Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-21-1988 Planning PacketMEETING DATE CM FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) ■• -.j*^ r" V . • ^ : w -n, . .mrm \ <, :T: s.--- •■ “ w:f Kr’<- ■ r' ■mmimmJ- : *;■ ! •• •.■.*• ..’ ■'; ‘i :••. .V' :iiaitiiii|^• 4i»: ■■-' -r- i. ■■■'PUBLIC ATTEWPAWrE! CITY OP OROCK)llEETIKG DATE 3'^l~ PLEASE PILL CKJT THE IRFOBiAIIOB REQUESTED BELCH im WR CITY RECORDS. ' sm HAHE (pl«a«s print)ADDRESS KAMI OR NU^OIER ■K '• V.-•.•'*• ;•.: .•;■ 1. >Lacl^ijf 1 rc%ii»«P4^A rwn ixxrooi «9«na ^j’ t'^ ' L y/h** S \/7if Svi'"''.- L-fr nrn|4t> 0 mmm 17. 18___ 19. K*^/4/ 20. ■S^^ g ii, ^ ^ m fjK 'y ■HiIf:-?;."'••••••;- ^■yy i^xyr ‘ «i V- t &m 4-7^'-.iii V ■X.Ul fT <r^c V*0® ri15 n JP L.r:,«pcPl’BLlC ATTENDANCE CITY or OWr«>')MEETING DATE 3 t' PLEASE PU L OLT THE IHTORHATIOII REQUESTED EEtOlf POR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (plaasa print I ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1.yVj j w r ^ i f v"/’ -'* / 2 <" / 2. -J f r * 1 0 3. lAFP-^f' tCoane-rK-fZ-i\oi^ IT.. f^tiku:f.a mLl -■'"fifai Jer ____LIT^^.a . t/ '/.•5S7 c 'H 15. it#>J ■/ 0 C> 1 >* /r f ^ > \ >» 6.^Lte^iAx . \ ^£ i #ia /H a r - ' ------------- 7. J^ic/\0-nA 0 ^ 9. * Ci:oi^^ / lO. T\^v-v V\uLVoriA'i-'^'U:xki<Wii 4^ A^mL-4lr as4. ► 1 • >-< v""^ . 1 ri f t Y f ^zTc V^tr t'Hii\4Jb^L H i .i ii ti 2, i r. t\\i»7-^^: A-c''’/7rt/iClk<.' /I/*' • ^ /{5 rVi .4. 4< F ^ f »I l!u.Nw.TA.^r-.L^f-./7 ry .5.'^CTdfitP^n PC’u:iMtf/j)1 6.,:wc kKfY^'\((U y7¥t?^jL\'^rMi it 17 M ? • _(3|li li/'lc f V'c»\vn ^ij/y 5 c/ik \ 0. «««:A- s; f- Mm i V • : • • .* • *1 ■ ■ '. ■ ■■■:■ .'.'■ ' ■!•: ••’ . -•'■>,,:.Y. ■ •' .;=.' m^m rnmmM '-0 Inai PRD I Minutes. # .ve to atterifO the ,, *4 . • .« . ^ } ■iM ' /-•V ;..v V.-; .• .-. .:■ ::.i MMf MM PBV'-:,-: fcv' • a- ■ . - :, ';^' 34^^^ ■>/■•'■"• "I ■'4■ ■ ■■- ;••.'■ ■ ■-•'■••;■' . ■• • ■'■■■i■• • :..»<-'■■■X-:• , u m&i IBil J r-viV .■: ife ;:;fsS4;V4- ■4'i.8|Siilg9i[|i^^p( r ? i ^ s^ CO tv cJ "y A ^ J — •'J —^ -s f«4v4 « jt-TtT <S4 5:m V* V) ftw 5a:; -a? S3 39 ^ • % IS 5 ^ ^*55 5 5i 5 ... .•_.,. • -i «?! :) IT-} J: ^ a*^' './ pu w: r] [fe ------=rrr-/ '/ Avj^^- ------/ ’U_ /Tizr-r- ,. ; ~ 1 a •~zs>i!s^..i '—will- 1-.^St. i \-1 1 A T \- m.j^ ...........i -i. ,1 ....... 1 to ' - ' ■’ . y ••*• V;’ .•• -k -■?i m. ^4- ■■■■ ''W9-'--'^ i WMM mAW:m (_ mn;M ^.:. .'. 1- . T'44 >38iS r«i ssssii I' / 4 / City of OROIVO City OF ORONO RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Na - 3.Approval of this plat includes formal acceptance by the City for public use of the road, the avenues, the perk, the drainage and utility easements, and the drainage easements as donated, dedicated and shown on the Plat of Navarro. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on the 13th day of December, 1982, by a vote of_ _^ayes and_ _^nays. William h. Van Nest, Mayor ATTESTI Alberta H. Strom, City Clerk 2 of 2 ■i • -1 '•i A - 2^^ arsCLt/Tf^ BC J^cco/ti>€:p By cny wtrf//i4T City of ORONO t RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNat NO._ _ _ _ APPROVING THE VIM OF NAVARRO INCLUDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 4 VARIANCE WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnosotai and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted comprehensive plans and subdivision regulations for tho orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application fer a planned residential development subdivision for 24 lots by Sebloa Suilders, Inc., the subdivider, and WHEREAS, Schlce Builders, Inc., the subdivider, has completed all preli*rirary and final requirements for plat approval as satfortb in City Council Resolution No. 1404 and No._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of tha City of Orono hereby approves tho Plat of Navarro, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1.Approval of this plat includes approval of a Planned Residential Development Conditional Use Permit which requires construction of 12 attached twin-homes, a total of 24 single family dwelling units, on tho 24 platted lots. Adjacent lot pairs shall be used for construction of the twin-homes as follows: 1 .ri 8: 9 a 10Bloch 1; Lots 14 2t 344: 546: 74 Block 2; Lots 1 4 2: 3 4 4 Block 3; Lots 1 4 2: 3 4 4: 5 4 6: 7 4 8: 9 4 10 2.Approval of this plat includes approval of nosU.nal net density lot area variance to allow platting of tho full 24 lots. No other variances for any setback, hardcover, height or any other zoning code performance standard shall be granted for any construction on any lot within this plat. 1 of 2 f , PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District L^~l C -1 Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST rvr=?rribe request in detail: 2. 3. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form, Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stampedr legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)tnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office cf this change prior to the meeting. ; CITY OF ORONO - G1 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address o'/ ^ U i 'Q Q -jf \ JL UW|j OSB -Jtfl^IC^ ^1/ r-O Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property abstract or _ _ _ _torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) OF OROHO FIHANd OFFICE Please attach legal description to application if not included 01 CEH 150.00 on required survey. ^h^ck jL 150.00 APPLICANT Name r/J^/J Phone (home) 4^2* oREC^I^I^^I^^ ^ »0iil60 L'OOl ROI tl5:J7 _Phone (work) ________02/2A/a9 Address ~?%16 M____________ City Maja U Zip SrST2^*t n applicant) Phone (home)___________________ Phone OWNER (if differe Name / ei^ than S Address City {Zip Date Property Acquired l> 44.t*^*"**!!month/year) I (do)) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES - CONDITIONAL OSB PBhiilTS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Pact Fee - Double Current Application Pee $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule — OTHER APPLICATIONS _ _ _ _ $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _ _ _ _ $250.00 Vacation _ _ _ _ $150.00 Easement Vacation _ _ _ _ $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _ _ _ _ $250.00 Rezonii.g __ _ _ _ $100.00 Appeals * __ _ _ _ Other - see fee schedule mm Zoning File #1252 March 16, 1988 Page 3 of 3 Note that the areas are approximations by the applicant of the remaining undeveloped lands. The formal conditional use permit application would required certification of areas by a surveyor. Staff would add that under the formal application the City would be looking for building area controls and exterior material controls for future construction of the single family residential units in order to protect the current existing twin home residences and the integrity of the original Navarro plat. The City Attorney has confirmed staff's direction to the applicant regarding what the formal application should involve - a conditional use permit to amend the original PRD of Navarro; and upon confirmation from the surveyor of the areas of existing development in relation to undeveloped areas, the possible need of a density variance. Planning Commission should advise applicant of any concerns as to the change in the mode of development, density issue, any other controls outside of the building area for the single family residences and exterior materials control - other issues that Planning Commission feels should be addressed by applicant. Applicant is hereby advised that once the mode of development has been approved with the conditional use permit, that he would no longer be able to return to a twin home development. Applicant may also wish to reconsider the placement of the single family units, it may be more advisable to place a twin home within pads 7 & 8 within Block 1 rather than a single family residence as all the other units within Block 1 have been developed as twin homes. Applicant must make these final determinations at the time of the formal application. Please remember, our job is not to deal with the marketability of single family mixed twin home uses. There is no formal recommendation required by the Planning Commission, merely provide conceptual direction to the applicant. If members have major concerns with the planned change of development of Navarro, they should advise the applicant right now. In fact. Planning Commission may wish Council to confirm conceptual direction to applicant prior to the filing of a formal application since much of the final changes of the original Navarro plat were made at the Council level. Zoning File #1252 March 16, 1988 Page 2 of 3 exclusive of the public road areas. The City claimed it was an error based on current information discovered in the third review. If you review yo’ir PRD and the LR-lC-l sections of the code, you will find no cx^ar direction to the City regarding PRD density credits. The variance was granted based on the fact that the applicant had dedicated for public roads some 1.39 acres in area. The retention pond within pads 6 & 7 was also not included in the net area. Twin homes have failed to sell. There has been no interest In building on the remaining 12 pads in the last 4 years. Current Proposal - Review Exhibit C Mr. Haugen seeks permission to put single family detached homes on the remaining vacant pads (refer to Exhibit B). Each single family residence can easily meet the required setbacks of the LR- IC zoning district of 30' front and rear, and 10' side. Staff has advised the applicant that in order to build single family residential units within the Navarro plat, the applicant would have to file a formal conditional use permit to amend the original PRD mode of development. The LR-lC-1 density credit would no longer apply. Upon approval of a conditional use permit that would amend the PRD, the only other technical legal step the applicant would have to take would be to combine each pair of pads prior to the issuance of a building permit or more appropriate upon approval of the PRD. Applicant is aware that 24 sewer and water assessment units have been paid against the property already. Applicant does not claim to seek any credit for the additional units not used - applicant has not paid the special assessments, the current owner (the bank) has paid all special assessments against the property. Current PRD Proposal - Density Credit - 12 existing units + 7 new units ^ 19 total units PRD under LR-IC Zoning - Required « 9.5 acres, 413,820 s.f. Proposed « 7.8 acres, 342,846 s.f. Variance = 1.7 acres, 70,974 s.f. Undeveloped area = 3.8 acres, 169,479 s.f.(include area of drainage easements within pads 6 & 7 as density credit of LR-IC- 1 is no longer applicable). Existing 12 units under the LR-lC-1 mode: Required <= 4 acres, 174,240 s.f. Existing = 4 acres, 174,240 s.f. New 7 units: Require = 3.5 acres Remaining undeveloped land 3.8 acres pm ects of data'*, or a permit or partments may dential inform- o dei-cnnine se requested. may require ocal, state :y to process council icoias public. to review aired to process sral permits) . •• :' :v=:;.a.,:v:,- '-A:m ::• ■ --i.-G ■./••".■• . .•;■'. -f-...■ ■,. ..■ .- ■■.. ;■■ .:- . .^ ;' ■ a , - •■ i: v ';-v; .' :■ ■ . . ■ ■ ■ ■. ■■'■ ■■ . '^■' ■ ■ ;.■ ■• .•■' a -Gi..:'■•••■ a 'Mi- ■' ■' : ' imi- ■ « ;... - x -»•.>, :,;-r >?'. ■.■ .-..■i. .■.}■ ■'..v. • ^ -.: - ■ tii.-Vi-"'..'/-■■'i*■'.: , I { ’■-'■■■■ /:,■ ■ i-1 l-l ••V ;V jmmMyy •;-r-v:V:..V, :• \:<■:•;• r\-V.-;vV Pll^ mm^mm ~'r-W k‘'’S5’Pi iL- .^rr.‘■■ -^'cV : ■'■ "•wmmmIt:--W-AMZi-y-MWm «iv; v^.; a-:-pin. ■' ■•■.Wi'/'t ir- r ■: V • :'r ) t 4 - • ;.•■ • 'rV" .■•••- . ' • -V; ■;: ^: ■v.--;a'. ,; crnmyim-Bmmmy '^myrn. .':;v :•"/•.•/:i■->;;• a a::;. . • .;■••• •■ : r. ••-V./.'. •■■5» " : '. ■ :■ .^!.i rlaiP'S' Pr- -• • ■•.,:n* ^ ■ liiiMil':'.t S/‘ :.KKi~'-G::fca. wy-fc.;.v •' . .. . •r::j. • Kofl m ff.:mM L -:y V- - . • •T' ^ : r»>VG: \ : ■■ •■.’■:,;.i'5 V-. ■;•:•* ■■ mW:%■!(::< ----y- -Va" ;y:.y.:^yy:y ^G.jr- vrvvG,. ■.*•• . - . ^v; ,' ::'Va a ■ ;vmB ■G-fv'G- ■ ■ ,:'.'v=.:-.= •. .f •mm d::: .■ ■■?Sfed' .m::.mp^-■d .d :’v.^ >/’■•;■ .•■•,■ •••<»'•= ■.. •■ ^>:rf; • yj^tr! I S I £ M »H <0«laoucu > oo •o s f-4 c •H IM 0 c •H i4 1 r ^ O«s ^ •4 *o *D< 2 Oo «H £ - o O c «H »4 O* o •H 4J Ift U « > o o *o 40 X MM •O €l «ao Vi X M Cc • • • <M «H 4m • • • tt a tt IM a o C a a c f-4 a M *H *J a a o •o aC 5n^ 9 a V4 a us o %4 V’ ■' mymy-ry'jm I? V‘'^ 4d v^■'^. yV- y.,.:;y ■■-■■ ^' .Pyrn'* • v!:-'V 'r •■ '-iM imyp^pmppi,.«*¥ , •;: - i my i:^:-:m yy vv-.y . ?si^ yy'Cf'dy wm. fm^yy ySyy^ P^- : - ' * V y ■;••■. . -\ ' :■.■■'■ ■: yn:Pw-.> - ’ ■ ■ ■•*r :^ •• .y V\.'v!-:y.* y • 'y y- yy/y-i-vV.. ■ ../ ■mm • yjv 'Mm^i kpy^ i f •:. ;y ^^ -•••>' .. yy;•.■*< lyy 8??' T*. yi'-y.-yy > -y;y?yi jS0y»; dsK?;;vvr,: jk‘ ■ - *■ 0" • ■’'■mp ■ ::yPP:PiP:: ' r ^■:", /: i?. • 'P-mmyV-'VP y-yy - '. 'm-'-p- ■P ■p-y. pp- -y^P •f;y-yy .-.v :■■ i PSm^■ 3>..' J In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform­ ation. You are notified that: The information you furnish will be used co determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2.You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3.The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4.If your requested permit or license reqirer council action to approve, some information may become public. Address //pyyO'y r?y- You have certien rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private d ua on yourself. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. Pf/LiPfU- A First __ _ Middle / ( n /Jf/^ rnTy) / Last <S:s 9/ bate of birth (does not apply to buildihg/general permits) (J7/-rY39\ Phone I under^and^my rights aV7St^tcd above Signature -: V ppy^xypy mt:;:^4:.Q y-:' ■ ■■'mmp.■ . m Vy; pM yrnyy. >■ myp - f ^mmmymyyy. !■:' ■ . 7 .Vy.’;- . iiv,t ■• •• ■ • ^,r:--:y '■ mx r \ ■: P. :•■ :v vv s,y wmvppppyy ypm ^pmmmpyy * F 'yyy^.ykypp.: A; j;---"-: ;; u.m~ - ■ mismkP m. ■■■■:■ PK P. *m P 'P-P- • : X^-p .:■ ir-yf:. xymy:^:yy-\ y yXyyM-m yy yyp^ kppyy fyyyy r< :•!¥{md '=^..- "vS ■..■-•■••‘.-1 •■* ^ •*wi^:i ■ • -jyv.; ■•?:■! '*'’:SM|njQB||MH 1 Piyy:y :y E ^y-yy' ■- yyyy;'^''.'H !ryy'::i y:‘:y H :V'- ^: :■ .•: ■yyy'-^y ■'':' ps'^ia ^ • V y;^:y;^va- m::S r Ll/::-; ^im "■o:a ^--v 11*^;*:, ■ .“'v: ■' -v,'yt,'::« >’i ■ ■- : .:■■'>-=♦ R'.:' Jf 1 ’' v'-,.,- j , ■' ■. ■'•= '-Vf i;^iv■t^■ . •*■• v-r.'mmyymwy^ ■ ' .•.■ Ifi^lPW- ■st'-"' • i-'' *ifi»i||j|| mm :"v::;:':;:;,,a.^^^^^ . XfX>mmm fy-yy-:^ wm i:W- : K- SSli #V' ■■’• '•■•■•-* K:; 'y-^:my^x :f-r-^.:; .■:.:^ -v-'v-- c‘>--:: >:•:. , •?=. ■■ ■'••. Vyy-:-: — !-'■•• ii; . 'y; ■..^Vv.;/.:-.;v:;; fc^:.v»?*41ISHMt 1tt»r . ■ ,. . .■•«#1 O *^Q 8 <H U « >ou•o «s» Cn C •«i4 n •«« K hi « O H <H %• W «M ^ • M IM %i %4 %M ^ • • • • M M « t ^ « Co M 4J •J <gH < I- «i VO M <9 C cr tr oo r-i 2 3-' <^ cr 3 • oo^ rHI U o >oo •D U <9 Cm O' C •»« *» M •H • O O 0 1oom %«%4 «} <rar~ 9 1c 0 M JZ C 4J m4 *0 1 1 ••>S C 9 %* 8 •" i £ 4>•o 1 1 1 • 0 1•D 9 9 •0*o 9 Oa 1 £ gn E irS > mm M 943 0 X A 9 A 9 H M M M 9 * ^ OL>. M A i M H M K 8 ~ CO Oh VI♦4 A' Cr ki c t Z#% < o <0 41 s4 Wi ^ III oc w a j 2 < Os%Jo•ou W i 1m [ 11 S «tion d l tfj ItemOic 44 Item1 —J jg s-4 *o •0 ic « fi Ml C •H Cm TJ « > 2 « Z ifi •i fn I C - ^ CM ^ « •S ♦ i4 ♦ \TN= so e- c •4 \P %4 •V •o *a z O'c •H «9 O O rH U « >ou •Q U « X *o 4f « cc & ao M Os «M ••••• • CM • Cm • Cm • CM> • CM • CM • Cm • %4 • Cm • «4 • %4 • CM A • Cm • Cm• • %4 9 %4 •%4• %••%4•CM• M • • • m • m • 0 • m • « • • • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 m 9 0 19 Vi M 1 o *1^ . 1 p P N ^4 rVo \T.rf'Ci, s ■1 1 1 1 1 ■f •1 ••1 ■ inr* Io oco ou «co M M OM i) m JC 4J•o •H c V cr ?C^or \ A eco »4 »4 «) >oo •D U 0 ff 01 c 4icn •rS Kw H M M K K g r ^v <A 6 ^ V A4 O' •^ 1 co r-l 9«i 1 o « 3o X « €> O' 40 iM sO o > •H Ua u 19> tt» •O CO •o o •H M U «9 111 O. O o0 c0« r< 10 « a c O s-« 19 •<H M « M *H 4> «n M 91 Oi O C *2 ^ Sa Ki C >« sC lO O 9 A « IM M O £ o u> «M . ■ Ifc •: ;*uu..<wa.-sinv o Wm--■piiPi^■-;:r.'« "■ ••’■■ ■ yy. ■fM *\-r - • " ■■'• : ,.v^ y • • ■•: :■ • ■' ‘rv-."K'Vv- .^y 'i.:; ^ i.‘'i '•.•♦.y V --♦■y -'y .'■': - -"i - .3^ telW ■y.'y. •"\.:-\y ;:-if ^:y r:m:ymm-ym4y-yw-s? --■• ‘y ytfi y:B;0y ■X ■'■■X~ ' '- ■ ■•■ .:'vV. • . ...'•'■ 'yiyy'm''y’^' y ■* y-'-;-'^^:: '■ .‘, ?' '.: ■•l syyy. ■■■:/,:■; ^ mym y. yy-yryx. mm Wm xymym '»■. •'•■ ■■•V ■• ■;' ' ■ ■ ■ . . -vJ: >i-'V :• yy / y.y:'e> E/..- |••^yyyy.yr.:• yy- y'^v:'y , mm yy- i^y mn: V:->'- /■ .>-,;yi :C [y'y «» ■•m cT <r 1 1 1 1 ■ O•c\gocTT'O M z »-1 K K K IK lU > vr 8Q vfS OS i o•»» • <M • A • IM* • %4 A <M•«M•%4• tfl • m IM• III %4• M l . f • M • n «M• #m V •1 wm W M Vi VI w VI VI Vi VI •u •1 1 a f 1 I 1 1 a f • • 1 1 1 1 H K M 4(K M K M K K i Jl 'm r-Ji^ :Mj4:-=ttfORKSHEBTopt«d an ordinanea Halting vloua Burfaces ("hardcover") located within 1»000 feet of »bria carried into the lalca the quality of water in the t rainfall run-off will be areaa before entering the I# We Hardcover is allowed tetween 75* and 250* froa the ired. d between 250* and 500’ feet hardccvered. 1 between 500* and 1»000' feet hardcovered. oea net abut the la)ce but la )e used as denominator In all of lot In 75-250* tone* parallel to ahorellne , h of lot In 250-500* tontf parallel to ahorellne > I of lot In 500-1000* tone' parallel to ahorellne pssilliM1:::.-- ■. ■' k UiWm a*SyiSli^v!5 ■- ' M ,V. ♦ c'-. ■ • .. .^ I V. >-:4 l-y ’'■ ^-v'^,«/’5'j '-»■ •• 3?:^:o V .■mi if' ■ y':&(*• •: iw:- . . ■ .; . .• ,-v.' ■: .; ■. ■• •- ■;■ " V -.-r. .' j: WMmfWm m y f=^v- \:r:y-'mcA.--;.: -■r -fV: - ■';■■■ /X^-X.Xr • •■*■'. • . .1 *'*:*^«» ■V •'••■-■•» UefeV ■•■■'34 ••:’ ■•.■ 3VgR OH.CtTtJ(TIOW SOMHAWYB.A.r. Lakeshore Setback Zone Lot Area In Zone Exlatlng Hardcover In Zone Existing Hardcover Percentage (B/A)xl00 Final propoaed Hardcover In Zone Hardcover Percentage (D/A)xl00 Allowed Hardcover Percentage |0, af 4-af 2^ -{76 af af e>743 4- af ‘^,1 af /fyz- af %af .\1 125 % %102^6 Bt .%30 % %sf %35 \RDCOVER LIMITATIONS HARDCOVER INCLUDESi - Structurea with roofs - Decka* even If slatted - Sidewalks - Driveways (paved or gravel) - Decorative landscaping areas underlain by plastic sheeting - Tops of retaining walla# roc< walls - Any other surface that does not allow direct abaorption of rainfall into the ground ROAD B. OTHER LAKESHORE REGUTATIONS SBC 10.22, BBCOLATIOWS FOR "LR-IA", "LR-lA-l**, -LR-IB". -LB-IC* AND ’J-R-lC-l' OBB x‘«. rx*r^-.7\.r z\.z r^.7o%f.Vc7o7.v« s: shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent and nearby lots. Subd. 2. Lakeshore Hard Cover Regulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating# filling, hard cover, temporary or permanent structures. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there srall ta no greater than 25% hard cover. Within 250 trsOO feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hard cover. Within 500 to 1#000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hard cover. subd. 3. Tree Removal Regulations. No trees within 75 feet of the shoreline with the diameter of six »',) Inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the Council. , ■mm rnfVm LV ■ \V.m ••• .••si:* ii,- v:...:.>;-;*:. mM: a ;.: :iv : ; .:•'i: :• v.v ■*•.• ^:.^V M^ km i:y r m •' ■■i#*mmm:yXx.:' "X • ■ ^vr ■ nm ^ b:i mrn-mm mMYi!mimYYm Tv: U*":,v iillip k ■ - ■rnkmkm"3,v LMSk'-i.•: • • ,■:: tc.:.Vi*;.;.;" .: :'-v ■-:.wmr.^:'Mm Ei mmft'-5fS IP&k^ *• rv* ' * »o •*"^ \rtf . . . ' ' • \:7V/ ' ■" ^/?M^ ^;«-v:tr . ■ m ■ ■■•• *•* \ • ». ^ ■ ■ /**• * 1' ’ . 1 . •*•”'• f • --* ■ >*«' -.•'^ • ^ •• •/ ■ ’ -►'* • *' •• ■* ^ '^’ * ^ * ■ •# . ^ ^' ' i'*.) V-IKil .'i .ZONE B ■-■ . ; -m !«»# : : . r : k-/y.r <y mm *.n ••V r;>.’ /-■■ V RMQ '■* mm:i ¥-i4 '■'S'-i? ¥:7>v JK;'';'. .-'i .■;;¥'l3ilpSi Mik wmM :25¥*. ;3fe££ii ii m to ;-ip-:" ■>'K\^r:\::-y_ ZONE A1; / (EL 930 ',. VM^-yc- .;-,:-;y:...^to.:,.;.- 3toife¥ foC33toVto.m ZONE A i|«S2Pv :V." ;••••: to: ^ .: .;j ■teSto"; to ■■¥:¥:■■ v. \ ,.;-';;to-:^;;.-"" to..--: -v.;-:-my- r-^y ,,r-, :p-^:y[:to- -■■'■ ■■:^y.itoJit» .-.W;;.v :j-'to - -to:^ ■to;-;-3 .:";-avm KmrnM w. ■ >" fyyyiy-: kpijtos^mm iliiP :totoi@ii«.. iiiae,'v ..^4' ■to-. toltoW f- MM iliPto £3li;^Vto3 3:Xvi:;A »H0C0VCT ORDIWAWCB - In 1975, th« Orono City Council adoptod an ordinance Halting .ha percentage of lot area that can be covered elth Impervloua aurfacea (•hardcover*) auch as roofs, drlveeays, aidevalka, etc, on properties located within 1,000 feet of n lake. Studies have shown that sedlnenta, oils, and debris carried Into the lake frM hlflhly urbanlred areas have a detrimental impact on the quality of water In the lake. The Intent of Orono's ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas before entering the lake. B. HAJU3C0VER SETBACK ZOKBS - PERCgWTACB ALLOWED X. 0-75*t in the ares within 7S* of the lekeshore# Wo Hardcover is allowed (01). IX, 75-250*t in the portion of the lot located between 75' and 250’ from the lake, 2» of that portion of the lot nay be hardcovered. III. 250-500*1 in the portion of the lot located between 250* and 500* feet fron the lake 30t of that portion of the lot may be hardeevered. IV. 500-1,000*1 In the portion of the lot located iMtween 500* and 1,000* feet from the lake 35% of that portion of the lot may be hardcovered. NOTEt These regulations apply even if you have a lot that doea not abut the lake but is within a lakeshora xoning district. HOW TO DETERMINE LOT AREA WITHIH EACH SETBACK XOWB (To be ttsed S8 denominator in all hardcover percentage calculations) 1. 0-75* Zone Area • 75* x /Average width of lot in 0-75* SoneN \ measure parallel to shoreline / 75* X \^4' ft. - In n^n s.f. (i) (Avg width) Area^of 0-75* *one 11. 75-250* Zone Area - (175*or avg lot depth in lone) x/Avg width of lot in 75-250* *one\ V measure parallel to shoreline / 175* X JZAf2^2tt. - 7AA16 s.f. (2) (Avg width)Area of 75-250’ rone 250-500* Zone Area « (250* or avg lot depth in rone) x/Avg width of lot in 250-500* sone\ \ measure parallel to shoreline / 250* X /t. - lOOf^s.f. (3) (Avg width)Area of 250^500' zone IV. 500-1p000* Zone Area « (500* or avg lot depth in zone) x^Avg width of lot in 500-1000* zone measure parallel to shoreline 500* X ft e *S.f. (4) (Avg width)Area of 500-1 f000* zone '-■••to.-to. :.*% 4 PliiSOTi tototo r^,ii;: to : ?:• v Ssto’toto‘3s3^.to:- 'v. ..-■yimsMc»: •« ; T •• --cV -'V- mmyM p3SK^^4M^to;to:': -to i-3' • ;■■■■ ■■:■:/.■ -,3.,r'- to'--to:-."-:->v;..vyto3to^ ;\.;;to;;to:tow.' to;' ‘3;/to.; 3':-:.to3pto V M' i *. fSBalr- ♦ - 'todvto ;3i^s i ■■ Kto" mMy:-: iMMMm p.- ■ ;,V;;*v to ■ ■..■'' : .to-.to*v-3.to"'tovv. toi ' ' . -.to*.■toto ' - : . to-fctotM' MW'^ Mm •=■•■■■■ ' '■ .totov^- ;to -. to ' . ; ■ •;to-to. to_ to. 3to-^ V- -to i,C^to; to ^ ; ■ ■ to.pi;V:to,^;; , , 1 I ■ 4 ' to-:■•■ 3^ ■■’■to' :• ’;to-ac"--' m-ir :tototo3 tol toto-to..';.: ::...• ■^. ... to;, .to.-#: -to. ; [/1r jw*r.: :3 • to 'to V'i -v .,rm %•«r L^:‘-'vV><; ,;*mmM?v-i"':;i-; v:, . .,p/;:;. ■ :•;;> ;;• ROL COMMISSION AL RESOURCES< 55106 fil ENO. 85 CONCORDIA STREET ON OF ROAD r review on the above Ication follow. is mainly a concern of 1 will have a chance to procedure. Preliminary raters will be minimal clstlng roadway. 1988, the Ehlert house elevation. Since the City of Orono's Flood flood elevation, we have ive^ that the Minnehaha vation.) the southeast shore of rs concerns* these projects. If you ■■ ' .1 ir 1 -i i-.J IPLOYER : ■ •V- mm. ^'f ■ -•••••:.. . -•j Saga IliU ZONE C »ii aflii :;4' • 4pt ^ b * ^'zone a 1;-1 ZONECFOREST ' LAKE. . li’ • . .._ -•'. . 11 w •.»>• •-* • ^ . j .. . • \ > • Sil limit of ^ ^.-detailed STUDY , V . ^ : «sj» .1-»I ,»2SS^%io ~~~— ^ - .Vi .,■< r. (ed ^' ■ ■l/;- m:. " ' '■ ■ "V*' .. • r. -, . .. v*<«- •■’•■ --^^A D wmm is®^|«a' Oetrinfl 'zON'rcP ;r.-.,-» OHW ' ‘I Citv of Spring Park AREA NOT INCLUDED C^ccfY^ r* I. ^ Uir>h ■L ••■ i;:;m V4v^4cv:4«/"i-.v:: 'mmt. ■4.,.v$fc.^-■;-'^:i .'^'i.::- • • " • K-, ■ '..K^ liiN.>; • A •di-.- v--r:?=V^lN(a »: kte» >kg* t^rt^I S’-<?' VViCE I CAS*^ ^iFtSUff 3t27TKi&^ >^1tl r- A ...a- • »TV^~'— MA>T4M C»i«.T —- - ...y E.C£'VA‘t «i?M ; ■■ " * 'i' - ISyVA.^’-'r^.rrH' Ml<C^ UAM L!:S=^:==r’.-7r=-..--=rr •ygs--aR-^:i:t. Svrr-- 1^1 / U«WT /(pix’rjf^e ; ! 6Y otUMfeX^Yr-^- 4i> i A : ,.-/ \ I'C*) •* \* '>h f ''^i.;-r ;i^:'-'.-A-■ :*t5i6?1--r.•i >^.-ij&i ^■- ■ -fl vi tm V T-: ■ V - ■-•.-A!.A>. A l .;•.: . . . t--- STAU Of1^ DEPARTMENTPHONE NO. 296-7523 1200 VARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 March 11, 1988 Jeanne A. Mabusch Building & Zoning Administrator CITY OP ORONO Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE; APPLICATION #1256 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE APPLICATION #1258 JOHN & KATHY EHLERT, 1785 CONCORDIA STREET APPLICATION #1251 AUDREY SCHULTZ - VACATION OF ROAD Dear Ms. Mabusth: Thank you for sending information for our review on the abovfe referenced permits. Out comments on each application follow. The upgrading and replacemet>t of sewer lines Is mainly a concern of the DNP Lands Bureau. The Division of Waters will have a chance to comment through the Bureau of Lands license procedure. Preliminary indications are that Impacts to protected waters will be minimal because the sewer line Is mostly beneath the existing roadway. W^sv* v ’:.a SiSaiiSSi vA-v-.vr ,'. According to the plans received March 3t 1988t the Ehlerc house addition does not encroach below the 931eO’ elevation. Since the Flood Insurance Rate Map (enclosed) and the City of Orono’s Flood Ordinance consider elevation 931 the 100 year flood elevation, we have no floodplain concerns* (We Creek WSD uses 931.5 as the 100 year flood elevation.) understand howeve^ that the Minnehaha y >-;A The application for vacation of roads along the southeast shore of Forest Lake does not raise any protected waters concerns. Thank you again for the opportunity to review these projects. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. .'.tA.-.-' Sincerely, Tom Hovey Staff Hydrologist METRO REGION DIVISION OF WATERS - . ■■ ■.... V , .. . A-/v, ' . 5St'is4-.'■ "r .: ■■■ ■■■ -r- r •.■••• Enclosure cc: Jack Anderson Jl/dv :■ . ■ ••■ - • •• >:v:\ . . AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P •k-A.AAA-:.. r'A-AV. i: -'A ;a - aah •■.; ■ =-A Biff’S : \ • *mmmm m- • '.m K'm y I MM-Mi 'frv . • 'ii m Su "I ste 5^1 1?'1 . ^v-I.,-4l^->0^^,■,!>:;>, ■■■■:.y: -'...SDS^iI'-m?;■■ ..-it:- m k/ wmmM "1' r<?f T s ::v-i; :-^'i^v:..r-u.;:^ i-W^:^ -;.;- v. cP fr/^'L- /-^I N(^ iS^QV r EX£?T7h n- "c n’_c*' ■V wti“' ^ iWJ- >> / US*1JS i >.%___ idul —- M0’.A Ea^. ef£ ' ■ iJL i ; <rA£*=P '\ Tzr7r^£>ri^-^i^ £X’‘jT.-^ E.ce-VAn*c5M " Lv^MUAKt — :-:r'~ -■ E\/rF k’l . 'A.< •+ H=4« / LIcaWT ! (plxTUP-e »y «WMfc>:-^2-~ i^ ^3A>:- puab)»!./''..'vr» f /I • •'>/ 't it(t tAh litMb. <■ •* ; ^V ^ ff/TfeV.t^r •. V« • • • . \ v| * i^':;I / -.IV • . • -'v.. •’.'' . V lifeisili 7": ;:‘^ r ■ - ^ ' ■I I":-:. :;iP'; 7I77 .■#.:: ./ "■-■ ■' l\ ■■. iv.•■■;■'•• ■x; '/. ' . ' '. *' r 7:; 7 - . •• 1 ;.\ ■ ■ ■:■ ' ■ ■ .■ • '■ ‘ ■• T. -7;v:7r-'7 ■••^•■■V'^ • . ■; •', •; ;mm ^ ■ ■^''^': '77-V'''7'-* :mm-- ■ V :mm*- . ., ' ;■■ •wm..•:,. ;; -7 .' .. ': -7:-;'r/-V ' ■. ■ .. • •.•.• . -.. • . . * . >l:-- PHO^ '■ .■■■■ y- .«. • '.^ •••..’-rrB SSfJmmmm-laK."'1 IIPmM my//-:-■• -.-.^ .. I. uim.:y, •...•msMBM, 2 _Vi lu IL I- .V:V;M ••fa i, ■ I ; '1 L * ■ .i • L I , I 11 :4;v;-'-:': -,i'-i''vO,'ii, c-‘iSS ■-:V •::: •• Vv;,y^;;Sf;;:,-^^ t%£vr.‘v->K -mmm H •6 \w —WpMs A U '3-J 6 il ^ iV- 2^1 ii \ V.Ur i:^ ui; t\;• -*t ^ i * X JiI?. *i»i?^7 l;l5 J^r^i-I i- ii■ V . rnm m -'^3i;(; I iJM*. '•1.-,*' Ti- ;">«4* — ^ ^ 1 L 4 li «a m. p:p:pi y.a ■ -^-l ■ ■ -^i ijA:- Wv-'-'aa :*■• y-.3i;; -i- ■. : -, - .y ;»: a'f Ha;aa^ r 4 . . f-r* ‘ '"^:i .V u'^ / .¥s"; ____1___-r* T^'-'r-"h • i 11 \ ..il----- 'r*"M " ‘..:j Tf :------'■-i-;-------^ ' 1 1 • ' r • 0 »•• "■',a B 1^1?* L-. --------- mrszi -z-rz:==^*' \ ..^* Cvrz ** lJui ill! #r U j: Ut < , wm i^y IS - i I'? : Wi^ : »K „ -7-31:-----7T - r'-4r / ‘ • WM I P-ii* mm-mm.- ■ C'- : ■ •■‘' ‘ y- ;•.=•: y.^'. ...v y ^ *■} ■ '■ - y v . ■ • /7T •■ ■ . ■ -•■•;y ;y;-v y.-:-.-y: 'y^m y..-v; ^ • ■■ ::.V . /;■.. y y-\'.•• .■• W:-. ■ .a •; ■ ••; y.:-.; •-■• y-JA ■'‘lAt^. '■■■■.'• ■■•” '■ i-m. ixm ,y: m:: m^ ■ • V.." /'■ •'=-i<*---0-I.-^h:B" ■ '-"Pf"iiSsS»i ""ntoWlffiw:pFX'X'*:.r ’■. -7;*. ono, Hennepin County^ Lee of Public Hearing d to the attached list set my hand and seal Mz •• V=-<^7 - Wi-. -y^RiS:■*: emm":ip,;|WWm I I' ■■ i,.'a 'rvmm ■v^^:ri ■S’:iW:7 .. ■sMmsm ' 7: V.A -- - ^I I ' -'iW- A X ;'.'••A: / S«te-S5, : I HP-' :;i<j ?-.J?7 ’:. ; . V ... :‘.| . ,AV.X';..'r ..- •■' :'.^..-.?l':r: . ...: ..-.•,''.'. -.' .: ;i... .::-^s wm 7 :."7v;/ •■ V‘^^7X7r.. -:7 .A':A‘)r7t '... 7=^‘' . isai^v ■ ■ . .• f- i .-••:•:■ • :-‘v -.■?n ifc* -. '. • •. • •- •;.• s .yi Vv ' ILV^-r>... ..X..: : > «^axx>".v; W^r *^:7:■XX 7^V>/7A::.:'Vr !*:-: . 7'.7--.-^4ya iTx^X .::i#.: X -; ' ' - ix-. • . .• • ^ •• • _'•■-■• .• . ».: . V- ....XX?:, |xX;XX=:7 >: 7^ 'X xrnXy^xmxAx ismS■ XX II i*xi mjm mm, |XX.7X-.:77:XV-'•^9 J^X ::■'* ^"■’.^^^:4.■:;v *^- -x; ■■■.; •*'- • -•; r.-‘ . •' ^v-XX^U-V xxx™^ r '■• m,i ■ a --‘*^.7.V ‘:-v. ■•Hb'V tv. .........•: ;;--... ■ x>«77 7j7;i:a ^X^vvXX'-- ^x" X X .................... -.r; iv^^«LLXi- if..,- •• .X' X-- •'^■{. .: , 1 . ... •■ . . *.■. . •*•;* ■ y.v .. x"'^; = 7 :i:X::.A7X7- i 2: Vi f ^i vi > 2 VJ Vi (1y-i ^ I n :■'• -A:■ l .:.;••; •*• _.-• — _ \ .:■'•• iX: /•:■>; < " Zk * '■"■•■ ■ ' V:..;;m:-:-;fiA*ax f-Xi.■x-xix«;»::K».;.W..''.' . 4 "I r->7-x 7V r-’ XX.-, /■•■•••rX « o ,v^....'. •-:= - '.1- ■ ...77- .4 .■.>-.: x:7 ^^%|efex-...J ■ :*-f.V.:'";. . f- • '; "' V-7?.V: :. ^X7:X"'7;,_m WXOT- i-V:X'^X' .•^. xX^.---7 mm "-.''/wiv X. . : ' .V. ^ ;■'■■\'7:;;;.*-.^.: .,X 7.77^^ •7?7-x. v.-;i'“-^ -■0.. ..,.XX::..,;v-7X.:X, . -. .:.-;7 ^x:.^*. X--.,--7X|K^v.v....,;X/^ ....... .v ’.;» :..;.,,7,: ...T* ^X:7'XXX'XX xmxj7 7 ' ■7XX.7X -7 .7 ’:-X7-' X> :X7:: J'v-' V. ;■ .7-; .;7 .■•''■■■ .■x 'X sx .a >7.. ■-. :-f7 . •■7 :" ;• ;- ‘. XK7Xir^XXX".7X^'--.f7X::' .■V.;: ' -?;/* ^4iSxMxx^ ■-xifti# XV ,x»K«X; V'ya rnrnmm'f .‘■,7«^?.;V." X'-X '■ , ..:.■;Uii.. - *'■A'^: vXafc^v: : X- A:..-:.#7.XH. . :.M F-. -xV^^x^X’f. .m/iM • Kv " -x.;^■»w P777 ,A...'V ;. :. ...i I 1 it' 7 ■ .--^ ■■• ■ - t • '■ l\ V • > V * .i, «'Safe/ "earlngs in the Council ay, March 21, 1988 on lations: 127 Oak Street, seeks variances to allow Bdywood Road, seeks a ) 250' setback area to jane seeks a side yard addition. >hns Point Road, seeks >osed construction of a 60 Sixth Avenue North, the expansion of the variances for parking fitrol Commission will d variances for land otected area and the :hin neighborhood areas intersection. 85 Concordia Street, riances and a variance I plain for an addition ir at this time. Writ- ailable for review in C^!> ■ • ' ‘V,‘■'fkmmnr - -: ■; 'Vi .'M mt’imwmmfi j iyi-'SK?' ■ ■ 'j- ■* . . ■ ■-' ii= - ~ m'- •■r -Vi ''s-'-': ■'.'' f-'. B! mmm^ KvVtri'S / -Sf' W: ,n'#Wiii v'••*■■.■■ '."■••flB ■-■«.•■-,•vSp ■ ;■•iiif?:'-p-' -ij;■ .*■'■■ .'■• ■/ ' ' T-.'^ '"i.rv;;'•. I- ■ .-.o-.•••Vv, lisii ► ■ •:: •• ■ *■ V ■•::• . .: l.i.- •■ - iS 'ip-' P;-SPPPr1 ■^m :- .ft P-'-VP- B V- :■■;)'■•'''I pp^^ PV.,4.^4.: p Hjiijf'pp''C"i "■ x-ft-: ^'-ft-.P:V' P •.' 4- . ■-■m 4Pi:Pp 'I'liSMi'"-: pPiPP B: R P s ft V ifepp . p.-,-iai■’’■■'■ii*Mi:p-=-' .. .- . -r-' p. -r^v ;.V^^ V^P' P : '. pefvpppl.■ -i •/■ -'• P-:-pp^v^ p--^ PP:>PCERTIFICATE OP MAILINGSTATE OP MINNESOTA ))COUNTI Of HENNEPIN ) 88. CITY OF ORONO ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1258,, was mailed to the attached list of property owners • In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of March, 1988. i^S>r>4 e Bosma E^-. ■jiB’ -■ ' :i£.p^'««lrPp^PpP^11•p ^p>BB-p;Ppp-rpi| :b>. ppp^s, ■ •e' i ^p P-; -Ti.i,' i<pp p^ y I•■”• f.'4 f ftpr ••i.'-v. ■•;■ f; l; :;. -/X ... '{■■^•h'PiiPI'■bs‘«* :.3MS- ;. j« * ■ '■ - - SJ . • ‘.- . s . : «. -•1 MXX,i *1PSM h »■ -I. ; k-'IH:.' iKS^W. P'- ■■■'^■^ t ..V . ."•. : ■■■■■ ". ■ • *y-.: . V--V.'! ,-v lili •• A ■Wxi"V''’m, W ■®l:l Wml -‘: -:x- ¥■ ■• _ ■ ■* ',:v •■• ¥■mi,m -■ V-V-Vv.'- :'A:iTY OF ORCffilO NOTICE1 hold Public Hearings in the CouncJ 1 3wn Road on Monday, March 21, 1988 on land use applications: illiams, Jr., 4127 Oak Street, seeks oa and width variances to allow residence. [•UK Cronen, 2780 Shadywood Road, seeks a ithin the 75' to 250' setback area to age addition. iw3 la, 1397 Orono Lane seeks a side yard I two car rarage addition. iahX, Jr, 1406 t.ohns Point Road, seeks E:n::e for the proposed construction of a [SlfTi :heran Church, 2060 Sixth Avenue North, U!e permit for the expansion of the ture and setback variances for parking :eet yard. PTfP olitan Waste Control Commission will use permits and variances for land tie lakeshore protected area and the ty structures within neighborhood areas y Road 51 and 19 intersection. athy Ehlert, 1785 Concordia Street, tiore setback variances and a variance lent of the flood plain for an addition 3nce. P5I3I3 heard will appear at this time. Writ- d. Plans are available for review in rail*] i:iii i 'A:.^mmSi;m i m 'Mir, 'X,MXr::X4 mm,jmm xXmmr' me ^ ^t-4 m ^ ■■■ ■ i mm "vjv ...XX ■ ‘mm mm■rnmm f ; ; ■y-“m I' },i : ,i. i. : vm ' m“: :m.x : .v' - . - 'v ■ jr'.xxri 4 -Vv-*' r :0xm ‘XiXmiWmxrnxm ,..■ '■•• . • i • ■ = w nX IM • :•. •.\.. .•••• • •• wm ... •■..;• :ju ' ::f ■■■■ • ^ .; ^-. ^=V ;:'i^8siSii?'"’"^^SliW’i &m imm : V 5^: first 1 ood ng 8. £. .sting to fit ng '-6 the which under jiished /er s as tback . ESIGNERS 331 •(612) 474-3291 ^v^ ^ ^ .a : -1 ■ ■-r. ^ -■.'?i® •.:i»:.i i 'i '..\v WiWMMia mm:-i:'A;i -m ;Xv;i::S mm y\::Mm mmtmimm ‘Svl -V ■ •'. .• .^ ■- .■ ■:•'- ■ .' ' • ’ J8*»’»»... .n A » :mi^•....,<^r-- i-;;... •>• •^- .: i'■■■-:•■' ■ .••■•'".fv-':-'Wrnmm..f. ;•'.:=.'W •■-«-'«'i .V- ■' .* ■;''PpS4:-'^ i • y'iV:- 5;.‘ "■' ®^ - ^ »■: ■ -. •:^ ■-ay 'jM'-m Mm-'r ■y i ■'.■hi. ..i ... o O s M H n m 33SS 5S53 in m O *0 O S5*" n -n *m M O m^gq ^ M O 2 01 fA m n» __ X \ti *0 -4 ao S" %§^ M 5 ^ «:b \' ■'-&- > 0» r- -< »- > N Ml Z H ^ e ^ »3 m .-« 2 A -• Z O m X U» Mon m m a M -4 n X M m SM 5 0» ^ f>» ut n» oi 3S U4s 3 r - <> 0> M 5N oi n > mo oJa »-• wi ► in Ui 01 o *- m Q %jss^gs-O n» M rs» >o O) o ■•S o o 04 o o o •« c^ '■■■y:yyyyya;^ M H O aE5i§E^ii z^:23► X z o fc X z o o►-^iIJS'^?3-"iJB’"3 a m a h ► a o X o > m Z 6b a > a > m Z So a ► o ► m 2 Bo a ► N. -< ►► m 2 a o a ► o a 3 a a m o o o 3 aa m o 3 aa m o 3 a a m 04 S’-< o 01^sF X S8 §i a n* M ra E--< 01 5 n **§ 3so M > f’"SSS S-31 2 f- in •- V M *- H r* f1 •-»H OJ Q ^ 0» Z O f!»m g« O f«EJ~ o (01 o H ' <» Es;•< M H n *sa •-4 01 > in i>4 01 •o H a a o w < > 09M rv> o X in »-• > > r- I E88::r- m 2 I r- r- O iMrm 2'■8- m m o n» r- -4 M ro n > > r- o 01 o H *■* 01 a ► « w ► r- ^ 5 ^ in 5 n *8a r»- 5 ► F %i ► r* -< ^ c M M in I- n HOC. E5 -< » ^ in 5 o o S m M M -< in ► m in 04 O) ^ H 8"- o r» ro )»o 0) o -4 •- 'O (. C. O M Q 9 m in •- _ ► 2 ^ a^-B *S2“'Ssa-^ > > s mzr-fni » H 8a rsj M M o 01 o ^ ? 2iSJE::3? -< in C Ni N o u r- in► > o ^-4 n c <- ^ ► S ^ ^ ' 3 ft u O "" •< o c o N O f“ ► — ••H O »• 2S 0»o o ^ I E- Q N a CD o inin 04 o o o zM N M ► am in M m -4 m -4 a ► m r- m H O ►- O ^ g04 o n> M ro ►o in o H fo 0> iS5!:S5 in in 04 01 <3 H 8 m o z HI ► X ^ s o X S ► nssm o 2 M > I rv) 04 a ^P* o o -< m m m O H H ^C.-r.in e 04 ^ 9 oi I ro fO n ►-r <o C o oMI-4 O o o in 2 ^ m nt M 8*^ O ro M IN> ►o O) o H M vl (\ i i am § 5 Om aM X* in 04 in X' o ( ■r ’Ma yir/yTX-y :y ;:;',< --4 , i;CV' ■ ''■ . : ' ■■• .•\ym:]m/sm■■■ ■. ■■;■ ;■ ■. ,:i■-.'■mi mm tMyM ^y^v'-V. .;V, :>a:r mmmt ^ ® •• ■; • ■ :?!• ■; y . ?'H . ■■: . -k ; ",y y-:v-. •-V ■■-iV-*;V-yj.y :>ab:yyv:v: . . . •*: • • . -i • '. . V.;v«|-v-' . J «•.':■■ yi^:Vr-:;; ’■l:'. .. / . ■ mi^-y.H -'j ..■■ /■•• ■.: '.’y': •; ■n|^:- tkyhm- ■'mM ■ y:.r..:..^'^h- V h Mi;’i^Vi;.y-‘. ■Jp- :: ;:-■ ■'. ■■■:■ . .. • i':-' '] y'iy : i 1 •v-:v -y .. .' ;'■ : ■ ■:'■ ■■• I-V p :mm<- , :..y-yv^;: (you must obtain 1-603 Govt Center 3 to each of the ! address labels s as required, i' if any changes separate list of on. .cation. Please ste if the above on is complete te Lon required or ill fees and/or id certifies that best of his/her jtion and further aff» consultants, ises of investiga- days before the ire held on the all scheduled an applicant is »nts to have an tiding S Zoning pRSCRIPTTON OF REQUEST and is located to enhance a blending with the existing garage. HARDSHIP Both the Garage and House 4 ?^®thrixistinamost functionally and sensitively with the conditions. These existing conditions include a - distance between the garage and property line ^ existing house which is within the 75 lake..hore s«“c!;’(from elevation 929.4). The design blend which *. achieved by the proposed additions cause the . iakeshore and sideyard setbaclis to be compromised under current zoning regulations. DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS The existing house location is established flood plain contour, which causes the encroach over the 931.5 contour by extremely long concrete drive adds to the area along with the fact that the existing house as previous?y%^ated is within the 75' Iakeshore setback. ::::: V- \.;-K -m ; ■. "i .■ - .. - 1 l*f. irf ARCHITECTS ■ SPACE PLANNERS « INTERIOR DESIGNERS______ 684 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD • SUITE ONE • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474-3291 a; ':i.i -. ■ ft mi :S‘- ^'-:1 ^ V ■ ■-.g -j •.•;-v:: i :: • A ; 1 based on the following sential character of the Ided onto. Lons: ilong the existing and new lorth wall. snd approval based on the te a view obstruction to sential character of the ast the existing structure. >f excavation and structure dings: ip available to construct property due to increased ncroachment . sards to water supply or all factors of Orono Code ed at 931.5 elevation. tained until permanen, soil 1^.-y- '•‘V jxm - '.•A-' m vS»i«A ^ |;i v;>mmmmm tOKvrir'i;.v'-' '- ^'• 1 jfe^r.4 ■n. "' \ j •\ ••••. ,• •. N ..• - V ■> ' ■¥a«: - a . . • .■•^ .:4u: ra;y.;a- ••*1- ^ ^'■ v; " ■%-‘avv.V:1:^:a^%#-m...V. : %...a ^¥:?aa-aa:s^iiii*wpmwmmi ij Sti, i. .ivt ■ •>3?a- K : I'tSCir-’.H I • !.' ':rw '^1' ■%.■+\' v,a.^';a- a:a'-’v''; a.:' - ■a:;'v.a«M,W-.'a:,^r-L:a-S’-j.:, -‘I*•2'6&■■•>r* ClTlMft^ ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATI' Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) a ifcfS; ■mm PROPERTY LOCATION COH(^a(LOiA U/AV7AT?>/ MW.Site Address CITY OF Dim FINANCE OFFICE n a r/;j;wa;aaa:r'ia:..aa:::^.,o‘SiH>aaa^^a.a I / /"i 'j 'Kn 7^v0/71 yJ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) I III I C ^ Please check one - Property abstract or torrens?mEIPT-THM YOU N063250 cool ROl T03:, QZ'29/OS: mm2 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Phone (home) ^VH-I _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) City; IaW7ATA Zip: wmmM APPLICANT Name .jk»M<s i^Awy i?m«T Address:COUCOPPl'Ar OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home)'■mi Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) 1 (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land ; -I- PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Uf-' « Present Use of Property A^V1(U/ Other (specify) Residential DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^€2/000 Describe request in detail: H- - - - - VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances (_Front Other P^A<N Vl. Side Rear) m^im ■mm:mAmrnm: -v;J;'■ ifcv;:.;' i;-' .I .*. -•* ’• m2- mmmM •-liliSit. -.- RS'"-•, :.-..v'y-r: 4 i m t 1 ing comments: gmcnt of CSAH 6 at this le existing driveway. The rds. ways win require an beginning any construction, cting the west driveway st driveway to accomodate wn Road. way requires an approved This Includes, but Is not rail development, and r utility permit forms. luring construction within gelt. IN COUNTY >rtunlfy employer I . ■> . uSi^U(y-. -v.r. = ■: r\/^ mM:Mz •::■ ■■■.'■.:.v. v -^-•■■■. ' ■■>:" mmi■.■■ ■ .'v't s^iai•■.• virtual—:■• ,-yl '^y'-y r f Wwm:£c . ■.-.■■ -I■i .■''y ■ ■■ ;••■••/■'r ■ '^¥ Prcatz Date: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Thomas J. Jacobs, Senior Building Inspector March 15, 1988 Subject: #1258 John & Kathy Ehlert, 1785 Concordia Street - Conditional Use Permit/Variances - Public Hearing Description of Request - Applicants are proposing to construct an addition with 682 s.f. on the 1st floor and 506 s.f. on the 2nd for a total of 1,188 s.f. of habitable floor space. The applicants are also proposing an addition of 400 s.f. of garage space. To construct the proposed additions, the applicants are requesting the following variances: 1. Lakeshore Setback Variance Required “ 75' Proposed « 71' Variance « 4' or 5% 2. Side Setback Required « 10' Proposed ■ 3.5‘ Variance ■ 6.5' or 65% 3. Hardcover Variance Required “ 0% Existing *» 533.4 Proposed ■ 435 s.f. additional 4. Average Site Line Setback - Lakeshore Applicants will also require a conditional use permit for the following: a) work within 75' of the lakeshore; b) fill within 75' of the lakeshore; c) excavation within the 931.5 elevation — flood plain; and d) construction of a structure within the 931.5 elevation. Pertinent Ordiiumces - Lakeshore Setback — Section 10.55^ Section 10.25^Subdivision 2# Sectin 10.22, Subdivision 1 Side Setback - Section 10.55, Subdivision 6 (B) Hardcover ~ Section 10.25, Subdivision 2, Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Conditional Use Permit - Section 10.55 Average Site Line Setback - Lakeshore - Section 10.25, Subdivision 1^---------—------------------------- —--------------- ^ s:,' yyyk'‘ 'yy y-: ^ i; ■■ v-^ik my myrny : ■ 1 - . iv- \i::S ' • r f .’.... ' I-:-;;-::•: vl.VVs; / ■ - .•• ■ i- i;. ■.i. mm . : ' . f: : •: :\ ’■ .’•itesi::••*••; . •. *4 **Ri- Luthc-ri-'". Lo.ial U36 » e-id Eofback , Vio have ' •Vhe unused tv I'orc to i/C ' mmmMn: mm March 10, 1908 Dear Ms. Mabusth: RE: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins. Minnesota 55343-8468 935-3381 Jeanne A. Mabusth Building i Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 HW'iOB Proposed Site Plan - Trinity Lutheran Church CSAH 6, Opposite Brown Road North Intersection Section 27, Township 118, Range 23 Hennepin County No. 1610 Review and Recommendations ••v.'V..vr.’v i '. i>W- % aS'- I? mm- We reviewed the above site plan and make the following comments: _ No additional right of way required along this segment of CSAH 6 at this time by Hennepin County. - Hennepin County supports the removal of the middle existing driveway. The ditch must be restored to Hennepin County standards. - Any revision to the existing east and west driveways will require an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction. Requirements of this permit wiT, include intersecting the west driveway with CSAH 6 at a right angle and widening the east driveway to accomodate more traffic and to decrease the offset with Brown Road. 'V. V ; :. v ‘i'-'. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. w I-:.'iSpSmx - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, / /T heUJU^ David W. Schmidt, P.E. Transportation Planning 0WS/L0W:1» HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer -1Wsril^MfM ■i- ■■ .: V' . "-v:/:' m-;-v 31# Er.,3.^ P«iil 3; m y':- ;^v3' ^ ■=3.'3-: 3.:; m-Amyym ■• A, TfiArTiV.mmmmm**: vkJ^iter *y-'&:a:l. P£ThomM W PHefWJO. PC.Charles A £r<ksonft. PI WKhjiel C lynch. PC Leo M PawehkyMdt. PE iamrs R MaUnd. PC.Harlan M OJsonn. PE Kannrth P Anderson. PE Susan M. Eberlm•. PI Kean A Bachmarsn. PE Mark R RoJfs. PC Mark A. Serprtann. PE Robert C Russek. A l Arl«. PC Thomas E Angus. PC-J. PE Howard A Sanford. PE. id access locations for the existing 3 acesses. The L require extensive grading :ed indicating final contours sidewalk onto the driving : be revised or eliminated. fice. 3 • 612-6J S-4600 i;.:" >; -:j4iP®' :ilRi ' ' '-••'■il F '"*■i in Mf ’i ’■ 14m:m V^:-S p r - ■ - • : V, c • ■. 7:-,.;. ^i» ?«;•■ : : ;■• •>. v^.v-:.. ■••,--;'v :*• =;•’•• v- :■■ g.: ■n ., mmmM - P' Im ■ LifeV . ..v;'Uyyyyi -lyypilll^; .•V: r.'«•••.>,«. :»1F rtiiii -¥;;;:& afTS (ftp li ^ ? e-v Wi-m-y:- R8»imm M Tsant ? -“i::: a-•If’rch ly-^-.1. • 7 ; '! 7 "i*, ys ’vr.is IgT-tts^r.j -lrm".‘?r Tr: Ji7>rort«'' ti I^err^'tr.oat :ienne;.in C:ur.ty ;jiO ./ashin^-ton -iv:>nue^ .;c;'.:i;-!:, I .imesotu, 3:343 I>e ix IXm Il^’-ttson: r.’.is is ir. rryxri to the application of -.. c vV ^‘*y^''*Iv=»*ue liorth', Crono, for \ cor.iitioaal use ^ existir-c church structure tuid setbacs v-^-iI^.ces ‘ior pc-.r7J.;v: cr.d chui-h oi:,r. in street yard. ^ .--oi.-‘-d not to Icnate c^r vn-do ’-iyins :ee c'.mersaip -g*a ri.ht-cf-vny of Oi.dI 5 on the north side cf the county ror.c .o frinity LutV.eron 'JV.ru^ch. i aren di.v.i:;chi cc: Cohn lur.dcuist Co^:■'Jr.•i Ir.hucth v'd- “Pj •:-p- >; ; ,:v:::P77V^v-'?7i^3■P’K‘7;7X ■•■’. •:.• ;. . /-p-: ■>•;. y-..: ;7>;v - :5v :vxr:- : ^.'1yyym smem If^. f ' • -A "..: ■• . .•,•■ • 1^. r:'.* m: mmM -y r ' ■.■■>>:-, •. ■./ ■■■■. ih:| A rr:.-■ ■■ ■ i: * '-' .■•*.• ’ ■' ■'•.'.'■■■7 - 1..'4 . A 0-1 y -iw"" "1my-..15.•:■.•■'-■.J \ •f. V .1 •s m- E^l Hi Kfe: -&.-*a»sWK»'Sli- '' ■'Vv ..vVv V :-:;;;iv-4iaiht‘;^ ^/;y-, V. . ,• : . .mm I"-*: mm, H-. hmmmmt-v;:- ;?ii« . *. ..-. :• «** •• .•• s: • ■:Bones troo Rosene Anderfik & Associates Ono Q Bone«foa ^C. toDen W *o»me.JOItp^ C AfH«?fUfc. PE Bfmttford A LiHTttj^rg. PE ihcn»f<J E Turn^f, Pf Jsfne^ C O«4on. PI G»enn R Coo*. PE Thom#) B Noyei. Pi Robert G Stt'iiHirN PE Ml»rv*n I SofvaU. PE njtnn A Go*<^. PI RiCtiRfd W Power. PE Don«i<f C Rur^ardt. PE Jerry A Bourdon, PE Marl! A H«mon. PE V.i K ftekj. PE M«n*er T Rautmann. PI Robert R Pfetferie. PI OavHf O LotfcoiA. PE TV k>a«Rs W Pwerton. PE MicAaei C lynctt. PE Jamei R M»t«ryf. PE Kennftb P Arvfenon. Pf Kr«t> A Bartwnann. PE Mane R Rottv PI Robert C Ruswk. AI A TlKHnas I Angm PE KicMMwd A SardOid. Pf Chants A mction leo M Paiwetsiiy Harlan M Otion Susan M Ebenm Marti A Seip Engineers A ArcMtects March 7, 1988 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 r? r \ •• k . WR-81988 I.. In iiii' Attn: Ma. Jeanne Mabusth Re: Application No. 1255 - Trinity Lutheran Church Our File No, t?9-1255 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the plans for the parking area and access locations for the Trinity Lutheran Church improvements. The plan provides for the elimination of 1 of the existing 3 acesses. The remaining accesses meel our approval. The extension of the parking lot to the north will require extensive grading work. We recommend that a grading plan be submitted indicating final contours for that area. The drop off/turn arouud created by extending the sidewalk onto the driving surface creates a driving hazard. We recommend it be revised or eliminated. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Michael C. Lynch MCL:df 8179f 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-6; >>-4600 piiiPH- i;<< ■■ ’' 4m - ; v-'■ - :R "y-y’^mw, mm %-mw:m mm fmm Pi 1 ■W ■'■««•«:v: .'.;t :. .-:^v<y^.< c:-v -. *;;^x'vyvt- Vr v; ■•■ » .r.■ . „•. V ■: V V5-- . ;;l i ^■■*wmg:::r pv’ -■ Vyt'V :;v: . mM;m . •. •,• •• .: .'•. ••.:r> i - ■ i: wuy v::- .-.;■ A- w*a b - ^ v r - ^}Si '5C: ^y::i : • .J CERTIFICATE OF IfAILlilGSTATE OP MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OP ORONO ) SS. ) I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of «1254; was mailed to the attached list property owners • In witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of March, 1988. Bosnia srrrTT M XCy -^ -wmv. ■ ■b,V: ■ .--b M mmwmm ... b.V-'-y/b K-.b^:"bv'::bv .;■;■:•; ’V, -i'b■•;":’■• •' ;|. '.. . ' -.. ..■.. ■•■..>■ . ■ .-i- :;v': v :bb' ‘ t‘r MfS®?, . 4v i ^y^¥T '■m mil h *r ■r-;Hg/.■' ■ ■ ■ •..^ -A'-VSf?■ ■■ 3-.' ■. -■■;-■ 2w' *’ '5A/;. - . v;’ -:As ,-V ..; ■■•.'r-: .. . -■ v: -.'"v •.:■■•**u fel“ • t £>•. •• »... . « ’ «*. -. r . ..^ ' - S « • mv;;-■ . I : :v: ^ \ w 190 •r\ ? - 5. ^ I ^mm V#; ’K|' K3;v ii G *JIAK V‘- Ki m'SA}"' ’ r 3 3- :3 . 3 ; . 3 - , : .. ;:3-2:ri.:¥c: 3; .. ••• .3 mvm: ■■■'.mm'. 3 . :p, ; .; mm':--. ■:'• ■■ <■: ' ■: : m m • :■ :V. • =-’i» mm. -y.■ 'Vly0i k •■• ' >* •'* :>'■; >■mmms ''1 K;i;-v??®K-'^ ,-aWm mmm M' . - ' ■ rm^ml ' V. ': • ••••:■••• 3 :•■■!■■ '■ .3' 3; 3 -'r;-'- ■•:> \ A:V 3:'V:. :3.:: v ;•:; * ■■-.<•• i . .■••■r . . . .3^ : - V :. L ,^/v • • ;^* ^-wmsArnmv:^- h.. . /.--rv. r- i;r::::;«*>l|: . ■ ;.:s.:."- . • •m.- :i ... ;2 ?.:.-. 'f... V 3? ^■ ■^' A.'..•. 2v-.> •••;..;3:-3. ■;.: ,; ■ . . , ■•.:••,. ; •:■.'v; - :’^v-< m -3^M3*Li3 CITY OF OROHO ■OTICB The Planning Commission will hold Public Hearings in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday* March 21* 1988 on the matter of the following land use applications: 1 - #1248 Thomas R. williams* Jr.* 4127 Oak Street* seeks renewal of lot area and width variances to allow construction of a new residence. 2 *- #1249 Daniel W. Cronen* 2783 Shadywood Road* seeks a hardcover variance within the 75' to 250* setback area to allow a three car garage addition. 3 - #1250 Dana M. Wells* 1397 Orono Lane seeks a side yard setback variance for a two car garage addition. 4 - #1253 B. John Lindahl* Jr* 1406 Bohns Point Road* seeks a street setback variance for the proposed construction of a detached garage. (5X #1254 Trinity Lurtheran Church* 2060 Sixth Avenue North* V^Ceks a conditional use permit for the expansion of the existing church structure and setback variances for parking and church sign in street yard. 6 ~ #1256 The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission will require conditional use permits and variances for land alteration within the lakeshore protected area and ho installation of utility structures within neighborhot ■' areas adjacent to the County Road 51 and 19 intersection. 7 - #1258 John and Kathy Ehlert* 1785 Concordia Street* seeks side and lakeshore setback variances and a variance for a 5 foot encroachment of the flood plain for an addition to the existing residence. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Writ­ ten comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices. City of Orono By: Planning Commission J^^ne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of March 7* 1988 > 2.,v,;3v:-ii ■■ 3'^ ■ '.,i iitiiiii- * ■ ^3 3! .'3 '- 3 2' ; A.' mm mi ■ ■ -mmmm .' iv' A" m"'I mm\\ V •- >iM-3-:3 223:,. Ittt; c mmm^m:4 ' 3V-- ■ 2v.>:.v.3- '■•■'A --'f.-is wmm X 'f-:m ••3 3'A v M ,3: ^iT;; '.i-; mexu. , V:3--■ 3,4;. CO>nXoo im tJ Mz iim 3D M M Ifl H H Ms U) w Hm 3 m SiSm • •oM ^ irf o mm^■«*■ Vi.‘■S’'- •.»a li %■ - K>-»- ■'-" ^;.- . M:: r:..V, ; .'•? ry;- ••..•.,y.C:Vw - '■^ m&mh:M 7-. ■■ .’■;/ :®fffS:S:S« snssStefea: ‘4-:lf^7 ■',!fes* !?‘-’:'.^.^r^'-j r:v: -^. -'yaai-,.iE.y•■ ..•.. .l^' "■ ; J■iyil/ . ‘ * ’-M * * ■Vp.v.'.-\.vypy' yy-ii-:-;:..,j7;y ' vVl.•’y.''-’y::y;.-; .■'-S'NlK Wmi •*jL. -ic. ^ \^=y:>j^:y r -mmm^.WiWi^iyi. >;y• y ■::ra";**y'- •; ’v::;y.::y :^:mzm ^■■7y:'P::Y^^^ /"■yr'yyyvy- ; v,; :--:.";.y>;/. :t-^m J / : •'■ • r>l^ '• - . *■ .rf ' ‘ I mmY y ■■ m:7M ■y.yy-j >y V.-: ., ■; ;-,. 't • •.! .- ■^. : •:.=. y' 4: »iyt. L-:; frv.?--: BP .•P; •; ; ^ . .; : : ■;: '. , ■ V '. ^ . • kv’.. .' ^- -r!. .-•■■■.■> y .' 'y.y.'7 -_ .y ■:■ t.g.".-••••»^/.; =• .' = ..• • • :. r.y^- ■.*': ■ rr :•_ ' ■ -:V H^^;:;=-;v'". y- Ti-i iip mmi-.l; I. ■ r 'v-.y .yv.'jv'. %Lt/- - . .■:v. •.■••: •■■:y y ?•:•■ ?y^;-vv • .'■■■■ ;■••••■ ysritry'-y.I: A ;:^ >y.y :, ; my^777>:m4^7Y7::77::mgM ’•'- y.:'* ' • -vv ■>: '.* i -V »;yy^■- ■’•-yyy ■ '7 ^ Y'7-7-: : 'W7^m 1; . : • , ' y |-P. ^ .- .fy';-’PV.-.•" ■■• t ■■ ■ ' ■P>y,yyifyy ■■ : i-yy-yyyiyy^ A1 tei th< Cil By a 3iTi TBX)i Sm C9►OX X}soot>»a5m M O 04 » fM o» M O SSr> V Is?fVJ 045 55S2mo Z o o fV> Mfi 0 ao o ^ H M ro 0» C S 04» > ut N □» ^ } l» O (/) ^ M (P P <X I <t5>.04 cSS" ► - r- m Z o H H o H 01> r-g XI XI O 04 M ►- Oo o o X sD > M 01 M S3 M O X 1 H* ►-* °SS5 •» X Q I"^iss ••an 04 X a *-smz N Z o N M O o 2§ XM O o 04 Xm im*o MZ s S3 H O K TJ m Q ^1:3 CS 52 HM § O) U) Hm 3 XJm 3 5om soH ■oM 04 04vn o ’M-V ■:• 'lit- '• • ■ •' ^ ^ • ' '■'■■• mm ■■MM ■■'' .: ■ 'V^'. •' ■■'•••■■••'■-i.;.i . ;V//?-'..V I: ::.:Sysyy-' ■■:. -■m- ' \ : *-■ ••--1 ^•■' -/‘‘V ^ S^s * - - • -• :/•■••••• -:’- *.'r:. ;j,’ .. .'^i ■• i._ ■ - •■-■ 1 m.i• A -■ •■'; ..-:^ ■ '^v " ■■mmimm mim V -■ * ■■. •■ ■■ ■ :• K. fay^- v"> ■ ;iili¥ ■iii ,••' • . V .-.^ ; n ;,;-v;.-f^:2 :.- . , .•-. - :.v: -v\.lj '.A m • i-:mF* ."•, ••'• •*•* i. M '4. .■■■■■ ••//V : fes®: berth. :J,; ■.:;t-,v'M •••••?.'.V '■!. V : v4'-4' ; rr; - 4 = '!>'A */4 |»ii ■mu fmm ::' '*-■■'^•'V ■;;;./4::V^V -mm••-:•/ . . f V...;4!, :•«1BiliH J- :-v. «.-'4 l.y y ::y ^<mrnm y'-^yyy-'y ' . .' ■ *:'■ • iSfe^*-:-: Wiii my-v: ■ =.i -V mm ■■^mi i-.yyy^r] yy^ :-■ '%iyy K, V> 4 ■'.■■'•■ :4”’ ''4.. ' . ■: : ■ ■VA''■ wmmu ••^;-e7'--:/v :.A ': rnymim. :> A .A-A- s7;;':'::-a 9Sn^9Bi^^lt^V'*' ' '*Ppffl ' 'J «?jii6A 4:; . fi»4:l&l; 1 V •-v4-4¥..««; ■* ■ AvflH J mCITY O? ORONO - GENERAL LAND DSB PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address on^n Sixth Avpmio North viS'i i'V^ 4( Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)CITY OF CRM) FINANCE OFFICE Please check one - Property ^ abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only) torrei>5?^200005 Cl GEN 150.00 71 150.00 mmt Please attach legal description to application if not incluus|jpppp^_^^. on required survey. _______________________________fOiJjg^? CCOJ l^ppy^l’^j^iyy Phone (home) 0^/2A/^ ^*73-8577 ^C.iSSVS'Name Trinity Lutheran Church Phone (work) Address 2060 sixth Avenue North __________ City ^‘ ^ ‘______ Zip ^ OmiBR (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone _ _ mmMm Address _ City Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do-) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land ■■■'V ; 4 '■ yy:myyy:^m:y':y FEES - CONDITIONAL OSB PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fe© ^y.y $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 $150.00 $250.00 $200.00 b) c) d) f) Institutional (church, school, etc.) Duplex Credit/Bldg Commercial/Industrial Use Land Alteration Grading and filling ~ designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or n>or« Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation _ . .. . , $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning __ _ _ $100.00 Appeals - _ _ _ _ Other - see fee schedule : • ‘iSM, - 44WK ■n. ri 4'4 ' '■l 'ymi P'AAi^A rking variance sased on the essential character of the ental to the public health, njurious to properties or s residential zone are for , ■- ■ ■ ^ ■■:■■.•■ ■ ■^ •=./ •■■ •■•,;; St lot line to screen h Brown Road. al site plan review based n is not detrimental to the r materially injurious toy» r materials. et the requirements of the jroperties. !d. tlons; from lot line not to exceed ? east lot line, construction where needed, re) per State Building Code. s lanes. ;Vr V;.:- V .pWiiis M'ft-.... ■' m ft?-?:? •j: !iaiilM yl ■ Lftj.:;.Aft: 5--“ .. ;-ii••■.': I . •; .•' i: ■i-7-»=•r. ■ ^ creening the parking ast lot line to also to be removed and permit based on the s in accord with the i of the district in pal Plan. >e and the proposed ntained would not be fare, or materially rinlty. ' with each of the srty. The use is a act to the following i, may be granted for I such conditions as .n effect as long as 3ut nothing in this or amending official uses. ermit shall be filed les of the county or for record. The .1 description of the liOTKiS'? ^KiiSS __ *.•1^ :•/ ^]A": :’if•' ■:: ’ iE3l ^ - •■ ./i • .; • . ^. .i • • . '..; .-.n Zoning Pile #1254 March 11, 3988 Page 6 of 7 follotinffi^dlJgsf""" approval of the parking variance oased on the locality.alter the essential character of the safety*" and“we\”fare?“ir mate^^la^l 1 y^Tn"i*'“\ public health,improvements in > .e vicinity. injurious to properties or dwelll"ng u^its.*"^*^® Parking in this residential zone are for Approval is conditioned on the following; r4sidential^property.^®''®‘^ line to screen the 2. The driveway access line up with North Brown Road. 3. No other variances are required. the folloii^gr*™"®"'^® approval of the commercial site plan review based on public® he7l?h,®^sVfe^^^^^ is not detrimental to the propeicies or improvements in the vicinit^. injurious to .'. Building materials conform to existing materials. Zoning Code'. ^“nii parking meet the requirements of the 4. Drainage will not affect neighboring properties. 5. Access to the property will be Improved. Approval Is subject to the following conditions, S' In'helght.’'^''^"'^ l°=®‘ing It 5- from lot line not to exceed 2. Provide screening tor parking lot along east lot line. 3. Provide soil erosion contol throughout construction where needed. SpecUl''fire'Mpp?esLirsJstems.°'’'''" Building Code. 5. Drop off areas to be designated as fire lanes. Wm§wmMPj-Vv :•;••■:::\0: fm fimik ;. • 1 .\. t,. • • . ' I ' ■ ' m [»:•••..•••;. *• N. • ■ ■ • 1 r i-'. "'m LJVvA,: **. V; ■"'■ k®-; w- : ■■ ■ ". 'd".. ' ,. • i ‘ ■ •* '. *• •’ ■■ • • ’.•: - - ■ • . ' • ' .' • . r--. 't' ••;' ■ ■ . ■ ' -v; _■ ■.. - • =. '. • .••■ ./■•• A,.-. :..•'--V-• '. 'Ir-W’. 't:!.:'V -; itirv/svl-. .v^Vv .A^'^^ -ySsIwSw • m P’-;;f4'*‘ji.^*>' <: ■ proposed. Orono Zoning as follows: cts and therefore do not t create a hazard to the d Is as follows: one or the sanctuary is 378 paces required 2ts the minimum number access point to loading s 20 future spaces. Of paving. Curbing must be le. and wood. This conforms Eire suppression systems ture with an automatic Lane posting should exist location (not determined id, but is expected to be this addition. Unless (equate for all potential e or replacement of that jave to be submitted and permit for the building mmB ' A'AAyA-A ;««»; ■ t-Smmrni : 5 i ■iijf ii*. { -•■ J p' ' • •' ■'*** JP''L'sy mBMmm mmmf teiKii tmMAr 1.'■If SS--;r ">•■* y *' ■ » *wm.ra:;L. i.•■.•i. •• •• V - ••• 1 ' ■M k • •;■ V - ■ '.V^•l•-•.v V ■■':r * HA- yymmii M ■•■ ■ i'.r . AAA^yAAHmmP:: >?:■• ■' 'A 'L:v ^ AAsm '. -ty ..yj:y m§.i mm yA'jAyy'] >?v • " Zoning File #1254 March 11, 1988 Page 5 of 7Landscaping Plans (Exhibit P) - Landscaping is shown along the front of the lot screening the parking lot. Screening/landscaping should be added along the east lot line to also screen parking lot. The abandoned access is shown to be removed and sodded. Staff Reconoiendation - Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit based on the following findings: 1. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and Comprehensive Municipal Plan. 2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the pubic health, safety or welfare, or materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code. 4. The church is an existing use on the property. The use is a permitted use with a conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: a) A conditional use permit may be revokable, may be granted for a limited time, or may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. b) A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this Section shall prevent the City from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. c) A certified copy of any conditional use permit shall be filed with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles of the county or counties in which the City is located for record. The conditional use permit shall include the legal description of the property included. ii>^ ■>?<•.- Vv'■•■:,.• •••- . Engineer and Minnehaha :e there Is no change in additional parking lot. iroughout the project, lot to the west must be lose o£ the M.W.C.C. , Subdivision 16 pin County Department of y. The only comment was Brown Road (see Exhibit ewed by the City Engineer h will require extensive ing plan be submitted tig the sidewalk onto the » recommend it be revised Dne with grading permits There has been an attempt ail. This sign must be erty line, and not exceed .v-;'"‘ ~ till Mill " 7 iiii•'. ;.. ;s. . ...,.... -v • ji^. y'’ ■•• ■*. ’* ..♦ '= '••;•. • • -..■'-I ■.'■'■■-• -Vi ■■■■'¥ -v . >v mM »w «y -v:rA^ iy iiiJigSi|.v' -'-x’' .y y0-;:^y:>Ay A:'A:;:-: mm hi 'i: K •;^= : >r- -. r;- * mm ■;. "■' rU--:. - ■ ■ Parking (Exhibit E) - Section 10.60, Subdivision 4 A variance will be needed to allow parking as proposed. Orono Zoning Code Section 10.60, Subdivision 5 requires setbacks as follows: Required 10* • 50* Variance or .05% or 74% The setbacks required above are for R Districts and therefore do not relate to a church. The proposed parking does not create a hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public. The formula for the number of spaces required is as follows: one space per 4 seats in assembly area. Occupant load for the sanctuary is 378 occupants, thus parking must be provided as follows: 378 occupants/4 seats per space « 94.5 or 95 spaces required Shown on the plan is 176 spaces which meets the minimum number required. On space should be eliminated at the access point to loading berth, therefore 175 spaces will be provided plus 20 future spaces. Of these 175 spaces, 4 must be handicapped spaces. The surface of parking area will be asphalt paving. Curbing must be provided on the east parking area along the lot line. Building Materials and Building Plans (Exhibit I) - The type of material will consist of stucco and wood. This conforms to the existing materials used. Building Code Review - Preliminary - Per State Building Code 1305.6905, special fire suppression systems must be provided throughout the entire structure with an automatic sprinkler system for fire protection. Fire Code Review - Access through parking is acceptable. Fire lane posting should exist at drop off areas and fire department connection location (not determined yet). Septic System - . i»e existing septic system is not documented, but is expected to be found as substandard in size and design for this addition. Unless applicant can prove that the existing system is adequate for all potential anticipated use, we would require a total upgrade or replacement of that system. Soil testing and system design would have to be submitted and approved by the City prior to issuance of any permit for the building additions. ■•nV ■ : ry- •• vv:.-:X.' ijfs .. } . . • . •.y •AAi-./A- ' . . •• • .u»' : • •• . .y-’-yy ■xM r»4f *•' 1- i*: i:-f',,X V. ,1.-: • ■/■y : A:.- V-\.il •x::;/ :V:0,y;--yxMm F. ...mtructed at the following and an approximate 35x28' roposed. .28, Subdivision 3 (A) - ses. f but has not received a a permitted use with a leets the requirements of iting a conditional use may want to provide day- : application and would Council for an expansion Meets Required Meets Required 110' 165' 145* 230 Meets Required Meets Required Meets Required Meets Required lot line (Exhibit F) as It will also have to be rrier from the residential 1 approved by the Planning •• V '‘jiiISIBE:: Zoning File #1254 March 11, 1988 Page 3 of 7 ■i■■‘•'.■Ki-'i:..,';■ -vVoH:-vi.fc7 : ' ■ o/. i[i-Drainage - Section 10.60, Subdivision 15The drainage has been reviewed by the City Engineer and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The M.W.C.C. has reviewed the project and since there is no change in the direction of drainage and very little change in additional parking lot, they will approve it with the following comments: 1. Soil erosion control will be maintained throughout the project 2. Any future construction of the parking lot to the west must be submitted to M.W.C.C. for approval. The City Engineer's comments are similar to those of the M.W.C.C. Traffic Control/Access (Exhibit E) - Section 10.60, Subdivision 16 Review of the two access points by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation Department was looked upon favorably. The only comment was that the east access must be lined up with North Brown Road (see Exhibit L). Traffic flow within the parking lots was reviewed by the City Engineer (Exhibit J) with the following comments; The extension of the parking lot to the north will require extensive grading work. We recommend that a grading plan be submitted indicating final contours for that area. The drop off/turn around created by extending the sidewalk onto the driving surface creates a driving hazard. We recommend it be revised or eliminated. The extension of the parking lot has been done with grading permits from the City and the contours shown are final. Signs - Section 10.60, Subdivision 1 Existing sign is located over the lot line. There has been an attempt to acquire more property in this area to no avail. This sign must be relocated on the church property, 5' from the property line, and not exceed 8' in height above grade. mmwmmm 4 I-.,., .' Hoi ■ r- ■ o -f V .. o- ■ , . -■■■:,■ '.H.i. .. 44. ,V . r • fi. • *. fr . ’. ii my' ;■ ^ ii-.'. - . . r ■ : :-.V ... • . V y\' ' y'm-m 4- :Y-y 77. X-y; A-V r.7^*swii nmmy ■■ ' ■ j ■ y ^ • V.O •:: yMiM ••••V ^■T •r;■s\r yi ■’ ■ -fi:rV'V - ■:or:h Avenue North Jse Permit - lepln County DOT Section 10.20, Subd 2 (B) Subdivision 6 vision 4 (A) )proximately 15,751 s.f. e a total of 27,185 t».f. }wing areas: H'-^V ■'■■■■ ■m•'i. '.':■ '■■■ A-- p'r.' :.:j. .:■:AW:-:&y l&C-m .=.-:• ■••• jfji i ■ % '•■ ■■v ;.V'■'y^A y--yiAia'.pp' •=. lli telill ■* '■,r -, •> * L : > « 'iJ' VP-;""":- iiKWj-ia KS LZoning File #1254 March 11, 1988 Page 2 of 1The additions to the structure will be constructed at the following areas:1. West end - 12x47* addition is proposed.2. North end - court yard will be filled in and an approximate 35x28 addition is proposed, 3. East and south - concrete sidewalks are proposed. Conditional Use Permit - Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 (A) - refers to R-lA District - pennitted conditional uses. The church is an existing use on the property but has not received a conditional use permit. This type of use is a permitted use with a conditional use permit in a residential zone and meets the requirements of Zoning Code Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 - granting a conditional use permit. Applicant has stated that in the future they may want to provide day­ care facilities. This is not included in this application and would require review by the Planning Commission and the Council for an expansion to a conditional use permit. ercial Site Plan Review - 1. Performance Standards - Section 10.60 2. RR-IB District - Section 10.28 Zoning District - RR-IB Requited Existing Proposed Area Lot Width Setbacks-Bldg Front Rear West Side East Side 2 acre minimum 200 ft minimum 4.4 acres 550 feet Meets Required Meets Required 110* 165* 145* 230* 110* 165* 145* 230* Meets Required Meets Required Meets Required Meets Required Screening - Section 10.60, Subdivision 10 Screening has been provided along front lot line (Exhibit F) as required by the above Zoning Code Section. It will also have to be provided along the east lot line to provide a barrier from the residential zone. This barrier must be a fence or plantings approved by the Planning Commission and Council. ..fy . . : *. iii.« . r • .* • • •. . • • . • • r:-: :. :<.• :■-V-"a ■"•:■•■■■vf y 'V ;v ,-ry:vV--V -'■:-ifimmy ..r : V ■V •; =%■':'•/■ > **. -r’ •V \ “T / v... \ .y- X..4^ ;:' ‘■"’s'«S5;jK*!:S:fS3SSf ‘ i'V- <P.i::-:. ::- •• -• - ••, . ••--•;• .-0V^0.:4--.v; «::;!-<:^-,/:-- « •*«« ■-■ v^.^.y:^Vp; Vw '-; ’ • y V'-ti^ i®ilf :;:: :::y ^ Sa4aif'.-v , ■■^: -1. Kli \ \ -. Va^, -"'•_ - •■^ —=.— '•. -V -A » X: # ■'.r;; ^•.r- V « ,i«i%iji4iSi -'-'aiA ■»' ov- .■•.,.:::y^;^y^. . - ;.:;<'r-;-; .-.:"r.-?3 Kvv..„,,yy:5yv;.,.;..vsy:;..^^ ■ - Aryy#vryf;>.:,:y,.y:y^^ A'^y:r ■ =^^l=To;Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Conunission Members City Administrator BernhardsonThomas J. Jacobs^ Senior Building InspectorMarch 11, 1988 #1254 Trinity Lutheran Church, 2060 Sixth Avenue North Commercial Site Plan Review/Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Application Property Owners List Plat Map Notice of Public Hearing Proposed Site Plan Proposed Landscape Plan Proposed Floor Plans Floor Plan - Sanctuary Proposed Elevations City Engineer's Report Letter From Karen Ziminski to Hennepin County DOT Letter From Hennepin County DOT List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E ~ Exhlbit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Related Code Sections - 1. Commercial Site Plan a) Performance Standards - Section 10.60 b) RR-lB Standards - Section 10.28 2. Conditional Use Permit a) Permitted Uses - Section 10.28, Subd 2 & Section 10.20, Subd 2 b) RR-lB Standards - Section 10.28 c) Granting Conditional Use - Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 3. Variance - Parking Lot Setbacks a) Parking R Districts - Section 10.60, Subdivision 4 (A) Proposed Required Side 9.5' 10' Front 13' 50' Variance .5 or .05% 37' or 74% Applicant's Request - Applicant has an existing structure with approximately 15,751 s.f and is proposing to add 11,434 s.f. which will give a total of 27,18 d s.f The additional square footage will add to the following areas; 1. Worship area 2. Classroom space 3. Narthex/lobby area f:-yy-y-y^yy yyy::/"yy**-' ■ ''-■..'.■'■ ': •'’■::' y y yy\-v'..• • ": »• ymy ■ y.i-'-^■ ■■• •; V ■■'y. ..,y.-= '*’,; ..y.A” . yyiyyy,.t. :yyys#yi4*^-: y "■■‘■■■i--' '^.- ‘=;PIftr:vj;, •■• ; HHKSi'fS,;I .;' -‘.iy - ■-y-y ■■ ' .-v ' ■ }■■m'-y li:-:;v’v\^.-fy-imm-mmli^yrywRy:: 1'^-. '••■f\. ■ ■■’. ■-» *■ ■■ Wm yyysrSy-: - ■/. i* : y-yyyuyyy-m^ py:.'■ y- y.v ' V^ :s y'^^- ;• f: Vii-v^’y- *'"“lL ' TT'^^-'wiilil 1«: isy -yrntiym ' y y^m R- "■■i.''3'';:i-'i;- m-y'yyy^^^; - V/’y T;: , jA--:y^ 3y:y;y’yyt yyy-s-yy,y'’‘*y-; ^-.y■yy^ ■ ■'■■. ysyj.myiM ' ■ ■::yy;ye'?:y:¥0l^mymy->:yyyyy^:..y-0 wMyy-ymrnyy ■ .-' ■■ '■• ■ ;i':-mm y yyt y. y j’:,..:=;-•?...; • jia: ■. .., f;- '•■V,yy:y>‘ :-\'> y.. y - y y yyyy.-:'- •:’i- .'.'; • *. ••. • ^ . *! V yym 'v^ ; ' .y«v* :3;^^'yi!fe;.;yyyy/; yy,;*y^; y^yy -"""y y “ ym ii^ till y: y . ■-hfsMyy - y. ■ - ■•;' yy>i ilillMm/yyymrni FTy.">vv^..,',-; ■ -. :^y-,yy yy .-. ■' ■ ■■ •• . >■ • yyyy-yy^-;: - '■■•:•■ y yy ■■ |y ' - V.- -.■.,■:■•/■ V. \ yi.:y-y‘y; yip ■■^ V • V ■■•ji myyy^‘'y y-w- yy^y-': r- /.:v:y..y;:vyv;.yy .y;<:V’.:-:--:v:^'v yy.y^y;-y - • :;• :-v.• -yy [y ^. /.S - r^-vv ■ ■<' ■■■ • •• :y<:.. y 'j'y- .:■ ;■• ••• -r •••.'J:-V y ■ :y-rtiy i:- ■y'^- •v-iyy* P;y« ' .. . ■ ■ V .r.i yy-iM^" Ea*\3/' /■ ‘y-.:. yvriir?^ A-^yy?« -M- / ; CK .... ZB,^* <•0 N »;; X 20 5-0' n of a survoy of the torod Laiui Survey No. loccicic»n i»f all of a proposed buildinn. B. . . , ':a , . ,, -V: ii-tr " pmmafsw^tossamsssiBKMs: itmsSPP .A; ■ ■ wm ■' V •/ yWMM&mM Kf ..: •; ^■; •.' •... • -x ; :; ••. ♦‘■. • ■■•m:,:- ^ ■ •• i •: •■- • r , ......... • ■•- - ;:;'-:V.-..V.-u: • *'-"''j 5^;•. -’ - '• ! '■-• • . •• ' ■■■; ■ ' . y" .' ■' : ■ 'v ■ . :■•/•-:: -^ ,:.•■■ ■ ," ■ •’* - ‘ • • • • . -j ■: •; ;.. •■ :... •■:: . - •.■.■■;■■■'■'f-'': ■. ';■ ' ■■ ■% : ■; / ^ i "'■ ■■'/ ■ < ■1V 1 1 1 i"C S r> 1 \3 '''^-'*»- 1 f C‘t C-.njfy 1 COf ^ 1 n T L r ^ J I” .:-.:..-=^-, i.--. it. , =-v-> VV^; ^ , T;; V.-. Jli^■ : n i :|H riv,..;K-/ /:•: ■■•'M-:. S?a.'V.; :^v ^^3^' mmm•^aa:!- V S- l' ir-^.:M m-^1..•3 ^;- 3 , . ' . ■•.-.a:-'■' '••a/•■ .-■ ;■■■•••' • .'■•■:?•■ 'a-a'--";''-^aa'-xi^^sBi A^ai;'- Vmm ^Qastiipi # i O QW „L ‘‘-3 O •Jm. /oo*T7«0 o/a*£. 6r.*ACC, TWK. K ^r/W. /w«os«/> A --a /V«« C.^r , fh^jUrrST?^ > TTre- ^,7>A*vi-r>^ Y i/j>*^fijU ^#C7 Onti/C., , aSc -£.x//7>^ /^.vci^T// ^ tf/ -AiC-tX !t^ ovi- AP. ^ •?y<pt« ^ \i»Si^'CV kiVlifirririciiv^Xo c-t.»'ii<-jus ”7^ /K:,tt-,f».'C'^ w J StOjpfc-^ /t£A^9 “TO ^ '~rrfQ^ p«.opfe/^^W ^ I *is *v ;u.a5,-r«.t^ TO RrJoc^~TL- o( |-p^ prtopA'^S.te tt.«^|^y^S>l» C'^fe.ft^ v5CT'C*'C-'^, 'J^SrrTjH:. I 71^ 73 /V/#CC- ^7- <?-/774i. -f^ 'TfM. //M’O/tc.Ta.C A>/(. t<y#7/ /f^ccyf7x£:^ O/V TnK ^ AH p/t (,7iyy«S IP'', .;■■■„• , ■'■ ■■, ■ ;• . '■■y:'s j^;:'} '-^ { :''i I Oh c 6 > o I ^ n - o w •4 Ol 9- rs>- e ■4 0 0 6 ? p S I^3!c: Iss 5 S om o os ^ U o u DM9 X rs> Z o rv> o H 0>I is^ ■0 n I X H M -< X M !dS£ Som o o a M 33 O o M r- M 0» r* rv> M fO m ^ o X ? Sz:: 7^ 5 XI I m H fo* H X M ► 9 ^"i: m o o 1 i X o o ti •— o »—os. •os 3§o ^ USm ium ID M “■i CS!a5 HM </I -< C/I Hm 3 IDm i iim • '■'•^v.r^. '.'i 7\ v;:: ;^, ' 'V'• ' " ■••..:•?» . -*4. • fc .■ ;:vivv v: : ■■: J. . - . ..; .• • :: % •ViiAMiS: /■ f, -r . .'■■ ; ‘ X 4 . m ■JW'' ■Hi h'[r^)v'-:. "./Vv K.t ilty resulting from strict ing compliance with Zoning thin 150' (you must obtain Finance A-603 Govt Center -addressed to each of the Iress (use address labels ilculations as required, ilevations) if any changes w § m attach a separate list of application, r staff. his application. Please ot complete if the above Application is complete Date information required or B to pay all fees and/or ication, and certifies that : to the best of his/her Date / application and further City staff, consultants, or purposes of investiga- Date )ffices 25 days before the Meetings are held on the oresent at all scheduled ncil. If an applicant is 5 arrangements to have an se the Building S Zoning ■ii.. ji. ■ = -v i'- ■■■ ::a .V.' ••• . ;:r ■ ■ -l.r-t V • mx:M PK'p-•■ •■■■ ' -•' .• p - ■ *■, pa;^;.:P-vv; --. ■;-' ;. ;■ : ‘vP • •:. ■ •-•■. (iv •', ■' ' ■ ’fev:-':"P-;'M-§ Mmm[te:P 'B.; ■-: -^ w-n . . ' ■' "r-T; ,i.' ">-m; :-: fv:;;.:.: III - '• .: :•■-■■ :' '.- ^ • V' • -• ..' ' '' •; I' ■ '-V — p: ■ % --A - -!k:: k IP. . = ..^r. p?ilix-. X.2 L '-v.-'W;... P;. -K.-p>j Wm§' f m • >jfc= W p " ‘vi./ ‘: "‘P,*P m •■ -p• p ■'■ ' •••'■ I'v • ■•pKpPi .’■•■■ P PP ^ > \S H ''jiv;;^'-ir-) •"- tiome) ciu OF cm) FimCE OFFICE 01 Cf.V 200.00 ----------------- CHECK 71 200.00 . - - ? i - oo^ifiECEIPT-THm YOU -------- mam cool Roi 115:49 torrens? 02/26/S9 included on v57 - c>o6 & ne (work) V~^/ ~ o<=*o8 toijo Zip:_fj£liJ7 home) ne (work) Zip: {month/year) tls of land. V,- :> V- ::- '.'. v;: V> ^'•■‘c;■ :■.' ■:w-'I ,<••■.■ ,'■ ■■■'J.-/'v'-''■ •'■ V v; -r •:':,■■. / iV Residential •; < ■'. a:--/ ■ : :: ■ V'. '-?W specify)_____________________ truction Cost $ 30, ooo ^00 Hardcover ide Rear) V-:' : ■/WmMM m-'-■rXt ■• •irffiflihTi I rfclT^\>,■;■'■'■*:'vi'^ J|f||^d||i|,, *■ «*■■ ■ • •. fifir I 3t-^ K. 'U,,, .............*"BAROSBIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ DESCRIPTION OP DNUSOAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ • REQUIRED SUBMITTALS /L4 Completed Application Form vfl'S Certified Property Owners List of ov'ners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center ^48-3271>. 3.y Stamped'i legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. © 'i':. v--> 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature _______________________________ Date_________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied i-s"true^-arfd b^rrect to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATCRE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, c.gents Commission members^ and CoujuHrr"members for purposes of investiga- V this 're Date tion and verifipation Owner's Signature 4I, Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings arc held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■■ , . ■ r‘., .;■ -V, ••:•=::..:••• -I ;,: ■ .,; ■•••!.••■■■/•.. . ■ ••': .■■? ■:•■■• ■■■■ ■ ^ •V. .. .•, . ■. • . •■■■^: ■; -n.'..VV-':v 'a 'v S'iimmM ^r>ir / of Bohn's Point Road that of Orono. le detached structure nor in-rental residential unit roval and permit from the CITY OF ORONO “ VARIANCEInitial Application Fee $150.00($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00(no change from original application) ter-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address f*yO(^ /Sof^s cm cr Df<m FimCE OFFICE Q 01 CES 200.00 CHEIX n. 200.00 T15:i9 02/26/8S . />yq ^ If ^ - OC/ <iSCEIPJ‘" YOU Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) - --/—- - - - ft063170 COOl ROl T15: Please checlc one - Property abstract or - - torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. __ Phone (home) Phone (wor)t) V^/ ~ 8 Address: ^T, City; O4.0K/O Zip:_£0_2/ [•iTKIH;i (if different than applicant) Name Address: Phone (home) Phone (work) City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) . » ^ A-'-r I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ Present Use of Property _Residential . *?. •• mmmmM r wffmmrnr y.' Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP RBQOEST Estimated Construction Cost $_^^^j_f£o— describe request in detail: __ _ _ _, ' ■'-■ V.V. -r'"’ myn ¥ ■■% M, S VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( -V* Front Other Side Rear) I ... V- ■ Ipiiiim ■'V. .Z'' ■! ■■■ . i-i mm: ^ '/ '•A'i ■■■;;■ •=■ . w,j ;-r^ y-—;^ .;.. ■ . .. ..■ , ■ ■ yfy ’ pk r ♦> h i . ■■y i-'A . ■■ :^09M '.'Jil ym/oimm 1-. "•■■U ■\.’ M9 a I*:. : : : . f r.mmmrn•4^- =•• ^ -v '.- :a-'-. :o;/'..'. Avvtis :m :v ■l",' 0 VV^^-.v-'v ..V^-.:-: = ',;..:-4l-'--Vv.iiaB^t'<'" er a variance setback for the ?Si . ,o preserve that limited yard ocation of view windows would the east side of the house. 1 the northeast yard area the east side property line, ssen the impact on the adjacent )rovides the much needed turn' re. bhe County Road because of the ,on9 the roadway and the garage the existing screening. cation, the applicant was not o reguire an area variance. In 8 policy to include not only . that are inhabitable or usable the accessory structure area. ( no storage area within the :ea was needed to provide the its out, the structure has been .dential surroundings. The 20' >unding natural plantings along bure will be constructed of the ence (redwood siding). its from the neighbors notified jf B. John Lindahl, Jr. for the J that would approve a 86 s.f. .ance for a proposed detached icant's addendum and repeated conditions; ration permit for the regrading retaining walls adjacent to the permit prior to the removal of WMm•vt.-:-'.":\r. ■ ■' .. ' i': ; svi;v:v'>. N i\ h fr.- • i -.- ^ . .1'" •ol ■"f'" ' ■ ^ .-vxv-V- mm-mci ii&'s?? ry_* — - - ^ fc-1..'-:% ... '•. .w "V >. u %> . .v;"' ^ ^: mofmwmms Zoning File #1253 March 11, 1988 Page 3 of 33, Applicant to deed the travelled portion of Bohn's Point Road that intersects the subject property to the City of Oreno. 4. Plumbing shall not permitted within the detached structure nor shall this structure be used as a second, non-rental residential unit without first obtaining the appropriate approval and permit from the City of Orono. ^ • : •■• ■.' ■ k'. ■ ': • t. m 4 7 ■ ■■: ■ ;v cjvH; '"7: •■vigr" - ^ /V ■ f Vp;'*:' V ■■■. :..<tv- : "■..-V .. ■". ms' 1 S. 'i mm- • ■ .r. \ • '«g ■•taij■■■ -‘jflssjNr■ <* ■ng Administrator Bohn's Point Road - i of Accessory Structure level 792 s.f., attic area 294 »et Yard Setback ping ■ upgrading of his resi'’^*'ce and the existing accessory shed and gle 22'x36' detached garage with rage as the present residence the wideningr lengthing, and of the entrance drive. Please . Staff had to back out of the length of the City vehicle and present garage. Applidant will B adjacent to the entrance way, ons cannot be connected with the iw garage but it clearly falls require a land alteration permit bit G, note that site distance lies and perennials along Bohn's present 3-3%' height. -Vi m md i;-v-: v--v -- (A : - -.,Ar i,i; J V >:•■ 1 f iv>^mii • V-: tA-y, ■: A-; .V;;;: .y':v iM % .’"i3 ;Vy^’mvmvm f. :• •■■•' lK»Si! p;.a; ■■i=.fc* ..Vvvwy^\.r • .* s- .Vy.A; -yy; A.-'f . . .' ' ■ '■■A -' * ‘■ •' ■. ■' y »'-T- • .*. *■••**.' • '•: • y ' •• . 'y y ■Hv; if:. v: ■ ■ ■V-.vv..f,.-;-^'^0 • j.- ■ aa-:av.,a.:;g Zoning File #1253 March 11, 1988 Page 2 of 3The applicant has asked you to consider a variance setback for theproposed garage citing the following hardships;1. Limited flat yard area and need to preserve that limited yard area. 2. Interior design of structure and location of view windows would prohibit the attaching of the garage on the east side of the house. 3. Location of mature maple tree within the northeast yard area. Garage ?n^ its propoVed^ location'IfA 1^ lessen the impact on the adjacent neighbor. 5. Moving the garage further north provides the much needed turn­ around area between the house and garage. 6. There is no visual impact along the County Road because the mature, dense screening that exists along the roadway and the garage will be installed so as not to disturb the existing screening. At the time of the filing of the application, the applicant we s not aware that the accessory structure would also require an area variance, in fec^nt applicat^^^^^^^^ il has been the City's policy to include not only around floor area but to also include levels that are inhabitable or usabxv. I 29 4 s!f. of attic space had to be added to the accessory The applicant has advised that there is no storage area within the principal structure and that the attic area was needed storage*^ space. As applicant's addendum points out, the structure has been designed to blend in with the existing residential surroundings. J^e 20 high structure will be screened by the surrounding natural P® the north boundary line. The proposed structure will he constructed of the same exterior finish as the principal residence (redwood siding). The City staff has received no comments from the neighbors notified for this review. above. Approval is subject to the following conditions. 1. Applicant is to obtain a land alteration permit for the regrading of the drive and the placement of the retaining walls adjacent to the drive. 2. Applicant must obtain a demolition permit prior to the removal of the existing garage. S r-' y-'.=y.vyyA' ■ ..A : ^ .. (■: • • v.y ir-'-' 'm wm^yVrV-y'V: i • ■■ S:?a: • • ; Vrr‘:’* iyvy i'lWV-Vskf:mvvmv-yi v'.--- s.■ Aa:.- AA ;4iE'-y ............m : y;.- :\yy• .-i:; v'L-. V.-; ^y.rr-i:=; •■•fe:.A4y .yV-' t - ' - h ill .^ '.y-m^yyyy -teH m WiMm mmmm ^ ^ f. V; -f; i' < i ■"-V • t\= ^ ^ ; v: .: J XiiMiuMfim &^§sm ■^•■- - y ’■ ^ ■:'"'-.-J^/ ':^m-- iv:' i\ \mr ^' ;.:r . •: ■ >:-;;^‘;;:l:VC.;^---' f ■.: .•;, ■ ■• -. ..y.l f ^:^,- • " ¥m. ^ ■'■■i-^ mm -:m- ■ -:::::^v:vv.;-;,:^ -■:,'-.y-myr..':r-. : •■'■^■. - -I' .;■ - ■ • ■■ •■^•'; . ‘.V s.-/. . • .♦• •' • •» '• f •* • ••• • ' ft-■ ;v-V ■ v-^-d I » B»s;3f‘4 mim: i .; .■■•!'•* - Hj - i . *•. k ; ./ ' /V ^ fc'sat 0'"v:7 *-.?■mmmm. .* *‘ .3^ '•Pir«si.*?/ ■.;•■.:,■■v:^:^• ■••••;:Pr^-y-//Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonFr<»3 Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 11, 1988 Subject: #1253 B. John Lindahl, Jr., 1406 Bohn’s Point Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lB Lot Area - 22,475 s.f. Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Allowed ■ 35% 15.1% 23.7% Pertinent Ordinances - , Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) - Area of Accessory Structure Allowed ■ 1,000 s.f. . Proposed •» 1,086 s.f. (grade floor level 792 s.f., attic area 294 s.f.) Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Street Yard Setback Required •= 35' Proposed * 18' Variance “17' or 48% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B “ Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit C D E F G Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's Addendum Survey/Site Plan Floor Plan/Elevations Detailed Site Plan/Landscaping Review of J^>plication ** .... The applicant is in the midst of major upgrading of his resi r^ce and yard area. Lindahl proposes the removal of the existing accessory shed and detached garage and replace them with a single 22'x36' detached garage with an attic area providing much needed storage as the present residence structure lacks storage area. The improvements will also include the widening, lengthing, and regraling of 30-40' of the severe 20% grade of the entrance drive. Please be careful if you plan to visit this site. Staff had to back out of the drive onto Bohn's Point Road because of the length of the City vehicle and the lack of maneuverable area adjacent to present garage. Applidant will replace existing timbers with bolder walls adjacent to the entrance way, the steeper elevations. The land alterations cannot be connected with the issuance of the building permit of the new garage but it clearly falls under the 100 cubic yard standard and will require a land alteration permit issued by City staff. Please review Exhibit G, note that site distance will be protected with plantings of day lilies and perennials along Bohn s Point Road. The wall will not exceed the present 3-3% height. rs.^ ■ . ■•• :: •• ■ • r • ; ;v:a <■. 'Vi : ■ ■• ’•’!••“ ' zmxm-v m m :y:yy\'m\ -m: ,." ■H V:v.vkxW>l. ;.;V: •::i 1 y-yj:. y - y ■ ••■ii^yyy'm y?vv'v:;;„'vv V .A •=• :■•.■ ■.. .V ; I' 'i yyyymy^:^-- rX, v:: ; ym } ■yy-^^^yyyyyy/^- ak ■:i ymyyyiy ■y-myyy'yyrn-mm-yy:- . IL. miwiiiwiii.• : ' : '-A I:-' ■ 'ymm^s-ym :>rx^:riyyyuy--. .. . .. ’. . .• • - t ; •..•■ ’ yy-.:yym:yyy- .■ 'v--: ii ■ - A i:' ' - -i A'- 'T. V/ . • -J: *.' V- i'- • : J *.••• •. •i': ^ m’m '/Vi.i -v. ••• J y yy:.- •••■'• yy :M my; ZoniMarcPageprop awa: rec groi - 2 The pri sto des hig the sam for Sta res are gai abo mm. ': .-V., - m- — ■ -. • ; fe-..,-.; :•■■ ;v:. ■ •;’ :■-;•■ ' ■ ..-.J r?=‘:vv:, ^/^ r:' ' B- "yy-yysSMmmimm BWMmfm .IpiiSa S-'t-i-A.:: ■'‘ mymyyytm K liiM'-illa: ra ^■y-m^y -> mmkri\y-":^''--.- *:Wa mmy-- tSvfeitc:?-: ■ ; :-■■ i-;^;-^.---:;;^',; ... ” i ' «■ -'a ■ : ^ '.^V-rv., ®il rm ■'••■I-'--. p:|f: j wmmm 1^' ■-'IWt*' . . .: V ; ' ■ *. .-••i Vt '< :.\j tV:fea>-v^:; '^v:; mm..in^>:' - 0**hr»5 I ^xi^i-m^ Shore BROUJN ‘3 lake AIINNE ar-auni •♦ ■ \. '. .! :■ ,L. :■v.V-=rV-^i^r:;.v . . : .' •'ili S' - /:>.;.-:v -•!■..-:v-,..-- ' - i- !-? ••t%}\ . , • . m-' ;•••■. ‘'‘■•i.'TiTv^ ' liPp - V mm m::Wm i^ *‘'^’I' ■■j: : ';^" .■y.m m^■^:-^..m-u.\ ■ m:m. p?: »l ■ * . . •M .■ flUf -r • .V-# ■miMmm-■mmmm§fl:iiWiiiiiifiiNii^iii# jj I EXISTING GARAGE DR 0000000000000000000000000m00000000000»00» 4-t 1-4 EXISTI^ BLK • \- V '• V V V i' V V ;• ;• v <i<%-v v v r v wc \\\\\\\X\\\\\\\\N\ \ ^ ^ ^ ^ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\V \\\\\\NN\\\XN\X\\\VX S SECTION :iH : ^ ■■c-v-y;:.. . . w . . '; ■ -X ■ '.■' : ■; ;••• ■ '•, ■ i. - ■ .•'■■•■•• :■••■ • ■ :«*■Pj^ -f-v-■yy'pyk-^^^y"^;; :tu:-* ^ ' v:mm..V-.>=-.--44^-: ■-•■•■ ■•.'.. ■ . '■■■. -. ■.. * ^ • - •■' ■■■* ' • ; '.v* • *'■*■■: j * • ’•*•.* "••*•...' ■- ■• .'•■' . ' ••■wy-- ■'■■ .•'; -i-!. .1 •••;.''T".••■■> : . p -■• •:K^;->Pp.L ' ’-'J -••- --1.’',- ' .jiB .»^ -,-«« y«, x<v- - '"‘■./HU'-'U/V' ■ < 'Yf.'y'*"'" *■' "'• ■<''A5t«--->' '• ^p•:^ p/Vp/: - • ’^-p'f3WfnMfWf3P2C521Wf2C3WTrfB ',■••?':'^^**'p-'-*'t'*■''■ v-'*. o . >? • .. w ;»» n ’’■ ■ ■ ■■yyFm^y^- . V^^.. ,• . *f <rf" '■ ‘ <*<"<'-^<yjK'• ■ • 'i^ * ^ ' ^ # ' ■ '•■>- 4;.. ' n,4/ f,-0 • •' - vr., ■*4J-.-,."-j,iF«<>t/.t<fc>*>4«** .-r r. t. .^ ,.- t .me.f ^ :V\v , '•'- .•i,.:-'Vrt--> . >•■< ■' " '-'V'4 'JK-ll ‘-T T ^ii?5 Wis» p»fei€ 7: .Mm •:.=P--'.:-v J^v-'V 1' .:v.!HK ‘:. :.vvsj4^♦V:- ^ ■' tsts iiii 7-0X16-0GAR DR • :•: • :• •. • •• • 'czz • m m •m • • •i:i:i:::•:. •. :tiK~'-y!.:f- '. ;.•• >: ym^: r , ■:■ .*■ • ,' *• ■ ?1 TPS' « • r- M ' . ■ . . --^V ..■•/. ■;•. v,m:-.v iftf',;:'i;”..!/yr RUBBER MEMBRANE OVER 3/4- T&G PLYWO ?"v PPy;!M';?y:E®ES3 f XWiU.Lft’MOV/ ■ L'P ■:'■*• ‘v;-V-p--■" 'SvifiyP’P v^lS P'-; ..* P'-Vy-'v-ito ;■';idw •: ' .. • -sf mH-:./- ^::;v '-7: V.p-*. :/• : .•- ■■• ;.: ■ .- ’'t:^.;.-'^' :' ■ .. GARAGE FOR: DANA WELLS 1397 ORONO LN ORONO MN mP'*1mm pj ii mikmiu. rw Iw-.t P‘A.- jil Mm * ::a|vHv'.. VA :a • ■ ■ * •• •■• d Bffmv ,VV:::K:. a;:'::- : ■- :-\r , ;- / ' .,- ■/■■••■.•,'. ■ .•■■'-■.I Mimmm. i J im .:\-<:r:Ur\-y-,:-ri:'..'-,^f:m'■.•-■■'v-;.: :l; '.\.. •■•■, ■/•. •>•.■•■ ..J: m •• •^■' ■: ‘ -I'f ■' : ■■■ '■ ■: s* • ■: 1 ' i. f *■- .; •Ai. 'w."I ■ - ;.#:1 m- *•■•.:•••■ vi- ■;■•■■: P’ppPp^-x-p'::;---.'.:., p pr-'i ■■"-PP-: ;P -'p-: •':':P P ■'. ■ A': - ■ ^:’^. ■ y •V/:..:>, •>:’c..;-P.' 1 - . Mm iffm ^i'^PP :'-P &••• ■..•., P" Adjacent Property Omers* Acknoifledgeaent Form I (we) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at (3^t1 <Og<otjr> LfttJP? also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement# I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the 0 property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the pro­ posed neighbor's project or use requires City Council approval. Property ^{IS I ■ &mu> hMQ / %%:y Owner j - - ^ - pate J 'OM f- ThiiJi pr _JhMlLm-L JslcIk^UUMJ-^rSri L Property Owner If you have any Information that may assist tl.c City in the review of this Land Use Application# please submit your comments to the Building &. Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meetirg date. p£is:-:pgf !ii^ iS* ^s 5hS ^ 5^6 ^ «f| 03 11 5» kk UJ A K<o o Z UJh> Z M OSISiS PSjiji ^ K UJ 5 wD*2H (0 UJ a UJ X V BgP* UJ u. u. M tt O O O' V i. i TO"I--riaife^mmm‘'-'Eji■ : : ;:fl m2ms§sm,:f t ^1 M 55^^!k fe;: mmm ' -' ■, !!' .■■'■;■’• •• ' u- *•:'•'■ ■-.:, J. E..., ^ ;-:v . ■-^m . • .. Si ; E J L K £:;^=V/:Vv : :. V. V- ,;s- .-■;> •.; ■■^:"’si' 'vr'‘: - /s:;.... v -:/ cj La _ 0 / O lA XcT^lti/uw^ tcLC i<L 5 vc<Ct^ tcti 0 . tr_ X>.i^ '^■f*5 /“If*■ --V,Hilm a c'^ci. U S u-t fC e uja_fi^^ . tc ^fOA^’irt ^cLve- ^ -(^CH.C AOC^V T(S Cc'.V' bocit" . -:• • .1•'• ji S;'H!fi?| ■f .ipiSS *•'• i.' • • •:••IL' fv ,•-. :=:» ■ ...•^'. ;' • * ■ A 1.. ■ .; : '- - .P's ^u.c ^oo' -i i<U, 'at'oTaui- (a JCi . [.0-eC.l^ ■#-»V . ^ pp1plip=^ --r'• ^'^r-'i.' 1 ^ f^v=/^ v;:.. • ' ;> :^-. vmmMrn-i i;- V. V . ■ShV'.: -V'-iV' ■: - .' . i KiiSlilii jfe.-■ ■, ^ ; ,'^■•V■^^^::;#<.^w*y.■■:':-■ . ■ ;V' p.-. - ‘:.i‘'m i I .0-:.Li;-.» -4 mrp.’ >•.-!■■:■ Wmmmyf:^ ^;-¥ ';.i‘ -•■■•■: "3 ”-*-'';i-v -v' V/V ' 'f . t’ : L-v, ll: ' , ■ ; y.-:.. ■‘■■'■- -. m mL& ti ^j » gs >• o s ♦H:i'v . . -. :•• .'•• • ‘ *. > .;■ ' ; t;5 p:r. 7§^ = P tgggf V . 35M in (O H s o M M lu U) siiiii JJ53^ KS“ I o u< Ul ge ui UJ O 10 10 7 * ai O l> V >• CD ••« Ui UJ fO O X X i IIXX o Z Z H 10 ^ < (0 to Ui UJ a i!( r --ipf••iX /.♦v .;v: ?•> - =■• ■:^•;.i/«••*, OKI *. . < ■' ' — tf,t r _ f? UI 2 o OP C ~ ,§is iaS»o «• 5 to ^ S O O O *4 3 CM Z ? 6 H o ^ 5 ^ 5c^ M M ^ N Kt at QC o* >* «3 ?§2 !:S;:iw§£ 7 **«<cM^r rOH O' < < N lOZZO'>-0 ^ < 4 Kt <ro o o O 3 ..T mmm '■*••;"» 2'j ■:, .- ...^ ' ; -. :/i'--'K-. • :; ■ •*..• -....♦ • •} •v^"’ - ;-. Vi . r M IP < O CL p >- H UI g UL z X Z M Ui » »- to UJ ^ £S(E£u a UI u. ^ M DC O O '.■■'■ ■ -O' ^'O. 0.o'-.--,L- !•■ ••■■';'^ . V • ■•■ L- •■ *'i ■■ ■ •; ;v -..•••■" ’ >:v'’'-,- ': >• . ..•..••••. .”.• Jipfi'ftv :*4:;-:; ;<v V . i;h tSii': : ■^V ,vV;V?:;J LMm L*vV-r':>■'•-'i- mm.. vll••.I ••• 2 .>1m^mmm■■■ :■■ V--;'■•■■.■:•:■y resulting from strict m g compliance with Zoning I'j;. • ‘.VX K-' 'v' V't 1 150' (you must obtain lance A-603 Govt Center Iressed to each of the IS (use address labels i ' culations as required, evations) if any changes * *1 '"•ii I :*-•' »ch a separate list of Lication. O'- .:-VV ■V'• application. Please omplete if the above application is complete. Date ___ ______ -mym \ *f :i •'■ •■ ,•: '.--r .•■•.. ..:'■ . ' -.i - •• • • . ,• . formation required or 3 pay all fees and/or :ion, and certifies that 3 the best of hxs/her Date .1 0 ^ I s 1 .cation and further staffr consultantsf poses of investiga . Date il s^U5 ces 25 days before the “tings are held on the sent at all scheduled 1. If an applicant is rrangements to have an the Building & Zoning nmM-I ■'i-:.'--t''■:■■ •V.vr: ^■ , '<•-‘3 '. ■:^y-.c:m; ; > ■ tc.:; I ,fc, '■m W-' V-Jifi ^ - - a...4ft ^ •■■r'^'Xi:i*y-ryyy:n' -V;*-:v-:v-vxi^- ..■;^ : r,:I i‘i -/ O »1 c>Let Cl 4^- Ovv rtc ^xJLiV /I -4>Cl^Tlvl^x Ko t(Xt I K\‘Va ................j Ciik. -(1/tfcv^, ecclcug* /rf -(4’ v» c»- ^'(xjl L, , I Cr ^ ^ 0\k ^r>ov clxjl L bf_ 1 (.C‘v'1 (c ^fCO.\a -^CH.c ({o<r'v *hj boat \4tv» A<?Viip "" _ • 5 ( be JGX-«oring ^t\na.<^(2_ tJ C (^Lk u.«-< tec '(4vC K ((? Ct^t n. ,pt.o tcLC ic & \ n 1 i o^>vt^i(!hwv ^ livAleb fl. ( ^^£i2!:5'<3r ^ ^ t,*>. Cc^A..- >0 * UCKJ; WU M.R - -KejCrt u -^a.\ ijV c '»a' ■5-f ^ c .H j? <1 ((.lH-C vvUt^ci'. C C'>iSi'jTAut“ toxS-te. Lee ^Vf t . fv,vO-u/ft ^ ‘ W^' >■2 ;4'4.f-v, »/ ■:■ > A..'- :. •■■'•■ • 3..: 3 :•mmmA;! ii. . ... . . ^•‘-< ‘‘V;ir’' ■■ h.'-*^ fcji ^ ■ vi ■ -y-y,--- ■ r■ yy^ft: j y’: w ..*;: ■4\ ->.••• :>'• iv-' V Vv;.^’^ 4#44V;av^ wyyyy::£m-‘’y>-^\ ■ £4 •- '•= • ■ 1 ; V-- . ■■cy-y^'immmyyym■■c ;■■■=•■ s;- II I' ' ' ■ ■■• •> •=.•* y ■ : .3^ v‘;.t;;'. ( ‘’ c '4- : :•■ •• ■•■:•* • •. ^yd ■'.V-S'". _ •• •••»IHUtSlKfekr. 34 '4s 2 a: r" >■ . =4 >..;• ...v»r;- '• ■■ - ^ uMyy^'yyy^^--y yyys:^ l^-'v 3v3 -;i- 3: v'v , V.:-a 4-. -•:: -.v ’^4v:>... ^-^yyyyyy ---y ^ ir' Mi;,' . f" •A i»«i ^H........ .*iMl.. i '‘’ ,*-y .S' >,':-ir^;U'if^/9s -so i:> ■'.. -..A Mmmrn.■•; .V ^M y.^11 -r CITYff otm FINANCE OFFICE 0 Ol.CEN 150.00 CHEIX ■ 7L 150.00 RECEIPT-Wm WU m3080 cool ROl TlOiJE 02/2im k" ■ ■ ■ ■ .. ■ M i-S i»;2S L^. Zip: i3^?j^ii I%VJ K-■i,:: . '-• V K' - VV-^i, ■yi.^Ky ,'y" zip:iv;’' ' yv;^.,---. • ■■^ ;= (roonth/year) ano. * .y’x'.--; V ..-; Residential wmsmwsmism 1 Cost $_!£A£^minimiSi" cover V' :. .^- : ; r:;.^ •;•-■: • V . '•■ '• i 1 '.y Rear) mw-mmsmsm ' '"x;/:.-,, ;XV, mWMiirM : > k/»*|yg^gvyy-si' HP?--' '■•■ ' 5?«v.*:y' -XxX • X ,xy j| X XX X Xx;. xxx>.^V ixifx. xx:v^ *.• .. ':s^i xx;-.>.^y;1^mm r. . ■ ■ ■■>mXmimmsartHii ......m-: : :. ■■.■•;"-*-yix'x* -li ■ - •< X . r■ |i yx.x, : k>''- V-P' •" yx-iy'^ .y • •.;• -.VJ HARDSHIP ^ , . .____Describe undue hardship or enforcement of toning --eguiytonsy-^^practical difficulty resulting from strict“^o'nj^bfuSrp™™ Code Requirements:_ rbouired sobmittals iT^ Completed Application Form owners within 150' (you must obtain llTs'uli Ir^TH^^^nepTn Counl^Department of rinance A-601 Govt Center 348-3271). i^rsae filO) ore-addressed to each of the “^Ton t^Vfbol ‘/\is"w!irno return address ,use address labels Obtained with property J^calculations as required. i- ^s'ur%“e77eii"s'S"fd proposed elevations, if any changes iurL11oV\'?n^%ft/»V^- , 3eparate list of S. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _fikaej|UjJWsc-^(A#^- - -- eian this application. Please ^SLSl^J ‘thJt ‘ y“o"u^^j:rirnLTpriirafion Is not complete if the above information has not^been^included. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ■ :•...**;-x ■■■• y--y ■.’:' 'x:r//xX : y! '.. •■■ .• •. .;■ ;.x.x : y .-V.■■■••»• y X??:■ .y-' • .'■ -V-i . . ■'. ■:•• . ;. 1-' ■■;.■ f...';: •': ■ mm yx \y - — . , •■.y,xv;yr ■ •y x'^y.mxm y -y.-v-'Vy^^Y- x;X .'■■y "■■■'••■■ yyyv-••xy-y^y y • ■ ■• ••■•. y ■ -y » V' ■' ■, ■ ^ r ^ li :^yy^"s..* -• ■; . ••' V,;. ‘ '■: V;. :.> yyy-•fv *m information has not oeen __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ crr;nrcrtrorb;"wnrre;rr"t;ent that variance Application is comple . Date _ _ _ _ __ zoning Official ’s Signature. APPLICAMT'S signature rsrnviae all information required or The ^licant hereby agrees \o pay all fees and/or reauested by the Zoning - loolication, and certifies thatuS eVnses incurred in review of this ,i3/,er the information supplied is true ana knowledge. —\ i <\ « • 'Date Knowledge. ^ Applicant’s Signature tTy^nr^ W . tua ■il:)^lsi owners signature ra^r-opet to this application and further ?h^wner hereby ackowledges fn^ perty by City staff, consultants, authorizes reasonable entry ont i^^mbers for purposes of investiga . aqents, Commission members, and Council mem tlofa^d verification of this request. ^ | „ ' Oxu.ayy. yv'cik ------------Owner's Signature rprri'c'an-t-must have all submittals into’^C^ Jg PlLning Commission Meeting, ^i^nning Commi^s^si^o^ present at all scheduled third Monday of each month. gion and Council. If an applicant is review meetings of the Planning oiease make arrangements to have unable to attend a scheduled n.eetinj' a6viso the Building S Zoning authorized agent attend in your place and to aav Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■>»m »•;.vi m WaWSi* Aa:' ■si-ii::^ mm I ; X •;. ■'< ■'.■■ ^ yy S:^:- ‘ . . V'M ms A-k-St. s-A: S •vy'-'oi-yy. >V.Y ■ ;: i= .. ;■ .X x'y. "5vy . S' x;: •■>■•>; 'y;;yyi f; i' ' x= •:■«■; v • -V'' . y--. mm hy:S.::r ? m 'wm^kid r- -V .•■•••: ■■' :. ':: ■. --■• .*■■ ,v-fc/: T'vy;'V '■ ■'• :»='^:'-" ■ ■ ■ ^--v ;'; ■ •••</^ Vi-'- •■ •■•*^'mf-:, ■:!:■iHiiM&ge addition to the north >1leant*8 addendum notesr iveway were destroyed in r. Applicant has restored the new walls as part of Is. Wells points outr the I property line and garage r within the substandard ar consistent with the / structures within the Certainly the required tisfied even with the he west side. The garage >m the side property line ires 15* from the side jor upgrading of the yard uring the review of the St the entire yard within rking area. With the new less onto Orono Lane and a parking area, and will no otified of the proposed no negative comments frem of the garage in relation ig the west property line lessen the visual Impact, essen the Impact. setback variance of 16* or r the property located at findings and hardships: ontains a total of 31,540 > the LR-IA lot standards »a and 200* of width. The fy the 30* side setback on encroach any further into ong the west eide property he proposed structure hardcover within the 250- reducing hardcover by stent with the pattern of neiahborhood. mm .. . ■ Pi ; ■■ - . ^-,1■■■ ■:■ !. ••••■.• ■•.••• •. •»:;/Pf IMi *^£ksTWHT**rs ^/a t )i -^==-'1"«o!o5'’Srn^craad!,r^on^l”«riinP Renewal Variance Fee $75.00„;rr4Krp:=pj:««^ _ _ _ _ propbktx locatiob Site Address ^ - - - - - - --- - - - - - property Identification Number (P.I.D.) - -- - - -- - - - -- Please check one - Property X— abstract or —. torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey* _ _ _ cm OP o/m FINANCE OFFICE 0 Oi.CEN 150.00 CHECK ■ TL 150.00 RECEiPT-nm m K06J080 cool ROl 710:12 02/26/ESt % . ..-,,v. APPLICAHT Name T^AMr*i Address: Phone (home ) ~ *-f*M i ------ _______ Phone ^wrtrV^ *4~T ^ — f-itv:\\/ftt<7 .MT A Zip:_PA^^I^ 5.*. 'mM OWHBR (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ___ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: Date Property Acquired ^ U _ City: '^C zip: (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent^parcels^of^lan^*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ PRESENT OSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District ^ **—L-A— i^^Residential Present Use of Property- - - - - - - --— Other (specify) i^raOT'op'Ji^i' E^imated Construction Cost Describe request in detail: • y® •m VARIANCES REQOIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other _ _ _ _ _ _ Lot Width Front Hardcover Vj R. Side _____ Rear)m:0- ■ ■>:■ ■ . ■ ' •* v/*i-.'4: .v: V-:■ msMmmmmm ■\ :. ■,; > -V -• : \ ■ V v.;v ‘h '■ •r :' • ^. i 4 :v .. •"•• -..lii V ^ r.; 4-.;v •-■;•> . :'■ •, ■.•;■■•.; ..; ; V: '- ■■•, ■ ■ ?Vi ='^V •• — 4 J A - ' , m.;w-v ■■■: ;.: ■: "y ■•’•• . .y•';*:« ^. 0: .-S' • • ■-V ?• T-y-.^W.V;^,:; : >• ••;/■ ■ ; V" '0dinlnistrator e - Variance - yard setback 11' for jcture) lients cm v:::v.::^- -‘,: .V --‘ ■ . <?; . ..I : . I- : , - :iv-,- ,-i-. :■ i ■■*. ..I fm0sm m ■ I Itf-l#i ■-;7?l •■••• • ■ r |‘: • ..'•>•. ■■ y syftSffl Application 11250 March 10, 1988 Page 2 of 2The applicant proposes a 22'x 21.5* garage addition to the north side of the existing residence. As applicant's addendum notes, the retaining walls adjacent to the driveway were destroyed in the stom of July 23rd of this past year. Applicant has restored the retaining walls in hopes of using the new walls as part of the structure of the new garage. As Ms. Wells points out, the existing house is 11' from the west side property line and garage addition will not encroach any closer within the substandard setback area. The improvements appear consistent with the setbacks of other garage, and accessory structures within the adjacent Orono Lane properties. Certainly the required emergency separation of 10' is satisfied even with the encroac’.m?nt of the adjacent house on the west side. The garage as it extends from the house is 14* from the side property line and as it moves northward it measures 15* from the side property line. The applicant is in the process of major upgrading of the yard areas and the existing residence. During the review of the hardcover facts please note that almost the entire yard within the 250-500' setback area was gravel parking area. With the new plan there is more of a controlled access onto Orono Lane and a complete reduction in the driving and parking area, and will no longer require hardcover variances. Both adjacent neiThbors have been notified of the proposed improvement and the City has received no negative comments from either property owner. The placement of the garage in relation to the adjacent higher elevation along the west property line will shield the proposed structure and lessen the visual impact. The existing vegetation also helps to lessen the impact. Staff Recommendation - To approve side setback variance of 16' or 53% for a proposed garage addition for the property located at 1397 Orono Lane based on the following findings and hardships: 1. The property is 106' wide and contains a total of 31,540 s.f. or .72 acres and is subject to the LR-IA lot standards that would require 2 acres in area and 200' of width. The current structure does not satisfy the 30' side setback on either the eeist or the west side. 2. The proposed structure does not encroach any further into the substandard side setback area. 3. The elevations and plantings along the west ®ide property line lessen the visual impact of the proposed structure. 4. The applicant has reduced the hardcover within the 250- 500' setback area, thereby reducing hardcover by approximately 1,025 s.f. or 30%. 5. The improvement appears consistent with the pattern of development within the immediate neighborhood. mi m t •. 1 ■I::', ■. ' . ■$ r;,'^k:y^;;;.yy:y fey-WyyyyVfv-mumm. l-KV,,- : •<. I .« '. y* :v; r 4 ^y^"' 'y 'y - y ■, V 4^ : -:.:-LM-^y^: y4:tS a'j--y^C4■^;Vy;■^:'.•^■yy> :4'' ' :'y^'..yy V''-' 1P;.-.yy-'y:a;;V■;i WMm m ll;:- '^y - ^4.:" ^ :.../^■■ ■ w'l5^ ■ ^ "4 4- - ^•' ;■'. ".•'? • 1--roC/),5''Xrfzn'O z oocz HK XMz z ar og(/) *Hzz CTio > tnc 1 »H z wn >Z a Z Mrr M > X tA o 73 73 > 73 Z •-? 73 Wronz - -;I-r 0 ¥ sX K *''■ l'rr:-;A' r.. >. <tJ •‘•^ '^x'4, W-) f %. -::v-.;iM y0^y' ^ ■' ■■■ ■' I?*;"'# ."■'■■■ ^K- ^ ''■•: •‘■^S'-^;"- mmm:iwm-• ' :■' s • •. .•*'* ^»- -V® Wifi lilSv&il te>ari::S-;aK-« msK ‘■Mm ■:M-:M- sl®iijii ■3»5S« m:. ■’Wl|:;:i!| .%• i7* V 4^ ■■:--;;.V"'^^ ■, y j r:‘KP ”*'.'• ’• •! ,* ■ ! ’ ■ ’:mmm yy V- mmmm :; v.;>mm zmX' 'XaTAa.-:;1 ■ ■:Kfmkk■xy Ln. I-'-.. :.v-4'-trX A-;X;; fV/AA.:-:-;.,' ■m$k':k . -v: V- •' ; ■ • ■ .■: ' : ■■ '-■ - ■ ■*'.•• f - ■'.-; ': ■:’■■ k-ikk'k- --<k^- : > .. k---*:kkkkk-k ■■ . ■■: .' ■■'.■• V X;‘ '• " 4*-4-1^47:4 ^-‘-.4/-’ smSt i'ivC'-z*Si ■emw-m". iKii-a rnmM^kkmkmki ■ M■'kMm •\': V/^:, , ■ . ... i.:;- TO:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonFMMS DATBS SUBJ: Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator March 10, 1988 ♦1250 Dana M. Wells, 1397 Orono Lane - Variance Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA Total Area *■ 31,540 s.f. Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.23 Subd. 6(B) Required side yard -30' u iii Proposed side yard - 14* (existing side yard setback 11 for principal structure) Variance "IS* or 53% Review of Hardcover ~ Existing Hardcover 0-75' setback area * 0 s.f. 75-250' setback area: Allowed = 4,870 s.f. or 25% Existing = 4,134 s.f. or 21% 250-500' setback area; Allowed * 1,011 s.f. or 30% Existing “ 2,000 s.f. or 59% Variance => 989 s.f. or 29% Proposed Hardcover 0-75' setback area = 0 s.f. 75-250' setback area: Allowed “ 4,870 s.f. or 25% Proposed “ 4,787 s.f. or 24.5% 250-500' setback area: Allowed “ 1,011 s.f. or 30% Proposed — 975 s.f. or 29% No variance required with improvements List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Addendum C - Property Owners list D - Plat Map E - Adjacent Owner's Acknowledgment form P - Elevation G - Plan View H - Site Plan - Existing I - Site Plan - Proposed ii*W w ^WM'^ kik kMk Mik '■" ■■-.■: s>•,'kk-^kQkk ^:k'.kkk •' :V' ; V ^w■.■'.•■; ;,..v M^^^^^Mkkkkrk 'M-'Mk -: * ='.i :•• . . A :■ . •:t. .: ' ■■ ■ :,•4;' - MM ■:;V; i '-4* ♦'•• . • ... mm'mmmkrn^ kmm ... '7‘' '. :4;.v ’•' . •■ . - A-.' 7^* ..*.•. ..»'•-cmrk 1 aC’-a,:..' -.• mk::'-kkk:■m ■ 4; aA - • ■ ■• r. .A- ■ :-m..kM •■'k k,.4v-":44:;v Wmm ... .: .V.-; . •:kkk, iMMkm^-k-kk-.:^ •'.* . ■ •.••••. -/TV .-; Mkkk k ■ :k:kMU: ■•: •: ._• ; :-V;: .C;" . ;.r - :. : ••-; :; “: ' .■ ■' r ■'-:■■ . .• A':''?- " ’ 7-4': [k'-y-M k'-kk'kM «si|s SSp|ig:;:;g4 mm ' '■ • ..• ..•’••• ■ {ff/-•' ■. '•*■ . ' •■■.'■■■'. '"■ = ;: ■■ V ' >•• ^ .;*> ■" -.'4■-•■■.- ;v-: v-.-\.-. -s^ '■■ .y k:kk- \ -k .k' \•: ::vr . kM-- ^MMkkkm. ^WlmkMkyk. k -kkkVk kkk^-jkm^^y^kkkkkM kkmmkkMM:‘- ,: ,j ( yUl^ ■ '-V--' ;■ .V' >■ •' - .........................................•; ■ ... ,>'' i- • ■'•••. • ;*■ V-r.-V s"-'-' •,.* i'. ■ ■. T--f ?.%'',W-I».. \>y :• ■ ■■ >•■: .;. i::-a J i^''•■•■-•;>V cV; ^. .■.■. •■=!iv: ■ .4mmii'Mpm;!:mm;:d ■•vK.'-'A.-. ■ ':v v_ . ,2Ziri\\V9 03C--------------------------------------------------------=—\fe»* «•J5 #;,;^':-if*i:ft - . ;: -: ':i vf:v,c-f , '1mi .■sspf 4 ’:. ••• •' % "• V '■• ■ • y-iM : • 4V-V »> v^rrC;.. . •' liiSl mmmf'iy mimp :.'. *.*. i..* ' ./■• ■ ;v=.m§k>;:..r:^tV 1=2:234!^* :i^lifei4umBmmmr:.;4.*y*V-f'<:=d:y-y'^^--y-r ': •4:-.i i ■ V - ■■• • ■" ■■ - V- •■ ’"v • - j;- •;.• ••■. ■-";--.:y ■• 4:'; ■";-!4^-rs ;■/ :' - yyiXy, -'■"I--: - ■ "'. i;^:, ' •''-^ 1.^44;4:4■ Ky,:' •^^"4vry4s;f?; Siii PiiiiPMi ill ■; -■/:• iv-vi ■■::.■ :;:q :-4 w- k4:‘".::‘ :.;4:?^fc; • .% \ - - :s • :.• . ,4..V' - ;=4V>-:yt44;;:. .i ■• ./^•> -4 : HW 44-=<V4.'.;': ' .r::tyy-^ . y4.-' ;4 ■/-: ilSI mm •4'r'.4-4.4^ •;?-^SvvJ • rvVf^,v.y .■ » fyl ymmm, *• // •\'! iV"--';.. #4>\4 , : ^ ■ ;44;-v ; ^■.■:"-;:-'^4.4y-; mm-:4E<:. .;ywRi:*sia -I rnMMMmmy V ■■ ^.V-'^'* m^$0myy iS?54,'W ’ y-,.yy : : :r--^ :yri::-i yv,;y:,yJ;:V-r'y-:-::>^..'-:t;;yyry''*vV' 'y‘4' .- 'm-y -m '■ 0y ,'■,.00' ■, yiy-0 y yyy?yysmm- mm0:yy •• ■• ••.;.-r'-^.,V, ,4. 4^- •• 4;v.f..: ;• .■/ V a; »./■■;•■■ 4^ ,4--. •:44' y ■.;mmMK-.4 »-4- : 4 y': - :-W*m%y'||j.• '4; ■ ® :» y;4my It y^V4;4444^ .♦' ■ • . t :y -j’mrnimmA y-v-y : . y. *^4•• !••. • • . i4:4i:'''-V; 44 :-t:'V^ -•:; .' . ■ ■ i • • »••,•*♦• .' — v: - ^ •"■ *• * Mm I’lP^ ItK't 4'4454'i *m!«1V- ' 4. ^ ;:€¥iyi •:ili •'S-llii S:*. -V ; . "wm I ‘ m- ’■ -t-'-jit#-—■•• ••.■•■■Siv, :Tv*?•V.. • ••:• ' ■ ,’" ■•: •••=■=> --^.• 'mM• * •rtitaii—ia>Mil£2 d‘iLlll‘9 03S •'.ei. ■ .•..• ■■'••€^Sin»i: 5?fifjII mmmt' M-' ;V ■ ■ - : '‘a •• Vv''■•^'■ ■■ ;••■: vT o-'*K-.-:- V - *• .’ . . ;.. .* '. i i o ^ I t ' i* •• • f CT r" iSi J} !i <l (<Ub a r.</ : •:. . >v‘;:-:.:. - •• ' v.;- -'v; -'i « ■ •.'...■i- ■ ■• • -'M L*'* . •/■ *:^; . -Y . ■'.;- ■ ■’ ■ ■ •. ' Sli?i ■• ■■::? - .y;-: ■' ^^-.;":'=v ^ •■ ^-- ■-...» - . ■■■■■■ f •;•'-■ r/ •■■■; ’•• '';' ••'■' ■ •*•.'■ ■ ' • Wy:'^iy- r r...V. 1.^ -1 . -■ •:• *.m■V. . -i>. <■:•;■ -y- :C\ \ '^'3mWPMymmmm:•»' ‘ ' ••*' ' 'iittilii•■ :■* .:" .v:, ■■■ .!■,. .v':./ mmmfmm te'4*''-.v ■ b;/-.'-'." • 'Kv-i--■ ■■r : ':'I"' ' V ',',• ■pppp0:rpy ■'■ ■-■/;■•=‘vs ^=-;^':'--v: yMiffyiiMmy.mm i:m.m iaiMlM [■;V: ■• ■■•> V:-'• •■-•y^-N•'v‘rv--:=v yy^yyf^m'y^yyym"mrnwmmmm I mmm :• : . : fe«®amsm •rv-^: mMm -■;. ^‘'• •*.' .. :•**- ••■ % • • .'•: iim*' M w^mmmm&piPMM■'■m m..m WM m j - / If 4 r ^ ;',.v j:-J' •'■V ■•jja^V' g :,:.vli>^<v>;\;;'.- iw ' : ^iS;p ■ ■ mmi^. m 'i'-'-iSilt fe ■ i« %msmM p:;:: •■«;■■;:. ■•■ .:;•■. -I. '•- - ..•; ■ ■* • ■ ■''. f<3fe:v\;C -:mm wmmmmHft/' u>:VSV;ff ■ ■■■-"((mi . •.mm §ks,-:^ • ■■-■i m.- ■'''',ylm '.■■ v'Vmmy ■i-4/' "ti'® ■*•a« MMlmm = ;:.:y- \v-.V- : ^ r 3 • If ■ ■ 7'-^-"-:y:Vf^my(\:\y.ym:mm:.mi ryy-i >' tili;;«:ff■•"■ i>;- .'^ Sv'::. V ^: : ; y .■:.•.■•.■ .■■'■■'if' •''.- mmmy• m';,. > ...m^mRi ......................................••••’. •'■•J * •* *v •.* *i.' • y ■■:;: ■•: ■■■. ■ \ -i '. -^tl^-- •» ■i >i -.'y;- :■ -5-P- -y w ■:^M: yM-m .' '' ' •• .., •. . . . , :<yy.y.;: i\■mm-:v;f..,y..y;,.,♦ * 4i£|y;.■ .■;-!?>;-''-'‘r'-iyiily-:vuy%yymmmym?:;--.%;i-ys-;::;s iy:vyy“ri;y;.l;V mymm^yy :. . : ■ ••• . •'. ; ••.. mmmm; iv; ... yy y ; ;iv* :. .v •mk-y 'jiyy\'y(yymmmyrn . :.■■■ ..:\ >". V ••:. :••. .. ■■••.•»• • •.■. ': v y -i iy-v: %^?Syy:.iyy icSiiaiiiflitii;W.V. iiiiiyyV ■■■#■• : ■ ■ -^ ■ : y:-:-y^y-.-''r-:y:ym::.\ ■ : >i y=*v:i;y;y ^ ■., .•.•. i :^ ■:■• ;■ ■ • •;.. ': ^ '**i!x^S3|p^yy 1 • V y ' • .rMd :\-\: A my•i-y. - : -yy- ;.: ■ ^ :l - ":■■■■'■ •■'■>4"'^iS: v V .; ’;^- y i “ ■ i y y -'-'HfW ' •y.'. yy'y:,; vy^y-;y-t.- yyy ' y,yyyy 'a-ay- ■ yj^y:. yy-Vl^yy•vy.y;.“.'■■y.y.' yy' yll» l-y^- my-^ ■i ;;^.ii ' '■. ■■ ■'‘ ■&•■ y-'''-;y^,: '■ y yy:'yy.,' I I' 1 iiilii ■jm.Pr>^o J**M>.IArCCS5 P<»tk l.an« (80:iOB I'illSBO iHIMTCn L06 nuodywoml R>*a 103 iirlr 1 Co:.h’.oy *• j r.!oon/i»- n; ii/0Ttr»W L*.10 I <hno Poin*: ittjcns toh'i sxuDt A' CTur:.'? tTki Licuur:: 3:.:ri c:;or2 wiivc r4nii:.% Lioiu je liOnill CnO!J3 DUIVK iiAiatm Licnnai; Ai? ■ ffm- i ••.!• •.•• • • -■• '■ ■■ iM&i mm >■' ••• .... ■' ? :A mm-:; ^ f V. ■ V-m;-rM •rS': , y: .r ' . ■ . . •"■4.|3,,,v;v<.,:. r-:yyyy- _44;. ' •■ • f-':■Bji*; ■^ .• ■ •■-■; ■ 4;., ■ V;',- ' ■V;..:-; 4 4'^ i', *»■ :r . . V •; ■ sfP: €3 - ■'■ ■ ■ .M --•■■:' :.r«■: ■’ JlPIlt;'’•■'•mM0;:y:‘”.V V • . .wm Pip* m y'yS;y , - ,/.V.-:i: ;mM W^ m;:. Mr-y-y-l-y !••.•■ 4- r ;. . '-'■ ;J'-. .:';,. ■4»;:;; ¥• • • • : r . yyy^y i--yy--y ^ fJKi;tov-:;> aw•• .•••••• ^^..r^" kW'JWI ' •• ;W;:^i lil^"’SfflHI iai^Wp m: m^y .3:-:'. «■•.- •: - ■ - •, :;. . V • ■ ''yi; my;m ,:!m^ asciis.::- iiS: my;iH y- . .-.-I mm:mi':yyi-:yy M0m;:;00y4 y0;yy;yym 3: .-33':'l -p»:;pi:?!3a :4: /: -V- if yyy ■:: ;ym: :-'£V:i;-y:,' i ... ’ V ’" ".V .' V' -4.'. -j.;yysyti'^ yyymmyy -:s f f '-W 1^: M M:yy :y' ■■■■ ■''.;{mmmmmpitV v-r'?-,if-' : 4.-34^^^=Wf‘•V-4-;vv-.»444:iy ■ .. ■■ '■ 'f. ' '..■: ;-5:v.:.-yy.’*.,v,.; ;.' ■ - 3 '■. ,i:-4' -:■■-;->:=■■■■■ f-.': . . .. • •• *.'••■ mrnm^;yyM wm . vA^C. 1-4 . 'rimM-..' yy; y-^r :• . :‘f ,>■ - 4 ’4 omyy M AiiwwunSgH ; .■/••' ::- '^W•f .y 7,-' • .•<'-t/■•■•:.wiPf*ne 2BUILOItlG PEr.MiT 24 75 Shadyvoo4 Ro99i VAP.tAlice ^ .J590 cnoreline ptIvs PARKIMG LOT ■ ' ■£(35U5 Lyric Avenue COliniMATIOIl 465 Park Lnno VAHIAncn ^ 1074 Lo:m Linda AvenuS ). DUILniIlG PCRUIT 2420 Ghadywood Pond OP.DlNANCn WO. 106 or.mwMicn wo.io? mmmm c5:-.=m liSJP'''' ■:*mem■c- .#1feM1KMfmiim■ymi; M-iiB >.*|p«* ' m y:r"--?v. t- r - . '»*'' - ";■.' :V mmt -v^sa ,'-e. i^e '- e--'--^ >=::■.l^v. ; ]■••■ '!■ .• "\: -'V fe/r ' V<; >: . % .:>• .': -^1 ■eeez.im ■ mmSime^mm ■ *■ ’ -t-i “.' •'"' ^ em^mM mimk :V.;;-!r-= ; >;:v- 'p-^mA ■ A•S • •> • . ., • •:.■ -/ ■ ’* '•^' ■;..■ei^-'r:ry.ey;>'■ y. " .-• ••'?^-'-r.U;: ■9.'•«■•• -rf. .£tCSMifik Iv.Sri >» C7 Ti'a ttlflfl® C3"'CIS.* Mtt !•• l^7>Ii-v th*i rie«a«^ O WC?-.r^4id*<ion9 of feno 11, I91i,. TAPIATISi 4S5 r<«tfl• 4M 'I* iMam'• 3-^ ea • koildliM oite by ''Ooaetl on Joly as, l? i»l lo^a cal«%Aio*-l an e*,4rak*»^^vMl*»coo* n| lKv«-'*"y Itoeito tKi oeotiii lo'to'*#®*^ W •••«». ttoblon, Ayoo |3> - Pf99 ft}* ■5a3Hr:s^»T:i; sSfS (jlli • •* x^’*' teisg »-T>. aibjoot to no otlio* oorlancoa ‘ ttatioa. Aye* 01 - ■«f» <0). ffy»*» ew a, Horr •‘‘oon'od, ' o tohlo tlM t5^e''/r-rnrV5V 1410 r-4«oe **il.*t »ood, f .'**ot oatll *raco loftwanatloo la evallatolc. f^atloa* 'fw 03 *• W-f* |Oioi»»» Tmi rr>«t eovsd* »wnf roo«M*Ml» to t»M» tl» r^ 1 r-y JOtoo Rorolotloo OBtil tt« »««t t«prn?ll r-“tlT j *t Wio lOT'"at ©f Mr. Irfmla B. o.;’'•■■ nr* Ay©« 131 - n r» <®». It j mt tin t«T"»^ ”*• “»*" “tr*.iasr‘7f ftoar Jeixss BcClcary. Motion# 1*..^ Vr» r-*»t Rovad, Bor* r"*c«M»4©d» t^lo tho r y r t4»o llonnro until tl^ n ^ wewlr.T * ............. 1 (0).C:'*»ttcil rretiny. l*3tloo» fiyon (3) “ M«ya r^. Dtn' ' I /.‘ jl'a# n^t:Oi. y for **T. I nrty Pork of e< rth r -Jt- tJ.ivo nrliia* »f -I ptofcnt to disco ta *• T 197*’ f rln» llc^nrio, Dln«w'3 kco eonc" t-^a f c.: ,ntf tl'-.4 of m tv VC y c'. 'j-.iin^ ^cf'«nt 9./J.4 olcvaticn* l:r. Bouyl&a pmlsca to oend to thn Cit y o %rrlttcn n’- • ry of t'l ? Ir'.al »;.d f.ic cti or' • :'^«ta to cu of ordlnrity hitk vatrr r-rk. -art hln r-gu.' .. t for rcvlnlo.i It yot Vrn f ;t rv> . 1, r t. ;r. 11*-? r-.', VI d, to t'lilo tl»« Tirth C! aru Drive It-rina llTCnao until a full Council lo prcc'.nt. r.cLltn, Ayoo Ui llaya (0)« H. yor Van Meat moved# Masion^’lo eocondod, to t.-blo thn Cayloa Larina 11<: ur:a until a full Council la preaent. llotlor., /.yea (3) " Uaya (0|. tyem :i Ik ye e t-‘‘ ^':,. V, :■ ■ • • \ -j-'':V-.- •' •;••• ^ '■■ ■'■■■•■; y.-t \’-y -. -<r^. :^y. e- ee/:.-y. : imeymeey ;'<>.v;‘‘.vt A"- - ■ ^ := ;■;•■■^/^■:i .^'■e ■ .■■■■.> VAJHATOi >144 4483 C3mt1'''I Oo^fk'.oy * V rri^WaaWKf P-tt^nV lilO t 4m fotet 1^'^ mma tw siawr B' CTtim CAT UAJlflMi Lxoaica rDl.r?* CT -.. 2 rMVB I- JIXEA Idtc^iics LOi iit snoru ohivb tlAnXHA UCr ilGE CAYIXS llAniUA LlcraiBB mmWm e-re It . ■■ '.• ■' '■.■ '••• ' '%■ •■.' , V ■' ■" mArrm -11 W^& I " ::■ ■ ■'" ’ .. -m-ii 'A- ■■■'f'MM 1^tt *■ ^??'** ’ ^V: ■merer.,e l-eerrrr ■¥e^e;:mmm meme .. ■.. •<■ • ■S&i .^r. /•■•■' /[erer;e-r‘Aer-me >'■' ■■ : ■err-eey).M iK' ii tv iL‘ itlj; ‘Mr ....•• sV • ; W. •=•H;V- ■ ■ •.■,., : -•.» ■ ;■ • ••:■^i' 'mm^m■••r -M Wf'^f^moNKA: 7:.;...,1 *'-'.-.3U-V*'’ V *‘si'1 . C’) ’"'"iX' ' r: Z(, A*" 'V\'\' ^ ■' Hv..;• v..-..;vJ* . • *. * . • '•* s»- ' • ■ f » .•••■ : ^V 'V-x-vi&x.mm .r X: ;mmm '■■■' -yrr'-.m-' ""' m:: : 4t. ■ r:: •:.v.---*^-. :'i ' • <- ' ■ •■■ X# , -f •- ■ . •. X>' JmMgtmmMM 'xf.=;x^^x:.v;;:■x•xv:::;;^x •« ■■ ;: x .;• ■ V£=i :■ > X> ■ .X XX:-#X::, -.X mgmgrnm '■ :wW'50"X/X ' ■; ^ •"'’•••x ‘-:; v'X , '.h ;:.-r'X X xxx?.x ••>^s ■ •■■XX': >■■ ' •■ .•"■■X:; X ,i "■ ■ ■■■■•»"; • ■•■■rnyM-^m k-4: tx-^x^-x X -x--^ X. ;x.>; ;X'"' X,..; f.,:-- - .V ■: ■•. ■ ■ ■ ■•:•.. liifexx.; ■• X 1 :*X ;-x-^. X Xjxxxx-' P; ft®;:- ;. -:. lip • . . ‘-r.* * • •• ' * • •*mr ..'■m-mfesii'XX'^$x.v-^u,^x;;::%x«imm ilxX:^ mikwm f^x;xr;il|i : ■ ;X•v^.^X>■i•^X•■XX/.■•1»VX^^t•Xx'"|V^X:XX;:^:;;XX;•:;.%^^:■,.^ . •-• •:; • , -• :'.-• . X- ''; " ’ X •• ‘ ' "•' ’ '-/ . .V " • - •:;^;X:;:-X 'i •rt.:;vxx;xx;v X ■■';;«Vx: •■••.:•••••. - ;\ •' : . . X.; X'.: VXf*: := ;;^V. •txx i:.. x^xx-x.W- :4r M- mm - •. • •. J-' . r -\;wmmm: '■■ -:■■ ■ ■■ *•■ ■■ :'.' .^•■■•: ■;.: .X- ■ Xv:-:.-;';. W XvV^slX X r*i 1 [iHv] ■■•, .. ; , ■ y ■; .--r •■ ::-XX -^.ft-.--^:" = ,'•■ X : V,..;. .-i. ' > /<: x/".X-:"'4'' .;- V- ■** ••;; >; ■ :;* ^•^;x-:'. .=1 <.XXX:-; -V, ■ ' ■,;; ^,;,. ;• XV.X I.X- -xX-ft®'--. x ‘ ■ V'/XXv ’^XV,:.x-: ..•®--xx.-.y..= .x:fX: hti. x^sfi'a mmm- rnmgm fl I XV ■-"■x.; gem ■xT^x ■-'• ' x;x®®4 aliyiKX;- rxOi£s^M ’ i'X Xx'- ’: ' it liiiiiX.X.Vi ::X:x.X®;-- .; :'X :x -: -X-V-X .; •x;'#x-'x. .;x#x:;. mm mmmm'mm • •" .. •’-‘•x •■; -, - ♦. '■ / w- ••••■'^ -^xMx.-•vxy'pivr;- X:.V®X-X ■-X ;XvXx xxc:X*=-x x®-:*-£x.vV '■ y.^*:mmmm. :X •®x*:'®--:i;.. Xx-. X x:/". .: :®X"X X::;-XX’. X.-y; ■ ■.: V '. ”v ■:-y x;.. .. .•-.x ; X ■ :■■! . r ■ ?;'X-:;■ ■■•••; . ■- -'X-y • X. X- ..■■•.'■ ■ . ^ X '^X\' : ■ '^ ' .: -xX-xx^- ^ -X.:- • :•• • ■Xx:XXh:< ®-*XXX-X:x:®. te-x ;xXf ■ •"•■ ■ ' ■•. • V ■x"'x' ^®-’X- *»XX“* ■X'‘. X-' : yy.X t:;.; *5^** • • r.". t ■ -" ‘V- 'f'm-i t T JiD ^ ^ i-. ' -••'• , ■%-m. t ;.v^ v ^ -,y= -•■' ■■ ^t' ■■■M-';v-' uft 1?' :te - ■: ■-•v ■■■::; ■ . -V^'y-A ^ ;,-.--!y > .■■ k : ' ■^■; m V ♦1^' ii^ . it - ym. : -^n ^ g > £3|> m 5» La »XI mM X r- 2j:g5rEm 6 M M M MM fIo< ^Hr>> o ••9Kr*'jIIS»m m r* oe «<4 5»5* « ^r§ f ^§E ifl 1A t* ►* 2 ''X M V« fO Ml Ng 2m 4m Ir* iM oo f*o r- ^ i: i 3 01 Ml N s &3 S 111 I!e>sIi3 m ^ So o•- *-*Ml "M IIMMS>1^I Iy* Is! »5* 8 IMo M m i-i X r E P8S^m o M 9 t Ml Ml ^ ix ^ M -*4 Ir» M '^8i\> r«« Ml e Ml ? §1 Ml •< Ml H Ml X H is;Sis!S C 8 o <SSm<i ? 1Mlr* O'1 psr;Ml m S M ■» Ml Ml ^ 2x pmt 5®r* o •s4 1 M 1 fM I- m M ur Ml *— M fr- Ml am Ml ►«» Ml O M O m O l8 O M •- Ml r-ors>m 3 Isfn * o M .■■■/^- i;- :;w- I i Ik':---:. -:■'■■■■:::■ ■ V : C-[:. •■,^- {■■»■-■ .”4' Wm'■■■"■ :■¥ (,,!'W|!P,mxmm.ii 'y.y- ""iv- : .-V■ --'V ■ ':: ■•• ■■■.' •c^. *•■'.. _........................................... fetiJiP' "K’-';■ ' :' • rv* ■■:::vV'-V; • ;•?■-: -■ t!.'?.;. . ■ •r-*.;r--, •'• -V^- "i}. ■.■•■■■ yy'^Mdlr'y\ • . = -v-V^V *5*' p:^^^- .-A V ^ M'fmi ^‘v:yf.yy Mm ••• , !■. V-:=y^. 4 v:..'- "1:mmlA: P"why: pfiSI ' ■■■•*■■ ■’M. f ih- lP®’pr'2ilidll<", ::••:• • .V i"‘•a P^' mmmm^:■ • ••: ■ .-. :.: vV- •:'• ■ -.'- -X .-- rh’Kyy "y- y ^ ; /.-•A - "'.• ^ •. •;- mhh y-yny:.m : r y-l -. ,•,;-v- ^v' .’•■Sip. •i«L ;.y... : .. •.•.•??.^^r.3:-■y'^ ■ y-'-.'^-y-yh^z-yy hmy y y-- ■ • •' ■■•.. = . ■ yy-my-i yyi ■■fe-’' ;" :,-y ■ ■my M ■::'■>•■'4 '■:■'■-y y'--- - i- y.■'■'■ ''1<;-:V'*.. " :;'.:;®/.; ■,,:/-■;.■■ 7.-- m ■"■'■■ /'• -;■;■' ,.'. .. •.! ■ ■ ■ y -I - ■ . - ■•!’■’’ ' •’•••;• ■ >■-* ' :. ■ . • . ■ •*..••• .•-..., y'.hyyy.h : r-yy--'y:y • hhhyyih- ■ ■; ' v::" \; yhf:yyyy:yy:yy-.<: *:-;.i yhMi^yf'h:'' m ' -""'- 'y ■ * wk i! .1 m: ■m- •'■:••T iWw^, M : ■■:■:* myy * •■ • . . --yti.. ;•••:•.•••. . •■ . m: --y"■ i -t . y. -:-y* t. mmi ii r- ■m-yi-myl -.: ■■'. •• • V- i”-*^-;t. - •*.P*v Mis?"Mi®-:miMoM rsH*] H^V;'^ ■. ■;’ i.''-’:;S^i '■: ■ ■■4Si,: i-■ -•...; ;• •. ' -y . •.. : ;?^s;:=i :VSiiVSilpjv-:-.ia ■ V't-. • . .. ^;/^. i'i'siiJ ..■•••ft;.,."i-sfftmi ' ■'•■/r...: m .• ^ .i S’S'.•;'■'■''-S mrmmm-mm ^“3-,S ■ ^: - ' -mm m • ' .: s:".s-.3.^'at/. •.■ i£m :S.- 33. ..:.. ,'v* ;.:; - ■ 1.• --Wri mimmm mm ■: 3:;c: •#/3i ?. V ^ t|S ^iv■ ii -~''^~\‘r^ ■ '•iiffllftii-- ?'v:33:,;..^ 's-/■•;>.••:,?•. I ,r.>ir'- y ■•’■ C" '^ ' A 9k ;‘s *‘v Heirill kyn^ laitB M-NM. SM^a J««iiry 28. 1988 C1t> of Orono U3J> S<wth 8ro*<n Roaa Orono. 55391 Attention: Jeenn* Jtobwith Ac I1T4 fill'll Qft-117-23-41-0034 Dmt Jeinito* p„r.u.n to ~r i tM «i. .f ih« p'p'*''‘»= 06-117-23-41-0029 06-117-23-41-0033 06-117-23-41-0034 coowly kro«. .« 41»« C4l< O"™' Tho«t R. «<>!.»» u tPRper dec^on of the Court rendered t>ec«-ber 22, 1987. P,eate for«rd to ™ 'p^?tK” of constructing • home on s«1d property, dno 7 infonriation. Very truly ycurs. Susan Dailey Realtor SD/me .,,. cc: Mr. Thomas R. William^ •, -V.- * 'V'- ■"■:■■ . •V3"'S3 ■ :N -v-:i. . ■•■ ■■ -■; i;r?<:.^S:; ^ i ‘.:.t .• .. .3. *'•'#3 .;...•. :Sl.; '. r.';- S .si itV :ir:3 vc;-t s.^ h si nis^,./ ;i.s s s :. = * • ^i»'d =8 I r-23-41-0029. r-23-41-0033. Q6 t1 iT~ CITY OF FJNAMCE QFFICt 1350200000 0 Ct cm 75.0b 75.00 YOU tortcn.7 K/2i^S not included on le (home) 473-2631^ Phone (work) 473-1536 Plymouth, Mn. Zip? 55447 le (home) Phone (work) Zip: (month/year) parcels of land Residential ler (specify) Construction Cost $ guested for minimum buildable Tot size ___ Hardcover Side ____Rear)fmm : ■■■■■ ■ ': without wartance »1i«code WrfTuir------- none other than site-------- mmOIRED SXntVLTTMM Coapleted Application «marm Certified Property Ownerf thle list fro* Hennepin County Department StamsidV l«9*l envelopes (110) | Siliro^ the above list with no ^turn obtained with property o*7'^*Certificate of survey including hardcove- ^J^^raphic survey (e.isting and propose in existing grade are proposed. Plat Hap (obtained with pros«rty o'^'ars Si an addendum to this P/t env other persons you wish notified of t AdditiMMl items ss rtay be requested^by The" Applicant and Property Owner must sig remem^r that your variance ^plication information has net teen included. _ _ _ _ Certification by Zoning Department that Varia Zoning official’s Signature_ APPLICMIT’S SIGHATORB ..la- The applicant hereby 5® rator. a^ requested by the Zoning ,;i« the information supplied ia true am knowledge. Applicant ’s Signatur¥x OmnSRS SIGMATOHB .arees ^The owner hereby ackowledqes 9 •.it-hnrizes reasonable entry onto the proper aoent,, CoiwlMion nenbers, «nd Council Jlon .nd verification of thi. requMt. Owner's Signature _______________ ADDUcant*mu8t have all submittals into the cermtission Meeting. reiiew meetings of the Planning Commission a unable to attend a scheduled meeting, plea authorised agent attend in your place and Office of this change prior to the meeting. mmm *TriiT3 -Wm';v:v ■iim iiiit KSsEi''S^p: iHtM ■ Isi- ■ ^ Wmmmmrn -m mn <PS-iA-h^' ■ il® . ^'vT-m ..•lii*-.'.jl.,.v- -■m m k-. itions:Suiwnit Park must be legally permit. osed for Lot 1, Block 4, the future, the owner must eek credit of the principal no variances will be granted roperty based on this current physical development of this a the private drive located I continue to be maintained by veway and it is the future ipKeep and maintenance of that mmi:: i :'' ' •*_r ; ;; : f • •• V ■. r- WM. h:'( 7'*!; .-i.. ; ; ■ ■ ■ ■ \ .. . tv - - ^ ::: r : ; V ;; •' * . .. 11, mmmm -i mm MMJ ^:^yy'yyy 7' ■ ' ' .■■■■'■ |i' '; l^j:. — M '.:. ■ ,; • •... ^-v : ■ >. .; .:; V,.- cm OP • VAR »#4-2 4 8Pee slso.oir«. <So»bunOt'OTT LOCATICJf«AJ7*it. °»> »"«>-.glg£-------M.n>.H4i:ga. „ ,roe*tty idtntificatlon Bu»b«r (y.I.o.) W-J1'- cirrflFom rutmoFna im*me •M fiOf ^ nx; Please check one - Property JL_ ebetract or Attach le^l description to appllcatloa if not Included on required survey. ______ ___________..—•——.—-----yy-***”—*••*““”* Phone (AppucAirr r471»2631 ■.;; ■ y rHOHAS R. MILLIE. <»♦Phone (work)_.fi2lH^ 1831 Tut Uns Worth_______ l”uf different than applicant) Phone (hoa«)------ S#>€_________________(work) Iip» 55447 • -t-U yy® y*jC‘T ' •• ■<■ ••■j Addresst City*Zip:m Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the^adjaeent^^rcela of la^ nmsiarr oss op pwmwrtt Preaent Zoning District „, - - - Present Use of Property _______vacant Residential - v:-. fy^'V mm other (apecify) dbscriptioh of RIQOIST Estimated Construction Cost $, z ^ 4. 41 variance requested for minimum bulldable lot tire Describe request in detain, varunce requv_---------------------------------------------- VARIARCBS RRQOIRED X Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front ___ Hardcover Side _____Rear)Y.-v^yy; \ -:i:' 4;. ■; y; ;y ; .y . ■ m: {.■ y. • -s- r • ■■■ ■ ^"-•yyyy^jf^.v":'/'-yy ■■'■ V, r-4?*iy .- •* » iilfl l^y b .J ure on Lot 1» lation to allow Exhibit J >wed hardcover tie lot would :reet, variance , the propoaal the immediate rtion of right- by the roadway It application recent review, ;inue on with lolved. Tt is grading of Oak roperty owners Lie improvement nprovement. 1 3 who contend he property to ership of the parcel to the al application and 1979 for ndments of the view. sewer stub has ecent lot area the immediate 1, Block 4, because it is Zoning File #124S March 10, 19t0 Page 3 of 3Approval is subject to the following conditions:1. Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Minnetonka Sum»it Park must be combined prior to issuance of a building permit.T# arcesBorv structures are proposed for Lot 1, Block 4, Smmil P.tk .t ti~ in th. apply for a special lot combination to seek credit of the principal itructure on combined Lots 1 snd 2. ^ owner is claced on notice that no variances will be granted for the residential developiaent of this property based on this current n'dinrno difficulti.. with th. phytlc.I d.v.lop^nt of thl. property. 4 Access to the site shall remain via the private drive located iithin a public dedicated right-of-way to continue to the property owners served by such driveway and it J Jhit wner^t resj onsibility to share in the upkeep and siaintenance of th driveway. L Administrator 7" oak Street - Lon 5 (B) additional 6»500 s.f» within Improved platted right-of-way \ Application No. 480 Current Application itions Issued to Adjacent of Oak Street ^ the sole and legal owner of area and lot width variance profile. AS in the 1969 and to allow the sale of the lot specifically provide the Staff is aware that this is e we are not dealing with a a to deal with the physical in the past lot area and lot s and has continued to do so bit G, the building envelope ting the average lake?iir>re for the principal structure, also shown on the accessory keshore setback line will be of the site. toning File I1248 March 10« Ittt Fage 2 of )If a future developer plane to construct an accessory structure on Lot 1, Block 4, the owner would have to execute a special lot combination to allow for 1* 5 credit of the principal structure on Lots 1 and 2. Exhibit J designates the various lakeshore setback tones and the allowed hardcover amounts within each one of those tones. Develofsment of this lot would aix>ear «ruite consistent with adjacent property at 4125 Oak ^treetf variance review approved by the City 4/11/13. Also review Exhibit H* the proposal appears consistent with recently a^roved building sites In the immediate Siannit Park neighborhood. Access to the property is via the umlmproved platted section of right- of-way of Oak Street. Three existing residences are served by the roadway now maintained by residents (rsview Exhibit I). The current application would now add an additional unit for ^ total of four. In a racent ravim. Planning CoinBission members stated that they could not continue on with this review until the final improvesient of Oak Straat was resolved. It is the City's position that vKere will be no improvement or upgrading of Oak Street until the City receives s petition from all four property owners •Biting for that upgrading. The City will not initiate s public improveiBent project unless all involved property owners also sesk the improvement. I have been contacted by at least two of those property owners who contend that they do not want anything changad within tha area. For tha official racord, the applicant does not own the property to the north. The property to the nor*-h remains in the ownership of the former Mrs. Williams. Applicant has no control ovar the parcel to the north. Steff RecosHMndatlon - To approve the lot area and lot width variances renewal application for Th^aa R. Williams based on the following findingsi 1, The property received approval by the City in 1969 and 1979 for the same variances. There have been no addition or amendments of the Zoning Code that would alter the findings of the 1979 review. 2. The property has been assessed one sewer unit and a sewer stub has been provided for the property. 3. The development of this sit. .s consistent with recent lot area and lot width variances granted to lots within the immediate surrounding neighborhood. 4. 6»500 s.f. of additional area is provided in Lot 1» Block Minnetonka Summit Park, although cannot be credited because it divided by the umimproved right-of-way. wm Sr •... i-., h.* Wi .mm- .-1 lime I'f.-. ^ :.s'; ■ -Mm : • V- .v;: \ --rx.- ^ fn... - m«.Planning C^sil**lon Chair»Ml^ll«y Oronc PliBolnq Co>Hii®*io*' (•••b*!'# City #ubiini«tr«tor Barnhardaon :Vr%:iui'y.■ h:;■ ; v;;,. .i■: ■ : ■ :■ :-y ■■■■■■ ■■■■ 7• : •^ = - . '.. ;.v. - ■■■’,’ . -.V- ■■• ■ ••'•••Vi;; -:• " ■••5v: . . ■;■ :• -:jaanna h, Mabuath, Building t Boning Ad«ini»trator March 10, 19M Sublactt I124I Thowi* ». WilU»». ^r., •4iat» ©alt Btraat Variances “ Public Bearing Soainf Dlatrlct - lb-IB IPartiaBnt OrdinBacaa ■ Section 10.24, SuMlviaion 5 (B) u>t *r.. * IJj ’iV' ,5r.crir*«Jdltlon.l ».5«0 ..*. -Ithln 1, Block 4^ alviawl by unloptoved plattwl rl9ht-of-».y of Ridge Place) V^^iance “ 19,160 ■•£. or 436 Itot Width Required - 140* Adjacent or Road • 75* Variance • 65' or 46% Adjacent to Shoreline ■ 95* Variance • 45* or 2% • • .* •*> • List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit 1 - Exhibit J - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Council Minutes of 7/20/69 Origlnal**Survey Submitted With Application No. 480 Updated Survey Submitted W*th Current Map/Survey of Variance Applications Issued to Adjacent Properties , ^Map of Unimproved Right-of-way of Oak Stree^ Hardcover Analysis -4 a, a tuildabl. lot. Th. s?SI Is ?Mt thl. 1. “Tobir ^o'c ”iToL!L5Sn no aealio, -itb a V*' ;*otihffirt^b:i,st‘Jot'^r.a^s r!Lc« *irthout"?or^/buildlS? plan, and ‘enJelopl -bi:s‘"d^s:nrb:5 n‘^!i:llia‘Er;otofth«TLudlnr*nva;:pe°is -is^ "’“^Jback'Jtne'Snr"^lot divided by Ridge Place. The average lakeshore setback line will be staked prior to Planning Commission inspection of the site. •i- ' 4 • y ■:■. ■' ■ ■ \ Mmlmm Si-y - .'Vi;■■■■ ^ f; ■•» ■ :kurimmmk Zm :i -Vi;KWFmim:s &V '.v:i iUA.CimRiii1^-^Jmm.- >r:'.■■:■■■.:< •■;*;.•i^v ■'"'•i ■.; .>i&»i I iH'mk:'0^:^ :--V-":: - K* ’ • V • V .. • .•*.• ; -. V- .' w:-- J,!-T-, r■ . m^ki W'nf> ■Ek^iy ■ v:>^v=: :", rmv 1 kmmM mk: . ■ V.* V -;- >:»;‘ i 'W^k k' ■ % kpkkXkymkkk '.^.■ 'V ’- -r^i ‘V• V? • vv ,k-mkmmikmkk-ki0iM:^kkk0kk& m§ym^ V.VV- '. ., : ; - % i' •• • / mi ^.: *:v V-'-" = ■;•:•: V' .;•. ■ !.:=...V WPm-v'i---:.K.-vr-:^y'A kkrkik kmki ■■ V y-'mk^y’'r iv:v :' ?^'ivV=E-m Wy ^ , . : * ■•wmv: i :'^1^:: ■: r ;*:- ■' •%wry fiE-12 ET“mm TO- : .>-.=s;:i- ■ ■ ,-i.V’''- .-ism ^ i 'nr •-"" J: -I •»^r!|fr5|PFr~‘' * 1.<i: i •‘ '-i-.v .\. :’’■■•■ ■''•'•U^'^‘ *-'* ■ ■;t- ^: . R:«a:^:- V r ^ ;-. ■ '■ :T • ■ ■■ , ;.- m amp ^ mm .^^'v;f... v.:-R r: ■ ■-•■' vil mMi Fl«-,v litimiil ■.' j ; ■ ' ■ miia PisOim m^m 1 mmm\V : ;VV.':iRK; B " m&m "■SRiwmmm'■^'- •• " ^ x;:R-R i.;=.- WiS ap j>vyy.'j«R;^v.fRR *y ■ m::mi ■V ■•„■ • r^: [■ '■rr}y'-^^ ..'w,-::=•; vv '• ^ i-.■■' • . ■/ ■m". - ‘■\.: i- ■ ■''■:■ :' ■■ V-'R ■ . . Mi-y\ -■■ y' .ii-y-: wm y] W-J-: ■'■::-:S^y ■•■ R.V.. ; .. V-; ■■••.’ 1 ..... .J•^^■' ^ ■ 0\• • •. :. •m. .•• .** . 'mp■R ; :. •*yTO.v:;•• . s' . =• •■•^.; .;; s'.,•••; ..: "■M}■■• ; ■ H PI* pw riTii* PTW PTC* wm • . V V.: .♦.;. *,Ni'•■ :ryyy: yy^yyi:'- • -;-yRy:»r "i :' wwLfe9?m . A:::VRR: y ■ ^ r: ::-.Ml.\i 'y v;. :v;,:-:\;i:yRyR^-V:j| * iMy mt ■■V>-r'yR: - .'\ :;■' RR-'m yyym ^^'JSrR.=.RR00 •' i::-^R-R>iR0.0RR':-:: .■ 1.': '■*■■.'■. ■ y VR". ■•. . I^RR;■■ .'rR::. B^:'-' ■ ■ ; ■i ' ^K-iF^yR .■ .:: '•'>.' .RR/r:-:-.yR'^'jv*y/RRrRv.*f^^^ ■.,rR'RRRR’'r ■ . . R;' •' ■’r;-. y R4::-RRR'?RR-y#;%vy.yyR:RR'i?R:-.i'-:: ;: y.R^ R;•;. ^ Ry;R:R, y sUmmmm^ Ps|Irr R,.' - ■■>';'■. Rr; .: .-W0 RfA ^- y-fyayl I. : ^■*'^=^.^RR- A 1^ ' ■* 1.^-..-f“l:..•■■■'il1.: •• 1;•■=•• .■• .,.•••• •■-v :;• • _; ' _■;■ •: ■: ■ ^ '■■■4 •laKfe'i'. .■: ■ , •• • ' . ••: ■ :•% . •• ■•. :■■■'■ ■\:-SSv= v;,: ..V-: r ;tVi>V;.'V; w& s;r -.^r: ty ’ . ..r • • • • :*V i “ s •.•: •*' . .>*»f . **..•iiitfc”'' • - C-7zoto55 - U o Q m ^ tn H M O h~* u Od M u toz U4 fta V-.’ ;l a I H <I CO tou:CO LU 5: CJu M o rsj M oSO Qm F-i 02 O to M 313 U > O UJ rJ.O CO ^ M O fU H W d« Z M 13iJa J 0 Zo M o w a. to z M lO pS ui se :c H to U4 U) H odtuswu s H M U) to H tu O 10 o (m3 H to Z M Z U1 CI4 O U) ° g (-4 H u3 a iJ > oM P UJz H V> . V • ■■ V■:o' •'■v:^ ••V-- . ■.-; .-•:: .y■' -■ -■.'■■.fJ59-- ■; • -3- - ^ '■ ■-,. ;.^v,.■y':/: '• 'v -a\ . :.ym ii#i mimsmmmmM : ■•■X-,l^,-i^^;..?yi ■ 0 y;. r " . «/:: •■ ■•■-.i-v |r-^' mmomtsBS:ite mMBm k:^ ■;•■•••.•••'••■m v-;’S 7V:; vv j'Si a 3*i mmmM 55 2 « S.-6| W •- 0.*o „ 0»5 w E 5" 5» CtO 3 -0 2 a>T°- «.2* ^ o> (u ^Q. - a o) ^ — to^ o 2* c 7; oi g iJ 0^2 ^ ^•f- p (u cx ^U w- r- > O to O C O ’*o — ^ — 20) £ o»< -O e 052 o.^ i*° o1^ £ <L> to 4-o Q. c p » o ■" JC o ^2.2 c 5^ l^HjPljSM :'.;J.^ ;\|.V;>•.•>.= .: " '^C-11 0:--- .: v::"-L^. ; .\,*.y, •.*.*.'• ^^^.****' ;>V5^: fee v:'v:,;.•■/.,." ■■'■'!' '■ '■• :• ■ • .•■;•: ■;• '.. •. . .■ . ■ . > : ;v'- ■■•. mm vs- feir-'' ■., ; \f c- vv; e ... ■■ --r^'.o..,«..- .?r:; it- • :v ■»• -; it'i^rWlffilitf.' .' iS• y<. • , .B LIQUID CAPACITY OF R PROPER CONSTRUCTION ITY, SEE DETAIL F7. USE THRU PUMP TANK. URV FLOAT SWITCH AND ILS F7 AND F13 & BLOCK HEAD) -2” ELBOWS, 2 - 2» TEE3 5** RED., 3 - 1.25" TEES, (ALT. LOCATION) i E14.• i ERF § 3* INT. AS PER E12 D CAP - 6 ) LEAN ROCK -19 TONS 37 TONS ARDS. [ PUMP TANK BIRST. )UT DRIVING THEREON. TO ROLL INTO "WIRE”) > TO REQUIRED SHAPE. TOP r TRACKS TO DRIVE ON TOP.mmm ■■ .i " V ^ ,T TURN OFF LEVEL AND SO ; ABOVE TURN OFF LEVEL. if ■ ; ^ - ) GALLONS MUST REMAIN C PIPE AS A RESERVE. I i 0^ .. : : ..I mmrnmmmnmmimm I*.iX. ■ :-M ' ' ' JV - '.yv ^■" v. A 0-:\ .■..>■■■:■.. •.■• ■'. - ■ ■>.-; m'xim fsmmm- c-ii '•':••■ ■■:. ■ !. J »»»::-y}■:■■:Ki "Vl•;.•v.:f,-;d■^r:■i:, ■ •v;..v IT’ ■ '■' t.. . ■■■..■■■■ Is V i V:'if* •- i^-:kL®«i ■: ;;r..Tri g’/-*v ■•.;;••• S=-': Wm .vfc^-?:V:;i ;i/ -:=;J ^::SiS:»te'fefeilb |-^vv=;- L.\ Vi :;.:=•<^•^T>-V':.. ::■;;vV®®:v:■'pi:, ". : ,.?.■ ■ ■'n^ 1r :a ||p||||P|P^;^#•^mS:p:p..::P::;::^pm>■>: ■..</ 'my: v--:-f^®i-v3:^;..;.';-.V-. ■:;. .-i'-y ^Hnvv’;i'mmm i.. ■ > i;:.-.V-.. •:>..■.••!' ’vV"' :; ..< . .>'*•. , .x' rh:-- ■If’--: :\V r If - ^' ^’1: -■■"■"- V pi;®- :^ --U- •»•■■,::•; PV:;vrf .;;^--Vi-, --v ■y.'yy wm ■::®a K' -&:mm .y [:; • K-"-:'-"'. * •■”•. :i ' ^- ’i. V -''v-a ■■::■ •■■ y, v;-X-.-'tv'-m'-OILL OF MATiRIAtS 7. SAND (WASHED) - LOAMY SAMO FILL * 1. A PftlNAItY AMD A SfeOVCAfiY flPTIC TAHlt WITH LIQUID CAPACITY OP 790 GALLOWS lACS. 8tl KTAIL C7 ATTMUIO FOR PHOPER COHSTRUCTICMf. a. A POXPIWS TAJnt or 7S0 gallows liquid capacity, Sll DETAIL F7. 3. 4« PVC HOUSE SEWER PIPE, AS REQO., mOM ROUSE THRU PUMP TAMK. 4. 1/a HP SUBMERSIBLE PIDIP EQUIPED WITH MERCURY FLOAT SWITCH AMD AUDIO AMD LIGHT ALARM INSIDE HOME AS PER DETAILS P7 AND F13 ( BLOCK (CAPABLE OF DELIVERING 27 GPM AT 37 FEET OF HEAD) 9. 2* PVC PRESSURE LINE - 109 PIET, !• UNION, 3 - 2" ELBOWS, 2-2" TEES 2» BENDS AS REQO. IN PRES. LINE, 3 - 2" X 1.25" RED., 3 - 1.25" TEES, 4 <• 1.25" CAPS, ASSQCBLED AS PER DETAILS E12 (ALT. LOCATION) & E14. S - 1.25" PVC LATERALS 17 • LONG WITH 1/4" PERF • 3’ INT. AS PER E12 (PERFORATIONS PER LATERAL INCLUDING ONE IN END CAP - « ) S2 TONS, 19 TONS. 3/4* TO 2.5" CLEAN RQC8 TOPSOIL 19 TONS 37 TONS •. HAY AMD PEBMEABLS FABRIC TO COVER 50 SQUARE YARDS. INSTALiATION NOTES: 1. DO NOT DRIVE ON THE PROPOSED TREATMENT AREA H 2. INSTALL PRESSURE LINE TO CENTER OF MOUND FROM PUMP TANK FIRST. 3. USE BACKHOE TEETH TO ROUGHEN MOUND AREA WITHOUT DRIVING THEREON. (DO NOT ATTEMPT THIS WHEN SOIL IS WET ErOUGH TO ROLL INTO "WIRE") 4. USE CRAWLER TRACTOR WITH BUCKET TO PLACE SAND TO REQUIRED SHAPE. TOP OF SAND MUST BE LEVEL, PLACE SAND IN FRONT OF TRACKS TO DRIVE ON TOP. 5. SET MERCURY FLOAT SO THAT PUMP IS SUBMERSED AT TURN OFF LEVEL AND SO THAT PUMP TURNS ON WHEN 129 GALLONS ARE ABOVE TURN OFF LEVEL. 6. SET ALARM ACTIVATOR 3" ABOVE TURN ON 450 GALLONS MUST REMAIN ABOVE THIS ACTIVATOR TO THE SEPTIC TANK INLET PIPE AS A RESERVE. P'-\Pymmmm 'mfy ■; ij mpy ;.' ?*■ .' ■ -:V* : ■ V tyy y/^; ■- ■•. K ■■■■.' ■'■■ I®;:.r ; :•■ -v'i>4ste*«mrnmd ^¥^PPS&- i'i■ •'•?• .• ; ^ .. 4*pe access through the top svel can be measured. The id at opposite ends of the es should provide access distribution system that Luent. ibric, loamy sand backfill r the system as shown in ary and secondary septic e listed in the bill of e sewer should be 1 foot equipped with a pump as tie. The pump shall be :h, as shown in attached pump on when 25% of the iback quantity of effluent ;he tank and will turn the : remain in the tank. The I block such that the top the lowest 18 inches of n will be located at a and will warn using both reaches 3 inches above the jacity as specified, shall te alarm actuation level. 9 tank are Illustrated in in evaluating this data. s Cll, C7, F17, F7, F13, ion Tests and Site Plan m. ■ ■ mm v::£fmmMrnB : v: JiV'-V 7/ ■ .. -.a'...' a , 6:.■ ■ ; km. : m “teas-'?! ■■•■i ■ *m-M .... : . -y Tfiwnmm .•7 •^:V :.= •■ a'■■■9Lm-m.' ■■ ■■: ■ .'j!' , I ^IWPIUJ■Vv a- ■ 'W--Kl mmymsm-■<I ■■■‘SS SMmm''' / •=7: : Mi ; • -j, ■ *3i ||fv ;.^ mm'"'-'' VV a-; t^a^:a .... . ^ '■■ ■■ = ..• .e . - ■••'' '7 --‘-Mmmmrn•iiij*] I :.J^ -1 . .* Kf ... .■•.•' • .mm^- m: ■y ■ ■ '■;■•• mmm m&M?V^;.:V:. ;•• V i/ '•'•w; v:my7 mm,MM mm m '• ■■■.;y r-:' •■• Sipirn:mM fy- isets;rn-m-tfr ■ : 1.7* A.:-- c:--.- •... -..•i.-: : i •;;-»-^..>;7-■..; ;■ .7:'.. ..a:..a... • ■.::=»•-•••.• .-.,. • y-: - - ■' - a: a;,;.,,. ; .:... , i''.':a- /y.'':'-.x y> y ■ a.: •V. . -a v/a'-*- -s; -'■ ..- Mlai $a^!K3aa..i - M mmmy m .u S.4 y : y .; ;• :"■ vV';..., V“a ...ar |i:a;a':.*i-m yy-mm r.vv.--vm ^rnsm■■ mm-.: :: - a:.--;: ;. ■^rn.-.pmtimrnr:|y-- - m Uly-- ■• a.'; a. ■ '. - tnaaC-kSS mm ft" ,te and we have attached ( and a site plan sketch sill layout are as follows: o avoid driving on the te mound area to prevent over and compacting the nusable for a disposal the center of the mound as shown in attached id as shown in detail F17 .8 provided. This pipe :khoe sitting ffutside the nd area shall be broken up f washed sand outside of ea roped off during sand ind reguired is listed in ick mounted tractor with sand minimum in front of r the tractor to ride on 3und area. The completed shall be the minimum sand isign sheet. Outside the fard at a 4 horizontal to if the rock bed to the :k bed are listed on the 5 of rock are listed in /4” to 2 1/2" rock shall :e. Do not drive on the ( of delivering rock is ng enough chute but the ore loading rock so that s in place, connect the and assemble laterals as of the rock. The size, als and perforation size ched design and bill of 1 rock placement with the M • «;•■ ..m . '-V , fSff; ^ ■■■ if;/-;. ■' ■ :.;^v Rill tnspecticm •> Provide inspection pipe access through the tofu of the mound so that the liquid level can be measured. The inspecti«t pipes should be installed at opposite ends of the mouiKl rx>ckbed. The inspection pipes should provide access directly into the portion of the distribution system that contains or is ment to contain effluent. Cover Bay, a permeable plastic fabric, loamy sand backfill and topsoil shall be used to cover the system as shown in details E3 siwl E14. Tanks - The capacity of the primary and secondary septic tanks snd of ths pumping tank are listed in the bill of Bksterials. The grade on the h<Hise eewer should be 1 foot per ICK) feet. The tank shall be equipped with s pump ae specified in the bill of materials. The pump shall be •ctuated by a mercury float switch, as shown in attached detail ri3, that will turn the pusp on when 25% of the estimated daily flow plus the drainback quantity of effluent ere above the lo«rest it inches in the tank and will turn the pump off when IS inches of effluent remain in the tank. The |HUDp will be supported on concrete block such that the top of the pump will be just below the Icw'cst 18 inches of effluent in the tank. An alarm will be located at a conspicuous place inside the home and will warn using both light and sound when the effluent reaches 3 inches above the piwp turn on level. A reserve capacity as specified, shall be provided in the tank above the alarm actuation level. The details of the pump and pumping tank are illustrated in attached detail F7. Xf we may be of further assistance in evaluating this data, kindly contact us at your conveniance. Sincerely, ADVANCE SURVE^bOG t W [GINEERING CO. imes H. Parker P.E. t L.S. ,nn. Lie. No. 9235 No. 208 'resident Attachments: Design Sheet; Bill of Materials; Details Cll, C7, F17, F7, F13, E12, E14, and E3; Boring Logs; rercolatlon Tests and Site Plan mm , I;,r. .-V-:.; - j mmmm- ^ V-.** • • •-. ■ ::mL^'jjj. X' ' : 'immpp:-^' -V •;:»mir K: . ' ? ':V'..■..- . ■■.■--■■■‘*':^4&j9l • • .'. V '•-•*• ■•' ■-' '* ■• • ■•.'•?-^ X- '.X y ■ : '^'o V '' ' ■ ' ■ ■ V'* ^ ■■ ti'A .;-e.. - . : H h^ ' •V .1 t J* .-• ' . : ' : :%ili AsaiKK '■»«*»'■ 3= M '■ V- f-v ■ ■ :•/:: --.v;:^ ■> X-cJ.'~:r. a: -■■ :■. :■■:.;^ t • •. •; a • ;v: tf/ - ^-• a . .'^rt ;'V.'->-a a • . ' ' k ■ 'I 'v^ava-. ::r^\,: ■ iMa;. >a =V-'.v^a;v P;: : • ^b'' ■' V-. . ■ - a"..' ;>: -X X-: - i xr--.A •■vi:-:. ■'! v-' r ':.'^ ' a ■': . ■:,•;•?■ a •<^.‘v a ; :’aS>:-a.'/a'’'a ;’v: aag^'€a. ::a:»Vaa.= a- 'a'-' a-, V,'. ..■ ;•• .:;, V: ■.• W •;Va-N^.v.v-' -a- ■^■. -■■:aaa -;aa ;:• a- . , V.- . a. • " .a-a a/a/":, J aa a • •■^‘ r<"a iiiiiiii.fc.ai-iiB^B. r«:o-.nd . «««»t?*iS °S; itVil. ot th. .y.t» uyout .« .. toUo«:■ T~”«sSd w *c«" ^ systm. ni 4-^ % 5" niM froa th« puap to tho c»nt«r of tho »oun^ Sin cokl«et to . 2- ” ,|;^"ln "d.tnr?!? shall be the first thing instslleo. 1^.—,.nnt, - Mith ■ trictor backhoo olttlnq guUldl ttio t;. iu5f.c.“ru-o *.und .«. .h.u >» brox.o up vising the tssth of the buctst* u w ^ .s>w4 - rwii iver truck loads of washsd sand wtsidi ;?LS ”.?rS Sr .S“-?.!! £!i:k.\“to Uy ““ono ^~t <*y« on l«.rtilcknes. .p.clfl«l on tho d.sign ^ ‘J* rJLVt,^ «... .lop. th. *roJk b.d°«*thS1 vertical slope from tho top of the rocK existing surface. Miidntrp‘rni-\-v.r«^^^^ vd r -itr. ro^,,°'ono"u^f*/ni?\ truck must be thoroughly cleaned before loading roc s no cement remains# -S ‘?!ia- to““tr. p°uV°lfno‘q'’.fle =Vu? ?en^?ns",nrnu^.Vs' oTt^^s. “te?.^. .nd P«toration six. remaining 4 inches of rock. vW . '> :“■?■' .* a f^a a.^a";t>''y"-;;::aavattviv.v :ak::s:/yt::;a#^Va..,a. V.: •• • ^• ^^y-ffxXXy/'XXiS^'Xix/cy^ymyxrxxx yyr-'^yyy.y:;c:-:: y* ■y-^ -y'y^^£fy:iyym }. ■P^pr ■ ^[I©^iD^(i[f^ •i'iki -r.y *?; P» pmrnmmmmm Bwj.!<!tes -'ii. ■' V'.' /■: *3! ■ ■: %•■■■ *.V^ jff:vu'; • u-B mm -y T-:. : :-;=^ ■>j.. -aikip- --Mi^'i>w-• \ ' •■ •• ■ . • \ / V •• ^ ■-o; ” ■ ••■• • .v:-7; •^A ■ :-’'-i'■*•; ir''-; 'iJ:V:-... ,;..v-:r :=-;-a-v-. . \.^.- 'ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING^COMU Ca^ Itkm ilia, n »41tFebruary 29, 1988 Robert Posthuaus 24200 Hatches LaJcewvilla, »* 55044 Dear Robert: At your r«iu..t we have conduct.! en Investigation ot eoU conditions on a proposed! building site designate oVono site is located at Big Island on Lake Minnetonka in Oron , Minnesota. The investigation was to deteraine the f •oils on site and to check for the presence of a high water table “ evidence Of ^ttled .oil that night Indict. . .eesonelly high, fluctuating water table. The investigation consisted of explorato^ soil J^Jere identifying soil texture and water conditions. The borings w taken at the locations indicated on the attached site plan. IMVBSTICaTIOil MBTHODS: Percolation tests and one or more deep borings were the locations indicated on j ii^pector'sborings and tests are attached for your installer and inspector s reference. RESULTS! Because the attached boring logs reveal the presence soil and/or high water tabic at a high level in the borings, a conventional system will not furxtion at the proposed site. , I iiijiiwiiN» N SITE SYSTEM DESIGN FOR ROBERT POSTHUHUS \Ss 1 N«t I OBBBuJlii m Wwky-:i 5;? • •♦ •.* •. • *. •• V .* m W- ;:.:V,:.^-.,V:r mm '■ ■ .%■•■: L ' A it » 1 -4 - - ■ ■ ■!' ' .. • i' 1^ ■f. Hn , ■ . .■.■■ ■■■:■ ■' ^ '■j . *#W>“' V .•,,.a,,<gf^-‘-‘^. - Record Lot 40 - ^ommiBsion meeting on ant's behalf. ition submitted is &S j.*.wm3::**•'• .•./«<.4 :'i/it7/i) rosTwyy:ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO.wmrnVIII C«*M' l«k«Am C»t2) HI «»., . ;=i*ieSXSDLJ&Bl.ROBERT POSTMWIS ....... (WE INCH EOUALS 20 FEET IffBTlTiP* iioveaber 18, 1987 o,c-^r,. 7M7.11^ l^ast Bl.ngRimOMl n. 1«M Lot St and Lot 59, MORSE ISIAND PARK, Hennepin Coanty, Minnesota. ffi' !!^!^ •«. *. iiMtc>»t_u» wiirn B.». <..*.« •■• ■ T"l M3tq«MKl •« \rm pipt mmumst m Mn, ei#NN«t4«9 • fSi.19 fi,A*f Jl.} COWTOOR IITfgRVAL IS OITl fOPTi mi H. !»*• tM e»«« a-crih^ pr«S»>tv .«lcN ! !T.I nTtr^tlUl • »•«♦. ol th. Mi r.c.rei. tMt tM cl^t ^cur^, .1 IN. be«> to art*f«<«0 th. #*t«rt ina i»tur« of M* jjjj, apinian for lH*t c«m.t.nt c««.l ttOwtd H r.t..«od to porfor. • tUlO oWeN «f . t •Mf i»9 ^f^ pttp&r\n$ th« •MTvey, . • .-.* f..- • . EXSEMEKTSI ^ Wt t»mm mif thooo OMwnts tAieN th* c(l««t Morm ut of or i*»!ch v» hispwt to boeoM tho ourvoy <to*o "ot a> -rt to ti»«( oH OMOMntt ond i^o»o»nU. •Moro of throteh othor oourcoo. tTXMPXRP 8YMBQM MtP ,05j, (f .o* u futoo »«, th*n d«>oto» ^-X«t.* 1/2- ID ptp. -»th plootic ptte Po«-1ie «t.t. Uce»i IM***- ’«J5 ..t, »f 0 I. t .» fotnd iron Imd Surveyof^ unclor ttio LOMi of tho Stoto of PInnooolO* SftSUSl o* P®rk*r EeLeSe MOe 1093S * ''S?l fj- f T ■' ~ ^■t-3 ■.>■r%»" m iisili i: V-.- .-.-V 3 -.,.:. -;73 :,'f:\:: V';.: -S'-;> ■' ^ ■- • :i"• '■ ■ ; .v3;>:;V ;- " ;iv':-. rU : ■ V-i'xiy ' 3' 3::V ■' ..-3: 'wm.-.■aw, > k :*>K .•v;3.:.' ,--;.v V3 ;:y t" ■•■ I'-''.■.'■ .'•'' 3 ■ - :=/■ ■. ^ . V •:: • ; ■•• • ••• 3^3:: <3-:: .• ^•;:. ..-■ :. './ -kt: .. 3: 3 :^3;3':;: ;v;::.;^:3.: Y.; -3- .\3r/ 33::r-3 3 ;. . ••V.. i ■••• .3 ■ Blips V 1.v»*^ IHi■»t. ■ .■ >r, ■:- ■■■■ ■a*.* ?•■V4>-. ) 4 rr® :■ = As %■■■:.m? f'-t:tVcG:^ h^. ;, ;/ ‘5^ •*••'/ ";'•• « -V- •^nK^'s . ’v •■'*,'•• - ^ y-m ?•' -T my-M ‘•>- i* 7"" - . >-■' ''Afeiil'SvA'ip :-sj^..iv;.,Vv-;;; a; ; -.r ;•, •... •-. •'•r.; ■• - ' '^'V'' i 3AS:V ‘? :"i "’v<5l BB|fN:»iaaBw:Tpf: v :W *Wlip:a*R» ifiii’;,*tei .:«'.S'-, 'S*- ■mM '■'■■■: X^SiA'"A;.-V-A:,rAA:; \l ■ •' C... •.'•:•• • .... : ■ . .. . ^ . ,. . . • :*.; ... A' -.X-;- '■ ■■ r\:-y9(:.,h ■■■■ ^ :'•;■^ r :'.. / v-^-'"- 2lo^-15;ite ■■■ ■'•■' ' X^V-' ;■■• '■ ■'A/.f ;. .:■•• - » ix2i V-' A^.-S.: t ■m v: If7 .V. ,. < ■ }>'.,•*■■ .'■. > •••.■* :<r?. AV 'a a-a' 'T--:>■■ ■'" ''■.■* i rV®ii asr:§if^ y -:i}irr?-i'te---oaP^-v'>-i).rtO(Planning Cosffilaaioa Chainun Ealley Planning Coualsaloa Hanbera City lutei;iterator BernhardsonThoaaa J. Jacobs* Building OfCiciaX March 14* 1911 #1247 Pobart Posth >«tts* Big Island - Eecord Lot 40 Conditional Usa Pamit/Varianca Aptplication was tablad at tha last Planning CoMaission naating on 2>16-B8 batusa no ona af aarad on tha applicant's behalf. Tha application has not changed - nsv information aufasdtted is as followst 1. Proposed Site Plan 2. Qn-Site Septic Design \ - ■■■ W0I ®W; A ® i »'SVS04 33La/ -. ^ADVANCEc«ter l*iHrpM ;^®.: :®V- M HR"'-®-' y-ij^mk ■“life::, 1 fiyMfiX-J!ROBERT i:,/:i£.. ;■ : V “• ■ ^'';V ■ : '' W' -. p/," ^ SCALEt sangiyBi pymifti LEQAL D1 Lot 58 4 DXTOMl ((•v«ti«n> • ggMyy-M SKUeHA TO0 tf (ron ^ ®:v.CQMTOOR .® ■ 7-®'a: .,w7. ■':-®v, ® ;®®\- y 'i-^J^rg g y ' ■ ^ r^/' ■’■■■/v AiiS';./:: . .-'.‘A r7:€®Ats®^ LBQMs P yt htv« Bur rtcordt* y bttn umIb t le9«l dttcr OUT use in I EA8BMB2 y« thaw onl Iht turvty PTMKM *0** Otnotfl found Iron cbrtif: I htreby c Itnd Survey SamuRl .•:]= ■ ■. • \ ' ' • f 'V;. ■■*••..;:: V ■ :■ X -V'XX^ ■A . i ,•.. > . ,.- i’®7' - : . ;:.,:i.:VV;Ai-',-.. .. A-.';..'. .....A '-; : ■:-’jfeAV;AA;.r,: fy . ■ :• / • i %n 5 /■1 y-1 ,»./ "rA: .~<:j t y \ "Ii. s v>«^ r~i^ mi\_ 1^ *• 1 ■: >i ■' .. ;=.■>• i::-Y a .; a;^ ■a-^ ■-.: w?ym- , . 'f >awi^v' \\. ■. -i" '■^•v ?<’. ..: ••cawPr!v ■y:,;;:;:,:-;?.-'£/: 11^: :.- V • :V .;. S';P - J r. .:v5^ ii ; .r- ^;- p» ',V ,• ^ ^•KS*1 ■kl"• 9 »%'. !fe ­ lt: ■ ^ t i SaBfaiif' f « i iit » •!I IJ kt. J »W IV \ I • i* ,.^'. •■ ■;.' iPjj; n y'.ajaV:-. 1;*:. "I •• - ::-/^ 2 ■'jifcSjifxv''';^; mmrnmm■iHjk>>Yr ', Y:-.'.:-^Y¥Cr-^ :..; V jY’v'YYY-'. -...:r-. ' % -;i?£k\v.r#^: Mi^k,%i*:>■ V■■: ■ V ■ . ^ Y'Y-' feaMaavaa, ■•■•:■• ', ;V;a:r:v:r^av>^Y:a^ , ' /V. -V”-^. . ■ ;■• ■YYY.;'Y::>^vi',;.■ .^y -Y :;,YY YC- .-Y :';vH pswsaHirfa-4'-Ssa im':-:a. ';■ v; -;^ ..‘-ina.-;' ib ••P^w:mimm I r 1 it ii» -I fk IL » #1233 -J . ^ *L . f -il^ 7 ^ i3r<^. v-^ V .1^ M ' . r;* ••»>■ » ‘ 4 ^>r ■..,. .•S|;-., |a ^f> '■^»’ jHtik ■V-■ ■' :».- akk T "5^ . ’ / •, > K. 'W\2m . • -• ^nsz K, 'C^ T ^1 t"' . 15Hm iV/, ;r‘,.^ M V- ^ v:':a mm^-1^ ■< • u TiS'*" ... >■ .. «immmSBi- j ^ v?« •■ ‘T. W ^•>: dJ <>; .1.JT,.‘ , ^\l j K •• » '^T) Ji| mSt •J4 g VA.- **J0 f ‘* • A 4i^ ^ .'-- -^•'J >/ V?/ J*'^ ^IP Ss9»?s V 1^im I *‘*‘- ^ <1}T ■te';- ■ ( m w i^nM o o . f I ^ wf C iyncti, fl Leo M s ff Meiend. PI ** _°*f" rm p Anotnon. f i Sum^ W ttirtw A tatAfnann. Pfi Warti A Saip t toih. PI ft c tiiuaii. Al-A. nn t Angui PJ «fd A lanlofd. PE ncc Lund. Tb© tb a berm between /: ‘-ili -s: ^\;vC*-'-::;::;‘.=?^j^mmm1l=-.'--.LD DECEMBER 21, 1987/ Homes, Inc. wa« present ey have entered into a >urchase 2715 Pence Lane. I the existing structure property. He noted the with preserving the many a that in order to id not disturb the 0-75 the house 9' by bringing Eficult and the neighbors the neighbors could not e submitting letters in ative of building a house rjceting standpoint, they it a walkout. isly agreed with Bellows :ommission inenbers and Mr. luld most likely require a it for this matter. Mrs. rty as it exists has a ation of a walkout does i drainage and allowing a e issues. She felt within the 0-75' should inning Commission that if 2 sale of the property to from the public and the n. Ayes 6, Nays 0. le retaining walls by the e application by the owner 1 Halley Homes, Inc. wmm 1 .-c:vr •-. , tell mmm m:m Mmmm M Bonestroo Rosene Andernk & AssociatesisiEn#irieet ft ^rthUsctt mc ftI 1 € C• € t fti ftfm ef» W m ftie«ftf mc m« 9mm •« ^tft « 0 ft •n C I MS I ■M A 0%ftft c«Ms ft ym m9%09Aiftm n Biareti 17» 1^*95 City »f 0»( tox ♦♦ .«««» %Myt 55323 Atte: Mr. Tee JeeoSe Sat 15* - 1235 lallry 2715 Pense Sear Toet the tea* •«<» take MiaaetoiAs. The property owr.er thit’^thi^alet atructure contain Mt<...ti~ .ItkU <««' «' iameSlately after construction. ! ■ % m. If you have any queatioaa pleaae contact thit office. Toura very truly, SOWfSTPOO, SOSEHE, ASDERLTK k ASSOCIATES, liC. .*•• * . *rr ■ywm- : : . . ■ ■■!■■■•' ■■■ . vi .at!' 'V i|l||ippiik#s^T- \ :i :•: ■••■• ■ iTwm-» DECCMBBR 21, 1987 lamm » rwm ruuaijm astmissiom •1213 Hid^ iwuurr warn, i»c.:ed neighbor on the west rt of the proposal. public regarding thie I closed. pplication pending the 3 approval subject to an removed. reviewed the site and oncurredwith Kelley ley would be willing to f indeed do not use it. f’Wfc.WwIi.'V ^mm nu’ d «c .iilA 11* 19*7 18 to review it further, he patio size to provide be agreeable to reducing estetically. by Hanson, to recommend concurrent removal of :hin the 75-250' area. staff must receive the reas of hardcover to be r application before the nd Certificate of Mailing iditional use permit and jns within 75 feet of the walls and steps. hore bank to provide a itting with the proposed K'N-; r . i - •',■■■'' , •:y . k-;‘. I.M ■k-~ ■., ■> m ■„ ■ ,.■■■'■■-MS isliffl mmmm mmM y matt, niC. o«llew lomes, Inc. was presentMichael Bailey of Michel Bailey entered into afor this ®"^,^nik^s^to pu’i^chase 2715 Pence Lane,•qreement the e.isting structure They are interested io _t__♦he oroperty. He noted the and building a new ho^ ® filT Jith oreaerving the many two adjacent "*^9hbor^ wncera it^^ order to build trees on the lot. !*♦ JSiji and not diaturb the 0-75* the proposed '**the house »' by bringing area, they would J*‘^%,icult and the neighbors in fill, which would Vt the neighbors could not nt«d*1he ‘iiVtinrbut will be submitting letter, in support of thsir propose1# Mllo.. not.a . thlr. .It.rn.ti.. ot buUdin* . hou,. with a baaammnt and no walkout. Mr Hallay stated from a marketing etandpoint. they Sluld not build a house without a walkout. Planning Commi.eion unanimouely agraad with Ballow.' third optiona conditional uae permit, drainage problem Bellows explained ^he*drarnaqe*and allowing a not solve She felt thatrhi"p;:po»dT.trt oi%r.Sin, -ithin th. o-75- .hcuid not be allowed. Mr. Hall.y indlc.t.d to th. =?”‘:Vro"p«ty ”n walkout design waa denied, the eaie OS lii v him would not occur. Thor. w.r. no other comment, from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by at pr^posed^ based on recommend denial of the ^Navs 0.iLufficient hardship. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays It was noted that repair of by the owner owners would require J Salley JomeB,"lnc.as current applicant is Mlcnaei na r 8 p -x" . . . I tfiHiiri‘^‘^^0^^^11• • •:mttd^iim^wmmmm.ppi^-v:i ' , ..rf , , v> N/;3;lK;aiS-MEi:IH6 PILB «0. 1233IIRG COMNISSIOH ACnOM Date of Noticei 12/29/87 r. ft Mrs. W. Mernlk 715 Pencj Lane xcelsior, MN 5533X Use Permit or Against cceptable and/or sufficient re protected area. irmed as: ,g starts at 7:00 p.m. ig date and time. ficial Planning Commission Recorder after review and fe'S!rii’ 'i wmmm mxmrm or m ruomim emmssim§1230 JC tiln 11 iii- '^■■pm,f . '- i*-\',''-P' .■':. ^'‘',V' V**• ’. .. I;- •; *.’;■ :•*■• ’ . ■ ' •' '.: . :.V o:;.: v ' .•..•• :.■• .-.v• 'I , ..- .:-■>. .-1 ^HBBTimC ULO IS n* HOTSON co«TlllO»^^ noted that the meet affected neighbor oil the west has stthsiitted a letter in support of the projposalfhere were hO comments from the public regarding thim matter and the public hearing was closed. lei lows suggested tabling the application pending the revised survey. k Kalley stated he would recommend spprovsl subject to an agual amount of hardcover being removed. ■anson and Cohan stated they reviewed ^nXSed to applicant and concurredwith Kelley recommending approval. Kelley asked applicants 1« they it ramove more of the petie if they indeed do not use it Susan Johnson stated that she has to reviw further, Ihowever, she intends to reduce the patio aise to provlda for more garden area and «rould be agreeable to reducing th« patio »ot« if it works out ssststicallye It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Rsnson, to rec^end approval ss proposed subject to concurrent r*»oval of equal (or more) hardcover within the 75-250 area. Motion, Ayes ft, Kays 0. Mabusth advised applicants that revised survey indicating the areas of hardcover to^ removed prior to scheduling their application before Council. lie.#1233yWaiAlL BALLR BOMBS '^PBBCB LAMB _ _ITIOMAL OSB PBKMITAABlAIlQi POILIC BBABIHG *^publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. This application involves a conditional “S® permit and variance to allow land alterations within 75 feet of the shoreline. . „1. Replacement of retaining wal_s and steps. 2 Alteration of the lakeshore bank J more natural, consistent setting with the proposed walk-out design house. ■IITY of ORONOrywUl Bmy. MioimmU 55323 •Manicip^ Office Hnnetonka Lt/variance 473-7358 ■■f».. • V>.A ■m^>k-k- 55323 goHIfB VILS BO. 1233 MmcK Of fuuniivB cokhissigh action 473-7357 D«te of Botlcoi 12/25/t7 MlchMriiuar»«* Inc- C09JWS TOi Mr. » Mri. »». Mornifc*” si:^t!:iircro..in„ s.it. 3.0 uiiiHor !s"* ..sn11055 Viking Drivo teceXtlor. mm 55331 Edon Frairla, MM 55344 TfWU OF AFFLlCATIOBl XX Varianco/Cooditional Ut« Poroit OT nrUGl 12/21/t7 VOWl « For Against Pla&aiBg (^aadLssioei rmeemmmoam tli« following* XX Donisl i®*' raasons notad balow. areliminary review . Cook's latter of review . ■OflB tm SPICIAZ. COMDlTIOHSt .uffici.nt f will ask for the Dn: Applicant's next scheduled seating is confixtaed as* City Coiincil January 11, 19881 meeting starts at 7i00 p.s. Too will be notified by mail of the meeting date and time. either side of the sual impact on the If vnu desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission .lnotV.r?hty .r. .v'.liibl. t^ro. th. City ..cord.r aft.r r.vl.. .nd approval by the Planning Commission. 11 replacement. ght in for rew house ,th the drainage that ikeshore yard - questions regarding his infoirmation must .988 in order to be : March 21st. I •• : m busth, oning Administrator Pt'BLICWORKS - 473 7359 .mm > .........................................................■ mmz mThomas W Pwe»soh. PI Charies A frictianr. Ef MMhaei C lynch. PC Leo M Pawdttf y(B. PC James f Matand. PI Hariar* M CXtdh», PE BanneEh P Andwson, Pt lutan M BmtmPfKe«h A iathmano. P£ Mark I BolfV PC Mark A SMpi&nn. Pf Robert C fcistek. A1 A.le. PE Thomas E A h 9ui ^ Pf1. Pi Howard A. Sanford. PE B 261988 Lttal on the property at 2715 floor elevation six feet. »nt without excavating in t >oring homea. Raising of int visual impact on the drainage being directed back line to drain the area •om the site will not be vail replacement and the fice. 12-636-4600 mmmm ill ■ ■/: :.■ ¥—a; ’'i’^i CITYofORONOiondno;• Cnmank 1^.On ih€ North Shor* <4 Uk» MMO^brnkm rebruary 2f# 19iR IHichMl Bailey Michael Bailey 8o»aa# InO. 1 Southweat Croaalng 11095 Viking Drive* Suite 3i0 Eden Prairie, MM 553*4 a., applic.tlon »HJ3 - conaltlon.1 0« Mr.1t/V.rUne. 2715 Pence Lane, Orono Dear Mr. Halley» 4 fh- ritv Enaineer'a preliainary reviewI have received the Cook's letter of 2V. n*.rE^*n .‘n"c!«:i ‘ Ur Vour Mvl^. «ouiur.-itiursi4Vtt‘.r. i„7‘uVorUJi'^nr‘“ JiopVrtr u”"ora«‘« dVtrrrin.'“''t"V vuV.? Up*.‘cV on' III existing residences. 21 provid. pUn. for th. r.t.lning w.ll r.pUc.m«nt. 3) eu.ntlty of fill -.t.rUl brought in for neu hou.. location. .1 n.t.ll ho» you plan to deal with ttl. drainage that drains towards th. house within th. lah.shore yar Pleas, contact .y office 1*J°“ ""Jhu'ufo^MuI^MStthe information and items discussed ab ^ Th ^‘ci^“dr r?h:%l7nnl'n^‘?cmrss"iSrrge*n ‘da' of March 21st. Sincerely, (a - /)1^ JeWmJeMme A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator jAM/tln assessing • ■tSi !i^v- V.-r. r 'll-.... ;’ -jJ:' ■.••. _;.2y i^swK' ; . *■‘m^JiL,--im.Mf„r.V^ Q Q rono Permit/Varianc« following itemss of the adjacent ne. g the existing nlng wall. lining wall detail. n existing retaining ion of the stairs, s plan. ixcavation contraC- ete floor slabs pprox. 350 cu.yds. rotection and front n site plan - approx. 130 cu.yds. ed new residence will u. yds. which will be a. wing lakeshore yard tall. ••■XT V . •■■vV-' s:'.# ^ A'.\. -i / . .7Wv;.^,71^'7:7:>r,v^ . ■ •■•‘^.•' ■. .i . 7v ■ '-'■■■' '7j "' ' ' ' ■7»1: "7 7;^ I'i-Ji,' f ■ fia smm 777i ■r^mmugIS*vwm Wl mm V V7^'v v-Vv •■ •'MJMm wmiMKsm 7 v777.:: W0i 'S. I I& :.^:' •• ; . .• ■ -..>• -i- .-7 .'■ V ■ V ■■./ |7’‘ .■•.■■ ■■ . .v.vy., € rm-ifm: 7^: :; -777'7 77:;!:v;..-:7: 7..7;7'4-7' :.!.v_-''v-;■.•'•• '■ V-XIvM 7.! -v: ;,:^-r-:y . :■|j|j|B[jjjS)it^ r#T¥XX^ rnrir* ■iti4^iL#i!j Im«T3T«*T»I u^ lilf-Itl .A y:-- - p7;7<"7:::-:7 mmmm ■-V - .-^r ■. • ■•• •. ,■. ..-. •;••■ .■ -. •) . . • . ••• ■ —•-. • •*. . ■■•'■ •■■ 7;-' •■■ ■■■•-.:• :=•■ • -!-:'\ ■ :.. •■^ :.-7 •■'•••,- :• ■mm," 7- 7:;7'^'■•7'.:;, - .V ,,y-l-: ■■■■■ '\7V '■'• ^ ’•■•■ " ..■ ;*• '*■' ■ ”**j’ii*-*i*■ : . • • ••ii:.7''.;' •. .• ^ :*3lii' •. I -7''.:. , ••:■ t .•- 7 .. ■ V:r::7^^V;'v:,7::v777.;-,:; ;••• : •: ; V • t- ^= -\=i-..;-'-v/-.v::7-^ .77-7:--7:7*m;777, fm ■ii .......•• =\ -' > ^t<AW •:.l •■&m mm ..■. 4 a ^■f' ?.r-m-' V.' •.'•rt ‘m. ...... t- Wn '!^/:":^v-K-.. : €msim $ " SfMm fti:*a ^L“wc;as#a»?m ■:.^:.;,,.i?.V;u-v- •Stal• "•* ^, ^A» ' •B8|Biiiii ifc.yim•7. 1988 eaniM A. I ling 1 ZotM Office Bo: :al Bay* M: Appllcatii 2715 Penc<•iTOTra Ms. Mabus ra suiMitt 1> Appro on ai [•C^KvJ 2) a. Co St b. Ca Ns va wh 3) Impoi tor. a) b>aVal^aVM^ P-lalalstaV^li! 4) Sketi drai: aei As. .ila sldent /bb ilosures ,e; 4-10-1 "•.I' ; 1 >.. • •• *•* ■ •• i ■ “. :a ,v ■!. !, ■: i ■ t^A ^ , v; 1;A-W-' ' '■ = a V V. m A - :liprs.-A:AiA--:,:A AAV..:.:A^ fe-l« -'?. ■ii • / A:\;A a mm-: feAA';^::,J ^Bil •A'-*”' '■‘■mm m?SI aR: ■Baa .-:AAi^ A " ■■'A vA’'i.^A iv."' .■:--ar,-i;.AVA A -- A. .-A. : i;r-.V":aA mr^ ;'>?-Bat ‘i Jj-fflllf' ^A'^A ^A:: MXMw-m^rnm A-A,-.;Aii.A:AsA^!:.:a ;a A-V!.a AA;A:A::A:>*?:VA';A^ .rA^A ■ \ -: AA| ■7:41^^A--A ]. . - * :w' ' ;• •;: ‘. *- ■ i • :..a W:A A-Y;-'■M^g Mm ill f;rv::»|:Av:A • • ’•■.: ■ .:f: * •: A-^:^Vv' >/::;;Af A • •••A Imwsmi'^ ■ ' v' :Sgli^^lllllM (lication involves the Iding of the existing 1 been reviewed as a new consider only proposed Lning walls within the in a deteriorated state im of July 23» 1987. sjor alteration of the Latent setting with the ards within the 75-250' itback area), as opposed rth, east and west sides s of additional fill on ■ill is in excess of 100 rost footings/foundation, onal use permit is not it applications involving n the 0-75' setback area. 75' setback line and were n within the 30'+ between hibit E). The applicant desired lake front yard id graduating the cuts for >ntal advantage regarding on and recommends against ted out of the 75' setback block retaining wall along tion and removal of 1,070 thetic or environmental i6 City in its consideration m > ••• V; ~ Hmm4.75toning File 11233 December 14, 1987 Page 3 of 33. HOWstructure on the *, *affect in your consideration?,h.t condition, -cold you .pprov. .It.r.tlon. -Ithln th. 0- SQ^b^ck •r«A?EnviroruMntal benefits. Co.pr.U.n.1.. l.pro,.«nt cl d«l««. - uot only .« « pro^rty but also surrounding properties. Severe erosion. Ease of maintenance reducing hasard to homeowner. Ability to eliminate structural hardcover. others_____^______________—* Staff Secnawenils tloa - TO reco«.nd a con<Uti^al Subdivision 19 and Section ^ and reconstruction of ®^*P* ro‘:i"crdV.^^^:i“»nr^/:nd^^^^ on tn. lollowln, llndln,.. 1. no .ppr.clable .nvlronnent.l b.n.,lt to quality of tun-off. 2. unit, dl.turb.nc. within l.h..hor. protect.d .raa. 3. so .cccptabl. hatd.hlp f ron‘’“ho«lVne^«d is adequate depth to move h -^--ider either moving the house back suggest to the applicant that j*® . ^idth in front of proposed house or use the 30**^ feet of t-he City may consider granting a to provide walk-out and that .\\\ "^brt>ugS^t to site to artifically conditional use *\an (proposed^contours plus raise grades. A be submitted prior to formal location of fill, if applicant wishes to reconsideraction by the Planning Commission it app+xwa and request tabling. Administrator ice Lane - >lic Hearing 1-75*. , - ordinance 24, Second ,d if fill brought to site not required for adequate Applicant must clarify* •* involves bringing in 2*40° addition, conditional use place new structures and ea. ‘pj* • Standard ■ 148 s.f. hore Yard “ 384 s.f. of the continuous wall rd) ■i ■■■-4 ^ Vi®r ^ ■loning File 11233 December 18, 1987 Page 2 of 3tdst of bhibiteExhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat lUp Exhibit D - SurveyExhibit F ” Site Plan/Gradinq Plan Exhibit P - Floor Plans/Bl^ rtions Exhibit G - Engineer's Report 5r.VtTcVrr.vi« exhibit B) r'cc^ia.'ron'^T’ prcpo."n "rlbtbfy .cr.en'ea by tb. .tor, c, July 21. 1«2. Th. .ppllc.nt V"** "* “J*Jril/Sonr*.t.nt^sVtuVq°-ith the lakeshore bank to provide a more . yards within the 75-250' proposed ”vard8**wi*thin the 0-75' setback area), as opposed to other proposed option %rds of additional fill onof house requiring approximately 2,400 cudic ya -xcess of 100 site. B..«l on S.cti^ i“-“Va.™“t.’c‘o«r.V.' o, troU ^^otin," foundetlon. ipp''lVc.*;t c.n“ .u“or°t thi.%1.1,. . condition.1 u.. p.r.it is not needed. Th. eppllcetion 1. proposed walk-outs or ®t the 75' setback line and were These residences were located tv-out desian within the 30'+ betweenru,r.irthi r,-; ^aj.«nt%^^*ho^«**.i'’th''i cXiMtion of flllin, .nd ,r.du.tln, th. cut. for ^lalk —out up to +.he 75' setback line. , tn hte roview sees no environmental advantage regardingThe Engineer in his *f . alteration and recommends againstwater Quality from the proposed lakeshore alteration Sl major .iLr.tlon within th. 0-75 • ..tb.ck arc. I88U0S for consid6rat:ion: 1. DO., the fact that th. house i. located out of the 75' aetback area have any bearing on this review? 2 DO., th. elimination of the continuou. block retainlno wall alon, ?b. ^irrsbor.li.e ourw.i,b t^^^ cubic yards of fill/ is considerationconsideration? Which is appropri'-te for the City in i of this application? m. %0^1 k; il \ a.. : f- . .'i-' - • • .■Sj? tees::: •: .. • •••. . ; 7.-V' •e.; 'e : #evee ■s W ■ • .k: ^iBI & 1mm TII16 (00 P.M.Watertown Road - tion to Vacate Portions of Revised (Southeast Shoreline nee Lane - Amended Application :a Boulevard sview Road oint Road xth Avenue North >8 - Public Hearing nission - County Road 51 S 19 jrmit & Variances - lia Street Amend Original PRD ry 16, 1988 Minutes, presentative to attend the Planning Cos»ission Chairman Kelleyorono PlanningCity Administrator BernhardsonJeanne A. Kabusth, Building » Boning Administrator t)ec«itber li, 1907 Bomimf District - LR-IB - .94 acres or 41,148 s.f. fertlneat Ordin**®** s»d Issues - v re section 10.22, ctuV.‘."“pP^ repl.ee section 10.03. lt°ttl“ wrought’^ .It. Series - Conditional use per it q required for "r.:iu"on;oit :;;llc2nt ••“f.e^r.de' li Addition, condition.! «.. =p.“^\'t ^rV^!r:d' t'o“ri.t*:r;V.t*.l’nln, e.ll.. ^ 2 • Variance to plac© new atructures and ^r%‘o™ l^l'iltirXn*. withl'n protect.d .r... airdeoeec P.et. 0-75* Area • 13,425 s.t. m 1C1-2S0* Area - 27,723 s.f. in area Allowed Hardcover - f°*^or 24.3% (please note this does Propo..d H.rdcov.r ‘"’’/"r'a"'tM. "ly lnc?ud« include the driveway)* * House ■■ 2#600 8«f« Drive • 3pl95 s*f* Lakeside Deck - 4iv standard - 148 s.f. steps - La)ce8hore ^SAoJe Yard - 384 s.f. Retaining Walls Only ^ion of the continuous wall(This includes the elimination o at upper level of la)ce8hore yard) V S' ^ i.V:''' ^ .-V .'y-; ■ •••^^ :\v^;:^V: \" .. V.: V v !:■ ' ' ■'iv-"v.;y v /v - -yy v% ^S^;y;^ :y ^ - r ; .-.i • .• \ : v •• ■;■• y y.: ' v'-':-' y -• ■/■.-•.'y S-y • V'.:; i .y y.-y ■ yy;-"; y-= ^ ^r ;• ; ■ • ••..*•: V- y . : y . 'y'yyyyyyw- ■ yyvyv*-:-'-• r . ••: ... :5«|p «3SS fO UJ QC B ^ _ *!'5s5‘^2s^r.is >4 3 51^ *5233u>i O S 3 N Ui w 3 33 te-n ■S-' ; : ''.^i «»a ^5 ' '.’• W' ■ ' !.;> **r.-u.mmmm^ »te?»;: •i ‘ .i M iL --■ w^v: ii^s‘ ■ "4. ■ ■'j.: Ms®*; ■5:.).y. .■• •. ^ . .. :•;4 a --AW;.- ■;;... :V:>;-:-- ---!;vv. ; -:V3. ; ■ ■•.I’-:-'/; :-,.^ :;., . • : r:- :gy|^ .-.M ■kM: ' .; >vSjy-iWliSli •' l«-.:.-V;'fisfc •i- ;/ V, ..'V ' *. . ••..• ..•:•■ .• ^ ■•••. ;,T ■ «■,:"«;•:, '.:. :4-'a,'; v:.=i'-••••■;;.' •;; -4 ^:v ;V-i-S-4=-PLMmiva CtSKMISSTOHIKOIBMT, HMKai 21, uti__7*«01275 —*««■ iOM* KKmi - OODBCU. CBNO^awcit iSwasBffmTivE -It » *>I?557"Stb.rln. ». Cr». 17*# W.l.rtow. Bo., Preliminary Subdlvi»i<» 7»45 P.M. (S<mtii««»t Shoreline of forest Lete) •.' r. >: -•f- Xppllctlon - Second Review • U4> J»n« * 0l«» Sl»'‘9>'‘«7- ”‘5 «*.Ti«. »ogl..»ta Conditional Un* Parait - Saeond Faviaa >'■ Se #1248 Thcaaas Willieme# *127 Oek Street Variences ~ Public Hearing • 1249 Daniel VI. ^*^°^*“* 27IO^Shaydwood Road 7. 11250 Dana M. Wells, 1397 Orono Lane Variance - Public Hearing V' ». ilJSa ». John Lindahl Jr., U0» Bohns Point Bond VsriAnc© Public Hc^rin^ W^:' ■ i <• “”• ss'.i„‘;!'s;-L::;:’:-.;:t:.u:" s:: sn;.. Public Hearing ■T;- 11 #1258 John ft Kathy Ehlert, 1785 Concordia Street Variance *■ Public Hearing SKISTCH PLMi „ .12. #1252 Chris Haugen, Navarro Plat nr<n4nai prdPRD - Conditional Use Permit to Amend Original PRD *??*”??JJ:nJ™o».i..ion approval ol Pebru.r, 16. 196. Minntea. 14. Planning Coomisalon to aelect a representative to attend the April lip 1988 Council Meeting. adjook 'll:. ■ ' 'kll ’: . A-•■.•.• . ■ .^.'i •.'•■ ■. 7 ;• !••■ ■{,•/;.I-4■■^^i{'. |3V'm ■ r.3;4i,Vu Idft;- *5-./••->*' *:■ ^ V;. 'I '?^.!yaiite:viv>jyy h V ••••« r'f f I vt V.^.Jm '■■■ '■ ■ y/-y ■ '.■.V:^ .-. :3% ■ws ■ y ::t'4 • i? •-!-■•r.mm».:■■= 3: : :y..; •. 4.'- :■ e- ' '■ y..r I/: -: ■ W^i\ a ::; ;■^:A^ y V. ■..•:.•■ y ■■■■ 4 a'‘ ■ ''^:’P- ■'.A.:.; • ry.A-i- /.a: .:'A''fi..:r - ..V A' A:Ate;V-y-A .: :A, 'i^^AAVVV: ■<■■■ : ,':-m ' ■ ■. .'A..: • -s^i'. ■ ji'A •*.; "'j. •V 4 li- . •ono, Hennepin County, ice ofed to the attached list ito set my hand and seal ■ :'•■= '-i•:♦ -.rT-r.^T ■ ■-■ ■.. •■ ! :i- ■'• • •• •;•■•:■ •. :‘» ■■• : ■ -■ :■ •• ;. V ; ;• :-;'i ;ctl ■ I. < ■■■■ ■ ' r . ii •..;;;.. - .■■ V‘'^v-.Vv.: • r ■ ■ ■: :■■ ’;y .' •V ivy «iwi ' 1'v'mwmt\.I'-'*iv • ■.' •.•• ■■ .1 .• . ■•• ■•..• V *: ■■ • ••■ ■• •• -y c-Vvv/ ■ ^r- r.. ...:^i:.y--. MllMPI wMm^; ;V V: V^V^- •:v> .•.-•:..^v-.::v:A;vrro'^^: •, 4.-0 ." . '.«■: ';'•!•■••'- cmiiicAtu or kmliwc ^SfATl CF WlHHBddtA cooirr’Y OF bibukfis CITY OF )>) ••.II , ,..i. *o.... Ol th. Cit, o' °---„,"V»''bU=" Hi««.’oi., do MM3; *••*““•- "> ““ ““concerning th« »arr«r of property owners X. M»... -- •>«— this 3rd dsy of Msrch, IJSi. 9 Bot>M w* pi ■ ; i?.' :■■■., ■ ■m ■-■. • ■■';■ ■• -^ : ;'n-feiilWe':'■m ;i,=:;r r.,-.--v>;. ,:• ■>; Msn mn f(-%-HP>.n^:‘ n • ..•i- ' ■ ■. 4k:i1 mm« .•■:vi5:;-:' ri •;• >n-;n--:•"■.■!• ■■ -n- v-•.: \;:. nv n;iiv;;-:::;n:nn :•• ;-n3fefcp-vs ' .' *> * ^ 1b' •' --S^inn'nvm;:- vr;*:.,r .Mnnnn '■■•;. .V'-r': ■^ ■ ■■ • ; '^' ■ ':i-.'- -';\--'j?: ••.■-■;•;..•••>•;:* r* •■■. 'T..?:- ,; ./,: • • ■ : ■::.%• •'■ ■■.:••'•■’■■■■• ■■■'.• •■. ■•; ■*••■ ■.■• ' ■■ *, >> ■ , ■ ■• .: : :V '. ? •.;■ ■ •!■..■■ , ■ .;: : ■:■ ; -.\ ■■: - ... ^;: .nxv^xnvX:. .. X ' ' - .- V ■ :-ivX^fi4;: X- :-■ , :>W. -X:. Kj ■•; .-l-'-'n ■ ;>■, ;v':■•-; X.XV y; ■ i X<‘ .i; .X v : V .-■• ■■■■■ ■ :• ' • ■ 'JLdential peclf y) DPff —rptalninr wallfi* within 350* (you can ,£ Finance A-603 Govern»«nt| addressed to each of the nawe Be Application is complete. Date information required or to pay all fees and/or cation, and certifies that to the best of his/her B application and V City staff, consultants, embers for purposes of offices 25 days before the , Meetings are h®l^.present at all ^o\^edulej^ and Council, and, i meeting, to Pi®*®®«dvis| n your place and to advise r to the meeting. R» STy-y- pift' ■ ^'■^ ■ 'v ••-•■ mm r;;,v,-;v: •'AV.-- :• ;.:y 1 i'-'^ ijS . * Wrnm yym-yy fi** ■■■ : : •>'.> •■ • ■C ;'v *■■. K imm yv:• -y >.:• .• V-; ;;:= .•-^ - ■• ■■.•. • ■•■ ••■ ■••v' . •■•"'. ■; m'y- ■■. ' .yi£ .j>> y?«w:ymm, ■ ■.■;•; s.e.iyv:- >f\c: -wmmm 54PiU>.,;*..'. i-;: HK-.W-^- ■■-UV :•;•-■■Li-::.:-':v. rv ■•:wmte'fe1". . : •;••.-..*•• .( ■..,! ' 0:-'- im-'i h M mmm rii® mm: mmm mm mm viii?.'-*:' lira i^tes ■ ii r'"", ..'•*■ ••jH' ■ W-mrmz iKIii ..-. ••...^ . ’■■' 'U-i J Hv '.■’^ = ■ ■• ■ ■ .'•..•• JslW=';.-‘:.H {' •<I't*ii*f OSS OF FsortSiW Present loTiin^ DistTict „^ ., «# v^r^rtv Single Faffllly ReBld«ntialPrtsent Use of Pr<^rty ------------------(,pecify)_in^MhTrJSS^t* det.il. jfjr.ninf etuiin .f>'..."L.i’!'.:..;fe^‘^ *• Govorn«en Cernter 34S“327l) , , St..p.d, 1.^1 .l..d ene.Uj.. '»»' “ ““■ '* ’ lu the »bo». lUt with IU> t.tutn .Mr«». 4. Certificate of eurvey. 5. ca*^ Struct ion plan, if applicable Please6. Plat Map. _____________________________________________ remember that your not been Included Certification by toning Department that toning Officials Signature -- - - Und uirapplication is complete. Date __________—. J?^*.‘^ic.*nt “j:l^b, .,t... to provld. .11 \lV,^Vni/lr «^u.rt.d by th. lonln, "'“,“hV./S«rbr“bfo%‘.^t"ro*n ^"u'p"p'ritd*"l.'*«r. °.'nf cerfret to tb. b..t o, bt./b.t knowledge. Applicant’s signature Date Onvbr S SICHATORB fo this application and further Ttv^ner hereby ecknowledge. ?2 ??^Detty by City .taff, coneult.nte. luthorired re.ecn.ble ? Si.bei. tor purpo.e. o. •i„’v%".\V,.UorinV Vi"rltt!” ot thi^e «,ue.t.■l^v'«ti’,.tlon and v.rltlcaUon of this «,ue«. ^ .,y A //■ / ///,», ••— . / ■ ■> -n D«te '/' Z—Owner*, eignature X-n ' '___l-Cv-^rrt^------------------------ _____________________________ ... office. 25 day. beforeWTiBT m ■#< i *- ' before the third Hond_.y of e.ch oonth .Pflica^^^^^^^^^ and. it -«!"f Honday ot e..n %^rrcunci 1, and, ";irc.n^"U"ll.b\e‘« attend tfirBund^ing V Zo"nTng" Office of this char.g: prior to the meeting. '■.;^. ■ .■. - -V ••••:•... .;!.•; ;...vrv ■:■:}:..:A ■WB-' ft;i-e»t . '"ewflpw-'Wi-'" ■':■' f-'- . '=!^r s’ 1,iykwm:^ .aft U >w.r- ::■:■%ie permit/variance to of the lakeshore based walle are in an unsafe mit approval is not a ity, and welfare» or les or improvements in iments of granting a to Section 10.09r Subd. of granting a variance . 2. conditions t Jed. Dtained from the City. e permit/variance to ;• of the lake based on he only area which has a :o be protected. srmit approval is not a Eety» and welfare# or ties or improvements in ements of granting a to Section 10.09# Subd. ditions! pipe size. n outlet of pipe to trol is provided and 1 erosion control has - ^' S''- ■ n -V -o:- ;:V -r- : WHm f^sfipys.;#wi| ;• -'vi- 4vS= ’ : .rm \ i> : VL ‘ ' E:»*33.,« ■ Mm mm-' ISM ■'.•.s ■'••• V. f.;;... Pi»®:Wr:-: ■ Wmm V- . ': '- Mm •■'.S,.: r ■:■'■■■ v;:;- =f.;v^ ^E:.'j^;'.3:'iiw«saiJissiSS;" '=Mi- 'r'-i;;; : 'v;':f vi%. I-*- i -r«i ...♦jM 14as4»<Ptonm UtCATlOBSite Address ^7is P Property Identifies' Please check one - (for Conditional Os< Please attach legs required survey. appucamt Hame yirhiurl w*i1 j Address } ipg iMi#<ng Cif different thai ■WUU #U3dress 971?^ Pence Date Property Acqu I (do)((do not) al «a «PM « - COliDITICWAL OSB $100.00 a $150.00 b _ _ $150.00 _ _ $250.00 V $200.00 c d f $150.00 Va: PRD/PID - applications $150.00 $250.00 ' $150.00 --------- $ 50.00 ---------$250.00 •” $200.00 " Other - S' I ymuMfS‘ 3. tymMM tm-mmimm ' i» M , •;■ ;■•.!•• mm mm ». • - •'•i'- .•;: .■ M .\iK:"’''-vW ■■>'.' i'll,'®'. V* .M-.-. . ■ .3; :.. ■ : =:, - ■y-: k<T‘^, ace new structures ‘Cted area. linance 24r Second if fill brought to 11 is not required oundation. Subd. 19 and 21(2)» use permit for fill i submitted plans Into the guidelines lajor change from the •ration within 75’ of >VC pipe within 75* ). Applicant is Irainage water from area is the lowest k (see Exhibit 0). ilkout style house# [bit E). The City the time of this u at the Planning 75' of lakeshore. aining wall within jst be replaced as Lon was worsened by tncrete block wall {hibit L). This e lower wall is approxiirtately • 1 new stairway is Malls. Staff has xisting retaining ■ ■ 4 ■ \ * « -- \^ ... i ... i .• • • v.t- ■HIZoning Pile #1233 March 1#,19§8 Page 3a Anoroval of the conditional use permit/variance to «.to« th. r.t.inln, ».U -ithin TS- of th* Uk..hor. b..edlon the following findings: 1, That the existing retaining walls are in an unsafe conditon. 2. That the conditional use permit ^* detriment to the health# safety, and welfare, or siaterially injurious to properties or improvements i the vicinity. Thet it meets all requirements of ^rmntinq^ conditional use permit pursuant to Section 10.09, Subd, 6. 4. That it meets requirements of granting a variance pursuant to Section 10.08, Subd. 2. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1, Soil erosion cor'.rol is provided. 2. Separate building permit is obtained from the City. R ADt>roval of the conditional use permit/var lance to J;.ta^^^a Vto?m drain pipe within 75' of the lake based on the following findings: 1. Lakeshore setback area is the only area which has a lower elevation than the area to be protected. 2. That the conditional use permit *PPfo''* J ® detriment to the health, safety, and welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ■» *rhi»*. it meets all requirements of granting a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 10.09, Subd. 6. Approval based on the following conditions: 1. City Engineer approval of the pipe size. 2. Rip rap is provided from outlet of pipe to shoreline. 3. Temporary soil erosion control is provided and maintained until permanent soil erosion control h taken effect. ;;£v^=-w^ , ■' '.-y. '..fcv ■ '; V ■vm V.smmmm spa' UM •:>::v.-^,-;..-v-.,.1 iiiiB 2715 Pence Lane Second Review Lon 12-21-8? L-87 nstruction plan ig Coininisslon on 12-21- resubmitted. dwelling unit on the structure. During construct an existing i. Lleant is requesting the alteration - retaining 75* of lake - retaining age pipe within 75' of alterations within rmanent structures, staining walls within m ■i ; mmA>A%®;;;^AyAKA, \\ mmm I- w, . a«al 9^ I - H i?- A^ i-K- . :■ i: c. -.o- lK?ga ■3 :mm im:- ■■'■-A !''u-'V ■,:•;■‘‘-.(.r tv . (:: v' M •■ :■■ \ ■•• V.A-'-'W- fvH»; ;■::•■ >••.■" ■; .A- -;■ V- ^yjg|||j||^^H||||a). ^:V;..^;• :V -..f •'.■ . • • '. : •<•••. ■- !. •.;.if--;. .cAK .*'^-Vm'••a ;>Zoning File 11233 March 16» 1988 Page 2^^^l^°r"fort*^Vnd® auW^t^^ PTO^ected area, section 10.01. Subd. 1» Seri.. - i« tM. fill !• “ooUr.d%*.t. ~v«:^rof^ro.t footin,./founa.tion. rill nrouoht onto Sit. r S.ctlon 10.01, Eubd. 10 .nd 21(1). “ nJV rlWro d*oSS‘no\*"..ll into tb. ouideun.. for unusual land alteration. t fc O) is a eajor change from theThe revised plan (Exhibit proposed plan first received. 0 „ Odbr^if/variance - Land alteration within 75* ofronditional Use Permit/Varian^ ^ ^ lakeshore. 4no«-*ll a 6* PVC pipe within 75'Applicant is requesting to install 6 A^licant is of the lakeshore setback (Exhibi.^M^^^^^^ requesting this ‘^5®^*'®?® ^ ^945 5 This area is the lowest an area with an elavaU°n setback (see Exhibit 0). on the property maintain a walkout style house, -•.ATod-Tn re*p«tr ’Cur:iri ‘b%"^ub;itt.d t» you .t th. p..nnin, Cononission sieeting. _ u*11o within 75' of lakeshore. conditional Use Permit :: Retaining mails -ithm irr;,-.tin, to r.ator. hi. rbtaini^, ^Fir^ld «d'’'dke?iTat'erar/t\e va. worsened by the July 23, 1987 storm (Exhibit L). The arplicant is Ptf^*^"\^?/i*"^nne*'*(EX'bit Lk'"’' ThU and replace xt with . •hlah The lower wall is retaining wall is wall is approxiuiately 95'. approximately 65', and the “PP ^^<3 a„d new stairway is The existing stairs will ® „alls. Staff has ?irp°erttd^thV'^srt\"V;a°f^i^d l^^rthe^xisting retaining walls are in an unsafe condition. Staff Recom mendation^ Staff recommends the following *:=.•■*:.• • <2 ■ :• • ■■* .-0SS7- - ..,,• ■ I-;.’'* -•■i. y. ■ . A^--\ / ^A.:: ^A : ■•■ ■ -A.- ■■ -f;! '. ..^.•-. • :.-.ie'V ^ •' t- ‘ .••'aa V v is^: : .• ;• .AA'-' u.-A ■. :■ •,r;v .-ma*iP A*-: •:f'A^AA-mm Wm"a : . .aa :A.-v%a -^C-: • .. •;A- -V ^ : "; A ,: W; '^ v :v : ;a ;a A,a A k; K I , ■ *. • • *? •• • •■♦.• ;®t:AAA'vA A: -■ A v -*-:A' AA iSkf ■'••’A--^, ;i V...- '■; ” A =i At-.- -Av .-.A-r ^=;>. -v-v..^>iv:-v=B|f J.; ;^Iliiiimmm ;awi^ |a«»'ri •**«a %'■■" ' '' ■<wi fv; ,m ifii^ t-'mm ‘fa :r^\aa 'aa!a;:v "a /Jf a.l« .■mmm fefaaa.K4:al^ ■L:-.-;’ i'-.:' .;-'; i .. nfl mmiB ■:-V' ^..V* I. ad t ;-af. . .. =•= : A ••.V‘..-tf .ili^ : ‘V-;:a:'a‘va';a.a^ v:'.|iiiiE< ■>■ ’>'t-v.TO*Planning Co«»is»i€»» Planning Cowpiasion City AdministratorVTOKS DhTEl SUBJt Thomas J> Jacobs# March 16# 1988 ♦ 1233 Michael Halle; Conditional Use Pen l^st of Bzhlblta ~ A - Application B - Property Owners list C D - Plat Map - Notice of Public Hea B - Staff memo 12-16-87 - Applicant's letter - City Engineer Report - Staff letter 2-26-8 - Notice of Planning C „ - Planning Commission K - Proposed Site Plan L - Retaining Wall - co] M - Drainage Pipe Plan N - Elevation - exterio: O - Revised Site Plan F G H I J reliToM*] Applican' nas appeared befo: 87. This application has bei Description of Bequest - Applicant will be removine property and replacing i construction applicant wou retaining wall within 75' of To construct the retaining v following: 1. Conditional use pe walls within 75' of la. 2. Variance - Land alt' wall/drainage pipe. 3. Conditional Use P lake. Pertinent Ordinances and Is: Section 10.22# Subd lakeshore protected Applicant must replace the 0-75'. mmiih;'-',. mi mm vm . . . .•■• •:• •■ .•■• ■■■■ .- mm:-'r-m:«S;Mwm:.:4i .m ■ •S4a4s#SfJ» ' v;.*;- ■• ; BSteSif'-: ?? "^is' ... ‘ tSiiaillKl mi - ■ ■ .V*. . ■• ■■ ■.?:- :.■ > -'".r >• ‘ •!'!•.■ -.r '■ '■}- ::a ’-v-.m-:A •:■ < ■■ ■ ••••, A* ' •:•:■• ■?• ••••• v=' v <•••••• ■|fi4'.:.4i.'..;... hi-.: := •‘X.= mm mmmmwmmrM&-M w: sapiiasi.'' ^*0009ii'.^Ratl2 770»S1«^P 0 W0%*W1 . «T>*UI.IIN M10143*?. '• ■ • S . tar.'i* -s i. i. -i-.a:'jj ii , ^ ;a*.cu'a'.--r* '^ay 2 S'^t .-er.-'ir^ ';t,*'.gr a . tar na^-•. -.«!. ::f nr-i . -'• -'•=©•■• k!--.ou', caoerant snd !ve 7.-'d -3 • t, -* ^ ^ ^ *k € mm ^ ~.fr *.o ar.g.-.---.ca •> w.n ra reduca T-e •'•ar-ca l. i.va‘. j'J- a •. J&-* -a -■ '^■/r:m'>- '::■•■ V.! • -. '■.fXfr, ■mmam ? • • .• •: ?.*. . ":m WIM=lfeSI :i'- p-p;-Av ■!i. •- .•••V--- -- •••- ■ • • ■ •• ::.'••• •• ,v; .-■■>v"' -^.V, 1t 'v-.: -.a; aa'-^'v . -VaA--- .•;A=i*'.^.X:A: a: A ;;••••• •■-. ;:■ ■-I : ■;. -'V ■■; ■ •■■ '•■ ■■*■■i z -^:t ■:■;■{■'•^1 . . !!•: ■■.■ ■ *r * 7* ■ IT.. ■^.'US;,:?'■' ». - '. ■>. ' ■" •■■ i' i;'-= ,A.••:;••••»: #y^iTiRFMENTS nn ATfV?; TO COM.ATtRALA. Borrower will tobaiit to S^ evidence of tilU JJ^LMa^fMdt in eJcew ofton Of faynwnt of orin**i'"fora uUsftctory to SBA Counsel nnd will b« niS5.000.00. Wk will DC i« »vitlioiit the price wrinai wnwnt of 5BA-itep nr LOAN proceeds dUutcr occurring in tlw •oath of Jg|y. I2L/ Borrow followiag specific ite«s or ereas; A. Aporoximately similar kind and quantity. a «p.ir/.cpu« 4i««.r “■ B. Approximately ....l2rA etc. n ,««ir/...»lM «!»•.«. wmllJ. «»««. c Appro.l~l.l> II.8W.W «. “'!*«>•. 1 “'^ **^ o. Appr..i«uly .■ MO M <» ..P.1./KPUC. dim». 4.MM4 toPdK.pi.t- R App>c>iip>i.iy imw-M « «“ *"“■ F. ApprPxiPto«l» ____mm tor dlmter cl...-.P PPd d.Ori, r.P.o».l «»P.»«» at rnneordia StreeL nmno. Minncsoia S3121 p G. Approximately <3-800.00 to repair/ieplace other disaster damaged Und improvements, including re»a«nine wall with fUL H. Approximately ^ ^ ^ mincluding wood pier. ..nnoo .0 rcpiir/feptoc o.h« di»«« d.m.l.d toPd |p>pro..«.»». L Approximately , including stairs. .,«,PO ,0 „p.i,/r.ptoc. OU... dta.«.r d.m.|.d topd in.pro..m<.a, s. ».r'iiip.v..N-r. .r.. .1.P OF I PAN PRQCEFnS ftNP KECEIPTS /«.!d receiotx oaid Invoices or cancelled A. Borrower will obtain nnd *funds $p«t and retain these receipu for 3 years checks) and contracts for all Loan und P subsequent disbursement (if any) from .h. d... of •>>« K .PCHand whenever requested by SBA, Borrower with copies of the r-ceiptx “• toip'c'c.::" .:s «Mnc«rVnh"SK :? L»rp«srihco »' S3 A Form 1391 (7-84)??»fi006IS- Page 2 ■\ «;;y A ^ i--Wy vm>0m:mmKI PNj-•■■:'■■ A:- AA^'# ■ Aw-A/. ' .f'’■’snaMBamKHT?" mmm'■ : V .•-•■• •-%••<yv-vy '■ 'f ,r--■m- . • •J .; -:''if /^ .vU;:v mi-"-tia-77»tiiy ».o.toxm47 • ST. PkxA, m mt-oij Hk^'m r:--»A^= i ’25C.DC s 4245.CO J 2500.CO $ ‘.COO.00 3 1250.00 S 10C45.00 ■. ,-.■.Iter' r;. ; ■'iltee $ 15CO.OO $ 2550.00 $ lOOOC.OO S 225v.00 „ « A .-,.-. • 2t t Lm ^ ^ P ■' W ■i-.r;^ '■■' r v.i •.•' .■• 0. r., wsWm^y'ru !:»•? :te*' a* '■’ p-/:,rr ”■=:%■ , m KSi^pfe'S? ;c0.-r^b^' i • . • V yn-- ......................A • r =v:..- V..--' 'ai4 wmii M: - - .o*‘ ; .* '.-4 V. i* ' '"■* ■*•■*;;:• 15 '4. •" , . *r,. 4 tt-'i*-' » -■••t;i- - .r:"‘ ®r.r,-» -.nATS-a -n« ... .................. ..a-: . J't •'” '•=-"■*=\-^-o=';-i^r;4a:r; iar ie r«. :«-60 --* *'^'- ",'* ' ' #... % wa*..--3’-- =a5»r«nt i. - r«av4 rA.--.»w*o ‘.-^a 'w-'/,’*-,rna5v.« ?.-a ■'^ '■-*‘\ -® ■-.- a.. •-■:.>• »■*•’ >'■• * “• ".! • . .r ■-■. -» *• ”"! j.c-.-.ora ».v .I--* _• ., ... »-.»r »ro r«e-a--» • • 4. . 9 . 4- rec«.it«d 144 ■.*-■-•'■ f .■.•►cr.-n -1 -,‘f : can 4 , - ♦• w -ar V a:t«rnai:v.a * ■'- ' 7 » T^r* .• . . -ai. --•.ip- . •■‘y ’* ”^*** ^’tr.v xte iJ'-e"- a^. .u —■« -^.r 0. r ’. • it'*-at'Tes.p.:. * Mmr- ;^PlHH|Eb., ;r:r' '\yyf" '■/'/■' Ar- ■••: : '■: r..-• ■: a;V ■.^• a;-:.^ •. . iv •.. a •;• r.\. ••■•v- -. .•.>.. ■ - ••• ■■.'< ■..'. ., '.:/... ■ ■'. ■■ '.■ ■ 4 ■. •; «4 ■3> 4 -iri MPa-i myrn-yF!-v* '..■ la .*••• ■. •mjsi:»lJ-TT9-»tt»P.O BOXM247 . tr.l»MA.im Ii101-«34r r-o-er'y •i. I vi«3 ocateo az askea zz •ihicn ara forced slooa Si.-'C ler grids which are reinforce the jO'' :,r.e failure c’:ar.e a j’.ooa is remo/uc to id if the material ich compacted 1 'i OS ' 11\ *31 n 11 * • A • a ;ompletion the iiusa jinrec assumed a * »«ct .cns are t;-.was*e a wrap arouns gr-, c ir.stalling timber, 5 similar to lincoln :or is fil’ed w. th f. is construstec. T.ie ec w-Tth a facing that eventually estaolisr. retcners). ”i‘-s use c“ t:.3 fOv.'.dat 1 on sf.'s c •the ya'S ai .•.‘Stem vii'.er. prccsr;,. COS'- 5'n to toe apcroAC.. was ti ^icle. " e for;w::.g t'l i fcr ‘ 1 *in9 ■■ .. ■ '..^V ■•- ■ . : 'N;.. ■ y-:.. y >■• ipSi*:y ^ \ V. , ■v-.i' ■ . ' ■ •. .i.- y.f - ■-.. -•. ■ : ' .•:•' ■ ■ • •'■ '■•■ 7;.- ^ mB MBim.IliK' i- )v^-rvr:yV^'/:.y -' >.'t* ■ ■■:.->.• ■-■-/..y-y- V- -.:f' :'. •• ■•:• =■ V ..i- -.i'.V ' ■ ■'••■‘C>.- ' WmMmB- ;••;:■ ■■'■:■• :••■•■• y■:.y^ V: y ■ ■:•!•', ••■: , ;’W .... W^'B t ■‘i.■ ■ ,. y/" ■ J ;■yjV'/' .•/ •-.Ni.■ySERVICE ENGINEERING mip^l^UMV . O.Mia.MB » »»-«•»vU't 3vNj’*uw is..*** “ Alternative A «, ^forcz-d alcs® £ >".0 A » At * wh Gr: a ^ac I a~em.ent Cleanup «c;' ,artu 445 /arcs jwO ya-os $ '25C.SC S A245.C.Q • 2500.:o $ iCOO.30 Profit a.ia cc.nf.ngenc Total s 1250. ;-J t tC0A3.C0 t; » C 31 ' :mwC r •:>00 yarCfc > i3 T - 3v0 S"*'Cr*. c.-*a 1 Prcf-t ana contingency $ i:-.: . :o S I55C.00 « lOsCrl.OO $ 225C.30 •^ - a; t B 7 •-» yy- ^ y^^y"' >■ K . ••:;•r'_ •/ ;-;l £;i;;iw:>••• 0.-: :^-. '^:i4^v:.- y/f ■:.':. if Iere possible. id by hand.Qrass seed is very unportant. The that will plant the seed about 1/2“ is not available, the seed can be led, then the entire area should be I slopes steeper than 3:1 ttta wffl isses are recommended ttte most fter the soil has warmed up over 60 Brage seeding date for Sudan grass, r from June 1 to June 30. If these generally do not perform as desired, Grass other than warm seison >m August 1 to September 15. lies can get the warm season grass in advance of your planned seeding ith Dakota; Miller Seed Company or ny of Healy, Kansas; and Peterson j these seeds on hand. eed approximately 100 five seeds per sed on a Pure Live Seed Basis (PLS) I seeds planted per square foot etc.) should be kept cut as often as n the competitive plants and give the a chance to increase. Supplemental ust in the establishment period. mmtmi H*'S.ir:i. Vr r r Or. ; •l. v.:-;•■'tv-, "• •- • '-A : •jilSijiWi::i||p ’-mmy: av .:' t- ■ ■'4- SgliPR; fa#SS3iii& H *1 r-< r t t*»3. , 3' lAires are coot enough to Kied lime ar^d fertilizer,8 same as during otherapply neede lime and mulch. Sow seed as a9 period shown in the e, or snow deeper than ithod. Summer jOsmad 8/1-9/15 8/1-8/20 11/1-4/1 11/1-4/1 11/1-4/1 11/1-4/1 rasses and woody plant fore the weeds begin to turing. :ies of weeds. Optimum rowth stages. Herbicide tch the three-leaf stage, nclude legume. thorized, registered uses 'iC applies herbicides is 3cal laws and regulations int Of Grass: i well worked: the same as for id prior to seeding to break up idbed must be soft enough to rm enough to prevent burying enough to support the weight 1/2 inch. The entire seedbed lases, heavy land roller or cultl- ■>. ■ -f ■ ■ ■ : V ■ : vv.v'^u. jUii^ci"-. •Areas f«x»s$isli to equipment shafl be scarttod by hand.4.2 Masftod d SM*» Propw plKanwt o> gr»s4 »•«) I* vwy impo^ nxst desMbl. I* to us« a gr»s$ (W that •« P*«dMo kt wet packed sol. « *ich a machine Is no« availafcla. the *««1 «»" ^bfo«)ca««l on the surtaca. tt tt» maewd is taad. then the antira area sh^ ba hatrowad iwiea immaelataly aiw seedinQ. On slopes staepar than 3:1 9»a «« generaBy mean hand harrowif^ etc, 4.3 Tine of seeding - If warm season grastai are recomm«ided the most desirable ame to seed warm season grasses is after the soi has warmed up over 60 degrees. TT^usoaBywil con «ip and with the average seeding date tor Sudan g^ At the 45° latitude. tNs would » s approximately from June i to June 30. B these grasses are seeded too early or in the fafl. they generally do not perform as dasirad. and win often resuli in a failure of the planting. Grass other than wann saaton grasses should be seeded before May 20 and from August 1 to Septamber 15. 4.4 Seed sources - Most large seed companies ran get the warm season grass seed if you wtti place you order with them wen in advance of your planned seeding date. The S®cayr Company of BrooWngs, South Dakota: Miller Seed Company o Lincoln. Nebraska; Sharp Bros. Seed Company of Healy, Kansas; and Peterson Seed Company, Savage Minnesota usually have these seeds on hand. 4.5 Seeding rate an.d mixture - Our go?! to seed approximately 100 Ih/e seeds per One other important item Is to order your seed on a Pure Uve Seed Basis (PLS). This will help guarantee that you win get 100 Hve seeds planted per square foot. 4 6 Management - An competition (weeds, etc.) should be kept cut as often as needed. Normally the cutting will help weaken the competitive plants and give the newly seeded grasses adequate sunlight and a chance to increase. Supplemental watering can be beneficial during July and August in the establishment period. <1 mmm ■= • : y. ., -./r 33:3 ■; . •• •• • ./ a::’ Mp.3SC^l.-3 - *lr 'isr*.Jebrig such as rocks, roots orace. Broadcasted seed shafl inch (between 1/2 and 1 inch mulch Is applied. uted by a mechanical or Itipacking, harrowing or jed and fertilizer in slurry shall provide continuous jous, non-fhwtuating flow ^ing or hand raking. seed Is sown. The mulch shall ilose blown or hand applied at a r. or 1,500*2.0CX) Ibs./ac. for the j satisfactory to the engineer for all be anchored by a netting black polypropylene extruded weight of 2.6 pounds per 1,(XX) : to Economy Erosion Control >et, St. Paul, MN 55101. t staggered centers, except on 1 1 to 2 foot spacings along the 4-6 inch overlap with the net on pies Inserted flush with mulch or f May 15 and July 1 and August 1 srmanent mixture listed in 3.7. No mnanent mixture. September 15 to November 1, the insisting of 10 pounds per acre and seeded and harrowed. After m ■ ■■■■■■ i'"' y£s W::V . > .w vr -. v^: .:a. Dormant sei ngs are made ^ter sod temper^ifiBi are cod enoug prevers germmation. Procedures for applying needed Ime ai^ fertuiseccfoed preparation, seeding arxl rnddiinQ are the same as during other seedirx]b. An dfomate method trf ckymarn seedng is to a^fofy neeCte time and fertiTzer, prepare a seedbed, arfo and arwhor rniicn. Sow seed as a dorm«Tt sae dfog cnv the nxilch dixing foe time period shown In foe Optimum Seedfog Period Table. Do not seed on ice, or snow deeper than 2inchas. Dod^ seeding rates when usrtg this method. 3.13 Optimum Seedrg Period Rrasa/Le<;njme Soedes _QsmmEi Cod Season Grasses Warm Season Grasses Alfalfa; Red Qover B^foot Trefoil; Crownvetch 4/1-5/50 5/15-6/20 4/1-5/20 8/1-9/15 8/1-8/20 4/1-5/20 3.14 Estabfohment Management a. Control undesirable broadlaaf weeds, weedy grasses and woody plant dOTie before foe weeds begin togrowth as needed. Clipping should be done before foe weeds begin to compete for mdsture and pnor to waed seeds maturfog. b. Herbicides may be used to confol some species of weeds. Optimumi control will be obtained when weeds are in early growth stages. Herbicide applications should be cMayed until grasses re^h foe three-leaf stage. Do not apply herbicides to seeding mixtures ti^t include legume. Herbicides shafl be applied in accordance with eBjfoorized, registered uses and directions on foe label. The individual who applies herbicides is responsible for complying with federal.state and local laws and regulations goverrung foe use of herbicides. 4.0 General Recommendations in The Establishment Of Grass: Seedbed Preparation - Area to be seeded should be well worked: the same as for a standard lawn seeding. Harrow or pack the seedbed prior to seeding to break up large clods and firm foe seedbed. The prepared seedbed must be soft enough to permit covering the seed and anchoring mulch yet firm enough to prevent burying seeds too deep. For example, the soil should be firm enough to support the weight of a person without sinking into the soil more than 1/2 inch. The entire seedbed should be uniform, friable and well packed. In some cases, heavy land roller or cultl- packer may be needed to get the desired compaction. mmmmcmmi \W' .. ./ •4^PiiHi:'bfizer, mutch, netfng. labor, tilize, and mulch tiie oiticalI practical upoflcomptafion ilching ahafl bo shapod to a ir seeded preparation. I of available ptent food pv qfl) qft) qft) )S/1000sqfl) t>y soil test) sd. Topsoil shall be friable, oam or clay loam) andshaO IS weeds or any substartce organic matter content of not . Topsoil containing soluble »f Federal Specificaiion ])]-S- as will be based on cure live seed shall be used: lbs/1Q0Qf^ 0.34 0.11 0.07 0.07 > and shape, fertilizer shall be tillage to a depth of 2 inches leeded as determined by soil 5. m---I'" W/ ■. :v • ■V7 . L'%f> %■ ^v- ■ :^v 'sA..'- ■' ■■■'■■■' .:■ mm w . - «ic: <m, ; w., U ,|fr IK -SI P;; 'W^'t •-v^!S ykm :v.- .■• :‘ V." -■ :.•■• . •■ • •" ;. .'■^ jb •.... • •i-.t-tree branches before seating.39 The seed Shan be spread uniformly on fr>e surface.an approxlm^i earth cover from 1/8 inch to 1/4 inch Cbe^,onmottsands)bydraooinoorhandra*«nob<^«^^ .a Broadcasting - Seed shall be unitary^rSoSe^ seeder. Cover the seed by cuWpaciang. harrowtog or hand rating- k, tn* «Md ^one of seed and fsrtBzar In stony 3,10 Mulcrtno sh.1 b. done Immediately ^ the seed eomW o< Clean hay. stray.. Of long (ttiered wood cefcJoee bicvm rata at 3JOO» 4.000 Bs. per «ra for hey and straw, or 1.500.2.000 Bs./^tor^ wood cellulose. The eontraciof wM provide a inethod saCsfactory to the enfllneef tor 5etenTvning toe weight cf mulch furnished. Netang from ConweO Corporation, 332 Minnesota Sffeet, St. PsJ. • All netting win be secured by staples on 4 to 5 loot staggered centers, esceot w the ends of the netting where staples will be placed at 1 to 2 foot SP»°"S» entire width. Adjacent or end to end nets will have a 4.6 inch ovehep with the . the upstream side of any lateral water flow on top. ^ ,,-s, nr staple will be 1- by 6- long, 11 gauge wire staples inserted flush with mulch or ground surface. 312 When construction Is completed between May 15 and July 1 and 1 and September 15 all sites win be seeded to the permanent mixture listed m 3.7. No dormant saedings win be made when using this permanent mixture. K construction is completed during the period of September 15 to November 1, the area will be seeded with a temporary seeding consisting of 10 pounds per acre perennial ryegrass planted with a grass drSI or hand seeded and harrowed. Arte toese dates a dormant seeding may be made. -■ . ' : .V . ■ ■•::•=■; V •••■■■ y - • ■: i'f,- •:.,..t;- Ri m I:-:.:;"-:.-'.-- ••smm.;..V ^ . . V ^ , , - . \'=?-i'v-^V ■ ^ by controlling three factors: 1)ro<rfU^ irds; arKl 3) seepage of ground water at taining walls. B directed, as much as possible, toward Irainage from fr» rear of the house can :e drains. In special cases, (frains c»i ■face drains should be six-inch diameter iguttered portions of roofs must bet jcity at any single point Landscaping surface water. Low walls or berms can ter ponded behind the walls must be ■s. Eight-inch diameter corrugated e drainage trom approximately 10,OCX) ;S0% grade). Inlets must be protected je onto riprap. Vents must be placed in I grade. jsive pressure exerted by ground water at ing along the contour at the toes of slopes excess pressure and prevent slumping. above. tative cover on steep slopes as quickly as eeding disturbed areas includes: wm ■■ • ,** :V' 4 m-f . . **- m • i- ^• ■ ;-Vu' Vt«- 'P-v-virSEiI/- :''v ::f- ■ j;,. : XX' •H- ' -i«WH mmmA "d i 7' it: :;•■■ • :hm 'mm,:,.: W.-^. : v; I VP >-=■ • • ^ tfPf - ^ Pmmimmmmy.f'5 fM •: ea UiIitLd■'it ;•: «•(« e'Atv i*..•v -.em.!!*! .It#'>4 ll*.* tf • i ♦• tl^ »il!^fttr^ •^§K'«e • i«1# •K'#. efcl nel«e[.'etrlHteV reriTel eMt,?i ► •TerifiTil W ^ •reT»W#l III*!#®!- [•TilTe r«rsi« r ■ -• . .•■•.■V. 'VrV mm p— ^ ,r,r . V-Vi - X Pt'X'iMV-- ■ :;■•■ ;• xx; Mry=vv:';x' . ■ . • ..7'. 7.7.-:® .:^ :'-7. 77,:: ■ ■ ' ■■'VKfPPWPX. <7 :7-,-:x--. P-i/i; myr:..:--:! mm"' 'flWS ; •->' •' -7i**^,;v7 5\" Xm Vrm m b ^V7 7.77:7X7'V.; ;- % :-7vV.-:V. * ',7-;;. • v:X;::-v:: V .• .: • V•■•:•" '-.-M 7.7.:U 7.7 7.7v7'X •■■.7 -7 • ■'■.X V x- 7- : ■••X :v:xv.77 •. -!? V :.» •• :• /. f. Y. baaag^-., >•::: • x: x. X .iPv •••Vi'X;v.' 'X ; ftv. :3|?-,-i I existing material. Clean dirt fill should 5t not have any depressions or bumps 3amy topsoil for the vegetative cover. ^graded to slopes no greater than 1 on tending the regraded slope at the toe, acting a retaining v^ail at the top of the ong the toe of all affected slopes and polyethylene perforated tubing Is line and grade in a trench excavated d spaces between the tubing and the 1 ends to provide outlets. Except for Unal graded surface. A rodent guard e the regraded slope. The retaining wall J not exceed five feet in height. Six-inch 3 walls using specifications cited above, jn as the bottom of the exposed wall and An engineer must be consulted for the tructures. jnka, Minnesota 55343 Telephone (612) 544-8572 .. -V • ■ ■■V- \.m- . V- ■ ■ •: v-'.v ■.fT = .’ 4 -V •.'• ■ 1 ,.u '&*■ La . ■ M !11 Si/; Im ■f! .'•-V'ZirZ'■'y,' ■ ^i0Ji$ wm : i#- »» V. . m. I % ^z: ■ zmrnzmmmsmmm mm/■;v#vV''-,.vZrZy - V ■••. • •' • .• • . • ■• • : * .*. : -I.': ..••‘V.•: . :•• ■ •: ■••■ .• ■= '•■• i- :• * i wk m2.Q PrevePfionFuture ero^ problerns can be prevented by Ksntrolfing three fictoft: 1) a^toage: 2) surface runoff from tawns and yards; and 3) seepage erf ground toe toes of steep irfepes and at frie base of ret^ntog walls. ei.elite fto(A should be guttered and the drftnege dfreded. as much as possible, toward toe street Whsr s gradtog permtts, rooftop dratoege from toe rear <rf the hewse ctfi be carried to toe «reei in tiTafiow sitosuface drafra. to specie c»es, drains c«i rooftop drainage down elope. Subsurface drains should be sbe-toen diametif e^rugi^ed polyetoytewiaigflriQaJBd tobing. Surface runoff from lawns, yards, or laiguttered portions of roofs must be> controlled to mtolmizo water volwne end v^odty at any single poirrf. Landscaptog should be modified to prevent channelling of surface water. Low walls cr berms can be constructed along toe slope crest Water ponded behind the waHs must be drained through sub* jrface storm sewers. Eight-inch diameter corrugated polyethylene unp^tffnrated tubing can handle drainage from approximately 10,000 square feat if it slopes greater than 1 on 2 (50% grade). Inlets must be protected from trash, leaves, etc. Outlets must discharge onto riprap. Vents must be placed to toe fine where there are significant changes to grade. Many slope faflures are caused by excessive pressure exerted by ground water at the toes of slopes. Subsurface drains running along the contour at the toes of slopes and behtod retaining walls will relieve the excess pressure and prevent slumoing. Standards for subsurface draias are given above. 3.0 Seeding and Mulching It is important to develop a good vegetative cover on steep slopes as quickly as posssible. The work to be performed for seeding disturbed areas includes: W. ■ ;-,:•••/>v.'. ■■■A•J zrmz y-yK-Z tMfiF'. mm . # ^ ..V m ) A' i mz ^Z'zK':•' ■■'/; - . J im >ZZ\Zf^ mzz:ZfUz 'T^'^/ZZZi % bout repairing damage cau^d i additional concerns on a site- B shoreline. Stabilize the shorn or structural support should be jpportBd by both tio^backs and t and ground water seepage, aining walls and at the toes of au questions. We would be happy r, if you see the need. . Minnesota 55343 Telephone (612) 544-8572 ttw>n*p*w Cewwiv»aoft Dtstrict ■ ' r Repairing Eroskm Damage SopeRestc»^^ Eroded arew can be restored by regradir^ eids^ rrurteri^. Ctoan din fiB should be used where additional material Is needed. The regraded surface must have a urtform slope with a level ooss-sectton; it must not have any depresstons or bumps. The fffl should be covered with four inches erf loamy topsoa tor the vegetative cover. Where posstole. eroded areas should be regraded to slopes no greater than 1 on 2 (50% grade). This can be achieved by extending the regraded slope at the toe, ttia stop# b^k at the cxest, or construettog a letaining v/all at the top of Six-Inch diameter dr^s must be kistafled along the toe of all affected elopes and behuid afl retaining walls. Corrugated polyethylene cgrToratfid tubing Is recommended. Drains shall be laid to a neat line and grad into undisturbed soil. There should be no void spaces betv walls of the trench after backfilling. Turn both ends to pro' outlets, drains must be three feet below the fin^ graded s must be placed over an outlets. liaTcBnl Retaining walls can be used to shorten the regraded s should be placed at the top of the slope and not exceed fiv drains must be installed behind all retaining walls using sp Drains should be placed at the same elevation as the botton four feet behind the wall where possible. An engineer m design of retaining walls needed to protect structures. 205 Ridge Pta^a B'd» 12450 Wayzata Boulevard Minnetont^linnesote^ ^ . .1,: :V-- m * • .V• ‘ • 7 •••• V • •itilWa ij-"-It for a portint , The 1 of the he best pleasing level of ting and nder the lid more ons. We > avoid a {surface tcry largo ! slope to the slope . grade no >m of the ow at any ater to an rain other problems :red here, problems. Is must be lis erosion slopes less controlling new water H*nn«pin Con»«»vatton District 0T r«s • m,--•• ** *■ : -4i‘.'• -'V ’ ■ ■■■jtftr'. %. "■im i-. •• i•.•••.•• memorandum John Waldron James Piegat. Ph.D. 14 Augu^ 1987 SUBJECT: Repaiiing Erosk»i Damage by-site basis. SSSSSSsSSS vertical posts. regradM slopes. Please contact our office if you t^ **te ^ssMrtcular solutions with your contractor, K you see the need. 205 Ridge Plaza Bldg. 12450 Wayzata Boulevard Minnetonka. Minnesota 55343 Telephone (612) 544-8572 '*1;. ' ‘i,. - ■v^ H ill ■pi im-:fern JL **' P . ■■■■ ■ (mm ;Vr mm: m>-\ . ■■ • »■: y- 11.1; rf m--':-'V i ■, VAi; • ■■ -••S m < -v-fl <yy-yy:n:v-=.p : = •••. •= ;.\ V*. <• i .■.••• "r-: 'm: ym. ■i. /■i 1 •'.4 Ifellllil Wyyym * •■'ii-'.'w ^imus^y: yyyy^m^y^ • .-y -.« ::7” property atlon District to comment on his ng the heavy rains of July of this r: 1) aesthetic considerations, 2) ence. :ies of plants would present the ind users of the lake. The use of easons. Mr. Waldron's proposal lis is the best remedy to alleviate ntioned below are satisfied. he effects of urban and suburban loney has been spent toward that :k between the filtering effect of >sion of physical and chemical threshold is whether the surface singly small percentage of land ansport of solids and dissolved nsport of dissolved substances by a positive step in dealing with y to the lake, ne has avoided all iverted to the streets or even his ess of this system to prevent fill thereby remove most of the Minnesota 55343 Telephone (612) 544-8572 '''' ' i . -.p-. rnsmm v#' 'xm jjr ,solution, given the state of knowledge, is to choose the most aesthetically pleasing desit^u that avoids an increase in impervious surfaces.Mr Waldron's proposal also includes a deck that would be instiled at *1*®the first floor. ^S>^ld improve the surface runoff situation W ^ Sf“o?y ”nf.ll much as .reel do, Houwr. it is importsm that the «ea under the deck not 1^ paved or made impervitHis. 3. Prevention of Recurrence recurrence. This can be done Iw installing subsurface drams, controlling surface runo^ and avoiding retaining walls where possible. fail just abwe the level of the lake. With this support removed, the rest of the slope quickly failed. The most important step to prevent recurrence is to regrade the slope to a gradc^ steeper than*50%, revegetate, and install subsurface drains at the bottom of the slope. The drains will prevent excessive ground water pressure. arerwhete hno longer h«''the enelw w'erode or ^e opportunity to entiain other materisds. ^her landscaping can be done to avoid the channeling of flow. __..^11.. ♦/% lonHc/^nma nrnhlerniL not drSlin^lSLC plTOblCinS. that are caused Dv grounu waicr couuiuuiuj auiuiai Retaining walls are a solution to landscaping problems, not ^^^inage problei^ Subsurface drains must be placed behind all retaining walls and the walls must be properly designed. 4. Summary quality problems. K;: -l': m \ : ;; . i’i.sVr !. '•!. ■•.If mm .*/■ SBRSte-iK'v m&Kmrnm mmm mrnmn■..i. iii; mm 1 '4 ■.'V M >5^1;'' '' ^'-:•\i•V^■■' « ^::X.Vi-¥": : >-v;^*-^:v:v 1- r^-- ■ : 'r'< :iV' ■ ■ •> ^■1 / ' 'Wl* '•mm i Sm- ...«. •• Mff Memorandum Dfono rtititw- kgat, Ph.D. mber, 1987 d repairs to the John Waldron prt^rty rtfojii asked the Hennepin Conservation District to comment on hb • .tt# .it • #Vl ^ *•7 f•TtTtWI ■ fcTi oage done to his property during the heavy rains of July of this i three concerns m this matter: 1) aesthetic1) aesthetic considerations, 2) ty, and 3) prevention of recurrence. r#Tfwn ations es vegetated with native species of plants wotdd present the_ wir« MtSilt] asing landscape to neighbors and users of the lake. The use of 1 be minimized for aesthetic reasons. Mr. Waldron's proposal sting slope and vegetate it This is the best remedy to alleviate rrovided that the concerns mentioned below arc satisfied. fuality that enough is known about the effects of urban and suburban lality, although considerable money has been spent toward that IIF*4i immure imoff, a balance must be struck between the filtering effect of tensi^ raiidalls and the erosion of physical and chemical ler intensity events. The key threshold is whethc." the surface reaches the lake. A surprisingly small percentage of land ) surface runoff. St be struck between the transport of solids and dissolved water to the lake and the transport of dissolved substances by reHTiliKSil Waldron has already taken a positive step in dealing with ke, n<Ip. By piping that water directly to the lake, he has avoided all unofi could entrain if it were diverted to the streets or even his must maintain the cleanliness of this system to prevent the underground pipes and will thereby remove most of the therwise be carried to the lake. ayzaia Boulevard Minnetonka. Minnesota 55343 Telephone {612)544-8572 V V . : '-iJi • • •: .-r-^AAiVi Mr.walkthatimprwatesoluldesi*Mr. the i reta decl 1. *. ;. . \ . ■ •'W ■ '■ ■ * - _ *:^ ■ ' >■ y\.::-:-0r0'm'■■ M ^ • -•'■■V:^ ■- ■■•'i’ii P'i»!|i';;:.|:J.i#'.v;: D JULY 21• 198^ this matter and tho llt40 P.M. for hia by O aJrman Kelley# to onal uae permit and a to create a walk-out laff recommendation- certificate of Mailing Gaffron explained the lit for guest house use in conjunction with :;reB each into a single rlie Thorpe# owns the :he property to Maxwell e. This will allow barn meeting the 150' B# and allow 7 hors's nting Mr. Maxwell and td in hand. Lc regarding this matter 1. osed because it was bad e property just for the llahan. ffron noted that once might not be allowed properties would be s zoning area. hns complied with the the lust meeting. m-- ml / ^■.■■yyi' -.V jx-y-K, - -i ■ • ' ■ V " fc ’i-i. :- J= ;r; RfF:-:yi\ : ; f:, . ^ . •; '.f •:■••= »:-S» 5*" -'■ ' i IT*' *:*?«»--X.^ ,v: >:■; m: % ’ • ..•* * *'•■ - . »■■• ; V ' •• ,, A*^• ■ ti ^ • . ;*-:^£a'X-9 . r'-"'cm * iI • la€ <m9 tm m • I « m i HI mf HI HmfHI P9 ft ft c ne 1 9m0mm m« a«w H M T ^umiMat. H M • WlMirH. 9f Ml O Le^Mn H » t 1#**^ ^ f «Miwa, Mi ciMi 1 Maff*kam «m %mBonestfM Rosene Anderflk & Associates ifigawtfi i Arcfittietl fabruary 1. i*®i City of Oraae Sox Ml Crystal »ay. O SS321 attai Ks. Jaasna Habeith Kai rila »B. Jolui laierom Paar JaaBma, Th. r«xiaad alia aubmlttM ea tha John faldron proparty indicata. ann*-»“..«U tba 0-75 foot lakaskera Mtback ataa. It l« attimataa rn*i. cu.yds. of satarlal aould be ramoaad. ?^rin:r “o- -ACUOS 1. «.ch.r^^^ .. . r...u of this iaproaawMt. If you haaa any quattKmi. plaa«a contact thia office. Youra aery truly, tOHESTtOO, ROSniE, aHDERLlK I ASSOCIATES, T>»C. Glenn t. Cook GRCtU 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 :r••. ...'. . ■- T ■ . ■ ■. ■ .. ■■ , .,:-3 ....... ■'. V. r/’■••::, - IPs .••■•:. .A -X: m V m -.r -. .. . wMy0 t.-'f ■: . ■ V ■ , ■ WK:fcliSir;:.-, mmmifli?>..:=i:n' i.: : .< ^;; p|iii|;;|| * m ■(' ' a-" ' :j: - .0.1 yM . ; ' ' |K:^ '^;Xyyy.'y^ .D JUNE IG, 1986 d by Goettenr to »n provide addit for the City Eng impact on lake 9r's opinions. M< Certificate of Mailing iffron explained the construct a detached ' in the 75-250' from lat applicant does not proposes to remove 2 oted that removal of a the hardcover to 1.6% .ng work that would be lately 90 cubic yards lal use permit. his matter and stated also (resulting in a 250' - total 34.5%). •e wan a real hardship property. regarding this matter >nded by Kelley, to :e. subject to staffs ind subject to removal il hardcover will be mmmm•'.V'. '.:c.-rr.-v:V. ■ - . '!" mm ■mM v-‘ ■mm - --m ifewii ••*? t:. iiieisj • ■'»' X-I ^ ’Liv: 1'^ ‘V’i h-'..- .y- :..;•v::.;.-V..- V .M M mQ'y:■ :'■■ % Ifp-r In n;V , .■ ■ •■ ■ i/'l mWfm or rm nMim oamimm mcstiik boa wly 21, iw BOSS! igtiT COMCOBDIM ST«*rr ws^iiaigK/COimiTlOWM. OSE WWIT - SaCOMD lUVXBI John .................hot Pt.i.ht tot tot* “‘r'S* ?« h5:Planning Coa»lssion waited until lli40 P.M. for nx» presence to act on his request. T, wsa Moved by Bellows, seconded by Q^airman Kelley, to U";.»o Of. •r";.vr«i\4’?variance to regrade iakeshore yard to create a wait^uc basement configuration per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Y^ys 0. •1042 TBOMAS J. MWOiELL 36t5 IIATBkTOIfll KOhD CCMDITICMJL OSB PBWIT PUBLIC BSMUlhS 7t57 - tlOSThe*iffidavit of ptibll-atlon and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant toning Administrator Caffron explained the reauest for conditional use permit for guest house use of ..eonr..T.tlB9 f.ia.nc, in oonjunctlon -ith ,<naihination of 2 parcels of ♦ 5 seres each Into s single paTcil! Mr. Msi^eir. sunl:, Arlie Sdj.c.t prop.tty »■><» -ill <>•«» ‘’'.'’ffl'li?! .TjLi ionrtVuVuln or.*n.« "."nSS T^hoM^osetback from all property lines, and allow 7 hors maxlmua. Jack Ebort was present representing Mr. Maxwell and stated that he had the signed deed in hand. Ko one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. rai lahan stated that he was opposed because it was bad aoning t planning to combine the property just or e purpose of sllowin9 ® horses. Bellows and Goetten agreed with Callahan. Assistant zoning Administrator loSed <-h« orooertles were combined they might not be ®1*° ®.^ub°jrni. .9hln bec.u.. the *>* substandard In the required 5 acres zoning area. Tavlor stated that the applicant has complied with the ??ainin9 Colibsion-. dirSctlon at the la.t meeting. McDonald agreed with Taylor. Sm M"::,VSSf ;••• . Jit- ■'••• .'•■ • " ■ lELD curred with staff's lie regarding this matter ed« ided by Chairman Kelley# n's interpretation that :, that no variances are ;ed to no more than 1000 back from the alley and staff be Instructed to tion# Ayes 7# Nays 0. Id Certificate cf Mailing r Gaffron explained the permit and variance to ate a walh-out basement City Engineer Cook# per I felt disruption of the gative impact on Lake ommend approval of the B matter and stated the was mainly to finish the try and solve the water he hydraulic pressure on a letter from Engineer le measures that would be 5n into the lake. in favor of this because ain reaction in this type ipplication be table for Rovegno. r damage was a legitimate (lie reqarding this matter iod. mmMm m:.. ■ ■- <V-!• 'V-^-: j ;v' ■ m ^&:y- 'v/Bmwh y-:> yy ■!/?:* ).■ i . .yXmm. . :. .' V ••.•.•"'I mmy--WM 0>C^- •p:-:-yr*;-^y %■<*>i■**Sv Mfe..%■■:-^ySW .-Ji-; y>4 mi - ‘ • ..' ••... '':V:. ./. : •?.. /.; ■ • -.f;: ■•.■■ -y-Ia VJf • • V . :..":• • ; . .*.* : *• -.. .•}bm \dL^’ '^1^- -•r «imrrt» or tm rLARNxitc cohmissioh NncTiiic held j^aii u, istfi m ■ ' . BOSSS OOlIT Xt was m«ved by Kovegno. secondedi by CoetieB, to table i?i* applicant can provide additioral bydraeli c/hydro logic infonsatioa for the City Engineer i®i also review iepact on lake and Mighter s properties# and neighbor's opinions. Notion# Ayes 7# Mays 0, •lOM Otmom ■. mo imioob Av»<a VASIAMCBroBLic nyyuM otoi - tt47 fiMi Affidavit of Publieation and Certificate of Maltinoi was noted. - I Aeeistant losing Adeiniator Caffron explained the hakdeover varianca requast to*construct a detached garage (2.f% increase in hardcovar in the 75-250* froai 32.5% to 35.0%). Gaffron noted that applicant does not "•J* •” exisitinq garage and proposes to ramova 2 ®*i*^i*'g storage sheda. He also noted that raaK>val of a 3rd existing shad would reduce the hardcover to 1.6% incraese. Ha explained the grading work that would ba conalating of approximately 90 cubic yards irtilcn not require a conditional uaa panalts Gordon Me Ison was present for this statter and stated , *5 w* ^ ^ remove the 3rd shad also (resulting in a 1.6% hardcover Increase in the 75-250* - total 34.5%). y'i Goetten stated that she felt there was a real hardship involved with the severe slopes of property. w No one was present from the public regarding this matter and tha public hearing was closed. y0K,:- * vdiiaitf?:'It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley# to recomir :.nd approval of the variance# subject to a'*«ff's hardship findings and conditions and subject to removal of all 3 sheds and no additional hardcover will be allowed. Motion# Ayes 7, Nays 0. m V=--.: --mi siSiSi^XviL- 'r":;-- .,:Vj • • • • * •• • ; :,Tvs ;; p. w; ■ . PillI • . .•;.4 ” vV- . y y:yy-^-yyyy :4;;Vr U-. mmy :.'v- mmy^11 < • 'i-M p ... ■ ■ . M- y-yx-t-y Ky-yyXy, W'yyyy-i yH y*’yxyyy:iy • .'-V^ "> yv-'v.-v/rv" i:yy-riyi::->yyy - l-Mi\ -':• . * •*: ; : r^- 1?:' !' ■■'■ 'h n ill .. ■ V--" diMm mx: ■ •'J: >-VfS' •■i. •/•: E'vS'Sx'' ! ■'.y- ' ■m IBLO nOVEMBBR 16» 1987ded by Brown, to recoimnend j cuts to create a waU^out submit a revised proposal epair and maintain bis approval of the lakeshoro ! as proposed conditioned le 9'x 14' deck at the edge net increase of 37 s.f. of recommendation. Motion, Hanson abstained. and Certificate of Mailing! this matter. ■the~fact conditional use ipgrading and expansion of I Boat Works. The Orono he larger boats currently ty. Council conceptually November 9th meeting. i facility must store the the Orono facility needed th a safer style which are with the remodeling of the o longer store the larger ;]uirements. the public regarding this was closed. seconded by Johnson, to ff recommendation. Motion, m .V" m wi ftXmJTES or THE PLAimiHO COHMISSIOM M££TlHt: RELO COT. Planning Comal interpretation. 4I:JOHn 16, 1986 j concurred with staff *m and the public hearing was cloeed. It was moved by Coetten, seconded by Chairman Eel ley* due to the Planning CcwMaission's Interpretation that thin is an alley, not a street, that no variances are required if structure is reduced to no more than 1300 s.f. ..ad maintains the 10* setback from the alley aad doors open to the sidei and staff be instructed to refund the application fee. Motion, Ryes 7, Mays 0. •i0l7 JC 1951 COWCOitp:€xminamkL wot pskhit tomac RBIJaMC 8i28 • 8i40 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate cf Mailing was noted. Assistant toning Administrator Caffron explained the request for conditional use permit and variance to regrade lakeshore yard to create a walk-out basement configuration. He noted that City Engineer Cook, per his letter, indicated that he felt disruption of the bank could result in a negative impact on Lake Minnetonka and does not recommend approval of the grading plan. John Busse was present for this matter and stated the purpose of creating a walk-out was mainly to finish the basement, provide light, and to try and solve the water problem by means of releasing the hydraulic pressure on the foundation. He submitted a letter from Engineer Mark Gionberg which explained the measures that would be taken in order to prevent erosion into the lake. Kelley stated that he was not in favor of this because of his concern of creating a chain reaction in this type of request Bovegno suggested that this application be table for more review. mms mm. St- • - i -A-.: :• v mmm Goetten agreed with Kelley and Bovegno Taylor stated that he felt water damage was a legitimate hardship. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. i. ■Ai ^7 . 1 ^1^ OVEMBER H, 1987if retaining wallnaive cost* are 1®** naturally vegetated the stabiliaatlon of cm" event. o require sowe grading tlined in hie letter staff*8 packet. as an ordinance and Ln the 0-75* lakeehore ernativee within the to solve the erosion as any connection with the neccessity for a (trolling the erosion I. ■■■■■■■ ■ Wt ilaced hay bales at the lave since been pushed j replace. E a silt fence at the ore. stated they had a „ property they owned, d effective was cutting they found the proposal Iternatives offered by Conservation District ( not allowed alot of and found very little 5 recommendation vs. the jervation District. He taff recommendation of study the information ndation, and recommended Erom the public and the Sifc..e.tutfR» or m Ftjynme cofoassxca Msmac bslo rortbiiisb i«, haumi CQirriwnIt was moved by Bellows, sec«Kl«d by Brown, to recommend denial of the proposed grading cuts to create a walkout and recoivend that applicant submit a revised proposal for grading in ordar to repair and eaintain his lakeshore bank: and rectamnend approval of the Iskeshore deck propoael near the house ss proposed conditioned upon concurrent removal of tha 9'n 14* dack at tha edge of the slope, resulting in s net incraasa of 37 s.f. of 0-75* hardcover - per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayen 4, Mays 0, Abstention 1. Beaeon nbetelned. • 1224 MIlOaTCnA BOAT H0KS8 1449 SaOBBLIMB DUMB ______Amn-tn-rAcv oBBXTiowa o» pcbot /vabiabcbi POBUC fpw^wrwg lQtBB-'lB<12 ... . — -The Affidavit of Publicatlcai and CertificstB ©f Mailing were noted. Byron Beimerk was present fix this matter. Habusth explsined the sfter-ths-fact conditional use permit/varisnce request for upgrading and expansion of the boat lift St Minnetonka Boat Worke. The Orono will servlc# 3 of thw lar^or bo^ts curironbly stored at the Waysste facility. Council conceptually approved the request at their November 9th meeting. Bellows asked why the Orono facility oust atore the larger boats at this point? Byron Heimark explained that the Orono facility naeded to replace their boat lift with a safer style which are wider than the old style: and with the remodeling of the Waysste ficillty, the-* can no longar stora the larger boats and meet the perking requirements. There wero no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing wee closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Johnson, to rectMRmend approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ■In H;- HBES 16, 1967ificate of Hailing conditional use that was damaged wishes to repair create a walkout retaining wall at :he slope and seed 0 includes a deck iuse where no deck es to reduce some :ters and a sealed ct transportation hrough a pipe is ophy that all roof 1 travel over and ion purposes prior ter and explained tis proposal. He >an to be used for nprovements. He eshore bank is a be remedied and I the slope is the ,er from Hennepin ddresses the slope the best solution. 1 can only have a and welfare of the n future pollution if* and by adding a proposal will only of the property in transportation of d that runoff from \ot be detrimental uld use perforated tives to applicant's application in order mm um::. •V m- mm mrmms or 9%Kamvm coewssfoii i«mws wxm mmsma li, milun woi»i noted the drawback, of retaining wall endstabiUsetlon Vx*tenaive cost, are less to •oft€n tb«r slop®* . w4«addressed the many issues outlii*^ in his letter dated October 22. 1667 included in eteff s pecket. . JV"Vo ‘iV.* t;i‘Vr«r.*» conforunc* ®* («•! any connection »lth t::irr-inr;hJ ‘««. *d*.«,T:nd tn. .'.c«..ity mr. walkout. john.on .olcd conc.tn .ith c^tfolUn, tho oto.lon until the etorm damage ie repaired. «p"or lopV but?“ .vS^y*d^n the slope which he intend, to replace. st.ff .u„..t.d ““ •*bottom of tho elope et the lakeshore. Cthy LOO. l»‘5 ^'AT.nror'op«« thSy oJlntd, olnlX.r t,“?o"d ...’^cuttln, Stn‘t*ho°Vl'o^r M . neighbor, thoy (oond the propoeel less objectional than "cribbing . included a walkout. Brown noted th.t the City ‘VST.ry*ittt?i grading Bnqineer'. recomoendation ve. thedifference in the Citi ^ n4«frict He ?“co»o.nd.tion ricoone^^^^^^^^ ofwould therefore agree with stair denial . H.n.on felt he would need to study the JSrther 't!L‘f«e oaring a r.cooncndation, and racoonended tabling the application There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. ■■ ‘uM=:;<;imsmi:--4 y--< -LUG BBLD DBCl >»:uM 14, l»i7 : and requested that thie Ing submission of additional .member Sime, seconded by > table this application per n. Ayes 5, Nays 0. :or this matter. Ison explained the request for over variances to replace an : with a somewhat larger deck uture proposed gasebo on the e. Staff finds that there is ardcover on the property that ed to offset the hardcover »r Goetten, Mr. Gilbert stated cutting into the bark to ted that the neighbor to the )jection to the gasebo and put triance approval was valid for >ek, seconded by CounciImember 42322 approving the variance 5, Nays 0. Ison explained the request for struct a residence on Tract B nmission recommended approval :ess easement to be located Staff notes that locating the irely in Tract D reduced the of that lot and therefore, driveway easement be moved between Tracts A, B, S> D rv--^' . ^ • ••:■■■ yy.-: .. •.S:"1:4 4 U. 19t7mams or tss njynnao ccmissioa asmac «*to ao«r«r -11221 Jcaai s. _____tlisi COaCOK>lM 8TBBT coaoiTicaao. m maxTPUBLIC nMlS6 ^ PttbXicatioa and Certificat. of Mallinq war* noted!• CaffroB explained the req est for a conditional use Mrstii to repair tha lakesnore bank that was damagad ^ring the "super storm". Applicant wishes to re^lr the damege by lowering the grade to c.-eate a from tha existing house, construct e retaining wall^ that cut up to tho hottsa, and rograde tho «lopo and seed It along tho lakeahore. Propoeal also includos a deck extending from the west side of tho houae whara w> deck previomaly axittad. Applicant profM>eoa to housa hardcovar by Installation of guttars end a sea lea pipe straight to the lake. This direct trensportetlon of roof runoff water to the lake through a pipe Is directly contrary to the City ’s philosophy that all and other herd surface runoff should trowel over and through tha ground surfaco for filtration purpoeao prior to reaching the lake. John Waldron was present for thie matter and explained that tha storm was tha impetus of this propose^ He explained the conditions of the SBA loan to be used for repairing the lakeshore and house improvements. He stated the damage to the steep lekeshor* bank is a sarious physical hardship that must be remedied and believes that his proposal to raduca tha slope is the best solution. Be submitted e letter from Hennepin Conservation District which ha feels addresses problem end supports his proposal as the best solution, in general, he felt that the proposal can only hava a positive effect on tha health, safety and welfare o conanunity, by nrotecting the lake from future pollution as a result of erosion and other runofl, and by • walkout and deck to the property, the proposal will only have a positive effect on the values of the property in the surrounding area. Regarding roof runoff through pipe, he contended ^5®? the roof ia clean, therefore, would not be detrimental to lake quality. He noted that he would use perforated pipe if necessary. Hanson noted the three ether alternatives applicant's proposal and suggested tabling this application in order to review the alternatives* m A'.V -ij...Pi It.- : . •••: vyj,'4 -■r. :■:. •, - dWifen*-ART 11, 1989Sron If th# ■torm ;>ropo>al without a certain extent ite to allow the n with repairing by Counci Iweaiber use pernit and dron if he would >n of the walkout made the request ler made a similar based on the fact He felt in his isented a definite »mplete alteration restoration of ed the request for ch and deck within inning Commission esign allowing a h only. Applicant n's recommendation matter and had no ahan, seconded by oiution #2344 per drafted. Motion, •!*.’. "I' " ‘ ;; ■ •'? • S'-S . . I _ • ■:1i fsii r.1 - * . , w ' - • *1 • ‘ w mm h ■ ^ ;• 'V\:-'/v-'r'H *:•■ ■-y;IlMTO Of TO MCOIAR OKS» COWCll. HarriK IM* WKW>*^y»J1IWTR5 I^22) kom B. KAUMMBi i^TOMCORP IA 1 ‘IRAIT CoonnORAL os* WRWTyWll^* present and requeeted that thl* informmtiOB froa him. T* was mowed by CounciImember »ime, seconded by CounciImembee Pet-raon. to table *** applicant's reqeeat. Motion, Ayes 9, Mays 0. fl22S JAW eiLBSKT 995 TCNBMiA WO VARIAMCB ^ascumcm 12322 James Gilbert waa present for this matter. City Administrator lernhardaon UJ^jV^ianavaraee setback andi hardcower wariances to replace an IiriJilg Slllpld* ted deck with a somewhat deck and oatio s'’stem with a future proposed gasebo on the lita^^iore tide Sf the home. Staff finds that there is iittl'. or no extraneous hardcower on j!J could feasibly be removed to offset the hardcover increases proposed. in respoi %e to CounciImember Gotten, Hr. he does not intend on cutting into the bark accoAodat^ thm fuw dack# <*nunoi imamber Goattan n->tad that tha neighbor to the h.VJ« .oic.V.ny ooLctlon to th. ,...bo .nd put lppUc.“ o"notlc. th.t v.runc. .pprov.l — v.lld lor one year only. T^ wan moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember “.^^opt *«^lutlon #2332 .pprovin, th. t.rl.hc. as proposed. Modon, Ayes 5, Mays 0. #1126 fllMTOM MOLD 4650 NORTH SWMUB DRlVl VARIAR^ RESOLOTIOM #2323 City Administrator Be-nhardson a lot area variance :o construct a residence on sublect to a 20* wide access easem-nt to be located antirelv within Tract D. Staff notes that locating the entirely witnin in Tract D reduced the20' driveway easement entirely in Tract therefore, defined buildable area of that lot and the recommends that the 20' 4. d. further south and bo split between Tracts A, B, i'Srvi': f ■ •r • , IG HELD JAHUART 11» 19tS present for this «iatter» son explained the request to that was damaged during the e grade to create a walkout construct a retaining wall louse^ and regrade the slope ishore. Planning Commission walkout cut» feeling it was ization of the bank erosion, the walkout cut would set a current City philosophy. He tions where a walkout and/or n the 0-75' lakeshore setback [ships were present in these in the Waldron application. ling Commission recommended el deck as proposed subject to existing platform structure lerally agreed with Planning lotos of his property and if level ground at the top of he storm, and he would like •essing the City's concern on and quantity of runoff into 3 been established that his y effect the lake. 1*8 statement. City Engineer very little difference in the noff water with any of the ,t grading would be required Bsthetically, he felt his :he other options. Ke stated volve less earth disturbance, posal would provide a better »m the house. He noted thi-.t obtained, the amount of his afford the options of ■ *_______ 1 ^ W j storm damage issue deemed . . PPi- •ep m wamum mam cobmcu. mibtxw:I JAHOAHT II, IfAACounci Is^mber Callabas asked Nr. Waldrc.i if the etorm damage could be repaired using his proposaX without craatioa of the walkout. Nr. Maldron stated it could bu dona to a curtain eztaat tut Hcmld create less useable flat yard area. Nayor Grabak felt it was inappropriate to allow tha creation of tha walkout in conjunction with repairing atorm damage. xr was moved by Kayor Grebek, se«mded by CounciImember Callahan, to deny the conditional use permit eedl variance as propoas^. Councilmamber Paterson sskad Mr. Waldron if ha would have made tha raquaat for the creetioni of the walkout lhad tha atorm damage not occurred? Mr. Waldron stated he would not have made tha raquaat based on the feet that the previous owner made a similar request for a walkout and wae rejected based on the fact that there was no physical hardship. He felt In his case at this time, the storm demsge prasentad a definite physical hardship. Councilmamber Sima also fait that a cca^leta alteration was inappropriate in conjunction with restoration of storm damage. Notion, Ayea 4, Raya 0. • 122t RICHAJOl HAM»m 3S2S CRBUtT AVSHUS RBK>LDTIOH 12344 City Administrator Harnhardson explained tha request for a variance to construct a 3-season porch and deck within the 75* lakeshore setback area. Planning Commlsaion recommended approval subject to redesign allowing a sliding door on the south aide of porch only. Applicant has ctwiplled with Planning Commission's recommendation to redesign plan. Richard Hanson was present for this matter and had no comments or questions. It was moved by Councilmamber Callahan, eemnded by Councimember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2344 per planning Cossiission recommendation as drafted. Motion, Ayes Nays 0. 1^^ .. .;•- v.v..; ^ :8, I9i8needed more f policy and ated the 5 :he Planning ounr i. Imenber review and on. Motion# ent for this a proposed 5- 111 be served -site testing area for on- sting is not 5+ acres in extension be -A mvarws or m wmmjm mem• 122S JOOi WALDfKNl 1951 COHCOBOIlIk STKOT COK)1T10HM> QiB rtWUT/ VAUMCB %laCXL 8BBT1IK3 WMLD JAKAn 11. 1*88 ':\'yy^y'J,c m-y' lit r:.:: ■ ■■. f i. ..■ .: John end Lj^nn Waldron i#ere present for this natter.wimsmmmrecoa«eaded denial of the walkout cut, feeling wa» not related to the stabilisation of the bank •fosion. and finding that allowing the walkout precedent in conflict with current City cited two previ<ms application# where a walkout and/ g«Sng^efi allowed Within the 0-75* Lne. however unique hardships »•*■• cases that are not present i»* the Waldron applicatioo. per staff eeeo. Planning Cos»lsslon approval of the ground level deck as proposed subject to concurrent reeoval of the existing near the lake. Staff generally agreed with Planning Coavission's recoaaendation. l?i%Vd ‘'??at ’ftV^f e'lt'’of°\eve® proposal would not adversely effect the lake. In response to Mr. Waldron’s statement. City Engineer Cook stated there would be very little difference in the actual quality of the runoff water with any of the options used. Mr. Waldron explained that with any option used. Aesthetically, he • oroDOsal is preferable to the other options. he stateo ?harhis proposal would involve AS a safety issue, his proposal would view of the lakeshore from the house. He noted thit based on estimates he has obtained, the disaster loan would not afford ®** that stabilisation fabric, cribbing, or ^ would stand up for years. *^«9arding setting a precedent, he felt that the storm damage issue deemed his application unique. y- j: : .■ • ’ ■ ■ ■ ■> Wii ; -viv; ,-:V ■' . -' v •:= ■ ■ : -1• Vy-\-AJ: M.FBBfiOART 8, 19B8 Kplained the revised a in relation to the ided by Councllnenber 2363 approving the /es 5, Nays 0. plained that Council ivatlon cut at their ;ant r.as subsequently 3' deep flat-bottomed md a balcony from the ntlon of the existing aff recommended that e Planning Commission Lan does not indicate the lakeshore bank. matter and explained lakeshore yard area, to eliminate the need oposes to repair the the slope where the It the remaining bank vent future erosion, re 500-600 cubic yards ‘oposal would involve soil disturbance. He ction regarding thJ s ick to the Planninc, more information from offer any conceptual h Mayor Grabek noting formation on soil ■ L..s'm ">V. .y.. V,/yy-,.. v ; P:iS '.ct • ' : 3 ; .i. - Sir Aj'tA T-.-':v, ■ ^ "j •y|ii r V-!1 » C... ‘^ 'tit %.*■muBraa m tm la^iuai mam comm MBmws i11223COKffXWtSB^Council indicated to Mr. Valdron that they needed more information to make a declaion based on City policy and City hdniniatrator Bernhardson delineated the 5 alternatives that should be analysed for the Planning Commission and Council. tOMT B, ItBI It was movod by Mayor Grabak, soconded by Count.Inember Sima, to table thie applicetioo pending review and recosnendation from the Planning CoSMaiesion. Motion* Ayes 5* Maya 0. •1232 BBTt BOlLOnS/CU 60/100 BTiaBS BAT RQA0 nOLIMlHABT 80BDIVIS10II IBBSOSATIQB 12364 ff C. DMNtL ThcMsas Beta end Clement Kroll matter. were present for this City Administrator Bernhardson explained the proposed 5- lot division of 2 parcels. All five lots will be served by e private road. loning Administrator Mabusth noted that on-site testiri lhas confirmed that four lota have adequate area for on- aite aewage treatment aystema (septic testing is not required for one lot because it exceeds i* acres in area). Staff has recoausended an outlet extension be provided to serve the property to the east when it is develc^^. Councllmember Coettan recommended that the fact that the- tennis court ia a non-conforming structure that does not ateet the required setbacks be noted in the resolution. Zoning Administrato* Mabusth stated it would be incorporated in the final subdiviaion resolution. Mr. Kroll noted that his name appeared incorrectly in the drafted resolution. He also questioned the status of the existing tennis court. Zoning Administrator Mabt*^'- explained that the tennis court is a non-conformi , structure which requires variance approval to allow any improvements to the structure. She noted that this would have been the case even without this subdivaion action. Councllmember Callahan asked staff about the best alignment for the outlet extension. &.f- wfym' -3- f m ..y>: iM-w \ lii 4^ I mm■J-:; ■m: WM m:si ms • ' V' . mmmi .V E*; -...- 'V. :'' ;.;S^ Am f :■ •' '■ ■■ XTi m4^75 . .--•’/'• V-■-•:■•. V'UsH vL Vi 4) A 1 i1 ca :> i i K< H I ? 5 5o 2 I i. \ v> 0 44 < 5 <N A :) c4oz w ■% 'jf «i- ti 3 tl 2o » I A) 1. t) /i kL 0 Vi V.A 5 1 i * u 2 P % •^ . .r y- i-^.- ir' wvEye v. .:;y. ^ ^ ^ •■:X;;;::iVyv:, 'V:iiii:' ■: <# ’ ..■ •• fee +,■:■;.£•' ■.,yj • N*' 4 Irt m ‘j iS'ia: " J--.- ; V, i .• •>/ mmm. y]'!* ■ ' IW--^ ■:—. ; ee-::.--; , V*.:-;viv..-.^' - -;-. •.. .. • 4 "A.' '. r ■: r4 >v-;:: : V'y = - •-:i V ' .:N-.. ,ii-i , ,ii^'»Wii:;:?v.-.;vv^:«y-r«Jmm^ m mm M •I . .;• •v^;-; % ■ .••• '- ■■•' ., .'^ e •': y- > Viiiuims or TWi mb^lmi oncno cotSKih, hebtisg nu> nlOaiSC JUMUIIlSTMTQS't WQtfs .4.» 41 lAinr •• ifM•1214 UCaMO> IlNlBaU109S mm MOW bomb ntBLZMlHUIT suwxvigicai KBSOauniO^ •23«3 City ftdaiiilstrator Bcrnhardton •xpisined th« ravited plan which dafinaa tha pavad araa in ralation to tha propoaad dividing lina. \ It wan aovad by Mayor Crabak, aacondad by Councilaapbar Goattan* to adopt Raaolucion #23€3 approving tha praliMlnary ■oMivision. Noticn, Ayas 5» Maya 0. -yv-V^. •1223 JOB nobmi 1951 OOaOOBDlA gTtllf fti 9 tlTIOHAli RXSOLOTUai PBOaT \ ; City Adainiatrator larnhardaon axplainad that Council *^*hiad tha propoaad walkout axcavation cut at their January 11» 19tt naating. Applicant haa subsaquantly •*ii*ittad a taviaad plan showing a 3* da.p f lat-bottomad axcavatiM on tha lakashora yard; and a balcony fron the •Min floor of tha housa* with ratantion of tha axisting deck near tha lakashora bank. Staff racoaiaiandad that tha ravised plan ba sant back to tha Planning CoB«iaaion for review. Ha noted that this plan does not indicate applicant's plan for restoration of tha lakashora bank. John Waldron was present for this isatter and axplainad tha intent to create a more level lakashora yard araa. Ha then axplainad that in trying to aliminata the need for costly retaining wslls* he proposes to repair the lakashora bank by removing 3* o*. the slope where the severe erosion took place and plant tha remaining bank '^ith sumac and day lilies to prevent future erosion. Ha noted that cribbing would involve 500~600 cubic yards of soil disturbance# whereas his proposal would involve approximately 150 cubic yards of soil disturbance. Ha requested Council give some direction regarding th. s proposal before referring it back to the Planning Commission. " ■■■■■■■ mfm mmm Mayor Grabek stated that he needed more information from the City Engineer before he could offer any conceptual approval of the plan. CounciImcmber Goetten concurred with Mayor Grabek noting that grading plans and more Information on soil disturbance arc needed. ifeB’'' ♦ y.-i imtmm tti t ■' immm. 'r"/ .:•; :• '' :/ -VA; ^ ••^\r’ AOl'r v'- ■PP mm ,/mk^ =iiiiii ■ •’^ :;:*'• i^.:‘ ;'V kiSMSi Wfm %:krK'-h •V.^Vv 7.;v^ ?S«;^i:--X-‘':v.:a mimM .:•> J§ Itii Pw :CMlE i£i:l ■■ m 3..^ ’■•’v4J v. •,•^i-•ff - • :. . :%•■:**■1 m%u 5%1 ♦s 1 AH>4.i i %MOT / I * % IL \A K 1 O £ O I 3 3 a t -\ %o < o CL CL ,:'IK-:-: •.■<e -•?.• .••*•, 5.- • .. • ■-. ^■■'. ■'••":■: '■ .• - • ••-, - %■ ■■■■- -fi ■ ■ ■'•*-4'-jm ''silEN^ra ■ .irwi:.-rV'l^:-^^vr#^'.V:'''--;'-V;’iiii I jii^firir'r W ■(■ ■-. v::vvL-,\-;:l Bi8§liS!:-e« ;■-' T • • r* I •K* sS t ? %» % \zo Ql v> td <x 3 VA :W^:.-:..L.L:-v-:V.. :==%{.•■ .'v^ ' • ■ CV,^.-',.;^^ •- ^L. n:m% f ‘''■■y‘..- ■'IP V:;■■ :v.v^ r.'V. •■'■ •;^■y,.r- i t/l 0 I Uj • w . hr l~ PI L>< O -i ':k CL O a. : ;(;. •** •'■ ■•;;.■ V ■ ■ .. :.-vr'4"}t:. ■ ■^IP^■.m . '■: n 7‘-^' ■V'. ■V pM M wmmm •fk-( '^■rv X'!: •4 * « s 3 s-/ T>v.‘-. . ■ = . . .'i/ :■ ^ •'. •.* Hi >’.V: , ■,v:---..r5.;r-.^.3^;--^ , ........ /H v^-:>••>■ ^'^^ *••■ • -r ■.-•■ • :--:vi‘ -.. WkioS [•■■■;••• V'’v - ' - . ;. ■ W^i. ■ , .--f. |r. wm&m. V' ■'.■(f^4 %. ¥<■, mm:MM::wmm»m \a o I I 7o Ca.o i«w ^3!-:M:M':KM^ M\ k • ^. •>-.•->i• ■ =• .. •: f-;. ., ' . T-,? Wm ■r ■■ ii'f M f;m'-’■m-M*kiW i |0 H \ V •5»o . .fc. • ' ■• •'*. *•i«a : • -si'•••■■ ■^ ■ ■ :k< .'•, ■•.- •, ^•■•■:;:;;"/-u:'7: ;^\v. Vrr :•', .•■•::::;;^-;i • i": •: :£mm wm&mm •%'v ".; ■ K'r;- - .1 - mis m ■ ••; ^ - = v:_: V . ■^^ m:m ■ ‘V«; ::>0« l-'Sl :<y:-::i(f:M myy h'y :■''^smm^sm p;h F ^'.. «>■ \ mmsi ¥ i!V^I m {I^ i It 4 3 t >v« 2 Vj a c Zo I %. v:^ -*^v • » 'MIL. (t if ■■■' .4T ■ ^- 4 .. mi^Ik V|■^":V■.-:.v•f>::•• .: ' • • gf:0:^<K';::i,-'S:-.; mmy-m.k:< ■ ■ .■ -.r^ > = .-••. ife'’-Si ilBp: l;->';3">.i. ^ '^v^' •V^"*: •ti'n^- mi- l^K4:m- WSM.'mwxmW&mt' ^ms i^/V;: ;>\ ■ .r- ^mi w- ■ '■■ y 'fl ^::’VttwTr^r-.•.,•■.• •• •. K ir IS■ ...■ •■'■'•■. /•/ •V V :>;>^ X. X. : ', . i1 ‘•A XX ■XXX.:: : : ifWte: "V-)ti ’(■fc:-- •.•>;:r: 'JW^mm :\ • ■•‘^ ■• ’' 0"'^' ivi :*• •■;.■• •••.1 :.•*.;= ■ fr^o: :::U - , vr-.*. i !;, !v mmaV . ’•■ J i -...,v ■='-.^ ‘V-'-'ws^1 !/■' or I a 1 ^ \ \ \\\ \\ '3. ts Ik O S^iwili.‘:.' ■' ;•■ '■•; ;.;■ .T' ’•■ • ■ ' -i -__• .4-' ■■ ; . k-=...V'<r: a <V':. > :■: ,tr ■« tc--';,:;. ;■; X, ■ ''t: ' !1 ■»■ i :#4i ... ; K: : ; :-:v.: Wrnm WMimrm- mid:V. iii:M t’- ••'•x x:xx:, ;=.• •:.X;.j::/X V W' ?^'' ■^A/:\ArU ■^•7, : . / ••; : y A '■•x' ■^■■..■v-'T M-.yy-U \ ;’■;»? itfci V i.x .x.:-.x-x *- x:- .' jm' :'^'w ij '■fiy.::--:yk0j- :•;-V; V »»m ivlf % ■ft. wmi-imMiMi>.-«f ■ IM ■ ■■■' mMLl 5^ ♦i v:-.' .>:•:.« ii„: "%t. V' 1 Btr-vcx^-jT'W mmm:& l*?'y i •••■••'. ; ■• -^ ■•■ ; :' ■ ''.'r •■ C>,:^y.V;; -V" yi'ys-'Ais’-s' •= WM ■- -.iU \ I ' ■^-•■■«■#Vv,. ,,'S^J*-4 :^h'iisn :;:v: mmmim; :; :Ci := • v; • = ®^9S W ••• • '; pmm k:.i \ ■:.■■■■ \ ■■■:. ^r:.- ■4-y ',yyym^ '"'<i•: v: ;-^ ^^-'■s■tej. . ; vi .:^ V-^..- SM wi^m ''. V.-./ :'■ . M Vs LAWntMCI A ALTMAN CAMOt C SMIAPAltO •ANOKA A OlLMUr n over tion of tid­ es will Ian is alcula- port of this lease than .V V .i::4mm U>vV*^; ■■m:..n IHI! 1 f : .vliiii i-' ' ■'• I ; .;. *■■: :•• :■■ ■ ■ ;v-: ,-> . y'I■:■■■■ \ (S, mrnm ¥Prv -ymm f ■; ^ .• ’rv’v/r T, .:vH& r s > r? T smv r^ t CObS $^TTf6 bfN^J center sLSvATio (yAiUCliritS %r Infoui^jf.{ 6X^.STfSC» ^C///C r ^so r '_ \i fisL/ fAS^OSCO COHTO'A^ y'c, 20 ’o'* \ri^Lii^}iLfiH ^SSiCCf^ce nsi COiiCOi^KlM ST,mx&r. M. .•™. .. rv i' < "■••> , •If V--■ f.- •■ • '.■."Ln.’-i-:.-'^': ■ • •■ ;• :■• • .- ^ ; *^';f . ■■ ■ ’c-v" :;•• iiiieiiliR-'^ . '-vv :''.'--:V :■'•";■■ ■ ■ ; ;■ -.:.... ■•'-■, .,' -. ;■ .' •> .■' " V ,'%vv::. V.*/ :^:::- mM0msm f. .^■•'■- ■’ ‘'.s' 'S:'.' -: .J s .w;" ■ ■ v:^‘:C:':S-'SSS.fS''Y-':SS.‘S.i- , '.■■'Y.CW.ySiyS ■fe' :- ■ ':x.K.\ ;• •■ VXi: ;\;;^::r:; .■'■■■■■■• . v- ■ -’V?v : :/' .; ;.s^ .:mx X‘ ' ■■*■■• ■■ .s- /; r-. ■ ;:. ;■ v5! ssfcW r. % >■'"X1 t. v -Ey : ij t;' •4»V^;rA. , V ^ ■E.'.- .‘. '• -V; .■■ ■ ..;. .;.•. .:V;;Eis: " • : . ■ .'I if, Jl- 1 < Colitv. Snimi^ A K ooadci * »HOP *9»OC. •A*<0*i *T LJMV am 4« •»*»«w»TTfr Miiifittrm 1 HwiiKlY* TtvtPiilK iftitJt February 2*# I9tl l.ii>fflll*iCl • Si. evmmk g 9 Micha*! Gaffxcn Assistant Planning and Xonin<3 Administrator City of Orono P.O. Pox 66 Crystal Pay, Minnssota W«-2Be8 55321 Rs: John and Tynn Waldron Property 1951 Concordia Street Dear Michael: As we discussed, I am enclosing herewith copies of the following: 1. Sheet one: site plan/grading plan? 2. Sheet two: section/elevationj 3. Sheet three: site section; and 4. Sheet four: ground level plan. These plans essentially show a three-foot deep excavatioii over a portion of the lake side of the property, with the addition of a balcony over the excavation next to the house. It is antici­ pated that no retaining walls or other unnatural structures will be necessary to remedy the bank erosion problem if this plan is approved. To follow will come a sheet showing hardcover calcula­ tions and a longer letter set^^ing out our argument support o£ this plan. Should you have any questions upon receipt of this letter and its enclosur-s, please give me a call. Also, please call if you feel any other information is necessary other than as enclosed or descri' eu herein. cere ohn B. Waldron Enel. cc: Harlan M. Olson it.imM ^ VV:■mmmm>m:SM "■•'; i j^'-.i» #.'>' proposed removal * s.f. 3d>.a.sr ) s.f } s.f I s.f ► s.f I s.f 14.44 so.ar 8.00 23.15 s.f f sf .457r-j «.r7 *. /Wo , .. . ETopooed t i on caicony59'art - ^ (outside caves) 59.38 s.f ~ 4g.59 s.f mm '• : f- : ' ■■■ , K ..l'- '.i-A---; ••• *<■'■ • • '■. r rW '®r net gala - ^3i?9 s.f /^.S t V >9.» - .. \ *,-<C«'>C * 13.79- 25 T* ■ 19.9* new hardcover y percentage •9 - 19.67 « .23* percentage X hardcover increase : / i7/V^ ■ /. 7/ /o '/ c <^*SC Pir'S- K. r /W^<^ \-tO • ^:r ;:'S^as»s:’ ^ /• /^ ^ I r*P. \ cvt «^-i L- K '.J • ;--.o*V.v ••.>:;• 11#' ■;■ -;</=•• 7 V r • ■••V. .Tvrm L W; ■ ^ mM ■ f Kii March 2, 198S paga 6 serial Increaaa In for aasiar 3n of lakashora hanks ths quality and isult of ths Avsrsely affect the a no view cts, and doss not raphy since a gradual rty to the Gempler he need to install alls or stabilization two of which would and significantly he lake during antially Identical to he walkout for the lair project involved ved no real hardship replaced without iving area was not a if the Sinclair grading ne whereas ours takes I it can be shovm thi.t :o the lake. The ithetic impact as well. of stabilization Led retaining wall Id, as a practical : them. Therefore, we tsent one. ' Kxistiftg W4rdcov«»r f9>7S*| ^«ps to lake Muse <li.l X 46.1)'’"** «**ck <14*2-l/2* a fU-) ^^•t. half circle (J.14 * ---------------- u m. *11 existing hardcover percentage s.f ftzi.ii sf t • ^•■44 s.f. ap.ar* ••00 s.f, 7*.7t a.f. •34.41 s.f. s.f. 43.2« s.f. proposed reiSQval 14.44 IdLXr 8.00 23.15 *y;s* ..r '1,‘to if. ,/tr.^v .1 •"“1.';' -..u- > i£*‘op^-»atri iJctltlon ~Mnnr.fSists. r * i ,4 A ?*-*r * ?“* - 7S5t14*5 X !§• X 2 ■■594 S&50 ♦ 144 • S9.38 59.31 s.f. I«r4anr,r n*t g.U ^ IT t I lij.' tr /^.S 1104.6 ♦ 13.79. --------T* • 15-9% new hardcover percentage * ■■ ■■■•■7' ••, r ■, .#ra ‘.c 19‘9 " 39.67 • .23% percentage hardcover increase - •. . ui*/ f*T4 /o» i4 C4#Alf RI L •" -v :: ■ •• J A*::> hr n 7:' ' iilli 1 irm-A £>r ’<^*r rcf-c. n*t F.C'*cc, . * /e.iW ^ • ■ ■■ ■, ' .-t,- ■:■•; ■V' 77 ..•.7-' s:;V I!l9|j|^pjphasspF ■■■-. ■'*'"•7t/sli W0AAAA,.^.a >\1:7 'i; , '••^:7^:7•.7• ;7. •■■ ;■ AAIM•^liiiis wm^mm ■'irVs * ’f- ■' "Kaircb 2, 19ii pag« S lid protect the slope froa ?est top portion of the balance. As stated in ition ... will be promoted. )n and alteration." We reline. However, if the of the land within 75* of this "shoreline" has igh erosion and that our alleviating any future i states that "Natural reserved insofar as rard surface runoff and rs this objective as well. t natural views, vegetationi Lts...." By avoiding ral views and vegetation Lt in accord with this by stating that "Natural Eind retaining walls will be Bsary to prevent nnepin Conservation baslze that retaining walls ased by groundwater here. Retaining walls are drainage problems." The p to be revegetawcd. It is ope with plants having long ns such as sumac and day oposal would have an fety. or welfare. On the slope where it is fety of the slope for n of the neighborhood, as may be on our property. nt by the ordinance is the 1 will only have a positive the storm damage in an y will enhance the e Increase its market value could be made regarding Hr. Hichasl Gaffr«i Rei and Lynn Waldron ProfwrtyIfSl Concordia Straet 1. There will be no significant or hardcover; March a. 19tt page § material iiwreass in 3* Laksshore banks will bs at a grads for sasier malntenanes and tbs potential for erosion of lakeshore banks will be decreased} 3. There will be tso adverse iapact on the quality and quantity of rux»ff into the lake as a result of thsi pxo^pommlt 4. The proposed alteraticm does not adversely affect the neighboring properties since it presents no view encroachments, no adverse drainage effects, and does not materially change the surrounding topogra^y since a gradual rise in elevation from the Begets property to the Ceepler property will bs maintained; and 5. The proposed plan will alleviate the need to install less aesthetically pleasing retaining walls or stabilization fabric or cribwall syatams. the latter two of which would involve significantly more earth moving and significantly greater possibility of degradation to the lake durii^ construction and afterwards. These findings and conditions are substantially identical to those found by the City in its approval of the walkout for the William Sinclair property in 1943. The Sinclair project involved removing three tiMS as such earth and involved no real hardship since the foundation could have easily been replaced without creating a walkout. Desire for additional living area was not a hardship either. Also, the fact that most of the Sinclair grading took place at least 40 feet froa the shoreline whereas ours takes place within 50 feet is insignificant unless it can be sho%m that our excavation would result in degradation to the lake. The Sinclair project had a such more obvious aesthetic impact as well. See enclosed photograph. Finally, we have investigated the cost of s.abilization fabric, cribwall. retaining walls and modified retaining wall systems. All are prohibitively expensive and. as a practical matter, we therefore simply cannot implement them. Therefore, we see no other options open to us than the present one. JBWtcy Enclosures dron March 2, 2980 paga 4 luch closer to the lake it or below the lakeehore By contrast, we are >p of the slope and, with luring construction, no the other two proposals radation of the lake further, the City Lon fabric method has not ibject to rot over time. :o be as permanent as the Ls would not have this I less aesthetically kries of retaining walls Dorhood than the ground aasurements indicate that nches lower than the endowed photographs n the lakeshore outside a low just north of the high point at the to the left of the the stairs, a black rea of earth which would set is a yardstick which e purposes. Thus, if our ke, one can see by the north of our the south thereof, that n of the gradual upward y to the Gempler II keep our property in ring residences. rather than regraded nable. If the proposal reates an aesthetically hat rational objection wed much more significant he James Hoff property in ty notes it has allowed irious erosion problems. lid be in complete •ono's Community isal would retain natural soil er<Mion ■■■iiMr. Michael Gaffrom Ret John anl Lynn wmlAron Frqparty I9SI CtOKQrtlia street:Kerch I, Ifit page S vegetation on the lekeeide slope end would protect the slope fron further eroeion by taking away the ateepeet top portion of the al^e end allowing tta to revegetate the balance. As stated in C.M.P. 4**f, *Retention of natural vegetation ... will be proaoted. Shorelines will be protected frwi eroeion end elteratlMi." We sttbmit that «« are not altering the shoreline. However, if the •shoreline” is deemed to be any portion of the land within 75* of the lake, tiMn it is our position that this *shoreline* has already been significantly altered through erosion and that our proposal is the beet practical naans of alleviating any future eroeion or alteration. C.M.P. 4*13 also states that "Natural vegetation in shorelend areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reaemukble in order to retard surface runoff and • see Our pr^^oeel furthers this objective as well. C.M.P. 4-15 states that "Preservation of natural views, vegetation always produces K>re aesthetic results....” By avoiding retaining wells, we are preserving natural views and vegetation end are producing a more aesthetic result in accord with this goal. C.M.P. 4-19 echoes this thought by stating that "Natural vegetaticm will be preserved on slopes and retaining walls will be discouraged except trhen absolutely necessary to prevent erosion....” As James Piegat of the Hennepin Conservation District has stated, ”We cannot overemphasise that retaining walls do not solve slope pr^lMs that are caused by groundwater conditions similar to those encountered here. Retaining walls are Q solution to lazHlscaping problems, not drainage problems." The top of the slope at present is too steep to be revegete.ed. It is our plan to revegetate the remaining slope with plants having long tap roots and otherwise good root systems such as sumac and day lilies. We know of no argument that our proposal would have an adverse effect on the public health, safety, or welfare. On the contrary, by reducing the height of the slope where it is accessible, tre will be enhancing the safety of the slope for ourselves, our children and the children of the neighborhood, as well as other members of the public who may be on our property. The other criterion deemed important by the ordinance is the effect on property values. Our proposal will only have a positive effect on property values by remedying th*. storm damage in an aesthetically pleasing way. The balcony will enhance the usefulness of the property and therefore increase its market value also. In summary, the following findings could be made regarding our proposal: KlfSti .a■■■: V.uv . • HMarch 2, I9i8 pag« 3 las no r.agatlv* affects beyond either end of the ict any natural areas Id froB the lake or 'oaaisslon previously :k. The only difference »elng much smaller, Is ited, the only Issue that iutas a view obstruction iclosed plate shows, the within the average deck itltute a view mers. In any 1 joining property o%mers I Is thick vegetation on ts their view through to Irenes between our t is that there is not a growth of soil- ;rround level decks. The indlng properties since a substantial wooden ■ the back door of their for recommending denial Lcony is necessary to bhe house and for n our proposed reduction osal, we have already as good as the others point of view. In other on the quality or riterion is probably the ng whether a given City's objective of by the Clwy is whether a truslve method of City Engineer has e removed from the site 00 cubic yards. We would hand, our engineer has e moved for a tern would be c yards for a cribwall urrently on file. In reed slope system and the >Mr. Michael Caffnmi Bst John and Lynn Waldron Property IfSl Concordia Street March a, 19tSpage^ €cribwall syst« would involve excavation much clooer to the lake eimoo the work would have to start right at or below the lakeshore level in order to MMrure a proper systMi. by contrast, we are removing only throe feet of soil at the top of the slcgto and, with pr<M^r balsa and other barriers in place during construction, no further silt should reach the lake, with the other two propmals for stabilisatiiHi fabric or 'Tibwall, degradatlOT of the lake during construction would be avoidable, further, the City Engineer has a<baltted that the stabilisatiwi fabric method has not been tlM-proven and that crlbwalls are aubjeot to rot over time, thus, neither of these methods can claim vo be ee permanent as the excavation we propose■ Of course, e eeriee of retaining wells irould not have this disedventege elthou^ they would prMient e lees eeethetieelly pleasing view froa the lake. Surely, a aeriae of retaining walls is much lees in conformity with the neighborhood then the ground excavation which we ere proposing. Our sMesurementa indicata that the Regetx proiMrty is e^roximetely 29 inches lower then the lakeside portion of our property. As the enclosed photographs indicata, the ganaral alopa of the land on the lakaahora outside of the hesMS in our neighborhood reaches s low just north of the Ragats property er^ climbs gradually to a high point at the Ceaipler property. The photographs show, tu the left of the stairs, e black line end, to the right of the stairs, e black plastic sheet, both of which depict the area of earth which would be removed. To the right of the black sheet is e yardstick which wee inserted for measurement end reference purposes. Thus, if our proposed excavation is viewed from the lake, one can aaa by comparing it with tha land iiWKliataly to tha north of our axisting dack and tha land immadiataly to tha aouth tharaof, that it will maraly appear to ba a continuation of the gradual upward alope of tha land from tha Ragatz proparty to the Gemplar property. Thus, our excavation would still keep our proparty in character end conformity with the neighboring reaidences. The feet that earth will ba removed rather than regraded under our proposal should not be objectionable. If the proposal doss not harm tha laka or lakeshora and craataa an aasthatically plaaaing raault, it is difficult to aaa what rational objaction there could be. Again, tha City has allowed much more significant removal of earth in the 0-7S' area with the James Hoff property in 1985. In allowing that regrading, tha City notee it has allowed regrading of lakeshore lots becausa of serious erosion problems. Such is exactly the situation hsre. Further, our proposed excavation would ba in complete accordanca with tha goals sat forth in Orono's Community Management Plan. Specifically, our proposal would retain natural ii»i M: •** ’• ■ T..-* 4 mmmm mm ymrm . \. .. .r-.Ay «MW ..-Karch 2, S98i pag« 2 kd argxmant that our :y or quantity of runoff )tad In your Dacaober 9 .1 do%m to ona of la with tha City's ist be protectad, as a /hlch tha City aaaks to rationally ralatad to in ba succassfully , our proposal should ba tad by tha ordinances and Lnad critically as to la objective of preserving Ls the issue of hardcover, ndicate, the proposed increase in tha 0-75* tit increase in hardccn^er Bs than half of tha Y tha Council at its ck Swenson property, adI there is a serious trictions in tha City's to the City's objectives balcony is considered ordinance, hardcover is tarferes to any degree nto the ground. I assuae nt to have the purpose of structures are not placed ntity of runoff and the re sediment more quickly such as a balcony, which lly have a beneficial f and increasing its ito the lake. We submit, I one we are proposing t not an unbroken flat rould have the undesired I boards, between which the of the deck also has the rainfall which would :hat there is no scientific my would have a negative loff flowing to the lake, I hardcover restriction in m. iir. fiichael Geffr«iJohn end Lynn Waldron Froperty iiSi Concordia Street Karch 2, ittt pege J Aeetheticelly, our proposed balcony has no negative effects either. First of ell, it does not extend beyond either end of the hwse. In other words, it does net obstruct any natural areas which are presently uiwbetructed, as viewed free the lake or either adjoining property. The Planning Coaeiseion previously recoeawnded approval of a ground level teek. TIm only difference with our proposed balcony is, aside free being mich smaller, is that it has a railing, hs you have indicted, the only issue that the railing presents is idiether it constitutes a view obstruction free either adjoining property, km the enclosed plate shows, the proposed balcony will fit almost entirely within the average deck setback area, ks such, it should not constitute e view ez^roechment for the adjoining property ewnera. In any event, during tha time of year when the adjoining pr^ierty owners would be using their lakeside yards, there is thick vegetation on either side of our property which obstructs their view through to «Hir property anyway. The «»ly other difference between our balcony and a ground level balcony or deck is that there is not the ebeence of sunlight trhich prevents the growth of soil- retaining vegetation aa is the case with ground level decks. Tha balcony is alao in keeping with the surrounding properties since both pr^ksrtiea on either side of us have e substantiel wooden planked area extending for e distance fr«i the beck door of their houses. Thus, there is no rational beeie for recommending denial ot the balcony itself. Of course, the balcony is necessary to provide e means of exit fr« the rear of the house and for meintenence of the rear of the house given our proposed reduction in elevation of the lakeside yard. In analyzing the balance of our proposal, we have already pointed out that the proposal is at least as good aa tha othara propoaed by the City from an engineering point of view. In other %rords, it will not have a negative effect on the quality or quantity of runoff into the lake. This criterion is probably the *o*t significant one to examine in deciding whether a given restriction is rationally related to the City's objective of preserving the lake and lakeshore. One of the other concerns expressed by the city is whether a proposal such as this one is the least intrusive method of resolving the bank erosion problem. The City Engineer has eetimated that the quantity of earth to be removed from the site as a result of our proposed plan is 150-200 cubic yards. We would not dispute this estimate. On the other hand, our engineer has estizkated that the quantity of earth to be moved for a stabilization fabric reinforced slope system would be approximately 500 cubic yards or 600 cubic yards for a cribwall system. See Service Engineering letter currently on file. In addition, the stabilization fabric reinforced slope system and tho mmm .:h■-■ V :': : "v-•j'r ;^r^‘= : ■• •/.: .. -.V/VJ-.:;-;-v:.->v7 ■ ■ -: :■ ■:.■ A.■■ • ■ - V":.;fglMS-.‘Il'TwR-seeB tor nts In support of th« most bank erosion problem created an see from the sheets , we are no longer proposing a regrading of the of the yard three feet over he severe erosion occurred, ashore slope at its crest, the Hennepin Consexvatlon urn of August 14, 1987, a f Report of December 9, to maintain that the July 23 ip on our property within n other words, our plight is perty and not created by us. suffered bank erosion he unique character of the the fact that the situation locality. ng Commission recommending t the walkout cut was not ion needs. Our present is one of the he Hennepin Conservation roblem such as this. 8 stated that our present g standpoint with the other uggested by the City mmmm ECk; Vi •: rm^ ftiT- ■ . C. „■>: ■ ■ h If •V.'c=^' ;:.:-r Km'/' • . ■ •■■ '■ '■%•K‘m. mehael caffrcn Re: John and Lynn Waldron Property1951 ccHkcordia Street March 2, 198S page aEngineer. As such, there appeere to be no argument that our propoeel will adversely affect the quality or quantity of runoff into thm lake. Thue, as you correctly noted in your DecMber 9 Staff report, *The problem appears to boil <town to one of ^iloeopby.* While I understand and agree with the City's philoeo^y that the lake and lakeehore must be protected, as a practical matter, the specific means by which the City seeks to "protect* the lake and lakeehore must be rationally related to that ^jective. If they are not, they can be successfully attacked in a oosixt, of law. As a result, our prt^Msal should be analysed in terms of the criteria suggests by the ordinances and those criteria themselves should be examined critically as to whether they are rationally related to the objective of preserving and protecting t)M lake and lakeshore. One potential issue in this regard is the issue of hardcover. As mix enclosed hardcover calculations indicate, the proposed balcony will result in a .23% hardcover increase in the 0*‘79* tone. It is our positi<m that this slight Increase in hardcover is insignificant. Por example, it is less than half of the percentage hardcover increase escrowed by the Council at its August 24 meeting with respect to the Jack Swenson property. Moreover, ee the staff Itself has edmitted, there is s serious question as to whether the hardcover restrictions in the City's ordinences are really rationally related to the City's objectives of protecting the lake end lakeehore. A balcony is considered hardcover since, in the language of the ordinance, hardcovar ia any structura or othar matarial which intarfaras to any dagrae with the direct abeorpticm of rainfall into tha ground. I aasume that tha hardcover reetrictione were meant to hava the purpose of preserving the lake by making sura that structuras ara not placad does to tha laka which incraasa tha quantity of runoff and tha spaed of runoff, thereby transporting mora sadimant more quickly to the lake. However, some structures, such as a balcony, which are, by definition, hardcover, can actually hava a beneficial affect by slowing down ralnfell or runoff and Incraaaing its chancas for absorption before running into the lake. We submit, that, if anything, a balcony such as tha ona wa are proposing actually haa e beneficiel effect. It is not an unbroken flat Btirface such as a concrata patio which would hava the undesired effect, but rether is e series of spaced boards, between which the rainfall falls to the ground. The wood of the deck also has the effect of absorbing a certain amount of rainfall which would otherwis'' reach the ground. We submit that thara is no sclantific proof whataoaver that our proposed balcony would have a negativa impact on tha quality or quantity of runoff flowing to tha lake, which is the only rational basis for tha hardcover restriction in the first place. '. f. vironmental impacts are onslder this application i the character of the :ainly has a hardship to k is necessary to restore LI must determine whether method proposed to allow e lakeside of the houses he existing grade, which would appear to be no rties' views of the lake, for the encroachment in aid need a railing. The I proposed deck would be :he lakeshore remains in le would be approximately isly recommended approval :o removal of the deck at SiKi .... -a'-s. i to remove the lakeshore B that the foundation of some added stability, roslon did not occur (the glneer Glenn Cook feels )f the pojts and the fact :, but the decking itself and Council are left to structure outweigh the increase of 0.64% if the onable value) is removed), the deck was removed. mum i-m -4 mi m I? - ■ ■V - .v^ V. : . sgarding decks not being I before but have never W^ ,. \ -rv-r umu- ■ ■ 'Ui mm \a,m■m ■•"■!'■ «3i'^'0 r, fi -fe^■ •: ■ •.- •■•• ■....' -r;:mm -mm mm mmm: r-mmmi -» •Cm~ta\, STH«TS?i &Arro—St*# ft? Lmm 9ajtr9 M». #09 jjiiwrjyrry AiftkiMM mm H5Wm -3B® Ksrai i, llfi Nichasl Caffron Assistant Plannlisg ft lonlng Administrator City of Orcmu} P.O. Box 6€ Crystal Bay, Minnesota 5S323 Rs: John and Lynn Waldron Property 19S1 Concordia Street Dear Michaelt This letter asts forth our arguments in sufqport of the Mst recent proposal of ours to remedy the bank erosion problem created by the July 23, 19S7, storm. As you can see frcmi the sheets exKlosed with my letter of Psbruary 29, we are no longer proposing a walkout cut but rather are proposing a regrading of the lakeshore yard to reduce the elevation of the yard three feet over the area in front of the house «d\ere the severe erosion occurred. Thus, we would be cutting back the lakeshore slope at its crest, which is one of the recosmmndations of the Hennepin Conservation Diatrict as outlined in their Nemorandiui of August 14, 19S7, a copy of which was attached to the staff Report of December 9, 19S7. First, and foremost, we continue to maintain that the July 23 storm created a severe physical hardship on our property within the meaning of the city ordinances. In other words, our plight is due to circumstances uniqpie to our property and not created by us. Although ether properties on the lake suffered bank erosion problems, this fact does not destroy the unique character of the occurrence. The uniqueness stems from the fact that the situation is not one generally prevailing in the locality. One of the reasons for the Planning Commission recommending denial of our walkout proposal was that the walkout cut was not related to the bank erosion stabilization needs. Our present proposal is clearly related in that it is one of the recommendations specifically made by the Hennepin Conservation District to deal with a bank erosion problem such as this. As you know, the City Engineer has stated that our present proposal is neutral from «m engineering standpoint with the other proposed methods of bank restoration suggested by the City mm^m : rt tS. . ise the area of relatively ill rather than allow swift City's philosophy has been zones for increasing the t is significant that the t the ground was saturated led the bank to shear. The 1 that he reduce the anount b into the ground by piping easing the chance for a en that the erosion that act on lake water quality# a normal run-off from the : would seem that we might Lfications of our current this one. lake water quality impact 8 not significantly better because the impacts can be control methods during the er quality standpointr once significant impact on the IS. , the proposed method will in if the bank was merely ay not be as stable as It tural stabilizer (such as the revised proposal will ieep walk-out cut proposal, jss distinct from across the Bed, and depending on the be relatively unobtrusive Ls. \v V % /'.-■•--■■.A 'Afv^*'nmi;;S• V . . • : • • mrnm m:. c : m (■tr '"'“H•■•'V =.V mSoning File «1|2J Karch t, 193Q Page • of • As we have stated before, given that the environmental impacts arm neutral. Council and Planning Cowissien should cxwisider this application based on the visual impact of the project on the character of the neighborhood, remembering that the applicant certainly has a hardship to the property in that soaw degree of excavation work is necessary to restore the lakeshore bank. Planning Commission and Council must determine whether or not it is appropriate based on the restoratim MtlKid proposed to allow additional excavation all the way to the house. Xegardiag the related Issue of e deck on the lakeside of tha house, applicant proposes s 5'x29' deck area located at the exieting grade, which would be 3* above the proposed grade. There would appear to be no significant viaw ancroachment on neighboring properties' views of the lake, howevsr a variance would technically be requircKl for the encroachment in the average lakeshore setback, since the deck would need e railing. The increase in hardcover in the 0-75' tone with this proposed deck would be 19.959 existing to 21.)(t, if the deck near the lakeshore remains In place. The net hardcover Increase In the 0-75* rone would be approximately ^9 s.f. or about 1.41%. Planning Commission previously recommended approval of a ground-level deck for the property, subject to removal of the deck at the lakeshore. Staff would note that applicant does not wish to remove the lakeshore deck because it is still functional, and suggests that the foundation of that deck structure gives the existing bank some added stability, considering that this is one of two areas where erosion did not occur (the other is under the stairway structure). City Engineer Gisnn Cook faela that the stability ij| enchanced due to the depth of the po..ts and the fact that they are structurally tied together as a unit, but the decking itself may be of little consequence. Planning Commission and Council are left to determine whether the advantages of the deck structure outweigh the effects of the hardcover increase of 1.41% (or increase of 0.64% if the deck stays but the concrete half-circle (of questionable value) is removed) Applicant's grading plan would change slightly if the deck was removed. The point applicant makes In his letter regarding decks not being valid hardcover is a concept we have reviewed before but have never accepted for various reasons. ip ' i.- . '/-‘v ■ ^ msmm • V.-.. • -v' ■ • . lO' - '"v.a h ; '\yyZ: rV::-A-m.00i®; ^ ■0. . ’ ■** V* • s* ••• . OP OPTIONStabllsh a relative impact for Lng Proper Erosion tity and quality) r Impact 2 5ff Water Quantity & Quality Lons, based on amount of flat [mental lion controls arc not in *6S a ' :K- '.'.Vtoning Pile #1223 Kerch •, !#••Page 7 of t D) To whet degree does the project decrcese the eree of relatively level ground surface that will absorb rainfall rather than allow swift run-off? Staff would note that while the City's philosophy has been to nasiaize the flat area in lakeshore zones for increasing the absorption of rainfall and snow aelt« it is significant that the reason the current erosion ot'cured was that the ground was saturated and the weight of the saturated earth caused the bank to shear. The Watershed District suggested to Mr. Waldron that he reduce the Mount of water froa the property that would absorb into the ground by piping it directly to the lake, thereby decreasing the chance for m recurrence of the ground saturation. Given that the erosion that occurred had a significant dctriaental impact on lake water guality. (arguably a nuch greater inpact than the nornal run-off from the surface over a large nunber of years), it would seen that we night need to redefine and reconsider the ramifications of our current philosophy as it impacts properties such as this one. Sunnary - A. Prom a short-term environmental and lake water quality impact standpoint, applicant's revised proposal is not significantly better or worse than most of the methods proposed, because the impacts can be minimized through the use of proper erosion control methods during the grading and revegetation process. B. From a long term environmental lake water quality standpoint, once the area is revegetated th«.re will be no significant impact on the lake water quality relative to other options. C. From the standpoint of slope stability, the proposed method will make the slope somewhat more stable than if the bank was merely regraded to its original contours, but may not be as stable as it could be if some type of interior structural stabiliser (such as cribbing or fabric layering) were employed. D. From the standpoint of visual impact, the revised proposal will have less of an Impact than the original deep walk-out cut proposal. Topographically, a 3' cut will likely l>e less distinct from across the lake than the 6-8' cut originally proposed, and depending on the degree of vegetation established, could be relatively unobtrusive compared to methods that use retaining walls. ■ ' ■ ■ y . * •• • ■ ■-* ^ % ■ ^ V.. • •• I ■ ; > •■y • W-y-"’y ,••■■■■ •' . -I. .-J mu ■ ..............................' , :y.;. ^--.vyr * ■■■ • -v- - A.;:;y. .•>' .. V 'V; : V: : ■ T.- ■■■■ . ;••••: I ■; ■ m \ ■ ” V, ’ • ‘. -i;. A ;y ; :• . y '■ ■■■■*' ir^it %MmM gjiAiiTiTATivr or wriows(These are VtRTI subjective, but help to estsbiish e reletive toreach option.)rectors hmd Helative Vaises h Visual Ispact trow Late (Loo<^-Ter») B OPTION A B C D E F G H I Least Intermediate No«tPinal Bank Stability Ck>odl~r Not as Good Poor Short-Term Enviromaenta 1 Isipact Uaine Proper Erosion- Control Methods (Punoff water quantity and quality) Minor Impact 6 —r~Walor Impact Lonq-Term Environmental Impact-tunofC liater Quantity a Quality (Relative as coeqwired to other options, baaed on amount of flat abecrbticn area maintained) Beneficial6 Neutral Detrimental 1 2 Poteniial Short-Term impact if erosion controls ar© not in place This is baaed on two factorai B-1 Relative amount of dirt moved around on slope area Little Mediuin Large Amount 0 1 / B-2 Relative amount of total disturbed surface area (e.f.) Low Medium fllah 0 1 B-3 Duration of wcr)i Shortest time Medium Longest time T A 0 0 0 2 1 1.5 1 PACTORS B C .5 . ^;> 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 7 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 ] D 1 TOTAL ^B.C.D B-1 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 4 3 3 3 4 3.5 4 3.5 . 5 1 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 3 -1-f sed at length, because nt's useable lakeshore impact because it would The option involves a •sired slope, and would d. It would seem that e practical use of the character with the rally accomplishes the lity effects would not the other methods but rptlon area of lawn to proposed and suggests e slope would allow the grade. Similar walls in question. Stability here would be a fairly The visual impact from the exposed face and of ling. 3 the concerns of short- well as the permanent lese questions: visible change in the bank relative to the rm impact on lake water iderway and during the regetation on the site? Le with erosion control or the bank on a long ijor erosion will be to create a 6-8* deep he desired 2:1 slopes uld decrease the weight that occurred in 1987. 1 Impact from the lake srosion potential would area exposed with no i, the long term impact ind no worse than the ry environmental impact creating an unnatural iform lakeshore bank in ubmitted by applicant, jnitude of the original It suggests excavation » a depth of 3* below sser slope down to the for surface erosion is 3und will be disturbed The visual impact from iginal proposal, as can jgest that you compare plish the same purpose, the stability may be uphill from the slope, it less obtrusive given ,n this case it is the aining wall) from the ^ /S ^11 \Zoning File #1223 March 8, 1988 Page 6 of 8 H. This option has not been previously discussed at length, because it involves a severe reduction of the applicant’s useable lakeshore yard area, and %rould have a potential negative impact because it would not blend into the adjacent properties well. The option involves a total regrading of the slope to meet the 2:1 desired slope, and would involve tamoval of a large portion of the yard. It would seem that this approach would have a severe isipact on the practical use of the applicant's property and would not be in character with the neighboring properties, even though it technically accomplishes the desired stable slope. The long- term lake quality effects would not be significantly better or worse than most of the other methods but note that the method would reduce the flat absorption area of lawn to a degree. I. This is another option that has not been proposed and suggests that a retaining wall located at the base of the slope would allow the filling behind it to approximate the original grade. Similar walls originally in place on the lakeshore bank in question. Stability of such a method is questionable given that there would be a fairly large bulk of disturbed soils placed above it. The visual impact from the lake would again depend on the height of the exposed face and of the vegetation able to be established as screening. In attempting to assign a quantitative value to the concerns of short­ term and long-term impact on lake water quality as well as the permanent visual impact of the various options, staff asked these questions: A) Does the method result in a significant visible change in the topography and character of the lakeshore bank relative to the neighboring properties? B) Is there a significant detrimental short term impact on lake water quality during the time the excavation is underway and during the period of time prior to reestablishment of revegetation on the site? Is this short term potential impact controllable with erosion control methods so as to minimize the short term impact? C) Does the method provide adequate stability for the bank on a long term basis, so that future occurrences of major erosion will be minimized or eliminated? L .. elope area, build a len refill the bank to ng becomes invisible B steeper slope to be n order to construct lasted and stock piled cern. There would be -vegetation period as expensive due to the low for a relatively rade. system results in a f parallel horizontal :al fabric, which acts soil. The amount of ong-term effects are , as are the greater ng wall system, with planting of landscape a major visual impact installations on the :reened so as to be ;tion and design, this lity. The potential I would be relatively ht retaining wall at e slope from the base omewhat flatter than s option would be to 0 that the slope fr n 3 desired. Obviously, ter the visual impact ^ases as the height of 1 long-term effects on 3ns B and C. ••• Zoning File 11223 March 8, 1988 Page :> of 8 P. This is the applicant's original proposal to create a 6-i* deep excavation, which would allow for the desired 2il slopes along the tajor portion of the lakeshore and would decrease the weight of soil tending to cause the slumping effect that occurred in 1987. Ho%rever, with the deep cut proposed, the visual isipact from the lake would be significant. The short term surface erosion potential would be relatively high due to the large surface area exposed with no vegetation. Once the re-vegetation is complete, the long term impact on lake water quality would be no better and no worse than the BMjority of methods proposed. Again, the pris>ary environmental impact of this option would be the visual impact of creating an unnatural topography along what exists as a relatively uniform lakeshore bank in the neighborhood, as is shown on the photos submitted by applicant. The copies of that photo show the relative magnitude of the original and revised proposals. G. This is the applicant's revised proposal that suggests excavation of about half of the lakeshore lawn area to a depth of 3* below existing surface, which would then allow a lessei slope down to the lake. Again, the short-term potential impact for surface erosion is somewhat greater because a greater area of ground will be disturbed and remain unvegetated for a period of time.^ The visual impact from the lake will be not nearly as severe as the original proposal, as can be compared using the two photos. I would suggest that you compare Option G with Option E. Essentially they accomplish the same purpose, with the advantages of Option G being that the stability may be enhanced slightly due to 3' less of overburden uphill from the slope, and the visual impact of Option G may be somewhat less obtrusive given the additional distance of the wall face (in this case it is the basement fo>ndation wall rather than a retaining wall) from the shoreline. in.’4f ? ‘ - r r ' Ai '/fj / r 71 A.*• 1 r . ' ! « Lm ^ mm '^'1 'Ai- W: IHi ■ , tisi. :al drop for every te for stabilizing a continuous 2*1 tployed to provide two categories: ty so that steeper tendency to fail. as retaining walls, urden soil so that >yed. of the soil to move red by staff is as orm slope with no out a 1.4:1 slope better than what be disturbed soil rhis method would te, but would be f vegetation. The ould be relatively 5 prime short term be laid bare for a Note that use of bales, seed mesh, actual short-term 4%••Vi va‘:VZoning Pile 11221 March I, 1988 Page 4 of I B. This method proposes to excavate the bank slope area, build a cribbed interior stabilisation structure and then refill the bank to the original (1.4:1) grade. The interior cribbing bec<»es invisible because it is covered with sol), hence allows the steeper slope to be naintained while making it much more stable. In order to construct the cribbing, a large askount of soil must be excavated and stock piled on the site, but this is merely a short-term concern. There xrould be slightly greater area of bare soil during the re-vegetation period as compared to Option A. This auithod is relatively expensive due to the materials and excavation involved, but would allow for a relatively stable restoration of the approximate original grade. C. Layered fabric stabilisation system. This system results in a slope similar to Option B, but involves the use of parallel horizontal layers of soil backfill separated by a geotechnical fabric, which acts to greatly reduce the vertical mass movesient of soil. The amount of excavation needed and both the short-term and long-term effects are very similar to those of the cribbing method, as are tho greater expenses involves. D. This method nalces use of a total retaining wall system, with nearly vertical faces and nearly level beds for planting of landscape and screening siaterials. This system would have a major visual impact from the lake, and the track record of similar installations on the lakeshore has shown that they are rarely screened so as to be unobtrusive. Depending on the method of construction and design, this system would have fair to good long term stability. The potential short-term effects of erosion due to bare ground would be relatively minimal as compared to other methods. E. This system makes use of a single 3-4* height retaining wall at the edge of the flat lawn area, which allows the slope from the base of the retaining wall to the lakeshore to be somewhat flatter than Options A through C. Another version of this option would be to construct a retaining wall of a greater height so that the slope fr n its base to the lake would meet the 2:1 standard desired. Obviously, the greater the height of such a wall, the greater the visual impact it will have from the lake. Stability also decreases as the height of such a wall becomes greater. The short-term and long-term effects on lake water quality are similar to those of Options B and C. i; -rV.- applicant asked the City to n light of what seems to be In fact, on at least one 1 approved a cut to create a originally proposed. A photo operty indicates that such a letracting from the natural Bts that a 3’ deep excavation /e a beneficial effect on the to other methods. Staff has d quantify the valid public ject. To this end, staff has to assess the visual and :oration methods available for t assessment process. i? Certainly, environmental onmental Plan section of the Sts that the visual impact of other properties is a valid for lake water quality. The lot necessarily a valid public rn if such a project that has lOt be feasibily completed due f owner. I am not sugges^'ing •ation, but am suggesting chat lowner into the most expensive ids are available that will ods for restoration of the 'e been discussed to a certain I, and each of which has both perty owner and the public in principals that apply to each tolling File 11223 March 6, 19tt Page 1 of • A) In general, a 2il slopo (50% slop* or 1’ vertical drop for every 2' of horiiontal distance) is considered as adequate for stabilising the slope in the clayey soil types present. B) If site factors make it unfeasible to create a continuous 2tl elope, then artificial structuel methods must be employed to provide adequate stability. These would appear to fall into two catagoriesx 1. Providing the bank with interior stability so that steeper slopes can be created that wi 11 have less of a tendency to fail. OR 2. Providing exterior vertical support, such as retaining walls, that will allow the removal of excess overburden soil so that shorter lengths of flatter slopes can be employed. In either case the goal is to decrease the ability of the soil to move sideways as a result of forces from abov.< it. A brief description of the nine options considered by staff is as follows: A. Backfill and grade the existing bank to a uniform slope with no stabilization measures. This would result in about a 1.4:1 slope which would have stability characteristica no better than what originally existed, if not worse because there would be disturbed soil in place of what was natural soil originally. This method would likely have little visual impact from the lake, but would be relatively troublesome for the re-establishment of vegetation. The short term potential impacts on lake water quality would be relatively low compared to other methods, pr'»'uming that the prime short term concern is the area of vegetated surface that will be laid bare for a period of time and subject to surface erosion. Note that use of proper erosion control methods (silt fence, hay bales, seed mesh, etc.) with each of the nine options will make the actual short-term impact relatively equal for all the options. mm..Tj.-i'--’/" ; Vl-f-: r. ■ iv - ' ^:m. ■r ■ *'■■? f ■":;?■■'■ ti'.■;4^'^ ■ ■ ■.:■* „:..J^--«IMi.lyB g & Zoning Administrator cordla Street - • — Referral Back Front Council by the Planning Commistlon on Bsion recommended denial of the amending approval for a ground- the existing patio deck near the voted 4-0 to deny the walk-out apport its approval. The Council 1 hardcover associated with the roposal for grading* which would yard down to a depth of 3' below posal has been referred by the r review. 3/2/88 Hardcover Calculations as Revised .akeshore Setbacks •r with Grading Plans, Elevation in View of Deck ‘Shore Area ) Cherry Place Cut Relative Visual Impact jnal Methods n Cook s James Piegat er Letter sheet ■: ■:,v. • ./ = - yvV^ •i■Iff'' ^sScming File #1223 March I, 1918 Page 2 of I 6iecmeei< During the review of this application# applicant asked the City to consider its policy on lakeshore grading in light of what seems to b« inconsistent action in similar past cases. In fact, on at least one occasion on Cherry Place in 19i3. the Council approved a cut to create a walk-out that is very similar to what Waldron originally proposed. A photo submitted by Waldron of that Cherry Place property indicates that such a walk-out cut does have a potential for detracting from the natural character of th« lahcahore. The applicant's revised proposal suggests that n 3* deep excavation froei the house to the lakeshore bank will have a beneficial effect on the stability of the lakeshore bank as compared to other methods. Staff has wrestled with various ways to delineate and quantify the valid public concerns relating to this lakeshore bank project. To this end, staff has devised a "point system" that attempts to assess the visual and environmental isg>acts of the various bank restoration methods available for use. The attached table is the result of that assessment process. What constitutes a valid public concern? Certainly, environmental protection is a valid concern, and the Environmental Plan section of the City of Orono Community Management Plan suggests that the visual impact of a project as viewed from the lake or from other properties is a valid public concern, in addition to the concern for lake water quality. The economic feasibility of a private project is not necessarily a valid public concern, but may become a valid public concern if such a project that has negative public impact if not completed, cannot be feasibily completed due to the financial capabilities of a property owner. 1 am not suggesting that the City subsidize lakeshore bank restoration, but am suggesting that the City should not necessarily force a homeowner into the most expensive restoration method if less expensive methods are available that will accomplish the same goals. Staff has sketched nine various methods for restoration of the applicant's lakeshore banks, most of which have been discussed to a certain degree by the Planning Commission and Council, and each of which has both advantages and disadvantages for both the property owner and the public in general. There are some underlying physical principals that apply to each of the methods; M V>' iMmt'’V- J.- ' ■ .“t ■ ■ =■■' Any person meet with subdivision ;oncecning schedules, division in n. proposing the Zoning , to obtain subdivision The Zoning accordance definitions. definitions, e definitions. and Requirements Plan is an initial id serves as the basis and the subdivider and it. S 11.10within sixty days If I and requirements of id requirements upon conditioned either ropriate agreements >rtify final approval complied with all all be deemed finally ute a certificate to lion may be filed or iminary approval and s the subdivider and comprehensive plan or he use, development or platting required reafter, pursuant to od by agreement with irformance conditions of a new application tment has occurred in >n and the subdivider I a consequence of a ;n connection with a .opment, the City may •ferred to herein for h it determines to be P-(S'-::'';*:-srianaing COMisslosi Chairetan Kelly Orono Planning Comission Nmaibers City Administrator Bernhardson tlichael ?. Gaffron, Asst Planning i Idninf Administrator March B, 1918 Smbiecti I12U John B. Maldron, 1951 Concordia Street: - Cotiditi(Mial Use Permit i Variance - Belerral Back Prom Council for Beview of Revised Proposal This Item originally was reviewed by the planning Commiasion on Sovembar 16th, 1987. The Planning Commiaaion racommandad denial of tha deep cut to create a walk-out whila recommanding approval for a ground- level deck eree in exchange for removal of the exiating patio deck near the lakeshore. In January 1918, the Council voted 4-0 to deny the walk-out excavation, finding no valid hardahip to support its approval. The Council failed to eddresa the iaaue of additional hardcover easociated with the ground-level deck. Applicant then Bulaaitted a revised proposal for grading, which would cut approximately halt of the lakeshore yard down to s depth of 3 below the existing surfa''#. This revised proposal has been referred by the Council beck to the Planning Commiasion for review. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit B Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K - Applicant's Letter Dated 3/2/88 - Applicant's Host Recent Hardcover Calculations as Revised by Staff 3/10/88 - Diagram Showing Average Lakeshore Setbacks - Applicant's 2/29/88 Letter with Grading Plans, Elevation Views, Cross Section, Plan View of Deck - Applicant's Photo of Lakeshore Area - Applicant's Photo of 1360 Cherry Place Cut - Staff Sketch on Photo of Relative Visual Impact - Staff Sketches of 9 Optional Methods - Previous Meeting Minutes - Consultant Letters; A. City Engineer Glenn Cook B. Hennepin H.W.C.D.'s Jzunes Piegat C. Applicant's Engineer Letter - Applicant's SBA Loan Worksheet m-'Wy-; • V. v.<y?T: • •A* V • “ ' -^‘ * •' •11.10PROVAL 1 Plat City, action ny lot hapter of the by the »r and !or the es and Ication ec that (View of Includes ^divider pay all iry Plat zoning ary Plat approval hlch the :ity, the ;hat the trtlculac y of the plication deemed execute a roval the ipon such P''' :■iffmi--V-yi wmmmm:• s S llelOrequest the City shall certify final approval within slaty days if the applicant has complied with all conditions and requirements of applicable regulations and all conditions and requirements upon which the preliminary approval Is cspressly conditioned either through performance or the execution of appropriate agreements assuring performance. If thm City falls to certify final approval as so required, and if the applicant has complied •J* conditions and requirements the application shall be deem^ finally approved, and upon demand the City shall execute a certificate to tSt effect. After final approval a subdivision may be filed or recorded. D. for one year following preliminary approval and for two years following final approval, unless tt» subdivider and the City agree otherwise, no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, developmeiU density, lot site, lot layout, or dedication or platting requtr^ or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant w Its regulations, the City may extend the period by agreement with the subdivider and subject to all applicable performance condltl^s and requirements, or It may require submission of a new appllcatlw will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application. In connection with a subdivision involving planned and staged development, the City may by resolution or agreement grant the rights referred to herein for such period of time longer than two years which it determines to be reasonable and appropriate. Subd. 4. Initial Staff Review. Any person subdivision of land within the City shall meet Administrator to review briefly the proposed subdivision a copy of this Chapter and receive advice concerning requirements, required submittals, fees and schedules. Administrator shall classify the proposed subdivision in with Subdivision 5 of this Section. proposing the Zoning , to obtain subdivision The Zoning accordance Subd. 5. Subdivision Classification. A. Class 1 Subdivision. See definitions. B. Class II Subdivision. See definitions. C. Class III Subdivision. See definitions. Subd. 6. The Sketch Plan ~ Purpose and Requirements. A. Purpose. The Sketch Plan Is an Initial presentation of the subdivider's intention and serves as the basis for conceptual discussion between the City and the subdivider and provides beneficial savings for the subdivider. r-if-' . ORONO CC (4-1-84) l'- J fot Ap cut app the ex: Councl1 List Of ■ ■■■ ■ i- . ■.! : -V- ^E; mm/y- i| ■ 1 1 II II f . 'v . ■„ ■•5.. •. • ..* • *.*T • r .. ^ ' 'Wigw.■i •• ■^n 'U---'m§ S3 ‘!lf-A <•'■:■*]» s*H ■ rl! / v*’-^ >/4J»‘ I^W .■rj IBi i , ••'A '^■' /■.l?f - ■ ' '•. '»i'■V\’ V, • •'^-'■]l»'''''-j>' m4%M?wmmm ... r- K'u-’/.'.s .'.'e• •. v^v.- \ =- •• • «m ■~:.^:7:-4t i ‘ ( vf,%■, Tlj-Ttll'1 .-■■ '^■''.?■1<;iwife'iwsi'mmB .•••v." ■■ :r - ■■ *r^ \f ll.LQSBC. 11,18. SBIDIVISIQB AFPLICA^IO* PlOClDtJRB,mcBM. MO BQOiBiaDrrs.AFPBOVALSobd. 1. Restriction* on Dsvelopoent trior to »ppto»jl. 0^ • p » h_ th. Clt» lot th. con.ttuctlolla\i,ciKrto, ih,c<«.ttuc.i« to ‘tX pt‘Ji2^’ ?s*p»l itoox put. ot »“Trro:"4rxir.iro«T. i««iiT .u «. ’^uieVur •pp*o»4i’^*t^ c^u* pttou. tuy b. ‘“"J ^UkUoS of crt.U l.pto«..nt. ..cl. « rood., otllltU. dcaln«9« structurs*. Subd. 2. Coordlnstlon of Flsslbl® lonintj Rppllcstlon With gfibdlvlslon Kpproesl. .ubdi.Uton t«,U» bJ'c«;iJ*o<it*,lwXt!S«o.lr «lth th, t.,le» of iiSMUiSiilHfi •ppllcstlon. R,vU». Revise of the fltslbl* ss“.sr‘xuo^v r«^r.“p?^.Sand Bobsequent recording of the Final Plat. Subd. 3. Official Sub«ls*lon Dates.f m ww — — — y A For the purpose of this Chapter a l-rS: r^iiboo-^:? js: In writing by the applicant# B. When a division or subdivision to ehich the §*le ”A*‘o°rthl c\%5‘Vh.^ir“»'u"rT tJo'’".”!! c.rtify th.t' the SiwivUlon «guUtlon. of th« City do not apply to th. pattlcoUt division. ✓ C If the City or the responsible ptell.lnatlly approvad, and upon demand /.pp'”.! the rppU«n\^ay%r,Ve.?‘frnVl approval ly^the City, and upon such 427 (4-1-84) ^'■7 ■<''X viT'’ -U ^ \ [,;^v .: ' ' ¥7''" . ..?V^ . k: r ■•: • .•■V- V : ■.■••:•. ^• Av :vV ' V :A ^ .A*. • *• A^ , : i . ^7 j --77-<v- m70'. ■:'7y:.;... = .:i’V ' . -V r--J X:M7x'}y''■’■ySyUr■ ■■■■ ■:-■f A-;A., ■ff' mv-xm-m$ p> •• ; v:: V ;>mmmm v;.. } 1 ::a .. V.;- = a*'.^ ■*.•.. a ' a. s iifsSi, requth#applwhl< thr< assu as cood appi that recc tor the off den! or I Ita the and unl< real wil req sub< by auci rea: sub Adm a c req Adis wit •• V ; • V\ > • . ^ . • r ;*. . •^• . •• L_5 ly. .•- y'h'K-i- "U'-'-V •.. y fix 'In' ^r: /r-.--1.; ,Arator tt, 385 Orono ion Class III I prsllninary mnission for tat the septic itted and he r the Planning nts that they 1 the septic I notice) and In light o£ r review, Mr. 20 day review lerefore, the iction by the two lot plat ric Dettluff !lfically the las failed to tf the septic lay not be an ng each lot. subdivisions been located : 1 would not icroach Lot 2. prove of the ere lot lines troved by the le Greentrees eady approved I result of a WMmMi:irVo¥* t^msrnmmm » i fcp?‘.r i. 4 m ■mm V -■■■ m'^yBf''''. A mm mmt - m i^r ■m -i' = 0f3* wmmmm P *■?.:• : . : • • ••■•;...■>::/-V :••■■ ■':■••■ :. i -V a:•=::rv..f..-Mmie viL« so.1218CITY w oaowo p.o. BOX eeCrystal Bay, MN W2T1CB QV niiniivs OOMMISSICH ACTIOH55323 473-7357 TOt Bdvard Callahan CDPItt fOt Gray, Plant Law Offices 3400 City Center 33 Soutli 0th Street Hinneapolis, l® 55402 Date of Sotice: 2/18/lB Larry Berg Fredrickson 8 Byron 1100 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MM 55402-3307 Roger Nherry Dept. 28, P.O. Box 9300 Minneapolis, MM 55440 fTPI at APPUCBTlOlt XX Subdivision MTB OP MXrriMG: 11/16/87 VOTBs 5 For Againtt Pieaeiag rn—l salrm recoats nils tlm folloviogt XX Tabled for reasons noted ^low sons AID SFBCIAL OOB>ITIOaSl 9 1. Confiraation of exact location of existing septic systea that serves IfOt le If iyit«» •ncroaches Lot 2§ the lot line must be realigned or applicant has option to install a new systea within boundaries of proposed Lot 1. 2. If it ia the intent of the applicants to not show the designated wetlenJs within the western portion of Lot 2 (see attached), please make ai...at.geBents with the Orono staff so that a field inspection can be scheduled in ear.'y spring. Your subdivision will be scheduled before the Planning Commission as soon as the City Is in receipt of information confirming exact location of Lot I's septic drsinfield. This information ahould be submitted 8 days before the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission (3rd Monday of the month) to insure scheduling on the agenda. Applicants* next scheduled meeting 1# depender*- upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the March 21, 1918 meeting is March 14, 1988 or April 11, 1988 for the April 18, 1988 meeting. a:- y- AA ■ Am :::AAmAyyAymAvAy.mAA-^mmmm: ;V .■"•• ' :- A ■ ■ y - y . v*'■ .>V • ^m •y> . •fIPlanniit^ CoMisBion ChairiMn Kailaf Vlan8iii9 CoBBiiBBion Maabart City Adalnistrator barnhardaon w jftanna Mabuath» Buildla^ ® Xonln9 Adainiattator March 9> Itit |121f Batata Of Buth Salth/Cadric Dattloff» 3B5 Orono Orchard Boad South - fraliainary Subdivlai^ Claoa III - Third Raaiew Mr. Callahan haa aakad that ataff raachadula tha pralialnary aubdiviaion application bafora tha Planning CoMlaaion action at your March awating. Ba la fully avara that tha a^tlc ayatan Infornatlon for Lot 1 haa not been auboittad and ha undaratanda that at tha praaant atate of tha raviaa tha Planning Coaaiiaaion »uat dany tha application aa praaentad, Tha Planning CooMiaaion fully advised tha applicanta that they could not act on tha praaant application until tha aaptio information aaa aubmittad (review tha ancloaad notice) and applicanta agraad to tha tabling at tha meeting. In light oi Section 11.10 6ubd. 3(A) and (C) ancloaad for your review, Mr. Callahan no longer agraaa to the tabling and tha 120 day ravlw period haa lapaad (application filed 10-15-87), therefore, the City muBt Bchadula the application for formal action by the Planning Ccamiaaion and Council. Staff Racomwendation - To recommend denial of the two lot plat Application of the Batata of Ruth Smith and Cedric Dettiuff finding the application incomplete concerning apecifically the naceasary aeptic information for Lot 1. Applicant haa failed to Bubmit information regarding the exact location of tha aeptic ayatem and therefore tha proponed dividing line may not ba an accurate div^alon of the existing improvements serving each lot. The City has conaiatently delayed action for rural aubdivlsiona where existing on site treatment systems have not bean located and especially in this case where the owner of Lot 1 would not agree to move the dreinfield if it were found to encroach Lot 2. The City does not grant setbac)t variances or approve of the creation of easements for drainfields in matters where lot lines have not been established and not officially approved by the City. The case referenced by Mr. Berg regarding the Graentrees subdivision involved the encroachment of lines already approved by the City in a previous subdivision and was a result of a costly mista)ce by a septic contractor. ■ r;>-. I- ' -I'■■ ■■ ■■■ . • . Ji! ■ • . » • • . ' ....-It.? : V - - .. Jv; '■ w si -rf.'l- piii.. m / - - ■■ mi ^4 i*'- ' ! *-■ . V ;:.V . iS iliilitM riiM'y-:-'j 'W::■ mimm:yyyA:hm^yA "i-S'mr ■; m:-y:A am If■: i ■ - ‘scaeK ~ ■.. :V ;w - ;v A: -*•- "‘ ‘4ae ■ .» . WJ is&iii If-.V - V \ : . A.i > . ; ... a::V - ■■■y.-' - r-Jf ■■■. ■. : ■y. ^y-y-y:y.y: ■AmiyMtmm iS«t * py<' ^TV" tl. v.v;;: -r li^M 1. |V0,-^. : \>-mm] V t™■ ;■ ■4C-i-5i'jirr;-Si;;.sSiiiiK;K«aSiC§iPiM iiM IS P^7-r'-r. .... ^y7;^.v, bIp ^v ' •"7"v7' myymm Fii'y-:> a IfeSf V' ■ ■" my • * • * *^ • I .’ ■ V'. : ■-: ; r ...»• . mym '''■■■■ -. -mm fe'V-m^mmmmm y^ ■ JU N H’-": 7^C-.y::" -V..,. =-.^ ■/‘•yy'-V:-/v, '.;-..r.^-:r- :v' ■■ ■ . ..■ ■■-vy;v'yy-.. .■;• ^ "■ ' ^ . r ;■>: -7^^ /- •• -^r:- V.: --^ . ■ ■■ - ••• *• %y-;;';y;-- ■•;•■ ■■ y.---- '■■• •*••.’ ■ • : •'• wmm-imMm-r' I®iiw ■f y .yyyy m : ky.: V ■♦’-mmmmi V ; .-/pviyjyw l^jjajL‘^rv^‘'-'a^SPJ aar y'J 1< I Vi Bk' 1 ■ :,..r::.^~-.- --J fy7';••i ;>•■ :••■*> i®:':*1K111 K :7^' >-V uv;.: -•...■ y- .: (fm:i ?Vi- ■■ .. ■ ■ -. .•:. ;:v/ -^.;- ymy:yyJM:}^^t ■■ V -, . .•.•• .^«^.• ••;■ .... . .-. ^ 1 yMmmi Si •V?V :. . .. r am~.:v;.-.a; wfeSfc^a.:;': m;;:^v.-^a:.-vr.=3IIRwi . :aAc aa-®sK iiS^a*. ‘ aa? a -.. ■■.;••• a.' .;•••..»; • .'■ :'.-fe. . '•O ■ ; -. . rr •.: a.;.--A'i i&:: mi: .(■■'■■■■■■■ aa:; > i , }; :<.aaV :■%■:. A-'': ia#Sa) ’*%/'-ti 7 ?1 :■ •- ■■■• -.^!. .’.’..A f■:-:■! a a: ;Ut ..aa-a-a- ...a _ -'■• 't:A t: M3mm [■m:W X- mm *;^.:A Am •^AA- . - ■. m l#^'l til'* * -c I lINlii 1111% K k ISi Mm ii rMh-m I « • r; I t’jii-yp:vrt^;^ ' :■ wmmm' itei r- 'v v^!iv Lr-Sf' % m 4 ♦ J» t Jp ••1 J * J i-y mi^:m BjK-'-vS vr.;|. : ;ii^ ' ;■ .-f-, . .2 ■ .;-v.- ;; . mmm^ mmm fi --rWJ ip -:mm. ■•"=.•• ••; f :-fAA-A ^::S:Kl5i y-mk mm 11 * ■:■ -.r'm y iV:; Jm m:n.my * ■■.( : r : ': ; •■■••• '•'••. '■.'; rnymm '# ,■• -i ,!l4« Krmmymm ■.; • • .v -V ^,v.. '(»#■.-rvm&mmm a-mm mm M'' iSiW ■Iji-■'yym .V. -' :'-:.S;/';M 1> .;•:•■■' • ' ■' •■ ■ . .; ••:7 • • •'- •' Or*^r Cfti. \a****U4c. vi>i.»* w/rufc* ftt- -ueMf , .(f Ua^.*fl<?4 jip# 7>ft> r ■ K>U, a*«4«V W« pAje.<ii(f*uf 4 e’ e I M V V^- v-;='./:^-. "■ ^ • vice structures# ismission lines# ons# booster or umbing stations# )ower substations# .fty feet from any trict. Prior to :he architectural he neighborhood in mote the general d above that have sarings for public .tional use permit other appropriate to approved plans structures will affected property ended plans by the Subdivision (A) is Retail and Service e in force from and ebruary# 1987» by a M RESOURCES( 55106 FlLE^^■ !10L COMMISSION! B5 CONCORDIA STREET ON OF ROAD review on the above cation follow. - : ; >-V ' V.' Wmm» la mainly a concern of will have a .-hance to procedure. Pr-jllmlnary aters will be mir.'*mal letlng roadway. 988» the Ehlert house elevation. Since the City of Orono’s Flood lood elevatione we have /e^ that the Minnehaha ation.) the southeast shore of ts concerns• r these projects. If you S0Kiit£.JT«iv.i ^PLOVER ,'v.'M■;. Tr I % ’ "V- •''■• ■ ■ '■■ ■■ • •■• :.■^. : s. •.: ■■s^i■=k*v > .- ; ;i' " Vii-'M 5(0)-A3-f7 ( Sl«vat«d tanks, lit-, stations and provided no building shall b« located lot line of an abutting lot in an R District. Prio 1V..!» I 1k• *•|mr.. ^JntVnV sS^h Ver.it it .hall bV* f ound thaV VhV a’rchitec^r. 1 design o ’ servi^ structures is compatible to which it is to be located and thus will preote the general welfare. Public service structures as defined above that Nav been a^troved by the City at required public hearings for publl ?ISJovili5^l projects shall not require a conditional u.e permit bT^ucrstructures shall be subject to all other standards set forth In this sectionj amendments to approved Pj*”? Jnvolving design and/or placem.nt of orooerti require written notice by the City to all •“•5=^*^. bv Ihi owners 14 days prior to the adoption of the amended plana by the Council. section 4 - Orono Municip*! Code Sections 10*«0» hereby amended by adding the following use to the Retail and S_ Business DistrictJ mk:m f- ••■ If V-; /' 31, off-sale Liquor Store section 5. ini. ordinance .hall take effect and be In force ftsB and after the date of Its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council this 23rd day of February, 1987, by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays. ( ATTEST! James R. Grabek, Mayor City Clerk • - ■ ■, 5^ ■^1 <?'■ :i ' vt Sf V -n i’T— ‘i..i.e-4 I! VIV , c. m V I liil '“‘S^Maich 11. 19it jMcn* A. Halwvth BttlUiftg A Xonlng Adainlatrator cm or (Mono feat Office tos Crystal lay, MB 55323 ;r-'.mmmflha|^ sTAti o*■”TO€[f!3BSOir.Si>I^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAl RESOURCESy„0figHO 2f^7523 1200 VAIBCl «0AD, ST. PAUC, MM 5510* fiUMOaiSiUBHMttfiT'i M: APPLICATIOB #125* HETHOfOLITAS WA_;TE COTOOt CCMflSSKMI! COBDITIOWO. USE FEIMIT/TAllIAHCI APPLICATIOM #l25i JOHII & KATHY EHLEET, l7S5 OWCOIDU STtEIT AfPLICATlOH #1251 ACPRFt SCHULT* • VACATIOH Of SOAD Dear Ha. Mabuatli: Thaak yeo for arnding information for our rcvieV OB tke referenced pemlta. Onr co»nta on each application follow. •kora The opgrading and replacement of sewer lines Is mainly a cjncern the DNR Lands Bureau. The Division of Vetera will have a chance fganent through the Bureau of Lands license procedure. Pr*:.lmln Indications are that impacts to protected waters will be m..rJ because the se%Mr line is mostly beneath the existing roadws). 7' I According to the plans recelred March 3, 1988, the Ehlert house addition does not encroach below the 931.0’ elevation. Since the flood Insurance Eats Map (enclosed) and the City of Orono a Flood Ordinance consider elevation 931 the 100 year flood elevation* we no floodplain concema. (We understand however^ that the Mlnnahaha Creek WSD uses 931.5 as the 100 year flood alavation.) The application for vacation of roads slong the southeast shore of Forest Lake does not raise any protected waters concema. Thank you again for the opportunity to review these projects. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Tom Hovey > Staff Hydrologist METRO REGION DIVISION OF WATERS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER |- •■'v' mm Si:'Mm&mm. i J%'V- -•.J ■m 'll IJtCwm pr- ; • m-:- .4 , mm mm y-'r 'r=*^ ■■ ' b-' ■; ■:V ••<.•'.'0'■ •’ S'-'. • .-:.:••••.=; -v^--/... ■> --r ."v:'-v. •■‘A hr■■rMii^v 5•1.A' ;.•' ♦-’ •March 7. 1988 pemlt application* to tha following tnt Rasource* >f the contract docuaents of the Ln August 1988. lis office. 1C. • -S'-- -A ■V, A : /;. ■• .::: ■ pal* . •< • • *. ..•?•• • ;• /•• .*'* ..■■■• •■•V' saaaa<a:y Harcli 7. 19M fiM Caaaittioa tiat prepared and tuMitted peralt applicati<»>a to fo|lo«in§ agenciest A.) Bennepia County liglway %epartaent I.) Hinnesota Departatent of Matural Icsources C. ) Minnehaha Vatershed District D. ) Miimesota foliation Control Agency I.) City of Orono . . . . All perait requireaentt vill bacoaa a part of Oremo Intarcaptor projact. contract idocuaanta ■ wr'% The IS sonth project Is scheduled to begin in August IfAS. If you have any questiemt, please contact this office. Yours eery truly. nSTtOO, ROSEMi. AlfI»lIlJC t ASSOClATiS, iNC. >e - . ^ ^ J J y>:.'M * •■•:•• -i ,.-i . : -.yv/K^v- ■—I sflt . : r;- ; ' .V , : ■ ,:- mm a::X. mmm a.v:',= :-.:•••• •"1 •• >'.j ,:p , m! iy-: V'. IHii • •. ■ . . '..:••• ■• ■>• •. .•C..V•••: : ::-:/■■■ ,^.- <■•. ■-. V..- '.- v ■v.-...::-- =•■.■•^;•=V-Ai; immM.■■•■.;■: A/,: ■' ;.-; a i -1,.^ v^7.K-;•V ’. •. / 7.- :. ■‘' ' >*' '‘ai-l -■ ' -^ :■ J it m t *■JW Ic* I fc c• c»i ti •f tf •1• PI pf Pf» PI Pt pf Mk « iCA PMP I PfTSonestrooRosene Anc^Ik A \j| Associates ingpwvn P ArcNtccts Harcii t. litt Gitf «f Or«M •«» M Crystal t«y. Hi SSliS 4ttat lU. J««uw Mabtssth t«l »>. 1IS4 - Hctropalltaa ¥ssts Ccatrol Cowsitsi^ IQSP rU« So. llf-12Sf Pf Pf Pf Pf Pf ■» c mt 9 MP PI **( tMHNL A i •• P>^ PfA SSH^Pl P4 l«R-SSaB ry of tho ffiCC • QtoUO Inftrctptor T»prnrfi nt Frojtct* fhm •xistlaf OroM iBtsrceptor it «Hul«r capacity. Backups within tha systaa Ihawa occarrad during paak rainfall avantt ratalting to tha naad for aMrgancy l^^tog into tank trucks to prawant sawaga orarflows into Laka Klnnatonka. Tha project area has boon uadar study slnca 1»7*. It haa baaa dat-rsiinad that aatranaout flows cannot ba furthar rachtcad cost affactiwaly. Tha Intercaptor *7®*^** tharafora being upgradad in capacity to convoy paak pretent and projactad futura flows. Tha SWCC - Orono Intarcaptor InprovesMnt Projact conaiata of tha construction linaal foot of IS* to 21* diamtar ralnforcad concrata plpa aanltary aawar: 9.500 linaal foot of a* to IS* dlanatar ductlla iron plpa forca saint tha ranovatloa, conatn'ctlon. or removal of lift atatlons at 7 aitat: and tha rtstoratior of disturbed highways ani properties. Ninety percent (901) of the construction sctiwitT will occur withi>A the right-of-way of County Loada 14. 51. and 19 as indlcatad on anclosura Mo. 1. rasaining lOZ of construction activity will occur u^'tn private properties adjacent to the right*of>#ay. Road closuraa will occur on County Roads 51 and 19 where indlca:ad on enclo­ sure Mo 2. The road closures will not occur aiaultaneoualy as the project is being constructed in 2 stages. Stage 1 conaiata of pipe placesert and resto­ ration along County Roads 84 and 51 to County Road 19. Stag* 2 consists of pipe placeawnt along County Road 19 to a point approatoately 1.0<i0 feet north of County Road 15. All work of phase 1 oust ba coaipleted prior to coausenca- nent of work on phase 2. This will facilitate traffic rerouting within the projact area. Page 1. 233S Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 ^ .. . -ip' f-\ h. w •• - . mm • ■••.•..■• i-'IIIN -< _I*•< <9 m'^3N><< «• (A :pKf m ui 9 SVI > M 04 •< n ^ ^ m ^So 2-^ •M r#h: ^Co § z M Hill*E! V lO MV *-*I S ^ N N 8 ^4 ^ M M •< 1si" JO f #»uzK M gS Ut 9 Mt »> M «< - *-3 9 04 S^8 m H ? iS S.1 JS m Of JD Ml H *»4 MlH Z ;-4 Ml 9 Ml > 04 ^ — ►- Wa r- M>3 * ^z 8 tj m M •< I m Ml 9 S?“ So •< I— 9 XI O O 9mi: 04 9 Ml O M ^ ‘ Q -4 Of 9rv ^ Z 92 M r*i i» r* ^ *®3a5?9 n g •> ! 9^Ifi: "S"* "•*8 si ^ S » 9 9 g»5*2S-< 9 r* ■» 9 9 9 r* _ 9W M z 9 ••sgt- - aifNr 2gi S'"*8 ► 9Si'* Z 04 JO XI O u| 5£88iEf*^N <8" rn 9 •- scSi'v i S§ < -< ■< ►- *« *0 M -^J I §3g Ml ^ 04 > l» H 04 « 9 Ml Ml g ►- < H H Z O 9 9 9 O » XI ^ 9 < 04m 9x>-1nz8 i s n H -< M Ul M 9 9li 3 XIr*is Ism • TI M » 9 04 I '■’ i ■■'' - : h: 'y'J :'::yy-!y^y<yy:y. -v;:. :•»■ KiS V '.^La «s W"0*:-■: ..j.. , .iSfe v^^¥‘S^v 4 If* .*SStf4if*''*■•=V.r /Sii|f>r-. ' ;-i'-.-- *'s ■wrmHtaMMH'III!iM«3?83 ^ s ( ’7 .y ^a I S'a ff8 I i I •/-••V .Ma ■^1•V ,V.: ;?-f^;;vVVt‘%:-Vv:V-^:- - ' i 1 7^1 V V-^ 0.V-; V fr'--- ■■.:.•■; ■V :r :■ .-;.,:v> y.. ■ y-:-'}^y- ■ ’’ ■■' A-"- r f~vv. :^- v:i:^ Kil:;« /-ysy'y'iyi SK«:s':3 ^iii iiyy* • • ’ • A -.• 8 K V ? ' ' '>:i- ' |-: „ ■■•■•■ V. - v-w-y-m::.^«rvv■■■ i" ^ ^ ^ iw.. ■^^vi.l^ppi^'.-• y-••;■; •< i'm (9 HOW>h n r«t m gi O 61 *Q m m r* o » » o o » 4aS£*S8|5ji ri"h«::||!«i ‘2 ^a?loS {{wis ! ! il*3 ‘ »a2 “ « f2S*81 *l!*l!i f%f% •- ?23|Sr Ni Q 5 m «i <» M ^ «issr? *5s2**^ m m “ r> r* ^2 g K r- 9^ I*. E ^ ^ 5 3 c fi >« S®£ 58*= 0 mv5q3-'*2 srlaiE* ^ ^ ^ H V f9 — N m Q m •>•^ » 5 i • H k - , ^ry '*■-’0 1- # J?.' ■i^a^ss -s -*| -< <s> r- X m m r* _ ^K Ml 2 m »• •=‘i== 3 8 cqH ^ < I . ^ 61 I-' M ► K H V4 i« K V» Q*-•<-< H Z c m M m c « « ^ fV Si- m-^-.>••■ •■' '■■; -'i Ml i i m V<t • .' y--;-vyy=/v :' , -■ ■ ■ ’ 'jKsy y ■■■.'■• "'• ^yy;:'- *:. 1 "*l»® • 1=-. ■•;:/ yy • ■; j mmmm mmm-. ■r-': - y : v;, ,■ .’• ■ -v;.; y./!. :=''.C^ ..'■a.vi-vry-: •ii ;■ vi I''rv;^•^•\ i- ■^•- ► #> Ml ft ^ -4 Mi Q C Ml r 5 r ^ V4 W S M> •^ S5^8 ^ o 5 5 -"5 '*5 i»«8 8 occ^5> ^ O •.*■ ’.••■* •;.’ ■. • y >.y:''^;-v. :■-■ ;:/:0 V .-- yy ■■ ' ■: '■■■'. ^'J 0^ ■ ;v--y,. I vl ”;iH^ 'ii ^>;>’ .••->••. ¥,■iv.’i'v...-: ■; > PH I M Ml eo » m Z SI Pf»s®ss^ r* ft* »M Ml «> _ r* Ml *•Pill!H O ^ifs§|5 H -< H H -M^ Q IZ, 1 > ^ «a o H ** » - 2 2 fi8 S )K 8 4 • « _ Mi S m m 3 Ml o* •• - S U9 IPB ;S ftft «m ISSI K";.-I H *!°*"k S ?«| Ml r* <s Ui <c5« i*»- rw I •^1 I•-« H •- “ NlI N) s: oc» S!S 5-3"®-< o <9 0» •-* B O 04 r> 01 H> goj < ► M* Ml PI 70 H o B O •- > I sir H 6 IM o B O O [# :;J .!':y ■; M... r^-■■■ X- A-x.:.* f > -< -< •nJ •«• H -4•'i'"'' i 3 O ^ ^ H »-* mm _ w r- r- » Ml r* r- O MlMl •-•^ •» *!?■;-v ^ -. -v ■■■ ■ ': ' -h:: mmmm . •. ^ t. PjPP t 1' . ■:*k;:’V;->v-4SSal V,- ■■ '%m •■' (LA. ■ !C4':!..v..*: mmtMMmm liPSmim. - \:-.y;'-V .■ . ' ■•i'jf,'' 'r *'' ''' '"^pv:II p** § .X I 3I C> / ^ *-\ ‘ • ./c* W g % N m £1:1*1*^1*:**:^ '--■::fy*-:*.|chA v:^, :i;y . yyl'--^^.* .. p«^'' "0Ml ■*•••*•* V . ■•• ■•»" • :.'.>• y .y '. ,■ •- ? ■■• .. V =v-yy^ ^ y-'-: i' fei <? mrnm *i*y if< / ^ i, -j ;:*f» y- y-v :-M:.<pr'.**^V':;y PIcmBy ^yyy*: wmm K- ' ■: yyyg. .- -. ytt-' ;•: 'i;. • ••-.•■-:‘v^^ yj m >i mmw?"':'; ;y •«r*: : ' ymm.’ y. ■■• -V ■.' '■'-* * - ■ ■ ■■■•'■' V:V:v; )SJ .-yy-yy.v.'y ;*>)y i ••■• '■■■'y’y -y;*** ■/•*.. . \ ‘ ' • ** ■' ^y ^'■■y.-■• •^••y*y : y -yy;:*:: -.1 "." ^''^' y ■* .:‘ ••:'■; -4 -' y , > = .*■ M-.; :.; w*., . .•. -:■.. -:m y'^^^li|y;i . : • -y: .. .- :••, -■ -■ A :" ■ r ■/ ■ ' mmm■ ' * y . ■.■'•:■■•"■ • yv.yy-y. ■•..••.••: .jy^f |i|iiiiiSS s!ti(lil,»s=i !« V p 2 *i*:*S7 iJ45J I I Hii 8iifii !• X z •>*a35*iT P Z ^ *4 P**4 m X -.1 H*n 3 %mm EK**58r< Ig C. k.C HI i j^«*8m m I m si • Is *S1 s r- 4Bi M HI I ^l;v.5^r|.f:.:,:,,y. aiF i; •liiilii ■''-... -xi.^:-j -. j •.•■■ : ..;.•; := .v.-jX. ; . v. f mm fs»r H >» Z t r* H #•1* iS**8- 5SgS*i-8 •Ss--- BgS 7 i i» a Zmmmr* o Sr 1-^ iso S'*!is 8 ^ ^ •» • 8*^ f ii g = C i. y •■■■«’'■? w»i i. ...•V' 'r . .*' ■* * "'•^y- V**! y • •.. • rv'/y" ■; 0:1"-. iii iLi: teffisswssv'fe'* vS V'r ’ -JMStw ■•••:• ■ • >5-:. ;^ ••• :r • ^::.[ • : ' ■••; • ■ £’■: i • V ' ■' \ •' VS.-.";- • :•-.* *C: ■jL '.::V •■•;•. ■ .' ;./ V'"' .==1 m Ms^0i I '4 '1?-•;.•»« ■ ' ... ••; •■ ■•; •■ V ■ ;:L’' ::•■■••■ v| fc'-vfi-; ..JiT-.-;::-- ... :; -:r V- y: -v;: > -.y ■•■•;. ■'':.,:-:7mim^-.:^- •■ ...^.;alPlili|5|J :s2--•f!l|iiSE« sl'M" i li!s 1 f SS3ISI w o^m MSilm §1 •• < S3 8;I 5«SD5*C « ozt m «v* r« <« e IS" ,Ss(T Z z SiM -4 * ? ^m 9 y» % 3$ M 5 C liMI'2 = ??5»• r* ^^ M M 1*4r»» #fHI I; 3i3zl •|i! I£S 9^ ^ a >< m •4 Z ¥« p|£ I 2 ® 9 • Itf•- r* H ui 9 M" ? O r* f- M ^ M M 9m n o • W> -4 a~ rs£ f) ora o 8 $ -I4-if L ■ '■>«£' ■■.i^^T^V’*HSIiHIis:;3S«o r- ^is5i*f PIN *** VI V U CA » r<l II Z ^8 Ss §- ~S |S *n M O M y:- y,;.-.'|#:yy!Bf:T ^ . . :jy -..S' - • “’■:SiPF: V." r^-yv:::.:yv::yv"^ !5C • apsr:*;^^ NIi ' .... If''",-" ■ jhy'y ■>■:■-'' y'- * : .. ■•W - ^ . ■ ’; * : ,.; V ,; ; .\>vv.^.-^ •t? • ..fci-^^TF •V-';,- m- (■■ \'r-:-/•> . . ^ ■■ :- 'v V^ * ■'m !{! s s i? 25 I. f s s m d H ^ rv» M M X U4 JH Q *o H l;i 3q M W m mn n Q o m m Sx o 70 m o M f»l ^ < -M o ^ n > iOf- (. i. »- sssr 88^1::m m r- f- W ^ r- r- X v« m m Q H -4 n o H H rtt o mm •- o m ;d *' ^U- 88 V m z Siis1®‘*81__ *-* EK-CSg^ A ^ i_ (.it sIjM W»C ® F 0 0 0jgah ?a m 8' •- N>H F S i m #•n X *A y yt -8* is fttg^SS •K ^ r* <n N e L» ^sg=>r?n •• M •- |C M a o P i/i > > •< r> < <e^ss ? ®»si"'8 a ^ V ••.■'^ ■ .. •: •^. r.v 1: •vCvia^ -ip»r« ■ ”■' - •: . -- . • . V „■, - . ■:,"' M::: b ; b br7'b:'^'^"V\-C-v^ W .v/f Si4^mm IT. F»SSte:W,;- .'>9 ;:.b!m&sm.&bb"Sb% F'“ ”,'l»: ■• • I’C 2L*i£i;i*:tsJ|JI-■*¥ ,i=b 812 a fl ^ s;if? 0 81 V M □ M m <«A H4 sgi-l- si 5?S*2SSSg-^t =|5i iif..};; JS?|i M a Q mmm9 o § -f,r ■ X —8 ? T3*Pir ^ fSiis*1^ a F » » »8( 8 CS8-SS M 0 F It 5«-3 M inF ►5 • 3 i » 8if«|23 ii§’M 4A 0 P«3IF »H 25mK83f si mm r* Fa R-8 O *- "-;V ||Pass !5i h!l ES2*2S-< f\» n ■» f5 hi m X ^• ------i» m 181158iF r* F ^li!!Pml 9|S2S8 *S!=J ! ,=!5S? m X f- H m5113^- l M »- a a • M ;;) # M IH 5 2i*» f F * F»1'hi h ij S ft m GA #» a® f|: J 8^ m am» 1^ u£• • •; 8nIssI► r* r- • • *◄ t» r- r* 9 F H M M I,|s? ii: a ■m--: .:■ m" 1ite:ib'' . ■Tb^.;-:AV...;- /.=; . .-. ■ V m '' "b- i-" ' b ?b;' ^>V '• j '•.■b--;-v "i. :-^'---•rb''*bb V: WmM F» mm&i my.-:]:: ^'s'b ■■" rv; -.•;--/:a 'i.. . >•p^:?TFS.:-Wi. , V^ A-u «K ! ni 9 M « V Ml n ui X m f« 1» 2 S Z 14 I? ht IN* 8 -< O' -< -< § i IISS 3 Wl 14 14 O *8 ►* ^ M K M r- r- J* r* r- IN* • MM fl» (4 CA T es JE k ••55 M 14 V 1 3Si!C! O m o 2^ c o 4* 9 si>aii lljSf •— NI 9 3 ^ M m m o >8* (T ^il!P" i ► m m jj g 14 W ?35P S ^ 1 i »« -4•SS ifi n !SSSS S n n 1 rj kM isi| tS'^SS ►- o -0 *0 M o 8 % ■ :-..v-v. ■ ^ .. " •- -*■- • ♦•rn-ri. ••••jiillfpi • ••^;=i>:-:; iffi&t “ /•:v ■■■ "c. :V :^: v;:- ' : ■•. -vyf ■ K«s, -, .-V .. .' . ''.;r •• mmm v: ■: ■ -;m :--u.mi- ■i 1% misii :*« fi s • SS c 'Imm SSSESJg r* f- >555 ? 3 M n n 2 n SgSS J . :-p s-'/.=;; « s . :- • ;. . ■■•S ■■'■.■• ' : ■■. " ' ^•■' ■ ■■ .■■■■• ■■■■ •'■■■ ' ■■■:J ■Mm :■:• ; .VJ.. -aV ;-v --; 'v .^ .;:..: . . . ; . ■■ .1 •. ; .. :• m%;;;:-;.r:;i"i V:; . - -H: ■"■- ., ■ '■■■:■/>:::■/■:■■ y\-.- :^: ,•. •.- ;: ■• : .» :;S^sm ■ -:b> :; y:;>n ^; is E ^ n O M N V» r»i rn ^♦'J1 XHW ;Q n 9 ^ H H N•NIIf#04 Wiftffi X 0) 9 •-iilllM9904«o 3 5i»M AfoO 8 3S 0) 0> si S r»i O' 3 3 X o Mn 04 » ani M •» !$; X »« riil ■' '•■“••■-'::•• ^..•i^ -mN -<W*s s ss^ass:: ► o *5 ifi om n n 04^sss*- •0 < o -4 iS |8 L Pm!-.*- r 1.;=:-3'"^• kvcmWM:;i»gi t r'-' ij!I;.^i' •V-'-3 'i/ ,'■' -: .;' :n ^:.-.r Jr .. m i.v -Ml'n" i V.:V: ::; • ’ rz/^.wrnifm -M ; . . V • " ■ ■ ■ ■■■■ ■■"' . /V^ ■ ' i ■ ;■'■•■ iU^i ... ••/i.v;;.'v'V- Vv. T- yv ••..••• ■' V-.*.' ■ ;■ .. ;■>:.,:V:Vv;P-;:3 S-ViI;.;:;- ■: ■••; 5^i*;v ■■ s-W^-.M[\.' :’ ! ■ . *■ .-■V,!*-^.. ,r" MM Mi : .-5.^ ' "^-■■ 'if - ■■;-i«:i - 4 - ■■ -Mm- ■ t^V: . •' ! ' • . ii *<V'r. , . , • W mjMMt '■^59 ' y ' •:■' : 'S -r ; M ■mC:-M.■_-ja4k.; ;■■ .iv. 41 ■:.. y i-i ;:. hMxm • V I■m -m s <-“gIiS*| mhi«! 1- SS i“ isiSs *^1 # MOs:*s^f SI?" > 92 O « r- E 9 0> *5^2!",|S? i9 ^ ^ B ^•*3"»:E3*l!i«t r- sss-ss -^y.m ■■■ ■' ••'Mss>yli,':1 ^fe^iVy-•:■'• A.Msil.si 3» 1 9 V I-'I: 1 Si I J f«» 9 ^ 5 9 2 & K B 9 ^Z •< r* r* X ! M .. ✓ m 9Pir*9 *9 1 r" ♦E P* •*Hi'•Si !sSp*c^ais- ?8 8 ESi?28<< «4 9 9 9 •• #> LL^ilV1^5529 9 S M 3SoSf?H 9 <N|“3 iS»•• *iS S8C92 5-RSi*“ ► 1 f- r* » if 9 9 9 •• S2i= :i. 6lE»S 3 i . >■ i ■At;!i:hsS» f £|**2Ss*IXK I j»l;iP *»“>S» ^32228 ««, »i« < <- «' INI O *-4 M *- ^ a o 9 S!3nn V 2 6 9 9 9 ^ E m m P •a 6 iN»Q m *< o4 IS ^ § 23§ ^8*Og« yy>y"yyy • 8 .•.. *.* ::.. • • •••• ■• •. ••. • ■—vVsi >r; I IP ¥L. .*.* ■•■• •a^^'v u-x1:1Pii*^®#i:'»■ r-vff:• %:, • V..- :-r A- -i '-*- - * :•liess^':i:i : i ■ii- . ■'::. ■ •• i ■■■ ?-;■• MMM-Mk :■■ -'M ,-?l r.'-" ivi i" -■:=I pi;- • S'-' V-'* W-: y ;i. : ■. -vv-i'' / Riist> V " V v..f/-;-; •V-«r.iir-:.•- .^-0V :y. .• -.. m■'-‘if' j.‘‘ mm Waia ached 1/2 Section mapssldentlalspecify)ruction and/or replacement ary sewers.____________ •B within 350* (you can obtain ; of Finance A-603 Government addressed to each of the names posed contours) if land grades). f for requirements). e attach a separate list of > application. this application. Please Lf the above information has i Application is ccnnplete. Date L information required or ss to pay all fees and/or Lication, and certifies that t to the best of his/her Date is application and further by City staffr consultants, members for purposes of -Mi' V Date y offices 25 days before the on Meetings are held on the e present at all scheduled ouncil. If an applicant is ake arrangements to have an ise the Building & Zoning mmmm ■■ ■'/: ,-v.' .r. . A ■■m ■■■■ ■■.■:■■ : ■ -u : ' . - A . ■■ : ,' •:/.• • V . : . VVi/;; » h^hsal 8* 8S ■ im*. -4 M t» (L. -4 i m •< W* 3^ -a •< oi •»» X m re ► • •H 3B O re -n -4 w* m “ h asme* liillr-isPSfSIr* r* OSt.M e^io£-» X ^llp _35fe4_ # aa. -*| yi8*-8 i''2Ss*l ae **• t_, i •• # s a* a 5§|, »1 2 asli ^I K l*> M **4 I *3e i r* Mi Siw as y« 7 S yi SR ^ aai ai ASf o SrC» •S K s PI*:r*'£l I f c*=s S5 •y ias y* 7 8 “Sn »-4 M Z X Z 2 IP U in w sss I- M M r* >1 I M yi is i^2S 553 •4 I R» M M IR s»« s:si yi o -4 2 rj S' Oe -e!1»,11|i•y rmIS33S8 gSCIf2 a*Jlslsll «l r,^ft» # sai * •K IP a*: r* iR or 8 P§§8 re P* fg 2 8 E-<5{ ^28 N S>ae8 2 fy *p m m rs Pr-e.P ^ •*'• •4 U)> z *«,si•-4 E re ns O s4 1 IP >M rp 1 -s ^ «si 1 X S HI Cp SJPC P* pM S'",*p* p«2 6 R R «8 p* IP VP b ^ Isis S3 rs 4h as liltiMiliilp« « «l -«l il ••s^3 *0 i£|l?l» 8 M <P)114* al fp p' a a ^ S S Of fP R4 5- 8"®* _ IP •• *;s§ I VI -4 O ^S-xg W4 O 2 §3 ► 5 >4 Ire IP 8 O *e H tn re Q r*i o n ‘I #xJ' ^ ^ /I •eIIVI es p8 SIr1882^KSrM yi 8 I ! 2S2S Es?*2«535| re 5 • 1S8»51^82 m ?Sip-, ? 'Xto P> q-«I2•Sss » 2 C ^ i^p *‘5seS *« & 4 5c3&A & z W’ •' •4 re re Ron 3||8 SI I re yi f S 2*‘5® H •» ^5°re 3S !S I .« <» R- W s4 Oj* 2 ^ ee > *,1 m t SgS r- C s4 m Z I a re #e w4 «« «K8 P/.; - ■.*»• m 'W M X l! i *-4 IP -4 M «4 Ml -4s 31I gs 10 Mt•- s O kM t O V-^r ■; f"' - •;■•■.•••' v;.-.-.. .: . .r ■ _ ■i"'- ■;.y ;-V- i mm.■••.;•:=. p!■■•‘a W■.-'iI'■3li ■:U •■ ■•; mm s:m i nn 1 ; vy- •■■ .X ; W,;: .y-- c i H -f,\Mm^:mAmA ■■:/' .'■ ■‘i'J .g:-,.;' ',#E!Sia; 2: ■ wit II-f •• •• •• ■; • -•/. •■• * ys'mmm ''^y:;y?,v:- I f,' V y '-4,. "y •-■"> v':': > A'M 1 iisiM M i ■•■ ■ V vaiamtf ost urPresent Zoning District Present Use of Property See attached 1/a Section naps_ _ _ ResidentialOther (specify)DBSCmimOB OF RBQOBST®**c*"ibe request in uetailt Request construction and/or replacowent of existing sewage lift stations and sanitary sew^-rt.. ^ ■ II II ■ . . . . . . . . . .I I II HrZRBD S0BI«1*'^AL8 ** Ccnpleted Application Fons. ^**^^^^^**^ Property Ovners List of owners within 350' (yon can obtain this list fro* Hennepin County Departnent of Finance A-SOJ Governisent Center 348-3271) Steeped, legal sized envel^»ea (fio) pro—addressed to each of the nanes on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for reoi Ircsienta). Pl*t Map. As an addendue to this application, please attach a aepaiate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Proparty (Twner must sign thia application. Plaase remember that your application is not complete if the above information ha® not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICAirr*8 6ICTATDRS The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OH11BRS SIGHATURB The owner hereoy acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an advise the Building & ZoningOrrice of tnis change prior to the meeting. -. ft- r*r •*. ,-j^^ ..'■■■ *»;••■'■V ^:-: ! . ■; :m Jing of existing dry well end >8. Portion of the valve vault Lll have the hatch at 6* above at the present dry well height sting grade. Per site plan, the adjacent area to lessen ^as just advised that they have e Control Commission's permit 1 control plans. In the City's le City conditioned approval on onstruction. We would suggest Lon and Planning Commission may aled for Council action until to any of the neighbors in garding each of the individual ditions or amendments to the trol during the process, staff ssion wishes any other items tact prior to the meeting. Lonal use permits and variances 3l Conunission finding that all )) have been satisfied and such f the plans for each specific i be tabled until the City is in Ians for the project before i::R5wg::u®i ;-rv:=v.;: - • -•vr flease check one • Property i-' 4a# /jhi y ' ■ /T> fTS i.. .vw ocm OF 0X000 CTSERAL UUIOt 05B APPUCA PXOPgXTf LOCATIOHSite Address CQUifnr SOAPS 51 k 19 (See attachments)_ _ _ _ _ _ Property identification Number (P.I.D.) Se* attached surveys abstract or torrens? (for Cmtditional Use Applicatimis only) * m l^iease attach legal description to applicaticm if not included on required survey. AVPiircAaT Metropolitan Waste Control Cossaission Metro Square Sldg. Phone (hoM) W--Hi Phone (work) 412^222-8423 Address 7th i Robert Streets City St. Paul Up 55101 aiSiP-- Wasta See attached surveys Addresa Phone City *iP. Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (month/year) 1 (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. wp m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm dsa 0^ mmmmmmmm mm mm^tm mm mm mm mmmm^mm^mm^mmm mm^m^^mt^mtm ^mmmm^m^ mm mm mm mmmmmmmm - COHDITIOHAL OSB PBlMITS - Penewal Fee - 1/2 Current Pee After-the-Pact Pee - Double Current Application Pee $100.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) $200.00 f) Institutional (church, school, etc.) Duplex Credit/Bldg Ccsnmercial/Xndustrial Use Land Alteration «—• 'Grading and filling > designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule APPLICATIOIIS $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (•<• consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals .py'm other - see fee schedule ii iiif ill iiliilillitiiiiiiimMA V ,V.; ,■ .-/■■ ■•:'• ■" :•• ■.' ■./ ^■mm•* v-i :■ - v; I be to assure that appropriate luring the installation of the Lne and other areas during the rn sent to all neighbors of the ift stations installed. We wish roposed design of the structures While disturbed areas will >f the lift station upgrade will , The only structure to remain ity has no information as to the to be used based on the current to comment on this. south of the existing Maxwell Bay ht-of-way. The new installation at grade for the valve vault and inel above grade. ;o screen this from the marina ithin the Hennepin County access located withir County property b11 and valve vault typical of appears at grade level. Again rfould be set at grade level, ithin this site plan. Planning sting lift station, abandoning a ng it with a new valve vault and be above grade. The hatches for about six inches above existing is also proposed because of the yy^y jiiimla ii I i , te-A; % Immpi VVA.^ 4 u N rnmmm' I / •.S:V-V. Mm •;. . * r m:^^‘yy’y^:-y-:* y^yy::iyym Sdfiing Pile #1254 March 15, IfBii Page 4 of 4 [Lift Station Wo. 45 - Exhibits BE t CC Wo major changes proposed, just upgrading of existing dry well and vault, replacing sian>holes with the hatch tops. Portion of the valve vault will remain at present height. Wet well will have the hatch at 4 above existing grade the valve vault will remain at the present dry well height which appears to be about 2-3* above existing grada. Per site plan, landscaping appears to be proposed wittiio the adjacent area to lessen impect of axisting lift atation. The Minnehaha Crash Watershed District has just advisad that they have tablad tha raview of the Metropolitan Waste Control Comaisaion's permit application pending receipt of final eroeion control plana. In the City’s recent review of County Woad 15 upgrading, the City conditioned approval on «rc^iofi control plans prior to constructioiie We trculd suggest that we do not delay action on thia application and Planning Commission **y auggest that the application not be scheduled for Council action until staff has reviewed the final erosion plans. Staff would advise that we listen to any of the neighbors in attendance that have any specific concerns regarding each of the individual lift station locations and ask for any additions or amendments to the proposed plan that sppssr rsssonsblse Outside of the much needed erosion control during the process, staff has no other concerns. If Planning Commission wishes any other items reviewed or added to this review, please contact prior to the meeting. Staff n:ecnmaarndstlcai - To recommend the approval of the conditional use permits and variances application of the Metropolitan Waste Control Comialsslon finding that all standards of Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D) have been satisfie^d and such approval to include any amendment to any of the plans for each specific lift station and to ask that the application be tabled until the City is in receipt of the final erosion control plans for the project before scheduling for Council action. Y<<w*ip wm.v/. .■ ; ••>nM£i'- blic information meeting for oposed upgrading of the e hearing was to advise the to advise of the proposed ult of the improvesient. The baff's opinion that many of at the public hearings for d for tonight’s meeting. We itive to answer any of the will commence sometime in Spring Park. The project is by for the cities of Orono, it the overflow of untreated . 1 take place in two phases, mer and fall of 1988 will lepin County Road 84) as well between Old Crystal Bay Road 9 and 51). During Phase 1 Point Road and Baldur Park months. Detours will be >ring and summer of 1989 and etween North Shore Drive and view Road. During Phase II r»* Drive and Fagerness Point ice again, detours will be ibit Q-2 for exact locations ie not only the installation elude the major upgrading of n No. 43, 46 and 49 will be ur Park and Lift Station No. rith new Lift Station No. 44, Lift Station No. 45 located ty owners within 150' of the 1 within 75' of the lakeshore, ;he 5 lift stations, 3 are stallations adjacent to the . Review Exhibits P through as adjacent to all the lift Idhilig Pile I125& March 15, 1988 Page 1 of 4 The pnrpoae of the City's review will he to assure that appropriate erosion control measares will be taken daring the installation of the piping within the 75’ setback of shoreline and other areas during the stages of construction. Notices have been sent to all neighbors of the lift stations to eittier be altered or new lift stations installed. We wish to advise all property owners as to the proposed design of the structures to be insta 1 led. Meview of the ledivideal Lift Stati Lift Station No. 43 -> Exhibits T 4 U Alteration of existing lift station. While disturbed areas will receive fill and be aoddad, the mejority of the lift etetion upgrade will be replaced with two grade*level hatchea. The only structure to remain above grade will be a control panel. The City has no information at to the haight or dimensions of the control panel to be used based on the current information. The Engineer ahtmld be able to comment on this. Lift Station Mo. 44 - Exhibits V fc w This new installation will be to the south of the existing Maxwell Bay Marina located within the County road right-of-way. 'ttie new installation will consist once again of two hatch areas at grade for the valve vault and the wet well and there will be a control panel above grade. Extensive plantings are proposed to screen this from the marina custoawrs and fr<^ the adjacent roadway. Lift Station No. 45 - Exhibits X 4 Y This is the other new installation within the Hennepin County access off of North Shore. Once again, this is located within County property Involving the installation of the wet well and valve vault typical of previous installations where only a hatch appears at grade level. Again there will be a control panel that would be set at grade level. Landscaping does not appea'' to be shown within this site plan. Planning Commission may wish to on this. Lift Station No. 46 - Exhi. Z 4 AA This involves the upgrading of an existing lift station, abandoning a former dry wel 1 and a wet well and replacing it with a new valve vault and wet well. Once again a control panel will be above grade. The hatches for the valve vault and the wet well will be about six inches above existing grade. Review the site plan, landscaping is also proposed because of the proximity of the adjacent home. ing Adiainistrator L Comnission *■ County Road 64, 51 Variance! - Public Hearing (cavation within 75 feet of the Itional ttse permit required for aed 2/23/07 (review Exhibit P) - all lift itatlong pot approved Conditional Use Permit/Varlanc® Jse Permit/Variance 0-75' Conditional Use Permit/Variance Jae Permit/Variance 0-75' ;>erty Owners List t Map ?erty Owners List t Map ?erty Owners List t Map perty Owners List t Map perty Owners List b Map ^ Improvement Area Bct Scope n 3 (D) amended 2/23/87 ign Plans Ign Plans ign Plans ign Plans sign Plans toning Pile 11256 March 15. 1966 2 of 4 ■eview of Afiplicatioii - (» March 7th, If§6. the M.W.C.C. held a public information meeting for all property owners affected by the proposed upgrading of the H.V.C.C./OroBO interceptor. The purpose of the hearing was to advise the public of the extert of the improvement and to advise of the proposed sections of road that would be closed as a result of the improvement. The meeting was very poorly attended and it is staff's opinion that many of these property owners will be in attendance at the public hearings for cooditional use persits and variances scheduled for tonight's meeting. We have asked the M.W.C.C. to send a representative to answer any of the technical questions that smy arise. The Orono interceptor/sewer improvement will commence sometime in August of 1968 within the cities of Orono and Spring Park. The project is designed to provide additional sewer capacity for the cities of Orono, Spring Park and Minr.etonka Beach and to prevent the overflow of untreated sewage into Lake Minnetonka. Construction will teks place in two phases. Phase I conetruc-i*. n scheduled for late summer and fall of 1966 will Include e segment of Cld Crystal Bay Road (Hennepin County Road 64) aa well as Worth Shore Drive (Hennepin County Road 51) between old Crystal Bey Road and Ehadywood Road (Hennepin County Roads 19 end 51). During Phase I construction, worth Shore Drive between Bohn's Point Road and Beldur Park Road is expected to be closed for several months. Detours will be coordinated with t)ie city of Orono. Phase II construction is sclieduled for spring end summer of 1989 and will include areas adjacent to Shedywood Road between North Shore Drive and Worthview Road as well as a segment of Northview Road. During Phase II construction, Shedywood Road between North Shore Drive and Pagerness Point Road will be closed for several weelcs. Once again, detours will be coordinated with the City of Orono. Review Exhibit Q-2 for exact locations of the areas of roads to be closed. Review Exhibit P, the project will include not only the Installation of larger sized sewer piping, but will also include the major upgrading of lift stations within the City. Lift Station No. 43, 46 and 49 will be upgraded. Former Lift Station No. 44 on Baldur Park and Lift Station No. 45 at Pagerness Point Road will be replaced with new Lift Station No. 44, adjacent to the Maxwell Bay Marina and new Lift Station No. 45 located within the Hennepin County public access. The notices have been sent to all property owners within 150' of the areas of piping that will be laid or installed within 75' of the lakeshore, please review Exhibits B through E. Of tho 5 lift stations, 3 are scheduled for major upgrading and 2 as new installations adjacent to the Maxwell Bay Marina and Hennepin County access. Review Exhibits F through 0, these designate the 350' notification areas adjacent to all the lift stations. ' * 1m:m mm \ o ^3 2^5s > mo.« . ' IgoQg o . —i ^ «3 X O i ”Ti rt O 5 :o -.O 15 3 Sis . V;, ■ >'^-’ ■ :. V-ikir <1:>.Piaiuilo? CoMRltaiofi Chaiman Rallay OrofK? Planning CoMiaaicm Manbair* City Adtaiinlatrator Rarnhardaoni ^aanna A. ttalMiatht Suildin^ a toning Matlnistrator iiarch 15. Iftt I125C Natropoliian Vast# Control CoMiiaaion <■» County Road t4, 51 and 19 - Conditional Uaa Paniita/Varlanca* Publlo Haarln^ Saction 10.22, Sttbdiviaion 2 <* Ho aBcavatloii within 75 faat of the laka without variaeca ai^oval. Saction 10.03, fabdlwialoa It * Conditional oae parait raquirad for land altaraticna. Saction 10.20, 8«bdiviai«i 3 (D) aiMmlad l/2J/i7 (raviaw Exhibit P) - Conditional oat parnit raquirad for all lift atationg got approvad with public iaf)r©vanant plang by City. Mat of lidiibita Exhibit A - Exhibit • o Exhibit C - Exhibit D > E F G J K L M N 0 Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit P Exhibit Q Q1 Q2 Exhibit R Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit BB Exhibit CC Application Proparty (bmars List for Conditional Oaa Pamlt/Varianca 0-75‘ Plat Map for Conditional Uaa Pamit/Varianca 0-75* Proparty Ownars List for CMtditional Uaa Penit/Varlance 0-75* Plat Map for Conditional Uaa Permit/Variance 0-75* Lift Station No. 43 Lift Station No. 43 Lift Station No. 44 Lift Station No. 44 Lift Station No. Lift Station No. Lift Station No. Lift Station No. Lift Station No. Lift Station No. 45 45 46 46 49 49 Property owners List Plat Map Property Owners Lift Plat Map Property Owners List Plat Map Property Owners List Plat Map Property Owners List S - T ’ U < V ■ w X yz AA Plat Map Comprehensive Site Plan of Improvement Area Lynch Letter Dated 3/7/88 Engineer's Sketch of Project Scope Road Closures Map DNR Letter Dated 3/11/88 Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D) amended 2/23/8? Lift Station No. 43 Site Plan Lift Station No. Site Plan Lift Station No. Site Plan Lift Station No. 44 45 46 Design Plans Design Plans Design Plans Design Plans Site Plan Lift Station No. 49 - Design Plans Site Plan V. • i ■0..: ^ ■' 'v'- • '' ■im ■iSi tA-" ■ ■:« Xy ■-’■■I ■ -'/Asti mmMfi A- 'yv- . . •• T‘ & K- ^ ■. ^ “ t; :rw?]:f:,,-,. 0 o>•s r' Ik 4 !•5-^ «0 1 * m ■ vi •. "•/■ Z:'. ;r>s':;/-f =«■?* ■»iapw tei,•■-..'•. -if.- m\■ ■ ;■ .^^,;.:;.:V.i:r :^l tV.'V.,' '■■■■'T3 i^i' rm ; • ■•• =A-" ■ • ■ •> ■s ■:M '.-i ■ ■Hi . . ■:• ' ■v:'•:Al ■;’l ■ <■: •• ‘ '-ti■ic2 ir m:*y. m i* \ V ,-_ -i - '«• T- ■' 4 ■ ■ ^ ••V- •* .V;.:: ■••:■ :••> ■ ^ ■..,: t Blvd iving on rg. This o Golvgd perty when A V'4^, ■y -: :-,i(■::‘Z'd^*!:«■ 'M. V’;'^: ^V : ■X^V :,.^ [ t'V'^^\; ■ ■\--i. !u ,.:. :■;;■■ v ■mm • -■ V •'•' •'• ■! ’ V - S' • VVjiRAl RiSOURCES, MN 55106 rUTBOL COKKISSION 1785 COKCORDIA SfHEET kTION OF ROAD our rovlAif on the abovi ppllcation follow. tat ie mainly a concern of ;ers will have a chance to aa procedure. Preliminary d waters will be minimal I existing roadway. , 1988. the Ehlcrc housa .0* elevation. Slnca the the City of Orono's Flood ar flood elevation, we have oweve^ that the Minnehaha alevatlon.) ng the southeast shore of ters concerns.£7 6 mmi ■ .;• -y- m •< ••=>■ :■ vL7i:^i v^, ■-•'•: rv\'. - B:mr^ . ■. ■:.■ I -;•..-i.. • ' •• -.V • . ■• ..V.. vV...V •m-m'" - -'mm m- ^ -c.;> :•: f/:- 's v-A-vi-^ :• MM'mmmmi WmB m v'v ' . ' •;. ■••: . . • .<m.- p«j£- ’mmm ifS .. . ■ :'■ •• =: l.m. V ..iiSiiiw. 5-'■■■■'■■ .-i'...rj SS^P mm: KiL.:m44 v? :-V'v;:-•t-. "v>'4 ■■‘g mm .:4 ,p;' - ••••.•■■ Ir^ :• :rw . ■•. i s ' •• ^ r 1*:^ V. •iV.''v'-:-i =r. i i-: .V. -■ i ■]:::: < ’■ . - MBim ^ ^ W.'Wtxi 'mm: ¥f:. i-B n? £.Ik ,.• •' - t. mm ■iHM’.V‘ ;••*•..•• :.....♦• ’. V * ■••'':.■■ '■::(■ ■ ■ V,. V ■-£S':u;£ v::v£;v'f;££^ ; V ':: Karch 10, IW ClomifKi of foroml. §lvii. At this tiawi 1 oust c^Joct to tha> closanQ of Foromt lilvd iMcaueo It could larMl-lock siy |»ro|»ofty. In 1^72 Orono clomod Oak riace» so that I aa oom driving ce^ |KV{Herty bolonglfWg to fotir dlffarant proporty oemars. Thin Man dono without notlfylrtg aw. Thin probloa a»u-5t bo nolvapd! twforo Foront Blvd cdm bo closed. I would liko Foremt l^lvd clonaed In front of ay property when thin problM i« molyod. f^!0 foRe%T 13 W i'.." • j/: r iyi. ■4yf k .-ir , V-';/m.ymymy'-:..- •'.; y ■ %." •'-■ y £ ■,, •» V, ':■•■ ■ ^ - ■■ ■ ^i£:; mm m■ - • ■ .:• ; ;V ■ -i' .\- •VI riTiit ft ftwmm W Ar.oan. ftr. Pf.Micnaff C ' ynKfi. Ptrtft.itmm • (dMand. Pt1.Ftfwif^ i P Anttrnon. PtffPHP A •arsimann. PiF..sni I Mv Afarw*. rf •otsn c ausM*. A i A4, f4 Thewngg i Angut, PM►. n.Homma A Saaiosd. P.fL CflVlK A VkM wm Uo M riwwtiiHy M (ManI MA Sa^ i\) f' *r of portions of Forest r place city utilities on of the property to be 36-4600 r 3|PlfSiSKl ■ ' ■*., vV ;.:■ 4- -'^ V-;'- • 'W’. ■ Mi- ■;• . ,• ..-'> -•c- • ‘.-•A ■: ■m3 p;9;S-: :s vv • - ■.- ■■PMJmm: iu :< ;r.,V : .!• M. :.r'-- ;• .. r--.'- •-:• ■•.•. . Wmmmim .'> : ■ ^ ''' .jii.■^5 ■ •• ■ -^•|..- 'u.y 'V.' :svAfi or^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAl RESOURClS1200 iAUm ICAO. ST. TAEI. HI 55100 nklNOtlUrcli 11. ItSS Jitarm A. Hiftutli •viUlBt 4 t«aiot iAilnlrttstar ciTT or oaoao r««t offic* Ira 04 Crystal A«y. m 55325 HWMSM tt> AmiCATioa #1254 vFnafoLitm visa octneii coratugira iTxoiuL o« rmiT/fAAiAaai AmiCATlOa #1254 .»!1S 4 KAm HUXT. 1745 CCMCOiDIA STfUf AmiCATIOB #1251 ADDUT 5CBU1.TX - TACATI(»F Of IfiAO D«ar Ha. MabtutO: ... Thank yra for ■tsdiat laforBatlea for «ir rcirlra o» th« rafamcad parmlta. Oar coanaBta cai aach aprUeatloo fellow. ahewa .=. The optroding anl raalacraaat of aewtr llaaa la ulnly a coaeam of the IMII Lands B«ra«t. Tha PlvlaioQ of Vatars will hava a chaaca to cooBMnt through the Bursae of Laitda llcanaa proeaduxa. Prallmlaary Indlcstloas are that lapacts to pretsctsd waters will ha mlBjwal bacaiiaa tha saasr line is aostly heaaath tbs existing roadray. According to the plans rscalvad March 3. 1955, the Ehlsrt house addition doss not encroach below the 931.0* elevation. Since the Flood Insurance late Map (enclosed) and the City of Orono'e Flood Ordinance consider elevation 931 the 100 year flood elevation, we have no floodplain concerns. (Ve understand howevs^ that the Minnehaha L Creak VSO uses 931.5 as the 100 year flood elevation.) The application for vacation of roads along the southeast shore Forest Lake does not raise sny protected waters concerns. %: M Thank you again for the opportunity to review these projects. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely. T(^ Hovey Staff Hydrologist METRO REGION DIVISION OF HATERS Enclosure cc: Jack Anderson Jl/dv AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ■:■■ :k-. : . ,;v:1, >1;^ „i ■ t-t: ^ V mmm t-WS£ * **M ■>v-^ ^ t~: '■••■ ;■ V.-k--. '■}• ■i M .. ........ ...5■■ ',It. . .. M- ,•.•••' K-.; ' -f ■ ■■ f; •• A- m. ✓^ ' mm0m P • •-:■■■:■■ ::^- •? v^." on0 ited in thd plat of bvaan tha Northwastarly 1, Block 1, SIDWELL ADD Line of said Lot 1. :ated in the plat of tween the Northwesterly Bterly lines of Lot 8, Lcated in the plat of tween the Northwesterly 1, Block 15, "Saga Hill the Northeasterly line Lcated in the plat of Btween the Northwesterly 16, Block 6, "Saga Hill I of the Southwesterly idicated in the plat of I tween the Northwesterly 9, Block 15, "Saga Hill of the Southwesterly line c as dedicated in the plat j between the Northwesterly ^ot 2, Block 16, "Saga )rtion of the Northeasterly idicated in the plat of :ween the Northwesterly 15, Block 6, "Saga Hill \o of Lot 13, said Block 6. rated in the plat of :ween the Northwesterly jrtheasterly line of Lot i of the Southwesterly lino iedicated in the plat of atween the Northwesterly 3, Block 15, "Saga Hill lo of Lot 2, said Block 15. at■ m'%^' 7 • • • ^ • *3: V'. i*aiisiis mmm s5>. . Mm. 3 r~' S wm ililiiiV ■"••■■’./= •• 'Vr-i•3-■■■Bonestree Rdsene AnefertSe a AssociatestwQfcwri A AnMiKtt CIc• < 1 1 sI 4.m tmNM bf PSr ft ft ft ft ftm RafcH 7, 19ta City of Oremo liox Crystal iayp m 533J3 Attn; Ms. Jcmm Itebisstti lie; AyylicatiM Bo. 1251 « Aarfrey Sct^lts Our riU Bo. 139-1251 IDear Jeanne: ffe Bare reviewed eailattrifii cimetma for the vacation of port Iona of forast loultYard* Thera is m Intent ts ecnatmet a street or piece city utilities irithla Forest loulersrd. We therefore find the rscstlon of the property to he scceptshlt. \Qnt9 eery truly, iOWSTtOO. lOitBl, AFfDfltrS l AgSOClATfi, IBC. Michael C. Lynch MCL:df 8181f 23J5 yg/fA Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SS:!? • 612-636-4600 ■■X\:0T- M ........... • .33. V .-.3 : . V . • ;:,3v^: ■ •: ■ •: 33-|^33/.33 33. Ifeiitsaisai A- ^ I- ■^V'=1.33.’’-:A-V ./33 "A/A A' -3',;f3 ■•• 3 -A:'33'. ;A. 3 3A3-;;AA:,3^'.A? ^3w: . ^ < : t ■3.,i'^.'-3. B^P:JA3;: aI^‘ \33\,Si3::. ;;al 3: *3- :^'.ic :A3A3^ mimim ''■m •;•;. . ■•v»-- ■•* :*•'.• •• * tiii,.. fes ■■;' --cr^:- '-■■ ■ : ■■•■m/Q0-# i Q (rr *1[i ^ 4 GHONBtRO, INC- A TAMM«*C«PtbrMry 24» IMi la th« plat Qf atiott dNwcriptioaa That part of vacatad Tormmt ftMlavard aa dadicatad ^viaad. Haonapia Co, lUiw * which liaa tatwaan tha Nortitwstarly axtaialoM aeroaa it of tha Southnaaatarly Una of Lot 1, Block 1, SIWTUL 1‘5‘XOa, arid tha iiMitiarly portion of tha Borthaaatarly Una of aaid Lot 1, p^t of vacatad foroit Boulavard aa dadicatad in tha plat of •Saga Mill Baviaau, Hat nap in Co, Wnn.- vhlch liaa batwam tl*a Morthwaatarly axtaMiona acroaa it of tha Southwatarly and Morthaaatarly UnM of Lot a. Block Mill Raviaad, Hannapin Co. Hlnn.* g-tEkRER That part of vacatad Foraat Boulavard as dadicatad in tha plat of •S^a Mill Eevisad. Hannapin Co. Minn.* which lias batwaan tha Morthwaatarly axtanslcms acrosa it of tha Southwastarly lina of Lot 1* Block 15, *Saga Mill Aavisad» ^nnapin Co. Mian.* aki tha straignt part of tha Morthaastarly Una of said Lot I• That part of Vacatad Forast Soulavard aa dadicatad in tha plat of •Saga Hill Ravisad, Hannapin Co. Minn.- which liaa batwaan tha Northwaatarly axtansions across it of tha f^rthaasterly Una of Lot 16, Block 6, -Saga Mill Ravxsad, Hannapin Co. Minn.* and tha straight portion of tha Southwastarly Una of said Lot 16. LUDINGTCh’ That part of vacatad Forest Boulevard as dadicatad in the plat of -Saga Hill Ravisad, hannapin Co. Minn.* which lies batvaan tha North 'c*Jterly axtansicms across it of tha Northeasterly lira of Lot 9, Block 15, *Saga Hill Bavisad, Hannapin Co. Minn.* and tha straigYtt portion of tha Southwesterly Una Qf said Lot 9. That part of vacatad Vine Place and vacated Park as dedicated in tha plat of *Saga Hill Revised, Hannapin Co. Minn." which lias between the Northwesterly axtensiona across them of the Southwesterly lina of Lot 2, Block 16, 'Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn.* and tha straight portion of tha Northeasterly line of Lot 1, said Block 16. That part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat ofFAIRBANKS -Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn.* which lies between th© Northwesterly extensions across it of the Southwesterly line of Lot 15, Block 6, -Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn." and the Northeasterly lino of Lot 13, said Block 6. NEWTON That part of vacated Forest Boulevard aa dedicated in the plat of -Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn.- which lies between the Northwesterly extensions across it of tha Westerly portion of the Northeasterly line of Lot 2, Block 1, SIDWELL ADDITION, and the Westerly portion of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2. DERTAGNOLI That part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of -Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn.- which lies between the Northwesterly extensions across it of the Southwesterly line of Lot 3, Block 15, "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co. Minn.- and the Northeasterly line of Lot 2, said Block IS. mmm ■m»-; ; =v:^=.•.r..• -Mi-"-•^V: v'::'yr■■^ f:.: -V.;. ■/II i",isf®Hfa"m fSI955III-<3 E S I S\ -<1*1 B S A lpfcS:V-'iiit'- ^2 8w > >vf ^ *-4 m'^228. “no >1 M Ml I ► ► _ fciillii • •• ••• ;..' :•:• • *4 L-n- :f.K: V *"•S:*:■:«1“ - .. S;MIfelii'’wm^omss siosmuB i oJil rv o 1 IIS s:.ssss;:ss-^•s -. ;,v'TEE KEBEBT JOMQKIZDGES JttC BQCES TO THIS APPLlOfflCIl M© RlTTOEBl £umoRixB& urrpar onto ike ffCfBRPf bt citt stmt, casJLTMifs, M39fIS, CntOSSMI MMEK, AHD CXX»OL ME3COS F» PUTOOEES OT S?.*SBTiaWTCXI »D VERinCMnCB or THIS RBQUi^T. •::li CMOtS SlCNKnJBC GATS T- ^y/^a/tAj / 3 S'S' /^vA. ,0v, Hiio a^cJ' jly0ic~j^ify£L<J I SSI Pa/dc {ho '^/P^ ^ < ynNo<J 7-;/^ 3^S/SV •/ Hor P^rk Pr. AV. SSSk'\^mi p - #.-r. .-r '-'V /39f he, Z^tacfAj^^ rvijO, /^/53 f SS3^f Mi»3 jji /y/3 SP0yi4^.^ /3CiT '^',S'Jc*.i mm I ,• Ps^:*\ -.:P)^ >;i te-%' t.,.P:m JI- f-. '■■ . ■■ ■■■ .J ■".;I r-: •■/:■■ .:■• .i -vss'.' .Svr:.-. ;:Stys-. \ • /.: • V. V .-_ SI>•••>. V:!rS . : ... ... • .• , . • . • .i i ..•. *. • •=>'*■ -immmy-!:^X ..;::5*^ ^ . * »im\H IIMMji“--ssI._ _ _*1•- #«• ff*IIImm ^*i|i|f8l»*ii*i:8V ! l»i: I "?*28yt k0»^m i0t*- a ^ a:S8r |»3S •iin imfmmm ilsi 9 I*Sf S 9 m K2»S 6i ta 5*828 J=2?28 ^ «M «M M *« m n wm m m il-* inm i^n ^ s*ip3 f 88 ♦mmm ; i t -Ji|2-ii** j!>5 a a 2 « miifWZ m -4-4 M ■» XM'nm . '..aFliMi=ii Ifl?fe'iSi:"•**28 *155,-Mn|3 1® ■c n 8Iw *«9mti Z' S <4•sJ I i:;fi2s *1 ” ^* •» s -w •- siigl481 M ii n S 8•s I 8i 18 y I *i i** *ls- s 5 ^ « M n « »* 5 i!8» SJUS, gl S ra ^ S fit r mg'^*-4 S #« ► •-* s s 8 . ••._•.• • .• •. :; V .: ^. :,„. • ■ •. • ■:i-ig!| « |£|||«asj* 9 i I 88 f Uz*!s I-■S 28 8 ifi i 8-« ,8 .,Sq 5iE:a3 *»S*s- S'* » C 8 -•S2Suogfy^ «» *4 m VI H S 14 li T O T(i . j i «4S 28M•3at»8 ! iisrill; sh I 3 8 5 3 R 2 8 “faS-j ? •* « 7* a?H \ VI _ . -m M w 14 a 3 8SSsa» Ss 8 e * 18 «l M S I ill**III: ! ie » pS?g53 8rss I- 8!:Qnn 3I* TJ M 14I 1i j* ■'•.^^^ Vo ;.vr - ■ ••^. ■ =..•> ;-.a; •'■■;<i [•■ -• , 41 r- ■ '-Art,, ■ • :lon. Pleasa nformation has La complete. 1 required or . fees and/or certifies that t of'his/her S'''/' >n and further r consultants* purposes of ays before the re .held on the all scheduled and* if an please make and to advise mmm ■■ 'Ai ■ ■■' ■■■ "••••■? ‘ V'••V Vac'd cP/.^u/?^77-*-l1 • \ *. abstract or torrans? plication i£ not includad on ne (hoHn) 5ne (work) ty O.kS-'^U)21d ine '(home) >ne :ity.zip (mbnth/year) reels of land. y Use h, school# etc.) 1 Use lling - 101 cu. yd. or more ning walls within 75' o£ lew (+ consultant fees) Subdivision >r'. ; ......a>iaag’'sii»&sa ■vic=t±ja Mi iWftaisi !T V ,;•';^ •■; •• \A-aHetw'*'- • •••• w ■'• v-ii ryi *//" . .. ?.3 .i.^^BiT USB OP ntopmarr - ^ ^Present Zoning District _ _ _Z^"/&Present Use of Pr<H>erty ^Ittsipential ^tHer (specify) BBCSZmOR OP 1SQOB8T Describe request in detal lt l6 ugolUED somraa g Coag>leted Application Pom. Property Owners tiet of owners within J50' (you can obtain this list frM Hennepin County Department of Finance A-403 Government C«rnt«r 341-^3271) Staeped* legal sited envelopes (110) pre'^addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. , 'Certificate of survey. 5-—OaiisLiUL'tion plan, if applicabre.j The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please not^bMn Includ^^ application is iH>t OCTrplate 1£ tho abova Information haa Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application ia completa. Zoning Officials Signature __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ p^to ' •V ' ■■■•■• •'v: I- • ■ ! APFLI(!A1IT'S SIGHATDKB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or »«»'*.*V*** Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses Incurred in rev'* of this application, and certifies that tne information supplied ia true and correct to tha best of'his/her jcnowleogoe Applicant's signature ///C/Date ^ : ■ ■■ V mt: OWBKRS sigbaturb ^ acknowledges and agrees to this application and further reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, conaultanta, •gents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this requests ^ Owner's signature *. Applicant must have all sulDmittals into the City offices 25 days before the <J>mmisslon Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the tnira Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Conuniaaion anc Council, and, if applicant is unable to attend an ^ arrangements to have an authorized please make the Bui lain, . tonin/t’'°“t'h.‘'‘;eVt‘n"/. - - KSliiRfSiini;i*-^ "fv: ••'='^-, ' /V -r.ic It*nM:: ^;■■ ia mm: '5-^v ':ed wetlands within the subject le Place and the park of Saga purpose and no future public ibits Installation ol Forest martial vacations as proposed, d for Council's formal action. :he present application, staff affected property owners have t Boulevard is proposed, then resolved prior to scheduling ... ^ V•vi^: i.- ■■ •r-.-. -'v 'f"iMi *• ;:• ■•<: c- ■■.:> i^vv ■ ' < .. • •■ • . .•>. t mmmmmmmm *':. v^.-- r<:;- ■,* •; \ .V; ' •■ 5- « is. ■' ’' ■' *■'■ y’ ■''! ^ / ^c>yyy-i ■ "bm ,#;• '•■■ *#1251 ie*d J/fi'/PiIp *»®RiciTT or oaoBOAprucano*|x.v ■; ;.s 't; flOWPITf LOCATIOii Site Address -^vj/ 0iy/{^. property identification Runber (P.'l.D.) Please check one *> Is the property ebetrect or (for Conditi<mal Use Appllcatione only) torrensT Please attach legal description to eppliceiion if not included on required survey. *W¥nam kasM __ Address Phone (hoe^) Ptwme (work)-t> ^yd CIMMkP (if different than applicant) « name Phone (heme) Phone «• ^ • Address V ... * t ^Date Property Acquired an 1 (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land 1 IBA 41^4^ dmp 41^ dHB 41^41^ <■» •• dBP 41^ 4HP dHi «l^ 9- • •"* ** - COI^mOIIAL U81 PKUaTS ' $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) ' e - __ _ _ $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Conmercial/Industrial Use ^200.00 f) Xiand Alteration T,- :u Grading ahd filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID -* see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (♦ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning * ; Appeals$200.00 Other - see fee schedule i'" '.■■/••. / •.: V' .; :.:.^ :•' ;>; • ;■ ; ■ >■ m ^5. .V :■■•■plication with the City Attorney's em with vacating portions of the Iking for a total vacation. The tute does not establish standards bhe City could approve the partial total vacation of Forest Boulevard and create less problens in the J by the City. (Exhibit H), clearly this current r Mr. Nelson. Reviw.. Exhibit Bison's property is via unimproved e was vacated, the access to Lot 3 ce right-of-way. Nelson was not It is interesting to note that in 16, that sought a variance for the this issue was not raised, as part le difficult access via the current le current application is approved ve to be resolved via other means. B of action involving the present ition. >n but include Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and i by the Planning Commission until c owners - we do not want to create ir. Nelson in the previous vacation Bvard, Vine Place and the park of hen recommend that we once again al in order to contact each of the slve any access problems that may .e that portion of Buff Street or corridors to the lakeshore as fire revicus vacations. the proposed vacation based on the on of the shoreline of Forest Lake Id prohibit road construction. !8 within the subject area nor are rea in the future. -v.Vj v;• ... . w- mym v,-.-m'"■■V .. •••■m iitoeing File tl2)i Nereh 1«, 19M Fege 3 of 13. There are m» drsinagewayt ©r protected wetlsnds within the subject sres.4. The sress of Forest Boolevard, vine Flsce sad the park of Saga Hill Revised serve no current public purpose andl no future public purpose or need. 5. The vacation of Forest AveAje prohibits installatiori of Forest •oelevard as a through road. If Planning CoMsission reeoa —nds the partial vacations as proposed, the applicaticwi mey be acted on and preaented for Council's forsuil action. If Planning Commission wishes to expend on the present application, staff would suggest that we table action until a.l affected property o«mers have been contacted. If total vacation of Forest Boulevard ia proposed, then indeed problems such as Hr. Nelson's mutt be resolved prior to scheduling It before Council for final action. I *1' -i;'fo:'- zSt: -■■■,, ■ ii; 1};S Vj-: ■J " . -■ -‘'V-■•V - v/ . ^ ^ -: ^ ' '■ ■: ■ '.•• "4v:V.^ ■ • ing Administfato? >f Vine Place ft Forest Boulevard ration of Streets, Alleys, and Forest Boulevard, the reswinder iga Hill Revised, plat. rated Jt Boulevu’^d “ Lf cation of jlished the rec ion of Forest a park of the S' .nvolvino nine i 4, 5, 6, 7, and ; wish to be inc lired two legal Boulevard* the ga Hill Revised roperties. Staff , Block 15, Saga luded in current aintaining th« review Exhibit decision wo a connectinc lake that occt undeveloped or P. The vacation Id prohibit the ■hrough road not lies the majority 4 o 4* 4 T\ /y c catuf A If*l-inAA fExhibit K) si:.:.--. : -i: Xoaiag File ftiasi Karch 14, 19t8 Page 2 of )ii . •• ■ V-.: ■staff has reviewed the proposed applicatica with the City Attorney's office and asked if there was any problem with vacating portions of the onistproved right-of-way rather than asking for a total vacation. The Attorney's office advised that State Statute does not establish standards for partial or total vacations and that the City could approve the partial vacation of the applicants or indeed the total vacation of Forest Boulevard citing that it would be SKire efficient and create less problees in the future if the total vacation was approved by the City. Tn reviewing Mr. nelson's concern (Exhibit H), 'learly this current application would craate no problesi for Hr. Nalson. Eevi«.. Exhibit I, tachnically, the only legal accesa to Nelson'a proparty is via uniaproved Forest Boulevard. At tha tlsie Oak Placa was vacated, the access to Lot 3 was a privsta driveway within Oak Place right-of-way. Nelson was not granted easem'^nts prior to the vacation. It la interesting to note that in Hr. Helaon'a pt^vioua application in 191ft, that sought a variance for the Tonstruction of a detached garage, that this issue was not raised, as part that application did indeed involve the difficult access via the current driveway that serves the property. If the curren*" application is approved as proposed, Mr. Nelson's problem may have to be resolved via other meana. The City actually has three options of action involving th© prcevnt request for vacation, as followst 1. Approve the current partial vacation. 2. Approve also a partial vacation but include Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, Block 15 and table forsial action by the Planning Coamlaslon until staff is able to advise the specific owners - we do not want to create another problem as was created for Nr. Nelson in the previous vacation of Oak Place. 3. Total vacation of Forest Boulevard, Vine Place and the park of Saga Hill Revised. Staff would then recommend that we once again table action on the current proposal in order to contact each of the subject properties in order to resolve any access problems that may resuli. with the complete vacation. Note that the City will not vacatt that portion of Buff Street or Summit Avenue but would maintain the 50* corridors to the lakeshore as fire lanes. This action is consistent with previous vacations. Staff Reccmmiendatlon - Staff would recommend approval of the proposed vacation based on the following findings: 1. The steep topography and location of the shoreline of For within the platted right-of-way would prohibit road construct 2. There are no existing utilities within the subject area any utilities planned within this area in the future. r-_ mmi r^\ V I2-118-23OTA4{fv■vW Vm^ « r>. /»C t,3t!,hOO ^ $y^’ fa. If t /rcjte.s / f M.sv te V# „4 SW V# •<' 3e*. icrifced as bcglnnimj at a point on me tast line of saicJ ild Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Lhe center line of Orono Road Mo. as, (also known as Id Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Ipal Meridian, described as follows: Ueginning at a ast line, from the Northeast corner of said Southwest It; thence South parallel with said East line of the, rest Quarter a distance of 445.00 feet; thence North hence West along sa‘d Worth line to e point 990.00 feet \ South parallel with the west llm of said Southwest •r a distance of 345.50 feet: thence South parallel with satd Kn.t r to a i>oint S20.5 feet East measured along said parallel South line of said Southwest quarter; thcnc^ tast *iong North al ng ir»c Last line of said Southwest quarter of of said road to the Last line of said Southwest quarter; part of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter cr distant 449.62 feet South from the Northeast corner a distance of I6S fen; thence South, at a right angle, of said Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter; quarter of Section Ji lying within railroad right of aid SouUwesl quarter of the Southwest quarter described hence North akng the East line of said Southwest Quarter er line to Its inierseclion with a line drawn parallel er of the Sjulhwest quarter; tla'ice South along said ng sto tt>e po]nt of beginning. 1 inch ■ 200 feet february 19. 19B8 Iron marker OFF IN S CRONOERG. INC. ngineers, land Surveyors, Planners ong Lake, Minnesota List Wmh -N” •7-:\ '■Ml liii/'WBmtoFlAnnin^ CCMfcllBloii Ch«ir»'^ Kellwy Orofio Pltnning Cr*nii«*ion w««b«ra City m^ni«tr«tor BernhardaoaJ«*nn« A. NAimAtb, •uildinq • *oninq AdWinUtraCd? March 14. 19iiSubSeett #1251 Atidray ichultt. Vacation of Vln® Placa « Poraat iovlavara - Pvblic Haarinq OrdlMiBca — Saction 10.12 — Vacation of Straata. Allays, and Pabllc Grounds. Partial vacation of Poraat boulavard, tha rsMindar of Vina Placa and portion of a park. Saqa Bill Aaviaad, plat. of Bzhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit G Eanibit H Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit C D Er I j K L Application Plat Map Property Ownart List Patition for Partial Vacation Legal Descriptions Enqineerinq Report nua a^nnrt Nelson Lettar Plat Map of Area to be Vacated Wetlands Map As-Built - Sawr Survey of Vine Place/t orest Boulav.i^'d Shoreline ‘ • ^ V.^ : s-;;¥;i • Lt cation of Iftaaicif of Application - Per Section 10.12, the 0<c/ hi a published the reo notices for the proposed pt.rtlal vacation of Poraat remainder of Vine Place and portions of a park of the S plat. The vacation la a partial vacetiof involving nine j haa no knowledge as to why ownrts of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and Hill Revised, refer tc Exntbit L. "^Id not wish to be inc application. lired two legal Boulevard, the qa Hill Revised ropertles. Staff . Block 15, Saga Luded in current \mm staff finds no public purpose in maintaining th' unimproved portions of the subject areas, review Exhibit of Forest Avenue in an earlier planning decision wo installation of a public roadway - at least a connectinc to mention the steep topographies end the lake that occ' of the defined road bed. undeveloped or F. The vacation Id prohibit the hrouqh road not )it'S the majority Staff has enclosed as-builts of the existing sewer lines (Exhibit K) and the wetlands map (Exhibit J) confirming no wetlands t existing utility lines within the subject area. p;- ' The DNR Department of Public Waters advises nr proposed vacation and in a telephone conversation wit DNR Bureau of Lands, he also confirms no concern application as long as there is no construction propose area. Orono staff advised that based on our setbac there could be no new construction within the subject a concern with the Jim Lawler of the ith the proposed within the subject A ifei. his list can be 1-603 Government t the names on the Application is :e [OW assessments) plat ion is complete. te _ _ _ _ _ $150.00 $250.00 $300.00 plus 20.00/lot $150.00* brmation required ttorney, Planning ind further agrees te 2/z^/Af te Z/is/a€ days before the e usually held on .... 9 i mmmmsm IN ThE SW 1/4 CP SECTION 32-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MWNESOTA i \ 'Vi Souttxist Quarter of the Soutr^st d!U»fr. of tes feet^hence South at a right angle to the center line of Orono Road ho. as. (aliO ano»n at Ihii^’sSu?^."^^? al^ nfd lZT,r ?rni Jt uni of said Southe.tt Quarter of the South«,t Quarter; thence ijth *><>"9 «'« Meridian, described as follout: Beginning at a that part of the South-ett gutter ^ "Uured along said Eatt line, from the Northeast corner of said Southueil point on the ‘J 1^ dHulcrof S/S.oo feet; -e-ce South parallel uii.t said East of t^ rhe'SoirhUe?! ss-arniiThiicr:;ir.ft^rtrd*hi:tr^ii ^" “rlr^ 5i;^nc^*iJrs^v^r:v.?9aTfi. line froe the nest line of said sli?h!*st Quarter thc-.teh^th along tlic lad line of said Southuest quarter of said 5~.'.h line to the Southern sl^l^laswM J along the center lino of sal i rlad to the East I me of said Southuest quarter,the Soc.xest quarter to the OJiterline of hatertoun .toad, tnence ^ineasicrijr a g i,rri<i that nart nf said Southeast quarter of the Southuest quarter then^North along said East line of the Scat^st ?' >^s 'Sa irSiuant «rin« ^'m frw the Northeast corner described as beql!!ning at a point on l^ ast line o s^d ^ ‘ anotes to s1^IdTa 1 C a dlltance of IBS fe.t; thence South, at a right angle, of said Southeast quarter of fLactnH! ?aid cenl^'^Ui^^to the East line of said Southeast quarter of the Southuest quarter; 10 the center Im? of Wderlcv-fi Hoad; Ihcoce that uart of tr»e Sooinwest quarter of Section Td lying mitfiin railroad right of thence North along said Cast llf»e to the llh’^sHiOSO ALSO UtlPf that part of said SouUvest quarter of the SouUiv#est quarter dascn!>ed i.ay as (lescrlhed In Book 742 of Deeds, rage 612 as ^u«wni thencrNurih alt!ng the East line of said Southwest quarter as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Soulf^west q a , slcm said c^»ler line to Its intersection with a line drawn parallel Of the Southw^t quarter to the center line of Water own ^ quarter ir the Suuti.les? quarter; thence South along said J?ne'?o'thi ^irll,;e'irrald ^u’:Je\tZrfer of the Soutin,est. quar ter, thc^nce last along saldJ^uU^I^ to ?h^t of beginning. ______ e.-Ata I inrh . -■>00 fpptI hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I d.n a duly licensed larnf Surveyor urwUn tlw laws of the Slate of Minnesota. Scale Date 0 1 inch . 200 feel february 19. 19B8 Iron marker COmw t GROKOERr,. INC coffin I GRUfUIERG, INC. Engineers, Land Surveyors, PlaniiefS Long Lake, Minnesota kirk 5. Gronherg HN. Lie. No. 12/Sb 1^9 j»;.Date Rec'dBy ff *Fee Rec'd XI__ Telephone " 9£>ir& _ Telephone ;..i ■;>:;/.;VT;;ii ...... mm M^PLe R4/V ached to application y Land t Land tal, all parcels ial; no. of units pecify)... 4 ■:- ^ ..^v s;?:£’ W. J. . . . . . . .X1ZY.K1 FINANCE OmCE 1350200000 (no new building 250.(W^^ , c.*/£Of 71 :5i>.apr RECEIPT-THANK YOU ExUtin, Unu|0^»W «' New Units 02/29/i Total Units Units per 71,99 Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) ::r ri Eff ;v^:"s. '%■ :<f- ■ ■ y .• % m^m -m\- mm»IiWII HATCXIAL nCESSAKT FOB COHFLBTB PRBUHmART APfLlCATlON1. Application Co8q;>leted2. Prelielnnry Plat InforKation on Certificate of Survey.3. Certified Property Owner's list of owner* within 350' (this list can be obtained froei the HamnepiB County Depertaent of Finance A>(03 Gov«rn»ent Center 340-3271}4. Staaq>ed« legal sited envelope* (110) pre-addressed to eachof the naiaea on the above list with no return address.Cmrt**icm*\r,n by Zoning Departswnt that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date NnilllOM MATniAL HECKSSART PQB CQMPLRB P1«AL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easeswnts, Covenants, etc. T free 5. Developers Agreement and i.cceptable forts of security. Certification by Zoning Departnent that Final Plat Application is compititi. Zoning Officials Signature __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date PBBS Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II 4 III) Preliminary Review (Class I 4 II Subdivisions) Preliminary Review (Class 111 and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature 4 CL- Applicant must have al^ubmittals into the Ci^y offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on •-he third Monday of each month. I J V:; r'V'•;• ■■■: f i',. y-iy-^yy ■ • V V ■••. ' .W 'Vv $150.00 S250.00 $300.00 plus 20.00/lot $150.00* Date 2/z^/AA Date Z/i.^/a9 CITY oar oRO«oSUBDIVISION APPLICATIOB rOBMPSOPBRTT Nana OH Mailinu Addre Development Size S* • ■■’m S?>*;;x 5:^#1257 D«te Rec'd By 'ijyriLiciurr iia»« C4THAe.njp CtSM Telephone ^ * 9S>AA..- .. MAPI.A. Pt-AfUHailing Addresa S7t^O W^Ta£.TO¥J^/ K,<>A0 a4a/ _^6f3TS - A ■ A-______________^_ Telephone 1. (Attach list if more than one) pBoniTV ma:atiom Street Address J700 Wargg rrWV "TfiAD Property Identification Ho. (P.X.D.) _ M4Pi-€ ,. .'a Complete Legal Description to be attached to application BXISTIHG LAND USB ' Number of Ta* Parcels ^_ _ _ _ 5' V' 71.49 0.50 71.9^ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres TotalB all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify) __ _ _ _ __ Present foning District I - A I Division for Tax Purposes ________________un.i£J2 riHAm OFFICE 135020QOOO Lot Line Rear.angement Only (no new building 250.00 y CHECK 7L 250.00Subdivision for New Building Sites HECEIFT-nm YOU Numbet of Building Sites:Exl.tin, UnltlO-*®'’ Wl Wf New Units Oi/29/L Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per 71.99 Acres Minimum Lot Sise: X»4.t00t_ Square Feet Dry Buildable t*•« Cl ar Proposed Use: (check)/ Land Residential Other (specify) (OVER) K*-’i ;" ‘'v •• .' ■ jV.* : '-**..- ;.. .... ^. irife '.J .-.■•'te fev ;:»■•:'•>a. > ■ : ■ : '^ = v . ■ vi v ‘: • ■;■:•.:•msi /■ lili ,■ ’fete. k v-Vv -.tev.'.^-. -y*; -te- V . :. • •• ..• >••.• •••• V•te-..:- ^te ,.*... fete-^ ■; te ••;>.••: a •te'. V -terete "•••te ••; . v.:5is; V: vtetefe;r.A:‘."'• ’■J . .'i.r 5te\CteA.';:te:;'■£m§ ■■ ■'■..■ > • •• • •'m -i;v;^.v«v ‘yte”te-r:**- : • . . • ■ : ; • • -^V;; i ) 1 1/ .*. .v -V... .< ■Fte te mm I I..;: Bonestroo Rosene Aixtertik & AssociatesErtgfinMTS ft Architects March 7, l?8i City of Otqbo iox 66 Crystal lay, MK 55323 Attn: Ma. Jearna Mabusth Ra: Application #1257 - Catharina A. Cr Our rila Ho. 139-1257 Michael C. Lynch HCL:df Tear Jeanne: We have revleved the pFSpOied 3 lot reaidential aubdiviaion. The preliainary plat as presented it acceptable. Tours very truly, BOBISTROO, ROSENE, ANDESLIK 6 ASSOCTATIS, INC. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 5S1I3 • 612-636-4600 'V .*1.r****...** • rr!.:-.}. v; : • \ -^ V ^ ’•. (j). ’?»■ s« I u» *- ~ 0» I s*-< o 9 so m Sis: r* rv* o U4 r» I t/i *-• gS J» •-^;in •i^^ i: I-*mi§»r* V IB V •«V 4/1 ► !► w ^g"mS'-ii a •< 9 9 S Mi 2 v» u» S m M 3 •<|g 532gy S o . o 3S z K 2 gSs r :s2 8S *0 0» Q r;‘"2 M » Z 2«o» “•s i I Ss H » m rs> » ui ui ui 3 or* » o O •- r- ^2 SQ _ O*ssI/I n m H H H oo m rs» V* "*“g(/I til n *"5 Irvj 1 0^ S SS5 «s* VI vi ■gg »«.}- i »O 01 *- m H Q»om 10 I t0 Mi s: si «®g ■o *■ O ^ •S S'" ♦fir? > rn ni rn M 3D n 30 T| *T| H O M M m I urn- mmm • ;;.;v-P^^^VV^';'? 1 >:r:;-;^...:v •:;;::: 'J'rM ^VS:i;;.-'ix:;v.«irr>sOi^ 1 7-^M?mmi ■■r ■ .:: ■.■y-:---:^-;r\ • v.ir- v^v r"%> W - -^mdi ■•.'••■. .•.••• .; :.V'- ^ •=-•; 7 :yy'-*-■ r"f ' ■ •■^ y f •'. ! .••:'*'■ S-- * : •■' ■ ' m WM Y^. ■ YY:V : -Y-y :. ^ I.-:;;--::. ::..o.v ' •' V y ■: iy .*yyY ■ -yy-Y Y y:yS::Yy . Y -yy Y .:-. :;.,uj ■-i-vV -■:.•■■••■-.■i '• yy»Y- -.1 yY-\Yk:.Y ':Vy:yY i...,::yy-'®;yA - My ■ .y-y.Y.: my l:i’ S“J ’.i ymY%y»l ['■■ '. .; • ■ :=. . ■ . 7 ...■:-y- Y■’■■%• ''' ■:'•• ■ ■'‘i’ jk;lH?::,;,.::;V::‘..;..,Yyyi : '’-'.! * y ■"■ '• .. : .........^ / ■ ^■"■’ -$ip’ot plat application of at 3760 Watertown Road ig District and the on- lis approval is subject tertown Road and Stubbai plat. lea and bearings and ervation Easement over »es for Lot 1 Block 1 at totice that any future ddreas the issue of the g a 5 acre parcel for a conditional use permit within a year of the applicant shall either Lot 2 Block I or remove 3 and a building permit residence within a year ilat, the new owner will structures. Planning :ion date. unbuildable lot and may rty on the south side of lildable site. 1 is advised to contact electing the location of is hereby advised that ,y allow the use of the j of animals. l^.?■>:•■,'•' ’’''.-aIt. Per Section 10.27 reposed Lot 2 remain a time does not wish to i£ the current proposal ting improvements) the 1 satisfying all RR-IA I recommend if proposed that a determination be Lnal resolution should in creating Lot 1» the ion-conforming use. The live the credit of the ff has been made aware >r immediate development t on the duration of the , Staff would suggest if ^ear that the applicant 2 (or, if the new owner a principal structure *e removed). This again d in a final resolution e outlot consisting of sidered for combination ie of Luce Line. sdication of Stubbs Bay wetlands within the east in angles and bearings 'Will as)c for a Flowage td area. ubdivision in regard to ne safe access to the aution that Lot 1 Bloc)c iven in contacting the BS to Lot 1 Bloc)c 1. .red for proposed lots ea. The existing septic ;onforming and meet all lot lines. We have not of the 30 acre area. ■■■ \; V-y .--a ...tv ' I : ; ■ v - •-.-y r.:-: • >: ■ %= - • •.k : •F-::V :. .■■■■ ■ '■ ■' •.■■ . ■■ •.• \ ■. . . . '• *. • ■ . * *'• V .*■1 *-iYM:'Zoning file lUST March 14»Page 3 of 3staff Becoassendation - To approve the 3 lot plat application of Catherine Cram o^ the property located at 37*0 Watertown Roadfinding all atandarde of the RR-IA Zoning District and the on ­site septic code have been satisfied. This approval is subject %o the following conditions: 1. Dedication of right-of-way for Watertown Road and Stubbs ■ay Road as shown or the preliminary plat. 3. Define the w»tlanda in anglea and bearings and applicant to grant Plowage and Conaatvation Easement over the define wetland area. 3. Payment of S200.00 for park feee for Lot 1 Block 1 at $100.00 and Lot 1 Block 2 at $100.00. 4. Applicant to be placed on notice that any future aubdivision of Lot 2 Block 1 must addreaa the issue of the second residential unit by providing a 5 acre parcel for second residential rental unit or a conditional use permit for e non-rental caretaker unit. 5. If Lot 1 has not bssn sold within s yssr of the •corovsl date of the final plat, applicant shall either lecally combine Lot 1 Block t with Lot 2 Bloc)? I or remove the barna. If tha lot has baen sold arid a building permit h.»i not been issued for e principal ratidence within a year of the approval date of the final plat, the new owner will be asked to remove the subject structures. Planning Commission may wlrh to amend expiration date. 6. Outlot A to be designated as an unbuildable lot and may be combined with an adjacent property on the south aide of the Luce Line as part of a future buildable site. 7, Future owner of Lot 1 Block 1 is advised to contact City prior to site development in selecting the location of a future access. 8. Future owner of Lot 1 Block 1 is hereby advised that the setback of the barns will only allow the use of the barns for the non-commercial keeping of animals. ■ S;■ , ; ■ : . ■ ... a--... y ^■; ■.33' at. Pirk = ^V'^ V:. •i^.' A ■■•••'■■ Mmm•v=^r.Leyj Administrator tertown Road Hearing Type III Classification ass III SubdlvlBlon * if public road. ly detached dwelling tnces existing - non- d for domestic purposes ent lot lines and 150* 3. lotA - unbuildable lot mildability. :es8ory structures located .pal structure. of her 72 acre homestead standard requirement of [ residential structures he barns as noted above jacent residential lot jm existing residence used for the domestic The final resolution r future owner of Lot 1. the only lot that will t \ 1 • • • ; • ‘ ^ ... .• . •• SV •''■a■. • • • . 1-,. » •• • i-.. ..IS* M0yy . m a; ■'•'/ V.'■■■AA' ’■ • : . ■■■ A "-:vA ■'A.A-' •• • -^A ■" :.v ^''y-y' A?mm ISoniiig File 11257 March 14, 19tS IFage 2 of 3be sold for new residential development. Fer Section 10.27 Subdivision 2, the two residences on proposed Lot 2 remain a inon-conforeing use. Applicant at this time does not wish to divide off the rental house. In review of the current proposal (relation of proposed lot lines to existing Improvements) the house with five acres can be subdivided satisfying all SR"1A standards at a future date. Staff would recommend if proposed Lot 2 is further subdivided in the future that a determination be made regarding the rental unit. The final resolution should include this notice to the applicant. Fer Section 10.03 Subdivision f (A), in creating Lot 1, the City is asked to approve creation of a non-conforming use. Th® accessory structures/barns cannot receive the credit of the principal residence. Once again, staff has been made aware that this is the lot that will be sold for immediate development but thm city Bay wish to aatabliah a Halt on tha duration of tha ^l^ae the structurea remain non-conforming. Staff would suggest IE the property has not been aold within a year that the applicant wnild have to legally coaA>ine Lota 1 and 7 (or, if the new owner has not obtained a building permit for a principal structure within 1 year, the barns would have to be removed). This again ■ay also be a raatrictlon to be included in a final resolution for the plat. Per Section 11.03 Definition 24, the outlet conaiatinq of 0. 95 acraa is unbuildable and may be considered for combination with an adjacent property on the south aids of Luce Line. The City will ask for appropiata dedication of Stubbs Bay Road and Watertown Road. The designated wetlands within the east portion of the property will be defined in anglea and bearings on the final plat. In addition the City will ask for a Flowage Conservation Easement over the wetland area. The City Engineer has reviewed the subdivision in regard to access and finds adequate area to define safe access to the proposed iot-w. The City Engineer does caution that Lot 1 BlocK 1, becc lae of the curve, early care be given in contacting the city for safest location of a future access to Lot 1 BlocJt 1. Septic testing has not been required for proposed lots because they clearly exceed 5 acres in area. The existing septic systems that serve the residences are conforming and meet all setback standards from newly proposed lot lines. We have not required alternate septic testing because of the 30 acre area. ..... .. ;w ■ ■ AAaf Av • • . ■ • ■ : ■ —.; • ••• . mm?my v:- •.■■■; ■■ - /f{: -J I^ v^=-.; ‘:i ^S';. ; ; '..•,mmm sr:-. ." -... ■ ■!ij -.-jii MEETING DATE 3'3il~ g*5 <0W FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. name or number PRESENT FOR (fron agenda* ./> • 1 QL__^ L A. 4 ■itZ. /i3 f /* / .,Pa ^ 1 C^<> t,. rt,>/ • Pf r . <rr / <- #1 lih. /T/V: j,______ */1 I#®; r:- . :Vk.#mmr■■.'■• i t4' ■ 4,” ■ ^44:-4-t IN NI fe^'i My '■ a a ISKI i :.£:‘...v;,:y.^^. •-I :|k|:1«li '4 4vVa;-;'-;4:4' :j Sva:4'4;44-4:-4C4^::':::. ■ ':■ - ■ ' ■■Am;/:^iv} :■ - ^'1 .{ «:•• 4 4 4^ V i44:-4vv':;;>;4;=fe mm ^ i fe t- '■ V, .. -V :%e,4-4 PK:;:::a • •.ttva ■■: •• •. •• ■ l : ;4 -■4:'^iWW--SiMi0y9M mm-'44-^;:' 4;:»aV .;4• • ;• '\■■.;4.:>445:.^.-:a ■ ■'Xxy.-^M 4444; ';4^TOIffiottsiDifli • 1257 Catbarl M A. CraE, 3740 Watertown Road Prellnlaary fubdivlaion ** Public Raeiibgi SoallMf District - RE‘*IA 't&tml Area » 71.99 Acres AppHratfon - Subdivision - plat 3 lots IU>t If Block 1 ■ 22.27 acres Lot 2f Block I ■ 30.1 acres Lot 1, Block 2 - IS.4 acres Outlet A • .95 acres - Type III ClaiSlflCStion Pertieeet Ordli--------- , . , Section 11.03, Definition 64c - Class III Subdivision - Designated wetland, dedication of public road. Section 10.27, Subd. 2 - One-fa»ily detached dwelling allowed “ 2 principal reaidencas existing ~ non-* conforming use. Section 10.20, Subd. 3r»i) - Barns used for dosMstic purposes require 75' setback from adjacent lot lines and 150' setback froai adjacent residences. Barns • 75'^ Existing residences - 200'♦ Section 11.03, Definition 26 - OutlotA - unbuildable lot covenant required to confirm unbulldability. Section 10.03 Subd. 9(A) - Barns, accessory structures located on proposed Lot 1 without principal structure. l^ist of Bxbiblts - A - Application B - Plat Map C “ Property Owners list D “ Engineers Report S “ Preliminary Plat The applicant proposes the division of her 72 acre homestead into three lots. Each lot meets the lot standard requirement of the RR-IA Zoning District. All existing residential structures meet the required 50 and 100* setback. The barns as noted above meet the minimum 75' setback from the adjacent residential lot lines and also the required 150* from existing residence structures. The new barns can only be used for the domestic keeping of animals at the 75’ setback. The final resolution approving the plat should note this for future owner of Lot 1. It is staffs' understanding that Lot l^is the only lot that will (91^ \ fcini^r4'-!R immm^ ,444wm4.4."-44 i I wm$rnM i.-i' ■ V:' ■' ■ •.M.'V-'' sai« 1EETHIG 7:00 P.M. :IL CBMtBBRS 50 Watertown Road itition to Vacate Portiona of 11 Revised (Southeast Shoreline ntrol Commission - County Road 51 6 al Use Permit fc Variances " Orchard Road e - Referral From Council For Pence Lane e - Amended Application 1 Road * lALLY WITHDRAWN Point Road .xth Avenue North res - Public Hearing rdla Street - s«'-’'V. • •• ^;•s#' .■ mSKSTCB PLA814. 11252 Chris Haugen* Navarro Plat _PRD - Conditional Use Permit to Aaiend Original PRDiiDOinOIIAL ITBWS15. Planning C«tission approval of February IS* 1981 Minutes.if. Planning Commission to select a representative to att ud the April 11, 1988 Council Meeting. ,:r vi' ^ ^ * ; •*' t r > ■mm •-• • •. I • .t * a •< 'v'. * p * .-j»;.. • ^$1^i':' ■■• Mammimr-jp fcS4*»",'-. iJ: '*;- " i: . : ,.r ' vsS;' ' ■-vie';. rnym rntmmmmMrnm imrnm ■>rnrmmm-/M VM k-.. 0 IM PACKET ^ i: . 'SajJt -1 mWMm 4" ^ iv :-~f-StlffTf.- ■_ : . ~ f . f^i,;^" .•■s.■-v-v^^'vr-.;^:^-.;': ■ .^' ■ • ■.•!■:■2:.: .^.i'i -K. ■• * :«■'•■■■y^,1^.:. ...••.■• ,•- - ' .VV ■ ■ ^;:; -^-R >•••-rr V i-“}f4..Ssi^ srsiiiiS mi---'- ^ s pi! ,.7^-. ■ '- ■ ■ L ' . .-' ai ■W^ 22m y.l,^ ■ ■ ■’:■-■ w^-'- ■■::'|fcaifK.. ‘'‘: y -2---> ■ ■•- . v; -fW a^K-’mmm-IstlESEia- >:.■;■ ;>■ ,;; .-:v-'r;./ a a= - a PtANMING OOiOaSSlf» MECTItiC HONDAI, MMRC8 21, 19S8 7s00 IP.H',1275 BMMI MQM> SOUn - C30BHCIL <SMllgig>mMcit laanossinrATivi -m I « I I 1. %m VOIUC UBIRIVCS 7tl5 P.H. 91257 CAtharlfte A. Cran, 3760 Hatartown Road Prelininary Subdivitlon . 1 2.7*45 P.H. #1251 Audrey Schultt - Petition to Vacate Portions of Forest Boulevard, - Sa^e **111 Revised (Southeast Shoreline of Forest Lake) 'mmr^ 3.Si30 P.M. 91256 Metropolitan Waste Control Coanlssion ~ County Road 51 6 19 Intersection - Conditional Use Pernit 6 Variances *- ACYICM STBS 4. 11218 Estate of Ruth Smith, 387 Orono Orchard Road Subdivision - Third Review 5.11223 John Waldron, 1951 Concordia Street Conditional Use Permit 6 Variance *> Referral From Council For Review Of Revised Proposal 6.91233 Michael Halley Homes Inc., 2715 Pence Lane Conditional Use Permit 6 Variance - Amended Application Second Review 'vP ■■ ■: . --T ,• W;' -r - • ..; 11247 Robert Posthumus, Record Lot No. 40 Variance >■ Second Review :r ■ ••:• '=•=v:i/ -• ^ < 5i. 8.11248 Thomas Williams, 4127 Oak Street Variances - Public Haarinq 9.91249 Daniel W. Cronen, 2780 Shaydwood Road ' Variance - Public Hearing - FORMALLY WITHDRAWN bwv ■■ 10.91250 Dana M. Wells, 1397 Orono Lane Variance - Public Hearing 11.91253 B. John Lindahl Jr., 1406 Bohns Point Road Variance - Public Hearing } 12.91254 Trinity Lutheran Church, 2060 Sixth Avenue North Conditional Use Permit 6 Variances - Public Hearing ;vv;:!a MgmM: m-m2cfes77' 13.91258 John & Kathy Ehlert, 1785 Concordia Street Variance - Public Hearing >i » % ;.■■> ii*8aylK:i®l¥5fS iHH H rf-y8f K' 77.0 . v^-- ^ Pi i't "•7 c8'7:../: 7' ■■ ’-8 •: ■ n^\'- r:v 'I % r1 ■ ‘7/ , ■j .. ••ii ■&• ' '■'7;. ■ v:. V:..- . .< ^ .V -Tg&isaai ^^TTrrr SERVICE ENGINEERINGt*" ^ .■ ,*..11• j. ,jnwj' .1irjV5, ;5i 'ocat«o La» • nr• tort-.*. I "iS -ssk»'3 tc c«-i*'-mm« an •»f.(Rate of -ista ^cr t..o alto'-n*-.!.** -ft'cr. ara 5*iny ccnaidaraa »c raoair 'S fa'* «d iiooa. T.n* **.5i • JW1 *>'j analysia n oas©c -n tna 153 Concor3’.A A.anu« ->*' fra ~.»io a1 te.'nati'<®« ar* a 3 - s*'!t5»ian syatefw •nfr, '•ainforcafi sicse a'ltanaf'va j »*« 'td-'d horizontally mtc v-a acrtanKr*a “.ai*. alooe -.a as*3ri.r :o a':'.' tr.us dreata a »tao1a alooa. '"■'a a'.’.a liras ahc»<n *.n t^'*a attacnao i^a P'"f■ * / ::^■ ;■tKM B_/ - ”7 • lc!'f'>».6 mMli} • tT ••♦•’■•••T 5*'.i'"'? rain ’^crSafi lloaa a ‘- rw.T.ovad IS au'.taola it ■is .■'©Dlacoo x'th tra g.'ids fcatween t^ia "^a/ars. fSi'^% is «ovarad w'itn tcpa-i 1 ano * •■ 7. -w---' da-. ?£tac -tn ro-d. Ti-» i d .e"Cv-a< Of. ■ ..'-*■ 1 zcn*. a . t.oi . - - - of caini desian with tha front faca prio'd'dura tc nolo 'in ora oolyrRar grids whicn art "r to ra'>nforca tha m'' -ita tr.a fa: Vj '-s o'ana a ting s ’ooa is rasnoz-ao to tor and if tha teat s'-is'* ^ ® men ccfTiDactad ''fzi joon corrplatior. tha o'.osa arolanKSt .•'.atora* te oai'v'''»'- sssomad a * aacf.cns ara fi..ao ‘5 osmg a .vrap arouno ;'"t f mstalling tim&ar. or a steal crib. Tha o*-os ara similar to lincoln ^ 11 ’w*t,^**•'*'■*■ r* ^ *3 *! 0 9s on a 3rarci0r 3cai®. Ti'.® cr*o p.t,6r.cr is Sii t*r.® wall is censt.. u«>w*3Cnir.5 ^ra^nular t‘ front -^a> oi f. left as '.t IS or covsrec w^th 3l facin? that Natural grcAf**»-;ll evartually estaol 1 sr. .t'or • oonti’i <'^c^y'Z'^^0 strot oners 5.":-.a JS3 0“* ■|.''«j -'1. JOt jOv - - i8 • *• - a? T.... w 1 ‘ S . W Vi • • V- '3. V#ion 00 ■£ Ul'"0 a \i■ th®ya'3 it ha’: -jia*--. *‘J ..a‘* :. sten .ir.er or :c-ir ■;.. •V. ■'.:;■.:•■•;•■: ■'• ■■ .••;■. V /;• ••■.;■• ■ i' Ikf ■ . .' '•■ V liitai :> •-:• ■■; ^ wmammmm^ •• ■■•-■ ■ • ■■!= ;■ • ..'■■ ■T- . ■ i" .. ■ : • r !• ‘i ■:'t :; I i'-* : '•* ’ fc' vi- . V ..rv.. '■': j‘v''- Si,-‘%i;;. ^ ^ V V\yi ■ V.■•■O.-■ ••.' fc •“■■. a .iS■■ , ••-T;■ ., ”iTfr : - , ' )>,;A ’"i’ .'*t^ i.- ^>45^'-^ ,^■ ^ i'A. •?! ' "hiii' :’/.’’.-^-.**'ky y*' f1 >>*•;•■ »■'■ • V f•••;-•'’'^' Vv-^ \\ ■ '5;',:.;■*■ v: .: <* A"' ■ 4-* •.>...••.* ;►• ,■ >. • :.,. pl#®1pKfcAf;! il^:: iti'>„' .5 •■ ■■ I#: . ■• ..•,'B"' - ■:W--;,*'vi' ■ -' ;-'■ • .6 ••-;.*? •-' ^ 'ft ' i'V ' ; ' ■ V ■ ■ ‘•/^ ■'.. ^ V ,■ ?•/ f *i .-, •■> . <■. .v-ft.-i^ '■; ■ *i,-5 •> •'“t. ■ mm fw'*0‘ Ifetm- #-vjm: -j'-' '. ; ■/•,> : '"' W;--; .:, ■ -'■ -»;*V !’.V .,.,.r. .ft :::;’^'X'P it.' ■ - ■-/• ^ W^. . ^-'ft-" ■■ >■> ^ .-*r-/.» ‘ft^ V^*^' .... ,....y ^ \ ,;.. ’, ^ ^.......................... ft. ‘ ’ft ’ ■*>).'< i ; ’ y, ft ft . ^-7t& PfcKj^K L»S.lB/P*g6.W^iNjABK>r M, ' V: -ft. , :. .................................. ' '--ft r-'V- ■'W.-ft • . ' * ‘ • ' T-^AxtB-^l^^iar^^TUCrr "T ' js^ssm v>--'>i ftS#S t*-- 'V ■• . * ,-J, ‘ft.JJ ft ... <.'V >:>i r-- ■■ -Z mjusrium u6^A*.y » *M# ^ ______________ (iuri.iaMT AMwt — VtilFY UJCAT10.4 U.LA.TIV*. lb ILCCT u £ep>f«!FVi '3^ c.K<-irvt. tJovrjH^ Pe^riaH ■^PUANT/Afl DKLtfr-rfcO \ ( ^ ar M^t/iiTe^T ^''"\'~-M liii^Mr* Sn.t t>ur»Ty>/ ■‘T-^ ■T- «JSJ oi/T4<e>E. JUHr 1 ■^11^1/ , ■p'iJ*K*Vt-'.\ •-Tif'- .. fcJiioTiSiJ .'i >' ' «n “ r=INL^ec-jt_£ FL^1^-B WA-i^cJewNts P»»UT /t»AMO t finM-^ep \^i f^,sir <^yp fc<?T£x IM —VVtSS-R r?v u r ^IxrBRTtX. tf.r £^T.ar/f'MUT \c^W**P ■fW-4T «b^BRi®E. _—J*TS / 6t-l Y-AH — eir-7 _HfeP-E 1 _ E-:vr|_- -■—KUL.^,4^ yiKIQoW eSxPi PaTc -M ce-io fKT^H i &2/V rt-r rpTlfcH Nort^ 4 More,* cA^Pt-T r^KiT*tflT. eaTixT —I-----t-xLcL 1 Fap-t 1 un * ;!1 J /V 1 £2cn —TEP^.Nk97»2.i' 1 ^Utrr uiHB r1* _Tt-«/ y f*&Acve eine>rins~ wiHi^w pjat^sh uvAij^-see nwv / #y AsvtNs*. ■ *#• -rmr-TutS • .»*><=• »*“ «v-e mxmTifa <=e<j->«s» Ttl^ ^ MPPL/Soe T1K/W1 Aoo ALT. >/P-t-TtuTbi-t. c.fc(LJkJt3 E>£-TK.-e.^J tA^,tD i.'rtNIlwti A/ fiMkiT WALL'S bE.TWfc.t-M /Wat-Cs <rPtA|i|sK3% £::?r^'■f;. SfcriHePU'e rP-L''Tt,i.T E-xi^rcwLM Te-t.e_<b «=ip-l.'M aoM-lT r- ut-Tk-- M ISAM Afijt. C2Z?P-f=kv-te Hpy^r^ Ntf-•5ize 7>^-mat kTiA l-CV.14.y,/6.T»r-M ii 'J£-AEJtM OUWR— fc?i£s-i"r -.xVx»:6V.V6 <Mn«ci fci 1^2.f..' .xo'.iTT^CAk LA.Tt>4 ur»Z'-u'x u’.i'.ltrt'AAlVlt .9AX, k^A-A f5L.2.'.»Vu>;i'f»OSfv. ML <»A.K u^m MACU. A«»AUd «U01iNl<q 6HAV> , ■ 1 rr.. . j'.L'.sVWi pf»*-t»Us,Vi»e«i F£>UC» «cs £--u,4x'.'-»-»cS/fc‘LaT£-H I'.u «.li -Vx.l!i(*-ec. utK. rn.i'uM.ulExlVs* •2^-7 1:L.fS*l ei Fe»U£-»- I. jg^^ro z?^rn^ 4 hjikidt W ..:-ft^'.-iMCj tM*»U «*-**>«- rr»~vr 4 i. pANtx. Td mat^h EjusiTimj* ‘hjiSrHT FlSVJf^ Sg^POLF; hum Hew- A j r C*rft-TG. y* D r^io e’l-Crc &r tl-c 4 1 11 EHLERT ' USE EHL HOU ADBITION O' ^,r CQ. T-l 1785 CONCORDin SI. ORONO, MN. 5B391 Eos cxaRPOFumoN ARCHITECTS • SPACE PLANNERS* INTERIOR DESIGNERS 664 exCELSIOn aoULEVHRQ# SUITE ONE EXCELSIOR. NINNESOTR SS331 16121 474-3251 SU7EXT6IQN 7«f(5S srniEjjf »rt .lLrlfc.,s-<«T- NOTES: CO-nRfiCTOR MUST FIELD VERIFY RLL DIMENSIONS SErOflE COMMENCING VORK. NQT'FY RBCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF PNY DISCREPANCIES RRE FOUND. FLOOR PLAN SCHEDLfLES LOMM NO.: 0Tlb2 drawn : Jfi URTE: 1:/18,3T rev :A1 .Liig sjirs ■■ /-Bait line of Let 5, BM 9, Tommih ef ienyehn Ptrk S 1__ _____ - “ - A/nrth r-1 STATION_____ M Tf9, PHASE 2 ADDITION TO AND NEMODEUHG OE TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH LONG LAKE. HN. \ ) Tti 1 wcuyn:i.D v;*" ;:: i rri —TO WOLSFELOS NATURE AREA; -^NEW ADDITIONAL RARKBM c\? MAMM ^ MOICATM L21 MWPAVM* . ^ SITE PLAN 0 fUknoNOS) y.iA«— rnau T sw-ssr S-- LOMA tAKi: r :.y '' COWQITtOllAl Ml PIAIWT A VAAIANCl MOMIT