The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-20-1988 Planning Packet127S PUmiHC OOMMISSIOH X, jun 20r IMt ■QAD soun -7i00 P.N. ^ • I M I . ' ' ^ • I CIL IBPRISnTATIVI - Ed Callahan ATTBHNiaCBAcnon ims 1. #1207 Gane & Catharine Scanlonr 2815 Caaco Point Road - Conditional Usa Pamit & Variance - Second Raview 2. #1278 Ron TiaM, 4496 North Shore Drive - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 3. #1280 Nendy L. Ifeihe, 1376 Baldur Park Road - Variance - Second Review 4. #1290 James A Lorence* 4460 North Shore Drive - Variance 6 Conditional Dse Permit - Public Hearing 5. #1291 Alfred Zversonr 2835 Casco Point Road - Variance - Public Rearing 6. #1293 Grace Baptist Churchy 2880 Shadywood Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Rearing 7. #1295 John McDowell» 165 Turnham Road - Variance - Public Rearing 8. #1296 Merritt J. Peterson 6 Rick Stodola, 1895 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Rearing 9. #1297 Washington Scientific Inc.* 2605 West Waysata Boulevard - ComsMrcial Site Plan Review - Public Hearing 10. #1298 Richard Johnson^ Vacation of Portions of Forest Boulevard# Saga Rill Revised - Public Hearing 11. #1299 Nancy Riggins# 3017 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit •> Public Rearing ADDITIOMAL ITEMS 12. Planning Conmisslon approval of June 6# 1988 Minutes. 13. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the July 11# 1988 Council Meeting. ADJOUR ■’c ■ A» i ' I-*' ^ Si^n irt avAi'labte. -Maii /. rot i. I 1 FHONt Dims Planning Coanitsion Chaicaan Kella]^ Orono Planning Cotmisaion Neabera City Ada^niatrator Bernhardaon Jaanna A. Nabuath, zoning Adainiatrator Juna IS, 19S8 r4 STOJBCTs #1297 Gana and Catharina Scanlon, 2815 Caaco Point Road - Variancaa - Sacond Raview Dist of Ishibita Exhibit A - Raviaad Survay Exhibit B - SKatch of Raviaad Plan/Elavation Exhibit C - Hardcovar Raaoval Shaat Portiaant Ordinaaeas Saction 10.03 Subdiviaion 15(F) aida yard aatback for accaaaory atrucutraa raquirad ■ 10 faat Fropoaad atructura « 10 faat Applicant will not raquira a aida yard aatback varianoa. Saction 19.22 Subdi.iaion 1(B) raquirad ■ 75 faat 9 Original dack aatback « 15 faat (€0 ft or 80% varianca) original ahad aatback ■ 0 faat (75 ft or 190% varianca) Propoaad dack ■ 20 faat (55 ft or 73% varianca) Propoaad ahad « •«> 20 faat (55 ft or 73% varianca) t ■ »i . ; * : t saction 10.22 Subdiviaion 2 0-75* aatback araa ■ 4,200 aq ft Allowad * 0 aq ft Original hardcovar (axcluding rataining walla and atapa ft or 6% (210 aq ft deck, 49 aq ft ahad) 259 aq Propoaad hardcover 212.8 aq ft or 5% (228 aq ft minua 16 aq ft for landing area of staira atructura) New hardcover approved in 1978 « 165 aq ft or 3.9% (15x11 ft deck). Total approved hardcovar in 1978 « 214 aq ft or 5% (165 aq ft, 49 aq ft ahed) 75-250 foot aetback area ■ 9,600 aq ft Allowed « 2,400 or 25% Exiating » 4,200 or 43.7% Applicant proposes renoval of hardcover totaling ■ 128.9 sq ft or 1.34%.* Review Exhibit A. * Applicant will provide a complete survey of hardcover to be removed in addition to a date for completion of that removal. Review of Revised Plan The applicant has submitted an amended survey designating a 15 X 11 foot deck this was the sixe approved in the original 1978 review. In reviewing the sketch of the revised elevation/plan with the applicant it was noted that the plan still shows a 15 x 14 foot deck. Applicant advised that because of the location of the shed underneath the deck and the width of the retaining wall to the rear side of the deck» or to the land side of the deck, that the 14 foot depth is required. Based on an earlier drawing in the first packet that was sent out on this application, this tier of decking appears to be apporximately 18 feet in depth and that if a wider width was required for some reason that applicant could redesign the deck to accommodate the shed but that it would be difficult for the City to approve any deck in excess of the 165 sq ft that was originally approved in 1978. In reviewing Exhibit B the sketch of the revised plan the stair structure has been reduced considerably modifying the impact and the intensity of the lakeshore structure. There is now a single access stair down the lakeshore bank, running parallel to the cedar deck. A safety stop and stepping pad area provide the necessary landing for the steep descent. Applicant will present their position as to why they require the deck at 14* x 15* dimension, in addition, applicant will provide a more detailed plan of the hardcover to be removed within the 74-250 foot setback area sometime within the spring of next year. Staff also advised the applicant, who was willing to have the surveyor make another amendment of a survey that would show the 15 x 14 foot deck, that this was not necessary. It should also be noted that the applicant seeks, at a minimum, the replacement of the same sized deck that was approved in 1978, which would be at 15 x 11 feet. The original request of 14 x 10 feet was in error. Please review the staff memo dated June 1, 1988 that was drafted for your June 6th meeting. Please review the section on the options available to Planning Commission to assist in the drafting of your recommendation. If Planning Commission members seek additional information please advise staff prior to the meeting so that we can formally act on the Scanlon application at our June *:0th meeting. As staff would like to present this application before the Council at their June 27, 1988 meeting. ■I 4. i 4- V .. J 3 [f©I10^i JUN I 71988 VI Jun« 16, l!9M To:Orone Planning Coaniaaion Froa:Gana & Cathy Scanlon 2619-Caaeo Point Road «■ Ra:Variance Raquaat Whan aa bagan tha procaaa of getting approval for the variance» our aaaaingly aiapla and juat intent vaa to raplaea what waa loot to ua in tha July atom. Wa are truly grateful that tha planning coaniaaion haa allowed that tha aain intent of that raquaat ia a raaaonablt one. During tha procaaa of acquiring tha variance* %»a have cone to raalisa that tha raaponaibility for aaintaining tha intent of tha city ordinancaa ia one taken vary aarioualy by thia coaaiaaion. Tharafora* that fact haa required ua to aodify our axpaetationa and ralaaaa our pravioualy held poaition of total raplacaaant. Wa hava net avar wantad to violate tha atatutaa and/or ordinancaa of tha City of Orone. Wa propoaa aeaa trada>offa and coaproaiaa to anawar naada and addraaa tha concarna of tha coaniaaion. Wa bD9!t that what wa would libt ia approval of tha deck* atoraga and atap plan wa praaantad at tha June 6* naating of tha planning coaniaaion. 1> 2> 3) A 15'xl4' deck - aa aho%m A aacura locked atoraga area under tha deck A aafaty landing to tha aide which %pould allow ace to tha atoraga area and a break froa tha ataap incline of tha atapa. Tha pravioua variance granted allowed a 19'xll' deck. Wa could change tha plan to reflect that grant and t#ould accept that. Tha aurvay ahaat ahowa a 15'alldeck.- 1 night add that tha additional three ft. would not add any aora hardcover bacauaa it would ba eonatructad over axiating hardcover. /■ » drono Planning Coanlaaion P4gn 2 As tha plan axiats* wa would naad tha araa showing stopping pads as sceass to tha storsga shad undar tha dock. Tha stairs# which continua on* and tha safety landing %#ould lasva tha araa in front of tha opaning to tha ahad! claar and prowida accaoa to tha dock abova. Tha ataira would not add nora hardeovar bacauaa it t#ould raat on hardeovar that is alraady thara. Thorofora* tha propoaad dock (lS'xl4*) with an undar^dack atoraga araa and a continuanca of tha atapa to a landing and anothar aat of atapa to tha dock* would not involra any nora hardeovar than alraady axiata. Tha goal of tha plan is to aaka tha lakafront* functionally and aaathatieally* as graat an aaaat as wa can. Wa faal that tha rataining walla and tha tarraeing which has baan conatructad* hava provad our willingnaaa to financially do tha bast «#a can. Tha dock is an axtanaion of that willingnaaa. Tha dock would ba at laaat 10' froa tha adsacant proparty lina and 20' or 23' fron tha ahoralina dapanding on tha aixa of tha dack. At tha top of tha bank* whara tha ataira will and* is a 19'x9.5' laval which is eovarad with atona Chardeovar* if you will). Soaa of that araa was waahad away. Whan tha tarraeing was conplatad* that araa was fillad in and eovarad just an it had baan bafora tha atom oeeurrad. Tha contractor/landaeapar mnt as far aa ha could until a dataraination about tha dack* storage and stairway had baan nada. Whan tha othar construction is eonplata* ha will return to finish hia part of tha job. Wa would aliainata tha rock* gatw* fence and shrubbery now existing. A gate at tha top of tha ataira and an appropriate fanes would dalinaata tha top of tha bank. Wa would naad thaaa daaarcationa for safety raaaona. Wa will than aod right up to tha fanca at tha top of tha bank. This change would shrink tha hardcover 180.5 aq. ft. in tha O'>75' setback araa. Additionally* in tha 75' to 250' araa «fa would* during month of July or by tha and of August* shrink tha amount of hardeovar in two placaa. To tha right and to tha laft of our antry-way atapa ara two araaa wa could put back to a natural atata. Ona araa 9'x 3' (27 aq. ft.) and tha othar approximataly 8.5'x 3' (25.5 aq. ft.) i • ^ 8 mmmmm ♦I- •f\ •» i %■ k < •J HA . k Orono Planhifig CofiaiMloii P«9« 3 Th«r« is « concrsts covsr which prssussbly csppsd • W« wsrs unswsrs that ths srsa undsr that eenerata cap hadn't baan fillad in, until, in tha atom, tha lowar laval, ineludinv tha furnaca roon, atora9a araa, wood working rooa, laundry roon and fanily roon had floodad. Tha “wall** waa eovarad with wallboard and it was not apparant that no blocks or fill aniatad bahind it* by lata spring a, and cartainly by aarly aunnar, wa will rapair tha aniating walla and ranova tha cap to raatora it to a non-hartfeovar araa. It naaauraa approainataly 11'* 7.5' <104.5 aq. ft.). Thoaa ehangas would shrink tha hardcovar araa approxinataly 159.5 aq. ft. <#a would ba happy to hava thoaa araaa inapaetad and tha eoaaisaion aaaurad that mrk on thoaa proniaaa had baan eonplatad. Wa cannot do tha work on tha lowar laval now bacauaa, quita frankly, wa will hava run our financial string out conplating tha work on tha front of our pr^arty. I’ Wa hopa that tha quaationa raiaad at tha Juna (!onniaaion naating hava baan aatiafiad. Wa hava baan grataful for tha tina, conaidaration and patianca givan to tha solution to our problan. Wa hopa that as you raviaw our ip0v^nnd proposal and tha raduction in hardcovar lavala, that %#a ara coning naarar to cloaura on this projact* Sircaraly (^thy and Gana Scanlon CS/gb r iPos Its I Planning Comlssion Chalnun Kallay Orono Planning CoMwisnion Menbers City Adninistrator Barnhardaon Miehaal P. Gaffron, Aast Planning a Zoning Admniatrator June 1, 198S -/fPMcWT^ /JoT SttbjMts ^#1278 Ronald Tiae, 4496 North Shore Drive - Variance - Public Hearing ^Blioatlra - Request for average lakeshore aetback variance to conatruct Staff notea that a aignifleant hardcover variance ia alao neceaaary* Dletrlct - LR-lB. l-acre aewered List of Bililbite Exhibit A - Bxhiblt B “ Exhibit C - Exhibit 0 - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - :Exhibit K - Application Plat Nap Property Oimera Liat Lettera fron Neighboring Property Owiiera Applicant*a Letter of Request Applicant's Subaiitted Survey Proposed Deck Plan View Staff Seale Drawing of Deck and Sightline Concerns Staff Hardcover Review Letter to Applicant's Contractor 3/25/88 Docueentation froai Vailance Approval of Garage in 1977 Portiaont Faets i*. •«A*ting house already encroaches into the defined average j ***2®^* ••tback. The proposed deck on the lake side of the hone will include a railing, and the platforn will range fron near grade level to approxinately 7* above grade at the west side. The views enjoyed by Nr. would be slightly encroached on as shown setback vai^^nc^* ^*^**^**** subnltted a letter in support of the average Although applicant's letter indicates he is not aware of a hardcover problem on the property, staffs review of hardcover indicates that while hardcover in the 0-75* sone is merely a fraction of a percent, in the 75- 250 zone hardcover is excessive as indicated belowi 0-75* 75-25r* Existing 18 s.f. (0.2%) 5,654 s.f. (43.9%) Proposed No change 5,918 s.f. (46.0%) After Removals as Recommended by Staff (Exh. H-2) No change 4,915 s.f. (38.2%) Note that the proposed deck is partially over existing hardcover, with a net hardcover increase due to the deck being 264 s.f. Staff feels there specific hardcover items that can be removed, shown in EXIIxDXw n**2« 'T'MW’ V- o 'TO 2-0 t • f > ; Zoning File #1278 Page 2 of 2 Dlscnseioii In 1977, a forner owner of this property applied for and received a variance to construct an attached garage, which was cosgtleted, and received approval to construct a 12* by 12* free-standing deck, which was never constructed. When those variances were granted, the City was not reviewing hardcover In nearly ns much detail as is done today. There Is no Indication that any speeiflo percentage of hardcover was ever approved. The current proposed construction Is all sore than 75* froe the lake. There Is no significant hardcover In the 0-75* tone. The hardcover In the 75-250* sone Includes an excessively large driveway area that Is entirely gravel, only a portion of which appears to be driven on often enough to ellnlnate all vegetative growth. There are also substantial areas of decorative rock beds underlaid by plastic. Hardcover on the property also Includes a 16* by 24* concrete patio at the lower walkout level. Staff feels that In order to approve the hardcover created by the deck. It would be appropriate for Planning Cosmlsslon to recosunend that specific portions of the driveway gravel and a large percentage of the plastic areas be Hade non-hardcover, as Indicated In Exhibit H-2. This will decrease the final 75-250* hardcover to just over 36% rather than the 46% that would be nalntalned under appllcant*s proposal. Regarding the average lakeshore setback encroachsmnt and diminished views, the neighboring residence to the east Is sonewhat higher In elevation, hence a deck with 36 ” railing will have only a minor effect on those views. However, any future enclosure of this deck to make It a covered porch, would have a significant effect on those views. Staff leoesMndatiea Staff recmwends approval of the hardcover variance and average lakeshore setback encroachment, finding that the effect of the additional hardcover created by the deck can be reduced by eliminating various other hardcover on the property, and finding that based on topography In the neighborhood, the proposed deck and standard 36” railing will have no significant effect on views enjoyed by the neighboring property owner at 4480 North Shore Drive. Staff would recommend the following conditions on that recommendation for approval: 1. Removal of existing hardcover In the amount of 1,003 s.f., leaving a final approved hardcover In the 75-250* sone of 4,915 s.f. or 36.2%. 2. Applicant is advised that enclosure of any portion of this approved deck that will encroach past the existing sight line from the property at 4480 North Shore Drive, as defined by the existing corner of the applicant's house, will require a formal variance application. cm OF OiOHO - VARIASCB APPLICATIOM Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional vari Renewal Variance Pee $75.00 (no change fron original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) OmC) f i FBOFtMT LOCAnoa Site Address ^ ^ ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ~ V - Z. Please check one - Property ^ abstract torrens? required *surv^***^^^^^*** application if not included on APPLICANT Name ^ vO \\(A ^ Phone (home) H 1 2- *) ^ Phone (work) ^ ^ ^ Addresst (/ ^ Citv» Zipt ONNBR (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) a • » • a Addresst Cityt Zips Date Pr^erty Acquired (month/year) ^ot) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRB8BHT 08B OP PNOPBITT Present Zoning District Present Use of Property y\ g>^<s STG1A6 i cm OF (mo nrn9i$mmiVFici _ other (specify)1JS0200000 I mi OBSCRIPTZOil OP SNQOBST Estimated Construction Describe request in detailsc,(^ 707:21 -~L_ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-(Sv/E.AAt^e. ^HT^ACJT '- --—- - - - - - - - --- - -~-"rL.-Ji::::^-flLcr5/^pariahcbs rbqdirbd Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Other ^0£ft.A»e>£ S(aY(^Ac^ _ Hardcover Side _Rear) HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting frcsn strict enforcement of zoning regulations; i=a,L.s£ qm ^ ^^>> -;-r> ^£^K _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DB8CR1PTI0H OP ORDSOAL PROPBRn COHDXTIOHS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements I*=>*** • s.( v/Be.\ c.L. >S£ HI 1. 2. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. IXRD SmMZTTakLS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A~€03 (3ovt Center 348-3271). Stamped* legal sised envelopes (#10) pre-addresSed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application* please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not t>een included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICAHT'8 81 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator* agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. J^plicant's Signature ' ' Date ///1 4 . “LO-^^ 0IIH8R8 8161 The owner hereby aclcowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff* consultants* agents* Commission members* and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this .request.,/ Owner's Signature t Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building h Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. scale IC«I i * B ,•.>/ »I"C’ ;a /fsr f •: I f y •Li r. f# ■< rwor MC^M J‘ i 0 J5*/«. <2)M r y*t « \ -O/'V ttOO! > '»S "‘JC'/^' A ■?5 t » itfii*5s »t' / 7 \L' »\'fXfc (/'T; / / .s /► In ./:• •'i > • i* t#*^-£mi ‘N *• vvV** 'i. \ -V.&. 1/ \ ? «’iv> ^ -"^ ■V *r tj y\ I \ , J'<-M; - ,»u »-t ’'^V. ^ ;- / /•'(})? / I POINT o :.•«. ^ 1 ^ •1 ,} r*. . *■< ■ ■ MO 5 3 . O _ TJ m m ni > aa \ -< ni a - ^ w f- o —ii^i •: s §|s n Hi fn o ut t Ml -i*S III Hsi ^ •?s* uIPS M W M I 3 illSS’ > rn z ^i's* I C.C.OM > ni m ^ $ ^ *n -VI $ •»• -fi ^ PI m o oO 3Qill sse e 8? SSfip 8 S w?!S! r *^*"87* mSSS^ *ii|s ssM M s;^«8 ifisLl 2i!2i8 8 m rn §s ^ sps |5 « Ml 2 ^ ^si'-ss ii -< O Ml O M ^ U 81 • fit O s ., .. SSl3|s 3 "S| liil« *1 * H-< es*^ Siliis o o 2 wiio m 8* 30c. M's- *m o 8 51 s i»lo A 5PI *1 |L Ml IMMi 8 »i:U O PI O *ia5 i5 “8 2! Ml PI Mls» fM Mir. I ii:!« M'lss*”sSr ii§i!:^ PI 8 I S« IIfll* I if .3 *1 W ?-' T Sfjrt IL I i ijrf --- t V .IS 1 (we) Adjeoen4 Profw^y Oimrs* A^cnowledgeaeiit Font ''J, 6itrMf'^(' of ^ [print nane(s)j have reviewed the plans property located at Application Ho. _ _ \m for the proposed improvement [print address] or proposed use of the referred to as Land Use X (we) understand that in executing this ac)cnowled9ement» I (we) an (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confim for the City Council that Z (we) an (are) aware of the inprovenent plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. m \b [S’? bate Date If you have any infomation that nay assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application# please submit your comments to the Building § Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. April 15. 1988 City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 To Whom It May Concern: After reviewing Ron Timm's deck plans for his house at 4496 North Shore Drive I find that I have no objections to his building the planned deck addition on his house. “V- ■. V -f; ' • . . April 15. 1988 #1^C%/f ii City of Orono P.O.Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 To WboTQ It Ms^ Concern: After my conversation with Ronald M. Timm regarding his plans to build a deck on his house at 4496 North Shore Drive, Orono, and upon reviewing the plans thereof, I would like to state that I have no objections whatsoever in him building the deck described in the plans and do not feel that his building that deck will interfere in any way with my view or enjoyment of the lake or interfere with the enjoyment of or the value oi 4480 North Shore Drive. the value of my property at Sincerely. John J. Cretans 4' -4^- ■ ■ • %■ April 22,1988 #1 0 . •> " / ^ rev City of Orono P.O.BOX66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Planning Commission/City Council: This letter is to state my request for a variance to build a deck onto my h Forest Lake. le on My situation is unique in that the house to the East of me is set back quite dose to the road and if I build the deck that I have planned, the Planning Administrator for the aty of Orono feels that it will interfere with John Grotan's view of a small portion of the lake. His overall view of the lake will be unobstructed except for a small portion of water on the Southwest comer of the lake. I have review^ my deck plans wiUi Mr. Grotan and he feds that it vrill not interfere in any way with his view of the lake or his enjoyment of it and will not negativdy affect Uie value of his property (see attached letter). My adjacent neighbor to the West of me wiU virtuaUy be unable to see the deck from his property because of the relationship of my house to his and the trees that separate our prop^ties (see attached letter). Additionally, I have a hardship in that it is not feasible or legal to build a dedc anywhere else on the property. Other then the Average Lakeshore Setback provision of the building code, the deck meets all requirements for lot size, hardcover provisions, and all other setback requirements. Thank you for ^our consideration in this mirtter. Sincerely, ^ Ronald M. Tiimn / Plat of Surroj for Allan C» Grannaa of l^to 1 ami 2, Oarequiat»a Socond AddiUon to Saiga mu llennupln County, Mlnneaota Cdrtifioato of Survo/i «nta, i“ ««<»<*- ScaleI Odta : 1" = 40* 2-28-77 Iron nurkor cao- TTii,itS' ■ iSSfeofuu Uuid Sunroyor and Planner long Lake, Kinnaeote #1rj vy r ■ \ ______.-Ji-^'--—-•! \ ’^* ^’.. •• I*. •’ r- /••'' ■ # .••.’ N fi*- pjtoPosefc* 4MO ^l^tiTUNe X »» ^r/ino I SltQMF^lC. feXM. H P-'7c' 4)2tA ^ t)2zy'7zr- • Aa»« Tf I fi V ex'-^^<^-- .ff-^(../0,£; \ fOO 7r-2-r^ ' k«Jt(-- 12.,072. s.(. >»«.se seJ>3<..l * /fi»87 (?) j.v^xiv' iT76» (g).; .1^ iJife .^-N. r 1/ ro''f / 2.*'7-*'"*• 2 r^y Firnc) Juri.^ ^yp-A'TrtC 6- >' 2 V / X 12- ^ 2- XW/ft/ iifJo yx/2- V& ' ^ 8V (^ *- </fc CD r 58^ CD ; t 12.0 C©/ r wo (tt).*- r 12. CD e 112 C£) « /c. O - /4,0 UcC> r c£> ^ (2)) ^,0X2® '- - ^ar\ t Q //6 X22 880 e^ST 5U5±ji: r /V •/rr/.^.y -H7-072^--W3>^^ feofr5i€ t--5- .- QtM . I ““'7D..J-. g.x/snx't I/O c£ IS rcffo li */(..o % p^Cf'OStti >• • 4• • i #• •s r V’ ?/. / vV':r- • I ^V' 1% «• V __________------------------------------------------------ t L ry f h ' S / «/ \ 1 »V s 1^1?: \ \ ,.. ^ to ^X/sr/A* ^ 4 / K ♦» I j* ¥ (T) 6.'>“^S'’ r ^70 S,<*. (^ i/£l^'- £.4 - I/O • ^ 2^/5" sf. - -« *.fcOOO V ^ M. " \ \ TOT Art- P.-cfOicSi — / C> 02. ^G>^-c\yA t r /©oS s'f- cji. Ti2.,e-7t -2a.2-% |^»v«6V4<.S f-1 CITY OF ORO^ GlTYoTORONO Port Ollk* Bo» CS*Ciyrtal Bay, Mina—>a 56323*Mmkipal OfBea* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Match 25, 1988 lO —. - . T Anetican Remodeling, Inc* Attnx Terry Farrell 1935 West County Road B-2, Suite B-36 Roseville, MN 55113 ^ Re: 4496 North Shore Drive, Orono Dear Mr, Farrell: The Building & Zoning Department is in receipt of your application for a building permit, which office on March 25, 1988. A review of the the following information needed for review is missing. Site Improvement Plan (drveways, landscaping sidewalks, decks, etc.) ^) Hardcover Calculations (form attached) Provide size, spacing and type of materials for structural members. Review of your application will not continue until the noted items are received. Failure to submit required items immediately ma* result in delays in issuance of permits. He have also returned your check for $25.B* to you as »e do not require a fee to be paid until you cone to pick up the pernlt after all required reviews have been completed. Please contact the Building 6 Zoning Department at 473-7357 if you have any questions / Sincerely,Sincerely, // Thomas J. /Jacobs, Senior Building Inspector Michael P. Gaffroh, Asst Planning S Zoning Administrator Enclosure - Hardcover Calculation Form - Check #1284 BUILDING a ZONING - 473-73S7 assessing ADMINISIRATION a FINANCE - 473-7358 P’JBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 ^ t V r;:y--2 y ir. &<-U44f( aA fC^ «•. Harch 4. 1977 Hr. OTson, Bullciing Inspector City of Orono Village Hall 1335 Brown Road South Oronot Minnesota Otar tir. Olson: Mere Is the survey you needed for the addition to ay house. I hope this is sufficient. 1 would also like to add a deck as I have outlined on the white xerox copy—any problem? The contractor who will be doing the work Is Lambln Construction In Excelsior. The man to contact at their office IsJUck Her- furth—474«5441. He has a copy of this survey. Sincerely* f U'i.^ t •*- Allan C. Grannes 4496 North Shore Drive • a. MAR ?* r 1 % ' '■ . ■, • « « I■■« •Mat of Surray for Allan C. Ctmi»a» of Uata I ai»d ?, B»iWal«t*» Sae«aid AddlUen to »«• MU Ntnnopin Cmaty* v». ">-wr -K>>. ■ •» • ■ -.- ■ ' •• *5 ■'lu *iif > • -I u i*' V ;^'4»aA ^ <- % ’ V.: • • ‘-a' *> 4 r»«f t^aa»»«*4r •«£»; itiva MMMwAv'^PAaM •>.r- ^ , I 4- - • ^ r wt>}^v ;-t / ■anta» If any* • t- . fj ir ^1. - ‘1*. I' '. •■ :• •■.■ * •.»«•- • g.. < • ... .• A - % •• # 4 • • • »'! ■ *:i.r '.T» . . . -* ■•' •*^:, *, *-V '■ ,* » . ,. ..: . •-? ;. • ■* ‘ '”r -' i'a* •* -V:4.A- •' ' *------ T -. •* V. : . - . . * . ^ 9 i , ,*v, .. ; .« %.■. ■• , >4-;ak«V •■.'• ScbU i I” » 40* Bit* t SM8*77 • I Iron mrirtr ■ T'A • * ,'■ ... -- -* • ,• •'-* , **4‘ • :. *.t * . ‘r k . , • . * V* #.. V-.’ ' • ‘r ». ., • . * ■* * * •- •,r*« . ^ ' . t •>; • ' . ■• r •,. • • • ••.• •. • : * / • .. ■ • ? • , . .-4 _ • t 4^3', '-t ^ ^ , *i •• » ' ^ . >• .w'v^JTw,. ■*• .y/_•;.•••(■. ;■£;’ '■ * *' 0.9 •4r .■%iff i ■;4' : •» ^' ti [ ■ % •. -VI cm OP 0MM>, nDi«asttCmditKml Uf» «nd VtrUnc* AppllLOOUIOI OP PROPOBM. (or proportf)A4diOSf 0^f¥ii ----Ufil OMcriptiaR X#T> /»a APPUDUr /L^/iiL C. piio>vz; ?97c Addrtss A^ofTM Z>ri OMA /7 Ptaw 9</?J 393f AdteMS f /7/>f <f ftosMt Zoning Z A**y^ Zpnini Oidlf Presont Uso >fVr-S JTV.yra. s^liy OidiiMnco Rinulf—nti z r >4V?>P - ^ umJ!^ -/V<?-- ConditiaMl Ow YnrUBCO MLprap Bm m OFFICIAL US ONUr OnneU Action Sto Oniod BipUitt Rigiiift SliCiVi to liRui th Extint of MBKonfoBdtp Htiddilpo to Propoftp Hbur louais for ngoB^inf tMi VOrinnct or Ce^tional U m Ponit WagRlAL IBCBSSAW WR . Qilist bo sitelttod 1 nook prior to CoHKil Nmin^ 1. AppUcntim oo^lotid 2. put Wp Sictien S. Sutvoy (Sttdi in prqpoool) Date l7 - / / - 7 fron ttampin Ooifity SgUtxtr of S. iS.WMo Sifowturo . v>. • }■ •« •.V;.-i ^ ' < • I / .. . •• ■i .1 ;• V < • »/ c- ?. s a Planning Conaission and Ccmcil ilank Hiiich, Zoning Administrator March 16, 1977Allaa Gnmes - 4496 North 9iora Drive Variance - Lot Area fcr Addition ____.* Mr. Gnmes is requesting a lot area variance for an additim to his misting dwelling. The lot aeets 801 of the let width requiraswnt. 'Iw pwpoaod addition would neet all setback reqiiircnents. The area of this lot is about 10,000 sq. It. short of the required 4S,S60 sq. ft. It does not neet 80t of the required area and, therefore, requiraa an area variance of about 10,000 sq. ft. lie inforaa ne the additicr. would not eaceed the heists of the tiiating stnictura PLMWLNC OCMaSSKM IGTIM: • mrdi 21, 1977 Conission racoramdad approval as proposed addition net all setback raquirHiti and there is no other land availd>le. It was also vocoHU;iidod that iapeirious naterial not be used in construction of the deck. GOUNCIL iEEIXMC • Much 28, 1977 Approved. SOggestod we adept policy regarding lakeshore setback for dudal. f ....'wn ^ V- •' |S- > ••••a »■ ^ V.-. ' •' «-i***- -**-•* *■ ^ V 4 » » ''C f. \ ‘ y\ y* 4 54 - in' j hr *1. , > V- ’<'>r 4 . X -yx s w« ■ I ■i ;'li"jf:?-tH ■1 I ’4 "Si'5 ri 1s ' J I J J ■1 ii • • •• \ l”.V.M-0 r »rMVl*r, 'I ril*/. !'.!:.H '!^’;i;- :i. l‘J7J> -• . ».' f-r!-r.tc, tliii, cuiticr wjtii!»x';!ap riow’tti, Hassel to ta}*lc tliib i^iltcr inorJer for t!.e appl i*:.-uit to coutart t'.c lu-ij.'iSors. •Vit'u^n • Ayes (5), Nays (0). K'atlii Mlis airiv«.-J a:vl t’lc* ?’V;:iniiijj ri*.r:5 ->ion .'uTvir'fJ of t)ic actiuii taVen earlier. Tiie aj«pl < at.t •»licre a prcpusal of this nature toulil !<c apnroveil in <'na»o. T*ic »’lo:inli(i; Co. :nissitin pointeJ out t!.e co. i.i*rt. ial area of I-on^i ’.il.e .uiJ a’vo in the Na\.irre area. Mr. IJavlcy was present, lie is re«iueslinK a'-.-ii-i il of a !.uiL’.iri}’ jeiriit for liis nrojjerty on !*i«’ Island. 'Hte "oning Ailninistraior pointed out the location of this prc|x.rty on the r.ip. Mr. Hawley slated that the nro- prsed location for this structure would he the saf*© as the previous pn<r)Osal in l'.*74. Tiic stmeture ucwild be a little hip^er,”ha.ever. ‘Hie runinc, A.lT.inisirator stated ti.at tl»e applicant was a*are of the fact liiat no public serv ’ices arc availai>le for Big Island. After a brief discussion, llaijuih lovcd, Hassel secanded, to recorjcrid approval cxi the basis tliat the lots be coiuiined atu! Uic scr.iic system l<c approwd by the City fjigineer. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (b). Tne Planning Cormission took action on the follcMing work session item: The Zoning .Administrator infornied the Commission that tlie applicant is requesting a lot area variance fo” an addition to his existing dwelling. Tlie proposed addition would teet all setback require;".cnts and would not exceed the heights of the existing structure. 0:5rilap roved, Guthrie seconded, to re'*®wend approval of this lot area variance or. the l>asis that no otltcr land is nv.*iilablc and proposed addition meets all set- tiiic). re'Hiirei'ients. .M so rccorncnded that inpervious ruiterial not be used in tJic construction of the deck. IV.tion - .Ayes (S), Nays (0). Mr. .'uci. Irveh-om ;in»l Clayton B.angs were present. ...e/ infonwd that this was a work session only. .**e ! Coirussiun was coiicenied almut tire >• ••. r* .»[> of the .ibutt iiig pro;iert/ and instructed ' Ml"iiiistr.ilor to investigate this riat»cr. •!AI;i:- :i. 197?.lie. Mr.nppi:^■ .it tins u:it iiLHsi)ielurr.«*d (•J)7) *»• • 'I' .... . I L M. hMHinilS 574D hAYlMA rVll'LLVA«Di c-ir.iin inMAL ihst i>:36) J.vn;s ilAUTJlY • BIG ISLAND (i-Ki.VUTIISLY STO BARl'GN) kj.vihw 19 7w Ai’I'aA'AL .ASuuuiiNc srni /VLUN GRAN.NnS 4496 NORHi SHORE DRI\*E VARIANTE • LOT AREA FOR AiMlITICN k.arre :^ ortbibud 186S SilADYHOQO WMD VARIANCX • uor wiorm («238) * \ * J f---------- '■'• V •’ . ** • «*'s. ?•. r 'y C, V’ 5! I I •Si i ktOULAR MEETIW OP THE ORONO COUNCIL HRIKH J», 1977 co«t..io« of H«ch 7.S“I“X?S*32";».rJSi..sr„K-K,-K_~i~^n rL“:rs "k~-« C«»i»»loii that ah* i:ni2Si p“ Council Nccting - March l*>, 1977 liBblcd on request of eppUcsnt. Council Meeting - March 29, 1977 varianee^Mwst^for Mra^^Casch^^iS??'®^ ^****Wd, for a fence* }H"HoJS'ShiJ;Sr rL:"in~vidth rMuiMfli 2?^ MMts 80% of %ho loi^«.Mr:S3:5 ‘;.,2;jsssr ^ short of tho*roqu<rod^Ij*s«o*ai*'*** *^' **' »ot aoat an orthi ramiJU **•- ** *»•• »»9»i»e. «. ara. varlaSc. of K;t“o:oo!!*j;f?r' 1^19115™ “a’^MlIuiirSrlSSiJ,?®* Pege SVAKIANCE• 199Mrs. Robert Gaach • w ♦ • r. • •'•a* • -a . ^nainmdiM 449€ •240 "r Allan Grannaa J !- • V * * • ■ W f j-•'•'it’-'ts^ I <« ?c‘ V-J :-‘.t - >1♦ <k I *• 't • 1 M'l ‘1 r 4 5•i .i f1 HKGULAR MEETING OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MARCH 2t^ 1977Planning Conmission Meeting - March 21, 1977The Planning Comnission reccmtended approval as proposed addition meets all setback lequire- nents and there is no other land available. It slso reconnended that isgtervious material not be used in the construction of the deck.Council Meeting - March 29, 1977 9utler moved9 Paurus seconded^ to approve the variance request of Allan Grannes, 4496 north Shore Drive, per the Planning Co^ission Minutes of March 21, 1977, subject !• Meeting all setback requirements. 2. Utilizing pervious materials. 3. Uo other land available. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Mr. Joto Bonner, representing Ski-Tonka, discussed with the City Council Ski-Tonka*s request for e licenM to operate Phase I. Mr. Bonner stated that he /P^Ared at the Council Chambers for the March 14, 1977 scheduled Council meeting but the ChaAbers were dark. Mr. Van Nest infoMd Council meetinghad been cancelled for lack of a quorum and had At 7i00 P.M.,as the Minutes of that evening indicate. MX, BonMr commented that the tow lines have imprwed since the last report and Ski-Tonka does not fully agree with Mr. Alan Olsen's letter on commented that Mr. Olson's Original AAAclusions and appears to me that it is clear and decisive. Page 6VARIANCB4496 North Shore Drive (Continued) SKI-TONKA LXCBNSB Phase Z ;• ■r.-i Ki ./‘•.A 5) Mayor Van Nest read the conclusionst 1. •* e 3 4 Review of signing for conformity. Do you agree? Mr. Bonneri That's OX. Rcmjval of brush and other tow line obstructions. Do you agree? Mr. Bonners That's OK. V'.»- •T» (Continued) ■i; ■«a4 ■ i.;c*•r ■ ' V‘‘ ,•■ -*>> /■' V 4:m •' ■».' . w r»f V* .(V m ►Av.v- . j. r % / ' I 5. lOs Plaiinin9 Co«iil®*io*' Chair®an K®ll®y Planning Conaiiaaion Nanbars City Adniniatrator Barnhardaon it DBTBt SOBJl Michaal Gaffron, Aaat. Planning ft Zoning Adniniatrator Juna 15# 1986 #1280 wandy Haiha# 1376 Baldur Park Road - Variancaa Sacond Raviaw i;jLat of Bahibita - D - NaoK> 6 Bxhibita of Juna 2# 1988 DiaenaaiM - , ^ maating# Planning Commiaaion tablad thia application# th. P-r“\n“.dyit”r AVfrw»*iu.^tS ’"and ovarall hardcovar on tha proparty. In addition# atatt waa ^•viaw tha aaaaa»nt aituation on tha proparty- ADolication haa providad a raviaad plan ahowing a dacraaaa in of tha^propoaad addition, and aonawhat raviaing tha dack configurat Tha varianca for garaga to houaa aatback ia no longar nacaaaary. I will raviaw tha two iaauaa of aaaamanta and hardcovar taparatalyi TO."IppUc.nt ha. r.vl..d hardcoTer Wn*thiV5-25o‘5*^:?SaV«n.'!°"^ r th. djck inataad of ll- out iS raaulta only in a hardcover dacraaaa of 6 a.f. from the rirat propo* the 0-75* tone. fssri "K K:‘;fs.i“.s^!*ss3r;...’s:; r*..Ks..s 0-75* Total Hardcovar Exiatinq 30.4% Original lat Propoaed 30.0% Corrected lat Raviaad Propoaal Propoaal ju.«a jw.u* 30.1% 30.0% (3282 s.f.) (3244 a.f.) (3248 a.f.) (3242 a.f.) Allowed 5% (0) 75-250*(1298‘a?f.) (1234‘l!f.) (1177‘a!f.) (1032 a.f.) (663 a.f.) Aa you can aee# in the 0-75*# there ia 0-75^^»n^75" hardcover propoaed# about 40 a.f. from the . 266 a f from the250* zonea, the total hardcover ia reduced by about 266 a.f. J mAA • % ‘i % ' il » '4 ■X • • jr » A » / % '->•*. Zoning Pil® #1280 June 15, 1988 . r..ov.l o, .bout l/5th of th. pr.-.xi.tin, h.rdcov.r i» ««. 75-250' .on.. ,.,.rdin, .tructur.1 h.rdco,.r, r.f.r to th. follo-in, t.bl.. Structural tardoouur 0-75* (H) 75-250' 0-75* (8) Existing 1515 sTf. 637 s.f. 0 s.f. 1950 s.iT Corrected 1st proyl2140 8.x. 722 s.f. 0 >ef_eTOT sTt: Revised Proposal 2134 8.x. 637 s.f. 0 s.f^Trnrrr: (<f912 s.f.) (‘♦•821 s.f.) ,hi. t.bi. indict.. th.t in tb s;:=‘;cr.\'i-ict"i" ‘;k ‘5^ originnliy propo..d Jlilin.t..*^ .11 th. pr.viou.ly propo».d i^SIti'c.*’ .tc'cccl“SScver. Icuin, only th. ci.tin, Sine, your tli«iSUJd f?c 'pA^c 1^cr*~* •‘rlSScl*c.^“tr”‘42V:::r."^t%,^^^^^ b.rdc«r th.« ..i.« non. •• •nnSSiiiSIS. ...««■“• “ ‘nr*:^^;o;Sii'c\«%Vr‘^i“f2.t‘r"f with the 2 documents which are ** tS b? Bill Franklin who ^irie. The first one is the lUement was Ranted in 1948 when appeared at your last j^g^o^iginal owner (who also applicant's ooint, and perhaps owned the owned property to Box/ud\ reserved an easement over Lot 20 SS\"h\’i ^uY;M».‘ ^fVcc^^VVeir propcty on th. point. Th.t e...»ent i. ««»«i^*fa*;ot*’c".wludia'’*»« *hSIlCbi;n*r ’;.TorpVrvcc. ”>Viv*J?“tS‘.t^“t dr/*no't -«c?Sc w“icbthe validity of that easem^t 9^^® . only names the people who purview .t thi. tic ^ ^ The second document P*°''^^*^-^».^J^er,**oorporation»f regarding the of a mortgage agreement between 2 financial P® ^hich describes an sale of Lot 30,^ Baldur Park, t:rsUocb?e*raUdm."°W»“eve?r“it%* l.ngu.g; .1.0 discusses merely .n ¥"■ ^ “ m-. i 4 i W L • 34.- j ^•. .r *' ’ r'- .♦: i ✓ ; I’*. . •b-. fe ‘ 4 . i ft »* J V . H • 0' i'.: : * t *. f* . / •?«*r2 . A I t i;i :.jfar. if Zoning File #1280 June 1S» 1988 Page 3 of 3 for driveway purpoaea# hence neither of the eaaepenta in wlictit. Chain of title h.v. . .Igniflc.nt .ff.ct on thl. wu“tlon. »ey ^ hn*. . .Ignlficnt eff«:t in th. fntnr. d.vlop-nt of propertiea to the north of applicanta property. rhMfc one of Mr. Pranklin'a concerna waa that applicant would r..ov.‘’“,«vVl «*h«dr«f.c. fro- th. .ro. f«\“Anno\"lVoVAy“~;: aec... to hia propartiaa. Iha fact ia, applicant cannot legally ra-o« Miatino outside her property boundaries# and probably should not Srdw».r^«lttln prSparty that i. ».«i by “y ‘‘Vi'*”: TlnTcurrent propoaal doea not indicate that any rewovala which would be detrivental to any potential eaaea»nt holdera are propoaed. *^^s5f *otea^aga in that the iMgnitude of the propoaed i* EouaeMost of the 3* narrowing of the deck at the lakeside of the house SSTaian w by additio”.! ”t.lra.y located in th. .... •J**- Staff would auggaat that a deck of no -ota than 4 tK l.ke.ide of the hou.e, with the •t«i*»«yhouae and incorporated into the new deck structure at that location. Since the setback between garage and house now doea not need a vm^j^ancOf bha raguaatad variancaa ara aa followat 1. Additional atructura in 0-75* aona. 2. 30.0% hardcovar in 0-75* aona. 3. 38.9% hardcovar in 75-250* aona (25% allowadi. thia application in relation to the property ownara righta. v; A- • • f-ea < .4*r •> *• y h (! ■ f i. V t # ^ ■ ■■tr- T* 'i‘,» > %•* #» r ‘ fc'. > 1 1 i 1 *. t I I r.:-% I. h.^ ‘ M4* •>i 1 % f** :l t .-# :> * . 4'V w 1^ is-M T -V '* ‘ ‘ . • I • - ‘ ‘ • • •/ ’ • ^\ { . ' ■ - * • V« ’ • _ •T T , $ I 1 I I • / u A^ i.u ►%r ! . I * •rs % 1 ^ \ J I *'-'? i-* *■ '▼ ' jj'-^ -•:,^':.j i|l 'M'-V ' ] ®v <*>1. ^l * i "'^ir V . 'h-- ^ « '" V if ‘-' ■, 4^ t m i ♦ r '■ ♦ # Is i T h 'V ' .< 5 .1 .4 w I m ■f'! •r %. ■' f 'i-J il t •• ■? >• ■ '*.i'*- ■ f 'f *Efe- ^%9 1 •'->• r • I r' •. \ --- \ *P< .‘V' ■ ,'V ■ / •• f i . r* .1 >•%fM “I rii^» 4» F'5'A ©-"7r: 7r*2^rt ; (i|) P«CKS (c ) 5 ©tOAULS ')>^/l/6WAY (S> (.-'f'r-ZI.S'/z, P r'yzr? K A vV« « •(pi|p,tn/ev>'^ 2 /. i X'^U-2-e ;/t3 .X s ->^ S>xzz~- 1?6»S ^ uy2^i = ;2.G-s 1 ■ ■ ^ s-syN = /O*/s X 8//V ^ ;/2-^ .X 3C ^ X ' //2-i X . .. /yx/y ’ nc 5 X __ 8x/o - 80 5 X 4.X/A ?= fc<i ^ X 2-xa ' /c X 3/*/*■ 12-X 0 ^x/7 * S7 X . ; 3X/0 - SO X ,— . - . 2.x 2 - c »ii^ mm»-rn mim ^X . • •• •= 3C /x33. % = '33 t • -• \XfO = /o Cz-'^c*:) 2-0.2 vzV.i f.rX2C..2_ }\y(-7- Tcr/vt- ^ 70 * 25L» ■ /SC ' ^,^7 -= &e"2 ^ /yo ^^7 ^ s:G. i. -r ^ #?< ,X ,\' X 1^^. -v^ y / •. 0-1^'•• •7r'*'^ -S2.Y2- 10'>'2' \ v„ # F a ■ ■• 4 .m i * « ^ ' { ’ j V: ' ^ ■"v . -y-1’,!^ |PF« r •> -. ‘ • j» i' < >■ Vf,. /• ; 14 O 5 QL V-* ^ ‘4’. **r! ** «. I > 1 It I ii S h « 1-1 I if j s: I 'C e CvC/ ’ITHz ^21*i i tliif=-wXiJ •-t r r;cr . T ‘ I V.s > T “ ft. !H —. €.H -» I 4 5 *c 0 J?S ^ •. § 1 k -j I « Cl 1 i: ! i 3 *“1", <-*', '«♦. 9 ? ^ ^ » •IC 5 1. :.*. A i m Hi k,i L «#•• It) ? Voi 5 I 0=0- /^ o-K. >5 <3/ .-N > 4 k2 i*‘I s •f nS I • I 5i s 4 4 ts X C •M. 1 Oo > l| •4 4 /O 14 (0 ll I 0»J c4 ifua I s O t #1 4 Jc •• 4 0<v J 3 1 Jo V > I O t e t* itr •f c« 0o1 § itr J N> =rr. _ ^=1-. '7 If W', r / ♦ ,;* M 1' , » ' -f t'i*'-■1^- G*CGO«Y O. GlfSIAFSON DANIEL B. TVaON WILLIAM M. NAMCHT JOSEPH J. DEUHS, JB. SABAH Z-EMCnON GimFsoN & Tyson, FA. ArroBNBm/ffuwr SUITE 411 T4MMETB0 80ULEVMai EDINA. MIMNBSOfA SMM mEFMONB (Bit) BW7S7T June ID. 1988 Mr. Michael P. Gaffren ..... Assistant Planning 6 Zoning Admxnstrator City of Orono City Hall p.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Wendy Weihe (Easement Problem Question) Our File Ilo.i DRT-87-4388 Dear Mikes I have enclosed herewith photocopies of the easements which api»«- of record against Wendy Weihe's Property. These easements are filed Document No. 2513998 and Document No. 1440581. After review of the enclosed, please contact me with regard to your comments. Sincerely yours, GUSTAFSON 6 TYSON, P.A. Tyson DRT s kay Enclosure cc: Wendy Weihe . j: A »• ■ .V i .. * 'Vv H J i V if} < 4 . h ‘/ ) I I / MORTGAGEI i‘i ::•«! l^th ScptcriisrJIIIN MON l(> Mil 1% mj.k- rtn» ...................................................(fan •<! ........................................... ............ N Ikr ..........NDRH.CD FINANCIAL OOWnRA^TlOtl. A MIWCSOTA COM^T^ .......................................................iHcirifi ami Hie jfvt. MIDWI-ST MJM.IIAI. SAVINCiH AMI lOAN A%S(K*IATI0M ()!■ MINNt*AP(MJ5. a i*t«|ii«a...m larfam/cil «nl eaMi^ wmkf Hie b«% «H fill I'MTI.n SIATI.% OF AMiiRICA. mbmt ailJrv%% m «I1 HKtnXKf MALL. MIHNEAflU m. MNNiiSOTA liefeiii **lArmlirt**l Wmm \\ lk«fimer •% unleNeii Iti Lemkf in die fvimrifai mim i€ .... .WKSlYrMW. *DIJU5AND. AND.MQ/tOQ ....................... Yf • • iM#f...........................Oidlafa. mlikli imicNeiimMi b <»MeReeHlijr iiwie Hueit............. diefel# **N<iti**t. puttkinf ftw hd^taL mtHi Hie Mamx *if H» ii^eKieiiwrm. if mm mmmn paid. Hue mi paaaMetm A"............................. rtiSm ■» M all HHicf Hie f«fftmaiK«af die eimiawdi mI a ireciae mi af l«m«rcr biteHi trrntkmi. mH til lipHyteid id u. y l» Lead er. Jal so. Block 1. ft.Tk»« accordlAf to tht "**'^«‘»**^ jtetothir with on eoicwnt ooor ■djouiim uolll i6f |j)Tiflll BPil ijfiUw includini Mptle tank and drain fiald» Indudint tha rieit of Snirasf and agrasa to aninUin and rapair aald syaten. Tcgathar wioi a nonexelualra aaaanaat for driraway ptnpeaaa ctrar a atrip of land 12 fact in width, tha canter lina tharaof being daacribed u foUow: Co—ncing at the NoithMaaterly comer of lot 20. Hock 1, 'Valdlir Piffc"t thMica Sautheastady along the SouthMcaterly lina of aald lot 20 a diatanca of 2f.f feet to tha point of bagiming of tha lina to be daacribedt timea at an angle to tha left of 132* 10* a diatanca of S2.ll feet; tka nca at an angle to tha right of 14* S3* a diatanca of 47.1 feat; thanca at an angle to tha left of 14* S3* a diataica of 40.$ foot; thence at an angle to tha left of 26* SS* a diatanea of SS.47 feet toangle a point on the Nerthweaterly line of Lot 21 in aald Block 1 «*AaUnt 122.7 fbat Itorth easterly of tha Northweatarly ooraar of aaid lot 21t thence at m Mia to the left of 14* 11* a diatanca of 212 feat; thanca at an angle to tiia loft of 14* 20* a distance of 21$ feat nora or lass to tha Southaastarly lina of Let U, Blod; 1, *midur Nik'* and there tatadnating. which hj% the mkJrcM nf... .PfTK IVWI.............................a ••••••• •••••a ............ lllfttl I ICHrt .............................................(herein -frofcny Addrchh**!; |hldle«n#/#c«#el I mil INI II with alt Oh: iiiipfit%ciiK*tiih'n«m iir Iwrvaficr efvclcil ini the pt(^*rty« imi til cmciiicnli. fifldt. appunvtuiHY^. niiK ro^ahiev niiiKrtat. «nl «ml $»% rlnhu ami prnfllh. water, water rigta. and water tlncl. and all rikiiifin iiitw i»f iHTvaficr .iitaclwtl to ilu* pf«*pert), all 4il which, iitcluding re|Haeemcn(i and odditH***% therctn. ohall he ttvcnHHt io hs‘ anil rrmjin a part ••( the pntperty cmcrcd h> ihK hliHtga|e; and all id the fnrcfoing. Nifether with hokl PM»Pcri\ tor ihc tcan'lndd r%iaic if ihi% Mnrtgaec i% ini a tcahchnldl are herein referred In oi (fic “Properly**. Ih If row if iiUi'nanin that llorruwcr LiwfiilK m'ihhI •*( iIh* eMaie licrchy ctniveyvd and hih Ihe right lo grant and ci«n%i*% itu* Pfopctit. iltai I he Pr«»|vri\ in tani'iKuiiiK'rcd. and that Ilorruwef will warianl and defend j^nerolly Oh* mil ii* Oh l•l•»^xfl> against all claims and ikniuiidh. %uhj\*ct to dedaralhmt. eohenienu or rviirkiiiiiih iH record, if any. MINNtSOU I it4tgNi«ig I ;y tmufimm wihnii MUMiniit iMtnwii : ' ^ *. 4 S Book-lV§£l^afire ”184 Inbenttire.V—-*i». i# ia , Arn<;\d R. Boxrud igid lUjf^llt 9. Bennid, husband and wlltp mf%k»CmmmHt4 BaruiepiO . . a»d du«t I^^I^OOta . . Joho^abrln and mrla^Jfa^rlIl• buabaod and•/ iks /Irwt paH. aad Ifann^pln ««d AM<« •/klanaaota , 0/ IA« C<n«n/K •/ , •/ Iks wiwwW fMirf. Wtiuaaefl. ra«l IA« mJd a«Hlaa •/ fS« /UtS tm rsmihtemstHm mf Iks sum mfci.r DaiAT a;© onm valuable :c?»r:DniAncN5. -..............BOLuns, I0 thac im kumd ^Id kp Iks mid pnHiss s( Iks sssmmd fuH, Iks rsssipi Ufkrrsm/ Is kmmkp stri rnmrt- uifsd. ds ksfrkp Grunt, Bril, mnd Cs0vrp M«fa fA« mid tmrtlss m/ Ikr mfrtmd purl us futmf frmnnts umd nut us trnunts in rsmmnm, tkMr urdgns, Iks sundrus nf mU pmrliss, mnd Iks krirt mml ^»mgmsp/ Iks suft-irur, Fsrsiur, mil tkr trmrik sr purrs I * •/ faaW Iping mmd krlmf Im Iks rmmmly «./ rn^;»ln Stntr •/ ,Uimmssslm, drseriksd ms /mllssrs, Im^m*!: :n (20), ?l^ck (Y.a (1), tn Paldur Park, *nd r»<-“vlrr Ir tP* !n, th^lr sealrn^, -i: rv!vnr Lrd 1:* kn^iprn ri i^n surv ’vrr, an aaa^nanl f^p irlv-*«T rv^r prrll^n 01 aald In da^crlb^d at trv: a*., t?.** Trulhaat t^r It corner n aald Ln. L*0; lh*nra Tiertha^ 1 i*ply rn L*-- lln* n tald T^pV 20, dlatant <A.O l••t; tVpr* • t-r)▼ to a ^olnt on tha Nopih»«s t**rly lino ol aald Lot -O distant 4; .r :'*ol :>rthoaat*rlr ;poe. Uio 5oulh«€s tapir copoor o| said Lot ' thorra ?ori*rl T on tb- J.orlhao'* t*rly line of said Let r?C, dl^loni •*“ .0 t^‘‘rc• Sou t^»eit*rlr to tha place of top^lrrlnf mj* nna l*lf c\il, and ihat part of Lot Taenty-ona (21), Block Ono (1) In Baldur fark doacplbod n* lonoat: Cnta*nclP.»r at the loand*r lino on th* korthaat t* »ly com»p ol twld U't 2.; ih-^nco ::ort»i«eaterly rn aald lli>e dlatant 00,0 to th- ^rrt^.w•ateplr corr.or ol anld Lni 21; th*nco Southwettoply on ib* %''rtba*at*rl7 lire ol *:ri!d Lot 21, ilalant 2S, M*t; t!.'»nce t»-V* ■ T'^lrt on th* Southeaatorlr lino CC/5 fe*t Soothaeatarly *rot C* ^orr*r; t^:**?!.** !.‘crthaaat»*ply on tha T-outhaaf-i'rlr Hna :«at to tV plne^ b^rlrr.lnr* TsgHkrr sntk all tks hsrmdsti aala ksUm{sm£ ms «a umpmisr mpfmrimtmusg, tm Iks aald pmsfsm mf lAa mmsmd puef. fAnr «a«^a«, tks me* rituea/aald pmshsm,mmd Urn kssrs mmd msmfms mf tkm sum mis ms, /ao nar , tV aa^ b^mIsss mi Iks mrumd fmkimi ms /n»ml ksmmmts mstd aaf ms IrmmmIs tm rmsmsmmm, judiksumsd Arnold .1, Joxrud cjid lAjhallo 2. Boxnad l^mmflks fr^ Buri.fsm thefc.StlTOj, Uioir ksism, mmsruSmrm mmd mdmsmtstrulmfrs dm rrntnmmml snik fkr smsd muriim mf Iks sssmmd pmsi, Utsir ssssifus, tkm surrirsmsf mtd pmrfiss, mtsd tks kr*» • mud mtsigmsmftks smswirms, lAaf Uxe/ OTO irWI ssissd U fms mf tks Umds mmd $smmtms mf^s^td km Ve fund rifkf a* aII «»d ««atra tks smrus Im smmmmss mtsd fmrsm mfssmmid. mmd tkmt tks rnssss m»* fwms frmns m»t •msumkmssrsu, • dmd tks mkms kmrgmsmsd mmd frumtmd ImsuU mmd mrsmissm, im tks fusst mmd fsurs^kir p sMtsmnmm mf ft r •mtd mmsrtrs mf |4# smrmmd mmrt, Ikssr mssifms, tks mmssswum mf smtd mmsSsss, mmd tks kfl*m mmd muBfms mf fk* 9m»dtus_ mfmtmsS mV rrr^iM Imtsfmllp rdmimnimg mm »m simisu tks srkmls mm mmp pmmt tkmrmmf, sukprrt f* tf mmp. ksmmimkmfmmm smmmttmsssd, tkm mm»4 pmH lea •/ tks fUrt /mri intll ■*a«r«a# mmd Hsfsmd H CratUpoap iUcttaC Tks mmtd pmnikm mf tks flrd km ksrnmumtmmt th^lP kmmd^ tks dmp mmd pmum fLmst mkssm ssrittsm tm k'ltmm. ,f /tU ykA.lC / ] S. I t ■•'r'r--'.. o( iM(niu<ota, | OnikU . .. --Jloturauftiblla -------------dS9 0f kn Boole-1732-p«^e IHh .»« l«/ar« tmk, m ^ wWUm mmd fm kkid CmmUt* xrjid Poaoniil^httsb^nd and-wify «• MM &Mm uu ~ rw ^----------------fji, m4 aHU iJnwiiiJ fA« fwr*t$Vkg . - ■ ■ AiKtrf»rf^4 1X4^ i JU 7. iiwiiiii/ ilU miim •« - ihoijp - —----frm mH mJL dmJL________ POTSi TU Mgm fl^nopln A*. ,l»yT^ t>*>< ..c'.Jil : ^ .....::‘.-V.4 !•* ' **\ Vi*>:p / rtl*« f*r raeari a> tka 1? 4iv aC M A.SI. >9^ •» UllO A.H^ Cbta Jn2itnture 25U00I HD Book-1732-Page nirc, UJm A«y Mf __ w4 gjibtcJUjkf^ig hiibind ■»< mXI m . /# kfikkOrntm^kf lUnnepla IMH im kf tkk gkkt pmH^ mmd .fl l^EWk ______________ mf tk0 eW i^jr •/ 7^7 #ff4« fWompla V kkhmmd^mUh^tkktM pmH kf tk» ^tk< dm . WeftB MM, mM Cmmm^ hU . . ojU mi IM feiw. #11 M ( «/ iA« mf MLUBM. Oa mid pmHJ •a/WlMTt l^aborod Tipo (S}^ Slock Sunbcrcd Too (?)^ VUsilrwc* Ad4*fi to ItinMtpolit^ •cconSlitK to tho plat ihoroof cm fllo and of rtcerd In tho ortleo of ^ Soclotor of Poodi la and for HamapUi laonty^ Mtnnatoia» Inclodtni ao7 port or portUn of aaj atraat or allov adjacent to said prailtto haratofera vacated or to bo racatod, tecaUvar vith all rlidita^ orlrlltfoi^ •*^«=*“ta and apporiananoaa tharaonto attacnod or bolenctnf* Sub>ri to a cortoia firot aarteocP to Klnraao^ fadarol Sarta^ and Loan laaoclitioa noo of rooord. ''Sobjact to taxof and a>«<9aaaanta, incltiding Oofarrod painooU fop •paclal asaaaoaanta, not pot pc*«blo, tobjaet to oKldi iMa eonvapaneo la aada. UkiUgfikm mM all lAa . i# Ita mU pmH mf Uu_-------------------------,--------^ ---------— pa^ hid- Jmd fXa «ald.Jloboct^L^B0x3Maa.aaAJtlhiCJlaJltn»jUUlnub»9<^ and wLfa________ mdmUlHrmim% 4a» . _paraitt-. #/ %km pmrf, /«r.thoaaalTaa^thoix____ OMaaaal aOt Ma Mid pari .X • af Ik# aMwl paHL hid. •P»fl mimd U /m •< Ida laada aad pmmims m/mmmid, aad Aa-ld_____pa^ H7U la aaU aad aaaaap UU aama U »<aaaar aad fara* a/aaaaald. aad Idai Ida aaaw ara frm fmm sit ismmsUtmmm oacopt aa abonra amaaaratad. ‘ .Isim aad mmt/m, ltaf.th«X*dr4L & Hi %■-:. “■ ■' I . i * *« . > 1 ii s^y-1 !/ 11 U> ‘ i^w tao > - i) TO: DATES SOBJs Planning Cominission Chairman Kelley planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning A Zoning Administrator June 2, 1988 •1280 Wendy Weihe, 1376 Baldur Park Road - variances - Public Hearing /■c #*■ . L. soniag OUtrict - LR-IC single Fa.Uy 1/2 Acre Sewered Knpltcation - Hatdoovet and lakeshore setback variances to construct aajor additions to existing residence. List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Letter from neighboring property owner E - Survey ^ teF - Hardcover calculations by applicant and start G - Plan of existing hardcover to be removed H - Plan of proposed new hardcover , « I - Elevation views of proposed additions and floor plans j - LR-IC Contemporary variance listing K - 1982 Preliminary Plat of Baldur Park Point Pertinen^Fa^^^^^^^^^ is proposing to construct additions to the pvijs^inQ housGf ss foXXowssa. Construct a second story over existing one story room addition. b. Construct an addition between the house and garage which will include a 3-season porch, storage area, master bedroom suite, and a turret-type deck area at third story lc»vel. c. Remove the existing deck and construct a larger deck extending westward from the new living room a^ea created in item (a) above* 2. The entire existing house is within the 0-75* setback zone. The house is currently 28* from the of Lake Minnetonka. Virtually all of the proposed additions will take place in the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. 3. Staff has reviewed and slightly revised hardcover calculations per Exhibits F attached and follows (note that 0-75* figures include both north and south zones): 4 ■ ^ T . ? » i%.ti \' • .1,v > V . 1 1 ' J > • h- I- i t i-1 *;. ** \ ‘ *•► V U- f ‘ /) ,^’S PI |J / ^ ^ #V ^ . Zoning File #1280^ Page 2 0-75* 75-250* rt / I - t • -o Cw « ) S ' ' Existing 30.4% 49.0% Proposed 30.0% 46.6% ->c jc-J V/'"| 4. Although the hardcover does show slight decreases in both 0-75* and 75-250* zones, the applicant*s intent is to increase structural hardcover on the property by half again as nuch as now exists. The structural increases are in additional decks and in additional structure. The structural hardcover changes are as follows: 0-75* (N) 75-250* 0-75* (S) Existing 1,313 s.f. 637 s.f. _ _ _ _ _ 1,950 s.f. Proposed “2,157 s.f. 709 s.f. —0 s.f. 2,866 s.f. i7 Net Change -f916.s.f. 5. The proposed hardcover removals and additions are shown on applicants diagrams which are listed as Exhibits G and H. Note that the existing deck of width 9.4* will extend approximately 1.5* closer to the lake, according to the design plans. Also, because the existing second story deck above the westerly room will become a living room, applicant is proposing a deck expansion to the west. 6. Note that the additional room expansion, where there currently is no structural hardcover, is between the house and the garage, where it will have no significant visual impact from the northerly lake, but will be quite visible from the west. 7. Applicant is proposing a 5* separation between the new construction and the existing garage, with the new addition to be architecturally attached to the garage by a covered walkway. From a zoning code standpoint, this would appear to require a variance to the requirement of 10* separation between buildings. From a fire safety standpoint, the garage and the house can be constructed with the appropriate fire walls so that building code standards can be met. 8. Note that the proposed additions will be constructed to meet the side setback requirement of 10*. 9. The current structure jutting above the house does B>eet the required 30* maximum height limitation. i< I - •i ■■ •A ■' .i ' j l 0 4(%i \ ? * f . V .V V V • ' 1 J %i%I .*•, - ■*4t 4 . f, / • \ t ) , ,1^ . • # r i I • 1 « •i t •j i •• I 1 Zoning File #1280 Page 3 10. Staff would suggest that this property certainly has sone unique circumstances and hardships# given that it is sandwiched between two shorelines. This situation occurs along Baldur Park and along Fagerness Point Road# both areas in which a number of variances have been granted in recent years. Attached as Exhibit J is a listing of the variances that have been granted in recent years in these two similarly situated and similarly zoned areas. Although hardships and unique circumstances will vary from application to application# the information presented should provide Planning Commission with some sense of the degree or magnitude of variances that have been consistently approved. 11. A summary of the necessary variances is as follows: a. 0-75' hardcover. b. 75-250' hardcover, c. Additional structure in 0-75* zone# including the concomitant grading and excavation associated with such construction. d. 5' structure-to-structure setback variance. Additional Items of Concern - The property owners directly adjacent to the property# the Keesling's# have submitted a letter supporting the application# stating that their views will not be hindered and that the addition would be a beneficial wind block for their house. Note that the Keesling roof drainage may tend to flow somewhat across the applicants yard area. If the additions were constructed# staff would recommend that the drainage be allowed to flow to the southwest onto the flat area of applicants's property to enhance infiltration. Note also that at applicant's property# the City no longer maintains Baldur Park Road# and it serves merely as a driveway serving applicant and the residents at the tip of Baldur Park Point. It would appear with the proposed driveway plan that applicant could park two cars in the garage and two more cars on the driveway apron within the property boundaries# without affecting that continuing driveway. Staff would express the concern however that, if the property at the end of Baldur Park Road is developed at some point in the future# the City may require that a private road outlot be dedicated# with the potential that public road dedication be required. While this has not been discussed at any great length recently, a past application to divide the point into three total lots had received preliminary approval# with a cul-de-sac directly adjacent to the applicant's driveway (see Exhibit K). Based on that preliminary approval# applicant's proposed deck would end up 10' from the edge of the cul-de-sac dedicated for Baldur Park Road# and a portion of applicant's property would be dedicated for Baldur Park Road. I . i • mkfm Sfv U • i '1 •4 ii • • I ‘ ' : J i-i- • ^ "V% ^7)?: v's’j r i « . '.< • . Zoning File #1280 Page 4 Staff views this application as similar to the request by Denny uilliams at 1932 Pagerness Point Road in 1985» in which a ^eiitiJel? S»all cabin «as allowed to be ttansfotmed into a larger residence, located only 26’ or so from the lakeshore. Visually, staff believes this application, generate the same comments and criticism from the public * tSe Milliams appt-val, and generally “‘^^t be Received « an unusual approval. However, again be reminded that this property has unique circumstances and hardships that may in fa provide a basis for some type of approval. Staff would question the appropriateness of the aPP^^®^'® elimination of an existing deck over a living space, thereby necessitating sideward encroachment into the 0-75 zone to create a new deck. ^While the raw hardcover percentages show a slight Lcreasrwith this proposal, the structural hardcover increases as a result of deck apace would appear excessive. Staff does not find any hardship to justify deck encroaching closer to the lake than the existing deck, and would recommend that the deck portion on the lake side of the house be eliminated, with a stairway l«^®ted within the newer deck ^ at the west end of the hosue, if in fa®^^**® P^°P°®® approved. Staff would also note that the sidewalks proposal have been minimized to include just those which are necessary. Note that there is no below-grade basement for this house, but ?he existing lower floor is used essentially as a basem^ent currently, and the owner notes it has some water problems. Note that all new additions must have floor levels no lower tha * elevation 932.5 MSL. staff Recommendation - Staff would recommend that Planning Commission review the application in relation to what has been approved Tn o^ with an eye toward reducing the degree of lateral structural hardcover increase, and reducing to the^ greatest extent possible the continued ®"f decks on the northerly lake side of the house. Also, Planning ?ILlssion n%h°t consider whether the addition of the turret room above the roofline will perceptually add greatly t® the bulk the house, and whether its elimination would make this structure visually less obtrusive; but remember that the ha consistently recommended that additions upwards, not laterally, and the turret meets the 30* height limit But IS over new structure. The proposal appears somew excessive in ha-r3cover, in relation to P®®V’^P"®^®^® ^he situations. Planning Commission must consider the property owner weighed against the Potential detriment to t^ health, safety and welfare of the community and the intent of the LR-IC zoning district. ♦I I 1 I ■i >' * y , ; - I ' 1 ( * # . . i ’ i 1 I Yt-—cm OP (ffiOHO *> VARIAMCB APPLICATIOHInitial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional v<Renewal Variance Fee $75.00(no change from original application) After-tle-Fact Fees (Double application fee)o o A o CITY OF DROHQ PROPBRTr LOCATXOH Site Address ^P. FIM^UCE OFFICE 1350200000 4 01 CEH 200.00 CHECK 71 200.00 V ProDertv Id*’*'ti fication Number (P.I.D.) *“ / ^ud^CLraropeiTTiy xa ticatxon Huwoet ir.x.w./ —g ---LLL_£--------------^79160 COOl ROl 714:41 /Please checlc one - Property abstract or Lorrens? CEIPT-THANK YOU »] 7U 04/2Sm Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name (A/&MPY L-. Address t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ b Phone (home) ^*7 I / _______ Phone (woric) City» ^P-Of^o Zip:5yjI Phone (home) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zipt Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT 08E OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential _________ Other (specify) __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ • mm mm mm amm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm «■. Mi ■■ mm mm mm •• «■. mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm »m mm mm mm i 5CRIPTI08 OP RBQOEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^uest in detail: ^Describe request in detail: 6 11/1*P~O^VC^ j A \ TlO P^ck VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setbac)c Variances (Front Side Rear) Other Se^TB/9CIC ^a/Z AD^/Tf<f^S Tb T, /f-o • J B 1 3 • f \/ V • • / 1 *. fe'fiABDSBIP letDescribe undue hardship or practica^ di^ficu^^yenforcement of zoning regulationst ^y.f7i^(/cz_i.0:cl "'RTPTTOH OF miOSOAL PROPBkTY COHDITIOHS i . ^ .Describe unusual property conations PI«*f"‘i23 5'°!!^^,®'^ code Requiresusnts. &!<,T. ^ RBQOUtBD SUBMITTALS 1. 2.CMtifild P^^rty^^erT list of omers Sente?this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A 603 Govt Ce te St?»yedV'legal sited envelopes (110) pre-addressed f* names on the^above list with no return address (use address labels3. list). 4. 5. CMtifi?ati’?£ Vu^?ey^in'?T^ding‘hardcover calculations as requir_^. T???gra?hi? survey (existing 2nd proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposede Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). «_«a.^ iiKt- rfAS an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list cf any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6. 7. The ADDlicant and Property Owner must sign this application. tS2t “ur va?ian« application is not complete if the above information has not been included. _ _ _ _ __ Certi«ciltion*to**onlng Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official’s Signature Date agrees to provide all information " reauested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all unusual expenses incurred in review of this his/herthe information supplied^is true an^ correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. ^ Jy ^ \y Applicant's Signature Date \ ?Sr?tne*^^y ackowledges and agree, to this «fPli=»tion and furt^ ISrtMlzes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investig tion and verificatipn;^f this reqjjest. / owner's signatur?^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _■>»»- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __- - - - - - - - - --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -" __ . ___ . _ _ _ _ _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 |!j® Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on t^^ thiS Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If ®PP^^5®”^ unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements 7ftnina aSthorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. imi •i ♦u. J \ ‘ a; - < ?» / • I ’/ : ^ I \ % 4.1i i1 2 i T- *' : .VI • ;V II IttK' 0 ^4 X li C^ f ¥ ■ "'^ r[»^- vU^*« .' ^ •ie.>-T« l-^sf) J t f4^-.- mt* 4>i' ’1 T 4 *• ^ « ■'. >S 3 •fi \ « • V'S i f*j 1 V VtS- M s| Helam mIs M f: SI u saI s V. *s5h “8-Sc ?liis III lA mni tl'lil S %t ®s spsr iivl*iM ly lA lil UJ 2 5asf523 CM S O ^ a ®s^ to lA CM I s ssss ^ ^ CLsss ^ ca^ VMT> I CO fo < fi H: o ^ M M O^ OC OC ^ y ^<0 »-« ui ui 2 Pi o H H -• ai me Ui o oo s §0 Ui O < K Q OZ03 a < UiCL UJ CL Co s 5 5“ §^ CL O I- #1 s « ac 0 fci Ik 1^ >y i **a * ii-i; i 4i-'32lss9i ssssi I 55 ^ lioS: CM ?s Q S Ir***« J. 5i|si ® M M 5 _ 2 S sssst sn s0 o ^ ^ og-o DC ^ o* 0 !i£^ a H X M X ^ Aj 55«|5 5---'^sSosS0 X Z Q 5; 5 0 B £ SS g “9 aS gi CL U Ui >- \ < Uia X < H- i.L C o/ s 8 8O •Jl s #- as - es-gj 8 O 55 II >• m CM I ^ g 0 o ^ >• ® ^d> SSSxi ® 33So0 ^ O o ;J ^ SSSSc BoB§ 0 Pss^B < ya o £g? c 1 . S8S ^ mSc9^ Vi^ f -1'^ 4. >• ■• m i > V •sm' i-.c L I* C. G 1J J f # «• * y I /' 1 • 1 I»•' or / . . ! •‘f ((' it. % ■h », • ' i -Urt • • «f r -■ X I V' ^ • ) 1 North Centiral Trading Co.^XMT> 11005 Viking Drlw*. Suit* 410 Eden Prairie. MInneeote 55344 Phone (612)0444602 #1 April 12, 1988 We ire signing that we saw Wendy Weihe's house plans and agreed that she could build It as It Is and that it would be a beneficial wind b'^ock for our house. Wendy Weihe's house win not hinder oir view and she will protect our land from any damage from thi construction. We live next door to Wendy Weihe at 1384 Bildur Park Road, Orono, MN. Signed:0 Don Keesling i- u . f leesling • ; e * ’ 1 A tV' 4 • V, ■ V- 'Ati : ■ -r mmm :1 4^ • i( d d * wv i? % v:' 4 k« "-1 i: \ jf'- A I • i , \ J I ? X >■- I . t « • V t I *■» i t '■ »■» ■* ♦ < • !/ » •» #'±^ I ^ f'■ w HOMS f*■annnw oroiWMiCB •> iB 1975, th« teOBO City CooBcll BdoptBd «B ordlBABC* llaitlay th« p*rc«atB9« of lot arM that cbb hm covarad with iaparviova anrfacaa ("hardcoTar*) Boch aa toofa, drivaaaya, aidawalks, ate. oa propartiaa locatad withla 1,000 faat of a laka. Stadiaa hava ahowB that aadiaoBta, oils, aad dabrla carriad lato th4 laka from highly urbaBlaad araaa hava a datrlaaatal iapaet on tha quality of watar i» tha laka. Tha iatOBt of proBo*a ordiaaBoa ia to oBaara that raiafall raa-off will ba claaoaad by filtariag'throogh graaaad or wagatatad yard araaa bafora aatariag tha laka. B.lYM ggTBACK «0BBB » WBCIWTACB AHOWBP I. 0-75*« 1b tha (0%). withiB 75* of tha lakaahora. Bo Bardeowar ia allowad II. 75-2S0*t iB tha portioB of tha lot looatad batwaaa 75* aad 250* frmi tha laka, SI portion of tha lot aay ba hardeovarad. XXI. 250-500*1 iB tha portioa of tha lot locatad batwaaB 250* aad 500* faat froai tha laka SI portion of tha lot nay ba hardcovarad. XV. *.00-l«000*f ia tha portioa of tha lot locatad batwacB 500* aod 1,000* faat froa tha laka SI portioa of tha lot aay ba hardcovarad. MOTBt Yhaaa ragvlatioBa apply avaB if you hawa a lot that doaa not abut tha laka but ia withit. a lakaahora. soniag diatrict. C. BOW TO PBTBBMXBl LOT hi WX7BIW BACH BBTBhCK lOWB (fo ba uiad ae daBoraBator in all hardcovar parcantaga calculatioaal X. 0-75* Iona hraa ■ 75* x /Avaraga width of lot in 0-75* lonaN \ aaaaura parallal to ahoralina / 75* *_ _ ft. • - a.f. (1) (Awx width) Araa of 0-75* sona XX. 75-250* «ona Araa - (175*or awg lot dapth in aor«) x/Avg width of lot in 75-250* aonaN \ aaaaura parallal to ahoralina / 175* X ft. • J.f. (2) (Avg width) Araa of 75-250* sona XXX. 250-500* Sena Araa • (250* or avg lot dapth in sona) x^Avg width of lot in 250—500* zona aaaaura parallal to ahoralina •) 250* X ft. -a.f. (3) (Avg width)Araa of 250-500* sona IV. 500-1.000* Sona Araa * (500* or avg lot depth in zone) x/Avg width of lot in 500-1000* sone\ \ measure parallel to shoreline / 500* X ft. -S.f. (4) (Avg width)Area of 500-1,000' zone J % 4 H .V y ■¥> D. HAWBCCXiakashoraSetbackIona 0-75* 75-250* 250-500* 500-1000* BAAOCOVBR cc' E. OTHB SB< PAMILT ; •Ul-lC-1 lal shi bui shi wii Hi CO ha wi a 19 % B . 4 / ' ' -^ ■n v^.-- >r-f- # ^V ■' i Li $■' * iiI« ir t 1 \’ • V z' ) 'I / •> ..............o. cMxnmTiwi towNmA. B.JC.D.B.r.Lakeshore Setback ton# Let Area In too# Bxisting Bardeevor In tm# BxistingBardeovarP#rc#ntag# (B/A)xl00 Pinal Propo##d Bardeovar In Sena BardeovarPareentaga CD/A)xl00 AllowadBardeovar Parcantaga 0-75* •f 3/, %??Pf'a,0 < 75-250* 250-500* w sf ^o-"i % % //77«e Sf .4-« % as so _ ■s m0 •f %sf %as 500-1000* iABDOOVBB S* LIM11ATI0II8 _ ^ rBBDOOVBB XNCLODBSt * structur## with roof# % tl4c«mlk« OrlwMys ot graVAl) D«eor«tiT« lABdACAplng AtAA* ttadcrlAin by pUstle sAMtlnB Any othor oorfsco thst doss not si low dirsct sboorption nf rslnfsll into tho fsoond ROh^ E. tyrm LAKBAnOM MCOLATIOIIB »«.ia«rtUi outriet «i» «ou»»i«» t.*»utloii. (lou «»iy snM 1 t*k«*hor* s«t aaek l<«4ttlatioi«. Tha aat back fto« tlia aborallM buildings on sdjscsnt and nearby lots. subd 2a lakeshore Hard Cover Regulations, within 75 feet of ^*7 .h.ii h*’no excavating* filling, hard cover, temporary or P*'**"*“J * ijfhin 75 to 250 feV of the shoreline there ska IT be no greater than 25% ®®7/d Within 25rtfwJ JU o^ the shoreline there ..nil be no greater cover. Within 500 to 1,000 feet of the shoreline tl.ore shall be no grea e hard cover. subd. 3. Ttaa Reaoval Kasulatlons. Ho = .ccr •.iithin 75 f.at with the diameter of six (6) Inches or more she. 1.1 i'w? auimoved without fir A pernlti from the Council# • .MMMi k% ■A I* ' . y 4- •41i#i ♦V i 4 $ \ - ^ 4 ■ 4 J .# » - : ft h * K*. X CA| x' i § •-<1s u F'3 X XI §i Oa X < X oo•«•fM IM lu %4 %«• fM IM m 9%•9%4• fn u ii > Oo m m K Id P4 ii #ea M »a tfC f- O < 0 V. 5 -#4 91 :u 4» 2 »4 i» SU ii & O' C 4^ « K U - 99 mc A 9 1 1 t i \r\ VM e 4R iidth•s «M ft « 100 -2 M K N M PI 0 44 U XS1 9 IM • IM 1 s • • • •4 M • <• .• § •i-g c OK pHoco •p4 44 s 44 M o -if vj > £ 11 31 UJ £J >« 6 s 15 > i4 « 2 «o r I O » 2 S^ n I O 44 I k« O oo l« O' 6 •H 44 •H K p4 # O 10 i4 I Iim o §o•o Ii M ii G •H N o •*4 i4 ♦ 5 ^ »4 44 O O Oo Ioom s IM Id • • %4 tM • • %4 9 9 %4 9 9 %» 9 9 iM m 9 %« ill 9 %9 9 m 9 • 04 iM • • • • • ^ IM %i • • • IM • • IM ^• •m m m Io 40 Ci « 0 It• vs p iC \ 1 i ■i 1 i e ■1 1 1 • 0 in CM 1m 1^ x: 44 •O •H 9 o u Oco u*o 4Cuo A 4i Cl (0 4Jm •H £ 44 O'co M a: oi 9 Ote oO'mu iiO >9so > •H Uo •o a> “2. <£ o •H M 44 U 8. «uo *8og3 13 o C «H ^ 44 O'o in c #H O M ^ 44 . o a g «> <o _ o C 9 « « ii f> 8 r-| • o I s pH M OI M O 2 a d - If oc iM • • IM IM OA H n o XI o •o o 0 4 3 ««uJ <c ^3> Or • \ ■ i \ • » .V> t ' •• f 1 ■i. }■ ^ J I ' 1 ; t ♦ • f ! .. 1 < • t - .1 * I r * o /"-V IMM3mMMr (ft M s10rt <• Ml Ml t* H* 9 (I H* 9 N Ms I VA a Ml •nJ vj III Ml M Oo Oo V Ml a o O'm & €1 m0»< 9 M 9 3 ; »1 • oft M Ma • 9# 9 •o O fWc CAMa3 oM<VM ss oM* n9A•lM 2*^ 5M> 9 •o % 9 M jr s K 9<o fto M H M » MsObo1 S H Mk 9 Mn I a ft Ml r 1 vO • • Ml »% • • • • Ml t% • • m m • • 9% Ml • « • m •> • Ml Ml •> • Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml m m m • • • Ml Ml Ml • • • Ml VI ? 1 sm oH* vJ 1 vA S o' ♦ 9z t i Mo 7s: 3 •« M* 3 3n I •dMo I- ¥ > 3 ir^t I?I M* M ft 9 90 3 3 I < S. 6^ IV XH*a ft t M I I > tr* ft O I 3 3 > I Mf H* 9 Ok V IV)»(r \/^ 0^^ I «kJ 9 Ml 9 Ml L*. « Hi 9 M 1 •i 9 •<—■ n Si • n ■>0 v/^ • • fO 9 • Ml fto 3 ft 2 M 3 Ma 3 3 I I 0 -f 9 Ml Ml Ml 9 Ml Oo Ml ■\tr<* ■• ♦ Vi H----- t* r *w » • .• • •.“•/' ■ .■^; ■V "■■■' :'KC !:V-r^l -I ■•»/•;. /» » . &WSTAFF CAU~. *>F^i(y<-nn /-r C__ J^ecic- y^C^&eC:^ %Vci^ t/jAt^L f)>e»UevA4A^ I# C ><^Ci IMAr-t-k \\*>tJ^ ) FuiXUi. |>jpn8^ ^y, &>«/<»• V x^/8.^'(».r<»i.s^ 2 <>'9 SOx^.s^ 9>^S li.tfOii /O >c '■f/i 2-C yri/; ?« /«/: H >‘1 I >^Z1 / -^5:^ / //Z3 /d^2- a:Q. "to sP. ^A. sA. a. .A S') ^S-Z sA ^- a i A ■2'> s.-(. S.A. <:-•/ /o 20 0 ^yy3V^(3'”^Vi) ^ ^ ><2^ ^ •2-fe.'2->'Z'V i /JC» Z(a * ^ Itw#‘' r t • * • i • v' I A \ h- ■, >• i •'v^ V#', »»w»qi*» • t<> »W « i.»HMH»" !*•? '*"■0^ r 1 iL^r«=*^Gro 6XV. F-^i 4; B» . c • • V *T^' f, / - it 4,«f2. si- i.® »i- l\}o v5- ^yrafK rtuUC t> r F Rr I K L K £? P 1-)TM- ■y- S. ._.U. oo^r Ai - ^2^ 3.V. S 3 /?(. j 4 o-‘>F' s - )«^2^ s$. O^C&Ai^ ^tnft4/.orwV^U- C i * 4- . •*• MUb ' ^ -x .V » % I S » t • nttf»! <MM r? I >■.- ■, f/MO exH. \ 4 . - % % ■> w^. %' » mm. f-' .V ^ ^ r ;a *Mi0^ * UH2^ 22^ V&B s A. r#*. - 4 (X> 5<c/;/ew*y • « - *l » ! I / h I ‘ / (S l r • ri .. ^ rr » *•% ®> /6 xr/C. 2rt. ^ ><2-2-» n(o yx8 * S2, %'i //x/y - /W 2,<?vy ^ //c- //X// 8x/0 - %>o 6»X/(^ ^ I n OAi *• 0-7^ i -7ir-2,3ro ys mu !^|t( VC>• At^^(i>) IZOJ 3V'S prtit-c .* V » ^ "72. -2^ 3C 7X'2> 3 X X I •:^ /(» -C.9 ' 60 {^7 2:7 5C.> 1 i-O i #.CJ.>re fO C>» Z"S'2^*^^^23.->ie5 y^.o^✓ Vl>1r6,i>y.4?i) ^.v) : b i<;t>t> _l!» K - IL A r>.'4 'I jtoa.|»». w vc')/23y^.c.'/) ?vz(»v.«y^ nvy^.o) t '- . -<r ( V, ‘ 4t><tT7A* U 0-1S \o, y •/. Ir'ist* W.oX 36.6 /• yt .fc /< ~o.H>y. -4.V*/. 4 i V'? V- rr»H< C-7“lueAt_ .#M6cO\/e<. C#ti>6^ vftgnt* <» f>coroa%& .... £)''7S';«, /3/3 xf. . 7X'iro 0--)s' S. O xt mm ‘ '■ -jiv '^. /1S"(P S.^. 1^ # 43 ••7 k:■ 2 k-* l-X' /.? r^c' - I ^ * V ( • ? # <»-• W*.«»I4« A %^« . • W o. W%»t,*u,,WENDY L. WEIHEIN LOTS 20 and 21, BLOCK I, "BALDUR t>ARK" HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA W. ' .. iifii iSK' '• > ______________^_____ Aeta Pr.0»%*J 7L^!0,%—t sg. 4i.3.^0C i/.5« Jf€f0is^n \\ 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey Bsginninq on the meander line at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 21; thence Northwesterly on said line a distance of 50 feet to the “ <-~..n. .„„ Wr>.-thMnct_ J r. . ■ ^ • ) !■ i i ' ( •« f-M. .. y.i M \ t i M I •* *» 9 1‘ / V./^ >■ ■' ^ 4 •I « / ij . : 1 i A # •»> •I ’ \ A ■ j f-CtKriFICATE OF SURVEY FOR WENDY L. WEIHEH^N’cou°nT MitmKoy:5>Knn£iTP ee. )?FAAw «*VIJeD:€XM •S»£2 v-'-’ PI - thPnrp^^wnJt’LU!?"??!^ Northeaster]y corner of said .. . 4. 4.^ I nr . 'li. ‘ ] • . > ' • J n j' 1 ■ f r4. / ■ -'',,i' • t >4 • '•! A * »’ -**> V' ' ■■ *. 1 • » f . *■ f !• i HmNEPiw'cW|i°?f H iNNK oT ^ /qf—< <|. /5( V i i' ay»g —»-4 /srottgA^ , >*" !-ot 21; then?e°NnmwPstp??v Mof said W" ■-:■■* i -pv »^. ^ ■ •• . /, ' —* r. il: - i * * J(T** *l V- .#» ■?■• f • .< ^ •' I •JM ^ 1 «i >fkfO bs «* «AC, atP; u 4.•• 4 *.■«*'*I , \f ^ ^''I U ^ ^ ^ >V ^ V* \? Vf< ^;5 2^rij.4 Jf^ -« ! ; ■ I I l?|l|Mi |£? I I I / n 5 \«■ i O - 0*C\ i^‘ • ml j^ ®jN r;.! i i ^f J ' I . §I8 ela 9 P p 0^1 ^5'*-hi g:^ •^riim nnL>ri^o ^ I 'I <\ ,' ^ I ^ ^1 ' A ! I« |£ P o O!^ 0 ‘ ^^ IS ^ o o ® 0 ft p* ®k- 3* ^ 5 O Q 51- — n £2 - rj ' -T o Lc- ^ i = £ Si£ « ~ CIS £ 5* r - Sm i ; S - N j 0 <Pi rl «■ ^§. § rt «v» > J - 3 1 £* <«*i ti r- jf ‘-^ . . ! S 0 ^J8 e r4 f: v%»r i «£*« IB?.- .■*'>diii •- 4-V ■ '.'»•' V\ ■ ■ ••v, X- '■■■ -• * •• - '"1r-i r .J'- •V- f. ^ .rit’ ■ > ^ • A •' ’.V. ft- r.^ i 4> \ t; f ^ ■ «»tnroBt city Adalnlstrater B«nihardsoa Jmmnnm A. Nabusth, Building « Zoning Juno 15, 19tt linistrator “’*^u“J22rllir* Soalaf Oiatrlet - U-lB MqulrM - 43,5(0 ».t. or 1 sera •*“ ** •AJact Mepactr - 1(,(00 t.f. ar .js Lnkoshoro sotbaek ynrinneo for grndo loyolSubdivision 1 Baguirod - 75* Propoood ■ €4* VnrUnco - 11* or 14a6% 0^^‘aatb'aek a^^-V.Voo a f varlancaa raqulrad aa follovat Bxinting - 0 «afa •ou&on*t coraor of^houno/’^** (hnrdcovor fron grndo lovol docking nt Aiil^Sd !*?*!SS •*'!* " ••5®® oroo of 75-250*Votbnck V/onVn Vhroo*BrniTi** 2«a5% (boood on osouBOd SoJ^S?unhi*J2ck‘linXcnpi^ crontod with drivowny apron, plastic Broposod - 5,711 Safa 59.3« ^ ®®"^*foction of tw^ts^roV"* high SorBlt roquirod for to bo locatod 2* froB side property linV.^^ Zdst of Bihibito Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit 6 Exhibit R Exhibit I Exhibit J Application Property Owners List Plat Map Hardcover Work Sheet Applicant's AddenduB I»pro»aiientaSlavatlona - Hetainlng Nalla and Grada Laval Daeklng % * V { . « r'li 2v’»k I « .tr r V *• • ft •. ■ ) ‘ 4- t f , n ;/ of Applieotlon*» propertytht •thV.VT^rvToSS aV.'.'bVMVA iss-rx •j?.’'±sr p.m'siiu”; «y~ •. “1.V/. ?TA'.iV t'hii":js iiQ)Oi^tant tho UM of tho ooron *^****^ this ••ction of roadway mnJt iaproy«MRts slncR th« bulldlna timrm?* this propArty, thbrs have baan no inaaad som il,aa of aa* ara aroaioa I?lL fJ! •PP»®»*<I in 1»«3. Wtaw a?2 l.roblaai’alSh'ti: ISIS' la%"fiSTiJ" of a5?"SalSS '^Ith tha bolldlno oarol^*^ wL/*V * of tha final aradaa lli» i^TSuhVJ* ^ *i” laT\f*®*xina. In addition^ a stalrcaaa la ^*** alda pronartv iJf ‘ siTirsoSi-a xo%‘ aSilWt'h a*’.;tTS^S®Jo;\"".Ur*,;~*J •i-*'Mi'..*SrVa?id S'tlbly^b:Sft*« .li's, "ortba'sssv^tHj^r hardcovar will ba raoovad portion of theadjacant to tha grada laval doors rK**^^* oppllcant aaaka dacklno araaa 5«ari/vi? :4VA.‘’.*Vna as: ba\*’cV.;;o’ti„*,: :sSo^cVa-f-i-r?F‘S^ .imnV'.V..’'’* »••• th*a SlStlVV/a'a'aML V; Isauaa for conaldaration: Sth^atM metbSTor UeTuilmSf'*^”"' *"• i"«*»e«P«With ataap banka and alao pravant: drs^tJl- controllng tha aroalon required setback from the lot line. ®ide appeara to not aiaet tha 10^ *■ .• • I- ■ I ‘■V- ■ \ * « . ) 13 j {m *1 •: ■ I ! «. < • «iu5j1 “uMS "•®’‘* ‘*ith<H.t•uggMts th« followiAgt ^ Appllcaat's addanduB«. foisting grada la<ral dobra. housa plaaa.^ ^ ' PAtloa, walkwayaa ate. with tha original 5. 2S0 Considar so«a of tha followings with •xirj'/rti- ••Mci.ixy t .aiu.S''^7 •»“ €»D.ld.rM lMrdoe..r uid .hMld b. *• :;p~r^7;s:U"r? — -ct •‘ Sr^J!cS5fe£I^?%r75' MtuikVllolSd ** ■*“• with i*9Sl^to*rtdSi!**tU£”«?i*?'^ff?^** l«fc»«her. ud aid. yarda ^nM.. ,11 1.*.* «*7V ./.V"’ *"' P'oPOMa .law.tlo» 2 a.tback'ar.«*.t*»”oo*a*f'^****^**^* l»rdco*.r allowMo. for th. 75- Allow.d - a,375 a.f. or 2S« SjtpjL”" ‘ *'”* '•*• •«- «>*»«« .ddltlc^l «..„» for Bxiating - 37.6% Houaa - 1,950 a.f. Driva - 970 a.f. Backup apron ■ 350 a.f. Entranca to houaa ■ 80 a.f, “ “••» «« ••'• O' .Kiatln, h.rdcoy,r to b. likMhSM iSSrSviUBt^JlMf"*^ hhrdcov.r propoa.d by .pplloant with Staff BarnwMudaticii at 4460%orth'shi^r?ri?S^D^^ ^or tha proparty locatad tha application by raduciira all hardeovir*»i«>h4^ •Mitlonal tine to anand to %, there ahVll be no o7 •«*••a graSing plan if applicant aatback area and provide lakeahore yarda of 7he proparty Su^^^^.l.vatlon. within th. 75' a.tbnek •**o* "o changaa In fro. n.l9hborlng property i ***t * ** <>»*lnag. to b. dlr.ct.d away , -a ^;l i. "U. •* S ^i:>^ ■■ J 5'. . %r h- k- 'P'if . i f, / » 0 J ■ vi'i ■ ■ .% ■ ' *'i c ' ■ ' -'^4 . . •4 -' < "V m *‘l > ;:.i I ^ . , CITf OP OROMO - miAllCS APPLICRTIOII nonoffif iMAnoM AiM-Tfl Property Idmtlfication Vvmibmr (P.x.o.) 1350200000 Plws. chmck on. . P,op*rty _X abstract or - ------ -------------- torrana? “ “• i* »ot i„cl«d« on 01 CEH 150.00 C,W Ti 150:00 * HECElPT-rHm YOU ^036320 coot ROl 715:23 05/19/53^^' APPLZCABT “ Wnmn (heiM) Wwno (>»orfc) jyj jn^n -----::;::::::5iSr^?8aiL-^afi_^city. _—.«S5nn;r-“s;^nSr==----=^^^-- Nana______________ ________________ ~ Phona (work) Addrasst '"' tlTit Data Proparty Acquirad - - - - - - - - - - - -- <»onth/yaar) *»»« .ai.cnt P.rc.1. i.„a. ®W 08B OP PlOPUtPy Prasant Zoning District /L1^ ^ | g P^®®*nt Usa of Proparty , —■■' Rasidantial _____7^;_______,, Othar (spacify) y »w»xmo. or MBoSi’ iiw-tnd I>««crlb. in dotnll.^g^ VARIAMCBS Mpnrnwn - lK>t Area I^t Width Setback Variances ( A~ rrwit Other Pront *vc<-^0 Hardcover _ _ _ Rear) % ' m , .* , ^ jk ■'r 1* / V- / ■ j !BIP r..ultl„, r,o« .trictDBSCRIPTIOM®®*cribe unusualCode Requireaentay^^^^^ conditions preventing coagtiiance with ZoningRB1..r. ^5•^ I? 8. rznoSSiJIS Form S'KiSVJS 5S s;i; Topographic survey hardcover calculatien« •. 4n“-.T0££-s7!isjr --lu^ r, srsfi.. *» «n «M«imua to^ tM^ «»«n«r« u«t). The Applicant b ----------------------------------- Rteff. APFLZCABT's SlGAgmix ------*-------------------- ■ P*f— The applicant hereby aor«.. 4. ----——— unMMl fjfV" l*‘“ °"'*** **••• ^"o*Pay “i 1 i*"*"!***! or Appllc«,t.. Slwtur. Date®**>**RS siquwio ------^ - The owner hereby ackowi a t«„ .„a voriac2;iS„“S%'iir5^“»f^ "o?p^r^.a'orr„^\X'- Applicant must have all ^014*7™“ --------------------■ Sf_______ review "eetlig. APPUcaSts «S.t ‘»** *ea *Ver aVe^r“"^Snre.r o«-e 01 -«rpriV?riH^^““ -v^e V. ' • - , hit - m !. ••. i t * ^ yf I , ^ .‘•••irft,' ■. * -V-^’ t-.'' ■ t A i > 9 I N s si S*!>. 2S“'^g sN- ss»lil Es igssii> M 8 (•SSpis ? s «o s»-8c 3 > r r^«:i:lii iifl |!s s!l !ii|» 2 ;!i* *lii”»8 aos ig| P t 88 S^S*s iS T ■•|j • M itf ly osillii ^ P |2g? liii I *< 8^ ?S.s2» !?«•»hnl I* <^iri °S|T «i:h§ s*=- fi-:‘hiA§8*r 7*B"i»•I 8^8* ;i!fi! iSsI IIP 1 2 I I |lgi III • if ESEJ« •■■■ O'. 0 •S;. '■ =■ ■ . ■ .0 :-; •i- / 'f' I jE ' r* •* #i!r ■ >r'^ . >■ /; I / • !/ ■' V ■ I ;■? I • t ^i' A V ? ■: ■ "7, % 3M> ■m^y. m^myyyy.. <‘ .,■' \t V f V \ * r} t^ . i > I ’ \ * • >r ’'' ^ r M < C C % 5^ mm r »^^. ■* • , •■' .im . ■ ■ -i'. 5V o3>t*mMM CO •-4 Mlar»«o 9^r 9 e 7 S 4 ‘ 'U ‘.j»r t * * A' I- C/i (I S li < : "f i »•’ 5^i* n z ^ - •% •%• • n \l 'MSilt c jr « i t> g “I I " F sI !{“. H M < v»» \| N ^ ^ f. y% X X, 0 0 < HI Ni I w> 9 z mm »%HI 7» >r i- 7*r m i KUt o; I a HI M M S Vn 2^ ^ - J3- K» •. o•\ s»« a Ha 1 •■V i v<tt >0 3V® i SI LlN A _o'tw ^ m N ^ 9 z H* IT m K m 1 ! M1 •ar M M ■»m m m m m M m M m X \ M M H II » M • V \ < V width••• '•• ;, ••••i ■• 1 ••• .• ■ L'Os ' ^I 1 1 «v‘ Vn i 3^1>c h Ob U r • • mi 1 1 «» 1i 1 • • fi A -6 «A m 'i ff Han V#♦zojrH § I a Hn M •% s ■/:Hv*>/ . N 9Iff ^0 S S #t r I eP •I HI * • • •«!• HI \ r oo , \ u I- * H\ \ t • -:U « a i '' r- .• ■• •,‘v / r • ■ 1- • . V > i - ^ . ' • i . ' p'y t',’-^' ‘ jsrr■'•' > • *' ■ i : ■.<■ ■ .^ -■ 1 • ■; j ir * ,M• : ■ ■ . : •> i 1.' i ! 'r- %■n. . I V - rt 4'i ' ;' •' » I ' y< • 1s •a•Othtr __tL EXISTING}^S^C gg5 5 • • ^IT » •mrIT naH SHI I Mae I ^ p% m •%•%«•• • • ••% M Ms gr g I ^ 5 ♦ ♦ E I 11 i£ S *H) «v 2 ^1 jj S fo •f 9 \/ » m • !• M Ms y 1 M a s -IT* MM ^ W Hi M »• • ►% HI 4 ! ^ / r w. > * i ^ \" ■ » r;p.•. *t ' ! pi ».-..». 1 If -• - li if !l i! O 0S4imf>j-,o^ cr ^<se/&’,r~ tA«M/£7CX AC^uS-rT^ Tb UPSf^^H>s~ 9f^.ACTdc-Z/fT^ tJrTT/ 77/*- rfKe-jw- s rTv^ oF hh ^ FF^FFtt^ tTpm/_ U^SFFF, £tf(U^ u^i>0!0 */^^SH/F*) '^snrc<.>Kno^ dp Fo*.^ i zCocge. je^ ,^o i£)cr(SF.i&\i<L,^A tjftin^ ^TTFS" //cw>ie*. ^-tFTTf^F FfotsJOTt. W«- a,FF£>er /U oftV «* /J« ,7i,* V 0^FFoner:sryst^ £Kos/o^, TFs' cf >F^ P^^ri/ur' pGzJP.tAJo, Ti C jo^/O^cst 77/«- AOO^ U!\)t7y /ttAUAJ^ 77/trtOH/f-F' t^duiJF £^n/^ (ms», SPF^ r% fr^ r-o^zn^ Tf/S}fi^ CFCF FP.C^ij—, St^ /^<^jjr- ✓j yUoeJ ' A®^^7^>/W.275&tjJe)f.y7/ 7/fs~ D^cjc/AisC iJocic.£> Stf- oP^aJ jo/C f=&<c /flSJO^- 77o^ 4no(zr7-uF.-^^ a/cs^ I /t K <*.4 fi.cny'YTf^ &aoiv| ^SsloaI rr?iev tUo^Lt, W7o <5^/ /+ ^ «t5ifeiir . *» ^ ' ■*‘'V 4: *•• ^ • ■ ,'• f ^. ^ ■■•* .1 ■k' 1: tf ~ *t ,5 wf/i/p 'TTf^ f^t^o oJbMaj> Btf ^f>«pr>A//7?;' 'n/ytSB'ta.. T?/&.er /j- ^ AJ6t^ Zb.^/^e/i/3^ ZTisZ jS/e^£is^ ^aJL j 7U>0 ___Zfi^ t<J' TWs' Z^j 9^&/Z^«>^ ^5Co»» ^/*77e> 75L_ Z>S^A-. ^ OftStaf____ i^Sjfeo^iT^ Sti>€’ ^ C/fe-t&j iJotjUij) gtf- tf7/^£)e MJtTf^ oeDtHt^ psck~ S7SFT •Th /He^S^sJ) '77y«' C<c/7-/c/fC fbP- f^^T7f^yyt/yJ^ iKi y^Ja/t^Ty^ <SttC^ <sA S/9myKk<s-^ B^SZtJ^SPO T7i^ i ■i < it f J i: P -• — w- I! •:!u rf i; IaJ0VT i0*~ /aJ7^ Z9^/t.v /tjbOMf 7?^<e- J^PS)^ IS fe PlS0-f7^S^. Z^0T CcJ aJSKS 6SJfA/7~ .-. 7T> C^VeL !/i IZJ/ A. ZrtPuRSy A*JS> AfijWf 7b CevUTAoc />VfW/Wt€“ ZH^' Afia7««*77cj- / /ff/9*y>Jn9Ui*<JoS. A<jl - oJouc£> igtf' o^ __ f>f^&3uiL^ rrXM-»Z-(SJ> C'cTV^ ^7^0 L&^eur is^cucP ^«*7v»4»^49s(gS!? y' Ht^H- //l/Zb /V/LC f Pr-' /^Pb(H TTVe- Lb-r- £^aJG . 774<S' Pfi'CAJ^ ^COiJjc-ut-p Se 7?tf3P 725<*«7>y<St h//7W f^A^7-7Af^rs /^aJ p 3" Pe'pr^ op p.dcp ^ /f iTf/dpSQ^p^e- f=/9SPj<i. eJ fUcjt J^ccjai^ /?/A /<AiP W/’«K/«K. T"!® /^^ffACOc/^TTS" /Vt/ v^JP <5i<.57 “ e. P Tt<e- J c>/<.. T7/e~ £>cj/j^ts /f-C^C. /f lO-At~K/^<k P/f7V 77/^~~ •V ■' •tt V^ I • . > i J —' (aii: I •4- i! <r?^ /5,7Vop CJog)£> 'TN^^ s^srti£^ 111. ‘22^^JZri. ■"i \*k ' V-' t:y <r 4 • ,*■* ; t ♦ >i f > *f?«» >■ ’ 'Y' ?■i ■u. . y' ■-1 • :-1 • *?■!. ■a. - r ,W:.' »■ /ttoi-,./.' I lifiKS>sfHF S ClAict^um. >^or«;e^ 0*U/:>/72>aJls t 1^ A4k^ «77Xe-7>4)y»i< A//W Cx^^av~7Z V. :.‘l ii! ^fCLO^/^diS <///fftp -Cifei/^72, /aS O/y/c^ yj* ^f<7- c/f-/>ML/7v?^vf66Ajidi ^xr/y TSVfr- {I U- ji ii P/ttvaTA/}^ z^/^ep ^ i^t/«r -7^ < Pf cjc y/vce- r^c i^su^fistjs- s/z.^ o*t. -tf 7^ f*<!^JtSTF-*V7^ 7?/S- O^Ps"' ««"<7~ 3/fC4C. ^ If^ /fccotoep OAJy /o'our ^5 e-©>», 1 '??/«' P^c-tc. u>ouu.j> j Oajl S T^> c^fuer /f'cc^ej:r /9a^as1^ 7^^ •c. 7?s<^ i:(:! • f II I* I; •* II ■^fi" pe'c.K UtiUcJ> Cou€7». UAJ^V€Ai jMt> •Slopgp. pue- To PoJi'/T^e/J/v'y* op f?/e~ /f6».e- 7^/e^ /f-e-is^- Ajonjry op 'Wc~ <g/9/z/^^ •*J • I c OOMjCJ> P«B-*Vo t<JC V J^fJ-di^SS^Ci ,r V- • * k ^ i- '* ■1 ■ . «■ .V > . % ' I? -j ■ J E a 4*. - V/ ; ■ i» 1.-' * * 'f ■■) •ji.iir 77/s" CKJA/Gt^f*CA0lS <Tb Cx^i^pi^ Uf/T//* . yj“«“ .i: ! I Jte^Ji^b^n c„. 4'/e<so/-r«: ^ .7^^I/W’«.«'C.//W^ ^OAj^fJ^ CoJ^Si,^octcc* li i! --------------4*» 1 ^asiSLu^3^7D* / S/rns' ^/-T/^TTT, _(7^. ^ ^cocj i -------1 l! Ci-<i7“ 8a<,k. /aJ^//3-«- <7~x/er Ty^-aasa «rCKD»>i /W' ^/^^»<ST7<lt.«-, 7~o >9(rA Ori 77^C O ~ PS~ 77f^ 00^/\jS^S^ 'TJV''^^ /-• lAy^y > y>-». r — P^sf^mzcrr=^cLy P 'll J '* LANDSCAPE ill !il igOONgliwifW nymei«i.MII8844t 0OUO8.PAMO I ' V JWM ffHHNiir '• .i ^ ■'j*i -.1 S- i: V. V V ' • «4. : f ..'^•, m-' g.''- ■ '^h- ■ t"k ■i^,. J f J* ••I ■ * I • ■> l/ < T-A\ J- / r. fAUL RASTER «)4S(eoa’t)HXJwns or a riAioixiio connssion MccTiiie »*»♦ o rtaRUAtv i?, it7t • metH* r«vt«w*S ctM ncwijr tulbaitcecS InferiMtiefi, notlnt that tha new plan whotn a tell aroaieii plan.Jin Olaen atata^ cha plan provldad for a 10 ft. nlda tttllltp and drlvanay aaaananC. and suggaatad 15 ft. ba prevldad for battar aupport of eha bank along tha drivewey. Hr. Raitar atarad ha had no ebjaetlon to a vtdar aaaanant, but ialt tha antra uidth would naan ranovlng nora trees.Ceswiaalonar Frahn novad, Conmlssloner Namneral aacondadf a notion to recotasend approval of tha raquaat by Paul Raatar for prellnlnary approval for a aubdlvlslon aubjact to tha following eon- dltlona:1) paynent of a park dadlcatlon fee of $1,000 par lot; and2) tha dralnaga aaaanant be approved by the Citv biginaar; and3) paynent of ona additional water unit ef |SM: and A) paynant of 2 aawar wait ehargaa of $225 each 5) r*«ita ara laaoad; andtna driveway aaaanant ba widened to 15 ft. and apptvyad by tha City Engineer; and ») a title opinion ba addraaaad to tha Cltv and »\ Attorney; and[) only lot 2 have riporiar. righta; and I) aroaiM control plan and aanitary arwar •PFtoaad by tha City Engineer and City Attorney; and RWPtrty indicating Hation - Ayaa (6); Raya (0). The notion paaacd. •*Pl«l"dd there ware IS 2)\n^er 'Witad! 1) lot aroa;r** •*•**>• Tha lot new ia eecuoiad bv a thwi*75*fr flIL*eh"*i‘i"* dra^aaa bl «nd that part ef the hewaa wouldbe located where tha trailer la new located. laauanea of a building pamit ‘ * *" miL SEIIGUMO JjOtlR SHORE MXVt ri .Ct fPigM • li k ■' y ‘4 > I)»'/, •I V P-rN‘j.►’i ;:1 K-i^V.. v^-|;--. MtrM- ■ i.' vr |C.iAV>.1*.'i»0 ¥ n ■ M ''■ i U- j ‘>^‘f«• > .T v‘ ^ »• ^' f > W J •• !••. <:S'3a1•"H% ii •? -♦; fc- I i 4 I' .%} •». ■ ; ‘ « / 4 1 ‘>Jr •*1 (1 * • -^n ‘ •*^Ut *f S<«r«ayCfNMt/. NlMMlt<l|i »■ '4 — • . . ’«i\'‘’ ■* .-.I**-. •• rV^* ^ ; -V** ■ i ' ■-“. • T ■ • r, -.Jc «f .t„^ . >-.■*. •. ^rvVifcV.’i "73i A ' S • k • 'vS3 fcf i is!? *‘ •* **•••’ *• fc . - ■-:- -t.r-! -mi i^tel i« a 4U* tote • • I IPRM MnMP liMvwi** * * * <v • * *... M'V X\'^C'^''.-‘i i r*«mum mcniw arngAv»a flMai, :;<«ui. isr#t7* "•J l! •^kMk • It ft. *• «^->S?StLrt f *u, 'I J;<r-* ?>• It At %\r.^ •wS H 2u? ^*t Mt ►t nqiilnwitiitt, ix »a,*.*sr!;i~**‘» *•. u. ‘f - .*• *.» If • ^ • 4, 4 .•,V !«• laraM •( aM-acafafirttr < V •I •* 9«r«9M A • i f'd 22^nf?2; •«tMl ' t •ItAn S ..Si"ib?.;4!ai ». M—.* ,. .Ui. "■ '***“”f j t: • «. « f^***!? *^"i!JJJi?i'II!III*?4 ‘4a r-rmi i^:‘*^‘t-^isK.."^2::•2}^.i? £fe-r»• »•«*«; ortr^::,f«- •"«» it? M^sr f»«»tractloi‘S I25*S!2l?nl"T ‘-r.‘..rf.:'i.*:j:jj.-s..i-« aa».„J. »!i (OmiU iiimAI f J * .mm i- M 1 J J* ^• J•v;•?J•J^1 ii ‘U ♦ 1 V •V,»/ ^1 !•4’. ■ r il' ^r1 ’>|:v^0h •3'• .* f'f 4m 4 \ * SStSLry ptat'MijStW WMllUy - *r>:^ . '>' 'i^r>’ -l'^.>1 «f iiti«Mi ns iinUSJS3^<'■. ..*. .. ^Sis!^S^-!r=« _ 5*^r ^••cf. »«fft MiMtiM f §• MiittoMl It ft, CMty Bm« It %• HtuMpifi etmtVrn ' I5KSS! »r |rt« m? Mfc ># lf?i f«r CmmsU IlMtiaf - ntNH Ii« Itli ■« MMlvttoii iMlMtlat ^R^*Si5tu^ JlMMitawiaTSw?*^ "•S?S3K2rsrjra •5 ZZmi •I MvtatM «<La mm* (mmM ------ JSTSt i’tkB i«ftt rs « ■>4/ - -NP •> a* . V f. ■ •■ .' ■; • k-i^. 'Vf,. . . - • • *^». . . ■ 2,vr '.^ • : . .s : ’•• . . ■ • •" . * 94, p»Mh rnmomm^M tft ----------ttr‘s:.Jsrsa %rS:*S? »»»». i»», ifc»«r»sn5i^* •'**•’ w«i«t In n y|.|5*J* JJ* PJJ*^•o ~i.*««i».*T:'aiiS*22;'i» 2* ■Itt' t « •» « • « y, J i-p .Jl-: /■ ,-‘l <^•1 •‘I > .*.• 4 f C# I .*» V.% '•ci«r »]*m !^S **»mr r»v,il.. V,.' ; ^ ir^'- ..1 •u ^fl—iM___ • •! - j*'- t<»''Ta> .- ‘■- i V* !• ft* ' - i - ■ .V • ' '. • - V >♦* o,v...V ^ \ • at, im « « ’ 'V •h:'^ t • V . ^ , X. >« ft f V •> twite; »# tete fti • 1^1^ « V • f ' ■ : ■ ■ :-su' M '■.. .??'V S*'- imTS • y • ay I mm "tin » f 4 §• »:■! J f Iin-7.1 1 ^ j ; • V .. 5 ^uror cmoivo .1:.,■• J.4 • •' 2 V♦ ^U4n v: f-r- HDim ViMat ^ - A ■V V ~ r;:"" - •PfltMtion "*• ****^ •• JJJJ Ml RIQUUIO . MlMfe itaiwa t. th. •««, AmoVAL nUM. Mwmitw AmwML • --'•^^ssisr ast •••Hetlng'Jlll'ci^ a!ih' - ’i ^»vv* 5/* •• t ■C- »• A>,1 •« '^•* iv . .-"r-v A vu ^ V •■ r ‘ r * • ■>■ •; ; ^ .y f ' f ' y j : 't '-‘vWlie* * *i>V>tvt"'5v74* ’* -I 'S' w. s' t . i • r '» / 1 ^0 . CITYof OROXO*’•*’>*■ •*•« *•••* Bj». MuNm4u V>.t;*l«!ktuiMit|Ml l>MW-r*TrUHiiMf 4M r;r«:SMitrol Ms.Donald N. Carter 4440 North Shore Drive Hound, m S5364 MMtinit ONte Notice Date ^-10-S2ieo to VarianceCtondltion.'*! Vac PemftSiMlvtaion, l*rcl ieiinary Subdivision, rinalse os sessftftssst*is»e»sissss.>ess tL ACTicnf Vote: For Against Abstention . ,to_approve ^*our lot area and lot vidth variance eohicfp^ fniiowina litionst 11 nrorosed houae .m»l -jJBDlIQVCI libit D may not exceed allowed 2,525 sf of hardcover - City vill illov cidditional rdcover for_a_turnarou_nd ■section to proposed drlvetrav ipector s review) ? 2) City will not cfont setback or hardco\*er variances forfor any iNprovewents; 3) an^iccess permit from the iien«>eni«» gau,itv ii4..hw.,y It be submitted with the building plana? 4) removal of 2 sheds and/or aaraoc. tlabs and gravel drivovay prior to sheet reek inaoection and inmediat-.’. r^»»r.riH>7P if disturbed areas. 0&\!?LIJIE n^TT. 5-10-83 for siihffittal of new fnfomatlon (application nay be eonsiderod fomally vitbdravn if Information or explanation is not provided). ^ for Work Pormlt applieatfnn for work to begin for %icrk to be completed WORK PKK-flTS ARh f’r.Ql’IRK') - contact Putlding Inspector before be.-.innlm: vork. VARIANCE approval ts 1 Inur'd to the extent shown en approved plans. ’Airia.nco .nifhority 'expires one year .iftrr approvil. CONDlTlOJtAT. ISE APPROl'AI. expires upon chance of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified ab«>ve. PRELIMIXAKA* St^DIVISIOK AprRi'V.M. - Applicant must provide .ill Inrnrr-.U lor* and or lmprove*-»*n^s required fnr fin.al approval. Contact Rnninp Administrator. FlNtM. M7U»TVTSlo%* APPROVAL - Applicant must have dr.swlncs, rr^nlut Inn nod .nl’ ’'ther required rfcMMinenf n re«?nrded, vlth cert t fient len nf sM*»h rerordiiip. retiirnet il Tit'’ 'aiuncll ?!Jnut*'s r..iv t»i’ ! J nt*d • •••' .!•'f* •• ‘li.. . M! «v ,f tciv: tbre»‘ . tri«......• ••♦ im* £ J \ • > I •. \ 4 A .jff X / ■■-/■ t ; s • • ■i r-# *r • ‘ff \ ♦ * . •• 1 •' * * . ,r‘v*'".•■IV''^ V-'-i’T.: ^ ■-■ " t = ’’ Y '’ - '•. - ■t.'. < ,0‘ ‘ ». S K ff. •; i J ;. ^ ••■•»* ..A . ,y,^^ .H • \ k ‘■. ' »•:« «>r'4;I I .»i» -•#•.-.■ 4'-3'4. : ■' s4. i;r|‘'i>.:. ‘ / < t|- J* ^ 1^ |W • i-. ’-:•i i'i I,. ^ kir i: ■..' ■'. -iW-.'* t tf ^ • 1 . ■ / •• *■ •« 4 • ! ..>.4> ■J V ■/ >’ ■' • 'V ^ 'iv.' ■'i * ’ . ' ••.'*'•• • • . .' ' *- V 11' ^ ' •' ’ fr* .« V Vt ^ '. i' f • ■ -'• T- yn •.. • V I, -i - - t ■■• I ■* \. ■ i ■ *■' . V’ ' ^ ■ I -■* t * -i* ■•• ,•. ‘ I' • . ‘I 4t t il .,!■: iK ';!- ' ■•■': ! i’/ "5 -.-' ■ U* '. 1 ,. Jt " J:. V i {fir . ••' ;*t %.». J ‘ ♦ iV'' ^ !:• ** ‘ I *. • - • < t •j >• . I .■• ■,' X VITO v' V ‘ r u| JL jy ^ \i M» VI 0 ti V “J: .* % * ;;'t’ i If a 9 < VN I $ A t t-?. ■ * ’ '-f- '. f i. ‘ i i -'/js ;4« *■■■ •?•■• . >:’ •. ; ;‘.v.. • . :..>... ■•^: V.- .. ;• . r J” .••/ .z, • ♦♦ ’*■ ' • ’,■'•'•••' ‘ ■• ••* '■ 1—, .. ( .,- T. iT?;f •; - .V' ^ • i I* *,. • fo ^ •. • * . . y ■ • * ' • . V- ..i!.r^ ^7 ‘V: •• / ’i * •—. •C t:Mr '.'•■ ■<:■% "7 ^ "•■■pr: • a ■ ••...'• ■• ■••■: • • • • •' ■•*■■.= . •■••• ; -t'. • '7-1- ■*■••, ■■•rr •. • •' > ■•> ^ ■*^V\ , • . : H . ’ * . • ’ . *• “ ^ S 'fyrr'’^ vl'iV’‘n^v - >► .. r / , •/»: ** .* , * 4 **■ > i * . » - ' t - , - •*"*»» 4,* ♦ *' ' . • - * . \ , ,^ ... .- •• • • ■ • • • ■•■ . > / -■« • . « »*• f / » I- <<« I s 4 . \ y ^ * j I ‘ ' f rX ^^4 • ^ ' -^ > ■' - \> ... -m M. : V* V ' »» f r I ■T •J t ^9 punning CoMltsion ChninMui Knllny FUnning-CoMission liMibnrn City Mninittrntor Bnrnlinrdson Jennnn Italwsth, Building s Boning JU Juno 15, 19BS linistrntor •1291 Alfred Xrornon, 2935 Casco Point Bond - Variancs - Public Soaring Soniny OUtriet - LR-lc ik*«B - 3€,491 s.f. or .83 acres ^Bquired 21,780 s.f. or .50 acres Vertinont ■eerttens of the Oodo - *^?^*j* “ *^**^®***®>^* Hardcover legu let ions - Apol leant • •‘•Jf^cover variance for an increase of 321 s.f. or 1.18 Uerease in hardcover within the 75-250* setback ana. ■ardoover Pacts - 7,214.5 ■xisting - 0 Proposed • 0 75-250* Mback area - 28,319.5 s.f. Allowed - 7,079.7 s.f. or 258 **^*8ing ■ 10,884.1 s.f. or 38.48 Proposed - 11,185.5 s.f. or 39.58 Baroover increase ■ 321 s.f. or 1.18 250-500* Setback area ■ 894.1 s.f. Allowed - 268 s.f. or 308 Bxisting - 202.7 s.f. or 22.68 Proposed - 194.6 s.f. or 21.88 Hardcover decrease - 8.1 s.f. or .88 1-ist of Udabits - A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners list D - Hardcover Fact Sheet B - Hardcover Facts 75-250* Setback Area P - Hardcover Facts 250-500* Setback Area 6 - Survey H - Staff Sketch - Proposed Inprovements I - Elevations J - First Floor Plan-Addition E - Second Floor Plan-Addition ■■■ •' ^ \ 4 r* V-'-' ; ■4. ■ f ..• i*v .■>1 '*i. M i A _' ^ •,, > *■ V f, r‘ / • ^ rJ Zoning Pil« #1291 June 15, 19S8 Pege 2 of 3 “ W»« applicant proposes s two-story !**• «*iating structure.^rch, welkwsy and portions of the bituminous drive will be replaced with a two-story addition and a single level two-car garage. The first floor addition will consist of a family room mud room, and laundry room. The second7lSor addition consi^^ suite with a deck area extending over the SDeAM^i?J*^A deck. Review Bxhibit I, ^etld^iekl 2l* ^**“**^ elevation that depicts a system ofP*^®P®»*d aite plan shows no other extension of J*** l^a»»ard side. The fleer plans show the second ^ aatanding out from the master bedroom suite 4 feet (total deck 4'x 20*). Any other profwsed ^*^*J^^* must be shown on the survey and would beconsidered as additional hardcover. ^ wouio oe drainraa'liL^£t.4^H A* Pl*ced at the break in the Revi!IS*x«hifc?«. 5* ?? the north towards the tennis court. M 7* IVPlicmnVn improvements would result in hardcover within the 75-250* JJJJ* *!!?.• decrease of 8.1 s.f. or .8% in the 250-500* It M 41 a^ttld be able to maintain hardcovertrimming back on the proposed bitumious surfacina and 2?IvVt%n*T?^^^^^ T® two front Sot areas - reviSJ Se frlS? limV? ■«hibit I. in reviewing the staff sketch, Bxhibit H, drivlwit • ^«^i^»ttAtion of hardcover from the finished bituminous driveway all along the front of the new addition. Ilirnffw addition does not encroach the average lakeshore Itorv deVk"*ffi^«**?*®*^/ ®5 properties. The secondlillSrId Ik V.i oVi •^tmnd beyond the front floor level deck oroo^^ y IS *4. ®" the given elevations in theliyout there appears to be no extensive plans to IdSiliil IVi ®' An * A11 to the site. The proposed satisfvino khA from the existing tennis court ®^ AO* for structures. The Poiia RMd.*^ ^ change in the existing curb cut at Casco dtaff Becommeadatlon - To recommend variance application of Alfred and residence located at 2835 Casco Point findings! 1. The additional hardcover improvements are predominantly property that drains away from street yard. approval of the hardcover Rosemary Iverson for the Road based on the following created by the proposed located in the area of the the lake and runs to the ‘ncrcch th. .v.t.,. I • U''i ..f f, / •• * 4 a * . '/ t Xening Fil« #1291 Jon# IS, 19M Pmgm 3 of 3 « •«J«o*»t lands availabla to «i. .P,ro..l Oil! b. ..b^ to tb. foU«.ln, condition.. lWtod*S*J».4Vor*^j^*. ^*"**°' oball bo tk."7oSij ii^ntr* i* lak«shor« 6mek KMsarino at Vx 2o? lakaahora froa tha «aat?r SJrii .«4^-n^^aiatlag grada laval dack. •*>ita and plaoad ovar tha ,:... -f, i i r< PI >1tel' V- *'i.5 ■ /* 'U ' .‘■1 •A ^ <• = '. ■. •'■ fe-ii' ' ‘’ V ,1'r.• •■■:•' ■ ■■M 1 €>' V ^ ' IT* - r "J i'- t; IW- /] • k i- • /*• ^ ■ ' ♦\ > /, 4 . A I «#H ICI^. or cmxmo - vmiakb applzcatzoh ^^Aft2?-th2?F!ri'S" application)Wl^cation fee)**o®»*i locMxoa Site Address f..r:'y,H .1 /(•C * •■:N «i?- /f ; • frop.rty Ktantmeatloi. Nu>b«^ O.l.p. )2lC>l 11-^^ ^i nr><=^^ ^iaase check one • Property abstract ‘o •PPliction i£required survey. AFPUCASr N Addressi - torrens? not included on Phon. (hoiw>5g>V7o4^^ ®"“* appUcuit) ^mMrn wr- IH_ •mt «h.ii - n Phon. (he—U7l-Q1OTm'^aiM — W«o«« (>orlcl470-fltaiC” Clty.iJh'I^A-ni Naas Address t Date Property Acquired YOU Tt5:C\ T ^^ , ---------- (■ontVyear) ----------™2.fili;S3>alao «m the adjacent parcels of land. P**8«W 08B or Momw ------------———------ 05.'! 7/8i Present Zonlnq District Present Use of Property i Residential DRscRimoa or ■utobt Describe request in details Other (specify) ^T!^^*** Const^ction Cost $^0Qi I ^ ^m VAR1AKB8 K Dot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front V Hardcover _____ Rear) J J K' ■ •I 1-. '■’ I-.t '• i^, / ^4^ ■$ V <,‘1 r '■ . • «“ i *1 i • •4 • II ) * .Describa undue hardship or practical difficulty resultlnu from atVict DBSCRIPTIOII or OHOSOIO. POOTBIITr OOHDinOMS Describe unusual property conditions preventing cosipliance with Zoning ) Code Requirements t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ | fj BBQI 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtein this list from Hennepin County Departaient of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped* legal sised envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and pressed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property otmers list). As an addendum to this aiq>lication* please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. ' The Applicant and Property Owner sip,at sign, this application. Please remember that your variance application, is liOt complete if the above information has not been included. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Certification by Zoning Oeimrtment thait Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date _ _ _ _ _ _ ’.Vl'L.J«• APPLZCAMT'S 8ZGI The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator* agrees to pay all fees and/or yAjiMiif unusual expenses incurred in review of this application* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to tlie best of his/her knowledge. ^ c ^ n IApplicant's Signature MlC Date VONHIRS SIGHATOU The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorises reasonable entry.. onto, .the.property by City staff* consultants* agents* Commission memters* and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification bf this request. Owner's Signature (iiZ3 L-V (l^Uu Date • t Applicant must have all suksnittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant ia unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building ft Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. "'irE J 1':. M // f' P«rah..^W^ ki "& i*> J ^ c:v"- 'i'-v r I •» # J t •l . / ' ) ^f' vi ' ■ t f ■J ?\ ^ \, # ' » V •« ■ - « ■ ;s ¥ > ■ A •It ‘i«• tf ■r^ . * • t * •" r- “>>>^' ^ jT* % t f y '* “ ‘ '1 1 : f . . < ,, >• V •. ^ ‘ 4 ■•VV , V- ^ ., t- l; ^-V 1 .1 • ••■ . i ■■■'V i ;*K I X L 6 C l|imI I i I *%*• • r ' •S ’*• J*"' t t iMiisii'SBg252:5- ifiii! i 88 i5i .»~j. -•R fliii»|i !ir' mwigSS*? 2s|9§» “«|ri|•i*- S8** !is 8 *1 •«r t / / - .*r ST'^x.bjr V •J . ' ■■ .• >■ ■■.’• i' » u. / * < ’ ’ .' v^' IP V" 1 K::m ../ o. irJUtoooviii A.c.D.t.P. lAkaaher* Setback tOM 0-75* 75-250* 350-500* SOO-1000* tot Atm XB tOBB iBiBtlag Pardcoow Xb ton* PsiBttBf riBBl ^P0»m* Burdeow JUl (0/k|Bl00 Z b Sobb (D/aIbioo -me** _2fl6Z.f . —_Q__» - .> ^ . .1 i ■Wlocom txnmTXOHt .• •tTBCtBTBB With VOOfS 0»CkB, BVBB If BlBttBd •laBBBlkO toiVBMqrB CpBBBd or ftBBBlI *f nt«ta^ «uu. XM* MU. *jy OthBr BBrfBCB thBt dOBB BOt BllOB •*»«WPtlOB Bf roiBfBlX iBtO thB fTO^ i..rAL.’i * ‘S I ijsssa BB0. 1AM ___________JSSSSgy. t—**-!*. •u-is*. niKie- md ______« bvlXdlBfS OB BdjBCBBt BUd BBBTbf lote. *»»OrBXiBB Of BBistiBf rOBldOBOB Shall bo BO •»ssBtiBg,^lfiii^g”hBrd*covBir**tA***^*** shorollBB thoro WlthiB 75 to 250 foot of tho sborBliao thoro PoroBBoot stroetBroo. WlthlB 250 to 500 foot of tho sho^iM thoM .hJ?! t «• coror. s:;--';orrr!^*“ 500 to 1.000 foot of thi^r:l7BBn;“ .ah tr«ir:/:r:7.! ar*U ”.:;.?jur“’““ ” «*s pornlt froB th« Council. shall bo renovod without first obtaining ‘ • .r- A* ' ’ ■ 1- *"■ V >.. '‘sn .'' 1^ / I 4 , - n . f V*" » V / * • • •A.>VB» CWmMCK W'i*nJ4s o»io f 1«»#. Ik. iMMt o( **^ “ **• •““*» •* ~t.r 1. th.tir- ^ ~ B. (Wl. ------------ "• " «• X.»..h,,.. i, ur»s:*r.i** aa4 250* f rea tB# r-irsi o'? ^ i:rsr*52:::i42 "* »•*** *•“ within a 1utfkMh^*sMu4'dintriit/*" ***^* * "®^ ^*** in ^Owvnri^Mt^ enlwiISlLf^ f*lfrff?LI2a <*» bn nnnd an dnnniaantor in nil X. ^22Uas Arnn - 75* s /Awnrngn width of let in 0-75* senn\ \ nonanro pnrallal to ahernlian / tS* s (Awy width) .ft. - Aron of 0-75* nonen-f. (1) 75-250* »«. - <m.„ ... lot j, ,„., ^ ^ V nnaaorn parnllal to nhernliim J * 1" 175* X #•. . .; f ——**• ,n«*. (2)CAwf width) Area of 75-250* irna Itl. 250-500* *»- • (250. « «, m a.p«, ^ ^ V Bnaanro parallol to ahorolino / 250* X (Awg width) ft. -••f. (3)Area of 250-500* aena IV. 500-1.ooo» »r- - <500. « lot d.pth i. .0.., ,/»„ ,14a, „ ^ 500-1000. .OM\ V anaatiro parallol to ahorolino ) 500* X (Avg width) ft.-- - --- - - -^r.f. (4) Area of 500-1«000* none ■■ ’. ‘r*; • • ’i k n I :mMmr4 , IV • ‘ ^'1 I ? / ! I i 4 ■' • »’ / .1 M » ■•' ■ ^ onMM 5 Ms I •o^tlmr 8 M fV M tf •5r • lA Mi ?7n #rIT M»o IS M*f t F i 9•1 9 r!♦9OjrM>O •1 «l M r i I s 4w I. •J 0 5 vn « •*I* ^ !I s:ss Ms M Ms VN ..J M I ■ m-M - ^ I ^ •'•'“■ r \ v' :. » ,>-i V ■' ' ■ .-■-; I' . ^ ■ ■ ■; •. f * ■ ■. ■■*• : , • - • • V- ; ^V - • ..• * ^ •. •,'^- i • i- •■^^•; .•■V . ..• .' ":'i A I ' h i f ■ t* ♦ n / ' '( i' %/ 01s 3 8 ft *-iA• S'•• •• t Ob•n IT• Ainn nft M if • II ^ T » M f| ^ •1 1 ^ W 9 8 1 8Iii»t 5 ^s* »e 1 • N M ■ • • I I 9^• N • • 9% m • • • • 9% 9i • •9%9%•%»% I e* s M 8 I M ♦ ♦ i: 8 8•• 8 8 8 P * ? 2 i M Jo f • 1!• 8 y M - 8 N Ms I 2^ ii M Sn t> a -1r ■ • f s X- ! v.>-‘ • • • ' V ^ Ml* ■• (* ( ■ '• •■ n rr 9% *% 9H>»ft rft9* Iftar •f o , f noM i I I %•T [| ft I 8 4 1 w 8 M e m N M M a m m • ii ^ ?5^ ' 1 8a ' 1 8 I m • f%: . s ^ I $s *8ar a •ih*•8 1 1 1 s*€1 a 8 8 5 ^58^ 5 ||8 8 M 8 •• ir Tv , *■ ['.V • i:.i ’!'i4 •Tl^’ ^•*3' .•r" i.CASCO - Mi- ■ . % A * 1 / * - * . Ik 4k I . *■ V % f 7* i 4 y. ‘ J ( r 1 I 4 . _ — 'I?^' ' h - ■nti t (•, ■••i « I' r ‘ I I U %* / V- V .4» >. X I ft S I ^ *v '■'"V ■v> 'm- ■ m ^ ‘ I > i. '-. • •^' -• . * P. ^1 ,* *- ^ jtr ■ %' - , ) ; i • *'» * • j t' ■ ■:/ ■ VA>- ■•/ . - * A S'i i »5%• \» ■^- ■ , f.. i :*i • 1 §0i • . m 'i k m f (eirr^ffffm i i f- «'Jk\ ^-asi fW'Mfflk - ^kwie&I*- ?r '•■ ^ <1 ., V '""ji i * ^.T iSKl Ilk;; likij llii =r^'f . # #1.>• '«ftN.# ^•*. :.i: V- V ■'•n ■ !► •• 'r "*».. ; : ft , / -^iiiiiiMf ,f • — , ..: :vc .. t \ ■t ^ I. 'V •. ?. \! # ., V. ^ ^ • .»•*..V *• j * Kn •* * ■ v*Vf ,-j. mu-\ * ■■ 1 v'/~ : Y ' 9i ' \: *. \’ t. * ♦ i , !■ ♦ . '/ Y Pmim^*%—<>« mm sot 1 ATTBITZON: Villag* of Orono Manning coaHiaaion KB6MU>ZlfG: Hardeovar Varlanea Xi)^TZOil: ^{f*S.^^^****** Proparty2t3S Caaeo Point iSS SS f£? eoneamad that tiia proooaad ^»namm Si»«5{L.fcy°^***y ^ bloefcln* ear view et Leke bout*it*ilo ttat*UMmTwe^ ^ •• »*•* tha Morthaaat and ot r a garagaitructad. o pwparty. »y add »^'Vijnaa vii^ e(*oraS? "*• «» i? -Y*^^***?* .ahottld not ba grantad nnlaaa«» thet e& viS S?SS «ARLid f. N1U6U ----7MR fiQi Plaaaing CoMlsBlon ChairMui K«li«yCo«ils.loii NMdO«rs ^ City Adalnistrator Bcrnhardsen»o« Jacobs, Mllding a pira Znspaetor Juna 1C, i9§g * Variaaea • • Uat of Kxhibita ^ " Application M4K45 i * Jfop«»ty Oanars Llat Exhibit C - Plat Nap S ■ *? '»'*“« »wln«MqoMtExhibit P - Eurvay »fK4kf^ S * 5^^* PPOpcaad 3/24/tl ? ' J!!£^ *«vlaad 81ta Plan'Sim 1: *t an/liSllblt*0)^° toelluM *m provlda aaw parking County road 1> and vaSona oSir *£*! *“•oparatlon. varioua etnor araa'a to nlntaln parking dnrl^ —Meant haa raqnaatad a varlanea to parking rogolroMnta. noaiviaioo 9 - Parking ---- - - n rorloolng thla application, atafr^a -ado the folloolag flndlngat fEEfclny Varian^ ntall “ 4 scats (Assaobly Ball)260 occupant load (Assanbly Ball) Existing Unknown Eacnlrad 65 pressed naabla, thoy ara ahoSn*«^Bxhibit*^5 ‘ •»» •>• long, Orono eodo raqnlraa^at ttev "• !»' 10.«1, dnbdlolalon « P). <•“ »'«»»■Inlnun of 60* wide with a backlna ^ ' tohlblt E should ba a •A* 1. only 55', 5- Sf thi roVlroi 6 “~" ®" on tho*pliS®li®3$. Vr “ahoVt^^* " ahonld ba a -Inlmm of 40> wldo, abown available "n tU“lj2er"lot.'’^*’^* atatlng that parking la 'c» A «5?t > m i:'■ .:•■■■m .k \ •»>r ”a -■ A-’ ■v-v .. i I i 1 A '■ tet ^ - Jl •• • f ■*' ''r If a ■ ft il =? 5 ;s ■1 loniag Fil« #1293 Pag* 3 of 2 teiotino nmm np that tha •trnctura\ncpoacha?intV^hl? hponghtI*«iia. It waa alao diaevaaad tha^ •*!! •action of llavarra •JT1..4 to Mk. oppllctlo. to ,.c.t. th. -nl-VroTW.'Sioyi}'’;."^;: Vzotriaoo'4o'feilol^ iof*tJ>*.i^**’**^^*’***”“ **• *••>»•« antiX applloant lo 2. in 3. 4. loisMsr* ^ p^iV23UiVMrtSS~^St55S*25d*Li*IS” 4 • P^'Vr T .■ :} ' 'a' mwnmm ■:'‘my. . : -7 ■ •■ ■ ^ ■ •' ■■••'. ^ r * t . r-' > •«■ —i»ju, • J '-V- ' *•> ■■ *‘ »--i V .,.;.A-*- :-' ^-r** .-• ■ . - 1* I•> ' ' '. -M' .- - y vj- .: ■ r -‘i, I f t - t **1 ^ • A '' ‘ \ j ft08B Amrainoir'';vi ^.)cm or tmmo - q McnnoaSit. Addr... _^3£^ ‘•^.SSUSii5Tr4.-TnraSr25,”---- ‘® •PPllc.tloo it not InelndM utucaa* . __Addros. 4tto r,j at diff.rwt Oi h 'r:rn Phon. ‘"“'‘’--iULll^tZiiffliSeal City _ _ tip ayii Addr... flu ♦• a * Current Pm - aet FM - Oeobla Cnrraat Jkpplleatien ya« ______ 1100.00 a) _______ 1150.00 b) - 0150.00 e) - 1250.00 d) - $200.00 f) mi t 01 CEU 150,00 ■••idmitial .MSAasAM. n wffiC2 71 150.00.oc.»ry om Kcan-mm m InaUtutlonai (ebareh, Mbeol. Mo. BnplM Cr«Ut/»ld« ®****F®^i/Indii.trl.l Vm Aand Altaratloa n^uS^ - —n~t.d MtlMd or Of lakSahorS staining walla within 75• "- -PRD/pid - saa faa aehadnla A*JUCA»X0«B - $150.00 CoMMrcial si^* Bia« « . --------$250.00 Vacation *" **^***^ <♦ eonsnltant faaa) --------S^lo’on Vacation = «tS:o®S ««> *«Mi.i.io„ $100.00 Appeals i ■ * - foa achadula A *• . \ • '»> ,•» J |- - m ^ '• ' ■' ■ ■ ^ • a<' r •’A-) $1^ r .4 I v^, •.X - > ' jr <• ^ ; V « r-' osi or rootanPr^Mnt Zoning District fLestO€MT,Mi. Present Use of Property ________— Residential Other (specify) i • IDiKsxmoB or Describe request in detailt ME... ify»ic/erc em^ur^ Ceople^ Application Ponu thlJ “?? HVnn.5?Volntr O^MrSS;?* **®‘ ‘'®" ®*»‘**“Center 348-3271) . , ^ •Phrteent of Pinance A-803 Goeerasient Steeped, legal sised enTelopes (#10) ^ . 2^1 ** “•* *' **“ “«»• ^^Tzxttemtm of survoyB cc«.t™^io. pi„. i*’:sriciSxV?2.‘\“L^r?2rUir-«.t.,. not been included. not coapiete if the above infonation has crtificti«i by lonin, Zoning Officials Signature JC 6. T. 8. Applicant's signature APfuauff's szomtm “ * reque^ifed i?\hiT*i^^ng^AXinist£tor^^* infomation required or the infonation eupplied l^^true certifies thatknowledge. pp**na^ true to the best of his/her ___ -------«»t« s^/^/y^F (TIIMIM SZOMtim •PPllc.tion .nd futth.r •pent., co«.l..ioi? -V-Sr“ 'V"' “““Itbat.. invaitigation ud varif^tion of tuJp^,tt. "•■'*•'• *** purpo... of Own.r'. .lynaturo _ p.t, f/l/Zt/T third Monday of each nonth. AonlTellSt^^IIlil Meetings are held on the review meetings of the Plannlna^^ComS^Jliafi HIS •!! scheduled unable to attend a sch^ulSd SeetJli Council, if «„ applicant is authorised agent attend in vour Please make arrangements to have an Offlee of this change prior to the*^iS5tlSg.^ advise the Building & Zoning H' : F r. > m ■ i* 1 • j»r • f / i V./: j'‘ / U I ■'I 1 . ^ I i^|6isiSS* -*IS- liMi”§|S|*? li|2i ”3s §-**♦5 iiii! -ii§8* I i'llI!s!L..siii^S !Plii!5f*3 rMill!I* i| i**S r-«sM M. ^ ■■ c iilii* iSfefe pis iSPP I M t tn s'iiIflii!'IlfH II ip; .' !! ii‘sS* •i gM Sir !;i! 4. SK 'I i If sc s!• -flr ♦ : I ) i < I ^ • » 1• ^»r—« / —»Xi {^: Q IIPi'll|iMi!B s s ! iK*i!fi.l C S**1 iI p »i 33 * "y* . V 'iF^. ‘ Ui rV ';r ■V i \ \■ I A • ' *• '- ■■ *:‘'.i- 1b v-v • ...' ^ » i « « •1 1 ■ ■ V ' /,'r!, 'i k- . •1 • 4 V ^ , ' . ' 'i r • * •* ’i* * •(/ ■ , ^ .. . # %i» « i V •' * ■-•T ■• ■ 4 •* r ■’i f •* |8|8S«4lVl*:88l2a81^•! im*i?y2*3 5 “s=2^ 8 s8 *7 I I 8 M 8O 8 iijilii8S illEi! 2Ml bS 88 ijip:>l:li| 8«S8 :lHm s s>i IHifIII!8-- ’1818888Mfifs» I iflfi! *l”,2 8 S* <f I Z iiii * VM I Iff Ii8 t * I ♦ .♦ l-.i • » i iiiii!'iiiim r 8 8 8 iSL-i! / '-To •je*^ kjp* S>^ .-f V/ ^1^si fSiiSBe!!88. '%■ Ip 3 k. c J ? .» I i? 7 =:%; 's'/1 *«v• s**i^—irar... *c * » Sb;’: '•: V; ■i ^ lV:.:: is^ n / } j fti. ! . ? .* J • I f I »£ t I I- f 'v ^ r i- ■,■■’ f;: ' . '^•.^f ' f . r*-'.4K"/ ^ A ip“*f»/.■Vis-Slf •*• • -V* - -.V S• .•'. ■%,. •• . « srz^* l?^io /'?V- / / w // I' i i j ; iiA^i, n ij»^u ii-fiori^.tT-'. M »<iw: j M*) . I- I i ! 1 1* I irj t«^ .••.iMr;SlJltitS. •■ t - I -1 -■ ! J-4fli)Kii»i¥iirm^ *! ^Ir-" » nmm I-, ^ •; . ■ «‘T «>i: !<y i(ji • **« \” - 4 ^ jtm ? ^t« .27;n^: i ^' W ■ •• # [▼*. fh* CP-TW iWj • •< ^0_•‘ .^ -1 i-‘i.Vj ’■rr^rr » 0 l« -e :itR« !£» ^1 «ta4» •f"»~ •• ’4«'f«''C JOlO Lf It "»/% ' #v - ^’u T:^-OH»y9 iV **• 4* 7 0 '^K . •’V r^,;- 'U'k44 • *» -i• « •. U «8I •*'*•••- » . . «i« '^‘T, * *“ i \^- ‘? r* Q / \ •-.(31) - . I r«" 1- ‘ •;. — ‘ - " i % h )>>' •I % ‘. t- ‘^31?l v ’•i■\.t% V « f • V* 9 '. i ; :i£niSlii¥'4♦«;-t« » % *. !• or lAxuiemTB OF NXIIIIB80TJIcoom OF nmBFxir cm OF OKOMO ) ) ) ••. ) ) t:> h«:sv cVti?; t'h.v o/iSb?!"s“S5is,‘5i.:;:r»' *“”• - this nh”Jir” ^ssjr'wwf **•'•“*<* ••* -r ".sd ..d sssi i.c_iV ^S! I • •• ^ ^ r . • . i- ■•;• i',- f-'.. /.■* -■ ;:/■;^■ ■ ■.- '-'f- ■■■ ■' :■■■ S- '.- .-vll ■ -.■ . . cm or omam » r- ‘r; ‘ r ‘ -I'--/--* :: ■• y .•»»> i -. V. V- > / . ♦ at 1275 South Brown^*Road ^on**Monday^^ ^*** Council Chanberamatter of reviewing the f^lloSlSJ'P-M. on theproposed 3 lot residential aulSlvAlii *^289 for aCrystal Bay Road. •uooivlslon of property located at 115 Oldiid V.VAc?*;a%i;n\Vs*i^^^^^ tiiiAYoifa?**®'* t*«dcov.rImprovaments and construction of lakUldS deJk. iBndscape variance to co»*tw<YoYgarage^adStlwif^^"^ •••ks a hardcover Shore Drive has^flled**"a ^^renewal^cinditi 2885 Horth Improvement plan previously VpTroved bYehiYii. •» ^"rlU2?«tV!" "* * "•* «nd c«‘V^\*»’T«a;«n ,n.a. Tnrnbu ^a?'*Mckif^*l\4 •‘••‘variant loeataa at KS or a lot that does not meet the fYviicA residencedistrict. '**• •®'® standard for the toning to a, “ilSrtU 'but*VaVlU?;' .V•••>' •" •'••Shaayimoa *oaa. "“liobbillty of th. pretatty loeataa at lt)5 fila“”2oI!2!“"S“l?r;?«'io.?L2t?’ ■®»lv«ra h«a a -alor aaaitlo. to tb. a&th 45? u'aVo?4:%3l^%f’“.l«”iSr vacatl”*are^1?Mtion’£or'*tr.a”raiLlBino ai«S*Li*''*""* "•• •Boulvara aa aeaicatoa in tha plat o/stiSJl???! E“V”*J ®* »»»•»» Coonty. Mlnnaaota. Thl. «oi«p?o?.a aaSlSitSis^„"o’ ““ ••“ ••‘"•“S.*:£^j;2i?'i:s.Tit;i5Vt".‘’c'it'rSf use porait^foJ^an^axlStiBp »uia.^g^?,t'l?abl^ii2? e««>ltional ~J?AViUS^'riKX.l5”*^ ss3i;‘“Si,“j: Ssi^ii^tTs;^ s'ys;, City of Orono ByI Planning Commission JeaWne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of June 6, 1988. m MittSi. ’.Si*! • ? . i O QQ V V .? ..V O j?May 24, 1988 To: Orono City Planning Conmlttee FROM: Grace Baptist Church of Navarre ■ K.affVK^n^pt'rraa DESCRIPTION REQUEST Grace Baptist Church is requesting permission to expand our present parking lot and to surface it with black top (as p 'r the proposed drawing). It is our purpose to improve the property we have as well as take parked cars off County ^Rbad 19 during our meetings (especially after the anticipated improvements by Hennepin County). We are requesting a variance in regards to parking spaces: According to Orono City Ordinance, Section>10.61, Subdivision 10.E, the number of parting spaces required (based on the number of seating in our sanctuary), would be 65. We are requesting 41 spaces at this time. This is due primarily to cost and need. Our church attendance does not warrant (at this time) any mom parking spaces. We also have additional space in our lower lot. Respectfully Submitted IflRev. William K. Mulligan f FT V ' ' t - 'W i • •i 4* ' . • t ' ;:y Seal ■" - D'lte 0 & 1 i. i 4? "*N' \ ' i:^ Plot of Survey for Calvary Memprlal Chxirch in Wiley's Navarre Addition, and Lot 5, Block 3, Townsite of ... Langdon Park % '^ ♦ "nv:-. V* *v%y . /' w? 'VA// _ , / •7^ j • 7*. ,. ■/. ' '•.‘-. ' ■*./N^-'7 ..... / .. V*... ^ ^ / 7p/^ /V*‘ <P:? i - 7 ^ ^ . V, ^ / ’ / >!^‘'•*'•'T- ‘; ^ - / \ V: • // , . 9S*sk*¥^*n <»»1 TiV^ / \ .» .. .•4^4t- ' a" 9S'sk^¥<*n CiO^ -/ . - / * V I * Lmn:^46n^ri-,j / 7 ' / 7 : . ^ < Z«o«* of Leii 2iani 2f actoromo h rr. TV' T**. >•• •.' 4«o«* 0/ Lett 21 an4 2T accpramo > i^/ tfw of occ<ff>aiien in WJe/s/«V / .J / /. •. ■■ ...■' Certificate of Survey:. I hereby cortl.'*y that' thin is n true ond cor- * rect representation of a . survey of the boimdorles of I/Jts 19, 20, 21, and 22, Wiley's favurre Addj- , • tlon. Lake Minnetonka; and that part of Lot 5, Block 3, Townsite of Langdon Pork, doacrlbed as . follows: Beginning at tho Northearterly comer of sold I.<ot 5; thence Northwesterly along the Northerly line of. said TiOt 5 to the Northeasterly - v litjv of the public highway run ning ocrosr. said Lot 5 and known os Minnetonka Lake Park and ?inplo Plain Road (now County Road Kc. 19); thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of said roar' to the Raaterly line of Lot 5. thence N'ortherl.v along the Easterly line of soid Lot 5 to point of beginning, and . ........*2e > • Afarfhrt'Iy iiri" cF < Lot 5, Bt. 'H.'Jent.’nstfy cf Lantjdcn Poi'k.as y V' • •' .• -. \ iHoos^ ' ■ ' A.- -'- ; / / ‘ .X. . . . \ /A if: . ,k ; r. r- ■: /"«- />..>, ■.< ■ •Vr . . 'Lit*St4>r/v frn^ of road as.Shewn on eiof ef .'■ V./^ 7J." i • ,, - ^ ‘ Thiffnsii* ^ ' //''?»'/. : * V' -* r»" __ 9jr.y Sashrly linf of ^^^,8/3,1^ ' : \ - .' 7cy^ns:tref'^snqifon Park^lK ; ■ ■ • i <- '/ Vi »,* » '• #/Lr > •* .'i-• CHURCH € I ».i >> •‘v of tho locntdon of ell buildings there-_' . A*. ' ..on,.^?iTid all vi.sible encroachments, if .7^ ■'any, f*T>iD.dr-on said-Jland, - • .V • -t ,9- *• . ‘ * • i .’ r../ .. fl f •: •-r -n. . =. «. J ■ - .. ‘**V 'r/akfj eyaJeers ^ . {' A 4^. . • / •** ' - r- 4V /. .V.V'-. Scale: -!•' = 60'; Dete : -^-15.-71 • o Iron marker ;.. - . f...' .. . ... ’’■•i** ♦ ■; •* \ ‘ ’ ‘i '* ■ *. ■ es shown on'r*Lti Ot --V '7777 7^7-L •"7-‘. . . •/ * ‘ - SB corner a* . _ • r ■•■•-•• • . , •.'•• . •-■w.-rJ w Syef/c^ ir-/Jr-^Ty . - - . ' “ - ^. /. __' y ■ i-il/,; • . --------c- - m vi 7- r ■■•V 1 4 A* } jF' T, ( • f 7 . • */ I ' t 1 1is #• \ ! V • < ’ * y} y/' ''4 { • •. ■ i' • 'r RB6UXAR MBETZN6 OP TRB ORONO OOONCXL, JOPB IS, IfTt Exhibit C - Plat aap indieatinE loeatimi of subjaet proparty. Varianeaa naeaaaary for approval t 1. Lot araa • 27,220 aq.'ft. 2. Lot width - <4 ft. 3. Stxaat aatbaek - 24 ft. Planning Cniinnion Moating - Nay t, 1970 Applicant Tiaothy Gagnar was praaant. Applicant atatad hacdahipa to lot wars losing two trass and noving wall if garage wars built within tha aatbaek raqniraoanta. Tha let slopai ataaply downward froo road to yard laval. Jin Olsen askad whathar axisting blacktop araa was largo anoogh to turn around in * applicant atatad it was. Pago If VAMAMei 740 TCnkawa Road (Oontinuad) • a 1. - ^ :|| I ; ,-I •lha Planning Ceswiasien nnaninoorly approved tha variance of 24 ft. Oonncil Moating • June IS, 1978 Pasak novad, Butler sacendad, to approve tha variance of 24 ft. straat satba^ raguast of Tinethy Gagnar, 740 Tcnkawa Road. Notion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Nr. Alan Olson, City Planner, antarad into tha record tha xaqMst for a conditional use paxadt of Grace Baptist Church, 2380 Bhadywood Read, dated Nay 18, 1978, which stataat Tha applicant wiahas to transfer tha ownarahip and eparation of tha axisting buildings at 2380 Bhadywood Read fren Calvary Manorial Church (whidi congregation is noving to tha Blisabeth Gardner BCheol Building) to Grace Baptist Church (which congregation is currently housed at 2443 rwaniTs Boulevard, Mound). There is no proposed change in the use of tha property fren tlia currant 4sa. A conditional use pamULt is required under Baetion 34.022. Tha previous application of New Norison Enterprises for use of this building as a day care canter has net been proeaasad. Tha applicant lias net eontaetad tlia Ci^ since March 27, 1978. Tha only issues apparent to staff are as follows i 1. Identify extant of axpaetad "normal church functions* 2. Review parking aituation and posaibla inprovenants 3. Review possible future straat vacation of eleaad Navarra X«ana where tha building currently anereaehas • V. Grace Baptist Chur^ (Oontinuad) ■.mk4 .* •) y % ' 1 “Ir* . 4. w * ‘ -.*< ■•'-■ *<* ^ ‘ •■■^ .'..^'^r.-j- a> « 0 • % , * » . t: %' I"' \N', ♦- ih:- « ^;>- ■r ■ ->r •■V ^ • t • ■'•iV 1 REQJM MEETZII6 OP THE OMMO OOOIICXX.* JIMB 15, 157t Planning Co—taaion Moating • May 32, 1975 Lowall litsloff and Um Baas lay aaxa prasaht for tha applieanta* Thoy indicated t^nt tKay had a valid purchaoa agcaa—nt and tha> i rior agras—nts had bean withdravn. Thair pcopooad usa aoold ba for nor—1 diurch fonetiono of a congragation of 42 faailiaa (106 paopla), appxoxi—taly 1/S of tha sisa of tha axiating church. No day cara cantor or othar unuanal osa is contaaplatad. Planning Oo—tssion racos—ndad approval of tha conditional usa paxsdt transfar. Council Moating -* Juna 15, 197t • • .t • Mayor Van Hast novod, Butlar sacondsd, to approve the conditional usa pamit transfar for tha Grace Baptist Church, 2380 Shadyvood Road. Motion, Ayes C4) - Nays (0). Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, antarad into tha record tha following rsquast of John Swanson, 2795 Casco Point Road, for a conditional usa pamit, dated April 18, 1978, which statast inhibit A - Application for approval of conditional tiss pamit to add two —rs rasidantial units to existing msidsnca to ba used as guest houses for the fmilias of both —n and wife of subject household. Tha walkout basssMnt would ba expanded and ranodalad as a separate msidential unit for one of the fanilias and tha second unit would ba added above a proposed double garage to be attadied to tha house. Exhibit B - Survey of subject property indicating lot dinsnsions, location of existing structuras and proposed nacassary additions to provide for two additional rasidantial units. The property is located in an LR*1C soning district. (1/2 sere or 21,760 sq. ft. area and 100 ft. lot width required) Tha subject lot neats lot area raquirs—nt and 80% of lot width require—nt. Property is sa—rad and aasassad for one unit. Exhibit C - Section of plat —p indicating location of subject property. Applicant has submitted one sat of plans for projsctad renovation if proposal is approved. Page 30 . # . CONDXTXCMAL USB PESMlT 2380 Shadyvood Road (Continued) OONOXTXONAL USB FBRNZT 2795 Casco Point Road •377 r- John Swanson ^ 4 •1 i- ..v» y ‘i- % I » ^ V'' f, / V /■ W5 namlns 0»—IMloo tut CouBoU OMH: Atei r. 01io«. City n«m« 3 ' #3»4' DATE: M«y W* W78 I • • i • .* SUBJECT:OonditionAl Ui« P«tjlt Gr«e« Baptltt 2380 SiMidriood Bo«d t ,»iie«.t *ubj.«. f?-*r«*SLr:s'‘iS.f ftS*cS^ p .• ,t c!r^J4”»5idii«i «t sr£iir,t». MMorlAl Church (idilA ®®®8*^*M «a®tlct Church (uhlch SSiAcr School Building) J® It*S43 Co«rco Boulounrd, M U eurrtiitly^w « of th. ptop«ttr «r./T4;3tSS2i«.. p.*-* i. under Section 3A.022. M\• tt. prtloB. .ppll..tlon of S.‘«« e^Hetod th. City .Ino. «*«»' «• ««* A _ « n A ft. ooly !.«-• -PP**"* “ •” “ m t ittuoc mypm^mu^ ----------- - p. B. PB# Mnceted ”nomil churdh functioni. 1. Identify extent ^ eotciblo inprov etntc. ’• !SiS.’2~ iS.Si^ /■ .f/l Planning Conmiatlon Meeting - May 22, 1978 ■v\ Lowell Zitaloff end Lou Beasley were P*J*fJJ^*JLj^ient^and that They Indicated that^they f ^ ^iheir propotad use would be for normal church functions J?” ^f the existing church. (106 people), musMl^use is contemplated. PUnning No day care center y othe conditional Use PermitCoimission reconnended approval ot cne w«» transfer. _ 1 jr. H V* *'■ i'. * • • 7. Tot Planning Conmiasion Chaiman Kelley Orono Planning Conmisaion Membera City Adminiatrator Bemhardaon Dates Jeanne A. Kaboathr Building fc Zoning Adniniatrator June 16, 1988 Subjects 91295 John McDowell 165 Turnham Road - Variance - Public Bearing Boeing District - RR-IA Required area ■ 5 acrea Required lot width • 300' At the rear of the 100* front yard aetback. i^n^licatioe Lot Area Varianca Section 10.27, Subdiviaion 5 Required ■ 5 acrea (minlaun 2 acres contiguoua plus three additional dry acres) “ 4.29 dry acres .03 acres wetlands at northwest corner ofproperty Variance « .71 acres or 14% List of Bahibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Nap Exhibit D - DNR Letter 7/29/83 Exhibit E “ Survey Exhibit F - Access Drive Napping Exhibit G - Septic Report Exhibit R - Wetlands Map Exhibit 1 - Ownership - Record of Existing Land Dse Review of Application For nany years the subject property was owned by Winnifred M. Bryant as a lot of single seperate record and not owned in conmon with adjacent properties. The lot was created prior to the January 1, 1975 adoption of the current RR^IA zoning code. It appears the 4.32 acre property was created prior to even 1 acre zoning within the area. The property consists of 4.29 acres of dry contiguous land, .03 acrea of wetland is designated at the northwest corner of the property. Review Exhibit H. Septic testing confirms adequate area for a conventional on site septic system for the primary site and a mound system for the alternate site, located to the south of the subject property where the house is proposed, review Exhibit G. Planning Commission members willing to hike up through the woods to the top of the hill will find a trail leading to the site approximately 100' from the intersection of the Luce Line and the private driveway. There is a mowed horse trail along the south side of the Luce Line that would take you along the north boundary of 1r <r. .y % ■ •• - f« w i •. .» •» \ • V ^ Zoning File 11295 Page 2 of 3 Access to this site has always been the issue surrounding the buildability of the site. The difficulty surrounds the section of easement that extends from Turnham Road running north and south to the Luce Line. The applicant owns the rod wide track along the north side of the Luce Line up to an extention of the west border of the subject property. Review Exhibit F. Prior to the issuance of a building permit* the applicant must provide proof of legal access through the properties on the north side of the Luce Line and the appropriate lease from the DNR for the use of the Luce Line right-of-way. In review of contemporary land use records* approximately the last 10 years* the only area variance in -the 5 acre zone was the recent Weestrand Application #1161. The Weestrand property consisted of a total area of 4.76* 1.24 acres wetlands* for a total of 3.52 acres of dry land. The application not only involved setback variances and a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a driveway within the outer areas of the subject wetland* but also involved the issue of common ownership. As the memo stated above* this property is not involved with the issue of common ownership and has been under single seperate ownership for many years. One of the findings in the approval of that variance application by the City Council was that there was no adjacent lands available. Staff can find no confirmation that there was ever a denial on the part of Nr. Kokesh to sell contiguous lands to Mr. Weestrand. ^If the Planning Commission feels that this is a valid consideration for* this review that there are adjacent undeveloped lands available* review Exhibits H and I. The parcel owned by Reiersgord has 5* acres of dry* contiguous lands and it appears to be land locked. There is an adjacent property* approximately .89 acre dry* contiguous land adjacent on the west side. If the Planning Commission feels it appropriate* the applicant may be asked to attempt to acquire adjacent available lands. Reiersgord already has a potential buildable lot and may not be interested in selling. In review of the south 1/2 section of 31* parcels: 11 or 35% are one acre or under 2 or 6% are between one and two acres 2 or 6% are within two to four acres 17 or 53% are between five and ten plus acres out of the 32 independent Staff Recommendation To recommend approval of the area variance for the property located at 165 Turnham Road based on the following findings: 1. The property consists of 4.29 contiguous*dry acres and satifies the required lot width with 330* of lot width to the rear end of the front yard setback line. 2. On-site septic testing confirms adequate area for on-site sewage treatment systems for principal and alternate dralnfield sites. 3. The subject property was a conforming lot prior to the January 1* 1975 rezonlng to 5 acres. Prior to that date the lot area standard was 1 acre. 4. The development of this property will have no adverse impact on TjoJt oJF a_lijpv_______feLULJLJLj(5LaLJhJLj& supjp®jb Ijb Ijcl “I I‘ar. .•i V f ■ ^ I *f i • y-.i r Hr' ft • '1 * »i V f ■ ■ - m r .i ■ r A ' t • - / ♦> •■•i { !; ii ft r1 Zoning File 11295 Page 3 of 3 excess of the 2 acre mininura lot size required to assuage the concerns of health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Orono. 5. The City of Orono Cosqjrehensive Management Plan, Part 2, Chapter 4, page 4->28, the rural residential section of the land use plan, states that for the area zoned 1 dwelling per 5 acres, "the citizens in this area have a traditional desire for more intensive rural and quasi^agricultural activities which require and support the larger minumum lot density. Thus, historic land use and not environmental concerns has determined this land use classification*. This approval is subject to the following conditionst a. Applicant must provide a legal access easement via either the Peterson or Frizler properties running north and south from th* extension of Turnham Road to the north border of the Luce Line and a current leas? for use of the Luce Line as access to the property on the south side, at the time applicant applies for a building permit for new construction. Payment of a park fee in the amount of $150.00 to be paid at the time of application for a building permit. ' ■ m * •• vr ..i-"'m*- r- ■ "1 ■ * ■ft-' % \ • t • I ( n f < . V • ^ 'V-f. I! I '* > > ' V _■• r * • f • * \*t“ t • * > '1 >j cm OF OROMO - VARIARCB APPLICATION Initial Application Pee $150.00 ^8 ($50.00 per each additional veciAtice) ^ Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 § J ^ — (no change £rooi original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) O Q .. -? t r n propbrtt location site Address ^T^''£f 1 jI^S ^urfnha.ry) Property Identification Nunl>er (P.I.D.) tii"l^ QUO ^ Please check one - Property ^ abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name Phone (home) Wl _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work)V7 i Address: ^ ftAS (1)f_ _ _ _ Citv; Zip; ^ S"35 '/ ioH/) if OMNER (if different than applicant) Name i L1,^ 9 &V& Phone (home) 5 Phone (work) Address: f. A P>d > City; Date Property Acquired "j)^(L. <5*^ Zip; S^Sle (month/year) CITY OF CROWI (do) no^ also o%m the adjacent parcels of land. ririh'mc PRESENT 08B OF PROPBRTT ^^''''^''oToEH 150.00 rrAiA«r£ Present Zoning District Present Use of Property CHECK JL 150.00RccEiPT-rmm you uosmo cool ROl T13:LResidential 05/2u/S Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request : Estimated Construction Cost $ VARIANCES REQUIRED ________ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other •w F" • ill * r i •• ^ i • « f* . / * f '/ 1 HMi ■'r 1 V^,-i :rHARDSHIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; %. fT<^. LC-TT OlIPTIOH OF UHOSUAL PROPBRTY COHDITIOMS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ >.S h t- ' . 1- * RBQOIRBD SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of o%mers within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^3. Stamped* legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property o%mers list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application* please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional it&aa as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICAMT'S SIGNATURB ^ ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator* agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. ^ \ Applicant's Signature Date 1C> I St OWNERS SIGNATURB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff* consultants* agents* Commission members* and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification/#>f this recAiest. Owner 's re<^est Signature ^. Date . Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning 4* r 4; t* * V i - * ^ . ( * r •7 1 b 3 m * • r V - V' ' v.^,. ! i7 :J. „-,,’^^’‘K'- 5 I :\ > •A. I•- :V V 1/ ««i8^ m C/I ^ 9C m M •"8ggXH ni M P^sq SS5“ IW ^ "O H 30I5\-Siii ni Hm 8;« sis O ni fo =^S)! gy•O nj n iSsi s S” 8 55:5* -o ^ o 09 f— cn ac -o >m 90 rr •-• 30se ^ -o iisi (Jl o cji m OJ U1 “O CO r-s 3^ CO 00 CO I CO Iro CO so CO 3 „..S i^zS s §* iii: '«sn» ss- i^S P CO CO to 8 5 i sslf K S S » ni ffi ^ 30 30 ui X ro ro Ul MM$qss* I Ui ►- I 01 Irv) Ui $ m $ ii|ifO ► * _ > ro 2 S|»is m HI S^SS 2 ^ M 2 ® ► M M Si-a a^ss S ^ CO M I Iro Ui # Ui *0 CO o o '"55® *ssfi I'Sp Ui ►«• I M M ?a s 3 8Is e s C as !■ a 2 2 H H > > a 2 H H m ro 2 R*l*aM$w 1»«•88 1 |M ,S-'8 Tr- t-4 t- m »« »i* 21 3S 21 gs^sss2 m 6 m M • 2 2 88 2 2 a5S*SS*c53g»2 2 55? O O O a" PS O 2 o 2 a s<o 11 8 fS 8 »« V ^>6 2^11 Jljji H 2 2 CO CO til 8gS. 2 2 2 M P M I ®»as5 2 M I Co k " 3r 2 0 0 .a^c» •Dssq 2 2a 2 M I 21 2 2 5 « 10mI 2 M S ^ 2 ■ “ V .*' f, . • , / / • i I • f ♦ , ♦ f' ■^■- :‘l ": ........................ / '.,|li.r^.^.illi .i»V,ii« iffl 'I• f-‘' -:V.-f\:J- ..'■?.. 'ril■•' 1. ■' •:■• S m - •• •t}v«v'*?,V?l ,f gjgmiill te «t*t| o* '^OEPARScm OF NATURAl RESOUIICES 29$-9n5 **®® Warner Hoat*, C«. I'auI, itn D Mr*l < nl *4'»_________ July 2‘>. r^*?3 8tu Lenox 2636 Inicpc'.ntfenre Poa«1 Haplo Plal>w WN 053*j ‘> Dear Btut Ccnerally a ten year lea«« »« wrnten for privaro crcoalnot of State land. The t^n» year liwlt la aet Dy atetutea. The fee for such a erosainu is annually of the appraised value* Such a lease la aln'cat always renewed, t do not know of any case where it hsa not fceen renewed. I believe a re»|oe8t is to be filed on forn SL 19i« available from the Land bureau in the Centennial Building. The complete tranaactlcn la handled in our central office with approval from the field. I would certainly approve ttuch a crossing lease if it is held to a Mnimum spacoi I.C., 20 foct maxlrum along the l>f’P south property line running eaat of the 'furnham Road extension to the proi>erty currently landlocked and up for sale* If you have any queatlona# give mu a call at 296-^115. tUncerely* »•* JW.4 On IOS Barber Regional Trails and viaterwaya Coordinator DBltlffO lip-.1V . 1n kiCartlflcat« of^Sunre^*^ for Cla/toD and Winnli'rvd Eryant in tbe Southeast 1/U of Section 3l*lld>23 G‘3 |. ^ I hereby certify tnat this is a truie and correct representation of a survey of the bouxularies of tnat part of the bast half of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of the South east quarter of Section 31, Township 118 North, Range ?3 West of the 5th Principal Me ridian, which lies South of the luce Line Trail fformerly the Electric Short Line Railway and Minnesota Western Railroad), and the location of all exist ing bullui:.^.^. if aiqr, thereon. It does t- V purport to show other inprcrenents or eneroacn- ments. OOROOH R. COFFIN CO., INC. I" - 100' 5-9-83 Iron marker found OOraon u.jT^cu Mark S. Gronberg Reg. No.l?755 T^rA surve*/ar5? and Planners I 'if;':- • -j r > k? , '•SgE \5: iifpWMii '.:iS r ■L ,‘ ar • i- - - ^ y/ Y i-H?t ‘i . i 'ifs-sHi K ^'>■ ■ ■ .'• ■» ■: »t»-/ p. ^ K. tiiK--. .* ■ ;>. Hi t •mf*f 1r”r r il P:. • « • f • , ,r /. '♦ t, i i lt4ZM0ka V4.% I pSP «t«tl toilPPEWA H"sr t ^ T*-•I a > . iftia ■■ r.CHtmw* H •w . 4 . s < ’ r V. t* - t i I*r w i' • r \ • . ‘ Blue'Lennox & Gary Petersen *^73 Merrill Lynch Realty 315 East Lake Street Hayzata# MN 55391 Results of Percolation Test at SE 1/4 of Sect. 30-118-23 Orono. Primary Site Results: Hole #1 - 48.0 min./in. Hole #2 - 60.o min./in. True Perc Rate » 54.0 min./in. (Conventional system allowed) Alternate Site Results: Hole #3 - 60.o min./in. Hole #4 - 68.6 min./in. (Alternate moxind system allowed) True Perc Rate * 64.3 min./in. In the Primary site area a conventional system coUld be installed, however, it should be installed very shallow because of mottled soil level at 3.8* and 4.0*. The method of installing the system should conform to the design allowed by the City of Orono, dated 7-15-83. This design states that fill be brought in over the area (preferable topsoil or sandy loam) before the trehches are installed. In this case at least 12" of dirt should be placed over the area, however, this is up to the inspectors decision; also one should consult the memo from Orono to see a detail of this shallow trench method. For a 3 l^edroom house, the size of drainfield needed would be 1,000 sq. ft. or 5 lines 3* x 75*. The depth of the trenches should not exceed 16"-20'* with 12" of rock \mder the pipe and only 6" of cover over the system for proper evaporation. Drop boxes should be used to fit the system to the shape of the hill. 2 - 100 gallon tanks must be used (city code). See design enclosed. 4' Site Evaluator Robert A. Koch - MPCA #00107 r I- * r, . / » / f. « I • t i ■ • :■ t ■ • ■ lA-I r 75*^ (Z/*&^ ^£' *i/ ^J'*e^.«f/-//y- V—.» ■ p V ^r /"*.74r' ^•Ay A caiAl*^ i n»>,-AO^ •s » V, y ■ I •• *-^'Si^ ( '^' iV ^1.' ■ ^-r,. P'^. -.' t - S'. . y . \ i ;) • f' ♦ ’•.L .,YT. It' r 7* . V ' *•> *,' C* • r < ‘ '/ If I • ■ > V' » ^ * • 1 n• • ■'. ** ^ A ♦ ''i'l, ”n 4^’ ¥: #■ !•: :* y:./ .* - a ^ « ' #' ) vm 8 Frost Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator June 17, 1988 Subjectt #1296 Merritt J. Peterson and Rick Stodola 1895 Shadywood Road - After-the-Pact Variances - Public Hearing Soniiig District - LR-IC Total Area ■ 5,500 s.f. (approximate building envelope - thin strip of land running south to Coffee bridge not included) • average width in the area is approximately 25'. Application Illegal dock constructed in May of this year without building permits. The dock shall not be used by applicant until this matter is resolved, review Exhibit D. - No principal structure exists on the property - applicant advised to file for a lot area variance to determine buildability and if not what reasonable use can be made of the property. Pertinent Ordinances , , , To determine the variance for lot area. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) Required ■ 21,780 s.f. Existing ■ 5,500 s.f. Variance - 16,280 s.f. or 75% To construct a residence on this property would require an average lakeshore setback variance (Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B), an excessive lakeshore setback variance (Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B), and even more excessive hardcover variances (Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 (B). Pertinent Ordinances Related to the Illegal Dock/Accessory Stmctnca Constmcted on Property without a Principal Residence Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (A) Time of construction - No accessory structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory. Section 10.25, Subdivision 5 (A) Accessory uses - Any accessory use as regulated in the RR-IA district, any private docks subject to the City Code and other applicable regulations, including boat storage density regulations. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Violation Letter to Applicants Tillotsen Survey (1875 Shadywood Road) Mapping of Current Ownership Wetlands Map RLS-1216 Tracts F S G (0013 6 0014) ‘_ _ __ t , '>K4i)Wil^Sk ‘I . '.41^ : \ 1 1 . a i . v» ■? • V’-' * 1‘ - A‘f/ . V V ) >* if-. * • Zoning File 1296 Page 2 of 6 Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - RLS-1216 Tracts B, C, D & E (0009, 0010, 0011, ( 0012) Legal Decription of RLS~1216 Highway Easement Plans of Lots Discussed in Lot Area Table History of the Properties All seven parcels within RLS-1216 have been under the ownership of Miriam and Ewald H. Gustafson for many years. It is staffs understanding that Miriam Gustafson is a member of the original Coffee family that owned the majority of the properties within the area. In fact, prior to their recent move to Excelsior, the Gustafsons lived across the street at 1890 Shadywood Road. Staff remembers meeting with Mr. Gustafson a few years back to discuss what potential the property had in its present configuation. This would mean consideration of all seven lots combined as one unit. It should be noted that these lots were never legally combined, but remained single separate lots of record. It was staff's recommendation to file for the lot area variance as it appeared that parcel 0003 would have the greatest lot depth but without the necessary updated survey locating the present water line and county right-of-way it was difficult to give direction. At that time staff had no knowledge that Mr. Tillotsen's residence and driveway intersected the subject parcel, review Exhibit E. In fact, Mr. Tillotsen's dock is located on Tract F, the same tract that applicants have installed dock. Review Exhibit I. The applicants have advised that it is their understanding that Mr. Gustafson has some kind of arrangement with Mr. Til lot sen to sell the encroached parcel to him at some time in the future. Without the "OOOa* property, the property is clearly not a buildable lot, review staff sketch Exhibit H. There isnobuilding envelope and if the lot was deemed buildable, it would require the granting of multiple, excessive variances to all lakeshore ordinances. It is clearly not the intent or wishes of the present applicants to apply for the lot area variance. The recent county road acquisitions have placed even more restrictions on the building envelope. Planning Commission members will note the stakes of the additional right-of-way in relation to the subject property. Staff has advised the applicant that in order to make any decision on an accessory structure or use of the property that the bulldability of the lot must be resolved by the City. Please review the table listed below of recent lot area variances dealing with lakeshore properties similar to this one. *t t • * • ^ » • n-- ■ < • * 1 u * ■ \ w •« mm mm m mm. mm Page 3 of 6 Property ^rea Restoration On Building Envelope Lakeshore/ Non-Lakeshore Existing Structures Approved/ Denied_ LaBresh - Appl. «999 S«300 s.f. LR-IC 21,780 S.f. required Narrov lot depth, excessive lakeshore and vetland setbacks, with county road right- of-way increased next to bridge. Lakeshore Cabin (has bldg) assessed for sewer and water but not connected• Total replacement. Denied 6-23-86 Pemberton - Appl. #983 1^* 11,130 *.f. LR-IC 21.7,0 a.f. requir.<) Harrow lot depth. 75* lakchor. setback on both east and west. Lakeshore Existing residence hooked to SM»er. Total replaceawnt. Approved 1-13-M Beintz 8,300 s.f. LR-IB 43.5,0 s.f. required Harrow lot depth with Lakeshore total of 100'- multiple, excessive variances required for residence. Undeveloped. Hot assessed for sewer Haver assessed as buildabl. lot based on market valuation. Denied 3-16-78 Subject Property 5,500 S.f. IB-IC 21,780 s.f. required \ • *•» V ' fi'. r ■’ yr * Harrow depth of buildinq envelope - multiple variances required to construct residence - major portions of property consist of wetlands. Lakeshore Undeveloped. Hot assessed for sewer and water. Hever asseesed as buildabl. lot based on market valuation. ). ♦. « In additioDr staff has reviewed the assessed Ptu«.ket valuations for all seven parcels, they have been listed for your consideration belowi » 8 IParoel •88 •87 •86 •85 •84 •83 •82 •81 •80 •19 •78 1 . 0003 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 550.00 500.00 440.00 360.00 330.00 300.00 0009 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 100.00 60.00 40.00 30.00 50.00 > • *0010 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 30.00 - 0011 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 40.CO 30.00 50.00 • 0012 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 50.00 40.00 40.00 • % 0013 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 100.00 60.00 40.00 30.00 50.00 0014 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 270.00 250.00 140.00 100.00 80.00 70.00 r y. tr' ■4 & The parcels have never been assessed as buildable lots. Parcel 0003 has been assessed for lateral sewer and a water unit, but the subject parcels have never been assessed for sewer or water (0013 and 0014). Staff RecoHBcndation To recommend denial of the lot area variance application of Merritt Peterson and Riclc Stodola based on the following findingst 1. There is only approximately 5,500 s.f. of area within the defined building envelope with an average approximate depth of 100*. 2. There is not an adaquate area to build a house and meet the 75* setbac)c requirement, the front, rear and side yard setbacks and hardcover regulations. 3. The property has never been assessed for sewer or water. 4. The property has been valuated for tax purposes in the past at a reduced amount to reflect the fact that these are substandard lots and not appropriate for residential construction. 5. The lot is subject to flooding and is in the natural drainageway to the lake for the surrounding watershed. There is no way to build on the property without diverting the surface water run-off in a manner contrary to the normal run-off pattern and onto the adjacent street. Any construction would be subject to periodic flooding. I ■^r v: e f 1s .r- - .,v ■ •> <■ i . *; X \ ■ ‘ f, V / A •:i . ^ Ji > « Zoning File #1296 Page 4 of 6 Ae b. c. d. e. f. Traffic congestion Surface water drainage problems Surface water pollution problems for Lake Minnetonka Congestion in the area Dioninition in value to the surrounding properties Parking problems in the area 8. The applicant has failed to demonstrate any hardships to warrant the granting of a variance which granting of variances would be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Orono. 9. The granting of the requested variances would be adverse to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Code of the City. Once again, the lot area request for buildability was never the intent or purpose of the applicants. It was clearly the procedure to go through so that a reasonable use of the property can be decided when the property is formally deemed unbuildable. The accessory dock is located on a limited use channel and surrounded by large wetland/swamp areas. The only safe parking area available is the driveway on the parcel referred to as 0003 where Mr. Tillotsen's driveway has been constructed. The parking on the county right-of-way would not be allowed and the City would not encourage a curb cut within this section of roadway• Staff can recall other applications that dealt with the creation of lots for exclusive riparian use. Briefly to review: In 1985 the Marina Committee was kept busy working on the 10* by 20* riparian lots along the narrows to the south end of the City. In this case, the riparian tracts were created years before for the purpose of keeping the adjacent residence lot off the main lake and away from the narrow channel area by providing a protected harbor for the docking of boats. When the covenants expired, some of the owners sold off the lots to other members of the public who did not necessarily reside in the City of Orono. These docks have existed for years and the recent variance and Conditional Use Permit applications were a means of setting up guidelines for the use of the severely limited dock areas. In recent years, in the Stubbs Bay area, staff can recall a subdivision (Balgaard/Norton) where the owner of a riparain tract separated from his hoBiestead lot by the county road was allowed to divide off a 200* ^trip to provide riparian access for this next door neighbor, Mr. Balgaard. The only structures allowed on these lots were the accessory docks. The approval was based on the fact that Mr. Balgaard was immediately, adjacent to the property on the opposite side of the roadway. In the subdivision that created three residential lots of the old Stubbs Bay Marina property, the City approved substandard lots with less than the required 2 acres in area in addition to a riparian tract. The riparian outlet was limited to the future ownership of someone within a 1000' radius of the subject property. It just so happens that the neighbor across the ■<> '' 5-' 1 < . *■ t .. / r \ ^ * * * ■ i : ? 1 ^ f i / * Vv ( 1 . ■i ’ i ; 1 "1 rr ri m- *■. . i • I * • • * 1- ■ "■: yt ; \ I "Jay ,>■■- • % '•T*^4 I f t • I :r i-l* Zoning File #1296 Page 5 of 6 B^ree^ from ^he ouflof purchased it and continues to owns the property now. Once again* the background and reason behind this subdivision was the owner was giving up a cosonercial marina and the City granted certain variances for residential use with the rezoning so that there would be no serious challenge of a taking. There have been subdivisions in the past* specifically the Greentrees and the Pink Palace Subdivisions where reparian tracts were created for the exclusive use of adjacent lot because of extensive lineal feet of shoreline that easily satisfied the required lot width of the specific zoning district. The RS district (island districts) the ordinances of the City allow for accessory docks without principal structures. This would be a reasonable use in consideration of the uniqueness of island properties and the intent of the City to minimize development. In the Heintz application noted above where the City denied Mr. Heints the lot area variance for building. Heintz was told he couldn't construct an accessory dock and that the property was merely limited to picnic* tenting* possible fire place for picnicking and that a boat could be pulled up on the side of the shoreline* but not permanently stored on the property. The new mezibers of the Planning Commission should be advised that the City does not allow an accessory dock to be constructed a lot being developed until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the nsw residence. The reason for this is that someone is at home to supervise and protect the dock property. Docks* boats and boat equipment are always being burglarized. As with all accessory structures/uses* it is the resident of the principal structure that is there to watch out for their personal property. Prior to approving any use of these parcels* Mr. Guitafson should be asked as to how he is planning to dispose of the other tracts within this RLS. The applicants advised that Mr. Tillotsen has spoken for 0003* but what of 9* 10* 11 and 12. Review your wetlands map. They are all located within a wetlands area* except for 0003 and Tract G. Tract 0009 through 0014 should be legally combined as one parcel* depending upon the resolve of this issue* possibly for future acquisition by Mr. Tillotsen. Issues for considerationt 1. Does the physical character of the area have any bearing on your consideration - limited channel area* dock screened by natural vegetation. Tillotsen has a dock on Tract F* the same as applicants'* is a shared dock more appropriate? 2. The City has approved the creation and use of riparian tracts where future owners live within a reasonable policing radius of the dock area. The applicants live in other cities. How does the Planning Commission feel on this issue? It is important on a limited channel area where the dock is shielded by natural vegetation and within visual scope of neighbor Tillotsen? How permanent? T > ; ■ V./" !■ /. H U. r,’ r* .1 " . 1 * 1 Wjf <r lia / • ' ril \ '■ ' *31'. 0"i<{% c Lilin \l«J \•1 if 1 !>■ /i Zoning File #1296 Page 6 of 6 Alternative® for Planning Coniasion Action JSrSSll! •WlAcwta^ind^'^p^^^ «uet "AgVl "y *\i OOOa!**^* Guetafaon auat also provide legal access to the dock area via 3. ^oek limited to two slips only - it should be added that this 4* Ho parking shall be allowed on the county road* 5. No other structures can be installed on the property. on the^proper^.*^**^^^**^ gravel or blacktop can be installed If denied« the following conditions should be considered! 1.Imedlate removal of the dock. Applicant can use the subject property for picnic purposes, mooring of a boat on the shoreline, but not kept there permanently. site must be via parcel 003. Gustafson, the current owner, must provide access easement for applicants. Commission wish to address the fact that Mr. Tillots^^ a Tr«ti%r C. D «d S? '• «“•*=•*•<>» “.v. tot f . X'.4 . I 1* ^ r I I VI nxp ic^'-nio cin or ORONO - variamcb applicaticni /f Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional va Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original applica After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) r) >tL'X ^ &>■1 raomrf uxKnm | ^ ^ Site Address /Q jSf Ao^ar / 1 ^ R.c^ A^tOGt£A)0 ia ■ Property Identification Nunber (P.I.D.) /7^V OO/^ 1/Please check one - Property _____ abstract or X torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICAIT ? PlffiSsoU" CITY OF ORDNQ FimCE OFFICE A fV<.VVWV 01 Cf.V CHECK JL 150.00 k£CEIPT-JHm YOU H039990 cool ROl T15:l 05/26/8i Phone (home ) 47^5 _________ Phone (work) 6i90 Address: iiJ€^ UiUi Kei City : A/iaM^^hKA Zip: Srr2<Y 5 Name --------- £SfoOolA /Zyfl^r Zaa»V//oGS \ (if different than applicant) Name ^AiTUL-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: ^“70^ ^tL\j^JcWiJl^d4L tCi.tyt ZiptS^^^^ Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also o«m the adjacent parcels of land. PSBSBRT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District _j Present Use of Property OA 6j L^ 'Ath^L Residential Other (specify) DBSGRIPTZOH OF RBQOBST Estimated Construction Cost $ /oo O Describe request in detailHi Co^sHluct Onc,/C, VARIABCBS RBQOIRBD r*\». •*•i . Lot Area Lot Width % % 1 1Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear) Other Aj-Mr^i4y /o Y2oa/ SjHucf’ £qjo/ Poc.^ gju 4/oaJ ttfe tvv. h* iK <* 9 Ai I ? i' #•« K .4 % i ♦t 1 4 ♦ i } f-. 1 4'm <■> , V; •» 'G- nr ir •V f i «> I « Jk . i 1 . ’ * 1 ' * l ' ‘ 'r y - ■m 4 t i \ #1 V> ii :;;i » 4 ,t •'? i if 1 -J 1..I JtDSBIP Describe undue hardship or practical diff enforc^ent .of zoning regulations tlPTIOH OP UMDSIIAL PRO! '44eZiejlP COHDITIOHS Describe unusual property conditions oreventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: Jiah _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. 3. RBQOUIBD SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners* List of o«mers within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 <k>vt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons yqu wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. ' 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is c Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date lete. APPLICABT'S SIGBATDRB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator,, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the ^Information supplied is true and^^qrrect to the best of his/her Applicant's SignatureDate OifHBRS SIGBATOBB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto'.the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this jMouest. owner'6 Slgnature/^y^B^ '______________Date Applicant must have Vail submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning p». «ip'—■ 8 t-y J|' V i*T" r \ ( • ■ • - u- I. ‘■rr •■*;'■■r I ’ t’ ' ' "K ‘'fi / . • ft ' ♦ ' r 1 ;!i3 5?i°fil > 30 § 3 > Oo 30 3 30 s t oo *i«^ Mi ajs"" ^;5rS O 30 > O O 3 S ^ X X O M^ ^ ^ 5 > S o o VilSiil OI S:«•« o f>» Ui iis5|« S««5-‘5 J6c_ii- 01 Ss r fO 01 9 fO 3S 01 P> 3C •- r- f- o 04 ► ^ f- f- ^ 5 r< ^ o O ^N fo :< K m > _ o o M *« 0) Q Xj I 35§§3q ii6* 804 _ S3 M M §3 lO 04 m M fO 01 ni > w > m 2 6 i a* ssssss N O M M ^> o o o on ii2285m m > I O M 8^3 fO 3S gsasssO o Z 9 « S S S M S 8 :< 04 O Q ^ H M m m >Xnn I M M O lO 0« 01 aa OJ »<o o to 3S lO 3 5 2 *«m > s ^ o 2 6 i’S o 3^00 M x4 O O 10^-0 lO m f»i m S m ra ill *Pii I Nl I fO 04 8-83 01 Sf o oi ^ • s6 8 V !=P3le:: 8 x4 Iro 04 *-3 fO 3S C» 55|<28 iar*- SOU 5 28:33' 8 Oi M o ro II __ -4 z >5 X 3 u ni trr«i > 30 S3*® O 30 O xj I X| I fO Oi 8 im 'Tl_ rum Z ra m Jii^siS r- o 01 xj I Xj IM 04 8“ SS 10 3 ^ rri *D ni > -O \ •< > ► m 2 O O 30 > Oo S s 30 ni 01 U 30 30 O »-• 388o!:i*^M ^ m ^ S«55«“5 — ^ i ^ 2 O Q ^ >01 m 01 30 m 2 f CX H > ni 2 Im iS8 04 m o ^ Oi 01 £ gS?*2«-< ^ 55 > Ps;**a5 ii--8= S§i2ggi- S3S^*" 5S3* n 04 30 o x| I rro 01 iSii I i s s o > Htn p 8.5 a t £ ■ »• Jt % w' ,v • V-1t ■ -«ij . «%i > I 1 :^:?Lrr 1: ■'.^:. v'-'iiai W.'' . > -‘•y;V •>?'>v »>♦ '•• Vv 1' U' .: V- .v-V-r • f •5 . V - J#f / ♦ ^ • ! . •I 1 1 I ■V • u V r • ?s eo H ni t ami fis 38 1 I - y ► ^ '» f " . r // .' 1. i i I - » d f • « r< <» • i-i ♦ *i I d li . :.r *♦ ■ 4 r f • >r'f > f>« .d•n I r. CITV OF oaoNo GITYof ORONO Port Offiot B<n 66*CiyM«l Bay. Minnaaota 56323•M«iiiei|ial On the North Shore o/ Lake Minnetonka May 24, 1988 Coffaa Landings C/0 Narritt Petarson 4722 Mast Parhills Road Mlnnatonka, MN 55345 ioc.t.d .t Daar Mr. Paterson t On May 20, 1988 I mat with A1 Michaels, attorney racraBen^ina at^*thf Coffaa Landings, regarding the*^ violation located at 1895 Shadywood Road. At that ?®.^twith Mr. Michaels the necessary administrative steps that must be taken in order for the City to ecoimended that a lot area variance application be filed in order to determine if the lot was a buildable lot The cit^v of f^hority to d... . lot u^buIld.biV ^ advise that you file a variance application Uii** ao that appropriate and legal determinations can bemade regarding the future use of the property. ®®“ *>® that day also touchad iv nn n^HAr- s..«'ru"nb:iM.'bj” "?*.‘dj?;id" t^%t'?• “hVt it%is5d”s:SdTCVbV;tt “/ty!- -•>« turcis s: tSJ if.'y S*S?b d.."^l’Lt‘"fc\"*^hrr/ioV%f •of “*’lb“'SStr IridaVf /rjy°f7??98V. application by The application for a variance has been enclosed for vour convenience. The cost for such an application is $150 00 Staff would be happy to review the application process with you. application is filled by May 27th. the sublect property " nV"o.“:‘“ b^uildSilllty“"til Council has the property 1»»,■ s »"?■ ^ if > (j;V-. w * » r V*’ ■t l! -i i- ■■ I iLi B .1 m «Kr» Please contact ay office if you have any further questions regardinq the natters discussed above. Sincerely» Jeanne A. Nabusthf Building a Zoning Adninlstrator Mark Bemhardson, City Adninistrator Thosias J. Jacobsr Building a Fire Inspector Michael P. Gaffron# Assistant Zoning Adninistrator Ton Barrettr City Attorney Rick Stodola A1 Michaels Enclosures Variance Application JAM/lh • > 11-1 i 'i. • *• .i -S4- -Ut-.r t /" I • "11.» * ♦ ♦ '» ' t I iiwi «* r .‘ * 5f mF-%' C-1 • ■^^"**** .' is {♦ I» If « < > 5 , I > . A jr \ «r I • • • 1 % • «» ’A ’ I» • *. ‘jr^ \ • 4 ^ A • >' i/1 I ' •*4 ' / :■ • •r ^.'t ^ ♦ II » I f •'! oo-n CD pao 32 COm 50cn I Oi CO o o 3 O" fO 30n> to o ro Ul tn s^fS^s-a- flllf i II |l!t 5|- *istsJsfsi &5tf5-g.8g-* 8's |w5 sis’ll w i^S. 1 Ufa iJfrititfKII? flfS?- ?> rlt UlUl S-„Sh jr; Jilif S^s.^^rt .*r09n^J tP us«; s * iiOf? e*rt^• ►lb g*'<«8^ ea c. * rrB^2f2 a n osn j-* u M_rt»nApin o5'&^ jpoo'’^ « S’<#r»_rt X*T)^QQ ??s.5&g^g.So ►1 r- m o 0 3 0 3 lO -♦> IQ •— -h 3 ►- r— O) 3 01 ri)-n eo O in • o 2^3 •— Q. 3 3 cr 3 (/I (D —f| ^ ►—• VI *-* K 5 «o o ' *g c o o - i-» m 1 <1 ¥; • f* d ^ I t, * 3 3 3 0“! II I i* i V .5 a -ii I f* /mJi ; ,, ♦ i ■ t \ or 1^" ti- .^r *».1^ SS ( 0 f < _®i__i_ 1 1 f, ^ i '■ ^ » .' M ifSl '4*i 1 •'H: ■ -%■ . V tw "' .-M \•. • • .* i' •' «-r X •V I ■'.' f-.- m4>! u n ' ' ) .? '1 ■i, .. ♦?' . s ^O ::4* yz*f*s **'A**^ s 4 ^ ■ •• It r7Qm«i 1 ;’•. ■• >• €:.." :•< V- .' ■ > •' VT .•"r.;W'* A* • v «* C>l Wai S'V nt.:‘■ .'!r:3 % 0/. /r jP •* I <V/ ^<^U9 k ’ '\fr. ^IV ■ • V. . •> W‘ I ' . T » .<4.M N •.y <'0 .. 'V,- V «• ^ vf*„\j • ' / i‘^ Tir 4 > > 1./ / » r% 0 * •^ ‘•r ‘' 4 - /I I » « '1 .•9 >{ n - /f m ■ • >. ; •} ./ ^ '' . ■ ii. lL —at«^ .#• •%Ctftific«tt of $«rf«f #«r tfilttr M. ^«a^ru« JUcfc i, ijUnr #tri MtMIt^la COMftlf. HlllAtMlA / / Ottl^lNA L Paomsau o** a««X7* ^ * ImtrUm hm9tmmdm»9 i?‘:jJVt^'r:ii.*;ii:‘iK *•".*>•••• •rapoiti UcttUa tf * O irtpoMd fttvit, Mraat. Aiitf ^rivtvtf. If ngg ftffioft to tflOV «flf ttlltf l■0fDwt•§llt| 0f kTOi r: VC*v coma t ueutM. lac. •f>• (* . . •> •. tefflu lie, 1044 CffflMtrt iM liMi SurtCfOft U«f life#. HlMi«|0ta y\^ Jejit: I iRcft • 10 f»«t OiU : S«ott«Otr 20, 1f0» ^ lr»M MrOtr •'.3 #983 1 ...\ %h V r* > ^ . r.r .V .1 ■A ■"V,I 1 *>1llrL I» > f-' 4 i: V f • .• ! .#• 0> i ( % \ i I K Iv i- ^4 *'X / ■0 m' sani i -> fot > { t- V -v Ikt I itmt Planning COMlsslon Chalrnan Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bemhardson Tom Jacobsr Building & Pire Inspector June 14» 1988 Subjects #1297 Washington Scientific - 2605 Ways »a Boulevard - Comswrcial Site Plan Review List of BXhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D -> Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G • Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - J4>plication Property Owners List Plat Map Motice of Public Hearing Survey letter Prom Vogt Corp., Architect Dated €-3*88 Proposed site Plan, Landscape Plan & Drainage Plam City Engineer Report With Plan West Elevation Worth Elevation - Details Applicant is proposing to construct a 175* x 187* (32725 s.f.) PertiueiitCode Sections Section 10*50 Industrial District Section 10.60 Preformance Standards Section 10.61 Special Provisions In reviewing the proposal, staff has made the following findings.1. Zoning District - I ^AjflcA^ion, storage and manufacturing, this is an approved use within this zone. 3. Areas 1,151,567.3 s.f. or 26.44 acres minimum required is 2 acres. 4. Accesst Is existing, out to State Highway 12 5. Parkings See exhibit 6 Retired s 4 spaces + 1 per 800 s.f, floor spaces. Existing building - 139,000 s.f. f 800 - 174. Addition - 32,725 s.f. f 800 - 41 Total Parking Required Existing - 174 Addition - 41 Minimum » 4 Required 5TF spaces of the**code*”^ **** provided 328 parking spaces which meet the requirements Jini '4.■t * * ’ t ' ' *: h ■ ^1*» - ; r ** * ^ i ii r'lflMii ’ :i- n • X • - ‘?. * Bandicapped Parking Stalin 1 apace per 560 stalls 320 f 50 - 6.56 or 7 Applicant nust nake spaces with approved signs. Drainage - The City Engineer has reviewed the plans submitted Exhibit H, The City Engineer feels the plan is acceptable with the modification that drainage should be directed to the swale as shown on plan. Bnilding Plans - (Exhibit I 6 J) Staff has reviewed the plans and found that the material use will blend into the existing building. Also submitted Exhibit F is a letter from the Architect which states that the structure is under the 30* maximiun height and will be consistant with the Orono Codes. Signage - Existing - meets requirements of Code - No change Fire Code kevlew - In the review by the City Engineer he has stated that a hydrant be provided in the south west corner with an access road. Since the applicant has provided a fire suppression system within the last 2 years, it is staffs recommendation that the sprinkler system will provide adequate titm protection. Sprinkler systems are considered an acceptable alternative to hydrant and access. Fire lanes should be maintained at loading docks and along the front of the structure. SAC Unit Charge - This charge will require that applicant complete form MtfCC 86B and get Metro Waste Commission approval before a building permit is issued. Lamdseaping Plan - Applicant is proposing to continue tree planting in the front of the structure with fruit trees (Exhibit 6). Staff Beoomswndatlon Staff recommends approval of the Commercial Site Plan based on the following: 1. The propose structure/addition and operation is not determents1 to the public health, saftey and welfare, or materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 2. Proposed structure and use meets Opono Municipal and Boning Code requirements. 3. Drainage is directed to swale as recommended by City Engineer. 4. That applicant completes Metro Waste Commission addition form 86B to determine SAC units. IK -4 u I ^ * *r F?' m ' 4 1 1 W '.M , /‘.L ‘*4. , ^ • -... 1-.^.^97 CITY. OF OROMO - GENERAL LA^^E Aljj^ICAttpIt PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 2605 West Wayaata Boulevard_________ 38 33-118-23 130009 Property Identification Niinber (P.I.D.) 38 33-118-23 130010 iin [f CROW firarce office Please check one - Property (for Conditional Use Applications only) 38 33-118-23 130001 U:,L>i‘00000 S abstract or_______torrens? 01 CEfI 150.00 Chm TL 150.00 htCtlFT-WA^K you Please attach legal description to application if not includaidP?i? C601 ROl 7^*5^ on required survey. 05/27/80 APPLICANT Nane Joseph Pallansch Phone (home) 286-2448 Phone (work) 473-1271 Address 2605 West Wayzata Blvd ONNBR (if different than applicant) Name H It > I'in (Ly City Long Lake Imm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm < Phone (home) Phone Zip 55356 Address /P£'CS LO. L0/K\{'? u"(^ City p , C • ^*10roperty Acquired note than 10 years Zip ^ b 5S(p (month/year) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PEES - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS “ Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After**the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee i \ 8100.00 $150.00 $150.00 Residential accessory Use Institutional (church, school# etc.) Duplex Credit/Bldg $200.00 f) Land Alteration i Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading# seawall# retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Et AP^CATIOHS i(x $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (<f consultant fees) ________ $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation .. f' i4V- r >• 7^' 1 I >i #' ' PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Light industrial Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPnrN OP RBQOBST Describe request in detail: Review site plan of similar construction for Increase of manufacturing area with_ _ _ _ _ 3.* fIRBD SUBMITTRLS Completed Application Porm. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-*603 Government Center 348*3271) Stamped, legal sised envelopes (#10) pre*addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGHATGRB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true an^correct to the best of ^his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature 2 vJUl D.t. s'/A'i/yp ONNBRS SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled .mMMi i ■i ^ '.'C- * .'PfW*’' ;,v .T* ■ .. -v:V ; ummmm ^ .mmm • -vv* y ?8 1% > M es |s s ^8 M O yi u §s K1 m s o 2 m M « H M yi<Sf £ lit •lO M HKS S •« •yA !SSs§ S|$$ lU ^ Ooe y* tti 1*1 11 li S gg|l . -7^/. :■••.■• -'J* ■V ■■ .■■.:V:- ..V 1 4 ^-0 A-'- ftj >'^ •f'Cm-' t f V - ;.' \ // CZTT or OM»0 MVZCB • The^Planning Commission will hold Public Hearings in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday* June 20* 1988 at 7*00 P.M. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications #1289 for a proposed 3 lot residential subdivision of property located at 115 Old Crystal Bay Road. 1. #1290 James A. Lorence of 4460 Horth Shore Drive seeks hardcover and setback variances and a conditional use permit for landscape improvements and construction of lakeside deck. 2. 11291 Alfred Iverson of 2835 Casco Point Road seeks a hardcover variance to construct of garage addition. 3. #1292 Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District at 2865 Horth Shore Drive has filed a renewal conditional use permit for an improvement plan previously approved by the City that would allow construction of a new park building and certain landscape improvements. 4. #1293 Grace Baptist Church at 2380 Shadywood Road have filed a conditional use permit for expansion of the parking lot area. 5. #1295 John McDowell representing the property located at 165 Turnham Road* seeks a lot area variance to construct a new residence on a lot that does not meet the five acre area standard for the soning district. 6. #1296 Merritt J. Peterson and Rick Stodola seek an area variance to determine the buildability of the property located at 1895 Shadywood Road. 7. #1297 Washington Scientific at 2605 West Waysata Boulvard has filed a commercial site plan application for the public review of a major addition to the north west side of the existing structure. 8. #1298 Richard J. Johnson of 1304 Elmwood Avenue has filed a vacation application for the remaining dedicated portions of Forest Boulvard as dedicated in the plat of Saga Hill Revised* Hennepin County* Minnesota. This unimproved dedicated roadway can be found along the south east shoreline of Forest Lake within the City of Orono. 9. #1299 Nancy Higgins of 3017 North Shore Drive seeks a conditional use permit for an existing summer guest cabin and caretakers residence so that the existing principal residence can be rased and a new residence constructed on the property. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices. City of Orono By: Planning Commission r ,4 . \‘ * if* '! ’ *1 Si 1::'r*’ V % I*' ■■ *1 -^■.. ** t r * . \ * t ■f,^V THE VOOT CORPORATION ARCHITBCTURB ■NOINBBRINO Juna 3t 1988 Tom Jacobs Building Inspector City of Orono P»0*Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN. 55323 Re: Proposed Addition to Washington Scientific Industries Dear Tom: We are writing with regard to the additional Information you requested concerning the height and exterior appearance characteristics of the proposed Washington Scientific addition. The height of the existing building Is 16 feet. The new addition will be approx. 23 feet high (Including the parapet height). Since Highway 12 rises west of the site we feel this additional height will be a benefit by avoiding an eye-level view of the roof. The materials proposed for the exterior walls will comply with Orono requirements (brick, decorative block or equivalent quality facia panels) and the materials and color will be selected to blend with the existing plant for a unified look. Yours truly. THE VOGT CORPORATION 'y: Edward J. Vogt. A.I.A. EJV/jp cc: J. Pallansch 1 • f r ' / I ^ .i' I’ , » / « • Bonestroo “ sene WW Anderlik & |\J| Associates fnginttn A Archfttct^ Ono G. 9on ma. f.E. Mfft w. iotfne. EC. JOMph C. AnSHMi. PC. ■ratford A. Uwifctfs. PX Mcfiavd C. Aimtr. Pi. Jam c Olwn. PC. GItvwi i. Cpek. PC. TfiONiai C. Viyw PC. •obm a Schumdic. PJ. Mwvm L loneia. PX MMh A. GorSoa PC. Cichavd w Poetr. PC. Oov>aid C. ■mgaidi. PC. Jtrry A. Courdon. PC. aaarfe A. Naraon. PC. M K. PM. PA Mfchati T. Caimwann, PC. ipbtft i. PMM. PC. OaMd a IjodMa. PC. Thomai W. Nttnoa PC. MlcPaai C. lyncP. PC. Jam C. Maiand. PC ifii»inaei P Andtfion. PC. HMh A. Cactimann. PJ. Marti C. Soffv PC. ■abtft C. 9uamk. A.I.A. Tfioaiai e Angm, PC. mpwM a. SanPofd. PC. Oiartn A. Crtdaon Lao M. Pwaaiilry Smart M. Cdtrtfrt Mark A. Sdp Jusi« 2. 19M City of Orono Box 66 Cryttxl Boy, MM 59323 » I Attnt Mr* Toa Jacobs 1 lot Filo Mo. 139 - Voihington Sciontlflc Door Toa, Vo hovo rovlovod tho building plan otqtontion tubaittod by Voohington Scion- tifie. Tho plan it accoptablo with tho following aodificationt. Tho oito drainago should bo dlroctod to a svalo at shown on tho attachod drawing. Tho addition of a firo hydrant noar tho southwost comer would bo dosirablo. Tho construction of a 20* accost road with a turn around to tho hydrant would bo nocossary. If you hawo any questions, please contact this office. Yours wory truly, BOMESTIOO, lOSEME, AMDEILIX ( ASSOCIATES. INC. Glenn 1. Cook GRCtli t" End.■-‘V ' - S' <■- ♦,* I - • V* 4- \ i ’I I !/ . ? >. ^ K 1 v> ^ . , I * . r t. 9 *^'h r ^ ‘ ^ 1*. ^ •. r. * ‘ / ♦ < ’ i» 1/ \ * i * r H- i•f ^ • /; ‘ • .r« i i Tot ■ ■. ■ ' " 4# 0 !» - d I 'i s i •» I ^ } > V? \i fl ■. ^ ..' * /'• ^ i f >v -4 ! ! I* # 4- I *■ ' ' ;] ll«t«t Planning Coniasion Chaiman Kelley Orono Planning Conmiaaion llead>era City Adadniatrator Bernhardaon Toai Jacobs, Building & Fire Znapecter June 16, 19S8 Bubjawtt #1297 flaahington Scientific - 2605 Ifaysata Boulevard Applicant haa provided ataff with a letter (attached) requeating they be allowed to atock pile aoil, on property until they receive proper approvala. Staff haa reviewed the letter and due to the poor aoil found in the aoil exploration, of the addition and the propoaed location of the fill, ataff recoaaenda approval with the condition that it be removed from the aite if applicant doea not get approval of the Conditional Dae Permit for filling and grading. j •V m % ▼ •s' f. -i i • I I « f, / ^ ) i ^ j r m- ■TJ' * : Jir * 4 4 * > *■ I ' ' 1 I ?» / > ■• ♦ I ‘ THE VOOT CORPORATION ARCMITBCTURK ■NOINBBRINO June 15, 1988 Tom Jacobs, Bldg. Inspector City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, NN 55323 Re: Washington Scientific Industries Proposed Building Addition Dear Mr* Jacobs: Due to poor soil underlying the proposed building addition, it will be advisable to excavate and replace soil to a depth of approximately 7' below the floor. This will result in an excess of approximately 10,000 cu. yards of fill to be disposed of. Along the south 1200 feet of the west property line there is now a rather abrupt slope where the grade drops down about 6' in a short horizontal distance. This appears to us to be a logical location to place the excess fill. The abrupt bank could be made into a more gentle slope and would improve the drainage in the rear portion of the site, which is now poorly drained. Since you pointed out that this would require a conditional use permit, we would like the City to know that WSI intends to apply for a conditional use permit to do this grading. Prior to approval of a conditional use permit the excavated earth would be stockpiled at a location determined and approved by City staff and the City Engineering Consultant. The extra earth could be removed from the site entirely, but we believe that regrading the west edge of the rear area of the site to a more gentle slope would be a good solution and would result in improved drainage conditions. Yours truly. THE VOGT CORPORATION Edward J. Vogt, A.I.A. EJV/dj cc: J.. Pallansch, WSI JUNISIWWW «. t: f 9 4 ^ r ■ '/ 1 * ' t V'-- . * h.% ^ ~ I ' »•» ^ > ^ * /6. TOs VATEt Planning Connisaion Chairman Kelley Planning Conmission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Nabusth* Building t> Zoning Administrator June 15f 1988 SUBJBCTt #1298 Richard J. Johnson, Vacation of Portions of Forest Boulevard - Public Bearing pERranoR oRDzmacB Section 10.12 vacation of streets, alley and public grounds. Vacation of remaining portions of Forest Boulevard yet to be vacated. Original partial vacation approved by Council on March 28, 1988. LIST or SniBITSt Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Oimers List Exhibit C - Plat Nap - Property Oimers Seeking Current Vacati( Exhibit D - Legal Description of Properties to be Vacated Exhibit E - Council Minutes of March 28, 1988 Exhibit F - Nelson Letter of March 10, 1988 Exhibit 6 - Staff Memo 3-14-88 RBVIBN OP APPLZCATZOM Mr. Johnson has assumed the roll of Audrey Schults in this current vacation application of the remaining portions of Forest Boulevard. All of the remaining 10 properties that were not included in the original application are now included in the current application. The total vacation of Forest Boulevard is now realised. At the March 28, 1988 Council meeting the staff was directed to work with the remaining property owners in order to complete the lotal vacation of Forest Boulevard. Once again, the staff can cite the following findings to support the current vacation application. 1. The steep topography and location of the i^horeline of Forest Lake within the platted right-of-way would prohibit road construction. 2. There are no existing utilities within the subject area nor are any utilities planned within this area of the dedicated roadway. 3. There are no drainageways or protected wetlands within the subject area. 4. This area of Forest Boulevard serve no current public purpose and no future public purpose or need. 5. The Orono Council in March of 1988 directed the Orono Staff to work with the remaining property owners so that a complete vacation of Forest Boulevard could be realized. The Planning Commission may remember the letter from Mr. Nelson (Exhibit F), submitted in the original application that advised of his opposition to the vacation in front of his or Mr. Johnson's property (Lot 1, 2, 6 3, Block 6, Saga Rill Revised). As his letter advised when the 1 /.-m •f - j m ... /' & ' .Vs;. W/v #W- * a*s 4 . \' a ( • li 1r . .' ivv ■ f ' % V? >.4 r ** ' .. V -»' V./'- - / 'i / Zoning File il298i Page 2 of 2 via private easenenta to his current residence. He reminds us that the existing driveway intersects four private properties. Review the sketch at the bottom of the Nelson letter (Exhibit F). Staff has agreed that they will work with the four individual property owners to obtain the neecessary access easesient for Mr. Nelson before the vacation of Lot 1» 2, k 3* Block € Saga Rill Revised are finalised. Since the City was remiss in not obtaining the original easements at the time of the vacation of Oak Place# the City will draft the appropriate legal descriptions for access easements. Mr. Johnson had advised originally that he would be happy to grant the total access easement through his portion of vacated Oak Place but Mr. Nelson advised that because of topography and existing road bed that it would be impossible to squire an easement only through Mr. Johnson's property. Staff would ask that you condition your approval of the current vacation application based on the final resolve of access easements to the Nelson property via vacated Oak Place. Staff sees no problem with approving the final vacation of Forest Boulevard for the remaining eight property owners. I' i '' -»■ ^. .-Tp:-,' • S-: ■m I- !?'■ m ;V' p, i f r - 1 1 ‘T-1 V •«■ **» i ■ I . % ft- CITY OP OROMO - CEHBRAL LMO) DSB •• •» •» «» «• «• AM «» « PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address C:"^ J pVr^J^ “^Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ' torrens?Please check one - Property abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only) --------- Please Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name J• "JoA. n ^4 Phone (home) _Phone (work) y7e^^ ^970 ^<X *- -- • >' ‘ _ _Mdres. Z.(/>. uj o ^ 4^A city /yloCKA^i tip ^rjC»V OHUER (if different than applicant) Phone (hone) Name s***I « Phone Address City Zip nr n PEES - CONDITIONAL USB PBRNITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee O.W Ijy200i00 $100.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) $200.00 f) 01 CEV 250.00 ChtCK TL 250.00 RECEIh T-f HAm YOU ft090090 cm ROl Ti0:5i Institutional (church, school, etc.) 05/27/8$ Residential accessory Use Duplex Credit/Bldg Commercial/Industrial Use Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTB APPLICATIONS E '* consultant fees) _ $150.00 Easement Vacation _ $ 30.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _ $250.00 Rezonlng _ $100.00 Appeals f * y. V .J ■V' •■Jf V ■f'* f% V.i4 ' %■ ' • I ^ I- ■. r k-.. '^‘r ^:i- ' V -1: ■'S? t • i-. r* ». f'r.r* « 1rN PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) UlSCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: 2. 3. REQUIRED 8UBNITTRLS 1. Completed Application Porm. Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government ^©nu0JT 34o*3271) Stam^d7^1egaT* sised envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan» if applicable (see staff for requirements).Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please ittach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The applicant and Property Owner imat sign this appliV^tioiir* Vlease remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICAHT'S SIGNATURE agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or ^usual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that knwledge^”*^^°” supplie^.^s trueand correct to the best of his/her Applicant's signature pate OWNERS SIGNATURE acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the p.roperty by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, dnd Council members for purposes of investigation and verjf*^Lcation of'^^MidTs'^eciueste Owner 's signature Applleant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, if an applicant is r5 : , 4 .t • ♦ * v;i * ■ \\ > 4. < ' k V T * ] m .•V ■S :<!■. < '• :\ ' » * r •‘ JKT^ fj-. 5 3 O Tl gss |HI| "J h S X fn s XM m i« o f sa^ssg 3SSI 1 Ui8 SSSsS mis r uv ^3!iS?m ¥ ill: m ^H < o > m e f m s 5 *iMis ^ 9 il e ^ m m 8 iS ps pii» #• m i* »s Sf "S Ml Mln m_ •» m > m 5 T n 2 m Mi rs 3 8 Si§ S'-'-SS iSxS 3! > 90 m ^ 8 Im Mi Ml sSI=« *i|§5? S*5:as * s?5:d 8« 5|is» Ml I- I- O iii?a s C! m H m H! 5 S 5 2 Mi Mi 3 CB QB ^ m rn ^ 5 9 :o 90 Q 0> e o90 ^ Mi Siln m ^ V -<|so 90 30 O Ml ^ M M $Ml o n Mi Z X Ml ^ g g Mi Om 90 Z ^ aiiiS 88 ^ m m m ^ c m »« Ml W Im Mi Mg iSS Mi ^ z z e M 5S z z S * Ml 5i? S z H m r- X Ml i* H S|*285|i*M si..I Ml Ml Z lirsa~ i' I'z M •S <O O *8 (if?h N~'U S*^ 3 ::i3s ;i88:; ^fUfOiOO*s«sj sigl!S r IM Mi ^ ♦ ^ S 8 SX’-S^»2 xm* r •ng::sS3liss^s: ? fS Mi Mi S|» 38" 2is; §1 T 888 1mw m Z z e8Soz3 »« 01 Q z lo IB ii m m H R S X M M Mizdd ^8 r m H Im Mi Z ^ M M S 8s Mi Z Q n ^ Mi X X « r2?l ^ t u m •- SIliiMgi J2 WMOM *S8 SS”? 2 rr m a r A z m •« mS^cS^ 8^g8|s 88S|8m Z 8 H S ez oz •Hm 0 m 1 fHs 33F ZM Mi V i ’ "-i"* ■. .<7.^ M % ‘'V: \ r r ^ ^- i * ':y.‘ :i • .. • // 1 *■ i* * ' » ■ --.,. *ii iii^ til SS^ m 5l3„S*i>* iii ^ s’ f®^ ► S' g 3 Z ^ s a* S 9Q O MMf M M •- 5Iw i«=»o ^ ^Vi sSJiiiS r*hkS» ^=1 • s® sM mm r- s r« I 1*1s5- is?*^2S o]! SjSj 5nS "!*■ f«l *•*f:ss? ||>SS s?Ii* tn (ji cj sS®Sr- m fti g ^ f| O Ml M W »» 5Iss^c ««'"5 «s •!•*1 I*S mSw >1- s s S i N 5 *ssggs i* sgiil* *iis? * i-ss « Olil Ml M M •-• Sassg r*1 ssigi..I ? in »>« m nn o Ml i|L Z iis;;!s fi 8 8 8 1 1 rr m.. *0 « ♦ # 3 $ 3 m z 6 ;o ► oS' SB SSPSK O M M M > I 8|*1 in Mls si® ®8S sgsss !|gS. lu a s8 r M m »• NZOS ;if8S8o #n s " f 111 ffi _ pii^s SeSi|£ s 11V I if S f^ IMI yf s ip 'i !► , ■ wmmti0mmmJi - ' ..j?' .. « LjiVVr .V % \ f » •- I 1 r ri'” •U5'V',.H •^.t ••r- ■-■ ii ■ »*• A\ \ r. T.U7. R.23 fokest lake ‘ (NOT mANDER£D) tveiM^NlMCr V2> <.i-' '■*/_>Cl" ORONO MOUND ■•‘T“ ItL* . . / 4 ^ ’/fl 3 W^m! V, i-'-^ /J*: I \ I' •'1 1^ M ii 5/ A \P1;^' c; -* ~ 7753^ 2f®*»«u.«(«c / r ca ’i^4 - ^U' i /K A,'*' ' ror oliQAmtnt of Co Rd Ns (f> itc 255 Me 25 a Co Hoy til* No K A 25 ^V^.■H/1 V'''-f% ^4 ■H.• > / / !*)' / / \'M'} -^i ,1. -rir* I* ¥- ^ .> f« L'-^v. •. >• IV'/l ;V' ' ♦ I ^ • ♦ %I 1 r t •A- -jfc • '•"v : '■.%c r * . 'ipS Wm-'y-'V-' \m'■': •: - f'V. m 'rwmh. . I. '* • r »i f f i if . < I 5 ’ COmN & GRONB SUnVCVINQ. CMOMCIMNa 4*a<AT GRONBEI^. INC^ y ^ WIHINO^UjlAtlNO •-) ['. ’AMMIAi£k; A^^Ie»HJC \ 1HkONO uud. MA(pir.'M»M JL .V C"/r V*y 47S-414I May 27, 1988 Proposed road vacation descriptions (continued) line running from the midpoint of the northwesterly line of Lot 5, said Block 6, to the midpoint of the southeasterly line of said Lot 5. RYAN PORTION That part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." which lies between the northwesterly extensions across it of the southwesterly line of Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." and a straight line running from the midpoint of the northwesterly line Lot 5, said Block 6» to the midpoint of the southeasterly line of said Lot 5. HOWELLS PORTION That part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." which lies between the northwesterly extensions across it of the Northeasterly line of Lot 4, Block 15, Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." and the southwesterly line of Lot 5, said Block 15. SOLBERG PORTION “Saaa^Hiii°Lvf^fi®^MoS'"®^J Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of KELLEN PORTitON vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co., Minn." which lies between the northwesterly extensions across it of the northeaisterly line of Lot 6, Block 15, “Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minn " and the southwestelrly line of Lot 7, said Block 15. tJ h-i.4 w L.V .V t .'f r L , 0w I ’ * t!I ■ ■ . J ,r • • .5t- r •. »• if* Mln-'/T" COFFIN St GRO 4««-AT LONOUUU 479^141 May 27. t988 Proposed road vacation descriptions for Richard J. Johnson et al of part of Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of "Saga Hill Revised Hennepin Co. Minn." RAGWIER PORTION Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of saga Hill Revised. Hennepin Co. Minn." which lies between the westerly extensions across it of the northerly and southerly lines of Lot 1. Block 5. "Saga Hill Revised. Hennepin Co. Minn!"^ PERKINS PORTION Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of ga Hill Revised. Hennepin Co. Minn." which lies between the f "OEtOerly indOT uox Block 5. Saga Hill Revised. Hennepin Co. Minn." BEVANS AND SCHMIDT PORTION "Saaa‘^Hni°PoII?cfJ®^u*'°'"®^- ®Ji^levard as dedicated in the plat of northerly and soSthl?ly finesof Lot 3, Block 5, Saga Hill Revised. Hennepin Co. Minn." JOHNSON PORTION "Saoa^Hiii°Lv?4fH®^u^°'"®^^ Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of HiirR^i^^d^^S it*of the^NSrthiririine''Sf^Lot*?! lllcVe ^"SaU' NELSON PORTION vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the olat of n«2?K Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." which lies between the westerfv^ffnL®^f®rnJ®5^ northeasterly and southMinn." ^ "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co FRIELER PORTION 1vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the olat of northwestftriv ovtIncV««J^ v-w. ni,m. wnicn lies Detween the m 1 o i - : mKv .4»f % mag ...m. % [- ■■ ' p- - ’' 4 ’ . i 1 .'m. 1 • yi- V >■ MINUTES OF TUB REGULAR ORONO INCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 28, 1988 •J - I#1248 IfILLIAMS COHTINI CounciliLember Goetten felt that at some point in time the City should do something about these streets. Acting Mayor Callahan agreed with CounciImember Goetten, and because of this issue felt that condition #4 in the drafted resolution pertaining to the access to the site should be omitted. CounciImembers Sime and Goetten amended their motion to omit condition #4 from the resolution. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. tl250 DAHA NULS 1397 OltOHO LANE VARIANCE RBSOLUnOH #2388 Dana Wells was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a side setback variance to construct a garage addition. It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2388 approving the variance per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. *1251 AUDREY SCHULTZ PARTIAL VACATION OP F«UE8T BOULEVARD RBSOLOnOHS *2389 - *2397 Audrey Schultz was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a partial vacation of Forest Boulevard, the remainder of Vine Place and portion of a park. Saga Hill Revised, plat. He noted that all property owners within 350' of the subject properties were notified of the application. A number of affected property owners refused to join in the application, hence the proper legal notice has been given only for the proposed portion, therefore, a total vacation of Forest Blvd. is not possible at this time. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue of access to the Nelson property and the need for an easement agreement from 3 other property owners before a total vacation of Forest Blvd. could be done. He also noted an error on the plat map that shows a portion of the park as unvacated where in fact it is actually vacated. I / * • ♦ MINUTBS OP THE REGULAR OROHO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 28, 1988 #1251 SCHULTZ CONTINUED Ms. Schultz noted that the main reason many property owners did not join in the application was their objection to paying for a survey. « Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff is going to be working with the other property owners toward a total vacation and at this point individual surveys of the properties are not necessary, but there will be a cost to the property owners involving the legal descriptions. The reason for the survey requirement for Lhe Schultz's application was to establish the ordinary high water mark along Forest Blvd. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by CounciImember Sime, to adopt the Resolutions #2389 to ^ #2397 vacating an unused portion of Forest Boulevard, an unused portion of Vine Place and a portion of a park, within the Plat of Saga Hill Revised, as proposed. And further give notification to affected residents of the intent to vacate the remaining portions of Forest Boulevard. Motion, Ayes 4, Mays 0. #1253 B. JOHN LINDAHL, JR. 1406 BOHNS POINT ROAD vaBTsmcK RESOLUTION #2398 B. John Lindahl, Jr. was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to replace an existing accessory shed and detached garage with a single detached garage with an attic area providing much needed storage. Hardcover is not an issue. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that there will be major regrading to correct the severe grade of the driveway entrance. She also noted that applicant will be granting a road and utility easement to the City over the traveled portion of the roadway known as Bohns Point Road that intersects the subject property. It was moved by CounciImember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2390 as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 8 :-v k - r r \tA ■■ ' * * itvr ' f • m,A j.. ,..■, »* ^ V' f, \ '' < ^ . I •" .;< . -♦ ' f. I # I ■ i t rJ March 10, 1988 Closing of Forest Blvd. At this time I must object to the closing of Forest Blvd because it could land-lock my property. In 1972 Orono closed Oak Place so that I am now driving on property belonging to four different property ownc?rs. This was done without notifying me. This problem must be solved before Forest Blvd can bo closed. I would like Forest Blvd closed in front uf my property when this problem is solved. / ut^ \ i I ■ y\ ■■ 1 tv . » , ■ 'A «» . r : ^ ‘if!,. L . •» V ■/ ^ V •. 1 % "' . i i • » V ^ . i 9 to: Proa: Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 14, 1988 B«h)mct, f“51^^Audrey^schult*, Vacation of Vine Place a Forest Boulevard Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.12 - Vacation of Streets. Alievs snH <^ounds. Partial vacation of Forest Boulevard, the remainder of Vine Place and portion of a park, Saga Hill Revised, plat. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Petition for Partial Vacation Legal Descriptions Engineering Report DNR Report Nelson Letter Plat Map of Area to be Vacated Wetlands Map As-Built - Sewer Survey of Vine Place/Forest Boulevard Shoreline - Location of Review of J^^iication - Section 10.12, the City has published the required two leaal notices for the proposed partial vacation of Forest Boulevard rh» fiFJ r r?‘" of^To'rMt ltMu‘*e''in*sr®ear“Fi*°* «reM,"«vi2w"Bjhlbit* * vMStiSn "res^t f “cisiic"ti:°,“i"hriu7h «id Of the defined road^bed?*°^*^*'^^^®® occupies the majority and the*wetlands*maD°lE^^ sewer lines (Exhibit K) lines within the subject ireL no wetlands or existing utility proposed ?2L?rSra'n"'d® In «ith theDNR^Bureau of i?/ telephone conversation with Jim Lawler of the application a/ ion« .J .1 no concern with the proposed area. Orono s^aff adviled within the subject there could be no new construction within^the 4 ' ‘ of 75 1 • 2'?? ‘.1 wy '' -jt'- * . • / ;* * \ * S •.,. ■ %, . .«! • %r Q Zoning Pile #1251 March 14» 1988 Page 3 of 3 3. There are no drainageways or protected wetlanda within the aubject area. purpose or need. 5. The vacation of Forest Avenue prohibits installation of Forest Boulevard as a through road. « Planning Coa»is,ion the application ijay ^ to extend on the present application, staff tSS:eS‘’p"r\‘bl«s s»*Jh\%“M^:VAVotVt«rU\“eri*ved prior%o achedulin, it before Council for final action. Mdltlonal OMOt. «>d Pluming Co—i.alon Feco—dation - 3/23/88 that Forest Blvd. no longer complete vacation, additional survey work or P%Va prohibited Trt^ :.\‘inradSn% 5?rnri'ng ‘^^!l“h«^but she soon realiied that <=here were .one that hadjn^ entering into the application and .^aIiiv her client any longer, act on the proposed •PP'-i®*'^^®"5?iId ’the other r^naining property owners «i;!nurti“t“ Slthittf" “sf tS:t ^he tot.l vacation of Forest Blvd. could be realized at some future time. Planning Conmiss.on R.connendation findings and conclusions regarding the P^°P_ . , . ipj^^ enclosed nine ?e«luUonVS?Ji‘’i *f^l/VgL"nVt the^ chain of title of each of the subject properties upon official approval of the Councxl. 1. ^ V ■■ 4 'T ^,8 t - 1 i • 8^ ;k » » ■t i ) Iy m y ^3B»' % ■|^3e- €t Zoning File 11251 March 14, 1988 Page 2 of 3 Staff has reviewed the proposed application with the City Attorney's office and asked if there was any problem with vacating portions of the unimproved right-of-way rather than asking for a total vacation. The Attorney's office advised that State Statute does not establish standards for partial or total vacations and that the City could approve the partial vacation of the applicants or indeed the total vacation of Forest Boulevard citing that it would be more efficient and create less problems in the future if the total vacation was approved by the City. In reviewing Hr. Nelson's concern (Exhibit H), clearly this current application would create no problem for Mr. Nelson. Review Exhibit I, technically, the only legal access to Nelson's property is via unimproved Forest Boulevard. At the time Oak Place was vacated, the access to Lot 3 was a private drivoway within Oak Place right-of-way. Nelson was not granted easements prior to the vacation. It is interesting to note that in Nr. Nelson's previous application in 1986, that sought a variance for the construction of a detached garage, that this issue was not raised, as part of that application did indeed involve the difficult access via the current driveway that serves the property. If the current application is approved as proposed, Mr. Nelson's problem may have to be resolved via other means. The City actually has three options of action involving the present request for vacation, as follows: 1. Approve the current partial vacation. 2. Approve also a partial vacation but include Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, Block 15 and table formal action by the Planning Commission until staff is able to advise the specific owners - we do not want to create another problem as was created for Mr. Nelson in the previous vacation of Oak Place. 3. Total vacation of Forest Boulevard, Vine Place and the park of Saga Hill Revised. Staff would then recommend that we once again table action on the current proposal in order to contact each of the subject properties in order to resolve any access problems that may result with the complete vacation. Note that the City will not vacate that portion of Buff Street or Summit Avenue but would maintain the 50' corridors to the lakeshore as fire lanes. This action is consistent with previous vacations. Staff Recommendation Staff would rec following findings: end approval of the proposed vacation based on the 1. The steep topography and location of the shoreline of Forest Lake within the platted right-of-way would prohibit road construction. 2. There are no existing utilities within the subject area nor are any utilities planned within this area in the future. J V.-' J '•u. Alr-\. ^ V' 1 ( • * i'» i . ■'S f’"'- . * V • > I- - .V » «■ i t > i 1 1 /). T08 Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building a Zoning Administrator DATES June 16, 1988 SUBJECTS #1299 Nancy Higgins, 3017 North Shore Drive - - Conditional Use Permit • Public Hearing lOEIEG DISTRICTS LR-lB, 1 Residential Unit. acre, or 43,560. s.f. required for 1 PBRTINBET SECTIONS 10.24 Subdivision 3 (A) (Review ordinance #29 Second Series, section, 1 guest housess A separate dwelling constructed on an existing undivided lot for the sole use of the occupants of the principal buildings, including their demosetic employees or their none paying guests. All regular lot requirements shall be met by the guest house. LIST OF BEBIBITSs Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D > Applicant's Addendum Exhibit E - Map of 75' Setback Area Exhibit P - Survey RBVIBN OF AFFLICATIOHs - ..vThe applicant has been asked to file a Conditional Use Permit for the existing caretaker and guest cabin on the 3.65 acre property, at one time owned by her parents. Ms. Riggins plans to demolish the existing principal residence and construct a new residence. The Ross family has subject property since the 1930s, acquiring Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 in 1936. The storage building and summer house property acquisition followed in 1941 (Lot 4). The properties are all legally combined as one lot. Applicant was advised that the City could not issue a building permit for a new residence structure without first establishing a legal use for the two existing residences on the property, as there is no record of a Conditional Use Permit for the guest house or caretaker house. The caretaker unit is currently occupied by a caretaker and the guest cabin as the summer house has served the family as a summer residence for the family and guest visitors, but has no heat or air-conditioning. Applicant had advised that she and her children stayed there when she visited her parents. Applicant does not plan to raze either one of the structures but plans to continue to use them and would at some point like to do some repairs to both structures. a < •• % r V i Mr. Cooperman# the applicant’s architect# is in the process of preparing plans for Mrs. Higgins new residence structure. The applicant does not wish to proceed with new plans until the issue of the guest and caretaker units is resolved. J ^ '■ '( (• ^5. r f • t IrfI i/- ' V4 .. ^ *t* < • ‘ ^ Zoning Pile #1299 June 16» 1988 Page 2 o£ 3 s;.sr .Si: ff'.v.'.U”C. r“*r-’sor seconu story additions to the guest cabin located within the 10 substandard side setback area would require a variance review. The property easily satisfies the area standard for 3 residential units providing 3.65 acres (3 units » 3 acres). As for a required lot width, it is difficult to deal with a lot width standard when we are dealing with existing structures. Condition of said S?lncical design of the structures suggest an accessory supportive use to a stJu^ture and use. Applicant would be well advised that when *^«lfcating the new principal structure that care be given for a protential subdivision “ time l^the futur.. Remember Lot 5 we. . .ingle .operate lot and was acquired after the other lots were bought as one unit. The property has 300+ feet along the shoreline ff Crystal Bay and can easily satisfiy a new residential unit at the 140* width standard. On Julv 20, 1976, the City issued a general permit for 3 separate sewer connections to the 3 existing residential units and 3 SAC charges were also collected with the connection fee. Applicant shall also be advised that at the time permit application that the City will ask for an proposed^new hardcover. Applicant should be made aware that ^|j® **?J®?**?J2 ChaSnel is considered part of the main lak^s of .^®^®75* setback area is also measured the channel area. Review E^l E, there is approximatley 1.25 acres of lands involved in ^*»® protected area. This would leave approximately 2.4 acres or 104,544 s.f. of area in the 75-250' setback area that would allow 26,136 s.f. + of hardcover for the total proporty. ®**^To*appr^^”onditional Use Permit application of Mancyu Higgins that would formally recognize the existingserve as an accessory use to the principal residence located at 3017 North Shore Drive, based on the following findings: 1. The caretaker unit use has existed on the property since the mid 30's and the guest cabin use since 1941. Both guest cabin caretaker residence have served the existing principal residence since that time. 2. In 1976 the City issued separate sewer connection permits and charged individual SAC fees for the 3 residential units. 3. Lot 5 with guest cabin was purchased by the previous owners 5 years after the purchase of the principal residence and caretaker lots in 1936. The City has issued permits for the repair of each ¥■ i >■ a t • f r * < • i iS.Ifit ?■ ■ 3J n■*»r I >» *y^ ‘ 9^4 a»t^i<i»i<M '%ir ii • « • k a * • j/t V ^ i^‘\yu 4' ’/I < •• > il.• . 1 •> ■ ./ Zoning File #1299 June 16, 1988 Page 3 of 3 structure and can be confirmed in the files of the City for the past 30 years. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 Th« caretaker unit is not approved for rental use but for the Mcl».lvrilM of «ret.k.r or hir.d help of the owner, of the property. 2. The gueet cabin .hall be for the exelualve of the ■eb^ra of the fanlly of the owner of the prlonclpal reeidence and la not approved for rental use. 3. All new eonatruction on the property aha 11 ‘>« ordlnancea of the City that govern the developnent of lakeahore property. A. t. W IV- . ■* ■ ■# * - >- X' • i. J t. •** • ."t- ■ r A * i .vf h /<' f ) 4 </' Zoning File #1299 June 16r 1988 structure and can be confirmed in the files of the City of for the past 30 years* Approval ia subject to the followlnp conditions: -eoriv%“rsrVl “c"ir%ilt"ef i-p ':rti.-oln‘*e “r\ ‘o^ property. ?he £’i'»^l“Vf'throl'lfeV o1 'the V^^^clp*al ’'^e“s!dfnce'’^II^ u"not approved for rental use. 3 All new construction on the property shall be subject to the ordinances o£ the City that governs the development of laReshore property. V , ^ ’ ■ V ■ t *' i / : - -1 / V V m ’.■r ft- Km 4 .Ji • \ ' - ■i < ■ r. a' ' I r. ■ [ 'Tr n * ' % . ’ ‘I’'? ■.’" ^ !^i.* ' F. .'V • !l *■ V > * • « - Gni^L'IAN^ «3QO frosB fiPniiCATioii f }•CITY OF OROMO PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 3017 N. Shore Drive« Orono, Minnesota___________ Pj^operty identification NuinLer (P.I.D.) 09~»<7~23320002 Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not includedrry ,;r on required survey, _ _ Phone (home) 938~47‘^-0R^ Name Nancy Higgins_ _ _ _ _ _ _ l j- i/1 bun lifV • \Tkf r - Phone aiUm Y471-S|a^Suinnffr Re%^,h00 -------------- ----------------------------i^EitlPT-JHA^K YOU Address 201 Homedale Road_________________ City Hopkins ^-c:y(gU>g9343i^^^ OflNBR (if different than applicant) Phone (home) _______________ Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired ^^ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES ~ CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee Residential accessory Use Institutional (church, school, etc.) Duplex Credit/Bldg Commercial/Industrial Use Land Alteration After-the-Fact Fee X $100.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) $200.00 f) ■ ^ . ' .■ ) Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore .Mjesai PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $150.00 _ _ _ _ $250.00 _ _ _ _ $150.00 _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 _ _ _ _ $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals i • ( Other - see fee schedule K \ m % % •' y- ■ -.V' ^1; ' ^>sr '%* 1' ■ ‘I I 1 **- ^ • f -"' ■• • i,j €{jyy' PRBSBIIT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District LR-IB r */(r Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) CRIPTION OP RBQOEST Describe request in detail: Conditional Use Permit For Caretakers And Summer House(See Attached) ' ' 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. JJ^operty Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271/ stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addreased to each of the names ^ liilliWtf ■3. 4. 5. on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements).Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of _ _ _persons you wish notified of this application. Property Owner must sign this application. Please application is not complete if the above inforr^ation hasnot been included. 6. 7. 8. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ Date APPLICAHT'S SIGNATURE Applicant's signature Date 0MNBR8 SIGNATURE acknowledges and agrees to this application and further property by City staff, consultants. Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Date S' "3 “7- city offices 25 days before the Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the . Applicants must be present at all scheduled unable to Vttend°^^^^* Commission and Council. If an applicant is authorized^aqent fleeting, please make arrangements to have an-®.“9ent attend in vour olac« anH a.u_ r _Office of this change prio? to “the'’mte?in?5 ^he Building i Zoning J h r #■ ■V-: iViV'v: . % V- ^ I r r«: I- r~ ) > /* ( • ■ K ’’■ms _ ‘f ^,. 'i^#. s^- «i ’■?rM!tr.r.- .- ■'i. ' ••‘- - .■ • i" ...•■ .’^ '\f.. V- 4120 ■■ •• ,^,'V" t:m .# V «"r. . -•• > . -.: %\ <6- a - ; ■ • >• \ s:^' --■ V^v b- ‘^"* ,; '■ •• ■ “*'■\': V i - ‘ -V- r ' ’‘O ' ■ •' ') ml jSI ii 'TS 1 .-mM IM!" ^' ' •■ ■ -^ ACREAGE »w 33.81 S.V sw 39.80 1/-1 l ' sE_ A0.27! 40.56 3E tiw !>•« 40.32 j 40.36 1/4 ' Ne' 1 SE 40351 40.40 -^^!ae’,■^ g. !>IUE ..V County r4uf 4 ■h' ;'"! 7}^^:. 7..- -vr- ^ -- ■•> - >r •■ -ifec-:iv = • •^■ -:^^ a- •^-=- '':■-’ • • ... ■' i- i/ ■ ■ ’ ’• •*- ^§^ • ‘ > -»r%' ^ *;^ "f® ^ •i';V; i... • -VVf'vv? IY^-^'Vr: -«.*tet- rumiaa caHHusna imrua coDaaAmusimnvi- Ed caiiahu tcnm inn 1. 11207 Otiw • Cathatln* Seanloa, 201S Caacs PsIM toad - Conditional Daa Por-'t ( Varlanea - laeaad ■aataa 2. 11279 Poa Tint* 44t9 Porth shorn Drlva - Varlanea - Caatlnuatlen of Public Marin i. 11290 Nandy L. Htlla, 1379 Mldur Park Road - Varlanea - SMond Sarlav 4. 91290 Janaa » lorabea, 4490 Mrth Shorn Drlva - Variance a Csodltlcnal Daa Pnralt - Pablie Marins $. 91291 Alfrnd IvarCon, 2919 Caaeo Point »ml -nAxrw r cascO Varlanea * Pvblic Haarln^ #1393 Oraea Baptist Church, 2BtO Shadywoea 9am Coodltional Oaa Parait • Public BtaHaf varlanea • Pub Baarlnf on a Rick lanea - Publle Baarlng 10. 11. 91297 Maahlnstoo Selantitle Jne., 2909 Mat Myiata Soclavard - CocMrelal Slta Plan Mvlaw - Publle Marin. 91299 Richard Johnaon, Vacation of Portlona of Foraat Roulavard, Sa.a sill Ravlsad - Public Baartn. Parolt - Publle Saarin. RBDinaau. itbu 12. Plannln. ccoolaaion approval of Juna 9, 1999 Ninutaa. 13. Planning Coanlaalon to aalact a raprcanntatlva to attend tha July 11. 1999 Council Maatlng. 3 to 1 ^ u O) i sgi " 5ro _ s«ll ““5?£y Ss r=S"S'^5s “s Ss Is^lliiia'; |2. iriss" ^ Q) 3 =3- ^ ■iX :;,„i^-bor+ g is sig^g^i.Si- 3 3 S'^r+S,rD</>r+ 0;0< g^|s52§SSg aS-D^‘”S,cu ^§v< .— S 5&5r+0. g;;o ,„c = e;Q.o = ro2 CD 3 ig i? f? “5 3 5 !L “* "*3-J3^-S<D>^n (/> ^ n> i ^alKP!il fg^o 3 °S““2 S- in tt '* 1^,23 ^0 > 3 m V) 70 — ■'< O 7^ O r*- 3 ;i' •.-T'-'r li ,rt: 14 ■ ■ ~.^ • ~ V '^T-T-; •:r.i-____: ':f: r^‘*€-7- -V-iL ■•.:■*?'iaa 2’*?.-' <r^rt3*<<* ^r*ib!? ^ . — << - s; 3 2 a -•-o cr«5 = = S- S*2.?S,i||^|S %r*t E. 5?foi Si»r: S3<»Ofas ■0?r>J?r\j2»tnf5»Q»r»£<0^^^ O0 iA ^ ^ |Iii:l3l5c j“*s5s§=t?: sfS'Siss: 2-220**^ »S!?s-^5=:5 ?o = f j^lPI s lll!i-K aiA ni'< 5 rf 0) ^ o ||=|ifSs as. ilsf^sss ■-“ -5 ^ n o> o r» T •a roOi o n rf o 3 -’I'D ro r*^ Q, : V • ■ ■'' 5 to Sg z a, mSa 5 z IVJ t ^ s-"*Ipia 2ri - 55 {J!g "5 35 s -I g 2 , ‘Sf V V- >; ''-i ■■■.’^-• ■ m II 7^ '■■•’-•: Mmim -mmM - ?? •-. TN'H^l^tu E;US:VA^^K -Ws5P. _ik t- ■ "T^*.'^mm&‘ lippIJi Y\ ^UT»4 EJufs/ATiOH \ J w* 1'-^" Gl2£>/li r «f t f ^--rr _ ~ 4,A -rs>K?<siigAPHi.i> ^usver. I" » V-<5”‘ ■;-■ 51: rt ■^:- mm . . ^ sv.rT;t'?rTji ^3:; L-r- iiii^iiilisiilii iiitiilik> sm i'liiflSiiSSii■WWI mMCjli -4.-1 ■ ;••- ^-' VI / ■'TiS'-' 4 ^1* ii. ..i’ ^/2.20 mi :iai<sB ’''«iis?.?i!i?ai iHiiWifiE Jiitiihi^'isijiiHi . ‘liifi.ttj^'iii^-ni feIA U&»r feUfeVATI^S iJ '/e>' *i-<7" v* ??■ •• 5>vx: /c- »*,r- . i « ^5',-- " I 1“ \J^f^ S""i'-o- •• *89 “ s?aea I?- 5: I®! * ff-s;| H, Bg O t* 0 • R3i 1^- ^ o» o3 Rb « • BO Sb • o ra5 8 ?S ii •b !i.O- 3. ?l 0'S >1^ H» fS 3* fr ft " " B (»h i H* B B 3 r R (ni H ? g s s^fib'h*^2 3 .1 B ~ O2 8 3 * g h3 i l|!n'»pr ^O ^ S 9 9 JT ® Ss|s*lr5i if ms I S 5 ? o> 2 ***£*&t*MOf H ^,,5. Ro._-. MO. ►lO ii|gSi: fsS^sfs S* » aR^S i?S‘":5B4r- B B S3 R»^R *?!£•!? S* ^n ^ *t 9 S &* o o _• et r^?3:| B *1J) « C« B *tS£?*»M§S ^■^b Sm blsSs5s?asSoi^S'i,. »c*BeBB ’B’<*0 -_____B M • B _<♦ ‘ S B O ?2L?E5-?r?-'* o H 0 e B 4R&^Rrs?:; SStr'IoE-** R55R*5RB‘ 5s^- BiToa- B O W ft. ?• RSoR..3J“" B ® s- r RRSo^a^r' • B *i Ct 99 BT m 9, MHAUUBBp glfi^lsK J * B- O . ,« tr*y B) M cr rK»*^-e' *9 rt'o «€♦£»_!— sOBagMO SoJ&a-S.?.»<-0 M C o o HsII«8 OH 3 •! €♦ » |b S ^ B c 3 ao !Ff;:ii & B ^3 jUsSift o 3 ““S** Strata Ift .M ft(t B a •» •grSls^n 9 M <♦ w B Ci <tH B’»« r» O 1 RUtpS*^' O O ct • 1-9 . ^R--SRrJ €♦ H CP a B 9 o |TBk«(*ct, |i> M • HB^aCno M O O B ^ O ft 0k«* ■B B c* O C M 4 VC «♦ cn O O e» • _ s:r3i?iw 3 • ® «*(R V-ssis.‘"®?sr5 B H 9 1^ p M> S2.iSi : vjM • « O B B 5 If»« m 9 *TS^^ a • B • Ofr3.s»si:s •S'" I R SS*»2 • ^ B H 9 1^ p & JSSSlloR .ft*, ac*cM M ‘'gg^'-irs o-O « ►-•« » • *< _• O OB nan •«. c* IsiBfgs .-SR?r£S® SRS S' <n . obom - B..C ftO §» R*“i o 1"^ R5 RR • S mS S3 •KS^SSSon MO o o >» T' ll I o kO •ifl i£ Mr* 83 S3 8? P ^ *a B sE 8!«*« f n o o n a 0 o at B a c*m o _ Ha* • _ 9 M a tn Mc* 5Su o X O O ft o o ■ >i a M SSS3SS a o OB ■* a .<* ff8RS*2L^R?8& Sj;;.Mi«-S0SSS RR5-S‘^3P.=R- O<*0OftO'.<S 6*0 arra®Oc*SSa c*otSBMOOtrao a at) a mb a t**e § ?** S' M R 5 M S R5S-~.'-8?m aSglSJ^c-i*" %^'*3SigS8 j25:S5S,,rRRS 1 !fS*iO-fSacogorR C» I- - CTO “’s:• M a O g> M ™ Mft >f ft •« 9 ® «* C _ M a fto-jr* BOt-9r*aoao*ao>-kO ftcrtiB>f m9 X iiSSSRftSR?.o a a ft a aM a e* ft(K tt 9a-'o8 ’o23cao •3"9.3s RSI §'’2;«-?*SSS Mr.srt:g.-s2 2. 5*at:g>‘'.i* ^ O.BM >Bao4 m8 3-* o a c* jj. PPHPO iiBM>•92x39*1.*-- a I 3?8R2.?Sc3« &is“*fi&S-^ft Rss;s?««|?s sI-3 s;R3>« 8 .a cr e *< f» a mm" a a b S&m' B M*0 I o c* o o •"S.JJSffSSo.'’*’ o a fto a 9 Wj* 9 0 0. a a M t* •*x3S OJ a -> M» a-o - M0 a D • o ^2. S'*'S‘"&9 a t*«* O a BO 3lilt S1g5 »-£rIrj 8 I M sls« g§i o 3 ►* O I «• a M €♦ P flli R*r" «0 MCOns •EbII BM •«isl;Ib1 ToSS R2*’m «*. M ss-m:* » hings.*- i3t M K*flu: Hi 2 ^•a as eg •8 RR i-a |5 PI 8?i AM *"I" 4?E If Ieif :i E' Eg o 8 I: a <0 ?a 30 m O E3|P • 5ffE? ?°* 88111 = M >» O </»c 30 <m ■< cs A vi- ;■'rM ■ ;' ■ ■ '■- ;■J 4- ir NJW_ AODinON Base and Ccver Faditi^ <^1 Waahinglton Bctontiflo lndusftrl«» T A% snifnN® TM« VOOT iS°*i^^SBS3 r ■*‘ i-:. 1 ^ ^ .4 RACK, nABCTA PAN'SL&, 0% OBCOAATVE BCOtftA JfP»^ Bam D - wjp tf ONCOSTS B;^>CK----------weoHi^r— # ’' H» '•r”rF* '4:f:\ :~h ' / y ■ i '.B: I ■ L /' N / \/ N <1 / ' \\ X AUVCOe>OND FAeCiA NrrHPBpwws*JT"iH Bi«*» BACK mii: =-■ Ir t NBW BKIC.K FACE________1^,' l-:-- V // £>&’'& BAICF.^-—#' g &m, 05KMBK e^KBCBee jU gMlinwI;: SBW CKlCK __ TS CONTRAST ^:¥. 1 t -4 NBN BAtCA •a mi gi; ".-imit-1 1-.} \’ / A V,\/ f ,r j; sree. c3'«'«k- y IVeCiA PAUB l ALTSKU/fl-WB Bwgr^JS____ 611 WW&’X BPICK. Tcr BKHD AJEAHATiVE EnSlfe K3I/A|J 5w6'‘>43 fcfllCK- mxpp: N«W AcwmoiJ "x ■ ^ Base and Cover Facitiss^ Washington Selontiflo Induatrlaa 0[] TM« VOT COWPOWATIOWi ■ ■CITUIM ——BWN1 wmaoeMLMiMMi y ‘ |T------^-------- -T . ..................................................................................................................................................—----------------------------------------- '--------1-------- BKC'C, FASCIA FA>^e;-S CK 3BC0AAT V8 t^K. 'PFSK EA^^D--------. ' "'ACB6MCK — 5’4p?fV , MB n r'^A^Jrl^J,3^ TO V\ATC*1 &WflT'» |i V 0 cok;.PWoiK* Vs NBST \ /\ / M(?BTH (’l^l&HNAr 1-2) 5:,SVAT10H .; ;V ■ - S‘;V- ■• «■■ >i < .DHI 23I«T2UaHI 3niTH3n> H0T3KIH2AW ,tc junxntsi ifltXUSS :A J30M4 JATmtXmi ONOAO ,t i30l« .•Vl*ul3nl tl rfpurirf) I q»nn«R bsbto^i »its et Mibtoasr t *Wia fljosnU )« iu »AlbwlM«i XM‘1 JAlRTaWill C. c\r fl^uoa *rfi 1e ^*4 i»ii3 ifA •pnaA iC.oR «8XX qIrtcnvoT ,CC t»miro> •* Mdli^ob .nAlbii^R (»8» .p4 .pXN 1 8 )o >M »e«diioM :in<l »rtt )o U .-lo Xnioq • it pniMtMctoD t»miro> •* bMli^ob .nAlbii^R lo 7 r1 o4 mSl S* »\f 8a«»dXio8 Mm lo mU rtJueS ii*d Jnloq bist ,lo«i*rli M foO odt to *<ill 8««V odi dll>i t\l (ltwo« lo »nil taftU tl) lo U*‘9 8««1 tr.0«e( iitaXa I bift« •m lo onlf i««4 *rfj poor* d ioR oormIJ ;»M 2 lo ».i/I rtt-ioJt *.•‘9 a »t«l 3d no Jnlo4 « pnlot. ta lo will »a«U t ;is9l e.0«» anif »\i bl*a oi 8»9l e.0«» da«3 oonadi !• lo 89Mla ffia lo notiioq .bala:>«v ad oi to