Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-20-1989 Planning Packet
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE ■»i * CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1, l\o i * /Tu / i•'•■Ktn /OC'O / C nit^y^ '^ x /J>" 2. L1 <ut '/sc h /6 3.':iof^£rrj '^Tincu'»r 4 Irps-A&VNr '—-------------— --------------------------------------------------- 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. 1. 2. • 3. 4. 1 . 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. PUBLIC ATTENDANCE i. • 1 ^ ■1 ‘imv Vj IOkJCITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE/WS' PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1.' bc'i -i /AJ'II // z- ■ zv;-r/;,-o rV_ 2. fAnn / / / //n /2 f (^ffny /X on - ? ^ C- Hj YY /f Y *./ s/'isdri v)I'lti l(!^)tZ)C4 / /(. 7 .A^^ c/vt O V <- r ,<3 i i -'^l V 8 f J i i' >T !5 V'-? /V >. ... f-ifj /ni',7/ 7 10^/l--<■ ^ ' 11 /x /C^ 1- ^I ^ ^J.' kk ^*7 / ^#\ fA< ‘ 13. )vOlVvJl\' L (C^l\j-Cx.L\— i rr-iv< i* / Vy^ ) 14. 1 / ' ' 15. Cu Z my t r k . J / •' 'i ''r r /l* d > ^1 ^ cl \ ly^ X,/o *.• ✓ 4 \ 4'.7 i?/( />'/' /'/ t -• -. Z J.o 18. /j \ ' O' Q Iw'TC'' 'Z'\K V \\ v ^N.vjl *»y i7 Yi^io c'ir. L-.p ,K \i ' ( \y L ti L4'^4. ^ ^ A. 0*^^ ^ ^ \ S iOO 017r J-iV-tv. Pt TO: mt: »« •\ 0f * • le ■ W. IL R. r. Midch ». 1S7S ______- loss M«Bt - Ut ; iT w , •. •■ ,* *♦• ^ * «* A * y ^ 35,^5^ lasrS'SiSSffii^iS^^ • « . r j.'i A ^ ■: r-^ V•^,a. 4 t > hUwliJStirtMrM ^ i* • Am • S4.4S0 9^ tot VlMi - 2S ft. >.<» .-''S*« ®MSJ£2*5J S.*'-a ■r-» •. •^•i yVtr^ . ■■ ' ' Vi' I*/- ! ' ' •/* -fc \ a»-. w .1 V ^ Jy^ ■ ' • 7 ' ■ • 1 .« ; ILMWINCOOI ?.<v.. liaf «a inUageoMlOmd wltba ___ ____ i«t, iM XL) Pmsliitlai tMto (2) “ “ ♦ ^ •• -i • % ^t.. f . 4 . ^ ’ *• .• ' .- I.» - .?;•••• • ♦. .* *f-* ^ * i \: t • 1 *. •.,* :< •: -4! v,v7., ''S : ML»V»Ary.-- r• *A“<t r-^ :»■* *v * '•^'^V'* ' 4 . ' •/ ••••. •.- f*. • ••.i;. TTiTf •» Searles momd, Botl«r meeadmd, to grant Odd • ' RovicX, 1055 Naat Pamdala Road» a lot nroa» width ^ 1055 hhot fondnloXltoad and atraat aotbaek rarlnncaa and alao a- rarl anra frwiffinntliltd) 1 ‘ i * "p 31.203. notion, Afaa (4) - Maya (0) ^ nr. Dick Boaaon, City Ateiaiatrator tho Ci^ of Oreno adwartiaod thrao i waaka for atraat aatariala.aad agai] rantal bida with bid eaaaihg at.lOt Monday, Janaaryi5, * ' »•* :*«abalati< aeeonntinf ol^allttida'^xaeai cooBiandad low ihiddara .aad.al Tha aceaptad ^tow ■ hida I for nn coat f itariala vailabillty^id ^loeation of ^t« alinggdlatafeaijtoia Bwppliar^ia Whan ranting aqoipaant'with *aa opara guldad hr tha .^fpa, aiaa of aquipaan rata, 4 ^ . . ..Zt ia poaaihla^;to'^aaard -tha -low bid ono eontractor: whan 'Jonmidninq aata aquipaaBt.'^ZB^6xdar to atinnlata an for tha foXlowinp.yaar'a workf .'wa'na] divida tha '-work /aeeotdingly anong th< blddara. • In tha aaant tha*low biddar ia not v tha City raaarvaa.tha right.to porehi naxt altamata. I X raeeaaiand that tha City Coimeil aec awarda tha taholatien of biddars as f for tha ealandar yaar 157C. * f lah aowad, Bntlar saoondad, that th bo awardad to tha teaignatad low bidd shown on tha tabulation abaats for 15 natarlals and aqulpaMnt rantal. Moti Ayas (4) - Maya (0). waish novad, BuUar aaeendad, that Rai •458, A Kasolntion Oaaignating Appoint For Tha raar 1576, ba adoptad. Notioi Ayas (4) - Raya (0). Mr. Dick that:laon. City AAiinistrator, i "Flaasa find attaehad a eowar lattar a analysis fron WUlian Paat» who was ra as a consultant to awaluata tha M4a a apaelfleationa ^for our inauranea paeka » .. • • vf- a . k • . ' I * •naaa——a—waww^Tki^kP.. ^Jum * •. •». Spy 4“ 7? '«• ^ ;v,r . ■-p • • • •f >, .• • * i-; •.••'■ * Tv/V ' . • • .■i: nr^v/v •r>‘ > --w- ’ V'; - idlin'• ’ ' : 1/ 2^^^” '^'7/ •y» ^ * ■ '■*' ’■•V*. ,r - "• TSH-.'* 'S V - •>; • \..k* i% - a. T'^. s.-- .% ' ^ a -’ V. a^ ,* • •' *. * * S?.‘V \ .. ' f't ' • • ' • . K • <• * • • . X* “‘^’1 /V. . 7 i . ’t.x ■« '"/» ^'- V ••• • '-S Itteirice MeCifftar - 106S Fmidilt M Wist Pace 2 12. Jmat 2». an - Utw trm Mwt« tt r « i“ sS5«ss;;^ ;s53Vjrs b. -,. fOMiM. 0«’t llirf wmr.) • 15. SeiM^ #,1973 - Uttw tnm IteCafftef to ItaM to»lalal« plattliv toA tomnJnt* (Still m ^rl«r) • ^ I I., 16.Conr of letter ft* ^ik mtmtma that e StOW^toll If v^' 17. II. 19. m.: it,r^ •. SSSliKflitoiiikl U. 19H • ?<«to tnm tf *:ni: felia to 20. gepwto er 12, 1973 • ^"SS-wjr. y 21. SepMtoer 17, 1973 - Sejtotoe r », 1973. 22. October IS, 1973 -MlnttinJaf pcevloai elentito [ at Ug^ e MM St fcltoer elmtito. 23. Hutofcar 9, 1973 • !\' Ivv! ^v- • k a* fool for fill pendt. 24. oacater 12. 1973 - ifffUcetiaa fbto la ant to • '* to ^ijlliCttlOB VV; »■ !■ ^nir.a Flit' *1184 - -'rr^r?b^r 22, 1987 Add it iona I Corrnontr. ? of Additional Cowwicnts and Planning Commission Recommondation ThJ* noiahborina property owner tc the w.«?‘ of the sub'oe’- property has • Me'! sinc^ the Pl.mnim Cemni«5sicn t''view on ?''ptenb«'r 8, 1997. She th.it she supported t:'-' proposed int roveTents bu*- wanted to be ppoci.i’ care be made during censtructicn to net permanently or .-Ty-i ly alter drainace sva I •' ilono the west side of the property, inclutled this concern as a condition ir the attac.hcd resolution. The Planning Ci>mmiri.ion recommended irnrcval of the side setback viriance of 15 feet and the increase of 1.5* of hardcover within the 75- •'.r* setback .irca as proposed by the applicant bas^d on the findings noted .-V staff above. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning 5;r»ion rcccrrTonclat ion. . ? ^ ^ ^%*0 ,v'^vM \'".- *'1 T vt ,-%w. fT::’^ >\' ■'■ •;-' • * * N ' - ? ^ L i^m iT.u %.“.ve Hi- - f '-i’ •.. - ' "■ f<‘ • •'■'^^>----'-.K^:^ •3^ ji, . ,/' .' ! I '^Wr} ri fer ■ j'^'-J^ iil^ ^1S ■<;*! V- • ' i '^Jl' V' ®\ -V. /• • /r43P M r:'-w '^' iyjL,, •v ii'‘ 3‘4-5> *. rc Jm)SktS Mi ■ *'j'. - ‘ fi ^^■'i •■ ''T^-*'' ■■ '•• v.-ivS ,>'vi': .;Vl*:-l.. Ci: . i.?JBi . ! J » •»“«. » 1 i ■ ii * 3 Planning Connnisaion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Froa: Dates Michael P. Gaffronr Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 17, 1989 Subject: #1465 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road - Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, sewered Application - Request for variance to Increase hardcover in 75- 250' zone. Also, a fence height variance is requested. FOTBs This memo is an addendum to the attached memo and exhibits of October 11, 1989. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Most Recent Version of Site Plan Exhibit B - Elevation Views Indicating Terraces Exhibit C - Staff Hardcover Review of Most Recent Site Plan Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 10/11/89 This item was tabled at your October meeting in order for applicant to submit a conditional use permit application for grading work in the 0-75* zone. That is application #1481. Applicant has submitted a combined site plan/hardcover plans/grading plan which is attached to this memo as Exhibit A. I have reviewed the hardcover history of this property in Exhibit H-P of the 10/11/89 memo. Staff hardcover review of the most recent plan is attached as Exhibit C of this memo. A summary of previous, current and proposed hardcover is as follows: Per Per Per Approved Approved Proposed Most Per 1987 per per Site Recent 1975 As-Built Res.#2279 Res.#2546 Plan PlanApprovalSurvey10/12/87 11/28/88 9/89 10/27/890-75'1.44%3.4%3.5%3.5«2.9%4.5% 75-250'31.8%33.2%36.8%36.8%<3.3%46.0% {AreaO-75* - 16,800 s.f.; Area 75-250' - 15,870 ».f.) Applicant is additionally requesting a ferce height variance. Please carefully review the memo of October 11, 1989 and the ne*-> «-<’‘lbits. Nl I M Bones troo Rdsene Anderffk & Associates OfTO G aonnoDO.PE PE Jo$fpr» C And!*!*. PE E Ijmer pe JtmnC Own PE G<eno » Coo* PE E Noyei PE EbOert G ScbunicfW. PE L Vxvay PE A GoPdon PE W Powf Oon^idC BupgwdL PE inry A BouMdon. PE Mar* A Hanson. PE Teti K Find PE Micnan T Paurmann p| Poenr P P*p^»<f pe Oand O Lositya p E ^bomas W P^tefVTO PE Engineers £ ArcMtecU Mcnan C LyrKn. P£ iamesP Mai«V PE Kennetn P Anopnon PE Mark P PDPl PE Potert C Pussek. aia Tho! 41 £ Angui PE HtMtmaA SanpMO. PE Oanct J Edgprton. PE Mark A Sen PE P*kpp J CasMCt PE Mark O VMm. PE Thomas P AndPnon Gary P Pyiandpr PE Miles B Jensen P£ L Ph*kp> Gravei ik PE Chanei A E^xtson Leo M PjMietsky HananM Osors Susan M Eoerkr C PA AIA Noveaber 10, 1989 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Robert Will Our File No. 139-1289 Dear Jeanne: reviewed the proposec. subdivision for Robert Will. The Will Subdivision provides for extension of the cul-de-sac in the Wear Subdivision. The security deposit required for the project is as follows: L.S. 1000 c.y. 800 Ton 50 Ton 250 Ton L.S. 40 L.F. 2 Each Clear & grub Comaon excavation £ 4.00 Class 5 Aggregate Base 6 8.00 Class 5 Aggregate for Shlds £ 10.00 2341 Bituminous Surfacing i 24.00 Restoration 15* RCP e 20.00 15* RCP Aprons f 300.00 Total Construction 50Z Security Deposit Total Security Deposit $1,500.00 4.000. 00 6,400.00 500.00 6.000. 00 3,000.00 800.00 600.00 $22,800.00 11.400.00 $34,200.00 If you have any questions please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONES^OO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh LB/25 2335 \X^st Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 L A V R ate C onsultants, Inc I3l00 NV^yzata Bixilexard • Suite 130 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55343 (612) 545-8M0 October 26, 1989 To;Mark Bemhardson, Cltj Administrator Jeanne Haybusthe Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members Fr<a: Robert Will Reference File Number:1289 After Receiving Mr. Bemhardson's letter of October 16, I talked with Mr, Wear about access thru his development. Three points came to light. 1) Only one of Mr. Wear's lots wa.«; sold, not three as his sign indicates. 2) Mr. Wear .still controls the homeowners associtation. 3) Mr. Wear wants $20,000 per lot for access (total of $60,000) for all lots now and future that access thru his development. As Mark requested in his letter, I once again tried to negotiate access for my lots so that no more curb cuts would be on Old Crystal Bay Road. I have done everything in my control to follow the city's land plan. Mr. Wear has not changed his position and we are approaching a third building season. Therefore, I would again ask the city to take whatever steps are necessary to approve and make way for the subdivision we are proposing. Sincerely, Robert J. Will •* , ' .* • ••• • •.;■« • » •• • •*. I t ■ 4 .•• • ,• ^ ... • fto «S //i2 'S£ JRLINGTQff * 94^^ \ / 0^:^• j J w^rfWTDiim-**** -T*Mi»4iTCHTq»W <I0<^ • ' m % p O-’f ^ r-»^anaed the definition of a '=d'«“U?neS°iS“t3 Municipal code. Sec-.ioo 6.01 of ?5‘T«nr«un!“pti"codi orlplnelly feed, subd. 2. 'Ptlvate “*^'^“a%o"pubUr5srorSlhicb Which has f®„uhiic fundL but which is open is not to^n^easement between persons or to travel city, or.-vate roads are P!5f;:;.°»oeSb as ^.cuT»erirtEI1-cKipb^ nf orono M.inlclpal Code, S 6.01, subd. 2. ^ ritv Council amended the on July 25, °!r?oed- The new definition is definition of o„ in all respects, except that the similar to the old defini " J quoted passaoe has oeen underlined Isnjuage 1 ” f’quid again amend S 6.01, deleted. The Orono City Counc.i co t.ads, "All “fuat^ 5o.drr.t tl o?«V?,^ii,^«|j!e“and°?Serr”!J»?S.«“ho private residences. ZSRP718 -4- North Oaks, 264 Minn. 32, 117 N.W.2d 396 (1962). The court reasoned. This court has heretofore held that a municipal corporation has the power under (M.S.A. S 412.221, power over ordinary private roads which are not freely used by the public, that power must be held to extend to such private roads where they comprise the whole road system of a village(The scope of the police power] covers a wide range of subjects, and, while it is especially occupied with whatever affects the peace, security, h«»lth, general welfare of the community, it is not limited thereto, but extends to dealing with conditions which exist so as to bring out of them the greatest welfare*of the people by promoting public convenience or general prosperity and to everything expedient for the preservation and comfort of the inhabitants of the corporation.... That which may at one time be regarded as not within such at another time, by reason of changed conditions, be recognized as a legitimate subject for the exercise of the power.' Id. at 400. (citing 62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, S 123). underlying easement reverts back to the homeowners in North Oaks but reverts back to the City in Orono. The City of Orono may rely on the reasoning in Borchert to amend its that all private roads must be open to homeowners and their SSo n«d to u« th. private toads to |et to th.it orooertv The City of Orono can then protect the genera-, welfare^of the City of Orono's citizens by promoting order an convenience as is it is empowered to do under M.S.A. S 412.221, subd. 32. An opinion of the Attorney General, citing ^ that a city council acting under M.S.A. S 417.221, • empowered to provide snow removal upon a privately-owned str open for use to the general public at the **P*2f® ,aja abutting homeowners. Op. Atty. Gen. theThe Attorney General reached this conclusion by resolving the case "upon its own facts, with due regard for the publi£ J”«est ?o be served by the city providing the service directly.." -3- Z)- I D- The CMP provides that the purpose of the easements is to "ensure legal access of the public to the properties served bv the private road." CMP 7-12. The Transportation Plan provides that, [tlhe arrangement of streets shall provide for the continuation of streets between adjacent properties when such continuation is necessary for convenient movement of traffic, effective fire protection, for efficient provision of utilities and where such continuation is in accordance with the City Compre hensive Municip«'l Plan. City of Orono Municipal Code, S 11.32, subd. (H)(1). Pursuant to the CMP and the Municipal Code, the easements may be utilized by the City to ensure legal access of properties served by the private road. In making its decision to exercise its easement rights, the City may decide that the opening of private roads for use by homeowners in new subdivisions is necessary ror the convenient movement of traffic. B.The City of Orono may compel private owners to allow public passage on a private road by exercising its general welfare powers. The Minnesota State Legislature has provided specific powers for city councils. Among its enumerated powers. The Council shall have power to provide for the government and good order of the city, the suppression of vice and immorality, the prevention of crime, the protection of public and private property, the benefit of residents, trade and commerce, and the promotion of health, safety and order, convenience, and the general welfare by such ordinances not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States or of this state as it shall deem expedient. H.S.A. S 412.221, Subd. 32 (emphasis added). The welfare powers which are outlined in M.S.A. S 412.221 are to be interpreted broadly so as to s tsta'.n municipal activities reasonably related to the needs of tt * city. Sverkerson v. City of Minneapolis, 204 Minn. 388. 283 N.W. 555, 556 (1939). The Supreme Court of Minnesota has held that the general powers contained in M.S.A. S 412.221 are broad enough to allow a village to regulate traffic and to expend funds to enforce such regulations upon privately-owned roads. Borchert v. Village of -2- ■ TO: PROM: RE: DATE: MEMORANDUM Hark Barnhardson# City Administrator City of Orono Thomas J. Barrett, City Attorney City of Orono - DF 3643-091 Re9ulation of the Dse of Private Property July 21, 1989 P-< ISSUE Mav the City Of Orono compel private owners to allow pSbuS passage on a private road without mating the road public? CONCLUSION The City of Orono probably may compel private * road to open the road for use by the general public under appropriate easements. Further, the City can lik ^ 1 such acc®ss und6r M.SeA* S 412«221p subd. 2 ds lb was'^interpreted’by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Borche^ V. Villa<^e of North Oaks, 254 Minn, 32, 117 N.W.2d 396 T1962). " DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Mav the city of Orono compel private owners to allow pSbUc passage on a privaJe toad without baking the toad public? A. ^qhts to the platted easement. □nder the terms ot easements may be able to assert that it has a right to , Mads to all homeowners who live on the road or to all people who could be reasonably expected to use the roads. The exercising of the easement rights by the City of Orono is consistent with both the "S"?J®™rthrcity(hereinafter ’CMP") and the Transportation Plan of the City. 8178?■ a. TO: FROM: OATS: Mayor and City Council J Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat<^V) August 21, 1989 SUBJECT: Public/Private Roads Attachment: A. Attorney's Opinion on Public/Private Roads Dated 7/21/89 ISSUE - 1. Presentation to the Council regarding the City's ability to take over private roads. a. By ordinance. b. By specific easement /rant. 2. Presentation of information regarding City's ability to extend private roads to serve others without taking them over. 3. Presentation of information regarding the City's ability to enforce on private roads. INTRODUCTION - As a result of a recent issue regarding the City's right to mandate the extension of a private road the attorney developed Attachment A as a means to address the issue. DISCUSSION - As noted in the memos the City has the following abilities should it choose to undertake them in relationship to private roads. 1. Ability to take over private roads as public roads it desires either by; a.) statutory authority or b.) easement. 2. The City can extend a private road into another private property without making it public. 3. The City does have the authority to enforce all traffic laws on private roads. ALTERNATIVES - 1. Accept the information. 2. Discuss as desired. 3. Table for further action. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council accept the information. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by __, that the Council accept the information on tlie public/private roads. Ayes _, Hays _. Extension of Private or Public Road October 16r 1989 Page 2 of 2 A) Amendment of the City’s street ordinance as suggested in the attorney's opinion. B) Exercise of its road and utility easement to allow such passage without taking it over. In undertaking this route the City would not be involved in the cost for extending the road, removal of the cul-de-sac or on-going maintenance. The ibsue of who maintains it in this situation, would be the Homeowners' Association of Wear Lane up to at least the cul-de-sac and the property owner to the north maintaining the balance. C) This would make it a public street at least to the cul- de-sac, clarify the City's interest and as noted in the City Attorney's opinion, this would not require the City to compensate the property owner or developer or abutting property owners in any manner for making it public. This however may set a precedent for other private roads in the City. As an alternative, the City may make it a public road that is privately maintained and assessed. 4. 5. Table pending consideration of the plat. Indicate that the City is not interested in any type of extension but its willingness to accept an alternate east/west corridor to serve this property on an on-going basis. Recoaaaendation - It is recommended that the Council would prefer that the owner work with the Homeowners' Association to determine if it can be extended. Failing that it is recommended the City declare it a public street (north/south leg only) and that it be privately maintained with the Homeowners' Association maintaining up to the present cul-de-sac and the new subdivider from there to conclusion of his new cul-de-sac. The cost of the extension being borne by the subdivider plus potential cost of re-oving the existing cul-de-sac when deemed appropraite for removal. Proposed Motion Moved by seconded by that the Council direct the subdivider to work with the Homeowners' Association to determine if satisfactory arrangements can be made. As an alternative, the City would entertain at making it a public street at no cost to the City for either extension, construction, or on-going maintenance. Ayes , nays ___. cc:John Gerhardson, Public Works Director Robert Will N 1 • . • To: Froa: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members 101389.IHD Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato Date:October 16, 1989 Subject: Extension of Private or Piiblic Road Attachaent - A - Public/Private Roads Memo dated 8/21/89 B - Map of Area Issue - In relation to an upcoming subdivision determine the level of Council interest to utilize City powers to extend a private road to serve a plat further north. Introduction - Attachment A was transmitted to Council at a time when a subdivision was being reviewed at the Planning Commission and expected to go to the Council. There was no discussion on the matter at the time. The person doing the subdividing has now acquired additional property from the original o%mer and will be submitting a modified subdivision to the November 20, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Access to this property can either be by an east/west corridor-driveway or a private road outlot to the south. Efforts have been made to limit curb cuts on Old Crystal Bay Road. Directing traffic down to Watertown Road via a street to the rear would be the preferable approach. Discussion - Currently Wear Lane to the south of this property is a cul- de-sac private road over which the City has a road and utility easement. Last year the subdivider approached the original developer of these lots and was quoted a price of $20,000 per lot for access over the private road. (Subsequent to that 3 of the 6 lots on the property have been sold to other parties. They may be more willing to agree to the extension in order to have more people share the cost of maintenance.) As noted in the attorney's opinion of Attachment A, the City does have some alternatives to be exercised in relation to this extension if that is the direction it desires to go. Alternatives - 1.Direct the subdivider to work with the members of the Homeowners' Association to see if an extension is agreeable. 2.Allow a person to extend the private road onto their property from the existing cul-de-sac and allow passage over it through the following: $ S0HIH6 PILB MO. 1289 CITY OF OROMO HOTICB OF PItAHHIMG COMMISSIOM ACTIOM P 0 Box ^ S cVstal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of TOi Robert i Ann Will FROM: Vernice L. White 1042 East Circle Drive 115 Old Crystal Bay Rd N Weyzata, MN 55391 Lon9 Lake, MN 55356 TfFB OF AFFLICATIOil: Preliminary Subdivision DiATB OF MBBTIMGt 6/19/89 VOTB: 4 For 1 Against Planning CoBmd.ssioii reco—ends the following: Denial for reasons noted below HOTBS AMD SPBCIAL COHDITIOHS: 1. Applicant has not provided an approved access to the property. 2. The current proposal that would seek approval of two separate individual private driveways extending from the cul—de—sac on Wear Lane North is not acceptable per current City standards and policies. 3. The current proposal is in complete conflict with the Intent of the Community Mangement Plan of the City of Orono. Your subdivision application will be presented for Council's reviw and action at their meeting of July 10, 1989. Please advise staff by July 5, 1989 if you wish additional information submitted for your application. ■ ^I . T I HIOF THE P^IWIMG COMMSSIOH MEETIHG JUHB 19# 1989 #1289 EGBERT S ARE HILL 115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD . « COHTnniATIOli OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:37 P.M. ~ 8:50 P«N» Mr. and Mrs. Will were present for this application Mr. Will called attention to the letter he had recently sent undeveloped. City said that access to these northern lots come **' extension of Wear Lane North. of^Mr*^^We^^Conunission had no control over the sale or price of Mr. Wear s land. Planning Commissioner Johnson agreed with ^^e applicant in that Mr. Wear was prohibiting the development of Mr. WiJ-i » property. He suggested that the City Attorney s opinion be sought in that regard. not bJou^ht fortS'tJrSorlVnTo™t?on'’thaftLf h.? come back with a plan showing a cul-de-sac from the * request. ::;£3 appicant indicated that he would prefer that the Planning Commission vote on this matter. There were no coiiments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend denial of this application due to the applicant's inability legal access to the northern lots. Motion, Ayes-4, Johnson, Nay Motion passed. fi- Zoning File #1289 November 15, 1989 Page 4 of 4 Options of Action - 1. 2. «n.7derid: “ the followln, finding, m.y be a) All atandard. of the RR-IB zoning di.trlct, subdivision regulations and on-site septic code have been satisfied. access to the property satisfies the intent of the Ccnnprehensive Plan of the City. 'pproval should be based on the following conditions: right-of-way for Old Crystal Bay cieatJd”?ot)!^ * 5400.00 ($200.00 for each newly p'iior?o “.V*lVnd’“lV./a"tir. iit“hin°'t\i ^Sb'U* p^VAy':" responsible for the extension of the *^®®^ ^*"® **°*^^^ applicants norther border * temporary cul-de-sac as shown on revised preliminary plans. Applicant shall also be responsible fSr the removal of existing cul-de-sac within Wear Lane North. pos^^a ^ 1 • tfrVr-^ ^ execute a developer's agreement and Lprcvtsents! '' ‘'>« oie/oStlot A*.'' hhilerlying road and utility easenenta g) Applicants shall execute private road and maintenance ^^® extension of the roadwayis maintained by the benefitted lots. i!i.t*Ilu*t ’h‘.r‘n° °b^"ou^ Vld"c"ryt?al ‘L^^*oa•^.^ approval is based on the City redesignating Wear Lane said^Md with current level of use, maintenance ofsaid road shall be responsibility of benefitted private owners. * ^ Zoning Pile #1289 November 15» 1989 Page 3 of 4 Review of Current Proposal - Please review Exhibit H, the applicants current proposal now shows a fully extended roadway with temporary cul-de-sac to the north border of the property. Note access from Lot 2, Block 2 is now shown along a 30' wide easement along the north border of Lot 1, Block 2. Review Exhibit G, the septic site plan for Lot 1, Block 2. Note the location of the principal septic site. The 30' wide driveway easement will encroach upon the mound test site area. If access to Lot 2 is to be achieved from the extension of Wear Lane North, the access corridor through Lot 1 must be designated as an outlet. A 25' width would be sufficient for a private driveway easement. The on-site evaluator would now have to confirm that the mound system could be realigned further south meeting a 20' setback from the private driveway outlet along the north property line. The City Engineer and staff have reviewed potential access locations along Old Crystal Bay Road. The original subdivision approved access for Lot 2, Block 2 along Old Crystal Bay Road (location of extra access). Unfortunately, the City Engineer's report has not be received as of this writing but he has confirmed that access to Lot 2 can safely be achieved from the most southern access point along Old Crystal Bay Road meeting the 400' side distance required with the 40 mph speed limit. Staff would strongly recommend access for Lot 2, Block 2 be maintained at Old Crystal Bay Road based on the following findings! Impact upon original principal septic test site. 2. Would require installation of a 500'-600' length private drive. The applicant has advised that the former owner of the property who lived in the residence on Lot 2 has moved and a new residence will be constructed on the property. Applicants should advise why the change in access has been proposed. The City Engineer will require extension of the roadway through to the temporary cul-de-sac area with the removal of the existing cul-de-sac within Wear Lane North. A Zoning File 11289 November 15r 1989 Page 2 of 4 The City Council was asked to provide direction for both applicants and staff in solving the access question for this subdivision by first examining the City's rights in the use of private roads with underlying public easements. Prior to the presentation before Council, the City Attorney provided his opinion (Exhibit D, "Regulation of the Use of Private Property") based on State Code, similar case studies, Orono Codes, Comprehensive Plan, and the easement forms adopted by the City. It was the City Attorney's opinion that private roads with underlying easements may benefit and be used by other properties outside of the original subdivision if it was to provide convenient and safe access. Further, he noted this could be achieved by maintaining the road as a private road with homeowners' associations providing for the maintenance and could also be done by declaring the private road public and again with private homeowners' association maintaining said public road. At the October 23, 1989 meeting of the Council, the City Administrator reviewed the applicants' previous inability to deal with the developer of Rolling Meadows in amending the original fee to be charged all future users of the roadway. In light of the City Attorney's opinion, Mr. Bernhardson asked Council to determine just how far they wished to exercise the City's authority/power with the extension of a road through the undeveloped corridor of Wear Lane North providing access to the Interior lots within the Wills' subdivision. Council requested that the applicants be directed to once again attempt to work with the Homeowners' Association of Rolling Meadows so that a private road could be constructed through the undeveloped portion of the platted corridor. If applicant failed in this attempt, the City would consider making Wear Lane North (only the portion running north and south) a public road. The cost of the extension, removal of the existing temporary cul-de- sac and on-going maintenance would be at no cost to the City. Wear Lane North, now a public road, would continue to be maintained by private property owners. The City Administrator's recommendation to Council suggests that the homeowners' association of Rolling Meadows would be required to maintain the roadway up to the temporary cul-de-sac portion and that future owners within the Will subdivision would be responsible for the maintenance of the roadway up to the newly defined cul-de-sac at the north border of the property. Review Exhibit F, Mr. Will has submitted a letter confirming that he has been unable to reach any agreement with the Homeowers' Association of Rolling Meadows. Mr Will requests that the City take whatever f *-eps necessary so tha.. ***:cess can be provided via the future road extension. Vo:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:November 15r 1989 Subject:#1289 Robert & Ann Will, 115 Old Crystal Bay Rd No - Class III Preliminary Subdivision -* Review of Amended Proposal - Renotification of Property Owners ^plication - Subdivision of three-lot plat, Class III Total Area - 8.04 acres Lot 1, Blk 2 - 109,933 s.f, or 2.53 acres dry contiguous Lot 1, Blk 2 - 108,900 s.f. or 2.50 acres dry contiguous Lot 2, Blk 2 - 109,181 s.f. or 2.51 acres dry contiguous Ust of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Planning Commission Minutes 6/19/89 Planning Commission Action Notice Bernhardson's Memo to Council for 10/23/89 Mtg City Attorney's Opinion - Regulation of the Use of Private Property, 7/21/89 Administrator's Sketch of Future Road Plan Extension (Council Mtg 10/23/89) Will's Letter 10/26/89 Septic Site Plan, Lot 1, Blk 2 Applicants' Current Proposal Review of Application - At the Planning Commission meeting of June 19, 1989, the applicants' original three lot plat was denied finding the proposal in complete conflict with the intent of the subdivision regulations and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Planning Commission members may review the minutes and the action notice providing further directions to the applicants (Exhibits A & B). The key issue for this review has been legal and approved access to the newly created lots within the subdivision. The obstacle for the applicants has been the $20,000 per lot charge for use of Wear Lane North. S 11.32 safety and welfare of the citizens presently using the roadway and in the future will be protected and will not be adversely affected by the increased use of the roadway caused by the subdivision. This improvement shall be accomplished prior to final subdivision approval unless the City agrees and the subdivider provides a suitable performance bond to complete the improvements in the subdivider's agreement. B. Access to Improved Public Roadways Over Existing Private Roadways. Wherever the area to be subdivided is to utilize an existing private roadway in order to gain access to the public roadway, such private roadway shall be suitably improved as provided herein above for public roadways. Subd. 2. On-Site Roadways. A. Grading and Improvement Plan. Roadways shall be graded and improved to conform to the City's construction standards and specifications and shall be approved as to design and specifi cations by the City Engineer, in accordance with the construction plans required to be submitted prior to final subdivision approval. B. Topography and Arrangement. 1. Roadways shall be related appropriately to the topography. Roadways shall be curved wherever possible to avoid conformity of lot appearance. All roadways shall be arranged so as to obtain as many as possible of the building sites at, or above, the grades of the street. Grades of streets shall conform as closely as possible to the original topography. A combination of steep grades and curves shall be avoided. Specific standards are contained in the design standards of this Chapter. 2. All streets shall be properly integrated with the existing and proposed system of thoroughfares and dedicated right-of-way as established in the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. 3. All thoroughfares shal^ •) properly related to specific traffic generators such as indu vies, business districts, schools, churches, and shopping centers; to population densities; and to the pattern of existing and proposed land uses. 4. Roadways shall be laid out to conform as much as possible to the topography, to discourage use by through traffic, to permit efficient drainage and utility systems, and to require the minimum number of roadways necessary to provide convenient and safe access to property. 5. The gridiron roadway pattern need not necessarily be adhered to, and the use of curvilinear roadways or U-shaped roadways shall be encouraged where such use will result in a more desirable layout. ORONO CC 457 (4-1-84) S 11.31 C. Lot Drainage. Lots shall be graded so as to provide positive drainage away from all buildings and individual lot drainage shall be coordinated with the general storm drainage pattern for the area. Drainage shall be designed so as to avoid concentration of storm drainage water from each lot to adjacent lots. Subd. 7. Debris and Waste. No cut trees, timber, debris, earth, rocks, stones, soil, junk, rubbish, or other waste materials of any kind shall be buried in any land, or left or deposited on any lot or street at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on a subdivision, nor shall any be left or deposited in any area of the subdivision at the time of expiration of the performance bond or dedication of public improvements, whichever is sooner. Subd. 8. Waterbodies and Watercourses. If a tract being subdivided contains a body of water, marsh, wetlands, etc., or a portion thereof, lot lines shall be so drawn as to distribute the entire ownership of those areas among the fee owners of adjacent lots. The Council may approve an alternative plan whereby the ownership of and responsibility for safe maintenance of those areas is so placed that it will not become the City's responsibility. Where a watercourse separates the buildable area of a lot from the street by which it has access, provisions shall be made for installation of a culvert or other structure, of design approved by the City. Subd. 9. Performance Bond to Include Lot Improvement. The performance bond shall include an amount to guarantee completion of a31 requirements contained in this Section including, but not limited to, soil preservation, final grading, lot drainage, lawn-grass seeding, removal of debris and waste, fencing, and all other lot improvements required by the City. SBC. 11.32. ROADS. Subd. 1. Off-Site Premises; Roadways. A. Access to Improved Public or Private Roadways. No subdivision shall be approved unless the area to be subdivided shall have adequate access from an existing publicly dedicated and opened roadway or on a private roadway open to travel or vehicular use pursuant to an easement between persons or between persons and the City. Such roadway must be suitably improved as required by the City, the State of Minnesota or Hennepin County. In the event tb^ public roadway including but not limited to existing bridges, drainage structures, lighting, shoulders, base, pavement, alignment or site distance, is not suitable to handle the proposed additional vehicular traffic from the subdivision, the subdivider at his expense will be responsible for first improving the public roadway to a standard acceptable to the City, to insure that the health. ORONO CC 456 (4-1-84) Mike Gaffron NovexDber 16» 1989 Page Tvo ADproval of the lot division and plat would impliedly sanction both a continuation and an increase in the trespass JiolStion of^Sectioi*"A\32f“s^i^^ °^l^^the°'w^Code. I urge you to deny these proposals until the applicant provides for adequate and legal access. Mr. White and I will be happy to answer your questions and furnish additional background information. Additional copies or both maps are enclosed for your use. Sincerely, Thomas L. Owens TLO/eh Enc. c: Robert P. White Thomas L. Owens ATTORNEY AT LAW 1512 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5S402 WMSS^ (612)338-2919 III •UflT VIA MESSENGER November 16, 1989 Mike Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono 1335 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 Re:Proposed Plat of "Bayside Ridge" My Client; Robert P. White 4245 Bayside Road Dear Mr. Gaffron: My client is in receipt of the City's Notice of a Planning Commission hearing on November 20 to consider John McDowell's application for a lot division and preliminary plat approval. I am writing on Mr. White's behalf to object to these proposals and express his concerns. Mr. White's homestead lies Westerly and Northerly of the proposed plat. The pertinent boundaries of his property are depicted in green on the map enclosed for your reference. The map also shows in red the pertinent boundaries of the larger tract which was owned by Mr. McDowell as recently as mid-1987. Finally, outlined in orange on the map are most of the boundaries of the homestead of Mr. and Mrs. Allan E. Rezabek. The second map enclosed shows, highlighted in yellow, the approximate location of a recorded driveway easement in favor of the Rezabeks' property and running across Mr. White's property. The owners of Tracts A, B and C of Registered Land Survey No. 748 do not have the right to use the existing driveway, and the owners of Tracts B and C have no legal right of access to Bayside Road. By letter dated October 11, 1988, my client and I put these three owners on notice that "your use of the driveway appears to be unauthorized and without legal basis." The title company which insured access over the White/Rezabek driveway easement has undertaken to esteUslish a legal right of access. 0 I ^ i •.# . fcii •• • I -^pii ri ■T*.* *■ * CITY OF QRONO •rr**v ^ i r* * •« • - « « « • CITY of ORONO Poet OfBct Bax «6 • Crystal Bay. MinoMou 55333 • Municipal OfBcM On the North Shore of fy^e Minnetonka July 28, 1989 Charles Hayssen 4135 Bayside Road Maple Plainr MN 55359 Re: Proposed Subdivision Dear Mr. Hayssen: to ch»?k into this, and a few weeks »90 °n "y a«k ;rs.\"nrp^«^ia"^rst'thal"'thrx?^i^tr30^^^^ north lot line. The survey suggests a proposed let divisirn which will leave&rs;-L-' kr.5ii.r-K" k subdivision, you need to file a formal su form Application, per the attached subdivision applicatr^on form. I would be pleased to meet with you ^.73! subdivision if you have any questions. Please contact 7357 if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, ✓ Michael P. GaL ..... *_-Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator cct^^Bruce Bren Homes, Attn: Bruce, 325 Broadway S, Wayzata 55391 Sathre Bergquist Inc., 106 Broadway S,Wayzata 55391 John McDowell, 4045 Bayside Rd, Jeanne Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Lyle Oman, Field Inspector BUILDING a ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING administration a finance - 473-7358 PUBLIC works - 473-7359 Mr. Michael Gaffron November 9, 1989 Page 2 Rather than delay the approval process xintil this dispute is resolved, we suggest that the Planning Commission and the City Council approve the proposed plat subject to the condition that Mr. McDowell demonstrate legal access over Bayside Ridge Road to County Road No. 84. Please give me a call if you have any questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD By Fr^ric T. Rosenblatt FTR/jek Enclosures cc; Mr. John D. McDowell cb\iicdo«\gaf f ron. 11 r Z OFFICES LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARD •lORCT '.OMM*** SiOMCT »AI»MOWt« hasoco o ntuo. ^ • M.LEM I. •ACHS* 0 rKiwMiM* MOMNS M •wCRMAll* <MtO«OC •CtLLT* C maac M a OArroM OAVtO M COB* •teamcm m atlaum * C maauss a mats * lO«vcll j- MOrcsoOM* gboaoc r «cocA*NOLC. jm •«MA«o a A«Ai«. jm '•€0»IC T «eMM«cArr* •TMOM t. tTAAMS* AOMM M MCAMAM •TCVtN O ObAWTTCR* ^A«CS A OOMCr "AT»«(.CtN M ••AMAW STCA mCM w OAVIOSOM* Stcamcm a utmam * OA««lO C ZAkA* lOAMkAO A «OCASrrt.OCA< ■OMAT CCAA8 AAAAOWA* RCAT I. AlCMCV «H|0M M. MATMAAO* rACOCA<R « HQAAI8 •MMA C. nucmn •AAOcrr J. •ILUM •MCMACI. A ACAJCM* tfUkm^HA C •AAAO* OAVtO A MAn»c« CAJIOt.TN CMA4.MCAS AAMM V AOTM* MOMAY U. OAMAV AMOtUk M aOMMAWH AOMAT A TMAV18* •MMCS O. SULUkAO* XMtAw M riHvCT* LAWAtNCC J. rifto OAV O W AtkLtV maaa t AEirt* OAVtO L. UkkCMAUO OAVie kaatoa SUITE 2300 ISO SOUTH fifth STWCET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5ZAOZ telephone leiEl sss tsoo facsimile (SIS) 33S I6S7 November 9, 1989 MICMAtL C* ^COAEtL V ttOArT 0PMA4 A^ OAfCNSWAO cllcm a AAAOAAtT A VAA WAk^ AMOluk M CNAlSTT MAA« A kiAMAIA ■OEAwaHl aatmaa EOM tMCAAf I.. flAUTM •MCNACL a TArvoA «iOMA« orrsfAGCA tmomas a saaocas ■OAtAT nOLOHTCM TlM«»rMT «CkCN OACeOAT c lAOWW m>AA «. AOMMIA OCAAA 0. STACMkOW ACOCA A. UkA«OM AAHCT BALTOEA AEtMAT ViAO^AtA A. COAC CATMAAlMt BOSCMtC MiCMCkkC A Mill!A TUtOTMT A MCVCASOA /; / •' JiMWirtA H. aaaa SMCI^AO. JA iftAt maac a siHAvoM AWA C MCCLNATTOA ac ataa Ap *^*••€•<1 A SCHACrCA SAOMWtA c COUAO •OAAkO 4 SC muc TI CAAOtTA V WOttAI CCOApC a LtOAAAOiiATt tAA • AATMUA C A •TAeCTitAT* >AAil DC iaa AO tiAAA AAA* AMOS E OCIAAAO I >#88 AAA I M»CM| SOOTT M AATAtCUk ACMArrCA OAAtCL O FOTM OAAitt M. SATOAtUS AA eOWAMfc WBlTCW'S OIPCCT Dial NUMSCn (612) 335-1543 Mr. Michael Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Gaffron: « m represents John D. McDowell. Mr. McDowell owns part enclosing for your information a copy of the proposed plat. I am 3 copy of a Quit Claim Deed dated November 14, 1960 creating a driveway easement for the benefit of Tracts A, B and c' R.L.S. 748. ' ir,^» Mr. McDowell purchased Tracts A, B and c, R.L.S. 748 from Edson and Harriet Spencer in 1987. in connection with that purchase, Minnesota Title issued Mr. McDowell a title insurance policy expressly insuring the driveway easement as a valid appurtenant easement benefiting Tracts A, B and C, R.L.S. 748. Mr. McDowell subsequently sold Tract B and ^art of Tract A to the Hayssens and Tract C to James and Marie Alt. Minnesota Title examined title on both occasions and issued policies to the Hayssens and the Alts insuring the validity of the driveway As you know, Robert White has challenged the validity of the easement. We have referred the matter to Minnesota Title. If it u J t.-- fi-'i* jiij"’' ■•i - 'tt'^ S' "•> '« t\ <'^ ¥<\ ♦-flr r-'. * ■ . ! \\ \ V Mf--'\vj-»; • \ y' /.1 ySTlF,-----------n^oo.^o.orv_____ x'i r«^*4 *’ * L* •, r •w 9. /A \ iiStvisSS f| ?• « • « # • • #V.<'V X / -^ •» • ■'^y.!‘5>' ■ji^V m. • 4^ \ R.. • - lit I ‘8-*- on,«fia/^ N wlib '$1 m V I 15? .•?fc /- ■: ^ /•;/ / •-* y^ / rr.3j ^ /^Li-/ ... r- 7, . L I -ys \e> ■rS****'* A 9' PV. ®Tcd35 y fd* zL*s6t oo*s« n,iofiiMN 9r>•o^c■ - - s» A ■J''' ■ • -I '¥, * •>NOW r u t I < awm f oWD . oO'' iif. i <1 mm DATE 10/23/89 SATCN 002 nmmpiH county ponpEmr iNFowunoN systehPROPERTY OMRS LIST REPCaiT NO. PI43SA01 PAGE 2PROP AOOR OMR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO 04-117-2S 11 0003 0A2A4 OAYSIDC RD vex CAPITAL INC vex CAPITAL INC PO RON 375 LONO LAKE HN 553SAH 58 OA-117-23 11 0004 04050 BAYSIDE RD CAM C0NT4ELL GARY D COMLL 4050 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 553S9 38 06-117-23 12 000304355 BAYSIDE RO vci CAPITAL irx:VCI CAPITAL INCPO BOX 375IQtiQ LAKE m 55354PROP AOOR OMR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 04-117-2S IS 0001 04245 BAYSIDE RO ROBERT P NHXTE ROBERT P NNITE 4245 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PUIN m 55359 38 06-117-23 13 000300038 ADDRESS UNASSIMDVEDA INCVEDA INCPO BOX 375LONG lake MN 55356 38 06-117-23 14 000304045 BAYSIDE RD JOHN D MCOaCLL JOIBI D MCOaCLL 4045 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN m 55S59 PROP AOOR OMR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR SO 06-117-23 14 0000 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGN ALLAN E REZABEK ET AL ALLAN A SNIRLEY REZABEK 4185 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 14 0012 04185 BAYSIDE RD ALLAN E REZABEK ET AL ALLAN A SHIRLEY REZABEK 4185 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 06-117-23 14 0014 04000 BAYSIDE RO RICHARD R STUELANO ET AL R R STUELANO A R L BAI^EAU 4060 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN m 55359 OMR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 06-117-23 14 0017 04105 BAYSIDE RO JOHN D MCOGNELL JOHN D MCDOHELL 4045 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN m 55359 SO 06-117-23 14 0010 04135 BAYSIDE RO CHARLES N A HELEN F HAYSSEN CHARLES N A HELEN F HAYSSEN 4135 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 30 Oto-117-23 14 0019 0416S BAYSIDE RO J A M ALT jai :es a a marie a alt 4165 BAYSIDE RO OROIA) rt4 55359 PROP AOOR OMR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 38 06-117-23 14 0020 00405 TONKAMA RD K A C DEOOLPH III KARL A CHRISTINE DEDOLPH 405 TONKANA RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 06-117-23 14 0021 JAMES N JENSEN JATCS N JENSEN 14851 HSLLIMGTON NAYZATA in 55391 TOTAL BATCH 002 00014 : i * 4 , / i ^ ♦ ** *-£:-v- . V-. ^* : • -•* ■ *-,^ V/-■ y. . - . -. ••• • .* g~.\x ■ ' •■ •.. •' •• - •- i v''*‘ y"* ’* * ' ‘ s'Jv-M J f." -- • t.'*'*• * • • • *• ^'nr • ZiU • • ^ * . • ' i- * • • . •" • k» • ■» -' ,;■■ v: \t-- .-- • \ S/irf V-*. -//. Zf 9$firs 9^ • • <•”>• “ •» N. wrrff;i».rr* • U : A4 •. rk-» V, ; ■ I?-? •* i. ’. K>/:* '••m r, f?ff1 t „ ' ’. **■«"* -«v-» t.*_< -*V.. j • *•» - *«- * AlVEirR.FR :^ :. ...;COONTY* SURVErc ^ ; r? VI .v-v .• .-r • » ...•\ '••.•“■V. n ■ n.%•j . •« •. ••• . .. 4 » • ** MIH] 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. IDN MATERIAL HBCBSSARy FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 * (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ X Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - -- 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class J, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Pina? Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) $150.00 250.00 300.00 + 20.00/Lot 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Applicant must have all subny/ttals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetiings of the Planning Cewunission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled me.Cing, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Date Date !Sri > o 'jx') / f Receipt - #-i %/>«0£>LC. /'I / ** / L-----^aMs’- 41CITX OF OROHO - SOBDIVISIOH propcrtt location V iJ I 6 S" R/^ US. fT)tSite AddressSite Address__3::Z- -^- - '' ' - - - -w ,/o_ . ^ , U ' 0 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _J^- - - - - - - - - - - Please check one - Property ------ abstract or —l^torrens? ^.ttach legal description _to^_applioation^_____________---------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Phone (\ — APPMCAHT .. Name ^ ---------------------- ^ . £0 Cityt ZipsJ£±J^l:?::- JIQ.QRAddress ____1-------------------------------- :iSi;'ardI««e«"harapplicant) Phone (home)-------------oa^^AM; ’joSi Name Phone (work) i- ."So)____• r Vnl 77w3mII/ u-Vi iTv'4 . *.y\^ U t f V/ Address: ----------------------------------- (attach list if more than one^ City:Zip: existing I mid use Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) ,!) J£SL Z73^ Present Zoning District_^ ^ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Totalr all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)__ _ _ _ __ proposal v/ 1/ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement subdivision for New gilding Sites 3 V.»>4 ^1^4 rt Number of Building Sites: Pi^oposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Pi^oposed Use: (check) w J.n Existing Units ■ New Units Total Units R y Units per _ _ Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential " Other (specify)______- - - Zoning Pile 11475 November 16r 1989 Page 4 of 4 Based on the above, staff would recommend approval of the pi^oposed subdivision based on the following conditions* 1. On the plat drawings, Bayside Ridge Road shall be designated as a private road outlet# "Outlet B", Outlet B is intended to remain in private ownership, and be privately maintained. Because this plat effectively only creates a fourth building site where three building sites already existed, no upgrading of the private road is required as part of this subdivision. 2. Lots 2 and 3 shall be served by private access driveways via Outlets A and B. (Does Planning Commission feel that there is any justification to allow access for Lot 2 directly to Bayside Road? No word from Hennepin County on their position as of this writing.) 3. Standard Park Dedication Fees shall be paid for Lots 2 and 3. 4. Standard Drainage s Utility Easements to be shovm on the plat drawings. 5. Prior to filing of the subdivision, applicant shall satisfy the City Attorney that proper legal access is provided to the property. Zoning File #1475 November 16, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Mr. White has indicated verbally to City staff that he does not intend to cooperate in validating the existing easement, and would prefer that the new parcels in addition to existing residences at 4135 and 4165 be served through some other corridor. If the applicant ultimately fails to gain access over the existing driveway, a revised subdivision would likely have to be reviewed by the City. Discussion ~ RLS #748 was filed in 1958. Some time in the late 1950s or early 1960s, the residence at 4185 Bayside Road was constructed, along with the driveway within Tract F, which at th’t time was the Tearse property. Mr. White granted the Tearses an easement across White's property to get from Tract F to Bayside Road. Some time after that, Tearse granted an easement (over the White property easement) to t.W. Spencer to serve his properties known as Tracts A, B and C. Mr. White claims that Tearse had no right to grant the additional easement over White's property. Staff discussed with the applicant early in the subdivision process that the City would require a 25' outlet for the existing private road. It is anticipated that at some future date, the additional 25' to create a standard 50' private road outlot, would be dedicated from the adjacent property. Applicant was advised that the City would require interior access for both Lots 2 and 3, hence applicant is providing an additional Outlot A along the north end of Lot 3, to serve Lot 2. The west line of Lot 2 then becomes the front line and the lot width standard is met. The alternative would have been to make Lot 2 a flag lot. Staff Rec<indation - The applicant is providing a private driveway outlot adjacent to the area of the existing access road. Because this is a two lot subdivision. City code does not require construction of a new private road. Both new lots abut an interior access road as required by code. Each new lot contains in excess of the required two acres, each lot exceeds the required 200’ in width, ana each lot has suitable house locations and tested drainfield sites. The lot line rearrangement incorporated into this plat leaves adequate setbacks and potential for septic system expansion as required by City codes. Zoning File #1475 November 16r 1989 Page 2 of 4 3. The applicant is proposing a north/south division line to create two building sites. The applicant noted that the ridge line and location of drainfield sites suggests that the proposed house locations are centrally located within each proposed lotr and that an east/west lot li:.w would result in less functional lots due to the slope of the north half of the lot. Ir order to provide interior access to Lot 2, applicant proposes a 25' outlot to the proposed "Bayside Ridge Road". Applicant would prefer to serve Lot 2 with a separate driveway from Bayside Roadr but it is questionable whether the County will approve an access site on Bayside Roadf especially if an alternate access is feasible. Remember that Orono Code requires that all newly created lots be served by interior roads whenever possible. 4. Applicant has provided a 25' corridor for what is jhown on the plat as "Bayside Ridge Road". This corridor generally parallels the private driveway that serves four existing residences. Although not sho%«i on the survey, the existing driveway location is west of this outlot. on the Rezabek property (see Exhibit G). Staff would anticipate that an additional 25' outlot could someday be added to the west of this proposed outlot, for private road purposes. 5. Primary and alternate drainfield sites have been tested in each of the proposed new lots. The Hayssen property has alternate drainfield sites to the south and west of the existing system. The McDowell residence at 4105 Bayside Road exceeds 5 acres in area and appears to contain a number of possible drainfield sites. Alternate site testing is not required. All of the sites tested require mound systems. 6. The neighboring property owner to the north and west, Robert White has challenged the validity of the easement across his property out to Bayside Road (see Exhibit I). The City Attorney has preliminarily reviewed the concerns and has suggested that, since Minnesota Title Insured the access easement on file, it would likely be up to Minnesota Title to take whatever steps are necessary to provide access to the affected properties. The City Attorney advises that any approval of the proposed subdivision be conditioned upon the applicant providing suitable documentation that the access issue has been resolved, prior to filing of the division. /. Tot Planning Cononission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 16# 1989 #1475 John McDowell s Charles Hayssan# 4045/4105/4135 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning Dietrict - LR-IA, Single family laVeshore residential, unsewered Application - Lot line rearrangement and subdivision to create one additional building site from three existing tax parcels. Datex Subject: List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C “ Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G “ Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Application Plat Map & Area Hap Property Owners List Proposed Plat Drawings Survey with Locations of Existing S Proposed Houses & Driveways Survey Noting Proposed Lot Areas Map of Area Property Ownership Air Photo Letter from Applicant’s Attorney Res Access Letter to Hayssen dated 7/28/89 Pertinent Pacts -2,, This proposed plat accomplishes two purposes: A) Rearrangement of lot line between the Hayssen and McDowell homestead properties. B) The remaining 6+ acre portion of Tract A, RLS #748, is being split into two 3+ acre building sites. 2. Note that, per Exhibit E, Hayssen's line is approximately 22' from the house constructed in 1988. The setback approved on the site building permit for the house indicated a setback of 34 . The property owner later pivoted the house around the northeast corner of the garage and made arrangements with McDowell to purchase an additional piece of property, but his did not come to staff's attention until after the house wSs finished, per the letter of 7/28/^B9 (Exhibit J); Jhe proposed subdivision leaves a side setback of approximately 100'. The rearrangement also places Hayssen's septic system completely within his property boundaries, while maintaining the appropriate setbacks. PUUnnHG COMMISSIOM MBBTIII6 - MOHDAYr NOVEMBER 20# 1989 COBTIHOATIOll OF ACTIO* ITEMS - 12. #1478 Robert Ritchie, 3572 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Dae Permit/Commercial Site Plan - Public Hearing 15. #1479 Doug Williams & Lecy Construction Inc., 1020 Tonkawa Rd Variances ~ Public Hearing 16. #1480 Ed # Gerta Toth, 725 Old Crystal Bay Rd S - Vacation of Drainage Easements - Public Hearing 17. Approval of 1990 Schedule of City Meetings ADDITIONAL ITEMS 18. December 18, 1989 Meeting of the Planning Commission has been cancelled 19. Navarre Redevelopment Meeting, Saturday, November 18, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Freshwater Institute, 2500 Shadywood Road 20. Approval of Planning Commission Minutes of October 16, 1989. 21. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the December 11, 1989 Council Meeting. ADJOOR] PLMmiMG COMNISSIOM MBBTIIIG NOHDAT, aOVEMBBR 20, 1989 7s00 P.N 1275 miam road soon - caoow cn. COOHCIL KBPRBSEHTATIVS - Edward Callahan ATTBHDAHCB PUBLIC HBARIH6 1. 7:00 p.m. #1475 John McDowell, 4045, 4105 & 4135 Bayside Rd Preliminary Subdivision ACTIOH ITEMS Review of these items will commence between scheduled public hearings. 2. #1289 4. #1481 5. #1470 6. #1471 7. #1472 8. #1473 9. #1474 10. #1476 11. #1477 Robert Will, 115 Old Crystal Bay Rd N - Preliminary Subdivision - Review of Amended Plan - Renotificaticn by Mail 3. #1465 Gerald McCourtney, 1055 Ferndale Road West - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing Gerald McCourtney„ 1055 Ferndale Road West - After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing Dan & Ruth Parten, 4300 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing Daryle Uphoff, 2699 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Dave Carlson, 1960 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Jacquelynn Kelly, 2056 Shadywood Road - After-the-fact Variances - Public Hearing Continued to January 16, 1990 Planning Commission Meeting Donald Belawski, 1695 Concordia Street - Variance - Public Hearing David 6 Suzanne Prass, 1065 Linden Lane - Variance - Public Hearing Dr. Bob Whitesel of Vineyard of the Lake Inc., 850 West Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing - Applicant has requested this application be withdrawn. •'.in ril'' *1184 ■vjrt 11. •% •o rf : T?v' b.-*hroo!n a.ldition ^tVuc^urc ^wU f °cr^^ ;;'o The'"xi Jin^ub^t.n^^ \^^tTtl.JV.rrcnt •r th« lot at the indium of 200 feet of width with r^rfc^'rliirWrb-aiJ: ^°oJ^cc“pVt/son.. -h LK-IB wU, re,u^-d wj^^ -.•'.indardj?. Th, l.»..horc ^.lUicn. .U ^ TellT^^7cn%%%\f Js :l’Sc/.‘^a;n';^Mna\‘;7‘4'^»P -5 .’eVJ. tilr.l^e set.ac. as aWay. 4 is determined from the defined rip rapped snoreline. Soto from that sa?ie survey referenced above. Exhibit E, that the new iddit'ions do not encroach the average lakeshore setback line. The application will also call for a hardcover variance of 2^9 s.f. or ’.5% for the proposed improvement of the subject proper y. A) is the final total of 17.5* in hardcover too excessive for this property? B) What areas of o-istinq hardcover can be reduced to minimize irrpnet? 1. Turnaround area within drive is an improvement that must remain for saf<' aco‘'SP onto West Ferndale. A. m Are ther»' other areas - deck - sidewalk?? .V'\ccri’cV tne 0-75 protected area. Total Area = 32,670 s.f. • 0-75* « 16,800 s.f. or 51.4* •'* •* ... pAA”.riiAorAi;As"oV£wHo£s^^^^^^^ area for th'* tiardcc-er on the property. . AV.A ,;r A-orAA% *• • •* »• •• • • ^ C Dick Bmm, Citjr AMiiistntOf Hnk Miiieh. Zonli« AiMiilstntor Oetdb«r •• 1976 * TO: FRM: WOEx SUBJECT: Nwrlc* HdOattiWf - 1065 ____ u i^*Dniiii«a prcM«i with nwlfh^ OM Hawick - 105S Fnntel* Rood . V X think w* n tlftr h»t«» ail !*■ not too sun If wo should Iti tnil«^^^ Miw wo got temlood,^history of tho propomos Involwod ad lot you noko ywr mo X. April 1971 . EiyMItloaJM 1972 - rooownndid 2 lots aly •> Minm wlthdra holf of $100 mint fa. 2. 3. I vltfidTOf fliA MmBHA -------------------------------------------- ^ No xooofd in mo, bat It. MCCofftoy hoa lOBC^od PWPfg];; Sopt«*or 22, »n. ho cbtalnod o pondt a torn iho ftw .oifUt^ naninf Coadooioi Hiproal aginaad 4. Amat 14,\lf72 • Ooacil Lttod S£Si%^, •••• V- ‘ lot Idhdioiril ‘ w^Joct t ______U, W2 - Lottor fton Sctollor tolM^sssarssr •* •* Noa^ 16, 1972 - Uttor fra NoComoy to SchoUor ■jjgjortBg ti^^yMd4^ Ssiiu^g ^^sjg-gaiLaag^^ cMTPisf Md dnlra to oonfeni to oil ofuoMOMn . 'V j • of opRlleotla a mo.) . ^ / '* mm V... V-; <!iirj5SSWf <»'-■'■. *• fish’s i££5.*2235 SgSX'S.'S^. “• ssu*-4TniisroS:^^____________ _ •'§ opproal of U. Aiaat 27, 1973 - Appwad tovldc arlaea oiAjoet to MeCifflrty't finol pint being mod ad oowogo systa opproal. V i. • 'V :«•, vi^ - : ri • * - < • «., ,,.• fteirice McCafftejr P«ge 3 • 10$S Ftindale And N»st ► til 2S. Miy 10. 1974 • Mhd ttm Manton to Co^ stating R.L.S. far NoCafArar s^Avlaim is ooi^oto and res4r for Oaaicil action. Itawsnr, tiia ■» I *• I proper ^rlar «id ha idshell on £ilo» »• hn^ Sjyyofesd roqidrenmts. (he tiling is tiiat a wtvsjr prooably nn I will point out tfr. Skup*) 26. Jhie 14, 1974 - Lettw fton IfcOifft^ to SehoUor Intonaing hin of portodic _ . . in stiucture • feels it iniaporunt. 28. Ailr 23, 1974 • Utter fton Mltdiell to Sdiallor Stating lit* HMting. 29. tgoit 26, 1974 • Uttar fim HdCaOnf to Mtdkall M 30. October 9, 1974 • Uttar fton----- (Another dtage • tiibar letaiaSag m31. Nip S, 1974 • Building pendt Issood HcChAer hin the oontxaeCor - (eeet oatlnefea ehnia U ! 32. mf S, 1974 • Site plfli with peadt aspUn^ 41* ftm lakealme. (Actual satbaek la autf * has beoi addsd to stncturs with applicatian m rsoeid raqusstiat Hie following Is a-------,-----------------------------—— with which Nr. IfeCafftef is now having a draUaBS ptoblaa. 1. Nr. MR 2. Movashor 18, 19p « Owiy's Oinstnietian ________________ posed leeatim to^^fci iafcsihw>ir«Mi of our BDntm .. MliBotaika. Ha thn siteittod m gppUeartan Ibr varlaHi «i HgoNfetr It, liPS.T; , \ • , *• • • **40 ^ • * •> s' • ■ aaoU* ' 3. 4. 197S • Owaidl weuSdThe italning approval of vtflMoe,^ contiad it. iSia tim he had gndlBi gUns B the Blau aid 1—fit atslr Utlbiwaii I ^ srsS&’SJTfflSlfUlXOlHM nUI W nu CMflOifTI OX vniMp ^ . . a ^ V- '•ff * .*:» ’ 04^ ^ ^ Estinatad value Is H0t,000. .. *;• V. f,*i -1... Maurice M£affrey P«ge 4 1065 Famdale Itoed Wast 5. Jmmrf 1976 • A|iplicctioB revlslens as show « iwr i|ipc««d befbie WjMlafOai^iw^i^ T^Tertin!rtaKLufs JS^roB McOsffrof*s.IVTUXom m3 mow w i—w wlls bwww properties tor directing drsinage mmf 7. JmuaxT 12» W76 • Oomeil sppwwd dxainife plan subjwt to foUoHliig: (a) Plan allow only aomy. fill and grodini tetrad pt. hoose oonstnctlcn. (b) Natunl fill. * r OV.V,, <., , . V IjBM loft In ;aatnral(e) aty bigiaaor's approwl (d) - • ‘ •“ "RKaiiiJ istato. ,C.» A**** ‘ f ' Sineo grodinf MoCaffteyia Ifr. laww wd X flnaUr wt vift Nr. NDGtfftay Ift. Kaeick tt t(00 oJb^iiiii S, 1976. iOao paoat wvo tte ftU«^ - 2f*^!f*2ftl2!rGory G^rlol. cantmctor*a wginaar and tw of hio floMil JiN ttorlM^, V'-; V lino aa it now iwa throogi I NeGilf MsCaffrey one Toealwed as yot). -------.—- V- (i, > -rj ■■ ulft% IIBQ vffTnVi ■HV • WtMmwWT Imm wOHAtt ImIW MMSNWn .> •*!Gabriel, the oontreetorTsmyor, did leeaM the oilgM fty^ot tbo.fino ^ node the survoy that was sidmittad tor Hawick's appiicatiOB..;;'(I hope no lO not lifkio ftr any dnaages haw.) V .N '.. , • * jwr •» -' • i* * ^ * • •• • *'4 * • • -r *v*A«ie>v sv, i • -k. •- •■ . • y ■ • ^., . •• •• • i’ V - * i, •> . ■• ’■.• ^ I • *♦ «-♦ e -k ‘ :»1 LCr.CtIO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JAMDAIUf 12» 1976 P«9« < area wa« due on September 30, 1975, end m of the tine of thle writing, you man application nor have you been granted aucn a license* SKI TONKA LETTER (Continued) Previously, MiXe Seheller of the City of Orono, IS?orSS% of this fact and sent you • cow of the ordinance regulating ski areas, ^reover, it is ny understanding that V®“ ^f OL^rating or oontesvlate * ?®Siiyour ski area for which no.conditioMl^e permit has been granted. X i^iewnt, in order to operate any part of the i*i area, you must first have a license. **®5*®y**» in orde. to operate on the new portion of . ski area, you nust have aIf YOU do not nake your application for tw 1>. iHs, th. City -111 “9 Jo« for Yioution of «>•you from using that portion of the ski area. If you have any questions, please contact me. Erd of letter. Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to grant •Jicense to Ski Tonka for Phase •!, which i« original ski area. Motion, Ayes (4) - Ways (0). SKI TONKA LZCBNSB ■ i S5!'”Ji bTSJiSir* and followed up with legal enjoinment. SKI TONKA - PRASE 2 Dutler moved, Welsh seconded, that the request for Kingdom Hall for a license to park a mobile home on the premises at 3655 Togo Road, fr^ January 11 through January 18, 1976 only, ne approved* Motion, Ayes (4) • Nays (0)* LZCBMSB Kingdom Ball XfoSSftT^ftj c”Sii2S ’tS.?"ri?’o5n^Sr‘“' IKt F.n-.i. loss West Pemdale Siis****** width^f 200*. ^ "street setback*^- 50*. (4) Side- yard setback - 30". ThU parcl 1. 175’ »W. at tha point th. *~lll"2 in proposed to be built and consists of 0s75 acres or 32,670 sq. ft. (Continued) a*. ^ k-a._ _ 4* 1 r •i ' ir* rOUTICIL ITEETHIG HELD JANUARY 12, 1976 . fr. 11 wing variance* vould require approval! Aren - 54,450 *q» lot width - 25* . Side "ntback ~ 15 . Stre »ck - 33* ho proposed location vould howoyar» mt tha 3* lakeshore setback requirs«*nt. Page 7 VARIANCE 1055 Weet Femdale Road (Continued) one conditions to be cats and on-site disposal design, anning Coneiisslon Meeting - December 3, 1975 lie commission ®J hl*the ^plication due to the ®*“J?«,Sinonail sise o£ the lot, ^cauee and was available and >>•«■«•» ,55?J5®?!rfolloving n single separate ownership provided the coiiowing 'ondltlons are nett . Percolation tests meet approval o£ the . The^b5lSng permit cite specific restrictions on buildi^, ^reding and tree removal and must be 75* from the . In addition to the variances gog«**^*°»* 23% variance on hardcover be •*^®***®*_^_That the deck construction, as shown on tne plan, within 75* of the lakeshow, allowed provided it is of open construction with rock beneath and that no concrete be ueede 'Jr.nning Commission Meeting - January 5, 1976 '''try's Construction Cos^ny presented a nd drainage plan for the propem. The plan ncluded swale* in the front yard area . •’.vert drainage away from the }•**•• * ^-11 in the back lot area was Included fortte r.rpose of diverting drainage •ff®** 2*® nto a natural ponding area on the other side o ho street, instead of it flowing into we Ujacent low area of a n«i9hboring property. »e •3n stated that 35 truck loads of fill *'®®J® ®® .-'oded on the whole site of which 5 'uld be needed within the 75 lakeshore setback n order to make a 25* taper from the house. hey also noted that there used to be cabin* “i the site and when they were talwn down We -.tural drainage was destroyed. The C^lssiw -'It that the retaining wall could be the neans ' blocking a natural ponding area. (Continued) y i1 t * • ♦ u j. I f. f i: i i ^ i . f :'v'V:5 .V'.i • - *• ! • ■ V :‘:-4 .i •:^K- i i ■ S a#w*«.■.iff ., - ^ ■ •. J ¥■Z’4. > ' • / «> Iv Iv ! ■ ;• ■: ■ «• • f J • >. -.• ‘ ■ i' ‘•I :v • « 'v£V . •*.. * .*• . I "* V. • *• •• ;r. 1 “ ' V •• • \- ■ i • c. •• *.* ■ • • V '• ’ .-j _____0-0^ f^^OS.e£i> C/'uctv«£i«s.. PoAtrc/ii cf^ ^t/scj , ______i___ ___ftcmr/oo fT> _Te=' pt cfi. _i__ : •; >r- * ■• -..■‘v'Vj. « • >v. •.*.?:-I ;r>^^ :r *7 ’ >■ •: > - V I ’ ,i . I ’ . > j T- - - ’ 'if—-•— 4* ^ ♦ , ' V '.'• rf ■ V/'i >' ■'. I '■;'' ■•*___________ ■■ .•■■;.'•-v! * •V 'vi'* •V y . • » •41 • ‘n- __• . • •' j I <:; . * ■; ‘--A'..*1: r -iry • . . V* •f —: >.• i' I?--------it u »i.*=»7 * 7. i j i. !; (I A* >>•/s,o___ /S. ^ /7.S' X Zo/z___ C * /0.!S »» t> ’ fo >* 1 /s,___ 7?^ * /r, ^x7//2-_ P s _____ — H— ‘♦i" .T______ )75' .. ' ........= ’7S"7 -2:^. 1 oWr' P/c*^osefck t ■U,^oo » .. • •• * . 7 ‘ •.. 7'S’r2SD fific^ose^ .^.... 1r',/fouler (^Pee. e^r 44-t. r^^-t$x/zr7Aic^ '... s?e>-^ *yo3^- /o99 ^/sb. i!- --ir -/9-3S-V&_=„V7S ’a> • . ^ y . . .... ,, ;! ! ,.v H-., ■>• 0--7S ' - t^~T5rTt(e.ACeS ■ ■ ■ ^ ~/ 2- *^/4» -‘//V »/<»2_ - jj-(rccnoio'^ S ^ - C0 It ^ * WM-VS-S (D (/ffxc5>4 r 2*72 “ y.X. ^ — ..................... • —• ^ ^ —'7 -- V j-* Cl iV" / 3 2 i A . ^T>>«4U©AJAe/ ^2,7xa3'^ + ^ixp»a6.^-#>-^/;v*">2<--^ *■/67/ s.7*; « . ^ 4 I *t»/uxts ; 2-^/^J eK.ok = 2“V • f .1 •• * .•* * i \ V. ' . .* •’« : ,.t‘ • % > * • *,* : . r. * ‘ \. 'V\ • t. ..’. >**.'V i** 4 ' :' -V *: * . •■, • . • - :------=”7^0^^ i I ___ ?3o„^ .-r/5',8lO ^Jrl^.^.O.% . . ftf^rosef^ 7S--2so" .............Ih l ! ■ i .• A ■‘ \ .V • I •. t ' :.• -• ^V‘ .'.‘iV)' . j % • •«.V ‘ -^v-r;r«i. y :'' \:. . l T- . •JS\ ••.■ i •■ a'— •’ • --.I ,.•. ^ *C-‘ '"V- - •\ .\,N UKt UUNETOMKA I ■ \*fJOTB ' lOCATiC>*^ C?F \ '^, yS'sertACJi Is. > ■ fK>TTEri> aa^l/i'TlTNT •iA>it^ 2w»2vyg^5<s •:k- fiA^1>co\Je^ ;f^oPO-s/V« ■: /£> S.HAt>eb A^-^A •«' - V. >•«. 'A-T* •“ "AT• •w»-« .!«I—,»» •*• . •••»• .• •—• % • — .•n •• ^••••»« «— •«••• • w. .k-1'r, i« A^.*i.i-.ki^r..i. • .. CAMBrmji To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:October 11, 1989 Subject: #1465 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road - Variance - Public Hearing Soning District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, sewered Application - Request for variance to increase hardcover in 75 250' zone. Fence height variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit F Exhibit G C D E • •• •• •• Exhibit H - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Existing” Site Plan Submitted Proposed" Site Plan Submitted Proposed Fence Elevation View Submitte’ House Elevations Submitted with Previous Variance Request Surveys/Chronology of Hardcover Development of Property: a) Variances approved in 1975 Existing as of 7/21/87 Additions approved 1987 Additions approved 1988 Applicant's submittal 1989 proposal Hardcover summary b) c) d) dl) e) f) Exhibit 1 - Documentation from Prior Variance Requests Pertinent Facts - 1.Applicant is proposing to create a circle driveway with two entrance points to West Ferndale Road, and also some additional sidewalks. Hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone already exceeds the 25% limitation. Additionally, applicant is requesting a street/yard fence height variance to allow a fence with pillar height of 5.5'. 2.This property has been the subject of numerous variance applications through the years. A brief chronology follows: August 1972 - Property owner Maurice McCaffrey granted conditional approval to split 1065 West Ferndale Road into two lots. Although the property was zoned for 1% acres. Council granted conceptual approval to create this new 0.75 acre lot. Zoning Pile #1465 October 11# 1989 Page 2 of 4 August 1973 - Property buyer Odd Rovick granted variances to allow a street setback of 15' from the 30' standard then in effect* conditioned on McCaffrey's final plat being filed* on an acceptable septic design and on the condition that the standard (at that time) 50' lake setback be maintained. The plat was ultimately filed as an RLS in July 1974. January 1975 ~ New 2 acre zoning came into effect. Lot had not been built on as of this date. November 1975 - Application for building permit by Gerry's Construction who was informed that variance had expired. Application for variance renewal filed same day. December 8, 1975 - Council approval of variances for lot width; lot area; 15' side setback variance; 33' street setback variance (17' setback proposed); and a "23%" hardcover variance. Note that hardcover was also a new factor as of the 1/1/75 zoning code changes. Exhibit H-a is a copy of the original approved site plan* with hardcover calculated by today's methods. Approved in the 0-75' zone was a portion of a deck comprising 1.44% hardcover. In the 75-250' zone* 31.8% hardcover was approved. No sidewalks were shown. July 1987 - A survey of the property as it existed on 7/21/87 indicated hardcover (as calculated by current methods) of 3.4% in the 0-75' zone* and 33.2% in the 75-250' zone. The apparent increase in the 75-250' zone was due to a driveway area slightly larger than that originally anticipated. The increase in the 0-75' zone was due to a circular wood deck which was constructed rather than the rectangular deck originally proposed. A greater portion of the existing deck was in the 0-75' zone (Exhibit H-b). September/October 1987 - Council approved additional hardcover in the 0—75' and 75—250' zones. 0—75' increased to 3.5% with a southerly expansion of the house wall near the deck area. The 75-250' zone increased to 36.8% with that same southerly expansion as well as a new bathroom addition at the northwest corner of the house. Also* sidewalks not previously shown as hardcover were now included in the calculations (Exhibit H-c). Zoning Pile #1465 October 11, 1989 Page 3 of 4 November 1988 - In discussions during the renewal of the previous 1987 variance, applicant requested additional hardcover for a 160 s.f. deck in the 75-250' zone with concurrent reduction of sidewalk and driveway in that zone, which was approved conditioned on there being no net increase in hardcover. However, note that the "reduction of driveway from 600 s.f. to 420 s.f." proposed per the letter from James Credit 11/16/88 would have effectively eliminated all but a 16' wide section of driveway to serve a three stall garage. The applicant may have assumed that gravel aggregate for parking would not be considered hardcover. This was not a correct assumption then or now. The current proposal requests 43.3% hardcover in the 75-250' zone, an increase of 6.5%. Also, the applicant has removed the circular deck and requires a variance to replace it. The circular deck would be slightly decreased to yield a reduction to 2.9% in the 0-75' zone (Exhibit H-e). A 8umma.ry of the hardcover history of this property is attached as Exhibit H-f. 3. Oiscnssion - As Of this writing, the applicant has not provided a statement of hardship for the additional variance request. The applicant's agent, Jerry Wenkus, has noted the safety and parking aspects associated with providing additional driveway hard surface, and staff would note that reduction of driveway to the 420 s.f. level to meet the requirements of the 1988 approvals probably does not leave a functional driveway situation. The applicant has contacted the Public Works Director regarding approval for a second access to the property. Whether that access is approved by the Public Works Department should not be a factor in consideration of the merits of this hardcover variance request. However, note that the original variances in 1975 were granted partially based on the low traffic volumes of West Perndale Road (see Council minutes of August 27, 1973). Also realize that the road shoulder in front of the house "No Parking" not for traffic safety purposes but to eliminate fishermen parking. The "No Parking" signs could be removed if the property owner requests. Leaving the driveway and back-up apron as they existed in 1987 would allow approximately the same amount of off-street vehicle parking as the current proposal, hence the circular drive does not result in significant additional off-street parking area. Zoning File #1465 October 10, 1989 Page 4 of 4 The fence would appear to be relatively open in this location, since West Ferndale Road is not considered a major thoroughfare nor is it a MSA funded road, maximum allowable fence height without a variance would be 3.5*. Staff Itei; o—endation - Given the history of hardcover increases on this property, the current request would seem to be a significant increase with little in the way of hardship offered by the of the request. Also, given the history of the current remodeling over the last two years, a la^k of good initial site planning seems apparent. Planning Commission should address the issues in any recommendation for approval or denial of variances requested: 1. Should the circular dock be allowed to be reconstructed, leaving a total of 2.«>% hardcover in the 0-75' zone? 2. Should a fence height variance be granted to allow the fence as proposed? 3. What degree of hardcover variance is appropriate for the d’-iveway area? Should the circular driveway be allowed? If not, would Planning Commission previously existed to be retained, including the back up apron? 4. If the pre-existing driveway layout is retained, hardcover percentage will increase above appr^'vod in 1988. Per Exhibit H-e, hardcover excluding sidewalks could be as follows: House, deck (items A thru M) Less portion in 0-75' zone Pre-existing driveway (per Exh. H-b) 75-250' Net 5,461 s.f. 487 s.f. 1,004 s.f. 5,978 s.f. - 37.7% 5. How much additional hardcover sidewalks (410 s.f. or 2.6% is snown on Exhibit H-c}? I . CITT OF OROHO - VARIAHCZ APPLICATION Receipt- Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) * Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #146 PROPERTY LOCATION m53320.COQl ROl 702:C 09/22/3 CITY OF URONOSite Address O, Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) _//7- ~^ Please chec)c one - Property abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. RECUPT-THUm YOU^fnCJSlO. cool APPLICANT Phone (home) Name LrT'C>_______ Phone (wor)c) Address City; ) OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) — 2^^:^o Name Phone (wor)c) ^ "2^9 Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City: Zip:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired 4/^'t (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property /A Residential Other (specify) OBSCRIPTION OF R)Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; J-c^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width m Hardcover Setbaclc Variances ( Other Front Side Rear) ■:p ^b^^ # at- 2 BMtDSHIP Describe ^lndue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DBSCRIPTIOH OP ONUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIOHS Describe unusual property conditions pre*^enting compliance with Zoning Code Requirements t required submittals 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped; legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sigr, this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this-application, and certifies that the information supplied i;r/true an,^correct^to the best of his/her Jcnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OffNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the propercy by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of tnis request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Coiu.cil. If an applicant is xinable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning ' Office of this change prior to the meeting. ReC‘ CITY OF OROMO - VlkRIABCB APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional varia Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original applicatior After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1465 PROPBRTT LOCATION Site Address ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^-^oo Please check one - Property abstract or __ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT Name One? - Phone (home) C^"/c/'— 4> Phone (work) (ll? Address*3^/ City; Zipt<r<T^3 / t (if different than applicant) Phone (home) •3—2-7^0 Neune Phone (work) Q "2^9 ^ Address:City; Zip • Date Property Acquired 44-«t (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT DSE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property /A Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQl Estimated Construction Cost $ \ I Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Other f^/£A^(2£^ Front Side Rear) IROSBIP ^ ^ Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DBSCRIPTIOB OF OBOSOAL PROPKRTT COMDITIOBS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SBQOIRBD SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). , ^ 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date__- - - - - - - -- APPLICANT'S SIGHATORB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees^ and/or unusual expenses incurred in reiriew of thls^apipllcatlon, and certifies that the information supplied i^^^rue an^^^orrect >to the best, of his/her )cnowledge. ^ ^ ^ " / Applicant's Signature Date OHIIBRS SIGNATURE j « ..w The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification oJ|/this request.:icm^^o^th^ Owner's Signature ^_ _ _ _ Date _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held ^ third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. / '5>\ 'tic >* -f » i • r '.' '* 'wi*X -*. / •.v’-v'! 8 •? V = 5 24 -'m / V r,^*,. an* oecot*. rtcar^ BA-S- %4\ / / wr« Oft Lot ^'jy^ Ji y-v<\b r»-»- » ••v lot lOt \ n :o MINNETONKA S®=-S' OWNS BAY)it '-. . 17.R.23 ^ •-4- . ..k J I Ml lATI t7/t7/ir iATOI til Hi»MPIN COUKTY M)^RTY INrOimATIQN SYSTEH mmMVI CBMtS LIST ttporr HD. wiMSkniRACE Imm mmCRtm NAHE TAXFAYfll HAnE/AM St tf-117-ES AS mt•itTt feuoau n utOQOtXCN lOUiY ETAL COOOtlCM UBtIV ItTt M fEmtlAlE to HAY2ATA 111 SSZn It it-117-n AS sm Ali7t FERNDAU SO H HCrSIY n SAASS Hctsn M SAASr lOAS H FESliUU BO HAYZAYA lAI SSSSIU iE-117-tS AS St§5 St iE-ll7-tS AS MAANAMi NEMrr N SMttTAXBAYEtmtm/Bom0M« HAW TAXBAYEt TAXBAYEl mm/m mm^ n vumwItAS H FEMAU M MAYXAYA m fSSAl tOGOfflCYl UMIY ETAL tOQOtIQi LOUSY 1A?0 M FESNDALE BO MAYZAYA rtl 5SSA1St tt-llY-ES AS tttl • IBAB FEBNDALE BO N ^SAC UNOtYSON BlOIISt L UNDSYIQH lAAi M FEUttALE BO MAYZAYA ttl BSSAl St n-117-ES AS MEZ • im FEBIOALE BO USEBAtt 7 MCCOUSYNEY ET At AEBAUI Y NCCQUBYNEY ItSS M FIBMDAIE BOAO OSQIBI m BSSfl St tS-117-ES AS ttZA •ItAS FEIISIAU SO M MEIMY N iKABS MEMIV N SKABB ItAS M FESISAtE BO MAYZAYA Itl SSStl YOYAL lATCN til itiit {-U7-ZS AS tttAtOOORICII lOURY ETAL GOODRICH IQURY 1070 U liRlElALE BO UAYZA1A Itl SSS9ISt t2-117-2S A5 too?G H RITZ t J n BITZ GOBOON H i JOYCE 11 RITZ loot U FEBNDAIE BO OSQNQ rtl S5391St Q2-117-ES AS tOES 0I09S FLRYOALE BO Ut t K roxOCA KATHEBIHE H FOX I09S M FEBIOALE BO UAYZATA Itl S5S9I #1465 II I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS **EFSESEHUn ABE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF YNFOBIt . ON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUKTY DEPABIhEMT OF PROPERTY TAXATIOHt TO THE BEST OF NY KNQUUOGE AND BELIEF f A a date r I yA ^ 1 % 1 I }•J LOT USEe>LO£*.lOTAL. A^<^EL9ATE. U/| Ot£.V^ , ->loe.W<^LkL De.iv/E.u/C^'fTt>TAl- j4Aepc:oUB2-LOT ^-ze.7S'-250‘ ZO lIE-“#1465^C^fis.o32,4^70 13, &70 KlEu; peal MCTTE-: 1. £>MADeP P41MA Oex^:sXEJy wJew MJomoM 1. lUPOCHPiTlCHsi OfcTrAlMEP reOM 6ueoE.y tavleu &!» aAgjt' L.aAfcPJEl. 7*21-«I KE^ Uo. ^ ■’SSL co";:::^ LA\4 e: MIUUETOWU.A 6iUM0US>- (iEPLPVJt w/ Pi^cr-i^-. £ rr,t.ou.i, ACeA Kl£W PRDPDS #1465 " ^ #1465 .1IIIIIIIIIMI J I lO ■n1t—. “ - •—_ ✓ 9 * ■- • ■ • - - — —* . . . ^f - - — - -n _, ^ «. . -✓i!r ,. ^ 5'toUC,. ^Ap fcekliC COL. FEIMCEL DETAIL -1 •« I . j 1 . t r * *f , f y*‘ * »*'» 1 • /• •»•*. •tm I ,‘t • •• * •«*••* \»•••. V ^i’ •• - . ’ r'i.l'* *•■•*. ••' m • •• •I ' ; •-.VC I # « ••- - .-• • *.. • r ^ • • --•**» 4, i, •, t*«-* •.»..• ► • •• • • ••‘f A t « ^i I I• \\ ' ': . I • ;•< <—Ac;v*"" * ^ ^HcWraV fciiS;^J JI5^151? ;r iB.wraj iMppK? »PWr WP^MW^rsrij^ [■nv nnT*kmkiil sPIS-‘•I -!3 W4^ is; ill t.-i “ • •• • t \. ••.?. - V --W n . • *: - : a nisi “Hi p- •* arv .« — t-*- -~ -•» h.- •• --------. • -.-r« • . I- ••, ...*• • * *■%. ^.^ .* • .» Ey\snu£^ e>LD6i. TOTAUWl DCT.VL. , dlOEWAUC Dejv/EvUAi’'TC>*TP^ \XP\^^COJes2^LOT ^-ZE- 7S‘ - 2SO* ZOwiE. UA\4E1 MIUUETOMV^A SMawAVTrei^ m FT*’**-* ^ *♦ I (3:)i iV/iA.W’^i^ovW.Ii7r i As>k^;e<^sniiveyy'2(~^y (0/ot^'2>7 /M»-ee f^rsoL #23-7^C*ucl ^ /truDR.A.i«tk stAceti Sk^TCH ^T5"'t-rb'-7^31. S'A! 33.3-V. 3^.S/<.I .I . Hi %T-3.*^,% ^.s;^ ^.r/. , t.iv*1 It !£>71?/oc^rt I ' ,cp\i-c oF= piu>f6Ci?t:» H c , <- - 72.S^* 7^02 ':^-I iI 'i^U.oV. # i/^^Y ; ; ‘ J / J /Aj'6/ei>^r8_To lAc^ f 7^ ^ ' » ’ * ' I ' i O.-js' t>ectM<e kA^lts Fto,^ Y«n ® oecK ee>«ii t ; . ' ' ' ! ' / I j______I * f^br^ ' )^/2^eoSe^ ,.jor /,), I?.C"C WA: L:: i- 7 £5 QA^-t-uftAT I ' /£>r gy Ai6S' I I ' fr?t^c\r iv‘T /c'.<^. *: 1 ! I !i ^____„..j 1 OkJ) 1 ' ': . i i 1 { \r • 1 1 HHNIi r’. f P: \ City of OROiVO ntSOlUTIOig Of THE CITY COUNCIL WO. -‘-^12________ A waoumcn grantinc : VARXANCSS TO mmiciPAL S0W1II6 cooc SCCnON 10.22, S0B0XVI810II 1 AMD SCCTXOn 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 fB) PILE 11104 'P WRCBBAS, Geral.! T. McCourtncy (hereinafter "the applicant") Is •!; • owner of the property locate»I .it 1055 West Fcrndale Road within the City of orono (hereinafter "City") and leoally described as followst .‘^ce Exhibit A, attached, (hereinafter "the property")! and WBBRrAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Eening Code Section 10.22, Subdivision I and Section 10.23, Subdivision 0 (3) to permit the construction of bathroom, dinette, and laundry roor additions to the existir.:| structure resulting in an increase of 2.1% cr 36*> i'.f. of hardcover within the 75*250 feet lakeshore setbacic area where only 25% or 3,?C>? r.f. if alletted and a side setback variance of 12*3” ff'et for the hathrocn addition that will encroach 1*9" further into the cninting rubr-tandard yard area than the existing structure. *ti nn''r.ota t KOV. TncftrPORB, BB XT ABSOLVED by the City Council of Orono, PXNDXRSS . •'.hi- apnlicat f'-'n war reviewed ns ~oning File fll04. .!. Th-' pr-. p* rty ’ n Jer.^ted in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore I’*-; vdr r:*. :.11 " ;:ina Oi.ntrict . T!v ‘ inning Cofimisr.ion reviewed this application on I' <7. ard recommended approval of the proposed variances i. .t!-*- ‘Xlcwino fxndinesi v 'r 'cf the area of this property is located within the 0 •' — ? .:?;rrhrro protected area. • • • c.r e • • r.ffuar'' foot of grassed lakeshore yard area '.tc treatronu area for the hardcover on the r. “'V' rity h.sr -creivod no aecntivc comments from the adjacent, I f%f •! Citv of ORON’O resolution of the city CO jncil NO. 2^7.3__________ 4 The City Council has considered this application bindings and recommendations of the Planning eJ CiJy staff, comments by the applicant and the e.feet of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the coi.munity. 5 The City Council finds that the conditions lllVeVty ?S.JVra*'’An’; ?hrv«i."ne.. -o«W as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty.* is Pf®*55 ' i-J substantial property right of the with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive of the City. CONCLOSIOMS, ORDER ARD CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted City Council herlby grants variances per M^-inicipal Code Section *0 ^2 Subdivision 1 and Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) p —.0.22, i ana c^rueture that recuires hardcover ^ •• I -J? Subdivision 1 and Section iu.4j, auuaivio*w.. « -- nstructicn of additions to the existing structure *'®*^‘*® d ride netback variancer., subject to the following conditions. 1. The drainage swale .-long the west side of the f^P®*^^^ be permanently cr temporarily altered as a result of the proposed construction. 2. Authorities grante * with this resolution run with the with the aoplicant. but are permissive only and .nust be ®*®/®*®” applicaticn for a building permit within one y®®^ Council approval, or these variances will expire (Septenbor 2B, 1989). cening cod-, sh-i 1 1 automatically terminate any authority granted herein, r.A:\ shnll be punishable as a nisdertennor. renolutic^ in the chain of title of the propcTwy. Page 2 of 4 P AM p.Tge 3 of ! 1 ^ sH 1 I 1.- fA / / 9 O \ \ \^K$ \ A\\ \ \ '*s-* ^,rr Ml \Q. K* • • $ \ r-s5L>\ \ v>^ vn: <^Aa •; / 9 •-C V- <:*•. Vv: X-\ '7 .si-' L .V-' *V f :• i'i’/. ■•l.L't’i' Z ►■*.•• • • • •“js ■4 I nr M .•«■ ■ r or Plnrnina Corntissicn Chnirp«3n Krilov Orono Plnnnina Commission Members City Adninistr<itor Pcrnhjrdson Promz T>ntc: Subject: Jeanne a. Mnbusth, P’jildina s, Toning Administrator Auaust 11 » 19H7 • 1184 Gerald 7. ^cCourtnoy, 1055 West Fcrnclale Rond Variance - r»jhljr f’rarira To* ing District • r,R-lA KTtincnt Ordinance - A. Section ! i v : s i on ! - excessive hardcover 75 to 250 setbneV area. Total Area ?2,670 s.f. 1) 0-75* setbac*^ ar*^a • 10,800 s.f. Hardcov<^r *• 0 s.f. 2)"5-2!'0* se-b'C’*- = 15,870 s.f. Alio *c<! bar ccv'-'r = 3,968 s.f. or 25t Existing ha: ’cover =* 5,b79 s.f. or 36^*i Proro^f^d hdrdcover - 5,958 s.f. or 37.5**7 Torn] har:’oov^r increase = 279 s.f or 1.5% Exi5tina Hardcover "‘finripa 1 structure •idowalk *r j VO mm 2T 3,«:• 4 s. •. 715 s.f. 410 S.f. ^00 r.f. • Proposed Hardcover Princip'nl structure ■ 4,518 s.f. Deck SidewnIk Drive 4.10 s.f. 410 s.f. 600 s.f. TCTAT.- •• (.-li r TOTAL » 5,958 s.f. f*. . **r>- 1‘.23, 5^ubdi vi.nicn 0 (B) - Side setback variance required bathroom adrliticr or north side of house. Porpij r^'l jO* rxistina ^ 15* rreponed “ 15* 50% .*of* of Exhibits r.y‘* 'bit % _ iS —7 pplica -P r '*'0^ r ** f'^ ♦• • .Plclt '*1 *>!’ i bj -P -*'♦.><■ f r h i b: t r - '*N h 1 * a •*•«• **Pi: ! • ’ • O' ^vi^w of AppliCfitioP - •'priirn-'* t'* *: •»ddit:o*-s te bat^reom, family reem, dinr»tto • 0,1 ■?“'.! la'I•**•*^* ’*00 “' ^ struc^ur^ jdded to PTtn^ical r**. r’m -V 2 rr.i ] y the rrero*=<"*d add ions • 1 b<* *’•*1 ,'*v*‘**' »n ‘'*xis*inc ^r^i •^•'S’.il^’inc an ir'^r^are of . • ..*0^ 27'*r• • • **ayor Grabek t Orono Council Members City Administrator Dernhardson ’•Tom: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Hate:October 8» 1987 f^ubject: #11«4 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road - Variance - Request to Amend Approval (Minor Plan Change Request) Request - Applicant has requested a revision of the previous approval. After completing their design plans for the attached bathroom addition on the street side of the house, they wish to expand the addition slightly, increasing 75-250* hardcover by about 90 s.f. or up to 8.048 s.f. (an increase of 6/10 of a percent over the 37.5% proposed, now requesting 38.1%). f 'll Also, since the bathroom will extend 4* further forward, being about « t from the street, it will be about ll'l" from the side lot line instead of the 15* previously approved. vacts - T5-250* Hardcover ride Setback (30* Hoquired) Resolution 12264 Before .Approved 5,679 s.f. (361) 5.958 s.f. (37.5%) 15* 15* Now Requested €.048 s.f. (38.11) 13*3" Mst of Bxhibits Exhibit A - Proposed Change Exhibit B - Council Minutes of 9/28/87 Exhibit C - Memo t Exhibits of 8/11/87 Exhibit 0 - Revised Resolution Reflecting Requested Changes rtaff Re ndation - Council has 4 options: 1. 2. 3. 4. Deny the request; Approve with revisions; Approve as requested; Refer to Planning Commisson for further review. Applicant or his representative intends to be at the meeting to '•plain the need for the revisions. ! ,1 '^1 CnCNO COUNCIL tBBTIMG HELD JAMOAXy 12, 197S The CoMBisslen raeonaended to tho Council approval of the fill and drainage plan with the following stipulationat That the plan allow only tha nomal fill and grading required for tha houae plan previoualy presented to tha City. Only natural fill aatariala be allowed in tha house eonstmetion. That tha City Engineer approve the plan. That the retaini^ wall be taken out of the plan and the area left in its natural atate. 1. 2. 3. 4. Page S VMIXANCl loss !tast Paradale Hoad (Continued) . • .c vi- ymm .f.- .»•* < • X "T ■ - t •> , —f A letter from Engineer lick Sathre# representing the City's engineering OapartSMnt« stated thati In accordance with your latter of January €» r ^ hmwm kiaiIa An InoMC^ion of tho subioct *1 have made an on-site inspection of the subject property and have the following eensMnts and reconeiandationa • Tha plan aa subaULtted* entitled Drainage Plan# Proposal A# calls for tha grading of a drainage . ditch on the aoutherly edge of Pemdale Read to tha seat. Thia ditch# if cenatructed# would 1 feel# result in the less of several large trees easterly of the proposed house location in the right-of-way of Pemdale Road. A ditch# if conatrueted# would naceasitate tha installation of two cttlvertsi one each under the existing driveway and the proposed driveway. Thaae consequancea of conatructing tha ditch as proposed# lead sm to baliava that this is not the proper solution to this drainage problem• ». ••• .> M h- ■ -.•*» ? K ’ •‘r ; • /.• ••. i - • .«• r- - ^ I would reeessMnd that tha owner be dirseted to retain the low area along Pamdala Road and his north«pasterly property line in ita natural state and to conatruct a flat drainage swale between the two elm trees (to the west of the proposed house) and tha westerly property line. This ditch should have a bottom elevation of 933«. Under this proposal# the minimal amount of water normally entering this drainage «ray trould be percolated into the soil# thereby creating no direct run-off to tha lake. In the event of •1 large rainfall# however# the swale would allow the water which is backed up# to overflow into the lake. If these roeoaBwndations are followed# the low area will function very much aa it does preaently# in that the overflow to the lake at present# occurs when the water reaches 933 elevation. This occurs after the pocketing of water to a depth of roughly S inches. Since the water would not be retained to a lavel higher than is presently the ease# the adjoining property owner to the west should have no cause for alarm.* ■Wfc. t alarm.” ■ x;... U, f . . , ■ ‘I ‘ * *• '• ‘ * ' • s oRONo cotr.icit MWTmG imo movbosk U, Paurus movwJ, Wel«h •**fi.i***#I?I***cor Robert rroet, U25 Chlpp^ street and aide ijfn?)-the Planning Coaiidsalon. Ay«« Nays (0). Paurus aoeed, »lalsh seconded, ^•^J*** SSS**far for Roger 8«*anotroii, 1510 •©*“»• I?^2K«*!iliiilnc a wetlands sarlance, ^ TlmUng co«isslon. Motion, Ayos (5) - Hoy* (0> • Pago i *.? .VMOMICt , V •4cas Chippwmv\ * ,e • • •«•V V • ■./ • 1%^ *» • y * • 15i?SSn»« Point iood ♦P X VMIZMO loss .MMt • - * ■ -i . ;., *'Tr V- CBRB LRHD OO 'U *. - • . ' -.• •■ -. •J T i. •: ^ i- e * tf A I jsfSL's^krJ!S5*ss%^.*£:£^2« i^iSTiyS: ")^“(o»! .; Pauma noved, Welsh seconded, that ^X**?^*\ ^ 22M^ttadywo2*lloadforJaa»s HeCleary, 2259 Shadyvoo^ad, for r r .Shaayw^ ™ ^ a conditional use pexnit, be jjj* (o%Planning Coaiiisoion. Notion, Ayes (5) - Maya (0) • Cheyenne Land Coevany - * zoning Adelniatrator, reele^ staff reports that had preeioualy been submitted to the City Connell and Planning Cowilasion concerning this application for reaoning. Ha stated that he had linapectad t^ question on four separate occasions and that on one of those occasions he was in a car accident while ttteepttog to tolve from Highway 012 onto Orono Orchard Roy. noted that three cars wore waiting in him ft lft£k hftiid kun onko Oirono Occliftrd Road and several cars were «ttyptlng to come from Orono Orchard Road onto Hlgyay #12. toIs area haa always been known as bel^ fl!iIfJSl*feh! nature and such a development would incresM wa traffic flow measurably at this * Mayor Searles noted that thU tiSilbeen dangerous for pedestrians and ^hi^^ traffic. Muhich noted that another dangy^s^ traffic point was the overpass on Oroy O^aw Road. At the overpass, only ®"* ®** travel and on several occaslms he Hm »t other cars there and has had to pull over to allow them to pass under the bridge. Muhich stated that he spent half the through the project on one occasion and noty that the projMt is very hilly in thftTft ftTft numftrouft mftrfthlftiidft ftnd throughout the property. Me recent flood plain n«p shows ®f_2*nr# XU khft flood plftln ftft dokoniiiiod by tho Fodorftl poifomniftiita ' c”.. 'I vt -%■- K,' • *1 • ,f» ■ *i . . #r*. *.*• • .. .> • I • .V* (e^tinttsd)iS*--'?’*' V' ■ .v:- “i f \ / 9 \ A \ \ \\\1' " 1^:. s:^ \ % ■» ''S’* ^ *-sSL> O' \ Cit* 'v ^ <:t "5* S CT L -t / •c w '9- 4m H2K .1 »tiiitniim«namrtitmriJi \ ! • m » ‘ • •, I":V. . ’*4} . i: •rv^ !•*it•i'!- . y •1- >• \ % iu-y-sj.' ■vI'V iJiili. -. ■'. t • ^ ^ - -* «*• iMT-r- »• *•■ C *1 --------------- S| A ^p ‘ ^ 9 .-•••% UI.J J^ i % f t h^;^£ifiSis' *■. il^ :.v'i* * ■ ;a: ' • • •• 9;S -‘-npt.. •i v\ L r ' . Jr * a ^/3^ -/A/s-^ryjfy LOCvrrcN CP PICPOSAL (or pcopaxty) TVidreg a jd v'ry i:/^ /t Lejal DMrriptiW Tract B - ULS Wo« 1372 iffser APEU cane Odd K qv IcJc R dm §926-8339 6101 Rallfax Av«iia« South CHCR Odd Rovlck Phtm • 926-8339 6101 Halifax Avaiwa South U-lA-2 Acre OMYacslaa* 34.201, 34.202, 34.352________ OOnditiOMll Q hi > rm /2-Jr^Z> Sapeify i^aaix—** 2 acre and let uldth_200^_and_atraat_aatbadt_30^_aa< lakaahere aatback 73* and hardcover lake aetback 01 to 73', 231 to 230* and 30X to 300*. raglnln to —of variance raquaatad for atraat aatbai , lot area, lot width at atraat. actual 37*j atraat aetback reqd. 3U', actual J3'| lot width at atraat raqd. 200', actual 130.60*1 cannot meat hardcover lake setback. 'laodahipa to n»»^TtY The let la unbulldable under praaaiy j^tnt^rdtnanca^ SM8T FOR OMnBB M*U ff eifit 1. Application cenplatad 3.nsy (Sketch in propoael) 4. ALatractor'e CirtifieatB of Fkepaety Onara within 31 5. $30.00 IWa -'ata '//3^s SiTiatun *# a :-1 «al.a. . V . •«.. a:^ ». • I• • fy» V •< kC«5 ^;i,»*!c;s: <t \ X • <* rC . .* •' ' n' ■ ■■ i\ • k 1. • * \• • t 1 XX r< ■,: * ITf Y i - *"> •• ^■;4' '|i . • ■ ' ,; • ;i3 n • V ■ ‘‘x ^ ^ I . • * / ^ ■ -tv I I ( •^; *• jm ‘' *. , vM • ..• • •-•» il i . II \ .»r». > ll „ .V..[\.•. ^r, 9> \• • ^ ' X ;. \* . M« #\ • . 1'. i ,.,^... •\N:<''.;.V\ ; • ; •:‘f* ».,•« <• ^ *'v I \* \ -m f Ik ‘/tr ^ \l V' • •• • . f .. ' \ " »i9 ' » V I *• ■ V;--'A \\: •“*k ‘•.•♦>. .\V' V.' .■' ■■V •* *' *,*•>;•. ■ r7 • ^. , •« . '*• . ^ 4 . • . •..' . . ,.v •, • ^ ’. k' 4.U<v.'V Y> •*,'SWM V m • «i ^ t • ! ;- • i ' 1. sehidiilid OnaeU iiSSag 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 Mw^ U «a 4U1 iwiiirtim ***^*"*ir) Planing ooHunan NMa 1st «d 2gi (BctoUiv *^1— CT«j«<w^ withoit Pufelie Buiing * aHP**id*«tsly Ifcfrlal H IT fillli *, 1. Goinell zatesal 2. 3. 10* 1975 17* 19^ 4 . Ooincll Ti 2* 1975 il Jletlcn •* 1975 ;ii4inrs op a regular meeting held august ar, 197S Page 2 Uutler aovad, Walsh seconded, to grant t le variance to Odd Rovick, 104S West remdale Road, subject to the applicant designing a septic system that Is acceptable the Villaae Eneiiieer: that the final VARIANCE 4 PINAL PLAT 104S ffeat Penidale Road to the Village Engineer; that the fine nlat of Mr. .'feCaffrey be filed;aad that variance to the current building moratorium be granted for Mr. Odd Revick. The Council feels that a variance of ISO* from the road setback requirement should bo grantod duesetback requirement should do grantou aue to the odd shape of the lot. that a SO* lake setback must be maintained, and because of the limited amount of traffic on Penidale Road. Motion, Ayes (S) - Nays (0). m-* Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to approve- NorthtiM division of John Cross,. 26SS Shore Drive, with the understanding that this property, idiich has less than 140* of lakesnore on tho subdivided lot, is a negative factor for subdivisions i to be considered on the balance of the property. No further subdivisions will bo allowod for the romalnder of the property on the lakesiiore area. Mr. Cross was asked to consult with Itr. Narstou about creating an easement that could be used for a future east-west road through the property. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). . t- uV-lP»vL-/m ^DIVISION " * • ■ ♦ * V*lOH •> iiutler moved, Welsh seconded, to accept the changes as shown on the plat of Olcon, 242S North Shore Drive, subject to tho applicant paying tho prescribed park fee, nnd that tne application is still subject to all conditions of the initial notion made by the Council. r4otion. Ayes (3) • Nays (0). Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to adopt Resolution fS04, A Resolution Approving The Vacstion Of Park Avenue And Adams Street. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). v/elsh moved, Butler seconded, to instruct Mr. ledstron that his bam must be removed within SO days of today* s date, flotion. Ayes (3) - Nays (0) ./elsh moved, Butler seconded, that the Village of Orono accept the Antoinelept tne Antoine prop erty as a Village para and that the Villa K,,.ay the last half of tho 1973 tames and that the park be named after Mrs. Antoine. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). - - 24BS North Shorn Drivo •t 4.: V •• • - r, 'r-A- ; I *■ .r ...» * <e.4 ' ■ .V4>. OICON 2423 North Shorn Drivo■ -1 . - : • *4. . • • • ' Sim • h RESOLUTION 9304 :• > " Vaeato Park Avtnuo 4 > .V . Adau Street REMOVAL OP BARN V- . f * C ^*-1 e ANTOINE PARK . i * 0 •I 9^ • • • • -w 9 M TO: noH: GATB: nuiCTt nunlag CoMiMloB Hmibafi Onur Haraton, Zoalat Ailalalstnitor a, 1973 Mtback ud v«ri««e« froa so* mmontti OM 9 Mm UtiMk ;rucmm. IMS M., M«us. ims - «i *********** *****•• J* j w rMwttM ■"■'i'/'"' ■ ’* I: JSSSS SBis*j •j.2‘^2:•> « • ^i^*U.-:J m**L>5 S*.J2*a2 •^AriiSS5SS!J^-1 MSkMto mm4 b.*y*a4TL‘2:i ^ Jjjs :iSi2sr'"•••« A SO* satWck «PAB fth. - ,*• ■ w .«« cm-mM .„„„x .* M«. > ■n?kM<v r!“ f • > ,A- . ;. i ^ \K • • .S^-r •' %>' •• • , r : « iF ERRY ENKUS LTD 474*7556 Ois/om IbiilJcr J.5.31 SUplewoikl ( lu/r • l:\tilsun. MN >5.331 Kovambdr ?0, 1939 Jean Mabusth City of Crono P.O* Box 66 Crystal flay, Ito.55323 REi Zoning Fll® #1465 aid T. McCourtney 1055 Femdale Road Wast Waytata, Mn. 55391 Hear Jean, I would like to roquost • yarianeo to Ineraasa hardcover In the 75-250* tone. Duo to the also and shape of the property at 1055 Forndalo Pd, West the present toning ordinance severely limit the allowable hardcover. In order to provide adequate driveway, sidewalks and patios, I am req\Mstlng additional hardcover up to 7t?**5 s,f. In tot-al for this property. The driveway plan as ^tovn will provide for safer off-street parking and turn around. The existing deck which has been removed for construction access was considered by myself and Mr, Cradlt to be replaceable without variance* We find however, that a variance is reqxilred and would like to also request a variance for the new deek/terraee as shown on plan E-1, l int" Honu \ of Quality ami Valin’ Vos Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Froai Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s* Zoning Administrator Hates Subjects Hovonber 17» 1989 #1481 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road - After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District ~ LR-IA* Single family lakeshore residential« 2-acre« sewered Application - After-the-fact conditional use permit and variance for land alterations within 75' of the lakeshore. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Proposed Grading Plan Elevation View, Lake Side of House Staff's Site Inspection Notes 10/11/89 Pertisiont Facts - 1. With the original building permit for the remodeling work at 1055 West Ferndale Road, no grading plan was submitted and no indication was ever given to staff that work in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone or on any yard areas for that matter, would be taking place. 2.During the remodeling, applicant revised the southwest deck scheme into a terraced area with full concrete foundations. This resulted in some excavation in the 75-250' zone with stockpiling in the 0-75' zone. Inspector Lyle Oman notes that this was allowed on a temporary basis, and that Mr. Wenkus kept silt fence *t the shoreline during the storage period. 3.In September and October 1989, applicant had large boulder rip rapping installed at the shoreline. Because of the low water levels, materials had to be trucked in from the land rather than barged in. This caused some disruption of the 0-75' yard area which applicant was advised to restore immediately. Also, at the time work was being done on the boulder wall, the applicant replaced a culvert that led from the pre existing swale along the west lot line through the old rip rap. In doing so, the applicant lowered the rip rap culvert in order to eliminate puddling in the 0-75' zone, which had resulted from silting of the old drainpipe (also due to raising of the grade at the shoreline from ice pressure over the years). Zoning File #1481 November 17» 1969 Page 2 of 3 4.In conjunction with lowering that culvert, applicant also regraded the swale in the 0-75' zone to accommodate drainage away from the walk-out door which was constructed to the basement area. This walk-out door was approved by the building inspector on the ronodeling plan, but no indication of site grading to accommodate that door was submitted. Staff had no Indication that the applicant intended to lower the grade between the door and the shoreline. A door well could easily have been constructed to accommodate that doorway without the need for grading in the 0-75' zone. 5.The applicant notes that as part of the original subdivision to create this lot, a swale along the west lot line was required and had been installed in 1975. The grade at the wall in the location of the basement doorway previously was approximately 3* higher and the swale just continued along the west side of the house from the front yard out to the lake. It is staff's opinion that the reduction in grade in the 0- 75* within 20' of the shoreline is necessary for drainage maintenance. Any grading work from 20* to the house doorway (about 100* back from the shoreline) was not necessary except to provide gravity drainage away from the basement door. Discassion - Except for the area of the swale, the lakeshore yard has been restored back to original grades, i.e. the temporary storage fill has been removed and the ruts created by the trucks carrying rip rap boulders, have been refilled and top-dressed. The questions posed to the Planning Commission are two-fold: A) Should a conditional use permit be granted after-the- fact for grading work within 20' of the shoreline to maintain the culvert through the rip rap and the swale, which were required as part of the 1975 subdivision? B) Should the additional depth of swale be allowed to accommodate the basement doorway, or should that area be restored to pre-existing grades and some sort of well/step system be constructed for the doorway, totally in the 75- 250' zone? The grade at the basement doorway has been dropped approximately 3*. In the 0-75' zone, the lowering of the grade at the bottom of the swale ranges from just a few inches to approximately 12 Inches to 18 inches at the 75* setback line. Zoning Pile #1481 November 17r 1989 Page 3 of 3 Also note that the "pre-existing contours” shown on the proposed site plan, were taken after restoration grading occured. It is staff's impression and the concurrence of the neighboring property owner, Henry Sharp, that lakeshore grades except at the vest end of the house, are very near the pre-existing situation. Unfortunately, no grading plan with pre-existing contours (prior to the remodeling) is on file. Obviously, applicant should have submitted a grading plan for the proposed changes to accommodate the basement doorway, and Orono's building permit application requirements clearly state that any changes in grade must be accompanied by a grading plan. “'^her point to nota regarding 0-75' grading is that the propoi. ows grade changes of approximately 0-6” between the west y ^ f the house and the lake, and then creates a more gentle slope adjacent to the southwest terrace area. If the grading to accommodate the basement door is not allowed, the extent of retaining walls and grading near the southwest terraced area would be slightly revised. Just as a matter of record, the applicant has paid the required $400.00 after-the-fact land alteration conditional use permit application fee rather than the standard $200.00 fee. Staff BecosaMiidatloo - Staff recommends approval of the grade changes within 20* of the shoreline to accommodate the drainpipe through the rip rap. This maintenance work would appear to be necessary to continue the drainage system that was put in place with this subdivision in 1975. Regarding the lowering of the swale in order to accommodate the basement access door, staff would note that the changes in grade do not significantly change the drainage pattern nor do they have any significant impact on quantity or quality of run off. In the 0-75' zone, the swale is lowered approximately 6-12" from its pre-existing status. The more pertinent question is one of policy. The City has in recent history denied cutting of lakeshore bank or grading in the 0-75' zone merely to accommodate a walk-out situation. There are a number of precedent cases within the last few years which have been based on the concept that changes in the grade oT the lakeshore 0-75' zone are detrimental from the standpoint of visual impact as viewed from the lake, as well as changing the character of the lakeshore. In the McCourtney situation. Planning Commission should determine whether the impact on the lakeshore yard is significant or whether this situation is unique due to the pre-existing swale and the relatively minor changes in grade proposed in the 0-75' zone. ; i tt I k L -y ' I--#:AL LAHO OSS APPLI •M- 1=4F iCITT OF OROVO - PBOFBSTT LOCATION Site Address (E. ^ • Property Identification Number (P.I.O.) 'i \\ rrrv nr roiiin c a * I t-i a ■ tn‘»^I k < a / A #A « « * jC ^ ‘ ^ w r • I Wi ♦ j • <w'v'V'v\'Y rriY w« t aw-tM •• >* i ♦ •v V • v;V ft n 11 f • T• vv A'£:ripr-7.44AV\ >i?y Please check one ~ Property abstract or torrens ^< ct-ei.-.'. r-w« c,*.f ri^;'«a«.'W‘Ww*v wwa »'va f • II /’• • /v (for Conditional Use Applications only) ? ' V • /va V/ r / w Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Phone (home) _Phone (work) City vC- Zip SK^3-/ APPLZCAHT Name (S>£4^y L}C/t/, Ad^^ress_____ OffHER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) ^— !S-75c> Neune '*"7^Phone _ _ _ _ Address City zlpSV^Y- Date Property Acquired _ (fflonth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels wf land PEES - CONDITIONAL DSS PERMITS - Renewal Pee - 1/2 Current Fee //vj After-the-Fact Fee $100.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) ✓ 0200?^f) /Vc^o/O Institutional (churchy school# etc.) ' ^ Land Alteration + j Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading amd filling r 101 cu. yd. or more Grading# seawall# retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRO/PID - see fee schedule TTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 $250.00 '' " $150.00 $ 50.00 ' $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals Other - see fee schedule • . IPBESnT OSB Of PBOPERTT Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify)_ 0 Desc^be reques^in detail: -Ar/^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - KBQOmBD SOBMXTTILS 2I c«tif ied ^?oV^rty°”owne^^^ List of owners within 350* (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government 3. »i**d envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. ** i-nri5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). e! As^an^addendiun to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ___________ The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. rememl^^ that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Certification by Zoning Department that Land Dse Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature ___________________ ______________________________»' The^a^licant hereby agrees to provide all information requested by the Zoning Adminis^.ator, agrees to pay all ThS*SSne?^T^y acJcnowledges and agrees to this authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes investigation and veri^c^ion of this request. Owner's signature _______________jlt—~ Applicant must have alfl'Vubmittals into ^e City offices 25 J*.®^°5® J[J® PlLming Commission Meeting. Planning Commission ”®®^i®9a are third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all schedu^iea review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place,and advise the Building * Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ......1 -..........— .... . 1 I as. V • Aim .cor4 »)«»' MINNE TONKA WNS BAY) 7.R.23 ■UN u:nMkrm itiTJUMYOImm/3i tt-117-ti %i mt •liTt rtiNIAlE ■■ N iOODilOl LOUtY fTALmmn m »m■ t m tt-iiT-ti %i iMiNNMIY nN fwmmtdM m lU^YIAU Ml iSlYlYMOHYOIIt tl MSI•Itti 7IMMALI to N ■ i C UMMIMN ■ICWMM L UlMtYlON IMYtAYA Ml fSlfI It tC-ll7-tl tl lilt •itti rwNMAU m m NCMIY N IKMM A YAMFtYia IttS M riMMAii ■■ MAYIAYA Ml itltl ! ^ \ \ NOtSnH COUHTY PNOtOITY tHFORHATIOHmraiTY omuis listSt tt-117-tl AS fits • ItTt rfMMAU it NNCIilY N MCAtr iKMiY N mum ItAS N rfltilAli M MAVZATA Ml SSSflSt tt-117-tS AS tttS60QM1CN LCMtY rTAL tOOMICN LOMPY ItTt N rtaiMALE ■■ HAYZAYA m »S9ISt tt-117-tS AS ttZt tltSS MMMAU to N iftAlt Y NCCOMlYMiY ET At titAlt T NCCtUiYNEY ItSS N EEMMALI MUM mam m sssti K TVriL MTCH Ml Nllf RCraiT NO. PI^SSMI PAM 1M M-ltr-M A1 MMfICH lOWY CTAL SOQMICH LONRY 1070 H rERWALI RO MAYZATA 104 &S101M 02-117-<S AS 0M76 N RITZ 0 J N RITZ COROON H 0 JOYCf H RITZ lOM U FCRNDALC RO ORONO Itl S5S01M 0Z-ll7-tS AS 002S 0I09S FCRHBAU RO H 0 0 K FOXOCA KAYHERINC N POX 109S M FCRIttAlC RO HAYZAYA Itl sssti #1465 I I CERTIPY 1NAT TWI FACTO REFRESmiXD ARE AH ACCURATE AW TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORnATION AS IT APPEARS TYilS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE NEMIEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF NY KNOULEOCC AW BELIEF., y\ ^ DATE f ^ y\ • /• pAp.. \h\LiY'^ K •• • . /. > r- ■« . • • —» . . • "Tui.. ; ,<* . #• f ^j / // .1- -V V*'.. ■ •, • /= I « ' 7'\t / vt' ^• ' V T . t • 4- ^. *; • ^ • » % fey » . fi'* .. • > v t • •» •/ * *• : it.•• ;.r7- • t ^ . • t • f '• •; • V ' »# !• * :: *? f * j i 'j i’, ■ • ' \l *.•.■. • *1 ■ < • •* • (aj- (CfeAMXvAte /mFt /<9-//-£5. . /f/M-... (2) ^If-ej^li^ fl?:.Si^r-*W^_fy^rW„/V7eSj/l/^ A^r,t^jii^f^^iNCy T?^ _r^^-e></xr7AiG_. Ws: p'c&f^y , V V - i^-Aftfe&eb»T:.cM6/ad /Aj c-^r TP /S»g>//u^ e^^eiM.ei^T’ _*D/iT:tir-^-i2. C4?=: /r^<U-M '--...- ................................... «" * TW^Pe ig ** Cl^T TVrgg«^C»*^ eA^J<_J^TZ. g^fe^ST £■ .7Z3_Tltt^ ^t*c»/g4yV/»-*g ^ ^U.^ >S ^ <^^•"2.* aUt^ (mJL« T)g.»ACK tiBiVF^/c I • jg.g' /^yATT Lte^CmTU O F THl^ H lATTLer no iLeMArfKi/M c^ A<fcAOl»^ iF^r^faihyA^nr^ IPd€'-ti)it iTlAJC!^ . ^IUL. «s-rp/?-4^g /^/^e*3 //V/ ^ jSo>^»e-cfers> iwft !i ll Coyg^t?^ gp (4o^^ S' (S^OcS^ ^ Suo<o>c.g « f p I ^4 ------c>F^ E>4 ^^.Le fA^tC^JL^ _e?^fZT^ yj^ O^T 2lOtr J.*ITZSZ. /^f^v&u TZ> rfc*^ _7^_/i/6.ydiw^^^ £'yjr i. fe' ; TS tfvsJ TIL ^ ^CVfDer A/^i ^ ^4^-* T >/4r £ --lA/j :: u*^4rL (^ 6 '' •.' 3 /A/ -- TH J. “Tt? "^Ctrt*JACrt^ _ i«.*.i}; kron**' /!^.-fc>r.^ C>Oc?/^ f^-n,'-f /fJzrAtti-^:^ —rTH^— ^^^_^^3vCi.//vj<s f*^/+A/ uj A"^ <*'^1^7 .icyLurH- ___________________________ .-.fil^L?^ed^ , L^c>Cif.. /C c c-^A,y:^y yV 7/y©u><H7CAj O^.J)'7.fl___ *Miru fV^ _______ fL^6>xA LA'netK.r ^ _ ____________ ^60 ge/ei Ot^ T^»g /^ 7?^ L -------- **«. •• -/................................................................ _/A^ P ^POO^ ^CfT’ -t f Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission M«nbers City Administrator Bernhardson Proas Oates Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Hovesd>er 14» 1989 Subjects #1470 Daniel Parten, 4300 Bayside Road > Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Rearing Applieatioa - 3>lot Plat List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Memo from Applicants Large Size Proposed Plat Drawings Planning Commission Action Notice 10/20/89 Memo & Exhibits of 10/10/89 Discussion - The applicants have met with staff and have attempted to address Planning Commission's concerns with their revised proposalr a 3-lot plat. This proposal results in three lots of 4.3f 4.4» and 6.0 acres respectively. They would bo served by a 50* private driveway outlot that connects to the Reiersgord property to the east and to the Asao property on the northwest. Each lot would meet the lot width standard as measured at the 50' setback from the road outlot. Lots 2 and 3 would require a lot area variance. The applicants request that they not be requirea to pave any portion of the road/driveway within the outlot. They propose to construct an 18* wide gravel driveway to the turn-around area (see Sheet 2 of the large scale site plan) and a 14' wide gravel driveway to Lots 2 and 3. Alternatives - Please review the applicants' memo. They have considered two alternatives to the proposal. Their Exhibit A indicates a two lot plat excluding the northernmost parcel from the subdivision^ wherein each lot would contain 5 acres# being served by a 50' private driveway outlot. Under this scheme# they would not be required to pave# and this would be considered as merely a shared driveway. Such a proposal does not resolve any of the concerns with surrounding properties and would likely make it harder in the future for those access problems to be resolved either by the City or by the affected property.owners. Zoning File *1470» November 14, 1989* Page 2 of 3 The second alternative is shown on applicant's Exhibit B as a PRD layout. The proposal appears somewhat contrived in order to place the alternate drainfield site for Lot 1, within Lot 1. Applicants feel that the PRD concept is not necessarily appropriate since the shared nature of the open space would tend to negate the privacy aspects of the low density development. Applicants further are concerned about the marketability of the PRD as it applies to this specific property. Certainly applicants are correct in that the property does not lend itself to clustering, as was the case in the Luce Line Ridge PRD development just to the west. However, with 3 lots on over 17 acres, as a PRD no lot area variance is necessary since the road outlot can be credited for meeting the density requirement. Issues - 1.Does the Planning Commission feel comfortable via the proposed standard plat in granting the necessary lot area variances for Lots 2 and 3, to be less than 5.0 acres in the 5 acre zone? If so, the proposed plat would seem to address the general issues outlined by the Planning Commission previously. If not. Planning Commission should consider the PRD alternative, in which the lot area request is no longer a variance. 2.Is the applicants' prcoosal for an 18' wide gravel road to the cul-de-sac, with a?ji extended 14' gravel driveway to Lots 2 and 3, acceptable tie Planning Commission? If not, what additional standards would Planning Commission recommend? If Planning Commission wishes to recommend approval for lot area variances for the standard proposed three lot plat, there are number of unique findings that might be made that would set this application apart from other future applications requesting lot area variances in the 5 acre zone: 1. In order to provide future access to neighboring land locked parcels, the City is requiring an unusually lengthy outlot road that subtracts from the overall acreage. 2. Due to the extremely hilly topography and "stretched out" nature of the parcels encompassing the property, the length of roadway to serve only three parcels is necessarily of an excessive length. 3. The overall density for the three proposed lots is 5.6 acres per residence, meeting the intent of the 5 acre minimum lot size standard of the RR-IA sonin. district. 1^. L_ Zoning Pile #1470 Hovenber 14» 1989 Page 3 of 3 If Planning Commission feels that these and other appropriate findings provide a substantial justification to grant the lot area variances requestedr such that the precedent-setting aspect would be minimised, then a recommendation for approval of the proposed plat would be appropriate. On the other hand, if Planning Commission feels that granting the lot area variance here will ultimately lead to pressure for lot area variances on less unique properties in the 5 acre zone, then the PRD concept with three distinct building pads and coeanonly owned open space, could be considered. Staff would also note that if a recommendation for approval be forthcoming, the plat would be subject to the standard drainage and utility easementSp a drainage easement over the major drainage ravine, park fees, private road easements and covenants, etc. iiiiSrhrtMi I • TO: Orono Planning Commission FROM: Dan and Ruth Parten RE: Bayside Woods Subdivision I. Proposal - Three Lot Subdivision We propose a 3 lot subdivision with road outlot, including an 18 foot vide gravel driveway to the turnaround, and a 14 foot wide gravel driveway to Lots 2 and 3. Lot 1 is arranged to incorporate an alternate septic site as shown. Variance Request tl - Lot Area Proposed Lots 2 and 3 are 4.3 and 4.4 acres respectively. Lot 1 is 6.0 acres and the proposed road outlot is 2.3 acres. The overall density of this project is 5.6 acres per residence. The unique terrain of the property together with the creation of a 50 foot wide road outlot of 2.3 acres creates a hardship that we feel justifies the granting of a variance. Variance Request #2 - Paving We recognize that at some future date the driveway Outlot could access up to six properties and provide access to three landlocked parcels. The additional cost of bituminous paving for the 1,250 foot long driveway to the turnaround is approximately $23,000. We feel that if paving is a requirement, those costs should be shared by all benefiting parties. Therefore a variance is being requested to waive, for the present time, paving of the driveway. II. Alternate #1 - Two Lot Subdivision If a variance for paving is out of the question we propose a two lot subdivision, shown as "Exhibit A". The additional expense of paving the driveway and turnaround make a three lot plan economically impractical. This plan produces two 5 acre plus parcels with no variances required. u Page 2 - Bayside Woods Subdivision III. Alternate #2 - PRD Exhibit B is an attempt to create a PRD as requested by the Planning Commission. The intent of a PRD (as explained by staff) is to cluster home sites in one area of development and leave open space for the enjoyment of the residents, maintaining the overall density of the project at 5 acres or more per residence. The topographic features of the property, potential septic sites, and the natural building sites make clustering of homes unfeasible. The use of open space around building sites when the sites are separated as these are, would infringe on the privacy of the residences and therefore make the lots less marketable. ! EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT A ZOHIBC FILE HO.1470 CITT OP OBOHO P.O. Box €6 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 HOnCB OP PLAHHIHG COMMISSIOH ACTIOH Date of Hotlca: 10/20/89 TOt Daniel Parten 1015 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES TO: TXPB OP APPLICATIOHx Subdivision DATE OP !TIH6:10/16/89 Vote: 7 For 0 Against Hanning Cosnd.ssioa tho following Tabled for reasons noted below. ■OTBS « SPECIAL CONDITIONS - Applicant to submit revised proposal(s) for review. General comnents by the Planning Commission: 1. Septic alternate site for Lot 1 (existing house) must be within Lot 1 if a standard plat is proposed. Some flexibility may be possible if a PRD is proposed. 2. Whether a standard plat or PRD is proposed. Planning Commission might consider granting lot area variances, given the overall 3 residence/17 acres density. 3. Planning Commission would prefer that access corridors be provided to the Relersgord, Asao, and Deters properties, given the access concerns with those properties. 4. 50' outlet corridors would be appropriate throughout the subdivision; paved width of actual road/driveway to be standard 24' if all houses are served, perhaps some flexibility on paving if less houses are served. 5. Applicant advised to propose both a PRD and a standard plat for consideration. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the November 20, 1989 meeting is November 10, 1989. In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information within 120 days or the City will consider the application as fonaally withdraim. If you desir/. * tified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. > ,«s • • # /. •p*Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Date: Michael P. Gaffron* Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator October 10, 1989 11470 Daniel Parten, 4300 Bayside Road Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District ** RR-IA, 5 acre, unsewered Application - 3-lot Class III subdivision to create two new 5 acre building lots in addition to existing residence. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Preliminary Plat Drawings Exhibit E - Letter from Neighboring Property Owner White Exhibit F - Sketches by Staff Including: 1. Neighboring Property Ownership 2. Acreage Layout 3. Scale Concept Plan Showing Building Sites 4. Existing & Proposed Driveway System 5. Staff Conceptual Sketch A 6. Staff Conceptual Sketch B 7. Staff Conceptual Sketch C s. Exhibit G - Subdivision Code Section 11.10, Subdivision 21 Pertinent Facts - 1. Proposed lot areas are as follows: Proposed Lot 1 « 5.2 acres (existing house) Proposed Lot 2 ■ 5.0 acres Proposed Lot 3 >■ 5.0 acres Outlot A ■ 1.87 acres Total Acreage « 17.06 acres (per survey - does this figure include 33* of right-of-way for Watertotm Road?) 2. Proposed Lot 1 would not abut a private or public outlet road, but is proposed to be served by an easement driveway, which conflicts with Section 11.10, Subdivision 21 (c). Lot 1 contains the existing house and the existing primary drainfleld. The site evaluation report on file indicates there are no suitable alternate drainfleld sites within proposed Lot 1 and the only apparent alternate site is within Outlot A. The southerly 60* of Lot 1 contains an existing private "road" easement in favor of the Reiersgord property to the east. Applicant has not excluded this existing road easement from his calculation of lot area as required by the subdivision code. Zoning Pile #1470 October 10, 1989 Page 2 of 5 3. 4. '■ 5. 6. 7. Proposed Lot 2 is a "flag* lot which would have 60* of frontage on Bayside Road per the proposal. The flag portion of Lot 2 also is covered by the 60* existing road easement, which again was not excluded from the area calculation by the applicant's surveyor. Primary and alternate drainfield sites for Lot 2 would be located along the northerly lot line of Lot 2. Lot 3 abuts the Luce Line Trail and was the subject of a prior variance application which was never completed. This subdivision proposal increases the area of that parcel to 5.0 acres (including the proposed road easement). One of the issues with that prior variance request was access across the Luce Line Trail, which the applicant could not obtain. The current proposal leaves Lot 3 with no frontage on a public or private outlet road, but gives it about 158* of frontage on a proposed 30' private road easement. Outlot A was proposed for possible sale to the abutting property o«mer at 4360 Bayside Road. However, since septic testing indicates the only alternate site available for Lot 1 would be within the area of Outlot A this poses a problem. The proposal does not strictly meet the requirements of the septic code, which requires that drainfield sites be within the building lot which they serve. The proposed dividing line between Lots 1 and 2 generally follows a deep ravine. The proposed 30* easement road was located to fit the existing topography. The property contains steep slopes which significantly limit the potential roadway locations. A number of variances would be required in order to approve the plat as proposed: A) Lots 1 & 3 would require a variance for laclc of frontage on a public roadway. B) Lots 1, 2 & 3 would require lot width variances. At the 100* setbaeJe from Bayside Road, Lot 2 is only 60' wide where 300' in lot width is normally required. Lots 1 & 3 do not front on a public roadway nor a private road outlot, hence they each technically require a 100% variance for defined lot width. C) Section 11.03.24, the definition of "minimum lot area requires the exclusion of private or public access easements from the calculation of lot area. With this in mind, the actual defined areas of Lots 1 & 2 are each about 4.0 acres, and that of Lot 3 is 4.95 acres. Each lot would require a lot area variance. I Zoning Pile #1470 October 10, 1989 Page 3 of 5 D) Variance to Section 11.10, Subdivision 21 (c) to allow 3 lot development without a private road outlot. DisCUSSiOB - In early discussions with staff, the applicant was advised that complete septic testing would be required for this 5 acre subdivision due to the slope concerns on the property. Additionally, it was suggested to applicant that a Planned Residential Development (PRD) be considered for this property due to its unique natural characteristics and unusual boundary configuration. As of a week before this writing, applicant had been requested by staff to provide a revised proposal showing outlot roads rather than road easements to serve the subdivision. In your discussion of the issues noted previously, staff would suggest reviewing sketches PI through P7. PI notes the neighborhood ownership pattern and the location of neighboring residences to the north. P2 notes the acreages of the three blocks of property within the subdivision. P3 is a reduced version of the applicant's concept plan for two new building Indicates the existing and proposed driveway system. Especially note the extreme length of driveway that would serve Lots 2 and 3. Prom Bayside Road, the driveway serving Lot 3 would be about 2,100 feet (or four-tenths of a mile) in length. Sketch P5 is the first of three conceptual layouts provided by staff for discussion purposes. This layout provides a 50* roAd out^lo^ to th6 Rolsrs^ord boundary# and uaas tha applicant's proposed 30* corridor for Lots 2 and 3. The alternate site for 1 is within Lot 1, although the contiguity is merely through a 10' wide neck. With this configuration, there is still an apparent need for an outlot east of the 30' driveway corridor, and this outlot would need to become part of Lot 1 to make up the required 5 acres for Lot 1. This sketch shows Lots 2 and 3 abutting the private road outlot and containing significant frontage on that outlot. The required 50' side and 100' rear setbacks for the existing house would be maintained. Please note that staff is not recommending this configuration, it is only for discussion purposes. Exhibit P6 is staff conceptual sketch B, which shows a typical "block" subdivision configuration that ignores the topography concerns for road construction. Each lot would have the required frontage on a private road and meet the lot width requirements. Also, the Asao property would have frontage and required width on the private road. ! i Zoning File *1470 October 10» 1989 Page 4 of 5 However, the negative aspects outweigh the positives in this layout. The required 5 acre mlnimums are not met. The road could not feasibly be constructed within the outlot due to the steep slopes which would have to be cut or filled. The road wipes out the only feasible dralnfield sites for Lot 2. The alternate site for Lot 1 is still on a separate outlot not attached to Lot 1. Again, conceptual Sketch B looks good on paper but does not accommodate the topography or physical characteristics of the property. Conceptual sketch C, Exhibit F7, suggests a planned residential development (PRD) giving each building site a 2* acre building envelope, with the remaining subdivision acreage as an open apace outlot. Outlots B & C would be private road outlots. Outlot C could conceivably be narrower than the standard 50' private road outlot, since it would serve only two lots. Staff Bernmaeiulstioa - Given the information provided by applicant, staff would recommend that the following issues be addressed for the applicant so that he can return with a revised proposal more in keeping with the subdivision requirements while still relating to the natural characteristics of the land: 1. Should this be a normal plat subdivision, or should it be a planned residential development? 2. Is there any justification to grant variances to allow development with easement roads rather than private road outlots*’ 3. If a private road outlot is required, should it continue to the Reiersgord property? Further, should a private road outlot be continued to the Asao and Deters properties to the north, so that the Luce Line driveway crossing for those two properties might ultimately not be necessary? 4. Will Planning Commission require that the alternate site for Lot 1 be within the boundaries of Lot 1, if this is a plat? or, if this becomes a PRD, will Planning Commission allow the alternate site for Lot 1 to be within the open space outlot? 5. Presuming that whether this is a plat or a PRD, the Planning Commission will not waive the standard requirement that outlot roadways be excluded from lot area, if the remaining acreage after exclusion of roadways is less than 15.0 acres, will Planning Commission consider granting of lot area variances with the subdivision? Zoning File #1470 October 10, 1989 Page 5 of 5 Additional CoMenta - 1. Applicant Is advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for plat review. 2. Once a revised proposal has been received, further review of drainage and other site concerns will conmence. % i Mff R /~y / A i %J CITY OF OROHO - SOBDIVISIO* APPLICATIOH TIOB , . nt ■y^gp iSag/j rlapL ns!^. PE0PBRT7 LOCATXOV Site Address fjOO .i.D.) 3I-M8-Z5H3-^^ ./Please check one - Property Property Identification Number (P z.3 I ^ - ooo^ V abstract or torrens? OFFICf Attach legal description to application r-77F-Tl“K - APPLICAHT Name Phone (home) “7^^ Dn^:^l Tarlcr/i Phone (work). ^7/~73/«^_ Address: I0l5^ T^nk^u/a City: Zip: (if different than applicant)w»-» ---------- j Phone (home) V7/- 75/£. 5<J»u-/x -dfOei// darfOr<^^ ^ Phone (work) 73/^_Name _ Address: /OIS (attach list if more than one) City:Zip: BUSTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 2 /'? /?0 /7C. Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)iX Residential; no. of units Other (specify)__ _ _ _ _ _ / Present Zoning District_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ PROPOSAL_ _ _ _ _ _ _Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Suladivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per n Acres 3^nerds' Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential _ _ _ Other (specify) J Bm*mm •• • •1 Mnn 1. 2. 3. 4. .i;LETS fUXLlMlllART APPLICATIOH 5. lOM MATBRIAL HBCBSSAn FOR Completed Application Form Preliminary Piat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sised envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property ovmers list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (parlc fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'y Slcetch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) $150.00 250.00 ^ Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) 300.00 -f 20.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 150.00* The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay al)j,>'^03itional^ees/€lita]^ished by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date f-rzsrf Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Pl2uining Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. rxa Mi un 09/oi/at MTOi MS NENNEPIH COUNTY PHOPCRTY IHFOUtUTION SYST€H PROPERTY QHNERS USTOMCR mmTA)»mR SS M-1I7-2S 11 0001 Mm MYSXOf RO VCl CAPITAL INC ¥CX CAPITAL DC PO iON STS LONB LAKf HN SSS54•001PROP AOOt CHNCR NANI TAXPAYERlA SO 04-117-IS II •ASSS OAYSXOE RO VCl CAPITAL INC VCI CAPITAL INC PO OON S7S LGNO LAICE HN S5SSACOMER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO Sl-110-21 A1 OOOf •Alls NATERTQMi RO N R A N E PLAliC TaCNAEL R A NARY i PLAM AlAS NATERTOMN RO NAPU PLAIN m 55159 G so 0A-117>I1 II 0001 OASAO BAYSIK RO J A OLSON APE OLSON JAMES A OLSON ASAO OAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN ffl 55159SO 0A-117-I1 II 0001 OAAAS OAYSIDE RD HAP JOHNSON HARK S A PATRICIA P AAA5 OAYSIDE RD HAPU PUTN MN 5S1S9SO Sl-llS-Il AI 0001 OAIAS CMIPPENA LA m L SORENSEN ETAL R05ERT L S0REN5;CN AIA5 CHIPPENA LANE MAPLE PLAIN m 55150 PROP ARM M 51-110-23 42 0005 00030 ABORESS UNASSXOFCO 3S 31-11B-23 43 0003 OOOia ADDRESS UNASSX^COl / V OMNER NAME NIItaFREO H BRYANT NINraFREO M RRYANT TAXPAYER NDtaFREO H BRYANT HirtaFREO H RRYANT NRME/AOOR C/0 NiBLE SmCS OD MERLE STILES 1001 LAKEYlcM TER LONO LAKE »M 55154 ISOl LAKEVIEN TER LONG LAKE MN 55154 M PROP AMm 10. 11-110-21 41 0007 00010 ADORERS UNASSXGNEO f IS ll-llS-21 91 OOOS 04100 OAYSIDE RO vj OMER NAME P ASAO A J ASAO SCHUTZ-O’NEILL CORPORATION TAXPAYER PHILLIP ASAO SCHUTZ-O’NEILL CORPORATION NAMS/AOOR 125 1URNNAH ROAD 1015 TONKANA RD Q MAPLE PLAIN NN 55159 LONO LAKE MN 55154 10 11-110-21 41 0011 IS ll-llS-21 94 0001 Vir PROP AMR 00145 TURNHAM RO OOOIS ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO COMER NAME KEITH L HQMELL ET AL STATE OF MINN TAXPAYER OAVIO A DETERS STATE OF MINN €NRME/AOOR 145 TURNHAH RO HAPLE PLAIN m 55359 REPORT NO. PIA15A01 PAGE AIS 0A-117-I1 II 0001 OASOO OAYSIDE RO SCHUT2-0’NEILL CORPORATION SCHUTZ-O'NEILL CORPORATION 1015 TONCAHA RO L0N6 LAKE m 5515ASO 0A-1I7-I1 II 0001 0AA55 OAYSIDE M) MAP JOHNSON HARK S A PATRICIA P AA55 OAYSIDE RO MAPLE PUIN m 55159 oM Sl-nS-25 ooos (M3S5 CHIPPENA LA FREDERICK E SHEHANER JR ETAL FRED E SHEHANEK RT 2 BON 14HAPLE PLAIN fti 55SS*3« S1-11D-2S 4S 0004 00125 TURNHAM RO P R ASAO A J A ASAO PHILIP R A JOY A ASAO 125 TURNHAH RO HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 rH IS 11-110-11 A1 0009 OOOia ADDRESS UNASSXGNED NATURE CONSERVANCY NATURE CONSERVANCY 1111 5TH ST S E SUITE 119 MPLS MN 55919 IS 11-lia-Il 94 0004 OOOIS ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO THOMAS E REIERSGORD ETAL THOMAS E REIERSGORD 4500 N 44TH ST MPLS MN 55414 =tfc •I .*) • •I ' k t VCIc^xtal ■ ^ ! Lv ' . • •ll.: -...... i. <■ocr-6 \w\ VO Cjpiut, inc. BQ B<aJg»long Ute; MN SSJS6 • «l2)4»-2«7 October 3, 1989 JEANNE A. MABUSTH CI«‘’o?’oJoSo”‘"’ Orono Village Hall P< 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Residential Subdivision 4300 Bayside Road Dear Ms. Mabusth: three loe°rasidentlal'’suMniSloS'’o£'a*^^°" * proposed 4300 Bayside Road, X « — --- If blacktopping of the north-south access ro,H „• u84 IS being considered, the followiJS J^oad from Highway pertinent. xoiiowing information may be The blue quarter-section map which i .. fS^"pr‘:pe‘J?5 a‘£St‘s^?;ft‘?o*3 Proper^?. ?h”t"‘^a'^al“l'’' ■’« thou,h“Jt":ppear«, S:Sat‘?l„' tS:, corner of our property was southwest appears to be about a thirH that there -d^unlJoppr^S:particularly in wet years. * bXacIctoppln9,'*it^obvlously'^would”iMt*^fk°'”®'^ before the more usible again? partial acre «PP?oJ?il?e°"® visit on any of the above Ispp.opriate, . wUl be most pleased to be available? Very truly yours. t P. White f . i 4 r: p / ^ •*/^ o -Va?/.'V-' As. " i•V^ /?/o -V. I Se9M6 ’c.^"t 330 a3 a A«|X| (iClM^<N6 l9%S4.'irf ' \ I .1 3 A ■ 2 y ',^1 2> ^^^00 »I Ooe ^V/ k S 0 . 'dj$^ * • ^ ^ 44S.04 tS»*46*0l*E / CtfS^Mi »jMi rAtfwrur - yy y ✓» \,i J *»A •,%MS9*44‘32"W 393 53 e ,,fA :o «v<i4. '^NrO*39 ’5^ 129 29 AJlfltW4D4.l^»Cr efi^^*tr»i OwN»!>t5^i^ I -zoo •{ % A A 5 Jiom ,vP-' /-•'IJ' j -I *v*Af //^y. 993.33 cr €A&^ I -zoo Tfri— Dfljv/g’w(kV sysTWVv 1 % ! I =200 ■i F-(i» I =200 Ift.i i O.U.C 1 Subd. 21. Special Requirements for Class II and III iSubdivisions. A. Improvements. All public and/or private improvements required by the City to be completed by the subdivider prior to Final Plat approval^ shall be fully completed and shall have had a certificate of satisfactory completion issued by the City Engineer prior to endorsement of the Final Plat by the City. All public and/or private improvements required by the City to be completed by the subdivider after Final Plat approval shall be fully set forth in a subdivider's agreement to be executed prior to Final Subdivision approval. All local streets in subdivisions where sewer and water are not available shall be private unless otherwise approved by the City at preliminary subdivision approval. The City reserves the rignt to determine whether a road is to be public or private in all areas of the City. B. Public Roads. Public streets and roads will be required to be platted, constructed and dedicated to the City when required by the Council consistent with the recc' *«ndations of the Planning Commission and the City staff and the established City practices and design standards. Public roads shall be completed and issued a certificate of satisfactory completion by the City Engineer prior to Final Plat approval or, when specifically authorized by the Council, shall be subject to the conditions of a subdivider's agreement to be executed prior to Final Plat approval. >ved < C. Private Roads. When the Preliminary Plat has been approved on the basis of a private access road providing the only access to three or more lots, the private road shall be identified on the Final Plat as a separate outlot. The private? road shall be identified by name if the road serves four or more lots. Whenever a private road outlot is proposed, the subdivider shall be required to provide for a permanent homeowner's association or road maintenance agreement acceptable to the City in order to insure ownership and maintenance of the road outlot. D. Road and Utilities Easements. The Council may, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and/or City staff, require the subdivider to convey to the City certain road anJ! utilities easements permitting public ingress, egress and access over private roads as a condition of Final Subdivision approval. 1. Whenever a private access road is authorized, the required outlot shall be included on and conveyed in a road and utilities easement in the standard City form. 2. Whenever areas of the plat are to be set aside for public or private utility construction and use, said areas shall be described and dedicate-:, for public use on the plat. This shall include areas shown on rec-u.d plat drawings as "drainage and utilities easements". 3. Whenever a road and utilities easement is required, the easement shall be fux:.y executed prior to Final Plat approval using the legal descriptions of the Final Plat and shall thereafter be filed in the chain of title of the property concurrent with the filing of the Final Fiat. ORONO CC 442 (4-1-84) . n I S 11.03 21. "Improvements, Private" - Any improvement, required by this Chapter, which improvement the City or subdividec shall construct at subdivider's expense and for which the City will not assume any responsibility for its maintenance and operation and which shall not be dedicated to the City. 22. "Improvements, Public" - Any improvement, required by this Chapter, which improvement the City or subdivider shall construct at subdivider's expense and for which the City will ultimately assume the responsibility for its maintenance and opera tion upon issuance of the certificate of satisfactory completion. 23. "Lot" - A tract, plot or portion of a subdivision or other parcel of land intended as a unit for the purpose, whether immediate or future, or transfer of ownership or for building development. Every platted lot shall be a buildable lot or an outlot. 24. "Lot Area, Minimum" - Each lot shall contain the minimum required for each proposed lot as prescribed in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. In rural zones not served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain a minimum of two acres of con**iguous dry bu Idable land exclusive of wetlands, public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any surface water or areas at or below the flood plain elevation for a specific property. All rural lots must comply with the City's on-site septic system provisions of the City Code. In urban areas served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain contiguous dry buildable land equal to the minimum areas as prescribed in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code or half-acre, whichever is less, (exclusive of public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian ease ments, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any surface water wetlands or areas at or below the flood plain eleva tion for a specific property) and have legal access to the building site without encroachment of a wetland or flood plain area. 25. "Lot, Buildable" - A lot or combination of lots or outlots which meet all of the requirements of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code and this Chapter foe the intended purpose. 26. "Lot, Outlot" - A lot which is intended only for public or private roadways, open space or other use, which use must be restricted by the appropriate easement and which use must be approved by the City at the time of final plat approval. The use of the outlot will thereafter be restricted by the appropriate restrictive covenant or open space easement. 27. "Lot, Corner" - A lot situated at the intersection of two (2) streets, the interior angle of such intersection not exceeding 135 degrees. ORONO CC 419 (4-1-84) I I *. !>•r 3 f>' »4 '4 To: Proas Oates Subject s Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Coouniasion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernh»rdson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 15, 1989 ^1^71 Garyle L. Dphoff, 2699 Kelly Avenue — Conditional Use Permit — Public Hearing Pertinent Oirdlnance - Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Prohibition, use permit is required for repair of sea wall. Ust of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map - Site Plan “ MCWD Staff Report - MCWD Transmittal Letter - Applicant's Engineer's Report - Elevation/Cross Section Conditional Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit D E F G H Review of A|K>lication - ,.,.11 K^* engineer proposes to repair and strengthen wall by providing horizontal beams to be Installed between the The City Engineer finds no problem with the proposed repair again his report has not been received but will tain recommendations to applicant regarding certain additional construction features that may be considered by applicant. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for sea wall within Walters Port Lagoonsubject to the following: 1. Approval and issuance of permits by both MCWD and DRN. 2. Applicant to obtain a building permit prior to the repair of the wall. ft 0f \ V "-/a CITY OF OROBO - GZHERAL LAUD USB APPLICATION ^ ^ PROPERTY LOCATION ^ ^ Sit« Address —F^^.c<?U.a<c S'S't'^l Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 7^ ! • Please check one - Property ______ abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only)torrans? on*«^Jr^rSu^*ly^ description to applioation if not inciudad APPLICANT Name _T^6k.v\il< L. Phone (home) ^“7 / - Phone (work) 3'^ / ! _ _^‘h _ _ _ _ _ _ City Zip TS-33/ OWNER (if different than Name y the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee $100.00 a)Residential accessory Dse $150.00 b)Institutional (church, school, < $150.00 c)Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d)Commercial/Industrial Dse $200.00 f)Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PID ~ see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATZOBS -- -- --------- mIS.’SS va"?S*^ <♦ “"sultant fees) - $150.00 Easement Vacation - - - -$ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____ $250.00 Rezoning _- $100.00 Appeals - - - -- Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PSOPERT? Present Zoning District Lft IB Present Dse of Property Residential otner (specify) DESCRIPTIOH OP REQUEST Describe REQUEST request in detail: _ju ivcrV- gL’ojmAf*— REQUIRED SUBMITTRLS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners with'*n 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. Plat Map. 8. . As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature ___________________ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLZCAHT'S SI6IATURB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature*Date OWBBRS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission m'^mbers, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of fail's ragiieinr.— Owner's signature ^ ^ ^ ^ Date Applicant must have a^ submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. DATE 10/02/89 HENNEPIN CrXfNTY PROPERTY INFORHATIQN SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LISTBATCH QQSOPMER NAfC TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 20-117-25 14 000402455 LYOIARO AVE J I J BERG JAMES BERG 2455 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR m 55551PROP AOOR aOCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 20-117-25 14 000405225 CARMAN RO JIN FARNNAM JOHN T FARNHAM 5225 CARMAN RO EXCELSIOR Ml 55551 ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 20-117-25 14 0012 05275 CARMAN RO SORAMAE G NALLAOAY SORAMAE G NALLAOAY 5275 CARMAN ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55551 PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 21-117-25 25 0040 02701 KELLY AVE C E 6ARRITY A A GARRITY CHARLES E GARRITY 2701 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 PROP AOOR OHNER NAtC TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 21-117-25 25 0045 02705 HALTERS PORT LA OONALO N NELSON ETAL DONALD N NELSON RT 2 EXCELSIOR MN 55551 PROP AOOR OFtCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 21-117-25 25 0046 00058 ADDRESS UKASSIGTCD DEAN E TERRY DEAN E TERRY 2710 PENCE LANE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 fk - / 14 0007 AVE58 20-117-250264S FELLY S I fl KAPLAN GARY aiPtlBAUH 2645 KELLY AVE EXXELSIOR MN 5555158 20-117-25 14 001005245 CARMAN RO THOMAS P NELSON ETAL THOMAS P NELSON 5245 CARtrKN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 21-117-25 25 0055 02700 KELLY AVE R 8 RICE too RICE RICHARD 8 A DEBORAH 0 RICE 2700 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 21-117-25 25 0041 02644 KELLY AVE OIL UTHOFF DARYL L t LUCY S UPHOFF 2644 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 21-117-25 25 0044 02707 HALTERS PORT U HUBERT 0 OLUIT ETAL HUBERT D BLUNT 2707 NALTERS PORT LN EXCELSIOR ftl 55551 38 21-117-25 25 0047 00058 ADDRESS UNASST«>IED A J MCDERtlOTT 111 ET AL ANDREH J MCDERMOTT III AND JEROME L SKIFTER 2702 HALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55531 REPORT NO. P145S401 PACE 458 20-117-25 1402645 KELLY AVE G DIRNDAUn I 8 S 6II0«ALf) GARY 81RNBAUM 2645 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 5555158 20-117-25 14 001105265 CARMAN RO RAYMOND J KOSAK RAYMOND J KOSAK 5265 CARMAN ROAD SO EXCELSIOR m 55351 58 21-117-25 25 0034 02702 HALTERS PORT LA A J ^X:DEIHOTT III ET AL ANOREM J MCDERMOTT III AND JEROME L SKIFTER 2702 NALTERS PORT LA E>XELS10R MN 55551 58 21-117-25 23 0042 02703 MLTERG PORT LA HILLIAH H REESE JR A HIFE HILLIAM H REESE JR 2705 HALTERS PORT LANE EXCELSIOR rtl 55551 58 21-117-25 25 0045 02704 HALTERS PORT U H H A S K DUMLLEY HILLIAM M A SUSAN R DUNKLEY 2704 HALTERS PORT LANE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 38 21-117-25 23 0048 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGT^D ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING INC ENVIRONMENTAL PLAItlINO INC 4550 IDS CENTER MPLS MN 55402 3 J 4n 5 mm HATE id/02/afBATCH OOSarnmn mmTAXPAYCBmm/ksm^ * NAHE/AOOB Si n-117-2S Zl OOAf OOOSi AOORCSS U4ASSIGNE0 D t L UPNOfF DAmrL L i LUCY S UPHOFF KELLY AVIEHCCLSIOII m S5551 HENNEPIN COUNTY PBOPEHTY INfOHHATlON SYSTEM PHOPEHTY OHNERS LIST58 EX*117>:S 25 005102710 PENCE LA DEAN C TERRY DEAN f TERKY 2710 PENCE LANE EXCELSIOR MN 55551TAXPAYER TOTAL RATtf!005 00021 REPORT NO. PIA5SA01 PAGE 1058 21-117<25 52 000702715 PErCE LA MICHAEL HALLEY NONES INC MICHAEL HALLEY lONES INC 11095 VIKING m 0580 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 555A4 J :.3:) A Vf (i i- » L- f n ri 1 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEftJEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY RNOMLEDGE ATJD BELIEF. DATE A icl^&i I Huy i) ! . , Wis • •>0 0* r- a / ‘ ^ ■' '•APPLE- diu.' - V _2?=?v, ^^■i^r'. '••r '' •** ».<l /' 5 / Vy''/'y%A^4i} r V ^■yyA A *- —»— 4»i |J^ ^ . :** 0|^ # T ------ --- ■■ . :t'^/ ■>s ! / I*) 10 - A . .V'^r - » ” L% y. f K »» ^ • •.AM -W/ ■\, \ 'x'V / / 9^ X,V •>• ••'■* ^0 y y •» - •-2 0 t a. /1 s .1 ’. -► v.% *#>^ is ' ^ I " ’-V V.l<.5' *• i “t »W»1>I »«i •, 1.. *M«j 1>«*l V \1' a: COVE !i Vv-i > r Vi“ '**■ cn .«•■••• -:; * ■,'«) ■ *• ^ ■' 3 • ”'j' ■j< ".'•Igj\^?=rr.J >^r, ij a <s. tiO *••••- V, • ii. :♦»> •;' H*) “* :.j-/lS‘’ i 5r> - *i‘'* ------------- ..j „ •«'•«» IS 'hiL .*5 ” i*»* •u.O /5r^TT:^.^ .'/t ;*' • ,j •-• '-'‘'-ti |5 f\0 f r LX ‘ ‘ -; -. ..• . . -- “.------- Vir.s. •. .V- •»•-•. *• •.• • . • .• - • • . V. • • . »^.v^ .•< V r*.‘M. (^\3<g) Q' ? 5MVVA4L.- /yvcS'<^0446ib o O-' 3 R V a J po <»-T l)uv^U'^ xr^XX G-'^w #»H «. £4 iWj I 4 t.i# rf ? -I +!■rr / < ...'1=1 ^ kfl Penult Application Wo, 89-13S Ownert October 13, 1989 Locationi Project* Welters Port Legoon Association 2699 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 City ol Orono, Sec. 21BC, Carman Bay, Lake Minnetonka Dredging to remove 900 cubic yards o£ material from a a mmon user channel and cove, repair an existing sea wall and Install a 15 foot boulder jetty. Applicable Rules* Rule E Rule F Dredging Shoreline Improvement It >its Reviewed* 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Permit Application No. 89-135 received August 7, 1989. Site plan received August 7, 1989. Structural analysis for the retaining wall received August 7, 1989. Cross sections and elevation of the retaining wall received Aug. 7, 1989. Letter from the DNR to the applicant dated August 8, 1989. Letter from the District to the applicant dated August 30, 1989 informing him of the BocU'd action on August 24, 1989. Sur-/ey of the lagoon area dated October 4, 1939. Dredging plan received September 19, 1989. Volume computations of spoil to be removed received September 19, 1989. Staff Review Summar-/1 The project involves dredging to remove approximately 900 cubic yards of material from a common user channel and lagoon area adjacent to Carman Bay, Lake Minnetonka in the City of Orono. The applicant also proposes to rebuild an existing wood sea wall along the west side of the lagoon, and place a boulder jetty extending from the west edge of the channel, 15 feet into Lake Minnetonka. In the past, the Board has not allowed the construction of a jetty projecting Into Lake Minnetonka to prevent the migration of sand. The Board reviewed two permits in August 1988, Nos. 88-106 and 88-107, proposing the construction of a rock jetty for this purpose. During that review, the applicant suggested that the problem appeared to occur only during low lake levels, such as have been present on Lake Minnetonka for the past few years. District staff recommends removal of this portion of the project because it does not meet District standards for shoreline improvements and would set a precedent for placement of fill in Lake Minnetonka to alleviate a temporary problem caused by low water levels. If the applicant believes that this will be a continuing problem, it Is recommended that he monitor movement of sediment along the shoreline for several seasons to determine the effect of lake elevation on the lateral drift of sediment. A 15-foot wide bottom width channel is proposed. The bottom depth is to be 923.6. 8 of 21 S- tI *t MIIMIUEHAHA cnrrK WATERSHED DinTPICT P.O. Boi 387. WayzitJ. Minnesota 55391 lat nUwdR llaNeD 6<0BDw-c.WBg>wila^.Cfc^undhy PWMit Application Mo. 89-135 Ovrneri Locatloni Projecti Walters Port Laqoon Association 2699 Kelly Avenue Excelsior. MN 55331 City of Orono, Sec. 21BC, Carman Bay, Lake Minnetonka Dredging to remove doproximately 900 cubic yafds of r.dterial from a common user channel and cove, repair an existing sea wall and install a 15-foot boulder jetty. Dear Mr. Garrltyi At the regularly scheduled October 19, 1989 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed. Action was taken allowing the District staff to Issue your permit only after receipt and staff approval of the followingi 1. 2. 3. 4. SpoU disposal location and method. Deletion of the boulder jetty from the project. Review and approval by the DNR. Review and approval by th« City of Orono. Please be advised that the project iS not authorized until the above has been submitted to me and you have been notified of permit Issuance from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Engineers for the District Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. CCl Board L. Smith C^^^rauss, DNR L-Clty of Orono \ ^1 1; *• KRECH, CyBRlEN,(S- I MUELLER C mss, inc ARCHITECTS O^ENGINEERS 611S CAHU. AVE?«J€ MVER GPC7VE HeCHTS. MN SS37S 812 4514603 Ccto*'^r 13, 1989 W . Andrew McDeraott 2702 Walters Port Orono, MN 55331 RE: WALTERS POh .AGOON - REPAIR OF EXISTING WALL Dear Mr. McDermott: The attached retaining wall was reviewed for structural integritv and found to be adequate based on the following assumptions: diameter poles are performing adequate in their existing condition. 2. The 3 X 12 timbers shall have Fb * 1000 PSI or greater 3. Lateral soil pressure of 45 PSF. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, James H. Krech, P.E. 12707 KRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS, INC. EN, ^VSS,iNC ENGINEERS SHTS. MN SS07S 612-4S1-460S a ■ ' EXISTING WALL VREPAIR EXISTING WOOD CAP ---------•x:INSTALL NEW3x12 R.S. TREATED TIMBERS 17 LONG —W/2-3/8*xB* LAG BOLTS EX8TMO CABLE TE BACKS TO REMAM MMM WATER L CXISTMO 12* ROUND POSTTOREMABI---- EXSTliQ WATER L EL B2S.31 ■l-iWi* CLASS I EXISTilG GRADE PL i>saQ. aa BACKFU.'2l'aS\Tl5 m 'Granular backfill PLASTIC WOVEN' FI.TER FABRIC & fig ^SUBSOL SHVSM 5\ur * SCREW ANCHOR SUPPORTS flEPLACE DAMAGED OR INEFECTIVE ANCHORS WITH NEW SCREW ANCHORS___ SLIDE 3x12 BETWEEN POLES AND EXIST. 2x6 fEXISTING 2x6 WALLTO REMAIN & NAILED TO 3x12 existing POLES: PERFORMING ADEQUATE IN EXISTING CONDITIONS TYPICAL CROSS SECTION SCALE: 1*-2' iewed for structural integrity he following assumptions: poles are performing adequate ve Fb = 1000 PSI or greater PSF. ns. ■EXISTING «• 10UNC ±240 SAL SPACilQ REMOVE EXISTMG 2xS VATEH LE WEI ^2(6 VA 1► Ir F E lEN ■XK lOV ITW 'E \Qi!x9 «» •« EL 026.31 ^ • TYPICAL WALL ELEVATION SCALE 1*-2* ALTERS PORT L.4COOM — REPAIR EXISTING WALL —10/89 i k. J Bonestroo Rosene Andertik & AssociatesEngineers A Architects C*» 0 lor>ttt«a Af ledt^T W IlDwnv Af .utgn C HftchjiB I H•Ann C 0t!9r. H Orr E C»«t Pi i N9yCl »• aodM 3 ST'iAchf .VtAhrsP L lAfVM. Pi A Michni W H mt H OunMC Ibylii M A PM.¥$tn A, HiAwrv p^ Pi¥trn» T «xt»rtne Wf04vg C kOi^otE HW Pi ¥s€^ C 4f*eh. n Jjnn I Ma-ftiyj. Pp l>wnwr A AAdetkon. PiC ^iin. A ■ A ThOWnf AAgul •#Oa WI J lAQINfAn Ap Mer% A iMk p|^V» i C jivv^ •!n \fa»t Pfff A*«rth^v^ A f A (*J»y » Hyirff Jii'r Pi VfcW A <mny»i API C'-JvAt H AfCnjnnt A f •<»vm I All V ApMi^yiy N ja »*A M OltfJA S«vj-i M Phrfiil C A Aliov«nb«r IS, 1989City of OroBo Box 88 Crystal Bay, HN 5S323 Attni Ja«tui# Mabusth Re I Valters Port Lagoon Our File No. 139-1471 Dear Jeannei Ve reviewed the proposed wood sea wall repair along the north side of Walters Port Lagoon. The proposed repair procedure is acccptabls but a few items need to be clarified. The proposed planking should extend to or below the existing water lines which would be approximately 6 feet rather than the 4 feet Indicated. The Joists on the planking should be staggered. The disposal of excess material should be reviewed with the city. The proposed constcuctlen could add 10 years could add 10 years of life to the sea wall. The weakest part of the wall after construction would be the existing pest. If you have any questions please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLZX 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 I TO:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Conunission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:November 15, 1989 Subject: 11472 Dave Carlson/Jim Smith, 1960 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 - Conditional use permit required for non-conforming use. The property is located in the LR-IA iuning district. The non-conforming use consists of a retail operation. The previous retail use was approved in Resolution #2193, expired June 8, 1988. No commercial use of the property has existed on the property since early 1987. Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (A) - Non-conforming use may not be changed to another non-conforming use. Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (B) - Whenever a non-conforming use of structure or land is discontinued and remains discontinued for a period of 12 months, any future use of said structure or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this zoning chapter. Technically, the City would have to grant a variance as commercial use has been discontinued for over 12 months. The boat sales operation was never realized. Staff will discuss in more detail further in memo. Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (J) - Apply to Uses Only. The non-conforming use provisions of the zoning chapter apply only to the use which land and buildings are put and do not apply to situations where location or height of structure, lot size or other factors not Involving the use of the premises prevent strict conformance of the zoning chapter. Where, however, such a situation existed legally under the prior applicable law, the Council will not unreasonably restrict strict compliance and will generall/ look with favo** on granting a variance under Section 10.06. Hence if a legal non-conforming use existed on a property and substantial investments and improvements, etc. have been made, it would appear that this section of the code would allow Council to consider variances to the above referenced sections that establish standards for non-conforming uses as long as the variances deal only with uses and not standards related to setback, height, etc. 1r Zoning 11472 November 15, 1989 Page 2 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Application Property Owners List Plat Map Resolution #2193 Mabusth's Letter 11/10/8 Gerhardson's Memo 6/2/87 Floor Plan Survey/Site Plan Building Permit Issued 9/1/87 Original Staff Memo Reviewing CUP in 1987 Toberman Letter of 8/30/88 Resolution #961 Review of Current Application > The original application (review Exhibit D) Involved sailboat sales and nautical ship store retail use. Sailboats were allowed to be stored in the exterior yard (review Exhibit H), based on the length and size of the sailboat. Seven stalls were designated for the keeping of boats in the exterior yard. The current retail operation proposed by applicants would be a fishing supply retail operation selling the following type of items; 1. maximum length fishing boat - 18*; 2. small mote*s for fishing boats; 3. wave runners (personal watercraft); 4. agents for pontoon sales (pentoon boats not to be stored on property, but to be sold from manufacturer in Wisconsin); 5. live bait (apprx. 5 tanks 30"x30"); 6. pre-packaged snacks (no microwave or preparation of food proposed); 7. pop. The applicants do not propose storing boats in the exterior yard except on a week-end during sale period and at that the fishing boats would never be stacked higher than 6' high privacy fence. The applicant would maintain retail sales area to north side of building and may use boat stall area on east portion of paved area for an additional parking stall. Applicant does wish to submit the same site plan for current use. 2oning Fil« #1472 November 15« 1989 Page 3 of 5 Hr. Carlson confirms that the hours of operation would be between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., seven days a week. There would be 2 full-time employees; one during the week, two possibly on week-ends and an additional part-time clerical person later on. Signage proposed would be as with 1987 conditional use permit approval. A sign will be attached to existing structure. Applicant advises that it need not exceed the allowed 12 s.f. As for lighting, applicant claims the only lighting necessary may be security lighting as the operation will be during day-time hours. The proposed use would appear to be either equal to or less intense than the sailboat operation as approved by Council in 1987 per directives of Resolution #961 (Exhibit L) and Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (J) noted above. Staff would remind members that Resolution #961 was approved by Council at the time of the rezoning of portions of the subject property in 1988 (east 70' of property). The existing gas station use was allowed to remain on the property in 1978 but Resolution #961 encouraged future owners to consider a less intense commercial use of the property. Staff can confirm that the surface run-off has been redirected to the catch basin with the installatio*' of curbs and regrading of property within the east yard. Drainage has not been collecting or being restricted during wet periods nor have there been signs of freezing creating a slippery condition at the edge of County Road 15. Both Hennepin County and the Orono staff approved the drainage plans installed by applicant. Access onto Shoreline Drive has been closed with a single access off of Spates Avenue. Median areas with the installation of curbs have been installed along Shoreline Drive. A privacy fence has been extended and connected to fence running along west portion of property line along the north lot line with the 3H' extension to Shoreline Drive. The most northern median located on Shoreline Drive yard has not been filled with gravel and should be installed prior to the opening of the retail operation. In addition, staff would recommend that applicant advise how the median at the south end is to be treated. The County discourages plantings and recommends just the graveled area, although upon inspection of the area attempts have been made to install plantings. Greenary exists around the lift station and in the west yard area. Underground gas tanks have been removed and the oil spoils stored from the former transmission operation have been disposed per PCA standards. Obviously, the pump islands have also been removed as required by the City. As of this writing, I have not received Mr. Cook's response, but at the site inspection Cook noted that he would ask for the following: 1. Median filled with gravel within north yard of Shoreline Drive. Zoning File #1472 November 15, 1989 Page 4 of 5 2. Privacy fence to be repaired where necessary. 3. Clean-up existing fill in median in south yard - more gravel needed. Issues for the City's consideration in the current review: 1. We are once again being asked to approve a slight change in a non-conforming retail use of the property, seemingly less intense but also nay be equal tc a sailboat sales operation. 2. The non-conforming use has been discontinued for over a twelve month period of tine. In reviewing the staff nemo (Exhibit J) and the resolution approving the original conditional use permit in 1987 (Exhibit D), there was no .^ference or forewarning to the applicant of the special non-conforming sections of the code that were applicable to this property. If you review the last section of the resolution, specifically Item 5 of the conditions of approval, it notes as follows: "Authorities granted by this conditional use permit run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (June 8, 1988)." It should be noted for the record that a building permit was issued to Mr. Toberman to make the necessary and required repairs to the structure anJ to the yard area on September 1, 1987. Based on the directives of that specific resolution approving the conditional use permit, it would appear that all the applicant would have to do is obtain a permit within a year from the approval date. In a letter from Mr. Toberman to the City dated August 30, 1988, he requested an extension of the original approvals granted to the property (Exhibit K). Review Exhibit E, in Mabusth's response although the expiration of June 8, 1988 had been reached for the original conditional use permit, note the letter does not reflect concern that the use had been discontinued for over a year, but merely addresses the fact that a new conditional use permit would be required for either another sailboat use or a new use. Ill the issuing of building permits for the major repair and upgrading of the former transmission site, the City ray have placed itself in a compromising position, but the building permit was issued in good faith that a sailboat operation would be installed as soon as a Certificate of Occupancy was issued. It should be once again noted that Mr. Toberman has fulfilled all v''e conditions set forth in the original resolution. 7nn<ng #1477 Hovember 15» 1989 Page 5 of 5 In consideration of the many issues raised in the review of this application, staff would ask that members refer to Section 10.03, Subdivision 5; Resolution #961 (Exhibit L); Resolution #2193 (Exhibit D)j Exhibit E; and Exhibit K. Options of Action - 1. Denial. If the current conditional use permit and variance is to be denied, please refer to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 for the necessary findings. Please note technically we are dealing with a variance to the non- conforming use sections of the code. Refer also to Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 (A) for necessary findings for denial of conditional use permit. Planning Commission should also be prepared to provide directives for applicant as to the phasing out of the non-conforming use to a conforming residential use. 2. Approval of conditional use permit and variance. If approved, please refer to the same code sections noted above and to the specific findings addressed by staff above. Approval should be conditioned on one or more of the following conditions! a) Repair of privacy fence. b) Installation of gravel within median area and general clean-up of most southern median area. c) Install "No Parking" signs on east side of building. d) Security lighting shall be directed downward on property and not out towards adjacent residential properties. e) Parking stalls to be striped on paved area. f) The stacking of fishing boats for exterior sales purposes shall be limited to 6* in height. Upon approval, staff will work with Hennepin County Department of Transportation to install crosswalk in approved location. » CITY OF OROIK) - 6EHBRAL LAND DSE APPLICATIOHJ^fc ^ ^ PROPBKTT LOCATIOH ^ f ^ *" Site Address /?6c St:(C 7L ___________ Property Identification Nuraber (P»I«D.) /o - n ^ ~ 2 S ~ *V Z.oo ^ Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICAn Name ^Asr L!>QkJ Phone (home) Phone 01 1Address -^^7 Sr^.City a/VV i *2Xp rennm Mf than aoDlicant)Phone (home)- ‘ ■ ' V‘__ ^ ; Name Phone . V / i Address i OUJ City Zip 'JJ/ Date Prooertv Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ,v>W FBBS - COHDITIOHAL OSS PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee _ _ _ _ $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use _ _ _ _ $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) _ _ _ _ $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Conunercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' cf lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIOHS , . * »$150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation with Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule mOBZBT OSB OF PKOPBRTT Present Zoning District _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Residential p _ _ _ - Other (specify) Ccm-' DBCRIPTION OF RBQOBST n Describe request in detail: 4 rJySo.a- 4: jav <U »'f i^- - - - - - - - - --- --- - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - --—- SBQOIBED SUBMITTALS i 1. Completed Application Form. ' 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 340-3271) . u 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. • 4. Certificate of survey. . , j •'5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). r>^6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 1, Plat Map. 8. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list or any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - - - - APPLICANT'S SIGMATORB . • ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )tnowledge. ^ y Applicant's L Date /O ^ ~ OmiBRS SIGNATURE • . . , j r ..uThe owner hereby aclcnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature <c .. ~~ - _ Date __■■T‘0r?~ ~ ------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. #1472 I r r- • • I f'11 1 .4UI ■:> I jC # 36 lO-llT-23 n COOl GECRCe R 2C10 S>CRELINP ORI VE kitZAW Hh 55391 38 10-IV7-?3 31 CC89 DANIEL CREAR 1980 S'ATES AVE LAtZATt NN 55391 38 10-117-23 62 COOS A C ASCHENRECK JP C7 1930 SHORELINE CHi vt kAYZATA NN 55391 ■ .j *f.! • •: 36 IC* 117-23 ^2 0015 H TOURMCCAU 2060 SPATES AVE tiAYZATA «M 553SI 33 lC-117-23 62 0022 CRAIG OLSON I960 SbORatNE OR WAY2ATA NN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0CC8 MARIETTA H ANOERSON 2055 SPATES AVE kAYZATA NN 55291 38 10-U7-23 31 0095 TERRY C horse 2C80 SPATES AVE CFC n O HN 553SI ’8 lO-llT-23 <»2 0017 LYtE VICAERHAN interlachen la EXCELSIOR HA 55331 38 10-U»-;' 0002 JOIN T SPENC* 20M) AO SHCRR OR (tAYZATA NN 55391 i8 28 lO-in-23 62 0012 5CC9^EXCEL^10R BLVO APT 126 ST LOUIS PARK HN 55616 38 IO-llT-23 SI 0C90 RICHARD V STINSON 2060 SPATES AVE rayzata NN SSSfl 36 UHllT-21 61 OOOT ALJN HETTtfS * AN« NETTLES I960 »<OAfLtNE ON ORONO NN 95S91 ; ? I 38 lO-llT-23 62 0016 RGNALC J PRINEAS 1980 heritage on MAVZATA NN 95S91 I K • • •• •• TOTAL L OOOIT f ( 38 V40-llT-23^l 0066 STATE 38 10-li* 2S SI 009* haariet spates TWANGEAO 2060 SPATES AVE NAYZATA NN 59S51 38 10-117-2S 62 0016 SAILORS h ORLO • CX IT6 CRYSTAL RAY NN 55S23 38 10-: 17-23 645 0021 CANIEL CREAR 1980 SPATES AVE VAYZATA NN 59391 t « . city of OROISO RCSOLUTIOfl O^Trtf CrVCOUNCIW NO. ji wmoumoH oumti A comtrtemAL on rn HDOicxtia Boam com ncTTOo li.tj, fonmixoa s fj)■ ffci • rxiiS fiiia WfiMKASt Smith'* Narlna* Inc. (harainaftar "tha An intaraat in tha prepart/ loeatad at 19B0 Shorallna Orlaa laeatad -Ithin tha City of Or>no (hatainaftar -City*) and lafally daacrlbad aa Mt block 1* To«ran9#au Additionia * a wmiat, tha applicant haa applied to tha City of OMM for a Conditional Uaa Parnit to parait a ehanqa in ttaa frea tha axiatiaf qa* atation/tranaataaion repair* a laqal non-eanforainf aaa to a baaa nalaa/nautical ahop with no boat rapalra on aita* eaaaidarad a lasa intanaa comaareial uaa af tha raaidantlal preparty par tha diraatlaaa of Section 10.03 Subdiviaion S (J) and Oreno Maalatiaa tMl* XtOB f of Section XXX of that haoalutlen which atatae aa fallaaai •• f *€. Other oaaa aay be conaidarad by tha Ceanail upon appliaatiaa and upon a flndinq ihat tha prepaaad uaa la laaa nan*eonfaralaf than tha aboua paraittad uaaa." • Minnaaota t wem, nnapoM* as xr naoLm by tha city Council of Oroaa* pxaDxm 1. ?hla application wa* rawiawad aa Soninp Flla 91112. 2. Tha property la located in tha LH*1A* Lakaahera Xaaldantlal Zoning District. 3. On Hay It* 1917* tha Orone Planning Coulaalen raalawad tha application aa propoaad and raeeaaandad approval baaad an tha followinq findingai ^ rr,^ a) Tha propoaad uaa eraataa laaa doaanda on tha Bauaraly liaitad aita. b) Tha aatarnal appaaranca and prinolpal vaa of tha proparty la awra eoapatibla with aurroundlnf raaidantlal nalfhbarhoad and aalatlnf lagal lahaahora eoanaralal udaa of adjaaaat V ■arina. c) Adjacent naighbara have bean notified of tha prepaaod change in uaa and naaa haaa auhaittad vrlttan abjaotlano* Page 1 af 9 i* #‘ f D *1/ . • .■ • %i- •' f City of ORONO Hl»WUTlON Of THt CITY COUNCIC ^ 219J ;i. r SfSS £i“ •”•xe«atlv* atorav* b®«t« aiiowM in • ) Th« approvnd aita P^*"ei^hting dlatanca at tha adjaeaat tntaraaoti^ t\ Th« Dropoaad uao and concorraat Jiv.”%Xmy. .ff.« on th. .«.»»* t roaldaneaa. 4 Tho City Council haa conaldarad thla ;PJii?2*?J2irSSJ tha findlnqa and coaawinityo a Tha City Council flnda that frantihf f C— UrKiJ to fl l5. . «»«t; 1" «»• ”AV «*%•»! bo-lth, oofoty •' iiJTolo of iff *»•«»* »r otk«r Zoninq Coda^and Coiaprahanalva Plan of tho City. coocLoszon* oRon w» ujwiimw ■o.«l opon 0.0 or i~t. of tho obwo .VSiS^S Council boroby tt*"to • orb«ff»o»^ ***‘ *® :ic‘uTc.- .irAff/V-rVoVroroi *.5;rp r.iXJ't.'ffi' i;A?r “oV^".«r .r followlnq itamai :-.'.”t'A*v„ riV;:% si-iUa-ii «F“ffS“iSHrr? County Mlqlway oapartnant and City. Paqa 2 of 9 * 5 .nv: »•• ' '" • ' • -f'»« A*/r. ••. •** City of ORONORtSOUUTlON or THf CITY COUNCIL Mn 2193_________D V •-» !•* 1 b) Landic«p« Improvemant* •• followii A ^ ^ - . ^ • ..:r • /=» jI*-* j liC « ^ f*' ' i 1, Th. .Id. y.ra .dl.c..t to 1»V fllSStM^iSl -'.'."J? S.’ti«2«“ V „ L- • -,- M 21 No Dlantlno* within County buffor oroa adjacont to Spatoo Drlwa. . .-• •s -^k- 3) Connaet privacy fanctlot lino alon9 northaaat portion of.piotioi^y i!« ..t.nd f.nc. to Sp.t.. A«««.. .) Api>llc.nt to wt*natural acroonlng adjacent to list otouaw^^^^^ rt^gj* rear yard green. _ e) xnetallation of approved parking paacenger vehicle parking etalle *®^ ^ ;•• followat ' • f 1) spacer I through 4 2 iMtalloS?^*exeeea of 25 feat - no maati to bo inotaiioa. . 2) Spacea 5 through 7 ^axeeaa of 20 feet - no aaata to bo Inatallod. ; d) Xeooval of underground gaa tanka par ih'ST;",:io.?-;uuT^S"JrS.sa2 Porwit fro« City required. ^ ;y^n dfj ‘ '3 <■' ^ • U<^ .) .WOY.1 of poop ioloud. frmit tto« Mty po^t^.v;;s^>^ 1. A olnol. .cc... .h.ll ..t». «>•ehall wake the final detarailnatlon regarding tho 1 ^ acceae. ':'■’ 3. Signage to be Halted •*J*J^;?JiVi^UU*ViVo‘lU?5lt84ehall be ehielded froa all lot linaa poa . Iljnage on eaet aide of building. ' 4. The change in uee will not Jjf W't-'V'x! ■win __ PmWn ^ • 0 ^ ■ ' t City of ORONORESOUUTION 0^ THf CITY COUNCIL NO. D V. I 2193 jL 4 I -■f K V K: b) Landte«p« Improvwwnta a« foUowii ^ 1) Th. .la. y.ra .aj.e.nt to 1»V s-'t'o*'?? Ro’tVtV.;.' i:*»« 2) MO plantings within County right-of-i»ay «» t”f? buffar araa adjacant to Spaton AYonno Driva. . 3) Connaet privacy fanca tolot lina along northaaat portion of ■.pi0|iairty ^ lit entand fane, to Spataa Avanua. ■ 4) Applicant to work with City 5P|. natural acraaning adjacant to lift raar yard graan. . ' ■ c) Xnatanation of •PP'®r»^fVi ‘?aSj51iSS!2t^ pasaangar vahicla parking atalla ^ followat ‘ r 1) Spacaa 1 through 4 1 ini tad to axcaaa of 25 faat - no maata to bo Inatallad. 2) spacaa 5 through 7 ^•K^illJd!*-T axeaaa of 20 faat - no maata to bo inataiiao. . • d) Mamoval of undarground gaa tanka par Fira Coda and undarground •?JJ.^n raoair opO«IS«atora oil* ate., waataa from tranamiaaion rapaar Permit from City raquirad. ^ e) Ranoval of pump iala.id. Parmit from City ra^i^t^• ) iRMioval of pump itlajd* Pormlk fro® ci y ^ 2 A Single access sha 11 sarva tha P'®^**A'?iT i^tioA^f^tbo shall maka tha final datarmination ragarding tha XocaUoii, _ _ _ _— maceass. 3. Signaga to ba limitad to axiating shall bi shialdad from all lot llnaa - post fira lano^wx^ li^ga on aaat aids of building. ^ 4 Tha ehanga in usa will not raguira JJf ^*^Sr* eiainst tha P^YA7t^S4®ful'?Tarvioa*a]^an;jr;r5a%^^a *iv ^ ?i.”aU:*iss•that tSm dafarrad aaaaaamant will ba apraai owar ana a of tima aa all othar unita*. •’ : -t-; -nv •s.*• *>i*r ' V-i*»* f kTww» 4 t I * W •6rc ^q% City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 21^3_________ D ..3s‘I^ i.- «k -• S. Authorltl«« granted by this eoadltioaal uaa panit xoa'vltb the propart/ aot with tha applicant* but ara paraiaalva anly.aad . auat ba aiareiaad by application (or a pamit within ana yaar of tha data e( Council approval* or thia conditional uaa pacait will aapira on that data (Juno 8* 1988). §• Violation of or nen-coaplianco with any of tha tans nnd conditlona of thia roaolution ahall conatituta a violation of'tha toning Coda* ahall autoaatically taminata any authority grantad harain* and ahall ba punishable aa a niadaaaanor. ■ • v.* 7* Tha undaraignad owaar haa road* undaratood and haraby agraaa to tha tama of this raaolution and on bahalf of hinaalf»;iliia hairs, sttccasaors and assigns* haraby agraaa to tha raeording of this resolution in the chain of title of tha proparty. ’ : S Adopted by tha Orono City Council on this Ith day of Jana* 1987. -b'.-w-;• I •• t i i Jorothy jr^lallin* City Clark J ^/y?y7W'%5 iX) Pro^rty Om«r “ f • ^ n % ^ ** • ■ *> r { i J . •.wI •1 '..n.'. »• • U‘:f - ' • ■ ?•r. " ■■jktf.'.v-’*. » »> Paga 4 of S " ■' '-i F.v r .7. *^ ,*<1 CITY *1i I|aRaPK^ CITY of ORONO Post Office Bos 65•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553Z3• Municipal OflScea On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 10, 1988 Gerald E. Toberman Shelard Tower, Suite 1460 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Re: Resolution #2193 -/1960jShoreline Drive Resolution #2194 - Shoreline Drive Dear Mr. Toberman; In regard to your request to extend the expiration dates of the original land use applications approved for 1955 and 1960 Shoreline Drive, the ordinances' of the City do not provide the City Council with the authority to extend the expiration dates for an undefined/limitless time period. The ordinance does allow the City Council to extend an expiration date if an applicant requests so in writing prior to the expiration of the variance or conditional use permit approval, but only if that applicant can confirm to the City that the approved use would begin within a short or reasonable period of time. It would appear that the proposed uses of 1955 and 1960 Shoreline Drive will not be realized for another six months to a year. You may apply for a simple renewal variance applicacion for 1955 Shoreline Drive at a half price of the original application and as long as no changes are proposed from the original plans, the application may be scheduled before both the Planning Commission and Council as a consent item requiring no discussion. In the case of 1960 Shoreline Drive, you may also apply for renewal of the conditional use permit but note that the use as approved under the original conditional use permit (Resolution #2193) allowed only a legal non-conforming use for a boat sales/nautical shop. If you propose another use, this would require a separate conditional use permit review. You should also be advised that a renewal conditional use permit for the boat sales/nautical shop would also be just a half price of the original application fee and if no changes are proposed, this would also be scheduled as a consent item on the Planning Commission and Council agendas. cOING 4 ZONING - 473-7337 \S5ESSINC ADMINISTRATION 4 FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 I Gerald E. ToberriM Re: Resolution #2193 Resolution #2194 November 10, 1988 Page 2 of 2 1960 Shoreline Drive 1955 Shoreline Drive Please let me know if you have any questions concerning the matter discussed above or if I can be of any assistance in your efforts to achieve approved uses and improvements of these unique properties. Sincerely, ^UU)/U C JAM/tin Enclosure cc Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Doning Administrator ; woc'dy Dove, Smith's Bay Yacht Club, 1955 Shoreline Dr, Wayzata, 55391 Yen. Larson, Smith's Bay Yacht Club ILl f* '.yr • • A.** « *na'«. *• *'•• ■ %<• • 1. Vu • -* ^ w- 'i^'7 '-V& I '' ■*i--*V* V.m fOi mtk B«rfilMrtf•«•, city AdiUiilatntor % ‘ VMBi J»tai R. Oarhardam, Rublie Norka M««i Juna a, ifi7 • Coanty M. is-tpataa Rv«. ^ l^aday* Jmia a* lft7« t Mt with rapraaaRtatAvaa of BaaMaia ■ ‘ *!!? ot a craaaw a lR i« tR« S2E3 m>u <•of fherallao Driwa (Cooaty Rd. IS) and fpataa Aoa. Mr. Ma^ Wat a oawto, Traffic Inylnaar for fftimiRln enoMv. ataa^ ‘r?i** • *«••«»» ‘»tMt Tss^i . .y ii#09SSAry 010110000 20 iiA 00A iRltlally atrlpo tha oroddBolk dM fdfdA* « v'.' ■■■ . - 4 , M^Vaj V It la^tonaapln Ceuaty'a polloy to deal vltli d'MRidiBalAR^Ml^^^S^^ and not a prlwato property ewiiir. ^ • .'%> .. *. . ma >'* ^ «., * a. 41 Ml * * •: V/..--: -•. -f r,’ !nT.*-..:^^*v‘Tnaca ••i •% *'v-y •■ • s.'V : w. vr,.\ •-*••• » •iy-Vv".’? ■ ••- •• • y \ . ■•' ■..;..-Sm - • • ;,. —’.>,V i Wf TVA 5 n\A*N. O.A o rr.- c £'C^ !0o ! 'Bath 4 \ I. i |i^?4\cKS JTu« ; (J»; r rf*»»s, C*KA/e # SfjA,««4 % -f- Hi <t> /K1 A \ \r 5' Aac.)4S5M.rrt i>\^ C! T) 5Pc.^| ^.S>■I.^O^ ita^n^ (4ATl.^ CflAr T^ 4f ' 'J’.4.»>4* S- ;?9' L~rr-i- \ , #1 I #I «» H r ^ '• j ■ U^^^fl^iPWWHUiUUU'J '.•.I' CITY 1D 1335 Brc! r Crystal E! (612) 475r35 ORONO n Flj South • P O Bo* 56 V, f. rnascta 55323 PERMIT X. PERMIT TYPE; SITE ADDi ^EJS:15*£.0 SHOi^SLINt OR ^ T M • to-1 t 7-'"- -d **—yt *'*' DESCRIPTION: VT.J "V rt.QMi CATSl sw. •XJ.♦»jyor CratMli Urono CuwAcll I^Bbara IliSJIlSf 5**f***»* Ch«lr«aR «*lUy '‘ity Adalntatrator BarnharJaon Jaann. h, MatMiati)« SoaU, MminUtrMt >**rcfc IX, Xtt7 l"V,r Orlv* - Orono, an anthorlaad aaant *** CAtf %t p.«i.. i... » Urt WMitmt,*-*** ' *“•*•* ••MIvIMm $ (*», Id, Ml, , * “ ApplicatXmt J * Uat ; *c - rxat Map • ' ■ * troparty Ownara - '■ - Cartlfieata of Nalllnf 9 - tenolutlon Mo. m C - MoolutXon Ho. 1)«4 ! I ‘ 'Alo #742 2 : •“*«“ ^ IjyiS.-*5S32.:!2* ‘••-i •. .uj*jur.u\iW.vS!v^ %i:»!ixtutu or .M Ut.r.ctl<». oil bo ;»,ViJS***““ *'*’• ** ****j5iri “IS J2w:“l*?si,s5 ’;’zr 2ltSVun “?afiJI.* •«o«rpta froo tho ntoCf vm - { . t f O.J • r j n i*» • t n.*•t 11.S'%*•tory of Proporty1 •tor to 1«T(|. th« Mttarly 70 foo*-. of tho proporty ionod t«l - - City roienod tho l-l portion of tho proporty t# M-U UTIo¥and concurront with thot roteninf odopto4 aoooivtioo IMl fnalMt <•—tnMloMnp • lawful non-eonforoinf eoMorelol ***** ■••*•*•**?r.'nfhfi pnp^ftf. Th# MrvlM itatlofi/^if fvpsir ••• in cno for* or onothor up to l#t3 whon Craif ••• f»****^^ rcndltional uoo pondt for tho addition of troMBiMlo* np*i* W*» ■ ** intoot of PopolutioB IMl • PM-Conforoiof Om ftMliriai •* Tho rooolutiofi ootobllihlhf tho lofol proporty opoclfleolly opollod out llnlto and fuldolino* tfc* •larwleo ototlMi uoo but Itoo t of Motion XV of tlM% follewln^t ,-r ^ 3 *C. Othor usao ooy bo eonoldarad by tho Oeonoil upon a flndlnf that tho propoood uaa la loot ... , —:-—,ta abowa porolttad uoao.* f This ooctlon hoa boon tho boala for alailXoff ifpllMtlOM %lMt . ■ » ^4;^ chanoo tho approwod uoo to anothor eeonarelal or'AOO^ooofoasiod foul rahllnt a provloua applicant* ooupbt to ro loot to bio kbit ObM^. eparatlon to tho oubjaet proporty and Mlntoia tbo foo #oXOM_*fco^| application waa donlad* otaff haa anoloaad a copy of ttet^NOOiotiM OOtti^Jlg tha flndlnyo for donlal (Bahlblt C). In 19*3* Council frantad a eonditlunal uoo permit to Ctoif allow tbo uoo to axpand to llaUtad traaaaloolao ropaif OOO* Moioo MMMt R* tho rooolutlon that llata tho roqulrod fladiaoo for opppQiyl intanalflcatlon of tho non-conforminf uaa* II10 limitof ttOMlMlM Vtpoif uaa waa doamod eompatlbla with aarwio* atatloo uaa that iMm Olwyo omiot^ on tho proporty. Noto that Counoll a loo roopoodod tO OOOmMttd praoauroa brought on by tho ell orunoh durinf that pofiod of ^^*a far 0^ indepondant aaall oparatera. Another bif factor maa ttet .tto aaifaiaiaaai wanted tha oarwlca atatlon uaa to raomln* ' T/' - * #« rtl« lUU•Maiw'i I I, lJg7i**l*K* t *«1>.. M 14*. i^rtSi\!SS»^t nmUtShJSSi •ubaitt«4 m •k«tefe «f tM »r#»*««4 te m&t •PPlicooto tlidt tVoy%rSloX^fi'L^* M^SSlir 22 :in s«.5proportloo. AltiMooii otoff *»- i*?--- ^ totol pro»ooo4 ooo of %Ao sij Si ssSu^~ contiouott* porklAf lot propotld^ tor^ iSta ,VMO',„ ___ cu.to.or parking for oi^lo. 22d .«v1m ...king tho City, input boforo d.aigning ploiJ"*** ^ •tomUro. A-I Md*Vi\l*^iL2 Mi!t««.. p».^«r*^VU.i%??A?/U‘-4;jSi2,’SJr* J 11 to for Ploooiag ••loo to uoo * *«tolutlon •f41, io koot ooloo tlklo wltll «•• - dlscourag. crc.ing ov.r City rood. * ^ammUl «ock C. Bow ____ rosoning proportyiTiirVy\;“r,*j,*,v«Vi*.iV5u *«*^»**» 3* «•• hittory of proportyt ?’ B?! diroctivo of Suction 10.oS! aubdivi3. Oiroctiv. of Roaolution lt€l. f. ••• 9 Uli » .A. ^NisH or EXCEWPT8 r.o. arorr memo ron Ws0^'- m- i*Ur. .-.ji'Xii Vv'v**^ ^ < a» • f fill*r ki * h I I , l^i7 • I 'K’ 4 vf( •V * uod«rst«ndlnf that tiM o«n«c ot Bmith Bay NarlM Baa ala« BwcalMaai oparatioa - thla alioald ba aada claar. —•»»*«» aa a zt u ataffa pealtioa tBat tha .2« aera aita la taa iladtad ta dual oparaclaa. Tha Beat aalaa oparatiaa waald Bava laaa of ao oparatioa. Tha atorapa af boata avaa for a lloltad aarlTS *«*^*^** craata aajor proBlaoa for tBla aa< • aatalllta oparatioa or a a facllicy for tha MaMall Bay oparatlou, thara aay Ba otBar laaoaotlt to doal with tha alta. Baoaabar tha parking lot to tBa aortB oav *’**ll**d 1£ Council alao danias tha parking lat aoaBdoaat* Ba tBa pro^r^V. *^''^"*‘** *'*• cannot eroata a -naw* aaa-aoafaralag m with tha abaaaoa af aupport aatarlal froo tha agaata wBo alaa to loaaa tBa proparty, tha City ataff would atlll raeoaaand approwal af a alagalar (praforably boat aalaa) uaa or a aupport aatalllta oparatioa of tBa rt »¥»Bo oa a 1 Blto Plaa • ^ Tarkinq Maada. Area Of atructuro 1170 a.f. 1) Par B-2 atandarda <Sactlon 10.41 iubdlvlalaa SB) • atalla raqulrad ^-.v, • ’i fiJbllahlSntr iMbdlvialon 10 0 - Batall Balaa aad toroloa f pet 150 a.f. of not floor araa ■1170 — ISO - 7.0 or t atalla Thara la no apoolflo atandard for a raaldaatlal dlatrlet foga^laa couarelal uaoa - ataff racoaaanda ualng tBa ataadar4*^^ ,tBa prlnolpa. uaa (aalaa and aarvlea oantar). So thla apaolfio oaaa. • would alao ba raqulrad for ooooaralal/ratail aaa ^tilTht B-a ^4-: ^ ‘ ^ ' V t V.. . • ,1 • *» - . I .1i i 14. ; /• *>lonti (Uli««hor«J.leUl).•oon •• current o«««r Brovld«a a taanwrZTtrv.T*^** f**^**^^ •• laadtcapinf and aita ia»ravaMata wrriMid^J lifr§uItlIS. *•* **“^4) tl«nata and UfhtUf Hava aot baaa aHam. ' VV::i * ••«tiaa lO.ll aubdiviaiaa a - Slaaam ^yaaaat---- *********** •”*•* “ ? - Ulk«» c«aut Ikla. *•«puHlia raada aar adjaaaat raaidaatui lata. * ■ *-*r..‘“/j:^**‘**-«?*««? »•— «« J5!k*5?sii:'J!*i*}*i5 “ "*• s »u ^S!!.A**«4* »“«• •«PP®»t*4 an aadlaaa varlaty~af"dlalMTCS?pi»,iM'i*,^vij?*"ei{;*ij«iv*.*. uf'*:sjtsr *** :?;iiyu'.**/*A‘i,,»», «:.w-ifs'a^Xd eooault with aitlldliif OapartWat "a cU..lflcatlaa aad. If raqaTriTaa -wradUToflSjSi;?^ coBaaet ta raatataal^trrwapprc^iata SAC payaaat vltli parait. • raMvad par ataadarda af Oalfa?Pira * ataff wauld flad tha baat aalaa ar ___ aai«iy—^p if baat rapalra ara eoaductad voaXd aapport thla paaitlaa with tha faUaalaf wUliISri ^ li Tha uaa vaald eraata Xaaa daaaada aa tha MTWly Uiitai a^^m^ •PP^n^nnca and aaaoolatad vaaa aitli tba ^laaiM^nBSi^ Muld IM Mra coapatabla with aurrauiidtaf : s?c«V ’*j.ri*'‘ ******. .. •“*^'®nndiB9 ptaparty awaara vaald annpon ^"lai "*^**^**^^®* “•• •• laap as boata ara aat atavad aa tlM X a A z^<m ». Mmln, CoMlniM ,i,h „ ^ «—tH iMn^ CMCnlD, ,tl«t i,, if b„t „„i, i, ««i4U!?JSf ,i5j?S _______________ ' . '.t.jn.a.v'i a*jJfcSs aa. r^,r-* a ^ • • *i'. ‘■•‘V ♦« * -• 1*' ’•• \ • ► i’*AI^-. *.•♦'\- sofiifif rii« nus Mr«li u* 19t7 p»f« • ,V.' n / *v l' • th* •ppUmnt •rt^tliif twiidjd llfUtlllft •if**f« •»* • ••• ••••'•» / »•# ' •-y.:V«VV; •MliMBt alM«U W a4vit«« that ^ ititT a«ttar «f arailt) to aaaara tha tfaaal af %>a,aM a all tha •wwtioa aC a paraaaaat taa aaaat taaka __ _ aaiatlaf aaaar llaa ?-i ‘ ■« 1' ■ J‘ 5 <lf>t',•*. ' rV.i. .-'M r**--: •4't' • vnV.*' VAnJ-i *.- !V-i >f V ** ' ’ r. *1 . \ ,i*. <-% .»».•• - •* K••T" y}.j t>u% rig 1 «}■ -. |||i 'I'rtf/ f, <f*.’ ^■'^r;':--:--r •; mm mmsmmum August 30, 1988 City of Orno OrOQO, Minnesota Attention: Jeanne Habusth Dear Ms, Mabusth: for the property at 1960 Shoreline Drive or for a suitable ' tenant to lease Che property. ^ yet we have not been successful in doing either. We would like to maKe a request to continue the variance for this property With respect to the property at 1955 Shoreline Drive, we have completing our developers agreement on a daily basis but we might not get the building built until Spring. If you have any questions, please call me. Yours truly. GET:b Gerald £• Toberman Smith s Bay Yacht Club 1955 Shoreline Drive Wayzata. MN 55391 A Distinctive New Dimension 7b Sailing Facilities 612/474-2534 7 I I LI * r “JMI ,. • '»» « "N cxj ;!r'!T RESOLUTION NO. fA/ 5^*^ A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A CONOIIIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A UWFUL-NONCONFORMINC USE OP LAND TOiclpal corporakon the State of Minnesota; and ^ique characteristic, and constraints affectlng^elSJiL5 the City and which Plan establishes goals and guiding prinelDles fbr planning and reviewing aevelopnent within the City; and ^ Council has adopted a Zoning Code •tandards and crlterU &r lapleae^tloa of the guiding principles of the Comprehensive Guide Plea; end WHEREAS, the Zoning Code of the dty provides for rha Mntlnuing use of land or buildings as lawful non-conformlna uses j^enever s^ uses were lawful uses under prior sonlna ««« WHEREAS, the property described below has becoBt a lawful non-con£or»ln* u.. o£ land and bulldln,, 1„ th. -nnar^cJlbS^.; Cltv of RESOLVED, that the City Council of theCity of Oroio hereby establishes a Conditional Use Pe»ltf« ooor JSL cwdltlws;° following described property according to the following I.Property Description ^ 24, 25 and 26. "Ora Minnetonka and that part of Street lying cxtentlons of aide lines of said Lota 24 25^ Addition!^^*'*' Intended to be replatted as Lot 2, Tmra^eau 2. Lot size: («ve.) 145.58 ft. wide by (ave.) 73.55 ft. deep - 11,A35 sq.ft. (.26 acre). if ^ ■* ♦ITT Ilf \\Wm Tm* ' P> •» ‘ ** •^9 i-i Resolucion Mo. Page 2 L * rground fuel storage tanks: one fuel puap lelend wlch four pto^s; one advertising sign base; concrete drlvea over fuel tanks and at puicp island, gravel surface elsewhere. 4. Bslstlng Omership: Land owned In fee by Harriet TourangMu; part of the land leased to Robert Reutlau since 1954. Reutlaan owns the building. Reutlmaa'e Interests sub*leased to Texaco, Inc., in 1963 which iaasee s use ceased on or about Septe^er 23, 1978. II. Existing Use 1. Since 1963, Texaco, Inc. has subleased station to one ®** operators who have used the property for retail gasoline and notor fuel sales, light repalr^aad —— - ®* parts in notor vehicles. Vehicle service Included tune-ups, lubrication, tire repair, repiacMmc of exhaust systens, engine parts, etc. Sal%j ^n^.xuded gasoline of various grades, tires, batteries, additives, and parts when installed In the vehicles. . «« pares included vending nachlne sale of, ' ‘soft drinks and cigarettes. 1 • »>» • • ••3. Recent year's use has included hours of operation ge^rally running from 6 or 7 A.M. to 6 or 7 P.M. weekdays rechiced operation Saturdays and no operation on Sundays. * 4. Recent year’s use has NOT included bulk fuel sales. Ursa repairs, auto body repairs, welding, recall or %rtiolesale auto parts sales, retail or wholesale sales of any other conodity except as noted above, or outside storage of parts, equipaent or trucks. i e /■ ' • * s.^V A ' ;* n • ^ ^ •<• ? ■3’'■; Re»olutlon Kb. P«*e 3 Uj I •' ZXZ. Zoning -=a- •eand«d*! ^ con£on«nc« to «mlag p«r£on*ac. f* ''•* plannod to b«’chongod from ■-! tn i avith .a«p.i«., 2: S.Si^ nd ^loMototlon of the Comprehensive Guide FUn. ^ IV. Conditions! Use Permit for Continued Use iezoSii condition of the zoning cod. .nd .ccordlng to S.‘2oSu2L ‘^,?*ii?Si“i.S:. »nn<r .nd «t«,c of th. «,. ,h,u b. .. pr«lo«.ly 4. The prlnel^I business shell be retell motor fuel aai.. buslnee. may inclilde other existing uses In Section II Abov6» wsl -5 V^ ^e^olutloA No. page 4 L- IV. Conditional Use Pemit for Continued Use (Cone.) leaa non-confonelng than the above permitted uaea. t^ Included In this permit ia authority for between the hotirs of 6 A.H. and 10 p.M, daily including Sundays and Holldaya. »«*ay k> iMtilUelon of oo. nw 6,000 toUon undorfnnad otoron tanks, subject to building permit, •wrege c) Installation of new or r .vi^ed puB^ ialanda end fuel P«BP». iubject to building parirlt. And/or exterior renovation and remodeling of required by thia permit 4a a condition to authoriaed operation are the following: “»* t, b. co^>t.t,dut« of fTOcln, r«iulr«l by Swcloa M.SOl of Sly n*!*?*!^ '■* »•'« ‘•‘M ^ of rear station window with masonry (per State occupancy?*’^*^ * *** completed prior to building d) IssMnce of Certificate of Occupancy by the xonine department prior to opening for business. • a • • -- , ;• • • -Wi • 4b4ss.Vr> .-_ _^ ♦ • ’ • ■ * • f •• -- \ *«* w^a»i^*l*****^"“*““^'Jiastsi! Resolution No* fag* 5 • ^ 9 TMs pcrsit If fubject to revifw by City Oounell violation of th« condltiona fat hof in or *f ^l^ad by Section 32.490 of the soning code. Adopt.^ b, t». Cltr C^cll of^th. ClJfjO* Orooo .t ireeting on the /K------ot gi-dr ■ —» • V. ^v«e r», V . X ,:»r? .*:>•»> \-•v•*^ V*;,* ,> Hillie. 1. van Neft. «yS_ «%•*.•• • •*.-• . ' '• .»• • -n xTiii: ................ A. ATTESr: Walter R. Benson, Clerk/Admlnlstretor • • r .. . •r — ...f -- V : -r. *%•». ^ . . • - -V- a . .r .. • • *•« - n«r o • k »n » < f- . r-tv—* • • • -«•.. •« •• . - Tvt . . , ‘X* ‘. »>.-1 - • •..; »,*»••»••• • ' > • •• • •• • ^ ' W ■Vv> % * • ••• »__ • * -..t- f« I * • * ' • ■ ''1.'.‘■' 'i-V- ? *• * • -..V * T . * ', ■ ^‘ . A** 4 • • * •• •*r-» * -r. ,*• 4* -4 • • • nt .‘• w 1 f ) •X i Ka •Vi ^ ol fS- If *>.• t « 1 */47o- Bonestroo Rosaie Anderiik & Associates Engineers & Architects M Ono a tpr^esBPO itaoen vir tnvne ^ imeah C Pf ( Vnfr W C Olwn ^ Oinn t CMfe ^ f Pf «o»e*t 0 khi#ichi Pf MerMT L lBn«w Pf mm P iMBn Pf *KM« W PE OMf C ftppML Pf jm^ A tM»« pf H P<ilf pf Mrhwi ^ Pf Uwn « PMne Pf OMO UWOU Pf «r mmnan Pf C Pf mm 0 WMR pf JlPin t MiiM Af T'Aomti t AfSMon. A1 A p Ar^prwn Pf dm f ayiMv pf MMff M Pf M«Bt mnmry. pf (awe ajMNi 4IA W Ah«|g Qimi It ^ T^aMf Ar^ Pf C*'jnR 4 fndaoh mrnm A utmm pe ICC M PiiUMli Qomit i gdynarv Pf Hantr M Onon A ftiB Af llrtinM Bwrfn CAA J CjPMVt pf November 10, 1939 Citj of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay. MH 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re I 1960 Shoreline Drive (Dave Carlson) Our Pile No. 139-1472 Dear Jeanne: We h*ve reviewed the site of 1960 Shoreline Drive. We would recommend thit the fence be repeired end the medien area be filled witn rock at plaxined. We would also recomend that care of the median area (plantine's. etc) be addretted. It it currently rather unsightly. If you have any questions please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, 4NDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRCxdh LB/28 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Tb> Mayor Grabak & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairxaan Kelley Orono Planning Ccxnmission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Frais Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building t Zoning Administrator Dates November 13» 1909 Subjects Tabling of Application #1473 List of Bzbibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Hardcover Fact Sheet Survey Site Plan City Attorney Letter Mabusth Letter Written Notice to Affected Property 0«#nera The above referenced application has been tabled and the public hearing will be rescheduled for the January 1€» 1990. Although staff has taken several photopraphs of this property, we ask that Planning Commission members make a visual inspection at the time November land use applications are being reviewed. The after-the-fact/violation portion of the property involves the construction of the lakeshore deck without the benefit of building permits or zoning approval. Upon a site inspection, please note several areas with landscaping and plastic underliner and the dimensions of deck in relation to what is shown on the survey/site plan and what actually exists on the property. Staff has asked for an amended survey and amended hardcover facts for the January meeting. Please advise staff if Planning Commission members seek additional information in the continued review of this application. _ r * •'f T •j HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHET*'"^’' SHT3ACK ZCN£: (CIRCLE CNE) 0 E-xisting Hardcover in Zone WORKSHEftii^1.4:13^ A. H ouse .15-0'X ^6-6' .\^ovz^ X.,. n^ LENGTH WIDTH ....32.' ,71 . 2- ' .S70.4 d> X m S.P. X S.P. X m S.P. B. Garage _2D.5' ^2.2_ . \ ’ .- X.F. CS) c. D riveway nl ^ -H40* ,.c. X S.P. D. Sidewalk 3.S ISS.S'^x.F. ® 5 > S.F. ® 14^ X.5t-5 .5M 1. ?ATIO/ D eck . - t- X .R.P. ® f.Landscape 63 X 4.6 ^3S.5- x.x. ® AREAS __ UNDERLAIN BY 61 X 3.\rz-^ x.F.00) PLASTIC SHEETING X S.P. X S. F." . Other X m S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone " r' Total P roperty Arm :n .one 534'4 .(34 i 5344^s.f. [a ] I%TS~7-.38s.f. [b B 100 - 'ZIM- % • r T' * 1;4ARi:C0V£.^ CALCULATICff WORKSHEEi ^ SET3ACX ZONE: (cii^cLE cne) Q~73'25Q-^0' 50Q-1CCQ Existing Ha.^dcoves in Zone iiW A. House •Z-S.o w w V M LENGTH s. Garage ^ ^ c. DaivTHAy D. Sidewalk 4S E. Patio/ Deck 4 F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN / i BY ■ ^ * PLASTIC SHEETING 6. Other sI . X X X X % X X X . X , X X X X X X . X . Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone WIDTH , '2.1, Z .£>70.^'*' « m • m ■ 22., 1 .452.o*^ Sn s 3-£ 3 . ._ _ .. ....... S 4,5 2as.6'l Z-122.'^, ai s a s _ s. S.F.© SP. S.F. S.F. S.F. \ S. r • S S.F, .’d) .r.(5> D2riO (t^ Kc\L? 53Z.6.4- s<F. 0 i3+2 sli6s.f. rn 55ZS.4 .im i‘?.7gi.Vc , 100 - zti3_L_% I , *.. ‘ :«- • • V POPMAM. H a IK, SCHNOBAICM 4 Ka UFMAN^ LTO JJOO ^AF»^RAr ^OWC^ MINN£APOLia. MIHNSSOTA WM.TKMCAO •PMCg •» W< L«.t« A rnmmwfn m. »»AC01R€R •*«»• A. uCC & R mCC at rRCCOiA W4«wC AIU.CT-C MiCmACW ▼. i»>W^ Tfn^aiuMI •». MBRCRT e. MOtUAMCA TMCMAAA P. nCUAOM TM«MA« ^ IBMA«0 •MVIP ti« MA«MMA4.k T44APmA»« eis a3»>paoo rCUKCOP«CR t J3i <aat •ia-33A*a'T«i Oil c j-a^ a«o3 A PVP« ("wAi* V. R wmmactt , ill pR»CR*e« e RM«p« TwA >Mi« ic mini wAMCA A OAUCA OCrriBCT A MAi^RKAM AIBUAC A MAAJ14RSAM UAMCA A RTCt4.C« •lAMCA A LOCMMAirr AlU»4M VM. H iMOCRAACJI C.iPPORO •«. ARCCNC A WMUVIAM fCAUPMAM raa ^w ’'•era MiCMACw a rfkCCMAm »0«MMI0 SAM MTCRA lit UMiAT A 4SPC^ «AMI4 A MArenOM TMAMAS RAARerr WAMCR a . aavn C ila TmwSC a m. ma AT im c. &M.^aA MwAkAS • SCA^n TmA ma A a A aa »m4R AiCiAikAft A KAA^ik AAwCC A msA marrears Acorr A RtCNTrA PAU^ LiMS1*PAiri>i •CO^r A SM<^ •AlAA A. ^A ma AAN AASO^rr A. PVW.4R ^ BA ^«rts SAM a CT a AOAA* A avi A M. ATfNawa ftAAPV A. SAwdpMtTM OiPa AR a mim*4» CLiZARC^A A. KCiTN A AAkAtUAMp ma A« a PCTCPPA m VyiT« RAAO <aM »cvrKTCAwrw rrsecr CCNVCR COLORADO m0909 rcwtPAOAS SAJ*#aaa*<4PP Tcccccp AP RAa-pps-a ipA •UlTR ICO OOs^M iOoo M sTPcrr. M. A WA8H1NOTON, O. C. 20038 rr«CRMCiiiC too 02•-taco Tr^ceoPiCR aoi-ojo-fti.o OIRCCT OtAL NUMaSR ’’•MOTaar ml ^wC a ORwOO A. PCrcROCM R^rta A m«CAC«OSM •amaa SCrr4AAA«« tMOMAO C. MtAk.CNMAuSAN MiCMACL A CNR«OrCMOOM Ww m Omao ^ OC ama RTS WftrPPCT A CAiRNO Oi^rM U a*AAR kOirtO lA ROraaAN ▼OOP M vOMMtOOR kOWlS * SMSTM ORwes *<. w-r-**.* a*AR« r RA%MA •'•RPCW* A RORCOOA • RVAR k. OR aa POmO mattmcw a AAMOM wCMM M PROVO *41.^ I. PRIC9CRO PRUW A ^Om4S A'k.iAaa a. ». •r^o FW4M<RO>MO%r4 ocroram a . avcoM ac*«aoM A wMiTRCv AATiaRTai «•» MA%AC« OrCROC jk OOCMA OMAMC A «S4U^ MAPS r TOM cron OUAWC A MOCCRCR R«r ROMP OARy R PORP4k,« WOMN M. OAMCR ha RC n a HAMOCN ■ wSRAR •ACt'OMARl^C OTCVCN A RMlLkiPO W4NOA A PRICOMCR arorom a rarror VOy A NA4.0CPA P^ATRlOiA A. OXCAPy KARCR R CO lC (<12) 334-2687 ORCPORy A SROOMCR • RIAN «r Oam ORCaOP* *. tCOTT rooarrc a. :LAtocRACo<R CCC^L.A M MiCHtL •OOCRT C. CAOTUK •F eRURRA. PRCR M MORRISON wuOiTia yRvNOCR A lM«rii —III a >»^<i iNCLUQtPO TNC rORMCR UMP PIPW OP 4 OPoC r Nov«mbrr 9, 1989 BY MESSENGER i; Dennis B. Johnson, Esq. Stuset C. Beer, Esq. CHESTNOT ft BROOFS 3700 Piper Jeffrey Tower 222 south Ninth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 \ . Re: James Klein/2056 Shady Wood Road Gentlemen: Today, Z received a telephone call from the Orono City Inspector informing me that your client, James Klein is continuing to construct a deck at the above address despite the stop-work order, the need for a variance and the citations which have already been issued to your client. The purpose of this letter is to request that you immediately contact your client and have him cease construction on the deck at once. Obviously, any continued work on the property will result in additional citations and may directly Impact any attempts to obtain the necessary variances. Further, I believe It would be in your client's best interest to remove the deck until such time as the Planning Commission has an opportunity to review the variance request. In that regard. ✓» «V-, • • i' -^'.: — . . eS0'3Byd ”113101 *» D«nnis B. Johnsen, Baq. SCuart C. Baar, Esq. Movaabar 9» 1989 page 2 plaasa contact Jeanne wabusth aa soon as posaibla to discuss the need for aaandttants to you variance application. PXaaaa contact ne if you have any quastions. BLC:srp:999 cc: Lyle Oaan (by PAX) Jeanne Mabusth (by PAX) i.% bfe" *a* •*% . V CllY OF QRONQ CITY of ORONO Post OfRc* Bo* 66»Cry»Ul Bay. Miansaou 5M23«Municip*l Offlca* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 13, 1989 Dennis B. Johnson, Esq. Stuart C. Bear, Esq. Chestnut & Brooks 3700 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: #1473 Jacquelynn Kelly, 2056 Shadywood Road After-the-fact variance application Gentlemen: A. cart of the Orono staff's normal review procedure for all ^rop"” Ute^rn:' a ‘ccu“acro\ codes of the City. All review of the application has been j!Vn^n7nri^m^lss?or%^r new information will be Thursday, December 28, 1989. we recommend that your client's provil^^ amendments to the "x®gtinq and proposed improvements,revised survey locating all existing ana propw= t> paying particular attention to the following. 1. dimensions of driveway and on-site parking area; 2 landscaped areas with plastic underliner - areas adjacent to house and major areas in street yar ; 3. shed in northwest corner of property; 4. dimensions of deck in lakeshore yard - confirm setback to side lot line. BULDINC A ZONI.NG - 47J-73S7 ASSESSING administration a finance - 47J-7 J58 PCBLIC WORKS - 47J-73S9 Dennis B. Johnsonr Esq. Stuart C. Bear# Esq. Ra* #1473 Jacquelynn Kelly, 2056 Shadywood Road - November 13, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Although staff will be able to provide photographs of the new construction and other portions of the property under consideration, the Planning Commission will be asked to inspect the property sometime within the next week as the on-coming winter weather may prevent visual inspection at a future January meeting. Please contact my office if you have any questions concerning the above request. Sincerely, j4anne A. Mabusth, Building i Zoning Administrator JAM/tln cc: Jacquelynn Kelly, 2056 Shadywood Rd, Wayzata, MN 55391 Bryan Crawford, City Attorney Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Planning Commission Members oad - photographs of the he property under De asked to inspect as the on-coming at a future January ve any questions ;h, ig Administrator ;ata# MN 55391 \\i II OF■ ORONO CITY of ORONOPort Offic Bo« WCrysUl Bay. MinneaoU 55323• Municipal OfBcaa On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 13» 1989 Dear Property Owner: . ^ . f«r * The above referenced ^meetAng has been nub lie hearing at the Novem planning Commission of lostpoSed to the first meeting of the review of the year on Tuesday- January 1—i. — additional information wasApplication It was determiued Uat add^^^^^^^ ^e needed of ^he applicant. the meeting, the application should be received by the building information and revised /g"® ,989. ind zoning office by December 28, 198!#. I, you pl.n to attend the ^^rthe’ieetin, advis^al/e t^at you .“e'li%%Mhedul.d before the l?ann!nrcommission at their January meeting. Sincerely, acuiA^ Jeanne A. Mabusth, -^a-e-ai-nrBuilding ® Zoning Administrato JAM/tin BUILDING a ZONING-473-7357 • assessing administration a finance - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 TOi Froa: Date: Planning Connisslon Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning t Zoning Administrator November 9, 1989 Sobjectt #1474 Donald Belawski, 1695 Concordia Street - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-1C» Single family lakeshore residential# k acre# sewered Application - Request for hardcover variance to construct detached garage (remove existing garage - move garage from across street into property). List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B ~ Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Pertinent Facts - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Survey with Staff Notes & Hardcover Calculations Letter to Applicant 10/10/89 1. The existing house is entirely in the 0-75' setback zone. There is an existing detached garage near the road which applicant intends to remove. Applicant then proposes to take the white garage from the property directly east across Concordia Street# and place it in the center of this property at the end of the existing gravel driveway. 2. Hardcover on the property is as follows: 0-75' 75-250' Overall Existing 1183 s.f. (31.5%) Allowed 0 s.f. (0%) Proposed 1183 s.f. Excess 1183 s.f. 1960 s.f. (21.5%) 2275 s.f.(25%) 2103 .sf. (172 s.f.) (23.1%) 3143 s.f.2275 s.f.3286 s.f. 1011 s.f. 3. There are just a few areas of existing hardcover on the property that could reasonably be removed to reduce hardcover. These include: A) The 19 s.f. concrete walk between the house and the shoreline. Zoning Fil® #1474 November 1989 Page 2 of 2 B) 100 a.f. Of rock and plastic on the north side of the house. This would reduce the 0-75* hardcover to 28.41. The existing driveway is minimal already. The apparent intent of the applicant is to remove the existing garage slab, and the hardcover numbers above reflect its removal. 4. There is an existing sewer main crossing the property about 100* in from the road» and a 10* easement either side of that pipe. Hardcover on the property could be significantly reduced by lociti.ng the new garage nearer the road, thereby shortening the driveway. Note that if the new garage was placed at the 30* minimum required setback with doors facing the street, 75-250* hardcover would be approximately 800 s.f. less, but would still require a hardcover variance. Discussion - The applicants nave stated that they prefer to have a detached garage located relatively near the house. The currently existing garage is 150* from the house. The proposed garage would be about 40’ from the house. The actual hardcover increase on the property amounts to 143 square feet. Removal of 119 square feet of hardcover in the 0—75* would leave a 24 square foot increase overall. Staff Racomsienftatiop - A Planning Commission recommendation for approval could be conditioned on removal of areas of existing excess hardcover as noted above. In his application, applicant notes the long, narrow shape of the lot and the location of the house as being unusual conditions which contribute to the excess hardcover associated with the long driveway, ’'n-ther possible factor is the location of the sewer main easeme ., which forces the garage to be totally on one side of the easement or the other. eqeipt- CITT OF ORCOK) - VARIAUCE APPLICATIOB Initial Application F«« $150.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ^ 1 474 PItOPERTT LOCATION Site Address /C'j ■e.}Ui 7^^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) t ^-ll ^13^ O-o . * Please check one ~ Property _ _ abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. . v» sv- . . . . * < r f t ♦ - X i APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ' Phone (work / Address . 77c citv: zip: 32^:^^ l (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:2ip:_ Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property : ResidentialLal^ Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost Describe request in detail D rL^yL4>zj-<£> VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other J BMtDSHlP Describe undue hardship or practical ditriculty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations;_ DBSCRIPTKM OF UHUSUAL PROPERTT CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code^^^irements IRBD SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey includinc hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. dS © The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_____ ___________ Date APPLICANT'S SI6HAT0RB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplieA^s true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge . Applicant •s Signature A^ - JZo - Sr 9 OWNBRS SIGNATDRB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable^,ex)try onto the property by City staff, consultants. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification ofy this..-ceque&' Owner's Signature Z'L /-n ~ —————————— ———————— “t—————————————— Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. aa.1 a* mu un unv5H(MTCM 001 smFiii OM«rT OTY XMFOOmriQN SYSTfH CSfCtS UST mrair no. ox^siooiI ‘ iiCMNii »dMimam/Aim so 17-117-n 27 0010 014SS CONCOKOIA ST NONtOi • i ELAINI N OAVIO N t NOtLY N lISS 1415 CONCORDIA ST MAYZATA m 551 fI SO 17-117-IS Zt toil •1475 CONCORDIA ST HfiEN A TAAlNOi NELIN A TRAINOR 1475 CQKCOIIOIA ST HAYZATA m 551 fl 10 17-117-7S ZZ OOIY01745 CCfCQROlA ST Alice S DCTwfY RAUt J lOZONlE 1745 COfCORDlA ST HAYZATA tS4 55S01lOMCRTAXRAYCRNAIC/AOOR SO 17-117-C5 ZZ 0020 •1725 CONCOROIA ST CNARtfS N OLSON CRARtiS M OLSON 1725 CONCOIOIA ST S NAYZATA m 55101 SO 17-117-21 22 0021 01705 CQNCOMU ST JANET JACOOSON SACKS JANET SACHS 7545 ITTH AV $0 RICHFIELO 191 55425 10 17-J17-2S 22 002201405 coroniA stT L RAIN ANA RAIN THQHAS L RAIN 1405 COrCORiilA ST NAYZATA HN SSlfl U. .*iF-VlOMNiR KAMI TAXRAYfR NAAS/Am SO 17-117-25 22 002S 01405 CONCORDIA ST 0 J i 0 R OELAMSRI OCNALi JOHN OfLAMSRI 1019 COLORADO AVI H CRYSTAL NM 55422 SO 17-117-23 22 0074 0140/ CONCOROIA ST ALEX N OElAKja ETAt GLEN OEM«TT 1407 CONCOROIA ST NAYZATA NM 55191 10 17-117-21 22 001001740 COICORDIA ST A S OSXiY A i L SCMROii Al*Cf S Q6AEY AND 0IA»7IE I SCHROER 1740 CCK COROIA ST NAYZATA HN 55191 8 RROP AOOR TAXRAYfR mm/Mm so 17-117-25 22 0051 01495 CONCOROIA ST DAVID OELAHSia ET AL DAVID OfLAMSRI 1400 CONCOROIA ST NAYZATA m 55391 50 17-117-21 22 0912 01400 CCNCCmik ST DAVID OElANSia IT AL DAVID OELAHSia 1400 CQNCOmiA ST NAYZATA rtl 55191 TOTAL 0/TCH 001 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE TACTS RERRESENTtO ARE AN ACCUMTE AND TRUE RERRESENTATIGN OT IMTORNATION AS IT ARREARS THIS UTE ON THE RECORDS THE HDtORIN COltTTY DCRARTNEHT OF RRCX»ERTY TAXATION* TO JHE BEST or NY ANONLEOGE AND OELUT DATe <I » ! ) «. ... CITY of ORONO CITY FmI (Mem Box ^•Cry^Al Bajr, 55323• MwiictpaJ Oflkw ORONO On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 10, 1989 Donald J. Belavski 3819 Colorado Avenue North Crystal, MN 55422 Re: 1695 Concordia Street Dear Mr. Belawski: Thank you for the survey submittal in support of your application for construction of a new detached garage on the above referenced property. A review of that survey and your hardcover calculation indicates a variance is required for the proposed construction. On this property, the 75-250* zone is approximately 9,100 square feet in area. Your total allowed hardcover on the property would be 25% of 9,100 or 2,275 square feet. Per the attached hardcover sketch and review, note that all hardcover in the 0-75* zone (where no hardcover is allowed) is credited against your 75-250* zone. Total proposed hardcover per your hardcover calculations is 2,899 square feet. We calculated based on your proposed garage location that some additional driveway would realistically be needed to serve the garage, bringing the total up to 3,199 square feet, an excess of 924 square feet. Based on the above information, a hardcover variance is definitely required in order for this garage to be constructed. I have enclosed a copy of the variance application for your use should you wish to apply. If your completed application and submittals are returned to this office by noon on Friday, October 27, 1989, your application would be scheduled for the November 20th Planning Commission meeting, with the earliest possible City Council final action on December 11, 1989. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely Michael P. Ga&fron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/tln WORKS - 47 3-7359 ASSESSING To: FrcMi: Dot«: Subject Mayor Grabek ( Orono Council MenhAvo Orono^S? Com»li»lon Chairnan Iteilay .5 Comia.ion Manbar.City Adainistrator Barnhard^ Jaaana A. Mabu.th, Balldin, a Adr,l„l.tr.tor Novenber 14, 1989 Variance -^Public*Hearlng***' I-inden Lane - turtlnent Ordinance - can remain’on a proterty^that accessory structure residence. The previo^^^ contain 1 principal 29, 1989 (control ed bu J bVl^^^^^^^^^ October result of a hazardous buildino Oepartment) as a the hazardous building action ^ the City. During Btructur. waa navaj ^dSrUsad ‘he .cta.i«? principal residence, aDollo«n^ After the removal of the either remove the pool or to JilV?® the nlldto th.®i^®!' the pool to remain I ‘Publication ^‘^iance application as thev ^1^^ ^ k**! home some time within the near ^ build their new the residence has not been Vsta^^.H Construction time of pump house ^n the prooertv I’hore is a 12'xl4* Applicants have advised th.^t the addressed. sunni^^2" aarves as a storage shed^^^Th* excellent jupplaad watar for lawn malnt.n’ancaf id i;*cS™L«y’i"o ‘‘t“j: Sonlng District - LR-lA Required Area ■ 43 5sn « e . Exiatin, . 61.05, if?? Hardcover Pacts - 75-250* -^3,043*s°f ^Ar^? H)s.f. or 7.431 (includes water retention portion of pool) stmctora. - Required ■ 75* Existing « 81* B) Pump House - Required ■ 75* Existing m 441 Variance « 31* or 41% /O. Zoning Pile #1476 November 14, 1989 Page 2 of 3 List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B1 » 2 - Applicants' Addendum Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit B - Burning Permit 10/26/88 Exhibit P - Inspector's Letter 9/1/09 Exhibit G - Tax Records for 5 Separate Parcels Exhibit H - Hardcover Pact Sheets Exhibit I - Survey Roeiew of Current Appliration ■* The City commenced Hazardous Building Action against the subject property late 1987 and finally reached a completion status in the fall of 1988. Mr. Prass, the current applicant and owner of the property# agreed to the removal of the principal structure via a controlled burn by the Mound Fire Department (October 29, 1988). The inspection staff immediately as)ted the applicant to fence in the area of the pool to deter young children from use and/or an unsuspecting passer-by from falling into the pool area. The applicants have advised that they have no defi..ite plans for the construction of a principal residence. Staff has noted that a variance approval runs for one year and that any attempt to )ceep the pool longer than the deadline period would require additional variance approval by the City. The applicants have aslced to retain this structure for continued storage purposes. The City may as)c to inspect the pump in order to assure proper abandonment as applicant plans no use of pump. Planning Commission is as)ced to examine the condition of the fencing around the pool to determine if more permanent type fencing should be required if pool is to remain for a period of one year. Staff has received no comments from the neighbors notified for this variance review. The Planning Commission may question the applicant as to the temporary use of this property in its present state as an accessory structure such as a doc)c cannot be installed on the property without a principal residence. Options of Action Available to the Planning Coaailsslon - 1. Denial. Refer to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) for necessary findings of denial and require the removal of the pool and pump house by _ _ _ _ _ _ - 1989. Zoning File 11476 November 14, 1989 Page 3 of 3 2. Approval based on the following findings: a) Required fencing shall place the pool structure in a safe condition while it remains without a principal residence to control pool area. b) The property well exceeds the required 1 acre in area and width standards and can legally sustain a principal residence without the need for further variances. Approval ■ay be based on one or more of the following conditions: i. Applicants are hereby advised that building permit for a principal residence must be applied for prior to the deadline date of formal variance approva'.. If application for building permit has not been realized by deadline date, the pool structure must be removed within 30 days of the expiration date of the variance resolution. If applicants must file for a renewal variance to keep the pool, this application must be filed 30 days before the expiration date of the original resolution. ii. Prior to Council formally granting or adopting a resolution of approval of the variance, applicant must file for the legal combination of the 5 separate parcels. iii. Provide permanent fencing around pool area. iv. Applicants may not construct a residential dock on the property as the property does not contain a principal residence. A dock is considered an accessory structure. V. Upon application for a building permit, the survey must be revised to show principal structures on property to the immediate north and south to determine average lakeshore setback line. The new residence must meet the b««tback of average lakeshore building line. vi. Special directives for use of pump house? funic Receipt- CITT OF OROBO - VMIIABCB APPLICATIOH Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application; After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY LOCATION #1 TTTV -1Cwail w‘i w‘MU'iturvv'.rr r^cc'^rc a w'tai'Vfc w V'V'V Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property/_ _abstract c i f I I * ^ai 1 r %V a a y V • vv /••ijrri' n a U ^WWI^ 'W Aw'VtVV.VLrrT.’sr.-t.^VV ^nn •I iw'W^^v wwa MV a iv ' "Vw a V .* • .* 0 * torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <pv Phone (home) ^ ' f^ _ Phone (work) 0 ^ Address ^ City; _ _ _ _ Zip; OMMBR (if different than applicant) Name kf>irk f^ttcKre t' Phone (home) i^VV~^5r^/ Phone (work) Address:jLkf>C A/evaeJn A\/ S Citv;^S//.C^/y/S^Ki^zip; 5,fV^4! Date Property Acquired __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I (d*©) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land _ _ MB ^ •• ** PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ _ _ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (month/year) Present Use of Property SiAo/6 Jarr:il.I Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQ Describe request in detail; ^’V'Cttr.Qd Estimated Construction Cost $ VARIANCES RBQOIRED _ _ _ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front _ Hardcover Side ^ Rear) (Xw-^ain af) nr^tiisc.fu pJr'uc.-juj^ hilinau-t- pnfie/p<U srfruc-furo HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of toning regulations: DESCRIPTIOH OP OHOSHAL PROPERTY COHDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements; is^r^ RE 1. 4. • 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. tIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Henneoin County Department ot Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this applicatior. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied ify true ^d correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature r Date / OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verificatioi Owner's Signature ion of this request. . e"^ll submittals into the City offices 25 days before theApplicant must have XI1 submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings held cn the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present ai »11 scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable lo attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the :’.ilding fi Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. M l! 4 ;■ #1476 Davia ano Suzanne Prase 1774 Fremont Avenue South Minneapolis. Minnesota 55403 Octoetr 24.1989 City of Orcno Municipal Offices Post Office 3c:-: 66 Crystal Say, Minnesota 55323 Pet Description of Request We are appiyina for a variance for an accessory structure witncut a primary structure oecause our single family nome was remcvea oy request of the city oecause the primary structure hao no frost footing ana haa oeen aamagea over a perioo of time. The swimming pool/accessory structure is essential ana unique to our use of tnis property. Haracover calculations inalcate this structure falls within acceptaoie limits of Orono laKesncre Pesiaenttal Zoning Districts. J. Thanx you for your consiaeration, Oavia Prass Suzanne Prass ur consiaerat ■JH Mn MTCN Ml OMNCI NMC TAXPAYER NAHE/AOM M 07-117-23 IS MTS 01015 LINDEN LA N C KALLSER6 A E C KALLBER6 NILLIAN C RALLBER6 1015 LINDEN LA IM 553A4 NEMCPIN C0LA4TY mOOEATY INrORHATlON SYSTEM PROPERTY (»tCRS LIST SO 07-117-2S IS OOM 01027 LINDEN LA S L BRENNAN JR A C A BREltMH SIDNEY L BREfOtAN JR 1027 LINDEN LA S MOUND m 55SAA REPORT NO. P14S5A01 PACE 1 39 07-117-2S U 0095 OlOAS LINDEN LA MAS MASSERHAN HARK S NASSERMAN 1095 LINDEN LANE MOUND m B5SAA AODR DM«R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 07-117-23 IS M9« OOOSO ADDRESS IMASSIOCD LEAH RMKNER DAVID H PRASS 1779 PREMONT AVE S MPLS MN SS40S SO 07-117-2S IS 0097 010A5 LINOLN LA LEAH RACKNER DAVID N PRASS 1779 FREMONT AV S MPLS m 55903 50 07-117-2S 13 0090 OMSO ADDRESS UNASSIQNEO LEAH RACKNER DAVID PRASS 1779 FREMONT AVE S MPLS m 55903 PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AOOR OMKR NAME TAXPAYER MIHE/AOOR PROP AODR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 07-117-2S IS 0099 OMSO ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO UAH RACKNER DAVID M PRASS 1779 FREMONT AVE S MPLS MN 5590S SO 07-117-2S 15 0210 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGWO STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO SO 07-117-23 19 0018 01055 NORTH ARM OR R A A DAHL RONALD D DAHL loss NORTH ARM DR HOUND m SSS69 SO 07-117-23 IS 0207 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO 31 07-117-23 19 0015 01097 LINDEN LA L C RASPRICK A K H NESTBY L C RASPRICK ARM NESTBY 1067 LINDEN LA MOUND Ml 55369 38 07-117-2S 19 0019 01095 NORTH ARM DR SALLY A RHYLICK SALLY A RHYLICK 1095 NORTH ARM OR HOUND MN 55369 SO 07-117-23 IS 0209 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO SO 07-117-2S 19 0017 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIOCD BEN RACKNER ETAL DAVID M PRASS 1779 FREMONT AVE S MPLS Ml 55903 SB 07-117-23 19 005B 01065 NORTH ARM DR ROGER J ILLIES ROGER J ILLIES 1065 NORTH ARM OR MOUND MN 5SS69 CD ^ 5 PROP Aim ONNER NAHC TAXPAYER HAME/AOOR TOTAL BATCH 001 00015 » MM MTC 10/2S/S9 BATCH C91 tWWCPIN COUNTY MOPERTY INFCmATTON SYSTEH PROPERTY aWCRS LIST REPORT NO. PX^SMOl PACE C • • 1 ClRTinr THAT THE PACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPREStNTATION OF INPORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS Of THE HEf#€PIN COWTTY OEPARTM^ OF PROPEigY TAXATION. TO THT BEST OF KY KN0WLE06E AND BELIEF. / / OATl j;- ii ; f •. i; •/> tt • t f V? -•* I ; f ■ r i 1 • ‘ % ■ i * ;4- .* « *• •:1 •v . ..- * .; • •. •.N • nr ■>r J ■ ■ I*;• % . : -ii r i3 ii I ^- &TITTw^FIi - !• I »r • " m ••• • tu 1 8 ir s? • * .^ -•^***! "^ I • • • • ^ • • !..••♦• ■*' • • • • ^1.,. .....I • . I . • . — ' • ' * I*.. • • **■ !.............. ♦ I ! ! »' I i* *•J • ''•••A/!':*"*!‘V . • • :b * i____. J, ^ • L.4. 4 Jt /> • “ t] : : • ^ • m m m ~W-m ^ ~ ^ . ' ^ ; , I . I ; <■» I t-r-r4>r-i?>jr-r-^ V — ^ *r • ^ ^ Ct k.«.....« k. i V - I# Irr 'i X tv.4 ' V- « p -•i 4.- *v r V Date Issued; 10/26/83 Permit No.; ^ Permit to be stalled; or picked up; CITT OP OROmS P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Notice shall be given to the police department prior to burning- 544-9511. Expires after 30 days from date issued. OPEN BORHIHG PERMIT / ^ Cj r** I— / ^ /I ^ DATESITE ADDRESS; f''C~^ Phone; , ^ (h) ^**^^6 ^(o)-- - ^ - - - —,Tr~ _ _ Name: rJ_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Mailing Address; //—/^rf.r2]City; Agent (if applicable); Zip; FOR THE PURPOSE OP BURNING - - - ,_ _ _ _^_ _ _ __ This application for open bdming will be accompixsned in accordance with the conditions listed. The recipient of the permit shall comply with all other state and local laws regarding open burning including obtaining the required permits. (NOTE: More than 5 times per year (for all organisations and individuals regardless of tax status) will be charged a $100.00 annual fee.) Signature Approved by; vJrMA Inspectors Inspected by; t ents; Fire Department: Long Lake Maple Plain ^^Mound^^ Wayzata The Fire Department must sign this bujnfing permit if they will be doing burning for the applicant. / J ✓ / / the "Fire Department THE FOtlOWIXC ITEMS ar* to b« complotod ^fore th« inspector arrives (If Inspector ha fa-iBsp«ct site because Itcas were not cowplete, there will be a $20.00 charge per 8 to F8- le Str88t address most be posted and visible from the street 2e Bum pile BMSt be stacked at bum site meeting the following? «• Minimum 50* from buildings - Wood and paper products only • 9* maximum diameter# 4 high maximum 3. It piles are not easily found and no one will be home, you oust draw a map on bacK side of permit application locating the bum pile. ^ 4. If these conditions are not met, the permit will be denied and you may not apply to another permit for 30 days. , , 3. Read all condltlona on baclcslda of permit before burning. Violations of tnase conditions may result In the Issuance of citations and permit may be revokad- nT.T. SITES HILL BE INSPECTED before issuance of burning permit, subject to availability of staff time. I pi [ CITV I OF I [QRaNcy F CITYof ORONO Peat OCRce Box 68 • Crystal Bay. Minnssou S5323 • Municipal Offii On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka September 1, 1989 David Press 1774 Fremount Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 Re: 1065 Linden Lane - Hazardous Condition on Prooertv Dear Mr. Press: I conducted an inspection at the above subject property on September 1, 1989. During this inspection I found the following: 1. The swimming pool has been left unsecured from preventing children from playing in the area or falling into the pool. 2. The swimming pool has not been maintained in a manner in which the pool can be operable. I am writing this letter to inform you that the above items must be corrected as follows: 1. If you are to maintain this pool on the property you must apply to the City for a variance to maintain an accessory structure without a principal structure. 2. If you wish to not proceed in that manner, the pool should be removed from the property. 3. As stated in a letter, date December 1, 1988, until the swimming pool matter is resolved you must provide a fence around the pool to prevent c.hildren from playing in the area and from falling in. ' On September 6, 1989, I will conduct an inspection to verify that this fence in installed around the pool to minimize the hazard. The City is requesting that by September 28th, you either remove the pool or apply for a variance to maintain this pool on the property. Your failure to proceed with these orders will result in citations being issued and the matter referred to the City attorney for appropriate legal action. If you have any questions on this matter please feel free to contact me. BUILDING a ZONING-473-7357 • ASSESSING AOMLNISTRATION 4 FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 ... . . J- - - Sincerely^ Thomas J. Jacobs,^ Building & Fire Inspector TJJ/jb cc:Mark E. Bemhardson, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth» Building & Zoning Administrator Ben Whitney, City Attorney Lyle Oman, Building Inspector Orono Police Department Mound Fire Department ! i i I \ ' I I l.r.(.AL DtSCRlPTION INF ORriATIOf!INQUIRY CODE 103 FROfCRTV ID 07 117 23 14 0017SCH DST 2 77 WIRi’Ht 3 lUR Di'I If fRUJ »tARLIE.VI DELINQ YR ArRf ,.Cr JM,OWNER BEN RACKNER ETmLPROP ADDR 38 ADDRCr^ UNA^i’lLMED TAXPAY N/A DAVID H PPAr^1774 FREMONT AVE "Mff^ MN 55403ADDN ’LINDEN BEACH'PAGE 1 P5C C NEXT «MUNIC 38 PLAT 42140 PARCEL 5020 1*1 V SIATIU:La:M 5-lAT CHG VERT LEGALCONDHN S _ LOT BLOCKPREVIOUS OWNERAF’PROX PAr:CEL SIZE TinN DATESMETES / BOIWDS DESCRJPIJON COM AT SW COR OF LOI 10 TH E 84 F1 THE N LINE OF LOT 12 DIS 135 FT E ALONG SAID LINE FROM N LINE OF LOI 1 .* LINE THEREOF TH S TO PEG INCI ADJ PART OF SAID VAC LANE ADJACENl 10 THE ADDN DATE FILED 10/20/1911TH NHl Y ONu A LINE THAT INIERSECTSOf in.' ( i'R I HERE or TO A PT 52 FT SI I..Y IH W PAR LljTII N LINE Of* LOT 12 TO W 1F.2 (If VAC LANf ON THE U AND THAT' Of LOf 10S LINE % Vc^ b ^ ; S* I ^ I* ^yd LEGAL DESCRIPTION INFORMAIIONrfJ'JUIRV CUDt: 103 PRUHKTV id O? 117 23 SS 0096 PAGE 1 PSC C NEXT =sen DST 27 7 UTRSHD 3 SUf< DST ITPROJ « EARLIEST DEM NO VR ACPI AGE -'n)'OWNER LEAH RACK NCRPROP ADDR 33 ADDRESS UNASSIGNLDTAXPAY N/A Dm.ID M RRASS1774 rRErtUNi AVE S HPLS MNADDN 'LINDEN Pt ACH’5‘:)403 hlINU: 38 PLAT 42440 PARCEL 3000 I IV STmTUSLAST ST AT CHG VERE LEGALC'JtJDNfi 5 ELI 006 DLOCK . .FPI:Vinos OWNERAPLRUX PARCEL SIZE If AN I'ATLSAPDN DATE FILED 10/20/1VII HETES / HOUNDS DESCRIPTION INCL ADJ 1R2 OF VAC LANE CO It®*-- \ vi)LEGAL DF5CRJfriUi< IHM><:;.AMOM INQUIRY CODE 103 RKUf I rTY ID 07 117 23 13 OOV?IFPRLU ,sen D5T 277 UlRiTHD 3 iUR Di'I FARLTESI DELINO IR ACREOLEOWNER lEAU RACKNERF'ROr ADDR 2U AIDRE^^ UMAmCOLD TAXFAY N/A DAVID M Ff<A?5‘177^ FRErlOrn AVf. 5:PAGE 1rsc c NEXT =00MI L5 ON 5uA0ZADDN ’LINDEN Dt ACirMETES / BOUNDS DESCRIPTION INCL ADJ 1&2 OF VAC lANF MUNIC 30 PLAT 42440 1'ARCEL 4500 DIV SIAIUSI AST .‘ lAT CHG VFpr LEGALCUNDMN : . LUT .002 tLOLK_ _PREVI Ql IS OWNERAPPROX PARCEL SIZE Tf AN DATESADDN DATE FILED 10/20/1911 CD H 41; I ^11 /,UD>:ov,;i< CAl.Cm.ATTO:> V.''il’i'-:ili=:ill700-000* 000-1000*■‘ ImmA a. House % • f •Icn^jih widthncfy . •j. Cir’oe — C. Orivc-aj- _ i. sice-^-''’2 5 e. Psiio/ .. DeeX t^^^dsc2po arce^i underlain 5>y plastic sheet ir-9 — ___/ SS X /2 /C^ :.•..n. f:..f 1.:’ :l. : 75 7, s //? •i.: :;.; ri.: :'i.: G. G. r G.f 2. O /. O Jj • 2 6 , • C7::;c !i;vRDCov:*:‘ :s zomz \ \ dr?y :!) /)/y O /'/'ASS \I I’M l^u »!<•• ••.**: * *• KiciGtinn ll.irdrovcr k 100l.oi /.ren h'ithin r.onc/•t,^e>o IPO y.TzAd«!: l :«> ».» 1 ••-•»*: lo }»«' .kUI**!! In rone:i.cM h TOTM.:: : :> :. ri.F. TO BE /vDor.D ■> Exi f.t 1 .••5 !‘ ir di’< ?r : \o he ;:cr.i(.'vcd, if any: :-.'rnth X Width « \/ ?r. r^.F. to be bekoved riiKil E. iiicovor iroTOGal; iLino ^ \.ix, :::} •'Biio (3)J I..................... ^ Exi • ::.o s. f.s.f.a. 5.s.:. a.?. (2) TOTAL S.f. s .5 s. 5. s • f • s. .f. (<) ’;*«* Adt:0<.l To )jc I^cr.ovcd rinnl Pro; c r V :: :t V » • I o jL L- ;00 *■ t iliAUDCOVLK CALCULATION V.’ORKSUKCTSetb«cli (circle onej 0-75* (^75-250^ 250-500* 500-1000*r-,Hardcover In tonea. Boose Icnqth width s.fXma.f.••X •3 - f.X .a.f. X a.f. li. Garage X •»a - f. e. Driveway .X M s.f. X • a.f. d. Sidewalk y o X ?. S » s.f. 6 X '/ . 7 V «» / V7 . ^ ? a. f . •/Z > /.5 X 6 //sr s.f. o. Patio/ € X X 9 7 >v Deck / .J X X # !• 2t> s.f. f, Uadscapt X •S.f. areas underlain X • S.f. by plastic sheeting • X a.f. X m s.f. U.:/ < f. Other X m 7 7JT s.f. iro^S t/.s ^•?o.f. ^ X / tm 9 ».f. HARDCOVER It;20KE a ^ s.f. m /^/ > ; V*rxlstin., ttardcover l - Total r«I,tin^ tUrdcovor « 100Lot Area within ZoneJoi/j ~y' X 100 •• 7. V_?j^JItionaljiardcovir to be added in rone, T t r*m — —. X - »idth « TOTAL «.f. — --------- * -__________ - ■_________ «.f. 0 X X TOTAL S.F. TO DE ADDED Cxi St 109 l-ardcovor to bo noraoved. If any: ___ I ten l.f. a.f . s.f. (2) Loncjt?i Width X X TOTAL l.f. __________ t.f. _________ i.f. S.f. 0 total s.f. to DE HEMOVED Final H.irdcovcr Proposals (Lino (1) 4 Lino (2) -Line (3)J » S.f. n) I % j - Exisli,;, To be Added To bo Removed Final Proposed liardcover % » s.f. (4) Line (A) X 100 «s.f.X 100 - i; jm uAkdcovuk calculation worksheetSetback rone: Icirelo one) 0-75* 75-250* ^S0-50o3>»8<tinq HJf<ico*>cf In tonea. House length width s.f txlsUno Hardcover t - Total Rvlating Hardcover a 100lot Area Within loneoS JOCii.t.3 • r • • A ^—— X 100 • tinderlkle __ by plastic sheeting _ f. Other X X STirC HARDCOVER I»J lOKC s.f.Additional Hardcover to bo added In tonoi________ It^W f.onrsfK w __X m S.f.•« X m s.f. b. Garage X m s.f* c. Driveway X a.s.f.X X • a.f.TOTAL S.F. TO DE ADDED j Hardcover to bo Renoved. ifd. sidewalk X m a.f.Existin<Jiny t X ea s.f.—------__________ Lcnqth X Width m TOTAL ft X m s.f._______:___ X a vy 1 ft la n 0. patio/X m s.f.X Deck X m a.f.X m f. undscape .X 1*a.f.X m S.f. a.f. s.f. s.f. (2) s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. (1) TOTAL S.F. TO BE REMOVED s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. C3) Final Hardcover Proposal i [Lire (1) ^ Lino (2) -Line (3)J . t Existing To bo Added To bo Removed rropoaod liardcover t « I -s.f» (<1 Final line (<> * 100 s.f. s.f.X 100 - 1 *☆ .• /A. To;Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson IProHs Dates Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 14, 1989 Subject:#1478 Robert J. Ritchie, 3572 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit/Comirercial Site Plan Review Public Hearing Xoning District - B-5, Limited Neighborhood Business District Required Area * 20,000 s.f. Existing » 13,450 s.f. Review of Existing Sub-standard Setbacks - refer to survey (Exhibit F) Side Setback West Lot Line - Required «» 15' Existing ■ 11'2" Sub-standard Setback Variance = 3'10" or 26% Street Setback - Required ■ 35' Existing » 34' Sub-standard Setback Variance « 1' or .02% List Of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Floor Plan Approved with Building Permit Issued 1986 Exhibit E - Floor Plan Submitted with Curi-cnt Applies*-’.on (note; not to scale) Exhibit F - Survey - 1978 Exhibit G - Site Plan/Sketch Pertinent Ordinances for the Review - Section 10.44, Subdivision 4 (A) - Conditional use permit required for veterinary use - no zoning amemdment required as originally thought by Zoning Administrator. Veterinary clinic use is clearly listed under conditional use permit section of B-5 code. Section 10.61, Subdivision 4 (F) - Proposed parking stalls do not meet required area standard for parking stall and backing out ability. Required * 9x20' for stall with an additional 13>j' in length for backing out maneuver. Based on site inspection with City Engineer, the existing black top area does not meet the required minimum length of 33%'. Please note cyclone fence is located on Dairy Queen property. Note also applicant's site plan denotes an 8' width for parking stalls. Zoning Pile #1478 November 14, 1989 Page 2 of 4 Section 10.61, Subdivieion 10 - Parking requirements for professional offices. One space per 200 s.f. of floor area. No specific standard established in code for clinic. Beview of Applicatl<m * The applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit to install a small animal veterinary clinic within the subject structure. No additions to existing structure are proposed. Applicant proposes use of existing parking area providing 6 stalls, 4 to rear and 2 within front yard area (refer to Exhibit G). Staff has reviewed the files noting that the structure has housed a ba:t shop, realty office and currently a professional office builuing over the past 8 to 9 years. It would appear that all the improvements for these uses have been Installed without the benefit of commercial site plan review. All uses were permitted uses under the B-5 code requiring no more than a zoning certificate of occupancy for each new use. The engineer and staff have reviewed the site and found the front 2 parking stalls meet the required area and maneuverability standard (note: no backing out onto Shoreline Drive as previous owners have allowed). The 4 rear parking stalls do not meet the required length for backing out maneuvers. Although the City Engineer's report has not been received as of this writing, it is staff's recommendation to expand the black-topped parking area to the east providing the 33ij'-25' of required length. It will be necessary to expand the parking lot along the east and south side of the rear parking lot. The parking stalls should all be designated with stripes. "No Parking" signs must be posted along entrance to rear parking lot. Per Section 10.61, Subdivision 10, the proposed veterinary use is most closely aligned with professional offices. The Planning Commission is welcome to review Section 10.61, Subdivision 10 to determine if there is another use more similar in determining required parking sta'ls. Please note that there are only 2 exam rooms for the current proposed level of use. Based on the ratio of 1 stall per 200 s.f. of floor area, the parking requirements are as follows: 1,764 s.f. of total floor area - 265 s.f. (reduction of 15% for storage area, etc.) 1,499 s.f. net floor area 1,499/200 ■ 7.49 or 7 spaces I 1 Zoning Fil« #1470 November 14, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Applicant's plan shows 6 spaces. Applicant should confirm if garage to northwest of property can be used for the parking of an employee vehicle. If this is the case, the parking standard can be met, although in light of the proposed level of use, staff would recoessend that 6 stalls would be adequate. Applicant has provided no information as to the hours of operation, number of employees, anticipated date of opening clinic to public and their pets. No drainage or land alterations are proposed with this application. Drainage continues to flow to the south and tC' the east. The new use shall be limited to 100 s.f. of signage. No sign can exceed 50 s.f. in area. Lighting has not been addressed by applicant. Applicant should advise if exterior lighting is proposed with new use. Landscaping is a difficult issue for the front yard area of the property as already the majority of the area is covered with paving. Landscaping in the front yard may create vision problems. The Planning Commission may wish to examine the site in consideration of the potential expansion of the parking area to the east and to the south for additional landscaping improve ments. Options of Action - Denial - if application is to be denied, pleare refer to necessary findings within Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 (A). Approval “ if approved, findings can be based on the following: 1. The proposed use meets the intent of the B-5 zoning district. 2. More intense commercial uses of this substandard site have existed on the property without any negative impact on the adjacent properties. ■ Zoning Pile #1478 November 14, 1989 Page 4 of 4 condltion7:“*' "ot« of the foUovlng h "J**,*^ co»bln.tlon of Lot. building pentU to'r '« hd.’o° Vrope”rty*^’"' *° *’* »»"• on west Jip™Vti'’p^^’oLV:iJhlV.t7u‘’cVu?e“f additions to the faci 1 it^ wotn^ ^ proposed conditional use permit!^ ^ ^ require approval of a new e.^BuUdln, pernlt. are required for .11 propoeed peroenent eiiployee,**the”cltv*if.Jd* eo?* property can be need by l.^n?o%u^^JtS th.t*the ,* -‘o” vorlance. l? ^JpoVt^ln Vhe'^f/nVl* pVc).Vt"5;u' “*d "“•‘‘o''lncrude‘’S?e" not. the City Upt'ri^^frorrlJittid^t^rh: “4?tin,“ L .. %• CITY OF ORONO - GDIERAL LAUD DSC APPLI PROPBRTT LOCATIOS 3 7 ~Z. ^ «-< o ry *■. I»r ^ #„1478 rrrv rr WA I I k.‘r\w'i^v Site Address 4. i aiA %/i^w • A«t** *v^ v*» ” 1 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ? ^ . i> 1 • .1 > - 4-Z— O t L f. “*r** T <* Please check one - Property abstract or (for Conditional Use Applications only) a w V vvv F' ;itwC..'r-V.‘^Y,V YOU •r.^ .>0 V • vv torrea.^4-*; JJCi HCl 710:: io.:t-c Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Phone (home ) *7 T I • ^ ^ 7 fc Phone (work) A. 1 Z, - ^5Y.~72- APPLICANT Namt , "T2L«t'C u.yS _____ cl0-1 1 _______________ City ZipAddiess OWNER (if different than applicant) Name e m r*j 4 •. o »1 Address C>.o '&w3>«- Phone (home ) ’’hone ^ i - ^ 4- _________ _ City ..Lt/A^.2^ ■ ZipjSSilZll Date Property Acquired PL (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the Adjacent parcels of land PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee Af ter-the-Fact Fee $100.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) VL. $250.00 d) $200.00 f) a) Residential accessory Use Institutional (church, school, etc.) Duplex Credit/Bldg Coitunercial/Industrial Use Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or «"ore Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 ' $ 50.00 " $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals Other - see fee schedule » ?II PRESENT DSE OP PROPBRTI Present Zoning District r-tr Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ Residential Other (specify)_ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ^ Describe request in detail: ^a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C. \/a ^ ^rr I A. ry . O J REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Prop'''t'> Owners List of owners wxthin 350' (you can obtain this list from He »epin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Stamped?^ legaV sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list «/ith no return address. Certificate of survey. . . , , j Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. ^ .. -I jAs an a^”9ndum to this application, please attach a separate list OE any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -—- - - - - - 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE , , . tThe applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies the information supplied is true ajnd correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE F„r-.^K-r-The owner hereby aclcnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and ver^.Xication of this request. owner's signature _____________ Date --- unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building S Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. MM DATE lO/IS/99 iATCHQNNEII NAHE TAXPAYER:/iAOOfI OMNiA MAME TAXPAYEi NAME/AOUt OHNEfI NAME TAXPAYEI NAME/AOM PlOP AOm OltCI NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOl AOOl ONNER NAME TAXPAYEI NAME/AOM PROP AOOl ONNER NAME TAXPAYEI NAME/AOOR HENNEPIN CCAJNTY PROPERTY »TORHATIOM STSTEH PMX^TY QMCRS USTSB 17-117-Zl 54 0012 02504 OUINE AVE I H I N N HARDING ROBERT H NAI01N6 P 0 BOM 05 250% BiAINE AVE NAVARRE m 555n50 17-117-25 45 004405S41 LIVINGSTON AVfRAJ PICHAROBERT M A JEANNINE N PICHA 5450 SEAMANS OR EXCELSIOR m 5555150 17-117-25 45 004405577 LIVINGSTON AVE ELIZABETH J BALTER ELIZABcTM J BALTER 5577 LIVINGSTON NAYZATA m 555^1 50 17-117-25 45 0052 05544 LYRIC AVE HAL SHANSGN MICHAEL SHAN50N 5544 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55541 58 17-117-25 45 0055 05554 LYRIC AVE PATRICIA J GALLETTO SCOTT A NARY SIOHELL 5554 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA ftl 55541 50 17-117-25 45 0050 05500 LYRIC AVE R T HILL ARM HILL RONALD T A KELLY M HILL 5500 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA m 55541 50 17-117-25 45 004405525 HVI1E5ST0N AVE M G BONUN A P A BOHLEN MICHAEL G A PAULETTE BOHLEN 5525 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN SS54158 17-117-25 43 004703551 LIYINCSTON AVI DAVID M REINHOLO DAVID N REINHOLO 5551 LIVirjCSTOM AVE NAYZATA ffl 55341SB 17-117-23 43 0050 03585 LIVINGSTON AVE N A 0 MEYERS NEIL H A OOTMA J MEYERS 3585 LIVIMCSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55341 38 17-117-23 43 0053 03580 LYRIC AVE EVERARO A GEYEN ETAL MICHAEL I LAURA SNANSON 3544 LYRIC AVI NAYZATA MN 55341 38 17-117-23 43 0054 03534 LYRIC AVE RICHARD R GILMORE CHARLES LEHIS HErOCf 3534 LYRIC AVI NAYZATA fIN 55341 38 17-117-23 43 0054 03500 LYRIC AVE J C A B POLINGO JOHN A BECKY POLINGO 3500 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA If4 55341 REPORT NO. PX4S5401 PAGE 2438 17-117-23 43 00450S533 LIVINGSTON AVE PETER r NIESEN JR ETAL HR PETER F NIESEN 3533 LIVINGSTON AV^E NAYZATA MN 5534138 17-117-23 43 004003554 LIVINGSTON AVE 0 LEFEBVRE A L S CARNES DOMINIC LEFEBVRE 3559 HINGST3N AVE NAYZATA MN 55341SB 17-117-23 45 0051 03544 LIVINGSTON AVE ZE LMA N MCKIN^Y ZELMA A HCKIFtCY 3599 LIVINGSTON NAYZATA MN 55341 SB 17-117-23 43 00B4 C3572 LYRIC AVE EVERARO A GEYEN ETAL MICHAEL A LAIAA SHANSONI 3594 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55341 38 17-117-23 43 0057 03520 LYRIC AVE J A V NEGLEY Jims A VICKY NEGLEY 3520 LYRIC AVE N NAYZATA MN 55341 38 17-117-23 43 0071 03444 LYRIC AVE JAMES A JOHTGQN ET AL JAMES A PENNY JOHNSON 3444 LYRIC AVE N NAYZATA m 55341 #1478 J) ) i-I> I I *. ■ j 9: ) ’ I : ■> i J. s • . $m Mti iCNNEPlH COUNTYBATCH MPROP AOOR OHNERTIO<PAYfRHAHE/AOOfiPROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 56 X7-117-2I OOfO05A99 LYRIC AVE GARY N NOLFSTEUER GARY N NOLFSTELLER 21SA CARDINAL LAIC MOUND MN BS3A456 i;-ll7>25 AS dlOO0S505 LYRIC AVE RUBY L LINOBLAO RUBY L LINOBLAO 5505 LYRIC AVE MAYZATA MN 55S91 #4:^ 7 8PROPESB 17-117-25 AS OOAI OSAAA SHORELINE OR DAVID CHARLES BIE DAVID C BIE lAlO SHAOYNOOO ROAD NAYZATA m 55SA158 17-117-25 A5 010105515 LYRIC AVE N F BOLDER ETAL m F BOLDER 5515 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN S55A1 REPORT NO. PIA55A0I PAGE 5058 17-117-25 A5 OOA20SA8A SHORELINE DR DAVID CHARLES BIE DAVID C BIE IRIO SHADYNOOB ROAD NAYZATA MN 555A158 17-117-25 AS 010205525 LYRIC AVE L L THOMPSON i T J LOGEAIS L L THOMPSON A T J LOGEAIS 5525 LYRIC AVE SO NAYZATA MN 555A1 ;i! ^ !J: PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SB 17-117-25 A5 0105 055A1 LYRIC AVE DONNA M LIEN DONTtA M LIEN 55A1 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 555AI 58 17-117-25 AS OlOA 05551 LYRIC AVE H R DOHMEN ION OMCN NICHOLAS t DEBORAH DOHMEN 5551 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA HN 55591 SB 17-117-25 AS 0105 05559 LYRIC AVE A i A DERRY ALBERT 1 ALICE DERRY 3559 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 ) ' f f ) PROP AOOR QltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR mP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 17-117-21 AS OlOA 05585 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA 8R t TRUST CO TRSTEE GARNET JUEIiCE 3585 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 17-117-23 A3 ^00058 ADDRESS UNASS ONEO Etc NORHOOO PETER R NASON Cyt) EARL B_ _ _ _ , _ ;A0 vine PL MN 555 : • • • • 38 17-117-23 A3 01A9 0557A SHOPELINE DR S R PARTNERSHIP S R PARTNERSHIP 15267 HIGHLArm TRAIL mNNETONKA MN S55AS 58 17-117-25 AS 0107 05590 SHORELINE DR EVERARD GEYEN EVERARD GEYEN BOX 6A MOUND MN 555AA 58 17-117-25 A5 0115 055A2 SHORELINE DR DAVID S PETERSON LOHELL R ZITZLOFF 12500 B NAYZATA 8LVD MINNETONKA MN 555A5 58 20-117-25 12 0011 02A15 CARMAN ST KAREN A PEDERSON KAREN A PEDERSON 2A15 CARMAN ST NAYZATA rtl 55591 58 17-117-25 AT^ll 05572 SHORELINE m E A 6 NORHOOO PETER R MASON C/0 EARL 8 .560 VINE PL m 5556A 58 17-117-25 A5 OllA 05502 SHORELINE OR LOHELL R ZITZLOFF LOICLL R ZITZLOFF 1805 NAYZATA BLVO NAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 12 0012 02651 CARMAN ST JALHAR E AUNE t HIFE JALMAR E AUNE 2651 CARMAN ST NAYZATA MN 55591 \ * } i 1 ;• f » I ) ! > . RUN OATI iATCJi OM HENNEPIN COKTY PRCPEimr rNTOWUriON SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIRS5401 PAS 51pinp Am ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NRNE/AOOR Sa EO-117-E5 12 CHI15 02A45 CA0UN ST DIANE N FISCHER DIANE FISCHER 2<V45 CARMEN ST HAYZATA MN S5591 58 20-117-25 12 002102A5A CASCO POINT RO J C ROBERTS A J E ROBERTS JOHN C I JANET E »BERTS 2^54 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA M4 555R1 58 20-117-25 12 002202A28 CASCO POINT RO S P J SIU»0STEPHEN J A JEAN R SRORO 2A28 CASCO PT RO HAYZATA MN 55591PIKF Am ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 58 20-117-25 12 0025 02A08 CASCO POINT RO TAN HEFTYTED J A MARLENE T HEFTY 2A08 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA Mi S5591 58 20-117-25 12 002700058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO NARO E EDHAROS HARD E EDNARDS 5545 eLEr«RJRST AVI ST LOUIS PARR MN 55414 58 20-117-25 12 002802480 CARMWI ST RICHARD A EIMAROS RICHARD A EDHAROS 2460 CARMAN ST HAYZATA MN 55591 pmp Am ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/Am 58 20-117-25 12 0054 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO lOHARO T A GLORIA A LEHMAN EONARO T i GLORIA A LEHMAN 2414 CARMAN ST HAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 12 0057 02414 CARMAN ST E T i G A LEHMAN EONARO T LEHTtAN 2414 CARMAN ST HAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 12 0058 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIOCO ANTHONY F LASELLE ET AL ANTHONY F LASELLE A CHARLOTTE AOOISON-LASELLE 2440 CARMAN ST mriO MN 55591 PROP Am OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 58 20-117-25 21 0028 05405 SHORELINE OR N N 8ELL TELEPHONE CO NH BELL TELEPHONE CO-TAX MGR 100 S 19TH ST DOUGLAS BLOG RH 1050 OnANA NE 4B102 TOTAL BATCH 008 0004#1478 I CERTirV THAT THE FACTS REPRESCMTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INfORmTION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTV DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE 'loji y I> ‘ > li. ' t V 9 I I ’9* //WV i ff -ir-f-----^X.: o<>; I u v r ;rv ^3^ ' 'V" • % *lll Jk I % *** *L* _ *• ^ (V :v ^ ik'/ ; L»V‘*J ‘><rOH 1i5 • I ,^-v6 V '*!••» *"’ *'-»C ;;.• •** i ’ i I •?k > ,*4 ■•'•<'•* -Sir v*.\> i/ ^ ,r- v>* ' "vl O/0.4 I / /*» • ■>)>.f)!>«J ’>]^i -It I M I lO , » » > 7 •'« I • LIVINGSTON '•l. ‘h .V »U: " V * •J -* "< \-aM * XfcS* -I ^ Jr 1 - ** % *1 \. 5 4 fi>’'* i' ‘i ,p>VA ft t'jj <yl t ' ''I AVC 1^ ^ [i» ' !• ;rf »t il'Koi I rr j « i»^ to ';J»U « s I tl tt I ts *''»•) ^''' W ) .14 I It-f It M I 10 J— ‘•y# rTj »• *i.> t • I 4 ^ »•. -J It J !• ^ IT I H ! It tO^ll tt *’*' it N») M', ‘"*'li’| *?. Ltff>C I t tv 3t I N I 10 '«*v; ri‘'A%Ar' JUfr-w_i_*.-i -----i " ^ vy'j VS.ri* .< ; »I J• . ir ' It ' It ; to' ti i I 4' l tt' 'n -T \ Jifo '• *^fr7i V \ \r 11#^ \ \ \ \ \ r **: >.■■■ I ■■■ ....... f \yt?__________ ililSLiJ!i.^'' 1' f k ! 4 *-V- ’rvn^j M .M) •‘ '? • • .♦ «,v dt i9 T^ « / (5r t'< •^»‘•/ , * -**.* 4- >• ' C0VE ‘>i^*^ ^ - • ♦ -y / i' •' ■ • N* * \ i / . J * »••: < ^ ^ ...*• ;c^v/ v#.i ■••■• •* .•' • :i' * ••f •/••' ;• ;• v|^*v • .* "1 I i* •[" j" r*"•I * *\ I *INSPECTOfl,Q-••-------1 cToi.-T;5>^■•Hi KUAN tiUVIEWI; !OATC 1A-_________ PERMIT MO.APPROVED AS SUBMITTEDi S APPROVED WITH CORRECTIONS AS NOTED i • □ ■ NOT APPROVED — CORRECT & RESUBMITI------*‘T - -A Thfs« comments for your lnto<nuition. Art work Mia* b« donti In fun comp!i^nc9 with all ai-tpilcaLla builriiiig 4 loninf coda ra* Quireii»^ils ;nciul:i^ licins net * poolicaby noted m tins raviaw.‘KETP THIS FLAN SET ON SITE ATlALL TIMES.7^-STAIRS arWAX. RISER I/O* MIN. treadCUARDR^AIL open sides I J I £ I • )y,I I < I ‘ k ^ a - • t £A/A^A{ . i . .1 .lilt •’■ is-^t ----- .. I . I_V-*i M* — • — ~x I iT'vf' I- V ^ •I !,n. l^K iI « I• * to. ♦.provide treated platesir€L //'¥'jj" —« - I s ^ • / i i yo ejtT Li ^WV MIT oroNoI review r*'*— ! iff»'j i ^— IHSI»ECT« L_„„ ^PERMIT U n jAPPROVEDAS SUbMilitu! I •V Jf APPROVED IWITH CORF’ ECTIONS A ' □ - [not APPROVED -| CORRECT «. R Thesf cornments ice •or, youf infc mation. M w ki fiHI compli.inca iWm ill appH^ M buN<Mnc • 1 f\ \ not \ j^cifjcaWy w ■p THIS PLAN stjr qi-siTL^ (PW^ ^40.I I ; rJOTED [SUBMIT )rk shc^fl he don# zoning code r#* d in tins feview. 11 TIMES. ' I i -.. i . i 1 ‘ ii I 1 --1 1 .• 1 1 t i “i t »1 1 1 1 to • —• *—to . to ^ ,i -'f* 1 i t ' !• 11 1 1 t 1 I 1 -4 - 1 • <to to. a. //' ■1 ! •#147 1 C-7 Cn ^ ^ ^ ! II ■I >J J: .».. .. m •--- rl*t of Curvoy frr fStr-lV •'f ■\« j V?, Plr><*!: 7, {’tvarr® l(«l«:r4Ui r-’int-, •*lrn<»:)Ttn j i 4. t . • t . • ^ Ad .. .» ' •i •-. • •» . • . - rr’ ’ * • ‘Certificate Of C^irv^r: v • . -v ; * I hotrby v-^. tify that t>.l3 is a en-J correct rjpreawp.Viti^n of n svirvey of th« bounlttvios of Lota 18 and 19, Hlock 7, f.'averro Heights, end the locatloa of all Cyilatixur buildin;;a then^jn. It dO'ia not pi^;x>rt to sho«not*i*^ IjivroTe — r*ent:» or onrrouch.*:c»nt8. ' ^ 1" = :«o* Iron ncir.c-T ■;o*-co» ». (>o' fin Nc, 6064 Sur''e;'or erwJ Planner Lt-r.f* i^itv, > lime so to • • • • . • • • PW • . . i... - "j: ' . . . ■ •• ■/• . ■• - .• *i • '. •• ■ ", • • -■ ■• .• ': • - • . .. ... . .... m0 >m • • a**.; e... .. - • — ^ « .* •»«*..«» «r . _________ - _ • «•*« • L m BonestroQ Rosene Anderlik & Associates Oim G tunwwati. Jf ncrmnt Pf io«fiP C AndB»«i Pf %frm Pf ismn C Own Pf Gip^n • Coo* Pf f Pf G ktmnm Pf l kPVM Pf %ppi * OKmaar Pf 4ir Pl'Oft PC Oon^C 9u09^ n * foumm Pt Mart 4 HflDior Pf ^ t F««a Pf Mtc**^ ’ fauirnonr Pf %a»<if P»PP'n pf DM O UIMOM Pf W PMmn Pf merjrn c i#wcp ^ jjrm f MMno. Pf P vtoran PC Mpt t M Pt «BM»T C TiilH A I A nKPn« £ •£ t'torntam A pf Oanr J MfMon Pf Mvt A M Pf MMOi 0 «M Pf IWfPM • Andpnon Oiry r tyiM> PC Mm f Jimm pc I Pt C^jrm A Cncioor LBO M Ppamii Hanan M Oiv* IwmhM CfeM CPA Ai A Engineers 4 ArcNtects «■ NovMber 10, 1939 City of Orono 8oz 66 Crystal 3ay, MN SS323 Attn: Je&nna Habusth let Bobert J. Ritchie Veterinary Clinic Our rile No. 139-1478 Dear Jeannet Ve have reviewed the site proposed for a Veterinary Clinic on Shoreline Drive. The parking area sceas to be limited on the property. The parking at the rear of the building it acre reatrlcted than shown on the sketch plan. In addition there is no area to turn around at either the front or rear of the building. This site operated aatiifactorily as a bait shop and therefore the parking aay not be a problem. Ve would recommend that the parking in the rear be rotated as shown and a backup area added. The people parking in front will have to be careful when backing around the blind comer. If you have any questions please contact this office. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh LB/29 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 #1478 ;» *SUoaat-»»4k. “t)nui/«r «T~ A~~t-A»>j « P'r.zoio J _____ ^ 4 f i rot Dates Planning Coemi^sion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Coeeiaaion Meabera City Adminiatrator Bernhardaon Michael P. Gaffron, Aaat Planning & Zoning Administrator November 13» 1989 Subieets #1479 Doug williama/Lecy Construction, Inc., 1020 Tonkawa Road - Variance - Public Hearing Xoaing District - LR-IB, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 acre, sewered ikpplicatlon - R.qu..t for .v.raq. letbacR new residence on the property. Also, technically a lot width variance is required. List of Bahibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P • Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J “ Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Exhibit N - Exhibit O - Exhibit P - Application & Revised Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey, Proposed House Location Proposed House Plans Staff's Sketch Submitted Hardcover Calculations Staff Hardcover Review Air Photo Topography Location of Pre-1976 Cabin South Side Elevation Plan, Existing Residence Documentation, 1976 Variance * Related Setback Issues 1975 Average Setback Ordinance (34.201) Current Average Setback Ordinance (10.22, Subd 1) Survey Compilation, Average Setback iT^^xistin^lot width is 100*. Lot width required in the LR-IB zone is 140*. A lot width setback variance was granted in 1976 under the current zoning code for construction or tne house that currently exists on the property. 2. Applicants are requesting to remove the existing 13 year old residence and construct a new house area that is now driveway apron (see Exhibit F). residence will encroach approximately 32 past the d®fi"®° average lakeshore setback line, with a proposed encroaching approximately 42* past the average setback line. 3. The applicant's surveyor has shown the average setback using the second house to the north. Staff has the correctly defined average setback line based on the two adjacent residences in Exhibit F. Zoning Pile #1479 Novesiber 13* 1989 Page 2 of 3 4. 5. 6. The proposed house location on paper would appear to increase the -fields of view- enjoyed by neighboring residences. However# it is likely that the view from the Hoffman residence at 1000 Tonkawa Road might be effectively diminished due to the proposed height of the residence to be constructed. Currently, Hoffman enjoys a panoramic view ot the lake over the top of the applicant's existing house. The average setback line is the only protection Hoffman wou 4 have from further encroachment on his existing panoramic lake view. Although a full set of house elevation views has not been provided, it plan and elevation submitted that the defined height of the proposed house will meet the 30* limit# with the highest peak about 30* above the existing driveway apron. Applicant had submitted a preliminary proposal which had the proposed house located further back on the lot but still requiring an average setback encroachment. Applicant revised that proposal apparently to attempt to save 3 maple trees which would have been removed. Staff would question whether the center 18- maple can be preserved given the proposed garage and driveway locations. Prior to 1976, a cabin existed on this property in the location shown on Exhibit K. The easterly wall of that cabin was in approximately the same location as that of the currently proposed house. No average setback variance was requested or reviewed in 1976. Documentation from Council discussions responding to complaints by then and current neighbor. Marge Gasch, at 1031 Tonkawa Road indicated that the Council and staff felt that the intent of the average setback ordinance had been met by the house constructed in 1976 (see Exhibit M, especially Resolution 1780, Finding #13). Discussion - The applicants propose to replace the existing 2-level residence with a 3-level residence (walk-out level plus 2 stories). While they are reducing the degree of encroachment past the defined average setback line, they are also building upward which may have a significant effect on views enjoyed by the Hoffmans. The average setback ordinance does not address views of the lake over the top of another residence, out merely is concerned with relative setbacks from the shoreline. Because of that, the applicants could construct a house meeting the required average setback but extending as high as the defined 30 height as customarily measured, and the Hoffmans would have no recourse through City ordinances. Zoning File #1479 November 13» 1989 Page 3 of 3 Applicants have drawn their version of the average setback line between residences at 980 and 1030 Tonkawa Road, indicating they feel the Hoffman residence at 1000 Tonkawa Road is an anomaly in the neighborhood. In fact. Exhibit P, a compilation of neighborhood surveys, indicates that the Hoffman residence is setback further from the lake than other houses in the neighbor hood • Staff Rern—ie ndstion Staff would recommend approval of the required lot width variance of 40', finding that most other lots In the neighborhood are 100' in width, and further that a house has continued to exist on this property for many years, and noting that a variance to lot width for construction of the existing residence was granted in 1976. Staff does not offer a strong recommendation regarding the average setback variance. The view impact on both adjacent neighboring property owners as a result of the proposed house location, would appear to be beneficial when looking at a plan view on paper, but relative house elevations and separation distances further impact the perception of what is an acceptable house location. Any recommendation for approval, partial approval, or denial, should state carefully the reasons for such recommendation . I p LI Recaipt- cnr OF OROHO - variancb applicatioii ; -1 ‘i I t j ^ tZj ‘*>3 \ \ *“ • ^ "'V lvv V ■ ■ W •*«/ A Jw'V^ . '. VVV Initial Application F«* $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Site Address IQZO TOUKA.W^ RP. loUCs La .K&. MKl'SS^g^ 7^f’ S Ti/• a W*.!' PROPBRTT LOC^TIOH = r -. -i.n Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Oft —H~T~Z3 OOlA Please checlt one - Property _ _ abstract or y torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICABT PdU«» WlUUi^MS AaOp Name j IKlg-. Phone (home) Q<4»4 Phone (wor)c)Qi4»4-9'499 Address; iCf^^ ViKiUri, City; eCSKl PPMg.(£. Zip: ^S^44 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Sm G» Phone (home) A"! \ - 68 O (a _ _ Phone (wor)c )^~1l‘“fi£)OC» Address: In7r> RD>. City;Lr>a^ U^K^^Zip; Date Property Acquired __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) no^ alSvT own the adjacent parcels of land M 49 MS ev 9m mm •» •» •• •• •• •• •• ** ** ** ** PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District L.(2. I - B Present I'se of Property ^(»>-)6it_£. (L-Sy^Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ‘ZTI^jOPO Describe request in detail; \/AJZ j ~T^ PL->»C^ H<D0S€> QLi PiLiwig -t-tw>rKd AaJgig.A.^e. ‘^grrBAXi^-------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c Variances ( Lot Width Front _ _ Hardcover Side Rear) Other Aik/gg-A^e. t?^rBAO=- VAg-l A.V^CJ£ J undue hardship or practical difficulty rasuUln,fron, strict s»nforcement of zoning regulations; WCOuD XP—— description of ONOSOAL PROPERTI conditions -T-riinn Describe unusual property conditions preventiM ^mpUan« Code Paqiii rements : gasU Tg fM* T ^ -------E------- iu T?^_e>Tff£y-_ _____________________________^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 2* Certified Property^ Coiners”List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain2. Certified Property of Finance A-603 Govt Center 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance StampVdV 'legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed each ^he names on the^ above list with no return address (use address labels C«\\^\^'at1^o^ calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any g in existing grade are proposed. ^ Plat Map (obtained with property owners . .stj. n of As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City starr^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ThrApVlleant and Property Owner must sign jr^^he^aboJe remember that your variance application is not complete information has not been included. CertificItiorbrZonlng’DepIrtment that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICAOT'S SIGNAT^ agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all JnSsual expenses incurred in review of this application, and^Srinfo^tic-suppli^l^true und correct to the best of hrs/her knowledge. /0-2^ ^ Applicant's signature ______________________________ -------------------------- ?ir^tnVrT^y ackowledges and agrees to this JPPl authorises reasonable entry onto the PPPP"^^'’^, “JV of In^estiga- agent Sr Commission membersr and Council members p tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature cuow Date (0.27. Applicant must have all submittals 3^ are^ he^ on the Planning Commission Meeting. Planningi 1 scheduled third Monday of each month. Applicants must be is review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If have an Snlile to attend a scheduled meeting, please make authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Bui 9 Office of this change prior to the meeting. Receipt- CITY OF OROHO - VMUAHCE APPLICATIOH • • ■1 j "-'f••A f J ■ i' itInitial Application Fee $150.00 // ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTT LOCATIOH Site Address \OZO TO*sJKA.WA Rp, Losi^a La,Ve^. MtJ. SS3S4» Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Oft —lt~T-ZS CO(4 Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or V torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on recuired survey. APPLICANT ptHjip WlU^i^MS Name \ (Kig,. Phone (home) Q<4«4 — Phone (work)QM'4“9'499 Address: lcr^4o VtRtU/^ City; EDEK :3iFt ^S344 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name 3< lg.C»gKj S~n -T>Na/ Phone (home) -A~1) ~ O Ca ___ Phone (work) 1 - fiSOC» Address: in-PD TP^kJ^'U^I l)A. RD. City:Lft»ia La>>vcg: Zip; SS‘S'5'^ WL Date Property Acquired _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (month/year) I (do) ' also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District UP. I - 6» Present Use of Property ^(kJ6it—E. 1LJ^Residential Other (specify) r>fcj Pi CCcrg>t=n.n~ nwJg -rrt-Aris I DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Z.*7^jQC3Q Describe request in detail: \/A>.gj TT^ Pl^KOt: t4oOSS VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) Other gAOt VA^~^A.vACJE: BAllDSHIPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations; p^m LAjfg &U&.VATICn1 T«C <4':^ g^flk i- ^C-;?rgSL a-rME PLA^eMF MT_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DBSCRIPTIOII OP OIIOSDAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS • w • Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Rp»cmirementa; Ta', Tx- paPs oi=T» LA.K&. ■ja> gi-X>->£.Pi McME-*? >3fe\s/ licMg V'l-L Fi. P'TV4G=-P-, UAt^E ~TV»A»J EXI^'TlJ'ir ---- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form , ^ w.. • 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 15C (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). .. i « 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list or any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. _ _ _ _ _ _ Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _;■ The applicant hereby agrees to prov:Je all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and ^ the informatioA^supplie^ i^true and c^rect to the best of his/her knowledge. /O-27*^^ Applicant's signature ^ y a\SK- - - T\OWNERS SIGNATORB V ■ , , , The owner hereby ackowledg^ and agrees to this authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. ________3333.3 -°-!'- ^ — Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are . . , j third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buil ng Office of this change prior to the meeting. • • • »7 _____ J u“tt' jL LECY CONSTRUCTION, INC. - DESIGNERS i BUILDERS -------------------- 10340 Viking Drive, Suite 105, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ....... (612)944-9499 ---------------------- ooR<iieia. *^*1" I e L.oui A.Kfr:> i-ecv cokIst WooL_t> H-A-We. nrue: >4«iose -tAcVceU PCsNAiwi AKJD KfSV/ ^UtLir* TT4ei Vz^e.i^.KiciH. poiz. Ljo^^nciKi OF TH€: Mew kioMe.- Kk ff j_ '"7 LECY CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 DESIGNERS & BUILDERS 10340 Viking Drive, Suite 105, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ---------— (612)944-9499 —— APPeklbOM, lO V'AFUAMCE. A5s P l4C-A.TIOM: ••• ». —•< MAiL-tUC* UST: VdO^ WtUL-VAVAS Mei2C44^i^T ^ 3 loo ^KlCJ^iWGS-'r dEKllbE. : i . . - , . .*.■!. r i 4* •# ir, . - .■•••! • ■* —• • ' * ... • - mm OATf ia/24/s<9 ftATCH 003 NfMCFIN COUNTY MIOPfRTY IHFOflmTIQN STSTDf mratlY (9tcts LIST tCPORT NO P1%SS4017viWW MNWo»tcx NineTA)0»AYIilNAIC/AOOll SO 00-117-73 12 0001 00000 roNutm od L D OQOO/N A DOOR TRUSTEES LANRCNCf A MARILYN DORR 4SSS NOaOLfXOM* FLINTRIOOt LACANAOA CA 01011 so 00-117-2S 12 0005 01000 TQNRAMA RO R J NOrrMAN ITAL RAYMOND J NOfFMIN 1000 TQNRAMA RO L0r« LAKE m 55354 SO 00-117-2S is 0013 01040 TONRAHA ROR I J OAUMANROBERT J i JOAN C BAUMAN 1040 TQNKANA ROAD LONG LAKE m 55354%RROR ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOBR POOR ADM CROCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOBR SO 00-117-2S IS 0014 01020 TQMUBIA B» JURGEN STIELOH JURGEN STIELON 1020 TIRiCAHA RO LONG LAKE ffi 55354 SO 00-117-2S 24 0002 01015 TGHUMA RO DANIEL C A eim H PARTEN DANIEL C A RUTN M PARTEN 1015 TONRANA RO LONG LAKE m 5S354 SO 00-1I7-2S 11 0015 OlOSO TCMCANA RO MARJORIE F GASCN ROBERT N GASCN 1030 TQNUHA ROAD LONG LAKE m 55354 SO «-lI7-2S 24 i^>4 OOOSO AOORESS UNASSIGNEO 0 P A L A KRUNOEFFER DOUGLAS P KRUNOEFFER 4072 OUANTICO LA PLYHQUTH MN 55444 00>117>21 21 0014 TQIA^AMA ROGAORIEL f JABBOUR GABRIEL E JABDOlNt 21 UNIVERSITY AVE N E NPLS MN 5541S SO 00-117-21 24 0005 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO CARL DIR MARIAN PARTEN CARL OAR MARIAN PARTEN 1025 TONKAHA RO LONG LAKE MN 55354 ] K . ; -I:..?;) G G C G pm» um 0»tCII MtfC TAXPAVER NAIC/A0M TOTAl iATCN MS MM« cf) I CERTIFY THAT TW FACTS REPRESniTEO ARB AH ACCURATE AND ’RUE REPRESENTATICW OF INFORMATION A5 IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE REST OF MY KNONLEBOE AND BELIEF. DATE Jr./ r\ # 14 7 9 1 vr— r. — — REVISION HISTORV:Custom LCl LECY Wcw> |HH) CONSTRUCTION, INC. 10340 VNdngtMvS, Sun* 101, E«MRrNrt«.MN 05344 044-04M SQUARE FOOTAGE DATA: Total FM«»is4SR.Ft_ TatolSi^FL DoUA: yahiLawol Uppar Lovol BaaamonI FinlaRod BMiiwant Total__ Sq. Footago VorUfad: (0 1980 Lacy Conatructien. Inc. .s } • i ^iTufr]' LB\gt"T'f tTi- • • I • « . i « • . I f . « N. f ir j T 1\piicp!‘ .I/ ' ' i >1Rakc, ('1111 I --------------------------------------—' • J—•fc - •.trwrJ"' ^ 1 ^ 1 J1p>'^----rn------ . ^ • r « i . *1 f ■1 f ;i \1 *i , I • ^ • 41 • i• . r I • t !I ' f i ^v'6.. Section 8. Ordinance Section 10.22 is hereby repealed and the following language substituted in its place: Subdivision 1. Lakeshore Setback Regulations. The setback from the shoreline for lakeshore lots: A. Shall be 75 feet for all structures except that on lakeshore lots divided by a major thoroughfare, a lock box not in excess of 20 square feet in area and 48 inches in height is allowed on the lakeshore portion of the lot and requires a building permit from the City. B. No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore nor closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots (Refer to Orono Manual of Design Standards and Specifications) except that this does not apply to structure allowed in subsection A above. Subdivision 2. Lakeshore Hardcover and Land Alteration Regulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures except as permitted under Subdivision 1 of this section. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Within 250 feet to 500 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hardcover. Within 500 feet to 1,000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hardcover. Subdivision 3. Tree Removal Regulations. No live tree within 75 feet of the shoreline with a diameter of six (6) inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the City. Such permits shall be Issued by the City staff provided that at least a like number of replacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable to the staff are planted, any question involving the number of trees to be replaced will require Council approval. C o ex/^-±L 4» Cot.er 34.141. Heiaht. No structure or building shall exceed 2 1/2 stories or 30 feet in height except as provided in Section 38.900. 34.142. Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: ' ^t Area 1/2 acre Side Yard 10 feet Lot Width “100 feet Side Yard Adjacent to Street_ _ _ 15 feet Front Yard 30 feet Rear Yard 30 feet 34.200. Reaulations for "LR-IA LR-lA-1", ‘LR-IB "LR-IC" and "LR-lC-1" Cne Familv Lakeshcre Residential Dis trict. Within any "LR-lA", "LR-lA-1", “LR-1B“, "LR-IC", or "LR-IC-1" One Family Lakeshore Residential District the follow ing regulations shall apply: 34.201. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The set back from the shoreline for lakeshore lots shall be at least 75 feet and no building may be located closer to the shoreline than the average*distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildi.ng8 on adjacent and nearby lots. 34.202. Lakeshore Hard Cover Reaulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hard cover, temporary or permanent structures. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no great er than 25% hard cover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hard cover. Within 500 to 1000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 35% hard cover. 34.203. Tree Removal Regulations. No trees within 75 feet of the shoreline with the diameter of six (6) inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the Council. 34.300. LR-IA; One Family Lakeshore Residential District. Tlii.s iTBSolu^ion wds fiuiopti0ci at thA ^ ?n«5s!^ 5 ay., y \/ A^ . -------------^ Williaffl B^ VanNest*^ M^yor*^ ATTEST: iJaxter'-T^^^enson Clerk/Ajjministrator n I i M houses* Moreover# in hhe pesh# the City Staff has never applied that portion of the zoning ordinance to any develop ment which development takes place on property which is of such a topographical nature that if one applied the sight line restriction literally# that it would result in an absurd location for the house* In this case# if the city were to require that Mrs, Parton construct the house in such a way so that it is no closer than the average distance from the shoreline of the existing residents' buildings on adjacent and nearby lots# it would result in a location of the house many feet further back than 75 feet back from the shoreline which is a requirement of the zoning code and would require a location which would necessitate the removal of several healthy trees on the property and would necessitate a major eimount of excavation in an existing hillside behind the house where it is presently constructed* 14* After having reviewed the application by Mrs. Parton for a variance for the construction of the house# the Planning Commission and City Council approved of same at the July 19# 1976 meeting and the City Council approved of the variance for lot width on June 28, 1976* 15* It is illegal for the City of Orono to expend public funds for the private benefit of Mrs. Gasch# especially when the claim is based only upon the fact that Its* Gasch does not like the location of Mrs* Parton's house. 16* Mrs* Gasch has yet to spend those amounts for which she has filed a claim* 17* Mrs* Gasch has admitted to the City Council that her only complaint was not that her view of the lake was impaired but that Mrs* Parton is now able to view a portion of Mrs* Gasch's property from Mrs* Parton's house* Mrs* parton's ability to view Mrs* Gasch's property from her property is similar to the ability of any other neighbor anywhere in the City of Orono to view the adjoining property* 18* It appears to the City Council that the only prob lem that exists is the problem between neighbors# which problem unfortxxnately they have not been able to resolve and which problem does not involve the City of Orono* 1 The above resolution sets forth those findings of fact made by the City Council at a regular council meeting of April 28# 1977* 4. The City Council has granted a variance to Mrs. Gasch so she could build a fence that she thought was neces sary and the City Council has eliminated the previously pro posed requirement that she plant any shrubs to camouflage that fence. 5. Mrs. Parton's house has been rebuilt on a location that is the same location generally as the prior location of the house and therefore Mrs. Parton had a vested right to construct the house at that location. 6. Mrs. Gasch's house was built subsequent to the original construction of Mrs. Parton’s house and Mrs. Parton is just rebuilding the house on a similar location. 7. The topography of the Parton property and the geography of the properties in the area is such that I^s. Parton's house does not interfere with Mrs. Gasch's view of the lake in front of her house. 8. Mrs. Parton's house is at least 75 feet back from Lake Minnetonka, meeting the requirements of the Department of Natural Resources, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the ordinances of the City of Orono. 9. The present development of Mrs. Parton's property, including the location of che house, does not arbitrarily or unreasonably restrict the use or enjoyment of Mrs. Gasch's property nor does it interfere with the enjoyment of use of other houses in the neighborhood. 10. The location of Mrs. Parton's house is not adverse to the general health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Orono. 11. Mrs. Gasch admitted that she knew when Mrs. Parton commenced the construction of the foundations on her house and yet Mrs. Gasch failed to indicate timely to the city or to Mrs. Parton that she felt that Mrs. Parton's house was being con structed in violation of the ordinances of the City of Orono. 12. Mrs. Parton's house was not built in violation of the building code or the zoning ordinances of the City of Orono but has in fact met all the requirements of same. 13. The City Staff of the City of Orono has determined that Mrs. Parton has constructed the house on a location which meets the provisions of the Orono Zoning Code that provides that a house along the lake shor.id be built in such a way so that it does not interfere with the sight line of adjoining RESOLUTION #780 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST BY MRS. ROBERT H. GASCH, 1030 TONKAWA ROAD, LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA, FOR PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF ORONO OF CERTAIN COSTS tfflEREAS, Mrs. Robert H, Gasch, owner of property on which a house has been constructed at 1030 Tonkawa Road, located in the City of Orono, has submitted a statement of costs to the City of Orono, a cop^ of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, in the total amount of $1,261.80, and WHEREAS, Mrs. Gasch has attempted to justify the request for payment of costs on the basis that allegedly thf City of Orono was at fault for the construction of a house at 1020 Tonkawa Road at a location not greater than 75 feet from the lakeshore, which house replaced an existing house on a similar location, and WHEREAS, Mrs. Gasch has stated that the City of Orono issued a permit for that house in disregard of Ordinance No. 34.201 regulating lakeshore setback of at least 75 feet from the shoreline, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Council have reviewed this natter on several occasions including the request of Mrs. Gasch, • • NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby denies and refuses to pay the statement of costs submitted by Mrs. Gasch for reasons set forth hereinafter: 1. Mrs. Gasch has failed to submit a survey to support her argument that the sight line is such that Mrs. Parton's house, the house next door of which she is complaining, blocks in any way her view of Lake Minnetonka. 2. Mrs. Gasch has argued that there has been a devalue tion of her house because of the location of the Parton house but she has failed to submit any facts to support the alleged devaluation. 3. Mrs. Gasch admitted that she would need to plant the shrubs, for which she is asking payment, along the shared property line with Mrs. Parton anyway because of her prior intent to remove the trees on the boundary. CONTINUED MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL APRIL 27, 1977 Page 8 Mayor Van Nest also noted that the building permit was taken out aLnost a year ago and that Mrs, Gasch could have requested a stop order when she jlt the building was not being constructed properly or within the proper setbacks. Mrs, Gasch stated that she would take thJ^ matter to conciliation co^t if the City did not grant her her wish to be reimbursed for costs incurred to date and for monies to plant trees within the next two weeks. MRS. MARGE GASCH MATTEF (Continued) Henry Muhich, Building a Zoning Administrator, noted that it was very difficult in this case to interpret site line setbacks because of the topography, that the Parten property is on somewhat of a point so that it could never meet a lot setback even if one were applied for. It was noted that the City had tried to make a reasonable decision as to the location of this iiouse and felt that it had done everything in its power to do so. Mayor Van Nest commented t.hat the City does attempt to interpret and apply the ordinances uniformly and fairly. Mayor Van Nest asked Mrs. Gasch if she felt that 'ths requirement to plant trees in order to provide privacy was an economic burden and the City could reconsider the variance and remove the expense of lanting the trees. Mrs. Gasch replied:. That she needed to plant the trees anyway because of her intent to remove other ®®rtain trees anu to fill in certain areas along her lot line to the lake. Welsh moved, Butler seconded, to reconsider the variance for Mrs. Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Welsh moved, Butler seconded, to waive referral of the variance to the Planning Commission. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Welsh moved, Butler seconded, to approve variance for fence waiving condition to plant trees. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to reject the claim submitted by Mrs. Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, in the amount of $1,261.80 and request submit a resolution for Council approval at the May 9, 1977 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Mr. George Johnson, 835 Partenwood Road, noted to the City Council ^at Mrs. Parten built her new home on existing site exactly where the old foundationwas. :ONTINUED MEETING OP THE ORONO COUTJCIL APRIL 27, 1977 Page 7 • • 3. 4. To have access to lamd to the north to use equipnent that is stored in a bam in Medina. To fara the land in Medina, as well as the land to the south in Orono. That there will be no student parking on the land, on the north or the south. The reason for the request is to have access from County Road #6 for agricultural purposes only. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Vo-Tech Crop ProgrM (Continued) and also per the Planning Commission recommendations of April 18, 1977 and instructed staff to submit a resolution for Council review May 9, 1977. Motion, Ayes (3'. • Nays (0). Mrs. Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, stated to the Council that she is requesting reimbursement from the City in the auno'int of $1,261.80 for what I feel ♦■o be reasonable for the loss of my privacy for n.y family si re the new house at 1020 . Tonkawa Road was not built according to the Orono City Building Code. The City of Orono was at fault for the house being built without the proper setback from the lakeshore. I am requesting these costs be paid by the City of Orono or I will take the legal steps necessary to bring to the •^•ourt’s attention the illegal way the building emit was issued to 1020 Tonkawa Road .and the setback violation. This has caused a loss of reasonadsle privacy and peace of mind for ray fcimily. The outline statement of costs are: MRS. M.\RGE GASCH MATTER The variance application fee Property owners list Survey Fence lumber Shrubbery Attorney fees Total $30.00 5.00 172.00 61.52 923.28 70.00 $1,261.80 Mayor Van Nest inforaed Mrs. Gasch that he felt that the City of Orono had acted in good faith in granting a building permit to Mrs. Parten, 1020 Tonkawa Aoad, to construct a new home. The Mayor also noted that there was no survey submitted by Nrs. Gasch to support her argument that the site line was such that part of this property should oe further to the rear. Mayor Van Nest continued oy informing Mrs. Gasch that the Council felt that Jie setback as located was proper. That the City artainly had no ability to expend public monies imply because Mrs. Gasch felt that her property jffered a diminution of value or that she felt hat she had lost some of her privacy.(Continued) city CITYof ORONO J . OF ORONO Oi Iht MartA Short of Lohe MiMotomkm % ♦ « V» », 19H ^ ^ • ' •> i» !•&* • • • • I ^ 1 ♦* '•• ' ,*v «4 # '• ,1^ • % i''^ >|i!S. Lomine P»Tt«> 1020 Tonkawt Road Long Lak«. MiJinMoU OearMn. Parteu • * “ V *tJf 55356 ySmT nT9o Srji5S!al«M (yours and Mn. Casch’s). _ 4 *r «c«t metinis of the CoBrlssionJS^TSitTSit^ »-i the pr^ol 2^ 3^ SSt^SS^ loSier had oaf objectlw to the proposed f-ice. “-! - ”^£!rrc.s? rJS5‘f^°5 ”-'s~iS5 “i^ )*ve to be rwwred at that tlae. • “ ' V ■ ' ■ • * '*' .• - • ^ • • 1 ■ -.■■■>•'.. ■ . •> f'..;': ■•• } s 1 1 , ^ >rT” *>!f^ “ 2:, «;!?si ’eJ^iSsr?f«'S?;4Si’iiS the aatter. 1h«>k you for your cooperation. Sincerely. ^ Henry F. ^tihich Zotiiif AdBinistrator HR4: be iLSLin."SS’n}s:;=,-;ns.-co»««i«i « « «.»««- , . ! * - % - < -» .• • j -• v*^.*.»* ji. i , liil. »t*v' 1 '• ■T'.'fx'f'y. : ■ ' . -.-r / r«i»p r«i»H» ■ i^ !■ ■!<■ RKTil UWCI*] r:iiK^ :nis^ dRONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 14, 1977 Pag« 50 Mayor Van Nest iroved, Welsh seconded, to approve the riprap permit for Allan Pennington, 1991 Eagerness Point Road, per the Planning Connission Minutes of February 7, 1977, Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). RIPRAP PERMIT 1991 Pagerness Point Road (Continued) City Attorney, Bruce Malkerson, discussed the Mrs, Marge Gasch's variance and fence setbac)c structure at 1030 Tonkawa Road, Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the Coxmcil that he had met with Mrs, Gasch and had discussed the matter with her concerning her concerns with Mrs, Parten, Dick Benson informed the Council that he requested Mrs, Gasch to try to resolve her differences with Mrs, Parten and report back to him at a later date. VARIAIJCE 1030 Tonkawa Road #199 Mrs, Robert Gasch Mayor Van Nest requested that the Length of Council Meetings item on the agenda be tabled until the next regular meeting of February 28, 1977, Mayor Van Nest moved, Massengale seconded, that the Length of Council Meetings item be tabled -until February 28, 1977, Motion, Ayes (4) - •Nays (0), LENGTH OF COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Van Nest discussed the Things To Do item on the agenda that Council should direct their attention to and informed the City Council that he does want to continue developing a list of problems and issues and policies that they should be addressing themselves to in the future and that these items will be discussed throughout the following Council meetings. THINGS TO DO Mayor Brad Van Nest discussed with the City Council thoughts on sending a letter to Mr. John Bolemd, Chairman of the Metropolitan Council, requesting some input from their staff at our CouncM meetings in the future to review 2md dis .jss policies that are affecting the Lake Minnetonxa area. Mayor Van Nest stated that he would draft a letter to Mr. Boland stating this request. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Dick Benson, City Administrator, stated that Mr. Arthur Nickolas was retained by the City of Orono, Orono School District, Mound School District, and Orono and Mound Hockey Boosters to initiate an ice arena study for the Mound and Orono areas encompassed by the West Hennepin County area. ICE ARENA (Continued) # • Ni ■tH (• r - o*' ‘• i• K VTfc\r r • • • r • • • % • %• •• \ •• -! •V'i* " - .* * • * • »i ‘^•••* • iV*i • ^ * « « . ^ * ------------- . ,•> V»J.-^'-I TR/VCT 'e. -r \^ :'t J ' >! % • t. % >'J •i%\-r f.: >: •i n\A so r\AT -H— ^ I T^.r-vv. , rcv' V • ^ • •.• *• #4 • •▼?ir ’ .'V jOi'"! _•........ 1--1 rfl ? ^ ^IS*#* I / !I C <•>4f >C*U . ' f $ ! 5 wt ? C 5 2 r * '•'* * " ' ^ I 5 "• I I r J f • (M I I » ^ f { I M i: I £ s f ^ o K (4 *• .'V t^0T€. EK\S>m'*3 m •'-».« • • ^"0 M 4 t r ;-i' • • if ! h»rct7 ctrtlfy that tu> alov* It • tm« u4 ctrrtct plat • f ■ turt*}' ef Traet •!• ««ct*ttrtd lead Sunrtr #617 IcfuttpU CcGBt>‘. Slutrota, Md thivt tbtrt art ae tecreaehDtatt fnm tr 9t 99iS iRtttl t>ctpt »a aottd. rjnr«7td Igr at ttdt lOth digr af Aprtl IJ76. / C. telMadal M ■■■' ■>m NlaaaMU laftatratloa #3fJ| V, s It#*' •t.*'*•« «» «a* « •* • * • •• •»'C • f OCTi*»^i*v«»nr>wAT^<^ uoiivar ■_ t rv*>v^‘*^ Of. !§• %C»af OiM’Ott. '5t%!lM t p.» t%, vi> A V .r 0 - V^•(ko t^_l~^ ^ yN B ^ «^lfc*UK»e- >IU'C 4<% CC**TI*J ►f^’T- —_^-^5- .^..- J-^- 4 .4, . ■. ____rr^'^ - iT--------------------: — - f rlncJOT or G L K7L B.D D O O S ^ \ M i^: I------ 4 ^ r*ti%- !. tTpon»r * • . V>itfti< pr V. alu ;t CTt\^. *••.•»• 1, *f» f ir; s- _• . --• »• • »M I :> * ; . |‘ 5 • V i-* 1 Moiryi tu.ifz-QP I*, oflrr toiuT /»» <Ct »•“ -<•'» W. tv*f PO0T»*-’» U' LU ft i<*cn fO<- tvKittMlf -.TK-fl tc li^C -V u)»V!- Tc n» ►' 'T. •«*'. V D O W S ’^•y ■«-•«»-W •»_ .-^. ^»}1^ii •» _ 2'iyx^ _ Zo^^o Zo"'/J- .-. .. <a>^^ - n/v-r __«*■ /&o ^T Sa.» .• yoft ' /oro .-.'__/?<30 C- r- •'•’ ? ' i iofi » (iX/STTW C. !!?52^ •^?1/IX II k«4 « II ^" \ iV:,-.- I! 41______ '7r-2’ro f/eofc>Z£t^ ;^>^3Y <tr%Yrls’ ,"'V==^'’--C*A<. 10Vi2_ i,t.a ^ Z~i- -><- Teocyf^c^^ 3C. , <T74» si; F«ooaT &y/iT 2>u-A'; • / i-o a */r VS 2-SVt20 ^ a»xo , <^io xir >f\/o»o^ ______ — ~ % ^7'' ''^ f LA® 1 •; /7 r 2/.C3 X 4^ y ^ - ^ . - >X / '’P|P«Po:»J^ CAM Avt?l5*r ‘2.!T2o aAj r4c..^ MMiMlMi I HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (ciscLE cne )/§-7^ 75*250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Harsccve ^ in Zone '"*-'^ A. House 3. Garage c. D riyeviay D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ D eck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other LENGTH X X - X WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S t F • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B O B '^^OO X 100 O % I HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET >y Li •j . B. Garage c. D riveway - • "> X K X >. m /I /c D. S idewalk ' o X X X * J n - E. Patio / 3eck U IIJ X y X 51 boc c - L4 <A^^J XL X S.F. , < S.F. \ S.F. ^ S.F. S.F. fOOO^'r. S.F. S.F. S.F. La ^Lf AREAS UNDERLAIN ^ ^ ^ _ RY hULL -uivyt s S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X .S.F. X * M/a S.F. G. Other i-5 x /4 = 2.1 S.F. ^ fUt.CAyrrZj Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. Total Property Area in Zone 11.^OO S.F. 43z^ V fTL_LIt^££_ X100 - 24.1 % trts /4 To*Planning Coiratiiaaion Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Coomisalon Members City Administrator Bernhardson Dates Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator November 16, 1909 Subject: #1480 Ed and Gerta Toth, 725 Old Crystal Bay Road S - Vacation of Drainage Easements/Variance - Public Hearing Xoniag District - LR-IA, Single family lakeshore residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application - Request for vacation and rededication of drainage easements. Applicants also require a 1* side setback variance for construction of proposed deck. List of Bxhibita Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit P - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Survey Survey with Staff Notations Staff Sketch of Deck Location Staff's Letter to Applicant 10/27/89 Copy of Farview Plat Showing Drainage Easements Letter to David Nitz 4/3/87 Re: Conditions of Building Permit Approval Pertinent Pacts - 1. The plat of Farview was approved in 1977 under the current 2“acre zoning standards. Lot 12, Block 1, 725 Old Crystal Bay Road South was platted as a buildable 2 acre lot, with approximately 43% of the 2.0 acre lot area covered by drainage easements. The intent of those easements was to contain a detention ponding, taking drainage from Lots 2 and 3, Block 3 and Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 1, and detaining storm drainage for a period before allowing it to drain to the neighboring properties to the south. 2. Along the south side of Lots 11 and 12, a wider drainage easement was dedicated for the purpose of containing a swale to direct water towards the pond at the southeast corner of Lot 12, Approximately the southeast 1/4 of Lot 12 was covered by a widened drainage easement over this ponding area. A 50'x200' drainage easement along the slope adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road was taken for drainage purposes, although that portion of easement does not coincide with the drainage patterns historically occuring on the property. Zoning File #1460 November 16r 1989 Page 2 of 3 3. 4. 5. 6. In January 1987, David Nit* applied for a permit to construct a new single family residence on Lot 12. After much ado (see April 3, 1987 letter) a building permit was issued for a residence which met all required setbacks, did not encroach on any of the easements, and for which primary and alternate drainfield sit-iS were tested and approved. Nit* was allowed to regrade in the area of the detention ponding area and was approved to revise the berm and use it for his driveway, maintaining the ponding capabilities. This residence was issued a certificate of occupancy in August of 1988. Late in 1983, Mr. Nitz was given permission and granted a land alteration permit for driveway revisions to construct a new driveway access to Farview Lane. That driveway construction is complete, however, the Public Works Department has granted temporary approval for continued use of the Old Crystal Bay Road driveway until the new owners, Mr. 6 Mrs. Toth, have verified that the Farview driveway is functional during the winter. Mr. & Mrs. Toth are in the process of completing landscaping on the property, and also wish to extend the deck at the south side of the house. During staff t.'view of the p .rmit application ^or the deck, it was determined that the deck would en":roach into the drainage easement. The Toths were advised to request a vacation of portions of that drainage easement, and it was noted by staff that the same suggestion had been made to Mr. Nitz in 1987, but he chose not to pursue it at that time. As a result of the survey completed for the vacation request, it was also determined that the house had been placed a few Inches closer to the lot line than originally proposed, and due to the angle of the house, the proposed deck would encroach approximately 11" into the 30' required side setback. The applicants request a variance for this proposed encroachment. City Engineer Glenn Cook has reviewed this property on a number of occasions, and is in concurrence with staff that the partial vacation of drainage easements on this property, in conjunction with some other rededications, is entirely appropriate. The applicants have been issued permits to regrade the swale at the south end of the property to be further from the rear of the house, but still directing drainage to the detention area just north of the old Crystal Bay Road driveway entrance. Zoning File #1480 November 16, 1989 Page 3 of 3 Discussion •* Mr. Mitz was advised early on that the drainage easements could become a concern for future additions to the house, and that the City would likely approve revisions of those easements to more acurately reflect existing drainage patterns. Staff is in support of the requested vacations. Please refer to Exhibit E for a depiction of City Engineer Glenn Cook's suggested easement revisions. Regarding the proposed variance for the deck, note that applicant has been working with staff to avoid conflict with the existing septic tanks which are near the proposed deck. The 0.9' side setback encroachment is a result of the angle of the house in .elation to the west lot line. The proposed deck continues the west line of the existing house and will have little visual impact on the neighboring properties. The alternative to the variance would be to cut back the proposed deck addition by a few inches but that would leave a jog in the deck area. Staff Recomiendatlon - Staff recommends approval of the vacation and rededication of drainage easements as depicted in Exhibit E, conditioned on applicants' surveyor providing legal descriptions for the appropriate vacations and rededications. (Appplicants* surveyor should work with staff regarding these descriptions.) Staff would also recommend approval of a 0.9' side setback variance to allow construction of the proposed deck, conditioned on the encroaching portions of that deck never being enclosed above or below the deck platform. CITY OP OROMO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICA' PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address D\A &Ly #llB 0 S53^ I Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) - f fH - 2.^_ _ _3 ^_OOO ^ Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICANT h^rlix. Name Y lury-^rus Address I (<- Him n Phone In ^ _Phone (work) City ~P/ u yv^cu>.lt^ Zip_ _ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name EiA t ^erAt\- Vot^A Phone (home) Phone Address~V^LFS C>\ci City Yiri Zip I Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - Renewal Fee - 1/2 Current Fee After-the-Fact Fee $100.00 a) $150.00 b) $150.00 c) $250.00 d) $200.00 f) Residential accessory Use CITY OF OROf^O ■ ■ uR"i T 1J. W V'vvv^^a V j. ‘.♦w.'V 1 c Y • Institutional (church, school, etc.)^"^!;'''. WWX *\vi I X" fc- r 07Duplex Credit/Bldg Commercial/Indus tr; Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Gradi’ig and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 $250.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT DSE OP PROPERTYu(x uac ur rxursKxx / t A Present Zoning District f r\ Present Use of Property _ _ _ _ _ _X Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST De^scrlbe request in de^il: (iAavr\aA^ il/TK) •f- A a ^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. Plat Map. . 6. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Applicaticn is complete. Zoning Officials Signature __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's signature Date /Q OWNERS SIGNATURE * u The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of, this request. Owner's signature ___________ Date ~ B --------- Applicant must haye all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. iOT a «JN DATE 10/EA/S9 BATCH 091 HE»CHIN COUMTY P«0««TY IMfOHmTlON SYSrtH PROKRTY <»f«RS LIST REPOST NO. PI-«15A01 PAGE 10»9CR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOSv?<SO OA-117-23 34 COOZ02879 FARVIEM LAM a J NA8CRERMvmN B a JANICE N HAMRER2879 FARVIEH LANELONO LAKE m 55354 58 04-117-25 54 000500725 OLD CRYSTAL RAY RO SOAVIO A NITZDAVIO A a KAREN 0 MITZ725 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO “NAYZATA m 55591 58 04-1X7-23 34 000502820 FARVIEH LA T N HOMARO ACS HOHARO THOmS N a CHERYL S HOHARO 2820 FAIRVIEH LA Lac LAKE MN 55354sa 0A-117-ES 14 0004PtGP AOM 8E880 FARVIEH LAOMCR NAtC J F KEHP a L HDVOTHEY-KEHPTAXPAYIRJEROME F REMP1.NAME/AOOR ESOO FARVIEM LA5 •LONS LAKE »84 &S3S4iC'sa 04-117-n 41 0002PROP AOOR 02745 FOX STQNNIR HAHi V 0 ROLM a L E ROUX•n TAXRAYfll YVES 0 ROUX _f-i_ HAMi/AOOR 2745 FOK ST HAYZATA IM S5391 38 04-117-Z3 43 0014 AOOII 02770 RAIHEY RO • ^OltCR NATC RICHARD K HYSOCKI ETAL TAXPAYiR RICHARD a APRIL HYSOCKI HANE/Anm 2770 RAINEY RD c NAYZAYA m 55191 sa 09-117-21 21 0001 -PROP ADOR 00825 OLD CRYSTAL SAY RO ^V‘ i CRRCR HAHE CLARA C •YHAN TAXPAYER CLARA C LYNAN NAME/AOOR 825 OLD CRYSTAL SAY RO HAYZATA MN 55191 t-’ o a* 58 04-117-25 54 000702905 FOX STHARK F EHSERSETSON ET ALMARK a CAROL ENCERRETSON2905 FOX STLONS LAKE MN ‘:S554 30 04-117-23 34 001002927 FARVIEH LA R 6 0 SACHSE A H P SACHSE RICHARD a KARYLYNNE SACHSE 2927 FARVIEH LANE LOB LAKE HN 5555450 04-117-25 45 000800820 OLD CRYSTAL RAY ROCAR HUST6E0RCE A HUST 820 OLD CRYSTAL RAY RO HAYZATA FM 55591 38 04-117-23 43 001202725 RAlNCY RO RAINEY HANNAH ANDERSON RATIFY HAttFAH ANOERSOI 138 GROVE LAIS TER MPLS FtF 55405 CO■■ -y 38 04-117-23 45 0017 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED TREES TO 8E PRIVATE RO ASSOC TREES TO 8E PRIVATE RO ASSOC 156 GROVELAND TER MPLS FM 55405 58 09-117-23 12 0001 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO GAR HUST GEORGE A HUST 820 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA l«F 55591 =4: TOTAL 8ATCH 001 00013 I ' i i^^ficoviue c*r<tf7r. •.,or SniCV€T CA«h-»/^6 /^oMse /s ’s«*mEV.v€WA*fiv^nixj. CO. ‘CMt.vr**riee?At>(z*/V"Qc>t-t> A^ocuLVpcr ^£Tj6.VAmofJ^ /AiVe^TJ 0TX1^ f^*2^/AjAo^toA^ TO f><«aorw" sin?5 /Ai rO^JUAJCTTOO U>1TM S^T7Cy^><^AjA<3«AlAcy TO t)p \>/ZM^rte^tk sir^s. pAei«ivF /4tT; Si^TTC ^ttW (^ ho(4Aft> SiirBiy\ - ^—^^fv^iJkbgr BA^/A>. ciAiyetn^ uA>t»< pAfi^^AV OaI ^fiVATTO^Ji • « . • * I •Ju 1C Al>f^O*^Al*> I^rHA-rXfHMir'er \______ f^Jd^i / V*/^-j ;a>c/€as^ a as Hect ’ssA^ TKAr B l^ A>t> /2*'f 2.0 i^i^» ^ItL >^A TO Clt^ATIf <?rfAA/A»Cl4Z.«?0 PiWIioA^ A*r '*C** Page 4 April 3, 1987 Note that the penalty fee is assessed because excavation was comnenced without a permit. Note that the Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) is no longer assessed to rural properties where municipal sewer is not provided. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Sincerelyf _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Michael P. GaffrorT/ Assistant Plannifig t Zoning Administrator AKNOWLEDGEMENT STATEMENT: I, David Nitz. acknowledge and agree to comply with tha terms and conditions of building pormit approval as stated in this letter. Signature attz sketch MPG/pp Date f ' & « i? i. • Page 4 April 3, 1987 th& oenaltv fee is assessed because excavation was co^eJceS without . permit. Note that the Charge (SAC) is no longer assessed to rural properties where municipal sewer is not provided. Please contact sie at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Sincerely* Michael P. Gaffrorr/ .Assistant Plannifig i Zoning Administrator att: sketch MPG/pp b Page 3 April 3, 1987 4. Access ~ the access approved by Hennepin County is to the south of the power pole per the sketch attached. THIS ACCESS MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF BASEMENT EXCAVATION. THE EXISTING BERM MAY BE USED NEITHER AS A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS NOR A PERMANENT ACCESS. Provide the proper culvert as Hennepin County permit requires. 5. The City cannot allow you to place any struc* .es (other than driveway) on any portion of the drainage easements on your property. As we have discussed, the drainage easements do not reflect the actual drainage patterns on the lot. The City will be pleased entertain any formal applcation for re-defining those .asements into a more suitable configuration if you so desire. Finally, you should be aware that Bollig & Sons commenced excavation on your property without the required permits on March 27, 1987. The City stopped that work and ordered the excavator to restore the site to original grades, which he did. We were further concerned to find that he had placed some fill over the south end of the primary drainfield site, and further that he was not aware that the house was to be 15* further south th..n staked. Our reasons for squaring the excavation to be restored were: a) no permit on file; b) excavation in the wrong location for the house as approved; c) if for some reason a permit was not issued we would have no leverage in getting the site restored; and d) since your excavator noted that the neighbors attorney's were looking at the site earlier in the day, if in fact the neighbors filed an injunction and stopped the work prior to issuance of a permit, it might be many months before the situation is resolved, and we could not allow a hazardous excavation to be in place for an indefinite period. The City has no obligation to enforce the covenants of the Farview Association, and our actions to date have proceeded independently of any action they may be taking. We find that under the conditions noted above, your application generally meets the City requirements for obtaining a building permit for the property. Therefore, a building permit will be issued upon your acknowledgment of and agreement to comply with the conditions noted in 1. through 5. above. Permit fee is as follows: Building Permit $ 720.50 State Fee 107.50 Plan Review 468.33 Investigation Fee (Penalty) 720.50 TOTAL $2,016.83 Page 2 April 3, 1987 b) Once the mound is completed, fill and grading must take place that will channel the runoff from the north to go around the base of the mound at least 20' easterly of the toe of the sand bed. I will be happy to work with your septic contractor and site grading contractor so they understand what is required. c) The alternate site which is an area between 10' and 40' from your west line and about 70' long running north-south, must not be filled or disturbed in any way that might make it unsuitable for future use. d) Prior to excavation for the basement, you must rope or fence off the primary drainfield site and inform your excavator of its location so that it remains undisturbed during construction. We will provide you with "Keep Off Drainfield" signs if you request them. 3. Site Grading and Drainage - as we have discussed, certain measures will be required in order to preserve the drainage system which was constructed as part of the Farview subdivision, as follows; a) A storage basin of 5000 cubic feet must be provided just north of the berm/culvert near the southeast corner ot the lot. The contours and elevations shown in the grading sketch you submitted appear to adequately provide that required storage. You may wish to move the pond even further south given the driveway location approved by Hennepin County. If so, the existing culvert and berm may be removed and replaced with similarly elevated driveway berm and culvert as shown on the attached sketch. b) The swale that currently crosses Lot 11 and discharges to your basin area must be maintained; you may regrade so that it swings further out from your house if need be, but it must still provide a positive downward grade to your basin. To accomplish this, you may or may not have to put a culvert under your driveway, depending on the driveway elevation at that point. c) Again, as part of the protection of the septic system, fill must be placed east of the septic system and we recommend the drainage past: the system be channelized to make sure it flows to *:he basin you are creating. ^. .- .- . r. «h -'.--IV-^CITYof ORONO Poat Office Bom 66«Cnf«*al Bay, MinneeoU 55323 •Mankapal Office* On the Sorth Shore of Lake Minnetonka April 3, 1987 David Nitz 950 Red Sandstone Road #41 Vail, Colorado 81658 RE: Building Permit for Proposed Residence at 2811 Farview Dear Mr. Nitz, We have completed a zoning review, drainage concerns for your proposed residence at 2811 Farvie Lane, based on the information you submitted. In addition, we have completed the building plan review for your project. Your proposal is approved under the following conditions which you must agree to and acknowledge in writing before the permit will be issued: 1. House location - as we have discussed, it is necessary to relocate the house 15’ to the south in order to create a suitable setback distance between your house and septic system. Although we agreed earlier that this accomplished without an additional staking, 1 now note that your excavator (who started the «*cavation without your having obtained the permit, to be discussed below) was not aware of this change when he started. Given the apparent lack of communication between you and your subcontractors, we will now require that the ^^a'^ised house location be staked and certified by your surveyor before the permit is issued. 2. Septic concerns - as we have discussed, the septic as proposed by Gary Rathbur, is suitable specific grading measures as follows (see sketch attached). a) The mound system shall be installed placement of any fill northerly of the house. If yo“ intend to raise the grade in your front (north) yard so that it would exceed the normal of cover ovei the rock bed of the mound, then ycu r.ust avoid thit by placing a greater depth of sane’ under tlie rock as we have discussed, so that not more than 12 of cover is over the rock bed. BUILDING A ZONING - 473-7357 assessing administration a finance - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473*7359 o<L^ so^ •t JviAf'Jrw^ 4 cui'^et?X~ ..Av A, :■■•. ;<>.'A* nvs-VK>ijerft:^^H:,,:t;', ■ David Nitz, 725 South Old Crystal Bay Road {jovenbar 15, 1988 Rage 2 of 2 7. The old driveway access oust be removed after the new driveway is complete but prior to grading contractor leaving the site. 8. The new driveway entrance must have a 20' flat apron back from the edge of the paved portion of Farview Lane, to provide a safe access to this driveway. 9. The new driveway entrance on Farview Lane oust be set at least 100' west of the center line of County Road 84. 10. Upon completion of the new driveway, your legal address will change to 2811 Farview Lane. Any changes to the plan as outlined above must be approved by the City. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. I cannot stress the importance of making sure the grading contractor and all equipment operators are aware of the need to not disturb drainfield areas. Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/tln Enclosure cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director Mark E. Bemhardson, City Administrator Bollig & Sons, Inc., 11401 Cty Rd 3, Minnetonka MN 55343 A\ A CITY OF ORONa CITY of OROXO pMt Offic* Boa 66 • Cry*ul Bay, MinnatoU 55323 • Manirififtl OCBcw On the Xorth Shore of Lake Minnetonka Koveaher 15, 1988 David Nit2 725 South Old Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 He: Proposed Driveway Chance Dear Mr. Nitz: Public Works Director, John Gerhardson, and I have reviewed vour proposal to construct a new driveway to Farview Lane. proposal appears to be acceptable and meets the minimum standards for setbacks from septic systems, intersections, etc. The following are conditions of City approval of this driveway change: 1. A grading permit must be obtained by your grading contractor prior to commencement of driveway construction. That permit will cost $50.50. 2. The driveway shall be approximately 12' in width as staked by the owner. 3. Follow the route as staked by the owner. DO HOT DO ANY GRADING OOTSIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY AREA. KEEP ALL TRAFFIC OFF HOUND AREA AND ALTERNATE DRAINFIELD SITE AREAS. (The attached sketch indicates areas which are critical to remain undisturbed.) 4. Do not disturb slopes at northeast corner of lot. This may also be a future potential drainfield site# but will be ruined for such use if it gets any traffic. 5. As you propose, the driveway can be constructed at grade so that the need for a culvert may be eliminated in the northwest quadrant of the property. However, there is a possibility that this will lead to a wet driveway and you may wish to install a culvert anyway# 6. At the southeast corner of the property, eliminate the driveway access to County Road 84 by grading the shoulder back to its approximate original grade. However, you must leave a berm and the culvert in place to maintain the required drainage control. Remove gravel from the driveway and add black dirt i7-i.73<a • publicworks'UILDING a ZONING - 47J.73S7 • ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE - 473-7358 • rWBLiv. assessing I'Jt . .. J• J V . ^ -I ^i (U3.'4^ , J • . • * *•I... ... ! .&'j •. ^ ■•' • c.'- A'i i •:vi ■ ii'H- ■» t 4«-ir:-; *; .. 1 i| ; .,i v. •5 •’ji . >sc*» £c«ou^^ J • ♦• t '4pf/:r7<NJi* heAft^AtCi-eLlAJAM PV^la ^ ^t>e^ /^>-ii-07 'P1S dPo5^ F/mA^ FARVIlW LANE 2^TTS }^ji SCALE 1* SO* LOWER LEVEL ELEV. lOai S£»T/C SrST£M srr BACK Dr^ Fl^lJ I ktrtlir * ctrtifr Ifcit tiia i«rv«T« •r r«* pvrt ww fTwptrwd by m9 m wmim my £rtd f«p*msi«« 9w4 ti«t 1 i« M imfy . Umd Svrrc^ isd^ tkc U«s «f tk« ititf •f MlABCMta. STBCAK-ROSCOE-FAUSCH. INC • !• 232.96 N83^l2')/if ■ TO ' j ---------------------------------1 „ ,. I I O Karla Selseth Re: 725 Old Crystal Bay Rd October 27, 1989 Page 3 of 3 2. The footing work would be permitted on superstructure could be built until such time that the easements are vacated by the City Council. The applicant takes a risk that, should the easements ultimately no allowed to be vacated, the footings would have to be removed. A aradlng permit for the minor work necessary to direct the dralnagi .outh of the house could “>• your grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have further questions regarding the application or permitting processing. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator cc/ Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Senior Building Inspector h Karla Selseth R«: 725 Old Crystal Bay Rd October 27, 1989 Page 2 of 3 4. While at the site, 1 commented that the driveway appeared to be elevated near the base of the existing sewage treatment mound system, such that water would pond behind the driveway. I noted that this would be detrimental to the effective functioning of the septic system, and should be revised. Note that in my letter to Mr. Nitz dated 11/15/88 the driveway was supposed to be constructed at grade, and Mr. Nitz did not want to install a cul^’-ert. However, that approval did not anticipate that the iveway would leave an area where ponding could oc<"”*. adjacent to the drainfield, and the fact is such a situation could affect the septic system adversely. Because there was a question during our discussion as to the pre-existing location of the drainageway, I overlayed the center line of the pre-existing drainageway onto the "proposed driveway" sketch. It would appear that drainage today is not significantly changed from the original, except that the driveway is above grade and apparently will cause ponding. Your options would appear to be: A) Raise the grade between the mound and the driveway so that run-off from the northwest flows across the driveway instead of ponding; or B) Put a culvert underneath the driveway so that ponding will not occur; or C) Lower the driveway. In order to best protect the septic system with the least disruption to existing improvements I would recommend adding some fill west of the driveway, which would move northward the location at which overland flow crosses the driveway. As we discussed, your application for the easement vacation and revisions should be submitted by noon on Friday, October 27, 1989. Survey work and grading and drainage plans could be submitted early in the week of October 30th if necessary, but no later than November 3rd. Upon receipt of your application for the drainage easement vacations, we could issue a permit for the deck footings and grade-level patio work provided that the following conditions are met: 1. A final deck plan has been submitted and received approval of the Building Inspector and meets all zoning setbacks. i 'i I" J CITY of ORONO Pom OfRc* Box 6S*CrysUl Boy. Miancoote 55323 • Munidpa] Officoo On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 27, 1989 Karla Selseth Dundee Nursery 16800 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55446 Re: 725 Old Crystal Bay Road Dear Ms. Selseth: This letter is to follow-up our discussions or October 23, 1989 at the above referenced property. I believe the following will summarize those discussions: 1. Exhibit A attached is a copy of the record plat, showin^g pre-existing drainage easements. Also, a pre-existing 10 utility easement is adjacent to the north lot line. 2. Exhibit B indicates the proposed final drainage easements as indicated by City Engineer Glenn Cook. A 50'x200' existing portion of drainage easement leading from the existing 18" culvert under Farview to the widened easement in the southeast quadrant, would be required. Also, a 25' easement would be added, leading from the northwest corner of the property towards the southeast quadrant as shown. Additionally, a portion of the existing drainage easement directly south of the house would be vacated, leaving a 25 easement along the south lot line. 3. In conjunction with your application for vacation and rededication of drainage easements, the City will require that you submit a grading plan showing pre-existing and proposed grades along the southerly lot line. You must that the required swale leaving across the property from the west will continue to discharge to the pond area north or the Old Crystal Bay Road driveway. This provides the necessary retention of run-off prior to its leaving ^«e property. This was required as part of the original subdivision of Farview. Bt’lLDING k ZONING - 473-73J7 ASSESSING administration a finance - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 I I T o.Y 1 t ■ uj ^ST !f,oT L>^-^€T 4X4 • TRCA1E0 PCr.y»Y ‘^riV'*•* «^ s!i^i!"te^r/..1 m CAMto »««.OUNDEE landscape company■V^Vf CD & CERDA TQTH___DATC »-?0-WM* 9t ten ApnRF.^? 725 gp C^YST4L bay RO S %t}^\It* CCD««OCXHffiGlanding —3: SOFT LANDING--22' floor RiU nc »r tmS'DCSICNCR ka PLA ^ A SfLSt^hOia {^_ph<>C.ornct;Plan Ir ziV~JP.CONCPETEPAD \\ POTCNTILLA ‘\FROM FRONT ------CLUTCHABLE RAIL--3C.',^2X6 CAPRED PAIL--82’ r *v. >r^ ’•ff...... •••'%• SEPTIC > TANK / 225 -.OFT. r^^‘7. ' 'V*M 2<4 CEDAR DECKING--300 > J.FT / EK, / V-/' ^ ^2X8 JOIST 16 ” tVJTREATED .40) 2X8 RIM JOIST /f $m7(iK . w - . »i2l E^.lS’illo PATIO BOULDER AND SMALL DERM SCALE 1-4' ^ '•'••■* ‘ t . • ••• ■A ■ ■ 2-2X10 beam - deck floor I'-im - -A' '-•TREATED Po ' I S 4'-; Froa: Dates Planning Coiaraission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commiasion Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 13» 1989 7 Subjects Proposed 1990 Schedule of City Meetings Please review the City Clerk's memo and proposed schedule of meetings. The Planning Commission is asked to formally act on the official schedule at your November meeting. The Council will be expected to formally act on this schedule at their December 11» 1989 meeting. Once again, we have scheduled a December meeting for the third Monday, but based on activity level of land use applications, staff will cancel the December meeting if that activity level is low. The Decemoer 18, 1989 meeting of the Planning Commission has been cancelled, your November 20, 1989 meeting will be your last meeting of the year. Please note the first meeting in your 1990 schedule will be Tuesday, January 16, 1990. Staff will once again ask that members contact the Building 6 Zoning office if you are unable to attend scheduled meetings. 102689.1 TO: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Ad.Tiinistrator FROM: Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk DATS: October 26, 1989 SUBJECT: proposed 1990 City Meeting Schedule Attached is a preliminary 1990 meeting schedule. Shown at this Attacnea is a p holidays, precinct caucus day, school time are the Vg primary^and General Election days. December as has been done in the past. ’^rS'lld oTthe^Brd "uVsdV'y^becruse^ o^Mon^ Monday. first Tuesday is General Election day. PROPOSED1990 ORONO CITY IHTING SCHEDULE C3 7;00 P.M. Council Meeting 2nd 4 4th Monday7:00 P.M. Planning Conunission 3rd Monday^ (May through October 1st Monday as an alteinate date)Park Coininission 1st TuesdayX Official HolidayJanuary S M T 14 W (5)17 16 19 20 21 gj 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 W310 T411 1990 F S 5 6 12 13 May S M T W ^ A 2 6^ B 9 13®il|l6 20S> ^23 27 Mm 1990 F S 4 11 18 25 5 12 19 2G 1990Fol)»u?»iy S M T W r10 15 1990 F S March29 16 4 7 13 14 ^2! 22 23 20 \Pgg.C.lKtCT m 310 17 24 Juno S M T W T 7 14 S.t«r>0«riv»AR»C.VSC.T iO*J 3 O) A 6 lOllil 12 13 17 QB» 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 20 29 30 1990 F S 1 2 8 9 15 16 July 1990 S M T W T F S 1 C2)AX 5 6 7 8 C9( 10 11 12 13 14 15 <16) 17 10 19 20 21 22 123 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 31 April 1990S M T W T F S 1 2 A 4 5 6 7 8 !2]ia 11 12 13 14 15 jra 17 18 19 20 21 22I2S 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 August 1990 3 M T W T F S ^ A ^ 2 3 4 5 CS>A 8 9 10 11 125^14 15 16 17 10 19 <2(^21 22 23 24 25 26^20 29 30 31 September S M T W T 1990 Octolier •'■rOcj'MikRN E.tec.T(QN M T W 3 9 10 _ 16 17 22)23 24 29 30 31 T 4 11 10 1990 F S 5 6 12 13 19 20 25 26 27 November 1990 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 7 0 9 10 11 H13ll1 15 16 17 10 (£9)20^1 24 25 2® 27 20 29 30 CCC>Jt Sk(.Et S.CTIQNbPi'l December S M T W 5 6 13 1990 F S 1 7 8 14 15 2 3 A 993 11 12 lOqpiO 19 20 21 22 23 24 X 26 27 20 29 30 31 • COUNTY ROAD NO. 84 1 N0V-2B89 W V UJ I LiJ Cs^ _ SOUTH ------311.0*-------<$' •DRAINAGE EASEMENT >c \ O' SWALE VS.I4 SOUTH r=4o' o DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION ASSUMED BEARING SYSTEM ASSUMED VERTICAL DATUM 11^\„ vJ-*/ _K.__ BENCHMARK; TOP OF GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION 100.72 LEGAL DESCRIPTION *1.10 LOT 12. BLOCK 1, FARVIEW, HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA STRGAR ROSCOB-FAUSCH. INC. amiHJLTINU EWUNKK» ■ LAND XUHVEmail CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ED TOTH BOOK NO. 2H. PAGE NO. 72 COMM. NO. 0811211 ! h*r<by ictliiy that this sur««y. plan, or re port wai prepared by i; or nnder my direct lupereiiion and Liat I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State Oate_/A.-3iTA9--Reg. PLAT OF SURVEY FOR: LECY CONSTRUCTION DENOTES mON MONU^.t.NV EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I am a duly registered land surveyor under Minnesota Statutes^Section 326.02 to 326.16. < ' Reqlitratlon No. .3? Revised //*3-89 nrioye Hou^e, T1“P Hansen Thorp J_* -I D^iinAn nic/MiPellinen Olson Inc. exH, $UR.ve?^-^AieTcH Fofi^ 1^1 Cp e,u>u.pej^'^ryyAfi.. ^^Asct* fe. Af>r>e^ p?ft. pgjtspg<iTH/^^ - ^Hcco/^)C. 4.ocati<=>'^ -r«A=rex/s7-isJb Pil40|2. "to c /2^i /Vr /OZO 7^>^J^£:-<V<AJA. >,.vr C» >(Pfi£-ir7<o ; - Stfo»oA* WmM .rtl® M ii';iilteis^ «i 1^ MF' % W’^z ¥m^ *i m^mBif«^ II y T«|m 'm-im »ii mmm _J Ai'>’'^ '^'.V ; . ••. \. '';V:;,- V' ^8«)^^^^-,ft;!5ftAr;'OiMM!^ V^vv;: ■>>,;.■'V".'. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR DAVID M. PRASS IN LOTS 6-12, LINDEN BEACH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA yj y[\ LEGAL PESCBiPTlOWt That part of Lota Ten (10), Eleven (11) and Twelve (12), “Lindt-n Beach,“ described as follows: 0o9innm9 .it the Southwest corner of aaid I#ot Ten (I0)j thence East along the South line of aald lot, a dlatance of Eighty-four (84) feet; thence Northwesterly along a line, which would Intersect the North line of Lot Twelve (12) at a point One Hundred Eighty-five (185) feet Bast of the Northwest corner of aaid Lot Twelve (12), to a point in said Northwesterly line, which is fifty-two (52) feet southeasterly measured along aaid line from the North line of Lot Twelve (12); thence West parallel with the North line of Lot Twelve 112) to the West line of said Lot; thence Southeasterly along the Westerly line of Lots 12, 11 and 10the Westerly line of Lots 12, ii and iQ to tne poin beginning, including one-half (1/2) of Linden Lane, adjoining said lots; according to the plat thereof and of record in the office of the Register of Deed and for Hennepin County, Hinneaota.ALSO vacated, m file Oeeds in (8), and Nine (9), Linden thereof on file and of record er of Deeds in and for Hennepin Lots Six (6), Seven (7), EigI Beach, according to the plat in the office of the Regist County, Minnesota. NOTE: Because, of conflicts with .idjoining plats, and lack of mention of ownership of the rest of adjoining vacated Linden Lane, the owner is advised thst some aprt of legal action to clarify the situation may be required. I hereby certify thit this survey was prepared • by me or under my olrect suiiervislon and that T an a duly Registered Land Surveyor under thd laws of the Stale of Minnesota. COFFIN 4 GRONBERC, INC. Hark S. Cronberg MN. Lie. Ho. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long I..ikc, Minnesota 471-4141 Scale: l inch » 20 fe«?t Date : November 6, 1989 • ; Iron marJier found o : Iron naikcr set Bearings shown are based upon assumed datum pH7;iS2 ’-0°^ Certificate of Survey for Don Belauski z-:>yzs> of part of Lot 16, "Coffee's Addition to Shadywood" Hennepin County, Minnesota :> X Ttm . = // 2-- <Saa. X.O.I r^2-0,\ r </05 - Uao t 2'-3 ,^4 ■ij<1 •-I LEGAL DESCRIPTION:p-ViAt^ SttOuJAy The South 50.00 feet of Lot 16, "Coffee's Addition to Shadywood' 7 ? - 2-«t> zro '50©' ^ S £0 /S^ - 9/00 0 .z-s-x^/oo rj:. I4^. AuLouoeJ:^ B^vnHC* o-1T'(j^ ti€-d.fe. Z'^XfoM 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor und,* • the laws of the State of Minnesota. COFFIN S GRONBERG, INC. ^ 111.*- .aS^ oP Mark S. Gronberg MN. Lie. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Perc^ Scale; 1 inch Date 2-9.2 /.Vx v.'J ?.f 9.8 7*X>’S.*7 ; Ac /«» */ *r 2-3- = 20 feet r 1 tr /I /pro f/CpPoSi^Si* -yS-'Z-SO 2*/xz^/ * E7(^ Pu«M 2.0X10 - yo-0 2-^0 /O -a<3o 2-ArTi. j. " ■ ‘2.^^8jjfZAri^iipr -2.J --V" October 3, 1989 Iron marker ■»3 -«* ;/&3 .A vr-- • • ~ -------------- f. —■.-.-i* r-.A-rr; " 1 Certificate of Survey for Don Belawski of part of Lot 16, "Coffee's Addition to Shadywood' Hennepin County, Minnesota r '/•i j £4 , i |5 ”j- fi 2 ^ $ 4 t \6 237.3t. ^r \ 1-- r t / ----- (z'^€idd ' 1 rPrrr /«.76 •b LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The South 50.00 feet of Lot 16, "Coffee's Addition to Shadywood' I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by rae or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. COFFIN S GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg MN. lie. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Scale: 1 inch = 20 feet Date : October 3. 1989 0 : Iron marker' a AW 4 S 01 5 1/2 SEC. !0. T. I 17. R. 23 ORONO —38 r^mmmam:asm: • v--!**'-- • . ■ ..r-...;v. •—../.i • - .•- .. iivti I. Fiuaii County Survtycr Htfwtpw County, Mnii. 10 3 » a::" H?usr _[^yg?^oAJ r—n.-i) li! Ilil! z<_J CL Oa oO DC) <5q:<ox g -. S'.. ? 2. o y “2 s ^1 9 II < .££ C^ 4A f UJ £ O 56 £Q ^ - Vc 7=/^-.-'*^'- ^ ''Ay-/3 STAi=r's. pz&c'Atrv ^rr- iZ. lU s ^ Hr.C . 0'-C.a. |(VJ © L^v^feivoro^I usaro ^.Ai r^rc At i •'- ^oA ffZOP03AU Ki^W PRDPDS e«sr^ ^ ■ \ '* \ • • *V"'v n I UE.W I s-^ t,'?D +(>’.’^A'^ • + U3-J - : ^ +- r It''-' '■->*• <-'«• •' 3 g) «lX52_/j, ■}-r.‘f x-21. (^ NOi~^ 6/n luo so (Q^vjo-r^ : TV': i-1-i ;: vzs/i-^ ■2-''^ 7 ,-n L-7-:^c>yZ> = IU° V^OO £-•»' t lovi/^ r 3,0 -> (^ }(^ yi( - \l c. (g) 6x/’ 7& ^ ^ (£> |Ay^'7 ' 7-S5> ^ ‘ ,oi 6)1'7 "- ^ (J) (p l£>y:i-A‘ 1^® 7^5^^ ^■P, 7 3 5T - ‘/S'7 ' A S7 2. T.'-fizK7, T?rA.u ‘/3T^/£.4a= f;A,.^ -V ^2- :r^' ' -S' 3}3 “^ s.-f. ^z_ /Aj -vc-zso ' • ^ ^.* ,. r,-..-,.jt ...4-^ SfCC-tRC , S^iT" ^:^ .^''J^.v•\■ .-.” .v'-i?'■: - i-h»y^ otijyi-s /9-7S^ygf^ 937^':-^\l'-l'*«:i^':-A'1';" -7s-z5o' j '• ,'?J4^-Tr g-oiT^r/J^^o f^l}^9>/ij Wu 7^ /^^i>fT70AjS 'I »0) 2rJ .- S)II(P ll . 3 >-7S;9 =■ '2''^'^^'(T) ^/V-2. ■(P ■2(.5 ’’'7.3r - ‘^,^'2.(g) e>>*n.2- '•^ 2S.‘/ r 7.0 ' ns (g) 4>V«»/tu D^cfS zs s^- . /Mfi; 7' X 30* *• 7tO s X. (?> - gc.v © /V^^O 8C.V /lf<? -piAt- 7^'iSO' -sX I sirris-s?©* 3.3.2. •/• <7-7S'l 7X30 = 210 ZS-x<l/i, ^ M3 TOTA.t- 0-?S ’'*r^7^ 571 =:/4.»0O ?3,4*/o ;1 : :| :<« J ■‘^f; ps; . ,, E-- ■- ■■■•■ - i' -ai-teirv-;' '# ..%: -X 1 •• ■ m ^ p- • f t ';€P' /9&*^ ^A*oV/AtCS - • /aJ &ArHi6oO‘*A. Cl^ - /07 si. l4lC. /W li/MrtTt MtA ^ Of i>oKrlC.V(. ± f^ sJe./S ^~7^'-30/^ “ STTiucr^vt^ gva»e^ &usn^G Pecjc H-Jl. /a> "^r-iTO' A#-li O-^S"’ - 5ic>gvoAu^s '^or ftt&tousL'^ sno^o fn W.C. A'OUJ A-S Lf/0 /hi “7S-i-^' “D/yt'^A*Y t^snhJG 7'Zf'er) i irJOr^ /POM ^ t^or C/>0 s^. AS /OoTeJS /AJ /hHncAgroh^ -rwAr' D£jU(?voAy /yvir^AjCicii cn/vucs" ^ TW'f^ rti^e' I Rwu w:..w.f«r(0^,-®): ^'7S-': -► /8» »#. ssa*) 4^. 59<) T/t>,geo »3.S'><, 75'2^0 ^ 5052. •*• zeH + 89 + I^IO » SSiSi] <53S^T ;s«70 = 3G.S 7* rs? rrril -TWiiiu H.C . /Oor»o //u iZifsoclf^y .1 © fine ‘ ' • ri'%^ |2e“t- ItSiC. V <}-^«■S7 jo.. ^ — I V ^«vio;|o>r... i ::^-v \ • & 4> V •'V \ \N ’■••.•• •:■■••' ■.:.--'_..Tv;; K •\''liP \ -..■7 t--- ■.V ■ '%-• 'C^c 4; .. V A- \ w 3-v ■V / 1 r 'is iSt-IS r •J:ss !> • ^ 7 ' J< Ai# o ?6 rnuc DiumM 1. 7t00 p.n. PUmiHG COHMISSIOH HEBTIW: , aOVSIBBt 20, 1989 7l00 P.K. HKMI ROW SOOIS - CUOHCll, OfflHMBtH COOKII, BBPUSnmTITB - Edward Callahan Bchadulnd pub 2. 11289 Robart Hill, #1475 John McDowell, 4045, 4105 4 4135 Bayaida Rd - Preliminary Subdiviaion Review of thaae iteme will hearinga. eence between 115 Old Cryatal Bay Rd H - Preliminary Subdiviaion - Review of Amended Plan - Renotification by Mall Gerald McCourtney, 1055 Ferndale Road Heat - Variancee - Continuation of Public Hearing ney, After-the-Pact Conditional Uae Parmit/Variance - Public Hearing Dan t Ruth Parten, 4300 Bayalde Road - Preliminary Subdiviaion - Continuation of Public Bearing Dave Carlaon, 1960 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Dae Permit - Public Bearing Jacquelynn Kelly, 2056 Shadywood Road - After-the-fact Varlancea - Public Bearing Continued to January 16, 1990 Planning Comniasion Meeting Donald Belawakl, 1695 Concordia Street - Variance - Public Hearing David 4 Suzanne Praaa, 1065 Linden Lane - Variance - Public Hearing Dr. Bob Hhlteael of Vineyard of the Lake Inc., 850 Heat Hayzata Boulevard - Conditional Dae Permit - Public Rearing - Applicant has requested thia application be withdrawn. Robert Ritchie, 3572 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Dae Permlt/Commercial Site Plan - Public Bearing Doug Hilliama 4 Lacy Construction Inc., 1020 Tonkawa Rd - Varlancea - Public Hearing Ed 4 Gerta Toth, 725 Old Crystal Bay Rd S - Vacation of Drainage Easements - Public Hearing 17. Approval of 1990 Schedule of City Meetings juniTianL mm lid ng, the been cancel! er Institute, 2S00 badywood Road 20 e Approval of Planning Conniseion Minutes of October 16, 1989. 21» Planning Conmission to select a representative to attend the December 11, 1989 Council Meeting. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BAYSIDE WOODS SCALE W FEET OWNER-DEVELOPER DAN & RUTH PARTEN 1015 TONKAWA ROAD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 TOTAL AREA s 17.06 Acres I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by etc or under my supervision and that I am a duly registered land surveyor under Minnesota Statutes Section 326.02 to 326.1statutes section Aiia.uA to ^ ReqiHrelion No. Dai.: 9 TIT?0 Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc. Con.ulllng Engln.tr. h Lind Surveyor. 7565 Oltic. Ridge Circle Eden Prilrle. MN $5344-3644 (612) 629-0700 Sheet 1 of 2 Sheet* \ 7"*^ J SITE LOCATION 0 100 zoo 300 scale in feet 2’, 3'■ z'14'-'i 1. / 6" CL 5 AGCRECM TYPICAL ROAD SECTION BAYSIDE WOODS REV jwA T"!”? Hansen Thorp -I Pellinen Olson Inc. I ' Con»uHir>g Engineers & Land !-urveycrt 75«S Office Ridge Circle Eden F>ralrie. UN S5344-3644 (6121 829-0?00 Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets LEGAL Dt^'LLlPI ION INFORHA1ION INQUIRY CODE I ROF ERTY ID 0.’ i :?3 1? ''OV'C fAGF \ F5C C HEX! =^CH DST 277 W IRS'!ID 3 SUR DST IFI ROJACREAGEEARLItSI DEI. TOO 1R OWNER LEAH RACKNLRPROP ADDR 3C ADDRESS UNASSIGNEDlAXPAY N/A DAVID PRASS1774 ERI HUNT AVE S HPLS MN ^>^403ADEN • UNDI N DFACH*.('<)MUNIC 3B PLAT 42440 PARCEL 4000 DIV STATUSI AS I STAT CHG VERF LEGALCO<'Dr!f : . . LOT 003 DLOIK ..pREVl'iMS OUilERAPF RUX F aRCLL Sli'E MAM' f'AII .METES / POUNDS DESCRIPTION INCL ADJ li.2 OF VAC LANE aODN DATE FILED 10/20/Un n , ■ f » I lO LEGAL DErrCRIFTlOM INFORMATION INQUIRY CODE 103 T'RnF'ERTY ID 07 1 17 23 13 00*?7SCH Di-T 277 urRi'IID 3 ^WR D5I IFFROJ S EARLIEST DEL INI! VR ACREAGE gOOWNER LEAH RACKNERPROP ADDR lOtj LINDEN LAlAXPAY N/A DAVID M PRASS1774 FREMUiJT AV S MPLS MN 1-5403 PAGE 1 PSC C NEXT »MUM1C 38 PLAT 42440 PARCEL 3500 MV SI AIMSI ASI Slf.1 ( MG VERF LFGAIi .......... lOT 00 7 HULKH;FVIOUS OWNERADDN •LINDEN Eff A( H*Af FROX PARCEL SIZE IF AN DA ICS .--J METES /' tuUilDS DtiCKlPIliJN INCL ADJ 1&2 OF VAC LANE ADDN DAIE FILED 10/2*0/1711 CD n n I------rr ir ^ •J ' ij •• h .■—---------------------------------------------------------