Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-14-1994 Council Packet
: I \ ! I ? f ‘ \GENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOV*EMBER 14, 1994, 7:30 P.M. OTON^ 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA n Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item- on the agenda. Memos regarding each ^ available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Rcc ;ill Perseli ROLL CALL OATH OF OFFICE - Pan Time Police Officers Neal CflYo; ^ * 1. CONSENT AGENDA ! • . approval of minutes * 2. Regular Meeting of October 24. 1994 j b ^ PARK CONLMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING CONLMISSION COMMENTS - Sandra Smith Representative PLDLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMLNISTRATOR’S REPORT t ;^1S95 Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road - After the Fact Variances , o wj •• umi Lp Profe'rties/Roben Olson/Irvin Geffte. 4645/4665 Bayside Road - Fmal Subdivision Approval • Resolution5 Citv of Orono, 1355 Brown Road South-Variance-Resoluiion . „ , . , 6. #1 W Briin Kipfer/Greg Sargent. 320 Tumham Road - Condiiional Use Permit • Resolution of Ocni^l , 7 #1972 Daniel J. Radford, 3593 Crystal Place - Variance - Resolution „ , . ^8 #1976 Don P. Gamble. III. 4680 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution 9’ #1977 Uwrence & Marilyn Dorr. 980 Tonkawa Road - Variance • Resolution ** 10. 1994 Marina License - Windward Marina .mayor /council report HI:^— -'TJ U^Itt !fA^m?s R^^eiLtions Finance Department Segregation of Duties 14 Renewal of Insurance Agent of Record jfl5. Orono High School Girls Tennis Team Recognition • Resolution 16 Public Works Purchase of Cab for Ice Rink Sweeper 17. Request for Street Light at Old Crystal Bay Road North and County Road 6 .yl8. Proposed 1995 Meeting Schedule 19 Navarre Water Plant Study 20! Establish Public Hearing Date - Personal Watercraft Ordinance 21. Contracted Sump Pump Inspector r * i i ■ 1 ArFNDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1994, 7:30 P.M. ^NO CoS Cl^IBERS. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY. ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (*22.) LICENSES (*23.) BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 11/09- 11/09- ll/ll - 11/14 - n/16- 11/21 - 11/24 - 11/25 * 11/28 * 11/29 « 12/05 • 12/12 12/19 12/23 12/26 Canvassing Board meeting 4:00 p.m. Council Work Session (scptic/sewer) 4:15 p.m. HOUDAY - Veteran’s Day Observed Council meeting 7:30 p.m. . Highway 12 Policy Committee meeting 5:30 p.m. - Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. . HOLIDAY - Thanksgiving Day - HOLIDAY Office Closed - Council meeting 7:30 p.m. . Tnith In Taxation Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. - C?und?rac^^^ P^m. (last regular scheduled meeting of the year) . Truth in Taxation continuation • if needed - Holida) - (floating holiday) - Holiday - Observance of Christmas holiday r puanniio connzsszon PUBLZC ATTBNDANCB MIBTZNO DATE I (- / 4 ^9 V PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. MANE (plMsa print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (Cron agondo) NAME OR NONBER \ M AkifL i Pu.'i A filcuMAtU Ptt.AQc |9-76 "WaMI I — ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 24,1994 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Council met on the above date with the following members present; Mayor Callahan. Jr., Council Members J. Diann Goetten, Gabriel Jabbour, and JoEHen Hurr. ^0 Charles Kelley was absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator, Ron Moorse; City Attorney, Tom Barrett; Building and Zoning Adnunistrator, Jeanne Mabusth; Public Works Director. John Gerhardson, City Engineer. Glenn Cook, and Recorder. Shetry Frost MayorCaUahancalledthemeetingtoorder at 7:30p.m (•#1) CONSENT AGENDA Item #2 was deleted and Items #3,4.7.10. 11, 12, and 13 were added to the Consent Agenda. Goetten moved. Jabbour seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (#2) REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 10,1994 Hurr changed paragrai^ 1 of page 8 adding the word "only" in the sentence reading. "noting pnly the driveway access will be in the right of way." Hurr moved. Jd>bour seconded, the approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meetirtg of October 10. 1994, as amended. Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Lili McMillan, representing the Park Commission, had no comments at thb time. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS No member of the Plaiming Commission was present. PUBUC COMMENTS The public had no comments. POUCE CHIEF REPORT Chief Sullivan had no comments. Council member Jabbour expressed his, and lus wife's, appreciation of Officer English in his professional handling of the recem accident on Hwy 12. Officer English was first on the scene. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24. 1994 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (•#3) #1959 JAMES OGLAND, 3345 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #34S2 Goetten moved. Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resohition #3482. granting setback, hardcover and lot coverage variances to James Ogland at 3345 Crystal Bay Road. Ayes 4. Nays 0. (•#4) #1947 K>P PROPERTIES/ROBERT OLSON, 4645 BAYSIDE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - RESOLUTION #3483 Goetten moved. Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3483, granting preliminary approval for a plat at 4645/4665 Bayside Road for Robert S. OIsoil Irvin GeflEre, ami K> P Properties, Inc.. File #1967. Ayes 4. Nays 0. (#5) #1965 GUSTAFSON DESIGN/JAMES LEAR, 2525 DUNWOODY AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3484 Mabusth reported the implication is for a CUP and a variance to reconstruct retaining walls in lakeshore yard to repair a fiuling lakeshore bank. The waUs range from 2* to 8* in height and are designed of flat stones and the use of geo-grid fabric. A series of steps ate also included as well as rip-rap. Loss of juniper trees will occur but an extensive planting schedule will insure planting to replace lost trees. Council member Hurr feh the shed in the 0-75* zone should be removed. Mr. Lear said the back wall of the shed was made of concrete and assisted in preventirig erosion. The other walls are made of wood. The shed houses the irrigation ^stem. The Plaimiiig Comtiusaon had stipulated that the 43 s.f. shed could not be replaced but a confoimii^ lock box would be allowed. Hurr moved. Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3484 as amended, granting a conditional use permit and variance to James Lear of2525 Dunwoody Avenue for construction of retaining walls and associated hardcover in the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone to require removal of 43 s.f shed and replacement with 20 s.f lock box. The cement-block wall may remain. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#6) #1960 NAVARRE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, 3655 TOGO ROAD - VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3485 Applicant, Tor Johnson, and Representative, Jeff Metzger, were present. MINUTES OF THE REGiaAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24.1994 (M - #1960 • Navarre Cmtgregation of Jehovah's Witnesses - Continued) Mabusth reported the application was for an extention of the driveway and parking lot to the south and rear ofthe easting lot. Two adrfitions also needed CUP review The PiaiwHtig Commisuon gave their approval of the side setback variance of 47 for a carport where is reqinred. The main issue is drainage from the church is located in a 30 acre watershed. An improved method of retfireOing the drainage on the eastside is planned to relieve i»MiAip during heavy lains. Two options availid)le for conveying drainage are fitiMir a swale or 12" underground tile. The residence to the east has old underground tile system but it durii^ heavy rain. This scdution should alleviate some of the problem by canyn^ the runoff to a cul^ under Togo Road eventually draimng into the wetland to the north. Staff will ask the church to grant an easemem over the drainageway Represemative MeUger reported the owners to the east have app^ed their plan and will provide a letter to the City stipulating their approval. Mabusth said the City will require both property owners to a|^>ly for the land-aheration permit. After inquiring. Hurr was informed that at the public hearing this applkatioa received no conqdttiits from the neighborhood repcHtir^ a positive reaction for the drains solution possibilities. Callahan asked Cook about the affect on the Cuff property (Navarre Heights), who has previously had an application beftne the Council. Cook advised that the Cuff property located further south eventually drains to this watershed. labbour brought to the Applicant and Council's att'mtion. the Staff recommendation for the drainage easement. 15' in width, being 7.5* on either side of ^ final culvert/swale location within the appficams* property. The applicant was asked if he was in agreement widi this recommendation. Metzger said he was but would warn assistance with the cost ofthe materials. Jabbour commented that the City would likely assess for the arnoum the City paid so there would be no gain to the appheam. h was noted that engincefing was provided free to the apidicant. Hurr moved. Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3485 granting a hardcover variance, structural setback variance and structural additions conditional use pernut for the Navarre Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses at 3655 Togo Road. Ayes 4. Nays 0. (•#7) #1970 SCOTT MICHAEL WOLD, 3026 CASCO POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3486 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3486 for a conditional use permit for Scott Wold at 3026 Casco Point Roul. Ayes 4, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24. 1994 (#S> #1974 TYLER CORBIN, U$S NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- RESOLUTION #34S7 Mr. .Cofbin was present. Mabusth reported that the former property owner was before the Council in 1982 for a CUP and variance to allow two tiers of retaining wall and stairs that have since deteriorated. This application has been amended to include a three>tier boulder wall, 4' in hdghL with a walkvmy and access slurs to the dtordine. TMs includes an increase to the hardcover amount in the 0-75' zone only because the calculations were done after the original stairs were removed. Mabusth said the Planning Conumssion gave conditional approval fof the permit with a stipulation to provide a landscapii^ plan to buffer the starkness of the walls as wdl as removal of a driveway within die 0-75'zone, located on the east side of the prt^wrty within a five-year period. This would allow the driveway to exist up to where the entrance to tte toick-undcr garage is located for access to the gar^. The Planning Comnnssion addressed the financial hardslup allowhtg the driveway removal to occur over a five-year time period. The hardcover is 28% in the 0-75' zone and 64% in the 75-250* zone. The Plaimhtg Commisston fdt this was excessive. The apf^cant's porition was that he did not put the hardcover in, as the property is still as he bought iL nor has he added to it. Mabusth said the City was concerned with the driveway and rqiorted that in the three land-use files on record, none of the inqrroveniem plans showed the acceis drive. The most recent apfdication plan shows only the two-tiered retainiiig wall. Mr. Corbin said the builder he hired to replace the deteriorated timber wall was to have applied for a permit and did not. He reiterated Ms o|»nion that tins project will actually decrease the hardcover percentage in the 0-75' zone, even though die plans show an increase, because of the calculations having been done after the original walls were removed. His plan is to install grass in the area between the old walls. Corbin remarked he would also like to include lot 74, wluch he owns, in the hardcover calculations and would be willing to combine lots if necessary. Goenen asked for clarification on the hardcover amount. It was noted that the City has only the amount listed on the application and what is visibly there now to go by. Goetten informed the aiqilicant that the only time the City has an opportunity to make improvements on a property is when an applicalion such as tMs comes before the Council for a variance or CUP. The Council is concerned with the runoff entering the lake fiom the driveway in question. Jabbour redirected the Council to look at the previous applications brought before the Council in 1976,1978, and 1982. Nowhere did the driveway present itself on any application. Jabbour's opinion is that the applicant should a^ for a variance for tins dfWeway. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24.1994 (#8 - Item #1974 - Corbin - Continued) Hurr also noted that the area between the tuck>under garags and the driveway is listed as beinggrass. The applicant confirtned that the area in front of the garage door is cement This would add more hardcover to the percentages now listed. During discussion. Cook said that no new watts would be needed if the driveway was removed. Hurr said that the time limit of five years would be diffiwh to track. Jabbour commented that financial obligation cannot be a Actor in determinii^ hardship, and noted money could be saved if the work was done at the same time as the retaining watts. Jdbbour moved, Cioetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3487 for a conditional use permit for Tyler Corbin at 4685 North Shore Drive with the condition of removii^tte driveway bi the 0-75' zone per the Planning Commission recommendation. The appficam has the option to remove said driveway now or be given a one-year grace period requiring the applicam to post one-and-t-half times the cost of removal. Ayes 4. Nays 0. (#9) #1978 WESTONKA INTERVENTION PROJECT, 2380 SHADYWOOD ROAD Mr. Hesshurg, Director of Westonka Intervention Project was present. Callahan reported the project is looking to begin a shelter for battered women and thefr children at the old Grace Baptist Church buildiiig in Navarre. The shelter would consist of nine sleepily rooms for mothers and their children. The average stay is 17 days. Counscfiqg would be provided. The present zoning code does not pemut such a use. The applicant is requestu^ an amendment be made ofthe zoning code. The Planning Conmnsrion said the pr use has merit at this location. Callahan asked Mr. Hessburg about the project's application with the City of Mound to use the Our Lady-of-the-Lake Convem for a sheher Hessburg reported the Mound Planning Commission catted for a puirfic hearing because of the location being within 3(Xy of a residential area. 12 Citizens voiced fear ofviolence and a possible decrease in piopeity value if such a shdter was located there. Even though the projert presented dau to n^e those fears, the Mound Council said the site was inappropriate for a •m M. *shelter and would check into other zonii^ p Jabbour said this site appeared to be an appropriate location for a shelter. Goetten agreed but was concerned with chan^g the zoning code. Hessburg noted the school districts of Westonka, Orono. and Minnetonka all have service near the area to bus children to their schools. The location is also convenient for shopping and other bus services. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24.1994 (M9 - Iteni #1978 - Weslonka Imervemion Project - Continued) Hessbuis reported the project works with t network of agencies. Due to the larysc need for shdters of this type, maiiy times holds and safe houses are used to assist victims. Pottoe agencies are required by the State to work with agencies such as tins. Victim advocates are contact^ by the police, who provide counsding and placrnem in shdters. Callahan asked how these programs are started. Hesdnirg said plans are drawn up and block graal fimds are appM for when a need is seen for such a facility. Hcssburg feds the need in the Westor^ area will fill this possible shelter and hopes communities will see the need to add other shdters in the western suburbs. • Westonka Intervention Project has been in existence for 11 years assisting over 500 victims. The project serves die Westonka area with the possibility of expanding into other western suburbs. The project is paid fi>r by fiindirig through a voucher system on a per-diembosis with the Departrnent of Corrections and Human Services. Money is provided throi^ the Blodc Grant Fund, which Orono contributes to. The project has a purchase agreement with the Conservative Baptist Conforence in the arnoum of $190,000. with $80,000 down payment and S110.000 on a contract-for-deed. A closing date of 12/1/514 is projected with an extension possible to 2/1/9S. The project has funds avdlable for the projected $164,000 in renovation. The applicant must bring the buttdhig up to the standard when it was vacated. Staff recommended potentially adding tins use as a conditional use in a residential or limited busness zone. Council members recommended bong able to control the use with restrictions. Callahan suggested tabling apfriication and estaMishing a committee to decide on how to proceed with this ^iplication. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetteu. to table action on the Westonka Imervention Project to enable a committee to be established to review the project and how it mi^ fit into the City's zoning code. Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Hurr asked the status of the police survey. Moorse reported an upcoming meetmg of three police oflficers and lumself to discuss issues of concern. This *is a follow-up of a previous meetii^ held with all police oflkers. Callahan reported receiving a call from an Orono resident upset at the amoum of roads closed during rush hour. Her attempt to drive to her residence was stopped at CoRd 6. Brown Road North, Willow and Old Crystal Road. Gerhardson reported a scheduUrig problem with Orono aiul Hennepin County. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24, 1994 (Mayor/Council Rqx>rt > Continued) HufT noted Watertown Road, goiqg up to Wittow. was full of debris this week and needed foDow up. ENGINEER REPORT City Ei^neer Cook had no comments for the Council. PAY REQUEST #1 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the p^mem for the Brown Road Reconstruction, Watertown Road Culvert, in the amoum of SIS.S36.40 to Buffalo Bituimnous. Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (*#11) NO PARKING ON BROWN ROAD NORTH - RESOLUTION #34SS Goetten moved, Jabbour sectMided, to adopt Resolution #3488 restricting parkii^ on Brown Rond North Grom Ifighway 12 to County Road 6. Ayes 4. Nays 0. (*#12) REVISED SUMP PUMP INSPECTION ORDINANCE #129,2ND SERIES Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the revised sump pump inspection ordmance #129,2nd Scries. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (•#13) ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL REQUEST - HENRY SKARP • RESOLUTION #3489 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3489 approving the reappUcation of special assessment deferment for Henry M. Skarp. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#14) PART-TIME OFFICERS - START DATE AND PERA RESOLUTIONS #3490 AND #3491 Hurr questioned and was informed that the City pays into FERA for all digible part-time employees. One ofthe two new officers is currently enrolled h PERA. When an employee, whether police or non-police, tranters to another employer, who also has PERA, the pension transfers also; or if employed by both, both pay into the fond. Tht.s resolution is to allow the City pension payments for these officers to be paid into the PERA Police and Fire Fund instead of the r^lar PERA fond. The two fomb have diffierent formulas that determine the share that the City and employee pay into their particular fond. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONOCTTY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24. 1994 (#14 - Part-Time Oflicen - Continued) Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the appointment of Neat Melton and Bill Persdl to positions as part-time police officers effiictive Novend>er 7. 1994, at a pay rate of $10.92/hour, and to adopt Resolutions #3490 and #3491 establishiiig their ett^bility for coverage in the PERA Police and Fire Fund. OTHER INFORMATION PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF LONG LAKE FOR ACCOUNTING SERVICES The City of Loiq Lake b considerii^ a proposal to contract with Orono for accounting services. Other possibifities are to lore an employee or contract with a private firm. Moorse request^ direction and parameters fiom the Council in conaid^ng this pn^)osal. Loitg Lake would like to recave a proposal to be presented at a meeting on November 11,1994. The City would need to recoup their costs including administrative ove4iead as wdl as bmldifig costs. Jabbour conmiented that working together with other cities is important but questioned at what point do we save or tip the scales in the other direction. Jabbour sad we needed to look at what we are after and where we are at in our cycle of needing a part-time or fiilt-time person. It would depend on the departmem and their amoum of free time to service thb accoum. Jabbour said we do nc^ to recoup our cost and some overhead but we need to answer these questions: Are we in the buaness of supplying to other dties. Do we expand and search out other cities. What is our dependence on other cities. Callahan is i^eeable to providing this service to the City of Long Lake, one positive factor of maiiy being thnr location. At this poini, Moorse said the City would potentially need to hire a part-time clerical person or an mtern to rdieve some of the ^ties within the finance department, but sees no need to hire a fiiU-time employee in order to provide this service. The hours involved will be mimmal and adrhtional hdp would only bt needed if the finance dqtartment were to develop an internal project that required addittonal help. The Council agreed to explore the proposal. 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24, IW4COMPLETION OF CITY FACILITIES Moorse presented the Council with a Facilities Budget/Expenditure Summary to close out the City finalities and budget A top priority is the mr exchange system to the Council Chambers. There is currently no method to exhaust the air or to bring in ftesh air resulting in the chaniber being overly warm whether winter or summer StafTis recommending the architect be directed to proceed with work to determine how best to ^AA air exchange unit to the existiiig furnace and provide a cost estimate. QiKMes would then be obtained from comraaors and b; *jught to the Council for approval. Goettcn questioned whether it was the responsibility of the architect originally to have solved this problem. Moorse said this was discussed in the early planning stages. The HV AC system n not large, so it had been determined not to include an air intake to keep costs down. The Council agreed that this problem needed to be solved Jabbour also asked the status of the police garage floor. Moorse said this was authorized to be done and is to be taken care of shortly. The contractor and architea were notified that this had not been completed. TH 12 CORRIDOR STUDY UPDATE LETTER Gerhardson out to Council members a ietter regarding the historical soaety and the environmental inq>aa review. The potential Hwy 12 land where the pump house is located will be walked by the historical society. They, as a routine, check for historical value and hand (hg to check for fiU. This will only be done after recoving written permissioa This letter grams that pemiissioo. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Barrett requested adjournment to Executive Session at 9:50 p.m. (•#15) LICENSES Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the septic system installer license for Duane's Septic Service. St. Michael, Mn 55376. Ayes 4, Nays 0. (•#I6)BILLS Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to af^rove payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 4, Nays 0. r 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm* COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 24. 1994 adjournment Callahan moved to adjouni the meeting of the Regular City Council to Executive Session at 9;50 p.m. ? \ Edward J. Callahan, Jr, Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; ITEM NO. % % Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assisi. Planning & Zoning Adminisiraior Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sect Zoning Item Description: #1895 Pat Wolfe, 2871 Casco Point Road - Variance Zoning District: LR-IC Single Family Lakeshote Residential, 1/2 acre. AppUcatkm: After-the-fact variances for construction of 10’xl2 ’ storage shed located 8’ from the shoreline, (arguably) 3.5 ’ from side lot line, and constituting 120 s.f. of hardcover in the 0- 75 ’ zone where no hardcover is allowed. List of Exhibits A - Planning Commission Minutes 10/17/94 D - Notice of Plannii^ Commission Action 10/18/94 C - Memo and Exhibits of 10/12/94 Discussion Please review the memo aixl exhibits of 10/12/94. Briefly, applicant constructed a 10’xl2* storage shed near the lakeshore, replacing a somewhat larger deteriorated shed in the same location. The construction was done without a permit, and in violation of code sections regarding hardcover, structure setback from shmeline, and the non-conforming use section. The an>licant requests to leave the shed as is in its current location, citing a number of reasons for the request in his letter of October lOth. Planning Commission Rec I] M I M -ndation Planning Commission reviewed this application at their October 17th meeting and on a vote of 7-0 recommended denial of the request, noting the lack of acceptable hardship or justification for granting of variances, and noting that alternate locations exist on the propeny where the structure could meet code requirements. Staff Recommendation Staff concurs with Planning Conunission that the variances should be denied based on lack of acceptable hardship or justification. Staff further recommends that the applicant be required to remove the structure to a location meeting code requirements. I J r Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 November 7, 1994 Zoning File #1895 _________ Applicant should be advised of the option of constructing a "lock box" (20 s.f. maximum area, 48 ” maximum height) in the same location to contain the existing pump and irrigation system controls. 1 sfor A t > I Conceptual denial, duecting staff to draft a denial resolution for final action on November 28th. 2. Table for additional information (specify). 3.Conceptual approval, directing staff to draft an approval resohiticm for your next meeting (specify hardships). Other. I 1 I 1 I r % •< 'U MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNUSSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER \ 7. 1994 (HI - ^1976->Gamblc- Continued)4^ Peter Achey of 47^?)>^yside voiced his concern with being able to sanity access the lots. Due to the lay of the iSi Achev fdt placing the two drive%vays log^ether would create a hazard, while the peak oftKbv(oad on Bayside would provid^Avhai he felt would be a good safe entry. 'V, ✓ Mabusth said th* County normally lik^Ho kee&drf'vew^y access away &om County roads However, in I'm case, the County would Wiccess lo be from Bayside Road rather than McCully. due to the high usage of Mc^iUy. far, Peterson noted a probltm wtth combining the driveways due to the.steep grade anih^^ a safe access will be a pnonty. . It was noted that a walkaway was shown for Lot I linking1t.to the Luce Line. Lindquist moved. Peter'son seconded, to approve the two-lot subtTivision application for Don Gamble at 46S0 Bayside Road to include the 8 Staff recoramendaBM^ted. along with the additional requirements of wood chips to be used on the walkway conneaing'Lot 1 to the Luce Line, and lot access subject to approval by Hennepin County and tho'C^ity of Orono. Ayes 7. Nays 0. ITEM W^^OIOVED FROJV^ (#3) #1895 PAT WOLFE, 2971 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:25-7:50 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Woife was present. Gaffion reported this application is for an after-the-fact variance for a shed located in the 0-75 ’ zone. The shed is lO’xi:*. requiring a building permit, is located 8’ from the shoreline, and constitutes 120 s f of hardcover. It is also 3.5' from the side lot Ime next to the public access and beach. The shed was replaced, rather than repaired, which according to the code cannot be done in the 0-75* zone making it non-conforming. The DNR recommended denial in a letter, later revising their recommendation that if the shed was placed 10' from shoreline, the applicant should go to the City for approval. Gaffron said there is a problem with the exact location of the property lot line. A Torrens action probably would be required to determine where the lot line is located. This result in the loisofbeach for the City The City recommends denial It should be noted that the neighbors have said the shed has improved in appearance h MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLAN'MNG CO.VLMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 (#3 - ^1895 . Wolfe - Continued) Mr. Wolfe commented that the City asked to install a drainage ditch six years ago which is 60-70’ from the shoreline. It buffers the shed though can be hazardous to children. Wolfe said the problem is security He feeis the easement creates problems with trespassing and theft, and the shed cases this problem. The shed houses the pump for his irrigation system and electricity for the area. Mr. Wolfe reported knowing he needed a building permit. He was of the opinion that the builder had acquired the permit and had placed a public notice sign on his lot. Wolfe later found out that no such permit was gotten, and the sign was probably stolen elsewhere Schroeder noted that the applicant should not have to incur malicious security problems suggesting a fence be erected in the area to help alleviate these problems. Schroeder reported that a neighbor had received a variance for such a fence. Nolan commented that security does not warrant a hardship in that security from intrusion is not solved by a shed. Nolan noted there are other areas where the shed could be located. Council members also said a lock box, which is about 4’x5’ and 4* high, would serve the needs for the electrical and pump. Peterson moved, Berg seconded, to deny Application #1895 tor an after-the-tact variance for construction of a shed for Pat Wolfe at 2871 Casco Point Road. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#4) #1959 JAMES W. OGLAND, 3345 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - AFTER-THE- FACT VARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:50-7:57 P.M. Cerrificaie of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Ogland was present. Gaffiron stated this application was tabled from the last meeting to devise a revision for the location of the shed. The shed is located on Dakota Rail right-of-way and built without a permit. Ogland has agreed to move the shed bringing it to the zero setback. 10' from the house which will preserve a large tree. Hardcover percentages need to be calculated. A lot coverage variance is technically needed but is less than the 1500 s.f. allowed. r CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Cfystal Bay* MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1895 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 10/18/94 TO: Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: type of APPLICATION:Variance VOTE:7 FOR 0 AGAINSTDATE OF MEETING: 10/17/94 Ptanning Cominissioii recommends the foUowing: Denial for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Lack of acceptable hardship or justifleation for granting of variances. 2. Alternate locations for strucnire meeting code requirements are available. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday. November 14, 1994; meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. . I i ■*2 r-To:Chairman Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members I'l Ron Moorse, City Administrator if'* fc'- ! Fnm:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning Sl Zoning Administrator IM r 1 Date:October 12, 1994 Subject:#1895 Pat Wolfe, 2871 Casco Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing iT* i.rz AppI trict: LR-IC, Sii^le Family Lakeshore Residemial, 1/2 Acre »: After-the-fact variances for construction of 10* x 12* storage shed located 8* from the shoreline, (arguably) 3.5* from side lot line, and constituting 120 s.f. of hardcover in the 0-75* zone where no hardcover is allowed. Note: This item was ubled at your September 19 meeting because the applicant was not present. Staff is advised he will be present at the O;tober 17 meeting. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - Letter from Applicant, 10/10/94 Utter from DNR, 9/27/94 Notice of Plaiming Commission Action. 9/22/94 Memo and Exhibits of 9/14/94 Discuss! Please review the above noted exhibits. While the DNR has recommended denial, the applicam has provided a letter detailing his hardships and background regarding the shed, as well as the location of this property next to a public access and beach area. The issue of the location of the property boundary is addressed in the memo of 9/14/94. Plaiming Commission ’s cations for action as detailed in that memo remain applicable. October 10,1994 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Assistaiit Plaoniiig and Zoning Administrator City ofOrono 2750 Kelly Parkway Oiono, MN SS356 Dear Mike: Thanks to you and Jean Mabusth fix all of the time you gave me last week. Please attach this letter to my lequest for an after the fact variance to rebuild the storage shed on our property. Due to the delays of having five diffieient surveys completed in the last year, thu application has been unduly delayed. While it is my understandii^ that not only Ruthie and I but also the city of Orono believe the shed is on our property, we understand your desire to get this before the Planning Commission. Therefore, consistent with your recommendation, we will move immediately to Torrens proceedings upon approval of our request As we discussed, the traffic on the easement and our dock has created a unique hardship we were not aware of when we purchased this property twelve years ago. While the shed would not have prevented all of the problems created by ^ easement we are confident it has eliminated many of them. Security for our possessions and our family has been a serious problem as police reports have fiequently validated. Throughout the trespassing, after hours traffic in our yard and on our dock, theft, and tueaking and entering we have continued to maintain the easemenL This has entailed everything from cleaning up broken bottles and beer cans to mowing, seeding, landsc aping, providing the City with fabric for its retaining wall and allowing the City to come onto and grade our property for a new dtaituige ditch. The easement makes our property unique beca use of the security problems it generates. Lossofthis shed would increase the hardship of our security problems. The property doesn't allow for relocation of the shed without significant expense but more importantly without loss of a significant level of security for us. Practically and financially hftrrf«hip€ would bc Created by lack of another suitable location on the property and the cost of moving pipes, pump, and electrical and irrigation systems that have been in this shed for an estimated twenty plus years. We need a secure structure at the lake for our possessions as well as for the 100 watt electrical box, pump, pipes and irrigation system. To relocate these systems would create a significant hardship of its own. ; * ^ ?' > ^ :We used the origiiial foundatkm which we shrunk from 12* x IS* u> KX x 12* in size. We believe the aheration in this structure cost less than 50% of the value of the structure in 1975. As evidenced by enclosed letters, the neighbors have been pleased by the downsizing, the appearance and the safety of the shed. Per your and Jean's recommendation and the recommendatkm of Ceil Strauss at the DNR, we will provide additional screening on the lake side to minimize the visual impact during all four seasons and to prevent erosion. Ruthie and I want to do whatever we can to work witiiin your system to keep this storage died in its existing location (m die old foundation. Please call me at 376-7050 (work) or 471-8220 (home) if I can be of any additional assistance. Sincerely, Pat and Ruthie Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata,MN 55391 r M PHONtNO. 772^79'>0 STATI or 0^ [1S <0> ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES METRO HATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 -- - - - - FH.ENO. B^CEiVED SEP 2 9 1994 CiT/ CF CHONOSeptember 27, 1994 Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Cryetal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE: LAND USE APPLICATIONS, CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Gaffron: I have comments on the following land use applications. #1895. Pat Wolfe. 2871 Caaeo Point Road (27-133-11). The applicant requests after-the-fact hardcover, average lakeshore setback and lake setback variances for the reconstruction of a shed. DNR Metro Waters recommends that the city dfiDY the variance requests as they are currently proposed. There are many alternate locations on the lot where the shed would be able to meet the city's setback requirements. We also question whether hardship exists. #1965- Gustafson Design on behalf of James Lear. 2525 Dunwoodv Avenue ^27-133-11. Soring Park BavK The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit and variance for grading and construction of retaining walls within the 0-75' lakeshore setback. We understand that there is an existing erosion problem and that a replacement wall of some type is required, we do not object to the city approving retaining wall work at this location as long as: the city engineer agrees that the design is structurally sound and will prevent erosion problems, disturbance of the existing trees and vegetation in the lakeshore area is minimized, and any shoreline riprapping is done in accordance with the rules of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the DNR conditions for not requiring a permit. #1968. Keith and Vivian Banoert. 3500 Bavside Road.—PIP Q5rll7~2.1 13 0Q15. ^27-133-23. Stubbs Bav>. The applicants request several variances for construction of a driveway and single family residence. DNR Metro Waters recommends that the city dsny the variance requests as they are currently proposed. In particular, we are concerned about the proposed driveway off of CR 84 (Bayside Road) which would require considerable grading and vegetation removal on a bluff. Further, it is our understanding that even if the proposed extensive alterations to the existing bluff were allowed, the applicants would still have a marginal access based on AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER s- Mr. N1X« Gaffron Saptaabar 27, 1994 Paga 2 ■V currant traffic aafaty standards. Wa racomaand that tha applicants axplora tha possibility of obtaining an aasament for an altarnata accass alignaant. It should ba notad for all tha abova varianca applications that tha courts hava said that tha applicant has a "haavy burdan of proof** to show that all tha praraquisitas to tha granting of a varianca ara satisfiad. This is bacausa a varianca allows proparty to ba usad in a aannar forbiddan by tha ordinanca. Tha Dapartaant should ba advisad of tha action taJcan on itana #1895 and #1968 within 10 days of final action and copias of tha official racord should ba forwardad to this offica if tha varianca raquasts ara not daniad. Plaasa contact mm at 772-7910 should you hava any quaations ragarding thasa conaants. Sincaraly, Gail Strauss Araa Hydrologist CCS/cds c: Laka Minnatonka files 27-133-11 and 27-133-23 J r CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1895 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 22. 1994 TO: Pal Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata. MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance (After-the-Fact) 0 AGAINSTDATE OF MEETING; 09/19/94 VOTE: 4 FOR Planning Commission recommends the following; Tabled for reasons noted below: Although J4>plicant had requested this be tabled until he met with Jeanne Mabusth, applicant did not contact Ms. Mabusth. Staff viewed this as an unwarranted delay and placed the application on the September 19th agenda. Application was tabl^ by Planning Commission since applicant was not present. I Please contact Jeanne Mabusth immediately to schedule a meeting. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission, Monday, October 17, 1994; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certiried copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. •'V i i 1 fi' t I To:Chaimuin Schrocder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:September 14, 1994 Subject: AppUcatl #1895 Pat Wolfe, 2871 Casco Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing ij Aftcr*the-fact variances for construction of a 10 ’ x 12 ’ storage shed located 8 from the shoreline, (arguably) 3.5’ from the side lot line, and constituting 120 s.f. of hardcover in the 0-75’ zone where no hardcover is allowed. Pertinent Code SectkMis/Variaiice Request 1.Section 10.22, Subd. 1 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C) - No structure is allowed less than 75* from shoreline. (Shed is 8’ from shoreline). 2.,^cnon 10.22, Subd. 5 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L) - No hardcover allowed in 0-75’ zone. (Shed constitutes 1204- s.f. of hardcover). 3.Section 10.55, Subd. 26 - Non-conforming uses. (A shed apparendy previously existing at this location was totally removed and replaced with the new shed. This action constituted strucniral repairs in an amount in excess of 50% of IhC vglW 9f OM ghcd at the time it became non-conformiiig. in approximately 1975 when code was adopted). UA of Exhibits J.O A B C D E F G H I Application Plat Map Property Owners’ List Letter of Request Letters from Neighbors Elsen and Iverson Surveys; 1) Otto & Associates - Received 7-8-94 Otto & Associates - Dated 4-13-94 Otto & Associates - Dated 8-22-84 Otto & Associates - Dated 3-1-84/10-25-83 Kelley & Kelley - Dated 2-1-57 Original Plat - Dated 8-1-1879 Hardcover Review by Staff (75-250’ zone) Sketch of Allowable Shed Locations Correspondence • Violation Notice 8-10-93 • Letters 8-12-93, 11-3-93, 1-26-94, 5-4-94, 6-6-94 Non-Conforming Use Section 10.55, Subd. 26 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 1 r Zoning File #1895 September 14, 1994 Page 2 Background The a^licant recently constructed a new 10’ x 12’ storage shed which was noted by the Inspections Department in August 1993. The prc^rty owner was advised that such a shed is not an allowed use and to leave it in its current location would require variances from the lakeshore setback and hardcover requirements. Mr. Wolfe has acknowledged that the shed is essentially a complete replacement of a shed that formerly existed in the same location. This is confimied by the letters from the neighboring property owners. However, such total replacement constitutes a violation of the non-conforming use section of the code, which is written with the clear intent that old structurally unsound buildings near the lakeshore should be removed rather than replace^*. (See Exhibit J). As can be seen from the various items of ctMnrespondence, suff has reiterated to the applicant dut this Structure is illegal and must be relocated to a legal location on the properQf, meeting setback and hardcover requirements. Adding to the problem b that the eastern boundary of the property is in question due to lack of detail in the original 1879 plat and due to a legal description that lacks detail. In fact, many surveys of the property have been done through the yean, and they are inconsistent. The most recent survey merely reflects sufTs interpretation of what the le^ description intended to describe, and which applicant’s surveyor felt had as much justification as any of the previous versions. Problematically, this most recent version, while placing the shed within appUcant’s property, results in a signifleant narrowing of the City’s beach right-of-way which could cause signifleant problems for continued use of the beach. Because of this issue, staff recommends that if Planning Commission finds justification to allow the shed to renuin as located, such approval should be conditioned on applicant completing a torrens or land registration action to reach a conclusion as to where the property line actually is. Statement of Hardsliip Please review applicant’s hardship statement on the application form and his letter of request. Given the relatively clear intent of the municipal code, is there any justification preseitted that supports the existing shed location? There arc other places on the property (see Exhibit H) in which a shed could be legally located. Existing hardcover as calculated by staff is 24.94% in the 75-250’ zone. There is likely a potential for minor hardcover removals to allow the shed to be relocated without a hardcover variance or with a very minor variance of less than 1 %. V.' St \ I /■n- . Zoning File #1893 September 14, 1994 Pige3 Optfons for Ai «> i I I 1. 2. 3. Recommend approval of setback, hardcover and non-conforming use variances to allow the existing structure to remain, conditioned on applicam completing a torrens or registration action. Recommend denial and recommend that applicam remove the offending stnicnire to a conforming location. Determine wheter hardcover variance in the 75-230* zone is apinropriate. Table for additional information, or until the lot line is legally established. (Such a procen could take many months; should shed remain in place during that time?) r. I cm GROW) - VAKIAMCB APPLICftnOM •.t ■r';:; A '"’^ ’ 3'■ =.-r^ rY^<^c ru Initial Application Faa $175.00 ($50.00 par aach additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change free original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After~the~Fact Fees (Double application fee) FROPmnnr intttiiAnoa Site Address ^8*7/ W. t t w** OFFICE A w* 0 0 C» VVM rrv t bto ! V U * 1 17^r m.. ■;-Lri ror_ 1 w.*i/v vr*H i •• '•C‘ ^ i A vA V f rnC wwa Mva / vw f ^ - />^/0 ST^7/ Property Zdentif. Number (P.I.D.)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Attach legal description to application if not included on required su: Date Property Acquired n/M^ (nonth/vear) I (do)(do not) also own rhe M^cent parcels of land. residentialPresent use of propertys Zoning District! other (sped f y) APPLICANT Name Address Phone (home) V 7/ - Phone (wor)c) CitV! Zip! (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (wor)c) Address!City!Zip! DBSCRIPTIOH OF K Estimated Construction Cost $/^X>0 Describe rf^yest in detail! ^g^ >3) A«»QnreS^ VARIANCES RBQUIRBD I Lot Area Setbac)c! ' •• Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lalceshore Other (specify) BARD8BIP/DBIP/DB8CRIPTZ0ILJ>1 II Describe undue hardi 2^^mi8UAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS hardship or practical difficulty and unusual [onditiona preventing compliano I • Ik ll ^11 f\ L pTo^rty with Zoning Code ir^uireme^S! A w i#j A. V 1 1 i i <• • j (attach additional sheets if necessary) lITThLS ition 3. 4. ' 3. 1 latat 1, CoBplsted Application Form . w-. j 2^-Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain ’- -Xiat from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 346-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required, (provide, one (1) copy SH-xll" for Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy ). SIcetches or ^ans of floor 4 elevation views (provide 1 copy 8ii xll ). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8._ _Mditional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. remember .that vonr veriemce amplication ie not complete _lf inPmmaticm has not been included* ____ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ APPLICAMT*8 SIGMATfM . . _ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all ^"^®”If^^*ir-/?21li^*ataff requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tiSe not covered by original fee payment) incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of higher Icnowledge. 6. 7.' Applicant's Signature Th. o.n.r h.r.by .ckovl.dgV. and agr... tp thi. applicatioB ^J^**^*J authorl... rMSonabl. antry ont. th. proparty by City ataff, aganta. Coi»ia.loi> meid>.r., and Council n«»b.r. for purpoM.-of inv.atiga tion and verification of Oimer's Signature ______oTftiif \JUe< Date Applicant nuat hav. allCtittala into th. )ity t{|* Pluming Cmmiaaion MaatA^ Plwming Comaia.ion Ma.ting. ar. hold t^ third Monday of aach month. Applicant, moat ^ “ff r..l«. iMOtiag. of th. PlauOng 00-1.100 mnd C^dl. If an unabl. to attend a achadulad naating. plaaaa **?hj>*«Miiainc & Zonlnuauthor!.*! pg«it attend in your place and to advia. the Building a Zoning Office'of this chcuige prior to the meeting. forrect to the best of Q J (i )J^ - ________________A.WJ Datm m, . / • : * a . • ^ "* ' t • • • #«e r F GOVT LOT 5 (■ ler : fill ■M Mit EPm coiMrrTUMivnu M-iir-n SI MM«/i/M «r nr mnMMTxoN svstiN OMCM LfsrSt M-U7-n SS MMtMM cMco pomr mr N RIMMf t tit LMN TOM lOMMn • OOOMI* LYONMM CMCO somr mNSmTA IM SSSU MPOIT NO. OMSSMl TMC 11M-117*» SI MMIMMII ISMMIONit MCMCnN WMlim UNO CITY or OMNO fMKt/ism or MID istmSt M-117-(S SI MCSM MtSt MMCM M t NRNIMtt t t_____nwMrm tom Ruimt s tttotM lvon m MM CMCO Tomr m MSmTA IM sssn St M-117-M SI ton tMM CMCO pomr mmvzATA IM inn St M-117-U SI tMM CMCO PO L t S K t tLtm mtllMCl t • RAT MM CASCO NDir N NAVZATA Ml itStlin:St tt-117«tS SI MIAMOTS CASCO pomr mJ P A K MLfl J PATUCR NOiri M7i CMCO pomr m MAVXATA Ml BtSTl St M-U7-M SI MB7 tMSi CASCO pomr m tOttHMT C IVftSIII tOMUMT SVItSON MSS CASCO Pomr m MAVZATA Ml SSS17 St M-117-tS SI MA7 tMM CASCO pomr m CNAtllS P NiLSON A MIPl CHAtlSf t UCV NHSON MM CASCO pomr m NAVZATA Ml SUn-? ' • i i* * =>:!v *'■ ■ ■» St tt-U7-tS St Mt7 tMM CASCO POO t 1 PSTmtON A N I tSVCS 1 PtmtON L NMT PAT PtrSMOMStep CASCO Pomr mNAVZATA Ml SSStt so M-117-CS SC Mtl tMM CASCO pomr i SAVSt J VOtRS A NiriNAVZATA NN SISn TOTAL OATCN tM MOll s urssss ssrs jsr-r " ~Mnwtolc « ^ HHQao » V. il. t' . k P [3;' VV .,wjJ I. ra«SMoi C II .1 /%i! 1^ i I i November 9. 1993 Mr. Lyle Omm Butldii« Official City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Dear Lyle: Please this letter to my application for a building permit and variance to rebuild the storage shed at my residence. As we discussed on the tel^hone. the builder I hired did not n^itain « tniiiding permit and rebuilt the storage shed on the foundation of my former storage shed. There has brn* a larger structure in this location for an estimated forty plus years and obviously we would like to keq> the smaller improved structure. I have had disc and tower back probtems for over ten years and die hauling between the house and lakeshore can be very debilitating for me. This shed is smaller and safer than the old structure which was a safety hazard and an attractive minr^ for our childien and other kids in the neighborhood. They ptoyed in and on the old structure which was just waiting for an accident. With the traffic day and night on the abutting public easement we also need this storage shed to secure our possessions. Our neighbon have been very pleased with the new structure as evidence by their enclosed letters. Ruthie and I want to do whatever we can to work within your system to keep this storage shed in its location on the old foundation. Please call me at work at 376-7050 or at home at 471-8220 if I can be of any additional assistance. Sincerely yours. Pat and Ruthie Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzau, MN 55391 S'/ - ... / November 9, 1993 City Of Orono r.o. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn; Orono City Council 6 Orono Planning Commission RE: The Patric Wolfe Residence 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 To Whom It May Concern: It is our understanding, some questions have come up regarding Mr. Wolfe's storage shed. We live next to the Wolfe's at 2879 Casco Point Road and are pleased to see the improvement. The improved shed, now in place, looks great and appears smaller than the previous shed. This structure is definitely an improvement in regards to safety. The last structure was old and appeared structurally unsound. We welcome the improvement and have no problem with it as it is. Yours truly. ’ence D. Elsen LDE:310 \ 5 November 9, 1993 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 To Whom This Concerns: I am writing this letter to you in regards to an improvement my next door neighbor made to his property at 2871 Casco Point Road. The Wolfes rebuilt a lakeside shed which replaced a deteriorating shed that was an eyesore and a hazard. The roof was rotting and sagged and the door wouldn't shut. Electrically it was unsafe. The new shed is less obtrusive and seems to be smaller in size. This is a pleasing improvement from my viewpoint as a neighbor. Sincerely, •u - Rosemary C.' Iversen 2835 Casco Point Road Wayzata; MN 55391 i: an Improvanant 2871 Casco acad a lazard. Tha In't shut. I sMllar in viawpoint as I- hl“ •■r- I'v in S g1 1 3 H -n\ 4? u.— \>z::f 5N < «••ao __n__ !,©1S'- [(■'' -5. m ■hh H rI'_j 1 »3 o# ^ i|a IIgl8 tttii tf 7»o >sX s • •!: •ooj Sr^Uia H ^ a a ® ^ •< •O »• ti I9al «irtc9»* n ~ll;tmil liin ■ 8 rt ■• S32?’? tliii •rc I !?rt • 5 *••na ^ i •••'i i'1 ,> i'h\ m ■1 'I V •«• Vi -:U .:v'. •4 ' • * • f I •'» m •• • ^ V II ^ >• . ' -i / /. JM £7’^'// ' ?/ P / / '/7c ?♦ !' >t ■ / • / -s;./ . i //*/ / ' l>f,r.;‘ • / ., > /.:.;'/* . • vY* . • :V- f i'fip"^ 3j‘pir.,<■*.iJriliMII < i jJ Hi? i%lli i Sii!i Iti* /\ ? -/Or\% • 1 f S tY o»*< 3 13 r“ 0 5 0 ? 2 5T r- ! SSH J 1 % 0 ^ •< Dr- iA U ASIsHI1 ?|f3 iH -• I 8*^ 0 iiwl d (*:;; 0 la 0 ■A r- ft i n a! A 1 1 __r___ m y n « 5' • •• if .-t *J O M .% 3 O A 3 C» « »• M 3 /» »j«0 O »« O — *« VI • Ana o -« *• 3 .1 <4 3 a fJ (^ >4 »'• 3 ft *• (A •• V 3 ' ft l»* X * * a r-o ) VI 1• o rt ♦ o .» u a vn * 1 -5S s: * • A •« •! A > ;r y» 5J £• O X rt » *• »1 • O Of TJ O ft Q or tr O3 3 I • J ta A I a ^ ft n 3 ^ o ff« A n lA ^ u ►* ): lA O 3 »% a n ,t y Z o •* t, a 5r » - Q a Cf ^ S 3 ^ > ‘Iuc•no T u . lA i. ^ i •' • <r. »t 3 . • •: O : 3•• -; (t fn inr» *3 ^ <? ft A Oc v n. ft »J *t 1.1 • AnC r f A 3 3 fr A PiM n 0 O ft r| A a j ft O 1 -O •> J w , ft . ». it f ft 3 • » *<k (« ;• *S ft •-• ..3 3 to i ►- »ft fto o •.. y -JiSo lA o » »•o 2 *** A o 3ft rt :: 3 Ac. Z <m in C to (tl •<o 3) U) A »- 6 Hcn o “«) u iS. 'a. T3 a^.^2 - s§ A *i » t> ft «) A 3a" A toa n o M O A C « ft 3 rt ^■5 »T» .. A i .. • • •♦ ■I U A O ft ••« *t O 13 I* ft A *• < II A 3 •t n 3 ft 3 ft •' It T3 O *t • ^ (3 tt n*„ »t **♦ * • ? '• s i? ^ 3 3 A ft O 3 X Su“a ,- to o f II 3 »>f «Q •-C It •I ft O *fk A ft •• O U 3 •1 t c X f. t m • f r* O ft X »«. A 3 3 - A to *1 T3 t- f »t •< 3 3 A M ►I ft A C •I Voum y • I •< & *- (jj j o 9^ •%' 0min nw 03 3 o^?a to I M •I » U ^A iJ a,. A - * A r ft M ^!5;- o • °1.3 a fv J < t 2"0 j; • [! fi too o *; A f *4 *: I’ • 2 :* ^;. ; i AAk ’li o ■» o 9 t-ov: o•n o 2 ft tt. •• :r to A «i t*»' *• OIt :t A r* ^ *• O 5A Itn o A ..13 ft ^ ft a in •II A 11 y O 11 n 11 V (I o ttk n _tLjOL ♦■I rf *•> O r* •! O :r CJ 3 O 11 • *1 n O • H H c X m :r # • *- »- y A M 3 • .j A a A * c »i ^ V tJ ^ L ^ ^ rn^ - r•j ^ o »>* n - CM »* •«, c ►, A ^ i' o y a 3 .1• n a ^. n »-* •» '» a tt •-a o•j ft q »« * *n o f» ^ tt0 • .t 5 («i : s * r ^ S, u •« , f • I* .’•••#»*•» /** '.. «• • • * . , ' *■*. •» • <•• »^, * • l . * 4 • « !| *.* JO .<". *^: r, *. ; 109 •!« * • • . V.u •o . • ' •. fej 'V-: ■ •■■■-: V v^' i 106 09 M s* ■• ’J-’.-t ■ -f.-US iJO plot too ITT IJOlO «>M«. 21 JO '----ZTL ----202 '‘1 .< 1 ^ •s ,% oi .1 3 ?«a 5.O 1 *. • » «a 00 •.-• ./ * , \ .# I •d * *• * '• 4|, »Sf\ *; * *• “f • I * •' ■ I * 11 » I I ^• ? rI • ? I-.- • ^ :• .1 40 xr.*;^'” . \'.'. rr.;1 <!>•>•. .•• . ■•• I; v; ■ vt jS;/S* l -I i f,• |: - <\I ^/ ; s - ;'^o .• I * r *•.. too* [}Carmon ro a »• i-'ii .. I • • • V 5 '^:; B I- U t4 m w 5S MS- f k r • I*;. ! * ■••:•* •.•■.v:' i—~. ' t .* —• yiv VI'I • 1 /*' .»* . n II |J a n o a 3fc 5 R 5 i K S P, H »-* CJ *• a Si o o < K O c •» a M* a K . 4 n p. h »♦ K p” a a n5‘inB SiJcrbs a o a* a % t* J • • a a »* A aa M :t a» o e'i ••:- r ^ 1 a kV ei a I r*l •j i: 1,^ 1M • • i».- "• 4. m.Ml; 5 \*.'7 ■■:. .‘. r v •i'*! I ‘ . • I .»• .» 'N 'L" ’li' •*i \. ^ ‘ *♦■ . ■ »» :r f i 1, ’ - 4 • I . J__J • t V, J J j v;.' * .............. I ; I j ;•m • .' • • y*' i l‘\ . • » :• roj i' .• Pircfl-m: i 1 •. • V -• i • '• '\V;'- :!.‘;=if Bp??;’ • ■■ \ ■•■ ■?:■ fe1 .* 5 • 1. • \- - • • .■1;'\-:. v; -1 ■■ 'fl:'!? R ii if m MOO If;..-.' t^V-' \i H u: %w ' t* »4r I •,1. ..t Lfi/li y\i- iV-V-i. ;l-.. '• \ ^ 1 •<. 1 i?.^ *J . 1 I . • . V'MfJl M • .: ‘iii:: ?l!|:; •V. k • • {••V V •>'.>^m;} i-: M. •. ! V* « • 7. -; J/ . •' *k . J.I r .*• *^**' ^ **^. ^ *».. . 4* ♦ • ; %^ A • •• . I ^ •*.kV |iR !•» >10 ‘^C 4 - IT :.• •' •', i; • ^ *1 J»•-»»#• • ♦ o ti • i i;.- k-* '4 r» O :r 1* t J U ^ <4 A I »•* • • U M k :i »-<^ ^ . M M > ^ 1 ? —.. J •• n ^ w- - «» rap U <4 t% A C/) Ik S .1 *1 • - *-• i -s« ik o .«.•>< J ^ M r« O C »i J . •* C k ; ;i .» ,1u t> »^ » • >« • u ,• n o • — » • tf •< .•> . - »: •» » 1 ► JJ 1 .J.» J »• 1 ( •k r» M H *1 »♦ '4 1 n•' V 7 rt o o > ;i • I ^•*53'k >»• ki*4Jn .T « l« J '! “ 1 s? • ^ »• O • k 'k <k . t* (». «k • , i« ••• > I O •■ M ••. M • L * » • • . X ^ M *; r, ^ H fi •. k fi o . '• * I • 3 »• r* »• -f » M r. I a r.» t- - fj . •• .7 * • •' fi * i i.. •< L’; •;., •' • -I •- » J <t « .1 ****** i "* *• •• I* fk ' su ? • fr < i* X 9 • • »- • r« J ;; ; -U I S §:;^5. _A______mk_ 4k 1 IUP i Wij iimMiurmBmmmm • t*% V J V—*'V!^ I • > , ^w^V- t ^ ' • • -.- V.* / .*4r'- •/ ^V?^'>''■ - •• , -- . . - . V, .. ■* - • • .* • • .. t - r>N^ • ..• >•.‘ p7 ^ / /■■/' ’/•'■'-/..^ i'.y y.»■•-"• i- f / -/ ■ -• • .»•<-■♦•--rt- • -' Jf / •%-•.*• . . r k .-I. ^ ,-'X • •' .. .-*r. • \A • •:"/« ‘V1^'.■ • V.:- y- •. -2'c,/ --v • . •>. • f '*»•! V \ M / C«rtiflcat* of Surveys . ,We hereby certify that this le a trae and-.correct plat of a at^ey v^^ • — ' 'k **• — -;t* \ - -• < r •• • t aurrey 'J^.\ -• k*' - -’>■-■ '■ ^iSSsjar.; Ub • S• Kelle Reg. No. ^ • r\ \v Of ^r}^r/ mmim IT 1 * r;. ^ , -*- > '^-r ;.■ ■ •!: 4-■ ■;1^ 1 .s7 • V • .' V •,T^m I ^ ^ * V ^ mmm » ._-> j'v -r ' •• ** ^ yv.>v h. :!SS,• ^»f»** A' >7=-*7^0 • .' ,— ^_ *■ '* - * • * .» .'• '.r**V .-•.« 'i ••■ .v-/.v^S^‘-/.•.•■ V-;- •: ./r # ✓ / ' *< /w/w .<! y /.-*■—«'*i / .\ *,• - .’. r' > ."i/ , : /: V,: V/::^t' tv y» • • • y ' •' /: VT' -V » EN&IKEU •->•'■ i A uwosticv€i0K^/'2^lr^ \f Of W\'A>V ,...........\ ' 1 •» i <»-i» V •• XSii .V » \ . .• - It #upT®yV.:-; rj^.\-:.:?:o-'-v ^ - \-- V 'oWiVl** -■.•4i^a^.^Yy-»<»^v' w+vi] !^- '^'*•1,5; -^\:\ -V •• i*i!j*V-‘ • ./•V •. ;■' 'r. w fe. • ’fe'^te;' ■' : k» . -t.. ■»*: . i r*.■I ' r»?nv;:y..Ac.; . “ v .'imfe* 'J.-; ii • -}W iHm '> t * ; v'v^’frv>.- ^'^T; m mw-^a- MP wt'Mii A... .-/-■* ^--;V (<s-- ^ ,1 Aw/' ■;>mm - -ii-"\ • I'rHr-<a ’''. ^■■:i i'll®t: I -4^.i i illff!:' # P® '- !*ji 1 ■•vVf-«ff%’ ■ p'ffiiF*- ■ 'M^' S'S«i® ^'; 'T? ix fflp'.' v^^it • i«wiBCS=:' ''^4' m. y ■ >>•>m- ^• . -.Sv ■ > i0m a^tr 'J- ;. /- fjM. 'i‘/7nt'.\s^s i4^vn.: piJ F ;' iil /\V . fc' - \ i*( v I'(les' Vf, / •♦?5-’{t^v>S:.^ r 4^ ^ AicfXi'Z .pi‘4 f-^i-iy (i-l £> , ..^f^st-' C*2 ^ SO lO >( 3 (S* *7 X i .r" . .._ ® .............. OA'^ (f) 2.3,3 x3</,</ (±^ i'l'’ zt>,Y _ _Sc/f fcA. © (/s-?'/e) r S’ 0 = , „.Wc< ® 2 C. y _ . . ® 2U XU i^. ..... €> X7 ^ lok^ (TT) 22 y/O’i-T- © V^X// 7 © /:T >^76. . (© ^zy'2.<^‘,Z. . (© 5V - 2^ ^ Bo x^/l -i 2. . ^./ >c^/’Mr ^y2*Y f/2fAr(f'^ ^ 2*Y20 . /SC.O ^O ....’2-H . ..J.y. A 81^ SH 0^ - ^o3- . ..I m ■? '<»''■ gv J ,//o 2S f I HO ?-?2- Hzp 170 /V5" rs j ?G0 7 o ./ 707 <: y~]oi-r ~ HOlC r 28;^7/- 2^,9^ %S 9 Av-b /O//^ - 7 i^^.'2.<S>^>1( r Z^,BC» ^ r : DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO inspection notice PERMIT NO called in SCHEDULED COMPtETED address OWNER _CONTR. Io TELEPHONE NO. description at FOOTING 02 FRAMING 03 INSULATION 04 WALL BD 05 FINAL or DEMO—SITE 07 DEMO—final 09 PLUMBING Rl 10 PLUMBING FINAL 11 MECHANICAL Rl 11 MECHANICAL FINAL 2A'25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 12 WATER HOOK UP 13 METER SETH-URN ON 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 23 SEPTIC FINAL 16 WELL TEST PUMP 18 EXCAVlGRADING/FILLING 19 lAKESHORE;WETLANDS 34 TREE REMOVAL ^^^>TE INSPECTION SePROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOLLOW-UP OWNEWCONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES NO COMMENTS ' Af>x. Lnrj:}^ L)c:^A.oj:^ oo I WORK SATISFACTORY: PROCEED C CORRECT WORK & PROCEED 3 CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR BElNSPECTlON ^ BEFORE COVERING Q CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN------ inspector will return ^ stop order posted CALL INSPECTOR ^ inspection required call to arrange ACCESS hours I project COMPLETE 7 ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY _____ temporary ___ PERMANENT 7 photo TAKEN - CITATION ISSUED Call lor the next Insp --ction 24 hours in advance. 473*7357 Owner/Contractoj;j^^ite: ------------^ Inspector. Whit. Copyfln.p.cloi'4 Fil* Canary CopyfSIta Nolle. I'1 ! CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices August 12, 1993 Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailint Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe: It has come to ^of tluc dipifWag^ ^1^71 Casco Point Road^^ that a storage shed has been built or placed on your piup-ii./ - ___^ . hardcover within 75’ of the lake. .e a. .us: re,u.e you .0 approved location or ^ ,? yj„ have any questions or if you have a problem“ £ £sr £.xr,™.™ Sincerely, G^Avvex — Lyle Oman Building Official LO/lsv cc: Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building and Zomng Administrator Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 1 CITY »f ORONO Municipal Officer* street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailint Address: P.O. Bo* 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-COoo November 3, 1993 Mr. Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe:Dear mr. wuut. 0„ Augus. .2. .993 OUs office shed placed on your „ apply for a building permit to place the shedrsr.--r “S'itS? .X’» ~™ questions, feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, P Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Budding & Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang. Field Inspector T.l.phon. («12) 473-7357 . FAX 473-0510 ’TT ! J \N January 26, 1994 CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: PO. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55322 C066 ! ! Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Wolfe: The City is in receipt of the Property Owners List and Plat Map as part of the required information needed to complete your after-the-fact variance application. As I noted earlier in a phone message, your application is incomplete as we have never received a survey locating all improvements and the subject boathouse on die survey. An earlier survey by Otto & Associates shows only residence structure and garage. No other improvements are recorded. If your application is to be complete, the City must have a survey locating all improvements including the boathouse structure and a hardcover inventory as stated and shown in the handout information (enclosed is another application form that includes handout inforrnation). The boathouse is considered a non-conforming structure as it is located within the 0-75’ setback. All non-coiibrming structures require approval of the City before strucmral repairs can be made. The deadline date for submittals for the February 22nd meeting (Tuesday) is January 28, 1994. Hopefully your surveyor will have completed the updated survey by the deadline. If not, the deadline foV the March 21st meeting of the Planning Commission would be February 25th. The City must be in receipt of a complete application by the March meeting of the Planning Commission. As we are dealing with an after-the-fact application, this matter must be resolved as soon as possible. Please contact my office if you have any questions penaining to the directives noted above or if you will have difficulty meeting the deadline of March meeting. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/lsv Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITY of ORONO Municipal OfTices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55322 C066 Mr. Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wavzata, Minnesota 55391 Rc: Zoning Application #1895 Dear Mr. Wolfe: I have completed a preliminary review of your after-the-fact application for variances to co^^i^ct a7accessory structure (10’xl2* shed) on your property. The certificate of survey by Otto Associates which you provided contains a wealth of information which leads me to ma e the following comments: • The survev is extremely misleading, showing a dark line boundary that does not match the legal boundary of your property. No addendum was provided by you or your surveyor to explain the format of this survey. • The shed is clearly not within your property boundaries, but within the right-of- wav of Carman Avenue. . The survev suegests a "nroDosed" change to your legal description which would place the shed"'approxin,...,-,> 4’ within your property. However you have not anplied for a vacation a portion of Carman Avenue, and if you did so. the City would undoubtedly deny such a vacation given the DNR's cons stent opposition to such proposals which reduce public access to lakes, and given the City s use of the right-of-way as a public beach area. . A site inspection reveals that the shed is approximately S^rom >he nomal Shoreline (not 12'-14’ as survey shows), and obviously within 75 of wtre no strSimres or hardcover are allowed. Your surveyor did not idetit.fy the 929.4’ elevation contour which is required by the City for all surveys abutting Lake Minnetonka. . The survey shows and site inspection verifies that your recent landscapmg has encroached onto the 60’ City right-of-way by as much as 20’. Telephone (612) 473-7.X57 • FAX 473-0510 Mr. Patrick Wolfe May 4, 1994 Page 2 • The fact that you had a boat house in the same location for many decades has little bearing on the City’s consideration of such structures. City codes are designed to eliminate such strucmres within rights-o^way or near the lakeshore as they deteriorate. Once the building was removed, it lost any "non-conlorming structure" status it may have had. • Further, the fact that you used an existing "foundation" (in this case a deteriorating slab) has little bearing, since per Section 10.55, Subdivision 26 (E). "If any non-conforming use is destroyed by any means including floods to an extent of 50% or more of its assessed value, it shall not be reconstructed c^^cept in conformity with the provisions of this section". Removal of the old shed constituted a removal of more than 50% oi its assessed value. All of the above leads Citv staff to conclude that you have not made and cannot make a legitimate variance application for ^is stnicture. A variance will not be granted for construction of an accessory building on the City right-of-way. The offendine structure must be removed immediately. The portion of your $175.00 Application fee*not used in legal notice publication will be returned. I suggest you re.ocate the stnicturs to a conforming site on the lot. Zonine Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and I would be happy to meet with you to discuss any o;7e*p"*U letter and a possible location on your property *at requirements for the shed. Please contact me or Jeanne as soon as possible 473-7357 arrange a meeting. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Enc. Sections 10.55, Subd. 26: 10.03. Subd. 5 cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm Lyle Oman, Building Official Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director i i i I CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 C066 Mr. Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata. .Minnesota 55391 Re: Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe: Pursuant to our discussion of May 31,1 understand you will not be providing the City with a revised survey showing your new storage shed as being within your property boundaries. Consequently, your after-the-fact variance application has not been scheduled for the June Planning Commission meeting. You indicate it is now your position that the storage shed is actually an "ice fishing house ’ which you intend to move out onto the ice each winter and store temporarily on the shore in the summer. I advised you I would review the City codes regarding the status of "fish houses". As a "shed", your building is considered as a permanent structure; as a "fish house", it is considered as a temporary structure. Both permanent and temporary structures are dealt with similarly in Section 10.55. Subd. 8 and Section 10._ ’ Subd. 2. Neither temporary nor permanent structures are allowed within 75’ of the lake nor encroachina past the average setback line. Neither you nor any other resident are allowed to store a "fish house" in the lakeshore yard not meeting the setback requirements. A temporary structure is considered hardcover, is an encroachment, and is regulated the same as a permanent structure. Your comment that many property owners on Casco Point have tish houses stored ne,xt to the lake has no bearing on your individual situation. Furthermore, our shoreline inspection tour of the Casco Point, West Arm, Forest Lake. North .Arm and Carman ’s Bay areas on June 2nd found no more than five 'fish houses" on appro.ximately 14 miles of shoreline. They simply are not being stored on the shoreline at the vast majority of lakeshore residences. The City’s position on your building has not changed and will not change no matter what you call it. Further, the City has no survey that shows this building is located or stored within your property boundaries. Absent such a survey, your after-the-fact variance request cannot proceed Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 (:*» u rnn^idered incomplete. Making a complete application for vanance and immediately proceeding with the process is the onlv option the City can allow you other than forcing removal of the offending building. r • this imtter be resolved in a timelv manner, you are hereby advised 7 Friday. June 24, 1994. in order .o meet .he to submit the Julv Planning Commission meeting. If no such survey is " p"rd *rvi.h legal aCion .o re<,uire removal of .he Structure. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Enc. Sections 10.22. Subd. 2 and 10.55, Subd. 8 cc; Bruce L. Vang. Field Inspector Lvle Oman. Building O .cial Jeanne A. .Mabusth. Building & Zoning Adm. Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator City Attorney r 5 10.21 ;! f ; H ii subd. 5. Area, Height, Lot width and Yard Requiret.ents. A -eight. No structure or building shall exceec V ^eet height except as proviaea rn2-1/2 storres or thir.-y ^eeu 'i Section 10.75. B. Lots. The following minimum requirements snail be observed: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard 10 feet Side Yard Adjacent to Street 15 feet Rear Yard 30 feet -4 1/2 acre 100 feet 30 feet SEC. 10.22. V eS^V eOT DISTRIC t'. ■LR-IC" AND or "LR-1C-1 One Within anv "LR-IA , LR lA 1 ' . . following regulations Family Lakeshore Residential District the .on shall apply: subd. 1. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The setback from the shoreline for lakeshore lots: A Shall be 75 feet for all structures except that on lakeshore r8°rnche ”l^ not in excess of 20 square feet reouires a buiicing allowed on the lakeshore portion or t..e lot ana permit from the City. B. NO principal or accessory be located within °.\-nce from the shoreline of existing lakeshore than the ave_ g . . (refer to Orono Manual of S®“"""llandirfs"Ind°Sprcirira"tions) Ixil'pt that this does not rAowld in subsection A abov^a.---------------------------- ■ ®“‘’'^■wi;hi4^^®®fee “ o/^“hTrelinrthere'^sL “rbe'nS ^^la“4atrg"*-fillins. t°h\s^rctron^ e.xcept as permitted under ^ shall be no oreater than 25%to 250 feet of the line there s^na^il ^be hardcover. within hardcover within 500 feet to 1,000 r?^^g:'^sreater than 35% hardcover. ORONO CC 283 (4-1-84) C w' § 10.55 including the ?f„; to 111 °thet provisions of this Areas, shall be between other provisions or this Chapter. Whenever conflicts occ ^ .^e nost restrictive Chapter and provisions or this provision shall prevail. r 1/-weari Protection Elevation. The Subd. 7. **®^“^?^°'^Aievation shall be an elevation noRegulatory Flood l^otect^on El^at on sh i°r5nfrease"s^ ir^looTIleTatlon caused by encroachments on the flood plain. The regulatory flood protection^el^^^^^^^^ the Floodway and l'l°°‘^/“'’1.iood Wat»r Surface ilevations “‘hhin adding 1.0 foot to the ^able contained i ' the Flood yioodway listed ^h ‘•jj® ■ - t^lood orotection elevat^ns between J^:s^”se;tirs“^s-hair^e^?^?e^poleted.- 3. The regulatory flood protection elevation ror lake Minnetonka shall be 932.5 MSL. C. The regulatory ‘2gi^te"ni%ro°fetsionil 00^1-^ Tn accordance w7th procedures set forth herein. -—-■ bereinafterrpecVfic^atirpS^^^ allowed within the . "^or"on"any land within 75 feeton anv lands witnin 26 feet tnereoL, j shoreline, nor on °? thi ordinary highwater «\a U such 'activity land abutting, ,®'^30iring or a . i nj-ompat ible with the policies upon those adjacent at ^rvation of those ff.o^areirfn ^hlir natural ---------------------------------------------------- ■-------- subd. 9. Floodway “rdo''not obs\®ruc°t'’ f lood"^flols! have a low flood damage P°tenti^al and d^ pioodway District to the "^r/nt^^haf ar/"'n^^r°pr;^i'b\''ted by -F ^ns^^ f ity Cod| provision and providea ^^ ^ .• ^ provisions or regulation of as Tiav be requirea by other C-ty uo . including without U%"e^ s^hfll ^ad^versely affect ORONO CC 365 (4-1-34) 5 iO . ^ I 5 \ Structure or tne us.c L before the passage or \ in conformity witn ^l/ inued subject v-he _____ _ . A or tbe use, Mnn—r*onrorminci Uses.Suba. -0. befor’=> the cassage o O, a St.uctar. or P--|f,“ri^n''oV^ - ^rjfufo'ns O^'this Section .ay be cont following conditions: r,. KO such use shall be expanded, chanced, en atgec or altered in a way which increases rts non-con£or.,./. ^ 3. NO structural alteration^or^addi.ion^to^^^y^^ confor.inc^ructare of it's becoming a non-conforming percent of its value at ^^eJ:ime changed to a conforming use, .^aitlration or' addition would substantially re uce pSLnti^af flSod'i-a^^s for the entire structure. c. Any alteration J“°g3s°ng" i ts° £ lood damage “sh\^ll^- subdivision 14. Subp'aragraph B of this Section. 0. If such use ^^^^'■pi^iug^semises shall consecutive months, any £'^‘“',,Vassos'sor shall notify the Zoning conform to this Section. non-conforming uses wnich ^^:i\^%^”d^U^o\\r^jed^r\terrod of twelve months. E. If any "°"-”"'°„^,"^J’jS"o'terLnroV°m«"e o'f i"ts „eans, “/S„%\%natructed =°"if,ue aassessed value, it shall . How<=»ver, the City may issue a with the provisions J^"^^^®;^onstruction if the use conditional use / uoon the reconstruction, is adequately outside the floodway and, “P°" o.otected in conformity wi.h flood proofed, elevated or otherwise . tnis uec-ion. uhich ar® or become -• “ = °%ll^"?rion?"nue as nonlconforming uses. nuisances shall not be entitled to g. Except, as provided ^i^n^ “ff fufe” sL^l^ -t be use which has been considered as a non-conforming use. ^ ,,oodway H. Non-conforming conformity with the District shall be ^liminated or^ojough^^_^ ^ reasonable standards contained i. this o after a hearing for each sucn time as determined by the determination upon th-Conforming use. The Council ahaU make ^i^t. improvement upon the Tdart\o “n!^ t^h^e -netary value o a^^ kL^ntaW derived ,\V ^ ^VaTlis^menf of competing businesses reason of the limitation on ^sca (4-1-84) ORONO CC 375 r -esult of this Section, shall be considered resulting from the requirer'.ent of rerm: ^ V • - - nsidereo as a reductron o- raination of the use A Subd. 27. Anendnents. The flood plain desionation on official maos shall not be renoved froai r lood plain a ecs unless it can be shown that the designation is in error hho area is at or above the elevation of tne regional ^^ooc a., ush.o adontYon Changes in the official maps also r.qutre prxor approval by the Federal Insurance Administration. Subd. 28. Interpretation. In their aoplication, the = Yb^Mber^^^°"cln^.rued in favor of minimum "Y the City and shall not be deemea boundaries of the Other powers granted by State . . ^ scaling distances on Flood Plain Districts shall be to the exact the official maps. Where in tuQ^dis^rict as shown on the official location of the boundaries of ^o be a conflict between a maps, as for example where ther the City Engineer mapped boundary and actua ^^^o^^tion based cn elevations on the shall make the The oerson contesting the regional (100-year) ^ ^ uj i ? H given a reasonable location of the and \o submit technical opportunity to present his case to uhe t y evidence if he so desires. subd. 29. Abrogation and not intendfd by this Section to covenants or deed existing ordinance, Section imposes greater restrictions. However, sl^^ prevail,restrictions, the provisions of this Section snaii p * nni<?r*la.iri03r of Lis-bility* This Subd. 30. warning and flood plain districts Section does not imply that areas ou will be free from or land uses permitted noYY liability flooding or flood damages. Ji’J' employee thereof for any Tlo^o^d XaYaYfs t-t=Y^su^^.^?^/m“rjr£e Section or any administrative decision lawfully ma Source: Ordinance Mo. 21- Effective Date: 1-11-79 ORCNO CC 376 (4-1-84) IJ li i; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION X DATE: Noveiflil^ ITEM NO.: 4/ 7o V., % Department Approval: Name .Michael P. Gaffron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Adnunisirator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description! #1967 Robert S. Olson/Irvin T. Geffre/K-P Properties, Inc., 4645/4665 Bayside Road - Final Subdivision Approval - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Copy of Final Plat Drawing C - Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution No. 3483 The applicants have completed all requirements for final plat approval, including. • Dedication of appropriate "drainage and utility easements" (while a drainage easement is shown over the wetland in Outlot C. no conser\ ation and tlowage easement will be required until Outlot C is developed). • Granted the required road and utility easements over Outlots B and D. • Provided evidence of driveway easement over Outlot B in favor of proposed Lot 1. Block 1. • Paid the appropriate fees. • Provided the appropriate title opinion and documents. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends final plat approval per the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Proposed Motion: Moved by ___. seconded by____, to adopt Resolution No. — granting final plat approval for the plat of Bayview Farms Second Addition tor Roben S. Olson. Irvin Geffre and K-P Properties. Inc. at 4645-4665 Bayside Road. Vote: -----ayes. -------- nays. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF BAYVIEW FARMS SECOND ADDITION - FILE NO. 1967 WHEREAS, the City of Orono Is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Robert S. Olson of 4645 Bayside Road, Irvin T. Geffre of 4665 Bayside Road, and K*P Properties, Inc. represented by Donald R. Peterson (hereinafter the subdividers ), and WHEREAS, on October 24, 1994, the City Council approved Resolution No. 3483 granting preliminary approval for a plat at 4645/4665 Bayside Road; and WHEREAS, the property is located within the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot; and WHEREAS, the property contains a total of approximately 19.5 acres, of which approximately 1.1 acres has been delineated as wetland, and WHEREAS, the proposed plat contains two lots (designated as proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot I, Block 2), oach containing an existing residence strucmre, proposed Lot 1, Block 1 being 2.75 acres in area, and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 being 1.94 acres area. Proposed Lot 1 . Block 2 technically requires a lot area variance, but will retain ownership ot an addnional 0.07 acre ouilot and may gain up to an additional 0.28 acres as noted below, m orde; to meet the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement; and WHEREAS, the septic system serving the residence on proposed Lot 1. Block 1 is failing and is intended to be replaced. On-site sewage treatment system site evaluation daw indicates that pnmar>' and alternate drainfield sites for current and f\iture use are available within proposed Lot 1 . Block 1 . No septic testing is required for the existing residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 2 since it is a pre-existing lot; and Page 1 of 6 WHEREAS, in addition to proposed Lot 1. Block 1 and proposed Lot 1. Block 2, four outlets are proposed to be created with the following intent for each; Outlet A: 0.28 acre remainder parcel to be combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 2, at such time that Outlets B and D are used for private driveway or road access to Outlet C. Outlet B: 0.32 acre 50 ’ fumre road corridor providi^j access for future development of Outlet C. In the event that Outlet C is further developed using road access from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlets B and D, Outlets A and B will be legally combined with proposed Lot 1. Block 1. Outlet C: 14.13 acre parcel intended for future development into single family residential lots. Outlet C is intended to not be buildable for even a single residence unless or until it is further subdivided and/or replatted into one or more building sites. Outlet D: 0.07 acre future road corridor segment to complete continuous access in conjunction with Outlet B for future development ot Outlet C. In the event that Outlet C is further developed using road accesses from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlets B and D, Outlet D will be legally combined with the proposed Lot I, Block 2. WHEREAS, Outlets B and D provide continuous access to Outlet C from Bayside Road. The platting of Outlet D coincides with an existing access easement over Lot 1. Block 1. Bayview Farms'in favor of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms. The inclusion of Lot 1. Block 1. Bayview Farms in this proposed plat is the subject of an agreement attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. which details the applicants’ intent regarding the future use and disposition of Outlets A. B and D; and WHEREAS, it is the City’s intent that if Outlets B and D are developed tor future road to serve Outlet C, then the existing residences on proposed Lot 1. Block I and proposed Lot 1. Block 2 shall construct driveway accesses onto said new road and eliminate the existing direct driveway accesses to Bayside Road; and Page 2 of 6 i ! i ; < WHEREAS, it is the City’s intent that in the event Outlets B and D are used in the future for road purposes that such road shall be consiiiicted to City standards. Further, it is the City’s intent that in order to guarantee the future access to Outlet C. applicants shall provide to the City standard road and utility easements over Outlets B and D. It is the City’s further intent that if Outlet C is developed without the need for access via Outlets B and D. that such road and utility easements will be vacated upon formal request of the property owners: and WHEREAS, it is the City’s intent that Outlets A, B and C shall remain in private common ownership until Outlet C is further developed, and that Outlet D shall remain in private common ownership with proposed Lot 1. Block 2 until Outlet C is further developed; and WHEREAS, it is the City’s intent that at the time Outlet C is further developed, the City will at that time require the payment of park dedication fees and the dedication of any additional necessary and appropriate public easements within Outlets A, B. C and D: and WHEREAS, it is the City’s ir lent that proposed Lot 1. Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 crant the standard perimeter utility and drainage easements based on the assumption that Outlets B and D will in the future become a roadway; and WHEREAS, although Hennepin County Department of Public Works has requested additional right-of-way for County Road 84, no additional County roac right-of-way will be required of the developer consistent with the standards for a collector road as defined in the Orono Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, a driveway easement over Outlot B shall be granted in favor of proposed Lot 1, Block 1 for the existing driveway in Outlot B; and WHEREAS, the existing accessory metal shed located at the northwest comer of Outlo. will become non-conforming upon final plat approval due to lack of a principal resist;nee structure and must be removed within one year of final plat approval unless it is incorporated into a subdivision of Outlot C into buildable lots and made conforming at that time. an,. WHEREAS, the single family residences existing on proposed Lot 1 . Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 require no further variances; and Pace 3 of b r ‘ I I WHEREAS* the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Comp'etion of the requirements of Resolution No. 3483. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. 3. Granting of road and utility easements over Outlots B and D. 4.Granting of a driveway easement over Outlot B in favor of proposed Lot 1. Block 1. 5. Payment to the City of legal review and filing fees of $200.00. NOW* THEREFORE* BE IT RESOLVED* that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Bay view Farms Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. Outlots A, B and C shall remain in conunon ownership until Outlot C is further developed. Outlot D shall remain in ownership with proposed Lot 1, Block 2 until Outlot C is further developed. Outlot A is considered an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon development of Outlot C, Outlot A shall be either combined with Outlot B and proposed Lot 1, Block 1 if Outlots B and D are QQ{ used for road purposes, o£ Outlot A shall be legally combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 2, in the event that Outlots B and D are used for roadway purposes. Outlots B ii?«l D are platted for future roadway purposes and shall remain as separate unbuildable tax parcels in private ownership until such time that Outlot C is further developed. In the event that Outlot C is further developed without a need for use of Outlots B and D as roadway access, then Outlots B and D niusi be legally combined with adjacent properties. Outlot C is created for future development only, and no building permits shall be Issued for Outlot C until such tir.e that it is replatted into one or more buildable lots. Page 4 of 6 ----- I / 'if 5.In the event that Outlets B and D are used as an access road serving a future development in Outlet C, the residences on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 shall revise their driveway locations onto said Outlet roadway and eliminate direct access to Bayside Road. 6.No additional right-of-way for County Road 84 will be granted although Hennepin County has requested it. 7.Payment of park dedication fees and the dedication of additional public easements within Outlets A, B, C and D will not be required until Outlet C is further developed. 8.The residence on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 shall be provided with a new septic system within the time frame and requirements of the City code. 9.The metal shed located at the northwest comer of Outlot C shall be removed within one year of final plat approval unless a complete formal application for subdivision of Outlot C has been submitted by that date. 10. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office on or before May 14, 1995 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easement documents noted above. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Page 5 of 6 • »I ^ ^ • ..r -fT. 5t-?- ■« i ;"• . b ; t-l- ■\ <fe r. I - •:. r ■■t: % f'. •>i Dated this 14th day of November, 1994. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of November, 1994, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalfCity of Orono of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 6 ‘Tit rf < r.- T CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE Cm* COUNCIL NO. 8 4 8 5 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 4645/4665 BAYSIDE ROAD - FILE NO. 1967 WHEREAS, Robert S. Olson of 4645 Bayside Road. Irvin Geffre of 4665 Bayside Road and K-P Properties Inc. represented by Donald R. Peterson on August 26. 1994, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a residential plat of properly legally described as: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Bayview Farms. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 1994. at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants subsequently revised their proposal which was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting of October 17, 1994, at which lime Planning Commission on a vote of 7 to 0 recommended approval of the revised proposal; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on October 24, 1994, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Robert S. Olson, Irvin Goffrc and K-P Properties Inc., noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of approximately 19.5 acres, of which approximately 1.1 acres has been delineated as wetland. Page I of 6 • I* \r I i.a i CITY of ORONO if d: RESOLUTION OF THE Cm' COUNCIL NO. ^ ^ 8 3_____ \ r V’ 3. 5. The proposed plat contains two lots (designated as proposed Lot I, Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2), each containing an existing residence structure, nroDOsed Lot 1, Block 1 being 2.75 acres in area, and proposed Lot 1, Block . Line 1.94 acres in area. Proposed Lot 1. Block 2 technically requires a lot area variance but will retain ownership of an additional 0.07 acre outlet and may gam up to an additional 0.28 acres as noted below, in order to meet the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement. available within proposed Lot I, Block 1. No septic testing is requited for the existing residence on proposed Lot I. Block 2 since it is a pre-exis mg in addition to proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and pro[»sed l^t I, Block 2. four outlots are proposed to be created with the following intent for each. (a) Outlot A; 0.28 acre remainder parcel to be combined with proposed Lot ’ 1, Block 2. at such time that Outlou B and D are used for private driveway or road access to Outlot C. Outlot B- 0 32 acre 50' future road corridor providing access for went of Outlot C. In the event that Outlot C is mnher deve oj^ using road access from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Out o B and D. Outlots A and B will be legally combined with proposed Loi 1, Block 1. into one or more building sites. ?. r—- be legally combined with the proposed Lot 1. Block Z. Page 2 of 6 1- ,TKr*-T-..r'— r CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CnY' COUNCIL NO. ^ - S -S 8 9. 12. sssiiislii agreement attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. which details tte applicants intent regarding the funire use and disposition of Outlets A, B and D. It is the City's intent that if Outlots B and D are ^XkTiiiJd “"A^d11:d,^ATa?Xs onto «id new road and AiSnate the existing direct driveway accesses to Bayside Road. II is the City's intent that in the event Outlots B and D ate used in the ftitute for "The^“cT:^^“r" T gT" Sr"to olTc. Tut aA"Tt1: tA aty";vrttent “olVcTrelo^ wtut UreTeS' fo AA v'll Uts B and D. that such road and utility r«^n “will be vacated upon formal request of the property owners. It is the City's intent that Outlots A. B and C shall remain in comn.on ““'“"hip ownership with proposed Lot 1. diock unui It is the City's intent that at °“TedteAoTfeS a^'toAtotiATuil at that time require the payment of park nnfinf« ABC and Dnecessary and appropriate public easements within Outlots A. B. C and o. u is the City's intent that proposed ,1.1 ‘ Vaee'^eaXmt Tased “oTme !s"AAn" loTTand dTh in"he fumre become a roadway. Although Hennepin County ■^r"“l1iTnTATntTroTd right-of-way for County Road 84. no ^T^fm a Allector road in the required of the developer consistent with the sundards tor Orono Comprehensive Plan. Page 3 of 6 ! K ■ ■ 11 U CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL NO. 3 4 B <i // 13. A driveway easement over Ouilot B shall be granted in favor of proposed Lot 1, Block 1 for the existing driveway in Outlot B. 14. The single family residences existing on proposed Lot 1. Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 require no further variances. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the".■r.r.rir s Surveys Company Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. until Jutlot C is further developed. 2.Ouilot A is considered an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon developmen of Outlot C Outlot A shall be either combined with Outlot B and proposed Lot I. Block 1 if Outlois B and D are qsI used for road purposes, or Outlet A shall be legally combined with proposed Lot 1, Block m inc cvem uwi D are used for roadway purposes. Outlets B and D are platted for future roadway t revem c" — a for use of Outlets B and D as roadway access, then Outlets B an ----- combined with adjacent properties. lots. 5.,n the event that Outlets B and D are used as an access development in Outlot C, the residences on Outlot roadway and Lot 1. Block 2 shall revise their driveway locations onto said Uuiiot eliminate direct access to Bayside Road. Page 4 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE Cm' COUNCIL NO. ^ 4 ^ yy______ • ..I ^v,r 6.A driveway easement over Outlol B shall be granted in favor of proposed Lot 1, Block I for continued use of the existing driveway in Outlot B. 7.Proposed Lot 1. Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 are subject to the standard perimeter drainage and utility easements. 8.No additional right-of-way for County Road 84 will be granted although Hennepin County has requested it. 9. Outlot C is further developed. 10.The residence on proposed Lot 1. Block I shall be provided with a new septic system within the time frame and requirements of the City code. 11.The metal shed located at the northwest corner of Outlot C shall be removed within one year of final plat approval unless a complete formal application for subdivision of Outlot C has been submitted by that date. weeks prior the month: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two p“r r!griy scheduled Council n«e.ing on .he second and fourth Mondays of 1.Record plat drawings in Ute form of two (2) mylar copies and one (I) copy reduced to 1" » 200 ’. Drawing to include: Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Surveys Company Inc. dated August 25. revise B Dedication of 'drainage at^ utility onTatea^ LtlVrwirs^~■y«5- in width along the southwesterly and southerly lot tires a ^ i„°rlh ‘ioflteV5Mn''v'^dn^^^^ Ui^"eas.erly boundary. 10' in :tdVl"b!X5;D -d, Outlot D. and 5 ’ in widU, along Ute southerly lot lines. Page 5 of 6 ■ - V //o o\CITY of ORONO \ RESOLLTION OF THE CITi' COUNCIL NO. 8 4 d--------- 2. Legal documents required: A Title ooinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage ho'ders or others with property interest indicated therein shall Mgn the plat and Other documents affected by such interest. B The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property C.Signed and eaecuted driveway easement over Outlot D in favor of proposed Lot 1. Block 1 D.Signed and executed road and utility agreements over Outlots B and D. 3.Fees to be paid: A. Legal review and filing fees = $200.00 Total due: S200.0Q Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held October 24. 1994. / wothy M. iWlin, City Clerk Edward J. CallaM. Jr.. Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) \) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ,.v.„„wled£ed before me on this 24th day of October. IP^Ty S"? City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporatio of the City. Ivj Notary Public Page 6 of 6 '.WR “ .:/v ‘ • -.-nr-' ; I BXHISIT A agreement Robert S. Olsoo ind Margaret W. Olson, fee owners of Lot 2. Blo^k 1. Bayview _ ii IT P Prooeriies Inc., contract purchaser of said lot. hereby agree S«”in the etent tbaf portion of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms shown a ..utlot c o. Ihe .l«cb«J Exhibil A i> tepUlled “Mri «r.Xd Extrbi.'x u.-. a^.-. »an..d which IS . J Marjorie L. Geffre that p„d.. b«.by „ Ouuo. A o. ..uebed Exbibi. of Loi 2. ^ ^ boundod by a line described „“ollo*..r Be,ionin* .1 tbe Noribwesiesly b.I;; 'r* l't"d*TL Ibti^e S 00 45- OO- E disia^e ^ .tLee S 89 45‘ 00* W distance 148.50 feel, tbence Nonberly alonj .be wesl“u;.e of U. 2. Block 1. Bay.ie. Fanns to dte point of bejinnin, «td there terminating. 'rr' s Signed Robert S. Olsoo Margaret y. Olson Fee owners of Lot 2. Block 1 Bayview Farms K-P Properties. Inc. Contract purchaser of Lot 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms aj.. ■'y president ^Donald R. Peterson Irvin T. Geffre Marjorie L. ^ /CenT----- P / Fee owners of Lot 1. Block 1 Bayview Farms, their heirs and ssigns 1 PRELIMIMAPY RAI OFBAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITIONCITY OF OROMO. COUMIV OF ITENNEPIN• .I . i j- ' >•A:>Aij! ■.’•iT' ) fei K*# W- : - c*» \ : /• •/ “W^•» i.-' • .:\v^:* .------V \\ V\ - V • y \ ..oA-.- .:a \\p\\ [\ ■• • ••:. .)..'rnm \ \N *. \MYvi'lvIVF' H 'AV. \^W | \\l |\'A. . ' •■■ ' • ■•'\ 'A-' '. \1 \ M\-\'A A«vft.^vw I’ ' ^ » V . •- 4 'K . LOT SURVEYS CO. LAfiu SURVEYO kSiMI • 9 l<Ml|«H «;*• •«•r« «%««! 9%am^ •lA tmX«S \I>^9• »»•#«« %,«*| i%»*«** • !••W» IJr4 •- • V»Mi(a r ••• *a %' * .*w««ca^% % ••••»*•* ••Mft •«,t>ar •*••let I ti.i* I •*»»%!• ll •>*■»«!«•*• I tm* *w #«#•# <M4% ••t«*ai •tmm. mIM I. Ilwt I. BMtll* «••«% (•aMf •l.aMutVia. *••• •«•«»«•• •• #»««>«!•••< «>M If t *«••« 1*^ >■—aa» i*H I id I. tM I i 9% ••••• I Oa«<*i • • *«•••• • • it *•••«• 4d«id« •*•-* td *. •<* t * ** • • ••• «»• • I * ••«• •It «i»«d««» ••• •pr*******' ••• *'*••• i« »a»»at •• «•••( •»•« I ^1 f»iaf »••• <••* •* • a#* 9m04*9 ■ a**( |••tl•r• td^ ■ U»M« TYPICAL LOr O o ft r i»Lw, I 9^.mvI»***^**^ T T ,* •••«!■• tad I X------ I «•« • «•#•••(!••• • !••• mt «»• .J\ •»*••# ••• I »•>••• a • • •d^M lan* ROAD '.a ..‘ ^ ' ■ A'AA'‘._ . . ■A'.ii 7] arg»(ff».y ..*,T?»; »t-» »'.r.r.f ;• 5 : > ?^V . ■>«/r V:^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION >• ^S9*l ^ :-ni DATE: November 8,m•0 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffiron Thk Asm. Planning & Zoning Administraior Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1969 City of Orono, 1355 Brown Road South - ^ iriance - Resolution y^ing District: RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential, 2 acre. Application: Request for front yard setback variance for construction of a parking lot to serve the Crystal Bay Post Office. List of Exhibits A - Resolution . ,/v/. B - Notice of Planning Commission Recommendation 10/18/94 C - Memo and Exhibits of 10/12/94 Discussion eliminate parking on the shoulder. defined front yard. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission reviewed this at their October 17th meeting and voted 7.0 for “PProv^ Staff Recommendation Suff recommends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation. A resolution for adoption is attached. '6 i t .*• A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.61, SUBDIVISION 5 (A) FILE #1969 i It > 4 K'! WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1355 Brown Road South within the corporate boundaries of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Markville, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit the construction of a parking lot to be located within the 50’ required front yard where open parking spaces are normally not allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1969. The property is located in the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 17, 19^, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A. The Crystal Bay Post Office was constructed in 1960 and acquired by the City around 1980. It is intended to continue in use as a post office for the foreseeable future. Page 1 of 5 "i ■siV h 5. B E. The post office has never had a formal parking lot and a fom.al parking lot with a drive through letter drop will eliminate the current panem of parking on the shoulder of Brown Road. A parking lot meeting the requirement for being outside the SO ’ required front yard would encroach into the existing Crystal Bay park and playground area. An ingress/egress driveway would have to cross the front yard in order to reach such a parking lot. Construction and use of a parking lot meeting the front setback requirement would have a severe negative impact on the existing use and layout of the Crysul Bay park and playground area and further would require additional hardcover. There is existing screening to the south side of the parking lot which is appropriate as a buffer to the neighboring residence to the south. Construction of the parking lot will allow elimination of parking on the shoulder of Brown Road, resulting in a safer situation for post office customers. Placement of the parking lot in a conforming location to the rear of the post office would likely result in continued unsafe parking on the shoulder of Brown Road. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property sw peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with tlw spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 .4.. ... ■V; i CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance 10 Munkipal Zoning Code Section 10.61. Subdivision 5 (A) to peimit the constniction of a parking lot to be located in the retpiired front yard where a parking lot is notmally not allowed in the RR-IB District, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Parking lot shall generally adhere to the design and site plan attached as a Exhibit A. 2. The parking lot shall be striped for proper traffic flow. 3. The existing informal gravel parking area on the north side of the building shall be reverted to grass. 4 Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applic^t, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 14, 1995). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of tWs resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6 The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of itself, its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of tiie property. 4 Page 3 of 5 . ‘V Ev- t-’* Adopted by ihc Oiono City Council on this 14th day of November, 1994 ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cleric Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor 6v • Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of November, 1994, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 p V i I- > ■ • - >■ hI *>g-_ CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 m-7351 ZONING FILE #1%9 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 10/18/94 TO: John R. Gerhardson COPIES TO:Ron Moorse TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance DATE OF MEETING: 10/17/94 VOTE:7 FOR 0 AGAINST Ptanning O 11 i .P !- % I 11 ds the following: Approval as submitted per staff memo. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant ’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday, November 14, 1994; meeting starts at 7:30 p.m If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, ^y arc available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission." I I' i ! V t '■V t ^ i i' I »( 'm. : \ ' ■ i TO: * i j FROM: . i DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator October 12, 1994 of Public Hearing SUming District: RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential, 2 acre. AppUcation: Request for front yard setback variance for construction of a parking lot to serve the Crystal Bay Post Office. List of Exhibits A > Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D > Survey/Site Plan E - Hardcover Calculations F - Letter from Hennepin County Public Works 9/16/94 G > Staff Memo of 9/12/94 H - Memo of 8/18/94 I - Pertinent Code Sections J - Area Topography Pertinent Code Sections 1. 2. Section 10.61. Subd. 4 - General parking requirements. Section 10.61, Subd. 5 (A) - Setbacks for parking in residential districts: ”. . . open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a required yard except that such parking may be located in a rear yard to within 10 ’ of an interior side lot line and to within 10 ’ of a rear lot line.” (RR-IB Front Yard is 50 ’) 3. 4. Section 10.61, Subd. 9 - Design and maintenance of parking areas. Section 10.61, Subd. 10 (G): Parking requirement for any "Post Office" is ten spaces. Background The Crystal Bay Post Office was constructed in 1960 and acquired by the City around 1980. It is the only remaining structure of the Crystal Bay government complex, and is intended to continue in use as a post office for the foreseeable future. If , i • * > The post office luis never had a formal parking lot, and its customers, the majority ot which are Crystal Bay area residents, have either walked up or parked haphazardly on the shoulder in front of the building. The Public Works Department is proposing to construct a formal parking lot with a drive-through letter drop and eliminate parking on the shoulder. The standards for a parking lot in the RR-IB District require a 50’ front setback. Since the existing building is totally within the 50’ front yard, and its only public entrance is on the front of the build ine, a conforming parking lot would have to be directly west and to the rear of the building and would be inconvenient for the public. Funher. such parking lot would severely encroach into the existing Crystal Bay park and playground area. An ingress/egress driveway would have to cross the front yard in order to reach such a parking lot. Proposed Layout and Construction Please review the site plan. Exhibit D. The proposed parking lot will be on the south side of the building and provide five parking stalls plus a handicapped stall. A mail drop drive through is proposed with the northerly curb cut as entrance and southerly curb cut as exit. It is anticipated that the parking lot will consist of 8" of gravel base and 3" of biniminous surface. It is intended to be surfaced up to the building with concrete curbs at the head of each stall. The intent is to leave a 5’ walkway adjacent to the south side of the building. The parking lot will be striped, and it is anticipated that the apron in front of the building along County Road 146 will be posted no parking. The informal gravel parking area on the north side of the building will be reverted to grass. Note that while the code would require a minimum ten space parking lot for a new post office building, history has shown it is rare to see more than two or three cars at the Crystal Bay Post Office at one time. Use of the post office is not anticipated to increase significantly. Impact on Neighboring Properties At its proposed location, the parking lot will have minimal impact on the existing Crystal Bay playground. The proposed parking lot is 34 ’ from the side lot line with the adjacent residence to the south. There is existing screening south of the parking lot, site which is appropriate as a buffer to the neighboring property. Including Only Lots 1. 2 and 3 south of the closed Prospect Avenue, hardcover in the 500- 1.000* zone will increase from 5.6% to 12%. where 35% would be allowed. This area is relatively flat and drains generally eastward to the Dakota Rail right-of-way and then northwara eventually to a wetland in the Fox Hill area. No special drainage considerations are anticipated to be needed at this time. Staff Reconunendation Please review the description of hardship and unusual property conditions. If Planning Commission agrees that the proposed parking lot location is acceptable, then a recommendation for front setback variance approval would be appropriate. Planning Commission should note any I b. ;;t :li > '■■ ¥V-.' & 1^/- &• t; • I f ; appropriate conditions of j^^roval. Options for Action 1 . Approve as proposed, with or without conditions 2. Table for more information. 3. Recommend denial (state reasons) 4.Other. '■V' -'•T'* .V. ir n.^y 4 f J CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^ Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original applicauon) Variance for non-confonning structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) due fo I n 'k 11 f(do)^o nc Pr«^ use of property: ----1 Zoning District:_^^^J_fiL. (montli/ycar) Acquired, -------------------- ifv) ^assr/Omi ----------------- SaSisgp Address:___________________________ ^ ^ OWNER (if different tha^pplicani) Name 1 Arfrfrgxs! p.f). ACX CrLe. Phone(home) Phone (work) rflMSt^ctAk^ _Zip:,gl2^ description of requkt ~ criberequestindetai*' ' Estimated Construction Cost $ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage 'Z Setback: Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) hardship /description of preventing Describe undue hardship or practical would _ ^ comoliance with Zoning Code requuements:.Mee^^fl£^-------------------^ nTferparkinq lot within existing publir playground and paiJt- - inaress/eqr«ss driveways bnv>- fn rnnrtriirrnfl^*>»* setback area even if setback is met^ - - - - - - (attach additional sheets if necessary) fca ■ - -’ r . I?;/ ■5' t-r :•r •: required submittals nf th# folWry informatio n ^ submitted bv the apBlic:|^QH.d?^4Kqy da<^ in pcdgr fnr vour aDDligfltion to consIdCTtll CQinpIctCt y Comoleted Application Form ~7cMificd Proocrty Owners List of owners within 150 ’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). ^ SSSs L required. In addition, provide one (1) copy x 11' for survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any ctoges to existing grade d> o„‘(Ocopy 8.- X ir. '^5^'»ddendum*™this appiication. please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Aooiicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please rraer^ tot jaail nnuiicatim- i«romoiete if the nhovt infotmaHon hm noi tiwn Iiwlmteil^ information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. members for purposes of investigation and venficatjon of this reques . Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have ail subnuttals irao the City oftos 2J d^s b^n ** MCh^ottS! Meeting. Planning Commission M«^s are ^ Planning Commission to have an authorized agem attend in your piace and to advise the Buildmg & zoning this change prior to the meeting. 8 ^ /o-in-z3 S (4) $ (5) .‘lot I 9 P aTT .;; *9 SILi! ‘^niMT n I• aniA pj:"* 2 5m .E1!Q0-ES IIIMCTONKA AVE IP ®r J £ |a..\J^..a| „ V • («4)S’ na 0 ^/* M SO«) |(I6)S^ PROSPE 3 s yT5 a f •75i^ - a 1 . iT5 4 s s • :r^’s ;• n^-, »(J3)‘11 •t.l B a • 8w 3 9 (56)* ,.y 1 fe o no :.o s i)— ■■ ' i-t^T JJSL=lChXl.JLOoo 2-,_____A*c ---------. „ L^I Afc^v. Cir AJ. ._\hirutt**s^ AfAJ SSiS^1^ 'jy y & _fi^!«*:T4Ay/t> >l .«oe?o/475TtO^KATt^ MAJ cn^j//»V/7>21 21 QgS¥. _Ii£.-J&d2MES4ii?a^-----\___yACein_Aujw_5rAtA^..^33ri21 00/^ - - -A<cife_Aj_77 #-4_ W , Wh irff -________&>: y/i,(!li*ytrf:v_!8i^_/!MaJ 00 VI / ,c-/Pill'lLLZ-.%LyP-S3.- 75 m> *5 Ai-*<frw S»'*?7» : L ^__•“_ ; 5 90l Sr............J___2._____________________U(»«f>M ‘<i- s^il!___Atr;LgS'4giS ^.-c^ooyr.Ci-'ci ®JL ^k«^«p _____.RO. .. _.....C^s*w. (2.*^ -A<^ srst^*a "5? oorp______/2«)r s.ST 51/__/orin^2.i._A-y_r^sr.___AJVQ ^<g_ .JlP' lia::2.5-J5L ___ C/rt _K0u./«K_4Ct __________ -Sn.W to * yo« zs a /, dpr/ ^AtOA _Bo>!L//</_______ /«'/n-2-i 7/ oo«^ ______ Ui>ryr*>H^ ___ *:• ___JOdHy^_i_i_3A, £>o V7 _____.Cir»-0^-0/f«fip _____ ___________________________________________________ ___C>*^xjih^ f ____________ lQrJDr.%XM./0'ir>'2\ ifoioo £itua%J^ttL.K*:h^.STJ i=i____UJfi^zMTA SS3^_| L m' f Tw<ir C» 5 ^ ?WO ■ V. ' J-,-/ ,:^ •« C-tfTr __ f, 0» goy^C_________^ C(«vsn»t, C**f SS52? t-;' r>>^‘ y r •i.^v :,-\. :r^. . Ii:WL- •-.■ ■.. -t. ^ -V^-; >.v> :i '■ ;> ■ CITY OF OHONO OF LOT 3. BLOCK 1, MARKVILLE I %3 79f fn9*20 ’3crw LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: Lot 3, Block 1, MARKVILLE o: denotes iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of and existing shed thereon, the location of an existing buil'ding on the adjoining property to the North, and the proposed location of a proposed parking lot. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroac'ments. t. A ■I ft ■>•.;S ■i c\. -C::v li- 75-250'25-500' HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 ITTffCTiNC hardcover IN 3! A. " 500-11 •iwL:S.F. /<goS S.F. B. Gaiage aoo D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Deck F. Laodsc^ Uoderiaia By Plastic S.F. G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in zone X 100 PpopnsED habik :^^^ ^ A. House _/COQ— I!S.F. ------------------^S.F. So LoO / ^3-Q S.F. ^2-; 2^CoO 1 D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic S.F. O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A + B /7^S^<8 X 100 2,S%> i I ; • i ^ r - ■ ♦, i ♦. •< ^ •> « >•- tv . f %.\ .,’r-*-•■ , j ' ■ ». « ; \*y. ,• , . •*■ ?’.f .-i ' Hennepin County JL An Equal Opportunity Employer / SEP Z\ September 16, 1994 CMichael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 RE: Proposed Site Plan - Post Office ^ _eSAH 146, west side approximately 240 feet north of North Shore Or Section 10, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 2181 Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Gaffron: We reviewed the above site plan and make the following comments: • The location of the proposed access, approximately 34 feet north of the south line of lot 3, is acceptable. The developer must have an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning access construction. The developer should contact Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548 for permit forms. • As a safety benefit after the parking lot is constructed, the City should prohibit parking on the road shoulders in front of the Post Office. At the City’s request, by Council resolution, Hennepin County will provide and install no parking signs alo»'g the shoulders of CSAH 146. • All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for utility permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way, disturbed during construction. Please direct any response to Doug Mattson. Sincerely, ---------------------------------------- Thomas D. Jqhnson, P.E. Tran$port»t^pP}«n|,n^^|}e^^^^^ ______________ TDJ/DBM ” 16^ 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins. Minnesota 55343-8468 (612) 930-2670 FAX:(612) 930-2513 TDD:(612) 930-2696 RicyckJ Paper I :r-. ^'V r;' ; ^ I ;i-> -^/'Z 6 TO:Planning Commissioii Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gafliron, Asst. Planning A Zoning Administrator DATE:September 12. 1994 SUBJECT: #1969 City of Ofono. 1355 Brown Road South - Variance - Public Hearing Requested Tabling Thii is for variances for coosttuction of a paiking lot for the Crystal Bay Ofto. The City Administrator has requested the item be tabled until the October meetuig while p for the parking lot are further developed. /-O J -MR - •*: ■ .• f^' i'. .i' : i i.. f i '-.■ r:- t. ^ /9 H REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 18, 1994 ITEM NO; / F Department Approval: Name Ron Moone Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrators Report Item Descri. Post Office Parking Lot At a recent Counca meeting, staff requested Council to refer a setback varia^ tetated to tte review the property line of the residential property to the south. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to refer the applicauon for a setback variance, to enable the construction of a parking iot for the Crystal Bay Post Office, to the Planning Commission. i -i-'i: ■ J- ; ■ 'v-.-i. r . L'-' k>-» f t ■< ‘r. >«Sj. ., P r' I*.' it - < ■ ,-i J-tf i li if/ -V 4r n H request for council action DATE: August 18, 1994 ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Nttuc Ron Moorse Title City Adoinistrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrators Report •__aJ • 1 tJ IItem Descnp Post Office Paiking Lot i. , _____ meetiiig. suff requested Council to refer a setback varia^ related to the ^.^tS. o?a parking 1« for U« Crystal _Bay Post Off^ to ^ At that time Z S»tS provide a map showing the approximate sto ^ locanon rw^t^beZ^-review The southern edge of the proposed parking lot would be the property line of the residential property to the south. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: ..J- r:- •r « s 10.61 sum of four square feet per front foot of builJing, Plus one square foot per front foot of property not occupied by a building. No Individual sign surface shall exceed 100 square feet. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 "B-1", "B- more than principal feet from feet may principal D "B-l" "B-2'* and "B-4": Height. Within the •?:o*"4e?;S:vr'?hV "IStapet oVlnJ building nor shall any sign be located any property line except that any sign over project two feet Into any required yard area from the building. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 " or **I"E "B-3" and "I": Height. Within any "B-3 District no sign shall extend In height more than six h*iaht above thc^ highest outside wall or parapet of any principal NO Sian shall be located closer than ten feet from any property ’ line except that any sign exceeding project only two feet Into the yard area from any building. subd 4. Purpose of Off-Street Parking and Loading Reaulrements Regulation of off-street parking and loading spaces In^thls Chapter Is to alleviate or prevent congestion of rlght-lf-way and so to promote the safety and 9®n®t®l et the public by establishing minimum requirements ® parking, loading and unloading from motor Sith the utilization of various parcels of All applications for an occupancy certificate In all districts shall be accompanied by a site plan drawn to f Indicating the location of off-street parking and loading spaces compliance with the following requirements: Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 A Application of Parking Rules All Districts. In addition to the regulations and requirements set forth this Chapter, the foUowinq regulations and '\\*jfted of£-street parking shall apply ^ off-street parking facilities in all use districts. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 B. Parking Requirements Waived for construction on September 14, 1967. Structure or uses for which^a building permit has been issued prior to September 14, 196 , ORONO CC 382 (4-1-84) H.- s 10.61 for Which s\\ac?u^rii's°ta wVmn six ’months'^»ftec September 16, 1967. and continues to completion. '• d WadVna" spYcVs «is\in^ on “septembec l“ 1967, SSlll"^oTSrce3uced i^n^^ unless laid number exceeds the ?S|uire«entS set forth herein for a similar new use. Other than warehousing. Sr other similar seating “r the purpose offacility shall be counted as one seat tor cne p p determining required parking. c c4,o of Parkina Spaces. Each parking space Shall be not less than nine ‘by*"«c'eVs‘ d?i«"sV" fS? each space shall ^eauirements, one parking S^:S’Vor°one*«SiSU""shru igSal/lOO square feet of storage and maneuvering area including access drives. G. Commercial Vehicle Patl'i'’?-, .. Jtllixed sSlel? facilities accessory to '•»l'^*"V„*«ohi\*.s No mot« “.”^1^0*0? tot the packing of passenger automobiles. No motor trailer 7,000 pounds gross capacity and “ except whenshall packed or stored in a distticc^exc^P^ loading, unloading or - „« the owner or operator of vehicle may be packed at ^“j' ^f^f'IJ^g ghall parking facilities said vehicle. Omiet no «(o? open area storage rf'Vo-«Lria"lehi"c\^%\nor“Vr OF-,»^;„PVy^grs’ iw^rrV.ra” oTbu?in«s or TaVufacturing establishments other than ?Se h^e occupation permitted for that property- H Location of Packing. Required parking in the’-R” Districts shall be on the same lot as the principal building. Subd. 5. Setbacks '« Req“^ parking in all districts shall meet the followi g requirements: ORONO CC 383 (4-1-84) r>-.f - •« ii ■. S 10.61 A *R" Districts. Within all "R” Districts all vehicles notmallV owned ot kept by the occupants on the premises must h “e a oarage stall or open parking space on the same lot as ►Ho US0 S6rv©d» Gar2i9^ st^Xls accessory to rasidantlal sUultuMS may be located anywhele on the lot other than a required vard area except that such garages may be located to within ten rk;5rma‘y bVc^rte^i-’ts ffea? interior siL lot line and to within ten feet of a rear lot line. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 B "B" Districts. Within the "B-2" District oarklna mav not*be allowed in any required yard or landscaping frea ^WiS^in the "B-1", "B-3- and "B-4" Districts parking spaces t'^iVt t“arpark?ng may be located in a rear yard to within three of I-ha rear or Side lot line unless the rear or side lot line is in common with an "R” District;^ then the setback distance shall be the same as required for the R District. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 C "I" Districts. Within "I'* Districts, off-street parking spaces s'hall be not less than twenty feet from any street ?lahi-of-wav line nor leas than five feet from any interior side lot line or rear lot line, except when a side ^w”*-otabutting an "R" District. Then, off-street parking shall be no less than ten feet from said lot lines. Subd. 6. Joint Parking. Required serving two or mors uses in the -B- or -I" "Vn/^i^l so on the same lot provided that the total number of s^o,*ate furnished shall be not less than the sum total of the separ requirements for each use and provided: A. The proposed joint parking space is within thirty feet of the use it will serve. B. The applicant(s) shall show that fhe'e is no substantial conflict in the PtioolP*! «®oarklnqmorrhulldings or uses for which joint use of off-street parking facilities is P-Posed,^and,^^ instrument approved by the City Attorney, executed by the city«f off-street parking facilities shall be filed with the cicy Clerk. Said in^struroent may be a three or more party agreement including the City. ORONO CC 384 (4-1-84) i- § 10.61 ^ 7 control of Parking Facilities. When requited 4. sftrina facilities are provided elsewhere thanaccessory off-street park g^^ 1 use served is loca'-ed, written Subd accessory off-street served is located, written on the lot on which the P P^y off-street parking shall be authority for ^*.-,^««intain the required number of off- liieet''poking ^^int"* s1ialV"bV^located the principal use or building served. subd. 8. Storage be'^t mted “^en oV'|ooS.*or Storage of vehicles which are inoperable, for lease, tent or sale. subd. 9. Design and Maintenance of Parking Areas n Patkino areas shall be designed so as eo provide a„ ^ t^^irVl.^it ?i^7idVh pSblic' VTlk^ceSter* 1 fc *m<Jve^men\® ^ a \V o^f f-st^reet* p*a%ing public sti^et, , 1®- d off-siirei p^?KtSg sp"a«"s \\%uUs ?u "‘"f«clirn: M?h*fractlon“of one-half or »ore shall constitute another space. c signs. Signs located in any parking •'** necessary for oiderVoperatj^on of Addition to accessory signs otherwise permitted. p r.trhi- ’ All Open off-street patki.ig designed to have'head-ln a^nd" ptopefly^ lo«"ted*to tire bumper or curb will project beyond the requitedensure that no part of any car will project ]f setbacks. f^?he s“tTc‘t'urt s°eV;ld“i%*'is"us “el; thrri*ni»‘JS ILu'nV’Vac'iUties^lpen or enclosed) shall be as shown. A Single Family Dwelling. Two unit b! Multiple Dwelling. Two per dwelling u ORONO CC 385 (4-1-84) i ; ■ *: K> s 10.61 C. Motel, Motor Hotel, Motor Court or Hotel. Four spaces plus at least one parking space for each guest room provided in the design of the building. D. School, High School Through College. At least one parking space for each seven students based on design capacity plus one for each three classrooms. E. Churches, Auditoriums, Undertaking Establishments. At least one parking space for each four seats based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall. F. Theater, Athletic Field. At least one parking space for each six seats of design capacity. G. Community Center, Post Office, YMCA, YWCA, Physical Cultural Studio, Pool Halls, Libraries, Private Clubs, Lodges, Museums. Ten spaces plus one for each 300 square feet of floor area in excess of 2,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. ^ . H. Hospital. At least one parking space for each three hospital beds. I. Golf Courses, Country Clubs, Tennis Club, Public Swimming Pools. Twenty spaces plus one for each 300 square feet excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. , . .J. Day Nurseries. Four plus one for each 500 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date; 9-14-67 K. Office Buildings and Professional Offices, Banks, Savings Institutions. At least one parking space for each 200 square feet of floor area. Source; Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date; 1-1-75 L. Drive-In Establishments. At least one parking space for each fifteen square feet of floor area in the building. M. Bowling Alley. At least six parking spaces Cor each alley. N. Motor Service Stations. At least three off- street parking spaces plus two additional off-street parking spaces for each service stall. ..... ....O. Retail Sales and Service Establishments. At least one off-street parking space for each 150 square feet o, net floor area. ORONO CC 386 (3-1-84) mg ich >00 the ing for i 84) S 10.61 p Restaurants, Cafes, Bars, Taverns, Night Clubs. ^ —K on eniiara feet of public floor area. At least one ®„itute Store, Appliance Store, Warehouse under 15,000 onV^atianV sp«*e' for'%"ch‘®50fl sqwre £etf ire“xcess o£ the £irst 500 square £eet o£ £loor area In the principal structure. R Auto Repair-Major, Bus Terminals, Taxi Terminals, Boa^and"ferine Scales G^ar^Supp"; Shop £or Trade °iea”®Ught o££-st?eet Stores, Building for each 800 square £eet functions. S. Skating Rinks, Ski Areas, square feet of floor area over 1,000 square feet. T Manufacturing, Fabrication or Processing of a n ^ I- nr Manorial At least four off“Street parking spaces, plus :':n'd‘di^\on^\*%‘^ice;£^or^*^ach 800 sg„a„ feet of PuUaf„, One l^"oV%«\e°Ve;V'oV^r^aVttirt^h^^%^^^“^U^^^^ levoted to outside Storage. half. QiiKH '7. Location of Loading Berths. All loading r!gh'’t-o*£-iay‘’^i^^.s!®‘ Lo'ad?ng l«"th\^%h‘"u'no°t“lccupy‘ any yard requirement bordering a street. «?nhH 13 Size of Loading Berths. Unless specified, but not 'ess than 12 £eet in width ana ^ length, all loading rths shall maintain a height of more. Subd. 14. Access to Loading Berths. Each gt^.t shall be located with appropriate ■"e»''s or alley in a manner which will least interfere with ORONO CC 387 (4-1-84) 940 7 148. Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator rr*WV« «« % I request for council action ^ ^ DATE: atfmMm ITEM NO.: ^ Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Brian Kipfer/Greg Sargent. 320 Tumham Road - Conditional Use Permit - Denial Resolution Zonine District: RR-IA, Minimum lot area is 5 acres *ToS^ = 123.552 s.f. or 2.8 acres (conditional use permit code ivouM require 10 acres for a second residential unit) Additional Exhibits a ,• »L - Planning Commission Action Notice to Applicants Brief Review of Application Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated October 7, 1994 for more background on this review Suff required applicants to file a conditional use peimit for a guest house use m ptSTivi^ ire^xpanskii within a detached garage curremly under co.^'"" ^ve tte S^tofor use as an independem residential unit. The property could ^ ^uired tot area sundard needed for a guest house use. It is not ai^ current owners to ever use the expanded living space as a ^est house. Tlw arw will se^e as a studio or work area for applicants ’ professional use. Both men arc artists. The 8 residence could not be expanded upon to provide them the necessary space or environment fw Te former detached garage was a two-story multi-puipose stru^re serving^ a stable and garage. Applicants felt that the detached garage could be expanded upon pro g them with additional work area. The Planning Commission was asked to review the improvenrtiits to determine if my of .he imorOTen«n« should either be eliminated or altered. Planmng Commission membw Lmnim^ly concurred that it would not be necessary to make any changes in the propos^ “rb^Tomertei oltodependem residential unit. In tire granting of abuil^ naapmit for the expanded living area, applicants would be required to tile an appropriate dee restriction advising all future owners of the limitations on the use of the expanded in the detached garage. The City Attorney has been asked to draft a deed restriction that m be executed before a building permit can be issued. V i . • >. 48*1 • -*8. I": * K=.- Reque^ for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 November 10. 1994 Zoning File #1971 The Planning Commission considered the issue of any conflicts with the home occupation code as to the ^>plicants* use of the detached garage. Members found that the professional use of their residence was accessory to their principal professional activities and not the primary location of their professional activities. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: The enclosed denial resolution has been drafted to include the necessary findings for denial. Council may either amend or adopt the enclosed resolution. i'- A RESOLUTION DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) FILE #1971 ^ V.! WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Brian A. Kipfer and Greg H. Sargent, (hereinafter "the Applicants") are the owners of the property located at 320 Tumham Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lots 1 and 2. Block 1, Chippewa Third Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the Property"); and WHEREAS, on September 19, 1994 the Applicants applied to the City of Orono requesting the City issue a building permit for certain year round living area expansions within a detached garage; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission in consideration of the Applicants’ request, reviewed the potential for easy conversion of the expanded area as an independent residential unit or guest house, and act^ upon such request for a conditional use permit, as though such request included such use; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Orono (hereinafter "Council") has considered this application including written reports by the City staff, the unanimous recommendation of the Plaiming Conunission, the comments and written statements of the applicants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Council hereby denies a conditional use permit based on one or more of the following findings of fact: h Page 1 of 8 jc FINDINGS ■M 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1971. 2. The property is located in the RR-1A Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 5 acres of dry buildable land as minimum area for a residential lot. The property consists of 123,552 s.f. or 2.8 acres. 3. Per Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) all regular lot requirements slull be met by a guest house. The area requirements for the RR-IA Zoning Districts arc as follows: Required lot area = 10 acres Existing = 2.8 acres Variance = 7.2 acres or 72%. 4. On September 2, 1994 applicants filed an application for a building permit for construction of a detached garage with two floors of finished living space. The lower level consists of a ftill bathroom, potting room for plams and garden materials. A general work area contains a deep sink for cleaning paint brushes and other equipment. The upper level consists of a loft studio work area. 5. The footprint of the detached stnicture is approximately 38 ’x24’. 6. On September 20, 1994 the building staff issued a permit for construction of the detached garage but did not include portions of the finished living space as shown on floor plans included as page 7 and 8 of this resolutioi. until the Council formally acted on a conditional use permit because of the potential for guest house use. 7. In an addendum to the conditional use permit dated Septemter 19, 1994, applicants stated their intent and proposed use of the expanded living space as follows: . .We plan on keeping the two stall garage spaces much like the existing building. We also intend to add additional space to provide us with an area to work on fine art and design projects. The studio space would allow us the opportunity to create in a more open sening with better natural light. . . In both cases the building of the garage would not increase traffic or bring additional Page 2 of 8 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) day of , 199 before me a Notary Public withinand for said county, personally appeared-------------------^^ known to me to be the person(s) desenbed m and who executed the foregoing instrument, andacknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ■J On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared_____________^____________ known to me to be the person(s) desenbed m and who executed thf fop^g^ing instniment. and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 6 of 8 i i H: ■% business lo our home or neighborhood. It is our intent that the strucmre be insulated and finished to allow us to heat and cool the work area but by no means is it intended or designed to function as a separate living space. The flooring is cement with some panicle board sub-flooring in the work spaces. The bathroom is designed to function as a potting room for plants and garden materials and has a deep sink for cleaning paint bruj-ies. etc. We do not intend to rent out this space or use it for commercial retaU, we also do not intend that it be used for a guest house or apartment. The garage has no kitchen or food prep area and no bedrooms. On October 17.1994 the Orono Planning Commission considered the conditional use permit as proposed and recommended denial of a conditional use permit based on one or more of the following findings: A. Property does not meet the required area standard for a second residential unit. It is not the intent of the applicants to create a separate independent unit or guest house of the structure. It shall merely function as an accessory auxiliary use of the principal strucmre. C The finished living area will serve as a work place. Applicants do not propose a bedroom or kitchen use within the expanded living space. 9. At their October 17, 1994 meeting the Planning Commission w^ asked to consider the proposed living area expansions to determine if any modifications or eliminations would be necessary. The Planning Commission reco^ended that no modifications or eliminations be made in any of the proposed improvements but directed that because of the potential for easy conversion to guest house use that an appropriate deed restriction be developed to alert all fumre property owners that this strucmre could never be converted into a guest house. 10. Per Section 10.03. Subdivision 7, "One Building Per Lot" Except in the case of a planned residential development as provided for hereinafter, no more than one principal building shall be located on a lot . . ." B Page 3 of 8 4 i 11. Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 11, "Dwelling Use Prohibited. No cellar, basement, tent, trailer or accessory building shall at any time be used as an occupied dwelling. 12. The Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for a guest house use would be in complete conflict with the objectives and intent of the code section that governs guest house use. 13. The Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for a guest house use would be in conflict with the intent of the RR-IA Rural Residential Zoning District and the rural policies set forth in its Comprehensive Municipal Plan. FURTHER* BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono in denying this conditional use permit for a guest house use of the accessory structure located at 320 Tumham Road and further directs the City staff to issue a building permit to allow the year round living area expansions as shown on pages 7 and 8 of this resolution, subject to the following condition'. 1. 3. The finished living area or future additions to this structure may never be converted to a bedroom or kitchen use. Violation of or noncompliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misden^nor. The undersigned applicants, Brian A. Kipfer and Greg H. Sargent, have read, urxlerstood atxl hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property; and shall execute a restrictive covenant. Page 4 of 8 ^ ■■-i-f it.! v:' , \ ^ \ \ « • X •.■!•“: D t. • I :l*' r •’.'ft • • ifc • i*V . I y • t 1 \ \ •* ?> * W> A -A ^-'=’ "" / *%\ i\. / *•* : / * t 1 » ■« : :i>' ':Mli -ti• k li» ■i-'* ■ lil a t * • « C • * • •• k * ’• : 4* t. > *«rr^ ‘ .1 ■':iivi\4 ‘ 1 ; \\-:> I'l^: »* * I • 'ih • • I !l \ ;-t \ \ / T.J I ^ i|. I . ! if-: - • ;•.Li> S % • dl) <) I. t 1 -1 f’A ’‘IS ■ •• •• -.Sib { ) t 'J\ I 1 .,.1, 1 ^ \%" I m i 4 - 'r, (1 H . H:• ♦ » t * • If I % »*L® ^ .?• ": ’ ;*, - • •»’ »‘ I f \ '.i'r 5 • i •' ^ V : • V . '• •r V ■#. r Vf. • , * .If* * , •* /mI <. i * J*.^ V • ■ -!s'^ i -i % ^ 3II ''M 1 •v^‘: ^10 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator October 7. 1994 SUBJECT: #1971 Brian Kipfer/Greg Sargent, 320 Tumham Road - Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA. minimum lot area is 5 acres. Application: Applicants have been required to file a conditional use permit for guest house use as proposed year round living area expansions within detached garage have potential for use as an independent residential unit. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.27, Subd. 3 (A) • Conditional use permit required for guest house use. Regular lot standards shall be met. Section 10.27, Subd. 5 (B) - RR-IA lot standards. Required lot area for two residential units = Existing ^ 123,552 s.f. or 2.8 acres. Variance = 7.2 acres or 72%. Definition 30 > Home Occupation. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicants' Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Building Permit #006450 F - Lower Level Floor Plan G - Upper Level Floor Plan H • Street/West Elevation I - East/Rear Elevation J - Weckman Memo 10/4/94 K - Survey 10 acres. Zoning File #1971 October 7. 1994 Page 2 T| i I I r Request for Ccmditioiial Use Permit Applicants propose the reconstruction of a detached garage/stable with a new two story garage with additional living area expansion. The footprint of the detached structure will be 38 ’x24’ with a first floor level covered porch addition at the south side of structure. The new strocture will be constructed with the same exterior material/finish as the residence structure. Per Exhibit B, applicants* addendum, applicants note that it is not their intention to create a studio apartment or guest house within the proposed living space of the detached garage currently under construction. The issue for the building staff in doing the plan review is that the structure will have plumbing and heating and living space will be for year round use. There is a full bathroom on the lower level with a shower and the auxiliary room adjacent to the bathroom area shall be equipped with a large work sink. The sink will serve the applicants with their painting/design projects. It is possible that this same type of sink could function for laundry and kitchen use. The only element needed to convert this structure to an independent residential unit would be the plugging in of a stove and refrigerator. The structure as proposed could function as independent residential '- .nit. As noted above, the code would require 10 acres in area to support two residential units. The property consists of 2.8 acres and would never be approved for guest house use The code does not address living space expansions within detached garages or other detach>i structures on a property. There are no code prohibitions or restrictions in the zoning code which disallow the proposed use. The problem is the potential for violations of the zoning code with unauthorized expansions of the living space to more intense unauthorized use. Review Exhibit B as it relates to applicants* use of the studio area. The studio or work area for both applicants woulW appear to be accessory to their principal employment serving as expanded work area/space. Issues for Consideration 1.The lot contains 2.8 acres and would never meet the area standard for a second residential unit. Does the mere denial of a conditional use permit being filed on the chain of title provide adequate controls for the proposed living space area? Should other modifications be made in the proposed improvement plan that would provide greater protection to the City for unauthorized expansions in use? Members shared comments on the following proposed improvements: Zoning File ;l'1971 October 7, 1994 Page 3 A. Year round use of facility. B. Pluoibing ind heating. Potential use for bedrooms. Bathroom with shower. 2. E. Others raised by Planning Commission. Would the proposed professional use of the auxiliary structure present conflicts with home occupation code? Should Greg Sargent be required to file a home occupation license ai^lication? Can the existing residence be used for expansion to provide additional work space area? Review Exhibit K. note residence structure cannot be expanded on south and west sides because of substandard setbacks. Existing improvements on east and north side of residence may pose expansion problems. This matter was not addressed in applicants’ addendum but in conversation with one of the applicants at my site inspection, the specific character and design of existing residence was discussed. It may be impossible to expand existing residence without destroying character of residence structure. What should be the City ’s concerns when allowing living space expansions within detached structures? What kind of controls are necessary to prevent future violations? Is a code amendment needed? \ii Issues of Action To approve as proposed; or To approve as amended; or To table application providing applicants additional time to consider other options. The delay in this review may create problems for applicants for the garage currently being constructed. 1 j#wr 1-1^'#1 city of ORONO • GENERAL LAND USB^I wLICX tION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ^2^ rU^lsiU»M ------------ Type of Application to be Filed V u n A I » U * W • * W W r .^--r Tr*T WV'«^ V'VV'W' I'i V r UW»^a f «.*• , k. ' k 11.* ( •• • ^wa- • f vu Property Identulcation Number (P.I.D.) ; i • • ’«-> \r,iT-* a w' •• V a » V* a APPLICANT Name 0A<A»J Name / Phone (borne) (^IZ] ATTh*^A‘L^ ____________ P*»» (work) ^7) r R^>0 City ------------Zip fir/ffirfr Address KP/P Phone (bome)(fr/2.) 4-T3"^4^g Phone (work) g.i^} aiT.R* Zip DatePropeny Acquired tTli.L»y ^ ^ ^ ^^4* I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of Ian (month/year) els of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) y ~ $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments -------------- $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Us<* $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling -101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPUCATIONS ^ ^ ' • ^ • $266.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$250.00 Vacation • • ’ _____$175.00 Easement Vacation _____$ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.(X) Comprehensive Plan Amendment •••• K !•%•%% ^$100J)0 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule ✓ ,• PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District_____ Present Use of Property X Residential ^UL4^ C'JiiLo Other (specify). f : ^ • 5* required submotals 1 Completed Application Fonn. 7 Describe request in detail. , , ------Certified Property Owneri Eiii of owprs .wjthin-2|50' (you can obtain this list from ■ R^ooepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center. 348-3271), A Pl2lt-------Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey .i' i- :i ': description to application if W:iocl»«led.oii,i<|^ • Xopogn^ suivay.(existing and.ppipcBed e^fWMf$>if land alienoons involve V- ' ■. • iStTtte te^Smef^ude marital satus) of aU persons with an1tiiett|t^the ■ - •V': •• nioDeriy Tto would include nainefs) of appliev«sJ.,if.noifu^nt ownerfs). • Q- C^miction pUh. »Wlicab>« VjQ ------As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons ‘ you wish notified of thi%-4>plicauoft. . ; 'X '\S5KST(S^''”SUBMITTED. (Staff wUl require to scale drawmgs of all documents, plans, etc. to submitted.) The Applicam and Property Owner must sign this application. PIea« romemher that your ^plicaLn is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use AppliiWion is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:________________________------------------- supplied is true and correct tj/tl^ best of his/ter knowledge. Applicant's signature _ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request • I • • • • i* Date a>Pr. /f, I _ Date ja_sffi_raa4tOwner’s signamre _ ^ of change prior co the meeting. September 19, 1994 J j To Whom It May Concern: It is our intent and hope to rebuild the current garage structure at 320 Turnham Road. Orono, MN 55359. In the restructuring of the building, we plan on keeping the two stall garage spaces much like the building is currently. We also intend to add additional space to provide us with an area to work on fine art and design projects. This studio space would allow us the opportunity to create in a more open setting with better natural light. I, Brian Kipfer, am employed as a creative director for a giftware company. Midwest of Cannon Falls, located in Cannon Falls. MN. approximately 30 miles from Orono. I do bring artwork home to complete for my employer as well as enjoy watercolor painting as a hobby, but do not run a business out of my home. The addition of plumbing in the garage would allow me to paint without having to transport water back and forth from the house to the garage. Greg Sargent Is self employed providing freelance graphic design, packaging, and computer training to companies in the Twin Cities. Meetings take place in the client's offices. Greg would use the garage for additional space for his personal computer and equipment. In both cases the building of the garage would not Increase traffic or bring additional business to our home or neighborhood. It is also our intent that the structure be insulated and finished to allow us to heat and cool the work area but by no means is it intended or designed to function as a separate living space. The flooring is cement with some particle board sub-flooring In the work spaces. The bathroom is designed to function as a potting room for plants and garden materials and has a deep sink for cleaning paint brushes etc. We do not intend to rent out this space or use it for commercial retail, we also do not intend that it be used for a guest house or apartment. The garage space has no kitchen or food prep area and no bedrooms. We appreciate the consideration and interest in the project and want to assist in any manner that we can to make it reality. We will gladly answer any further questions or provide additional information. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincerely, /Brian Kiofer ^ • h MM MTt MTCN OOf NMMiPlM COUNTY M09CRTY INrOteUTION SVSTCN ragPCRTY OMCRS LIST RCraiT NO. RlRSMl r*6C lY % ^ •TAMOmilNMM/SOM St Sl-llt>U iS oooc OOttt TUMtMH to L I MHO t R H KtO LtONtRO • KATHLCCN H tCRO 4t0 TURNWM to HttLK ttASN m tSSSY St Sl-llt-IS IS OOOS 0«S4S NATCRTON RO OONALO R PCAtSON I MFC OONALO R tCAtSON «S«5 NRTCRTOltl ROAD HARLt RLAIN W4 S5S59 St n-iit-cs ISOAttS NATIRTONN Rt N R t N N FILlMORf MILAN • MICMCLLI FXLLMORI A2Y5 NATCRTtRt* RO NARLC RLAIN IM SSSSt *4A ■.• I J* V St Sl-llt>IS 2A.000S OOtCt 1UMUN RO MXUXAN N OTfMRf L ITAL TIMOTHY N • AtMA H OTTIN ttS TURNMAM RO NARU RLAIN FM SSS5R 50 SI>llt-2S SI OOOA costs TURNMAN RO C I RNCLRS A J C RNELRS CHARLES E/JENNIFER C RHELRS 505 TURNNAN RO ORONO MN 5S55C SO 51-IlO-ES Si 0000 04455 MOLVERTON RL 0 R A R L QRANDSTRAND OAVIO R/KAREN L CRANOSTRANt 4435 NOLVERTON RL ORONO m 55S50 tH I '* ‘fi,vTANRAVERNMM/AOMI St Sl-iXt>tS Si 0010 ' Most ADDRESS UNASSI6NED NARY L RETERSON TAMRAYER UNKNOFM SO Sl-llO-ZS At 0005 04555 CHIRRENA LA FREDERICK E SHEMANER JR ETAL FRED E SHEMANER RT t SDK 14MARL! RLAIN MN 55550!. ■50 51-110-tS 4t 0004 04505 CHIRRENA LA J N FRITZLER ET AL J HARC FRITZLER AND OESYL L RETERSON 4505 CHIRRENA U NARLE RLAIN MN SISSO I' ^0^TAMRAYER St Sl-llO-tS At 0M7 OOIAO TURMIAH RO OERNARO N SALE OERNARO N OAU HARit RLAIN tM 55550 50 51-110-tS 4t 0000 005M TURNNAM RD 0 E A 0 F NERZ OOUCLAS E A OIANE F NERZ 500 TUMIAN RO NARLE RLAIN Ml 55350 50 51-110-tS AZ OMO 04525 CHIRRENA U RONALD R OEMULLINB ETAL RONALD R OENULLXNO 45tS CHIRRENA LANE NARLE RLAIN Ml 55550 SO Sl-llO-tS 4t MIO 50 5i>110*t5 4t 0015 . MHP MOt OASli CHIRRENA U M520 TURNHAN RD •....• OMSK MMI TAMRAYER OWOORT NALLOXN ETAL 0 H SARGENT A 0 A RXRFER i: i'-OREMIIV NALLOIN 0 H SARGENT ADA RXRFERk; nAme/aoor ASIS CHIRRENA LANE 520 TURNHAN RO :l ■ f''"'• NARLE RLAIN Ml S5SS0 NARLE RLAIN Ml 55550 « 0 t•SO St-IiO-tS 42 Mil K- K-Ptot AOOR 04SM CHIRRENA U K OMNER NAME L B NARTXNIAU/J N NARTXNEAU r; .TAMRAYER LARRY E A JEAN H NARTXNEAU TOTAL BATCH 005 000X4 r V. I'" 'r. ; mm/toon ■I 4S00 CHIRRENA U NARLk RUIN Ml 55550 ■* ■ (' =•» ■* * 4 ' • A t 50 51-110-tS 4t MIO OOStO niRNHAM RO 0 N SARCENT A • A RtRFER 0 H SARGENT ADA RXROCR 520 TURNHAN RO NARLE RUIN MN 55S50 ■?.l \• /. I 4%^ • \ •• Hi-« . .iV 4 I 4 IV ■ \<4* > f . (>. • A •. •H* #•; ■ .t i mm MTt 09/itm ^ ’ MTCN OOf NilMnN COUNTY MOKiTY XNrONHATXON SYSTCH PfIQKRTY OmiPS LIST KCPOtT NO. OmSMI PMi XOIfe’ V A’ -- • '“* 'i-r m: >r':-.v p 1 CCRTXrV THAT THE FACTS REFIKSINrfO AM AN ACCURATt MFMSCNTATXON OF XNFOANATION AS XT AFPEAAS TNXS MTl ON THE MCOROS OF THE KNNEPXN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO TM KST OF NY KNONUOOE AND KLIEF OATE J^idXLo . Vp• 1,‘*iOU'V ■% :.V‘ »/« ' •r • •rm II' /,«! < r* ' , « w . » » ' , . .1 . * • •• • • t" -1 I \ ( >1:imi I H vr* -j ■f ' :• a: < I r < ■>,?4' i\.s. •r , k \ J ■ . • * • % • V . \ ‘•I ; : •< 1 ■> - ■ '■^'l • • * * % ••r^’....... I ■wm '■.■•■ j -# .** < i' ‘' • ‘l! ? > r U 1 .• ■~tt -qrr" • / /1 \ N. * > w 9\1—1 9 4 "1 >1-J_ 1. 1 -rt - I .• v.'f. " n ‘ '•n ;l ' \ r :' • f - fc- < '^.- *1 »V »' • t f 3®7 lie____ /■\ s / -is:r »* • / 1 w* 1 nij \ i' I.--'4-- 'H r-'i, 41.---------- 1 .1 :\ IK i ';V •I u \ 1 1 ^ ]H J \ 1 1 1 t ll-u r. nr- V * ;L J.. J ‘ 1 t1 iL A 1 ♦. ,\ ' #♦ i » 7- IV. ’■'W- L. r----:*• » ■. • } I i.- K*'* :a\hx^ . * ; S;.r'vW. ~<k / . • % \ f I \\ / ■;::‘ 1-./ 1 ■ ■■’' ' ■ /ji' I ■'* • *'•■, /' i ^ * iiv : > '•■., ,•*'■ .M J',' ■" ?1-'rv rfti .. ■«:'[;#11' <! * t« * . 4 'S\y^ 4 • * i Jeanne A Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager October 4, 1994 SUBJECT: Application #1971 Brian Kipfer/Greg Sargent. Conditional Use Pennit Septic Review The applicants propose to rebuild the existing garage with another garage of similar size including a bathroom and additional plumbing facilities for a work space. The existing septic system must have a suitable capacity for the additional plumbing to be installed in this staicture. The existing septic system is designed for a four bedroom residence, while the existing residence has only three bedrooms. The additional water usage anticipated from the proposed work space will likely not exceed the capabilities of the draintield. w Cei t 1 f ii'oti? ol Survey Tot Mri.ui Kipf.M \ (li o>j .S.n ' » MK)i'k 1, I'lliriMiWA Till HU ADDITION l!'Uin<-|Mn <‘-..untv, Minn.";oVu S8y'2 ‘T‘?5 f ippewo 352.ap MO CO ORONO COPY o Q nA i.e/s'rvOi o._; CITY OF ORONO / SITE PUH__GRAUING PLAN i/. Ai'i'nnvi.n ’ SI i I'.ovtl) WITH REVISIONS DAii; u> M O'. Iw t^cA-noAJ A6 /iev».0US HO 00 352.00 one 'AJ U» l.C‘q«> 1 Descr i p L uy n Lot:s 1 unci 2, Hlnek 1, ( Ml 1 IM’l-WA THIRD Al M) I M’1 (:1 J . ‘rhis survey r.liows l he lo.Miron oJ all ex i s l i luj Duildinq.s on I li<- above lU.*scji i ijeci [<io[i'-ily. It does n«i' iiui[)oit 'o ,;uow .iiiy oibei i I'lprov •i..(?nLs O' 1 mu: I o.icbm. Ml 1 . •: lion markei iDund i JP\l/>o 1C 0 ding Pl^N ONS ta |C£I M O' A6 TL^tdh^ CA(yrt CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crjstal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1971 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 10/26/94 TO: Brian Kipter 320 Tuniham Road Orono. MN 55359 COPIES TO:Greg Sargent 320 Tumham Road Orono. MN 55359 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Conditional l!se Permit/Variance — _ _ ^ ^ w A • ■* DATE OF MEETING: 10/17/94 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Planning Commission recommended denial of a conditional use permit for a guest house apartment above the detached garage currently under construction. The Planning Commission recommended no other alterations of the proposed improvement in the expanded living space above the detached garage. Planning Commission noted that the resolution denying the conditional use permit/variance application would be an appropriate deed restriction to be filed on the chain of title. As for the need for a home occupation license, the Planning Commission found that the professional use of your residence was accessory to your professional activities and not the primary location. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any questions pertaining to the matters discussed above. Annlicants' next scheduled meeting is confimied at the City Council meeting ot November 14. 1994 Please note thal meetine starts at 7:30 p.m. A denial resolution ot the conditional use pemiit will he dratted prior to the meeting and sent to you for your review and comment. The resolution will be presented for Council's formal action at that meeting. 'AJ Ui i /;fA>.-. ^. Ri-:Qn<:sT for coi ^cil action DATE: Nove^^^/1 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Jeanne A Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1972 Daniel Radford, 3593 Crystal Place - Variance - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential requiring a 1/2 acre in area. E.xistina lot area = 8.715 s.f. (4.875 s.f. of lot area subject to hardcover controls). Brief Review of Application Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated October 10. 1994 for more background on this review. The applicant seeks a street setback variance for a 12'xl6.4 ’ three season porch. The e.xisting stoop/landing and stairs are located 25 ’ from the street lot line. The proposed three season porch will be 18 ’. The proposed structure will extend no closer to the street than the existing deck and stairs of the house to the immediate west ot the property. The applicant was asked why the addition could not be relocated to the rear or south side of structure. Applicant noted that the addition would have a major impact on natural lighting to the rear bedroom and living room area. He also noted drainage problems based on existing roof lines as all drainage is . ^signed to flow to street yard. The City has yet to receive negative comments from the adjacent neighbors. The applicant was also cautioned as to a need for a future lot coverage variance if a larger detached garage was proposed at some time. .Applicant was encouraged to amend the current application so that the lot coverage variance could be addressed in a comprehensive review ot the property. Applicant stated that at a minimum he would be addressing the need tor an ott street parking area and was not considering construction of the detached structure in the immediate future. Planning Commission cautioned that this may have an impact on a future variance review. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the street setback variance and conditioned approval on the following; 1 . L'pon application for building permit, applicant w'as to provide a landscape plan providing screening of proposed addition within the street yard. 2. Prior to the City issuing the building permit tor new construction, the tollowing was to be completed; A. Cleanup of rear yard where materials and equipment are stored. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 November 8. 1994 Zoning File #1972 B.Removal of deterioratins metal shed. 4. Per Section 12.05. Subd. 2 all e.Kterior construction including siding, roofing, doors, windows and finish shall be completed and present a finished appearance within twelve months of the start of construction. Applicant is placed on notice that lot coverage is already recorded at 1.010 s.f or 11.5% and that there is only 490 s.f of area for structural improvements allowed for this property. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission’s unanimous recommendation of approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. ch A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE ;1'1972 WTIEREAS, Daniel J. Radfo rd (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner ot the property located at j593 Crystal Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter ' City") and legally described as follows; Lot 11. Block 3. Navarre Heights, Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City tor a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction ot a 12 .k16.4 three season porch to be located 18’ from the street lot line instead of required 30 ’. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 2. The property is located in the LR-IC. Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring Ml acre in area. The property consists of 8.715 s.f. or 2 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 17. 1994, and recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variance based upon the following unique findings and hardships; A. A residence has existed on the property for over fifty years prior to current zoning standards. Page I of 5 B. If addition was placed to the rear of the structure, it would have a major impact on access to natural lighting to existing living areas of home. C. The existing residence is located 30 ’ from the street lot line and approximately 36 ’ from the actual traveled road of Crystal Place. D. The proposed addition will align with the existing deck and stair within the street yard of the property to the immediate west. E. The three season porch to be installed to the north side of the residence will have no visual impact upon the residence to the immediate east because of the location of mature year round plantings on the property. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do nn ap,''-- >..erally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City stall, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above Imdings. the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to .Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25. Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a 12 x16.4' three season porch addition to the north side ol the existing residence approving a 12" or 40^^ variance, subject to the following conditions; Pace 2 of 5 1.Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall either have completed or shall submit the following: A. Landscape plan providing screening for proposed addition within street vard. B. Removal of all materials and equipment stored in rear yard. C. Removal of metal shed within rear yard. Per Section 12.05. Subd. 2. applicant is hereby advised that all exterior construction including siding, roofing, doors, windows and finish shall be completed and present a finished appearance within twelve months of the start of construction. Per Section 10.03. Subd. 14 (C) of the Orono Municipal Code, applicant ’s improvements result in a total of 1.010 s.t. or 11.5% of structural improvements on this property. This property shall be limited to 490 s.t. ot additional structural improvements. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are penuissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 14. 1995). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understocxl and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himselt. his heirs, successors and assigns, herebs asrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain ot title ot the propeny . Page 3 of 5 1 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of November. 1994 ATTEST: Dorothv M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr.. Mavor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of November. 1994. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalt of the Citv. Notary Public Paee 4 of 5 r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) __ day of , 199 before me a NotaryOn this____________ Public within and for said county, personally appeared__________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared------------------------------------------------ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator October 10. 1994 SUBJECT: #1972 Daniel J. Radford. 3593 Crystal Place - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC Lake Shore Residential requiring 1/2 acre in area. Existing lot area = 8,715 s.f. Application: Street setback variance required for proposed 12’xl6.4’ three season porch Pertinent Ordinances A. B C. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total lot area = 8,715 s.f. Allowed = 1,500 s.f. or 17.2% minimum structural coverage allowed per code Proposed = 1,010 s.f. or 11.5% •liliSection 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover 500-1, area, (refer to Exhibit E) 500-1,000 ’ = 4,875 s.f. Allowed = 1,706 s.f. or 35% Existing = 804 s.f. or 16.5% Proposed = 1,096 s.f. or 22.4% Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Street setback variance Required = 30’ E.xisting = A. 27’ includes 3 ’ stoop or landing area B. 25’ includes landing and stairs Proposed = 18’ Variance = 12’ or 40% s.f. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Hardcover Fact Sheet E - Survey F - Floor Plan G - Elevation Zoning File #1972 October 10, 1994 Pace 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes installation of a 12’xl6’4" three season porch to the street or nonh side of existing residence. The existing stoop and stair are located 25’ rom street lot line. The proposed three season porch would be 18 ’. The house to the east is located sligh ‘'y behind front line of existing residence and is 10 ’+ from the shared lot line. The residence to the west is in line with the front line of the subject structure. Applicant’s residence is 14 ’ + from west lot line and the proposed addition will be 22’. The mature evergreen in the street yard will not be lost as a result of the construction. The rc! idence has been vacant for over nine years. The current owner and applicant is a retired contrac or and has slowly worked on the renovation of the structure over the summer months. Staff me* with the applicant on site and discussed the issue of future otf street parking as residence u not served by a driveway nor off street parking area. Note there is 610 s.f. of available hard-'over and there is adequate width within the west side yard to allow a minimum width driveway *o rear yard. Applicant did discuss his plans tor a future garage to the rear yard located out of the J'.ardcover zone (review Exhibit E) but note strucmral coverage facts above, applicant is already at 1 1.5% with proposed improvements with an additional 490 s.f. allowed for additional structural coverage. If a garage was to be installed on this property, a structural coverage variance would be required. Review Exhibit G, note change in roof line at northwest comer ot residence. The variance need not be addressed for this expansion as intensification of roof structure will occur within conforming street and side setbacks. Statement of Hardship Review Exhibit A. applicant notes minimal living space and enhancement of structure. Issues for Consideration 1. Would proposed improvement be consistent with development within immediate neighborhood? 2. Can three season porch be located so as to conform to setback standards, refer to Exhibits E and F? 3. As it is the intention of applicant to install a future garage, should applicant be advised to amend current application to include future garage that would require a lot coverage variance 'V? ij 1. ^ - 3. 4. 5. required SL'BMITTALS , ., ... „r.h. fMImrine =-f.'^«ion must he submitted bv Ihe application deadline dole in orjer L,r complelei SSfied Propeitv Owners List of owners within 150 ’ (you must obiam ^is list from - wm SDepartment of Finance A.603, Gov, Center. 34S.3271). Plat Map surveyor) and include hardcover reproducr’on. and oroposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade __Topographic su^ Iddition provide one (1) copy S'/i” x 11" for reproduction. ^ are propose ^ n elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8 ‘/:" x 11"). 5; 3 ^7anTddeI5irthis%plication, please auach a separate list of any other persons — you wish notified of this application. 9 __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE information required or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees ^ covered by original fee payment) Administrator, agrees to pay and certifies mat the and/or consultant expenses ^ ^est of his/her knowledge, information supplied is tiw and correct '^'*'e test o^nts n Applicant’s Signature Date O^^^S•l.R’S SIGNATURE aoDlication and furuher authorizes reasonable The owner hereby acknowledges and agree P conimi«:sion members, and CouncU entrv onto the property by City staff, i^sTquest. members for purposes of investigation and^nficaiion ot---- Date ^ L— uwncr b OI^IUILUIW T -------/■ \ r-.. .offices’5 davs before the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attcn advise the Building & Zoning Office of ,0 have an authorized agent anend in your place and to adv« this change prior to the meeting. X ■•f-RUN DATE OVIS/MI•ATCH OOS HCItCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LISTi'v■•i■ *• •MOP AOOfI OmEO HAHE TAXPAYEP MAflE/ADim sa 17-117-ES M 000100056 AOORESS UNASSIGNED HCLEOO CKTY REG RAIL AUTH DAKOTA RAIL INC 25 ADAMS ST N HUTCHINSON HN 55350^ PROP ADOR OiaCR NAMETAXPAYERHAME/AOm 56 17-117-25 3A 002502265 BLAINE AVE TIMOTHY G SMENSEN TIMOTHY G SNENSEN 2265 BLAINE AVE ORONO m 555T1Ip•A mm ADM OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 38 17>U7<23 AS 00S2 0S59S CRYSTAL PL f J HOSCHINX ETAL OANIEL J RADFORD 12A4 90TN ST EINVER eROVE HEIGHTS MN 55077^-t MOP AOOR ^ .C: OMNER NAME TAXPAYER ■£t:-'»«ME/AOOR -N f? r-<-. • '.V SO 17-117-2S AS OOS5 DS58D LIVINGSTON AVE H ANDERSON/V BEGIN-ANDERSON H ANDERSON/V BEGIN-ANDERSON S5B0 LIVINGSTON AVE MAYZATA m 55S91 r!. PROP AODR % OMNER NAMES' taxpayer UC' NAfC/AODR ?• ‘H- SB 17-117-ES AS 01A5 0S5B5 CRYSTAL PL EVELYN J LANGE EVELYN J LANGE S5B5 CRYSTAL PL MAYZATA m 55S91 REPORT NO. PIA3SA01 PAGE 8S8 17-117-2S 5A 002S 02255 BLAINE AVE H L 6AKKEN A H 1 BAKKEN HAROLD L BARKEN 20 2ND ST N E 81201 MPLS m 5SA1S 58 17-117-25 SA 002A02265 BLAINE AVE DCNAIO J FRETLANO DONALD J FRETLANO A9A0 VIKING OR 8SOO MPLS 55AS558 17-117-25 5A 002603600 LIVINGSTON AVE 0 E SHAN JR A J M SHAH PE»*4EY L SHAM 150 HOOD DUCK LA ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-25 AS 002805555 CRYSTAL PL DEAN YOUNG DEAN YOUNG 5555 CRYSTAL PLACE HAYZATA MN 5559138 17-117-25 A3 003303599 CRYSTAL PL HERSEL H FORESTER HERSEL FORESTER 3599 CRYSTAL PLACE HAY HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-2S AS OOSA03596 LIVINGSTON AVE HARVEY G REOER HARVEY 6 REOER 3598 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA MN S539138 17-117-23 AS 0135 02195 SHAOYNOOD RD JOHN H ANDERSON JOHN H ANDERSON 2195 SHADYNOOD RD HAYZATA tti 55391 38 17-117-23 AS 01S8 0S590 NORTHERN AVE LAHRENCE HUOERLE JOSEPH HUDERLE SS90 FtoRTHERN AVE HAYZATA MN 55S91 56 17-117-23 43 0150 03572 LIVINGSTON AVE MARK N A KAREN L CUFF MARK H A KAREN L CUFF 5572 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA HN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 005 00014 •* I _GV t-, .i.■ '4^V' .*r *V ' "'.'v'i *V'' ■Af'- % 'V ■ * *i\ r■i--MM wn ovis/t*iUTCN OOS HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»MERS LIST REPORT NO. PI455A01 PACE 9.vfiV.' ■• ••■ ' d^'■ fk1;!V-.- ‘ i ^ . ■ T;- i4: ' ». . ’Ai.v-.-V. '0«'.'\T'l '■•'.4^* L ■• T- •' MM- .;.lj •Ji'-S' if-r' i'5 .i- ? *"' 5^?; t ■* • I" I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURAH AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THtS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OF NY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF, OATI 'Pfii i^dx/J ■-0 '£•1:3D ;3C)X * »C' Tvlot ^?ifc(37)>70 s?k «(3«)? '7c 1 (39)9 i)0 j tr« *N< )6 »3: 5AH-N0- \ ^ 1 ^ ' >-i !v :c 5.! I . 8 ,>6~>r ?c‘!1 1 -t/: 40)-j'41) (g ArxX5C1 50 y 5C XS'O•<>50 u;-® « dz)'X U' i50Ol)50 "STlO7 3 ( 10)50*r>;vii *v»r'1?*( 119)14( )6) • •50505079 TryK.m3 =(7)(6)}0 K(?Z)LIVINGSTON AVC1» i 3^ j 3 »r>X -.5 0]1 ic 1 = ?e?: 1 T 5?- 0j 7??: ? 1 - 1(51)3 ; 5^>j( 49)(<87 i (47)(45I (44)-s (43) 1 ‘'•/...l-v 4 ■•,»1 ^5C !C !1 50 5C 5C X 50 X 50 50 [liri1^l-l?u*^'5 ; 1 1 ’S ' i*n 13 0 '- 1?-fC 19 i ^1 ^ 1 e“1 n? *r 3 '33J •; 55){^)3 K’5''/1 01^56)(«5' II ^ *,....:...r-'r• r •'h' ^1 «■1 • • 1II 5C * ;o j?X ’ X ' X 50 'I X I 5.X X 7C k)bu TT ^ 3 3 " .14 .t • 3 (•0) n? (69) .0? (68) 9 ? 50 50 "“so 3P 30 50 »r 3 3 "ir^ ^Tl) »rt 1 3 •S“ C?) «n r-J (73) i 3»o- (74) ir ;» ?0- (75) 5C X 5C X X • • • * 5C » 30 SO St ?3- (76) (77) (78) /. 30 5- (63) (62) LVHIC ^ *r»i ^ wS **“' '.‘V?T7 ^ 3d * ”1 4 “! 3 - lO'^li k io:)i »o'H ICO) • * i* 3C [ 50 ‘ !C /:* I ?■ I ?.• I I3)'«n *n 3, l:i .T 50^^ SCo- X X V :C- X X ' X X- X !iQ*n 50 55 1 I (69) (M) 3_ ^1 3l 3 (93)(94) 195) ? 5 (63) X X {)Q: sc K> W w k IIORELINE DR(H CGA I|’'n O V 4. •* ' 10 4'.' •^0 \ t40 -5, ;3, .• • ) -----------V -,;;i i:•i: ^ X \ ? ; :i to: 1 ox i: Sii:^::- r - « OCC NO •946165-'^ .........3*134 ‘33:4:5 ' %% -» 64 56 • - , • D 1 i 1 k « 1 • T-i'(74, V \ hardcover calculation wopxsheet SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) iTVT«mNO ^ A. House------------------- Leogdi /■r. /___ 0-75’75-250’25-500’ 1 \ X X Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ■ S.F. ■ S.F. S.F. TOTAL H.ARDCOVER IN ZONE total PRC^^R^ area in zone ^ ^ 100 =4 0-4^ S.F S.F. % ppnPOSKP hardcover IN ZQj^ A. House -------- Leogch X X X S.F. f (7^ S.F.y s F. B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic S(» A B \ • G. Other X X X X X total hardcover in zone total property area in zone X 100 A ® S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 4e S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SP- ,,I i S.F. A ■ S.F. B ' % "I ^ 1 i f i i t 1 ?• 'i- I t ! •, J I ^. \ 1 I L i 1.11 I 7 In I i ( ••' I r:ill I ((■ M« <>'I •>, I l' 1 j / ■ .• I \’c i* i'i '*,» I (if: REQtTST FOR COUNCIL ACTION f * n/ « DATE: Noveml^f^i^l^ 4 ;o,04 ITEM NO;o.: f Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: <1^1976 Don Gamble, 4680 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution Zoning District: RR-IA, 5 acre minimum lot density Total area of property = 13.38 acres of dry land Additional Exhibits I - Hennepin County DOT Letter of October 12, 1994 Brief Review of Application For more background on this review, please refer to the attached staff memo dated October 7. 1994. The .subdivision 'ipplication involves a division of the 13.3 acre outlet that remains of the former Ski Tonka property. The lot area standard has been met. A lot width variance must be granted to both lots as the front/street yards per code are designated at Bayside Road. The code requires 300 ’ of lot width to the rear of the front yard (100 ’). The existing corridor serving Lot 1 is 179 ’ and the corridor to Lot 2 is 237 ’. Septic testing confirms there is adequate treatment area for both the primary and alternate site on both lots. The fonner wells that served the Ski Tonka operation have not been designated on the survey. It is not clear whether the wells are to serve the new residential development. Any well to be used in the future must be located so that adequate separation is provided from proposed septic sites. The City will also ask for confirmation that the wells to be abandoned have been abandoned per State and County standards. The City Engineer has approved access off McCulley Road for Block 1 . Review Exhibit I. The County would approve accesses off of Bayside Road for both lots. In addition, the County asks for an additional 7 ’ of right-of-way for County Road 84 commencing at the Intersection of McCulley Road in an easterly direction for 40’. The additional right-of-way would be required to provide a turn lane at the intersection. John Gerhardson has approved the request for the additional 7 ’ of right-of-way for the 40 ’ distance. The Planning Commission noted concern with the existing 39 ’ platted corridor within Lot 1 that provides access to the Luce Line. Planning Commission noted that since the developer has not provided plans for the creation of a defined trail that the current approval be based on the trail being installed on existing grade covered with wood chips. Any future modification of this plan must be approved by the City. f! I Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 November 8. 1994 Zoning File n916 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the two lot subdivision as proposed. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of that recommendation which nov/ has been amended to include a request by the County for the additional T of right-of-way and requirement that applicant locate existing wells on property and to advise which of the wells are to remain to serve future residential development prior to final plat approval. The City will ask for written confirmation from developer that all wells to be abandoned have been legally abandoned per State and County regulations prior to final plat approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4680 BAYSIDE - FILE NO. 1976 WHEREAS, Don P. Gamble. Ill and Quatro Oil Ventures, Inc. (hereinafter "llw subdividers ”), on September 23, 1994. filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: Outlot C. Painters Creek, according to the plat on file in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 17. 1994 at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on November 14, 1994, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdividers, noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IA Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 5 acres of dry buildable land within each newly created lot. The property consists of 13.38 acres of dry lands. Lot 1 consists of 6.8 acres and Lot 2 consists of 6.51 acres. The lots do not meet the required lot width of 300' to the rear of the l(X)' street/front setback. The Planning Commission approved the width variances based on the following unique findings and hardships: a.The e.xisting parcel is configured such that Lot 2 can only achieve access via a 237’ platted corridor. Page 1 of 5 4. 5. b. c. d. Per Section 10.02, Definition 36 that defines a front lot line for a comer lot, the front lot line for Lot 1 must be defined at County Road 84 where the existing platted corridor measures only 179 ’. Lot 1 would not require a lot width variance if the front/street yard was defined along McCulley Road where there is some 745 lineal feet. Access for Lot 1 will be provided along McCulley Road and yet the code would require that the front/street yard be defined at Bayside Road. 3. Both lots have adequate and suitable soils for on-site treatment facilities. Each lot has been approved for access either at Bayside/County Road 84 or McCulley Road. Each lot can be developed without the need for granting setback variances for residential construction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Don P. Gamble, III and Quatro Oil Ventures, Inc. per plat drawings by Raymond A. Prasch, a licensed survey of Lot Surveys Company, Inc. dated 9-22-94, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of an additional 7 ’ of right-of-way for future improvements at the intersection of County Road 84 and McCulley Road. The 7 ’ of additional right- of-way shall extend for 40’ starting at the intersection of McCulley Road and County Road 84 and run easterly along County Road 84. 2.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10’ along the perimeter boundary of the properties and 5 ’ along the shared lot lines. 3. All residential construction shall meet required setbacks of RR-1A zoning district as follows: 100’ front and rear setback 50 ’ side setback. Page 2 of 5 -r- ♦-■ P I 4. Developer to obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the bam on Lot 2 to be completed prior to final plat approval. 5 Upon application for building permits for Lots 1 and 2. future owner shall provide detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans for constniction of driveways to serve new building sites. The City Engineer must approve grading plans for driveway construction before building permits can be issued. 6 An access permit must be approved by the Public Works Director if access to Lot 1 shall be achieved via McCulley Road. If access is to be achieved via Bayside, a Hennepin County DOT permit is required. These permits must be approved before a building permit can be issued. 7 Prior to final plat approval, subdivider is responsible for locating existing wells and to confirm which well shall remain to serve future residential construction. Any well to be abandoned must be permitted by appropriate State and County agencies. The subdivider must provide written confirmation that wells have been legally abandoned prior to final plat approval. 8 Future access to Luce Line Trail for Lot 1 has been approved as a trail constructed on existing grade and to be covered with wood chips. Any changes in this approved plan must be reviewed by the City. 9. Payment of a park dedication fee prior to final plat approval. The City Assessor shall be asked to determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land. The park dedication fee shall be based on 8% of that value. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the secoixl and fourth Mondays o the month. These submittals are as follows: 1 Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (with one copy for the City records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1“ = 200’. Drawing to include: Page 3 of 5 2. A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot Surveys Company, Inc. dated September 27, 1994. B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" as noted in Item 2 above. C. Dedication of additional T of right-of-way for County Road 84 as noted in Item 1 above. D. Naming of plat. Legal documents required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. If appropriate, written confirmation that wells to be abandoned have ^n abandoned per State and County standards. The subdivider shall confirm location of existing wells to remain to serve future residential construction with On-Site Septic Manager, Stephen Weckman. D. Subdivider shall obtain demolition permit for removal of bam on Lot 2. Fees to be paid: Total due: S250.00* A. Final plat fee = $175.00 B. Legal review and filing fees for subdivision = $75.00. * City Assessor to determine the fair market value of undeveloped property. park fee shall be based on 8% of that value. Such payment must be made prior to final plat approval. Applicant will be advised of determination of the parK dedication fee as soon as the City Assessor makes his report to the City. Page 4 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 14th day of November, 1994. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of November. 1994 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. HaHin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said uistniment was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 TO:Chair Schcoeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:October 7, 1994 SUBJECT: #1976 Don Gamble. 4680 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision ■ Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA, 5 acre minimum lot lone. Total area 13.38 acres dry. Pertinent Ordinances: Chapter 11, Class III Subdivision Section 10.27. Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IA Lot Standards (refer to staffs sketch. Exhibit F). Section 10.02, Definition 35 - Comer Lot (refer to Exhibit F). Section 10.02, Definition 36 - Front Lot Line (refer to Exhibit F). Section 10.02, Definition 40 - Rear Lot Line (refer to Exhibit F). A. B. C. D. E. List of Exhibits A ■ Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Gustafson Letter E - Weckman Memo F - Staffs Sketch of Building Envelope G - School District Boundary Map H - Preliminary Plan Review of Application pro^^'r^"* ThTpTintfr! C^e^planUd^eri^^^^^^^^^ the immediate Zoning File #1976 October 7. 1994 Page 2 the Dublic street Lot widtli at the Bayside lot line is only a 179’ at the 100 setback. Lot 2 has an unusual shape with an access corridor at Bayside at 237’. Refer to your prelminary plans, note the typical lot and building envelope defined on that survey is incorrect. This is a 5 acre zone not 2 acre. The front and rear setbacks are 100’ and the side 50 Note proposed building site shown on Lot 2 does not conform to required rear yard setback. Structure must be moved 60’ south to conform to the 100’ setback. Staff has had preliminaiy discussions with Doug Mattson of the Hennepin County Department of Transportation who advises that they would approve accesses to both lots via Bayside Road because McCulley Road receives far more traffic than County Road 84. Mattson o^e again advised staff of the County ’s desire to have the City take over County Road 84. Members may remember in the early review of the K-P Properties subdivision to the immediate south, the City did not intend to grant additional right-of-way for Bayside Road. Martin possibility of graLng additional right-of-way at the intersection of bounty Road 84 a^ McCulley for a future upgrading and defining of a turn lane onto McCulley Road, reviewed the accesses to the proposed lots with the City Engineer. Gustafson would approve access off of McCulley Road if fiiture owner so desires. Mattson as well as Gusufson report that access to Lot 2 would have to be at the very western boundary at Baystde because of location of the crest of the hill. Weekman s memo. Exhibit E. conftrms suitable soils for on-site septic Weekman s memo did not note a tteed to stake off the tested sepuc sites but C^^ the septic sites be staked off prior to any land alteration. There were wells on the previous ski operation. Applicant should provide a status report on whether the wells have been appropriately sealed and if any are intended for fiiture residential use. Wells located within Lot I have not been shown on preliminary plans. If a well is to be used, the location must s own SO that Weekman can confirm required 75 ’ setback. A bam on Lot 2 has not been shown on the preliminary survey. The bam is old and should be demolished as a condition of subdivision approval. Gustafson asked for detailed grading and drainage plans and development of driwways •« building sites. These plans must be submitted upon application for buiMuig pern enS s approval. Doug Maitson of Hennepin County DOT has advised that they will submit a iener before Planning Commission ’s public hearing. Members will receive copies either in a later submittal or at your meeting. The best way to visit this site is at the existing gravel driveway that currently serves proposed Lot 2 at Bayside Road, review staff’s sketch. Exhibit F. Park and view the beautiful vistas to the north. Zoning File #1976 October 7, 1994 Pace 3 Planning Commission Recommendation To approve the two lot subdivision application of Don P. Gamble. Ill and Quatro Oil Ventures Inc., the rural property located at 4680 Bayside Road, finding that the subdivision meets all requirements of the subdivision regulations and septic code and grants a lot width variance for both parcels based on the findings noted above. Approval of the two lot subdivision is based on the following conditions: 1. Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10 ’ along the perimeter boundary of the properties and 5’ along the shared lot lines. 2. Possible dedication of additional right-of-way at Bayside/County Road 84 intersection. County’s request is to be reviewed by both staff and City Engineer. 3. All construction shall meet required setbacks of RR-IA zone as follows: 100 front and rear and 50 ’ side. 4. Developer to obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the barn on Lot 2 prior to final plat approval. 5. Upon application for building permits for Lots 1 and 2, future owner shall provide detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans for construction of driveways to serv'c new building sites, grading plans must be approved by the City Engineer before a building permit can be issued. 6. An access permit must be approved by Public Works Director if access to Lot 1 shall be via McCuMey Road. If access is to be achieved via Bayside. a County permit is required. These permits must be approved before a building permit can be issued. 7. Payment of a park dedication fee prior to final plat approval. The City Assessor to review the fair market value of the unde\’eloped land. The park dedication fee shall be based upon 8% of that value. 8 Applicant has not made payment for the septic review of the preliminary plat. The City shall ask for additional fee of $100.00 ($50.00 per rural lot) to cover all septic review. This fee must be paid before plat can be submitted to the Council for preliminary approval. J ‘ . / CITY OP ORONO “ SUBDIVISION PROPERTY LOCATION S'0 AW ^ ^ te Address Identification Number (P.I.D.) A- • W A f - ' W » *u •♦U* _ . kte •- •.. >-• ’ » .••t- w-te*V'w VV'wv property Please check one - Property j21i\S235^^o .-uw-v U f 4»kl% • » ♦ • . . . . .v»a ^w'v'«v • U *VA • w abstract or 7^ - torrens? • fcT ” * * *• • ^ w • ft • • # ^• • • f*f»M • wy V • fc *. »*» •’ *» » ^ • *•»’ .* ^ w •t V 1 *•'- u’ V u % V* a *' V A * * w' — ^ "“Z - I r T- ””"• ^ ^yT^ ci^yi_SMiiiZiSh- ZiP*S5Sll—_ ^ ___________________________________________________________________ —————— ' 1 <-««♦“7 Phone (home)- --- - - - - - -ONNER (if different than applxcan ) l-^O f\i n^>.^..r^X^Phone (work)J55SL-J2=^2^ Kk^V<^ Zip;Njune * citvsAddress: i/’—VAav>.--X'^ayy-— (attach Ixst It more than _ _ _ ““;SSb^f°?ax parcels Development Size l Pj^esant Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total# all parcels yC__ Residential; no. of units Other (specify)--------------- A3lS \ Present Zoning District proposal Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: pjpQposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) \a21 i Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per /5_ Acres '2?n^nrXD sq Feet Dry Bui Residential — Other (specify) StNI BY:C=nTrCH e: 2 3 3 : S16 Fes • - ; . ; • 2 :^ W m w m ^ ^ SE= 23 iCiC? • A -r • : a-23-si :V::2AM : 4753475 rr j CHIMIM MATKiaAL NBCBSSA&Y FOR COMPLBTB PRBLIMlHART' i^PLICATION Codipltttttd Application Fom PraXininary Plat information on Certlficata of Survay. Certified Proparty Owners List of owners within 350* (you muat obtain this list from Hexmapin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 34<-3271). As< an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of Any other persons you wish notified of this application. irtiflcation by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is snplete. ming Official*# Signature Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Payment of feea (park fees, filing fee» sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion* Easements^ Covenanted etc. Developera Agreement and Letter of Credit. iiftlfleatlon by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete, ining Official's Signature Sketch Plan Review (Class if II a III) ( Subdivision of a tot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I * II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class ill i all non—residential) Final Plat Review (Class HI) #;Plus sny legal or engineering charges) Renewsl of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Sxibdlvision Application $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 ♦ 25.00/Lot 175.00 150.00 100.00 ?pllcant's Signature yner'si SignatH^ Date D.t. °i-23-1^ fflce fof this I change prior to the meeting. mm Mn o«/ism•ATCN OM NCMCPIN COUNTY MOPCRTY INfOMUTION SVSTCN niOPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI«IS401 PAGE 15»•OtCR NANI TANPAVIR Wm/AOOR M-117-EA 11 0005 CO RO NO 19 OARY 0 0 THERESA A REXERSEN OARV 0 A THERESA A REXERSEN 4005 CO M 19 NAPLE PUXN W« »5S59 50 OA-117-25 22 0005 00100 NORTH SHORE OR N DAVXO I MHXn ET AL FREDERICK C IMITE 14195 PAULS OR ROGERS MN 55574 50 04-I17-25 22 0007 04445 OAYSXOE RO X T A N L GEPFRE IRVIN T 6EPFRE 4445 OAYSIOE tiO HAPLE PLAIN Mt S5559- OM«R NAME : TAXPAYER* NAME/AOOR SO 04-1I7-2S 22 000( 04445 OAYSIOE RO R 0 0 N N OLSON ROOERT O OLSON 5010 HILLSOQRO AVE N MPLS m 55420 50 Sl*110-25 55 0005 04440 OAYSIOE RO 0 A N CUFF OOOOIE A NEVA CUFF 4440 OAYSIOE RO NAPLE PLAIN tti 55559 50 51-110-25 55 04720 OAYSIOE RO 0 PETER ACHEY ETAL HR O PETER ACHEY ROUTE 2 OOK 000 HAPLE PUIN Itt 55559TANFmftJ * ^ «•so SI-110-25 55 0007 04740 OAYSXOE RO L VOOERST A 0 OUM 0 OUMN A I YOGERST 4740 OAYSIOE RO HAPLE PLAIN m 55559 50 51-110-25 55 0000 00050 AOORESS UNASSXGNEO PAINTERS CREEK HOHEOMCRS PAINTERS CREEK HQHEOMNERS .;/0 CRAIG PASSON 100 LUCE LINE RXOGE HAPLE PLAIN (04 55559 50 51-110-25 55 0009 00050 AOORESS UNASSXGNEO PAINTERS CREEK HOHEOMCRS PAINTERS CREEK HOHEOMCRS C/0 CRAIG PASSON 100 LUCE LINE RXOGE HAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 .1 tlx 50 S1-110-2S SS 0010 00050 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO IRVIN E OERGSAGEL ET AL i TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR t.. t. GUARTO INC 1424 HARHON PL 0209 HPU m SS40S SO 51-110-2S S5 0011 00050 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO 0 R LANGE A J 0 OURRELL ^ ORUCE R LANGE SUITE 415 55 N JACKSON OLVD CHICAGO IL 40404 SO S1-I10-2S 54 0005 00025 LUCE LINE RIOGE C H HATTSTROM A V A HATTSTRQN CURTIS H HATTSTROM 25 LUCE LINE RIDGE HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559 , 1 ■y 1V PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO S1-110-2S 54 0004 00045 LUCE LINE RIOGE J R HOLM A J R HOLM JAMES R A JAYNE K HOLM 45 LUCE LINE RIOGE NAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 50 S1-110-2S 54 0005 00005 LUCE. LINE RIDGE 0 Y A C P CHAFFEE ORISON Y/CASSANORA P CHAFFEE 05 LUCE LINE RXbCE HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559 5» 51-110-25 S4 0015 Mn»tO iJWRESS UNASSIGNEO I'AimtNS CREEK HOHEOMCRS PAINTERS CREEK HOHEOMCRS C/0 CRAIG PASSON 100 LUCE LINE RIOGE HAPLE PLAIN tti 55559 1 4 % PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER . •NAME/AOOR 70 S4-110-24 44 0007 00150 NCCULLEY RO P A 0 SHERIDAN PHIUIP A SUSAN SHERIDAN in HCCUILEY RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 70 S4-110-24 44 0009 00007 NCCULLEY RD LARRY A SUSAN VENSEL LARRY A SUSAN VENSEL 07 NCCULLEY RO NAPLE PUXN MN 55559 TOTAL OATCH 005 00017 tA*-' A ! ‘‘V. ,'4 MM MTt 99/l$/n' PATCH NCMCTIN COUNTY mOACIITV XNFOWttTXON SYSTCN mOACRTY OMCKS LXST RCKMT NO. n«SSA01 TAGE Ui-♦i•a-Vr•f•• ' Yrv m!'' ■ h‘:rt" •' i n • 1.: ■ -• ! tv ^ ; mm- ■V/ Jv- .1^ "S X CCRTXFV TNAT TW FACTS HIFRESCNTID AAC AN ACCURATt AND TRUI RCraCSCNTATXON OF XNFOAMATXON AS XT AFFCAAS TNXS DATA ON TH| AICOAOS OF TNC NCMCFXN COUNTY OEFAATNENT OF FAOFEATY TAXATION* TO THC MST OF NY KNONlCOOE AND PCLXCF. DATA r •— I Bonestroo Roscne AnderllkA Associates Cnglnttrs A Archittcts October 6, 1994 CTO Q •!idet^ w lettrfL pc*.eitpr c maw ; iorvAA WA*t I Pt 0-Arr f coot, T^C'TAI f NOfffc ■m<rO ktiu%c*(r »f SbMTv V fSTW*. c^A *SAf^ Corfmfjn: A UMtm. ^1. W A. CMV\ Pr »aoM • pr •xrsmw «cMr. a# 9««M O lomma Pf AeatAC luitfA Af A A ACMWPfl. P| Mif« A NAniAfl Pf y iiuvwrv Pi >tf « Piw. Pf. 7««omAf • An^tnoA. AIA OOAM C Pj. A. S)M PL ■^Mtnc i P.|. itnjff MAfUntA Pf MCPMI P fAWk Pf A^m M. a i£ pwi/ %«noPk PE VAfAi? C gffw Pi ..Amn ■ PI •tnr & AnoKP. PI k«A 1 ^MfAPH. PE P /M^WPWPi PI MAfAi M Pi. Me#« A SMI Pf. OAry W MVMiPr PaMIGmaw AIA. DawJ IPpirgix Pi A Im fcPPME P| PPM i Ctfwvl Pf MlftO VM P| \%ift i .frv « Pf. I Cr|p«i P« f«v«% L Wkmm PL qa^ a cilflM. p; P PC Mn t Pf SaiaN* j ipAcn. PE SPfMA O G^IIMP. Pi CfCPf OMie Pi PtipG PI jotfiPQmm Pf CPlPNA C/tl10A UOM. PIWPIM MfWM OdoA ■OlVEPTON A ,i» Ms. Jeanne A. Mebusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Ciystal Bay» Minnesota 55323 Re: Bayside Hills File No. 139-1976 S % Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the Bayside Hills subdivision. The property is located north of Bayside Road (County Road No. 84) and east of McCully Road in the southwest quarter of Section 31. The subdivision is acceptable from an engineering standpoint, however more information should be provided at this time. The location of the driveway access for each of the two lots should be determined and a grading plan & erosion control plan should be prepared. Lot 1 has a potential access onto either Bayside Road or McCully Road. In either case, the access should be at least 150 feet from the intersection. The access for Lot 2 is more restrictive as it is at the top of a hill. We recommend it be located within 5 feet of the west lot line due to poor site distance in any other location. Any access onto Bayside Road must be reviewed and approved by Hennepin County. Hennepin County will likely require at least 42 feet of right-of-way for Bayside Road, an additional 9 feet of right-of-way should be provided. Drainage and utility easements will be required 5 feet wide along all lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of-ways. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours veiy truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 M%st Hlqhway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 »«ff-S5sr^ Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator FROM: Stephen Weckman. On-Site Systems Manager DATE:October 4, 1994 SUBJECT: Application #1976 Don E. Gamble III, Preliminary Subdivision - Septic Review The applicant proposes a two lot subdivision requiring primary and alternate drainfield sites for each lot. Soil testing has been submitted and approved for primary and alternate sites on each lot. All drainfield sites meet City and State standards. Some errors have been made regarding the drainfield sizes and locations on the survey . The secondary septic site on Lot 2 should be located (urther east and north of the site indicated on the survey. Currently the drainfield site has been located across the entrance d to the old Ski Tonka facility. Also, each drainfield site will be approximately 40 ’xl00 ’ in area rather than the various dimensions of the sites shown on the survey. These mapping discrepancies do not affect any lot line setbacks or interfere with the proposed house locations on either lot. Based on the above information. I would recommend approval. FECT VAIVS ROAD p-\ »N;C. r “ r ^ ..--1 ■J - » *♦ ' •#• i»., **'V ‘j^*^’*'/'- *‘:,‘ /V--/VHennepin County___________________________^ An Equal Oppi^rtunitv Employer i.'V*^ ^ V,:;-%-•/ October 12. 1994 Jeanne A. Habusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, HN 55323-0066 RE: Proposed Plat - Bayside Hills CSAH 84, northeast quadrant CSAH 84 and McCulley Road Section 31, Township 118, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 2188 Review and Recommendations Dear Ns. Habusth: Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: • For future improvements to the CSAH 84 McCulley Road intersection, the developer should dedicate an additional 7 feet of right of way for a total of 40 feet of right of way from and along the CSAH 84 centerline. • The developer must have an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any access construction to CSAH 84. The developer can contact Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548 for general access requirements, reaction to developer proposed location of curb cuts, and entrance permit forms. • All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for utility permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way, disturbed during construction. Department of Public Works 320 Wiishini^ton Avenue South Hopkins. Minnesota 55343-8468 (612) 930-2670 FAX;(612) 930-2513 TDD:(612) 930-2696 r<ipiT i CCl'fmi meetingrequest for council action .\’GV 4 ]QQ4DATE, IWmmITEM NO,Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:Zonine District: LR-IB. Lakeshore ResMeraial requiring 1 acre in area. Area of progeny 74,600 s.f. or 1.7 acres. Additional Exhibits Q - DNR Letter, Ceil Strauss R - 10/24/94 Letter of Raymond & Ruth Hoffman S - Planning Commission Action Notice Brief Review of Application Annlicams seek approval of 9T encroachment of the average lakeshore settack The mw resMence strucmre^will be placed approximately at the same lakeshore setba^ of the existing two sto>y seasonal cabin that has existed on the property for over fifty years. The new V^n exreiri wM«rly to the area occupied by detached garage. Steep slopes to the west of tte dSlaregJ^^Sui^ere restrictions on the building envelope. If the structure was m coni^ to .TavUe lakeshore setback line, major cuts into the steeper elevauons would be required along with the removal of several mature trees. architect, they now agree to the proposed location, review Exhibit . In a 5 ■> vote the Planning Commission recommended approval of the 97 verage irshTre srack'line. subject to applicants ’ represenutives meeting " in an'auempt to either seek approval of the Ihe would meet the required 75’ lakeshore setback as well and at the lakeshore. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the tind.ngs conditions of the Planning Commission ’s recommendation of approval. i i: i f , i, I A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) FILE nWll WHEREAS, Lawrence B. Dorr and Marilyn A. Dorr (hereinafter "the applicants ”) are owners of the propert) located at 980 Tonkawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter ’ City ") and legally descnbed as follows: Refer to Exhibit A attached. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter ’the property ”); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a ' ariance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 (B) to permit construction of i new residence to be located 97’ in front of the average lakeshore setback line where no such encroachment is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1977. The property is located in the LR-IB. Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. The property consists of 74.600 s.f. or 1.7 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission rev iewed this application on October 17, 1994. and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A.Two story seasonal cabin has existed at the same lakeshore setback a:- the proposed structure. Page 1 of 6 B. Sleeper elevations and mature plantings to the immediate west of the proposed building site would be severely impacted if the structure was to meet the required average lakeshore setback. C. The proposed structure will be located out of the bluff impact zone at the lakeshore and also meet the 75 ’ lakeshore setback. D. The neighbor to the immediate north submitted a lener approving the proposed location. 4. The City received a letter dated October 24, 1994 from Mr. and Mrs. Raymond J. Hoffman at 1000 Tonkawa Road, the owners to the immediate south of the subject property, noting approval of the proposed location of the residence. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would rot merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty ; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby crams a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to peiroit construction of a new residence to the located 97 ’ on to the average lakeshore setback line. subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 6 i 1. 3. 4. As a result of the proposed improvements, hardcover for this property is recorded as follows: A. 0-75 ’ setback area = 0 s.f. B 75-250 ’ setback area = 5,725 s.f. or 25% C. 250-500 ’ setback area = 2,400 s.f. or 9.23% 500-1,000’ setback area = 1,200 s.f. or 7.32%. Upon application for a building permit, applicants shall provide a survey locating pro|V:.ed structure along with detailed grading and drainage plans for new construction. Applicants are hereby advised that a demolition permit is required for the removal of the existing cabin and detached garage. Authorities granted by this variance lun with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 14, 1995). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereoy agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain ot title ot the property. Page 3 of 6 1 I f iwu'r ;• r- Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of November. 1994 ATTEST Dorolhy M. Hailin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this November 1994 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Halim, Mayor & City City of Oro^'Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrumem was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 t ' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) r i On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared_______________________________ _______________________known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Ii NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public withinand for said county, personally appeared_______________________________ _______________________known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 6 * 1H* A I .V. t » 1 r . > • * I ■ » • I * ‘ I « M» • % I ( « ■ . M •- * 1 • I • ■ I I TO: DATE: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. Citv Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator October 11. 1994 SUBJECT: #1977 Lawrence and Marilyn Dorr. 980 Tonkawa Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB. Lakeshore residential requiring 1 acre in area. Property consists of 74.600 s.f. or 1.7 acres. Application: Applicants seek approval of an average lakeshore setback variance to allow construction of a new residence on the property that currently sustains a seasonal two story cabin. The following ordinances are peninent for this review: Section 10.22. Subd. I (B) - Average lakeshore setback variance. Proposed structure will encroach 97’ in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Section 10.22. Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. 75-250 ’ setback area = 22.900 s.f. Allowed = 5.725 s.f. Proposed = 5.725 s.f. or 25% No variances required. Section 10.03. Subd. 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage. Allowed = 7,190 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 3,303 s.f. or 4.4%. List of Exhibits A • Application B • Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Existing Survey F - Proposed Survt,. G - Map Locating Areas of Cross Section H - AB Cross Section I - CD Cross Section Jl-4 -Hardcover Fact Sheets K - Elevations L - Floor Plans Zoning File #1977 October 11. 1994 Page 2 M - Hoffman Letter 10/7/94 N - House Profile O - Second Level Floor Plan - Potential Guest Apartme.»t p - Lerr^ Description of Request Applicants propose the construction of a new year round residence to be placed behM ^ front line of the exisfrng seasonal cabin extending to the detached garage to the west of the seasonal cabin Structure has been located on the property in an anempt to munmize excavatiom of steeper elevations to the west resulting in the loss of several mature trees. Review ^ibit F. ^e slr^ture will be located out of the bluff impact zone and 75' lakeshore setback area. Structure will be approximately 93’ from the 929.4 elevation at the structure s closest projection to the lake. Gaffron completed an analysis of the topography of the area to deteimine the Presence of bluffs (Exhibits G H and I). Staff has also reviewed this information with Ceil Strauss of the DNR^ She concurs that the only bluff area on this property is the bank immediately adjacent to the shoreline. She confirms upon review of the staffs analysis information that steeper elevations to the west would not be part of a bluff but area is subject to the special controls dealing with development within steep slopes. Review Exhibit N. note the peak height of the structure will be ?0’ above existing grade at approximately the 955 elevation. The grade level of house to the south is at the 980 elevaliom Review Exhibit M, the neighboring properly owner to the south voices major concern with th new home being placed within the present footprint advising that the current seasonal T. 19 20*^al height blocks certL views of the lake. They ask that the house ^ ^aced ac the average bkeshore setback line so as to minimize any '^npact u^n tteir Note that homes recently constructed within the immediate neighborhood wer . meet the average lakeshore setback line. They prefer that the proposed the immediate north also be required to meet the average lakeshore setback line. The "^igh^ asks that since they are unable to attend the meeting on the 17th that you table all action on profxlLl Tme str^Icture is not to meet the average lakeshore setback requirement. Review Exhibit O. the second level fioor plan reveals a potential guest apartmen* over the garage. Although the area adjacent to the silting area is labeled wet bar and not of cooking surface), applicants should advised of future use to determine permit will be necessary. The only access to area is via the second floor exercise room. Zoning File #1977 October 11. 1994 Page 3Options of Action Available to Applicants A If applicants choose to place the house at the average lakeshore setback line, the applicants need not proceed with the variance review -s the only variance required for this proposal is the average lakeshore setback; or If applicants feel they can work with the owner to the south in an attempt to minimize the visual impact of the structure. Planning Commission may vote to uble the application until the Hoffmans can be present at the November meeting of the Planning Commission. I ( H11 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIOa/JL Initial Application Fee $200.00 / / ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $1(X).00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 .After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) r w • V * - * w • w - ' I, I V'VVV W* •* W* u ' V - • *i.U •- V . • PROPERTY DEFORMATION Site Address 980 tonkawa road Properi)' Identification Number (P.I.D.) 38 08-117-23-12 oooi Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired 8.89___________________________________(monih/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacem parcels of land. Present use of property: XX residential ___other (specify) Zoning District:_______lr -ib_______________________ APPLICANT Name Lawrence & marilyn dorr Phone(hoine) 818-952-1281 Phone(work) ___ Address: ^335 WOODLEIGH LANE Citv: LA CANADA OWNER (if different than applicant) Name (same as above ) FLINTRIDGE, CA Phone(home)__ Phone (work)___ Zip: 91011 Address:City:Zip:_ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request indetail:____ Estimated Construction Cost $ 300,000,00 SEE ATTACHED (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear XX Average Lakesbore Other (.specify') HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:____________________________________ SEE ATTACHED (attach additional sheets if necessary) required submittals ^11 th« infftrmation must be submitted by the aPPBcation de:idHii^ in order fnr vmir aDif|8ratioii to be considered compief**^ 1. mm • 3. 4. Completed Application Form — Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you muse obtiir Jus list from Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603. Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). ----Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover ----calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/6” x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existmg grade — are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/^" .x 11" for reproduction.^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/^" x 11'). ----List of the 'egal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the ----property This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by Cicy staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember tlu« yom annilffftinn is not complete if the aboye informa^lftti has not been ihelWtteiL APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE ^ w u The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by ^hc Zoi^g Admimstrator. agrees to pay additional fees (snff time not covered by and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and cemfies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. 5. 6. -y / . 8. 9. App'leant’s Signature Date members for purposes qf^Ky^tigation ai^ v^ficaiion of this request. DateOwner’s Signatui Applicant must ha« all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Ap“pSSnu“hl ^^r,U riew t^togs of this change prior to the meeting. * r y/ PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE FOR DR. LAWRENCE D. & 'LVRILYN A. DORR 980 TONKAWA ROAD ORONO, MINNESOTA addendum to variance application SUPPORTING NARRATIVE Requested is a permitted variance to the average lakeshore setback. Thi. proposal involves remo-ing the existing house on the property ^ » _____ incation The new structure will be no closer to the ItoTthe Uud[ng with the approximate closest distance to the lake being 93’ s'eet at the northwest comer of the house. The lot rises approximately 25’ above the lake to a plateau on whch the ^ now sits and on which the new house is proposed to be built, hrom that pint the lot steeply rises away from the lake. The difficulty, then, in locating a house on this lot stems from the steeply sloping grades in areas other than the existing building site. For this reason the Owners respectfully request approval to rebuild their new home in the present location of the existing house. r RUN DATE 07/20/94 HEtfJEPIM rc*.“-'iY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWTERS LIST REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 52BATCH 010PROP ADDR OFtTER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 08-117-23 12 000100980 TONKANA RD L 0 DORR/M A DORR TRUSTEES LAWRENCE & MARILYN DORR 4335 HOOOLEIGH, FLINTRIDGE LACATtADA CA 91011PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 08-117-23 12 000501000 TOTJKAWA RO R J HOFFMAN ETAL RAYMOND J HOFFMAN 1000 TONKANA RO LONG LAKE MN 55356PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 08-117-23 21 007600985 TUTKAWA RO GABRIEL E JABBOUR GABRIEL E JABBOUR 21 UNIVERSITY AVh N E MPLS FM 55413 n o’. r' 38 08-117-23 12 000200970 TONKAWA RO0 4 M BOOTHDAVID 4 MARILYN BOOTH970 TONKAWA ROLONG LAKE FW 55356 38 08-:.17-23 12 000300960 TOFFKAFtA RD W G 4 L J CORNELIUS WILLIAM G CORNELIUS LORI J CORNELIUS 960 TOtTKAWA RO OROFFO FtF 5535650 08-117-23 13 001401020 TOtWAWA RO DOUGLAS J WILLIAMS DOUGLAS J WILLIAMS 1020 TOFFKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 08-117-23 21 001500975 TOFFKAWA ROA J FARAS 4 M K TAVEGGIAANTHOF4Y J FARAS975 TONKAWA ROLONG LAKE MN 55356 'I "^,3)ViX'■128 08-117-23 24 000201015 TONKAWA RO DANIEL C 4 RUTH M PARTEN DANIEL C 4 RUTH M PARTEN 1015 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE FN 55356 -LV,TOTAL BATCH 010 00008 •^y I•J Mr/t I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEWEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION# TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE^Mt mOx '.I. 1*^ 0** §m'mm ••»-• • ••t M •• •jJL i.--*. .• • • . mm» »I t• II I M I •» i..........................................^ _______________________________________^—- f.tfu”1.-_____________..........--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- ._ .* -®»aV_________ -7,-;r/',y. f i ^ ?PC o^ <>!« ...... 1 '«'>» ' '....- - .yfif •/th £V^’Wk -«<'*'‘*^ * •■• • • . i .. ♦ 1 • • - v.ti V* h . #/,V.l • •• ► • I'll •nMI ------— ,h?..rrr- • • •« •/.V>^__ y« 1)1»'vwii.AC 7at -/,at *)Ab'_ _ ,<J^- , M **« *•» •• •«.• ” «»4 <■•*•< mm- » I . i I i I t i I • * » • ■■i • ««•'«» •» •-•• iiBi t : -a • i*- -i *4-' ^ *-i- ■* -• i. « > • « (Ml. • • -••-<•>»' ••V *i ‘ • *« r *' .-4P— - *:•«•!► •' ill ■ f. ‘ L'T HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-300' A. House LENGTH WIDTH - X B. Garage c, D riveway D.. Sidewalk . X E. Patio / D eck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING X G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ♦ • - •• 9-ZZ - ii I - I 11^ W Vv ^ » « w S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. f jT/Z- v; ^300 t j.P. B 0 <PO X 100 •»To SEP 2 7 im ...is# r -tt. r - \0 ■ L HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SET3ACK 2C,N£; CNS) 0'75' (TS-lj^ Existing Hardcover in Zone *9 V .f ^ . wlJw-iUo «.5G0-IC0U- • A, House • •• •2JJS LENGTH WIDTH S.f. S.F. S.P. •-----. A . X m • s.Garage . - X -r/4 c.D riveway . X /foe X 0. /T400• • Sidewalk _X f /S f X 22 6._ X ___i,ATIO/Deck • X 4 • 3/0 a <• f.Unoscape X- _• AR<£AS underlain BY P( A«Tfr«. X -m t S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SHEETING S.F. S.F. • Am •• Q* Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total P^oferty Aria in Zcni S.F.« S.F. I a] 74^ ?^g I.F. S rLii.-2£^- X iOO - O % SEP 2 7 1994 • • • Hj:/ ■ i * % ..iadc i ! L HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET car^'/jiyi SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' (|50-5o63 500-10G0' Existing Hardcover in Zone Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone Z400 S.F. Jr. aoo t i.p. Z440 4 B Z OOP X 100 •%23 B % ■1 • • a . House X 8 • «;.p. LENGTH •• width • X ss S.F.• X 8 • • • S.F. •X • S.F. X a S.F. B.Garage ^_X S.F. C.Driveway ^ X s.r. t X . • • s!f. 0.. • • Sidewalk _X a S.F. .X S.F. • t ■ . X ,. S.F.i E.JatI0/ Deck X . . _..« . • • S.F* 1 • • • F.Landscape X S • F • »• i AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X a - S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • • S.F. • • X S.F. • a. Other X .S.F.i SEP 2 7 1994 • • •• • • K f ^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SS-3ACK zoim: (c;-.cLS ome) . 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' (J00-I000;j Existing Hardcover in Zone i'CC - C a g A. House B. Garage 0.. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck LENGTH • • X WIDTH • • ^ $ r 9 S.F. • X _ • 0 , S.F. •••X • ta S.F. ‘ - X S.»^ X .S.F. lY ■ ♦ X ______________-___________S.F. __X < ‘ .. .X » • • • * ' * • at . S.F. X _S.F. X m S.F. . S.F. ■ I ;:l F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING S.F. S.F. . S.F. G. O ther Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone _ S.F. • • • • * S.F. it ‘af fSmf.SEP E 7 1534 A-mm. I «\^ a • *t• r-. 4. ^- i ’*r* • *•[i I ----------JI-, SI I, i , - «i «H "‘I’ • • ' •.j| . • , • »*7 ■pBcJTMui^ t.t.e»»>Ti«»M i 1 ^<gr lJvATTg»i/l>C^I^ 1 • —- %Wr-r— ^ Mis'/ lyiMHlI^tt .V« *.^ivrv‘ .vjN^u 'u b b e t? - rb'ti i p t ^ b 0 o n 6; K'lm E a.o T \'. • jr;--* -.. i r'^^^-• ?;f:‘^'':i. v' .* . ■ ^ V • • • ♦ lUjIU ;j.n -_mj.fcRu^A w €c>ti^rrT 4 Aeg^a;::^ pa ■M ■•1 I -jOunitA^t t»-4»>^XTi<nii4 ^— ------------------------------------- «»«■ « I •* ^ "t • «a^ wl 4|A ••• « >•••<*'• ^ t r* • •• rv t •••r^ »* '• • r i' i ;r w •*f ir ••r i • 'N I • ’:• • 7 :•. . .*■ ■;« % . .4^* ^iSlili^C2Tr £tS?» 1 fCopK^ fUA»A j •MM ■- • •• . • DODD CE61DENCE ODORO. HINMtdOTX £f.j65. v;. e<;hy.;TrkA^^^. p.A. Af=^<sHITc4;rs. *• i • . « •«. . .. i«i ^ .»<■. «•'<.r^«9 « * -«•«»»*• • r L I'A October 7, I99h Orono Flannir.f Corrission He: Public Hearing, October 17, 199U ^a?77, ?30 Torkaua Head( • Chair and Other ,'er.bers of the Planninf! CoRrJ.S5icn: Our names are Ha;^.;ond J. and Hu.tn M» Hoffman* //e are o’-vner/resioents of the ;ror.erty on the south side of the proposed buiidin? site. Since June*15, 1967, or a little over twenty-seven (27) years, it has been home. • 2. 3. h We would ask the Co.’^aittee to denj' the request for jn average lakeshore setback variance for the following reasons: - The proposed structure wculd result in a jag in the line of existing hones by having a s-ructure standing in the middle of the landscaoe flov/. The proposed structure would obstruct our view of t e lake. There is lots of rcon on the lot to nove it back so as to be in com.oliance ’.d.th the site line ordinance. The hene to the north of the proposed site and the hor.e just south of our site wejre able to overcor'.c stceo sloping grades to cor.ply with the ordinance. "he ov/ner of the property just south of us requested a site line variance for similar reasons that was denied in 1969. The owner subsequent!” built a hone in cornliance with the ordinance and has a home fitted in the lot enhancing the beauty of the area irsteod cf neotroyir.f’ it. The present owners of the pro’'osed r.ropert"'^ are not full-tir.e residents of Minnesota and since the rurchase of the property have snent two to three weeks each year on the prooerty. If that is their intention for the future, it would seer; unreasonable to grant a variance to a two to three week resident that would affect the beauty and enjoyment of the permanent residents. For the reasons statec, v/e believe that the value of our property and neirhboring properties also would be reduced if a variance is granted. fc. Heing out of town the week of October 17 and unable to attend the meeting in person, we hope this letter will state our concerns clearly and, if not, we woulc ask the Com;'-..ttee to table this 'until their next meeting. Sincerely, ' Y- - -— • // HajT.cnd J. Hoffman Ruth .M. Hoffman loco Tonkawa Road Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 * - i I \ I ja • * —■ k>.►- —. 1 / '* / • 1 1 111 ■1 / J • 1915 I I b 1 Si i ♦ 9 g| H ' -<‘’ cV-i- ^1Si«5;;.5i:',:r «3“' ■■«i .*# • , ^ --I-- 3*'-JX^’’; •' • y^"- •?■''■ V-^5: JS • i i ■ ‘i •‘ ^ '»*' ‘ V * -0it %.*.. *v. ^ L ^ '. *: • -< • . V.« - V! li > *' .;;- ^.l p: m- '" ■■■"' 'a!'f •■ m ■ ■M ^. I I ^ / •> * 1 r. .••■I y^s :■*'. v •:; 'y,;; Ta- “• •-’'.7:*Si fcMA ^ ^ ’; • • ’ I «V ' I ^ 1 • • < -4 1^’ ^ pi? .V.vi;/.^’. iifeiiiii **.' ^ . ? • * .i ' •«% * »• . I • ^ • . ; r * *' ' • '• t ‘. t t . « * ... X Zt •' V- ' • V . .1 _ r- :r . '• ^ ■ %• ^ ■ > . 1 ’ /V S . ^ '.vv- *. ' A , •i . w •' •• .' t- > % ♦ r* • V V. ♦. $ I I < t. 'I, ' %t'V i -J • ^ 4. p \^v.\ ', .1.1 , S*r^:-.lV';'l t « I -s :*■ r I ."\i . i ^ i» ^.v ‘ .. ♦ ' . ' * ‘ V' .; A ' , r : y •' 'i- ‘V e ■• • V ^ W-?\y‘X ,\--J ^7. K-r ; -> 9 !■: V'j' ', '\i ar-i- . ..' it; fr’»?.'kN ‘ s 0-m- '*.. 1^; >V;?., • W,.; * , - ■ ’ ‘■^ .' ♦■• •' V * .• ^ • r i '*■' ; ‘V ^ >• ... '-^ f7 : - u’■'^^'<;-:>• ^'.rt ilV ' ’■i'' v*-- m •r'\ \ 9 '* I .f * ■'r;‘ ' f p < f • - V ^•v. -; ■ :• •^;- cV^:; Vlt54i?MW '.’h' ' ■'.'** t::’'7 w> ■: • 7 ^ iiSt.-f ■ '-V. A* 3^fe5» m >-ms3m ei'.'W *»• «.*. ..... ' <Wa?‘ ■.' '* ■;| \^m^------------ A * '-.-A .v^-.'- * ■ '7' V'V>;.s; r., V. ■ .-f'lV'» * V v*f>5>. ■vy*C.\*‘■-'A. 'V > -» •* ' ,* :’n » V •^vsXY' .vl^i fw*' /M. ?S2w2Pc ' ./rfr> '’vd V,\ V ' -f k '. A ^* j • i. •*; '* 7' ■ ■’ .;••i7>-v*. . I • .' .• vVJ .^ •* 77- ■■ -I ■' .i •'' V •y V \. W . V ■ ' ' ‘ . . . . ‘ 4>, .7 ' \ ^ ' '7* ..7 V V^-Ci* ■ '• ’.• •‘7' * • . V f 1** ' 7 ‘ vV^,V'., • ' ' - V - i \ \ V :- 7. -• -Vi • '. . . . I • t y . , . « » . V:L i ' . •■ *1' r 1 p October 13. 1994 Orono Planning Commission Re: Public Hearing, October 17, 1994 7. #1977, 980 Tonkawa Road Chair and Other Members of the Planning Commission: We are <he neighbors to the north at #970 °f*e proposed new home ,o be built to the south of us. #98a We and we have moved into our new home in December, 1993 w purchased from the builder. Dick Lauer. We have seen the plans of the new home for the Dorrs. We are very happy and excited about having a new home next to us. « undcLtdiid that the McCulleys will continue to live in the Dorrs ne home during the summer months. Mr. McCulley ^ the Dorrs will be spending more time at the lake and are looki g ahead to retirement here. We have recently been informed of a letter of objection to the proposed new building at 980 Tonkawa. A variance has been requested by the Dorrs to place the new structure on the same site as the existing structure. If this v^ance is refused, the house site will be moved back over 90 feet. This will result in the destruction of the natural . mature trees and the necessity to cut into a steep cliff with the removal of a great amount of soil and mature plantings. this variance is granted. We feel the new structure will only enhance and improve the Shborhood and. in effect, add to the property values of all the neighboring homes. ! i David and Marilyn Booth 970 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 r %^ STATE OF D^lKi[iS<0>S'. .Tde ^artment of natural resources - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 PHONE NO. METRO WATERS 772-7910 1200 >il£ nC October 13, 1994 Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 ecT,',Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 re: land USE APPLICATIONS, CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Gaffron: *. «« 4-ho followinq land use applications on theI have conunents on the Planning Commission agenda for 10/17/9 . M,.i1vn Dorr Property, Tonlc»wa Road QT^ 133-24L. The applicants «ques^t approval of^an. ^the^fr^perlf th« variance for construction There was a question aboutcurrently contains a seasonal cabin. There whether the steep areas , ,, wa concur with city staff feet from the lake were ^^““^^^"^“yfrordinance: thesethat, based on strict interpretation of the ci_^ steep areas are not bluffs. we nave no should lakeShore setback variance te<^«t However, the y ^.0,1 Thomas W. rashman Property. 1509 Tom T,aka Boulevard IZlt 160P)^ The applicant requests approval of a ^«iance^for^street_^and^side yard setbacks for a new garage ® f^y approving the garage deck. We have no objection the proposed deck replacement. However, we recommend the ^gting house is adLtion on the lake side of the house. The object to already right at the top of ^a^ppears that it may beany further encroachment on the bluff. i PP house feLible to construct a smaller deck on th® ®ast s d^ ^f^^ overall that would meet the bluff f^^tures such as the stoneapproval, we would encourage removal of features suca walk and patio block area. AN EQUAL OPPORTU^^>TV "MPLOYER IV p. e .i99t Jctocer 2h, lyjii • • Grcno PlanninE Corr.issicn ?te: P'jblic Hearing, October 17, 199U 7. .«;^1977, Tcnkawa Road Chair and Other Xenbers of the Planning Corrlssion: Cur nar^ies are RavT.or.d J. and Rath M. Hoffnan. 've are o ’.vner/residents of the procert.,^ cn the south sxde of the proposed buildir.p site. Since J’ur.e 1?, 156' , or a little over twenty-seven (2?) years, it has been home. After further review of the architects plans for the proposed constracticn site, v;e vois'r. to vrithdraw our opposition to the anoroval of an averare lakestiore setback variance. Raymond J. Hciiman Rath. I-'. Hoffr.an ICC"? Tonkawa Road Long Lake, Mirxesota 55356 [ I f \ CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1977 NOTICE OF PLANTMING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 10/26/94 TO: Mr. & Mrs. Lawrence Dorr 4335 Woodleigh Lane La Canada Flintridge, CA 91011 COPIES TO:Bruce W. Schmidtt Bruce W. Schmidtt & Assoc. 320 Manitoba .Ave. S. Wavzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance DATE OF MEETING: 10/17/94 VOTE:7 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Planning Commission recommended approval of the application as proposed recommending approval of an encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line. Staff has been in contact with the Hoffmans, the owners of the property to the immediate south, and they have advised that they now too approve the proposal as presented to the Planning Commission. The variance will result in a 97 ’ encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line. The City has asked Hoffmans to submit a letter of approval for the City Council’s review. Applicants’ next scheduled meeting is confirmed at the City Council meeting of November 14, 1994. Please note that meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. A copy of the approval resolution will be mailed to you prior to the meeting. If you have any questions pertaining to the findings and conditions set forth in that resolution, please contact staff prior to the meeting. The approval resolution will be presented for Council’s action at their November 14th meeting. r request for council action •t C>H DATE: 7. f9^^ ITEM NO.: / ^9</ Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: 1994 Marina License - Windward Marine List of Exhibits A - License B - Application and Attachments Windward Marine submitted their 1994 license application and fee on February 9, 1994 HowevCT tte Certificate of Insurance needed to complete the application the end of June 1994. Submittal of the application for Council approval was further delayed by Staff pending review of a number of issues as noted below. Applicant has generally been in compliance with the seven operation sundards and last year comptoed the paving of the westerly parking lot which was the tmal remaining facet of th marina reconstruction approved in 1989. While suff is recommending that the 1994 license be issued. Council is advised that suff will be discussing the following issues with the applicant: Long-term storage of cars and commercial equipment occurring on the residential lot, rather than use of it for merely overflow parking. • Continual parking of boats for sale in the main parking lot. taking up required parking spaces. storage of cradles, etc. along the east side of County Road 15 may need to be revisited; staff received one complaint about this last winter. Review dock flotation (unencased styrofoam must be eliminated by 12/31/94). • Maintenance of stormwater baffle weir system . Unresolved questions regarding the gazebo sewer connection. J r Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 November 8, 1994 1994 Marina License - Windward Marine Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the 1994 Marina License for Windward Marine, Inc. as attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Proposed Motion: Moved by ___. seconded, by ___, to approve the 1994 Marina License for Windward Marine. Inc. at 1444 Shoreline Drive. Vote: ____ayes._____nays. ♦: Kttu ♦n ♦ I,: *1,1 ♦ a* 11 ♦ i itPrC-3£aSuiiMym\a^ii-]83]^^( ri’Y OF ORONO CKNF.RAl, I.K’KNSK NV 2533Name of Business;Windward Marine, Inc.Principal Owner: Janies and Mary RiversAddress1444 Shoreline Drive Date Issued November 14, 1994Date Expires December 31, 199 4 (Issued for license year 1-1-94 thru 12-31-94)Wayzata, MN 55391 State License No.As a condition of receiving this license, the licensee shall furnish the City with a satisfactory surety bond, and liability and property damage insurance, when required by the City Code, and shall have complied with all the requirements of the City of Orono, pertaining to the particular type of ac*ivitv or business licensed. This license is non transferable.KIND OF LICENSK3 Cotmtercial Dock/Marina License Septic System Installation and/or PumperGarbage Hauler Residential Kennel Commercial Kennel $ 200.00$_______________ $ $ $ Total Amount Paid to City.................................................................$___2QQ.QQ. CITY Of ORONO OITVofOllONO P o BOX G6 CHYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA 55323 PHONE 4/3 735/ Signature of City Official While - File Copy Michael P. Gaffron, Ass't. Planning & Zoning Administrator Yellow - Licensee E8S38 I ♦♦ i,m;: ♦ :;j ♦»1.: ♦ i,: ♦ ♦ s > n ♦::: ♦sea • • • • .'''O o "> i'l / CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Keliev ParKwey Oronc. VN 5:355 Mailing Address; P Q Bex 65 Crystal say. N“> 55223 C055 2533 I. n. I. j. Exhibit A - License No. CONDITIONS OF LICENSE APPROV.A lL. This license authorizes the licensee to operate a marina business in uhe Cir>' of Orono per the following conditions: Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards:* Parking 'facilities on the site .shall be managed so as to eluninate trafiic or parking congestion, eliminate Ulcgal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring propert}’. Boat engine testing and charging shall be luiuted to the hours S;00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to Lhe hours 7:00 a.m. to iO.OO p.m. e.xcept as necessarv' to accociraodaie normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free or garbage. 5. On-land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. 6. Parking and on-iand storage of boats, traders, materials and equipment shall be limited to Uiose locations shown on an approved site operation plan, wmci p shall be submiaed or updated as part of the annua! license app cauon. uc si e operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the ialte, and adjacent properties. Failure to adhere to these standards shall be cause for license suspension or ,>.o^eCion per the provisions of the Cir>' code. Fuel Sales. This marina is authorized for fuel sales subject to compliance with the State Fire Code. 4 Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 r Ilirs. ^v'‘ - V;.:ii!•**’ •■' ■■ ■, './<■ ' •• ’ '•■. ..•■/ • = • '' A^7^-r ; / ■ T--rir*7 9^ k- :‘ • U /•I* " A . ^* '* I / * • t / * ■V* ' , ' ' 1 • ••'^.•; \‘|f •* ^ • 1*1 _ 4/ •r .«•M '•• ii'* *Il|M Ir •«i'ivj :.- i • • *- ■ ;•i.'f «•» • * I I • * ^ • • * •• •' . ' * •/ *»• '.I'- s rj.m.1 •.'i tVM • smis^ A‘( -vm•• •’Jr V ,!■ ••^■•\; • ^V^■:.|.•^•;V>''^ A ‘-V —7*r ■ • • •. 3 • . /.; :• -.J,; ■ f .. •. ■•••/■/=•. •• 'I ■; ‘)l7,ti > ** • • . . • . • I, • • *>,1 • * .I I : I '• • • • • • . •• •« : \ T'mM- >7.;v |!'M - :• <; S x-i'c'. il. • • * -1; \ \ - A-.! 'f r iC'll ■. :' •• : .• . ■ ■.••. . •i "rt, • • • ••V ;. •• • • . • • • 'vU-; > • r # % --------- -y I • i ..a;*#*/ •X ?jV' I Vi7.'jr.‘5<W:l Vh I ! .. -. kI '! ‘1 . “TO: t>K V ^ • :»t! I:.. • • ‘ —:---------------- . • \i ) f i • • * ‘ •Vi ^ . . • I ■ ■ • -.1 . ^'=ecJ 1 T<V •• ♦ • V. Kwffl . . ' ■ -tOB '-V' fe ^||Wj: C';v"' ' CSaBfft V' "■^■■1^ S* '•>*“' 'r »■ ; • •' •/11 7^9^ ■I ^ '•*<#. .*' > J ' ' . V I . .■.•*’ ' V^- '!■ *■ i'T; •••.■: ••.'< • i’-. . : . '.-.Vr'-’ v .' • hf,||,'. • 1 ■' I i' X ]■.’.•■• '1 .’• •* •-' • •ui?" ' 1-V I»' 1 •' 1 ■ ■ ' ■ '• •' ■ * • • • % • • ^ • .1 i* I ' ' ■ ^ t ^/:V- ■A^/Wc.^ ■ I • 1 . . ,5 . . ! : ♦ > •! iMT* . ■ ' ^T*. I • . •»^Fa ’ « I •* * ' I F.' «‘i!‘i I* * ‘ ' • * *. .\ %h?. ••/•.. i’..II Mfe’' -I ki' r.:. •.:. ■• .* S*: • • ;*f i \k .&CITY OF ORONO Crystal Ba Phone 473 P.O. Box 66, Crvstal Bayr ^Unnes^a 1-73^7 License Year Dale application sent to Marina / ~ f ^ ^Date application returned to City ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 15 OF THE LICENSE YEAR, BUSINESS INFORMATION ^ 1. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Ia Jik ^PU) 2. ^ O Street Address / 7 z Mailing Address__________ Marina Phone S OWNERSHIP/OPERATION L Office Phone Fee Owner (if different than above) Address ap mm» • « w a • • m / r f f • J. f »Ai7 t r.rrrrr f L‘l I .AWL. iTii 7nnMA * iJ i A w V V VVv ■■LijUITi’ L. I tL. U-M M rr\iva WL.I1 ______Ti I Im Tnn r 4. W' a V •.'.•T r* WL'V • V Phone f:crrrw7_ru.\iii.' -'nnML. L. A. a I I t nmfi\ tut,* 3. BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) -»rvrrT<r-frrr>i Cni t<>/ u*L‘w*v L. v.'vx 'a- r > ' .* » l V individual ownership partnership corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: N/^ ^ ^ Name of tj^marina manager responsible for daily operation: A^i ^^1 List the minimum nui Ml » -ff<if wi«a till lairigiifii open to during the boating scuoA;. ^ dock attendants ' « others avaOafelp liar awii^inii, ii»;' • • % List every short or long term business occupant ot the property' other than the Business noted above; uw Mi/rti.*ncrrrr i.‘l f A ut. •i “/in / 1 V' a V' V jAiiV vmi inm« r u*v f uni 7f» t r \ ^ * 1 • I r ^ t iv. Vw/ V 4.PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): X in-water slip rental buoy rental dry storage winter in and out service boat launching (day-use ramp) boat rental __ boat clubs /, repair parts and service __ fuel sales bait and tackle sales ~y~ boat and trailer sales charter boat port-of-call other (list)_____ - y, boat holding tank pumpout BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): X open all year open during boating season only PM____ , ^ List proposed hours of operation: dock access ------ retail sales & service AM to ^ ; JMARINA SECURITY is provided by; J,r. ______ . • _CARETAKER living on site? <sl.lPS AND BOAT UNITS and site plan submitted with this application. Rental Slips/ Other Total Owned Boats Spaces BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) a. At dock slips Total Boats in Water Boats i'B 9. BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a. Inside Buildings ------ b. Outside on Racki ------ c. Outside - other means ------ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use ------- TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) Page 2 of 5 10. OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. New boats for sale (inventory) c. Used boats for sale (inventoiy’) d. Other (list:___________________) Total Inside Building Outside Building 'L.o 1*^ Total li 11. OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a. Transient boats (repair/service) b. Contract storage (customer’s boats) c. Inventory (new & used boats) d. Other (list:___________________) Total OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS Inside Building •2. lO Outside Building Total mil SUMMER PARKING a. Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum ( + 1 per each 800 s.f. over 1, b. Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use (.6 ___(line 9)) = c. Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = TOTAL SPACES s.f.) = 13. WINTER PARKING a. [.2 X __(add lines 12a and 12b)] DOCK CONSTRUCTION 1 spaces CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: V Permanent ____ Seasonal __ Wood ____ Concrete Wood Metal Pilings: Decking: Flotation Method (if used): V Foam ___ De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other _____ Other Barrels Other LICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license standards: A. Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B. I icenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the Page 3 of 5 otal licenseholder. and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. C. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards; 1) Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring propert>'. 2) Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3) Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. 5) On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. 6) Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as pan of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7) Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Business Use I icenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2. except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. I icense Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions ot this chapter. mce Page 4 of 5 attachments The following must accompany this application: 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY inuicating the boundaries of the marina property' and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration ot the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for Ihe duration of the license period. 3. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. 4. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. t o o Initial Application @ $300.00 _____ Renewal Application @ $200.00 ___ Late Fee (if not postmarked by February 15) $100.00 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION S— THE \1ARIN/» V nPFV FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE RY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City ?ou^", ,orcv^ i^is Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and fhe Civ ”designated employees o^ents tdenter upon the marina propeny at any reasonable tune to perform safety and code^p^hipli^e mspections. .Authorized Signat6re Tide Relationship to Owner 1.TT _ Date Page 5 of 5 MMMm. CERTIRCATE OF INSURANCE PNOOUCCN ICS Agency, Inc. 4901 W. 77th St #148 Edina, MN 55435 OATC (MHOOYV) 6-24-94 YHIS^CEAYIF iCA te is issued as a matte ITOf informa IioN OtiLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE ER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR WTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. oi-VJM • rr\ajOAKi ■miito COMPANY COMPANY B COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Great American Insurance Companies Windward Marine, Inc. 1444 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 COMPANYc COMPANY D COVCIIAQES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED WTVVITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE^ BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS TYPCOFINSUflANCE POLICY NUMBER POUCV tFFECTTVE POUCV EXPIRATION DATE (MMrOOYY) DATE (MMOO/YY)LIMITS •• ! GENERAL UABNJTY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABIUTY PAC 7—12 —85-27 —02 CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR ' OWNER'S A CONT PROT 6-1-94 6-1-95 GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS COMP^OP AGG PERSONAL A AOV INJURY EACH OCCURRENCE FIRE DAMAGE lAnv on* MED EXP (Any one person! 500,000 500,006 500,0^6 500,000 56,000 ^ 5,o66" ' I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY I ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT BODILY INJURY (Per person! ind OMMCUAMUTY ‘ ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (*»€f accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE AUTO ONLY EA ACCIDENT OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY EACH ACCIDENT Ar^GREGATE EXCESS UABIUTY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE YVOfHCEflS COMPENSATION ANO EMPl OVERS* UABIUTY THE PROP^ f.N PARTNER^.‘^E^:•- 'E OFFICER' W ■5TWEW— STATUTORY LIMITS EACH accident D isease policy limit disease each employee KSCWnW* or ifESir CEmiTCAT^IIbLOER City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 CANCELLATION SHOULD AMY Of TOE ABOVE OESCWBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE TOE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. TOE ISSOINQ COMPANY YWLL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 days yywtten notice to toe certificate holder named to toe left. BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SMALL IMPOSE NO OBUOATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KINO UPON TOE COE^AWY. ITS AGENTS OR REPRESEMTATIVES. authorized REI TAttVE • ACORD CORPORATION 1993 w CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley ParKway Orono. MN 55356 Mailint Address: P 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 April 7, 1994 Windward Marine, Inc. 1444 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 ATTN: Jim Rivers Re: 1994 City Marina License Application Dear Mr. Rivers: w. .ecew. you, .94 ^ u." r f“'you, appncltion .0 considered con,p.e.e. Please submit this as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact me at 473-7357. Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch Enc. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 November 14,1994 Orono. MN 55356 Re: Application Number 1965 Dear Michael. • 60j-r> Su5Ck Mr. Michael P. Gaffron, m Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator j * City of Orono ^ zO Li:' N 2780 Kelley Parkway -^/-ry U ^ —IfvnioD/^CM^t:^ «-tT C5P Coi/p/^ t*7^. -jgetsaesr^s ^uajc/l-^ to l*m writing for two reasons: to update the city on the status of our proposed construction of new retaining walls down to the lake and a request to Orono's City Council. 1. Gustafson Design, Inc. (our landscape designer), contacted two quality construction companies, specializing in retaining wall work, to bid on our property. The bids were to follow the engineer specifications, prescribed building techniques and stone materials per the City's approved resolution and conditional use permit, file no. 1965. Dale Gustafson estimated that the cost of the work could run between $40,000 and $50,000. Edgework Builde.''s. Inc. of Chanhassen and Concept Landscaping. Inc. of Mound submitted bids that were approximately $30,000 higher than what we had expected. Although I preferred to use lannon stone, I had to look at affordable alternatives. Dale Gustafson suggested using Allen block, a manufactured material. Appearance-wise, it would be a good substitute for lannon stone and the cost would be less. At our request, both construction companies rebid the project, using Allen block as the retaining wall material. This time, both estimates were within an affordable price range (mid $50's). 2. Attached is our signed and notarized copy of the City Council's resolution granting variances and a conditional use permit. I ask that the city approve the document as is, without delay, and let me direct the construction company to use Allen block instead of lannon stone for the retaining wall material. I've been assured by both Gustafson Design and Edgework Builders, Inc. that all other components would remain the same as specified by the City Council and agreed to by American Engineering Testing, Inc. and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates. Without this immediate approval. I've been told by Edgework Builders that the work cannot be started this fall and that it would be advisable to then postpone construction until late fall 1995. r i Mr. Michael P. Gaffron November 14,1994 Page 2 Finally, in our planting diagram to the city, large numbers of Wilton Carpet Junipers have been included so to drape over the walls to give a natural effect and to soften any wall areas that may be exposed to the human eye. Additionally, ivy will be planted at the base of these same areas to add a variety of vegetation and greenery. Respectfully yours. James H. Lear 471-7310 r 1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates 'X s jr^ -V.tc^ fju.#' CcxkyTurr, t'^c-c\fr Engineers & Architects Cro Ci :*Ow ? *r^- A ‘"f • C L "t ? V?*e' '•^ t V 5ree»: 0 SoV*n V Eoe»«r c * •>^-C' Cr'' A-«tjrn “ .MV J-J * • r:~ * ' i f 3 ^ *f-‘ 5 f Pf November 2, 1994 t : X e- :- *»! - 4>. - C -rv^ctJ • z^. J * * • «^., A M OC Vc**^ ’ •-3 % «-e\J Pf Z ota^ C ?« ®£ A s*'^ ®£ . S:*»’0c'4 **£ -^>e V^r *^: Vv-j^ *» V • ' J ♦ C *» •••.''•4S *^«e'vy' Pf V\'*e : r ^'vv— ‘’E »CTT *'r;j'^t P? V.*'* ff fljfv V^»» ^ Sec ^’E Jj'v A •.«rt^tr *»? Zj - EJ A Cc* V.-'-'-ot c :j vvr> PE % r aj, V V es 3 .e-ve- «»£ ^ p*» -.c G'<»v- s»? X 'i jjrv r* ^'^vrr*‘r ■e?" ^ vcc Dou.; js . fe"t: t pc >-.^i\*' r G-CJ*vc” ^c C« o C -we* •»£ pJu< G c**" ® G ^rre* ^E r*'.»*ev * r'ctM'"/f P.»y\r-va, V : w ~ % City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 % Attention: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: Old Crystal Bay Road S.A.P. 152-102-11 File 13960 Dear John: Enclosed are four copies of the 1st Request for Pavment for the above referenced project. This portion of the work has been satisfactorily completed and we lecommend payment. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES Harlan M. Olson HMO:lk Enclosures uov t994 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 r I> ► I f f |/l| Booestfoo fVoi«n« AndcHMi A AfsocUtn W mtmrntt Fnr Period Start to November I.Re<|uest N'n. I SUMMARY 1 Oripinal Contract Amount 2 Chan lie Orilcr - Aildilu'n 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised ('oniract Amount 5 Value ('ompicted to Date ft Material i'<n Hand 7 Amount Uarned S I.ess Rctainape 5''^ 0 Sub-Total 10 Less Amc'unt Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUli nils Ri:OUnST FOR PAYMENT NO. REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Municipal State Aid Street Impnwcment Old Crystal Bay Road Project No. S.A.P. L‘52-102-11 I'ilc No. 13960 -•A ' cC\ t » -3 Recommendrtl foj Approval by: BONESTROO/r OSEI^. ANDERLIK A c ASSOCIATES. INC. V Approved bv ( ontractor: nUrt'.M o IIITt'MINOt'S, INC. Approved by Owner; CITY OF OKONO, MN Speciried Contract Completion Date; Rr.sTORA'noN <1 i:/\nup : 6/1/‘>5 Al.I. onil-w work : ^riOf'U Date:. 1.W.0RIP $!.‘:7.10.V(K $157.in.VCH s 31 .4nn.oi $o.ni $31,400.01 $1 ,570.0( $29,,'<30.ni $0.0' $29,8.40.0' ; r- — ;rrr " f r ^ ; Ifrm 2101.502 2101.. <507 2104.501 2104.. 501 2104.. 505 2104.. 521 0|04.(SOi 0105.609 210.5.. 501 210.5.. 507 210.5.521 2105.5.55 2211.. 501 2211.. '502 2.151.. 504 2311.. 508 2111.510 2311.514 2.5.71.51 x SP.I 2157.502 0412.^-04 2451.5 M 2.501.515 2.501.515 1502.541 1501.511 2.501.511 2.50.7.511 2.501.571 2503.573 SP-2 SP1 Mnsc Rid . S A P. 152>I02-II CIcnnnp (Ircc) GruMmic (Ircc) Ucnunc pl.ilc bc.ini gunr. ;iil Remove 15- CMP cuhcrl Remove bituminous pnvcmcul S.ilvncc chnin link fence Rclocnlc mailboxes, signs, cic. Gcoiexlile fabric. Type V' Common excavation (P) Subgradc excavation Granular borrow (CV) Salvaged lopisoil (CV) Aggregate biisc. CI.5. lOO'T crushed quarry rock Agcri gate base. Cl. 3 (P) (CV^) AC’-1 bit. material for mixture Type 41 wearing course mixture l>X>c 3) binder course mixture Type 31 base course mixture Hiluminous mixture for walk Dnvcw.ay restoration f^ituminous material for t.k^lc coal Modular block retaining wall ('oarse filter aggregate (CV') 12” C'M pipe apron 12” R(' pipe apron 4** perforated Pf£ pipe drain 12" CM pi|H; sewer 12“ Rf’ pipe sewer ((T V). |\M; 3fX)6 15 “ R( ‘ pipe sev%er (( T V). |)ev3lH)6 I urn. Sc install l2-xl2"CM pipe tee I'uriiisli iiLstall 12* CM pipe 14 degree bend Construct catch basin, design SP-2 Construct catch b.xsin. design SP-3 Cofrtrxt Qvaatity Unit Pri« Quamity To Data lOMtaiii To l>alo EA 10 50.00 4 200 00 EA 10 50.00 4 200 no I.F 220 3.00 I.F 75 6.00 SY 1.530 3.00 uoo 1.900.00 U-320 4.00 300 1.200.00 1 200.00 SY 2.760 I.OO 2J00 .■’2'Oo.on CY 1.500 32)0 IJOO 70.00 CY 500 4.50 300 1 -750.00 CY 2.500 9.00 CY 440 7.00 TN 1.600 9.50 1200 11.400.00 CY 950 1100 4.50 5.400.00 TN 43 120.00 TN 195 17.00 TN 260 16.00 TN 325 16.00 •[•N 84 30.00 SY 250 6.50 C.L 3.50 1.00 SF 1150 13.50 CY 80 15.00 F.A ■>60.00 EA 2 400.00 I.F 500 3.00 LF 120 35.00 IF NO 2100 El-200 23.00 EA 1 150.00 EA 1 250.00 \l,\1 650.00 EA 2 1.200.00 1 lor.o Rpi* UP-1 r [ ‘ I Item 'Jnil CoBtract Quant itjr Unit Prkr 2511.501 KnnJtnn rip rnp. Cl.i.^?; HI CY 4 80.00 2531.501 Concrete curb putIcr-fX'sipn Mb|8 LF 950 7.00 SP-4 Rcinforcinc for cone, curb A. cutter LF 60 0.50 0557/1^3 rurnisli it eh.iin link fence. 0* i.ill IJ-340 10.00 055/.003 1‘uriiisli insl.'iil ch.'iiii link fence. 42 ” t.ill LF 120 1100 0504.603 4** wide solid line, yellow p.-iint LF IJOO 0.30 0564.603 4** wide solid line, white pnint I.F UOO OJO 2573.503 Silt fence, prc.xsscmbicd LF 100 3.00 2575.50! Ro.idsidc seed me AC 0.4 L 100.00 2575.502 Seed, mixture 500 LB 40 2.00 2575.505 Sodding. Ty*pc l.wn SY 2.000 1.50 2575.511 Mulch nintcrinl. Type I TN 0.8 250.00 2575.519 Disk .inchorinc AC 0.4 100.00 2575.531 Comnicrcinl fcrlili/cr. aimlysis 20-10.10 TN 0.2 300.00 Qaanlity To Daft Amminl To Dale Totnl Work Completed to iXitc S31.400.00 RFP RP-2 r'■ ^ -j PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner Project Project No. File No. CotUnictor City of Orono Municipal State Aid Street Improvement S.A.P. 152-102-11 nuffalo Hituminous. Inc. CHANCE ORDERS No. Date I Amount Total Chanfte Orders • Add PAYMENT SUMMARY No. 1 2 3 4 s Period Start 11-1-94 Payment $29,830.00 Retninafte $1,570.00 Completed $31,400.00 ft 7 8 9 10 Tot.il P.ivmcnt to Date 0 Rctain.nge. I’.iymcnt No. Total Value ('ompictcil 29.830.00 1.570.00 $31,400.00 Original Contract Change Orders Revised Contract 157.105.00 0.00 $157,105.00 l30(,nRrP RP-3 .1^--__J r I AI Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates A *v i Cc ^' E^u 3> C?*\x"'r^'* .*\ Engineers & Architects iocer A ^c'*'-e ^6 • .~ .^c'‘ C *'■;»*' « ’£ V j'\ *' . J '? 6 ’u^e* 3 C-'c^ 6 Ncvrs P£ 9:jOe^ G 5c''un<nr P£ M C * •Se^xy C^-wTart November 8, 1994 j * a*'*”'- * J.ycc'' **£ ^ *e «»£ ra. : > :.cucfa C' ffu»ie* A ' A A 3 out:o'i \ia’« A •-•anson ®E Vc^'ae- T ?3^rrT^arn P£ V- • = e a **' —j' - A rc*"^jC Su^oafC: '^c'^av A P£ •Ja'Trrj ^E rc A C** •M^-r. Pt Vc-^ » Jji. V:— V ff-- -ai A ®r . ^ V'^ae C ..'X- "S a'^ p Va .^n<3 Pf ,e"n, ? PE jccff - *Tja^eA PE Ae'v>etf' p Ance-vr* p£ Mark p Pcsfv PE Va»fc A >o PE lar» A Vr e- PE pjo* - Ga'^^o^ Da^'^ * •*€■ A a • - f Pi* - EiicjercK' % »N.%• 9C Va « :? V e\ 3 -e- r- . c L .r.» Aa^ . A •■'£ Z‘^'\ D P£ P »«,'C PE wCuC as - r PE Sr*awvr« c G^.tfaV-'* PE Certo O P£ fao* G p£ ■D'*'' P Gv "r** p£ C^a' -s A £ xtu:'' XfC V ^ V C 'C'' Mr. John Gerhardson City of Orono P O Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <?/* ^4 **- * <% ■‘j % jiCV C V 1S^^ Pay Request No. 2 Brown Road SAP 152-107-01 Our File No. 13972 Dear John: Enclosed please find Request for Payment No 2 for the Brown Road project. This portion of the work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend payment. If you have any questions, please contact me. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC 'A Harlan M Olson HMOpr Enc. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MIM 55113 • 612-636-4600 J r tonettfoo Owner C'ilv of Oromi. I’.O. Box 66. ('rvslal Bav, MN 5323 Dale November ><. For Period Och>bcr 1. I‘>*M t*j November S, I<W4 Request No. 2 Contractor Buffak> Biluminou.x. 2S52 County Road 12 North. Buffalo. MN 55313 REQUEST FOR PA\TVIENT MUNICIPAL STATE AID IMPROVEMENTS BRO%VN ROAD RECONSTRUCTION - SAP 152-107.01 WATERTOWN ROAD CULVERT - SAP 152-IO.t 01 I-ile No. 13972 SUMMARY 1 Original ('ontraet Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - [Reduction 4 Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date 6 Material on I land 7 Amount Carned <S Le.ss Kelainagc 9 Sub-Total $ $ S 10 Le.s.s Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUi: n IIS RI-OUl-.S^r r OR payment no. Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor: BUFFAI.O DITUMINUUS, INC. Approved by tTuncr: CITY OF ORONO Specified Contr.act Completion Date: JUNP. 16, 1995 566.506.50 $‘J66.506.50 $261.510. I< $0.00 $261.510.15 $13.075.51 s 24S.4.t4.f4 $18.536.40 $229.898.24 Dale; i- Item UiiH CoffllllKt Quantity Unit l*rire QuRnlity To Dale \mounl To Dale 2101.501 2101.506 2104.501 2104.501 2104.505 0104.601 010.5.609 2105.501 2105.. 507 2105.521 2105.535 2211.501 2331.504 2331.508 2.331.510 2.331.514 2.331.518 SP-I 2357.502 0412.604 2451.511 2501541 2506.522 2521.501 1531.. 501 SP-2 0531.602 156.3.601 2564.531 05M.602 0564.602 0564.603 0564.603 Hrown Road North Pnrt A > Street • SAP 152>107>0l Clc.iriiic (tree) (^nihhiiie (tree) Remove concrete curb A gutter Remove pipe culvert Remove hituminou.^ p.'ivcmciil Relocnic m«iilboxes. signs, etc. Cicotextilc fabric. Tvjk V (‘omnioii excav.ition (P) Subgr.idc excavation Granular borrow (CV) Salvaged topsoil (CV) Aupregale base. ri.5. \00% crushed quarry rock A('-l bit. material for iiuxlurc r>i>e 41 wcaniig course mix. (1995) ‘Pype 31 binder course mixture Type 31 base course iiiLXture nituiiiiiious mixture for walk Driveway restoration Mituminous material for tack coat Modular block relaniiiit: wall ('«».irsc filler aegrcgale (( *V') 4" |H;rforaled Pli pipe drain Adjust frame and ring cstg. 4” concrete walk roiicrcic curb A gutter-Design 1)61 iS Reinforcing for a^nc. curb A gutter Pedestrian curb ramp Traffic control Furn.A iii.st sign panels. Type C Pavement message (left arrow) paint Pavement message (left arrow) epoxy 4" wide solid line, yellow paint 4" wide solid liiK, yellow epoxy AC 0.2 2.000.00 0.2 400.00 AC 0.2 2.000.00 0.2 400 00 U-40 4.00 30 120.00 U-540 7.00 3(H)1100.00 SY 10.300 1.25 9.500 11.875.00 LS 1 500.00 SY 14.400 1.00 13.000 13.000.00 c :y 11000 3.25 10.(H)0 32.500.00 CY 1.200 4.00 350 1.400.00 CY fiOO 10.00 CY 1.850 5.00 TN 9.700 8.50 7.600 64.600.00 TN 231 115.00 102.08 11760.00 IN 1.050 17.00 TN 1.400 15.00 626,01 9J90.15 TN 1.750 15.00 1.2.30 18.450.00 TN 580 .50.00 SY 5.50 10.00 CL I2?00 1.00 250 250.00 sr U300 n.oo CY 50 10.00 l.l-850 7.00 liA 4 200.00 SI-20 5.00 LI-7.230 5.00 5.500 27.500.00 1 r 3fi0 0.50 r.A 5 115.00 LS 1 5.000.00 0.5 2.500.00 sr 37.5 35.00 EA 1 30.00 l-A 1 50.00 LF 5_500 0.20 LF 5.500 0.20 RP-1 Cnnintct If nit Qtinolity \mo«nl Unit Quantity PricT To Diite To Dolr LF 500 0.20 LF 500 0.20 Lt-100 1.25 LF 100 1.25 LF 320 1.25 LF 320 1.25 LF 60 1.25 LI-60 1.25 liA 50 157.00 l-A 25 235.00 LA 25 235.00 LF 700 2.00 200 400.00 AC 1.5 1.50.00 I.R 150 3.50 SY 9.400 1.40 TN 3.0 1.50.00 AC 1.5 55.00 SY 200 1.50 TN 0.7 400.00 SI97.6I.5.15 LA 3 400.00 sno.oo LA 415.00 1 415.00 LA 1 5.50.00 1 550.00 LA 300.00 1 300.00 LA 1 500.00 1 500.00 I.F 4i0 23.00 300 6.900.00 LF 470 25.00 390 9.750.00 LF-684 31..50 612 19.278.00 LF !56 33.00 164 5.412.00 LA 2 500.00 1 000.00 LA 7 700.00 7 4.900.00 LA II 1.200.00 10 11000.00 Now Item iiiit ConlnKt Qumitity Pncr Tn l)»tr \MVHfflt To Diilf SP-5 ('mistnic* inki control stnjciurc IVsien 4-2. 4’ (Ji.i. SP-S Connect to extst. stonn manhole SP-9 Cut into existing storm sewer 2511.501 Random np rap. CL 111 - DIH.irTED Total H-Storm Sewer-SAP I52-I07-0I EA EA EA CY 1 2 1 28 1.150.00 .*00.00 800.00 0.00 l.l-'OOO Witl.oo ;noo<i 8M.8fi5.00 Watertown Road (*ulvcrt P.irt C- • .SAP 152-lO.VOI 2101.501 Clearing 2101.. 506 (inibhing 2104.501 Remove pipe culvert 2'04.505 Remove bituminous pavement 2104.. 509 Remove guard posts 0l05.b09 Cicotextile f.ibrie. Type V 2105.. 501 Common exeavation (P) 2105.521 (iraiiular borrow (( V') 2105.52.8 C'<mimon borrow (CV) 2105.5.15 Salvaged topsoil (CV) 2211.. 501 Aggregate b.Tsc. C1.5. 100^7 eruslied quarry rock 2221.. 501 Aggregate shouldering. Cl.xss 5 100'‘J crushed quarry rock 2111.504 AC-1 bit. material for mixture 2.111.508 Type 41 wearing course mixture 2111.514 Pyjic II b.xse course mixture SP-1 Hrivew.av restoration 2157.502 llituminous material for i.ick coat 2451.501 Structure exc.avaiioii. C'l U (P) 2451 511 Coarse filler .aggregate (CV') 2501.511 12" CM pipe culvert 1501.511 48" RC pipe culvcrl.a.4.IXs. 1006 2501.515 12" CM pipe .apron 1501.515 12" RC pipe apron 1501.515 48" RC’pipe apron 0501.M12 I r.ish guard for 48“ RC' pipe apron AC AC LI* SY l-A SY CY CY CY C'Y TN TN TN TN SY GT CY CY LI* LF EA Ea\ I: A EA RP-.1 OJ 0..1 64 IJOO 40 2.60) 1.450 600 1.000 100 U500 1.10 18 135 180 10 100 750 120 50 124 a I 2.000.00 2.000.00 20.00 1.25 10.00 1.00 1.50 10.00 6.1(0 6.00 8.50 10.00 115 00 17..50 16.00 10.00 1.00 4.00 14.00 24.00 140.00 70.00 400.00 1.270.00 950.00 Ile«i SP-7 Conslnicl inlet control structure. Design 4-2. 6* dia. 2511.501 Random rip rap. CL IV - DliLinni) 2554.501 Lraffie barrier. Des. MS507 25.M..509 (fuidc post. Tv]xr A 2554.511 Anchoring assembly - plaie beam 2554.52,1 Twisted end treatment 2563.601 Traffic control 0564.603 C wide solid line, yellow paint 0564.603 4" wide solid line, white paint 2573.503 Silt fence. prea.sscmblcd 2575.501 Roadside seeding 1575..502 Seed, mixture ^00 2575.505 Sodding, l ypc lawn 2575.51 1 Mulch material. Tv]>c I 2575.519 Disk aiichonng 2575.531 C'ommercial fertilizer, analysis 20-10.10 Total C-SAP 152103-01 Unit CARtmet QujiBlity Unit Price i:a 1 1.200.00 CY 28 0.00 u-500 10.00 \IA 82 25.00 IZ/\*0 200.00 EA y 450.00 \S I 5.000.00 I.F uoo 0.20 IJ-1.100 0.20 LF .100 2.00 A(0.4 200.00 I.H 40 3.50 SY 700 1..50 IN 0.8 150.00 AC 0.4 75.00 TN O.l 400.00 Qtimititv To Dale To Dal# so.oo Allcrnale Bid - Contractor shall bid cable cone, in lieu of random rip rap. Ba.se bid for rip rap will not be paid in this ca.se. Brown Road North Part B • Storm Sewer-SAP 152-107-01 SP-IO Cable concrete. C*C-20 rolal Part B - Storm .Sewer SF 5.00 SO.OO Watertown Road CuKert Part C ■ SAP 152-103-01 SP-11 Cable ccmcretc. Cc -35 Total P..rt C - Culvert SF 320 6.00 SO.OO RP-4 r liem Unit Cnntmct Qufinlily Vnk PHct Qujiiility To Dnte Arnovnl To Doto Total A • Street - SAP 152-107-01 Total n - Stomi Sewer-SAP 152-107-01 Total Part C - 152-IO.T-OI Total All. - Part H Total Alt. - Part C Total Work Completed to Date |Q7.M5.|^ .VT865.00 0,00 000 . 0.00 52M.5IO.I5 I t 'i \ PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner Project Project No. File No. Contractor City of Orono Brown Rd. Reconstruction / Wntertown Road CuK'crt SAP 152-107-01 / SAP 152-103-01 13972 Buffalo Bituminous CHANCE ORDERS No. Dot*Amount 1 Total Change Orders - Add PAYMENT SUMMARY No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 Period Start 10-1-94 10- 1-94 11- 8-94 Payment $18,536.40 229.898.24 Rclainage $975.60 13.075.51 Completed $19,512.00 261.510.15 Total Payment to Date Rctainage, Payment No. Total /Amount Earned $248,434.64 13.07.5.51 $261,510.15 Original Contract Change Orders Revi.scd Contract $566,506-50 0.00 $566,506-50 RP-6 r REQUEST FOR COUTSCIL ACTION Hov DATE: NovemnCT^;;l994 T - u. •*.; ITEM NO: j Department Approval: Name Ron Ntoorse Title Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed: //s Agenda Section: City Administrators Report Item Description: Status of Implementation of Auditor’s Recommendations for Internal Controls Attached is a memo from Chris Miller. Assistant Finance Director, outlining the changes that have been made in response to the Auditor’s recommendations regarding segregation of duties in the Finance Department. Each of the changes recommended by the Auditor have been implemented with the exception of items related to the Golf Course. These will be implemented at the start of the 1995 golf season. November 9, 1994 TO: FROM: RE: Ron Moorse /A Chris Miller ^ Update on Financial Internal Controls Ron, As agreed upon with the City's Auditors, the following changes have been made to improve the City's financial internal controls. Bank deposits are now processed when accumulated cash receipts on hand exceed $10,000. Previously, bank deposits were made at the end of the week, and when significantly large checks (i.e. HACA aid) were received. Add'l segregation of duties among the finance staff have also been implemented in preparing the bank deposit, and the bank reconciliation. The City now requires two signatures on all disbursement and payroll checks less than $5,000. Previously only one signature was required for checks of this amount. The City will still continue to have three signatures on checks in excess of $5,000. Utility receipts are now delivered to the Asst. Finance Director who prepares separate lists of both checks and remittance stubs. The checks are processed by the Asst. Finance Director, and the remittance stubs are entered against customer accounts by the Sr. Accounting Clerk. Transaction summaries are compared to make sure they are in balance. r w A r-/s' *' ''"fh.,^ '/AV. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Novem^:^1^994^9^ ^ ITEM NO: /•v^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Citv Administrators Report Item Description: Resolution Congratulating Championship the Orono High School Girls Tennis Team on their State The Orono High School Girls Tennis Team recently won the State Tennis Championship. A congratulatory letter was faxed to the team for celebration which was held on Monday, October 31. Council may want to adopt a resolution to more formally recognize the achievement of the team. A proposed resolution is attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution recognizing the Orono High School Girls Teimis Team for winning the State Championship. r RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE ORONO HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS TENNIS TEAM ON WINNING THE 1994 STATE TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS* the City of Orono continues to recognize excellent achievement of persons in its community, and WHEREAS* the Orono High School Girls Tennis Team has won the 1994 State Tennis Championship, and WHEREAS* the 18 members accomplished this goal through dedication, hard work and a team etfort. NOW* THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED* that the Orono City Council does hereby recognize the outstanding achievement of the Orono High School Tennis Team m winning the State Tennis Championship. Adopted by the City Council on this I4th day of November, 1994. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk (MCC1>VKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION OEEPHAVEN EXCELSIOR GREENWOOD LONG LAKE MEDINA MINNETONKA BEACH MINNETRISTA ORONO ST. BONIFACIUS SHOREWOOD SPRING PARK TONKA BAV VICTORIA WOODLAND 540 SECOND STREET • PO BOX 473 • EXCELSIOR. MN 55331-0473 612. 474-5539 • FAX 612. 474-0430 November 10, 1994 Mayor Edward Callahan City Council Members City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Callahan and Council Members: I'd like to begin by telling you that the 1995 Budget for the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC), was approved by all fourteen cities in our Joint Powers Ag: eement. This process has taken Jim Daniels, our Administrator, and respective Commissioners over two months to personally meet with the various city councils and explain the goals for 1995. Your support is always critical and welcomed by the LMCC as we work to represent the current and future needs of the residents in Orono. There have been several important events taken place since Jim Daniels spoke to you, and I would like to briefly list them for your information: -Triax Cablevision has been required, by FCC direction, to honor the request of all local broadcast channels to be carried on the "basic” Tier I of cable service. UHF channel 53 (KVBM - St. Cloud, MN) has filed that formal request and the cable company has complied. Triax Cablevision is carrying KVBM channel 53 on cable channel 14 and has moved the Weather Channel to cable channel 53. This does not represent a loss to many subscribers siijLce over ninety-eight percent (98%) of all customers have'^the Satellite Tier II level of service. It does, however, utilize some valuable channel space, since the cable system is technically limited to fifty-four (54) channels. The LMCC will monitor this very closely. -The League of Cities has officially passed support for potential legislation in the upcoming 1995 Minnesota State Legislature. This will promote more than one provider of communications to our cities, yet have them meet identical technical, construction, local programming and franchise fee standards. Our Administrator, Jim Daniels, has been very active and influential in gaining this League of Cities support. r -Triax Cablevision has filed another ’’corrected” FCC Form 1200. Because the cable company's filing has important rate considerations, the LMCC has exercised its right to toll the review period for an additional ninety (90) days. During that time, the cable company must submit additional information to refine and justify the data contained in the new FCC Form 1210 filing. The LMCC staff, accountants and legal counsel currently have this under review. Once again, we want to keep you as up-to-date on this information as possible. If during this process you have any questions or simply want more detailed information, you may call Jim Daniels at the LMCC office (474.5539). Thanks again for your support of the LMCC, and we look forward to an exciting 1995. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Timothy Chairman TS/lh cc Commissioner Tim Pattrin r ‘'6 % REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <3e ^ DATE; NovemH^^ ITEM NO: i i Departme.'t Approval: ^ Name Tom Kuehn Title Finance Director , Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Seetion: Citv Administrator’s Report Item Description: ApfK)int Insurance Agent of Record tor 1995 Attachment: Agent ot Record Agreement The agent of record agreement 'vith Mr. Duweyn Carlson of th; Apple Valley Instance Agenev renews on January 1st. The service fee for 1995 is $7,1‘80, an increase ot 3 /o, and is included in the 1995 insurance budget. The agent fee is stated at a gross ai^ount but is reduced bv anv commissions earned through the policy premiums paid by the City. For example the fee'for service in 1994 was S7.650. however, the net direct cost to the City after applying the commissions earned was S4242. As part of the 1995 budget process, staff indicated it may be possible to reduce the cost ot the insurance agent f y staff taking on this responsibility. In pursuing this, staff tound that this could only be done through a staff person becoming certified as an insurance agent. The time and expense required to do this led statf to determine that the current arrangement with the insurance agent should be retained for 1995. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council appointment of Mr. Duweyn Carlson. Apple Valley Agency, as insurance agent of record for 1995. PROPOSED MOTION: - Moved by.____. seconded by,-------, to appoint Mr. Duwevn Carlson. Apple Valley Agency, as Insurance Agent of Record tor 1995, at a tee not to exceed S7,880, including any commissions earned on policy premiums paid by e City. Aves . Nays ___ r K CITY OF ORONO AGENT OF RECORD AGREEMENT Duweyn P. Carlson of the Apple Valley Agency agrees to perform the following services for the City of Orono: 1. The negotiation and placement of all the required insurance; 2. Information on relevant changes in insurance markets, products and services; 3. Asfistance in developing comprehensive insurance coverages; 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Provide an insurance policy inventory and summary; A complete accounting of commissions earned (direct only) on the account; A cumulative five-year premium and loss record; Prepare an allocation of premium by department as required by the City; Loss exposure list and classification; up-dated annually; Assist with all claims and losses; 10. Assistance in minimizing premiums; reviewing and auditing rating basis, fonnulas, etc. 11. Assistance in loss prevention engineering and loss control; 12. Willingness to keep an in-agency record of looses including reserves established; 13. Assist the City in Risk Management program. The fee for serv'ice for the Insurance Policy year 1995 will be $7,880.00 and will cover the following; 1. Conduct an Exposure survey and prepare specifications 2. Obtain quotes 3. Review policies, billings and claims CHY or OROM) AGENT or RECORD A<;REE.\IE.Vr 2 The Cay aptes le pMj S3.940 00 Jclorn o( the ^ haUnce of S3.W 00. kn cofnmmioiis received. Axurnemed pre^enuth.xi This ^reement is valid fix the caktidar yeaf IW APPLE VALLEY AGENCY Dale Dtiweyn Cartsoo 5 tEQClST P COi^a 4CTIOX DATE: Ni rmi!4o cv. \ i TMt PeaiK w«rfct Ometur Aduduimiur lUsIrued: ,'y '1 AfMida SfCttir ^gNi4 Worikt IM Pmcriptiau: ErptipincBi PWchaac Puts Dunng dit 1993 19« rccicMiooil losoo. « was <imnBMed U mh h > MXon^nA he»f Ed lo he deaMd hcotr praif lo fW»itinf I We keep* I purchased COt?«CIL ACTION Ik cscepiioii of a cab for the openan's fa» factory, a i3 cqaii « The for the • I 111 I ,isr MotkMi to approve the purchase of a cab attachmnu for the skatinf rwk ckM a cost am ID eiceed 13.000. to be ftBufcO from the equipiiicm outlay hind equipment ai ch J r y.REQiTSl nm CIHM'It %C'TIO\ D4TE: N4n«rehc( £ 1D*M^ •:? imM %o.; I 7 . ‘"^<r M Cl l^lNx •orti Ilcai tocfiptlMK Strtti tigiR Rcqnm Ciy Cr>^ Bi> R«^ inJ 0«yM> Riiad 6 I lav« rcccoitt received « m|iK«i for a ftrcct liftM al the nmneettoa of Old Cr>^ Bay Road ai C ommy R o^ 6 Thai lacnccUMi ii fcnoi hy Wnght Iknnertn Electric The coil for the focct tiihi a a 130 00 one tone chatfe for the HHiallaiitiii of a tnwAinner and Si 40 per moadi for decmcRy Curmaly there ue federal Meet lights teoughoiit the Cay The policy icvenl yean ago was tiM lesKkms nooid pctatioii for siieci ti^ ant the Ci^ would asm the costs to the bcneBtuig property tmoen The taw chaaged re^rding asaancm aakan n mandatory K* levy the assessmmi every year which reifuircd a pu Mk heanag This dal aoc sccra cost cflkiefit and the etectriciiy coals were then paid foi from the general foad. However, there are many 'private* meet *ighu that were hjr NSF for a icsideai hecaase the light may serve only a haadfhl of lestdentt. NSP Mb It is rcconaaended that, hecause the propoMd light would serve a wider puMc pur] he funded through the fcneral fund budget the cost COt^CIL ACTION BEQtCSTED: Motion to approve the installatioa of a street light at the intersection of CHd Cry stal Bay Road and County Road 6. with the 150 00 one-tmie installatKxi cost and the li.sO per mooch electncity cost to be paid from the Cay 's general fund Corkv Fiiil Marketing Ortobrf 2S. 19M Mr. lolm OrhaniMMi MN S9J23 Drar Joha* TYiank ym for «rtth »* odirr day. Prr ywa rtqiitrt dila Wtirr wifi to cofilinn mv convcrtaifoci with you. I am thr father of thfte dUldftn who attend Onmo Khool»^ and a ttfong nipporter and actiee porlidpant of all the event! that occur hi the Orono tchool coRiplex. I am «eritinK this letter in behalf of both Mudent! and adults who need to p«a through the Inienectton of OWCryualBay Road and Ca Road b. SpcdAcaily. I am informing you of the need for a street l^ht on this corner. When driviM on Co. Road t, it Is extremely <fiffkult to see where to turn onto Old Crystal Bay Road, and ever, more difRcuit to see cars or bikes. This Is especially true in the winter montlw when it grts dark in the Ute afternoon and the snow Heiub everything together. Abo, I believe the potential for a tragedy to occur wiU be hei^tened when the new buebaU fiekb are in use next yw. lohn, please bring this to the attention of the appropriale people in the Oono administration. I am available to discuss this furtlw should it be helpful. Otherwise, please inform me ai your decision. And thank 3fou tor yoitf sincere help! Best Perscmal Regards, CUi^-4' C. A C<a«V Hall OCT 31 199+ MrfTOfpffi Avt’nut* • \\tnnrjpoti*. I’h.xieM: n»• fj*f.i; r - / > •EQitsT rcHi cm'Wtt kvrmns ^ ^ '4ijy ^ ' I* lun:: "ffimMyuo: ■ * ^ CHJ i£_v ♦ « i ♦ PrapoMd IW5 Mcctof Sctel The (MoiKlfcd IW HKCMi tctoMe » jmchcd ' r Cornea tr^wm Hi*% «cHc«telr b»s *»v» l«fi pfwrfwi K» iIk Pl«w«f C«jmm»w ant l*arti Comnmmm ftir tfir* ro«« If ttv Cornea In* «w conccim Obam. dK pwywcd «liiA*lc. Ae CoMned'a comamm* *% •til a» ihte L jinimwi frrm dn PI imh^ anJ Pvk C«imtm«>iw will he rrflnica « a re%Hcd «cheilttk to be i^fivo««il m tbt Nomher 2m Cnmcd nccfiai No icttiMi rcfanttfif the amtHif ictwhile is rv(|iieste«S ai il^s inns: it. 4 1995 ilKOMM m tlM IIM, M III IH I I•fr. -9r-Ki:>n TJi f.Jk|. C oMiiri \tfrimt 2md & «li \|i«HLi«7:15 l*.M. Pjrii Cg—litMwwX CNIkiil IMMli;Januaiy S 7 1419 20 21 25 26 27 28 May S M r W 1 A 37 Jil 9 10 14 (fSlie 17 T 4 11 18 F 5 12 5 6 13 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 30 31 Septembef M T W T F 1 7 8 14 15 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 6 12 13III S 2 9 16 13 10 FetxuaryS M T5 A 712 UIm 19 x(2J 26t!7l28 W T F S 12 3 48 9 10 1115 16 17 18 22 23 24 25 Juno S M T W T 1 4 5 A 7 8 11 52113 14 15 18Q9)20 21 22 25y6l27 28 29 Oclotxjf F 2 9 16 23 30 S 3 10 17 24 S 5M I W T F 1 2 A 4 5 C / 8 Olio 11 12 13 M 15Q017 18 19 20 21 22^24 25 26 2/ 2B 29 30 31 S M T5A 712 1^14 19Cffi21 W161522 I F ? 3 9 10 16 \7 23 24 S4111825'6 £^28 29 30 31 Juh S M T W T r s 2 3 I 6 7 8 9 EH " 'iT'n 14 15 16Q018 19 20 21 22 23^25 26 27 28 29 30 31 November S M T 5 12 19 w r F s Av 12 3 4 JtK / 8 9 Itfll 14 If. Ui U 18 21 22 >srX 25 ifii]m I 26\^28 29 30 ApnlS M r W T F2 A 4 5 6 79 ffmil 12 13 M leffo 18 19 20 21 23^25 26 27 28 29 30 August S M 6 13 20 27 / ’5 1 W 1 F s 1 A 3 4 5 8 TiO 11 12 IS 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 31 S December M T W T 3 A 5 6 7 8 9 loWl2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24>CX 27 28 29 30 31 r m mm i ’ •• • - •- <*. ^ • ,' -^‘Sv I?"- -.i-*4^ Vfc^, v**'*' 5AY5 1995 Suncoy Jo^oo»v ' ^ndov Jor^uOiV ^ 0 . 5unc^Oy 1 2 • ^uesocy feOo»or/ 1 4 Monoov f^t>njoy 20 ^MnejoQy Mo^cf» < Vorcfoy Mcrch 6 ^noov Vofcn t 7 5uncoy Aoni Q ^''!dOv Aon* 14 Sot^rdov AcrW iunocv A OP. . SvjPCCv AonJ 23 5urcov Mov 14 v<o'"ccv Vcv 22 Voncoy Mcy 2Q ^Mr^sooy jun# 14 Sundoy vur# 16 Sofufdcy ;u^/ t . Tu^sdoy Jla a Monooy 5#ot^fhb#r4 Vonricy September 25 . ir'ednesdoy Ocrobe^ 4 ^O^COy . vcp *:cv 'vescov ^wesocy . SocurOOy ^^undOy Moncov Moncoy ^uescov ctcoe- V Cctcoe^ Q Ccrroer 3^ ^<a*/emcef '* ^cr^ember " 1 November 23 Decemoef • 6 Cecember 25 3e<emoe' 26 r %-•' ■* I j. 5ro« y«ar to f»t with th« Oalane* O^lny lost on Ooeoabar 3lat« onloti oth«rwia« approvoA hy tho A4«inittrator. Adept*4 l/14/fl ?h« Baalaao vacation allowtd to bo paid out on toraination ta thirty (30) dayt. $97j^ 1. tbo City ahall obaorvo tho following aa official holidaya for all r«9ular fuU*tiM osployooa: Slow Toar*a Say ?tartin l.atJ»f Kinf’a llrthday 7r«aidonta* Say Moaorial Say Indoporuloneo Say Labor Day Coluabua Say or Friday afttr Fhankaglvin^* votorana* Say Thanaaplvinf say Chriataaa Say In additon tboy aba 11 roeoivo ono poraonal holiday to bo aehodalod and approved in tho aaao nannor aa vacation. * Aa dotorninod by Sopartsont Hoad and approved by tho Adainiatrator. 2. All regular full*ti»o onployooa will bo ontitlod to roeoivo pay for official holidaya, at their noraal atraifht tine ratoa. laployooa on aict leave cr vacation ahall receive holiday pay. Holiday pay ahall not bo earned by any employee durin9 a leave of abaonee without pay, auaponaion or tiae othorwiao not worhod or paid or othorwiao not eoapenaatod. 3. Honooaeapt regular full-time eaployeea who are required tc wort on a holiday ahall receive an additional time ai^ a half pa^ in addition to their noraal holiday pay for houra actually %forited. depending on thoir eligibility aa apecified in the proviaiona fo: overtime in the Coaponaation Plan or ahall receive another day of: in liew of the holiday at the diacretion of the Department Read. 30H. Slot HAVl 1. Eligibility for aict leave ia authorixed abaence from dut with pay, granted to regular eaployeea who meet certai requirements. Sict leave is not to be used at the d is ere t ion c the employee. Side leave shall be allowed only in case c necessity and actual need aa explained below. All regular ful.. tiae eaployees shall accumulate eight (S) houra of paid aid* per month, not to exceed a total of nine hundred sixty (96C hours. 2. Sid* leave shall not be earned by any employee during a lea^ r REQti:ST FOR COl NCIL ACTION DATE: November 8. 19^ ITEM NO: DrpartOMM Approval: Naaw Ron Mootsc TMr Cit> Administraior AdmiiUstralor Reviewed: fv /•7 /\genda cay A R«pon* t A Item Deacripiloo: Navarre Water Plant Study "%>> BKkgfSMiKi When suff and Council retemly discussed a proposed engineering study ot the Navarre water plant Council expressed concerns regarding the co>i of the snidy in relation to the projected cost of the rehabiltution work. Suff has, since then, met with Bonestroo to review the swdy usks (see attached) and to determine whether the proposed study costs are reasonable. The review of snidy tasks indicated that a portion of the study dealing with the basic rehabiliution of the plant (items 1. 2. 3. 4 and 6) is a lessor part of the toul cost (approximately S5.000). The major cost items are numbers 5 and 9 which are an analysis of the current and alternative water treatment methods and processes. Study Purposes and Results If the city simply wanted to determine which items in the water plant need to be replaced or repaired the cost of this study would be approximately $5,000 However, given the substantial expenditure level of the rehabiliution project, it is imporunt the project accomplishes more than simply replacing equipment. The water plant is now 20 years old. The plant has not had any significant upgrading during this 20 year period. Ii is important that as we now prepare to conduct a major rehabiliution project we put sufficient effort into ensuring the plant equipment and treatment processes will meet the city’s long term needs as well as current water system regulations. It is imporunt that the rehabiliution of the plant enables the system to comply with new regulations, specifically the copper/lead rule. There are several options, including using different processes for treating the water or adding chemicals to limit the tendency of copper to dissolve into the water. The majority of the study costs are related to analyzing these options, and providing an option that most effectively meets i.ie city’s needs. RFP Option As part of the discussion of the cost of the study the Council questioned whether the city normally takes bids on projects of this magnitude and whether the city should conduct an RFP process for this study. The city does generally take bids on m.ijor equipment items and construction projects. However, the city generally does not conduct RFP processes for individual legal or engineering services. Although the city would very probably benefit from the periodic jse of an RFP process for overall engineering work, or for engineering work related to very large projects such as road reconstruction or saniury sewer projects, it is not cost effective to conduct an RPP process for a smaller engineering study. In the specific case of the water plant study, staff does not recommend an RFP process due to Bonestroo's knowledge of the water plant and the background already performed by Bonestroo as part of the copper/lead desk-top study. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to authorize Bonestroo to proceed with the water plant study it a cost not to exceed $16,450 mm Bonestroo Rosene AnderliIcA Associates Inglwttri A ArchHcctt Jiiae 14. 1994 City of Oromo Cky Hail P-O. Boa 66 Crystal Bay Ofono. MN 55323 C rt i kMto l*t Swi u»<«< 6 C*aA ffMA I NMora G **1 W.«>M fOMi HJMbw ^ ' » ar4T« 4 OMttJUM ''t i ''t ^ K.oo< LXtfMi o ui«Ma i. a^jkira 4 i a 4 »'! 4*«a 4 rt I floMOHjra. rt lr>j a M Urnmttm • 4i«r*miPi 4 • a IfiMM A V4». Kt i W« <■ i| r*t *w>Mr« rn^Mmmrg f*| mk»^ r «l<m i»t ••w> Ml iv«r« w.. • i * i.* i |f< « I ' • V 4 44j^^ *'| *r*‘ k L5 4V»i/^ r r | ^%44 Ati^^k rt J* Aiv^kkO' •'I Mji% ■ la^ Mn ** 4 >r%i **t « -^9 Mr r| •«i^ i 4ia « -liMn • t«a^i«c«< *>1 ^ oa* VraciM r| M<a«« j C^MMra n M N* u «*•*% Pt ma % a It t'l ^ V >•« t't • ^ »k^A. t . »» ' t kt «l • t ♦ I < * ua < * ^ ^'1 • li «M. « ft • ' 1•%« • • t r ^ « •*!--■ r I v4#t •* <««.•-! t • ' •»•’« 4 I • » t ' «< M • Mtar • ft ^ «ftwft • M V a^«i .«tt« \ * I I «vflftA Anemior.: Mr. JoIm Gerliar Re: Water Tmnneni Plaoi Evaluaiioii BRA File No. 139 GEN Dear JoIm: We appfociai.4 the lime you. Jack and Wayne spent wkk Scott Ward and me. Thnnday. May l9.discusMnf the Lead and Copper Desk Top Study and the City’s water iiemmem laciliiy. We are happy to report that the fim phase of yoor desk lop study will be iloiie in ilie very near future. Durinf our meetiiig, the a|pe. condition and functions of the City's water ireatment facility was contemplaled and the continued use of the existing zeolite solteiicrs was debated. As a resuh of the discussions, we have prepared this proposal to pcildnti a Water Treatment Facility Evaluation of the City’s plant. The City’s need to have an evaluation performed on their water ireatment facility exists because of the sheer age of the plant and the physical condition of ilie filter unit and eledrical coiMiols. The product of this evaluation will be a report that identifies any deliciertcies discovered and makes recommendations for their repair or replacenicni. Wc ask that you review this proposal with your staff and Council in order to devclo|) a consensual understanding os to why the time lias come for Orono to review the status and reliability of their water treatment facility. WATER TREATMENT FACILITY KVAMTA*nON Scope:Our proposed scope for this project is described in deuil below: I. Evaluate tlie physical condition of the facility's structure, ruolmg and electrical controls. 2.Review the functioiMliiy and perfunnance of the mechanical and electrical systems. 5;;:, fj f:0? 2335 \Mnt Hlgbiway 36 • Sc. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 r 0 5. 7. 8 9 10. Inspect the inlerk>r surfaces and equipmciu inside the filtniiKM) aiul softenii^ uaiis. Sample and inspect the filler media, support j^ravels and /eoliie granular medias. FaciUlaie water quality samplii^ and testing of the raw water, filtered water, softened water and fmislied water streams. Tliis will ilicn Ik* used to assemble a "procets*wise” water cuality scIkmiuhc. Determine the hydmilic capacity of the filtration unit, zeolite solteiiers and plant piping. Faciliiaie a pointed survey of the Navane water cu.stomers to determine the number of point-of-eniry water softeners that arc in use. The nesults may give some indication of tlie need for iIk* exi.Ming zeolite softeners at the water plant. Tabulate and review the quantity of chemicals used annually. Propose and evaluate possible means of reducing tlie amount of dissolved oxygen being intiwhiced in the aeraikm/filier inki portion of the filtration unit. The cost of these options is to be compared to the costs of feeding chemical corrosion inhibitors for reductioii of copper. Prepare a draft report of the project findings and recommendations fur review with the City staff. liK’luded will lie cost estimates of all improvement items. Prepare final report. Pciivttibte;Fifteen (LS) copies of the Water Treatnient Facility Evaluation Report Con^nsaii We propose to perform this work for a lump sum amount of S16.4S0. It is our feeling that mid to late Fall would be the best time to proceed with this project because any improvement work could then be completed by early Spring. We cx|iect tliat troprovemeni costs for the water plant will vary depending on tlieir nature and ex;eiil. If the iropfovemenis are only replacement of filler media and repainting of tlie building interior, the costs are likely not to exceed $60,000. If, however, this work is r with replacement of some electrical controls and installation of an effective d^uniiditlj system to control condensation and corrosion, the improvement r $90,000. For loul project budfciim pmpoies. it might be pnidem to allocaie $105,000 m We It is very hive hid time to qnfrtnwi ami coecerm Ymin verytnily. system needs. we provide the very best service to our clienis, so after you comentt of this Icner, we would like to heir your comments, presented. 1*00, KOSfiNE. ANDGRLDC * ASSOCIATES, INC Miles B. Jeasee, F.B. cc: Gleoe Cdoh Ted Field Dick FoAer REOtllST FOR COUNCIL ACTIOIS % t DATE: November 10* ITEM NO: qP.Q PPIm Adninistr^or Reviewed: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administnaor /A Afenda Section: City Administrators Report Item Description: Scheduling of a Public Hearing Regarding an Ordinance Regulating Personal Watercraft on Long Lake The five step process for putting an ordinance in place which regulates the surface use of the lake are as follows: 1. 3. 4. 5. Development of a proposed ordinance. Hold a public hearing regarding the ordinance. Adopt the ordinance.m Submit the proposed ordinance and supporting documentation to the DNR The DNR reviews the ordinance and either approves or denies it. A proposed ordinance regulating the surface use of Long Lake, and specifically personal watercraft on Long Lake, is attached. This ordinance has been given conceptual approval by the city council’s of both Orono and Long Lake. The ordinance has been preliminarily reviewed by a DNR staff person who indicated that the restrictions in the ordinance are not outside the realm of reasonableness if the cities ca.i provide substantial documentation of the need for the restrictions. The next step is for the cities of Orono and Long Lake to hold a public hearing to obtain public input regarding the ordiiunce. The Long Lake City Council has requested that a joint public hearing be held, since each city will need to adopt the ordinance in order for it to be placed into effect. The city of Long Lake has indicated that a joint public hearing held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday. December I2 just prior to the Orono CouiKil meeting would work for them. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to set a date and time for a public hearing regarding the ordinance regulating the use of personal watercraft on Long Lake. L AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE StWACE USE OF LONG LAKE Section 1. Purpose, Imert. and Application As authorized by Miiuiesoca Statutes 86B.201, 86B.205, and 459.20. as now in effect and is hercaBer amended, thn oidinance is enacted for the purpose and with the intent to control and regulate the use of the waters Loi^ Lake in Hennepin County, cities of Long lakg and Orono. Miimesoa. said bodies of water beii^ located entirely within the boundaries of the cities of Long Lake and Orono, to pr LfiTi:e its lullest use and enjoymeiM by the public in general and the ckizens of Long Lake and Orono in particular; to insure safety for persons and property in coimectioa with the use of said waters; to e the general health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Loi^ Lake and Orono, Minnesou Section 2. Definitions. Lake” means th* lake known as Loi^ Lake located in the cities of Orono and Long Lake B Personal watercraft” means a watercraft which uses a motor powering a water jet pump as its primary source of motive power, and whkh is designed to be operated by a person sitting, standing or kneeling on. rather than the conventional manner of sitting or standing inside, the watercraft Section 3. Maximum Speeds No person shall operate a watercraft on the Lake at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and with regard to the actual and potential hazards (hen existing In every event speed shall be so restricted as may be necessars to avoid colliding with an> person, watercraft or stnicture in or upon the Lake which is in compliance with legal requirements and the dut> of all persons to use due care. No watercraft may be operated on the Lake at a speed in excess of the foUowing limits: (b) (c) 40 miles per hour (hiring the daytime; 20 miles per hour (hiring the nighttime; 3 miles per hour in the following areas; i) ii) iii) a quiet waters area esuMished by this section that im witlnn 150 feet of the shoieline. that aiea within 150 feet of an authorized bathing area or swinmer. an authorized scuba diver’s warning flag, an anchored raft or watercraft, or a dock or pier except that from which a watercraft with a person in tow is being operated. Section 4. Personal Watercraft. Subd. I. Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to operate a personal watercraft or for the owner thereof to permit the operation of a personal watercraft on the Lake in any way which is contrary to the provisions of this Code or the laws, rules or regulations of the state Subd. 2. Hours of Operation. No person shall <?PgriIg-&l1 watercraft between 6:00 p m. and 8:00 p m. the following daY. Subd. 3. Wake Jumping No person operating a personal watercraft shall jump the wake of another watercraft within 100 feet of that watercraft. This includes the wake of another personal watercraft. Subd 4. Renul Am penon who offers persotui watercraft for rent: (a) shall not rent a personal waoercraft. refardless of the horsepower, to any person who b less than 16 years of age or who is 16 years of age or over but less than 18 years of age and not in possession of an operator's permit required by law. Subd. 5. .Smutanenus Multiple Use. Two or more il watercraft shall i MK 8 course", ot . simultaif Section 5. Noise. No person shall operale any watercraft or boat on the Lake which is capable of exceeding a noise level on the A scale measured an a disiance of 50 fret or more from the watercraft or boat of: (a) 84 decibels in the case of marine engines or motorboats manufactured before January 1. 1982; or (b) 82 decibels in the case of marine ei^ines or motorboats manufactured on or after January 1, 1982; or (c) 82 decibels in the case of personal watercraft water jet pump engines mamifactured after January 1. 1992. Section 6. Enforcement. The enforcemetM of this ordinance shall be the primary responsibility of the peace officers of the Heiuiepin County Sheriff s Department or the Orono Police Department. Other licensed peace officers including Conservation Officers of the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota, and volunteer members of the Hermepin County Water Patrol are also authorized to enforce this ordinance Section 7. All authorized Resource Manageniem. Emergency and Enforcement Personnel. while acting in the performance of their assigned (hities are eaempt from the foregoing restrictions Section 8. It shall be die responsibility of the cities of Loi« Lake and Orooo to proside for notification of the puMk. whkh shall include placement of a sign at each pubik watercraft launching facility outlinhig essential elements of the ordinance, as well as the placement of necessary buoys and signs. Section 9. Penalties. Any person who violates the provisions of thb ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by 90 days incarceration and/or a $700.00 fine or both. >^flopied this____day of____________1994. by the city council of the City of Orono. Edward J. Callahan. Jr.. Mayor ATTEST Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk 0720W5 REQiDST rOR COt>'CIL ACTION DATE ITEM NO: ^1 :: 111 Ron Moon« TRk City Admmistralor Ciiv Conmcted Sump Pump Inspector When the Hunp pump inflection ontinance and program were brought to the Council, suff indicaied the inipectioa program could be accomplished with in-house staff. Although for the most pan this b still the case, as the plaiB for the program wete finalized two factors have led staff to request authorization to use a contracted impector to perform some of the inspections One factor is that those households widi all adult members working outside of the home may find it ver>' difficult to schedule inspections duriif normal work hours. It may be necessary to provide inspections at more convenient times. Although it may be possible to redesign the work schedules of the in-house inspection suff to accommodate this, much more flexibility could be provided using a contracted inspector. The second factor b that although the Building & Zoning suff have committed to scheduling time for the inspection program, they are fuiding that although building activity normally slows in winter months thb hiu not yet been the case this year. In fact we were recently advised that 10 townhomes are scheduled to be constructed in Spring Park over the winter (Orono suff provides plan review and inspection services to the city of Spring Park.) The higher level of activity responsible for keeping the inspection suff busier thar normal also results in a higher level of revenues than anticipated. The revenue to fund the requested contracted inspector position would c(xne from the resenue in excess of the budgeted amounts generated by the higher than normal building activity. The building related revenues are projected to be substamially beyond the budgeted amounts. The city of Shorewood used contracted inspectors for its sump pump inspection program. The inspectors were paid $10.00 per inspection. It is recommended the city enter into a similar arrangement for contracted inspections at a cost not to exceed $5,000. This would provide for up to 500 inspections. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the use of a contracted inspector to assist with the sump pump inspection program at a cost not to exceed $5,000. REQii:ST FOR COt>€IL ACTION if ty r^. TMc Dorothy Kal'.m Ciiv Clerk ItCHi Ucacriptton: List of Uccmcs for Council Approval Home occupation Charles Owen Anderson 1295 Loan Linda Avenue %«> PATE: Novcmb^^ljL 1994 ITEM NO: Liccinn COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve licenses listed tdx>ve ( rrv OK <)K(»NO (iKNKKAl. I.ICKNSK 2526Name of Bu»«f«e*$Howe OccupationCharles Owen AndersonPrincipal Owner: —1295 Loma Linda AvenueAddressOrono, MN 55364 Phone: 472-5481 Datr Issued October 10, 1994Date Empires September 30, 1995State License NoAs a condition of receiving this license, the licensee shall furnish the C.tv with a satisfactory surety bond and liability property damage insurance, iwhen required by the City Code. ^ shall have complied with ail the requirements of the City of Orono. per taining to the particular type of activity or business licensed This license is non transferableKIND OK LK'KNSKX Home Occi^tion Septic System Installation and/or Pumper Garbage Hauter ResidentuM Kennel Commercial Kennel Total Amount Paid to City CITVoMHNM'O f O tox 66 CRYSTAL BAY. MINNESOTA 553?3 PHONE 473 7357 White - File Copy Sigrtature of City Official Lyle i^man, Bu;Building Official Yellow - LicensN fft >/ .. 'i-<- - ‘■•'* ICIL CHECK REGISTER Wed Oct 26 1994CmCK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 00:12:37VENDOR Pag* 1DESCRIPTIONACCOUNT N INVOICE PO NUM.MANUAL0317991994/10/26 $5,406.00$5,406.00*CITY COirNTY CREDIT UNI SAVINGS W/H 1. TKSFRD 9999-2030 0010840319001994/10/26 $9,195.77$9,195.77*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF W/H FED TAX,FICA,MED 9999-2030 0010850311011994/10/26 $2,612.76$2,812.76*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP CITY SHARE FICA.MEDC 9999 2032 0010860310021994/10/26 $36,277.17$36,277.17*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP MET PAYROLL TRANSFER 9999-2030 0010830310031994/10/26 $2,762.79$2,762.79*MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVB STATE TAXES W/H 9999-2030 001087$56,454.49-- • a ^n-m:If> mmm. P0m fc“'.«sH^!''!?;>; * .■- '' >-'r^ ■ pylll 5y;>'?-rw h l-iAi '■i- Lr»9ifv.h'^\ TJ":-..A A *Lg ■ ■ .ni >■a-- *■- rv V.'.COUNClb CHECK REGISTER Mod Mov 9 1994 00.08:37aiBCK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDORA T fc T DESCRIPTION LEASE 10/2Z-01/22/95 ACCOUNT N 0590-4320 INVOICE00201 r>PO NUM.Pag* 1 HANUAL......oil 1Iirl0318070318081994/11/141994/11/14 $19.55$19.55*$10.65$10.65*A-1 MINNETONKA RENT PROPANE C.AS 0249-4220onoo91994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 $357.07$35.00$69.r<4$461.61*ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC ALL STAR ELECTRIC REPAIR FLAG POLE LIG SEMIPHORE LIGHT OUT REPLACE LIGHT HWY 12 0099-43430249-42320249-43420310101994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 1.200.90 1.506.70 4.526.00 7.233.60*AMERICAN ENGINEERING T GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE AMERICAN ENGINEERING T L.S. 87 CONSULTING AMERICAN ENGINEERING T OCB BRIDGE 0249-43050569-43050355-43050318111994/11/14 $166.00$166.00*ASP AMMO FOR TRAINING 0129-4241it'-t'5-a.'-, ‘ ■031812031013 1994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 $31.42jl31.42$31.42S31.42$31.42$157.10*•ATATATATAT t666fc TTTTT INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM INFO SYSTEM LEASE'NOV LEASE-NOV LEASE-NOV LEASE-NOV LEASE-NOV ‘0069-43400249-43400059-43400174-43400129-43401994/11/14 $44.05$44.05*ATfcT INFO SYSTEM LEASE-NOV ■ ^5 i ■f'03181S 4-y •»?" 031116 031814 1994/11/141994/11/14 1994/11/14 $161.57$67.34 $279.86 $508.77* BLACKONIAK fc SONS BLACKOHIAK fc SONS BLACKONIAK fc SONS CITY HALL. PH, POLIC GOLF COURSE CONT BY LAKE "'n.-'<1 1994/11/14 $69.57 $69.57* BRC-ASSIST CENTER OPTICAL SCANNING FOR 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 $8.50 $8.50 $17.00* BRINKHAUS-JACK BRINKHAUS-JACK MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEN 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 $1.86 $19.68 $21.54* BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING LARGE COPY MADE PRINT ROAD SIGNS esuia 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 29.830.00 18.536.40 ;48.366.40* BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC PAYMENT Ml-OCB RD BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC PAYMENT Ml • BROHN R 19«4/11/14 $5 53 CELLULARONE CELL PHONE-NBH TRUCK a > ^:’r -'-V. •li'iirfiwwiti' 0129-43400099-43430590-4343 0290-4343 0040-4210 0569-4381 0549-4381 0129-4322 0249-4233 0361-4532 0360-4532 0569-4320 156709267-259272-349272-3394186894204941510002041521605862952160586295216058629521605862952160586295216057118153398153452 153424 4119881 002050 002050 46453 46438 002033 002034 002014 OHOHOHOHOHOHOH*onOHOHOH ^__ Awa ¥ -rw- - - COUNCIL ClIBCK REGISTER Wed Nov 9 CHBCK NO ClIBCK DATE CIIECK AMOUNT 199<l 00:08:37VENDOR Pag« 21994/11/14;994/ll/l4tm « •031824F .031825Y.-:^v A. ;Y-.i '031826 - r >' ‘, ■ . ■ f., ' 031827 '■E 031828 V:031829 1994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 03M10 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 y.; kf- OSlill 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 ^ V V' . ■; . ' • I - iji '■ if>•‘V #.r. wmmm. $r>.53 $40.Bl$r.i$19S.B5 $195.as*$114.17$114.17*I566.52566.52*$391.52$391.52*$189.87$189.87*$90.00$15.00$105.00*I5.265.005,265.00*$527.40 $527.40* 947.93 $47.93* $15.00 $15.00* $146.97 $711.42 $71.36 $72.42 $464.34 $875.43 $2,341.94* $10.45 $11.25 $29.70* $136.82 $47.49 $77.59 CBI.I.UI.AKONK(:Ei.t.iii.AKnNi-:ciiUNK.'^ <:ahA(;eCOMMERCIAL ASHIAl. COMPCOMMISSIONER TRANSCONNELLY INDUSTRIAL El. COPY DUF PH INCD.M.J. CORPORATION D.M.J. CORPORATIONB-Z RBCYCLING BARL P ANDERSON ASSC BNGLISII IRVING BRICKSON/KURT BS8 BR0THBR8 6 B88 BROTHERS 6 BSS BRaniBRS k ESS BROTHERS k BSS BROTHERS k BSS BROTHERS 6 SONS SONS SONS SONS SONS SONS EXPRESS MESSENGER EXPRESS MESSENGER G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G fc K SERVICES DIWKIPTION ACCOUNT 8 INVOICK PO NUM.MANUAL<t:li. phone new truck DM9-1320 002011 OH*('EI.L PHONE ilERHARDSO 0219 4320 0O2010 OilWATKR VmV H16 6 0129 1311 5070I-:OHASPHALT0219-4233 002032 OH 4•’1!EUC, K INSP ncB RD 035!^ 1305 125370 Oil ■4-1REPI.ACR TRANSFORMER 0569*4311 3101 OH 1NOV LEASE 0129*4332 2020009 OH '16 LOADS ASPHALT 0219*4233 5018 OH 4LOAD ASPHALT DUMPING 0249-4232 SOSl OHOCT BILLING 0295-4392 002017 OH r'iSTREET SIGNS 0249-4232 137193 OH i REIMBURSEMENT-BNGLIS 0129-4221 002013 OH REIMBURSE-COURT APPB 0129-43S1 002017•OH 1 -1 MANHOLE EXTENSIONS 0249-4233 10557 ^ OH ■i. ! MANHOLE CASTINGS 0249-4233 010516 OH MANHOLE SPACERS 0249-4233 010496 OH MANHOLE RINGS. GLUE 0249-4233 10584 OHMANHOLE RINGS 0249-4233 10547 OHMANHOLE RINGS 0569-4234 010529 OH PACKAGE TO POPHAIM H 0299-4303 08-139216 OH EXPRESS MAIL 0020-4399 08-140521 OH 1 FLOOR MATS-POLICE 0129-4343 308532 OH STREET DEPT EMP1.0YBB 0249-4221 306276 OHSTREET DEPT EMPLOYEE 0249-4221 302573 OH * 5 •'.*» . ’ • W #' s ■■■ ' a I H. rr /A ^v^ 'VL -;- COUNCIL CHECK REOISTER W«*il Nov 9 1994 00:08:37 Page 3CHECK NO CHECK DATE CIIKCK AMOUNT VKKOOR DE.SCRI I'TION ACCOUNT H INVOICE PO NUM,MANUAL0318321994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 $l«i.49$2.60$2.60$15.49$46.23$15.10$67.47$2.56$429.44*G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K .SERVICES G fc K .-.ERVICES RATHliUN, gUASTstkffi:nuac;kn STKFFFNUAcniN RATJIBWN, gUAST STREET DEPT EMPLOYEE RATHBUN. QUAST FLOOR MATS STEFFENHAr.KN 0S49-4221 0590 1221 0590-1221 0569 4221 0219 4221 0569 1221 0099 4343 0590-1221 302574 302572 306275 306277 299841 298842 ■ 298840 2988.19 OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH0318331994/11/141994/11/14 $50.00$50.00$100.00*GANGKI.MOI-K. DONNA GANGELHOFF. DONNA DEER PICKUP-FOX ST k DEER PKTUP-WTRTOWN 01B5-4 360 0105 4360 00201900203S OHon0318341994/*: 'M $276.13$276.13*GENUINE FARTS CO HISC SUPPLIES 0219 4232 002031 OH03183S•1994/11/14 S241.S9$241,59*GOLF CAR MIDWEST•REPAIR GOLF CART 0590-4331 942564•OH0318361994/11/141994/11/14 $103.95$69.30$173.25*GOPHER STATE ONBCALL GOPHER STATE ONBCALL OCT SERVICE OCT SERVICE 0549-43060569-4306 41005244100524 OHOH0318371994/11/14 $1,923.80$1,923.80*GROUNDS CREW OCT SERVICE 0290-4343 1210 OH0318381994/11/14 $683.79$683.79*lIBNN COUNTY TREAS POSTAGE REIMBURSBMEN 0040 4321 002042 OH0318391994/11/14 $1,782.00$1,782.00*HENN CTY FIN DIV ROOM k BOARD-SEPT 00S0-43SB 2686 OHi^. 031840 1994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 $142.94$44.21$142.94 $330.09* HBNN CTY SHERIPP DPT HBNN Cl'Y SHERI PP DPT HBNN CTY SIIERIPP DPT BOOKING FEES - SEP SPECIAL RBPAIR-OCT BOOKING PEES-SEP OOBO-'43580129-43400080-4358 002006002036002035 OHOHOH 031841 1994/11/14 $176.69 $176.69* HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED GRASS SEED 0290-4231 002037 OH 031842 1994/11/14 $100.00 $100.00* ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-DBF COMP W/H 9999-2030 002007 OH 031843 1994/11/14 $85.00 $85.00* INTL CONF-BLDG OPPLS MEMBERSHIP-OMAN 0174-4380 M42064 OH 031844 1994/11/14 $86.19 $86.19* JIM HATCH SALES CO RAKE 6 BRACKET 0249-4232 3982 OH ^•r F- rn *.-m- "I d / COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Wod Nov 9 1991 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 00:on:J7 VIvNOOR i)i:s<kH'TioN1994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 $4&.19 $1B .42 $f. .27 ?■ V > 031845 $70.28*031846 1994/11/14 $114.85$114.85*031847 1994/11/14 $2,500.00$2,500.00*031848 1994/11/14 $40.82$40.82*031849 1994/11/14 1994.'11/14 $23.24$13.59$36.83*031850 1994/11/14 $30.00$30.00* 031851 1994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 $478,17$199.58$1,459.58$465.75$1,143.50$2,212.56$2,016.53 $478.17 $1,164.04 $9,617.88* 031852 1994/11/14 $20,717.00 $20,717.00* 031853 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 $68.53 $3.96 $3.96 $19.85 $38.12 $13.80 $13.80 $13.80 -$61.40 $114.42* 031854 1994/11/14 $54.42 $54.42* 1994/11/14 $4.50 KURIIN, THOMAS KUEHN, THOMAS KUEHN. IHOMAS Mil.HACK OCT Mil.CAGE 0<Tmii.i;a :i; o<tIJINO EGUll’ CO 1J1C1T i)HUKl.EY RISK REPAIR BOBCAT LOADERSTODOLA CLAIM 1011,25LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPM REPAIR CARB MOWERMABUSTH JEANNE MABUSTH-JEANNE MILEAGE UEIMB-MABUST .‘BIPPI.TEf: HE 1 MB MABUSMALEFl1991, 1994 RENEWAL-JMEDICANBDICAMEDICAMEDICAMEDICAMEDICAMEDICA MEDICA NBDICA CHOICECHOICEaiOICBCHOICECHOICEaiOICECHOICE CHOICE CHOICE NOVMOVNOVNOVNOVNOVNOV NOV NOV INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE METRO WASTE CONTROL CO SEWER SERVICE-DEC MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD PROD MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MILLER, CHRIS MILEAGE REIMBURSBMEN MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM OXYGEN X ♦ . • ► 7 l-'f ACCOUNT II006*1 4 301 or»b‘* liBl UTM 4 30 10244 2 32 OOHO 43030290 43420174 4301 OI T4 - 4 2 I 0IU29-430O0174OS4990010b69003999990129 0069 0249 41S1415112984151415120304151 4151 4151 9001-2226 0039 0069 0129 0174 0039 0129 0069 0174 0039 4210 4210 4210 4210 4210 4210 4210 4210 4210 0069 4381 0249-4220 INVOICK 1^0 NUM •••• 002029002029002029RS495H0020451550002009002009002011002001002001002001002001002001002001 002001 002001 002001 514S1294 921889 921889 921889 921889 931467 931467 931467 931467 931467 002039 R1I0940B58 Page 4 MANUALOilOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH OH OH OH OH ON OH OH OH OH OH OH ON OH OH COUNCIL ClIBCK REGISTER Ned Nov 9 1994 aiECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 00:08:37VENDOR Pa9e 5if■031055 1994/11/141994/11/14 $13.50 $80.49 $106.49*MINNEAPOI.IS OXYGEN MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN1994/11/14 $334.47 MINNEGASCOp..;J'..031054 1994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 $134.84 $11 .89 $481 .20*$5.00 MINNEGASCOMINNEGASCOMN DEPT OP REVENUE0310571994/11/14 $684.00$609.00*MN DEPT OF REVENUE.031058 1994/11/14 $360.00 $360.00*MN DEPT PUB SAFETY0310591994/11/14 $130.00$130.00*MN TURF CONFERENCE1:031040 1994/11/14 $225.00$225.00*MOORSB RON■€K t ' -1994/11/14 $251.47 NSPp1994/11/141994/11/14 $384.74 $9.42 NSPNSP1994/11/14 $1,156.22 NSP•i-. r 1994/11/14 $09.14 NSPK: ■ ir -..1994/11/14 $2,574.77 NSP 031041 1994/11/14 $36.06$4,701.02*NSP 031042 1994/11/14 $1,097.35 $1,097.35* NSP 1994/11/14 j 120.56 OLSON, JOHN C.:tr't. ^ : V 031043 031044 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 i < i 123.95 ^44.51* 195.76 ^95.76* OLSON, JOHN C. OMAN/LYLB 031045 1994/11/14 $249.95 $249.95* OTTBN BROS aw I 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 f' ■ ■:.r ■■■ N. ' $4,400.94 $94.00 $24.00 3.SOI.11 0,229.05*I PBRA INS PBRA INS PBRA INS PBRA INS Cif’ ■ ■ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT il INVOICE PO NUM.MANUALOXYGEN0129-4331 RI10940859 OHOXYC.EN 0249-4220 425716 OilHEATING - I’W 0099-4324 002004 oilHEATING-CITY HALL 0099-4324 002004 OHHEATING WTR PLANT 0549-4324 002004 OH.SALES TAX-OCT 9001-3500 002026 OHSALES TAX-OCT 9674-2222 002026 OilNOV SERVICE 0129-4340 94Q3218 OHCONFERENCE-STEFFENHA 0590-4356 002027 OHREIMBURSE-ICMA CONFE 0039-4356 002049 OHNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPNSPCOSTSCOSTSCOSTSCOSTSCOSTSCOSTSCOSTS STREET LIGHTING-OCT REIMBURSE SUPPLIES-O REIMBURSE SUPPLIBS-0 MILEAGE REIMBURSBMEN GROUND WORK-BROWN RD PERA 10/10 - 10/23/9 DEC INS DEC INS H/ll PBRA W/H 10/10 - 10/ 0249054901750099059005490290 4324432443244324432443244324 0249-4325 0049-4301 0049-4210 0174-4301 0340-4231 9999-2031 0129-4152 9999-2030 9999-2030 002043002043002043002043002043002043002043 002015 002000 002000 002040 8441 002005 002023 002023 002005 OilOHOHOHOHOilOH OH OH i OH ^ OH OH OH OH COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Hod Nov 9 1991 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CTHCCK AMOUNT0)18<7031068031869 1994/n/M1994/11/M1994/11/M1994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 $58.52 $10.78 $54.12 $36.40 $92.40 $252.22*$64 .96 $64.96*$191.45$19.53$9.15$58.00$278.13*$7.31$8.76$2.82$18.89*$600.07$600.07*138.00i681.64i819.64* $21.75 $21.75* U:065.00 065.00* 760.00 760.00* $30.00 $30.00* $206.96 $206.96* $327.97 $312.97 $640.94* $21.45 $21.45* 0»;H8:37 VENDOR Dir.orui’TioN ACCOUNT If INVOICEPIONEERPIONEERPIONEERPIONEERPIONEERnAMPI.K HAM.OT TESTIN’ VOTING SYSTE AD-EAl.l. RATES ELECriON NOTICE ORUIAN< E PUNLISHPRKCI.SluN ULAS 6 MIRRO ADJUST DooR CT.OSURE-PRO TIRE h EXHAUST PRO TIRE 6 EXHAUST PRO TIRE fc EXHAUST PRO TIRE 6 EXHAUST ALIGNMENT IM2B OIL <'HANGE H168 FILM PRO('ESSING BRAKE CHECK 6 SERVICRITZ CAMERA RIT2 CAMERA RITZ CAMERA F1IJ< PROCES.S1NG FUJI PROCESSING FlUl PROCESSINGRYAN FORD REPAIR TRANSMISSION,SAFE BENEFITS SAFE BENEFITS ADMIN FEE NOV EMPLOYE H/H - NOVSaiARBER 6 SONS INC REPAIR GEARBOX SENIOR COMMUNITY SBRVI SR CITIZEN SERVICES- SHIELY COMPXNY 100 TONS 3/4 MINUS STA-SAFB LOCKSMITHS REPAIR DOOR LOCK STANDARD PLUMBING 6 AP REFUND PLBG PERMIT STANDARD SPRING CO STANDARD SPRING CO REPLACE SPRINGS 8428 REPLACE SPRINGS 8428 STAR TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 0010-1123 001U 4323 0S90-1323 0040-4323 0174-4323 r>3f74 3 &13 S.3r*0129 4343 50460249-4341 0129-4341 0129-4210 0129 4341 39303966176676340000129-42100129-42100129-4210 376634037672043767440129-4111 667000299-43069999-2030 1258512505 0590-4342 0100-4305 0249-4233 0129-4343 9001-3131 7193 002046 62000 2695 002024 0249-4342 0249-4342 40600 406B7 0039-4240 002010 PO NUM.Page 6 MANUALOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOilOHOHOHOHOHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 4 j - . « • -_ _a. COUNCIL CHECK RECISTER Wo«l Nov 9 1994 00:08:37 r«ge 7‘.fv'T '; \ 7 tr-*K'u ;• ;■» t. « aiBCK NO aiF.CK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 8 INVOICE PO NUN. MANUAL0316801994/11/14 $30.78$30.78*STHEH'IIEIO:HOLSTER. MAG HOLDER 0129 4221 97944.1 OHOil0316811994/11/14 $8SG.SS $856.55*SIII.I.IVAN. ."^TEl’HKN rkimdor;;e iacp confe 0129 4356 0020180310821994/11/141991/11/14 $16.69 $17.47 $34.16*TOMCIIECK. l.ARRY TOMCHECK, LARRY CONF SUPPLIES TOMCHE REIMHUKSF. TOMCHECK 0129 4356 0129-4241 002002002002 OHOH0318831994/11/141994/11/14 $433.72$530.11$963.83*TOWN 6 COUNTRY TOWN 6 COUNTRY NOV SERVICE NOV SERVICE 0129-43490099-4349 002025002025 OHOH0318841994/11/14 $352.25$352.25*U S WEST CELLULAR CELL PHONB-CHESWICK 0129-4320 002020 OH0310851994/11/14 $57.41$57.41*•UNIFORMS UNLIMITED FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES•0129-4232 002003 OH• 031886 1994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/141994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 $88.19$44.10$88.19$08.19$13.23$30.07$259.49$55.48 $55.48 $257.76 $88.19 $1,069.17* US WEST COMMON US WEST COMMON US NEST COMMON US NEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US NEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US NEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US NEST COMMUN US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US WEST COSTS US NEST COSTS 0059-43200069-43200174- 4320 0249-4320 0549-4320 0569-4320 0129-43200175- 4320 0549-4320 0590-4320 0039-4320 002044002044002044002044002044002044002044002044002044 002014 002014 OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH OH OH 031187 1994/11/14 $11,243.38 $11,243.38* WALDOR RUMP UPGRADE L.S. 815 • 0569-4344 31253 OH 031080 1994/11/14 1994/11/14 $2,302.96 i;2,704.50 $4,907.46* WAYZATA-CITY OF WAYZATA-CITY OP 3RD QTR WATER PURCllA FIRE PROTECTION-4TH 9672-1299 0133-4318 002030 002012 OH OH 031889 1994/11/14 $117.23 $117.23* WBSTSIDE WHOLBSALB TIR NEW TIRES 8709 0249-4341 69544 OH 031090 1994/11/14 $114.26 $114.26* WRIGHT COUNTY JOURNAL AD-PALL RATES 0590-4323 002028 OH 031891 1994/11/14 $0.00 $8.00* WRIGHT IIENN ELECTRIC SECURITY LIGHT-OCT 0249-4324 002022 OH $149,626.70 r'^- »*-—— •« : ■* r-ii* .t?.' COUNCIL CHECK RBGISTBK Wr.«l Nuv 9 1994 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CMH-CK AMOUNT 00:OB :37 VENDORCOimCIL CHECK SUMMARY Wed Nov 9 1994 00:08:4SPOND •001 GENERAL FUND $62,800.80FUND •423 MUM ST AID CO/FD $53,708.87FUND 1 672 NTH OPERATING FD $3.081.35POND •673 SNR OPERATING PD $17,221.16FUND •674 G/C OPERATING PD $1,687.27FUND 1 999 PAYROLL CLEARING $11,127.25'4 ^ iM- rb; ‘■I'- »• ‘ $149.626.70 DEiU'R I PTION ACCOUNT K INVOICE Page •PO NUM. MANUALPage 1 •i- ■} N •fi-f •fS ■■ .-j.’ ■■?. U/0</»4 PR: Ci PRVOtDOR jm wCITY O4 -fSii HAHOMRITTEN/VOID/ADJUSTM^ REGISTER PAOIIDi 137RCMP •4<fMll07 NAMEPAUC TYPBDBPT , GREGORY H 42 Y-T-DTOTALGROSS CURRENTTOTALGROSS CURRENT FEDERAL INC TAX CURRENT STATE INC TAX CPERA FICA MEDICARE CRUNION NET-m. . - - &»|4'vS-, »■ ■' mm-.»• K'SiWto''-.'- ^ mmi/x 27.472.2327.472.23 1.113.041.113.04 115.74115.74 45.9445.94 47.0847.08 79.7779.77 0.000 231.89231.89 592.40592.40 , W ■-mA' f . .' -JT: 10/23/9-1 PR -ra PRp.EcicR 229 EMP » NAME DPT YTD GROSS 57:<8«060 574SS3339 •} 78 921819 •171940871 47S-143862 489643008 •172503991 4C9S26026 47S989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 469686562 468420832 476020397 469087884 474667812 47S3801S1 4775C0666 475444249 477463877 471569863 477647279 471848180 472500574 121262417 4753-44512 480843542 470987727 477700023 334506281 473108428 46890SS35 476783251 476866274 470700901 469848107 474167795 4753. 2983 473746173 473609629 470566529 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 •170704904 475505292 468629488 477881539 ANDERSON, aSUCS L 30B2IEN, SUE A BORIS, SCOTT W BOSMA, JAMIE L SRINKKAUS. JOHN F CARLSCM, MICHAEL 3 CHBS'rflCK, GARY 3 CORNrex, JAMES L DEMBOUSKI. JAY C ENGLISH III, IRVING ERICKSON. KURT R FISCHBNICH. DAN T GAFFRON, MICHAEL ? GERHARDSON, JOHN R GOMAN. ANITA D. COMAN. DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSINC. CAROL J HASEMAN. CAROLS JOHNSON. BRADLEY P KARNIT2. RICKY D KNOLLEN8ERG. KRISTIN KUEKN. THOMAS M MABUSTH. JEANNE A MCINTYRE. WILLIAM E MCNICHOLS, DAVID L MILLER. CHRISTOPHER MCORSE. RONALD J MOROWeZYNSKI, JAMES OAS. DANIEL 0 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G OBRIEN. RANDY L OLSON. JOHN C. OMAN, LYLE B PALMER, GREGORY A PETERSON. JACK H QUAST. WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J ROSS, JOHN A SCHOBNHOFP, JOHN B SKREBN, DALE S 31 31 31 12 42 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 33 42 35 35 SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X *HOMTON, MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMC2YK. MARK W VANG. BRUCE L VBE. LINDA S WECXMAN. STEPHEN J 41566.49 23199.55 3404.73 11984.31 36387.73 5719.35 39042 44020 40070 39902 35923 36075.22 33265.85 59542.13 1283.12 6884.04 09 15 03 07 97 42 29143.90 12 28656.68 42 26898.86 31 13245.54 12 23774.23 31 38892.66 31 3875.03 31 4691.02 15 48938.83 33 41659.57 93 3291.15 31 36474.25 15 13171.11 12 54277.75 31 36500.93 93 3145.144227097,06 92 27178.92 15 9570.36 33 33067.40 42 26559.19 93 3043.00 92 33516.749226919.64 93 4022.84 31 10687.79 42 26679.71 93 23656.63 31 46589.69 31 35258.45 31 36519.89 31 35761.39 33 28656.68 12 25462.67 33 26511 . 17 CURRENT GROSS 16 56 99 38 . 96 .52 .37 92 .32 .85 .52 10 17 04 92 55 60 36 1703 1042 1241 591 1656.00 262.03 1774.56 2115.06 1691.87 1699 1611 1609 1513 2180 68 115 1381 1304 1113 564 104 2 1762 87 410.41 2227.21 1995.93 163.35 1873.19 1088.24 2449.44 1611.52 209.07 1113.04 1280.01 938.32 1513.92 1280.00 335.00 1496.07 1363.49 67.80 371.28 1363.48 1304.16 2177.28 1581.37 1640.66 1611.52 1304.16 1120.75 1209.20 63,134.73 4 U/06/91 PR: CB PRREGCR -J1 # EMP « NAME 471688060 474563339 476921819 471840871 475443662 468843008 472503991 469526026 475989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 469686562 468420832 476020397 469087884 474667812 47S3801S1 477500666 475444249 477463877 471569863 471848180 472500574 121262417 475344512 480843542 470987727 477700023 334506281 473108428 468909535 476783251 476866274 470700901 469848107 474167795 475382983 473746173 473609629 470566529 469629194. ANDERSON, BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS. SCOTT W BOSMA, JAMIE L BRINKHAUS. JOHN F CARLSON, MICHAEL B CHESWICR. GARY B CORNICE, JAMES L DEMBOUSKI, JAY C ENGLISH III, IRVING ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHCNICH. DAN T GAFFRON. MICHAEL P 3ERHARDS0N, JOHN R GOMAN, ANITA D. GOMAN, DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN, CAROLE JOHNSON, BRADLEY P KUEKN, THOMAS M MABUSTH. JEANNE A MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E MCNICHOLS, DAVID L MILLER, CHRISTOPHER MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES OAS, DANIEL 0 08ERAIGNER, SCOTT G OBRIEN, RANDY L OLSON, JOHN C. OMAN. LYLE E PALMER, GREGORY A PETERSON, JACK W QUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J ROSS. JOHN A SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B SKREEN, DALE S 475569177 STEFFENHAGEN, RONAL 267460042 SULLIVAN, STEPHEN X 472563051 THOMTON, MARK R 474663296 TOMCHBCK, LAWRENCE 470704904 TOMCZYK. MARK W 475505292 VANG. BRUCE L 468629488 VEE, LINDA S 477881539 WECKMAN. STEPHEN J YTO CURRENT DPT GROSS GROSS 31 43331.21 1764.72 31 24242.11 1042.56 31 9711.28 1306.55 12 12576.19 591.88 . 42 38043.73 1656.00 31 6156.15 436.80 - 31 40816.66 1774.57 • 31 46172.27 2152.12 31 41635.84 1565.81 31 41803.66 1901.59 31 37535.49 1611.52 31 37626.42 1551.20 33 34779.77 15x3.92 42 61722.44 2180.31 35 1458.38 175.26 35 7138.86 254.82 42 30797.60 1653.70 12 29960.84 1304.16 42 28011.90 1113.04 31 13816.01 570.47 12 24816.79 1042.56 31 40723.25 1830.59 31 5101.43 410.41 15 51166.03 2227.20 33 43555.49 1895.92 93 3384.38 93.23 31 38050.93 1576.68 15 14259.35 1088.24 12 56727.19 2449.44 31 38112.44 1611.51 93 3190.59 45.45 42 28377.07 1280.01 92 28291.96 1113.04 15 10509.18 938.32 33 34581.32 1513.92 42 27672.23 1113.04 93 3292.00 249.00 92 34920.66 1403.92 92 28032.68 1113.04 93 4065.22 42.38 31 11031.77 343.98 42 27792.75 1113.04 D 93 29960.84 1304.16 31 48766.97 2177.28 31 36839.81 1581.36 F 31 38101.25 1581.36 31 37372.91 1611.52 33 29960.85 1304.17 12 26739.80 1277.13 33 27720.37 1209.20 11/30/94 PR CM PRREGOR -iO 62.662.10 EMP #NAME DPT YTD GROSS 469186026 CALLAHAN, EDWARD J 11 3300.00 18324677 GOETTEN, J.DIANN 11 2658.37 470366069 KURR, JOELLEN L 11 2658.37 473646272 JAfiBOUR, GABRIEL 11 2658.37 476527186 KELLEY, CHARLES 11 2658.37 OIRRENT GROSS 300.00 241.67 241.57 241.57 241.57 1,265 .58 information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING CQUHOLMBniie NOV 1 4 19M CnYOFOMM OF IR » • • . { • ..r ,. • ■ cmr OF ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1994 7:15 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS ATTENDANCE AGENDA 1. Approval of Minutes October 4, 1994. 2. Signs for Beaches ■ Sununit Beach - Tabled in October. 3. Parks Ordinance - Tid>ted in October. 4. Long Lake Water Quality Project/Jet Ski Ordinance (Flint) - Tabled in September. 5.Bike Trail Progress Report. Brown Road Old Crystal Bay Road Bridge Dickey Property Development Winter Recreation Program - Orono Golf Course 7.French Creek Preserve Report on October 16th Construction Projects. 8. Possible Developmem of New Park in Saga Hill Area 9. Activity Report Community Education Program 10. Other Business. ADJOURNMENT r [ i ! L ORONO f \RK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 4.1994 DRAFT attendance The Park Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Richard Flint, Alex Vongries, Susan Wilson, Lili McMillan, Robert Howells, Sherokee Use, and James White. Council member Hurt was present. Public Works Director John Gerhardson and Recorder Sherry Frost represented Staff. Chair Flint called the meeting to order at 8:40 p.m. (#1) approval of minutes of SEPTEMBER 6,1994 Howells had two corrections. Page 4, paragraph 2, should read "canott are removed" rather than ’canoe racta are removed.’. On p^e 4. paragraph 3. under *6 aher Business, the laa sentent* should read.’TTm City ovrna the BEfieaa a«l w|'l P»y narking lot based 00 the five-year lease commitmem." White moved, McMillan second^ to^prove the minutes of the September 6,1994 Park Commission meeting as amended. Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#2) COUNCIL/PARK SURVEY RESULT DISCUSSION The Park Commission met with the City Council prior to the start of this meeting and discussed the park survey. m SIGNS FOR BEACHES (SUMMIT BEACH) Itan #3, Signs for Beaches, was tabled.. the Parks Commission meeting on November 7, 1994. (g4) PARKS ORDINANCE The Commissioners were provided with a copy of the City Ordina^^Sec 9 31, ^ Swimming Beach Regulations - Unlawful Acts Discussion was tabled to the Commission meeting on November 7.1994. (#5) ICE RINK MA1N1XNANCE operator thus eliminating snow fi-om being thrown back maintenance maintenance of the rinks is being stressed as well as the scheduling r MINin^S OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION DRAFT (#5 - Ice Rink Maintenance - Continued) system involving the use of massive flooding from a fire hydr^t versu^ooding m BUenwxJd. Howeils at Antoine. McMiUan will provide monitofing forms to the Others. <#6) CRYSTAL BAY PLAYGROUND - PLANNING Wilson moved. McMiOm. seconded, to formally request J27W from CDTO n»^ ^tlm taySrk playground plan at the Oaober 10.1994 Cty Couned Meeting, Ayes 7. Nays 0. In f------ it was decided the sub-committee, whose representatives are Vongries. wtr Mdiillan Oerttardson. and Randi Carlson, a neighbor. wtB meet to prepare tta ^^2^a!fo«wir;hc planner This wiU include the survey. i|qn.t su^eScLmissiooers view the Deephaven park, located acrom hh^onka Blvd. He stated that he thought its ambiance reflected what Orono s residents desired as indicated in the survey, member of the sub-conunittee. Howells mquired about the results of the perculatton t^. have* well needed to be instaUed to analyze where ~nt^«e» winch ^ moved to ascertain the stabuity of the situation A pipe wiU extend from gr aiK)ut a year but should not affect the park development p an. Wilson also stressed the need for the post office parking lot plan to proceed. I t 11 I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 4. 1994 DRAFT (#7) CROSS COUNTRY SKI PROGRAM - ORONO GOLF COURSE Jan Guenther was present to report on the continuing use of the golf course this winter for the cross-country ski program. The course, as wdl as the clubhouse, was used on Wednesday evenings last winter. Guenther said there is no night skiing at Baker Park, and French Park is very crowded. Guenther would like to continue to provide grooming of the course and is interested in expanding the program to include a weekend day for skiing, sledding, snowboarding, etc. The Commissioners discussed the public's reaction to using the course and the clubhouse and found there was a positive response. It was felt the public's winter tecreational needs could be better met by opening the course and clubhouse on both Saturday and Sunday afternoons. Gerhardson was asked how the Commission would go about getting approval for using the clubhouse. Gerhardson said a budget would need to be prepared. The Commission would need to determine if there would be a user-fee or if this would be provided as a public service. Flint determined the annual cost of using the clubhouse for skiing for two and one-half months would be approximately $640, which was felt not to be a big obstacle. Gerhardson will get together with the City Administrator to discuss a possible plan and payment thereof.. Vongries asked about the interest shown by the residents, the safety issue, and the concern with recoupii^ the cost of a bigger program. Guenther said money is collected for races. The possibility of selling hot chocolate, cider, coffee, candy, etc. was also discussed. White moved, WUson seconded, to ask the City Staff to investigate the feasibility of opening the golfcourse and ctubhouse during the winter season one even^ a week and on Saturday and Sunday afternoons. Ayes 6, Nays 0, with Vongries abstaining. («8) HOCKEY ARENA PROGRESS REPORT Mark ingebritson and Pat Wolf of the Orono Hockey Association presented the initial feasibibty study for a community ice arena to update the Comnussion and get their reaction to the study. The Association currently uses open ice time when available at the Mound pond arena and at the Delano arena for hockey players. They arc students in the Orono School District, who live within the district or arc from open enrollment. Qrls hock^ programs are taking hold and expanding around the state. Figure skating is booming with local skating clubs, senior, adult, and disabiUty leagues This has resulted in ashort^eoficetime. The association has developed two possible solutions. l)to ca the developmem of an Orono arena, or 2) e.\pansion of the Pond arena in Mound to two sheets of ice in conjunction with the City of Mound The Association would pretw to see a new arena buih in Orono One advantage M be alleviating the need to travd any distance. The purpose i/i this feasibUity study is to make clear what the nght deaston should be so a choice may be made by November. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 4. 1994 DRAFT (#8 - Hockey Arena Progress Report - Continued) The Orono Hockey Association hired Architects, Hamd & ??. and Contractor. Krause Anderson. The feasibifity work culminated m the report received by the Park Commission. A site is available through the school district. Site review, planning, and pricing have been done. The association has met with Staff on these issues. Pat Wolf has been |yadi«g the fund raising which is primarily through private donations to build the facility with the future operating costs to be borne by user fees. It is reported that at this point, no insurrooumable problems have arisen. The key will be raising the constniction costs; if these cannot be raised, the Association will not proceed. Commissioner Wilson asked if Orono presently has a girls varsity team and also inquired of the number of children that do skate. Ingebritson said it wiU be about four years until Orono has a girls varsity team. At present, the pec-wee team consists of 7th and 8th graders. There are 280 children enrolled in the youth program this year from four years old through junior high. Howells asked what was the difference between girls and boys hock^ and ringettes. Ingebritson said there is no checking involved in girls hockey but otherwise, it is the same In ringettes. a cheerio-type puck is used which does not come off the ice. He feels the interest in ringettes is subsiding with the increased interest in girls hockey. Use askrd about open ice time. Ingebritson said community education has an interest and would put funding asde with the expectation of using 175 hours of ice time at $100 per hour during the six month period of operation. The school district also would purchase its ice time. McMiMan who would own the ice rink if it was built. Ingebritson said the Association would be a non-profit, 501(cX3). organization, which would qualify for real estate and income tax exemption. The organization would then either operate the areiw themselves or hire someone to run the arena. McMillan also inquired about feed^k from the school district. Ingebritson said the schools arc veiy cooperative and see a need for an arena e^tecially with the start of ^rls hockey. Althou^ there have been to o *. the school district is happy to have the hockey association investigate the builduig of an arena. It is unknown it this time whether the school district would sell or lease the land to the association. 1 ___J Ik t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION meeting held on OCTOBER 4. 1994 DRAFT (#8 - Hockey Arena Progress Report - Continued) Flint about the economics of the arena. The study shows the cost of the arena at $2,500,000 with a yearly operating cost of SI45,000. The hockey association would be the biggest user of the rink. They, along with the school district, would pay for their ice time. The arena plan calls for one olympic-size sheet of ice, whose use would cany the operating costs of the building but would not contribute toward the cost of its constniction. Ingebritson said that generally, when an arena has a second sheet of ice, it will generate payment of the debt service on the construction debt. Ingebritson relayed the breakdown of user costs as requested by Flint. At SKXVhr ice cost, the rink should reflect a positive cash flow. The projections show 750 hours of use by the hockey association, 280 hours of use through the school’s two varsity teams. 360 hours of figure skating time, 100 hours of prime time skating, and other revenues such as skate sharpening. These are projected funds raised without going outside of Orono. but Wayata and Mound also have expressed their interest in obtaining future ice time. As m example, Ingebritson said that the association is projected to raise $65,000 this year in ice time. Howells asked if the arena will be a year-round facility. Ingebritson said the arena has the capability citing sport events, practices, meetings, etc as possible uses, but plan is for being in operation from October I to March I. The fixed costs shown in their report reflect all year but the revenue calculations are for the six-month ice time only. Hurr inquired about the Pond alternative. Ingebritson said the Mound School District is looking into the buildup's use if an expansion is done but is not as far along in its evaluation. Ingebritson would like to see a cooperative effort with the Park Commission and receive their expertise and input on these issues. A decision will be made by the hockey association next month as to which direction the arena issue should go. Once that decision is made, the plans will be presented to the City Counal. #9) FRENCH CREEK PRESERVE Wilson reported that she, along with several girt scout troops, will conduct a a clean-up as well as building a blind for observation, on Sunday, 10/16/94 at 1:00 p.in. She has met with Gerhardson on obtaining lumber and parts necessary, as well as a picnic t^e or i e prairie area for next spring. It was noted that the guidelines for budding the blind came from the book, "Landscaping for Wildlife." Flint suggested the Council be invited to tins event, and McMillan volunteered to take pictures. minutes of the regular orono park commission meeting held on OCTOBER 4. 1994 I i i draft (#9 - French Creek Preserve - Continued) Wilson also reported that Pete Meyer, who does and will continue the bluebird house monhoripg. has received the "Bluebird of the Year* award from the Minnesota Bluebird Recovery Program for his effort with bluebirds. He has agreed to buUd four mallard houses this winter to be installed on ports to keep predators away. The cost wUl be $100 covering both materials and installation. It was noted that bluebirds have been seen at one of the bluebird houses this year. Wttson also infbnned the Commissioners of the information sign which will be installed near the entrance. It will be a podium-s^le rign. made of wood and metal, which will inform the public of what has been seen in the area. $500 has been aUocated for this sign. It was noted that paridrtg for five to six cars was available next to Metro Waste Pumpiiig Station. Wilson tnoved, Dse seconded, to recommend the City Council appropriate the requested fimds from the park dedication fees. Ayes 7. Nays 0. (#10) OTHER BUSINESS Gerhardson presented the Commission with the a copy of the letter of appreciation, which will be sent to the 1994 park contributors, and the letter for recruitment to be sent to community education groups, churches, giri scouts, boy scouts, senior center, districts, and others who might show imerert in helping with the the^tific^ of the City's parks. Flint suggested attaching a list of parks to the letter. This would aid w ^ compiling a list to show where people are imererted in helping. The letters wiu be signed by the mayor and paric commission chair. ADJOURNMENT Use moved, Howells seconded, to adjourn the meeting. Ayes 7, Nays 0. The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m. Richard N Flint. Chair I i ' •? ' J . ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 17,1994 ROLL The Orono Pleimtng Coimnission met on the above date with the following members present: Chair Charles Schroeder, Stephen Peterson, Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist Candace Rowlette, Charles Nolan, Jr., and Janice Berg. The following represemed the City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistam f* -ning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gafiron, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor bw.vafd Callahan, Jr., was representative of the Council for this meeting. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) #1974 DON P. GAMBLE, IIL, 46S0 BAYSIDE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBIDIVISION - PUBUC HEARING - 7:00-7:25 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Afifidavit of Pubficatimi were noted. Donald Peterson represented the applicant. Mabusth reported this proposal is to divide Outlet C of the Painters Creek Planned Residential Subdivision, the remaining open space, Outlet D, from the former Ski Tonka property. The property is bounded by County Road 84 on the south and McCuUey Road on the west. The 13.38 acre property is to be divided into two lots in the five acre mbiinium lot zone. The lots ^ not meet the required lot width of lOff to the rear of the 30ff fitmt street setback. Lot 1 is defined as a comer lot and the code would define the front yard at CoRd 84, where there is limited lot width along the south lot line. Lot 2's front yard is also adjacent to C<dM 84 and has limited lot width to the south of the lot. There are sintable sites fi>r septic tremment on both lots. The proposed building she on Lot 2 does not conform to required rear yard setback. The structure must be moved W south to conform to the 100* setback. The proposed buildup she on Lot I meets all required setbacks. Access is the main issue. The proposed driveway has not yet been shown. There is a safety concern because of a hill at CoRd 84. Stsif recommends access at west side of lot 2. Mabusth noted that these lots are in the Westonka School District, as lots in the Painters Creek PRD to east are in the Orono Sdiool District. Mr. Peterson said the building pad was incorrectly shown. Mabusth asked Mr. Peterson about the bam on Lot 2 which is not readily seen. Mr. Peterson said he will get a demolition permh and remove the bam. The prospective buyer of Lot 2 confirmed his concern with the rear lot line and asked for clarification from the commission whether the north lot line is really a side yard. Staff will work with this proq>ective buyer to address any questions concerning placement of residenoe. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 (#1 - #1976 - Gamble • Continued) Peter Achey of4720 Bayaide vcMced his concern with being able to safely access the lots. Due to the lay of the land. Achey felt placing the two driveways together would create a hazard, while the peak of the ro^ on Bayside would provide what he felt would be a good safe enhy. Mabusth said the County prefers locating new curb cuts off County roads. However, in thn case, the County would approve access at Bayside Road rather than McCuUey. due to the high y of MoCulley. Mr. Peterson noted a problem with combtning the driveways due to the steep grade and said a safe access will be a priority. It was noted that a walkaway was shown for Lot 1 linkii^ it to the Luce Lir e. Lindquist moved. Peterson seconded, to ^)prove the two-lot subdivision application for Don Gamble at 4680 Bayside Road to include the 8 Staff recommendations Kst^ along with the addHiowi requirements that walkway area connectmg Lot 1 to Luce Line be constructed at existhig grades with wood chips placed on surface, and curb cuts sul^ect to approvalby Hennepin County and the City of Orono. Ayes 7. Nays 0. (#2) THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA («3) #1195 PAT WOLFE, 2971 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:25-7:50 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Wolfe was present. Gaffron reported this ap|4ication is for an after-the-fact variance for a shed located in the 0-75* zone. The shed is l(fxl2’. requiring a building permit, is located 8* from the shoreline, and constitutes 120 s.f of hardcover within the lakeshore protected area. It is also 3.5* from the side lot line next to the public access and beach. The shed was tenatty reconstructed, except for foundation slab, and would require the approval of the City. The DNR recommended denial of the variance and advised City to enforce its regulations. Gaffron said there is a problem with the exact location of the side lot line. A Torrens action probably would be required to detomine where the lot line is located. This could result in the loss of public beach area. The n«ghbors have sent supportive letters noting the shed has improved in appearance. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 (U3 - #1895 > Wolfe * Continued) Mr. Wolfe commented that the City naked to instidl a drainage ditch six years ago which is 60>7QT from the shoreline. It buffers the died thoi^ can be luuardous to children. Wolfe said the #1 problem is security. He feds the easement CTeates problems with trespassing and theft, and the shed eases this problem. The shed houses the pump for his irrigation system and electricity for the system. Mr. Wolfe reported knowing he needed a building permit. He was of the opinion that the builder hid acquired the permit and had placed a public notice sign on his lot. Wolfelater ftxmd out that no such permit was obtained, and the sign was probably stolen elsewhere Schroeder noted that the applicant should not have to incur malicious security proMems suggesting a fence be erected in the area to hdp alleviate these problems. Schroeder reported that a neighbor had received a variance for such a fence. Nolan commented that security does not warrant a hardship n that security ftom sp intrusions noted 1^ Applicant is not solved a shed. Nolan noted there are other areas where the shed could be located. Council members also said a lock bmc, which is about 4*xS'and 4'high, would serve the needs for the electrical and pump equipment. Peterson moved, Berg seconded, to deny Application #1895 for an after-the-fect variance for construction of a shed for Pat Wolfe at 2871 Casco Point Road. Ayes 7, Nays 0. f#4) #1989 JAMES W. OGLAND, 3345 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD • AFTER-THE- FACT VARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:50-7:57 P.M. Mr. Ogland was presem. Gaftron stated this application was tabled from the last meetiiig to devise a revision for the location of the shed. The shed is located on Dakota Rail right-of-way and built without a permit. Ogland has i^reed to move the shed bririging it to the zero setback. Iff from the house which will preserve a large tree. Hardcover percentages have been calculated. A lot coverage variance is technically needed but is less than the 1500 s.f allowed. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 (#4 . #1959 - Ogland • Continued) r Rowlette questioned why no penalty was applied when the matter was an after-the-fact variance. Ogland said he had been told by the City that 120 s.f. shed did not require a permit and no one rnemioned a variance to him. One year later, an inspector questioned him about the shed. Mabusth said the City now requires permits for sheds 120 s.f or less to ensure setbacks are met. Peterson moved, Nolan seconded, to approve the rear yard setback variance, the side yard setback variance, and the lot coverage variance necessary to approve the shed m the above noted location. Ayes 7, Nays 0. («5) #19M TOR JOHNSON/NAVARRE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH WITNESSES* 3455 TOGO ROAD - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC hearing - 7:57-5:20 P.M. Tor Johnson and Representative. Jeff Metzger, were presem. Gafton reported this application is a request for hardcover variance and conditional use permit which was t4Med at the previous meeting pending review of the drainage issue by the City Engineer and Public Works Department. The addition^ driveway will increase the hardcover to 43% requiring a variance, where 35% now em^ in the 5^1000 zone. The CUP is fi>r two additions which were built without the required comfitional use permit. The carport has been constructed at a 4T ride setback where 5(7 is requn^. The coat room meets all requirements. A $50 fee is to be added to the formal application. The area where the dairch is located has a drainage problem. The house to the e^ has a culvert with tile but it is fiuling and inadequate causing the home to flood during times of running water. The City Engineer has suggested bringing a swale or pipe akmg the east lot line of the churdt property which wiU cany the runoff into the catch basin n^ to Togo Road and evenually drain to the north. The applicant has agreed to imtalling either a 12" culvert or a swale. Planning Conunission members voiced concern with the (dan divertii^ the water problems to another area. Representative Metzger commented that the neighbor of the church to the east is agreedble to this plan. The church will instaU a pipe the entire distance from the front to the back of the property. This will channel the water around the neighbor Metzger has a plan detailii^ the elevation which shows the topography to be level along the east ride of property. Gafiron said the plan is consistent with the stormwater issue. It was reported that^the City Engineer has approved the plan, and the City wiB ask for a 15' drainage easement from the iqifdicant II I ■ ► r % MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17, 1994 (#5 - #1960 - Johnson/Nivarrc Congregation of lefaovah Witnesses - Continued) SthfftfdfT moved. Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #1960 for variance and conditkMial use peniiit per conditions set forth in Staff memo to include a IS* drainage easemeitt over proposed drainagewty subject to approval of the drainage plan by the City Engineer, stripmg of the parking lot. and a $50 fine for the after-the-fiKt permit. Ayes 7. NaysO. (#6) #1965 GUSTAFSON DESIGN/JAMES LEAR, 2525 DUNWOODY AVENUE - CONUniONAL USE PERMITA^ARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - t:25-t:40 P.M. Mr. Lear and Mr. Gustafson were both present. Gaffion reposted tins application was tabled from the last meeting awaiting a detailed plan wbidi is now included in this package. The bank on the property has tMmA and the plan consiau of a series of retainiiig walls of ageo-grid nature two fffryyy ^imI « vitXIcway to solve the erosioo problem. The esdsting stairway will be removed. The 43 s.f shed, which is 6* high, will remain for equipment storageand housing oftheinigBtioo system pump. The City Engineer is in agreernem with the plan but had noted the difficulty in mowing the slope area. The applicant decided not to mow the slopes, instetd proiectii^ the areas with erorion mats and mulch. Gaffirm sw d the did not want boulder-type rock which resulted in a plan consisting of a "lannon" stone product with Obric laid underneath. Staff commented that this plan should solve the sIm issue and erosion problems. Rowlette remarked, that should the shed deteriorate, a 20 s.f. structure would be expected in the future. It was noted that the layer offibrk to be used in the plan was not hardcover, and the rip-rap will need to be approved by the watershed rfistnet. Nolan moved, Berg seconded, to approve Applicatioo #1965 with the Staff reconanendation that a representative of American Engineering Testing be on site to rve the conditions during construction. Ayes 7. NaysO. (#7) #1967 K-* PROFERTIES/ROBERT OLSON, 4645 BAYSIDE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - REFERRAL FROM COUNCIL - S:40-9:06 P.M. Mr. Peterson and Mr. Olson were present L. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17.1994 (#7 - #1967 - K-P Propcitica/Olson - Continued) Gafiron repotted the initial request was to subdivide the Olson residence from a 17.5 pared kavuq) the rear property as an outlot for future developmem and an outlot with an access for future devdopment. The plan was modified to facilitate the sale of the Olson residence. It includes a 2.3 acre lot, an outlot for a road, an outlet to be later transferred to property, and an outlot for future development. This would not include the Geffie property but would include an easement to connect a back road to Bayside. The question still arose whether the Olson property would be able to connect to an imerior road. Another opfion was for an easement for a west access should the White property be acquired. It was determined that the White property would not be acquired .ind a 4-lot division will occur of tins property. At the last Council meeting, the plan was revised to not include the Geffre property, tlnis, creating an outlot with an easemoit. GafBon noted a letter from City Attorney Barrett regarding concern over enforcement of the successors or hm of the Geffie property to be bound to the terms of the easonent agreement previously laid out. The Gefire property is now part of the plan through an agreemoit so tins matter may f» kmger be of issue. The plan is now the same as that requested 1^ the City Staff, leaving options available and contitds within the resolution what will happen under cUflcrent scenarios of development. The park foes will be deferred on the outlot untO it is developed. Gaffron said both access possibililies have been approved by the County and are workable. Theresidence * have a fiulii^ septic, and Gaffion noted it will be replaced at a new location. fiwr tiift iMue hfmtight up by Barrett in his letter. Gaffion comnwnled that any approvri should stipulate the need fix the City Attom^s approval as well. Mr. Peterson reported having a new signed agreement with Geffie bindii^ successors and assignment shoidd that occur, and adeferred agreement to make a transfer if Outlot B is used. Peterson also said the issue of the variances requested at the last Planrang ConmusMon meeting has been resolved. The plans now caU for 2004'’ frontage on Bayside Road and 50+’ from the deck. Peterson reiterated why the plan is in two phases in order to facilitate the sale of the Olson property. He noted the cornmem given 1^ the City Council at their meeting for the desire of the input of the Planning Commisxoo. Mayor Callalian inteijected to the Commission members that if they as well as the City Attorney were agreeable to the terms of the proposal, the City CouncU would be wUlii« to look at this issue at their next meeting. Mr. Olson commented on the importance of timeliness in this matter. r i I: - I iTi MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17.1994 (#7 - #1967 - K-P Propeitic$/OI$on - Continued) Rowlelte commented on the shed located on Outlot C questioning whether it can or carniot remain without a principal structure, notify the need to place a tune limit on the decision with removal after one year. Nolan moved. Smith seconded, to approve Applicatkm #1967 for a subdivision as proposed to include Staff recommendatioos 1-10. reviewal of amendment document for Outlot D by City Attorney, and the removal of the shed on Outlot C after one year if a buildiflg pernnt IS not issue for construction of principal residence. Ayes7.Nays0. (#t) #lf#9 CITY OF ORONO, 1S55 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCE 11:45-ll:SiP.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Gafiron reported the parking lot is for the old post office and wUl have five parking stalls and one hanfficap stall. It will loop around the building- A variance for the Sff front setback IS needed. Lindquist moved. Peterson seconded, to approve Application #1969 for a variance for the City of Orono. Ayes 7. N^ 0. (#9) #1970 SCOTT MICHAEL WOLD, 3026 CASCO POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBUC HEARING - 9:00-9:15 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Wold was present. Mabusth noted the receipt of a letter from a neighbor, Andrew Rormingan. It wu written after reading the City En9necr*s comments but prior to seeing the Staff recommendations. Mabusth reported this appficatlon is for a CUP for lot 2 of Kelly Second Addition for approval of a walkout design involving 4S0 cubic yards of soil correction under the buildii^ pad. This plan would raise the structure 8-9^ resulting in a major devatton The apphcatioo also involves land alterations within property to immediate west. MINUTES OF THE ORONO l*LANNfNG COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 (W - #1970 - Wold - Continued) Mabusth said the City Engineer reports the need to protect the walkout single st^ garage on the property to west from flooding. The applicant was given an option to design underground tile. This method would require hydrauli. information to ensure adequate sizing of pipe so that flooding would be held one foot below the 100-year storm level. The appKcant. his engimser and the City Engineer agree tnere is adequate fall to ^port having an above-ground swale, rather than a below-ground pipe. The City would require a drainage easement from the applicant. Mr. Ronningan's letter voiced concern with the possible ^teration to the topography wtttdi he was not in favor of, citing the excavation fill, raiinng of the property, and standing water. Mabusth said the building pad does not have to be moved tovi^ the road, and also noted that the swale will lud the dnunage problem on the west side and cause no erosioo problems once ground cover has bw restored. The appticant noted that the plan will redirect water around to the front and side. Sc iroeder coinmentcd that if there is no effect on Ronningan, his basic concerns w«^ be with the fill beii^ stored on the she until h was pul back in place and fulfiUment of the erosion control rules Nolan's concern was with making sure that the drainage area was not being blocked during this construction period. Lindquist moved. Berg seconded, to approve Aplication #I9“'0 wth Staff recommendations on 1,2, and 3, with a drainage easement be designated durmg construction prior to bringing in material. Ayes 7, Nays 0 (#10) #1971 BRIAN fOPFCRASREG SARCEANT, 320 TURNHAM ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:15-9:30 P.M. Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Applicams, Brian Kipfer and Greg Sargeam, were presem Mriiusdi repotted it w«$ not the imem of the apphomts to creete a gueatho^ wwhw the IhraK apace of deUKhed garage, but, beeaure thn area could (unction as an mdependenl residental unit. Staff hsis asked that a CUP be filed This property is 2.8 acres in size and has a septic sized for a four bedroom residence, which will adequately handle t^ bathroom in the garage living space This living space consists of a loft covered porch, a full bathroom, and a lower Ir/ei work area wnh sinks. The Stairs concern is whether it is enough to deny the CUP in order that this space can never be used as a sqiarate dwelling as 2.8 area could never meet reqinrenicnts of 9 »n f-t: MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17.1994 (#10 - #1971 - Kipftr/Saiigeafit - Continued) The applicantt asked if a variance could be added to the title to ensure that they, along with future owners, could not use the space as a guesthouse. Mayor Callahan commented that Staff could add deed restrictions. Home^MCup matter. pemuts were discussed. It was decided that this was not an issue in this Rowlette moved, Lindquist seconded, to deny Applicatioo #1971 for a conditional>use peiimt for a guesthouse and instructed Staff to fdace said deed restriction on the property. Ayes 7, 0. (#11) #1972 DANIEL J. RADFORD, 35«3 CRYSTAL PLACE - VARIANCE PUBUC HEARING • 9:30-9:53 TM. The Certificate of Mailii^ and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Radfitcd was pn Mabusth reported that the appi .cation is for a street setback variance required for the pn^KMed I2*xl6.4* three-season porch. The roof line on the north side of the residence would be expanded but setbacks are met at that northwest comer. The applicant was questioned whether h would be possible to locate the porch where H would be conformutg. Radford refdied this would cut off the amount of light entering the living room area and possibly cause problems whh water druiinge because of the roof line of both rear additioos. The setback of the house in relation to the neighbor# homes was also discussed and found to be fairly consistent with one another. Mabusth noted there is no off-street parking or driveway on the property. The ap|4icant did not wish to amend the ^>plication to include a garage. He was informed that this approval would affect the City approval of any fiiture garage due to the lot coverage issue. Nolan moved, Rowlette seconded, to approve Applicatioo #1972 subject to a landscaping plan prior to receiving a building permit, a time frame on exterior improvementi completion within a one-year time period, cleaning up of the backyard area prior to receivirtg a binlding penint. and removal of the metal shed. Ayes 7. Nays 0. (#12) #1973 THOMAS CASHMAN, 1509 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:55-10:13 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Cashman wks present. minutes of 1 rlE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 I*Mabustb rqxMted this application is for a hi to rcpiaoe an cnistinB gai^t now located in the road nght-of-way and to construct a oecK in the 0-75' zone. The DNR has reviewed the request. The AB proBIe shows a bluff at the 970 elevation and at the 976 elevation at the CD profile. A bluff setback variance is ^ired as ^ garage will ertend 15' within the required 3ff setback and the deck Iff into the bh^ Ceil Strauss cC the DNR has reviewed the analysis infijcmalion and confirmed the location of the bhift on the property Strauss would not have a proWem with the garage setback but would not like to see a deck buik within the bhiffor setback areas, recommending the deck be placed at the southeast corner outside of the 0-75* zone and the 970 devatiw requiring a side setback variance. This would provide a stable structure for connection of lakeshote access staircase. Mabusth noted the proposed improvements would not hinder the location of future septic sites on this property as there b no other viable area available. The only option^ the appBcam would be a holding tank or a Hmhed septic area northeast of the house if the well is relocated on the site. The neighborhood is currently being reviewed for potential sewering in the future. ptimning Commission members voiced concern with erosion, drainage problems, and the amount eff hardcover. Discusskm revolved around the garage size and whrther a nw garaoe would be necessary or if renovation of the existing garage could be done. TheConrnasrion recommended appficant provide detailed grading. drain^e,a^ eroMOO plans for placement of garage. They also advised garage should be trinmied back to no mw than2ffx2ff. The Commission mentbers said they would not approve the proposed deck. Schroeder moved. Nolan seconded, to table Appheation #1973 until new plans could be drawn. Ayes 6. Nays I. Peterson Peterson would deny the application. (#13) #1974 TYLER CORBIN, 4685 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING • 10:13-11:0© P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Corbin was presem. ( i i f I I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 (#13 - #1974 - Corbin - Continued) Mibusdi lepofted this application is for approval of a conditional use permit and lakeshore haidcover variance for the reconstruction of retainii^ waUs within the lakeshore yard, major portions of which are located within the 0-75* setback area. The former walls were constructed of wood and had rotted and deteriorated to the point of requiring replacement. The applicam has provided silt fencing at the base of the bank to prevent further erorioo imo the lake. The applicant did not realize that permits were necessary t o replace **^1 had begun installing boulder walls. The lower levri wall that had been imtalled is approximately 3* high. Upon a site inspection, the Engineer determined the retaining walls would be over 7 in sections requiring drainage tiles and geo-tech fabric. The applicant has revised the plan, which the Engineer has approved, consisting of a 4* wide stairway and three boulder walls at 4’ in bright. The Engineer did not discuss landscapifle.«NlStaffwould recommend plantiiigs to buffer the starkness. The applicant noted that akhough thb plan calls for hardcover variance, he would be taking out gravel hardcover and replacing with grass between the waUs. The Plannmg Commission members were very concerned with the large amount of hardcover existing on tins property. There is 64% in the 75-25(7 zone. Realizirig the applicant is attempting to replace walls to retain Ms property, the Commission membem if the applicant would be willing to remove other hirdcover to reduce the exorbitant 3HfQtifit now existing The Planning Commission would like the non-conforming driveway which rum down to the lake on the cast side of the property reinc^. Theappttcant wotdd like to retain this driveway as he feds it is a vital asset to him and his use of the lake. Smith moved, 1 indgiiiu seconded, to approve Application #1974 with two added provisions: t)presentatiooofalandscaptngplaii where the retrining walls are to be installed and 2)removal of the driveway from the existing parkn^ area down to the lake over a five-year period. Ayes 6, Nays 1, Peterson, who s^ he would deny ^hc appli 'til (#14) #1975 LARRY ANHALT, 2190 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - APPEALS - PUBUC JEARING - 11:00-11:05 P.M. Applicant requested Item #1975 be tabled until the meeting of 11/21/94. Schroeder moved, Nolan seconded, to table Item #1975. Lany Anhalt, 2190 Wayzata Boulevard Ayes 7, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17.1994 (#15) #1977 LAWRENCE AND MARILYN DORR, 9S0 TONKAWA ROAD > VARIANCE-Pl/BUCHEARING- llr«5-ll:29P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Graydon McCuUey represented the applicants as well as their architect, Bruce Schmidt. Mabusth reported the applicants seek approval of an average lakeshore setback variance to afiow the construction of a nevk residence where a two-story cabin and detached gar«ge nowexist. The proposed structure will encroach 97 in from of the average lakeshore setback fine but will excavation of steeper elevafrons which would have resuhed in the loss of trees. The structure will be located out of the bhiffimpact zone and 75'*^ from lakeshore. An issue of concern is the impact of the new construction upon the lake views of the Hoffinans. neighbor to south. The peak of the house would be at the 98S* elevation. The grade level basements staru at 98(f elevation. The height difference between existing and new structures is 7. Nolan noted the house is on a point and would no longer be prorninem if moved back. The hill behind the home is the hardship in this application. The Commission members discussed tbe right of people to view a lake from side windows Planning Commission questioned the imem of the average lakeshore setback ordinance. The applicam was asked if the new residence could be dianged to minimize the effect on thenngNbors. The Dorrs said the plans were onginally for a two-story home and have been chained to a story and a half The applicant does not wish to charige the pitch on tim roof The neighbor to the north voiced her approval of the plan. She said if the home would be buih bade into the hillside, h would cause erodon and tree removal. Former owner. Graydon McCuUey, was present arxl sud this was his summer home for 3S years. He is in approval of the replacemem plan arxl have known the Dons for some time. McCuUey also said that bdng on a point is impoitam and should make a difTerence. The Commission noted the disence of the Hofimans, who are out-of-town. Several Commisnon members concurred that the topography of the property makes the presem location the reasonable location for the new structure. The Commission emphasized the need for tbe applicants and the Hoffinans to discuss the plans. Rowlette moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #1977 for an average lakeshore setback variance. Ayes 5, Nays 2, Peterson and Smith. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. \994 SKETCH PLAN ‘ ii [ 1 I ' (#16) #1978 WESTONKA INTERVENTION PROJECT, 2380 SHADY^VOOD ROAD - SKETCH PLAN PROPOSAL < NO PUBUC HEARING REQUHIED Valerie and Dan Hessburg. Exi present. ive Directors of Westoidca Intervention Project, were Mabusth reported the applicant has filed a sketch plan application requesting a zoning amendment to allow a residential shelter for battered women and their children. Orono's single fomily residential zoning does not permit such use nor does its commercial zones. Support is being sought from the Planning Commission to amend the zoning code, which would resuk in Staff presenting the findings to the City Council. The Council must first direct the Planning Commission and Staff to proceed with a zomng amendment. The area in question is the old Grace Baptist Church, located at Co Rds IS and 19 in Navarre, winch is in a LR4C zoning district. The she plan shows the topography of the area but has not yet addressed the parking issue. The floor plans reveal the lower level would be used for sleqxng unhs consisting of lune rooms to handle up to a 20-person capacity level. A kitchen facility is also available in the church. The building would house the pre^ offices as well. Mabusth noted that a sprinkler system is not required for this buikfii^i. (#16 - #1978 > Westonka Intervention Project - Continued) Mr. Hessburg informed the P'—ning Commisson members of the project's purpose, its detail, ami who would benefit firom the project. The project purpose is to break the cycle of violence prevahuit in so many relationships. This building would give the victims and their children a place to stay while determii^ their next step. The police notify the agency. Volunteer advocates pick up the victim and encourage them to place a restraining order against the alleged batterer and counsels the victim on what their options are at the time. The prefect is staffed by eight paid administrative staff, five fulltime and three parttime, and 18 volunteers. The staff is paid by the Dqrartment of Corrections and Human Services on a per-diem basis resulting in $68 per day per victim per child. Part of the per diem would pty for the facility. Other monies are received from block grant and Minnesota Finance Housing money. The plan is *o purchase the building for $190,000 with $80,000 dovm payment and financing of the remainder. The building would meet the demand of assisting 429 people per year. Statistics show the western subuibs' needs for this fiicility would surpass thiu number but have no plans for expansion. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION meeting held on OCTOBER 17. 1994 (#16 • Item #1978 - Westonka Intervertion Project - Continued) The she k)catkM is in the bean of the area scfved. The project directors see that the licifity win extend to serving all of the Like hftnnetonka area cities such as Shorewood, Excelsior, Greenwood, Tonka Bay. Deephaven. Wayzata. and Long Lake. It is a State poBcy that an police agencies najst work with an imerveiition project such as this one. The Plamang Commission expressed positive feedback on this project. Th^ did question why tins location was chosen when the southern side of Lake Minnetooka is more populated and b part of the prcject area. Hesshurg reported on losing a donated site in Mound after eight peopfe oppo^ the project. The she area was (fiscussed. No outsale play area was in the plans at this time. Parkir^ witt not be a problem since most victims arc driven to the feci^ by the volunteer advocates. Police vehicles drivii« to this fecilily wttl H few for the same reason. The fedlityb conveniently located near grocery stores and bus stop areas. It is also in tte area serviced by buses for three school districts to ease the transition for school-aged children involved. The Plaimiiig Commission members voted 7/0 to support the request to amend the zoning code in the LR-IC zoning district to allow usage of the building by the project. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#17) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 10,1994 (CHARLES NOLAN) Nolan reported the applicatioo for the Bangert property driveway was approved by the City Council 4/0, even though the Planning Commission recommended denial 4/0, because the City deemed the property buildable when it provided sewer access to the property. (#18) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Schroeder reported receipt of a letter from Patrkt*' Afeh, a friend of the Hill area. Her group wishes to acquire the land for a park preserve aiKl extended an uivitation to a meeting discussing this on 10/20/94 City Administration is looking imo the matter. jtk •rXT’ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17,1994 ADDITIONAL ITEMS (»19) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 19,1994 MEETING der moved, Lip <hp ”«» seconded, to approve the minutes of the September 19.1994 Plaimu« Commission Meetii^ as submitted. Ayes 7. Nays 0. (MO) PLANNING COMMISSION TO SELECT A REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND THE NOVEMBER 14,1994 MEETING OF THE COUNCIL Sandra Smith will attend the November 14,1994 meeting of the City Council. ADJOURNMENT Schroeder moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn the regular Planning Commission meeting at 12:00 a.m. Ayes 7, Nays 0. Charles Schroeder, Chair Person DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 9. 1994 7( SUBJECT: Saga Hilt Tax Forfeit Parcel Update Backgicund Several months ago a 9 acre tax forfeit parcel became available to the city. As with all tax forfeit parcels the city had ar. opportunity to apply to acquire the land for a public purpose. The City Council determined that this property could potentially be used as park land. At that time the city applied to the County to obtain the property at no cost for use as park land. Subsequent to the city's application the property wem through a substantial legal process to de .srmine ownership. When this process was complete and the status of the property had not changed, the County asiKd the city to reconfirm its interest in the properQr. Since that time a number of issues have arisen related to the tax forfeit parcel. These are as follows: 1. A developer has discussed a residential development, on approximately 30 acres, that would involve an exchange of the tax forfeit parcel for a similar sized parcel in the immediate area. 2. the residents of the area have joined together in an effort to preserve the entire area as open space (approximately 40 acres). 3. The city is at the very beginning of a process to develop an inventory of undeveloped parcels that may have a potential for preservation as park land. This inventory process would include the identification of the characteristics of each parcel as the basis for ranking parcels in terms of preservation priority. This process has not yet begun. These issues interrelate with the tax forfeit parcel in the following ways. A. The city can acquire the tax forfeit parcel in two ways: 1. ) Acquire the parcel for use as park land at no cost. 2. ) Purchase the parcel outright at the current assessed value ($40,000). The decision concerning how the city acquires the parcel relates directly to whether the city would be interested in the land exchange to facilitate the proposed residential development. Svgii Hill Tax Forfeit Parcel Update continued page 2 in detennining whether a portion or all of the undeveloped Saga Hill property should be preserved as park land. of infomiaiioii on which lo base a decision it may be ^ to delay a^iston both the acquisition of the tax forfeit parcel and the presetvwon rf ^tk until sufficient taLnation is available. However, two items may lead the Council lo make this decision in a shorter time frame. 1 The developer proposing the residential develop^ may request the city to m^ a decision in terms of a land exchange to assist the developer m detetmuung whether a development is feasible. The developer could also decide to bring in a development plan that would not include the tax forfeit parcel. 2 The County has asked the city to formally confirm its interest in the forfeit narcel. The city needs to confirm this interest either in relation to acquinng the parcel at no cost or in terms of purchasing the parcel for its curoij assessed value. Although the County is aware of the city’s strong interest in tto parcel, they need a formal confirmation of this interest. If the city delays, th^ounty may have other interest expressed from either public or *“”***' step in the County ’s parcel disposal process is an open bid process. If the city delays in its confirmation too long the County could be under pressure to move to this step. i^ts^of^ S^aHUl area have suggested that the city may want to plac^ [^fo ” uH on development of the approximately 40 acres of undevetop^ PTSLfof X 2^ « ^ city to complete a process of identifying and evaluating the charactenstics of tte pro^^ «the b^is for dctermiiLg whether all or some of the property should be preserved as park land. QA^Gstonfca ^nie/tmiion ^/toject November 3.1994 Mayor Edward J. Callahan Jr. City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 NOV i7 am • ■ Dear Mayor: We are pleased to be able to share with you that Westonka Intervemion Prpjea, Inc. has just been awarded Two-Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($210,000.00) from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ’s Transitional Housing Program. This grant/award was based on the application and proposal submitted by us on August 25th, 1994 for the property located at 2380 Shadywood Road, Orono. A copy of the letter of confirmation is attached. With thi* grant, together with the One-Hundred Ten Thousand ($110,000.00) that the Conservative Baptist Church of America is willing to cany on that property, affords us the opportunity not only to purchase the property but do all the renovation necessary to conven the church into a shelter. We also have had other organizations within the community come forward and make anmial financial pledges to cover any expenses that may not be covered by our approved budget or block gram fiinding from the communities we now serve and will serve in the near future. This is great news for our organization, but we do realize that this will only be possible if the citizens of Orono and their representatives approve an amendment for re-zoning for our project. We are looking forward to working with your committee of Planning Commission and Council selected to study a proposed amendment. Thank you for your imerest in our project and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours. f/^c _ Val and Dan Hessburg 472-2141 • PO. BOX 34 • i.!^UND. MINNESOTA 55364 MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY October 28,1994 Valerie Heseburg Westonka Intervention Project, Inc. 3490 Lythnjm Way Mound. MN 55364 RE: TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAM 2380 SHADYWOOD ROAD, GRONO MHFA «94-TL-5 Dear Ms. Hessburg: Thank you ter submitting an application ter funding from the Transittei^^^ Housing Program. This letter is to confirm that ycur project has been awarded $210,000. We will be sending you a Loan Commitment which provides evidence of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's willingness to, subject to stated terms and conditions, provide the grant tends. Please notify Agency staff of any significant deviations from your original proposal. Failure to receive Agency approval for changes may jeopardize the tending award. If you have any questions, please contact Glory J. Hill at (612) 296-9827. Congratulations! M.J. Tero, Director Multi-Family Development 4p0 Slr#«l, S«llt 300, St. P«ul, Minntsota jSIOI (0121296-7608 Ttl«eopi«r (612) 296-0139 TOO (612) 297-2361 E<|ti )pportunity Housing and Equal Opportunity Employmant r TH 12 Corridor Study POLICY COMMITTEE Meeting Notice & Agenda iwv ,7 Updates and Changes to Committee Lists ► Policy ► Technical ► Other Identify changes :i people / address II. Project Schedule Update ► EIS Update ► MIS Major Investment Study ► Layouts ► Next Steps III. Discussion of Affected Cities IV. Next Meetings V. Adjournment Meeting Location -* Orono City Hall WED. November 16, 1994 5:30pm TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator November 11, 1994 // SUBJECT: Draft of Cooperative Agreement for the Lx)ng Lake Water Quality Improvement Project I have attached a draft copy of the cooperative agreement for the Long Lake Improvement Project. ITh: agreement was developed by the MCWD. The portion of the agreement of most interest to Orono is Section 3.2 starting on page 7 - Local Responsibilities. The two major local responsibilities are to prepare a local water management plan for the area of the Long Lake subwatershed district, to be approved ty the MCWD; and to share the cost of operation and maintenance of the project improvements. Orono ’s share under this proposed agreement would be one-sixth of the total costs of operation and maintenance. An additional issue to be addressed is the termination of the agreement. The agreement is proposed to tenninate on December 31 of the year 2000. It is important to determine who becomes responsible for the operation and maintenance of the project improvements upon termination of the agreement. The Council may want to discuss this agreement in a work session. r P O 1> II A M 11 AIK u s 0*» • O t «• * t • c: J k • • r> ' Tf L 'O ) A * 1 ’•* M aw. rk.J«'OA ' t . 5 J J OC^C •€ 3300 S ' M. UNt AP.'f i M «. nE5»i’* TC V 6 1^ 333 4dOO »'*• 612 334 iw*t***A* '•••i 3'* • C*'49 »4t 4^«n4;4 sS<*«***«’ iAraSM.a»6 *0*i O C Tf V iO» «•! • *00 UOUIl N. SMITH OIRCCT Dial <612) 334-6731 Ociober 31. 1994 Mayor Tod Olson City of Long Lake 1964 Park Avenue Long Lake. MN 55340 Ronald J. Moorsc City Administrator City of Orono P.d Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Jeffrey E. Karlson City Clerk-Treasurer City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Hamel. MN 55340 Re; Long Lake Improvement Project: Cooperative Agreement Dear Mavor Olson. Mr. Moorse and Mr. Karlson; Enclosed is a draft copy of the Cooperative Agreement for the Long Lake Improvement Project. The Agreement is still in draft form, and any comments or suggestions you have are welcome. Please note that Hennepin County has been included as a parly to the Agreement; the County ’s role is to provide the project interim financing pending the Watershed District s receipt of its property tax settlements. Please do not hesitate to call me with question.s or comments; you may also contact MCWD Manager Martha Hartfiel at 473-8806. Verv truly vours. Louis N .Smiih Attorney lor ihe Minnehaha Creek 0 Watershed Distnci cc: MCWD Board of Managers Mike Panzer :7VI4074297 10/11/94 J r COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the Long Lake Improvement Project This Cooperative Agreement is made on this___day of___, 1994, by and between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (hereinafter referred to as "MCWD"), a watershed district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D; the City of Long Lake (hereinafter referred to as "City of Long Lake"), a body corporate and politic and a statutory city in the State of Miimesota; the City of Orono (hereinafter referred to as "Orono"), a body corporate and politic and a statutory city in the State of Minnesota; the City of Medina (hereinafter referred to as "Medina"), a body corporate and politic and a statutory city in the State of Minnesota; and Hennepin County, a body corporate and politic and a county in the State of Minnesota. 1. RgfitflN Mnd Statement of Pui ji WHEREAS, Long Lake is situated approximately two miles north of Lake Minnetonka in western Hennepin County and its watershed, encompassing an area of 6,860 acres, includes the City of Long Lake and portions of Orono and Medina; WHEREAS, Long Lake has a public boat landing and two public swimming beaches; the lake has been used historically for recreation and has a high potential for future recreational use. but water quality degradation currently impairs swimming and fishing; 275/14070523 |(V)i/94 WHEREAS, the Long Lake subwatershed drains into Lake Minnetonka and, consequently, any improvements to water quality in Long Lake will have a positive, district wide effect; WHEREAS, in 1989, the MCWD received a Clean Water Partnership Grant to investigate lake water quality and characterize and quantify the sources contributing to the decline in water quality; thereafter, the MCWD proceeded to develop an implementation plan (hereinafter "Implementation Plan") to set forth specific actions to be undertaken to improve the water quality; WHEREAS, the MCWD has an approved Water Resources Management Plan which identifies Long Lake as a priority resource, and the MCWD’s Capital Improvement Program identifies water quality improvement projects in the Long Lake area as priority projects; WHEREAS, the Cities of Long Lake, Orono and Medina and Hennepin County have, through their governing bodies, expressed support for the Long Lake Improvement Project; WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that their ability to improve the water quality in Long Lake ir accordance with the Implementation Plan is dependent upon each party satisfactorily and promptly performing its individual obligations and working cooperatively with the other parties as to those tasks which are to be jointly undertaken; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties that they enter into this Cooperarive Agreement in order to document the understanding of the parties as to the scope of the entire project; reaffirm the commitment of each party as to the general responsibilities and tasks to be undertaken by each party; establish procedures for performing these tasks and responsibilities; and facilitate communication and cooperation 275/14070525 IO/Jl/94 among the parties to ensure successful completion of the project through the construction of stormwater treatment systems to reduce nutrient loadings, implementation of best watershed management practices, in*lake improvements, and public education programs, in order to achieve the ultimate goal of improving water quality in Long Lake. Definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms shall have the meanings given in this paragraph. 2.1. "City" or "Cities" shall mean the cities of Long Lake, Orono. and Medina. collectively. 2.2. "Improvements" refers collectively to the following stormwater u-eaunent systems: sedimentation basins, detentiun/retention of runoff, stormwater diversions restoration of wet detention pond/weiland areas, construction of wet detention ponds/wetland treatment systems, and construction of aeration systems. 2.3 "Monitoring Plan" shall mean the water quality monitoring plan developed to identify the specific sampling procedures, analytic methods, detection limits, quality assurance and quality conivol procedures in order to facilitate the accurate measurement of baseline data and any changes in water quality throughout the Long Lake subwatershed for the duration of this project 2.4. "Routine Operation and Maintenance Costs" shall mean the periodic sediment removal and general site maintenance necessary to keep fences, grass, etc. in good order and appearance. 275/1407QS23 UV3I/94 J ! 3. General ResponsIhlUties of Parties 3.1. MCWD The MCWD shall be responsible for the design, construction, and technical maintenance and operation of the stormwater treatment systems for the purpose of reducing internal and external phosphorous loading into Long Lake. These systems shall consist of sedimentation basins, detention/retention of runoff, stormwater diversions, restoration of wet detention pond/wetland areas, construction of wet detention ponds/wetland treatment systems specifically designed to remove nutrients from stormwater runoff, and construction of aeration systems to maintain areas of well oxygenated water (hereinafter referred to collectively as "improvements"). 3.1.1. The parties anticipate the construction of two hypolimnetic aerators, one for each basin of Long Lake, to reduce in-lake phosphorous loading. The parlies al:;o anticipate the construction of three wet detention ponds/wetlands to treat external phosphorous loading; one between County Road No. 6 and the DNR protected wetland adjacent to the north side of Long Lake, and two connected basins adjacent to Long Lake in a city designated park. These systems will be selected and designed by MCWD. based upon a determination of their feasibility as provided below in sub-paragraphs 3,1.3 through 3.1.5 of this paragraph of the Agreement 3.1.2. The MCWD will pay for the installation of structural fish barriers at the outlet of Long Lake, at the outlet of the Long Lake City Park wet detention pond/wetland, and at the outlet of the County Road No. 6 wet detention pond/welland, subject to assumption of the 275/14070525 10/31/94 I J r ongoing barrier maintenance and cleaning by Long Lake and Orono, as discussed below in paragraph 3.2.4 of this Agreement 3.1.3. The MCWD shall present to each of the other parties to this Agreemenu and to the Project Advisory Committee pursuant to paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement, a feasibility report prepared by the MCWD District Engineer concerning each improvement or set of improvements for review and comment prior to public hearing. 3.1.4. Following the distribution of a feasibility report by the MCWD District Engineer to parties to this Agreement and the Project Advisory Committee, and following due notice to the public as required by law, the MCWD shall hold a public hearing on each proposed improveraenL 3.1.5. The MCWD shall order each improvement only upon a determination by the MCWD Board of Managers that the improvement will be conducive to the public health and promote the general welfare, and is in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 103B.205 to 103B.255, and the MCWD Water Resources Management Plan adopted pursuant to Section 103B.231, make findings accordingly, determine the cost of the improvement, and certify the cost before October first of each year to Hennepin County and Carver County for payment 3.1.6. The MCWD shall prepare the design plans and specifications for each ordered improvement, and present them to each party to this Agreement and to the Project Advisory Committee pursuant to paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement for review and comment prior to public hearing for a minimum period of no less thirty (30) days. 3.1.7. No less than thirty (30) days following the distribution of the design plans and specifications fo each ordered improvement from the MCWD to parties to this Agreement 27V14070523 l(yjl/94 and the Project Advisory Committee, and following due notice to the public as required by law, the MCWD shall hold a public hearing on each design plan and specification; the MCWD shall approve the design plan and specification for each ordered improvement based upon the review and comments of the parties to this Agreement, and the record of the public hearing, and upon a determination that the improvement will be conducive to the public health and promote the general welfare, and is in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 103B.205 to 103B.255, and the MCWD Water Resources Management Plan adopted pursuant to Section 103B.231. 3.1.8. The MCWD shall be responsible for the selection of the contractor or contractors to perform the construction of the ordered improvements in a manner consistent with stale law. The MCWD shall also be responsible for the negotiation of construction contracts, and the supervision of the project construction. 3.1.9. The MCWD shall be responsible for planning and conducting any necessary environmental reviews in connection with the ordered improvements. 3.1.10. The MCWD shall be responsible for obtaining any governmental permits, and private approvals or property rights necessary for the construction, maintenance, and operation of the improvements, subject to paragraph 3.2.S of this Agreement: the parties anticipate that it will be necessary to acquire private interests to real property and the parties agree to cooperate in identifying the most effective and efficient means by which to acquire such private property interests. 3.1.11. The MCWD shall be responsible for preparing a plan for the operation and maintenance (hereinafter "Maintenance Plan") of the improvements, including ongoing 27VI4070325 KV3I/94 monitoring, and presenting such a plan to the Project Advisory Committee for review and comment pursuant to paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement 3.1.12. The MCWD shall be responsible for the entire project costs associated with the feasibility analysis, design, operation and maintenance of the improvements, subject to City responsibility for routine maintenance costs as described in paragraph 3.2.3 of this Agreement The MCWD shall be responsible for all operating costs, including electricity, of the Long Lake aeration system. 3.1.13. The MCWD agrees that the MCWD District Engineer ’s feasibility reports and designs for the improvements in the area of the Lc.'.j ; subwatershed, as identified in the map attached to this Agreement for reference as Appendix A, shall be provided to the Cities; further, the MCWD agrees that these documents may constitute a substantial basis for the preparation of the local water management plans for the Cities of Long Lake, Orono, and Medina for the area identified in Appendix C, and that upon proper endorsement, completion, and resubmittal of these documents to the MCWD, the MCWD will approve them pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 103B.235, subdivision 3. 3.2. Local Responsibilities (Cities of Long Lake, Orono, Medina) 3.2.1. The Cities agree to prepare local water management plans for the area of the Long Lake subwatershed identified in Appendix A to this Agreement, based upon the feasibility reports, design plans, and specifications for this project prepared by the MCWD and any other relevant information identified by the Cities, including plans for implementing best management practices as provided for in sub-paragraph 3.2.2. of this paragraph to this Agreement; the Cities agree that prior to construction of any of the MCWD stormwater 275/14070923 KV3I/V4 r I ! • treatment improvements, the Cities will submit their local water management plans for the area of the Long Lake subwatershed within their cities to the MCWD for its review and approval pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section I03B.235. subdivision 3. 3.2.2. The Cities agree to develop policies and disseminate information, subject to paragraph 5.4 of this Agreement, on a variety of best management practices relating to water quality, including but not limited to the following: -yard waste management -urban fertilizer management -livestock waste management -agricultural practices 3.2.3. The Cities agree to share in the Routine Operation and Maintenance Costs of the wet detention ponds/wetlands, as defined in the maintenance plan described in paragraph 3.1.11 of this Agreement, in accordance to the following cost sharing formula: one-half of the costs apportioned to MCWD. one-sixth of the costs apportioned to the City of Long Lake, one-sixth of the costs apportioned to Orono, and one-sixth of the costs apportioned to Medina. 3.2.4. The City of Long Lake agrees to be responsible for any necessary cleaning associated with the structural fish barrier to be installed in Long Lake and in the Long Lake City Park wet detention pond/wetland. 3.2.5. Orono agrees to be responsible for any necessary cleaning associated with the structural fish barrier to be installed in the County Road No. 6 wet detention pond/wetland. 275/14070523 10^1/94 3.2.6. The City of Long Lake agrees to provide to MCWD, for one dollar and other valuable consideration, the land rights necessary to hold the on-shore support system necessary to maintain the proposed aeration system. 3.3. Hennepin County Hennepin County agrees to provide the necessary interim financing to MCWD for the activities identified in this Agreement as MCWD responsibilities. Hennepin County’s financial responsibility to this Agreement will be limited to that provided for in Minnesota Statutes Section 103B.251. 4. Monitoring Plan MCWD agrees to develop and implement a water quality monitoring plan ("Monitoring Plan") which will identify the specific sampling procedures, analytic methods, detection limits, quality assurance and quality control procedures in order to facilitate the accurate measurement of baseline data and any changes in water quality throughout the Long Lake subwatershed for the duration of this project The Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the Project Advisory Committee described in paragraph 5.1 of this Agreement, on or before May 1, 1995 for review and comment by all parties to this Agreement before any actions implementing the Monitoring Plan are commenced. On or before June 1, following review and comment by the Project Advisory Committee, the Monitoring Plan shall be agreed upon and adopted by all parties as an amendment to this Agreement The MCWD shall be responsible for the selection of a qualified laboratory to perform the data analysis required by the Monitoring Plan and shall be responsible for the costs of the laboratory sample analysis. 275/14070323 10/31/94 1.1 5. Protect Advisory Committee 5.1. A Project Advisory Committee shall be created to provide technical consultation on engineering and environmental aspects of projects developed under this Agreement, to provide comments and technical advice on the Monitoring Plan described in paragraph 4 of this Agreement, and the designs, plans, and specifications of each project component, and to provide preliminary consultation to the parties on specific technical matters that will eventually be submitted to one or more agencies for a permit or other approval. The Project Advisory Committee shall also be responsible for appointing a Public Education Sub committee to coordinate the public education efforts by the Cities, as provided in paragraph 3.2.2 of this Agreement 5.2. The members of the Project Advisory Committee shall consist of one representative from each party to this Agreement as selected by the governing body of that party, as well as the voluntary representatives identified in sub-paragraphs 5.3 of this paragraph. 5.3. The Project Advisory Committee shall be chaired by an MCWD Manager selected by the MCWD Board of Managers, and shall consist of at least one citizen representative from Long Lake, Orono, and Medina, to be appointed by each city’s respective City Council and to serve at the expense of each respective city. The Project Manager shall invite the following agencies to appoint one representative to serve on the Project Advisory Committee at each individual agency’s expense: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Department of Natural Resources 275/14070523 10/31/94 Department of Health Department of Agriculture Hennepin Conservation District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Council 5.4. Each party to this Agreement shall appoint one of its members to serve on the Public Education Sub-committee. All written, audio, or video public education materials prepared by any party shall be presented to the Public Education Sub-committee for review and comment prior to their distribution; all educational materials distributed to the public must identify each party to this Agreement as a project sponsor. 6. Project Manaeer 6.1. The MCWD Board of Managers shall be responsible for appointing the Project Manager, to serve at the MCWD’s expense. 6.2. The Project Manager shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of the Project; coordinating communication between the parties to this Agreement; and preparing quarterly progress reports to the Project Advisory Committee. 275/14070523 KV31/94 i i 7.Dispute Resolution In the cveni that disputes arise between the parties with regard to rights and responsibilities under this Agreement, the parties agree to first attempt to resolve the dispute among themselves through discussions between their respecuve supervisory staff persons. If the dispute cannot be resolved in this manner, it shall be referred to the Project Advisory Committee for resolution. If the dispute cannot be resolved in this manner, the parties agree to refer the dispute first to mediation and. if not successfully resolved at mediaUon, to binding arbiiraUon, The mediator or arbitrator shall be selected by the following process. Each party to the Agreement shall propose two persons having specific expertise and knowledge relating to the specific issues in dispute, but who are not employees, consultants, or agents of any of the parties. In an order randomly assigned, each party may strike two names from the list, one at a time. The last person remaining on the list shall be the mediator or arbitrator. [Consider other alternatives.] 8. Termination and Renewal of Agreement This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2000, and may be renewed for another five year term by written agreement of all parties hereto. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by the written agreement of all parties hereto, 9. Amendments This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. 10. Norice Notices to the parties to the Agreement shall be given by hand delivery or first class mail addressed to the following representatives of each party to this Agreement: [Insert list] 27VI4070523 UVJl/M r [Signatures] 27V14070523 I(V3l/M STATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION : hj t - 10CJLJ. V » In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company to Establish an Electric Rate Discount for Certain Low-Income Customers Docket No. E002/M-94-925 SUMMARY OF FILING Please take notice that on October 5, 1994 Northern Slates Power Company ("NSP") filed with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission ("Commission ) its petition to establish an electric rate discount for certain iow-income residential customers. The proposed discount is required by Minn. Stat. Sect. 216B. 16, subd. 14 (1994). In general, electric residential customers who are receiving assistance from the federally funded Low-Income Heating Energy Assistance Program ("LIHEAP") will receive a discount equal to one-half of their energy charge each month for usage up to 300 kWh per month. The total amount of discounts for the first year is estimated at $6,084,000. NSP is proposing to recover this revenue loss by elimination of the Conservation Rate Break and by an increase in charges to residential electric customers, effective January 4,1 995. The increase in charges would be accomplished by a one time increase in the energy charge of 0.02 cents per kilowatihour or by use of an automatic adjustment mechanism through which the rate surcharge would be reconciled with actual experience and readjusted annually for projected future changes. If the automatic adjustment mechanism is selected, the increase would be combined with the existing fuel adjustment clause on the bill in a Resource and Tax Adjustment Clause". r STATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company (Electric) for Approval of an Adjustment Clause for Property Taxes, Fees and Permits Docket No. E002/M-94-915 SUMMARY OF FILING Please take notice that on September 30. 1994. Northern States Power Cornoaiy TnSP") f led with the Minnesota Public Utiliues Comm.ss.on ^^^?ZmLion"l its pet tion for approval of an adjustment clause for property taxes, ees”^i. ppSe to its'^Minnesota jurisdictional electnc operatton^T^^^^ pro^adjustmern clause is permitted by Minn. Stat. Sect.on 2 6B.241 suW^ 2b^ NSP oroDOses to implement the adjustment clause on its electric bills effective Janu^ L 1995. The proposed adjustment clause is designed to ^^roug electric rates an amount equal to the increase in property tax expense between ^ 1993 test year and NSP’s projected 1995 expense and annually each The total increase in revenues and rates for 1995 is estimated at 516,560,794^ vear the adjustment would be reconciled with actual experience and rea j projecied fmure increases. The revenue increases resulting from ''jf Mliated to customers based on their respective revenues and ° beginning January 1. 1995. The new adjustment would be combined on electnc bills with the existing luel adjustment clause. i STATE OF MINNESOTA before the MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company (Electric Utility) for Approval of an Annual Recoveiy Mechamsm for Conservation Improvement Program Expenses Docket No. E002/M-94-1016 SUMMARY OF FILING la a., Minn. Rules 7820.3500 and 7825.2600. res^ctivel^ 2'® 16. subd 5sdes^edTr “J^f^^^ increase sufficient to recover an additional $10 580.74/. or u / j p . NSP proposes to implement the adjustment clause on its electitc b January 1, 1995. m: Message From The Editor Z hIS is the INAL CL R,\L ISSI E OF GREiZNStNSt. A NEWSLETTER FOR Citizens, public ofticids. business people, and professionals about public hindinc to con serve disnncnv e natural, histone, recreational, scienntic. and scenic resources Great chance is underway in the value .\mencans place on their ieeaev ol parks and open spaces. This is ex'ideni on the ground in communities across the nanon. in the large number of citizen groups working to sa\ e special places, and in mcrea>ed pnv ate donations for local conserv anon pro»eci.«. It is also e\ ident in the arrival oJ a neu era tor public funding tor parks and open space Increasinglw parks and recreation are seen as green infrastructure *— basic investments that make a communin* work. Public dollars, while far from adequate, arc beginning to reflect this growing recognition. .\n electronic search of news anicies about proposed and recent communin* and state funding for parks and open space in 199^ turned up over .o.OOO hits, lust through .August* GREENSKNSE will’ • Exchance information about public financing strategics tor land conservation • Examine the national implirations of these local conserv ation funding efforts • Build networks among people developing innov anve conserv arion finance approaches. GhEEINS en SE vsill emphasize state and local spending — because that s where much of the money is \V*e want to hear from vou. How* did vou find the money to fund a land project? Tell us about vour search and vour solutions. \A*e will try to answer your questions about others* strategies, or pose them to our readers in this column And we are micrcsied in your comments about Gre ENS en SE. W hat ideas and suggestions do v ou hav e for making ^REENS ens E a useful forum for c.Nchanging information on conservation funding .' The E-mail address is greensense@igc.apc.org Or write Editor. Gr EENS en SE. 1616 P Street. .VW*. Suite -415. Washington. D.C 20036. or call (202) 79“.S-^02 S Published bv: TRUST The Trust for Public Land PUBLIC LAND Editorial address: Phyllis Alvers. Editor C O State Resource Strategies 1616 P Street. N W. Suite 415 Washington. D C. 20056 (202) 797-5^02 116 New Montgomen* Street Fourth Floor San Francisco. CA 9-4105 (415) 495-4014 Jh9 Trv« for Public Umi a s nociptofit orf«munon O 1994 Thm Tniw for Public Lam I sad tbsi bdpt *nd ctMuauaiiy froupt act^uire Ph\'Ui* Mvari. Stair Rrtourcr StrBiSfwt and pePMCt conaervaaon lands for public uia. All nfbis rwrvrd. Gr EENS ens E is disiribuied as a complimentan' service to public finance and conierv'anon professionals. To order, call (800) 0 H-L.AND. /wC' ct*niuuuu^ frt'0fu t\uu' / of \*Mn of underifivYstmenc.% Lawxnakers also provided S19 million tor buvine land in the Pine Barrens and .Adirondack Park, gave the Hudson River Creenway CATuncil and Conservanev budgets a nice b<x>st. and Jan • .\W 1^*^ Jan • .NW 1995 iiMt A ter* adopted a statewide Open Space Plan, developed with extensive citizen input. 10 guide suic and local spending. • Delaware directed a third of its S60 million surplus 10 state parks. The $20 million appropriation replaces bonds scheduled for nc.vt v*ear. The upfront cash, supponed by the govc -nor and fiscal adv'isors. adds interest dollars to Delawares land buving program and saves bonding transaction costs B State Support^ Pose Risk Fcm * Land Conservation State elections into a presidenoal term arc closel v watched for national trends. Which poliri- al parn* scored m gm emors races ’ How .aany new members wiU each pam send .o the L’.S. Concress? W hat does this mean for the Big Elecnon in mo \ears ^ The outcome ot this No\ ember s races tor 56 governorships and some 6.000 statehouse seats will also be cnncal for decisions closer to home. Will the gosemor support a new land acquisition • jnding inirianve? W^lll lawmakers approve an adequate budget lor parks and recreation? Will they authorize a tow n bond or ta-x measure? Will a land ^tcquisition trust lund be di\ ened lor a landfill? Statchouscs have also seen bat tles over a number of pnvaie propern* rights measures, most of w hich hav e up to now* been defeated or weakened. Overlooked in Washington. D C - •sKTUsed election coverage arc nv o impoaant trends w hich provide clues to •ne political climate in which state and local conscn alion policy issues vvill be debated. The first trend is good news. Conserx anon has a place on political aiiendas in a number ot states, ev en though crime, health, and education head he list Notably, a number ot gov emor? hav e spoken out in tavorot saving land. Gov. Roy Romer (D - Colorado), lor example, told state legiLlaiors: “I want Coloradans 50years trom now ... to look back at us as the generanon that had the vision to preserve open spaces. .\nd tiscol conservative Gov. Chnsrine Todd Wlnirman iR - New Jersey) commended New vJersev ans for approving a recent Green .\cres park bond: Thev know a wise in\esTTnent when they see one ‘ The covemors reasons^ .^\ost often, thev mennon the ta\ orable impact on Tounsm revenues and lobs. Others emphasize the importance ol outdoor expenences to piersonal values and tamilv bonds. Sev eral, like Romer. sp>ea* eio- quenily about preserving their states quaiiu of life, beauty, and special lands for the ne.xt generation. High marks for green advocacy were also a plus in balancing election slates. Former state legislators with good conser vation credentials rtinning lor higher oifice include Oregon s KJohn KitZnaber ( D) a candidate lor governor Also. .NVarvlands Sen. Bemic Fowler (D) and prospect is widespread enough to merit a cover stcry in >V ju * on *Windls of change ’ blowing over statehouses. !n change there is opf>oriunm , the saving goes But there is another side. ‘W'e re losing established leadership, warns Tom Novick ol the Western States Center. Among retirees are lawmakers v\ ho came to ottice nding the env iron- mental vv av es ot the 1^*' Os and hav e since mov ed into leadership positions. Conservation stalwarts not running again include Colorado Rep. Ruth W’light (D). w ho helped retain the stale s loncry for land conservation and parks: Pennsv K ama Rep. J. W illiam Lincoln { D). the 1995 maionn leader who helpied steer the success!ul bipartisan proposal lor a dedicated lund through the legisla ture; and Maryland Sen. Gerald “At the end of the ne.xt centun*. what you do this \ ear to presen e \ ermont’s workinir farms and working forests will have a far greater impact than even our successes in health care or propert\' tax reform.” — Gov Hov.ar^i Dean t.» \-.’moni Sen. How ard Denis (R). and Flonda s Sen. Cun Kiser (R). resigned to seek lieutenant £overnors scats The second trend poses more uncer tainty. Political pundits predict that res ignations. renremenis. redistnenng after the 1990 Census, and term limits may result in a third or more new* legislators in a number ol statenouses. The W’megrad <D). who has provided sieadv support lor .\\ary land s pioneering Program Open Space. With cniicaJ land funding issues certain for next year s state legislative aff^enda. conservanonists will need to move quickly to educate the new crop of »rov ernors and state lawmakers. 0 PhvUis 4N\\*ers. EdUtor V‘i • \ [■ i dollar bills Georgia {| l«gi»Uture appiwed • S25 million bond to help Gov. Zell AWler (D), a sportsman and conienationisi. iiiUill his promise to protect 100.000 seres during His first term. .About a third of the SI00 million program is funded by an increase in hunting and fishing fees, a third by general appropria- tions. and another third by federal Hinds and donations. Kentucky created a Heritage Land Consenation Fund to pay for nature preserves, state parks, foresu. and wild rivers. The fund wll raise about So to S7 million annually from three sources: en%-i- ronmental license plates, ens-ironmental fines, and — here’s a new one! — a share of the unmined minerals tax. Revenues on the latter tax are expected to increase as a result of the state s CIS s\stem. The fund has good support from Cov. Brereton C. Jones (D) and business, tim ber. and coal interests as well as the en\n- ronmentai communin-. It provides grants for sute. local, and private proiecu. and S800.000 for coal education. Kentucky lawmakers also set up a trust fund for operations from a set-aside from park user fees. A new SIO million dedicated park fund app rov ed in North Carolusa. The fund tareets e.xpected increments in real estate transfer taxes lor state parks, endangered lands, cin- and counn- parks, and beach access. It has strong support from Gov. James B. Hunt (D). local newspapers, and a broad civic alliance. Passage was held up. however, by a key state lawmaker opposed to dedicated revenues (although not to helping parks). .Another vote is needed next session to ensure the full set-aside of ta.\ revenues. higher yields .After recent ravaging floods. Missouri officials want to bey 6*1.000 acres of flood-damaged river frontage and return it to forests and wildlife habttat. The U.S. Department of .Agriculture and Fish and Wildlife Service will buv easements and land. Analyses show that moving homes and farms away from the n\ er is cheaper than constructing levees and clearing heavily silted land to rebuild. .Missouri is setting aside SIO million for partnership purchases, thanks to revenues from its 1/8 cent dedicated sales ta-x. .AUssouri ’s Nature Conserv ancx- office is helping state and federal oincials and farmers knit the novel arrangement (osether .Marcia Reiss, of New York Citx 's Parks Council, wants to remove the cin*’s parks department from the citj- bureau- crac>-. She proposes a strong parks com mission. vvith authoritx* to raise ta.xes and park user fees and dedicate the revenues to park spending. New Aork Citx* now spends less than half of 1 percent of its budget on parks and deposits fee revenues in the ciw treasutx-. Reiss also points to the cin ’s good e.xperience vvith Bm ant Park and other special improvement districts, where commercial real estate owners pay a propern* tax add-on to upgrade and improve public spaces. new DEALS Fast-growing Denver gains S2 million a year for parks and open space from a cit\'-owned ski area 90 miles away. The cin’s Winter Park is operated under a pri vate lease which generated only S".000 a vear until recently. Denver Ma\*or % Wellington Webb is credited with negoti ating the new arrangement and targeting increased revenues to land acquisition an< recreation facilities. The cin* has some unique open space opportunities, includ ing Sttpleton airport and a soon-to-be- decommissioned militaiy airbase. More help to pay for land conservation «s on thv way. thanks to the state s CO Colorado fund and a public-private fund-raising in: dative sparked by Laurie Mathews, Colorado's sute park director, and the Conserv ’arion Fund. A new state law enables California cities and communhiei to create special diitricu and provide ongoing, stable funding of loealfy based efforts to pre serve species, habitat, and open space. The funding source for these habiut maintenance assessment districu. as ihev are known, will come from a propern* , assessment approved by voters for a penod of up to 30years. Revenues are to be dedicated to acquisition and manage ment of wildlife habiut in conjunenon with California's Department of Fish and Game. .An historic railroad trail is the core oft S3 million plan to preserv*e 1,2-10 tim- berland acres for Washington State. .A coalition of hikers. environmenuUsts. an. kav akers organized by the Riverlands 1 A til GRHEINSEr'SE O Conservancy hopes to match a S250.000 state contribution uith monev from* Snohomish Counn*s Conser%*anon Futures, a local 6.25 propern* assess ment to buy natural lands. King Counrv* recently used a S7 million annual stream from this local tax to float a S60 million bond. The Evergreen .Agenda works with citizens and local ofTicials lo encour age wider use of the coun^* ta.\ option and to build support for a sustained con servation fund. The Pine Barrens plan in eastern Long Island* New York, was completed on time. Modeled after New Jersey ’s sue-% cessful Pinelands cfTon. the plan envi sions a oj.lOO-acre protected core of sen sitive resources and compatible develop ment in the surrounding 47.000 acres. Next steps include a counn7state collabo ration to acquire some 12.000 acres and a transfer of development rights program to compensate owners oi core properties b\- establishing a sv’stem by which thev* can sell or use development potential in desig nated zones. Chief critics are builders — despite provisions for development — and towns slated for denser growth. MITIGATION New Jersc|^’*s Department of Environmental Protection and Energy* (DEPE) has established a S2.5 million fund to protect the environmvntallv sensitive Barnegat Bay watershed. The fund is part of a larger 199‘J water poliu- rion settlement beixveen DEPE and Ciba- Geigj' G>rporation. Tne Trust for Public L^d. which has helped jcqaire key properties valued at S8.75 million for the Fonvthe National \\ lidliie Refuee. is overseeing the awani. Two million dol lars will be used to capiulize a land acquisition fund, and S500.000 will create an endowment for small environmental education grants to nonprofits. CAPITAL NOTES The S30,2 billion crime bill finalK* was I I approv ed b\' Congress, The National ! Recreation and Park Association esti mates that park and recreation officials and communirv'-based groups potentialIv have access to some S3 billion of fundinff which could be used for recreation pro grams designed to reduce crime amon£ vouth in high-risk environments. Budget lines to look at include S580 million in block grants and model intensive grants (mainly for large cities). .Much about the availabiiin* of funding is still unclear at this writing. “An American Network of Parks and Open Space." A mid*August "white paper" b\* a specially appointed National Park Service committee recommends "reinventing" federal assistance to the nation s nervvork of parks and open space. The committee, comprised of public and private conserv*anon and park leaders, wants to see a substantial share of federal dollars targeted to state and local pro grams and a new national endowment to manage the initiative. To fund its billion- doUars-a-year pi ^ ^sai. it urges reclaim ing offshore oil reven «cs promised to con servation in 1965 but which have since been used to offset the federal deficit. The committee, chaired by Frances S. Buchhoizcr. Director of Ohio's Department of Natural Resources, will build support for its recommendations in the grassroots and in Congress, where Reps. George Miller (D-CA) and Bruce F. \ enio (D-MN) are behind the measure. HLTD is expected to announce winners in its $5,5 billion communi^' empower* ment imtiative by the end of the year. Nine empowerment zones arc slated to share S2.5 billion in tax incentives and SI00 million in cash, and 95 enterprise communities will receive grants of $5 mil lion each. Over 500 communities entered the competition. The program has a wel come receptivin* to environmental improvements as part of comprehensive, collaborative approaches to bring jobs, education, housing, and hope to .America s troubled urban communities. DIVIDENDS Scottsdale, Ariaona is debating whether to dev'elop or preser>*e the e.xtensive McDowell Mountains and desert acreage on the city s edge. The price tag for preservation is about SI00 million. Newspaper reporter Pete Chasar looked into the cin* budget and found that devel opment would be c.xpensiv e. too: $410 million for capital improvements. S19 mil lion for education. S95 million for trans- ponanon. and S56 million Tor drainaire and flood control. Says Chasar. "there could be an even greater cost — loss of the cin *s scenic VXcsiem image." With tourism adding SI.35 billion to Scottsdales economy, "its dev*elopment that we can t afford. Preserving the .^lcDowells is a banrain." f #: -m. Iv I ISTEA: Linking Con Conservation And Tr; IN’TERMODAL SURFACE Transportarion Efficiency Act (ISTEA) introduced revolurionan* changes in the nation s huge transportation trust fund. Ol most interest to consenarionists. a new enhancements program makes at least S3^ billion available over a 6-vear m period for historic sites, open space, bike paths, rail trails, scenic easements, and other communi^* assets. Over 2,000 enhancement projects, valued at almost a billion dollars, have been funded so far. Some outstanding ones include: • CaiUbmia. Purchase of the 270-acre Rank Island to protect the San Joaquin River Parkway scenic viewshed was assisted by S3.-1 million in ISTEA funds. The island, rich in biodiversitv. is a recognised resource of stateuide importance. The state s Environmental Enhancement and .Mitigation Program pro\Hdcd an additional S-IOO.OOO. • Woodbridge. New Jersey* Renewal of a deteriorated downtown train station has been combined with measures to revitalize nearby businesses and an his toric park. Parking fees will be placed in a fund for station area maintenance to be managed by local merchants. ISTEA is providing S463.000 of the S965.000 project. • Minneapolis* Minnesota- Cedar Lake Park, the first new ci^ park in 70 years, consists of 100 acres of lake- shore, natural areas, and bike and com muting trails only a mile and a half from downtown. The funding partner ship includes state, metro, and pr^ ate funds, and 5500,000 from ISTEA lor trails. Despite progress. ISTEAs imple mentation has glitches. Much of the available money is still unspent. .Approved projects move slowly. Changes being discussed include: • Fostering private partnerships- Bureaucratic rules constrain use of private funds for the 209b local match. ISTEA officials are looking at wavs to^ % make the program more receptive to vrin-win private matches. • Increasing use of 1STE.A funds to buy consert'acion lands. .According to the best estimates, only 171 enhancement projects have involved land purchases. Some states welcome using ISTEA funds for acquisition, but others hav'e set up roadblocks. • Ensuring greater consistency. Enhancement projects are shaped bv 50 different state transportation plan ning sv'stems. While diversity provides lle.xibili^*. it is also a source of confusion. A nonprofit coalition is monitoring the ISTEA enhancements program to ensure chat dollars are spent, as Congress intended, to change fundamental plan ning processes. Says David Burw eil. president of Rails-to-Trails Conservanev', a prime mover in shaping ISTEA "Me are most interested in enhancement projects that reinforce the social and eco nomic fabric of communities, reduce pol lution, increase transponacion options, and foster sustainable development." O greenspaces bond is being crafted for 1995. Passage of the cin-'s Rx-up bond comes first, says Charles Jordan. Ponland s park director. The public really wants this," Douglas Counnv Colorado. In Denver s rapidly grouing environs, aid cent sales tax increase would venerate about S2.2 million annually lor open space, trails, and active parks. The citizen initia- fiv'e has a 15-year sunset. Larimer Coun^; Colorado- .Also near Denver, a 1/4 cent sales tax hike pro- posed by coun^' commissioners would raise 526 million over / v*ears. Acquisition and major development are slated for over tu>'o-thirds of the funds, and operations and maintenance for the remainder. St- Lucie Couniy» Fhirida- .About an hour s drive north from West Palm Beach, a 520 million bond, backed by a small proper^* tax increase, would help buy environmentally significant lands. A new special district, financed by a property aiiettment: Sacramento Coun^* California* People for Safe Parks, a coun^-approved measure, would levy an average yearly increase of $10 per proper^ to fund a new park district. Bonding the revenues would raise 526.5 million o\*er 30 vears. In primaries held earlier chisyeaTf a number of land funding mea sures passed muster with voters* In San Anconio, Texas, local resi dents handily approxed a S4I.6 million park acquisition and rehabilitation bond marketed as a "qualiw of life investment." Said ALiyor Nelson WoHF. the vote sends a message to the ciwsyouth "that we are committed to providing recreational space and activities for them." Voters in two regional open space dis tricts approved small proper^ assessmenu to buy rural open space, greenways. and trails. In Santa Clara Coun^* California, a 512 average annual assessment xvill raise TOsrrrr..^ i/,\T>)5. ■ v; •r'iin •T : a^r i >■■ h f” ’ $3.8 million. The new Santa C!ara author. tP. is modeled atiter nearby .^VidPeninsula and East Bay open space districts. .And north ot Chicago. Illinois, l^ke Coiinct' Forest Presence \ oten approved a SoO Tiulion bond, with S20 million tar£eted to and purchase. The measure is funded b\ a 20-\Yar proper^* assessment. Bonds Hnanced by small properr\' ta.\ increases vvere approved in three commu nities in growih s path. Residents of Eden raine* AluinesoUL near .^linneapolis* said ves to a S1.95 million bond to bu%* 96 icres in the .Alinnesoca River V'ailev. The% cden Praine Land Trust launched the effort. Voters in Alapleivoodt Alinncaoca. a St. Paul suburb, backed a So million bond* financed by a small properrv ta.x increase, to buy forestlands prionrized by a citizens commission. .\nd E\*ergreen» G>lorado voters a^eed to a S700.000 bond to help purchase some *^00 acres of elk- herding land. The measure, financed bv a% small mtUage increase, will match private fiindsand SI.4 million from a coun^ open space fiind. More state and local conserx'atton f inding initiatives are in the works for 1995 and 1996. Measures that did not pass this v*ear in Ulinoist Massachusetts, and York are likely to be rcsisited. Califiornia can be counted on for a new initiative. Missourians will go to the polls in 1996 to reauthorize their Parks and Soils Sales Tax. Park study groups in Uashifigton State. New Jersey, and Minnesota are likely to make new financ ing recommendations. Ci^ and coun^' ini- riatives are also brewing in Atlanta. Georgiat Charlotte-Mecklenberg County, Sorth Carolina; Cleveland. Ohio; Minneapolis, aMinnesoui; and elsewhere. Future issues of GreenSense .vill review election results and emerging jnding proposals. If \'OU are working fCt an iniciadve we missed, please ell GreenSense. (9 ifii J International Association of Fish and Ulldlile .Vgenciest Siaie MltDlift DivtMty program Funding: A 1992 Stu\*tg (June 199^). States spend $52 million a year on programs to protect endangered and non-game species, according to this recent sun*ey. State funds — such as hunting and fishing licenses, tax check-offs, and appropria tions — account for 77% of the total. National Tnwt for Historic Pmen-ation. Regional H«ritag€ Aretut; Apprwube^ ta StutainahU Development, T. Allan Comp. Ed. (199h). The growing heritage move, ment incorporates historic preserv’ation. open space conservation, environmental education, and outdoor recreanon in com. prehensive resource.based action plans for communin' and regional rexitaliaarion. This report provides an overview of Conserv'ing open land and choosing carefully those areas that should be developed is not contrary to economic health, but essential to it.” — I., rhumas. Dutchcsf G)unr.- Pla.Tning Dvpartmeni. New Aork — Federal lunds from endangered species. Pittman. Robertson and VV'allop. Breaux programs account for a fifth. To order, write International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 444 North Capitol St.. N.W/:. Suite 544. Washington. D C. 20001. General Accounting OIBce, FeOerat ZomA.' Lom D Actfuioitiono Involving Sonpn^'it Conservation Organizations (GAO/RCED-94-149. June 1994). .Nonprofit land consen-ation groups pro. vide assistance in a growing number of government land purchases. These pan. nerships work well, sa.vs GAO. based on its study ot 249 transactions inxolvina IS nonprofits. Established procedures on protect selection, price, and appraisals were adhered to in virtually es en- instance. Nonprofits also helped save millions of public dollars by arranging below fair mar ket sales and pnvate donations. To order, wnte General Accounting Otfice. P.O. Bo.x 6015. Gaithersburg, MD 20884.6015. heritage areas and profiles several leading e.\amples. The National Coab'tion for Heritage Areas is promoting a national program, currently being considered in Congress, for planning, designating, and managing heritage areas. To order, s'Tite the National Trust for Historic Preservation. 1785 Massachuseas .Ave.. N.W'., Washington, D.C. 20036. Land Trust Alliance, Eeonomie Benefits <it Lan^ProteetioH (April 1994). This report reprints useful articles on the eco. nomic benefits of agricultural and forest, land conserv'ation. Several discuss methods to help residents and planners anaU'ze the comparable costs and bene, fits of development and conservation. This publication is one of LTA's InfoPak Series on topics of importance to land conservation. To order, send S20 plus S4 postage to Land Trust .Alliance. 1519 F St., N.W, Suite 501. Washington. D.C. 20004. • r 1 ■1mg.'i * ’4 ■^s ‘-m1 -“.^4 ! •■ f \ i 1 ► ;| i| i ''^i1S 1 ro ■'H se- f •ill :VV. f ■••g nbiicfl BULLETIN m '•ii ;a •JSv:;: •'•-‘V4 q4 November 9.1994 TO: AMM Qty Officials eieii^Execudve Director VACANCIES: 11CHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TACX BOARD OF DIRECTORS: LEGISLATIVE CONTACT SYSTEM: URBAN STRATEGIES TASK FORCE DRAFT REPORT. NOMINATIONS WANTED FOR THE TAC: The AKM has eight suburban appointees to the Technical Advisoiy Cbim indivUuals who serve must be dty staff members at the Department Level, i-^City Engineer, Director of Planning, Director of Community Development, Director of Pul^ Works, etc. The im^ ftmclkNi of Ihc TAC b to provi^ technical aadstance and advice to the Transportalion ^ reglonai transportalion planning P*[®i**"*»Th, TAC IS a vety inqionant vehicle for city officials to get ueirnews h^ m reg^ The TAC meets monthly at m offices of the Metropolitan Council. Hiis is a two year term commencinff January of 1995 and ending December of 1996. ACTION REQUESTED: r**? ^_i^***** submit nominations. The nominations should te in writing and received in the AMM Office by no later than 30,1994. While most incumbents membera will be toUdMfhNBaniMrttorikenifaa. ""■»» NOMmATIONS WANTED TOR THE AMM BOARD: ^ is 1 vicMcy 00 die Bond efliKtive Jimiify 1995. Hie peisoa selected » HU dus wiB serve die bHsnce of U* lem (five monite) Slid will lie ciipWe to re<lecOoii It die Mty 1995 Aiuiuil Meeting. Tlie AMM Bond is miMgeiiiem of ibe AMM stiff, ippiovil of the at iiniuil duet schedule, esisbliihnient Advisory ............................. ■ .. . t. ■■■ ---------------------------------------------- i. ■ V-\ ,J- -* .t* /1 Board (TAB) and Technical Advisoiy Committee (TAC). The the aeeoad Tluraday of each month at 7:00 P.M. ird meets Nomioations are solicited from all pans of the metro area. To help maintain iMlance on the Board, nominadons are eq)ecially encouraged from cities under 10.( ACTION REQUESTED: This is a request for dtici to submit nominations. The nominations should ho in writinf, including a brief rcaume of the nominee^ and should be sent to the attention of Vein Peterson. Nominations must be received by no later than Wednesday* November 30^ 1994. URBAN STRATEGIES TASK FORCE REPORT: Enclosed is a copy oi the AMM Urban Strasegies Task Force Draft Report on Urban Revitalization as presented to the AMM membership at die Novendier 3rd. Policy Ado^on Meeting. This report b prcUminary at this point in time and does not yet contain the LegUative Action Section. The Task Force would appreciate input and comment on this preliminary draft from member cities prior to adopting a final report in early January 1995. The Task Force will meet in December to finalize the report contents and develop a Legislative recommendation Section. The AMM Board of Directors will review and give final approval to this report and recommendations at its January 12, 1994 Board Meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Please review the enclosed report and fSorward your comments and recommendations relative to the report to Cheryl Budewitz in the AMM Office by mail or Fax (490-0072). Your input must be received in the office by no later than Tuesday, November 29,1994. LEGISLATIVE CONTACT PROGRAM FOR 1995: The Legislative Contact Program begun several years ago, has been quite successful. In short, the contact system is one way to get member city officials direedy involved in the AMM*s lobbying effort on behalf of its member cities. The essence of die program is that local officials contact local legislators on key city issues both before and during the legislative session. The first step in the process is for each member dty to designate a Legislative Contact Person, or to confirm that your 1994 contact person again will serve in that capacity. 1 «'■ ■ r- ■■ - v,‘ I ‘i ► ► f* “ r--^-4 ' 'f, '•<.' p:j S'.;''' I'k?0 ■ V Jm m vi m protiim U vh»l te tte AMM’s legbUtive effom on betalf I, la, bee# Jemoiiimied ite penooil coBiKt betweeo city officMU ikdT kciilaHn does Kt letalis. We mge you » five U» natw iimnedUie (Amcbed is i desctipdoii of ■*■' “• Le^slative Contact). »I • M • [and lesptmsibilitics a ACTION REQUESTED: Chtnl Budcwila fkiMB the AMM alafr wtti be contncting dCy MMttieri /AdMluiitfitoci to coBlIri Legiilitlva CootacU to the near IMwc. Howtfir,i>ewoddappfedaltRlfyottwwildcnBty tCbe^ln tbe AMM Office (4f0-3301) aa aooa at you know wbo your LegblaUve Contact win be tor tbe 1995 DISTRIBUTION NOTE; Thia hu been mailed to Mayors and Managen/Adnunistraton only. We ask that it be copied and distributed to Qty Councilmeniben also. Thank you. . AST *______ Jl........... j 1 a j 1 f J .! ►r f I I 4} I-. ' .. I i V^-| ii i I '"/i; L-< r‘* » ^v' ’ i; ! 1n t How THE AMM LEGISLATIVE CONTACT SYSTEM WORKS I I »SyilBm fbr two prinuny reasons: (1) to keep ^ ^ A A _____■______11* AMM Boaid developed tl* lAfWaiivc AMM memben Involved in the Icffaladve piocere «d (^^l^ve--Tt A dty ejected ofBcUl or suff member If dwaen by each munldpilliy 10 reive ai a leglsluive ^ __-- —«- ^ * > ■ ■ >1 flire AMM. tfHiZi o3K*0»Me« l«»eoi te AMM. tt« .•Ml,! tThe Ixtiiltlivt Coma Penom Help lo mm iepni«m «wiu, ffMiaieilniiiyeeMmiwiiidwmMtaMlwi <*»!«> II* **‘*y^**^^****f^^___n—iiuji inmiiiyoccuis over tt*teleiiliooe» but the AMM cncouines one %« I ^ « I I »CL f ^pfigM the AMM*f conoeinf. As AjHHOttfiate. the Comact Fefsofts should suff of progress and legifllalor coo nil - n *■ coundi on Priority Policies and toUcits official endoisemenis; the liaison then updates the AMM on of the ddes and the leglalattHs.• i -1 *-• 'i* • » Tl* responsibilities of the Conuct Person are not tiroe-cofwiming. However, the work of the ait invaluable ~ they are carendal to an effective AMM lobbying effort. widi your l^lslaiois if an emeigency staiatloo arises and you are unavailable. Building a rapport with kgidtton Is mainUIttUatmimidttttnuatt. »ying efforts. Ofrrel^ertMMo" * \ri^ ! s ■; i« :■% •1 II'{■■ ■* '4 iS; ■rsase^- J Urban Strategies Task F orce &swmM. irfSSPi IS|i®^fwm ill R erort <t ON tBKVf..; ::a 9U5ete«(«^^ atsssrxr.i KB A nR E VtTA±lEmQNz ttJSSf vaa^itttt^MVMKUr* »W» ir w« « MS • Tf3 «S Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 3490 Lexington Avenue North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55126 (612) 490-3301 r PRELIMINARY DRAFT: 11/4/94 AMM URBAN STRATEGIES TASK FORCE REPORT ON URBAN REVITALIZATION ' Urban Strategies Task Force, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Copyright, 1994 r 1 a t I i i. t TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 4 • » Executive Summary.................................................................... ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................^ L SOCIAL NEEDS A. Families............................................................................... B. Community Building .............................................................. C. Diversity............................................................................. n. HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS D. Housing ............................................................................. E. Neighborhood Reinvestment di Revitalization............................17-20 m. PHYSICAL NEEDS F. Education &. Training ........................................................... GJob. ...................................................................................23-24 H. Transportation.....................................................................25-26 IV. FUNDING NEEDS I. Funding ...............................................................................27-28 /! • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. SOCIAL NEEDS A. FAMILIES Goal................................Communities should provide an environment that encourages family stability in older for its members to contribute as productive members of society. Recommendation...............Conununities should emphasize helping families, using a broad-based i^proach. B. COMMUNITY BUILDING Goal.................................Enable individuals to work with resource providers in crafting solutions to community problems and challenges. Recommendation...............Enable members of communities and neighborhoods to be active players in building a sense of community and devising solutions to community problems and challenges. C DIVERSITY Goal................................Recognize and build upon the strengths diversity brings to communities. Recommendation...............Strengthen the ability of communities to support diversity within their community. r in ; \ II. HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS D. HOUSING Q I ..........................Increase the availability of housing opportunities tffotdable to low income people throughout the region in proximity to jobs, transporution and services. Recommaidation...............Ottite > cUnuie and provide die tools wtettby a range of housing choices axe made available to people with limited resources throughout the region. E. NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT & REVITALIZATION ......................................Create neighborhoods which offer safe, healthy places to reside with services available to serve people of all ages. Recommendation..............Address neighborhood reinvestment/revitalization with a multi-faceted approach. III. PHYSICAL NEEDS F. EDUCATION & TRAINING qqqI .......................Focus educational skill development efforts to retain and develop adolescents in school and to encourage adults living in poverty to go back and complete their education. Recommendation..............Have both pubUc and private training providers make existing training relevant to emerging job and labor markets. J r G. JOBS Coal...............................Employment that pays a living wage in proximity to affordable housing should be generated through local and regional economic development efforts. Recommendation...............Support regional efforts such as the Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce and Metropolitan Council to spur development of living wage jobs H. TRANSPORTATION Coal...............................Expand existing modes and develop new modes of transportation to bridge the g^ between affordable housing, jobs, educational, me^al and other oppertunides for people in the Metropolitan area. Recommendation...............A coordinated, intermodel tnnsporudon system must be developed. IV. FUNDING NEEDS L Funding Coat...............................To be able to provide a diverse range of housing throughout the Metropolitan areas so individuals at all income levels have the opportunity to live in areas of their choice. Recommendation...............To create a Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Fund to rehabilitate bousing in deteriorating areas. INTRODUCTION r'Tn he Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) is a service and lobbying I organization representing 71 municipalities in the Minne^olis/St Paul Metropolitan area. ^ The AMM has traditionally provided a forum for recommending legislative action and positions on a wide variety of municipal topics unique to the Metropolitan area. AMM formed the Urban Strategies Task Force in 1993 to address two basic concerns: (1) the need for all cities to better understand the causes of urban blight and (2) to develop recommended strategies to address these problems in a meaningful and effective way. The task force was asked to examine long-term and short-term answers and make recommendations to the board, the Legislature and others about what can be done to deal with urban decay and troubles at the core. The task force membership includes re|»esentation from approximately 24 cities including Minneapolis and St Paul; first ring suburbs Richfield, Robbinsdale, Roseville. Columbia Heights and St Louis Parit; suburbs that have reoendy been fully developed or nearly fully developed such as Burnsville and Miruietonka; and developing suburbs like Shakopee and Maple Grove. In examining the results of the 1990 census and other surveys, legislators and other organizadons have become increasingly concerned about the troubles at the core and their impact on the region as a whole. The Legislature has debated alternative solutions to these problems in the last two sessions. In 1993, the AMM Metropolitan Issues Task Force conclud^ that government action is necessary to arrest deterioration in the Metropolitan area. In 1992, The Metropolitan Council issued the report, *Trouble at the Core,*’ and prepared a plan to address these problems in 1994. A Governor's Task Force on Metropolitan Housing Policy and the Citizens' League have also recendy conducted studies and prepared reports related to these problems. The work of the Urban Strategies Task Font was divided into three basic components; (1) basic research (2) developmen: of findings and (3) development of recommendations. The committee’s basic research iiKluded presentations by John Adams from the University of Minnesota, review of previous legislative efforts to address urban issues, a tour of central city and inner ring suburbs and discussions exploring a variety of issues. In addition, committee members have reviewed the similar efforts undertaken by the Citizens’ League, Governor’s Task Force. Mitmeapolis Chamber, Metropolitan Council and the Department of Housing and Urban Development The findings are the basis of the recormnendation which include actions to be considered by the federal, state and local governments. r One of the force’s significent findings is that the causes of urban decay are complex and no quick-fix solutions exist Accordingly, the recommendations from this task force provide a basis of on-going attention to address this complex issue. The task force realizes that the mere production of a report will not solve the problem of urban decay. Rather, mechanisms must be put in place to continually evaluate progress of the solution process and to recommend changes in strategy or emphasis. Likewise, it is recognized that a significant part of this effort must be to educate policy makers and managers in order to better equip them with the tools necessary to accomplish this important effort. Finally, the effort must be collaboradve. Federal, state, regional and local officials must work closely and cooperatively to address urban issues. The committee would like to emphasize two findings from the Citizens League ’s report on housing in the Metropolitan area. If these principles are ignored, any solutions poUcy makers craft are doomed to fail. 1. Peat experience suggests that inner-city residena who do choose to relocate when housing opportunities are made available in farther-out suburbs are likely to be those who are ’best off of the current poor residents of the central cities and older suburbs. A policy that focuses only on increasing the st^ply of low-cost suburban housing could reiftforce the same pattern of suburbanization of the better-off that has led to our present housing landscape. The difference would be that the central cities and older suburbs could even be worse off because it would be the poorest and most disadvantaged citizens who would be left in the core. 2. Housing has deeply symbolic meanings that have to do with family, identity, security, values, personal progress and social success. Policies that ignore these meanings are likely to be met with indifference. Policies that challenge these meanings are likely to be met with opposition. Policy makers must be sensitive to citizens’ views. The Task Force now presents a draft of its principles, findings and recommendations for review and comment by AMM members. The task force will review the comments from the membership before a final report is submitted to the AMM Board of Directors. ISSUE IDENTIFICATION f 1^ he task force has identified that a concentration of low income residents living in I deteriorating housing in central city and suburban neighborhoods with increasing -R or high crime rates and decreasing public and private investment is a significant problem in the Metropolitan area. EZ3 Urban Strategies Task Force Report A range of factors -- economic, social and personal — keep individu^s living in poor economic conditions. Those without basic life choices often lack the ability to improve their economic condition. They can become concentrated in areas where inadeqi^te housing and job o|^)ortunities exist and i*'sir conditions are further worsened. This condition is worsened when some exhibit behaviors detrimental to the well being of themselves, their neighborhood and the Metropolitan area in general. PRINCIPLES The Urban Strategies Task Force report is based on the following five principles; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. It is the responsibility of governments at all levels to encourage problem solving through meaningful citizen involvement and to participate in a unified effort to provide: opportunities for people to be self sufficient and to five and work in safe, viable and diverse communities; choice in affordable housing and job opportunities; and a reduction in the concentration of poverty. It is the role of government to actively support diversity within their communities. AMM agrees with the statement in the Citizen League’s Committee on Housing Policy and Metropolitan Development conclusion that "policy makers must lead the way toward a new vision of community that includes tolerance of socio-economic and racial differences." Government must maximize the efficient use of public and private funds by planning coordinated local, sub-regional and regional strategies to address issues. Barriers to reducing concentrations of poverty, and therefore deteriorating neighborhoods, have developed over time as the result of geographic and social patterns, public policy and market forces. These barriers can be social, economic, legislative, housing, racial or educational barriers. Although governments may not have intentionally created such barriers, the fact that governments have failed to address these bamers contributes to the problems seen today in areas with concentrations of poverty. Each community in the Metropolitan area should identify and address these existing barriers. Government is one actor in addressing societal problems. Individuals, families, churches, businesses, associations aixl groups of all kinds have responsibilities tc work cooperatively with government, if appropriate, to address urban societal problems. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report FINDINGS The Urban Strategies Task Force has divided its findings on urban decay into four categories: General, The Causes, The Impact and The Solutions. CenenI The Twin Gties are not unique in facing problems of urban decay; the challenge is facing most major metropolitan areas. Many resources necessary to serve low income people with special needs are concentrated in the central cities. Populations in all communities within the Metropolitan area will become more diverse. Few suburban communities have mechanisms in place to address increasing diversity. It is equally important to look at programs that prevent decay in the inner ring suburbs as in the core cities. Organized and empowered neighborhoods have developed models for successfully addressing elements of urban blight Dispersion of low income housing reduces the problem of the concentration of poverty but also creates social service delivery problems. The creation of new, dispersed low income housing only reduces concentration if there is an equivalent elimination of deteriorated housing units in the areas of concentration. There is a tendency to stereotype low income people. The term “low income** refins to many dififerent kinds of individuals Ih^g in many di^ient circumstances with a variety of needs. These people can not all be served by the same solution. Racism and prejudice can not be condoned. There can be strength in diversity, ronnunities need to know how to build on and support diversity of all lands - economic, racial age, etc. People who live in low income housing are often transit-dependent but transit systems do not adequately link these individuals to jobs in either the core cities or suburbs. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report The Causes * The causes of urban decay are complex and no single solution exists for solving the problem The social, economic and physical aspects of the problem are interrelated * Family units which arc young, poor or lacking job training or education are less likely to be able to provide the economic, physical and emotional resources for raising children. * The human and social service delivery systems are generally uncoordinated * Govenunent's lack of action to address and attempt to prevent or reduce barriers to affordable housing is a greater problem than the creation of barriers due to development pressures. * Historical development patterns, age of housing stock and market trends have led to a concentration of low income housing and neighborhood deterioration. * Current public policy and market forces favor new structures and new facilities over redevelopment of existing structures and areas. * Tax policies and financing mechanisms favor or subsidize home ownership and encourage stability in and commitment to a community. Rental property has not received similar treatment * A significant portion of the demand for low income housing is currently met by using older, market-obsolete housing located in the central cities and inner ring suburbs. * Public policy does not currenUy provide incentives or resources to remove or replace madtet-obsolete housing. The Impact * Concentrations of poverty, deteriorated housing, inadequate employment opportunities and increasing crime rates are currently found in Minneapolis and St Paul and are growing elements in the inner first ring suburbs. * Once a certain level of concentration of deteriorated housing occurs and there is a perception that an area is no longer safe, people and businesses with adequate resources tend to leave the area. Public and private disinvestment also occurs. * The most growth is occurring in newly developed areas in the suburbs. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report r Concentration of poverty and a sense of hopelessness generates increased violence and accelerates the loss of middle and upper income residents. There ait increasing demands on local governments to address human service needs not currently being met. Lack of opportunities and training limit the resources available to low income residents to increase their ability to be self-sufficient By choice or for economic reasons, more individuals are spending more or most of their lives in rental housing. Rental housing need not be viewed just as a buffer for owner-occupied, single family housing, but as a housing alternative where occupants are encouraged to value, take pride in and invest in their housing choice. The Solutions Families can provide the strong framework to enable people to become productive members of society. The future vitality of the Metropolitan area is dependent on maintaining strong, healthy and viable core cities. Since poverty will not be eliminated, the goal should be to reduce the extent of poverty and mainstream poverty stricken individuals into society. Governments and organizations can only do a certain amount to address the characteristics and ramifications of urban decay. Increasing the supply of low income housing alone will not solve the problems of poverty, human service n^s and urban decay. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report /. SOCIAL NEEDS PAGES 7-12 A. FAMILIES V : t ‘ ! COAL Communities should provide an environment that encourages family stability in order for its members to contribute as productive members of society. RECOMMENDATION ommunilies should emphasize helping families. TTiey should take a broad-ba^ approach ■ that not only addresses the housing and resources needed to provide for famihes physical needs, but one that encourages government to partner with relipous, educational, non-profit institutions and community volunteers to help individuals participate fully in society. ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENT * Address workplace issues such as family leave policies, day care, etc. that encourage family stability. * Reform welfare laws so those receiving public assistance can return to work without losing health or day care benefits. * Reform welfare laws to encourage fiunilies to stay together to raise their children. * Educate youth on the economic problems of single parenting. * Allocate resources to support the **assessment center” approach to service delivery, where a fiunily advocate coordinates services to fiunilies and where a nunter of service provklers are co-k)cated in one setting. The famOy should be targeted as the primary unit for service delivery, rather than focusing on the agency delivering the service. * Develop and promote a statewide, educational program for students and adults on settling conflicts without violence. Urban Strategies Task Force Report ROLE OF REGIONAL AGENCIES • COUNTIES, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL * Urge consolidation and streamlining of service delivery and benefits in cofiimunities/counties. * Support and actively participate in establishing human service councils that coordinate the work of several communities and agencies in addressing issues and service delivery problems. Counties, through human service councils or other existing agencies, should identify at-risk families or persons in need of job training or education. Programs should be developed «Mch close gaps in existing “welfare** benefits to help provide stable homes fw raising children. ROLE OF CrnES/COMMUNTITES * Make services and resources accessible at the neighborhood level. * Use existing neighborhood-based groups to encourage informal problem solving and face- to-face working relationships in addressing issues. Although groups such as Neighborhood Watch or block clubs tend to develop around crime and safety-related issues, they can take on expanded roles in community problem solving. * Develop neighborhood resource centers where residents can gather, access resources, receive counseling or get help with specific needs. Resource centers can be organized in religious institutions, community centers, storefronts or other location which works best for a neighborhood. * Incorporate public safety concerns into community development efforts, with emphasis on coirununiiy policing or “Safe City ” strategies. These strategies should be holistic and neighborlKM^-based which include residents, schools and organizations working in partnership with local governments to reduce crime. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report 8 B. COMMUNITY BUILDING GOAL Enable individuals to work with resource providers in crafting solutions to community problems and challenges. RECOMMENDATION liable members of commun md neighborhoods to be active players in building a sense of community and devising solutions to community problems and challenges. ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENT Provide resources to develop and disseminate descriptions of model community assets and models of successful community-building processes. HOLE OF REGIONAL AGENCIES • COUNTIES, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Identify and promote model community assets and community-building processes found in the healthy communities. Provide forums for exploring community-building processes and the exchange of ideas, Promote the use of regional and local plannin«: tools to facilitate the community-building process. Highlight urban design practices which strengthen a sense of community. Allow community processes which enable communities to employ individual solutions and develop community-building processes which meet their needs. Reduce the maze of bureaucracy which impedes the effectiveness of local community revitalization programs that focus on community development. ROLE OF CmES/COMMUNITIES Identify community assets through a citizen participation process, a Urban Strategies Task Force Report Dctennine strengths, weaknesses and voids in existing assets and build on and strengthen thent. Address problems and solutions as “community" challenges and form partnerships with community agencies and citizens. Encourage the inclusion of community members impacted by a problem to aid in formulating solutions and facilitate cot Jiection between people at the neighborhood level Explore , jrtunides for co-location of social services within a community. Confront issues of public safety and crime prevention. Facilitate a process that enables the community to define standards to protect the interest of individual residents and the community as a whole (in areas of behavior, expectations of self-reliance, citizen involvement, etc.). Standards should also meet different lifestyle needs Qn areas of land use, housing, businesses, etc.) Build community resources and services to meet the needs of specific populations whose needs are the greatest (elderly, youth, disabled) and of diverse populations. Facilitate the implementation of a public relations program to build a community ’s image. Offer citizenship and problem solving training opportunities to members of the community. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report C. DIVERSITY GOAL Rfco^nizt Qnd build upon the strfngths diversity brings to convnunitics. RECOMMENDATION trengthen the abQity of coirrainitics to support divcisity within their conminity. “Diversity ’ can refer to racial cultural age, ability or economic divenity. ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENT • Devel(^ and disseminate diversity tiaining models that support open, diverse communities. Prov& resources to enhance diversity in communities Tailor social service delivery systems to community needs. ROLE OF REGION AL AGENCIES - COUNTIES, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Provide diversity data and trend analysis to communities Identify and promote models for integrating communities and suppo?^ 'jpen. diverse communities. Identify and dissemirtate region-wide information about the efforts communities take to strengthen or enhance diversity in their area. Provide sotial services that support diverse txipulaiions. Provide a forum for discussion and training on dealing with diversity in communities ROLE OF CmES/COMMUNITIES Recognize and build awareness of diversity that exists within each community. a Urban Strufrgks Task Force Report J Develop and implement a coordinated, comprehensive plan for dealing with and providing supp(»t for diversity within a community. Specifically: 1. Aoxpt that cit^ have a primary role in promoting awareness and acoeptanoe of racial, economic and cultural diversity. 2. Provide opportunities for diverse populations to be represented in community life. 3. Provide or promote diversity r:aining opportunities for city officials, schools, the local business commuruty. civic organizations, citizens-at-large and neighborhood groups. 4. Discourage concentration of populations living in poverty within a community. 5. Identify and reduce regulatory barriers to achieve the goal of providing a place where diverse people can live, work and do business. 6. Identify trends in housing patterns and sales and encourage real estate and rental agents to market affinnatively in order to avoid patterns of racial and economic segregation. 7. Identify and address undeilying concerns of racism. 8. Coordinate diversity efforts with other communities at the regional and sub-regional level. 9. Identify and lobby for social service delivery systems which support and can be tailored to support local needs. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report II. HOUSING & ii NEIGHBORHOOl NEEDS I S PAGES 13-20 r D. HOUSING GOAL Increase the availability of housing opportunities affordable tol f income people throughout the region in proximity to jobs, transportation and services. Public policy should recognize the need to provide decent, strfe and sanitary housing for all income levels and the responsibility to maintain and improve the housing by the occupants. Policy should also recognize the need to provide assistance in obtaining access to such housing that is functional, sturdy and attractive. RECOMMENDATION reate a climate and :'rovide the tools whereby a range of housing choices are made available to people with limited resources throughout the region. ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENT Provide a combination of incentives including property tax adjustments and financing mechanisms to build, improve and maintain affordable housing throughout the area. Promote greater city-county-regional-state cooperation and interaction in providing affordable housing by establishing sharing programs which will create new affordable housing that is balanced between rental and owner-occupied units. Assist in making economic development tools (TIF» IRBS) attractive for cities with avoidable housing strategy elements in economic development plans. ROLE OF REGIONAL AGENCIES - COUNTIES, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Establish a regional housing choice counseling service. The service should work wth all communities to locate suitable housing options for low and moderate income individuals and families. ET3 Urban Strategies Task Force Report r The Metropolitan Council should evaluate the availability of affordable housing on a sub* regional or cluster basis looking at both the cluster and regional needs. The Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) should play a more significant role in facilitating the availability of affordable housing in areas that currently have a shonage. as well as in the removal of sub-standard housing units in areas of concentrations of poverty. Many communities perceived as having higher value homes also have a substantial inventory of older less expensive homes. The Metropolitan HRA should evaluate a mechanism where it can purchase less expensive homes and make them available to qualified low income fan^s. The Metropolitan Council should work with local governments and housing interest groups to foster the efficient development of housing that reflects the unique geographic, political arxi societal conditions of suburban communities. Develop a variety of models of non-concentrated, low income housing, with an emphasis on suburban locations which include the delivery of social services and access to jobs and transportation. Develop such models through partnerships of regional housing agencies, city officials, advocates for low income residents, foundations and local housing ofHcials. The Metropolitan Council should clearly define its role to include regional planning, issue identification, data collection and dissemination, technical assistance and coordination and facilitation of sub-regional government clusters. These clusters would cooperatively set goals and participate in joint planning and problem solving activities in areas of shared concern. Sub-regions (along with the Metropolitan Council) should develop sub-regional affordable housing strategies to provide practical, affordable housing opportunities on a sub-regional basis. The Metropolitan Council should work with local governments and county housing and redevelopment authorities to facilitate the leveraging of private and public resources at all levels to implement local strategies and housing plans. Government entities which utilize public ^inds for various economic development tools such as tax increment financing and indusuial revenue bonds, should plan and implement strategies to create employment opportunities. The Metropolitan Council should assist in providing affordable housing for those to be c nployed. Urban Strategies Task Force Report r The Metropolitan Council should recommend to the State of Minnesota that Star City designation and state economic development assistance in the MetropoUtan area should go to those cities which have integrated affordable housing elements of their economic development action plans. The MetropoUtan CouncU should assist the cities in working with the state and federal governments. pubUc and private agencies, and academia and business in implementing neighborhood strategies to make city neighborhoods more attractive places to Uve and work. This should include pursuing new strategies for economic revitalization or removal of abandoned units, which makes the choice of remaining in neighborhoods amactive. The MetropoUtan Council should act as a faciUtator in solving problems, eliminating barriers and implementing strategies rather than as an enforcer, setting targets itrKl threatening retribution if targets are not met. The MetropoUtan Council should take a leadership role in identifying barriers to affordable housing and coordinate strategy planning and program implementation in an effort to eliminate or reduce barriers. The Metropolitan Council should encourage public poUcy which allocates public resoivces fairly throughout the region - aU or a portion of tax doUars collected to provide a choice in affordable housing opportunities should be reserved for implementing sub-regional affordable housing strategies. If these resources are not utilized on a sub-regional basis within a reasonable period of time, they would then revert to a regional pool. Tlic MetropoUtan Council should develop incentives for cooperation betwwn cities, counties, businesses and non-profit organizations. The CouncU should assist in identifying specific projects with achievable goals for collaboration in providing affordable housing, employment opportunities and transportation. The MetropoUtan CouncU should encourage leadership from the public and private sectors in identifying urban issues and searching for solutions. The MetropoUtan CouncU should offer a positive approach of “opting in” to a propam to create affordable housing throughout the region on a sub-regional or “cluster” basis. The MetropoUtan CouncU should offer staff assistance and technical support in this effort. A portion of any tax doUars coUected in ea..i sub-region should be reserved for plpi implementation within that sub-region. If projects do not become a reaUiy within a reasonable time frame those funds would “roll over” to the regional pool for redistribution. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report J ROLE OF CmES/COMMUNITIES * Cties aiid other regulatory agencies should be encouraged to miniinize development costs in Older to create qualified low income projects. * Housing policies should encourage the ties that enhance households’ ability to solve their own problems and build civic infrastructure for a regimal community. * Cities should encourage the creation of scattered-site, low income and affordable housing. Cities should not repeat past errors by building traditional large-scale low and moderate income housing projects which have a tendency to perpetuate the economic segregation of the poor. * Work with communities in their sub*region, with Metropolitan Council assistance, in developing a sub-regional affordable housing strategy to provide practical economic opportunities on a sub-regional basis, taking into account land use and “real estate economics.” When utilizing economic development tools such as Tax Increment Financing or Industrial Revenue Bonds to create employment opportunities, an affordable housing strategy element should also be implemented with state and regional assistance. Consider jointly entering into agreements with county housing authorities to assist in developing and implementing strategies and acting as the sub-regional levy authority to provide sub-regional wide resources to be combined with state and other irsources, in providing sub-regional, affordable housing opportunities. Urban Strategies Task Force Report E. NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT/REVITALIZATION GOAL Create neighborhoods which offer safe, healthy places to reside with services available to serve people of all ages. Cities must recognize that making neighborhoods work for children and elderly make them work better for everyone and enhances their desirability as places to live. RECOMMENDATION ddress neighborhood rcinvcstment/revitalization with a multi-£uxted approach that conskkrs the desires of neighborhood lesklents, neighborhood and surrounding land uses, size, density, transportation impacts and other relevant issues in determining action steps. ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENT * Increase the availability of affordable housing oppoituniries (both owner and rental properties). * Promote greater city*county*iegional*state cooperation and interaction in providing affordable housing. * Reduce the level of concentration of deteriorated and/or low income housing in areas of poverty within the Twin Cities. * Provide incentives for middle income fairiilies to Invest in homes in neighborhoods with concentrations of poverty. * Provide a combination of incentives and financing mechanisms to remove and replace market-obsolete, decayed housing. * Repeal the state law that requires 1:1 replacement of low income housing within the same city. * Re-examine options for tax relief for rental property owners in an effort to provide better quality affordable rental housing. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report r * Develop mechanisms to maintain affordable rental rates in the suburbs by buffering them from school tax levies which push rents too high for affordability. ROLE OF REGIONAL AGENCIES - COUNTIES, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL * Establish a regional housing choice counseling service. The service should work with all communities to locate suitable housing options for low and moderate mcome individuals and families. * Develop a variety of models for non-concentrated, low income housing. The models should etiq>hasize suburban locations which include tte delivery of social services and access to jobs and transportation. Such models should be developed through partnerships with xegional housing agencies, city officials, advocates for low income people, foundations and local housing officials. * Support a policy of scattered site, low income and affordable housing in both central cities and suburbs in order to avoid the economic segregation that has occurred in the past with large scale subsidized housing projects. ROLE OF Cmr/COMMUNITIES * City government should administer neighborhood revitalization piograms using funding from state and regional sources. L REVITALIZATION PLANNING POLICIES ^ Teighborhoods in the Twin Cities vary in terms of the amoun: of needed revitalization. Some I neighborhoods or sections of neightorhoods may be so deteriorated that only a clearance ^ and redevelopment effort is feasible. Other neighborhoods require targeted physical improvements, while still othen need a combination of physical improvement and concentrated development of both human capital and organizational resources, llie following priorities should be considered in planning any revitalization efrort: a. Redevelop neighborhoods to provide for a mix of moderate income homeowners/renters. b. Provide adequate financial assistance, homeowner education and training to ensure that residents can manage their housing. c. Design homes characteristic of the neighborhood, or create a new, enl^ancing character for the neighborhood. (See Appendix / for Lyton Place) a Urban Strategies Task Force Report r d. Ensure that redeveloped neighborhoods have convenience services Oaundromat, grocery and drug store) available. e. Ensure that redeveloped neighborhoods encourage community building by offering neighborhood focal points such as common recreation areas, meeting places or other options. f. Ensure that s^tpropriate resources and services ait available to assist residents in buMng 'he new comrianity. a. TARGET REVITALIZATION STRATEGIES • Selective RehabUitation a. Inprove the overall level of enforcement of residential property standards. b. Establish multi-year strategies for neighborhood revitalization and funding commitments to carry out the plans. c. Solve land use conflicts and other problems to enhance the quality and distinctive character of areas with moderate improvement needs. d. Support adequate maintenance where quality is sm>'ig. e. Improve management and maintenance of smaller rental properties through landlord and tenant education and enforcement of standards. f. Ensure that appropriate resources and services arc available to assist residents, including services, outreach and referral and support for neighbortiood organizing to build the new community. g. Police, schools, civic groups, social agencies and families should work together to eliminate problems of illegal and disruptive behavior which are serious obstacles to neighborhood quality. h. Make chan^*-'. to the housing supply through renovation, redeveljipment or new consmicdLa which will contribute to a population balanced in terms of income, lifestyle and housing options. i. Identify areas of incompatible land uses that detract from resid^r.aal quality in neighborhoods a.';d seek opportunities to resolve conflicts through acquisition, redevelopment and private efforts to strengthen buffers between residential and less compatible land uses. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report r j. Take advantagr of a slowing markei-demand to reduce residential density in neighborhoods where houses arc located on 25- or 40-foot lots. Deteriorated housing where residential densities are too high should be removed selectively. Use building removal to resolve land use conflicts and to provide more side-yard space or off-street residential parking where needed. k. Examine the use of down-zoning in some single-family areas currently zoned for duplex and multi-family structures to discourage the further subdivision of existing dwellings. l. Provide public financial support for the development of marketable sites where needed and where it is feasible. Also, support dcvclopment/redevelopment opportunities which exist with lot size, setback and other land uses regulations appropriate to higher-cost market potential; the services which will support such development should be provided, - Support housing that compliments the existing supply by addressing unmet needs such as higher-cost houses that meet trade-up market expectations and create more opportunities for growing families to remain in the city. — Support housing construction that will sc?''- affordability problems, particularly where the ownership structure or construction create opportunities for self-sufficiency which are not otherwise available. III. TARGET REVITALIZATION STRATEGIES • Total Redevelopment ome neighborhoods may have very large concentrations of deteriorated housing, may be adjacent to an incompatible land use or be of a housing type that is not marketable to today’s standards. The Revitalization Priorities noted in G) above should be applied in areas where total clearance is warranted, just as in neighborhoods where less massive efforts are undertaken. This approach has been used in several communities in the Twin Cities. (See Appendix I for examples) Urban Strategies Task Force Report 20 F. EDUCATION AND TRAINING A primary variable cited for the growing income gap in the United States has been the ijk level of education attainment. This has been, in part, due to the loss of well paying X JL unskilled labor jobs to technology and international competition, with even basic job holding skills or abilities substantially lacking among those in poverty. This is exacerbated by the productivity gains that technology and international competition has given those with higher levels of education. The focus of raising people’s skill level beyond poverty is not so much general education as specific job and living skills, together with business training. GOAL Focus educational and skill de\>elopment efforts to retain adolescents in school and to encourage adults living in poverty to go back and complete their education. These efforts should instruct and promote stability and independent living. RECOMMENDATION ave both public and private training providers make existing and, where needed newly I I developed training relevant to the emerging job and labor markets. Asa prevention measure, efforts should be made to retain students in general education programs, motivating them to seek additional skills training and education level necessary to get a “living wage job.” General K-12 education should provide the necessary building blocks for present and future employment opportunities. ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENT • Work with other metropolitan groups, such as the Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce and the Metropolitan Councii, in assuring that the educarional process provides the necessary skills to help students land jobs. ROLE OF REGIONAL AGENCIES - COUNTIES, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • Educate businesses of the ongoing training needs and availability pardcularly in the areas of jobs skills and diversity. • Promote implementation of AMM’s policies on Neighborhood Livability - Educational Opponunides (A7). (See Appendix H) ■II • 1 Urban Strategies Task Force Report 21 ROLE OF dTES/COMMUNITIES * Integrate and market skills programs to low income persons and to businesses needing skills improvements for its labor pool, particularly manufacturing and selected services businesses located or wanting to locate near pockets of poverty or provide jobs to such persons. * Integrate training with other social services through individually designed packages based on evaluated needs of each individual, emphasizing the responsibility of the individual to achieve success. The AMM should support a program to provide case managers or lesource coordinators for people and families who need help. It should assess individual needs, connect individuals with appropriate govemment/community organizations and programs, and provide a means of establishing self-sufficiency goals and accountability. The program could expand to include transportation to work, health care, tutors and child care. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report 22 G.JOBS f I 1 hrough employment that pays at least a living wage, persons arc able to find an avenue to I a standard of living above poverty, as have so many before them. To depend solely on JL government support will result in r. standard of living below the poverty level. There arc, however, a range of impediments that stand in the way for many in obtaining such employment. Training and transportation address some of these access issues, as does the location of expanding job opportunities. GOAL Employment that pays a living wage in proximity to affordable housing should be generated through local and regional economic development efforts. Also, the societal barriers to persons without the ability to make basic life choices to access those jobs should be reduced. RECOMMENDATION uppon regional efforts such as the Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce and Metropoliuin Council to spur development of living wage jobs and make the region competitive internationally. ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENT Make state resources available to foster economic development, job preservation and clean-up of polluted sites. (See Appendix IIIforAMAf Policy discussion) ROLE OF REGIONAL AGENCIES • COUNTIES, .METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Develop and coordinate efforts to make commercial and industrial sites in the central and uiner ring suburbs more competitive with those offered as “greenfield ” sites in the developing communities. Implement AMM’s economic development policies III-B. (See Appendix TV) Use Tax Increment Financing and other methods to clean up polluted sites (with possible Superfund reimbursement) and eliminate redevelopment authority liability in acquired sites and qualify projects on job development criteria. Urban Strategies Task Force Report ROLE OF CmES/COMMUNITIES * Focus local public safety protection and neighborhood efforts to ensure that businesses are not driven out or refuse to locate because of these issues. Also, pursue AMM policies on neighborhood livability (A7). (See Appendix II) * Facilitate consideration of property reuse to address traditional neighboHiood and wider preservation issues for jobs that employ and are paying a living wage. * Link and coordinate selected services, such as skills training, daycare and social services in planning such facilities. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report H. TRANSPORTATION GOAL Expand existing modes and develop new modes of transportation to bridge the gap between affordable housing, jobs, educational, shopping, medical and other opportunities for people in the Metropolitan area. Also, to decrease the reliance on the single passenger automobile as the major transportation provider which increases congestion and environmental problems. RECOMMENDATION A coordinated, imermodcl transportation system must be developed and funded so ZA everyone in the Metropolitan area will have reasonable access to diverse housing, jobs, ^ Ai educational, shopping, medical, social services and other opportunities throughout the area. This system should include an expanded bus system, van pooling, light rail transit, high speed bus, bicycle accommodations and reverse commuting, ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENT * State and federal funding sources should be made available to build and operate a total transportation system including highway and various transit modes. ROLE OF REGIONAL AGENCIES - COUNTIES, METROPOLITAN COUNCD^ * Regional governments and counties must be involved in planning a coordinated, intermodcl system that will adequately meet the needs of everyone in the rrgion. Much planning has already been done and should form the base upon which to build the final plan. In addition to state and federal funding, regional sources should be made available. The Metropolitan Council should take a leadership role in addressing the lack of public feansponation in areas of the region. Urban Strategies Task Force Report 25 I. FUNDING I '1 unding for the programs which address the needs of the Metropolitan area described within this report is probably the most difficult issue to deal with politically. It is generally accepted JL that additiontil money is needed to provide new housing opportunities in suburban areas and to rehabilitate and revitalize the core and inner ring. However, there are a multitude of existing statc/fcderal programs with massive funding that, if consolidated and re-directed, might provide a more effective delivery system and reduce the overall new money needs. In addition to the major area of housing, there are a number of recommended programs which help individuals locate housing, which encourage community building, provide job training, establish economic opportunities, create transit services, etc. These programs, which can help resolve deconccntration of poverty, require additional funding sources. Finally, three questions remain: (1) the type of funds (2) the source of the funds and (3) how broadly the funds should be administered. In this climate of multiple needs and finite resources, we must make choices that will provide the greatest benerii.'; the most people in order to resolve our critical problems. GOAL To be able to provide a diverse range of housing throughout the Metropolitan area so individuals at all income levels have the opportunity to live in areas of their choice including the core cities, inner ring suburbs, outer ring suburbs or ffee-standing communities. RECOMMENDATION ^ ^ o create a Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Fund to rehabilitate housing in I deteriorating areas and to facilitate the creation of low income housing opportunities in JL the developing regions. The fund should include a variety of programs such as metropolitan-wide rental assistance voucher programs, a loan guarantee fund to leverage private money for home purchase, a reinvestment/rehabilitation program for salvageable housing in deteriorating neighborhoods and a development fund to construct suburban housing for lower income persons. Urban Strategies Task Force Report ROLE OF STATE GO\T:R>nVIENT * Create a Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Fund totaling between $35-40 million per year. Preferably, funding should be derived from one or a combination of an income tax surcharge, payroll tax, deed tax, registry tax or some other non-property tax. * The fund distribution should contain three major elements; 1. A significant portion should remain or be distributed back to the sub-region in which it was collected to provide for implementation of local housing programs consistent with that sub-region’s plans for development of new affordable housing or rehabilitation of existing low income housing within the context of an overall regional plan. 2. A significant portion should be allocated on a regional needs basis to alleviate the deterioration in the most severely distressed areas. 3. A smaller portion should be allocated regionally for non-housing programs such as community development, job training, housing location assistance, social program assistance, etc. to implement deconcentration of poverty. * Designate the programs to be created and the agency to oversee the administration of the programs. The designated agency should be (Met Council? MHFA? new?). The state shot'' ,iake a thorough assessment of all existing housing assistance programs to detciifiine if there is duplication, administrative overlap and waste. Savings from program combination and streamlining should be diverted to the Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Fund. ROLE OF REGIONAL AGENCIES - COUNTIES, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL * The Metropolitan Council should produce a housing plan which identifies affordable housing needs on an area-wide basis using the criteria of income levels, transportation, jobs, support services, current land use, etc. At this step, political boundaries should not be considered. * The (?agency) should develop a streamlined process to administer the funds with the least amount of red tape and time lag. ROLE OF CITIES/COMMUNITIES * To work with the Metropolitan Council. County HRAs and the (?agency) to implement programs as appropriate within each city/clustcr/sub-region. * To work wi»h the private sector loan institutions and developers to provide a range of housing. Urban Strategics Task Force Report 28 L A-: appendix I NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT/REVTTALIZATION EXAMPLES Lyton Fork Flaee, Ssimt Faut yton Piik Place consisted of the construction of 21 new single famUy homes in the North End neighborhood of Saint Paul. TTus area was identified by the neighborhood residents who wanted the eight-block area cleared and replaced with a mix of uses. Tlie original uses consisted of single family houses which were beyond functional use and had been convened to rental duplex units. All houses were on 25-foot lots. In addition, some htmsing units were nuxed with auto-related industrial uses including a body shop and trocking facilities. Woridng with the City, the residents developed a Request For Proposals (RFP) which spKifM that the northern blocks closest to residential remain residential while the mixed lesidentul/^ustnal southern portion near the railroad become a light industrial area. The RFP also required potential developers to design housing that fit the neighborhood character with houses of similar massing and style details. Using Urban RevitaUradon Action Program (URAP) and other funding, the City acquired the properties, relocated families and improved streets and substandard soU conditions. Habitat for *umanity, providing free labor, built eight of the houses at a substantial cost savings. The tmal development cost was $4,955,000, with the Saint Paul HRA and the City providing $3,610,000 (including die URAP funds). This project created a new neighborhood that blended with its surroundings. The houses were marketed at a price range of $60,000-75,000 and varied in siae from two to four bedrooms. Purchasers’ incomes varied from $15,000-60.000. Some of the purchasers Uved in the area prior to revitaliration qualified for the homes; many of the previous residents were renters and did not qualify for home ownership and were relocated to safe, clean housing elsewhere. In the end, the City was able to remove the blighted residential and industrial conditions and revitalize the neighborhood with new construction. This project affect^ a large arw (eight blocks) and was able to provide momentum and enhance the surrounding community. Although the light industrial area has not yet been developed, the housing area has been successful. A house purchased for $62,000 three years ago recently sold at $82,000. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report r SheJBfkU Stigkkorkcod MtSevtIofmeut • ColmmNa Hfighta rr^ he Oly of Cotimbia Heights Uundenakinf the itdevelopment of a 14-block irea which I rw.i,ww lOTie 4S0 tmits ofduplei and imihi-faniUy unit constniciion. Developed in the X 1930s, die neighbofhootrs high density and concenffation of rental units were having negative effects. The Qty examined a variety of options for the neighborhood, including cleannce of ooe block of 20 duplexes, convening some duplexes to sin^ fei^y and exaimning potendai convcnioiiof some muhi-femily buiWinp to elderly/owneiship opiaoos. The Qiy is cunently considering several proposals for the block of duplexes being cleared. The duplex boOdinp will be moved md re-used for housing in other coinmunities. The proposals must use the l«id for single fanaly detached housing, with about 20 houses, or half the previous density suggesied. As whh dK Sant Paul exanvle, this project requied that an aiea be deared which would have enough of an iiBM m levittliK the neighborhood. 11k Sheffield hfeighbochood Redevelopment effort however, ecludes several optioM which deal with a variety of high density buildings. Thit plan win letan the lesalenifel knl use, akhou^ the block being cleared win have a reduction in densky of qjpfoximiiely SO peroem. ma^^AirpoH rr^ heiwwRwdTowi^RkhAciesneighboihoodsofRichficklareinmwIiaielyadjaccmtothe I Mkne^iolii/St Paul International Akpoct These neighborhoods ejqierienoe significant noise X ftom akpon operKXNis. At the same tkne, {dans for possiUe expanskm of the akpoit frequently ftf iw>t|hhnrimQdi ki future \eari. As a result, significafic and evident tn watag. Ridifield, working wkh the Metropolitan Akpofts OMiinsskm (MAQ and the Federal Avittkm Adnfoistration (FAA), began a process of property acquisition to pemfe this reskkntial area to be converted to akport-oon^atible uses would be adjacent to the akpoTL Approx imately 400 residential properties and otk church are included wklan the area. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report ’Jfir APPENDIX It tfH AMM NEIGHBOUHOOD LIVABILirV POLICY a Urban Strategies Task Force Report r APPENDIX III ms AMM rOLLVTEO ^iTES POUCY a Urban Strategies Task Force Report r APPENDIX IV Uf$ AMM ECONOMIC DEVELOTMENT POLICY a Urban Strategies Task Force Report f I r •ife * APPENDIX V URBAN STRATEGIES TASK FORCE ROSTER fbOowiag Memvolitan GowcmaiKe Task Force nKmbm actively pankipated in the ae^tepwem of fliis lepoft Hie Task Force coodncied about 23 meetinfs, beginninf September 1,1993 and coding October 36,1994. CHAIR dyMmitr COCHAIR MEMBERS RefHCsemative Qaif Kapp. Bnoklya M Gty Manager Do«l Raadcr. Soulli Sl Pad Adminisaraior Joy Robb. lotoMadak Mayor Sieve Sailnsy.RooeviUeCicy Manager Mark Satfar, WMie Bear Lake Manager RobcftS SlHriBopw Cowcilnicfiibtr BOniMpaon. Coon Rapids Mayor AMM STAFF Roger Menoo. Legislative AfTaiis Diiector Cheryl Bodewila. Commankations A Reseaich Diiector a Urban Strategies Task Force Report rnfmaimr^ it' V/. LEGISLATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS PAGE 35 r . .1^1 r i. A . . Iki r. I ll ti.1 . LEGlSLATtVE RECOMMENDATIONS Urban Strategies Task Force Report j J r LAICS MINNETCKiCA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 5QQ S. Viayzata Blvd., Suit* ISO Waytata, MN 473-7033 (AMEBDED) MEETIHG SCHEDULE HOVEMBER B DECEIffiER, 1994 ■OVEMBER Tueaday,1 Envelope Snbconnittee 4:30pa, |1€0 lorwest Bank Building Tburaday,3 S«ve the Lake Visions Subconnittee 4:30pa, |1C0 Borwest Bank Building Thnraday, (Day Change) 10 Eurasian tfater Milfoil Task Force 8:30ao, #K0 Horweat Bank Building Friday,11 Veteran's Day - Office Closed Saturday,12 Hater Stmcturca Connittee 7:30an, #135 Borwest Bank Building Thursday,17 Save the Lake Connittee 4:30pn, flCO Borwest Bank Building Thursday,24 Thanksgiving Day - Office Closed Friday,25 Floating Holiday - Office Closed Monday,28 Lake Use B Recreation Connittee 5:30pn, flBO Borwest Bank Building DECEMBER AMEBDIMG DECEMBER 7 SCHEDULE TO IMCLUDE PUBLIC HEARIMG Hddneaday,Adaiaiatrative Coaaittaa S:00pa« Toalca Bay City Hall Public Hearing oa Pcopoaed Ordinance to Eatabliab Planned Uaage Developaeat (PUD) Procedarea and Standarda and a Definition for Public Piero 7:00pn, Tonka Bay City Hall LMCD Board of Directorn Regular Meeting 7;30pa, Tonka Bay City Hall Monday,Cbriatnaa Holiday Observed - Office Cloned t •'* r OMMM POLICE DEFAETWmr JOIHS MXEEBSOTE CRIME ALERT EETNORR Orono Police Department today announced it has been selected to narticioate in the pilot project of a new Minnesota Crime Alert iiCIrfrIli suspects and crime trends that may affect them. ferA;sr,;ri:;:5!“-s:‘s.s sk-tsssk-:. cost effecti\e than mailing crime alerts and it will allow us to simultaneously send hundreds of faxes to suspect forging prescriptions, we can fax ® crime pharmacies. If we want to alert retailers about * . ring, we can fax an alert only to retailers. If wo want to alert the public about a missing or endangered child, we can fax everyone on the system." anticipated to go statewide in 1996. Anyone interested in applying to be on the network can call Orono Police at 473-7710. _^ STEVEN St JOAN VALEK 4720 Tonka View Lane OrcMK), MN 55364 (612) 472-6438 November 8, 1994 liCV 1 0 Mr. Ron Morse CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Ron: In view of the situation regarding the tax forfeited land (P.I.D. 407-117-23 23 0001), we continue to express with this letter our desire to acquire part of that 9-1/2 acre parcel to ^d to our existing lot lines near the wetlands area. As we have discussed, these changes in the rearrangement of the lot lines would provide us some corrective action in relation to the water control and the management of drainage throughout our yard and into the pond. Throughout or 6 years of residence here, we have experienced that immediate control is necessary to prevent any flooding or related catastrophe. For these reasons and including many others not mentioned here, we request the city (within their planning and once they have been conveyed the property) to make these changes and provide our fuinily some relief to the hardships we have experienced. We appreciate your awareness of this issue up to this point and feel if our concerns are addressed and handled properly they will not interfere with any other public use of the land, whether for park preserve or future development. Sincerely, Steven Valek Joan Valek cc:Orono City Council Orono Staff Members Orono Mayor r Ilcveirier •♦. 135-* liOV .8 Mr. Ron Moor«e. City Administrator CITY OF OROHO F.O. Box 66 Crvjstal Bay. MM 55?u! Dear Mr. Moorst, The residents of Chevy Chose Drive are writing to you due to the inferior •rendition of Ferndole Rood North between IJoyzato Blvd, and County Rood 6. Tnis road poses safety problems for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians due to Its r.orrowness and poorly maintained surface. Increased traffic, due to County Rood •? being linked to Highway has added to the deterioration of this rood. We are voncerned that someone could be seriously injured along this road. We. the residents of Chevy Chose Drive, request that upgrading and repair to Ferndale Rood North be placed at the top of the priority list for major Impro'-ements In 1995, Including widening, blke/wolk paths and turn lanes where necessary, using Municipal State Aide Funds, Please see the enclosed petition signed by concerned residents of Chevy Chase Drive. We would appreciate your prompt attention to this potentially dangerous road. rincerely. Marg Kln<r Ha\eQ and Patricia Thlelmon Chevy Chase Drive Representatives cc: John Gerhardson sout appendix I NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT/REVITALIZATION EXAMPLES Lytom PmHt Flaet, SsiHt Faui yton Pifk Place consisted of the construction of 21 new single family homes in the North End neighborhood of Saint Paul. This area was identified by the neighborhood residents who wanted the eight-block area cleared and replaced with a mix of uses. The original uses consisted of single family houses which were beyond functional use and had been converted to rental duplex units. All houses were on 25-foot lots. In addition, some housmg unitt were mixed with auto-related industrial uses including a body shop and trucking facilities. Working with the Gty, the residents developed a Request For Proposals (RFP) which specifi^ that them blocks closest to residential remain residential while the mixed residentialAndustrial _____portion near the railroad become a light industrial area. The RFP also required potential developers to design housing that fit the neighborhood character with houses of simUar massing and style details. Using Urban Revitaliaation Action Program (URAP) and other funding, the Oty acquired the properties, relocated families and improved streets and substandard soil condition. Habitat for . .imanity, providing fiee labor, built eight of the houses at a substantial cost savings. The total development cost was $4,955,000, with the Saint Paul HRA and the City providing $3,610,000 (including the URAP funds). This project created a new neighborhood that blended with its surroundings. The houses were marketed at a price range of $60,000-75,000 and varied in siie from two to four bedrooms. Pufchasers’ incomes varied from $15,000-60,000. Some of the purchasers lived in the area prior to revitalization qualified for the homes; many of the previous residents were renters and did not qualify for home ownership and were relocated to safe, clean housing elsewhere. In the end, the City was able to remove the blighted residential and industrial conditions and revitalize the neighborhood with new construction. This project affected a large area (eight blocks) and was able to provide momentum and enhance the surrounding community. Although the light industrial area has not yet been developed, the housing area has been successful. A house purchased for $62,000 three years ago recently sold at $82,000. a Urban Strategies Task Force Report r Sheffield Seigkborko0d IMevehfmemi • CobimHa Heights rr^ Ik Oiy of Cdlimibu Heights is imdenakinf the mkvclopment of a 14-block area which I some 4S0 units of duplex and muhi-famtly unit constniction. Developed in the X 1930s. die neighborhood's high density and concentration of rental units were having negative effects. The City examined a variety of options for the neighborhood, including clearance of orre block of 20 duplexes, converting sotne duplexes to single fiMnily and examining potential • • • • I i The Qty is currently considering several proposals for the block of duplexes being cleared. The duplex boiklittgs will be moved and re-used for housing in ocher communities. Ibe proposab must use the land for single fanaly detached housing, with about 20 houses, or half the previous density suggested. As wkh dK Saint Paul exan^k. tlus project reciuired that an area be cleared which would have enough ofan met re levitalia the iKigh borliood.'Hie Sheffield Neighborhood Redevetoprnent effort.of ao RfMCt 10 icviul however. Hdudes several options whkdi deal with a variety of high densky buddings.'Dus plan win retail tiK lesUential tend use, although the block being cleared win have a reduction in densiQr of approximdy SO pereent MkIffteU-Ampert nn Ik new RjrdTowi^Rich Acres neighborhoods of Richfickl are rnnediaielyadjaceiit re the I Mineapolii/SL Paul International Aiport 'ncre iKtghborhoods experience sgnifhKia noise JL from aiport operations. At the same time, plans for possible expansioo of the aiport frequently neighhngboodt in ftmae years. As a result, significant and evileM tKighbofhooddeaeiioratioo began re occur. Richfield, worldng with the Metropolian Aipottt OmiiBSsion (MAQ aral the Federd Avireioo Adrinistration (FAAX began a process of property acquisiioo re peiiiBt this teskkntial area re be converted to aiport-oorivatible uses which would be adjacent re the airport Approximately 400 residential properties and one church ate included wilan the area. a UrbiM Strategies Task Force Report r! APPENDIX n im AMM NEIGHBORHOOD LIV ABn-TTY POLICY a Urban Strategies Task Force Report v' '-• i r APPENDIX III 1 lf95 AMM rOLLUTED LiTCS POLICY ur\Urban Strategies Task Force Report APPENDIX IV im AMM ECONOMIC DEVCLOrMENT POUCY Urban Strategies Task Force Report r V<-• * -'<1 • APPENDiX V URBAN STRATEGIES TASK FORCE ROSTER Ik IbOowaif MemipoUtan Govcnuiice Task f«n memben actively panicipated in the devdopoKtt of this fcpoti The Task conducted about 23 meetinfs. befiiuunf CHAIR . Aichfkld City Mutafcr C04»A1R Charioas Showv. BnsviUt CoyBdlnenhcr MEMBERS •« MaMfcr tsCoonctlmeflAtr loy Robk. Roboiaidak Mayor Sieve Saikoxy. Roaevilk City Manaser Maifc Sarticr. While Bear Lake Manaier mber Ciaif WaldRM. Oakdale AdmiatsoMor AMMSTAFT Vem Pcienon. Eaecutive Diiecior Itoger Menon. Legisladve Aflain Diiector Cheryl Budewila. Conmitnicatioas A Rcaearch Diiector aUrban Strategies Task Force Report J VI. LEGISLATIVE RECOMMENDA TIONS PAGE 35 i i . .AK. . ' ' . .y-JSagU'— riI LEGISLATIVE RECOMMENDATIOSS ii [n Urban Strategies Task Force Report r LAKE MINHETONK'A CONSERVATION DISTRICT 500 S. Waysata 31vd., Suxta ISO Way*ata, MN ■173-7033 (AME8DC0) HEETI8G SCHEDULE HOVEMBER E DECEMIER. 3.994 ■OVEMBER Tuesday,1 Thursday,3 Thursday,10 (Day Change) Fsxday,it Saturday,12 Thursday,17 Thursday,24 Friday,25 Monday,28 Etta^iop* Sabcoaalti^ae 4:30pa, flCO Eorwiaat Bank Bnildin^ S«v« Ih* Lak* Vinionn Subconnittaa 4:30pa, |1€0 lorwant Bank Bnildiny Enrasxan tfatnr Milfoil Tank Force 8:30ae, 1140 Hocweai Bank Building Veteran'■ Day - Office Cloned Hater Strnctarea Conoittee 7:30an, #135 Horwent Bank Bnildiag Save the Lake Connittee 4:30pa, #140 Borweat Bank Boiidin^ Thanksgiving Day - Office Closed Floating Holiday - Office Closed Lake Use 4 Recreation Connittee 5:30pn, #140 Horeest Bank Bnilding # DECEMBER AMEIDIHG DECEMBER 7 SCHEDULE TO IBCLUDE PUBLIC HEARIMG Hednesday, 7 Adainistrative Connittee 4:00pn, Tonka Bay City Hall Public Hearing on Proposed Ordinance to Establish Planned Usage Developaent (PUD) Procedures and Standards and a Definitxon for Public Piers 7;00pa, Tonka Bay City Hall LMCD Board of Directors Regular Meeting 7:30pa, Tonka Bay City Hall Monday,Christnas Holiday Observed - Office Closed i J OfWWW POLXCS PKFAKimWT JOIMS NZmSOTA dlXNI JILIW WWOW Orono Police Departoent today announced it has been selected to suspects and crime trends that may affect them. "Our goal is to produce a system that will allow us to more auickly identify suspects and speed their apprehension as well as pharmacies. If we want to alert retailers about a shoplifting ring, we can fax an alert only to retailers. If we want to alert the pxiblic about a missing or endangered child, we can fax everyone on the system." The crime Alert Network is a pilot project established during the 1994 Legislature. If successful, the Crime Alert Network is anticipated to go statewide in 1996. Anyone interested in applying to be on the network can call Orono Police at 473-7710. 2.. - . -rr r . r i STEVEN & JOAN VALEK 4720 Tonka View Lane Orono, MN 55364 (612) 472-6438 November 8, 1994 liCV 1 0 199^ Mr. Ron Morse cmr OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Ron: In view of the situation regarding the tax forfeited land (P.I.D. #07-117-23 23 0001), we continue to express with this letter our desire to acquire part of that 9-1/2 acre parcel to ^d to our existing lot lines near the wetlands area. As we have discussed, these changes in the resurangement of the lot lines would provide us some corrective action in relation to the water control and the management of drainage throughout our yard and into the pond. Throughout or 6 years of residence here, we have experienced that immediate control is necessary to prevent any flooding or related catastrophe. For these reasons and including many others not mentioned here, we request the city (within their planning and once they have been conveyed the property) to make these changes and provide our t^unily some relief to the hardships we have experienced. We appreciate your awareness of this issue up to this point and feel if our concerns are addressed and handled properly they will not interfere with any other public use of the land, whether for park preserve or f^uture development. Sincerely, Steven Valek Joan Valek cc:Orono City Council Orono Staff Members Orono Mayor r '■'M Ilcvemter -4. 139** MOV ,8 'JS9^ Hr. Ron Moorse, City Admlnistrat CITY OF OROHO s* « F.O. Eo:-: 66 Crvjstal Bay. MU 553;-! Dear Mr. Moor - » The residents of Chevy Chase Drive are writing to you due to the Inferior icndltlcn of Ferndale Road North betvjeen Uayzata Blvd. and County Road 6. This road poses safety proDlems for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians due tc its r.arrowness ai'ul poorly maintained surface. Increased traffic, due to County Road 0 being linked to Highway has added to the deterioration of this road. We are concerned that someone could be seriously injured along this road. We. the residents of Chevy Chase Drive, request that upgrading and repair to Ferndale Road North be placed at the top of the priority list for major impro'.wients in 1995, including widening, bike/walk paths and turn lanes w.here necessary, using Municipal State Aide Funds. Please see the enclosed petition signed by concerned residents of Chevy Chase Drive. We would appreciate your prompt attention to this potentially dangeroi® road. Sincerely, Mary Klne r XocCq n^ieQ'VYlC<rr\ and Patricia Thlelman Che”'/y Chase Drive Representatives cc: John Gerhardson TJE THE PESIDEMTS OF CHEVY CHASE DRIVE, REQUEST IMPHOVEMEMTS TO FEHIIDA^ HoId INCLUDING WIDENING. BIKE/UALK PATHS AND TURN LKNES WHERE NECESSARY: ~ , V, <Jy\ T^^TZJL ^ street H // 1 /C 'y) C IQ- A"^TF> /^ <y > il! ii,{j^. ^ \ i 4 —' . / /; Phone 5:r^ s~4 7 6^ -49//T) ^3 io\^>i joir^-r„, ^ /if-sv ir j£uc<4tc //M/;t^/» <.-;-,c l<fii 'XJ-.. Ay' / ZT■■■ (U W.4-/’ '^k.Mcu ■ s»^€/^ >/7d'-CS-/f -.s-'-; Y.'^^ '."Y;> ^t-v- ^ //4-Ch ‘t'JF-i.y'J-12 //^'. JK ^^ ,A‘> rLA. ^I(ir /I(I y..^-ffC I>V ft7J7h■' Ui p/ 1 %wr> r^g\ju\xcu<^_____ V/ 4 /-, Uy[ \ci7Ii>l// // nj^nii. /Mh& ‘■ikhl''il- I'^luQ'C- <f^v7l..v8t'g- ‘^/V- 16li)l ^ r\tf f< UUPu-^ii l?yi ^ /^f ("Aciurr^yM a- ^/rCB }0-l 3C 1^4 LOxZ^' rCL y:. ^Av ^ lc>6 CAiLu A • __ Vi 'l_________ l4^ 0 /u>u3i L-judJ^ t76* TZ; h' /6c /vy_______ / ^/3c/<f a yt-^iSgvo )7i ■ loh'^l'i'^ J/AiArzL2 I'd n yyii^-di h U (liLL^ii^,PU^.£,. -^7 s -£ ?^-y <-/ '^ ■:? -(^‘■' ri (:42 'I gy-vA/*s ^-AM “St ^ /1$/ C / f h<t^ ~0/s~^— /■■si"‘.i Ckoytx dr. ^fTJsJlAiJ JO-y " ^I2djz^l^3 wv CWloaCJUxtf -1 /.P7 (^ /</4 f - ^ ■ ^*J "Oj ^ ^ ^ ^ *' ____________^ /6/? -UsL^Cli^ (t 3T laAnil) . ._ '^AAuJy 4tB-lZZO ^ ^7^ J^'TSA An'S “?'7 7? r -• Ti*. BRUCE B DAYTON Hovember 11, 1994 NOV 1 ;4 4894 Mr. Michael Gaffan Planning and Zoning Adninisbrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Dear Mike: Unfortunately, our plan to initiate Orono*s largest wetland enhancement has hit a snag. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requires a permit before dredging can begin. They had suggested that this requirement could be fulfilled by work- ing with th© U#Se Pish and Wildlife Servicef thereby utilizing their nationwide permit. The U.S.F.W.s. has not agreed to support the plan in its current form; and, consequently, we have no permit and will not be able to start this fall. Everyone to whom we showed the plan seemed to approve it, and hence I still hope it will be possible to proceed at a later date. We shall be exploring all our options. You were great to inspect the site, and I am grateful for your help and support. Hopefully we'll be back again at a later date. With best regards. Sincerely, cc: Mark Gronberg William Niccuro r t'"- i i 1 I • IIcverTiter 4, 139-^ liOV 8 J9W Mr*. Ron Moone, City Administrator CITY OF OROHO F.O. Bo:-: 66 Crvjstal Bay. mi 553:T Lesr- Mr. Moorsa, The residents of Chevy Chase Drive are writing to you due to the lnf«*lor rendition of Ferndale Road North between UJayrata Blvd. and County Road 6. Tnis road poses safety problems for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians due to its narrowness and poorly maintained surface. Increased traffic, due to County Road 0 Delng linked to Highway •494. has added to the deterioration of this road. We are concerned that someone could be seriously injured along this road. We. the residents of Chevy Chase Drive, request that upgrading and repair to Ferndale Road North be placed at the top of the priority list for major Impro'.'ements in 1995, Including widening, bike/walk paths and turn'lanes where necessary, using Municipal Sta» Aide Funds. Please see the enclosed petition signed by concerned residents of Chevy Chase Drive. We would appreciate your prompt attention to this potentially dangerous road, rincerely, rMary KM and Patricia Thlelman Che'/y Chase Drive Representatives cc: John Gerhardson , .... I. -ii /r . ^ ^ 2 ..k. ^J r UJE. THE RESIDEMTS OF CHEVY CHASE DRIVE. REQUEST inPROTEnEMTS TO FERMDALE ROAR NORTH INCLUDING UIIDENING. BIKE/UALK PATHS AND TURN LANES WHERE NECESSARY: Date 4^ .<r—7/ / ^ ^ Street Huniber 'hJTi ni gJau/ Phone /o I(Xi3L:3^_________-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------^------------------------ to\^^ ^ /ilvv C^illllp cr j7a.6att V 7o' ■ frlvc^ (<|Y >T7x ■ CJ 'a.\£a^^ /.2Jl Q/)t>v ^3 )4^ r//r/ (I'l^ou r2c> ChQ^ V;^5^ ^ ?// JtA?^A±L (/^ /7^ __' /<^f CJzdMiA Chitlin//• yc/ /<^f CA lVI a Chtyli^ ilUiz.£^Ll^ ^iLJiUi^f A:Tr-( ^.v^fiv (? V cUv/K. Ui !ju 0*2 p/^ . C-t\x.^yCix.<\ /£p \ i M. ' C 4 /i& -r C /^; j c ■ / . \ // 7^~ -V/// ? ^ C-Ai^L C/ {~r }j I Ih ^r(' -^rCf- /f^z. !kl£hJ^ \bm^ !^'~! 3 c /y»/ /<«' /io //V /Oo • ‘^~/tf'^ SV 57^ //T 4-'n-mQ2. I4^ Olxx u^ClkJk^i 9 /V ~?76> ///-■ iH,^yPU^-.£t /V / j- -4/** ri l^/3c/<^a ~>7i. ^/// loh^h'^ 'MA\At7u LiJ ^Cii^ /Si Cicjz.^ i^h<t^ A uLa A —" L^b Cjb\Lu<i Oiut/tj- d('. ~ ^ jZJ /o^T * ^ ^ /o '^/ #'r-C»<Y'^ -CO UL/^'AM W\ C^^Q jOUCJ m - 7 c^ /P7 CJi/cn^ ^AjLijiDf^ U-7^''lZZO K-02- /</4 a^ii. '^^S/ //5 <• ^ • ^7 3 ~?^'7 7 TIL^cLet^ (‘iw.V.V- j^vgy^- ^17^ " U'1 k . ^fiiL A-C>-■ I..* .......... w.. ..‘. ^ ..■•«•■ BRUCE B DAYTON November 11, 1994 filOV 1:4 4894 Hr. Hichael Gaffan Asst. Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box €6 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Dear Hike: Unfortunately, our plan to initiate Orono*s largest wetland enhancement has hit a snag. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requires a permit before dredging can begin. They had suggested that this requirement could be fulfilled by work ing with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, thereby utilizing their ’nationwide permit. The U.S.F.W.S. has not agreed to support the plan in its current form; and, consequently, we have no permit and will not be able to start this fall. Everyone to whom we showed the plan seemed to approve it, and hence I still hope it will be possible to proceed at a later date. We shall be exploring all our options. You were g-eat to inspect the site, and I am grateful for yrir help and support. Hopefully we*11 be back ^gain at a later date. With best regards. Sincerely, cc: Mark Gronberg William Niccum 60 flOLhi . . . --fc-n 1, ....£3T.- - MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT OPEN HOUSE ts, !f94 6:00 fum. ryyoc ^mjoaOo StufmrmJ -•ft 6tt Om*£i% 0«(* i«ia jov 10 join M /m X M* i^MM**** «ft art M^tAata iCa opo"!of »f atM Mar ajI^W.^ 1^300 ^Wau^xaia ^ouLufaxd 6lJ ^urtCvt (Oait G.uttt\ OVa^xaia, a^Ptiwuioia 553^1 ^IxAix. eoE (6fi) 47^ "7970 fox Jixtoiionx ox moxt infoxmalion altout t^t g4ffa naX flXa ^x x ti ^T^l^aioxtlx^ 2^ls£x/ei. L -LL.___J imm :V"fA C&jo,’ t i.;rf » :. ■■■:'• TYPICAL LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: BAYSIDE HILLS CITY OF ORONO, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ^ S’ f /-/ LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS |«VQtcr tt» 3MM fluatni OM KMitorr Im IkM tUfm flMf. Sail OoMltf 9. CiMtr III DPVPlniiPr IIM Catl MPf/aU il*4 Htf/AU. ni P9m»x I fef: Lo* Cevapy. In 7WI I3r^ Apr AMT Iktrl* IrcMklr* MO AvrAMT I •»fk. m ‘ llPtePlpliM: Hints I » tlv oHIcp ol thp Cawlir > OMtIot C. PAIintS CBfr«. Accorltmi I ol morl lA tlw olllcp ol thi ' CoAOtV. RlMIPMlA lotol Jtm • U.JI llroi toi I t.m ten *ol 7 f>Acn lolAl try bulUablr «rm lot Lot t t.m hfn • nt 7 t.SI Acrr« A«OP*«P IPV iMlIlWlle <KMI loll t.fO tePo« Tflooorofitlcol InlamilloA proviOrc by ilptclniirr All dUlAOir^ arr ariyrniimfr Mit.-rrl In llnal -uirY-'y tenistpr M#tp (*l IUt«l prriMrM b* v lAji I an j ihily prnl ’.aiHl W««>ynr unOrr tlx* lain ot Ihr P Vfilrtemr. I1<i4 tayan^A Pra«A NIaa Any In htA? C:- :-Yii