to be potentially divided in the future. Conceptually, an outlet is only designated whan a parcel is intended to not be used until further developed. Staff would note that all of the sites tested on the property require sound systaas. This is not unusual considering the lilkenny loaB*>type soil located in this area of Orono. 3. Rote the *gerrynandered* configuration of proposed Lot 2. It is staff's understanding that this configuration caee about because the applicants are coepelled through a Cowrt Order to sell a 2-*scre parcel to Donald and Judy Keepf as a result of a Purchase hgreeeent entered into by Kaepfs and Whites in 19S4. You will note that Lot 1 just barely contains 2 acres of dry, buildable land. Staff has drawn in the building envelope for Lot 2, and suggests that while there eay be a feasible house locstion directly south of the Langert exception, a more probable and attractive building site is east of the drainfield sites tested within the 1.3 sere recommended additional parcel. It would seem to staff that the east/west line between Lots 1 and 2 could be straightened out to provide a more useful potential secondary alternate drainfield site for Lot 1, while still leaving a plus-or"minus 150 foot wide corridor to the rear for Lot 2. 4. The applicants have not provided a topographic suip of the property. The topographic section of the OSGS Maps is of a scale that it has little value in discussions of the development of this property. Based on the fact that the property contains a significant area of wetlands, staff feels that it is appropriate for Planning Commission to require that a topographic map of the entire property be provided. 5. In Exhibits G, 1 through 3, you are provided with a plat map sketch showing existing development in the area, showing the proposed division and the probable future request for development of Outlot A without the need for an interior road, and finally a conceptual diagram of how the areas to the east of County Road 19, south of Bayside Road and north of North Arm Drive West will likely develop under the 2"scre standard. Given the existing developments along North Arm Drive Nest, staff would see North Arm Lane extending northward and then west to County Road 19, with the outlot road being taken from properties on either side. It probably is not feasib'’e to ask for dedication of roadway south of the existing White house, since it is only 45* north of the existing side lot line. Staff would also anticipate a northerly extension up to Bayside Road that would allow 2 acre lot development on either side of it. Looking at exhibit G-3, the question becomes, is there a need to dedicate property within the currently proposed plat for future access? Summary of Issues - 1. The north lot line of proposed Lot 2 is intended by the applicant J K ' toM File «1301 July 14, 19M Pag* Threa of Fourto aove north 150 foot, leaving about 4.5 dry, buildable acrea within lot 2. Baaed on this configuration. Lot 2 would not bo further aubdividable under the two acre unaewered toning. Planning Coamiaaion ahould then diacuaa whether a lot width variance aa eeaaured at the 50 foot aetback from County Road 19 ia appropriate, and ahould diacuaa whether or not the eaat/weat line between Lota 1 and 2 ahould be atraightened out rather than gerrymandered, a* ia currently propoaed. 2. Ia Outlet A intended for iaiaiediate developaient aa a tingle reaidential lot, or ia it atrictly to be held for a future aulwliviticm? If it ia going to be aubdivided in the future, what configuration doea Planning Coeeiaaion feel would be eoat appropriate? Given that deteraiination, ia there any need to dedicate future acceaaea with the current aubdiviaion? 3. Topographic nap waa not provided, to thia Subdivision Af^lication? OitcoatioB - la a topographic aiap critical The teated drainfield sites and proposed building site on the property are 250 feet or more eaat of County Road 19. In walking to the rear of Lot 2 around the north end of the wetland, it was apparent that portions of this property have been used aa a dumping ground for many years. Perhaps the beat thing that could happen to this property would be developsMnt into 2 acre lota with subsequent individual owners cleaning up the dump aites. For the record, staff would note that most of the junk on the property will have to be hauled out and not buried on the site. Likewise, you will note the excessive amount of outside storage on the property, including vehicles and building materials. The existing house is currently rented, but upon completion of the subdivision it will be sold to a new owner, and presumably the storage will disappear. A further comment: If you plan to walk to the rear of the property to see the building aite for lot 2, there is a pathway that generally follows the edge of the wetland and it was dry the day I walked it, but wear your hiking boots. Staff Bernmmf ndBti<xai * Staff would recnmend approval of thia subdivision, subject to resolution of the issues noted above. If Planning Commission doea recommend preliminary plat approval baaed upon the proposed configuration or one similar to it, such a recommendation for approval should incorporate the following conditions: 1. Payment of appropriate park fee for Lot 2. 2. Place specific stipulations on Outlot A that define the reasons it is being approved as an outlot rather than as a separate Lot 3. ' / J \ *4 j I ■i • V' ft 1 Zoning Pile il30lJuly 14, 1968 Page Four of Four 3. Granting of m Conservation andl Flnrage Eai«cnt ova* the wet lend in lot 1 and 2. 4. Granting of the> appropriate draina^ and utility easoents alon^ all property lines. 5. Consider the probable request by lennepin Cottnty for additional right'>of'vay width al<»g County Road 19. i. Make a policy atateeent regarding the City's position on the future access to these properties. N < J »1f‘ it. II *1 % rtdm -Jikcm or OROBO - sotdxvisioh otlicrM ««»«»«» 4* «» «»«* «•«»«» «K « psotatfir ixjCATioB Site Address </?(7 /V^AT/^ (A T ^ ^Property Identificstion Nvis^Mr (P.I.D.) ^ Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or X_ torrens? 3-Z d?<5c?3 ^ > Attach legal deacriptlon to application. <»«—---------- d, . Uj HfTt^ Raise C y/titTP Phone (work)------------------------ City 8 Omnai (if different than applicant) Phone (home) , __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work).,. . . .. . -eeft-e Address:City I Zip: (attach list if nore than onei t 08BniSTIBG LAM Niusber of Tax Parcels Development Size I cn r vT ;z -t-Acres Dry Land Acres Met Land Acres Total, all parcels- ^ aT i ^r a»vr*Mwi* we > avw Vi a.v Ti . “V.i. t.. > Present Use (check)Residential; no Other (specify) . of units,.—y rAi^i Ui:iO-tj-rrrrrrrr gggftiismammmmm S3 Present Zoning District ^ PROPOSAL _ _ _ _ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for Rew Building Sites Number of Building Sites:} / Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units Rew Units Total Units Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ k ■i • ■ J ‘ M * i- r i * nmMm MtTBMM. iwassjun rt» cowtwt rt.a.initaMJ smiancm2*. oast obtain?*br.“xift r/orrsi:„^rSoJ:^t%‘ ^'psT^” -vt c.nt.t*• AvVboV.^i^isVriib^:: (».. .<»<.*... i.b.i. obtained with property omtrn^* attach a separata list of *• “y otS«^“on. you «lrt notifi«l of this appUctxon. cortific.tion by tor.ln, Dopartoont that Pr.U-ln.r, Plat Application is eoim>iete. Date Zoning Official’s Signature 1. 2: 3.0 4. 5. Parent of faori^rkfeas, filing fee, se«sr “J**"*"''*’‘ cortlficatrof .arvsy or aylar copios of for-al plat. Title opinion. Easeaients# Covenants# etc. SS^eio^ori Mrs—nt and Letter of Credit t * ^-----LLj ^■r-e'.v ..t-j O - 17-i-/ agi;^a;a.?.-si:!.sr;"“ ,y ‘.rrv- r‘sSgZigS" FBBS Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II l» 1H> Preliminary Review (Class I i II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 Preliminary P.evie* (Clas. Ill and all non-re.idential) Pinal Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant ^©^eby Engineer^^^c"ity* ?ir\”?er\gr^s to fee."established by ordinance. Date ^y^-py^ ^-Applicant's Signature JZ^ g. 7.9 Date C> C /Sf B Applicant must have all submittal. Vling”a'*r” ^h« Planning Commission Meeting, must be present at all scheduled ^^ireV„°e"e?i?>g°s^rt!;e"°P?^::Ain7s^^^^^^^^ rtSir\r\°d \\Vn\\\r/r rdni\"/v^fse"hTBSnaing s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. it-' If,^-V \ =1 r • ' s ->' J rMe A h ► ^ ■ f- ^-•v f- • V“ ‘*vt, r' Mar 31t 1989 ^Rmlt 3. If^sn ‘^ib fffirrs.MonoNS omd centbi33 TINTH AVENUE SOUTH SECOND FLOC«lHOPKINS. MN 55343 (612) 933-5151 / Praderick C. bhit* 1419S 1^1 Drive Rotfere, Mn. 55374 Re: Donald Keapf, et al v. David L. Whit#, at al Our Pile: 85>959 0«ar Fred: In accordance with our conversation, 1 aa providinc rou with the eleaenfa of the eettlement acreeaent that wee entered into the court record before Judtfe Janes Rocere on Mar 9th of 1983. The following are the terms of the anreenent: L The Whites would provide an approved plat of the propertr within six Bwnths from the date <A the agreement. 2. The Whites would conver a lot on which the house was situated that contained a ninimun of three Krres and approved br the Citr« 3. The purchase price for the parcel described above would be $85,0(X).(X). The terms would be $1,(X)0.(X) earnest moner, which has been paid; $9,000.00 at closinc; and a Contract for Deed bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum, due and parable in full four rears after the date of closing. Parmenta on the contract would be at the rate of $650.(X) per sionth. 4. The Kempfs would par their pro rata share of taxes on the lot transferred to them, and the Whites would par the differential between the hosiestead and non-homeetead taxes. The Kempfs would applr for homestead imsiediatelr after closing. If yon need further verification of this agreement, please have a representative of the Citr contact me. I have enclosed a statement with regard to attorner fe®s, as a separate attachment. This statement is in accordance with our conversation. Please-call^ if there is _any additiona^uestion. / Yours very ^uly, ^ RONALD J.,ifpHNSON'^LAW OFFICES P.A. nald J. Johnson / '•RJJtsej •eMHW )• % .V J •J* ■ 'if:' f /V * \sr ' A ii kr-- “D ' r/^ i.((V. \f;%sl«i5 z 6’r►*>«zmz M c 3M M co s -4 n•,s5 «l »- r- $ n« % o < ii •»o) m r 3 M « S m c ■• •• •r* ^► C »5t M m c c X -< 9 ^ i f e X 13 8 8 •41 I o> Or« o oo 1 i X -• «S > J0V -<m3 I #» r< ^ ► 5r* -< •» !• ► W -4 ►4 f-* r* z o •• -< fp -< «/l *8 I «lyn 8»S- sis: •4 n VI M Z yi C M #-« n X H I E<-"hi gs IP •3 M i" •> 9 CS IP fp mn m I fp M Om < ffi f Pt M » «S. -4 _^ X8f- ^ «p fS ^isi:XX 5«P94I PI IP H X XmxSS T a mS X «4 Z X X99 XX• r* X X^ ? Qpi|p» X X i|§^S- X fp rp IP X --^ * -AX m ^ M X ^ ® 2 ;s o 99 99 « s X s 9 l;^(PI m IP 8. i iIt* 8«s *s » I 3 » IP W Wi IP PI ’*J t t si I 4I 3 3 So 8iii:i M M X st^l sSra i ^ MX-S? *8o3g 8 8 lil M 8- -a , OJ C f INIgsssss^ <<•- pi M *"« ASg§^ iitHlSr#> -I H •• PI X ^ 8 ipi Pm pm 2 X Mill*• S"85 % 9 C3‘ 94 X gS? i8SS*S s"-S:XWl 8 4» -4 M 8 •“B s I :p Ja * - has'-23X O X • IP *p IP «/• IP "3®fp 8il IP IP S 8 41 3 Sm i III|j,^P» Z C•Pg 919“4OX3 - tf» fli;)as3 8'> »# -< *4,O O*j..^ z 3 W fp fp if*m M «S3 ^ O fP IP "•SS2 •4 IP m IP 94 IP X «» X Si m 2 «P «P i°° yi 3 3 3 w S IP fp 5f! o S SMgJJJg <o»• f■• •• •- IP 9^^ 83 94 94 S3 I iS I sisi« X IP a n -4 H VP X m IP 1^ X B I **83 88 gwu53 -33 § = ooPt B3 'H -4 -4 94 X•p X H fP X s« B M f •' I %. •■ t: _ /., -■■■ •■•.*.- 4- *■ 41 'i J'ff^ J *'■ t. f * 4'- >4 •l I i* 1 I .•^Av ■J.i-l 'A V -M ^V . V^' IKi * jiH «i / I ■ I ■ ^ r « ^ , ^ i, W■i,’ LJ iv./fc^|j^ JU.I2968' l.l[j\i I\ 'ffi , pjs/>c^^-’ U7tc/y^s^^*^^^ lyti C'} -f oax -A^* ^^ax- /f^ ^ / ^ /?Uo CAi*^ M • « it * n . * ¥ m ■'^v ^ l> vU •- »♦ # .«i j' i'. ■.• • 's'i V J M» PSB^ ,. * ■/ / ?/ / - / S' r" 0 t n-:i'^1^. ^ : i^'- i lH«.' vv^ jr • •i ^ .^>:j~P>^. r-l-.' u •1?nT t f <■ f i. Qv-.>. P' <5 l^Ti 1.^41^J4 J • " uoo' - -■i ►if' 'Iw ^ » % <' J !«lif H4^f. t i *:y (^) pkjb^cffcC^ ^4.:o 3 1 I t ^v» ■ 1 -53-------r-f i 5 E——1 11 •• J ; "• \ ^/v^CVItfWJ 6<»^P v7 I Miiic^ -J^-,vV-: , r j W! ■|#f%r 'mm. •V V- ,'V' J ! d ^ ..‘I r' ; rj i'. m * ■. ■■; .'•/ ^'w' " V ^ • ¥' ; ♦ 019. J .. < . >’•- r^iiS J ■ *:■ II, > ^1 5^- * 0^ *■ V' ^ »- t ^ Ifef m'SL -ili I I. ,*. I ) t ,*v ■f- #L? fj '•*1 I Ivill ■«J *il • «r* ■.A "I *•« , I ■u - -I M j ^1 '/» I I ■a:'i S31II.4TOsfwamtMayor ami City CouncilMark Barnhardaon, City kdniniatratc^fDimit Hay 25, 19S8SQBi^liCTt Xoning Ordinance IkaafidBcnt >- Sign Ordinance &itecbeent$ A. Xoning Ordinance Chapter IB.XI B. Prop<»ed Draft Language I5S01 - Deterelnation an to whether the Council vanta to refer IfielTraft language in Attachavnt B to the Planning Coeaaiaslon Cot conalderatlon and changes in the sign ordinance. lIlTBOWJCTXOfl - A review of the toning ordinance, as it relates to ilg na, k a a a h ow n it haa a nuaber of weakneaaea. Two of theae weakneaaea recently of concern are the typea of aigna that are allowed in reaidential areas together with the length of teaporary signs. While there is a 90 day perait^ippl icanta can continue to have 90 day peraita without any liait as to how often a perait can be renewed. DISCOSSI^OH - As a result of the issues raised in the toning ordrrnance chapter the following draft language haa been prepared to address the two issues above plus other related issues in the toning chapter at this point. It is recoBnended that the aaaplea attached also be reviewed in the context of this draft language to see if there are other issues that Planning CoaMission would like to consider in amending the sign ordinance. ALTBBMATIVES - 1. Refer to the Planning Commission. 2. Aaend and refer. 3. Table. 4. Take no action ^COMMENDATION - It is recCTanended that this be referred to the Planning Comalssion for them to undertake the necessary ordinance aaendments applicable to signs for their review and recommendation. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that Attachment B be referred to the Planning Coamission for their review and recoaimendation. Ayes , Nays * IS.i •f 1.-4 - — V. % J r) r! «I I % % • ■ i: \ «l 'ii^^<1 i 'T ■m I mi k. ■i %' •, ;*• i^r . 4 %% \ ' I !H 4 \ !i j : ♦>1 ■ 1 4 4 1 r II ^ S 10.«1Km On Rl9ht“Of-Way. Private signs ar« prohibitwt] within the public right-of-way or caseaents eacept i».at tne Council *ay grant a conditional use perelt to locate signs and decorations on or within the right-of-way under their jurisdiction for a specified tlM not to eiceed ninety days.8. Plashing. Illuninated flashing signs shall not be persiitted in any district. C. beans. Xlluwinated signs or devices giving off an interaittent, steady or rotating beaa consisting of a collection or concentration of rays of light shall not be pernitted in any district. ' D. Sales Signs. Por purpose of selling, renting or leasing property, a sign not In excess of ten sguaro feet per surface nay be placed within the front ya» d of such property to be sold or leased. Such signs shall not be less than fifteen feet fron the right-of-way line unless flat against the structure. Por the purpose of selling or proeoting a residential project of sis or Bore dwelling units, one sign not to exceed 40 square feeti a coBBercial area of three acres or laore, or an industrial acrea of ten acrea or wore, one sign not to exceed 96 feet of advertising surface nay be erected upon the project site. Such sign shall not rsBSin after 90% of the project is enveloped. B. Existing Signs. Signs existing on Septenber 14, 1967 which do not conforn to the regulations are a non-conforninouse. P* Traffic Interference. No sign nay be erected that, by reason of position, shape or color would interfere in any way with the proper functioning or purpose of a traffic sign or signal. G. Building Wall Signs. Signs shall not be painted directly on the outside wall ot a building. Signs shall not be painted on a fence, rocks or sinilar structure or feature in any district. Paper and sinilar signs shall not be attached directly to a building wall by an adhesive or similar means. Signs shall be considered as a structure or fastened to another structure. H. Temporary Signs. There shall be no more than one temporary (three months or less) sign in any required yard area, and there shall be no more than three such signs on any lot, and the total area of such signs shall not exceed 25 square feet. I. Election Signs. Election signs are permitted on private property in any district provided such signs are removed within thirty days following the election as related to the signs., No election sign shall be permitted in any "R" District sooner than two months preceding the election relating to the sign. ORONO CC 380 (4-1-84) % % 11 j .1,.: ’■ . t.- f . : BT- 0 f' ■Jtv ■■ # •4 l|'> ^ ^ ^ * • ■>■’'' '-t - ., if. i '. . ) 6M8.4Ail OKDliAiCB AMEiDlBG SECflOl tO, li*«l _AtR>PT*f* AFilL I# If 14, AITO BfflTlJ® *8FKIAlt PiOfISIQI®Th« city Council of the City of Orono ordelnitsection If.61 edopted April I, lfl4 end entitled ^Special Proelslone* It emended to reedsSubd• I.A. on mqht-of-iey. Private elfne ere prohibited within the public rlfht-of-wey or eeeeoente e.cept that the Council may grant a conditional ute permit to locate algna and decorations on or within the right-of-way 111 iurlsdlctlon for a specified time not to esceed ninety dayi. TO conditional use permit for such a algn shall be lasued by the Council If • conditional use permit or temporary sign permit had been issued in the previous 24 months to that property. g. Temporary Signs. There shall be no more than NO such permit shall be issued by the City If a conditional use permit under Sub-paragraph A of this Subdivision or a temporary Sign permit under this sub-paragraph had been previous 24 months to that property, io such signs shall be allowed in residential tones. This ordinance becomes effective from and after Its passage and publication on _ _ _ __ _ __—...i.—If88* Jaies R. Grabet. Mayor ATTEST: DorotKy M. HalXln r cTty cTerk ( •tiP an V <1.' — ♦■,SV J u: ■i . * *. / I\ f i >1 1 V, Tl i m4 Affidavit of PtdtftomUooM HqIni . b«mg duly »wom on ootn say« wi •otf iho Twmw^fm kvatm m THE LA^-EBi Mould. !*► rwoota. and has M or th« vrfuch vtMidod !aio» A j Th« nowspacw h33 cornoiod «ith arf tfw ra«Mr«> rrmiOi eemtmmo quaifirifioni •* • moifiiil nr«so«Mr. m qroMdod Oy Unnwou awuio 331A 02. 331A 07. md oom pirfirrfitu Mwo. m am«dsd 8» Tho printod '^9*^x9^ wDtch io mmaxto fiftt. t: dayof 7^^ thoro^or pr«it«<f«nd |Mbl<fl>td f»ory . 19 Monday, to and inciudng MoncMy. day of AuthorUad Ao«ril Si^>scr8>od and awofn to mo on tNa ^ . 19 - H « t. M - ■ - »r ia» »\jc-iictf4rsf Public r;u»%t«tx'.ts‘»v ■■9^. V j-ruMauaMbovA Hal# {1 ) tourist ctasalfied raft paid by commercial uiefi for ciSTfpafa* bie apace S4 per inch (2) Manimum rale allowed by law for above matter $4 54 per mch (3) Rate actually charged for above aiatter S4 54 per ir>ch Each additional auocesalve waak 53 03 par inch >^1 J FfAnmS ORMNIS5IOB HUflK HOHiMr, jvis !•• ifta 7s«« p,m>riL*• I1275veil. BBFUtSBlfATlVl - Earb«ra Fvtcrson« I PUBLIC BBAKIBC 1. 7t0O |i.M. 11301 David L. Bhita t Fradrlcfc C. Wtil180 north Shore Drive Meet - Class 3 Freliainary Sobdivision 2. fjOO p«. iQcinu Anendeent - Signage 3. 9tlS (.■. S^ing Asendeent - Fences ACnOR 1TB0 Gene ft Catherine Scanlon. 2813 Casco Point Road Conditional Use Perait t Variance - Third Review Gary Roderick Construction. 1749 North Fam Road Variance - Second Review Referred Back to Planning Cocsiaission by Staff Conditional Use Penoit > Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Variance - Public Hearing Variance - Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing 4.• 1207 5.• 1286 6.• 1291 7.• 1300 8.• 1302 9.•1303 10.#1304 11.• 1305 12.•1306 13.#1307 14.#1308 Conditional use Permit - Public Hearing Variance - Public Hearing Variance * Public Hearing UV 8K1TBCH FLAN RBVIBH 15. City of Orono - Plan for Bike/Hiking Trails - Park Commission - Bob Rost John Gerhardson ADDITIONAL ITBHS 16. Planning Commission approval of June 20. 1988 liinutes. 17. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the August 8. 1988 Council Meeting. ADJOURl M J 7-- A. ■X’ - ■ ■: Syk -. X i ! i « j -r ' «V I Tot i ‘ ' I i Fro«*Dates8«bjt Flanninq CcaasitBion Chair»an lelloy L*tTiSinm‘r“or«:iS:r;.onMichael p. caffren, »aat. Hannlna a tonln, fttolniattator July 14. IM#.1301 Pavld .no PradarlclL Wilta, 100 Itorth Shore Drive «aat - ^reU-SlIrT SoMlel.lor- ^.bUc Bearloo .. .4— aeoucat for Subdlvlalon of 10 acre .parcel l«to teo J acre Kri“a“lV?o t*. "aS^* oJlYot of approal-atelT !• .«*•• ,0.10, Olatrlct - «-l. Si«,l. *«»> M.ld«.tlal. 3 acre o»a«ef.d. jSmt of mbits -* A ** Application I - VrUem comer-. Hat - !*»*•* *"■ D - Proposed Plat * : o1 ?r*^?l2!Srr"KU :??h staff .Cotatlona G - Staff Conceptual Sketches lepttidiBQ Pertinent 1.dry MIILDASLB WBfUMD Lot 1 Lot 2 Out Lot A 2.006 AC 3.0S7 9.402 0.99S AC 1.721 Total Parcel Excluding Roads 14.495 2.719 total 3.004 AC 4at0i 9e402 11.214 2. hot. 1 contain. tMtirf to^the*Mtrth"of tba"a»i»JiJ3 drainfi^l<5* An alternate site ha . Yhe existing trench drainfield r.-.rrto‘‘b:“irc‘t*i/nYn,- :h*.-‘^pr.i :;s near future. 0.V-. r.a>*i inlnarv plat, was deternined by the Proposed Lot 2, as shown on t p ^ contain suitable sites for septic applicant's site evaluator j-immanded that an additional area frw#systems. The site evaluator has "com^nded th^^^ proposed area comprises proposed outlot A be r* . . acres. Staff concurs approximately 1.3 Ar 2 aa it is currently proposed, has ai&.r.r/\“rtartuTiVivr .daition.i Appplleant haa agreed to this revision. Th. .Applicants have provld.d a.ptic t.atln, within th. propoaed Outlot A. 4 J § 4 nJI staff would note that if applicants* intent is to build a house within the Zone Pile 11301 July 14, 19I0 Page leo of Pour i-'i. ~ ^large parcel, it should not be designated as an outlet but as a separate lot that is large enough to be potentially divided in the future. Conceptually, an outlet is only designated when a parcel is intended to not be used until further developed. Staff would note that all of the sites tested on the property require SK>und systess. This is net unusual considering the Kilkenny loaa*‘type soil located in this area of Orono. 3. Mote the 'gerryaandered* configuration of proposed Lot 2. It is staff's understanding that this configuration caae about because the applicants are c^i^elled through a Court Order to sell a 2'-acre parcel to Donald and Judy Keapf as a result of a Purchase kgreeaent entered into by Kenpfs and Whites in 1964. You will note that Lot 1 just barely contains 2 acres of dry, buildable land. Staff has drawn in the building envelope for Lot 2, and suggests that while there way be a feasible house location directly south of the Langert exception, a More probable and attractive building site is east of the drainfield sites tested within the 1.3 acre recoaaaended additional parcel. It would seen to staff that the east/west line between Lots 1 and 2 could be straightened out to provide a nore useful potential secondary alternate drainfield site for Lot 1, while still leaving a plus-*or~ainus 150 foot wide corridor to the rear for Lot 2. 4. The applicants have not provided a topographic nap of the property. The topographic section of the USGS Maps is of a scale that it has little value in discussions of the development of this property. Based on the fact that the property contains a significant area of wetlands, staff feels that it is approp&iate for Planning CoasBission to require that a topographic map of the entire property be provided. 5. In Exhibits G, 1 through 3, you are provided with a plat eap sketch showing existing development in the area, showing the proposed division and the probable future request for development of Outlot A without the need for an interior road, and finally a conceptual diagram of how the areas to the east of County Road 19, south of Bayside Road and north of North Arm Drive West will likely develop under the 2*>acre standard. Given the existing developments along North Arm Drive West, staff would see North Arm Lane extending northward and then vest to County Road 19, with the outlot road being taken from properties on either side. It probably is not feasible to ask for dedication of roadway south of the existing White house, since it is only 45* north of the existing side 1 t line. Staff would also anticipate a northerly extension up to Baylde Road that would allow 2 acre lot development on either side of it. Looking at exhibit G-3, the question becomes, is there a need to dedicate property within the currently proposed plat for future access? s Summary of Issues - 1. The north lot line of proposed Lot 2 is intended by the applicant J X* % - ZOM rile *1301 July 14, 1988 Page Three of Four_ *» 1KA 9lAsvino sbou^ 4»5 drv, hulIdabl® acre# within lotr. ■?:.%r;n\h\VcVTfV,u^VtYoT*^ 2 wLl/’not b. furth.,uid.r the ?wo acre on.ee.r.d .onlh,. « feotdiacuae whether a lot width variance aa eeatored at the 50 foot aethacafrom County Road 19 ia appropriate, and ahould diacuas whether .i™/w^ llnrbetween LotS 1 and 2 ahould be atraightened out rather thangerryauindered, aa in currently propoaed. 2. I a Outlet A Intended for infiediate irt*- or ia it atrictlY to be held for a future aubdlvialon? If it ia UiU to' be suMivided in the future, what thi? Planning Coeeiaaion feel would be eoat appropriate? ®ivan that detereinatLn, ia there any need to dedicate future acceaaea with the current anbdiviaion? 3. topographic oap »aa not proT. laO. la a topographic nap critical to thia Subdivision Application? Diacusaioa - The tested drainfield sites and proposed building site on the Iso lUt or .Vra aa.t of County »oad 19. m walking to the * around the north end of the wetland, it was apparent property have been used aa a dueping ground for ?n^^^ h®«t thina that could happen to thia property would be development into a acre lota with subsequent individual owners cleaning up the ?o^ th^record, .taff would note that «oat of the junk on the property will nave to be hauled out and not buried on the site. Tiitawiae vou will note the excessive aeount of outside storage on the property,'including vehicles and building eateria^. The r«t«l, but upon cowpl.tloo of the » ?Sr?S« to « now own.r, .nd pre.uwably the .tor.ge *‘Vh. or^rV; to .« thi coBoaenti If you plan to walk to the rear of the building »lto for lot 2, thore 1. a ^thwayOf the wetland and it was dry the day I walked it, but wear your hiki g boots. Staff Ksc o—andatloo ~ staff would recoBBBend approval of this subdivision, aubje^ to Afthr issued “ted above. If Planning Coaeission does recoeeend nraliminarv plat approval based upon the propoaed configuration or one SJSilar to it, such'^a^^ for approval ahould incorporate the following conditions: . 1. Payment of appropriate park fee for Lot 2. 2. Place specific stipulations on Out lot A \**® is being approved as an outlot rather than as a separate Lot 3. f t.Mis:.a- r/t * f ^4 J ■■ii I Mv, ■ y-», ■ V ' J k . V ' - ' fSst ' .. *' '-'/t • t toning rile fUdl July 14, 19t0 Pagn Poor of Pour3. Crating of a Coniarvatioo and Plovaga EAtmnt over th« vatland111 lotk 1 HIM 2.4. Granting of th« apprc^rlata drainaga and utility easanents alongall property lines. ^Conaldar the probable request by Bannepin County for additional right-of-way width along County Road 19. statewent regarding the Citys position on the future access to these properties. '(• i cm OP 0«»0 - S0BDIV18KW APPL1C8' l^CffBBTX bOCATIOH Sit* hddfBl^O NOfi Th OR. lJ n J 1——- J; Property Identification Suaber (P.I.D.) - Hi -Z % 'X^ Please check on© - Property _ _ abstract or X* torrens? OOO^ Attach legal description to application. 4 ^ omnoi (if different than applicant) APmCAIIT p^Lf/o^. cJ HfTt^ ^ »«*• FRtramRicLM C k/HtiP Phone (hoaw) Ph<»ie (worlt} Address i P^U/CS citvt Roeejs ^*iio, »07¥ Phone (hoiB©} Name Phone (work) Address: (attach list if more than one) mSTIHG LAND USB City:tip: MiUBber of Tax Parcels Development Sis© /lit :;f ci^cio /2 w I i:l Present Ds© (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Bet Land Acres Total, all parcels.. ’ W M to. V ' S %I. ’ «» u ^ Residential; no. of units Other (specify)^_ _ _ _ ■ f“4v^' tClJ W:iO Present Zoning District tZ i' SS '9km PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes X" Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:} / Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (specify) I t * J ■ •>1 '■¥ * ^ Mil1.2.3. 4. S. C© cct toi 1. 2; 3. 4. 5. Ce Zo PB Th re PI fu AE P] t) rc ur at Oi 0% » MIBIMUM MAfBIIAt WKESSWTf »01 OOMFLBTB PHH*THIIIWn' ^FftlC^TlOM 1. C<3«ipl«t»d Application Form ^ Obtain^ vith proportf ownor* li»t>. ^ 5. At an addendum to thlt application, ploaso attach a separate lift of any other pertcna you wish notified of this application. Certification by Xoning Departaent that Prelioinary Plat Application it coi^lete. n**.. v toning Official's Signafurc__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _-_ _ _^ T. Pawnt of fees (park fees, filing fee, swr and water aaietaaenta). 2; Signed certificate of survey or aylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Baseaents, Covenants# etc. j/.y 5. Developers Agree»ent and Letter of Credit. ^ ^7 'i J Certification by toning Departsient tJ^t Final Plot Application is complete, y Zoning Official's Signature ^ , t _>_ “* * * /fIPBBS ‘ ft-Sketch Plan Review (Class I# II i III) 1150.00 i CZ5^g*.oo Preliminary Review (Class I 4 II Subdivision)250.00 Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) ^* 20.Q0/LQt Pinal Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney# Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's signature g- o.t. c/s *8 Signature ^0 Date Co C /S' BOwner Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Conunission Meetings are nela o” the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Conunission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. §-:■ V * i . S ' in I* I 9H vA;; ^Rnil> *). 3i^fi 'lEsb 0ffin5. lj^\! May 3t, [989 55 TENTH AVTNUl SCnmi SECOND FIOORHOPKINS, MN 1534) <612)933-5151 Frederick C. White 14195 PmI Drive Rogers, Hit. 55374 #1 1 Re: Donald Keapff et el v. Devid L. While) et el Our Pile; 85-959 Dear Fred: In fficcordaitce vlth our eoayersaUon, I me proridinf you vlth the eleaente of the cettleaent agreeewnt that waa entered into the court record before Judge Jamee Roger* on May 9th oi 1M8. The following are the teroui of the egreesBent; U The White* %rould provide an approved plat of the property within ail oontha from the data the acreement. 2. The Whitee would convey a hrt on which the house was situated that contained a minimtai of three acres and approved by the City. 3. The purchaee price tor the parcel described above would be $85,000.00. The terae would be Sh(XX).00 earneat oionay, which haa been paid; $9,000.00 at cloeing; and a Contract for Deed bearing interest at the rat* ot lOX per annum, due and payable in full four years after the date of cloeing. Paymenta on the contract would be at the rate of $650.00 per month. 4. The Kempfe would pay their pro rata shmre of taxea on the lot transferred to them, and the Whitea wcMild pay the differential between the homestead and non-hoamsteed taxee. The Kempfs would apply for tuneestead immediately after cloeing. If you need further verification of this agreement, please have* a representative of the City contact I have enclosed a statement with regard to attorney fees, as a separate attachment. This statement is in accordancs with our conversation* s Please-call if there is_any additional question. Yours very 7uly, | J x RONALD J. SS P.A. nald J. Johnson RJJ:sej pnri. v>^- Hi 0* r J i. ■ f .r V V ■ i ' '\ # ✓ 4 ^■v AT A . * ' A A ) f ?|ir-i^mi *32 ? 4. : ► «■• ?if * iis 8 «« I m>*m I8 i ^3 8 r» fc* • r •Nl III* C ^ * 23fiS§^igSiSs 8 ir- 8 oo N» aoo I'MII:H!»rt ^ 9 M V * HI •- nhiz i a--**ii'- H ft» li «• «H ^ 9 •• Ja:« 8 8 i;i S2^i3 S « H IS s ®5i:s"risa ^ ^01ii m m n o m < m I M 8 llli i®iiis^r a s H ¥ a M a * 8^i»li!1» tk •| .i|! sill >i>i 8 f Im m i C ® ^^-s**s ?5.g i sgj-Sf *sS3g V* 8 P P»s- -a 8a 8 gssraaa << < •» |ii" 1 sisaSISri{ •- I sa:Hp j?:i«P P , ?i «W P P r* p ^ SStp’^^ W H P §a m p p p p P P M p "8*8 *1 8 P4a 4M _ 8 23 8 M M ta i=l 8f 1 m X mm CkS *5: as ]^83 V -la Si 1*S p m Ba a pIa 8 i 88 S3S» 8 8 S« S3 T ■*8S S3 5a =!Sa m ^ £8 3 P P ■ wr- . f . -’ '4 ■ ,,■»■ m M A i* r/! I i. i • f J M >Vii^ JtlL I 2S68niy_____ Wl t’/M C - J w r- .. » ^ - ------------------------- ^7^'2iLv,tcJtL "PTii/. ^o r 1____ I PV ♦ . *'N# ♦ ■/ :. if \l ■ 1m V- ,>1 'V /. •/ # .#•; V K « J ((i IIs & k** ! "s \ % • I \ fo' 4 k / V' *• W '4 id * J mm /I i.«IC% &.IM » ♦^ 4 '•fc. / 1H ■"\ 1i^'"Nr A 9 1 ol:__ // /•)• a I ♦ > J # * f I. t;. : ( i t r-ujo' - j Bi -MA ♦ A ■^1 «» iV 4i r . • j It -I V * k SI .■^4-i-I i$..i ^ ' ’i! , J M 1 t- r.. . 5318S.6TO:Mayor antS City Council Hart •♦rnhardion. City Md»lniatrat<||J7 OUTV: May 25, 19tl SUBt^KT: loninf Ordinanca Aaendacnt - Slqn Ordinafica Attachmants fonlng ordlnanca Chaptar lf.«l B. Propoaad Draft Languaga ISStTB - oa tar* I nation aa to whathar tha Council tha'draft languaga In Attachment B to tha Planning Comlaalon lot eonaidaration and changaa *n tha algn ordinanca. IITPROOOCT’^OH - A rev law of tha zoning ordinanca, as It ralataa to iIgni'~T»afc"*hown it has a nu*ber of waatnaaaaa. Two o* waaknaasat recently of concar.. are the . allowed in raaldential areas togathar with t*'® , teaporary signs. Mhlla there Is a 90 day paralt^applicants can continue to have day parnits without any I l«lt as to how often a permit can be renewed. Discussion - As a result of the Issues raised orJrna*nce“chaptar tha following draft language has to address tha two Issues above plus other related isauaa In the soninq chapter at this point. It is reca**endad that the samples attached also be reviewed in the contest of this draft language to set if there are other issues that Planning Co**lsslon would like to consider In amending tha sign ordinanca. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Refer to the Planning CoBBtiission. 2. Ameisl and refer. 3. Table. 4. Take no action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that this be ^® pli^nFng^C^rssion for them to undertake the "®c®8sary ordinance amendments applicable to signs for their review and recommendation. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by__, that ? be referred to the planning Commission for their review ana recommendation. Ayes __, Nays __. z. f]'.. - i ' 1 J ; ^ V \(n ij*'I«. r II i « I Vt!1 I f I! i J I.. 1 Pil\ *^i:t|4 ’I'» » «< )}. * I ^V I !1 4 1 1< \: ‘ « <1 \ 5 ' f 1. S 10.ila. On Right-Of-Way. Private signs are prohibited vlthin the public right-of-way or easeaents e«cept that the Cou^il say grant a conditional use peralt to locate signs and decorations on or within the right-of-way under their Jurisdiction tor s specified tlae iw>t to esceed ninety days. B. Plashing. Xllunlnated flashing signs shall not be persltted In any district. C. Beans. Illualnated signs or devices giving off an Intern I ttent, steady or rotating beas consisting of • or concentration of rays of light shall not be peraltted In any dlstclet. D. Sales Signs, for pupo** selling, renting or leasing property, a sign not In excess of ten square •ut(M« «.y b. pl.c.d .Ithln th. (tont y«d ot »tch sold or leased. Such signs shall not be less than fifteen feet fros the right-of-way line urless flat against the structure, for the purpose of selling or promoting a residential project of si* or nort dwelling units, one sign not to exceed 48 square feeti a coaaercial area of three acres or sore, or an ten acres or acre, one sign not to exceed 96 feet of surface aay be erected up<w» the projecc site. Such sign shall not remain after 90% of the project is developed. E. Existing Signs. Signs existing on September 14, 1967 which do not conform to the regulations are a non-conforming use. f. Traffic Interference. No sign may be erected that, by reason of position, shape ot color would way with the proper functioning or purpose of a traffic sign or signal. G. Building Wall Signs. Signs shall not be painted directly on the outside wall of a building. Signs shall °® palnttd on ■ f.nc, rock, ot .UlUt sttuctute district. P.pst and atallar signs shall not be attach.d dlrsctly to a building wall by an adhesive or slr.llar means. Signs shall be considered as a structure or fastened to another structure. H. Temporary Signs. There shall be no wore ^^*2 one temporary (three months or less) sign in any require area, end there shall be no more than three such signs on any lot, and the total area of such signs shall not exceed 25 square teet. I. Election Signs. Election signs are permitted on private property in any district provided are remov within thirty days following the election as related NO election sign shall be permitted in any "R" District sooner than two months preceding the election relating to the sign. ORONO CC 380 (4-1-84) A 1 * J 6S68.4 i ■ f •K ’ r' ■t AH ORDIHAHCE AIIEHDlIK* SHCTXOH_TO. 19.CI AHIL If If§4, AHO BHTITUS) •SPECIAL PHOVISI $’i L"Tti« City Council of th« City of Orono ordains: Section If.61 adopted April 1# IfM end entitled •special Proviaioo:** it aaended to read: Subd. !• A. on Plght-of-Hay. Prleate signs are prohibited within the public right-of-way or easeeents escept that the Council eay grant a conditional use perait to locate signs and decorations on or within the right-of-way under their jurisdiction for a specified tlee not to exceed ninety days. Mo conditional use perait for such a sign ihall be issued by the council if a conditional use perait or teaporary sign perait had been Issued in the previous 24 sK>nths to that property. H. Teaporary Signs. There shall be no sore than one teaporary (three aonths or less) sign in any required yard area, and there shall be no aore than th ee such signs on any lot, and the total area of such signs shall not exceed 25 square feet. Such signs require a temporary sign perait froa the City. NO such perait shall be issued by the City if a conditional use perait under Sub-paragraph A of this Subdivision or a teaporary sign perait under this sub-paragraph had been issued in the previous 24 aonths to that property. Mo such signs shall be allowed in residential zones. This ordinance becoaes effective froa and after Its passage and publication on--------------------------------• Jaaes^RT crabeK, Mayor ATTEST: DorotFy M. Hallln, city“clerk ■ t ' I •V^I 1 ^ J .• f.". ' f v-M \r -a- KTW* M i ' ,* ■'s',/* f‘. 1^ ‘i .HI ‘I* iI•' %* Afndtvit o# IN#d«ctfl®#iStat* of fcSnnoo«4. Coup^ of HiKiropin BS Hoiro bomo ®*xFfi. op oott' **f» tf'o* f* • m auttwniod agort and erployoo of pu60a#>o» JIT I I II iiTfr------------------**"*** ^'*** ^ ntaofa. and haa hiH hnowfodd* of me faca wfiicfi «• •tatod botow A» R®nii conomutmQ nrwsov;^. as 331A 02. 331 A or amonded HiaffTr ii^'-—r a* • quatfied b Sl2tUt« «id odw ap{»!«atA« ««s. as 0 ) ThO cwtod "ZV^l*^ ^9^^ M^fC. wtticb l3 attacfwd woo cut from tho cobanno of soid and oao pnnfd and poblofwd onco ooch for _ auccos swo wooM:I tt was f?si pi«)»t^^>od Monday. the day of T^k ___'*® ^ and was thweaftar prnled'and pubfiohod ovary Monday, to and Inciudtng Monday, day of 19 Authwmd Agent Subscribed and sworn to mo on this 4 ctev of Tva/i By;_. . 19 UU^ y (^•ft ar tmm W I ^ } nO#- • •>< date bifermalloo (1) LowMl claMitied ral* paid ty convntffcia uean tor compara- bl« fir»C« $7 ®4 per mct» #2) Maximum r«le aMowed by law tor abovo matter %4 o4 per men. (3) Rate actually charged for sDove matter: $4 54 per Each additionat aucxessive week S3 03 per inch J I a I >5 Ji 4 •1 t! i IMttdt Stlbjf List 01 SCI At t! dr«fl and < In r- intdi • nui th« I Exhll Subd •ub» lang' I wc prop <*. I « 9 I 5 4 It 9ot Planning CoaMlaaiofi OiairMn Kell«y Orcmo Planning CoaMiaalon mabmrm City Ad»lnlatrator B*rnhardaon FztMt Michaail P. Caffron» Aaat Planning t Sosing Mninlatrator Ont«s July 12, 19tt Sabjnets Ordlnnnca Aaendaant - Pane* Beight, including Clarlfiad Bon- EncroachMnt Section Hording List of Bxhiblte Exhibit A ** Exhibit E - Exhibit C - Exhibit O * Exhibit E “ Exhibit F “ tMM> from Mark Bernhardaon §/14/it Proeoaed Ordinance _ Propoeed Ordinance Indicating Subatantial 1^ or Changed Exiating Ordinance with Motationa Diagram of Typical Fence Affidavit of Publication At*their**Juna 27th meeting, Counw-.! referred to the draft lanouaoe regarding an ordinance to amend the fence height re^latiya tnd^clarifyl^ warding’of tho aoo-Mcr^choont in rovlowlng th. oxintlng ordlnnnce Innguago, and »«•» ,**^**|****>!2 interpret the exiating ordinance for a number of yeara, ataff hw a number of revialona tc wording, phraaea, and punctuation in order to me the non-encroachment aection eaaier to understand. Exhibit D contains the existing non-encroachments section. Section 10.03, lSbdVv\.”lo“ » r'through r. Exhibit o al.o subsection the existing language ends up in under the new ordinance language. I would make the following comments regarding the ehangea that are proposed t 1. Subdivi.lon 15 (A), *hlch d.»ctlb.. tytanm ‘h** «• a house that are allowed to extend up to -^*1^J^5*”thZtyard area, is made more succinct, in that language is added prohibits these encroachments when the structure ine^"o/^eint^ into the required yard. The off-street parking which does not relate to features attached to a house, is made a separate subsection. Subdivision 15 (B). 2. Likewise, nameplate signs for one family ^ ^subdivision 15 (C) and the lighting non-encroach^nt becw Subdivision 15 (D). Punctuation is slightly changed to make this more readable. 3. Subdivision 15 (C) is split op into new a Whereas platform-type structures currently are allowed to J distance of not less than 2 feet from any lot line in any yA>^J» staff IS suggesting that that be clanged to a d foot minimum setback, since t I J \i ! I i. i 4•V I fI ft« I ! Ordinance ajj^ndeent ~ Fence Height Page 2 of 3we tycicelly heee e 5 foot drainage and utility eaeasnt adjacent to a lot line and each atructuree woeld seen to be a conflict over drainage and utility eaa«Mnts. Mote that ee would etill allow drivewaya and BidewalltB leBB than 5 feet froa the lot line. The eection of old 15 (C) regarding « foot high fencea along the atreat let line of lahe frontage lota on a aajor thoroughfare# ia placed in new Subdiviaion 15 (6) for a rear yard, aince by definition thoae lakeahore lota have mmflf a lakeahore yard and a rear yard. 4. Subdiviaion 15 CD) ia aplit up into new aubaectiona (F) and (X). The language regarding the eaception for lakeahore lota in old aubaection (D) waa# in ataff'a opinion, not interpretable, and haa been changed to aay enactly what waa eeant by the Council when that aection waa approved and aa it haa been interpreted by ataff aince ita adoption. 5. Exiating Subdiviaion 15 (B) ia reviaed to becoM Subsection CO, and now includes the language regarding 6 foot fences for lakeahore lota on major ttwroughtares. d. Subdiviaion 15 (F) becoass new Subdivision 15 (1). 7. The proposed language allowing rail-type fences in any lection where a 3-1/2 foot fence is normally allowed, becomes Subdivision 15 (J). Discussions at recent City Council meetings with various mei^rs of the public have resulted in this Council directive to consider allowing rail-type fences to ex<»ed 3-1/2 feet in height, moat of then historically constructed and ncm being constructed excoM that height. The intent of the proposed wording ia to only when they meet certain opaqueness standards, the idea being that a fence one can see through is much leas obtrusive than a coi^lately opaque screening fence, and will be in character with the City a rural philoac^hy. The proposed ordinance language limits the heights of poets and rails, aa well as providing for a minimum post spacing and a maximum fence opacity of 33%. Diagrams in Exhibit 1 show a 3-rail and 4-rall <MDce that would just meet the 33% opacities (or 33% light blockage). That diagram also shows other types of l>oard fences and cyclone fence vhlch are not considered aa "rail fences" and which would not be allowed under this subsection. Obviously a stockade fence and horiaontal and vertical board fences would not meet the opacity requirement. a cyclone fence on the other hand, might meet the opacity standard but would not meet the definition of a rail fence, and it impression that cyclone fences in excess of 3-1/2 feet in height in front yards is not what the City wants. Definitions of opacity, post height, post, top rail height, and Tail have l>een included to siinisiise ailsinterpretations of what ia meant by those trrms. r f / ^ # j.* ,I .-J li-' r 0- I H . J ■ V I* f J . *-Jh 1 1 •*'V *Kf •• i# » • % w t / 1 t1 ‘i i i i ' 1 Ordiaanca hmmndmmnt - fmncm Pag* 1 of 3this ordinance la adopted, the first heing a split rail, nataral finish (or no finish) fence, th* second being the white post and horisontal board fence typical of *harss country*. Can Planning Coeaiissioo think of any ether fences which eight resnlt free interpretation! of the wording of this sectionT Staff —-----------------subject to any rewisions Planning CoMiissioa feels are appropriate, staff recosMeads approval of the revised non-encroscheent* section, which includes organisation and punctuation changes, changes the platfom structure setback free a lot line froe 2 feet to 5 feet and allows rail* type fences to exceed 2-1/2 feet in height under certain perforaanee standards. This is a public hearing, and any cosnents from the public should be considered. 1 i *1 1 ‘ % { J t j I*i I t1 « I 1 4 t f' 1 i 61488.7fOsmON; OATS: llsyor And City Councilftork. BccnhardsoA, City Adainistrat June 14, 1968 o?/eMt.A SOSJlCft Ordinane* Aa«ndeent - Pane* Height IncltKles Clarified Hon-tncroachaant Sactioa tfordiagi jittachMnts:A. Draft Langoage Regarding *!on*>CiiccQachs«nt section (If.83 Subd 19> B. Draft With Changes Circled C. Baiatii^ Ordinance with Hotatlofts 0. Sketch ISSUE - Preaentatirw of draft language regarding fence regulation ar^~r*lated •cleanup* of ncm-encroachaent sections to deteraine If Council desires to refer this to Planningi Coaiaalon for their consideration. IHTIWWICTIWI - In response to Hr. Hollander’s request the Council 3i'ricT*a"arthe June 13, 1988 eeeting that the staff bring bach to Council draft language regarding an aeendaent to the City’s fence ordinance. Discussion - Given the difficulty of deeigning a fence ordinance to. occasions* and the uniqueness of each situation, particularly in Orono as it relates to fences, the draft language attenpts to address the issue of allowing certain open style fences to have e greater height than thoae that do not seat that openneae standard. The proposal regulates the post height, spac.ng, rail height, fence *opaquenese* (degree of light blockage) and site of rails and poets. In addition, wording and punctuation within the *non- encroacheenta* section of the cod* is slightly revised for the take of clarity and ease of Interpretation. Ho changes in substanca are presented, but the new wording will eore closeXy adhere to the Intent of past Council code changes. ALTERNATIVES 1. Refer to Planning CosBalsslon 2. Aaend and refer to Planning Coaelssion 3. Choose not to have any anendnent directed to the Planning Commiasiem from the Council regarding fences RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council refer the draft language”to the Planning Coemission for its study, thought and recoaaendation. ^ PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by*^‘ , seconded by _, that the Council refer to the Planning ConmisTTon draft language of Attachaent A Cor their consideration and Response to the Council when deened appre^rlate.^ Ayes , Nays O. cc: Planning Coemission John Hollander, 200 Hollander Road, Wayzata J " # I I 1 ¥ 1 onmnacs • • Sioow swisMl o»nyuKB wpiwc k^uj owiiw lon^l^^mBT^ffTMCTOS SKmcTiS or tlClFM. coot I Tb« city Council of OtotM ordnln® •• followii i.* «V, “"inj'tS following languor* in it* placoi S«:tlen 10.03, Sobdlvl.lon IS - ■on-«nero«ch»ent». «i« follewlno .b-n i»t hm ewiaidorod to b* •ncroachMnta on yard roqulroMn Chl»n.y., °::cS"ie.S*V;/le..V«Vn\cV."*«J«: lintala. “la.d uT«* 3S not Mt.nd oor* thon 1-1/3 *»«t Jj«i% A tbot U not locoto. within th« raqairad yard. B. off-.tr..t s.rklno In •», t.qolr.d y.rd ..c.pt •• oth.rwl.. rogulatod in th* Municipal Cod*. C. Maf* plato sign* for on« Caoily d%f*lli’*ga. D. fcUht. for i 1 lu.ln.tin, S*""*"’ ‘j:!*/J^^Voct * oor« Vf lUh? lot line. E F.neo. which do not .xc<k1 3-1/2 feot in hoiOhtI tort.w, .toj^E. r*iK^» wH*w»i «w _ -4«llar atructurea, which do not eateno uncovered porche*» at^p* or i*««i of th# principal buildingr/;,;;:."’"* ........ F. in .la. or re.t y.rd. only. b«y. ^ SS^.’fTT^f irV w^poi foot nor which •" fonMO^i^ nil* which do notwhich do not exceed a width of 3 fe«t» tencee «na w«* reaulated«e..d . h.ight of 6 feet .hove ori,in.l gr.de, except .. regui.teo hereinafter. 0. in reer y.rd only: .cc.ory .troctore. »nd bklconie., breeiewaye, v^r^"^^ft,r*^whe ouch cecreation.l equipment except l.a.t $ feet frMi a ;:«ro7 iV/er';” • .nc.*lf£rn 4n.truct.a within^. !:^::^r‘. J^^’^whith by -•?]"‘.x’^r/'dinTs^" !n-^h?iVh‘'t° i- i.S"oVtU ‘o ’LVi«r?iV f\Vi mmm Vi % #r' 4 ■ ( J Ifc'- t' 7 i A' ♦ tM9th f«nc« find fill aha 11 not crovo of 'tho road)*•acaad ( f««t above the height of theH. In aide yarda only, no acceaaory atrocture ahall10 feet fro* any aide lot line* bo fence or wall conatructed within aaide yard ahall eaceed a hei9ht of € feet above orioinal grade. Of the average lakeahore aetback* V, j* i7r “!T” i‘i vs.^ atandarda la allowed to take the place of ouch fences 1. Naxianai poa** <*eight €0 inchea. 2* Miniauai poet apacing 72 inchea* 3* Haaimai rail height SI inchea* 4* Maxina fence opacity 33%. For purpoaea of thia eection. following deflnitlona Urce^*Vf^^>p2SS2I!rirV\JJer?irpenVlcola aeaaureaient purpoaea. opacity - total width of raila divided by top rail height tinea 100* 1: r,u,. -lo- width/dianeter - • inchea* w. w ** *.4-4. r«ti4* Top rail heights ground level to higheat point of top rail. eeaaured vertically* , 4/at . aS* Sails horiaontal nenber. maxiaiua vertical width/diaaeter o inchea* Refer to Orono Manual of Deaign Standarda and Speclficationa for a diagran of fence typea which eeet thaae criteria* SBCTIOB 2. Adoption and Publication, liker^andupon adoption, and a short auaimary shall be publiahed in the Laker and Pioneer newspapers. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this by a vote of _ _ ayes and _ _ nays* ISItr Dorothy Hallin. CityClerk James Grabek. Mayor T-:.1 rnmmJ J t I.1\ . * 4 •! T i : I s i U • ■» 11 I * 4 4 '^4 1 I '-h > # •I A 1, f t ic '4 #• } 4 ♦ ' • • 4 ’1 * • •ii IS C llBCtt b.K- > 4* • ^€XM.<^t i: 11OteDlSMKl • » n>CAS ORDIIIMICB AMWY1KSsnuaMins to to Acruwowr stkoct ___■raacipjo. OM MCTIOM OP TK City Co«»cll of Orooo oraoins •• follow** SKTIMI 1. CH.Bt.» 10 of th. nunlcip.l CoOo of OroBO rmoollBf soctioo* lO.OJ, Sobdlololoo 15 A throo^h t, ooa •obotltntlii* tho foilowiftf l*»fo*po lo It* pl*c«t sr~ii:s '“ ■ rhianAva fltt**< b*lt COUr***» l**d***» *111*# |lil**t*t*» li*t*l*> orn*»*nt*l f**tur**, »och«nlc*l d*wlc**# fj*!**! aatt*r*« and tb* lib* provided th*y do notl«t*r*lly Into th* r*<|uir*d yard fro* a atructur* that 1* not ^^at^ within tha r*q«ir^ yard. _0«-o*r^tiAmn9 Jln «oy fo^olrod yord .xcopt •• oth.r»l.o ^ r#gol*t*d in th* llunici|;al Cod* H4UM plat* ai^rn* for on* f**lly dw«llin9*. 0. tuht. for lllu.ln.tln9 p.tklng “•“.'hi'dlV.ct .oorM %t ll^t prop*rty. Such light* nay b* located to within 5 f**t or tn* sr lot lin*. «. Fonc. ohich do not .red 1-1/1 f.ot in •*^9ht, t*rr.eoo, KnK%f*^S?9to^nd*‘f"ii^^ ri«lJ5*th. prlncip.l^lldll.9 r«tild to . dl.t.nc. of not 1... th.^;^..t fro. .ny lot lino. xrcvH3:'SH ‘:^id" *o7% •xcaad^a^hoight of 6 f**t above origin * l^rad*- 'axeaot ao g ^ harainaftar c. In rear yard only*<.ji*cc*iB ory *tri^turo^^d *^i^^t ^ balconi**# bre***way*,^d^cir^^iu^door . ,^ch recreational eqoipnent except a* ^ f Jit from a acceasory atructur** or equipment are locat^ .VkA* * r«Ar vard_*haXl. rear lot line. Wo fence or wall constructed within a rn#** yaJ^fl ..cod a hSloht %f*T*fUt ”abo«" oVigiM'"A iilVi'^naSVhoTeTar?-fSit InjTeiVhti* allowed within the^equ^d ^arya^^ •hAioht is #t 11 oii*araTontt thefeat in height i* allowed within fenciTliot eaiw^ in height ia allCTgeflLj Tga Si rt^^ ^ LS7r\'hor*o»;hV.r?ff mi* r." ^^u'fr'':^. J r- 'm »# (-1' i ‘ . ' ^ • • I % ? m it I V r'- # « I H •? \ w » ;i .■li • 1.-* *■+' - M i:|I 4both fohco and fill shall not excssd € f««t abovs ths haight of tho crovn of tha road).B. In sido yards only* no accessory stmeturs shall ba closor than 10 fast froa any aids lot lies, no fanes or wall constroctad within a aids yard shall aacaad a haight of « fast abowa original grads. 1. Fancas and walls axcaading 1-1/2 fast in haight aay sot ba locstad closar^to tha shoralina than tha *awsraga lakashora satback* dafinad^asjtha" svaraga distanca ffo« tha shorallliT oF-nawtstlhg Imildiags on adlacant lots. Fancas or walla of any^ight shall not ba coostmetad within 75 fast of tha shoralina, jragardlas /^f tha awaraga la)cashora satback." _______________ •3 J. In any location whara a fanc» not aaca«lii^ 3-1/2 fast in haight is noraally allowad, a rail fanes Mating tha following parforsanca standards is sllowad to taka tha placa of such fancat 1. MaxiMBi poat haight 50 inches. 2. Niniwusi post spacing 72 inches. 3. Kaxina rail iMight 54 inches. 4. Naxima fanes opacity 33%. For purposes of this section, tha following definitions applyi 1. Opacity (opaquaness)t percent of light blocked, or 100% ninus parcant of openness as viewed perpendicular to tha fanes. For piaasuranent purposes, opacity total width of rails divided by top rail haight tiMS 100. 2. Post heights original ground level to tip of post. 3. Posts vertical colusms supporting tha Irarisontal rails, Mxinsa width/disMtar - • inches. 4. Top rail heights ground level to highest point of top rail, ■easured vertically. ..... ^ -5. Rails horisontal aianber, naxinun vertical width/dianatar • i inches. Refer to Orono Manual of Design Standards and SpecificatiMS for • diegrah of fence types which Mat these criteria. _____________________ 8BCTIOB 2. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall ba affective upon adoption, and a short sunaary shall ba published in the Itskar and Pioneer newspapers. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this by a vote of ____ ayes and nays. 1988 j Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk Jams Grabak, Msyor -J ^ I i '4 % % % ; • i f Vd if: ■* 1 * • •• ! t I • (♦ ir I >- ? f 1 c ^ I' 4 ' ,V; i h f Sew a: . “ £W- D .iftfV rr5 c^K*"C€T <io ^./i-e#V Subd. 15. off-Encro*cli»ent». Th« followin^ thall not b« ooc»ld«f<^ to bo oocroochaonts oa yard req\ilrcacntst _______^ —'h, Chianoya, fla«s* bolt courns. ltao«r«, ailli*pilaatara, llntala^ ornaa«»tal fcataras, atchaolcal Javtcai, eocaicas, fattora and th# 11»». prowidad thay do not.aatand faat^^TxrtT • ____ ll9htaTor iltuaTnatlng ■aaa plata algna, for, ona faally dwallLnaai ting parlilng araaa, loading araai or yarda cor aafaty and aacurity parpbaaa* pcoaldad tha dlraet aoocca of ll^t W Doblie riobt-of-way or adlaeant raaldantiaia not alsibla froa tM pablle right-of-way or adjaeant raaldantial pfoparty aay ba loeatad to within fl% faat of tha frrait lot 11m. gwa—aannl. " " . — ■' ■' C. Pancaa which do not aicaad 3-1/2 faat in haight«l^fancaa not ITi faat fn^ hai ght along tha htrawt—tot—tioa of I aka frontaga lota which front on a na)or thoroughfara» if fill ia raqwirad, tha total eoabinad haight of both fanca and fill shall 2pt aacaad € faat abova tha haight of tha crown of tha r^^ tarcacaa»~staps. uncov atad~pdfchaa, af^pa or oTnilar itructilfaa* which do not aatand abova tha haight of tha ground floor laval of tha principal building and aitand to a diatanca of not lata than two faat froai any lot lina. _ _ c 'Tt_^ ---------------------------------------^ ___ ___________ - ' I-.......... toD. Xn aida or roar yards only, bays not to aicaad a dapth of two faat nor to contain an araa of nora than twant^ aguara faat. fira j asca^aa n«t to aicaad a width of thraa faat. farcas and wa I ls~not.^ ■to dlcaed a haight of sis faat abo^^a original ctadaSand ocan o raaf^parkl'ng/aicapr~Tor lakashbra lota, no ranca or wall ovar l«ty-lw6 Inches but not In aicasa of sovanty«two inchaa In haight abova original grada nay ba locatai cloaac to tho shoralina than tha avaraga diatanca froa tha ahoralina of aiiating raaidonca buildings on adjacont lots, such fancoa shall not ba constructad within 75 faat of tha ahoralina. Raar yard onlyi balconlaa, bcaatawaya, datachad outdoor picnic sholtara and racraational aguipaMnt aicopt as ragulatad harainaftar; no accassory atructura ahall ba cloaar than fiva faat fron a raar lot lina nor shall a fanca or wall constructad within a raar yard aicaad a haight of oil faat abova original grada. P. Sida yarda only; no accassory structura shall ba cloaar than tan faat fron any aids lot lina nor shall a fanca or wall constructad within a sida yard axcaad a height gf sis faat abova original grada. _______ / I a III A>’'1 Subd. 16. Traffic Visibility. No faicts, structurss or planting aora than thraa faat high in tha *R* District on cornar lots shall ba parnittad to obstruct traffic visibility within a triangular araa defined as followsi "Beginning at tha Intarsaction of tha projected curb Hues of two intarsactlng straats, thanca thirty faat along one curb lina thanca diagonally to a point thirty faat fron tha point of beginning on tha other curb line* thanca to tha point of beginning. ‘mm %Jr t ' i I * ! .'»5' t ’W!• ‘ ; N,K V N \\ \ \\, \V. 'A % \ \ . \ V. \• > \ \ N \ V \ y \\ •s' > \% I > 'V.: m fc'^r.'_ . •: P'-- ^ -C a mm } u I i I I .'V 5 ^ * '> 11 - V j S i '■smm ii ^ .1 ■ < • ^■■■* /y * y' f * 1 I * ^ ^ i;. fSL-Z—-= *.■■ **.'" *» 4f7ftitfWi el PvMc9tiQt9stale 0t MmmoU. Csuiity of Hwnei^. M Holm, Hwng A4y »wom. on asm says that fw ts an at^fKgtted a(^it wcl cmptoya a of the put^fw of tha iwr^Mpw leic»n ii THE LAKER Mauvl. Mav oatotiL. and has hJ tiAow^idoa ^ the f ac& Mhi^ ira A.I Tha n««aaapar has eoffiptisd sAn it iha raouira* manta <»nsfAuhno quatricationa aa a quafifiad flMMBMCf M SfOVidSd t>V SlUllJt# 331A 02. 331A 07. and other appBcabia laaa. aa B.| Tha prmiad which ia attached waa cut from tha cohanna of aaid rwwspapar. and waa pnr^ad and puMshad once each weeh for . . eiRxestive wecfesc tl W9st trat putitiahad Mviday. tha . . V day of aral waa thereafter prirtted Monday, to and bKJuing Monday __19^/7!^ ad ara ev«y tha - da y ol ____19 Authorfaad Ag«tt Subacribad and sworn to ma on tnis ___^. day of___w/i^X______ By:__. INSt^a^fHwwkfttsiwfcaS.*^ .CHwiMkn fiakw taia 3. Hats Intomutlon (1) Lowest classitieO rate paid by conunarciat usefs tor compara- t>^ spao! S^-64 p#f if>cli. (2) Maximum rala allowad by law for above mefter: $4.64 per inch. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $4 54 per inch Each additional succetaive week: $3 03 pei inch ! j -I j ■ ii V •i * • i‘" %y 1 n I 4 If •. I TBS Planning Coaniation Chalrsan Kallay Ot<mo Planning Coaaiaslon Wafttbara City AdBiniatrator Bamhard'ton Jaanna A. KabaatYit t Z'^r!^g MniiiiiatJratQjr imtas July 12r 1988 Mbfactt 11207 Case and Catharina Scanlon TilS Caaco Point Road * Variances -> Third Raaiair List of Adabits Bxhibit A - Planning Cosadaaion Hotica of Action 8/21/88 Exhibit B - Raaisod Survey Bxhibit C - Plan Drawing Exhibit D Elevation Bxhibit B - ADroxiaats Locaticm of Hardcover to bo BMOVSd Bxhibit F - Jacobs Kano Bsvisv of Vsrli i.l*L i fton^t by Applicant 1. Section 10.22« Subdivision 1 (B) Lakaahora •atbsci for structures Raquirad ■ 75- Original Shad - 0* (75' or 100% variance) Proposed Shed •■24' (51* or 68% variance) Original Daclc • 15* <60' or 80% variance) Proposed Dade «• 24* (51* or 68% variance) 2. Section 10.22# Subdivision 2 Laieeshora har dcover*" 0-75* setlMclc area • 4#200 . .f. Allowed « 0 s.f. Original Hardcover - 249 s.f. or 6% (210 s.f. dads# 49 s.f. shed) Proposed Hardcover ■• 165 ^.f. or 3.9% (Shed located under dec)e not includedi and stairs/safety landing of 149 s.f. excluded) 75-250' aatbac)c area 9#600 s.f. Allowed • 2#400 s.f. or 25% Existing - 4#200 s.f. or 43.7% Proposed - 4#043 s.f. or 42.1% Resoval of 150 s.f. (52.5 s.f. adjarent to access stairs at rear of house and 104.5 s.f. at northeast corner of residence# see staff slcetch Bxhibit E) Please note the 165 s.f. of additional hardcover to be removed within applicants lakeshore yard has not been included in the above calculations because they were not included in the original hardcover calculations totaling 4#200 s.f. Bsvlsw of Application At your June 20th meeting# all but one member of the Planning Commission conceptually approved the variance request of the applicant subject to their sulxaltting revised plans that clearly defined what the applicant was proposing within the guidelines of the Planning Coamlssion directives. t: j i 2- R r r. E: Ai p: 8i f] •I Tt •P PI an to I !i m * * ^ I ^r r<ming film «13Q7 Page 2 of 2Pmrlmw BKhibits C and D. not axcaad KS a.f. of The apiilicanta plana no« ahov a deck that dcaa a. The Btaira have the appropriate naeber of *^^**^* within the 12 foot Intervala. Applicant haa reduced the eaoent of additional hardcover by eeploying the gravel area of the retaining wall landlnga r«julrlng only one deck atalr 3* «• by 3* 3». in additlcait reviev Exhibit F, the building Inspector has reviewed the revised plana subailtted by the applicant and has approved thee finding that they sMet all requirenenta of the state building code. Aa the Majority of the Planning CoMMission have conceptually approved the proposed reconstruction of a dock, access stair, and shed within the •canlona lakeahore yard, staff will repeat somo of the suggested findings froH an original staff aiewo dated June 1, 1PS8 if application was to be approved. A. The applicant haa reduced hardcover with the new proposal for the inproveaents within the lakeahore yard ai^ within the 75-250* setback B. The existing structures were renoved aa a result of a severe atom that eroded the lakeahore bank and had nothing to do with the laproper maintenance of the subject structures. C. There have been no substantial changes in the code since 1575 when the LR districts and lakeahore standards were established. D. The City had approved siailar variances for the property in1970. rrj B. The steep topography requires special consideration for the residents of the property. F. The applicant’s physical lialtations as documented by his personal physician's report would prevent his full enjoyment of his lakeahore property if the deck and shed were not restored to lakeahore yard. The following conditions are also recoanended with the approval of this application: 1. Run-off from the roof of the shed must be directed away froa the grade level of the retaining wall and drained to a drainage structure already within the retaining wall substructure or via an Independent drainage tile. This will prevent any undermining of the existing retaining wall structure. 2. Plantings must be provided adjacent to each of the retaining wall levels to provide the necessary screening and ground cover atablisatior. 3. The applicant has agreed to resK>ve 157 s.f. of existing hardcover within the 75-250* setback area. Such hardcover removals must be completed by ..^ . Please advise staff if additional information is required or if you have any questions concerning the new material submitted by the applicants prior to the meeting. J •I *1 I / it' i r t i t Acm m OMR) r.o. Box ifCryxtul Bay* MB SS32»tOBIBG riu BO. 1107 aOTICB or PLABBIBQ comfiffioii JICnOB 473-7357 Data of Voti^: i/21/li t Mr. ft Nra. Com tcaoloa 2015 Caaco Boint Road Wayiata# MB 55391 nn OB ATfliXCmOBt varlaoca Cooditiofial Ota Parait GBfB m mama* f/20/tt BPfBi i Por 1 hw^inmt Blaaaiiif Oea^aaiOB rarcirniftii tBa foUoviagi Tablad for raaamia notad baloa. lOTlB MB) CTBCXJUk OOBDXTlQBSt Subaittal of raalaad plant that would radatiffi itack/ttalra to aaat tha following ataiklardtt a. Liail. dack atructura to 15 by 11 for a total of 145 ■•f. of hardcowar. __ , , b. Stair atructura to ba datlgnad to laaaao atructural i^acti 1. Stair with Mxik^rra 4* width. 2. Landing (aafaty atop, ate.) to ba liaitad to 4* by 4* - to ba placad at 12* intarvala/aactiooa. 3. Applicant »ay wiah to uaa tha flat aurfaeaa of tha rataining wall tiara to prowida tha nacaaaary landiag atopa and tha radasign of tha ataircaaa. 4. Show tha location of tha door to tha atoraga ahad undar dack. c. Applicant aay wiah to ahow propoaad landacaping along tha retaining wall tiara alao. Staff would racoaaand that your daaignar/plannar contact Tea Jaeo)« xagarding atructural daaign of tha ataircaaa. In light of tha laat two naatinga of the Planning Coa«iaaion, it nay ba halpCul to praaant alavationa o2 tha radaaign of tha dack/accaaa ataira. Pleaaa contact tha Building ft Zoning Offica if you hawa any additional guaationa. Tha application ia achadulad for tha Planning COTodLaaion aiaating of July 16, 1966; naating starta at 7:00 p.n. yha daadlina for aubaiittal of naw infomation ia July S, 1986. ir; i ¥FI» ¥ '■ ^ M* \ • \-------------- Tt... J ft,.1;itiU fi kr9m fmm h w«t^ *k«i!(^H» ^Ji IPtK i« CfliMf. - f ■ !: ■ ■ i " > > % ' d 1 ft 9m' rtTT^^ t *♦ao9i* ^ % t • »«Sa 0%ay » %• X '.W. :!••»• • : frt»«i •N»%4rr ^4.I twfviy c«rt.^» tint MiU I* • trm yK ce^ct 4111011 Of i WVOy .11 tte oPMAll th4t o*ft »f lot 129. SWlito ?•*» *•'<* •«» w slatted land ••'d that A©rtl#« ia*atfc«r* A»f«w* *acatAil litioflStTot i» STswikg fMb t** said lot prejaettf'J to taA« munetce*a. «cordi(is elAt t1>oreof 0(1 fUo or of ratwrd m mfwotota *<fticA Itas llorthi«»tor ik of * lif» rwl«9 parallel iith and diitaot 5 ^outhweiterly lliw of said Lot wd ,i» tfat»li8A* th0f» and tS‘location of aity oaistun port to %tKm Mf other tapro*e»*»ts »f ortcroaclwenu. COfFlM a GWXdKilii. IK. 17755 Engineers, land Sorreyors and Plawers lOfiQ L3ie, Himi^soti p w > » # ■\ J V : #•!ft I - — J t fti \ ‘ I J \ V •i.- ■*’ forin lot 120. SWI« PAOK HKWtpin Cowntf. NinntfOli m •'I • '.ii f' f I- ^ r ■ |:| < ■>■ fS S f ^^0Cc¥gi^ #.»r* Wit % »mm l%^*| X Q%♦#.7 % ______________________ _______________ ■ Sc^ 1^ 2 I * • D.Jia : 8-31 -87. : lrg#i •arker I fiereby certify that this is a true and correct) at ion of a surrey of the boundaries of tite descr All that part of Lot 120. SPRING PARK and a platted land and that portion of LaPeshore . lying between Lot 120 of SPRING PARK and th'j said lot projected to Lake Minnetcnla, acco plat thereof on file or of record n lK.'nnep Minnesota, which lies Northwesteriy of a li parallel with and distant 5 feet Noi ttiwoste Southwesterly liiw of said Lot and tiie exte of. and the location of any existing Dutldinfjs. It dt port to show any other improvements or encroacto COFFIN a GRONDEKC, INC. 5•»#%/.<!<^-iark 5. Gronberg Lie.'Wo. f2755‘ Ernipeers. Land Surveyors and Pl» Long Lake, Minnesota I» \ ( * Yy^ ' w-.y % i -k.. J 8i' ii';-’’ r' \ fg, JMSB* A. loiiainq » l««lo9 Aa»lia»ti«ter PMBt Cos J«cob«, Bttlliln? • Ml* ln«f»etor I iTiily Hf m® MWti 11207 20XS C««eo f»l»t *o«4__ rnvoo«l 8tor*9» A««. abO;jss.rrs."r.:^s!g-'.'s: jsrsr a E«qnlr«nBt* of tho Ototo *»1101 b« Cod*. "■tf I * ♦% ■■ :k r ■'- » ir -■m" f VJ ■ y'4'^ \ * » jr f - ,c t '^Sf:: * s:' -• . i *. t: • ■- • . »2 «» ^ ‘'V- fr4r J '•w • ' -Ti m-* - . , i ♦ ,'V' 4 . /* * t ♦ Clff 0» dlOliO r.o. Box i€ Crystal Bay, KB 5S323 fOt Cary Bodarick 770 Dlckay Lake Oriva Long Laka, MM 553S0 BOnVB rXLB SO. 12Bfi ■oncB or njuoiiBC oosaxsaxoM acnoa t73-7357 Bata of Bottcai «-•-•• COrXBS TOt TWB or aPTLXCBTioat variaoca oan or mrnKt rorst 4 Por o Against Plaaniim rr—tssicp ■ai,oa—nilB tbai followingt Oanial for raaa<ms ootad baloa V0TB8 AID 8T9CXM. OOMDXTXOaSt Nithont subatantal discussion, in tha a^sanea of tha applicant or hia raprasantatiaa. Planning Connission Yotad 4**0 to dany tha fanca haight varisnea raquast. As you and I discussad, I will ra^achadula this application for Planning CMOiission's farther raviaw at thair July II* 19M naating, at which you should ba in attandanca* ittis itaa wcmldl than Im scl^dulad for final Council acti<m on July 2S* 19tl. I an anclosing copies of tha letters racaivad frwi tha naighborlng owners* all of which express oppoaitioti to tha fence. If you desire certified copies of tha official Planning Cowission ■inutes* they are auailable from the City Bacordar after review and approval by tha Planning CoaoRission. /OCfTB • ^COiOl^i, /C<>OweS7"<^ At- 77^ J«ty /S /MearrAiCs. I S ' *:'■: * t’ ' . 'C ■ - ■ d J I ■smm . t % ' I4.w*PliBAiii^ COMBisaion Chairsan KelUy PlanAia^ Co—iaaion Mr»b«ra City MalPiatrator tornhardaooMlchaal P. Gaffron* Aaat Plaiinln^^ i Xoc1 b9 A^iniitfatot yam Hoad DHTBs flay 27# I9ii SUBJICTs §1284 Gary Rodarlck Coaatructicai Inc.* If4f Bortfi - Varianca • Public BaarisG iWBQ DXmXCTs LR-IA Sinaia Paailf Lakeahora iaaiiSantlal • 2 acraa. KPT%0 .riOB* taqueatlnq a varianca to all — 8’ tmncrn alon^ aida lot Una adiacant to tounty Road i. LIST OS smsiTSt Bxhibit A - Application Bxhibit • - Plat Map Bidiibit C________ Pr—arty fVneri List Exhibit D - Sorvay/Sita Plan 1. * ?SrSppXic«Bt i. r.qu.stin, a v.ri.Bc. th. Vo to 60 .11. p.r hour “•‘“'I ViTl^Voridl^or’S 6. i. .l.o int.ndiii* that th. ptopo».<l *•" thldUrM of .afety by k.«>in, .Mil children .Ithln th. yard and off th. Cwn“ SLd. Itote that applicant i. th. builder of th. hcmm and it 1. for aala. 2 Tha proposed fence will axtand fro« the existing *®r‘**, siaa post structure, and will be located approxioately Ii2‘id5 the*actual p'roperty line for .V'r’ijii’St ftiaVAnca of the fence froii the edge of tha pavaoant approxioately 35*. The proposed fence will no v sua obstruction for traffic entering or leaving north Pam Roa . 1 The oroDosed fence location along its entire 300' length appears io beor no .or. than 2- to !• b.lo. th. crown of County Road 6. 4. Th. fence .ill end approxlMt.ly »*J'” iV'VV^the ...t end of the property. The appllcanfa Intent la to have tno fencrrun between the two row. of exi.tinq .Mil tree, which have been planted along the lot line. 5. Please be reminded that Oror.o ordinance, allow «,*' along a County Road (-a najcr thoroughfare") o o3^ lots The zoning code sections dealing with fences are lo. j. Subdivision 15 (c?le,f) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1. Copies of these section are attached as Exhibit E. ■ ‘ ^ % ' Zoainqi Fil* I12t« tf«y 27, 19l«Page 2 of 2 §. Staff would Bota that thia application is unique in that tfcs Majority of prawioua warianca applications for Cenca height have involved lake frontage pro|»rties and have dealt with the issues of fence height in relation to the road crown or in relation to the existing grade, both on swijor thoroughfares and ainor local streets. The Rovegno application at 2010 Shoreline Drive resulted in ordinance language that prohibits any fence fron being within 75* of the lakeshore. The Burton application at 405 Oxford Read, resulted in ordinance anendnenta that established that height of fence and its associated fill nay not exceed 6* above the height of the crown of the road. Bowever, the City has never established criteria for •^^®*kions such as the current application, where properties next to a Mile per hour County road are seeking relief froa road noise and safety for children. DIBCOBBIOa Staff would suggest that Planning Coanisslon review the requested variance b^’ answering a nusd>er of questions! 1. Does the applicant have any reasonable Methods available to hie to acconplish the equivalent purpose? 2. Are there other foras of screening that would be suitable and still be econoailcally feasible? 3. Will the fence create a hasard to the safety, health, and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood? 4. Will the fence be visually obtrusive in the neighborhood, or can the fence itself be screened so as to becone visually anobtrusive? 5. Will approval of the variances to allow this fence lead to laany other siailar requests, or is this situation so unique as to be different than Most other situations? 7. Based on the visual iMpact froM the roadway, is there any reasonable basis for Orono Code to distinguish between lake frontage lots abutting a major thoroughfare versus nonlakeshore lots abutting a major thoroughfare, when dealing with 6' high fences? 0. Is there a justification to allow the 6' high fence only in the side street yard and rear yard where they abut a major thoroughfare? 9. Does the speed limit and average traffic speed to some degree dictate whether a thoroughfare is "major" or "minor", in relation to the issue of decreasing road noise impact? 10. Should there be elements of subdivision design that are required along siajor thoroughfares to eliminate the need for requests such as this in the future? 11. Would it be feasible to approve ♦■ne requested screening fence for a temporary term so that once the vegetative screen has matured, the fer.ee could be removed? STAFF BbCOmiBHDATXOB If the Planning Commission finds that the hardships of road noise and child satevy concerns outweigh m/ detrimental characteristics of the fence proposal, then a recommendation for approval, supported by your findings, would be appropriate. O ^ / / ^ / ' i * * ' . ^ C. / ^ } ¥ ■mmm I 5?‘ ^ J n f.tt *1- > k »•^ fp'ibAmiCATCITY or OBoao - vmuaInitial Apf»licatisn tmm $150.00 ($50.00 par aach a^itional va penawal Varianca Faa $75.00(no changa froa original application) A£tar-tha-Fact Faea (Oonbla application faa)cm 5T oaaefio»M rf locATiamSita Addraas £A iiJt J5.\0$. \04 Prop«rty MmUfictlot. «u^>r (P.I.D.) 4l plaaaa chack oam - ?r;>pax:tv ^ abstract or torrans? Attach legal description to applicati<m if not incl\»Sad on required survey, \ '^V\jL_ VcvriT^ __ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (hone ) Mil.- 4^APPUCABF G Address t ’I’V Pr/Wri^V.* TrV. Phone (eork) »rlL~ M> *^C cA St I City I Urri\c. ivvW4> gjp; SS^S^ (if different than applicant) Name /}j Address: Phone (home) Phone (vork) City*7 ip* Date Property Acquired . I Wof (do not) also twn the adjacent parcels of land. PRlNBrr OSB OF PBOPBBTT Zoning District A (iBonth/year) Present Present Use of Property Residential V other (specify) DISCRIPTIOH OF RBQI Estimated Construction Cost S. Describe request in detail* L* ixVr^X Tt U_:0\j2 riipi> V f-'i g V->; (^V\ -P wr I f _ VARIAHCBS RBQOIRBD _ _ _ Lot Area Setbac)r Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side V Rear) / Other r'l’ f'j c e^-' -x":7 >1 ^ e _ 'V ' ■>'" " ■ - J J r fftmnt »Dcscriln undu® hardship or practical diffi^lty rttiultingf froo strict ®nforcesi®nt of zoning regulations: <■/ c.*'K/C» tr j'j.**/* DBSCEiPTXoa or mnsciAL psopomr comditioiis Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: /U§>j* ^ _Ck __________^_________________ri_____'^i.,rz B1Q0IUD SOINlTTiaiS 1. Coi^leted Application Forsi 2. Certified Prgpei^y owners Lis^of owners ^tthln ISO* (you suit obtain this list frosi Hennepin county Departiaent of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ 3. Steeped# legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the naees on the above list with no return address (use address labels qbtaixisd with property owners list). 4. Certificate^f survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendxn to this application# please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. I. Additional items as amy be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date_ _ _ _ _ _—T APPLXCAHT'8 S16HAT0KB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application# and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge.m I _ Applicant's Signature .>VDate ONHERS 8IQIATURB The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants# agents# Commission members# and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature a.^ __________________ Date ^ ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J '4 wm I* ■ r ut:i9 (‘f^0 Clpi va► cj► 1 ii^# \ ^> X m % J ^ • *•-. - Jt,.} r 1 O n11 I HiilMIHi5“3"2«155^3 iri r:|i|l i’iill ifiiIHSwm 'M mum'»^ 1^ >S33 < » ^ *B5 »i‘*i rm #» «i H 0hi■■28 •"I^oo*-IImil psi«i«-» Ii 8 S“*1 i I ■4//. ' 1^ t t f: . '■ » IT* ^ % 't-.i p I «» 8 li i*Ji* K C ;i, • M M m s; «i*sfir ac i0« i| 8S a gfim •«• M ^ MM ^ m I 6z2 I M -s- *5a-^3 •.|S-28 S8e=|s ^ 2SSSm 5 S3§||* 55ir?•»?22»r J •!< Ml 9 T *^9833mii; M H 8i O M 85^5* ^ ommi^lammM SN:.I 18 «» i 8-I I8 !S a MS| ii 8 il M ii M£ f X. ■:? J •i iii- V , nv *■' 5 fr. ^ V - r-' ^‘ ,*• ^ m- s f f' * » • m m m m m • m •'^ir «iu«i0 10 ** 0 -• A »Mmz';///I 7 ^ ^ •/1^ ^ m ^ V. I ^ »t f i bs — I • V 7, 7 )i c;»oi 4 *'t m 1 7 \ r^/i/ r ? - # ^ ^ o % m V/^/r: »- »• / A f. V 7 ; 'C -X •• • • ' % / #' \ ^ t ^ \ / •’." ••' :■ \\ ■ / . . ^ • ]f \ >-.< **.0 < ,;<jS*V \V I» IPT^va.OiflH \ y *•% -” // ^ c.<;*\ / '.y, ^ /. X i/y: .'T* !^4 '; V \ !T:W? •'■‘ ■ <>S( '■'*»■ ' %i 7 ■ p ■ 1 - . ■ ■ - f.;; /..r-i- ;7 I V -.•» ■ mk' ,M;-j'''■»-j - •/^2|3 ^T- ^roil'OtS^ 1B* U. P* «l>*«x«d .nd tha VSStd“ tCcit^.®* ‘ iWat*!:;. ttuVfThriSK;.^"^'’" •?•“ ‘” .truetur. .lloSid'”?uU2?i‘oa‘V:b^::* *“ S25?iVti',i;? «mn7wiTt■«/'*.';**’'•?/"*• *-"•* Alt.t.tion •«i.,.tl^; flixiSo! ‘*'“* •“•lib* no s/,%rssv.S". AV ■" th«. .n.11 b.‘„VU.t.?*tLn%V»'h;rd*45.rf ‘*‘* inchaa or more shall 5 ''!i5 ® <*^®“«ter of six (6) permit from the Citv ^Irst obtaining a City ,taff providVd thit « iV.IJ'i^ ‘•’J “ •“« *"5 nAVri fUiVccSpt'i'bVe ?2 tree. o* V I c " -*-s O' r I i « ,-V' J m I- 0 m ii''r .'V f ( f99H /^ecoJi.ir fpr»o#> >/./-9y* / / o / JSubd. 5. Ar««, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requlraaanta.2-1/2 atoria. or “hmj* uTt building shall ex»adi Section 10.75: ^ height escept as provided in be observedt ** The following nlninua reqyireeenta shall Lot tot Width 1/2 acre Ido feet Front Yard 33 feet /f^icT AW Side Yard Id feet Side Yard Adjacent to Street TTTeet Rear Yard trieet )**CULATI(MIS rot ■LR-IA*. •Ll«lJk-l» •LB.ie« A / f.,t of .2o«ii*„; "rr.cVviur:Tuir,7'’7.:i ?s^*Vho7iiir ’th7,rs“."iT‘br''''*“'**- ” ‘® J50 fMt of feet of within 7S shall be rei«>ved without f lrst*obtarni%' perl* t^VroLThVCouncil SBC. 10.23. LR-IA ONE FAIIILY LAKBSBORB RBSIOBHTIAL DISTRICT. Residential'^Dist/iot "LR-lA" One Family LakeshoreDistrict is intended to provide a district which will ?ii?t"ed «r7cuUu«; ^enslty^e.ldential^VeVe^o^p^llt'iid ;IL neat L^ke Min,^^r?„nfi Because of the location of the district necessary to proteot^thosi na?® Lake, special regulations ate dense deVelopment. natural resources fro® the effects of 4b S' •>I J'- r % ' ORONO CC 283 (4-1-84) J r 1 fi ? r: ■ .V » ^ * \ K 10,0% c,b,c,r 410.^’^ ^v»SU. / - r* l^5«#HiaC*K-»'w **i‘fCftOlNAlfCR HUffBER 9, SECOIIO SERIES JMl ORDlHMfCE AHEHOIHC PERFORnAlfCB STAllORROS TO THE , HON-BMCROACHREHT AHO ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SECTIOHS OP THE OROHO HURICIPAL CODE The City Council of Ocono Ordains \s Pollovs: SECTIOR 1. Chapter 19 of the Municipal Code of Orono is hereby aisended by aeiendin9 Sections IU.9) Subdivision IS(C)« O)* (R) f (F) and 19.22 Subdivision 1 to read as follows: SECTICH If.93 Subdivision 15 Non*Encroachiaents C. Fences which do not exceed 3>I/2 feet in height, fences not over six feet in height along the street lot line of lake frontage lots which front on a major thoroughfare, if fill is required, the total co'abined height of byth fence and TTO i I n_ox exceed ^ feet al^ve the ~hei^~>t oj^ the cgoun of tj\^ road. terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures, which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line. D. In side or rear yards only, bays not to exceed a depth of two feet nor to contain an area of more than twenty square feet, fire escapes not to exceed a width of three feet, fences and walls not to exceed a height of six feet above original grade and open off street parking except for lakeshorc lots, no fence or wall ovc^ for tv-two inched ^t nq^ ijq excess ojf seventy-two inches ua height above or igi> a 1 grade may be located closer to thjg sho re 1 i ne than the . verage distance^ from the' shore line Ckf. ex 1sting residence buildings oq adjacent lobs, such fences sha 1 1 not be constructed within 75 feet of the shoreline. E. Rear yard only; balconies, breezeways, detached outdoor picnic shelters and recreational equipment except as regulated hereinafter; no accessory structure sha11 be c1oser than five feet from a^ tear Ipt 1 ine_ ngt sha 11 a*~fenc^ wall constructed within a rear yard exceed a h^ght of six feet above**or igina~r gTadeT " F. Side yards only; no accessory structure shall be closer -than ten feet from any side lot line nor shall a fence o_c wa 1 1 cgris±xuc.t£d within a side yard exce ed a height of^six feet abj)ve original gradeT ..... SECTION 10.22. Regulations for One Family Lakeshoce Resi dential Districts. Subdivision 1. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The set back from the shoreline for lakeshorc lots shall be at least 75 feet and no bui Iding, fence or wal 1 over forty-two inchesfbut not 1 J iik>‘‘t r IwI a hi- ■ r.j r' t ; ! ( i :#iP^ * *'ia •xceaa of ««vonty>tvo iocho^a lioighi a^vo oci9loal orada My ba locatad ploaac to tha ahotaiii» thaa tha avaraga diatanca fco« tha ahogalloa of axiating raaidaaea huildinga on adjacant lots* SECTION 2. Adoption and ?ablicatiofi« This ocdinsnca shall ba efCacti va opoo adoption, and a short suaaary shall be publlshad in tha Laka Ninnatonka Sun and Tha Lakar nawspapacs. hdoptad by tha City Coancil of Orono on this 2ith day of January, 1985, by a vota of 5 ayes and p nays.I ar. Mayor \ 1 « r t .1 j t-- # . 41 ■. % / t Sx- 4^' ^r A * k % %T-4, . ^ ■ 4 it» )ecci»i-fF'CiN.‘r^o#^j ,«icrN» /^'f u-xrr* * 10.03t. Subd. 12. Crovdlng Principal Building. Mo acccaaorybuilding or structure, unless an Integral part of the principalbuilding, shall be erected, altered, or ooved within ten feet of the principal building. Subd. 13. Garages. Accessory buildings which are for the storage of autoaobiles shall have the doors thirty feet or acre the property line when said doors face on a public alley or Subd. 14. Yards and Open Spa^s. A. Reduction Prohibited. iMo yard or other open space shall be reduced in area or diaensions so as to aake such yard or other open space less than the ainiaua required by the Zoning Chapter and if the existing yard or other open space as existing is less than the ainiaua required, it shall not be further reduced. B. Application to Only One Ovelling or Group. Mo required yard or other open space allocated to a building or availing group shall be used to satisfy yardp other opeiv spacesp or ainiaua lot area requirements for any other building or dwelling group. Subd. 15. Non~Encroachaents. The following shell not be considered to be encroachaents on yard requireaents: A, (^Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features, aechanical devices, cornices, eaves, gutters and the like, provided they do not extend more than 1-1/2 feet,"^ of f-street parking except as hereinafter regulated. ^ B* Name plate signs for one family dwellingsi lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards'for safety and security purposes, provided the direct source of light is not visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property^may be located to within five feet of the front lot line. C. Fences which do not exceed 3-1/2 feet in height, fences not over six feet in height along the front lot line of lake frontage lots which front on a major thoroughfare, terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures, which do not the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line. ^ side or rear yards only, bays not to exceed a depth of two feet nor to contain an area of more than twenty square -eet, fire escapes not to exceed a width of three feet, fences and imalls not to exceed a height of six feet above grade and open off- street parking. h /V.- > %' * ORONO CC 256 (4-1-84) J * •! - Sf ^ f S 10.03. .. ^ yard cnly; balconies^ accessory structuraa anSrecreational equipaent* escept as regulated hereinafter. .. . Side yards only} accessory structures exceot hal atructure shall be closer thin ten feet from aSy olanUna ^^•{^Ulty. No fcnces» Structures or lits ihaM hi "**’ District on cornerlots shall be peraitted to obstruct traffic visibility within a defined as followst "Beqinninq at the intersection projacted curb lines of two intersecting streets, thence thirty feet along one curb line thence diagonally to a point thirty beginning on the other curb lln^^ thence tothe point of beginning. Source! Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 Subd. 17. Essential Services. This toning Chapter shall ** parait for all structures including utility Mies, and right-of-ways which are an integral part of a systea for public transportation, as for transaitting power, water, heat, coaaunica- tions, gas or sewage by any public utility. The Council shall VatVt^ frf’' • ‘howinq th.t th. public MrvIcV..*^ ^ ^ w.lfare will not be hat.ed by the essential w Paraing, All faras in existence on January 1. follow?nVconliUons^ continue operation subject to the St c ^ tefT ^ ... ^ new "stock faras* shall be created or existing stock^arms enlarged more than twenty-five percent (25%) except under the provisions of a permit. In considering any such permit, the ThA to be kept shall be determined. K method of operation shall be reviewed and the wni t*iat the proposed "stock faro", if in existence, gene^Jl welfare.°^^"^°" ^ detrimental to the public safety and the .^ The establishment of any new building for the housing of aniWs or fowl shall be located 150 feet or more from the nearest offsite residence. ... ^ Products produced on the farm may be sold at retail. One temporary roadside stand may be established for conducting such business. One temporary business sign not over I > If• .r < A f a 9 r 4 ORONO CC 257 (4-1-84) J m i ri ^ / I-A 4 t ‘ s..^. t * % ' ■;fr jL. w .G JttM 1» 1986 Oroso Flaneif^ Cowdssioa City of Orono F«0. lox 46 CryatAl l«y, MB 35323 Ptar Flaottlitg Cn—laalon, He arc the rcaidcats of 1720 North fam load. Wa are oppoaed to IPropoaal Bo. 1286 of Gary Roderick ConstmctlOQ, Inc.'a request for Inilldlnf • fence along County Road 6. ^ feel that the building of a fence would take away iron the natural beauty of living in the country. Alio, the idea of having a fence at the entrance of North rara Bond certainly would not enhance our snail residential coanunity. He can umlerstand the problea of living so close to County Road 6, our lot also facea the road. In keeping with the natural setting of living in Che country we decided to plant large evergreen trees in place of putting up a fence. We irould like to suggest that Gary Rodevlck Construction, Inc. plan soaething sinllar. Perhaps planting nore trees or building a aound will provide aore privacy for the future hoacowners and still keep the natural wooded setting. Sincerely yours. ‘I . •• . ■•I- I ..5 % ^ m f J i _ i ^ ^ F . i • » • . m Mr. ( Mr». B«nia«tn R. Flelii 172f North Far* Rood Long Lake, Minnesota^ 5535*May 31, 19tt J^S^IMOWIW/7^i ^ - 11968 ili^ Orono Planning City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Doif Planning Commission Membars: w. .r« -riling to oppose propoMi Conitruclioo Inc. which owns the new 17«* North Fersi Rood. It Is our undersUndlng that cells for a six-foot high, solkl. wood fence over three hundrwl feet long botwoan tha new house and County Road 6. Wa are tha owners of tha property next to the lived at 1729 North Farm Road for over four years. Wa oppose the proposal for the fence for the following reasons: It is not in keeping with the Orono community ^ barriers which limit tha feeling of op«i spaces and detract from the natural beauty of tha area. Tha fence would be just across the r^d from *°*f^,*[^*J a beautiful, natural preserve of virgin forest and would tend to destroy Its natural setting. 3. The fence would tend to shut out our us from the natural view and openness of Vfoisfeld woods. i|. The fence would create the appearance of a low ment for the North Farm Road area and would set a dangerous precedent for future residential development in Orono. As alternatives to the proposed fence, we would favor Arming the area next to County Road 6 or putting In a row of trws and bushes, possibly with a split rail fence. These solutions are In keeping with 1. 2. Orone Ptanolng CoBmUsJori May 31. 19M Pa^ 2 I « 9$ sicr«w.r* • Sincardy. SlrJUy7 Becky Fidd n V ‘ * v'" v: j %'T. n> ■■ ■ 11 .. I TiBOthy Adam iai9 UMt Fora RomI Lortg LahB* S53S€*Jurm 1, 19dfiHonor«blB MayorDistinfiuiabod H»ab«r« of tK« City Council and Planoinf Coawiisaion Trustod Staff of tho City of OrcHno I a« tnritlns ifi opposition to tho grantirtq of a variance for tho construction of a 6* solid **oodon fonco for a distance of over 380 feet on the south side of County Road 6 just west of Worth Fare ^oad. (dliSOfi) C<msistent with the Coeprehenslve Plan, we have attempted to develop the Fare at Long Lake in such a as to preserve the openness and natural beauty of rural Orono. It is our opinion that a fence as proposed would work counter to these objectives. 1 have driven County Road 6 froe Plyeouth to its intersection with Mighway 12 arsJ find only one instance Mhere a solid barrier was used to screen an unsightly storage area for dead tree removal. Where privacy and noise reduction were desired, I find eany different uses of bireing and natural plantings. Where security and safety are desired, fencing that one can see over or through has been employed. The openness and natural beauty of rural Orono would quickly disappear, if a solid 6* wooden fence were built on every subdivision lot fronting a busy street. I would also question idisther there are hardships in this situation that would support the variance request. The lot is approNimately 2.3 acres and has a depth of over 2^0* from County Rooo 6. There would appear to be opportunities for creative grading and/or landscaping that would alleviate problems relating to County Road & without jeopardising the openness and natural beauty of rural Orono. We thank you for your consideration and hope that the city and property owner can find an acceptable solution. /i » ✓ I Sincerely, JC'-, Timothy . ams [?^[l(ggDWi R IN - 7 1988 J \ i TotTxomi omtmt Plaftniim Comission CMiiman K«ll«y Orono Planning CoMiMion Mmbars City Administrator BarnhardaonJaanna A. Habaath, Building ( toning Administrator July 15, 1988 Snbjacts #1291 Alfrad Ivaraon 2135 Caaco Point load - lafarrad Bact to tha Planning Cossaiission toy Staff List of BzliiMta Sxhibit 1 - Exhibit 2 - Exhibit 3 - Exhibit 4 > Exhibit 5 - Exhibit 6 • Exhibit 7 - Exhibit 8 - valaon Lattar 8/15/88 Total Rardcoaar to ba iMwvad with latriiad Iag>rovaM8nt Plan Original Pront/Street Elevation laviaad Street Blavaticm Lakeside Elevation Side Elevation (Garage) Side Elevation Gaffron Sketch and Fact Sheet for Determination of Final Grade Elevation as Palates to Lower Floor - Used to Determine where Total Height of the Structure is to be Measured from. In preparing for the Council meeting of July lith# the reviewing staff noted the possible need for a height variance, review Exhibit 3. The second story addition would appear to be a loft area that would have required the total height of the structure to be included in the height measurement. Early calculations revealed a possible need for a height variance. In addition, the second story deck was found to encroach Into the yard area approximately 17* where originally staff had advised that the deck was completely located over the existing grade level deck. Once again, the hardcover calculations %rauld have to be rechacked to include the second story deck as it became an encroachment by exceeding a 1-1/2* width at 4*. Staff includes overhangs that exceed a 1-1/2* width with all hardcover calculations. Staff immediately advised the applicant of the need to pull the variance request off tha Council agenda until staff was able to obtain additional information from the applicant*s consultants. At the meeting, the consultant or building representative submitted revised plans, review Exhibits 4, 5, 6, and 7. (The contractor stated that these plans had been submitted to the City. Staff has checked with the clerical person who receives all submissions of new suiterials and the clerk advised that the only second submittals from Randall Construction were the amended exhibits prepared for the additional hardcover removal prepared for the Council meeting for July 11th.) Review Exhibits 4 and 9, the street elevation and the cross section of the three floors. Staff was able to confirm there was no loft and that the wlndow-llke looking features were in reality, stucco sections/ornamental at the top of the roof. Review Exhibit 8. Gaffron has prepared a sketch and table showing the calculations to determine the exposure of the lower elevation. If more than 50% of the lower floor was exposed, the measurement of the height of ^‘4 4# % ^ - ' m-- j I I\4 r ‘VI; mm I'sfe' ":i*- :.• ■ V- • ^ '^■- • Smin^ rii« flanfS9« 2 of 31:1m stroctaro would hdu# to bo ot tho lakeoido. If this was tho caso* tlw applicant would roqwiro a hoiqht varlanco# spoclflcally a 2* uarianca - total boifht 32*. Ravlaw Exhibit 5. Gaffrona calculationa confiro tha lowar laval axpoaura at 43.1% and would ra<ruira tha naasura^mt tahan now froai tho atraat laval antranca ahowing a total oaaaorosant of 2ft*f*» raquiring no height varianca. Flaaaa raviow Exhibit 1. Tha quaation of tho naad for a height variance bacaaa oven oora ioportant to staff in light of tho neighbor who axproasod concern about the view iaaua. In tha original discussions with tha neighbor, staff never noted tho need for a height variance. Throughout tha review, staff noted at tha oaating and also in bmnso foro to both Planning Coawisslim and council that the suistcr badrooai deck was to be extended over tha existing grade level deck. This proved also to bo an incorrect fact as cmly a ssmiII portion of tho upper laval dock extends over tha grade laval deck. 17* of tha 20* deck extends over the natural ground cover. Both applicant and applicants contractor never attaaptad to correct staff in that ass\agtion nor was there any attaopt to correct staff in tha final siano to tha Council. In tha original sat of plans, it appeared to staff that tha second story bedroosi addition was to be built over tha new garage addition. This was incorrect. This is why staff kept noting that only tha oastor bedroosi suite upper deck was approved in this application. The lakeside elevations shoved a system of layered decks that ware not accounted for. 2S,319.5 a.f. 10,064.1 s.f. 10,973 s.f. 1,905 s.f. 737 a.f. 4,786 s.f. or 38.41 or 38.7li As the upper level deck with tha 4* width was to bo included in hardcovaff staff recheckad the 75*250* hardcover calculations against the applicsmtLi. They are as followst 75*250' setback area Existing hardcover par applicant's application Existing hardcover per staff's review House/Porch Deck Tennis Court (total court 5,036 s.f. minus 250 s.f. for portions of court in the 250* 500* setback area and in road right*of*way) Halks/Steps “ 260 s.f. Bituminous Drive • 3,277 s.f. (total drive 3,530 s.f. minus 253 s.f. located within 250-500 setback area and road right-of-way) Staff recommends holding to the 38.4' applicant. Proposed hardcover per staff's review House Deck Tennis Court Halks/Steps Bitunimous Drive hardcover total presented plan -10,864 8 a if a or 38.4% as 10,847 8 e e or 38.3% 3,145 8 • iff s as 805 8ef V K 4,786 8 e ^ a as 192 Safe «a 1,919 8ef e % §■ I ^ J \ IuM i ' *• ✓ % * i fOBin9 Fll* il2fl fmqm 3 of 3 Tho opplicAnt.*! contractor also advlsA^i »•>«* «.%. Planning Coniaaion racoMndation «na confoaad with tho•PPro*.l for tho M.S? ?T!rr? hiiS^oI^ *’'•» «c.lY.a eonfaaad whan ataff aubalttad tha notice ^•rm avan aora •howlng tha raductlon of 321 a f of harai«A»^^*^^ 1*!*^ ratriaad auraary *.f. praparad by tha acDllcant^a v^*®®** raawaal and tha 321CounclJ. ^ •PHtCMt. con.olt.nt for tbo Jul, Utb oootla^ of th* •*•** ■MBaBtadatloB . ••tback area at 3i.4%*^ Such raaSaa?. Vi k * ’ hardcover within that ^®*pcctlona by tha bnildino lnat:*o*>nV #* co>[plctad prior to tha axlatlng raaldanca. naing inapactor for tha addition to tht 4^ I W h:.. m j a’ I X ‘ V> 4 U^ 9k4 OHirtt* Sittei ma CiM* iNiM teai SSSf< j^TTEMTXOli: Village of Orono Plmnnlfig Cssmimaion I^^I^ISiXIiG: ifardoovor Variaoco 1I5CATI0M:Alfrod Ivoroon Prof«rty 3i3S Casco Point lboat<ll Us ars dteaply c»nosrnsd tlkat ths propossd chanaso rsrsan prcmrty will dstarlorats ths valu# Of our prc^Mrty by bloclcing our visw of Laks to tha Ivsrsan Of our pr If innstonka. Our is locatsd acrcMs ths strsst froai ths Ivsrsan property. Ms built it so that thsrs would bs a good visw of ths laks and «fs fssl this visw adds to ths value of ths property. By adding to ths Northeast end of their property and constructing a garage id)sre the plans indicate it will be constructed, our visw will be blocked. I have ratviswsd the plans on record with the Village of Orono. We feel this variance should not be granted unless it cem be denonstrat^ to us that our visw of ths lake will not be reduced. % Ik i ‘n•J. *■ : ■ ^ ■■ •v<# .. J I. -r-. ^ ■ M,'- W f. f ; : i:- w f m^- # 0 »* % '> I L£h':€^ l^’:''- »***^ tv^ - Af‘>. «; -^tiV* ir? pTal u. 12-^.' ' ~ 0 % ■ . ... , . ‘r' J ■1. 0 \ • 0 ■ W tJ I ■^v:. #Wk* • s : 7^*l--gj■ • •■•• ■-'' ■ i ?^v^r. ■ J [*■ t 'V.rS. p. ’ -.V: ^ \ .> 2^ f ' S5 . ^Z >i 4 •^'* # -L * * • * '■■u « i> ^ I I J '•Ty -> ‘ ji' • I «* ' S r ' i-' .,, .T-. 1 ‘ ^ :» / sd r •»f>^i< vj^ rk « OC> # .0 \ - »♦ ^ '; s~^ % 5>V % > u» y^wr? r ?5w« £•?"’’ ° * 4 II t. »i •**•’*•’ •*>« .. f '* '’ _ r A 5 $ % a u» i 4 t- <• •4. 4- }% \ % %1 % \ % %> f tf -tv ' 3- :. v. v' " '■ ■ V , \ f f♦ » j V .A •, % ' I ■ ,£ :\t r.^ y i / ' .j C' C/4 IV*' 0-C‘ I -r<? ffieu7 vg^F'Y ^ Sj2» C*! M.^ ^' y <» 4t>& I -A 4 14 ’H' a<7 fc* - u ^ ■ % .<1r . ’r a; .* ^ ‘ - ' . ‘..V-IJ.li-t- Qivi, •■;$»? r 4, •• * *»*' n . \ J if?;tiL ?%;v: Vl ■ ^ :f.: u; ^ ^4 ' % * ♦ f I i s % % i i» « 4 Y % f % ■■{ih I 'r.I V" '.^1 tox Fl«nnln9 Co*«l8«loti Chairvtan Kslley Orotio Planning Coaadasicm Meabcra City Administrator Bemhardsoa Dmtmt Jaanaa A. flabiisth. Building & Zoning Administrator July 14» 19Sa #1300 Anthony Eidan 2290 t 2340 Abingdon Nay - Conditional Uaa Parmit - Varlanca - Public Hearing lomiiif Diatrlet - RH>1B Aram - 44> acres IPart I neat Ocdimamoam * Action 10.03, Subdivision 19 Applicant requires a Conditional Oaa Parmit to axcavata a pond locatad within the shared lot line of two residential lots owned by the applicant. Lot 8 contains applicants homestead and Lot 9 is currently ^developed. The dredging of the poi^ exceeds the 100 cubic yards standard. f qradlng, dredging, excavation isallo^ within 26' of a designated/protected wetland area.Required - 26* Proposed •• 20* Variance • i* or 23% List of KxhlMts Exhibit A - Exhibit B > Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application Property Owners List Plat Map MCWD Permit Applicant Cook Letter DNR Netlands Map Original Proposal Current Proposal Review of Application G. In addition, review Exhibit F, the southeast portion of the proposal •ncroaching a DNR protected wetlands. As Cook's letter notes in revising the original plan, Exhibit E, the pond should be reduced in sise to eliminate excavation in the designated wetlands area. If applicant application seeking encroachment of the wetlands \mwm \0 \ j ^ it*.'* \ Vi ? *■ «» :. ; •r Zoning fiU fUQQ fm9* 2 of 2wotlands oro«« roqviJTOO • vorlonco totback to the 2€* setback standard of «». Roviow Exhibit H. Tho area of tho pcmd adjaconc to tha dosl^nattd wetland will not contain any exposed or disturbed soils. The fill and grading is to be done to the northwest side of the proposed pond with appropriate ailt fencing to be placed at the lower elevations to prevent erosion into the pond elevations. After final grades are cosipleted* seeding will innediately follow. Please note the prc^osad drainfield area has not been effected by the excavation of the pond nor the filling and grading to the northwest of the proposed pond area. The changes and alternaticms will not effect drainsge as drainage will still flow to the wetlands area to the southeast. The island in the center of the pond will provide a natural habitat for the wildlife sought the applicant. The pond will function predominantly as an aesthetic jf*.•ill* The city engineer has also called note to the fact that the pond will be located over a drainage and utility easM^nt* located along the shared lot line. Re notes that this will not create any probleas relative to the fucure use of the easement. Although the required setback of 26* has not been naintained froa the designated wetland, once again staff would note that no disturbed soils would be located within the area of the wetlands and the drainage froa the newly filled area will be draining around over gz'ssaad areas before it reaches the wetlands to the southeast. In addition, the applicant will provide the necessary silt fencing until the ground cover has been restored. Staff lapnsaainitstiea To approve a Conditional Use Perait and setback variance application of Anthony Biden for the properties located at 2290 and 2340 Abingdon Way based on the following findingst 1. The pond excavation will have no negative impact on the existing wetlands to the southeast, nor on the existing septic systea on Lot 8 or on the future drainfield areas on Lot 9. 2. The pond will provide a natural habitat for wildlife. 3. The applicant does not propose any disturbed earth being stored within the area adjacent to the wetlands. 4. Undisturbed soils will be isaediately graded and seeded as soon - as the excavation of the pond is completed. ! 4 Approval is subject to the following conditions: I 1. Appropriate erosion control shall be aaintalned throughout the project, silt fencing shall be Installed as shown on the plans by Coffin and Gronberg revised date, 7/12/88. 2. Applicant shall stake the proposed drainfield areas prior to the excavation to Insure protection of the proposed drainfield areas on Lot 9. 3. Upon complete of the final grades, the entire disturbed areas shall be seeded and erosion control/silt fencing shall remain in place until ground cover is restored. ■ *r I mmm* V ' V j ■# *•r * » . I !►* 'I t I I «• K i 3 t 1 • '• t i ;)* \ \ :-t ciTT or cmam AFTLlSSlQllrmmj loamoa ^Sit« Address ____ itkk^Z^4^{) //>yProperty Identification Hu&ber (P.I.O.) / “Haaae check oiui -* Property \/ abstract or (for conditional Oae Applications only)torrent? AmxCAIt (hone) A/i oJlfZ »«■« Aifhom/ S/Jr than applicant <g^g/ HasMi ant Address Phone City lip MS - COHDITXOHAL 081 PBINITS - Renewal Pee - 1/2 Current Pee ^^^•Jf-the-Pact Pee - Double Current Application Pee $100.00 a)Residential accessory Use $150.00 b)Institutional (church, school $150.00 c)Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d)ComsMrcial/lndustrial Use $200.00 £)Land Alteration * * I Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling 101 cu. yd. or siore Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 7S of lakeshore Mkiji ■ ^mm ^%WI' PRD/PID • see fee schedule OTBBR APPLICATXOHS ___ $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Cononercial Site Plan Review (•♦• consultant fees) Vacation Basement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Resoning Appeals Other - see fee schedule > ♦ I % j # j 44 *t 9 t if’: f * ‘ 4 / # i f { ism osB » iwwmrPr«ftcnt Xoningi District IBPresent Ose of Property Kt^f ResidentialOtKer (specify)iDracRimon or mmoarnsr Descrifc» request in detail:y7#Vwi ids/^ a. JuiiA UgOIUD 80RM1TTRL8 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Coaipleted Application Forsu Certified Property Owners List of owiiers within 350* (yoo can obtaiii thia liet frcMi Hennepin County Oeparteent of Pinance A-403 Goearnwenfc Center 34i«3271) w. » *.wStasiped* leqal sited eneelopes (flQ) pre-addressed to each of the naaes on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (esi^ 6. 7. a. SSf' 93^ $ alterations involve changes Construction plan* if appli Plat Hap. As an addendtjai to this appl ' any other persons you wish n The applicant and Property Own 4^ A rea^aber that your application is not been included. ‘ esiA tmf :s> if land hts). rate list oft —..... on. omation has Certification by Zoning Departaen coaiplete Zoning Officials Signature AmaCAlTT'S SlCHATOaS The applicant hereby agrees tc ----- •.a.ua cequireo or requested by the Zoning Administrator* agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the beat of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's signature XLJI Date .57/^ /y Oinrass 8ICHATOXB The owner hereby acicnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff* consultants, agents* commission members* and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification oi^this request. Owner's signature ______________ Date Applicant must have all siltoittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building I Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. rm—I' < ■4.. « > J II %.% I .# & > ■ -t<- A vV !a!>^Anr O .-i-a^ I I I Siiini r I i m:silih J a " fi “i«SSP4 ■231- 8 ill-»m Sill!* etis<S Bf—,i S*8*” i l:ii I s|:p si--s; *»isis & — iM *41 5»5rlgJ M Q 3 2 s* «>* ti Ma ^ (t iili i®ii i®"- ■ mik M f 2 i ■» i 818 ii^ m m 8S ES--?Ill i!i§ Jm* i'iSi*»r= iilifl sis.is ¥1 •€ ^ g **18li'=ii |l|l MSi E <s - " '^M Jf il»* ■ M a! i Wi « «l| !i ■s« r£. iecS I8 iL':is .*i“ij) S'- P $iit iMi Sii:ir 23 S| I I Sis:"s*-i» 2 ^1^6-aS?.8?i S3 I -13isf ii ”r•»*JSI-= I^ 2c iC K *■ i &Bm m fm s8 P»n I ®■ a I * ? i 3I |8 3 ~£X J §• s^-ii-., “, >» • . r. k. '' ' m ■%' *' M r 1'^ % m M :v 4 r mm J ^.1 j rI 1 i;I s p i't '4-" I .« • 1.,- f- , - ^ ■t * / % - ,'V / I ./ IJ r «ta- ?i|l xS! I|2g X ^ •fs,s *3i§ a ssi* i? 3 m iiiL § # it': -*.. .,te •\*V J % ^ ( ‘ > % «• O' »«w If *(■-: J '-■I -t f ♦ % / 3 ¥ ■r4 ' MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PX) . Boa 3i7 VKvynta. M»w*a K»tt Slltl oCuliz;D APPLICATION roM pf ratrr (Sm ,7?>-y y f Oanpr^i flipnsArtttn Cdt^>£r^£- ±W-*5em JS[ p.E. ^ ats. □ UL □ Qmtf & Pvrmit RpquMiK ¥tr. (CIM Al Appre^riaM Boces) IB. StormwUpr Mintgamtni Plio □ Comn^ciai C InPuttnll n In^uSOfiAl SI 0. J^WMtaitd AllirafioA E. iBkOrtdg^ F. □ SHortf^w^BAnk tmprovemint 0. □ StraarrWyiNi Ctotiing C. □ Ftoodplain AJisraiJon L Project LocAiiCfi: __1 I ?- ------Mtl 5 DescfiOi the Project 7>r rpyp d^f(di^Adl—4V*/ At^-------- prsTA'^TJC.r P/’T /r c P^re fyo>.v<»4 6. If This Project Requires Municipal Approval & Review, Attach DtKumentaiaion of Myntcipal Review. 7. Body of Water. Stream or Wetlartd Affected by Runoff From Thj* Site: TiT r//C Distance From Project: >^f^T______. ■,.n... 8. Schedule For Construcrion, Impfemeniaiion ol Temporary Erosion Controls. Substantial Completion and Restora tion;• TAAT^ZLL Di ■ r-"' 4-n i! in ccmpleling mis lorm Is required. In submilting this lorm. the :r«;'d,:ra;iTc.ut:e«sTo^^ .PP.^, ^ m, pupashop R.I.. da.ed ■/i'- J ri I ?! « P. I Vi ■i « 1 ■ * 0- *: % r MM f I I # ^4 X *.'V I ♦ I ♦ i i V d ■1 . .1 ' } m Bonestroo ROsene Anderflk ft Associates wcA Ic c• cIt % 4s •f>• m9. n. m m1 (H . •«!•«mt #ftl t A ••^.V«l iH H %mm. Mngfmum ft Archtttco Jmty 12, IfftS City of (h'oao ios 66 Crystal lay. Ml 55313 At to: JaaoM RaVastA la: 139*1300 Aothooir lidao 22M*, 2340 A6inf4oo Way Oaar Jaantfia: ^ Th« ,««4 ,r«,oa«4 betvoen leCf 2290 «a4 2U0 ftbiaHo* Vay ah«tli %« r,4tt«4 ifi ■ is« to alimiaatc «»cftT«lott U th« ftaatgnatad vatltndt tru. Th« wottli b« located acrota • draiug* «ad utilitp «aa«MQt. If, do not r««l thsa will create any probleu relative to future ua, ©f tht eu«c8t. The pond ahould be in accordance with vaterahed raauirManla. lilt fence far protection of the wetland areaa will be required. If you have any queationa, plciie contact the office. Youra very truly. KWESTIOO, POSIHI, AMDItLIK ft A8SOCUTES, llC. Clenn R. Cook CRC:kj 9687f 2335 M^st Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 '1^ 1 J n\ r«. ■yi. 4 1 «%«%f:« «^ ttk «• <M m^ m m . •# M » , ' •« r t 'j-ui*•-' : 1-. -c > H 2 3ry#y;’J ^/ :i^ys;-liLif 5r I 4BB»’ ’fi f' X y. ^ t fr 1 l^vi^ j •>■ 0 h} I 1'^ 1^ B F »lvJ-. S' K»r>i^E.b.T .Tl r « r r^/■ s'-y r «: J.. r iiTi njM fm mt cidm OTisn • f. I. MiKoca au MC«am CMiTv. ► ,• .f \L 4- M ■f. ■ ^ r- r/^ 0. ^ 0 4'i'iiilii.i"liM: f I ■ %■ y * «- * ( -f*:. ■ Date : 8-14-07^^« Scale; r « 100* .-f/i:—: Existing contour ; Proposed contour Datum: Mean sea ‘eve! COFFIN I GRONBERG, INC. Engineers, Land Surveyors, Plarmers long lake, Minnesota ■m # -fl ;go j » m ' /-V sin KM m fser itsn V sen t an* f. «.«■ 1. mtmm ata MCWtaiM CaUHTV. niK5«Ti m f »• m,. /If rrcr'^4/ I i J 'L * rot mr»t Planning CoMissioA ChainMn ir«ll«y Planning Coamiaalon Manbars City Mbniniatrator Barnhardson Jaanna Nabuath, Building 6 toning Adtalniatrator July 13« 19St •1302 City of OrMio*Cryatal Bay Road-Coiklitional Uaa Parsiit and Varianca - Public Bearing. PBBTlBnrr SBCrioas or COOIt section lO.Ol Subd. 19 - city of Orono aaaka m Conditional Oaa Parait to parforn cartiin land altarationi involving i^rovaawnts of tha road b«3 excaading 100 Cubic Tda. of fill. Saction 10.22 Subd. 2 - Tha City will parfora certain land altaration aetivitiaa and place atructuraa auch aa retaining valla within tha lakaabore protected araai Required ■> Proposed • Varianca 75* • 10* • €S* or 16.61 LIST ■niBlTS A B C D E P Plat Map Proposed Ovnar's List Certificate of Mailing Cook Letter Infornation on "Duckbill Concept Profile of Tvo Options of Repair OP APPLICATlOBi Por the past yearf the Public fforks Director has attempted to vork vith tha property owners adjacent to the sections of Crystal Bay Road that were washed away in the storm of July 23, 1987 with the intent of a comprehensive repair of the road bed and adjacent private property. The comprehensive repair would deal with tha replacement and improvement of the road, stabilisation of the road bed and a refilling of the shoreline that was washed away with the storm. The Director has had no success in dealing with the 4 property owners and has recommended that because of the question of public safety we proceed with the repair of the road bed and allow the individual property owners to apply for individual conditional use permit applications that involve the filling of the lakeshore property adjacent to the road bed. Please review Exhibit D. Cook's letter suggests two options or methods of repair of the road bed. Both Cook and Gerhardson have selected option one as the method having least Impact on the sensitive area. Review Exhibit P. A cross profile has been shown by the engineering staff of both options. The Duckbill option, option 1, is at the top of the page, in addition to a staff sketch of a simple elevation depicting what it would appear like from the lake looking toward Crystal Bay Road. A 5 foot high retaining wall will be just below the road bed and would remain until the individual property owners would apply for the appropriate Conditional Use Permits to fill in the land area adjacent to their shoreline that was washed out in I 1 m % J m - a: « • ■it*' V V r 4 .- ‘i'-iA% IResoluticni Film 1302 July 13r 1988 Fmg9 2 of 2 tlM ftors of l«8t yocr. STAFF IBCOMimATXOat Staff rocoMonda approval of a Conditional aaa Paralt and Varianca Appllcatloo of tha City of Oroao that woo Id allow approalaataly 200 liaaal foot of tha roadbad of Crystal Bay toad to ba raatorad to a aafa conditioo for tha public oaa. Sabjaet to tha follewlim ccmditicma t 1. Tha City shall provida appropriata aroslon contrelo throughout the antira projact. 2. All work shall be parforvad within the public road easaatent of Crystal Bay Boad. 3. If tha City finds it necessary to close off this section of road during tha repair period, tha City eust provide adequate warning and substitute access if necessary. K w J r. a itris ts • • 1 ^ m L i u&. 7,R.2: f 7 r* r.//r,/f.£3 mttm Is@mi%6^ 9 caw ®\ ^^'»YST4|, 7,R23 J la ’. m ' -H ‘■w V.JV .41 «*«• f h I 4 t . i Property cumer* U«t for JIppUcetion il30J17-117-23 41 0011 Richerd An^lerson 3205 Crystal lay load Hayzata, KN 55391 17-117-23 41 0010 Tin Sclmipp 321S crystal lay lloadi wayzata, nn 55301 17-117-23 41 0009 tMimynm Schibilla 3235 Crystal Bay load •sysats, tm 55391 17-117-23 41 0012 ffilliaa NOlfe 3255 Crystal Bay ipi^ **«y«sta, NN 55391 •» i-M 6 % ■’ll . i ... ^. s'*' J ? • : b ■. 1< Jh %•y ..fir iT. r I •■. ■ *Jh I ■9 e<:cnmicm c9 fjOUHeSTATS or MI 1 i * *1 «.*■Tf Of HfiOIBriS I •• CITT or oso 1, Jaale Bosm. of tho City of Orono# Umnn^pin County, NiBBoaota, do haraby cartlfy that a lotica of foblic SaatiBf coBcarBiiis tha Mttar of flioa, waa Ballad to tha attacKad list of property owitara . Zb mtBaaa Whafaof, Z have haraoato aat ay hand and aiaill thia 1th day of duly, Iffl* 1 JaB I ■m I 1 t ■ ^ 4 J ' c Ml , ft' #■ i '»f • : ^ * >■ \ I f { ) 1/1 BonestroomEJimMRosene AnderWc & Associates mt m9 f C• c B • e • i •f #1 M •f*• ft •i c I. 9«#«•f •t•«P«H I* «> m « 1 At A I m o «« 9« I A CngirniFi A ArtMtects Jhm U. 19«t City of OroiBO •ox •« Cryttoi toy. IB 3SJ2J #11 Attat Hr. Jote CcrAorAson t«t rUo Ho. Ut Cryttoi toy Door Join. Wo hOTO roolovoA tto roc<Cryotoi toy too4 oHoro etoxs doasfoloootroctioo of occurrod lost ouaBor. Tbo proposo4 ctmttriKtlrat e<Hil4 h» eoaploio4 vitli ■iniaol ditrvptiCT ootiido tho uittlof povod svrfoco. TIm 4osifa It ouch tbot tho vork con bo eoi^lotod oith City forcos. Wo hovo dotoilod too dotifn procodttTOi thot amid bo a«o4 for toldinf thoi otroot in ploco. Coro olU booo to bo oxtreiood to proooot doMoo to txiotlsa tttilltiot in tho otroot. Cttlgn otto oottld roquiro oxctTotl<m of o tronch 5 foot doop olotm tho m>rtlu shouldor. Ploccnnt of •• s •* posts 6 foot oa cootor oith 1* plonking vonldl bo roquirod. Tho potto would thoa bo tiod bock with two diKkbill idichort ot ooch post. Dosign two vQold bo tlailor to dotign oao with oxcoption of thti tiobocks. ^ ooiild roquiro thot I* diaaotor gslvsnixod stool rods tai driven under tho roodbod. Excowstion of tho rod end pUceaoat of • tiahor or cone rots anchor would bo nocossary on tho south side of Crystal Boy lood. We ostiaoted thot 225 lineal foot of shooting would be roquirod oloag this section. Tho aatarial costs for either option oould bo obout $25.00 per ll®ool foot for a totol of $5,600.00'. The astiaatod coat to hero tho work coaploted by a ctmtroctor would bo $19,600. ’.f you desire to proceed with either of these design options. tii would bo pleased to provide design details for the work. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSEKE, ANDERLIK k ASSOCIATES, INC.BONESTROO, RC Glenn R. Cook GRCtli Eael 2335 UAst Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636<4600 ^ f' i A■..m V :1* , J % %-v^’ ASW f , n»*i • ’ i ■'■¥ -N-;-- ^ t. I The OUCKBILi* C^oncept Tv^iwf Mnrtw cr«Mie<tOSHA F«et| l4o WS7Alf OUCWBl t t •'v(h Anchors ma nrw €0 ml mi me anefiaimq tammmm end ere '» — fnu cen •» hw» <«) wm.Mb DUCKBIU OUCKOU ••nr*'’® no t» lu SuOOO be Hetlxy cerecdy The Federal gor«nmeni. Oaies. cdies p»e<c *endwapw». and dt>tt »t*e »aie re 0eaui^vejt die mwm mmmrngtMjcumi lo hoiit eeoM hee^ ehede. lenoee. porn-ihie buMilin^. tfieiere. tewdi rnmm*. cwieinrciw eqiiiprnere awpierwe nrieeM*} «m«a camMess glher otpcts And OUCKaN.1 fpce% “ »end»eem* ersj e«xl djrna^e «| pmIA c erwi e e - id e / -eV # a I privaie ppoper^ Now OUCRSIU. Iltertit A new concepl DUCKIiLl Anctwes ere driven min fhe rjmund verticeBy wdh a mmmmm nl penetration reeislance wlMth contacts and does not diMurto tiie toil a puds agamet once driven to die rei|u«red depth an upward putt on the cable planes (Kitaies) ttie OUCKOiLl mm a load lock pos4ion at approxtmatatv IS’ from hoiUOf^ Fmlhor upward tens Kill causes t he anchor to plane sideways thirxigh the earth, agamsi urxtishabed soil, resistir^ piilkxd ary] iry:rsasing tiotding power. Atfvanlo9os of DUCKBILL DUCKBILL ts salei Ifian convenlional anchors because It leaves no rigid lods, slakes, pipes or sterns atxive jyooryj to injure peojilo and ammats or (inmaao mobile equipment DUCKBILL has a built in 2 i safety factor . - •• # -9 OU^AIt ft eimv le eoM and n a latmr and tno dev«e Ore e«m can o«ve OoCKBb.i ttdll Keid pamm toots No m mUm iwtpower, no srfdiNcatoil mac herein laM Mil Oj*y D uckbills can tm Oweo by fory] m mr m Nr by w mg . OUCKBBi can m and concieii &c» 6rae DUCKBKL^ paNedad Drive l^a* drwea Shasjhl «ob the outa^ at any aryjld and wO not wander from ts drive path ^A^Nie moO ary hors whch distut) the toi when malaled, OUCK^t compacts the sod when diwen. and m toad tock postion. continuaMy ptanas Mo undiahebed sot yttoon OUCKBIU is Otven Mo the ground, il ateya m the grouryi DUCKim IS are lw|ht m weight lor |hav Slrengili They are 10% die wr^jht anrj cMy 12% the volume m ^nppriHj. Kandhng arm storage ct meat conventional oryiiort >kior kntght. tvinclliny and slurago smvnmjs .vu Sub!>l«ntMl DUCKBILL win not coruxto or nj5f. and tho rWAi is TwAi stiengih gaivarv/od steel Made ol high impact and shock resistant Tervaioy akimtnum a^jy A typical corrosion lest result ry> loss m mecharHcal properties Idler immersion lor 90 days m aeratn] 3% sal! water strfution Outdoor exposure lasts by tho ASTM at urtian. suburb.»n ary] sea coast iocaiiord lor a p&iod ol ten years have demoosirated the corrosion r^istance ot IcnzjSoy as have hundreds of iryjusinal applications DUCKBILLS luivo been proven to use world wflde. and llyiir jiorfurmance is s'jbsiantiated by independent eryjineering tests aryl arvaiyses. Technical data is availably on <equesl r* ... VC^it'-■=• 1J s r kJ J M- % i ^ r I 4 * duckbill *^ Slandard Brtve Rods Iiod»l40 MM^ea % V , ‘^TH| ahsi Mo«*M3a Olka ' '• 4'. r. 4, M|.t f. •strwiinc can W* «*»»»• fOtlE tlKwvi finya Specificalfons w W 'V 40 60 88 138 Ma<at HaWb*^ Pmmt !•» Marmai tan •ArtTT rACTM CaMa •raakiav tteanfftte Hlateraaltaf) tiaal Cateta CtMa ! Lanvtl) 1 ifPail Aa# WalfM 40«)t 1 250 tet 1 450 tea Ite." 7a;tr 1 Qi SOrtina 35te« l.iOOIw 1.70011a te* 7a 7 i 2*^» n 4.5 od 24410M 7lbs (M Q01 3.(X»bs 7 QOOIbs U" 7*19 14 02 -ni ' 12/Um It iia ■I3« OBI S.fXXtIjs S.aoota ')'.*• 7*19 sri 2 5tes »2/boi 32it>s 8 I .IH litfH #•‘ If .<M.w4 fytf m Sates olhf^-s »he Untied Suites. Un«ed Kmcxiooi ^ Eunjpe. CtVwKl<i. Ausealia and Japan Oietl al Maames to 1^ FOneSKSHT ”vAMlIMOUBimes MMC. U S Pnirni nuini>e,s 4.044.S13 and 4 00« en and other Mitomalwifiiil |i,ti(>nts AJditKuwiI fiatenls tieialaig hit C4n cnMM any oImi kn sow S|>€< iltnittems Miiiimi It) dvmqp mmIIhmi I byi Ste-^ -•*,v ■"’It V;v'4 ^4.;#- ■/ >• * S u ; ■ I I tM4*^it|llf Im f *KHi6 l/jl4 J •4 4:-4 ...n ’V > » ■M’?■ # ♦ . 0- \ % < » t ^ f m• •IJI •sncstfBOABiCfie /MtrW a in AtsocUtn _________41 •§ ^ ^ ''CN*^' jOrd*<^ '1#^ *-1_____^.'- .. ^. .Pr«j*t» ^ 1 /* C tl- • t'>-*C«odM«^ r«r ***^»"*< ®y ictc.0^* tJl^DJtP CM«r 1 /•' 'D«H%ii>*l ft"* It" PI f> 4# «'*»5 ’’j»lO Rbsf «4' O.C. ►.^ ■ -‘.rtite: ^%V” *C#AAv« |V t ^_____ ^ iLiMTe. .. 2"ii /2’ |p/#»rtci*»^ .1 cv- Coi^tref^ A^U»r f **/^#M i^Oo/ a • ^'<8% lo'l^jf (£ OC. m$T ‘ X)^SlQr7 Opf^J 'Tu3Q 'jp?- ;* • i 5.;' i i ■ ii^ % I J :14 ‘^4 r . ^ % / 4 I '■'V % /t i Tot Planning Coamlaalon Chairsaa Kell«y OroDO Manning CoMiatlcm NaAbara City Adaiiniatrator Barnhardaoc i« Jaanna A. Maboath, Buildlaf ft Xonin^ AdBiBiatxator DatCi July 13, 19t| fbib;^aots 11303 Allan and Shirlay Raiabale, Ifi® Fagarsaaa folnt Road ~ Varlanca - Public Heariiui Mooing f ^ I • Ajiproxlaataly 20,311 a.f. or .4ft acraa - .5 roqiairad Saction 10.22, Sobdiaiaion 1 (B) Lakeahore aatback varianet raqairad for tha ralocation of approaiaataly 40* of a ft* high privacy faoca raanlting froB 3^icial dataraiaatioa of tha aharad property line between tha Allan Raaabak and Orville Fiahar propartiaa. Regoired Bxiating Fropoaad Variance 0* 35* 35* 40*or S3l Liat of Bafeibita Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I - Application Property Ownera Liat Certificate of Mailing Plat Map Stein Latter ft/15/88 Order Detareining Boundariaa/Torrena Action Rasabak Survey 10/14/85 Fiahar Survay Revised 12/11/87 to Show Shared Lot Lina as Judicially Datareinad Staff Skatch Review of ^plioetlon In a recent torrans action that judical ly datareinad the shared lot line between the Rasabak and Fiahar properties, approximately 60* of tha existing stockade fence was found to encroach into the Fisher side of the lot line. Review Exhibit H. The most recent survey of that lot line, the fence location can be seen to be approximately 1' to 1/2' into the Fisher property, for approximately 50' to 60'. The total fence measures approximately 130' along the south lot line of the Rezabeks property. The section of fence involved in the controversy is located at the east side of the fencing. Review the staff sketch. Exhibit I. Approximately 70' moving eastward from the west shoreline of Lake Minnetonka appears to be located within the Rezabeks side of the property. As you move eastward, approximately 60' is shown to encroach into the k* Rezabek attempted to relocate 13* of the east side of the fencing, but was stopped by the Orono staff and advised that a variance to lakeshore setback was required to relocate the fence. Mr. Fisher has J 4 |-r \ toiling ril* #1303 Pag* 2 of 3roMovad apiproxlMtaly 40' of ftnclng. Staff re<|\iastad that nr. Flahar giv# thm Rezabaka tba taction of fencing raaoaad until this Mttar wat ratolead. it it ttafft undarttanding that th* Fiahara ara ogtotad to the relocating of the aubjact fancing within hr. Razabaka lot linaa. In aarly ditcuationa with hr. Fiahar, whan hr. Fithar attuaad that the fencing waa located within hit lot line* there waa diacuaaion about the inatallation of the new fencing and ataff adwiaad that variances would be raquir&d. Unfortunately Hr. Rezabak was not aware that to relocate th* €i* high privacy fence raguirad variance approval alto. One* again, please Exhibit I. Rota that 20* of the diaputed section of fancing is located out of th* 75* setback area and can be relocated within Ratabaka ioi line, 40* it located within th* lakathora protected area, requiring th* nacattary setback variances. At hr. Rezabak advised, 13* has •^*^**^y been reinstalled within his property lines. The applicant does not plan to install a new fence, ha seeks only pareission to reinstall the fencing that had existed on what ha thought was within hit property when he purchased his hone. Review Exhibit E. Applicant's attorney has already stated that th* judicial deterninatIona of th* torrence action made no claim as to the ownership of the existing iaproveronts that encroach th* subject lot line, but it clearly would appear from an observation of th* property that the fencing was Installed by th* person who Installed all of the fencing on the north and south lot lines of th* Rezabak property. Once again, the application Involves th* relocation of 40* of fencing within th* southeast yard of the Rezabak property located approxiaately 35* from the east shore line of Lake Minnetonka. Smggested Issttes for Consideration 1. Are th* circunstances surrounding the structure unique to thi* property or cosmon throughout the City? 2. Does the location of th* 40’ of continuous privacy fencing create a hazard or present a hazard to the public health, safety, and welfare? 3. Has th* applicant created the hardship within this case? Will approval of this variance be considered nerely a convenience for the applicant? How similar is this application to the applications filed as a result of storm daauige? 4. Does the fact that we are dealing with an existing fence and not installation of new fencing have any bearing on these considerations? Alternatives of Action and Receasary Findings A. To deny the lakeshore setback variance application of the applicants based on following findings: 1. Applicant has not demonstrated sufficent hardships to warrant approval of the setback variance. 2. Negative precedent would be established in the review of future applications dealing with requests for structures within the lakeshore protected area. jsmma W£ii t J i * I i ^ ’* J V r i 1 ^ ifk mmi ■■ ***.■ iI I \ * »» \ * H ‘ Hi Zoning film I13QI P«9« 3 of 3B. To ntcrovo tho lakcshore letbaclc varianco apfilication of th» applicants baaad on tha following findings and hardshipai j;or -.it-r,! s:r‘.:2«n^"rrU\“j:5:i*Sc:roS that radafinaa tha aharad lot lina. j ^4««2. Tha fenca inatallation involvaa tha rainstalling of an axiating fanoa and doaa not involwa naw structura. Tha Jf ancroach any cloaar to Laka Minnatonka than tha fanca did in its original location. . . ^ .3 Tha location of tha fanca in tha otraat yard doaa not praaant a hasard to tha public haalth, aafaty or walfara. Thia body can not dual in aaathatic isauaa. . . ^4. Tha circuaatancaa surrounding thia fanca structura ara unigua t this proparty and ara not cowaon throughout tha City* It ia not a occuranca to hava a lot lina raarrangad aftar pr^>artiaa hava baan daraloped with axisting iagirovaaants. Approval should ba conditionad on tha following! - ..wj Tha applicant is placad on notice that all fencing located wi^in the lalcaahora protected area is considarad non-conforaing structura and can^t be replaced with new fence sections without appropriate City JJ? applicant is encouraged to replace deteriorating fencing with natural screening in tha future. J % I i I m is •t m if I#)i%% ri « i I .t I i pi Ciw or OSOIIO - VAKIAMCS hmtCATtm . Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)**^ Renewal Variance Pee $75.00 (no change tram original application) After*the*Pact Fees (Doable application fee)I Site Address, S C n>. Pr<^rty Identification Humber (P.I.D.) Please check one ~ Property _ _ abstract or torrena? •ppllc.tlon if not Inclodod on ea * » APPLzcAar Same JArllftK) \z -rr^rr »6.-— Si;nf/ »r t I r -»applicant) Phone (bosa) Phone (work) City: \A)k^^A7A Zip;V Phone (home) i V • 4?^ I ehdr' r /\ ■ V V name Phone (work) Address:City: Pro|^r^3^< no^ Zip: TOB OP PIKiPBBTT Present Zoning District Present Use of Property DBSCRIPTIOH OP RBQOBST Residential Other- (specify) crilde request ine&cribe reqi VAR1AK»S RBQOIBBD Lot Area Kt Setback Y^^riances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) J 1 I 5 I % ¥ • $ 5BIPDescrib« undue iiardship or practical dlffleuity resulting fn enforcement of coning regulations;_ _ _atrict0GCR1PT1OM or ORI^UU. PROPSm OOHDITIOBSDescribe unusual property conditions prsvent^na cca^liance with Emilia Code T> qp’irenents;^_________ IKD SOWITTliLS Coeipleted Application Pors Certified Property 0«#ners List of owners within X50* (you mist obtain this list fron Bennepln County DepartsHrnt of Pinanco A-E03 Coet Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (110) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with prc^rty owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with prcqierty owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of an/ other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as nay be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remeaber that your variance application is not cc»plete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is cosiplete. Zoning Official's Signature_______ Date APPLICAMT'S 816HATQSB the applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is tuje and correct to the beat of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Dateaj/iAf omnots SIGMATOKB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this appli^tion and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council oiembers for purposes of investiga tion and verificat.'\ tlon and verif icat;^ni ef t^s/^qu^ty I Owner's Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City officei^is days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. m di *t * < ; 'V if1 1 *r/* I I 1 4 j d f’ "A t J r& m f'f \ 1 f I >i< »top«rtT 0«»m«r» la.t l«i »»•* r«9»r»e«* folut ■o»J liiien li-117-23 14 0003 jsaca 4 P*trlci* Don^®**® If§7 tmqmTfk999 Poiflt load Waytata, tm 55391 lt-117-23 14 0004 Man Opheia lf§5 WmqmTnmmu Point toad IliyBata# H 55391 18-117-23 14 0009 Charlaa Cfiriatiansan 1901 p«9«rnaaa Point Road Maysata« K1 55391 18-117-23 41 0001 Orvilla 8 Maxandra Piahar 1991 Pagarnaai Point toad Haysata^ KH 55391 - Ipplicatioa 11303, ■ rp > -.im % 0 V-. J m f 4 ■: r A-i. S: ! '.'T c; f r ' i « % ^ j C. 'CBTlFiO^ W IIMlli STJ^Tl C» HWWSOTA ) ) I 3 ••.COUWTT or HI CITT or 0*0110 n’r/.r; cVti?; 'h.vo7 mV,.* -11«» to tM .«.ch- n.t of property ewwirr in Mitnaoa Hh«r«o£, X har« h«r««»to »y h«n« hb^ •••* thia 7th day of July* It***■■ i '.<P ■"'•■' ^ % J P ' '. i :! j t. ir. I 'T! I % ■i . - ■-a* '•: I I '®. ■f>v % ^-'ll '•» 1 r Vii f i I V •» •, I»^**4W4. ••14MN* •- «»t%.4.ft* Jtg»Wl « —•€••< *« Ui * •*««' Bissusi. K Ik fimftomKpnt;««»*#•»«€ *. ««•»''«» •«M Cl^TEIl»»«-(Mu** *•#%. *t# # ••* itply to Saint Paul Office ho^m. (i t •oo «• 224-4911 June 15» I98t Hr. Allot Rezabak 1999 ra^arnasa Point Roa^l tfayzata* HR 55391 ia; Ordar of January 21. 1988 Ealatlns to tha Eatabliahaant of Judicial Boundariaa Daif H?. Razabalt: At your raquaat I hava revlawed tha Orlat of tha Court In thia •attar dated January 21, 1998. At you knoa. the Ordar iaauad by tha Court on that data related eolely to tha aatabllahetnt of judicial boundariaa. Aa you nay recall, the fiahara aipraaaly_ withdrew any objection or oppoaitioo they had to the eatabliahaant of the apacific judicial boundariaa ordered by the Court. Thera la abaolutaly nothinq In the Court*! Ordar which either expraaaly or ispliedly atatea that ancroachmenta, auch aa a fanca, becana tha property of the party on whoaa property the encroachMnta ware located. Thera ia therefore nothinq in tha Court*8 Ordar which in any way authoriiea or allows the abrupt tearinq down of any ancroachaenta by tha fiahara. I hope thia clarifies tha contents of tha court’s Order herein. Should you be in need of any further inforaatlon concerning thia oattar, please do not hesitate to let »a know Vary truly yoara, HESSIAN. NCKASY 4 SODllBIRC JAS:wn Jioea A. Stein ^;r u ■■ ■ '' J i • V i r ) j •iW ' r MP < • i i I 0 I .#.■* -"^03Hcssuji;$^1ast Ifik !SoptaMya y •» rn^mmm Ilia — mm mm m m^^rn • mmmti tm % mmrum^ m. m9mm€wmmm mm m m9mm *rn tam mwrn mm. :-m ^ rnmmmm* ftmmm-'-m*m-9‘- mmm mmi ^«k.ac«4»-4t».4«N#i m . ti>#a M»-«- ^ Jinairy 25, Xfit *mm. • • #•««€ ^ m f y m. m- 339>3004 I!r« Allan K#i«b«k 1989 Paf«r&«at Point Road Vayzata, KM 55391 Ra: ioundary Lint Raglatratlon Oar Pilt NO. S1024-0001 Mir Nr. Rtiabaiu Encloaad plaata find a copy of th« Ordor Mtoraiaing Boundarias which was filad with tha Ragistrar of TItlaa on Jinuify 21at togathar with a cartlfiad copy of tha lataat aurway chowing tha location of tha judicial aonuoants. Tha Ragiftrar of Titlaa haa tha Ovnara Duplieata Cartifical# of Titla, and X hawa raquaatad hia to updata tha duplieata to ahow all of tha filinga on tha original. It would ba adviaable for you to flla youf ContCftct for &aad with tha Ragiatrar of Titlaa. If you hava any queatlons, plaasa call. Vary truly youra, HESSIAN, RcKASY i SODERBlRO ^ • f ______ Rollin P. Wtjt RFW:cal670 Enca . CC: Jaoaa A. Stal.i, Bag.» -►-5, ; ■ ■ J r ■■ 1^; r-^ I . I 1 • I i I ti k\ J . ♦ I ( I ) J I <5 w PiocsEDoroi vumtqvnuFT HStsicT ooinrr mttcr oKoa A-tl7St iTATl or imflfGOTA or BnmiFOi in ttn ninttv erf tlM rtfltion of DAVID A. JOTl aad KAUM O. KITZ, For m Order Detcrmii^ loundftrtet. The ebov^^itterf me on fer beartiw'ea the ZS’®’to j it loom A-TtI «r the Hempin Cm«ify OomuBeit c^t ^ «kl Coynty «d Suu. l« th. Oty ef lfinne.^11,, A, \ ^ Eamiiw ol Ttu« to whoa seid matter h.. ^ Ally referrmj piirmmnt to ms,A. Seetkm SW.U, to beer Om mrtd«i^ te ^ «nd m e«etel— U^froa. «d ^ h.. »« c«». •>«tae -1, ««««d o» th. C«r. ^ B-----_ •vw«i« nAhieed by fb« petitkmer end tia ) ) ) ) ) ' —-------- —•» a-eiilKm^ UN S^nrt or R^>orts irf the Eiiminer, imin Tin. B '*** ”** m BOB tlw ra(ist«M ewian at kndi In c«rU/i~t. <rf T.U. «0. 4r«„ «.n„4 Oa „U. B, o, ,aa. rS^lT'* thnt fSSS toSlSli “wto. and ilMcrlbnd •< eomro^inS .t nl yomtatt Ibmto, nii SouUi.«Uriy Ilia of mid "? ” • ,“**”*»" “>• W«talV d^ttai tlaiad llii«at.ikruSS?S^tS^lwto Oa Bia. of tUce With a line <fc>awn Westariv It ^!°"5*.^*** «hora to its biterseetion th. octwr^SiT of SLtaniiii ?h 2SL* *» ««U« -a - from bofiiming. »^‘"nuie; tianco East to Ua actual point of O'- O'r -1 -FEE PAID S21I968 * -iti J I ^ ■# I Jr t 1 f i "I ^ifti, ih^ ^ nis^t. TliBt OD tte lui 6ty ol 6if«ia* ca loUrloeiitgry Order Drti ms dirseted to nark Ih* Hortfa^ly 9md SonUiarly bemlsry H um of tho promises tai ssM CmiT»ot« of Tilit by pisriaf MMol lamfiaififi said Ordv fwthor dboetad Mid earMyof to filo a plat of said sanroy atewtag tba loeatb» ol ciffi of m» Jodknal Laai^Mrlcs* eortinod as to fho loeotloo tbaraof. 3. That «o me fth day of Jammry, If••• such a Otrtinealo of Sorvoy was filid baeria aturain Mid Mrvayof iMrilficd tfait on the 81st day of Oaeanabar« IfSTt bo plaeed Mid Jadteial LMkdmam as Mosro oo nld nroey In aoootdMgf the dbootlva in Mid bdartoaitory Ordv. 4. TIet on tht tad day of July, ItM, lh«« WM fU«J on Mid Cartifieata of TlUt a nteinorial of Doesaoiil Ho. 1734M3 atOeli is a oartlfiad eopy of the Petitioo oq fito Ini tMi procoot&igs. f. That the Northerly boioidaiy of the abora-datcribod load abo aoratifutoi the Southerly bewdary ^ the land teMribad fai Cvtifkaia of Tiile Ho. fTlill. HOW, THEREFORE, IT B HEREBY ORDERED, as toUowa 1. That the Reftstrer of Titles, upon the fObig with him of e oertifiod eopy of this Chder and apoo Che filiiif ol a c^Uliad copy <4 tha Cartiliesta ol Sonray on fUa beraia Mowing the plaecment and location ol the Ju<fieiel Landmarks on DaeenMer 11, IM7, show by nenuxial on said Certificate of TiOa Ho 47S277 that tha Hortharly and Southerly boundary , lines ol the premises daseribad bi said Cartifieete here haan marked by Judicial Landmarks and that bi future Cartlfkatas of Title for the land daaerfi>ad in Mid CartifiMta, tha Registrar of Titles omit the memorial of Document Ho. 17S40iJ and the memorial of this Order, but that the Ragistrer of Titles shaU carry forward as e memorial on Mid future CartificatM of Title the certified eopy of the Cartifieete of Survey which Is filed irith this Order, and Mall carry in the body of Mid future OrtifieeU of TiUe as part of tha lagal d^^riptkm, tha following language: The Kortherly and Southerly boundary lines ol the above-* described lend have been marked by Judicial Landmarks set pw'suant to Torrens Case Ho. A-21759. S.That the Registrar of Titles shall receive lor filing on CerUficete of Title He 671812 e eerUfied eopy of this Order end shall Mow by memorial upon Mid Certifieata that the - 2 - s • 1 \ .t a it j ■■ V i; ■ f • ■ ^ ^ il. i’’ ^j0%: -Il« ^ o } A t* I / .4f>W C '1)oliMidMeHM in OtrtifientcSoctherif booidvy «T(TISIS Imi bMn Mvirad 1^ ^i^eta) t<na(iainrlct wt purmaat to Torma Cmw No. ns NwHgn on CoHiflonto ofDoeamot No.__________Omto inmrt Om tewnoatlium bf HorOi A Astoetntos, loe. dntod 21, iftn. Dntodi • J- -'V* ^ * '4 ¥i 5 j J ') - << .1 J ? / ^ ► F M 1F • It' .'V i » '1 c' 5 *'h ■;'l % iit" J / \ • % ' Hs-J- To*Pl«imiii9 CcnittioQ ChairMn Pl4tnnin9 COBElttloo Hent^ra City lUteinistrator Barnhardaoo Prafli Dates Sabjt JaanKC Kabosth, Building ft tcming bdainifttJrftiQr July 14, ifti • 1304 BicKard Blooaquiat/liick’a Super Valu/3313 Sfiorelim Drive Variances-Public Bearing toeiBf District o B-3 Pertieest Sectiees of thm ordisnice - Section 10.61 Subd. 3e, Street setback for existing pylon aign approxisately 20^ feet in height to be relocated aa a result of County Road iaprovemit. Required * 10* rxisting - 10*4 Proposed • 3*^ Variance • V or tOl Section 10.42 Subd. 7d Section 10.61 Subd. 5b ~ Street Setback for Parking Required • 20* (lavarre District City has Rllowedl 10*1 Proposed • 0* Variance • 20* or lOOt Section 10.61 Subd. 4f - Parking Spaces - Sise of Parking Area Required Proposed Total area required for storage olua backout aaneuver Proposed Idst of Sxhibits - 9* 8 20* i*6* X 20* 300 sq. ft. 3S3 sq. ft. h - Application B - Property Owner’s IList C - Plat Map D - Applicant*# Written Position to County and City E “ Applicant*# Stateeent of Hardships P - County Road 15 ft 19 laqprovesienta and Dedication of Additional Right-of-Way G - Existing Parking Plan with 9* x 20* Stalls H - Proposed Parking Plan with 8*6'* x 2C* Stalls Review of Current Application Both the Public Works snd Zoning Staffs have met at least two times out on the site to discuss the effects of the additional acquisitions of right-of-way by the County for the improvoments and upgrading of County Roada 15 and 19 with the Navarre Soper Valu representatives. The additional right-of-way to be taken from the Super Valu property totals 8,127 sq. ft. This acquisition along the North and ■M. •a''. J ' * /' \ Zoning File #1304 July 14, 19tl Fage Two of ThrooEast border* of the property have bad a eajor iepact on the Super Valu parking area requiring the re*ova 1 of liS eaiatiiig atalla* Both the County and the City ataffa have reviewed the new location for the esiatlng pylon aign. They find no problea with the alghting diatance at the corner because of the height of the aign and the fact that it is placed at least 1C* to 12* out of the travelled right-of-way of the roadway* because of the width of the walking path and boulevard area. Once again both County and City staffs see no problen with the locatiwi of the parking area couencing at the aero setback line. The County haa agreed to install a )* bltuwlnoua curb between the parking area and the ceMnt walk. The buaper will aerve to provide the additional area for the overhang of the car buwpera along eaat and north lot lines. The applicant awat explain the hardship that would requi»'e the reduction in area of the required stall site at V x 20*. Review the required parking atandards below: Total area of structure ■ 14,144 sq. ft. (reduce by lOi for hallways, offices, non-coa®ercisl/wsrehouse storage areas • 15,178 sq. Requirad parking for net floor area 15,174 aq. ft. of retail space 1 stall for each 150 aq. ft. of net t loor sren 9* X 20* Stslls - «*5* X 20* Stslls - Required Existing Proposed Proposed 101 Stalls 122 Stslls 107 Stslls 114 Stalls The 9* X 20* plan clearly satisfies the required nusber of stalls for the use. Staff has discussed the spplicsnts request to reduce the required stall size to 6'5* x 20* with the engineer. Cook has stated that it doss work when it is necessary to tighten up on parking areas and it ^ uiually carried out by double striping the sides of the lisited stall. The double stripes force the driver to tighten up within the parking ares. needed? Staff has never received s report of any problew with the parking not setiafying the existing use level. If at aose tl«a in tha tht applicant has definite expansion plans, then staff would advise that we reconsider the request to reduce the stall sits. Staff would also auggast that there is additional area within the far aoutheast corner of the property that could be developed into additional parking. Also be aware that the City is looking at the posaible redevelopment and rezoning within the area of Navarre and thia may result in a more comprehensive plan to provide additional parking within the downtoi^n area of Navarre. Staff Recommendation - Staff would recommend approval of the setback variance of 7' for the relocation of the pylon sign, to approve the zero foot setback for the parking area adjacent to the north and east lot lines. J N *• \ ir ft :v toning fiU #1304 Jaly 14, 19I#Pag* Thr*« of Thre« and to teo^rarily deny the applicant** raquaat for a variance that would raduc* the raqulrad parking atall aiie, htaad upon tha following findlngsi 1. The location of the aige will not craata a sighting problaa for any of tha oscrs of tha intaraactlon of County Bond If ai^ 15. 2. The location of tha sign will ne»^ present a safety hasard to the users of the public roadways. 3. The parking area will in reality be separated by the county roadways by approxlaataly !€♦ feat. 4. Tha County will provide a one foot buffer so that car* will not hang out over tha walkway adjacent to the north and east lot lines of the Super Vain parking lot. 5. Tha loss of sow* S,127 sq. ft. of parking lot area has created a major hardship for the applicant. The need for the setbacks ha* been crMted not by ft intonftft us# of th# proporty# bot by an iMMdiftto ncodl to iwprova the intersections of 15 and If in Vavarre. 6. Applicant's requsat for an f*4* s 20* atall aisa may be premature and until a formal request for an addition or expansion in the use of the property is receivsd, th* City will postpons any action on this phaae of the variance application. IN' J ■."•'VL \ - I^ ICITT OF ORC - VARIASCK UPPLICA I i-1 f ‘•» f*Initial Application Fee $150.00($50.00 per each additional variancel Renewal Variance Fee $75.00(no change from original application)After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee).»4 • f fc- » •* ."rrr-r^ a 'Ufc. a ^ k.k\» • weA. /k.- >1 T'»r“‘ Va W V PBOFBRTT LOCATlOa Site Address 3 A.. aw\ v;? f.'f .«<•: ry^cj /?£. aJ mac4^i /fjfj ssrs9^ ■ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) j' —// Please check one - Property abstract or tcrrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on rec[uired survey. APPLICAMT Name Address Phone ihoaw) -fr<y 7i^ ^ Phone (work) ' ^7! *<fVZ J • i07P> IjOiOCif__________ Cityi ^^lt/^ Zip? 5’S/Jf^ <0RlI0l (if different than applicant) Name >^/^gjb)n Phone (home) Address:'S2£:V37 City Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRB8BHT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property /T-3 Rgyldenttel Other (specify) DBSCRIPTION OP RJ T Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: j I ii 4«’/rt m-i Ml 1 m BASDSHIPDescribe undue hardship or practice difficulty resulfreal strict p t . enforcemen^,of ton^g regulations Or iZi*J^IDBSCRIPTIGH OP DHOSOAL PBOPBITir COHDITIOMS Describe unusual p^per^ conditions preventing c«ipliance with Zoning Code Rea;uireaents;.^y xa>«y^^pr ^ /ase*~^ ■. ■■ 1 ^ - t •al 4. 5. 6.15^ 7. 8. IRBD SUMITTALS Conpleted A(:^lication Fora Certified Property Owners X<i8t of owners within 150* (you nust obtain this list froai Hennepin County Departaent of Pinance A-403 Govt Center 340-3271). Staraped* legal sised envelopes (110) pre-addressed to each of the nanes on the above list with no rdturn address (use address labels obtained with property oimers list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property o*mers list). As an addencum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as s»y be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICAMT'S SlCHATfttB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information suppliew 4* .true andy^orrect tg the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ^yUA-Date OWtrKRS SIGIIATDSB / / i ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J Desi; oi •i I 4 u:- > y ?!'£ ■ > *■ ♦ ■<* fi h _ *'V / '•2i5 % i I I 4l ■ “ •*CO0 o3 4^ S € ihii«i :i|£ ssN *3®«i s Ij5 r_\ iiiis •^1 ? s*^ sS S m izz H J5 C t t i S{ 1Ii i 3 i 31J S:^ 1 i * #» ir^ r-Ji:.,... ‘ ^ ♦ I * r' (t |ililSi*> ^ m m mii-M 7 J 5 ^ 1» SZ M r* M <!«imSiS5»- Sj- 4'*•- -i 9f I f mrnt9m M ^ r* r- r*in K « m^ m *i *«i ^ «» I m in y« Ki I E9 O mm MiSE ^ S 2 S S i"!SEHli'?j:i ?««fit H f« «1^ 551'* wa Ss«» i S3SS «4 ^r-*asmh aa iSiSS* ^ M ^i> *^ r* Z •• 5?r ? s ii s_ 3 S'*sIP M ilH|=il sMi|*iVnlrims»SA M 8 83 1 = fS SiSJIi* z *« ** »-5 ^ IP M < O «4 «4 iHi m iz M SM 8 II «« IIif MiIP m Pi ;c IIPins!8=s|*Sl*r?3 •»iifiSJltir niiiim-n i*«n 5 8 *i! 1= 82 iPSpJ5aa*a *;ii=8 i ^8 = {. pPhsls!S.:ai^ 1I^Lif p* PI ^ r* • M ftSS.S* ?Sln!. M 4<8 - mhIw M IMI ISS88S♦ P»l®IS*s *5i 8 S !?ii|= is8i 3 ii!ii'i*8i3MM!si 5?-|l »|S li :s9Sas>* *S-,=fiilils <1 S2 33 88 •• I I m M (9 t ff9mm i sem^V is Ms ^ c.(I J f... i^y- mi- s 4; .ft1:• , »• ;«l • 8. It 10 ^v'uo, tiii «* <\t‘t i; -I. •v f n < tr IS» ^ & ^ i\ rijr A ^ m \ f • , »• to tl :♦)! -'.^V ~ " ^9%-! '" \» 1 *• t 2« xt !• I 1 ¥ I i ; *t '§ , • ^ T 1 4 \ *,• 4 ,* TpiV^ ,:.f"’■ 'ty)'i —^.4-^<i- 0--^-l-.^----*_- LJf- A-». I ^1 ^ I ^ -^'i> li^; !«• to jli ' tt tr tlT. \*i\ 1 i.v ' ^‘ I • ^5T!^^5"'''3’’"2? ^ 2. i •—> . *“ V• Mi«> I r'’.; If- **• « «■ Tv- •-'’«. >v *'r" • • V' M-V A » P i ( C 0 V t L ^ 1.426-^ ,1-- « ^APpLE-“K!yC?li :i^7 ____Lo ‘ 0*1 j I■■■-Viti t r■ - V m »• 'V; I 41 •HWl^ij ime 1. \m Us. Oeannt flabusth Bylldln^ and Zofilrm; iftdninistratiof) "•SIS Brown Road Sooth Qrofio. m SS32S Ofip Ns. Nahusth: thf attachod drawlns will clarify My position on pafklnf it ay placi of busInass Mi discossad at our previous neeting. In ordar to «ax1n1zt ny parking due to the Kannapin County condaanatlon of 8,127 s.f. of ay parking lot, I hava reduced the width of the stalls frca 9 ft. to 8.S ft. In order to further enhance ay parking ratios, I ttould till for your approval of the following: 1. Waiver of any landscaping or greenspace rtquirtd by ordinance. 2. Waiver of any setback requiraaents on the parlaatar of ay leased property bordering on County roads 15 and If. Essentially allowing parking to the newly established property line. 3. that a bituminous curb be Installed on the property line for the safety of ay custoacrs and the local residents who will be using the sidewalk for walking and recreational purposes. Furtheraore, that Hennepin County Incur the expense of the placement of the safety curb. 4. To enhance the maintenance of the buffer area, I would suggest that the 5 foot concrete sidewalk be placed near the roadway and that the bituminous surface be Installed on the Inner portion of the buffer area. Please expedite this matter In your approval channels and thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact me at 471-8473 on any questions you may have. Slnc^ely Ick BloomquIS' Rick's Super Valu R6:1Ja U J .-ST'Sm R 1 f 7/ji ,jtetct*7!u ^ j4C J jSujt yu. >v '--^m t ♦ ¥ % % * f r ,i m \ a 1 *“’-' 2) • J it j I t • «l f i 4 : f N R f«4mm V • l»# - J 1 ik4- ftef Otttfti FlAfinlng rnani«iNlnn rftAfriRAn fTelley Orono Planning CoMission Iteabars City Adninistrator EernliardaonJaanna A. Habyath« Building ft Zoning Adainiatrater July 14 r 1988 #1305 Naahington Scientific, Inc. 2605 flaat Wayfata toulayajrd * Conditional Uae Paimit • Public Raariiig Bdaittg District * Industrial Zona Partiaant Ordi: Section 10.03, Subdiyision 19 Applicant aaaks a Conditional Una Parait to placa 10,000 cubic yards of fill to tha vast and aoutharn parts of the property. Praliainary soil tasting ahotfsd that tha underlying soils of tha proposed addition recently approved by tha City were poor and could not be used as raplacmant soils. The Council granted paraission to tha applicant to stock pile the excess soils until resolve of tha foraal Conditional Use Permit application. Mst of Sshibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B > Exhibit C “ Exhibit 0 “ Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H > Exhibit Z Exhibit J > Exhibit K “ Application Property Owners list Plat Map MCND Permit Application MCWD Latter 6/27/88 Pallansch Latter 7/1/88 Cook Letter 7/12/88 Municipal Wetlands Map watershed Map Grading Plan for Site Site Plan Bewiaw of Application - On January 12, 1988 WSI had a formal ground breaking cereaony for the 175* by 187* addition already approved by the City. As applicant advised in review, they sought permission to stock pile approximately 10,000 cubic yards of fill to be excavated from the sub area of the proposed addition. The approximate area of the stock piling per the submitted grading plan. Exhibit J covers approximately 100* by 600* along the west border of the property. As Mr. Vogt, the architect for the applicants noted the area to receive the fill slopes abruptly from the west property line. The abrupt bank will be made into a more gentle slope and would improve the drainage in the rear portion of the site which applicant claims is now poorly drained. An inspection at this time of year, given the very dry season, nothing appears poorly drained at this point. The more graduated slopes will indeed slow up drainage during heavy run-off. As Glenn Cook asked in the earlier review of the grading plans, the berming has been shown to the east of the stock pile and continues along the south border to the drainage outlet at the southeast corner. Note the drainage from WSI drains down to the railroad track eastward to the outlet at the lake, review Exhibit I. 4 mI- • ■Mm . • I *» r* mm J fiI I I -Wk ■ ‘ - - •* •* /y 1- * • 'i f ij 1 :i i Zoning Pile §1305 Page 2 of 3The epplicant*! grading plan shove that a 10* level grade vill be ■nlntained along all sides of the stock pile. Staff would note that additional erosion control aeasures Bust be SMintalned while the lOrOOO cubic yards is stored in the stock pile. Erosion control should be naintalned at a ainiaua along the east, south and north of the stock piles. Applicant say select either staked hay bales or silt fence. In Glenn Cook's report. Exhibit G, he also advises that silt fencing should be placed near the southeast corner of the property to protect the downstrean waterway. This should be installed prior to the cosstencestent of the larid alteration. Planning COaaisslon sMsd>ers may resmsber that the applicant was advised to file the required MCVD permit application. Exhibit B, Mr. Larson noted the usual districts concerns in developments of this type. Briefly to review, he states the quality and quantity of run**off shall not be changed, erosion control to prevent transport of sediments off^site during and after construction and prompt restoration of disturbed areas with seed and mulch or sod. In Mr. Pallansch's letter. Exhibit F, he notes no real concern on Mr. Larsons part regarding the effects of the proposed addition on the site and suggests no major requirements will be made of the applicant as a result of the improvement. He also notes that they will follow all rules of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. We will ask Mr. Pallansch for any preliminary directives given to him by Mr. Larson at our meeting. Cook's report suggests the need for a siltatlon pond at the southeast corner of the property. The engineer has not suggested a specific sise for the pond in his report, but has noted to staff that it should be approximately 1/2 to 3/4 of an acre and noted in addition, that it would be very advisable for both Cities to construct a retention or sediments pond between the shared lot lines. Staff would suggest that the City and the applicant work closely with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to determine the appropriate size of such a retension pond. Staff Bspfessendstiop To approve the Conditional Use Permit application of Washington Scientific, Inc. for the property located at 2605 West Wayzata Boulevard that would permit the temporary stock piling of 10,000 cubic yards to be used in the final grading of the western elevations of the property per grading plans by the Vogt Corporation dated 5/19/88, revisions 6/29/88 based on the following findings: 1. The proposed temporary stock piling and alteration and final grades proposed by applicant will be in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. 2. That the proposed temporary stock piling of fill and the final grading plans proposed would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed Conditional Use Permit complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter requiring no variances to the required standards. a * J { i ,*• W. af- i % ; 4 e I i 3 ..I r t. BA * .% f irV. ■ ■.■Si;' ■M jr * g' ' iiif i ^ ^ IV / f ) 'i *i J I I ‘ •% { 3 i ? ! '■i Zoning Pile 11305 Pege 3 of 3Approval la eubject to the following eoiMlitlofiat1. Silt fencing to be placed at the aoutheaat comer of the property prior to cOTstmction in order to proteot the quality of the run-off entering the downatreaa waterway.2. Stock piles to eaintain 10* level area around bate and place additional eroaion control along aouth, eaat» and north aidea of the atock pile. 3. The area where fill ia placed aiuat be aeeded aa aoon aa the final gradea are approved by the City. 4. Applicant to work with the City and the IfCWD to deteraine the approximate aiae of aedia^nt pond to be inatalled in the aoutheaat corner of the property. Ibi-v J I * ♦. * PRBSBVT OSB OP PI^MtTYPresent Zoning DistrictPresent Use of Property Residentialjti Other t ®P®ci£y)OBSCRIPTIOH or nQOBSTDescribe recruest in detailt ____^excavated earth - r»e f .— iIq sarced nanrnTim.itelv in.rKvi ,3^2 ~ ftaalilas liflB anti cnrrefrinn rrprattnne - —■gUfi B( the Bsiiring arnnrrtv in order '*"*Aa of the RB 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 'lUD 8UBNITna.S Cosipleted Application Form. Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain Center 3V8-3*2Tlf^°”***^” County Department of Finance A-603 Government sited envelopes (#io) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of su.'vey. Topographic survey (existing and ^^roposed contours) If land • iterations involve changes in elevation «gradc^s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements).Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is”cOTpleteT~’ Zoning Officials Signature __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGHATORB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Knowledge. r-^ /—\ /< ^ 1.^ MApplicant's signature V- / Date OWNERS SIGNATURE ; i / ^ The owner hereby ac)cno%Mcdge8 and agrees to this application and further reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, JvestU.t?or«7?erifTaUon VtW P“P°*« «>* Owner's signature Date fiffiSWiSSSil Office of this cLnse prio? to“'he‘’mle?iJS.'^ advise the Building s Zoning J ■m «fI \ .-! ?- ’'V** f‘ 'Ski -. « . •^'•-T'i-:.'. V.-’ ; ..A f®''' *■ ' ii ‘ly. 'li ;l|iMil I ESSis*|g i* M I 8 «0i OI I 9* M = 8 88 S liiS fs» S<S3 **33 V( M sil rt M W — -m o m *S5 88 S wIimi8^ rm 9 9 KH r- TIPIR8®!!U't |S6i es M i:*2*§i Wf w« ♦a = 8 M »r« yi -8 s 88 = |3iE BS33 vl 9$ ••a i* Mi M 8 M U Mg 88 oo jiii * r- f •• "2 *g Hi 8 18 ► f- •niC5? SSs 88 8 *i§ a*a S--:8f IPw Mi 8i 8 = s ^ _ <» 5- *< 3 at / 9 £V |5|3>83. B~ r M HI I B. «s iSils*•• mmg'«» 2 _ PI ^ • IP Ul ► m s: : r # 1111? i !r*it 888mI i-ls.j *31? i?ii” itVP ►* (to* i” aE S3 _ IP iS*8 ?t yj<il8 *1 ( » i* •1 V U i v» 7t ‘4. ■ ^ ■t ^ » ft 1 J « V « Pi» -i.J- Vr .. i m i » ; •' r » I i % • fl it J fl * i*f -^.♦ “ - #^- * jr^ i « » ►- • ,. :1p»- flfc '■■•. I ^ * JW fy Piyf s im|5j|I®r srmiB-a 88 i fi i 8 Ol tm 1» fi r•it!ST••s 3 i.i 1 f j <■ ■ V "tf ■•i ■i-i. it. ‘ V 1^' ^ ■^■': :.^^, t r ' - i JV- . 5f*^ i. « ' (► • % f M »i *. I t K.i t i' V 'y ;v :,.w N’Sh m :• ■ a , ,; ■* * '4 **i '■ .*■ I MMNEHAHA CI^CK WATEH8HED msTiacT P.O. ■«■ M7miyzita, iWniwipm fSWf (FOR OFFICC U» ONLY) RsrnMl Jtppaeatkjn No. __________Sc««#9in<Sa Dal* Am.lCAtlON FOR FtlRRT (P9 Mgl TNa LmR 2€05 N«st Wayzata Blvd, PO Box 340 Long Laka MR 55356 473-»1271 JoR 2605 W. RaYiatjL-aiYd Long Laka m 55356 □ P£. □ ULS O i A. fiomaf a P»mil Racpjezlad Pgr: (Chacfc Al Appiopnate B®«*) 6i Stormwaiir Manigamant Plan C Comtfmatt E) kidustriat □ kwtitutkjnal of Highway □ PUisi<3«i!tat C □ Fkxx^Main Aktration C Pro,«l uo«tion: J . |S> OfJ|g .1....33^_1_UM 0. O WWiand AHaflBoni E. U OraOgmg f. □ Shorafina/Barat knproven»m Q. □ ^marndJlai CrotRog 131— 5. Daseriba tha Project:Add 32,000 sq.ft, addition to present building a If This Project Requires Municipal Approval or Review. Attach Oocumantlon of Municipal Rtview: 7. Body of Water. Stream or Wetland Affedad by Rurwff From This ®ite: __________________ Distarrce From Pitted: Long Lake 1) - 2 miles 18. Schedule For Construction. Imple men tation of Temporary Erosion Contrds, Subdintiai Completkxi and Restora- tinn’ Building permit July 18/86 for City of Orono -. . .. _ _ _ _ _ Complete date October 1/88._ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Please call (612) 473-4224 if assistance in completing this form is required In submilling this form, the applicant acknowledges all requirements tor permit approval as determined by the published Rules dated February 20,1986. Form PA 06 I4 r V : i ■ ;• 0-^ J r ■>pMINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICTP.0, tel M7, Wiizita, MiMima SSlf 1ft• Mtsmt JBAt 27. 1988 t-/'r Ji«28see -----------1 fir. Joe Fallinscb, Facilltlts Engineer Mishiogton Scientific Industries 260S M. Utyznte ftoulcvard Box 340 Long Like. Hiimesota 5S3S6 RE: Bunding Mdition Dear llr. Fallansch: $ I have revieMed the inforaation you subaltUd concerning your koildlng expansiwi in Long Ldie. The project trill re<|uire penalt review «idl approval by the Board of Managers of the MCUD. SoM of the District's concerns in develc^aents of this type incltuie that: 1. The rate of stonarater runoff froa the site shall not increase as a result of the proposed developaent. This criteria shall be analyzed and oet for runoff producing events with return fre<pwncies froa one to 100 years. 2. The quality nf sUfTMater runoff leaving the site after development shall he equivalent to runoff quality for the existing condition. Riis criteria shall be analyzed and aet for runoff producing events with a retur frecptency of one year. 3. appropriate erosion control aethods are in place to prev«it the transport of sediaents off site during and after construction. 4. Pr(»npt restoration of the disturbed area be coapleted with seed and auTch or sod. The dealdine for the July aeeting is <hi1y 11. 1988. I have included a copy of the rules for your infomation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK m ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District Kevin C. Larson. Engineer cc: Board U^i th entity of Qrono J j:;-. -r;\ - W’'‘A) ■ 11 • V 1I v ■I% « * I •/ ■T-; « > ^ i?pii] * ^»• ♦ \ ' 4 ^ w- • • • »t^ ' *%<.'■««-S«®J«ly 1. Iffl %I Mr. lam Jacoibm City of Ori P.O. lea M Crystal Bay S532B Dost Tosi» Tys bstn OQ ciM phena with Mr. Ksvla Larsoa of Hic|o|i tosoclatsa oa our VstsrsBa4 District p«r«ic. Tbs Vast Corporation and ayaalf bava m aasting July ft to oYsr requlraaanta. Vc will apply by July 11 ftaadliot for thalr July 21 rcYicw. I bars spokan with Mr. Larson on two occaaloaa and bo tts no iarga rsiiuiraMnts for our aits bacauao of our propsrty aiaa* Washington Sciantlfic will follow all of tho lulaa of tba Hinnsbaba Creek Uatersbad District. Sincerely. Pallansch ,^cllities Engineer /«jf Attachswnts cc: E. A. Hickok ft Aaaociatca Inc. Vogt Corporation WASHINOTON SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. 2605 W. Wayzata Bird. • Bos 340 • Long Laka, Minnaaola 65360-0340 • Phona 612/473-127! a TWX: 610^576 2742 J ‘ ► 4 - • . V ( » ► i V . •* V. Ij-v I i I : I V-■? '1 tf i 4 I; ii, •f if i • V I. V ^ ( <r t l; '» 1/^ I Bonestroo Rdseneits AnderfUc & ^1 Associatesinginetfji A AfthUcctt CM 6 C• C t 4' i » IfIfPi Pi f«<ircA,A PiIfPt Pi pf Pt Cti» «iM «•A PfPf ft A '! to pf Pi 1A tUMPll-A Pf Ial7 12. IfII City of Oro^ Box 66 Cryital B«y. KH 55J23 Atte: Jc«on« Habuith B«: 139-1305 Vaahingtea Scientific Ine 2605 W«ft WeyxAiui Blvd. <D««r Jc«nn«: t« liCTe rcYinred the pica labmitted on the Veehiagtra Scientific project. The plea provide# for placement of excavated Mterial along the tfeit aide of the ^he Mterial can he leveled out and left ia Chia area in accordance with an approved plan. In our previoua review we indicated that drainage ahould be iaproved away froa the propoeed building addition. Ve vould elao raedeincnd that « ail tat ion pondi be conatructed at the Southeaat corner of the property. The eyee where fill ia placed should be aeeded as aooa as poaaibl* after the work ia conpleted. Silt fence ahould be placed near the aouthcaat corner of the property to protect the downatrcaa waterway. Yours very truly. SQHESTtOO. E03EH1, AKDEILIK 4 ASSOCIATES, IWC. /ccX Glenn g. Cook CRC:kj 9686£ 233S MMest Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612*6364600 J ki '■M* < Pi s t o f. n % *■ - «V ■V >1l V v;. " .1 • % f ♦ ■■ ^ ; . iii,.; >;.■#, . ; Vos city Adolnistrator BornhardsonDotesJeanne Mabuath, Deildin^ * Zoning Mpiniatratop July 13, lf888ebj[f •quale 30,300 sq. ft. treal. Area of aubject pro^rty S?“et“*V. -*5icrrVulr«Yc'on"tVoM 2"*^; ’■*' S"»‘«Station on . r..ld.nti.l pr^rtr teioinil in.t.ll a lift Waste Control Coamilsilon dwU with a^imV.r«L »*«^ro **' above ground hatch and !'««♦■*•«i ^ ound wet well and valve vault property. The current Application iSioli«f*r,f^ on the adjacent earina Application and aaks for ^roval o/a ?1 V 20 « »«'J»ent of the original to be placed to the i«»edXte ea.t of th* atatlon/lift atation that the earina property and the reaidwn<>i>i P^’operty. Pleaae note ownerahlp. ^ ^ ^ >^«*i<5«ntla 1 property are under the aace c.rr.ntl, ,on«l w-ic-l r„a ,ubj.ct to Street Setback - Required A ProposedActual Traveled Roadway Setback Variance 30' S' 40* 25* or 831 Rear Setback -Required Proposed Variance 30' 25* 5* or 171 Street Setback - Side/Rear Setback to Residential Lot Lines Required - 50» Proposed - 5' Variance 45* or 90i Required - 50* Proposed - 25* N. Side/N. Rear Lin#Variance Proposed Variance " 25* or 50% 10* East Side Lot Lin© 40* or 80% ‘ S f' % Ijp R 0 d 2 b P m. w. 1 s< T1 d P a| T1 cl pi C( n< p; P> t] pi Ii St n< v< c< ; y % <«■ a •ji foning File fl30€ July 13« 1911 Page 2 of 3Met of Bafeibite - A * Application B - Property Owner's List C - Plat Map D - Cook Letter B - HffCC Letter to City F - NWCC Letters to TobefBann G - Site Plan B - Pee Title Purchase Sketch plus Description X *■ Perpetual Access Base&ent and Tesporary Construction Baswsent Sketch and Description J - Elevation of Lift Station K Site Plan/Profile Lift Station 44 Approved in Appl. 1256 Review of Current Appllcetion - As Applicants addenduss E and F advise, the original proposal for an undergroumS valve vault and pusqp station had to discarded in place of current proposed punping station/lift station 32* x 20*. The current owner of the marine did not wish the marina property to be cluttered at the southeast corner of the property and asked that it be placed in the southwest corner of the residential property adjacent to the marine property. Mr. Toberman has a contract for deed for the property with the current owner Mrs. Straley. The structure will be approximately 11 feet high, located 20 feet from the residence that is now located on the sane property. The MWCC plans to remove the current gray structure in a serious state of disrepair, addressed at 3260 North Shore Drive, and will relocate the present resident’s in another facility. For the review of the current application, Planning Coaaisslon has but two standards to review: 1. That the subject public service structure must be located 50 from residential zoned property. feet 2. That the architectural design of the service structure be compatible with the neighborhood in which it Is to be located. The difficulty for this review is that the subject area is scheduled for change in use and change in zoning so that the current residential will be phased out. Is the 32* x 20* brick structure with an 11 foot height compatible with either the B2 or residential neighborhood? The staff would note that the current site plan does not show landscaping as the other site plans provided in Application #1256. The staff would suggest that the MWCC provide landscaping adjacent to the Structure. Care should be given so that any landscaping proposed around the structure not create a view problem with access to the County Road. In the process of reviewing the application with the City Engineer, the staff questioned the need for fee ownership. Indeed, if fee ownership was needed for parcel that the building is to rest upon, then we are dealing very definitely with a subdivision of the property. The entire parcel consists of 30,300 sq. ft. and the parcel to be divided off is 2,880 sq. . A m* k- ♦ . IonJulFagft.1stfeeof Ns. adz nec app Aug wou The ft. spe Btr the own for bee Sta tafc sub 15t The Pla loc for the the pro Pla of ask tra env for per def: J •4,, IV I - ^4. “ ■ : ->■<-»•' '* 4 r • Zoning Fll* 91306 jQly 13, 19lt Page Thrae of Threaft. Gian spoka aith Xiatbarly Eckhar<St of tha HNCC and she advisad that an eaaemant coold aarve thea teaporarily and than flla for tha aubdlvision latar in tha aonth. Gian also advisad Ms. Eckhardt that tha City would not faal obligatad to approva a futura subdivision of a substandard lot bacausa of tha original and earlier approval of the project over tha easesent area. MS. Eckhardt followed up with a call direct to na tha following day, advising that tha attorneys of tha MMCC noted that fee ownership was necessary for this type of structure. Ms. Eckhardt will file a Subdivision application with the City, h public hearing would be scheduled for tha August ISth SMMting. The currant Zoning District requires half an acre in area, or 21,780 sq. ft. Upon division of the land, the regaining property would consist of 27,420 sq. ft. Tha real issue for the subdivision will be tha creation of the 2,880 sq. ft. parcel containing the lift station. Tha MMCC say be asked to execute special agreesients with tha City that upon vacation of, or disuse of tha structure that they would be responsible for rasK>ving the structure and that said land aust be returned back to tha original underlying fee ownership. Such a resolution would deesi the subject parcel unbuildable and for the exclusive use of the lift station by the MWCC. Ms. Eckhardt has been advised that we would require a foraal plat of tha proparty. Staff Eecoaaiendatioii - The staff would suggest that the Planning Cooimission table all action on the current Conditional Use Permit until the subdivision application is presented at the public hearing for the August 15th meeting; then proceed with comprehensive action on both applications. The MWCC representative should be advised at your July 18th meeting as to Planning Commission membera* concarna regarding either tha proposed location, design, setbacks, etc., of tha proposed Conditional Use Permit for the lift station and any other concerns not cited by staff regarding the proposed subdivision. The timing of this project la most important to the MWCC and any unnecessary delays may impede the commencement of tha project this year. 1. In regard to the Conditional Use Permit for the lift station, tha Planning Commission may wish to relocate the structure more than 5 feet off of the designated right-of-way of the County Road. Applicant should be asked why it has been placed 5 feet, although actually 40 feet from the traveled road right-of-way. 2. Should the parcel be larger and deeper providing a greater building envelope for the structure? A Landscape Plan should certainly be provided for our August 15th Review. 3. What about parking needs for this structure - how often will persons be responsible for visiting the site. Parking area has not been defined on the site plan? 4. Any other comments of the Planning Commission. * • p * % ^ ♦ j - V---? V t •M k • % ' # tjCij*ftCITY or oraR> • cnmuo. uum use applPItOrBRTT LOCETlCm _fSit« Address ^ SHORE DR., WAY2ATA {OROHO 55123) 55391Froperty Identification Humber (P.I.D.) 8**117-*023-"44-0003X‘Please check one ~ Property ^ abstract or(for Conditional Use Applications only)torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICAIIT Metropolitan Haste Control Marne Commission Phone (hcffiiel 230 B. 5th Street Address gt-. Pani un Phone C%rork)612-222«8423 City ____________*iP. OmflBI (if different than applicant) Marne Rita H. Siraley Phone (home) Phone 542-1189 Address 1460, 600 S. SP» Rd.18 Cl ip_iil^ 12/4/84Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _**/ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - COHDITIOMAL OSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Instituticiial (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) CoiTunercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule <m R APPLICATIONS $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals I Ir- t j 1 W4f w ■ > 'Vi- i* > • % ' I a ! B 1 2 6 7 8 T r n A T r u t k O T a a i: O' A] P t r« ui ai O: V 7- ■■ mr ^ ‘ - • V # . t ♦ #♦ % ' PRESEMT OSE OF PB0PEST7Present Zoning District 1^06'^<■ >ResidentialPresent Ose of Property ResidentialOther (specify)DESCRIPTION OP RIQOBSTDescribe request in details Request variance of 50' residential setback and 30' right-cf-way setback for CCTlStrTJeTTOn'"OT""l'F’Wage P'JRprK‘5 ItSflTih. Existing houikP to be ffemoYed iihd Replaced by brick gcHeraTlor’ BUtlfllTTCr”" 2. 3. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list iron Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stafnpedf legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grides). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, r.'lease attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified rf this application. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The applicant and Property Owner rau.«c sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Departmenv that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature fe. Payne Aasisfa Date Enai'hee/inq e Jsistant Director of Engi'heefing OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Orrice of this change prior to the meeting. fMmiliili j f. < A • ■% Ll i: m- m ir Is : ^ I fj *• ^ % ' » a f f- •V ■ ? f# '■ ^ • I I |HIl»if >s «<1=ssg19ll^Zts£|lsa* o*5'"3 im z ^_ » ► ► g w n < m t Mi 2 H Missii,:r-i 3* • M M « •M _ O •iO Jl M 'SS34SS^ r* f^ p m m ^5x**^S> O » 2.8 r "S 8- PIm m S8 M , * ^ ^ / 3: ^ 7 :ix o M > M M 5 ssiis.a ** f- -* » ZIt-Q I m ■ X X M 3 *tl Nl X l«4»sir»* -i ij|* M r^ o in O “S” i; Mi ••V--4 H ?5 n M -is :S3 S ? IP#«o « « o M M 1-4 Mi i» -4 » » ^ ' 3 3 Qi IMl Ml «• -• -4 X « » M C X ► » S If- r- -4 f# l«* ■'# !U. Mi-< <n Si8 Clm 4» o S'* JC W 3 3 2S ^ M C t_ M V«M M Mi Ql r- o* X -i p* ? s ► • •m► 9N «-#r‘*ili4SS9(s,^5-1 i||^: ; is !Til=»C o C a « ? •-• S *5'-i! 1 W OP *-4 ^ •,S!:2ir X iP# #* 5 3 » X Mi ip> s u #:i I: Is -- sx 9 'Mi (SS3S8aS?P!«: ► r- ir* I# o S|5p ? **:C5r .iiS2= 5"28|- 3 /m m S / ^ --------- i|lri¥¥2fi?S5» f ««§•-» 53S5 w m -8 w\l- ?\:= f5V v"*. XmH|| *5'-|S8f Mi O H Ml X ISi 8 S H f P# Mi PH f-4 2 15 HI IC I iS“*SS f • HI 3 M4 S 8 # #Hsi^iS3 Mi 0(0 • M#5 ^ ^|r Mi yi•* m ff-* H ll HI •-»!# 4P M*ll!iS 8 85^IH m oa s r»f 3 I* 3M M* Mi Wi o • * #•I > n ¥ I / • #I X % .j W’ rfsgir! ^ d ii|i*»i; 4M ( » '4. *• M 1# illM t s i 3 Is 9 Oo ot c8{it§I i IMIz r? ? I M Mi «4 M S J 2 !p I D ryz: Ak- :'Sr' h: . 3l .: '• * >1 >. Jff ' m •-»- - T-»■■■ 11 I «Sii^>3' . r u «l«^«ii d . Jsa'«*»:3S#*d O D o«*viruc4tA<s^ ^•i.i<'^v>*«^l ■* All si«4»-4rl-i^ 0^^ A|»pr>)uAA^^ • \ T:*«^ t 1^:llm ' ■■ ,y^-r'<Ai. %r ■f^v J ■m I ^ 1*1; t ¥ • a k. J. I" t ft »». ih ft I ^ • mM Bones trad ItoteneAssodan^Pf, ni.•mHi iitH B. m m mm«. a •i H ft. ft ftfft«ft« ftt A • ft« ft«lMiP« «iHft it If A A_jji H July 12, Iffti City of Orong ftox 44 CryctBl lay, MS S532J >i*eio« At to: Jfinita lUbootft ?**'• C«J ’B* ftairtb ISIloro Drivo ftcar Jcooim: City ,l«i, ,er P«riMwa.. n.. other Pl*»7rS*ille*JerLSivUl2B, property et thie tim .o that thlKllVr. " ^ —•«a«t « the ^ •PpHc.tion for the .uMieieioa et a Utar Jat!^ The «wcc will Touri aery truly, •ons^. losiSE, UMltllt t ASS<-CUTfS. ISC. <p4/ A Glenn A, Cook GlCikj 9690£ 233S West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 •612-636-4600 vf ■f > l( ' Id k '* r':' - * a #' ' 'V i ■ McCnipoiltaii Control CnrainlNWksnWma iWt C mpc , 2X> Eaii F*^ Swrt. In IM. ha —tjo 55mJttM 23. Iftt #130 «I2^-941S J#«nn« Ha^ith Sonir»9 Adteiniatrator City of Orono r. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. HR 5S333 lUii Orooo iQtcrcsptor lomrcsveMnts MCC Project Ctoaber BS^iT Subject: Conditional Use Petalt/Varimee Applicati^ and Supporting Inforaatiofi ll^ar Ms. Mabostht Enclosed please find the coaipleted applicaticm. relevant plans, half section aap. staaped envelopes, photocopy of previously subaitted notification list, and surveys for the referenced project. This infor mation per*^alns specifically to lift station L44 near Maavell Bay Narine which was revised after the original permit application for this project was approved by the City of Orono. The MWCC and its consultant for the project. Bonestroo. Roeene. Anderlik. and Associates. puraueJ all other options pertaining to the relocation of this lift station. Finally, on April 27. 1988 a meeting was held with Mr. Jerry Toberaan. %rho is in the process of acquiring the property by contract for deed from Rita M. Straley (see attached 5/6/88 letter and 5/11/88 aemorandum). With future business develop ment in mind. Mr. Toberman asked that we locate the lift station in the farthest southwest corner, as represented on the revised plan sheets and surveys. It would be detriokental to the necessary project schedule if this proposed design is not accepted by the City of Orono. Therefore, the MWCC appreciates your thoughtful considerations of the issues at hand while reviewing this application. If you have any questions or require additional Inforaation, please contact the Project Manager. Kimberly Eckhardt, at our office at 229-2170. Assistant Director, Engineering CRP:KBE:sma KBE-L50 ^ ml/Enclosures Dli Vt^rfs I <) 7 ^ . 1 o o J % f .■* i\L 0 -^' m.:-m ■r',. I ‘ «« » ♦ 'WKay ft, 19lt Mtfro|K»liLiii Wii^tf Cofitr»4 (L«»ffiTiiivN|on%3»^* • «-|—|tl^ll-^^T^ 1» mi >• fW ««M::: **: ^#lou6Mr. J«rry T^lHtraun To6«r0>an Enterprises, Kaxvell Bay Karma ftOO South County Road 19 St. L<Mlis Baric, MN S542ft Itea Orooo Intercaptot l«pcovaa«nts ra^ Bro)«ct SuBibar BS-ft7 Subject: 4/27/88 Keating at Kaxvall bay Karina Dear Kr. Tobarmans As e result of our April 27, 1988 Saatib^ about t*i# aitfhf tf a pUEping station for the referenced Kh'CC project, our consulting enji- neers are proceeding with the design. However, I wanted ro c^firn the specifics with you to verify our previous verbal discutiion. The Mwcc will aove the designed location of a pniaping atation fror th# County Road SI right-of-way onto the far southwest corner of your 1st to the east of Maxwell Bay Marine in order to cause the least iirpict to your business investment. Presently, Jerry (ioodwin is paricing large boats in that area. In ord^r to accomplish this design change, our engineering consultants have to survey the corner and take one soil boring. As previously discussed, the MhCC will proceed vitn the property acquisition nf approxiiaately 3000 square feet as fee title purchase and 1200 square feet as a permanent access easement across the existing gravel goad. The project appraiser, Vince Wharton of HcReniie Metro Appraisals, should be in contact witn yc*i In about one month. The MWCC will coordinate the tenant reguiresients with the project negotiator, Stuart Storm of Von Klug and Associates, Inc. I tnans you for taking the time last week to discuss this issue with us and hope that your wife is doing better after her surgery. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. I have attached the project fact sheet and map for your information. Sincerely, Kimberly B. Eckhardt Project Manager K3E: sm.a KBE-L43 Attachments cc;JoEllen Hurr, MWCC Jeanne Matross, MWCC #**■ j'Jim Rosenberger, MWCC ^ | ^ vi I ^ K - j S s: J ‘ ^ •. I I r m % •■• y % ' I < #1306 PRETROPOLITAH <fAS7S COVTtOL COiVlSSIOS REROIAff^fflTO: TH« fil* DATEj 5/J2/i§ SUBJECT: Orono Int«rc«ptor t*pr6v***nt« mice RroJ*et eiuBb*r BS-S? Record of Phono Convoraotloik I ctliod Hr. Jorry Toboraan to aairo evro ho had ro* eoiood my S/S/tB lottor, which ho hadi. I *ii(o<! if ho> had any probloo* oith it ar.d ho aaid. •Re*. I also his sailing addrosa with hia rocoptionist afut oado tho nocoaaary chan^oa. Ni# cosploto eorroct addrosa is tho follcwingt Mr. Jorry Tetoroan Toboroan Managosont. MaMwoll Say Carina Suits 1460 600 South County Read Id St. Louis Par!*. H!l S5426 PiEi J * m »■ ^ a » ^ • * I 1 t*, ■ '*■1' V ! / i- r 9 \Xfv i: ^ . .-A*--, m N , \ P ' ^\U1 V :: •'■»■ ;■ u V^y--'..^ * ■•■'•*’■• *■ ^V , l«' V «------------—^ 1^1^ l'/^-' i 'j 1 -,|LJ j------------- 1 r V *' 1^ I* V r -% - #• • % W \m si*tF t t.r •f«b 7^ - c5 -- 'T * — %6 t F r c H.» • ' r* i i?**• m V c. % • i-- ' 1 ' ■ S'5% :•« >rr-.: mm L: * p \ t #» 'i- ■/*' ** •rfy^\r •#«»rf r ■> 9 % .^K fTl /ofl t I. r* . I ■■*a Skehh ancf Descriph'onf0T. Mk^rm Mft^ C^r^i Commtitton Orof*0 UiUrcipfot f^j€c/ ^ Pf-C7of» toumiof qtrm$t p9*4 wT litH^ Sk/*m f^t^rfy l^*tf$fcafton Nm. Oi- III- i$ 94-co03 ^4 fC NT fMt ^ 4n^ ho^ bt^n C0rnpv/fo^ i Irmm ctunJy mmp* mf*4f k^rtti dtscnfi^iont ho<n^ 6*tn p*^¥*dt& dy *ht C» ^ ^ Orof^ irka tf • SOtibo 'jo^. ~ - Uio* so/r '>1 «%• H if. m 1 IjM «Hlif faiiia iM^m, ■M • lim *w ilP«l4| llTJI Mg liitfM U9 IM M ^ r 1itlM f — n I MI^BTlI^ *• Wm. inm tat T8J •“ f« •• • t«M. MHoil to nt1 tto* «M tsmM«i tim m inriiiniBij Mb. mmtjt.i *• (>■» toM ft tot tocUto lM*j «tf tiwt mm QMtor M to «• mm. m mmmmmmrn mrnmrn l«*« avtoir ■ *• ••• Uto toto aetiM m. • totot 13S-J* • « uu* ■w <r tto Um «r aM 1/lm mch or tf* Atlatol fa t1 il llnv: a ato lin m mm toa« 9'««V AcUaft ITS ftto atolilVto tto artlaai wa Ir mm |aya«iila> to ato aa liia 4 <l4t«ni flf a/(? pb, n Scaki f*t 50' Book. — >H.ted5Ci ____ f^portcf 44. 4 -------- 4- o duty fh€ taof thi Sfa/I of ^ Pf-li9^lr^hnr\ hJo £ Q. QUO i SONS, INC.LAhio Susfvc yo0s ^ Ltxfodfon An. N. Ortfe P^ndj Mn. 550U '.'7g/ loc^c^tfn L-i^/rV. ■'»"•* m \ •:v y • .. i j CO =t{: Sketch Qnd Descrip/^ion/itrt lAdrm Watk. Ctfiirmi Com^nt^nInftrcifikf^jieJ Ak if C/ of t Smmtnf mr%a -mrmtpiir Qt^jt Ajafiurfjf Idtnii/$eoti Mm Thtt t'9 rmf 0 Mcakd efimtnttdot /r A(**vw Jrmm ho¥t bttn Co0np*t/^ Vt**7^ Cm0%t<if rrmpt 9»*d pAtA ■ kkrtm/ thsMfipN»*H k9v9 Jktn 0royn&tdiM fht (Sf^ t/" Orw%p, -• (j*/-" - /Jr«# •T Alnes/ • JM,Jm^/9 j!P krm MCf^fPhrnimmt^ • tm * 4n»# tT TS/np. CM‘ Ssmf • ^ thMu p^pMfM urn/. oftrWVit kmp. (cmm/- am/. m mmMmmmm% tm •mm^tmw^ mm pm— —, mm4mi , —t— t— tmlkt r— — li.V t—% mi %mm 9m— Iff •# tmm* pm— mi m—% i— 1. Ifi— wmMxm mi tmmi mil — %—tt— t, fmmmmrn^p iiv. Bm—m II* W» — mm—mi pmfmllml vttii in# ••«« Um mi Mi« %m—^mm • mmi mil xmx p—t mi Pmmmfmm^mt U« i. B—xtmm •• liv, Brnm— 11. AmriM •• tmlim—i Zmmt—im^ #t m p»«*« wiKt# • li*« irm— pmfXltl «M Sit mmmx mi tfe* m—t li*t mi —^i ••ett xmm m—x—tif mi Cmmmxf immi, m— mm —smmiUm mmi R«f;« flam tMt? xmmMmmm Mr%t pmtmllml viCM Mit limm SSt.f im— %m XHm mxt—m mi mmm—il'm 9my. L—m mi^mm—mmmmii tmmmmm mmmx—xmrlf mlrnttp mi— mi mm^i immm tm— xm m pmimx mmi— im fli.l im— m—t mi —ii $mmXt— 1im —tm% •!•« tiM mmmxhm—xmtif m——t mmm—fmi if —mi rmmmmimi im Pm— mmi mi Pmmim, pmpm iJti xmmm— mm—m—iy imm m—xmilf i*— mt Immi mm immi— Pm— m— mi Pmmim, pmprn tl^. m— im— xm xhm mi mm^i Cmm—f Pm—, mmii p»iM t«i»f f««ik Pmmx — XPm P—xi— H — t tmm—m mmmXPmmmimMif ftlMf mmii tm—tf Pm— tm XPm mmimt mi ct—■■■■■■■>i •«r«^ tPm m—t ^t.t f»«t m— fmtxPmf mmmmprni— x%— pmmt mt x— —xttm —m— immmtim— ptm—m— liiM m—xm — • u»« itm— mx rk—x xm XPm m—x li— — mmti ••ctiM •« • p«4»t 4M.I tm— Pm—P — X— rnm—imm m—m— — xmm m—x ii— — m14 t«i< ittiMW Pmimp tPm «««t U tm— mt XP— part — irn—tim— p9mp—Xf lri»t m—xp mt XPm tmii—tmm 4«««r&t«4 it P • ii—i Pmpi—im§ mx m p»iM •• tM m—x ii— mi x— mP—t 4»MVSI iitiMii 14J tmmx Mvtft tt— xsm ••rtiMMt m— tm——tt x—m— m— pmrpm—itMimt \m mmti «««t li— m iimxmm— mt %1 t—x m— tt«r« tmrmt—txmm. ■ ■■ ■■MjJ,' pm^ Tsp#tt«r Witt ft tftap^rftfjr cftfts*. ritctIm ftftftftaiftftt o*«r. «»4ftr ftiti mcmmm th«t p*r% of too oftftt SI foot mt x — I? f«ot of tto oto«o toftcfitot ptm—ttf lyiof Ootvooo tiio Uftl obowo ioftcrtOot Uao o«4 ft lift# pofftllol oltii oo4 i&fttoot M foot ftootft rroo*»«4t Ufti 4oftcr40o4 Ii»o« fftlt t ftry eoofttroot loo oo X to oftpifft r»fcr»ftfy H. !»»• 5caA Book -— Pb4€ ^ Job^ib. / hertby ctritlj fhoi thss p/an,survty or np by mt or untfO' my dtrtU suptrntton CHid Rtiislirtd Land Suryiyor u^r tht fowt OtAiilirtd MinmsoJa. Dohd •r. npori PP03 prtporfd t/ /bo/ / am a c/u/y of fbi S/a/t if RtjiilrcHon Ro £.Q. QUO ^ SONS, INC. Laho Su^e^es 5540 Lit ini fan Mvt. V Ordt Pintt, Mn. 55014 TV. TtC-5556 ■ft.|\ ( W. V I' \ ■•*} I J I 4 i' n .11 to*Planning Coealsalon Chairafen iCallay Orono Planning Coaaiissloci Hanbara City Adaiinlatrator BernhardaonFrasData:Michael P, Caffron# IMiat Planning i S<ming Jk^aiaiatrator July 13, 19SaSubject: 11307 Diana and Oouglaa Public Bearing Men 31f5 Ihitartcnra load Variance ~ Conatroct a deck within raguirad atraat yard aetJback Boning Diatrict - Rl-IB, 2 acre rural raaidantial Liat of Bzhibita Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P A(;plication Plat Map Property Owners Liat Survey Propoaed Deck Plana Staff Sketch of Deck Propoaal iShoving Relationahic to loads Partl]i«it Pacts 1. This is a corner lot and has frontage on both Matertown Road and Leaf Street. The RR-IB tone requires a 50* structural aatback fron a aide •treet. The existing house# which has been there for nany years# is located approximately 1* fron the %rest property line# and the propoaed deck stpcture will be approximately 11* from that lot line at the closest point. 2. Because the deck structure requires a railing# the deck does not meet the intent of the non-encroachment section# and must meet the required setback. 3. The applicant notes that this deck replaces an existing deck which they have recently removed due to its poor condition. There is very little evidence to suggest the size of the pre-existing deck# however# there are no nail holes or evidence that the deck ever was wrapped around the house to the north side. Perhaps the applicant can provide pictures to show what that existing deck looked like. 4. The proposed deck is laid out to keep only a 1* setback from the well* where a 3* wel 1-to-structure setback is required. If this deck in approved# it must be redesigned to meet that 3* setback requirement. 5. Construction on this deck was coismer.ced without a permit# and was rod- tagged by the building inspector. According to the Inspector# the applicants stated they didn't realiso a permit was required to replace an existing deck. j staffs opinion that this deck will have absolutely no effect cn neighboring properties# and will have no negative effects on the w •m tmm J 5 !k;#‘ 4 - m ri ir.' .'r ^ t > i I 9 / I a1 1 j A.. I % ^■A,jt|»-t 1 4 .■ '*! •f>1 >#f Zoningi file |1307 Page 2 of 2neighborhood. The eajorltv of the deck !■ K*K«n.t *k «. mthe home, elth only the JO- br 7- torVlin .» J ’'® *""* ®fw.tertoen Roed than the home! rh. hou.. acreened by .al.U.^’nhrn'^^'.^r;*!.^'^ VSf. '//""‘-‘•‘r «* to a'nd it 9tMtf Bar nail iiilai luti Fer«it,^*'lJlff^fe*JIj*thIt^thiI%rck\r*rn‘^^****®*f '^Ithoat a building property and eill have only coaitiva affaafiT. •^<>ition to the ^•refore# ataff recoMwmda^*?i,rjT.m.i aaighboring pr^ertiea.ore, arazc reooMenda approval subject to the fol loving co^itioBai 1. Reel., deck plan to leate a 3- aatback to the ealatln, well. bulldlnV'^de”reOTlatiooV'reoard*lno^nI t®«ply with all changes to the coaicleted no^irm »ka*. ^oatruction# including any building ina^c^;^. Portion that eay be deemed neee.aary b? thi ilttA. .< ' • ’*!a mI % "/:■ , h 'Jc:y ;i; I » -Jh • ✓ ■1 j •Tf-.. J Iff i v' ■r\«' •» ' \ -j.'? i i;- ) & %.i?#«f4 w I « f /- . y CITT or orao - ^KUaki afflicat :f^ /307Initial Application Fee $150.($50.00 per each additional Aeneval Variance Fee $75.00(no change froB original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)locATioa Site Addreaa ^SI B 0 7 i’H r y CA-^ OfnCE• %V*M dwviav e ve V '^\XSm.%' hi? ... ror.- 6i^T\ r (P.I.D. OOQ^ ibatract or ____ torrent?Fleate check one - Property retired Purvey *^*^^*^^”* ^ applicatioft if not includ«l on APPucAar Maine f>W.7 Phone (home } ___ Phone (work ) City; tipi Dn*V^ different than applicant) Phone (hoew) MaM <r Phone (work) Address s Cityj Date Property Acquired Xipi (month/year) parcels of land PRltSBIT USB or FMOPBRl'T tJ - Present Xoning District Rk -16 Present Use of Property k V % —_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _- - Residential a Other (specify) Describe request in detail: 1TAR1AHCBS UQOIKBD _____ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other _ __ Lot Width Front Hardcover i Side ■S r*t ' Rear)■*. .f- ■ <er « •' t - • a » # 11 f: j 1I ■i 'I I ♦ 9' >< « oomsiiF ^rd.hlp or practical di£ficultr,r«sttltl___________WtSCRIPTIOB or ng fro stricttio. rgs;ia.;Ks::i.r?r^ .~....ITIGHS 2. 3. UQOXUD SUMlTTltLS 1. Cooiplotad Application Fona Ovnara Idst of cnmara wli>t»in iro* /« 348*3271)/*'°" Bannepin County Dapart»ant of Fina^ca A-403 Sovt Cantir n«:ron thV*L>*/.‘U.?alih‘'no rlt"®’ to ..oh of th. obtainad with property owners* list) ** " (usa addraas labels* T^pUri^* Vur*v.77..UUna ^ in existing grade^are proposed. ^ ®P®**<* •l«vations) if any changes property owners list). Additional it«.. .. „y b. roque.tod by City Kiff. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. re»e«b«r that your *”varranca°applIcatlon^f'' •PPUcatlon. Pleaac. inforiMtlon ha. not bee“lnciudtdf eonpl.t. if th. abova. Cartification by fonln, Dapart»nt that v.rUnM'AppUMU;rir^I«;T Zoning Official'a Signatura_ _ _ _ _ APFLZCAirr*8 SIGHATORB Date The reques^ted by the**Z^^^ng^Ad»ini«t;rL*«-°'^^^* information required or unu\u.l axpaLes incurred fn rev\U Sf t^a‘2™T?c.\°. ***‘ *'the information auooii.a < .ri” «nd cattlfio. that:::z Applicant's Signature yU/l/f.Date Jd3JJ£P * /ONnOKS SIGHATDRB author "zVs ^Aasorable^^^ application and further agents, CoJrSJfon mem^rs^ and consultants, tion and verification^^hii request/ *" inve.tiga- Owner's Signature , f j jt Planning CoJ^^ission Miitfno ^25 days before th« oat. /./,^(UX<X> third Monday Of Vach":-\’"3S -nonaay or each month 2 ^ - -— 7 axo ucxa un tnc review meetings of the Plai?A{no^?^ present at all scheduled unable to attend a schedul2^ Council, if an applicant is authorised agent attend <n ™®®ting, please make arrangements to have ar Office of this chanae orio place and to advise the Building i ZoningV Fxrior to the meeting. J jrr- ♦ a-r I li i s - W% 'nmrr: -d 17 i. r ‘*5- A. *■« ■Vs m iMs I k^. X [■m ^ii f i J .V* :,A* -. X 4I .*v 1 "i , II 4 'f f. >, 0 • r* j I Pciepcirtiy Otnuir* List for 31f5 Hatcrtews ftoMf » A^liciitiQB fl307t Dififis •04- 117-23 22 OOOi jShirlsy BalliO Immt 8tra«t Long Lake, MM 5S3S4 05- 117-23 11 OOOS 1 C Grahaa Jr fS Leaf Street Long Lake, MM 5535L 04-117-23 22 OO&pCy Ma&cy Thayer ' 25 Cygnet Place Long Lake, MM SS3S8 04- 117-23 22 0000 Diane Xoepke 65 Cygnet Place Long Lake# MB 55356 05- 117-23 11 0001 Carl Mhase 3245 Matertoen fload Long Lake# MM 5535$ 32- 116-23 44 0001 Carol Senn 940 Brown Bead South Mayxata# MM 55391 33- 118-23 32 0001 Dr. Harold J Panueka 670 Southdale Med Bldg Edina# MM 55435 .f ■A'., '>1 ■f ■ %p: e* <» t ' H - k" T Jtiiir ^# ■Hr :ae’ «46| I % - ^ .. ♦ ■1 J ( c I Jj m f ; * r 1 » ^ / t A # ( c I . \ L N:. 1 «-*■««.. . . , , 1• ♦♦ ♦•♦ ♦--♦*♦ ♦*-♦... . ^# ♦ 4k A .t ^ ^♦ -♦♦• • « ♦ 4.^• • 4. ♦* • • • ♦ ♦ 4 . ♦i • • • ♦• . 4.*-*♦-♦* • ♦• . * 4’ t * ♦ ♦ • ♦-♦ •* ^ ♦ ♦ • 4-#-* ♦ t^.i .^ t ♦ ♦ , ... . , ,7 ^*••♦♦♦♦.* • A » « . 4 4^ ,- • ♦ • * 4 .♦ • • *♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ V ‘~f~t~* ----- ' - —f'* T . u±.--:—ittim:: ♦••♦>■ ♦ ♦ ♦- ♦-4 t JK ->•4- t-i- ♦-. 4:: • ♦ V ''It >■ t f 5^ 9C. C.-.O.., ~o .„ . C.O.. .„„o- . ,o .,...„ „ J I % [I iAf c1* 1 « 4 - A ■ • Af A # . - • * .. 4 -A » * 4 . . . ., 4. - . «■♦•■;14 . •• • » • i M ♦ ♦ " ♦ M4-a ♦ ♦f 4 i ♦ #- 4^ *4 4 ^ aA 4 4 4 « »i-.RRn'f b:.:: )J * * . A ^ ^« ^ A • *A I i _ . . «A i i _ . . A f f ^• •••• *A a M ^^ 1 * . - - , . ♦ • . * I J , 4 • » ^• A 4 ♦ •A 4 A 4 «• ♦ 4 A •• A • .4 4 4 • . • A4> A • » . » 4A « . • ■ 4 |pM ♦ 4 ♦ * . 4 ♦ ►• »4«A4*«A • • • A L • •4 A * ^ •^ A^ 4 4* -I:A- ^ 4 A -• •• -A ♦ 4 4 4 4**4 ♦TfA-4A ♦ ♦ A 4 » 4 * f 4 ♦ A * 4- ^♦ * A f-f-* . ■■*••<% A A-A f UAruttr.A .. A . 4 A 4 -A ^ t;: .L - :i: . I A A 4 ► -■*■ 4- -•'.- A-i 4 4 A 4 »f •4^"4- 4-*-4> A* ♦ --f A - ♦ !• - *A . M ♦ 4 ♦ ♦ -^ -4.^ 4A. w TT — —___________________ 3-, 4lr_io: ‘irz^z 4 4 * '-4- * 4 ♦ ■'i ♦--4--4- ■4 4-4-'f ♦ 4 . 4-a-a-a— • 4---4- 4 4~^ . A- 4. ’ •■ *t^‘ n • 4-4-4-'A--4' -'4 ■ . • f-f-t ^ —^ 4T1 -♦ 4 -f A --A- " 4 ■ 4"4—A H t~»—*—► H t-r- ^--—r---^ — 4~~ * ~ 4 ~ 4-— •■ -4—A ' A i , . 4.— 4.4-4 4~4 A A 4' -A- 4- • -4 A - - ♦- --. - 4 A ♦- ♦■—♦•- * ,... -^—4 > -hA-£)L^-4 -4-4-4^ ^ CT , ,i .._4-4 .4 444:4 - • - * ^ t-t -^i:j.^::::: p\ : ’ ^ ^ "4'" Pb* ^ ' 4—4— ►-■•• -4— A- A 4^jr .t-^.4- A-'-4 -A- 4- 4 ^ ' " ■* '••" * 4 A 2^ A 4 4 - A A . ■»■ 4-4-< ►-4 -4-4 ' A^ "•t-4'f^ f-4-. - -^.4.4.4—♦ 4 . 4- 4 t A ..-j-A- A-* A -^ - 4-4 -4- * 4 •4“-4- 4-a- 4 4—4. —4. - 4 - • i. 4.. ^-4 i 4 - i 4- .4 . A-_ -1- i - -A ♦ 4 4 f 4 4?mt« ■- -+—f-4HK-4- t ■♦■ t- -t 11 > ^ • ■ "tl r t"! ; r I -I f "I" t'A'f A ' ..-4 —• -- h_ „- 4. .4 ,-_4._._.^_4.- . .. ^ .-4 4.-4- , 4, ♦ --..4.- •- 4-4 4-A * - 1-4. ;-4 4.4- ♦ :i:r{T!';;- : r t”'4 1-4-4 • 4--f ' * i.—♦ .L... <- ♦■ '•■ff-T “t~tl t't ■t-t-r-T-r*r- _(—^,- '^H 't rr M *-Hf' Ki rt- ’ I • 4—4 -4 4 '-f-A . ^-t f- |'•^■-A■ -.^• t A-4 4 4----A- -A - -4 ■ f -i -■*■ --rl-f'; *-t • -ti 4-i- ,4..4 ■•* It±*_u:-t-. 4 4 4 -4 » A- . -A 14 -a..-4-a ri i ♦ —A - t 4 • •♦'•■^•44'• .• - *...4.. ■T ri-, A-i- t-t - ■'t-iX !t ^ !I 1 ■X.4..,-A- . 4-A-4..J t ff 44 '- f t t-rt -4—A-■ A- •♦ - t-t ♦--•A- -4 -A 4~ ♦» ■4*”* —♦ ■ 4- *. ««4 ■ *— • ■* * • 4——^ *■-*—4- 4-"i iWllhl - A-.| ••* «-. «......■ 4 -i A A - * * - 4.- -i A. .4.- . ,_ 4-a .*■44 A 4 rSn t;j I -l-•♦-.X. t-H f A—t't- ■ ♦ • - * f'-'* i '*’"' i 11 n ! t I n r t ! ' rfr CITAOCLi^ NO «42 - CItOSS SCCTlON - lO SQUAAr.S TO INCH -' Z.\-- J r ( c \ ]XfSl? # « i - • •» ' • 5^ M 1 *' * ^-.i -- *•■--* ., j/y* f ^ ♦ -. .i -., .. ..4.44 ■ 'i \ *’ W', *■ - ‘ i ♦ -^-, *‘^f "* «► j." /:r:,trrtd: $rr:-:::: K : i ■ ;/: :- I . til-;., ^ i X. * I ^ ■/ : : H rr^tr r ■r ? * ♦ -•* - ? ^ »• ^ « • . • t / • • . ♦ . r-»/ i / • f - I- rt—4.... —,. ^...^ i4 .1 4. IT['.n r j-hl • •--►- t'f t rr : r -♦- ♦ . . , » - • ■ t - - 4 -4 * ♦.. -^ . i ■t-t-t-r-fi • ‘-I I -, -4-j ^ i,j4 — ► ♦ -t ? • "f f ■♦ ♦ - f. . .... ...i rri-FS'^T-i :-i;Cvf4|. \ r •t-* f-i ♦ i- - X ^ ^ ' / f -Mrr ♦ f - i *► - ♦-‘ ri-iV4- f ♦■ ft’rt-t * ¥ f ♦ -i . I - I. .4 -| f-l- r -^4- r t- -• - i . . ♦. ? ft ' I i^'t i .I r : I : r! r ; I ♦ , , , 4 , . • I i ! -l4*-♦-4- CnAOtLfl NO t42 . CROSS StCTION - to SOUARtS TO INCH n:rif+r+ 4!-!4il;4 6- j %Wr I-* r I .V r c. V r s < 1 J fi ' '» I r linu!:! ;^ ♦ * * ♦ 4 « . f «KU'tHir:* • ♦ • i 4 i i, . ,Irn.:;.1 4 * t. . ,• *•♦.*. * 4 -.4 4 ♦ 4 4 4 .■• • 4 i • . . • .'f/aiet477- ; * •■-4-4 •4 *1» « .4. «» I 1»■^ ■■'A i k..2 ^ \ * t-- * ► -‘■•**4».4.rn-*--'J J * * •■■-4 i J■ •* t ^ »• ^< i>4 J * ’ •• * ♦ ■ --. , ► -♦..4-^.4 . . . '* * '^TT"^ * ■■ ?1l' ■♦•♦■■* • ;:-:.r*r:t4 ,"tt.‘;: - — - 4 --*.. 4 . ,. ^ k * *. — t -♦ ♦- •• t. 4 ■ ■ ■ --U . . .. . •• •* .. .aJKS 1 •^-. .... .... _. . ,..l .Z^.. '■ ’ • * * ‘ - * ■• ' ■ • +»* • ;«... 4 ..4 « •« f i f > 4 + 4 A. .; ! ! ! 1 rii*-":- , ; ,-r....pl.-. t- t- i i 4 -, * . f-i- ♦4 i..4. . . f ■♦ ^ ♦ -♦ . 4 4 ; 4 i-4 4 . . » 4... . i i :-4-4 ; • ■: M-f44 .-. ; --4. ^ 4— 4.-4 i I t ■ t r f o 'V MHhIk.' ----- ST i J II ji'" J i mi' 'fm f I >■ T 11I f^. . £,/wre^^f.F^'TM^ StnTCJtJ>t^/AJCa >^c4C ►I ♦ '#< a'- aV / / . a (a-^V^'^p \ ««•■«»*• //I •t! ,ni t- "'?»<l ii^-^ ■ 1 >•'?! I- h - :-l s. !<.l ..U?'-. ■•■■• I -'i \ "a: ! J if- g- A* \ I .1 A ♦ ‘ y fx A T I .‘■TR >1 m t y •A Tot Planning CoaaiiBsiQn Chainuin Kallay* Orono Planning Coonlaaloo Haa^rs City Adainistrator larnhardaonWtiDatCfMchael p. Gaffron, Aaat Planning i Xoning KdainlatratQx July ISt 19SS inbjacts 11308 Robert evens, 1700 lohni Point Ro*d - Variance - Public Hearing Application - Replace existing deck vlth siailar deck of approxlnately square footage, variance required is for hardcover in 75-250* xone. loniag District - LX-lB, Single Paaily, 1-aere Mst of Bsdiibite Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit B Exhibit I Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey with Staff Botationa Letter of Request froa Applicant Neighboring Property Owners Notification Hardcover Calculations Proposed Deck Plan Applicant's Deck Plan with Sotes Showing Relation to Originally Existing Deck Pertinent Pacts 1. Hardcover in the 75-250* sons is currently at 361. This is not a change from what was pre-existing. In the 0-75* sone, which Includes a patio and a stairway, hardcover is at about 3.21. The applicant sustained severe damage to his property during the 1987 "super storm", and is in the final stages of completing restoration. 2. As part of the restoration, applicant had to reatove the stairway from the existing deck in order for equipment to move past the south side of the house. As his letter indicates, removal of the stairway revealed that the deck had been infested by carpenter ants and was structurally becoming unsafe. To that end, the existing deck was removed and it was replaced with a similar deck in essentially the same location and of the sasie square footage, but skewed slightly to give it some character and to blend in with the contours. It was at this stage, where the deck is complete but the stairways and railings have not been constructed, that staff became aware of this deck replacement and advised the applicant that such replacement technically requires a variance because the property exceeds the 25% hardcover limit in the 75-250' rone. 3. Exhibit I submitted by the applicant indicates the location of the previously existing deck and the new deck, and shows the location of the stairways associated with those decks. Note that the new deck extends 4’ closer to the lake, but is still more than 90' from the shoreline. The new deck Itself is 10' from the side property line, with the stairway ' V r % ( J I Itid<«iai«] in< 4. 1< tl bi r< ur hs f. f ' V Di It rs si wh wl an ph 8t Fi re ha > « V ^ V I ♦ I ’»'* %i. approximately 7* from tlie line at ita closest point. Vote that thm topography ^ets higher as yoo move toeard the Anderson house. This new deck mill not encroach on an average lakeshore setback, and does not “I setback since the stairs are a non-encroachment and the railings that are located less than 10* from the prosertv line extend no higher than a 3-1/2' fence voeld. The applicant notes that the new deck is 4 tquar# tmmt Immu hardcoveir than tha |;ra-axiatifi9 dacJt, 4. Staff has revieved the hardcover on the site and finds that th# lim^cape areas underlain by plastic generally are near the %*est side of the house where that plastic helps to prevent drainage directly into the bassMnt wall area. It would se» appropriate to allow this hardcover to *■*“**'• would also note that much of the shrubbed area that has rock underneath is underlain by porous fabric which staff does not consider as hxxrdcov^x e Dlscussloii It appears that the contractor doing the storm damage repair did not nsed for a permit to replace the existing deck with a deck •‘■ll**” i® site. Mr. Owens presumed that the contractor had taken out were necessary. The applicant has been very cooperative with the City in providing the necessary infoimation for this application and has been working with staff and the city engineer during the various phases of restoration. Staff BarnaMandatioB Finding that hardcover is not incraaaed by this rebuilt deck, staff would recommend spprovsl of s hardcover vsrisnce to allow continuation cf the 34% hardcover in the 75-250* sone. I J iio tcm or ammo - WKUJmcm atpliciiticiiInitial Application W— $130.00 ($50.00 par aach additional va Ranawal Varianca Fee $75.00 *O .o(no chanoa froa orioin«i annii >) monm hoaaiam Site Addresa, noQ l2>oi4<M5 Pot«^-r icws r* Froparty Identification Hiabar (P.I.D.I /^ -f ll~ J23 2.^ ^000*^ Plaasa check one - Property 7^ abstract or torrans?a • i. V Wnctlon if ”1 «-a A not ineludad on »► « applicant Name 44.0( Address?/loo X OWNNR (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ Pbone (ho»a) 4-1 ( ^"\<\LL. ’ _ _ Phone (work) -3ft(a5^ Phone (hoeia) Phone (work) City?Address? Date Property Acquired >40V .19^9 (month/yaar) - - --!_ Adjacent parcels of land. ^ISIEHT OSB OP PAOPBimr ” * * -- ---- -- - - - - - - --PROPBRTT Presenc Zoning District Present Use of Property 5i>A<bL^ <-g--li^ Residential Other (specify) description of rboobst Estimated Construction Cost $ A. variancbs required “*■ ” - --—- --— Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances ( Front h&’k. m. N>^ Hardcover Side Rear) CS6:€ic, (5>siC/p-^.A » I >s •.-C^oc.ve6..5.^e ■^y I Mfr 1•V- ’ ^ 4i' * Js i J ■ 1 2 4 5 $ 7 T r 1 C z A T r u t k O T a a t A P t r u a O i Mil * f » -ni ■#. % ■>' ■':# &1^, ^ ^ % ^ 1 V ^'■ ,1. > * HJtfO^IP .p or practical difficulty raaultina ,froa strict r«9oiatioas i iMwg-lgOKCBimOH or OBOSOKL PIIO»tff COHDITIOMSDescribe unusual property conditions preventing Code Bequlrceentet tSvjtf vith toning 2. ■■aOIitBD SOBHITTAL5 1. Coapleted Application Fom Certified Property Owners List of enmers within ISO* (yeo Kost obtain this list froa itennepin County Departaent of Finance A-C03 Cost Center 34S-3271). Steeped, leqal sised envelopes (tlO) pra-addressed to each of the manes on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as reiiulxiRl* Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any ohanfei in existing grade are pr<^>osed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendua to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional Iteea as aay be requested by City staff. 4. 5. €. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner aust sign this application, remeaber that your variance application is not conplete If the ebove infomation has not been included. Certification by Zoning Departnent that Variance Application is ooaplete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D^te APPLICAMT'8 SlGaATOU The applicant hereby agrees to provide all inforaation required or requested by the Zoning Adainistrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the Inforaation supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature o«te ^ 12^ 166 OWHBRS SIGHATORB The owner hereby ac)cowledgeB and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants# agents, Cosnission nesibers, and Council aiexnbers for purposes of investiga** tion and verification of this request. , , Js-LMifOwner's Signature Date m. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Ccxnoiission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)te arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J « : ■ ' # : iK * • ■i .%■ i r:'r: ‘ "w-p :-t‘ % It.. * I • . . ' ■ ■ ■ ■ ' *w <iA m ii ‘ ro OJ cr %. __ -+- j I# 4t ♦ » ♦ it • . \ rrfifttrtf rm t4mt tm 1700 Wotm mrni • ^Ucotios illM. Idbertl«-117-23 22 0001 ThoMS t Cottni* ffwtn liOO Oohns Oolnt Itosd Kaysata, KM 55391 10-117-23 22 0002 David i OlaAa Dimlap 1040 Bc^a Point toad Waytata, KM 55391 10-117-23 22 0004 DOS Andara<M 1720 Oc^na Point ik>ad Waysata. IQI 55391 10-117-23 22 0005 Tarry 0 Julia Faldaiann 1725 Bohna Point lc»d Kaysata, Ml 55391 17-117-23 11 0001 T Danny Sanford 430 Oak Gtovm 8t Suita 200 Mlpa., MM 55403 17-117-23 11 0002 J M Dayton o E J Dayton 1055 Bohna Point Bead Maysata, MM 55391 k V ^ J: 'f " •«f Jrl ^ A ^Rr j; .w .i i^*\. . #r (, i #?? #■ % ^ 'Tk ^on^«.i^ Mm r«i»tV92«U. mmmrnu »»lJC!SI 30. 1988 Zonlnf Ite|»«nHMt City of Oimo I33S iron!} t«o SovtH CrytUi liy, NIafittOU SSJ23 Rt: ^mmsLmituum GontloMo; H-1 Q o # to i*^fi'*i?*'' "t'* p™tltft «M<tla*at tafarMUoa conctnlM % ><r|inc* AppHc.tloa ttU4 Jm 2*. ifM. ..la rm tun nt.tn4. *****;.;’!* «t.«.ln >Ur. (Mist nppir pnjpct canrM *^1!!?^ **'“• •“•« »• «• •to'TdtiJS la«SfT «< tn«e»«, til* cilttlnp dpck KM to K» por. !!Hi. ”** "’‘***« ■•* '»♦'» 0> S*®*'* COKttrocttS SiuittIS port of a aitlor oi|}ms1o«i few Piol fierot la 1M6.) wmony ^ ^ **• *® la^Mtod tn carpontcr riSrirVrr ;srr:-ijr- tr»oy folIH to toko oat a toporiU pomlt for tMs oork. «riwis*7, Tho ^tfr^ floatation of tho Nmso Is faclaf 'U» lake. The llolna level ii at m* lake side. Access to the outdoors and the lake 1«through sliding glass doors opening on the deck. MdHf «**'“^** We respectfully request approval of this Variance Applfcation. Sincerely, J «sM T -y', i i 4 ■rnmm: : ■ ^ #1 soJlrdjA^Htt groyrtT OrMii’*t |ir«)Ipriat DaM(»)l of n «nas{print Address]bays r«yi««d4 the plans for the proposed ia«»rQY«aeiit or proposo4 i»sa of tte propdrtf located at 1^00 alte referred to as taniS Ose 1 Cee) aadersiaad that la execotis9 this ackaonledfeaestt t Cee) aa (are) aot asked to declare approYsl or dlsapproeal of the property or ese ibut aerely to coafir* for the City CoqbcII that I (we) aa (arel avert of the iaproyeMBt plaBS aBd that the proposed Beithbor's project or ost requires Council epprorel. property Omer bete yroperty Ovner IDate If you hava any Inforaatlon that may assist the City in the revieii of this Lend Ose Applicstion, please subsiit your eoaaents to the Building I toning Office et least 10 dsys prior to the scheduled aeeting date. 'I J y‘aX ''4 ■?:V.■ 'i;' r%. m V4r' '4* ■be- J 1 ’ (■ t- \ > '*r-: f 1^’-^ V' i- v ’/' « •I %. >• I----------1 ---------TTn mil Ia.#1303.,S««x« ustm (1/1)K100 IB/&}alOQ 75-250* 29MOO* soo-iw -34-7 ,t -aA30<^t 'J'2£tL, _3^.f __3 ^ « Ql^» 3fc Kl/^ ml %.•f •f .1 i .1 i BMDOovn irMiTurion •tTMtartti %rlth t<wfai 0mm it %Uttm4 tl4a«alk« Driwwiys (paw4 mt fravali 0*e«r«tiv« laMscapiBf arsmii sa4«flBla by pUbtle aHaatifi^ top# cf ntaialAf rack mllB A*y athar sarfaca that tfoaa Bat allaa dlraelt ibaarptiaa af ralJtfBll iata tte PTHW t*KgS»0»B IdWOLkTlOBB «tC. 10.22, tSCOLATXMO POa *UI-1A». -IJI-lB-l-. •LB-ift* m«« •«. .. rwiiLT LAxssBon ■ssxonrrxa& Dxmxer. wthiB Ly LR-lC-l- on. rally Lak.ahor. ■a.ldantl.l Diatrlct th. follUf '™ “• •"""•• •■ "“■S”...." *^l«tiona. tnthln 75 faat of ahoraliaa thara «.Vin A To "o'V.U »ithi" 250 tfioJ•*““ *» ™»”«“ »• »«a ~,.r; cov.t. wuhin 500 to l.OOO (Mt o/tU”rh^Ml” ’VhM.VlJll’b****'hard cover. *00x01100 thora aha 11 be bo greater than 351 Subd. 3. Tree Ren'«val Regulations. with the diameter of alx (6) inches or aore a permit froBi th# Council. Ro trees within 75 feet of the ahoreline shall be reaovad without firit obtaining re :t," 1 m ■ } J % t: .7 V ., •: > ' ' ib.jUMPcyrro owpTwuwm - fa irrs, tw otom citr o»a£ii — ___ .... f»»Coy«_iifB»CK ioCT» ~ maamsM ALuma *" l«t*ikor«i, »• iardcpaa^ f aiioBaJ XI. 7»-2SO*t la tb« pertlos of tHa let lo«ata4 that portion of t&e let 007 te t . • 9r/r 111. 2S<KS<Xk*i fa tfce portlofi of tko lot leoate4 bet free tba lake jgf ef that partial of the let tmf ha • iv. SMM.l»000*t la the pert lea ef the let lomted bet frea the lake 151 ef that pert toe of the let aaf ■07*« Theae rapaiatieot apply evea If yea within a laJtaah^e aealao dietrict. beteeea 7|» aad ISO* free the weea 310* uid sqo> feat iW aai I.poo* fteti hate a lot that deaa aet ehat tha laka bati 1® HOW TO pTmayi^ lye aaaa g^cg grrtkCi tsm {tq oaed mm deaotaiiefM in ailhardcovar paroaatefe eelealatlJSJ? ^ » « ua«a aa oanoariiater in all 1. 0»7S« I Area • 75» a 75* a /kvarafi width of let in 0-75* tota \ aeasore parallel to ahoralioa ^/s^_ft. e n. £)$t) a.f. li (keg width) Area of 0>7S> tooa ') 75»aS0* lena Area - 1175*or awg lot depth la ton#)> a/kwf width of lot in 75-250' sonaX 14 o \ eaaaura parallel to ahorallno J ft.. a^,3c>o ,j, (Arg width) Area of 75-250* roae Iff. 250-500' lone »TM - (250- or .v« lot a.pih In ,oc«) l^Xr, vioth of lot in J5O-500' son,\ X eaaaura parallel to ahoraline / 250* a N. A (Avg width) ft. •e.f. (3) Area of 250-500* tofia IV. 500-1.000' tone Area - (500' or avg lot depth In lona) x/Awg width of let in 500-1000' tone V, eaaaura parallel to ahorellna 500- , _„N. A ft. . ____________ (Avg wiath) Area of 500-1,000* sona ) ¥ > s * »• J .V O f » rf I"' ^ - r* t * r>PIXPH^1Ml iAs IH4s$ 5\ ^ l» M» IX • i X«l 'Pr I *7 i i i • • * •% •% <aa^ » • M* 3 oo m m II-*oo 2^ • • m • • V V S. ? «»»•» (•»•* ?Ls* Cbo 2 # IM* ? 7 ♦ ir iMh 2 I ^ E 61 «i| fo I I w ►fo 7 W s IP I 0 ia m4AIT 9m >* II Ml 5^ M m V m 9m Ws ? I fib <♦ar o I t m S 8 » 4 >r* > •%•%»% i H 1*^ i ntnsw 3 IX* I M 5 t6 I 1 1}r o ! i i fP 0 m 8 I m t flb ftar 7 IP 9 7 S IPar 3 M >r* 4 * . I« M IP 2 #r A a « 9 8 J = 4: 1% ■>r'i .; ■**». t * % % / tj♦a o «i I I \ X r ’ <4 I- L*is. t ft I oi85Ms8 mI m r• •ffip#» M H2 '• • •a •'<1 O ?i S% (►4 « 0^ w i I !j •«i«•%'• Hi* n oo h-*oo •%•% s •% (M m m m « •% •% • • • m• •m ^ V \ 4 •% f v«M 1 ip B m •f fibo 3 » ♦ C I 0 T t r* (M» i I VJ sr 9 » -J >r» ►% • • • • •% •% • ••% 9m ►4 17 •w >• o •* M B •1 ! ' i !' 1r 1 41 *■ *! 1 M M t _ 1 :J? ••o «S " »4 “ t m m M H M m tl « J? " i - 9 1 1 ^H:M m n i 1 Q* rt y m•m I • p? ra* K ■ *m m 9% m *% i ®. i «%<••% IM t sr ar €b I t I 1^ O 9 n 3 >f t* m !•% « i<#8T 8 I$««Immmi Cb<#V ?a W' m 8 \ ?^ M» ? M»s ►4 Oo W » § M s cni la J *' • ■1rv.- ■ t I I 5 i :h ik-'i 'i?^HE V r-r -2»i-^- * >»r-'<Te!>^ ^ * ^a.c.2 K^Ai ■*• "“ m __ (^ 4# "r-v<.*Ntl» --'C» 7 '.5?'^ -trPA^ FS iili ■;*. Si, 'K' \ ■i « JP ♦» V . ) H r 5f-MbQu m 3TI# * Jtii f4'?i1^'1!i/# • • j k ‘ - :■'>v.r f 4 . / Tot Dates Planning Comnission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Conuniasion Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning d Zoning Administrator July 15, 1988 Subjects #1308 Robert Owens, 1700 Bohns Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing Application ~ Replace existing deck with similar deck of approximately same square footage. Variance required is for hardcover in 75-250* zone. Soning District - LR-IB, Single Family, 1-acre List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - f^rtinent Facts Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey with Staff Notations Letter of Request from Applicant Neighboring Property Owners Notification Hardcover Calculations Proposed Deck Plan Applicant's Deck Plan with Notes Showing Relation to Originally Existing Deck 1. Hardcover in the 75-250* zone is currently at 36%. This is not a change from what was pre-existing. In the 0-75* zone, which includes a patio and a stairway, hardcover is at about 3.2%. The applicant sustained severe damage to his property during the 1987 "super storm", and is in the final stages of completing restoration. 2. As part of the restoration, applicant had to remove the stairway from the existing deck in order for equipment to move past the south side of the house. As his letter indicates, removal of the stairway revealed that the deck had been infested by carpenter ants and was structurally becoming unsafe. To that end, the existing deck was removed and it was replaced with a similar deck in essentially the same location and of the same square footage, but skewed slightly to give it some character and to blend in with the contours. It was at this stage, where the deck is complete but the stairways and railings have not been constructed, that staff became aware of this deck replacement and advised the applicant that such replacement technically requires a variance because the property exceeds the 25% hardcover limit in the 75-250* zone. 3. Exhibit I submitted by the applicant indicates the location of the previously existing deck and the new deck, and shows the location of the stairways associated with those decks. Note that the new deck extends 4* closer to the lake, but is s^'ill more than 90* from the shoreline. The new deck itself is 10* from the side property line, with the stairway - « m J f1 k.^ ^ ^ V f -M;^! r,.^..i: F ^N- ■ *i: >T ^ r ‘*y v/' . f approxinately 7* fron the line at its closest point. Note that the topography gets higher as you move toward the Anderson house. This new deck will not encroach on an average lakeshore setback, and does not encroach on any side yard setback since the stairs are a non-encroachaient and the railings that are located less than 10* from the property line extend no higher than a 3*>l/2' fence would. The applicant notes that the new deck is 4 square feet less hardcover than the pre-existing deck. 4. Staff has reviewed the hardcover on the site and finds that the landscape areas underlain by plastic generally are near the west side of the house where that plastic helps to prevent drainage directly into the basement wall area. It would seem appropriate to allow this hardcover to restain. Staff would also note that much of the shrubbed area that has rock underneath is underlain by porous fabric which staff does not consider as hardcover. Diacossicm It appears that the contractor doing the storm damage repair did not realize the need for a permit to replace the existing deck with a deck similar in size. Mr. Owens presumed that the contractor had taken out whatever permits were necessary. The applicant has been very cooperative with the City in providing the necessary information for this application and has been working with staff and the city engineer during the various phases of restoration. Staff Recosssefidation Finding that hardcover is not increased by this rebuilt deck, staff would recommend approval of a hardcover variance to allow continuation of the 36% hardcover in the 75-250* zone. J *» * V ■■ J . '-r' :-^m H rW’ »- y' ^/S€fS v::-- i') • •n -■ • w.. I ' w. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIONInitial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional v Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original appli§aftion)"^'“ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address IHOO iPotMT" Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) /4> m j23 2»"2. Please check one - Property abstract or _ _ torrens? • V: • • * • fc * ■ •• * • ^ «.. • / * •L rr*-^ r.- v.*V I* * - U' W 01 "wA ' w . .* v^ • vv» •r.“ -‘V Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. YCU APPLICANT Phone (home) L Name Phone (work) Address:/1CQ City; Zip; / •k/%J OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^_ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired C>\/ . 1 ^ ^________ I (do) ^d^no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) PRESENT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ _ Present Use of Property ^i>4<bL<£r <-£--16 Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP R]Estimated Construction Cost $ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) fer Setback Variances (_ _ _ _ _ _ Other P>eiP0^6. hcSg.K (JI^iTH-nV^ jS&^ Wi/efciS-roeM £>«^ . I mm f 9 •ti' rr ( i j i I. f>mi. 1^ •V ,a 3 V t M 4 1 nip PROPBRIT COMDITICmS preventing comp liar Rl 1. • ; * *■ 2. ^ •.3. « ’'>C,4. 5. '■A 6. 7. ( ■ h . •8. lIRBD SUBMITTALS Conpleted Application Form twiitS? *r^Be^*'ne^i"„* County*D^L (you must obtain348-3271). county Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center Stamped, legal siied envelopes (#10) ^ names on the above list with no ^ obtained with property owners li^t)^ address (use address labels in exlatlng grade"^.te prowled i* any change. - '*ith property oiimers list).As an addendum to this anni -.T remembe^^thrt your**^a?ilSL°applicatL application. Please information has not been included. ^ complete if the above Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Zoning Official's Signature Application is complete. Date APPUCAIIT'S sighatdrb requested by the Zoning" Administra't'o’r‘“'‘.™'^lt.'‘1'^°''"'®*^°'’ 'required .. unusual expenses incurred in review of th'l. 1™?® f, '’®^ ®^^ *««® and/or the information supplied is tiru#a ~^ PPlication^ and certifies that knowledge. PPXiea is true and correct to the best of his/her Applicant's Signature Date 2 OWNERS SIGNATURE authorize^s ^r^easonable°entry^onto^th^ application and further agents. Commission and Council ®‘®“' «"aultant"tion and verification of this reqSest^^ members for purposes of investiga- owner's Signature _C A- 4 /x4-/ftP PlanninrcoJJ^ission Meitingr^*'p?anni^q°Coii^ ‘^^*^ offices 25 days before the sj-u?, -.r.* 'F“ Office of this change Prior^to th^^ ^ee^"^ advise the Building & Zoning r3!f. J r r r ' VS f > 1 1 i ' ■K"P'1 ■ 0-J r% A . • I • r ♦ .; ''1 I ■ . ^ iProperty Owens Owms List for 1700 Bohns Point Road - Application ilSOIr Robert 16-117-23 22 0001 Thomas 6 Connie Sween 1600 Bohns Point Road Wayzatar MM 55391 16-117-23 22 0002 David 6 Diane Dunlap 1640 Bohns Point Road Hayzataf MM 55391 16-117-23 22 0004 D 6 S Anderson 1720 Bohns Point Road Wayzata» MM 55391 16- 117-23 22 0005 Terry k Julie Feldmann 1725 Bohns Point Road WayzatSr Mil 55391 17- 117-23 11 0001 T Denny Sanford 430 Oak Grove St Suite 200 Mips., MM 55403 17-117-23 11 0002 J M Dayton & E J Dayton 1655 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MM 55391 § * At %■ r'A'r ROBERT N. OVENS 1700 Bolms Point Road VdyzaU, NIimosoU 55391 June 30, 1988 Zoning Oepartaent City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE: VARIANCE APPLICATION Gentlemen: M1 p. p g » sr ' This letter trill provide additional information concerning ny Variance Application dated June 24, 1988, which you have received. The chain of events began with the extensive storm damage repair project covered by Orono Permit Number 000766. To obtain access to the storm damaged lakeshore for heavy earthmovina equipment and trucks, the existing deck had to be par tially dismantled. (The existing deck was built by Rebers Construction Company as part of a major expansion for Paul Gerot In 1966.) In partially dismantling the deck it was found to be so Infested by carpenter ants (large black ants) as to be at risk of collapsing. We had no choice but to tear It down and rebuild It. The contractor doing all of the storm damage repair. Outdoor Environments, Inc, proceeded to tear down and then rebuild the deck. They drew plans for a deck shaped somewhat differently but not Involving more hard cover or encroaching further on the adjacent property line. (See the enclosed drawing.) Obviously, they failed to take out a separate permit for this work. The entire orientation of the house Is facing the lake. The living level Is at the second level on the lake side. Access to the outdoors and the lake Is through sliding glass doors opening on the deck. The new deck could be removed and rebuilt exactly as before, but this would be quite costly and not reduce the hard cover. We respectfully request approval of this Variance Application. Sincerely, •Iliwlliiii J 4 e * «• 'J r *■ * jf •k r ( t: •V A.I u * f ♦\ k » i. . ' f f ri) Adjaottt Property Corners' Adcaoirledgawnt Pore &^4■»J IS I-J ot n 2o t^«HsXg feiKJcr^fl, TprlntadoreIprint name(s)]T have reviewed the plane for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at HOO also referred to aa land Dee Application Ho. 13^1^, I (we) understand that in executing this acJcnowledgement, I (we) am (are) not as)ced to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date Information that may assist the City in the review of m K*- ■tt* I r'i'* w,.r-r.'mm.. J V y „ r .1, :f \ >' '• /'^ }i\ 4 . % , 0 6. «aw>covgii caiLCDLATioii mimmA.#1 i)f'\U <G>.*-:3 Lak«sbor« Setback Son# 0-75 • 75-250* 250-500* 500-1000* Lot Area In Zona Existing Oardcovar In S<ma Bxlatlng Bardeovar (B/A)xl00 Pinal Propoaad Bardeovar In Zona Bardeovar Pereanta9a (D/A)xl00 Allo««ad Bardeovar Parcantaga l\.i>CCkt -34^ -2P.30t^t ■3l « ^7 -2. *3^ » 02-fc€)»t 3^ M A .t MA.f af af 1 af af % % 1 1 .1 HAKDCOVER LIMITATIONS BABOCOVBS INCLODBSt - Strneturaa with roofs - Dacka« avan if alattad - Sldawalka - Orivaaaya (pavad or graval> - Dacorativa landacapino araaa undarlain by plastic shaating - Tops of rataining walls, rock walls - Any othar surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground B. OTHBR LAKBSHORB RBCOLATIONS SBC. 10.22, BB60LATZOBS POR •LB-IA", •LB-lA-1*, •LB-IB", *LB-1C- AND -LB-lC-1* OBB PANILT LABB8B0RB KBBIOBBTZAL DISTRICT. Within any "LB-IA", LR-lA-1", -LR-IB*, "LR-IC*, or "LR-lC-1* One Family Lakeshora Rasldantlal District the following regulations shall applyt Subd. 1. Lakeshora Sat Back Regulations. The sat back from the shoreline for lakeshora lots shall be at least 75 feat and no building may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent and nearby lots. Subd. 2. Lakeshora Bard Cover Regulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hard cover, temporary or permanent structures. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hard cover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hard cover. Within 500 to 1,000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hard cover. Subd. 3. Tree Removal Regulations. No trees within 75 feet of the shoreline with the diameter of six (6) Inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the Council. V ■' v' i ■ *# ^ Ak j r l:' f '1^ ✓ r __ Jh t- ' % / EK MCOIATIOl^ MIDA*BAKPOOVCT ORDimWCT - In 1975- n» ll■^» /««<..«< ktl» parcraUf* of lot aroa that etn ba cotaral «lt"h laolrt^^ *" ordlnanca llaltinp aneh aa roofa. dttvaaava .la—la. “ *“» laparvloua aurfacaa Chardcotaf)a lata. noSla. hi^Vh^-o^t aail-^tT *•“'> »' Cl^naad by flltarlb, throu,h ,taaa.d ot t.,.tatV/;a7ra"ia"'b*.V.r7'‘.:t7rr“ Ba HAig)COVER _SETBACK ZOHBS «• PBRCgNTACT Ai.T^^inm la 0-75*1 in th« (Oi)a within 75* of the lakeehore. Wo Hardcover is alloyed Jii.;s.”o;’thit" u«roj7rt;:f ”»• *"■ -• thVr.j7i.7f \i:/”\\7.Vf\h*a\:‘t 7r^*irVc”Vr^!°' •”" *"* Jr* thVlJiV^ o‘f" .7a*t Vf 7o‘t »;‘b7.7rroV.tJJ“' Ca gow TO D8TBRM1WB LOT AREA WITHIW EACH SETBACK ZONK (To -- - -- hardcover percentage calculations)as denominator in all !• 0-75 * Zone Area - 75* a /Average width of lot in 0-75* sone measure parallel to shoreline•*(' ') ft. - (Avg width)Area of 0-75* zone 11. 75-250* Zone Area - (175'or avg lot depth in sone) x/Avg width of lot in 75-250* zoneV J4-0 _ ' measure parallel to shoreline / ■-«»*«—/4-^ ft. . .aO|SOQ ,j, (Avg width)Area of 75-250* zone 111. 250-500* Zona *r,a . (250- or lot dapth In ton.) xfAv, .Idth of lot In 250-500' tonal \ measure parallel to shoreline } 250* X Ma ft. - (Avg width)8af. (3) Area of 250-500* zone IVa 500—1,000* Zone (500 or avg lot depth in zone) x^Avg width of lot in 500-1000* zone^ measure parallel to shoreline 500* X _ H A ft. - __ _ _ _ _(4, (Avg width) Area of 500-1,000* zone J i. ^ 1 %•>rs ■■ r -v^ V. -m J, i > r 4 a < ^ ^ / > 1; !/ • I « w ■ %k •J m , vi^m r f • ♦ • J/r"^ \ * * ^ f, f ^ r' f \ . \ , f V O>r»»-4CO a »i » M as Os H* 3 M Oo Cft HI m Hi M oo 5\ M M M M HI« cr c • y h: 3 H fci • a «» 3 <t *o <a •» ck1-4 H 9 m M» 9 *-• O3 9 9 903 rr M*M- 3n m o •»f» 9n rr ftr (H.o &n XT*S DO ^ m m > 111 j • • • HI HI HI • • HI HI HI • • • HI HI Hi HI V V V ui tK) UIo to UIo 2 •o O 0 1>-•ooo « sa > 7$ 0n 1 5d nSn >H Mi £ O 50 7^cnaww •3H 0 ■8m 1 ? Haoo < (D H rH- 3 • > a Qi i H* 3 Ir* 3 9 •flM* 3 9 lo •d Ho•8 9 9 M Ht ft- 9a 0 tr 9 w 1 9 Qi 0 >r» d) •a 0 n $d 1a 3 ftar Qi ft 3* W M M* 9 ft M» 3 iQ ? H Oboos •1 fto cr 9 ii H* 3 fts r» CO •a mn §o !i 3 a ftar 2 Xf 3 >r» Hi > Ob Ob H* ft H* o 39 M a 9 Haoo<9 ♦t ft O S' 9aa 9a »-• 3 No 3 9•« vO ? HI J « HI ? H* 9 ft H* 3 10 s t1ao 11 H M M 9 HI 9 9 9 9 • • • ^ • » IW t_r_ OAOo kj o •I k ■ : IV. fO ^ ^•a HI m HI > XT m HI S' ft > *1 9 5 ftar M O3 9 ? ft 9 M nM I— 9 ft H* 3 19 a 9 tiano < 9 H M O O Ji 4; ■\ J r. »#•*# *■ ■¥■ 'k r f* r rJ 3 to « Ml a *3 M 0 ? 01 fO W X M. M M* 3 •Final 11 1 j ! X M. » ft i >a a 1n vi tr^r *IFa ? Mao W ft p-fc 3<o <w ♦ H- ^ r-K> 0 S 3 *d > ' 4 ft (D 3 0 Lng HardItems ^ <0 < (0 9 f»s s< H s; 0 a CO ♦ X P-*oo *1 1 cr a • 0 K9 f M* 9 o ^ *8 ” S M ••LengthfD > M t-P rt 01 0 • ?Length0 • § r IP M ft 01 # ^ ■0 a t • Ul d »n M M M H H ? ^ 5 ®0 n X X H M M 1 Dp 3 tr 1 s Qj 3 M* < 2 >a o' o C aa 1 (£S> • Ml • 0 1 < p 1 o a 1 1 f 1 • a ft 3* 1 w M. O Ml 9 3 <1 ■ 1■ H*arr 3*? 1 N 0 oo M. 3 D> w X H* to ft M. 3 ID 3 D Q. O O < fO N o t 01w • 9% m Ml II Ml Ci Ml TOTAL1 > .Cf • 9% •N)•CO •m • u CO • Ml S'rr > <» fli Mar 9 Mo 3 ? ft Dp P— n X H* W ft- 3 3 Qp Ma Ml Oo s > 33 O O O S 33 O > 0 G > M 1 5:o 50 3:w Xw J . , r L y'*" % . » 1. N V V \ ^ TFj'/vr^^ n rr.j«-r ' rj .-.^> •i.T* ^ ^' '■»: N »•.7.'!7 tfr^A^*-; • <f^ « • ' • .•r<o . r.'..*': KC.''Ca. Cl '>U —f scpA?^ ?Co^^ L’f-''e _• > /s>’ f I '<• r =?fc[i (..) Qo ^ - * ^ t* \ - •. r ■ 4 ■ eXH. jr 1 4iiiP’g«<i m J e'’-^ , i t .'■■ f ’ 4 I f r ; J ♦r ► 5 - r, .i \ I 1 \ • » 1 *( 4 i •4 f J .♦ I %« f < 4r 4 r J PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CIT? OP OROHO MEETING DATE ♦ PLEASE PIU# OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. RAMS (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER ij:____^Nic>, Lxy,%,U'% 2_i_. -:ar.Ktx^p i'-' I'i Cl 6)7 3. ”7j.-V\ ^pU/j/Vn r^ ' '1 4 . tJ ci-* tf ITB-Mm P.L^ 5. W\^A.vja«j •^Act.'KCjX' Lrt> Z *i' AAl, {T» Cv 1 7 7 • (IjirL^r/ J^e' .I------------- 9. £/j/r/^^^2Z<f^0 Alun^Ja^ /Vm// .0. CJt'^/ “^O^S' J^t lOJiJLl /[jJ / e i 1 ,4. 1 ^^20 5 /fy 5.^^ >o^------------------------ 6. ^. C\>^.4^> K<rr jCrp>\ 7 • Vr )\\}sNooi^ .AaXL C ' f i ^>^3^ 1 V.I v|j ^ ^ 1 \ -H']Ha>v 3 jvIaLn-CLCU f i. PJ 9 9. //(V, c-rM y Ji',0 ijJ K<fhlVU. K*c(- i— ■ L0. -fl^uA I72i __z_______ ^-t 4 f ^ , ♦ 4.At J % ■‘‘r' ' ^ ‘V ^ y) .1 I t 4 1 4 • i 4 % ' ' ' •I ’’ ■• .-;a Mi L-,^mw' ^ W i r /‘i1 J *, / * { f. t ♦\ 0m « 1 % f i% t.% # i i \ ; < •» i • 3T . * i m 0 ? 1 I :|i 1 PUBLIC ATTENDANCECITY OF ORONO fOlETIHG DATE J/Zp PLEASE FILL CXTf THE IMFOfinAflOB EEQUES^ BELCH FOR OCR CITY I^CORDS. NAME (please print )l ADDRESS MANE OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda^ 1. Dnrt*. ATpi'^z- ~5> / f rr' M /c^ K(j B ____—/ -j—f - 2.vi)(Lirdnxi i i3 ^ ns Lo--r- „i3 i. - - i n Am i ^ 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. • • 15. 16.•i j18.1 19.roo• V ’■ t Vnf r PUynilB OOMMISSIOH MEETIilQ AT, JULY 18, 1888 7s00 P.N.1275 mam rnm ) south - oodw cil cHMOins8>t.l MCIL HSPHBSBHTATIVB - Barbara Peterson f • h i 't-KL• « Pit -. \ ’ * • f ^ i ♦ I i SOBDUUD PUBLIC HBMtIHG 1. 7i00 p.a. #1301 David L. White & Fredrick C. White, 180 Worth Shore Drive West - Class 3 Preliainary Subdivision 2. 9t00 pa. Zoning Aaendaent - Signage 3. 9tl5 p.B. Zoning Aaendaent - Fences JKCTIOH ITBI8 4. #1207 Gene i Catherine Scanlon, 2815 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit & Variance - Third Review 5. #1288 Gary Roderick Construction, 1749 Worth Farm Road - Variance - Second Review 8. #1291 Alfred Iverson, 2835 Casco Point Road - Referred Back to Planning Commission by Staff 7. #1300 Anthony Eiden, 2290 & 2340 Abingdon Way - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing S. #1302 City of Orono, Crystal Bay Road laprovement - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 9. #1303 Allan Rezabek, 1989 Fagerness Point Road - Variance ~ Public Hearing a 10. #1304 Richard Bloomquist/Super Valu, 3333 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Public Hearing 11. #1305 Washington Scientific Inc., 2805 West Waysata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 12. #1308 Metro Waste Control Commission, 3288 Worth Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 13. #1307 Doug Merz, 3195 Watertown Toad - Variance - Public Hearing 14. #1308 Robert Owens, 1700 Bohns Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing SRETBCB FLAW REVIEW 15. City of Orono - Plan for Bike/Riking Trails - Park Commission -* Bob Kost - John Gerhardson ADDITIOHAL ITEMS 18. Planning Commission approval of June 20, 1988 Minutes. 17. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the August 8, 1988 Council Meeting. ■-r. ADJOOR a' m: % « . J Ir t y"it ! 11n • 'it •/ >» f- ?r m : '■■i :P'^1;;:'■'■P-W ' V; > K -vk • » ' ’ #/ I ' * Jr I y ^ i f t \ « ' , ! R!.rrh&. ']ln/s26m/?r 'J co/’x.J^PuQfii^ PRtsir^ C-j/WlX' tx,FMf/t^ H}iw'Soitti>iiUbisfl^uu£ihfrA!t^ Jj'iTt/W. /iCCif^'S S'/totuiJ Loe^-r' /^T0 StUt/<ftA tOd?t biSiaSsW- f\pputM^ tm£^U> knutu fF> fur t^/ diioeA 6m^ ck: Flom^ PhFtuJ)(u^. CtHW P mtWOux Umt A ctual [tN-id IrJtvLD Uki to 5tL Hm Ftfi. kJnuL P(\f.ttL, ^orJim'hAT2 LCT5 k CufUn' IMl kUmrPJMb 16 I^TIT^TW ItJ K/SOOMb \F ACCF^T) Cmix> ()t iriACLPbA Ik Pmm. Htuj'i b&nr fyum bf^6Mw SuHiw Cw^'w6 4/Sfe^THtoifFJFb fbR Owuxfifi ft/f ATtP0b(W¥ltff\AP^5mMi?t.(wi^ JoUtbCN^ AbPStliiAF A yMtCcrrMl^UltlPA^J 16 bftPtD nim^ w TABLLlkfiJiofit im ku. tn ii il ' ) «« i. u vl"WT : C‘ k #: ■fc..1 '% lS, S-:' •i. .•!«.•> 1;' : * V- :v ’ ' - ••ft:, •. •• : ':X, ■ ■' " V ^. ♦ pM; i > «• : A . J •• * t ‘mSS) 4^u m h •. * -V 4 -n S ^/mjt rettfA'Taofi^ucAtjr'i Pt^K^ 3fK>pH'ihLi. (^e£)uavx> ia) ^PCiCWfA PtAfit) Hfiif l^teu kpPRWiO Kf/xv hPiD •HlfiVTCti^. N0 (Vtvmf/l'TS • ^^/WiW ClWitPCfcD Ttifm fiA/ PfttmuiD^d kiemH-Sudntx To &mm A0£. WijTtDlc \A)id:K] ^mycoJidCciudh fkauto- iMJt IQs9- fo Sifjjkjoio 'PfiiM- lyto dor Tmipr tf V.*.CoKSuritjr l\Jm P ol____ ._ .... , #5 2>1o iRR^M.s ^PPUCHAR C-^fTPctU PyPLAiPtoPfoP^^O l/ARiWot.. f^RRucMr(})fmiinw TV av Ht buo dorTHtdR. ir lihus dnwtPt. '^iTH 6/ e^r /If imdXtmtAJ. Btfi RiU) Urj hMtprf. Cd^aX) Id {kpimi^fmvJO (TiPcvW fhrpexp 0PfAli6i . PAouTiLT 2 0]tAj Sii/nmiO \T Up RA'cTT'/tTiLL ^ CotitK^ fi^ Rk%iP?/t. lltOUfltUiA! KtiALdSumctA'OO&reas. AfPumfmoTi^i^TKPt/W^klm KiiLi/>loi^To A a /V ^Cc^iK' 2 PM pLL h^ltP- ^RtLd UM'lLiMTfi #7 A d £a / Pptdtfn'JUPdd'oPLAWcD -fo RQpLitAA/rTfVrT IFfhjD CcMis ?t Mom 6 ' Pffcr Po ikpiApct Wotud 6e d^mo oa /av A (2*iOinDAA.tl6tftMtT. Ptity kMO kQrwrhtdvolb jU)Agi£-L&0. 'PP^k^io A6a/F OMEtiuJ. do PMcm W (Trf Afifu cAncd btspi tLcuio k CtMctM' kemr fiocu RiG P aid p . OoncefiLi A&tcr ^eA'ATWa'—Al05®(urC6. ptuyt ldT£f!X2aXD 7fWr2nftLi_ Pew 3PpuG damifid G-kkpaw.m Qoum-loiJ- Ptncij6i PiLPi To fiPfRO'/t 3u^3lpr'T6 CwPiWOtdi ■ Akln/6ov Pzt»JC)tD. A ll Id FP^dH - ik^'icf) J % ' U f I I 'fu Ml / 't > ■U^i nsa JtAfJNt^^iK^. kuM h'm iFPiimcIh^^ kpum*.' l n£uc Hrf\StM-oP -t^crA hAawtD fk^wa/i'l Ubf\km^. 6cnw PihwTfmLt. Ut-'CtoVA.k^uovr. miWotP, l^Ao (r itwib- -^■1 bltK£{u_ - 6mMUr£S s. l^^ujhOt. A/)t/?5£M6 ^ Ai.T^ \ / #9 ()/ 5 iRfAmi ^1 y lJA\/t Ikyrtm 5 FftT dlAKt ksmim (hmf^G ^kJoiF 7huk ^ (mjc Air Smo ^mw OcMtcrtG/, 7c PtuS7>ti0K ’0io f\u, lA/ A^i'at . ^UA k'f^zAAtML . fM.F/6HiA VAttfi-f, Ktu^ 6^b«eM)tcr viiAr^7t>uJr OP XsSud LO a^TO D^i/^J a \Mu ^^ . l^^5y^cP C ^^WUF/m)^''Otihftrs ktmm SM£. fy\mo^bO(A^^ Kiu'-i SemPtD. Ta^'^^monw I3o A> SG^tA/£>OA/ ToFAGCi-j C(yi&J Q/JO(:D AcL/M AaM 410. biP/66t£> ■1^4/^513 hPucmPAfGwr nw^UiTc. kmits CojcL ^cfPaH acpX Sf%^^ Fy\Voii CA PfWcsW PtAhl, Fmw t) PfiA/iOut. C«,7?a'6E a,T /^a' Sa/LAc/llG l^AM rs Aa'D 7trbiy<ji- FFjbojuo losut- Ktia 24) Au. iAiFfy\io(l^ P/4^ PA6iio0vtA ^4' j.?V ’il:* -:i I*/I* f': % .4 4m ♦■ / U » <( J 11* f ‘^3*. Q: ItL' • % % » /lb OSs>^ ft^u6a<u ^’'XvrifA.'^. .ikA-sev/ricve<9 ?fc"^(■Cem/rifAiD ApP^^'/<C ^//M556Z3 tuM^dhj CW/rus^-^e^/<?Of>w«f,. ^ />We»^ /)UoL7a hmAir\ y ^ic^o ^■'^410 Nlo OMt Pi^tScAjr ^now To ^tc*w\'cAV f\fff(b\/Pii-' OF ^trr -Staw. Sfi'fcx 5maH S^ceftjO£D imFmc/L ■^a T^to ^S^SSW - LAk JDUNWC j , ^'’«56. ■K>0 MoFfc ^ hii^oMSiOrJ OfJ Jn/n fi-1 ^ i ~2£HJiUb /\fYi‘ifjO{f)Ujr^-^C:^AbL Cj/WfioU^K/? C^MVNWrtO AI g NX/ 6v ■fe OF£nAfAr\KJ^N %ihi^A(JL ku ■^^#3 {jmfimhPLAww kt5wrdc(4-ht Pf^o^tp CMANets MM) 6v kid ^15 /ov 3rj^r/l (!o\/(:^A; 410 w/?et«/5 (Vat tfuciAuNkAi,- ^ • 50 /Hfew6 Ea/o J PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WHITE POND ESTATES #1301 LAND description Hennepin County Cast Iran Monument Northeast Corner of Northweet Ouorter of Section 6, Township 117 Nortti Range 23 West Th« U«st Half of tHa Northwest Quarter c' (►.f Nor|h„e*t Quarter e«cect that part of the West Z7A.77 feet which :iej south of the Ncrth 580.P0 feet and north of the South 545.34 feet s-u e-cept the East i?.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of the South 470.00 feet of the North 503.00 feet thereof and e«capt the East IS.00 feet of the west 65.00 feet of the South 30.00 feet of the North 8B.O0 'eet thereof. Section 6, Township 117, Ranoe 23 according to the :--^.erheent Surrey thereo'. drainage and utility easements are SHC’AN THUS: 1 -4 1 [—5 o 1 o _i__1 1__i_ Area of Lot 1 including wetland 130,855.501 Sq. Ft. 3.004 Acres Area of Lot 1 excluding wetland 87,386.906 Sq. Ft. 2.006 Acres Area of Lot 2 including wetland 209,425.735 Sq. Ft. 4.808 Acres Area of Lot 2 excluding wetland 134,476.070 Sq. Ft. 3.087 Acres Area of Outlot A 409,568.106 Sq. Ft. 9.402 Acres f f BEING 5.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWSE SHOWN. AND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON THE FLAT. 60 METERS BASIS FOR bearings is ASSUMED O DENOTES SET 5/8 INCH REBAR AND I 1/4 INCH plastic CAP MARKED WITH LICENSE No I725S OWNER•• DAVID L. WHITE 8 FREDERICK C. WHITE developer : FREDERICK C. WHITE LAND SURVEYOR: MARVIN G LOVLEIN 6025 ABBOTT AVE. NO. BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 7^, VICINITY MAP Range 23 Wttt I hereby certify Ihoi thi, aurvey wo, prcporti by me, or under my direct lupervWon, on ) ihot I om 0 duly Regietered Lond Surv^ror laider the low, of the State of Mirmewto Doie.TA^ '.V.»jWR.g No PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WHITE POND ESTATES / Coun»» CoD tram = «*> ■^T , Morth int cH NorWMSt OuorMr / «r Sk «. T«p M7. hh 23 I I 9 Mti» ««» I / 7~-‘n<m -------3' -"-r^L >33 00 COUNTYm3000 NOO'SrtO'W cxjtlot a Hsnnapin Cotftty Cost Iron Monumont Northtosf CofROr of Northwost Quorlor of Soctiofi 6. Township II7 North Ronqs 23 Wsst of W«st H< ihwtft Ougrtor of Northvnt Quorfor ot S«c 6. T.p M7. Rot 23 'Hsnnspfn County Cost Iron Monufntnt Southwsst Cornsr of Northwost Ouarttr of Ssction 6, Township 117 North N oaqs 23 Wost 1 -4 1 h-* o ®H 2 _i ___1 L___L_ Bf NG « 00 FEET IN WIC^ AN: AC-C NINC #1301 LAND DESCRIPTION w««t 0* IN* Northwttl 9„trlt*- 1 ‘ •*'« tht* c*rt a* t»*t Utit r?*.?"? »t*t N*<IC»* .1** 0* tH» Hor»*« SSO.OO »tt« t"t forth ef tnt Soyth S«b,3« »ttt «'a titpl th» Ct«t I'.OO 9f INt WtBl St.Ot *t#t 9t tNt South T«»t of t >• i|ort»- SSi.Pf fttt (htrtef and txctct th« Cast JS.Ot 5« th« i.^«i SS.OS »t«t tht South 5#.to fttt of tht North ll.tt itetio' fi. Tounthip 117. StfQt tJ tocora»"0 to tht - .*'~-«trt S.,f -t. lht'#;». Art* of Lot 1 including wttland 130,855.501 Sq. Ft. 3.004 Acrtt Arta of Lot 1 txcluding wetland 87,386.906 Sq. Ft. 2.006 Acres Area of Lot 2 including wetland 209,425.735 Sq. Ft. 4.808 Acres Area of Lot 2 excluding wetland 134,476.070 Sq. Ft. 3.087 Acres Area of Outlot A •*09,568.106 Sq. Ft. 9.402 Acres /f Q DENOTES SET 5/8 iKfCH REBAR AND t 1/4 INCH Plastic cap MARKfii «>th l 'CENSE No I72S8 owner; d/wid l. white a developer: FREDERICK C. LAND SURVEYOR: MARVIN FREDERICK C. WHITE WHITE VICINITY MAP Gl LOVLEIN 6025 ABBOTT AVE. NO. BROOKLYN CENTER. MN ■fV. 44. 4J tlo.. No I heiepy cerfify !ho* Hirt survey ees wsRored o ov> m n r* Or A ^ 3?' 3 0 3 3 O 3^3- Jr'** * 3 -* O U> 0>-H IDA !|jr *ll; r- m CJ 33 O 3 O o 30 -1 3 <0 ^ O. A 3 0 •• f- A 3 cn ^ -1 W A ^ ■A A «» • Ci\ iJ- -o3|A • X 3 O r. A*- Q. -• 3 A3 r- ^ A A 3«3 t/» 3 O Q f* » » A i/> A A C lO «o 1 • « A -£ a: V o o n gr 2 *' y = o ? 5 - ^ 3 - ® :; ? 5 5 2 S .X. ^ •< o> -n o 2 ; I ^ K - 3 V. s 5 O m \ I * 1 ^.»«lr.4 \ y -< (V|/'7/: ■ ■■:l o.*.. (R) » $ ''304 :''i r Q “i : 5 i^^ is s 4,* 4240 •(i24tN 683 41 ^ T . . tS94S- N«4*I2 08 im 45 .&. 3/253<> i/i52 3/if: • j;? tu ^L'AKE s iH lat 2 2? J.’a " WEST 3 |8'- 1' 'i; ? ^ ? . tr'» f*/# INDUSTRIAL: C" •'. » -•/ .<• . t hern V I or MMO ■ Spark § MCr? SiZ I 1 S 1 =ACRtS ; = 'l.« p '(.« ' mm ^*aKtL*cMH MIVB • tertartt ^»t*rMa 1. fiM fa. laalftf i »• ftlt foi. 9mmlmt j CmA1U«m1 Om fmit •« tllfl AXfr«4 tmmm, m$ Cm» Pmimt »Mi • MmfmmS M€k tm PlWMiaf CmbAmIm hf Bfit 9mix • ■•irtiif mf tmt4 lafrvwa Mil* Mriaf It. |nt4 tlelMirt v*l«. v*rl*M • MUc aMriiit mi tbmnXi — 9riw • City *C Or«B« • rUa f*« »ilM/llki0« Tralla - rmti CmmAmimm - M iMt - Jate tarlMrtMa It. rUMlikt OvalMlMi ffia wl at J m at. Ittt IT. .ImtM O—U.IM t. MlMt • M M*mi« «ta ItM Cwwclt / w. •TT //uf/®. o - Denofea iron monumen/ found Area • 29,500 scjuare feof toy certltV to Paul S. Corot, Jack Crocker and Norttowestem relational Bank, thla la a true and correct representation of a survey cf ttie ooundarlea oft That part of Lot Three (3), tn "Auditor's Subdivision No. 349, Hsnnepln Cots^^, Minnesota" dascrtbed as follows; Conr>menclng at the point of Intersection of the Southoastsrly line of Lot 11 in said Auditor's Subdivision No. 340 and dividing line between Lots 3 and 4 In said subdivision; thenos Southeasterly along the dividing line between sstd Lots 3 and 4 a distance of 114.BS feat to bw angle point In said dividing llns, said point being the actual point of benlnntrvi AUH ■■M f :vO^ 'TYf't^i Of i-: -! ‘ # r-----------* *-i —j— T 't ' P 4 - ~lb» ?Uf * f4*l^ UfT A-" ia». i»b.»o4 ■'' *-#••• <5> v-y^jf ..£ ft-IJi .^v£ .'•.. «f/r »• m. 4-^4 I f!^.------» I -^r -jr. f ■!' tiVcf tiftfi-r U»lt fjy. It 1M.7I iritr ^ILL ^/^Uc V'AUILT ..t.J le's' • -. - I , /ci <9i /?v » I 5 ^ 7’J" t)>^ -