Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-10-1994 Council Packetrni \< ii' ‘-fJ ¥ 4.s t ^ 4<ir\ »?V' ^ ^ r'‘ ■ ^ V r #%■ •« I ' ^ #.4'- 1 . > . ? . .4 ' * Jy; •"••4J. ^‘\< *• *f V ♦ ||Ry WilsonJiHiBSo 04 (1524E) ^ ^ Fite Pocket ^ x'*’’-;^ ^ Red Hope , JR. i; 1 *■ •' . ^ *»nii?>-1.• » . ■V f 4 I "I w f.i > -I. ^ - ■r: ■!.•'■ r'5^ .:• •' v4^\:.! ■ (^•'T- »> XA U mD€m •*■ "•? 'er*« ^ - • ■ • ■ * • '» - - % -if ! '*> f. -rx t VLx. - *^^(ik ^'I'-.- - •.'!?■ i»4w^ v*’’’'^-)% ‘ ^ ► . I, 4>: 'UA. 'v3idP' ■%“x’s;----x!St^—-n_: - V '* *^.^ .^.. -n’ \ '^i .j.j- ' '* . .# PLAimZNO COMNISSION CODNCZX. PPBLIC ATTKHDAHCB mirmo date ^ - i o - U PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. kNE (plmmmm print)ADDRESS PRESQIT FOR (from agonda) NAME OR NUMBER 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. -oD Afl'i £ —Av. • AGDJDX FOR COUNCIL MEITING SIT FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1994, 7:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be .routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regardina each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL * 1. CONSENT AGENDA 2. Presentation by AAA - Pedestrian Safety Award^^"5t< 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Special Meeting of December 13, 1993 * 4. Regular Meeting of December 13, 1993 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS % PUBLIC COMMmrrS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ** APPLICANTS **Immediately after the Council has reviewed your application please sign the three (3) ori«jinal resolutions at the Recorder's desk. Applicants need not execute resolutions for subdivisions, vacations and denials 5. #1778/#1779 Andrew Goetten, 1385 Fox Street - Final Subdivision. Approval - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 6. Park Commission Liaison Schedule ENGINEER REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 7. Long Lake Water Quality Public Information Committee ^8. Park Commission Reappointments 9. 1994 Appointments - Resolution *10. Annual Purchase of New Squad Cars *11. Vehicle Purchase - Public Works Department *12. Vehicle Replacement - B\. ilding and Zoning Department *13. Sewer/Water Rate Adjustment - Ordinance Amendment *14. Tax Forfeit Property Update 15. Schedule Public Hearing Date for CDBG Funas *16. Donation to Police Department from Long Lake Bank (*17) LICENSES (*18) BILLS AGKHDA FOR COUNCIL MllTING SST FOR MONDAY. JANUARY 10, 1994, 7i30 P.M. ORQMO COUNCIL CRANBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA UPC(»fIMO ISSUES AKD EVENTS 01/06 - Park Commission 7:15 p.ra. Ol/lO - Council meeting 7:30 p.m. 01/17 - Holiday - Martin Luther King Day Observed 01/18 - Planning Commission - 7:00 p.m. 01/19 - Representative Todd VanDellen To%ra Meeting - Council Chambers 7-9:00 p.m. 01/24 - Council meeting 7:30 p.m. 01/25 - Highway 12 Joint Mediation meeting 4:&0 p.m. 01/28 - Open House at City of Spring Park honor of Pat Osmonson I • MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARIMi FOR THE I9W BIT)GET AND TAX LEVY cm OF OR(XNO HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 —J % (#1) ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present; Ma^r Callahan, Councilmembers J. Diann Goetten arx* Gabriel Jabbour. Cod^^.ember^pi and Kelley were absent. The tollowutg represented staff; City Adminisir^k RdH Finance Directw Thomas Kuchn, Public \Vorks Director John Gerhardson.^^d Barbara Anderson. Mayor Callahan called the (net ting to order at 7:18 p.m!^j T V (#2) ADOPTION OF THE 1994 AxNNUAL BUDGET RESOLUTION Moorse briefly reviewed the resolution adopting the 1994 budget. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt the 1994 Annual Budget RcsoJution No. 3368 as submitted. Ayes 3. nays 0. Moorse distributed a copy of the Debt Service Budget to tlic Council. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution No. 3369, the Debt Service Budget, as submitted. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#3) ADOPTION OF THE 1994 TAX LEVY RESOLUTION It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No. 3367, the Final 1993 Tax Levy Collectible in 1994, as submitted. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#4) ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:24 p.ni. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk ROLL MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER I?, 1W3 ^/ The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Callahan, Councilmcmbcrs J. Diann Goetten. and Gabriel Jabbour. JoEllen at ^ 8:00 p.m. and Charles Kelley arrived at 8:45 p.m. The following represented sQRj^ity Administrator Ron Moorsc, Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, AsSstant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Public Works Director John Gerhardson. City Engineer Glenn Cook, and Recorder Barbara Anderson. City Attorney Kevin Staunton arrived at 7:40 p.m. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. (#1) CONSENT AGENDA Jabbour requested that Items #5. #7, #9. #10, #14. #15. #16. #17, #18, #19. #20, #21, #22, and #23 be added to the Consent Agenda. Mayor Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 3, nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (•#2) REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1993 It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten to approve the Minutes of the November 22, 1993 City Council Meeting as submitted. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•#3) TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING OF DECEMBER 1. 1993 Jabbour noted that Mayor Callahan should be listed as Chair, and moved that be changed. Goetten seconded. Ayes 3, nays 0. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, secor ’ed by Goetten to approve the Minutes of the December 1, 1993 Truth in Taxation Public Hearing as corrected. Ayes 3, nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS No one was present representing the Park Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Dale Lindquist. Representative There were no Planning Commission Comments PUBUC COMMENT There were no public comments. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 (#4) #1850 JAMES SPINNER, 940 NORTH ARM DRIVT - VARUNCE Mabusth gave the staff report and reviewed the amer revised plan. hardcover facts as submitted on the Mr. Herstein, representing the applicant, was present and inquired what it would take to get the variance approved. Lindquist reviewed the Planning Commission’s discussion of this item, and stated that the Commission believed there was an excessive amount of hardcover on the site, and that it wou^d need to be reduced to be ntore in compliance with the ordinance requirements. Cioetten commented she was opposed to additional hardcover and she did not support the variance. Jabdour concurred with Goetten because the size of the house was more than the lot area would allow and still remain within the ordinar*ce standards. He did not support the variance. Mayor Callahan asked if the petitioner would remove some of the hardcover on the property aid Mr. Herstein responded that he believed Mr. Spinner would be willing to remove some of it. Discus'i^n ensued about the difference between structural and non-structural hardcover. Mayor Callahan commented that if the concrete were removed the Council would be willing to review the application again. Jabbour commented that he had attended the Planning Commission meeting and heard their discussion and he did not believe the applicant had gene tar enough to meet the criteria, and he did not support the variance. Goetten stated she concurred with the Planning Commission recommendation for denial. Mayor Callahan stated that he agreed, and while a tull Council might give a different vote, he did tK)t support granting the variance. He reiterated that he felt more of the concrete should be removed, and recommended that the item be continued until a full Council was present. It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to continue #1850 variance tor James Spinner at 940 North Arm Drive until the next City Council meeting. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•#5) #1860 ZELMA MCKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 3370 It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to approve Resolution No. 3370 approving #1860 Conditional Use Permit for Zelma McKinney at 3599 Livingston Avenue. Ayes 3, nays 0. J MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 13,1993 (#6) #1874 GARY DESANTIS/SAILORS WORLD, 1955 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3371 Gaffron revKwed the staff report, and noted that staff and Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance request. Gary DeSantis stated he hi»d invited the CouiKilmcmbers to come out and look at the site and noted that he was concern^ about being able to maintain the site as he would like to, and keep it neat without the storage module. He requested he be allowed to install the screening on the north and west sides of the module. Councilmember Hurr arrived at 8;00 p.m. Gtxtten stated she luul visited the site. Jabbour inqui*ed what the module would be used to store and Mr. DeSantis responded that it would be used to store seasonal equipment, and would be utilized year around. A list of the items that would be stored was included in the Council packet. Jabbour moved, Hurr secomled, to adopt Resolution No. 3371 approving #1874 Variance for Gary DeSantis/Sailor’s World located at 1955 Shoreline Drive subject to the following conditions: 1, The applicant shall combine the two lots into a single parcel. T* 3. The Council retains the right to revisit the variance request. The exterior of the storage module shall be painted the same color as the principal structure. 4. The applicant shall maintain a parking agreement with the Art Center. Ayes 4. nays 0. Mayor Callahan commented that he felt the storage module should have been applied for when the main building was done. Mr. DeSantis agreed, but noted that they will maintain the structure and not allow it to fall into disrepair. (*#7) #1887 RODNEY J. BATZLAFF, 1115 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - RENEWAL VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3372 It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No. 3372 approving the variance renewal #1887 for Rodney J. Batzlaff at 1115 Brown Road South. A*cs 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 (#8) #18S0 CRAIG HERTZENBERG, 115 SMITH AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3373 The amended variance requeM was reviewed by Mabusth. The petitioDer was pr«eDt and had no additional comments. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No. 3373 approving variance #1880 for Craig Hertzenberg at 115 Smith Avenue. Ayes 4, nays 0. (♦#9) #1891 BRIAN EHALT/DON JARNES, 140 LEAF STREET - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 3374 It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten to adopt Resolution No. 3374 approving variances #1891 for Brian Ehalt and Don James at 140 Leaf Street. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*10) #1892 BRUCE KEHRING, 4415 FOREST LAKE LANDING - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3375 It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No. 3376 ^ approving variance #1892 for Bruce Kehring at 4415 Forest Lake Landing. Ayes 4. nays 0. (#11) 1340 BALDUR PARK - SEWER CONNECTION Gaffron gave the staff report. Mayor Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to direct staff to proceed to meet with Mr. Franklin and Mr. Mess to determine how they wish to proceed. (#12) FLAG LOT ORDINANCE ADOPTION ORDINANCE NO. 122, 2ND SERIES Gaffron reviewed the staff report and stated that staff recommended adoption of the flag lot ordinance. Mayor Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded to adopt Ordinance No. 122, 2nd Series, the Flag Lot Ordinance, as presented by staff. Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#13) B-2 STATUS REPORT (INFORMATION ONLY) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CrH' COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 MAVOR/COUNCIL REPORT A. LMCD BUDGET REQUEST Mayor Callahan stated that the LMCD Budget repon stated that the City has not paid their voluntary contribution to the LMCD milfoil tund or the LMCD assessment. He stated now that they know the milfoil contribution is vx>luntary, he suggested that it not be paid for the 1994 year, and the back payments until 1992 should be refunded to the City. He believed that they should deduct the amount of the dues which may be owed for 1993 and 1994, and refund the remaining amount. Mayor Callahan moved. Jabbour seconded, to not continiK the remainder of 1993 or all of 1994 to participate in the milfoil project and request that the LMCD return the 1992 payment and the 1993 portion, deducting the amount the City may owe for dues. Discussion ensued regarding the LMCD request for contributions to harvest milfoil. Jabbour stated he would like to see all the payments made to LMCD for milfoil harvesting be returned back to 1990. Goe«en moved to amend the motion to request return of the payments since 1990; Maycw Callahan accepted the amendment. Hurr commented that she would like to see some figures before making the decision to retain the dues. Discussion ensued regarding application of the contribution funds against the amount of dues owed to the LMCD. Moorse stated he would obtain the figures for the Council. Mayor Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to request the LMCD to return all payments since 1990 deducting any amount owed for 1993 and the first quarter of 1994 dues. Ayes 4 nays 0. B. LEGAL SERVICES BOILING Mayor Callahan recommended that payment be made equalling one-half the amount of the invoice. Mayor Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, that City Administrator Ron Moorse be directed to pay one-half the amount of the invoice. Ayes 4, nays 0. Jabbour asked that the Council be kept involved in monitoring the LMCD as they have been in the past. He also felt that the Council should be aware that the LMCD and the Hennepin County Sheriff s Department were not on the best of terms, which could impact their effectiveness within the community. He requested that Mayor Callahan write a letter summarizing the City’s concern about how to manage the lake, and requested that priority be given to enforcement for BWl, water patrol, etc. and not spend a lot of time attending unnecessary meetings. He also felt that they should let the Sheriff know that they are doing a good job and noted that they would be on television on Re.'-' ue 911 on December 14th. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 Mayor Callahan coTOuircd with that idea, and noted that if Jabbour would draft a letter, Iw would greatly appreciate it. He also requested that Jabbour continue to keep track of the LMCD and keep the Council informed. ENGINEER REPORT (•14) PAY REQUEST 9% - STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER PRQIECT Mayor Callahan moved, (joetten seconded, for approval of Pay Request #8 for Stubbs Bay Sanitary Sewer Project to Progressive Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $113,192.88. Ayes 3, nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (•#15) TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY Mayor Callahan moved, Goenen seconded, to authorize staff to obtain advice from a park/land use planning consultant regarding the use of the property for park land with the cost not to exceed $500.00. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•#16) STEPHEN WECKMAN - SALARY ADJUSTMENT MaycM" Callahan moved, (joetten seconded, to increase Stephen Weekman s salary to Step 4 effecti' e January 1, 1994. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•#17) 1994 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS Mayor Callahan moved, Goenen seconded, to adopt the 1994 schedule of meetings as proposed. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•#18) SEWER AND WATER RATE UPDATE Mayor Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to accept the Sewer and Water Rate Update presented by staff. Ayes 3, nays 0. (*#19) 1994 FEE SCHEDULE Mayor Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the proposed 1994 Fee Schedule and adopt the Summary Fee Ordinance. Ayes 3, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY’ COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 (•#20) AUTHORIZATION TO DISBLTtSE CITY FLTSDS FOR CLAIMS RECEIVED Moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to authorize the City Treasurer to disourse City funds in payment of claims received for the December 27th Council meeting, which has been cancelled and that such paid claims are to be presented at the January 10, 1994 regular Council meeting for formal approval. Ayes 3, nays 0. (•#21) 1993 INTERFUND TRANSFERS AND LOAN PAYMENTS MovtJ by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, that the interfund operating transfers, loan paynv -is and special assessment payments on City property be approved as presented, effective December 31, 1993. Ayes 3. nays 0. (•#22) 1994 COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 3376 Mayor Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to approve the 1994 non-union wage and insurance adjustments as indicated in the staff report, and to adopt Resolution No. 3376 establishing salaries for 1994. Ayes 3. nays 0. (•#23) WORKER COMPENSATION INSLTIANCE Moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to approve the 1994 Application for Coverage under the LMCIT Self-Insured Workers’ Compensation Plan and award the 1994 worker compensation insurance to the LMCIT for the initial net premium of ^37,354, effective January 1, 1994. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#24) LASHER LANDING PUBLIC ACCESS Moorse reviewed the staff report and noted that staff recommended installing two locked gates with keys available at City Hall. He believed a sign on the gates telling people where keys could be obtained would provide some resolution to the problems. Hurr inquired how many keys would be made and would the police have keys to allow them access. Moorse responded that was a possibility; however, staff would contact those people who have been using the access to inform them of the change. Hurr commented that there may be others who want to use the access, who are unknown to the City. John Jerome stated that they believe that in the City’s review of the ownership of the property there are some statutes that were overlooked. He stated he has a warranty deed in which a title company says this is not City property. Mayor Callahan noted that this wm discussed last spring and the City Council was not going to vacate the property. He believed what staff proposed wos acceptable, but was concerned about the signage on the gates. Charles Kelley arrived at 8:45 p.m. NfEWTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 024) LASHER LANDING PUBLIC ACCESS - CONTINUED Jabbour commented that he fell it was -mportani to retain the fire access and he did not want to vacate the easement. Mr. Jerome agreed that it was important to retain the fire lane, jabbour commented that if it ts determined that the City does not own it, then it can be condemned. Craig Lundel! said that they would prefer not to have a large sign that advertised the access, although he concurred that the idea of retaining the fire road was a good one. Discussion ensued regarding the type of sign and how it would be installed. Hurt stated she fell a small sign for notification to call a number would be the best, but did not want to have a large sign on the gate attracting attention. The consensus of the Council wras that a small sign with a notice to call the City hall number to gain access would be appropriate. Kelley noted that it the City is not involved then people wishing to gain access would go to the residences adjacent to the gates to get keys. Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to allow the gates to remain with the keys being issued to allow access to the public. She felt the padlocks should be placed on a chain to prevent their falling into the snow. The sign shall be no larger than 8" x 10 mounted on the gates notifying residents to contact the City to obtain keys. Ayes 5, nays 0. (/K25) SCHEDLXE REVIEW OF PROPOSALS FOR LEGAL SERVICES Mayor Callahan commented he felt the firm of Holmes and Graven had a conflict of interest because they represent the LMCD. Discussion ensued regarding how to set up the interview dates. It was noted that pricing was the reason for considering alternative representation, since the City has utilired the same firm for the past 17 years without any lack of services. Jabbour commented he felt the Council should consider this item dij'ing a work session. The remaining Councilmembers concurred. It was decided this item should be placed on the agenda for the January 4, 1994 work session scheduled to begin at 8:00 a.m. (#26) LICENSES Hurr requested this item be pulled from the Consent Agenda because she wanted to know why there was a kennel application for eleven dogs, and when did such a use require a conditional use permit. Moorse responded that this particular application had eleven dogs all kept in the basement of the home in kennels. Hurr requested staff to ensure that this was really the case, and fell a site visit was appropriate. Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded to approve the following licenses: 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 (#26) UCENSES - CONTINUED Residential Kennel License -Kenneth & Karen Rolland 4119 Oak Street Wilfried Hoyes &. H. Zohan 565 Hanlon Avenue Judy Spinner 940 North Arm Drive Off Sale 8l On Sale Non-Inioxicating Malt Liquor - Navarre Lanes Donald Seberven 3435 Shoreline Drive 027) BELLS It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 3, nays 0. (#28) EASEMENT ACQUISITION BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD Gerhardsoii reviewed the staff report and the amounts for the easements. Mayor (^Ilahan moved, Kelley seconded, for approval of the payments to Charles James and James Bailer for the permanent and temporary easements for the bridge replacement project on Old Crystal Bay Road Ayes 5, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to adjourn at 9:15 p.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. Edward J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk S' To: Mayor Callahan aiKl Orooo Councflmcmbcrs From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Admi^^atfk % % January 4, 1994 q #1779 Andrew Goetten. 1385 Fox Street - Final Plat Approva Date: Subject: Lid of Exhibits A • Final Plat Resolution B - Copy of Final Plat Drawings C - Assessor’s Fair Market Value Determination D - Preliminary Plat Aj^roval Resolution No. 3224 NOTE: As of this writing, applicant is nearing compictioa of all requirements of Resolution No. 3224. Howerer, the mylar copies of the plat have yet to be delivered and are still under review at the County. If the signed mylars are not delivered in time to be available for the January 10 meeting, this item will have to be tabled until January 24. The City Council adopted preliminary plat approval Resolution No. 3224 on January 11, 1993, as well as Resolution No. 3223 which granted a lot area variance for Lot 2 and non­ contiguous area credit for Lot 1. The plat drawings indicate compliance with the requirements of Resolution No. 3224, including: Dedication of 33’ of right-of-way for OroiK) Orchard Road. Dedication of right-of-way for Orono Lane. - Standard drainage and utility easements along interior and perimeter lot lines of Lots 1 and 2. Platting of the lakeshore parcel across County Road 15 as Outlet A. Applicants have executed and the City has approved a Special Lot Combination Resolution regarding the use of Outlet A in conjunction with Lot 1. Further, the wetlands on Lots 1 and 2 have been designated on the plat and will be protected by the standard Conservation and Flowage Easement. The City Assessor has placed the fair market value of Lot I, Block 1 (in conjunction with Outlet A) at $40,200, yielding a park dedication fee of 8% or $3,216 which has been paid. Applicant is taking issue with payment of additional City costs incurred with this project. Please refer to the memo in your information (blue) packet. Staff Recommendation As noted above, if the signed and executed mylars arc available for the January 10 Council meeting, staff recommends approval of the plat of "Blue Hill" for Andrew Goetten at 1385 Fox Street per the attached resolution. If the mylars are not available, approval will have to be delayed until the January 24 Council meeting. ,seconded by . to adopt Resolution No.PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by__ granting final approval for the plat of Blue Hill for Andrew Goetten at 1380 Fox Street Ayes,____Nays. A RESOLtTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF BLUE HILL FILE NO. 1779 \%11EREAS, tte City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing itmdcT tte laws of the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ororw has ^Kloptcd subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Andrew Goetten (hereinafter "the subdivider*); and WHEREAS, on January’ 11, 1993. the City Council approved Resolution No. 3224 granting preliminary approval for a plat at 1385 Fox Street; and WHEREAS, the portion of the property being subdivided is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot; and WHEREAS, the property contains a total of approximately 3.66 acres, of which 3.01 acres is contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of 33 ’ of right-ot-way for Orono Orchard Road, exclusive of wedands. and exclusive of the non-contiguous portion south of County Road 15, which portion is located in the LR-IA zoning district; and WHEREAS, the plat contains two lots. Lot 1 consisting of 1.78 dry contiguous acres plus 0.23 acres located south of County Road 15 for a toul of 2.01 acres and Lot 2 consisting of 1.23 dry contiguous acres. Lot 1 requires a variance to allow credit for non­ contiguous area. Lot 2 requires a lot area variance. These variances have been granted per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 3223 of the City Council; and WHEREAS, each of Lots 1 and 2 abuts a public roadway open to traffic, and each lot contains the required 200 ’ lot width requirement as measured at the 50 ’ front yard setback line; and Page 1 of 4 ■MUEREAS, Lol 2. containing an existing residence, is within the Metropolitan UrtMin Service Area (MUSA) and is provided with municipal sewer as part of the 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs Sewer Project. Lot 1. currently vacant, wiU not be serxed with municipal sewer, is outside the MUSA, and has been confirmed as havmg acceptable pnmary and alternate drainlield sites; and WHEREAS, a City designated wetland occurs within the property at two locations along the southeast border of the property. A Flo.age and Conservation Easement has been granted to protect these WTllands; and WTIEREAS. 33' of right-of-way for Orono Orchard Road has been dedicated within the plat. Additionally, a triangular portion of land has been dedicated on the plat as right- of-way for Orono Lane, adjacent to Outlet A; and WHEREAS, no additional right-of-way is required to be dedicated for Fox Street, and no upgrade of the existing Fox Street roadway is required as part of the subdivision; and WHEREAS, it is the City ’s intent that Lot 2 shall continue to gain access from Fox Street, and that Lot I shall be allow^ access either on Fox Street or Orono Orchard Road, but not from both roadways; and WHEREAS, it is the City ’s intent that Outlet A shall be maintained in common ownership with Lot 1 as residential lake access for Lot 1 . subject to the Special Lot Combination .Agreement which has been executed by the City and the subdivider and which will be filed on the Chain of Title of Lot 1 and Outlet A; and WHEREAS, Lot I has been demonstrated to contain suitable primary and alternate drainfield sites to serve a proposed single family residence, which can be constnicicdl on Lot 1 without the need for additional variances, and WHEREAS, the subcivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including; 1. Completion of the requirements of Resolution No. 3224. 2. Dedication on the plat of rights-of-way for Orono Orchard Road and Orono Lane. Page 2 of 4 3. 4. 5. 6. Dedication to the City of a Flowagc and Consenation Easement providing for limitatioos on the use of wetlands described therein and shown on the plat as "draiiage easements". Execution of a Special Lot Combination Agreement with regard to the use of Outlet A in conjunction with Lot 1. Payment to the City of final plat legal review and filing fees of $200 00. Payment to the City of a Park Eiedication Fee in the amount of $3,216.00. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Blue Hill, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. 3. 4. Lot I shall be granted access on either Fox Street or Orono Orchard Road (but not on both roacL) at a location to be approved by the Public Works Department. Lot 2 shall continue to gain access via Fox Street. 2. The wetlands located in Lots 1 and 2 shall be subject to a Flowage and Conservation Easement, which shall be filed in the Chain of Title of said lots. Outlot A shall be maintained in common with Lot 1 as residential lake access for Lot 1. subject to the Special Lot Combination Agreement executed by the subdivider and the City, which agreement shall be filed in the Chain of title of both Lot 1 and Outlot A. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office on or before July 10, 1994 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the Conservation and Flowage Easement and Special Lot Combination Agreement documents as noted above. Page 3 of 4 The ^)provil gnuited by Ais resolution ^lall expire if the plat has not been filed by tht date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the Cii.y of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this lOth day of January, 1994. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of January. 1994 by Edward J. Callahan and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of die City of Orono, a Minnesou municipal corporation atal said instrument was executed on belialf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 o CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE OTT COUNCIL NO. 3224__________ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 1385 FOX STREET - FILE NO. 1779 WHEREAS, Andrew J. Goetten, on October 23. 1992 *?he formal subdivision application with the City for approval of wh two lot residential plat of property legally described as. That part of Lot 3. Section 2, Township 117 Nortn, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner o ^ aforesaid and running thence =,ast feet to v.h Northerly line or side of right or way of Che Minnetonka Branch of the Great Northern Railway, thence Southwescerly along the Northerly of°^' r'oht of way, 827.05 feet to the West line of ^ot 3 aforesaid; thence North 423.1 feet to place of beginning, the boundaries of which tract of land have been marked by three judicial landmarks placed at the most Easterly cSraer o£ said tract o£ land at a point in the Southwesterly line and at a point in the North line wnere said lines arc intersected respectively by a parallel to and 33 feet east of the West line of said lot. «-Viar of the West 33 feet of Lot 3, Section 2, ?cSSsn!rilVNorthr Range 23 West of the ,5th Principal M^r'dian Iving Southerly of County Roaa No. 7, Che bo^daries ‘of which tract of land nave been marked by four judicial landmarks placed at the Northwest corne. in^the Northeast corner, respectively of land, and at a point in the N^rthSlste-lyfeet South along said line from said Nortnweste^iy comer, and in the East line thereof at a point 275.4 feet siuth of the Northeast comer thereof. (hereinafter "the property"); and Page 1 of 6 fveMM OittI CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3224 WHEREAS f after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.38 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 16, 1992, at which time ail persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on Deceiver 14, 1992, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Andrew J. Goetten, noting the following findings of fact: 1 The portion of the property proposed for subdivision is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguo dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 3.66 acres of which 3.01 acres is contiguous dry buildable exclusive of 33 feet of right-of-way for Orono Orchard Road, wetlands, and the non-contiguous portions south of County Road 15. ■i The orcDOsed plat contains two lots, Lot 1 consisting of I'lB dry con acres plus 0.23 acres located south of ciuLv Lad 15 for a total of 2.01 acres and Lot 2 consisting County R OUS acres. Lot 1 requires a variance to allow credit for Son-contiguous area. Lot 2 re<^ires a lot ar-ea variance These variances have been granted per the bindings anfcondS^ of Resolution No. 3223 of the City Council. 4 Each of Lots 1 and 2 abuts a public roadway open to traffic^and each lot contains the required 200 lot width re^?«;eL al measured at the rear of the 50' front yard setback line. 5 Lot 2, containing an existing residence, is "^fthin the Mlrmnolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is provided with Metropolitan uroan 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs Sewer Project. Lot 1, currently vacant, will not beProjecr. outside the MUSA, and has been confirmed :rhai!ng alcepUwe primary and alternate drainfield sites. Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO._i££i_ 6 A CiCY desicnated wetland occurs within the property a- ®* , bo-^de'- of the orooerty. Atwo location. over theseconser'/ation and flowage easement, wxxj. wetlands. 7 33' of riaht-of-wav for Orono Orchard Road ledicaLd within- the plat'. A small ^iangular portion o£ land Street” up«ale o^^fhV^I^L.- ?ox s\%etf ifadfay wu/b^ required as part of this subdivision. 9. ’ Lot 2 shall continue to gair Acc.es oro^c J,oh ‘ke,^c^%*.i^rntt7^o-m ”hoI.- ^^-cation to he approved by the Public Works Department. a. • w, r-,f oT-nnertv located south of County Road iS10. The as Outlot A, and shall be ?:^!LA°o’n^r:^^'-Te“d o^ie^^chf^^^ Title o£ Lot 1 and Outlot A. 11. Lot 1 has been seal's \“«nosed'’Ilng^J famil%^“”^iVnct'“such‘a residence can be constructed on Lot 1 witLu^ the need for additional variances. _ _nv TT resolved, that based upon one or NOW, Che City Council of the City of more of the plat for Andrew J. Goetten at Orono hereby dated 10-29-92, revised 11-5-92, oy 1385 Fox Street per ®^^_X.jecc to the following conditions:Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., suo^ecc 1. variances «ill , f p«*‘ the "f°i^ndings “nd coSons ofTesolution No. 3223 of the City Council. Page 3 of S o ^ o,,CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3224_____ 2. Lot 1 shall be granted access to be Crono orchard Read (but not on both roads) at a loca.^c.. ^o ce accreved cv th^ Works D6p3.rtrr*enc. 3. A dedicaciir. of 33' richo-ef-way for Orc-.io Orohard Road shall be indicated on the plat crawrngs. 4 A triancular portion of Orono Lane shall be dedicated for Crono Lane right-cf-way on the plat drawi.ngs. - A-n'-'-a-- shall execute a Conser-.-ation and we-^ards located in Lets 1 and 2. and such eiJeiekt shVlf'be shown on the plat arawings as "drainage easements". 5. Standard drainage and utility easenents shall be granted a'e.,— ---ttw-cr and cerimeter lot xines. GLeteW4«^ ^ / .mj-Q subdivision shail be suojec ,c the standard park , ~h. ao-ess oarcel located south of County Road IS ano Orono *-a..e s.^a oe^p -esidential lake access T.atntatned '--io'a Soecial Lot Combtnation resolution to brfiled'in^e Chain of Title of both Lot 1 and Outlet A. c C'tv shall .have t.he judicial landmark at t.he east e.nd of the**pcorrect .ccacicn. , ,, - s e» n« f-'na'' submittals must be submitted to T.he fo^owtrg ^ weeks prior to t.he regularly scheduled plat drawi.ngs in t.he form of two (2) mylar copies -i; p7 «nv reduced to 1" - 200'. Drawing to include: A Lot lines platted per preliminary su^ey by Coffin lid G^olberg, Ino. dated 10-29-92, revised 11-5-92. = n«-’ra‘-cn of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all‘perimeter property lines and 5' eacn siae of internal property lrr.es. Page 4 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLimON or THE CITY COUNCIL NO 3224_ _ _ _ C. Designation of the wetlands in Lots 1 and 2 as a drainage easeaent on the plat drawings. 2. Legal document? required; A Title ooinicn addressed to the City. All owners^ Sor-.g«e hliders or other, with indicated therein shall sign the plat and all othe^ documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C signed and executed Conservation and Flowage Easement document; blaI^Jc area requiring description may be filled out as follows: "Over the drainage easements as shown on the plat of ( plat name ) ". D Special Lot Combination resolution for Lot 1 and ouclor A (City to draft) . CjTy ff-S.W.W Fees to be paid; Total due; ■ 0°*. > A. Legal review and filing fees « $200.00 01 c£H :oo.oo B. *Park Commission shall accept park^fee lands. The City Assessor has been askea to detei7na.rte ww/Ti/Fw fair market value of the undeveloped lands within the Subdivision so that a park dedication fee can be determined. Applicant will be advisea Erickson, the City Assessor, has submitted his *.indings. ,rr,%vs:, at sv^s„°ir,t Page 5 of 6 CITY OF GW FmHCE OFFICE „ 123B40000QO ^ ^ # 12 PRK 3216.00 CHECK n. 3216.00 receipt -thahk H293500 COOl ROl 715:07 V 12/23/93 hmim CITY of ORONO WBSni imow OF THE CTTY COUNCIL 3224 _________ I / STATE OF MINITESCTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foreaoinc instrument was acknowledged before raa on -hi. li-h day o£ 1993. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. ‘ ^«c.hy M Hal'in 4yor t City clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on benalf of Che City. hennep «n county My J. li Notary Public Page 6 of ^ TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Mooise, City Administfiior Dorcfthy Hillin, City Clert January 4. 1994 SUBJECT: Park Commission Liaison Schedule ^SoV The foBowing ii a proposed schedule for Council attendance at the monthly Park Commission meetings. Febniaiy 7ih March 7th April 4th May 3rd June 7th July 5th August 2nd September 6th October 4th November 7ih Do:ember 5th Mayor Callahan Ccwncilmembcr Gocnen Councilnombcr JabbtHir Councilmcmber Hurr Councilmember Kelley Mayor Callahan Councilmember Goetten CouncilnKmbcr Jat^Kxir Councilmember Hurr Councilmember Kelley Mavor Callahan Mayor and City CouncilRon Moorse, City Administrator January 6, 1994 Long Lake Mater Quality Public Information C CtA I have attached information concerning the Long Lake water quality project currently being undertaken by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and a letter from the MCWD requesting a City representative on a public information committee as part of the water quality project. The representative could be a Councilmember, a staff person or an interested citizen. MINNEHAHA CREEK watershed district > • 14600 liinmtonJu Bouttvard MtnnDloRkA, Minfissoia 55345-1597 (ttS) m43» Im: <i1i) USAM4 TAATOS ENi* • Sorn SOAKiOfWUUCtRt: TtawiMwM. Ji..Prm»C Wh Swlm* carte! S »**(!**i • a SW j ■ t * •••*' ••*** • '/4«.« si-sx'-'rri’SS.'nM'S!;!.!.... » • • • Dscsmbsr 17. 1993 Mr. Fion Moorss, Adminittrator Cty or Orono PO Box M Orono. MN 66323406B Osar Ron; I would nk« to thsntr you for attsnding a maaOng wth fha District to discuss ttta Long Laka Oaanwaiar Partnarship prcfact. Our discussions damortstratad thM thara Is soma ds4nEa Intarast In working cooparativaty to protact Long Laks from furthw watw quality degradation. As wa dlscussad at tha maatlng. tha District has comptstad a Diagnostic snd FsasibOlty Study as waif ii a draft impiamantation plan for Long Laka. The plan idantiflas various bast managamant practica aitarnativas and watar quality banafits which on CK^y occur succasdulty If there Is coordination and partic'patton at tha local lavM. Wa ancouraga you to eonsidar daiignatlr>g city rapraaantatK«a to serve on a Public Informatton Committaa wrhich will asaist in the development of public eduction and iaka monitoring programa aa wall aa idantify watar quality and fish mantgemani goats for Long Lika. A efty raprasantativa could ba you. a council mambar, city staff parson, or kttarastad cRIian. Wa would graatty appraclata your rasoonsa on the appoinimant of a repressntsilvs by January 15, 1994, tinea wa anticipata that tha first eommittas mssting wl bs schsduled during ths baginning of Fabruary. I hava andosad informational matarM which wM hopafuity provida you with a general overview c! the District's current lake managamant actlvRiss. Thank you for your support If you have any questions or commanta piaaaa contact our District Administrator. Ellen Sor^s. at 939^21. Sincerely. Martha S. Hartflai District Manager Enclosure Section DI Implementation Plan The recommerHlcd implcmcntadon pUfl for the improvemeni of water quality of Long Lake is (Ml the preceding evaluati<Hi of administrative, non-structuial, and structural BMPs. As discusKd earlier, achieving the impicmcntadon plan objectives will require two sedimentation basins, an ^ration system, along with administrative and non-structural BMPs (urtjar fertilizer management, yard and livestock waste management, and agricultural soil conservation practices). Additionally, the plan uicorporates street cleaning, fishery management, monitoring, and future watersted development guidelines. The implementation plan first provides a more detailoi description of the plan elements, then estimates overall project effectiveness, and finally provides the project schedule and financial plan. A. PLAN ELEMENTS The Long Lake Improvement Project has been dividai into seven project elements. These are: 1. Public Informaiion Prognm Public Infonnatloa CoamiOee . Public Infonnatioo Profnm Impknientaidoa 2. Street aeaninf 3. Sedimenation Basins County ixwl 6 Basin Dccr Hill Road 4. Aeradon System 5. Fishery Manafcincnt 6. Post-Implementation Monitoring 7. Future Watershed Development The locations of structural elements (3 and 4 above) are provided in Figure 6. Following is a discussion of each element: 1. Public Information To encourage public support and involvement, an effective public information program is needed and will be an important element of this project. The major emphases of this element will be urban fertilizer and yard waste management, livestock waste management, and agricultural soil conservation BMPs. This type of program is specifically identified in the District’s Water Management Plan. The public inforrnaticm profraxn will be implemented by a Public Infonnadcm Committee which will use the MPCA document, •Community Lnformaiioa and Oitreach fc» the Clean Water Partnership* (June 30, 1989) for juidana in the program. The Committee should consist of a: least nine members from the community. The MCWD will provide two represenutives from its Pnard of Nlanagen in addition to the District Engineer. A request wUl be made by the MCWD to etch of li e following entities to provide one represenative each: City of Long Lake City of Orwio City of Medina Minnooa Department of Namral Resources Hennepin Soil and V/ater Conservation District Minnesoa Pollution Control Agency The Committee, through meetings esery two months, win set goals, develop a long-term plan, and finally implement this plan in order to inform and educate the public on this project and what they can do to help improve the water quality of Long Lake. Some methods which might be considered in helping inform and educate the pubUc may be sending out project newsletters, supplying news releases to local newspapers, giving presentations to local groups/organizations, and possibly undertaking cable television programs. BasH on the results of the diagnostic study, it would appear that some of the most important topics to be covered in the Public Information Program are: Liv^tock Waste Management Agricultural Soil Conservation BMPs Residential Fertilizer Management Residential Yard Waste Management Individual Septic System Maintenance 29 In addition to the above, tfie Committee will caiduct public meetings concerning the project at appr o priate times. These meetings would eduote the public on techniques they can apply to reduce nutrient loadings and improve lake and watershed aesthetics. Other topics, such as fishery management, might be incorporated. The meetings would also update the public on how the project is proceeding and anewer quKtions they may have concerning the project or their possible involvement in it, As an element of the Public Informatiai Program, the costs associated with the Committee will be jqjproximately SI6,200 annually assuming nine member; mating six times annually; 10 hours per individual per mating, and S25/hour plus 25 percent fringe benefits and other direct costs (mailing, printing, travel, etc.). Implementation of the spaific activities recommended by the Committa will have separate costs. The annual cost csti.nated Ln Table 4 was $39,672 for year 1 of the program and $25,272 for each subsequent year. As discussed above, the spaific tasks to be incorporated into the implementadon of the Public Information Program will be determined by the Committa. 2, Street Cleaning As indicated in earlier sations, the City of Long Lake currently rents a strat swaping unit every spring. Subsequent cleaning is conducted on an "as-noded" basis. This plan element prioritizes areas within the City for strat cleaning. The high priority ireas (Figure 7) were selaied on the basis of slope and intensity of use. 3. S<»dtmentation Basins a. County R(ad 6 Basin The strojn monitored at site S-3 is Lhe major tributary to Long Lalce and concibutcs about 80 percent of the lake’s external phosphorus load. Monitoring indicated that le\els of phosphorus and sediments were relatively high at stream site S-3, where this stream passes under County Road 6 prior to discharging to the lake. A sedimentacon basin will be created at this site to reduce sediment and nutrient loadinp. The basin will be created in subwatershed LLC-7 just north of County Road 6 (Figure 6). Approximately 10.0 acres of land will be required to create the 8.0-acre basin, and some 174,000 cubic yards of soil will be removed to achieve an aveiage depth of 11.5 feet. Once created, the peripheral ara will be sodded to stabilize it and improve aesthetics. Indigenous wetland trees and shrubs will also be planted around the basin perimeter, b. Deer Hill Road Basin The stream monitored at site S-1 is one of the two major branches of the site S-3 5tream, and contributes more than 60 percent oi the laser’s phosphorus loading. Therefore, a sedimentation basin will be created on this stream near Deer Hill Road (Figure 6). Approximately 6.0 acres of land will be required to create this 4.0-acre, 10.0-foot deep basin, and 76,500 cubic yards of soil will be removed. F As in County Road 6 basin, the ana surrounding the sedimenation basin will be sodded to improve sabflity and aesthetics. Indigenous wetland trees and shrubs will also be planted along the basin’s perimeter. 4. Aeration System Two in-Iake hypolimnetic aeration units will be crated for Long Lake a: the locations indicated in Figure 6. An in-Iake aeration unit is shown conceptually in Figure 8. The system will incorporate a land-based air compressor which will supply air to the two in-lake units. Because Long Lake comprises two basins, while a primary goal is to reduce phosphorus release from anoxic sediments in both, the use of two aeration units was selected. This will increase the areal coverage of the system significantly and will ensure the aeration of the whole lake hypolimnion. addition, ferric chloride, as an iron source, will be supplied into the lake hypolimnion. ' his will further reduce the phosphorus concentraion and ensure high phosphorus retention efficiency. The aeration system will be operated yor-round to prevent anaerobic conditions in the lake during the summer and winter months, and thereby reduce the high sediment phosphorus loading. The ferric chloride, on the other hand, will be supplied into the over the seven- to eight-month open water season only. 5. Fishery Management One of the goals of the Long Lake project is to improve recrational fishery in the lake. The development of a fishery management plan which may include stocking of selected fish species is part of this project element. One of the most significant issues which must be addressed prior to developing a comprehensive fishery management program is the evaluation of the success of the other plan elements. Until the quality of Long Lake has improved significantly, it would seem unwi» to invest time and effort in the stocking of desirable fish spedcs. Therefore, the early elements of developing a fishery management program for the lake will be evaluating the successes of the other trcatmcit elements. It is currently planned that the DNR’s metropolitan area office would be the lead in this project dement- The early phases will involve DNR staff working with, and reviewing the results of, the other ele.ments of the program. This effort will culminate in the development of a comprehensive fishery management plan for the lake based on the results of the water quality improvements. 6. Post-Implementation Monitoring To evaluate the effectiveness of the Long Lake Improvement Project, a post-implcmenU"ion monitoring program will be conducted. This program will address the following primaiy issues: • Changes in lake water quality • Improvement of dissolved oxygen levels • Effectiveness of new detention basins The following monitoring plan is proposed. a. f jkg Monitoring Long T jkg is not currently included in the MPCA Citizen’s lake Monitoring Program. One of the tasks of the Public Information Committee will be to identify at least two individuals ijtterested in recording Secchi disc readings for Long Lake. T aVi» sampling will begin in the summer of 1994 and continue throughout the project. Samples will be collected monthly between May and September. In­ take nutrient dynamics within Long Lake will be identified with the two lake monitoring stations (Figure 9), which have already been established through the diagnostic portion of this study, and arc currently represented in the STORET database. At each site, water samples wiU be collected at the same three depths as in the earlier diagnostic study. All samples will be analyze for the following parameters: Total Phosphorus Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Chlorophyll-a (surface samples only) Secchi Disc Transparency pH Iron In addition, profiles for temperature, dissolved oxygen, and specific conductivity will be recorded at each site. b. Stream Monitoring Stream monitofir.g at two of the Ive stream monitoring sites identified in the diagnostic study will begin in the summer of 1994 and contintie throughout the projecL Automatic sampling, using Campbell Scientific CR-10 data loggers, will be used to measure stream tlows, temperature, and dissolved oxygen at hourly intervals. In additicxi, water sample will be collected automatically (at mid-Strom) during high runoff volumes, and analyzed for the following parameters: Total Phosphorus Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Total Suspended Solids The Strom sites to be monitored, S-1 and S-3, are shown in Figure 10. (Additional sites will also be monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of the County Road 6 and Deer Hill Road sedimentation basins, as discussed below.) Event-based monitoring will be conducted five times och year, reflecting snow melt, eaxiy spring, late spring, mid-summer, and late summer conditions, and will be analyzed for the parameters listed above.. c. Aerator System Monitoring Aeration system monitoring will begin in July 1995 on Long Lake to evaluate the effect of the aeration system on the lake. Dissolved oxygen profiles at three sites will be recorded on a monthly basis between July and September 1995. The monitoring stations for the DO profiles are 100, 200 and 500 feet from the aerators’ discharge point to the lake. 35 d. pHention Basins Monitorini Monitoring of the l»sins included in this pisi will be conducted to evaluate theii effectiveness at removing phosphorus and suspended solids. An evaluadoo of the rate of in-filling will alai be made. This information will be utilized in developing an operation and maintenance plan for the basins. Two basins will be included in this moniajring. These are: • County Road 6 Basin • Deer Hill Road Basin The inlets to these basin are already being monitored as str»m site S-l and stream site S*3. To allow for comparable results, tfie outlets to these basins will be monitored using the same technioues and schedule used in the stream monitoring. Removal effectiveness of the two basins will be estimated for six storm events (rainfall of 0.10 inches or greater) between March and September 1995. To evaluate the rate at which sediment is accumulating in each basin, a survey of basin depth contours will be made, and compared to as-built contours. This information will be utilized to assist in developing long-term maintenance schedules for the basins. e. Monitoring Costs The estimated costs for conducting the post-implementation monitoring are detailed in Table 7. Future Watershed Drretoproent Total urbanization of the Lonf Lake watenhed is anacipaled within the next two or tfuec decades. Increased runoff volume and nutrient loading axe expected as a result of this change in land use. This in turn will impaa the lake’s water qiality. To maintain the quality of the lake’s water within the normal limits, existing wetland xparsed over the watershed siujuld be preserved. In addition, storm water detention basins have to be introduced. These basins wUI provide adequate storage for storm water and will reduce the nutrients loading that will eventually enter the lake. The size of such detention basins is a function of the nutrients (mainly phosphorus) loading and the runoff, which in turn is a function of the drainage area (size and use.) For a given subwatershed, the runoff volume in acre-ft, R, cani be estimated using the rational method: R CiA where.C * Runoff Coefficient i ■■ Total Rainfall (ft) A I* Drainage Area (acres) The runoff coefficient, C, will change as ?. result of the change in the subwatershed land use (development). Therefore, the runoff volume will also change. The detention basin should be large enough so that it could store this increased volume of runoff. Considering 0.5 feet of total rainfall (100-ycar, 24-hour duration), the volume of the basm m acre-tt, V required to detain the increased volume of runoff, can be calculated as follows. 0.5 (Cg-C^A< where.C| ■■ Runoff coefficient for the developed subwatershed am Runoff coefficient for the undeveloped subwatershed A4 ■■ Area of the developed subwatershed The runoff coefficient is a funcaon of land use and ranges from 0.15 for open spaces, with flat slope and loose soil to 0.9 for commercial or industrial use with steep slope an^ tight soil. Chow tt al. (1988) lists runoff coefficients as a function of land use and su .1 return period. The detention basin volume should also be large enough to be ca|»ble of reducing the phosphcmis loading (due to urbaniradon) to the prcdcvelopment loading rates. Walker (1985) estimated the basin volume required to reduce the watershed phosphorus loading to the undevclopment level as a function of the watershed area. He suggested the basin volume in acre-ft, V, to be a fraction of the developed watershed arci in acres. This fraction ranges from 0.08 to 0.25. The higher range value corresponds to a single-cell basin while the lower range value corresponds to a five-cell basin. The larger volume calculated from the two above-mentioned criteria (runoff volume and nutrient loading) has to be used to counter the impacts of urbanization on the runoff volume and water quality. Required Permits. The permits required for the project elements are summarized below. Aeration: Sedimentation Basins: Chemical Treatment: DNR Permit DNR and ACOE Permit DNR Permit TO: FROM: DATS: SUBJECT! Mayor and City Council Ron Moorae, City Administrator January 6, 1994 Park Cowmiaaion Reappointments A ^ % %» Three Park Commission terms expired on December 31, 199,Ft These are the terms of; Richard Flint, Susan Wilson and Sherokee Use. All are eligible for reappointment in terms the number of terms they have served. Upon Council dii.ection staff will contact the three cotrmission members to determine their interest in serving an additionel term. TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and Ciiy Council Ron Moonc, City Administrator January 6, 1994 Uh SUBJECT: 1994 ARwintracnts A rcsohilion designating appointments tor 1994 is attached Several of the appointments require (■xpl^n^tion or clarific^ion The Paiit Commission Chair has been left blardc because the term of the preseitf Chair, Richard Flint, expired on December 31, 1993. Mr. Flint is eligible j'jjf yy-^pprtifjfment for an additional term on the Park Commission. The Civil Attorney has been left b lank b fcause we arc in the process of reviewing proposals for civil legal services. The North Tonka Crime Prevention appointments expire in May of each year. Barbara Peterson has indicated she is interested in continuing to serve as the City ’s representative on the Coalition. 1 A RESOLimON DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1994 BE IT RESOLVED, by ihe City Council of the Cit>' of Cn>no, Minnesota that the appointments and designations for tte year 1994 are as follows; appolntment /designation Acting Mayor Planning Commission Rep. to Couicil Park Commission Chair Reprcsentatis'e to Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Liaison AMM AMM Legislative Contact Lead Attorney (Civil) City Attorney Firm (Civil) Alternate Attorney Lead Prosecuting Attorney City Prosecuting Attorney Firm Lead Engineer City Engineering Firm Auditor Fiscal Agents Insurance Agent of Record Weed Inspector Assistant Weed Inspector Transportation Committee Emergency Preparedness Director Southwest Sanitary Sewer District Suburban Health Nursing Service West Hennepin Recycling Commission Mayor’s Association 1994 -J. Diami Ouefftn Alternate Ronald J. Moorse Ronald J. Moorse J. Diann Goetten William Soth, Dorsey & Whitney Laurel Hersey Citv of Minnetonka 0 Glenn Cook Bonestroo, Rosene, Andcrlik and Associates Malloy. Kamowski, Radosevich and Co.. P.A. Ehlers & Associates Duweyne P. Carlson Apple Valley Insurance Edward J. Callahan. Jr. John R. Gerhardson John R. Gerhardson Stephen X. Sullivan Ronald J. Moorse Ronald J. Moorse John R. Gerhardson Edward J. Callahan, Jr. • appointment /designation W94 Suburban Rate Authority West Tonka Senior Citizens Representative to Long Lak e Fire Dept Minnesota Police Rccmiting System West Hennepin Human Services- — * Planning Board (2 Plus Alternate) Building Code Board of Appeals Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization North Tonka Crime Prevention Highway 12 Appointments; Policy Committee Technical Committee Citizens Committee Housing and Redevelopment Authority John R. Gerh^rdson Ronald J. Moorsc (Alternate) Edward J. Callahan. Jr. Charles Kelley Stephen X. Sullivan Ronald J. Moorse (Alternate) Dale Woodbeck LaDean McWilliams Shirley Laue Steve Anderson, Mtka Fire Ins Tom Anderson, Hopkins Building Olficial Maureen Bellows, AIA Architect Jim Hanson, Builder Theodore Paulfranz, Edina Fire Chief Ronald J. Moorse Stephen X. Sullivan (Alternate) Stephen X. Sullivan (5/9/93) Barbara Peterson (5/9/93) Edward J. Callahan, Jr. J. Diann Goetten (Alternate) John R. Gerhardson Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelley George Johnson Eleanor Winston John Massopust (Alternate) Gabriel Jabbour. Chair Charles M. Kelley, Secretary J, Diann Goetten Edward J. Callahan, Jr. JoEllen Hurr APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Lake Minnetonka Cable Communicalkms Commission Lake Use Committee Official Newspaper Official Depositories/ Investment Vendors 1994 Timothy Pattrin •teEHctrHnn 3PB8®'Me. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Chair J. Diann Goetten, Vice Chair Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kellev Charles Schroeder JoEllen Hurr Jeanne A. Mabusth, Secretary The Laker and Pioneer Newspaper First National Banks of: The Lakes (Navarre) Wayzau Minneapjlis St. Paul Wayzata Bank &. Trust Company American Bank of St. Paul League of MN Cities - 4M Fund Smith Barney Harris Upham & Co. Inc. Mpis Norwest Bank Mirmeapolis TCF Bank FSB Piper Jaffray, Mpls Dain Bosworth, Iik., Mpls Prudential Securities. Inc., Mpls Pain Webber, Mpls Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc., Mpls Merrill Lynch, Mpls First USA Bank, Willmington, DE Connecticut National Bank, Hartford, CT Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular mating teld January 10, 1994. Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. HallLn, City Clerk RECAP OP 1993 LAKE HUmETOIfKA CABLE nnCATIORS CCXMISSION MEETING ATTEimAjiCE EXECOTTVE Barbara Brancel Jia Olds Tin Salazar Tin Pattrin Dennis Stanga Ann C. Thies Bob Anderson £3ZLL [S5IQH Dale Noe Robert Murphy David Stahr Jiaaie Wright Jan Gray James Hi11is Jin Hartfiel Scott Luse (Resigned) Linda Deal Bobbi Abdo Thomas Marklc David Thaler Mary Gessner (Resigned) Jo Ellen Hurr Andrew Weinzierl, Jr. Bob Gagne Harlyn Dill Carl Rosen Mark Brenenan Jerry Anderson Lesley Hughes-Seanans Susan Hines David Lindgren Nick Duff Sidney Wear Community Represented 1993 Meetings Shorewood Excelsior Ninnetrista Orono Deephaven Medina Tonka Bay Deephaven Excelsior Excelsior Greenwood Greenwood Greenwood Long Lake Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Beach Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Ninnetrista Orono St. Bonifacius Snorewood Spring Park Spring Park Spring Park Tonka Bay Tonka Bay Victoria Victoria Woodland Woodland 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 4 4 * 4 • 4 2 1 4 4 1 2 4 4 4 4 4 * 4 * 4 4 4 4 1993 Heetinqs _Attended 7 9 8 7 8 8 5 3 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 3 3 1 1 0 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 * Denotes Alternate (Attendance required only when city is not represented by a regular commissioner) V. pngcTCw $«etlaR 1. t^leaeionAopolnttipr!*. Ttm City Council o£ «2ic!x ihalX b« to two dircctsra. At least <nm o€ vbcBi shAll b« oC xSiMt oouncil «tl QthAC a qualified «ctar rMidLnq within that city. Ttm City CosicU of each aesbev* shall b« entitled to w^int at leas altactat* director. Nhen the ocask U c< a nenber ^points ItJ first b« din 60CSr it give nctioe of Lheic n^in^air.ta to the City AMniatratrx .of* d» City of tbete 3ey* Sctloe of i luocefncc director shall be qiven to the ^jecreriirx of the Canaisslon. That notioe shall inciada the noa and nailing of the ippoincee which ehall be deefosi to be the official naue end «9drcM of ttat appointee for the purpeae of giving ary notice nt^^ired under this agremnt. Derphaven Excel* (Of Loag Lake Minnetonka Beach Mlnnetrieia LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION M4 S«c«nrf • T.Oi Bmi 473 • Ea cehi** (4l2t474-SS3« •F«ii(41X>474-04» S3331-0473 JAM 3 Otono Si. BonifoLias Shorewood Spring Bark Tonka Bay Vlctsrifl llVinrflnnif Oeceaber 29, 1993 i>v. 1 . /• W -J|i . -.1! ,Ron Moorse City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway, Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55356 Dear Ron: Each Cable Comiaissioner, appointed by your city council, serves a term of one year on the Lake Minnetonka Cable Coiamunications Commission. The term for all current Cable Commissioners expires in January 1994. The Joint Powers Agreement in Article V, Section 1 (see attached), requires each city to submit written notice of their appointments or re-appointments for the upcoming year (please note the Joint Powers 8Ays that at least one of the t%io Cable Commissioners must be a member of the city council). This notice, directed to the Secretary of the Cable Commission, is required to include the current name, mailing address and telephone number of each appointee. 11 is to be received no later than January 31, 1994. As the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission has filed all necessary paperwork to once again regulate the basic cable rates, and also issued ’♦formal comylaints" with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Triax Cablevision's operations, the upcoming 1994 will be a busy year of challenge. If you have any questions, you can call Administrator, at 474-5539. Regards, LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ann C. Thies Secretary ACT/cl Enclosure cc: All Cable Commissioners Jim Daniels, our To* From: D«t« t Subject: Mayor Callahan and Orono City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator January 6, 1994 Police Sqfuad Replacement in 1994 (0 % The Police Department has nine vehicles. Generally three new cars aie purchased each yeai to replace three which are then sold at auction. The cars to be replaced are determined based on three factors: mileage, maintenance problems and age. For 1994 the Police Department has requested the replacement of two police squads. The cost of the two squads is $13,951 each. The squads to be replaced and their current and projected mileage are as follows: TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moortc, City Administraior John R. Gcrhardson, PuWk Works Director January 4, 1904 SUBJECT: Equipment Purchase Utility Vehicle w Currently the PubiK Works Department operates a 19»4 CMC 3/4 ton pickup for service and use in the sewer and water departments. The vehicle has in excess of 10.»,000 miles and is due for replacenwnt. This equipment w-as taidgeted for replacciaent in the sewer and water budget for 1994. Due to the use of this type of vehicle and the types of equipment that arc kept in the vehicle, wc are proposing replacement with a one ton size and a utility body. The utility bodies are now being constructed of fiberglass and can be switcted or transferred from one vehicle to another so that replacement in the future would be for the cab and chassis only. Wc do participate in the Hennepin County purchasing program and have received bids through them for a one ton cab aixl chassis. This year Thane Hawkins Chevrolet submitted the lowest bid for an amount of $19,’62. We have also received bids for a utility body for an amount of $5,857 from Crystetl, Inc. The total for cab and chassis and utility body amounts to $25,019. $22,000 was buJgcted, The 1984 vehicle will be auctioned at one of three or four vehicle auctions that are coriducted by Hennepin County Purchasing. If we were to purchase a one ton pickup and not the utility' body, the amount would be $19,493. Because the one ton cab and chassis and the utility body meets our needs, I am recommending purchasing that vehicle and body for an amount of $25,019. To: Frooi: Date: Mayor Callahan and Orono City Council Ron Mooraa, City Adminiatrator January 6, 1994 Subject: Inspection Vehicle •» ^ The Building and Zoning Department, which has an inspection staff of three, and t%#o management staff who often inspect properties as part of their review of zoning applications, has had two inspection vehicles. One of these, an old police squad, was recently sold duo to the cost of repairs exceeding the value of the vehicle. The other is a pickup used by the Building Insp>ector. All other staff use their personal vehicles fcr insp>ections. The Buildinq and Zoning Administrator has requested that the police squad be replaced by a small pickup to be used primarily by the Septic Inspector, and also to be available for use by other building and zoning staff as necessary or as available. Currently the Septic Inspector uses his own vehicle for septic inspections which involves transporting eqjipment that carries the odor of the inspection %rork. A pickup is most suitable for this work. The pickup to be purchased will be the lowest cost pickup available un’^r the State Joint Purchasing Contract. Although the initial cost estimate from the State was $8,800, the actual low bid amount was $9,736 plus sales tax for a total of $10,369. It is recommended that the pickup be funded through the City's Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund which has been set up for the purpose of equipment replacement. Isv TO: mOM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor ml City CouiKil Ron Moone. City Administntor January 6, 1994 Ordinance Adjustii^ Water mi Sewer Rates for 1994 V'*y * Aftachments : A. Proposed 1994 Water and ScNk^r Rates B. 1994 Utility Rate Study Summary of Rates C. Ordinance retlectmg the Proposed Sewer and Water Rate Adjustments Back!J vUliTf Both the sewer and water funds experienced operating losses m 1992. Although otter revenues in the sewer fund offset the operating loss to enable an overall increase in rctaiiKd camiiit;;s, the water fund experienced a $39,000 decrease in retained earnings Based on this experience and on recommendations from tte City ’s A ikIuot and direction from the City Council, suff has completed a rate stmly for both water and sewer rates for 1994. Tte results of tte rate study and the staff proposal regarding rate increases are described in tte information to follow. Rate Studs Tte rate swdy identifies all expenditures and determines the level of revenues needed to match tte expenditures. Tte total revenues are then translated into rates. There are three alternative revenue or funding level? included in the rate study analysis. Each alternative covers all operating expenditures. Ite difference in the rate levels is in the amount of depreciation funded. Tte minimum operating rale covers only operating expenditures and no depreciation. The modified operating rate recovers a portion of tte depreciation. The full operating rale recovers the full depreciation on all mains and lines. The staff recommendation reflects the modified operating rate. The reasons for using the modified operating rate are as tollows: 1 Tte utility rales should include a moderate level of funding of depreciation because there will be periodic major maintenance/repair expenditures that are beyond the level of ongoing maintenance reflected in the operating budget. For example, there are currently several lift stations that will require major upgrades in the next few years. This expenditure is beyond the general maintenance amount included in the operating budget, but can be funded out of retained earnings because the rales have included an amount of dwpreciation that has been set aside for this purpose. The funding of depreciation enables rates to remain more stable from year-to-year. If a fund e.xperiences a major maintenance expenditure, this can be at least partially funded through reserves rather than requiring a significant rate increase for a one lime major expense. Water and Sei»er Rate Study January 6. 1994 pa«e2 3. The irKKiificd operating rate was used as the basis fOT senmg the current rates. 4. The utility rates should not reflect full dcpreciatK>n because this would impoa too large a burden on the current utilits customers. Proposed Rate Increases The rate study resulted in a staff recommendation to increase both sewer and water rates by approximately 30^ The rate increases for both sew^r and water arc divided into an admtmstrative ind billing charge and an operation and maintenance charge. The administrative and billing charge rctlects the costs of ihr: utility billing clerk and a jxmion of other finance staff, the Public Works Director and the City Adininisirator for administrative support including general accounting, financial managenieni and geneui managen«nt support. The administrative and billing charges have increased by large percentages but relatively small dollar amounts. The increase is due to more closely reflecting the actual cost of providing administrative support for these funds. Sewer Fund Operating Budget The operating loss in the sewer fund in 1992 was due mostly to a $60,000 increase in MWCC charges. This trend of rapidly increasing MWCC charges will continue through 1995. The large increases in MWCC charges are due to the sudden change from very dry conditions to very wet conditions in the early 1990 ’s. Because the MWCC estimates flows as the basis tor annual billing, they make a correction to reflect the actual flows on a two year time lag. In the late 1980’s the dr> conditions were resulting in credits of $40-50.000 due to actual flows being much lower than estimates. In the very wet early 1990 ’s the flows were much higher than the estimates. This substantially increased MWCC charges for two reasons. First, the flows were substantially higher. Second, the $40-50.000 credits were replaced by $40-50,000 debits due to the flow being substantially above the MWCC estimates. This double increase has resulted in MWCC charges increasing from $165,000 in 1991 to $281,000 in 1994. This is a 70% increase over tour years or a 17.5% average annual increase. The MWCC fees are lurther projected to increase to $320,000 in 1995. This would be a 94% increase over five years. The large fluctuation MWCC charges based on wet and dry conditions makes it clear that infiltration and inflow (I & I) is a sig:ificant problem in the City’s sewer system. Staff is in die process of updating the City’s 19801 & I Study to identify the cause of the 1 & I and determine the most cost effective .wluiions. Sewer Rate Increases Attachment A shows the staff’s recommendation concerning sewer rates and a comparison to current rates. Attachment B shows the alternate rates under the minimum, modified, and fiiil WxttT and Seww Rate Study Januanr 6, 19^ page5 operating rate alternatives. The total rate increase for those with I sewer unit is 30.1 %. Tte increase for those whose billing is based on a per gallon charge is appnnimately 25%. The sewer rates have not been increased for a period of seven years. A 30% increase translates into a 3.85% per year increase over the 7 year period. Water Operating Budget The water fund has experienced rcdiKtions in retained earnings in K^h 19<il and 1992. This has reduced the retained earnings amount to $104,386 at the end of 1992 At t‘'e same time a new w^ll, pumping station, and water tower have been insullcd and arc operating. This has sigmficanlly increased the number of facilities requiring periodic maintenance and repair. Although the repair expenditures on these new tacilitics should be low, it is imponant that itw reuined earnings balance be maintained at a level that can handle an unanticipated major repair on either the new facilities or the older Navarre fjKilities. W'atfT Rate Increase The City has three water service areas These are; the Navarre area, the Wayzata area and the Highway 12/Long Lake area. The Navarre area is served by a City water tower, pumping station and water softening and iron removal facility. The Wayzata area is served by the City of Wayzata’s water system. The Highway 12/Long Lak.» area is a combination of the area that was served by the City of Long Lake water system but is now served by the new Highway 12 water system, and the area that started on the new Highway 1.2 system (Sugar Woods and Otten Bros.). The aiuchcd Table A shows staffs recommendations regarding water rates and a comparison to current rates. All of the rate calculations arc based on a usage of 25,0(X) gallons per quarter. The rate increases range from 26.6% in the Navarre area lo 30% in the Highway 12 area arxl 29.6% in the Wayzata area. The Navarre area water rales were last increased in 1991. The increase was 12.5%. Prior to 1991, the last increase was in 1986. when the rates were increased by 6.2%. The proposed increase would make the total increase over the past seven years 42.4%, for an average annual increase of 5.2%. The Wayzata area has not had a rale increase for at least ten years. The proposed 29.6% increase translates into an average annual increase of 2.65%. The Highway 12 rate was made effective in 1991, and has not been changed since then. The Highway 12/Long Lake water service area currently has a two tiered rate system. When the Long Lake area was on the City of Long Lake water system, the City of Long Lake was charging $2.50 per 1,000 gallons and Orono added $.25 as a maintenance charge for a total of $2.75. When the Highway 12 area came onto the new Orono water system the rate was set at $1.75. w Ja '' UlA'III*Sewer Rate Study tary 1994 ^4 When the new wattr tower was completed ind the Long LaLe area came onto tte Orono system it resulted in a two tiered rate system ($1.75 and S2.75). The rate study has shown that a rate of S2.26 is sufTic«nt tc fund the water operations tor the Highway 12 area. This results in an increase in the Highway 12 area from $1.75 to $2.26. and a rediKtion in the ^om:cr Umg Lake area from $2.75 to $2.26. The S2.26 rate eliminates the fwo-tiered ,>stem whi'e providing sufficient revenues to fund the water operations of the Highway 12 area. Counefl Actioa Requested: Motion to approve tte ordinance adjusting the sewer and water rate s for T994. TABLE B ciTT or oRca*o l>f4 OTILITT RATE STwDY SCS-MARY or RATEG R*t** Currently Effective Sewer aatee Based on sewer uuit billir-as Admin 4 Billing Current unit charge Miniw'-UB unit charge Modified unit charge Full un'.t charge Based on waier u^age Admin a Billing Current operating rate Miniuuo operating rcte Modified operating rate Full operating rate water Rates S2.30 / qtr $48.15 / qtr $2.f0 / qcr $2.00 /i.OOO gal Navarre service area Admin a Billing Ready to ser-/e fee Current operating rate Minimum operating race Modified operating rate Full operating rate Hwy 12 (1) / Lor'‘9 Admin & Billing Current operating rate Minimum operating rate Modified operating rate Full operating race Wayzata seir/ice area - Admin & Billing Current operating r-w^e Minimum operating rate Modified operating •ite Full operating rate $5.IS / qcr $10.40 / qtr $1.27 /I,000 gal 4 7^0 H vU EX>*r !?> Proposed Rates Percent Increase (Decrease) service area (1) $5.15 (2) $5.15 /qtr (1) $1.75 (2)*$2.7S /I.000 gal $5.15 / qtr $1.40 /I.000 gal $<.3S / qtr 119.3% $55.95 / qrr 16.0% $80.20 / qtr 24.3% $71.40 / qtr 48.0% $C.3S / qtr 119.0% $2.32 /l.000 gal IC.0% $2.50 /l,000 gal 25.0% S2.9</l,000 gal 48.0% $7.05 / qcr 36.9% $12.10 / qtr 16.3% $1.51 /l.OOO gal 18.9% $1.S3 /l.OOO gal 28.3% S1.9S /l.OOO gal 54.3% $ ;.05 / qcr 36.9% $1.77 /l.OOO gal 1.1% $2.26 /l,000 gal 29.1% $3.55 /l.OOO gal 102.9% $2.75 /l.OOO gal 57.1% $7.05 / qtr 37.9% $1.74 /l.OOO gal 24.3% $1.80 /l.OOO li A O . O * $1.94 /l.OOO gal 38.6% ORDINANCE NO.___, SECOND SERIES x*rACLv4 v\A$nJT 0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 123, SECOND SERIES, ADOPTED DECEMBER 13, 1993, AND ENTITLED "1994 FEE SCHEDULE." The Cit>- Council of Orono ordains: Ordinance No. 123, Second Series adopted December 13, 1993, and entitled ”1994 Fee Schedule” is amended to read: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES TTtilirv Service Rates - Effective beginning First Quarter 1994 MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE by unit: 1st each add ’l by flow: $ 66.55 per quarter $ 60.20 per quarter $ 2.50/1000 gallon plus $6.35 per quarter per connection MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE STUBBS BAY AREA PROJECT For those properties unconnected between 16 months after service availability and up to 5 years after service availability and meeting the criteria set forth in Ordinance No. 106, Second Series, allowing for hookup time extension, shall be charged only for the City portion of the sewer unit rate and not for the MWCC portion of the sewer unit rate. Stubbs Bay Area un-Connected Properties $ 30.15 per quarter MUNICIPAL WATER RATES Billing & ready to Serve Chg Water Usage Rate Unconnected Property Chg (ready to serve/hydr nt chg) Navarre Area $19.15/qtr $ 1.63/1000 gal $19.15/qtr Federally M.uidi;ied Safe Drinking Water Testing Program (Charged per service connection) Hwy 12 Area $ 7.05/qtr S 2.26/1000 gal -0- Chevy Chase Area $ 7.05/qtr $ 1.80/1000 gal -0- $ 5.21 per year, billing at $1.30/qtr Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area - Area #1 Rate $19.15/qtr billing charge plus $1.63/1000 gallon total flow at border meter. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the Council this 10th day of January, 1994. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorsc, City Adminisiraior January 7, 1994 SUBJECT: Resolution to Acquire Tax Forfeit Property V The December 13 Council agenda included a recommendation that prior to making a decision about whether to acquire a 10 acre tax forfeit parcel, the City should analyze the parcel from both a park planning and a land use planning perspective to determine how it should best be used. I have since re-thought the recommendation in light of the City moving ahead with its Park Master Plan. Rather than doing an analysis of the individual 10 acre parcel, it makes more sense to review the parcel within the City’s Park Master Planning process. Because this process will not be complete for a number of months it is recommended that the City acquire the parcel at this time. If the park plan process indicates the parcel is not needed for park use, the City can recenvey the parcel to the County. A resolution to acquire the parcel is attached for Council adoption. fd REQUESTING CONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEIT LANDS FOR PUBLIC USE BY THE CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under tte laws of \bc State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282, tte City has received from Hennepin County a list of lands within the City which have become the property of the State of Minnesota for non-payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lands for compliance with local zoning ordinarK:es, for the amount of outstarKling special assessment remaining unpaid to the City, and/or for possible public use by the City as authorized by the stamtes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono, pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 282.01, Subdivision 1, hereby applies to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the Commissioner of Revenue for conveyance of the following tax forfeited land to the City for public use by the City of Orono. PARCEL RETAINED FOR USE BY THE Cn Y District P.l.D.Public Purpose 07-117-23 23 0001 Park Purposes Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held the 10th day of January, 1994, by a vote of__ayes and___nays. ATTEST:Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: r<Ron Moorsc, City Administraior John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Januiry 6, 1994 Reprogramming FuikIs Community Development Block Grant In 1992, year X\1II of the Community Development Block Grant program, the City of Orono allocated $2,736 to Park planning. Cities have 18 months to use the monies or they must reprogram or lose the funds. The deadline for use of ttesc funds was December 31, 1993. In order to reprogram the fimas, we must comiuct a public hearing and reallocate the funds to another project from that same year. The only ongoing project from that same year is Housing Rehabilitation. I have prepared a draft public hearing notice for Council review and approval for a public hearing to be conducted on February 14, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. cmr OF ORONO PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO COMMUNITY DE\’ELOPMENT PROGRAM Notice is hereby given that Hennepin County and the City of Orono will hold a public hearing to consider a "proposed amendment to the Year XVm Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the Urban Hennepin Community Development Block Grant Program funded under Title I of the Housmg and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended. The City of Orono proposes to reprogram Year XVm 1992 project fuiKls as follows: Delete project number 53098 Park Plan m the amount of $2,736 and increase the budget for project number 53099 Rehabilitation of Private Property by the same amount. The hearing is to be held on February 14, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. in the Orono City HaE located at 2780 Kelly Parkway. This public hearing is being held pursuant to a joint cooperation agreement between Hennepin County and the City of Orono under M.S. 471.59. Date: To : FroB: Sxibjact : /6 'A ',:s> Donation from the State Bank of Long Lake College Tuition ReimburBement Fund January 5, 1994 Ron Moorse, City Adainiatratoi for Hayor and City Council Steve Sullivan, Chief of Police Mr. Mike Byrne, President of the Long Lake State Bank, has offered to donate $1500 to the Orono Police Departoent for the purpose of reimbursing the tuition for college courses taken by officers on their o%fn time. The bank's Board of Directors has already approved this donation and Mr. Byrne has written the check. I explained that I needed council approval before I could accept that donation. Mr. Byrne and the bank's Board of Directors are excited about the opportunity to facilitate additional education for our officers. We all believe that the better educated the police officers are, the better equipped they are to address the complex problems they encounter as they serve the community. The offer is simple. The bank is willing to donate the money directly to the Orono Police. Any officer who wants to participate will obtain approval for a particular course, prior to enrolling, from the Chief of Police. Once the officer has Buccessfully completed the course, the officer will present proof of completion and proof of the eunount of tuition paid. The officer will then receive reimbursement for that tuition. I am requesting permission to accept this roost generous donation from the bank and to establish a tuition reimbursement program as outlined in this memo. LIST OF LICENSES FOR COLT^'CIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF JANUARY 10, 19M Residential Kennel License -Jane Kline/Stevc Bell 4455 West Branch Road Stephen Esco 320 Big Island \ % Sue Fackler 3700 Togo Road Septic System Installer License - A-Northem Cesspool Co. 10624 Douglas Drive Brooklyn Park kennel LIC2HSZ APPLICATION Effective January 1, 19_ _to December 31, 19 Owner: Address-Prcoerty Accress. Ji—- --- - - - - --- --- - - - - - - - - -(include cxty andzTp] vcailin, Addr.s. (ii different): ^ ^ tone: (hone) A-lX-S-iq-)------------------- (wer!0 ------------------ R3SIDKHTIAL Kennel License Infopation: $25.00 (payment must accompany application} Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:__\\ (over 3 months of age) pj-incipal Breed: Tav\^6_ _ _ _ _ _ Purpose for more than 2 dogs.—- - • -x Dogs normally Jcept: inside - - -kennel structure hskCIAL Kennel License Infopation: $150.00 (payment must accompany application; ciry OF ORO^o f/.VAVtf OFFICE 1 71 Tfr>.‘wVVVawiwwv'ww -Oi- OEH ^•^00Seto'a Name of Business: Business breeding, veterinary care, retaxi, e~)(example: Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name)(phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both :ity ordinance or other la« « premises prior to rrants the City permisssxon . i“*P® „„nable time during the License approval and at any j aorees to abide by the License duration; and 5.36 including any special renditions imposed by the City License approval- -K> v_^'- (■ ^ —- --- - -r~^- -- - - - - Dateplicant I _ _ _ _ ___ _ For City Use Only r. r . y Kenpai inspected by 0• J •Date a- 7' 9S Recommends Approval Y» Denial jczawx LICSHS2 MPtlCATlOH a (T Iffectiva January 1, to Dece-oier 31, 19. ' ^ mer: ■eoerty Agdress: (include city and 2-pi dlino Address (if different) one: J£2^LJ2112 sn (work) smBBTIAI. Kennel License I=fo«ation: S25.00 Tpa^^ acccnnany appUcation) Ma*iaur, Ho. of dogs to be )cept at one tine (over 3 months o- age) Principal f\ ^ ■ j — Pumose for nore than 2 dogs: r/e‘l-Si'/' < Dogs normally icept: stmcnure hMERCXAL Kennel License InforiMtion: Sl-0,00 (payment must accompany application) r Name of Business: Business Activities ——vp»^ar ’nary care, retailT(example: boarding, breecing, ve-er-na^/^ CITY OF OW ,^m:£ OFFICE 1312500000 01 CEH 25.00 Ci€CK Ti 25.00-----RECEIPT-r.HA^S YOU^^?292120 cool f<01 riO:J2 12/0S/93 Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside undersigned hereby makes this form; the its the City permisssion ^sonable time during the :ense duration; and the 5 *6^ including any specialoirements of Municipal ^od® Chapter 5. jcennel ditions imposed by the City Council approval. ir City Use Only /] // ;nns»l inspected by /T y. Orrrutyy^ y Denial Date /^^ scommends Approval KSNNKL LICS5JSZ APPLICATION Effective January 1, 19 *? V to Deceiaber 31r 19 Owner: Prcsemy Address:__ (Include city ana 3 >oo T~C) &o (include city ana zi?; m Mailina Address (if different):__________________ Phone: ;pg«;mmiTTAi. Kennel License Information: $25.00 (payment must acccmpany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be Icept at one time (over 3 months of age) ClTt OF OFOr,>Q r/,V4.Vr£ OFFICE 1313500000 Al!}cc0 6/?eePPrincipal Breed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Purpose for more than 2 S. Dogs normally kept: V'^^^^^side kennel structure t\i rrxi VI > Tf 4.^ iuvrv w-f %..VCi-^ror.TiMU* yr 9 9 9 int9*\ f w* V; I V r a iTva I 1 1 a a.' _ICIAL Kennel License Information: $150.00 (payment must acccmpany application) Name of Business: Business Activities _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _. . . . . (example: bearding, breeding, veterinary care.retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name)_ (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to council for a Kennel License as specified on undersigned acknowledges that a kennel gg any and doel not grant any authority h«Sy City Ordinance or other law or „ior togrants tha City pemisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approral and at any other reasona .bide by the license duration; and the t^S-?«« anv soecial requirements of Municipal Code pa.^ o£ any jfennelconditions imposed by the City Council as pairt or any license app^valLse app^vai. S5t^ 'Aoolfx For City Dse Only Kennel inspected by Recommends Approval Date Denial CITY V t)RONO oTtor ] aioNO ^ iDie____mlsenQ’^^^SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTAIXZRS LICENSE APPLICATION(612) 473|;7/57 Post: Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 iqq:; rv - p 9 8 . . » All -questions must be answered. ltiPc^n«e fee^t^ bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPC7. Certification must be attached. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Business addrass Business or trade name ^ A/C K ~/X ^ ^ g- 5 <S ^ ^ Business phor- -'6-/^0 Residence phone *47^^. f ^ Name of applicant or comoany representative holding MPCA certification F- —----------- PumperType of certification held: Installe^ Certificate expiration date Dec> /7f€ Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Most recent year ------- Have you ever had a license revolted? A/^ Where? __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ When? Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes Do you pump out septic tanks? Yes _ No K rTT'v nC nii^riUii wall wi i/nuifurrvA#;rr r#rrrrrf xnntfLfim I A W4.1f 7f .........A WA SUBMITTALS REQUIRED 01 Ti e.A M W50.CHECKKECEIPT-THm YOU M293640 cool iiOl T09:t I/''If S50.00 License application fee. 12/29/9 'J^2. $2000.00 license and permit bond na^ng ° g: — ^ obliqee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted.iaip.xl.-'Bxp.'A?/ LICENSES NILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED List persons other than applic^t who are au^orl^ed by you to apply for permits under your license —- - - - - - -" The undersigned hereby makes stems ^ Minnesota, for a ^subject tS the laws ot the SMte of rini::L?rind“thrrrd!nrn«i' =f t?.e eg of Orono. Date /-X Applicant's Signature CITY USE ONLY Staff recommendation Approval ® Reason for denial: _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ City Council Action Date _ _ _ _ Date license mailed_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Approved Denied r \ Oi/02/»4Ce PRREQOK 12/li/t3 PR CB PRRCGORCMP • NAMC OPT VTDGROSS471Btt060474563339476921119471I40971 475443162 472503991 469526026 475919721 464I21019 472529007 46I701I6I 507515424 469686562 461420132 469087114 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 477463877 471569863 477647279 504260307 472500574 121262417 480843542 477700023 334506281 468909535 476783251 470700901469848107 475382983 473746173 470566529 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 500403192477881539 ANDERSON. BRUCE L 31 BOBZICN, sue A 31 BORIS. SCOTT W 31 BOSMA. JAMIE L 12 BRINKHAUS. JOHN F 42 CHESWICK. GARY B 31 CORNICK. JAMES L 31 OEMBOUSKI, JAY C 31 CNQLISH III. IRVING 31 ERICKSON^ KURT R 31 FISCMENldH, DAN T 31 FRIT2LER. JOHN M 31 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P 33 GERHARDSON, JOHN R 42 GOMAN, DAVID J 35 GREGORY. JAMES D 42 HALLIN. DOROTHY M 12 HANSEN, STEVEN C 42 HANSING. CAROL J 31 HASEMAN. CAROLE 12 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P 31 KARNITZ, RICKY D 31 KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A 15 KUEHN,^ THOMAS M 15 MABUSTH, JEANNE A 33 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L 31 MOORSE, RONALD J 12 MOROWeZYNSKI, JAMES 31 OBCRAIQNCR, SCOTT Q 42 OBRIEN. RANDY L 92 OMAN. LYLE E 33 PALmEr, GREGORY A 42 QUAST. WAYNE A 92 RATHBUN. BARRY J 92 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B 31 SKREEN. DALE S 42 STEFFENHAGEN^ RONALD 93 SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X 31 THOMTON, MARK R 31 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F 31 TOMCZYK, MARK W 31 VANG. BRUCE L 33 VEE. LINDA S 12 WALTERS. LINDA G 15 WECKMAN, STEPHEN J 33 1635 1090 329 591. 1611 1727 1822 2105 19011568 1817 1692 1473 11640 350 1163 1269 1083 577 963 2084 255 1014 2167 1845 1463 2511 1646 1083 1144 1473 1432 1981 1083 610 1083 1269 2059 1551 1608 1657 1269 1014 1132 1117 847444 2167 20 07 94 48 40 93 23 43 59 49 04 27 28 86 93 60 05 63 61 21 00 83 82 26 20 43 28 18 27 81 27 28 .20 66 28 60 .28 .63 .68 .93 CURRENTGROSS1635 84 1090 74 329.44 591 211611.67 1727.20 1822.07 2105.94 1901.48 1568.40 1817.93 1692.23 1473 43 11640.59 350.49 1163.04 1269.27 1083.28 577.86 983 93 2084 60 255.05 1014.63 2167 61 1845 21 1463.00 2511.83 1646.82 1083.26 1144 20 1473.43 1432.28 1981.18 1083.27 610 81 1083.27 1269.282059.20 1551.66 1608.28 1657.60 1269.28 1014.63 1132.68 1117.93 EMP 6 NAME 71,977.03 471688060474563339476921819 471840871 475443862 472503991 469526026 475989721 468821018 472529007 468701868 507585424 469686562 498420832 469087884 474667812 475380151 477500666 475444249 477463877 471569863 477647279475604753 504260307 472500574 121202417 480843542 477700023 334506281 468909535 476783251 470700901 469848107 475382983 473746173 470566529 469629194 475569177 267460042 472563051 474663296 470704904 475505292 468629488 500403192 477881539 ANDERSON, BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A BORIS. SCOTT W BOSMA. JAMIE L BRINKHAUS. JOHN F CHESWICK. GARY B CORNICK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI, JAY C ENCLISH HI. IRVING ERICKSON, KURT R FISCHENICH. DAN T FRITZLER. JOHN M GAFFRON, MICHAEL P GERHARDSON, JOHN R GOMAN^ DAVID J GREGORY. JAMES D HALLIN. DOROTHY M HANSEN, STEVEN C HANSING. CAROL J HASEMAN, CAROLE JOHNSON. BRADLEY P KARNITZ. RICKY D KENNEH. JANICE M KNUTSON, CHARLOTTE A KUEHN^ tHOMAS M MABUStH, JEANNE A MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOORSE. RONALD J MOROWCZVNSKI, JAMES OBERAIQNER. icOTT G OBRIEN. RAM3Y L OMAN^ LYLE E PALMER, GREGORY A OUAST, WAYNE A RATHBUN, BARRY J SCHOEN»K>FF. JOHN B SKREEN. DALE S STEFFENHAQEN, RONALD SULLIVAN. STEPHEN X THOMTON. MARK R TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK, MARK W VANG. B*UCE L VEE, LINDA S WALTERS. LINDA Q WECKMAN. STEPHEN J t>pl YTO CUilfNTGROSSGROSS3146067.93 1561.413126594 02 1014.64315603 72 403.831216174.30 576.044241864.67 1611.673145062 30 1727.213147470 90 2356.003140714 01 1546.213146711.76 2249.663141905 01 1561.403145759 66 1151.863143961 69 1692.24334238273 88 93146.90 3S 42 6054.78 34231.21 12 32970 71 126B.284230970 22 1250.163115112 63 549.831225112 46 986.513145492 08 1561.40313026.06 573.85316351.63 190.28IS26375.17 1014.641556305.45 2167.603347631.02 1145.213138023.01 1319.201262452.10 2311.843144385.••1596.404230262.22 1063.299232093.95 1300.613338273.81 1473.444230366 98 1139.129237515.27 1399.339230849.72 1093.433111874.91 531.354230527.55 925.859332970.69 1269.283153489.56 2059.203140734.92 1506.763142477.27 1585.253143086.03 1715.443332970.72 1261.281227499.25 1115.36IS24666.94 U17.993329Q3l.il 1117.92 61,512.41 ij OCOUMCIL CWtCK HCGISTEH Fri D*c 10amouk?l»*3/12/0»029SII 02.SM *”3/12/01021510 *”3/»2/Ot021511 *”3/»2/01 1**3 0l;34:«3. . .. . . . . . . . . DcsctmionCITT COOUTY CltOIT UKl’w/HVti^WtRiEo*137.il* 'OLOHIAL life IBS*4.131 00 14.931 00*t«7 77 *67.77**11.330.11 *11,330 ll* 021592 1193/12/09 *2.619 21 *2.*49.2* 029593 I113/12/01 19*j/12/01 *14.051.55 *35.150.71 949.909.26 021S14 1993/12/09 *1.355.00 *1.355.00- 029595 1993/12/09 *146.50 *144.50* 029591 1993/12/09 *164.00 *164.00* 029517 1993/12/09 *30.00 *30.00* 029591 19*3/12/09 *5.09 *5.09* 029599 1993/12/09 *3.746.92 *3.746.92* 029100 1993/12/09 *100.00 *100.00* 029101 1993/12/09 >29 43 *29.43* 029602 1993/12/09 *763.48 *763.46* 029603 1993/12/09 *60.00 *60.00* 029604 1993/12/09 *5.047.54 *5.047.54* 1993/12/09 *21.00 IKS W/HCOMMEICIAL LlFf IPfS IBS W/M FIFST BATIOBAL bank or W/h fed TmK NEOCl/FI , fltST NATIOBAL BASK OF CITY SHAKE FICA/HEOC KJigat KR 5 UBEAT WEST LIFE ASSUBA DEF COMB W/H HEBHEFIB county SUFFOB MABK TMOHTON iC02667 HEBBEFIB COUBTY SUFPOF dale SKBEEB iC02«23l ICMA BETlBEMEBT TIUST- W/M DEF COMF HINNCSOTA BEHEFIT ins W/H MIBBESOTA deft of BEVE state tax W/H MB STATE BETIBEMEBT-DE W/H DEF COMF PEBSCO/OBFA FEBSCO/US COMF OF MAYO W/H DEF COMF feba life ins ins w/H pr»A FEBA W/H HOLIDAY 150 UNITED WAY CHARITY W/H ACCOUNT • 1111-20309999-2030•999-2030 INVOICE000513003595000514 9999-2030 030592 9*99-2030 000591 *999-2030 9999-2030 000577 0OC57I 9999-2030 000512 ••*9-2030 000595 •999-2030 000596 9999-2030 0QQS99 •999-2030 000593 9999-2030 000590 9999-2030 000511 9999-2030 0Q0S90 9999-2030 000579 9999-2030 000599 9999-2030 000597 9999-2030 000596 ©FO RUN Fif# 1manualIFIFIF IF IF o o oCOUHCIL CHECK tCQISTEi Fri Otc 10 ltt3 CHECK HO CHECK DATE CHECK AHDUMT 01:34:43VEMDOA K«f* tDfSCRlPTIONACCOUMT 4 INVOICE PO HUM. MANUAL .......02M0S 121.00* 110,531 02 ■1 o ' • 'v.V C-) COUNCIL CHECK KEGISTEt We4 Dee 1993 01:5f 12 1CHECK HO CHECK DATE CHECK AHC»HT VEHDM OCSCtlPTIOH ACCOUNT 9 INVOICE PO NUM MANUAL02M241993/12/23 *42.27 *42.27*Alt $TA9 ILICT9IC REPAIR U*T 0249-4233 •272-24 OH0296251993/12/23 55.000 0015.000 00*ANDEKSQII, EDHA T ESMT LS 319 WESTLAKE 040I-4S12 001279 OH 029828 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 651 03 fSi 0? 6102.05* AS9LUM0 COfFEE ASPLUNO COFFEE COFFEE COFFEE 0039-43120174-43*2 •6456 • «45*WOH 029627 1993/12/23 911.00 *11.00* ASSN ICTiO IftJNICIKS HTQ 0039-4358 001271 m 029628 1993/12/23 *91.11 991.11* BOYCK tiik:ks REPAIR 0249-4341 • 5099 OH 029629 1913/12/23 624.26 624 26* B9C-ASSIST CENTl*LICENSE FORMS 0039-4322 410S399 OH 029630 1993/12/23 660.00 690.OO* CIRCUIT RESEARCH CORR TESTS 0549-4306 31215405 OM 029631 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 653 00 653.00 692.34 6196.34* CITYVIEW RLM8G i HTG CITVVIEW RLMOO A HTG CITYVIEW RLMBG A HTG REPAIR CITY HALL TOl REPAIR POLICE TOILET SERVICE RO FURNANCE 0099-4343 0099-4343 0099-4343 15353 154311 15392 Si OH 029632 1993/12/23 6405.79 5405.79* COLONIAL LIFE INS CO INS 0129-4152 001210 OH 029633 1993/12/23 9106.15 6106.15* CORY OUR Ri INC TRANSPARENCIES 9001-1261 01142075 OH 029634 1993/12/23 61.027.00 61.027.00* CORNERHOUSE INTERAGENC 93 SERVICE 0126-4306 001293 OH 029635 1993/12/23 66.00 66.00* CULLIGAN WTi SOFTNER 0590-4343 001292 OH 029636 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 662 35 610.00 672.35* DIXIE PETRO-CHEM DIXIE PETRO-CHEM ACID DEMURRAGE 0549-4234 0549-4234 0101349 D0101276I OH OH • 029637 1993/12/23 6127 73 6127.73* DRAKE HYDRAULIC SERV C SUPPLIES 0249-4342 022606 OH 029639 1993/12/23 6400.00 6400.00* DUTTON. JOSEPH TRAINING 0129-4356 001294 OH Q296J9 1993/12/23 1159 68 $159.86* FRANKLIN QUEST CO CONFERENCE 0039-4356 10036200 OH 1993/12/23 $45.49 GALL’S INC.RECORDER 0129-4210 5639198 OH \ )COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WtR D«c 29 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AHOUNT 1993 01:5112VENDOR OESCIIRTION ACCOUST t IHVOICC 90 NUM R«f* iMANUAL029R40 020641 029642 020643 029644 029645 029646 029647 029646 029649 029650 029651 1003/12/231993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1903/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1003/12/23 1993/12/23 1003/12/23 1903/12/23 1093/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1903/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 645.49-6143 10995 40 6236 50- 612.27 112.27* 914.16 614.16- 615 00 915.00- 93.712.50 93.712.50* 99 94 99.95 929.03 99.96 99.94 99.06 979.59- 93.522.60 931.71 93.561.31* 916 36 616 36- 62.104.15 92,104.15- 9149 21 927 45 615.07 994.51 636 22 97.01 933.29 959.30 9410.OS- 9239.63 9126.49 9366.11* GO^t STATE one CALL GOPHER STATE ONECALL KEAVEHTS DRUG LMCC nov ret NOV PEI SUPPLIES SIGN >4ET10 AREA MDMT ASSN HTO METRO WASTE CONTROL CO NOV SAC PEES MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST MIDWEST BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS BSNS PROD PROD RROO PROD PROO PROD OPFICE OPPICE OPFICE OPPICE OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO UTILITIES UTILITIES MN CHIEFS 0> POLICE AS FORMS MORTON SALT NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE NORTHLAND BUSINESS NORTHLAND BUSINESS 6295.15 NSP 6390.50 NSP 920.26 NSP ROAD SALT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TRANSCRIBER CASSETTES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES 0500-43080549-4308 0129-4210 0020-4322 0039-4356 9001-2229 0249 0069 0129 0059 0174 0039 4210 4210 4210 4210 4210 4210 0099-4324 0569-4324 0129-4322 0249-4233 0249 0099 0590 0249 0129 0290 0549 0569 4232 4231 4232 4233 4232 4231 4234 4234 0039-4393 0129-4210 0569-4324 0549-4324 0569-4324 3110520 3110520 001211 001295 001299 001293 001296 001299001290 001206 001206 C01296 001297 001297 001212 27313 001204 001294 001294 ''01294 U»1294 001284 001294 001294 6923 7120 001295 001300 001300 ON OH OH OH OH Si OH OH OHm OH OH OH OHI 0H» OH OH OM OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH .j eOUWCIL CHCCK lEGISTCt Vt4 C*€ 2t 1913 01:99:12 DCSCRIPIION ACCOUNT •1183/12/231983/12/231883/12/231893/12/23 9175 55 81,455 93 il27.52 91.932 S3 HSPns^MSP UTILITIESUTILITYUTILITIESUTILITIES 0548-43240589-43240099-4324 029852 94,017 44* 1993/12/23 91,132 45 WSP STREET LIGHTS 0249-4325 029953 81,132 4S« 1993/12/23 921.50 roSTMfcSTtt PO NOX RENTAL 9001-1292 028954 921.50* 9999-20311893/12/23 94,799 98 FOOLIC EM#L ilT ASSN PERA 12/8-12/18 0298$S 94,781.98* 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 t3.95 811.57 94.82 RITZ CAMERA 8ITZ CA»«RA R1T2 CAMERA riLM RROC FILM PROC FILM PROC 0129-4210 0129-4210 0129-4210 029iSt 828.94* 1993/12/23 9197.50 SWING PASS CAR WASH CAR WASH TICKETS 0129-4341 029857 9117.SO* 1993/12/23 8943.13 TOWN A COUNTRY DEC CLFANIMQ 0099-4349 029851 9983.93* 1193/12/23 977.45 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFMMS 0115-4221 029858 877.4S* 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 1993/12/23 944.39 944.39 963.91 913.30 $291.38 S«4.39 934.06 US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMMUN OAT.' LINE DATA LINE TELEPHONE DATA 1INE TELEP*K)NC DATA LINE DATA LINE 0089-4355 0129-4355 0549-4320 0549-4355 0129-4320 0174-4355 0589-4355 028880 9522.74* 1993/12/23 987.58 WATERPRO REMOTES 9672-1273 020881 867.58* INVOICE 90 HUM SMUAIAL 930,325.88 J ) 001300001299001297001300 001213 001291 001301 37C75II 3799299 3719141 001291 001290 428991 001291 001291 001291 001291 001302 001291 001291 528992 ONOHONON ON QM OHi OM OH m OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH )»COJWrU CHECK tEOlSTE* Tka Jaa | CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHEf* ' UNT02SB8S1884/Ol/OS 9a.93t 00 84.936.00*029688 1994/01/05 8137 It 8137 11* 029U7 1994/01/05 867 77 897 77* 028888 1914/01/05 810*.083.10 810.083.10* 029S89 1994/01/05 83.401 86 83.401.86* 029670 1B84/01/0S 535.771 44 835.771 46* 028871 1984/01/05 98.777 00 18.777 00* 028872 1894/P1/05 8491.54 8491.54* 029673 1994/01/05 8146.50 8146.50* 029674 1994/01/05 9194 00 8164.00* 02967S 1994/01/05 930 00 830 00* 029676 1994/01/05 8350 00 8350.00* 029677 1894/01/05 9211.01 8281 01* 029871 1994/01/05 91.294 32 SI.264.32* 029879 1994/01/05 85.09 85.09* 029610 1894/01/05 92.95$ 48 82.855.48* 029681 1994/01/05 9100.00 9100.00* 029682 1994/01/05 935.04 $35.04* o lt«4 03 24 07. . . . .. . . . . . . . DCSCKIKTIOMCITr COWiTV CIIEDIT UHrM/H***TlA«FEtiED'*'COLONIAL LIFE IKS INS W/H CCI#IEICIAL LIFE INS IMS W/H FItST NATIONAL iAMK OF W/H FED/MEDCR/FICA T FliST NAT OKAL iANK OF CITT SHAtt FICA/MEDC FIKST NATIONAL SANK OF NET FAyhoLL TRANSFER GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA OIF COMR W/H GIOUF HEALTH FLAN w/H INS HENNEFIN county SUPPOR mark THOMTON IC02e$7 KENMIPIN COUNTY SUFROR DALE SKREEN iC02E231 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST- W/H OEF COMP LAW enforcement LABOR W/M UNION DUES MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN W/H INSURANCE MCDICA choice ins W/H MINNESOTA BENEFIT INS W/H MINNESOTA DEPT OF REV£ STATE TAX W/H MN STATE RETIRE^^NT-DE W/H DEF COMP PEBSCO/OBRA y/H DEF COMP > ACCOim 9 . . . .INVOICE P99t 1PO NUM. MANUAL9999-2030 000614 IP 9999-2030 000825 IP 9999-2030 000124 IP S999-2030 000813 IP •999-2030 000815 IP 999R-2030 000818 IP 9999-2030 000928 IP 9999-2030 000629 IP 9999-2030 000810 IP 9999-2030 000811 IP 9999-2030 000817 IP 9999-2030 000808 IP 9999-2030 000912 IP 9999-2030 000622 IP 9999-2030 000627 IP 9999-2030 000918 IP 9999-2030 000630 IP 9999-2030 000629 XP O >)COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Th« Jaa 9 1994 03:24.07 rag* 2CHECK NC) CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT i INVCICI PO HUM.MANUAL0216131994/Ol/OS St63 46 $••3 46*PEiSCO/US COKE or MAYO W/H DEF COMP 9999-2030 000631 IP 029614 19*4/01/05 666 00 666.00* rCHA LIFE ms IKS W/H 9999-2030 000*31 IP 0296IS 1994/01/05 64.049 51 64.049 SI* PEKA PEKA W/H 9999-2030 000619 IP 1**4/01/05 616.00 UNITED WAY CHAKITY W/H 9999-2030 000923 IP 021616 SII.OO* S74.lt4.39 J COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TRu Dec 23 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 1193 0237 2SVEMOOR DESCRIPTIONCITT COUNTY C8COXT UNI W/H A TRANSFCRRCO ACCOUNT ■ i999-203d INWICEI ^ ^ ^ ^ 9^9OOOStl RO NUH R|9* 1 MANUA029809029810029811 029912 029613 0296U 029819 029816 029617 029611 029819 029820 1993/12/221993/12/221993/12/22 1993/12/22 1993/12/22 1993/12/22 1993/12/22 1993/12/22 1993/12/22 1993/12/22 1993/12/22 1993/12/22 S4.939.00S4.938.00*S9.34S 02 S9.34S.02*S2.S88.6IS2.588.88* S39.4S4.94 S39.4S4.94* S1.3SS.00 S1.3SS 00* 830.00 830.00* 82.966 64 S2.968.64* 8100.00 SIOO.00* 8114.67 S114.87* S763.46 8763.46* 83.618.44 93.618.44* S21.00 821.00* 865.293.85 FIRST NATIONAL BANK Of WITHHELD FED TX MEDCFIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CITY SHARE FICA/MEDC FIRST NATIONAL BANK Of NET PAYROLL TRANSFER GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA OEF COMR W/H ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST- W/H DEF COMP MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVE STATE TAX WITHHELD MN STATE RETIREMENT-DE W/H OEF COMP PEBSC0/0B8A W/H OEF COMP PE8SCO/US CONF OF MAYO W/H DEF COMP PER A UNITED WAY PERA W/H CHARITY W/H 9999-20309999-2030 9999-2030 9999-2030 9999-2030 9999-2030 9999-2030 9999-2030 9999-2030 9999-2030 9999-2030 000597000S99 000600 0QQ904 000601 000602 000606 000607 OQ0608 000603 Q0060S COUNCIL CHECK KEGISTEi fri Jan 7 i§94 CHECK NO CHECK DATE CHECK A' iNT 12:0401VENDOff DESCtmiW ACCOUNT •INVOICE 170 NUM029690 029691 1994/01/101994/01/10 1994/01/10 029692 029693 029694 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 02969S 029696 029697 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 i #15 91 alSl 65 $167 63^BLACKOWIAK 4. SONS BLACKOWIAK 4i SONS T9ASH HAUL TRASH HAUL 0590-43430099-4343 $117.54 f117.54* BLUHBERG COMMUNICATION BULBS 0039-4210 $612 $480 $320 $294 $80 $911 $10C $401 $1,707 57 00 00 25 CO 00 00 25 48 B0NEST900 BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTRCX) ROSENE ASH ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ROSENE ASN ENG CONSULT SEPT CAPITAL INPROVEMENT PRIVATE ROAD PLAN DNR WATER PERMIT ENG CONSULT SEPT ENG CONSULT SEPT SEPT COUNCIL MTGS EASEMENTS SEPT INSPECTION SEPT 0200 0200 U200 0200 0200 0840 0200 0408 0408 4305 4305 4305 4305 4305 4305 4304 4306 4306 $4.976.55* $163 52 $163 52* CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL EL REPAIR LS97 0569-4344 001303QQ1303 BM144475-IN 026482 026482 026482 026482 02K482 026482 026482 026483 026M3 3009 $5,265 00 $5.265.00* E-Z RECYCLING DEC FEE 0295-4392 000845 $47.04 KUEHN.THOMAS MILEAGE 11-19 TO 12-0069-4381 001304 $34.50 KUEHN.THOMAS MILEAGE 11-19 TO 12-0569-4381 001304 $12.54 $94.08* KUEHN.THOMAS MILEAGE 11-19 TO 12-0174-4381 001304 $14.16 $14.16* L.M C C.C.SIGN-TONKA REPORT 0039-4380 001305 $3,953.00 $3,953.00* LEAGUE Of MN CITIES LHC DUES 0020-4380 001306 $220.00 LOG IS - SUITE 300 OCTOBER SERVICE 0549-4352 AR1093 $409.00 LOCIS - SUITE 300 OCTOBER SERVICE 0569-4352 AR1093 $579.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 OCTOBER SERVICE 0129-4352 AR1093 $1,203.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 OCTOBER SERVICE 0069-4352 AR1093 $79 14 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DISC SPACE AUG-OCT 0569-4355 AR1093 $781.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 OCTOBER SERVICE 0174-4352 AR1093 $39 00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 OCTOBER SERVICE 0039-4352 AR1093 $75.00 LOGIS - SUITE 300 OCTOBER SERVICE 0039-4355 AR1093 $16.25 LOGIS - SUITE 300 COURIER 0569-4352 AR1093 $35.47 LOGIS - SUITE 300 NETWORK SERVICES 0069-4340 AR1093 $35.47 LOGIS - SUITE 300 NETWORK SERVICES 0129-4340 AR1093 $35.47 LOGIS - SUITE 300 NETWORK SERVICES 0174-4340 AR1093 $35.48 LOGIS - SUITE 300 NETWORK SERVICES 0569-4340 AR1093 $93.91 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DISC SPACE OCT-AUG C039-4355 AR1093 $1,214.08 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DISC SPACE AUG-OCT 0069-4355 AR1093 $2,806.82 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DISC SPACE AUG-OCT 0129-4355 AR1093 $125.38 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DISC SPACE AUG-OCT 0174-4355 AR1093 $42.62 LOGIS - SUITE 300 DISC SPACE AUG-OCT 0549-4355 AR1093 Pafa 1 MANUALOHOH OH OH OH OHi OH[ OHI OHI OHI OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH \ ■)COUNCIL CHECK NO029$tl CHECK REGISTEK Fri Jan 7 CHECK DATE CHECK AMCHJIITS7.126.09^1994 12:04:01VEN009 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 9 INVOICE Pift 2PO NUH. MANUAL0296991994/01/101994/01/101994/01/10 99.95 9194 47910 95 9204 37*NS9NSPNSP UTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIES 0290-43240569-43240249-4324 001307001307Q01307 OHOHOH 029700 1994/01/10 915 00 915.OC* OBRIEN,RANDY certificate 0549-4313 C0I30I OH 029701 1994/01/10 950.00 950.00*RCRSOHNEL DECISIONS POS PROFILE /JOB EVA 0299-4900 GI1911t OH 029702 1994/01/10 9874.31 9874.31* POPHAM HAIK 4 ASSOC REVISED 456 AUG 0010-4303 371719-1 OH 029703 1994/01/10 93 65 93 65* RITZ CAMERA FILM PtOC 0129-4210 3761143 OHj 029704 1994/01/10 1994/01/10 9120.74 9141.90 9262.64^ US WEST COMMUN US WEST COMUN TELEPHONE ADV 0590-4320 0590-4323 001309 001309 OH OH S23.fl7 54 \ t %t \ TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator John R. Gcrhardson, Public Works Director Jamiarv 6. 1994 SUBJECT: Donation - Davlon’s Department Store Emplo>'ees Recently I received a call from Alby Zaikoff an employee of Dayton ’s department stores. Alby stated that a group of Dayton ’s employees have participated in the "Adopt a Highway Program" sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Because the employees provide a community service. Dayton ’s has offered to help pay for any expenses incurred up to $300.00 per year. Because there have been no expenses, the Dayton ’s employees would rather donate the money to the City of Orono for use towards a community project. One that comes to mind is the wild flower seeding project at French Creek Park Reserve. (The old sewer treatment plant site.) If the City agrees to accept the money, a representative of the Council and the Park Conunission should attend a meeting when and where the check would be presented to the City. INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEEHN6 JAN 1 0 1994 CITYOFORONO OF To:Ron Mootsc. City Administrator I'r Michael P. Gafiron, Aisistan! Planning St Zoning Administrator Date: January 7, 1994 Subje<i: #177S-79 Gocnen Plat - Fee Issue List of Exhibits A - Appikant’s Lener re: Fees Received 12/23/93 B - Dmil of Costs Incurred by City C - Suit Letter to Applicant 7/9/93 Judicial Landmark RepbKement The prcliminaiy plat approval resolution indicated that the City shall have tlw Judicial Landmark (JLM) at the east end of the property replaced in its correct location. That monument was removed in 1981 when the Bluffs’ sewer went in. The Public Works Director made arrangements with Mark Gronberg to replace it last summer. We estimated the cost of that replacement to be arouiKl $200. However, when the plat was submitted to the County Surveyor for acceptance, tlw fact that a majority of the judicial landmarks were missing or out of place, and the fact that Section 2 has other survey inconsistencies, led the County Surveyor to require that the judicial landmarks either be correctly replaced or all removed. Either process requires a court action. As a result, applicant has initiated a legal proceeding to have ail of the judicial landmarks removed, and had therefore asked tla City to delay replacement of that landmark pending final outcome. Fee Dispute Additionally, applicant has submitted a letter indicating he will not pay any bills for City costs incurred related to his subdivision since he feels the City s tailure to replace the JLM has caused him great expense. The significant question is whether the City ’s failure to replace the JLM was the sole reason why the applicant was required to initiate this "proceeding subsequent". Conversations with the County Surveyor ’s Office, applicant’s surveyor and die City Engineer have led me to conclude that such a procedure would probably have been necessary even if th'- easterly comer marker had never been disturbed by the City, due to the other landmark problems. The legal and engineering bills for this subdivision to date have already exceeded the total initial application fees and final plat review fees paid to date by the applicant by approximately $500, without accounting for staff time or the additional costs we will incur when the plat is actually filed. Please review applicant’s letter (Exhibit A) and Exhibit B which details the costs incurred vs. fees paid. Zoning FQc uf I77S-79 Janu«y 7. 1994 Page 2 The lu^id balance of the incurred consultant costs already bilkdi amounts U) $504.49. Adding this to the (con^rvatively estimated) aaff tmK expended of 12.5 hours at $29.00 per hour or $362.50, and the actual legal costs yet to be mcuned when the City Attorney files the plat (cstim^ed at $200), results in a total unpaid City expenses of nearly $1,100. Staff Re UIUIII nendatkm It is staffs opinion that applicant should be credited the 5200 estimafed cos for the City to have physically replaced the easterly comer JLM to the location it was removed from. It is sufTs opinion that applicant should therefore be liable for the remainder, just under $900. A foil £Sg jp. OeceoberiSlOafiilGMSliil Michael P. Gaffrori Assistant Planning and Zoning Adninistrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 DEC 2 3 Dear Mr Gaffron; As you know the City of Orono forwarded to me in early sunraer various billings relating to the City’s out of pocket ex­ penses incurred in considering a subdivision of our property located at 1385 Fox Street in Orono. It is my recollection that the billings approximated $500.00/100. Feel free to check the accuracy of th^s amount. As I indicated to you by phone yesterday, and as I have indicated by phone to Ron ftorse some months ago, I respectfully decline to reimburse the City by check for these expenses. You are aware that we granted the City an easement for a “Lift Station” at the apex of the triangular piece of our main lot parcel. The easement specifically required that existing boundary markers be maintained by the City during and after the Lift Station construction period. A Judicial Marker, placed originally pursuant to a 1945 survey was lost in the Lift Station construction period, and was never replaced even though we requested the City to act on several occasions . The loss of this Judicial Marker on our triangular piece, and the renroval of a Judicial flarker (apparently by Hennepin County road crews) on the rectangular lakeshore piece of ou>" total property has made it impossible for us to defend or prove the 1945 survey on either piece of our ground. In preparing for our plat it was necessary for us to undertake and accept an entirely new survey of the property, with changes in all dimensions, rather than simply verify dimensions established carefully and with judicial proceedings in 1945. Additionally it has been necessary for us to initiate a Judicial proceeding to re­ move the remaining Judicial Markers set pursuant to the 1945 survey. For purposes of simplicity, it is my position that the City's failure to adhere to the provisions of the easement agreement have cost me about what the City says my subdivision application has cost it. I have not received all of the billings relating to the additional survey and legal expense on this matter, but I have received enough to know that I ann)ffering ^u a bargain. Andrew J. Goetten B StJNKXRT - COSTS XNCURRKD/mS PAID #177t/1779 F««s Paid: Application Fee #1778 Application Fee #1779 Legal Review/Filing Fee Costa Incurred: I.City Attorney 3.0 hrs. $175.00 350.00 200.00 $725.00 10-23-92 10-23-92 3-17-93 February 1993 (2/8,2/19, 2/22) Totals; $447.00 Professional Services 157.74 Expenses $604.74 Billed to City II.City Engineer 10-92 0.5 hr at 52.00 2.5 hrs at 52.00 1.0 hr at 77.75 4.0 hrs at 77.75 1.0 hr at 80.00 11- 92 11-19-92 12- 92 1-4-93 $ 26.00 130.00 77.75 311.00 90.00 $624.75 III. Staff Time - Review of application, preparation of memos, exhibits, resolutions, etc. 12.5 hours at 29.00 • $362.50 IV. Additional Anticipated Expenses City Attorney (Plat Filing) • $200.00 (est.) Total Costs Zncurred/Antleipated: $604.74 624.75 362.50 2QQ 00 $1791.99 - 725.00 $1066.99 - 200.00 $ 866.99 Legal Engineer Staff Legal [eat.) Less Amount Paid As of 1/6/94 Less est. City cost to have JLM re-set Balance outstanding July 9. 1993 ^ Q. CITY of ORONO MuitidiBl Office nrtet Uittut 2750 iiiilCT Ore*. 55354 Mag PQ tmit ZrpiM MS 55323 Mr. Andrew Goeflen I3S5 Fo* Street Wayzata. .Minxiesoca 55391 Re: Legal/Engincering Bill Dear Mr. Goettea; Accompanying this cover letter is a revised legal and engineering bill reflecting the $200.00 "legal revKw and filing fee* which you paid on March 17, 1993. Normally, this payment is not credited until we receive the final legal billing, however, siiKe your application has incurred other legal costs, we will credit it towards the current bill. Please be advised that since the entire application fees paid by you have been credited towards legal and engineering costs iiKurrcd to-date, you will at the end of the process be receiving an uMiiional billing for staff time incurred as well as any forthcoming legal or engmeenng costs. Once I receive the final plat drawings showing your fmal lot lines, that information will be submitted to the City Assessor for determination of the valuation for park fee purposes. Just a reminder that Resoluuon #3224 granting preliminary plat approval will expire on January 11 1994 The final submittals for fmal plat approval listed on pa?es 4 and 5 ot Resolution #3224 should be submitted by the beginning of November to ensure timely final approval. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch cc: Linda Walter;, Asst. Finance Director Jeanne A. Mabusdi, Building & Zomng Adm, Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 4734K10 • nu LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT '' t' ■ :-l LAKE USE AND RECREATION C AGENDA IITTEE JAN 6 is^ Monday, January 10, 1994, 5:30 PH IHCO Office, Nervest Bank Building 900 C. Nayzata Blvd, Wayzata (Elevator access for Handicapped; use west entrance on Nayzata Blvd.) 1. Lakeshore lighting subcomnittee; informational report by Tom Line, electrical engineer 2. Progress on ''responsible wake" education brochure-staff report 3. Special Event Definition « resubmission of 11/17/93 aemd for committee recommendation 4. Quiet Waters Areas discussion on possible new areas to be designated quiet waters/no wake zones 5. Report on public information signs addressing vehicle operation wxthin 150' shorezone 6. Review liquor license fees 7. 1994 Save the Lake Recognition Banquet - recommendations for recipient of Water Patrol Special Deputy Award 8. Water Patrol Report A. Monthly Activity Report (handout) 9. Additional business 1/4/94 H. Todd Van Dellen State napraaintanve District 34B tlfwapai County Minnesota House of Representatives COiOirrmS: CSOVEHratENTAt. C^«ATK>*S ANO OMUING. state OOVCANMENT finance , taxes January 4, 1994 Ms. Dorothy M. Ha11in Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MM 55323 Dear Ms. Hallin: This letter is to confirm the reservation of the Orono council chambers on January 19, 1994, from 7:00 - 9:00pm, in the name of Representative Todd Van Dellen for the purpose of a town meeting. ThanJc you very much for your help in this matter. Sincerely, Todd Van Dellen State Representative cmrcF cm:N0 Ifr JAN 6 1994 14095 37ih Place North. Plymouth. Mirtnesoca 55447 State Office Buitding. St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 (612) 553-9068 (612) 296-5511 HOOA* Fax (612) 296-1563 100(612)296-9896 NOT PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE 1 To:Mavor Callahan and Oixhio Councilmcmbcrv from:Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zi)ning Administrator Dale:December 30. 1993 Subject:^hi»«hiif for Councilmemben ’ Attendance at Planning Ci>mmisslon Meetings for 1994 The following is a schedule of assigned attendance for Councilmcmbcrs to attend the Planning Commission meetings for the year 19W; January 18, 1994 (Tuesday) J. Diann Goetten Febniary 22. 1994 (Tuesday) Jo Ellen Hurr March 21, 1994 Gabriel Jabbour April 18, 1994 Charles Kelley May 16, 1994 Edward Callahan. Jr. June 20, 1994 J. Diann Goetten July 18, 1994 Jo Ellen Hurr August 15, 1994 Gabriel Jabbour September 19, 1994 Charles Kelley October 17, 1994 EMward Callahan November 21, 1994 J. Diann Goetten No December Meeting Optional meetings may be held on the first Monday of the month commencing May through October. Optional meetings are scheduled at staffs discretion depending upon the number of land use applications filed the previous month. Councilmemhers will be notified as soon as an option^ meeting is scheduled. PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATE• i*«RMIT TYPEBulldlnfSQL FAMlLY-NCWSF-AOO/HEMOOCLSF-ACC STKUCTUtEOewq/PPINCIPALCWJMEPCIAL-HCWCOM-AOO/RCMOOCL COM-ACC STPUCTUiDCNO IJJSTITUTIOli.lltW INST-AOO/REMODCL IWST-ACC STRUCT SF-LAMO ALT INST-LAND ALT PLAM REVIEW OWLV DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/OARAOCS SMb-tetal MccHanlcal HEATING SYSTEMS VENTILATION FUEL STORAGE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY Sub-total PluRiblno FIXTURES sprinkler WATER METER UPLACE METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sowor A Wator SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONKLCTion NEW SEPT! 4 'TE DRNFLD A yt ;*HK SAC ONLY SEPTIC C'-.„«t«fIN SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER A WATER UNDEFINED Sub-total OTV39212231004 0 1 0 9 1 1 1 1 13 20 331* • 6 10 2 0 49 • 1 I 15 10 1Its* 127 1 12 1 2 143* 60 2 19 10 47 1 0 7 0 149* permit ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT 01/01/93 -RANGE - 1/30/93BASE FEE47.101 00 47,993.50 3.06t.50930.00 0.00234 00 0 00 30 00 0 00 2.199 00 330 00 126.00 0.00 0.00 455.00 3,779.50 107 110.50* 10.923.17 474.31 65.00 0.00 2,145.29 210.00 639.11 270.00 904.00 627.SO 35.00 15,993.39* 12.499 93 35.00 2,410.00 0.00 70.00 15.004.93* 2.099.50 70.00 1,900.00 550.00 30.750.00 50.00 0.00 490.00 0.00 35.909.50* VALUATION PLAN REVIEW10.913,315 00 9,960.020.44300.715.00 0.00 0.0012.309.00 0 00 0 00 , 0.00 934.900.00 37.000.00 10.245.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 515.970.00 21.194,443.44* 752.904.00 31.395.00 3.400.00 0 00114.997 19 9,250 00 51.129.00 2.925.00 25.572.00 34.129 59 1.900.00 1.024.361.75* 953.439.10 190.OU 600.00 o.on 950.00 955.139.10* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 30.97325.9021.13200 111 0 0 0 1.409 214II 0. 994. 0. 2.405 29 1379 00 00 IS 00 00 00 21 SO 90 00 43 00 91 •4.015.97* 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 u.oo 0 00* o.cro 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 G 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* QTY2419523•1 3 I O 3 O 0 0 c 1 6 17 792* 92 13 2 1 39 5 2 10 9 13 0 172* 95 Q 12 7 2 lit* I 3 11 32 3 0 1 6 1 95* •tauctn*.**9ASC FEE34.32333,9991.793399797 1.239 29 0 9.479 0 0 0 0 15 110 2.007 93,249 0000005000 00 00 00 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 50 50* 4,115 420 90 30 1.245 150 90 300 190 390. 0. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7.090.00* 9.279 00 0.00 2.202.00 0.00 60.00 11.539.00* 240.00 90.00 1.100.00 1,540.00 0.00 0 00 30.00 360.00 30.00 3.390.00* VALUATION PLAN REVIEW7.9104.4911404145 179 1 2.541 .502.922.970,000 .000 .000 .200 0 .999 0 0 0 0 0.000 ,350 2171 15,591.312.00* 00.000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 53.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 10 1 0 3 0 4 0 77 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00* 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 22,310.0311.112.09 It.IS 0.00 9.511.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 . 0.00 1.295.39 49 713.24* PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATEREIKMT N8i. MtMTISS-1 DATE OF tUM 12/03/13 PCIWIT ISSUED iCPOPT CITr OF OtOMO Page ; f REQUESTER: CAROLE-• CUtRCNT PAMOE - 01/01/33 - 11/30/S3 PREVIOUS RANGE • 01/01/R2 • I1/30/R2PERMIT TYPE QTt ■ASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEWSJ Ji wpeXmanent/posted 1 35 00 1.200 00 0.00 7 210 00 3 fl7 00 0 00PER /FREE STANDG 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 30.00 1.000 00 %F * Af 0 00TEMPORARY5155.00 0.00 <0.00 4 120.00 2.500.00 0.00Syi-totil • •ISO.00*1.200 00*0 00*12*310.00*7.3R7.00*0.00* Fir* LAWN SPRINKLER 11 315 00 0.00 0.00 11 410.00 0.00 0 00FIRE SPRINKLER 1 41.00 2.400.00 311.20 2 1.029.00 210.230.00 •tl.isSub'tot «1 12*433 00*2.400.00*31.20*It*1.509.00*210.230.00*set.15* Us*r Defined LAND ALTERATION 13 700.00 0.00 0.00 22 1,180.00 203.000.00 0 00TREE REMOVAL 3 95.00 0.00 0.00 1 30 00 0.00 0.00RETAININQ WALLS 1 117.00 S.700.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 00 0 00LAWN SPRINKLER 3 105 00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 00S«b-tet*l 20*1.017.00*t. 700.00*0.00*23*1,210.00*203,000.00*0.00* Griad-totAl 143**175.541.21**23.077.244.2#**#4.047.07**Stt**10l,33i.50«*15.itl,9l«.0Q**50,3I2.09** PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATE«EK)«T N8R. irECilRT2-l DATE or RUN 12/03/93 '*• RERHXT rCE RERORT ••CITY or ORONO FROM 01/01/93 TO 11/30/93BUILDINGMECHANICALPLUMBINGSEWER A WATER USERBASE FEE 107.110.50 15.893 3i 15.004 83 35.899.50 1.017.00 190 00PLAN REVIEW 14.015.87 0 00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00SURCHARGE9.798.81 527.87 436 99 $2.00 6.15 0 00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SAC 10,500.00 0.00 0 00 4,500.00 0.00 0 00 INVESTIGATION 180.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0 00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 Q.OQ SEWER CONNECTION MAIL IN MAI IN 27.352.07 132.99 1 SO 48.38 910.60 3.00 WATER CONNECTION 5,406.18ADDL PLAN REVIEW 50.00 PERMIT TOTAL 224.385.43 li.«60 40 15.489.90 41.362.10 1.026.85 190.00 RA4C' 1REQUESTER; CARClEFtRt413.0031.209.70 0.00 o.oe 39.00 0.00 9.00 901.90 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12/03/93 BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT SEWER CONNECTION HAIL IN HAI IN WATER CONNECTION ADDL PLAN REVIEW PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL 175.548 21 64.047.07 10.798 92 0.00 15.000.00 320.00 0.00 28,262.67 187 03 1.50 5,408 *8 SO 00 299.623.58 •• PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/93 TO 11/30/93 PAGE; 2REQUESTER: CAROLE ZONINGPERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED YEAR-TO-DATER|^T NfJR. BMMTISS-1 DATE or AUN 12/03/93KAMIT TYACUttr DtflnvtfSUBDIVISIONVARIANCECUPSKETCH PLAN VARIANCC/CUP VACATION COMP PLAN AMEND Sub-lolal Qrand>totAl QTV13sa164 1 5 1 91* 91** REPOtTcnr Of oioiK)— CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/93 - 11/30/93BASE FEE4.99010,7502.9501.150 250 975 250 21.205 00000000 00 00 00 00* 21.205 00** VALUATION0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00* o.oo** PLAN REVIEW0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00*• »C^$TEl/cAi«.E *QTTIS3919 2 1 O 0 76* -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/92 - 11/30/92BASE FEE VALUATION5.9107,1252.700 200 175 0 0 19.110 000000 00 00 00 00 00* 16,110 00** 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00** PLAN REVIEW0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00*» REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 12/03/93 '** PERMIT FEE REPORT **CITY Of ORONO FROM 01/01/93 TO 11/30/93 PAGE; 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 21,205.00 21,205.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 1 SAC 0.00 0.00 1 1 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 1 (! DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 • 1 PERMIT TOTAL 21.205.00 21.205.00 itf3 MCAT or conTtici ciuti^tao tevitw 0.00Insptctlm 00.00 tt*a<nar ?5.00 total 05.00 rtan lavitiit 0 io. Irmp^tfonsi 4 OinrwtarOia Otodi Olan OeviM 0.00 Irwptctions 75.00 ittlfmf is.m total 100.00 No. rian Novlowt 0 No. Inoptctiono 5 Jonuory fobruory Plorch April «Kno lut V510.01 186.43 218.n 76.05 368.23 70.20 1,112.91 ».45 M4.85 3*9.9*m- I IV 12,8^.t7t05.00 135.00 90.00 150.00 150.00 165.80 120.00 75.00 150.00 1,105.0025.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 n.oo 275.00660.83 546.43 333.75 251.05 543.23 260.20 1,277.95 186.45 *74.09 54*.f*5,372.8631112242Ss227f610101105fTO87 46.00 122.05 281.13 286.90 2.707.»547.63 649.68 228.15 0*.«1.*97.1«6,648.24120.00 240.00 75.00 105.00 195.00 15.00 210.no 75.00 135.00 105.00 1,350.0025.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 ».oo 25.00 275.00101. W 307.05 381.11 4l6.«3,007.86 507.63 884.68 528.15 1*0.00 1,027.10 B,2n.H1122222209If016571311459790 185.00 W.ai 714.86 666.03 5.551.09 847.63 2,162.43 5U.60T .05 Z.37!TTI 0,646.10 >• ■ PERMITS ISSUED/FBES COLLECTEDOATt or lUM 12/02/13 NOVEMBER 1993rt»MIT TYFCBall4lRfSOL rAMlLV-NCWSY-AOO/RCMOOCL?S;{?S«SSgiIRST-AOO/tENOOCLOlMO-ACchsotT ^C/QAKAOes S«b-total Mtchanical HCATINO STSTOW air COMDITIONIMQrmtriAci VfWTILATlOIK OA$ LIMC msrtCT DUCT WORK ONLY RC^C OIL TANK Sub-tRtal riMHibinf FIXTURES SRRINKLER WATER METER Sub-total Sowor A Wat or SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION 5|W SEPTIC SVSTE SEWER A WATER Sub-total Slfit TEMPORARY Sub-total Utor OofinoA LAND ALTERATION TREE REMOVAL LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Qraid-total • 0 4 1 13* 1 !• 2 1 3 6* •2** PfRNIT ISStXO REPORT CITY OF ORONO-- CURRENT RAIKH - It/Ol/tl - ll/30/t3OTYBASE FEE•7.923 50It1.994.5000.0000.0000.0000.001129.0000.003477.0021*10,121.00* ii 979.2500.003 Am 105.002 0m 70.003105.003 0m 109.00270.0029*1,335.25* IT 1.771.41135.002219.0020*2.022.41* 210.00 0.00 400.00 70.00 750.00* 30.00 30.00* 100.00 35.00 105.00 240 00* VALUATION PLAN REVIEW1.737.741.0« 144.lit.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0011,000 00 0.00 . 43.370.00 l.f3t.250.00* •0.700.00 0.00 2.100 00 2.150 00 1.I25 00 S.«20 00 .,1.150 00 75.145.00* I37.21f 55 150.00 <00.00 137,160.55* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* f .015 <42 0 0 0 0 0 0 310 •.237. 30010000000000 00 05 43* OTT40 1 1 30* RfOofSTiR: Parole *-- PREVIOUS RANGE - I1/01/S2 - ll/3Q/t2fASC FEE•i.224 00 S.OSb.OO 117.00 50 00 135 00 4.273 50 0 00 30 00 252 00 II.140.50* VALUATION PLAJi REVIEWi.too.200 00 720.190 00 1.120 00 ^ 0 00 12.000 00 1.3M.077 00 0 00 0 00 . .25.000 00 3.130,017.00* 14.49I.I9** 2.149,381.55** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 1 70 • 45 00 45.00 225 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 to 0 00 • 0 00 30.00 0.00 0.00o.oo O.QO*24*0. oo 1.005.00*0.00 0.00 • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* B 0 0 §• 111.00 0.00 0.00 111.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 00 C.00 0.00 0 00 0 00* 1 1 1 0 3* 30.00 30.00 100.00 0.00 180 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00*0 0*0.00 0.00*0.00 0.00* 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 3 0 0 3* 150.00 0.00 0.00 150.CO* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 7.43**•9**K.273.50**3.630,017.00** 4.045 3.13971.,»?!0 0.00 . 193.90 10.290.53* • 2S3OS007S7« 00 0 0 0 0o 0 O 00 00 00 0000 00 00 0.00* 0.000.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 10.290.53** V. PEJWITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1993PERMIT FIE CITY OF tl/Oi/93W V 11 * ▼ fDATE Of RUN 12/03/93 fMcm * • * • •ORONOTO 11/30/93 PAGt: 1REQUESTER: CAROL!•BUlLOTia MECHANICAL ^LUMIW SEWER A WATER USER SIGN FIREBASE FEE 10.121.00 1.33S29 2.023 41 750 00 240.60 30.00 Q.QO) PLAN REVIEW 9,237 43 0.00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 Q.QOI SURCHARGE 999.90 39.44 9S.99 9.SO 2.00 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.QO SAC 2.290.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q.QO 0.00 0.00 SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION MAIL IN 19.777.50 1.977.00 11.00 $ ii 3.00 PERMIT TOTAL 40.231.73 1.392.99 2,094.07 759.so 245.00 30.00 0.00 REPORT NBR. tFCERRTl-1 DATE Of RUN 12/03/93 ■•••• riRMIT FEE REPORT ......... CITY OF ORONO FROH 11/01/93 TO 11/30/93 . PAGE: 34RrOUCSTER: CARQU REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION MAIL IN ^ERHIT TOTAL 14.491.90 9,237.43 1,092.42 0.00 2.250.00 0.00 0.00 19,777.50 1.977.00 29.99 44.749.99 THU. DEC 2. 1993. 4:21 PMPEPMITS ISSUED FOP THE MOUTH OP pm 1NOVEMBER 1993KtMITWORKADDRBL012725013237012107011180Cl100001745021700 02 133 02 3265 02 125 03 2650 04 3264 04 90 05 740 OS 55 11 3655 11 1355 11 500 11 2180 11 2840 11 460 24 2055 24 847 29 22592925 29 3593 26C 26C ME 01 760 01 2523 01 1135 01 4105 01 4515 01 350 01 1100 01 4105 01 760 01 905 02 1100 02 1520 02 1501 02 2675 02 3145 02 3450 03 430 24 425 24 1040 24 3520 24 3265 24 325 29 2665 29 475 29 507 29 525 ISSUED PCtMlT mi ID NUMBER CQNRANT OMiCR LAST fM VALUATIONll«770«f tOLYM P»OfE»TltS INC BECKCP 210.000 0000000000NASUDLAK110.000 0014735435STCIMCR AKO^rCLMAN, ISC 42S.000 00U7S2622JAMES W BRUCE HOMES FBGFBPCTSOII 350.000 0000000000MCLAMCO2RR.500 0014724721RVC HOMES ANDCPSOB 233.2S1 0019722716HIRSCH AL COSST OWfNS 22.000 00 i;3S2018 GIF COSSTRUCTION STEWAPT 1.500 0018931450METRO BUILD-TECH INC MCDOHALD 11.000 0000000000HOP HEP H.200 0016584253MARV OHM CONSTRUCTION ANDEPSOM 30.000 OU*0000000 BOPUM 10.370 000000000THOMPSON13.000 0044709759FASTCKK JOHN UPIN •.700 00 00000000 PEPKINS 20.000 0000000000HAOAN2.000 0014733347FLYMOOTH ROOfINO S.300.0015571678RIGHT WAY ROOFING LAINQ 2.800 0000000000COPELAND1.100 00 17852919 DONAHUE CONSTRUCTION 11.000 0017227129GARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO GAGE 3.t«3 0015468160TWIN CITY STORM SASH CO AHDEPSOli 2.200 0015442817NEW ROOMS A SFACES COLLINS 450 0000000000SCHAFEP200.0000000000SPENCCP2.000.0000000000PADFOPD4.000.00 35378491 SURERlOR CCNITR IfC BPOWr^E 700.0039414211KLEVE HTQ A AC BENSON 1.000.00 39414211 KLEVE HTQ A AC 18,000.00 38886333 KEY METAL CRAFT 10,000.0035880791TWIN CITY FIREPLACE 1.300.0034972661DJ'S HTQ A AC s.soo.oo00000000KINGMAN400.0035453797M H SEIFERT CONST 1.200.0027397766NORDWALL K A ASSOC THOMAS S.000.0054734361JOHNSON JERRY EXC MCDOWELL 1.200.0035421166FLARE HTQ A AC KINGMAN 150.0034730450TRIPLE D HTQ A AC KIPCHNEP •00.0038819000SEDGWICK HTQ A AC CO SCHAPEP i.eso.oo 39296767 VOGT FRED A CO SLOCUM 950.0034282826PRACTICAL SYSTEMS SWENDENBOPQ 700.00 34345225 NORSEMAN PLBQ ENQLEP 3.120.0034789558DITTER INC HENDEPSON •,000.00 00000000 JANES BOO.00 37295646 TEAM MECHANICAL. INC.HOLCOMBE 4,000.0039296767VOGT FRED A CO YOUNG 2.100.0039203800CRONSTROMS HTQ A AC INC MCDONALD 2.700.00 00000000 GPOHBERG 1,200.00 34782452 SCHERBER A SONS INC SMOOT 650.0034432819NARKIE HTQ A AC INC FISHER 1,900.0038736209KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST BECKER 2.000.00 24775505 K A K HTQ A PLBQ. INC ODEN 525.00 WHITE OAK CItCASCO cmSUQAIWOOD DP TOKKAWA PDOLD CPYSTAL BAY ID S OPCHAPD PK PD BOHMS PT PD CHEVY CHASE DP BOHNS PT LA SMITH AVE FOX ST NOPTH SHOPE DP MYPTLEWOOD PD TONKAWA PD LANDMAPK DR NOPTH SHOPE DP BPOWN PD S OPONO ORCHARD RD S KENWOOD WAY NOPTH SHOPE DP TONKAWA PD SPATES AVE TONKAWA PD SHADYWOOD PD OPONO ORCHARD PD H CPYSTAL PL BROWN RD S KELLY AVE HERITAGE LA BAYSIDE RD WOLVERTON PL NORTH ARM LA KNOLL MANOR PD BAYSIDE RD DICKEY LAKE DR FERNDALE PD W KNOLL MANOR RD BOHNS PT RD BAY PIDQF RD FOX ST NORTH SHORE DR BIRCH LA WAKEFIELD RD OLD CRYSTAL BAY PD N LOMA LINDA AVE WATERTOWN RD BOHNS PT LA WILLOW DR N MAPLERIDGE LA OXFORD RD FERNDALE RD N TONKAWA RD 93/U/Ol OP 93/11/02 OP 93/11/03 OP 93/11/09 OP 93/11/10 OP 93/11/15 OP 93/11/10 OP 93/11/02 OP 93/11/15 OP 93/11/11 OP 93/11/15 OP 93/11/02 OP 93/11/10 OP 93/11/01 OP 93/11/15 OP 93/11/02 OP 93/11/02 OP 93/11/02 OP 93/11/09 OP 93/11/16 OP 93/11/30 OP 93/11/02 OP 93/11/12 OP 93/11/05 OR 93/11/22 OP 93/11/24 OP •005671•005690•005711-005722-005725-005746-005626 -005695 -005745 -0C5754 -005710 -005707 -005730 -005624 -005737 -005691 -005694 -005705 -005724 -005741 -005717 -005704 -005736 -005716 -005764 -005774 93/11/02 OP 93/11/02 OR 93/11/02 OP 93/11/15 OP 93/11/17 OP 93/11/17 OP 93/11/li OP 93/11/22 OR 93/11/23 OR 93/11/29 OP 93/11/03 OR 93/11/05 OR 93/11/17 OP 93/11/17 OR 93/11/22 OP 93/11/22 OP 93/11/03 OP 93/11/02 OP 93/11/01 OP 93/11/01 OR 93/11/15 OR 93/11/16 OR 93/11/01 OP 93/11/02 OR 93/11/02 OR 93/11/23 OR -005692 •005701 -005702 -005739 •005750 -005751 -005756 -005762 •005773 -005780 -005709 -005715 -005752 -005753 -005763 -005765 -005712 -005703 -005720 -005721 -005738 -005747 -005689 -005696 -005706 -005769 THU. OCC 2. Iti3, «:2t mHRMITS ISSUCO rOR THf MONTH Of NOVEMBER 1993 RCRMIT WORK AOOR Mfi* STREET RAOE 2ISSUED•CtMlT Mt 10 IRMSR com AMY OWNER LAST m VAIUATX(»13/11/10 OR-005731 24701201 STEINRRAUS RIBG INC NORWOOD 1.200.00tJ/ll/IO Ot*OOS732 29335838 DUDA LEON NLUMilNQ SEIV MCCOURT 190.0013/11/10 OR-009733 24277MO LARSM PLBG INC WIRTJES 0.OBI.99 93/11/10 M-OOS734 24277880 LARSON PLBQ INC WIRTJCS .00 •3/il/lS 0t-00574i 38825847 CAM HTO A AIR OP lUPPALO ROOD 13,700.00 93/11/19 OR >009743 28883057 SOUTHTCMN PIKS 14.700 00 93/11/19 OR-005744 27839080 PLUMBING SERVICES INC COHEN 17,994 00 93/11/11 OR-009749 24720909 ALS MASTER PL1R«INQ SAWICKI •00 00 •3/li/lt 0«-0057S7 24791942 OOLDCR PLM A HTO VOGT •.290.00•3/li/ll Oft-OOS7«0 29828415 0AM MECHANICAL SAMS •.040.00 •3/11/22 0R-0097S1 24733S90 SCMMIT STEVE PL80 ZOSCHKE 1,430 00 • 3/U/23 OH-OOS7II 24775505 RAN HTO A PLBG, INC PAIRISM 2,290 00 13/11/23 on-005770 29332521 THOMPSON PLM 14,900 00 •3/11/30 OH-005715 28532218 B K PLM A HTO •.I9«.00 •3/11/01 OH-005717 24775505 K A K HTO A PLM, INC HOLM 4.000.00 •3/11/01 0t-0057ii 24725920 OLSON LARRV PRUETER 3,100 00 93/11/30 Ot-005714 29332138 DOUGS PLUMBIM STEWART • 99 00 93/11/23 0ll-0057f7 24749207 GEZEL DENNIS PLM BOWMAN 9,000.00 •3/11/09 OH-005714 27883951 ORABOW PLUMBING INC HENDERSON 10,000.00 93/U/lS M-00S742 29337200 CULLIQAN MAOtE 1.000 00 93/1V29 01-005711 00000000 WEAR •Oa•3/11/01 01-005111 54718151 PETERSON ELMER J CO ANDERSON .00 93/11/09 01-005723 54734300 SULLIVAN'S SERVICES IM .00 93/11/10 01-005728 24481495 WIOMER INC BOTLAN .00 93/11/10 01-005727 24481495 WIDMCR INC LEHMEYER .00 •3/11/10 01-005721 24481495 WIDMER INC GEORGE .00 •3/11/10 01-005721 24481495 WIDMER INC NYHAMMER .00 •3/11/17 01-005755 54734300 SULLIVAN'S SERVICES INC .00 •3/11/17 01-005758 25334357 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING .00 •3/11/11 01-005759 24722318 COPPIN PLBG JACOBS .00 •3/11/24 01-005775 24724959 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS .00 •3/11/24 01-005778 24724959 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS .00 •3/11/24 01-005777 54481495 WIDMER BROS INC LAUCR .00 •3/11/24 01-005779 54775077 QUICKWAY EXCAVATIM .00 • •3/11/02 01-005700 88334510 ALBRECHT IRRIGATION DIV JUNOT .00 •3/11/05 01-005713 87392088 VALLEY CREEK IRRIGATION MESHBESHER .00 •3/11/12 01-005735 85480438 GREENKEEPER INC rox .00 •3/11/23 01-005771 89411131 HOLASEK DEAN MCCOURT .00 93/11/29 01-005712 ooooopoo WEAR .00 •3/11/02 01-005899 oooooooo LARSON .00 26C 2SCRL01 1209 LAKEVIEW AVC0110WILLOW OR S013237CASCO CIR 01 3237 CASCO CIR 01 3280 NAVARRE LA 01 921 NORTH STREAM RD 01 4109 6AYSIDE RD 01 4910 NORTH S)«)RE DR 01 155 WEAR LA N 01 1153 LOMA LINDA AVC 01 2040 SHAOYWOOO RO 01 1995 WEST FARM RO 01 2107 SUQARWOOO DR 01 180 WEAR LA 02 525 TONKAWA RO 02 3215 CRYSTAL bay RO 02 133 CHEVY CHASE DR NORTH SHORE'OR03 3458 24 430 WAKEFIELD RO 24 730 MAIN ST20C20C SI !•2180 UAVZATA BLVD 1C 1C sw 01 745 ORCHARD PK RO 01 4105 BAYSIOE RD 01 3240 BAYSIOE RD 01 320 CRCSTVIEW AVC 01 495 OXFORD RO 01 3280 BAYSIOE RO 01 2107 SUGARWOOO OR 01 2009 SUOAMWCXX) Dt 01 1075 MILLSTOM 90 01 1000 OLD C9YSTAI BAY 01 1000 OLD C9YSTAL BAY 01 970 TONKAWA 90 01 521 N09TH ST9CAM ID13C13C UD 01 1400 B9ACKETTS POINT 01 2010 SUQA9W00D 09 01 2730 9AINEY ID 01 10 WILLOW 09 S 19 2160 WAYZATA BLVD 22 3790 SH09ELINE 09•c 6C RO RO Ss 92C 2.149.3S1.5S* 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 99 9999 WM TYPE CODE Resid«nc« Addition Garago/Attached Garag«/D«tached Porch Dock F«nca Gazebo Pool Re-side Re-roof Tennis Court Sign Dock ShedDemo-Principal Structure Demo-Accessory Structure Move Comercial Institutional Storm Damage Repair 1-100 Cubic Yards 101 Cubic Yards or More Undefined 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 LCXJIL USB CODES Undefined Replacing Existing lifting Principal Residenco Kell Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renova t e/R emod e1 Accessory Structure Stairvay to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal OCC 10. 1113, 4;20 mWUHERICAL LISTING NOVEMBER 1993 PMt I........................comjmr mm vALiuTioli25"1;255?5 N t4o tomkawa to .........................—-.........................................-OR-C05624OR-OOS424011-005671 OA-0056M OA-005669 OK-00S690 OR-OOS691 OR-OOS662 OR-005664 OM-005695 OK-OOS699 OR-005699 0«-005700 OA-005701 0«-005702 OA-005703 09-005704 09-005705 09-005706 09-005707 09-005709 09-005710 09-005711 09-005712 09-005713 09-005714 09-005715 09-005716 09-005717 09-005711 09-005720 09-005721 09-005722 09-005723 09-005724 09-005725 09-005728 09-005727 09-005721 09-005729 09-005730 09-005731 09-005732 09-005733 09-005734 09-005735 09-005736 09-005737 09-005736 09-005739 09-005741 09-005742 09-005743 09-005744 •3/11/01 M •3/11/10 N 93/11/01 N 93/11/01 N 93/11/01 N •3/11/02 N 93/11/02 N •3/11/02 N 93/11/02 N •3/11/02 N •3/11/02 N •3/11/02 N •3/11/02 N •3/11/02 N •3/11/02 N 93/11/02 N 93/11/02 N 93/11/02 N 93/11/02 N •3/11/02 N •3/11/03 N •3/11/15 M 93/11/03 N 93/11/03 N 93/11/05 N 93/11/05 N 93/11/05 N •j/11/05 N •3/11/06 N 93/11/01 N 93/11/09 N 93/11/01 N •3/11/09 N 93/11/09 N 03/11/09 N 93/11/10 N 93/11/10 N 93/11/10 N 93/11/10 N 93/11/10 N 93/11/10 N •3/11/10 N •3/11/10 N •3/11/10 N 93/11/10 N 93/11/12 N 93/11/12 N 93/11/15 N 93/11/15 N 93/11/15 N 93/11/15 N 93/11/15 N 93/11/15 N 93/11/15 N 740 TOIfKAUA RO1700 tOHMS 9T »t>2725 WMITI OAK CXt 745 ORCHARD RK RD 2665 MARUERIOGE LA 3237 CASCO CIR 3655 NORTH SHORE OR 790 RROWN RO S 1355 IROWN RO S 133 CHEVY CHASE OR 475 OXFORD RO 3790 SHORELINE OR 1400 •RACKETTS ROINT 2523 KELLY AVE 1135 HERITAGE LA HK O*-® CRYSTAL iAY2055 SPATES AVE 500 OROMO ORCHARD RO 9 507 FERNOALE RO N 3284 NORTH SHORE DR 1100 KNOLL MANOR RD 2650 FOX ST 2107 SUQARWOOO OR 430 WAKEFIELD RO 2010 SUOARWOOO OR 430 WAKEFIELD RO 1520 BOHNS PT RD 2259 SHAOYWOOD RO 525 TONKAWR RO 3215 CRYSTAL BAY RO 1040 LOMA LINDA AVE 3520 WATERTOWN RO 1110 TONKAWA RO 4105 BAYSIDE RD 2160 KENWOOD WAY 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD 3240 BAYSIDE RD 320 CRESTVIEW AVE 495 OXFORD RD 3290 BAYSIDE RD 90 MYRTLEWOOO RD 1205 LAKEVIEW AVE 10 WILLOW DR S 3237 CASCO CIR 3237 CASCO CIR 2730 RAINEY RO 947 TONKAWA RD 55 LANDMARK DR 3265 BOHNS PT LA 4105 BAYSIDE RD 3290 NAVARRE LA 730 MAIN ST 521 NORTH STREAM RD 4105 BAYSIDE RD 05 1470975902 19722716 01 19677069 01 54719151 29 34712452 01 oooooooo 11 oooooooo01 35379491 11 14733397 02 1!352018 29 34432919 22 oooooooo •O 01 ••334510 01 39414211 01 39414211 RD N 24 OOOOOOOO . 24 15469160 S 11 15579679 29 39736209 04 OOOOOOOO 02 35421166 03 16594253 01 14735435 03 34799559 01 97392066 24 27963951 02 34730450 29 OOOOOOOO 02 24775505 02 24725920 24 37295646 24 39296767 01 14752622 01 54734300 11 OOOOOOOO 01 oooooooo 01 24461495 01 24461495 01 24461495 01 24461495 04 OOOOOOOO 01 24701206 01 29335636 01 24277690 01 24277690 01 85460436 24 15442817 05 OOOOOOOO 24 39203800 01 38886333 01 36825947 24 29337200 01 28663057 01 27839080 PASTOCK JOHN HIRSCH AC CONST ROLYN PROPERTIES INC PETERSON ELMER J CO SCHCRBER A SONS INC SUPERIOR CONTR INC PLYMOUTH ROOFING QIP CONSTRUCTION NARKIE HTG A AC INC ALBRECHT IRRIGATION DIV KLCVE HTG A AC KLCVE HTG A AC TWIN CITY STORM SASH CO RIGHT WAY ROOfINQ KLUVER MECHANICAL CONST FLARE HTG A AC MARV OHM CONSTRUCTION VALLEY CREEK IRRIGATION GRABOW PLUMBING INC TRIPLE 0 HTG A AC K A K HTO A PLBQ. INC OLSON LARRY TEAM MECHANICAL. IW. VOGT FRED A CO JAMES W BRUCE HOMES SULLIVAN S SERVICES INC WIOMER INC WIDMER INC WIOMER INC WIDMER INC STEINKRAUS PLBG INC PUOA LEON PLUMBING SERV LARSON PLBG INC LARSON PLBG INC GREENKEEPER INC NEW ROOMS A SPACES CRONSTROHS HTG A AC INC KEY METAL CRAFT CAM HTG A AIR OF BUFFALO CULLIGAN SOUTHTOWN PLBG PLUMBING SERVICES INC UP IN OMENS BECKER ANDERSON SMOOT NASIEOLAK HAGAN BROWNE STEWART FISHER LARSON JUNOT BENSON JAMES ANDERSON LAINQ BECKER NORUM KINGMAN ANDERSON HENDERSON MESHBESHER HENDERSON KIRCHNER SCHAFERHOLM PRUETER HOLCOMBE YOUNG CNQEBRETSON COPELAND MELAMED BOYLAN LEHMEYER GEORGE NYHAMHER THOMPSON HOPWOOO MCCOURT WIRTJES WIRTJES FOX COLLINS PERKINS MCDONALD ROOD MAGEE COHEN • .700 22,000 280,000 00 00 00 00 00650 _ 110.000.00 2,000.00 700.00 5.300.00 1.500.00 1.900.00 .00 .00 1,000.00 19.000. 00 •00.00 2.200.00 2.too.00 2,000 00 10.370.00 150.00 20.000 00 425.000 00 1,000.00 .00 10.000. 00 800 00 200 00 4.000. 00 3.900.00 4.000. 00 2,100 00 350.000 00 00 00 00 00 .00 .00 .00 13.000. 00 •.200.00 150.00 •,091.55 .00 .00 450.00 20.000. 00 2.700.00 10,000.00 13 700.00 1,-00.00 14.700.00 17.594.00 1,100 269,500 FRI. OCC 10. nil. 4:20 RHWUMIRICAL LISTimS NOVEMBER 1933 RCRHIT NB* ISSUED CANCEL A008 RACE 2OR-005745CM-OOS74SOR-005747OR-OOS74SOA-005749OR-005750OR-00575108-005752OA-OOS7S308-00575408-00575508-00575S08-005757 08-005751 08-005759 08-005760 08-005761 08-005762 08-005763 08-005764 08-005765 08-005767 08-005766 08-005769 08-005770 08-005771 08-005773 08-005774 08-005775 08-005776 08-005777 08-005779 08-005760 08-005761 08-005762 08-005764 08-005765 08-005767 92C 93/11/15 » 93/11/15 N 93/11/16 93/11/16 93/11/16 93/11/17 N 93/11/17 N 93/11/17 63/11/17 *3/11/16 93/11/17 93/11/17 93/11/16 93/11/16 93/11/16 93/11/16 93/11/22 93/11/22 *3/11/22 *3/11/22 *3/11/22 93/11/23 *3/11/23 *3/11/23 *3/11/23 *3/11/23 N 93/11/23 N 93/11/24 N *3/11/24 93/11/24 93/11/24 93/11/24 *3/11/29 *3/11/29 *3/11/29 93/11/30 93/11/30 N *3/11/30 N HB8 ST8ECT ID *t»«E8 C0M8ANVNNNNNN N N N N N N N H N N N N N N N N N N N N LARDD8083265 iOHNS AT LA745 08CHA8D AK 80325 WILLOW 09 N2140 NORTH SHORE 084510 NORTH SHORE 084515 WOLVERTON AL350 NORTH ARM1501 BAY RIDGE2*75 roK ST125 SMITH AVE2107 SUGA8W000200* SUGARWOCC155 WEAR LA N 1100 KNOLL MANOR 80 1075 MILLSTON RO 1153 LOMA LINDA AVE 2040 SHAOYWOOD 80 4105 BAYSIDE RD 3145 NORTH SHORE DR 25.« 080N0 ORCHARD 80 N3450 BIRCH LA 3459 NORTH SHORE DR 1995 WEST FARM RO 525 TONKAWA RO 2107 SU0A8W00D DR ^0 WILLOW 08 S 760 DICKEY LAKE 08 3593 CRYSTAL AL J225 CRYSTAL 8AY 80 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY 80 970 TONKAWA RO 521 NORTH STREAM RO 905 FERNOALE RD W2160 WAVZATA BLVD 2160 WAYZATA BLVD 133 CHEVY CHASE OR 160 WEAR LA 460 TONKAWA RD OWNtB LAST NM VALUATION16931450011472472124000000001117652919012472060501356607910134972661023661900002362967670200000000015473430001253343570124791942 01 00000000 01 2472231601266264150124733610 01 35453797 02 342626262f00000000 02 343452250324749207 01 24775505 29 24775505012*332521 01 1*411131 01 27397766 29 00000000S 01 24724*5* S 01 247249590154461495 01 54775077 01 5473436119000000001900000000 02 29332936 01 26532218111722712* ME’RO BUILD-TECH IHC 8 VC HOMESDONAHUE CONSTRUCTION als master alumbinqTWIN CITY FIRtALACE DJ S HTQ A AC SEDGWICK HTG 4 AC CO VOGT FRED 4 COSULLIVAN S SERVICES INC ALYMOUTH ALUMBINQ DOLOER ALBG A HTG CL/AAIN ALBG DAM MECHANICAL SCHMIT STEVE ALBO M N SEIFERT CONST ARACTICAL SYSTEMS NORSEMAN ALBG 6CZEL DENNIS ALBG K A K HTG A ALBG. INC K A K HTG A ALSO. INC: THOMASON ALBG HOLASEK DEAN NORDWALL K A ASSOC WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS WIOMER BROS INC OUICKWAY EXCAVATING JOHNSON JERRY EXC DOUGS ALUMBINQ B K ALBG A HTG OARLOCK FRECH ROOFING CO MCDONALDAWERSONCfiONSERQSAWICKISCHAAERSLOCUMHORNER VOGT KINGMAN JACOBS SAMS ZOSCHKE SWEN0EN6ORQ SACNCER CNGLER BOWMAN AARRISH ODEN MCCOURT THOMAS RADFORD LAUER MCDOWELLWEAR WEAR STEWART GAGE 32.000.00233.2*1 1.200 11,000 • 00 1.300 5,500 1.950 *50 .. 21.200.00 .0000000000000000CO 9.250 400 00 00 00 00 00 00 1,090 9.430 _ 1.200 00 700 00 2,000 3,120 5.000 2.250 525 14,500 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5.000. 00 4.000. 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,200.00 .00 .00 955.00 t,659.00 9.••9.00 ZONING PERMITS ISSUED/FEES COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1993RtPdllT Ntt. BP«MTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 12/03/93PERMIT TYPE DtltltdCriRd'total OTY00‘0*«'• PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY Of ORONO-• CURRENT RAfMlE - 11/01/931 * 11/30/93RASE FEE 0.000.00*O.OO'*VALUATION 0 000.00*0.00*»PLAN REVIEW 0 000.00«O.OO**OTY00*PAQE; 1REQUESTER: CAROU-- PREVIOUS RANGE - 11/01/92 - 11/30/92RASE FEEo.co 0 00* 0.00**VALUATION0.000.00*0.00**PLAN REVIEW 0.000.00*0.00‘« REPORT NRR RFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12/03/93 BASE FEE USER 0.00 RCPOIIT TOTAL 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.00 0 00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 •• PERMIT FEE REPORT •*CITY OF ORONOFROM 11/01/93 TO 11/30/93 RtQuimi*®cAtoit ^ Mound Volunteer ^4^ SbepoAtmeni, 9uc. 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound. Minnesota 55364 Dec^rfjer 13, 1993 City of Ororro P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay,55323 Dear Mayor and City Council, I want to inform you that Steve Erickson will be Mounds Fire Chief, starting January 1, 199A. I’m retiring as Fire Chief December 31st, of this year. I will be staying on for a few months to assist the new chief get established with our program. But I Just really want to thank you for your support and help these past nine years while I was Mounds Fire Chief. Its truly been an honor repres^tir^ all the Cities that we cover. You help make the department what it Is, \mich is the best! Our firefighters are dedicated and very well trained and take pride in their success here at Mound Fire Department. If you have any questions, contact Steve or contact Judy at the fire station. She will be continuing working part time as the fire departnsnts secretary. Diank you again for helping me have a wonderful nine years as Fire Chief and one year as Asst. Fire Chief. Don Bryce Mound Fire Chief DB/jb Ij : n DEC 1 4 1995' cm OF ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING THURSDAY. JANUARY 6, 1»4 7:15 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS ATTENDANCE AGENDA 1. Approval of Minutes of December 6. 1993 Meeting. 2. Review cf Schedule of Meetings for 1994. 3. Consideration of Planning Process for 1994 (John Shardlow) 4. Park Commission Agenda for 1994. 5. Reports on Skating Rink Monitoring. 6.Preparation for February 7ih Public Meeting at which Old Crystal Bay Site will be Discussed with Input from Neighbors. Review of Map Requested from City Staff. 7. Review of Preliminary Plat Plan for Dickey/CofTin Development ADJOURNMENT DRAFT MTOn^ OF THE PARK CO.MMISSION MEETLSC OK DECEMBER P. IPPJ attendance The Pick ConuniaioQ me. on the ibove date wi* me follow,^ n«mben Flto. Rohen Howells. Susan WUson. LUi McMUlin. Stefokee Use airi Ve^ Vonenes was absent Public Works Director John Gethardson and Recorder Lm Vee represented City statf. Chair Flint called the tnectmf to order at 7:35 p m. (,?1) a\PPROVAL OF MLM jTES Wilson requested that ’ Page 5 Lowrv Wood be changed to Lowry Woods. She il^ noted ih^ shJ had not referenced a news anicle but that it had been Howells and asked that ihc names be changed. McMillan asked iboui the charse for tide insurance. Gerhardson responded that it was a cost m Onino and is standard procriure. Costs to the Cits' include tmnster ot ^ Conservancy to the Citv of Orono. review by the City Anoniey and filing costs The Phase I Envtronmenul Study has yet to be done which involves some staff time but was not pan of the costs previously discussed and approved. For future reference. Chair Flmt felt if there were City legal fees involv^. those fees should not be paid out of the Park Fund while a contrary argument could be made from pure accounimg theory, lie felt that these were operating costs which should be paid out ot current operatmg funds. White asked at what point the City assumed responsibility for any problems on the Gerhardson responded that if any problems were discovered the title ^ completion of the Phase I Study, the Nature Conservancy would be informed. The Pt^c 1 Study is basically a history of the property from the neighbors or others tamiliar with the property. W’ilson asked that the nature and amount of the costs charged to Park Dedication fees be stated in the minutes. White requested that on page 3. the sentence "White suggested that a combination of uses for the park systems be established." be changed to read "White suggested that a ^'onibmaiion ot uses within the park svstem be established. " It was moved by Howells, seconded by McMillan, to approve the -mended minutes of the November 1. 1993 Park Commission meetmg. Ayes b. nays 0. (#2) UPDATE ON DICKEY DEVELOPMENT - To be discussed later draft MD.XTES OF THE PARK CODflSSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1993 C#3) DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEY FORMS FOR CITY ICE RINKS (McMILLAN) McMillan distnbuicd forms to monitor use of the ice rinks ^.hich will be done periodically dunnsj the season. Monitoring will be doce by the following: , ^ Jim White - Casco Point Skating Rink Alex Vongrics - Roberta Lee .An'oinc Skating Rink Lili McMillan - Hackberry Park Sherokec Use - Bederwood Park All Park members were urged to review any or all of these skating rinks when they are in the vicinity during the winter. Members decided to review these repoats monthly at the scheduled Park Commission meeting. (#4) UPDATE ON BIKE/HIKE TRAIL - To be discussed later (#5) UPDATE ON OLD CRYSTAL BAY SITE (McMILLAN) McMillan reponed that the City Council gave their approval to proceed with the development of this site brgetting ideas from the residents. The Council should be updated on the progress of the plans. McMillan suagested the Park Commission schedule a public meeting vs. a public hewing in February to get further input from the neighborhood. Randi Carlson has been the neighborhood f^rcsent^tive on the sub-conunittcc. McMillan thought a letter should be sent to tht neighborhood residents in early Jmuary •iforming them of the upcoming public meeting so they can be prepared with ^eir ideas for the site The meeting should be held at the new Council Chambers. She asked it the idea of dosing Prospect Avenue should be stated in the letter. Others agreed this could be mcluded in the letter. Chair Flint asked about the idea of selling off one of the plats. McMUlan felt there were too many unknowns with the soil contamination and decision of what to be done with the Council Chambers. At this time, only ideas should be contributed about Parcels A and B, not C. It was decided that the public meeting would be held at the February 7 Park Commission meeting. 2 DRAFT MCSXTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 19^3 UPDATE ON OLD CRYS TAL BAY SHE - CONT. White »skcd v-hv the old City Hill was not considered as a ^ led that residents wanted the Post Office to remain and the old CouncU Chamben did not have plumbing, etc. to make it a feasible use. Geri.,.':--on presemed i diignm ot dtt OW Crysul Biy s.tt showin* Parcels A. B and C. included in the letter. Hc*eUs requested a map with the actual dimensions of the parcels. Wilson asked that the map include properties to the south as well. WTiite felt some fuidclines should also be included in the letter such as leaving existing mture r^rw^lre^sSlfa “have them indteated on the map. The well should also he noted even though it is iK>t in use and the plan is to cap it. McMillan asked about electrical outlets. Gerhardson stated there was electridiy to the well so something should be able to be worked out with the control box. Howells asked if there were other utilities on Prospect. Gerhardson explained there was underground telephone service but no sewer or water in this area. Wilson suggested McMillan draft a letter and then have it reviewed by the sub-comimttee Ctatr Flint guarded against be.ng too specific since he felt this was an oppottumiy for cmaens to state thetr views rather than react to a Park Commission proposal. Howells asked about the distribution of this letter. Gerhardson stated there were 80 -100 homes to which the letter would be mailed. Wilson suggested Rindi Carlson be the contact person, if she were agreeable, ‘f residents were unable to aLnd the meeting and wanted to leave written or verbal it would be bener to address comments to the Park Commission through LUi McMillan, % C ty Hall. Wilson noted that the Park Commission is not looking for a fuU proposal from the residents but rather general comments. The next step will be to bring these comments to the sub-committe for further discussion. draft MINUTES OF THE P.\RK CO>»USSION MEETLNG OF DECEMBER 6. 1»»3 CHANGE OF MEETING DATE Because of vanoua conflicis, i. was decided .0 change te January meeting m Tlmraday. January 6 at 7:15 p.m. Howells will be unable to attend. (#2) UPDATE ON DICKEY DEYELOPMENT Gerhardson reponed that tS: developer, had indicated >>*7 iTI^ todK Park Commisston. Planning Commission and Council. White asked if the sale of the property was contingent upm the approv al of the subdivision. 0«!r Flint felt normally there would be such a conttngency. regardmg this property. Gerhardson resj»i^ Commission. He thought Council had ^rT. rr orw^TnTr~g ^t mt dtvolved and leaving r-egulat.on of the wetl^to^ other agencies. Two acre lots are being proposed. nan reponed that she had a “no^lvter^^^^^^ “r-Xe Th" a Native American history with walking paths native plants :::rpVes‘berh^e" pLe, to Pjay a.id P'-"-7,^ me bam had to be removed and '^j'm^the te Th^Tw^ uLm what "rLis slipponive of an interpretive center, then she would talk to some families for private donations. 1 j K fhA nrinrities were of the Park Commission - with the bike trails or rr!^ia; fa^d^ Chair Flin. respomied the tesolut.on -s pa^ vnd. room for Lth concerns, i.e.. the acreage for park purposes was enough to provide tor bo . Gerhardson confirmed that he would be sure the Dickey's were sent a copy of the resolution that was passed by the Park Commission in November. drar MCSXTES OF THE P.\RK COLMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1993 (#4) UPDATE ON BIKE/HIKE TRAIL (FLINT/CITY STAFF) Gaffton prepared a loporaphy map of the proposed traU. Maps «-ere riso availabk from Hennepin Parks. Members reviewed these maps. Chaii nim suted -JM Cit> Adnmmiritor Moocst i^iml of would be willing to consider o»her comdors in the western part of the City ^sides ^ .u^eedv dcsigMKd bv Honooptn Podcs The respome Moor« go. to, Hennepm would be willing to consider another comdor m the western pan ot the City. Gerhardson explained that the western path going south to the Luce Line is laid edge of several private propemes. Topography changes can be as much as 1 1 reet withm a shon distance presenting some difficulties with gnde. Wilson expressed her conoem for property owners who miy not warn w have triil users ulonf their property. White questioned plans for future development in the area. Wilson asked what the downsides ot this proposed trail in western Orono would be. Members 1. This is not where the majority of the people arc. Old Cry stal Bay Road is a location which would better serve our people. 2. It goes through pnvatc property involvmg property owner ’s rights. 3. Some elevation changes may be as much as 11 feet. 4. Drainage problems with putting asphalt on the trail. Other possible locations in western Orono were also discussed. O^ possibihty ’ would to follow McCulley Road from Highway 12 to the Luce Line where Hennepin County Highway Department already has proposed a trail. Gerhardson noted the possibility of a parking lot on City' property off of McCulley Road. The DNR is also interested in buying a piece of the property held by the City for parking. Members discussed the memo from City Administrator Moorsc regarding the Old Crystal Bay Road Bike/Hike Trail. The major disadvantage of Option #2 is that Orono would pay all the costs for construction. WUson asked the meaning of "phase in the remainder as easements become available" in Option ft3. White felt it mean,, diat if there was any development in the five year period, the City could fak-ff casements as part of the Park dedication. DRAFT MEVLTES OF THE PARK CO>DUSSION NtEETC^iG OF DECEMBER 6, 1993 UPDATE ON BEKE/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. Chair Fliat did oot think Option ^ would be less expensive because it would require more expense to the City and wouW not connect to Baker Park. Chair Flint recommended approval of the conceptual proposal from Hennepin Parks m their letter of October 29. 1993 and that it be brouglM to City CouncU. The motion was secondc y White. This proposal is similar to Option #3 in Ron Moorsc s letter. While expressed his opinion that there was not enough support for the Old Crv stal Bay Road trail even though he favored this route. They may have to look at airotlar option. M''Millan reviewed the proposal from Hennepin Parks stating that Hennepin Parks would build the trail from Baker Park to Old Crystal Bay Road aiKl pay 100% of that cost. ^ City splits the cost with them for the route down Old Crystal Bay Road or Hen^pm Par^ builds a traU further west at their cost. She felt a r-commendaiion to Council would have to be more specific. W'hite fell this was a step towards getting a trail. Wilson disagreed. She fell this was political and buying tunc for Hennepin County so they could get what thev want. She would be more supportive if she knew the property owners were m fgreement. Drainage concerns also exist. She favors staying with the Old Crystal Bay Road trail as previously proposed. Use asked if the proposal could be approved with the possibility of alternative routes such as the McCulley corridor. She views the proposal differently than Wilson. She feels Brysmt is working towards a proposal that is flexible enough to work with to gain approval with the Council. The Park Commission has already been working on this tor 2 1/2 years which shows their commitment to a trail. McMillan expressed her concern over having a five year legal agreement because the Council could change as well as other things. Chair Flint suggested an amendment to his motion if Wilson were in agreement to a change stating the traU would not have to be m the Orchard Park corridor but could be in another corridor Wilson objected stating there was not enough information on optional corridors. McMillan also expressed concern over publicity without having property owners fully informed. Chair Flint felt the five year time frame was an advantage because it gave tne City lime to smdy development. Wilson felt Hennepin County was xr/ing to "tie" the City into an agreement but Chair Flint explained that after the meeting with Hennepin County, the letter could have been written by either Doug Bryant or Ron iMoorse because there was agreement about the proposed plans. DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 6 1993 UPDATE BIKE/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. in a timely manner to the Couiay. There WM discussion about ttktng out the reference to the -Oretari Pirk' corridor and mseninj ^mutll^lv "^n ues^corridor-. Chau Flint r»red dtese were st.ll concepnrel p.ans Wilson asked if the City was required to enter into a formal agreement with Hennepin County. ChLr Rini responded that the City would have to enter into an agreement before any money would be spent. Wilson reiterated her unwillmgness to send this proposal to the City Council for approval at this time. She felt more information was needed about alternative routes and property owners s ou be contacted. White suied there would never be 100% approval for the location of a n»il. from the CouncU or the public. Howells suggested indicating to CouncU and Hennepin Porks that then main objective is to develop a trail and to continue work on possible comdors. Chair Flint felt the previou meetings have indicated this objective. McMillan noted there should be a response to the letter. Chair Flint was in favor of the five year time frame with modifications that a spccitic western corridor is not designated. MCsMUlan noted that the Orchard Park corridor looks closer to Baker Park than McCulley Ro?-l. She secs this corridor as only connecting Baker Park to the Luce Line whereas the Old Crysta Bav Road corridor is more of a "City traU" connecting the ball fields and schools. Any coaidor west of Old Crystal Bay Road only serves Hennepin Park’s purpose to connect Baker Park to the Luce Line. White stated that although Hennepin Parks would get what they wanted, it would be the first nnk to a trail in Orono. Use noted that Hennepin Parks is also making a commitment to Orono because otherwise they could spend their money in other 3xc*is. DRAFT NIESXTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1993 UPDATE ON BIia:/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. McMillan «kBl how »on H»n«p.n P«ta would do the ■ spU:e- on responded ii would depend on how won the le*alit.es were ^n care of. There ^ ^ diSssion about consmicaon in the sprtn, The City would be responsible for the trad ram County Road 6 to Hiahway 12 and would cost approximately 580.000. An easement would be feTu^SedCn Mr^ Nhs. Otten and from the School D.sa ot. Credit would be ,.ven agatnst future park fees due on subdivision of the property. Howells asked what o*er experiences Hennepin Parks has unth traUs. White re^^ tl^ are trails past Lvman Lodge from Hopkins to Victoru. from Hopkins to Slukopee. and p^^l STshiopee to Cannon Falls. These traUs are very popular but momes are very limited in Scott County. Howells moved to amend the ongmal motion to include altemattve routes that would be mutal^ accepuble m ihe western portion of the City of Otono. It was seconded by Use Ayes 4. nays 2. Wilson and sVIcMillan were opposed. The question was called on the principal motion. Ayes 4, nays 2. Wilson and Mc.MiUan were opposed. NEW BUSINESS The overall park plan was discussed. Chair Flint suggested having someone who is familiar with the Citv and has worked with parks to make suggestions about park possibilities such as Jo Shirdiow. Steve JonrgSton with Loucks. or Wenck and Associates. Wilson thought the Park Commission had to ciscuss the overall principles that are important to the City. Chair Flint thought a park planner could be of help with the process of how to go about developing an overall pail: plan. He suggested inviting Shardlow to the January meeting to give a brief overview of costs, time iVamc, types of paiks. etc. to include in a park plan. McMUIan asked how difficult it would be to determine the easements and park dedication lands taken when subdivisions have occurred. Gerhardson replied that the easements would show on the plats out there is not a master list. These could be discussed further with Jeanne Mabusth. Gerhardson stated he would research this funher. White asked for information on tlje parks from the Comp Plan and rules for the Park Commission from the ordinances. Wilson requested a copy of the Park Dedication Fund budget. Howells requested a copy of the Financial Statement from the Golf Course. DRAFT MESXTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETTNO OF DECEMBER 6, 1993 adjournment It «as moved by Wilson, seconded by McMillin. to adjourn the meetinj of the Park COTunission at 9:59 p.m. Ayes 6. nays 0. Richard N. Flint. Chair Person I 3490 Lanftoi A«mi Nortik SLPniMH$Smi044 Leape of Minnesota Cities (sis^oaeoo December 23, 1993 TO; FROM: Mayors, Managen, Clerks James F. Miller, Executive Director lrn<P r~ - JI“ »-Sr ^ 1994 NXC CongFessional-City Conference DEC 3 0 1995 Regli^ration andi roiifereoce prognun Enclosed is a program brochure and regiftration for the 1994 NLC Congressional-City Conference, to be held in Washington. D.C., on March 12-15. City officials arc encouraged to attend and take part in developing an action plan to gain support for the critical budget and policy issues facing cities during the 103rd Congress. On Tbesdav. March 15. the League will also coordinate meetings on Capitol Hill with members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation during which we will discuss priorities for our cities. The deadline for advance registration is Friday, February 11. After that date, on-site registration will be necessary. In early January, LMC will send out travel service info maf ion. Denning Mihni»ota1citfoFaHion Minnesota city officials have identified five is.«ues as the most imponai.t for the League to address in 1994: crime and violence, current and prospective mandates, health care, welfare reform, and housing and community development The LMC Federal Legislative Committee has also recommended policies on telecommunications and national health care reform. The NLC Board of Directors, on which Millie MacLeod (Councilmember, Moorhead) serves, will adopt a ’94 Action Agenda early next year, defining major legislative and policy development oriorities for the nation ’s cities. In advance of the formal adoption of that plan, Minnesota city officials need to define our priorities and address those at the NLC Congressional-City Conference, where the work program and direction for NLC policy will be determined. LMC also will focus on meeting with Minnesota congressmen and senators to talk directly with each of them about the impact of federal policies at the local level. This is youi chance to participate in setting that agend a and discussing our priorities for congressional action directly with members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation. Enclosure 'ANNUAL' *CONFERENCE* lASmXGTON HUOyHOm AND Toms* M.AKU 1215.1994 • «ASinNCTO\ D.C NATIONAIUAGUE OF ariES n a ^ ZtH^ Iy 5- I ^ "i M IIijH ♦ S — i aa <y it =“ i r 2^ r i i-T i s D;? 5 ? i 5 ?- ?>! m«* c jr u s^7 f ^ ? a 5 5 1?| - o yi^Lr>s « a si «c rrr* =a 2 “ a 3 C" «i ♦ ? X r. -□ t ^ =5 ?- = 3 a 3L. ; i[t;X s T ? ? r 11^ 1 g s c r?- •~. »~ <r*“ 2I"-1 5 “* =• ii^Iti illm I If t ? X I. £5- ii 5:-;^ ?T| ^ - r 5 ? - 2.^ ■C ^ c i. ^ i I" ? ! ’ 1 ; ! ? £l * 'fat 'll I i -I ■=1 II ij it ff ii ~ 3 H ■2 I Htv< II 2 a -I a I 5?r Hi ii r §l5-3 = _ “ i I 5^1 :£ i c ,:^5 IsHlSSl'fails.I 5^3-11 2:1 p2t ? 5- sl‘^le,i4iq23S=’'S-Si.is 5 Sa» 1-5 o§ sS ? > I S s I 2 ° 5 »g. ««•5 »Q arsassi? HI If iHlis 5 lirE.a'S 3 <^5 = i? Pi <s I § Jsjisii-l-f c *-♦ Q. ST ST ^ S- ™ -«-'- 5 aj o ? w f? --w 2 =i s* ^3 =r o a == 3 ^oi.i^ETg- ^ “ o o ?S ^|ipli^!i s 2.3 sJ 5 3 -7 ?? S t; C.7O ^ q — 2- 3iinis-£g 3 = a 5 " 9 9 ,-= a'i.'T? lillllfiif J5’§ gip S ;« g i I ^ g.^ i. s S. -g. 2CL 3. §v> ,:p ^ ^ ^ o ?? o I'M p ^ p » r 222-1 ?_gItiH! §r i^i .— ?? i?:*^ c- mmmmm ll-is3 »-> 3 r: -, ^ 3 5 rd d =s ? ^ i " V r-. P‘ i 2-iL5- .g 03 3 2 - '•. ^ j , ■* w — . sJ. 3 o1.?-2SS1.3B.3 H s.§ § o 9 ^ § S.o c o ?? - S'^ 5^2. ^ ^ o' &-3 oS-S 2 =• 5 o S’ §■ a 3 5 1.5 g 3 H. r3 5 «; H ^ o' ^ 2i. rt S a-D 5 “Cl- ^ cr ,_ —g £ 5 ^ g 3 ^ •g o " £ 5 2 ^ C3 C C — r-i 3 3 £j-0 sr ^g-'cx S' o =- 5 a,.,5 s 3 ^ S ri 'rz rz i3 Q to. 'S C 3 3 5 >t -S-S-t; ? s r ~ d- 3 - w ^ =2S §. O 3 2 C- 3 cr. ^ rD ^Sl« l-2-i ^ § ^ § => o a B. 3. 3“p (T, c/> u* ni ^ o 5 i “ q w -Z ?3 7 5 -15 sf.g^ E 0 S - — ? - £i, 0 3 ^ 7^-5. S 7 •3' 3 ^II 3 ^ o ^ ^ w 3 ^--59- § 3 S ^ ^ - 3_ __ v» ^ r3 o c w S 5 3-2 3 3 3 2 ?=i' t S' B 2 = s “ ^ i0 g I 3 5 ^ w £ii §1 - a. El • ^ Q in " C 3 I 1 c Dl -2 o si §9-^ 1-1. a 5^ 3 Tp O O CO rz O oro O ^ C- —I O^ 3 3 ^ i' o % 3 i A fi' ’L« »Hir 1 1 :'s ^ ^i ^ 3 § "1=i' <' 5 ?5 ? ^ 2T ' ^ "* 3 'a ^ 1«•' e i^ 4J i g- ^ 1 5 £ 1 2?- £ ^ •» 2 SS 3 :t| 3i|i ^ s-g 2S- ~i ^£2 S.J sr =r -I ^ ?s ! ?! ? S' ^ ^1 S'? t/" 3?-tS I • i - if § f: “" a» 3 ^1^7 5 I i * £ "3 s-’; j r|51 r * ■ # »3=5 - 5^ j I 15 3^1 *• ' i. r S « » * ^ - i ^51 ill i I » Iff ??l tfi J II £ £I 5 J I-1 1'^ S.^ S ia s f if 13^3? ■? rt- is i,5-1 ?-j : ^ =* iv w "3 IIliir ? S.S J '» , ^ E I Jl- B •“ S ^rill HI i?IPH iiieHIlIjs Ifllll 5"a £ T # £ Ismail s feS-Slyf ^ 5--- 15 i I ^ iJ ii. -s g-a “ ■3 {y = I s ? nIf III » « T % >• i a 4^ ri 1 i E 9 I aft s « ^ '73 £ 3 r SB 3 3 5 I i3»§1 ii? § liplllf 13 3 if I liHffillfip?SSre.g ’s2a 5. ^ g f 5 a S T3h "aas:55s '*- !• ? 5 f * 1 « *■3 • 5 I ; i I 5 I I r s f = - 5 5 H 5 I S s iriirji 3F tU!i f3 S I li ^ . a*f ■? nil S.I g ^ ij ijii 5 11. m S.2" i 1 J 2 — s zj ^-is -5|2P| via ----- £. £- 0 srJj BJ S 2 ^ 3 I£i i a ; 5 11 - '«nnfillI i^ s. X !Z _nii i a i 3Hu HI! 5 -I 'il 12*1 5T 3 S S Hii‘WrIfils g llllfS g “ 5 5 S' 2 ■'= 3 5 >0 2Q sH tI ■M'ifli'5 i;2 ? -53 ‘-3'- y ^ - 3 *^ =. fe ^Ei =i* *3 3-.3 ? ^ — 2 X 5 ^ 1 ^ ^ *3ZT 111.1 ihihi m3 1125^ li IS*? k? < *i C* S""2 2 xH If ? 2 1?-I - c §- •■ - y *2-5-1 3 * i S i S ^ - -> s 5 ^ 4 3 ^ 7 5 j i.-^. a-=i:l5'i|'3-23 ■tffHiuntjiiiif 7ii t aii^ it- = tt. E 5:5 Oi £• ^ it- Sg-2.!; =.= * 5 S’ L 3 -. -^- Z—>”2:dfii ic3§i^a s ci|s U 5 =L ;r « ^ ^ i jf T ^ i S f £ -3 -■24 5 5’ SL ^ 5-= - S i * S3ss^c:32»-'* C •- ^ * 2.1si ? andFAX UHir ftMTrt to (703) 318-7368.El r I I I ★ Registfraiion F orm ★ Wl IHT •* _________________________________________________________________■ liik.____________ < .«¥ «* < Hmm/.anin. V\ M F NLutiiiK t il%. Mjli U k |7*ii ---------------------------------'■■ ■ - ■■ 1 .mMK AmiulMi* iNi» spi HIM- I iiH N wi*' ------------------------- < ii*i^_____________________________________________-------------------------------- u«u_____________________ --------- iG n«is IV nn Im «< «'■•'•'••wnK 2 □ I am m In .4fn<* S {J I «utukl likr ira%d as^ni ini v lnnn i .rca^o Tra\H Im rh,\bi^phui*^0>ttfvntHr ftr lUht vtthr ih tt*,- rrttht /vi»n/ liJnmti Am.vNCJ. Kr.si RV\noM Fi is ( ", i.»M> l>iio! Itv* i * <js‘> \sv4nrni MiiuUfltt* j 1 AkiiiUi i\ N"»rMMni»t !*• liH U miMT- SridAI. lATM^ f ; % sumlav t tUI m iii* Uuakf.iM «1MC; D«t^ f J S \S Dm *.! Muni n r D«k > U ' »> N«»n !\k nilvr I Hu s [1 S HI saiuntiv I nmlHsin V\ M F IJADIRsnir |R\IMN<. INMin IF M MIN\KS i ua v\v MAiu ii n !.l A'm U SIJA t jlk-UkxMi'n IJ $ "A lUiiiu: vuul V' mkiiu* w Mil .1 Vu 1 M\ M n» iwHf r ] STS I’r.u IH li Mfauuu-s l« m mmiiK N * miM a>i rise's l>4iii{ DuiM«r.KV ! Mi/rii I'aiiM H’aiinii I ] S HI ( n iuruj I V\»mM I lavs Im iJ I iiRHMm SAII KDAS MAK! II 12 LJ A|JS i rv.iinr l'r«nn «n' 1***^ '‘•'kt < mu *n t j SI2A RuMalt/nie KdMiiklHiif Ruir'\hhi ^< »iv I I 5 "S M.Nkmv lik\mdv 'vm Iihi j ( ii\ Ijmmui I { j S *S \\iiultni: flu* Films li.ip ‘ ] S 7S ilu Kiu Ih I'miiiU (Huitiiimm ' I t ““S u« -iiiiHl N* 's I rivin « *|^s««iiiwih’s TOIAI. S s s“ 5 S^ < s s s, s s' s’ S IIOTTI. AuDMMOmnONA RISLRVAIION R|(>» I-ST rk*a>i !\pt* Mf |An«D □ IVim- m.ikr im IhmH n-M-n ,n«»n is iiulu.iHsI K lim ! (In jhM ixs(iiik* In Mi l mnnMiHsl ilums M .im *«l iK' luMds li>iul lu kmr O Pk is4* iiu- n cmlinti '»«•*»■ infnnii.ilHin r?l I |uiSu .1 irnoMiH kiin* n«HH usmijius I nil .i '^vui* .naialik* basisl «!■ 1*1 HnuiMiHsUv \iuii s|u.si.il mitls , v\lHvkli;m Kiissilik- 63 niiHiis iik iM* iiHHail IK ( nnluuui Ri u'J* “mhi i inui _ ___ Spi ual 11« si>ini* K( «|»ii >4 __________________________ _____ \rm il I Viit' IH'|iailuK' d'K* t«ne_ I inu' Riiini Hi K '•hansJ isHh Ciu i*rr C\Ri) .‘\mn>Ri/AiioN LJ llufRi* im nuisifjiinii li'i' iN isa *M M.i'diit afil *Mik • iJnl CJ I Kmui - im l•lM«^ ns*m iKis»sii uR iiuim inilH lanK anq^oli laixlH < aiil < niiHA im---------------------------- --------------- ( ani NiiiiRut_____________________________________ ■ ■»- F\|ur HHm Daiir __________________ . ----- Can I IFkli f si>!n.niifv____________________________________ D.rti_________________________________________________ Tl» Ml I ••M.tinir •*«Muis*i‘«toc Hu- * Ji*l R* |».n Jk j|y^ d4- wnrUr l,«il,iNL..«l*K*.toi ••%.4»*R**"*lu««r»d^ls'h«P(| *!«• «4(li Mito • ««*ld I ItdH' 4»*<» tm »»*Ksni»lb*i'«i8**iMr «**M«fwnl*4m MiA-^llvUconulkAl ,m I. - •' «•« >• ••• *!• bul <t Ii jM »H w »iI» ••* lloin PlUTIRIM K , , lin. n. «•<» IH'I***^* (.ul^Rlnb mnidsd .Hm U#tK toln <4 HIM > m«bto4 «iib KMI.SIMI M*! Ud MK« n «ld'dK% u M« i«s H ** aiOICE IIOTTI SIMiLE IX)CBU HanI ’ki V^adiinunm llniil lAI MIS SllS IHi|«mm Pla/a lliMcl dll S|0S SI 111 j lllluss\ Kin\ llnirl U )SMil SISII rmKass\ SniK-s 1 liMrl d)i SIW sii*; hflltain lliulilaiul d)SMH SISH !,kialiiv Ik Mil i ifHial d 1 Sim Sim slutaliHl Mashimtinfi Ud SifHit limit SI2S SI2S Ikjnhtun limit siss SISS Mlashmtfiim lijlnn IkMd dll SUN Sla9 T•n\ll^s:m S22»l « ,Tm V.;»/^ *.•lll•r» *«l. Imn * imrl U •»d«imUslli»H«-Jn’^i*ulr |» «. n«N ■ M11 kS •• *K N« I 4iiiiid<|jN M*l m '•d^n s. din (b bu! •I In Mil liv S'^S iHil I rlwn.nv 11 1*"^ *•» hi Mir Its S u'S illi i li lmi.iiA’ M I'l'ii R immu in .f»U nukr dusk |tn.il4i l.*f il« Mbsim ‘-I lU ndMiinui* n-uNf.ibsi In-s In N\nON\| IJ.M.I FOI ( IIII.H M |M\inii In irnirt i .iril iiR isil llu ! ua IM < ai«l Aiilbwi/.HiiSi (shii.hi .4 this lidiii * (umi-llHinn klUfs iiiuM In pi*Miiwfknl 1*1 lil*ri.ir\ II I'MIi * All (.iim‘U.i( mils jrv Mdsi-n i**.i S V) i im i’il.ii»i«o lit* * Nn i('li-|4Mmt ’ ni' *1 • .inn ll.ibui' 'vill lu* .Kii'lUnl t*V m »<*'«•« >b' '•••• iitttdi «•■•* |»*innt* •» SU < >«ii« ui«t iix*W* **»•• I M«l1 I* I) bm CiD Ihiik'i hdiiiuipml lui*"! n (Uwiirinn IMI .'•bl Uiur*ai ^ Ai tar Nkl ji itir H •*l»*m*« M^«i n'dH Mml l»mi-n ■"I CffV ■* ft— -iraae. DEC 3 0 1983 December 28, 1993 Mayor Edward Callahan, Jr. Orono City Office P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Callahani This letter Is to inform you that Washington Scientific Industries, Inc. has recently experienced a mass lay-off. This lay-off was due to unexpected schedule reductions by two of our major customers. The facility affected is located at 2605 West Wayzata Blvd., Long Lake, MN 55356 The names, positions affected and effective dates are noted on the attachment. If you have any questions concerning this lay-off, please contact j Terry J. Blount Washington Scientific Industries, 2605 West Wayzata Blvd. Long Lake, MN 55356 (612) 473-1271 Inc. 'erry J. BQ.ount Vice President - Human Resources /ea attachment WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. 2605 W Wavzata Blvd • Bo« 340 • Long Lake Minnesota 55356-0340 • Phone 612/473-1271 Name Job Title Eff.Date DesJardins, Anthony Kope, Ronald Lundqulst, Kathleen Quanrud, Larry Ralche, Michael Schultz, James Vassar, Philip General Prod.Supv. Manager Estimating Accts.Payable Tech. Director Sales Ct Mrkt. Plant Manager L.L. SPC Coordinator Quality Engineer 12-17-93 12.17-93 12-19-93 12.17-93 12-17-93 02-25-94 02-25-94 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 E. Hayzat* Blvd., Suit* 160, Wayzata, UN SS39I 473-7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE JANUARY, 1994 Saturday Monday 8 Hater Structur** Committ** 7:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata Wednesday Monday Friday Wednesday Friday 10 Lake Use 4 Recreation Committee 5:30 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Lake Access Committee 7:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata 12 Administrative Committee 7:00 pra, LMCD Ofice, Wayzata 17 Martin Luther King Jr. Day Office Closed 21 Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30 am, #135 Nocweit Bank Bldg, Wayzata 26 LMCD Board of Directors Regular Meeting 7:30 pm. Tonka Bay City Hall 20 Mayors Quarterly Meeting 7:00 am, LaFayette Club DEC 3 0 1993 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. LAJie MXHKETOHKK CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE AGENDA 7:30 AM, Saturday, January 8, 1994 Norwest Bank Bldg, 900 E Wayzata Blvd, Rm 135 (Elevator handicapped access at west entrance, Wayzata Blvd) Maple Forest Addition New Multiple Dock License application, Minnetrista, West Upper Lake; review of revised site plan for 8 slip dock Stead Variance application, 21600 Fairview street, Greenwo^, Lower Lake South; Review of draft Findings & Order approving variance Michael Revier Variance application, 2691 Ethel Ave, Orono, Carmans Bay; Review of draft Findings fc Order approving variance Cochrane's Marina New Multiple Dock License application, 21900 Mtka Blvd., Greenwood, Excelsior Bay; proposal to use transient slip #11 for storage of a charter boat, and eliminating storage slip #22 Excel Marina New Multiple Dock License application, 141 Minnetonka Blvd, Excelsior, St. Alban’s Bay; submittal of new site plan for minor changes - withdrawal of application for reconfiguration of entire dock ^ City of Excelsior Mew Multiple Dock ;,icense application, to relocate two slips from Lafayette Ave. to Hidden Lane PoxhiU Ho»«oin..rx Xxxoc. H«« Multipl. Dock Lic.n.o oppUe.tloB, 1801 Shoreline Drive, Orono, Smiths Bay; new site Pl®" ulth changes, for 9 of 13 licensed siips, slip 1 designed to be 32- with a 40' canopy 8. Methodist Lakeside Assembly New multiple Dock License appliw^^ 17700 Front St, Woodland, Wayzata Bay; minor ^ ° slips from east side of dock to wast side to meet 30 setback 9. sandy Beach Place, 3995 North Shore Drive, Orono, West to correct site plan, changing two slip widths from P previous site plan 10. Schmitt Marina, 701 Minnetonka Blvd., Excelsior, Excelsior Bay; request to amend site plan changing two slip 38' as reconstructed per original site plan, and req the stipulation for fencing on the south side of .... removed, and subject to an as-built survey being submitted 11. Ordinance relating to Storage of Unrestricted Watercraft, revi- second reading as amended 12. "Envelope concept" for multiple dock licenses, feasibility discussion 6. 7. 13. Additional business ITEM1o «i (9 Mapi« Fords! Adcfllon > 6^^'* (^ -3at -------- UJ aiirlloiiiiiilEiiiaiiJ M 4 • » #•.1 v; e* STAFF MEMO; Applicint wtll submit revised pl*o l/8/'‘A to reflett dock distance from shore to be 16' to hortiontal walkway upon depth reading rcvie*^ tor dock pljcem^nt. DEC 29 1993 I r Shoreline — ^00 In V^^-■ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT In Re: Application for Variances of Gale and Jelmie Stead n CTN. The applicants In this <»se. Gale and J^nie Stead, are the owners of property located at 21600 Fsurview Street, Greenwood, Minnesota. The property is located on the south lower lake, and is legally described as Lots 175 and 166 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 141 . The applicants have requested variances to the dock use area of the subject property as well as setback and length variances to aUow construction and maintenance of a dock. The hearing for the variances was held on Wednesday, October 27, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. at the Tonka Bay city hall. The subject property is a pie-shaped lot with lot lines which are converging M the takeshore. The property Ues at a point of lakeshore which is concave from the lake. The subject property has approximately 66 feet of lakeshore at elevation 9S9.4 feet NGVD. The basis claimed for the variances requested is the hardship imposed by the combined effect of converging lot lines and shallow water. Even when the lake U at the ordinary high water level, the water depth at the apex of the triangular dock use area is only 24 inches; and the depth at the apex of the extended lot lines is only 36 inches. The subject property was previously granted a variance which involved the adjustment of dock use areas of the subject property and several other adjacent properties in periods of low water. That variance was granted by the board by order dated Mav 7? » 1991. The variance requested would not interfere with or require adjustment of either of the adjacent dock use areas. The board finds that the hardships presented consUtute a hardship within the meaning of LMCD code section 1.07 and that granting the variance requested, with CLL63115 LKllO-4 the conditions hereinafter set forth, is consistent with the spirit and intent of the LMCD Code of Ordinances. ON THE BASIS OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That the variance requested is hereby granted subject to the following conditions and limitations: a. The dock use area shall be adjusted to be in conformance with the site plan dated October 4, 1993 attached hereto as Attach oent One and hereby made a part of this order. b. The dock use area for the subject property shall be that area which is shown with dashed lines on Attachment One. c The dock use area for the subject property shall not extend beyond the extended lot Une between the subject property and the adjacent property to the north. d. The dock constructed shall not extend more than 70 feet from the shore line at 929.4 NGVD. 2. This order does not supersede the order of . .^JY. ^2 ^ which Pi. .vMes for variances during years in which \he LMCD l^rd of directors has declared the existence of low water condiUons m accordance of LMCD code section 2.01, subd. 2(d). The variances authorized herein shall grant no vested rights to the use of Lake Minnetonka. Such use shaU remain at all times subject to regulation by the district to assure the public of reasonable and equitable access to the lake. By order of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors, this___day of_____________,f 1994. Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director CLL6311S LXllO-4 ATTACHMENT ONE lls*: to __\" 9 ^o’ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT In Re; Application of Michael D. Revier 3 The appUcant in this case is Michael D. Revier. Mr. Revier seeks a variance to adjust his dock use area to allow construction of a dock and storage of boats at the subject property which is located at 2691 Ethel Avenue in the city of Orono. The property is located on Carinans Bay • This case also involves several .Ijacent and nearby properties. From the north, the first of these properUes is louited at 2684 Casco Point Road and is owned byMr.andMrs. David Runkle (the "Runkle Site"). The next property is owned by Mr. Michael Revier, the appUcant in this case (the 'Revier Site ). The next property to the south is owned by Mr. C. Gordon Amundson, 2697 Ethel Avenue (the "Amundson Site”). To the south of the Amundson Site, is a parcel owned by Mr. R. Kauffmann at 2696 Ethel Avenue (the "Kauffmann Site”). The Revier Site has approximately 26 feet of shoreUne at the ordinary high water level. The hardship asserted by the appUcant for the variance requested is that the extended lot Unes of the Revier Site converge as they enter the Uke and do not aUow a dock use area of a reasonable size or shape for the storage of watercraft. The board finds that this fact does constitute a hardship within the meaning of LMCD code section 1.07. The owner of tne Revier Site has a deeded right to construct a dock and store boats on the Amundson Site which has 15 feet of shoreline. The Amundson Site, by itself. Is not sufficiently large to allow reasonable construction of a dock or boat storage. The board also finds that this constitutes a hardship within the meaning of LMCD Cv'de section 1.07. If the Revier and Amundson Sites are considered together, the combined site would have 41 feet of shoreUne. However, because of the converging lot Unes, there is not sufficient room for reasonable dockage and boat storage even if the two parcels CLL6320X LKllO-4 1 are combined; and the board finds that a hardship exists within the meaning of code 1.07 even if the two sites are considered as one. The owners of the Revier and Amundson Sites have agreed to combine their dock use areas and use their combined shoreline for a single common dock facility of sufficient size to allow each to store one watercraft. The board finds that the us proposed by the applicant and the owner of the Amundson Site is reasonable. Given 41 feet of shoreline, it is reasonable to expect to be able to store two boats along a straight dock, 40 feet In length, as proposed by the applicant. The board finds that it would be unreasonable to require conformance to the ordinance given the converging lot Unes which create a dock use area which is not sufficiently large, even by combining the two parcels, tor reasonable dockage or boat storage. The difficulty of conforming to the ordinance is due to circumstances which are unique to the property. It is not created by a desire of the appUcant , but rather results from the combination of the facts that the dock use area is defined under the LMCD code by reference to setbacks from lot lines extended into the lake and that the lot line extensions in this case converge as they enter the lake , resulting in a dock use area which is unreasonably small for 41 feet of shoreline. The owner of the Runkle property has objected to the granting of a variance on the ground, among others, that the hardship is created by the appUcant. Mr. Runkle asserts that the appUcant acquired his properly after the LMCD code was in effect and therefore the hardship is self created. The board finds that the hardship is not self created in any sense that would preclude the board from granting a variance in this case , as more fully explained in the attached memorandum which is hereby made a part of this order. CLL63201 LKllO-4 The board finds that the veuriances granted do not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed dock is in a residential area, and the nature and size of the proposed faciUty will not bo out of scale with other residential dock and boat storage along the shoreline. The Runkle and Kauffmann Sites each have approximately 100 feet of shoreline. Therefore, adding storage for two boats at the combined Revier and Amundson Sites will not create unreasonable congestion in the ar^* Mr. Runkle asserts thst s variance may not be granted to Mr. Revier which aUows him to instal. a dock or store boats on the Runkle side of the extended line between the Runkle and Revier Sites. This question is more fully addressed in the attached memorandum. For the reasons explained in the memorandum, the board makes no finding as to the respective real property interests of the owners of the Runkle and Revier Sites. Mr. Runkle stated that he would agree to a dock plan which would not involve crossing the extended lot Une between the Runkle and the Revier Sites. He argues that there is no hardship which justifies a variance adjusting this lot Une because a dock has been in place in the past which did not extend over the extended lot Une. It appears to be true that a dock has been constructed in the past at the Revier or Amundson Site which did not extend beyond the extended lot Une between the Runkle and Revier Sites. However, this dock was not in compliance with the requirements of the LMCD code and extended substantiaUy into the dock use area of the Kauffmann Site. Likewise, Mr. Runkle urges the board to adopt a plan agreed upon by Mr. Revier and Mr. Runkle in an attempt to resolve this issue through mediation. That agreement, however, aiso avoided crossing Mr. Runkie's extended lot line at the expense of the Kauffmann Site, and Mr. Kauffmann apparently declined to approve the proposed settlement. CLL63201 UUlO-4 The board finds that the proposals offered by Mr. Runkle would be unfair to the owner of the Kauffmann Site and that the variance hereinafter ^nted and ordered is a more reasonable, fair, and cquitablo allocation of dock rights to the parties involved. Finally, the board finds that the variances granted by this order do not adversely affect the purposes of the LMCD code of ordinances, the public health, safety, and welfare, or reasonable access to or use of the lake by the public or other riparian owners. ON THE BASIS OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS ORDERED that the dock us© areas be determined by reference to lot lines adjusted from the point at which the lot lines reach elevation 929.4 feet NGVD as follows: the lot line between the Runkle and Revier Sites is adjusted 25 degrees to the north; and the lot line between the Amundson and Kauffmann Sites is adjusted 25 degrees to the south. The variance hereby ordered is subject to the following conditions: 1. Nothing in this order is intended to encourage or require the the Revier or Amundson Sites to construct a dock over the extended lot line between the Revier and the Runkle Sites. 2. Nothing in this order in intended to be an adjudication of the respective real property rights associated with the Revier or the Runkle Sites or to confer upon the applicant any rights which violate real property rights of the owners of the Runkle Site, in excess of the authority ol the LMCD. 3. This order shall not be effective until the appUcant has recorded a copy of this order with Hennepin County against the title to both the Revier and the Amundson Sites, together with any such other documents as may be necessary to effect its recording, as approved by legal counsel to the district. The variance granted hereby shall authorize construction of only one straight dock at the combined shoreline of the Revier and Amund^n Site, and no dock may be constructed at either parcel pursuant to this variance without the consent of the owners of both parcels. 5. No more than two boats may be stored at the docks at the combined Revier and Amundson Sites, neither of which boats may have a beam in excess of 8 and 1/2 feet. 4. 0X63201 UUlO-4 6.The lenffth of th« dock constructed «t the Revier and Amundson Sites shaU not exceed 40 feet meesurwi from elevation 929.4 feet NGVD. 7.No canopies shall be constructed at the dock located at the Revier and Amundson Sites. 8.The dock located at the Revier and Amundson Sites shall n^ntain ft wtbftck on^ch side of at least 3 feet from the adjusted lot line. The variance authorised and ordered herein shall grant to vested right to the UM Of Lake Minnetonka. Suoh use .hall retnain at aU time, subject to regulation by U» district to assure the pubUc of reasonable and equitable access to the lake. By order of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors. this___day of , 1994. Eugene R. Strommen, hxecutive Director CLL63201 LXUO-4 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT In Re: Application of Michael Revier MEMORANDUM In the above referenced case, the owner of the property adjacent to the applicant’s parcel to the north, Mr. David Rxmkle, objected to the granUng of the variance for a number of reasons. The board has chosen to address two of those issues In this memorandum. The first of these arguments raised by Mr. Runkle is that the applicant does not have the legal right to construct the docks over the extended lot Une between the Revier and the Runkle properUes on land which is under water below the ordinary high water mark. Although land between the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) and the ordinary low water mark (OLWM) may be privately owned, the board is not aware that the OL..-M has ever been determined for Lake Minnetonka. Without such a dcterminaUoo, it would not be possible to evaluate the merits of Mr. Runkle's claim because the land below the OLWM is owned by the state of Minnesota and cannot be privately owned. Moreover, tht between the OHWM and OLWM, the use of private property is subject to reasonable regulation by pubUc authority. Whether aUocating lake access among riparian owners may constitute such reasonable regulaUon has not been determined. In any case, the board must decUne to decide the case on the basis of this claim for both legal and practical reasons. Legally, the board has no authority to adjudicate adverse claims to real property. Because the board has no legal authority, it would make Uttle sense as a practical matter tor the board to attempt to decide the issue on the basU of its opinion about real property interests of the parties. Any decision made on the basis of the board's findings on real property interests would properly be subject to challenge by either of the parties, and the board would be placed in the position of attempting to defend private real property rights of one citizen agains the adverse claims of another. 0X63160 LXllO-4 Such questions are better left to courts of competent jurisdiction in • legal action involving the interested parties should either party feel that it is appropriate or necessary to have their respective rights adjudicated. An additional claiin of Mr. Runkle which warrants separate comment in this Biemorandum is his assertion that the applicant cannot qualify for a variance because he acquired the property after the LMCD code provisions were in place. He argues, therefore, that the hardship is self-created. There is some precedent which is supportive of this position in land use law. However, there is also a good deal of precedent to the contrary. Under the LMCD code, the board is allocating among riparian owners dockage rights over the public waters. It is not regulating the use of private property under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, i 462.357, subd. 6 which applies to the granting of land use variances by cities. In many cases, the hardships or practical difficulties which are the basis for granting variances under LMCD Code Section 1.07 are simply tho result of the fact that the LMCD has chosen, as a matter of convenience, to use as a starting point for allocating dock rights anmngr riparian owners, an imaginary line created by extending the side property line into the lake on a straight line from the point at which it meets the OHWM. Over the years this has proven to work reasonably well in most cases. The obvious advantage of this convention is that the lot lines can be readily determined by survey. The determination of an authorized dock use area would be much more difficult if the board had decided to use some other convention such as a line perpendicular to the shoreline or a line extending to the center of the bay. However, the strict^ application of the code does not always result in a fair or reasonable allocation of dock rights or allow riparian owners reasonable access to the lake. Therefore, the board has found it appropriate to adjust dockage rights in such cases through the granting of *'variances'* from the provisions of the code. CU.63160 UUlO-4 Such questions sr« better left to courts of competent jurisdiction in a legal action involving the interested parties should either party feel that it is appropriate or necessary to have their respective rights adjudicated. An additional claim of Mr. Runkle which warrants separate comment in this memorandum is his assertion that the applicant cannot qualify for a variance because he acquired the property after the LMCD code provisions were in place. He argues, therefore, that the hardship is self-created. There Is some precedent which Is supportive of this position In land use law. However, there is also a good deal of precedent to the contrary. Under the LMCD code, the board is allocating among riparian owners dockage rights over the pubUc waters. It is not i-egulating the use of private property under the authority of Minnesota Statute, I 462.357, subd. 6 which appUes to the granting of land use variances by cities. In many cases, the hardships or practical difficulties which are the basis for granting variances under LMCD Code Section 1.07 are simply the result of the fact that the LMCD has chosen, as a matter of convenience, to use as a starting point for allocating dock rights among riparian owners, an imaginary Une created by extending the side property line into the lake on a straight line from the point at which it meets the OHWM. Over the years this has proven to work reasonably well in most cases. The obvious advantage of this convention is that the lot Unes can be readily determined by survey. The determination of an authorized dock use area would be much more difficult if the board had decided to use some other convention such as a Une perpendicular to the shoreUne or a Une extending to the center of the bay. However, the strict appUcation of the code does not always result in a fair or reasonable allocation of dock rights or allow riparian owners reasonable access to the lake. Therefore, the board has found it appropriate to adjust dockage rights m such cases through the granting of "variances” from the provisions of the code. 0X63 ICO UUlO-4 If there are hardships or practical difficulties relating to the dockage rights of a given parcel of riparian property and a variance is appropriate under the coda, the board does not feel that it is appropriate to refuse to gnmt reasonable dockage rights to that same peu^i merely on the ground that the ownership of the property hkM* changed hands. In other words, if granting a variance is appropriate under the facts of any gfiv ^ case on the day before a transfer of title, it will generally be appropriate on the day after title is transferred as well. The board has not declined to grant variances in the past on the ground that a transfer of title creates an improper "self-created** hardship, and it does not find that it is appropriate to do so in this case. CIXS3160 LUlO-4 COCHRANES' BOATYARD P O Bex 320 Excelsior. MN 55331-0320 (612)474 8813 November 0, 1993 it. 1 Cochrane*' Boatyard# Inc. 21900 Minnetonica Blvd. P.O. Box 320 Excelsior, W 55331-0320 Dear L.M.C.D. Board Members, would liKe to apply for a minor change on our multiple dock license renewal application. We are requesting that our transient slip # 11 be used as a charter boat dock, which as we understand is considered a public^Si^ityV^In changing this slip to charter boat use, we will be giving up a water storage unit # 22. we are reguesting this change to accommodate the lessee of our restaurant building. Renting this building is important to the survival of Cochranes' Boatyard, Inc. Thank you, and if there are any questions, please call me at 474-8813. Sincerely, 1 V Cyrus J. Cochrane, Jr. NOV 12 1393 1_M.C.D. ! * 0^ouNDAfiy • COCHRA /V/f 5-^ gO>4 T 'rj'in /Mf! '- ^ Mift -«r SCtiSnj^! ^AVSOAf INC. u / C////>5 COCHRANES: subject to Orders of 4-26-72, 9-28-78, and 2-28-79. 11 transient slips: no overnight boat parking <;:k- lo^2- 1 w f —-j •• r ** •9 • 9 1t •• 1 - * 4 1 /f - /(r o /f//— / .r^ A/*# //y /f/j- //rC?^^ //, 'b //r /fir? /f/f — m '0 *^C7\€k^ /999- 1991 ip, ff9Z /fA,i,T(7X»fi^') '?93 //ffi> »iT Ctl*fn^ • /c*i^ ^ I CURRENT SITE PLAN ur Ui “li )C X.::j vxiT ’ns*: o.' l"c»iir.r t\ r' ''f the ca*r. rort ‘ ir.d:. l i*:s ' */:n to t In lyTu/j and to iicat? ti (Ji'nc in the rrete^t :;»u~.r For purposes of t>»i« surre.-« »«•■» sild Lot 3 has boar, considjred th hsvo a 260 fset, at i to 'pnfor'* to tiis survey u Torrens procaevln/ for rsiiistrntlm of L •vuiavis.on . 5 Gordon ii. Ccfflr. Ho Ljnd Gui vcyor tr.i rla Lonf LaV", Mrr.asota I" = 5C 7-25-80 Iron nr ter Koi ’Vr cl»¥ohen c« 7 S? > f ifii • fyo 5 I £%ai I f»/n/9% j: Doc YeUiL Olab /r -vr .1/* ^Area 35 ,1 « •CITY OF EXCELSIOR S3» TMIPO STPfiT iXCCLStOM. MtNNfSOTA »U3t TCI.I: •12-4T«t2a) November 18, 1993 Rachel Thibault Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 East Wayzata Boulevard Suite 160 Wayzata. MN 55391 Dear Rachel, The following site maps show two minor changes. The first change is indicated at site #3, page 5 of 5. Two docks showing two water storage units have been removed. These two water storage units have been moved to site #2 shown on page 4 of 5. If you have any questions or need more information, please call me at 474-5233. Sincerely, uarl Ziernan, City l^ahager Sits: 3t I » § $ 9 i CITY OF EI xcelsior ^ X ^X' // /<?77 ^ I' I f r? § kkikh ^ t N/ -< vje" SIT[ 2 C^iTi 0/ £Vc^Ti^^ St 00 /^?>-C \ I w 4,J Ct \ ^ \ \ 1 —n St. Albans Eo' 3: Lviy/ t- -vy VISION N0.I20J T^to/i \t let tort, ont mtmo* II >//i i Addition to tho n'o p(3s«i/ 7 'r •1 I 4‘I '•*s#iiTd: .y ‘i~ ' %«*1 p»mf or 'r - , t * . > *<fO ^ ••'I i ^OAK MILL . < ^ CEMETERY \l |„p^^u 3rd ADO ! M \ Mllf < iAT*» :^,Pr \.f V =rf O f A' ^ in ADO. ! ST. |f*t it M • »•« <• A PS »«(♦<«•» «b ' ^ VH' V -i. ) r-’* • *••**•') iSfj i/rf ti;'-V.'Cc* ^ u*' %f •• vr. , |» m a* M« L’' I^S'M 1.0 S !H* ^k»»1 Kilt ..V ; “*•'’•■•' i 4. .i-n r»‘** .•• 1 j I ? 1. *L SV*0*:*:a -t I 3 A'JD lueD MO. 110 *»• i«t ft :::fr:£. SITE 3/Af'f 37 /f^y- it t I Si •n -i » » «•» ' 5*tJ Ji Zi» ^Vl f- -N » ^ I ' » ' ' ’ I |i5 idl? '^eserii' O X ti ?>#• »* w Sr. Albans r**. op»^ 5* A 7’'?^^ 1+ - *. «• vy f let tort/ oo* •1 • .3 I IV • AddtUon to tt>t No.120 I //\ .'/ / / ' _ •x>- '•— > » ■vrA'.W/XI'.i.. ^ -' •* -: iv /A'V '’*ay 1^/» \ \ • -'-^ C4 \ M \ M«r •• oie!^ M8 l>» i,.j”|\“y.|.- -£)AK mill ■ iCcMeuRT ;: 3r4A00. ■ ' O r 'lil ;v • - ^/A V {• -. s;i/ •♦v ./S:\ .\\ ^ -'i y* • • «r.;!r.AC*0 • ?•• 4 .•• y '*4 , .^' >- ----------- • ♦w' ^ ♦ A • ^ * « HOTi"'” 7^-;— -. • #• NW' lF«* JL** • ••• •* M y* .,.•***• «• »’ l'*,^ll**'* ^ i'-'.'rr'f _-»— •^ X '.: uml*- ' JCfTf* n Gideons E)3/_ yrP<iPinrf~ ----------------v ho X lull pocf—~pr ----------------------■*» Sc-c. t ■ /<!>' I . ^ DEC 11993 U.IVI.C.O. I JJ? t E -[ IT ] I 0i>f>/2, 3 ' • Zh 1 nr 9 crzn. I n a: tn H 1^ § •D tl O f V)> w z o -a • * C’J^rny /< FOXIIILL ASSOC lATlQII Lake Hii<^toak« Saith'v-'Bay 19S2 DOCK PLAH MAR U ]W object to: Agrecoent between ^xhlll Association and City of ceno of 6-12-79 and Lake Use icanse of A i H Anderson re use Z area within East A West exten- ions of Anderson property for ock use by Fcxhill Association Subject to Variance Order of 9/28/7i. Granting of slip relocation (#1) la specific to'this dock plan and continuing approval of neighbor to (.he vest. Any future aacndaent of the site plan will require reconslderatlc of the entire site plan. (Per Board action 3/25/92) l9iX ^li t> • • ♦ , • # 0 I ‘. • • • .r .'V/Vf / T ^ ^ -/2> \m SLULL / ^ a /o'///a f/mH. -T. >S>4€ATit• •NOV 2 9 1993 L.M.C.O. PROPOSED SITE PLAN ITEM B ^£7?tkiD/STWay Z. AT Ax5Ups /$: j: f(o3 -/y r ^^'K/o/9»*23c IfAT^ /OjiAO* ^OQR./t4(Z A/e£A6 MA^ ffP plACE^ /A/3tX>£ ^OCKS :t Vf 4 I? s5 W/Af I I I w4 —* ■<:/ 7 6PdP£ 3U0r.i sw'/Af 4 K- i>f^T£lcT MtfsAfN^ A£CAS >c. AI ?X 4. i__i 3 j • -» 13 /O />iJ^ /Jl r r' IlilU k4jTf/c r/CJ'/r V/7 T31D CjT~] ^asn ESS J VJ 10 o «) tl V H ft: OJ 30' ■/ ^ ^ ^ _/ ^ ^ fi. y\ vu. <• x^, a^uAcU^y^- t*-i a C clu Jlj (/Jjj^ ---------- ^ (Uyy^^^^eOl<iiyy^ <x^J >X.I^ c/a^^ <5^W. <lJ3«^<SU.^ .ruA^a.^^ ^/s . Oua/^juaM^C cU-civ //^''^ diMA 8/Wfa (A^jlC jL'-■v^''J^ ■'^ ^ ^ ^ ' xlZ^Xt^'vL iJLvv/'*-• ^ cvvixLZir /- ^ '^- o^f' /'A^/y. / xuidi . (si <y-^j^'ist ^^^vuSUF. CURRENTSITEPLAN 3<t(OStJL tr '' X « V ^ sf' '* >1 p s ^ AiJ METHODIST LAKESIIE ASSPffilTWATZATA BAT 1295u\Pb ‘. |*/2» in*yt/e' 13’ti * /^' }t/o' //vl^y r^oKiti^ »r a^£t r^At (.a //r9/tr £x?C<*c 0 (g) 1 t>isr£.icT C8 A/«3 0m, V-f, m.M % T • • 9 tjmffh Ls^Si S«€. iB-ttT 13 -#41^ “^^5----ZZ ~ 6A.04 »4«"«''ti'' AV \ ^ <<v- »)>^ £■««# f'*«« J L*t5 set :j V \ \ 'P' N c)m /»7>- - 7 Tv. I ' \ \ \ \ • 1^3-7 J> \ |»>(N -cS^'• c^\ 'V A \ \ / ’ % FEB 81992 l_**.CJ>. ? lace Doc K Plan IToveriber LU, 1993 Dugene Stroanen Director of LJI.C.D. Dear Sir: J-tr to Attached are the surveys of the laiad, docks ard ’lijh water level of Schmitt Karina showing the marina before an;' changes were made to the fingers going out from the main ual!n/ay due to ice damage, modification and configerations approved over the years. The main walk along the shor-line running north and south Is the original and has never been changed. The change in dock fingers going out into the laks are different from the ori-inal and slips 17 4 18 have been added to the end pe ’ aprjroval of the IllCD board and which you ha*e a copy in your file. I an requesting to leave the finger on slip 16 as is because it was an oversight when we made the changes last year. It would bo a financial hardship for another sui/ey and hope this is satisfactory with the lilCD director and board members. Thank You Schmitt Marina NOV 16 1993 1-M.C.D. roposed ^ :hange from 'tr • to 38* IS recon- (tructed DV 161993 • * STIPULATIONS; of 4/24/85: 1) No expansion of the dockefe will be allowed as a result of any dredging. 2) No additional dock Is allowed on the aou or on the channel.r on cne tuaim';*. The allpa are for rental use only by th. general public, not for brokerage or eal. 4) No canopies are permitted. 5) No fueling facilities will be provided. 6) No launching facllltiea will be provided Of 9/25/85: , j 1) The south side of the doca. be fenced. 2) No dockage of boats be permitted on the south side of the facility (2 other stipulations removed M no longer apply.) an as -built survey is required. I L.M.C.D. •H I I m3-/r> p • i f• • * ScbaiCt Marina dock li \se stIpul&tl&nst subject to* of 10~26*83» and that 1. 2. 3. No expansion of the dockage will be allowed as a No additional dock is allowed on the south or on the The slips are for rental use only by the general public, and not brokerage or eelee. 4. No canopies are peraitted 5. No fueling facilities will be provided. 6. No launching facilities will be provided. The 9-25-65 amendment is approved with the following stipulac ionst A. the existing posts cither be removed, or moved to within 3 to 4 feet }• of the dock, to prevent additional tie-oiiS{ Be the fence on the south side of the dock b< extended to the end of the dock I C. no dockage of bocts be permitted on the south side of the facility) and D. the transfer of posts and the fence-exten-ion to be inspected after their completion and prior to extension of slips on the north side. 10-30-aS m ^3 • 9 N nj j.t T ▼T~. -'I ••••'*. V-. ^ECEiVbU ftY 2 G 1988 L.M.C.D. • • ••nr.*.c -jr ,•* . /• * • 9A^- S'' JU-oslM ■/ ?S^ - - /^J> LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO STORAGE OF WATERCRAFT ON LAKE MINNETONKA AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES; AMENDING LMCD CODE SECTION I 02, SUBDIVISION 41; ADDING SUBDIVISIONS 10 AND 11 TO SECTION 2.05; AMENDING SECTION 2.045. SUBDIVISION 2 a); AND AMENDING SECTION 2.03, SUBDIVISION 8 b) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT (LMCD) ORDAINS that the LMCD Code of Ordinances, be amended as follows: Section 1. LMCD Code Section 1.02, Subd. 41 is amended as follows: Subd. 41. "Restricted Watercraft" means any boat or .cssel for use on or stored on the public waters of the Lake except for boats or ve ssels which are 16 feet or less tn length, and which are unmotoriged of which use motors of 10 horsepower of less.’ unrestricted watercraft as defined in this section. Section 2. LMCD Code Section 1.02 is amended by adding new Subdivision 55 a) as follows: Subd 55a. "Unrestricted Watercraft" means anv boat or vessel for use on or stored-On the public waters of the Lake which is: a) 16 feet or less in length and unmotorized: or b) 16 feet or less in length and which uses a motor of 10 horsepower or less; Qt c) 20 feet or less in length and unmotorized. and which is propelkd SqIcIy bv humaa power. Section 3. LMCD Code Section 2.05 is amended by adding new subdivisions 10 and 11 as follows: Subd. 10. Special Rule for Unrestricted Watercraft at Non-Commercial PQCks. Unrestricted watercraft, as defined in Section 1.02. shall not be counted fQL purposes of determining compliance with density limitations ot this section a( noiT* commercial docks. Subd. II. Special Rule for Unrestricted Watercraft at Commercial Docka^ Unrestricted watercraft, as defined in Section 1.02, shall not be counted fpr pufPQSSS of determining compliance with density limitations of this section at qomiriCrgial docKs provided: 1) the watercraft are not stored in the water of the Lake or on a mechanical lift, and 2) the watercraft are found bv the Board to be used for public rental and there is no more than one such uncounted watercraft for each 25 feet of shoreline at <he site unless a ^ireater number is required by the Board as a public amenity, o r 3> the watercraft are found bv the Board to be used for educational purposes, and there is no more than one such uncounted watercraft for each 15 feet of shoreline at the site. 4) and watercraft for rental or educational purposes are under the exclusive control of the rental or educational organization. Section 4. LMCD Code Section 2.045, Subd. 3 a) is amended as follows: a) "OfT-Lake Storage Facilities shall mean any dock, mooring area or launching ramp used by any club, business or association in conjunction with the storage of betHi ©r restricted watercraft off the water of Lake Minnetonka. Section 5. LMCD Code Section 2.03, Subd. 8 b) is amended as follows: b) Storage Rule. No watercraft may be kept, stored, lied or moored except at the location of a Boat Storage Unit designated as such on a current license issued pursuant to this section, and no facilities requiring a license under this section may be used to keep, store, tie or moor a greater number of watercraft than the total number of designated boat storage Units for that facility, except as provided for under Section 2.05. Subd. 10 and 11. This enactment is in effect from and after its passage and publication in accordance with the enabling act of the District. It is enacted by a majority vote of all the members of the Board and has the effect of an ordinance. Adopted by the LMCD Board of Directors this__day of 1994. William Johnstone, Chair ATTEST: Douglas E. Babcock, Secretary wpwiiiNmiffmLofd r Excerpfof Resolution settln(| application lees tor licenses, etc Resolution No Paqe 2 d. watercraft Storage Unit (WSU) refers to the or facility available for Booring, docking or storing a boat or watercraft, including a mooring, boat or watercraft slip, space within a boat or _ slip, or any other space provided for storage of boats or watercraft to be used on the lake. Watercraft storage units at multiple docks and co««ercial docks, for unrestricted watercraft St<?raqe..^^prQViaed^ Lr under section 27o5. Subdrio ^pd.LU shall be }determine iracco?dancewi^ the^Ilowing schedul for each slip: up to and including 20* long and/or up to and including 10' wide =* 1 WSU over 20* up to and including 24* long and/or up to and including 11' wide - 1.5 WSU over 24* up to and including 32* long and/or up to and including 12' wide - 2 WSU over 32' up to and including 40* long and/or up to and including 14* wide -2.5 WSU over 40* up to and including 48* long and/or up to and including 16' wide * 3 WSU over 48 long and/or over 16' wide » 4 WSU Measurements for WSU shall be determined as follows* 1) three sided slips-measure storage area inside of arsuf length-if the two parallel sides are not equal, the longer side shall be . tLre is a canopy using the shorter dimension, then the shorter dimension shall be used 2) two sided slips-measure the two sides inside of the dock structure .,.w 3) tie on slips-(straight docks with side a) single boat storage unit (BSU) per side-the maximum length where a watercraft stored shall be used for the slip g ' the slip width based on the maximum for that b. iuJtioirBirpL side-the slip length shall be determined by dividing the radii2?®end°thr2idtrshell®brthri.aximum for that slides-Silfb^based on 1 WSU per BSU ?acKs-«ni be based on 1 WSU per asu5) «) propose change / LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ENVELOPE CONCEPT - STAFF FEASIBILITY REVIEW - 12/23/93 Currant Code reaairenents for multiple dock licensees.! 1) Board approved dock plan with Boat Storage Units (BSU) designated by nueber (Sect. 2.03, Subd.8). 2) No watercraft nay be kept, stored, tied or moored except at the location of a BSU (Sect. 2.03, Subd.8). 3) New license is required for any change in ownership, slip size, length, width, height or location of a slip or the multiple dock structure. Under certain conditions, the Board may grant a new license without a public hearing or additional fees (Sect. 2.03, Subd. 7). 4) No changes may be made to dock structures with non­ conforming boat density (less than 1:50*) that result in an increase in slip size or the number of BSU, without first securing a Special Density License (Sect. 2.05, Subd. 9). 5) Multiple dock licensees with grandfathered docks extending beyond 100' may not alter or expand the portion of the docks that is more than 100' from the shoreline, (without first obtaining a variance) Proposed Definition of "dock for multiple dockSL The dock use area (DUA) in which the multiple dock structure is maintained within the setbacks and length limitations, with variances, if any. Proposed Conditions for Licensing within a Dpck Epvelgpgl 1) Licensees would be limited to the current number of licensed BSUs if boat storage density is non-conforroing (less than 1:50'). Increases in the number of BSUs would require a new license and be allowed only if in conformance with 1:50' density, or 1:10' with Special Density License. Special density licenses, which provide for a maximum density of 1:10', are available to -j-.i commercial marinas, clubs serving the public and municipal docks, in exchange for public amenities. 2) Boats may be stored anywhere on the docks within the envelope, except in the setbacks or beyond the length limit for that site. BSU locations and slip sizes would not have to be designated on a dock plan. However, the licensee would be required to certified survey of the dock plan available for LMCD review. 3) Non-conforming structures beyond 100* could be oHo reconfigured, but no additional slips or increases in slip sizes allowed except where allowed by a variance. Envelope Concept-Staff Feasibility Review, Page 2 4} Fees could be charged by square footage of space occupied by the dock structure to include maneuvering space between dock sections, space between dock and shore and the area beyond docks opening lakeward 1.5 times slip length. Results of implementing the Dock Envelope proposal; 1) It would allow multiple dock licensees to make changes to their dock configuration and BSU sizes and locations without LMCD approval. 2) Licensees with grandfathered densities could change slip sizes, and enlarge or add walkways within the envelope, but not increase BSUs. 3) Inspections would be simplified, invoxving mainly boat counts and conformance with setbacks, eliminating slip measurements and checking BSU locations. 4) It would reduce multiple dock regulations and restrictions. 5) LMCD would have to require as-built certified surveys of all multiple docks, seasonal and permanent, which maximize their envelope use to the setback and length limits, to verify that the dock structures are within the DUA setback and length limits. 6) A new as—built certified survey would be required each time changes affecting the perimeter of dock envelope were made to verify that the structure still meets setback and length requirements. 7) This proposal would allow licensees to increase slip sizes to the extend space is available within the envelope. This could result in an increase in larger boats stored, reducing the number of slips available for smaller boats. Larger boats are known to contribute to the existing wake problem. 8) Municipal licensees have substantial potential dock envelopes into which they could expand. Mound Commons docks could be assessed on a BSU basis rather than envelope due to the unusual circumstances of their extensive commons shoreline. 9) The fee structure would need to be changed. Resulting fees would likely be reduced due to reduced staff time. This would free staff to concentrate on other existing priorities. Once the multiple dock income is reduced, it may require additional sources of income or increase the municipal obligations to fund these existing priorities. Off—lake storage could be assessed on a per boat stored basis as is presently done. LAKER _ 12/13/93 LMCD reminds lake users of *shorezone* restrictions The Lake Minnetonka freeze- ■ over began Thanksgiving weekend. This marks the beginning of • numerous winter activities on the lake, cross-cotuitry skiing, skating, ice fishing, ice boating ami snowmubiling. to name a few. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District has estab­ lished the “shoreronc” on Lake .Minnetonka, to prevent conflicts anumg these various acuvitics. The sliorczonc is that area of tlic lake ice within 150 feet of the shoreline. The shorezone is • reserved for mxi-motorized activi­ ties including, but not limited to, walking, skating, showshixing, cross ciHintry skiing and fishing. Motorized vchielcs must stay clear of the shoreline except to uavcfsc the shorezone by the , shortest direct route to and from shore to the 150-ft. line, or approximately parallel to shore in narrow areas of the lake -- i e., channels -- when necessary at a speed no greater than 15 mph. Outside the shorezone. speed limit-S for motorized vehicles arc 40 iiipli during daytime hours and 30 mph for nighttime hours. If a snowmobile is more than 1.000 feet from shore, the daytime speed limit is 50 mph. However, any motorized vehicles within 150 feel of people fisliing, fishhouscs. pedestrians, skiers, skaters, .skating rinks, or gatherings of people or property must limit their speed to 15 mph. Caution should always be taken when traveling on the ice by fool or vehicle, particularly in unfam­ iliar aicas or where there has been no previous tralfic, an LMCD . "news release wiuns. Ckcasionally. take residents will leave dtv ks or dock posts in the lake over the winter. While these structures arc within the stiorc/oiic. tlicy arc a potential ha/ruil. Ihc LMCD recommends that rcsidciiLs wiUi suuctiircs left in Uic lake put rclicctorizcd material aroumi posts, and rclicciors on docks. It is also a gootl idea to put snow Iciicing around structures tliat may he a *'azard. This simple preventive lucasurc could help yon avoid an injury. For additional information about winter regulations or for a AVinter Rules” brochure, call the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District office at 473-7033. “W'intcr Rules" brochures arc also available in boxes at the public accesses and at city halls. I Sp. Park LMCD rep asks for city ’s # support; suggests conflict of interest 1 I Itj* Lorric Ham I , I The Spring Park Cily Council ‘ has gone on ^ord supporting the , dissolution of the Lake ,! Minnetonka Conservation I Disir*ct (LMCD). But at Monday night's ^ council meeting, the city's j LMCD rcprcscntaiive. Doug Babcock, asked the council lo support the LMCD and retain ilic city's local voice in I >c Minnetonka managemem iso on hand for the iiicciing were • LMCD Executive Director Gene Slrommcn. I'onka Bay LMCD rep Tom Penn and Shorewcod rep ^ Bob Rascop. Babcock cited conflict of interest on the parts of Mayor Jerry Rockvam ami Council- member Mark Brcnciiiaii in the support of a cily resolution calling for the dissolution of the LMCD. According Pj , • icmcnl read by Babcock, instructed /net lo discu*' or vole on any '‘LMCD issiH .s involving the Way7a(a Yacht'Club l»* causo*a.’t- a member of the club there was ' the possibility of a conflict of • inu.rcst that could potentially "embarrass ” the city. But ' Babcock claimed that the same "high standards of behavior regarding conflict of interest' were not being Iollowed at the council level. According to Babcock. Mavc>f Rockvain. owner am! ofxrrator of Rockvam Boatyards. and Councilmcmbrr BrencfTtau. general manager of Norlfi Sltore Drive .Manna, hoih sijnd lo rcalirc a direct financial benefit bv the dissnhition of the LMCD. Babcock claimed that rieMiicr of llu: businesses v^ould have to pay mry LMCD fees il he group wa^ (JfSbnnilcd. Mayor Rockvam disagreed. 'That isn’i true.” he said. "All tlic rcsr)hiiton says is that as a city we feel that there is a duplication of taspayers' dolbrs • that some services arc being duplicated by agencies other tliaii the LMCD Sr. PARK • •. CunL un P. f Sp.' Park . . . I rt»in Page I » * * *.. . *> i . ‘ >. • ^ « M "The resolution is a result of a request by Mound Mayor Skip Johnson at a LMCD mayors' meeting a few weeks ago." RcKkvam commued. During that discussion. Orono Mayor Ed Callahan called for the disbanding of the LMCD. In response, Mavor Jofinson asked that each mayor biing ihc matter up with his city’s rouncil. T!ic resolution up for discussion in Spring Park calling lor the dissolution of the LMCD is the result of that request. "This resolution has no bearing on the LMCD fees that we pay." said Mayor Rockvam. ( "All Ill's resolution does is to express the cilv's opinion on llic LMCD." Babcock stated that/‘‘even V ihaugh Joiner rtictiif)brs*^f^ift5' council may view die i-MCD.as.-.*. providing duplicate services of other govermncni agencies, there arc significant services lliat the LMCD provides lhal no other local agency can provide." Babcock added that in (he worst ease, the council would liavc to deal with multiple county, state and pcrh.ips federal agencies if the LMCD was dissolved. Ihc council did not lormally vote on the rcsoluiinn, which has been discussed at other mccliugs f ccnily, because one council- member was not present. The council will likely vote on it at the Dee. 20 meeting In the mcamiine, the council directed llie city attorney lo review Babcock*.s charges of conflict of interest prior to the coencil's vote. Ill aiioilier LMCD mailer, the council voted lo rescind its "voluntary contribution" to ll»c LMCD milfoil fund datfitg back to 1990. I he city had been making its annual payment lo Ihc LMCD since that ^ime not reali/ine ihat a I'ortioii of the pavmcnt re|)rcscnicd a "\oIuiiUiry comributioir to the LMCD ntiifoil liind. The council rs'loo£liig7()i a crcdll flohrtlic^ LMCD for die past lour years and • . (Ic(*i(fed not to make that connibution in 1991. !• O Y; 5" ^/ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 EAST WAYZATA 8OULEVAR0, SUITE 160 • WAYZATA. Mim«^SOTA 55391 • TELEPHONE 612/4^^033 CUCEN6 «. STWOMMEM. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR board memrers David H Cocfvan. Chaif GrMfiMOd Tom Poon. Vico Choir Tonka Bay Oougtas E Balx^ock. Socrotary Spr* Scott Carton. Traasurar Mmnatfista Mika Bloom Minnatof^ Baach Aibad (Bart) Foalaf OaapHavan James N Grathiaot Excctsiof JoEtlan L Hurr Orono William A Johnstone Minnetonka CXiane Markus Wayzata George C Owen Victoria Robed Rascop Shorewood Tom Reese Mound Robed E. Skxum Woodland TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: DECEMBER 6. 1993 FROM: TOM REESE. LMCD REPRESENTATIVE SUBJECn': NOVEMBER REPORT - LMCD 1.0 Kiiraslon WatermilfQil T»$KI 1 With the fading of the enthusiasm for weed pulling, the indeterminate results of the Sonar enclosure tests, the slow progtrss of ^ research on the biological solmion. it ^PP<;f “ ' measures at all are the choices lor the next few years. The DNK is proceeding with plans for a tr>chiopyr test on Lake ^ ’ This is the successor to 2-ID. In addition next year they will ^ wSclakeS of Sonar in Parkers Lake and Lake Zumbro. Even . the» wiSle bt'n le«s are successiul , 1 doubt if Sonar ,s an answer for a lake as large with plans for a harvesling program for 1994.'in an effort to reduce fragmentation, we may convert one harvester to paddle wheels. 2!? who gel lots of press, want the I MCD to scale back ils plans to implement the 4-akc Management Pl^. mv v^w inhfs were to be successful, it could have a senously negal.ve Sfe« o“’the lulure manner in which the lake would managed. For ipa«s”lhc DNR?n “lhS ule'fmT ro^mplemern te c"oSred:'ar^“srarwT4?«^^^^^^^^^^ to *he cities. 3't Electrical Engineer who is willing to donate Ton Reese Mound Representative - LMCD cc. Gene Strommen t • i -A i si?- I-^ w- s'-. I S II 2 ? S <Mgs 5 r a S ll 1 fl ^ =■ c I? Si ^If 5 a g $ ^ ^ rs 3 « 2 Q.1-5 -iy £ o 2 ^ s s ^i 5 5^ I 2 ^ ^ §5-5 « 3^ O 5> Ml 3 |il 'I 3 ^— r. w : 3 § ^ ^ k» ^§2. : . s 5- r?i t S; <JO X n§F2 ® 3-a - § ■*• _ 3 3- 3 5 t ^ 3 ^ r ^ ^ ^01 ^ Sf ^ 3 C r- C. iT ^ ^ ^ - 2 3I = 3 a 5 cl i Hll 0 5 *• 3C O. 5 £ 3*.• 3L, '*• 1^ 2 2 3^5^ H ► n ^ isai y n. 0-^55 c 3 c. » 2? D ^ X 2|IH|t I 3^1?I 53 $ T» ^ I- i t t oo 3 wi - I :|!55l|l^ l?3f|a III !i||I ?l ?' ° s ^llslliss ^ 2 < ft* 3 ^ 0, ^ a ft# §: f 3 <3 ^ c O O J Q.£'<5 g s 5 ® 3 »Sl S S’ ^ r» -■ 3 2 Mm ft* ft* 'o ^ S, «I s- ^ 3 ^ s Si ^ ^ < A 3 -o ■2 i I I S3 M S 3F 2 ao sf t;^ o 2 5 5 I =IliJ/ft 3 y i “S 5- D y' 32 ui ^ Ai ’ll ^-‘Cl 3 2 • 0"i-Ja Isf • 2 — 3 ^5 o ; 2 < S p c =r O a0 3 5 a X3 3 3= s: -e. ^ft O MS^ X o? 5 . T ^ f. ft* • ^f =9- 5 ^ ^Oft a ^ O N) ^15{L:32f* vc 3TS 5 ^ £.3 < S 9 3-ri15 ’ 3 n t 3 o f !r 0 5! C" *“ (JO (IrM 4, -r^')3 O i 3c 1^ ^ ■v > ^ S3 5 g SIS 3 i S' i 5 ft ft» '< <1> 3 00 • 2Cl. a ^ 5 ft. 3 L* Q- k ?■ ; .- ■ VI 3 . 00 § S O -«s m*ft ;;; 5 0 o-^ ^ cS £T ^ ^ 2 S ^ 5, § >« r3' I ^ I ST 3 S 2<S i JI 5 OQ §2BIsi? ^1 <S“ I'l. ^ I 5 sa C <» »<1 ^ ftl ^ tn Sr K J? Q- 3 ’ Q> 1182 8.5 3§ ■ PiJl'5 la i'sfm C O <ft a e< S j >"'llsiS- ||§.|i ’ § 48 ^ I 3 O Q. C S 5 •no;?. G. o o 5 255;^ 3 2 3ftl (8 ?. IB o H MANDATES Tht Ltagut opposes any adduional unfundad state mandates and urges ail branches of the federal and sUae governments to adopt a policy which promotes accountability at all levels of government by directly linking the funding responsibility for programs with the level of government creating the program. If this principle of accountability can not be adhered to, the state and federal governments should provide stable revenue sources to compensate for the costs of mandates and help reduce local compliance costs by giving cities greater flexibility in meeting new and existing mandates. In cases where the state and federal government do not provide necessary funding, the League supports legislation which would allow local governments to not comply with mandates that are not funded. The Leujpie also urges the Legislature and Congresss to review, repeal, or revise current mandates. The Legislature and Governor should also e tcourage the newly-created Bocud of Government Innovation and Cooperation to fulfill its responsibility to review mandates for elimination by the Legislature. One of the most serious problems facing cities is the growth in the r*'Tnbcr and cost of federal and state-mandated programs which substitute the judgments of Congress and the Legislature for local budget priorities. These mandates interfere with local decisions regarding city services and force cities to reduce funding for other basic services or to raise taxes. Federal and state policy makers must resist imposing mandates that direct cities to allocate scarce resources without regard for local needs and piorities. The League, therefore, supports legislation which allows noncompliance with new unfunded mandates. The League recommends that only under specific conditions should this noncompliance option not be available. The League also believes that a statement of compelling statewide interest and need for a new mandate should be required both for new laws and for state agency rules. Examples of costly mandates include: comparable worth, binding arbitration, prevailing wage, veteran’s prefer; ice, election requirements, payment of state sales tax, and federal regulations on wastewater treatment, drinking water, and stormwater management. League of Minnesota Cities i resources to the i^ency to cootinoc and expand the com munity assistance profrun • Financial assistance programs should not ficnafize connmiiiiiics (hal iiavc adjusted Ihcir local utility rate system or reserve funds to meet facility financing needs. • The Laguc supports rearicting cKgibility for on-site system financing to areas which are not mdily able to connect to existing or programmed city sewage facilities. The League opposes direct or indirect resthaions on construction of new city facilities if itesc restrictions arc inconsistent with other slate or regiorul development controls. LUEET-11. Water C PtcKnratkm (B) ;rvai The League supports stale water conservation and presetvation programs that maintain a significant role for cities and provide adequate financial assistance and flexibility. In order to safeguard the public health and the environment it is necessary to conserve and preserve our water resources. Many watershed districts, counties, cities, and towns have done a good job of dealing with surface and groundwater management issues and have the authority and ability to continue to do so in a cost-effective manner. These existing mechanisms should continue to be used to the greatest extent possible to address surface and groundwater management problems, instead of establishing a new system or creating new v-rganizations. The League supports, as a basic principle, that no one has the right to pollute either ground or surface water resources. A reasonable relationship of economic and social costs and benefits should be a precondition toward achieving a goal of non-degradation of tratment resulting in clean water. The ability of cities to meet goals must te recognized as ccNUingeni upon the availability of adequate funding, inclu<1ing stale assistance. Thae (mncipics should apply to IhmIi iIic protoction of our drinking water supplies and the operation of municipal services The Lague suppens the following groundwater and sirface water prelection uututivea. • Continuation of the state's safe drinking water act compliance program which uTKfenakes fxlerally mandated tests on behalf of cities. However, re-examination of the water connection fee imposed by the Department of Health on connections to public water supplies should be undertaken The fee should be modified to elimiiute the inequity in the current $5.21 per year fee being collected from community supplies but not from non-community systems. Additionallv, measures to ensure that testing is accomplished in a cost-effective manner should be adopted, including the use of private sector laboratories. Local units of government should retain the basic responsibility for surface water management, because they are closest to the problem. Efforts to minimize duplication in regulatory programs should be continued. The state ’s new wetland conservation program should continue to be evaluated and amendments to improve the act should be required to be introduced in the 1995 legislative session, especially amendments to provisions of the wetland rules that conflict with existing state storm water management and water quality programs. The League supports efforts to control erosion and sediment runoff not only from urban sources but from non- urban sources. • The League supports a full legislative review of all water-related permit fees and 1994 City Policies and Priorities the ifliposition of these fees oo kx^ uoits of govenuncnt to the extent thit the ic&ul costs to tlx state cannot be specificaily justified and only serve as an alternative wwam for the state to raise revenue. If fees are determined to be properly imposed oo joveminental units, the fees should be based solely on the cost of actually providing govemnicntal service to the political subdivision, and private sector alternatives should be made available to ensure minimal costs to local taxpayers. LUEET-12. WetLmdsC' (B) ;rvai • f Tht League, along with many other governmental associations, supperred passage of the 1991 wetlands conservation act. Experience gained by administration of the interim program and participation in the rule-writing for'the permanent program indicates a need for additional legislative action. Specifically, the League supports the following legislative initiatives. Remove the $75 limitation on replacement plan reviews. Since all proposals to alter, drain, or fill a wetland involve a substantial expenditure of local staff time, including, but not limited to. professional engineers or hydrologists, any limitation on cost recovery less than actual expenses means that the general taxpayer is subsidiaing the proponent of an activity which, by definition is potentially adverse to the environment. Initiate detailed review of costs.'benefits of expanding the scope of protected wetlands to include Types 1, 2, and 6 and evaluate alternative mitigation methods to compensate for any direct loss from impacts to Type 1, 2, and 6 wetlands. Amend the governmental oversight process so landowners can clearly understand which fovenuneiit unit needs to review a proposal, and reftne the system to ensure expedited reviews of proposals consistent with the environmental goals of the program. Piovkk for state defense and indemnirication of local governments administering state laws for any “taking" claims which property owners might allege. Make wetland replacement requirements equal between urban and non-urban land at a 1:1 ratio. LUEET-13. Zoning, SubdiTision, and Planning Statists (B) The League supports the recodification of the existing planning enabling statutes but opposes changes that would restrict cities ’ current substantive and procedural flexibility to address unique circumstances. Minnesota’s zoning, planning, and subdivision statutes and regulations are essential to promoting economic development, preserving environmental resources, and ensuring the efficient delivery of public services. The governor ’s advisory council on state-local relations conducted a thorough review of the state’s planning and zoning laws. The League participated in this study. A subcommittee of hKal elected officials was formed to review the recommendations developed by a technical committee composed of planning officials from townships, cities, counties, regional development commissions, and the state. Those recommendations have been collected in a report on land use legislation, and draft legislation has been prepared, reviewed, and modified by cities throughout Minnesota. The League supports passage of the legislation as currently proposed. The 1993 Legislature preempted local authority to adopt setback requirements for manufactured homes in a manufactured home League of Minnesota Cities REVENUE SOURCES RS I. State Aid to Oties (A) Stale aid and property tax relief programs for cities wens originally established in exjunction with the introduction oi the state sales tax to reduce the reliance x the property tax. These programs have allowed cities to provide an adequate level of services to Minnesotans, regardless of local property wealth or service overburden factors. Certainty and stability in the state aid system remain a major goal for city officials. However, in three of the past fxr years, state aid originally certified to cities during their budget process has been retroactively cut. When this occurs, city officials have few optixs but to reduce essential city services and delay necessary maintenance programs. To ensure certainty and stability, the League recommends the following policy guidelines if changes are made to the state aid system: A. Local government aid (LGA) should remain an essential component of the property tax system. The program should annually grow along with the growth in local government trust fund (IXITF) revenues. LGA is an important source of non-property tax revenue for cities. Annual growth in the appropriation for LGA is necessary to prevent increased or excessive city reliance on the property lax. The League continues to support its 1993 LGA formula proposal and, guided by the principles of that formula, will support formula changes that will improve the stability or the integrity of the program. B. The League opposes the conversion of city homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA) or LGA to school aid. Converting city HACA or LGA to schxl aid cxid force cities to dramatically increase their property taxes in order to maintain suffictcni operating revenues. In addition, due to exstant pressure to increase the resxrces available for schxls, there is no assurance tlttt exversix of city HACA or LGA to school aid wxld result in permanent redttctixs in school levies or 1 avc a neutral impact X the taxes paid by Io<.'al taxpayers. C. The League supports restoring the HACA growth factor for cities. The 1993 Legislature repealed this provision for cities, schools, townships, and special taxing authorities. However, counties continue to receive additional HACA under this provision. The HACA growth factor assures mat the property tax relief provided by the state through the classification system is paid by the state and not provided by shifting tax burdens to other types of property. RS-2. Local Government Trust Fund (A) The 1991 Legislature established the local government trust fund (LG I F) to create a dedicated and stable source of revenue for necessary state properly tax relief programs. However, since its inception, LGTF revenues have lyen the target of budget balancing efforts of both the Governor and the Legislature. With uncertainty surrounding the 1994-95 biennium budget, the LGTF is begirming to .isemble the unstable and undesirable system it was designed to replace. The League recommends the following policy guidelines if changes are made to the local government trust fund: A. The League continues to support the local government trust fund (LGTF). However, this support is contingent on the 1994 City Policies and Priorities n stability atul integrity of the fund. Cities continue to support the concept of the LGTF which inclutlcs in irrcvocaUe dedication cf a portion of the sales tax and motor vehicle excise tax to a defined and stable set of profKrty tax relief programs. If dedication cannot be assured under the current system, the League will pursue modifica».ons to tlw structure and composition of the fui.J or a constitutional dedication of the trust fund revenues to property tax relief programs, or both. B. To prevent rapid increases in local property taxes, city aid from the local government trust fund (LGTF) should adjust annually at the same rate as sales tax and motor vehicle excise tax (Af\'ET) revenues. The LGTF was established to provide a secure source of funding state aid and property tax relief programs. These programs are an important revenue source for most cities. Without growth in these programs, property taxes would be us^ to fund all necessary buagetary increases. C. The League supports modification to the local government trust fund (LGTF) provisions governing surpluses and shortfalls in the fund; all programs funded by the trust fund should be adjusted in a direct proportion to the surplus or shortfall. Currently, surpluses are distributed to local government aid (LGA), the county community social services act (CSSA), and county criminal justice aid. Shortfalls in the LGTF are balanced by reducing nearly all programs funded by the LGTF, including homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA). The integrity of the LGTF would be enhanced, and the volatility of any particular program would be reduced if all programs were adjusted in a similar manner. D. The League opposes changes to the property tax elass(fication/HACA system that would cause significant shifting of property tax burdens from one class to others. A portion of the property tax relief provkJed to farms by the 1993 Legislature was accomplished by shifting county and schcx)i taxes to city taxpayers. This shifting causes local property tax burdens for certain properties to increase due to the actions of the Legislature. However, local government officials are held responsible by their taxpayers. RS*3. Service DupIkatiQO Taxation Exclusion (A) The League encourages the Legislature to adopt League supported legislation which would enable city property taxpayers to become exempt fivm county levies for services which are either not provided to city residents or which duplicate services provided by the city. In many cities, residents are paying the costs of county provided services such as police protection, which primarily benefit county residents outside the city. In other cases, city residents may receive benefits from the county spending, but the services duplicate services which city governments are already providing. In order to more fairly allocate the cost of services and to eliminate duplication, city taxpayers and city governments should be given authority to petitioii to be exempt from county taxes or fees for services that duplicate city service or for services that are not provided by the county within the city limits. Currently, the city taxpayers in some cities are not required to contribute to the costs of a county library system if they are already paying for a city library system. Legislation should be passed to allow this arrangement to be extended to other services. During the 1994 session, the Legislature should study this proposal and hold hearings to allow testimony League of Minnesota Cities In 1993, counties are alk>wcd to hold payments made on or before May 1 5th until July 6. Although cities may petition to receive up to 70 percent of these lax rev'cnucs by June 31, this still allows counties to accnie interest on city tax receipts for over a month. With the October 15 payment, the counties can hold the funds until November 30 , there is no opportunity for earlier paymerrt to cities. These delays benefit the counties and result in lost cash flow benefit for cities. C. The Legiilalurt should rtpeal authority for counties to assess a separnte charge to administer special assessments. The 1993 Legislature has given new authority to counties to impose unlimited charges to administer special assessments. This new fee brings into question what county functions are paid for by a county’s gcr»ral fund levy, including the general administration of all such taxes and fees. This new fee results in higher taxes for city residents, who are also county residents and pay county taxes. This authority allows counties to impose unregulated and unnecessary fees for duties which should be included in the overall costs of county government. This new authority is also contrary to the current efforts of cities to become more cost efficient. There is no opportunity for cities to chose to ao.ninister special assessments in the most competitively economical manner (eg. duties performed by the city, a private contract, etc.). RS>7. Citr Fund Balai (B) The Legislature should not attempt to control or restrict city fund balances. These funds are necessary to maintain the fiscal stability of city governments, provide adequate cash flow, allow purchases of capital goods and infrastructure, and to maintain favorable bond ratings. There are many financially sound reasons for cities to have adequate cash balances, including the following. • The funds that a city has on January 1 must finance their expenditures for the first six months of the year. A city’s primary sources of revenue, property taxes and state-shared revenues, are not received until June and July - six to seven months into the city fiscal year. Just as the state has asserted its need to maintain an adequate cash reserve account, a city must have a fund balance for its operating expenditures to avoid interfiind or commercial borrowing. However, unlike the state government, cities do not receive monthly revenues from numerous sources (such as sales taxes, personal and corporate income taxes, and various fees and charges to other governments). The alternative is costly borrowing, which is not in the interest of local taxpayers or the state. • Some cities also use their fund balance tor major capital purchases or infrastructure. By gradually accumulating revenue over a period of years, a city can save its taxpayers the expense of issuing debt and incurring a large expense in one year. Cities explain this process of “saving" for major purchases, such as fire equipment, to their taxpayen and the state when cities “designate" their fund balance for such a purpose. • Cities need to maintain some fund balance to meet emergency or unanticipated expenditures created by situations such as natural disasters, lawsuits, and premature breakdown of vital equipment. Cities are not allowed other revenue raising authority to address these issues during their budget year. • Bond rating firms require proof of financial liquidity and a demonstrated ^ ability to service debt in order to receive a Lcuguc of Minncsotn Cities favorable bond rating- Adequate oty ftiai haiawr^c arc rcquircd for prelercntial bond ratings. Additional interest co^, and higher taxpayer burdens, result when cities without adequate fund balances receive poor bond ratings. The better the bond rating of a city, the lower the interest co^ of borrowing are to the taxpayer. RS-8. Ctty Financial Repon Reouirements (B) The League supports modernization and an increased level of comparability of financial Antn that cities report to state agencies. The League will continue to work with the financial reporting and accounting Oudy (FISREP), the Intergovernmental Information Systems Advisory Council (IISAC), and the Legislative Commission on Planning and Fiscal Policy to accomplish these efforts. The Ugislature should, however, fund the study and implementation of changes through the general fund, rather than the Local Government Trust Fund which is to be tUdicated to property tax relief. Local accounting practices and preferences should not be required to change as a result of the study, nor should local costs increase. Finally, requirements for reporting additional irtformation should be carefully weighed to determine the validity of the state *s need for local government data. Minnesota has one of the most modern and rigorous systems of municipal fmance oversight in the nation. The Office of the State Auditor currently receives and reviews annual financial reports from all cities. Cities over 2.500 are required to have annual audits and the Auditor has authority to audit any city. Cities also report financial data to the Department of Revenue, Pollution Control Agency (PCA), Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED), and other state agencies. The private accounting field has proven to be fully competeiit to conduct city audits, and are likely to be more economkal than contracting with a public agency. Therefore, the League is opposed to giving the Office of the State Auditor the authority to audit cities or their instrumentalities. For all audits, local governments should be allowed to take proposals and use a private auditor rather than the State Auditor, if the government chooses. In addition, cities with populations under 2,5(X) should continue to be exempt fiom the expense of an annual audit. RS-9. Coopera and CoosoUda A •I, CoUah (B) A • The League supports the extensive efforts which have been made by cities across the state to provide services through cooperative agreements, collaboration and, in some asses, consolidated programs or governments. We support the creation of the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation, and the opportunities it provides to help stimulate cooperative efforts and to eliminate mandates. Additional funding for grant programs, however, should not be funded through the local government trust fund and should not be at the expense of funding for current programs. The state needs to acknowledge that even with state encouragement, local officials are the most qualified to determine where shared or consolidated n^ices are most appropriate and will be most effective. Many studies and surveys of cities in Minnesota have shown that cooperative agreements and shared services are very common. Cities across the state continue to make efforts to increase the number and extent of programs provided, and/or to reduce the costs of public services. Because city officials are most qualified to assess local needs, the Legislature should not mandate cooperative agreements or consolidation requirements for any city services or the form of city government. 1994 City Policies and Priorities WEST HENNEPIN RECYCUNG COMMISSION GreenfieW-lndependenc*-Long Lake-Lo»»fto-Map<e Piain-Medma-Oono 65 Stubbs Bay Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 476^12 3 1994 28 Decsreoer 1993 To;Mayor and City Council City of Orono Re;Status of 1994 Municipal Recycling Entitlenent Grants/ Projected 1994 Yearend Condition, and 1995 Funding V • I f ^ ■» L—I I Status of Recycling Grants It's official. The County Board approved the 1994 municipal recycling entitlement grants program on Tuesday, December 21, 1993. Relative to this good news, curbt^de recycling of; Yearend Condition you can anticipate a 1994 year condition for Curbside Contract WHRC Contribution $ 63,180 2>13.i Total Costs Amount Covered by Grant Asiount Not Covered by Grant $ 65,314 $ 45,414 $(19,900) Any questions can be directed to me at 476-0012. 1995 Funding Beginning in 1995, funding for curbside recycling programs will decrease significantly. Although the funding scheme has not entirely been worked out, I am advised that funding will probably be one-third of the current amount. As soon as I learn Cue new formula and amounts, you will be advised. Fulviai by WHRC with 80% funding by Hennepin County Printed on Recycled fb^r r PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT Hennepin County Government Center Northeast Mreet Level 300 S. Sixth St. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0011 (612) 348-3848 FAX (612) 348-9857 HENNEPIN FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: The Hennepin County Board has reduced fees for garbage disposal in the county, effective Jan. 1. 1994. The County Board voted Nov. 30 to reduce the current tipi.'^:ng fee -- the cost of cf'^posal for garbage — from $95 to 160 per ton for all waste facilities in the county system and to establish a . solid waste management fee that will be applied as a percent of a resident's or business's garbage bill. The fee was set at 9 percent for residents and 14.3 percent for businesses. Both the $60 tipping fee and the solid waste management fee will take effect Jan. 1. With this new funding structure. Hennepin County expects that most garbage bills will decrease after jan. 1 because the disposal cost plus the solid waste management fee will be significantly less than the current disposal cost. The purpose of the solid waste management fee is to fund environmental programs which protect the health and welfare of county citizens. This fee will pay for recycling services, household hazardous waste management, tree waste management and other solid waste management programs. -more- garbage di$posal/2 ‘A primary goal is to have a ancing system that will allow the county to continue to work with cities to help fund their very successful recycling programs.** said County Commissioner Emily Anne Staples. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT rnkmm^mssmi^ 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345-1597 Offla: (#12) 93»-8320 f«*: (612) MS4244 WSTIBCT AOIIMSTRATOT: Elte" 8 Sones BOARD or MAlUUiERS: Ttwmas Mapt*. Jr- Pres. • C Wooorow Low • John E. Thomte CtoMonU«>ley»TTKimasW Laflooniy • Martfa S. HartW • PenwA G. BSxl January 3. 1994 % / )TA BWtW Mr. Rondd Moorse City Acknkiistrator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Mr. Moorse: JAN 5 1994 I vftXJkj like to introduce you to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District We manage water resources over a 181 square mie area in Hennepin and Carver Counties in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Some cf Minnesota’s most highly valued water resources lie within our borders. Urban development and ongoing rural activities have deseed the quality of our lakes. We \rant to preserve these resources for future generations. Our recently approved Water Resources Management Ptan provides us with some tools for managing our water resources and new opportunMes for working with (kher agencies to pursue mutual goals. New state arxJ federal programs provide other opportunities and challenges. The enclosed fact sheet discuss^ our lake management activities. I feel it gives a pretty good overview of what the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District does. It might assist your membership in understarvllng our watershed district. If you agree, please distribute the feet sheet. We are encouraging ideas and participation from state agencies, the District ’s communities aixi other groups interested in restoring and protecting our water resources. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District managers believe that cooperative partnerships can best avoid duplication of government programs and most efficiently achieve common goals. Thank you for your support. If you have any questions or comments, please call our District Administrator, Ellen Sones, at (612) 939-8320. Sincerely, Tlfomas Maple, Ur. President Enclosure MCWD LAKE MANAGEMENT ACriVITIES The 181 square mile Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) originates west of St. Bonifadus. It ends 29 miles later when Minnehaha Creek joins the Mississippi River. Most of the MCWD lies in Hennepin County, although about 30 square miles are in Carver County. The District includes all or part of 27 cities and three townships. The MCWD’s 22 prindpal lakes include some of Minnesota’s most important water resources. Some of the District’s eight regional parks enjoy greater use than many state parks. Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota’s fifteenth largest lake, is the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area’s premier general recreation lake. The Minneapolis Chain of Lakes receives more visitors per year than all of the metropolitan area state parks combined and nearly as many as Yellow Stone hational Park. With these important resources to manage and protect, the MCWD takes its lake management responsibilities seriously. To better protect and manage these resources the MCWD encourages communities, government agencies, and private citizens in the watershed to help. The MCWD does four things to manage water resources in the watershed: 1) regulates new development, 2) prepares a water resources management plan, 3) funds a capital improvements program to implement the management plan, and 4) collects watershed hydrologic data. Each of these four activities applies to all water resources in the watershed. They form the basis for the MCWD’s approach to lake management. This information sheet discusses what the MCWD is currently undertaking in these areas and addresses the District’s future plans. It also talks about some significant changes occurring in the watershed over the next few years. We encourage public participation and cooperative efforts with communities and government agencies. We believe opportunities for cooperation exist in the areas of regulation, planning, capital improvement projects, and data collection. MCWD Rules The MCWD’s rules apply to new work within the watershed that may impact the quality or quantity of water. MCWD permits help ensure that developers and property owners follow MCWD rules. In an average year, the MCWD issues about 200 permits for activities such as stormwater management, floodplain alteration, wetland alteration, dredging, shoreline improvements, and stream and lake crossing. awareness The dredging and shoreline rules adopted by the MCWD protect homeowners ^d the environment To ensme that work follows MCWD rules, the MCWD requires licensesfor shoreline and dredging contractors.The MCWD’s rules grew out of the water management and planning needs of the early 1980 ’s. These have changed over the past decade. The state and federal government have added new programs and new planning requirements. To meet the needs of the future, the MCWD will evaluate its rules during 1994. Lakes and wetlands comprise almost a quarter of the watershed. These include 108 protected waters and 237 protected wetlands. The MCWD focuses much of its regulatonr attention on areas adjacent or tributary to these protected waters ano wAlands. Some additional promotion of these rules might increase public awar> and involvement. It also might help uncover violations. Feedback on existing rules and suggestions on how they might better Project the watershed ’s resources will help the MCWD assess its rules. The WcUand C^nseivation Act wiU require changes in MCWD rules. Ranges in the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act may also require changes in the MCWD’s rules. Cooperative efforts between communities and agencies can make rules more effective. The District’s dredging rules resulted from a cooperative effort between the Minneso a Department of Natural Resources, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation Distnct, and the MCWD. The MCWD will discuss these important changes at several important public nieetmgs over the next two years. Anyone interested in participating should contact the MCWD office and request to be placed on the mailing list. MCWD Planning Requirements State statute mandates that the MCWD prepare a Water Resources Management Plan This plan manages water quality and quantity throughout the 18Jwatershed. The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) approved the MCWD s plan in May, 1993. The MCWD’s Water Resources Management Plan does several things. First, it provides an overview of development in the District. This provides placers with^ mportant baseline. It also collects and compiles data needed for managing the MCWD s water resources. This information assisted the MCWD’s Managers in identifymg objectives for the District’s water resources and develop a management strategy for attammg these objectives. The MCWD’s policies and rules implement the management strategy. An important part of the management strategy includes a capital improvement program that implements the plan. f water management planning is another important part of the MCWD s Wtifer Resources Management Flan. The MCWD’s approved plan was produced from State requirements during the 198(ys. Since that time, the state has passed more stringent local planning requirements. Local water management plans can play a major role in protecting water resources. The 27 communities in the watershed will need to prepare lo^ water management plans by May of 1995. Capital Improvements Program The MCWD’s Water Resources Management Flan identifies priority water resources. The plan’s management strategies look at ways to manage these priority resources. Projects in the MCWD’s Capital Improvements Program implement these management strategies. The MCWD has completed two major capital improvement projects since its creation in 1967 and several smaller projects. In the winter of 1979*1980 the MCWD built the Headwaters Control Structure and Channel Improv^ements Project. The Headwaters Control Structure on Gray’s Bay provides greater control over Lake Minnetonka Water levels. The Channel Improvements improved the flow of water in Minnehaha Creek. The Upper Watershed Improvement Project built four detention structures, two sedimentation basins, and one fish barrier in the Painter Creek subwatershed during the winter of 1984-1985. This project reduced nonpoint source pollution within the Painter Creek subwatershed to Lake Minnetonka and dso provided an additional 900 acre-feet of storage above Lake Minnetonka under 100-ycar storms. Since 1967 the MCWD has completed several smaller scale projects in cooperation with communities in the watershed. These include channel dredging and repairs to Minnehaha Creek, building canoe landings and several small scale maintenance projects. Gleason Creek In 1993, the MCWD and the City of Wayzata began a joint water quality and flood control project for Gleason Creek. This project reduces flooding along Gleason Creek by adding 140 acre feet of flood storage. Two stormwater treatment ponds constructed along Gleason Creek will improve the quality of water entering Lake Minnetonka. Long Lake This past year the MCWD completed Diagnostic and Feasibility Studies for Long Lake and has completed a draft implementation plan. The MCWD is \i-orking with the cities of Long Lake, Orono, and Medina, local homeowners, and the Hennepin Conservation District (HCD), the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the Minnesota PoUuticn Control Agency (MPCA) to develop a cooperative plan for improving Long Lake. The cooperating Cities and Agencies will identify water quality goals for Long Lake. This project proposes two stormwater sedimentation basins and two aerators. The MCWD and the cooperating cities and agencies will look at public education programs, fisheries management, citizen ’s lake monitoring, best management practices and other measures to reduce nonpoint source pollution. This project will also look at ways the MCWD’s Water Resources Management Plan and the cities’ Local Water Managemeru Plans can better improve and protect Long Lake ’s water quality. Minneapolis Chain of Lakes The Minneapolis Chain of Lakes suffer degraded water quality. The water quality of Cedar and Lake Calhoun falls below levels considered desirable for swimramg during certain times of the summer. Although Lake Harriet’s water quality remains good. It needs help to remain that way. The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, the Cities of Minneapolis, St. Louis Park and Edina, several state agencies and the MCWD have joined together on a Clean Water Partnership project for the Mirmeapolis Chain of Lakes. This S6.5 million project wiil span several years and will involve a variety of in-lake and watershed measures and practices. The cooperating agencies include every agency that can help. The proposed measures range from small, volunteer efforts to large capital improvement projects. These measures include improved street sweeping, better parking lot maintenance, better lawn and garden management, better ordinances, and changes in use patterns. Large scale projects include construction of grit chambers and detention basins to treat storm water, repairing shoreline erosion problems, and treating the lakes with alum to improve their clarity. Public education will also play a major role. The MCWD will build several wetland treatment sy-stems over the next six years to treat stormwater runoff to Lake Calhoun and Cedar. These wetland treatment systems will significantly reduce the phosphorus loading to these lakes. This will improve both swimming and fishing. They may also address potential flooding problems. Wetland treatment systems also provide wildlife habitat. Lake Minnetonka Lake Minnetonka is a priority resource for the MCWD. The following chart lists the phosphorous loadings to Lake Minnetonka from its tributaries. The MCWD’s two largest capital improvements projects, the Painter Creek and the Gleason Lake Creek projects, address two of the largest sources of phosphorus. The Long Lake project will focus on another large phosphorus source. Two future proposed capital improvement projects will look at Langdon Lake and Six Mile Creek. 1 Lake Miimetoiilui Total Phosphorus Loadings 1 Tributary Average Annual Loading (tons/yr) Gleason Lake Creek 1.06 Long Lake Creek 0.35 1 Painter Creek 3.78 1 Six Mile Creek 0.72 1 Minnewashta Creek 0.06 1 Langdon Lake Outlet 1.10 Christmas Lake Creek 0.02 1 The District’s Gleason Creek, Painter Creek and the Headwaters Control Structure capital improvements projects cut flooding around Lake Minnetonka. By allowing better water management, the Headwaters Control Structure also cuts flooding on Minnehaha Creek. The Gleason Creek and Painter Creek projects hold stormwater in ponds. Some of the sediment in the stormwater settles out in the MCWD’s ponds instead of the Lake. The MCWD regulates new development in these tributary subwatersheds, and the completed and proposed capital improvement projects focus on structural solutions to Lake Mirmetonka ’s water quality and quantity problems. In the 1995 revisions to the MCWD’s Water Resources Managemeru Plan, the MCWD will look at ways to improve its rules and plan to better address the needs of all water resources in the MCWD. To succeed, lake management and other best management practices need to supplement these activities. The Board of Soil and Water Resources Metropolitan Area Local Water Management Rules require cities to prepare local water management plans. These plans must be consistent with the MCWD’s Water Resources Management Plan. These plans can play a key role in the protection and management of Lake Minnetonka. To help implement these local water management plans, the MCWD wll work with three small communities on Lake Minnetonka. These local plans will include best management practices like those considered for Long Lake and developed for the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes. The MCWD will also look at modifying its Capital Improvements Program to help implement these plans. We are also looking for other funding sources. To guide the future management of the water quality and quantity of Lake Minnetonka, the MCWD is forming a technical advisory committee (TAC). The TAC will advise the MCWD on revisions to its Water Resources Management Plan, rules, and capital improvements plan. The TAC >vill also provide guidance on the local water nianagcmcnt plans. This group can also help focus the different lake management activities and programs that can benefit Lake Minnetonka. We have invited the Hennepin Conservation District, the Department of Natural Resources, the Board of Water and Soil Resources, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District to join. We will also invite the lake communities and other interested parties to participate. Other Projects The MCWD’s Capital Improvement Program includes several other proposed projects. Some deal with mapping and data collection needs to improve flood control within the watershed. Others look at improvements to control flooding and improve water quality. This winter the MCWD will start a cooperative project with the Twin Ciues Tree Trust, Hennepin County, and the communities along Minnehaha Creek to repair damage caused by this past summer’s high water and flooding. Hydrologic Monitoring Program Since the hydrologic monitoring program began in 1969, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has built the best long-term water quality and quantity data base in the metropolitan area. This program annually collects data on precipitation, lake levels, stream flows, lake and stream water quality, and groundwater levels and quality. These data support the MCWE « water management planning and provide a foundation for the Board of Managers ’ decisions. Valuable trend data helps the MCWD identify problems, set objectives, and rank future projects. They also show how well completed flood control arid water quality projects can function. Precipitation Monitoring Most water entering the District comes from precipitation. The National Weather Service records precipitation at two sites within the watershed. The MCWD supplements this with precipitation daU from nine sites. These additional sites help show the variability of precipitation across the watershed. The northeast comer of the watershed averages four inches more precipiution per year than the southwest comer. Total precipitation volumes help calculate water budgets for the District. These data help size stermwater detention and conveyance structures. Ground Water Monitoring In 1972. the MCWD began collecting water quality and quantity data from nine municipal and private wells in or near the watershed. Although two of the wells ^e no longer in service, the MCWD now has over 20 years of data from the remaining 7 wells. Water level data from a long period of time shows a variety of water table trends. For example, it can show if the water table is naturally replenishing itself or if wells are depleting the water table faster than the natural recharge rate. Combined with precipitation data, well records can help quantify recharge, runoff and seepage rates. Lake Monitoring The MCWD collects water quality data necessary to show a lake’s relative water quality. This way, we can compare the lake to other lakes and also evaluate its condition time. Lake water quantity data helps predict inflows, runoff levels, and subi^crshed water budgets. It also helps establish ordinary high water levels for lakes. This sampling program in particular looks for signs of damage to lakes from urbanization, waste water effluent, and polluted runoff. Since 1976, the MCWD has collected water quality samples from six stations in Lake Minnetonka. These are sampled three times a year. Once a year the MC^ samples 15 lakes upstream from Lake Minnetonka. Three times a year the MCWD coUects samples from eight lakes in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes, ^boratory analj^is looks at these samples for 15 parameters including nutrients and various chemicals that show degraded water quality. Stream Sampling Streams are important recreational areas and provide important habitat for fish and wildlife. They also deliver polluted runoff to lakes. Stream water quality and quantity data help identify potential flooding problems and gauge degradation to water resources. The MCWD samples ten stream sites twice a year (mid-May and Mid-October). Cooperative Efforts The MCWD has cooperated with other agencies on several data gathering efforts. Oyer the 25 year history of the District’s hydrologic monitoring program, many other agencies have supported the District’s efforts. These include the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, the Suburban Hennepin Parks, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Recently the MCWD supported the Suburban Hennepin Parks program to monitor runoff from golf courses. The District is also working with the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board and several state agencies to investigate the high levels of mercury found in fish in certain city lakes. Let’s Work Together New state and federal programs, increasing development, and a growing concern for our water resources will bring many important changes in water management in the near future. These changes effert the MCWD’s rules, planning, data collecting and capital improvements. These changes will give government agencies, local communities, watershed districts, an d private organizations many opportunities to work together. i V 8