Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-24-1994 Council Packet»LV. ■. OCT ? 4 1994 olfofmm ArENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, OCTOBER 24,1994, 7:30 P^. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (•) Asterisk items arc considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL •1. CONSENT AGENDA approval of MINUTES •2. Regular Meeting of October 10. 1994 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) POLICE CHIEF REPORT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT #1959 James Ogland. 3345 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Resolution . . , , #1967 K-P Propertics/Robert Olson. 4645 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision Approval - #f965*^*Gustafson Design/James Lear. 2525 Dunwoody Avenue - Conditional Use IriSSJ^Navarre Congregation of Jehovah ’s Witnesses. 3655 Togo Road - Vanancc/Condir;onal il970^Sott N^hacl Wold. 3026 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution #1974 Tyler Corbin, 4685 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution #1978 Wesionka Intervention Project, 2380 Shadywood Road а. 4. 5. б. 7. 8. 9. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 10.Pay Request #1 Buffalo Bituminous CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 11.No Parking on Brown Road North - Resolution 12.Revised Sump Pump Inspection Ordinance 13.Assessment Deferral Request - Henry Skarp • Resolution 14.Part-Time Officers - Start Date and PERA Resolutions CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (•15.) LICENSES (•16.) BILLS ^•4 , - • P • -- • f. I- i :va. »-A r i a^knua fOR COUNCIL MEETING SET ffOR MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, IfM, 7:3i P.M SlONO OTUNCIL CHAMBERS, 27it KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTAXjfCCNHING ISSUES AND EVENTS1(V24 11/07 11/08 11/09 11/09 11/11 11/14 11/16 11/21 11/24 11/25 11/78 11/29 Council uiBCtuit 7:30 p.in. IMit CoBRiiMioo 7:15 p.m> Day - No public meetinfs between 6 & 8:00 p.m ClHNfaniBf BomO meetiiis 4:00 p.m. CMcal Woik Scsskm (sqjoc/sewer) 4:30-5:30 p.m. HOtlDAY - Vmefaii ’s Day Observed r'.iMt.rii meettaf 7:30 p.m. Htgbway 12 Policy Committee meeting 5:30 p.m. ptaaning Commisston 7:00 p m. HOLIDAY - Thanksgiving Day HOLIDAY Office Closed C juoc U meeting 7:30 p.m. Tnidi In Taaatioo Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. m -n ^f * .r- r y.. CXL OATt PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELON FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. (plM«« print)MS OS MQMSSS ) . COONCXL Cl LOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS PMSniT POP <£roai mgmndm) Kxm OK mnaiK 1 1 • •s• W •mm Km 4 na 13.14.OM = g m -- Xo O tort t8 r »>JO > '< m V i P mmn n n" D r* 2 o 6 < ^# t Si m V!3 l?9 S’; i i C/t5!1 ps £ I'Q H 1 s8 5 S?' -S y? ? 00 H oo 3|t » ~ H > •<O 5oo 5n P 'O oo -i 3 ^ ^ r* I— so NO VO*-J ^4oo U o ■•fc *t3 VO ^ =«t <1: <1. ^ H CO •T?r» (/s n is J* ao ^a. n 2£ 2 n PO f* < (u 2 E*sa VO Ov <yi >o Ov '*4 VO >4> X < 3 oc tr poa CAo c o 'T' SJ 3 *T3 3 o lA No 7. n O M Sr *T3 "X3 7* s-> O JJQ_ 5 3 ___5J n no 9 R2 “TJrIo *^5 no n 8 9 5-® ^ o oo COm Orr n r s I ^r» 3 5 i. (% C/) CO 2 P 2 ^ S SJ s 9 & ?&§ fi >rs cr=•.0 6!O fl °l n o 18 3 93 r i K 1oaoNOcmr cmiNca MECTiNc MiNvns ronocroK* It. I9M ..JiiULKEEnfcfi OCT ■’ * arm n»c c ci Ml on the ^bcM« dMc with the Ibiowing incnlwrs present; MayorEdwwd Jr., Council Minthm J. DiaonGodten. Gahfid labbour. and JoEllcn Hurr Representing StaiTwere Cny Admmntraior. Ron Moone; nay. Tom Bmtt, Building and Zoning AdnwMralor. Jcaime hUhudh, Jiaimm riif¥f~g md tom% Adminiitntor, hfichad GaflNm, PuNic Works Director. JolmOerlMd^an. City Ci^n. Cjenn Cook; and Recorder. Sherry Frost Mayor caRed the meeting to order at 7 30 p m CnyAi (•it) CONSENT AGENDA liame 2 Md 20 were removed from the Consent Agenda. Item 6.1.13.14, and I added. Hmr moMd, Jdbboui Mcooded. to approve the Consent Agenda as amend Ayes4. NaysO APPROVAL OF MINirrCS |«2J REGULAR MEETWC OF SEPTEMBER 2d. 19H Hurr rci|uesied that the minules under Item #4, McKinney, note the attendance and oonunems of the neighbors Hurr moved. Jabhour seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Rcguld City Council Meetii« of September 26, 1904, as amended Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION C I v:k’> apprfCr ia ted fh> fppmtrsi by the CouncM of the improvemcits at French Creek Picscfve. Wilson noted the letters ofappredalioo being sem to park contributors. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Clarks Nolmi, Jr., was present at the meeting but had no comrnems at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no pc mentsattlttstime POIJCE CHIEF REPORT The Police Chief attends the City CounciTs second meeting of the month. incsoFnc juutoaGNOcmr coiMcm. HNC AMMiasnuTors K mifSILVEN E, WOrrJES/MAIWO M. WWTJIS* JW9 WATIWOWN MM. IWAL sraaivisiON • nmurfiOM n«ra »«t2l. Rooblioa i347S as propoa ri Ay« 4, Naurs 0. fPil iiaiR IttMA MCKINWEY, 35*» UVWCSTON AVENUE - STATUS tf itpoflsdwoit has been done to remedy Tba upbyG MuslriaA CM bt left outside Field bupector. Brace Site Ciorfniiad the pick-up ofitewis by Goodwill. Tbe rifi. Lyle Oman, that the lower levd was not bemg used for Mayor C 00 tba oo-going fold betwran the appbcael't dai^Ocr, The CUP ssas bauad to Zebns McKinoay. 001 bar liom at tios tioie. CalalMo reported feei»oaer tbe CUP Md staled the storage isaue was not a part of the CUP Jabbour needed to be brought to a coodusioo.II < « Attoroey. SiMh Bjofkhoal, repteaenting the oetgbbori, reported the coidhioM of the CUP to be ooa aod asked whao the sewer coooecta p^byMcKiooay Siagfo coomieoied k hod not been peid loo did ^ know wh^ Piiy CnM^dl wouki be williwi to gvt ** Md^i**y* Mayor CdWaai lefaied B^orkluod to take the omttcr up with Oly Adodnirtratioo if she tus report. iM7d Mdburth staled TiudMski is askiiig fix recoosidaratioo for a conditio^ UM pcraalAMiMoe. Trachawki has taken down the aotcmia and tower onginaOy wcatad at 37salbock. It srauld be reinstalled at 75’ The neighbors ore reported to be m agreement. Hold Harmkss sgreemente have been signed by Whitmy MacMiliM Md Greg Tradottski as well as a Coovenant-Not-To-Sue by David and Karen MacMiilaa. Jsbbour moved, Goetten #3476. Ayes 4. Nays 0. nded. to reconsider and ^tprove Item #1913, Resokitioo S-- t imS OF THE RBOULAll OnONO CITY COUNOL ICETING HELD ON OCfOOBIIO. I9M TANDM FI LimONAMT? fsmn iMsms WAfnnawFi MiAii ♦ K » ofSomcnei or OM Cfyud RcMd 2nd AddMon Md 1lMfoi«IBicd iM widM Ike Dklwy profNfty poftkn ofOld Cryiial Bay Ayc»4. NaytO. HuNnovcd.l9 Ayca 4, Niyt 0. IV seconded, to approve the final plN RcaolutkNi #3477. l-iT) il947 SAO jOIB WORUA I9SS SHOREUNE DRIVE • AMENDED VARIANCE AffUCATION - REBOUmON iMTi I j *# I ofalowiaf the storape module area. Reaohilioa #347t Ay«t4.Nayt (MiQPlfU WnXIAM ALLEN, J47S UVIN€»TON AVENUE - VARUNCES LimONiMTf5 A • Hurr • * I lacooded. to adopt Reaohi acDackaadlo Ayaa4.NayaO. #3479 approvifip side sethadt. Alleaat347S (»9|«l9fit BRUCE DAYTON/fRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC, ffifi OLD LONG LAKE ROAD-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - STATUS REPORT Mr. Bowen, rcprescflUtive for Bruce Dayton, was present This item hm been placed on the Council i^eada as a status iqalaie. r!2t, * . f : ■; : f- f '■ I : r ints »Tie wMiJuyi OWNO crnr coi»HciL ManNCHELOONOCTOBfii M. vm (i9-llMi«l962 fypeT of OU Long Like g TlieCily be piowde d froBi the Coq» of EagBifeTt. il’jp to the City CoMBol bcfcie tB peflBi idbcr of pcrnaU needed tad the ig Comnisiioii gcacfily finoied the bed ofthcpn^ Heeoledthe pnicct Hnrr 1____a I I It. ■ uthe no permit was needed ftorn the O' J Wetted Inventory but not ongoae aol apply- This land is lofiled in theNi ctecr the Ol/S or the DNR*s Bms of protected w Mwcwrf needed »Im hrmi the Cny Council, the Waiersite and perhaps, te Corpe of Etenecia. Oirrm*nnMiftherfthepoadwasdecrmedto 6.9acres. Bowcnnoted hewe shrunk and volume to be excavated is down by 20%- Hk raid indie spring. Bowen L /i ‘*1* I • ' ( I * ____^figing of wetted, h b piawied to allow time for wmmmafm__taking tvro to three years, with temporary seeding ate -Mil ipo& fromninniiig off. s was required * at MD«nB OF 11E REGUJOt ORONO CITY COUNOL ICETINGICLDONOCTQeEII 10,1904 i»m CALVAMY MEMORIAL Cm»»C«. 24» DiiNW< vAWAwci - «raoumoN V AVENUE- tiK Ihmn (12 s. Ibolige (24 of AMstd wlHfc I4S of tt prapoMd) as wen wlido r it slowed Gaflnei laid, whik the a masdinum height of ly ofothers I w < l»offr Thit property would be slowed much more on #34t0 grafltiiig a variance to Ayes 4, Nays 0. <giii«m7 K-r fmonMommo&iLWT [AKV stnMvi N, 4449 EAYSIDC ROAD- « i X. P I I >v K, . w9 j V GdflhM caplwned thit is a re(|uett to tplii olTone 2.75 acre lot with an cxistiiig rewdenot taial7 5acrep««leiicludingtheGe»epropeity The origwl plan was for live lots plus the Obon and Ccftc propertko The Plannifig Commisiioii offered the tpplcanl either Ubii« or dcadal the apphcauoii due to an incotnpicte plan The appheont rei|ucilid dctnid so the could move along to the Council Mice Mr. Olson and the buyer of let house with to doae on the property soon Mr POlcrion. the coMract purdM, noted the origiiial sax-lot plan was revised to five l^fi^nf>«i>tMiM^lni»ihieti>iepticavsiemconIWniraiiooptohlentt. TheHaoe Oudot coul. oe served with a roadway to the east throi^ the Olson property or there to a poiafoihty for a road to the west alto. Peterson's concern it with the time span for the Obotfs pir******** ag********!* dotong on or about 1 1/15/94. Peterson said the three the Plmwii^ Connnission did not agree with for a temporary variance have been modified. TheftontageooBaysideRondof 1ST was changed to 201'and rear aedmek for the exisling was changed fiom 33* to 51', now meeting the requirenicnis. The other oonditioo was a lack of a formal agieemcnt with Gdfie ^ a fond tl«ii«h hto property. A rond platting agreement has now been signed by Gcffre. CalalMi **^**t the Council members (or their comments, and if they mshed to hear the piM. Jdbbour wouM like the ngiul of the Planning Commission, but since tins was a prdiminary approval, he would agree to hear the plan. Hurr fdt if the conditions had been met mid ifstaffwat comfortable with that, she abowouldlook at it. Callahan remarked dboul the Planning Commissioo not having complete information and was hesitant to look at a plan that had been denied. Goetten said this has been done previously. It was agreed upon to look at the pimi r IbMnB OF TIE IICGUUUt CMIONO CITY OOUNnL ICETWG HELD ON OCTOBER If, IfM (il I - il967 - K-F Oto - CortiMrf) wBt for tlw GcAc propcfty to be iaduded ifOMloi C it rcpiallcd to buidiMe kils Md Ourtot B is used for ■ Oudol A a ctthMif for becofi^i pvt of the folwe pia throuiB GcAf^s property. Iflbe Apof be the Olw wiidvice vouid pc Benett t—e coBcemed mirinhf riA of coatimwey wotiin thv the City vighi not be able I 1 « • i ri|hir««v. ^hert vouM be a Path ddcired GdBoo alv» noted thv there is a 1979 ca favor of the Obon property Aowing for a road. Hwr naived to approve with the Staff focommendj If the On videdbli R on the GeAe property in There was no second to thv to return the rvpMt to the Planning C< ney on legal questions. Ayes 3. Calahaa JUhbour Nays I, tforr. t«f2>il9M KEITH A VIVIAN BANCCBT, 3Sm BAYSIHE HOAO- VAHIANCES Applicant Viviao Bai«ert, Builder Roelolls. and Ptoperty Owner Shirley Larson were GaAon reported the applicant wants to construct a driveway access into property V^^i^qnth^oflrthMdeofBiywdeRoadiBordertocoiMtiuctareiidenre. The raquest b for vvknces for lot widUi (I65* where 200 required), lot area (197 acre lot where 2 jpfn required), hardcover (f0% in 0-75’ zone), land alterations (Kve tree removal in 0-75* zone) and bkiff impact (topographic akerationVgrading and filling in 0-75* zone). I MBUTTES OF THE REGULAR OPONOCTTY COUNCIL RCEfING HELD ON OCTOBER 10,1994 (taB *12 - Baum - C««i«in I > ‘ ( I isllKbcilofliieclioioesavailiMc Noocoftkec rrc ow tlpoMpli m arc MkoilMi thit bon. TKc dcfi^ and fcb coosideTaiion should be given to akernalive t nith » neighbor Callahan ukt we can't tik the apphenM to Ciortian connnenttd tlwl by yving thb property access to aewer. the Ci^rd^^ -. nof* eaemeni from a neighbor was not l««We. One« _________« nib^ asked S30,000 for the cnscmenl The other two ^1^ property Ibr side and an easement would be a landrance to either r«* ^ noimt sbaiA in would be a better ahemative as fcr as navigalion but would MiteteAiM. Gdibm ^amd there would be huge rctaanint watts or wide Ml that aoeamio Screening would help to protect headligfal refraction. M^imef condition endd be treKherous but navigable Cook also said the present plan would cause the of duinictKNi to vcgctnkm. reported the County Engiw required the drivc^ of 9/19 dint the rcquciBcd variarrrr Am* tfi thm cntiskfarable nradinR and _______Notaiconnnented on the loss oftrees, but said ifthere were no das was the best plan. Safety was still an issue and suggested possibly heating part of the driveway Jdbbour asked ifalandifv would be appropriate. Gaflhm said ifit was feasibly makesenae fUteteffiesponded that the t% grade was not excessive and the rise ^ Vis over the IciVth of IIS'. There would also be a flat spot in the bend to allow a car to their drive. rs, but not require H.-.‘it r L incs OF 1W REOUJUI O«0NO CITY OOUNOL ftCfTINGHELDONOCTOBEXIO, I9M NoftliHre Ay«4.Nq>sO. MAVOMOVNCIL K1 ji.i: cNGOiam • *rf t. cnv AMfOUBnUTOrS ICPORT l*iU| AHOINTMEirr or IXEC110N JIJDGIS fOR GCNIJUL KLBCTKIN uirnoNiMsi tl/l/94fnaii ipprofve Reiolu Ayct 4. 0. n«34tl ’l l I..1 .1 1 n judges (•#141 BSTAlUSa RATE AND TIME fOR CANVASSING ROAMI MISTING Huff uioved, Jibbour wooded, to approve the dRe of 11^/94, St 4:00 pm, for the Asfes 4, Naiys 0.I (#1S| SUMP rVMf INSTECnON ORDINANCC #129,2ND SERIES • I I I Mooiae lepoiied dM das ioipectkw progiam b to alkw the bwpectioo of al hoines with Gly sewer 8«vioe to coafinothR the «wp punv b not directly coaoecied to die » of a sump pump to the sewer cdons. a dmchiie for Smooth surcharge for tl piBiipa itol a comphaoce with a 3/1/96 date set for oooiplianoe. The imp wil be oaducted naialy by indiome staff If k b found to be needed, additional pcnuad wR be hired to complete the mspections on time. t ' -Rv i I i • I ' Hurr (ell the (him should be charged if the sump pump b not in compliance wkhin 14 days after the inspection. I . 1 I r alrf Sirfiwdd iw«w the tiniag of the wrcliafgt iod bring a ., I » .Idbcdomto IB CO V -^M<M1 OeAwto»«><» the'^1*'^ “■*•**“ • I ♦ « * _Owi»C«yC«dt Service. «id the City’s Fee S ■ of OrdmcBoe #129, 3.20. lUieemo KeguiKioa* Mrtws to pufvwhiiy for »luB^i pump iwpectioo on<am66w» Ayes 4. Nays 0 'I ;mC/SEWCII WORK »(m>C9TARUSH DAT* AND TIME f n. *«k «-«.«■ k. »«•«*- «* ” I#t7> MWee WTERCEfT «««v*.su.9 t. ■»ve»over»twelve-yeerperiod. Aye$4.Nty*0. w ^ (••It) PA«K njWnWNC - CWfSTAL BAY PtAYGWMINO ...., lahhn.^ tft MMovetheiecomincodatiootiMl StiffMwy* Hun W»o«r TV comuH«w« be piWwBh Commune yaollocMadS2.T00 Aj«t4.N«»*0Fund money *»"»** ^'"*** — — - (••It) niENCH CREEK PRESERVE - WIUM.IFE BUND - SIGN - PICNIC TBMMTARLE HufT moved. Jdbbour seconded. *® ***2^^*^^®^ Pi«erve for an amount not to exceed $1,500 from the Pifk DeOiciiion NaysO. r MBIirilSOP THE •BOUUMICWOWOCITV COUHOL CflYATT ThtCStf M.- A)«i4.fl4n0 (••tOHUS T- NQFtO A» HwCiiyC r IJ < ci mi a^lou mwt to Ewcutivt Sniioii 9-30 p.w. Edwwtf J CililMW. If.. Miyo' ATTEST Dorollv M. H^lifi. Cky CM t* «•4 »•I* - 'f* •' ♦ '*V •*< r ‘ ^ . T«% tiim IIMayor Callahan and Orooo CouncU Ron Moooc, City Adminislfaior Michael F. Gaffron, Asststani Flaiiniiif A Zoning A4hnHiistraior October 19. 1994 #1939 OflaiKl, 3345 Ctystal Bay Road - Variance - Rc*olulloo ^ Request for for pi VL ZnaingMrkt: m. lot coverage, side yard and rear yard setback variances ‘ pfopeity. rt Residenlial. 1/2 Acte A - B - C - D • Sotke of Plvniag Commisaioo Action KVI8/94 HMdeover CaknlaiioM Siteuned by AppUctu Memo and ExUbRs of 1<V1(V9« 10/17/94 constiuSrf". *STin^»r^ paniilly cn the Dikoo R*U prepeny ,1^ .!^ SS.“2 ~ «i- In 1992 the City Impecior liw ihe^ «h«f. SSSJylJtveyed »d S^dteahedwa, not on his property. He and his neipUbor aero« HdbMe PI**- for a vacation of Hillside Place which was withdrawn alter stroog opposition by DNR to a vacation. Mr. Ogland then reqnest^l a variaia* 10 allow the shed «. ronain to to location Planning Commission noted they could not gram me a v mquesi. suggesting applicant look at other locatioos for the shed. Mr. Ogland revised his proposal, indicating he w«ld “iCT Sh.^ B Of October 10 memo). 1 f Ftk #1959 Ockto 19. 1994 PUfe 2 I > I «»' ^ s ^i0H —■■■■ M ifi|iiv^«i vt Ac fcviitid pfopoMl* ^hich uickidcs ■ -, , 5-,«, y«d ««wk viftaw aad W »k ymt variaocc » ^ a •«» ______ . lol CTVcnte »in». a 75-250 iMWtow «riaa«. Hitilcom pcr ^•ai near by 10* t.f. wbbta 0* frofcfiy bnaalinrt. Itaa ). Hafdcovo I mat. MMBinf r» •im n^i M 18* wide the fo«d coBKiiMies aoolhef 24% to the 0-75 cone. Ttieie does not nn e»ce«%« hMdeom wlwA couM 1* eesily or leasoi^ sidir r I ■ I - ! >» -1! It »I ^•d iatkNi. Given the j am tht applicaniStaff reooimnendt approval per the PUimiag Coeamisi iBSKMy of thb shed as noted in the dhibiu, staff would ** SSn a baldiii* |*ii»* for toanpioyal |*r d« llaiwa* Cooraiaiwn icsoomentolta iMfdcow and lol coveiafe variaacea » Jane* Oflaiid a 3345 Ciyaal Bay Hoad. Vseconded by . to Resohnioo #franting ck. ayes,nys •*-«g**‘................. *»-■ r A MESOLUnON GRANTING VAIIANCES TO MUNICirAL ZONING CXMW acnON SUWIVBION 14 (C, E A F), SECTION Itja, SUBDIVISION 2, AND section SUIOIVBION 14 (L) FILE NO. 1999 WHEBEAS. hn» Oitood (beiciiirflcr "the appUcanf) b the owm ^ ^ property locaicbil 5345 Cryil»l Bay Ro«lwilhio the City of Orow(b^ •«> iqplly 4ncfa >e<l a* follow: Lot 9, Wallaoe’i AAttwiioAe Village of Mi Mtneaoia (IweiiiaBer "the property*); and i ! I -n ll. t County. wimKAS. tiM> aoDlicani hat applied lo the Cky for a variance to ZoBmCO*s«b5Sk» U(E*n ».Bw ■« o«. Il« lo. ««• ^ M »^^ly loeaceed 13% ofihclotarea, andwinaocw roue of 32% wtocie only 23% hardcover c.o«.iivMinn 16 <L) to allow hardcover m the 73-230 lone oi ___ THEBEFOKC* Mil t' I FINDINGS I Thb application was revbwed as Zoning File #1959 2.The pro District peny is loc.«l iothe LR-IC Stogk F»nily Ukeshore Re«d.mi.l 7«»«f 3.October 17, 1994 and recommended approval of the upon the following findings: Page 1 of 6 V r A. ApDtiaM awttcied the City tone tine prior lo the 1991 commictk»^ .•_I_■ A........ nrmiit WM nrrriiirr for a 100 B C. F. permil was aeocssary for a sXM. TW City irriwd ttiM foUcy >w lypUciM «i» Dcfar • n ♦ tiwd cm hb property in 1992 UK cantifty 100 s. f. sim b locaicd partially within the righl-or ««y of Hillside Place and partbOy within the Dakota Rail property. The Ptaanwi Conimbrion finds M it b hcyoral the so^ of the City's ” ^ ^ «■ d« Huinifci mc« ritw-of- <ny. , , .Saries if varianen areThe shed can be locaied within the property ... ctaned to allow a "0 setback* utuaiion for the rear and left side property liaes. Snch locatloo wiU preserve an eabtini tree locased betwtM 11^ hnii^. nd wiU ftifftier maintain the recpiired 10 I I ♦ Hardcover in the 75*250' atone b 47% and wiD increase to 52% by mitigate thb increase. Hardcover in the 0-75' rone attributable to the applicant b 19%. Lot coverage by stnicniies including the shed will be 1.085 s.f. or garage. The shed is necessary for storage of applicant’s property maintenance needs. Page 2 of 6 r unfevcIoDed 23’ nthi-of'way of HiUskie Place adjacent lo the property. pfopem will be negMi>icly implied by gnminf ormc 1 me of dK ngfat-or-way. Tlie City Cowictt tat comideted ito application indudkif the findings !7a^nAZmof me Plamiiiif Committion, lepom by City staff, commeno by ilrapplicaai tad ilKcffert of tl» proposed variance on the healili, safety and wrifaie of the comnaiwty. 5.Tl« City C0««a f«b ih- *e coodi^ srTiiTsr; ^^~-^rzs:rx s^. ZofUfV Code and Compcthcmive Plan of the City CONCLUSIONS, OBDEII AND CONOmONS uBoo the ibove fuidings. llK Ofoi*. cay Counca Iwrty |fi«s a v*riia« rrs « n? . ..j »*-««>» ;zsrstst‘. s Section 10.03. Subdivision 14 (C) to all^ M and a variance to 19.1% where only 15% lot ^ /i x to jHow hardcover in the 73-250 ’ Sections 10.22. Subdivision 2 and 10J6. ^*^*''**‘^ ^ rLiuired subject to the followingof 52% where only 25% hardcover is normally required, suojeci lo litkms: %ji - Page 3 of 6 - .‘r t r I y. 4. 5. 6 7. ApplifMW «»«il Igiaaie the «hed io the wroved locaiioa is ritown on Exhibil A muebtA. Fkior 10 tfK flHd. iiTaifM* oNaia a buttling permil for tbe shed CUtf No allcr-iln-CKi fieo vitt be Rqpmed Agyitrawt k MiifMed ibn haidcom oo dn mneny eaceedubc amcantt aomaiiy ~nl bifilcovcr will Ittcety aoi• • I I ».« gfined by ibis variafice nm wWi die pcopeity o<* with the spplicaot, bn aw pcmiisivc oidy ami must be cxciciaed by igplicaiioa for a buthiifii tbe dale of Couacil agfNoval. or du dale (October 24. 1995). variance will %T| , •iilioM of dittVioladoo of or mMKConpiiance widi any of the leniis and A.II comOtm t vMMioa of Ike niiii* code, ihdl MHoouikellyicMinjai9 anhoriiy graaied herein, and shall be puaishaMe as a misdei • -> ' I I. of this lesoanion and on behalf of Immelf. his heirs. hereby agrees to the rccocdii« of tius resohition in the Cham of Trtle of the property. Page 4 of 6 : • ) ; ! i i \ ■■ j i i } i ^^ A<SopiedbyilKCii]fCouiKiloftfaeCityofOrDfio. Mimesoo at i rcfiibr IkU on the 24th day of Octoter. 19M. ATTEST • » !•ly M. Hallin, City CM Edwaid I. Callahan. Jr.. Mayor Property Owner (•) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) *• COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foicfoing imtnuent was ______1994 by Edward I. Callahan. Ir. and City of Orono. a Mimesoia nninicipil corpon of the City. ♦ t ♦ l-i It i ledged before ne on this 24th day of y M. HaUin. Mayor and City Clerfc of die and said iiHtniineni was ciccuied on behalf Notary Public Psfe 5 of 6 Mui—ir... , ...v;.......itA '4- i" ; STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )*• COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ____day of___199 befoie ine i Notify Public wi rn 10 OK 10 te'dK penoait) dncribcd in •ai who executed the foiefoinc riedged dM he (they) executed the nme is hb (their) fne ict ud deed. 1 1 'V: 1 1 ’' I NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )» COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____diyof___. 199__ before me i Notify PuNic within mdforsiidcounty.pefioaillyinKited---------------------------- . . ^ ..___ known to me to be the |icnon(s) described in ind who executed the forcfoinc insttumeni.ind acknowledied ihM he (they) executed the line IS his (their) ftce ict ind deed.: i NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On dus____day of _, 199_ befofe me i Notify Public within knoem to*mTto*be*ite *n ind who executed the instrument.ind acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed, NOTARY PUBUC Page 6 of 6 *— -«■ i:CITY r.o. bhm Cryalall^r, MN 5SJ23 473-7357 I CM .»'w' HNGF1LE il9S9 NOTICE OF PLANNING CO^ ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: October 19. 1994 TO:ImetOflaiid 3345 Cryml Bay Rood Wayaaia. MN 55391 type OF APPLICATION: Viri DATE OF MEETING 10/17/94 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Of CoiiHBiatbMi ffecoaneadi Approval aAieci lo cood foDowinf: below notes AND SPECIAL O iV|i I. Move ihed 10 Kfo-ieiback lociltoo per revised proposal 2. Provide hardcover calculMioiw for the property (received KV17/94) AoDlicird’t next tchedulfd meetini is confimicd as City Council. Monday. October 24, 1994. meeting starts at 7:30 p.m.' 1.1 - If you desire certified copies of the official Planning C from the City Ckrk afkr review and approval by the PI t'n tiHM.Li I I' f > M Sion mimiies. they are available CoonhisskNi. SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) i-TS* HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 23-500* ^11 A. H ook JZLZQCS JLaix B. Gaofe C. Drwrwy D. SiOewaSk SSL. 3»A- E. FMiofDeek/________ oief^ UodffUitt By Plaitic iL^ ti,L o.'M JT>. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total A. Hovit F. Landscape! Uadcriaia By Plastic G. Otheryi^ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ _ • A /C£>7. S’ + B J312.xlOO SQB-IOQO* -yVy.4S S.F. *%S S.F. i<fs ^Id 3*^9 57>pc Sa *yg S.F. S.F. G> S.F. S.F. S.F. :S:(® S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.(S) ^0^.¥0 S.F. A /^XO,0 S.F. B % A B « r hardcover CALCULATiaS WORKSHEET 33*f5 SITBACT^ ZONE: (CUtClXOC ; R/^KDCQVCT_B11 ©15-25V 25-SM* ^.1 MI J.vL' ► • tf' ■ \\ % I I S.F. SF S.F. S.F, B. Gant* C Pii—wy I E // S.F. S ' $.F. — D. SMrvilk E E Z£S.F, S.F. E. ranaOM^ Mtfeir % % S.F / i.//^A./V S.F F. Uadcri^ « t X S.F. S.F. S.F. O. bdKT TOTAL HABDCOVEl IN ZONE total FBOfERTY AREA IN ZONE 7/T. f¥* B « 100 - BfiBBDLHAIDI A. H [Pi ZONE S.F. wu* B. Gaiage C. Dri»cw*y D. SidewaOc £. Fatio/Dcck F. I MMHfaf* Uodntaia By PUsdc C. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ' _ __ + B .>100 S.F. S.F. % 13 7/7. /V S.F. A - S.F. B A B 7j i ■ I ■! I L*l(c Mimetonltt «F o-fj' ze>^e - r^.750 y >:1 >W#A f 7S'~^St> *««■* ' i*y) —f— ^— X' Existing Legal Descripton Lot 9, WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH. This survey shows the location of all existing buildings in relation to the boundaries of the above described property. It does not purport to show any other improvements or en­ croachments . e: Iron marker found o: Iron marker set 8 S4€0 tJf. 44. , =-^ •"■*••• vt:r ■ TO:Chtm Scteocder and Oiooo Plai»u« C Ron Moonc. Adainiiliaior 1.11 • 11 i kV! I Meabfn fIKKM:Mkhaei P. Gaffioa, Asst. PI2 n I It I i •A Zonu« Adainistnior DATE:10. 1994 SUR jCCT: #1959 Janes Ogtaad. 3345 Crystal Bay R< pUMk Hearing - Vari Conisnalion of Appikanilist nf EsIliMli A • Letter fr C • Notke of Plaaniig Commission Action 9/22/94 D • Plaii^ Coomtisstoo Minnies 9/19/94 E - Memo and Eahibiis of 9/13/94 Place rifln<of way and Dakota Rail ngln-of-way. _______th«i the shed be aikmtd up to but not over the side and rear lot lines, iweffy *« .Ikm . l-fe ^and wiDtavea W *«>«*belwccBiheho»«elodllBiliBl. Tlie aeidka« » proiwal The I Rctr yard setback variance of 5’(5’iwpiketi) 2. 3. Side yard setback variance of 10 ’ (10 ’ required) Lot coverage variance (lot coverage including or 1,500 s.f. allowed). disl.0S5 s.f. or 19.1%; 15% Hardcover in 75-250’ zone of approsimaiely 50% (25% allowed) Stsff RcCOQMMMdflllOII prior to Council review. /^f,c n-o ! File #1959 OMotar 10. I9»« p- 1 V . • i . . i ^ (or <hi itrtaBl «•»» lor Ott mav “ 2. J. IUM»— i1.vcd Table for »A * ) I A iofovi r' mMiii r r ■•----------------------- e€^ . ^ r !>■ ! 4 Scptcabcr 29, 1994 TOs MichMl Gaffron, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator, City of Orono SUBJECT Varianca, zaro sida and raar sat back, storaga shad, 3345 Crystal Bay load. Daar nichaal. WMiiMtfifwi our aaatina and discussion on Saptaabar 26, 1994, dSi^«2I thl? tS2 bH.t «,lutlon .t thl. tlM xould b. to ,Mio«t • tore lot lino *«rl«i*eo and raposltloo tho thad ontlro ly within tha boundrias of tha proparty. Hith • ..ro vorlMC. thl. coo Id b. tha shad aporoxinataly fiva faat forward and fiva faat in. This would avoid tha naad to cut down any .^*‘*** *2? sliainata tha naad for fill bacausa of tha rapid qrada drop. Tha add!tonal storaga that this shad vary much naadad. Uhila tha location is not idaal, it is workabla. Thank you for your considaration. Your assistanca on this aattar is graatly appraciatad. Sincaraly, Janas Ogland 3345 Crystal Bay Road ffayzata, Minnesota 55391 PECEtVED SEP 30 UM CflYOFOnONO JUL hka. r m ^ Surlirwton - Rs22?2.0I \lorthern 5ha:/ r 1. k-, CTTYOFORONO r.O. Wm€i Crjitti W/99 MN SSS23mynan EINGIItB #1959 TICE or PLANNING COft ACTION _ date OP NOTICE: StptwtnTl iT I V.V1 . 19H 3345 Cnnul Bqr Woad Wayan« MN 55391 type or APPLICATION; IIAim OP MEETING puMim 19^VOTE: 4 fOR 0 AGAl foUowiog TMed Aniktft 10 exploit «ptio«. PtuanfC 10 *fk ’ la its cuffH* locaiiott. ihty ml kiooaMDPiiRailpropeny aa#• » fbnabie widi allowtnf it itayiaf oa HUbidi AmikaBl b ichadalfd to oi 26 ai 11:00 a n. at tte City offices t wMi staff 10 dtscuss thb Rutter oa Mooday, Sepieinbef ccftilM copies of ite official Pboaiai Coiaatbskm «ims^ ibey are available rf appitnral by Ite Haaaiai ComaissioB.If you desire Aon Ite City Ckrk after review ' J : iMMMX r k - fc, •. ••-meeting HELD ON SCrreMBER 19.1994 (i6) licB il95) • AIca > C « * «‘i • •* fnt Dept, thu the fire safety 9tid wctcaolt&csor. Th«- <» -.1 foundi fden to lit praWcM of spm t ^ Mami4 of the deck Couacil MW no probkm with a Alka.Moof Md «qM as w Mr he« iI9JJ fee laptoMwem of t«ir imi«« to s-iAclo.y .^.^ofaSiffcooddrfbclw Aj«a.No)i»0. ^SrS^MMWUATION or niuc HEAIUNCTWO LOTS . - c-«a-- *•TI m A -r p „ ___^ McomM by Sioilh. «o uMo Ham »»5t to Uio Ociobar 17. .fdiiinMaoni**-----Ayoa4,Nay»0.It waa looved by Prteti 1994meetii r« rm. ..»» MMES W. OCUtlO.. ^ CRYCTAI. «AV IK»AD - Anta- VAMAMOt - r«»UC BEAWNG The AIBdavil of PuWicalioo and CertiBcaie of Mailing were noted. Mr OgUnd was present i I ?.-7 iHNUTES OF THE ORONO ?LA MEETINO HELD ON SETT 1 a. jCOMMtSSKm 19.19»4 (il) IM il9S9 • 0|lMd • Coolinued tfw property i«i. €• Ihf ant ypiccep of said Aed ani property. Haooied OgUnd voicod dK proUen frtdi space iimiefioo M a IOC or UBS na sncssuip theiiHd. Ha ^ s^ tirt died b oo skids and CIO be rosily mofved. need for Tbe puMb road baue ooltebea was dbeussad. Possitda fUcure repair of sawarfiM was dclciiuiiicd Mayor CdWwi coMoeiaad 00 lirt prabdifo difficulty with obiMiot a DakoU Rail Petanoo loorod. Bcff secon ded, to table item #1959 aBowiog applkaat to pfescK another opiioo shed focatkm. Ayes 4. Nays 0. (#9) HEM #l9i#-TOR JONSCNmAVARRE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, 34S9 TOGO ROAD - VARUNCE - PUBLIC HEARING The Affidavit of Publicatioo and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The applbanl was present. S i - ■F’- r •? Tm i1 »■« ». M • n 1 kv ! jxB Mcmtxfi H ob Moone, City AiteMWior ^ P. Giffi Aisntafll PbuDBuif Sl £Miio$ Man IM r u.i, 13, 1994 #1939 J<W. Ogiail. 3345 CiyUal B*y * After-^Ficl Variai ♦'ilLR.IC, Sii«le FaiBily UkeOun Rcsid rtowie »l»4 to lansiB locaied OKCtiiv the required side or mrAfkr-dK-fKt request to eltow aa p«iMy «iiM a pdbfic riglu-ofvay ptopoty line Kteks. H 'MiA IM^Ei Per 1. 2. 3. A B C D E F G H I • «. 1 -IA■ wA PItfMip propetty Owners ’ Usi I^oifUbor Acknowledtnneius Ixoer of Request PBotos Survey 34iKcflaoB0BS Cone Stair Hardcover CalcultfioBS s«i«. 10 TO, SUM. M (E * F) • »»>«<*•«»»'» sidey»cd i*iMckftomUiepropeity line. (Shed mMdle* loiluw » 19.1%) S«d« 6.07. SUM. 4 - ixc-in, « (The leim meet is synonymoui wHh the letm puWic foeu » ue SuM. 1 (L)l e«ion 10.22 Sum . 2 * Seelioo 10 56. SuM. 16 (U) - lteto»«f WniTOi®" zone in which shed to locited to at i|i|>nwiniaiely 30* haidcovet.) r ZoiH« Ftk #1959 Stimirthff 15. 1991 Appl H^.IOOsf U«l in 1»1. i»>«ed by l«* .« - p.»p.«y. y. 1992. 11# *y * jiJIuitT^ the Mcoa lUd property ■■^)- HiDaide Place » «f HUlsidr me. «■< »the Viltat* Mi-cwita public Ii»bi<r-«*y «„ii, portiaat of ihe BCipHbaibnd » leigHbor Mr. Swyke applied for a vacaikm oi CoaminioA wdhdrra llie appUcaiio® vact it locaiic^ place it wididi ilic piopeity boyadariei. oi«ially Mr. 0|lii*l’i teller of feqM« »d ^ folkmtnf Ik wiLf. WMk« i^fMiiBieni wowo a» ■ miniiWMo ie<pMfe dMt llie P*®^**^ The Public Works D^aiom rtniclure b allowed to renaiiiow« e«abe a HoM Itof^ Ap^ oo the rtfhi-<’f*«'*y There “♦ une and Se City would me fill-to move or hare d« owitor the way. Ihe City has no ^ SSStiS S3S."iS*. ~ property. A .«ii« i. «!-<«-roc bK coverage. H-dcow WM n« cilcuhied by ibe wBc*a l»* W*“.» ^ ^ in the 75-2»- looe «bi^''» ”.5!?^ ^ o-rf koliimaely WPtoved. .Ihocoo»h binic m the 0-75 ’ zone airf arouito 50% in th^5^^ oTdiedied. If tbe shed i. oUiinMly for the entire property should be required of the app I r.r r*.r i. i.-- k FUe #1959 Fife 3 1 - « * t ’R tocMwa. coata" apptkMt. •#* * I ' ^ of ■d OB CXCCIIt 1 of ioea to allow the shed to icniaiii at its omeni I of a HoM HMWIess Aftcemeni by the ftoiB Dakou Rail, and afplkani lo lubiBit 2.Pi I iimft d» A*d «* "»»• » *Mid iccommend 3. 4. 5 shed removed. Tabk for A ft# ^ t I iofonnatj If.q-o ?-------- : CTTY or ORONO - VARIANCE ATTUCATION I ‘I ^ i loiti^ Appuc (SSO.OO ^0- I 4 'Fee .▼ii IIM * < * * *1 vtfunce)____„oo« it cteoRC fc«« otiginR - SmBX fof BOMon***®* **‘*^*'”* . AlM^Fact Fm (Double ippbeiooo fee) ‘ • V ' * ■ m 1^41 ilM :irr u 1 own the edjiceiit proi PiesraiiM of pioperty' 2ocai« District: ocher (specify). ‘"iSSU,.!. V. ^ ’ 6> •v>A :>A r nxmO«mt)_^^2Il£3££l p|ioaB(wock) ,. phoaBChomc)___-----------—— OWNER (if <liffeteflt^ y^»c««> p^ (work)____ Name________-------------------------------rit7: ------------Zip: Address: DESCRIPTION or _____ nictioaCostS r«f<r .^rr/Ffg/ic.nJi^^jeferiftfttisiieett if necctiafy) VARIANCES REQUl Lot Area I J 3* * Lot Width Sctbeck;Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARl ^?£^,^S^odeiequiie^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) r ^ • • hequiked submittals ABrftfct aUxifeftJirilai 1. 2. • i* »♦ — Hcaepn Couay Deputmea <rf Fiouce. A-<03, Oo*t CnMr. 348-3271).V ss"txs*(Sr»"r?s- -»r., M to «“ (•’ copy 8A x II f« (e»«m|«- propo-d »ycl^ to^ |nd. — VC pfapoKd. toxddilioo. ptovkk one (1)copy 8W x '* f<» — (i-tod. o-hui or “ of»yod«p«c« ~ you wbh notified of Itox »ppua«>oo. ir^4]fiti~»«i iitnu as niey be requeued by City tun. 1.;.;, . .,• InfonDatioB suppikd is mie ind correct to the best of his/ber knowledge. >^ppUcaot*s Sigmiure OWNER'S SIGNATURE .«d ftmher sutborirer reasonableTire owner hereby acknowledfes and agrees to this ippU^n^^^ tniCowncU entry onto the property by City sttff, consultants, agents, (^mmissiOT ^!^!bers for purposes of investigation and verificaooo of this request. jd I. thb change prior to dre nreeting. . . 8 maefioik OUtlOT • % { ftm sTsmiIf-ltf-tf 41 LIST'■I'' *■BgglIMSi.pw • i. mmm • j atit KM warn iM M l?*lir*0 41 tMt M 1T-Ilf*a41 tus4 camM. MfUMT m MUON UMf ■ Mil • . ‘.r-:nr# I i‘-¥iMMa» 4 mwt us* CflVtVii MV * . *v* hi-v-*?* > -var*! ♦■•■ uMwm Ml mn MTttTA MN mnM tKUK-a 41 mn M 17<UT>a 41 Ml m4V mmn m mn M ii*ur*ti 44 tn4(ViL I ITML W lV-U7*il 44 MivnT4 Ml mn C H MNm 4 • «l Num cam 4tnt cm* MT m m mn Ml M414 f-K- . 4*’'. iyt Iv . ' i'i^ .fiv y ,1 i ' X' ■ s ^ 4 .*1 ’•. I «i . iWil 9 5 t cnnrv «i TW MB« m m nm. TN4T Tw f sen Mmwim inoN 04 iwroMmnow m it fXN COUNTY atMMTMOir 04 m SMO OfLlif iTf m iw TWO MTt OH 1MI MHPtOrV TAKOTSONi OAH 4 !*• wm \j .ivU ir•«f-/ L- ft^sckKtoi J3V5-q<eyjr^/_g>^/ ' Ipri-«M«al ^40 y; fsa.“gr r assyra.: issr,:.proper ty located I rwel imdenaaii that in ewcabng this acknowied|etnetit. I (wc) am (art) ooc asked to dcclaic approval of disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm fo r that I (we) am (aie) aware of the improvemea plans and that the proposed neighbor pto ject or use retpures Coimcil approval. UJaLrin •7- 9Y ptopetty Owner Date 3//yy/ Prop erty Owner •jrr. I (we)of 3f [print address) taw R»iwtd U» Pto» ft* Iteat tefcned to as Land Use Applicatioo No.-------— I (we) that in execuang tnis acknowtedgement. I (we) am (w) « asked to declaic'*wproval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confuin fx SiwaSn (we) am (are) aware of tte improvemere plam and that the propored nei|hbof a project or use requires Council approval. 7- 5/ - Date Property Owner Date If you have aiqr infor Applicatioee please submit your o to the meeting date. “ ” JSiJwzlS.sr.SSiSS.SSj mU • -t»' \ . \ , ■\ i i . ^ w r TO: ■Bt OATS: CTfT or JIN OCLUNn, rwipiirtT owner gfQUiffi SUD« PEJOIIT* EASEMENT, ETC. 3345 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD lUngnst 23, oNBCBimoN or lally sit on unusod firo hOOMS. Oiwn Tt Allow •xlstinq Btor«9« ■>»•<* tw#nty fiv# foot %K>od^f lane) aandwichad batwaan two raaidantial of a \ la in Itsk to «rantio« p«r«l*»ion, _ or oooowaot,* to allow tha shad to ranaln peasant location. MvtsftVM: MMUTi Whan this shad was built <19^11 I contact^ STSIio ••• toW that . »w«it fo? .”iec...ory building t^t »• uno.r .W of tha housa, ate. rnUMBi thU .djaent p.rc.1 originally *• “ mtfmmrn fov firs aouiDOont to 9at to tha laka. It has na ar __ _davaloDad or usad as such and has baan naintainad as yar STJhS ISiSSnt prSJIrty ownars for ovar 80 yaars. In aarmr dis^sions with*^Public Works Diractor John ®*FJ**^J*^%*''*^ was^t with on sita twical has indicatad no vacatinq this parcal nor objactions to an ahMi TBo siMd is —«^4|a and could ba novad at such tins as niqht ba'naadad to work on tha sawar or if tha railroa %»ara to raquast it ba ras»vad froa thair right-of-way. ■AaflMniPt Tha only possible location for a shad on tha pr^rty ?T?i!?rcori::r°sJ"tK lot. ror «ny on this vary spot. It was followed in tha fiftias by a storag area for fireplace wood and a fishhouse. The lot and heuse are snail, and additional storage ;P«c® I* desperately needed to store lawn and garden equipmnt, b y » outboard motors, lake and dock equipment, tools, etc. The terrain is quite steep and as *j.iJr^cornerrock retaining wall (three or four foot high) on this rear ofth^pJo^rty. It is also the Northern boundary line for the Dakota Railroad track. #1959 continued r Pago rt.r. .r. f.««. «a -«»:•‘5::.*K:rfo; 2t«rti''5o property Un««. By , i2ml »urv«y <k>n« lurch 15, 1»»J. y««r«. M *».«»«*•?.!” ^ of cour»« tiu »h*a •hows tIu r«jl the lot doocrlption. Hy f»«lly h«» *“ 1„ .ddltlon to tIu t||r..lj. .»- :;*?K SS2! *u !S5;?b:’“ahnJ:?t ‘n^ioc.f .i««h.r.. *" “•o5'!r:u‘n‘piiu “.‘in'Cini? **”|*"jrnrr?tt ioU co«.truct.d ond it. .ppoarane. 1. :S J5:.r?S ’J^'nii9hSorhood .nd th. co-unity. COW. I -V. nou incurrod .upon... in oxc. of $1000 for Orono raquirad f««Sp «urv«y», «tc. SurvayApplication for vacation p^party ownara liat, varianca 150 ft. Lagal daacription for ^•*^*^*^®** Additional aurvay for aawar A nanTOia Proparty ownara liat, 500ft vacation 2nd Proparty Ownara liat, varianca Varianca application 1500 250 15 100 140 35 15 200nTH? h pirtlon of th. vacation application f— wa. r.turnad. Thank you for your conaidaration. Sincaraly* Jin Ogland t appear to dofina the en here for close to 50 surv©y don© M©irch 15^ 1 993^ course the storage shed cription. My family has own all these many years. etaining wall, there are gly dictate the location o locate elsewhere. ^rely obscure, hidden from tant and necessary part ted and its appearance is community• Ln excess of $1000 for Orono riance 150 ft. ration ■;er & manhole )ft vacation variance $500 250 1 5 100 1 40 35 1 5 200 $1,255 on fee was returned. Sincerely, fN Jim Ogland €** ‘n ’ - ; - / '7T- mM sxs- ' 'Vv >t- ViiBr^-AS m im ft * ! V A- • - ’ -• ty': 'I.®mm Baaaaaa^ -y irv*- ' , g, . H V '>•, • •v-A Rlv'‘ • : ’•■f' *«i ‘^‘r- i ’»r , .-/VM •/V 1# . • • Im^vW^'^ • O‘ .v>. ^ / / £jm At{A oF 0-lS ' zone. = 7^ 'x 9C' - I iVSO s-f / oF 7£'-2*>' 2d>ne- (^V.J ) I ------5]----- xSo - f/<?2<9$c) La)(c MinnctcrJfici Existing Legal Descripton Lot 9, WALLACE’S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH. This survey shows the location of all existing buildings in relation to the boundaries of the above described property. It does not purport to show any other improvements or en­ croachments . •: Iron marker found o: Iron marker set /•t 4*'^ s r ■ ,»• ■^**- '•■' ;‘v \ ■ ^ J CITYof CmONO H Fetmaiy 12- Mf. tamo W- O****** 3345 CfyJOl B«y Wa]M*. Mlw*** 53391 S,oo*e Shed Comooctioa Dor Mr. Ogliod: U* ted naDef d* Citystortfe sheds coostnicted on your property f^nttifit uflieiolvcd. ■n.i. teiia if >» t««i»ii« rw «> !!!^ Kil nutter.naute tadtet tefil Tbuik you for your eoopewoo in Sincerely. Lyle Oman BuUding Official LO/ch dv- Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning A Btuce L. Ving. Field Impeclof - IV*.473.7307 • i%X ‘^ne*** M r 11^: i. . s' . CrTYoT <HMN(0 2750 W*«» OrvM. W 55354 P 0 3oi M t9f. m June 20. 1994 James OfUnd 3345 Crystal Bay Ro*J Wayzata. MN 35391 RE: Siorife Dear Mr. Ogland o.., ,„U, ,rrii.-..i~. for a v«»Uon of 'HUbide Place' due maiiUy In Novem^ IW . q 'mo 11,0 .till leaver the coosnuctioo of storafe shedi wilh^ a railroad property Thu lenet U 10 re«|uiie removal of ^ feeUree'^^ontacl me a( my UK City »U1 imtiaie lefat actioo. If you lave any queawm. leei ofTice. Sincerely.4- Lyle Oman Buikliiig Official LO/lsv cc:Jeanne A. Mabuuh. Building * Zoning Michael P. Gaffroo, Assistam Builduig * Zoning Adminisuator Bruce L. Vang. Field Inspector Ttitphnat (412) 473-7357 • FAX. 473-4514 fi'.. :r r ’ ^3_i5. SitKfe-Q Z/_i)ZP_2- -?-•'» ■0-: 1 - (irrdJt-^- %’)<1C)-^ -------y— ________________________________________________ ^j-% *7f-lC0 a#AiC t.Cq 76»0 ^4>c^ —. - r^g To; Fi Me: SObJwtT Mayor Callata ant Orooo Coitnci Ron Moorse. City Atomtstmor III N Mkhacl P. Gaffron, Assistani Plaminf * Zonug Aitminwn October 19. I9M IS #1967 Robert S. Obv.^lxvin Geffie/IC-P Properties. Inc.. 4645/4665 BaysiU Road - Pidmiiiiafy Plat Approval Resr*^ - i L A - B > C - D - E • Resedittion Revised Plat Drawing Revised Agreement Ba «ett Memo 10/14/94 <lssyes have ant Eahibils of 10/13/94 m resolved) Gcffre Jetea Plat Mnr.«iiieOcsabei piaiming Coimiiissioo meeting, applkami revised hv leimroduciM the Irvin Geffre property into the plat. Gefire’s residence Ut 1 Block ^and the triai«u)ar easemenl will now be platted as Owto D. „ d» 14-«« O«lo. C » tad «i««y sugge^. I. .ddiUoo. >n>lka«> ta« «««• *»rrr assigns of the Geffics should they sell before Olson and K f Pro|W^«^^ subdivision of OuUot C. City Attorney Tom Barrm iT^^^uTlrc tenerally October 18 and ’Mirsted that his concerns noted in the October 14 memo alleviated, and rre amended that U would be in the City ’s the put that stamte- D28lUalllliliS^BDM ** !l!TiiSi'Sd^S»ld availabUity of that corridor for future roa^ay if needed. vace’ed upon formal Outlot C develop without using Outlets B and D. these casements c “Po application by the property owners. Ple«e review dre menK. of October IJ. wbiclt provide, «MitioMl fKO rt»ut the revired proposal. Pluming Cortimmion «their October 17 meeting recotOT ^ 7 to 0 per UiTten condition, enumer««l by «aff in the October 13 mono, and -Wed two additional conditions; Zfiskv File #1967 Odober 19. 1994 Hfc2 ApsikaBis h*w one year to r • ’ ♦ X wetak « the nwtlwmt corner of sal plat pfopQsai hjr ihit tine. I' i I m - * Mr. IHnca ’t te conme id ■ #9 by requiriof that a road and h and D » part of the current plat. This has been ExhiNt A. Sl^ Staff icconnends approval per the findings and » Mil ^. *ched prelimiiiary Mo>vodby .secoirtBdhy ___. lo adopt Knoto«°granhm preihntaaiy Mmval for a ^ at 4645/4665 Bay^ Road for Robert S. Olson. Irvin Gefffe and K-P Praperties. Inc. • File No. 1967. Vote: ____•)«.--------*»y* --jgBIP' r • • V*. naoLimON GRANTING rHEWi approval por a plat at 4MS/4M5 RA YSIDC ROAD . FILE NO. IW7 iARY RHEREAS* Rolieft S. Oboo of 4645 Bayskk Rood. Irvin Geffre of 4665 Bovskk Rood and K-P Propertka Inc. iq>ft»ci ocd l>y Donald R. PWenon on August 26. 1964. Ato^onMl nbdtvtnon afiplicoikMi vidi the CiQr f« of a rcsideaiial pik of property lei^dly described as : Lois I and 2. Block I. Bayvkw Farms. HennepinC "die prapcfty"); and WIffiREAS, after doe pkNished and mailed notice in accordance with Mumesott SIMM 4«. J58 «. «q. -4 <«« City Oio» » plamuiM Conmusskm held a pnMk hearini on September 19. 1994, ai which *}JP*^*^<lesirinf to be heard concerntaf ihk appikation were given the oppoituniiy to speak thereon, and WHEREAS, the appikams sybmquenUy reviirt ^irpr^^n^ wvwwcd bv the Plaiminc Corwnission at their leg^ meeting of October 17. 1994. at wmcl tiinc Plaimii^ Cornmkiion on a vote of 7 ► o recommended approval of the revised proposal «hI WHEREAS, at their regular ineeling held on 24. 1994. the Orw City Council comideied the subdivision application of Robert S. CMson. Irvm Geffre and Properties Inc., noting the following rmdtngs of fact; 1 within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of approsimately 19.5 acres, of whkh approximaiely l.l acres has been delineate d as wetland. Page 1 of 6 r 3.The pfcpoecd ptai coottiae two k» (desiganed as propoacd Lot I. Block 1 and pyofwcd Lot 1. Bock 2>. orh cnwniaiwg m exotti^ makncc stniciiire. pcopoMd Lot 1. Bhxk 1 bciag 2.75 acres in area, and proposed Lot 1. Block 2 kdiV 1.94 acm ia area. PropoHd Lot I, Block 2 tccliaicatty requires a lot area variance, bat «dl retain ownersittp of an additioml 0.07 acre ouikN and may fain up to w 0.29 acres » noted below, in order to meet the 2.0 acre lot area retattre Hk scpik ssmcin serving the restdenct on proposed Lot I, Block 1 isfiulingand available widdn propowd Lot I extstinc ♦ ■ I wk 1. No septic lesiiag is reqpihed for the 1. Bock 2 since it is a prr-exisiinf lot. In addibon to proposed Lot 1. Block 1 and proposed Lot 1, Bock 2, four out are proposed to be created with the foBowiiii intent for each: Outke A; 0.29 acre remainder parcel to be combine d sriih proposed Lot 1, Bock 2. at such time dwl Ouilots B and D are used for private driveway or road access to ChMloi C. •XIT B: 0.32 acre SO* future road corridor providing acceu for h:liire devehipracnt of Oiilloi C. In the event that Outlol C » hinher developed ming road access from adjacent properties not rcquiriiy the use of Ouilots B and D, Outlois A and B wUl be legally combined with proposed Lot 1. Block 1. Outlet C: 14.13 acre parcel intended for future devdopmenl into single family rcskkniial lots. OutkN C is intended to not be buildable for even a single residence unless or until it b further subdivided and/or replattod into one or more building sites. Outlet D: 0.07 acre future road corridor segment to complete continuous access in coniunction with Outloc B for future devdopmem of Outlol C. in the event that Outlot C b further developed using road accesses from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlets B and D, Outlot D will be legally combined with the proposed Lot 1, Block 2. Page 2 of 6 f . I i e \ I ( r :• . m Mri D BTOviifc cooliawB *cess to Onlot c from B*y»kle Hold, The wtfa»g«ffhMlniDcoinckto withMCxalMtaccetoCMeacrtom lot I.Phxh Vfcjltaw F»im « f«oc of UX 2. Block 1 . B»y»k»i F»ms. 11* 1^^ ^ L iMrf I B«»i»* F«« n lhi» IKOFO-J pta« » B* lubject of « ^ '• „ E>hiM A. «l«h teUs d* .Fpl*«iO- iMcnl ic|*«lii^ B* fBOBt we end div»ilioo of (Moo A. B end D. Iii.ll* CBv t iM BW if OuBoo B end D «a BewlopeB for “ " ^ll2^r^Z^Mi*iM ie«ide«cesoo|>iopowB Lor I. Block I nri |*^^,r^l-.*'‘**-.*7*i-MCT*Mii*tdtivc*iYicccMwowo8aidiicwfD«dwd d* ciiistnd diwcl drivewn «*«*» lo Baytide RoiB h im B* CkT t 1-^ B*i ia B* cvca Owlo* B and D MO wed jo B« ftumt tor p^fpoaea dw auck road ihall be coodiucieB «o Cily J* ^ CkvT ioaea Bar to order » gwnMcc d* ftaioi* acceaa «o Owb ■ C. Ball prorae 10 B« Cky roatard road ^ SU B aad D U is B* CUy a AiiBier te oced for acceaa via tt Boo B and D. dal ruch road and -lllity “Jr^,---------- formal regnea of B* property pawn .a -a-r'kw*. ih^ Oirtlott A. B and C ihiai lenttin in common ownenhip !mU OailSc a further aevetoped. and that (hnloi D shall remain in common unld inilioi C » lunwr » . ____ r U Aitther <^vc ownership whh pr It i« the Citv’s imeni that at the time OutkH C b further devetoped. the City will a of pwk dedicaion fee. and «»*“ I^^^aS^I^^opriTpoblic earemeiw within OuBor. A. B. C and D t. i. rt* City r mam Bar ptopored Lor I. Block I and propoaed 1^1. Block 2 Srl^^tlriaed periiJSS^liiy and drainage ««»en*iw bared on B* Oat OuttaSTS D will in the future becoine a roadway. Although Hennepin ^oo^Oq^™^'ri3«^^w!nte Orono Comprehensive Plan. Page 3 of 6 ■ t A drill.™ CMcart OW owtot B p'” SiSTsrsu *^-0-10.8 t4. Tht Ciitfit P**^”*** ^ *Lot I. Block 2 itqmit BD fuilliw vifiMKet. %. • I.- - V furfia«» ■olcd *bo*e. the OV ^ 4445/4*45 BiyMl* lto«l pcf ^»*«- ””■ ^ "*^ A, Pr-cb of U. S«veys Coow •« •*»“ ® I OydoB A. B «i C il»B mnm to ivd^. OiiUol O itaB «nton to o»«nh» .i.«u OmM C i» Itotow Bevdofod. ^ _________laMtodtcporedMtou|K»<l«vdot««“«>> D tie used for roidway puipoict. 3.Ouriots B and P we puttot D U forthet developed. InAe evc« dial (Woi ^ l^^lyof Oud^ B and D a* ro«lway accc«, dieo Outlois B and D miia « ^ aned with adjacem propertiesI, M'». Outlol C b created for futureissued for Outlet C uiail such time that u IS leplaiied uio one or niiHc lots. In the evem that Outlets B and D are “**^*|^*J^ BteTnurfpr^^ development mO^C, said Outlot roadway and Lot 1, Block 2 shall revise their dnveway wcauom eliminate direct access to Bayskfc Road. Page 4 of 6 r 7. 10. A driwray caxm cat ovtr Oiillol B shall be granacd in favor of prcpoacd Lot 1 I for dTwii*'***^ use of the existii^ driveway in (^nlot B. Proposed Lot 1 perimeter drtiaaie . • 'i w 1 and proposed Lot 1, Block 2 are subject to t<te standard uuliiy easements. No « »I 4 ♦1 rifht-of-way for County Road 84 will be granted although Hennepin it. Standard drainiBe and utility easemems shall be gramed over Ouilois B and D at this time. However, the City will iiot require payment of park dediwtkm to or the of ad d****”* public easements witfiin Outlom A. B, C and D until Oudot C is further developed. The residence on proposed Lot I. Block I shall be provided with a new septic system within the time frame and requirements of the City code. The metal tH** at the northwest comer of Outlet C shall be removed V Uhin one year of final plat approval unless a complete formal applicatioo for subdivisioo of Ouilol C has been submined by that date. it Tl« foltowii, lb. or (tol s»l»iiiub i»« be lutaaied »Ite weeks prior » ttie tefularly leheduleJ Council meeting on Ike second and loufth the mocidi; 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to T - 200’. Drawing to include: A. U* lines plsmsl per pediminwy survey by Ri»m^ Surveys Company Inc dated August 25. revised October 13, IW4. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" within proposed Lrt I, Block 1. such easemems being 10’ in wi^ ^Td^i^and lines. 10’ in width along the westerly boundary adjaM to Oatl« B, and 5 ’ in width along the scmthwesierly and souto proposed Lot I, Block 2, such easemems being 10 m wi^ north lot lines. 5 ’ in width Jr tte width along the boundary with Outlet D. and 3 m width along the southerly lot lines. B Page 5 of 6 r 2.Legal dociMBeott mpircd: Tiik opinicMi addressed lo the City. AO owncis . n rs with prtycf ty iaere st hidicaied Acretn shall tigfi □nKT docMMca B affected by such imerest. * v! Vi- -!< AM ♦:»^ hokScn or and all The agpiicaai must provide ccttiried copies of all recorded carreaily affecting the property. ^ w I I *1 I Signed and eiecuied driveway propoae d Lot 1, Blodi I. cascn ieHt over Oudot B in favor of 3. Fees to be paid: A. Legal review and filing fees » $2 I Total dye: SmfiQ! heUOci Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting 24. 19M. ATTEST: F Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Ir.. Mayor . j STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) »• COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ^ , Hie foregoiiv insttument was acknowledged before me on tim 24th day of October, 1994, by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. A Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayw A City Clerk *** City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instnimeni was executed on behalf of the City. c i i ’. :; i Noiaiy Public Page 6 of 6 • I Mi 9S44I 47i-S3tl r.i. Scale I* • iQQ Caff liqrtau, m SS3fl : €li-53l7 l^fve ®ite Ne^arcd - Anfvst 25, 1994 mi 71N Av» •, iac • . i. . Ml $5429 3093 t S.H. OltM •ttcrlftlm: l9t f, 01«€k 1. lATflOl FMm c«iMf af Hnncfia. Mi sabjcct U Ml—att «f rtc — Inrla T. msoiftf*. ficffre •ncrlttlM: i^i. OY— 1. MYvico rmm iin— >ts •# racarO, TafalArM It.t Acrtt T— M—traf utt 2 Tafafl MiwMr cf Oiiiais 4 UM.iiM 2.79 Acrtt: OalM A 0.29 Aaratt Oallat • 0.92 Acraat filial C 14.19 Acrat: Oaiiiaait# WttianA 11 Acratt OclIatO 0.07 Acrat t Uf l.ilh.2 1.94 Acratt All Afsttacat are appf’octMte and subject ta cliaafc oa flaal alat T—trapfcy fraa • City of Orano Matar sapoly * Mall Saaltary Sawar • Septic TYPICAL LOT tim b«.alc CttimtnK / LlfiM <%• I w I hereby certify that this plat mt prepared by ae or under ty direct supervision and that I aa a duly repistored land surveyor under the laws of the State of Ninnesota Dated this 2Sth day of Aupust, 1994 n .A * .1^ .4 t * r :t<<* agreement _________ w ««• f*e a*»«« of Lot 2. Block I. B«jr»»«or "T^J^UiT It V«*«i** |N«cfca*« of Mi4 lo«, katby Em. K*^ bJT I B<rm« F» tbamm m OoikM tec ia te «*«* **^^"****? igaian^ loco koiliiH^ patcd* a foo^ay U^ -3rlr '^zr^ r *’’.*’1 ^it**?*? «*ifct»c.’ I4» » f«l. !»««« N«<*«'j •'^ r 2 W«^ ' “*»“*• F—> « <^ r^" ’>' •**■"■• ik«t« icrfliiaatiBf . ». I fM owwn of Loc I. Block I. Bay»i«w lr«ia T Ocffw aaJ Macfonc L ______OMlot A aad pofi Earn., a. • •“* of fotwo 0«^ t^u-Sr^Sr •yik^propofc ^k dodicaUoa Of r«wr»aiio« r.l». 9km of bmUM* •‘‘i^rr aciackcd Eaykil A of Ooiloi B M acctw to CmlKW » miwww Si^cd iM 1994 Rokort S CHaoo MaffarotwToiMW Fee owiicn of Lot 2. Block 1 Dayview Faf®i K-P Pfope^uc. Imc. ^ _ ^ y presidcol *^rvZZ^A^4ll lUoterma Cootract pofckaier of Lot 2. Block I. Bay%iew Faww Doodd R. Peimoo Irvia T. Geffre % Maijoric L. Fee ooocri of Lot I. Block I Bayview Farais. Ikeir keirc aod asiigos LV S'- • •‘"t . PRELIKPN'APY plat OFBAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITIONaiY OF ORO^^O. COUT'JTY OF HEftCRii "•v!=Li ''.:^Y ■■ 'N W\' LOT SURVEYS CO. lANO SURVCYORS■ •» mm **mm m HMTt . m ttfi* H.i*«i-» •% I*!*** tM • t- •*rt 'i»4 ».. « :>»w«iva fw« <■• V P^ma» «■• t «M • •«<«« %«« I. »•««• I. •MM9 •« «• <• •••#<»««« •» »»»•►• I mm mmrn*» * mm *mm*mt mm mrnm. m I. I»t«if« fi«m WHI» m,mmm$m. m m mmmmmm mi m%mrn mm mm i9$ mmm tmrn mm-m t ^ | i«wn • C# •.•» I I fl m»m$ •mm •mm* mm* • t M awM t fb««iC I* •! M*MS mm rnmmm mm» •mm* M* I • •• •«>•»' Ml till—M mm UMiHM —M# 9<m «^««i to itoMto •• •rto (Itv •< «»•«• toll • ta»«H totor M to»*Mrv o <orr TYPICAL LOT »*•!« Ik«4.l4i » ■ ■ . T ' f • 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! Ly._J 1 ROAD r 1 rnnrrt HMK ^pMQRAiaaM 3300 Plptr Jaffniy Tower 222 SoutA Nlotb Sacct MtnnetpolU, Mlnneiou 55402 (612) 333-»SOO TO:aiwl zonini Administratot Ciiy of Orono V^A TELECQgY FROM: RE: DATE: Thomas J. Bwielt, EsQ> Item #J9<7 Robert S. Olson/K-P Properties, Inc. October i*’I994 Mike, after the 1«‘CouwU rdalefia06«4.1 am documents you ,o the proposed large lot labeiled Outlot B appears to require accc»» — „ a ia«r atmmpt to deveiop “ to the development of the proposed coniingent planned for road, represented by l.. to the road proposed.0 IVttU .0 evaluate dm im”:iirf^:Sp-» Um developer to open a road ov«.U)t2- Jg ^°LThi:i“ would k UomTOMa ! Aereement that the -successora and H j.. ..litas^arnTdie the terms of 'he Aarecmwi. Second, ^ __ - ^ ,p whether Atrecmem. u *» iwv»-w«v ---------------- j Fy______ s^jgniitM. me ^liy wool- disllable Apec. of simply opening a previously platted road. Outlot D on Lot 1 thou { a previously piaucu *v»u. I realiie that platUn*a road '* *" would be .0 place lot D. has the undesirable impact of the road, even .011. One possible scenario for you^conslderau^ ^ igh it is undesirable, and then to note in our . A.g -q-^j jg^cssAgreement and the planned Outlot A as the more desirable road access. though it is undesirable, and then to note in our IbrAgrcemcni and the planned Outlot A as the more desirable road access. Mike, this memo sets out my concerns. Please call to discuss. 0lMM6Wi6 lOfl3/94 r > ; r ‘ CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: K-P Properties, Inc. Donald R. Peterson, President 12435 42nd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 ZONING FILE #1967 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: October 19, 1994 COPIES: Robert S. Olson 4645 Bayside Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 Irvin Geffte 4665 Bayside Road Maple Plain. MN 55359 type of APPLICATION: Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 10/17/94 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST menK,. plus following condUions: 1 1 Metal shed in noithwesl comer of Oullol C .hall be removed within one yew of final put approval if no application for further subdivision of Outlot C is submitted by that time. 12. City Attorney to review revised agreement. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as; City Council. Monday. October 24, 1994; meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minute, they ate available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. r To: f From: Date: Subject: Note: Chairman Schroedcr and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator October 13, 1994 #1967 Robert S. Olson/K-P Properties, Inc.. 4645 Bayside Road - Preliminary Plat Approval - Referral from City Council Planning Commission reviewed this item on September 19 and at applicant’s request recommended denial to move it along to the Council. Council reviewed the item on October 10 and referred it back to Planning Commission. List of Exhibits A - Revised Plat Drawings Including Geffre Property B - Council Action Notice 10/13/94 C - Planning Commission Minutes 9/19/94 E - Memos and Exhibits of 10/6/94 and 9/15/94 Application Background At your September meeting. Planning Commission revietved a proposed split off tte Olson residence from the mmaining 14 acres, lea^ mjajige ^el “ »n included in the plat. Further, septic testing had not been submitted for the exis g residence with a failing system. Planning Commission offered the applicant tabling until information “ c^kT coSruiirz;:;s:is::i den[^^^^^ m—s including a triangular easement over Geffre’s property to provide the continuous fumre roau outlot connection to the large outlot. At their October 10 meeting. Council and City Attorney easement vs. outlot issue and directed that Planning Commission further review th . P from the City Attorney regarding acceptability of the easement. Zoning File #1%7 October 13, 1994 Page 2 Shortly after the Council meeting, applicants notified staff that they iKlude the Geffre properly and submit with an ouUot per staffs recommendation (see Exhibit A). Additional Information * An acceptable on-site sewage treatment site evaluation i^it has been primaiy and alternate sites for immediate and futute use on the Olson property. • Since inclusion of the Geffre property is functionally a lot line rearrangement that provides him more property potentially suitable for future septic “se without removing any existing septic capability, no septic testing has been required for the Geffre property. Acreages for each parcel are as follows: Total Area = 17.49 acres Proposed: Lot 1, Block 1 (Olson) Lot 1, Block 2 (Geffre) Outlot A Outlot B (future road) Outlot C (for future development) Outlot D (future road) 2.75 ac 1.94 ac 0.28 ac 0.32 ac 14.13 ac 0.07 ac With the current proposal per staff’s recommendation, the ^ HoweS:r. Geffre s lo. is “XDfor ouilo. A if dm B-D cortidor is used in developing Outlot C (in which case Geffre ends up with 2.22 acres). L7.o''-rr^“astg»-' rdTrenTT o« of ^Sperty. The City Attorney has been asked to teview the agteemem. ZZTuZ “veCm of potential for acquiring that property appears to be poor at this Zoning File #1967 October 13, 1994 Page 3 . Per the County Public Works request and past City practice, if C^Uot B is eventually used for road purposes, then both the Olson and Geffre residences wi be required to remove their Bayside Road accesses and construct new acces^s to the wUot road. This raises the question as to how or whether the Olson “sidence will be able to access from an interior road if Outloi B is never used and the 14 acre parcel is developed using access from the White property. Since Olson ’s existing driveway is at what the County considers a safe location, perhaps this continued access would be acceptable. • K-P Properties ’ Don Peterson has advised it is their intent to initiate subdivision of Ae ifacres (using Outlots B and D for access) as soon as septic testing is complete... Staff Recommendation suff recommends approval of the applicanfs current proposal subject to the following conditions: 1. Outlots A. B. and C shall remain in Si unUlS^Jtdeveloped. Outlot D shall remain in ownership with Lot 1, Block 2 until outioi C is further developed 2. 5. Outlot A is considered as an unbuildable remainder of OuUol C. OuUot A shall be either combined with Outlof B ^Sbl’lfeaHy 1 if Outlots B and D are na used for road pu.^ “ S ‘nd for combined with Lot 1. Block 2, in the evem that Outlots B and D as used roadway purposes. Outlots B and D are platted for future roadway purposes and shall ** combined with adjacent properties. lots. in the event that Outlots B and D are us^ « an ^«s roa^se^ing a fotur. development in Outlot C, the and eliminate directshall revise their driveway locations onto said outlot roadway ana eiinu access to Bayside Road. " 1 Zoning File #1967 October 13, 1994 Page 4 10. h A driveway easement over OuUot B shall be granted in favor of Lot 1 for continued use of the existing driveway in Outiot B. The plat is subject to the standard perimeter drainage and utility easements. No additional right-of-way for County Road 84 will be granted although Hennepin County has requested »t. At the time Outiot C is further developed, the City will at that time require payment of park dedication fees and the dedication^ all necessary appropriate public easements within Outlots A, B, C and D. The Olson property shall be provided with a new septic system within the time frame and requirements of the City code. Z’ Options for Action 1. Recommend approval as noted above. 2. Table for more information. 3. Recommend denial, stating reasons. 4. Other. CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. #1%7 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: October 14, 1994 TO: K-P Properties, Inc. Donald R. Peterson, President 12435 42nd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 COPIES: Robert S. Olson 4645 Bayside Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 Irvin Geffre 4665 Bayside Road Maple Plain, MN 5.^’S:# type of APPLICATION: Preliminary Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: October 10, 1994 VOTE:FOR 0 AGAINST COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: Ref.n«. back .o Planning Commission on » -^iiday, October i/, ivw. me meeu ^ i ; ORONO jPLANNlNG COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 19,1994 ROLL The Orono mnning Commission met on the above date with the foUowing^cmbcrs present: Vice5t^ Stephen Peterson, Sandra Smith, Charles Nolan, Jr^d Janice Berg. Chair Charies ScH^er, Daie Lindquist, and Candace Rowiette woe^senL Assistant Planning and ZoningAdministrator Michael Gaflfron and RecordpKSheny Frost represented Staff*. Ma^^^ward Callahan and Councilmem^J. Diann Goetten were present. Vjce-Chair PetoWp called the meeting to order 3^7:00 p.m. 4115/4125 WA;n:RTOWN ROAD - [GEMBmr - RENEWAL OF 2/16/93 (#1) #1800 - MICHAEL P] SUBDIVISION OF A LOT RE- approval The Affidavit of Publication and Certifi^ll^of Mailing were noted. It was moved by Peterson, secondpdoy Smimivjo table Item #1800 to the October 17, 1994 Planning Commission Meplmg. Ayes4, N^O. (#2) #1914 - THOMAS PHYLLIS COLWEl NORTH SHORE DRIVE/1130 OLD CRYSTAL B- A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - REVISION The Affidavit tf^^blication and Certificate of Mailing were nb^. The appUd^ts were not present. It was noted that the revision wab>minor and not a substaii^ change from the previously approved layout. ItWs moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of Item #1914. Ayi4'4, ------------- TIM & BETH TRAFF, 2640 ROAD - SUBDIVISION OF («) «M7 - DONALD R. PETERSON, K-P RAVSIDE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND LOT LINE4645/4665 BAYSIDE ROAD REARRANGEMENT The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. Peterson was present. • r * y vfTMirrES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSIONheld on SEPTEMBER 19.1994 (#3) Bern #1967-D. Peterson/Geffie - ConriEued j .«.rtvislocatedSouthofBaysideRoad.E3SlofCountyRoadl9. The Gaf&on stated property is lo include the Gefire and Olson properties, iniual request was involving six project. The City's two primary goals Appticanfs have been locations and drainfields that would mert thehave been to create suitable ac -nnlicairt wishes to separate the Gefire residcnc linit for mound systems. AUhis ^mt PP *eir 17.5 acre par«>.J” “ 6om the appfication, " ! „openy as Outlot A to be platted later. If to ^ designate the to be created for future develop UK sMiticijtt Wbn.in.1 >UM n«i^ Vine The surveyor created a new outlot p _ ^ drawing is to show the City what h«n S^to for the fumre the 30' retbach ftem current plans are for splitting off the house. i (-ommission members. D. t S 50V copies of to revision to faoilitate the sale of the Peterson stated the reason for the had been done, andp. “<* Olson residence. Arc'-rwofth^epu ^'’hIm ot the conceptual five-lot plan jo not have if they wish “ So^Tpct^;^» >o. »a Smith asked if this would be setting a this would cause n^f i^ove only an outlot" “ rrntoConfo^lS^S. xfl Geffie to be less than two acres ^ ^ •„ ,he big sulMlivisron prtott ^8 o^fm Voval or denial ftom the of having the acc^«o re to City Counal. County will require conditions attached to it. minutes of the orono planning commissionMEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 19,1994 (#3) Item #1967 - D. Tetersoo/Ge&e - Contiaued Petcreon moved. Smith seconded, to deny the appUcation #1967. Ayes 3-Peterson, Smith, Berg; Nays 1-Nolan. ~UA\ Ui%9S - PAT WOLFE, 2871 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTEB^THE-FACT VARIANCES - PuS^ HEARING ^ The AffidavU of PublicatioiKand Certificate of Mailing were n^. The appUcant was not present. Smith noted appUc^assumed the item was being t^ed at his prior request. It moved by Peterson, secon^by Berg, to table 895 for review at the October 17 meeting. Aycs4,NaysXX ' ITEM #1948 - FRANK KOKl^^JOAN M.^^ARMON, 4100 WATERTOWN K^COWmoSZuSE - CONTINDATION OF PUBUC HEARING \ The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate ^Mailing were noted, Gaffion noted the applicants attorney had requested tabling. / It was moved by Peterson, seconded by B^g. toN^lc #1948 to the October 17, 1994 meeting of the Planning Conunis^n. Ayes 4. Nays 0. (#6) ITEM #1953 - WILLIAM AJ^EN, 3475 AVENUE - VARIANCES - CONTINUATIW OF PUBLIC HEARING The Affidavit of Publication aiulXertficate of Mailing we^ noted. Mr. Allen was present. Item #1953 was tabled iidm last meeting pending r«eipt of been received. This prti!^ is for an addition to the house ania dec^ Tbe^tion between this addition the garage would be only 3+ ft , jaback Applicant is asidog ^i side setback variance from the ten ft ^ nroperty variance between thtbuildings. No hardcover variance is meets the 35% liXand no structural lot coverage v^ce is requiffd since the property meets the ISOO^ft allowed per code 10.03 subdivision C. U' ’rt=> r.^ -^CIL ACTION f DATE: October 6, 1994 ITEM NO.; / / Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: ZoningDepartment Approval: Name Michael P. Gaff.on T^l^e Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Item P«Trir«<""’ «1%7 Robert S. Olson/K-P Properties Inc , 4645 Bsyside Road • Prelimiiuty Plat Approval - Resolution District; RR-IB, Single Family Rural Resktemial, 2 acre. Request to split off a 2.75 acre lot with existing residence from 17.5 acre parcel Ust pij. Drawings Received 10/6/94 C - Development Agreement with Neighboring Property Owner D - Resolution , E - Planning Commission Action Nonce 9/26/94 F - Planning Commission Minutes 9/19/94 G - Hennepin Public Works Letter 9/16/94 H - Memo and Exhibits of 9/15/94 Pertinent Facts 1.Total area = 17.49 ac. Proposed; Lot 1 Outlot A Outlot B Outlot C 2.75 ac. 0.28 ac. 0.32 ac. (futtire road) 14.13 ac. (for fumre development) Proposed Lot 1 with existing residence meets all area/width/setback requirements. The existing residence has a failing septic and r^mo^:^ and hrture use. el. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 5 October 6, 1994 Zoning File #1967 Application Background Applicants had initially included the adjacent Irvin Geffte property at 4665 Bayside in a proposed plat to create five new building sites. Applicants worked with staff regarding road layout and sei^ requirements for proposal and concluded that only four new lots would be p» nsible. Concurrently K-P Properties has been attempting to acquire the h red and David White acrJge to the immediate west, but have been unsuccessful to-date, although such a transaction is still being pursued. Rather than proceed with the four lot subdivision, just prior to the Planni^ rommission meeting applicants revised the proposal to merely splitting off the Olson residence and leaving the remaining Olson acreage for development later this year or early next year. Annifeants with suff lo accomplish such a subdivision tol would not leave the remaining acreage landlocked, and which would result in the exiMing retlL^e ”ng no variances regardless of whether a (umre subdivision occurs. Planning Commission Denial Reconunendation r.Uw II, f.™.. .1^ “.Sic. Planning Commission suggested that applicant work with staff to prepare a subdivision plan for presentation to Council. Outlots Intended for Future Development Staff advised applicants that splitting off tire res^toice „ Sayside through landlocked. Potential access to the remairang 14 a,.,, is through u« White’s property, which applicants don’t control. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 5 October 6, 1994 Zoning File #1967 Staffs recommended solution was to create a private road outlot (Outlot B) in the potential road location through Lot 1. This also left a small parcel (Outlot A) adjacent to the Geffrc property, which would be combined with Geffre’s residence parcel if Outlot B was indeed used as a road right-of-way in the future. Olson ’s remaining 14 acres is designated as Outlot C with the understanding that it inay not^ developed for even one single family residence without future City approval. This delays the payment of park fees for the 14 acres until it is further developed. Staff further recommended that the Geffre property be included in the plat (see Exhibit B) and a triangular outlot matching a pre-existing access easeineni be platted to provide » complete outlot connection from Bayside Road to Outlot C. Applicate proposed this recommendation by omitting Geffre from the subdivision, and proposes the City s acceptance of a development agreement between Olson, K-P Properties, and Geffre (see Exhibit C). Geffre Property - Easement vs. Outlot The aereemem (Exhibit C) indicates that if Outlot C is replatted to buildable lots and Outlot B fo™ rold. then Geffre will receive Outlot A in exchange for becommg a part of tha future plat and creating a triangular outlot to complete the road connection through the sou comer of Geffre’s property. Conversely, if the White property is acquired and a hiture road access to not using Outlot B. then Geffres involvement would be unnecesary airf ^ ® would revert back to the Olson property and be combined as pan »f Lm ‘ ex^° to neeative impact if this occurred would be that the Olson residence would likely expect to coLnue accessing directly to Bayside Road rather than being roadway. That would be an issue for discussion and a potential variance if the full multiple lot plat was before you now (see 9/15/94 memo Exhibit FV One additional quirk: The agreement discusses replaiting Outlot C into could be construed as not anticipating Outlot C being replatted as " ^ s^f case of replatting Outlot C into a single buildable lot or requesting Cipt approval for s^. sw michrareue tlut the addition of (^tlot A and subtraction of a triangular road Geffre-s property yield in effect a three lot plat which should be served by a which the oLn residence, the Geffre residence, and the new lot mwt accew. ^ 7c!^ld be considered as merely a lot line rearrarigemem betw^Grf^ *Sis to™i™ creation of a private driveway outlot to serve the large parcel to the rear. This rp would be left to Council. r Request for Council Action continued page 4 of 5 October 6, 1994 Zoning File #1967 _________ Hennepin Public Works Department Comments Hennepin DOT has indicated approval of Outlot B as an access location. They also request additional right-of-way to total 40’ from the centerline of Bayside Road. It would be inconsistent with past City practice to require this on Bayside Road which is defined in the Comprehensive Plan as a "collecter" street requiring only 30-33’ either side of centerline. Staff recommends no additional right-of-way be required at this time. Summary of Issues 1. Will Council accept the agreement in lieu of including Geffre’s property in the plat to create a continuous access outlot corridor to Outlot C? 2. Will Council accept the concept of making the remaining 14 acres an outlot with no development (not even one house) allowed until it is replatted or granted individual buildability in the future? Council may wish to confirm applicant’s intent for proceeding with replatting Outlot C in the next year with or without the White property. Options for Action 1. Approve per the findings and conditions of the preliminary plat approval resolution attached. 2. Refer back to Planning Commission for ftir»her review. 3. Direct staff to draft a resolution of denial, stating reasons. 4. Table, requesting further information (specify). 5.Other. Staff Recommendation In recognition of Planning Commission’s intent in recommending denial, staff has prepared a resolution for preliminary plat approval incorporating applicant’s proposed preliminary plat and agreement as presented. While staff wo Id prefer the inclusion of the (^ffre property to create a complete outlot corridor to Outlot iie agreement appears to eliminate foreseeable access issues as long as its term "replatted in mildable parcels" can be constated as including the mere revision of Outlot C to single builuable lot status. If not, then language of the agre<^ent should be revised to do so, or the Geffre property should be included in the plat and the triangular outlot created. r Request for Council Action continued page S of S October 6, 1994 Zoning File <^1967 ______________ COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Take action to approve, conditionally approve, deny or table, or refer application to Planning Commission for further review. -O , . 4 i / Wl I I .1 • ; • 1 i* •A • :. * ■ • * • •I . j •____________—uc. 84 'n If*. t ~1 • . t • v.<f,■-y; «.?s f i ‘vv‘; 1 »■ • r- y-': MfA'DDITIGN CNNEPIN ' ; j : :ns . ..1/ ' T : . <* *#•* ■OT SURVEYS COMPANY. INC AND SURVEYORS t . • * I *1 I •r• • • • . . 1 • • u*. ii . lMlc« ■». 39I7$A fto. ---------- Seal# I* ■ tgg* » • 5 ■ •i.y- Oofi ftttrm K - 7 Troptrtits lac. 1I4X 4M Avt. NiMrtll. to SS441 Noat: 4M-S317 Cafliccr: Ooa Tfttrtoa 3048 torcA Store Drive toy fit!, to SS3D1 Ttoat: 478-S3I7 tote 8rieire8 - tofvst IS. 1SS4 til lot Sorveyt Co.. Inc. 7601 ?3rd Ave. i. •rooAlye tort, to SSA28 Itoae: SIO-3D93 Aobert S. tad toryiret 8. Olson AMS Ityslde toed Orofio. 101 Description: lot I. Hock 1. lAYVlCM FA8KS coeaty of tofmepla. to subject to cisoMoti of record Tolol Aroo IT Af AcffI Tolol Nuaibor of Lots I TotolNymbor ofOmiots 3 Lot Arm Lot I 1.78 Acrost Oollot A 0.28 Acrost tofloi 6 0.32 Acroii OuMoiC 1413 Aeros* Oollfifotod WtMond 1.1 Acrost All dIsUaces ore opproslBote end subject to cNiOfo on ftaol plot » • 'Topogripby froa • City of Orono toter sipply • toll typica U lot |J« bcMtc ii . Ml 00»lMOt«€0SI«O«n^*. 0 / OolUlrt) P«lto«0 HaSs ^..1 II / _____i I Hereby certify tliot tbit plot trot prepared by ao or under to OIroct supervltloa tad ttot I oa a duly refittered load turveyor under tto lotit of tto State of Mlanetota Dated Uili 25th dey of Aufuot, IMA ' : A « } ,s ^^^^^PUCA^^r 9.^7.7y Is r / AGRIil-.MnKr . M W Ohon fee owners of Lol 2. Block I. Bay view R„b..l S. ,„c,. p«.cl.«.r •<« l.«.by nt<« LL .r: or ..o. 2. Bi«k 1. 0.,-.. n-™*.,.c eve. Liii. .»d».o»..»y i. C on tlic nllnclu'*® L.%liioH A is p r 1 ? niock I Unyvicw l-arms dedicated ot icecivid willml Ibal '“JX. then the above oaroe.1 ..hielt i. »bo«« a. Oatlot " orf“r,md Matjotie L Oeffr. that ,,aitiea heieby npiee to deed to It tn ^ ^ ^ .itaebed Dihibtt pottion of Lot 2. Illoek I. ^tibit A boonded b, a line dcaeribed A attd a fottion ol Ontlo cofner of Lot 2. Block I. Bayview a. followa: Hep.i.n.a* of Lol 1. Block I. Bayvtct. Latina; fiuina which ia alao the ,|„„„ S 00 45" OO" E distance „«nc. Nocth 80 45' t«." ' i f-- thenc. No.th..ly .lo»« r'LMinc Tin 2 ithnk I, Bayview natal, to the .ntinl of .w,.»n.u, and llicfc lcriiiii»a*'''Jt Itvin T. Oeffte and hhatjotic “ q",, J ‘“.''^11*" IpeeTo'' j^n in aiieh l» ilecil fulnrc OihI.h A ami pnri fuiwrc pint of ImiUlablc parcels wliicli •*»“ shown on ali.iclirtl l-.xhihil A. Signcil this •irmF Fee owners of Lol 2. Block I Bayview Farms Margate!Olson K-P Fropc^jes. By: Goiiiraci purchaser <»f l ol 2, Block L Bayview Farms president Doiialcl U IVicisoii ----------- Irvin T. Ocflre Marjorie Fee owners of Lot I. BU»ck I Bayview I’-'irm.s mite .^T* • *f • ■.*.-■* *;*.i • •* ' -V - *- **• ^ S •_ • ', % '••♦. •*• *; '*• - -•• •. •. I ■ v: ■(>>■ % •i 4 _ • »-• “‘ _ »• • b — = 5 ' I i • -’s§ 9 — 9 , •ir l.jfiii*.......................................5r5rDl S -eZ *»t*C5 > KC&V^ • *v»/ V i*** . », • *' * * • •. • 4 ^ «• . I • • . * . , , .**' • • ♦ • * t ,1*. • • • ••.••. f f * • t ‘ ‘', . . ' . . / •* • -* . /. •k .V*.’..:V * • •* V r.V \ •.:. r, r- ,ii A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 4645 BAYSIDE ROAD - FILE NO. 1967 WHEREAS, Robert S. Olson of 4645 Bayside Road and K-P Properties Inc. lepttsemed by Donald R. Peterson on August 26, 1994. filed a formal suMivis^ IrithSeCity of Orono for approval of a residential plat of property legally described as follows. Lot 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms. Hennepin County. Minnesou (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota C. earaac If.') *^58 et sea. and the Citv of Orono’s Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 1994, at which toiring*to be heard concerning this application were given the opporturaty to speak thereon. C..I, noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB. Single Family Rural Zoning District requiting a minimum of 2 acres of comiguous ly ui within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a .otal of approximately acres, of which approximately 1.1 acres has been delineated as wetland. 3.The proposed plat contains one lot (designated as Lot 1) residLrstracmre. such lot being 2.75 acres in area, exceedmg the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement. 4.The septic system serving the residence on Lot 1 is failing and is ^ KplaX pSinaty Lsite sewage treatment systems sue evaluation data Page 1 of 7 1 5. 6. 7. indicates that primaiy and alternate drainfieid sites for current and ftituie u^are IvaSe^dSn Jpropeny. subject to a final site evaluation report being submitted by the site evaluator. In a.t.tition to Lot 1. three Outlots are proposed to be created with the following intent for each; Outlot A 0.28 acre remainder parcel to be combined with Lot 1, Block U toyview Farnis at such time that OuUot B is used for pnvate driveway or road access to Outlot C. m Outlot B- 0 32 acre 50’ future road corridor providing access for future ® of C. in Ke «em that Outlot C is using ^d accesses from adjacent properties not ““ °f OutlM B. Outlots A and B will be legally combined with proposed Lot 1. rtt Outlot C- 14 13 acre parcel intended for future developmeitt into single ' family residemial lots. Outlot C is imended to not he buildable for a single tesktence unle» or until it is further subdivided and/or replatted into one or more building sites. Outlot B does not provide continuous access to Outlot C from Bayside Road ™ C^dtL B aSd C do no abut one anodier. Outlot B only ProvKi« rouuot C in conjunction w^^ an e^ing ^s « for road purposes. I, is the City’s intent that if Outim B a^ f^^^^^“';eClorc‘:^'n Block 1. Bay view Farms are j Bay view Farms shall construct the existing residences on Lots 1 and 2, Bl«k 1. V j. driveway driveway accesses onto said new road and eliminate the existing one accesses to Bayside Road. Page 2 of 7 8. 9. 10. ll. 12. 13. 14. It is the City’s intent that in the event Outlot B is used in the future for road purposes, that such road shall be constructed to City standards, and that prior to construction of said road the City will be granted a road and utilities easement over Outlot B. It is the City’s intent that Outlots A, B and C remain in common ownership until such time that the future development of Outlot C occurs. It is the City’s intent that at the time Outlot C is further developed, the City will at that time require the payment of park dedication fees and the dedication of all necessary and appropriate public easements within Outlots A, B and C. It is the City’s intent that proposed Lot 1 grant the standard perimeter utility and drainage easements based on the assumption that Outlot B will in the future become a roadway. Although Hennepin County Department of Public Works has requested additioiwl right-of-way for Coui ty Road 84, no additional County road right-of-way will required of the developer consistent with the standards for a collector road in the Orono Comprehensive Plan. A driveway easement over Outlot B shall be granted in favor of Lot 1 for the existing driveway in Outlot B. The single family residence existing on proposed Lot 1 requires no further variances. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above’ the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves Ae plat for Robert S. Olson and K-P Propenies Inc. at 4645 Bayside Road per the survey dated August 25, 1994, revised October 5. 1994, by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot Surveys Company Inc., subject to the following conditions; 1. Outlots A, B and C shall be subject to the following restrictions: Page 3 of 7 1 1 * I i . ........ i 2. 3. A. B C. Outlet B is platted for future roadway purposes and shall remain as a separate tax parcel until such time Outlet C is further developed. In the event that Outlet C is further developed without the need for use of Outlet B as roadway access, then Outlet B may be legally combined with an adjacent property. Outlets A, B and C shall remain in common ownership until Outlet C is further developed. Outlet A is considered as an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon development of Outlot C, Outlot A shall be either combined with Outlot B and Lot 1 if Outlot B is not used for road pturposes, or Outlot A shall be legal, y combined with Lot 1, Block 1, Bayvie-y Farms in the event that Outlot B is used for roadway purposes. D. Outlot C is created for future development only, and no building permits shall be issued for Outlot C until such time that it is replatted into one or more buildable lots. The agreement between Mr. and Mrs. Olson, Mr. and Mrs. Geffre, ai^ K-P Properties Inc. attached to this resolution as Exhibit A shall not be revised or terminated without approval of the City Council. In the event that Outlot B is used as an access road serving a fiinire development in Outlot C, the residence on Lot 1 shall revise its driveway location onto said outlot roadway and eliminate direct access to Bayside Road. 4. A driveway easement over Outlot B shall be granted in favor of Lot 1 Page 4 of 7 r The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200*. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Raymond A. Prasch of Lot Surveys Company Inc. dated August 25, 1994 revised October 5. 1994. B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" within Lot 1, such easements being 10* in width along the east and north lot lines, 10 in width along the westerly boundary adjacent to Outlot B, and 5’ in width along the southwesterly and southerly lot lines. 2. Legal documents required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies ot all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. Signed and executed driveway easement over Outlot B in favor of Lot 1. 3. Final site evaluation report, subject to approval by City. 4. Fees to be paid: A. Legal review and filing fees of $200.00 Total due: $200.00 Page 5 of 7 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held October 10, 1994. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of October 1994, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk ^ t City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 7 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1967 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 26, 1994 TO:K-P Properties, Inc. Donald R. Peterson, President 12435 42nd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 COPIES: Robert S. Olson 4645 Bayside Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 09/19/94 VOTE: 3 FOR 1 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Denial for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL COWITIONS: Planning Commission acknowledged the request to revise the ongi^ 7-loi merelv splitting off the Olson residence from the 17-acre parcel. Applicant P^videda revised sketch^indicating relocated fiiture road outlot and lot lines to eliminate the lot width ai^ setback variances The proposal lacks a continuous road outlot to the rear parcel, but rather re ^ access easement dirough the Geffre property. Applicant noted the tumng was critical in * c^lete the sale of Olson ’s residence. Planning Commission offer^ tabling or demal, a denial acting to move this on to the Council’s October 10 meeting, by which ^ to resolve the issue of Geffre’s involvement in the plat and address any other staff concerns. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: . m « « City Council, Monday, October 10, 1994; meetmg starts at 7.30 p.m. If you desite certified copies of the official Planniiig Commission mirales, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MDSUTES for SEPTEMBER 19,1994 ROLL _ pimninriCoinniissioii met on the above date with the foUowinj ^scnt Vicc4:hairPetersoi^led the mcetiDg to order approval The AfBdavh of Publication and Ceiti6^M/Mailing were noted. 1, waa moved by Peterson, secondedy^to taWe Item dWOO to the October 17. 1994 Planning Commission Meeting Ayes 4,^^ys 0. A LOT LINE REAR^GEMENT - REVISION TV ahm «A of Bdfe^ and Certificate of Mailing wetN^^. The applica-^e not presem. It was noted thm the reviaoo\^nor and not a substanti^Raiige from the previously approved layout. It wasWd by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of Item #1914 rearrangement The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. Peterson was present. r (#3) Uem #1967- D. Peterson/Geflfrc - Continued(#3) Uem #1967- U. reiersuwwt--------------- initial request was invoWuig six «. nroicct. The City ’s two primary goals Appticant's have been 1^ locations and drainfidds that would meet the 6V* slope have been to create wishes to separate the Geffre residence limit for mound systems. At this ^ t, a|^ thdr 17 5 acre parcel, so it can be sold C.d».ppto..o.. *■*« off only. b)require Park Dedication ^ setback standards of the later tins year.laicr u»» j»" • The app..c». s«bmi««.. ^vision s,..ing .he Z. The surveyor created a new ,o show .he City wha. had been sen. ou. for .he The revision changed .he 3(V setback from £ S£'“SE * - f the conceptuw nvc-.uv if they wisn lo ciosc u. four-lot revision would requite hat a 1^*^ matter is in question whether the an ouiioi wrowi wvuiw ——— Smhh asked if this woiiM be setting * ^^CTSOT^d'dis woul7cause «.™,gy approve only an oudo. wiUmu. OuUo. A deeded Gefte to be less than two acres and ^ sub-division picture. To gam first to Gefi&e. Gaf&on said ^ °%*™^^“^ouJraskiS D. Peterson why the trade of the easement that the Geffre lot P ’ this time. Peterson said this would be properties under contideration is not '>««« through, and asked STb^Sr. S* next meeting buk mem.whae. ^ only for approval the desirabiliv of having the forward to the City Couiral the County will require access m bo* ^ofS r^* Oaflfon st«ed a conceptual agreement wouk. need conditions attached to it. minutes of the ORONO planning CONMSSION meeting held on SEPTEMBER 19,1994 (#3) Item #1967 - D. Peierson/Gef&c - Continued Pctenoo moved. Smith seconded, to deny the appScalion #1967. Ayes 3-Peteison. Smith. Berg; Nays 1-Nolan. #4) «l*9S - PAT WOUE, Wt\ CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES - PUBUC HEARING The AfBdnvit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The appBcant ^ not appUcan. assumed the hem was bring tabled a, lus poor request. It was moved by Peterson. secontW by Berg, to table Item #1»95 for review at the October 17 meeting. Ayes 4, Nays 0. rrrM 4I194S FRANK KOKESH/JOAN M. HARMON, 4100 WATERWIVN SSKoi^SKsE PERMTTSIVARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING The AffidavhofPuWicationatriCerti^eofMailing were noted Gaffion noted the applicants attorney had requested tiling. It was moved by Petereon. trended by Berft to t^telb®#1948 to the October 17. 1994 meeting of the Planmng Commission. Ayes 4, Nays o. I#61 ITEM #1953 - WILLIAM ALLEN, 3475 UVINGSTCW AVENUE - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING The Affidavit of PubUcation and Certficatc of Mailing were noted. Mr. Allen was present. Itere *1953 wastritled last meeting pending r^^^^ been r«»ved. This proposal is for an adttaM between this addhion and tM 8«™8e «oul^^ t^LuiremeiTand a setback Applicam is “king for ‘««ce the property meets the 1500 sq ft allowed per code 10 03 subdivision C. IP&-' W' \ '.•- . • -;t 1 .■*^.. ' 'Tfr l \i Hennepin County A. An Equal Opportunity Employer ^ September 16, 1994 Michael P. Gaffron , Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal, MN 55323-0066 RE* Proposed Plat - Bayview Farms 2nd Addition CSAH 84, south side approximately 600 feet east of CSAH 19 Section 6, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 2179 Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Gaffron: MtnnocAta Statutes 505 02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County ?e!J"U if “h, .SS?t«ng Cointy roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: . For future Improvements along CSAH 84 as this J!*" ** Intersection, the developer should dedicate an additional 10 right of waj for a total of 40 feet of right of way from and along the CSAH 84 centerline. • The location of the proposed access road, jj??; ila^feet^west of the'^Jlits nirtheast corner. The developer "t?Sn The County entrance permit before beginning “'“^“Ssaa^for*access developer should contact Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548 for access Information and entrance permit forms. . A11 access from the plat to CSAH 84 must be via Proposed Direct driveway access to CSAH 84 will not be permitted. The existing driveway entrance for proposed Lot 1, Block 3 must be remove an for this lot be via Bayview Road. • All other proposed construction within County right requires construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact ou Section at 930-2550 for utility permit forms. Department of Public^^orl« 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 (612)930-2670 FAX;(612) 930-2513 TDD:(612) 930-2696 Recycled Paper l‘ « TO: FROM: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffwn. Asst Planning & Zoning Adminisuator DATE: September 15, 1994 SUBJECT: J1967 Robert Olson/Donald R. Petet^n of K-P Properties Inc. - 4645 Bayside ^Miminary Subdivision (Class II) - Public Heartng Applicatton: Propt»al .o split off esisting residence with 24 acres from existing 18 acre parcel. Note: Applicants original^ ^^,'’if*^!Smber Wth!tey are requeaii« to down C OllS^ p^«y as Outlot A to be planed later th.s year. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Original Letter of Request 8/26/94 C - Revised Letter of Request 91 14/94 D - Plat Map I; P^w “g for 6 Total Lots (F«~« G - Revised Plat Drawings for Creation of 1 Lot Plus r. c» sis 5- Background Staff has been working with Mr. m*cteW an additional 5 Robert Olson s 17.5 acres in «"}“«>■»"* * c^« a roadway system that will building sites. Two primary goals of tte “ „rovidina primary and alternate drainfield ,ie in wdth adjacent pro^rties in »~ The latter bas proved sites on each new lot that meet the 6 A. '",„per-s agreements with the property challenging, and is still in P'<««ss. ^ propLl to*create 4 new lots instead of "s7.o “ »1pt off Sso* Septic Sites for Olson Property Proposed primary and alternate drainf«ld sites ^ for the Olson property. While „i,h Steve Weekman during the site ,1,^. the developer ’s site evaluator has been in contact Zoning File #1967 September 15, 1994 Page 2 evaluation process. Since the Olson property currently has a faUing septic system, the primary site will be used immediately and the alternate site would remain for potential future use. Lot Standards for Existing Residence Please review the proposed single lot division. Exhibit G. In the narrow context of a single lot subdivision, this lot would require a number of variances to lot standards, i.e.: - Only 187’ of frontoge on Bayside Road. - A 30’ setback from the proposed south lot line which would be considered as a rear lot line, but which becomes a side lot line in the context of the larger subdivision. Clearly, this Mot division only makes sense in the context of the full multi-lot subdivision. Proposed Outlot A Again in the context of the single lot subdivision, the layout of Outlot A would be illogical. Howeier, it fits together in the context of the complete proposal. If Lot 1 is split off from the remainder of the Olson parcel as proposed, and Outlot Ai* created, what is the down side to the City if the future subdivision for some ** In creating Outlot A, with the very narrow neck at the southeast comer of the Geffire p pe^ and leaving 150’ of frontage on Bayside Road, the outlot would not be conf<^mg in lot wid* as all individual building site. It would certainly be appropriate that the City place specific restrictions on Outlot A, as follows; 1 Outlot A is created merely for future development, and shall not ^ ■ family residential purposes until a future plat has been approved by the City. 2. Park dedication fees will be due when Outlot A is platted for future development. 3 Any future platting of Outlot A that does not include the Geffre property must »*)clude ■ ihe^OIson property (Lot 1) to result in the Olson property becoming confomimg to the lot width, area and setback standards of the RR-IB Zonmg Distn . Proposed Future Access Location I. is the developer s imem that a new private toad be developed Hennepin County DOT that the current driveway locauon would be an p location. A ■ Zoi^g Fite #1967 September 15, 1994 Page 3 development of a road outlot. Staff Rcconunendatioii suff recommends approval only under the following conditions: I fvi-u A is created merely for ftiture developmem. and shall nm *“8'® tolly residenrial purpose umil a tore pUt has been approved by the City. 2. Park driu-tnn fees will be due when Outlot A is platted for tore development. 3 Anv tore putting of OuUot A that does not include the Oeffte property 52 ol^rSoJl.^ (Lot 1) to result in the Olson pro,^ becorn^conforming to tte STidd,.^ L setback standards of the RR-IB Zonmg Dtstnct. 4. The existing failing septic system at 4645 ^ ** * conforming system per the requirements of the City code. 5. Variances to lot width and rear setback granted for Lot 1 subject to coming into future conformance when the foil plat is completed. 6. Applicant to provide confirmation of Henn DOT access location approval. K-P PROPERTIES, INC. 12435 A2nd Ave. North PLYMOUTH, MN. 55441 August 26, 1994 Jean Mabusth Planning Director City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 I : Dccii Ms* Mabiisths E„cios.d 1, .n ih “is^p;u«t!r ‘ir Farms, which is 4645 „hi^h is buying axl of Lot 1, Bayview Farms and made by K-P Properties. J 2 Lyview Farms is joining in on this ^rpUcafifn! 1he"ea:eTope?ty"ui’h- ^He lot lines re-arranged as a result of this plat. , .. u ..lane ro the Planning Commission in June We presented two built along the joint property line of this year. One showed ^i.ernate has been abandoned because with the property to the west. the Whites who own this property. The we cannot come to on agreement wl located on the Olson property and resulting plat will use a f‘'^^i^J^chrolson's covering an 80’ by iert«ly°of lie”:; ToaS ln"-:ider'atlon for them Joining In on this plat. we will be creating J new ^“-/Llhr^eptU^sy:::^ ralu«tr:ui A Wetland delineation report is attached and the septi y be submitted under separate cover. Please place this Item on h^e'^any'^uesrior" 19, 1994 meeting. You can call me at 47b 5Ji/ 7 regarding this application. Sincerely: Donald R. Peterson, President K-P Properties, Inc. ! . ■ r*. i ■ •'a; • ii CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIViSION APPLICATION A cm OF CiWf^Q FmxCE OFFICE 1350200000^ T n 1 06-117-23 22 0008 and 0007 ,-y,w ~5d0 dOIdentification Number (P.I.D.) ------------------------------- LHtiK 7- Please check one - Property _JL_ abstract or torrens? PROPERTY LOCATION Site Mdre.s Bayside Ro^ Property 500.00 Attach legal description to application^ Lot 1 and Lot 2. Block 1, Bayvlew Farm !<ECEIPT-rim YOU ii:<l2560 cool }f01 Til:-. ^/26/ applicant ^ properties. Inc. Donald R. Peterson, President 12435 42nd Ave. No.____ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Rnhert S. Olson Phone <home) SS1-9202 «w 476-5317Phone (work) _____________ City: PiaaoutiuJBL ___ ziP- 554U Phone (home) 472-5662 Address: 4645 Bavslde Ro^---------^ (attach list it more than on«) Phone fwork) 535-1481 -------- Cl tv: Qrono. MN. _^ip , , 55323. existing land use Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) 18.62 0.88 19.50 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units —2 Other ( eporjifv) ------- Present Zoning District 8^ ^ ^ PROPOSAL _Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites. Subdivision for New Building Sites 2 _Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) flfl.427 Existing Units Mew Units Total Units Units per 1^ Acres - 0.359 u/a Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify)_______________ ( ■'. #’.. r *■■■ / "1 • • KOO rji;;w fa —MPrESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRBLIMIHARY APPLICATION MINIMUM MATERIAL 1. Completed on Certificate of Survey. . 2. Preliminary ^ist of owners within 350* <you must obtain ’• ?Sn“list lir5lL^n”ou"nlJ D%art.ent of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). aoolication, please attach a separate list of ’ • SSy“Sthe"“«TonV oF this application. certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is Tomplete. . Date _ _ ___ _ :oning Official’s Signature , « fee. sewer and water assessments). 2: c^rtiltcalrof surv;y or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. re^lTS^^r; ^?rI2:^nra^a'£etter of Credit. certification by Zoning. Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II S HD _ _ _ subdivision of a Dot Line Rearrangement _ _ _ preliminary Review (Class I S H Subdivision) ■-000^ Preliminary Review (Class III s all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class HI) . - - - *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) _ _ _ Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00 150.00 100.00 r\eiiCWC14. wa- * _ _ _ _ ___^ ——— — —— — — — — — ——- - - ThVrppIicant hereby »9tees to provide^al^l "citr'htY®* “« requested by the Zoning ' to process this application and fi^Str'agrrsVo Pa/^ll'^dit^ontl fees"established by ordinance. K-P Pro£erties, Applicant's Signature owner's Signature erson* President Date Date snem 8nei9i* Owner's Signature ^ a:-,.*, 4-heRobert S,, Olson . offices 25 days before cne Applicant must have all suWtMls into the^S-H, m...tnos are held on the Planning ^*^^th' Applicants must be present at all Office of this change prior to th^meeting. , K’P Properties, Inc. 12435 42nd Ave. North Plymouth, MN. 55441 Phone 476-5317 September 14. 1994 Jean Mabusth Planning Director City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN. 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: On Auaust 26 1994 K-P Properties. Inc. applied for a prelimlnanr Sat tor subdlvi^^^^ 4645 and 4665 Bayside Road in Orono. We have been working to obtain roadway to serve this property obtain septic sites which will meet Orono's r^uirments or r^ronArtv It aoDoars that a 6 lot division which creates 5 new ol^n property. 4645 Bayside. will no. allow adequate septic sites. A revision of the subdivision to provide 4 new building fAa«ibie The owners of 4645 Bayside Road have purchas^ anothe home and have a buyer who wants to purchase their In order to accomodate that sale we are requesti 9 division preliminary plat application o foHhe of Lot 1. Block 1. Bayview Farms. This win proviae o house which will allow the house to be sold. We will retain an easement for access to the which will be dedicated to Orono if the future P‘® « Road. remaining property requires a 'W' 4^5 Bayside We are negotiating for a road which would be but this may take several months. Enclosed Is a lot survey showing a 1. Bat^de Farms into 2 lots. The location of the possible roadway would be the the area shown as easement. iPATC Oe/25/9«i'.-k--si 0««117>25 21 0005 04505 MYSIDE RO RU S RENNEBONH RfTER 0 SHARON RENNEBONH 45«S BAYBIDE ROAD IttfLE RUIN m 55S59 «R NAME JWPAYER : E/ADORIm■"il ■ .>4a I '■?*AOOR : _ _ R NAME ft'-r ^ •• SA» 0«-117-tS 22 0006 04045 OAYSXOE RO R'S A N R OLSON ROBERT S OLSON MlO HILLSBORO AVE NNRLS m 5542B ■f’.' • -[f.. - si S1-11B-2S 5S 0005 64«00 BAYSIOE RO BON curr BdM»E i NEVA CUFF 40ER BAYSIOE RO NARLE plain HN 55559 SB' S1*UB>2S SS 0009 ooosa Aooress unassigneo PAINTERS CREEK HOHEO»«4ERS RAXNTERS,CREEK H0ME0I4IERS CA) CRAIO PASSOM Ido LUCE LINE R106E MAPLE plain HN 55559 HE»MEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFWERS LISTSB 00-117-2S 22 0003 OOIBO NORTH SHORE DR N DAVID L WHITE ET AL FREDERICK C WHITE 14195 PAULS DR ROGERS m 55374SB 04-117-23 23 0001 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO JEANNE T ARMSTRONG JEAN T ARMSTRONG 235 NORTH ARM LANE MOUND m 55344 SB 31-116-23 33 0004 04720 BAYSIOE RO B PETER ACHEY ETAL HR B PETER ACHEY ROUTE 2 BOX 68B MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-116-23 S3 0010 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO IRVIN E BERGSAGEL ET AL QUARTO INC 1624 HARMON PL 0209 MPLS HN 55403 r M I dr iSh •/- SB Sl-lie-23 34 0003 t oodts lOcC line rzoge C^NAME '^ c fl MATTSTROH OVA HATTSTROM IVCR owns H MATTSTROH E/AOOH ts Luce Lxni ridge .r.'HAPU PLAIN m 55359 • •• ■h i ■ ,0. ’'A':'-' Xi ‘ 4. J c . ■t u, - - ,-i ; . f 'i- » rS*.» ,.v • \1\'' *^f>-. ..m- ••• * u’ * j I. 'ir • » *>• TOTAL BATCH 004 OOOlS REPORT NO. PI43540I PAGE 15 - . : . f •. A ... f}'38 04-117-25 22 0007 04645 BAYSIOE RO 1 T ■ H L GEFFRE IRVIN T GEFFRE 4665 BAYSIOE RO MAPLE PLAIN »M 5555936 04-tl7-2i 24 000100215 NORTH ARH LA JEANNE T ARMSTRONG JEAN T ARMSTRONG 235 NORTH ARM LANE HOUND m 5^544 36 31-110-25 33 0007 04740 BAYSIOE RO L YQGERST A 0 DUNN 0 DUNN A L YOCERST 4740 BAYSIOE OO HAPLE PLAIN M4 55359 58 31-11S-2S 53 0011 OOOSB AOORESS UNASSIGNEO B R LANGE A J B BURRELL * BrtUCE R LANGE SUITE 415 53 H JACKSON BLVD CHICAGO XL 60404 S ■'iiK'f•> . • . 4:v-:5i^'v‘v) -i.,~}: .1 yt' . *;■^‘;r i -..7\• «L S; •I • : . ■ '..: v -x' '^fv; ;X- • : • V V. • - fr V V •4 \ V ' 'tir** I ' t k ■. ’ '5 * ' * • 7^ 1 O /Td ■ : • ?'■ ' * , • ' k . -T %t j,; ■ :4v * •*, , • <* • •% *.4 i-V^Pi ; - Ti'« » *• V *» - t •*>:v * 4 '9 •• • •,v?: •s‘M ■vr:, \ ». ••*» •'* i •i*4 . ••1 r l/l Bonestroo Rosene Andcrlik & |\|| Associates Engineers & Architects September 9, 1994 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: K-P Properties File No. 139-1967 Dear Mike, Bonestroa fi^iene. Ancterttk and Assockxei fnc a an Affim^atry^ Acoon^quaf Oppoftuniry €mpk^ Ono G Bonesiroa PE Bofcett W Rosene PE * Joseph C PC Marvin L ixvaia P€ R<hard £ Turner P£ Genn E Cook PE Thomas E No>es ^'E BoOert G Schun<ru PE Susan M £Den<n. CPA •Senior Consu4ar»f HOMVJSdA Sinibrd PE Ke*n A GotOon. P£ Booert B PWiehe PE Bicharc? W Pcttpr PE David O Loikoca PE Booed C Busset A i A jerry A BourOOO P£ Mark A Hanson PE M<haei T Rautmann P£ Ted A Field PE Thomas B Anderson. A IA Oonaid C Bunjardt PE Thomas A Sy^ PE FTder< J StfnOor^ PE 'smaet Madine** **E V^fsaef P Rau. PE A^M AiCP Trx^nas W ^tenon P€ M<naei C L/nch. PE James B MMxl PE Jerry O ^^trsch P£ Seed J Ai^anek. PE Kenreth P Anderson PE Mart B tofV PE Mark A Snp PE Gary W Mor«n PE Paul J Ganrson A / A Dan«4 J Edgerton PE A B<k SchmOL PE P*' ro J Caswve' PE MarkO VUakv PE Mies B Jensm PE L PhJ^) Grjvet PE iCam L W«men, PE Gary O Knstchez. PE AeAfs B vaoa PE Douglas J Senoc PE Shjwvn O Gustafson PC Cecito CHnner. PE Paul G Hewer PE x»hn P Gorder. PE Charles A Enckson Leo M PAk^Sfcy Harlan M Otson ;ames F ErxjciharTjt . V. We have reviewed the preliminary plat and grading plan submitted by K-P Properties, Inc. for ^;v,:wFTr2n.i Action. Z’^propcnyls Iccaied south of Ba^ m/ Rds find ca^i of C S A H No. 19 in the northwest quarter of Section 6. The proposed acc^ Road appear to be adequate, however. Hennepin County should review the oTans -^e Z “g of a fuwre connection to the adjacent property to the south and west s horisontai street alignments a« acceptable do not appear to meet a 30 MPH design speed as required by C ty C^e The acceptable length for each of the three vertical curves arc 160, 110 and 180 res^ciwciy. S m t^north and moving south. A typical section for the submitted that shows a minimum paved width of 28 feet and a sec 100% crushed aggregate base and 3-inches of bituminous pavement. The grading plan seems to indicate that an urban section ™rS^section roa^ay *is case, a drainage plan should be submitted to address the runoff. proposed, the diHies should he at least 2-feet below the edge of the roadway. The grading plan does not show grading of the cul-de-sac nor does it or erosion control. Silt fence should be installed along the Drainage easements should be shown on any wetland areas and District routes.^The plans should be submitted for review by the Minnehaha Creek Wa Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MIM 55113 • 612-636-46< • A .• V r 5 l' **« % Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator ^ Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator October 18. 1994 ^ #1965 James Lear/Gustafson Design, 2525 Dunwoody Avenue - Variance AjP - Resolution Application: Request for variance and conditional use permit to construct retaining walls in lakeshore yard to repair a failing lakeshore bank. Zoning District: LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1/2 Acre List of Exhibits . . * . m/io/oaA - Notice of Planning Commission Action 10/18/94 B - Planting Schedule and Plan Submined 10/17/94 C - Resolution D - Memo and Exhibits of 10/14/94 Discussion has a faiiing iakeshore bank which is in need of repair and preventive action^ The prop«ai is for a series of reuining wails, shoreline nprapping, and an extensive replanting plan to assist in erosion control as well as screemng. The City Engineer has reviewed and approved the detailed retaining wall plan, applicamhas stably addressed the Engineers concerns regarding stability of the wall and the slopes. The project will increase hardcover from 2.5% to 5.5% in the 0-75 ’ zone^ of this is due to the nanire of the wall material. An existing short Lmain be relocated slightly northward, and the existing 43 s.f. storage shed will remain. and ubied for additional information. That information was sul^ueni V P™ Commission recommended approval at their October 17 meeting on a vole ot 7 to 0. ^^^oi^^s approval per the Planning Commission recommendation and per the findings and conditions of the attached resolution. Proposed Motion Moved by , seconded by , to adopt Resolution No . granting a conditiori u” ^rSiuTnd variance to “25 Dunw^^ of retaining walls and associated hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. Vote. ------ ayes nays CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1%S NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: October 19, 1994 TO:James Lear 2525 Dunwoody Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: Gustafson Design 1845 Wisconsin Avenue North Golden Valley. MN 55427 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 10/17/94 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Appropriate erosion control methods to be used during and after construction 2. Completion of planting (per submitted plan) as soon as weather permits after construction. 3.A representative of the retaining wall design firm (American Engineering Testing, Inc.) be on site during construction to observe conditions. 4. Adhere to plans as proposed 5. Applicant is advised that the 43 s.f. existing shed is subject to code requirements which prohibit its replacement when deteriorated. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council. Monday, October 24, 1994; meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission miriutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. r V 'kT)_• ^ I*;*.5' V ', : ■•• •* '•' 5/C«»»T«ii»««Oog»*oo<» MaoopMi An* Trw S/Shiberi SpirH Se*)«: 1 bsh * 10 *■** Otusbtr t4.19»4 J V Ex. Oik A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2, SECTION .0.«,-o™ and granting a conditional use permit PER section 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE NO. 1965 WHEREAS. James Lear (hereinafter the "applicam") is ow«r of the p^^ located at 2525 Dunwoody Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter City ) an g y described as follows: Lot 9. Block 8, Townsite of Langdon Park, Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to pemit SaS^ha^rr in S o“lr; setback zone, and a variance to SecUon 10.^ SuMivision 16 (C) to allow letaining walls which are a conditional use permit for lakeshore alterations per Section 10. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File ^1965. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Ukeshore Residential Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on wall system and stairs based on the followmg findmgs. Page 1 of 5 i. The property currently contains an existing deteriorating retaining wall system and stairway at the lakeshore. t) The existing retaining walls are located within 30’ of the shoreline but do not extend the ftill width of the property. The shoreline bank extends approximately 18 ’ above lake level, and is exhibiting slump failure. c. The proposed retaining wall system designed by American Engineering Testing, Inc. has been appiovcd by the City Engineer from an engineering standpoint. d. The existing retaining wall system/stairway hardcover including a 43 s.f. existing shed is approximately 2.5%. The proposed retaining wall system/stairway/shed will comprise approximately 5.5% hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone. The majority of 0-75 ’ hardcover is the retaining wall system. e. The applicant has provided a suitable planting and revegetation plan which compensates for the necessary removal of existing juniper type vegetation along the lakeshore bank, which will be removed in order to facUitate the retaining wall project. Further, the planting plan provides sufficient varieties and quantities of shrubbery to provide adequate screening to the new retaining wall system. f Planning Commission finds that approval should appropriately be conditioned on proper erosion controls, appropriate vegetation screening, and a finite time period for completion of the project to minimize erosion potential. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely sc^e as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial proj^rty ri^t of me applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zomng Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow construction of a retaining wall system and stair replacement will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the propos^ level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2, 10.55, Subdivision 8, and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow hardcover in the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone of 5.5% where no hardcover is normally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (5) to allow construction of retaining walls where they are normally prohibited in the shore setback zone, and grants the conditional use permit required for lakeshore alterations per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. Hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone shall not exceed 5.5% (513 s.f.), and construction shall adhere to the approved design by American Engineering Testing, Inc. and the site plan and planting schedule attached as Exhibit A. Applicant shall obtain the necessary land alteration permit prior to construction. Further, applicants shall obtain tK appropriate Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit for riprap at the shoreline prior to riprapping. Propc erosion control procedures shall be established and maintained during construction activity in accord with MPCA’s "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water (^ality in Urban Areas", and in accord with the provisions of Orono ShoreUnd Regulations, Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (J)- In order to minimize the period during which the shorelitie is disrupted, the retaining wall system construction shall continue to completion without delay once construction has commenced. Completion of plantings per Exhibit A shall be completed as soon as weather permits after retaining wall construction. Page 3 of 5 6. 8 A representative of the reulning wall design firm (American Engineering Testing, Inc.) shall be on site during construction to observe conditions. Authorities granted by this r jsolution run with the property not with the owners, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (Octoter 24, 1995). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behali of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution iii :hc chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of October, 1994. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrumenl was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of October, 1994, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of___ ss. , 199 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared_________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he Tthey) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public I STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Ontliis day of___ ss. , 199 __, before me a Notary Public within and for sa id County, personal ly appeared __________________________—^---------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, a acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 To:Chairman Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator October 14, 1994 #1965 James Lear/Gustafson Design. Inc., 2525 Dunwoody Avenue Conditional Use Permit/Variance -Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits i II Gustafson Design - Letter 10/13/94 City Engineer Review - 10/11/94 Retaining Wall Design by AET, Inc. Hardcover Calculations Planning Commission Action Notice 9/22/94 Planning Conunission Minutes 9/19/94 DNR Letter 9/27/94 Memo and Exhibits of 9/16/94 Discussion This item was tabled at your September 19 meeting pending receipt of a wail design acceptable to the City Engineer and hardcover calculations. Applicant was advised to have his engineer contact the City Engineer, which has been done. Applicant has submitted a design that the City Engineer finds acceptable. Proposed Design Referring to Exhibit B, the design incorporates natural flat stone and layers of "geo-grid" to provide stability to the disturbed soil areas. There will be drain tile behind each wall, and the wall heights range from T to 8’. An integral part of the design is installation of riprap at the shoreline. Where terraces between walls are generally flat, there would appear to be opportunities for significant planting of shrubbery to help soften the visual impact. The designer, Donovan K. Stormoe. P.E., indicates that an experienced soils engineer or technician from AET should be on site during construction to observe conditions. The City Engineer notes that the 2.5:1 slopes would be difficult to mow. In response, applicant has indicated the slopes will not be mowed, and his letter notes the areas will be protected with erosion mat and mulch. Applicants ’ letter also indicates the plantings intended to be installed to help soften the visual impact of the wall system. Remember that this bank protection project will likely require removal of a majority of the mature juniper type trees at the shoreline. Zoning File H965 October 13, 1994 Page 2 Applicant has also provided hardcover calculations indicating that the boulder walls will increase hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone from 2.5% to 5.5%. Other than the walls, the only other 0-75 ’ hardcover items are a 40 s.f. set of steps leading to the dock, and a 43 s.f. storage shed for storage of lake-related equipment. Note that the DNR has recommended conditional approval of this project (see Exhibit G). Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and variances for grading in the 0-75 ’ zone to protect this lakeshore bank, and the associated hardcover variance subject to adherence to appropriate erosion control methods during and after construction and subject to completion of plantings as soon as weather permits after constniction. A further appropriate condition would be that a representotive of American Engineering Testing, Inc. be on site during construction to observe conditions, as was recommended in the design report. Options for Action 1. Rcconunend approval per the staff recommendation, 2. Table, requesting additional information. 3. Recommend denial, stating specific reasons. 4.Other. ■ ~J -C> i gustafson design, inc. K a * at —. •. October 13,1994 Mr. Mike Qaffron Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 00 Crystal Bay. MN 56323>0066 Dear Mr. Gaffron: In reference to the Lear application, we have planned the following landscape for the entire bank and wall areas: • The lower wall areas will be planted with evergreens and hedges so as to hide the entire wall surface after a modest amount of growth. • The upper walls and sloped areas will have a combination of specimen shrubs and evergreens, and the balance of the area will be planted with masses of perennial flowers. • The entire work area will have the soil covered with a Celslor erosion mat and a thick layer of wood fiber mulch with netting pinned over the surface In the sloped areas. There will be no seeding, and any sod on slopes will be staked to prevent erosion. The proposed plans will more than compensate for any removal necessary to complete the wall work on the site. I will provide you a transparency of the landscape planting plan for the Monday meeting to use (if needed) to answer questions on the extent of the planting plan. Thank you for your help with this request. Sincerely, Dale A. Gustafson 1 84S Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden vaiiev, mn 55427 tei (612) 644-4216 Bonestroo RDsene Anderlik& Associates Ei^fnMrs & Architects October 11, 1994 Otio G BonestfOQ PE ftohen W Uotene PE • joieph C Andert* PE Mjrvm i Stxvatj. PE RchaitJ E Turner. PE Gimn P Coot. PE Thomji E Noy«\ PE RohetT G ^hunchL PE Suvjn M Et)efiei. C PA •SeoKX ConsuR^nf HoM^afO A Saniord PE iceeh A Gordon. PE Hooen P PE PicMid W Potter PE David O LosiDCj PE Rooert C Puiiek. A Jerry A Bourdon PE Mart A Hjnson. PE Mchaei T Rautmarm. PE Ted P P«4d PE Thomas R AnderV)n. A J A Dorsaid C Buigaidt PE Thomai A Syfha PE Fiedenc J SterrOOtg. PE lynaet Martmea. PE Mchae* P Bau PE Agnes M Ring. AiC P Thomas W Rmnon. PE Mchael C lynctv PE James P Maiand PE Jerry D f^rinch. PE Scott J Aiganet. PE Kenneth P Anderson. PE ERarfe P Me PE Mark A Se«L PE Gary W Monen PE Paul J Cannon A i A Dartei J Edgertorv PE A P<k SchmeJt PE Phtf) J CaskveR. PE Mart O PE Miles B Jemen PE L Ph*^ Crawei PE Kaien i SVcmen PE Gvy D moPlL PE f ladd PosHf. PE Mh t TM PE Oougtas J Berwt. PE SnjMvnO Guttalion. PE Cec*o OiM*r PE Pmm G Meuer. PE John P GorOh PE Charles A Enctson leoM Paw«tsty Harlan M Otson James f EngeRsam Mr. Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 ^ Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Lear Residence File No. 139-1965 Dear Mike, We have reviewed the report prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. for the proposed retaining walls and riprap along the shoreline of Spring Park Bay on the Lear residence at 2525 Dunwoody Avenue. The most recent plans for the retaining wall system are acceptable from an engineering standpoint. However, the plans show a dope of 1 and we would recommend a maximum slope of 3 to 1 (horizontal to vertical), ^e steeper slopes will be difficult to maintain and would represent a high potential for erosion until a suitable ground cover has been established. Unless the grading is modified, the applicant should provide more information about the type of ground cover proposed and whether or not the slopes will be mowed. If seeding is proposed, we recommend an erosion control blanket be used for the steep slope areas. Prior to starting the work, silt fence should be installed along the shoreline for erosion control. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MIM 55113 • 612-636-4 A AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. CONSULTANTS • GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • environmental October 11, 1994 Mr. Dale Gustafson Gustafson Design, Inc. 1845 Wisconsin Avenue North Golden Valley, MN 55427 RE: Walls and Shore Protection Recotmnendations Lear Residence 2525 Dunwoody Avenue Orono, Minnesota AET m-1943 Dear Mr. Gustafson: This reoort our opinions and recommendations concerning desi^ and September 16, 1994. by you. the project N^shore on the attached copy of a plan drawing you ftimisned to us. The proposed reaining walls consist of stOK factng *'* ^^ised facing. WaU height wiU be a maximum of ^ ^^in»-aone with dimensions for the wall ^^ de^ (from front to back of being). The S^^ares-n«;Jd achieved bytom^g the stone, so there is moderate roughness to the stone surfaces. Lake shore protection on your project site currently of large up to about 12- in diameter. Typical shore f ^^f^^'T^Tbould^ (up to 4' in diameter) irregular field stone We understand Urend from 4' to 5' above the present 'f these adjacent shore protection nprap systems have been m pla« tor y L site visit, it appeared those adjacent riprap systems were m excellent condition. • an AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLO^y r 1 ¥ Mr. Dale Gustafson October 11, 1994 Page 2 During our site visit, we also noted an area along the present rear yard slope where an earth apparently did not move is about 6". do not include specific layout features of the wall or system, such as railings to reduce die possibility of petHns falling from the walls. In addition, our services do not include evaluation of surface water drainage and erosion protection design of slope surfaces. GEOTECHNTCAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS . • , j u ^ n • « Jtf.TT.c- Geotechnical aspects of your project which we have considered include the fo owmg A lake fetch of nearly two miles from the southwest with maximum wave heights estimated at 4'. • Ice sheet fotmation of several feet in thickness on the lake during winter and early spring. Basic firm clayey glacial Ull natural soil with a thin veneer of topsoil and local areas of soft organic soils and peat near the existing lake shore. Earth slope faUute along the bank above the shoreline about midway between the not* and south property lines. Possible local perched water conditions in the slow draining clay n*i r«* sods above lake level. Clay soils .vubiccr to heaving when frozen. line wi* new riptap. Considering *e potential wave and tee action, we smaller boulders similar to the adjacent properties. In addition to *e large cobbles and boulders should be placed behind *e large boulders “ between riprap pieces resting directly on *e shore. A geotextile filter fabnc should be placed r Mr. Dale Gustafson October 11. 1994 Page 3 on the fine grained shore materials prior to placing the riprap. This filter layer is attended to For this tvoe of wall system, several conditions must be evaluated to determine the wall system geometr^required so adequate lateral support is attained. Those conditions and mmimum factors of safety we have considered are as follows: Bearing Capacity FaUure - Safety Factor = 2.0 Base Sliding - Safety Factor — 1.5 • Wall Overturning - Safety Factor — 2.0 Overall Slope Failure - Safety Factor 1.5 Geogrid Overstress - Safety Factor — 1.2 Geogrid Pullout - Safety Factor = 1.5 Your proposed wall system has three general geometrical cross-sections. Walls separated by relatively large distance with a slope upward away from the lower wall of 2.5:1 to 3:1 (horizontal:vertical). Up to four terraced walls at spacings of as little as about 6 elLation away from the shoreline of about 2.5:1 (honzontahvenical). with backfill between individual walls relatively level. Two-tiered wall system with relatively level grades between and above the walls. Adequate bearing capacity of the wall system will require replacement witll the area of *e walls. This includes all soil materials which shifted “ “ slope faUure several years ago. For access to the planned ex^g trees and shrubs along the shoreline will have to should be grubbed and cleared from the area. We tecotmne^ T areas by an experienced soils engineer or technician prior to fill placement. Supporting earth materials beneath the wall system must be comV'e* fiU- The fill material should preferably be fine gravel with a maxunum largest 1 imcaLjit. r Mr. Dale Gustafson October 11, 1994 Page 4 particle size of 2" and no more than 50% material finer than a #4 sieve or 3% finer than a #200 sieve This type of material is free draining, exhibits very little shifting whei. frozen, and is easier to compact in confined spaces such as expected at this project site. We recommend placing the granular fill in lifts no more than 6" in thickness with vibratory compacuon of each lift Care should be taken in choosing compaction equipment which has sufficient energy for effective compaction yet does not have excessive energy or weight to cause significant shifting of the wall facing stones during the gravel compaction process. A porous geotextile separauon fabric is recommended to separate the gravel fill from fine grained native soils at surfaces where seepage from the soil into the gravel can be expected. This includes beneath the topsoil layer placed over the gravel. Our computations indicate the critical, or governing, factor for wall stability is lateral sliding of the reuining wall base. In order to attain the minimum recommended factor of safety, we recommend the following minimum depth (distance back from the back of the facmg stone) of geogrid-reinforced gravel. WaU Height (ft.) Depth of Reinforced Backfill Zone (ft.) Level Slope Behind WaO 2.5:1 Maximum Slope Behind Wall 2 2.6 3.4 4 4.5 6.8 6 6.8 10.1 8 8.9 - For wall heights between those listed above, you can interpolate in direct proportion to amve at fninimum reinforced backfill zone depths. We recommend using a geogrid at least equal to the specifications of Tensar UX1500 (SR-^ uniaxial material for slope reinforcement. For at least some fastenmg of the face stone to me reinforced backfill, we recommend extending me geogrid 8" to 9" mto me stone cou^ j at the geogrid layer level. You should realize this connection relies only on me mcuoi^ resistance of movement between me stone and geogrid material. Thus, care should be t^en when moving equipment or heavy objects near me facing stone, so me stone is not s e damaged. r Mr. Dale Gustafson October 11, 1994 Page 5 The geogrids should be installed such that the along-the-roll-length direction is perpendicular to the wall face. Care should be taken to prevent wrinkles or slack in the geogrid layers. The amount of face movement or bulging is dependent on minimizing the slack. To minimize slack, we recommend that the geogrid be pretensioned prior to backfilling. Pretensioning typically consists of layering the geogrid flat, pulling band taut, anchoring with a two-prong metal fork, and then placing backfill material on top. Good drainage of tlie wall backfill is important for wall stability. We recommend a minimum 4" draintile in the gravel backfill as you have shown on year plans furnished to us. Typical section details we recommend are attached. Our design recommendations are based on certain assumptions regarding existing soil conditions. In order to verify our assumptions, we recommend that an experienced soils engineer or technician from AET be on site during construction to observe conditions. As a minimum, the engineer should observe base excavations, backfilling procedures, and geogrid Installation. If you anticipate changes from our recommendations, please contact us so we can review the impact of those changes on our recommendations for this wall system. Report Prepared By:Report Reviewed By: ■iiio Donovan K. Stormoe, PE Principal MN Reg. #10493 Jamie^ C. Rudd, PE :ipal Engineer James Priddii I herc'by cartify that Ihfs p(an,.epcdiici:t!s:^, er repoa was preparEd by mo or under my tuo«vis!su dnd tfcaf I aco u <tuJy R.-:c‘strr<id DKS/JCR/sm Attachments Prcv«sstcnai Engineer oncisr O'. ‘W " he Stcio K<StOmCB ROg. No. 10403 1 I . Ci6d9^ 9AO DEPTH VARiES WITH\ WP^LL HEIGHT \ (SEE R<!-') \ Q35*reinforced BACKFfLL 'EONE \ DRAINT/LE COMP ACTE D 6,RA VEL i TYR') 6>EOTE X TILE FILTER FABRIC. SECTION I SUBJECT: RETAINING WALLS AND SHORE PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS PROJECT:LEAR RESIDENCE ORONO, MINNESOTA 4AMERICAN ENGIilEERING TESTING, INC C0N9ULTAKI« • GforrcaojiciL • MATCRUI3 • CNflROHlfCHrit JOD // 94-1943 DATE: 10/11/94 BY; DKS PAGE 1 OF 3 CHECKED BY: JCR Q60Q4S WALL BATTEM 940 V2'A7AX. VERTICAL SFACtNS FOR Ld EOC^RID 935- Jkt 4 REINFORCE D BACKFILL Y.ONE CDEPTH VAR/E'^- ZFE ^ 1123 SRAVEL BASE.I OEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC RIP RAP 5ECTION Z SUBJECT: RETAINING WALLS AND SHORE PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS PROJECT: " Lear j^esidence ORONO, MINNESOTA AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC C0N9UUAHTS • OlOltaMCiL • y&muij • CNflROVlfCNrAI JOD If 94-1943 DATE: 10/11/94 BY: DKS PAGE 2 OF 3 CHECKED BY: JCR 1 * , , ^-----rrr 95D94.S 99-0 936T /O^ BATTtR (TYRI RIP RAP f iji REINFORCED BACKFILL ZONE. CEOBRUD TOPSOIL. MIN. MAX. (TYR) Z,EOTEXT/LE FABRIC y7ZZZ2^2z!^ ORAINIILE iTYR) CEO T£l X TILE FILTER FABLIC DEPTH VARIES WITH WALL HEIBH'T (TY P. - SEE SCHEDULE ON R^') 5ECT/DN 3 SUBJECT: RETAINING WALLS AND SHORE PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS PROJECT:LEAR RESIDENCE ORONO, MINNESOTA A AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC CONSULTAHia • CIOTIClMCiL • utnauia • eHTUOllUCHTU JOD it 94-1943 DATE:BY: 10/11/94 DKS PAGE CHECKED BY: 3 OP 3 JCR .*3.« HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House length WIDTH B. Garage c. Driveway _ X S4<-p 1 /O D. Sidewalk- - - - - -- x S'fo'TtfS'- X E.Patio/Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING V30 I G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. iO S.F. S.F. V3 S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 'i5b S.F. S.F. ^/3 S • F •_A_ ^37^ s.F. 100 = .% • • ri - - A • HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET , n-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000'SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) U / Existing H ardcover _in _Zone s ■ _____ S.F. A. H ouse . X length WIDTH Bt Garage c. Driveway _ X D. Sidewalk f.f E. Patio / Deck _ X F.Landscape AREAS underlain BY plastic £> / G. Other Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F S.F. S.F. S • F t V5 _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F /Ss S.F S.F S.F Z 2. '7 S.F. S.F & ____-lFTI X100 2.^2 % ......* e t: r i 3 ' CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE n965 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMNflSSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 22, 1994 TO:James Lear 2525 Dunwoody Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: Gustafson Design 1845 Wisconsin Avenue North Golden Valley, MN 55427 Shawn Gustafson Bonestroo & Associates 2335 Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 0 AGAINST TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 09/19/94 VOTE: 4 FOR The Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant to provide hardcover inventory pertaining to the retaining walls and 0-15' zone. 2. Applicant’s enghieer to contact City Engineer (Shawn Gustafson, Bonestroo & Associates 636-4600) and work out a muuially acceptable design. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the October 17 meeting is October 7. You will be notified by mail of the meeting date and time. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, *e^are available from the City Cleric after review and approval by the Planning Commission. “^?SSoNsSS°.“‘!5Sf"‘ ,.„, n™«»4 . CA1.VAKV MEMOl^CmmCH. !«0 Mm.OOI>V HEARING The Affidavit of Ihi^o" “d Certificate of MaUngvierrioted. AppUcant, Glenn HeinacV-tan. Pastor o^ Memorial Church, was present. variances fc,» proposed signage. Applicant Gafifron stated the the inside, 8’x8' in size on an 11' brick wall, is asking to install a ”«* i„ a residemial area. This sign along wffi A condhional-use permit is e^ ^ would exceed the the two other ft “ proposed), site si^e pade(9-instra*Mthe8-allowed). Hehrscj^rohoclisdependento^^^^^^^ ^ Character. j^^^^ano^Kolan seconded, to approved Item 111964 as presenied. Ayes 4 hearing The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Applicant. James Lear, and Dale Gustafson of Gustafson Design were present. Gaffion stated the reguest is for a variance retaining walls in lakeshore yard to c«Pa“ ® „o, reviewed the newly submhtrf away. City Engineer reviewed t he f P' „ ^ ^ g is a history of problems with plan The Engineer is concerned with bould«^ Lear does not wish for Uiis type failing. The plan is not detailed nor is n SP providing the same keysi^type waUs. preferring aand Legrity of his home and the hardcover calculations. Peterson moved, Berg seconoe Ayes 4, Nays 0. I ................it-. 1^ STATE OFXdepartment of natural resources MMRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, HN SSlOj^^ PHONENO. 772-7910 HFCEiVED 'SEP 2 9 199^ September 27, 1994 gc OHONO » •:Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. BOX 66 ccnonCrystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE land use applications, CITX of orono, HENNEPIN COUNTV Dear Mr. Gaffron: I have comments on the following land use applications. p,t WonO, ^S71 CT^co PO^ reqTiests reconstruct^ of a shed. DNR Metro lake the ci“ deny the variance requests as they arHurrently proposed. There ^ „r/lso “°^^^t^:n^w\^Ve°r b^r^dship exists. #^965. Gustafson., nesiqn on ^^ppi i nanfc requests f27-n3~ll. spring variance for grading and approval of a conditiona , ^ • .^j. 0-75' lakeshore setback, construction problem and that a we understand that there do not object to the replacement wall of some typ ^ location as long as: the city approving >^®taining wall f • fg\\icturally sound and willcity engineer agrees that the design existing trees and i?tr?hfru?4s^s? ^ \ o“rco'=n*’d%ions for not reguiringj a permit. , -jcrt ftsivside Road. 05—1X7 23. #1968. Keith and Vivian Banqert_^ —The applicants request several on^S. (27-133-23. ^ ^ and single family variances for construction __-„-,nends that the city deny the residence. DNR Metro Waters In particular, variance requests as they ^-i^gway^ off of CR 84 (Bayside we are concerned about the -gble fading and vegetation Road) which would require und^standing that even if removal on a bluff. -^igns to the existing bluff were the proposed extensive a marginal access based onallowed, the applicants would still have a y AN equal opportunity employer ! i Mr. Mike Gaffron September 27, 1994 Page 2 . safety standards. We recommend that the applicants e^lore the^ possibility of obtaining an easement for an alternate access alignment. Hr-iS The Department should be pi« and forwa%ed to this office if the variance requests SrSot^Senied P?S!se contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist CCS/cds Lake Minnetonka files 27-133-11 and 27-133-23c: '.-frr-T—^lAnh'-aac— TO:Chainnan Schroeder and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: September 16, 1994 SUBJECT: #1965 James Lear, 2525 Dunwoody Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Application: Request'for variance and conditional use permit to construct retaining walls in lakeshore yard to repair a failing lakeshore bank. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Topography Map F - Sketch of Proposed Walls G - City Engineer ’s Comments H - Revised Plan (Rev’d 9/16/94) I - Cross Sections (Reev’d 9/16/94) J - Letters of Transmittal (Rev’d 9/16/94) Discussion Applicant is Gusufson Design on behalf of James Lear, the property 7“^• a lakeshore bank rising approximately 20 ’ above the lake with a slope of around 50%. The bank is starting to experience a slump problem on the northerly half of the property. The applicant initially provided only a conceptual sketch for a wall system. City Eng^er Shawn Gustafson requested much additional detail which was not submitted until midday on Friday, September 16th. Gustafson has not had a chance to comment in anting, but his indication to me at 1:15 p.m. today was that while the additional material provided ‘s telpfol, it ooes not appear to be an engineered designed, it appears to be a boulder wall, and he has severe reservations about recommending approval for boulder walls. The proposal does not provide any detail as to the amount of hardcover that will be added by the walls. A hardcover calculation should also be provided. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends tabling this item until the information submitted to the City reviewed and found acceptable by the Engineer. Planning Commission may want t g applicant conceptual direction in regards to the project. 1 i j • i : i i i #iag.3CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION TypeAppnrafinnmbeFiled C^.OAdt4\<0wtl Tg>f t-L^virl /QltW^^7 Prnnertv Identification Number (P.I.D.) il“1 --------------------- >v\ applican / r Name* ^a*=5fQTS0^ Phone (home) ------------ Address ____ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone ^ome)_^7i:i_ M.m. cC77^ U. ^ ^ ---------FT—(work)I3II^ Address YV'TOxA .o Phone (home) ^7 f "'7^/0 • ^ ' ^ ' 75. ZA Zip Date Property Acquired______-------------------------------------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request witfi CUP application 5125.00 Residential Accessory Use 5200.00 Instimtional (church, school, etc.) 5175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments 5150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ~ S250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use •• V S200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore '^PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) ____Afier-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____S200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____S250.00 Vacation _____$175.00 Easement Vacation S 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _______$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY. . , Present Zoning District Present Use of Property ^ Residential Other (specify). (month/year) CITY OF OROHQ FmRCt OFFICE 1350200000 .w rrki TvV» 'VUUlf iLVV»VV ruTi* Ti vnM nrLtii LA IL i. vv' • vv vCYTTOT-TUAWIi* VTi/i liuiLitt titnrix » u*u •OAf Tij I I a 1 *« «• • •• • r'jC' / ■.* i V'U*/ ^312540 cool 2. 3. 4. 5. f«'®^SS^ca.ionFonn. ; SS3.“;'="S-SSi.i;2S.i5.“£?r - ce^Mte of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. . a«r,lication if not included on required survey. - T^o^^Uc survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve ' ?'^o?th^ SmLfa^clude marital sams) of all persons with an interest in the - n Llty •ms would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). " you wish notified of this application. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. --------- YOU ARE TO SOTPLY 30 DOCmffi!^ O^OTY (S-ouire to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) 2’“s. ssu— Cenlf,cation by Clerical Department that Und Use Applicarion is complete Initios of Clerical Staff i__________________ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE formation reauired or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees no? covered by original fee payment) Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (sia . certifies that the information 1/or unusual expenses^curred ^ ^.ew supplied is true and co^c\ to the \mjif his/hpr krf) = Applicant ’s signature Date^-r OWNER’S SIGNATURE ( „„i,Vnr5on and further authorized reasonable members for purposes of investigation aniPvetlfication oi 4 / _ / Owner’s signature Date of this change prior to the meeting. . r% i \. • * » ' »•. • r .nJB /2^Si >1^ —•J-w ?■•/*“■*■.>. ••• "v\// Igustafsdrr d^ign inc. August 26,1994 City of Orono Department of Planning & Zoning P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Dear City Officials: We are requesting a variance for the Lear Residence at 2525 Dunwoody Avenue to do the following work: install rip rap along the existing shoreline within the given specifications of the City and DNR. Replace existing retaining walls on the hillside and add new walls to retain the hillside where it currently is eroding and sliding toward the lake. Grade In the work area to accommodate the construction of the walls, but not to make substantial changes in existing grade. Install plantings and erosion control materials In place of sod that is eroding and sliding toward the lake. Dale A. Gustafson end. •4 •% • • •»#.1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 -E iT\i 1 55 nf.T X • • . 40 ^-V A 49 i'i ^ 7 ^ I • • • •• .4i’s«ia■•I■IliJ .i: imimi. i r’-i^ -itv- v/^seh to-m-M zi U>OR ■ ^ 024«0 mRMOOOY ^Wm ‘ BENNETT C DONNEY ITER ‘ > , BENNETT C OqMNEY ^'AOOR , E«75 SHADYHOOO RO ’ - ' EXCELSIOR 0002AVE^ • '*H?» • '-v. »553314 ryv:! SB v ’ 20-117-23 21 OOOS ftOOR (02470:< OWMOOOY AVENAME ; MARIA LUISA .LUECK . ITER - V I HARZA LUISA! LUECK /AOOR 2470 OWMOOOY AVE • 4 u 1 NAYZATA HN 55S91 r "r kODR 'NAME AYER - AOOR ~ t y.l,r: 30 20-117-23 21 0020 02520 OWOKWOY AVE OALE HILL 'BALE(HILL '2520 DWMOOOY AV • NAYZATA NN 55341 m ^ .. “••'OR r?v«.‘ 3B^- 20-117-23 21 0024 '.02580 OWMOOOY AVE I I 1 V ‘' ' \J IME ) J .A G NAFUS t i JOHN A NAFUS :; • •» • >Ui.NAYZATA MN Y AVC 55S91 ♦ 117-25 21 0052 ^ DUmOOCY AVE im n ^7 . j )R ME >1 ERNEST C BLANCHARD ETAL I ;> ■ ERNEST C BLA n CHARO lOR . ■ 2585 DWMOOOY AVE ■V' . NAYZATA MN 55341 V - ;vi. .*.• < V araii^R HAnE AYER^2i - ' i SB ^<20-117-23 22 0016 >, 02485 ' DWMOOOY AVE rN> MICKEY A G 0 MICKEY jiI I f ->-si \ ‘ j •. j N.P. HICKEY 8 0 A HICKEY E/AOOR‘.( 24B5 OWO«X)lDY AVE ! NAVzATA MN 55341 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST56 20-117-25 21 0005 02480 DUNNOODY AVE D 6 HORAN A T A NENOT DAVID 6 HORAN A TPACY HENDT 2460 DUrtOODY AVE NAYZATA MN 5559156 ^20-117-25 21 0006 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LANRENCE T NeNDERSON LANRENCE T HENDERSON 2464 DUNNOODY AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 3# 20-117-23 21 0032 02585 I'i V'-'i r-'^ . . t a- ’ - • 56 20-117-25 21 0021 02540 DUNI4oOOY AVE KNUTE J NOROARD ETAL KNUTE J NORGARO 2540 DUNHOfbDY AVE NAYZAtA MN 55591 56 20-117-25 21 0050 02545 DUNNOODY AVE N A HULTGREN ADM KULTGREN NILLIAM HULTGREN 2545 DUNNOODY AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 56 20-117-25 22 0014 02475 DUNHOODY AVE J A A S L POHERS DAVID D A VICKI R VICKERMAN 2625 LYDIARD CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55551 56 20-117-25 22 0017 02505 DUNNOODY AVE JAMES S NOROLIE ET AL JAMES S NORDLIE 250$ DUNNOODY AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 • <. • • ■ * . 4*k I*'. REPORT56 20-117-25 21 0004 02476 DUNNOODY AVE AUDREY G OGLAND AUDREY 6 OGLAND 2476 DUNNOODY AVE NAYZATA MN ^5591 v56 20-11702500 Dl TIMOTHY TIMOTHY 2500 NAYZATA 2560 DWMOOOY AVE S HAYZATA MN S5341 38 20-117-23 21 0031 02565 DWMbOOY AVE H L BZELKE ACM BIELKE NARREN L/CHRlSTINE 2565 DUNNOODY AVE NAYZATA Hri 55341 i:r‘1Jiff'fe*. 38 20-117-23 22 02477 DWMoODY J A A S L PONBRS NILLIAM P A GEORGEtTA HICKEY 2477 DUNMOOOY* AVE NAYZATA MN 55341 38 20-117-23 22 02525 DUNNOODY J H LEAR A B JAMES H LEAG 2525 DUNNOOdY NAYZATA MN 55341 -]i V ^S. 'HENNEPINmn-■‘V *1‘ 4 ^ ♦m'li!’'tv;:;V' • ' ' •’ ■*^v'Mv^.tO-117>& M 00S« ;?^nt OtiOl ■ CASCO POINT RO I^HAIC >i tRUCE J HEO0LON CT Al. RV<n:'HBRUCC-J HEDOLON AM> DORV' CAim J CIXME-HEDOLOH t*Pf : *401 CASCO poimt .ro V i V. i HAYtATA Ml . 55501• i • (*••• * ^ *»•'* ' ^ * Ik * *.fei';--.y ;.- --.fi- * / ■ r *VK » ■ • m>r?Vf § ’ ’li'V ^ ^ *’"■ -' ** * ♦ • * ■ ’ . ■' - V.?-r- ■• •- •#•►•'; ..fS?,-. .••,.••• V • •.. •, ^ ■■ ■■ .i;;^ .k t ♦ ■i , -Ti‘ “ *.V‘ >\5lV • ^ ‘ •v|'fe':r'#-'•-■■ v^'t- N ‘ ; *'.i V.. t • t^ • i - A ' ■ '?tV> *■ • ■ ?*■■■ <•"•*■ •. '•'■. ' ■ • ■ . t W •?■•••.• :\ > .' > • ‘'■I •;.• !■ k';.: . .• ;■• ■ -S' V - ' -ii 'V.< • ■* ‘ • •• -6- . ■ •. * •»■ \ A*. *• » « #196 I ■'o/p r •a!I ^ O 0 Q 2 Z 3 A 'V V. »• ••• • •• 0^ •*• *■♦ - i’ •/.: ■. V ■T> . i • ••*•*.#•••••• • * • ' • ' • • •. •- ■ J r ■ I • • i ?.- 8 gustafeon design, Inc.Lear Residence 2525 Dunwoody Ave. A taliillnGli«16iMt Aum^25,l9U 111V[11iGrono, MN J #1965 N 4 ''A- Bonestroo Rosene Anderlfk & Associates Engineers & Architects September 9, 1994 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota SS323 Re: Lear Residence File No. 139-1965 Ono G Bonnooa PE Roben W Btnenc. PE • Joieph C AnoehiiL P£ Mjrvtfi L SorvJU. P£ Richjid E HxTier. PE Gienn P Cook. PE Thomji E Noye\ PE SOOert G SchunchL PE M EDerun. C PA •Senor CornulEjnc Mow^ A SanML PE Ke<h A Gcxdoa PE Rootft P PVHerte. PE P<ru«d W Foittv. PE OjvO O Loskocj. PE Rooea C Pusspk. AIA Jerry A BoufOon. P£ \Urk A Hmson. PE M<rvie< T Rjutmjnn. PE Ted K PieW PE Tronus P Andenon AIA Oonjid C BurgjidL PE Thomas A Syfka PE Fiedenc J Stenooig. PE ismaei Manmei. PE ^«hae< P Rau. PE ^nes M Pmg, AlCP Thomas w ^tenoa PE Mchae<C Lynch. PE James P MaUnd. PE Jerry O ^azsch PE ScoR J Aiganek. PE Kennech P Anderson. PE Mark P Ml PE Mark A Se^ PE Gary W k«)r«n. PE Paul J Garmon. AiA Darwi J Edgmoa PE A Pek SchTT^dt PE Phaip J Casweff. PE MarkO Vl^«ri PE Miles B Jemea PE f. . • L Phap PE Karen L W«mea PE Gary O KnaoriQ. PL f ibdd Foster PE Kfph P Yipp PE 0><gUs J Oenoc PE ShaMwn O Gustahoa PE Cec*o Ovier. PE Pat^ G Heuer PE jonn P Goider PE Charles Enckson LeoM P»Aieniiy HartanM Oson James F Engreiardl (V SEP 1 ^ CVT< Dear Mike, We have reviewed the proposal to replace existing retaining walls and riprap along the shoreline of Spring Park Bay on the Lear residence at 2525 Dunwoody Avenue. The information submitted is incomplete and unacceptable. The City should not continue a review of this application until a plan has been prepared by a Registered Engineer. Information which is critical for this type of project includes: - type of wall proposed - method of providing drainage for walls - method of tie-back restraint for wall - geotechnical evaluation and/or type of fill proposed - cross section of proposed wall and side slopes - loading condition used for wall design - indication as to which of the existing trees will be saved - description of the construction technique proposed for working around the mature trees and root systems in the area We would recommend a modular masonry block wall be used for the improvements. There arc many manufacturers which provide an engineered wall system for almost any application. The wall should have a draintile line installed to function properly in clay soils. We do not recommend gravity type retaining walls, such as boulder walls, due to the difficulty in determining their effectiveness or durability. We do not recommend timber retaining walls as a permanent solution. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MIM 55113 • 612-636-4600 ■f'. •V \irAiii '• i ■ \ - orn^r..k W \ Croee Sections of Walls and Grades Lear Residence 2523 Dumwoody Ave. scale 11nch = 16 feet X GrtvtIBaM Gftwl 9 ~r- . I 935 929 6 0HW ---- 928 Rip R«p Stalls \ \ \ X V \ \xx\\x\\\ X X X X X X X '•^Z' / /✓/✓✓//////XXXXXXXXXXX X^X^X ✓ ✓/ /✓✓✓✓✓✓✓ / / xxxxxxxxx X X X X X^X X ///////^^^ XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XX xxxxxxxxx XX XX X XX \ -- iti i Section 1 947 6' 929.6 OHW 928 Rip Rap Stalls Section 2 929 6 OHW 928 Rip Rap Starts Section 3 “Backfill Graval F« ^ ^-Gaogrkf at pac spacs — Rivard Bouldars — Drain THa Compacted Gravel Fit Typical Wall Section f" ^ r I gustafson design Inc ■ ^ ,h Hi^r September 16,1994 Mr. Mike Gaffron Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Attached are the supplemental materials needed tor the Lear variwce. I have worked out the requested details of the wall and drainage system for the proposed project. I have faxed copies of the wall detail to Shawn Gustafson tor verification. Thank you for your help with this request, S\ry& rely. Dale A. Gustafson end. 1 t . T ^ m»- tol (61 2) 544'"421 5Aua ' Mn- fiol1845 Wisconsin Ave. No; ^ Golden Valley, MN 55427 gustafson design Inc. , p .. tJtn ,*! ,» t-**^*-* n p «; i.r. .N..^.^ f I September 16,1994 Mr. Shawn Gustafson, P.E. Bonestroo Rosene Andertlk & Associates 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul. MN 55113 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Attached are the supplemental materials needed for the Lear variance. I have worked out the requested details of the wall and drainage system for the proposed project I have delivered copies of the wall detail to the city of Orono and I have mailed hard copies to your office. Thank you for your help with this request. Dale A. Gustafson end. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 - ^ . ... . f L . . . A. . . \ /% ^ request for council action ^ DATE: ITEM NO.; % Administrator Reviewed;Agenda Section; ZoningDepartment Approval; Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Building & Zoning Administrator Hem Description: Road - Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Zoning District: LR-IC, Single Family Ukeshore Residential l/2acre. ^:,SIJl’ruse “^S t metnrpe™TtSS^^^^ fo' -H-or.. List of Exhibits A - Resolution Action 10/19/94 D - Memo and Exhibits of 10/12/94 Background re"re“ this was not recognized by staff. came to the City’s attention that the church also had Those additions were commenc narkine lot That work was stopped and applicantscommenced constructing an expanston to the park ng lot Tha^ ff wem required to ftle a variance appl.cauon st^e the tardcoverj^ a^ During staff review of the hardcover appltc carport had been constructed strucmral additions requite a condiliona ““ \ ^ ^ within 47' of the east side lot line'.r s-’s: Also during the hardcover variance review it with^n^the property adjacent neighborhood due to an old deteriorated drain Engineer has recoiiunended c";s7ai:^aCulvert along applicants’ east property boundary to take the overflow when the old drain tile cannot handle the flow. r Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 October 19, 1994 Zoning File #1960 Applicants have agreed to construct these drainage improvements as recommended by the City Engineer. The neighbor to the east has indicated he will cooperate with the applicant to accomplish this. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission reviewed the hardcover variance, drainage concerns and structural additions at their September 19th meeting, tabled the application for further review of the drainage concerns, and again reviewed the application on October 17th. Planning Commission on a vote of 7-0 recommended approval of the hardcover variance subject to applicants concurrently completing the drainage improvements per the City Engineer s recommendation and requiring that a parking stall layout schematic be provided and the lot be striped according to that schematic. This schematic will be required prior to issuance of a land alteration permit for the project. Planning Commission ftirther recommended that the carport setback of 47’ be allowed and a variance granted, that conditional use permit approval be concurrently granted for the structural additions, and that applicants pay the $50 incremental fee to amend their application to include the setback variance and conditional use permit. Planning Commission further recommended that applicants grant a 15’ road easement per the 1970 conditional use permit discussions and preliminary approval (Exhibit H of 9/13/94 memo). Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the application per the Planning Commission recommendation. wi^h one additional condition: Applicants grant a drainage easement 15’ in width, being 7.5’ either side of the final culvert/swale location within applicants’ property. A resolution reflecting the above noted conditions is attached for Council action COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: , seconded by , to adoptProposed motion: Moved by ____________. . ------------------- Resolution #____granting a hardcover variance, structural setback variance and structural additions conditional use permit for the Navarre Congregation of Jehovah ’s Witnesses at 3655 Togo Road. Vote: ___ayes,____nays. I r ■'r'- ' i i t> A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2, SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) AND SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (B) AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (B) FILE NO. I960 WHFRFAS Kinedom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses (hereinafter the "applicants") represen^d of P-pe.^ Togo Road w.m.n U.e City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows. Exhibit A attached (hereinafter the "property"); and “.Sir- ^ 47 ’ from the side lot line where a 50’ setback is normally required. Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File ^1960. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family l^eshote Residential Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on Septemtar 19 and OcXTv 1994 and recommended approval of the proposed variances and conditional use permit based on the following fmdings; Page 1 of 7 A. B. C. D. E. F. Applicants were granted a conditional use permit for church use in 1970 on this 1.3 acre property. A church building and parking lot were subsequently constructed. In 1970 a parking lot was proposed to include 52 parking stalls to meet the City requirement for 1 stall per 4 persons based on a 200 person capacity building. That parking lot was constructed somewhat smaller than the proposed plan. Church use has expanded to a level where parking overflows onto Togo Road which is extremely narrow and not suited for parking. The proposed parking lot expansion will add approximately 4,850 s.f. of parking area which will accomodate at least 13 additional vehicles if properly striped. The proposed parking lot expansion increases hardcover on the property from 35% to 43%, where only 35% would be allowed in the 500-1,000 ’ hardcover setback zone. The parking lot will add to the runoff accumulation from the 30 acre watershed upstream from a deteriorated drain tile on the adjacent property. Per the City Engineer ’s recommendation, it would be appropriate that the applicants improve drainage by construction of a swale or culvert along applicants’ east property line to alleviate the potential for flooding of the adjacent property. Applicants applied for and were granted a building permit for a lO’xll coat room addition and 14’xl8 ’ carport in December 1993. The inspections department erroneously did not call out the need for a conditional use permit, which nonnally would be required for such additions to a church in a residential zone. Those additions were constructed and the carport was constructed to extend 22’ east from the existing church building rather than the 14’ approved plan, and therefore extended to a point 47 from the east property line where a 50’ setback would normally be required for a church structure existing as a conditional use permit in a residential zone. Page 2 of 7 . . , A 4. 5. 6. I.The 3’ carport encroachment has no impact on neighboring properties, and if reduced to meet the setback would be significantly less functional for its intended purpose. Further, an existing tree line along the east property boundary will minimize the visual impact of the encroacliment on neighboring properties. It would be appropriate to grant the conditional use permit after-the-fact for the structural additions. K.The 1970 conditional use permit discussions and preliminary approval by City Council required a 15 ’ road easement be granted. The survey submitted for the application indicates only a 10 ’ road easement. Planning Commission finds that it would be appropriate to require the applicants to grant the ftill 15 ’ road easement as a condition of the current approval. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and of the community. wrve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessaiy to a leviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for the additions to this church which exists by conditional use in a residential zotw *■' —<1 level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of 7 1 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to allow hardcover of 43% in the 500-1,000’ lakeshore setback zone where only 35% hardcover is nonnally allowed, and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (B; for strucmral additions to the church which have been completed per building permit #5822 dated December 15, 1993, and grants a variance to Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (B) to allow the carport structure to be located 47 ’ from the side lot line where a 50’ setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: A .Applicants in conjunction with the adjacent property owner shall obtain a land alteration permit prior to recommencing construction of the parking lot expansion and drainage improvements. 2.Applicants shall complete the drainage improvements as recommended by the City Engineer and subject to inspection and approval by the City Engineer. 3.Prior to issuance of the land alteration permit for the parking expansion, applicants shall provide a parking stall layout schematic, and shall adhere to that schematic by striping the parking stalls. 4.Prior to issuance of the land alteration pcimit for expansion of the parking lot, applicants shall pay an additional $50 incremental fee to cover the structural conditional use permit and setback variance. 5.Prior to issuance of the land alteration permit for expansion of the parking lot, applicants shall provide the City with the following easements: A.A drainage easement 7.5’ either side of the culvert or swale centerline within applicants ’ property. B.15’ road, drainage and utility easement along the northerly 15’ of the property to accommodate the existing Togo Road. Page 4 of 7 tfW IT 1 >£arr— r* 6.Auihorities eranted by this variance run with the property not with the owner, but are ^^siv^only L must be exercised by application for a building permtt witWn one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (October 24, 1995). 7.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of tWs resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zomng Code, shall automatical y terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8. agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of October, 1994. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on *“ 24*^ of October 1994 by Edward J, Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Halim, Mayor and City Cler mraty of O^ono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 . r .-A-. . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of ) ss. , 199_ before me a Notary Public within and for saidm and who executed the foregoing instrument.ana' known to me to be the persons) aescrioeo m acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act ana STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ day of NOTARY PUBLIC , 199 before me a Notary Public within acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of___ NOTARY PUBUC , 199__ before me a Notary Public within “kll^wnTo me“o*^TrS^^^^^ “ “■'<* '“?aeedS^owSXd to he (to) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 6 of 7 .. -— .T • . m f • .. vf ,'**T-v.*V-*:i»*>-'*' CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1960 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 10/19/94 TO; Tor R. Jonsen 6225 Westwood Circle Mound, MN 55364 COPIES TO:Donald Elliot 15130-D 8th Ave. N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Eugene Winter 5564 Momingview Terrace Mound, MN 55364 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 10/15/94 VOTE:7 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following; Approved subject to conditions noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Applicants to complete drainage improvements per City Engineer’s recommendation. 2. Parking stall layout schematic be provided and the lot be striped according to schematic. 3. Payment of $50 add-on fee to amend application to include conditional use permit for additions and carport setback variance. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday, October 24, 1994; meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. To; From: Date: Subject: Chairman Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator October 12, 1994 #1960 Tor Johnson/Navarre Congregation of Jehovah Witnesses, 3655 Togo Road - Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing Disirici: LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential. 1/2 Acre Application: Request for hardcover variance to expand church parking lot. List of Exhibits A > City Engineer ’s Comments B - Staff Memo to City Engineer 9/23/94 C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/26/94 D - Planning Commission Minutes 9/19/94 E - Memo and Exhibits of 9/13/94 Discussion This item Nvas tabled at your September meeting pending review of drainage issues by the City Engineer dnd Public Works Department. Staff met with the City Engineer and Public Works staff at the site on September 29. Referring to the topographic map. Exhibit L of the September 13 memo, note that a drainage area of approximately 30 acres contributes to the wetland area southeast of the parking lot on the adjacent property. The only outlet for this wetland is an old undergrowd ti e underneath the adjacent property and continuing underneath Togo Road to the north. This tile is of unknown construction and probably 300-400’ in length. Its outlet has not been located and may be below the surface of the wetland north of Togo Road. Failure of this tile to handle heavy runoff events has lead to flooding in the rear yard of the residence immediately east of the applicants property. The City Engineer has recommended as a solution that the applicants excavate a swale along the east side of the existing parking lot ai the elevation of the bottom of the existing catch basin adjacent to Togo Road. Alternatively, a 12" culvert could be installed to avoid having a deep and perhaps not very maintainable swale right next to the parking lot. As of this writing, applicants are gathering additional elevation data to conclude how they will proceed. In a meeting with applicant ’s representative Jeff Metzger on October 12, it w^ noted that given the requirement for this drainage work, applicants will either procee wi r •4 •. ,V-.'r v»4 i Zoning File #1960 October 12, 1994 Page 2 ST-" »f, «<i. <•>'— ■towards a resolution to the problem if it is not resolved now. Please a_ is substantial hardship and justification for gran lot, and if so, attach appropriate conditions. Conditional Use Permit for Additions Planning Commission a conditional use permit, issued building permits but for in ’ x 1T coat room addition and the 18* x 22’ carport »here a 50’ se>back is required) are no. inappropriate L .he site and are less of an issue than the parking lot concerns. a separate Resolution document. Staff Recommendation If Planning Commission recommends approval of the variances for die parking lot expansion, approval should be conditioned on; 1. Applicants to complete drainage improvement per City Engineer's recommendation. « • ^ ▲ I , —------w ^ 2. Parking stall layout schematic be provided and the lot be striped according to that schematic. If Planning Commission concludes include l^^Shlon *eir application by paying the $50 incremental fee for the setback variance.the setback variance. CUP discussions and preliminary approval (see Exhibit H r Zoning FUe #1960 October 12, 1994 Page 3 Options for Action 1, Recommend approval of parking lot expansion and CUP/variance for structural additions subject to conditions detailed above. 2. Recommend approval of only part of the application 3. Table for further information. 4. Recommend denial of all or part of the application (note specific reasons) 5. Other. ^ 5^ Qu-'?" /\Pf"7" & r if I Bonestroo Mm Rosene S5 Anderlik& 1^11 Associates Engineers & Architects BoneSOOO. Anc^:k jrXJ AsSCOJteS. ffX '5 Afhmvaw^ ATorvFcuJ' Oto G Booesnoo P6 ffcoe^ W Posene PE * iciepn C Andet!'K PE SUfvn L Sorw2i<J PE P<n;irtJ 6 Tufr^. PE G.er<n R Cook. PE Thomji E Noy^s. PE ffoc^ft G Vhunicht PE Suvin M Eocrun. C PA •Sencf Con^offaoc October 3,1994 a Sjmtxti PE ^ Co<Ocn PE Rcoer:« PE R<hjfO W Pccef PE Ojvx J C Loskou PE Hooeft C Ruvsek. AIA Jerry A Bourdon. PE A Hjryyi PE T Rjutm^nn PE TW k FickJ PE ThorrVM R Anderwn A I A Oon^] C fl'jrqaroi PE T^oryi A PE FtO^ J StenDorg PE ivra*' M^rtine; PE .V<hJCi p Riu PE Agnn M R:r>g A.' C P Tfxyrvjs W Rrtcnon PE V<^^r C L>nch PE J^mci R MlOnd. PE Jerry D Ptfuycn. PE Scon J Arganek. PE krnnetri P Anoe^von PE Mark R fioRv PE Mam A Sen PE Gary W Monen. PE Paul J Gar*r«or> A i A Dar-ei J EJgertcr PE A RiCk Scr'rnKJt PE p*'^-r J Catwek PE Mark O waam PE Me\ B Jensen. PE L Ph«n G'awe^ p E kjTn L Werncn P£ Gary O Kfmoftz. PE netn R >Jpa PE Douglas J BenoA. PE Snawvn D Gustafson. PE Cec' O Okv^er. PE Piui G Heuer PE jonn P Goroer. PE Char« A £f<iscn Lee M PA^<etsky M O'sen f Eoge'ha'tfl Mr. Mike Gaflron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 OCT 7 139^ c::■'* •«/ r \ \ j Re- Kingdom Hall - Togo Road Our File No. 139-1960 ! J Dear Mike: «.«.»rK's:,^ £ S ,h. ...I. Tk mi.. Ml.»»“ »l»pla by the property owner Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. / s/ Glenn R. Cook GRC:pr I39-OENN6-COR Ti3S West Higtwvay 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 412-636-4600 h. To:Glenn Cook, City Engineer John Gerhardson, Public Works Director From: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 23, 1994 Parking Lot Hardcover Variance - Jehovah ’s Witness Property, 3655 Togo Road Area Drainage Concerns The Jehovah ’s Witnesses congregation is proposing to expand their parking lot southward, which will result in an additional 4,000 s.f. of hardcover. This item was tabled by the Planning Commission at their September 19 meeting in order that the area drainage concerns be studied by the City. Planning Commission requests that you review the drainage issues in this area, and make recommendations as to what, if any. area drainage improvements should be attached as conditions of approval if that hardcover variance for the parking lot is approved. A copy of the 2’ contour map for the area is attached. I would appreciate if your comments and recommendations can be foiwarded to me by Monday, October 10 in order that this item be placed on the Planning Commission ’s October 17 agenda for action. If you have any questions, please contact me. 2. r CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE <!fl960 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 26, 1994 TO:Tor R. Jonsen 6225 Westwood Circle Mound, MN 55364 COPIES:Donald Elliot 15130-D 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 Eugene Winter 5564 Momingview Terrace Mound, MN 55364 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 09/19/94 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Table for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Tabled in order that drainage issues be reviewed. The City Engineer and Public Worte Department have been requested to make specific recommendations for solving the area drainage concerns. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission, Monday, October 17, 1994; meeting stans at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. •” -.TdF*' r minutes of the orono planning commission MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 19,1994 (#8) Item #^959 - Ogland - Continued Gai&on stated this is an after-the-fact variance where a shed b'localed over the lot line, extending into the i^t-of-way of MUside Place, and is pa^ly on the Dakota Rail property. This struSre requires a 5' rear yard and 10*^ yard setback. The lot coverage including theS^ is 19.1% exceeding the l|T% limit. Locating the structure in any street is not allowed, dqd the hardcover limha^ is exceeded. There is also a sewer line which runs through wheh^the shed is locat^ Gaffron stated a hold hannless agreement would be needed if t^shed was ^wed to stay on the City right-of-way as well as an easement from Dakota^l. Apifther option would be to place the shed within the property lines. Peterson commented on the neat u^l^ o^d shed and properly. He noted other sheds similarly located along the areabtu questionddwhether Planning Commission could act on this affidavit with the shed sit^ on Dakota property. Ogland voiced the problpm^with space limitation in av|ot of this size stressing the need for the shed. He also said^e shed is on skids and can beh^ily moved. The public road iSwe was discussed. Possible future repair^^sewer line was determined not to be a proM^ The road is being maintained as lawn hCT^^d elsewhere. Mayor C/llahan commented on the probable difficulty with obti variani a Dakota Rail Pet^on moved. Berg seconded, to table Item #1959 allowing applicant to^sent another option for shed location. Ayes 4, Nays 0. _ ________ ________________ ^ M ■“ m — ■ ■ I ■ _____________ ___________ _________\ (#9) ITEM #1960 - TOR JONSEN/NAVARRE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, 3655 TOGO ROAD - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The applicant was present. •» Sw _________... . / minutes of the orono planning commission meeting HELD ON SEPTEMBER 19,1994 (#9) Rem #1960 - Jehovah's Witness - Continued 33% lin^tadon by S% for a total of 43%. to«viewing.hisappU.«o„^~^ given buUdi^perm..stoye«^ being aUowed because of the churcl^s lotion ^ cantort was buHt. not a AT side setback which is less extends 22* from the eastside setback variance or partial carport removal Utan the 50' side setback 7^!^“ be e«tcert.ated if the parking lot is is necessary. An existing rainag P nlaced on the application that the church be a^ed onius application and is to be Th^ ramp is necessaty due to an inside stauway. Applicant representative, ieff MeUger neighborhood. A enor in calculation result^allow«^ for 52 stalls setback requirement, y® °"7M„3ritv The church id not fully utilize the 52 stall based on one stall per four seat capacity. ... . jj to replace those lost allotment at that time. Theh- request to ^ work with the building of the handicap ramp. Metzger whh the City to solve the drainage problem. parking. Peterson inquired of the added of not only ordinances but hardcover limns. Peterson inquired of appBcant what ?^'^"&?w;Srhe Sp ramp and the fact the parking lot rmttaHy approved in 1970 was not fully utilized. minutes of the orono planning commission meeting HELD ON SEPTEMBER 19,1994 (#9) Item #1960 - Jehovah's Witness - Continued A churA The Commission members p.:rSnoe as we« a, .he painrins of .he carport. Nolan moved. Smith seconded, to table Item #1960 to next Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 4, Nays 0. -----------------------xncwviu^ ^ —l. faschke , 3349 crystal bay koad - VARIANCES-^UBLIC HEARING / The Affidavit of mKration and Certificate ofMailing wetted. Gaffion said this appUV « “tTe wthfaTSStm Utocated existing deck and fn X?^^ is allowed in the 0-75'sTi'S rsS-s made. \ / Comnnssion men*«s^cri^o^ ® ffie?on"mctor and ♦ ♦; \jfr OolM^uestioned the need for a variance to repair or During pubhc comment tme, application is different. Smith stated replace an exisnng stractute. ^ o^d^^to protect the lake, todny no building is allowed in thp smith moved, Nolan seconde/o recommend a\oval of Item *196.. Ayes 4. Nays 0. sts ro'iS The AflSdavit of Pubji^tion and Certificate of Mailing wre noted. Ron Bowen of P^ne Restorations a Type 7 wetlani^th excavation an p ace . --I «he^m^ of wetlands, forests, Bowen display/ a map of the area in the environment on his property with this project _ . preSlving the lake and approval for this project. Bowens sees this ^a first defense m p says it will be developed as a natural watershed. r i TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Adm. DATE:September 13, 1994 SUBJECT: <1^1960 Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Wimesses, 3655 Togo Road - Variance/CUP- Public Hearing Application: Request for hardcover variance to expand church parking lot. Zoning District LR- IC, Single Family Residential List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - List of Additional Persons to be Notified E - Survey F - Hardcover Calculations G - 1970 Site Plan H - 1970 CUP Documentation I - Pertinent Code Sections J - Building Permit /('5822 and Documentation K - Section 10.56, Subd. 16(K) Pertinent Code Sections and Variances Requested 1.Section 10.22. Subd. 2 and Seci-on 10.56, Subd. 16(L) - Hardcover limiuiion of 35% in 500-1,000’ zone (existing •• 35%; proposed = 43%; variance - 8%). Section i0.20. Subd. 3(B) - Churches are a conditional use in residential zones, with no buildings to be located less than 50’ from an abutting residential lot. Section 10.61, Subds 4. 5, 7. 8, 9, 10 - Parking performance standards including: 1 parking stall required per 4 seats based on capacity of train assembly hall. • Setbacks for parking lots: 10 ’ rear, 10 side. 4.Section 10.56, Subd. 16(K) - Shoreland stormwater management requirements. 1Jr ' I J Zoning File /fl960 September 13, 1994 Page 2 Background Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses was granted a conditional use permit for church use in 1970 on this 1.3 acre property. A church building and parking lot were subsequently constructed, although the current survey shows that the site plan was only generally adhered to. At that time the parking lot was proposed to include 52 parking stalls to meet the "1/stall per 4 persons" requirement for a 200 person capacity building. The parking lot was constructed some'vhat smaller than the original plan. Church use has apparently expanded to a level where during specific times the parking overflows onto Togo Road which is extremely narrow and not suited for parking. The current request is to expa^ the parking lot by approximately 36’xllO’. Absent a parking layout but using the standard -tnn . f ner sta’< formula, the additional parking area will accommodate an additional 13 vehicles. Hardcover Variance This property is in the 500-1,000 ’ hardcover setback zone and with the recent structural additions ^discussed below) the propeny had reached its hardcover limit of 35%. The propose additional parking increases 500-1,000 ’ hardcover to approximately 43%. It may be somewhat ironic that the church at one time owned the residential property to the west but some time ago sold tb t property. Unfortunately, that might have allowed the expansion without a variance had that property been combined with the church parcel. Drainage Concerns stormwater detention ponding facilities, or perhaps finattcial J" “ fl,e drainage improvement. Any approval for the parking lot should be conditioned -_„rnval Ctarch-s involvement in 'such project. It would ^etn approprtate that any ap^ov^ recommendation no. oe forwarded to Council until the City Engineer and Public Works Department have completed their review of this situation. Zoning File #1960 September 13, 1994 Page 3 Recent Additions . .. I J VU« mnled a building permit for a lO’xl 1' coat room addition and The church applied for ^ inspection': department did not call out a 14’xl8- carport m December 1993 Unformiat^. ^ f adjuions. the need for a conditional to «he church This error only came to light during “han .he 14’ proposed, and constructed the , p„peny line where a 50' setback would normally be aWThumh Irture exis.i^ng S a conditional use permit in a residential rone. Since the constructed fhc CiTs“^d tirm^^iim of the chumh filing a conditional use permit application for the expansions which have already been permute Issues to Consider 1 Is there substantial hardship and justification for granting a hardcover variance to expand the parking lot?me parMiig ikn. If the parkine lot is allowed to expand, staff would recommend that a pa,king stall layout schematic bi provided and that the lot requited to be striped. 3.Since the parking lot expansion suggest zone, it can be argued that the parking P .necific site plan which is now original conditional use ‘ ^y Planning Commission and Council rs rc—r r r:tlt Ume ,l practice was to approve conditional use permits without a resolution. 4. existing neighborhood drainage problems. 5.t :“beXrtote\':r«^ - perml. Is there any reason why the City staff should not proceed to require the carport be reconstructed to meet the 50’ setback.^ » , C _ OV-'T H o ■ kl. . ■f/-. Zoning File ^1960 September 13, 1994 Page 4 6.Perhaps unrelated to either of these issues is that the 1970 conditional use permit discussions and preliminary approval by Council required a 15’ road easement be granted The survey indicates a 10’ road easement. The Public Works Department would like an easement including 10’ of shoulder in addition to the paved road area. Staff has not researched whether any easement documents were ever executed for this road. Options for Action 1. Approve as proposed 2. Approve with conditions 3. Table for further information. 4. Recommend denial for specific reasons 5.Other. i { ■v. # % k CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Applicauon ree v^QO^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming struemres $2W. After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1 Qa t%J Ji J PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address____________36^ Tp ejo Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Present use of property: -----residentia ----- Zoning District:__________Feflidftntia L----------------------------------- (month/year) (••■-TV I'rLI I I U'MU'ftt/ ___ ^ ^ M mmirrMAkirc f’f fJCE—♦nnui-. CM » Ai.‘U applicant Name Tor R..T<->nsen Address: 5225JiBStiiQQd_Cii:clfiL City: Mound Phone (homeX Phone(woric)_ 477-7056 t-LLTIc- - flUCI% O'] CtH TL vnA fV}w* VI' V*A.} /•^vv*« V Zip: 55364 y''r-.'vrrr.-5-_rUAitk' \~ijlhUtii-17> v"'.v5 ' , LOO'] liVi I'U’ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phn^"(^ork f________ Namei;a^nrrp Pnngr nf TQhmrah'e Witn orp^^ _______________Zip:_5S322. Address: Tevg ^ p^aA DESCRimON OF REQUEST PuLiibr rgiintinflfr'*’ w^ondma existing parking --------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES required Lot Area ___Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) hardship /description of preventing Describe undue hardship or practical i ty ?n-nrr Hi’*- p^"'ktna wilL-fccomplianee wiU, Zoning Code requirements: JhtsvUl^ns^^ ^ «,„rrn nrmr-'-'-Y we haw an nvRrflnu. -iH-pndmi i , Tri nn yrrant riririnj Omrrti prnrrrriv wiivu -r- rmitr nrirrotf sreout.—______________ i« on p... „f our Pifi-iisrim Parwinq lo^r W-tU ______________1_ ■ __ « » • I _____ —— (attach additional sheets if necessary) minutes of a regular meeting held august 10, 1970 Scarlcs moved, McCarthy seconded, that the .-couest of the Jehovah V/itnesscs a. conditional use pemit at 3675 To"0 Road, be given preliminary approval as P^o^ented, subject to allowing a IS* street casement along the front of the property. lotion. Ayes (5) • Nays (0). Franzel moved, Searles seconded, to advertise for bids for a bookkeeping machine for the office, aPPr<>«^;. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Bntterfiolcl abstained. McCarthy moved, SearlesaoDoin^ment of the Village Administrator to^nceotiate with all Village employees, employee-groups and l?nions for be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays COJ- McCarthy moved, Searles seconded, to pay time -ind one-half rate to Street and Sewer Department employees for work over eight hours in any 24-hour period. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Searles moved, McCarthy ffrequest of Dr. Wyatt loo, J^OLoma Linda Avenue, for a property exchange with tnc ViUagi, be referred to the Planning Commission. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). So-’-les moved,McCarthy seconded, that_ Re^SlSIiSn #356, A Resolution Appointing Election Judges For The To Bo Held September 15, State And Village Election To November 3, 1970, be adopted. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). McCarthy moved, Franzel seconded, that Resolution #357, A Resolution Endorsing Amendment No. 1 9n Tax-Exempt P^^ayrCO). be adopted. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays luj. Butterfield abstained. McCarthy moved, Franzel seconded, that the Sa2tor*s Estimate #1, billow Drive, Bill Wear Excavating, be paid. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Preliminary Approval 3675 Togo Road ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Bookkeeping ^tachine EMPLOYEE SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES Street 6 Sewer Departments property exchange 1220 Loma Linda Avenue Dr. Wyatt Moe resolution #356 resolution #357 CONTRACTOR’S ESTIMATE #1 Bill Wear Excavating y •I - * VILLAGU OF ORONO Regular Meeting of the Planning Consission, July 20, 1970 The Planning Coneiission met on tiie above date with the following members present: Chairman nussell, Dongoske, Dom, Elliott, Kullberg, anH Councilman lIcCarthy. Absent: Bartig, Gasch, Nicholls, O'Malley, Poisson, and Schoening. 7:30 P.M. I • Herb Johnson represented himself in an application for t conditional use permit to fill 6,000 squcirc feet of low land during construction on Lot S, Block 2, Myrtlowood. Russell i.:^d a letter from Mr. Johnson's attorney to the Village Attorney followed by tiie reading: of the two ordinances pertaining to filling low lands. Discussion was then held on the legality of Mr. Johnson's application as to whether a buildin" permit could be withheld if a person could build on a lot if all aspects of the codes were met. Mr. Joluison oxi>lained that the bii^gest problem in construction was the constniction of an adequate septic system and that he was assured by a reliable conti^ctor it could be done. Kussell then explained that the reason for the ordinance covering filling was the Village's concern for t!ic lake, that ponds and wetlands prevent rapid riui off of water and act as a filtering agent to water entering Lake Minnetonka. McCarthy stated that so many applications for filling, similar to this, are being taken out, that some place a stand would have to be taken and lin'ss drawn and held so there would not be a wholesale filling of these lan>'s. niscussion was then held on the platting of 'iyrtlcwood ami tnat future nlatting should dcdicattt these lands construction could take place on them. Members concurred that there was no legal ground to deny the permit. Dongoskc moved, Eullbcrg seconded, to recommend approval* Motion, Ayes (S) - Hays (0). conditional use permit «S ’fyrtlewood Road h . Jfr« Sabor represented the Jehovah Witnesses ^|in an application for a conditional use permit to erect a church on Ella Gruppe^ property, part of Lot 7, Block 10, Langdon ; Park, 367S Togo Road. Along with conditional use permit, a proposed division of the property was also reviewed. > • (continued) CONDITIONAL H3E PERMIT 6 DIVISION 367S Togo Road If* ‘V ■ . r - . I 1 ■K W:T.- •) • •> f . « m^mrv>: >i>*!^ w l-;#^ S yfcVJ 1^ > is?^'3 i'fti-i •;» H1 1 > I net. :h« -n* t and .\w. r: 4- • .^<r ^, .. p«4^«•-»t * •‘ . ’$!'‘ *■'^T'"^isiisstjs -i ;/-*/: i' xc:^fC^. • If -A*'* • . ” . - . f J t • ''. ./■i.V*/ .’•^vVw/ . V-#- ----^ . * ^ ^ • •-» •>» . . ♦ -•DIVISION 3465 Sixth Avenue North vn « #• . •« *v V -y -t:Ty k .• - • • • *' vf lS »t 3t • . i- f * H * . • Lon Bd -*H t * '> S • •• '...^'•sv«y.-‘>r i.» .. I *^v # ’ V . *..**• :♦/ f { ^v V m^m k.*:: ^ ‘ '* % f vA: \ u , • I •*^• I i-^j i\‘ •• -r C w al 1 ‘.‘* ' “WSP.'T.< v» > .»■ .>jt‘. .**..». ^V-.. i’ ' :....^ r •JV; f :ri.: . •* • i.,sj.,,.y?.' »»!« .t • V * 0.,V/,vv V>v!,k L!>»:>5»KA ♦ *. *>iC-.KV'r V A •v: 'I . *•.- . ‘ r* • ■?: i.:ur^;i’ "^*?SsS- ^ >vv- ...■ >V - * .‘i* >;V^>K3 ^ > >v *.* .*. %l*• .J » fifcfcrVJ-y' *V ^!/ • ■ ^i. .'.■>? V'*'- Ji ■• •iK \ * •< » L- .' r-'* V ^1 *w. I V* A '» ; • /• I I n* r • 4 Motor Rod, Attorney Box S07Mound, Hlnnesote SSS64 Deer Roger: BBCloMd pi«M« n«<» *V»l**t» ; SSIlilitui»• ^nlt noulnd to pUeo ■ ehuteh »b • tooidoBtUl •*• 9 Si as fcu allMSU. ». ttUd toVt ^r Ijt. hew you ilni «•• pernlt to the Vlllege Council end Plennlng CcMiesi t^T epprorel. S“ " “ ifb? jS? risro ’fo, .;tt ««th*. co««eu egende* Sincerely yours. .’^r Nike Scheller INSPBCTXON DBPAWMIBNT HStet Enclosure r -‘■f • iJr.§ 10.20SEC. 10.20. R-IA ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Subd 1. Purpose. The "R-IA" One Family Residential J .. 4^4- -5 e -ini-ended to provide a district which will allow a combination of^low density residential development and limited combination or ±ow a ^ residential developments uay be rilowVd^by clnL^ion;i permit. The district shall have tWedilte access to highways and public sanitary sewer. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family Residentiafoistrict, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses; A. One family detached dwellings. B. Public owned parks and playgrounds. C. Municipal buildings. c.tViri Conditional Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family ResidentiaTDistkc"t”trs«ucture or land shall be used for the ?lllow"ng uses except by conditional use permit: & Schools Public schools and parochial or private schools ihich teach a l.lfo^anf lot provided no building ® °?p«*pistrict and that a fence be line of an abutting lot in ^ . g+.j-eet lot lines where the -ci nursery schools providing fifty square feet of playground space per pupil. -- B Churches. Churches including those related structur^s^ locaUd on the same "p%^^o^n"s“rl”atld ""to a the church proper, convents o „,._„jjed no building other than r^r^li^eLlThl^T be fo^a^Tv^ttJ ”ifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R District. r Clubs Carnes, etc. Golf courses, country clubs, tennis clubs, public swimming pools scout camps, YMCA camps, YWCA camps, . us’es. The principal profit parks, 1 "sted^ be 100 feet orstructure for any of the above list district, and accessory more from any abutting lot i feet from any lot line,structures shall be a minimum of fifty feet rrom any ORONO CC 279 (4-1-.C4) j: ■ Ml Smi [•itif Wtxa# riTO#] r«ns I l,^■^^ J|■■ s 10.61 for which work has uiresUacUire^is'started !iV*h?n“r* *»on't^s^VfV."r^ i6, 1967. and cootinces to cowplst• r Existing Parking Not to be Reduced. parking spaces and load^^^ u®nYe%“"L?S numVe” Exceeds the ?S,^^^.;V^trset"crtt herein for a similar new use. ____II £ 1 A ^D. Floor Area. -floor area purpose of calculating number of off-stre^^ floors, devoted ?hall be the office spaces, JSbr\VaVion“c?usiv%* of hallways, utility space, storage Other than warehousing. E. seat, in jJ“"?roc"V'Se“cfe\“%%Sl public assembly in which P*“?^*ies Hlh 22 inches of such seating determining requited parking. F. Sire of ®P„“/®*;„ty%\*’et^!n^irngt?tnd shall be not less than nine > -^gteiy by access drives. For each space shall be ^quirenents, one parking ;«pose^s of '»l=;;l«Hha^l eq2al%0 square feet of storage and M d* •■w —’ facilities ,cce°s•.or?r7e's^^ae';^U^^^^^^^^^ shall ^ parked or stored in a residentia ^,,3^ ^ne such loading, Unloading or of the owner or operator of the home occupation permitted for taa p principal building.DUlXuin^. . In .11 alst.lnn* •"*>1 requirements: ORONO CC 383 (4-1-84) L r § 10.61 A. -R" D tri^cts WithJ^®hV p'^remi^^ «c?A;/VtViTs v::ssVrr^ ”"Aa|ti| ?elt of Vn *int«iot side open^par" in*g" apVces on lots i“Jt“Sv%“f^:c%\ion":th.r tnan^^ El^o^t ”s*i5e\%t^“l'r tn^tl «?t“ in’^U^ feet of a rest lot Une. source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 B. «B* Districts. yg*a oc\andscaUn9 parking may •’*.*Y-°“®4.3? and "8-4" Districts s ■■■Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 C. -I- Districts. *V“eVt ^f^^^ any parking j^®iess^ than five feet from any u ?lght-o£-way except when a side ^be not lot line or ' Then, off-street parking shal iS2n%"en *^fee°t^Vr'o!n^Vaid lot lines.ten teec lluw ------------ '.“^„"i^*.*'4fntr“fiJ e\%ru*se^Vnd provided, A • ^ 1 ^I,4na space is within A. The proposed joint parkin, space thirty feet of the use it will serve. B. The epplicant(s) '^all sho«^«»%”'he%-o or the City /.“'"fJcilitlas^hall be a^reemtnt including the City. ORONO CC 384 (4-1-84) J s 10.61 e Krt *7 Control of Parking Facilities. When required rv iff-street parking facilities are provided accessory ®”®®J orincioal use served is located, written on the lot on which ^^X^nrooertv for off-street oarking shall be authority for using required number of off-filed with the City so as to maintain cnerequx principal use. siteet parking be located ^ore^fhar 100"’£.'“ from \he‘‘p^ nor mire then 300 feet from ISe principal use or building served. • «-,ll®S?l??!ctV°sV,Vrnot bl*rt\lfzed “^^rlren ?f“|ooS.*or for'the storage of vehicles which are Inoperable, fir lease, rent or sale. Subd. 9. Design and Maintenance of Parking Areas. . Parking areas shall be designed so as ro provide an aVegua^nrSeans of ac£ss to a public alley « s«ee^. public street. 1 When the determining of the Inln^^nc^^n^o^'*onn-h^^%“nr*‘mlr“^^"lll^“o« »P»«- necessary foraddition to accessory signs otherwise pet - . All of the area intended to beD. Surfacing. . r foe four or more vehicles ^S‘rflc*nS‘S!tn'’S^enu^^'o‘3rol dust and drainage. E. Lighting. “ nn%uecn^soutee l*f* light Sininim" t^"e p“utlic ri^hV-oV-wry or adlacent land. F. Curbing. lot^line shall provide a designed to have head-in ^heigh/and properly tire bumper or curb of J^®| project beyond the required ensure that no part of any car wix setbacks. subd. 10. ®“v'|d“iV as'’liit2l,' thi SllimuS 5Ir\\'.^g‘’Vacfllt!:.‘';ip.%“o;‘eriol.d, shall be as shown. t p^rdSru?:g'iiu.“"“' ORONO CC 385 (4-1-84) A s 10.61 C Motel, Motor Hotel, Motor Court or Hotel. Four sceces Plus at least one parking space for each guest room provided in the design of the building, D School, High School Through College. At least one parking space for each seven students based on design capacity plus one for each three classrooms. E. Churches, Auditoriums, ^”"1® Establishments. At least one parking space for each four seats based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall. F Theater, Athletic Field. At least one parking space for each six seats of design capacity. G. Community Center, Post Office, YMCA, YWCA, Physical Cultural Studio, square feet of ^?t«®are“.Tn excess oTf.OOO square reet of floor space in the principal At least one parking space for each three hospital beds. I Golf Courses, Country Clubs, Tennis principal structure. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 K Office Buildings and Professional Banks, savings *Insti°tut\'ons. ht least one parking space for each 200 square feet of floor area. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 t. Drive-ln nooV ar« i\**the bu'ildfnS!"’ space for each ht least six parking space, for each alley. M Mnfnr Setvlce Stations. At least three off-N. Motor service off-gtreet parking spacesstreet parking spaces plus two additional off street p for each service stall. service Establishments. AtO. Retail Sales and service^ ^ least one off-street parking space tor each 150 square floor area. ‘ “ ‘ " " ORONO CC 386 (3-1-84) OF OROHO ~ BDILDXKG PERMIT APPLICATION r-ee! Date P.eceived:_5_If^:^— :ared By:JZ^ Date Approved Pemit#I t«OBMAT10K host BB SOBMITTBD IH FOLl BEFOW REVIEW WILL BB STARTED L INFORMATION MD5 Check-off List Enclosed) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OWNER or CONTRACTORAPPLICANT IS: (circle one) SITE annpgSS g 36 5"^ ^ ^—C1X2JL^ ZIP: (work) j OF OWNER: LING ADDRESS PHONE: (home) CITF:ZIP: .\r*rQRg ^--------- JXHG ADDRESS: P/ piiVi Jif ^ TB LICENSE: # . PHONE 2 0,!^“ ^ ^ CI'TY: /V/Oc/«- ^ — TTTKCT/ENGxwmsil: LING ADDRESS:_ _ 'i___________________ PHONE: CITY:ZIP: KEGISTRATIOH #, POSED WORE (describe detail):. r*i1i C^0:J7 -IBS:SQ. FEET OF EACH FLOOR: 3F BEDROOMS: GARAGE STALLS: ATT.------- DET. -------------- ^ fCnON VALUATION (excluding land) . / ^ ' is Smplete and accurate? that th r state Building Jnd rCANT*S SIGNATURE: DATE: ^ 4k ▲ «OTT OF OROMO2750 Kelley Partway • P O. Box 815 Orono, Minnesota 55356-0815 (612) 473-7357 -E address T 3655 TOGO RO PERMIT TYPEPermit Number: Date Issued:12/15/3 S CH P.I.N.: 17-117 -23-31-0036 SCRIPnON: ADDITION Building Per nut Type Eiu i 1 d j ng Work T ype- UBC Occupancy ConG t r u c tion 1y r e Zoning INST-ADD/RENOOeL ADDITION A 2.1 VNL.r<-ic 7 MARKS: SEPARATE PERMIT REODIRED FOR ELECTRICAL (STATE) E SUMMARY: Base Fee Plan Review Surcharge Total Fee VALUAT1 0^' $198.00 $128.70 __$3^25 $335 95 $18,500 h^il: I.CITY OF L—^ FJA//M& OFFICE ^ J3J3JOO^^ iW.w’ 1222200000 '01 cEn ?.g €HEBK----S-—JJSi^/?£CEipr-rm yw 0292800 coot ROl T08:5 12/IS/9 553912470 FAIRVIEW LA MOUND MN 55364 (612) 472-1960 4v?TiE’uii!&MlSNeD?»«^E6YrREW^^ J^JftNrE^^TH^ALL'^CITY^O .?^0vS^' S WITNbSSES 3655 TOGO RD ORONO •* rT7T , *'y r ♦ 6. Connections to PuOiic Wacers. Excavations / *.w nurnose is connection to a public water* such asifgoons, and harbors, are prohibited above the H«eV li«l. such excavations below the elevation or the Ordinary High Water Level are subject to approval of tht SiMrt»e"„rot ^ Resources and other agencies withconcurrent jurisdiction e —--------------—--------------- j storm Water Management, The following general and specific StaKdards shall apply in addition to those standards fSund in Sections 10.55 and 11.41 of the Orono Municipal Code. 1. When possible, existing natural discharge to public waters. S 10.56 2 'a development roust be plannea an conducted in a manned ^aat will minimise the extent run-off velo^ties, erosion potential, and reduce and delay run-off volumes. Disturbed areas must be stabilised as soon as r-i*sible and facilities or methods used to retain sediment or the site. 3. When development density, topographic f .itures. and soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to adequately handle storm water run-off u*-®h *as inVrlliVi'. s:?Jtrn*g bVs\*ns,%^irinVretltes‘“dli». pipes and manmade materials and facilities. 4. When constructed facilities nerform water management, documentation must be provided by registered professional civil engineer that they are designed and initall^ consistent with the field office technical guide of the local soil and water conservation district. 5. New constructed storm water public waters roust provide for filtering or o ««SP« solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. HArdcov0r Lintiti3tions • 1. No hardcover or be placed, located, or constructed within 75 Ttairways High Water Level of any lake or tributary, Ihi lifts, landings, and lockboxes as regulated elsewhere in the Municipal Code. 2. Between 75 feet and 250 feet of there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. 500 feet of the OHWX. there shall theJa^ shal 1 be niBetween 500 feet and 1000 feet of the OBML there shall greater than 35% hardcover. Public Uses. M. Mt«Vi 1 4 4 Standards for Commercial, Public, and Semi- Surface water-oriented cosmercial uses and SB, wii-h similar needs to have access to and - *i* i?>*•:.*. Y I****- itX’ r ‘ >’CV! . ^ : ■^^5- »^jDSb*Ar «• »•% ^ -ite To;Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator COUHOlMCE^ifi OCT 2 4 199* an OF 01 From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator October 21, 1994 #1970 Scott Micliael Wold. 3026 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Petmil Resolution zoning District: LR-lCrequiring 1/2 acre in area. Tl« property consists of 26,771± s.f.. Additional Exhibits O - Andrew and Kristen Ronningen Utter of 10/13/94 p . Amended Grading Plan Brief Reyiew of Application 12. 1994. The »PP''=“* *“ ^tt is^ for new residential consinietion. Refer to can not be authortied *. uildt g P* wiihin the neighboring properly to the west. Exhibit I. note elevation changes ate pr^ „„ Lot 2 of the Itelly Second Addition on Casco Applicant plans to construct a new resid^ ^ ^ 2 of ^ of awroximately 450 cubic yards Point. Soil borings for»«'Oonsttuct.on^l fo^^ot^^^^^ ^ored to K^^^esi^ until an appropriate suge in constiuction with the restoration of yard. Review Exhibit H. GusUfton did no. accept «he original proposed an underground tile at west lot line conv^ g ® ^ would not be Engineer was Review Exhibit P. Applicant has Please review Exhibit O. the neighbors to tte grading plan. The ameiried plan ™«cavate poor soils for building pad. The City rrd‘.!r:rrg'ra« St^t^bach variances for a lot cre,«d in a recent subdivUion when there is no real hardship. Ks •*“ ***““ ■“* legal description for the drainage easement. •.HIM mTHi:*L': > mm wo ^rrrmiK ViKl Tnr» Th< *1 ."t M ■TiTiT ' M I M I ^ J iBIf r#r-r«Mp. TmiN A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.C3, SUBDIVISION 21 niKNO. 1570 WHEREAS, Scott Michcal Wold (hereinafter the "applicant") has an interest m the property located at 3026 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter City ) a legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, Kelly Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesoto (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a coi^itional u» to permit filling and grading activities not authorized under the normal actiWties allowi^ with a building permit for new residential construction per Mumcipal Zonmg Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 21. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1970. The property is located in the LR-IC Lakeshore Residential Zoning Dismet requiringlufiO s.f. or 1/2 acre in area. The property consiste of approximately 26,771 s.f. On October 17, 1994, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed tte^^ as proposed and recommended approval of an amentW plan tem!^iSry stockpiling of approximately 450 cubic yards of excavated beneath the proposed house pad. m shown City Engineer, Shawn Gustafson, the approved amen^ on Page 5 of this resolution provides for a swale to the lakeside of the residence that will maintain positive drainage for both the ^ and the existing residence on Lot 1, Block 1. Kelly Second Addition. Page 1 of 5 4 The Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow gradi^ as tJa and ttot Uie level of use of the pro^ »ill be m l^ing the intern and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5 The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by Ctt^^ff. by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Ororo Dty erants a conditional u« permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03 Subdivision 21 to permit filling and grading activities on Lot 2, Block 1. irsubicct^to the authorized under a building permit for new construction. This appro/al is subject to tnc following conditions: 1. 2. 3. care be given to the erosion control provided and mamumed ad^m to temporary srockpile area of excavated material in order to ensure drainageway along cast lot line of Lot 2 is protected. Owners of Lots I and 2, Block 1. Kelly Second Addition shall jointly apply for a land alteration permit to be obtained before final grading can begin. Applicant shall grant a 10’ wide drainage easement over drainageway in lakeshore yard. Page 2 of 5 ( The City Engineer in his report of October 5. 1994 advises applicant of his concern with boring information from soil boring n in a report by Advance Surveying & Engineering. Organic clays of this type are compressible and subject to settlement when used for foundations. Authorities granted by this refolution run with the property not with the owner but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a land permit (general permit) with the City within one year of the date of Council jjproval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (October 24, 1995). Violation of or noiKOinpliaiice with any of the terms and conditions of tte resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigi^ hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the cham of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of October, 1994. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 5 f I .STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instniment was acknowledged before me on this Wth day of October, 1994 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and ^**^5**^*^^!?*^ City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 , before me a Notary Public |^n*to me tob^Sc p^^ dereribS in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known E> ine to be Uie person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instniment. and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 ond chonge by the City Engineer. Building Dept., developer ond owner. Proposed grades and house locotion which ore opproved by the City are final. NOTE: A REVISED SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE WILL PREPARED after the soil CORRECTIONS TO THE LOT HAS TAKEN PLACE. fv! / / / F. / DRAWAC.t k utility ^ EASCMENT ^/// / SILT FENCE « / PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT I * 'exist 2 STOR' CAR. /BO*2232*/y LO" kt>.7TT 94I.S /B % u.?) PROPOSCO HOUSE (934?) / .........1 5 00 I ^^-r L.V_/ I PPr^pnSFD IQ FOOT n*^*'*^*^^ FASEMENT . 7 /© Thot port of Lot 2. Block I. KELLY 2ND »7 • ADDITION, oecording to the recorded plot /P#♦ thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesoto. lying [942(0) ^*2 TEV^^fS AINApr A yiLITV »}9.0 \, .939^ . , 5.00 feet on eoch side of o centerline JjJjit described os commencing at the most p 93}w|Ie^ westerly corner of soid Lot 2; thence •O northeosterly. olong the northwest line of fip said Lot 2. 0 distonee of 1 00.00 feet; thence eosterly deflecting to the right 60 degrees 22 minutes 32 seconds o distonee of I02.A8 feet to the easterly line of soid Lot 2 ond soid centerline there terminoting. The sidelines of soid eosement ore prolongeo or shortened to terminote ot said north­ westerly ond eosterly lines of Lot 2. S60*03 ’04“W ^ SILT FENCE** ® 'Oj> *«• (O 9001 E. Bloomington freewoy (35W) Bloomington. MM 65420 [612) eai-2455 We hereby certify thot this is o true ond correct representotion of o survey of the boundones of the lond obove described ond of the locotion of oil buildings, if ony. from or on soid lond. Doted this 29th doy of August . 1994 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING. jNC. Bv: ^1L —_________ lldwor*d~H. Sunde. R.L S. Minn. Reg. No. 8612 REVISED: October 20, 199* — Updote per city Pa^ 5 of 5 To: r i From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator October 12, 1994 #1970 Scott Micheal Wold, 3026 Casco Point Road - Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC requiring 1/2 acre in area. The property consists of 26,771 s.f. Application: The Building Official has called for the filing of a conditional use permit as filling proposed cannot be covered under the authority of a building permit. Refer to Exhibit I. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review. 1. Section 10.02, Definition 13. Determination of Building Height - The vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or 10 above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Topographic changes which elevate tl« adjoining ground level above the existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building height. It has been determined at 22.5 . Refer to Exhibit M. 2. Section 10.03, Subdivision 21- As already noted above, the filing and grading activities have been determined to be not covered under the normal building permit as land alterations involve not only property but property to the west. 3. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75 ’ area - 6,371 s.f. No hardcover proposed. 75-250’ setback area = 20,400 s.f. Allowed = 5,100 s.f. Proposed = 4,286 s.f. or 21.01% No variance is required. List of Exhibits Application Addendum Property Owners ’ List Plat Map Neighbor’s Letter to Neighboring Property Owner to West and to City \\ h ' Zoning File #1970 October 12. 1994 Page 2 F - Hardcover Site Plan Hardcover Fact Sheets Gustafson Report 10/5/94 Grading and Drainage Plan Soil Boring Report Boring Map Preliminary Grading Plan Submitted with Preliminary Subdivision Street Elevation-Height Determination Side and Rear Elevations Description of Request Applicant proposes construction of a new residence that will require removal of approximately 450 cubic yards of poor soils and replacement with suitable granular material. Review Exhibit I. Applicant will store fill during construction to the southwest comer of the property. Review the grading plan. Exhibit I. changes in elevation must provide positive drainage away from structure directing drainage to ditch along the east side of property line. Note grade changes at the south and east side of garage on property to west. The plan would bring drainage to a catch basin that would drain via an underground tile across the rear yard of the subject property to the drainage ditch at the east. Review Exhibit H. The Engineer is concerned that the proposed grading plan will not provide draiiuge or retemion during heavy storms to protect lower level of garage on lot to the west. The proposed elevations will not maintain the natural drainage to the east. Gustafson recommends that applicant provide a modified drainage swale instead of the underground pipe. He notes that if applicant prefers the underground pipe system, that applicant ’s engineer provide the necessary hydraulic information to assure that it is designed to cany a 100-year storm frequency with a high water level at least one foot below the garage floor. The City will ask for a permanent drainage easement over the drainageway at a minimum width of 10*. Gustafson also cautions the building department in reviewing the foundation plans noting the results of soil boring #2 and advises of a potential senlement problem. The City is in receipt of a supponive letter from Mr. Terry Lindgren (owner of property to west) who supports the request to alter elevations on his property. Both Mr. Wold and Mr. Lindgren will be required to file for a joint land alteration permit from the City when final site grading commences next spring. Zoning File 4^1970 October 12, 1994 Page 3 Staff Recommendation To recommend approval of the grading and drainage plan provided by Edward H. Sun^ the conceptual grading plan involving both Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Kelly 2nd Addition, su jec to the following conditions: 1 Prior to application being scheduled before the Council, applicant must provide a final grading plan setting forth the method of conveying drainage from lower elevations at walkout on Lot 1, Block 1 through Lot 2 to the eastern drainageway. This shall be achieved via an above ground drainage swale or below ground tile system If below ground tile system is proposed, applicant must provi^ the necessary hydraulic information for City Engineer’s review. In any case, before scheduling of this application before Council, the City Engineer must have the fjial grading plan to review and approve. 2 Erosion control shall be installed and maintained around temporary stockpile of spoils. Erosion control shall be mainuined as shown on the gradmg plan and as required by the City suff or City Engineer throughout duration of the building project and until namial groundcover is restored to all disturbed areas. 3 Both owners of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Kelly 2nd Addition shall joinUy execute a land alteration permit to be obtained at the City before final gradmg can begin. 4 Others recommended by Planning Commission members. IN ( • ■'% •:• * Z .''* V*- crrv OF ORONO - general land use PROPERTY location Site Address A Type of Application to be Filed Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)in-2 i 3V « APPLIC Name Address7ctpo*l^<^.1 <kcW* /V Phone (home) 2. Pho^^(w^) OWNER (if different than applicant) Name A-ysrv.>^— (homeX Phone (work) Address DaieProperty Acquired 1 (do) ^6 n^also own tdjacem parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use ' $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/lndusirial Use v/ $200.00 t^nd Alteration ^ . ^^tading and filling - designated wetland or floodplam "■JTorading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or inore Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakesbore ■pRD/PlD - see Fee Schedule ........................ $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from origiiial ^plication) ~ After-the-Fact Fee - Double Cunent Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule present use of property Present Zoning District - I Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify). (month/year) CITY ijf f^imcs OFFICE 1300200000 01 CES iHlCK 71 i(tCEIPr-m^F rOii S313710 cool iiOi T14^ v,V* /)/“ oc . .• / / V ' 'M ^ICE •/.V* /V«:.W« VV 200.0C K YQL> ~>i rii-i.*A f A'i* 09/09.- ' ♦ '■ Des«^ req^* >“■+- Pmneitv Owoers List 8. // Compierea ^ ^ 5**^ S«n^*^^ieis list of owners within 350’ (yon can obtain this list tom infonnation. o„nlication if not included on required survey. fmarital satus) of all persons with an intetest in tte Topograpnic survey yp^a*^ — r 5S“SSS-i=s'ss.sr=:s=->“iS' ^ srrSJS iKSSTp" .1 you wish notified of this application.------ you wish notified of this appin^diwu. YOU AKE WUI %to » scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) ;ssr.SJS:n,£s.^i» Si."' w cM»i D»««« ~ ___________ Initials of Clerical Staff:------------------------------------ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE . reouired or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees “ time not covered by original fe« Administrator, agrees and/or unusual expenses incurred “ ^wledge. Date ^ Owner ’s signatur ^^^[tfM^^q^ WY^b<iu L ^ ' .,1. w.«nin« Commusion Meenng. Plsoninf of «*»«• change prior to the meeting. Sniide U Inc b wm%me%PAL% EOWAnOH SUNOC RLS PAESIOENT JOHN K BAflNFS B t S SB V<CE mark S HANSON R L S SR VICE PRES SCOTT i SOUKUP R L S VICE PRES 9001 E. Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, MN 55420 (612) 681-24SS FAX 612/888-9526 September 12, 1994 land surveying land Title surveys CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING CAD SERVICES r I' ^ CITY OF ORONO Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota S5323 Attention: Ms« Jeanne Mabusth. Bldg. & Zoning Administrator Re: Conditional Use Permit for Grading & Filling on Lot 2, Block 1, KELLY 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Mn. Dear Ms. Mabusth: Enclosed are the following: 1. ) A photographic reproduction of the Certified Plat Map 2. ) A copy of the September 1990 Preliminary Plat land grading Plan as submitted to the City in September of 1990. A "Certificate of Survey* prepared by Sunde Land Surveying, Inc. showing the proposed house. It is my client ’s desire to apply for a Conditional Use Perinit in order to excavate the basem^ and foundation of the proposed home which he is building on this property. D^ to the soils located underneath the house pad, it will require approximately 450 cubic yards of poor soils to be excavated and replaced with suitable material in order to prepare the house pad for actual construcuon. My client wants to store the excavated materials on the southerly and westerly side of the houte until the foundation has been brought up to grade and the soils from the excavation will thra w ^read around the house for backfilling purposes. In order to control and retain any and all runoff which may occur from the excavation area, my client will place a silt fence as shown on the survey in order to contain any erosion runoff. Should excess materials be encountered and severe overages occur in tne excavation area, this excess materia) will be trucked to an off site area. Soil borings in the area indicate an approximate depth of 6 feet of poor materials and this will ^ exchanged for crushed rock or recycled concrete underneath the house pad a^. The wickwed Preliminary and Grading Plan prepared by Ron Krueger & Assoc, and as submitted in ^piem^r IW for review by the city Staff, indicates a walkout house pad is appropnate for this Ij. and after my evaluaUon of they property, I have concurred that a walkout will be suitable for this lot. The grading that is being considered will not adversely affect any adjoining property or street right-of-ways. . SMI-a* »■m.irm*n•yrj i ' V;tt;; tS-ll7-n OOM S(NM MOMSS UNttStOCOWiiBSiii rasnmo unoNBMSXN rasraiTCO UNO NOT rai SAUASMS tUTIR XN URi NfM:..A>w-h- ■Sl:,tS^117«tS At OOSSsmi xvT n NiMMUtS miU JR IfiiVIR ‘ V HflMRRUn NM.U JR i n .1 itii iw St NMIATA m ■''iia; snn NCttCSXN COUNTY SROSIRTY INFORMATION SYSTCN SROSfRTV OMCRS LISTSO tO-117>tS At OOtt OMtS tW St 0 L CUMNINBS ANN CtMONBS OANtiL t A NARTHA'n CUMNINBSsits XW StNAVZATA Wl 5SSnSO te-117>tS AX OOSS OSOAO CASCO SOXNT RO J N HDOAN ITAt JOIM A SUMN H06AN AASt MRSON AVI S MSIS HN iSAOA f j ^ 1.1 a ISf, tt-lX7*» AS 00S7 , MM . > SOtSS AOORtSS UNASSXSNIO A V fU^R IT At CO-TRUSnt» rV Am otflviR i ttA# I tfm tr . mlMNs m sstaa N/ • S . SS’ .r tO-117-tS AS OOAA nlt7 CASCO CXR MIMRRINA A Mil INIIT VfRr- .SANA A NAtMRAST tt07 CASCO CXRCLI 4>: NMZATA Mi SSS91 V * < mu RNM S , v,{ M‘ tO*U7-tS AS OOAt SSSS9 CASCO CXR t, ’ ^ 'SSH CASCO ClRCtl {if. • 7? 1- V '. tOTAt SATCM » t SRIfSTAB MCO ClRCtl iTA HN SBSn 002 0005S i', • so t0-ll7-ts AS OOAt 0St77 CASCO CXR LEI OCXMIRT ETAL Ul CIINIRT St77 CASCO llANI NAVZATA Mi SSS9X SO tO«117>tS AS 00A5 0St97 CASCO CIR 0 A N OAS OANXIL 0 A HAOOMtt J OAS StAt CASCO CIRCLE NAVZATA Mi S5ST1 SO tO-IXT-tS AS OOSl OSOSA CASCO SOXNT RO T N STA7P0R0 A C A STAF70R0 TNOHAS N STASFORO SOSA CASCO SOXNT RO NAVZATA Mi SSSAX RISORT NO. SXASSAOlSAME i •■SO t0>117-ts At OOSA OSSAS IW |iL JE7FRIV A OESSA OAMIRRV JEFFRlV A DISRA OAIMIRRV SSAS tVT St ^NAVZATA Ml ISSnSS tO-tl7-tS AS OOSA OSOSO CASCO SOXNT RO 0 L A J 0 OXOOS SlMCTT t A JILL C 6XBSS SOSO CASCO SOTNT RO . NAVZATA Mi SSSOl SO tO-U7-tS AS OOAS 0SZ77 CASCO CXR LEE OIXNERT ITAt LIE CIXNERT St77 CASCO UNI NAVZATA Mi USOl . SO t0-117-ts AS 0040 OSSOB CASCO CXR . 0 V NELSON A tt R NltSON BRIAN V I SAMi R NELSON SSOS CASCO CiR ■ NAVZATA Mi SSSn SO t0>117-ts AS OOBA 0SS09 XW St N I LANS AOS OOMU THONAS A UXSIL CON SS09 XW St NAVZATA Ml BBSOl .• V ! Vv1W.* 'i;i !3§'’ • I^ ‘ J • .; ^ A i *.‘ >' ' . ^ ''iV •■ - •' '^'Ii ; •• • «»,• ♦ ♦ .pi. •' V V v.v• ’ )*; • ’bm A r ' lb'- - • ■ i '¥mm . is rA'^ fK ^ MTt tvt4m'fS2■ *?s ;r-frJ ■=>yk M^ .tt*117-» 51 005* 0t4*i CMCO OOINT m •dMfir C UOXNSRI «N0 MI71 MMIIT C U01N9KXto4o cMco pomr mudlUmTA Ml 555015^ ; M'lir-n 51 00*1 OtfOO CASCO FOXNT Ml C N MMCR A 0 HUUCN HAACK 6 jl WUGR A 0 MUUm HAACK tooo CASCO munt mi NAVIATA Iff 55501 •.Vi 55 .t0>117*t5 SA 0005 oitis CASCO ooiNr so R • UURII iTAL R O UIURII 5015 CASCO or RO NAOIATA Ml 55501 HCMCPXN COUNTY OROPIRTV INFORHATXON SYSTEM OROOCRTY OWCRS LIST50 t0>117>t5 51 0030 OtOOO CASCO POINT RO ORAOLAY C OARKC ORAOLfV C OAKRE '5517 OIRCHCREST OR NAYZATA Ifl 5550150 tO-117-a 54 OOOl 05055 CASCO POINT RO T OCRTNlAUMi/C RACHCNHCZSTCR THOMAS 0 OERTHIAUNE 5055 CASCO POINT ROAD NAYZATA MN 65501 50 tO>117-U 54 0005 05005 CASCO POINT RO CURnS J INBLUND ETAL CUOnS J ENOLUNO 5005 CASCO PtUNT RO NAYZATA m 55501 REPORT NO. P14S5401PROS50 tO>117*E9 51 00*0 02070 CASCO POINT RO J t 0 NARTINStM JERRY A OOMIX^ NARTZNSON 2070 CASCO POINT RO S NAYZATA HN 5550158 ZO-117-25 54 0002 05025 CASCO POINr RO R 0 NfcOAtM « C L NC8ANN THEODORE EDIN 5025 CASCO PtaNT RO NAVZAtA 101 15501 58 20-117-2it 54 0010 05085 CASCO POINT Ro OLORIA 8 OOTRENROTR REN • LAURA oOtZENROTH 3085 CASCO PT RO NAYZATA m 55501 :• rJ- • *.• **• H»MPAVER■P“ ii; i'm jKI mor Ir nw iKStVSL -V IMPAVtR MNi/AR ^ *<“**. c si ’-'' ' '' 58. 20-117-25 54 0011 M0A5 CASCO POINr RO R J JEROEE E J 7 JEROEE RdRERT 0 A JEAM« JEROEE 50A5 CASCO POINr ROAD NAVZATA m 55501 5i 20-117-25 54 0018 05855 CASCO POINT M JOHN P OEMas ETAL JOHN P t EVY C DENNIS H81 CASCO POINT ROAD MAVtATA IM 15501 It 20-117-25 54 0025 05020 CASCO POINT RO B intOREII JR A 8 LINDOREN I AINDBREN JR A 8 LINOOREN lice CASCO POINr RO 55501 58 20-117-25 54 0012 05045 CASCO POINT RO R A KASTENS A 8 C HASTENS RJCHARO A/8AR8ARA C KASTENS 5045 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA Ml 55501 38 20-117-25 54 0025 02087 CASCO POINT RO JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JANES R A CATHERINE HARTZEU 2087 CASCO Pt RO NAYZATA Mi 55501 58 20-117-25 54 002* 0502* CASCO POINT RO SCOTT N NOLO SCOTT N NOLO 0720 DORSET LA EOEN PRAIRIE MN 55547 58 20-117-25 54 0017 050*1 CASCO POINT RO OORIS N0LZT0R>4UTERS TOOO NATERS ' 50*1 CASCO POINT RO NAVZATA Ml 55501 58 20-117-25 54 0024 05005 CASCO pomr ro JANES R A CATHBRZNB HARTZELL JANES R A CATHERIM HARTZELL 2087 CASCO PT RO NAYZATA NN 55501 58 20-117-25 54 0027 00058 ADDRESS PEND1N8 JAMES R A CATHERINE HARTZELL JAICS.R A CATHERIM HARTZELL 2087 CASto PMNT RD NAYZAtA Ml 55501 jr'; A ’'I, C • " ■ ^4 * •I *• :;VK: :;\n • ■' 'r’ ft • »• . ^ L IntomMon OlstribuUon Systems S SsrWcss ... fcitoractfv* tel date bat# and tefoimatfon canter a ■\.o ^ 3a2-C> C ^ Softt A>^/4C Arr**~ _ 1~T±rs/UU-f OC^k 4^^^ •/o /^< *4/^ z*'^' T’^fc'dvey L 4A/0^f&f^ 4ft/ ^ Sales; 612-471-8482 - FAX 612-471-8454 3020 Casco Point Road. Wayata. Minnesota 55391 Fdr an Max eair 6 f2-47f4)M3k Gd. lOf (haxayoiirMX # raa^> MOTES A lTr.FND CONS TRUC NON PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 933.6 Denotes existing elevation (933.6) Denotes proposed elevation Proposed garage floor elevotion = 942.5 Proposed front house entry elevotion = 945.0 Proposed top of block elevotion s 944.0 Proposed bosement floor (wolkout) elevotion = The proposed elevations and proposed house locotion are subject to review end chonge by the City Engineer. Building Dept., developer ond owner. Proposed grades and house location which are opproved by the City ore flOfli. Lot 2, Block I, Kelly 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plot thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 935.0 NOTE: A REVISED SURVEYOR’S CERTIFICATE WILL BE PREPARED AFTER THE SOIL CORRECTIONS TO THE LOT HAS TAKEN PLACE. I r\-r L.W I imI, according to the ounty. Minnesoto. CALcotmrTo^ 0 t n«i\uwi SETBACK ZONE:(circle oneiC0*75^ 75-250^250-500* 500-1000* Existing Hardcover in Zone X «_ S.F, A« HOUSE . LENGTH width y O », S.F. _ S.F. - X .. - --—-m _ S.F. X m _S.F. m _ S.F. E« uARAOE . c. Driveway w _ S.F, 9 _ S.F. 0. Sidewalk X --m S.F. X m S.F. __ S.F. e. Patio/ Deck m ■ S.F. F.Landscape AREASunderlain m _ S.F. X 9 _ S.F. BY -PLASTIC SHEETING _ S.F. X .. —--_ S.F. y - --- - _ S.F. Q« UTHCR m % if_ _w o m S•P• lOTAL WARDCOVER i"1 Total Property Area in Zone Is.r. -/ fe37l X 100 0.00 % ,X •s • r • , nuudc: _—------------—— LENGTH WIDTH 0 & ___X /6 >10^S.F . 0)X ri3‘'i S.F. ■ ^X S * F • X S.F. §T zzzz. X X iZ XZ. z(oH He*-!.S.F. uARAOc \y — ^1^^ # A WL 1 ^ J X \H00 S.F. X S.F. •\ }2 X 3S S.F. u ID c WAL n - X S.F., X S.F. >ATIO/ ^ D eck __ t A A ^ 2i X .lb*S.F. X s Z^6 S.F. LANu5CArt'"-sC -------- AREAS UNDERLAIN X S.F. ft Y PLASTIC SHEETING X S.F. X S.F. D tue p X S.F. f u Zone HZSo S.F. lOTAL nAKULUVcrt iri Total Property A rea in Zone ‘ 20. MOO S.F . J/ll Bonestroo MLm RDsene Anderlik& ^1 Associates Engineers & Architects October 5. 1994 OHO G BonettiDOL Booert W •oier'e »*€ * joieph C Andeh*. Marvel I SorvM P€ E<naitl E Turner FE C^rm E COOA FE Tr^mai € Noyei FC ■oeerr G Vhurvcm fe Sus^ M EOerw>. C FA •$emor Cor>iutar^ Hoevaid A VihM. F€ ice«ch A Goetorv fe itooe^ E F^p^^he FE Acfvpid W Eonet. FE O LOSkoCJ FE fioben C 9 jwk a i a jerty A loutlon F£ Mart A Hamon. FE M<naei T lauvnarw fe Ted K F€«l fe Tnomji i Andenon. A i A OooMl C 0<^9a«dt FE Thomas A Syfka Ff FietJenc J Venoor^. FE •smaei MarteieL PE Mchaei F Fau FE Agrvs M tmg AlC F Thomas W hPifnon. f| ISAchJt* C Lyncn FE James » Maiand FE jffty o ^rnsch. fe Scon J Ai^anefc. FE Kenneth f Andenon FE Mark ff Mi FE Mart A Se« FE Gary W Monm FE FaU J Gannon A i A Oan«« J Edgenon. FE A ffck khmidL FE Fha^ J Cas^veff. FE Mars O waiii FE M*s 0 Jensen FE t Fhdp Grem FE ffjien I Mir*men Ff Ovy O itnatM fe F ToddFodet FE KMh ff vaoa fe OoutfSt J eenoc FE Sh*wn O GuMwn FE CecFO OhAfr FE FaM G Neuer FE John F Oorder. FE CharirsA fncison UoM Fawerviy Harlan M Orson James E Engemaidi Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Wold Residence File No. 139-1970 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the grading and drainage plan for the proposed rnideDce at 3026 Casco Point Road. We are concerned that the proposed grading will hl«k the natural drainage from Lot 1 to the existing drainage ditch along the east ^ of Ut 2. 1 has a walkout garage at a relatively low elevation. The grading shwid provide a positive overUnd drainage route from the gmage to the ditch. M the is Ml ^-ble. thVdrainage from Lot 1 should be picked up with a pipe designed to carj^ a 10^ 5^ stonn frequency with a high water level at least one fMt below the A ^rmnnent easement for drainage and utility purposes should be provided to the City along the proposed drainage route. We have reviewed the soil borings and have some concerns about the organic clay in #2. Generally, this type of soil is compressible and will experience some settlement h used for a foundation. If the house is not designed to adapt to this settlement, there may be future problems. We recommend that the building inspector use great care and judgement during the inspection process. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 233S West Hlgriw^ 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 ¥VUL.U NOTES & LEGEND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 933.6 Denotes existing elevotion (933.6) Denotes proposed elevotion Proposed garage floor elevotion = 942.5 Proposed front house entry elevotion = 945.0 Proposed top of block elevation * 944.0 Proposed basement floor (walkout) elevotion = 935.0 The proposed elevations and proposed house location ore subject to review ond change by the City Engineer. Building Dept., developer and owner. Proposed grades and house location which ore opproved by the City ore lioaL- Lot 2. Block I. Kelly 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plot thereof, Hennepin County. Minnesota. NOTE: A REVISED SURVEYOR’S CERTIFICATE WILL BE PREPARED AFTER THE SOIL CORRECTIONS TO THE LOT HAS TAKEN PLACE. UJ s II Xoz I nrr L.\J I < 1^211according to the >unty, Minnesota. advance surveying & ENGINEERING CO. \ ^V^ING / ENGINEERING / GEOTECHNICAL 5300 Highway 101 South. Minnetonka. MN 55345 Phone 474 7964 Fax 474 8267 April 8,1994 ft Mrs. Carol Kelly 3026 Casco Point Road Orono, Mn Phone: 473-9936 Dear Carol: TOe fSng is a tabulation of data about your site: 3026 Casco Point Road Orono, Minnesota Lot 2. Block 1. Kelly 2nd Addition Elevations provided by client the North American Datum Site Address: Cil Legal Description: Benchmark: Datum: METHODS: The investigation consisted of exploratory soil “ identifying soU and water contfitions. ^e have md^ approximate locations of the^ borings on an attached p Elevations are very approximate. Borings were taken with a truck mounted p4E 45 drill “'"I solid %tem continuous-flight augers. Sods enco^tered m the borings were visually and manually examined in the j soils “ngineer. TTie "soils are classified on the b«.s °f plastricify in accordance with ASTM Unified So^ aassificiion System" and a chart explaming that system is attac RECOMMENDATIONS: The firm, grey clay encountered in Soil Boring No. 1 at an elevation of 929 and the finn, black clay in Soil Boring 2 at an elevation of 930 is suitable for the support of a home. It is our opinion that these soils are capable of supporting footings proportioned to exert a bearing pressure of no more than 3000 pounds per square foot. The soft clays, fill soils, and the top 1 foot of the firm, black clay are not suitable and should be removed by excavation fi’om the area of the proposed home and fi-om an oversize strip around the perimeter of the home of one foot in width for every foot from the footings down to the firm soil. Granular fill may then be imported and compacted in layers to support the home. The granular fill should consist of 100% crushed granular material meeting the Miimesota Department of Transportation's Class S specification. The most economical and suitable material for this purpose is usually recycled concrete. The fill should be placed and leveled in the excavation in layers no thicker than 2 feet and the surface compacted using a suitable vibratory roller until no further settlement is noticeable from further passes of the roller. When the fill has reached basement footing level, the home may be built using conventional techniques except that the garage floor must be supported by piers per the attached detail. ... • *l:'‘. K ’ i >’. . .. c, V' f - ;vt 'V :i.: • ’•* ■’> i i s* I i, . i; I .. ! » ■ ■ HA VAtii ■ri-iBi ■Diti i 3552S1 ■ ■ f I IBi KB I 1 1 1 IBlKB I 1 1 1 ■ B 1 I t I r I I I I ■ iirmj:i I lai :s» ]:::hiw ««i IR ■ri & j|:i ji|| ;u£»ie[ ■ DB !■ I liilm\ •c •» *« October 13,1994 r « • m MM uu Msa HIND r 3 Ms. Jeanrw A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Wold Residence #1970 our .moor. conc«n about^ ™ tor 3026 Casco Point Road. Wa strongly urge Iho usa parm« and not allow «a. radical alternation of the land, drainage of the entire area. Wa hava saan firsmand Iha natural flow of ma drai^dirt^^ Muding «ia Spring malt and summer rainstomis. Tha lot is cu^ aw tying lSa"^r^SSS;«^ clay from the other side of Casco Point Road and Maple Lane^w p^v" composition of tha soil, as you know. Iheraf^ changes in the landscape will ad^e^ ^ proposed excessive fill will block drainage from Lot 2®, creatingSKa remaining drairmga to Channel down the other side of Lot 2. creating unnecessary erosion. Wa have no complaint with the construction of a house on L<« 2 nw witt^ ViVZ NS oonsm*tion oomp^t Sm^t^t Z S?“proJJe tosS^. -til vw^ild become a very expensive surprise for the new owner. '' r‘ ? Hm™ l« itoiolv no Mtiliable reason to raise th« elevsiion o» the land an ^ Jhen the house can be buMt etoser to the ro^ ^ daiMoelo the tasidl The tot stopes dwenwarO ftwn the roaO and the sort son and^ toward the lake, to where stoindinfl w^ is SSTi^ sSh to the first 75 «eel front shore. Mowng the hou» vnU S?SKSCUeh.n«tt of thto proposed house on the propel LOt1 Please consider our requestto protect this land and to permtt a reasoiw^ buiWtog^TSS dow^ drastically alter the topography or cause problems tor future residents. Sincer^. ^ Andrew end Ki1«4n Ronrwigen MQTg^ in LEGEND 933.6 Denotes existing elevotion (933.6) Denotes proposed elevation Proposed garage floor elevation = 942.5 Proposed front house entry elevotion = 945.0 Proposed top of block elevation = 944.0 Proposed basement floor (walkout) elevation = 935.0 The proposed elevotions and proposed house location are subject to review ond change by the City Engineer. Building Dept., developer ond owner. Proposed grodes ond house location which ore opproved by the City ore liiia! PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 2. Block I. Kelly 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesoto. NOTE: A REVISED SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE WILL BE PREPARED AFTER THE SOIL CORRECTIONS TO THE LOT HAS TAKEN PLACE. I r\-r -7 I F(V>T DRAINAGE EASEMENT That port of Lot 2. Block I, KELLY 2ND \ IkiR ADDITION, according to the recorded plot ^ thereof. Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying ^ Illy ® centerline nyiirJ* described os commencing ot the most westerly corner of soid Lot 2; thence L*0 northeosterly, along the northwest line of soid Lot 2. 0 distonce of 100.00 feet; thence eosterly deflecting to the rl^t 60 degrees 22 minutes 32 seconds o distonce of IC2.48 feet to the eosterly line of sold Lot 2 and soid centerline there termlnoting. The sidelines of sold eosement ore prolonged or shortened to terminote at soid north* westerly and eosterly lines of Lot 2. ^^0*03*04"W SILT fence " ^2.19 According to the nty, Minnesoto. S DRAIMACE FA^niTMT Block I. KEUY 2ND I to the recorded plot ounty. Minnesoto. lying side of o centerline encing ot the most Mid Lot 2: thence the northwest line of nee of 100.00 feet; lecting to the right 60 32 seconds o dtetonee le eosterly line of sold Hiine there terminotlng. rosement ore prolonged minote ot sold north- y lines of Lot 2. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNOLMEEnrj OCT 2 4 1^94 OTYOFORONO DATE: October 20, 1994 ITEM NO.; Department Approval: Name Jeume A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1974 Tyler Corbin, 4685 North Shore Drive > Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Additional Exhibit K - Applicant’s Request to be Scheduled at the October 24th Meeting Zoning District: LR-IB, requiring 1 acre in area. Total area of property = 28,550 s.f. or .66 acres. Brief Review of Application Council may review enclosed staff memo dated October 12, 1994 for more background on factual aspects of this review. Applicant’s contractor was in the process restoring deteriorating timber retaining walls within the lakeshore yard when inspectors asked that all work cease until appropriate pennits were obtained. The contractor had already removed a timber staircase within the lakeshore yard that was also in disrepair. Major portions of the retaining walls are located within the 0-75’ setback area, review Exhibit J. Review Exhibit I, the City Engineer did not approve the original plan for retaining wall reconstruction as the upper level wall and east side of boulder wall would exceed a 4’ height. Review Exhibit F, Gustafwn recommends that if a wall was to exceed a 4’ height that a modular masonry block wall be used in its place. The Engineer provided another option advising that if grading above the walls could be modified so that no wall would exceed 4’ in height, applicant could proceed with boulder wall installation. Applicant submitted an amended plan. Exhibit J, providing for three tiers of boulder retaining wall with 4’ wide spacing. The walls will not encroach any closer to the lakeshore. The City Engineer approved the revised plan, review Exhibit E. Other Issues Major increases in hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area proposed at a 14.8% increase result with the installation of the access stairs (620 s.f. or 8.5%). Note existing hardcover did not record extensive timber access stairs that had already been removed by applicant. The Planning . ; Request for CouncU Action continued page 2 of 2 October 20, 1994 Zoning File #1974 —---------------- u/ith the excessive hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback area proposed U w^difficult for members to reconcile approval of an application at 65.05% (exisimg64.3%). It wm anw ^ proposed. They asked applicant to where exis^g hardcover * «> driv^along the east property line that extends into the consider a ^ to retein portions of the eastern driveway that also lakeshore yard. Applicant i» Corbin was asked to consider the removal provides access to a lower tuck under garage but he voiced major of portions of the driveway no ^ hardcover improvements on lot. He concern as he did not hardcover improvements on the pro^rty and that the noted he had not increased y ^ in 1986 The application involves a request pcopetty is ex^y hlld crealod n»jor erosion to insrall new ceuining ***** nioceed with the current improvement that is problems in the lakeshore yard. * hudset could not also cover the removal of ^ving to be quite cosily. ^ advue d lus cur rem ».ggf Commission asked if thU «-»»«i>™“ ^viding a natural buffer to three tiered walls at lakeshore. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings «k1 conditions of the Plmming Commission ’s reconunendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT » TO sjCTjw .m legally described as: Refer lo Exhibit A attached (hereinafter ‘the property-): and • k«€! anniied to the Citv fof a coiidUional use permit WHEREAS* the apph^t hw ap^w^ t ^ ^ hardcover variance to permit the reconstruction of retaining a 13.9% exists and a hardcovw is proposed. Minnesota: NOW. THEREFOI®. BE IT RESOtVED by the City Council of On.no. findings This application was reviewed as Zoning File <fl974. ^ • the. 1 R IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District The Otono Plan^ JUonstiuction A. The former of «*“ “ Page I of 6 B C. Per Section 10.56. Subdivision 16 (F) lakeshore property with severe topographies to the shoreline would be allowed m access stair. Applicant's conforming stair structure results in 620 additional square feet or 8.5% hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback area. Lakeshore improvements were installed by the previous owner in the late 70s and early 80s. Applicant has provi sediment into lake. * *erosion control to prevent fiirther erosion of 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property aK peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not inerely Qrve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial probity right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5 The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow tbe reconstruction of retaining walls within the lakeshore yard of this property wil not be detrimenul to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, wo^ not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to nmghtor^ properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that tte proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping wiA ^ iment and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono Oty grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code SectiOT f now reconstruction of retaining walls within the lakeshore to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit increases “ ^ following of retaining walls and an access stair within the lakeshore yard, subject to the ng conditions: Page 2 of 6 1 2. 3. 5. ipleted by July 15, 1995.• M • Applicant has agr^ oTcouiia^nppro^^^^^js; S£vr- designated on Page or 13.2% reduction setback. “*»*• fSisrs-”w “ - r.“of this resolution will expire on that date (October 24. )• Viol«ion of or «n^p.ian« wid. resolution shdl constinue . °L'^S.Stobler. mis<ten««»t.teiminale any audiority grained herein, and shall be punishable property. Adop«d by the Orono City Council on this 24Ui day of October. 1994. attest Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on 24A of October 1994^ ^wLd^. CaUahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City OeA of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instniment was exec behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of ^ 199 ___, before me a Notary Public acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of ^ 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally executed the foregoing instrument, andknown to me lo be the pei»n(s) de«nW m and wto e^trt tM t<^ ^ acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free Notary Public Page 4 of 6 • •• _tjag^DKffCRlPTIOB OF PREMISES SURVEYED t » • ♦ Lot lit TonK*vi«w Cardens, and that part of Lot 7«» Tpnkaviow Gardens des­ cribed as. follows: Beginning'at a point in the North line of said Lot 7which point is 61 feet Baeterly from the ilerth%iest corner of said lot; thence Southi/esterly in a straight line to a point on the shore of LaXe Minnetonka dis­ tant. 24 *59 feet Southeasterly mea­ sured along the shore of said lake from the South%iest corner of said Lot 78; thence Southeasterly along the shore of said lake 24.55 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said lot; said last nailed corner also being the moat Southerly corner of said Lot 78> tdienge Northeasterly along the Sootheastsrly line of said lot a distance of- Z40 feet to the moah Bastdrl'y corner of said lot: thenes Ncurthwesterly along the Morth- aasterly and Northerly lines of said lot a distance of 126.2 feet to the point of beginning. • t denotes iron msrksr set •t denotesIren marker found Bearings shewn era based upon sn‘ assuswd datum. Tliis survey > intehda to show the boundaries of the above described pcopdrty. .and location of an bnistinf'houser dockf gravel drive­ way, and sten# retaining walls tlieemom. it does .npt;porport to shbii any’, othsr 'iaipr^Mi^siMQts or i - Page 5 of 6 ^Hi '•» m CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TYLER CORBIN fiOTS 77. AMO 78. TONKAVIEW QARDENS ' HENNEFIN county . MINNESOTA t-.•' '•■i • ^ 1 % 1• !:- U< r 3 P'F.*.v ^hane mcsA ^ 19) ^ .V, ^1 »* «»• •• « Mi tM •4 xt- ssrj J?ssi Bray.: • C« fi. »•*■» »«■*' *—* aI Mii iMi %AM8i •• • * tMm 8^r« #1 U8i iA«« t«M li.Sf !••• tMtMmrlT ~- Ai.» M««A AlMf tfct tllAM •! ji4«% ftM M MOtMat c«tRav •! mI8 Zl * M Iff tAM«« iMUMMMflv alMf 11'. ’ h tott iii4 !••• •!•• Ylf timmm ■MilMMtaflfSSSi M MtlSMtaf IIM #1 . |S« iiataM* «t tAt taat •• %M 0 '*vV. MAtOTlv AAi nactiwflf um * M i iUtMi* •! I>8*> Y*A8 8« 9*8*8 8| ij :“«* r* m%— ita* Mtfetf tat fi Oaaaaaa Itaa Mtia# laani ¥0kf4‘ mitiMm 9hmm ata Oaaai a^ 't- ••asr-.rti.s'siir’”* © 0 mS ••fMk*. ^^MuaaaMaat 8 • Ml pavtaat ta t V > •• • *VA % /> V \/o'*, 8 J P V >} L W.r^l u4p OU jv^ 9/^ • ^ c3N tL^f • _ . L .r jtlK r ^/3 To: Date: Subject: Chaii Schrocder and Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator October 12, 1994 #1974 Tyler Corbin, 4680 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit/Vanance - Public Hearing District: LR-IB Requiring 1 Acre in Area following ordinances are pertinent for this review. 10.03. Subdivision 19 - Conditional use permit required for either construction or reconstniction of retaimng wall. <urt\nn 10 22 Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance required for installation of ^“J^^ining wau portions of which are located within lakeshore setback area. 1. 2. 0?13.9% (Applicam has not included exUting access Stairs that has deteriorated and been removed.) Pro^ = 2.090 s.f. ^20 f „ , 5% of the increase "‘■^uSrns:H«ronera. «cessUrs on lakeshom lot with steep banks.) 75-250’ setback area = 21,300 '"i'TrlyoS^ &g f-n addition of ponion of third reuining wall) List of Exhibits A - Application B - Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners’ List F - Gustafson Letter 10/11/94 F - Gustafson Letter 10/06/94 G - Hardcover Inventory, 0-75’ zone H - Hardcover Inventorv 75 250’ zone I - Original Plan J . Amended Plan-Kardcovcr Site Plan Zoning File #1974 October 12. 1994 Page 2 of after-the-fact conditfonal use permit and variance approv^ for restSSion of reuini^ walls within lalteshore yard, major portions of which ate looted within the 0-75' setback area. The former retaining walls and access stairs vm constructed o to rtS and deteriorated and retpiired replacement. On your si« ms,«fon y<m will note that erosion to been taking place during the period of tune that ^”v.n SSeS^. ^licam to provided silt fencing at the base of the bank to prevem further erosion into the take. Anniicant did not realize that permits were necessary to replace existing walls a^ proceedtd*^o install boulder walls in place of timber retainmg wall. ^ * «i nian The lower level wall that has already been installed is approximately 3 in height,original plan. TheI<^ lewl} 4' and the wall S ReTto ExhibU F, Gustafson's first review He advised that if the wafts were to exceed 4' in height that engineering p^ of the ,11 concerns noted in his report. He also recommended v^l that L to^ceed 4' in height not only retpi^ hS sZuM be constructed of moduUr masonry block rather than bouldeis. The ap^icam wm o^S <o ai~"<l l>» plan- aPP'^^*"' of “!• by itoUlS^ a ttad wall. There was to be at least a 4' separation between each tier. Review Exhibits J and E. OusUfson to approved the amended plan stowmg three tierrf 11. nnt In exceed 4' in heigta This can be completed with the boulders as ongmally p^^. Lake access suirs h/ve also been designated on the amended pUn and appear to meet the 4’ width standards required. Anv condition of approval must include the requiremem that er^ion oomfol plan prior to application being scheduled before the Council. OPt*on^pp^^jjl of amended plan per Gustafson’s recommendation; OR ^ . Approval as amended by the Planning Commission. ■ \ cmr OF ORONO - general land iM applk SIhio aJ. Saoek' t>P-.___ S-BS33 oi3H C mlb>x^ Address Phone (home) _ Phone (work) - 0^^ h .f / <^iL£ P/^. City ftrtiOtxAJrt Zip<rfT.5(?V-7^^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name -------- Phone (home) Phone (work) Address City frKo Sso^ Ibe adjacJt*p^elsof land. fees - with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use ^ S200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ' $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use ■--------filling - designated wcdand or floodplam ------- Gradine and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakcshore "PRD/PID • see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original ^plica i ~ After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER ^200^™inmercial Site Plan Review (+ consu’tani fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation .................. $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ^ $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ~ $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District_____ Other (specify). (month/year) r r'J V' ' .r ra^Ar:CE OFFICE 13502O000Q rt* f>'v ■*vV“i ChECK Ti RECEIpy'itim YOU 43145S0 LOOi Ti> 09/: required submittals Completed Application Foim. Describe request in detail. r<0HQ ^FICE m,. 200, m YOU .•ioi rc 09/7. CertiHed Pr^rty Owners List of owners within 350’ O^ou can obtain this Ust from — Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center. 348-3271). 4 >r Plat Map. — Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. 6 ' X Attach legal description to application if not Eluded on required survey. .y* Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 8 V List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 9 Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). jQ -------As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons * you wish notified of this application. TOR X n? SUBMITTED. (Staff wUl require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) Hie Applicant and Propeity Owner must sign diis applicalion. Pl^ teinember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been mcluded. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff___________ —----------Date---------- “ APPLICANT’S SIGNA' The applicant hereby agrees W^pro^ Administrator, agrees to pay a< and/or unusual expens^J] supplied is true and ’^or^t to Applicant ’s sj^ture ronnati (staff tim< Iviewfcf this applibdtion. tion^^^irra imelpot cov^i or requested by the Zoning Ited by original fee payment) certifies that the infonnatior^ »f His/her knofrl^ge. / * Date OWNER’S KIGNA The owner hereby aclpaoi^edge entry onto the p members for poises of i ?ee$^|6 this a/pUcauon.and fiirther authorized reasonable [o^mtants.^gents, commission members, and Council verifimtion of ^^q^^quest. Owner’s signature 25 days before l^Planwui C»in*mmissioo Meedna. Planniai AppUcant maiihwt aU nibimn41s inAftfe cqy^ce* a «»y« be oieseoittall acheduled CoimmsdotrMb^gs are bepon chtWMo^ of enable lo aiiewl a scheduled meeting, of this change prior to the meeting. K>ns rour Ding lent) ition able incU DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT rr°Tr^i prqposep iMfBPVi:MeNTS. THE PROPERTY HAD 2 TIMBER RETAINING WALLS AND STEPS LEADING SOmWVEST CORNER OF THE DECK TO THE DOCK AT THE LAKE THE i*.P ANnCTra>S WERE CONSTRUCTED OUT OF ASPEN AND SUBSEQUENTLY ground the TIMBERS LINING DRIVEWAYS in place THE TIMBERS LINING THE DW\^ HAVE ROTTED AND WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEW PRESSURE TREATED PI^ THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE SIMPLY REPLACING THE PREVIOUS WALLS AMn STEPS WITH NEW MATERIALS. THE ONLY ADDITION WILL BE AN ^ITIOn A WALL TO MEET THE CITY S REQUIREMENT THAT TIffi WTEXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT. WITHOUT ENGINEERWG AND I^O engineering AVAILABLE FOR BOULDER RETAINING WALLS. PROPOSED improvements ^ ru THE LAKE REPLACE EXISTING ROTTED TIMBERS LINING DRIVEWAYS 31 AND #2 WITH NEW 0 60 PRESSURE TREATED PINE 1. RETAINING WALLS. A. RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BOULDERS ARE APPROXIMATELY 2.5 FEET LONG X 2.5 FEET WIDE X 2 FEET DEEP. EACH WALL IS APPROXIMATELY 4 FEET HIGH. B THE BOULDERS ARE LARGER ON THE INITIAL ROW AND A^ SET BACK EACH SUBSEQUENT ROW TO INSURE STABILITY- "TO BOULDERS ARE CHOSEN IN SUCH A FASHION AS TO INSUl^ ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRITY IN OTHER WORDS C^Ti^ BOULDERS WILL FIT BETTER TOGETHER THAN OTHER BOULDERS EACH ROW FOLLOWING THE INITIAL ROW IS SET BACK APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES FROM THE PRECEDING ROW. C RETAINING WALLS “A” AND “B” ARE IN ALMOST TTOE>^ LOCATION AS THE PREVIOUS RETAINING WALLS. RETAINING WALL “C” IS IN BETWEEN WALLS “A” AND “B” AND IS BED^ CONSTRUCTED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS LEVEL SPACE IN BETWEEN EACH WALL WILL BE AT LEAST 4 FEET. ytTFPS FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PECK TO THE LAKE, A STEPS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PINE THAT HAS BEEN 0.60 CCA PRESSURE TREATED. THE STEPS WILL BE 42 INCHES WIDE X 36 INCHES LONG X 6 INCHES HIGH BETWEEN EACH STEP WHICH IS approximately 36 INCHES, WILL BE 1.5 INCH RIVER ROCK WHICH WILL BE UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC. THE STEPS WILL FOLLOW THE EXISTING GRADE AND RETAINING WALL “B ”. UNTIL THEY ARE ANGLED IN THE SAME DIRECTION AS THE DOCK THE STEPS WILL NOT BE BURIED MORE THAN 5 INCHES BENEATH THE SURFACE OF THE GRADE THE STEPS WILL BE LOCATED IN THE SAME POSITION AS THE PREVIOUS STEPS PRIOR TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS the steps are MARKED ON THE SURVEY WITH THE LETTER “C”. B EACH STEP WILL DROP APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES FROM THE PREVIOUS STEP UNTIL THE STEPS LEVEL OUT NEAR THE LAKE IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE STEPS ARE REPLACING IN LOCATION AND SIZE THE PREVIOUS STEPS WHICH HAD ROTTED OUT. 3. TIMBERS I.INING DRIVEWAYS #1 AND #2, A. DRIVEWAYS #1 AND #2 ARE CURRENTLY LINED WITH 8 FT, 6X6 ASPEN TIMBERS. THESE WILL BE REPLACED IN THE EXACT LOCA1TON AS THE EXISTING TIMBERS WITH 0.60 PRESSURE TREATED PINE. THE TIMBERS WILL FOLLOW THE GRADE OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY. SINCE THESE STILL EXIST THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE TO THE HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS. A SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO INSURE MINIMAL RUN OFF INTO THE LAKE. THIS SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY 10-14-94. |brf • 1 ■ijUi'i 'i yi I/II Bonestroo MM Rosene AnderiikA ^1 Associates Engineers & Architects October lit 1994 OoD G ftonefliDO l^jdtf^ W iDicne. PI * jotegft C Arxie**!. pi MarvtftL SorviO.PI PcrvuO £ Turner PI Gvnn K Cook. PI ThomM I pi ROOert G Schurvcht PE Sus^ M loertvi. C PA •Senior ComuUnf Mh A GoiQortt PI Mcnff PSHfcrte. PI ffduid w Po«er PI 0«MdO toiftoo. Pf %)ben C itiisfftL AiA Jerry A loudorv PI M»rt A HMnon. PI MchMt T teuohinrv PI ibO I EM TrwrriM I Anderiort AIA OorM C PE Thom« A Sj^kQ Pf Fiedmc i Scenootg. PE lynjei Mirtne/. PE Mchjei P liu. PE AgnnM ftng^AlCP Tiwmii W McnoA PI Mchicr C LyncA PE Jimn t MMndL PE Jerry D ^<iacA. PE Scoa J Aigjnek. PI icrwiftfiP AndfnoA PI Mjrt i Ml pi Mirk A Seo PI Giry W Monen. PI Pity j Gannon. AIA OiTWi J Eogenon. PI A KckSchmA PI Ph*p J CiMsei. PI Mimo Vt/WA PI M<m • Jenjen. Pf L P9i«pGnvii PI KMAL MACVfWrL PI G»yO MiM.Pl P MOP osk PE Keoti MPI pnu^i Benoi. PI ShJwnO GuMkoni PP CecAO OM. PE PAi G Hnier. PE j^PCMvr PI CAMlA IncklOA teoM PMAky HirtifsM Jifr«lF IngeO\i« Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Corbin Residence File No. 139-1974 Dear Jeanne, maximum height of 4 feet and a minimum spacing of 4 feet between the tiers. TTm change will move the top wall further north. The proposed three-tier wall as sho^ on the survey and described in the narrative is acceptable from an engineenng standpoint. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St, Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636^. » * hardcovt SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ulation worksheet 75-250*25-500 ’500-1000 ’ HARDCOm^-^Q^ A. House _ Length Width X X B. Garage C. Driveway __%0 X X I'L D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck lo X X X.6 F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total proper ^ area in zone ^ ^ 2~SO X 100 A fO ---- -------------- Ppnpn^FD hardcover IN ZO?^ •frr Leogth lo Width t. lO qo B. Garage C. Driveway \' D, Sidewalk X X E. Paiio/Dcck 20 X X 2.6 66 Underlain By Plastic tiQ .. X X X izfz G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ A lo^O ^ ® 5---- 50 7^3 I4<3 1*4-0 ^(oQ 60 3Sa S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 220 S.F. ~ S.F. S.F. S.F. S F. S.F. A B A B SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ^YfinWc wAgncovER in zone A. House__________—. hardcover calculation worksheet 0-75’ ^5~2S^ 25-500’500-11 m X X X Wid± B. Garage C. Driveway Pi Bi Paiie/Dee^ OexJ(^ Lnwb—pe By PlesBC -j«p- %o m X X X X X X X X X 10 ’-X---------- 12- 3o G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in ZONE proposeh hardcover !N zone -r B V13oO £ue/i^v^ B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk Length Width X X X E. Patio/Deck _________ X X X X X X X X X G. Other £ TOTAL HARDCOVER LN ZONE TOTAL property AREA IN ZONE A - B X 100 = X 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^8+,^ S.F. l<^2o i^OC> S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2/lnC> S.F. S.F. ^30 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. “ ’s.F. L'f#.f^Si k. s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B A B . /f : > V-/; - Vi" H . -'ti ■ -1 ■. 5l;; | ■ -■ ■;.* •^^?l . 'I ■, *»_ ^ -I. • 1,4*' v« •v ■A ./ Lfihil 't-. l’"V' ^■ij! 'fit .. . :'■ }la t\ ■ ..? ^m Chillim ;iil:=«a li{"iS ■*l/; '■ % ■ '■.'ft .♦ • -it i»fi ^•w FROr. : fiCT CBMMUNICfiTIQN TECH COKP.phone no. : 6129310488 K ^ 1^1 s Advanced Communication Technologies on Tbffuffoys'i W<M ...TWiy^ 10/19/94 Jean Mabusth Ci^ of Orono P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Dear Jean: Thanks for all your help relative to obtaining a variance to re-install the reta-iing walls which had fallen. It would be gready appreciated if you ^ ““ councU meeting for approval. I believe that date is October 24.1994. This would allow me to immediattly resume the project which wiU minimiie further eitMiflirO^ soil into the lake. ^ '^ttnh fnr/Cour heio In this matter. Sincerely. 80 much fop'your help in ^ iHX^orbin \ v.r 1-^ <: h"->i . i. ^ .* ; ' >'M «■ Mil .... ...:« M........ s=,4, .Pho« <«2. V31^W. p« «1« 41'."'“ I n lots 77. AND 78, TONKAVIEW GARDENS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 'M. V • ' -^^*^** PESCSIfTION OP PKEMISgS SUWVEYEOi ^4'* i» - • 4* ^ UoF 77♦ tonkavl«%# G*rd#ii«« and that part Qf Lot 7i, ToakaviM Cardans d«a cribod at followti Bo9ifinin9 at a Boint In th9 North lino of aaid IjOt 7I« ohich point la Li foot lattorly froo tho Northwoat cornar Of laid lotf thonoo Southwoatorly fjj ^ Jtraloht lino to a point on th# oKoro of Uko Ninnotonka dia- foot Southoaatorly ooa- ourod alono tho ahoro of aaid lako tho foythwoat cornor of aaid tot 7ti thonco Southoaatorly alono tho ahoro of aaid lako 2i.55 foot to tho Southoaatorly oornor of aaid loti aaid loot naoad cornor alao "}5«.tho Boat Southorly cornoi of said Lot 7Si thancro Northoaatarly alono tho Southoaatorly lino of aaid lot a diatanco of 240 foot to tho ■fSt taatarly cornor of aaid loti thonoo Northuoatorly alono tho North-oaatoriw _>terth*r»y linas of said ; V • 4Uu«oa of U«.2 foot to tb« V ^tnt of bM^nnlno. fI donotaa iron oarkor aot Pi donotaa iron aiarkor found Soarinoa ahoun aro haaod upon an paauBod datuo. .v^lt 8urv«y IntcAda ta ahow tha ^ MUAdArlaa of tha abova daacribad o location of an w«»»aain9 nouaa« dack, fravol drivo- ‘^y# and atona ratainino valla •thoraon# it data not purport to • ahou any othor ioprovahonta or •opcrooohBanti.m ^ •Sr-',.- ■tVOKIN lun ntvcwi'iHiN _ COF HN CRONBFRG, I\C. h. lip) To- Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmcmbers ^ <i'y Ron Moorse. City Adminislracor ^ V Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator ^ x/ October 20, 1994 #1978 Westonka Intervention Project. 2380 Shadywood Road - Conceptual Review/Applicant Requests Zoning Amendment Zoning District: LR-IC Brief Review of Application The Planning Commission completed a coj^eptual locate a residential shelter county Roads 15 and 19. The current Church building located in Navarre at the equipped to maintain up residential and commercial codes do not floor olan submiued for the review (Exhibits to 20 residents. Per the conceptual site showm Review Exhibits S and T. K and U. no expansions of the ^ j r_ic, 1/2 Acre Lakeshore Single The property is surrounded to the north Business Family Residential Zoning District and to - «imo9:t 6 vears Over the past six years. District. The Church structure school, health club, antique Staff has been asked to consider proposa ^alereen Drue None of the requests were ever ».»»■ »■ vandalism. I,.™- p*.»r volunteers that live in the local ^ommum y _ Applicant advised at the recent Planning Spring Park, Mound, Minnetonka Beach and . their service Commission meeting that if they receive the g serving the entire Lake area will now extend to the shoreline communi les ^^^unity). Westonka Intervention ^coX." “rr9“ :rs i-r- —- ^pr^alS; fo^ms CrtfdimXwShc' cirono Pc.tce serving both Orono and our contract cities. Staff reviewed with the Plannittg facilities w.thin the cities of Plymouth and Mmnetor^a, fhe Wy ^ Free Shelter, is located on the north shore of facilities located on a fonner church shelter's part of a larger complex of ot residential zone. The Plymouth zoning staff owned men’s camp located within a ^ jq allow this facility as it specified the advised that the code amendment was allowed under the single family use had to be in existence as of November 20. 1989. l nc residential zoning district with a conditional use permit. vd N mv vv viiikf m 4ir«ct wpif• ii>J U^Syrvfyur tiwirf KMM , 11 1 IMII 1 fH-ff 1 > nktflim H»MO 11 1 • \\ Zoning File #1978 October 20, 1994 Page 2 The sojourner facmty >oc-d in %tff T'‘‘'T.haf auhe time tta proposal was being reviewed by the City, the neighborhood was in advised that a the t P P opposition except for som- SgTS:" In a"cem cu. de-sac area. Minnetonha ccxle -tm. provide s^, era. L^afds that may be consideted for inclusion wtth an amendment of the code. . c .Ua. oirea.rh nian review at the Planning Commissi''., was to not only r ^ze bmh staff and Planning Commission members with both ,.ie specific and general familiarize both statt ana narm g recommend wheth^. and how the code should be aspects of a domestic abuse ^*^>1 i^te ho-- , did not fully address the land use =; s s .35=^- p'“/%irarSeM Distr^!^would allow similar uses with a CUP such as nursing homes, and Professional Business Dist , ^ areas hospitals, rest " that temains residemial with a facilityin Navarre with B-l ..ung, Tte problem ^ J of this size is --.t once ^ „ff„ed for sale under residential zoning. The u-id -^vir—5 property must he immediately adjacent to a commercial district, etc. council may wish rrit ru.rbe:S*:^,T1^ .^o review the staff memo of October .3, 1994 for more detail on this review. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Options of Action A. To refer the application back to the Planning Commission for further review of the land use issues. B. TO direct staff to schedule a Joint meeting with " Council 10 review applicant’s request to amend the zoning code. Isv To; From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator October 13. 1994 #1978 Westonka Intervention Project. 2380 Shadywood Road - Sketch Plan Zoning District: LR-IC staff to proceed with a zoning amendment. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Addendum C - Description of Operation D - Proposal E - Mission Statement F - Construction Statement „ . ^ . G - Application - Minnesota Nonprofit Assistance Fund H ■ Application - Minnesoia Housing Finance Agency r - Memo. Craig Anderson. Chief of Police S'^^ornfac us & M.nnetrista J - Kurt Erickson. Orono Police Department. Memo 10/10/94 K - Site Plan L - Floor Plan . , _ .... ^ Persons O - Mound Code Section and Proposed Amendment P - John G. Fischer Letter 9/28/94 O Sojourner Letter 9/15/94 R - Sandy Schute. St. John's WELCA. 2 Utters S - Location Map T - Zoning Boundary Map Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.25 - LR-IC zoning district. Zoning File #1978 October 13, 1994 Page 2 Review of Applies^*®** Westonka Imervenlion Project is a community based non-profitWestonKO inier ci ^ Westonka serves approximately 1/4 of the Lake volunteers that ive «/estonka Intervention Project, Inc. was started under the guidance and rrrof ““iergy. ^s«ia, service workers and seboo. distnet leaders and has been in existence for approximately 10 years. n • rtvhihiu K and S Westonka proposes to convert the existing Grace Baptist »Si.. .K victims of dontestic abu. ja.d L^ fiom^lT. reveal only 6 as';igt«d victims including ^ g^nt applications it shows a potential of 9 sleeping rooms on the '“wer . number of residents. The average stay for sleeping rooms. APP''“"'^ ^n^ner will also provide a meeting place for family and a victim at the she ter is H days. 5„sjo„s We^are advised that there are 14 trainedindividual counseling and group therapy sessions, we arc au volunteers but it is not clear how large the administrative slaff will be. Review Exhibits S and T. The property is surrounded to the east and north by single family residential use and to the south and west by commercial uses. Staff is aware of mo S“n thl'S^stom of"!^^^ service facilities located on a former religious „(..;nns that allow residence facilities under .one. Review Exhibit M. the Plymouth ~ a„«„ied for S“ a « a — =«. 1989. The Minnetonka facility known as Sojourner -s ^ethUrho'l^'tt up to 16 residents. It is ^as in strong opposition to the facility. the proposal was being ^ tn^have\lended in with the surrounding single family Now there is no opposition and it seems to Exhibit M. Minnetonka developed If"e orono code is lo be amended, any one of these could be considered for inclusion for a conditional use permit. The westonka Interveniion Proj^t had ^P;X:^rt^“^rmort “ Commission and Council in the spring ot • y residential zoning distnet. In commercial area in downtown Mound adjacent to g similar reports from discussions with the Mound staff, they advised that they loo Zoning File October 13, 1994 Page 3 nmfessionals involved in domestic violence and police reports from the various cities noting few moblems if anv The application moved from the Planmng Commtssion to *e Council. It wa rc^^il when residems from the adjacent neighborhoods voiced loud and strong tn the nronosed use bringing forth documentation that completely contradicted report of th to the proposed use S S Please review Exhibit J, Kurt Erickson s report contributing muni p Leractions with the facilities at Plymouth and Minnetonka, commenting on P concerns such as the Minnetonka facility which has traffic Erickson’s report al o notes j„,idents with the operation of the ?a“i.hin^ communities. The majority of the calls involved vehicle lockouts, suspicious activity and medicals. annlication has been accepted as a sketch plan so that both staff and Planmng iH hprnme familiar with a domestic abuse facility in a calm, informative Commission coul facility in both the inunediate community Please consider the following criteria; 1. General location ■ hub of Lake Mirmetonka. Location within West Hennepin service district. 2. Lc-al/neighborhood immediately adjacent to commercial district and bus service. 3 Contiguous to an established neighborhood with smaller developed lots. a Size of orooertv - adequate distance from facility to adjacent single family SfderlerTther^ 1 adequate buffer aone to shield adjacent res.dent.al neighborhood? 5. Will .he facility impact local infrastructure ■ greater demands on sewer, water, streets, police, etc. 6. Potential for diminution in surrounding property values. 7. Would the use be compatible in all single family residential zones' Should the amendment in-clude a rezoning to commercial? 8. Would .he proposed use located in *'>' CMP? Review public service plan of CMP, spec y Services. Health Care Services. 9. Other criteria suggested by Planning Commission. Zoning File /^1978 October 13, 1994 Page 4 Questions related to specific use. 1 Toul number of staff - include volunteers and paid staff? 2. How many clients attend group counseling sessions? How often are these conducted a week? 3. What kind of a facility do they currently have in the City of Mound? 4. What facilities do they currently refer victims to? 5. Are there residence facilities of 6 or less within the West Hennepin district? A The final directive to Westonka Intervention at the Mound review was to seek a in rmore rural areas of the service district away from older, htgher density residential .Kighborhoods. What is applicant’s response? Staff Plans to take photographs of the residential facilities and surrounding neightorhr^s in both^^m^ and Plymouth'^ Photographs will be presented at your meet.ng on the 17th. i. 'V.. I cr^ OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPCf^TION i fi • S Site Auuiwi* ^ - -.. . (/ / Type of Application to be Property Identificauon Number (P I--------------------------- Addrcss_/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name__ Address Phone (home) ^ 7 7 ^ 7 ‘ ^ Phone (work) ---- f^iw Zip ^ __City Phone (home)___ Phone (worK^__ Zip. ' “JIS rS ««, CUP ««■■!•" etc.) S 50.0U l*or cauii ------------ S125.00 Residential Accessory use S200.(X) Institutional (church, school, ” $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments " $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg S250 00 Coinmercial/Indusinal use - “““'“oX- TO • -W--”1”= S5.tS?„r4-.:£«- 0— : AftM-the-Fact Fee - Double Current AppUcat.on Fee -TT*v' .*r ''C-*'*''*}il !> t.ny.re_ - • • i .A • * »"* “ * t, fc- ■ f ‘*h wf iJwv..vvv.vv._^, -.-.A ,V: Vi >£u ^ LiitCS alu-.'.vv . 'yv- ii^OJ Ac.*/ * • / «rcla. Site Plan Review (. consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation . $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Sub --------$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendmen $100.00 Appeals -^Ot^r seXschedult -OC-OC present USE OF PROPEKFY Pr^cp-nt Zonine District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify). r 2.U« of owners within 350-(you cMObt^ to ^^^^Det-mnenr of Finance. A-603. Government Center. 348-3271). of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey infonnatioa. - - involve 8 10. sE“S=S*.=s.cs£=2^=.r lLT.“^arate list of any odter persons you wish notified of this application.------you wish nouncu oi uus ,o« «r ««>»“’»,fH-’” 'srssiiis“rs‘'irsi5isg submitted.)suDnuiicu.7 Certification by Clerical Department that Umd Use AppUcan^ is complem. Ipttials of Clerical Staff., ' APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE information required or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agtees » P™v^ fcL^™ime not coveted by original fee pa^m) Administrator, agtees 'o,P*>'^!“°“l/„ application, and certifies that the infom».uon and/or unusual expenses incurred ut itnowledee. / / supplied is true and con«txo.the_^^^»^ - / / Applicant’s signature / OWNER’S SIGNATURE and further authorized reasonabfe ciLiteioe Mee^p « beW ?*!^*^cil«iKa. ItmappUeani»OfBc ahia nfflOf tO tll6 XDCCtUlK* Pate ^ of »h«« change prior lo ihe meeting. r <Westonka ^^ntciu/ention 'T'/ioject September 20, 1994 Planning Commission City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Members sr4r^ i .t7T I ’v?s,s»' Weaonka Intemmion Projea. Inc has been in existence for over ten years We have served the needs of those victims of domestic violeiice as best we can with the limited resources we have During the emire time of our organization and the hundreds of victims served the one thing we have not been able to accomplish, yet we believ e to be the most important part of the rebuilding process, is to be able to safiely house those victims and their children in a shelter With the availability of a shelter we can hopefully break that cycle of violence and stall the healing process and help them rebuild and once again become productiv e members of our community AS you are aware we did have an opportunity for a shelter in Mound We had been given the conv ent from Our Lady of the Uke Catholic Church and warned to move that structure to the comer of Three Points Blvd and Co Rd 110 Pot a variety of reasons that project did fail We now haw opportunity for a sheher in your city and feel that ifs location would not only serve the victims and their children better but its ceraral location is ideal for a number of reasons The location 1 am talking about is the Grace Baptist Church at 23SO Shadywood Road right on the comer of County Roads 15 and 19, the very hub and heart of the Lake Minnetonka Community 472 2141 • no BOX 34 • 1400N0. MINNESOTA 55364 QAicsionfca ^ntcwe«tfe« '^>/io|cct We do have a purc'.jise agreement with the church which is of course contingent upon the City of Orono’s approval of the site with any necessary zoning changes that may be required for it’s operation and also on obtaining the necessary financing for it’s ongoing operation. For your information we have a complete budget approved with the Minnesota Department of Corrections and Human Services that will not only provide it s daily operations but will provide all the necessary moneys to maintain ifs long term financial needs We also have applications submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for a Loan/Grant program for shelters for domestic abuse and to Minnesota Non-Profit Assistance Fund for a loan to help in the purchase and rehabilitation of the church John Fischer of Professional Fund Raisers, Inc is also assisting us in Tying to obtain a Grant from the McKnight Foundation Included in the packet of information first of all our proposal, letters of support from the various shelters, agencies, and police departments that work with us in the field of domestic abuse A Description and Mission Statement of Westonka Intervention Project, our 501 C Tax Exempt Status, the approval for our budget from the Minnesota Department of Corrections, a copy of the proposal from BTK Inc and sworn construction statement as to what may be necessary to rehabilitate the structure, copies of the two applications already submitted for additional financial assistance and a letter from Mr John Fischer I do hope this information will be helpful in the process of making everyone a^vare of the desperate need for a shelter in our community As in other communities around the State of Minnesota, the endorsement of this facility will ultimately be a tremendous asset to the City of 472-2141 • POBOX34 • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 r QA/cstonfca >^tewe«tio« ‘^noieci .1 .* I -rr 17 M '4^ September 20. 1994 Planning Commission City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Members Westonka Intervention Project, Inc. has been in existence for over ten years. We have served the needs of those victims of domestic violence as best we can with the limited resources we have During the entire time of our organization and the hundreds of victims served the one thing we have not been able to accomplish, yet we believe to be the most important part of the rebuilding process, is to be able to safely house those victims and their children in a shelter With the availability of a shelter we can hopefully break that cycle of violence and start the healing process and help them rebuild and once again become productive members of our community. As you are aware we did have an opportunity for a shelter in Mound We had been given the convent from Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church and wanted to move that structure to the comer of Three Points Blvd and Co Rd 110 For a variety of reasons that project did fail We now have an opportunity for a shelter in your city and feel that it’s location would not only serve the victims and their children better but its central location is ideal for a number of reasons. The location I am talking about is the Grace Baptist Church at 2380 Shadywood Road right on the comer of Countv Roads 15 and 19, the very hub and heart of the Lake Minnetonka Community 472 2141 • PO 00X34 • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 QA/csto«fca i^tcwcntton ^/loject Orono because it tmly wli serve her citizens as wdl as those in her neighboring cities Thank you for the opportunity of being able to present this proposal Sincerely yours. Valerie J. Hessburg, Executive Director 472-2141 • PO 80X34 • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 QAiestonfea ^9nt6/tt/ention ^/tojcci .. i i.' a, vt -■ DESCRIPTION Westonka Intervention Project is a community based nonprofit organization of volunteers committed to the reduction of family violence Westonka Intervention has fourteen (14) trained volunteers that live in the Westonka Community These volunteers have helped some four-hundred-sixty (460) victims of domestic violence during the past five (5) years These carefully selected volunteers are given extensive training to handle domestic abuse situations The volunteers work as crisis advocates on call for crisis intervention in domestic violence cases. They offer referral and suppon services to victims and will accompany them during legal procedures Westonka Intervention Project also offers community outreach and education programs Five (5) community forums and thirty (30) speaking engagements have been conducted by our agency Westonka Intervention Project presently serves some portions of the Western Hennepin County Area, approximately one-fourth of the Lake Minnetonka Community. The police departments of these cities and social service ageiKies work closely together depending on one another for support and assistance Westonka Intervention Project is a unique program because it was started from a need expressed by the community Domestic violence was a prevalent problem not being addressed or assisted by any one agency Police, clergy, social service workers, school district members of the community were all being asked to address this issue. Together they started Westonka Interv ention Project, Inc According to Len Harrell. Chief of Police for Mound, Minnesota, police call-backs for domestic violence situations have been 472-2141 • POBOX34 • MCXIND. MINNESOTA 55364 QA/cstonfea <^ntew/ention ^noiect reduced by forty (40) percent in his city elone This produced »n ovcnchelming support from the Other cities Westonki Intervention Project ser\cs At this time, Westonk* Imervention Project only serves approximately twenty-five (25) percem of the total lake community With the opening of a shelter and assistance from the Minnesota Depanmem of Corrections and the Departtnem of Human Services we will now be able to assist all those victims of domestic abuse who choose to take mivantage of our service 472-2141 • P 0 00X34 • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 PROPOSAL ^ Westofika Intervention Project, Inc hereby proposes to convert the existing Grace Baptist Church located in Navarre on the comer of County Roads 19 and 15 to a shelter for victims of domestic abuse The shelter would house up to twenty (20) victims of domestic abuse including their family members. In over ten (10) years of operation and hundreds of victims served, we have never been tUe to provide safe hooeing in any of the existing sheltefs due to the fact that they are always full I In fact they have on the average approximately a sixty (60) percent tura-away due to the desperate need for such facilities Based on our experience at Westonka Intervention, there is a critical need for additional shelter space to meet the needs of battered women and their children At present we serve approximatdy twenty-five (25) percent of the total Lake Minnetonka Community but with the addition of a professionally staffed shelter we can serve the entire area. The average stay in a shelter for the victims and their families is seventeen (17) days. With this in mind we will be able to house four-hundred and twenty-nine (429) victims a year This would be a significant number It will help break the cycle ofviolence in our community and start the process of healing and enable them to once again become productive members of our community As a part of our proposal we will illustrate through graphs and a slide presentation not only the need for such a facility but how it can be a tnie asset to the community Many victims do not obtain Orders for Protection and remain in abusive relationships because they have no place to 472*2141 • PO BOX 34 • MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 CUicstonfca ^ntcAicntion ^A0|ect I > I fkt material coatalaed i» the ©vertmad material and slide presentation are as follows: The need for domestic abuses shelters, local, state and national Domestics and domestic assault police call totals from Wayzata, Mound, Minnetrista, Orono, Deephaven, and South Shore Police Departments. Excerpts from Minnetonka Planning Commission and Minnetonka City Council meetings regarding their shelter (safety, property values, etc ) Statements from differem shelters around the Twin City area Slides showing the interior and exterior of shelters around the Twin City Area In coadnsioii, shelters are a way to break the cycle of violence. They are created to support no.Hvlole.t behavior ami provide a temporary, safe police for children a.d women who are in desperate situations. Providing a shelter b a statement to the community saying we will not tolerate violence in our community. We will support non-violence. 472-2141 • P 0 00X34 • mound. MINNESOTA 55364 CUicstonfca IL . r A r-^ • ^.MnnuJn^^ l>r<^ committed to reduce the incidents of Westonka Intervention is a coroimmity haseo prqiec domestic violence through intervemion TO imervene in domesic abuse situations offering options and support to the victims provide victims with information on their rights and options I I to ;omp«ny victims during legal proccduib toacci c to provide transportation to appropriate services d to provide safe surroundings for victims and their families TO assist social services Uw enforcemmtt agencies in domestic viol««e situations victims involved in a to provide twenty-four (24) hour response services to domestic abuse situations b ,0 refer victims »id offenders of domestic violmKC to the appropriate social service agencies C ,0 foster relationsitips with other like organizaiioits d to provide advocates who will personally meet wHh victims after an arrest has been made for domestic viol«KC and offer ongoing support . ,0 keep confidential and accurate records of all domestic abuse cases To heighten community awareness of domestic violenc a ,0 promote public speaking engagements on domestic violence b to provide literature, flyers and posters on domestic violence C to develop and oiler an updated list of resoumes to victims and citir«» d ,0 offer workshops, inservice training and forums on domestic abuse network with other community based soctal service organe to 4722141 • POBOX34 • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 ITEM SI JBCONTRACTOR/SUPPLIER 1.Survey BTK S 500 2.Permit BTK $1,500 3 General Conditions BTK $1,500 4 Insurance BTK S 500 5.Architect/Eng.BTK s 6,000 6 Grounds By Seller $ (N I C.) 7.Paving Master Asphalt (allow)$ 8 Concrete BTK s 2,400 9 Lumber Shaw Lumber $2,500 10.Demolition BTK $5,300 11.Waste Removal BTK s 2.000 12.Drywall BTK/Shaw Lumber/Tamarack $13,600 13 Insulation Tamarack $ 14 Millwork Shaw Lumber $2,750 15 Doors and Windows Shaw Lumber s 16.Hardware Shaw Lumber Big Bob s 1,900 17.Carpentry BTK Tamarack s 2,500 18.Glass By Seller $(N.I.C.) 19.Exterior Painting Wendgey/BTK s 3,200 20.Interior Painting Wendgey/BTK $6,500 21.Caulks and Sealants Trenco/BTK $1,500 22.Roofing Repair Western Roo6ng/BTK s 700 23.Ceramic Tile BTK (allow)$3,400 24.• Vinyl/Carpet BTK (allow)s 12,150 25.Acoustic Tile BTK/Tamarack (allow)s 26.Utilities NSP Owner $ (N.I.C.) 27.Plumbing Chuck Lee Plumbing (allow)$7,950 28.HVAC Total Mechanical LBP, Inc.(allow)$6,200 29. Electrical Vector Electric (allow)s 5,500 30 Electrical Fixtures Vector Electric (allow)s 2,000 r k 31. Emergency Lighting 32. Security System 33. Fire Suppression 34. Kitchen Equipment 35. Supervision 36. Omheid 37. Builder's Fee 3S Contingency Fee Vector Electric Vector Electric Ansul/others BTK/others BTK BTK BTK 18% of $132,700 BTK 5% of $156.586 (allow) (allow) UUfiw) GRAND TOTAL OF ALL COSTS. FEES. AND ALLOWANCES; $ 1,400 $ 3,000 $ 450 $ 11,500 $ 4,000 $ 3,000 $ 23,886 $ 7.829 $164^ ■a Minnesota Nonprofits Assistance Fund2700 UluvcfSlty A>-e«oe West Suite 45 St Paul. Mimejota 55114 (61216474)013 A Program of The Minneapolis Foundation ■ ■'x ■ Loan applicaiion DATE:September 7> 1994 ORGANIZAnON NANiE. FEDERAL Tax Identification number ADDRESS: 3490 Lvthrum Wav. P.Q J 41 1515776 Rn< 34. ^'nl|n^l. —5536.4, CTTY/ZIP CODE: --------------------------------------------------------------------- u.lurte Hetsburt/ten Hessburq Y ears OF SERVICE 9 yfors and i-JiMra -rm-g-x-Mtiu. n(ructor/ca/D1ractor phone Numofr - 666-62 98 -------------- Background inforrution : B. Descnption of Clients Serv ed: Victims of domestic violence and abuse. C ’Date of Incorporation tch 27, 19^ D State of Incorporation In: Minnesota CimilCNT NEED: A. [>fTrpM the fnirpose for >\^ch the loan is being requested and the use of the funds. The purpose of the loan is to aid us in the purchase and the rehabilitaion of the propcny being purchased. Its ithinctimthem. B. Haw other alternatives been explored to resolve your financing need? Descnbe. We have made application to the McKnight Foundation as well as the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Vie have also been approved by the Minnesota Department of Corrections and Human Services for an annual budget of no less than 5352,395.00 which is based on a LOAN REQUEST: /•7d.oo<^^_________ Movembe r 1, 1994 A. Amount requested: ___ B. When do you need the loan: __ C ******^"T**'***™*^ years, based on a 15 year amoritization. Indicate the amount your organization can afford to repay monthly on this debt. (This figure must compond to MNAF loan payment cn the cash flow projection sheet attached). S_ 7 7-^ D. MNAF requires collateral to secure its loans. List assets you will use to secure this loan. The collateral would be the land and building which has a replacement and land value in excess of $1,000,000.00 1. Is this collateral used to ^ure any other loan? Mo 2. If collateral is a foundation grant or government cwitract. list contact person and submit a copy of the award letter or contract Name: Phone Number; It FISCAL INFORMATION: .A. Provide an estimate of vour regular ongoing sources of revenue by percent: % Government grants/contracts ^ % Foundation/corporate grants ^ % Individual donations/memberships •^0^ % Earned income ^ % United Way ^ % Other B. Fiscal or accounting year: from 2 of 7 requested and the use of the fiinds.in the purchase and the rehabi11 talon tour financing need? Describe. ght Foundation as well as He have also been approved tions and Human Services for ,395.00 which is based on a 5 also based on an occupancy of jr budget would be $503,408.00 1994 based on a 15 year amoritization. > repay monthly on this debt, c^on the cash flow projection assets you will use to secure this loan, uilding which has a replacement and lio_ contract, list contact person and of revenue by percent: % Earned income % United Wav —% Other C. Name of bank and the services utilized ?^arquette Bank, Mound, MinnesotaChecking Account 034546 Savings Account 239095 O. Budget; Income Expense:, Last year Tins Y ear NEXT Year E. Current receivables: $ r,rant reimbursement only F. Current payables; S.-0-. G List all short and long term loan obligations rlli Balance P ayoff Date H. Cash Flow Projections Complete the attached cash flow projections, indicating your ability to repay the loan. Photocopy the cash flow form found on page 5 if the pa>ment period you are proposing extends boond six months. ATTACHMENTS; Please attach copies of the following; A: Annual Filing with the Minnesota Secretary of State Dr Current list of Board of Directors with address and length of association. ^ IRS tax-exempt letter establishing federal tax exemption. Letter confirming annual registration under the MN Charitable Solicitation Act. ■Er Last year's financial sutement/audit report. P. Current year's operating budget. G. Current year’s financials, including balance sheet and operating statement. Cash flow projections for the term of the loan isee attached). ‘ Signed Corporate Borrowing Resolution (see attached) Board minutes authorizing loan amount. recent form 990 filed with the IRS. Corporate articles of incorporation and bylaws. M. If this loan is sought to secure capitalization for earned income projects, include a business plan which desenbes the proposed project, its place in the market and the fiinctional management structure and associate budget. 3 of 7 ACCEPTANCE FEE POLICY MHAF !«• wtiWDd a new policy fequire* a 1% Saw irt <**>^ *^ TJ im fe wUI be oolkclBd at the poiia the request IS presented to the Loan CommiiiBe, and win be relumed widrei five twriaaf days if the loio request is oot approved. Tl* c-ire fee wUl be applied to priricipal and interest for koiu disbursed wiA^ If |«.«ver the bomreer unthdraivs the .plication once a MNAF rcsetvea the fi^it to retain the entire foe. B, -y WO-. > acceptance FEE POLICY «. ou. in the above paragraphs. 1 <»tay ita« tl* Wbnn-« »»»“ and accurate. /}' —.y CHAIR nGNATURE EXECUTIVE DI^RCTOR StONATVRE jjjY Peterman _ type OR PIUKT NAME Q^A/QA___________ DATE Valeric Hessburg type or print NAME 9/6/94------------- DATE TW A«-l IUp«t .fTW IU« involved in the pregraas aetivilies of the Foundation. B«. IM. i. •p.-r««< ‘ loan liinds frona the Foundation. If your organization needs technical assistance m preparing this applicatioii. please Minnesou Nonprofits Assistance Fund 2700 University Avenue West, Suite 45 St. Paul, MN' 55114. 612/647-0013 4 of 7 Miniesola NooproCils Assislaiice Fund Guh Flow ProjcciioiisName of OrgaanalkNi y Datecarnal Maa*_________________■ -------fmktmi Art^Aesaal pN^Mi aeiMt Pielwlid Actarf PN|HMi AMaal fraftetti AcaMi IbHl •OfMO noManwd jyr DbpMSai /mt /r*»»✓7«a»7:^ /JJ3 •/JJS /J3a /Jdi /3JJ wnw rM /9f^t Z¥tr$Atm IMwdWar MIIAPUm /7o«a Odwr IhUiaMtlfM mU9t.J rawssBaBHEax ^■^rimwiiiiiniTi OptfMiBft EipilWt /Atikih itt^C MNAPLaM PaiBwal i /Try OWertMM PaiaMM 1 OdMf /7€>e^ ** PiyawalarPMDwPairaUn lUlai DtekumaMMi yt>3j!y»<iSi CuliEaBMifSiKwi)//J >Wo /ml3» Btiiaaiat CMh Balaan Cll«l«CMtiaUMKC m * 1) ConGfmed graals are tboic wkicb have wrilica coaflrmatioa ffoai Ibc donor. 2) Ejqpectcd granU are Ibosc whicb have a high protoMUty of hetag awarded because of past history or icoeni liidiGalhms. Please see other side for detail. I'otal Past Due Payables c' — 5 nf 7 Minncsola Nooprofils Assistance Fund CM Flow FroiectioiisName ct Orgaatcatioa ^Dale cunwaHMua /99f p.tt£-. ftljiCtrf AcImI MMMi Acmrf Acmet rmmrr Artwt Pl^MWS AcUHt PMiMSW AmmI 1M tiBmwMi /7o«/T^m -a _____ •i /c S hv Im PMi Li^ao*/ (MM«W fliiii» IIIT,],1 MHAPIaaa CMcf TeUiaMelnH s#7iAPT P5??rs ___________ Cmh OiSbwwawHis HHI HHI Op fruit Elptnief J9M/2 J9yff \U7^o.i MNAPLam Pqnwai /7?r /Try'A/J^AyJk‘% (MMr Lsm fajFiMW Odwt ** Pqrawal of P hi Dm ParaMct TUUI OfahamaKalt _ --------------------Jmim HHH OUj-?bc Cmh&cew(8twM)c^y'/A A Cyo'ys cyfjo yfllx 1 Hymlnulum ^Ull EMtai Cteli Balanet 1 * I) Confirmed are those which have written confirmation from the donor. 2) Eipected granU arc those which have a high prohabiUty of being awarded because of past hiitoty or recent indications. Please sec other side for detail. Total Past Due Payables MiBBCSola NoaproCits Assstoace Faad Gtth Flow PrqieciNaaie of Orgaaizalkia Date / / 9/<l ^5^ConoalMoMh Vi,Vu r ] — Actort Artoa fiijortia AcMwl rNgMMi AMMl IhMl r—y- •Otmh /rw^/T^m —•A3J3 A5J5 /VAI 9ms RTP3 1 (MMWv - •-----n-s-PWMPvfVNp MNAPUaa Orher IhrataceripH sJ7A47_JJUJ2. ........ ' CtibDiihwwMMi OpMallaa Bm«hcs MHAPInM fafMMl ytrr /Tytr /rr€ Olksf Ims fiywi OllMr ** Pnaaeal «( fast Dm PayiMe* Thiat DhhMrtcuH j^3yu ,^u£hiaSOBBSsS±£a3= CHh Emm (Short)C i-7t>/7/Z Ct>y/<a-(2 BcfhMrisi Cilk Bilases EwMogCMhaaboce * I) CbaCrotcd grams are tliosewliicli have writleBGonfinnalkMifnMn the donor. 2) Eipected gnaU are those which have a high probaMUly ofbeiag awarded bccaose o( past hbtory or receni iadicilbos. Please see other side (or detail. ** I'otal Past Due Payables - O r r r.' r vestonica intarvantion- nnaf loan 08-15-1994 16:26:43 Pag* 1 Cospounding intarval: Monthly Annual parcantaga rata. . . Rata par coapounding pariod Equivalant daily rata. . . . Valuation data: 11-01-1994 9.500% 0,7917% 0.02603% Valua: $170»000.00 CASH FLOW ORTA First data Payaant aaount -I- Intarval Last data 12-01-1994 $ 1,775.18 180 Monthly 11-01-2009 AMORTZZATZON SCHEDULE - Noraal amortization Qata Payment Interest Principal 1 12-01-1994 1,775.18 1,345.83 1994 totals 1,775.18 1,345.83 2 01-01-1995 1,775.18 1,342.43 3 02-01-1995 1,775.18 1,339.01 4 03-01-1995 1,775.18 1,335.56 5 04-01-1995 1,775.18 1,332.08 6 05-01-1995 1,775.18 1,328.57 7 06-01-1995 1,775.18 1,325.03 8 07-01-1995 1,775.18 1,321.47 9 08-01-1995 1,775.18 1,317.88 10 09-01-1995 1,775.18 1,314.26 11 10-01-1995 1,775.18 1,310.61 12 11-01-1995 1,775.18 1,306.93 13 12-01-1995 1,775.18 1,303.22 1995 totals 21,302.16 15,877.05 14 01-01-1996 1,775.18 1,299.49 15 02-01-1996 1,775.18 1,295.72 16 03-01-1996 1,775.18 1,291.92 17 04-01-1996 1,775.18 1,288.10 18 05-01-1996 1,775.18 1,284.24 19 06-01-1996 1,775.18 1,280.36 20 07-01-1996 1,775.18 1,276.44 21 08-01-1996 1,775.18 1,272.49 22 09-01-199J5 1,775.18 1,268.51 23 10-01-1996 1,775.18 1,264.50 24 11-01-1996 1,775.18 1,260.46 25 12-01-1996 1,775.18 1,256.38 1996 totals 21,302.16 15,338.61 26 01-01-1997 1,775.18 1,252.27 27 02-01-1997 1,775.18 1,248.13 Balance at 11-01-1994 429.35 429.35 432.75 436.17 439.62 443.10 446.61 450.15 453.71 457.30 460.92 464.57 468.25 471.96 5,425.11 475.69 479.46 483.26 487.08 490.94 494.82 498.74 502.69 506.67 510.68 514.72 518.80 5,963.55 522.91 527.05 Balance 170,000.00 169,570.65 169, 168, 168, 167, 167, 166, 166, 166, 165, 165, 164, 164, 163, 163, 162, 162, 161, 161, 160, 160, 159, 159, 158, 158, 137.90 701.73 262.11 819.01 372.40 922.25 468.54 011.24 550.32 085.75 617.50 145.54 669.85 190.39 707.13 220.05 729.11 234.29 735.55 232.86 726.19 215.51 700.79 181.99 157,659.08 157,132.03 r vMtonJu intervention- nnef loan 08-15-1994 18:28:43 Page 2 Pat Date 28 03-01-1997 29 04-01-1997 30 05-01-1997 31 08-01-1997 32 07-01-1997 33 08-01-1997 34 09-01-1997 35 10-01-1997 38 11-01-1997 37 12-01-1997 1397 totals 38 01-01-1998 39 02-01-1998 40 03-01-1998 41 04-01-1998 42 05-01-1998 43 08-01-1998 44 07-01-1998 45 08-01-1998 48 09-01-1998 47 10-01-1998 48 11-01-1998 49 12-01-1998 1998 totals 50 01-01-1999 51 02-01-1999 52 03-01-1999 53 04-01-1999 54 05-01-1999 59 08-01-1999 58 07-01-1999 57 08-01-1999 58 09-01-1999 59 10-01-1999 60 11-01-1999 61 12-01-1999 1999 totals Payaent 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 21,302.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 21,302.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 21,302.16 Interest 1,243.96 1,239.76 1,235.52 1,231.25 1,226.94 1,222.60 1,218.22 1,213.82 1,209.37 1,204.89 14,746.73 1,200.38 1,195.83 1,191.24 1,188.62 1,181.96 1,177.26 1,172.53 1,167.78 1,182.95 1,158.10 1,153.22 1,149.29 14,098.14 1.143.33 1.138.33 1,133.29 1,128.20 1.123.08 1,117.92 1,112.72 1,107.47 1,102.19 1,096.86 1,091.49 1.086.08 13,380.96 PriiMipal 531.22 535.42 539.88 543.93 548.24 552.58 558.98 581.38 585.81 570.29 6,555.43 574.80 579.35 583.94 588.56 593.22 597.92 802.85 807.42 812.23 817.08 621.98 628.89 7,208.02 831.85 838.85 841.89 848.98 852.10 857.28 882.48 887.71 672.99 678.32 683.69 689.10 7,921.20 Balance 158,800.81 158,085.39 155,525.73 154,981.80 154,433.58 153,880.98 153,324.02 152,782.68 152,198.85 151,628.56 151,051.78 150,472.41 149.888.47 149,299.91 148,708.89 148,108.77 147,508.12 148,898.70 148.288.47 145,889.39 145,047.43 144,420.54 143,788.89 143,151.84 142,509.95 141,882.97 141,210.87 140,553.81 139,891.15 139.223.44 138.550.45 137,872.13 137,188.44 138,499.34 Grants;t) Coafimc4 OrMtt1♦Aaoaal CkccftifWrilteaOMinnatlioa DateafOraal DateHapcclc4____ __-A«]f AMi Imim I InfonaaliiM7C01^'“^Ayf/. ffiO 1 A , . !/ f f " * ' ' /--iL^ y 7S0 1/^y fx • • * • _ k .....ft " 12) liifiected Oraate Aaoaal Rci|actlcd Date ftopoaal SabaiiltcJ Date of Review Date Rapccted Wtif ia Grant Ita^ctadT %.0oo '^As'-e4r tXrxtVmx I<f?af* ii,o^c>" /./ / > f,f /# / ^/ # f *f, / / < / ✓/ ** f / # ^ ^# / *9 ✓ / / '* » ' * ✓ / r < <f *^ ^ / //•/ <'<^ / / ^ /// < /'r X/" y'/' fe'ff _✓ r #V" ^>'/' /'/' /y' ✓ ✓/ 6of7 Corporate borrowing resolution k . President Vice Presidents. Treasurer, Secretary, and Executive Westonka juthcriTH to borrow from time to time, in m>np.of.. „„m THE MINNEAPOLIS Folnoationnonprofit “v co^J^tlHon irom THE Minneapolis Foundation . expolwni. aulhonzeJ u> in its coiporaie name tfie tJu Ct»ion as .videncn oi such loan a«. of any «..nsion o, renewal thereof. RESOLVED Further that said obligations so transfer and deliver to said u Corporation as are agreed upon by them incurred such securities or other asse. \ j agreements ot and said Fund and to execute m the name ot the^Corp^ ^a^* srhS"ma“s;?s ?.r; ss'jr:.: :sz; — to such Fund from this Corporation time the provisions thereof shall be deemetl to be cumulative. rejolved Fu ^er ”^et doc “M^Ti^trf fTfi"” i» roS.«"th:;tiuI o^ro secur^ Uie name are hereby ra,ifi«l and approval. R esolved Further that this resolution shall remain in full force and effe revoked. This is 10 certify that ih-' f.vtdng is a itue copy ^ held on dirroiors of a Corpori on zt a meeting o ^ ,, ^.11 force and June 2e 1994__________________ effect. Acting Secretary. Board ot Dire^rs (Signature)^ ‘r'/cSi 19^ Date 7 of 7 r Mif#l£SOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGEUOr Mui^F»iM»y Urtd«nir#«irtQ 0*vtS«on ^ ^ SI. Paul. MN 5S101 l9Si J-a multi -family deferred LOAN/GRANT APPLICATION 1. -PRdGAAM AND AMf'UNI.AWPLVJNO •• * .»• -- • . FOR: - . -- - □ CM.>ae*r Ra»oi»tfig □ Housing Trust Fund Program LfiXHPieeraMi □ PybfiekfOaaiadTtafttawnal ,□ AitordaMo Rantaf Invostmon! Fund t HowtinePteeram □ T<«nOi0M>H0«i«9«2 1Q.QQQ^00 □ T.rg.fdHorn. Pwgr.* * a TMMWvyof TmtiiiionaiKMMiny ffoMN^hCltcr for victimt of Abuse □ Oiti«((spady):---------- Social Sacu'iir No|t). oi MN Tm IO No<t)- (tof an bofPo«*a«t. mdvtfng apowt^t) Westonka Intervontlon Project. Inc. AddrMS (SU mL CA v. Sui *. Zip coda) 3490 Lythrui Hay P.O. Box 34, Mound. Minnesota 55364 County ol Appiicani Valeric or Ckn Hessburg Executive Directors Hennepin •lapnono s; !»j!CPI L Typo el AppUcBMfOrgBmzatioo: (S Noi^H Agoncy/Corporaton □ Unit of Qovommoni □ Indfviduol a CHOO □ Housing Authonty/Communiry Dovolopmoni Agtncy □ For ProlH OgonnotioiuCorporaUon Othor (Spocily) III.W Addrota Of Pfopofty (iiraot City, Siata, Zp todo).Aga el kioiino ButMiiie: 2380 Shedywcod Raad Orono. W1 5S3S6________,, Hrnneoin--------- Nu BuiU In 1955 ■_ mBef el No.olUnit: No. of Sioriit: No. ol Bldga.: 9 siructurt Typo 1 ^ith walk out □ Eiovator 1 □ Row/Townhouto (3 WaA'Up □ Sinqto Family. Dupiti. otc. P|rnfng Spocoo Suffoco Covoiod It prapany in hiitorie doud or ^«naiad a h«io»e bwidiog? □ Vat 9 Ho Floodplain?a Yat Q No It iha Mopany in oompiianca «»ah cunam wng »aqui»a<nani»7 a Yaa □ No Currani Zonmg/Clattdcauon: Residential • Conditional Use Penult (ISSSSI^SCnW ogroo/nont. w/tie/>0v0ris tpp/coO/of O No teSuSa^r&ol'JuiVIop^®"^^”^*"^ purchase agreement rin<tnn tl/15/94 O Constact tor Oaad □ Othaf □ NonaTypa ol EaMing Loan: Tha MuMoaou Hout«e F«a«ca A«aocy 4oa. not d.tc.-n.na.a on m, bat.. o( .»:a. «kK. na.«n.l tat. faSgion. ago. Of dioobaiiy in ompioymont Of tno piovnion of lorvcos Equal Oppoflunily Housing and Equal Opportunity Ernpioymtni 7/94 UQ*I 6*«Kp't^ •' '’'•P*"” lAilacr. i nMWV SEE ATTACHED____________________ Pr*)*ct 4urt 0»**= Mnwiwnb^** iV tot*! <j PfO)»ct Co»npl*!lon b*to: ■’truiarv 1. 1?9S S»!u*;*t*P^oi cHT *1 ProJ*el: 375.000.00 ?ropo<i#«» U»o cl R#qM*»«*P Purchase and rehabiHtation of church ^ ■ ITCM LOAN AMOUNT WgQUCSTtA lfp0 et Acilvlly! D Acquit'tio^ Q Rental Otho« (Spociiv): (Ch*eh *11 boi** th*t *pp!y) □ N«m Consifucton □ Coop#r»t«va Q Rahabtlilaiion □ Homao^ntrihip it.tim.to Aitnu.1 Incm* *nA M.nMTn.M ^*^*"“*~ ^fF Total cooaaa Rom br Typt Anmitliy * Pfoootod t1?i jtiiinaitow^ Monthly UMtt paMPyOoetipiM ApiopbiM CPntMt RanloUMM) •2* 7/94 r IV. >r AOOmONAL AftOJECT ftrOHMATlON; ^»-«a addrwe aadi at lU Items bai^ ^ C=rj 0 Art you applying for funding undar tha 23% Ml*tSida 7 □ Vat □ No ^ *'* ^f>*>*** M »•« eommamant «( |ha ..gul* (ST 3ian^ tor four pfOfad. How will tha projact anabia your oryanitaiioiiiD moia a0 trrtY"iainnna to naadt m tha oommurtty^ tNhai ochar organaaimns ara provafNig houtmo or houtm ralaiad ui your aommunay? What ara lha gapt in tarvea that ara not bamg fiUad? ^ yo« of^a uniQua. mnovaiiva. or hava lha opacity o 'a.*va « amoaOi tor MHF A. t Oaserfeo Non Hous«o Sa»vicaa Previdad: □ Applicani Q Oihors J. Doicriba lha managamam plan for ttia proiaci. Oitcutt how you plan lo aatt. ram. or laata lha ropai*v induOm a lanam ar homaownar talaciion plan and what lypa of tuppon tarveat wd ba providad. 1 L For praiacit »h«h raquaa diaptacmg curtani lananit: fipiam ams uamgina particular pioparr niuhraaMraa o«piacamant if nacaaaarv anp mciuda a raiocanon plan lot dupiacad lanarMa V. ;^; AFFIRMATIVE ACTION REQUIREMENT -rT^T^rr Ihmm ifyiurt^ thtr ' •**^**« A CMfficM «l Compliwie* liom ih« Si«« 0«p«fim*ni o( Human Righit (fof Mwmaiion erf 2t -I’ras Mi”M?i?*uMr*uyi”!!!?li'!l“ '*** otganaaion has had Iasi than 20 amployaas ir the. ♦.lao» VI. - ATTACHMENTS NEEDED: i.. .•• . ■>!v*- • •. •■■'*»■. • 1. Pfiotographf . ^ 2. Lration map. 3. 5ypponiatlafi.ir * OrfS^to P"*^*** 0P«i«»n». ■ not sacu. ad. indcaa plant for *■ ,?r**^**iP oigAnaalion. Ana.** a lisi rf mambars ol tha govatnina bidy at tha 7* ••• tufrounding land uttt.: SSEJSSSSSnsrrSSiSS^^ la. .Agawnaloteiaa ioloniiaiion aa raouastad in Paw IV cl tha AaoiieaHon. _________________ (::2p— r St.^oiti{acius PTv^Ulitjiet/iista PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT 812<4M-1131 FAX448-1823 DM 911 CRNHC FUND (Donation*) F.O. Boa 349. St. BonL. MN SS37S »‘inn TO; FROM: DATE: SUBJECT; iWI# City of Ofono PtannirHl Co»wnit9tjo |4#nibf^ - e^tSTv Vi Craig A. Andorton Saglwnbar26.1994 i’ ^ COMMUNITY SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE \/ioia«» in our iocioty i* CTMBrig a sanio of fair to fireog cHizanii aia as Mihdraw from ataiiting Ihosa in naad. Thay baliava if thay S2^J2wibaplacadinhiin^I^ ThitthougWprocats»aatingtw^ K w. Chop.* to tha buWtt of our sociaty aM ona day ba ttia daetsion makart. chHdrancanrolaxandfaaltafa. Watlonlia mtarvantion has saarchad long and hard to locaia proparty for a shaliar. 31?.9 -Mity to absorb tha facts of an issua and atorosutt doudouf iudflwnt I oak that you liiton to tho good naighbor and a safa havan for victim* of domastic violanca. CAA.Iab SBRVINQ WfTH PRO)E. INTEGRITY AND EXCELLENCE TO PROVIDE QUALITY RESPONSIVE SERVICE. Rrirtfatf on racycMdAiPO' •5: Date:October 10, 1994 To;Jean Mabusth/Steve Sullivan From:Kurt Erickson RE:Domestic Abuse Shelters ? ""ts\:v. pSS;ii*?-4945, 1^ ’S fri9^~Ho“r“.*^“o»nt.d for ?n ch.ckin, i^*n of SJtobor 10, 1994 thoyfour call*; In 1993 had flva caiia, includa an hav« had £iva . ^!l?«,ifA«n®ou8 Dublic, danaga to proparty,att.iWt«l vahicla, thaft, .»^«caUjmi;ou. lock out, and *»'“■***• rnV1ar---‘-<"-T «ra tha donaatie, danaga nincallanaoua public, ^-hlola thaft. without actually pullingto proparty and -tta-ptad vahicla thaft. winn tha raporta, it ia ^la to dataraiw shaltar or paopla ataylng in ***• •,canaral araa. It ia cartainly cIS?"?Sit'tS?l*a« ~ iSvy dai«nda for aarvica cau.ad by thia. in apaaking to *'^^J;\2!rtaon,*phSSa ?S«;dnhl^Th^^«a “pr'S;5;^ howavar, thay fraquantly ara aU^V/i I-fSSJSon about problana s:ra\r “\v tSHv' “ "*-she was out of town on vacation for sonetiae yet. I spoke to Sojourner t^Kme 933-742?.^*^! ^talked with a Circle, Minnetonka, Mi ^ - ^^e program as Sue Aumner. I party who identified ^ith Suebut the person I was titvTA trt-ofd" ia'\“^iy“\:v“a rd‘VViVifleant problana. Sojourner is a facility ^?®f**f,y"n,/*,jjita*a*b^^ on a culde-sac, they 3^^ since they have gone in, SSiir7«™urw\rM\"nna“on^a'^^;y ^allowed a -axinu- of aixtaan people. The main problem that *v^ill^en two or that has been identified so far. Pag# #2 I callad Minnatonk# pravantion^apaciaiuft. A would huvo caking buck with Minnotonko, * aassaq# was ls£t snd xii cn who ststsd shs did not to Joyco tho criuo provntlon ruuponding to tho “•liio that th.r. -•• »y S gSm out infoSutlou withouts:.;s.ys •“ ?/i“rsi‘."ur.OT>Kn.:s ^l!2i“hS th. cull with th. lnfon..tion .. ruqu.«t.d. » ■ r BTK t ASSOC XRCHITECTS A BUILDERS WESTO PROGR 7 KA IWTERVENHON M SIFTER fi-Ari ) = 30^ L jPU-*-rH^ 1 1 ^ 1 iinnn KnSI u^vs/ep* L-cv^u /.ip"* BTK & ASSOC., LTD. architects 4 BUILDERS WESTONKAINTERVENTIOI^ PROGRAM SHELTER — wocrweif^^ r 6125505060 city op Plymouth Pag# 1-3 -00 620 S#p-30 Pri 10:05 1994 rLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE 1^ a Land Oaa PlMMi and c Po*l**l’FaiiNol# 7671 0U*C 3 ty Pacilltiea ^ KaU ether than aa Vbm M ^iTiN i •y ba located Ith regard to RlaaMd liikit 0«v< an iativi* in talatiev uaa* loeati pravlaiona tint A tfravliiff or City and in raeerdinp. PcnnirM A lot or plot oith tho ra<|uirad front# ^da and daalling or othar uaa aa allowod undar thia Ordinanea. of a aubdiviaion. awatiny all tha raoui aucb fora aa raquirad by tha County for ta of tha purpoaaa of raar yarda for a Public bblari wctara uhieh ara daflnad in Ninnaaota ttatutaa Saetlon loia.ooi, tubdiviaiona 1» and li; for purpoaaa of t^ Shoroland Huaunanant Overlay Diatriet# thia naana lakoa# ponda# and flowayaa of flora than 10 aoraa and atraaaia. eraaka. and vatar couraaa haring a total dralnago aroa of 3 aquara nilaa or mora. Thia doaa not naan a bo^ of watar craatad by a privaca uaar, whara thara uaa no pravioua ahoraland. aa dafinad by tha Oapartnant of natural laaourMa, for a tealgnatad private uao allouad by thia Ordinance and authoriaad by tha Da^rtnant of natural Raaoureoa. Tha official datamination of tha aiM and phyaieal liadta of lakaa# ponda, or flowagaa ahall be nada by tha Ceaniaaionar of tha Oapartnant of natural Kaaourcaa purauant to atatutaa. (Anand Ord. 94*10) Stata ¥r Aaaeb A hydraulic anginaaring tarn to daaeriba a longitudinal aagnant of a atraan or river influenced by a natural or nannada obatrvetien. lo an urban area# tha aagnant of a atraan or river betvean tuo conaacutxva bridge eroaaingo uould noat typically conatituta a reach. Aaeraatien Vahialo For puzpoaaa of thia Ordinan^, the include tha naaning of "recreational eaf^ping vehicle m daflnad in Ninnaaota itatutaa 127.14, Subd. 7; and travel trailora, pickup coachaa. notor honaa and eaaping trailara, •■“^•cturadhonaa" aa defined in thia taction, uhi^ art laaa than 40 feat in body length, converted buaaa. and convartad vana which can be and are uaad aa taaporary ditallinga for travel, racraational, and vacation purpoaaa. (Anandad Ord. l2-2<) nagional Plead A flood uhieh ia rapraaantativa of large flooda kn<^ to have occurred generally in Ninnaaota and raaaonataly characteriotic of wMt can be aupaetad to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude or tne 100 year recurrence interval. legulctery Flood Proteetien Klovatlen A point not leae than «e f©^ above tha water aurface profile aaaociatad with the regional flood ineraaaaa in flood haighta attributable to eneroachmanta cn tha flood plain. It ic tha elevation to which uaaa regulated by thia ordinance ara raquirad to be alavetad or flood proofad. Aaaidaatial Paoility A dwelling where a Stata-licenaed reaidentlal program, public or private, which for gain or otherwlea, *’*9'*'**\^y hour*par-dey aubatituta for care, food, lodging, training, aducatwn, auparviaion, habilitation, rehabilitation, or treatment for one pergena, aa dafinad by tha State Human Servlcaa Licenelng Act, outaiaa a 4*13 jl25505C6 CI*v C" o^vyOuTH Pa:j? 2 3 ?c 620 S»c-30 Pri 10:05 l9?*i rLYMOUTU ZONING ORDINANCE N\ SccUn 4« Sub Jlvisiow > •xc^pt in th» of porsons with Mntal rwtnrdation Jrtlirw th# progra* may be in the person'a hems. (Ord. MOD Mai^tial raeilltiea. Community Corrocttooal racilltlsa. Day Cars loclids*m*‘n*I^'o« SorUlp tiis?*fI»V*\soSn'tUl ShslMr*pu«poasa fSJ asstaurants IClass X) Traditional msataurant feed is wrvsd to a fust^ aild eonaumsd by him whlls ssatsd at a eountar or table. Cafstaria i. jai^yrsd by a customer whlls 90109 through a osrving 11ns and taken to a table for consumption, bo mors than 40 percent of the total food salea nay be for takeout or delivery. (Amend Ord. 92-2) keataurante CClaea XXI fast food Asataurants snd are served their food at a counter and take it to a table or counter where it is consumed. However, a significant number may take the fo^ eucaids to sat in an automobile or off the pr^iaea. Drive-in Restaurant boat customers consume their food in an automobi|^ regardlaas of how it is served. Carry Out and Delivery Aestaurant is prepared for consumption off the premises. Mwe than 2* the total food sales is purchased for takeout cr delivery. (Amend Ord. 93-2) Aoeflins That line at which an axterior wall aurfaca of a from the vertical plane end. typically, where the hor^ontel the roof eoseieocee. Meneard-llke roof treatments ^ cwi^sd as estensiona of a building wall aurfaca whan tha ^••f***^‘*“ appllad around tha antira parimatar of the building; ^J**^^*^ 211!maneerd-1ike treatment will be coneidered part of tha roof. (Amended Ord. HO. S4-24I Aubbieh Waste products which have composed wholly or partly of such materials ea garbaga, awaepinga, awlll, eleaninga, trash, refuse, induetriel eolid weetee or domestic solid weetee; orgenie ^••***_ ^ residue of enimele, fruit, or other vegeteble or animal kitehan, dining room, market, food eetabliahmmt ox wy plsM handling mast, fowl, fruit, grain, or vagatablaa; offal, •®'**^,**®T*®** or the carcass of animals; tree or ehrub trisminge, or graee cllijpinga, brick, plaater, wood, metal, . roofing matarlala, pips or otntr waata mattar resulting frtwi the demolition, alteration or construction of buildinga or atructurea; accumulated waste meterlale, cane, ueea conteinere, boxes and packing materials, junk vehlclea. junk, Christmas trees, rocks, aod, dirt, glass, parts, cement brick, leaves, bum barrels, household furniture, toys, floor coverings, fabric, drain oil. fluids, or other such eubetance which may become e nuisance. lAmen Ord. S7-31) School A buildins leed for the purpose of elementary or aacondary which meats all the reguiremanta of coepulaory edueati^ laws or c State of Minneaota. and not providing raaidantial acconmodationa. sanior (Aider ly) Cltlsen Rousing Hultiple ramily Dwellings 1^1 designad. built, and oparated for axclusiva occupancy at laaat 55 years old. Sanior Cititen housing shell include certain ancillary facilities and epeclal features aaaoelatad with living neeoa 4-14 6125505060 H. 4$. 46. 47. CITY OP PLYMOUTH PagP 3'3 uOD 620 S«p-30 Pri 10:08 1994 PLYMOUTH 20HIH6 OROIHAHCE DISTRICTS FROl R-IA P R-1B R-2 >R-3 R-4 \ Aiikbri • <••1 49. Section 7, Subdivision C USES •Dey Cert Facility serving 12 or fewer persons In a Single Faally Detached Dwelling. •Residential Facility serving 6 or fewer persons In a Single Family Detached Dwelling. -Residential Facility.serving 7-16 person of an persons operated on the premises allowed Hultip* Dwelling or Dwellings, lowed Multiple Family ellinos. as regulate In Section 9. -Residential Facility serving over 16 persons operated on the premises of an allowed Multiple, Family Dwelling or Dwellings, as regulated In Section 9. -Residential Shelter, as regulated In Section 9. (Nos. 43-47 Ord. 89-38) •Nursing Home, Residential Facility, serving more than six persons, Residential Shelter and similar properly licensed and sanctioned treatment facilities In operation as of November 20, 1989. (Ord. 90-18) 7-8 nrn tf"orand m«mo7?^ |***»—— Vj? f)\Ar>kht±u D«pi. PMd ZONING ONDZNANCE SECTION 300.IE PAGE 73 'licanaad r«sid«ntl*l c«r» f*cllltl»» or comwmlty rMidontiol ear* fAcllitio# for •!* or fwor porsono locotod iithiS 1/4 «!!• of anothor •Imil.r focllity or for .oro than -l« ArVffnt "* rth*r ch«rltrt>l«, r«liglou., wunwllnq or thormpoutle oorvleo ontlty involving •chodulod (»«ndod W ordlnonco •7-4S0, l-»o-*7.) 11 J.OOO oquoro foot of lot oroo for ooeh ovornlqht ' rooldont, boood on prepoood oopoeity; *’ ”2r^SfrroVlU^t' SliS*S“jJo^?ii?^^?p.“*ty,'" •' s."SSK.iii!a.?5trts ssriSiS^ city eouneili ¥r>MftLo aonorotiont A dotoilod docuMontotlon of tr'oiilS* S^\o2 •JtibllihSd .?*fSlSr!iT^(AMSSriSr oidinAnco®78-508, used by iwro thon ono lot, \%\ tor oroDorty lor^tod whoro traffic f^ro* tho ’ KSportT«in ““ p?/.*JLT.a IloMl rooidontial atraat bafora raaehing a - -,,,«-nr- tsr Av^arial atraat (for axaapla» a cul-da-aac) traffic generation ahaXl not axcaad 23 vahiela tripe par day? el for proporty loeotod on o l^ol otroot "®*' tS pSroSroph b obovo. trofflc qonorotlon oholl not •xcaad 32 vahiela tripa par day? ■" SifS atraata. 9. no on-otroot porKlnqparking oholl bo roqulrod by tho city Mooo on and rooldont noodo of oa<* oj^ciflc foelllty^^^^^ drivowayo ahall bo of *_ ^ ogulppod with r‘!r ist,.. ~LS± r ^ ^ 44 C • ^ 4- »> 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 300.16 PAGE 74 irgi;-?J15^s6i •-1-S0.) *11 f*olliti*» to confor* to th* r*quir*»*nt* of th* Minnooot* *t*t* building cod* *nd fir* cod*; ___( iapooto. L*nd*c*p* •Cjroonxng k « A_ _ _J * * ▲_ _ _ _ _ th* typ*, - - -• •poclfle f*ellity; outaviiMion of d*t*llod progr*N inforaotion including go*l*« policl**» *ctivlty *oh*dul*« *t*ffing p*tt*rn* *nd tSgItJd c*p*city which »*y r**ult in th* iapooition of ]fMSon*bl* condition* to linit th* off •■it* l*p*ot*; th* f*cillty to b* ov*r***n by • bo*rd of diroctor*; inoorpor*tion to th* city; nalvhberhood r*pr**«nt«tlv«» to b« tnvlt»d to »U on m bo*rd of director* or *dvi*ory bo*rd if r*guir*d by th* city; for by th* *ppllc*nt; •ubnisaion of * fora*l *lt* *nd building pl*n * d*t*min*tion of n**d for *uch r*vl*w 1* n*d* by th* city; *nd addition*! condition* nay ^ r*yiir*d by th* order to addr*** th* *p*eific inpact* of * propocafl facility. privata, nen*profit racraational facilitia* aa a principal u** J 10/13 94 10:25 F.\X 012 4T2 0C2C cm OF MOITCDI" tKond fax tranaw^itfi l^uoi PUBLIC MeABtNO NOVCB CnVOPMOUND MOUND, MfNNeSOTA CASE NO. 94^21 ’S'VV^N Noncf Of A HMUG HfAMNQ TO CONllOCfl THI fOUOWIMO: 1.AN AMOmitNT TO THE MOUND ZONNUO ONDINANCE, EECTIM SoSTxtow * owxmoii FO* SHElTiM.' ALtOWAMJ IN THE QENEIIAl EUSINEtt li-EI lOMNO OUTMCTE EY ISSUANCE Of A eONOmONAL USE PESMIT. NOTICE IS HERESY QIVMI* th«t tht City Council of the City of Mound will hold a public hMriniTSi •" ot th. C«v of Mound otfic « S341 Maywood Road. Tha following will ba conaldarad: « Ordmanea AmandiiMQt to Scctlon 3B0:310 to add tha following definition lor .IV^ ond oporatod by non-p»om eorporotloiw i-M provido •hoct-torm houting for wtetlnw c f domaatic abuca.” 9 lino OrdinancaArouidflMOi to modify tha text of tha axiating coda to add "Victlnw of oimi^ Abi»rShohofV^^^ tho Kiting of UMi iKowiblo in tho ton^l (B-2) on tha zoning map. All pirsoni ippiaring at Mid hearing with raferenca to tha above will ba giwan tho opportunity to ba hoard at this meeting. ■ ■ r-. francene C. Clark, «*.. *y Clerk To be publishod In *The Laker” May 30, 1994 r P Part P*arr Center Suite MS45 5775 Ha>2aia Boulevard MUtUteapoUs. W.' 55416-1234 Fax (6t2) 595-4473 Phone (6 1 21595-4400 S«pt«ab«r 28, 1994 Ms. JMIUM lUbust ^ ^ ^BuildiiKi and Zonlnq Adainiatrator City of Orono 2750 Kolloy parkway Orono, MM 55323 Dear Me. Nabust: T ae writlno in favor of the conversion of Grace Baptist Church, orSUrio a abuse aha I tar by tha Waatonka intarvantion Project, Inc. In w 35 veers of experience in fund raisiiHI have worked for several^halfwai^ housH all the way froe chemical dependency and Mxual orientation facilities to chemically dependent youth facilities. All of these centers have been an asset to their communities Siie wt SIusS nJiShborhood hardship. The most «•»<>“• facilities that we worked for are the l^wis Houses in Buimsville fnrf Annin Vallsv. Both of thsss facilities are considered neighborhood improvements by their “•^^^rs. The Omegon facility in Hopkins is integrated program operating out of an gld school building. Grace Church ia ideally locaW to aerve Weatonjc^ i!li*?or"* the profeaaion and you will diacover there a • "•«* facilities to house abused mothers and their children. P.fcCcWit- CITY OF OHONO Registered In the State of Minnesota Sen log the ipper MIdixest. r SOIOURNER PROJEa INC. Servin9 Battered Women and Their Children 612933-7433 Shelter 612 933-7422 Voicf/TDD CoftwmifMtv Advocacy 612 9JS 1004 InicfVMtiofi 612 93S7007 P.O.«m272 HopkimiKmiSMS n \ Septeflber 15. 1994 n To V/ho* It !1ay Concern: Sojourner Project has offered shelter to battered wouen and their chlidr^r for over 15 years. To ny knowledge, there has never been an incident of violenci y a perpetrator at or near our shelter. It is generally known that our shelter is a secure facility and that we have a very good relationship ^tih our local police departaent who will provide extra support if needed. Our shelter Is not able to house aost of the battered woaen and children who contact us needing a safe place to stay. Historically and currently, a vast aajorlty of the thousands of woaen requesting and using our snelter services, and who we aust turn away due to lack of space, are froa the inner city of Minneapolis. We work with all woaen we turn away In an atteapt to find other options for their iaaedlate safety. It is getting increasingly difficult to find and connect battered woaen and children with safety options that adequately aeet their needs. Based on our experience at Sojourner Project, there is a critical nwd for additional shelter space to aeet the needs of battered woaen and children particularly froa the aetropolitan area. Sincerely. Sue Auaer Executive Director United Wtv o September 10» 1994 J To Whom It May Concern: «a John’s WELCA (Women of the Evangelical Lutheran Wieve there is a great need in our area for a Women's SJielter. We know that the sight ol the former Grace Baptist Church in Navarre would be perfect We are excited and have great hope that v« can have Ws SilTJ^ our ama. The need for a shelter « past due. ve have supported Westonka Intervention for many years atK M m oontSSTto support them as spiritually. It is in our Constitution s Statement of Purpose o commit ourselves to this project. We believe that you will give this shelter your support as well!* Sincerely, Sandy Schultz Presi^nt St. John's WELCA September 15, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: St. John's WELCA (Women of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America) has financially supported the Westor Intervention for many years. The following amounts have been paid out to Westonka Intervention in the past years. In 1994 we budgeted a hioher amount in the hopes of having our own shelter. 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 $1.000.00 500.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 Our WELCA Board has already voted to give $750.00 for 1995. We feel we could add to this amount by a few hundred dollars by conducting an additional fund raiser in support of a Westonka Shelter. Submitted by: Sandy Schultz WELCA PRESIDENT r (3) GOVT LOT 5 COVT LOT / N P^»SmiS!fE£££|££! f <91 "*L*ri a - • r A: L % *3 rflWt*s ■V ■>'V psJ®X £H Pi mm tir- fL . St I Pf; ^ *" >Tt'*** .’ rffr^^i ^ .S •. ->. ^ -^ V . •, w* * -o *. *- »«• •^- ;. • • %' -’- - • JfC* . ■ .>, .•■ --. '•■ -Xc •- ■• • • • ■ V I: t;^ . ;• '?•:• yk'. i V’ ^‘• •^ * ^‘. I*** • u *'^ \ < - • ••*;i-' Ci' >■-> ? i.- "rr f % ^ i L yi c "■:/ ^'Xl-0':^^-; • » • ■ i' ' ^ L*''•»te r RttaM Salts Buaintss Oistrici Lalwstiort Buskitts District Shopping Cantor Susintss District Offico And Proltssional Busintss Districtm limited Neighborhood Putiness District. Plonned Urbon Oevtiopmtnt industrial District i •./%• I■k 0 •:40 looted by Ordinance !/?• OeccuAtr Effective Jsngsry l, If As amended by: , M Ordinance 185, June 14* lf76 0 Ordinance 189, November 22, lf78 -t- C Ordinance ?01, October ll, 1977 ' ^ Ordinance ?06, January 9, 1978 Ordinance 213, October 78, 1978 Ordinance ZU* November 14, 1978 Ordinonce 228. February II. 1880 0 0 LR-IC-I !l b'^in esi.M la m tar. a- LR-1C \ " ^B-4 I n I LR'IB I •• # # IT ;%C'. - • #••••i « • • r ^ *•*4 .0INSERT • • KiawARDP ARFA DETAIL MAP ■onestroo Rotfnt AndtrUkA Associates fnglnttrs • ArchUtctl October !!• 1W4 w c C«i M ff ft ft Lft ff ft c K a ff ft ft. ft ff •f ft AiCf C M ft ff. MMt Mi«A li^ ft ^wmmnPt PmJ i Ojrv»f\ AiA > CtHi^ *1 Mr. John Oerhirdson CityoCOrooo P.O. Box 66 Ciytul Bay. MN 55323 Re: Broiw Rond Reconitniction Wnteitonm Rond Culvert File 13972 Dear Mr. Gerhardson «.auot o» $1WM «> »• *"• Youn veiy Wily. BONECTROO. ROSENE ANE.ERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC, Harlam M. OUon HMOak Endoiures 2335 Wwt Hl9»nw 1*T ♦c* Qco ^TQ .ic-;QT 966T-TT-0T atyofOto*>.P O P”“»^^*y****°^**^^ Suit lo Ociobcf 1.1994 -■■■..L. a;.._i^ an CmM, Ro»l 12 No1>- B»Bilo. MN 553» P-tT October 4,1994 KEQUCST por payment WATERTOWN ROAD CULVERT • SAP 152-103 01 FUc No. 13972 SUMMARY 1 Ot^imI Co#D#ct A*ot*ol 2 Chaafe Order - AdditioB 3 Cbaage Order - DeduciioB 4 Revised CoBlracl AmooBl 5 Value CoBtpleled lo Date 6 Material OB I laod 7 Abwub I Earaed 8 1 Tf ReUioase 5% 9 Sub-Toul 10 Less ABiottot Paid Previously 11 amount due this request for payment no $ s ReooBUieBded for Approval by: [OSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCUTES. INC. Approved by Cooiracior •UiTALO IITIIMINOUS b inc < Approved by Owner: CITT or ORONO SpedCed Cooiracl Completion Dale: June 16,1995 Date:. I S66»S0b.50 s 566,5O6J0 $19,512.00 s OOO $19,512.00 s 975.60 $• 1,536.40 5 0.00 $ 18,53<.40 VmM C#«trMA Qn—lity VmM,Qmmmuyij Pfowa North Pit* a . Sif«€t - SAP 152-107^1 210L501 CkariMCx*) 2101^ Gnibbisf (tree) 2104^1 Remove «o«cfele curb & *«uef 2104^1 Remove pip* culvert 2104 JOS Remove bitemieoe* pavemeet 0104.001 Relocate mailboae*. stpe«. etc. 010S.009 Geoleatile fabric. Type V 2105J01 Coouitoa eacavatioe (P) 2105J07 Subf rade eacavatioo 210SJ21 Grauular borrow (CV) 2105 J35 SaKaged top«>il (CV) 2211J01 Attregatc base. CIS. 100% crushed quarry rock 2331.504 AOl bit. material for mixture 2331.508 Type 41 weariug course mix. (I9*)5) 2331.510 Type 31 biuder course mixture 2331.514 Type 31 base course mixture 233U18 Bitummouf mixtur* for walk SP-1 Driveway restoratmu 2357.302 Bitumiuous material for lack coat 0412.004 Modular block retaiaiaf wall 2451.511 Coane filter aggregau (CV) 2502J41 4“ perforated PE pipe drain 2506J22 Adjust frame and ring citg. 2521J0I 4" concrete walk 2531JOl Concrete curb A gutter-Desigu B618 SP*2 Reinforcing fot cone, curb & gutter 0511.002 Pedestrian curb ramp 25OJ.001 Traffic control 2S64J31 Fum.* inst sign panels. Type C 0564.002 Pavement message (left arrow) paint 0564.002 Pavement message (left arrow) epoxy 0564.003 4* wide solid line, yellow paint 0564.003 4* wide soUd line, yellow epoxy RP-l AC 0.2 2.000.00 AC 0.2 2.000.00 LF 40 4.00 u-540 7.00 SY lOJOO 1.25 LS 1 500.00 SY 14.400 1.00 CY 12.000 3.25 CY uoo 4.00 CY 600 10.00 CY 1.8.S0 5.00 TN 9.700 8i0 TN 231 125.00 TN 1.0.50 17.00 TN 1.400 15.00 TN 1.7.50 15.00 TN 580 30.00 SY 5.50 10.00 GL IJOO 1.00 SF UOO 13.00 CY 50 !0.00 LF 850 7.00 EA 4 200.00 SF 20 5.00 LF 7J30 5.00 U-360 OJO FA 5 125.00 LS 1 53)00.00 »F 37.5 35.00 EA 1 30.00 EA 1 50.00 LF 5JOO 020 LF 5,500 02a d___ __ r w. itm 0S64.e03 4* Hfokea yellow pant 0564.M3 4* btokeo lio*. yellow epoxy OSM.603 4* wide »olid liiK. wbiie paial 05M.403 4 ’ wide solid lirnt. while epoxy 0564.603 6'solid liM. while paint 0364.603 6' solid line, whiu epoxy 0564.603 24* solid line, while paint 0.361.603 24* solid line, while epoxy 2.371 JOI Sprece Colorado Bhie 6* hi. BAB 257l_302 Maple Segar 3* caL BAB 2571-302 Ash SnaHiil 3" Cat. BAB 2373-303 Sih fence, preasaemblcd 2575-301 Roadside seeding 2575.502 Seed, mixterc 500 2573.505 Sodding. Type lawn 2575.511 Melch material. Type I 2575-319 Disk anchoring 2575 J23 Wood fiber blanket 2575-331 Commercial fertilizer, analysis 20-1010 Total A • Street • SAP 1.32-107-01 Part B - Storm Sewer • SAP 152-107-01 2501-315 ir RC pipe apron 2.301-315 1.3* RC pipe .ipron 2301 JI5 24* RC pipe apron 0501.602 Trash gnard for 15* RC pipe apron 0501.602 Tr.xsh gnard for 24* RC pi|K apron 2503-31 1 12* RC pipe sewer (O. V) IX*s. 3006 2.303.51 1 15* RC pipe sewer (O. V) Dcs. .1006 2503-31 1 ir RC pipe sewer (CL V) Dcs. 3006 2503.5 1 1 21* RC pipe sewer (CL V) Dcs. 3006 SP-3 Cbnitme* catch basin. Des. 34 SP4 Conslmct catch basin. Des. 3-6 SP-5 Cbnslnicl CBMH. Des. 3-5 RP-2 Un« Un«On—Hlf rrtm TnDair LF 500 0.20 LF 500 0.20 LF 100 1.25 LF 100 1.25 LF 320 1.25 LF 320 1.25 LF 60 1.25 LF 60 1.25 F.A 50 157.00 EA 25 235.00 EA 25 235.00 LF 700 2.00 AC U 150.00 LB 150 3-30 SY 9.400 1.40 TN 3.0 150.00 AC 1-3 55.00 SY 200 130 TN 0.7 400.00 EA 3 400.00 EA 2 425.00 EA 1 550.00 1 EA 2 .300.00 EA 1 SOOjOO ! LF 410 23.00 LF 470 25.00 LF 684 3140 300 LF 156 33.00 164 EA 2 500.00 EA 7 700.00 EA 11 1200.00 3 S0.00 530.00 500.00 9450.00 54aoo 3400.00 L VmM QmmAkf UaH nte T«IMt tM SP-6 Cp«itn*cl iiikt control ftmcliif® Design *l-2* din, SP-8 Conocct to c*»t stonn manhole SP-f Cm inlo cxistinf storm imcf RMdom rip f*p. Cl in • DELETED Total B-Stonn S«««r-SAP 152-107-01 Watcrt«w»o Road Coivcft PartC • SAP 152-1034)1 2101.501 Clearia* 2101.506 OniM»i«f 2104.501 Remo** pif* 2104.505 Ranovc P*^"**“‘ 2104.509 Remow mard potu 0105.609 Ocoicitlile l-ibric. Type V 2105.501 Cofiiiitoo cxcavatino (P) 2105.521 Otaoebr honow (OO 2105J23 Common borrow (CV) 2105.535 Salvared lopwU (CV) niijoi AaxpM quarry rock 2221.501 Aggregate sbooldcriag. CU<a 5 100% crushed quarry rock 2331.504 AC-1 bit. matcriil for niKturr 233lii08 Type 41 wearing course nintuie 2331.514 Type 31 base course mature SP-1 Driveway restor.stion 2357..502 Bituminous material for tack coat 2451.501 Structure c*c.iv.slion. Cl U (P) 2451.511 Coarse fUter aggregate (CV) 2501-511 ir CM pipe culvert 2501.511 4r RC pipe culvert.a.4.Det. 3006 2501.515 ir CM pipe .apron 2501-515 IT RC pipe apron 2501JI5 4r RC pipe .apron 0501.602 Trash guard for 48* RC pipe apron EA EA EA CY GL CY CY LF LF EA EA EA EA I 1 28 100 750 120 50 124 2 I I 1 1.150.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 AC OJ 2.000.00 AC OJ LF 61 2aoo SY IJOO 1.25 EA 40 10.00 SY 1600 1.00 CY 1.450 3J0 CY 600 10.00 CY 1.000 6.00 CY 300 6.00 TN 1.500 8J0 TN 130 10.00 TN 18 125.00 TN 135 17J0 TN 180 16l00 SY 30 10.00 1.00 4.00 14.00 24.00 140.00 70.00 400.00 U70.00 9503)0 S19J1X00 RP-3 M k SP-7 ComlHK* i«le* ««»••*•* »tw«**'** Desiga 4-2. 6* du- 2SII.S01 Raadom rip rap. Cl IV • DEUTTED 2SS4J01 Trair« bainei. Oes. B*307 2SS4.509 Oaala poal. Type A 2SS4311 Aachoria* *a»*»My * P***® ***** 2554.523 Twirte4 cb 4 ireataieal 25«3.«0I TrafTie eoalfol 05M.403 4* wi*le *oM liac. yefcw paia* 0544.403 4* wide solid Uae. while paint X573-503 Sih fcace. preasscaibled 2575-501 Roadside seedinf 2575-502 Seed, atiatare .500 2575 J05 Soddiof. Type Uiwa 2575-511 Mnkh material. Type I 2575iiI9 Disk aachoria* 2575 J31 Cbannercial Icrtitaer. aaalysis 20-10-10 Total C - SAP 1.52-103-01 Caoltact Uaa Uab QnaaSiiy Prtw EA 1 IJOO.OO CY 28 0.00 LF 500 laoo EA 82 25.00 EA 2 200.00 EA 2 450.00 LS 1 LF 1.100 0.20 LF 1.100 0.20 LF 300 2.00 AC 0.4 200.00 LB 40 3J0 SY 700 1.50 TN 0.8 1-50.00 AC 0.4 75.00 TN 0.1 400.00 S0.00 Bme bid for rip rap win aot he paid la th« cs Ro-sd North Part P - Storm Scwcr-SAP 152-1074)1 SP-IO Cable eoaerete. CC-20 Total Part B - Storm Sewer 256 S.OO S0.00 Wat«^rtown Rn.id Culvert PartC - SAP 152-103-01 SP-ll Cable concrete. CC-35 Total Part C - CuKert 6.00 saoo RP-4 r Total A • Sited SAP 152-1074)1 Total B - Stono Sco«f SAP 152-1074)1 Total C - CaKerl SAP 152-I03-01 Toul Alt. - Part B Total Ah. - P»rt C S OkOO I9JI100 aoo 0.00 0.00 S19J 12.00 Total Wofk Cooipleted to Date RP-5 Anovat Mapitftd 19412.00 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIONDATE: ITEM NO Dcpartmciit Approval: NaaM John R. Gerturdsoo Title Public Works Director Admiiiistrator Reviewed: _____________\ % Afenda Sccdbfi: Public Works Real Deacription: No Parking Brown Road North During discussions dettrminii^ the width of Brown Road North, it was decided to construct the road at a 28 ’ width and restrict parkii^ on both sides. Councilmembers were very concerned about the number of no parking signs that would have to be placed. Typically signs are placed 200 ’ apart which would require nineteen signs on each side of the road. There is no set distance according to the law. It depends on the design of the roadway and "what is reasonable". The City Engineer has indicated it may be reasonable to place the signs 500’ apart, which would require eight signs on each side of the road. If it is determined by the police chief and myself that a greater disunce between signs is reasonable, that is what will be done. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: It is recominroded that Council adopt Resedution No. Road North from Highway 12 to County Road 6. restricting parking on Brown 140640 0i» % V RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING BROWN ROAD NORTH le ly le id at WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal organizatimi existii^ under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City has approved construction plans for the reconstruction of Brown Road North from Stale Highway 12 to County Road 6; and WHEREAS, the width of the road will be 28 feet; and WHEREAS, the 28 foot width is not adequate for parldrig. NOW, THEREfORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby restrict parking on Brown Road North from State Highway 12 to County Road 6. Adopted by the City Council of the City of OrofK), Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of October, 1994. ATTEST; Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Page 1 of 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION WiWCJUlEEraisOCT 2 4 J994CITY OF •: INODATE: October 20. 1994 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Naaic Ron Moorse Title City Administrator iiiistnitor Reviewed:Agenda Section: CRy AdmiaistraCon Item Dcacript Sump PumD I :tk>n Ordinance At the October 10 Council meeting suff proposed an ordinance which allowed for a sump pump inspection program to be carried out over the next two winter seasons and imposed a surcharge on those not in compliance at the end of this period (March 1, 1996). The Council approved this ordinance with a change to apply the surcharge if the property is not in compliance within 14 days of the initial determination of noncompliance, rather than waiting until March of 1996. The ordinance has been revised to eliminate the March ’96 compliance date. Compliance is now required within 14 days and those not in compliance are subject to the surcharge after the 14 day period. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the attached revised sump pump inspection ordinance. ORDINANCE NO.SEO SERIESAN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORONO CITY CODE SECTION 3.20 RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO SEWERAGE SERVICE. AND THE CITY'S FEE SCHEDULE ORDINANCE PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATKXf THEREOF The City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota ordains: Section 1. Municipal Zoning Code Section 3.20, Subd. 6, Paragraph G is hereby deleted in its entirety. Section 2. Municipal Zoning Code Section 3.20 is hereby amended to add the following language as Subdivision 7, and to renumber current Subdivisions 7 through 9. Subd. 7. Prohibited Discharges of Groundwater/ Stormwater into the Sanitary Sewer System. A. Prohibited Connections. No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged, directly or indirectly, any stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, or cooling water to any sanitary sewer. Any person havina ' roof drain, sump pump, unauthorized swimming pool aischarge, cistern overflow pipe or surface drain connected and/or discharging into the sanitary sewer shall disconnect and remove any piping or system conveying such water to the sanitary sewer system. B. Authority to Inspect. Every person owning improvea real estate that discharges into the City's sanita^ sewer system shall allow inspection by authorized City employees or its agents of all properties or structures connected to the sanitary sewer system to confirm there is no sump pump or other prohibited discharge into the sanitary sewer system. C. Correction of Violations. Any owner of any property found to be in violation of this section shall make the necessary changes to comply with this ordinance, and such change shall be verified by authorized City employees or its agents. Any property or structure not inspected or not in compliance shall, following notification from the City, comply within fourteen (14) calendar days or be subject to the surcharge as provided in Paragraph F below. D. Discharge. Existing buildings with sump pumps and all newly constructed buildings with sumps shall have a discharge pipe installed to the outside wall of the building. The pipe attachment must be of rigid permament-type plumbing such as PVC, copper or galvanized pipe. The discharge shall extend outside of the 1 ECOND SERIES f CODE SECTION 3.20, TO SEWERAGE SERVICE, JLE ORDINANCE )LATION THEREOF Minnesota ordains: de Section 3.20, Subd. 6, its entirety. de Section 3.20 is hereby »ge as Subdivision 7, and to tirough 9. Discharges of Groundwater/ Sewer System. nections. No person shall discharged, directly or surface water, groundwater, ige, or cooling water to any havino c »-nof drain, sump pool discharge, cistern drain connected and/or sewer shall disconnect and :oiiveying such water to the spect. Every person owning Ischarges into the City’s ill allow inspection by ts agents of all properties le sanitary sewer system to pump or other prohibited ewer system. olations. Any owner of any tion of this section shall comply with this ordinance, rified by authorized City property or structure not )liance shall, following omply within fourteen (14) the surcharge as provided Lsting buildings with sump cted buildings with sumps stalled to the outside wall :tachment must be of rigid s PVC, copper or galvanized . extend outside of the foundation and may not be pumped directly onto any public right-of-way unless approved by the Public Works Director or the Director's designee. Any disconnects or openings in the sanitary sewer shall be closed and repaired in compliance with applicable codes. E. Continued Compliance and Reinspection. Upon verified compliance with this Chapter, the City reserves the right to reinspect such property or structure at least annually to confirm continued compliance. Any property found not to be in compliance upon reinspection, or any person refusing to allow their property to be reinspected shall, following notification from the City, comply within fourteen (14) calendar days or be subject to the surcharge hereinafter provided for. F. Surcharge. A surcharge set by an ordinance passed by the City Council is hereby imposed and shall be added to every utility billing to properties nor in compliance with this Chapter. The surcharge shall be added to every quarterly utility billing until the property is in compliance. If the surcharge is not paid xn a timely manner, the delinquent payments may be certified for collection with the following years’ property taxes. G. Temporary Waiver. The City Council, upon recommendation of the City Administrator and City Engineer, shall hear and decide requests for temporary waivers from the provisions of this ordinance where strict enforcement would cause a threat to public a<“fety because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. .Any request ^ temporary waiver shall be submitted to the City Administrator in writing. Upon approval of a temporary waiver from the provisions of this ordinance, the property owner shall agree to pay an additional fee for sanitary sewer services based on the number of gallons discharged into the sanitary sewer system as estimated by the City Engineer. H. Drainage. Stormwater and all cpther unpolluted drainage shall be discharged to such drainage facilities as are specifically designated by the City Engineer. I. Remedies. The imposition of the surcharge shall not limit the right of the City to seek an injunction in District Court ordering the person to disconnect the non-conforming connection to the sanitary sewer or from pursuing any other legal remedies available, or in the alternative, the City may correct the violation and certify the costs of correction as an assessment against the property on which the correction was made. Section 3. Section Fee Schedule of the Orono City Code is hereby amended by adding the following: Type of Charoe/Fee City Code Reference Sanitary Sewer Surcharge 3.20, Subd. 7, Paragraph F Charge/Fee $100/month Section 4. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect and shall be enforced from and after the date of its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this _ _ day of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1994 by a vote of _ _ _ _ ayes and_ _ _ nays. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor - 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: October 20, 1994 OCT 2 4 1994 ctyofbuouio ITEM NO:/3 Department Approval: Name Tom Kuehn Title Finance Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administratois Report Item Description: Senior Citizen’s Deferral - Reapplication From 80-1 Sewer Project Attachment Resolution No. 2753 Adopted 1/22/90 Mr. Henry Skarp, 1045 West Femdale Road, is applying for renewal of the Senior Citizen Deferral of the saniury sewer special assessment on his property. Mr. Skarp is single and qualifies under the income and asset guidelines. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution #_ approving the reapplication of special assessment deferment for Henry M. Skaip. Ayes _. Nays _. • I L cn Y OF ORONO City of ORONO resolution of the city council NO.2753 ™.r/« IPPWWIHO A RBAPPtICATION OP SPECIAL ASSESSMENT A BESOLOTIOH POE HEHIK M. SKAEP MBEKEAS, the Sewer for which »plcin”a«e^7«e*nts Stve been levied against the benefited properties; and MBBREAS. the ^°“p®iic5*tnd'^P^tTO^^ 1093 and 1779 for oefsons 65 years of age or older who such special -fets and for whom payment of such MHEREAS, Henry «• V/i.5*t3“e%^Vnt*"r\^7nV“o the deferment of the 1^93 and 1779^, the original provisions of th® city Council January 12, 1981 with f IrbTeruenratKt %pfo%e%% the City Council on February 24, 1986. , HOM. THEEEPORE. »V’?fnd‘f®tha?“\h^"%'p7ll«^^^ *>“the City of Orono hereby finds *.he provisions of |S»onVtr^ated •, „V,'"*5'?77Tanrhe«by «de» deferral of the APPLICANT: Henry M. Skarp ADDRESS: 1045 West Ferndale Road t.FVTED AMOOMT amount DEFERR^ LEVY NO. P.1.N.S._ - - -- 7990 02-117-23 43 0024 $8,831.40 $0,831.40 ........ the deferred »»»?«"?"*• „f“thV flrs^t pay»ent due in be payable at the time of the rirsi pay interest shall year 1995. The remainder of ‘A* th*^*he adopted assessment thereafter be payable in aceoidanee witn roll. •r Cl I Y ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2753 . c is automatically terminated in il.ction''\*9« any ona^r »ore of the ISiiwlig conditions, whichever may occur first: The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible. is sold# 1. 2. 3. 4. t^sfeVr^Sr oMlvTae^d:'’" ‘ The property should lose its homestead status; or “ul'l%e*Vo ht“fh^p\o riqXife payment. Adopted by the City Council of the City of orono, Minnesota on the 22nd day of January, 199 . "xaiKos^ Grdbfldt f M^yoir Edward J. CalS^han Jr., Acting Mayor If the applicant wishes to reapply^at the en^ this fi year deferiDent# the applicant October 1994# to keep theior deferment of special aasesmsents <)ctobet^^iJ^»^. assessment from being included wit payable in 1995. Henry w. Da€e A RFSOLUTION approving a re application of SreCIAL ASSESSMENT A deferment for HENRY M. SKARP whereas , the City Council has ordered a local improvement project known as LS1980-1 Sanitary Sewer for which special assessments have been levied against the benefitted properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution Numbers 1093 ai^ 1779 establishing a policy and procedure for deferring such special assessments for persons 65 yean S^geTolde^who have limited income and assets and for whom payment of such special assessment would constitute a financial hardship; and WHEREAS, Henry M. Skarp has made reapplication for defemcnl of noted special assessment pursuam to the provisions of Resolution Numbers 1093 and 1779. the originardeferment was approved by the City Council Janua^ 12 1981 with deferment approved by the City Council on February 24, 1986 and January 22. 1990. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hercbv finds that the applicant has demonstrated a hardship consistent with the provisions of Re'solution No. 1093 and 1779. and hereby orders deferral of the payment for the levied special assessment as follows: APPLICANT: ADDRESS: LEVY NO. P I N S. 7990 02-117-23 43 0024 Henry M. Skarp 1045 West Femdale Road I FviF.n amount $8,831.40 AMOUNT $8,831.40 to 1999. Deferral of payments for principal and interest shall be for a exceed five (5) years with ihe first payment of principal and interest due i y Interest at the rate of 9 1/2% annum shall be added to the deferred asscKinent Deferred principal and interest shall be payable at the time of the first year 1999. The remainder of the principal and interest shall thereafter be paya e i with the adopted assessment roll. This right of deferment is automatically terminated in collection 1999 or upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following conditions, whichever may occur first: 1. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible. 2. The property or any part hereof is sold, transferred, or subdivided; 3. The property should lose its homestead status; or 4.If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial paymem. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 24th day of October, 1994. Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Acting Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk If the applicant wishes to reapply at the end of this five (5) year deferment, the applicant must reapply to the City of Orono for deferment of special assessments in October 1998, to keep the assessment from being included with the real estate tax due and payable in 1999. Henry M. Skarp Date % REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Octdjjy9r%W4 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title Ciiy Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrators Report Item Description: Appointment of Part-Time Police Officers At its September 26th meeting the Council approved the hiring of Neal Melton and Bill Persv.l as part-time police officers subject to successful completion of a background investigation and Dhysical and psychological examinations. Each of these has been successfully completed. It is staffs recommendation that both candidates be appointed to part-time police officer positions effective November 7, 1994. In addition, it is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resohitions which allow the city pension payraems for these ofttcers to be paid into the PERA Police and Fire Fund versus the regular PERA fund. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to appoint Neal Melton and Bill Persell to positions as part-time police officers effecuve November 7. 1994, at a pay rate of $10.92/hour; and to adopt resolutions allowmg their pensions to be paid into the PERA Police and Fire Fund. r i I A RESOLUTION TO DECLARE THAT THE part -time position held by BILL PERSELL IS THAT OF A POLICE OFFICER u/uvDir the Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund esublish eligibility for coverage in the Police and Fire ftind. xinvu TnvBFgORE BE rr RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Hennepin Colinty. Miimesou 353*^ Subdivton r.'r^*to“U.«roy«->•»- " Association Police and Fite Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Mitinesou at a regular meeting held October 24, 1994. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST. Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk A RESOLUTION TO DECLARE THAT THE PART-TIME POSITION HELD BY NEAL MELTON IS THAT OF A POLICE OmCER WHEREAS, the Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund excludes part-time police officers unless a resolution is adopted by the governing body to establish eligibility for coverage in the Police and Fire ftmd. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Hennepin County. Minnesota that effective November 7,1994. the position Neal Melton holds is that of a police officer as defined in Minnesota Statutes. Section 353.64. Subdivision 2. pursuant to which said employee shall become a member of the Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held October 24, 1994. Edward J. Callahan. Jr.. Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk request for council action D^paitment Approval: Name Dorothy Hsllin Tllk City Clerk Item DcscripCtoo: List of Licenses for Council Approval O. DATE: Oct^fe204 ITEM NO: / Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Licenses SepUc Sys.«. .nsu..- COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve license CITY OF ORONO PsCHJVED septic system installers Crystal Bay, MN 55323 C. _ AU auesdoDS must be answered. License fee. bond. Certificate of Insurance and evidence of MPCA Cerdfication must be attached. AU applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. p,..in.« Sf.PTIC ^gg»ICfi--------------------- 2. Busbys address 10 ^03. ao*^Ot.N£___y.MlCHflEl- (soeci) Business phone * 5-nfa*T (city) (2ip) Residence phone 4 H H - 3. "7 A*f Name of applicant or company reprcsentative(s) holding MPCA certification Duoncr. .6ctr4-h<>/-------------------------------------- Type of certification held: _ Installer ^Pumper Expiration date: r>gc. V m Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? __fcjjQ----------------- Most recent year ____________ 7. Have you ever had a license revoked? Where? _____________________ When? No Mo 50. OC CA rV^vv 8. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes____ . ^ ,, / I'TTv r-r "tijmin 9. Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes _vl_ No ------- :7/vAV'T OFFICE 131150(^^ »*V4. SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: 01 V edr/^ AA f • 1- »• f " HECEm-THM YOU^ 1. $50.00 License application fee. . ^ ^ 2. $2,000.00 license and permit bond nami^City of Orono as obligee. The otatc^umwr* ^q ^, Bond will not be accepted, _ _ - o^- ^ 3. $50-100-300.000 minimum Certificate of Insurance, gjp CK. 4* Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNFIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for a and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State ot Minncs and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. y^/7 _________Date - yy Applicant ’s Signamre CITY USE ONLY Sta^ recommendation: Approval Reason for denial: Denial Dae fo-n-^ City Council Action: Date Date license mailed Approved l(o COUNCIL Miri-. OCT 2 A orroFORO :^o m \ • . .• •• • * ! %*» »•, -- • •»<••.•,•. 7 v.‘:w. *• * /* ■'• * JL■*■ ‘‘ • •'* 10/09/94 PR: CB PRREGORBMP i NAME 471SM0(0 4745 0339 47«931019 471I40071 475443t<2 4O113t70 44M4300t 471503991 4»-i5/«024 475949721 4(4421014 472529007 4(47014(4 4(944(5(2 4(4420432 4(9047444 474(47412 475340151 4775004(4 475444249 4774(3477 4715(94(3 477(47279 47(020397 471444140 472500574 1212(2417 475344512 440443542 470947727 477700023 33450(241 473104424 4(4909535 47(743251 47(4((274 470700901 4(9444107 4741(7795 475342943 47374(173 473(09(29 4705((529 4(9(29194 4755(9177 2(74(7042 4725(3051 ANDERSON, BRUCE L BOBZIEN, SUE A BORIS, SCOTT H BOSMA, JAMIE L BRINKHAUS, JOHN F CALLAGHAN, JEREMIAH CARLSON, MICHAEL B CHESMICK, GARY B CORNICE, JAMES L DEMBOUSKI, JAY C ENGLISH III, IRVING ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHENICH, DAN T (SAFFRON, MICHAEL P GERHARDSON, JOHN R GOMAN, DAVID J GREGORY, JAMES D HALLIN, DOROTHY N HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING, CAROL J HASEMAN, CAROLE JOHNSON, BRADLEY P KARNITZ, RICKY D KING, ANITA D KNOLLENBERG, KRISTIN KUEHN, THOMAS M MABUSTH, JEANNE A MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E MCNICHOLS, DAVID L MILLER, CHRISTOPHER M00R8B, RONALD J MOROHCZYNSKI, JAMES OAS, DANIEL 0 OBBRAIGNER, SCOTT G OBRIEN, RANDY L OLSON, JOHN C. OMAN, LYLE B PALMER, GREGORY A PETERSON, JACK W QUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J ROSS, JOHN A SCKOBNHOFF, JOHN B SKREEN, DALE S STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD SULLIVAN, STEPHEN X THOMTON, MARK R 474((329( TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE 470704904 TOMCZYK, MARK W 475505292 VANG, BRUCE L 468629488 VEE, LINDA S 477881539 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J YTDDPT GROSS 31 39863.33 31 22156.99 31 71(2.74 12 11392.43 42 34731.73 93 3498.00 31 5457.27 31 37267.53 31 41905.09 31 38378.16 31 38202.11 31 34312.45 31 34465.85 33 31751.93 42 57361.81 35 6768.52 42 277(2.80 12 27352.51 42 25785.82 31 12680.62 12 22731.68 31 37130.06 31 3787.(7 35 1214.27 31 4280.(1 15 46711.(2 33 39763.64 93 3127.30 31 34601.06 15 12082.87 12 51828.31 31 34889.41 93 2936.07 42 25984.02 92 25898.91 15 8632.54 33 31553.48 42 25279.19 93 2708.00 92 32020.67 92 25556.15 93 3955.04 31 10316.51 42 25316.23 93 27352.52 31 44412.41 31 33(77.08 31 34879.23 31 34149.87 33 27352.52 12 24341.92 33 25301.97 CURRENTGROSS 1795.50 1159.85 1204.88 591.88 1(56.00 78.00 327.60 1774.56 1974.23 1682.17 1581.36 1611.52 1570.59 1513.93 2415.31 258.22 11(3.04 1304.16 1113.04 576.01 1062.10 2132.75 87.36 40.68 322.15 2227.20 1895.93 234.48 1788.47 1129.06 2(49.44 1(11.52 218.16 1113.04 1113.05 938.32 1513.92 1321.74 275.00 1614.50 1113.03 107.35 414.96 1113.03 1304.16 2177.28 1581.36 1581.36 1(11.52 1304.16 1071.88 1209.20 63,230.01 • f • » ». •t*COUMCXL CHBCK REGISTER Wed Oct 12 1994 00:07:33 Pag* 1 .CHICK MO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N INVOICE PO HUM.NAHUAL0317301994/10/13 $4,778.00 $4,778.00*CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNI SAVINGS W/H (. TRANSF 9999-2030 001077 IP0317311994/10/12 $9,313.82$9,313.82*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP W/H FED TAX. PICA, M 9999-2030 001078 IP0317331994/10/12 $2,883.44$2,883.44*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CITY SHARE PICA 8 ME 9999-2032 001079 IP0317331994/10/12 $38,378.82$38,378.82*FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NET PAYROLL TRANSFER 9999-2030 001078 IP0317341994/10/12 j2.788.93 $2,788.93*MINNESOTA DEFT OP REVE STATE TAXES H/H 9999-2030 001080 IP $58,120.81 CqONCIL CHBCK REGISTER Thu Oct 20 1994 23:26:59CHECK HO CHBCK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR* . . . . . ... . . . . A*1 MINNETONKA RENT P*9« XDESCRIPTIONACCOUNT 8 INVOICE PO HUM.MMlUia* .SCAFFOLDING FOR SALT 0249-4331 001995 >•^ REPAIR GOLF TRUCK 0590-4341 001992 • •OHT TBSTING-OCB ROAD BRI 0355-4305 41509 OHAPPLIANCE PICKUP 0291-4348 001979 OHHAMBURGER k ROLLS 0591-4802 6134 OH *!i DEVELOPER TRAY 0039-4232 567501 OH GOLF COURSE-SEPT 0590-4343 152917 3!CONTAINER BY LAKE-SB 0290-4343 152887 CITY HALL, PW, POLIC 0099-4343 152861 OH UPS CHARGES 0129-4232 45134 OH DARE BROCHURES 0129-4322 43996 OH LETTERHEAD k ENVELOP 0129-4210 43921 OH RESERVE BROCHURES 0129-4322 45127 OH RESERVATION BOOK 0590-4322 43995 OH ENVELOPES mo 0129-4322 46243 OH !■ NOV INSURANCE 0129-4151 1009940002984 OH NOV INSURANCE W/H 9999-2030 1009940002984 OB OCT INSURANCE 0039-4152 001974 OH OCT INSURANCE 0069-4152 00197 <OR OCT INSURANCE 0129-4152 001974 OR OCT INSURANCE 0174-4152 001974 OR OCT INSURANCE 0249-4152 001974 OR OCT INSURANCE 0549-4152 001974 OR OCT INSURANCE 0569-4152 001974 OH OCT INSURANCE 0590-4152 001974 OH OCT INSURANCE 9999-2030 001974 OK OCT INSURANCE 9001-1298 001974 OH ♦ EL LS 815,18,20,21 0569-4344 3371 OH 031728031729031730031731 031732 031733 031734 031735 031736 031737 031738 1994/10/241994/10/241994/10/241994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/74 1994/10/24 I $24.75 $24.75*1.043.991,043.99*$4,272.00$4,272.80*$30.00$30.00* $22.00 $22 08* $204.00 $204.00* $67.34 279.06 161.57 500.77* $27.00 $76.90 $380.31 $106.43 $75.16 $140.24 $694.04* $422.64 $187.68 $610.32* $21.75 $2.55 $65.36 $12.75 $21.67 $2.07 $2.58 $.85 $104.60 $2.20 $236.40* ARCA MINNESOTA INC. AUGIES MOBILE CHEF BELL k HOWELL BLACKOHIAK k SONS BLACKOWIAK k SONS BLACKOHIAK k SONS BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COLONIAL LIFE INS CO COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFE/GRP LIFB/GRP I 217.44 217.44*«l Mil f COUNCIL CHBCK REGXSTBR Thu Oct 20 CUBCK NO CHBCK DATS CHECK AMOUNT.i.1994 23:26:59VENDOR CULLIGAN P«9» 2DESCRIPTIONACCOUNT 8 INVOICE PO NUH.MANUAL.OCT,NOV SERVICE 0590-43^3 001976 OH •CYLINDER CL2 0S49-4231 D01066506 *OHSWING SEATS STREET SinNS 0290-12320249-4232 136612136550 !|OHOH8 tlDEMURRAGE CHARGE 0549-4234 20202 > ' I .“•‘I•ftOH^A/r WINDOW ENVELOPES 0069-4210 14115 FLOOR MATS FLOOR MATS STEFFENHAGEN CLOTHING k PERSONAL STREET DEPT EMPLOYEE STEFFENHAGEN RATHBUN, OUAST STREET DEPT EMPLOYEE 0099-4221 0099-4221 0590-4221 0569-4221 0249-4221 0590-4221 0569-4221 0249 4221 298838 298837 291630 295110 29S109 295108 291632 291631 • f • OH,OH- OH/08:OH' OH «*, DEER PTCKUP-BEDERWOO 0185-4360 001981 i OH'■ REPAIR TO L.S. «7 0569-4344 355546 , 8 OH‘ HOT CUPS HOT CUPS 0039-4302 0590-4382 001978 001978 o«;Ml•i» SEPT SERVICE SEPT SERVICE 0569-4306 0549-4306 4090525 409052S OH, OH* PARK LAWN SERVICE-SE 0290-4343 1178 OH- REPAIR DR 2000 TESTE 0549-4234 683623 OH'• HOMESTEAD APPLICATIO HOMESTEAD CARDS 0059-4210 0059-4210 CA9430 CA9431 <NII OH 031739031740031741031742031743 031744 031745 031746 031747 031740 031749 0317S0 031751 1994/10/241994/10/241994/10/241994/10/241994/10/241994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 6.006.00*I $12.00Jl?.00*$233.831,363.341,597.17*I5.005.00*I242.21242.21* $38.36 $38.38 $2.56 $15.10 $64.87 $2.56 $15.10 $46.23 $223.18* $50.00 $50.00* $1,637.23 $1,637.23* $111.62 $27.90 $139.52* $46.20 $69.30 $115.50* $2,048.85 $2,048.85* I215.68 215.68* $20.00 IIIO.SO $30.50* DPC INDUSTRIES INC.EARL F ANDERSON ASSC EARL F ANDERSON ASSCFEED RITE CONTROLS FORMS 6 SYSTEMS G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES G 6 K SERVICES GANGELHOFF, DONNA GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE GLBNHOOD INGLEWOOD GLENHOOD INGLEWOOD GOPHER STATE ONBCALL GOPHER STATE ONBCALL GROUNDS CREW HACH CHEMICAL CO HENN COUNTY TRBAS HENN COUNTY TREAS a C*H • •• fV t‘ 'OCOUNCIL CHECK RBGISTBR Thu Oct 20 1994 23:26:59CHBCK NO CHBCK DKTB CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT K INVOICE PO HUM.001998 p«9« >: manual' . .m031752031753031754031755 031756 031757 031758 031759 031760 031761 031762 031763 031764 031765 1994/10/241994/10/241994/10/241994/10/241994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 I $75.50$75.50*$147.50$147.50*$100.00$100.00*$34.63$34.63*$18.47na.47* 1,386.38 1,386.38* 58.72 36.90 95.62* $20.00 $20.00* $2.98 10.52 42.81 56.31* $5.32 $16.45 $21.77* :125.00 1125.00* 582.02 160.71 •$482.13 161.71 562.02 1451.72 $1,436.05* HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASU HAZARDOUS WASTE LICE HUMANE SOC OF WRIGHT C 3RD QTR SERVICES ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST- DEF COMP W/U JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY REPLACE SEAT PANEL 8JOHNSON/BRADLEY KENNBN, JAN REIMBURSE FOR LUMBER NEWSLETTER LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO PARTS FOR MOWER LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO OIL I 7,920.00 7,920.00* $36.22 $36.22* LCWG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR LONG LK FORD TRACTOR MABUSTH-JEANNE MABUSTH-JEANNE MACA MED CTR MED CTR MED CTR MED CTR MED CTR MED CTR HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH CARE CARE CARE CARE CARE CARE LYNCH PINS FOR PLOW PLUGS FOR LOADER DOOR FOR BACKHOE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEN REIMBURSE BAKERY GOO GOMAN.KING-AN.CONTRO NOV INSURANCE NOV INSURANCE CREDIT C. KNUTSON ADJUST CREDIT TAKEN- NOV INSURANCE W/H NOV INSURANCE METRO WASTE CONTROL CO SAC CHARGES-SEP 0249-4383018S-43609999-20300129-43410129-4241 0039-4322 0590-4232 0590-4220 LEHNE'S TIRE SERVICE I PICKUP UP SCRAP TIRE 0295-4348 0249-4232 0249-4232 0249-4232 0174-4381 0174-4382 0185-4356 0174 0129 0069 0129 9999 0249 4151 4151 4151 4151 2030 4151 MINN COMM PAGER RENTAL-OCT 9001-2226 0249-4320 001989001977001969001991 001980 13751 13751 9310 193885 193888 193680 001982 001982 001983 001988 001988 001988 001988 001988 001988 001997 70660010946 *1*■OH OH *. 01^ OH • li; OH OH OH !« OH OH • * OH .1« OH OH OH OH OH OH :OUNCIL;hbck no CHECK REGISTER Thu Oct 20 CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1994 23t26:59VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT it INVOICE Pag* 4PO HUM. MAMUAL1994/10/24 $13.50 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM MEDICAL OXYGEN 0129-4232 R109940657 OH1994/10/24 $18.00 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM OXYGEN 0249-4220 R109940857 OH0317((1994/10/24 $13.50$45.00*MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COM MEDICAL OXYGEN 0129-4331 R109940858 OH.1994/10/24 $74.22 MN BENEFIT ASSN NOV INSURANCE W/H 0129-4152 001994 OH0317671994/10/24 $10.16 $84.40*MN BENEFIT ASSN NOV INSURANCE W/H 9999-2030 001994 OH0317661994/10/24 $136.43$136.43*MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS AS 1994 CODE BOOKS 0129-4240 001986 OHi.031769 1994/10/24 $2,875.68$2,875.88*MN STATE TREASURER BLDG PERMIT SURCHARG 9001-2222 001996 OH. 031770 1994/10/24 $272.90 $272.90* MOTOROLA INC INSTALL RADIO IN NEW 0249-4320 W2935312 OH 1994/10/24 $6.59 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0549-4231 001973 OH 1994/10/24 $12.52 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0549-4232 001973 OH 1994/10/24 $62.76 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0249-4232 001973 OH 1994/10/24 $112.29 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0129-4241 001973 OH 1994/10/24 $93.21 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0129-4232 001973 1994/10/24 $102.28 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0249 4233 001973 OH 031771 1994/10/24 $14.73 $406.36* NAVARRE TRUE VALUE MISC PARTS 0290-4232 001973 •1 031772 1994/10/24 $187.71 $187.71* NORTHLAND BUSINESS DICTATING CASSETTES 0129-4210 6072 OH • n 1994/10/24 $622.39 NSP NSP CHARGES 0569-4324 001999 OH 1994/10/24 $22.37 NSP NSP CHARGES 0290-4324 001999 OH 031773 1994/10/24 $113.78 $758.54* NSP NSP CHARGES 0249-4324 001999 OH 031774 1994/10/24 $17.20 $17.20* O'SULLIVANS NAVARRE AU OIL CHANGE B6Z TRUCK 0174-4341 001984 OH . 031775 1994/10/24 $2,429.58 $2,429.58* ORONO SCHOOL DIST 278 JOINT RECREATION PRO 0290-4357 001990 1994/10/24 $13.75 OTTEN BROS SOD 0249-4233 87108 OH 1994/10/24 $110.00 OTTEN BROS SOD-CASCO PT 0249-4233 87102 OH 031776 1994/10/24 $166.36 $310.13* OTTEN BROS DELIVER SPRUCE TREE 0249-4346 8399 OH • • 1994/10/24 $3,495.63 PERA INS PERA 9/26 - 10/09 9999-2031 001975 OH 031777 1994/10/24 $4,590.51 $8,086.14* PERA INS PERA W/H 9/26 - lO/O 9999-2030 001975 OH .. 1 ; COUNCIL CHECK RBOZSTER Thu Oct 20 1994 23:26:59 P«9« SDESCRIPTION ACCOUNT it INVOICE PO HUH. HRMURL03177#1994/10/241994/10/241994/10/24 $109.00$60.09$26.22$217.31*PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR TOWING CHARGES WELDING, TARGET SHOO CHAIN RING FOR LOADS 0129-43410129-42410249-4232 00196500196514131 •6 OH ^OHOH0317791994/10/241994/10/241994/10/24 $19.53$$4.67$29.53$113.93*PRO TIRE $ EXHAUST PRO TIRE & EXHAUST PRO TIRE & EXHAUST OIL CHANGE (1168 OIL CHANGE, WIPERS 6 OIL CHANGE 11172 0129-43410129-43410129-4341 347236893818 OM (OHOH0317601994/10/24 $3.73$3.73*R C INDENTIFICATIOMS LAMINATE ID-WECKMAN 0174-4232 18125 OH 031761 1994/10/24 $34.73 $34.73* RICKS SUPERVALU MISC ITEMS 0590-4210 001972 •OH 1 031762 1994/10/24 $10.99 $10.99* RITZ CAMERA FILM PROCESSING 0174-4210 3764863 OH 031763 1994/10/24 $$,200.7$ $$,200.76* ROLF B ERICKSON NOVEMBER ASSESSING F 0059-4307 001971 OH 1 031764 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 $445.$S $233.31 $1,187.33 $1,8$$ .29* ROLLINS OIL CO ROLLINS OIL CO ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE PURCHASE OIL FILTERS GASOLINE PURCHASE 0590-4220 0249-4232 9001-1260 31572 86104 31573 OR OH OH 03176S 1994/10/24 $22.32 $22.32* SCHARBER b SONS INC REPAIR JOHN DEER 0590-4342 7835 OH 03176$ 1994/10/24 $150.00 $150.00* SPIAA SPIAA RETRAINING CON 0129-4356 001967 OH 031767 1994/10/24 $15.26 $15.26* ST JOSEPH EQUIPMENT PARTS FOR LOADER 0249-4232 S12376S OH 031766 1994/10/24 $50.00 $50.00* STA-SAFE LOCKSMITHS REPAIR LOCK 0129-4341 2659 OH » 031769 1994/10/24 $57.05 $57.05* SULLIVAN, STEPHEN REIMBURSE FOR ROLLS 0175-4382 001970 OH M 031790 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 1994/10/24 $5$.$0 $17.75 $44.37 $26.63 $44.37 $44.36 $234.10* U S WEST CELLULAR U S WEST CELLULAR U S WEST CELLULAR U S WEST CELLULAR U S WEST CELLULAR U S WEST CELLULAR US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES US WEST CHARGES 0549-4320 0549-4355 0069-4355 0569-4355 0129-4355 0174-4355 002000 002000 002000 002000 002000 002000 OHOHOHOHOHOH ■Ui -f. COWCXL CmCX KtGXSTBt Thu Oct 20 1954 23:26:59HOCnCK DATE CHECK MKXm VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT «INVOICE PO MUM. MMNOM^ tV0317tl1004/10/24 iflSO.OOH50.00*ULTRAMAX 9MM AMMO 0129-4241 10570 OH• 0 ^•S17f2 1004/10/24 $104.37$104.37*UNIFORMS UNLIMITED FAT BADGES 0129-4221 107956 «*;jon'•10317011004/10/24 $9$.IS $95.15*HARNING LITES OF MN BARRICADE TYPE RENTA 0249-4331 63752•11704 1004/10/24 1j f454.IOUse.10*HATERPRO PVC PIPES-CASCO PT 0249-4233 620137 OH01170$1004/10/24 $1.$1.,999.74,999.74*HAYZATA-CITY OF 2ND QTR WATER PURCHA 9672-1299 001993 0« $53,263.40 ■i. 0 t * »!♦ 4» i •I • « <* i •H .V • I. n »• ► 4 • '^r •? • V,« OOUMCIL CmCR SUMNMIY Thu Oct 20 1994 23:27:06mm •PUMO •PUKO •pom • pom • pom •001423072073074 399 GDIEItAL PUMO MUM tT AID CO/PD MTA OPBKATING PD SWR OPBAATING PD 0/C OPBAATING PD PAYROLL CLEARING $33,111.30$4,272.80$2,399.25$2,582.67$1,846.76$9,050.02$53,263.40 V Utt •!’ - . i' . INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCtmM OCT 2 4 1»94 cmroFOMNio OF I g- > -f Mn/DOT Preliminary OesiQn ofFAHTMfNT: Matro Division - Rotavilla STATE OF IMNNESOTA OATI October 10, 199A Office Memorandum TO: Policy Conrunittee Members TH 12 Corridor Study FflOM W R6in3Mf Proi#ct M®o450f (J Roseville Pre-Design pMowf: 582 - 1293 TH 12 Corridor Study Update Th« mMtino sch«»ut«l tor October 19 et the Ororto City Hell has bwn rescheduled tor November 16. ( Sorry, I have been subpoenaed into court! Project progress to date includes: The wetland Weld identification for alt of the alignments wras completed this vreek There vrill be representatives from the Mn Historical Society starting historical and archeological field work within the nest couple weeks. Field work is to bo complete by snow fall. A work order has been filled for a consultant to begin work on the hazardous waste location Identification for the EIS. The contracts for the Economic study is signed. Barton Aschman j* subconsultants on board. Kick off meeting is scheduled for the week of Oct 24. Traffic Forecasting is well underway. Regional model has been modified to subdivide zones arnl socio economic and employment data are final. Roadway geometries are being further refined to minimize known Impacts and provide more detail at intersections aruJ connections. of the selection criteria in the Draft EIS. STATE OF MINNESOTAOffice Memorandum the Orono City Hall has been rescheduled ubpoenaed into court) Project progress to Feel free to contact me at your convenience if you have any questions. The next Policy Committee Meeting wilt be held on November 16,1994 at the new Orono City Offices, ttfne is 5:30 p.m. Committee Members Dwight Poss Bob Beumen Marvin Johnson Tod Olson Marion Alger Ann Thies Ed Callahan Robert Gisvold Vern Genziinger Michael Mathison John Russek Kay Gabriel Sam Rettinger Barry Petit Dick Harmon J. Diann Goetten Ken Nielson f the alignments was completed this week. i4n Historical Society starting historical and lext couple weeks. Field work is to be nsultant to begin work on the hazardous S. y is signed. Barton Aschman is getting iting is scheduled for the week of Oct 24. . Regional model has been modified to nd employment data are final. r refined to minimize known impacts and d connections. ive started that section of the draft. I am d' and the 'floodplains' section. Staff is egetation and farmland impacts sections. ( out from FHWA. All major investments cceed 1 mile of new road) are now subject s part of scoping or in our case will be part % >. 1 unk Highway 12 Policy Co«*ittaa Mooting Projoct Discussion August 17 5:30 Orono City Hall Attondoos Jis Jo nson Vorn Gonxlingor Cd Callahan Val Roinaas Harv Johnson Jack Russok Dwight Poss ToB O'Roofa Dob Bauaan Dick Harson San Rottingor Hodina Horn Co orono MnDOT indopondonco Hright Co Dolano MnDOT Franklin Twshp Maysata Long Lako Piojoct Updato - Valorio Roinaas EIS updato , ^Hotland Idontification : m l.t. .Uly and will bo coaplotod this fall. Lci?oS. EIS «m in octobr. H.t.r »j.uty ^ ^ * Draft soction for EIS has boon startod. Tosrxng on^» no°w»usual wator contaainants or PCB's in sodiBonts for tho araa. ,.r-l.ndj-p.ct.^rki.^ on loe.tlng .9 prosorv.. and prl- farmland. Traffic rorocasts traffic forocasting. Barton r^iiar/otr b. IS95. Twonty yaar forecast will bo 2015. FY 94. Add'l funds will beEconomic Study * Partial?/ funded in reouested in FY 95 * Contract went out for bids in February. Consultant has been selected and approved. Contracts have been signed and were delivered on October 3* Barton Aschman was the consultant selected, they are now working on getting the subconsultant contracts finalized. * Work will start the week of October 24. For information gathering Barton Aschman will be conducting a telephone survey in late fall. * Proceeding with Study - the group decided that starting with the Long Lake/ Orono area was most prudent Hazardous Waste -ii* We have started background research. A consultant will be hired to complete. Nova is consultant selected. Work order has been submitted, we are waiting for signatures to proceed. Archeological/ Historical „ ^ i..*. Mn* Phase I reconnaissance was started last fall* nn Historical Society is being brought back on board to complete this fall. Study is quite extensive. Is on line to be completed by January, more field work will be conducted through October and November. * Mayor Johnson made a request that the EIS be available for review in parts as it is completed. This is our intent fw For formal DEIS publication, full document will be distributed with an established comment period. Layouts^^^^^ has filled a position to help with the layout work for the project. In areas where available, we will digitize aerial photos into the CADD system so producing copies will be less time intense. * Maps for each city were distributed earlier in the year, the comments have been incorporated in to the maps but due to a lack of available resources, maps will not be redistributed until we have the entire area on the computer system. . ^ ^ * A problem area still exists at CR 6 and TH 12. The location of the RR tracks and Baker Park lend some difficulties to designing an interchange in this area. Discussion of Other Projects «.kaThere are several projects that are currently in t works at various stages. . ^ ^ .CR 6 upgrade by Hennepin County through Or<wo and Independence. This project will be split into three phases and begin within the next couple years. Contact for questions is Hennepin County. “Sr,‘*V “mhSS? Destrier” • in" Contact is Dave Solsrud. Channelization project in Long Lake and Signal at WillSw Drive. Final Design done by Metro Design in Golden valley. Contact is Glenn Ellis. Construction to start in early 95. Mediation «,«ting8. Last Bediation session was June 21. Mo Tftooting® schodulod at this tins. system ^ inprovements to Watertown Road are only one small^rt of a system planning concept. Inprovements to Watertown Road do not include upgrade to a 4-lane. Sanwrtation system planning also includes improvements to existing TH 12 as well as new features such as signal coordination, restricted access, and incentives to promote park and pool. commissioner/Governor Letters to West Central Tribune rilttVr points to a possibility of a shortar project timeline. There are several barriers to meeting the date of 1999/2000 in the letter. Completion of possible litigation and funding. The Governor ^s set up a commission to address funding metro. It will address the possibilities of a funding source. Background for the commission was sent, .o all policy committee members. Also sent were oopie-^ o the newspaper article and the responses published. comments asked how the comments from the f ir^ ?SSnd'o^ discussion on the ^our lane proposals would^^ incorporated into the plans. At this ti timenew cooies for all the cities, it is very time intsnse. We"ars now working on getting ths project area onto the CADD systen and the changes will *>•“»*** **‘“*; Kew maps will toe made after this process. For the Bost part all of the coBBents have teen addressed but m still have difficulties at the location of TH 12 and CR 6 for an interchange. The City of Delano had a willreconstruction of the curve at TH 12 and CT 30. i wiii do some research and set up a Wright Co. and the City of Delano to resolve. A resident fore the City of Orono had a regarding the designation of Watertown could be reclassified as soeething other than a collator Thm citv Of Orono will have to maxe aS^teitents to COBP plan if this is what they feel is appropriate. The City of Independence had a question on how the EIS the L and La aliqnnents. Since the Scopinq Document identified L as the south bypass, this segment will be addressed in the Draft EIS, if a south bypass is selected the Final EIS will address the La alignment and L alignment to identify justification for substitution. Other Questions:Discussion on role of Governors co^ission. Identify funding for mega projects Questions on the construction schedule. Still 10 years out, contingent on funding What is the right of way acquisition process? Depends on property type. For residential, appraisal, offer, possible condemnation depending on ability to settle Wha^ comas after the EIS in the studies. Public hearings. Final EIS, record of decision, final design, right of way, construction IF a tunnel is to be located on Watertown Rd, where will *^*Near the existing crossing of the Luce Line and the railroad can MnDOT acquire Parkland?Yes, but mitigation is required and is sometimes very difficult# More questions on how Watertown Road fits into the TSM alternative. . . ._It is one element of a comprehensive system. How does CR 84 fit into the TSM alternative? It serves as a link in the system plan. What does MnDOT do with excess Right of Way? It is often used as ponding areas for sedimentation. It can also be used for a variety of mitigation purposed or can be Put up for sale. Can MnDOT guarantee that Waterto%m Rd will remain a two MnDOT will not have jurisdictional authority over Watertown Rd. The Cities of Orono and I^ng Lake are the governing bodies for this road and as such are the authority for designating its purpose and use, consistent with the comprehensive plan and Met Council guidelines. Next Meeting - October 19, 1994 CANCELED Adjournment The Association of Metiopoiitan Municipalities .n— ** oci n 199* T Legislative Policy Adoption Meeting Thursday, November 3,1994 iiouf ............................5j30*6 i30 p.iTT. (cosh bor) Buffet ttyl# dlnn#r....................^:30 p.m. ($25) Roost Round of Beef Chicken Breost Boked Horn Butineii meeting ...................7:30 p.m. Royol Cliff Conference Center 2280 CRff Rood Eogon. Minnesoto 55122 Spouses, significant others and guests welcome O In keeping yrtthlCBtysarideciBlon to concenhofe on ipeoker or panel cSK^JSSion. TNi vM alow more lime to dsciss 1996 AMM teQMaH y Octobers O AMMpolcyo(topHonlsirwkev8toftoforour1995legWcir^ cities to send more than one represertotive to contribute to the dheiissio«» O PkKeDinnerlewyoMom ($25perpecson)w>rithCofOlVVIIiami(W3»l)wto^^ noon. Oct. S h Please chonnel ol reservations through your AdfTTlnistrator. Your cityvrWbebBled after the event. checks moy be mode payable to AMM. City officials attending the 7.30 p. meeting only do not need reservations. A...»l.llon.ll««ioprtto»MMnlelp»iniM.»4«0l«liiglM>*««» North *•’» r Business agenda e • mm * i • • ; 1. Cal to order 2* Welcoone CMoyw Trw Eop*'* a’AdopttoooflwU^ i EdObWirnerit of IW AI^ legislative prto^ OliQUBlon of Uiboi^ StrotegletTosk Force report 6. New business 7. Adjournment Royal Cliff Conference Center 2280 cnff Rood Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Cliff Road 1*94 494 Cedar Ave. Bom Mi: Go west on Cl« Rood and b located Just behind the Super America. Fiom MW: Go Eod on Clff Rood ^tum rigM Avenue. There Is a Super America on the right. Take me after Super America. V - • - 4 g«nda » or Tom Egon. Eagan) " ' ■» UgWoNva Polcy Program now AMM itgwanvo pnorifiM bon Stfotogloi Task Forco ropoft ice Center cross Cedar Avenue. Just pas* lea on the left. Turn left the Super America. Royal CBff lea. turn right just before Ce^ I the right. Take the first right I men^ber Mayon, Cound fAdmhlstraton.^ REGIONAL BLUEPRINT St Piul. MN SSm f i:» Tl>P iwi St Peul.MN Permit No 702B it tOMALD MOORSE AOMINISTIATOR CITY Of OAORO 10 66 CRYSTAL BAY HR SS5230066 4A92 0 Hecyc ed paper Contains ar ’east post consumer erasie ^ ^blueprint Aoomo, ACTION PHASE BEGINS With the adoptkm of the Regional Bk/ephnt by the Metropolitan Cmmdl on Sept. 22, the hard work begins The new chatenge for the Council is to develop programs and effective partnerships with individuals and organizations around the region to work toward a more livable Twin Cities area by acting on the BIjaprint directives. is currently working to le Blueprint directions into JRRk Piagrav, identifying lips to be (BNe^pr exparrded. and pursuing existing^ progams that support the Blueprint. |A FRAMEVVORK FOR ACTION The Blueprint lays out an ambitious agenda of action to be carried out by the Council, other governmental units, private and nonprofit organizations, the business and education communities and many others. The strategies of the Blueprint cover a broad front; Strengthen the regional econemy by boosting economic growth, international competitiveness and job creation. Foster reinvestment in distressed areas, to produce new jobs and tax base, rehabilitation of dilapidated housing, and attractive amenities. Create stronger communities, with a sense of place, "neighborhood" and connection to the region as a whole. Preserve the natural environment as the region grows. Set directions for orderly growth, supported with cost<effective regional services Expand affordable housing ch^ce, especially for people with lower incomes, and life*cycle housing opportunities for all people at various stages of life In the Blueprint, the Council moves' beyond its traditional role of regkNMl systems planning and fiscal management to address complex economic and societal issues. It draws on the Council's new responsibilities for operating vital regional services for transit and wastewater treatment, and coordinating those services more effectively with regional planning ^nd aftordable housing services. As^ Meds of the region change, the S/ue^inf will be refined, but will follow thes^bgiorral directions; Position the r^ion to compela in the gloRpI msrketpisce by encoirnging economic growth, increased productivity and job croton. The region needs a strong ecoi6my to compete effectively in die international marketplace md improve our standard of livina Economic growth requires stronf public foundations, including ^ supportive business climate,* infrastructure that meets business needs and a well-trained work force that is I I ISuccessful local economic development efforts need to encourage the growth of local ■ businesses and retain existing * businesses ■ Actions: • Lead a collaborative, metro-wkle effort to develop a regioi economic strategy # I vide 3hal October ItM • Analyze and report regionai economic growth and monitor progress toward economic goals. • Examine current and future needs for high-quality regional infrastructure to meet economic and techni • Cl with initiate . v\/ educa skills • W climat public •] I «,<.ii.v. A reinvattaMiit Mi dltlreM«d^||^.? areas of ttw region, with a ' ' focus on supporting and Improving local busMisss and restoring confidsnes Mi neighborhoods. The strength of the region as a whole depends on the vitality of all its parts. Distressed areas in the central cities and other older areas of the region need to be economically and physically '*>-> rcvitallzed-attracti.ng new business development and expanding the tax base by reducing barriers to redevelopment Neighborhoods facing decline require bolstering to renew confidence in them as good places for people to live, raise children and invest in a home or business. Jobs, affordable housing and transportation need to be linked together. These links would open up access to new jobs where lower-income people live, more affordable housing where new jobs are located, better transportation to REGIONAL BLUEPRINT r • /Rirorr t^R.DMR OP RUN 10/12/94 MHITS ISSIED/FEES CCHi£C7m}SEFTOeOt 1994 \\PIRMIT TYPE•ulldina SOL PRMILT-NEM tP'ADO/RBMOOBL •P-ACC STRUCTUREO/PRXNCIPRL COM-m/RBMODBL laST-ACC STRUCT SP-UMD ALT PLIUI RBVIBN ONLY D0IO« ACCESSORY ACC/OARAOBS Sub-total Noehanical HIATIIIO SYSTEMS NOOO STOVB/PLUB PXnPLACB OAS LXNE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Pluabino PXXTURES HATER METER Sub-total Savor A Natar 8BIIBR CONNECTION NEN ssmc SYSTB ORMPLO i/C« TANK •AC ONLY Sidb-total SianTEMPORARY Sub-total Uaar Dafinad LAND ALTERATION TREE REMOVAL LAMM SPRINKLER Sub-total Orand-total QTY4254€J120105 46* PERMIT IS»3iiD REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAQE: 1REQUESTER: CAROLt-- CURRENT RANGE - 09/01/94 - 09/30/94 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 09/01/93 - 09/30/93BASE FEE831516809091008115300017750505000000000000000 14,252.50* VALUATION2,420.275.00374.160.00111.700.00 0.005.600.009.800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00136.544.00 3,058,079.00* PLAN REVIEW5,298.49 1.647.10 568.43 0.00 52.65 99.45 0.00 1,211.03 0.00 765.06 9,643.11* QTY BASE FEECdWCILMlili2 130PCT ? 4drroFOMii QO006 43* yn130.00.00 .00 00 00 001,106.50 13,919.50* VALUATION1,178,500.00828.636.00 44,000.000.003,308.000.0010,245.000.000.00154.700.00 2,219,389.00*PLAN REVXEM3,749.B7 3,479.1C 292.SO 0.00 0.00 0.00 •1.90 0.00 0.00 <70.40 •,273.91* 8 n 817.75 0 00 64,270.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 1 618.75 35.00 47,800.00 2,400.00 0.00 0.00 V 1 2 0 W 0 W W 35.00 70.00 0 00 550.00 850.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0 1 266.25 0.00 112.5C 18,775.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A A 3 14* 112.50 1,035.25* 4,600.00 70,270.00* 0 - 00 0.00* 3 15* 105.00 1,137.50* 3,000.00 00,975.00* 0.00 0.00* 13 0 13* 1,206.25 0.00 1,206.25* 66,299.60 0.00 66,299.60* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 10 2 12* 916.44 470.00 1,386.44* 67,915.00 0.00 67,915.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 11 7 1 4 23* 385.00 700.00 50.00 3,200.00 4,335.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~ n .0* 3 2 5 1 11* 105.00 200.00 250.00 750.00 1,305.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 1 !• 30.00 30.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0 0* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 1 0 1 2* 75.00 0.00 35.00 110.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 2 1 0 3* 100.00 30.00 0.00 130.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 99*s 20,969.00**3,194,640.60**9,643.11**84**17,078.44**2,368,279.00**0.271.91** BMI PBB USER 1,875.00 REPORT TOTAL 1,875.00 PUUI REVIEW 0.00 0.00 8URCMRRGB 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.00 0.00 SAC Ooo0.00 INVBSTZOATZON 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 1,075.00 1,875.00 PERMIT NDR ID NUMBER COMPANYOR-006369 00000000OR-006428 14750918 BRUCE BREN HOMESOR-006433 14445353 YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION COOR-006441 00000000OR-006466 00000000OR-0063S9 14725715 THE CARPENTERS CONST COOR-006411 00000000OR-006443 19358482 L CRAMER COOR-006398 16450331 SUSSEL CORPORATIONOR-006450 14744165 WALDENWOODOR-006457 00000000OR-006480 00000000OR-006481 00000000OR-006385 00000000OR-00641S 14726819 JOHN TOBIASOR-008444 14766567 STEVEN WIRTJESOR-006473 18236030 QUALITY CRAFTSMENOR-006475 00000000OR-006432 00000000 OR-006418 15807711 FINAZZO JOHNOR-006463 00000000 OR-006464 00000000 OR-006472 15539369 A-1 HANDYMAN OF PLYMOUTHOR-006471 00000000 OR-006390 17216628 PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTAOR-006401 14710840 NORSE EXTERIORSOR-OOG438 00000000 OR-006440 17227129 GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING COOR-006447 00000000 OR-006484 14749263 BRUCE KOBHNBN BLDROR-006485 14733397 PLYMOUTH ROOFINGOR-006367 00000000 OR-0064U2 00000000 OR-006419 00000000 OR-006430 14445353 YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION COOR-006442 00"'00000 OR-C06436 oruooooo OR-006405 oooooooo OR-006435 00000000 OR-006332 15531417 RSI RESTORATION SERVICESOR-006391 19223597 BLUE MAPLE CONTRACTINGOR-006421 14742376 PATRICK KANILY k ASSOC INCOR-006448 15531417 RSI RESTORATION SERVICESOR-006465 16824477 KIERNAN TIMOR-006461 15939186 STONEHENGE CONSTRUCTIONOR-006462 OOOOOOOO OR-006327 34789556 DITTER INC OR-006352 ■'1730450 TRIPLE D HTG k ACOR-006388 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMSOR-006399 54734361 JOHNSON JERRY EXC OR-006406 34760351 SUNBURST HEATING k ACOR-006407 34461299 COUNTRYSIDE HT<; k COOLING ij 01 2677 CASCO POINT RD012006SUGARWOOD DR017006TH AVE N012760SHADYWOOD RD051510NORTH ARM DR191000OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD24450ORONO ORCHARD RD S1C14CLi014030ELM ST012677CASCO POINT RD012240ABINGDON HAY011025TONKAHA RD012605KELLY AVE011725BOHNS PT RD012195PROSPECT AVE011003COX FARM RD011025TONKAHA RD 02 1390 PARK DR 03 2006 SUGARHOOD DR03475CNORTH SHORE DR 20 3745 SHORELINE DR24650NORTH ARM DR 4C 14C 1 13 2380 HAYZATA BLVD C 1C '•H 01 550 LONG LAKE RD E 01 315 CRBSTVIEH AVE 01 356 HBSTLAKE ST01222BBDBRHOOD DR 01 364 HBSTLAKE ST 01 290 HOODHILL RD 01 165 BBDBRHOOD DR 01 3362 BAYSIDB RD 01 220 CYGNBT PL 01 960 COX FARM RD 01 2600 COUNTRYSIDE DR H01220CYGNET PL 01 135 CYGNBT PL 01 575 OXFORD RD 01 3560 BAYSIDE RD 01 290 CRBSTVIEH AVE 01 135 CYGNET PL 01 1725 BOHNS PT RD 01 1467 SHORELINE DR 01 1090 COX FARM RD 01 3382 BAYSIDB RD 01 625 SPRING HILL RD 01 1700 SHORELINE DR ?3C 23C UO 01 4030 ELM ST 2j 1570 6TH AVE N 2C 2C lOOC OWNER LAST NM VALUATIONNOLAN 2,SOO.OOSIFORD30,000.00MAXFIELD1,950.00JAMES1,700.00.00TAYLOR.00PETERSON15.000.00PUGH400.00THOMSON93,000.00MEERKINS14,000.00EDIN 10,000.00PLAISTED.00ANDERSON.00MUELLER.00PASCH.00GARRETT35,344.00CROSBY600.00BREN.00LABATIQUE5,000.00PRESLER1,500.00TERP.003.400.002.300.00KUNZ4,640.00LIND5,680.00 ADDISON .00 .00 MARPIELD 20,000.00 HOHN .00 .00 EIDEN .00 MCDERMOTT 3,500.00 HOHN .00 ANDERSON .00 LANG 6,900.00 HANNING 13,000.00 600.00BRAUCHLE32,500.00 HALE .00 BALGAARD .00 CLAPP .00 ANDERSON .00 BUCEY 9,000.00 TAYLOR .00 HAWN 400,000.00 1,000.00 DAYTON .00 STODDARD 3,000.00 ERICKSON 2,500.00 DAYTON 1,000,000.00 3.200.00 7.500.00 5.600.00 ROSCOB .00 11 oooooooo0129332521111722-712901OOOOOOOO16OOOOOOOO021935648205147665670154461495015644446911OOOOOOOO291553141723OOOOOOOO0414744165243929676701394142110134461449013470245213OOOOOOOO04OOOOOOOO242470120801273893540229319676301593918630or 0000006OOOOOOOO06oooooooo291682447701oooooooo 01 54461495 03 24725920 01 29383589 07 oooooooo 06 15539369 05 18236030 01 54287393 05 OOOOOOOO 01 29337200 01 29332521 01 38900758 04 OOOOOOOO 04 OOOOOOOO ''I 54461495 05 OOOOOOOO 11 14749263 11 14733397 01 /c» 29332521 01 Residence 2402Addition2503Garage/Attached 2604Garage/Detached 2705Porch2806Deck2907Fence3008Gazebo3109Pool3210Re-aide 3311Re-roof 3412Tennis Court13Sign14Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Rasidanea Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovata/Remodal Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal LOCAL DSB CODES 9999 Undefined FONTS tSSXJED/FESS COLUCTED SEPIfMBER 1994•{trOKT HBR.ATI OP KUN 10/03/94 •* PERMIT Pbtr' REPORT •• CITY OF ORONO FROM 09/01/94 TO 09/30/94 RgPORT MBR. BPinPTI-1 DATE or RUN 10/03/94 • •••*PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY '^F ORONO FROM 09/01/'- TO 09/30/94 • •••• REPORT TOTAL RMB PBB PLAN RBVIEM SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT 20,969.00 9,643.11 1,531.72 0.*00 MAIL IN VARIANCE FEE (AFTER THE FACT) PERMIT TOTAL 800.00 277.00 0.00 13.50 175.00 33,409.33 "''PAflEt REQUESTER: LIE PAOBi REQOESTBRt LXM BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER k WATER USER SIGN PIRE ;giSB PEE 14,252.50 1,015.25 1,206.25 4,315.00 110.00 10.00 •o.to i. t>LAM REVIEW 9.641.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 e.so jlURCHARGE1,451.04 16.11 14.15 9.50 0.50 0.00 o.soLie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 •j lAC 800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ai [■VBSTXGATION 277.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 4% OBPOSlT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 •? 4AXL IN /ARXAIICB PER (APTBR THE FACT)175.00 6.00 7.50 ) 0.00 ' PERMIT TOTAL 26,598.65 1,077.50 ".,240.10 4,344.50 110.50 30.00 4 » ' I"T*Mt Of RUN 10/12/iN d^tyl!CT TYPE HBIfEuil4iM ML PMaLY uoftn-mw iP-JkDO/KmoOBL SP-ECC ETRUCTURB O0ir/PRX«CZPAL CaN-4D0/RBM0DBL IWT-BDD/RBHODBL IMT*ACC STRUCT sr-LMB ALT IMT-LAliD ALT PLAM RBVIBW only OM^ACCBSSORY A^OARAGBS Sub-total Mochaalcal OTY2111€2221060 4 3 0 0 1 1 19 258* :ts issued /fees cou ^cted••••• PERMIT ISooRD REPORT CITY OF ORONO YEAR-TCK)ATE PAOBi I RBQUB3TBR: CAROLS-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/94 - 09/30/94 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/93 - 09/30/93BASE FEE41.4051521.5252.6485605580 1.142 360 0 0 0 30 2.901 71.345 .00,00.50.00.00.00.00 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00* VALUATION10.045.495.00500.002.259.781.80259.800.00 0 0042.900.00 0.00 128.740.00 29.800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 322.148.00 13,089.164.80* PLAN REVIEW FEE27,043.0 .10.419 . 1.612 , 0 . 134 . 0 . 322 . 234 . 0 . 0 1.211 0 2.026 43.004 34 00 .56 .66 .00 .55 . 00 .08 .00 .00 .00 . 93 . 00 .06 . 18* OLMEIRLofit a 4167 42.480.50OnOFMMUiS41 3 1 1 1 1 13 13 260* 234.00 30.00 2,477.00 330.00 124 .00 0.00 0.00 455.00 2,894.50 81,120.00* VALUATION4,122,124.000.008,458,795.44248,*'15.00 0.0012.308.00 0.00 520.400.00 37,000.00 10.245.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 440.400.00 15,870,387.44* PLAN Rmn18,591023.1791.7180III0 1.188 114 81 0 984 0 1.812 48.074 Of.04.78.49.00.It.00 .20.to .00 .00 .41 .00 .CO .21* HRRrXflO SYSTEMS 61 5.624.80 430.212.64 0.00 57 8.727.85 601,168.00 0.00 Alt OONDITIONINQ 7 265.08 14.661.00 0.00 10 474.31 31,365.00 0.00 WOOD tTOVB/PLUE 3 151.25 10.200.00 0.00 2 65.00 3,400.00 0.00 PUtfLACt 23 1,315.00 85.039.16 0.00 37 1.821.54 101,787.16 0.00 WnLATIOM 1 35.00 1.150.00 0.00 2 70.00 3,000.00 0.00 FOIL OTORAOB 1 35.00 2.000.00 0.00 1 639.11 51,129.00 0.00 OAf LXNI INSPECT 9 315.00 6.365.00 0.00 5 165.00 1,000.00 0.00 DOCT WORK ONLY 5 202.50 8.535.00 0.00 9 390.00 17,452.00 0.00 RRMOVl OIL TANK 14 506.25 15.950.00 0.00 6 487.50 30,350.00 0.00 UMMflMBD 2 499.56 39.925.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,900.00 0.00 Sub'total 126*8.949.44*614.038.00*0.00*130*12.875.31*842,551.16*0.00* Pluoblno PtnORlI 96 7,214.17 474.136.69 0.00 98 9,746.54 646,272.55 0.00 NAfflR MITER 10 1,834.00 0.00 0.00 8 1,826.00 0.00 0.00 RIPLACI METER 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00umriNBo00.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 950.00 0.00 Sub*total 106*9.048.17*474.136.69*0.00*109*11.642.54*647,222.Sr*0.00* Sawar 4 Hater Spm CONNECTION NAttR CONNECTION 29 1,015.00 0.00 0.00 47 1.634.50 0.00 0.00 7 245.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 MM IBPTIC SYSTB 29 2,900.00 0.00 0.00 7 700 00 0.00 0.00 ORMPLO 4/OR TANK 3 200.00 0.00 0.00 8 400.00 0.00 0.00 SAC ONLY 21 15.200.00 0.00 0.00 42 27,000.00 0.00 0.00 Snmt 4 NATBK 4 280.00 0.00 0.00 5 350.00 0.00 0.00 Tub-total 93*19.840.00*0.00*0.00*111*30,154.50*0.00*0.00* Sim permanent /POSTED 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,200.00 0.00 PRR./PREB STANDG 1 39 .00 1,200.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 TBIfORARY 3 90.00 0.00 0.00 4 125.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 6*199.00*1.200.00*0.00*5*160.00*1,200.00*0.00* Pira LANN SPRINKLER 0 0.00 0 . uo U . 00 6 280.00 0.00 0.00 ufgrr mbr. bprmtiss-iMTB OP RUN 10/12/94 PEPMITS Ii:SUED/FEES PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO YiiAK-’lXHMI'l::-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/94 - 09/30/94PBRHXT TYPB Sub*totalUoor Dofinod UIND JiLTBRATIC^Tin inovALRRMNING MALLS LMM SPRINKLER Sub*totalQrand-total QTY0*8421125*S14**BASE FEE 0.00*475.00120.00 89.00385.001,049.00*VALUATION 0.00*0.00 0.00 4,500.00 0.004,500.00*110,450.41** 14,1S3,039.49**PLAN REVIEW 0.00*0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*43,004.18**PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/93 - 09/30/93 PAGti aRIQUIlTtli CMMAf».......................-i’q TY8*921012*435»*BASE FEB 280.00*500.00 (0.00117.00 0.00477.00*VALUATION0.00*0.00 0.00 9,700.00 0.009,700.00*PLAN imw• .••80134,909.35** 17,371,041.15**•••V4«.o74.a;^**• i * V ^ c‘•5 \ «. f ^ « { i I < RirorrDRTI OP RUN 10/03/94 PEFHITS ISSIED/FEES COUJCTED••••• PERMIT Fhc REPORT •• CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/94 TO 09/30/94 YEAR-TD-OMEBUILDINGMECHANICALPLUMBINGSEWER k WATERIMI PEE 71,345.00 8,949.44 9,048.17 19,840.00PLAH tlVlBN 43,004.10 0.00 0.00 0.00MflCMMGB4,441.79 311.77 242.37 34.00UC. SEARCH PEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 3,200.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 XKVISTIGATIOII 1,049.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OlfOSXT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NAIL IM 92.75 49.50 3.00 anZMURXIIG PEES 187.25 8TAPP PEES »IAZL IM PEE VASXAMCE PEE 'APTIE THE PACT)175.00 1.50 120.00 PtENZT TOTAL 124,054.97 9,353.94 9,341.54 24,186.25 IMMT MBE. BPEBRPT2-1 lATI OP ROM 10/03/94 CITY OF FROM 01/01/94 REPORT ...w. ORONO TO 09/30/94 UM PEE REPORT TOTAL no,450.41 •urn EIVIBM 43,004.18 tORCaAEGB 7,058.18 .IC. SEARCH FEB 0.00 JAC 7.200.00 (HVISTXOATXON 1,849.00 JCtOfZT 0.00 4AIL ZM 149.75 mOZMISRZNG PEES 187.25 JTAPP PEES 120.00 4AIL ZM PEE 1.50 VAEZAMCE PEE (APTEE THE PACT)175.00 PERMIT TOTAL 170,215.47 PAGli RSQUBSTIR: LX«USER 1,049.00 0.00 4.250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 SIGN199.000.000.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PittO.ON0.000.000.00 0.00 0.00 1,079.75 199.00 0.00 OMNI IRBOUliTIRs LIN /■ltO«T H»R. v.<(MTXS8-l Mil OP KUM 10/03/94QC FOMTES ISS(JB>/FEES CGUfiCTED. . . PERMIT ISfeoED REPORTCITY OF ORONO YEAR-TODKn:o IV-IRBQUSSmx LM-- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/94 - 09/30/94 -- PRBVICXJS RANGE - 01/01/93 - 09/30/93 * 4PBRMXT TYPB QTY EASE PEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEN QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN Ufxn.OMr 0«fin«d •OBOtVlSXON 12 9,275.00 0.00 0.00 13 4,880.00 0.00 To.ab'VMtIMICB 42 8,325.00 0.00 0,00 52 9,775,00 0.00 0.00CUP132,200.00 0.00 0.00 14 2,600.00 0.00 0.008RBTCN PLAN 3 400.00 0.00 0.00 3 850.00 0.00 0.00VANIJIHCB/CUP 5 800.00 0.00 0.00 1 250.00 0.00 0.00VACATIOM00.00 0.00 0.00 5 975.00 0.00 0.00APPEAL1100.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00OORP PLAN AMEND 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 Bub-total 74 •21,300.00*0.00* 0.00*89*19,580.00*0.00*0.00* Orond-total 21,300.00**0.00»»0.00**89*»19,580.00«*o.oo** e.eet* RtPORT NBR. u.diBRPTS-l own OP RUN 10/03/94 •* PERMIT Pbc REPORT •• CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/94 TO 09/30/94 BABB PBB USER 21,300.00 REPORT TOTAL 21,300.00 PLAN RBVXBN 0.00 0.00 BURCHARQB 0.00 0.00 Lie. BBARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 BAC 0.00 0.00 XHVBBTXOATXON 0.00 0.00 OBPOBXT 0.00 0.00 PBRMXT TOTAL 21,300.00 21,300.00 PAOti RBgUtSTIRi LXH i 199S HCA» Of CONTUCT CITIISJanuaryf§bnmy March April nay Juna July AufUit SaptaaPar OctaPar 9m Decfita1 TTO faialas^im ^w4 •42.75HVt ItViM 0.00 0.00 44.00 0.00 332.K)1U.99 277.25 0.00 40.f5ImpKtlam14S.00 14S.00 10.00 105.00 75.00 00.00 149.00 90.00 40.00 •M.tl••tairwr 29.00 ».00 29.00 25.00 25.00 29.00 29.CO 29.00 25.00 m.mTOTM.IfO.OQ 1W.00 101.00 130.00 432.10 299.95 447.29 119.00 125.55 2.012.75■a. flan tavlana 0 0 1 0 2 2 2 0 1 • ■o. Inapactlona 11 11 2 7 5 4 11 4 4 41 Ninnatanka Nack 2.51f.0tflan Ravla«127.09 0.00 174.40 •73.03 351.00 0.00 274.29 911.90 0.00 Inapactiana 149.00 0.00 90.00 240.00 145.00 190.00 149.00 210.00 120.00 1.M5.M ■atainar 29.00 s.oo 29.00 25.00 25.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 25.00 IB.tl TOTAl 917.fJ 25.00 291.48 1.130.03 541.00 179.00 444.29 740.90 145.00 4.04f.t* •a. flan Ravlawa 1 0 3 3 0 4 1 0 11 Na. inapactiana 11 0 4 14 11 10 11 14 ••r 707.fl 2W.08 191.24 1,240.91 971.n 911.90 4,001 a» MCWCNT Craig n. Rapp BroatiVn Rark OawtdMChMa JackOanzar ConagaOro«w Tom Egan Eagan Ray Parley St Pau! Mwia Grimm St Paul Coral Houla Bloominglan Susan Hoyt FatoonHaigMi Jairy Unha MourtOtVlaw Joan Lynch Shahopaa Garald Ottan Maw Hopa Jim Protsar Riennaht Fitary Raymond Daapnavan Kirk Schnilkar Champlln Charlons Shovar BurnsviUa William Ttiompaon Coon Rapids Elwyn TInklanbarg Btama mur OCT 19 WM •• k I :. V ♦ •• October 17. 1994 TO; FROM Managers/Adnunistrators M«tcRoger Petersoi tor of Legislative Affairs RE:Changes to proposed 1993 Legislative Policies and Priorities packet The Board of Directors at its October 13. 1994 meeting made policy change recommendations for membership consideration as indicated below. Please make copies of Ihese changes for your Mayor and Council Members.Previously mailed policy with these changes will be considered at the AMM Policy Adoption Meeting November 3, 1994 at the Royal Cliff Banquet Facility in Eagan. If you have any questions, please contact either Vcm Peterson or Roger Peterson at 490-3301. 1. m-A-6 Metropolitan Housing Policy (pages 19 and 20) Policy statement (Q 2) describing possible funding sources for the metropolitan enterprise fund on page 20 was deleted in its entirety and (Q 3) renumbered to (Q 2) and amended to read as follows: "The Revenue Sources for this enterprise fund should consist of a combination of state general fund appropriation and metropolitan raised revenue. If the 1995 Legislature docs meve forward with the metropolitan enterprise fund concept, the AMM Board will recommend a preferred regional funding source (s)." 2. III-B-6 Other Development tools (page 28 and 29) The first bold face type policy statement dealing with propciTy tax abatements was deleted. 3. lV-H-4 (should be IV-G-4) WATER TESTING CONNECTION FEE (page 41 and 42) The first sentence of the background section on top of page 42 should read as follows: EXECUnVE OnCCTON V«rn Peterson "The State’s Safe Drinking Water Act contains a per hook-up fee of $5.21 passed in Laws of Minnesota 1992, Chapter 513, Article 6, Section 2 which is to be used to pay for water supply testing as 3490 Icxington avenue nortb, st. pnnl. Minnesota 5S120 (612) 490*3301 r mandated by Federal Law.” Transportadoo Policy (peges 90 and 56) A. Policy V-A page 3a Bo d paragraph, line 3. replace NW with NEW to read NEW STFEET.. B. Policy V-L page 55 and *>6. Bold paragraph starting BUS SYSTEMS AND.....replace LAT in line 1.6. and 8 with LRT and delete D in line 6. r TO: FROM: DATE: RE: City managers, administrators, directors:, altv-rrateb Holmes i Graven, Chartered October 5, 1994 Minnegasco Rate Case TECEIVED OCT 6 1994 cvr<' Of CFCNO lackarouikl ^rsLi.rr^n”'i"99r“Vhe™« PUC reducing the annual revenue increase to $10.9 million (1.91 increase; 11% return on equity). The SRA did not participate in the settlement ^ to budget constraints. The SRA objected, however, increase in fixed customer charges sought by Minnegasco and i g« purchase incentive proposal by Minnegasco that was offer^ late in the proceeding. The matter has been argued before the PUC and the final order will be issued shortly. gurrent If The outcome of this case is very favorable to customers and included a significant victory by the SRA on the cultoS^rcharge Tssue. Firs?T the POC will accept the settlement that will actually result in refunds or credits issued to most current customers because the interim rates commencing last January are higher than the final settled rates. Second, the SRA was the lone party objecting to the rapid increase in residential customer charges that are not related to usage ($3-5 - 1993; $5-6 - proposed in 1994) . The SRA argued that this did not send a proper price signal to consumers (they could do nothing about it) and may unfairly shift the rate burden to economically disadvantaged consumers and conservation minded coSsSSerf. The PUC adopted the SRA position by a 5-0 vote despite Minnegasco and the DPS's opposition. This will savings to residential customers, instead of a fixed increase of $12/year each customer will have the opportunity to 5°^®®^® use of gas and thus pay up to $12 less per year in natural gas bills The cumulative effect for all Minnegasco residential cistomers is the ability, wich prudent use of energy, to save the $6 million in charges that would otherwise have been autoiwtically colTecU^b^ Minnelasco, regardless of usage. This decision has a JMS770«Ssuieo-i significant impact on all gas and electrical energy providers in Minnesota. It forces them to justify higher fixed charges. The SRA's position, in which it joined the DPS and OAG, was also adopted by the PUC regarding the gas purchase incentives proposal by Minnegasco. The SRA argued that any proposal that xs important to consumers should be presented at the beginning case and not toward the latter stages of it when parties may have missed the opportunity to intervene. JWS7704S SUliO-3 r ' 5 i • ? • < ^ > vV I *<' Cambridge Ext. Phase I Cross Lake Area i'.Tl Duluth 1/1 ,--ir.r,:;,':T.Tr:c. I Pairfay Construction Construction Construction Construction [Garrison I 1‘^cnpr Constiuction Conslruction Uc3:siia5Uii' • . . j; iQmnrp Construction Moorhead Lift Station MWr^r! Rtainp Intprcpntor * *' ' 1* • t ' ' » ‘ . M\A/rr. Rliip I pkp \AAA/TP Rolids MWCC Elm Creek Interceptor MWCC Mpis. East Interceptor-ll IA iS VK:<^ * v’. IVV'*' f n ^ lM\A/m M\AAA/TP Hpritrifuae Dewaterino l/AVuCt: i/<hti[.r V / , ^ 1 ■b • ^ J M\A/PP MXAAA/TP PrnrPM Comnutor Svstem M\A7PP Pnepmniinf XAAA/TP Phaspout MWCC Waconia Interceptor Improvements Construction Continuation Continuation Continuation Continuation ?9BtRSnBBSliVariWnWBM Continuation Continuation Continuation Continuation Construction |r/.'■ « t • * I • I »* • • Rockville Construction Construction SL Michaet St Paul CSO }ci • :vi.:|,:iy -c'.'.Vi"' ''f-InUhl’M'’y I ’ I». 11 • ITwo Harbers BIO Constrjction *- • V J # '__ . $ 1,370,000 ' -'.4',; ;.i,» $ 4,208,670 I $ 6,400,000 I -i:? 9 1,478,000 I ^84T400| S 942,300 I 9 ^UU.UUU 'vf'i'I'X'I'I'-i » IU,UUU,UUU [ $ 175,000 c) ■ -WA':*;'! $ 100,000 I $ 6,500,000 ;ir JO. ^ :i3Q.UUU I ; ! I raT ^ATATa 9 OUw»WV/ r STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION COUNTY OF RAMSEY CONTROL AGENCY In the Matter of the Adoption of NOTICE OF PUBLIC the Water Pollution Control Revolving PARTICIPATION Fund 1995 Intended Use Plan Pursuant to Minn. Rules ch. 7077 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) will consider the adoption of the 1995 Intended Use Plan (lUP) for the Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund at the regular public meeting of the MPCA at 9:00 a.m., November 22,1994, in the MPCA Board Room at 520 Lafayette Road, St Paul, Minnesota, 55155-4194. Interested persons are invited to comment on the draft lUP prior to adoption. The Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund, more commonly known as the loan program, provides loans to municipalities for planning, design and construction of wastewater and storm water treatment projects and nonpoint source pollution programs. The 1995 lUP identifies the projects proposed to receive loans from funds available during state fiscal year 1995. As required by the Clean Water Act, each state must annually prepare and submit to the U.S. Environmental Protection agency an lUP as part of its capitalization grant application under the State Revolving Fund program. All projects on the Project Priority List are eligible for the loan program. However, a municipality seeking a loan for construction financing must receive preliminary approval of its facilities plan before it can be placed on the lUP. Replacement on the lUP does not guarantee that a municipality will receive a loan. The Minnesota Public Facilities Authority is responsible for determining the specific projects and loan amounts that can be ftmded based on available funds and its ability to issue bonds. The draft lUP contains 44 projects based on the requests received as of October 1,1994 (see table on back). A number of other municipalities have requested placement on the lUP, but have not yet received preliminary approval of their facilities plans. The 1995 lUP may be amended later to include additional projects, depending on staff workload and the availability of loan funds. Interested persons are invited to comment on the proposed lUP prior to adoption. Any persons may submit written conunents at any time up to November 18,1994, by mailing them to Ms. Mary Jane Schultz at the address given below. In addition, all interested persons shall have the opportunity to present oral or written statements to the MPCA Citizens’ Board at the November 22,1994, meeting. Persons desiring to make oral statements to the Board arc asked to advise the Commissioner of such desire as soon as possible. The Chairperson may restrict the time and manner in which oral comments are submitted, depending on the circumstances. The draft 1995 lUP has been prepared and is available for inspection and copying at the MPCA offices during normal business hours. One free copy of the lUP will also be mailed upon request by contacting: Mary Jane Schultz Program Support Unit, Water Quality Division Miimesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4194 Telephone: (612) 296-7208, TTY: (612)282-5332 Printed on recycled |Miper contiining at least 10% fibers from paper recycled by consumers. r MINUTES QUARTERLY FIRE SERVICE MEETING ■ 2" Tf ?n‘^?Sn5iSce were WayzaH Fire Chief Paul Klapprich; Mound Fire Jim Cox from Long Lake Fire Department; and Steve sSlliv^! oroTO police Cbilf. There was no representative fron Maple Plain Fire Department present Thief Sullivan reported that he had attended » i?"^r£tlnTgoSd eJpe?!ince^“»'wi!“rtiU%^"^^ “li*SeI?ing iay«?a Mating but their dates conflict wxth a Council meeting he usually attends. Chief Sullivan brought up the recent full-scale . SLtioned that radio communications had been a problem. Chief Sullivan suggested that he sponsor a be t;"Sdrrt?a“S‘SS5"c?«Se ^Jerlli^p;^: ;SrFi°re""'“ or fall of 1995. Chief Sullivan asked whether there was “V “"il^^SSise In inter^i in sending fire fighters to 1993, Orono hold the course. In 1994, Maple Plain n course. Is there still a need? It was agreed upon that there was still a ^av training but the fire fighters had a hard ®‘*®“^ir?ll ni^sclass. It was suggested that ®tnce IWnday nxghts^are ^ anyway, that the course might be Sullivan would contact DEMrow either this fall or winter. Chief Sullivan wouio^c^ course Training to see if J**®*-’^, ? works, and others who wouldwould also be open to police, public worxs, onu ww** want to take this training. 1 ( J r h: V . 3490 Lexington Avenue North League of Minnesota Cities St Paul, MN 55126^ if h i ! i i I . I ^ !,; September 28, 1994 TO: Members, MACTA Blue Ribbon Task Force, other interested officials FROM: RE: Ann Higgins. IGR Representative Development of legislative proposals on state telecommunications regulation In view of the decision by Senator Rollings not to bring S. 1822 to a vote on the Senate floor. Minnesota citv officiaU must develop proposals that address cmw regulation of telecommunication providers. U.S. West and other current and potential providers of telecommunications services and infrastructure are sure to seek legislation that will bar any role for local aovernment or requirements for service providers to support construction or provision of community (public), government or educational access to new electronic information systems or services. Attached arc proposcQ policies mi ---------— ------:— I.MC Bwri 9f Pirwwr^ and w-nniiw chair; telec on n^toter 19. Following that action, policy recontmendations will ^/o^arded to LMC member cities for review. On Friday. November 18. city officials will adopt ftnal recommendations at the LMC Policy Adoption Meeting Legislative development meeting An initial meeting to identity basic legislative concepts and a work pljm for the^ development of legislation will be held on fridav, October Z\, at \ :00 p.^-. at the Office. 3490 T^gxington Avenue North. Shoreview. Please let me know if you can attend. I also welcome suggestions of items for the agenda and materials to be mailed out to participants prior to the meeting. I will provide copies of current state stamtes on telephone and cable communications regulation as well as a summary of legislation adopted by the Wisconsin State Legislature this summer. I understand that Bell Atlantic has put forwar a "will carry" proposal for PEG access in cities in other states and will endeavor to have copies of that information available in advance of the meeting. I am also seekmg copies of other telecommunications ordinances from other cities throughout the nation. Finally, I will also discuss the prospect of development of legislative proposals with those cities which have adopted (or are considering) telecommunications permit requirements to determine if attorneys ,, .u,-, in novfirinnfmn in nt^CU^^IOn^ I / 16 North f44 Force, other interested officials n state telecommunications regulation ^ f ** SenateJm address changes p .(^r and other current and potential toe sure ,0 seek legislation that or service providers to support ament or educational access to new Lbe considered fnr approval hv thm ecoi^endations will be forwar^o . citv officials will adopt final d a work plan for the IL21. at 1 00 D.m.. at fh> T>fr e let me know if you can attend. aterials to be mailed out to current state statutes on telephone adopted by the t Bell Atlantic has put forward a Js and will endeavor to have copies ^ also seeJdng copies of other*^ ‘ nation. Finally. I will also with those cities which have uiremenu; to determine if attorneys -----------di.cu.sinn. ^ \ Meetings with local legislatorsLalso urge cable administrators and rifv crhcrfitu ... .gtoc Sunutos snd Renres.n„nv.. ,..Zduimg Wbcr. Talk with them arTour (JblH^erfLiS^/ t.'commission about the urgencv of maintaii no i • u members of the cableof ttlecommunications iirfraswcnire and ^^ic« Gree Mot* t''*'®’’™™'' “““ »“* ““ meeting NWCC has already had with their i<v,i i„ Mwre has spoken with me about the who is also House Majorir^ Leader.* '“•'toker. Representative Phil Carruthers. i&^h^llglSi.'iir^di^^^^^ - out to get recent developme^m of inter-a^L’^el^^^^htgr^^^^^ Se^nS^ Attachment \ i* ■’rr” ■» *• <>— and reduce the paperwork burdens.’ appHcaUon p.trocess limit their use. t J 1^# LE-9. City Involvement with Telecommunications Providers through neighborhoods and over city Streets. ^ ^ ^ mformaaon superhighway" Solution: Cittes should have the authority to require teleconununication providers to: obtoin permits and foiiow local standards for the use of local rioht. of property to lay wire, cable, or other faciliUes to ca“rt votovSro or * . locations within city corporate boundaries; ^ ^ "*"‘*‘* ‘® in the provisiVision oftelecommunications services at the local level; Kver™”"" Offered at the compensate cities for the use of public rights-of-way from any provider of local c“erlZ"'‘'“’P”"" »» I Opportunitydevelopment Solutions: r Local businesses, schools and educational institutions, and government offices should have access to information technology and services that meet technical standards for signal quality at reasonable rates; CiUes should identify how information technology can strengthen local economic activity, education, workforce training, health care, etc.; Local units of government should work together to maximize effective use of information technology to assure that the local information infrastructure can respond to the variety of needs at the local level. LE-11. Local Permitting Authority for Telecommunications Problem: City franchising authority is viewed as a barrier to competition in the development of electronic information networks and telecommunications services. Solution Current city franchising authority should be replaced in favor of local permitting authority: State and federal governments must develop and enforce minimum technical and connectivity stondards and rate regulation in the absence of competition; The state should license telecommunications providers to ensure they have the financial, technical, and legal qualifications to provide proposed services; The state legislature should develop legislation to protect cities’ interests in the management of local public rights-of-way and restructure and simplify the regulatory framework for telecommunications service providers in the state. LE-12. Adequate Fundin,7. for Transportation Problem: Current funding io; roads and for transit systems across all government levels in the state is not adequate. Solution: Minnesota should value, and adequately fund, all transportation svstenB in the state. The state needs to provide an objective basU to determine the complete needs of the increase costs in the future. Cities support an increase in the and urge legislature to institute additional revenue sources that can be e ica e o ransp programs. Cities should receive revenues necessary to meet present an u ure 12 IS, and government offices irvices that meet technical ui strengthen local economic etc.; naximiie effective use of madon infrastructure can nmiinications Dtnpetition in the development of ced in favor of local permitting orce minimum technical and ence of competition; rs to ensure they have the le proposed serWces; »tect cities' interests in the cture and simplify the e providers in the state. OSS all government levels in the transportation systems in the line the complete needs of the tnpact on the economic health ying current expenditures will ! gas tax and urge the ! dedicated to transportation present and future f .* *'■. ■; • •• - -CrfYOFORO^.^^ > !• 4 'A ^ * , *■, ;* %' * • • s•V. V i'. • . #. fa I % ' October 14, 1994 City of Orono Municipal Offices P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 • . To The Honorable Edward Callahan, Mayor of the City of Orono and Orono City Council Members: • a ' This letter is in regard to a one half acre bui ng site which I am purchasing from Mrs. Jacci Segner. The ilding site is located near Clair Rood's pond and is approximately 525 feet off of Navarre Lane on an undeveloped, unmaintained City of Orono street called Hillside Place (please see enclosed map and plat). This one half acre building site is an atypical building site. The access to it presents more than one problem for myself as its owner. Firstly, as mentioned, above,. the Hillside Place street is about 525 feet of unmaintained street for myself as a private resident to keep plowed in the winter^ and, eventually, finish in • some form such as asphalting. Secondly,' the major problem is that accessing my lot from Hillside Place presents a problem with a drainage'ditch in the area. This, drainage'ditch is almost impossible to work around in the construction of a driveway to my site and is not located on my property. The third problem is that the building site itself slopes to the east, and after consultation with an architect, it seems logical to position the house with the back facing the pond to adapt to the natural contours of the property and allow the existing mature trees to stay.in place. The house would then be posi- cioned with its backside on Hillside Place rather than its front. Inorder for the above problems to be worked around, I would suggest, that accessing my site from a currently undeveloped street called.Wallace Ave. be considered; This .would cut the y' distance from a developed.street to' the • lot' itself in half, being •••■V '.V-approstimate ly 225;. f eet would' be-ylgss: j:o. plow ' and. maint a in..<V s CtTYOFOROm ' ‘'. #r,:. .• •• .-... , A--.■.. ■ ■• . .. .t . -• .- .■.•'.■■ - ■• w-'V. V ■ -• *■ ‘ r % , -'■ • . ;. - V-■ .1•JH M of the City of Orono lore bui ng site which I . The ilding site is pproximately 525 feet off maintained City of Orono ! enclosed map and plat). atypical building site, problem for *uyself as its Hillside Place street is for myself as a private Id, eventually, finish in yr the major problem is B presents a problem with rainage ditch is almost ztion of a driveway to my ite itself slopes to the hitect, it seems logical Lng the pond to adapt to and allow the existing use would then be posi- :e rather than its front. # • wor)ced around, I would currently undeveloped Bd; This-.would cut the ot'itself in' half, being - . plow ■ and maintain. •>V*- C‘ -V~- i.-'.-v-v ^>5' ►£5a:Ltl-u t_-1. •. * * tu/uoim uernarason ^wno came out to view the property^at my request on September 14th. While he said he really jmderstood my problem and would want the same thing, were ne me, he denxed approval of this request. based on the following: . * f ’ _ ■ . » 1. "The frontage of the property is on Hillside Place." Just because the frontage is on Hillside Place does not mean that this is the best access to the site itself. 2. "Sanitary sewer is served from Hillside Place." The sewer can be connected to the house regardless of • where the sanitary sewer is served from. 3. "Municipal water will serve the property in the future from Hillside Place." This property can have its own well, if desired, and is not required to use city water. Even if city water was desired. It still can be accessed from Hillside without a problem. 4. "There would be a negative impact to the resident adjacent to Wallace Avenue." The home of the resident adjacent to Wallace Ave. is within the minimum set back from hie lot line required by building no trees would have to be removed inorder to use^ When Mrs. Segner originally pur­chased this property, she was told by the City that there was a request to vacate Wallace Ave. by the adjacent neigh- ua^*nf1fa?”®?^ denied with the reason being that theuse of Wallace Ave. may be required in order to access this • ^ ^®®1 tSat a Resi­dential driveway will have a negative impact on anyone. 5. "It has always been assumed that driveway access fo this . property would be served from Hillside Place." driveway access to my site would be liltely based on Hillside Place M ?he Btreer which was to serve 9 lots as showii “r?”' «=he number of mmm ••C; y , • ’-i '»p existing mature trees* ' . .v*^«'.' .-;'.;*. '‘V , **. - * * ' • • ■ ^ • * . ksCquestion^ CitY/Of / •a who came out to view the •.14th. While he said he want the same thing, were St based on the following:♦ » , •is'on Hillside Place,"llside Place does not to the site itself. Hillside Place," house regardless of from, e property in the future i, if desired, and is not if city water was desired, side without a problem, tact to the resident :o Wallace Ave. is within Line required by building 3 removed inorder to use . Segner originally pur- by the City that there B, by the adjacent neigh- the reason being that the d in order to access this o not feel that a resi- ive impact on anyone. at driveway access to.this Hillside Place." ccess to my site would be■ based on Hillside Place, to serve 9 lobs as .shown _ re aware, the number of now' haS' been reduced .to • ^ •« ♦ 'j.mm88 ('TTv.^.,--1 .1;? . • ' ; -' *. ** i ^ ■* ’ V • *.• *- - iiV--____^ _ ____________address but accessing *your ' •. . .. . property from Bayview Place may cause, confusion for .,* ' emergency-response (9il) . " • ' . ‘U. . v . . . . ,• ••• ‘ ..v-vIf-the"lot is going to have a Navarre Lane address, 911 • . will be confused anyway since the site is not on Navarre Lane end, infact, is a long distance from Navarre Lane..By using Wallace Ave. as an access to the property, the entrance would be off Bayview Place--a Bayview Place address .... would: seem l<^ical and appropriate. The access would be ; much shorter should 911 ever need to call. ' *.*•■*' • ‘ • V ' # ■ a when Mr. Gerhardson called me to tell me of his decision to deny my original request, I asked him what his recommendation would be, and he suggested that I appeal the decision to the City Council members. Hence, this letter. At this point, I would like to request that the Mayor and City Council members come to my building site to see for themselves what I am referring to. should you want another opinion by a neighbor, Clair Rood, would be able to tell you from a contra­ ctor's perspective the problems that I am addressing can be best remedied by the Wallace Ave. access as a solution. I respectfully request that you give this your serious considera­ tion. I will await your response. Sincerely, M. Dahl enc. >. • J.,/ '•ik t - . * i V/^ • • -C , V V ,• , . . "l* t '.V ,* \ •• \ "0,0 « V«C*fl9lnc «r *c n« •*• .1. mwi WiriiHraPi mma^boi^14600 Minnetonka Boutevofd Minnetonka Minnesota 55345 telephone (61 :0 939-6389 • fax (612) 9J5-9IW Mayor ’s Office Karen J. Anderson OCT n •u- «».■ October 12,1994 Mayor Edward Callahan Qty of Orono P.O.Box66 Crystal Bay MN SS323 Dear Mayor Callahan and Members of the City Council: I vou to suDDOft the efforts of West Tonka Imeivenllon to «spen a womeifs I umJeistand the (JifBculty ofyouide<&ioii. The neighbo nofp ryi^ 2^ often express legitiniatefearta«l concerns. Sunilat concerns were expressed when the Scjoomer Shelter moved to Minnetonka in 1985. area have been affected. at the capacity allowed by their conditional use permit. After an initial period of apprehenshm, we have found that a numher of the b^^f^ods of 5eW>un«er Shelter, sharing food and household goods with the resident clients. rm saddened by tlie fact that such facilities are necessary in our society. *1 wc can locate them in a residential setting where the women have the supportive environir«nt they require. ' !.VT.y .S'V ' . . ... ,1 . a' «' T»' V 1 • r * ; ' 4 t\_ • mm V 'si V.!V' I 111 nifaipiir iiiiiiiiiifi I « «« . ... -*•. \• -U»*< ^ V ^ *s..’ -,: "-5 ^r*- vV'^»* ^, *U5«/^ t>< *.. -•.-LK.^Page Two : :t" ■:*.^' 4--:;.?„p£.xv f • ^ ■^e. - i’.,.. -ni.- -j **A* A. r '>1' .":X » - ■. 1. ' •■•n>l >*Please let ne know if you'd, like more information.if VSincerely,Karen Anderson Mayor - A V •*• KA‘P<^ . .u ..c: Ronald Moorse, Orono Administrator Greg Sicheneder, West Tonka Intervention 'sM r TO: FROM; DATE; Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse. City Administrator October 20. 1994 SUBJECT; Proposal to the City of Long Lake for Accounting Services The Council has previously been advised that staff has discu^ with <heJ^ng Lake Ci^ Administrator the potential provision of accounting services to Long Lake. The Finance staff Stg"monWrfi “out the day-to-day accounting responsibilities and Orono staff providing overview support and preparing monthly financial reports. 1.) The actual hours required by city staff. 2.) Hours required of an intern or additional clerical hours to free up hours for the finance staff to take on the additional work for Long Lake. Staff will have a preliminary proposal for the Council to review at the October 24 Council meeting. r TO; FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse. City Administrator ^^ October 19, 1994 SUBJECT: Completion of City Facilities .he progression of expendin.res on city facUU^s beeinning with Uie initial budget and moving through the March 92 cost estimate naade y SJucUon Manager, the bid amounts received on April 16th, the revised cost estimate after »Sr"os. reduction efforts, the current expendimres to-date and the authonzed acmal expenditures. The summary also includes a comparison of Uk auUmrized acmal expei^m^ budgeted iJLnUi. This shows that the actual expenditures cs^ in at $4,280,975 versus budgeted amount of $4,260,000. This is an overage of $20,975 or .5%. The toul -net- cost (expendimres less revenues) is $84,525 Iffig ton the budget^ net cost, dim 10 the substantially higher revenue received from the sale of a portion of e sewer p property. StonStopS acmal cost of all approved facilities expendimms. there me a numto of items remaining to ■“"'P!"*"would parking lot and the plug-ins for the Police squads. insull an air exchange unit at an approximate cost of 53-4 ^Sr^Saiion mat to architect directed to proceed with “o* “ ties, “ add tos air exchange unit to to existing furnace P~^ f Quotes would then be obtained from contractors and brought to e , City Facilities Final Cost Statement•:>|aa»4aUlmiBuiMing ConstructionCity HcIVPolicc/Public Works Unhealed Storage Sand A Salt Storage Silo Doualopoieot Site Utilities Soil Correetton Landscaping/Screening Bituminous Curb A Gutter/ Gravel A Crushed Rock at P. W. Oemolition/Existing Bldgs Pond Construction Furnishings A Equipment City Hall Allowance Public Works Equipment Consultant Costs Arching Fee Costs Arch Reimbursable Professional Fees Bonding Fees Discount Costs Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Budeet March1992Estimate April 16lh August 2Sth1992 1992 Expenditures OutstandingBids Estimate To Dale Contracts Actual ActualOver (Under)2.496^ ISO^ 75JOOO 2.541^ 8S/K)0 45 000 2362^39 80JOOO SD.000 2.778.373 63JOOO 37JOOO 2337375 0 32,768 2JOOO 0 3j641 2339375 0 36.409 2.721.(2371.968 2.992 239 2378,373 2370,743 5341 2376,384 25.( 160 Jl 60j( 90J 35J 36,430 235.327 60.000 90300 35JOOO 5.400 36.430 :.35.327 35384 70.531 3SJOOO 5,400 39378 262324 35384 70,531 35300 5.400 39378 302.115 25,000 68350 52.101 0 0 11.144 0 12.300 39378 302,115 36.144 68350 64.401 370.462,157 418.572 447,917 490344 23344 514.388 I75.J 175JI 175,000 175300 115,000 135300 11S,< 135/ 114.535 112,395 0 0 114.535 112,395 350,000 2S0J 250300 226,930 226330 Subtotal 215.0no 0 27.000 60.000 60,000 362,000 215.000 0 27.000 50.000 50,000 342.000 215.000 0 27.000 50.000 50,000 342.000 215300 0 27300 50,000 50,000 227311 0 27300 47,931 50300 0 0 0 0 0 22731 1 0 27300 47331 SD300 352,542 352.542 34337S (1S5300) (38,591) 1SS.384 14378 142,115 (23356) (213») 29301 4300 (60365) (62305) (123370) 12311 0 0 (12369) (10300) (9358) City Facilities Final Cost StatementLaod C«mULand CoaU (Inc. Road & Seiwer) Subtotal Dudact292W)March1992Ettimate292JD00 April 16th August 2Sth1992 1992 Expenditures OutstandingBids Estimate To Dnie Contracts292JOOO292JOOO»J,313 Actual ActualOver (Under)303413 11413 Misc Coats Moving Printing Subtotal 15,000 0 15^ IS) 3,( ISJOOO ISjOOO 3j000 5.119 2499 7.418 0 0 5,il9 2499 7A18 (9481) 2499 (7482) Owner Continge icy Subtotal 123J875 (52311)31.710 (1S0400) Total Project Costa Less Reoenues Total Net Cost 4460, (184.500) 4460 4460.4460 jono 4451 JB90 (184.500) (184.500) (184400) (290JOOO) 4.975.500 4J075.500 4375.500 4J075.500 3361 JB90 29j0eS 4480475 291185 3490475 2047S (290400) (105400) 303.31)11313 5,U9 (9381) 2.299 2399 7418 (7382)