Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-27-1994 Council PacketL AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 27, 1994, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUTSCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda, memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL C all *1. CONSENT AGENDA m APPROVAL OF MINUTES *2. Regular Meeting of June 13, 1994 nil).!, 1994 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Candace Rowlette Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) AUDIT REPORT 3.Presentation by Auditor - 1993 Comprehensive Financial Report - Ken Malloy and Sheri Oeltjenbruns POLICE CHIEF REPORT 4.Draft Spring Park 1995 Contract Proposal ZONING ADMIIVISTRATOR^S REPORT ••APPLICANTS *•Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) original resolutions at the Recorder’s desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials. 5.#1915 George Applebaum, 4109 Highwood Road - Variance - Resolution 6.#1933 Tandem Properties, 2645/3025 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution 7.#1936 Charles E. Troyak, 2525 Kelley Avenue - Variance - Resolution 8.#1939 Timothy Otten, 425 Tumham Road - Variance - Resolution 9.1994 Marina Licenses - Lakeside Marina Gayles Marina MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT lO Designating a New Location for Precinct #4 Polling Location - Resolution 11.Request to Delete Sewer Assessment on Tax Forfeit Lot Released for Sale to Adjacent Property Owner 12.Charlotte Knutson Retirement - Resolution of Appreciation 13.Monument Relocation - AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JLTVE 27, 19W, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO. MINNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (•14.) LICENSES (•15.) BILLS f UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 06/27 06/28 06/28 06/29 07/04 07/05 07/05 07/11 07/18 07/25 Council meeting 7:30 p.m. Council work session 2:00 p.m. Highway 12 Mediation meeting 3:00 p.m. Orono Council Chambers Council work session 8:(X) a.m. HOLIDAY - Office Closed Council Work Session 8:00 a.m. Park Commission 7:15 p.m. Council meeting 7:30 p.m. Planning Commission 7:00 p.m. Council meeting 7:30 p.m. i r \ COMMISSION cotmciL PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEBTING DATE Q; ’ ,Q ^ ‘ ^ j ^ PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (pl«a«0 print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. lU. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. K i ■ ■i. f ^■ minutes of the regular orono cit%' MEETING HELD ON JUNE 13, 19W ^^JHClL M ROLL JUN 2 7 2994 ^ofomtmsent: Actine MavorThe Council met on the above date with the following members present; Acting Gabriel Jabbour, Councilmembers Charles Kelley, J. Diann Goetten, ^ JoElIen Hu^. The following represented staff; City Attorney Tom Barrett. City Administrator Ron Moorse Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron. Public Works Director John Gcrhardson City Engineer Glenn Cook, and Recorder Barbara Anderson. Acting Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. (♦#1) CONSENT AGENDA Goeiten requested that items #10 and #12 be added to the Consent Agenda. Kelley requested that items #7, #9. and #14 also be added to the Consent Agenda. It was moved by Hurr. seconded by Jabbour, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 4.nays 0. APPROVAL OF MCSUTES (*#2) REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 23, 1994 It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 23, 1994 as submitted. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#3) COUNCIL WORK SESSION OF MAY 24, 1994 It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the Minutes of the Council Work Session of May 24, 1994 as submitted. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#4) COUNCIL WORK SESSION OF JUNE 6, 1994 It was moved by Hurr. seconded by Jabbour, to approve the Minutes of the Council Work Session of June 6, 1994 as submitted. Ayes 4, nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Park Commissioner Susan Wilson was present and noted that the Council had received the 1994 Park Commission Action Agenda in their packet, and stated she was present to answer any questions. Hurr inquired if the Adopt-A-Park program was in place, and Gerhardson responded that they had six to seven locations spoken for already. Hurr requested a list from staff of those people who were participating in this program. 1 ■'1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CTT\ COUNCH. MEETING HELD ON JUNTE l-L 1994 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Dale Lindquist, Representative There were no Planning Commission comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS Barbara Lurkins, 776 North Brown Road, stated that Long Lake is experiencing a surfeit of jet skiers which is causing noise pollution for the residents who reside on the lake. She stated that it appears to be an r^rganized group of jet skiers who use the lake daily, and she stated they are on the lake all during the daylight hours. She believed there were too many jet skiers using the lake for too many hours, and she requested that the City Council do something to lessen the amount of time that jet skiers would be allowed to use the lake. Hurr inquired if it might not be possible to require all jet ski users to obtain a permit before using the lake, as she felt that an ordinance would be too difficult to enforce. Since this appears to be an organized group, she felt that perhaps a permit process would solve the problem. Lurkins responded that she felt an ordinance would give the police the authority to limit activity whereas a permit would not do this. Jabbour commented that the City Council will make every effort to deal with this issue. Dick Flint stated he also lives close to Long Lake and was present to reinforce what Mrs. Lurkins had stated. He stated that he did not live on the lake shore, but was somewhat buffered by trees between the lake and his home, and he still found the noise levels from the jet skis extremely high. He felt that the means of enforcement could be done in conjunction with the City of Long Lake to limit the activity. Discussion ensued regarding possible means of regulating activity. Gerhardson stated that there are presently no ordinances in effect which would regulate the hours of activity or establish any limits on Long Lake. Acting Mayor Jabbour requested that staff look into what types of ordinances other communities might have in place which might be utilized by Orono to remedy this problem. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (m #1885 - LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2675 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Mabusth briefly reviewed the existing zoning on the property and the zoning as proposed by the developer. She introduced Terry Forbord, representing Lundgren Brothers. Kelley commented that he did not feel the developer had reduced the density as previously directed by the City Council and he did not see why the application was before them again. _________ r minutes of the regular orono city council ^fEETING HELD ON JUNE 13, 1994 (#6) #1885 - LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2675 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (CONTINUED) Terry Forbord 935 East Wavzata Boulevard, the City Council had reviewed the original propoal and that proposed a density of 58 units. They have revised the plan and are now proposing a density of 44 units. This was the plan reviewed by the Planning Commission in May. Jabbour inquired if the developer was aware that since three ot the Planning Coinmissioners had conflicts of interest. Mayor Callahan had appointed Council members Kelley and Gotten to su on the Planning Commission to help them make a decision regarding this proposal. Forbord responded that he was aware of that. Mr. Forbord stated that they are trying to develop a property, which is very difficult to develop. He reviewed the proposed plan and noted that the property cannot be served with septic systems because the water table is too high. They have reduced the density to 44 units which is the fewest number of units they feel they can have and still have a viable project Because of the extensive grading required to develop the property the costs will be increased by approximately SSO.OCX) per lot, which is extremely high. They have created a large transition area along l e northern portion of the site, and are requesting the rezoning for the southern portion of the project to a 1-acre density. They believe it could be economically feasible at the densuy of 44 units. He noted that the location of the property along Highway 12 was indicative of a more intense use as specified in the Comprehensive Plan. The land does not have the attractive rura features which so many other sites in Orono have, which would make this p.operty difficult to develop as two acre lots. He noted they are conforming to the present zoning on the northern portion of the property and are requesting a zoning change for the southern portion. Goetten asked how small the lots would be, and Forbord responded that he did not have those figures immediately available. Jabbour commented he had a logistic problem with the plan because there was no hardship demonstrated and he felt they were being asked to grant a variance to the zoning and they were strictly prohibited from granting a variance on ‘he b^‘* of financial gain. He noted that the City Council was under no obligation to create buildab e area for a development. He felt that the density proposed for this project was too high and while sewer might be the best means of development, he still felt that the two acre minimum was the best. He noted that the PUD zoning does give the developer benefit because of the sewer. Hurr inquired what the smallest lot size would be, and what the density would be in the multiple residential portion of the project. Mabusth responded that it could be six units per acre, but the exact density was up to the developer making the proposal. Discussion ensued regarding transition between the subject property and the surrounding areas. -I i r MiNt’TES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 13. 1994 (#6) #1885 - LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2675 SKTH AVENUE NORTH - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (CONTINUED) land in Orono was developable. He noted that the City Council was not responsible for the developer ’s expenses and if it could not be developed at a reasonable cost, that was unavoidable. Hurr commented that the reason for having the multiple residential zoning classification was to provide alternative and affordable housing for Orono residents. Discussion ensued regarding where the high density residential portion of the project should be located. (joetten stated she felt that the proposed 44 unit density was too high, but she would like to see the developer rework his plans and come back to the City with a revised proposal. Jabbour noted that the Council agreed with the PUD zoning designation, and he hoped that the developer would be able to achieve a 2 acre density. Forbord stated they would contemplate the comments made by the Council. Hurr noted that she did not have a conflict of interest in this proposal because her sister w^ involved with legal representation only for the upplirmt, but had no financial investment in the project. (*#7) #1904 ERIC AND SHELLY LIUEQUIST, 3490 BIRCH LANE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution No. approving #19()4 Conditional Use Permit/Variance for Eric and Shelly Liljequist at 3490 Birch Lane. Ayes , nays 0. (#8) #1915 GEORGE APPLEBAUM, 4109 HIGHWOOD ROAD, VARIANCE Mabusth reviewed the proposal and the recommendation made by the Planning Commission. George Applebaum was present and noted that the steps shown on the plan were necessary in order to maintain the laridscaping, which is extensive on the property, because of the steep slopes. Goetten stated she found it difficult to approve the request because of the large amount of hardcover on the property. Applebaum stated that they concentrated on removing hardcover area in the 0-75 setback area. Hurr stated there should be more hardcover reduction on the property, and she agreed with Goetten. Il MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JL7<E 13. 1994 (#8) #1915 GEORGE APPLEBAUM. 4109 HIGHW (CONTINUED) »D ROAD, VARIANCE Kelley stated he supported the proposal because the applicant was improving the setbacks and he had reduced the hardcover in the 0-7S setback area. He viewed it as an overall improvement to the propeny and supported the proposal. Jabbour stated that if the Council adopted the Planning Commission recommendation, would the applicant have any problem complying with the requirements for additional hardcover removal. Applebaum responded that he was willing to remove the hardcover in those areas indicated on the plans. Goetten inquired what the hardship was and Applebaum responded that the topography and the existing setbacks from the buildings along with the existing retaining walls to hold the slopes on the property. Discussion ensued regarding the amount of hardcover on the property, and the size of the addition to the house. Goetten commented that she felt that the lot was overbuilt to begin with and more was being added to the site with the proposed addition than should be built. Applebaum responded that to live in a house on a lake without any decks would be unacceptable, and he would leave the property as it exists if the Council required him to remove them from his plans. He noted that he had gone to great expense to have plans drawn to reflect the changes required by the Planning Commission, and he was not willing to remove anything else from the plans. Hurr moved to approve #1915 Variance for George Applebaum at 4109 Highwood Road with the provision that the hardcover in the 75-250 area not be increased. The motion failed for lack of a second. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley to approve #1915 variance for George Applebaum, 4109 Highwood Road, subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes 2, nays 2. Hurr and Goetten voted no. It was moved by Jabbour. seconded by Kelley, to table #1915 variance for George Applebaum at 4109 Highwood Road until a full Council is present. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#9) #1927 MARY K. MCCARTY, 245 TONKA AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3437 It was moved by Hurr. seconded by Jabbour, to acopt Resolution No. 3437 approving #1927 variance tor Mary K. McCarty at 245 Tonka Avenue, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes 4. nays 0. r j-*- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 13, 1994 (•#10)#1028 SUZANNE K. WACKER, 1115 BROWN ROAD SOUTH VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3458 It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution No. 3438 approving #1928 variance for Suzanne K. Wacker at 11 IS Brown Road South, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#11) #1930 MARGARET P. COST, 255 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3439 Mabusth reviewed the proposal andi the Planning Commission recommendation. Margaret Cost was present. Hu:” asked why there was not a shared driveway because the drop in elevation would make a shared driveway the best choice for this area. Goetten concurred and stated she would like to see both property owners work together to resolve this. Mabusth noted that the Council four years ago had approved a separate access for this project and there was a resolution on file. Margaret Cost stated she would prefer to have a separate driveway because the differences in grade would make a driveway coming from her neighbor ’s property extremely steep, and she did not feel that was safe. She was also concerned about the neighbor ’s children playing in their driveway, and believed separate access for her property was the best solution for this property. Discussion ensued regarding why the variance was needed based on the topography and the wetland regulations. The building envelope was discussed and alternatives for the building footprint were examined. The slopes were discussed and the maintenance of a 2:1 slope was explained. Adrian Kearney, 265 South Brown Road, stated he was concerned about the driveway and the slopes. They felt that a smaller house would fit better on the site. He felt the proposed plan was too aggressive a plan and the location of the driveway was very close to their property line. He felt they should share a driveway access. Kelley inquired if Mr. Kearney was aware of the subject lot when he purchased his property, and Mr. Kearney responded that he had researched this area thoroughly prior to purchasing his home. Mabusth stated that the driveway issue was settled four years ago and that to change the access now to a shared access may result in both the Court and the City being placed in a difficult legal dilemma with the current owner. Goetten inquired if there would be any liability on the part of the City if the tributary should flood and Mabusth responded that the house would be too high to be affected by any flooding. rtiTiJfiMiiil ill ( '• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COlfNCIL MEETING HELD ON JL?NE 13, 1994 (#11) #1930 MARGARET P. COST, 255 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3439 (CONTINUED) It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution No. 3439 approving #1930 variance for Margaret P. Cost at 255 Brown Road South, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes 3, nays 1. Hurr voted no. (•#12)#1931 MEGAN TULLY, 1910 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCE/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 3440 It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution No. 3440 approving #1931 Variance/Conditional Use Permit for Megan Tully at 1910 Shoreline Drive as recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#13) REQUEST FOR BUU.DING PERMIT FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION - LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD ADDITION - RESOLUTION NO. 3441 Chuck Dillerud was present representing Tony Eiten Construction requested that the Council approve issuing a building permit for Lot 1, Block 2, Old Crystal Bay Road Addition. He stated they wish to construct a Parade Home on this lot, and they need to begin construction as soon as possible in order to have the house completed prior to the Parade of Homes in the fall. He explained tha» t? ey piun to gain access to the property via a driveway to an old barn coming from Watertown Road until the permanent access from Countryside Drive West is available. Kelley inquired if Countryside Drive West would be installed prior to the Parade of Homes and stated that if it was not. he would be concerned about parking problems occurring on Watertown Road. It was moved by Hurr. seconded by Kelley, to adopt Resolution No. 3441 approving issuance of a building permit for Lot 1, Block 2, Old Crystal Bay Road Addition, subject to the condition that the access from Countryside Drive West be completed and a Certificate of (Occupancy issued for the house prior to the Parade of Homes. Jabbour requested that the motion be amended to include that the subdivision be finalized before any additional permits will be issued for this development. Hurr so moved, Kelley seconded the amendment to the motion. Ayes 4, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Hurr inquired about the notices for the School District building because several residents had stated they did not receive any notice of this application. Mabusth responded that they had been required to state that the bleachers would be next to the tennis courts for clarity, which some residents had found confusing. Also, there were problems with the notification process on this application. ■. r'.rm i- I r^fcitA.Ti. i ■"k .-1>—, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCtt MEETING HELD ON JUNE 13. 1994 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (CONTINUED) Jabbour noted that the Long Lake Fire Department had held a practice bum exercise which was very impressive. He noted that Mayor Callahan had requested that he inquire about the raises for salaries and noted that he felt that all employees on the same level should be treated equally regardless of whether they were members of a union or not. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to approve an increase to the pay ranges of all salaried staff of 2.75 %. The salary adjustments will be effective January I, 1994 for all salaried staff except the City Administrator and Police Chief, who received step adjustments effective June 1, 1994. Ayes 4, nays 0. Hurr stated that there were issues concerning County Road 15 which need to be decided and requested that this item be scheduled for a Work Session. Kelley requested a separate meeting for this item, since it would take quite a bit of discussion to address, and he felt that would be too long a meeting if the discussion of the septic systems were on the same agenda. Hurr left the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Kelley stated that the Fire Relief Association had informed him that the number of calls for service had increased significantly from last year, and they were on budget in most areas, but the number of calls was the biggest variable when making up a budget. He also requested staff to be sure that signs were posted regarding the closing of Old Crystal Bay Road prior to that actually occurring to give residents notice that it was going to occur. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT (♦#14)AWARD BID - OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD IMPROVEMENT It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to award the bid for the Old Crystal Bay Road Project to Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. in the amount of $157,105.(X) contingent up>on MSA approval. Ayes 4, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#15) AWARD BID - WHEEL TYPE LOADER It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Jabbour, to award the bid to St. Joseph Equipment Company for one new front end loader with plow and wing in an amount of $98,145.00. Ayes 4, nays 0. 8 I W CITY COUNCILB 13. 1994held a practice bum exercise which wasquested that he inquire about the raisesthe same level should be treated equally•not. 3ve an increase to the pay ranges of all :ffective January 1. 1994 for all salaried /ho received step adjustments effective load 15 which need to be decided and 1.Kelley requested a separate meeting n to address, and he felt that would be IS were on the same agenda. med him that the number of calls for ley were on budget in most areas, but g up a budget. He also requested staff of Old Crystal Bay Road prior to that ing to occur. tOAD IMPROVEMENT the bid for the Old Crystal Bay Road $157,105.00 contingent upon MSA rd the bid to St. Joseph Equipment g in an amount of $98,145.00. Ayes / MINIA'ES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCILMEETING HELD ON JUNE 13, 1994(#16) CRYSTAL BAY SITE BUILDING DEMOLITIONMoorse reviewed the history of the building and Goetten commented she felt it was tooexpensive a property to retain, and she felt it should be demolished. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to demolish the building based on the cost factor of retaining it, and the liability of the City at having an empty building sitting there. Ayes 3, nays 0. Jabbour commented he felt it should be demolished as soon as possible, and requested staff to inform Council of the costs of this demolition. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT (#17) PARTIAL RELEASE OF CONDITIONS OF SUBDIVISION APPROVAL Tom Barrett stated that the developer has posted a letter of credit covering the cost of the roadway, so the condition in the resolution has been met. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the partial release of conditions of subdivision approval for Foxwood Second Addition. Ayes 3, nays 0. LICENSES It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to approve the following licenses; Garbage and Refuse Collector’s License Septic System Installer Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#19) BILLS It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to approve payment of the All Funds Account as submitted. Ayes 4, nays 0. .. AWOURNMENT l\.flNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO c m'COUNCIL �fEETING HELD ON JUNE 13, 1994 The Council adjourned to Executive Session at 9:45 p.m. Gabriel Jabbour, Acting May<.'r ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clt>:-k 10 Jf REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: ITEM NO: Department Approval; Nane Tom Kuehn Tllle Finance Director * Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrators Report Item Description: 1993 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Attachments: •Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Year Ended December 31, 1993 •Management Report to the City council for the Year Ended December 31, 1993 Representatives of the City’s Auditor, Malloy Karnowski Radosevich and Co., Ken Malloy and Sheri Oeitjenbruns, will be present at the June 27th Council meeting to provide information regarding the City’s finances as presented in the accompanying reports, which are included for your review. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Acceptance of 1993 Comprehensive Annual Report. Proposed Motion: Moved by _, seconded by _, to accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 1993. Ayes_, Nays r TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor <nd City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator ^4 *^ ^ ^ i • • ■MftiM d • June 22, 1994 JUN 2 7 1994 CITY OF (MONO SUBJECT:Spring Park Police Proposal Attached is a draft proposal for the provision of police services to Spring Park in 1995. The proposal includes the proposed 1995 Police Budget and cost allocation to Spring Park. Steve Sullivan will be available to discuss the proposal at the June 27 Council meeting. I ► * i} iPHMMW ir*<. v>' ..4^ I I i 1 I i « t I Ban June 21, 19!?4 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Spring Park P.O. Box 452 Spring Park, Minnesota 55384 Honorable Mavor and Citv Council The City of Orono does hereby submit a proposal and proposed contract for the provision of police services to the City of Spring Park in 1995. The City of Orono proposes to provide 24 hour police service by assigning and stationing in Spring Park one officer, 24 hours per day. seven days per week. Orono further proposes to provide additional officers for response in the case of multiple calls or calls requiring more than one officer. The proposal also provides that the police department will handle animal complaint calls and handle pick-up and impound animals as necessary. In its police services proposal for 1994, the city and police department committed themselves to providing the highest quality police services and the highest level of responsiveness to the City of Spring Park ’s police needs. The l994 contract was a one year agreement to enable the City of Orono and the police department to demonstrate a level of service and responsivertess to enable Spring Park to be confident in both maintaining its relationship with Orono for police services and in considering entering into a multi-year Honorable Mayor and City Council Cit>' of Spring Park June 21, 1994 page 2 F agreement for police services rr^rnmitment to Qual ity- and Resr^jnsivenesS The City of Orono and the police department began to cany- out their commitment to provide top quality services and a high level of responsiveness in 1993. The police services proposal for 1994 included a substantial cost reduction through a change in the cost allocation formula that had been requested by the City of Spring Park. A number of other contract language changes were made in response to concerns raised by the Sprmg Park Ctty Attorney. One of the more signiftcam changes was the additvn of language to identify the speciftc reasons for which an officer could leave the City of Spring Park to respond to a call in another city. Orono has continued its efforts to improve responsiveness and the quality of services in 1994. The City Administrator and Police Chief meet monthly with the Spring Park Police Commission to review police activities and to discuss and address concerns. A quarterly meeting of all of the police cities has been held to review police services. A 'precinct sution" has been set up in the Spring Park City Hall to enable officers to make phone calls and complete paper work in Spring Park rather than having to remm to the Orono Police Department office. A policy has been developed which provides direction to the officers regarding the specific reasons an officer can leave Spring Park to respond to a call in another city. A report has also been developed which lists each time a Spring Park Officer leaves the city, the reason, and the length of time. This keeps Spring Park updated regarding its level of coverage and enables the I n I i i! I Tin— .. f..*. Honorable Mayor aikl City Council City of Spring Park June 21, 1994 page 3 Orono Police Department to monitor the police officer activities to ensure a high level oT coverage is maintained. A new Spring Park Police Serv'ice Policy ensures that the Spring Park officers focus their efforts on providing a continuous police presence in Spring Park. Police Department Capabilities The City of Orono and the Orono Police Department have the staff, equipment, and facilities to provide top quality police services and to ensure our responsiveness to Spring Park’s needs and concerns. The following list highlights a number of the strengths of the Police Department. •The Orono police officers have served Spring Park for over twelve years and they are very familiar with the people, problems, businesses, and geography of your community. •Our investigator is very familiar with Spring Park having worked there many years as a patrol officer. •The Orono police officers receive annual First Aid training and have all been trained in the operation of the department’s two Heart-Start defibrillator units. One of these units is always assigned to the City of Spring Park. •The Police Department has a seventeen member police reserve unit to provide extra service during natural disasters or emergencies such as major accidents or fires. The Police Department has four highly qualified part time officers who are I i I Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Spring Park June 21, 1994 page 4 i i \ i scheduled for open shifts to minimize overtime cost5. and are available as additional trained officers in the case of emergencies. The authorized strength is a total of five part time officers. We are currently in a hiring process tor that officer. The Police Department is in the process of reorganizing its patrol supervision to put more officers on the street while improving the supervision of officers. The new police facility meets Federal and State requirements for police facilities which significantly reduces liability risks. The facility also enables more effective processing of prisoners and interviewing of crime suspects and victims. The Police Department has an excellent police records system which enables the Department to provide individualized activity data for each contract city. Orono recently upgraded to a state-of-the art finance and accounting system which will enhance its ability to provide timely financial reports, and will enable the generation of custom reports in response to the needs of the contract cities. The percentage of reported crimes solved is higher tor Spring Park than for Mound, Wayzata, or Orono. (see attached clearance rate table) The City is planning to add a sixteenth (T6th) sworn officer to the department in 1995. This would increase the number of officers providing base coverage from nine (9) to ten (10). The additional officer will improve police services in each of the police service cities. However, because the impact on direct police coverage in Spring Park is very small. Spring Park will not I i I -■- r f ■m ». Honorable Mayor and City C(»incil City of Spring Park June 21. 1994 page 5 9? II bear any costs related to the sixteenth officer. The addition of a sixteenth officer is subject to each of the contract cities renewing the police contract under the current cost alloca»ion formula. Cost to Soring Park The City of Orono proposes to provide police services to the City of Spring Park at a cost of $298,545. This is a $4,745 or 1.62fe increase over the 1994 contract cos» (please see appen^lix A of the police service agreement for deta Is regarding the police budget and cost allocation among the police service cities.) As indicated above the 19 1 contract was a one year agreement to enable the City of Orono to demonstrate a level of service and responsiveness that would enable Spring Park to be confident in entering into a multi-year agreement with the City ot Orono for police sen- ices. The City of Orono believes that a multi-year contract would offer significant advantages to both cities in terms of stability of both police services and budgets. If a multi-year contract is desired it can be in a form in which the budget amouris for each year of the contract are projected as "not to exceed" amount. This would enable the City of Spring Park to plan its budgets several years in advance. However, the City is open to either a multi-year agreement or a one year agreement for 1995. The Police Chief, the entire Police Department and I are committed to meeting and exceeding the expectations of Spring Park regarding top quality police service and responsiveness I 1 n Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Sprii^ Park June 21, 1994 page 6 to Spring Park’s needs and concerns. We respectfully request that the Mayor and Council consider the City of Orono ’s capabilities and commitment to sene aiKi select the Orono Police Department to provide police service in 1995. Thank you for your time and consideration. i Respectfully submitted. Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator f»T.KA»Mlgg RATE The percentage of reported crimes solved is called the clearance rate. Police Departments "clear" a crime by solving who committed the crime. The clearance rate can be used as one measure of how effective a police department has been in solving the crimes that have been reported. The table below shows the learance rate percentages for the Cities of Orono, Spring Mound, wayzata and Long Lake as provided through crime statistics reports from the State Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Part 1 offenses are eight most serious crimes including criminal homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft (felonies), motor vehicle theft, and arson. Part 2 offenses are all other less serious crimes. Some examples are misdemeanor assaults, forgeries, fraud, embezzlement, and buying, receiving and concealing stolen property. Vandalism- criminal damage to property, weapons, prostitution, other sex offenses, narcotic drug laws, crimes against family and children, driving under the influence, liquor laws, disorderly conduct, etc., all other crimes. 1989 1990 1921 1992 Or 6 no Part 1 Part 2 Total 16% 73% 57% 27% 70% 58% 19% 63% 50% 26% 54% 44% 1221 19% 59% 46% Spring Park Part 1 Part 2 Total 25% 83% 58% 21% 78% 58% 35% 80% 64% 34% 67% 56% 24% 74% 56% Mound Part 1 Part 2 Total 20% 52% 39% 30% 65% 54% 19% 61% 46% 31% 61% 51% 29% 61% 49% Wayzata Part 1 Part 2 Total 23% 49% 38% 19% 50% 37% 22% 53% 40% 19% 51% 37% 17% 51% 39% Long Lake Part 1 Part 2 Total 24% 66% 50% 18% 65% 47% 21% 60% 48% 23% 51% 40% 35% 50% 44% *■‘ A'I . AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT THIS AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT made and entered into this _ _ _ _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 19_ _, by and between the CITY OF ORONO, Minnesota and the CITY OF SPRING PARK, Minnesota, is made under and by virtue of Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City of Spring Park is defjiroas of contracting with the City of Drono for the performance of law enforcement services within the City of Spring Park, and WHEREAS, the City of Orcno is agreeable to render law enforcement services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and WHEREAS, a contract such as this is authorized under and by virtue of the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Orono agrees that it will provide law enforcement services for the City of Sprirj Park on the following terms and conditions and the City of Spring Park agrees as follows: 1.Definition of terms. For the purpose of this Agreement, the terms in this Agreement shall have the meanings given to them in this section. A."Contract year" means a 12 month period during which law enforcement services are to be rendered or were rendered to the Contract Cities by the City of Orono. The contract year shall commence on January 1 and terminate on the next December 31. B."Contract Cities" means any city which is a party to this contract or a similar contract which by its terms is interrelated with this contract for the purposes of allocating the total cost for law enforcement services. The Contract Cities are Orono, Long Lake, Minnetonka Beach, and Spring Park. Page 1 --- Q C. "City of Orono Police Budget" shall include all preliminary estimated and actual costs of operating the Police Department of the City of Orono for a given contract year, including but not limited to: 1.All insurance costs including PERA, OASI, Workers Compensation Liability. 2.All Salaries, fringe benefits, overtime. 3.All costs of equipment and apparatus acquisition and maintenance. 4.All non-prosecution consulting fees. 5.Holiday and severance pay. 6.Unemployment benefits paid. 7.Utilities. 8.Telephone Service. 9.Gasoline and oil for police cars 10.Books and periodicals. 11.Wearing apparel. 12.Officer equipment. 13.Rental costs or estimated fair market rental value of building. 14.All other expenses normally and reasonably incidental to the operation of a nine officer. Chief included, police department. 15.Administrative overhead charge of 10% of the City of Orono Base Police Budget to reflect the support provided to the Police Department by the City's Administrative and Finance Departments. Page 2 J-'»S 1 rii—wT m r 2^ Puhlir Tmaae. The designation "Orono-Long Lake-Minnetonka Beach-Spring Park Police Department" shall be affixed to all marked police cars used by the Orono Police Department under the terms of this agreement and the City of Orono shall cause the listing for the Police Department for each Contract City to be inserted in the appropriate telephone directories as may distributed in the contracting cities. If another city contracts with the City of Orono for service, its name may also be added to the above. 3. of .q^rvices. The quality and level of services rendered to the Contract Cities shall be the same as the 3eji^ices rendered to the City of Orono, except as hereinafter stated. A.There shall be the equivalent of two additional officers, who when on duty shall be stationed within the City of Long Lake. These officers will respond to all necessary calls within the Contracting Cities, but their priority will be the City of Long Lake. B. There shall be one officer assigned to, and stationed in, the City of Spring Park 24 hours per day, seven days per week. The officers assigned to provide such service will be physically within the city limits of Spring Park at all times save for the following: 1.Responding to Necessary Calls which are defined as calls created by immediate necessity for police service, such as responding to a medical emergency, a crime in progress, an officer requiring immediate assistance, etc. Such calls will always be a part of the communications log of the Orono Police Department and the officer responding will have been directed by official communication to respond to the Necessary Call. 2 .Scheduled travel to and from the Orono Police Department Offices at the beginning or end of shifts, including the fueling of squad cars or emergency vehicle repairs. Page 3 1 i J r 3 LooDin^ throuoh Oirono 3S 3 psrt of rsgxiXsr patrol patterns for the City of Spring Park The loops that are permitted will have been agreed upon in advance by Spring Park. 4.Transporting prisoners or intoxicated persons to the Orono Police Department, Hennepin County Jail, Juvenile Detention Center, Detox Center, or other locations as necessary. C. The City of Orono will schedule those officers requested by the City of Spring Park at all times, except when not possible due to scheduling problems such as those caused by sick leave or vacation requests. D The City of Orono will provide a monthly tabulation indicating the reasons why officers stationed in Spring were called out of the City. 4 »Hminigrrar<v(^ Resyrinsibilitv.The law enforcement services rendered to the Contract Cities shall be under e sore direction of the City of Orono. subject to the requirements of this contract; the degree of rendered, the standards of performance, Che hiring and d!sc!p!ine of the officers assigned, and other matters -olatLg to regulations and policies, shall remain in the ;;ntrol of the City of Orono. Any disputes between the parties to this agreement as to the extent of functions and ZlTes to be rendered hereunder, or the Lministrator of the City of Orono. disagrees with the resolution, the Contract City y PP within thirty days of receipt of written notice of Che resolution, by giving written notice to 'he /:icy asking for arbitration, as provided in paragraph 17. «« =ity Administrator of the City of * Police, shall submit to the Contract Cities a monthly rep of services rendered to the Contract Cities, as well suggestions regarding any changes chat may be helpful, and Zlllly budget"update. These reports will suLaries for law enforcement services rendered within the Contract Cities. Page 4 V 5. .Tninr. Adv-^nrv Committee. Each Contract City may appoint two volunteer members to a joint advisor^' committee and the name of such appointees shall be furnished to the City of Orono Administration. The Joint Advisory Committee shall meet periodically to discuss and make recommendations regarding concerns or problems identified regarding the provision of police service, and to periodically review budget updates. The Committee will meet prior to August 15 to review and provide input regarding the proposed Police Department budget. Any Contract City may request a meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee. Upon such request, Orono will promptly schedule a meeting. 6 Officers. Employees of the City of QrQPo,..- Officers assigned to duty in the Contract Cities snail be police officers of the City of Orono. The City of Orono shall assume all cbligations with regard to workers compensation, PERA, withholding tax, insurance, etc. arising from the employment of such officers. The Contract Cities shall not be required to furnish any fringe benefits or assume any other liabil-.ty of employment to any officer assigned to duty within the Contract Cities unless a Contract City employs officers directly, independent of this agreement, to provide special law enforcement services in the Contract City. In such event, all obligations and liabilities with respect to employment of special law enforcement officers shall be the complete responsibility of the Contract City. No such direct employment shall be entered into by the Contract City without first obtaining written approval of the City Administrator of the City of Orono which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 7. Fnforcement Policies. Enforcement policies within the City of Orono shall prevail as the enforcement policies within the Contract Cities. The enforcement philosophy and general enforcement polices of the City of Orono shall be provided in writing to the Contract Cities. 8, Enforcement of Ordinances of the Contract; Cities .. The City of Orono officers assigned to duty within the Contract Cities shall enforce the Ordinances of the Contract Cities including without limitation liquor ordinances. Page 5 9. All Officers to be Officers of the Contract The officers assigned duty within the Contract Cities shall be provided authority to enforce the several laws of the Cities by proper action to be taken by the governing councils of the Contract Cities. The Chief Police of the City of Orono shall furnish the names of all Crono police officers to the Clerks of the Contract Cities 10. Offenses. All offenses shall be charged in accordance with the ordinances of the Contract City in which the offense occurred in each case possible, otherwise, the charge shall be made in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota or the laws of the Federal Government. 11.Communications. Equipment and Supplies. The City of Orono shall furnish communication equipment necessary to perform the services which are to be rendered. The City of Orono shall provide the necessary equipment and vehicles and the Ccntract Cities shall provide any necessary supplies which muit be specifically printed for the Contract Cities. 12. Cooperation and Assistance from the Contract Cities. The City of Orono and the Contract Cities shall have full cooperation and assistance from e^ch others officers, agents, and employees. 13. Headquarters. Headquarters for the services rendered to the Contract Cities under the agreement shall be located at offices owned or leased by the City of Orono, and the citizens of the Contract Cities shall notify headquarters, or radio dispatch for services requested either in person or by some other means of communication. Services shall be rendered to the Contract Cities on a 24 hour basis. 14. Cost to the Contract Cities. A. Cost Sharing Formula for the Total Base Cost. For and in consideration of rendition of Law Enforcement services under this agreement, the Contract Cities shall pay total base costs determined by the formula, as illustrated in Appendix A, for each contract year. The factors of the formula, which shall be weighed equally, shall be defined as follows: Page 6 I ■r liHif tm-vfT J£Sl irBa r PopnIatiioP nf Each Contract City: The population of each Contract City computed as of April 1, prior to each contract year from the then most recent Metropolitan Council estimate, except in a census year when there is a new census figure available by August 1st, then that figure shall be used. valu^ of Each Contract City; The market value of each Contract City is the valuation related to taxes due and payable for the year immediately preceding the contract year. The source of the market value data shall be the official figures of the Hennepin County Assessor's Department. Host to Lena T,ake - Additional Manpower^. The cost of additional manpower above the base cost contract to the City of Long Lake, shall be determined as follows: A composite salary amount for the equivalent of two officers shall be computed. To this salary figure will be added a percentage cf the total overtime budget for all officers divided by the number of all officers times the number of specific officers, 88 hours of holiday pay at the hourly rate, wearing apparel, hospitalization, life insurance memberships, workers compensation and pensions calculated at the salary figures above. This total is then added to the total cost per Contract City (net of town aid) for Long Lake to determine cost of service for Long Lake for the new budget year. This procedure is illustrated in Appendix A. It is understood that the City of Long Lake may, due to budget consideration in any contract year at the beginning of the contract year, adjust the number of additional officers in which event they shall pay all those extraordinary costs as outlined in the second paragraph of Section 23 of this agreement. c. rn Sorit^r, p;.rk - Manpower^ The cost of additional manpower above the base contract the City of spring Park, shall be determined as follows: Page 7 W,i i.-*V.V r A salary figure for the provision of one officer assigned to and stationed in Spring Park 24 hours pej^ day, seven days per week shall be computed. To this salary figure will be added that percentage of the total overtime budget for all officers calculated by dividing the number of officers assigned to the City of Spring Park by the number of all officers, 88 hours holiday pay at the hourly ^at*, wearing apparel, hospitalization, life insurance, memberships, workers compensation and pensions calculated at the salary figure above. This total is then added to t.he total cost per Contract City (net of town aid) for Spring Park to determine cost of service for Spring Park for the new contract year. This procedure is illustrated in Appendix A. This co.sc will be an actual cost. It is understood that the City of Spring Park may, due to budget considerations in any contract year, at the beginning of the contract year adjust the level of officers stationed in Spring Park, in which event the City of Spring Park shall pay ail extraordinary costs as outlined in the second paragraph of Section 23 of this agreement. 15. Preliminary Budget Estimate. By August 15 of each year during which this contract remains in effect, the City of Orono will provide a budget estimate for the next contract year. 16.ron^r;.rr Payments. The final estimated costs shall be paid in equal quarterly installments on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of the next contract year by the Contract Cities to the City of Orono. Orono agre to provide the Contract Cities with reasonably detailed .formation relating to its estimated expenditures and its actual expenditures so as to inform them adet^ately of the basis for the calculation of billings made y Under the provisions of this contract, Orono agrees to its records available to the Contract Cities for for the purpose of determining the basis for the calculations by Orono under the provisions of this section. Page 8 i J r I * The City of Orono will provide a monthly budget report to the Contract Cities in such detail as the Cities may reasonably require, including, by line item, amounts originally budgeted and month-to-date and year-to-date expenditures. 17. Arbitration. If the Contract City is aggrieved by the determination of the City of Orono as to the allocation of the actual costs of the prior year's service, the Contract City may appeal said determination within 30 days after receipt of the City of Orono's audit. Said appeal shall be in writing and shall be addressed to the City of Orono asking for arbitration by a board of arbitration.The Board of Arbitration shall consist of three persons; one to be appointed oy the City of Orono, one to be appointed by the appealing Contract City, and the third to be appointed by the two so selected.The name of each arbitrator shall be submitted in writing to the other party. In the event that the two arbitrators do not appoint the third arbitrator within 15 days after receipt of written notice of appointment of either of the first two arbitrators, the Chief Judge of the District Court of Hennepin County shall have jurisdict; jn to appoint, upon application of either the City of Orono or the appealing Contract City, the third arbitrator to the Board. The third arbitrator selected shall not be a resident of either Contract City, and shall be a city manager or administrator. The arbitrators' expenses and fees, together with the other expenses, not including counsel fees, incurred in the conduct of the arbitration, shall be divided equally between the parties to the arbitration. Arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Arb.tration Act, Chapter 572 of the Minnesota Statutes, and any decision shall be rendered within 60 days of appointment of the third arbitrator.Said arbitration shall be binding on both parties. 18.Annual Audit of Actual Costs.The Contract Cities understand and agree that it is impossible to project with complete accuracy the actual costs for labor and equipment as well as the service to be required by each Contract City for the forthcoming contract year, and therefore, agree to a yearly audit to adjust the prior year's estimated contract charge as set forth above to the actual contract charge based upon the actual costs for that contract year. On or before Page 9 April 1 o£ each year, the City of Orono will tabulate the actual cost of providing law enforcement services for the crior contract year and will submit to the Contract Cities a Lmmary of said costs. The actual costs set forth for the prior contract year may result in either a credit or a uebit applied to the estimated police service costs charged to the Contract Cities. If the Contract Cities are still participating in this agreement, and if a credit, one half the credit shall be deducted in each of the third and fourth guarters from the estimated police service cost payments reouired of the Contract Cities for the current year of se^ice- and if a debit, the Contract City shall pay the additional sum to the City of Orono together with the estimated contract charge for the current year by adaing one half of the debit to both the third and fourth quarter payments. The allocation of the credit or debit shall be made puLuant to the same formula set forth above.If the a contract City is not still participating in this agreement at the time the credit or debit amount is determined as sec forth above, the Contract City shall receive from (in the case of a credit) or shall malce Co (in the case of a debit) the City o Orono a cash payment in the amount of such credit or one-half on Che dace chat Che third quarter estimatea police service cost pai-menc would be due if this agreement was still irforce and one-half on the date that the fourth quarter estimated police service cost payment would be due if tt.i agr00ment. was still in forc0. 19 tinf^recasted Rvpendjtures■ Not withstanding any of the above, the Contract Cities shall .-ve the right to approve any officers noT o^hertdsrtncludLtf °he annual budgec^^ Notice of such proposed and non-budgeted capital expen icures an increase in the number of officers shall be given CO Che Contract Cities prior to actual expenditure or items and the Contract Cities shall thereafter have ^e later of their next Council meeting or 30 of said written notice in which to approve and/or the same in writing or else it is agreed that expenditures may be made and the cost chereo - included in that year's budget. In Che event the Cities shall disapprove such non-budgeted and/or increase in the number of officers, it shall Page 10 r I ■ f r * liable to the City of Orono for any costs incurred by the City of Orono should the non-budgetcd capital expenditure and/or increase in number of officers be made despite such disapproval. Furthermore, the cost of such disapproved capital expenditures and/or increase in number of officers shall not be computed in determining the "Base Cost" herein above set forth for each Contract City for the years in which the disapproved expenditure(s) is/are made. 20. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. As part of the Police Budget for each contract year, the City of Orono shall purchase liability insurance to insure the City of Orono against liability incurred in the rendering of law enforcement services to the City of Spring Park. The City of Orono shall maintain insurance covering its law enforcement services with limits of not less than $600,000 for general liability coverage and $2 million for excess liability coverage. The City of Spring Park shall maintain equivalent insurance coverage. Each policy procured by the City of Orono shall name the City of Spring Park as an additional covered party for claims aj*ising out of or related to the provision of law enforcement services. Except to the extent the same are the result of the negligent or wrongful intentional acts of the City of Spring Park, the City of Orono agrees to defend, indemnify and ho^d harmless the City of Spring Park from claims, suits, damages, losses, liabilities and costs however denominated arising out of or related to the provision of lav enforcement services by the City of Orono, its officers, agents, employees and contractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as any waiver by either City of any statutory or common law immunities, defenses, or limits on liability. In no event shall this agreement be construed to fix upon th.. City of Orono any responsibility or liability to Spring Park which is greater or different in kind than the responsibilities and liabilities borne by Spring Park if it was providing law enforcement services through its own police department. It shall not be a violation of this agreement if the City of Oiono, in the exercise of reasonable judgmer Page 11 t Vl i \ !1 MldHPP/. ... r is unable to respond promptly or to respond with only limited officers and equipment, or is delayed in responding to a call. 21.Prior Contract. the contrary, or in credit or debit due Orono on account of enforcement between provided herein for and thereafter. Notwithstanding any language herein to prior contracts between the parties, any to the Contract Cities or to the City of prior agreements and contracts for law the parties shall be payable in 1995 as credit or debit payments payable in 1995 22. Police Contract Service Explanation. The City of Orono will deliver 24 hour patrol and response throughout Orono, Minnetonka Beach, Spring Park and Long Lake; will conduct routine patrol throughout the cities as needed, will conduct periodic security checks of businesses, and will conduct such duties as requested by the Contract City's councils. The City of Orono will submit regular reports to the Contract City officials and appear at council meetings or any c*her special meetings as required by the council. This can be cue Chief or any other member of the department as required by the council. One officer assigned to and stationed in Spring Park 24 hours per day, seven days per week was requested by Spring Park and will be assigned to Spring Park by mutual agreement between the City of Orono Police Department and the Spring Park City Council. The equivalent of two officers were requested by Long Lake and will be assigned to Long Lake by mutual agreement between the City of Orono Police Department and the Long Lake City Council. 23.Duration of Contract and Termination of_Cpntragt^ .^., Notwithstanding language in Section 1 (A) on Page 1; this agreement shall remain in full force and effect from January 1, 1995 until December 31, 1995 and shall be automatically renewed a;mually thereafter for each successive contract year unless terminated by either party by serving written notice upon the City Clerk of all Contract Cities by October first of the current contract year. Page 12 - In the event that a Contract City terminates this agreement, the Contract City agrees to pay to the City of Orono any of the extraordinarv costs incurred by or within the Police Department of the City of Orono on account of such termination unless the termination is for cause. The extraordinary costs include but are not limited to unemployment benefits paid because of the need to lay off existing police department person-el and severance pay as required by union contract. Termination for cause is defined as a material breach of the contract directly related to the provision of police services^ The Contract City will provide a written notice of the alleged material breach to the Orono City Administrator identifying the specific breach, and providing a reasonable time for the City to cure the breach. If the breach is not cured in a timely manner, the termination process will proceed. The determination of whether the reason for the termination is a material breach will be made upon mutual agreement by the parties to this agreement. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, the matter will be submitted to arbitration in the manner provided by paragraph 17 of this agreement. No termination costs shall be imposed unless and until authorized representatives of the parties hereto have met and such termination costs have been mutually agreed upon. In the event the parties are unable to reach agreement, the matter shall be submitted to arbitration as provided in paragraph 17 of this agreement. This agreement may be terminated either by the method indicated in paragraph 1 of Section Ha, or by mutual agreemen of all Contract Cities. If any one of the Contract Cities terminates 'his agreement, the remaining Contract Cities may terminate or renegotiate the agreement. “ig:ti:“o‘;':rerp:rt7 to the time that such termination becomes effective. Page 13 T A r »~v^fi'wr niw I department. It is understood that the formula for allocation and the distribution of costs will be calculated yearly as illustrated in Appendix A. 24. Mo niscrimination. The City of Orono agrees that during the period of this contract, it will not, within the State of Minnesota, discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, or ancestry and will include a similar provision in all subcontracts entered into for the performance hereof. This paragraph is inserted in the contract to comply with the pj-Q^isions of Minnesota Statutes Section 181.59. CITY OF ORONO CONTRACTING CITY City Administrator Clerk City of Spring Park Mayor Mayor A The above agreement was reviewed and approved by the City Council of the City of by Resolution No. _ _ _ _ _ datedby Resolution No. »19 The above agreement was reviewed and approved by the City Council of the City of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _by Resolution No. - - - - - - - - dated _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _* 19_ _• Page 14 I i ■ ■4? ■._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OMMIO rOLtCS SWVICf COtlTMCT BASE BUDCrr FORMULA FACTORS BODCrr TIAR 1»9S APPBMDIX A P09SBUD1 . .1^ 'Vr 'r . P*-.-. .'4 OROHO LONS LARS NIMMBTOHXA BRACK "'•K-iJ' .. '■ FOFOLATXOV % or TOTAL nSOHT 50% 7,303 €2.72% 31.3€% l«9tS 17.13% §.S7% 612 S.2€% 2 €3% SPRINO PAiUC TOTAL 1,734 14.in 7.4S% U,«44 100.00% so .00% NMUsr vAun % OF TOTAL $€$§•911,700 $91,660,900 $§9,127,100 $57,371,500 |§77,07$,200 75.13%10 45%7.$$%€.54%100.00% p r t.i CITY OP OROMO POLICE SERVICE CONTRACT BODOET YEAR 1995 POLICE DEPARTMENT EXPENSES 1995 SALARIES - REQDLAR OVERTIME - REGULAR SALARIES > P.T. OFFICERS SALARIES - TEMP CLERICAL HOLIDAY PAY (LELS) PEER - CITY CONTRIBUTION FICA/MDCR • CITY CONTRIBUTION HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE IMSORAMCE NCHUan COMPENSATION INSURANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES MOTOR FUELS fc LUBRICANTS CLOTHIMO & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT BLDG A GROUNDS MAR SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS A ACCESS BOOKS A PERIODICALS TRAINING SUPPLIES pfVBf program LEGAL CONSULTING SERVICES OT HER CONSULTING SERVICES TELEPHONE POSTAGE PRINTING/PUBLISHING/ADVERTISING UTILITIES RADIO RENTAL OFFICE A BUILDING RENTAL MAIMT - OFFICE EQUIPMENT HAINT - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT NAIHT - MISCELLANEOUS EQUII MAIMT - BLDGS A GROUNDS JANITORIAL SERVICES DATA PROCESSING SERVICES MEETINGS-CONFERENCES-SCHOOLS GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE PROPERTY INSURANCES UMB1EI.TA LIABILITY INSURANCE INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD MEMBERSHIPS TRAVRL'NILEAGR* PARKING MERTIMG EXPENSES LICENSES A TAXES OTHER CHARGES BUILDINGS A STRUCTURES OFFICE FURN'FIXT-EQUIPMENT AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT OTHER EQUIPMENT POST TRAINING RBIMBURSB SCHOOL L1AIS(»I OFFICER REIMS TOTAL $1,237,440 APPENDIX A PD9SBUD2 $725,460 19.000 14.500 6.820 24.300 85.800 8.170 61.220 4.400 33.970 7.000 24.000 10.000 500 4.000 1.000 2.000 1.800 1.000 7.000 7.700 1.500 2.600 9.000 17.000 43.500 3.400 17.500 2.500 1.000 6.000 26.090 9.270 10.378 8.633 7.581 1.326 1.230 650 1.000 180 100 500 1.500 30.000 2.500 (6.000) (11.138) >>>>>>>> i >x _.Tr4P^u.»e3r.i:-i!r *1. m-in-n&>W'I"'wf-LGM U^Ct ADOITIOMia. MANPONBRIffS 8IRVICI YIAR■nXBIT Cm. ■'l^ 'vM:' V^12.! froj«ct«d 8al«riM« 2.0 Officers Overt iM ■ollday Pay8.8.8.A. - city Contribution nCA/MDOt • City Contribution ■aalth • Life Insurance Norker cosyensstlon Insurance g.v^?.Clothing a Personal Iqulpnsnt P'v' VOsduet Town Aid Credit total Additional Officers iif w total oase Cost total Cost of 8erviceti.. I' Ip-iiM :•• mm - SsHlaterfv<* y*V -.—■ PD95BUD3 APPENDIX A$83,2002,5003,52010,171450 7,464 4,030 650 $111,985 <10,500) 101,485 129,598 $231,083 SPRING PARK ADDITIONAL MANPONBR 1995 SERVICE YEAR EXHIBIT DProjected Salaries, 4.0 OfficersOvertimeHoliday PayP.B.R.A. - City Contribution PICA/KDCR - city Contribution Health - Life Insurance Worker Compensation Insurance Clothing 4 Personal ■qulpmant Total Deduct Town Aid Credit Total Additional Officers Total Base Cost Total Cost of Service P09S1$166,400 1Si5,0007,040 ,'j20,342 •J900114,928 18,068 -4 1,300 1 ^ -j >$223,970 (21,000) 202,P70 95,878 $298,848 M ■■"I ■-r* m -.v ■m ■'i-i ■s:. V .^v. _ _\j:. -.. . -r' ._.._ ----- t� '�--H , t< 1-I -,, � I 6 r-•a ; ' "'--- ---- L,MIEJ± ...... • 1 B 40DO C ---0 ,ro E ._ F aiao G .., H _, I W-N J .., K _, L .. -- COUNGiL JUN 2""•1AGDmA FOR COUNCD. MEE,e.G SET roa MOP ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 2780 KEl,J,EY PAI (•) Asierist icam are coasidem1 to be routine items to be a Couacil under tbe Comeac frem• oa me 11Cnda- mrm""' re available in tbe Public Pactet which ,nay be obtlioed 1.1poa rec ROLL CALL •1. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF '.\ONUTES• 2. Regular Mfttiq or Juac 13. 1994 PARK CO�USSION CO�L\lE:\'TS PLAA'lNING CO�'L\IISSION CO�L'IE:'t'TS -C.tndace Ro.afle1 PUBLIC COl\oL\IL�S -(Liffljt 5 �linuta Per Ptrsoa• AUDIT REPORT 3.Presenwion oy Auditor -1993 Corupreheasave Finaoc;Oeltjenbnu1s POLICE CHIEF REPORT 4.Oran Spring Putc 199-S C0ntnet Propo�l Z0�1NG AD�fINJS'TRA TOR'S REPORT ••APPLICANTS •• Immediately ifter the Councu bas rthe three (3) ontinaj resolutiom at tinot exccuse resolutions for subdivw S.ll9l5 George Appleeaum. 4109 Highwood Road -Vari.al6.11933 Tandem Properues. 1645/3025 Watertown Road • I7.11936 Charles E. Troru. 1525 Kelley Aveaue -V&l'WICl8.11939 Timothy Offen. �25 Tvmbam Road • Vanaocc - R,9.1994 Maria& Liceascs • L..aJces1de Manna G�ylesMarina MA YOR/COUNCU. REPORT ENGINEER REPORT CITY ADMINLffRATOR'S REPORT Ff.;,"' 10.DesipllliDs a New Locaaor. foe Preanct 14 Pollinl Locat11.Requesc to Odele Sewer ASIISP-WH OD Tu forieic Loe b0-.r12.Oaanoar ICnuuo-i R.etimnem -Raolulioo of Apprec-ilcioll13.Uone-nwm Dctoc,ma , ' I h I Ml L" vi ■T. .^'■v *«; ’’ f h. -r ' I i *.»»* cJUKOLEim::: JUN 2 7 I9M CnVITMOMREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 22, 1994 ITEM NO.: ^ Dqurtment Approral: ftaac Jeame A. MibiMb Title puiidiqg A Zooinf Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Afcnda s. .. « »» tylilM Item Description: #1913 George ^iplebaiim, ' Cootimaikm of Revi^ • Resohi it I Status of AppHcatl At the June 13. 1994 to affect a vote of actioii. Mt in attendance. The appikatk I r^ t M.'_ of the Council, four members in attendance were unable ibers then voted to table the application until a fell Council was has been it>scheduled before Council at the June 27th M - t I I I As of this writing, the City has received no new information fe I II■ I« 'applicam. The original pockets for the June 13th meeting have been recopied for your convenience. Pleaae advise staff prior to the meeting if additional information b needed to assist you in ig your final recommendatkm.i|M 111 vl F'r f CRYOrORONO P.O. BoK^i Cryital Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPUCAT10N NO. #1915 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Mcof Notkc: May 25. 1994 TO:Geoiie Appkbaum 4109 Higbwood Road Mound, MN 55364 type OF APPLICATION: Variai DATB OF MEETING: June 13. 1994 VOTE: 4 POR 0 AGAl COUNCfl* ACTION - MOTKW: Ttei four I « 1 «. I M -II •. Wit to taWc all review of your appUcatioo until a M Council Is in tttcndai Council was uaabk to affect a final vote of The Your applicatkMi has t orifinal padDEtt have h rc rhrdiilrri befoie the Council at foeir Jhne 27th lecopied for their review. I • - r ting. The Please ny ofBce if you have any ftifdier ^ n V- X A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (Q, SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2, SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (2) FILE NO. 1015 WHEREAS, George AppletMum (teieinifter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4109 Highwood within the CiQr of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lots 17 and 18, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesott (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the qiplicant has applied to the CiQr for variances to Municipel Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (Q to permit structural improvements that will result in 2,662 s.f. or 16.6% of structural coverage where only 15% is allowed; per Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) seeks approval of side and street setback variances for a second story ddition to be located 16* ftom the street lot line where a 35* sett»ack is required and a garage lition that would be located 9* from street lot line where a 35* setback is requited and where a 3.5* setback eaists and located IW from the side lot line where a 10* setback is required and where a 3* setback exisu; per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 seeks approval of hardcover variances within the 75*250* setback area where 3,423 s.f. or 41.5% exists and where 3,557 s.f. or 43.1% is proposed and where 25% is allowed; and per Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (Q (2) seeks approval of setback variances from the defined top of the bhiff requiring a 30* set^k where the garage is proposed at 20*; a cantilevered second story at 8*, grade level addition at lakeside is 12 ’ and a lakeside deck at 6W. III 1. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City CouncU of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1915. The property is located in the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 15,965 s.f. or .36 acres. Page 1 of 6 L 3.The Orooo Planning Commission reviewed this application on April IS, 1994 and May 16, 1994 and lecommended approval of the variances as amended t»ased upon tlie foUowiiv unique findtngs and haidshtps: A. B C. F. O. I. The 15,965 s.f. or .36 aero property is subject to standards for a one acre loning district The proper^ has severe topographic limiuttions that consist of a bluff area requiring more additioiial restrictive setback standards. The existing residence has existed on the property for over 40 years pnor to the development of current shoretaml managemeoc standards. More gentle sloped areas to the tear or north of the property have resulted in structures being placed at a substandard setback from the street but this has been found to be consistent with the pattern of development for ail residential construction along Highwood Road. The proposed improvemetus will not encroach the average lakeshoro sedMck line creating visual impact for existing residences on adjacent properties. Hardcover within the 0>75* setback area will be reduced by 1,371 s.f. or 17.7%. 2,510 s.f. or 32% hardcover exists on the properly and 1,139 s.f. or 14.7% is proposed. The existing detached garage is located 3* from the side and street lot lines. The proposed garage addition win be located 9* from the street lot line and 7W from the side lot line. The proposed improvements will at the lakeside of the residence. result in the alteration of the bluff The existing plantings and vegetation on this property will provide for tdeqv*^ screening for the expaision of structure closer to the top of bluff. Page 2 of 6 ,, r__ r •, H- - The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or otter danger to neighboring property: would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty: is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant: and would be in teeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of tte CiQr. 5.Tte City Council has consideted this application inchidiog tte findings and tecommendatioiis of tte Planning Commission, reports by CiQr staff, coirunents by tte and tte effect of tte proposed variance on tte health, safety and welfare of tte community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of tte above findings, tte Orono CiQf Council hereto grants variances to Municipcl Zonirig Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C), Sectioo 10.22, Subdiviskm 2, Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (2) to permit tte construction of a garage addition, a second story, and grade level addition involving tte conversion of an 18* x 18.9* deck, 6.8* x 18* addition at tte southeast comer of residence and an approximate 10* x 18* lakeside deck as shown on tte site plan included as P^ ge 6 of this resolution, subject to tte following * 1 All land alterations resulting from tte proposed new constructioa shaU be subject to standards set forth in Section 10.56, Subdivision 6 (B) governing erosion control, preserving existing vegetatkm for tte screening of structures and otfier facilities as viewed from tte surface of Lake Minnetonka. 2.Applkam shall complete all existing hardcover improvemems as shown on P^ 6 of this resolution prior to tte footing inqwctkm by tte Orono BuHdirtg Department. Hardcover within tte 0-75* setl^k area shall be niamtained at 1,2139 s.f. or 14.7% and within tte 75-250* setback area at 3,557 s.f. or 43.1%. 3.Authorities granted by this resolution tun with tte property not with tte applic^. but are penntssive only and must be exercised by applicatk>:!i for a buildi^ permit within one year of tte date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 13, 1995). Page 3 of 6 1 I t: 'y ' ■ Ir P-" p. rV hr P 4.vkodc t.SdT'S'SSiw Ml •. 5. ^ ■■-.--..--^K^.^ indBiiooiliiiilliewtyMWWiogWWnM KIStaSLlSi 0. bd-lf of htaself. to to». «Kce«on «n<, .«p». I^ftby agrees to the recofding of thw re» pfopeity. Mil kekt 00 Adopted liy Hie City Council of the City of 27th day of lune. 19M. •.Mil HI -f ataregularm--til ATTEST; Edwaid J. Callahan, Jr, Mayor ity Ow STATE OF MINNESOTA ) > la. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) |T 4«IH M - City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 j i \ I k. M Pm f'.'v ‘ ' 7** r- b h -V ■■ [ ’■■:t cmr of ORONO m RESOLimON OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO______________ STATE OF MINW^TA ) ) ». COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____diy of , 199_ bcf jre me a Notify Public within andforsaidcou^pcnw^in and who executed the foregoing intmimeoLaiKl wtedged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) ftee act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of___, 199_ before me a Notaiy Public within and for said county* personally appeared iwn to to be person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument*and wledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) $s. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of___, 199__ before me a Notar> Public within »*mrmbe*Sp^ in and who executed the foregoing ii»strumcnt*and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed NOTARY PUBUC Page 5 of 6 i r r “l". V FOR S3 roa.’itStttan M»i#£50U MO \W»\^ hUKTii lUrtVCYINO INC tov.- rfrfC«WH SI M C i.i.u ?■ ;Caw C • ■ - —iAi— 0 • l(iCi4 i^OMUMCNT «eAKiriij^ AilC Oil AJI OAfVii lots 17 & 18 HIGHWOOD LAKE MINNETONKA. HENNEPIN COUNTY. CjOUt5\T\OHt3'‘ aAV.QcO'^dfc c .a *as »u ^ts€»m^ MINNESOTA a 2 » kiiEoiaaE.?- re* I k P REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 8. 1994 ITEM NO.: DcpanIII .< 11 Approval: M^busth Tide BttUding A Zoniof Admioisuntor Administrator Reviewed:Afcnda Zoning Descrii #1914$ George Applebaum, 4109 Highwood Rood - Variii Resohiti(m Review of Pertinent Ordinancei 1.Seetkm 10.03. Siibd. 14 (C) • Lot covenge Total lot aiea “ 15.90S s.f. Allowed » 2,394.75 $.f. or 15% Existing * 1,654 s.f. or 10.4% Original proposal “ 2,767 s.f. or 17.3% Amended proposal » 2,662 s.f. or 16.6% Variance " 267.25 s.f. or 1.6% 2.Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B) • Setback variai A.Sec for additions to principal stnictuie. B C. floor level - street setback. Requited » 35’ Existing = 16* Proposed - 16* Variance * 19* or 54% Attached garage addition - street setback. Required « 35* Existing » 3.5’ (detached garage) Proposed » 9* Variance « 26* or 74% Attached garage • side setback. Required » 10* Existing » 3* Proposed » 7.5* Variance » 2.5* or 25% i € ruV;.-,- - ' *'V ' v V :>-r' %■' >: -V I-.' Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 4 June 9, 1994 #1914 George Applebaum. 4109 Highwood Road 3.Section 10.22, Subd.2 • Review of hardcover. 0-75* setback aiea » 7,720 s.f. Existiiv e 2,510 s.f. or 32% Proposed * 1,139 s.f. or 14.7% Reduction in hardcover * 1,371 s.f. or 17.1% 75-250* setback area * 8,245 $.f. Allowed “ 2.061 s.f. or 25% Existiiv « 3.423 s.f. or 41.5% Original Proposal = 3,804 s.f. or 46.1% Amended Proposal » 3,557 s.f. or 43.1% Hardcover increase « 134 s.f. or 1.6% Variance “ 1,496 s.f. or 18.1% \ Sectkm 10.56, Subd. 16 (Q <2) • Setback variances from top of bhilf.I 11 *lif'• «I n ;•] IGarage Required » 30* Existing * 35* Proposed « 20* B.Overhang - East side Existing =- 15* Proposed « 8* C.Principal structure addition at lakeside. Existing ** 18.8* Proposed - 12’ Deck. Existing * 16.5* Proposed » 6.5* List of Exhibit A • Application B - Plat Map I ; ) 4 .1 r Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 4 June 9. 1994 #1914 George Apfrtebaum, 4109 Highwood Road C •Property Owners’ List D •Neighbor ’s Acknowledgement Forms E -Average Lakeshoie Setback Line F •Existing Survey G - - M ♦ I. Existing Topographic H-1-2 Lot Covenge Facts I •Staff Sketch-Top of Bhiff J-1-3 Karrlcover-Exis 1)Key 2)0-75* 3)75-250 ’ K-1-3 Hardcover-Pr 1)Key 2)0-75* 3)75-250* Elevations i L - M - Floor Plans Brief Review or AppUadi The Planning Commission reviewed the multiple variance application at their April and May meetings. Improvements consist of a 24* x 24* attached garage, a second story, a main floor addition involving the enclosure of the existing 18* x 18* deck, a 6’ x 18* addition at the southeast comer and an approximate 18’ x 10' deck at the lakeside. The improvements result in an increase of 1.008 s.f. of structural coverage requiring a lot coverage variance of 267.25 s.f. or 1.6%. The existing house does not meet the required setbacks fhmi the street which requires setback approvals for the second story. The existing detached garage shall be replaced by an attached garage that would be located 9*. The original detached prage was 3Vi’ from the street lot line. The original garage was 3’ from the side lot line and is now proposed at 7V6* still requiring a side setback variance. Review Exhibit E. note all improvements will be located well behind the average lakesbore setback line. Review Exhibit 1. Staff has sketched the lop of the bhiff at the lakeside of the property. All improvemenis will encroach the required 30’ sedMck from the top of bhiff but none will impact the bhiff as all alterations will te set back from the top. In the original proposal, a portion of a walkout was shown but was denied by the Planning Commission as they would not consider any disturbance of the bluff. The a|q>licam was advised of the special standards required per code for all construction within a bluff area, noting special erosion control and _ r I t Request for Council Action continued pige4 of 4 June 9. 1994 . „ . #1914 George Applebeum. 4109 Highwood Road screening. new hardcover. topographies may create a potential for erosion. Staff has enclosed the memos for the May and April meeting and Councitanrasbm nuy wish to review the minutes of these meetings. Planning Commission ’s recommendation, including the hardships and special conditions of that approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution; OR To deny the amended proposal (:■ i rf: Vi I iqi^4 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE AFPLICATI loitial AppUcadoo Fee $200.00 ($30.00 per each additioDal variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original a{^lication) Variance for non-conforming stnicnires $200.00 AAer-che-Fact Fees (Double application fee) # 1. 9 1 D PROPERTY INFORMATION ^ Site Address 4VOS lUvcUV-Ci^C^_______________ Property Uenrificatioa Number fP.l.D.) -COVS________ Attach legal description to applicatkg^ if not included on required survey. Date Pwnp^qv AfMpitied (montfa/year) I (do) (^n^ also own the adjacent parcels of land CITY OF FIHMCC OFFICE 1^0200000 fOi CDt 250.00 Cfm JL 2^.00RECEIPT~7Hm YOU 0299130 cool ROl U3:3c ----------- OX'lS/9^ Present usTofproperty: )C residential Zoniiv District: other (speciiy) APPLIC Nam P! FI Mg (home) A-\'l.-VL'\^ (wadO AJilww: AVO^V js Ci«y;_CaSiaa OWNER (if different than applicant) Name______________ ) f -(work) Address:City:Zip: OESCRlPnON OF REQUEST EstimaiedCoMttuctionCost$ VOO^POQ^ Describe request indetail:^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width ^ Hardcover Lot Coverage ^ Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakesbore Other (specify) hardship /description of UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hawrf«hip or practical diffU^ty or unusiuil property conditions preventiiv with Zoning Code requirements: ^ B - ^T^omBc. I r<-U:Tv^»: (attach additional sheets if necessary) r ;h r \ G> REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AU of the foUfflwiM intomprion must bf submitted l>Y tlW iPPli for TOUT afiplicatiop to be coaiidcrtd COffIPittel 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ^ CoDtplctcd AppIicfttioDFonn ^ *• •• ^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obcam this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603. Govt Center. 348-3271).5 5sr»7r.s. as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8Vi x 11 for SmboIuc survey (exijiing and proposed etevations) if any >“‘^i*!*"* S™!* ~ areMoposed. fa additkm. provide <me (1) copy 8W-x ir for leprod^ w-Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8 A x 11 ). ” List of the legal names (include marital status) of aU persons with an interest m the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). __As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please xaaxmv ™ : jg ^nrm.»nwAU^Urn is not compigte If the above InformaliMi ti» iwt Pttn iiKni«Q« APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE k« The aiTffl^*"* hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Axli!!^«.r .p«a ID MX,yldiik»iBl fee (ittff time not covettd ly origml te md/or coonluid expeofe^Hliro^ review of this application, and certifies dial the Urforniatioii supplied iVtroe wV tP ® -------------Applicant's Signatu Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE .. The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this applicaticm and fti^ entry onto the propetirby CjW4»9» consultants, agents. Commission members, and Councu members for purp^ of/^vwtig|^n and verification of this request Owner*s Sig>at JdCouocfl. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make aita^ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 79.CO RE 3 399.57 R£3 GCVT LOT 5 JL^. ■c ^rr'*: . ..65^*♦ ,• ;s; T_// •' .•?.' T. / ' V ^ tr £ - * •A I ^ - 1., >>.>'7 -^/ • e /^63/ ^ -y // , mm DAH 0S/0I/9AMTCN OOi«j■rt!•P«M» AOM•MNn NAMfA«<PAYIIIHAM/AOM••!OMWII NAHiTAWAVfRNAIC/AOMAOMOMCA NAHETAXPAYER NAME/ADOR MOP AOOR (RfCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR M 07-U7-ES 44 001104001 HICMHOOO ROP L JOMNSON I 0 L FOSSFREDERIC JOHNSON4001 NIOHNOOO ROHOUND NN S5S44SO 07>117>tS 44 001404101HIOHNOOO ROCHARLES E DA HARTHULIAN 0 DRICKLEY4101 HIOHNOOOHOUND HN S5S44SO 07-117-tS 44 OOSO04140 NIOHNOOO ROJ 0 CUSACK t C H ORACEC ORACE A J CUSACK0140 HIOHNOOO RO HOUND 101 B5S44 SO 07-117-tS 44 OOSS 04100 NXONNOOO RO 0 A 0 OAXTER OAVtO C A OEORA J OAXTER 4100 NIOHNOOO ROAD HOUND m S5S44 HEM«PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEMPROPERTY 0»04ERS LISTSO C7-117>23 44 001204049 HIONHOOO ROOLLXS L NELSON ETALALONZO 0 SERAN XIX4099 HXGHHOOO ROHUUNO HN 55344SO 07-117-23 44 001504109HIOHNOOO ROOEORGE N APPLEOAUHGEORGE APPLEOAUH4109 HXGHHOOO ROHOUND HN 5534438 07-117-23 44 003104132 HXGHHOOO ROSCOTT 0 A CATHERINE ANDERSONSCOTT 0 A CATHERINE ANDERSON4132 HXGHHOOO ROAD HOUND HN 55344 SO 07-117-23 44 0034 04104 HXGHHOOO RO GAO SAUER GLEN A OEVERLV SAUER 4104 HXGHHOOO PO HOUND m 55344 PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR TOTAL OATCH 005 00012 r- REPORT NO.PAGE PI4S540115TO 07-117-23 44 001304101HXGHHOOO ROEVA THEOOALOEVA A THEOOALO4101 HZGNNOOO ROADHOUND TM 5534430 07-117-23 44 001004149HXGHHOOO RDLARRY N KARKELALARRY N KARKELA4149 HZOHNOOO ROHOUND HN 5534430 07-117-23 44 00S204114HIOHNOOO RDORUCK J HOLUNIYPHIL OTTO4140 HIGHNOOD RO HOUND HN 55344 SO 97-1X7-23 44 0004 04125 HXCHNOOO RO JOHN N A ROOERTA J HENRXCH JOHN N A ROOERTA J HENRXCH 4125 HXGHHOOO RD ORONO »tl 55344 :,r-!• • U •V?,'?.V,"^1 iVtVs''I'- -IK- I- 'v4' m * '-f-i {\» }-y ■ .i-r- t f -ml . , .. ., ... \ I ' . ,'" ·, .•. ' .. .i' . ", ,·) • . . • .... ' ,: . J 9 .. . ; \ ' -· � =.. �' -·. ..,. : � ' I '.. '.'· I ' ; . �J • • ... , ..... ' •· ., . t ' .' ' t ... ,. •I ·., , .. r· r ... DlTI OJ/01/M IAT'Ctl 001 - -• • H£tNPIN COUffY PROPEAn INFOAHATlON SYSTE" PROPERTY �RS lIST UPC» HD. ,AGE l CEllTIFV THAT THE FACTS HPltESENTED lllE AN ACCUIATI AND �llEPHSINfATlOH Of lNFOllttATIDN AS JT APHlllS THIS DlTE GN THE ltECOIIDIOf Tifl HEtMPJN COUfTY !'IEPAIITNENT OF PHPEITY TAXATION, TO TIii MSTOf NY -EDGE -9fllff:Lt_ 1 MOO· o,ril(!!l!fl av :Itta '4 ; r • ' � '.. .I' r , ,• . •.. '• I ·,....• .'• I ' t . ' '.... . , � I . . ' . •, ' ... � t., 1 I • . \ ., ._l" r ' !'‘W-'' ;'■ ';-r’'^^li# •W. i'. wi'*''m^ ^ IiW’ 1 F- yx V.- M .ii if hi* -1 :'$i " ^ ^ IW *1 hfyrr^' * •’ :-J ®-?ai,. i*»- »"•!■; f '■.r ■; wffS^ffgBP MJUtt- a i vi ? ii I i--'5 m:m%!»• .>4: '«- I ■ :VV , Vfc ■.>•••'' ! * 'X-i f .J ft'iji >:-.r y M'w. m #1915 A4JaccBt Property Ownen* Ackaowtcdfencot Form 1 (we) JShu W. ifUuttk,J7Jlenrich of ^i^yioeJ Hi tnrim nsmeri^l fprioC adaiCfSl(print have reviewed the plai» tof the propoeed improvenieni or propoied use of the propeiqr loceied at4iC<R also referred » as Land Use Application No._______ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. 1 (we) am (are) not asked declave approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Cduoeil ttet 1 (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neigT^ pvQlIcct or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Owner Date WM- I (we) (print name(s))(print address) have reviewed the plans the propose d imptovement or proposed use of the property iocassd at4VC<v VUuiu^^^gA^ also refitned so as Land Use Applkaiion No._______ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledicmcat. 1 (we) am 0 declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to Council that I (we) am (are) aware of dw improvement pians and that the pr pra^ or uae requites crounett approve?. J) d U •CR.W Property Owner "V-_ /7- JV Dale Proper ty Owner If yon have any indoe Dole ( I. < ■ 1 i 'may asaiii the City in the review of this Land Use 10 the Buddie A Zom^ Office at least todays prior 1915 Miss "Rl lariaiaMail 41 iniNkv*iMM ntn mniMjimttmtf wnmtMmST «N Mrvill Ml mf-AMW r «Mi* VM? 9 IM IIMC «f mmmiMlA. IMl# ^ 4^W •4«at MrrciiMM tTMi? m.t, tmjimm NtMMf • mmucmia MUMtSOTA ^UCAHTMATIOM MO. lWlt3 ^*1 < ^ S > Ah.K.<L VL«MKiQUTO>KkM.M..^ Ha%JMeP»M CouuTV, ^ VCu • VT / tATC^ •CA^f 1*4 o#inMi M OtAOMIOt AM M AM Ufc Appikaiioo No. I (we) MU (iie) 3/iM H am 4 ■or I (Wt) Ml <■•) Ml mM «> tai Minijr to coallm for Qljr fl '4 L* ^ M '.'7 7-7 V' MCiqr iA foi U m lOAqrtprfor #• V- vr R[B f Irr· AS P E A,, £0 8 I E. Ml 'vP S I 1 IH[ LOTS 17 & 18 HIGHWOOD ' LAKE MINNETONKA HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA w V) .J 0 .'.I: l lj <( <( 0 y> (j '() . . .. . l 11 •: l I I •; l J ' .' • • 1 •H),1 '1 I· H J ) I/ • i, <_)L ll I.' B I •I 1, l T S ( t, I 2 ' r , ... • I ' • •I.l CDN D \ T\ ��'I ,� \J> \. V' I 'o .,. . , ., . I.HOODoEC" . .• I O r E A s I 4 CP (J) -l () ' A E ,\ H I ,'3 SU. 0 I �(__�u£ " ' . I J J D ID I IN t9'1VI , •tTI� .-. I AN io I �Q�-(' i flits af- Ttlj; Sl>T^OF ^MINNESOTA. KUK H hUKVLYING.INC ■100„> jf.rPERSON ST N E COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MN 55-121 (612)788 9/'f.9 tax (612) 788-7602 BEARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM O MINNESOTA RE6 s L5J^a T I ON NO \<,»U3 GY'-bl mCr^ GHWOOD 'JNETON \oH--------1\M Pl£UT V \ . ' ----____ .,_ .__.,,�--� .: a_��-.. k,\\o .. '2_1'L �L �le · w.::-0. . . (5--... � � L (a u-.2 l � ..4-<,i IY-a 1-Ill c.i.L,-\ --�\o, k_\J - � --� . 1; ·,-..\� ,U . . \.\. \J..: &) . . lo ( --o-,�'-) (c0 (M��� �D \ '-0.-) ·--\ '-<:::,-�s\.o {:_cl. c-) -�, �-cr-...J �-�-�-r.:T' �� �.'\S �� -�s \ � .\o-'l l- � \ -�\)]o S8: ·o-.S�--c_, - ("2_(2)0 \ GCk I HtfitBY Ci ■<»Ab PRFPAAR AND THAI I LAHA of Th{^ LOTS 17 & 18 HIGHWOOD ' --.,. -._ , • \ • • -, 1 ; -t 1 I V l"li'I ., / -• 1 , \ \ I W 1 LO\'-\ b \ 'T \ �uR \-\ 0 <-D 't L R C.. A LC.. u L Ao.\\ 0 ...J, ':, LAKE MI NNETO��KA. HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA -- w V) ::> 0 :r yqc,;;,y• , ..,., .. ,vv1.v · l¥'1YVV •• y" 9 . OTE: IN D HO� RE I Lt.J <..? <:{ er <:{ (::> I' I f -- I -: I DCO ER r HE -RE S , E VJ IT I Of TOSTI u<:Tur<-S 0 THIS URE ·0> (j .. \ ... . . 'O \ L\J ()· . .. . . . . .. .. . ':, .. ·• .. • �· 1-'-. • • . •• . ,, . . . (,J •• •• ' . . .' . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ...·• .•: � .. ·• •. . . . . . . .... . . ' . .. ••• _.···· ... •·····1 () . . ,. .· : .. , : : . .. @ .... ····' .. -···.----. , ..,. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . 0 i.o t --+-\ f--il I I ::, % H/w^iIjCOVFH OlLCUbUlOfI HORK.^lIhlT -- I ufijACK 2G;j£: (ciHCLE ohe) (1H^ Z‘J-250' 250-500' b'OO'-iOOO' £.(i:iii(iG llAr.ucuvCK in Zone*.________________________________^--5• 6VA\^GT ^^^ Ai • \-Aoo*i?G 12>. <C. .\^C.\m6 vs(/^'i t). •# Asi<2cst) fc'1 AvHO t^'iCAC Q.O t>-\6?^ Total HAnDcoven in Zone Total Propeaty A rea in Zone ’V*< ,_ A o-w ^ LENiJIH WilJTII • . ,,.,,_ . .. X , , _ _ ..=M //\ 1 , ,_______X .„._ .. __= U./\. . -:. .x_= Aoo , X _ _ ___. X _..bS^S , . ino -.- --X ^______\ GO o :;.F. s.p. S.F •I I •r • I r * AC>-ftl 0»5^<^e\.7T\ MfO^'X V\00^ Cs © CQK4CC.e"\ Vs4 ^N^V<. exjc.^ vrci'96 »-AO 4\NCk.\i0w^ ^jr'w V AiUor4C5k co*^i ^ vO<5 VSAUX IftO X . . X _1)oIf..- X X \il1X .,\ 61 . X .\■51 < 50 X 1 -X ^[TjL.»•\ s V . A uo MGi CC?MC ^ ^lOuv^A'-^ Vi>s*twOCS /C^! A.UOML-i VhoP 2.P, l'^::3' 52.0 I-P £Scuo Kv .t ^uoK.« cofsic- KU^I or- K'2'OTl >^cTA»MVM^>y n X &oai I O c c \AwwoJi>« -jr^uujC -—- ■■— ■i*r.—. wA*-'- ;.F, © /<7r) Kuh *3Toku .F.vi-V R(;TA\mMCi, vj ; h I \ ..IZziQ. , S.F.lMC»-OV>2.t» ^>V4*S‘.' t. 17 S.F.B o *f fl m GO X100 }4C>T(>:wor DclUMGAT«fr>LGt^GnTH )« vs »D TH VsiTR.vJ PLAi<A\KeTESZs<cC> OFA C.ONVf»oTe C/Xt>D P^Za ^C s^C.a K/A IB X X „\iS • ^ X 30 1.1^ \Z-X n,^i? - ..a (* »X \\ \i •# -X s X s X ow X X s. X ow • • X ••5. X S.i X • • . S.F X •• m ••• S.F X . •• S.f• \H fianbCUVF-H C/lLCLIUtTION KOfiX-Jn EET L£ii;Ac..< zo.i£; (cihcle Qtll) U*7E'(T^^1)^ 25U'-500' bOO-iOOJ' 3^ £,<i:i n<(j HAf(uc(jvi:/{ in 7uh £!'^^<^cct?/wn -t?tri5 wv^-N'c^y wo .............................................—o ^ i\.')l-koJ^^__________ X___________ ^OcC\^ or^c^vA*'^A Vi\TV\ G>)OT\Atl2- ^ .'^Ci A(q vl/ c^'^tie.wGvsAy ■D^-b'^wALv; __ LtifliiTM bl X X .. X X l(o.6 -OP.O . v.F,iV ©=31&S.F. ^b&O S.F.© =S.F, ^ ' UoO S.F. r© S.f. Mz S.F. p)| \io"^S.F. jd^ {'bo <• C 1 1 1, ^ « 1 1 1 1 \hO •■ f ®• r 1 1 1 pZor<T V40s^% ^ <7 lP«f 0<= U>T W OoO , X .__ = ^uo S.F.© . X _».v\, S.F.di^ X 0.^1 =■yn S.F. O OO ^ <5“ COfHC. X S.F. S.F. ^ X ‘ Total HAnccovci^ in Zone Total PnopeaTY Area in Zore S.F. S.f. , S.F. ^-'A^^27 X 100 MOTiZ \I'XaT D(5u\VM\'n-\ L:€:m^TA >= \sv OTH YAC^lc ?LA^1'^ACi'\U:■2l^0 Co A^POTlTC. CA-b'O ? PoG, f^AA-A ■V MINNESOTA REGiHRjHrON NO 'id O LOTS I 7 IGHWOOD AKE MINN r D PROPO-bGO COM‘D\T\ONlt?' f-0\L ONKA HENN INNESO CO A ss LU 00 oX LUo <or <o L J <> ' *> t'r'' ' il. / .'>0^V \ c%. 7;; -W > ■' 4 (?0 / r>^OVo>t>J v>i;i/’L;iuyr.n UiLLUUti iuu nun,\.jiLL( i-rijACK 20a£: (emeu OIIE) 7U-2M' 25U-S00' MO-1000'K'^ ?ed?(y3 (JD~£xj-,:44iig flAfiucuvcH ui Zohe '. --treio ixvTbX> ............................................. 4-5 ‘H: "sUC'CTT ^ ov-*‘bHGis^t? ^ ^^ o /-/nCi^A. ; A-')v\0o5C:, \"L'5 X ^0.6 ------ ^^ A j;.F, Lliflii l H WIliTII (n A Ci At/ni C^^w\GV siM u /A S.F. K /a S.f. X _MQQ S.F. X S.F. ,S.F. ® 02^ XAOO-,C Gn-')oTiA(ia:5 \n^X 0.6 b6 £.P ^6 ^5 s.v=; 6 3 S.F. /N I T>3 ^ ‘ %jiy\CNC P CO*NC*vOA‘ I vsn,L.u 61 bl I i S.F. 6 \\6"^i \ HO \Mo. S.F. V « X \54 o \ % 36 \36 •» S.F. LO X \VO S.F.I i ti>X \-5^ ^ S.F. 5\^b 0.53 i •' \ \ ^ .*- lo4, £.F. 1,^ \3 035 g>S.F. Total HAnflcovEir in Zone AHA ._ S.F. t>CcOPJsTS.;C. 6l- fl>U»_ VN4 00^ ■A*;2+-'-S vJ,o«-'3tr 91*7" T otal PHOFEaiY Area in Z one 130 S.F B 2-IHA ^uj inio X 100 '■%i: X 1 \ ^■ . -SI. . , .O-'b'b =.n • _ „ _______ X ^ c X • • _X %• •• c --X ^ ^ •^ iC c WC'rr frfrvAT/Dri I X 5 Si5 - t-« *-• ••• ffkM SmtMt ••• %4 t>'f •••^ T f • '■') m —SH- tfvM •mm •t't *«»#v-v ·------- I ;.. l e �1 I �g "l 1� � .. � . I• • . • . I _,. __ -........ -----�·· • ___ _ . " ----I -----'·, ( ' I . . . ·, --¥ ,,·.: ••• ,· >..y:l -·· I ) l .. I ••,, ... , . ,. ... l .•• I • • I .. l'l., ,,. ,-,"t'f lf('\'M I I �·· ..... " .. � - """I• I I ... • j ' . . .I I" •l I !I I ---:--;---J .. ,Io• , ..... I'••-··­•'· .. , . ,. -• •l r,,u/\ .J C• l • t I ,, , . (' . ··-· -. ··) ----·'.r:1� ..... 'l . 1:-.�. t'" .. ,,, ·­•• I• .. ••• --:--= --·1 .. . . ...... . .. . ' ....... ' I : .. ·. ' - I I I t 1 I I I I I I II 1:'·,,, . . . I •r.. , - l I . ........ ... I ...... ;�. 1 �--... \' I . . . 't. ' ... ·· .I • . . .···�-,, •I . '1 J ,-,, .,.,..,., I ,, .,,, I •' F oon PL/\tl ------ -. ' !J .. . • • ' I . , . '. I i . l . I ., . I -----ci:.o -··--- .,,.,r: 41, 1 11:. A .. , ... .. ., .I I 1 ' . r; I , )) ... -.,_ -·--.. .. .. -- I ,t , ............. ,.., o<• (I u• ••, . . .,,., 'n,v..:=.!'-..:.,:-_. -·M·,-�-:-.-,-•--•-· ... • --· .,, __ ti •r' __/ 2ND FLOOR PLAN )f .. ·••Cf l;'.�1" • , • '<:""· . ""- .. v ---- a i '· . i* n If f» !*:*•:•* _# ii i4 \*' -V * *■ 1\^ ■] t1 It JIM ««• REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ITEM NO.: . %A. DATE: Jun^/{494 %> Agenda ScctionT^*^Administrator Reviewed: Zoning Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Item Description: n933 Tandem Properties/Peter Andrea Company, 2645/3025 Watertown Road - PreliminaiA' Subdivision. Second Phase - 21 Lots - Resolution Request by Applicant to be Presented before the Council at their June 27th Meeting Brief Review' of Application The first phase of the comprehensive Tandem Propenies subdivision application is in the process^ of bein» filed bv the City. Although the City review of the subdivision application was reviewed in two phases, 'the other reviewing agencies have completed a comprehensive review ot the 46 lot total division MCWD. DNR and Army Corps of Engineers have approved the final pding and drainaoe plan and mitigation plan as originally presented to the Council during the first phase review. Review Exhibit E. the City Engineer has no further comments except to ask tor more detail of certain drainage facility improvements. Comprehensive grading and drainage plans have been completed by the developer's surveyor/engineer and are m the process ot being reviewed by the engineer's office. Plcise review Exhibit T, applicant has asked to be scheduled at the very next meeting of the Council as applicant intends to complete all site development improvements for the comprehensive 46 lot subdivision. The subdivider must first achieve preliminary plat approval before Phase 2 site improvements can commence. For more detail on the review ot this application, please review the staff memo uated June 16. 1994 enclosed with this memo. Summary Review Comments for Phase 2 Subdivision Lot Configuration Lots 15 and 18 (Coffin property) do not meet the required width ot 200 at the tront street setback line adjacent to the cul-de-sac. Members approved the contiguraiion as it is consist with past policy when dealing with new subdivisions when lots abut a cul-de-sac. The Planning Commission approved the back lot configuration for Lots ‘ind(Coffin property) findinu a loop road connecting the northern cul-de-sac road wit ate own iv would have a inajor impact on the designated wetland within Lot 16. The installation ot a Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 June 24. 1994 Zoninc File #1933 private road would have a major impact upon existing development along Watertown Road. The creation of the private driveway outlot and degree ot use would have less impact on existing development. The Planning Commission asked that the setbacks be redesignated ' reouirinc 150% of the standards. Side yards must be changed to 45 and rear to 75 ^ I - also noted by the Planning Commission that Lot 15 (Coffin property) side setback should be adjusted to 50' adjacent to Outlot B. Gradiiig/Drainage/Wctland At the Planning Commission meeting the developer .advised that Mr. ^anta of the Army Cotp^ of Bf’ineers found no problem with applicant ’s recent request, review Exhibits L. M and N. Yaiua^idvised that he would have to bring it before a higher board but that he saw no problem with the reduction in fill as proposed by applicant. The residents of Countryside Drive during the first review voiced major concern wtth new developln. creating or ’ intensifying problems with drainage. The nonhern developed lots already have severe drainage problems specifically the houses at Manor Circle. The pond Lwn at the northeast corner within Lot 8 (Dickey property) provtde retemion. Drainage will fiow along Willow Road evenmally to the DNR park and then under the Luce Line via'dS' culvert, review Exhibits P and S. Parks/Trails/Park Dedication It is the CitVs intention to ask for a park dedication fee for the second phase subdivision. The Pirnninu Commission questioned applicant as to the location of the private tnKr,or trad within the Coffin property that intersected the designated wetland areas. Review Exhibits I and T he Otvos designated wetland maps would show no connection between the two wetlands but in the S ntation of wetlands study completed by Prank Svobada. Exhibit A, wetland bodies are hown as conneeted In reality, developer’s surveyor noted dial during wet seasons there is a Jf-dnY wav that mav be filled when an overflow from one wetland lakes place. It is the plan of he developer lo'conduci no land alterations but to place wood chips on e.xisiing gradev Wood ch ps on exitiina -rade are not considered hardcover and will have no unpact on the interaction between iIkIwo wetland bodies. The Planning Commission approved the trail location based on the following conditions; 1.Any future land alterations within the wetland area or within 26’ of the wetland must be approved by the City. 2.Placement of wood chips on existing grade is not considered hardcover. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 June 24. 1994 Zoning File iiS^1933 3.Minimal use of the trail is proposed as it is to serve only the 20 residential lot owners within the Coffin propeny subdivision. Septic All 21 lots of the second phase subdivision have been found to have suitable area for primarv’ and alternate drainfield sites suitable for 5 bedroom home design. Roads The 21 lot second phase subdivision shall be served by cul-de-sac roads and a private driveway outlot. All cul-de-sac roads and private driveways shall be maintained privately by benefitting property owners consistent with the City’s policies. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the Tandem Properties’ second phase 21 lots subdivision approving the back lot configurations servings Lots 16 and 17 within the Coffin propeny and the general road layout as proposed. The granting of lot width variances for Lots 15 and 18 within the Coffin property is consistent with the granting of previous lot width variances with new subdivisions for lots abutting a cul-de-sac. The Planning Commission approved the location and design of interior trail that encroaches the designated wetland areas on the Coffin property based on the findings set forth above. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission’s unanimous recommendation of approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed preliminary plat approval resolution. ch A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION OF OUTLOTS B AND C, OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD ADDITION -FILE NO. 1933 WHEREAS, Tandem Propenies and Peter Andrea Company (hereinafter the "subdividers"), on April 26. 1994. filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a 21 lot residential plat of property legally described as: Outlots B and C. Old Crystal Bay Road Addition. Hennepin County. Minnesota (her einafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono ’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Plannine Commission held a public hearing on June 20. 1994. at which time all persons desiring to be helird concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and \\HEREAS, at their regular meeting held on June 27, 1994. the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdividers, noting the following findings of fact; 1 3. 4. The properties are located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District, requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry ’ buildable land within each newly created lot. The property contains a total of 57 acres with 7 acres of designated wetland and retention/treatment area. The proposed plat consists of 21 residential lots, each meeting the minimum requirement of 2 acres of dry buildable area. Lots 15 and 18 that abut the cul-de-sac area within the Coffin second phase division do not meet the required lot width of 200' at the rear of the front street setback line. Plannimt Commission recommended approval of the lot width variance as it would bel;onsistent with rural developments where lots are located Pace 1 of 7 r c J. adjacent to a cul-de-sac as long as all other lot standards are satisfied. All 21 lots have been found to have adequate and suitable soils for on-site septic treatment facilities. Private roads shall serve 11 lots within the second phase division of the Dickey property and 8 lots within the Coffin property. Both curb cuts for the private roads have been approved by the City Engineer finding there is adequate siting distance for egress and ingress at a 40 mph road. No additional curb cuts will be allowed from these properties. The City has approved a back lot configuration for Lots 16 and 17 of the Coffin property allowing the continued use of a private driveway to serve two properties. The City has approved the platting of the back lots within the 10 lot division ot the Coffin property second phase based on the following findings: A.Lots will meet 150% of the area and setback standards required for back lots. B.Alternative of providing access via an e.xtended road corridor or loop road would have the following impacts: (1)The loss of mature trees providing screening for e,xisting development to north. This will also allow existing natural amenities to remain for future residential development of the surrounding area. (2).A road extension or loop road through the area of Outlot C would require major filling of a designated wetland area located within Lot 16. (3)An extension or loop road would impact existing residences on Watertown Road with additional noise and headlights from private road use. Pace 2 of 7 9. 10. The City approves the interior trail plan tor the .second phase division of the Coffin property allowing for the placement ot wood chips on existing grade not to exceed a 5’\o 8’ width. This approval is based on the following findings: A.No land alterations are proposed within the wetland or within 26’ of wetlands. B.The proposed trail design will have no impact on the existing wetlands nor on their interaction. C.Proposed trail will not impede surface runoff nor would it create down stream Hooding or pollution problems. The City has based preliminary’ approval ot this plat on the applicants engineer and the City engineer’s reports and findings confirming that drainage from the second phase residential development will not intensify drainage/Hooding of down stream area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV'ED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat applicant of Tandem Properties and the Peter Andrea Company per plat drawings by Mark S.Gronbcrg. a licensed surveyor of Coffin and Gronberg. Inc., dated November 29. 1993. most revised date May 25. 1994. subject to the following conditions: 1.Cul-de-sac roads on the Coffin and Dickey parcels within Phase 2 shall be private. The City shall obtain underlying road and utility easements. The developer shall create private covenants for the maintenance of private roads. 2.Applicants should also address the ownership of Outlot C and whether that shall be a shared ownership. If not. then one owner shall be responsible for granting an easement to the second owner. 3 Subdivider shall be responsible for installing pedestrian interior trails as shown Oil trail plans drafted by .Mark Gronbcrg of Coffin and Gronbcrg. Inc. Interior trail within the Coffin parcel shall be installed with wood chips placed on existing iirade. Paiie 3 of 7 4.Dedication of drainage and utility caseme-is 5' along all interior lot lines and 10 along the perimeter boundaries and adjacent to road right-of-ways. 5 Prior 10 anv site improvements within the second phase, erosion control as shown on preliminary grading and drainage plates must be installed and maintained until natural groundcover is restored. 6.Prior to site grading improvements, all tested septic sites on the Coffin an^ Dickey parcels must be »>nced off (exception Lots 16 and 17, Coltin parcel). 7 All wetlands designated on City conservation maps shall be shown as drainage easements on the plat. Desig- .ted wetland within Lot 16 must be designated bv a drainage easement. 8 Drainage easements sha'l be taken ove, all retention ponding areas and drainage wlvs as in the first phase review, such easements shall be recorded m the chain of'title and developer sl..-ll create covenants to detine future ho.ite owners association's responsibility for the upkeep and maintenance ol all drainage facilities. 9 Payment of a park dedication fee prior to final plat appro'ral .be City will require no park or trail dedications wfh the sec.nd phase luttii... of tl..s property. 10.The following lots have been found to contain protected wCk.ands not designated on the City’s conservation area maps: Dickev Parcel; ' Lots 8, 17, 18 and 19, Block 2. Coffin Parcel: Lots 11. 12. 13. 15. 17 and 20, Block 1. The following lots have involvement with mnigaiion ar s. Dickey Parcel; ^ .r. m t Lots 8, 9, 13. 16, 17. 18 and 19. Block 2. piWLt "V*-;/V • '^■1. . • V' -em,4\ ■ % ^ Jf4gr.-;v *I?t Page 4 of 7 t. -6 4 ft <P V ,.• « .. X- ^circcl * .ots n. 12, 13. 15, 17:ind 20. Block 1. the first >.o ’‘vision, the subdivider shall create covenants to be hied in r • I -h these properties advising future owners ot the limitations use of ir-. . sp^-cific areas and the need to first apply to Corps of •rs a«d the Minneh. 'a Creek Watershed District if any ‘^^^^emen^^^^^^ d at some future date before obtaining necessary permits trom tl e City ot ,nt to execute developer’s agreement to insure all grading/drainage eLnis and road inrprovemcras are insra'ded to City's samtacuon. No land .ms can take place until erosion control is established and septic si^s and the Ciiv is in receipt of final grading and road plans. No ements can becin until City- Engineer has mproved improvement plans, .r of credit an approved form of a nnv a faillv executed developer’s agreement written to I50ro ot the cos iropc-d road and site improvements. No building permits will be issued 1 drainage tacilities have been installed and approved : its -^ctory road base ited. list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administra.^^^^ gularl, scheduled Council meeting on me second and toun . .. ii)rnittals are a' follows: r the 'uced =: 200’. Drawing to include: Lot lines pla-ed per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg of Coflln and Gron^rg, Inc. dated November 20. 1993, most revised May .5, 1994 Dedication of -drainage and utility easements" c,s t ■ ' in Item 3 above. Designation and dedication of drainage ca -m.'P' ov .. jetention areas ifi age 5 of 7 ft r within both the Dickey and Cotfin parcels. Designation of private roads as Outlots and private driveway outlot at 30' width serving Lots 16 and 17. L Dedication and designation of drainage easements over all protected wetlands within second phase plat. F.Naming of plat. Ixgal documents required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest The City Attorney's oil ice to determine if title opinion for first phase subdivision is still acceptable for second phase subdivision. Signed and executed drainage easements to be taken over detention areas within plat Applicant to obtain copies of standard easement documents from City. Signed and executed developer ’s agreement and either a letter of credit or supplemental mortgage for site improvements and constmetion of private roads and drainage facilities. Applicant to obtain copies of standard developer's agreement. Signed and executed road and utility easements over private road outlots within Coffin and Dickey properties. L Signed and executed declaration of private covenants covering upkeep and maintenance of private roads and drainage lacilities. F Completed application for private road name on both Coffin and Dickey properties. Flease note the seLction of the road name is a separate action of the Council and should be submitted as soon as applicant has completed Page 6 of 7 the selection of three name choices for each roadway. G.Completed private covenant for lots involved with protected wetlands not included within conservation maps of City and mitigation areas. As in the first phase review, the covenants should include a map and metes and bounds description and to be in a form suitable for filing. 3.Fees to be paid: Total due: $375.00_’! A.Final plat fee = S 173.00. g LtJ2al review' and filing fees for subdivision and associated documents — $200.00. C ^Payment of park fee for the second phase subdivision. Assessor to determine final fee. Applicant to receive a credit of $17,010.00 for over payment of first phase park fee payment. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 27th day of June. 1994. AITEST: Dorothy M. Ilallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The forecoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day ot June, 1994. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Ilallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono. a .Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the Citv. Notary Public Page 7 of 7 To: From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Council members Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabiisth. Building & Zoning Administrator June 16, 1994 ;^1933 Tandem Propenies/Peter Andrea Company, 2645/3025 Watertown Road -PreliminarN' Subdivision Second Phase - 21 Lots - Continuation ol Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1.Chapter 11. Those standards pertinent to Class 111 subdivisions involving dedication of roads, drainage and utility easement, drainage easements, etc. Section 10.55, Subd. 8 - 26* setback to be maintained from designated wetland by all improvements. Review Outlot C within Coffin parcel. The existing driveway will be approved as a pennanent driveway serving two lots. Applicant proposes no tunher encroachment of wetland with road improvement. Also review interior trail location within Coffin parcel - trail encroaches dedicated wetlands. Section 10.28. Subd. 5 (B) - RR-IB lot standards. Section 10.03, Subd. 27 - Standards for back lots. Review Lots 16 and 17 within Coffin propertv considered back lots. Note the 150% of lot width and area are satisfied. North side lot line within Lot 17 should be increased to 45*. Section 10.55, Subd. 15 - City to obtain drainage easements over designated conservation areas. List of exhibits Application Plat Map Certificate of Mailing for Renotification Weekman Report 6/9/94 Gustafson Report 6/14/94 Resolution .Approving First Phase Plat Plat of Old Crystal Bay .Addition Plan of Interior Trails/Old Crystal Bay Road Bike Trail Designated Wetlands Wetlands Delineation Maps Tandem Unter to MCWD-Statement of Commitment, Permit 94-14 Tandem L.eiter to Corps of F.ngineers Regarding Nationwide Permit-Fill Reductions within Lots 17 and IS Zoning File «^1933 June 16, 1994 Page 2 M -Amended Filling Plan Requested by Corps N - Plan of Applicant ’s Amended Fill Plan O - Local Watershed Maps P - Drainage-Dickey Property-Nonheast Along Willow Q-1-2 Inventory of Disturbed Areas/Mitigaiion Areas K - MCWD Permit 5/3/94 S - Preliminary' Plans of Second Phase Pertinent Facts for Second Phase Development Dickey site - 11 lots Total acreage = 26.04 acres exclusive of road riaht-of-ways Coffin site - 10 lots Total acreage = 29.6 acres (2.75 wet) e.xclusive of road right-of ways and driveway outlot These areas do not include wetlands Ty'pes 1 and 2 not included in conserv'ation maps of the City nor does it include the areas defined as mitigation wetland area. Status of First Phase Subdivision and Permitting Processing The first pha.se subdivision is m the process of being filed by the City. Accessory documents are in the final stages of completion and ready for filing. The MCWD, or LGU for the City, has eranted comprehensive approval of the drainage and mitigation plans completed during the first phase review. The DNR has completed its review of the impact of the proposed total development on the Luce Line. All required improvements set forth in that review have been included in the final plat approval resolution, review Fxhibit F. Review Exhibits L, M and N.Durinc the Corps comprehensive review' ot the 46 lot subdivision. Mr. \anta advised that if the appUcant was to meet the requirements of a nationwide permit that filling within Lots 17 and 18 would have to be reduced. The developer is concerned with the impact on the building envelop* d has submitted a request to reconsider their request to reduce the filling by .4 acre. Review Exhibit M. Applicant has submitted the amended plan showing a reduction in the amount of fill by .25 acres asking that the additional .15 acre of fill needed to provide a reasonable separation between the wetland and the proposed home site. The developer has asked that the nationwide permit be approved asking that Basin 1-A receive 2.03 acres ot till. Statt will contact Mr. Yanta prior to the meeting to see if he will approve amended proposal. In conclusiofi, all reviewing agencies have reviewed the comprehensive drainage and grading plan and have either provided conceptual approval or conditional approval. The Park Commission has reviewed the 46 lot proposal. The City has approved the comprehensive interior trail plan, review Exhibit II. The Park Commission has not been asked to review the second phase subdivision. Zoning File #1933 June 16, 1994 Page 3 Review of Second Phase Subdivision Lot Configuration All lots meet the required two acres of dry contiguous lands exclusive of designated wetlands and retention treatment ponds. Note the designated wetland within Lot 16 has not been shown as a drainage easement. The lot area should be amended to include total dry buildable exclusive of wetland area. Lots 15 and 18 (Coffin property) do not meet the required width along cul-de-sac. Lots 15. 16. 17, 18 and 19 (Dickey property) are classified as through lots and conditional use permits would be required for any accessory structure installed at some future date. As already noted above in the factual findings. Lots 16 and 17 are served by a driveway outlot that has been placed over an existing driveway that served the Coffin residence within Lot 16. As in the first phase review, the road layout and driveway access serving Lots 16 and 17 were conceptually approved by both Planning Commission and Council during the sketch plan review phase. The issue of applicability must be addressed in this review. A loop road connecting northern cul-de-sac road with Watertown Road would have a major impact on the desimiated'wetland. In the conceptual review of the application, the City deemed it not necessary to have a loop road connecting Old Cr>'stal Bay Road to Watertown Road. The installation of a private road within the area defined as Outlot C would also impact existing development, specifically adjacent to the existing driveway at the intersection ot Watertown Road. The north side yard of Lot 17 should be adjusted to a 45* width. Lot 15 ’s side setback should be adjusted to 50’ adjacent to Outlot B (Coffin property). Cl rad i m? / D ra i na ge/Wet I a nd s As already noted above in the status report, the only agency still to complete the review of the comprehensive grading and drainage plan is the Corps. Mitigation areas have been approved. The issue for the Corps is the resolve of the amount ol fill to be placed within Lots 17 and 18 (Dickey property). There was concern with drainage coming from northeast comer ot Dickey parcel eventuallv to the Luce Line. As noted by developer during the first phase review, a retention pond is pn.iposed within Lot 8 (Dickey). Drainage will drain from pond along Willow Drive throuizh the DNR park under Luce Line via a 48" culvert that carries drainage through a swale eventuallv south along Willow (review Exhibit P). The developer shall provide increased storage capacity at the noriheasi corner of the Dickey property to mininii/e any impact on existinc developed properties in Countryside neighborhood. Parks/Trails/Park Dedication The City will ask for a park dedication fee foi the .second phase subdivision. Applicant should respond to placement of interior trail within designated wetlands. We did not address r Zoning File i»1933 June 16, 1994 Page 4 this issue durinu the first phase review, probably, because we were too involved with Sacred I^nd issues and public vs. private trail ownership. It is not clear whether the interior trail was even designated on preliniinarv’ plans reviewed by Planning Commission during first pha.se review'. Why can't trail be relocated aw'ay from wetlands'.’ Septic Please review E.xhibit D. Weekman notes all 21 lots have been found to have suitable area for primary' and alternate drainfield sites suitable lor a tive-bedroom home. Roads Applicant proposes a cul-de-sac road accessing at Willow Drive to serve the second phase Dickey parcel. The Coffin parcel will be served also by a cul-de-sac road and private driveway outlot serving Lots 16 and 17. Note the City has already approved the back lot configurations for Lots 6 and 7. The developer is once again advised that if cul-de-sac roads are proposed, they shall remain privately maintained by benefitting propeny owners consistent with the City's policy. Other issues raised bv the Planning Commission Any condition of approval should include the following conditions: Recommendation must provide supportive findings approving the back lot configurations for Lots 16 and 17 finding them not to ha\e been a convenience to the developer but based on findings supporting environmental and aesthetic concerns for the development. Will Planning Commission recommend setback variances for encroachment of wetlands bv interior trails.’ If so. list applicant’s hardships. Lot width variances for Lots 15 and 18 would be consistent when lots abut cul-de-sac. The following conditions are recommended by staff: 1.Cul-de-sac roads on Coffin and Dickey parcels shall be private. The City shall obtain underlying road and utility easements. The developer shall develop private covenants for the maintenance of private roads. .Applicant should also address the ownership of Outlot C. whether that shall be a shared ownership. If not. then one owner shall be responsible for granting an easement to the second owner. Zoning File "1933 June 16, 1994 Paue 5 7. 8. 9. Dedication of drainage and utility easements 5’ along all interior lot lines and 10’ along the perimeter boundaries and adjacent to road rights-of-way. Prior to any site improvements within the second phase, erosion control as shown on preliminary grading and drainage plans must be installed and maintained until natural groundcover is restored. Prior to site grading improvements, all tested septic sites on both the Coffin and Dickey parcels must be fenced off. (e.xception Lots 16 and 17, Coffin parcel) Approval of interior trail plan for second pha.se of Coffin parcel. The Dickey parcel involves the north lot line of Lot 13, second phase. All wetlands designated on City conservation maps shall be shown as drainage easements on the plat. Designated wetland within Lot 16 must be designated by a drainage easement. Drainaee easement shall be taken over all retention ponding areas and drainageways. As in the first phase reviews, such easement shall be • .corded in the Chain of Title and developer shall create covenants to define future homeowners ’ association’s responsibility for upkeep and maintenance ot all drainage facilities. Payment of a park dedication fee prior to final plat approval. The following lots have been found to contain protected wetlands not designated on the City’s conservation area maps: Dickey parcel;Lots 8. 17. 18 and 19. Block 2 Coffin parcel:Lots 11. 12. 13. 15, 17 and 20. Block 1 The following lots shall have involvement with mitigation areas: Dickey parcel;Lots 8. 9. 13. 16. 17. 18 and 19. Block 2 Coffin parcel:Lots 11. 12. 13. 15. 17 and 20. Block 1 As with the first subdivision, the developer shall create covenants to be filed in the Chain of Title of each of these properties advising future owners ot the limitations on the use of these specific areas and the need to tirst apply to the Corps of Engineers and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District it any improvements are proposed at some future date before obtaining necessary permits from the City *4 (3n>no. Zoning File #1933 June 16. 1994 Page 6 Applicant to execute Developer’s Agreement to ensure all grading/drainage improvements and road improvements are installed to City ’s satisfaction. No land alterations can take place until erosion control is established and septic sites fenced and the City is in receipt of final grading and road plans. No improvements can begin until City Kngineer has approved all improvement plans. A Letter of Credit must accompany a fully executed Developer's Agreement written to 150% of the cost of the propo.sed road and site improvements. No building pennits will be issued until all drainage facilities have been installed and approved satisfactor>' road base completed. Prior to final plat approval, applicant shall provide road name choices for the private cul-de-sac roads within both the Coffin and Dickey parcels. r //(\i ORONO - SnBDIVtSION APPLICATI^^ ^ ^ OPERTY LOCATION Site Address 2X^f. m #t _\ '/.zi Za^O ^0/f< /y Qtf~//7 ~Z3'IY' Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^y-//7-zi Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Naune Phone (home) phone (work) W/ ~^^7J Address: ^ 7,Tir C^rn>/>iy_ City:= OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __— Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: ^_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ ^ity:_ (attach list it more than one; Zip: EXISTING LAND USE Nximber of Tax Parcels TVTVt Development Size Present '.-se (check) /L3t nJL±L Acres Dry Land Acres V7et Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of ^nitSjj-y Other (specify) Present Zoning District ^0'/S 1 i:’c aw^v.uvvvv'v ^^ \t " i i i / ^ ^V i ’w* 1 • w* • vv i.I Ti ii <«V PROPOSAL _ __ _ _7^^ _ _ M. _ _ _ .J /* ,\y“» i , I ^ I ■* fDivision for Tax Purposes ^^X>2310 tvvi >;Vi •ii- Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites 0^/36. Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check)X Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per/£^^Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) r MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY 7O»PLICATI0N 1, Completed Application Form 2.Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3, Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtairv this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 4.As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ Date 1.Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2.Signed Certificate of Su'-vey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3.Title opinion. 4.Easements, Covenants, etc. 5.Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _Date PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II s III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) fms ^Atc /A-/ Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees^established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. i -----f. rr i '2^ ^‘ * i ri;, y.-----•*_.-----«.n ,------fl""ct * v’ /3^ .^li-o''-&/•f- .2^ - mm i I :; J “ i ►«»* i J- 1 ucam iftw l«% r _*- Ic'"/ •t _Jt« «•« -J' ' M -—W»~7\* •vtru^v*. OfH?-?- « < '/ *r .L it. <V, ■Hi \ «.c> / -J ' Q^/- I •.* I «• .H •i ( •is-' «»• •• •*■ * ‘t \1 ■V, 1 1 1!*• ► . 1 -'J/ 1 ' •! ’S u f*l&0« . — -... .ft — ' 1^ i." r*-^Vir ^13 -« _ ill -A“* '“ 1^ /?(/ J#i / mt**f > •! V ; (HImm *' • > ■•••^ iT I H 0 ATE, 11/0 V75 'Mii itvi-m;!■ --------AOORvf'J'r.OZAAO.Jf'.V HATERTOItl RO1 NAME,■JiWirAjP'ELLIS •35-116-23 0028it. 'RUN: ■-■'batch OOAt.'v. - >"X,: . • ••./ iJy *./...PROP “’ V * 0HT4ER NAn6//'An;2,TAXPAYERr //y. NAME/AOOR .^rt2<#5*0. HATERTOHT4 ROADf ’' « • • X;• U 1 nUfi' I AKP^ » 5555;.Vj!"-4C-^'’iH^L?^5^’j5-iie-25 00V -, PROP A0bR5tS<000AlSf;.HILLOH OR N •fi VOHNER NAHE .?-<|T^A\SAN0HEI S L R S • TAXPAYER LINDA R SftNOHtI ' '•• NAHE/ADDR‘#AimiLLOH OR N .' •■'i.' -‘'‘"l^'tONG LAKE MN 55556 ’ T.’■•.;: - ■ HtriNEPIN :,ANDMEI 33 0055 •'•PROP:A00Rifetb0038^'4A0DRESS UNASSIGNEO ' ’ OHNER NAME'iSlGAYE; RENOLEMAN , " TAXPAYER •>,^;‘ HILLIAM':MARTIN •.' NAME/ADOR‘i*(;23e0 HATERTOHN RO ■•..•■ • • i.;. .' VLONG LAKE MN . 55556 00<« 00061 ' : -'.p’ J*. *1 IK •* ,*** a*'.)’.'--*'-'' ' '■ :v COUNTY PHOPLHTY INfORMATION SYSTEMPROPERTY OUMERS LIST50 55-118-25 002902920 HATERTONN ROH J JOHNSON EIALTIMOTHY JOHNSON2^.20 NftTERTOlOT ROLotto LAKE M!1 55556 report tiO. PI^55<401i38 35-110-2502*400 WATERTOWNJEFFREYJLEXAEY2^00 WATERTOW LOriG LAKE tftiMARTHtNEAUERTOHN RO •'I« f50 55-110-23 66 005200051NULOH DR NVIOLA T GUNSOLUS VIOLA T GUNSOLUS 51 WILLOH DR N LONG LAKE tIN 55556 56 36-110-23 33 0056 02265 UATERTOlflt RD THOMAS J RYAN THOflAS J RYAN 22A5 HATERTONN RD LONG LAKE Mtl 55356 »i 30 36-110-23 3302300HATERTOHN 2380 HATERTONN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 tfi^VPPpiImmif *• . ► •V 0006 '^u-____________ I RO . •E -V J ■HILLIAM E MARTIN ,,,-O; NILLIAH MARTIN 'O •>• ■’ rv''5^/- 2380 HATERTONN RD ' ■0: ■1 'i-f -=jV 11 'WALTER 2360 H LOttG LAKE MN Cci f/yi > mm fci trV.* • 1 • J*' It6*i' •I im'fi f- ^1- r »^i •■•■••. ••.•.•-V •'', 1 Cii '.(}•** 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE REC0RDS\ OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROP^fY_JAXATI.ON» TO^^^E BEST,-^. pS OF MY KrtONLEDGE AND BELIEF. OAT //Am m. ••• • i • / . • »"v ."•.c.vr . .‘*1* ' ■;--Mv ,1 *. • 1*r •. I 'i ■..'.J.'-'- .tJ-:- ■.1 •' •- r * J .’. r ♦ .1 •-.» 1 *! K»M 'S'J s w.',I ..V .•t-‘j A* % -J c '('V • H if*:; .i . ••i' *■ V ' 'i <.-^v '• i Vi \ '•* •’ ••RUN DATE. 11/09/95 V;.-BATCHV •■,5805-117-25 22 0005PROP ADOR>,\ 02575.LONGVIEW CIROWJER NAME V, G;« s'LObICTfERTAXPAYER '.-.i; GARY 0 4 SANOHA F LOETETTER' NAME/ADDR •••‘Z575 LONG.’itW CIRCLE[long.LAKE MN 55556•'A LONG.LAKE Ir • . v.r . ••58?05-117• . V.r .-V58? 05-117-25 22 0020 PROP AOORS-02575 ' DEVIN LA ■ty it. '1 55556 OWNER NAME.,;C^S R CARODENUTO TAXPAYER ; • C^j R CARQOENUTO NAME/AUDR'-2575 DEVIN LA ; • jj'.LONG LAKE MN 5 .... .Ih*,. . . I'-;j.;;*58i>’0A-117-25 11 0005 •'PROp 'aOOR'K/'OEAIS'. ' COUNTRYSIDE DR . OWNER NAME'*.-\P?4 J miller ^ 'TAXPAYER • PHILLIP C MILLER -•.'■ NAME/ADDR ' 2A55 COUNTRYSIDE DR .1.'.1 -..Hong LAKE,MN .55556 ifir'', ;• . •;58,*.0A-117-25 11 0008 PROP ADDR' .;;;00150 •; MANOR CIR . OT«)ER NAME .K AiV .BANGERT L...TAXPAYER KEITH 4 VIVIAN BANGERT NAME/ADDR V, 150iMAfWR CIR 55556A.-: • : WJ-LONG LAKE si .V.58 ;’0A-117-25 11 0011 •PROP* AOOR; ,:!o2565 'COUNTRYSIDE OR ■. OTTNER NAME /a TIB'MICH .4 C E MICH •taxpayer v.‘ITHOMAS B MICH HAME/AOOR ifuZSbS COWTTRYSlOE DR * .•.•.* -! .!• I A»JT! I AKC MN 55556•: LONG lake MN .V .• T ;v,--* I,'V'-' : •f .’r'J^'58'i!0A-117-2: niNNEPlN COLUTTY PROPERTY INrOPMATlCHT SYSTEMPROPERTY 0WT4ERS LIST58 05-117-25 22 001000010 WILLOW OR SWILLIAM S BOWMAN ET ALFni S BOWMAN 4 A B MCCOURTC/0 JACK J RANDALL6TH 4 MARQUETTE 15500 fAT CTRMPLS MN 55s«79-20<«9580'«-117-25 11 000502<*20 COUNTRYSIDE OR ROSS NATHANSOtT ROSS tTATHANSON P 0 BOX 189 LOtTG LAKE m 55556-0189 58 0<«-117-25 11 0006 02<«75 COUNTRYSIDE DR H E HITE JR 4 B A MITE H EUGENE S BARBARA A HITE JR 2<475 COUtilRYSlDE DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 50 04-117-25 11 0009 00145 MANOR CIR D H OILLICK 4 L K BILLICK 8 H OILLICK 4 L K BILLICK 145 MAfJOR CIR LOtJG LAKE MN 55556 50 04-117-25 12 0004 y 02615 COUNTRYSIDE DR / D 4 S PEARCE DAVID W * SUSAN M PEARCE 2615 COUNTRYSIDE OR LONG LAKE Hi 55556 0001r*,.. 58'? 04-117-25 15 •PROP ADDR.'. m'00540' f OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S OWNER NAME .■.•R '4 P MINNICH . ■• TAXPAYER ■ROONEY. L MINNICH •NAME/ADDR ' ^AO: OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD . ..*' :.laONG LAKE.m 55556 •;* • r VA*. f »*. -V <V ;'-n'<v'Vi*^' •.*■ V,, ;?K •. ••*! •: •.!* ••7 - •: J. .• 50 04-117-25 15 0004 00250 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S DENNIS 0 THOMPSON ^ DEliNIS 0 THOMPSON 12201 MINNETONKA BLVO .llNNETONKA TBT 55545 REPORT NOPAGE5805-117-25 22 001502580DEVIN LA0 4 L BLAUERDARRELL W BLAUER2500 DEVIN LALOrJG LAKE MN 555565804-117-25 11 000402450COUNTRYSIDE l)R • L A KRETCHMAN 4 S D GRATTOE L A KRETCHMAN 4 S D GRANDE 2450 COUNTRYSIDE LONG lake MN 07 ;r.‘■**' • BHBBHSBi 58 04^17-25 11 0010 .• 58 04-117- 02515 COUNTRYSIDE K R FRITZE 4 K F FRITZE KEITH R 4 KIMBERLY 2515 COLBTTRYSIDE OR LONG LAKE MN •55556 02590 COUtTTRYSIDE OR a_JUKAUTA-«-H-S-KAt-MA ■. UOHW-K-A-HE<LTHER G JLAUTA. 2590 COUNTRYSIDE DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 ';** * . •*'t 9 i • 58 04-117-25 12 0007 02645 WATERTOWN RO PATRICIA C DICKEY PATRICIA C DICKEY 2645 WATERTOWN RD LC'tiG LAKE MN 55556 58 04-117-25 14 0005 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO THE STATE OF MITJNESOTA ' .’ CNR-DUREAU OF REAL EST ATTN GWEN HALLACK 1201 E HWY 2 ' GRAND RAPIDS MTT RUN DATE 11/09/95 vj^..:.;. •• f- ' ’■•'■■■v.'lir •BATCH 004 ! Afl V ■V.-V •:l:V:• •PROP ADORat4ER NAMETAXPAYER rUME/AODR•• ii ♦ -:•1 ;38::^ 5S-118-25 54 0009.r 02845 i i WEAR CIR,‘WEAR ENTERPRISES PARTNERSHIP:WEAR ENTERPRISES PARnTERSHIPC/0 WILLIAM W WEAR}jPO BOX 245•LONG LAKE MTT 551561 •i.3e A53-118-: PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER . NAHE/AOOR :vV _ 23 43 0001 ^ 02760 HATERTOHN RO JOSE PH H ROSCH iJOSEPH' M ROSCH ■6906 JAMES AVE S .RICHFIELD MN 55425 •A . /■ * ^• •}-4 •■•Vi38y 35-118- 00038 ij PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER'.’/GVOA‘ NAHE/ADOR 23 43 0009 ADDRESS UNASSICNEO t-H-e-P-A/Q6T ET--AL .1>05 GOLDEN VIEH DR « . .* •t LOT4G LAKE MN ‘I’l 55556 ■:W' t'T • S fJ' ’li3e^33-118-25 44 0001 02590 WATERTOIA4 RO OHNER NAME-iiiROBERT.F GUESS ETAL TAXPAYERROBERT. F SUES3 ■. rWME/A00R';'i2590 WATERTOW RO PROP ADOR ,•1'.^' :• > 'i i‘, V LONG; LAKE MN J ‘.‘■t * Ir 55356 •I-v>^ r • 'J58- 33-110-23 PROP ADOR 44 0017 HACKOERRY HILL00035 OWNER NAME /fR W WAGMAN ETAL TAXPAYER . /(RICHARD W WAGMAN NAME/AODR .\i> 35 HACKOERRY HILL long lake m •V' #1* • 55356 w ( . . . . . . 25 44 0025 PROP ADOR * ,^",00050 HACKOERRY HILL OHNER NAME i': CHARLES B AUTRY ET AL TAXPAYER ; '' CHARLES B AUTRY NAME/A'.OR.MsO HACKOERRY HILL • i : > '■;s LONG LAKE W 55556 V • :*.‘•'o'* ..-I •.*■*■ HENJiEPIN COUfaTY PROPERTY IfaFORMATION SYSTEMPROPERTY OlCaERS LIST38 33-110-23 34 0010^^02935 JiEAR CIRNEAR EraiERPRISES PARTNERSHIPlaEAR EraiERPRISES PARTNERSHIPC/0 WILLIAM W HEARPO BOX 306LOfiG LAKE rta 5535638 33-110-23 43 0004 02640 HATERTOrara RO T P GORMAra ALT GORMAN T P A L T GORMAN 2640 HATERTONta RD S LOraG lake MN 55356 30 33-110-23 43 0010 00035 GOLDEN VIEW DR M A L CHORLEY MICHAEL E A LUCiraOA CHORLEY 35 GOLDEN VIEW DR LOraC LAKE MN 55356 38 33-110-23 44 0002 02590 HATERTOifta RO ROBERT F SUESS ETAL ROBERT F SUESS 'O 2590 MATERTOiaN RO LOraC LAKE m 55356 30 33-110-23 44 0010 00035 HACKOERRY HILL R W WAGMAN ETAL RICHARD W WAGflAN 35 HACKOERRY HILL LoraG lake nra . 55356 . : ».*• 30 33-110-23 44 0026 00036 HACKOERRY HILL W W WEAR ETAL WILLIAM W WEAR ^ BOX 306 LOraG LAKE MN 55356 ♦*..•• •V -. . 30 33-110-23 34 0011 A:!00030 ADDRESS UraASSIGtaED V.laEAR ENTERPRISES PARiraERSHIP^WEAR ENTERPRISES PARTNERSHIP:C/0 WILLIAM W WEAR -PO BOX 245LOraC LAKE Mra 5535630 33-110-23 43 0005 00120 GOLDEN VIEW DR JOlira HALLSON JOHN T HALLSON P 0 BOX 171 LOraG LAKE MN 55356 30 33-110-23 43 0011 00055 GOLDEN VIEW DR M & 44ARft 55 GOLDEN VIEW LoraG LAKE m ;5 GOLDEN VIEW DR . •|w J' 30 35-110-23 44 0016 00051 HACKOERRY HU J M MTELKE « R J MIELm: ■ ffZ<.' RICHARD J i JANCLLE M MIELKE I'ii’Vk *, i* 51 HACKOERRY HILL VI LONG LAKE MN ' 55356 ‘’Y. 38 33-110-23 44 0019 02400 HATERTOHN RD T-< R H HAGMAN 8 J 8 HACMAN 1 RICHARD H 8 JUT4E B HAGMAN 35 HACKOERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 33-118-23 44 0027 00022 HACKOERRY HILL M J ERNHART 8 T A ERNIIART MICHAEL J ERNHART ‘ 22 HACKOERRY HILL LOtJG LAKE T»T 55356 ' ■• •• u , .•' RUN DATE-11/09/9X k.,V ^^•■■»'■•• i'•;' • . batch. ’ ,r.- >H“rn8/^oA-ii7-25R,C>‘‘'5o2555-;VC(- -ME '‘'.SU'A’SCHI j V'. S'eU A.LL.L.’PROP AOOR '“ (»MER NAME TAXPAYERNAHE/ADOR'0006COUNTRYSIDE ORSCHNEOLYSCMNEDLY■■■'■2555 COUNTRYSIDE OR55J56-25 21 000<4OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROyPROP AODR; ' 1,00085^,.OI«<ER NAME S,,THEO J MEYER ETAL 'TAXPAYER > • ^'THEO.J MEYER NAME/AODR' ’'.e5‘OLO.CRYSTAL BAY ••';.!4L0NG Li^E MN 4 •V. i RO 55356 HCWIEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATIONproperty OlAiERS LIST30 O'V-117-23 21 000102905 HATERIOUN ROMARGARET T TROWBRIDGEMARGARET T TR01©RIOGE2905 WATERTOWN ROLONG LAKE T»4 5535630 06-117-23 21 000500020 WEAR LAJ « 0 M0RT0T4 JAMES 0 A DOROTHY A MORTON 20 WEAR LA LOf<G LAKE MU 55356 SYSTEM r”i^38-^0A-117-23 21 0007 PROP AOOR >00080 .i-WEAR LA OWNER NAME ..G^A C DE^ SANTIS TAXPAY'R ; |*GARY A CHERYL BE SAr4TlS^ NAME/AODR /80 HEAR LA . i;,.>• ‘/.LONG LAKE MN . 55356 *.«•*‘ I-*•**'; •:l ■': .i'- >38 <',0A-ii7-38 '.OA-117-23 22 0020 L OLSOf4 PROP AOORi', 00160 CYGrJET PL . OTATER NAME,.':;P,'A DEBERNARDI A J------------- '! taxpayer yjvZ J;L‘'OLSON A P A BE BERNAROI •NAME/AOOR;;Vl^O'CYGNET PL ■:..';..V‘Ji.ORONO HTT.'; 55356 •r-- .4‘38 ff 04-117-23 22 0023 •. PROP ■ AOOR ’V:if; 00130 -h CYGNET PL -■■OWNER NAME-i ;■ MARGARET. 0 ROSSING •' TAXPAYER v'/VlMARGARET 0 ROSSING NAME/AODR :,’r| 130. CYGNET PL •. ti-ij«;.',HONG lake mn ;55356 23 0011 -PROP'AOOR-'C^bCieS l^yCYGNET PL ■OWNER NAME*;.'CALVIN'PRESBYTER1AN CH ORONO ■TAXPAYER CALVIN PRESBYTERIAJJ - - - - -- - - - -. GLENDALE 55356 ••mV-■ •) 30 04-117-23220011 00135 CYGNET PL H R ANOERSSON « E E MORIARTY H R ANOERSSON A E E MORIARTY 135 CYGNET PL / LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 04-117-23 22 0021 00190 CYGNET PL R A IIOHRMAtJ * R A HOHRHAN ROtJALD A t ROBIN A HOHRMAN /• 190 CYGNET PL LONG LAKE T*4 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0027 03005 WATER!014T4 RO WHEATON C0443TRUCTI0t4 INC STEVEN S MARGO HIRTJES ' 3005 WATERTOI04 RO L044G LAKE MT4 55356 r 30 04-117-23 23 0014 > 00220 CYG44ET PL R J PROVO SR A M M PROVO ROBERT J PROVO 220 CYG44ET PLACE LONG LAKE H4 55356 *• •-B s; «^ r' REPORT NO. >1435401- - - -30 04-117-23 21 000302045 HATERT0F4N ROMICHAEL J FITZPATRICKMICHAEL/PATRICIA FITZPATRICK20-«5 HATERT01444 ROLONG LAKE Ttt4 5535630 04-117-23 21 000600050 WEAR LA ^0 A J HILLDAVID M A JEANETTE P HILL 50 WEAR LA L044G LAKE MT4 .55356 30 04-117-23 22 00145 CYGNET PL A E BLOEMENOAAL ETAL AI6IIIUR C ULULriLNUAAC RT-1 DOH-SeiF L044G LAKE MN 55356 •'/>. *‘ T-VTiiL 30 04-117-23 22 0022 00100 CYC44ET PL VIL OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CHYSTAL BAY HI ' 55359 / 30 04-117-23 22 0028 03045 WATERTOWN RO • BRUCE C A KATHRYN S HALL' BRUCE C A KATHRYN S HALL 3045 HATERTOW44 RO 0R0440 MN 55356 38 04-117-23 00240 CYGNET 0EAt4 K MOLIN E DEAN K MOLIN 240 CYGNET PLA L0T4G lake MN V-:- S-W®S*fy Si.if5 . u.‘- c RUN 0kn \ll/0V9l<^.:'\, . -•ir,.nttnjcPiNzi oozoPROP AOOR - ’ ''jOOz’-^O Vii.CYCNET PLOHNER NAME v->EUGENE C'.OETERLING » HIFETAXPAYER ‘i.l.l EUGENE CiOETERLINGNAME/AOOR.V'. 2AOICYCNET PLACE55556 0025 ^PROP AOOR '^V.OiioO-.y,'RIDGEWOOD CIR •OWNER NAME hfcFRANK'rJ,* PATRICIA K ROUTSON ’< TAXPAYER ^V^i‘'FRANK'J ROUTSON NAME/ADOR V::,SIOO RIDGEWOOD CIR ' j' LONG LAKE MN 55556 ;?*. :J/: -;56:-,0A-ii7-25 2A 0005 PROP AD0R‘!'“»j' 00555>J;?OLO CRYSTAL DAY RO S OWNER NAME ViiHARY D,RYERSE TAXPAYER * ^;-MARY 0 RYERSE L.■ ; NAME/A00R^-:i555; OLD. CRYSTAL DAY RD S -i',.•/ *tivLONC LAKE MN . ji .. ••.•'Viy,ti5e!;0A-II7-25 55556 2<* 0006 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD SPROP ADOR .\ ti,00275 V:OLO CRYS OWiER NAME > *|c’ R' « D K COFFIN ' TAXPAYER CORDON A DARDARA COFFIN NAHE/A0DR . «5025 WATERTOW RO f ' </^>';^ORONO MN ; 55556 ■'■#'•••'i !>•• •; J*'-'' '*1 •• •I ,•.r'.. \V 'vise?;. 0A-II7-25 51 0012 PROP AODR !'^00A60 .’V SUSSEX LA OIWER NAME . VN W « 0 C W1L0I1AN \ TAXPAYER . ijNlNA W t DONALD C WILDMAN HiHE/ADDR .i 7A5 SPRING 1‘ILL RO 55591 V •* . . '-MWAYZATA MN ! :.1 •,I. •4 ' ■ ''‘Ci'.i*-’ •t;. i - ;»•:'•1'- ■ •'■/b’;V,'»-38H'0A-117-25 62 0016 PROP AODR l-'jj 02790WHITE OAK CIR . OWNER NAME fjP-* M DOHERTY . TAXPAYER V. .t( p^^TRICK J DOHERTY 1.■NAME/AOOR 2790 WHITE OAK CIRCLE V.55556 t * •••..<•» ’j.-’l '-F4-7.J;, COUtJTY property INFORIIATION SYSTEMPROPERTY 0»«FERS LIST 'JO 06-117-25 25 002105180RIDGEWOOD CIRLOREN GROSS TRUSTEELOREN GROSS0609 LYNOALE AVE SBLOOMINGTON MN 55620 36 06-117-25 25 0027 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO H W « S J LAUE HERMAN W S SHIRLEY J LAUE 596 PARK LANE LONG LAKE MN 55556 ' I. 30 06-117-25 26 0006 00605 OLD CRYSTAL DAY LEON G WARMER , .WAROLLLDALEU ' RD S UO li•r/I 60590' OLD CRYSTAL DAY LONG LAKE MN 55556 RD 38 06-117-23 26 0007 00595 SUSSEX LA N I' » 0 C WILDMAN MINA W & UOMALO C WlLDtlAN 765 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA MN 55591 30 06-117-25 52 0010 05050 SUSSEX RO \ N W « 0 C WILDMAN •* " NINA W & DONALD C WILDMAN 765 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA TttJ 55591 \ 38 55-nO-25 55 0001 05020 WATERTOWN RO R A STUBBS ETAL RENA M STUBBS 3020 WATERTOIBI RO LONG LAKE MN 55556 38 06-117-23 25 002203150RIDGEWOOD CIRJAMES D DRINOLEY ^JAMES 0 BRINDLEY '5150 RIDGEWOOD CIRLONG LAKE MN 55356 ■i.' r •V*. ■. i'J'.iif:":REPORT »ra/ pi65560i'-;;ii-’S^.! • •; •. • V; :; ?; fi. 38 06-117-23 26 0002 »- 00225 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO PEARL DEtOTY ET ,AL , PEARL DEtJNY • 225 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S 2 ^ LONG LAKE MN 55356 * 30 06-117-23 26 0005 '.vVY'. 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO i’i STATE OF MINN ' i ’ . ''Ve' '' ’ V-i t STATE OF MINN (ONR) «LUCE LINE TRAIL) iiPIIwii Wmm '*s'. r. i*' • »*» *•I j! 30 06-117-23 31 0001. 0C625 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RO W S P LAWTON OR WILLIAM G LAWTON 625 SO 010 CRYSTAL LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 06-117-23 32 0011 , 00655 SUSSEX LA N H 8 D C WILDMAN NINA W 8 DONALD C WILDMAN 765 SPRING HILL RO WAYZATA F«4 55391 30 55-110-25 56 00055 WEAR LA I WEAR ENTERPRISES D TO:Jeanne A. Mabuslh. Building & Zoning Administrator FROM:Stephen Weekman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:June 9, 1994 SUBJECT:Application ni'1933 Tandem Properties - Septic Review I have reviewed the proposed septic system testing and design for this property and would make the following comments. Due to newly defined wetland areas, the drainfield sites must need different setbacks than normally required. Wetland classification identification and delineation were performed by Franklin J. Svoboda & .Associates which indicated Type I and II wetlands not previously located on the City's wetland inventory maps. The City's inventory' maps designate primarily Type III. IV.or V wetlands which have standing water during much of the year. .As the Type I and II wetlands do not contain standing water during the growing season, drainfield sites must be located outside of the wetlands, however the normal 75' setback will not be required for these wetland areas. Site evaluation and septic system design were performed by S-P Testing for the second phase of both Dickey and Coffin sites. All soil boring holes have been located on the surveys of these properties. .All drainfield sites on both properties meet the required lot line, driveway, well and wetland setbacks and are located on slopes less than 67c. Based on the information provided. I would recommend approval of the application. ch Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Enginters & Architects June 14, 1994 C?w Q ftZOfZ W • #r»ec^ C tf m*-via l Vy.Aj Otrry t Ccc«. •! t FC G W^u.'Kr't. Pi Swur M f:;r*ir, c •S€^ Cc<-’ Ho^re A Pi •c^?' A Oorxjrx •£ t PY^ »f O' •ewer »t Otv^d O »*E •cow C A t A .rry A fouacA pf A Mj-ior PE Vf jr T i4j*rnjrr< •£ « Pf^. PC '■•'Orn#i t Anaerton A i A OCAM C Pi. A S/ia P£ *TOe^ » kfrOs»/^ P| vn#fi Pi Vx-4^1 • PfJ PF A^rxi M I^ AiC P vfc' •yp'fon. PC \*CPff C P Mf f''*2 PI o AtAItcrj. PC Wow J Argfrta. PC VATf^h P ArOTfO'^ ^1 Mf 1 9 V*i »i Mfri A itiX Pk Qsy w siontrv PI PfOl J Of ^ncA A j A J Fogpwon. *C A Peit W'-PCI Pt P^*0 J P£ VJ « O pp M 5 pp I ^*1PP0 C'fMfi p| K§*t^ I. P£ G«*v O I'nasar P| ^ p£ ^e<r I PS Do^i^iai J ier«i P£ y»^n 0 Gaitj^o*^. PC Cfc >0 PC G P| JOhA P OOAJff PC CPfPPI A tJXKJOn LfV V Pfy»T'My M C »CP ^fr*i > ligfW^fOt Ms. Jeanne A. Mabuslh, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Tandem Properties File No. 139-1901 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the most recently revised preliminary grading and drainage plan prepared by Coffin & Groeberg, Inc. for Tandem Properties. The recent revisions to both phases 1 and 2 have been minor changes in the lot lines, septic sites and pond design. ITic plan is acceptable from an engineering stundpoint. The final plans must show how the drainage will be handled on Lot 3, Block 1, on the Dickey Parcel. ITie preliminary plans do not show how the existing 24” culvert will be extended past the proposed trail, or how the ditch drainage from Old Crystal Bay Road will be routed to the propo.scd pond. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. •y-i-aK »»/..*-JA • St. Pj^uI. MN S51I3 • 612-«36-4600 r CITY of ORONO RESOUTION OF THE CITY COFNCIt. NO. _3JL-2JZ___ \ resolution PLAT Of CRYSTAL BAY ROAD .ADDITIO. file no. 1901 YVHERF-AS. ihe Cicy of Orono U a n-.unicipal ccrporaiion organ.aed and e.x,sling under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and -1 aK fSt> CHv of Orono has atlopied subdivisionWHEREAS, the Cry Conned ot ^ Ci ot regulations for the orderly, economic and sate dc .e.opmenme oru^'iiY. ----------- subdivider''); and allow Its use as a single tamily residuK. to ne . . variances; 1. yy-lIEREAS. the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platt.ng regulations of the City, including: r-me-ion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 3415. the resolutton "SiTpretoinap.- approval of the Cass HI snbd,vision. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. Dedication on the plat of nght-of-way for public roads shown as Countryside Drive \Vesc and Watertown Road. creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlet E to be hnown henceforth as Deer Run irail. .• rv,- nrrvTfp Foud the subdividor has dedicated toConcurrent wuh the creation ot this the Cit>' 3 road ana utility easement = ^ubdivider has created imptovement and utiUty easements over said ourlot in non-exclusive ingress, egr .“r of covenants, conditions. « -♦. Paae 1 ot ; \ CITY of ORONO RKSOLLTION OF THF, CITY COl^CIL NO. 842? 8. 9. 10 11 (ransfcrred and conveyed together with an undivided 1/10 interest in said road outlet wherebv beneiitting lot owners covenant and agree to permanently maiiuain and pay cost of maintenance tor said private road. Ihe subdivider has also created certain maintenance covenants wherein each ot the abutting lot owners adjacent to the public road Countr>side Drive West covenants and agrees to maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said public road while it remains a cul-de-sac road and not a through road connecting to Willow Drive. The subdivider has dedicated to the City a temporary road and utility easement over the area of the cul-de-sac not included within the 50’ dedicated right-of-way of Countrv'side Drive West. The .‘••ibdivider has dedicated to the City drainage easements over all detention areas, w-etlands. and drainageways within the plat providing for limitations on the use of these areas and shown on the plat as drainage easements. The subdivider shall create private covenants covering the upkeep and maintenance or all drainage facilities. The subdivider has created protective covenants tor all lots containing protected wetlands not included within conservation maps of the City of Orono and the areas defined as mitigation area. Covenants have been drafted to include metes and bounds descriptions of the art .s and maps deilmng the location of these areas within each lot. Dedication to the Citv of a bicycle trail easement along the east side ot Old Crvstal Bay Road located within Blocks 2 and 3 and a pedestrian trail easement located within Blocks 1. 2 ana 3. Dedication by deed ot Outlot tor public use. E.xecution of a subdivider's agreement providing for the installation ot certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval as follows; a.Detention ponds and drainageways. b.Private and public roads. c.Erosion control. Page 2 of 4 *I x» r CITY of ORONO KH^OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIE ONO.___O0 4 27 f. w 1. Bike trail and interior pedestrian trail '^rily within Dicke> parcel). Removal of all structures within Outlet Removal of all accessory strucrares on Lot 1. Block 1 that do not contonn to required setbacks from newiy defined lot lines. Cleaning/upgrading of e.xisting ditch that runs along the Luce Line adjacent to Coffin property. Replacing existins IS" culvert (to the west of the intersection of Luce Line and Old Crvstal Bay Road) which is in disrepair with a 12 ’ opening at inlet Install a second hisher culvert through Luce Line to act as an overtlow or lower elevation of the Luce Line at this location providing applicant's plans meet the requirement that slope is no greater than r:^c. Installiii2 a new culvert under the horse trail in the area by the pond south of the Coffin property. The subdivider has posted a Letter of Credit in the amount ot 5 j08. i2_.d0 to ensure that these required improvements are completed to City s satistaLtion. Pavment to the City of a park dedication fee in the amount of 525.468.00. Payment to the City for the legal re-.iew and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of 5200.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Old Crystal Bay Road .Addition. Hennepin County. .Minnesota. subject to the following conditions: The ^ubdlvider shall fence off the following drainfield sites prior to construction of roadway and drainage improvements and this fencing shall 'oe maintained in place until lots are developed; Lots i-6. Block 2. Lots 5-/. Block j. ots Block 4. Er<.sion control shall be installed as shown on preliminary grading and drainage plans and maintained until natural groundcover is restored. 12. 13. 1. Page 5 of A : o „ o CITY of ORONO RESOI.irnON OF THE CITY COUNCll. NO. Eno;necrin» plam for pobiicu ^ .Xnri ''‘•rations involvinc» road imurovemeius can begin. No buildin^ wrlrb; ilsl U.U.I a., -drarnage facUincs have heen inaralled and approved, and a saiisfactor>' road base conrplevLd. r •“ —™' capacity. The des.r.. -d wetland wtthm Lot 7 , Block 4 must be staked and erosion control installed prio'r to the installatton of a dr.veway to the stte ot •'>" Vte future owner must obtain the required permit Irom the MCW D as tt v 1 b. leX^Ttu fill a protected mitigation area with the construction ot the drive. • , , U M Ka. r.Hii hv rhe Citv of Orono wiih either the Hennepin6,The 4forcsmd plat b' j-^ ?r:Xm::th:r\vhm a'ceniLd original copv of this resolution and executed copies of the easements, deeds and covenants noted above. The approval granted by JpplITaiio’n'with the'City date specified above. In that event it will be necessao » t le a n PP of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 2.ird day ot May. llin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Mayor Dorothy .M(CT^ni STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 'i ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )May. 1994 The foregoing instrument ^^ity Clerk of the City of Orono. a bv Edward J. Callahan and Dorothy • ■ ‘ ‘ ' ... .executed on behalf of the City. Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executvu t notar Wu^buc ^'- y? Notarv Public 4 ot 4 »•»!(• •• .... •. •• ,, , l . ,• I � It # I '·. 0 i 0 •• I I. I I. •·1> '/.) I: . p' •,,·�-'I. t ./ I !'I I I "1- 4 ✓,,,.., � 1' ' .. ', I • . OLD -.r • ., ., .. , ' :. ' :J .. i ,, .,., ... r' . � . . > . , · ...... .... . . . \ ,, .,,,.. • . . . . j_ f-- I I:• • I --- ), I, �, . , ' . ': # ' .... ' •• t ....... '.. .. f . ... 0. ... • •} ,i- ., .. ---,, . ' • .; ., . I .. '• • • .:-�, ' -. ' ' . ... ', , . - . : I • I ... ,. . BAY ROAD ,� .. , �-.. ,.,,• .. -�, ,. .., • • • • i • .,J ,•,'... B ) • ·I '1. ,.•✓-··II I• --- • I I I . , . '· 11 , _, . , . . . •• \ r\. r ' ... ' - . ,. ... n , ,. .. , .. --,_ .•. ,.,-..,...· . ,,.,. __ .,_ ___ _ , • .,,,,. '-,,•�•• I ·� .. \ ' , ....,,. --. . ,..J"·• n . .. '• .' ·-.'-• fl ::, 'l . .. •.:. .... ! . . . ADD TIO l N fl • ' w .nr .. -__i--; _ __. BER SHEE f '2 OF 5 S INC OLD CRYSTAL BAY R ADDlTl^^.'l !r,7 DOC IJO 0^ m t ' IH*; ]' ....... V t\'L..7- ... I 'Vvf -Rj; i arA 01/Jo- ^ 15la ''MW .^-r- . "V WTf^ l_a-V - ;/ L.. / ,v.. aiwr' rr ^7 “^r • iQ 4 i P »V 4 •• V 3 ••» U V [ JCOUWtRYlUOf .'J W >-1 ■- V \A\ ^.. TtSi^L \\Ftaif^TB Hp^ -WMU •«4MS n» •««« >it II «* k— - >'•J I \ m ^ ^ •m •< cciFKjLCroABiRa, Inc m* ♦* ••« ■-* r r-v:.-::/'^ „ ri>n,v.-‘St7Vt:V, lii PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES OF OUTLOT A. COUNTRYSIDE MANOR 2ND ADDITION. A tract a . R. L. S NO. 10B9 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA c -’----------- dici Tey parcel PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES OF OUTLOT A. COUNTRYSIDE MANOR 2ND ADDITION. A TRACT A. R LS^NO 1089 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA f»- 411 ■4WI I Nil I « ft M •« f« . t'1-.UL-Y \ r F='.ii^F•^ir^r \\\o< D noAO'liHV VM-MfiT. “ i ' ■N: .'- - , A\ h\ \ V ■•••' - ' ' H TT/V . 0 ! PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOH TANDEM PROPERTIES IH AUDITORS SUBDIViSlOR MO. 230 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ■• \%\ '"• .yr^'■■ rpMATe TVai/ •,.V \ \ •'/'■v^’’ ' '' •__J_1 \\J . Y.-,\v\I ««•«* »*«•«••••• •««»« #•. ••• •« ta.» rnci #•••• «• • #•••• COFFIN PARCEL ll\C, , 4. •"% proposed subdivision for TANDEM PROPERTIES IN AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 230 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA >4WI I c;; £It AT 0 • 1 SN ,.v\^-'<'>i^';;" M,|h 51 r,r------ -•»»IH Ii 0* ' R.L.S. •\‘" 'M ;r''V j):fV - V?..■ o ..\\\ -y\J l \ t'.'5 V-‘’''o -•• -.1 ' - • v 'A ^ /'''/A'f*; ‘ \m' \ v ^'-X ‘Wv’ ^ J \>'-X I ''t ' <*•/#•/'<1 *’h . l!H - ..'i j 7*74 7 'a '»o suoi ^n * \ py^v-.4 UtC2^M:j , >,..•. X ■\ l*f------ / It t* it / \ .tttl_ .i/f r. a :/.i I Ml II fi I 4 I 1^^UJi___ 1 r 1 k * r A-i/ #/ / r# A *< *i V »t U ■'7\ O ^ o------ro I • \ l•lll I > AiU ( 'j I'll* ■r . hit i:.i --------------- \ t -% r 1 /? Vy ( 94 ; )■- t L t V J itft . .tt0^#/# •till 9 Iz ^ r '<y __________/•*. to O \ t., »*•> ** PAY -noAo -----a— i (> / *oi OJ fi 7ifff A‘rt ^ H..o. !Tii f\> i>i TO ' /-'“I;, XiV R.L.S. NO. 1089 V : -,_n;_;£ -J *4 5 f 0 •f-Jj D Ay I "I' •1 J-‘ : 1 • r : ^ L/T c I. ' I- ,;- O' ■v' .V i-j• « -V D -rr.-'-. ft.; * ;A ;/ %'^f<in«. nh '■fev%-j 1’y' : j ‘ ^ (1 m * (j [•; '-I t : *• (j (j >>:: |t f.‘ a ii :.'t < >r* r : 3 :j U <; : j '; Iw o o y'o cr, C j a «'#iT i ... \ f . J *-■t- , ■■' ). — v'- f' a. rZ U> D a. = ; ji-i'. If *».,: '■ ■ "va: ’i;v- r i-^v-Sn-r' '■'If M /•;'.>H '■' 'P"^--------^ %,f . ! <iSa. BASIN - RASIN ():^mrm ; n ■ W{ '" r-V; . YM.\ ‘* r'vfii ' r'- jwSfim!:; i?Pi 7i ^ f ■‘',a ' *'• • . ‘*; ■ y\ i --S . • y ♦ • • V , 4 I ■ 7 jA- '■*• <ava.>-. ’ 1 Pi W' Km'f B1 V fepMsa Um iiy[l'^ jSSPr*;’? i> ■' ? '. r,‘:;'Av;'' 'S>’■.'• v-r \‘ :v.:-#*»•* m B®ll -‘"■’-'■firi pa,? iiii ’.*• f^-'•; • a* *%l]9 mmmKEi . A. ■.>!- >i • i \\ ,• •h. /-w ' mMSBh-;!k,'* #ll3v'* '< / 'I P* j JUEDHR VV^'- ■ .;7|. w>v-; . ..;.-V 'vp-' 'IT: '^sk\A. tel siif' .-li i'v.i;Pili^»i ■ ■* ■•■ *'/• • V ; f4 j • & ^ ;)y.-'‘ I ,'l' <vw^lkM'u ’" , •' . ■> ,v.vy •Ai'^i-'.'^.-r ■„.-»... . _*w'. / .■'■>JA W •i}i.'-:it V M ]i" ■■ CtJ f^ •y' a •>“' "•Y. .-V . .- *> ^vA# ^-4 ^R^Pi?SS ,• ’Ani' '♦ < i C;. ;-‘-:f r/' wi*«^ <1 IK ^ilTO n -1 S' in <oo*ou.tv) ?P to O O CPto f> => z on p fD □L P D D- CO Pcn D in o C2. CL Q K to o Ci) o o. fp r>o uy O t3 CL O rp tJ (P to on o ?3ozo >z.u m O 13 pao “0m pa m in WMmmmii*.vv> ^ i r. V9^K tSSSt 9 ’ 7 I 'V ^ »• ■■*•.;> ;•■{■ MaMRI i k*L.:- •■'iNJ' • ' ' ;^ • •>wm H’» ■=-'fe- A I, \ f' - ’ •’ . ' , Hj . . ‘ ' ‘ i . ' /V ‘^ » *i'v •'. : , feSsVirt#}?'' c V-f I •;-'fe;.v3.. -.'vl-■:' ■ /*! r? >* 1 1 % \ ^ { ■ >:S / t____ WILLOW DRIVE S ? * received JUN 9 WM g(jY OF ORONO June 7, 1994 Orono Limited Partners 2765 Casco Point Road, VVayzau, MN 55391-9798 Ms. Hlen B. Sones, Dist. Admin. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345-8244 Re: Statement of Commitment Permit #/94 14 Dear Ms. Sones, 130 acres. 46 lot single family development m the City of Oron . O,o„o urn,... I-™- vein assist in design imd monitoring °f invited wetland design and construction standivds. M.C.W.D. m hiTptt the wetland construction after rough grading and alter revegetation. The weUands tvUl be protected -tl- drmnag^atid^^^^^^^ as required by the City of °Jb^®‘'^^irmon^ the wetlands Orono Umlted Partners, and ° J'J;,hc wedands ^ ^^“rrrqr addtio^U will repair for the M.C.W.D. for 4 years by the developer and consultant. Richard Putnam, Partner Orono Limited Partners cc.J. Mabusth J.Yanta F.Svoboda r TANDEM PROPERTIES_______ HKOKFRS • nr \ WE RS • DEVEl OrhRS James L. Osienson Richard A. Pumani Mr. Joe Yaiita St. Paul District, Army Corp of En^’incc^s 190 Fifth Street Fast St. Paul, MN S510I-1638 June 2, 1994 Re: Permit 94-02434-NVV-JJY Dickey-Coffin silos DciU* Mr. Yanta, I am responding to the Corns' May 13, 1994 permit letter - Determination: 33 CFR 330-App.A, Nationwide permit In discussing the provisions of tlie Corps permit wlili you, I said the reduction in proposed fill on lots 17 iind IS block 2 of the Dickey site would create a potential problem for construction and the permanent utalizations of the lots. The attached exhibit A illustrates the proposed fill reduction recommended b>’ the Corps in tliG 5/13/94 permit. As developers of the site, we are concerned about the feasibility ol maintaining wetlands in very close proximity of homes, 'fhe proposed fill reduction would come within 15 feet of the proposed home site on lot 17 and 25 feet on lot IS. Our experience indicates that these distances are not workable for either die homeowner or die wetland. We believe that a 50 foot minimum is necessary for a reasonable tmnsition. As you know die fill mea proposed on these lots is in Pasin la, a fs pe 2 reed canar>' grass and disturbed community, degraded, semi-permcment wetkuid. Figui-e 5-1 from F.j. Svoboda & Assoc., Inc. 7/29/93 report illustrates the area. Our development approach in this ai'ea w'as to minimize the encr-oachment by shifdng roads mid building sites while prote'-iing the better qualit\’ Type 1 and 2 wetlands in the area. You will note the I'oad alignment for lots 19, IS. 17, 8, 9 10 cur ves betw ’een Iv'pe 1 wedands on eiiiier side of the street. We believe the site plan does a good job minimizing wetland disturbance. 2765 Casco Point Road • Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 • Office cX F-ax (612) 471-0573 7808 Creekridge Circle • Suite 310 • F3Ioomingt<’n, Minnesota 55439 • Office (612) 941-7805 • l-'ax (612) 941-7853 We ask Llie Corp to consider an enlargeineni of tlio till to the limits proposed in exhibit R. The amount of fill is reduced by .25 acre frc')in the original plan, 'fhe Corp's proposed fiil boundaiy reduced the fill by .4 acre. The additional .15 of an acre of fill will pro\ ide a reasonable separation for wetland and home construction. In summary' we ask the Corp to revise its permit to allow an additional .25 acre of fill in basin la from the approved permit of 1.78 to 2.03 acies for tlie total 130 acre site located in Orono, Minnesota. I /o]-1, 7 1'-2 . I ,: I I ' ) I I . I )o 1• ,.- �-J, ··--j -·· ""' I ' -______ .. - ••.. - �• I �� �-J-,., ( 2 .. ·�. , -·--.. ----·--�·1 I, 5 I ' t p-3 I �.c;/ J ---- . -• I 3, . •..,'?? if. ] 0 ! )rJ �-� I �-If -<..{.-,-(-I. � ••� ��� Jo J ---==�:.=:-=:-=· ·-==-== --�--=:.... .. , ·-----. ••✓ , . .,_ _, --. ----- 1 0 ' 0 � ( .' 9 J ,ff •, I / I ]'o I • '( 1. 2 fjj;_[_ •• t., I J_o -,.,0 '---, I ,. ( . ' I ·----- , , i ) --\ I! c )' -r.---. I __ J J \ ) ,s � , 0 , . N . � '-u... • • • , ' �I , I q , I , I I , • • • (/') 0 ::r: �r 5 '� z ,,. " . '' -... . ·- . .,. ' -., ', .,, .7 tC-1, . -. ' I ,,,, / I o l -------- ,.·. I ,..,. ., ,. , -· ,ROAD. . .}K'J'J , I /?-3 •"^^'3 *A/KU,‘vJ-R.i){f‘-l2 >U.04.x ----------------^.'^Zu < 1 h2 '•. ft li ra-iW "X ■- r •.' L-:C- ^''N ' V_______t^'-------------------i,:- /?-i-■'•i!Vc/r. 9 f ; 'i 7.l:eui4M I I 4ir, Jr 1 ------ \ -----------• -*-t- ^3of,~- 25i-i f f At /■ i5 ’l.r:7^ '15^ ^ ' < r \ / r I /• /&!• I X,V y./'. y -<# -y.-'-.... 79 V ^ \X \ \. I 5«\ ’4j \ / r. 'x ' ^ /cf.' tjy.r ■ / r / ^'i'c;i, ./*f*! JO •^ I ,V % % ^ \p*’-» i------ , --------------- !X-(UJ rr/'f i ' - -W '^ / / ' ' 'f v<«‘'*':..".?/v-|^ / ^V/>cr 2L IV miM CLASSEN 3.5 C.f.S.WA'1 Z A T A ,1 C.F.S.. . . LC -2IL. >-• \.� ... __/'.� �; -G oc ' --' _J\J I RY ' -,"'ft / I:: I I I I I I ,: . • . . "-. \.LC -3 ( J L ._./ \ LL -1 ,:LML�E . 'I . /----- O c.,.s. � ..._ \ ,------, i i ,' i G V�� \ / L c -4 •� · .. "ti--.,\ ./.. \ 37.>-74. -----.-· :1 �l\ (LC-5 KE r . . ..,,,,, .. _.,,,,--\.. ..F.S . S T B-6 ·-----�, FRL-?. MB -1 ' • I li -_./1-�/ /. _41r/s. ,/ �B -2 FR L-1 t;;,c. " ..\ TL -12 ' / ::ii::uFR L -3 \ ) 20.6 C.F .S .�� ...-·"I ...F R L -4 '-.. \ . -'-'\ 131�6 \,.t .\.9.9 c.F.S. . l '-OL II""----1� •\\ LL-3 \ (J .. ......... : •. .--_.::.-.... • �-Ii-.. -,_ -�· (.f.S. LON �-C.F.S. :�ONG LAKE -! --, :···--•I ' -�uf, '-..._ r-:1n'• 1 ;::--.;.a,, ] I i;j -.- � ;;:?7 , ?''R:' ---� 0. .f.S. . • ' \ ►f7'��i /!NE. .T L -11 �7 �l9•�.f .JDR \" : r•"�I• . . . -5 5. 6 c.F. �, . .,________ /_ ----_,. , -•·-=----<'-' tit.. • • • ,-:/ -:,,,,,-----"" • .�C .f .S . \ -� ~ T L - 1 3 --, -�I58.4 C.f.�-� 5 .. ---..---.. .. /. · � •'--.. __TL -1 O · ) lt'yt\ �r . . I'•. .L--....__\ " (----/-7'\-� ��· \ ( l -,.__-.... TL-16 j TL· 15 c:-::.----�� ��---�:-�I -. ; 1(4•1 c.F.S. 1TL -1 4 \ ��1 rr: 88-10. . "-··· ...'-· •w :3 � i?4 1 n s ....___ ./ f em � S'I .) \ e t ' ...• • T L-19 � ---<s "� , .. ._._' •... • �, •S O UTH WI L LO W DRI V E • ---. -... -' ' .. .. 0-� .. .. .... .' ... .... f . . .... " . .• ' 4 ••..) '• -,,,o r ✓-½---­---------- )I( "' •• •• •• •• • • •,,a., J _, / /---------/ / ----- \J -----,-' , / _, , I 006, 6 • • .,, . , )( •• ,,,. ••I � :::ZN •■♦e 4 :; ( ] �----' I L ----• [� f , ) [ l f _j [ ] ' c::=:, 0 0 t • 1,_t( COW(91 SWAMP CAf( WAl L eu It DI MG co•c•c, E st •1 ltf CRf A f I Otl COUii I '... Uflllf, IOI e IAILIOAI SIMftl .1 ••lllOAD SVI fCN 0 111\.TD c_,_ -Wl ■f. � Clllflll.... ,,. ,--JJG\, -1 WI c., .. <:::::, ,,,,,.-------ONCUIIID c••­ '"' llltaf 1• ,. < ,p J,,, )( . • - • . • - • • • • • � a..... )C - !>;:■ ii io:r.\A 1.«♦« 4i>.»»•• i i 2. cofmatg K 1.WMMid 10 •; Lot t. BloeK 1. DMi ^ WMknd to a; Lot 1. Hock 1, For Pond 3.VMIlMd Oc; Lot 9, Bloek 1, For Boom 4.WiaMid • d; Lot 6, Block 1, For Boom 9.WMknd 0 b; Lot 19, Block 1 8.WMkndB b; Lot 14, Block 1 7.WMknd 11 b; Lolo 11,12, Block I brood 8.WMhmd 11 o: Lot 11. Block 1 brood a MITIQATBD 411848 1.LcM.Btockl 2.Lot 2, Block 1 3.Lol0 2b3,Block1 4.Lolo 9 b8, Bloek 1, NowAroao 9.Ldo 8 b 7, Block 1 8.Lot 19, BlDCfc 1 7.Lot 8, BlOCfc 1 8.1«laB,t2,13, Block 1, a Ldo 11,12,Block1 10.Ld 20, Block 1, 11.Ld 17, Block 1 TotMOdllbOda 1.884-0.98 •2.77ocroo TddMlBdOd * 3.23-1'2.73 -9b8ocroo Total 0.19 acrw 0.32 MTif 0.04 acm 0.07 acm O.oeacraa 0.13acr«t O.OOacrva 0,04 MW 0.98 acTM Total 0.11 0.15 0.13 0.79 0.30 0.06 0.20acraa OJO 0.19 0.20 OJUL 2.73 1 U2'11 94 1«:U9 KA\ tfl;i 47.i 'jiMii A>‘.ilOh >«. It.viiti ^ 4IH, * COFFIN A ORONBERG. INC.ft-4^^ I TANDEM PROPEIITIES VVEUANO MmOATION SUMMARY FEBRUARY 10,1994 1.DiCKEVanE 1 .VMMMd 1 b; L0M9. Block 2 2.WWlHid 1 c; Lot 9, Block 2 4 rood 3.tAMM1 a: Lois 17. IB. Bkxk2 9.¥IMM 14; Lot 2. Block 1,4 rood 2.Lot 19, Btock2 3.Lolt1B419.Blocfc2 4.Lois 19 417. Block 2 5.Lat16,Btock2 6.Lots 3,6,6,13. Block 2 7.Lol1,8tock2 B.Lots 1-6. Block 1 ToM O.l2acrio 0.3BKrot 1.11 scroo o.ieacrsi QAi ■ 1 OAB scroo 0.17scrso 0.1B scroo 9.16 sens 0.16 0.19 0.3B Ul 3.23 % Jki MINNEHAHA CREEK ^ WATERSHED DISTRICT |l^ 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard ^ Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345-1597 erne*: (tia) t3M320 toi: («12) S3Se244 nSTMCTAOeiMTSATOa: ElwB. SoflM •OASOOMIANAQCIIt: ThainMMwa. Jr . Pr«i«C. Woodrow lM*JoMiE. ThomM Cadaen LMw • TYioniM w. UBoiMir • Manna S HaitM • Pamiit 0. Bid Uk«l MMMtTOWU 0WWMOMV ml'/Vk S4^l afplieeati Loeatieai 274S Casen roiat aeaS Wayaata, Ml SS3ft It': I City of Orooo« T117, 12J, Sae. 4, ME i aw 1/4 Stecawatar iavelaiaf aabdiviaiaa aad watlaal replaeaaaat plaa of 44*lot aeaidaatial Dear Mr. Futnaau It the reeularly scheduled April 20, 1994 neeting of the Board of Managers, the subject perait application was reviewed along with the following exhibitst 1. 2. 2. 4. 5. Perait Application 94*14 received Decaabar 3, 1993* wetland Claasifieationa, Identification and Delineation leport received Dacaaber 3, 1993. Letter froa applicant's representative received Deceaiber 14, 1993. Letter froa applicant's representative received January 24, 1994. WCA sequencing and replaesaant plan infocaation received February 9, 1994. of disturbed wetlands received February 10, 1994. Area 1 Drainage Suaaary received February 11, 1994. Area 2 Drainage Suaaary received February 11, 1994. Mitigation Suaaary March 7, 1994. replaceaent plan application received March 7, 1994. nitigation cross sections received March 7, 1994. Area 3 Drainage Suaaiary received March 7, 1994. Area 4 Drainage Suaaary received March 7, 1994. vwir designs received April 19, 1994. grading, drainage and nitigation plana received April 2S, 4.Suaaiary 7.Revised S.Revised 9.wetland 10.Wetland 11.Wetland 12.Revised 13.Revised 14.SkU■Mr IS.Revised 1994. Psniit AppXicAtiof; No. 94*14 Hoy 3» 1994 P«9« two Action woo tokon opproving your poroilt oppl loot ion ponding rocoipt ond otoff opprovol of tho following oxhibitot 1.Irooion control for oil construction ontroncos. 2.StotOMnt of CosBiitMnt rogording success of tho roplocoswnt plon. 3* IsMrgoney overflow dotoil for second cell of Areo 3 pond. The following conditions shell be pieced on the permitt 1. 3. The stormwoter ponds shell be constructed prior to performing the other site groding. The stormwoter ponds shell be re*excovoted to design elevotions ofter the project hoc been cos^ibted to ensure permitted sediment storoge copocitie%. Pleoee be odvised thot the project is net outherioed until the obove hos been submitted* ond you hove been notified of permit issuonce. PleoM note further thot the loord of Honogers * decision to gront opprovol of the subject permit opplicotion shell not be effective until o copy of the decision hoe been publicly noticed for o period of 30 doys pursuont to the Wetlond Oenservotion Act. •incerely. ■lien 1. Sones District Administrotor SM/cr Jeonne Nobush* City of Orono Mork Oronberg* Coffin & Oronberg I 1 f , Orono Limited Partners 276S Casco Point Road. Wayzata. MN 55391-9798 June 7,1994 Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Request for June 27, 1994 council meeting 2nd phase Dear Mrs. Mabusth, Orono limited Partners wish to request that otu* 2nd phase application be considered by the Orono City Council June 27,1994, one week after the Planning Commission meeting June 20,1994. Our request anticipates no changes or problems at the June 20th Planning Commission meeting. If there is additional information requested we understand the June 27 meeting will be difficult to accomplish. Our request is necessary to allow site development, wetland and pond construction to move logically and in the proper sequence. Our site work needs to c*eal with 1st and 2nd phases concurrently because of dirt balaiKe, %vetland construction, drainage issues and efficiencies of construction. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Richard Putnam cc.M. Gronberg received JUH ^ I**' enVOPOBOMO COUNCIL [tiii:S t» « REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JUN 2 7 1994 OTYOFOMNO DATE: June 23, 1994 ITEM NO • • - ) Department Approeal: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Tlllc Building A Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1936 Charles E. Troyak, 2325 Kelly Avenue • Variance - Resolution Brief Review of Application The application involves an average lakeshore setback variance to allow construction of a 13’x33' addition to the west side of the existing residence consisting of an expanded family room area, kitchen addition, new covered porch and expanded entry. Review Exhibit L. the majority of the addition is located in from of the average lakeshore setback line. No other variances are required for this irnprovemem. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the application based on the Emdingi that the addition would have no visual impact on the adjacem residences. As stnicnire is to be placed on the west side of the existing Troyak residence, the neighbor on the east side cannot see the addition. Mature plamings along west side of residence will minimize the visual impact on residence to west. The addition will be located approximately 150* from the residence to the west. The residence structure to the west has no view windows along the east side. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planniiig Commission's unanimous recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: It or amend the enclosed staff resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO municipal zoning code SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) nLE#1930 WHEREAS, Charles E. Troyak and Mary C. Troyak (hereinafter "the appliciils-) are ownen of the property located at 252S Kelly Avenie within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 1 Block 3 TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK, and that part of adjoining vacated KellyAvemie lying notthwerterly of the northeasterly enen^ of of said lot. and southeasterly of Tract D. Registered Land Survey No. 1428. Heimepin County. Minnesott (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municq^ Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision I (B) to permit the cons^km of an ■****j®?J“? west side of the leskknce that wUI be locai^ appfOJtimately 33’m front of an average lakeshore Mtback line where no such encroachment is allowed.. Minnesota: 1 2 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City CouncU of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zonii^ File #1936. The property is located in the LR-IB. Lakeshore Residential Zoning District re<|uiring 1 acre in area. The property consists of 2+ acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June recommended approval of the variance as proposed based upon the following unique findings and hardships: Page 1 of 4 . I ^ ' A.The Troyak residence was constructed some 85 years ago, prior to development of sundards for shoreland properties. B.All cuneni standards for (tevelopment are met except for the average lakesbore setback. C. D. The house to the west has no view windows on the east side The residence to the east will not see the addition as it will be placed entirely behind ilv* existing residence. E.There is a mature woods between the residence to the west and the Troyak residence. The residence to the west is located approximately 150’ from the Troyak residence. G.Curvature of the shoreline has impacted the average lakeshore setback line 1*ljg ^ity Council finds that the conditions existing on this property ue peculiar to it and do not ap|rty generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property: would not i^ly serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate^a demonstrable hardship or difficulty: is necessary to preserve a substantial profwiy right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the fuidings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comme^ by the applicanu and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 4 1. CONCLUSIONS. ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hcieby average lakeshoie setback line located at 2525 Kelly Avenue, subject to the following conditions; Authorities granted by this resolution nin with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 27. 1995). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned ^iplicanis have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors ai^ assigns, ligfgliy agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. 3. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of June, 1994. ATTEST Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr.. Mayor Property Owneits) Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing inttiument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of June, 1994. by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor St City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesou municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public wHhinandforsaidCounty, personally appeared.----------------------------------^^^ known to me to be the person(s) deictibed in and who executed the foregoing uisttumeni, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 . before me a Notary Public whhinand for said County, personally appeared ____________________^~ known to me to be the person(s| described in and who executed the foregoing mstrument, ana fyiftmu>|f(ig^»d that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 # "M^.-i 3' •-s :■(.# i'•r- •.?-,r: W='J II ®f-i'af"mi\ .'■'m•%-i's* !i 1| Ivll ■IP ■ i!fi .'•• ■' ^,n;vav' IIm 1iiS"ilii M ■ij:rf iSi » Ml m*i| S-^lf Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Counctlmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 14. 1994 #1936 Charles E. Troyak, 2525 Kelly Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshoie setback variance required for proposed addition at west side of existing residence. Refer to Exhibit L. 2 Section 10,22. Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75' setback area Allowed = 0 Existiitg ~ 4.24% 75-250' setback area Allowed = 25% Existing = 20.49% Proposed * 21.74% 250-500' setback area Allowed = 30% Existing = 3.91% No variance required. Lot coverage is not applicable as the area of the property exceeds 1.99 acres. Lilt of ExMbits A -Application B - Applicant ’s Addendum C - Property Owner ’s List D •Plat Map E • Planning Commission Action Notice of May 16. 1994 Meetup F - Neighbors’ Acknowledgement Form (Property Owner to the West) G -Hardcover Facts H -Building Permit Application Dated 5/2/94 I Oman Letter of 5/9/94 J Survey for Building Permit 8/16/88 K -Building Permit 1000820 Zoning File #1936 June 14, 1994 Page 2 L - Average Lakeshorc Setback M - Floor Plan N - Elevations -Survey Dcfcriptioa of Request r-rr:"“r»» residence. No other variances are required. Statement off Hardship Pte«e«»iewExlubteAandB, Applies* «»«» U», folkwing unique fmdiBfs hardships: Hon«wasco««»cttd85y.«..go.pcic,«,*ecunem«MKUnbforsho«l««I development. 2.All cuitem sumtanto for devetopmenl are met except for the tveiage lekeshore setback standard. xf^ 3.The house to the west has no view windows on the pieR side. 4.Tte iteideiice on the emt will not see the etWilion as it wUl be ptoced emitely behind the existing residence. 5.There is a mature woods between the residence to the west and the Troy residence. 6.Sttff would add the curvature of the shoreline. Staff Comments In litbt of cCTttin comments made by ap^i^ to both Conned and PlantungCoiiiiiiiaaion members, staff feels it necessary to make the following comme To stairs knowledge, the first person to view the *'**^*^HSv’m i^vements was Uk Building OI^W ^ buMing permit application trevie* Ertibits H ^^ complete as tuff had advised Mr^uibiect to an average lakeshore setback improvement that the addition w^W "^^TkKaikl^ ^ Uie addition as it relates The need for the variance » not deiermuied by the location oi me Zoning File 01936 June 14. 1994 Page 3 to the lakeside of the existing residence but to the location of the average lakeshore setback line. This is why staff asked that the residence structures on either side of the Troyak residence be shown on the survey. The applicant also questioned why the City staff would have issued a building permit for an addition on the same west side in 1988 never noting need for a setback variance. If you would review Exhibits J and L. the residence to the west was not constructed at that time. Suff only needed to consider the average lakeshore setback as it related to the house to the east. If a line was drawn from the front line of both the Troyak structure and the structure to the east, the proposed addition of 1988 would have had no impact. There is no doubt that the existence of the house to the west has a major impact on the Troyak property as far as it relates to the average lakeshore setback line. As promised, staff will schedule the application before the June 27th meeting of the Council in order to expedite the review of this application. jtjci CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Iniiial Application Fee $200.00 Tf* U ($50.00 per each additional variance)|| Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 f i (DO change from original appUcaUon) Variance for non-conforming structu^ $200.00 After-thc-Fact Fees (Double application fee) property y$-33/^JcjJW av Attach legal descripti^ to^lica^rf not sT' ^■<«(roooih/year) Date Property Acquired Ort ^ ------------------------ I (do) (d^) also own the adjacent parcels of Pr^^fptopeity: presidential -----mother (speedy)------------------------------- Zoning Distria: A cw OF omo Fi 'MmE OFFICE • i 01 CE!( 200.00 CHECK n 200.00 RECEIPT-rmK YOU Address:>c:e(lw Pi4t4UAX^_^ OWNER (if differem than applicant) Name_________________________ Phn^ihamt^___ PhftnefwOTk) City:r______Zip: 5iF33L PhoneOJOine). Phone (work)_ Address:^_______________________^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Es^ C^ttu^Cost$_l^x^-------- Describe request indetail:-----—- (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width ✓Setback:Front ^ Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify)V/iWI ------------------------ Ar_ %S yrt Jnach additioittl sheets if ncceuafy)^u^Ltvu^ a^0Ji ^iw^ •• -Ku. ItdUAe. -1» -its- we*)-,-ftua' yedA.^ e»^ ^ Wtidvu* ow •bur^l/uU'weotK s>eiu/«^ ua . UtruAd. -h. ltd -ddtfW- !«•iUsUkiw. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS follnwiny Infarmarion must h*bT the aDPUcation dtadliOt fa ftCto far ¥Ouir conaidcffd CQBIPtett* 5. Completed AppUcadoa Fonn . . « — CcfSied Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtam this list from Heonepui County Department of Finance, A’603, Govt Center, 348r3271)- =.in: survey {existing and proposed elevations) if any c^gea in existing grade — are^ipised. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8W’ x 1*’ 6 Sketches or pUns of floor 4 elevauon Views (provide one (1) cw 8 A 7*— List of the legal names (include marital sums) of all i«rsons with an interest m the oroperty This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owncr(s). 8.AS addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 9 __Additional items as may be requested by City suff. The AppUcant and Property Owner must sign this applicatiM. Please retnet^ ^ XfiU Is not cnmol»«« If the ahove InfoniMtlpn hM IWtllWII IMIiiM. P'®”'** *“ inf®™*"®" “ requested by the ZoningA^M^^r anrees adSlional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payme^ incutred in review of UUs app^ and certUies that the infoimatioo supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signamre AA S^!!^r*h^y KtoJiriedges and agrees to this applicatiOT and fiirthet entry onto the property by City suff, consulunu, agenu. Commission members, and Counc members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature___________________________Date S.Ill M lisskmAppUcant *f***** have aU submittals into the City offices MeeUttg. Planning Commission Meetings are held ^SdOa^TTana^i!^ ^luible to attend a “'****.“^^ tojmve an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building A Zoning this change prior to the meeting. 8 May ll» 1994 OOR Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Jeanne, We would like to apply for a variance for our proposed addition to our home at 2525 Kelly Avenue. We understand that we need to appear before the Planning Comnisslon, whose next scheduled meeting Is June 20. Because we have a unique situation, we would like to request to appear at the optional meeting scheduled for June 6, or more preferably a special hearing. Our 05 year old home meets all the requirements for setback from the lake and for hardcover. However we understand that we need a variance because of line of sl^t with adjacent neighbors. If you were to see the placement of the homes on either side of us. It would be clear that our proposed addition does not affect either one. The house to the east of us will not see our addition. The house to the west of vjs was built four years ago and has no windows on our side, and has woods between us. We purposly planned the new addition within the confines of our existing structure, so as to avoid any question of field of vision. Our addition will be 165' from the the neighbors on the west, and 68' from our property line along the line of site, and 33' from the property line at the nearest point. The neighbors to the east will not see our addition. Because our home was here long before the other homes, we feel that we have a unique situation and would like for you to see It. In addition, we have the approval of both neighbors. Our building plans are now on hold. We have hired our builders and they await notification from you to begin. We would very much appreciate being considered for the optional meeting on June 6, or more preferably a special hearing. Sincerely, Charles E. Troyak - - pMi mnun»* ?M*U7-tl U M97•HI* nuv Ml..■3::'f.IgMWI iMtnuv ivi Mtumifi nm•U7-a 11 MMttr mn. mnr or juvwwiitr mn. mm m mimm la m KSM ,* . /r • •v* *• i • «i -l-.lv- »' \ « n M-U7-tB U Mifmm nuv im RAIWHN • J inm A • jmr ion nuv an DCfLUM Ml mni ■TV tNPOMMTXgN tVffINnaniiTv cM«n iisrn 11 Mtlotstf nuv AvtC I • N C TMVMlCIMMJt I TMVWtm RILUV AVIiNciunM Ml ramM W>U?-U It MSV•ttn nuv AVI etc NAKM amut I cAwm naiur tMf nuv AVI nctism Ml ram M n-iiv-u It Atm nuv AVI nuv » tA>ii?-ts it ranAtlAt nuv AVI N IMT JR 1 A C miTNHL MOT JR Ami nuv AVIIXCttAIAR Ml irasiM tA-UV-tl It AAMAtiis nuv an j • J rOLlN VO m tiU RtLLV AVI tNCflAIOR Ml NUl M tA*ll7*tS lA AAIA Atm nLiv An iviRm J n**wttirt I J iciimi tm nuv Avi nctiAiAR Ml ram r / '• V *^ V Mm* t* V • H-A' *. , .A. f *•>>;- f* j •:•» li. < >'» • I •.» A .f J' •_^9^1 I (t,OJNI Ollfl.Of A (55) . ... ·••·•····--------'-- - • --♦ _:,�'-- I --L--���:_: -•·•... ,..: (2 1 #1936 GlTYof ORONO Munkipal Offices StrHt Udrais: 2750 Kelley Parkway Oroflo. MN 55356 MaMiiig Mdnaa: P 0. Bw 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 May 19. 1994 Mr. and Mrs. Charles E. Troyak 2525 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, Minrtesota 55331 Re: Variance Dear Mr. and Mrs. Troyak: The Planning Commission considered your request to schedule your variance appi^tion at their special meeting of June 6. 1994 to consider a zoning amendment to B-2 Zonmg District. In a 30 vote the Planning Commission was unable to affect a legal vote. Your api^ication wm be scheduled before the Planning Commission at their June 20th meeting and staff will schedule your application before the Council at the June 27th meeting. By placing your application on the Jane 27th Council agenda, you will susuin only a two week delay than if you were approved for a more abbreviated review. You are advised to file your building permit application now so *tiat j| permit can be issued on June 28th for the proposed new construction. Prior to the June 20th meeting of the Planning Commission, you will receive a copy of tl* agenda and the staff memo reviewing the proposed variance. Please feel free to contact sun if you have any questions concerning the review comments in that memo. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building dc Zoning Administrator JAM/ch Trttpiidut Ct2) 473-7357 • FAX 475^It LI • I / l7 IJ ' ? C:«• .*• / V.# Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) ^^LH l «f [print naoie(s)) of Z^t3 i^tlu Ai/e. [print addrosj have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located tt 2K7.K fcVffyA'/fi ^ referred to as Land Use Application No._______. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement^ I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. ________sA/f /___________ Property Owner Date Prosity Owner Date I (we) Afei f i liaxlOAt'4.t [print name(s)) of ^5^5 [print addreuj have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at M/L, also referred to as Land Use Application No._______. I (we) iifftoratand that in executing this acknowledgemenc, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ^_ Date MJUu, Me ’Property Owner If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use AppUcaikm* please submit your commeois to the Building A Zoning Office at least 10 days prior ^ JL[oTk O J-^/- /•» HAKOCOVER CALCULATION MORKSHEET sgraACK zone: (ciRCLg we)(^t^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000 Existing Hardcover in Zone A.' House B.Garage , c.D riveway LENGTH -X width . S.F. . S.F. •a S.F. S.F. S.F. S f F • • • « D.Sidewalk _____ Wotfo^rfi^ W9t,QirfPf.21 c.Patio /')ecx UJ 6< Other 4.2 4.1, ZO J.J UffiL. F.U no SCAFE X AREAS S^CA ’ ^ MUNDERLAIN ▼» iV . ______________ X FLASTIC ------------ SHEETING }i,jn 9 Total Karocovm in Zoiib - Total Proferty Aru in Zone T|_ <T/ 4>fT| S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. M S.F. S.F S.F. m iO.BOOt , , Q] *100 • ^tJ L ”7 K < HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET_^^ SETBACK ZONE? (CIRCLE OME) 0-75' /^W50^ Existing H ardcover in Zone 250-500' 500-1000' A« * H ouse On Wr<r ^OtX- Wftr. ffiiir LENGTH ^0 L.f. X WIDTH .0O 2S75 StF* S*F. S.F. S.F. B.Garage . ^LACKWP c.Driveway D* Sidewalk . fr(/j Om^. /V>/ E.Patio / “Deck F.Unoscafs AREAS UNDERLAINIV , yT\fA> FUSTIC SHEETING G.Other /. C J75 Zt n Total H ardcover in Zone » Total Profertv Area in Zone Sf /S3 S70 S.F. S.F. S.F. ’ S.F. /i^O $.r. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. // /af S4.2»0 . ^Q_^!!s2££L— * M® " “ /../W.'I ^ ^.S*.2aa *v.ffJ ' .. • ' .. •HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ----- • . / SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE OHE) 0-75' 75-2so60-sol0 500-1000' � EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONI •• A, · House ___ • __ x _____ • ___ • ____ s.,. LENGTH • WIDTH -----X ----- • __ • ___ ·s.,, .. -----X -----• -----S,F,• / ----- X ----- • -----S,P', C.,,,Ol,J( • wAt. 1. u,-., a.GARAGE _____ x _____ • _____ s.,. ��TOPc.DRIVEWAY----- X -----. _ __..,_(.._O __ ... , . U"",,air£ _____ X _____ • --✓--�_-,_'1 __ s:,, D, SIDEWALK _____ X _____ • _____ s., . . x • ..,. • s.,. 1.GATIO/ICK X •• s., . - ,,LANDSCAPI X • ..,. ARIAS UNDERLAIN IY ' X • .. , . PL.4STIC • IHIITING X -..,. -----X ----- • ----- l,P, G, OTHIR _____ X _____ • _____ S,P. • TOTA&. HMDcovu IN Zolla - • :or�� P10,11n Aau IN ZoNI - ----�,_,91 ______ _ .[-J, 9011 •• ,. +I • I st '"""2 ,, -0�0 X 100 • __ .,,_• --ra • •• • CITY OP ORONO - BOILDIHG PERMIT APPLICATION Total Fee: $ _________ _ Entered Bya_· _________ _ Date Received: _-r.-�-!i'f Date Approved: --------- Permit ts ------- ALL J:DOM...•...AUOR MUST BB SUBNlHU DI PULL Ji.&IUPB PLAlf IIZVJ:D WILL Ba S'Sai'ZD (See Cbeclc-off Li•t Encloaed) Z.IP1 ..:rs-4 iii I ( work ):i:('.,,-,(.,£1',r � ; PBOR a C home >W· ?J.1/ 11•• .ccr,, ,_,,,, CUIIR.M..10il1 ....... �:rc:.���SIIEG.._ _______________ non, __________ _ JIAJl,IIIG ADDms, -C.Iff1 --------------------- snn r..Jc:-+na • ---------- PBOD1 I.IP1 ------ UC MJ'UCi'/IIIIGX•---1 --------------------------- JAil-lllG ADPRUl1 _____________ Ciff1 ________ IDr _____ _ ..,, -------------------ltNISTJtAUOII t ---------- i'ln a. ll»Jr1 Demo __ New__ Addition_x_ Acc•••ory Structur•�-Mcwe __•-od•l/Alte ration...::::Z--Renovate __ Land Alteration __ _ PaOIIOSD 11011Jt (de•c:ribe IIO. 0, ■PDPO:afll J --- iD det•il).,/J ./A'&,r t�• .. -'t tat · m·weij ,� .-:-.._....i1�1:, z:1•L<'�"'-.. ,:.•E.-_....1 sLm-=rlllll! -2111·a .. C1111(-... a .... _____ _ GIUCP ftltnlel I Aff. --Dr:. __ I hereby apply for a buildin9 penait and I acknowled9• tbat th• infonaatioa alto•• ia aoaplete and accurate, that the work will be in conformance with th• ordiaaao•• ar.d codea ot the City and with the State auildin9 Coder that I 11nderataad �Ilia ia not • penait and work ia not to atart without! a penait1 and cu� &JI• work w ill be in accordanc e vith th• appro•ed plan. APn.lClft' 8 ■ImftltS1 �111111 \\ //oI o\GlTYofORONO Munkipal Offices Street MtfretS: 2750 Kelley farkiway Orono, MN 55356 Meillfil M*ets: P 0. Bex 66 Crystal Bay. Ml* 55323 0066 May 9, 1994 r Mr. Charles E. Troyak 2525 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, Miimesott 55331 Re: Building Permit Application Dear Mr. Troyak: A review of your building permit application finds your prop<^ proposed addition, any new work is required to meet setbacks. V«.« n^inm afc to H ffdffit" vouT addition to meet setbacks or 2) request variance approval Ly«2?i>ropoiedloMlioii. E«fc)«d to » vuiance for your levkw. PleajtidvBe me OT your dectokm as soon as possible to prevent ftitther delays. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch Enc. Section 10.56, SuM. 16 (CK6) Variance Application Tek|»hoii* tail) 473-7357 • FAX 473-051® v\ -.3:i -.'ce icct an 0(6) n vour pi oval advise II0: -i y■1'*^-<1 •?-K V' !*’ 5 ' i* J \ ■ '»m-'*' \ ■ '‘ff K' ■ ’mm c < iSiS la ijSj^S^hSItrim IM 2PM-r.; '■1*%'MfVM V , # • I': ' ■ vh^ic “S? ' ^ .X *; ^ -■Mi' --St : •*-.•»-^■» FKinm CITY OF ORONO •»;ir f A •.•■ Mf.. . . ..< I »*• #■^< S rc AOOI^ESS •i Hv : •: ^4 : :.o ii7- OESCRIPTION: I i • • ’ • J i.mN f'tvu w T*M' Occupirtcv C .;.M^v «'uc i l K'f* *• yM* ‘ V♦ * I plan RGVI£W OM-Y Aliu 1TICK4 L.r<*i8 remarks i *« ■» # m ^ • ft w * ** 9 ‘ K.NE(:UlLt) I Ai'I-;^TAINWAV t; : ’ V *'23 • ‘.cPA*<Af;-! r-iIArU •» - .JtPGO FOr< rLUMislNij.AJ*3 P I.xLi. fc. •;V^- FE . SUMMARY;^ ^^ j ^ l.(,o . •,. * • fc » *' * , •: .. 39 \ •* 9%*t .^Cr"** ■1 aft ?'»»•»*«'<*» ■-r-i«i ^ »■*• \ 00 ___i.al-iv: V::. COriTRACTOfl! cXCGLSlOi) a4AALE ’> KiLLY AVE HN SSUl 47i-7:v5i a«^w6c?%Tn!L^*w swre Of H^So7a w'uMNe OMt MwtRWENrs. #iMMi i i i kMI fy \A*# X \fs Ct- -3? <£ ^ i(% i I f h -i I I§ fil 1^ \ V- ..fc...' .r (•• k hi- 1 \ii 4 |i \ •— ,4 _#____LA• 4 * ^ -!. T i ! '.■'I f?ht^...s. u=-7 \/v...T \ I 0 ! 4 r1 I ' » 4 ♦— s % I Ti / / 7 \LZJ L_'J r pjl^czr-D VR i c ■J} 6 ■s % \ '« ' 'f "T -y TK^h-'Vs nxM.t{Jy »i) f; » r :t. D r- "2: P, f » w:o p f *joi-r/‘‘A/var'fQ'O \ I S'- /// // 1 I - -L / / / / t / A^ ' •^ ( i-J V^. . V'" 53 S2 I i C I* \ \ T7^*~rTI \n. Tl.^ \ ’■'('r^ti I > v'l-' •*■'X •‘/ / \ 1 ^-4^. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: J ^ 7 in ' ^994 ^ttte ITEM NO.: C Department Approval: Naaw Jeiiuie A. Mibusth THk Building A Zoning Administraior Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sect! Zoning Item Description: #1939 Timothy W. Onen, 425 Turnham Road - Variance - Resolution H • Applicant ’s Reejuest to be Scheduled before the Council of the June 27th Meeting Brief Review of Application Applicant ’s property is located in the 5 acre rural zoning district. The property is 3.8 acres in area and 211 ’ in width. Applicant seeks approval of a variance that would allow ^ mstalla^ of a 26 ’x38’ detached garaged to be placed entirely in front of the front line of the structure. The accessory garage at 988 s.f. will meet the required 15 ’ side setback and 100 street setback. The hardships have been listed in applicant ’s addendum information. Exhibit A, and reviewed set forth in the sttff memo dated June 13, 1994. The proposed strurcure be constnicted of the same exterior materials as that of the principal residence. Applk;^ rt jted that the side facing the street will have a window uid appear like residential structure. Planning Commission did condition approval on plantings be proviM along the north and east side of the structure requiring that applicant provi^ a with the submission of the building permit application. PUnning Cominission also added that the plantings must be completed within a year from the date of the building permit applicatioo. Staff recommends a definite date of June 30. 1995. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of that approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the staff resolution. ( ( rto A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 9 (D) FILE #1939 WHEREAS, Timothy W. Often and Anna M. Often (hereinafter "the applicants”) are owners of the property located at 425 Tumham Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter ”City") and legally described as follows: The South four acres of the East five eighths of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 118 North, Range 23 West, Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit the construction of a 26*x38* dftachfd garage to be placed in front of the front line of the principal structure where the ordinance would require that structure be placed either in line with principal structure or to rear. Mil NOW, THEREFORE, K IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Or FINDINGS 1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1939. 2. 3. The property is located in the RR-1 A. Rural Residential Zoning District requiriiiv S acres in area. The subject property consists of 3.8 acres. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 20.1994. and recommended approval of the variance as propomd based upon the following findtngs: Page 1 of 4 If11'.j ■-.ggf;; illfit iii S»iif # 4 -‘ • "i-V %ji # Hllfiiil" 4gi -•• 34*^1 if«0-^.J# Ury:-.'4;.:-.V, m ■'■f ■vmm ■-: ^:r•:v.;; iS. .th« r««entlv installed well to the immediate north of the («v^ed conduction of » «uclKd garage to the north side of residence. B.The lot does not meet the mquUed lot width of 300'; existing at 2il’. elevations to west. D, Constiuaion to west or rear of property would tesuh in the loss of several mamre trees. result in the loss of the same trees. ., m cw c««. i™ ~ Jose a fue haiard or other danger «>^^vime a = U-spiH. am. i-e- of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. ,The City Council has considered tius ap^ication *"0*“^*?, recommendations of the Pbnning IredU,. safety andby the applicants and the effect ot the proposed variance on me ne« welfare of the community CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS ^. ^„T:isy'Si4S,is."s.tsr,‘sn: ss Page 2 of 4 2. consmiction of a 26 x38* dcuched garage to be placed 5’ in front of the front line of the existing residence subject to the following conditions: I Applicants shall provide a planting schedule upon application for a building permit. Plantings shall be required along the east and north side of the 26*x38* detached garage. Plantings shall be completed no later than June 30. 1995. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 27. 1995). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of tto resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically temiiiiate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4 The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, succe^ a^ assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Oroi» City Council on this 27th day of June, 1994. ATTEST: 3. Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor Property Owncr(s) Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The immunem was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of lime IW. by I Slahan. Jr. * Dorodty M. Hallto. Mayor * City *Minnesou muiiKipal corporarkm and said insttuineM was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this__________of_______________ withinand for said County«personaUy appeared . 199 , before me a Notary Public known to me to be the persoiKs) described in and wl» executed the foregoiiy insmiment, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199___, before me a Notary Public roc lo^Sep^ »«* who executed the fo^^ instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator June 13, 1994 #1939 Timothy W. Otten. 425 Tumham Road - Variance - Public Hearing Fertinent Ordinal 1 Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - Location of accessory structures on property. The detached stnicture will be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building. Applicant proposes a 26’ % 38* detached garage to be placed entirely in front of the principal structure requiring variance approval. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) - Accessory structures in excess of 750 s.f. but not exceeding 1,000 s.f. shall be located at least 15’ from any lot line. Required = 15’ (side lot line) Propos^ ** 15’ (side lot line) No variance required. 3.Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IA setback standards. Required « 1(X)’ Proposed - 108’ No variance required. The property is not located within a shoreland area and is not subject to hardcover controls. Lot coverage is not an issue as lot exceeds 1.99 acres at 3.8 acres. List of ExhibMs A - Application B - Property Owners’ List C • Plat Map D • Elevation - South E ' Topographic F * Se^k Map G - Survey Zoning File #1939 June 13, 1994 Page 2 Description of Request proposej the instaUatkm of a detached gange at 26’ a 38’ to be locate to tte street yaid^lii front of the ftont Itoe of the principal stniciure. The accessory garage at 988 s.f. in area w II meet all other required setbacks. Upon your site inspection, note the placemeto of detached stru^atongTurnto^ •nd rhii^a Lane Several detached stnictuics are located within the street yards of the K Exhibit D, the ex«rior garage will be of the same desig^ the CTtoStrSIriJto stiucture and will not exceed the height of the principal str»^. Tton the immediate north of this property, the property receiving the most impact from the structure. Review of Hardships Please review Exhibit A, applicant notes the following: 1 Location of new well to the immediate north of the existing residence. 2.The lot does not meet the required lot width of 300’ existing at 211*. 3.Sloping topography to rear or west of residence. 4.Mature plantings to west or rear of property. 5 Garage shall be placed in order to save majority of plantings in the northeast yard Two large evergreen trees will be removed but the remaining mature plantings will be saved. Issues for ConsMeralioa 1.Are the hardships accepttble? 2.East/street elevations of structure have not been shown. ^ there design features that should be considered — what of landscaping along cast side of garage? 3 Other issues raised by Planning Coiiunission members. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^^ § §jx ■o 3 Initial AppUcalion Fee $200.00 Mm ^ ^i J ($50.00 per each additional variance)>4^ Renewal Variance Fde $100.00 # i JLm ^jy ^ (no change from original application)FmHCE OFFICE Variance for non-confonning stnicturcs $200.00 IStCi^Ov^^ -vm /v> ^ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)i'*- -W L.0.W ' RECEIt'T'AHm'iW PROPERTY INFORMATION .^ i ii304680 COOl l^tJ0S:0- Site Address ' property Identification Number (P.I.D.)_3ilproperty Ideotificaoon rtumoer n g- it j Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey Date Property Acquired ----------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land, n__..... MAMrtv> i.X^re«idential Other ( (monch/year) Present use of property: residential Zoning District:______A A ^ A— APPLICANT Name Of XCN_— Address:^Aii City: other (specify). Phonerhotnel IL-97jTy Phone(work)___ Zio: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ___________________ Phone(bome) Phone (worW Address:City: DfSCRirnON OF REQUEST ,y^sa^Caieaxc^ Describe request indetail:F i JL— (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ Setback: ___Lot Width Front __Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshote y Other (specify) A hardship /description of unusual PROPERTY CONDmONS Describe undue hardship or pracucal difficulty or unusu^ property condiuom preventing with Zoning Code re<piiremeno:tf^ />f < i r As. , (attach additional sheets jf necessary AJ6 required submittals V9 ................................- ■. 1.^ Completed Application j50« (you must obtain this list from 3 Plat Map (obuined with surveyor) and include hardcover ‘21^:“^"’ ci> •» •»•«■'■ are proposed. In ^-^^5 (provide one fl) copy 8»A- x IV). ■—you wish notified of It'S applicanon. 9 __Additional items as may be requested by City sttff. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE _____..inn required or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees f^C^time W covered by original fee payme^ Administrator, agrees to pay review of this application, and certifies that the and/or consultant expenses information supplied is true a^rrect to ihp^stjj^ Applicant’s Signature Date Date Owner’s Signature this change prior to the meeting. 8 ;>*•Imm itr•5.#TMPftim&11 «4hii0mm «#•1 R N itMi.iumitN M MR9wRUlNItl ftilf Mt**^RrN *‘OUNTV WWRIWTY INFORHATION SVSTtNWWRIRTY OMCm LISTn si-iit-n ti 0001dOOOO NATHTOMI RORIW«TN niRNNIN ITURCMSTN • RATMRVN 1U00UH44T0 MATIIITaWI MOONAOLf OIAIN m U»f MogRr NO. noMooiOMI to10 ll>110-tt M 0001OOOtl nUNNIlH RO.mUlAH N OHNOll ITUTIHOTNV N • MOM N OTTINAlt TURNNAH RONAUI RUIN IM llSMli li-u4>ti ii MU <•*•00 HOiVtRTOM RV.J L NMttfAO UR RARSTAOjum t MMorooNBIMITON RlMN UMO 10 11-110-tl SIoosos mnouM roC I RNILRO 0 J C RMtlRO CNARilO l/JOOaRIR C RMtLRS MS tURNNAN RO•OSS*M 11-110-tl Ot 0000OOSOO tURNNAH RO0 I R ft R NiRtftouetis t • ftfiMt ft NiRZMO TftRNMiN ROMRU RUM m MMO TUMWiR • p lOfOl ftOltN ftftft ftOOM t CtRTSRY TNAT TM FACTS RIRRMONflO AM AN ACCURMt ANO TOM MRRIOINTAnON OR INRORNAHON AO IT ARRIARS TNIS OATt Oti TM OR TNI NIIONRIN COUNTY 0C0AR1WINT OR RRORIRTY TANATION* TO TNI OR NT RNONLieOI ANO OIUIR OATt' V CO i. f iti.M s.% Ap ■•^_ •*'V s'^»'''-/'Vj* •■-^•*^mm- .V »r ‘ •iyn2:t tf- X \ . f f't.« »1I ^ ■^v (nOi n •■4 V 'lit '*cn^ •.•t E «'» «(Ml i •0/■ m V fl •’ ^aj: •i» ^ r 1 t i M (J i ^ c. ^ 'Oifo^o ^iOS^'3ri / /» (>/^0:y C CJ ,z> A A ti-f ^ i £./ <~ ** C ••A< A /> y O - t A •7^ H^rck £TLiS'r/v^ /JAc t*»Te. c^u le c. af t\»^scL.X f ^<f r“"i t < Tin I M rn*1 » rr• Til I r^T it' r r ri ‘i i *' ■ 1 < > T-^l'----h 1 ' I » l T I Trx.;rT.T!irTri: *. /. / ,',' , *.• rU < 1,1 J ». I I T I f rm_X d.'^c/i^A A«»'f Hci^kT I J.i ’ I i; I 1, ',1 I .',1' • r I 11^*^ ■ ^ * T; 11 r^ I '• 11 \ ^ 'r‘^i^ ^isJ.(kt^L A yyy \^1 ■ T*r* *; i t-*t^^r• j.‘.j.,|, Y/.ip ^. i,^_i ^7^ ^ /^L.i 1,1 1^1 I i‘ii • i' i' I' r I i^r rTi’'r. I i! i;i. i i i'jjv,^ri 1,1,1 j~i I, I, r, r. r, lllii:,i' ri:ir », i », i,' ,*, I, i,.i,i liViiTjV Ilij J..,.L^L,1.^.^1.LY* ‘I I 1*^ I * 1^ t I ^ •' 1^1 ■* I I S f ^ I ^i^T"*** ^ t I I * *1 * i* :=gg=r3^Tnwm 1 T T r .1 <3*2 iKjlJ'Tk >1 IOJo - 20 I 04 I • 43 1042.8 X 4 __ 37.7 .. 0 ·---- I Ar·••·...,. t ---- -- • t --- -Ti/f/g/J/M/vi > I LOCATION INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD I ^k^tcm DATE COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS AIQ ---LL ±±SbJL—l_________LI /m \uriatdf^-------- 1 tf%cUidt ^^ktVS n'iiP (\fet> C CON^OflMlNG S - SUBSTANDARO N NONrONFOMMING II WtN locAlioA 21 Dltiann If om tioiM I# Mptk f•nllt. ditl. bov, mnd tk9inlmk§ 31 North arrow and road —:rssr^ dim. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ttm MittlMIMI M MMliMt IMIUffB. •: SsMtt.t ir*H Mrktr tiMM «rt k«i*« upon an ••timac tfatim. lAlf MrMp tMUMs tp «ko» Up kPHSarlpt pf thp pbp»p «p»crtkp« Ap^ tbp IpcpIIpp pf pp paitii«p ppv^ip tbpfppp. It sppi ■Pi pprpprt tp tbpp ppy ptbpr iPprpwpM^tk pr pPcrpacbMPtL M\ (.KnXHlKi, l\!liiniK ctfitfv i» li»« iit iMir if IttMiMIt =L-=itts= 2s: MM! Orn^m »•«••• flay 27 , 1994 City of Orono We are applying for a variance to build a garage. We would appreciate your consideration in getting this on the Oune 27 meeting agenda as we are doing the contracting ourselves and would like to get the project started as soon as possible in order to get it completed and the yard repaired before winter. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Tmothy W. Otten W\ f i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ 7 1994 DATE: ITEM NO Department Approval: NUM Midud P. Gaffroo Title AsiisiMii Plannii^ A Zoning Adrainistraior Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sccti Zoning Item Description: Annual Commercial Marina Licenses - Lakeside Marina - Gayle ’s Marina List of Exhibits •License -Application -Insurance Certificate -Current Site Plan Cmnplete license applications have now been received from Lakeside Marina and Gayle ’s Marina. Sttff has inspected each site and notes that both are generally adhering to the minimum operation standards required of each licensed marina. V I , I l ' I » -Bdati Staff recommends approval of 1994 Annual C Marina and Lakeside Marina. I mim:-rcial Marina Licenses for Gayle ’s . seconded byPROPOSED MOTION: Moved by ______ Annual Commercial Marina Lice:ises for Gayle ’s Marina and Lakeside Manna Vote: ___ayes,___nays. , to approve 1994 'UN ? 7 1994^PfMONO'1a Section:lU . aU . aU . a'a . aU . aU . aU . a'a . aU . aU . a>m . t'U A.t't A r*. AV^^rr^r*.CITY OF ORONO CFNERAL UCENSK 2514Gayle’s Marina Name of Business:TJXiorqTnF martna tnt Date IssuedPrincipal Owner:James J. Dunn, President3324 North Shore Drive Date Expires 12-31-94 --------------(Issued for period 1-1-94 thru 12-31-94)Address Wayzata, MN 55391 State License No.As a condition of receiving this license, the licensee shall furnish the City with a s -Msfactory surety bond, and liability and propertydamage insurance, when required by the City Code, and shall have complied with all the requirements of the City of Orono, per­ taining to the particular type of activity or business licensed. This license is non-transferable. na and Gavle’s 3 the minimum es for Gavle’s approve 1994 KIND OF LICENSE Comrercial Marina Septic System Installation and/or Pumper Garbage Hauler Residential Kennel Commercial Kennel $ 200.00 Late Fee .t inn.on Total Amount Paid to City $ 300.00 city ORONO CITYofOUOXO P O BOX 66 crystal bay , MINNESOTA bS323 PHONE 473 7357 Signature of City Official White - File Copy Michael P. Gaffron, & Zoning Adnixiistrator .r'-. :*i*;3S8S8S38 Vi-’ ^ r 1-31-941 m ,;'| -5A'/ CITY OF OROpfef ^ ^License Year ?V P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 59323 Phone 473-7357 Date application sent to Marina V Date application returned to Cily ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATIOM > Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - LfecnSfid .Bgqpirfil U is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 15 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION I.BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME I Street Address A/>^__________ 2. Mailing Address (yOAyz-^JZ^ - ^^3?/ MarinaPhone _________Office Phone OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above)_______________ Address ________________________ _____ Phone ___ ___________ /^rry jy mm Viumi OFFICEmssooooo 01 CEM 200. C 200.CTHEDl TL amPT-imHk YOU U297590 cool 001 715 02/a BUSINESS ORGANIZATION; (Check applicable item) ___ individual ownership ____ partnership _ List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: corporation r] i y mm fimCE OFFICEmuooooo 01 iEU-----cm f m Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: / List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: ____ dock attendants ____ repair or service personnel ^ others available for sales/public information, etc. Page 1 of S ^.C YOU V^/ > ' • i/iV^ Lia every shon or long lenn business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: _______[1^^^*r G f PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): ^<imr gcp<ai»^ in-water slip rental y^»lloy rental dry sprage ^winter in and out service /S boat launching (day-use ramp) boat rental boat clubs repair parts and service fuel sales ^ bait and tackle sales y\ boat and trailer sales y boat holding tank pumpout ^^charter boat port-of-call z' other (list)_____________ 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): ____ open all year ----- List proposed hours of operation: dock access reuil sales Sl service open during boating season only PM PM MARIN A SECURITY is provided by: __ CARETAKER living on site? IJCI i K 1 SI.IFS AND BOAT t List the maximum number of boats in each categoiy. Each slip, mooting or o^ space Ktu^ used for storage or keepiiw of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this appiication.^ R„,a,siipu Od« T<«1 Owned Boau S|»cei Boats 7.BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) ---- ---- ~~ ZH JL2.At dock s’ ps Total Boats in Water 8 BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a.Inside Buildings b.Outside on Racks c.Outside - other means Toul Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) Page 2 of 5 10.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.New boats for sale (inventory) c.Used boats for sale (inventory) d.Other (list:_________________) Total 11 .OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.Contract storage (customer’s boats) c.Inventory (new & used boats) d.Other (list:_________________) Total Inside Buildina Outside Building Inside Building Outside Building Total OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENIS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) b.Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use (.6 x __(line 9)) = c.Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp - spaces spaces TOTAL SPACES pa^s 13.WINTER PARKING a.(.2 X__(add lines I2a and 12b)l nnCK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHEpK ALL THAT APPLY: ^ Pennanem ____ Seasonal Wood ____ Concrete Wood ____Metal Foam spaces Pilings: Decking ____ Oe-icu^ normally used ^ Metal ____ Other____ Floution Method (if used) Other_ Barrels Other LICENSE STAMHARDS ADVISORY Butinfffe* required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license standards: ^[pqirancg Required. Each business shall provide cenification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B 1-icenseholder. Page 3 of 5 c. licenseholder. and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in cnnfonnance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishii^ activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) 5) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. Parking and on-Iand storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipmem shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the aomial license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7)Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacem properties. Business Use I icenses Limited to B-2 Zone. .Mo business use shall be licensed in any zo^ district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. liirtiiniN Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. Page 4 of 5 ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all stnictures. storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, aU changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3.Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPUCATION. 4.COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. -3frInitial Application @ $300.00 ______ Renewal Application ® $200.00 ____ Late Fee (if not postmarked by February 15) $100.00 TOTAL DUE THIS APPUCATION S HF.VIFW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City CouncU wiU review ihe license applicaiion and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THF MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USF ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE UCE^SE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuam to Section 5 .43 of the Orono Municipai Code, the applicant hereby requests die Ot^ CiW council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono ^ the City’s designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina properw at any rcaso^te^ emfiaaf And cod« comoliaoce insnections. Relationship to Owner Page 5 of 5 dElimCAtC OF IN9URANGB ' rwWa^ 4 kk^a »mMi% ■mmh «w««oivn AMERICAN AGENCY INC. P 0 BOX 1(527 5881 CEDAR LAKE RC BT LOUIS PK ggwiy.81^VFONTNicmmeATi noLom imcSSmSi'n OOMPAMU APPORDINO GOVIRAOE LAKESIDE MARINA PROPERTIES 3324 N SHORE DR WAYZATA MN S5391 s??^»r A HAUGEN MARINE INS s?wr ■HARTFORD INS. f»«r c »K< ]CO^Q SSnST R HAUGEN MARINS INS VS9^ oSuSSS SS rnffloM w «Syi!ouSirulSfi«^•*•*>' ™ *a ™. nwK. ’VKmsrxmsagT mm 07/i«/»3 oVi</»4>AC^7060098 cgiiiiiMBt X OMua n • AM;• A Atv. lUMV I ^6o,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 . 50,000 ■st/ii/ii is/bi/n ZZI2**"”* »!;ggj- umt a IMMM • MtWWMAUW tCATVfONViMn MARINA OPERATORS 07/16/S3 6^/ii/U t » LI300,000/ BI / PD / MARINA CITY OF ORONO ATTN MICHAEL GAFFRON ORONO MN iO AOUOn M CANOI NN AT^ AAn THt UlUW OOMPANV Mi UFT, Mir won TO TOTM NO OMJMTWN on TK coMytv. ffo^^tonn 00 imm Minnetonka Charier Cruisesfeatures a 50-foot Gibson, theWhy Knot III, equipped withfull kitchen, rest facilities,stereo cassette player, airconditioning, ship to shorecommunications. mtd mmji mMt ^# # # Company Parties Informal Meetings/Seminars Business Entertaining Special Events/Weddings Anniversaries/Birthdays Family Reunions Neighborhood Gatherings 'c-t ' V Take a historic tourof beautiful LakeMinnetonka, relax inthe sun and enjoyyour favorite food and drink. . . whatever your wishes, our licensed captain and uniformed crew are at your command. mi 1 A I . -. - * f -4 ► 1 Fore and aft decks plus two spacious upper decks provide comfortable outdoor seating. The spacious interior provides comfortable accommodations for those who prefer indoor seating. m Full menu and beverage service availableOAA KM-y ZcAKMUceUUf ^UcmUM:-rr y < w V f :\ /I ' M m MlNNl lONK \ C IIAKll R C Rl lSl S. INC.7ffetea40t€4 tfm y4tMftd tit >ur standard cruise, three ours, is economically priced /ith additional hours available t equally attractive prices. For reservations or additional information ccUl 944-5642 M wUCc Minnetonka Charter Cruises P.O. Box 44154 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 vll cruises include crew, ice, lasses, and utensils. •• •• . ri fr( frmf you WHY KNOT III 944-5642 f1l ' •. I . , .: ' � I• I • • , I ' . -: N . I' 00: 'I, • l .I �/ 1r '. z: f, N G'": 0 :--" : 0 -J � ,_j)I 0 0-. � I \ r, ·; 1 ' . '•! ,,.. I 10.00 '.. / :., 0 C. 1/1 �..., ....... � • • • • t • • 't ' ' •:, I \ . 1 ...... -. ·- .., .. , -�./7 --..J 0 -� 61, �Oo,:· . .-_· .. I.�-cJ • , ,"'-1. �.' , ' / V 1,: • • Q'eJ:-./J r [I -iJ ..... 'C /·.'l •,, 11 ,1�,,,,,. (l,J . • I ,JV1q1 ..Q5 .s - ;, 0 C. II' � � -' > ,......-... "·-,C's) ,. ti! �f• . '"t-I 6 <' � � 0·01;, -. ,, , I / -/ 0 V' I , ./ I i I I (./) I / 0 I ,, ... _ (./) X) 0 / 0 ,. 0 " I , ·u ( ' I ,, J� .. o· 'f . ·' .!_J (P .· I ; II \ , ,' ,I -�1.. ,r- • '.; I �" \Y \,J \•J V I \ \i I� .J \ .J) I ' u °"'.l:• ::, fT1 r I I I W/ -< � / I I • V\ I .. I -t. . ' ' I ( I ••• · .. .. ' .. . ' :I • : • • ! ' .• ' : ,, ' .: '' • ' . . .. ·,•I • ' ' ;f .l IS . 0 0 \ N -0 .0 I'+·- r ' z:. � .. 0 .., . \ ...... I ::;r l . ..l if\ .o -cr .•. I :-:.\ :. ,. .. : ..... . . . ... \ . r z: � 0 , .....:;rt \ .D- .. - "' . t t I • t� --.J � � .... f > \,1 � n.. 1.1' I¼ [ t., (' ....cV1 � �� - Vl 'D J' � ! --.9 .. t-r, f :t ();) .. f � ..JI 1 � ' I � N . N �, N·. 0 0 0c: - IC) -fll • . I -. rn \ .\ N -.p I I. : . I OJ-. , C: :! -.- c:; Ill l .. (JJ _J;:) f ' CJ >-� ' f l . . . • "' v� . . •.� r� 7...... J•� I " Ol 7, fl , .r·,, .., ► '" • '• •• L ..... - / / . . \ , .• ' ( / ( , ' . .. . . .. .. .. . - o·b // \ ' . ' 0 •• . . ... .... a �. '--=-: l.l_ =>- "'. ' .•/ CP , • / LO / -< .. ,' -·--· (. ")-..,-· ,, I . I . • : I.• / -·-"'{ -----:, . . . I 0 I 0 -. V" �o -- \ ( . ( I Principal Owner: Gayle Wittio. President: 3366 North Shore Drive_ _ _ _ Wayzata, MN 55391 93S3S388S3S3S3S383S3S3S393S3S3S3S3S3S3S3»S3S3^CITY OK OHONO GKNKHAL LICENSE NV _ 2516GAYTJE'S MARINA CORPORATTON Date Issued Date Expires __________ (Issued for period 1-1-94 thru 12-31-94) State License No._________________ As a condition f receiving this license, the licensee shall furnish the City with a satisfactory surety bond, and liability and property damage insurance, when required by the City Code, and shall have complied wim all the requirements of the City of Orono, per ­ taining to the particular type of activity or business licensed. This license is non-transferable. KIND OF LICENSE Comnercial Marina Septic System Installation and/or Pumper Garbage Hauler Residential Kennel Commercial Kennel 200.00 $_ Late Fee Total Amount Paid to City S 1nn nn s 3nnnn ClTYofOROXO P o BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA 55323 PHONE 473 7357 Signature of City Official White - File Copy Micltael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Yellow — Licensee mmammmmmmmmmsmmmBmaisamm . ••• § ii- - L„ cm Date application sent to Marina __ JUM 15 19*’^ License Year P.O. Box <i6» C17 Pb medtoCigL I •r:; I: . j ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND UCENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 15 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1 Gayle's Marina CorporationBUSINESS OR TRADE NAME___________________________________ 3366 North Shore Drive — Wayzata* MN 55391Street Address -em-dF oiiQNO Mailing Address________ MarinaPhone 471-9495 Office Phone FINAHCE OFFICE UtlSOOOOd 2.OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above) Address __________________ Phone 01 QEH JOO.i CHECK R JOO. i HtCEiPf-THm YCiU ^306470 cool ROl 71. 06/1: 3.BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) individual ownership partnership corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: Gayle Wittig - President i Marilyn Wittig - Sec. Tres Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: 2-4___ dock attendants____ o*l^se1^ce personnel Varies day (J^fl^^vailable for sales/public information, etc. Page 1 of 5 . 4 li I r ‘ ►•' List every short or long terra business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: None 4.PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check aU services offered): in-water slip rental buoy rental dry s^rage ____ winter in and out service X It boat launching (day-use ramp) boat rental boat holding tank pumpout boat clubs repair parts and service fuel sales bait and tackle sales boat and trailer sales charter boat port-of-call other (list)_________ 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): ____ open during boating season onlyopen all year dock access AM to PM retail sales & service ^ AM to 10 PM open 24 hours. MARINA SECURITY is provided by: CARETAKER living on site? _____ Gayle’s Marina Corp. *! —f ICIIKSLIPS AND BOATl List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and si>e plan submitted wiU. Chis application.sup« oa.« Total Owned Boats Spaces Boats BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) a.At dock slips Total Boats in Water 7. 143 when fuV 8.BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE Inside Buildings ____ Outside on Racks ____ Outside - other means ____ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use ____ a. b. c. 9.TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) 143 Page 2 of 5 r If 10.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.New boats for sale (inventory) C.Used boats for sale (inventory) d.Other (list:) Total Inside Building Outside Building VARIES - day by de NONE NOIfE -HOItE None Total 11.OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) Transient boats (repair/service) Contract storage (customer’s boats) Inventory (new Sl used boats) Other (list:_________________) Total a. b. c. d. Inside Buildine Outside Building none varies -------VARTES -40 - 100 -------—VARIES Total Afg.sntKET PARKING REOtllREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum ( + 1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) b.Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use (.6 x__(line 9)] = c.Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = spaces spaces spaces TOTAL SPACES YOU HAVE ON FILE. 13.WINTER PARKING a, (.2 X (add lines 12a and 12b)]spaces >CK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: ^ Permanent ____Seasonal XPilings: Decking: Wood Wood Concrete ^ Metal ___ De-icing normally used Metal Other____ Other Flotation Method (if used):Foam Barrels (Dther y.ICENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the foUowing business use license standards: fpjyurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liability insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. B y icenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the Page 3 of 5 ‘ I H 1 ? •^ !l Ikcnscholdcr. and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secoiKlary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only wten in conformance with the provisions of the B>2 zonii^ district standards. C.Operation Standards Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging snail be iunited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4)The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage On land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment stall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan stall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7)Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Business Use Licenses T imited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district stall not be required to obtain a license. T icense Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards stall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. Page 4 of 5 •• ATTACli •sLiaJCils' The following must accompany this application: 1.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, ail changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indkalc the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. j. 4. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL MARINA UCENSE APPUCATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application ® $300.00 Renewal Application @ $200.00 $?or.twr Late Fee (if not postmarked by February 15) $100.00 300.00 TOTAL DUE THIS APPUCATION REVIEW PROCEDURE . .. .. -.4 When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license applicauon and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON .APPROVAL OF THE LICKlSfe RY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City ’s designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code^^pliance inspections. Authorized Sigiyiture Date---- Tide i Relationship to Owner Page 5 of 5 !•» /r. JUN 14 '94 10:17flM, PMERICflN PGENC.YN •Ml [MMTorn06 AKERICAN AOSNCY INC. P 0 BOX 16527 5851 CEDAR LAKE REsTwoifPK MS 5541«-8SJ7 g-« , icnicH jwsRiCJW m;. ,••••••••*•«••••••'••••••«*«»•♦•»••••••■ .......M.....•*•••••••••••• oayles marina corf 3366 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA MN 55391 sgffflr* ,•4»4«•••••• gssrc SRT 0 ss?«ri ••• • •••••• • •• •••• • •••• ••••••••' •• • ««««^»« • «*••• ••4« . ^. t •. tmfMkt uAr K *w» «mm oM. •••«••»♦«i•••••••%#•«•••••*••••••• •500^000 •500,000 I 500,000 •" 500,000 mmrnt t 500,000 ........................................................... ............................................................”• *‘ • i *'•r,* • . i moouj ANY OF THS AlOVI OHOIIIO WUCII •■ CANMUIO IIPOM TW tXWUTION OATI TNIMOF. TW IMWNa JOMFAWy MU ENOfAVOI TO CITY OP ORONO =•': jyuut J0_oayi wmttin Nonci to tmi owifiomi HOiaw namio totmi LIFT. lUT FARJUra TO MAN. MOM NOTWi IMUJL IMFOM NO OHJOAT10N 01ATTN: MICHAEL GAFFRON FAX #473-0510 u UAIAJTV OF ANT KMO UFON THi COMFANY. fTI AOINTF ON MFIltlMTAHVia. rAfwa ./» ^• i; RICHARD SCHELDROUP ( ^ '■'•"■• RACOWD 06R»OlW>#-1H4 ......■ Lr^n,.A.-k1 ■_______Atn-ijr .M 1___2______A.______c____S.jL* •'"-"-***7 ............-X,. . ' i i . . ' II I \ . \ . \ ·FJ i-0 l?­ i O r z • 0• , I (JJ- .I. ' .---. r,C.... -:> - ' • ,. •iQ -- \ ., ,- O · .. � I <.r . I • I ! " ie]I' .a ._ I '" I • ', ) .. ' ' . _ .... . . . -- .. II I I : I I t.I . . •I I' ' I I I I I ' t r. N -, . . .- -·- J::: z= �::. I ' •I . • • I ' I 1 ..•• I : t •I . I I·. .. . I I ,, 'I . : .' I . • ! t I ... . t,, ! •I • 'I 1 . , ... ... . ' .r ' \ ... ,. :I·.. .. .. . . " .. iL . . 'I • . ' . I I. 'i '.. '•• ·.' ' t•I• •. .• .. l. , . i I . I j. • • . ' I •I I I I I '. I . I' I far 'j;'^■■ ■nn j request for council action ©Ty a DATE: June 22. ITEM NO: /Q Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hall in Tkle City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Change Precinct Polling Location for Precinct #4 The City has used the Orono School District facilities as a polling location for many years. N(W that the new city facilities U located in the boundaries of Precinct 4 it is reasonable to use the Council Chambers as a polling location. sure law tequites that a change in polling place location be accomplished prior to August 12th of this year. This wUI provide enough lime for postal notification to all registered voters m the precinct to be notified of the chaise in location. A proposed resolution outlining the change ,i polling location is attached for Council action. As you will recall the polling location for Precinct 1 was changed in April 1993 from the former Council Chambers in Crystal Bay to the Minnetonka Center for the Arts. COUNCIL ACTION REQLT:STED: Motion to approve proposed resolution. . '»»r' t -i_______■!.^.r, .. s- __J Till I ' ■■*■■■■»«—I I ■!■--C"nr7ii»^ *-»TT,TT.«rlinTfTTTTj ■ T- CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE Cm' COUNCIL NO..______________ A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A NEW PRECINCT #4 Pf> CLING LOCATION WHEREAS, the City of Orono has constmeted a new city facilities campus on Kelley Parkway; and WHEREAS the Citv of Orono has used the Orono School District facilities for a m.n.ber of tf Uk number of »l«,ua« space avaUable w.Uun boundaries of Precinct ^4, and WHEREAS the new city facilities constructed on Kelley Parkway are within the boundaries of ade^a^ faciUues for bod, d» voter and d» elecnon judges. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the P^inct #4 ^llii« locatiOT be changed from the Orono School District facilities to the Orono CouncU Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway, in the City of Orono. Adopted by the City CouncU of the City of Orono. Minnesou at a regular meeting held June 27, 1994. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk r*! :> .’-JS2WCT REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE:June lAT ^ ITEM NO: / /^4/jlf Department Approval: Name Tom Kuebn '“"TyK^ xtor-' Administrator Reviewed: Title Finance Direct Agenda Section: City Administrators Report Item D^cription: Request to Delete Sewer Assessment on Tax Forfeit Lot Released for Sale to Adjacent Property Owner Attachments:Letter from N. Hammarberg Discussion; In March, 1985 the parcel identified as PIN 06-117-23 41 0058 was lax forfeit due to nonpayment of the sewer assessment levied in 1975, for collection from 1976 through 1990. The parcel in question and an adjoining parcel were each charged with a one half unit for the sewer assessment because neither was considered buildable individually. The other parcel was combined with another lot so the remaining tax forfeit parcel was released only for sale to an adjoining property. Mr. Niklas Hammarberg, the owner of 4081 Oak Street, which adjoins the forfeit parcel would like to purchase the forfeit lot and has requested that the City waive the sewer assessment, originally $2,881.12, now $3,273.98 with penalties and interest. In as much as the lot is non-buildable and will not have sewer p«-ovided to it, and because the bonds for this project were paid off in 1990, it is staffs recommendation that if Mr. Hammarberg purchases the tax forfeit lot and combines it with his existing property, then the delinquent sewer assessment outstanding under levy 6345 be waived. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Waiver of outstanding delinquent sewer assessment on tax forfeit PID 06-117-23 41 0058 in the amount of $3,273.98 upon purchase by N. Hammarberg, if parcel is combined with Hammarberg property located at 4081 Oak Street. Proposed Motion: Moved by _, seconded by _, to waive the outstanding sewer assessment on the lax forfeit property PID 06-117-23 41 0058 upon the purchase by adjoining property owner, N. Hammarberg, 4081 Oak Street and combination with the adjoining property. Ayes , Navs A' nrv»i#^i—nxuTr"Tiin . rm*..ir*i -i*« 1 5 JOQ4 13.1994 -> V ):.i 1; City Couadl of OfOQO F.O. Box 66 CiyAalBav.MN SS323 I I .V Moobcn of Ike Oraoo City Cooocil. 1 would like to purchase lot #10. pared 3600, PID 06-117-23«414X)58. atyaceni 10 lots #11 and #12 which 1 currently own. The parcel wae ideaaed for sale by the CHy Council on March 11.1985. Resolution No 1736. 1 am willinf to pay S500.00. the price <|uoled to me by the Hennepin County Department of Property Tax and Public Records. However. 1 would like to petition that the sewer asscsmentofS3.273.98.be waived. The lot is not buildable. has not been generatiag any taxes for the city, and has been accruing sewer 1973 The lot in question is currently lying idle and is being used as a catch-all for trash and discarded lawn clippingsforanches by a few of the surrounding property owners. I propose to combine this parcel with my adjacem lots #11 and #12. thereby adhereing to the resolution requiring adjacency, for the purpose of buildinf a garage. This particular parcel has not been generating tax revenue sincel987, and my purchase of this property would make the lot productive both in mrms of my needs, and in terms of generating tax revenue for the city of Orono. Thank you in advance for r*-ring this petition. Sincerely. Niklas Hanunarberg 4081 Oak Street Oiono. MN 55356 (612)473-3716 -• / i * U. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATEJime 2 ITEM NO: %s, Department Ap|Kt>val: Name Tom Kuehn —• AdmmBtralor Reviewed: Title Finance Director * Agenda Section: City Adminbtrators Report Item Description: Charlotte Knutson Rctiiemcnt - Resolution of Appreciation and Declaring July 8. 1994 as Charlotte Knutson Day Charlotte Knutson, Deputy Treasurer/Senior Accounting Clerk will be retiring effective July 8. 1994, after more, than 20 years of service to the City of Orono. A resolution of appreciation and declaration of Charlotte Knutson Day will be provided to Council at the June 27 Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to Charlotte Knutson and Declaring July 8, 1994 as Charlotte Knutson Day. 4 1 i r I 1. t/ •*» { ^ i' ' » % tp t< I. •V rt: f" r ^ 1 -; CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE Cm COUNCIL NO. A resolution in APPRECUTION to charlotte KNUTSON declaring JULY 8, 1994 AS CHARLOTTE KNUTSON DAY WHEREAS Charlotte Knutson has served the City of Orono wiih loyalty and 4 •fa trtfai of twenty years four months within the Finance Department, includmg the accounting clerk, a.^ deputy neasurer; «rving as the deputy Ireasurer from December 15. 1986 to the pteseni; and yVHEREAS. Charlotte Knutson s performance of her duto and res^nsibUtties was always characterized by a professional attitude and a dedicauon to her ,ob. and ♦ ♦ City. WHEREAS. Charlotte Knutson has decided to retire from her position with the NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the Ci^ does wish her a long, happy, and fulfilling retirement; and further be it resolved , that July 8,1994 is declared Charlotte Knutson Day in honor of her many years of dedicated service. .Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. sMinnesota at a regular meeting held June 27, 1994. Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin. City Clerk a «■A .i .iWUUA —B<lTO.48eL.illklUMHrtlllil*a- 4 'i! 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 27. 1994 ITEM NO: DcpartiBent Approval: NaMc Dorothy Hailin Tkl* City aerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectkm: '<ty Admiaistrators K noti Item Dcscriptkm: Resignation of City Recorder Attachment: Resignation of Barbara Anderson Dated June 27, 1994 Attached b the resignation of City Recorder Barbara Anderson effective June 30, 1994 Barbara has been City Recorder since November 1993 and has performed in a very professional manner and will be missed by city suff. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to accept the resignation of Barbara Anderson and direct staff to initiate the hiring process for a replacement. Ayes_, Nays_. ~ ‘•i -miimimi*- m I Hill An . C.W • June 27. 1994 Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crysul Bay. MN 55323 RE: Resignation of Position as City Recorder Dear Dorothy, 1 wish to inform ytiu that 1 am resigning as City Recorder for the City of Orono effective June 30, 1994. I have accepted a position which re<)uircs that I work six and a half hours a day. which is almost full time, and my family and I feel that to continue as City Recorder for Orono would be unfair to everyone concerned. I would like to say that I have very much enjoyed working for you and for Orono and it is with regret that I resign this position. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to make new friends and share new experiences. Sincerely, Barbara B. Anderson cc: Ron Moorsc, City Administrator •* REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE* Jure 23. 1994 ITEM NO.: 13 Departmciit Approval: Naac Joha R. Geibardsoo Title Public Works Direaor Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectii Public Works Item DcscriptioB: Relocation Monuments Prior to the demolition of the old Council Chambers on Brown Road South in the Crysul Bay area, we removed two monuments that had been placed several years ago. One monument was moved to the new facility site and is adjacent to the entrance to the new Council Chambers. The two monuments that need to be relocated is the large one that lists the World War I Vets and the one with Dr. Wm. Newhall’s name on a smaller stone. Staff is requesting Council direction on location and placement of the monuments < COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; •, • Newsletter #92 April. 1991 Pa^e 10 A Bit of Orono History by Marie Gorman Orono bccotues a Village. As a village. Orono has a MayOT and four Trustees. The other Officials rem^n the same. In 1962 some Officials axe appointed instead of elected. An Attorney and an Engm^r have been add^ The Consubk is leplaced^by the Chief of Police and the Assessor is also the Building Inspector. In that Inspector is a separate Official and a Planning Commissioner shows up. In 1967 a Park Commissioner has been added. In 1968 the Trustees ate called Council Members. In 1973 ^h^^s^uf^’ City. In 1980-1981 a City Planner is listed. It is imf^ssiblc to list the names of all who have held these offices in our newsletter, but those names that ine known are Ustea in the Orono Centennial Book. The Orono Books are soil available at the Pioneer Museum. There arc three monuments at the Old Town Hall The first one honors those from the area who served our nation in the First World War and their names arc listed. It w^ erected by the Women s Club in 1917-1918. The second one honors Dr. Newhall for his dedicated work and help to this community. This was put up in 1937. The third monument commemorates the 100th year of Orono. It was erected as part of the Centeruiial Celebration. Constructed prior to electricity and running water and first heated by logs in a ^^belUed stove, the Orono Town Hall is from another era. Oheve was still no runmng water m Je building the last council meeting was held in Occember 1992; you had to get the key tor the building next dwrj It has outlived its time as a councU chamber but stiU retains us quaint charm and historical signiticancc. (Information and pictures for the Old Orono Town Hall articles courtesy of \^0>A archives. (>ono Centennial Book, South Dakota State Historical Society. Marge Gasch, Bill Stubbs. Steven Kelley and Bob Gasch. 'ork Continues on Raffle Quilt Raffle tickets arc now available for the WHCPA 1993 Raffle Quilt. The p^tem this year is called "Double 9-Patch", chaiming traditional quilt in navy blue a^ muted reds. The quilt top put together in Februarv at an all-day Piecing Bee' and the hand-quilting contmucs at the .Museum. The quilt is scheduled to be raffled-off at the WHCPA Annual Meeting in August. It you would like to help, or want ticket information, please call Cinda Dumas at 476-2256. zx rr^Bt» xt xt XX XV " t , XX XX XX XX a XX XXtx XX XX XSfc. XX XX XX XX XXVX ^ V - XX 4 REQUEST FOR COi ’NCIL ACTION ^7 DATE: ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name Dorothy Hallin Title City Ckrk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: Licenses for Council Approval Special Event Permit Long La*cc Chamber of Commerce Circus at Orono Schools (Middle School) softball fields July 27, 1994 from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. Septic System Installers Coppin Plumbing Mound, MN Clover Hill Co, Inc. Shakopee, MN Duane Ritter Exc. Rockford, MN COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve licenses listed above. aaniiil. p Date:June 16, 1994 To:Ron Hoorse, City Adninistrator Fron:Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police Subject:Special Event Permit I have reviewed the application of the Long Lake Chamber of Commerce in which they propose to have King Brothers Royal Circus perform on the Orono Schools grounds on July 27, 1994. I have no objection to the issuance of this permit. .ag,-- --t- - - -,.■A to ...■«AAA>rl> i ♦ ■i iPerrait #: Fee: $50.0QI PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA Phone Number: ' 7^ S 7_ Address: Jl/ City, State, Zip:A' -f At /t/ ^Location of Parade or Event; - -f ^ 5cL Person(s) and/or Organitation(s) Handling the Event:---- ^^---------------------------------------------------------------------------------—------------------—------------ Date of E-/ent: r-l-f -t7 /f?y_ Hours of Event ; S^js.J 2A Reason or Purpose: Copy^of^insurance*certificates to be suDnitted with this application. Amount: T aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and‘will abide by same. I ^^^i®^irectly orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirecuiy °rora the parade or special event approved by the granting of this permit. ^} ature Date Approved:Denied:3v: Remarks: rrrv rr LlJt if Lnwitw FI^A^CS OFFICE ;j10400000 >i rciJ /a WWI« riiCi'X 71 ■wv 0 V ;}0O£-!00 cool flOl TO 1 1 ^ /I - VU»/ Aw rr:'—r V iHT¥o (612)473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay# MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION , ^ ,_License fee# bond» certificate of All questions MPCA Certification must be attached, >^A11 insurance, ”^'^.(£5, lay approval oeriod.applications are subject to a ten a«iy 1. 2. 3. 4. Business or trade name r.oPMcO P\UV^6.H fc------ Business address 'S.^OD (pUrtygacv \-<i----------^ Business phone Residence phone _2^2T^ /VlKSS3fc'-l Name o£ applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification VfJ uurry->cC ---------------------------------------- 5.Type of certification held; Certificate expiration date Occ 3 \ . \ H m y ?\imoerr rrv »"rorfvn ............................ * “UlfWc*a I t rr;/Aairr nccrrc t aitr*fVi.Ci wi * awi* 6.“‘o7o Mos%*\'e^ce//rear r A A.'iw*V • W 7.Have you ever had a license revoked? Qjg Where? _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—- - - - When? A i )*rvV a vwiT rixr'r Tt rA M .... ..*. w : . Ti-f # «. f yi ttli«i.w-^ai 1 f I i/ittA f i/w rAAf >*Vf TAT;-•tw'VT w* I V ww'a »%va » v'» •«* VW/ W I / 8. 9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes No Do you pump cut septio tanks? Yes SUBMITTALS REQUIREDs ,/i. $50.00 License application fee. ^ ^ r\ n 1 «* e* a a mea r*m *L t" bOT- 2 $2000.00 license and permxt bond naming Cit/ o ■!: iiii!ss:3o5^?or^ini^;rc*e^ii?rcft:^o^ ?tiuSanis:g:w 4^Cooy of cuirzenti MPCA CeiTwificat6* LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARB SUBMITTED The undersigned hereby makes application to °fystemSf Minnesota, for a license to install and repair state of and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the St Minnesota ^md the Ordinances of the City of Orono.Minnesota clo.^ v.ai« —----— Date -q<-l . Applicant's Signature (ACuAlyut/Ju^ C CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval, Reason for denial; City Council Action Date Date license mailed __ _ _ Approved Denied —3:-. 1 "" “t^Yof ORONO (612)473-7357 Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bayr MN 55323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE application AIL questions Bust be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA certification must be attached. .^All aSolilations are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1.Business or trade name ^*I'^-------- -. ,, /2,rs/ D SLu k(i,oc,c2.Business address C>^ ^ —------------------^--------------- 5. 8. Business phone ~72 3 ^7/^^ ^ Residence phone _tLdlZJ2L2^ Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA X Installer ____ (W ms- Piimoer certification Type of certification held: Certificate expiration date Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year — Have you ever had a license revoked? —— When? - - - - -- Where? ___________________________—----------------------------------------“ Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-vps? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes . rrrv r>c rron«Aiwa f I u'MbrtTu LrhiAiurL nccrrcI aimftu'i. wi I auu Copy of current MPCA Certificate. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITOIS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license liio/c Li'V\eAC^.---------------------------------------- The undersigned hereby makes application to the City Minnesota, for a license to install and repair seP^ic q£ and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State or Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. Date V~ /2. - f •/Applicant's /2^ CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval Reason for denial: Denial Date Cit: Council Action Date Date license mailed _ _ _ Approved.Denied LLERS mo •crrc I t*U'■vv r/-i ^vvv V vrrfit\ »ww VI I * vw/ i V/ CITY of septic system INSTAIXERS LICENSE APPLICATION (612)473-7357 Post Office Box crystal Bay, MN ->license fee, bond, certificate of . All Questions must be Certification must be attached. All insur'ance, and evidence of^approval pertod. applications are sub]ec ___ y4^ 1 r Business or trade name^ -y^/ ■y Q Business address —^^ ■Business address . ^ -- - - - - 3u=ines. ...e of ‘-:!i ce T-nse Of c:ertification^held^ -/^ Certi. - cate expiration date _ / Pxinper Hav» vou ever held aHav> ^ Most recent yea- tialL^r license Orono before? v.3,^ a license revoked?Have you ever had a x-cense ___^ Where?_____________—-------------- 30 you do Municipal Sewer T.oon-ups? fes . 30 you puiap ouc septic tanks? Yes ___ When?*r "crfhri.ail wi w*Mw*iti/ \:rr *ccTpc I t- Cl I 1 wc •• - 1 •4 A A A1311500000 —V 1 rUCrk; 71 wKCUii^ No ^I i ?w* V • Vr.% r V -rrrroT.7L.A;;;* vri/j f •rl»rTMl% 1 VU * V > 4. r* ? f “»f > J r J -yrJvvC'aV * ^2 06/1. SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: A.S50.00 License naming City of Orono —^n S2000.00 license and permit ° w-f ’ 1 net be accepted.ro^licee. cne State Plumpers rona wr i ,iso-ioc-soo.ooo siinitnum Cer.--C-t- c r CODV of current MPCA Cartrircate. " .XC^S.S WXLL .or B. PBOCBSSHO 0»XXL ALL X.BHB ABB SOBMX r.iet oersons other than applioa^------- for permits under your license r ^ZT/TIT^ono. The undersigned hereby V„d° reoair e«P'=i'= %\XTle Minnesota, for a license to xn^-all of the State o Minnesota^ and t.he Ordinances of the sT/ ^ ~ /Applicant's SignatureDate CITY USE ONLY City Council PiCtLan Date license mailed Date Approved Date Denied r •1-1 ... ��� .. �-� . A-,.'"A • • : -·�' . . . � �'tJllsHO� 93 154S .30 299.45 31 6398.00 551.46 42 16025.33 1113 .06 93 16616.33 1278.96 31 26994.17 2177.20 3 1 20907 60 1620.89 31 21130.70 1620.39 31 21177.14 1611.52 33 16919.23 1304.16 12 14698.23 1140.31 33 15355.70 1186.48 64,510.77 11 2100.00 300.00 11 1691.69 241.67 11 1691.69 241.67 11 1691.69 241.67 11 1691.69 241.67 1.266.63 DESCRIPTIOIJw/H transferredCORR W/H TRANS ENTRY ACCOUNT 99999-20309999-2030 INVOICE•••m ^ m m ^OOlOOiOOlOOft PO NUM.MANUAL'"IpIPW/n FIT,FlCA, MEDCR 9999-2030 Q0099S IPCITY SHARE FICA/MEDC 9999-2032 00099S IPNET P/R TRSFR 9999-2030 Q00994 IPDBF COMP M/H 9999-2030 001000 IP iDEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 000999 IPSTATE TAX W/H 9999-2030 000997DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 001001 IP DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 001002 IP PERA W/H 9999-2030 000998 fp CHARITY W/H 9999-2030 001006 IP 1 DEF COMP W/H 9999-2030 001003 IP 1 OR 030M2 008 ALL STEEL PRODUCTSOR 030943 027 APPLE VALLEY AGENCY OR 030944 1018 ASCOM MAILING SYSTEM OR 03094S 037 AUGIBS MOBILE CHEF OR 03094C T069 BLACKOHIAK 6 SON OR 030947 T070 BLACKOWIAK 6 SON OR 030940 085 BUDGET PRINTING OR 030949 T552 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE O. OR 030950 T274 CHUNKS GARAGE OK 030951 1021 CITY OF LONG LAKE OR 030952 T532 COMMERCIAL ASPHAL COMPAK OR 030953 143 COMMERCIAL LIFE/GRP OR 030954 152 CUMMINS ALLISON OR 030955 154 CYS UNIFORMS OR 030956 T549 D.M.J. CORPORATION OR 030957 157 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW OR 030958 741 DEMBOUSKI/JAY OR 030959 T537 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 150.00 OH 48.13 MW OH 154.45 MW OH 543.92 MW OH 34.05 MW OU 191.25 MW OH 596.40 MW OH 25.00 MW OH 20.00 MW OH 22.80 MW OH 208.81 MW OH 66.20 MW OH 25.05 MW Oil 50.00 MW OH 610.00 MW OH 16.83 MW OH 190.76 MW OH 74.64 MW OH 1,515.87 MW OH 1,504.00 MW OH mcm or ORONO 06/23/94THO; JOH 23,1994.10:34 PM---req: CHRIS OPENloc: OR-FINCF-II n L D A /P-jf'b: 40AR HJ720 CHECK REGISTER-----proq: CK200 cl.07>riig« sreport idt CKREC---Check Payee ID.Payee Name Dat Clieck Amount Type SubsOK 030f83 477 MIDWEST BSNS PROD 04/27/94 518.14 MW OHOK030f03T545MILLER, aiRIS 06/27/94 43.04 MW OilOK030984sooMINN COMM 06/27/94 78.8?MW OHOK030985490MINNEGASCO04/27/94 160.22 MW OH OK 030984 1049 MINNESOTA BENEFIT 06/27/94 24.98 MW OH OK 030987 1042 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE 06/27/94 865.00 MW OH OR 030988 549 MINNETONKA 06/27/94 7,754.25 MW OH OK 030989 522 MTI DIST CO 06/27/94 382.90 MW OH OR 030990 T389 NATL RIFLE ASSOC 06/27/94 15.00 MW OH OR 030991 542 NSP 06/27/94 303.38 MW OH OR 030992 545 O'SULLIVANS NAVARRE AUTO REPAI 06/27/94 17.20 MW OH OR 030993 574 0PM INFORMATION SYSTEMS 06/27/94 .89.00 MW OH OR 030994 415 PERRYS VENTURES INC 06/27/94 56.57 MW OH OR 030995 416 PIONEER 06/27/94 53.90 MW OH OR 030994 435 PRECISION TURF 06/27/94 1,721.57 MW OH OR 030997 1124 PRO TIRE & EXHAUST 06/27/94 39.06 MW OH OR 030998 597 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN 06/27/94 4.647.73 MW OH OR 030999 T540 RAND McNALLY k COMPANY 06/27/94 171.50 MW OH OR 031000 442 REED VENDING 06/27/94 103.80 MW OH OR 031001 €49 RIT2 CAMERA 06/27/94 14.81 MW OH OR 031002 199 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC.06/27/94 6,044.41 MW OH OR 031003 475 ROLLINS OIL CO 06/27/94 955.90 MW OH r9 4f . V.' f ^j. CITY OP ORONOTMO,. JW 23.1>»4.Check Payee ID.06/23/9410t34 PM---req: OIRIS- -Payee Name OPEN HOLD A/P- -loc; OR-FINCB- - -job: 4068 HJ720---Date Check Amount Type SubsOil 031004 T310 RYAN FORD 06/27/94 278.12 MU OHOR 031005 TS47 S.O.S. PRINTING INC.06/27/94 371.42 MW OHOR031004470SAFE BENEFITS 06/27/94 1,440.36 MW OHOR 031007 T240 SCOTT BEACK 06/27/94 228.00 MW OilOR031000484STAR TRIBUNE 06/27/94 42.50 MW OH OR 031009 740 STREICHERS 06/27/94 32.38 MW OH OR 031010 752 SUBURBAN TIRE INC 06/27/94 196.94 MW OH OR 031011 754 SULLIVAN, STEPHEN 06/27/94 46.73 MW OH OR 031012 1006 SUPERIOR FORD INC 06/27/94 27,902.00 MW OH OR 031013 774 THORPE DIST CO 06/27/94 223.60 MW OH OR 031014 775 TOWN 4 COUNTRY 06/27/94 495.22 MW OH OR 031015 T345 TRI-K SERVICES 06/27/94 131.00 MW OH OR 031014 T143 U OF MINNESOTA 06/27/94 425.00 MW OH OR 031017 815 US WEST COMMUN 06/27/94 241.38 MW OH OR 031018 837 VEE LIN 06/27/94 42.56 MW OH OR 031019 T546 WARREN SHADE 06/27/94 1,413.36 MW OH OR 031020 866 WIDMER INC 06/27/94 851.00 MW OH CHECK REGiSTtttprog: CK200 <l.07>P«9« 4--report Id: CKIIBO--- t SUB TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written Total Void Hand Written Total Machine Written Total Hand Written 0.00 0.00 116,324.74 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: Number of Checks Processed: Number of Checks Processed: Number of Checks Processed: 3 0 80 0 CITY or ORONOTHU, JUH 23, 1994, 10:34 PM 4'06/23/94i^--req: CHRISChmckPayee ID.Payee NameTotal Reversals OPENloc: OR-FINCEDate HOLD A / P-job: 1060 iJ720 CHECK PEC.iSTER. . .prog: CK200 <1.07>Page 5report Id: CKREG--*Check Amount Type Sube Rr»l To Note0.00 Number of Checks Processed:Number of Cherks processed:Total Cancelled CliecksSUBTOTAL 0.00116.324.74 O'0 cm or OROHO OC/23/54THO„ JOB 23, 1934, 10:34 PM---req: aiRIS OPENloc: OR-FINCE HOLD h / P-job: 406S «J720 CHECK REGISTERprog: CK200 <1.07>-*Pm^m C•-r<»pbrt Id: CKREO--*CiMick Payee ID.Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Re I To Note r GRAND TOTALS:Total Void Machine WrittenTotal Void Hand WrittenTotal Machine WrittenTotal Hand Written 0.00O.QOi116.324.740.00 Number or Checks Processed:Number of C.iecks Processed:Numler of Checks Processed:NunUser of Checks Processed; Total Reversals Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: Number of Checks Processed: 30«00 0 0 i-.T 1 1 I INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING CaUNCILMEEIM JUN 2 7 1994 aiYAfOMIIO OF Tim • .1■»» «M. Brmriss-iMW 0«/09/94 ns ISSUS/TEES CQLLfiCTCP NMT 1994PERMIT ISSUED REPORTCITY OF ORONO PAOB:1REgUESTBR: CMIOI^-- CURREUT RANGE -05/01/94 - vl5/31/94 -PREVIOUS RANGE -05/01/95 - 05/51/95 * 'It "'m # , • », #■./■ m.m #'1 'IPm "I- 1 v; •a? ‘P 4- sr-Acc tniucniM un-BtMwmxmhBM>-ACCftS90Rl Ace/aMui0ts M-total OTTf42%5002J5*BASE FEE5.240153.715357 00225 0000b0(U000000005,554,00^VALUATION171,400500477,35225.400.000.000.0015.000 00653.052.iO^PLAN REVIEW BASE FEE3.41502,010232001465.016 0100520500002523*2020412130*060001071305560100 000000505000007,011.00*VALUATION367.400.000.00460.400.0074,070.00220.000.000.000.500 001.130.570.00*PLAN mvini1,209.000.001,St4 .71441.70400.<00.0070.204.014.17*mKnm nwrwm 7 747.12 61.342.00 0.00 2 317.50 25,355.00 0.00mb oqbdxtiohxbo 1 125.00 7.406.00 0,00 I 35.00 2,000.00 0.00rIBBtUIOi2112.50 0.000 .00 0.00 3 117,50 7,405.00 0.00OM LXM XmPBCT 2 70.00 2.500.00 0.00 1 35.00 300.00 0.00BOOT MBK OBLY I 42.50 5,000.00 0.00 1 35.00 750.00 0.00tame270.00 1,500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.0017*1.227.20*06.540 .00*0 .00*0*540.00*34,130.00*0.00* EHhPBB 10 504.33 37.435.06 0 .00 13 651 76 33,440.01 0.00HifiB MBTBE 0 0.00 0.00 0 .00 3 651.00 0.00 0.00BBB^tetal •Mwr B IWtBr 10*504.33*37,435.06*0.00*16*1,342.76*33,440.01*0.00* ipKt cammctiom MMMI COBraCTXOM 4 140.00 0 .00 0.00 0 200.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00■m nmc srsn 1 300,00 0.00 0.00 2 200.00 0.00 0.00 BMV&O ft/0« TAME 0 0.00 0.00 0 .00 I 50.00 0.00 0.00 MC OBLT s 4.000 00 0.00 0.00 5 6,750.00 0.00 0.00mmm. a batih OMr OBfiiMd 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 11*4.510.00*0.00*0 .00*22*7,350.00*0.00*0.00* IJIIM BLTIIATZON 1 200.00 0.00 0 .00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 limm BfBXMKLBA 1 105.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 MB-total 4*305.00*0.00*0.00*1*50.00*0.00*0.00* Oroad-total 01**14.22253**1.017,076.66**5,016 23**05**17,053.76**1,200,740.01**4,0U.)7** tUILDIIIG KECHAKICJU.PLUMBING SEWER k HATER USER SIGN rm•Ml m f^S9C.OO 1,227.20 594.33 4,510.00 305.00 0.00 O.M§%m wmma S,il€.23 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00mmemmmMl. 5C 43.77 19.53 4 .00 1.50 0.00 0.00uc. micM m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00me0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.0*mnntmrtem 90.00 G.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00wmmttaKtSm0.00 0.0012.00 0.004.001.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mam fonu.»■•10»)49.79 1.292.97 411.34 4,514.00 304.SO 0.00 O.M fimt 29I: OkMU .s; ■"I MOSi 10^1amoiM ramiT MOtK AODIt NBJI STREETrax««juil S, 1R94. 10:42 AMIITI ISSUED POR THE MONTH OF MWf 1994ISSUEr rERMl"^ NPB ID NUMPEP *'OMrANYLANDMARK DRCRBBKMOOD TROftONO OAKS DRSHORELINE DRMINNETONKA HOLD LACYGNET RLLONG LAKE RD BTONKAVIBM LANORTH ARM DRTOGO RDSTUBBS BAY RD NBRONN RD 8SPRUCE PLBRONN RD SCOE FARM RDNORTH ARM DRNORTH ARM DRSMITH AVIBLMNOOD AWCASCO POINT RDNORTH SHORE DRSNADYNOOO RDNORTH SHORE DRSPRUCE PLPOX 6TCREEKNOOD TRBIG ISLANDSHADYMOOO RD 34 1374 REST PT RD 3»133S ARBOR ST at 1901 PAOBHMBSS POINT 39 1305 BUNIOOD AW 39 3935 KELLY AW 39 130 CHEVY CHASE DR 30 3SC 3740 SHADYMOOO RD 01 301^BUGARNOOO OR 01 3011 SOGARNOOO DR 01 •55 FOREST ARMS LA 01 1050 OOK FARM RD 01 550 LONG LAKE RD B 01 3133 CASCO CIRox1300PHILLIPS OR 01 440 NORTH ARM DR 01 700 6TH AVB N 01 635 PBRNDALE RD N 01 1295 BRIAR ST 01 3799 PHEASANT RD 01 355 LANDMARK DR 03 3650 CASCO AVB 03 2525 KELLY AVB 34 3035 CASCO POINT RD 39 1135 SPRING HILL RD 94/05/19 OR-94/05/19 OR-94/06/27 OR-94/05/26 OR94/05/05 OR-94/05/19 OR-94/05/13 OR-94/05/04 OR-94/05/12 OR-94/05/26 OR-94/05/02 OR-94/05/06 OR-94/05/17 OR-94/05/06 OR-94/05/20 OR-94/05/26 OR-94/05/02 OR94/05/09 OR- 94/05/11 OR- 94/05/16 OR- 94/05/16 OR- 94/05/20 OR- 94/05/26 OR- 94/05/27 OR- 94/05/31 OR94/05/06 OR94/05/16 OR94/05/16 OR 94/05/25 OR 94/05/02 OR 94/05/06 OR 94/05/13 OR 94/05/16 OR 94/05/27 OR 94/05/18 OR 0060680060900061090061130060520U6061006077006049006071006073005982006055006080006057006097006110006045■006064•006072-006081-006088-006101-006112-006124-006128-006058•006095-006066 -006106 -006046 -006056 -0060/4 -006084 -006120 -005578 94/05/05 94/05/05 94/05/09 94/05/10 94/05/12 94/05/12 94/05/16 94/05/18 94/05/24 94/05/27 94/05/26 94/05/27 94/05/25 94/05/16 94/05/31 94/05/20 >#4/05/02 OR-006051 OR-006059 OR-006063 OR-006067 OR-006075 OR-006079 OR-006087 OR-006094 OR-006104 OR-006105 OR-006116 OR-006122 OR-006123 OR-006085 OR-006127 OR-006098 OR-006048 14499448149736321731315314484 75115448117148351441943003700000000123474180000000019722716oooocooo00000000000000000000000014727581154290001471912400000000000000000000000014719124147265390000000000000000188160301934485314710532 17222345 15376190 00000000 14703939 00000000 00000000 00000000 34461299 34701112 34461299 34988071 39414211 34782452 39414211 24738793 34782452 34461299 00000000 39296767 39414211 39296767 39411044 38274646 39203800 STREETER 6 ASStv'lATES INCMINNESOTA DESIGN 6 ryNSTCHARLES CUDD COMEDCALF CONSTRUCTION INCCtlSTOM COTTAGES LTDJ.M BRUGGEMANJOHN KRAEMER 6 SONS INCCOUNTRY CUSTOM HOMESHIRSCH AL CONSTROEGLIN BARTDALPHIN POOL & SPANORTH SHORE ROOFING 6 EXCBNORTH SHORE ROOFING 6 EXCBSMITH NF ROOFINGLOON BUI DERSDAVID CARLSON COMP INCDANBBRRY COMPANYSMITH THOMAS SINGER CONSTRUCTION.INC. HOMESCAPES INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG 6 COOLING LARSON MASONRY COUNTRYSIDE HTG 6 COOLING WEST AIR KLEVE HTG 6 AC SCHBRBBR & SONS INC KLEVE HTG k AC CITYVIEW PLBG k SCHBRBBR 6 SONS TNC COUNTRYSIDE HTG k COOLING HTG VOGT FRED 4 CO KLEVE HTG 4 AC VOGT FRED 4 CO CENTRAIRE INC UNIQUE INDOOR COMFORT CRONSTROMS HTG 4 AC INC OWNER LAST NMTODDBIEKDAN1EI.SCHUCKSWANTEKDALETAYLORFENNERKOCHKBMPFBOLLISBROWNENALLNBRKALEYMAZERSTBRNAUAHLBERGNELSONKNAPPBROHLANDSIMBYARNB8SCHUBLLBRSTUBBSJBLL180NCARLSONKLOTCHBBLOOM GARCIA CHRISTIANSEN RBGNIBR TROYAK SMITH PAGONI8 OIINER LAST m VALUATIONCAKLSONlO.OBB.OBS.SOB.tB3.S00.BBANDBRSONROf.ttCASEYl.aM.tBB.OM.tBBMGBBRBTSON4.SSB.BCGARCIA40B.BBSUBSS1,SMITH fBt.BBPAASCH.ttANDBRSON.tfROSCO.ftKICKMAPBR.BtMorrATT.ftSTOCKTON.ftPRAUS.ftMHITMAS.ifSTOCKTON.ffRYLB.ff NBLAMBD .ffNBLAMED.ffHOPKINS.ffBOURN.ff DANIELS .ff .ff OWNER LAST NH VALUATION.. . . . . . . . .. . . .. .fAGONIS 1,000.00BOLLIS)»,000.008TBRNAU14,000.00GARCIA1«,002.00SMITH000.004.200.00FBNMeR7,000.00GARCIA400.00PIMT22.S24.00SMAMTBK47.000.00.0010.000.00BROWNB12.000.00CHRISTIANSBN2.000.00RALEY2,140.00JELLISON4,100.007,000.00.00DALE 11.000.00.00CARLSON 4.404.00AHLEBRG4.000.00SUE8S1.000.00RLOTCHB4.000.004.400.00TODD24S.000.00PAASCH.00ROOMIS.000.00NELSON7.000.00RBMPr4,000.00RBCMIBR40,000.00 TAYLOR 2.000.00 4.SOO.OO TAYLOR 200.000.00 AM«RSON .00 SULLIVAN 700.00 MALLMIR 1.000.00 KNAPPEE 2.000.00 CARLSON 2.S00.00 TROYAK 20.000.00 SMITH 2.SOO.OO ROSCO .00 PRAUS 10.002.00 OHLANO l.SOO.OO ANDERSON too.00 BIER 27S.000.00 MBLANBO .00 MELAMED .00i.ato.oo 8TBRNAU soo.oo CARLSON l.SOO.OO CASEY o.ots.oo 1.400.00 BERTHIAUMB l.SOO.OO WORK ID NUMBERN 23 00000000111471912401S4794961012994404001347824S20134461299241722234501247336900100000000011731315304147275910195539042111472653901144947510154719151015739934101000000000124722316231731315329000000000139296767013941421111000000002214733641010000000002394110441100000000 BASK FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE PEE VALUATION PUW RBVIBM1.050.000.001,050.00*0.000.000.00*•o o oo o oooo101!!•1.too.00300.002,000.00*0.000.000.00*0.000.000.00*l,050.00«*o.oo^*0.00*«2.000.00**0 OO^*0.00*« PLAN REVIEM QTY BASE PEE12,242.SO 7 •.71S.500.00 0 0.004..12 80 15,245.50470.400.00 10y 1,250 00150.00•1.90 1 54.0040.9S 1 1,059.500.00 1 330.000.000.00 11 0.000.000.00 4 120.00553.15 1 lot.0020,055.52*no*27,035.50* P. AOS: l : CUOLlt --·-----� lllVt• s,,,1.oso.oo,,,tt.511,1.11 0.00 JS.10 , ... ,. 214.SO o.oo, .... ,0.0010.2015,40 1 .11 •o.ooo.ooo.o oo.ooo.oo o.oo0.000.00o.ooo.oo• o.ooo.oo 0.00o.oo• o.ooo.ooo.ooo.oo 0.00 o.oo o.oo • o.oo o.ooo.oo o.oo• o.ooo.oo0.00 IL&UlS IBIIJ>/fU.S cu,1a:m,·---�, -·••rrtu-1 •••••PE RMIT ISS UED REPO R'l iiMI• 0, 1111 OC/0)/94 CITY OF ORONOPl,£ II T , ••• ••••••►• to tal G 271•�•1 -------------------cuaamn-RANGE -·----on ,. 01/01/94 -05/31/94IIUSP'SS,1 s .oo• 49.471.45••VALUAT IOIIo.oo•PLAN R EV IEII o.oo•YUR-10-IWl'E --•••••--------• • -• • -• ----P•EV I OU S RANGE --- - - -------- - - - -- -01/01/9] -05/11/9]MS& FSS 115.00•51,614.28••VALUATIOIIo.oo•,.,22.s20.,, ••P IM lftl-1.M•1 5 ,4tl.tl••........ •1■OI IUI Pl ...... nr CIIN we. at MC ..... ,, 1,:111 IUT ... •:: If I.IC. Ill: ----lalll1S lSS'PD/IUS mt.lb 'l'W e,,.,.. _�a,mrn-1 ••■ OP atll OC/Ol/MMaana .... UVIDI .. I .... we. auaCN na MC IWllOATlOII BUILDING 11.s,,.so20,055.52 2,9)7.76 0.00 1,,00.00 ,o.oo 0.00 MECHANICAL S,284.97 0.00 189.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ••••• PERMIT FEE REPORT ••••• CITY OF DaONO FROM 01/01/94 TO 05/31/94 PLUMBING SEWER , NATER 4,487.1)8 5,515.00 0.00 0.00 127.92 Ei. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 IIIIIS. Ill ........ 111CJ ,m 54.25 27.00 mr .•-m-,.-.· r' m. anDPT:Z-1:''ft OP IUII o,/ol/t4 .. ....... RMMYID . .. "' WC. IDaCII n1 UC IIIV•IIOATIOII .INIT IIIIL D l!!!P!!IIICJ nu. &"' ,ML l■ltlT TOTAL 51,212.71 RSPOltT TOTAL 49,471.45 20,055.52 1,2,2.47 0.00 s,,oo.oo ,o.oo 0.00 11.is117.25 120.00 1.50 78,C69.44 5,529.51 117.25 120.00 1.50 4,,44.40 9,821.25 ••••• PERMIT FBI REPOPT ••••• CITY OF ORONO Fllc»I 01/01/94 TO OS/31/94 PMIS: llllQUSSTD CAllOLSUSER SIGN r1•• 415.00 1,,. 00 !».00 0.00 0.00 o.ool.�O 0.00 '·" 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 411.50 •••• ,,..., a ltSQUSSTD z CUOL8 ,•. L....... __ ... MIi o• JIIIIIT nn lMCI ICII ·=·e&al I 11# total �· IIDtl llVI• we. IIUCII r : • IBLYJT 'IOTAL .. 94 RBQUBSTBI:CMWLBMATERUSERSIOMPIM15.00 415.00 109.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.006.00 1.50 0.00 0.00000.00 0.00 0.001O•Oo0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.25io.oo!8.25 41€.50 109.00 0.00 YBtft-TO-DKIE ftBOUCSTCRbase fee VALUATIOM pum uviw(•{•*2.255.005.075.001.425.000.00250.00150.009,155.00*9,155.00**0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00*0.00**ItBQUISTni!im%0» CmiMCI CITIC9sn.1l B.M U.M 0.00 192.10109.10 75.00».00 29.00 29.00m.M 190.00 412.1010 22T9111.41 m.ts 191.00W.01 141.00 MS.OOs.oo 29.10 25.00211.41 1.191.1S Ml.0019111111 1.7I1.S4t.lH.Ma . ' '. ' j I • I i TOI Mayor and City Council ntOM: Roa Moone. Cicy �-tf'/i1 DATE: June 22. 19M SIJUECT: City AdminisUIMJr Pama.I Leave I will DOI be in die office from Tbunday. June 23 to Friday. July I due to die birth of our Bond cbild. I ;,.., is 9'hr ctllled to be indnccd Tlaanday fflOfflUII. We hope to be able to ,._,,.,,.. • new family member by Tlllanday afternoon. I can be �bed II home durinl lbe • E Ek of June 27 at 71(). 1480. 23 to Friday. July 1 due to the bifth of our Thursday momiog . We hope to be able to I can be leached at home durit^ the\*Jji Mayor and Orono CouncilmembersJeanne A. Mabusth. Buildinf A, Zoning AdministratorDecember 30. 1993 Subject:Schedule for Councilm embera* Attendance at Planning Commission Meetings for 1994 The foOouring n a schedule of assigned attendance for Councilmembers to attend the Planning Coomissioo meetings for the ytzi 1994: January 18, 1994 (Tuesday) J.Dtann Goetten February 22. 1994 (Tuesday) Jo Ellen Hurr March 21. 1994 Gabriel Jabbour April 18. 1994 Charles Kelley May 16. 1994 Edward Callahan. Jr. June 20. 1994 J.Diann Goetten July 18. 1994 Jo Ellen Hurr August 15. 1994 Gabriel Jabbour September 19, 1994 Charles Kelley (October 17, 1994 Edward Callahan November 21. 1994 J.Diann Goetten No December Meeting Optional meetings may be held on Che first Monday of the month commencing May through October. Optional mcctlogs are scheduled at staff’s dlscretioo depending upon the number of land use applicatioos filed the previous month. Counctlmemhers will be notified as as an optional meeting Is scheduled. /r I) ♦ ctlinembenZooiag Adminiscrator(enhance at Plaiming Commissioa Meetiiigs for ice for CouncUmembers to attend tbe Planning Tuesday) letten (Tuesday) XT KMir lahan, Jr. )etien xnir 4 ley lahan 4 wtten ting ly of the month commencing May through Ps discretion depending upon the number MINtTCS OF THE CITir OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSIONMEETING HELD ON MAY Id, I9MATTENDANCEThe Orono Planning Commissioo met on May 16, 1994 in the Oiono City Council Cb*mbeis with the foHowing memben pcesent: Chair Charles Schroeder, Comm^ssioacrs Charles i<3lan. Steve Peterson, Janice ^rg, Candace Rowlette, and Dale Lindquist. Cdmmittionrr Sandra Sauth was absent. The following represented suff: Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron. and City Recorder Barbara Anderson. Chair Schroeder called the mrrfing to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) #1«S3 TANDEM PROPERTIES, WATERTOWN ROAD • PREUMINARY StWUVISION • PiWLIC HEARING TO BE RESCHEDCLED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 20,1994 AT APPUCANTS REQUEST. (#2) #1999 PAT WOLFE, 2B71 CASCO POINT ROAD • APTER-THE FACT VARIANCES • PUBLIC HEARING • APPLICATION WTIHDRAWN BYCmr (#3) #1904 ERIC AND SHELLY UUEQUIST, 34M BIRCH LANE • CONDmONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE • PUBLIC HEARING Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were on file with the City. Mabusth reviewed the staff report and stated that staff recommended approval of the requests subject to the conditioos listed in the staff report. Nolan commented that he feh that the grading was going to be close and was «iasure that the swale would soKe the drainage problems. Mabusth stated that this was what the City Engineer had recommended and that staff will require a final grading plan with building permit application for the engineer’s review. Erk Liljequist stated that he had understood that the purpose of tbe depression was to hold the water before it ran off into the lake and now they were creating a swale to facilitate drainage into the lake which was confusing. Mabusth reviewed the elevations and the engineer’s recommendation for mitigating the filling of the flood plain as required by federal flood control regulations. Nolan commented that the reason for the swale was to provide relief if the lake level rose above normal and provide somewhere for the water to go. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of #1V0^ Conditional Use PermitA^ariance for Eric and Shelly Liljequist at 3940 Birch Lane subject to the conditioos noted in tbe engineer’s report and requiring the applicant and the engineer to resolve questions regarding the elevations prior to City Cbuncil leview. Ayes 6, nays 0. LANNING COMMISSIONi\ 14, \f94 HONirTES or THE 0«0N0 PlAWnWG COBOOaHEIJ>ON MAY lA, l«M SION MEETING 994 in the Orooo City Council ir Charles Schroeder. Commissioners c Rowlette, and Dale Lindquist, ring represented staff: Building and anning and Zoning Administrator [son. Chair Schroeder called the WATERTOWN ROAD - lEARING TO BE RESCHEDU^D MEETING OF JUNE 24,1994 AT LOAD • APTER-THE FACT CATION WITHDRAWN BY CITY 1499 BIRCH LANE - CONDITIONAL ING Dg and Affidavit of Publication were eport and stated that staff le conditions listed in the staff report, going to be close and unsure that »usth stated that this was what the City lire a final grading plan with building he purpose of the depression was to low they were creating a swale to ig. Mabusth reviewed the elevations the filling of the flood plain as in commented that the reason for the ►ove normal and provide somewhere I recommend approval of #l9u» lly Liljequist at 3940 Birch Lane iport and requiring the applicant and vations prior to City Council leview. (#4> 1911 ERNEST LEMMERMAN,4tttTONKAVIEW LANE-VARIANCES. COWTINCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication were on file with the Qty. Mabusth reviewed the staff report and outlined the area that was buddahle. Ernest Lemmermaa was present. Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing continued from a pervious meeting. Ken Hickey staled he owned the lot immediately adjacent to that of the applicant, and suted he had sent a letter to the Planning Commission. He sUted he was opposed o building on this lot because it n substandard, and it will cause erosion in the area. He befieveo the buildaMe area was too close to h» house. Rowlette inquired about the average lot sizes in the area and Mabusth responded that they are all half-acre 1 plus acres in this area, and she noted that the subj^ lot » .78 acres in area. Lemmermaa commented that he had purchased the land so that his homestead lot would be larger and more usable. Mabusth noted that the property had sewer available and would have been issued a buildiag permit if the lot contained .8 acres or 80% of required area. Discussion ensued legardiag the lot line reanangement and the lop of bluff definition as it would apply to the subject properly. Lindquist sUted that he had problems with the application because the proposed lot area was under half an acre and the potential for further variances being requested in the future because of the size of the building envelope. Mabusth reviewed the building em'elope locatioa that complied with Orono stewards. Lindquist questioned whether the lot was buildaMe given it’s size. Schroeder stated that the Planning Commission had approved the lot line rearrangement with the proposed areas and dimensions and he felt that they could not take the position that the lots were now too small. Nolan commented that since they had approved the lots, then needed to make it the best it can be given the parameters they have available. He preferred to give the applicant a reasonable building envelope and see something built that was feasible. Hickey stated he felt that the lot should not be built on and while he has had an opportunity to purchase the properly he felt it was too expensive. Chair Schroeder stated that the Planning Commission could approve the request with a note in the file that the Planning Commission would look at changing the building envelope through review when plans were formally submitted. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of #1911 lot area variance as proposed and a building envelope as defined by the required setbacks for Ernest Lemmerman at 4620 Tonkaview Lane, with the requirement that the sketch of the defined building envelope be included as part of the resolution granting approval of the area variance in order to alert a future owner of the unique sloped building envelope. Ayes 5, nays 1. Lindquist stated he felt the lot area was too small to contain ivm OF HIE oaONO rLANMNC ccHEtD ON MAY 14^ I9M K t K’SION HNG(#4) 1911 ERNEST LEMMERMAN,4fl4TONIUV1EW LANE-VAMANCES- CONTINUATION Of PUBLIC HEARING ^CONTINUED) A suitable buildiiqi envelope. (#S) #1912 TIM HILLMAN, 4M LEAF STREET • VARIANCES • REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ADMTIONAL REVIEW Mnbwth reviewed tbe staff report and tbe options avaiUMe to tbe Planning Conunissioo. Tin Hilbnan was present aiMl staled that to reduce tbe anount of lot coverage be proposed to remove tbe smallest sbed and reduce tbe area of tbe npper deck from 6' x 25* to 6' X 14*. He believed tbai this would be adequate to meet the ordinance requirements. Chair Scbroeder inquired if tbe applicaat was wilUng to redesign tbe entryway and Hillmaa responded that be would consider it. Nolan stated that because of tbe easement tbe setback variances were substantially intensiSed which concerned him. He felt that if tbe piMM were redes^ned to meet tbe side year setback be would be much more inclined to support it. Cbmmisi ione rs Rowlette, Berg, and Lindquist concurred. Rowlette stated she was concemed about tbe potential for further development in the area and tbe driveway being tbe only means of access for those properties and becoming a roadway in tbe future. Chair Scbroeder commented be felt that the entryway on tbe south side needed to be reduced or relocated so that it was at least 30 ’ fr^ tbe lot line. Lindqubt moved to recommend approval of #1912 for Tim Hillmaa with tbe understanding that the exbtir^ small shed and portkNis of tbe upper deck would be removed to bring lot coverage into compliance with ordinance standards and the south side yard setback requirements because tbe easement may someday serve added residential development. Chair Scbroeder stated he was reluctant to approve the request as submitted, and other CoHunbsionets appeared to feel that way also. He felt that if the applicant wbhed to resubmit plans that conform to directives of the Commission that the Planning Commission could take action at a future meeting. He felt that the best action was to table the request to allow the applicant to explore possible revisions to tbe plans. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Rowlette, to table #1912 Variances for Tim Hillman at 400 Leaf Street, to allow the applicant to redesign the proposal. Ayes 6. nays 0. ZIT'- MINUTES Of THE OHONO PLANNING CXHELD ON MAY t«M:i s vi :ij,MEETING <#•> #1915 GEORGE APTLERAIJH 4109 HIGHW CONTINUATION OF PURUC HEARING lit ROAD - VARIANCES Chair Schroeder noted that the Orti6catc of Mailing and the Affidavit of PnMication were on 6le with the City. Mabusth discussed the suff report and reviewed the options available to the Planning Cdmniissioo. Rowlette and Nolan sUted that they would like to see addition il reduction of hardcover within the 0-75 setback area. Chair Schroeder noted that there should not be any plastic located in this area and the second access stain in the 0-75 and they were looking for additional hardcover reductions. George Applebam staled he needed the second waUcwiqr to get his lawn nower to the different laveb and also he has elderly patents who have ^fficulty with steps. Nolan stated that it would still be possible to puU the lawn mower over grass, and Mr. Applebaum concurred that would be passible. He discussed other areas of hardcover he was willing to remove. The cost of maintainiag the boat house was discussed. Rowlette stated she feh that the applicant should reduce the amount of hardcover and the amount of the other variances, and she felt the request should be tabled. Discussioo ensued regarding the amount of hardcover on the lot. Ntdan staled that he felt this was a very intensely developed lot, aiNl he would like to see the amount of hardcover reduced. Chair Schroeder noted this was a puMic hearing, but no one wished to address the Commissioo. Applebaum sUted that they were not doing any constnictioii in the Muff area and Mabusth illustrated this area on the survey. She stated that the concerns were the visual impact and potential for erosion atul the construction was within the required setback area. Chair Schroeder commented that be felt the hardcover was the main issue and he would like to see it reduced ugnificantly so that it was closer to the ordinaime requirements. Applebaum inquired if removal of the deck by the boat house would help and Nolan ded affirmatively, and noted that would be moving in the right direction. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend approval of #1915 Variances for George Applebaum at 4109 Highwood Road, with the provision that the boat house deck be removed in addition to areas #11 and #12 and tte plastic underlinen because the steep topography has created undue hardship for the applicant. Ayes 5. nays 0. Rowlette stated she felt more hardcover reduction should be done and was not comfortable forwarding the request to the City Council. (#7) #191S JAMES K. AND JULIE ANN LYNCH-DANIELS, 1225 ORONO OAKS DRIVE • RENEWAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Gaffioo reviewed the staff report and stated that staff recommended approval of the request for renewal of a wetland setback variance and conditional use permit for Nvres OF THE OtCWO fLAWWG COMMISSIONHELHONMAV I«» I9N TING (#7) #lfft JAMES K. AND JUUE ANN LVNCH-DANIELS, 1225 ODONO OAKS DWVE • RENEWAL CONDmONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES - COrniNUATION OF PURUC HEARING (CONTINUED) • :i tcoostmcttag a driveway, subject to the oowlitioas listed in the staff report. Bill stated be was the desagner and builder and was present representing the applicants iner Chair Schroeder noted this was a pnbhc hearing, and no one present wished to address the Cbnunission. Bonner staled that they had snbaiitled a new survey for completion of the driveway started some years ago, and he noted that they are moving a portion of the original fill which was misplaced, back withia the existing easement boundary. He slated they propose to put in a new culvert and move more fill in so that the fill will cany the we^t of the traffic. He introduced Max Norton, the landscape architect, who concurred with this. It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend approval of #1918 Conditional Use Permit for Janies K. and Julie Ann Lynch-Daaiels at 1225 Orono Oaks Drive, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#S) #1919 TV BUCEY, 2fi77 CASCO POINT ROAD • VARIANCES • SECOND PUBLIC HEARING • RENOTIFICATION Chair Schroeder noted that the Ortificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of PuMicatioa were on file with the City. Gafffon reviewed the staff report. Chair Schroeder read a petition which had been submitted by neighborhood resi^nts in support of the applicatioo and a letter from the neighbor directly to the north. Dr. Carl Shutts, into the record. Chair Schroeder noted that the drainage issue appeared to have been resolved and the applicant has reduced th height of the house a^ g^raf^ to address the concerns of adjacent residents. Rowlette commented that it appeared that the boat house needed some repairs made and she stated that if the cost of those repairs exceeded 75% of the value of the boat house, then it would have to be removed. Gaffion reviewed the ordinance requirements relating to structures within the 0-75 foot setback area and how they applied to boat houses. Nolan stated that while there was sojie reduction in height, he was concerned about the building footprint area. Mr. Bucey responded that they have added a deck and made a connection between the house and garage, but essentially the footprint is the same as the original house. Nolan stated he felt the house was too large for the lot. Chair Schroeder stated that the house had been lowered significantly which would help with the sight lines from the adjacent residential properties. Peterson commented he HJTES OF THE 0«ONO riAWWC C<HELD ON MAY l«» 19M MEETING<#t) #|f If TY tUOSY, nrr CASCO POINT tOAD - VAWANCES • SECOND PUBLIC HEABIM^ > RENOTinCATION (CONTINUED) J was satisfied that the applicant had done what the Planning CommisskNi requested, and he feh there were times when grading would need to be done within a bluff area. He stated he supported the proposal. Mr. Mitchell staled he was an attorney represeatiag Mr. and Mrs. Louis Smeriing, and they were appreciative of the changes that the applicanta had made to address their concerns. He submitted a letter which detailed items which still concern the Smerlings. These include that the house be buih according to Orono building codes and they add shutters to the windows facing the Smerlinp property. They ate also concerned regarding the drainage and trust that it will be satisfactorily resolved. Lindquist asked if the Smerlings and Bucey’s agreed to the terms listed in the letter and all responded affirmatively. Rowletle suted she feh that the revised plans showed a definite improvement but she was not in favor of any increase in hardcover on the property. •lI I*It was moved by Lindquist, Variances for Ty Bucey at 2677 Casco Point Road with the submitted letter being part of the applkation per the revised plams. Ayes 5, nays 1. Nolan stated he feh that the bouse was too large for the site. (#f> #inS PETER BOVEE, Mt OLD LONG LAKE ROAD • VARIANCES • PUBLIC HEARING Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of PuMkatioo were on file with the City. Gaffinw reviewed the staff report and stated that staff recoiamended approval of the request for a side setback variance to increase the roof pitch in a substandard setback area, based on the findings listed in the staff report. Charles Nolan inquired as to (he existing bouse not conforming to the footprint shown on the submitted survey. Peter Bovee was |»esent and stated that there h«i been a deck extending from the master bedroom which had been removed, and he would like tc put a roof over the area, possibly to put back a covered deck or expand the bedroom. Lindquist commented that the survey was not current and it should be up to date priar to City Council review of the application. He feh that the Commission could approve raising the roof, but any other changes to the proposal should be resubmitted. Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing, but no one present wished to speak on this item. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend approval of #1925 variances for Peter Bovee at 840 Old Long Lake Road, to allow the applicant to raise the roof. Ayes 6, na)^ 0. /1 k ims OF THE OMONO PLANBiING COMMISSION MEETINGHELD ON MAY I9M(#!•) #l«r MAKY K. MCCAimr, 24$ TONKA AVENUE • VARIANCE • PUBLICHEARING Chair Schroedcr noted that the Certificate of Maihng and the Affidavit of PublicatkHi were on file with the City. Mabnsth reviewed the staff report. Chair Schroeder noted thn was a public hearing. Dan Vaughn, 3440 Bayside Road, stated they had attempted to lepUt Paiceb 1 and 2 several years ago and the proposed development may adversely impact their plans. He asked if W would be adequate distance from the applicant’s house and when they aught build. Mary McCarthy responded that she is required to meet the setback requirements for a two acre lot and she feh that she had done a good job of designing the house. Mabusth stated that the applicaat has requested approval based on the concept plan, but final house plans have not yet been drawn. Chair Schroeder stated he felt that the applicaat should submit formal plans because be was not comfortable granting a variance for something they haven ’t seen. Commission members noted that on many reviews formal plans are not drafted because applicants are only seeking direction from the City. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of #1927 lot area and rear setback variances for Mary K. McCarty at 245 Tonka Avenue because this is in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood and the »ol is very shallow and to allow for preservatioa of existing mature trees. Ayes 6. nays 0. (#11) #lt2t SUZANNE K. WACKER, IIIS BROWN ROAD SOUTH • RENEWAL VARIANCE • PUBLIC HEARING Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publicatioo were on file with the City. Mabusth reviewed the staff report. She noted that in the previous review the shed in the rear yard was to be relocated to meet required setbacks and with the current proposal the new owner plans the removal. She noted that the applicaat wished to expand the garage from 22’ to 24’ and that structure would encroach no further into the street setback area. Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing, but no <Nie wished to speak. It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend approval of #1928 variance for Suzanne K. Wacker at 1115 Brown Road South subject to removal of the shed in the rear yard prior to final inspection. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#12) #1929 ALONZO B. SERAN, III, 4899 HIGHWOOD ROAD • VARIANCES • PUBUC HEARING Gaffion reviewed the staff report and the request for area width, side setback and hardcover variances, and discussed the drainage in the area. Mr. Seran was present and stated that there is a significant amount of runoff onto his property from adjacent properties located upstream, but he felt that he could manage it by doing some tiling and minutes of the OHONO riANNINC cHELD ON MAY lA, ISM tSSION MEETING<#12) #1929 ALONZO B. SERAN, III, 4999 HICmAiPUBLIC HEARING (CONTINUED)ROAD • VARIANCES dirccsiag of the water kia ': I inA|iii«t inquired if the house could be moved closer to the lot line and Mr. Seran lespoaded that he had designed the house to allow more room for the mature Red Oak Pinwood trees which exist as shewn on the site plan. Nolan stated he felt that the topography between the house and the lakeshore should be looked at by the City Ettgiacer because it was a very sensitive area. He commented that the City does not normally allow any grading within the 0-75' setback area. It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of #1929 variances for Alonzo B. Scran, III at 4099 Highwood Road, to allow replacement of the principal structure subfect to approval of am integrated drainage plan. Ayes 5, nays 1. Rowlette steted she would have preferred to have discussed some hardcover removal in the 0-75 ’ setback area. (#13) #1930 MARGARET B. COST, 253 BROWN ROAD SOUTH • VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Chaur Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing amd the Affidavit of Publkatioo were on file with the City. Mabusth reviewed the staff report. Margaret Cost and Clark Easier, the architecL were present. Nolan inquired what was the grade of the driveway and Mr. Engler responded that it was 9%. Chaur Schroeder noted that this was a public hearing. Adrian amd Pam Kearney, 265 South Brown Rcmd, were present amd Mr. Keamiey stated they were concerned about the driveway's setback from their properly line and feh the applicant could reduce the size of the house to meet the setback so the variance would not be required. They were also concerned about the preservation of the trees located in the vicinity of the proposed septic site which fHovide the only screening between their house and the prop^d structure. Mr. Kearney feh that a smadler house would require a smaller septic system. They were abo concerned about the driveway and he noted that the County Department of Transportation had stated that they would like to see the existing entrance cl^d off and a shared entrance created. He stated they would like to work with the applicant to retain as much of the existing circle as possible and preserve some of the trees. Discussion ensued regarding sight distances and possible means of access for both properties. Chair Schroeder commented that the separate driveway had been approved so the Commission could not address that issue, but be felt that the applicant and the Kearney ’s could work together to resolve this. Pam Kearney stated they feel there is a great deal of erosion which has occurred on the east side of the property which may have created a bluff situation. She noted that the MIMJTfiS OF THE OM>!SO PLANMMG COHELDONMA%' l«w v! L! I sionmehing(#13) #1«3§ MARGARET B. COST, 253 MOWN ROADPtWJC HEARING (CONTINUED)UTH • VARIANCES eievatioas on tbe survey did not a^>pear to reflect the real elevations that exist today. Mabusth noted that the topographic information had been provided with the Byfield Plat review and no land alterations hrul taken place on the subf^ property. Discussioo ensued regarding the possible location of the septic system. Nolan stated he felt that the house could be redesigned to fit into the build^le area on the site and reduce the size of the building footprint. Discussion ensued regarding ahemative locations for the driveway and the bouse. Cha?* Schroedcr stated that the Commission was only acting on tbe structural setback variance from the tributary. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of #1930 structural setba^ variance fiom a protected tributary for Margaret B. Cost at 255 Brown Road South subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Ayes 5, nays 1. Nolan stated be felt the bouse was too ambitious for the site. (#14) #1931 MEGAN TULLY AND JAMES MCMANUS, 1910 SHADVW CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE • PUBLIC HEARING .i:» f ROAD Chair Schroeder noted that the Ortificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication were on file with the City. Gaffron reviewed the staff report and staled that staff retommended apptwal of the request to replace a lakeshore retaining wall and stairway, sul^ect to the coiiditions listed in the staff report. James McManus stated that they do not plan to do any work on tbe north side so they are in agreement with the staff report. He stated they would do everything possible to minimize erosion. He stated they would prefer to use keystone instead of timbers. Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing; no one present wished to speak. Rowlette inquired if the keystone would change anything, and Gaffion responded that it wouldn't, indicating it was just a different material with a somewhat different look than timber. Nolan inquired if tbe applicants had considered what they would do to stabilize the area iminediately adjacent to the lake, possibly by adding boulders or additional rip rap to stabilize the shoreline. McManus indicated be would consider doing this. It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Rowlette. to recommend approval of #1931 Conditional Use Permit/Variance for Megan Tully and James McManus at 1910 Shadywood Road to allow replacement of ? retaining wall stn'Cture. with the conditions that the vegetation be replaced, a work plan be submitted to the City, and the time limit for construction be a period of two weeks from commencement of work. Ayes 6, nays 0. WONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGHELD ON MAY It. 1994rr, 255 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCES .1NUED)pear lo reflect the real elevations that exist today, c information had been provided with the Byfield Plat taken place on the subject property. ssible location of the septic ^tem. Nolan stated be ned to fit into the buildable area on the site and firint. itive locations for the driveway and the house. Chat. oa was only acting on the structural setback variance by Berg, to recommend approval of #1930 rotected tributary for Margaret B. Cost at 255 Brown 5 listed in the staff report. Ayes 5. nays 1. Nolan >itious for the site. JAMES MCMANUS, I9lt SHADYW IT/VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING in I ROAD ificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication reviewed the staff report and sUted that staff It to replace a lakeshore retaining wall and stairway, staff report. James McManus stated that they do I side so they are in agreement with the staff report. K>ssible to minimize erosion. He stated they would l»ers. •lie bearing; no one present wished to speak, uld change anything, and Gafffon responded that it rent material with a somewhat different look than nts had considered what they would do to stabilize lake, p^ibly by adding boulders or additional rip BUS indicated be would consider doing this. Rowlette. to recommend approval of #1931 Megan Tully and James McManus at 1910 It of r? retaining wall «tr.:cture, with the conditions k plan be submitted to the City, and the time limit cks from commencement of work. Ayes 6, nays 0. MINUTES OF mr ORONO PLANNING tXMMMISSION MEETINGHELD ON MAY 14,1994(#15) #1992 ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT #271,5t5 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD •CONDmONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE • PUBLIC HEARING Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication were on file with the City. Mabusth reviewed the staff report. Neal Lawson was present representing the Orooo ^hool District. Peterson inquired if the building could be relocated to eliminate the variance, and Lawson responded that no matter where the building was located on the site it would interfere with the fence or the ball fields. Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing, and no the Commission. present wished to address It was moved by LindquisL seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of #1932 Conditional Use Permit/Variance for Orono School District #2^^ at 685 Old Crystal Bay Road. Ayes 6, n^ 0. (#16) #1934 RRH AND COMPANY, 716 GANDER ROAD • VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication were on file with the City. Gafton noted that the applicant was not present and briefly reviewed the staff report for the benefit of the neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Rhetts, who were present. Lindquist inquired if there would be a problem with the low depression in the area where a driveway would go, and Gaffron responded that it would have to be filled. Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing. Mr. Rhetts noted he had submitted a letter which the Commission had, and that be was opposed to using the existing septic sites but since staff recommended ahematives he felt would be good for the environment, he would support it. Gaffron stated that if the ordinance was changed to not require the setback variances requested, this applicatimi will not be back before the Planning Commission. It was moved by Rowlette seconded by Lindquist, to table #1934 Variar4ces for RRH and Company at 710 Garider Road. Ayes 6, nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS (#17) #1865 LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC„ 2675 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH • REVIEW OF AMENDED SKETCH PLAN Chair Schroeder noted that three memben of the Planning Commission felt they had conflicts of interest, and Peterson. Rowlette, and Berg left the table for this discussion. Mabusth reviewed the proposal. Terry Forbord, Vice President of Lundgren Brothers Construction Company introduced John Uban. of Dahigren, Shardlow and Uban. f i MINUTKS OK TIIK ORONO IM^VNNlNCi COMMISSION MEtTI'INCi HELD ON MAY 16. 1994 / (#17) #1885 LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2675 SIXTH A\TNUE NORTH - REVIEW OF AMENDED SKETCH PLAN (CONTINUED) Forbord and Uban gave an overview of the project and detailed the changes from the previous submittal. Forbord stated they have reduced the density in the project because the wetland laws have changed significantly and have directly impacted how they can develop the property. He noted that the school had taken more land in the are for institutional purposes. He stated they propose one acre lots on the south portion and two acre lots on the northern part of the site. Lindquist inquired if they would have to provide mitigation areas for the wetland areas they disturbed. Forbord responded that they will work with the City to determine where those areas will be as they aren't sure at this time just how much wetland area is involved. Uban reviewed the goals and described the wetlands on the site and how they plan to create a healthier complex of wetlands. He discussed how mitigation would be addressed. Forbord stated that the wetlands on the site have been severely impacted by the agricultural use of the land. Runoff from the site is contaminated and is not being treated. They will be meeting the requirements for cleaner and better managed runoff as required by state and federal wetland management laws. Discussion ensued regarding the Comprehensive Plan determination that this area should have sewer. Gaffron stated that when the issue of serving this area was discussed they took into consideration the soils and the high water table. Discussion ensued regarding the drainage patterns in the area. Chair Schroeder inquired what the actual proposed density was and Forbord responded they are proposing 44 units tc ''onstructed. He stated they would not know exactly what the numbers would be un.n the project was completed. He explained the process of determining feasibility for the development and noted that the costs of developing this site will be three to four times higher than normally found in a development given the problems on the property and the distance or location of water and sewer service. He stated they have requested sketch plan review to determine if the City would approve the idea of the development prior to their investment of additional monies in the project. Nolan inqujr*-d ab'?ut open space on the site and Forbord responded that they would prefer to have Ijirgtr open spaces which would be of more benefit than numerous small open spaces throughout the site. Chair Schroeder inquired what the average lot size would be, including the open space, and Uban responded that 30% of the site would be open space and the lots would be approximately .85 acre in size, if they develop 44 lots. Forbord discussed the buffering from Willow and stated they would be working with the City to determine the best means of achieving this. Nolan asked about the extensive grading proposed on the site and Forbord described the Heather Run development in Plymouth and explained how they enhanced the area through grading and design to MINUTES OF niE ORONO l»Iv\NNING COMMISSION MEEllNG HEI.I) ON MAY 16, 1994 (#17) #1885 LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2675 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - REVIEW OF AMENDED SKETCH PLAN (CONTINUED) create site amenities. He noted that to change the topography to the e.xtent proposed would be very costly. He requested the Commission to give him some indication of how the City would like to see the open space areas developed. Mayor Callahan stated that the City Council had indicated that they would prefer to keep the density at 2 acres per lot, although they were not closed to the idea of using the PUD zoning classification. Lindquist stated that he was not sure what the right number of lots would be but he would like to see larger lots and smaller or fewer outlets created. Nolan stated he felt the concept of clustering on the site made sense, but he was not sure there should be so many lots. He felt that there should be more buffering between Willow and the adjacent lots, and some combinations of lots that would work better. He felt that the development could work with some redesign. Lindquist commented that perhaps the developer would wish to reconsider the amount of open space included in the plan, because sometimes it was difficult to get the Park Commission to accept it. Chair Schroeder stated he would like to see clustering for this site because it made sense given the fact that it was a relatively featureless property. He commented that perhaps the applicants should consider having outlots along Willow to provide buffering. He felt that efforts should be made to keep as much of the rural character as possible as that is the way that Orono has developed, and he felt that 44 lots would be too intense. He felt that the range should be between 29 to 35 lots. Chair Schroeder commented he felt that the project as proposed would not be compatible with adjacent existing and proposed future uses. He felt the density should be reduced, the wetlands upgraded, and the bike trail installed along Willow and connected to the school property. He felt there were other uses for open space, but was unsure what those should be. TTie Commission felt that landscaping should be installed along Willow and the western border of the property to provide buffering and screening from adjacent properties. Forbord inquired if they could obtain park dedication credit for Outlot A and whether the Planning Commission could determine the amount of benefit to the Community. He inquired if they would approve the development density as proposed. Chair Schroeder commented that parks were expensive to maintain and he did not feel that the need for having a large open space was any incentive for a trade-off to get the 44 lot density. 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 16, 1994 PLANNING COMxMlSSION COMMENTS (#18) SET DATE AND TIME FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON B-2 ZONING AMENDMENT After brief discussion, the Planning Commission established June 6, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time to hold the public hearing on the B-2 zoning amendment. (#19) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 9, 1994 There was no Planning Commission representative present at the May 9, 1994 City Council meeting. (#20) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION There were no other issues discussed. (#21) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE APRIL 18, 1994 MEETING It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the April 18, 1994 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Ayes 6, nays 0. (#22) PLANNING COMMISSION TO SELECT A REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND THE JUNE 13, 1994 MEETING OF THE COUNCIL Lindquist volunteered to attend the June 13, 1994 meeting of the City Council ADJOURNMENT Schroeder moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn the meeting. Ayes 6, nays 0. The meeting was adjourned at 12:35 a.m. Respectfully submitted. Charles J. Schroeder, Chairman i ■■***»■: !1 itii I I IffliMii 'inI i;-' t ■ ' fc V ■ 06-'24'9-l 18:31 FAX 612 332 6180 barton-aschman (21001- 005 BAaTON*ASeHMAN ASSOClATESi INC. Ill THIRD AVfNUt SOUTH. SUITE 360 MINNEAPOLIS. MN SSAOi. USA TELEPHONE: (813) 332-0431 fAX (812) 332-S16C PAABONS DATE:& "Z-H TO: Oror\o Cou(\c\\ M.rrvV» «.r-^ CLIENT: CITY OroAo FAX NO os\o TIMS M: lO A.M NO. OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS) SUBJECT-tAe.^r<KV>»^ C_emm “Wet ^6.^\\f\c^ FROM JOB NO OTHER INSTRUCTIONS HARO CCrY( V.iLL)/ WL;. NOT FO-’-C/.’ !N MA^L (Circle One) 9\e \n* eo<.eV> c_> C.OWfvtC\4 w\e.<A\>«.r To pr«.V-\ Vo^fvVc. v.|0>-> BARTON-ASCHMAN associates , INC. •r T--r Av?-..e So'v h. Su.lf» 35C • V'^ncanc s M;n-escia 35^0* USA • (6*2i 332-CA2- • Fa*: (612) 232-b'eO MEMORANDUM TO:Trunk Highway 12 Mediation Committee COPIES TO:Charles Siggerud, Mn/DOT Metro Division Valerie Reinaas, Mn/DOT Metro Division, Project Manager Roger Williams, Mediation Services FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Stave Ruegg June 24, 1994 Traffic Fore^iisting Initiation and Socioeconomic Data for TH 12 Corridor analysis for alternatives within this coiridor. The impact analysis will use ^e residts of the traffic forecast (along with other information) to evaluate the alternatives. The Barto - Aschman project manager for the traffic forecasting work is Mr. Steve Ruegg, who will attend the Tuesday meeting. General Methodology The travel forecasting effort will use the recently-developed regional forecast model, modified to suit the particular needs of this study. The regional model, develope join y y Mn/DOT and the Metropolitan Council, used the widely-accepted traditional four-step travel demand forecasting process. Briefly, these steps are. 1.Trip Generation:In this step, socioeconomic data is used to estimate the number and types of trips made in vehicles from particular geo^aphic areas known as lYaffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). The regional model uses, 1165 TAZs for the seven-coimty metro area. 2.Trip Distribution:The trips originating from each zone are distributed to destination zones. The amount of trips distributed between any two zones (i.e., a production zone where a trip begins and an attraction zone where a trip ends) is proportional to the total number of trips originating at the production zone and terminatmg at the destination zone. In addition, the trips are inversely proportional to the travel time between the zones. PAHSONS TPANSPORTATlON OPOUP A.- £;-£■ Cccc':-f':ry ifrc'cye- r 00-24*94 lb:0i i-A.V ol2 oiou 0.*\A A ».*.» - a.'A.\. BARTON'ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 3.Mode Choice:Once the number of trips between each zone pair is determined, the proportion of trips using each mode i$ determined. Modes typically Include transit, auto driver, and auto passenger. Estimation of travel by mode allows us to determine the number of vehicle-trips. 4.Trip Assignment:Between each piir of zones, the vehicle*trips pre iously deteimined are assigned to one or more routings, or paths using available roadways. The selection of the paths is based on minimizing the travel time between the zones. Slower speeds resulting from traffic congestion is considered in this calculation. Socioeconomic Data The immediate task at hand is to assemble the necessary socioeconomic data for input to the trip generation step. Specifically, the basic data necessary includes population, households, retail employment and non-retail employment, by TAZ. We will begin by using data for 1994, and then proceed to use year 2015 forecasts. Because of the requirements of a detailed forecast of traffic in the TH 12 corridor, we will subdivide the regional TAZs into subzones. The smaller subzones will support a much more detailed roadw'ay network, allowing us to forecast traffic on many more roadways which would not otherwise be included in the regional model. Xote that the area described will be modeled in detail, but the entire regional model will still be used in executing the model. Outside the detailed area, the regular regional model level of detail will be used. Therefore, the influence of other regional roadway facilities will be taken into account. The subdivision has been defined geographically. A total of 29 regional TAZs have been subdivided into 164 subzones. The subdirided zones make up an area generally defined as follows: Eastern Boundary: 1-494 Northern Boimdary: Trunk Highway 55 Western Boundary: Hennepin County Line, extended south to CSAH 15 Southern Boundary: CSAH 15, Lake Minnetonka. McGinty Road ICSAH 16) Population and household totals for the subzones will be estimated using 1990 Census block information (subzone boundaries follow census block boundaries), to subdivide the regional TAZ totals. The division of TAZ employment information into the subzones will be based on field observation and census-defined land area. Socioeconomic totals for 1994 and forecasts for 2015 will be based on the Councils approved 1994 and 2015 TAZ forecasts for population, households, and emplo>Tr.ent. Figures 1 and 2 show the forecasts, by city, for population and households. Note that some portions of Orono lie outside the detailed area and therefore the totals underestimate Orono population and households. kro lj7624rr Figure 1: Population Growth In TH 12 Corridor Cities7000 GOOD ■1990 □1994 ■2015 Long take Orono Medina Way2ata City Maple Plain Indopendance Page 3 3000 2500 I III L5- S 1500 Ww oX m:i •II 0 -f Figure 2: Households in TH 12 Corridor Cities * 1* ‘ I Long Lake Orono Medina Wayzata City Maple Plain Independance Page 4 ■ill iiH SEE OVERSIZED DOCUMEnT!! I I ---»•—■—-><-V r L..7 -/ ) / ■ ^ ............~.~,..............WATERTOWN P V . . V7 :l:kJ PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES OF OUTLOT A. COUNTRYSIDE MANOR 2ND ADDITION, & TRACT A. R. L. S. NO. 1089 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ’ara DICKEY PARCEL y y yr f-nUifc I u. \jti> COFFIN k GRONBERG, iNC.PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES OF OUTLOT A. COUNTRYSIDE MANOR 2ND ADDITION. & TRACT A. R. L. S. NO. 1089 ____________HENNEPIN COUNTY.MINNESOTA ' SEE OVERSIZED DOCUMEI1T!! .*>5, f 11'-ol{, 111 tt) OLD I I � .. ' ,. •1 .. '· •••••• i., ' . L J CRYSTAL • -BAY· . . -¢, com� & GRO!\BERG INC ROAD /' (fl• I _,,.;. /1 I (, .1 ,,1 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES IN AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 230 HE�'.·JEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA 4 ��•. �[L ;;;;. : ..... ······ .,, •• I• ,., ... •, ��w. �uo, hd ,._ -� ���i;;:,;;;:;:�L.:' SILT FENCE "!:T�IL ·.COFFIN PARCEL PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES IN AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 230 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA I 100 /0