Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-06-1989 Planning Packetmrnnmwm bm:- ■.■ v N.';;^ ■'V ’ y'f f- 'r V..:;. vU-- •: : •. ■ • = ‘^' '• • • ^ " s.; V' *'r • ,• •:• :•:; ;• -4-; ' ■ mll#'rjlfc'.^,;.'<»■■■ !■■•■- • ;■iiiM «aa mmmy v/^V:";. r,' i“i'^-iL-'4i^'^''l^h^-.iv'- ■ *,...?!• •' "-■' ■■■, i;-; - :rwmmm&j3' Tr^.--; ;■■■■,■'■..,V:h "■ ■•'Vr:. •". ... <1 : ■ ■'h: ,' ■PUBLIC ATTENDANCECITY OF ORONO Lf\hJtJlt^ (^MEETING DATE wmrfs ■:iiHa-*,-j- • • PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1- y^r/r .ViT y}fAiJJ^j9^k Jt^ o yM/y// 2. //Cv-v/fy^/V 7/(^M/'yj... /fj. 3.*l‘t4J' \U^S Arthoirri' /4zl /Mi-/' 6. iiARlS El>imT?t=>S rZ! a/i^T A Uf J'h^/ A’/vP 5 4. 8. AuJLL'^ /^iMip I%1H L(- 9 • /i ^ L^a/^jL .IgSO Jinfrjljjjri ,0. CL//^.tXi-A 1 0 ? LJi^141/ \ ,1. ,2. • 3. 4. • 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. v.A-'.' *;•(Wmm i‘K: . y ' ''■y'-y< . ••MrSfiiiiiMi yrm -N «C^ •JV^ vvV/: Av:‘-v:f %sfl__ . -: r.-l i. ■* *. v * /-=:, it. •' •• ■•mmiismlm'^ PRESENT FOR (from agenda) >u~ _ _«Jc A?*iHMr f 1 A ^ T l^s~l U' i l>4l/ '■^r'v!^V . • f • '. = *;'■■ ■ S’:’>-Q':;::v;.'.v--r- •: :-:. i-^:.--:-r- .• .^ ^ m "'^V^yl^''-;, '"jM- *1 ^mmm _ ^ i; ■•■■■: ■ ^?SHiiR*>;. ^> kyy*?:: •*•>;• . ; . ^ *PLAHNIIIG COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 7:00 P.M.1275 BROMI ROM) SOOTB - OXINCILR;;i COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE -ATTENDANCEPUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 8:00 pjn. #1411 Sussex Square Development, 3020 Fox St.- Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing ACTION ITEMS Review of these items will commence between scheduled public hearings. Pler>se note meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. 2, #1441 Don Copley, 1185 Tonkawa Road - Variance - Public Hearing 3. #1443 John Skoglund, 1840 Fox Street - Variance - Public Hearing 4. #1445 Gregory Peterson, 1355 Arbor Street - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing 5. #1446 Jack Yost, 1515 Green Trees Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing 6. #1447 Lakeview Golf Course, 710 North Shore Drive West Conditional Use Permit ~ Public Hearing 7. #1449 Michael Pirich, 2224 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Hearing 8. #1450 Ward Edwards, 2474 Carman Street - Renewal Variance ~ Public Hearing 9. #1451 George & Theresa Bloom, 1374 Rest Point Road Variance - Public Hearing ADDITIONAL ITEMS 10. Approval of Planning Commission Minutes of August 21, 1989 11. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the September 25, 1989 Council Meeting. 1/ • r. W>rr:: s- : • :/• • ■ '■ ’ • ••.•■•• ;EBTIHG 7:00 P.M. HIm ‘ V , .V-•;'■ *: .V ' • • )pment, 3020 Pox St.- ;ontlnuatlon of Public commence between scheduled s at 7:00 p.m Street - ;e - Public Hearing >ad - :e - Public Hearing jh Shore Drive West Lc Hearing 1 Road - Bet - ring Rest Point Road - tes of August 21, 1989 presentative to attend the Planning Conmission Chariman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonJeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator September 1, 1989SUBJECT: #1411 Sussex Square Development, 3020 Pox Street - Preliminary Subdivision — Continuation of Public Hearing - Re-notification Review of Aa»nded Plat List of Exhibits Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit K L M N O P Q R S T U V Exhibit W Exhibit X Exhibit y Lot Configuration Re-notification Dixon Letter 6/27/89 Lawton Letter 6/28/89 Planning Commission Action Notice Alan Carlson Letter 6/8/88 Lanier Letter 2/25/57 Letter From Adjacent Land Owners Planning Commission Minutes 6/19/89 Memo to Gerhardson Cook Report 8/30/89 Gaffron Report Plus Septic Map 3060 Fox Street Septic Map and Inspection Reports Drainage/Watersheds Grading/Erosion Control/Engineering Plans For Road Revised Preliminary Plat •I.: ,•»>. • ..f 1 4 mi- ■ / ■ «iim PM The revised plan consists of 17 two acre plus lots. Each lot now meets the required lot width at the rear of the 50 foot front yard setback line. Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 meet the required lot width adjacent to Fox Street. Lots have adequate frontage along Pox Street but the City will require access from the private road. No new curb cuts will be approved except those approved from Interior access roads. Note Lot 1, Block 2 has adequate width along Leaf Street side and the private read extension to Leaf Street along the north lot line. Lot 6, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 3 also meet the required lot widths adjacent to the road Outlot, (Outlot A). Each lot satisifies the two acre dry contiguous steuidard for the rural zone. "■ ■ /-a:^r % k m iiii® mmm Urnm m warn Ife/liii *? it'. f ! • ’i M mmi M i...; '; r.L;V.Vi-•: r>:'^ •h... •.;••= ri;- - V T. V»,- pas \ i ■m f. • .••.. .y-.v' I y- ■■■: '■. ,'■ ■ vvltea MMj Administrator3020 Pox Street - 1 of Public Hearing 1 Notice Owners 13 6/19/89 : Map ) and Inspection igineering Plans Lots. Each lot now the 50 foot front t the required lot ate frontage along from the private tpt those approved >ck 2 has adequate road extension to Block 1 and Lot 1« jacent to the road the two acre dry *J * ■ • ■ • ' • ‘ • 'L . ■ V •• ••••Vi/ -^ my • • •-. : vi'V; •■ •Zoning File #1411 Septe^er 1# 1989 Page 2 of 9Roads/Patnre AccmssThe Interior plat road has been <"esigned as a through road. Outlot B will be developed connecting to Leaf Street. There shall be a stop sign at the intersection of Outlot C and Outlot B in order to discourage speeders that may use this road as a bypass. If Planning Commission feels it more appropriate Outlot B can be redesignated as a continuation of Outlot C and the cul- de-sac be redesignated as Outlot B. This will discourage any critics of the plat from assuming the City would have to grant a length variance for the plat road. Outlot A has been repositioned to north exiting now to a dry area and away from the wetlands to the south and east. Future access to the south of the major wetland on the east side of the property was (jiscouragcd bacausa it would b© too clos© to th© Fox Str©©t roadway. The roads have all been platted at the required 50 foot width with 100 foot diameter cul-de-sacs. Please review the road plans Exhibits Y. The road shall be designed per Urban Road profile 28 foot minimum paved width to the inside edges of the curbing. Curbs and gutters will be provided. The applicant will be responsible for selecting three road names one for the maj r thru road and two for the cul-de-sac roadways. Please refer to your earlier exhibits in your packet for your June meeting that showed the ownership patterns of the properties to the ®^st. Note also that the plat road has been moved 26 feet from the wetland along the east side of the property. wetlands/Matershed There are five basic watersheds to Exhibit W. Unfortunately we Planning Commission's review, availalbe at your meeting. Mr. present the drainage plans for members may have. that maUce up the property. Refer do not have a large size map for but a larger scaled copy will be Gronberg will also be present to the plat and answer any questions Watershed 1 as shown on your map in southwest corner of the property predominately drains to the west via an open drainage way thrcxi'jh the Stellow Addition and out to Stubbs at the 967 elevation along the south side of the pond inhibits drainage up to 967 elevation overflow drains to the culvert in the southwest corner and then eventually to Maxwell Bay. Drainage from the roadway based on the design and grade at tne curve of the road brings water to the southwest corner culvert also. I am told by property owner to the south that drainage design creates erosion problems on his property. Stars has asked Mr. Gronberg if the use of that culvert could be discontinued and what the impact would be on the drainage to the west. Mark Gronberg said that filling would be necessary to provide the re-channelization of the collection area now to the northern culvert. The request was feasible and could be considered. i'L: ' ■ W 'V j fe’g'-v 'gv;;V If ^ 4-' mm mm -r;v„i V. -q‘ ■ ■' X ^ i- ■. '--gyv/v : '''V' vg ^ 'A. ;g-.j -mmm. mm mm *v m M:: Piw9 m s a through road, af Street. There :lot C and Outlot B le this road as a appropriate Outlot Lot C and the cul- 11 discourage any Ld have to grant a tlot A has been I and away from the ss to the south of ;he property was bo the Fox Street le required 50 foot ise review the road ed per Urban Road islde edges of the The applicant will one for the ma;; ‘r . Please refer to June meeting that ties to the east. 1 26 feet from the » property. Refer ,arge size map for aled copy will be ilso be present to jwer any questions It corner of the an open drainage dbbs Bay. A berm he pond inhibits 0 the culvert in :o Maxwell Bay. and grade at the b corner culvert south that this property. Staff ulvert could be 1 drainage to the be necessary to I area now to the Le and could be ISMim•-'v.mmWMimMV' ■- -.-Imm m-M-: ii?' mm M • '-.r llIKi"m«ii:w-mmi r;-\m "ft PP I ,sJ-- ii 'ihm■,4vv k;-\; ■m .r%- ! J ■J i9 X mymmm Ljfev' ,'■ ■ ;*v •■ >■;. mmmmm • ^■■■■. *: , ■■■'.• , ■ ■ ■'•'V ^L ; 3 ■■■••••. w.:■ •3'.‘.'‘'■ v.■fe;-' ..4m' - ' y .•-m. m• .■*;• *• .•Zoning Pi3e #1411 September 1, 1989 Page 3 of 9Area 2 to our northwest requires the Installation of a retention pond in the corner. Storm sewers take run-off from the roadway along the shared lot lines of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 to the retention area.Area 3 in the mid-north portion of the property drains as staff thought predominately to the south and eventually to the large retention area on the east border. Major drainage easements will be retained by the City between the shared lot lines of Lots 4 and 5, Block 1. Note that applicant has also shown the required 26 foot setback from the edges of the wetlands at the 975 elevation. At the street intersections drainage is taken via a storm sewer with an outlet to the retention pond to the east. Drainage from Area 3 eventually drains int^ the watershed along Old Crystal lay Road and eventaully to French Lake over grassed swal^'l yards and underground iralnage pipes. Area 4 drains to a retention area to the in >ediate north of the "exception" in the plat via an underground t ,le to Area 5, which eventually drains to Farview plat and eventually to Maxwell Bay. All retention ponds have baffels with controls on outlets review Exhibit X for details. Each retention pond has been defined at the flood elevation, rather than the normal high water mark. The applicant's engineer has also provided information on minimum basement elevations for Lots affected by the retention areas The City will acquire conservation and flowage easements over all retention areas defined as drainage easements and in addition the City will ask for drainage easements over the drainage ways and storm sewers (located out of road right-of-ways) protecting integrity of the drainage system within the development. Grading/Brosion Control/Landscaping Typical sections of the road and the silt fence detail are provided in Exhibit X. Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 will be filled to raise the building sites. All other lots will remain undisturbed. The only alterations proposed on this property will be the installation of the roads and the filling of Lots 2 and 3. It should also be noted that the septic areas within those two lots should be staked before heavy equipment is allowed to enter site. The City Engineer has reviewed the grading plans and has conceptually approved them. I have also been advised by Mr. Gronberg that he will be able to demonstrate the minimal removal of trees as a result of these excavations. In addition he will provide a landscape plan that provides plantings along the roadway of Fox Street and Leaf Street. In relation to other properties that have been subdivided in the City, this property has minimal tree coverage. Plc.ining Commission members may wish additional plantings within interior of property. If Planning Commission concurs, staff will work with the applicant to provide additional plantings along the interior plat road. fit*'! it* 'C: ■■ :V wm mmm. mm,.. • - - - Vd’: : I; . , X? ■I ■ ‘f.** - . . I m:my ^vv', ■:./. iiaiii-i>n of a retention from the roadway Block 1 to the drains as staff id eventually to Major drainage 1 the shared lot llcant has also I of the wetlands t intersections outlet to the ea 3 eventually 1 £ay Road and al<*-1 yards and ate north of the to Area 5f which to Maxwell Bay. 1 outlets review been defined at water mark. The tion on minimum retention areas, sements over all in addition the rainage ways and lys) protecting opment. nee detail are .1 be filled to i will remain i this property lling of Lots 2 c areas within 1^ equipment is ( reviewed ^:.he n. I have also to demonstrate le excavations, that provides )af Street. In divided in the ge. Fleming within interior will work with ig the interior mm mimm ■ r..' 'l-• . ' w•. . •• • .•.. . mmmmMrn Mmm ■ I' . ■ ‘WvVi^ Wmmmm ai" ‘^v. ^.■ ^w i.6. * . iyf i: Kl i’* ■ fee 9' mm:\ '■ '•: fcv j ■; ^ ?. >;:v::h:.:< - • f'^m: i 'mm.k - :«;C W- ^mJi'>■■1 K-.'-,';:.mm■■it mm Av.i . v\- ■ •■' ' ■:>v • •:■"•-• ; f C:?:l " V-7:/r: m m K. *■ f? • % .! :•.iiifra iia :•■ . ■ ws: :.- ',i-y ^vv: ^ zoning Pile #1411 September Ir 1989 Page 4 of 9SepticGaffron's report confirms that all lots have been tested and have been found to have suitable areas for on-site sewage treatment systemsr both primary and alternate sites. As with most of our rural subdivlslonsr the majority of lots will require mound septic systems. The septic report calls for snow fence staking of the following lots prior to road construction or land alteration creating detention ponds: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Block 1, Lots 1, 4, 6, 7f Block 2, Lot 2, Block 3. Snow fencing must be installed 20 feet from the boundaries of each dralnfield system. Staff has discussed the process of staking with the on-site septic evaluator and he has agreed to provide an employee to do the necessary stadcing if the applicant wishes him to do so. Drainage Rq>ort The City Engineer has reviewed the final drainage summarys submitted by applicant's engineer, review Exhibit T. The actual drainage summary is lengthy if any member cares to review it at the City offices, it is available for your review. Staff will have it at the meeting for further comment. Cook finds the report acceptable and recommends approval subject to the Watershed's final comments. I have talked with Ron Quanbeck who is responsible for the review of this application at the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Mr. Quanbeck has been unable to review the additional information submitted by applicant's engineer and will be unable to provide final review comments by your meeting as he will be on vacation. He reviewed some of the first concerns that the Watershed District had at the first review, it would appear in view of the drainage plan submitted by applicant that these may have already been addressed. It is my understanding that Glenn Cook has also been in contact with Mr. Quanbeck. Cook's only concern in the report is that the pond in Lot 3, Block 2 has no outlet below the County Road elevations. This condition would exist today in the undeveloped state as this pond is an overflow from drainage that comes from the south side of Pox Street. In two back to back 100 year storms, with no defined outlet to the south and the higher elevations op the south side, the roadway would now flood. Cook advises that because the City would now have public drainage easements over the retention areas that the roadway could be pumped into either the retention areas in Area 1 or Area 5. (review Exhibit W) The formal review by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will be finalized in the third week of September. The plat will not be scheduled for Council action until staff has reviewed the final comments from the Watershed District. ispte-- V- '.'i ■ •; ■ ■*' ,r .• -..Cj P •: ^ ■ mrMM ' ' . •* • • * *. Zoning Fil« #1411 September 1, 1989 Page 5 of 9Additional Staff CoHaentsGeneral IssnesPlease review Exhibit R the Planning Commission minutes that note many of the concerns of the adjacent neighbor that attended the public hearing on June 19. Many of these issues have been addressed above by staff. In regard to the questions of wildlife habitats staff would suggest that the existing ponding areas will be protected and that the wetlands in Area 4 or the eastern wetland detention area in Area 3 can be altered with the appropriate permits from the City to encourage wildlife habitat. Staff has met out on the site with applicant's engineer and on­ site evaluator and performed the necessary borings to confirm the soils type and profile of the specific wetlands on the property. As previously noted seme of the wetland areas have been created by informal underground drainage tile systems installed by the farmers who farmed the land. The wetland to the mid-north and the southwest are classified as protected wetland areas. All wetland areas will function as detention ponds. The City would prefer leaving the protected wetlands in their natural state. (Area I and Area III northern wetland) In regard to the question of lawn fertalizers from the proposed 17 lots being detrimental to the quality of run-off to the lake, staff has advised the applicants consultant to contact the D.S. Soils Office to questions the staff Limhologist for conunent on the degree of pollution from residential lawns as compared to an agricultural farm field. Mr. Gronberg will provide that information at our meeting. Staff CcBiments Specific Issues Please review Exhibit M. Remember at your last meeting the Lawtons questioned the defined boundry line along the northeast side that runs approximately 143.82 feet along their west boundary. Gronberg notes the old Auditor's Subdivisions provided no surveying out in the field. It was a matter of merely creating a legal description to define a property's boundaries. Whenever we deal with properties created by Auditor's Subivisions we find major descrepencles in the boundry lines. We have advised the applicant's consultant that this issue must be resolved prior to final plat approval. The City Attorney's has confirmed that the preliminary approval does not have to be held up because of this issue. Mr. Gronberg and the developer will resolve this matter with the Lawtons prior to final plat approval. If Planning Commission members want more detail as to how this can be resolved staff will happy to respond at the meeting. ; ‘ mmm wm-mwmm M- .1 -V •ft. :iiiWi I'.:’ i-H:m s s:*' 'xmxmn mmmm'V. mm-■yvm r '• .W 0®ilmmn. i #• * .%• .-•• • V^-»j£ f V C . ■ -VvV. r V ■ • , ^ m.- J:' : I- : r; y::/ymmy mymym,y :;v-- /-vv.; ZorSeEPacPl< Its 6 ] cor on."th la> the duz and Dia sta tha onl res Cit inc sur rai est thi was wit Pis sub Unf pro; per pre no app wel ado opt mem res: adv mor stai soi Eroi ele- is 1 pom thii ■Kau;-'' mmm: . ••• • • •. • • I minutes that note that attended the Issues have been stlons of wildlife ponding areas will 4 or the easterr iltered with the wildlife habitat, engineer and on- ngs to confirm the s on the property, have been creat^ Installed by the bhe mid-north and tland areas. All I. The City would ir natural state. from the proposed i-off to the lake^ 0 contact the U.S. for comment on as compared to an 11 provide that last meeting the 9ng the northeast long their west ivisions provided tatter of merely trty's boundaries. 1 by Auditor's oundry lines. We lis issue must be City Attorney's ral does not have ironberg and the Lawtons prior to lembers want more happy to respond .T- f ■Mnt"mm L.X.mmm.:■m-m.mmr.f f V, :;;v - V- ¥f A'-* fir. ^ -.v- • '•:■•:-v -■ Tt-.l t - T-4 - > J .- - J ^•:m mmm': ir"^; • fa.mmmmy: •vW--: V -:Jmm-4 :> - m4 1' n;«IM■ ■■mm m c- I--.:Kmft,mm ^mmmrny............... ^■ V • : ^ V- wmrnBmmh k-T- - . ■if ,-;.,..- k^tc^ l&v , S:i-'' fc' C "1^ ^7-' mm iiiii ,ri . **»'-' >■.- • •• :3.s4 i •■m '1‘ f- p^m ■ -S-- *• .•\-.--:-y .--v mm . mmmm-i%miAy mmmm:-Zoning Pile #1411 September 1, 1989 Page 6 of 9Please review Exhibit L, the Dixon letter dated June 26r 1989 It«ns 1 through 6. Staff feels that Items 1 through 3 and 5 and 6 have been answered by either staff or the applicant's consultant. The issue raised in Item 4 deserves to be expanded on. Many of the neighbors have expressed the same concern "this has been a very dry period for the last few years and the laUce level is down 3 to 4 inches and is the developer providing the appropriate drainage plan that can address drainage needs during wet years". Calculations provided in the drainage plan and in the drainage calculations submitted for the Watershed District and the City Engineer's office deal with established standards for areas at defined flood periods. Please note that the drainage plan where detention ponds are defined show not only the normal water elevation but a flood elevation. It is the responsibility of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City per its flood plain and wetlands ordinances to insure that increased run-off resulting from development will not impact the surrounding existing development with flooding during heaving rains. The guidelines for such drainage reports are standards established by Federal and State authorities and agencies. In this specific review the 100 year and 1 year phenomena format was addressed. The proposed drainage plan will clearly function without a negative impact in wetter years. Please refer to Exhibit Q. A group of concerned neighbors have submitted a 15 lot plat drafted by BRW fr' consideration. Unfortunatelyr the City staff has no author: uy to review the proposal as the current cwnei of the property h.is not given staff permission. A representative of the neighbors may clearly present this proposal to the developer, but once again staff has no authority to address this proposal under the review of application #1411 Sussex Square Development. The neighbors are welcome to contact the developer and if the developer wishes to adopt any of the elements of the plan, that is the developers option. As to the second issue, staff must once again remind members we are not dealing with an LR District, this is a rural residential subdivision and hardcover is not a consideration. I advised the neighbors that very often the larger lots receive more intense development. Staff does not understand the statement that claims this area is particularily sensitive to soil erosion and run-off because of the ponds and low areas. Erosion usually teJces place where there are extreme variations in elevations. This is predominatly a moderate to flat area that is under consideration for development. The presence of ponds or ponding areas does not suggest erosion problems. I think the third issue has been addressed by staff and the applicant. yy:.- -y. It yyy-mmm i I ■ mi "rmm. m:m-yV.'m ’umijrj ’-m..U.: -'-it*' iteiii 6mJy- m- '.:^0S^4y y .: . ■ '•''nv-■. ■V---. ^ .• ■ J :H;='■m:rnMmm rn-m i^;J:<---.-y:mMMmBm'-:,id June 26, 1989 ough 3 and 5 and he applicant's 8 to be expanded tie same concern w years and the eloper providing drainage needs tie drainage plan r the Watershed ith established Please note defined show not ition. It is the District and the i to insure that 1 not impact the during heaving :s are standards id agencies. In enomena format clearly function neighbors have consideration. f to review the not given staff rs may clearly again staff has the review of le neighbors are iloper wishes to the developers ce again remind this is a rural onsideration. I er lots receive inderstand the ly sensitive to and low areas, ne variations in flat area that ince of ponds or as. I think the applicant. ......... ■■ :.... - = Wm0m v'.v.- v = -^:;y.-:mmyrnm X.: a&uki. ii *Zoning Pile #1411 September 1#Page 7 of 9ragts /cSipUance with ^he fub^yision^^^^^^^^^^^ ^heincorrect, but wouldn t be i-here have been twoCity_ for 11 'c«ated adjacent to_ aub.tMdardCity for 11 years and since . adiacent to substzmdardsubdivislona where outlets^ ^bv^^thrcityoarcels (The Ski Tonxa ^ -„k/Hv-iaion approval by the cityEach was a lot the owner of the properties toand the original parcel. The substandardbe developed around -rea requirement for theparcels were not ^jought up to the a^r«^ i^ezoning district rather the the time Lanier hadexpansion area ”^iVon was considering purchasing thehis property for “Svised that if he acquired the Lanier property. Jot lines would be erased and he substandard parcel that .^-t substandard parcel up to would be responsible for ri g appear per Exhibit P Mr. current code compliance. bring his property into two acre taniei had Reviw «Wbit 0 Mr. Carlson'scompliance since 1957. where there is discussion that juno 1988 is even “O'"®. land to Mr. Lanier because his the City would require him to gi This City had never JJ^pert? did no\”«« f out bknfp^^^ m tact, atrequired anyone to ^ive land up itn other two referenced thl time the City were Ht aside for purchase at the subdivisions, these o"^^fJf/®/or future septic development, time the areas were our ordinances to bring Clearly we have no development up to code, but we substandard parcels adjacent to of the revised plan would certainly encourage i . ^ixow for the creation of a ?here is adequate area but only if the separate outlet for future sept P ^wo cond’ ions developer would ^^ree. ^itv with authority to demand t nat a that would provide ^^® to development be brought up tosubstandard parcel adjacent ro current code standards: 2. If developer purchased substandard parcels adjacent to lands to be developed. AS for Item 4 the “PP^^^^®" ^''ff City ^w\*shVs" may*provide “reet and S‘««‘ ^Md aroa’^^ please review the ‘?op^V«"^er\*"ctrcVo'‘fi l?st 1 through 6 (Ehibit Q). Item I. Neither the or” Fox Stznt when access additional curb cut °^_A®/piat road. The land owners have «b^°tha1 ” th^L Sevelop« reasslre this in the private covanents. TOi developer should be asked to comment. ijSW; ■■Nf ■ mmMikyrnwymsBrfpffjfp' mm mfmm -'v-V VV *; • • . '..k- •y .J ;; m P- friy/yrr-: ^ ■v^r- mm m -vK a KmmysM ili y;- -V ■ :. = • Y • -1 Y-. V-y ’Y ■ .yy. . ■:• vaaat* ’-yY; Yy;:Y,..y;vyi^ M 'Y ‘ . --fV.-.' ; ; y Y. Y. .•■„.■ y m'sMM yiiji:£*YYSA mm&m ilY-Sffii -:.Y" i ‘V Y£3 £Y- ■J: ri r?" ';■ : -('■ wmm i. J. .Y^ m0mk'• vY;y;i y5Y Mr. Lanier that a excep'..’on into ,s unfortunately ve been with the » have been two t to stibstandard ctoria Estates), oval by the City the properties to The substandardlirement for the ated to provide 3 time Lanier had ng purchasing the he acquired the le erased and he lard parcel up to er Exhibit P Mr. rty into two acre rIson's letter of s discussion that anier because his is City had never paid. In fact, at er two referenced r purchase at the tic development, nances to bring jp to code, but we the revised plan the creation of a but only if the tily two cond^ ions to demand tnat a be brought up to a considered in of the City. larcels adjacent tings along Fox les may provide ease review the t Q). l11 approve an reet when access and owners have ivate covanents •¥2 - •' ii;;:-.-' mmmMsM -T*; ,2:-; .2 1*21 P: '■‘vP ■--f. . 2 >2 ipii m--'- .-s ■ 2V-2' WM ... S ■ . ••'r:: ■••■ ■ 2; -2 22 2 s m m •' ’ ■:mmmi, ajiVi.' -‘-i: ■;m 'Wm- wm :p.- :::f^ Zoning File #1411 September 1, 1989 Page 8 of 9Item 2. The wetlands within this property are not protected wetlands under the DNR. They are not subject to the United States Department of Pish and Wildlife and if major alterations of a wetland are propsed the Army Corps of Engineers would be asked to comment.Item 3. I believe this was previously addressed by staff.Item 4. These requests have already been addressed by the applicant. ^ Item 5. Has been addressed by applicant. Item 6. Will be addressed by applicant. Prior to noting the Planning Commission's options for action staff would request that if members have questions or seek additional information to contact staff prior to the meeting, staff suggests that you make this request by Tuesday- Options of Action Denial. If denied Planning Commission may deny it on the basis proposal is in conflict with the intent of the subdivision regulations of the City. Refer to Section 11.02 Subd. 2 for a listing of Intent. Approval based on the following findings: 1. Applicant has submitted adequate septic testing to confirm that there is suitable area within each proposed lot to satify the on —site sewage code of the City of Orono. 2. The proposed lot design and configuration finds that each lot has satisfied the lot standards of the RR-IB Rural Residential zoning district requiring no variance with in the approval of this subdivision. Each lot can be developed as a residential unit without the need of future variances. 3. The. only variamce that has to be granted is the variance that would require each lot to achieve access via a public road. In the creation of the private road the City must grant a variance. Staff would suggest this is in complete conflict with the true intent of the code as the City discourages access onto public roadways and encourages the development of private roads. Approval is subject to the following conditions: m • 'V-' • wmm^k-::H 22*::,;am2.2:2''1 2: ;V2V';. - : V •;■ ► ■ Mi Pi m 2' kk.y-^ mkki V; . yi'-'-- ••■'••J -' k -:2' ■ . : ».••• •2---;2..v|^2., 2;; 2.2 .2., •-i-Mm K-‘==f - 2. 2. , 2 kklk ■mk .22' ' ..2*. .©V» mmmkm I ■ liJMiii ^ ix:rk^:y \^2©;^M ^ 2 r ■ V©' V U. 'Ji'B -i r .-•fA' imwmre not protected t to the United lajor alterations 'Ineers would beby staff. Idressed by the ions for action sstions or seek to the meeting, isday. it on the basis intent of the > Section 11.02 :lng to confirm d lot to satlfy s that each lot al Residential :he approval of t a residential e variance that abllc road. In ant a variance, b with the true ss onto public i roads. or plat road. detention areas by Installing r.’.t ■M M > •. -i. Y mm 'y. - ■ v''-h mm m V ^ - . -j.! yy > W.I r:\i #.|*s ■■mm-. i’ m. ■ V‘'■■Ti m, • '■' ■. ■' rnyMiMK m mm 'y.-. ::yry ’y mm v'yjia .■:» . :i <vV^ ^•y%y-*:y4. ; •. • :A-•”/; •••'•/•■•.V ’^r-:mm:mmmr mS ■' .' . •■•.. ; ■ .wm■■•.-••H'--' .'. y,':i:4>y:4:s4t|^t y ■:' ■ 4 »y^ ii:^l "■■•-.-.4'_. yyvi:'.-■■■.'.; ,-'. ' ‘y .; vv't-;;:-':; ; - . y .y : .. r.-'l. •**•’.'■;- *• • ’V ^ ■••■ ;' -yyv^v'y..- yj:^:y.j ' JH &K;'yy-" yt*#y rn- •m. J31 ^77^--•■••■ -^v/ .y .•;;.■•■ - vy .':y.m y . 'y : yy; y ^v';yy■■ y ";-, - 4:: ^ 1< 7'7 ' Vf" ■ ♦ ^ ;y;'-'4,y j.:^ ■mm; ''•=»?.,■ 4’-.;./yJ..4■•.V--4 ... 4i mm t is./:•••■ Zoning Pile #1411 September 1, 1989 Page 9 of 93. Applicant to grant underlying road and utilitv all road outlota to include future extenalon rttdi;Mt*lM“«M,‘° In‘‘addTtlo*/''*“w" eaaement over 5easements over drainaot tlv2 shall provide drainagevlthin road outlets and drainaae lines (not locatedto lot boundarii. drainage and utxlxty easements) adjacent «l^L'’nVn«“nd‘upAeeroVpr!^«rrVad'”a‘^ =“*‘ take the =u,tomalrl«S uYed " y t". lo%"rn*t,=7o*"a53Je‘« ^a4„\"e1i7cr T «"p%°crp%4 ‘v*aJS and retention areas by private propwty^iJ^eVe®" °* ’'“S'” ^raft prior the the tiling of the final plat! liu»l%!?«.VVate44"aU'’'' ‘>‘*<>re the Council the ?«S"itffi%43‘’t'rl‘c'£ Minnehaha Be Applicant to provide copies of formal landscape plan. « outlet to theexpansion. •*<=ePtlon to serve as area for future septic boundary dispute 'a^^the^^ifoAh^ must resolve the Applicant to Advise the citv i« ;r.^ property,such dispute. ^ ^ the method used to resolve yy ..N mmymym V .' ' 4; .>--.y^y yyy 4 4 ..,V y-: ■■■■ ‘' . ■ • y--.; :. >-y 4-:y ,y.y: .vyyyffij;:: m m ■■■•■■•.; ■;•-y-y^ m;|fly .' ,;V f' :y;..mm fif" ym :«yiSS.4 y'/y.::y:yyyy- yyV'y yy;. r 4744 «IMh^r- i'©ftseinents over n road, outlot A.©wage easement over 5 all provide drainage lines (not located ty easements) adjacentthe shared cost of Applicant may wish to ^ and Incorporate In will expect private tlon of drainage ways SrSe >pllcant Is to draft the City for review fore the Council the •Ian by the Minnehaha >rmal landscape plan ite an Outlot to the for future septic nt must resolve the : of the property, lod used to resolve ■.-msmwmmm.k:,--'-,- - ■V-i v-v,;-vr August 14, 1989 The Sussex Square Development subdivision application of the 3020 FOX Street is scheduled for review Sy Planning Commission at their special meeting held ol W^Msdav, SeptMib«r 6^. 1989 at 8^00 All persons wishing to “*i Written conments are Notices have been sent to all persons listed on the official pro^/tV^- persons within 350' of the subject Sincerely, ^^-^eanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator I »:f#s-S3 .1:a; ^fei. ■■;•» A. '.f]r ■:•.v . i*i-y- ' ' V. ‘krnm n- : ■ " '* A A' , V:.^S?^ h:- .*.'A.Akifii3Sd f’a:: mmmm-Piraf ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR® WWP AODR I . ONNill MAME t ■ I TAXPAVERNAME/AOM• »■ PROP ADDR' ; OHNER NAHE A TAXPAYER ''' NAME/AOOR PROP ADOR A • OltCR NANS • *•■ ■. .'« •* . :)' 0^ *^* -•'1c.4T'«.'< '■(mMmMmRUN DATE 05/09/8f BATCH OOf KEMCPIN COUKTY PROPERTY INrORHATXQN BYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LISTSB 04-117-2S AS 0004 00S70 UAF ST L P STENART A R H STENART L06AN P A ROBYN H STENART S70 LEAF ST S tONB LAKE m 55S5A SB 04-117>ES AS 0005OOS70 LEAF STL P STENART A R N STENARTLOGAN P A ROBYN H STENARTS70 LEAF STLONG LAKE HN 55S5ASB 04-117-2S AS 0007 00S9B LEAF ST KATHRYN A ANDERSON KATHRYN A ANDERSON STB LEAF ST LONO LAKE MN 55S5B SB 04-117-AS AS 0009OOSAO LEAF STH C FURCHNER JR ETALHENRY FURCHNERSAO LEAF STLONG LAKE HN 55S5ASB 04-117-AS AS OOAA 0S150 RIDGENOQO CIR J D BRINDLEY A P J BRINDLEY JANES A PATRICIA BRINDLEY S150 RIOOENOOO CIR LONO LAKE NN 55S5A SB 04-117-23 AS 0023 03100 R1DGEHCX)0 riR FRANK J A PATRICIA K ROUTSON FRANK J ROUTSON 3100 RIDGENOOD CIR LONG LAKE HN 5535A SB 04-117-AS 24 0004 TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR BARBARA K COFFIN BAI»ARA K COFFIN 3025 NATERTOHN RD LONG LAKE HN 55354 3B 04-117-23 31 0001 00425 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S NAP LANTON DR NILLIAH 0 LANTON 425 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD LONG UKE HN 55354 ^ PROP ADOR i;: ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 04-117-AS SI OOOS 00505 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S GERTRUDE HENTSCHEL GERTRUDE B HENTSCHEL 505 SO OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO LONO LAKE FM 55354 SB 04-117-23 31 0004 00535 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ROBERT S BRANSON ETAL ROBERT S BRANSON 535 S OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LONG LAKE HN 55354 :J PROP ADOR » ill' Olf^R NAHE . I. TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 3B 04-117-23 SI 02940 FOX ST NINA N NILDHAN NINA N NILDHAN 745 SPRING HILL RD ORONO HN 55391 0009 SB 04-117-23 SI 0011 02BB0 ST LESTER / /1PS0N ET AL LESTER E tH^SON 2880 rOX ST RT 1 BOX 325T LONG LAKE HN 55354 I' 3B 04-117-23 23 0004 0003B ADDRESS UHASSIONED L P STENART A R H STENART LOGAN P A ROBYN H STENART 370 LEAF ST ORONO HN 55354SB 04-117-23 23 0010 00400 LEAF ST E T A S A NILLHAN TIMOTHY HILLHAN 400 LEAF ST LONG LAKE HN 55354REPORT NO^ Pi4SS40l PAGE 24 tHM 04-117-» ti 001700038 AOORESS UNASSIGNEDH H • S J LAUEHERMAN N • SHIRLEY J LAUE594 PARK LANELONS LAKE MN SSS56 SB 04-117-23 SI 0002 00435 OLD CR>STAL BAY RO S CAE NOLAN CHARLES A ELIZABETH NOLAN 435 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S LONO LAKE HN 55354 i SB 04-117-2S SI OOOB 02920 FOX ST CHERRY C STUBBS CHERRY C STUBBS 2920 FOX ST LONG LAKE HN 55354 p-.:. 1^: fi' 3B 04-117-2S S2 0002 03060 FOX ST J CHADWICK A K L CHAONICK JOSEPH A KAREN CHAONICK 3060 FOX ST LONG LAKE HN 55354 i WL m t, > V -v'; fc, a K-mm-m:'i mm JMI ill ’^vVS^m . • •...m5; ^ :m..■mm-■r yi ;•> ; -iy'iv ^,,v■‘Vyy■^y;y‘y : y'rt,:■y^;y■ ry\yry-^y.;>./ 'y.J:'y‘\y M. -. ■■" ; r-:^y^v.'-.ylv.viiyy 'yy:'.' m::myryyy^ m- ymm wmgMm lift.:V J'ivI r.T]£p-'"vl»OHT NO. PI435401 PAGE 2616(SIGNEDrEHARTrEHART • .27SSIGNED I r 02 BAY RD S X- NOLAN RO S i^psz ^ • I mm lOB )02 MOHICK )HICK .■*:7- 1^-#* W fSp: ^.* V^' ■■ . I VV-, ',;77c::‘: ■ 4-.' ^ -.i".;. • :■ -:. ■ :■' .•i .rnmm ^rm,. .:rr :!r:-.' ;^ ‘ ;••; -r; :■ =■•. ••• W\ ., m ’•V Blip . r % ‘ .• ®':; 5 rv'vJa- r>1 mm uv, - ^ • '-r^m ■■•<.■■ fc^»‘ *t^vy ..V , -f 'rr. 'C W7 7:€.^6• y^i, :.?’amm-4 A‘--a--' ■^r\:<;:«.. .•.'I'^mmm ’.-iwii.iy-::y:-ymm.efy>*V:sifeJ-;;\-:;a^Pa>4,: ■' X,;y.y;V,£-.i(;yi||i^' • :. . • '•; •'■ ' :■"y ;.• * . . •• •* ■; . A.._■ ■■' ‘ : > : • ■■.' •y-v'i ■' . - .. 4 . •. •• • * ■ . : . - * ••*.. 6.* V6My yxm-mE'M.mm m.*‘ (Q RUN DATE 05/BP/B9 BATCJI 009 METMEPIN COUNTY PIH8»ERTY Xf^ORHAnON SVSTEH PROPERTY OMCRS LISTr- t't ; “4 PROP ADOR OltCR NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR SB 09-117-2S S2 OOOS OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NINA N NILOHAN NINA N HXtDHAN 795 SPRING NIU RO ORONO MN 55391PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 30 09-117-23 32 0006 03020 rOK ST NINA H NILOHAN NINA H NILOHAN 795 SPRING MILL RO ORONO m 55391'm.o PROP ADOROMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR IB 09-117-23 33 0010 03175 FOX ST DAVID A HAASS DAVID A HAASS P 0 BOX 392 LONG LAKE »0I 55356 0 I . . PROP ADOR I OHNER NAHE I;v TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR M 04-U7-t3 54 0011 OSOOO FARVIEH LA JAR OLSTEN JANN L OLSTEN laOO INTERNATIONAL CENTRE 000 INO AVE SO MPLS •*# "'♦OE 0^.1- PROP AOOR I.(MKR NAME TAXPAYER HAME/AODR SO OS » - -tZ lA 0007 03E00 tAVSlOE RO RAT H jNKEHA ROBERT L A TERESA H NINKEHA 3200 BAYSIDE RO LONB LAKE »M B535A I m. '■ ■•- . • E;'t PROP ADOR OlOCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 3B 05-117-23 91 OOIB 03211 BAYSIDE RO A J ROBBINS STL ROBBINS ARNOLD J ROBBINS 3211 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE m 55356 * 14 y-'•7 V IX ^ rnky'mm SB 04-117-23 32 0004 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NINA H NILDHAN NINA N NILDMAN 74S SPRING HILL RD ORONO m 5S391SB 04-117-23 S3 0003 03099 FARVIEN LA A E HEMMNBSEN JR ET AL ARTHUR E NENNINCSEN JR 3099 FARVIEN LA LONG LAKE (M 5S35A30 04-117-23 33 001103125 FOX STA 6 CARLSON A S J CARLSONALAN CARLSON A SUSAN CARLSON3125 FOX STLONG LAKE HN 55354 30 04-117-23 34 0012 030B0 FARVIEN U J N PARKER ADC PARKER JOHN N A BONNIE C PARKER 3080 FARVIEH LA S LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 05-117-23 41 0014 00545 LEAF ST J A C NC COY JOHN L A CHARLENE M MC COY 5525 HILLSIDE CIR EDINA m 55435 38 05-117-23 41 0019 00445 LEAF ST NAG KORONKIEHICZ JR HALTER J KORONKIEHICZ 445 LEAF ST LONG LAKE »M 55354 ■ 4, ; "3:^ >■#* -•*■ > ? '»!(REPORT NO. PI435401 Pim 27SB 04-117-23 32 OOOS 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO NINA N NILOHAN NINA N HILOMAN 745 SPRING MILL RD ORONO MN 5539138 04-117-23 S3 000403091 FARVIEN LA J A S OUDZIAK JOSEPH OUDZIAK 3091 FARVIEH LANE LONB LAKE MN 5535438 04-117-23 34 000702905 FOX STmark f EN6E8RETS0N ET ALMARK A CAROL ENGEBRETSON2905 FOX STLONG LAKE It! 55354 38 05-117-23 14 0004 03240 BAYSIDE RO DAB BOYLAN DONALD K BOYLAN 3240 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE »M 55354 38 05-117-23 41 0017 03225 BAYSIDE RO R B A V 0 SHELDON RONALD B SHELDON PO BOX 41 LONG LAKE FM 55354 38 05-117-23 41 0020 00525 LEAF ST JONATHAN CHAPEL JONATHAN CHAPEL A CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE 525 LEAF LONG LAKE FM 55354 Tr-1 .. M U ■ Kb U ®fiiy• L'>' o m. iM: mlfV'«urn *_i Zt iFTwIt 9 V - S’v I Vs ‘ii- ^4:Uv.mi ' •! ’■ 4 , RIM DATE 05/09/»fJ r BATCH 009rj, • l->iV 'yy® ‘ JUST-*®” ®”*»I,',. TAXPAYER GEORGE H OIXC' L,i NfiHE/AOOR 121 HASHINGTI50 05-117-22HPLS m 5541!.y vs fci'i. * * wi \A.n■Is* © i t Eml: ... ‘rr.:- |:'v IFiTir mv- . i>vy;v ’A‘’^a " y■”'y;;'aia iiiS&'lSsa . ■ - -.y feS;': y. V'-'i r -r- « -•■i •-V , ♦pt;. t ’-it;mv%>'V.M'iiidttiIIREPOUT NO. P1435401 PAGE 27I 0005 UNASSIGNEOI 0004 LAME553554 0007SON ET At 6EBRETSON L ■-%55355 4 0005 RO N'j d 55355 1 r-'i 1 0017 RO ON N '"• l^-•> 55355 :'^p*l 1 0020 . A CHURCH OF ICE 55355 :'m^H V-. • .• *. •- ' . ■\.'\ ’" 1 “'I .. . • •• ' • •*,• ..•'.••■** :<•: •• ' *•?■•>••••- •• •:. • • . Jjrvxii'-;4v'^ m: .* i:-.;. ■ : ■ . \ \:-:d d dj:j, !^'iSliWpv ■'-«.' :. JnHHE.<«aillfc^-^..!.. 'V mm: v: :;:^aite.:x .alia.-r- : '• ■•^drd •V ■ '.-r;-.Bmis®■ '. ■■.' '■ ■■> ' . ' .-‘v;dd-;ddj:.d^^ ■r : a- ?^Ad-rndmI ^ MUt BATE M/09/89^■dt HE»0«PIH COUHTY POOPtOTV INFONKATiaN SVSTtH PROPERTY 0»tCI^ LIST,*■ rt.;.I MOP MMWOMCM NMC M 0»-n7-ES 40 0004 OJtSO FOK ST 6C0RM N DIXON;; : —LT"-" weome h oixon• I.,'! MMi/AOOR m (MSNINOTON AVC S »i 4l7 A' M*LSm 55401i.;a *.r. taxpayer M 05-117-23 A4 000503400 FOX STJAMES 8 FULLERTON 111 ET ALFULLERTON LUMBER COP 0 BOX SOMPLS m 55440mdmd dS,Mb B . J * p ^ Q Q ■ -i • . ll • ♦: h • r f'-''/t;.' f, PmIddd'MdddfddM^mSM^'-dBmm ....^--• ;• " • : vm: ■ •■•••. ^ \dy - ■- Liii ■ ■■■ v^.v^:;v - a :•WMd:y^ ii«» Bt-fc.:-:. :. : '-.o> *pmd-:mmB ■f':-a:■: V. : • .* . REPRESENTATION OF^INF0RWT10 n'aS^'**wL« J*^*^^**^' **® TRUE OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT^OF^P^rDrZ'^Tf ™ RECORDS OF MV KNOMLEOGE A»« BELIEF. P«OPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST I'wiH is« a V -BBimmBmBy ■'cV.mmBsmi:W^I. -v •• :di^B^BIddB:y-: -jSKSf ■t-j:.a'a -v mmi, liia■-•■.^.i'':/''r;v;.>- ■ av::llWRave--:::.a^i^S ■ . <•■F - K f Wlfti.KPmr NO. PX4SB40I PACE 2t TOTAL BATCH 009 00030 !>• »E AN ACCURATE AND TRUE JEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS M)PERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST l^pSEj| /> % t'l:: ■'#;Jl: ^ -f . •• > S :'■mmm:mQEORQEKChiMinMGMtfMIm• ►.• A June 27. 1989 Members of the City of Orono Planning Commission Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE: Proposed Fox Bend Development in the City of Orono (the "City") Preliminary Plat Application No. 1411 (the "Proposed Project") Ladies and Gentlemen: I am writing to you as the owner of a home and property—3250 Fox Street—located near the Proposed Project. I believe this letter also fairly states the views of Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Chadwick, 3060 Fox Street; Mr. & Mrs. James Fullerton, 3350 Fox Street; and Mr. A Mrs. David Maass, 3175 Fox Street, although because I'm leaving town imnediately I've been unable to show it to any of them before its mailing (though I've been in phone contact with some). Based on the public hearing before the Planning Commission Meeting held on June 19, 1989, on our review of the initial Preliminary Plat, and on advice from legal counsel, we note the following problems and concerns relating to the Proposed Project: 1. 2. The Proposed Project contains an excessive number of lots. Given the abundance of low and wet areas on the subject land, the Proposed Project is simply incapable of accommodating the number of lots indicated on the Preliminary Plat. We urge the Planning Commission to require that the nunber of lots be substantially reduced before granting preliminary approval of the Proposed Project. We note that Lots 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, U, iC. 13 and 18 fail to conform to the City's 200 feet w:dth requirement. Because no undue hardship exists we propose that the City not grant variances to the width requirement for any of them. JUL 3 '"9 121 VtaNngton Annuo 8oum.Na 617 Mmoapols. IMnnosoiA 5S401 012/339-2720 mmm l-ry.ui Given nber ning ly iances We understand that width varf;inrae *jlocated on cul-de-sJcs. It mv^I?this willingness trarant «*«"Vle. that because!S i '^. Elrri . «==;: aSH -discouraged.- ”*“* [c]ul-de-sacs should be overdevelopnient of the Proposed Project we ssiSsliis ??'“• IToilir ll^tllJll^ ‘5T’? «"«r..tton e««er.ts or Is generally thought to be 3 to 4 has an effect on°the water level of exlstfn^^*low areas of the Prooosed Pm<«rf°^ existing ponds, wetlands and Prel1n.1narrpfat p^eJa^Jd J^^ess^s f'* The City should Insist elconditions, other mean^that all ‘=°"se'"vat1on easement, or would be In "normal" or^lven -flood"'*co^?tt*'"* they ...■= •;, . ■■ . i' - m V,'; i V- - viyi ,.i ■•.. :. , •■•<. =V-..::-:--v >•:. ' :;/. . ' mm:Ife:m4:v • . t26 om ■‘>1 •r‘ • * *. •?•». • : * ■■>:m*■ ' : ■ Hi ILr-y. -■»lasces are sometimes granted for Tots«?«"Vle. that because nces Is known that the cuT-de-sacsed. A cul-de-sac Is thus a way to getting around" the width 1e Preliminary Plat suggests It Is (tended to Leaf Street* either ir point. Eliminating a cul-de-sac •ectlon 11.32 of the City's ;ates that "[c]ul-de-sacs should be opment of the Proposed Project, we Increase In the rate of runoff, ty of runoff, into Lake slon should require the :h will ensure that the rate and sed Project will be In compliance latlons promulgated by the .t and the City, in part because ty of some of us, we would like to . Plan and Erosion Control Plan as ( Planning Conmlsslon for review. rough conservation easements or Project preserve all existing e any flood plain alteration, Ich may be encompassed by the enerally thought to be 3 to 4 Is reasonable to think that this )f existing ponds, wetlands and It seems to us that the "s. Coffin S Gronberg, Inc. may •e under more normal conditions, •ugh conservation easementj or low areas are preserved as they d' condition. This should s—from "normal" or .preferably of property adjacent to these t does not show the required wetlands and low areas. The all subsequent plots to do area should be relocated. - f'> .(i. .'■iMifdMi v::i- .-•f SI U'>:-V • •< V ^ I > < mima Aei'm WWF If ■ Li; . .iL- a&A. f . K K- H K • Wa F ' 1/:FAF:. - . ' A-'A'A A ■; ■ ■■.■/ A . .yy-:rnm^-3-5.6.He note that, as of the date of the public hearing, on-site septic testing has not been conducted on any of the proposed lots.The City should exercise Its authority to Insist on the reasonable preservation of all existing shade trees, and to require new shade trees be planted In the open areas of the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 11.60 of the City's Subdivision Regulation.The developer should provide the City with a vegetation map. Indicating the location of existing and proposed trees. As concerned residents of the City, we welcome any development that enhances lJ.e value of the land and that promotes the Integrity, stability and teauty of the community. Although the Proposed Project, as reflected by the Pi^llmlnary Plat, falls short of meeting these goals, we are confident that we Proposed Project can and will be developed In a manner that Is agreeable to the developer, the City, and the surrounding property owners. We are eager to work with the Planning Commission, the City's staff end the developer to resolve the above concerns and problems. cc:Mr. Joseph Chadwick Mr. Charles KellyMr. James Fullerton Ms. Maureen BellowsMr. David Maass Mr. James HansonMrs. Donald Wlldman Mr. Jeffrey JohnsonJann Olsten, Esq.Mr. Edward CohenMr. Mark Gronberg Mr. Edward BrownThomas Pantallon, Esq.Ms. Sara Moos - r •= . : : i--. < ■mmmAm iL:3%E Immy I AmmFmFAAmm ISPIBim m fffy:: ■Fyp' ■ -■•■t f“ •*v ' ^ • X mm P"4 - - - mi XimA • r • r ' . : • s'- • •• . i. •■> ■»:V=\, -I^i * -i j. . - > ■ wm * :. \c: .Avfc vk*. .’s' CJ^C TU. 1‘ff‘f, ^ PA.7U K/i. J^iL^UuStA. ' /j^U'r'U l^yi2U<U^ y-^‘ ’'-'ru^‘ ■:'~c kinil. ■ 'i^UcAj a^iji^ri^ O-dui'/UiA ■h • • ••• '• t %• .. ., ^ ■ ..• ••• .'• ' • ..' ' .. V. * • ■-• * - • • . ‘ • - : ,V.^.»*. •; \, \ '' . •«■ . • - ' • ‘ ' 4 * *.•*•, ; '£Cffn,CC/[j -yn^iZA^ /zrjt,^ li^ 'Tic ^uu^/u f<fO^^^<!U^A2£a 'ilfZCA /KcX'J^^^ yXc4Sd4Z 'it AtXy ':^Xyt'nj 'tO'/iXX Jz ^ --------------- X/Jytu^'A, -4r^ Juu<^ ' U^Z^AAc^yU^--.fvM V^.^4^4..4 •>».. 3 ^V- - - .* * • *’ . '.« -rjk^ -€. ^$ j, * «. **.: .. '• *. m:\ ■-’v . ■ • •.; • "V.................... X^MX: ■ : " « ■ - : . ■ ■ m m-- m, r • •..■•. ?-. •;vy:,'v;v - .■ • :■ . ■;--'W*- ^'" . ■■ '• ■‘•.■.vv.'^v ^js4c dZf ^ ‘^7i -JS/4, \x^'4Xr-y '.■■■•.*■■ ■.'U Wieisjaismmmmr ;' Xy'< ••:-•- ^ :'V;: .S^.- •V-.; !;••-••■■ . /: ‘.^ -^ .. Pi!>.v?r*. /f/f f\A^E^''^ 'rU'yief';^/W'TVC'X.cJf ^JL.C77Z-^7Z, ^L^^jti^tJUot^ cO c>' -^ai iAjC tAc 'U'^p CUu(i/M^/te^didj> ■ (HUA'/U^a ^IZA/ ^ ruL 7iMf / ' ctd' '^l:t^Jl^ 'ZO'T^^cd >(LA-VU- AauI. yuu^^Az/' wm mmm i:ic ^A6A & ;!S^-. : .’V ■■>,■ Sj';'V 'tm\ f'.'it <& i!^ e:ufXL0iS^^ 7^^ ^£3S. V7Z - -is/I ':.i^ :,:rj ■ '■: .] X "‘i *:• > V- ^ ". mMm rnm-m ,y>- -:' ••^7y--. |;iv ifell WKmimm• '-T.; ■'.■ •"■>•;•!■ :r'.}xxk ^ tesm V- ■ ■■■' ' ,.,a:'!•.M. ..^: ?■•:;•; 'a 'h •V ''ii-i;L. „,>•-44; •■hIj 'i-—..:isrf •4 V v^f’v': y-i.OA\::;,j, i-’/': ; ;vK,;:-:V^:’ v'->^ b:iv 4iLi^''4 if^;i' i.4';ii- ■;■*■• a: ■ • :■•V^ % ##3.'r •' •-.I<,.. 1"—J.- I ‘.* *• . ' • -• . * i O ' ‘•V .. ff»y thm^t'»4 'Mil • ^**'-*-»«»^#/ Amt0 ^0> «/AWCtu^n^, Af00%^smM,'•^5,t'!\-«iirJ''-'fi*‘;.v fe!.:^'-“h’’'-‘“ •"‘‘i<^ J ' '''• I .7' • *9T! :-..l4iy/->.. • ». . I. Sifef > I 1/ *#*>I4 «» V,V'* '. i* Amnt^,} c«r/#^ mm mmmmrrn iV^I ^ 2r**^I 1'.^^ AW ^^mm ------■ A MWA% . ■ ^ ~ ” ”* W.—W ■■■!■» ^ • A mtm AW«»;* -r. ew^;?;;^ '.‘?i5->j . •■» >•«. "•.kM1‘1 .^‘i }•'••>;: vai >.. ’..^ .;y'j j I;;' \ • '.;^ .*.*i* \r * ' \ d,'i ' .k . f<, • ^ . ’ • M W r .* i < •,: r I . Htmmmnm OM«rr. m— \ j y /jy^^w c^f^.Tit t** f\ ••« *J, • *,» I I^:yyi:h t.v mnOm0t^,mrn iM m$rifiA ■5*?;r- i«i •a5;ir.- ':‘-^ ■.•<iif^V!V'-»'J‘.*lT.-. ■: -,'J, i .;^ i; .';>1- 'I*. I^jf r Hi '■ Vu. ' •I *'*' ‘i'i ^ v"‘ . “V"* ^ 6iiiji ..JlJSlHal.Iiw M*t^«ui^w.ODa. 4, ' ." .»Pi% .' 4 ! IdV - Cv : /! V hi* m - -* - _ f .A.» .._.! A .« ‘ j,' Ty f?»*iCi*AV*i4>4 ^4i ‘l]j\- ’;U • 7..-;.’'.-8847os?r. ^,- \ ‘i >»«-*—'-* "‘“"■•*!r-"«- I \ /•?.iS w'>. ■•■ ■: 4:‘jUI-mmAd-dML^- ■: “s®a^::5 . ':'jM 3^ i:” . . .: -.-i-v ^•• • • .a: ;..: : dv. :■:■■■; ..rH^ r ,:,y -:;. : .•^■7..;v- ■> ^ ■.■a--V. -0 V. '. : -^.Ltlmmm •• ‘ '■:' :• .i_.i..;:Ll; . ♦»••••• /^k *:■»l "-d 1.=.;;;■^I.T . ••••, '.■=>’•..^av-a • ^1^-1:V.,- -<It*:''1. . ■ •;i- -4'. <•.•-.• ■. : ■■>T ;v■:<TV a-'?: ..>CITY ' P.O. ! Cryst; ■ vi;. ■■■" ..:-rv.:-..y.;^a:'ai47'p£Mia:;V^:-'i4ai./a::-*,x'i.K:.^:::;' HI .^.•■'\.7=:- =H r; -i ;-;.-4 i .; ■.• ■•;•■• V-:' '..a Iv;t7;i7v TO: :40TS£ apprc addn revis City meetJ IF; < ■'*I . • .V- -.f-i.t;; V'’'' cmrfi^y fh0f ih/A# «npv^ a/ //>#, ^W/9^County, fttawmpfmtit^, roftomnna €tmscr*So^/o^ m thm '•> County of ftmnnoffm'ono^ Stbttt ofriinn^ ••^lA. iru^ V4A..J i ^0 m___< '•.f'« , /• otih Tho >Hw/ i of 3metton' /1. 7bvw^h0p ttZ t^on^oiSi ttiot thopiotI AM _______________ . r „•|^ on^tnto ohoot fo m carruot o^hn^ion^ ' Auetthr» ^uhcftoioion fhomhor on^ ’ fhof mtt otishmeoo ^ ofro, ohoom tn fkott ^ o^ohom%uts^ of p fhoA , ,, > , -,.. ‘ * , j. ihnno^An Coun^ ff^nnoomh, fmrohy tfMr'/z/V AW/ /Ari»»« oto^hoPthm oom$ors otooorASo^ ,n tho fhnmpo O^Cotjniy ^9orooyoek':oo^ ‘ - - t> ^ oomo^ mn^ h romomnmhh h'mo \rinu\»y o/opsoof oinoo tho oorotro of pnof omi^ oototoro of oo»P i-J h tompty 0o»m•T r <W^ mn^ roouooA tAn»m•r J nottoo on^romooof, thooo ooomm 5 .• Ohftod ip moooro/mnto to$thyriy0^7n'^raiz.7:::r:^ •Vl* ^*^fhnnsiOn ffuro . 230^ Hoomomoo Cooorn thuposorp |,r . -i, .« NnitvtN OM«n. UummatA | ! atnit£"«n, na i^Uta na al ^0.1N^aaar«al_3Q.JkS^ava. a^Ba»r.*.. ■' - ^1 -r» -A . •l 5.' f?»iC*\«i^'VrA.v^4 ^4iJi1-V ;! • '..•r,.-:.f..8M70f?r.y.,' ':1•.•l •* »'•» MpiWiia, f •i-;. ..• '"■r^iimii« 11 .MUSi: . r,- .*•:.■ -y-yirm*.MLfette- *■ j ; RK;-'’' - ittaMgs" :gmmm «: mmmm;i L^MM :.r • mL:-:LuL iil '. '* ft- :;;v-‘- -’^v :r^ -^;yy'’Vy;’-gy«;:v:y,;y? '‘'gk'y W>m. JV-i--’''w-Bm W-::U:Bm ■■-■ ■ • • • .g ‘ •■ ::^M mLi ;^ =;■■ BB-.BB B.: ■■-,■ • •.• : f :■. . .?■> ■■ ' •. Bur-BB' ••• ••.';;vg-, V ^.'!;,;-:‘--v/BBBBB '■■. ' 'B-.B-i - ■ ...=i.- .' WBBBsB:BBmBB-BBBU:BBBm BBuki Ty; gg;—■•ii«.-'*-v*:;' ■ ■;i.*fey'gi^':V'<-ji3 >■- - •'(“■'■ -.'' ■ 'i m^B‘Nki.■/-. •'-:. • ■'■ L^m • •••9W.W ^mmm1*«y'.7 ■.;. •■ iBum ClTI OF OROUO?;ysta?Bly, MN 55323 473-7357 ZOJllNG PILE no. 1411T'ICTICE 0? PL.MINI2TG COMMISSION ACTIONDate of Notice: 6/29/89BBn?V7g Lb B}^L■i-'g^S'vs;gi Nina WildmanSussex Square Development 745 Spring Hill Road Waytata, MN 55391 COPIES TO; Mark Gronberg482 A Tamarack Ave Long Lake» MN 55356; yggy'■ygiSf^vy'-'gi mror^PLICATION: Preliminary_Subdivi^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _------------------------ e/7I/oq VOTE; 5 For 0 Againstdate of MEETING; 6/19/89 Planning Commission recommends the following; Tabled for reasons noted below vV inCTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: staff has prepared the ibors^^'^Thes^^ "“=* appropriate issues raised Plan of 18 lots. The addressed with the redesign “ * inf oration must be submitted to th §r4“fo 44 re4444en4he4uie4g4nnin, Cont.ission »eetin, (regular Siting he?d on the third Monday of each n,onth). 1. Location of plat roads (future extensions). A, outlot C must meet 26' setbaOt from designated wetlano tooated on the east side of the property. B) outlot A cast be relocated out of wetlands and also meet the 26' setback. C) Outlot C to be replatted as a through road. Lot configuration: Lot 9 must meet 200- width at rear of 50' front setbacJc line. a ’B-BB-BBMm Bring lots adjacent to cul-de-sac as close to width requirements• C?-:- •fe.,; Environmental impact/quality of run-off: A) A) Compare proposed residential with previous 4%^cr"'Jm444r444enrs\%™/fac4ities will be employedT Please show on grading plan. >ig:;4yg .V •.- {: .- • ub'' B • -.V '. ■ '. .yr- ■ BB-X:B::i ;. ■ *•* 1.• • .• • •: f. ^ BBUM y.:-. /y ; y' = - »4I4 ■'::■>■•-;-ivA wg-;^ BBBBBlimmmiBBiB " j,g.i;V4g. :i •:• ■l^,.>: .■.v:,..)- mmm • •;- ■ ►’ ^ ^ S•^y«Spyf* UiX): ■: g ^:yv.w':;4:v^ te-aH ■ “ir V /.■vr.'••■■*■• X^B bBB F?~'-'iBr^;; :y- E-• •.■-• ; - mmmm 0. 1411SSIOM ACTION f Notice; 6/29/89ergack Ave MN 55356 .nst staff concerns and »se issues must be of 18 lots. The i submitted to the I meeting (regular designated wetland [s and also meet the ont setback Ixne. close to width agricultural use - )./Hennepin Mill be employed? "Vv K9ii»pi®»' mat.A •C. ‘V» - • *.'•■ ’4 >*.•'<»■.■ - Pk?aia 1^:7 o.r -1jh • ■ •••W • V .• •.- •- .• •" ... si V ■ymm- M iK.'mmm '.•■J .... . ■ ' T ■'ft T. ■ . • J:-.C 7^' :--;*.:v-v-:'.;. . .^a- . :/ a;. :.'■••;:—■ ■ ■ ..•. ; 'Ir- ^.Vvt' V •' ■:v:c>:-r .; ■ - u. A CITY CF OSONO P.O. Box 66Crystal Bay, MN 55323 47.3-7357TO: Nina WildmanSussex Square Development 745 Spring Kill Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ZONING PILE NO. 1411 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONDate of Notice; 6/29/89COPIES TO: Mark Gronberg482 A Tamarack Ave Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Preliminary Subdivision DATE OP MEETING; 6/19/89 ”vOTE:'TForTAgainst Planning CcaoBission recmumends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Staff has prepared the following outline reflecting staff concerns and Idd-e^s'-Vd^^itr the^'^rPd^ affected neighbors. These issues must be^f,,r the redesign of the preliminary plan of 18 lots Th^ lo mi m information Lst be Lbmitted to Se before the scheduled Planning Commission meeting {-^qu^ar meeting held on the third Monday of each month). ^ t--gu*ar 1. Location of plat roads (future extensions). ®®tback from designated wetland located on the east side of the property. 26' setback* relocated out of wetlands and also meet the C) Outlet C to be replatted as a through road. Lot configuration; •A) Lot 9 must meet 200 ’ width at rear of 50 ’ front setback line. riquiremSnts^.°^^ adjacent to cul-de-sac as close to width Invironmental impact/quality of run-off; Slo residential with previous agricultural use - established by M.C.W.D./Hennepin Soils Ditt ’ treatment structure/facilities will be employed?riease show on grading plan. m •A-r .r^, . .. . ■'•!:■' ; ^: ■ r'. ■.■ : •: '7- --•7 ..:77--7../-:'fy |r,."V -■: • :.• ^■■■■ ,7l:.v^. ; 7.;;,.^V7:^7-.7.: .. 77^77 7./=7 7^.v-, ;• •m. ■ 77;?':7'^v ;77 I- • :f . ;• . p ZONING PILE NO. 1411anning commission actionDate of Notice: 6/29/89Mark Gronberg 482 A Tamarack Ave Long Lake, MN 55356 For 0 Against e reflecting staff concerns and ighbors. These issues must be tiinary plan of 18 lots. The tion must be submitted to the j Commission meeting (regular th). sions). ack from designated wetland perty. of wetlands and also meet the hrough road. 5ar of 50' front setback line, -de-sac as close to width -off ; h previous agricultural use - by M.C.W.D./Hennepin Soils facilities will be employed? if .mmm51-.: :iii mxmm r-'\ - ^ a^r 1XiX^.'X^y- 1'".- i.-' . ,•: : ■- ■ c ;S-tv,:. ici»4 - W y^: : :^^y .'■' ■ '. i;':■■•■■'. . .. .. .' -.=1fe: :4jt .:.• ■■-•: : :• -=y ■■m >■■ '■ ■-i.':; ■ ; V::?: ':-.;vV;, . .-••■ •■0:,v' 'J •-vK >:v .. .p J A:: v' = :l^ ■■S't.V r = k rn^-’v ■ ■•• W ' ■ •• ■' ft* “.-.i r rr’y- it# ■-V ^:i.^ iy- hZONING PILE NO. 1411NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION June 29, 1939 Page 2 of 24. Drainage: A) Confirm existing drainage patterns or watersheds. ® intersection ofEayside Road. The Public Works Director will be asked to confirm need prior to the meeting. subdiviJilS «viiS? ore required to complete your preliminary oin/°'?lVei?;§''‘^ testlnq for all proposed lots. Please have staff iT preliminary plan before on-site septic evaluator the^i^Mic i °‘ property. Please make sure thatthe septic test sites are located on the preliminary plan. w;terrterD?stL^c\ ‘h® Wnnehaha Creek ^"eVfnrLL“a7ra%7on ‘o^^roal facilities, lo\ qradin. ;• :^ ^ - r V - y-: ^ ;• ••■:t--svv v . V • 't »■, ;■- ■■ '• • • ■ ■• .. ■>t\ V ■: -likti.isi v-.vA:a33a#;" _i r - - ymmiyxm:XM ■, : !!<0'^"''be reaffirmed - soil •uator stake proposed or >ection. in final plat, 1 bearings and shown aswatersheds. to the adjacent bays of ssed guttered areas or ert areas. at the intersection of Director will be asked lete your preliminary ts. Please have staff lite septic evaluator Please make sure that nary plan. the Minnehaha Creek 'mm /proposed). On those n of existing wetlands ilities, lot grading idth standard of 200' L-de-sac to bring into k.V':-..r ■W T-r : .V.*/11 ^ ________MERCHANT, GOULD. SMITH. EDELL, WELTER & SCHMtDT JUN | 0 iSwiW^ '/■'; M1 O^^ICES <M miikwCAPQW II.0^ . A»*0 IT. PAULPPOrcSSiOMAU ASSOCIATIONPATENT. TRADEMARK & COPYRIOMT LAWYERS leoo MIOWC3T PLAZA BUILOINO SOI nicollct mallMINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA U. 3.A. SSA02 (SIS) -»3Z -S300 u -niAMA o. HEIICMAMT (•«%•• iS«3|r. mCPCMAMT tlSOT>lSSSITcucx »so«s9 M • a Mp«TtUlCOPC«> CCITT 01.SI.MI (S«) 9M-SOSIJune 8, 1988 Mr. John Lanier 3060 Fox Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear John: Over a year ago you asked me to sell you some of my land that was contiguous to your home at 3060 Fox Street in Orono. You said that Orono considered your lot to be substandard sized and you would want more land to protect yourself in the event that I sub­ divided my property. AS you will recall, I told you that you did not need to buy from me yet since I did not intend to develop cne land for a few years. Now, things have changed. You have your property for bale, and I am closer to developing. Accordingly, this is an appropriate Lime to pursue a sale of a portion of my land to you. I am writing to offer to sell land to you, or to your buyer, at a reasonaole price. I spoke to Mike Gaffron at the Orono City Office and he con­ firmed that Orono may want your home on a larger piece of land. He said that when I subdivided, Orono might require some accomo­ dation that would put your home on a larger lot. I think you will agree that would be unfair for Orono to make me give land to your property for free when I develop my land (perhaps that is why you offered to buy land), so I am writing at this time to offer to sell land. -• * -•*’ -.li?'i* ‘-TV.. A* ■ ‘•V*“ *•* * ■ - ■••• f-.- mmm Jl -f.- mm:m "■'. ■' ;-.i. , •V • ^ 'mxr: ' V ■ ■' -• : A. v;,.v- : /.IV. x/- •• ■ i- ■ • V ' ■• •••. ‘.1y-mmm m-fl limmmmwi®V 'iiiilfer:..:; y4 -:.-.V.:4i^y;jjjd^:.■'-4-;.v:--vv. - . ■:ammliiittwwm & -,r . ■ ISmmm V.-,; . ' .■ ,^m'^ m. • V; -if ; mMmy-m IB '-^B-immm V-V P - 4' ■Ei-;/r ■ V-'v - . / :,'. -. •■ ■. .• •■ •■'^; ■■' •"■ %f.'V ■ ■■: ;'-r'v v•"^^ ■-.> yy/ym/^-y:.yy f'% .:' mmm■ ■;■• ; - >;■ ■' ■•.:■ 'y-m'WK m-: mMMmMMy^ ■m /: ■yy'-' '_^:-■ mwi■• •• ■ s/*..; • •' .' ■STJ— ;.':■••■ •• ■ ^ y-'r.... y.^:M.'Mm :,v ymr-■ mmyy:m.y mm& WfTf^PI7F dm I-my<■M :?.. •■C:"-' ' : /■ -;'myrnmy-Pvs:«i#KSn: -I-’--ym-'-rniImmmyrnr. :v.'h..y :..mm: iilM mtmmmyyymyyyy: ■' ■•' dpyf ■ ■ myt m :. '•>:■■■ tar, X: •■.: :;:^v ..^;j r ■ j iiii r'-^ -V 'hiymmrnmmmmmMm^ pia y^mmmyy ■': :■ ■ : ■ m:.m - i'^'iy'y::. y:: ^ m:x,yy,yyi -r . - '-:v k. wmm .dmOd » siHipi^' a??«sssK:“3Pi^^ r ‘ #pvpyp yvv yyy 1':-; ■ v ;.': vy mm: • ■» =■ ■ ••. ■' =•,•■ .: .. •* .•• ■mm > mi my ■m-:mmm: yt •••-■ ■ •.■ .^ ...< Lir-r'x' ;T^ ^ .-v.:;y “*i PP=SI®fc"r. }'fm ^ ~" rliiiT* I.. m:m I - V ■ •mm. myiy-mi■ I* ■ ^■ ■ ^ •■•«wm «simyysm ■fiiB •/••:• .;‘V- y<ii‘-’^-y‘iy:yy::my.y’^--.imrnmyyy^ eiBw- i im^- yyyy.mi.'Vyr i'^Pvyi tm ■«; ■ yarn. ymi .• ** ' •“ *1 ::•**• rl> - ■ ' 'immyy HR S:^m1m^x-mrn- ymm ir.r, : - • ’••• ,■: T ■ - ■ ■ ■r.'y- • • • .'. ■. ■..■ ;■' V ■• ^ ::• :•. •• • > L.-f^ mm-mmmy. mmy.^mrnm r:r-.;;yy.;'P'tv^vpiymmy:m'^xm ^:ry-'m.yymyy.:mmm.m^ tmmmm . .^ ••:, ':■ . :V; -v: .'* V^^^ .: ;v ;-^c 'hvvC'. «^2cv»-e^. /^iec^ -Ti 1 / - -zfa- j) - Jj" — 5:2 ’'2^ -*\u.~ito ‘i-'n-ii-s-^c. *^3fi.i,,a^^ : 4-li-!': ■ /(k. *<■’ ,J2^^ : ‘f-'n-Slf? 0(£^ It- ■•C" .- v: ,;.::;,'SMiliii::aiiiiis • ‘.- V^^ .r/: :: ... ; . ^ . ••. .•!• • V, ••, •V.- ■-■-^^ ■'4 ;vv-^ie .^-J ::':;r^;2^ ;.--;/=f ;7:; MmmmmirnSm -v/^ ^ 1^ -c-^ JjuJi ^^4^' I-/ tt^cj, ,t«w ^ ^ ^ ^|r *«2tt4J3^ C^tt^ C'v*-&u J^Cl. ^ (/(ec~ma^ pr^nx^^ ::l r ■;f-" ik ;;'. :>■■■ ■'■"SMi;; ’ fer-v'fS.k^2August 31, 1989Members of the City of Orono Planning Commission Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P. 0. Box 66Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323Re:Proposed Fox Bend Development (The "Proposed Development") in the City of Orono (the "City"), Preliminary Plat Application No. 1411 Ladies and Gentlemen: As owners of property located near the Proposed Development, we are writing, in part, to express our disappointment with the revised Preliminary Plat for the Proposed Development submitted by Sussex Square Development (the "Developer"). The Planning Commission reviewed the initial Preliminary Plat at a public hearing on June 19, 1989. At that meeting, the Planning Commission withheld approval of the Proposed Development and instructed the Developer to revise the Preliminary Plat in response to the numerous concerns raised at the meeting. Some of the more prominent problems involving the Proposed Development discussed at the meeting include: (i) the excessive number of proposed lots; (ii) the possibility that many of the lots fail to meet the 200 foot minimum-width requirement; and (in) concerns regarding soil erosion and runoff. Unfortunately, the revised Preliminary Plat (the "Developer's Revised Plat"), which is scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a special meeting on September 6, 1989, still falls short of addressing the problems raised at the June 19, 1989 meeting. In an effort to provide the Planning Commission with a plat that addresses the salient concerns of the surrounding landowners, that complies with the letter and spirit of the City's subdivision regulations, and that, we believe, continues to serve the interests of the Developer, we have retained Robert Kost, a land planner with BRW, Inc. Mr. Kost is very familiar with the City's subdivision regulations, and with other development projects in the City. We believe that the enclosed plat (the "Preferred Plan"), designed by Mr. Kost, is superior to the Developer's Revised Plat for the following reasons: 1. The Developer's Revised Plat comprises 17 lots. The Preferred Plan, by contrast, reduces the number of lots for the Proposed Development from 17 to 15. Although this ‘j -V.'- .. Vf i mmm-nmm mmmmwmm Y siH ,vi . ■ ■ •• ••• •• i ’ ' •■>. •• •'fk. V-. •j;.;.' . ■ ; • .1:. s'.. PPf Sk' - :: rni ■’I "I t (The "Proposed Orono (the "City"), No. 1411 r the Proposed press our disappointment reposed Development "Developer"). The eliminary Plat at a eeting, the Planning d Development and xminary Plat in response ing. Some of the more evelopment discussed umber of proposed lots; fail to meet the 200 oncerns regarding soil ised Preliminary Plat scheduled to be reviewed ting on September 6, roblems raised at the ing Commission with of the surrounding nd spirit of the City's ve, continues to serve ained Robert Kost, a ry familiar with the her development projects plat (the "Preferred o the Developer's Revised omprises 17 lots, s the number of lots 15. Although this 4mm It yMmrnlmt •' 'i ; =• ''i J ills ’ . ;5t ■= y. -r*. -ip-;;:.:V ry -A r 'j|- ■ v^. ..• i,.■•■•• *--:M f\ J .-•n ■ 1-i v-iy'i b i£ii» 'H ■y.:ry.y- ^;tv -0^ .y’ V . y'*> tmm ^ ' 3*^S. Jeanne Mabusth August 31, 1909 Page Tworeduction is mode«!^several benefits. ' “* believe that it „n,pro(iucePlan Proposesnumber of lon«rural character of more P^^eferred acre requirement "eighbSrhooS'"'^ development that JoA ^oal shoJi2 A *^han a the neighborhood, me P '•hlJactt ^ lot sites and the resulTf'^''^'^®'^ '''^n, both symmetry of blends the Proposed , ^°"f^gurations mon^ respect to community. The J^^elopment mto the c.'. ® successfully configurations^ ‘^®‘^ ^^tracti venes? o? neighbors, but also^th^^ affects not only the°^ sizes and IS arguable thf? f^® '"^^'^etability of ''"VJ 7 ^o^7%€slr£"l°f%%"' « concomitant Development ^he land enJom^' ^®''® '^^^1 be less runoff because of%he"^n,f^^ sensitive to soil^ero Proposed because the wat^»n ^ number of ponds and ? erosion and -""-^ent to -nI«tt^n1^- irt\\Je%ity,s Thir(^. _Third regulations,^"<^®^standing of the Ka still fail to miet DevelL!!!?« requirement: Block Joot min^mum-wfl\"®‘'requireme^treT^Jk' the City-s 200 foJt miTr" 7; and Block T 7^ ^°ts 1 and 5- believe the Preferred’ni reducing the numh ^ and foot minimum-width r&n ^^ets or surpasses^hh^ ^ots, we Cha lots in the Orefer«rpian™J!i rlg°" hnLfedgef Fourth, allowina_ _ _ _ . variances.Fourth, allou. ^«quire varianc..^. wetUnd^r^to contai?°u^^®''®^°^^"®"y^acrls of the^nun^et irL'ts^er^""^ tlii's^SJecf^^e^eases this burden. erea. Reducing -cpo^edo™:e?o%--r^:a^'7a^=rfo"^ro-d-^o^:t^:rlr^^ > , ■ ■ >: .'." .f* • * •:^.^*. - v.;V .-:.- 'l ; ;^,r v..ya ■llu.- . : .1^:''>eUeve that it will lots, the Preferred "lore in keeping w!th fh« The two^ Should •anf^boJJ 'nations respect to sS of the lot sizes ;,nH -nhances the i"«aU i“enc:rite« ncompassed by Jhi p?: l:,r^ jattng two lots° thi '=*’e Cxtys 9 of the subdivision r--r^°o1 1-ts^- : k^^\L%^’r -0 ■ require variance^. of the Proposed res of low areas and systems may set area. Reducing access to the ad (Outlot c) that V T - ifcf-’ -y» t- •■' . >‘ r.I' ■^■■■';':>-’M ■j*.-O.' • ■ ■^..■?••' '••'' M ■f *4^e City Of orono Planning Commission «s. Jeanne Mabusth August 31, 1989 Page Three ^®rminates with a f'ni j "V *«e„dx„'^the™:c:e”'%"%" efx:x“^S thx's'tr'o^""that the connection road to Leaf Stree^ Problem probably inevitable Pri h road to leaf “’’derstand to extend the aoo«.= ’ Prudence suggests ^^reet is the futurt, ^°^d to L.af^ftreet now and an accompanying var^^^^ need for a I400^f^^^ access road to Leaf s?r addition cul-de-sac protection. Pieasl n 5®® allows for better ^ does not seem to strvt t A, wl^ich^fo ® Preferred Plan. ® P^^rpose, is omitted shown Svelopir^rK" owners of thedesire to purchase f Revised Plat as the "?5oi^ Property their prorerrv r ®il ® price to be neors^" Reception," oSi or;?:!' ::p\'r • v"£'r ‘ Sr., dated June 14, 1939 *^f® ‘^Jadwicks from John^M ne recallfaH ^ ^ xf| which Mr* r ^onn m, Lanier chadwroh.s con^ir^r”*'^'-'’” ‘^xs 4. The Prf»foi-.—a ...The PreferroH di OevelopmlSt x?rr^^ necoisar? t? Strait. mature ve,etatxon'[n%'h::: """ax'S: veTfr^tle -:rr: e, ^?s ... :n a:::z:;::“- ----:h%-?e-xo— -=0U abb:?d'::\^?:" -/He -^ve. we nobe rhab bh'' approval: following before obtamfn ^ Developer obtaining preliminary plat mm^m L----. ■/ •!!/ ■ X •: . *■■: n :■ . t-Si,':;##'.' ; k;: •. \ mmmm im M J i ' ■*.? ' subdivision mum cul-de-ca« i tes ^hi lengthtes thxs problem et. We understand r.eaf Street is Is better J®”' ^®<^her than * 1400 foot cul-de-sac *' ^’^t.ending the er police and fire I ^Iriven by the T u ®*^^®ntion John M. Lanier, stated that 5th during which •equire Don Carlson ■ > to bring the •on regulations, ‘ommodates the fer plantings o Leaf Street, the Proposed ains very little an answers the The Preferred ' i-s free of on, without, eveloper. le Developer ilxminary plat S'' —. •' ■ -T. '• ' ■' ■■■ • ■ ' * tfeissaft" ■ ‘ummmr . • . • ? ■ >’ ® ' a, 4y r y-r,- y:^-A - ^ V wy ■ -m immmm. Si>s y-.yy. ^Ks£®i„ wmys'W0m§m 1. It is not clear from the Developer's Revised Plat whether the lots oordering Leaf Street and Fox Street will have direct access to these streets. We would like the Developer to clarify that double access will not be permitted, and that no variances will be sought for double access. The lots should derive access exclusively from the proposed arterial roadway. 2. To insure that all state and federal laws are complied with, the City should require the Developer to indicate whether any of the ponds and low areas located on the Proposed Development come within the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the Army Corp of Engineers. 3. We note that Lake Minnetonka 15> 3 to 4 feet below Its normal level. It is reasonable to assume that this has an effect on the water level of the ponds 2uid low areas located on the Proposed Development. The City should ascertain that the Developer's Revised Plat takes account of the current low water level. 4. The Developer should, as required, provide the City with a Storm Water Management Plan and a Soil Erosion Control Plan. Since runoff to Lake Minneconka flows through the property of one of us, we would like to review these plans as soon as they are submitted to the Planning Commission. 5. On-site septic testxng should be completed to the Planning Commission's satisfaction on each of the proposed lots. 6. The Developer should provide the City with a vegetation map, indicating the location of existing shade trees and proposed buffer trees. The City should insist on the reasonable preservation of all existing trees, and should require, in addition to landscape buffering, that new shade trees be planted in the open areas of the Proposed Development. SiSsi tel-r" ::;:iiiMmilP. . '.vle Developer's Revised Plat Street and Fox Street will >ets. We would like the ! access will not be permitted, >ught for double access. The lively from the proposed :e and federal laws are complied le Developer to indicate whether .ocated on the Proposed .sdiction of the Minnesota the United States Department «y Corp of Engineers. >tonka I'i 3 to 4 feet below ible to assume that this has the ponds and low areas located le City should ascertain that les account of the current is required, provide the City .an and a Soil Erosion Control leconka flows through the like to review these plans I the Planning Commission. should be completed to the .on on each of the proposed ovide the City with a ocation of existing shade The City should insist on ill existing trees, and should >e buffering, that new shade las of the Proposed Development liEImmmmsiw&mm ■ ss::• • .•V s S as ;■ ■ ' ./i.•S*€V:'S-;,is mmmrnfyt^-.y ■ •' •.■ .... •• . .IfoV-:. ;••• ■City of Orono1335 Brown Road Soutnp. 0. Box 66 ct=io-iCrystal Bay, Minnesota 55323473-7357 Ms. Maureen Bellows 265 south Brown Road Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Mr. Jaunes F. Hanson 884 Dakota Avenue Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Mr. Jeffrey D. Johnson 3825 Cherry Avenue Mound, Minnesota 55364 I •'' -i. .•: • '• r• •• ■ •. ...•. - • . . ••• . • ■ ■ 'V '.t- .<■Members of the City of Orono Planning Commission: Mr. Charles J. Kelly, Chairman 2720 White Oak Circle Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Mr, Edward M. Cohen 519 North Ferndale Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Mr. Edward C. Brown, 355 North Stubbs Bay Road Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ms. Sara Moos 2160 Webber Hills Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Vi-; :';-vfc'Vv :o;V- :. ><• ,:: ■ :,;5' .;-^..-,.^;,'.^.*=.^->: J2-3 -f; [i !«■;,,:.-y: ‘:'.v: - - • - ,^i>r11^ Hill WBBBm ■ "■■■-■ ■:. »■ .r/. . m •\ If'.'*# rr ■ ■■ ^ ■»■•: -• lev'll; mm•• :i /■■■,‘...” VK•::l«15.riw.v ■ - '■-J . /■ '1^. Wei ^-.L ■•r^' •:' : " i J 0 to- ■s'r9.^ i-s-.a."Members of the ri*.., *Plann.n, Co^xssL"' ”S. Jeanne Mabusth August 31, 1989 Page Fiveto successfullv°Lf°T»f^?.^° working with the Sincerely, Mr\ ana Mrs.'George Dixon "■^'‘‘5i«7T35iir7m5H3-„- Maass . ThlTIp-By^ Enclosure Mr. Charles Kelly Ms. Maureen Bellows Mr. James Hanson Mr. Jeffrey Johnson Mr. Edward Cohen Mr. Edward Brown MS. Sara Moos Thomas Pantalion, Esq. ^ti iinrj Mil ___ I®* Jann Olsten N y m :•»:• V ■• ^ t • « «» . ,:11^ ■.e ■-^.^ -i iPiP=':' ms-m K V- " Vs'.. • v) ■ ' -^ x~'mL ■1 '.’’iigSl' ^ ;■ .tJ • . - . .' .•.'.. C' W:r^ ' X>'y '■•{■■■■■■mx: IMUl ■f- ^ SilB ' > ..^ '1 • . . : ! vf. •. ••. ^ 1.' ’ I*- v.r/ y >.I!' .'•' •..• . Vi* i " ■>:;VVv' f 1 • •*.*•'!!•.•• •.'■•.•• ii':. :XX.;■:>- ■.■ ■■:.;. <• y ••••; ■i >-= : ::Wv?if^-:‘: r ■ •;.: ‘ r ■^'. V-’-. - V '■ ■ ...•• ii;; • ••_ ■ V. ^y: ';r: :.'^■■■■■■■■K-r'-;> ■.'V-':.v.:y- IIk- Ivi' s:; I.'-. V 1: ■■ ":.'.^'-'L'--l. • ■' '■■•■ : mx % -■t\ 'h v:m •Vy ^c-v w -V*'-^■-^^ •'■••■•- W V ..'.• ':. .•!«.. •„ ;• ;•••. ;-:•: : '■•• ••• .'!*■. ■.. •• :• . ;•/ > !. i V--*^;.. •• »;. =. - •••■ "•■It .. ..UiS fci-y'^w.<5;.=»!¥?/S?Jv:'vt:-'tr'-^-::.;:V; d the Developer sues regarding Dixon -hadwick TIerton ass ers mm • •': ■ •.' ='y-5 v'-. i-'-. .:.5- ■• V • * ‘^ ■MIHDTBS OF THE PLWWniG COIMISSIOH MBBTIEG OCTOBW-57 198^ ?ARBIIDAIICS 7:00 P.M.Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the present: Acting Chairperson Bellows; PlanningB?^n arri Hanson. Planning Commissionerstaff. ?*“*'• following represented the Citystaff. Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, AssistantJac^bs^fnd^^r^l^^V'^ Administrator Gaffron, Building OfficialElw7rd%ril.Sin'Llsr««Jded!"*“ #1411 SUSSEX S(2aAKE OEVELOPMEHT 3020 FOX STREET FREUNIRART SOBDIVISIOH CLASS III PUBLIC BEARIIIG 7:00 P.M. duly Publication and Certificate of Mailing were applicantf*^^ Gronberg, surveyor, was present on behalf of the Jahn 0Isten^^^ Farview Lane explained that he was present in the capacity o? a spokesperson for the Farview Homeowners Association. He said that the concerns of the in traffic. Mr. Olsten said that Outlet C would provide a shortcut to Old Crystal Bay Road via Farview Lai^e. The omeowners Association suggested that the access be located Souid®hfU°h"' fhurch on Old Crystal Bay Road. Another issue thA environmental impact and drainage due to portions of the land being wetlands. The last concern is the density of the development. Many of the proposed lots barely meet the 2~acre the dry conditions over the last summer may Th^HoLowni^r^.T®^® indication as to what is actually wetland! 3nnifl ^^4. // I wanted assurances that the densitywould not affect the sewe systems. ^ ZiLil Byers-3083 Farview Lane had a sketch showlno the in*the^JLl'h“^‘* ^ affected by runoff from the highest eltvItiSn in the northern section of the subdivision. the Chadwick-3060 ^ Street said that the low area to Va a” possible to obtain a 2 acre parcel in lots zlnlnt requesting variances for those would addre,»^4-Jfr^”^® ^^4"" Mabusth noted that the applicantconcern in his presentation, but at this time, lot Width vatxances were not being requested. Mr. chadwlch « . .. .. • Mm fSl Mm m'wn VV- w • > . ■ ■. V. •' sj* .. La: 1^1 .... # . f'*’ iSiis rv-:-; : V-'U? mmmm ■■m : ■ '}S^ ^MUfS:priMry access being Farview Lane Be n the proposed150*. He did not%Jte%ith .fnr<.l° allow eine%ency vehicle^"*^®”®®® configurationfurther noted that Out lot a wii^ vehicle access. Mr. Chadwickquestioned whether there area andreplied that filling nay be necessary^butMabusth a designated wetland. Mr CrnnK-^ cut the low area was not had the highest elevations in tSrs„M?vi^?o''n » Arnold Robbin^-171 1 d____ _ concerns Tigi^fFg the inte^lljTf^ expressed his safety Road, and Leaf Street ";,"^®^®®ction or Fox Street, Bavside ^ at that intersection.* He also*1^nt^^a^ * ^ placed preserve as much wildlife habitat as possible. ^®^®” about'drainage. Te*referr\J^o^^^^nd*^® ''** concerned corner of the subdivision o located in the southwest runoff from the Property enters ® part of /”??«« ?"'3 Ihto a i;"di'na runsunder PC, Street andTnVo a hfldl'n, «!!"te?:f “LMr, Dickson's, From there ^ between his property and r®y <Jc»'n his drivewaS^'^nd®!® ® ®“ivert thatextends half way down hi® Proceeds to a culvert tha? alongside his dr/veway? sa?d"thft^ tn”'" inirfdUcJ increas® the amount lawn fe/Alizers^dr®*^-*^®^ density and also Maxwell Bay. Be questioned l-eth.^^S draining directly into reviewed this proposal and if io, what his" '““'ISO, wnat his recommendations were Ml- ___________ _____ • «a a-firlH^tf^Hililn^P >-® t“he*Jo°w° :r«V." ‘®he a Conserva\*’ioTe “a\"re"nt r/o^s' concerns ^1 "dTfr^^^?j^|f„|—.^££££ Concurred with previous access point. rasardlng the need to have more ihin one Mr. cCTwrarr^ ^SS ««« echoed Mr. Fullerton and Increased drainage'wTuId^ run'th^^^T. --®- ‘hat the ^tlot A heads toward a pond arel ’ Mabne^n”'’*".'^' “® ‘»a? Lawton said that would pose s oroKi ? '“"firmed that. Mr. also mentioned a discreoancv iff «ff ^®™ future road. He and this property along the Lr?hMst ‘‘oo7nVr-'^°"* "" P™P®ny . RilArlsy Laue-':"i »_ observations riiirdiMH^„~~ contradicted staff's JortA o, sMe -"division "lre%%irt\\^ d7a"lni ’o* “®‘drainage ran north and — aaisrton;^ ^ ^ .— questioned whether • * -»«■>•,------------^ -----------------------, lfe‘ 1 •VI gaining to e proposed the access figuration > Chadwick area and that area Mabusth was not Outlot B Ls safety lyside >e placed taken to oncerned louthwest t of the low runs erty and trt that a ditch ind also ly into teer had s were. .shed to upheld, across ■evious an one :on and at the d that Mr. d. He operty :af f *8 t just th and -V ^ ' V WM protective measures were being taken to preserve treas and how tree removal would affect drainage.Ms. Lucy Tavlor-3075 Farv iew had a correction to the indicTted drainage pattern. She said that runor^ crossed Fox Street, ran under Farview Lane and ran behind her house. She said there was a culvert that cresses Fox Street and another that went under Farview, 3 culverts under driveways and an open creek behind her house. She invited staff to observe this at their convenience. She too stated that the wetlands were not in theirnormal state.dr, Gronberg informed the residents that he had met with Hennepin County officials regarding the road access. They preferred to have the access across from Farview Lane. If it was moved to the east, it would have to be offset 150' and sight distance would be a problem. He said that the County preferred only one access to keep County Road access to a minimum, with regard to the wetlands, Gronh*<rg said that they did not use the City wetlands map, but took el.*vations in the field to determine the wetlands. They are showing an additional wetland that is not evident on the wetland map. He said that they preferred not to have Outlot A, but the City Engineer had recommended its designation. He said that it was a wetland by nature of th^e soils in the area. Mr. Gronberg said in regard to the 200 frontage width, when a road curves such as this the only way to meet the required footage is to put in cul-de-sac. However due to these lots being very deep and the building sites being placed back, the 200’ requirement would be met. Mr. Gronberg said thau the subdivision plan would be submitted to the Minnehaha Cre^k Watershed District. Any excess water that would result from tnis subdivision would be stored. Additionally, baffles would be rsed to control the water quality and quantity of runoff to it.® present level. Ms. Stubbs said that Outlot A was shown to encroach upon her property. She said she had no interest in selling it at this time. Acting Chairperson Bellows informed Ms. Stubbs of the purpose and requirement for the outlot designation. Planning Commissioner Hanson asked about the soil testing in tha area. Mr. Gronberg replied that the soil borings were l^ing done, along with percolation testing and nc problems have been indiated at this point. Bellows noted that this was a preliminary subdivision and before final plat approval would be granted, the soil tests must prove positive. She further noted that the soil testing would be helpful in confirming the location of the wetland. Planning Commissioner Cohen had a difficult time seeing how 18 lots would fit into this area. He wanted to see two accesses if there are more than 8 lots. Planning Commissioner Brown indicated that he did not like r ;r'„ -y .:. : ■ . - C ' ft mswims. v:mMM :mis and howI to the ssed Fox tse. She bher that pen creek at their in theirmet with i. They [f it was nd sight referred ;m. With : use the ietermine at is not id not to ided its e of the the 200' .y way to ever due ig placed jaid that ha Creok from this i be used E to itp s upon her at this of the asting in are being lave been sion and BSts must would be eeing how accesses not like y'*--.-T.V:,:msmsm Irf <uy as ’.^igs?.r mmmm mm'-m mm 0m- fy-mm} * 4.' . ■ • ■'?4j Ill u fe-:,:-. ^ . y '-v O y 'ts '“=?pa- -■•■.- • ‘i .4 K i,.v . '.V. ■ •• .■•..• • .t •• ■ * .;• : . , 1-- ••''! = ♦-,. . * ..* •:' y; I :Sf> ■ ■'- I •t* V • ■••' '-s> %,> y'-(''l 'Ar/ji if '•u Sf -v..' ,..*■• •' ., i;:; ■ : ;v :-v; ^■.'r ■■ I.” -:•. XV^- Riii foT'/o"t ’ nr in tM. c„e for theacc.ss'!:ci?!eS°w^^'"^°r.rSr" that the proposedparticular attention to dr^Jaae "i’.® -PPUcants t^lyWhen they come back for final approvalwetland^inappropriate, aJd^JoSpared this subdititi ^^l-de-sac was She preferred to see^a throuoh*^« Rebers'. concern about the conflicting drainfa.? /nf expressed to see soil testino ext-onri i^^ci^wation. She wanted buildablility of the l?t in^|eneral.^°"^ septic system use to and tJe"pu%!!l%rarrnrwas%lred!"" this matter #1412 MART L. PETBRSBH 384 NCCDLLBT ROAD Mark a‘o„^V/, tie^%Vu«nt""sS ”e^r as was read S=urS “■* ^““te the cTry.ra^da^?^t^„^^,i-ne was conce. Brty._ She questioned the c“U° encroached into her conesrnod abou^ property, she questioned the CiU°s^ encroached into hei Zoning Administrator MabIlC!^h Ity s legal authority to do that was the City's responllbrilty^To ol?rf ^®t/rson tha\"l"t access to properties that raav^oth®^J^- 1”*^ provide for future on questioned whether 4e Cit7 wL °?* landlocked. Ms.on State Statutes that allow a el tv ^ basing their authority portion- of private prooertv t^-^ • a "reasonablesubdivision. She dlrf n/-.^ j that is needed as a result r>f » property was necessary as a "relulV of Ifh*'- ^©dication of her Chairperson Bellows reiterated Mihnoftsubdivision. Acting that the more density Orono exoerl^me^ ^ ©^Planation and added ««With zonih, *d„i„is..,,;rM%jSs?rt*o"’^;u'’tt‘i:“ PUUnilTC COIWISSIOB hbpresbmtativb AOJOORIQGSRT The October 1 i qoo ni at 10:05 p.m. ' ' Planning Commission Meeting adjourned m ‘■m \1:X: yX rnmmrn-V 4" : :,,■ . ■ -.v. -v' -v: ::■•■>: miMi fr I'* iv-'f ■ ’•: .*•. •••:-• ■\ t .> ■<• ’• • : •i’ • • • : -t: • 1... - .. V- -t Km--*': 0': ,t ■;"■ SS=;4^,'-- nlK■■•:f:^-v. - ■ V . ■ y A::y.4mm f'ii (!■ ‘■•mmxy XiCyi- : ■x-'x . . •..• .•;■• •. : • ; . X’ ’ nx. ''''■•' ••• i \.-. •■; • ■ 1’v • i'i";.-.li^fw ••..,^^)S>v■:;■• V .:;i.. '. V i.i .A \ .v’' .. . H-■ •■ : : f- ■ ■■ u 0 y . H ■ ■.■■■■; •' •••■In; iVi-'-.yi'.i n ■: ' -y-;;,• ■ ; 4;.. <> 9 m:■■ i5-i«iyv.' ; . -yjf •- • I mm Mx my ■r ;d--v >^=: . mxtm jU! lr^4 y<mx: ^ ••• • mmm ons. in this case for theng, the road and wetlandsd^^® S°h Rubers*! Inforn^atiVn!" Ih^e"’Wanted septic system use to lie regarding this matter for this matter, as was d objected to the future m Road. was concerned about ch encroached into her il authority to do that, to Ms. Peterson that it and provide for future become landlocked. Ms. basing their authority ledicate a "reasonable seded as a result of a ' the dedication of her IS subdivision. Acting explanation and added ^the more need there is was a recommendation nded that Ms. Peterson o further discuss this •ner, Jim Hanson, would »e July 10, 1989 City Sion Meeting adjourned P- mm: mu;’-- ; . -il «4v;Al ; V: r- :■ ■ .,.■ • :?■>. A..1 11'.John R. Gerhardson, Public Wo ks Direct r Jeamne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 29, 1989Subject: Stop Sign at Intersection of Leaf Street i Bayside RoadDuring the review of Application #1411 Sussex Square Development (former Alan Carlson - Senesac property) at 302C Pox Street, neighbors in attendance advised of the near accidents that take place at the above referenced intersection. City staff was asked to determine the need for a stoo sign at said intersection. Staff would appreciate your comments prior to scheduling the application before the August 21st meeting of the Planning Commission. Please advise if you need additional information or have any questions concerning the above request. Nina Wildman, Sussex Square Development Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Glenn Cook, City Engineer li■ss i r ■* . •• \ vr • . 1. r ••••■ -t.•r. Hr-: v“ V'Ai ;Li ' I- mm m -‘r: ; y-;: . m m&m Ml >a. mi '■Ui iiH”: ■ i; '<my K.r* ■liM 'lUi > ■«•• ■■■■.•• -’.V ■' A ■' if • >.;■'• ■ im-r: \\ V* is •••:••. = " , ;.!4' : ;i '•-.'i . j. ; ^ ■.•■ . ' •. / '■=■’ ;-v vv- >■ .. •• i 4 'mMMM ^ i Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & |\J| AssociatesEngln««r» « Archltecu Cltj of Orono Box #6 Cryotal B«7, MN 53323 AttAi Ha. Jeanno Mabuat& Xai FiU Ho. 139 1411 FOx Band V ■■ ^-r.'K... -VvV SiKV-'^ ;■• - ••• i •• ••■' • •. ■ ■• :•*.,■. ■-• -W • •,.•■ ■; .1 . •;.. .: ■•■ V,- f ■■ . .if:' ■; ..^ .V.-;■••■; s .v ■--^"r-v- VV: • V- ■•' ■mMm m mjM~S® — S9 WED 1S:19 BOHESTROO 9> ASSOCI^^TES ROneo •Dnnrfw ^ •mcitw i^MW rt JOKV* C. MfllvHI PfPfc cw. n99^ t C«ML Pf ^^<5^ f Pf•ubeff o ic^VHcm ft MirvP»t irvjn. P|%|P» A tifti Pf •t^NP# \ir pwr PIHaim pi JtpyA tfeAfiaPt M#>« A Nmn PI Ppit pf t iMiarvi Pf •»WP P%flHiiP| 0#a<«0 iMHAPf ^njpt c p|Jbpnn t UjKM Pf l»WP<glP P PfbNP A iftfAP»|Rn Pf mm t iiPl Pf ^NPC fWiM aia Anfut Pf©#«•» i 9army PI mma IM^PI P?»AP i C^aaara Bf Mm n aoch m^*»»Ai41 Ancimiw ArA OmP PyUkAM Pf f»WMA laMtM 4M M PMrttfeynwmm OwSUUPM riMM CPA iisZiS” 's :s, sjs .r:r=i...-s The atorm eever calculatlone indicate a decrease of 40 nercent in «-h. m S t?==TiS=iH.“Er“:' If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, BOSBNl, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC, Clenn R. Cook GRCtli r wHliln; I ...•../- ■L'' 'l-ii'A' . m '* ' .. •* ‘ ASSOCXl^TESG0i«on fit ^^fiWtefit: Mm fittMttf>,fitMMf- tiutmmn, fit. Mt/frtm fit LOMI.M V ^^imarv M MirnjfHC t^nch MJ«mn t fitHgnrev* fi >V^rnor* M Kevi AMMff iM M McffC Iwisrfe AiA AnguiM smta M 01^ X Ido^. PIMOIVA i OvmniMar# n VIOCH fitf Andpnrm A r aMp pyM#w* AfPAarlnA fArH^n LMM figumifiyNitjaM Ow kmn M tfinm c pa Fox Bend devflopaent. Tht i recooimond approval aubjact to »f 40 percant in tha rata of mly significant problea it the the county road elevation. 5 to back 100 year stoma ace 7 or County vould have to ice. (-636-4600 v^p; : fe- ■; 5 ■ ^\ ' -i® oMsm;fevV;:'- 4’ V <■■■"' ►?' ^ v;:f- PSfi.. r- •• •• :)■■:■mm ■K - ■ .• = '■ ■ ■:. •• V -:- ■ = ■. . :..V :t‘ * • ■■;• .= •■ •■•- • •■vi''';;Vo. / ■- • ■:mm m ■raviToiuDatesAugust 22t 1989Subjects Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System TestingSeptic system site evaluations for this 17—lot subdivision hay^een submitted. Additionally# a topographical survey of the property containing a plot of the drainfiold sites has beensubmitted^ tr>^I^uake the following comments regarding each proposed lot: Lot 1, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been located. Both *H*e sites require a mound system due to high seasonal water tables. Slopes range from 2%-6%. These two sites are about 50* from a proposed detention basin# but should not affect nor be affected by that basin. The sites should be totally fenced off with snow fencing before any road or detention basin construction takes place in the stibdivision. Lot 2# Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been located# and both sites have soil and water table conditions to allow for a trench drainfield system. With the proposed house site at the south end of the lot# there should be no problem preserving these sites. Again# the drainfield area should be fenced off to keep all traffic away during road and detention basin construction. Lot 3# Block 1. Again# primary and alternate drainfield sites are sui;,«l'le for trench systems. The two sites are at the rear of : vC. With the most likely house site near the front of the lot# these sites appear to be very suitable. Lot 4# Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are located on the knob at the southwest corner of the property. Both sites require mound systems. With the house site suited for a walk-out to the northeast# a driveway would likely be centered on the lot east of the drainfield sites. Slopes are in the range of 3%# and not accurately reflected by the topographic map. It is critical to totally enclose these sites with snow fence prior to any road construction work# since the sites are very close to the road. Also# road grades and cuts should be reviewed to verify that the roadwork will not cut into site #2. Lot 5# Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are located to the rear of the property on slopes of 0-2%. Both sites require a mound system. With the probable house location centrally located on the lot# these sites appear very suitable. mmi m HinP^V; V. . IV*.. V..- - iSi .•■fi mmm .4 Wmmm l ■ rm* BSlai jm.w,.i * V V/''; .* ■■'■V^ ' [,I ■iminlstrator ling AdministratorSystem Testing-lot subdivision il survey of the sites has been 1 proposed lot t sites have been stem due to high !%o6t. These two ition basinr but •asin. The sites icing before any es place in the lites have been table conditions ith the proposed sre should be no drainfield area way during road nate drainfield two sites are at house site near ear to be very Lnfield sites are of the property, the house site 1 driveway would drainfield sites, irately reflected totally enclose oad construction the road. Also, ) verify that the Lnfield sites are >es of 0-2%. Both I probable house lese sites appear /'■' V t-* _■ _ .*■;X..-;v:•' •' : vC;. :x:v- >■....mmmh-v--:v■■ ••■■ ■•;■■, 1 • ■yjy-'Jyy-V- •■.■=•• ■:.iV.. y -^- :J: •y.-j :V. •■v;;‘;7== =••;mi ■• r. . 1-r -■. ^rPage 2 of 4 Septic System Testingproperty line, Vnd not likely tVb *^V® *^®®r^^'eae sites are locat-A^ affected by construction IfferV^*^ portion of Luce Line T?ail°“^ V^'affect nor be affected by the trail ci have no additional alt., „i,ht locatj^ on tw." Vop”|y been lo^caTe^d^at Si"no^*h"*end ^of sites have reoif®**^ road connection to Leaf st-r^ iot, adjacent to the lot systems, and this is perhtnL ®^*®*J-Ot of this subdivis 1 rin j P®rnaps the most critical from tile proposed house locatlor sites are uphill by proposed road constJictioJ *««ounded on two sides surrounded by snov These sites must Ha The building envelope is laroe In®”^ traffic, constructed leaving apD?oxlm?J-i c^^>*'®^ ® bouse can be ixom the drainfield gi?.! ? ®^^ »ore setback ?.%U-o7V.a ”-ko^‘'d"aS- ?Sun ‘S*ln‘“?nTlSl|.™ - - streiH^lC'^'’^® so«he«t Mrne*r™r*ha ‘'i^"“*“ a«^^®®b- The house site would k.» t ^ ^^® P*^°P®rty near Pox area. The two drainfield sit«% ®!®^®^ ^he pond hi^h® ^^®^ ®*^® ^be only two avall»hf ^®‘*< ^® P^’sserved,both requiring mounds ®^^bes on the prooertv location of drainfield sv<«f-Ani ® technical standpoint! the houae should not caul. a “y pro??eS,f* away from p-re7ty “%*h “v"r*suitable for a trench-type system®^^® would be cTt“S."io%r“^- lo«t\d*^‘„'\r\o%‘d‘e*dTrif With ?h®" Th^os^^sites®are^"®^® ^^®^"^i®ld siteswith the proposed road and near I-Ka generally parallel sites definitely need to Ha e north lot line. These Pre.erv. them dJrin, road co„«\”ct "o”'’ • ■ v-t ‘ ^ . '•;j iMyyy rmwmmmmr:..-i:^m ■rtAAi „em Testingtea are near the rear erected by construction bout 70' back from the J-f and should have no Slopes are virtually \n.°f theinal house location, his property. dralnfield sites have lot, adjacent to the iaos sites both^aps the most critical Leld sites are uphill irrounded on two sides hese sites must be construction traffic. " ® house can be“oo or more setback urther recommend that •ructed within 30* of » contour lines shown jive with elevations drainfleld sites are le property near Pox ed north of the pond I must be preserved, the prooerty, inleal standpoint, IS 300-350* away from ste dralnfield sites .mary site would be ilternate site would 1 in the wooded area ‘te dralnfield sites snerally parallel th lot line. These totally in order to %mm:;-mmmm m .. V V .f M ri; • • • •S'. • ■: mm: ' v ■ ^ '■ -r' ^•4.. r . If: •7 I? . r m-m'- wmfyr> :>v; ■=•:;•: T'- : 'j - h:iiM u Ur. ri r: . : ■:: ' . ^ ■ * • t . :-V\ V- ■■ i' ' / ■'.■■ \ ir^-: ..m wm-lli:Wrl]irrr-:v». = --iL,Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testinq August 22, 1989 Page 3 of 4Lot 5, Block 2. Priiuary and alternate cites are located about a third of the way back into the lot off the road, just above the woods. While additional sites probably could be located in the woods, the sites leave a relatively small building envelope near the road. Again, the sites need to be snow fenced to keep construction traffic off of them. Both sites require mounds. Lot 6, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites, both being mound systems, are located near the north end of the P^®P*J^by near the road. Again, topographic contours vary slightly from those shown on the survey. Slopes range from 3-6%. These sites force the house location to be more centrally located on the property. The sites need to be snow fenced to avoid traffic during road construction. Lot 7, Block 2. Both primary and alternate dralnfield sites are located near the north end of this lot. Both sites require mound systems. The sites allow for great flexibility in house location. Lot 1, Block 3. Primary and alternate dralnfield sites, both being mound systems, have been located on the property. House location would be relatively near the cul-de-sac. The primary site somewhat limits the potential house locations. Lot 2, Block 3. Primary and alternate dralnfield sites, both being mounds, are located near the westerly corner of this property. These sites definitely need to be fenced off during road construction, since they are in a prime **short- cut" area. Lot 3, Block 3. Both primary and alternate sites are located at the extreme east end of the property, leaving 5^®at flexibility in house placement. These sites are not likely to be disturbed during construction of roadways. Lot 4, Block 3. The two dralnfield sites are centrally located on the property, having some significant effect on house placement. The site evaluator anticipated the existing house would be removed, with a newer house placed to the northeast corner of the lot. House placement will have to take into account the dralnfield sites. Both sites require a mound. iLi:- # ^'Ci r mare located f the road, ?bably could ively small Ltes need to iff of them. both being end of the ntours vary I range from to be more need to be :tlon. ifleld sites Both sites for great Leld sites, tie property, ie-sac. The locations. Leld sites, y corner of fenced off ime "short- sites are y, leaving tes are not dways. centrally : effect on Lpated the 3use placed ement will Both sites - '-F -: - aii mmm. '■'•^rl,Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing August 22, 1989 Page 4 of 4General Coeamnts -Each proposed lot appears to have suitable primary and alternate drainfield sites. On some lots, the i-im^ry and alternate sites shotm are the only possible sites avai.a *le. On other lota, it is likely that additional testing could find a number of potential sites, allowing additional flexibility in house placement. In each case, drainfield sites have been designed to meet the minimum 20' setback from property lines, and 75* setbacks from designated wetlands. On the majority of lots, extreme caution must be taken during construction of improvements to the property. Road construction will take place within 50' of tested drainfield sites on at least 6 of 17 lots, and on 2 lots the sites are relatively near the area proposed to be graded to provide a detention basin. I would reconmend that each lot have drainfield sites protected by snow fence totally surrounding the drainfield sites at a distance 20' from the boundaries of each drainiield system. Additionally, when road construction plans are submitted, I would like to review them to determine where road cut would have a potential impact on drainfield sites. Summary - Out of 34 drainfield sites tested, 29 require mound systems and 5 would allow a trench-type system. Each lot has primary and alternate sites designated. It would not be surprising if as many as 20% of the sites ultimately will have to be re-tested due to the buyer's preference for house sites near or conflicting with drainfields. Some lots are extremely limited for potential drainfield sites, others provide a degree of flexibility in house placement. Given the abovu facts, concerns, and constraints, I would recommend approval of the subdivision as proposed. Accompanying this memo is a topographic survey of the preliminary plat showin~ potential house locations and locations of both primary an alternate drainfield sites. piilM . . . .; >-. .;i- •.•■••■.!•'iixl! ■ ii■:.~. ■ ;•■ ^ .;: 'VJ^-.- .- ;.;primary and /rimiry and ai''fole* On :ou^d find a sxibillty inLgned to meet 75' setbacksust be taken perty. Road d drainfield he sites are to provide a /e drainfield he drainfield h drainfield n plans are ie where road s.mound systems iS primary and jrising if as re-tested due ’ conflicting for potential .lity in houseLnts, I would Accompanying ^ plat showln primary an W'r;-vu; f‘~.J • -'=.:• v^-=J~-k#” ■i:-^ii:■.*r ■•*.■, ‘ >-^.>; • >-*! ';..v- •- ; u •■y> If” ,-IS- . \^'H^'■n^r.ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT ■''^ iI CITY II IIORONO ■On the \orth Shore ofLake MinnetonkaPOST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd.Crystal Bay. MN 55323 473-7357 OWNER Larv'er- PERMIT NO.'S. f^CS_______DATES — ADDRESS -^CbC Pc)e Si~ree.h- L I CONTRACTORS P<^ (Thii it ^ an txisting tyicam □ n«w cowttruction) ^ ^ p!wrir. **'*'* rt-Mlw**! <" •»! nwcB r«ating to dM^n. cofwtroction, and location. Aopaw, to bt oparating ”^0 2 ?“**?®* •" currant City standard! for naw conatruction (1978 Coda) but in nton rawacn appaarj to ba dauanad 0 3 ^ not maat currant City itandards in many ratpacts ratating to datign. conttruction, or location. Appesrt to ba ODaratmo tmTwTO.'^ ** ** *"*' •»««"''•< probiami. No maior upgrading of lyitem i. raquirad at O ♦ T conttruction or location, but .a failing to prooarly traat and r*"'- '* -f ■* • »urca of pollution to pirfaca or ro^4™ or d !!!!!f^|7^rnTt^n?^■!■^- " "«w«nr. «>U totting nnll usually ba raquirad. and a datign and sita^«tmull DC submitted for rtviciM. Your con tractor must obtain a permit before wmrk is started. ^ SySTEM CONDITION ( Q) Checked items may require your action) Tank inspection indicateti ^ S« Pumpout not needed at this time. '□ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they shoufd be pump- ed out this year to help prevent future probiemt. □ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks shoufd be pumped out as toon as pouibie. □ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped - Mithin 48 hours to efiminarii surface discharge. JS Inspection risers missing>-«ii^j|gapiaiaii|^|^BBMMHm Inspection risers (4" die. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next pumpout.. “ " D Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle. (Ooee not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks have not been pumped out nnthin the lest three years, they should be pumped out now. Or^field inspection indicates ^^^S^Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. C Some evidence of surfeong, not critical yet. Q Oramfield is saturated end visibly dls^erging untreated effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace* ment or additions to drainfield. Contact tha City Inspector immedietaiy. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. Lj Oramfield extent end condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limitirsg Site Factors □ Slope □ Soil □ High water table G Lot tiae .Sf Lake. or stream G Drainage Potential for System Failure (depends on soil types, water t»^V<4nd system condition) /QlLow /8 Medium G High G System is causing visible surface discharge. rf't v.wtfuiuurii ^S’ys tvrvi COMMENTS; tic System of th« tyttam undtr eurr,m conditiont bmd on ib« tvailabli information. ototmiy,. but it martly an opinion of tha adaquacy Thit rtport muti ba kapt on tha pramisat with tystem location and pumping racordt. WHITE COPY / Intpacior t Fila GOLD COPY / Hom«>wnar Site Capabilities for Future Exoention ^□Adequate G Poor G Inadequate r.-iV-v^-;V mme North Shore of Lake MiunetonkaOFFICE BOX 66 5. Brown Rd. il Bay, MN 55323 357 :tors n a ragular t>atis. The on<sjte stwa9e fi. d location. Appeari to ba optrating ft ratpacts appaars to ba datignad, ba functioning proparly; no major r location. Appears to ba oparating upgrading of system is raouirad at but IS failing to properly treat and n to surface or groundvyatars. or is Inspector to discuss system repair/ aquired, and a design and site plan actly over tank baffle. (Does not »f solids accumulation.) If tanks Rrithin the last three years, they evident. Of critical yet. visibly discharging untreated condition may require replace- aid. Contact the City Inspector completed within 90 days, m unknown. sfer of property, be advised that rely an opinion of the adequacy KP'Vvvi■ SH'•vt-'. f'vVr.1 Ott the North Shore ofLake MinaetonkaSEWAGE TREATMENT ECTION REPORT CITYOFORONO POST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357OWNER*address 3 c* ^ ^ ^UVinicn -----------^, /i «r- •» -...Vr- <7-14 —a CONTRACTORS --------------------- ' prtHMfiy. rMoecti appears to be designed. r—1 <• Meets or e»c»~ w... — ••■MA •_.nrncwriv treat and * -■ ~ adeQuetefy •* ^nr* ------- «'•» . ■ - ,.„„.,ru«ioo Of location, but It «a.im9 ««> ptopativ treat and n ^ Svtrem may Of reay not maa. currant C.ty Td" dilution to «.r*aca or „ound-«r^m cvcTCM rnNOITlON ( a Chackad .tarn, may require your acnonl Tank inspection indicate!: -§^£^iriE%a^r:::□ Solids accumulation m tanka is at a cr dtould be pumped out as soon as possible. , □ Sy«are .t ditebarging to Within 48 hours to eliminate suHace .nsoected. Q Inspection risers missing—tanks cou d t^k in«flMTtion risers (4** die. pipe) must be installed in each ^ «^tXm^t If »nk. haya not baan pumpad out n»th.n SaT« thay d«K.«J ba pumpad out not.. *•^ Should be pumped out now, Orainfield inspection indicates □ Orainfield is dry. no surfaang evdent.g si:rrrrer^d“i.«r ^''*oIirtrdr*n« J^"con^^ City Intpactor ;ri.S;.:irRZr. —t ba com^atad mtb.n 90 dwt. ^ _aM-kdt^itirgn unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors □ Slope □ Soil □ High water table ■Q Lot size □ Lake, wetland, or stream □ Orainaga immeotaieiy. ------------------- ----- Potential for System Failure (depends on soil types, water table, and system condition) □ Low —-^-O Medium □ High □ System is causing visible surface discharge. COMMENTS Qim^wc System Inspector Date of Inspection that ..... .—».>...“ r rjT.z:»r rr»"»:rs»". Thi. report mut. ba k«,. on th. pramua. w.m w«am .ocnon and pumpm, racordt. .. GOLtj COPY / Homeowner WHITE COPY / Inspector's File • % * a* '' *• -'* * '• • •• *w^* •• ■•.•• ■ V ■■...•• 1 ■ V.,''-4's' if.:m.% 1^ p- Site Capabilities for Future Expansion □ Adequate ■Q Fiir □ Poor □ Inadequate ■••A : ‘ - mmi > .-•••■*•• J-a: .•-• •?'• •: TOS Mayor Grabek t Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Oates Jeanne A. Mabusth^ Building t Zoning Administrator August 30, 1989 Subjects #1441 Don Copley, 1185 Tonkawa Road - Variances - Public Hearing Soning Districts - RR-lB approximate area « 28,405 s.f. Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Average lakeshore setback In review of the average lakeshore setback diagram the proposed addition encroachs approximately 1' to 1/2* in front of the average lakeshore setback. Review Exhibit D. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 '■ Hardcover variance required within 75-250' setback area. 75-250' » 18,678 s.f. allowed » 4,670 s.f. or 25% existing - staff 5,516 s.f. or 29.5% applicant 5,516 s.f. or 24.1% proposed staff ■ 5,997 s.f. or 32% (24 s.f. added for steps on lakeside of house see Exhibit H) applicants proposed ■ 5,973 s.f. or 26.1% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - D E F Application Property Owners List Plat Map Average Lakeshore Setback Hardcover Facts Survey Elevations Lakeside Elevations Floor Plan Review of ^>plication - The applicant proposes an addition to the east side of the existing residence satisfying the side setback standard of the LR-lB zoning district at 10'. Per Exhibit D it appears that a portion of the grade level porch and second story balcony projects approximately 1 1/2' in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The addition projects slightly in front of the bay window on the lakeside of the house. "4 P^.V*•■- : ■■■ : = J‘■• .•• •■•.'• ' ■■ ■■■.■ i ■ ' \ -A ''il4f::::: ■'■■"■.■■■,v ninistrator ihore setback >ack diagram the ately 1* to 1/2' (tback. Review ^5-250' setback s.f. added for ast side of the itandard of the appears that a story balcony erage lakeshore Ln front of the fli : M 'i'S^-•!PAj::- : ^ -;S>r H . ■■ ■• • ' r-L-mm •'i. -.,r '-. i X I 9y' ... ; y '..ii-E. mm > ■ .:.' ■ ---O ;*• mmm1t:PP:irPPv‘•5 -=C‘ -V :=.••' ' S T«f5. -•, M ■ . 3U- ■• . .# ' I ’ '■•^U- 1. • . ••'■ It >' ,r ■• 'T . . i .:r ■■'. -p.' '• .v' , V v; ..v:;.: Zoning Pile #1441 August 30, 1989 Page 2 of 2determination of the eetback'irlaVdiYfrrwith'’th“app “^:r“e7.‘lrth\n=*tL^\^\Va°cr-ron“f“ the‘'’ffiw"i“0-75' setback area ■ 9,727 s.f.75-250' setback area « 18,678 s.f.incli^^*staff adjusted the proposed hardcover to Ejhibit H) ■ o' house. (Review room ?n*d^"niie “.“on‘poronn'’“ e°^A.\” Sf/e'rd.'“^‘T”h“" »«.i« or?h:^econd'Un/w7th\a*Jcon^ r t*: property’ The® h^^rdco^^^^^^^ * improvement of theproperty. The hardcover is now shown at a total of 32% Not® there is no hardcover within the 0-75' setback area The citS has received no negative comments from the adjacent’neiqhbors^ windows of the adjacent residences there^will be a negligible impact on lakeward views. CommiMion°llth*ifm/f," Previous actions of the Planningsimilar variance requests, the applicant must be limited®existing hardcover. Total improvements should be limited to a percentage of hardcover. o««uxa oe Options of Action - th® «i* denied Planning Commission should refer tothe necessary findings in Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (B). ccn,lkr*?£r£7lVowlnV«n7in|":"^ Comml..lon may wish to 1. The encroachment of the average lakeshore setback is at 1 to 1 1/2' and will have no negative impact on the lakeward views of the adjacent residences. propS?ty. "® hardcover in the 0-75' setback area on the 3. The proposed total area or size of the residence structure is consistent with the size and area of surrounding residences on adjacent lots of similar size. hardcover amount of the runoff created by the of th^ylrd? property runs to the rear and street side Options of Conditions - a. To maintain total hardcover at existing level at 29 5% requiring the removal o£ 481 ..f. of erl.ting Im^iofemenls 394 .7"7r"20?°e7'of° requiring the removal ofjy* s.r. or 207 s.f. of existing hardcover. B.c ■ • ■■ • • ■•• ■o- \ % ... . .• . • •• ■ itaffslant'sowingsr to sview Ining tster 1 the ' the Note City >ors. will ning tt be d be r to h to c is b on the tnce of the tide ).5% nts S\I wrniim^ f :•- »>*!.• .■■ '•if,- ••••»■ SSSPIW fim' ,' -tMliifliiSEl ‘•. Z": V : /f-'^- . , • i,- = -V*: ■•. ■. V ' -^ . ' ; (V-- • ; i ■;■ -.■ •'-^'r^.: y .< ■* .- ’ !^ .• ;"»* i'*: :':'l iv.^-4 CiZ V,:j, i-;i; * fevf ,; .7.v j 3B5-V .l '. Vr..-;•;•■;•'•• I ■ -4 ■i“ .<!j‘ ■*»•• ■Z'-’;^' ‘ m.Mmm ^^;. . '.Z-J----AZ'.} ’•,' ■ . .■•> •. . '-^.--^rfyV-'-^ k ':Z:- mM:Wmi mZ'-m ■ / ::; ■::;v-,f: .r--i :.v'^:-.^-:^-y ;; tkv ; .s>- V . ,-v Receipt-CITT OP ORONO - VARIAHCS AP LTTOH -4Initial Application Fee $150.00($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00(no change from original applicaUion)After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)1-***'• -. •- * W ^• . “'••A,*)i• . wvv( . f w ar ' ST .- i:s w • \ ^ ^■ L. a w k. # V Vi.i.:-/-.PROPERTY LOCATIOH ► • - « ■ • : i"* V ♦ I"■ A •* W- - fc. V ■»- A \ m I • .• ' • ..*!5^ :- . m, I ’ • Site Address / / /'ci ,>/% it 0 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 7^?:TT> Q.lZ^?S^^ Please checlc one - Property ____ abstract or j^x^torrens?®:Wasafjiwj Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. APPLICABT Name »~p) r, O..''. x-> I ■?./ . Phone (home) - C P:C€ltf Phone (work) T Address; //i'\ :,i /Co OWNER (if different than applicant) Name City: L‘^r< <>■ Zip: 6^d Phone (home) wmmz. Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired (nonth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT OSB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property im . -m Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF RJ Describe request inrequest T Estimated Construction Cost $__________ detail;Rljp,ajjJ-l tmusJir^^ Lot Area Setback Variances ( Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) ^ ' V- ■ '■■' /V mzmzAm r h 1 r i p-':siiS iZZmAmmm$m : 'V;-;'-4 mi *•.*•••• ’ ^ ■/{ '•■■ ^.^Z:.v'■ •!.• {'■"■••••:;-‘ v Jk...L' -. • .L' Sr.iA^l.-ML^ ' .• •.. J.!:. J /.‘ -V •Z.;;-;v^^zm A ■»« d r 1^ Z;^ ■■rmili Z-Zr Bi-2" ••mA HARDSHIPDescrj enforeDBSCRIPTIOIDescrj Code I required si 3. ^ 8. Compl< Certii this : 348-3; Stamp names obtaii CertiJ Topog: in ex Plat I As an any o Add it The Appli remember • informatio Certificat Zoning Off APPLICANT* The appli requested unusua1 ex the infor knowledge. Applicant* OWNERS SIG The owner authorizes agentsr Cc tion and \ Owner's Si Applicant Planning C third Mon review mee o 2C e ZZ::ZZZ¥iM^ZZzZAj'Z;^r - ‘i’' m:mmm tiii- >*.. ■■imsm V' -•'‘V-■■m.'*:■ \ ^fP- =v':iiaiKi^EHiiiiiii "WBceipt-! P.■ • • •’■ •- . -.’j I• a ; w' - -• -. u. f w*. r-«'*. I •-""awI^:yl.'COO_I i " ’ U r.l ; — ■ r l")?*fc. Y *t - , : r *•i k.iS f b> ^ A W V.' « V V^ W ;•♦«•. •}-»f-.•-I / * : ri*/» t ww•: ^ ' ; ' ‘ i•*: < >•“» 1 *.* T • ^X * . W V . U VV, X t k' 4 .*.'*• X• I . .* -• • '_ ^^■^F Pr /year) rildentlal 7 ' . lear) '''''' Rq- A.' 5. r . .-.'a;;' ^ •" ■ \i:^J:> -V .‘ it' .-i ' >“™^“Lribe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:^— ---------------------------------"preventing ccplianc. with ZoningCode Requirements: rbqoired submittals 1. Completed Applicati<^ Form owners within 150* (you must obtain‘■' 5E ‘ussri;;~~.'•■■•■ “ r s™.. in existing grade are proposed. , ,• =4. \ «^hu^"pp°s *“r\?i|n""“° any other persons you wish f® Additional items as may be - - - - - - ^r:elier“t”«' your"5«!iSL°eprii=“tion'!e et^firihe-abo ” information has not been included. «rtIfic«IorbrzonInrDep«^inrthat variance Application is complete. Date _ __ _ _ __Zoning Official's Signature__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - --- - - - - -- APPLICAllT'S SIGHATORE r.t-ov<de all information required orThe applicant hereby agree, to provide all^inlorm ,nd/or requested by the Zoning !^^”reviw o^this Ipplication, and certifies that re’?nfor^a%"ro*n ’.’’u^ned^ i» °Ll oorr^’lct to the best of his/her knowledge. < /oq Applicant’s Signature i iftf^AA) -----2-22 2. / r^wnVf^J^y achovledges t ‘ application !gen?st”o»i«?Sf mem^"r“^nd‘ Counc/l m'embers for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. Date *7/Owner's Signature lO/Wt/ /)fi-----■.___________»_J______ ______—--------------- —— ---------------------------------------------TV /mi a.,, 5S davs before the Applicant must have all f"g°commissiSn°Meetings^ a^rVlieW the Planning Commission Meeting. be present at all scheduled third Monday of each month. ^ Council. If an applicant isreview meetings of the Planning Co^ission and ^^^^ci 1^^ PP^ unable to attend a scheduled ®eeti"9' P^® advise the Building & Zoningauthorized agent attend in your place and to advise tne eui Office of this change prior to the meeting. n V' 4„ ::: / - ■•■■■<'?-'A / ^a:/s.:fe::£saS»p Hrmmm22:^4 y y'2Vvpymm'i||&i2ry P-'-rr-.mm'-rnmM;V-MiiMi mmmm;rmwmmm RUN DATE 07/ZS/9f * BATCH 00^ PROP AOOR Oi'tlER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 58 06-U7-25 01180 TONKAH SiaRLEY J HEND SHIRLEY J HEND 1180 TONKANA R ICNQ LAKE M4 PROP AOOR OWEn NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR 58 08-117-25 01120 T0NKA»> J i A 8EN0T JOHN Q A ANNE 1120 TONKANA F LONO LAKE HN PROP AlilR OHT^R NAHE TAXPAYER NA^’E 'ADDR 58 08-117-25 01185 TOTfCA^ 0 N COPLEY a r OON N A PATSY 1185 TONKANA f LOt40 LAKE HN mtmr i*ii.• >ing from strictnee with Zoning/ou must obtain 603 Govt Centerto each of the address labelsas required, if any changesaparate list of1. ation. Please e if the above I is complete I required or L fees and/or certifies that tt of his/her ion and further [f, consultants, iS of investiga- s before the held on the 1 scheduled applicant is j to have an Lng & Zoning : I.- \■••‘‘v'v’. v’Jv - ' ;«a%'i}.'•V; A *, ' fc • ■* rT Ilf f •r*- >>V^ ■* 'I V-'.^ i *-j . .'vi; • / . .. i*.. •• ;• :•?• S';- IF j^:v.ir::i :-a-w ;:• •.«■ ■ . i^K \-\.i;■ .v->.'tw:i»i..vf.'%■K.* . i n --.v:■:^.'W V '.'in-•■l/*^!’y:* •:Sf.'....»T« ■■!:.;;;5o . -...........te:PPli i»3r;te ;N- .r'-jimm.■■i" ,• >-; •' ■; m-.'■.?:■/jvlla-:'CDRUN OATf 07/Z5/S9 BATCH 007 iSMCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SmEH PROPERTY OlfCRS UST REPORT NO. PX«<!«a01 PAGE 12PROP ADOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 58 08-117-25 IS 0008 01180 TONKAMA RO SHIRLEY J HENDERSON SHIRLEY J leNDERSON 1180 TONKAMA ROAD LONG LAKE »M 55558 58 08-117-25 15 000701180 TOMUkNA RO N T NHEELER A S J HHEELER M T NHEELER I S J t«4EELER 1180 TONKAHA RD long lake MN 55558 58 08-117-25 15 000801180 TONKAHA RD R A K KYLERICHARD A KATHLEEN KYLE 1180 TONKAHA ROAD LONG LAKE ftl 55558Jm^ . Sim*,PROP AOOR OlOCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 08-117-25 IS 0009 01120 TONKAHA RO J A A 8EN0T JOHN 6 A ANNE L BENPT 1120 TONKAHA RO LONG LAKE HN 55358 SO 00-117-25 15 0010 00058 ADDRESS UNASSI8C0 HARVIN BORMAN ETAL MARVIN BORMAN 1800 MIDHEST PLAZA MPLS m 55802 58 08 "7-25 15 001801185 T08KAHA RD G A A DIETZ GEORGE A ANN DIETZ 1185 TONKANA RD LONG LAKE MN 55558 >1 :..'^ PROP AD3R 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER NAP-E/ADOR 58 08-117-25 15 0017 01185 TOTKAHA RD D H COPLEY A P A COPLEY DON N A PATSY A COPLEY 1185 T0M(AHA RO LO« LAKE MN 55558 58 08-117-25 15 0018 01205 TOiCAHA RD THOMAS H SMITH A HXFB THOMAS H SMITH 1205 TONCAHA RD LONG LAKE tM 55558 TOTAL BATCH 007 00008 tn ”.•»•■ ■* ■ .♦ 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF HY KNONLEDGE AIK) BELIEF. DATE ^ «•« A-J-D& €> rTD 6 fT? ^7 e c» : --4"'H-P4f- '•-, : • . > la.-. a mm '.■:■ >: $m •i ' *-■ "■ •■'.•■ K-a .'■•'l .'3 , *,v 3v:: ,-V .:, ; ;; - 3: - V*-: i^r'vV:. >‘i-: "v4 u m .ill b-:| 'if y^r 4? v’yy'^:4s::* •’ t. . ' > ■:i y.;>5 ■?-K" f-'f’ ‘ V '^';i;i:^^: •■i|B ■ ^^’':; v\' ;n;. > - ■ "^“ifilt^.:^C^i':'.::: ^';; ' T* V’ ' 'S ’ : - V!<.; ^.- • rSi.^= t:.->• -•* s J3 I'* 0^ ^::,1 .. r-. ..^:- . .V...• . '^\' V. r : ■ >.■= <u*c.:»r. mt ''jm s..'^; iii:: Mmi l| wim • “*■; V; . v- .-. v'"-/*.;; . ■•/ v> ■* : '|P.S;".**>;'.i'-.>-..A'. m mm fPtpB M mm:::<■<■]:/■--:rW'. v ;;v."#• ■■•■.. ■ ■ .■ '•• ; ,..- < ■• •;a.--^'-« •■ ;Y :■-.■■■ . o ■ :;...'•. :;.. ^ - JKv ■'.::y .v--:^'y ::-^f/- .>=:'■/ ■-’•*■•..'.* » •>V ;■• ••: ' S-^ _________' r :. • •• > . .. -. • ^ •. • .•••.• ■:• ■ V,.... ■ ,r.. .-• ^ ■■ ■ ■" ■«- ^ * i- ^ - ■ ■■ 'J<,‘'= ■••■.' .'. ^; S". :: V '^--' 'r'•--i"'-.v'^ ■;)t^ '■•' ■.■■: -.■.'-V • ^I-I PTI on ;£X1 ST I NO IIAKI) SURrACE;Tract 0, Registered Land Minnesota.Ur i vf^wriy l^'ckKrl IKShedIMtio 20*^0 sq, ft. 2680 sq. ft. 123 sq. ft. 220 sq. ft. 168 sq. ft. 75 sq. ft.• ■ ......i.*2_-'s’=?j|.Survey Mywber 85J, . Qjil^Total Hard Surface * 5516 sq. ft. Tritai Pnrcen of cov^raqe within 75 to 250 fool setback = 24.1 percent if li r=4 .. PROrOSSU HARD GURFArE: Proposed Ho tso Dr i ve Dock 2828 sq. ft. 2880 sq. ft. 91 sq. ft. 168 sq. ft. 5973 sq. ft. Total percent of coveraqe within 75 to 250 foot setback = 2^.1 porcont Note; No hard surface exists within the 0 to /5 foot sctliack.# 144 1 Tl FI CATE OF SURVEY scale : r^^o‘i! BOOK PAGE /n FILE NO SMid'C SHEET OF PREPARED FOR: DONALD COPLEY I ■ .. .»■■ , ■■ ’■■t h iSr' ■nBwBy *KACxil&.r ’■ "J?'v; ::.w.:- V:;A.y: m.wl ■■ rx'y:- iisii^^ I' :• -. -'r .^i->•■:.•'* mm . Vi'S.. k. ■y:.:\y: : ■■ ■■ ■■■»'■W'- i^-. ' ;k4T .;■ k;> v-;S A : •■ TO •;V:^^Vf:'t- >■ ■■■ ^i.■•• •:•:'• • ;:•• '.■“Vv^-''’;V/.■' '^'^^11^1 A--:-;. - ■ ■•>'•:mmvmmmm^:i.-(-.V^\mmSMI;; • i; =;:^;; S'tmmMm BLimjim.- m^A MM ^.<im• J - 1^ *__ - . X /Wf l1 ii I ‘ • \ I; (/ ti:yMwyA ....... id IjaiiSii -■.mm: *3Ki m ':. v:- .:vy--SC'-.K'.' ■ r-B :.=y*-' ■ r-r -'X- ^B.;i-.■■v 'it - '■■ B-.: :.-.-^ /V.'.;, ,::•. . .• := ; ■^ ■ - ■: --. H •. /^••^ -v'*:: ■ ■"? . '■> jtirv ,_. - .."B-r .■,:/>/■ ;■■■■ ' -j J.,:,r*k--..'-r*,;>i------nBiW:f?SP:A; ;Mi f—r ------------ --------r------- -1 n hr ■"I*r-i-if II ..]_.!•_*' ^!’ li" t r t --------||t--T , "7T—IT * ■■ ........ ““■— ' M „ ____1 i ! 1 1jl'Um-■.. ;i-'% •.r I ♦ ’• • /' !DRAILS >i. HEIGHT OPENINGS ORCHES e Approved . Decay Or a mam JS . ••• min; tread DROOM MIL r :quired £N SIDES / li :^.-v .' ■■ . : ■ ■ •- -J:-; •=• ■: -kayallte?®". -T' • «. ..•'^«r.'/ IK, i; --arnmmklA i! r-;;•; . Jpiirn t. VmM li i- amm i If - Q^<[^"^G2ig I- » **WP'''“.S^"->f I. : ■^jar. ; ■,-^ V ■■■^:-- -.y .i /. \ -. . y .-a.■■:■:■ • Tt^iTi itfirftin4,.".-/ : V- ■■ ■•=.V •■■ . ■\*-;- ^..«v' ;.,:i4 its*;-::.CITY OF ORONOBUILDING RERMIT PLAN REVIEWINSPECTORW^RMIT PL/^ nr-Edate ^ _______ PERMIT NO.□ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED W !DRAILS A. HEIGHT 11 OPENINGS ORCHES e Approved . Decay Or •..‘- APPROVED WITH CORRECTIONS AS NOTED ^ NOT APPROVED — CORRECT & RESUBMIT These comments ere tor your inft nation. All worK shall be don« In lull compliance with all applicable building K zoning code rm* Quirements includini] items not specilicalfy noted in this revtow* KEEP THIS PLAN SET ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. pnovini! ATTIC VeilTILATlON EOUALTO 1/iSOTH Ai riC /.i’cA. IF •■.()% OR Molili IS I'iv 'VIDCD l. i U'.'PLll PORTION OP 0r ^ ‘ ‘^ ' *•' ---L-Ul.'i PROVIDcD ITLSOrTIT VUi'TiS, K MAY CSSREDUCED TO 1/300TH ATTIC AREA- ' ,MIN.‘ TREAD OROOM iiAiL r :quired EN SIDES 10H *II IIIII11^ r~7^ 'Try J: r— " r • "W-:- ,‘ ’: :;• ', • lF t -/,.• • 4 ; : - /, ': r-; •-;" -f ■ ./i^v ■'■rfir Ura-^aa-:yaMW- m \'y:* [■■■’■/ iL-^y4K.:1Jv ., .^^v^< : r' ■.=:; : - :■■: ■ ifki, ..:'4 :■. ■ ■:. iyyiyyMyyay m-y -•f '• ^ V I- 4. I ‘V * *4\i h» . 1?*i 4T^T <i'^! i T • ♦ ^jVl-: ' V.I*.. -•-f' S ,¥’i.i..*■ r V.. ,4/ *-*Lj . ; ♦ ' • r ^ • ^ ' < i> !♦ ' -1 £1^^. / OF ORONO ^ \J PLAN REVIEW PCRMIT NO. D AS SUBMITTED D WITH CORRECTIONS AS NOTED f^OVED — CORRECT & RESUBMIT are lor your Inti ^nation. All work shall be done i with all applicable building & zoning code re* Jint* Items not specifically noted In this revleei* , PUN SET ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. ATION EQUAL TO fin% OR lj:-PLn PORTION is provided AVli^MlEDlJCED ilHli e % •• m. ■n wmmm .V*’, ^s- A'..' ■■* V ....... ti'-o’ f I-?;tT .Xk..— AJL 4 I' " t v;T^ i V: ID I -» ■ 1 ,' '' \ ' ■ ‘• ' M' * . I '■tf♦' » ;-A ^, / Taliv!3<*--.,V" ■ '■••VI I *v " T \ \ \ l*’£44^ r 1 1r ■'---------j;W..4, ;t ; - r ! p«4i* «»«n UXi. r- !. N 1 \ 1 1 1 •'V1/ , ' 1 1 1 1 1 y. I-------------- i 1 1 \ 1*1 t i i i 1 I a -- a ii-lj n-oof.- t /\ht TUP ,{1.(fviStijJS TU*»” '1 .. 4 :|V'* .<; f -4,1 ------- • ? •rym,f • I / • f ’iHm: vrSPfc ,5‘ " ■» 1 -21 • •*■■» iiiy •:*1 Ifi:. •ia t * • < uiyiNi^ I •I < r i 1.1 • t • t \ IIM • « Mf !']• ; '.I > j.!. . • ■.- , r w 3 —-IL:-lMtrr:. J S -N • ■• \ i.- ■' . fm f ; '"I?# • tr ' ------------------------------------------------ ■ ...1^..%. ; ='■■ i (■* ' J aL (SVlSTi/J6 I i: I mi . ^ 1 ^ J.. •: V.A m * i'll i ••. f i t \ ***“ !< t ii. ' 4 *1: ..1 J * t T ♦*# r.'^ r.“^- -,v»r.P Stl Of !' T 0 'i i ••j i \ \ irt'o—^ ii^ nr V 7 —N dUii(y I: /■• I’ ■i. Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Plannln9 Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building i Zoning Administrator August 29r 1989 Sobjecb: #1443 John Skoglund, 1840 Fox Street - Variances ~ Public Hearing Boning Districts - RR-IB ’subdivUion 9 (D) - setback variance required as house structure are set in front of the front line o£ the principal structure. Section 10.02, Definition 39 - nsrY;YY ‘\r..rY;;::nvir{‘.«^ lot are eoual, the front lot line shall be designated by the owner and filed in the office of the Building Inspector. of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit I - Exhibit J - C D E F Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's Addendum Permit #5150 Pool Permit Survey for Original Terrace S Floor Plan - Original Layout Survey Reflecting Existing Construction Site Plan - Proposed Pool & Pool House Elevations Pool Review of Application - Review Exhibits F, G and H. The the former deck and pool constructed in the west and front yara in 1983. It is the applicants current plan to install a Pool and pool house in approxLately the X oermit ofCity files it is not clear under what directives the permit 1983 was issued. But in review of the survey. Exhibit F, it ippears that the permit may have been issued o" ^le the terrace and pool where attached to the principal structure. Clearl^ the current proposal involves detached accessory siruftures Review Exhibit D. Applicant's attorney has asked Jhl city to define the front lot line for this property as access IK-: : i "-il•.■‘•.•'••..’I ,-uP^B , J; r-.: M’i strator lol and pool ront line of ixisting or case of a tensions on if a corner shall be e office of tion use las removed front yard L a pool and viewing the e permit of libit P, it basis that L structure. 1 accessory ly has asked by as access M r>- • .•> ' V mrnm *■ I :»■ I >■ mMmL,,: V ' ;,.>;vr:v r •4-.i S-. » |C;;yy ■'m k^M --f4? .'■'f ■ ■••. : ■ ■. : .S‘ mkk '',y yy •'i'y>''' '-H-..;. V,: •.•>y.^. ^ .-:;.J •:• . '* ■■-. •>•■•;,-y vy- ; :■"• • ■': E* ll-'” ■ "-.fl k 1^;:,.> V;"^' X»4.x. .::->:.rv^ ;■ y :V-.-.';-:. ^^. ■ ': ,•* • ■■*• * Zoning Pile #1443 August 29, 1989 Page 2 of 3to the site is via tlie west lot line. The front of the house has been designed to face the west lot line. Mr. Talyor also called attention to the fact that the access drive is paved and provides access to Brown Road and if property to the west is developed this would be more then likely the location of a future private road. The City must deal with the facts at hand. The property could not be classified as a corner lot. Please review definition of a front lot line noced above. The lot line adjacent to Fox Street (south lot line) is clearly the front lot line. East and west sides are side lot lines and the rear is the north lot line. In order to meet the requirements oZ the code the proposed pool house and pool would have to be setback 120' from the front lot line. The pool house is located approximately 35' in front of the prinicpal structure, review Exhibit I. Review of Finding a Hardships - Applicants addendum notes the following findings and hardships: 1. Access to house is from the west. House was designed with west line as front. 2. Basic house and terrace decks were all located with City approval of alignment and setbacks in 1983. Pool is basically being reconstructed approximately in the same location as original one approved by the City. 3. To move the pool house to the west or the front of the house would hinder the views from the front view windows and detract from the character of the home. 4. House is well screened from Fox Street on the south and to the east. Staff would like to add the following findings noted during the inspection of the site. 1. The higher elevations to the east and the heavy plantings to the east lessen the impact of the structure placed in the front yard. 2. Location of septic system to the north and west and the required 20' setback separation from drainfleld places several limitations on the botal realignment of pool and pool house behind 120' setback line. Options of Action - 1. Denial. If variance setback is to be denied. Planning Commission must reference neccesary findings in Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A). M Zoning Pile #1443 August 29, 1989 Page 3 of 3consider hardships and fCoromission may wish to houo«^an/re1iing°poo “" ®«lntatned botveen proposed pool adJ,ce*nt‘’ii'poo‘l on"'‘.oath"'’"‘"'^ P^«"‘ •»rubs lessee i^pacrof tl°o“ sto°ry structure'*” yKgj^ :it". ^ : V.--i ■ ": mmt.- .. ... mm fcwr mMr Pwi M'kI r ... . g - ' ..••m > .•■' ..-*! mm ■•'■■.■ -S ■' > .- . .. V.:- ., •; '•v-V'i'm ■> -i : V-, ■.-.. . .-.• • y!•• .• :.v .:.^^;y?f t*;. m$m •: >-..;vvr. .»:-i. ; V - yy '•Sk .. , .•n •'1^1 '4 ?» CITYIniti($:Rene%(ncAftei Attac requd appl: ONNSl PRB^d? ' DBSa VARXJ m- nay wish to roval would sposed pool int shrubs : sides to Initial Application Fee $150.00($50.00 per each additional variano Renewal Variance Pee $75.00PR0PSRT7 LOCATIOH Site Address 1340 Fox Street Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) PID 03-117-^3-4^-a£08 Please check one - Property X_ abstract or - - torrens? « «i> !. ''V V V . *w Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ Phone (home) 941-1144 476-1000 _ _ Phone (work)_ _ _ r‘ '*.*: •• • APPLICANT Name John C. Skoglund and Address; 1340 Fox Street_ _ _ omiBR (if different than applicant) Name_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- City; Long Lake Phone (home)__ Zip*iLilL_— Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired October igSi (month/year) I (dJW (do not) also own the »<3jacentjarcels^of^land. PRB^ISIT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property RRIB_ _ _ Rinale Family Reiidential _ _ _ _ _ _Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ OESCBIPMOH OF FBQOIST E.ti«t.d Construction Cost Oascribe request in detailSee Add^ yj^RlAHCBS RBt^JIRBD Lot Area Setback Variances (_21 Lot Width Front Hardcover Side _____ Rear) Ordinance Interpretation and Application to UniflUS Prnpprt.^ ll • ■ "■''T v;: - wmjim- . ■■ .<-v .. > • : " V - A • . ■ "■s : .= .^7 -v ''.y : ,M : '"ii m0 ■ • •... '.re.' " ■"‘■7 7'"v ; % ' '"-■ '>'i^b ;.:r-*a ■■ :“:1 ..■;v-:i:.',:r;:i;’';vv>i^!;‘S''^ |PPSf«ifeSJ»ls:wa• >^ i; ^ •■■■,; i ' - 4 -vv'4'v^i^i - ■; :¥;■- vf- il*''-‘iill:-) f. - ■' •; >,.■, :' /■ :-■■• ■ • ' ’■ -V .- ■ l^pii KSkip'?^^^ nuppiy mm mm !■.•••••■.•■■• ■’* \%i W^m jHpp mlii * ,:j Pik'KiSS:: m^: :j-; .'y•: ■ r1^^ i ■■■■.!• >;..' -v-i ,v-'v; ■■■ /. j H •IV::..4 r-r «t .f; k\». ■™“ss;.r:; ss‘f4.«;;;;;rp;^'o;."a^'i^f"^^~^SSrpr.v.ntin, co»pXUn« wit. »on^Describe unusual p P ;vHr!<»ndum —------------------ ■--Code Requirs^*^^**— ________________________________—BBQOIRBD submittals . form «<4-hin 150' (yo'* must obtain' 1I5S=«S.SSS names on ^J'®. * ® ,rty owners list). calculations as required. u.t of U In .aa.n.1® to of this appUcstion. iJy othar por«n. yo^«ji ny City ataff. - - - - - - - “<>^!i!“Li!“!-^“-------r"--:-;r,; thi. appuc- 3. any o^n«i fc'«----- - „ requesx.ea wj----- --------------------------*. Maltional itams .._«y_“„J --------rrVnT. ippUcstlPn- Pl«« ilfo^tion^has^not^been^ i. complete. Certification by Zoning Depar_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^ _ _ _ _ _,_— Zoni g_0£ficiarsji^ature^^--------------------- appialCAMT'S SIGM^TORB *arees to provide all all fees and/or Sr*n*oS:?ron «”pU.a l. tm. ana corr.ct Icnowledge. ^ ^ ^ Date July —1989^^ Applicant • ----^ -joh«^. Skogiuna ^ -„rther gmOKS SIomWM ,e3jowlea^ ana agrees *° *''^* City Vtaff^" The owner ,„try onto t>-.e P'°P***/„*^’for purposes of Investigai^«7 ana council n^ts for purp tir Jia=- “f’/cation o^ ^ owner's Sig2»^“fV3rr^^*^5^^S®*^®5^^^J^^VfVices 25 d»y» ;^ric«Vi.ust M« ;^^i^^“J^iSrcu«i”^'y' “Ve^t at ” I ’•'=*''"l"^lt ?i!fa^M'o«‘i1? o7 «ch nonth. ^ xii: it :: .avis, the Buiiam,. Sfflle^of^thirchange prior to the neeting. « M .:p ¥; : ■■ ■y.-.:^4 m^ <■ / . ••..•:.L • c'^'■' i;.. .,;4 u ■p^.v A aP/ '. . :+»V mP.'^ ti-f..-..■ip:':"- my ;t:"\ VvvaftAiyi ;^.s- • • -tV‘^ j. ■•' 'r i;!: V' •'. ■• a , * e '.u n •v-.- * e'- * 1 y%W f' - M- bii •r 4^ • ’.T .-. r r:v :....■ i..,:.^ ■:■ '■■y - . PjS-m. "-A ■>*■■ •-■■ ■■ iVV F;V ' i V >= '.. .‘-J myp 4£1•*W< DATE 07/24/89batch 002PROP AOOR »<NER MRHEtaxpayername/aoor 3« 05-n;01880 F( HM L HALOf HIUIAM L 1080 FOX S HAVZATA HH PROP AOOR 0**«R NAME taxpayer NAME/AODR 38 05-11 01820 Fi CHARLES N CHARLES N 1820 FOX ! HAYZATA (* . :Jy: V PROP AOOR 0W«R NAME TAXPAYER N*»«/APSR total batch •-: i| f |,4 '■...••• -‘Vi^ ( ■:. •••=v:V"- ^V "■■••from strictwith Zoningmust obtain Govt Centereach of the ress labelsrequired.any changes rate list of ion. Please if the above ■fc-V: .X s complete , required or L fees and/or certifies that ,t of his/her Tilv 27. 1989__ on and further consultants» , of investiga- ,.w 21. 1989 _ days before the are held on the all scheduled an applicant is ents to have an ilding * Zoning i y;;y= ' /.V 'Wv«s WMyi- 7m 'i Jl ■■'w mmm /v^;- :.; .••;■ v_y • .-.V ’ =;•A:';*: "'y: •■=:'■■■■••^.' -=v' •'. t :.. . ^iiiiiiPROP AOOR OtCR NAME TAXPAYER MAME/AOORPROP AOOR (MCR NAMEtaxpayerNRHE/AODR oiee”L NALORON ETAL HILLIAM t HALDRON I860 FOX ST HAYZATA HN 5SJ9ICHARLES N MARVIN CHARLES N MARVIN 1820 FOX STREET MAYZATA m 5SS91 M 05-m-2T A2 0007 01860 FOX ST NILLIAM L NALORON ETAL nilLIAM L NALORON I860 FOX ST HAYZATA m 55391'** °®01*m>REss u«ssio«oSUAO H AZHARI SUAO H AZHARI 1795 FOX ST HAYZATA MF 55391 report no. PI43540I PAO: 5A900 IDS TONER MP*.S mN 554020192” *fw”t^’P H mtson a j h ashoonnASHOOWF1925 fox ST HAYZATA MN 55391PROP AOOR onner name taxpayer mais /ap .or total batch 002 00006 II ^ i r- v^: i| I ••'!• V m rt IT rv ■■ \ 'Vi ^ " ! REPAiSENTATim 0r*iNF0ftM*TlOM*f^”ir*.**® *** ‘CCUInrE MO TIR* ■%c>v'';vo f-itBSi'*;" ■' '■■ "■•.■4•'-I k" ■-M-'sH-r- /' ■::*■ -^V't-'/v^^: ■• .m““r‘S^V' ““ 4900 103 TOWER MfXS MN S5902 f«S1 i JsST" 1925 FOX ST HAYZATA HN 553,1 ».-. '::.k.ii •5^^.i ■» £ • ::• ; .• V 4fe - ' :. . v • ^-:-" •• / • v2i • = - r • '• :•= ' ••: ‘. pi A- ^ '■- •••.••. :A-'t! '■■■■ .‘^■■■■. - : • ::i '' iKff >:-: ■/:■••. :v ^^.■..vv:0v^-if-i • ':-i--; :> • .-v - ^.*'-jp i v ' ‘ i: / • vli • =.' -r: ■ ■'. y ■ . ••■ . .•7^'.r• ^.::'-vV-■ V ;• -^v :• :v«-: =• ^ . 'V yy- 7:;::,-7*77:r7:,. .7;)v ‘-■:7;7v. ’*■’: = K \ •; V- •" -:7-^';-;: =.•/ W3»;: • . '. •t. ' ‘*’s; iAV-7-' :-c; ■; « i'-7 =.-::;7-.- DESCRIPTION ADDENDUM TO VARIANCE APPLICATION 1840 Fox Street John C. SkoglundREQUEST: Owner desiresexisting house, consisting of a reconstructed swimming pool and new pool house. House faces wester’/. South lot line is north line of Fox Street, a public street. Access to house is not directly from Fox Street, but is from private drive or roadway west of the lot which rough’/ parallels the west line, and enters property at northwest corner, circling northeast, east and south to the circu,-term around lortheast of the house. Main portion of private roud proceeds north to serve property owner to north. It is a wide, asphalt drive. This private drive also proceeds west from in front of house to the north and goes west to Brown Road. East-west portion of private drive is not paved. Main portion of house if 60 feet from west lot line, and even after new room addition on the south side will be about 120 feet from north line of Fox Street on the south. Open terrace and deck area now existing are approximately 30 feet from west line and 95 feet from north line of Fox Street. Proposed new pool and pool house are to be approximately 57 feet from west line, and approximately 83 feet from north line of Fox Street. Therefore, the requested pool and pool house would be i) approximately 3 feet nearer the west line than the main house, but would still be substantially easterly the most westerly edge of the existing terrace and deck; and li) approximately 37 feet nearer the north line of Fox Street than the main house after the addition. HARf SHIP; Access to house is from the west. House was orTfinally designed with west line as the "front." Access to the lot is from northwest of the house. Basic house and terraced decks were all located with C’cy approval of alignment, vCt backs, etc. in 1983. Pool is being reconstructed in approximately the same location as originally approved by the City. Pool house is the only new accessory building. It must be located near the pool. Only other location ate west and north of the pool. Both locations would cut off the view and seriously mar the "front" of the home. Only possible location is south east of the pool. iitions to uning pool le of Fox lirectly from rest of the ;ers property south to Main portion >wner to [ drive also and goes drive is e, and even about 120 iraately 30 Fox Street. mately 57 m north line e than the ally easterly errace and ine of Fox ition. e was Access house and of alignment# ted in oved by the ng. It must west and he view and ble location r.-M.m" pool and terrace would not Pe ^“iceagJe'a^d^r obtr«"e"‘" «« O' -0 la well rie:t:^?-^pu^i1|,^1'e%'l -^"rolLaf. tUi «=«a°' ’ “™*«‘'hrs°jLj:t " ?^jr?i°'*'"ody'’cSos%„ wen withxn a front yard set back there? Street, Iront ',ard set Pact lro„ The improvements. The followxng attachments are mace a part of this IT^' • 1. Certified Property Owner's List ^^^^tion: of the names?^ sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to all Current survey of Property dated June 13, 1989. Plat map. 5. Additional items: (a) Plannii^g^rZo^iJg°AjJinig®J^ Assistant wxth copy Of February 22"'?98?"survi;"a?tM' of proposed h^use^and'^pr^posL^'^rr^'^^^^ SS'^n'd'pSoU Drawi nrf ______ ana to City of 0??no^with"’BJildinS^P submitted for construction of house in l983''Trpages K - 2 - iipe-ss:mm-m •:■• V--;V ■•■-■;:■ .' V: ■.’ : ". '.:•• • ■ :'-= it:. ■•••• .■ ■■“ '1 placement of house well screened from f and trees, it is resents a pleasing >ol house southeasterly ■e and/or obtrusive. west of lot is well north of this lot a logical, dedicated as out to Brown Road to determine that ice of front yards chosen » uhe line from which made, the swimming itruction would be t, would not conflict Zoning Code, and rom Fox Street, d set back from and new pool house, Cxty originally *30 foot set back improvements. this Application: -addressed to all / 1989. on. Assistant ed July 10, 1939 y attached. 83, showing location ce, deck and pool. lot submitted t Application pages). ii:The zoning district does not require hardcover calculations for no changes in existing grade are proposed. 'SPV - 3 - I, ■ ■ ....................tr v, . ' 'V •«> ■ V . V -a; :■ ||||§|g feki: v-.v^"r • • V • > i IPI f*-.- Vj '■ •’■■ ■ .!.V /: ••-.r ’.m . . >. •IP ■ . •■ V-- M 113 V Wm '■T •1ft- 4aP'm'! <r.- >i\ >.:T^ ' f 1 of OROXO ^R««iT N? ^ 51501Iding Permit oati —/0^0-£S jPPLICATIONFO" CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY EXW8ES---------OX M. CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 j^i^Q A ^ ^NG DISTRICT srrt AOORCSSlegal OfSCRIFTION: FRCP. 10 -----5L0CX A^Hi^CT.^iNKr-iSr^ lAiWt-Fawt. Cmmmtrn A TFS im .—. ^ . ,(FHi»r smoivislow miMi '§ •T4^7^^Ag77^J» i<?A» xi/osuy^ir :na-g ■■■--■*'■:■/rO KT. OONir. VAUMT10W ►* •» ' .ITATI *..,. i-.i IjmTSfrr! j iv?;PECnON REQUIRED rOOTINO Mf«* pour _____niAMtNO romMA _____INSUiATION _____WALLMAHO Tiplfii iA. riNAL bf«o»« OR von»< acTONO OA arrrMOUT a At- :ui'^EO Wja gCTtOA WttL tt SUt» .ec^ TO gfNALTY. 5 **fW»ECnO« MOUAS 473.75a? CM.ua . 12 A.KI. IIWA. 1-4 AJA C ALL I • 4 PM. imp. NCXT DAY WORK REQUIRIURT SEPARATE PERMITS ALUMaiNO MfCMANiCAL WILL______ 8IATIC WATCA OAAOIMAAIUINO ' "*• - ‘v:'' •• ■'••'.-’•v’ACIWokfl TNt UlMRMNniWRiirM------- THt RIAL MWROU ..OiCiPlirtlt^jfe f-* ,R \mom Afft4tTYw^^wRw>. ■■ ANea OF- ALL JRW>RIIAT<^ Mtffra AtPAiiiNtfO on boanfcitrf^ MNOL nMfTMIR AORmterOo'li^TA^ AUANCtWm WMITC-Aiae CAlfl4-#HllAWCi CANAAV-INSACCTOA COLO-AfCflAT pfAK-AssaasoA ^MMNMOr .« •'A .V • 1 • < 4 r «A.** - 7- ••»K-* :^A. >:=■ ■ /W * -r9b;^ wjfjar ~^^i.ffT. oomr. VAUMTION m •: ^oblPtlMiftii^: ,V-. . •• :<«tATc , r; ^ ?S^'2.. -^u\ - -- ■^.■~;.*»fS3;;,r': IMM.iktHk«lA«£ib*AA - . 1 ICIfTlD Oil TTf» Ml AonmtcrM)C^Mi|tf L>'i ■^.TT!.it' =v^r‘^ , •r ■' •'■ <» ^',WTii; ^ i-- ^ •.>• • t:,;". 'Vv ; .. *. •■ • 5ju..,.a.,-*4fc ■ ■--•;■■ v:.‘.-■ • • '•• ” •,:^... - \:-V*. ■/. ?%»tj?-;t>iii,.»r •: * ‘ •* * *>5 ^ ^,,• **. ■••^»«#^ »*»*^|♦ 4. ... . -ii. • *1 » vnJ«.. f* T** “ fwi* ‘ I t I ’ ^ i *. j ^ *! • • f • 1 ii i^r f I'* ‘ ^ ‘ » ^ . *,:! *. r '• ‘ '»• iir I ’ill*!** !r • It »ur ’^ri t4* r ♦,•'’! 1:•K.“r* r ^r *r.r**^* ••' f * • Of O N rt. <‘CfM»: (X.., i::r. ■x'..". L" - / • LV,'- ; ,s..a y “:■..*••■ *. :.V. .. V i’- ;'. /•■<*■ ' ’ll w& . ■ it -y :s»iiii \ tMmm tm Iz . ^S: rnsmsmimm tSM ' ■-^>• .;...a a-S 4 f*naa:§?' Mi m y'm fsiyf.. ... r'-'v--.: / : K l.‘il- ir ».,» I »r S f t i- ^ M . * rrv.l* »r.. 1 :i ? • ;. ■ t j •.» • » f ill , i!* - tv, r-'-. » ^‘^;r ot t «::.* • r * r r cc., i::c. * ;i : I *r ' M Vi 9 • 1 :i *.rr \r “V-j ••-• rr-. ) I t» • r- j- •*i •• 0^ wmmm iSia7^,aHi ?•' ■■■■ .•■••>: ■- ■; ; ^;Vi; ■■ i •-¥: 1 ■ .-3: m iV''''-’ ■ -■' kW», ®S“<. V. m^mm „■' ■ ■ V'..- __________ .::ymmm >3T <■< \'-_ V '7^^' ■‘ -i! „ ‘ •*. ’ V 7;.' < • *■ ■ f ■' ' ■■ -• 'iv : = ■'• ■ - ••: ■ ■-:. . : M J 1^ miml '.r:: Isk'v Cert!f icate of Sunrcy for McNulty Construction of Lot 1. Block i. HI-ACRES TWO Hennepin County. Minnesota . /»C7- / r:im 1:^ P" Ml •vi :■(L (i M %f •• 1.Mm.. ■■'i . ■ . P 1 ^ >-r. ■ r; •• M a7' S^rte-f I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repre- ientation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 1, Block 1, HI-ACRES TWO. Henne­ pin County, Ml'^nesota, and the location of any build­ ings located thereon and also the proposed location of any additions to said buildings. It does not pur­ port to show any other im­ provements or encroachments. COFFIN 5 GRONDERG. INC. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Mark S..Gronb'erg ffn. Lie. No. T?7F5 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake. Minnesota Scale Date 0 1 inch = 50 feet 6-13-89 Iron marker I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repre­ sentation of a survey boundaries of Lot 1, Block 1, HI-ACRES TWO, Henne­ pin County, Minnesota, and the location or any build­ ings located thereon and also the proposed location of any additions to said buildings. It does not pur­ port to show any other im­ provements or encroachments. COFFIN 8 GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg fin. Lie.Gronoerg fTn. tic. No. T2755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Scale Date o 1 inch = 50 feet 6-13-89 JUrojOLJttAJtkfijr ■y - ■ > A v.^ -i. ' ■ • - - —• .. lrr-.ticr. 3nl3Ti-- if mrT, . rr*:--.::, tinz v.i rra .-ut 3^52 rxt rurrarl Zc ^ v?4?=r^T- t-s^' SSsWllJBT®llCWflWM wtsmmyi * «♦ •-. •: ••'•■■ V." '-4 r'V/-C/.V. «V.. 1^'- ■'■“7-^>' <-,j^^;2ArroAi jE.^ ta ** 1 ] •■; ■ V'v V >:^'y ■ ■: £^■5 I "r ■■ / r<^OL fool. ffCMS^ y/y^^T E.^ 5r7«i<crUfl:e?^ f=»ooU mMi 1, OTHtr<C €*A^b' ern+'e^ -ji . 40uii€- /^ufS.’T&€' "■ \'-‘ ♦.! ....^ Af99'se-^J £ £/g.fa STjR££r 'w . • • • n-•. . % “ V ' • •;vy#;v:v^ ■’. i: «r:^' ^=0; v;-i7. - " ■ • ■■■' \ -- '■■■ ■.’.'‘JiMmi2 ■ Ms YYi. ■:•. =‘-iv'-. ■i?: ;■; i? ■hx.l ts r..' s-ia >• f^' ■..%._ I u- -.^ :V^7-vy •r !^if ■ ■ ■"■ v'..y 4i.'ff-'■ ■■' V %': ' '. . .•••-. -.f i --. ; . .i< JJ.-V; ;■ ;,.Y.....--v^;-r. . -.-■: • '/mvA...ysim ' ■■^ '-;v !wr;4?i ®*V - r• *. * .••* *■’.■' '.'•C.'.-•■ C>‘-: -..■•■•V■;:■ V rv.s«m... ■ ' tb . ,►.'■■■■ 4* --’O';-. . .^y:-^_:;-.";;vv:ia .. :. . • . .... - • " \ :ri: .: -■ ..iU " ...K -• ~^%>wMayor Grabak & Orono Council Members Planning Connission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Nabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 29» 1989 #1445 Gregory Peterson, 1355 Arbor Street - Conditional Use Permit - Variance - Public Hearing Xoalngi District - RR>1B, Required * 2 acres Existing 14,000 s.f. JlHlftlEllllKM ■ iliCROFllMEO iNrtinent Ordinances ^ Section 10.28, Subdlvidion S (B) - Side yard variance required ■ ;*0* __ proposed » lii— variance -j^^l' or 37% Qla . 4., coverage (accessoryReview amendment) Allowed ■ 2,100 s.f or 15% Proposed - 2,068 s.f. or 14.7% - (pool area not Included because a fence 6' or greater in height is not proposed) Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 ** Condition Use Permit required for accessory buildings through lots located in residential districts. or^r^ Section 10.75, Subdivision 4 (B) - Yards A - Through lots in any districts shall have front yard on each street, required • 50' proposed ■ 24' 9" (Pool structure) variance *25' 3" or 50% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application HOv^Slf /A W4J5V- Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Spec Sheet on Pool Foundation Plan Floor Plan West Elevation __ _ _ _ _ North/South Elevations Exhibit J - Staff Sketch Approximate Location of Principal Structures on Surrounding Lots Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D E F G H I Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit 'mm I-. *■mmrn1.71, lit.'- sning Administrator &or Street - ce - Public Rearing ry structure ordinance 7% - ;pool area not eater in height la not accessory buildings on districts. ards shall have a required re) I Location of Principal ■,v^ •i ■ ■ :^mm 0WM r - • A*mm:. MSk% "■?■■ ■■■■ X\ mmm mmm■r?^:m m::.ymr£:■:■ ^?r.:yyr^--P^...' ••m Sv’-'-■"-aas h. r 'y:'^Wtiy:\ : ■••••'V-■■:'**'!•■• y--; * •' v<imMim: Zoning File 11445 August 29, 1989 Page 2 of 2Review of Appllcetioo -The applicant proposes construction of an attached 15 x 18* screen porch to the rear or west side of the existing residence and a proposed pool* accessory structure in the rear yard* 10* as required from the proposed porch addition. Total pool area including decking adjacent to pool is 1080 s.f. (actual water area 648 s.f.). Fencing will not be proposed along the pool as the yard is surrounded with fencing. Natural pantings are within this yard and the yard to the south (most impacted by the pool). Please review Exhibit J* staff's sketch that locates approximate location of house structures of the residences on the surrounding lots. Note that the house to the immediate south is located approximately 20* * from the street right~of~way. Pr^>osed pool is 24' 9" frcan the Briar street right-of-way. The lot to the immediate north has a principal residence located in line with residence on applicants lot. Per new accessory structure ordinance the proposed pool without fencing meets the required 10' setback for a detached accessory structure. Options of Action - Denial - If application is to be denied please use the necessary findings in Section 10.08* Subdivision 3 (A). Approval - If approved the following findings or hardships nay be considered in your formal recommendation. 1. Proposed pool would be in line with the house on adjacent lot that fronts on Brair Street. 2. The proposed pool meets the required sideyard setback for a pool structure without 6' high or greater fencing. 3. The total lot coverage with addition remains below the allowed 15% at 2*068 s.f. or 14.7%. 4. The existing principal structure is located 12' 9” from the north side lot line. The proposed addition will be 19' from the north lot line .u: :r - ^ ^' wmymm mm wmy S:-f S mm ■r wmm.- '- m :•■••: . W: ■ ■■ . y.'m i-":;- V m •■'ll 'T f ;..:v ' *>S;f I-:;v' • ■ i'. .V.-' ■ -V ■^ -AW.h^f W CITI OF OtOKJ - FMIMCS AFFtlCiTIOl T ^ / ^••:Vrnyys^msan-'fc-'al Acciicaticn F«« $150.00 (S50.00 per eac« adw*--ona 3 J..•w-i Variance Fee $75.00aenewii Variance cation) t r w*** pbofbbtt Lcicaiio* Site Address—1 *^5 ^ ^ a 11") "^1 oOSSi - Srop.n:7 Identifxoat.oB _____ ^iea»« --------------- - «i 4f'r if not included ca A0-.ach l.?ax d..=ri?t:i=n to .ppXioat-on ^ _________ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------— ■ " APPLICAHT rv VlALN3M. Address LC V ' ' --------------------- Phone (work)Phone twoiTj^ J « ■ —-------- "•“ ^dA..^.Oay^<v if"different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Address: Phone (work) City:* — Date Property Acquired J (mcnth/year) I (do) ((g'goT) also_W^^ej^2a=-“;.^ PSESZST OS2 OP PROPERTY ^ p a Pr...Bt zoning District -------s.sia.ntiaX Present Use of Property _______Other (specify) ______________ ----------------------------------- Estlilted Construction Cost DESCBIPTIOH op heqoest Descr: V2BIAHCES required V Lot Area Setbac-k Variances ( Other v3A-<. nVu Lot Width Front ____ Hardcover Side - . •>». V /**'&?)■e-Hm-:: •; ^ yV^. V ,■k>L :■* ' • %■;: M wS¥MM '■■-t\S ••■.. ^.: ./•••* >• mmmm I'k\-:k-S/kP;V,HARDSHIP Oesc info■mm &A' -- .-4-RBQUZRBD >. CompV- i.h ?V" /k'J /M Cert.this 348- Stam name obta: Certi Topoc in e: Plat As ax %.■any c Addit W-' The Appli remember informatic ^n Certificat Zoning Off ;AA 4 ■y? The appli requested unusual ex the infon knowledge. Applicant' • fc ONHERS SIGi The owner authorizes agents# Coi tion and v< Owner's Sic Ui; •; .t -v.. ■•• • ;■ Applicant I Pl^mning C< third Mond review meet uxiable to • authorized Office of t ‘y- •■ •■'^•h.'.': j- ■■ : ^.v 'i " '.I w ^ . ».;:--;’ v'V ■.'■ .• :•*■■ -■ ■ -.. ■-■ ": -■ : -■ ■ifr 't^iy..;,'v;^vV'^!MSKr:/ 'j-v-xf’ :.'■mmm^M ^mmmmmm.».-•-;* ....mmI';‘'ifv3','.vm'\0mA ' /, 4«.'■r«.lulting from strici: c i ^tx^ CiXkculty r«sulti;ig from st^ici: ^Vf v><«. \c \-.W VtA:0 iiii»P:a •!•]. It% m',:v.v^vS ting compliance with Zoning i V/<A ; r / '.ttv h4f>«>•■•.■• «. •. ■ ‘'/litfm'-i, Ithin 150* (you must obtain Financa A-603 Govt Cantar . r>r *. w - i ' •U ! ^ mmm ■t.0m... .- ■' • r,*V- *• .. *♦•■*» ■-'* “'-wA 'fc- auampea# xe^o.x vuwj.ut'ca \w-.v, pra-addrassad to aach of tha names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). Cej-tificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this appl'.cation. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_______________________________ Date_______________ £^. J.1%»T'S SIGSAiaRS The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge.A Applicant's Signature \AA->-tf9 Date CH9KEBS SIGMAIOHK , , The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application ana further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga— it^n of this rosiest. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plauming Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held m the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building a Zon Office of this change prior to the meeting. PS ilc .y, ■ iiiii / :.m , y.K-' : -v; >. ilfl • V > • • • , r . r . . V • •.. h Pv:r y 58 10-OOOS8 NEO INC NED INC 1212 E NAYZAT4 58 10- 00038CRt«R NANi ARLENE 1 TAXPAYER ARLENE 1 NAME/AOOR 1295 ARI CRYSTAL 38 10-1 PROP ADOR 02170OltCR NWK BOBBY D TAXPAYER BOBBY 0 NAME/AOOR BOX 12S CRYSTAL PROP ADOR ONNER NANS TAXPAYER NAME/AOOII ...••»• -= P-, ■ ■ 58 10-1 01295 , ARLENE L ARLENE L 1295 ARM NAY2ATA PROP AODR OHITCR NAME taxpayer NAte/AOOR 58 10 013 T5 KURTIS KURTIS 1380 Al HAYZATi PROP ADOR CR04ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 38 10-11 01335 M BARBARA J BARBARA J 1535 ARBOr HAYZATA t Wy 5|iai ^1' ^:yy r:. ~ ’iM; P " ■ yt!nm£ mmmMKm-t.'f;.:..^At-.*-7r!r.irfREPORT NO. P]43l4dl PA6C 10-117-23 31 0014 CRYSTAL AVE MWIST ETAL IGOUISTBAY m117-23 31 0017 PROSPECT AVE A 0 ORUmOND A 0 ORUMtONO aspect AVE BAY m BS32SllT-23 31 0028 ARBOR ST « BENSON BT AL I BENSON AND tANIELS-BENSON WR ST HN 5S391 17-23 31 0044 BRIAR ST R J JENTILUCCI ETAL R A OlANE JENTILUCCI AN ST BAY NN 55323 17-23 31 0050 BRONN RO S tON A ASSOC INC ILEY *4 ROAD SO *1 55391 T-23 31 0053 IRIAR ST ETAL ELT AY m 55323 ' .'{'I-jit. .:■-■■■■ ■m-'.m,' :* ' ‘v"... ^ ;.:t•v't' .’ • -: .•'Hi :., ;■ ■r wmm mm ,. *.it:mmmm,mmM m ■■■^mw -mmmm •-T rPm>.' < - ■; : ■ i -.'•A>.jamPV';=:! mI ; f"- \. ■ ^ . .MEMCPiW COUNTY PROPERTY IWORMATIOH SVSTEH RNOPERTV atCRS LIST report MO. P1415401 PA8E 1150 10-117-23 31 005401345 ARBOR STj E SUTNERLAND A J OUaONJ E SUTNERLANB4B45 MAIM ST EHAPU PLAIN tOI 55559 $8 10-117-25 51 005501585 ATOOR ST ENRIOUE A LIBATIQUE ETAL ENRIGUE LIBATIOUE 1585 ARBOR ST MAYZATA tt< 55591 58 10-117-25 31 005402140 NORTH SHORE CR OORIS I EISEMIRAKR DORIS I EISEIAtRAMEH 2140 NORTH SHORE OR MAYZATA MM 5559138 10-117-25 31 005701335 BRIAR ST HERBERT A SHEPHERD ETAL HEWERT A SHEPISRD 1555 BRIAR ST NAYZATA MN 55391 58 10-117-25 51 005»02195 PROSPECT AVE BPa.JI L OAMMON PAUL LINOBERG 2195 PROSPECT AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 58 10-117-25 51 005901555 BRIAR ST HTRA CT* OP ARTS 8 EDUCATION HTAA Clf to ARTS A EDUCATION p 0 BOX ti'*CRYSTAL BA' mN 5532358 10-117-25 51 004000038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO HTKA CTR or ARTS 8 EDUCATION HTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EDUCATION O BOX 158CRYSTAL BAY tO» 55523 38 10-117-23 31 004100058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO MTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EDUCATION! HTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EDUCATION P 0 BOX 158 CRYSTAL BAY »l 55525 58 10-117-25 II 004200058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO HTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EOUCATIONI HTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EDUCATION P 0 BOX 158 CRYSTAL BAY ttl 55325 V t 38 10-117-25 51 0043 02180 NORTH SHORE DR HTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EDUCATION HTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EDUCATION 0 BOX 158 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55325 58 10-117-23 32 0001 02240 NORTH SHORE OR HTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EOUCATiaT MTKA CTR OF ARTS 8 EDUCATION P O BOX 158 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 TOTAL BATCH 004 00024 T reoTTFV THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION « IT AP^S THl^ATE ON TH^EC^^ OF THE HENNEPIN CCM4TY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAMTION, TO THE BEST OF MY ICNOHIEOGE AND BELIEF.| DATE Imy fr-AA AA A : V A:r.rA.'y,-» A -r ■ v't '- ^ ■!: , Vmmm !»Ur-M mA-AmAAA :fe:T-14;Aj'f m A Wty-4 iD A- A '• ■' » AimA'At WmApM A m:Ar- -r-^: wmm-A- ■::. MM ■A.AA-A-AA P: y r- : * mmm ■■Kp^r:m wmA. . . ; I mm mmmmpm Bkj -A-'-AiApl A - t'-:¥¥o:¥-7Si7-;4:;77u • ,-v ' A-^r-Ai PPPPm^WA P:^§MiPMpAAA ■ V .V •••■■^- ;• • ■ 1/ •• ‘>1:^ : .*;• t . V r • • ! • ‘ 4 ' * v.= 'IK J C7» e c V)*o — 4J 1-d)H in <D ^ E 4-> XI ■M 1} >< 4->0) U) 4-> cu o in V)#o <0 XI —.' 4->—. C L. Oi «T3 »T3 <D t- >»^ fT3 4- ^•1.—. o O o> o c 4-> XI 00 CVJ E 2 i. C to 1 o OI o r>H II C XIu — o •—O in 4-> 4->1 «i. ra —I tn XD U cn o» O 1-• • • •.. c_ 5' MAX.C fcf^ ^ MM r 16' 0* MtN. (TYP)5’M/X raoLiiZi A i C POOL AREA POOL CAPAcrrv AT MAX. DEPTH 12* ■ 24'12'24 ’3-T'288 Sq Ft 8.900 Gallons 14* * 26*14'26’3'-6"364 Sq, Ft.9.600 Gallons 18' » 33'16'32’3'-6"512 Sq. FI 13,600 Gallons 18' » 36'W 36*3’ 6”648 Sq Ft 17.600 Gallons 20' « 40'2(r 40'3'6"800 Sq. FI.22.300 Gallons NOTE VERTICAL DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN FROM LINER BEAD TRACK.ncf^iaiigiilar Non • Hopper Pool DinMTiutions 'r"- ..’v- . •tf liliWi •-;.. . • -. = •:• : ■.. . • . ■• .- ■ ■■■:■ - vV=-:, =:,r- m ■ V • • ••■: *."v '•■- ■ ■ ■' '. .. f ■'; ■ '••' .' ■A • ;■« • : ■ • 'tV" ,u:£3^i &1H »• Ites. ^ I .V-.mm/■••v •••'■ •• •• '■''tAlSTlMt, pCiOMtJ^Tl O !SI 4 . u'liu" poyTi oM # r 1 ‘t'«tw‘ <-OM<.- flC».i •< OM ao' ^l^' AlO" f»t<i- la'nu' f>e&T b»J ll''« IW»‘ tout ftCK. OH 31N31 ‘ » »Z^ FT<;. T-SVA” i!ii; » I ^ *• tll-U -f, 1^. - :9-: ••;• ^mmsm Mmx "J, iUMi ;V - ; . . •• •> - . V:!' .• • **..■• • •■• ■ ^ •• ^^.■mmm.Z,.r -I v.-*; > -. . -. ••• -i ■ ^^ : •- ■ ;:■:.V :;,;v ;j; ^^■, V;; mmm ::m^m''..■^;r;£-:.y;"'; -: mmsmmi^m ■■■':■:■. :• ••• ,-■mmm ff ■i'/V ;-ry..- ':'J. tV'W" ^ >7■ ‘'.•i.'i. Xmffvi-'V'mm• »!• */4Uki‘ ^V.tV ’mf il;; # :«A I: ;¥SS • ''V*-v' :*'»*• v\^'*-■ >V'.r. f > *v y.. -,„ •*'■ ■ ■ t- ' »r -i- ■—"■ " *' '."‘^'■■r^1.*^.^-^ ^‘.^i iteliVh-"•■i I ‘ ■. ■ -• •■i“:.’^i f ..>’ ^ JVyiA'v...*■.<;ytr- .;;;• •! .:/. >;.b^.c^>V-vT'K.v,'•’■>.. . 'y‘ *» . Ji ‘*C' .-r .f ii'.'V? . ■ . •^ >;^-y JA--' •■ *;. •r/y' V.V ’.*'* /» > * ‘#‘ , ^*.v/ ^ r.,4*r-- Vi /l'.' ;■V '‘V •. . A . *. ■ . ' . * . i'L slwlIbi'k n ' ,ll.^ l:^• . ■•' « ,'.ay*. [i Jr-t-toi ^ • %. •. * I ■ -,'V,.l ^ v'^-vv: ■ Pft , '.■ ;'■ > : y V ••'■'• ■ y'.y '■■ ;yVv;vvv:y;vyv%^-;^-VV ov.,v:v,V'-vyv ■7;- ■ % V ••;• »V • .'••••^ ' • ■ .• y::.:#...W.ViiV.- .5.-: v’t . :.-. . .: •• it' ■'• ■ vvv-yi:ytvy'%f.:r;:-^ ]gy^gyr-:y^ri,:-:y f ■ . •■• V >■ .?. • •■: ■. -.• : .:■■' V.' •■•.V.- f^y;:V iMi \ \ ■ v • • * " * »v * •' •' -■ -v'^ £:::f •• - :m- ^S'U:.>:. :. ^ ;-r- ;-'Tii^-'-:^ :■-: ■>•<•■:. r-^^v-:;vr i ^/. •:>^ :^'pilWiHliiIKIi-Kli i.^S3Ei 1:i'-V ;-'*.: i. .'/>■ f 'j'-*-}/^ ■■' • !• ;//•:, 1 7'-1/, v.;:'. ^ I'. :> • *fi> r* ^ »* ' I ♦ '•..' ' *•*. • ('•. ' / ••' V •• ♦ ,■ %/♦•». t. , : •■'■.■. •?* / Wif • I V • f»^ • » ♦ ♦#• . »• • •' •■ * •'* *■ fT*-/ N» ! P"-te ' 1 .4: r • f. n.fX ! '-. V • : " ■ •.■•••♦ •■•.*. • ^ • •• '.’■. ■..*.• •■• . . .. : .*• ; :• ,i . •.:. ::X.x l^BSaiiiiaiiL v?^.i.-i'v-'/. r-':'- ■■■^ • ?St. • if J;.'•;■■•■»t ••••t : •»■»•■ k f* yjr *'^jgiy AantT Bft’' 'KPi'.[§gwi>/«r r?ME >"'•1 ;, ■A « J » Fm ;,»"^^MMlTTMliilirT ~ nnm i i** • > r ;IW jilkrm Vv- .Bv-vB ;bbbv:?^/ - ='l'.: r'. •', :. ’••• V.--1 ■•;■; •.' 'y-.J,^\ ^ ' •/ .: -V.- • . ' • . ■ : i -i 'xia ht4 ■- " • ' . » 4 r. . . , * -r ' . • <• •••■^•••^ ^»^‘-. 4 «■■- _ -------- -------*— , ’^—■■■1 I — 5^^-- —^4 4^^*^****^**-^«------- "~J2■' *'•■ - - -*» — ■•••• ■ v^©#i -f S- • PS • «I«.V'rr*. .0:;-'mmmm■ ■m mMiliVt .-.. S-:^'vyTO:Planning Cooaission Chairman Kell«y Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson raoi: OATI: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building I Zoning Administrator August 30# 1989 SUBJECT: 11446 Mr. and Mrs. Jack Yost, 151S Green Trias Road Conditional Use PermitAariance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances “ Section 10.22 Subd. 1 and 2. Section 10.55 Subd. 8 Application involves replacement of retaining walls and land alterations within 75 feet of the lake. Section 10.03 Subd. 19. The application also involves land alterations in excess of IQQ cubic yards outside of the 75 foot setback area. Review of hardcover 0-75 feet Allowed Existing Proposed 75-250 setback area Allowed Existing Proposed • 0 800* sq ft or 2.4% 1,361 sq ft or 4% X s 13,342.5 sq ft or 25% 11,513 sq ft or 21.6% 13,104 sq ft or 24.6% * Please review Exhibits E, P and G. The building permit for the lakeside addition noted Oii survey. Exhibit P is certified by surveyor at 76 ft. In review of Exhibit G a survey done by the same survey firm but another surveyor confirms that there was only 75 ft from the corner of the existing house, placing the new addition 65 ft from the lake. Note applicants consultant has used the correct base survey for enclosed exhibits. The 75 ft setback mark as shown on all plans is based on the 929.4 elevation. It is not known the exact date the retaining walls were constructed in the lakeshore yard. Some of the wall sections may have existed when the former residence was constructed. Newer sections were constructed without the benefit of a land use or building permit review. List of Exhibits: Application Property owners list Plat map Engineer's review Building permit #4181 Survey sumbitted with permit dated 3/14/80 McCombs Knutson Exhibit G - Survey dated 3/11/80 - McCombs Knutson Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit C D E F 1 h /■ . vS; ■: .V : .^-V =■■K^m:^ - 7 '•>/;m'-m-mF-ia &.k£i ■■-;f,,: Istrator 1 Trees Road - earing alls and land ,0.03 Subd. 19. excess o£ 100 t or 2.4% ft or 4% sq ft or 25% [ ft or 21.6% [ ft or 24.6% jermit for the certified by (y done by the hat there was .acing the new jnsultant has s. The 75 ft on the 929.4 taining walls of the wall asidence was at the benefit lated 3/14/80 s Knutson I 0 Rx''*'" fel^;‘fjtUy ..-.n ‘Vr,’.-! ...........ir KX .i ■: mmi--y.n '( ■'-C P ••.--*r>.' -. V • •:"? ■ m tTv ■r.'i ;:!V . . f-.t. •: ^yfyyyy- :-■ • S-. ..'.^ •:• Kf/ ir y.\ ■..■■■ . :» Jr: -V* -'■■Lr-.~. . vM fr:, »a> «* « ■ ^ y f . 'AjliW^ii «f-. mm ,• i S-- . Y 'f i. my-- s mrf xm-y i'.' ■* ' .*. . ■ ; .• .. , "Aki -“i i ■■■::. Exhibit H-1 Exhibit H-2Exhibit B-3Exhibit I - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M Exhibit 0 - Section > washout area- Section detail - repairs adjacent tofoundation wall- Section detail - on planter box, retainingwall cap and sitting fence cap Hardcover fact sheets Location sapMap of useable areas in relation to slope areas Proposed land alterations and location of retaining walls (existing and proposed) Drainage plan Slope profiles lakeward Brief Review of application The applicant proposes the conplete removal of existing retaining that are in a state of deterioration as a result of faulty design and installation. Deterioration of the walls has been hastened along by serious drainage problems and the back to back 100 year storms of 2 years ago that created the major washout. The lakeshore yard is currently in an unusable and unsafe condition. The new retaining wall systems will actually reduce the tiers of retaining walls within the lakeshore yard. The height of the wall is proposed at 2 feet to 8 feet exposed vertical height. Where the grade at the outside of the wall exceeds 30 inches in height rather than installing a railing per the building code, applicant proposes planter boxes. Positive drainage will be provided with drainage outlets at each side of the lakeshore yard. Note that the retaining wall tiers will be installed with grass. Surface runoff will run over grassed areas to the weep holes at east side and through a filter/trench system at the opposite end draining into a grassed retention area and finally to an existing urainage pipe at the north side of the lakeside yard. The applicant's landscape architect has laid out a system of lath and string line designating the location and height of the proposed wall for members of Council and Planning Commission who visit the site. A visit to this site is most important in order to not only understand the many exhibits submitted for this review but the full intent and purpose of this comprehensive repair project. The City Engineer has completed the majority of this review. Please review his comments and recoxunendation in Exhibit D. Additional Staff Comments Staff would recommend that the 240 square feet of the house addition that was approved with permit #4181 with an survey now be credited against the hardcover within the 75-250 foot setback area, resulting now in a slight excess of hardcover at a total of 13,344 sq ft (existing 13,134 + 240) or 25%. Applicant must be advised that any ocher improvements that require additional hardcover will require approval of the City. Upon staff's inspection of the site with xmmm ieimygmmsmmmx E'^--yy y-'y.r ■■■ ■■■. ■x\ ■ : r '■. :i- :x:y ;V' •• - V ■ ; - .mmmi .Mr h Xyr rm yyXryyyM' • -V • :r ;v.-i:pi^-'.V^' :• . ■;::^ ', :■>•A.'s* •.:_ .'■■ ' ••> »»t tor retaining :o slope ition of >posed) j retaining of faulty s has been tck to back »r washout, ind unsafe lly reduce yard. The (>t exposed f the wall railing per Positive ich side of rs will be assed areas ench system >n area and ide of the ts laid out cation and id Planning te is most y exhibits ose of this lis review. )it D. ' the house 1 incorrect the 75-250 f hardcover 10) or 25%. iments that e variance e site with la-v; : Rv::, /t ’ V- ' ‘ b^.y4?T/CVvFv “*nng. ,ni not that;ar/ ill be exposed to the Opticas of AfeiA.Optioas of Actloa ^ IjSf (3di * ^DDrmpsi _ wns'idltVd,' ” ‘PP'o-red th. tono.tng cond.tl*y conditions must be------ %a 9 '■ «P°« th, rouowin, .at t. *• l«,tai„l„„______ . ® “I'-ir.d: l«d®soapi^V".lrr«Uh- '>• bdilt 'p'r'""*'*' «t/rrcJ VaVj’ai”"' "oaVon'^o^-.^oanks along the lake. <5amage to the shoulVliVof a**"*K**^ against the outat<i should be uled nature and stJbn*< wall Silt fenie backfill ?o Slope is steV/rnhan"/A.^"® " uV/°Ve«* Shall « a7Wi"V,^“p^.Vd! •‘•'“‘Oh ”bs----- ' «*posed. E. Dnrm a.»_ 1 j . . ------system. on planters and th^waliwail tie back system. ' •■ ■!.■ ’•■ ' ' •*■■ ' ■■* . • •• ,|.; yr.^r .V •. .. ; * * ” y:-iy:y '’-yyy ^V. • •!'■•"*•. •-•... .• ■ .. >•• ■-■■ mmm '. v:y '■- ■•■,’. . ■■•" •■ ;-• •■ : •1=.v;-r -rv >..•'■•>•• ’ymm-,. 1 »iK mmmmrn: ;:f !5 -VS:'^;.:;Vv^,!;S/^:'v'1^X.v^->:: ions MW ^.•-Xe^'' .i.^ 1< ^*WP'.1 ’'ilings will notV® ®teep bank a the grade on existing heavy 11 provide the exposed to the fer to Section necessary *^ior to any wall can act ">age to the of the wall nation fabric ent errosion. filled areas ^'^ation nor rrange for a >te schedule nstaliation It for the lust submit ick system. CITT OF OROIKJ - GZaESAL LAHD 0S3FSOFSaTT LOCATICW Site Address tntsps T^D , fX^V.Property Identification Susher (P.I.D.) [j- H—^~Sr ■ . * e • r "w• .4 ! ^ ’•. m ■ •• ••^'4. « ■ •““•rforc?nit\yJi%^^”4pii4i=«torrens?'_-v •• #’:% ••vefc.fc.“kvVPlease attaci legal description to application if not includedon required survey. LcT _______________* Phone (hamm)APPLZaUR N.» 4 Mps -Utic ^CST MS'S Address ttpp^S 'R tA^ I (if different than applicant) Name f m ------------------------------- Address ------------------------------------------- Phone (work) City nrt^AJQ-------- Zip e:.".dj.c;nr land. (month/year) I (■■S (CLO nC3^ ; axaw wwaa j- - - 4. ^x:r-,:j,:..X;:xy: :„v-■L: ;-":-v h - K' -\ ' X *■' X-; ^ fees - COBDITIOBAL DSZ PBRHITS - S?«ii‘.I“.«"«X“5SSirJurr.nt Application r.. $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use Institutional (church# school# etc.) Duplex Credit/Bldg Comnercial/lndustrial Use Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or fillin, - m «• ??• « “5*S3“|/;««irrr.taiain, «U. within 7S- of lakeshore see fee schedule Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning Appeals see fee schedule mm '■ * ^ •■ *•% ?■♦■ ■ - ■ ■■ ■ 'V ' • ■: ■ ■ ■•■ I'V/i.. ■ . . ••% : .'' ■ -! r.'fsi.F i' • '• .5, IM'-*X- ■ • •4:V.f;' .r >• 1. •• i-i-.'V.-'v'V;,v.’• .'/v : V- rtiSd •«. . ;# • •■*xa®' x;-i ••■ V •' . ■; ***^ :: .- ••■•^ . ■ . :■ ■ ■- =• ■ ::. -V V r- . . ;.V. .-C oS5E v'-".. . A V;-: , • . . ■•,- f.-, ; •• . ^ !-.r •-/:':. ■':.’■':\-:l '\i--^:^ .^}-':v idT'" ■’WESzar USE of psopsbttPrssent Zoning District 6tCw\-g g .Present Use of Property CAi^tLv4 Residential___________ Other (specify)D2SC&1PTZ0H OF MDQOBSTDescribe request in detail: gg.OKv^'t. gjfcSTcflAnOkD CP_DAp.«n^ifc f^SLAt-Ti FfZTNr^ rLC>De^-r>gA.wafc.t^ A,..xr-i\jkMv OvXiS. tfTpfZ-f*^ LO nJOj-tn-no^ ~ S^XSB) SOBMXnmLS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certificate of survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). Plat Map. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember t.hat your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature ________________________________ Oats APPLZCAMT'S S16HATDU The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true ard correct to the best of his/her knowledge. i^maas szghatoib Applicant's signature Data V The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorised reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Otmer's signature Date ^/yy Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Connoission and Council. If an applicant is to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building t Zoning Offxce of this change prior to the meeting. ■ - A'.. rV. ’;'4| •ir/v'-' . a ■ .--K' •/■• ■•.vjo- -.;■■ ■ . rv'K-‘V^r-::;V/.V,;.:v.:^•::^i^^?:^/V. c-■•■.\..;i. J..; •.., :• :;.,.,^^.r-ryyy::.I %m<MMmm■ :■. V-. tumimSi"KilH*.’':;■' "5IS ;t ^111*' m :Hidm V:- A -IT- .. . ty.->^.:y--\••f \ ■:,■•♦'/ ■./ ^% y ■ •■=•”-■ .. ':■: ••■ •:■■ ■ .■■ -y-' ^a-^yy- '■■■■'■ ■■■' y- ■ -J-: -tyyymsmy '■X'* . ■':••' ■ ■*'■ ■[ '■ •■■yyk y■‘ .^; •-^'iM-iy’im yp^yy: ';i-^napif '-‘IL • • .T- • .. y :yyy = - •.:»•'■ ■ ■•: • •■■ii V'- gWSi«SiK pSlIiAg;:;*: , . V-..:. ■.: •■ ,,v mm flA:- V~.. • s \ r^TtWh] m/y - : lii lyWmmfy ■,■••. •• f I Pmmyym • j . f •** gs* . - • ^ j m wm $mm » :'.r;-^ mPM^ rnmm f"<i-is.mU">y-L ■rtEV;ymy4my'.'. "1 f ... rl; ;:■ *.•. . f :IU y- it y y 'm m -A # f ('I • NOUffO raso L. i--.. yg ^: r -V If. ' **■■■.r;;fmr-M : "-Ws.\. A* -‘•’V ¥'■. • :• REPORT NO. P14SS401 PAGE 7 117-E5 14 0010 MIUSTON RO P BURMELL P BURNELL lRXES AVE S suite SOI ( SS431 117-23 23 0013 GREEN TREES RO rOST A ORINA YOST YOST EEN TREES RO LM B&391 117-23 23 0018 ADDRESS UNASSIGECD RS LIFE DEVEL CO ;RS life DEVEL CO LAKE ST i 55414 ^ifxasJb I s'. >.' lu. >—J URATE AND TRUE S DATE ON THE RECORDS AKATION. TO iHE BEST P\ru ^L. m •*»* ■r../ Kiifti'.■'■S’i,t t'• • .i5t. ■ ’tr^y. W- % I K 1^,1 iias"- -?SiliKSBf.3i3a ■lM mymmm . ■4 P, i>#liRWRM•f m w^m «*» V/?,r • < '.V ;;r» .•%v. ■ ...!•• I,:..-mimm}''■■■. '■■■■■■■:-rf:-?; ■=: :y:■ .: V,: " ■• ^ :. •'m<-mm T*.V 4- ^ . ’•-“3)■ - .H:-:••>••.. ./v!; ■m if «> ?;v. •;•■ jys. f ly :-. :<• i-: % : ■%:WXy , ;•<’■ ■ ■ .' ’.■. '.’ . i^v. .-r. ^ •« KK ;:\r .• . *« iN«f..ai» JC>-//7- a3 L 0/ '//7-■V * S, C/.V5 3 * *«\ [\H t c > 4 •ttOUMO 1950 5 J \ *I 'f# V le Pan{fl v« V [3 ^t. 1 90 :t!to w '«• I CO (R4 yi ^ » \s AkJ.4 (‘i;»/i I r/ '■/: •4i4^ I •4! ^i:■• /■V" *» '•X I f. • / / ’ }R|EN trees RL, ... 5, /^r c • — — — * ^ ^ ^ ✓ - -w.ir ) I ij ■■ ^ —^? u| 'J- * BAY IMNETONtYA «? SMIT lake, (ujfix/oi.nm 1345*' / ••rrtr C«mty 5^ •-/i i» RAcr §•»• •• ,. ^ 'JH I ^ • - CJ wNff H’...«|,VAr OCr. S0UnC£3, .•'* sr* «. ‘ . . %»-‘ •jf-- .. . yyy^ r.:’-y'- ••:i •V • -f' ■-T m^wmm , • . ■; ' :: .: 4, V-.;. :■■ V-!.’, my m i-yyj 1 ■: _ ’ '1 i tV 'W- ’ J' r^.4 :v-3t ,*• J ■,|J'£ - ^ V ,. yy:y } i y*y-r'^ m y^-' • > mi » -I USik■■■ ■:■. '■ ■■■■■:■■wI'A.; ■'V .;■ ••.=•;:••■ : -14 4m •«;a#;s “sm ' ■7,,- .;: rp '%77777] '7 ■:■ 7, . V7 Engfnevs M Archiwcts At^(utt IC* 19t9 City of Orono l<ut ’§i CrjitAl Iftcy* *® 33329 Attai Jeaon* (Ubusth t«i 139-1446 J*ck Yo#t Property Stora Deaege tcpeir Dear Jeanne> «• hare reeiened the lake there restoration eork proposed OO th« Jack Yost proparty at 1315 Green Treea toad along Tanager Laka. The retaining wall should be buiirprinr to any landscaping work within the wall so that tha wall can act at a protective zone fro* erosion or daaege to th« exterior banks along the lake. of fill areas whera the alope is steeper than 4 to 1. The elevation of the new wall shall not be allowed to exceed the 956.0 •Novation sn«* no more than 6 vertical feet of wall ahall be exposed. Planters propoaed to be built adjacent to the wall in areas in aieas where the «all height exceeds 30* should be sufficient for pedestrian restraint to prevent e fall and so handrail should not be required. However, e eore detailed plan layout of tha plantars ihoald be subnitted for review. The etom water drainage control plan incorporatet a trench dra^ intercepts storm water from the roof leaders and directs it to an existtog storm holding and drainage area. The drainage of surface water from behind the retaining wall will reduce the pressure loading against the the proposed retaining wail. Page 1 2335 \»bst Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 '4 - Mm Kill ^ ymii - ^ 7:.t ^^4 r-^ V •••••: ^ :'^vk7; 7-;-:■'•■ '.i‘ V'b '7-777M:t'jV:•M’v'-V:. sj- m-i W 7}M0 7'A&i '77:m7 • t: :: ■:■■. ■ ■■ '■• . ■ ■••• / ■“ ■ ••.- ■ •• •-•; y .'.UW:W:^mMi^:iM«n*« C 4>rtC»' ^irffnei 9 MMnd PI K^f>ne<f< P P<nttfyo0^ Pi K^jr> A 9jcnmar<r Pj Pt^ J CiPMtP Pi Marti O VIM. Pi Thomas ff Ahdemih. AiA Gary f Pyiaraet Pi ono«a:HBbMaid A samoid F£ Suvm M r PAmnPBPi } . ly Ho^airt A itntoai Pi PS 11. Dana! ion PE Mark A flufik I 191 roposed on the Jack Yost te. adscaping vork within the froa erosion or danage to 1 should be^ soil of be incorporated within the so be required at the biie 1. I to exceed the 956.0 shall be exposed. in areas in aieas where the ledestrian restraint to .red. However* a more imitted for review. I a trench drain system that lirects it to an existing surface water from behind ig against the the proposed ^:n •iL J '•M •’■*. ’ * •vj't m wmmm. v.;:v-'o mh miM rnmMm #:.si pj. . . If V. ■^■;:f u'' ■ • ' i H ' :.-:■ . ;Y"■ ":m ■ •' ■• 1. • j J*^V " • • :z immmrnym 'mii..f iiii ■' ■' -^y:; ■'.. ' ■: ■:%.r. ...Tr^ij1W-&-•' ::y:yym m :■ -V ■-.• • I’ i! 'h !■ r''-H ■ t" ■•■ ■•"' ■II y)r 'Hli*'■? ■:i'_mV‘6:^.^ Th* loc.tioa .n4 Iwight of tlio propotod <«ll h*a boon laid out by tbo lutd.capor up<H^ tt>. proparty with lath and atrinflin. for awabara of tlW itaff or Planaiat Coamlifion Intaraatad in rawiawing tha propoaad laprovaaonta dt tba alto. tfa rtcoattand that ataff coaatruction inapactlon bo lacatporatad Into tha ccmatructlon of tha rataining wall to inaura that tha aorroansilng lakaahora araa ia not J.c^rdiaad by tha ccmatructicux. Va would racoaaand that tha City approwt a concapt plan for tha raatoration work and r.Qulra datailad plan of tha wall tia back ayatoa and tha adjacant plant.ra. If you hare any gnaationa, pl.aaa contact thia offica. Youri wary truly, tOHESTROO. ROSElit, AHDEILIK ( kSSOCUTES, IMC. pypL/<^Jr^ Michaal C. Lynch MCLidf Paga 2 OROXOlilding PermitAWUiCATiO-N FOR Cf RTiFrCATf OF CCCUFANC^30X 66. crys tal lAY, MN 5S323 47X7»^^ 4/ S'A FfRMiT N? 4181DATE {SSUE0.2L1Z|L z£P D^RCS•)MNG DISTRICT•*C TOM! ■/** OATS £LStTC ADDRESS -----------------------------------------------------------tfOAi> otscwiRTio»i MioF to 7 ^ ••" «aJ ^/I—ARCMiTfCT4ER6'R«R - *Km (Ryiii^Fiwiir. CmrnmmuCERT WO■*OM> USE DATE {fifmtLOT AftfA «nOTM OERTM SUILOSN (Fir*J lASi^t »ROFOSEO SETtACKS f^ROWT RSlDC TVRf OF«*ORK •»E*R LSlOf LAKEI I ____ { ACCESS MW WfTLAWS •too SiZt i NKW CXISTIMG { aGEMCV AFRROV. DATE I CITY county ■5TATI rn. EASEMENT OMLt {jmr% GAfI stalls A€StO. CLASS STOAltS STOfStfS •CD sirnc APA OATf DOCK pm^osfoutt COUNCIL A^ OATS CST CONST valuation KMilT nis •coo. FERMT .a A art STATE FEE ^ FLAN REVIEW 60 FEMALTY FARK FEE ______________ SAC CMARCE TOTAL OUf nCMAKiCS: »^fSPCCTION REQUIRED /^OOTINUMvoff SHAMING Fvwfli in INSULATION NALLSOANO SolMt T9Mf FINAL bMoN ’tVOHlC SerONO ON NTTNOUt A Nf OUiNfO INSNfCTlON WLL if SUS- ,'PCTTOMNALTY iNWtCTION nouns 473.T»7 CALL S • 12 A.M. INSN 1 • 4 F.M CALL 1 > 4 PM. INSN. NtXT OAV WORK REQUIRING SEPARATE PERMITS NLUMtING mechanical WELL ______ SEETIC -------------------- SENIEN____________ NATEN ____________ cnaoinc • filling ELECTNICAL Nom SMfi ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE UNOenSGNiD HfNflV NiOUfSn FtOMtltlONTO wam TMC NiAL IMENOVEMtNTl SEta^lfO. AND OiCLANft UNOfO AENALTY OA lam ACNNOWLEOOtMiNT AND ACWT- ANCl OA all INfONMATION, CONDITIONS AND NfOUMt* NfNTS NiANtSlNTEO ON TW« DOCUMENT. TNf UNQtR-- SiGNf0 AUNTMf N AQNEfS TO DO ALL MONItS IN STRICT CM* ALIANCf MfTN ALL CITY OA ORONO OROlNANCfS AND STATE OA MINNESOTA SyiLDlNO CODE REOUIREMENTS. IMHITE-AILS cananv-insaecton AtNK-ASSCSSON ONE EN> finance QOLO->NCCSlAT .OntMi A _ . *5 ■’^7...it lx ■lVL?4 f #U;!I ■* ■ ^ • ■'■h ••cv is* ;■:■"■• ' ' f! ,Hr^ •V- ;F t«8 V . , ^ Sip-7/jr rW Cewtruetlon n»n (nton^ (PhontI .UATION 0 60* ITKE8 r ^ ^ *y- ^ 60 ^0* DQEMENT !srs KRMiniOM TO NMKI ICtPIIO. AMO OKUMUI rLCOOIMINT AND ACCCTT* MorrioNS AMO Mtoumi> >OCUMtNT. TMI UNOCn- >LL ttlOflKS IN ITtllCT COM* ) ONOMANCn AMO CTATI QUmtMINT*. w ^ t V«<* '0 .tr'-..' ■ . ■. r m r '• • ;*?>■• -^',..1.. -!V'- I V Dote* 3 . K - S-o m ^'f'EDO i ■#-■'w J.940T^puctjgo^laa ■ ;v ’irp- • -‘Ifc .: ••■■',5:-: k.:::vS ;i‘■■••'•■ ■’•;■•■ .:- , ■ ’’■ ' '■■■-■.,ii. ■■', ■: ■■'■'■.■ ■■ .'.■. .•■.!* • -i»-.p-BE:/'-:'' -^'' , ■®£i^ - /I 5/ 3f iV <S> AsCjREbl KIEjT '/ W,' 17 ?ff I ’6c'- ’f6-9 •• 305 9»- 4k. .V'- :>w GEUE5.' TOTA sL- or TOTA k L- mo M»M \MUM CE-XCI-00\K ■ :. -&f, 4.) /WIE-R.A&E- :v .; ^ .-' M s') UOT D»Mt V_____« » « \___\ ”T* N/ w, ''TitAv r' • :l^ '.■■-i-jta:a:psWi*■■••’ ••'••.;i''' "Mi-•:ppifeay^-; ,.^;r. wrnim; ¥M-■ :*.:. ■ VtttiiMy : ■; »»?■iKSiWW.’HKW.Wil'at - "H I*-<»1. ^ •■ « • M.. • (T* ■ VU ---%i ■ ■■»»' %m ®••^- 4 - ■ *I 0 ^ tk 1 1 - iv m t ■ - *Mi. ii>.t . . .. ( . 1k ...Jl ...U i 1 . -1 » “- . ■ • Wt*- ■------- 33J^^ ¥ .-■y ’I v' V .. ^•. .; ■ :.y?:7it- 6 MW ■> tUpitl t?kO!. H6S»T t&oet^ ^€cuoo sTuDn «Ui^'5t\ayLt □!T!SQB1S SP^0!!!3EaQQ5^BEl ^ I •! i 401 t( k -? Ro«i Wwrala. MN 55»1 4n«7lh ' ■ 'I ‘'r imi-mmrn mw::m m y?As,y.: ■ ft.......' Vx ■:iX::Xy :iX ~y si ¥V-y^->:<m' s ii .M ■ f|p mM'-'y.imm Tc r>« > ,:, • -^Oi -• r'r - ••¥■i>m .UA-’ib^I.-. •'J.-.ftT' ir- _CTE liPHHBNM , ,\ : ’; V \<\ /:>‘\r -:y ^ ' -••■■■:-i^v:.: *•«’ =• ^ .:;■'■■■■■ !"/■ ,:•■.■• ^ ' - y''" '■ ;,. ;"C: •■:. :• •.:.. fiiyyfi■>r ,ms hi /.rt: ■ ;• ■•■•I 's iKj»jvi!r\ou — t)»-K*PKMMec Rit> (OMVlAiLQ} • i k tAiu fOLH MEUW^ >NWItCf 0^ Ct^vcjiZtfMbAS I «Q ’A : I »5 ij *1^ J15 load Wayntt. MN SS381 V •‘i'f ri.= ',:i m pmMM ••■ <. ■ '■ ■'■' ~■->• • -Wt; - W ^5' \'^i iii •/^VV.'Svr • :• •i1f •• « i t .I » ' • ' I' • * ^ '..............................\ in«»mK.«eiC <Ar --"T----:• r—K%U«WIW« CAT >•*»i.• H1 T «-. •.•. ,.j .?■%\-m*4l» ▼ tJMC& lAP* jh,.j5#jo„ >|<U foST • t.« Vl f t*i>rti K.4S -W» l\ _-f^^ % crtips ’ ■■■ sTti'Si^’ n#Mt\ou sw> uu * ^.o t. y^\o s«p»«wty miutkidtJb t f^wua C^>»*A), 1^ •'/// W » Hft .O (t<V>*K.-) VaiMUTD rmuffmst 4«VTt»it V.» ^.o — it WJf^iice>T SSP^Q^BiiQSBBES ^ I i01 Totmws W»T«i. ••• »391 473^571 PSilli ;■■ . ... .': • •. • . ■• \.:, ;SWs¥iSs* Iliv ‘ ' V'w-mm:: 7 • y ;77v. m:'m y-Y'^YK-v-yY; ;'*:i .• -y'.7Y77-y.ivY'yy'.•='v'.'■ .y ■ y": ^y'.'Y ■ y : '^ ■ ' ■ -^«,yy y/ '. •■y. y:.y-> .-■=•> ■ ■ '' '^J • •/■"•y -Y-''- ;■>' -a .>!: ■Ar ■ ^ " **■:'•: ■■ y-t:#.'. » ^ ’- ,V.. Y*- •^1 s - y yv.« ■ -y- a ::>'S wm.-/\:v:- ■ V... -;• ,-j.y r--^ " f .::::: •?^y " ;4^: ^Y; = Y S :: y ';• • '^C.y yy.- p:’y^-^yy"v..: :| ly^yyy'y. •:-J 1^4.yy-;;y ••>,•;:: .-y^ .^i ffyy-yyy Ky?yyy:j's A.D. S fMMtP mMrn■;-y mu '- u .. . i -i.1.. ; .p . H _ I t • j • ; 1 T CJMCC. lA^ (Le^wnc) iPlNWtD MllUtUcutt f^UirUKt 'bb'T ■» ^.o 1 ^■i 1^^ ti «v,na.«MSS391 -47»S71 ■-'f.'- ■■:-:5a«;^l!l i m PBSSJ >vl 2-.:f'=v i ■ ■-: • ■.• ■W ,'''■■ •-■■.• V':V P .LA . "4,.■ •'14U4I'*:>,»« '•■■ ■- VSWi,HAR2C:r/£H C.AICULATICS ^CRiCHcz;ScTiACx Z2.1t: (c:sc'-£ cis^ 0-75' it^-250^‘ 250-:uQ' 5CO-ICCO*ExiSTiriG HAa2C2VEJ? Ill Z2NE ____ ■ ...S.F.Apo mateWIDTHa*te> 1. SAilAGS . C. DRIVT:^A? iQ^d iiSl_s.F. 1411 <lt/5> S.A, D. SlDE’^ALXxltLttBfi!!ItfivliMMi E. Patio / D eck SttrfxiMEH SSfS u^Alu V4«. lAlfItMi^Mlfl twte lilfcj __S.F. ifi?*—*^aprns^ MinKS7 fWMT ttMAtOlCp.Landscape_ _ _ _ __ x AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . . . . .. X PLASTIC SHEETING TMi^auI5te <io^1«o «u«. OaiA^UMIUU* miD G. OTHER ____________ X Total Hardcover in Zone - Total Property Area in Zone iim 1^(0+ BUUHvij |Tj_LL&J2—-r fMMP l*>to^ ’ J-J170 ^*MO i.f? 1» ft%V1b X 100 - <-l« (» % ^ _aiUk_/ V'[‘ij'vy;: :>. . > i: ::•• y.-:- ■•'/•.yy.;i. >■•.•:•;'•: ’'V .'i •^:^• .^,j ■ tS;v,:,-tii •■;•:, :k-/: ■ -7^:4■- ■; ;..’V>. •■ ': : • .■.■■' . :■:■■■: ■. ■:. ■ ■■■\: ■ , A ; y-il n-W/; Li • ' ■ :■.'■■■mm vs x-^i i”t 4.. ■■T- Li,^L •• - ■ •»- %>:-v\;' V; # ■i I r ^ p Sis = rh> i?[I' LiL ••••■ y= -■•••:•■■■•- yvs . '-.;y::.' .«»■' ’*snm uA I K'‘ :r-‘ tLi: m- .* ,■> ■<■.. l^y -ii f i'L ... - :' -y" '- ■y: - - '-'■:r >4 tSsT?'' S -X rJ p<^« * «• 0. S ,7 H^:6« P> Oe p.Lan ARE UNO BY PLA SHE. G. OtH PAfjiBteo >=..v:>. A. ^USS a. Harass . c. D rivehay -.MM■ KARUCOVH CAUiJUTlCSTOigHE^ . V«, , *ScTBACX ZONE: (CIRCLE CNf) 250-5C0' 5CQ-1CC0'LISTING Ha RZCCVEH 1J» ZqNE------------— wryfwsuLENGTHWIDTH X X X • . . J.F, _ X - X , X . X 9mn'^4wudiiJiinmlictt01s o»x am nipwni ^S.F. S.X. D. Sidewalk UW4I mr *i \ 7o* V X noX X DECK 4|cr. I^i.t« J.<* F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY •■ . PLASTIC SHEETING X X X X # i.p.•• -• *.p.m o -• 5.F.•iP ■ ____• S.P.•• f • S.P.*m —ZMCL. s.p.ft » 0 s.p.0 --------S.p. 190 • •90- 0 S.P.tit <ep> * - Q S.P.e • o s.p.o O ^ s.p.A s. Other - X Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone s.p. ♦_acD_0 •^^Tgo i.rt- 0 BW*f 0 fed -10 Vttsa .100 •v':.. ■:•. :•■•:'■ ■•■.•■ ■ • ' ••• •■'•L•:■■!•'=■•'*. '■ %A C: mmmWim ^ i~M r I * / i I • I / I ? i 2 p «tp ■jvW? f :--'.g V'fii. ’i '■I \M‘-: V }'■> ^.f m'R r i m $ MMHrWM «M» llJt wmimmiam Ufrmsmn **'9i2 mm «n 'v ^vxam •MU tlMMi*«i NruoNn rw» V-*99 o vy / ^ ^ J» . • « ^ 1 ^ j>» " fiL ^ I *Ls'4dl f^v • ’'.T. ‘-jiJi / / ' >-rv its 'mm-NT- •••1 mt- 5P^5- r li h r-y.hiiy^: m^--m mm 'ia o m ^ ‘4^*- »v*. •• y.:l^ii»'-14^,-.p:'?■••,• ;■Sr 4BSS;, I m L.'<» \: ' I V / / / \ ?S^'* \ \ ‘-A Ml B-' ■■ y-.< >-i- * i m- Ll- • ■'•* I m S:i. - V•*. . V*. V.=v-. >..r---: .-VMlwmmm... ...^ ••*•!;. VvV.-^ia•:..'v5 • •■'•■ . v: .V.Hiil p./ >■. - • Vv^^vv f- !«?-■f S'i. -''. ^*r Vm,- .'■4 -j 4 iH,. r^-' -h r-m • J *•••.:. I «(rf- iV h V1^■4, /-^^': T ■i^h k-1 m^yK'!:"'. ,;a-; ;:.;.;:V' 4 :"- -v.;«■iMiSi TO* Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Maabcrs Planning Conaiasion Chairwan Kallay Orono Planning Coramiaaion Naabara City Adminlatrator Barnhardaon Jeanne A. Mabuath, Building t Zoning Adainiatrator August 29, 1919 Subject* #1447 Lakavlaw Golf of Orono, Ine., 405 North Arm Drive Conditional Uaa Permit Pertinent Ordinancaa - Section 10.03, Subdiviaion 19 - Conditional Use Permit required bacauaa land altarationa involve filling and grading activities in excess of 100 cubic yards of fill. List of Bidiibits - Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Nap Exhibit D - Engineer's Review Exhibit E - Tee & Greens Area Adjacent to County Road 151 Exhibit P - Tee « Greens Area At Intersection of North Arm Drive and County Road 151 Exhibit G - Greens Area Centrally Located Within Golf Course leview of Af^Iication - The City Engineer has completed the review of the Conditional Use Permit as proposed by Mr. Wenkstern. Mr. Lynch reports no adverse effect on the site drainage. Staff recommends approval of the proposed land alterations based on the following conditions: 1. Applicant to obtain land alteration permit from the City prior to commencement of work. 2. Applicant to provide appropriate erosion control upon commencement of work and until ground cover is restored. ■ ;MyiSi: yy-i^ST m m Itv. y /H iXr- if 4: irV l-.- i'^rt li. i - r :;■ U 4^^PI!?s:4sv 'y-ry:y0i^:§{^i.i :■' '. 1--V- . .■' ■ ■■ •••■•^-44=/:n MM "0,■ 0,•4 •n:1k'- .y~l l':' w00m00yiMy::m-- i: : iH l:..' m •sv=-?:4; ryymyym Ff•1. : ;■* 'v' .-.v :»’* .■ *■ 41 . I*’ J'-i ' •'.:V:;-;!<if'i4;ir ■ !.. ,)y,^y jj ..A-*?: ail, v«. ii mpj^ Cou^se^rteni50* (you can obtain • A-603 Governmant :o each of the names itours) if land Lrements)* separate list of on. ication. Please re information has .on is complete. )ate on required or 11 fees and/or 1 certifies that est of his/her ation and further :affr consultants, for purposes of tfs^b.£or« the I held on the LI scheduled applicant is ;s to have an ing 4 zoning '■Kii ■■■Aliite i.= .•••■ /•LAmi;:;v VWlii •i. > > •■• r ■ : -“tr • i ^ ..V; ^ . ■■ ■• J-m H !■’■•• •*. >-.■ •• ' ir :'■■■■ ’V" ■ •• .>r ?A.-' •» ■: Jp^l S ■’>* Ki m:.m '■ ■■ v.-(! < 4 ■•«, Jl 7^1 •»•. ;i Tr., iff-k: W : A' A - ■ A '; - mi-4-'• ■ ■ ■' ■■ -0":■- ■. '. i;-r^k i/.I^ / I'/ ‘ rmrf--', <'V >4*an ■in »7/m/»«MTOi Mt aUMPIM COUCTT MOn»TT IW«HiiHCN STSTfH 4««»««Tt 0«Et$ USTc0«e« neeree«mNMC/anw S* si-nr-M 14 M04 MSfs ro m NO 14 •MWS A m»S A Mira Jtims A EMU AS US CCAAirV M 14 Mue m SBS44c4onu NMC TA>eAVf«mm/mm U 01-U7-C4 41 MNl S4M1 MORTW ANN M J L lINMA A C K auw JOSfWI LINSU A CAHl flCLINA 4M1 NOSTN urn M MUNA »« WJ44 C aaoa Ann 0*CA NAie Yanaavca MMC/AMa M A1-117-A4 41 AAA4 AA4M CO At NO 14 M t MCA A c A AlCIt *SAt t A CAAOtf A nCK A«s CO AS m 19 nua fn sss44 OMNiN NAie TASeAYCA HAMC/AOOA SA Al-nr-M 44 SMI ODTBS CO M NO 14 EOrtAe A HifNAN ET AL tOnJK) A MITN HCCMMt 70S CO AS 14 MAOe Ml S5344 c oncA Nve TAXAAVEA NAra/AOOi JO 04*117-23 23 OOAS A4440 NOATM ASH DA N SAL IVCASON OANIEL a LINDA IVCASON 4440 NOATM ANN DA hound NN 55344 f r ram ADDA OtCA NAME TANAAVCA NAME/AOOa SO 04-117-23 23 0008 AOOSO AOOAESS UNASSIONFa AOHIN OF VETEAANS AFEAISi NOAKAN F a LINOA OCSTREICH 4740 NOATM AAN DA mound m 55344 '“•*4 tl>\..;V:''.' .'^"-'.-':. ;..S 34 01-117-24 14 00»«A4tS CO m MO 19 4 C A 0 L K COAHICA JDHi C MC COANICK 42S CO AD MO 14 mound NN AS344S4 01-117-24 41 0008 AMOS CO AO HO 14 MWnilT C NELSON SCOTT A AATAICIA NELSON SOS CO AO 14 mound N4 5SS44 34 01-117-24 41 soil 00415 CO AO NO 19 STTVCN A KSmjHUS STEVEN A 0EA81E OOSTMLN* 435 COUNTT AO 14 MOUe >M S5S44 S» 01-117-24 44 AOOt OOOOS CO AO NO 14 DUANA C NaNOK ETAL BUANE C NANCK 005 COUNTY RO 14 MQUa MN 55344 JA 04-117-23 23 0004 84480 NOATM AAN DA N T A GAAHENTZ ANN CAATCNTZ TINOTMV A HICHELE CftANENTZ 4480 MnTH AAN OR N mound MN 55344 38 04-117-23 23 0004 84740 NORTH ARM OR N J $ J HE08ERG JOHN A A JANICE HE08EA6 4740 NORTH ARM DA T1 mound m 55344 i-ls A1435401434 01-117-24 1% ms 84870 NORTH AAN 88 J J A A H LUCKINi atOME J LUCKINO 4«70 NORTH AON DAI Mowe m 5534434 01-117-24 41 0003 *8034 ADDRESS UNASSlONlO NAMY a smith ETAL harm a CHRISTINA SA$3 22440 NURRAV ST SNOACNOOD m SS3S1 34 01-117-24 41 8812 •8445 CO AO NO 14 8 N mMA A K N HCJNA 6AAT M A KATHlItN N MCJMt 445 CO AO NO 14 M®*e »« 55344 4 V Z) 14 01-117-24 44 0004 88445 CO AD NO 19 T 8 Alls ARK DIES THOMAS D AIES A INTDIN K AIES 445 CO AO 14 WAJMO MN 65344 •• 4 18 04-117-23 23 0007 04700 NORTH ARM DR N A A 0 HAIJAU AAYMQNO 6 A DOROTHY HAIJALA 4700 NORTH ARM OR mound m 55344 38 04-117-23 23 0010 04740 NORTH ARM OR H AOMIN OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NORMAN F A LINOA OESTREICH 4740 NORTH ARM OR mound lti| 55344 V A-Ar.^.M;:• i if :>.3P. . .. , *;■; • 4 ■1^ 'W...fV • v-A:\f‘ I'y mm un uw» wu<wmm Aomi OMi NAHI TA>d»AYf« NAMi/AOOII 1% OieossoAVIANT IN SAO N IfOUNDfpmm Amm QNNIi HAHi TAXPAYEA NAHE/AOM S# M P0S70 AAN N08C0I 170 HL HOUND i PNOP AODN ONNIi NAHI TA)9AYI1I NAHi/AIMNI IN M 0OA40 A A P MNi I 440 HL HOUND (OIMII NANI TAXPAYIi NAHI/AODll Sa 01 000S6 DAVID I2ZAT not 1 NAPLE OIMII NAHi TA>0»AYEN NAHi/AOOfI lA m 0D40f LAKEVl lAKEV] aS5 PI HOUND PPOP AODN OltCR KAHE TAXPAYER NAMI/AOOR la m 00710 0 1 V GRANT 710 N HOUND ! . *• y ■ f rJ =•■:. >. J - • . •«■> . v' -.'- V- V ::■: ••V...^ife: ;J-i;■41^.'m:t!>.;■>^' if^-r • • -t* V .•: ’.EPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 4»0SASSIGNED NA HEJNA HAIJALA 0 M FAIRS TREICH 'IT V* , - . ^ 'I I t:jLX. X- k Li' ■ M m -■ ■'• i ^mmI ■: '^^ms^^rnmf : : :v . ?‘v . ' • .•I 4.f1 LA :\ =VriJ.'.j’.M Mi«aiKtS5;iSa •• :^- '•-. : :v.m^4myymmrnm y.b> m pp-.fe .am 4W' -.m."6.^' :■p *?r •■ ; -•i I 1’;i m» 9MT§ t7/Z5/ifiATcii iit HEiKra mmrr pkipirtt rNFWHATiow irsiXEi mamrr ctHO& list mFmr m. PiASMi fAfiai Iraop Afi« CMNEA MANETAXPAYERNAHE/AMR %9 OA-U7-ES fS MU MSM HDtni SHORE M M A V A S i RtAASrvtftT ANEDi V MAASTVERT IM M MORTN SHORE M HOUND HN SS1A4 M M-U7-ES ES MU§^7m norm mt atmiORAntY FORClIi MRATNY r FGRCUR MS HE ATMER LA RSS APT LONG LAAE HN fSSM M M>117>ES M MM MSM NQRTB ARH OR N 0 € OtSQM i V S OLSON RONALD C OLMN ASM NORTH ARN M N HOUND HN SSISAPMP ADM QNNER NAHE TAXPAYER SR M*U7-IS EA DMR ma79 NORTH AW U RAN SratNRRRCQf S A HARRIET C MIH S7R NORTH ARM LANEHOUND m ssm SR M-117-ES EA MU MSM NMTH tm U NAN LARSCM mm JAN LARSON S44 NORTH ARH LA HOUND HN SSSAA m RA-U7*ES SI MO|OOAEO NORTH ARH M L H RUNSMORE A R J RUNENORi LAVfRNE H A RARiiRi OUNBHORE A2D NORTH ARH MIVi EOiil HN SSiSA i ( PROP MDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHi/ARiR SR M-U7-2S SI RMS RRAAR NORTH AM DR RAP STEMAU RENE A PATRICIA STERMAU AAR NORTH ARH RR HOUND HN SSS4A SD OA-117-n n DORA DDDSD AOMISS IfiASSrOCOt r J A S J liAMXR THOMAS J A SUSAN J MANNER SIAA DANENS M EDINA NN SSA5S SR M-I17*n 51 OROi O0S2D NORTH AM OR PAL HAICSCN PAUL A ILAIRI HANSSEN RED NORTH ARN OR HOUND HN SSSAA I ^ -iX.H f i OMNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SD OA-U7-ES SI DOM DMSD ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DAVID I CATLIN EZZAT HQU5SA 71DE TEAANOOR CIR NAPLE GROVE HN SSSAD f SD 04-117-25 51 DM7 MS4D NODTH ARH DR T A S HAZER T»3HAS 0 A SUSAN S HAZER M TEMITN ARH OR HOUND HN DS544 5R 04-117-25 51 OMD DORM NORTH ARH M H 0 A N J HOY HATTHCM 0 A HEIRI J HOY ISOO NORTH ARM OR MOUND HN SS5A4 QNNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR ( SD M-117-25 52 DM2 D04RS NODTH ADH OR LAAEVIEM GOLF Of HTKA INC LAREVIEN GOLF Of HTKA INC D5S RED OAK LANE HOUND HN 66544 SR 04-117-25 55 ODOl 0044D NORTH SHORE OR N J A H DARUTH JAHES E A MARGIE T DARUTH 440 NORTH SHORE OR N HOUND HN 65544 50 04-117-25 55 0002 04740 NEST DRANCH tO RAD HAAG ROBERT S MAA6 4740 N DRANCH RO HOUND HT4 65544 PROP AOOR QMCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO 04-117-25 5S RODS 00710 NORTH SHORE OR H G A V NENKSTERN GRANT R NENKSTERN 710 N SHME DR H HOUND HN 65544 5D 04-117-25 55 0004 04700 NEST DRANCH RO JACK 0 A JUOY A KRAHL JACK D KRAHL 4700 H BRAfiCH RO MQUIO MN 65544 58 04-117-25 55 0005 0005D ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO LAKEVIEH GOLF HTKA LAKEVIEH GOLF OF HTKA INC 855 RED OAK LANE MOUND MN 55544 '■■"i (t.s IH ♦ Ml t l-v ■ri liv''';- 'a: ■K^ &:: i:K m X?i,"/J mA:r. Ir..% ,■y ;; ' ;v; ^ :0V:;/ tr. * % •-^>• V ••.;• ■ ■ • A-; •- .. ■...3^.> . :: ••:y ym ifg mci»9t nti 07/M/D4 %mn MiCPMP Amm KSt€i NANI TAXPAYER NAHR/ARDR SR 04-117-21 SS D4AR0 mST DRA JOHN I RAKER JOHN E RAKER 44M N DRANCH RR NOUNR HN 66544MOP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR ID D4-U7-25 54 04SM HESr DRA 0CIR4A E HAGER DONNA E HAGER 46D0 N DRANCH RO HOUND HN 66544 Ir J ONNED NAHI ^ TA)R»AYER NANi/AOOR ID 04-117-25 42 M6M NORTH AR D V JOHNSON 8 P iRYCi V I PAULA 680 NORTH ARH OR MOUND »RI 66544 ( MOP AOOR ONNER NANI TAXPAYER NAHI/AOOR 58 04-U7-2S 45 004D0 NORTH AR RICHARD 0 HOLLAN RICHARD 0 HOLLAN 5648 COLFAX AVE HPLS HN 66408 PMP AOOR ONNER NANI TAXPAYER NAHE/AOORr 58 06-117-25 65 00710 riORTN AR JERRY 0 OLSON ET JERRY 0 OLSON 710 HO ARH DR HOUND HN 65544 9^r I^ROf) AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO 0A-U7-ES 43 007A0 NORTH ARI HALFRIO LARSON E NXLLIAH SCHHITT 760 NORTH ARM OR HOUNO m S6S44 C £<• ymJiill y4y:’'y •srT.---y tT NO. PX4S5401 PAGE 5GHOPiMSNORi ■... s ;.v -r - ,Sd ^.,1 \ IGNED INC =1 =te 3P1 K|^ >' jp;^:%mJ^M m ^"rM ;.'■:-*-:4J ft.■- - ftrmm mn 97/n/n utm m Hn#CPI!i! OWBTT PfWPCKTY X>gaBiATIiat SYSTEB nanMvt cm^is ii^rPK3P mm wmn NAHi TA>9AVfllmm/M§m it •ft-117-IS SS OOM 0A4» »€S7 tfUNCS »JOHN t MACft JOHN i MUS 44M M ifUMCM fli HOUND m »ift4 S8 Dft-ll7~» SI DOD7mos% ksxmzs uhassicheoAAAIVUM COiF Of MIKA INC tAKfVIfN OOlf Of HTKA INCDED OM LftMim ifti44C8#CD NiHi TAHPAYCA it M-117-IS S4 m 04SD0 HIST DDANCN DONNA E HAfiU OQItIA I NAOift 4ftDD M MANCN DOftO FOUND MN 6DS44 it Dft>Il7-» S4 0002 msD mms& imrsiGNED iA&CVlCN GOLf Of HIM€ TONKA iAIUEVUH OOtf Of MINNETONKAODD DED OAK I AMM ftSSAA TAKPAYfD NAME/Affi» 10 Oft-117-ES 42 0000 00000 MOOTN AON DO 0 V JOHNSON ft P 0 JOMftSON ma V ft PAuu 0 jqhnsqn 000 Norra adh do HOUND MN 0S144 SO D4-117-2S 42 OOOSO AOODESS UNASSXCNEO VICTODIA ESTATES IttHEQNNillS VXCTQOIA ESTATES HQHEONMEDS C/O THGNAS MAZED SftO NODTH ADM 00 MN SSS44 POOP Aim ONNEO NAME TAKPAYED NAME/AOOO BO Dft«lI7>2B 41 0002 00400 NOOTN AON Oil DICNAOD D NOtLANDED DICHAM 0 NOtLANDED BS40 COtfAK AVI S NPtS MN SS400 SO 04>117-2S 41 0001 00700 NODTH ADM DO GDEGODY M HADTY CDEQODY M HADTY 700 NCXTH ADH 00 MOUND MN 05144 PDOP AODD OMNED NAME TAMPAYED NAME/AODD BO 04-n7-2S 4B 0005 00710 NOOTN ADM 00 .^DDY 0 OLSON ETAL JEDDY 0 OLSON 710 NO AJOt DD FSUND HN 65144 10 04>117-25 41 0004 00740 NODTH ADM OH E 6 E NAGOfDG ETAL E 6 NAGOERG 740 NO Aim OD HOUND MN 55144 PROP AOOD CNNED NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR BO 04*117-21 43 0008 00740 NORTH Aim ODl HALfDIO LARSON ETAL HILLIAM SCHMITT 750 NODTH ADM OR MOUND MN 55144 10 04-117-ai 41 0004 00770 NODTH ARM OR LARDY M JOEL ET At LARDY N JOEL 7/0 NORTH Aim RO MOUND MM 55144 TO mmmmi r- ".te;V.j’P:VPP.,..P ■: f p'fV/P-P: :;p iNKiiii -a . r>:-: :■ x-y'ixx AX''-xyX: RLPQiT MO. PX415401PROD 4 mm iATE 07/4vat10 04-117-21 11 mm 044f4i NEST tOANCO DO M L ft J f SCHULTE IQCHMEt L SCHULTE 4440 M OmCH HO HOUND Iff 1514410 04-117-21 S4 DDOl 04S20 NEST DHAfCH RO D N HAOOEN ETAL 0 N MAOOfN 4520 NEST ODANCH DO H0ur« m 55144so 04-117-21 41 0001 00450 NORTH ARM DD J DAALCIILE ft E SCHOONO^ JfffIttY D DDAUCNLE AND ELISA M SCHOONOVED 450 NODTH Aim DD HOUND m 55144 10 04-117-21 41 00720 NODTH ADM DD J S LEECH ft V I UlS’LEECH J S UECH ft V i LAIS-LEECH 720 NORTH ADM DD FE3UN0 MN 55144 10 04-117-21 41 0007 00750 NORTH ADM DD HILLIAM L SCHMITT H I SCHMITT 750 N ADH DH MOUND MN 55144 10 04-117-21 41 0010 00780 NORTH ADM DR D A CARLSON A H C RAY D A CARLSON A M C RAY 7S0 NO ARM DR MOUND MN 55144 pMi> umOM«ll NM« TAXr.YIll SS 0S-U7-« .1 OSl OOMS NOSTH ASM SI KEITH I HEEKS KEITH t NEEKS MS NOSTH ASH DS NOUNS NN S5IAA»s6i ASmOMNES NAM TAMAVES HAM/ASOH SS 07-I17-ES 11 SOI SOSU NINOJAtfCS I NASfiAHET A SLAZEK HASSASET a SLAZEK SIS NINSJAfWH LAM nOUNP M4 SSSAA d' NfiP AOM OHMS NAM TAMAVEH NAM/AOM SS 07-1I7-EI IZ 00 OOSSO FOSEST ASM T K SAHUEL E A SAHL T K A A SAHUEL SSO FOSEST ASHS LAK mound HN SSSA4 V. ‘i no* «>os OMMB NAM TAXSAYES NAM/AOOS SS 07-H7-ES IE 0( OOOSS AOOSESS ifU B S BOSKON E H A V( 6S0SGE BOWCN/HASII SOS FOSEST ASHS LA OSONO FM SSS.A -!SSOS ADDS DIMES NAM TAXPAVES NAM/AOOS SS 07-117-ES 12 0 OOSAS HINOJAHMS GERALD S HEIGREN A CESALD S HELGREN SAS HINOJAMHER LAN HOUND MN SS3AA SS 07-117-2S 21 0 0A50S MST BSANC ROBERT S PAULSEN ROBERT R PAULSEN ASOS MST BRANCH I hound MN 5SSAA ::•■: :v h ■r.y " : §(■ ■mm■■T ;•...* I5401 m. Cs .. ..,iJM-’y k |c^ • fVfe F'. '■ f5 U f j-'i-'i ^; --^ V - ; . ; ; ; ?>■ 5 -’’'MliipM'V- -Wfv..Pi&m;r .V :;~PPiPi:K«i^i*,v.it-' • *jlHrH?L* *• '«*•■*'*j4h ^v9^ ■ *v>- •_^-r32»i#'-:'; *V^'■:. -i T'TIritii tin «?/«. VI9 mtcn Mt miiCFIB COUHTT MKJKimr wreamTioH sTsiui iriOtMTT (NCiS LISTy •*.TAXPAYERHttC/ABSl SR M-ltr-tS AS Mlt OOMS NORTH ARH M KEITH E MEEKS KEITH E MEEKSMS NORTH ARN BRnouNt rw ssJMOM«R NAfCTAXPAYERNAHE/ABDR SR 07-I17-ES U RORR ORRSS NIMUArt«R LA HARBARET a RLA2EK HANBARET a BtAZEK RSS MMJAWCR lane HQtMD Mt RRSAA‘i.l MOP AOIW OMCR NAM TAXPAYER NAHE/AaM SR 07-117-I5 It OBRR OORSR FOREST ARMS LA T K SAMUEL A A SMXL T K A A SAMUEL RSR FOREST ARMS LANi mounR mn sssm c i •.!*.■■ . PROP ADOR OMNER NAM TAXPAYER NMC/ABSR SR 07-117-tS It ROOT 0M3R ABORESS UNASSIBNEfi 6 B RORKCM AHA VOLPE BEORU BatKON/HARILYN VOLPE ROB FOREST ARMS U ORONO Mt fiSSM PROP AODR OMNER NAM TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SR 07-I17-2S It 0020 OORAS HIMDJAMMER LA GERALD R HEL6REN A NIFE GERALD R HELCREN e*5 MINDJAMCR LANE hound Mt SSSAT ^ PROP AODR 5R 07-117-25 21 0014 0450S MEST BRANCH RO OMCR NAM ROBERT R PAULSEN TAXPAYER ROBERT R PAULSEN NAM/AOOR m C r 450B NEST RRANCH ROAD MOUND Ml 55544 I. '-V>^ •'-V' K-,* :;v: »55%1 Vr- -I SR RR-117-21 AT RRRl ftOm NORTH ARM RR V H LARSON ASA LARSON VINCENT M LARSON 7T0 NORTH ARH M Shound Mt BSSMSR R7-117-tS It RRRI ORRSR ADDRESS IMLSSIGNER LAKEVIEN GOLF W NTKA INC lAKEVIEM GOLF OF NTKA QC BBS HER OAK LAM HDUMR Mt BBSA4SR R7-117-tI It OORA eiMO FOREST AMIS LA ROYETTA 1 HARCOTTE rciyETTA t HARCOTTE RAO FOREST ARMS LA HOLMO Mt 5SSAT SR 07-lI7-tS It 0010 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIGNEB H A H HC ELLIGOTT HICMAEL A FU«Y NC ELLIGOTT RIB FOREST ARMS LA mound mn bbsat SR 07-Il7-tI It 002T OORAO NtMTH ARH OR RAJ DAVISSON KMALO A JUDITH DAVISSON OAO N ARH DR hound mi 55SAT SO 07-117-25 21 0015 OATSS NEST BRANCH RD JANE E KLINE JAIC E KLINE AT5S NEST BRANCH RD mound Mt SBIaT ' j. S--'v V' V - •.-3L-A:i■nrrWPQRT m. ilTS»uSR BA-tl7-tS AT RRIA ROMO NORTH ARN RR R M FRANZEL IT AL RICMUM H FRANZEL RRR NORTH ARN RR HDU« M RSSAT J-» B7-ll7-tS It RRRO (OOROR FOiSST ARMS LA IR H ROMtEHA a J R ROKCm ROMRT M A JAMS R idOCHA RRR FOREST ARM LAmoum mi bbsotSR R7-II7-tl It 0RR7 OORTO rOREST ARM LA D J FARLti A i C FARLET D J FARLEY A E C FARLEY RTO FOREST LRHS LA QRQHO Mt !'>BSM SR 07-117-2 1 It 0011 00R2S FORE >T ARMS LA JAN KRKH JOHN C A ItARtON BURCH 02S FORREST ARMS LA mound mn ! B3«T I:: • I SR 07-lI7-t5 It OOSOt 00R7B MINDJAMCR LA MARY J VOGEL MARY J VOGEL R7S HINDJAMHER LANE HOUR) MN SB5AT ^ V.- > so 07-117-25 22 0014 0442S NEST BRANCH RO J A A J D RUCE JOHN A A JOYCE D RUCE 179S0 FAIRHOMES LA HAYZATA MN 55591 mm mmB : -^0^ ■ ryy- a: PAi“iilWffiii ■■■■ ■ ■■ \ ki r ,. ' 5:fy' ■ -- : • :> * f 3^^■A■■■lii"..mm MTf •7/10/54 iATCH mtipmm AOMmmt mmTAXiATIAmm/Amm TDTU iAtCilc<ar c ( •n:i r r S'•A:> ■ ’ VJfr;002 001 ■’; *. •: •*«v ^ ’ . Y !.*• * *• ] -'■yAA::A,l\- :A '.A - yiA r m-AA A-m-yA : A- A- Ak- . A yA:-F- iSfPii A:m k\.’iawgiia vV /ii^liEMliT HO. Pl<i5540J PAGE 77'ZS 44 0014 MTH ARH DR EL ET AL FRANZEL ARH OR SS1447-23 12 0004 OREST ARttS LA MA a J R BOttCHA a JANIS R BONNEMA iT ARMS U 65344L17-23 12 0007 FOREST ARHS LA LEV a E C FARLEY LEY a E C FARLEY EST ARHS U t>5364 L7-2t 12 0011 FORE AT ARMS LA tCH lUR :CN BURCH EST ARHS LA iS344 1 -117-23 12 0030 hinojahher la VOGEL VOGEL lOJAFtCR LANE «4 65344 17-23 22 0014 HEST BRANCH RD D RUCE JOYCE 0 RUCE IRHOHES LA MN 55391 at 1 -v i ''' ^ mm:.• 'F.J ■Vjv; ■; .ii- ■■’-ipmK Wi: r . mirnimimmM mm: iiiOT if' ^f;' kx xy ^ ■vM mm ..j-.4- >-'X. -■•F-^^yy X •.:,.mm^.■ ■■• 'f' -x :.. X ■■■: '-:vX-'f k:-.’ V '.••!’ NiXk ’'.:X:X^X.?v■XiX;X'5^XX'Sfwyyyy?iadHlHfeiiiW iATi *T/»/W9 BATCH M2€OMCR NAHETAMParfR TQTJtt. UTOI MIHE/iHRHl<;i ‘No* f « yyH ip, iila: ^ [ . ( I r L.v- r n f;:r • - ■ '■■ X;Xk:."^ X'• ■■•■»■■' '-ii •- • •-■-•* .• . ■ - ■■ ::-:i .-.yx^ m -''■$yy<*,'■ - X-'V.V■ X'-W,M•:::, =;,y. : X y;-Xr,V;x'.^^-|:riMEiMiiM COUNTY pmmwn irrraraTiQfei %mmm MSJPttTY GNNCJI3 UST wrair NO. F14SMI ^Aet icrus G00T2 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REFRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESEHTAT20N OF INFORMATION AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE ON THE RECQROSi % '.s?"jL ”r"*'"" Ts:" T”"’ ™“"' DATE : ,r'X' 'fx ■•> .'yv? ::•' yX-y-j x-x;.;k; - ;xx -7^ XywXESstsi -f iHKVi’k. «:yx:^XJk-'- W m§r .v.> ■ •.kli•X-- m-- fe-y yX'' PX" . -;y- “.xV-i Hki Xyyxfff'X;: : y :fk:x:yff :. "yXf^-X -.'y -;•■ ■- • ,X ••.■ ••.■.■ f •: Ar .■•* , ^77 -m I •W-i. •v: ... -vv i mm.: i './ %vr vv- X 1^ WAx. : -v^y-:, yyy,i^yfcAX^X-SliLXL..:y'XkL^&yXfyx'XFiXXXkk':^ Xf: vuX:.%-*yy.,yxmiiiiife" Y. 1^- m ,*V '. t ^xlT'y' -rX; ttyy: X;xx KX ■k ’XlfSIfyy: ykw *y:AAxAyf;^|il mm K Jl •-■«i ,■ *-’.fm mi-••<;•<-vj^t'«* y>‘••^*^;m>»»- . • ■. .^« ' ,. •»■ •jC * i^'m-'m "^ ■ “ *.' ^ •. - •• ••ri .^ ■■> r ^7 • ■ •■ %• <X>-ll7-ci3-0 ^7:. ■:■:■ 7-7 ::'7or.A_: :7^k^Mi777 y “i m ■■'i : ^06?//7-, ..i'^ ■#’ -V' 1E7:77¥-V&:.:7:^ r-i i'&-^ ■ • »y- ■'- . ;>.■§m L^V3fi^^rr?5i i^iiii MmM i mi ^ .• •*. * n ■•.■•••■•• ^Mt |\. .' - ■■' ni: ' . -. ^ '■ V.r; ■ r^^‘'y-s•' rmy^ f" %m7 7j ■ ,»*;'■ •- - y- yll : .: . ‘■.. /* •* i mmmM M7'77mmssmy 77 :-y. I it* hrtr~T iitf''■^■^■7- y.i ,. V - .y : ■ .. .^ *i!^^.^;. Vh^_' .•' •■:• . ' = • .-.y-ia *>* 'Ti ifr' "m.7-mKy:yO /V-vv'^-y'.;vc.7-7::;-y.jyyj;/-y■ -'V ;. r: ;-vvw -.^ 7777m^^.y 'y . :;■' • •^..r.im : .77: yzi:'77y?7;v .<. X-V. ••■;.=:. .:; ; .... .. ‘--W-C :. %> j fc-iiv-v ^=:'.yyLA‘ = it^7. md I#: -f ■ ' 'j'r?: * -‘‘J .? 1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderfilc & Associatesincen A Architects Aiigasc 17. Xtf9 City of Oroao Box «6 Crystal Bay. IS SS321 ▲ttni Jsaxma Mabustli Eai 139->1447 Lakavle* Golf Coarse Rectmscruction of ^ Tees and Z'Greens W 5 Dear Jeannet Ve have revleved the proposed reconstruction work upon greens and tees at the) Lakeviev Golf Course. The earth work prepared will not adversely affect th« site drainage. If you have any questions, please contact this office Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIE ti ASSOCIATES, INC. Michael C. Lynch MCLtdf 2335 VX^st Highway 36 • St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 :yn7^77i7:7 " / ' fcii -. ■.:.! :•• v; : ..^ = .; •:•. ;••':<M ...' • v.lfvr ■> ■■■^ '^77 : Vy-;>v • - Vt as A i • - • ' . .'..■ : ..' . ■• .. ' ■•• .'•: ■ . •- . • •: ; -.•• . V ;* , 77: ■:v'.. .. ^. • '■ -■ :■ ■■ '• ■.■■.■-■ i - i.^ ;- •• v: / . ^v-1 Phsp j CjfMtf Ff U«t 0 VMIH P6 Thomas t Anaenon. A iA Gary r tyiandFr Ft Charm A Cnckson tfOM Fwttutmy Kartan M Ohor^ Susan M Etwrtm C PA 1 t«et at tha r affact the ■’■' • •■ 'V' J'-vs ^ iaj::y ^;^aa?jp ■::^m I S!S Topographic Survey for Lakeviea Golf CoufSt in Section 6-117-23 Hennepin County. Minnesota -------------- \ \ \ 4 COUNTy f road ^0. i^Sl Scale Date Datum - -9Y¥------- 'SOSa 1 inch = 50 feet 7-26-89 Mean sea level Existing contour t’roposed contour COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota \ m p mm y ■'I • ' '•* mm«vi •>r?« ^V: ■il * T?:S- m-i ■•■•■4' •' . ■ ■ V - ■? ••: •■ ' • - -I • -^.u- m w '. -4 ...•.;->v X - 4. * rl'vi^ 1 .t v^-. ’ •■• »:n Scale Date Datum _ - fTS— - w- ---------^ V-;^k '.\' 1 t 1 inch = 50 feet 7-26-80 Mean sea level Existing contour Proposed contour M COFFIN 4 GRONBERG. INC. Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota •Vf-V i •f1<*'■••-' r.1 ^.■■-.• r- -vV*' .-^jjl ' \ •:alH . , .f>' '; .•■ •.■-■ •:r* P..:^' •.: ' l-i- ■ ■■' ?*• - :■ : 'x.-';' f.v. . ' ^■C & _i*L : . .V ' -ikai iiaSiTo*'I Imlnlstrator toad - for enclosuro of it extends 12* In dcover hardcover facta I Intensification led structural season porch or 1 patio deck area This area is a and should be rea. :e adjustment of 85 Includes Lt in 85 erty Owners 7 ■iv.« : -v,-. wiy fli^ f :A-f; n/■fULii; ir. • 7v>:;. .■7::7 -- •^:;:,•^■.■.■ ,^*7 7'-‘7 ," rr.*', \» ■:.;-v.--. ::■ . 7 r - • V'./: .7 - 7 "a:.77:,7y7P 77:*^ ,.10 7 7v.T.:5i^ iiiild' ■f.,:■ ■■7 toning Pile 11449 August 30* 1989 Page 2 of 3 ■mview of Application - The applicant proposes either the enclosure of the second floor area as a three season porch or to roof the deck for the purpose of protecting existing lakeside windows of residence* p^i* Q^uy*s policy there is no difference in either the three ^•••on porch or the deck that would now be converted to a porch (roof covering). The portion of the structure that is to be intensified is located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Total property outside of 75 setback area is almost competcxy covered with hardcover improvements. Pinal building permit in x975 was issued with the second story shown with staircase on south side. In reveiw of the non-encroachment section there is nothing in the ordinances that would suggest that second story staircase at a 3 1/2' width would not have to meet the required 10' side yard setback. Mote the approvals of the original variances and renewal variance were conditioned on the fact that the structure would have to meet the 10' setback standard. If approval is granted for the enclosure of the second story deck* staff would recommend that the staircase be removed along the south side of the lot line. Please review the non­ encroachment sections of your ordinances to confirm Interpretation of staff. (Section 10.03) Please note that both adjacent neighbors have been advised of the Improvement. Staff has received no cotonents from either neighbor regarding the proposed improvement. Mr. Pirich may take issue with staff’s request to remove the second story staircase structure that encroachs the south yard setback area. In light of the directives of the ear'ier variance reviews, the current variance application and excessive hardcover on the property, staff must request the removal. Although this proposal does not involve increases in hardcover, staff wold recommend that the applicant consider removal of the excess amounts of paving within the street yard of the property. Applicant should be asked to respond. Options of Action - 1. Denial. If denied Planning Commsision should refer to the necessary findings in Section 10.03, Subdivision 3 (B). 2. Approval. If approved the following findings and hardships may be considered: 1. Original building permit for existing residence approved the second story deck. 2. The proposed construction does not involve expansion beyond the existing building envelope. * >‘Ji ; i ■V..’ ■ .7- . • i P7777-. .. • . ’4r-r .V . **•7: ^ ■"; k'' 7.- . iy =•' ’V;-' if rw.. '■ :•^ •>%• -Vifi!:.f-Pii^ 7'-■mm mmif;:-:;h i.*£*»***■ • ''^* » ^ ■ sS#- slosure of the second > roof the deck for the I windows of residence. :e In either the three 3e converted to a porch :ructure that is to be erage lakeshore setback Btback area is almost iments. Final building cond story shown with f the non-encroachment ces that would suggest ridth would not have to Note the approvals of nee were conditioned on bo meet the 10* setback enclosure of the second he staircase be removed Please review the non- llnances to confirm bors have been advised no comments from either sment. Mr. Pirich may nove the second story >uth yard setback area, r variance reviews^ the sive hardcover on the Although this proposal , staff wold recommend the excess amounts of erty. Applicant should nmsision should refer to Subdivision 3 (B). following findings and for existing residence s not involve expansion pe. Lin' ....““■:r-"X .=.. mm ^ty. ■: , y w’'. ■W -vd . ■ mm ■A mmm r' yy:M Al' krt-y i;:H r V'0%fj*- vr. :^-y- tr SSI V-'-f'V- m -ft i Bk-yyy: /■ ^v::^ 7 :-7 :.. ..-: ::••■■ =:'..•■• ' ... - M. <r--.■ k'wmstoning Pile tl44» August 30* IfIf Page 3 of 3 2. The City ha* received no negative comments from the ntOBt affected neighbor* on the adjacent properties. Conditions of Approval* 1. Kemoval of second story staircase that encroach* south side setback area located I 1/2* from lot line. 2. Other conditions Planning Commission appr^riate. feel y.L ■ 5.'mi *4'^.% 7. ■ - I ■ ' A I'M V,v; , i'A r * myymnm ' 7'V - ^V-* mm '■ r/' m v\ : ' ■v=I \fk ■i 1 »:• ■.; •.-■ I , psonomr LooiTioa • -.n'/l)^\cm €» oBomo - variaks afplicatios Receipt-Initial Application Pee ‘fTso.^ditioSii^T;($50.00 per eacb additioiun'^rariance) Reneval Variance Pee $75.00(no change fron original application) After-the-Pact Pees (Double application fee)#-j_449 ii# • a Site AddressjI/.A3^ "3 / j., *1*1^ Property Identification Krasber (P.I.D.) /7-^ V % (^QO 3 Please check one - Property X' abstract or torrens? - - Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Na»e IpjL'llcK Phene (hone) yffjrS'C Phene Ivozk) */7/ 7 ( C Address; City; lip; , OII8n (if different than applicant) HasM Phone (hoM) Phone (work) City;Zip; jthtu,K isnA (month/year) I (do) (do not) also ovm the adjacent parcels of land. PRBSEBT USB OF FBOPBm Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Other (specify) ( Residential DBSCRlPnOM OP R]T 3^ Estimated Construction Cost % 0-6 Describe request in detail; VARIAHCBS RBQOIRBD Lot Area ____ width _____ Hardcover Rear)/« -iances (Front Sidi© IPPv ' W /m: > \ ’ -. i ■• .-. t 'a^ ■>•'H.-K. '"V9^m;.hardshipDescribenforce DBSCRlFflOB Describ Code Re 8. IIRBO SOI Complet CertifJ this li 348-32: Stamps names ' obtain< Certif) Topogri in exi Plat M. As an any ot Additi The Applic remember t information Certificati Zoning off! afplicaiit*i The appli* requested unusual exi the inforn knowledge. yf Applicant' OHIIBRS 8161 The owner authorizes agentsf Co tion and v Y Owner's Si Applicant Planning C third Moni review mee unable to authorized Office of mmReceipt- - W »■ ? / :| .: : AP •’- •--iT.V . o ciU^ 3 .riC:f ^ JJ* ;.-V in- - / reS'C l-n 7 / S“ C Zlpt Zip: th/year) Residential t $ ^6~2)Q ^ Rear) mm.p-' ‘V- •;^ • • mMMJBXStar ^.h;„ or oractical difficulty resultinf fro« strictDescribe undue hardship . —— "■-enforc«ii«nt of soning regulations..—-- - - --cc^u^c. .tth lonm Code Requireasfints: ----~ " WXOIOTMBD StnSKlVBdJB - Co«pl«ted of owners within 150* (you must obtain certified Property of Finance Jl-603 Govt Center this list fro« Hennepin County Departmeu^ As an addendum to PJ notified of this application. ________ I. Xddlrionax ii-cwa •• ";;;iTi;r;i;r^;-z;;ir/o;;«»;rt";rrvr/u;« rp;ri-c«icn x, c<»pi-. . Date -----— Zoning official's Signature apptiCAWT'S SIGHATiJkB all information required or u„2.u.l exp.nses »nd correct to the b..t of hla/h.r the information supplied is true knowledge. /rx^::. sx^otote o.t. ^/- J'l / S± ^wnVrTJ^y acto.X.d,e. c\\^“/tVff? authorxt.s r...on.bX«J^ntry ,P Jf^ters for purposes of inv.stx,*- agents. Commission members, ana u tion and verification of this revest. . / ^ , / cn OTU-c ^;u;irt”m7s7h7vVa7l submittals^in^ Planning Commission Mee 9* applicants must be present at a , s ig to attsnd a "“Ya",’' and to a“vXs. the BuXXdXn, . XonXn, authorized agent attend in your place ana ^*vO • » Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^ rv ^ fW' M'<- , ■ ?I* '-■r •>r mma^mmmds&imrom strictith Zoning[»ust obtain ;ovt Centerach o£ the ess labelsequired. siny changes ite list of n. Please the above complete required or fees and/or rtifies that of his/her j'l / and further consultants# f investiga- ■■ » ^ ^ ^ ** sfore the ,d on the cheduled Licant is » have an 6 Zoning liMi ■ ■ •> "'mm um wi/zi/mMfOl Mi mfmPTH caowTY MOiiimr tnFmmjtm «TSTf?i fWUTf <0NrCB LISTSi ir-117-fS it m•mi wmmmm i c A i c A fvummC A A C A rMiHMmatzata m Min Si |7-llt<ts •tm tlOMI tfi CSSrfSI AICiiAM i AOUSII ttst HIMriPM M MAYTATA HN MStlM l?-tl7-« it OMi miA MAiYMDQO M JAICl i MTiHANM ITAitfU MYZATA m sisn Si 17*n7-tS it MM •tiM stmrmm m J • ELH9UIST i • H fUSlUIST J i A f M iLMUSsrttM MMYMM MMAYTATA M SSSSlSi 17-117-tS if iM7 •tiM mmrnxm m • A i MTAS MMAti r Mf AS tlM IHMYIMi M MAY2ATA m SiSil ii I7-117-tS iS Alts •tm SHAiVNDM » M i HiY ^ A J S HIY mUXAN N MAY Ji ttSi SMASYMOM M MAYZATA m MS 91 Si 17-117-tS il ilti •ttif SNAOYMOM M • A I NiISS •QNALi II MilM ffiS SNAOYMOM M MAYZATA m SSS91 Si 17>117-fS iS •liS PtZtl SNAOVMOM M rtOMI C ilAMQNi RAYHONA A iXANNE rSCOlUCUCil tf27 SNAOYIOOO M MAYZATA Iti S5Sn BP Si l7>117-tS iS Oltf •ttS7 MAOYMOM M 0 L SCmmR ASH SCHUDCfl OANUi I A SUSAN M SCHUDAi ftS7 SNAOYMOM OOAO MAYZATA HN SAS91 Ii l7>U7-tS iS OXii ittti SNAOYMOM M JAY ilENCi Smm i TODD mifl 2229 SHAOYMOM AO MAYZATA HN SSI91 .-.i^M JlUJ lis^Vir;:-‘::'^>V ■' ■’ ■ ■'• :' ■■V-. •■■ • -i'.'-- '•; ' A‘ •. /V- ,_.;_iS-^W!;|^‘waritM cffftnnr fiorcurf tmammrtm trsTtnMomn mmm ustr y^::mmir. •• . V --t-t - •f»Mt MO. P1%IM1tMI «#1449 iii I CfUTiry THAT TMt r*CTS MMfSiNTEB All AN ACCWATt A» TW*_______ ItMESCHTATIOH OP INFOnMTlON AS IT AIPCANS IMIS lATI OH TMI HtCORDS or TM «Ii««M COUNTY OfPAITHIHT OP PIOPMTY TAXATION, TO Til MST OP NY ANOMLEDGE AND BEUEF. _ C:g-g- Mkm.- •i,V ■.■:■:■/■.w ;•■::•• *• ■.:;■ mSM ■mm W ' ? ■ ^ w-mm .;’.■•■■; ■-■vm . v'v:iii■S« V f, If ^ ^0 \ y.4 jt^ \_______,t./•*d.44 (V)7^ >4 XT <oVi T NO. M4SBM1 PAOC *A A RECORDS lE BEST -IvSMim:^m .vV.^.;iv;: •; ^ >:. / *':7v. i\-.: ■ • .y' ^f^'■ :'-r^ .. ■ -V Mi .nip-: ■■: v: ;■‘X '■''^H^'u'''\•’CI (‘‘H77iHALCYOMV A MOLLVmif4$ m .■■■■'.-■-r^^jlip-■. ' T^ - • ,. .•••■;:v •:; '^y^ry^yyt '* ' 4 • jf fAir-aat, 1^«r%.. ;J7-//7^z^>(^144 *,s^ I vV'*- / a N ■K^ /' Tt A ^‘Si/ ^ '■'*” IV k ' I ' ^ i. . X ^ ^i-i*#?!/:! It I (25)►l-N ^y^"J^.’'-.v 1 'U. •- r S y-, ;•■;!.'yd£;V A "ik- y ..-'/ -'ifliis-=■ ;. • r *.v. f^msm ‘y.--; :■. *l"-' ® ■ >:■ i 1 pm Aii'y'yy m-mmmIf ’ ,■.:, . :*r.:^w:y«iSSs;:-"-.=:^ . V:.4^ ■■•. .' A '- J- / -v ;y.:.yA..y A • ■ •.■'*A- » ^-7< A - . . ;A :.;•> •:••■ i^i •y 0.-::y'mpy P : ■«.-y. ••:vfy *■■■•-• • i", '■■<■■;:■:« y:y''.:,y^Ay:y:Cy //-AvV^^j •M*. •• •. .* ••••••■■■ V ■r::- ■..-i::-r. ■ V :./•UV/-'.:'■•:Jv -TTfCftVST4LfBAY) h 44 ^<j #1 ±<jJuly 27,1989 Oxono City Council To Who® It May Concern, ...Haitted in accordance procedures of the This letter is sub«lttea m , a rnnneil The intent of applicationOrono Planning Coamision * Council. • rectify the problem of deterioration offor variance is to rectity rn« v „l.ltin, d.ck and exl.tin, first floor -Indov. and .ntry. xttor »a„y futue attoopt. to rectify this proble. aod after consult in, professional contractor. I believe .y only ,0 ro enclose or at a olnloun cover exl.tin, struture. tb pcobleo 1. not resolved In tb. near future tbl. otrutur. o ^s-a-etivelv worse. Resulting in possible yrs. will become progressively worse. etructural d.«a,e and at a ninl.um unsightly da»a,e. Along With this letter I also suboit the necessary forms, certificate of survey and proposed plan, for structure. Thank you for your cooperation. wPi8liS£i :4t-: 9 Cur rut ZaniiMi R*IO 1/2 ACTV PropoMRf Zonifigi w-ic i/z m r^lr. Th» lot Ft 15,000 sq. ft. In a 1/2 aero Sine* »■ • hoaaM olthar sido of tl»a Plrlch lot, and tho tact n»ralyi< ra- placMfit of an oKlatlng structura, a varianoa aawa Juatlflad. Approyal of thia varianoa al»o«ld ba eondltlooad on tha f^ t^ It wain* talna tita 75* aatback fro« tna laHa or In IlM alth tl>a ytlatinq atr^turaa on alttMT alda, and that no alda yard aatbaek varlanoaa will ba qrantad. • •• ^ •, *f r’^i-v. V^M-yj.:-,,. n ;• '•/• >,;,.•/. • r-fc. /:.'^':'f:.'' .'v •,('Ik^rvLi: v?. ^I#m m A m VK < .--■ .wfoting of th« City Council,- - , X’!>74vi*j City CouTicil mot on the ebove dete wit.', the following aeabers present: Mayorwearies, Councilmen Butler and Paurua. Cwuacilmen ilassengale and lielsh absent.Paurus moved, Butler second^l, that the iiinutes of the Regular Meeting of Hay 13, 1974, be approved. Motion, Ayes C3) - Hays (0).Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to call for a public hearing on June 25, 1974 to consider those areas in which the soning has changed since the public hearings %iere held for the initial rezoning package. Jiotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0).Searles ooved, Butler seconded, to accept Mr. Van Nest's report dated Nay 28, 1974, which was related to the current status of the Orono Coiq>rehensive Land Use Plan, tlotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). The Mayor and City Council instructed the Administrator to contact City Engineer to make a reconanendation to the Council what feels would be the best ring route way to go from County Road #19 up to Highway #12. In this reconoendation, is to be included thn cost of the project, the topographical characteristics of the land, best route, and all the other engineering and cost factors Involved with a project of this type. Paurus moved, Searles seconded, to aporove the variance for lUchael Hlrsch, 3548'Zvy Place, but to include the two conditions as stated in Dexter Marston's mem«-> are to be applied, as the hardship in this particular case is the lot dimension and the trees that are involved, iiotion. Ayes (3) - Nays (0). ®'^kler sioved, Searles seconded, to approve the variance for Michael Pirich, 2224 Shadywood Road, with the understanding that no side yard variance be allowed and that the house must be consistent with the 75' setback requirement of the ordinance. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). LJ»^> ' Jtv ^ ^ 7:30 P.K.(?MINUTESPUBLIC Bezoaiag C UATBC»1P8]ISZVB PLAN RING ROOTB VARIANCB 3548 Ivy Place 43480 - 1000 Lot 174 VARIANCE 2224 Shadywood Road 43620 - 2800 Block 1 > Lot 10 ...V mV; I ... ^.1 . .K.,i mv-. V-X-*. .<tv i. ‘ •V*' \ r" :K'■ , «k» I I %-i 1 % r [NG DATEm PtAM VTT:rT>r»«-^'ir nic'. r«T.son *\r.ich 27. 1075••ic!jel Pirich.2224 5hai1vvT»a M.anc! •- Variance-lot areaLP-ir tone. Lot reouiretnents ’5" ^,*57 feet wide with anrros'r* m i=t -idthard sn. ft. in area.ririch eade ff -r'lonin.annroved fiances‘shall expire ona year aftCT theapproval! TTierefore. another approval woi.ld benecessary.s resUe-cc which v,s nrcviouslv oc this «!“'r» srcy"r.tirsrs?,i\f4:thrc ’*.^ iVcrfci;^^hiildinc ncrrit.^irce this variance Ms been nreviousW ^n-roved 1 see no problem in univine referral MeV to the rianninr onrtission.1 ♦Kaa v/iriarirp ^iiHicct to no othct* v'STisncc^lc:-'“d;”.^S:"?roTc'-H;aS;K;osh<.rc slth.C: r^uir^ts. id ro, , r k'.V‘ ■ I . - r pip.:--'’:.-/' an area th an idth as lonini? fter the i be destroyed h wants ting a problem r .-ariances ents. ■'!'■ i-- »■;dlfr 1449^Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledganent Form1 (we) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improve'^ent or proposed use of the property located at ^ also referred to as Land Cse Application No. »I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use hut merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plana and that the pro­ posed neighbor's project or use requires City Council approval. property Owner Date 4 /C’ ‘7 operty Date If you have any information that nay assist t\e City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. %%A Mifffi pMisS mmm: 11^ ■m I r+ 'Wm i T m ¥ w ■ .*t » *Iti (T ! .,v- . ^ I ‘ i «t w .* . I ' t I f •* !♦ ! ? • . 1 • ,! r•; v» I r* 14.J r* f • »7^ rVV Ledgenent Forro he proposed improve’’.tent t ^ •Jo. this acknowledgement, I 1 or disapproval of the the City Council that I Ians and that the pro ­ bity Council approval. y/^/e^ Date Date ssist t^e City in the submit your coimnents 10 days prior to the ^ '■\r- -V • • •••; •• ISHterri-v.. :i/. 3(^-7 I ¥\ I *«***■!'* ; .' ' f; t'If'. « ^ 4 41 • h 1 ‘ # c*j 4 L' • ' Sl>' ■ - ! • t- i <- f'.u , ^ : n’l •: :■ I' ‘ » ♦ . «• 11^ 0. ■•■ .V I: *' \ • ^ r . ’ • * f' « m V7 , \ I ^ *• I 7;./ •’ • »j »f; ^ r • ’ i i. *- rr ;Vii« ■ F F ,: r , • *"eUV. >// ------------ • • '^■rr—' ■ I ■;• ••'• •: ■.,< ••...* ; ------------ -A JLx;—^ ■J; ■ ■■•ii -■'.:• ^ ^ ! » W7A ..O/ /^‘V.-C I ‘ ^ _____________________lf\ MH \J »<i5r * •-• i I > ‘ . •• • 1*. • ■ . ‘ , ;:M;. •; , ’ , ■ " >.•• .*« 1% , . ■ • .*•' •*.. “ _________t_____^___• .♦ ____1 ____________________U__________L!___^_____________________________________• ' ■ i________^^____ (M m >s>^- Tm i; 1. .1 V, •.'i, mm i • \ :*y w . .. ^ •' /AM' crir • • i-i-' ?'/ 'im .' 4.^4i •a/t• •*.*:m : :':!S1iilr■‘llliimift ^ -1* > S. •ij «»<r!I . •'1 'i:' : •.1 U): V- s f*ky; f ’ •••", '• .<> ’ •. < ■' IS-•;; ' iv. f: • W ■' i’ 1- I '* i' K ■ i' ‘ ' ni rX: ' •'rivl r* . * AVMof-.?! •^:r?;;'VjA>L|i,r^ s 'i ■ '*’“1 'U V 0 Q ' in :S.f;i?n’jV);;;\i: rliiij 'j 5 c-"' ^ Si ? < ; .i-v^f! “r:iyjiM'4Ki!u:-;‘;jl';; ?,» il :m• •“• i-ft-fc::-:-; 'V«-mm4. Hr"/ * te'- i« V-£)'- CCtAMfMIMT • V«<OtlT -oi^ i Ik ■*?? u '•. \‘ tLU. ••, ♦.« _______... e r-* V. ','■ '•V iAjS';': b -.. >-i-■t4- M. fi ’•’.A-'-M cr X i ;• r-. %-^.. •t™ >‘-■ .1 or-^-:^-, !■»mm ma-: • • ' ■ • • •'!'.■ i IsL Jik •..' ...j*ft^£_-.. .2L. ■ ':.' • ■' K » 1 l'#' ■ ■• 4,- V 1o * • \»• X \ •••s« r-7 (O -!v.' O.C. ("Y ^^'•o' C-^ ^'^ ••3. - 2.-^ •• •* I E.xroTlM6 H3iL2. E xisting Deck I v’ “ •’>H, ^ V'-. & *•)’Sj'Ce IILEVKV'.OI : 4a 4.^ ^ — • 1 * t*To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Mambara Planning COTnuiasion Chairman Kallay Orono Planning Commission Nasibars City Administrator BarnhardsonfromsiOatatiSobjactsJeanne A. Mabusth, Building i Zoning Administrator August 29, ?989#1450 Ward B. Edwards, 2474 Carman Street Renewal Variance - Public HearingZoning Districts - The building site is located in the LR-IB zoning district. A portion of the property north of the lagoon is zoned IR-lC-1. Pertinent Ordinances ~ . . , Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 i Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, request to encroach 75' setback area, allowed ■ 0 proposed « 50' Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - hardcover variance within the 0-75' setback area. a. allowed - 0 proposed ■ 2,960 s.f. or 15.8% 75-250' setback area allowed • 2,813 s.f. or 25% proposed * 3380 s.f. or 30% b. Applicant also seeks an average lakeshore setback variance to lagoon side of property refer to attachSKl survey Exhibit P. List of (exhibits - F;.nibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Resolution #1838 Exhibit B - Resolution #1288 Exhibit P - Survey Review of Application - Applicant seeks renewal of variances to the above referenced sections of zoning code to construct a new residence on the vacant lot. This will be the 2nd renewal variance of original approved in 1985. (Refer to Exhibit D) The most recent renewal variance was approved in June of 1988. (Review Exhibit E) Staff recOTunends approval of the current renewal variance application based upon the findings and conditions noted in Resolution #2462. '4r.- ^iP L .V. •* ■ . ... ; rX ■ 8 mm A' ...■■'S'.' ‘. .1 r atorhe LR-IB e lagoon division ithin the setback ed survey ferenced I on the triginal renewal !) Staff lication >n #2462. 4ii"'V ^ ■', ■■■■? I ? • . - j am Vi Lr .iV' ■■ =. \ '• - \1 ■.•i.y: - \ *f - : . *•»■" i-: - . ; i i ;■ CITY or ORoira ~ vjuiiabce ap 4 f?r n -X O U Receipt- ^Initial Application Fee $150.00($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00(nc. change from original applicaticn) After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)PROPERTY LOCATIOR £ ^ /K'CJ^TSit. //. OP ^Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ~ ((*7*"*^^ OOi ^Please check one - Property X abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Phone (home ^ ^- - - - - - - - -crC^ NameCJU~A^^ ETDAi-T-A AD-S________ Phone (work) APPLICAHT Addr.s.i3.sz,<r QL^K'HUfi.iT ^c?tY:3nu;M> OffflER (if different than applicant) nm. 3-/5/ujS- ^ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: Date Property Acquired QCT I ? <i^C (month/yea r) tj^'L I (do) (^ojno^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USB OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District A- 3_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Present Use of Property VJ* A C-/\ ^'T 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify) Residential DKC3tZPTI0R "F REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ / ^ S7 Describe request in detail: P A fH. FAOU f=OCT f^AeJ< AT n4^ mV VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances (J2l 2L Front Other ___ Hardcover Side Rear) ■ ■• .. ■•••• •..=•• Jm.Receipt- ^• a*-< • .to . « 1. . t.? tok **4 * *^KJ&90KJ0 0 2.7 (£/^ C/Vff 3 .S^c Zlo:s-rv/'6 _Zip. ith/yearl^^JWk't /qsT- Residential iH.V' ^cfWC"‘0F"t2^(F' Rear) r:»»■ «• -...•:vaV,»A'4v:;. i ; . . ' ,: v '. * ; m OUtDSHlPDescribe undue hardship or practical difficult resulting frcn strict enforcement of zoning regulations; /^TT»^Ct4t:^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _DESCRIPTION OF UNDSOAL PROPERTY CCRTOITIONSDescribe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Sonina Code Requirements; _ _ _*• **^ * • mm mm mm ^ mm mm mm mm mm ^ mm *m^ mm mm ^ mm mm » ^ mm ^ mmREQUIRED SUBMITTALS1. Completed Application Form2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center348*"327X ) • 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. ®* Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Depart'^ent that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or ^usual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/)ier knowledge• Applicant's Signature hyb\J2t^ Date^^*-^*^^ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acJcowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agentsr Commission members^ and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. ?!!!!!!-!_!^ LDi4(A^C^ Date 2_7 [9Q9 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the **i^*^^*'^ Commission Meetir j. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^ ...i; r;' • r r . . ;• = -Vv ■ : y: / ' =•>4",- ■ y. ’ti- . '■4 i ‘ ■ > • : : . if. mm ■j: resulting from stricting compliance with Zoningthin 150* (you must obtain Finance A-603 Govt Centeraddressed to each of the ress (use address labels Iculations as required, levations) if any changes attach a separate list of application, staff. Is application. Please t complete if the above pplication is complete. Date Information required or to pay all fees and/or ation, and certifies that to the best of his/her L Date^0^37 [9&9 application and further City staff, consultants, >r purposes of investiga- Date ^7 ffices 25 days before the Meetings are held on the resent at all scheduled oil. If an applicant is arrangements to have an te the Building & Zoning amI■ ■ K ■. / 1 - ,f ri4 V. , ■ ! P#iii ftDATA PRIVACY ADVISORYIn accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish cn.vti»in private or confidential inform' ation.You are notified that: The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. # If your requested permit or license reqires council actirn to approve, some information may become public. S.You have certian rights under M.S. 15.*165 to review private data on yourself. 6.Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. ^duj A^DS itSO. '’rf LOWS. Mi/- bate of birth (does not apply to buildihg/general permits) {H) 9P1- Phone I understand my rights as stated above.• • « a • • • **• * * * • ^ —’g-*-•« u • *r— Signature - - - _ _--.t.-*" . . • - . .- . ... 1 P . MM . - IM ■ • . A .MM. . -MM I WMt ■ ■■ ii—mm mm . mmm.^fm.mmrn t **■ ' T~. _ - ..^-.-1 P^" •'■'m-n ~-n3Sn wrw •— •- • ~ vt-pt . .M.M m mm. 1 ■ Ji J.-*i ■ .. » p mSt— V ^rVV i.f SJ*'4 I .4-i' W-'---S';-• 4 m ■■.. ^■;iv• . •■ -v^ ^. - V V vW**'•.■ r-t . ■■V' .■'■'.•■ .-*1'■'t^ : '■'! •"■. y ‘-'V’^i'!''-4• • ;•. >" . 'S' !••w,^ ■ ■;•mSm. ■■fib- : - ■ .^.1 ■•>■ • . ' 'VMM 6ati IViVii BATCH ••!» *PROP MNW OMKR NAME TAXPAYER HAME/AOOfl IB 17-II7-CI A] M«|• MT4 SHORELINE MDAVID CHARLES DIE ^ . DAVID C BIE >f’ISIS SHAOTHOQD ROAD IMV7ATA HN SSSSI miinEPIM GOUHTT PROPTOTT tHTfiBlATiaN STSUN PROPtRTT OUNERS LISTM 17-117-n AS BSn38 I7'II7-E3 43 SDSA'^ PROP AOOR S347E MURELINE DR OHNER HAIM .jiEORiULfL PIPER JR taxpayer ^ BEORCE-E-RIPER NAnE/AOOR SAM 8MOPftItlB OR HATZATA m 5$3tlPROP AOOR OMtER NAME taxpayer NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OWffR NAia TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 3D ED-117-n It SOQl •E40S CARNAH ST EOHARO T S SLORIA A LEHHAN EOUARO T a SLORIA A LEHTUN t470 CARtSN ST UAYZATA TM SS391 3S tO-lI7-tS It BBSS ELLEN H BUTLER LAVERNE A BUTLER IB4BS CTT RO 43 CHASKA m S53IB raop AOOR QIMER NAHE TAXPATER HAME/AOOR PROP AOOR UNER NAME lAXPAVER ' HAHC/AOOR SB tB-117-tS 12 0020 B24BB CARNAP ST ^ RICHARD A EOUAROS ✓ RICHARD A EOUAROS CTT RO IS BOX 127 ^ NAVARRE NH SS39t SB tO-lt7-2) 12 B04I EOUARO T LEHHAN A HIFG EOUARO T LEHHAN t470 CARNAN ST HATtATA Ml 55391 OAVIO CHARLES BIE DAVID C BIE I91B SHADTUDOD ROAD UAYZATA Ml 55391SB 17-117-23 4] OUTDAVID S PETERSON ^ LOUELL R timOEF laos E HATZATA BIVO UAYZATA MN 553913B 20-117-23 12 BBBtEOUARO T LEIU1AN ETAL EOUARO A 6L0HIA LEMNAN 2470 CARHAN ST UAYZATA HI S539I SB 20-117-21 12 BOtB ELLEN n BUTLER LAVERNE A BUUER I04SS CTV RO 43 CHASKA Ml 55310 36 20-117-23 12 0033 B346S SHORELINE OR G.P.M. COMPANY ALECK 6 OVERSON 5i40 nUBOELL Ave S M 36 20-117-23 12 0042 EDUARD T lEtnUN A NIFE EOUARO T LEiUlAN 2470 CARMAN ST UAYZATA MH 55191 ■pp ♦ VT REPORT MO. PI43S46I PACE t36 17-II7-Z3 41 6B9303460 SHORELINE DR DtOHGC P PIPER-JR t JpytA-lift EllYTRtir^S vn /o •ItfUA«ATA-Mi—55SBI A/A/ 5-i;yu36 I7-1I7-E3 43 611403502 SHORELINE OR GOLDEN VALLEY STATE lOPfLL R ZITZLOFF 1605 UAYZATA BLVO UAYZATA MN 55391SB tl-ll7-2I It tool 024IA CARMAN ST EOUARO T LEIUMH ETAL EOUARO A 6L(»IA lElffUH 2470 CARMAN ST UAYZATA MN 55391 36 2B-I17-Z1 ■-v HARD E EOUAROS UARO E EOUAROS 3545 CLEiaiURST AVE ST LOUIS PARK MN 55414 38 20-117-23 12 0040 02414 CARNAil ST T A 0 LII» THttlAS A LINO ' \___ 2414 CARMAN ST UAYZATA MN SS39I 38 20-117-23 12 0043 02470 CARiUN ST EOUARO T LEHHAN A UIFE EOUARO T LEHHAN 2470 CARMAN ST UAYZATA MN S539I :..--^sm“""" “WK,:?"-'™ n SUMiisr** SS-H7-IJ 12 * ^ • * < icnruH«?!*?Jni,“"'‘ ‘ ■'"«“•«»«AT* M« 55WI38 20-117-23 12 0055Jai-yle L Uphoff et 4I Jaryle L Uphoff 2497 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, MN 55331 KPWT m. e«m« Mce e“ *«-ii7-tj it essiRICHANO a RMW09 ^CHAt* A eOUAMS BOX 1*7•MJTABBt MN S539I mmmiaia ■A'■>-■ -♦'•ijl', » ’ u.^S'J '. A'••EPOfJT Mo. PI<)3S4gi PAGE z *7-*J 12 0050 * eOHABDS * EOUAROS S5J9I *MO TRUE J Oil THE records •M* TO THE BEST :=.^ .xi. yr i t"• •nL ^ i ^ • ■ » . ^ > ^i • ' I*-i--f--"* 'rv^:.**' '' i ’® ‘ *°' *’ J2i zs 24. ♦*! hv\ %t ■' ^i‘‘- '» ■> ■M *0(ill • i B 4 I t |2^ .-•('M'lf.y 4; ■ jv5 • t ■mikr:,- S,. r-. :? ‘*r tjll!^' 'il:..*\L (b*) '■ “!-^ ’A . V';K' '-^ » > V;V'- % " f-. ^ «'’* ((iV '• •»■ 20 2i It '^W • n 20 *T ' 2* -Ts :-r^.e|-*i;y v:'2 (\'^' !r. Jf-; v:- ' ■ ' 1^. . ‘^■ >>'24 k'T -^i’ ■ ■'f ^f fK' -K SV.2 6/7 TVfe 8 ■ '• -•= • •■■•= 1 • V «A 0 w t *. I'l ,r 4 i« 4« Nil- 4 » 4. ^ 4i O <•4 4t «i4 12 »» ,^.0 4> X>. >%v4 1 50' a Z 14 19 i JJf 'rr VI 1^, 1: >c 1 v|^ ^ ■ ^’ 3» i f i \ <JS If b •# ^4 f»i ^4S) •>#tor >.- 4. 1;%''’.ii 0 L • r-p t * I 4 04i,VARRC - ♦ COVE 0‘ > % v^(37) R.US llRO 01 (■•» 19 ?| 1420 4#fioi Phot / V #P5f^P.V 4/ > •' :• ;7.f-.f ^fp' i . . ,<dit ^<«v P-'-.--' ■ 4- •• ■•L,.' ■ • 7 :•V •*.•■• ■•' * 1. . 7';'.* ••* * - . * = ^ ’=: / • • • :'•' ■ /■■ -f-: : ;•■ -• •;;■ : ■ I: 1; ■*». '. ^f:>f. ■ ' SM . K'-Ti [^v-;c^:;;.-.:-, i/': '>:-j P“* i 1 £ ‘ 1^-. %; .'i ii > 1^ t •.' *. 4 » V ■•> t’Sir -V > !^ « Vr 1 '■ *' -I • CITYI Of ■ ORONO ^<S/£City of QRONOMUoumoM OP TNI crrv cotn^ua 5 ~ .A usoumoM Gsjurriiia h vmoabci to Moncipu. ZCHinMS cool SKTXOI 10.22, SUBOXVlSIOtt 1 I 2 »JB> SBCnOM 10.44, SmOXVXSXOM 0 - PU.I 10)2 mniAS, tterd B. Edward* (b«r«liurt*r “tb* applicant*) in oimcr of th* proparty locatad at 2474 Carman Straat within tha City of Oxono (harainaftar 'Ciry*) and lapally dascribad aa follofwai Lot 11, Block 0, Townsita of Laagdon Park (harainaftar *tba ptoparty*): and tfBBUaS, tha applicant has appliad to tha City for a varianca to Noaicipal Xonina Coda Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 10.5S Subdivision S to allow tha construction of a naw hoaa locatad partially within tha 0>7S* lakashora satback area whara no structures ara allowed, and requesting a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow a total of 2,940 square feat of hardcover or 15.11 in the 0-75* satback sona at the building site, whara no hardcover ia allowed and to allow 3,390 square feet of haracover or 30.0% in tha 7S'-250* lakashora satback zona at tha building site, where only 25% hardcover is noraally allowed, and ia requesting a variance to tha average lakashora satback froa the lagoon or north side of the building site. aOM, miBOIX IB XT IISOLVBD by tha City Council Of OrOBO, ttinnaaotas rxiDXics This application was raviawad as soning file 9932.1. 3.The portion of tha property to be used as a building sit* Is located in the LB-IB Single Paaily Lakashora Baaidantial Zoning District. The Orono Planning Cosaission reviewed this application on dun* 17, 19S5, and recoasMndad approval of tha propoaod variance based upon tb* following findingst A) Ho pamanant crediting of tha land north of tha lagoon is required. B) Ho lot width variance is raquirad sine* th* 125* lot width ■eats BOI or nor* of th* 140* raquiresMnt. C) A nuabar of aathods can b* used in dataraining th* actual percentages of hardcover on tha propertyi Pag* 1 of S f/<.> t .if ‘:- f a:: >NOUMnai.MIMICXPAI. I(NIS 1 k 2 PZU 1932 the applicant*) ie i within the City of d aa follows: hereinafter *the City for a variance vision 1 and 10.55 le located partially no structures are t2. Subdivision 2 to 15.8% in the 0-75* er is allowed and to e 75-250* lakeshore trdcover is noraally le lakeshore setback )ite. y Council of Orono* I file 8932 I a building site is ceshore Sesidential this application on al of the proposed ingsi north of the lagoon Be the 125* lot width ent. temining the actual tyi V-*.; “V- p r. • j 'r ■ *. .;• • *>.<• ■ ■■■• ••• ...'■ fCITYOFORONOcity of ORONOnfSOtunON os TWiaTY councilNO. ________ 7. ??.building site, the 0-75* hardcover prop^eed is 2.9ft0 sguare feet or ^A*A^ 75-250* sme is 3»3I0 sguare feet or30.01. C2) lased on also crediting the northerly portiooa of the property for the hardcover calculations, 0-75* hardcover !• 2,9i0 sguare feet or 10.51 and in the 75-250* is 3,310 sguare feet or 10.2%. *« (3) based on calculating 0-75* and 75-190* free the Ug^, only crediting the building site, and with drainage all directed to the lagoon, 0-75* lagoon setback bedcover is 14.9% (all existing driveway), in the 75- 190* lagoon setback is 34.4%, and in the lakeshore 0-50* setback IS 0%. 0) ^licant stould not be penalised for the eaiating driveway ^rdcrover in the lagoon 0-75* sone, and in fact his d^veway propM^ nininrtes the additional driveway hardcover B) The neighbors' reguest for the lakeshore setback and *y*f*?* •*^***«*‘ variances to allow for the least disruptive sightlines, to naintain unifomity, and the capability to **'*^“*?* i®®* ot relatively flat lawn area,justify the granting of a variance to the lakeshore setback. f) The uni^e characteristics of the property i.g. the proposed building site separated froa the reetof «^e property by a lagoon, constitute a valid hardship to the prepay. ri!* f/V, considered this application includingtlia xxndin9s and racoaMndatlona of thm Plannina CoaMiaaioo# etaff, coMo.-ita by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the coeeunity. ’ Page 2 of 5 ^*y%ee.a<».dfc.^ 9.--*aUiw4 WLaS» ^ -V-%* » - -i'^ed»-e’wC’. so'. -* i 4 ki-f- :■ . ■ :: ;•• i - . . .• ..V : V..;. LONGrv COUNCIL land at tha building a 2«960 aquara faat or 3(380 aquara faat or :herly portiona of tha iona# 0-75* hardcovar n tha 7S**250' aona is tnd 75-190* froa tha ling aita, and with 0-75* lagoon aatback rivaway), in tha 75- n tha lakaahora 0-50* the axiating driveway in fact hia 4^vaway driveway ha/deovar kaahora aatback and tha laaat diaruptiva ltd the capability to valy flat lawn araa( >a lakaahora aatback. t property i'.a. the a raat of the property tiip to the property. pplieation including Planning Ccawiaaion# la applicant and the ■ health# aafaty and mm.nmu• • r .. #. win: V- '• (rf • . ii.- ’i'-. A- I CITYI OF■ ORONO City of ORiRUOLUnOH OPTMCaTY MO._ _ _ _ _ _ ^'Ne City Council finds that tha Cffltditiona axiating on thie P^opafty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in thia toning diatrict; that granting the varlanca would not adveraely affect traffic conditiona, light, ax r nor poae a fire hazard or other clanger to neighboring property} would not Barely aerve aa a convenience to tha applicant, hut ia neceaaary to alleviate a deaonatrable hardahip or difficulty} ia neceseary to preserve a aubatantial property right of tha applicant; and would be in keeping with the apirit and intent of the toning Code and Coaprabanaiva Plan of the City. OOBCU81(»S. OSDIR MD OOtOXTlOMS Baaed upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby granta a variance to tha Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, SubdiviaiM 1 and Section 10.55, Subdivision I, to allow the construction ot a new hone located partially within the 0-75* lakeahora aatback area where no structures are noraally allowed, and • variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow a total of 2,9*0 aquara faat of hardcover (or 15.8*) in the 0-75’ setback aona at the building site where no hardcovar is allowed, and to allow 3,380 square feat of hardcover (or 30*) in the 75-250’ lakeehore setback aona at the building site, where only 25* hardcover is noraally allowed, and grant* a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivisimi 1, to allow encroachaent on tha average lakeahora setback froa the lagoon (or north) side of the building aite, subject to tha following conditional 1.All drainage froa the proposed house oust be directed toward the lagoon to gain the aaxiaua possible infiltration tiaa and distance. 2. 3. A site grading plan eust be subaitted for staff approval prior to issuance of a building peiait. Mo future hardcover is allowed on thia ptoperty in the 0-75* setback zone on the north side of the lagoon. Arolicaat is placed on notice that future additions of hardcover at the building site will not autosMtically be approved and would liliely be subject to raaoval of equivalent aaounts of existing hardcover. Page 3 of S *• c; .-a rsiiS3;\3i4.rt.k9Cr*‘qHf ass-c w W- r f-' :MM mM 1)9 on this ly to othsr « vsrisnca ht, air nor property; .leant« but rdship or il property the spirit *lan of the icil hereby lon 10.22/ allow the the 0-75’ lowed, and a total of ick soce at Ilow 3,380 itback tone Llowed, and to allow lagoon (or onditions) ted toward ation tiae ) the 0-7S* plicant is ver at the and would >f existing C iI- CITYI ^ 11 ORONO City of OROrVORcsraoiTKai OP THf crrv ouNciL no.___________ 4. 5. 8. 7. Lowest floor elevation suit be 132.S NSL or higher. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building persit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 8, 19SS). Violation of or non-conpliance with any of the terms andl conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the soning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a eisdsmeenor The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby •grees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of bimself. his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of July, 198S, ATTESTS borcthy H. ^llin. City Clerk (1) Property Owner Property Owner Mary c. ButlerT Mayor \ V Spous« Spouse mm ■■•j;..:’- ;;V . '-‘yi at¥OF S472790& 3 City of ORO.NOffISOLUTlON OF THE CITY COUNCIL ?40. 2462 TRANSre.1 ENTHiDCEPt Of '« i puciA ijatoLonoa oiuui¥nK:A VARIAVCS TO NOMICIPAL ZOMI«G COOK SiCTlCa 10.22» SOBOIVI8IOMS 1 A 2 A»> SlCTIOn 10.55, SOBOmSIOB • PILE tl288 >rav 4 MNN • OfPUTT HBKSBAS, Hard E. Edwards (hsrsinafter ”ths applicant") li th owner of the property located at 2474 Carman Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City”) and leoally described as followsi Lot 11, Block 6, Townsite of Langdon Park (hereinafter "thi property")? and WHSABAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow the construction of a new home located partially within the 0-75* lakeshore setback area where no structures are allowed, and requesting a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow a total of 2,960 square feet of hardcover or 15.8% in the 0**75' setback zone at the building site, where no hardcover is allowed and to allow 3,380 square feet of hardcover or 30.0% in the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone at the building site, where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and is requesting a variance to the average lakeshore setback from the lagoon or north side of the building site. ■OH, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesotai PIHDIIRIS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 11288. 2. The portion of the property to be used as a building site is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, and the portion of the property north of the lagoon is zoned LR-lC-1, One-F2unily Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict. 3. Resolution #1838 adopted by the City Council on August 26, 1985 approved the proposed variances based on specific noted findings and subject to specific noted conditions. The applicant never started construction pursuant to the variance, and the variance expired on August 26, 1986. On May 13, 1988, the applicant applied to renew the variances previously granted, with no changes from his original request. Page 1 of 5 f'■f f. {■1 imii./:■■■ a ir I i3^:';C. :- iV.:. ■ ::M'ft,.. 'WK‘,-:. * '•’t'Jf* *li*: EM «■ Wc' :lia P.v-.VT/^ PSS r. -■:: :.:Vji :■;.■• : • ; •• 5 ^<C;M wm4City of OROiVO tran ^;.. c .CITYOFQRONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2462 #PT r*i 44 ISB3 'MCiW-’^.NCgvAT' Ml.YN"' ocoorPlanning Coanission r«vie%#«d this application on Jun* €, cofiffiended approval of tha proposed variances based upon g findings: lot width variance is required since the 125' lot width % or mote of the 140* requireawnt. lumber of methods can be used in deteraininq the actual iges of hardcover on the property: Based on crediting only the land at the building site, ■ 0-75* hardcover proposed is 2,960 square feet or 15.8% in the 75-250' tone is 3,380 square feet or 30.0%. Based on also crediting the northerly portions of the >perty for the hardcover calculations, 0-75' hardcover la 60 square feet or 10.5% and in the 75-250* tone is 3,380 lare feet or 10.2%. Based on calculating 0-75' and 75-190* from the lagoon y crediting the building site, and with drainage all ected to the lagoon, 0-75' lagoon setback hardcover is 9% (all existing driveway), in the 75-190* lagoon setback 34.4%, and in the lakeshore 0-50* setback is 0%. leant should not be penalized for the existing driveway er in the lagoon 0-75* zone, and in fact his driveway minimizes the additional driveway hardcover required. neighbors* request for the lakeshore setback and average variances to allow for the least disruptive sightlines, ain uniformity, and the capability tc direct all drainage of relatively flat lawn area, justify the granting of a to the lakeshore setback. unique characteristics of the property i.e. the proposed j site separated from the rest of the property by a constitute a valid hardship to the property. variances can be granted without permanent crediting of north of the lagoon. Council in reviewing this parcel finds that the property entirety. Including area north of the lagoon, meets or 1 acre lot area requirements for the LR-IB Zoning Page 2 of 5 WNiirSri E:\TI5SEDjf m>ri»:'r »Ax i FUEiicruCQfsiNCV 4 1S88Li^:NC^Vf m4H.— --------OEPuron June 6, based upon lot width the actual Lding alter (t or 15.8t 0.0%. one of the rdcover is e is 3r380 :he lagoon, linage all rdcover is ion setback I. g driveway I driveway squired. nd average ightlines, 1 drainage ntlng of a e proposed erty by a editing of e property , meets or IB Zoning jM- w 1 -rj! iSS^geSir:;.;; '.i-- m • •’ ’ ' >f.'- ' . .CITY I];•- OFEorqn <>city of OFiOiVC3feANi?sS ENTISIOt£f' ft' mjn’^rr r»x * ?*j&: 'C ^tco^asCITYi ■1:‘- OFORQNO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.COl'SVr MINf*.ocpurr6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recomaendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not smrely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon­ strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COVCLOSIORS, OBDSR KBD COHDITIOIIS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow the construction of a new home located partially within the 0-75* lakeshore setback area where no structures are allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow a total of 2,960 square feet of hardcover or 15.8% in the 0-75* setback zone at the building site, where no hardcover is allowed and to allow 3,380 square feet of hardcover or 30.0% in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone at the building site, rhere only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1, to allow encroachment on the average lakeshore setback from the lagoon (or north) side of the building site, subject to the following conditions: 1. All drainage from the proposed house must be directed toward the lagoon to gain the maximum possible infiltration time and distance. 2. A site grading plan must be submitted for staff approval prior to issuance of ^ building permit. 3. Applicant is placed on notice that future additions of hardcover at the building site will not automatically be approved and would likely be subject to removal of equivalent amounts of existing hardcover. 4. Lowest floor elevation must be 932.5 MSL or higher. Page 3 of 5 r i V mim ?ANS?5J5 EN7ERIDOi Wf'ES.'Y lAX b ?>j5:^Cf:tC3»f03'O'/ 4 V / .-.v! • ■•'••n»V*?;• ’iii-' '• ■ ••• • '■ ■■.. : ^1 kCOUNTY MINN. _____DEPUTY '■_■"■■ w ■ - ■ .: i-.Including the nr reports by ' the proposed Ity. itlng on this lly to other ince would not a fire hazard ly serve as a Tiate a demon~ a substantial ping with the e Plan of the V6r the Orono Code Sections instruction of ack area where ection 10.22r :over or 15.8% hardcover is in the 75-250' hardcover is division 1, to he lagoon (or ndltions: ted toward the d distance. roval prior to s of hardcover ired and would i of existing CIWOFORONO City of ORONORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2462 tliinPCxty clerk 6L7 PropertyOwn^i^s) 5. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not with the applicants# but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval# or this variance will expire on that date (June 27* 1988). 8. Violation of or non-compIxance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code# shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein# and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant have read# understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself# his heirs# successors and assigns# hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. the Orono City Council on this 27th day of June# 1988. James R.Grabek#/Mayor / Edward J. Callaluafn, Jr., Acting Mayor TRANSFt.^ ENTERfD 0£n or PROrtsrr tw t pvsu>. reccros NO^ 4 m INN. deputy Page 4 of 5 roperty not cercised by be date of gi (June 21/ terms and ion of the by granted :eby agrees his heirsr ig of this June# 1988. HD RECORDS IN lEPUTY r j*^ •• •■: ^ T-' •..•'• . .^•' • ■ . iMi iipi wmm •:.• ■•= :'r\- ■; ■■■; /■ ■ C .■••■'•■••: V' - - -r r-. 'L •':• • • f r- r.t ! ■’■J M:... 4*:-4^ .-ii-l .i.-.CITYOFQRQ^i City of ORONORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 246 2STATE OP MINNESOTA )) SS eCOUNTY OP HENNEPIN )^TSANSFSa SNTcRSDPt*r. Iff fKnMi :u a r’caucsEcoRos« 1968KOUJJHF MINN0E3*UTV tiV~> Vet 7nrea.''“‘ "• MMlYSLBRVMir NOTMV nflUC-4NmNE30T« HCNNIPMCCUNTr ■y COBfflBSiOn Expir»", iu«i» ■•I NOTARY PUBLIC?’ ------------~^ G-^-96 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES' STATE OP MINNESOTA ) } ss • COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this •KWm L BRYANT fir nfflUC-MINNESOTA NOMEPW COUNTY tipm JtimB IY^6 I NOTARY PUBLIC --- MY COMMISSION' EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 ty V—'. •*•':*•. , . • '• ■•■•••■•■’ *■'' • ■■ * oi\oCOUNCILTHANSFES c H7£REO0£®r OF PRCPi:uY tax public ??tCOiTOS -----— 198^ :ounty, personally known to me to be sd the foregoing scuted the same as f t 198_^ before me rsonally appeared 3 me to be the egoinginstrument, :he same as his STATE OF HINIESOTA ))COUNTT OP HENMEPIM })CITT OF OROMO ) I Sarotbf H. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono. Henniplm County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have ooapared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Counoil of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a nesting of said City Council held on June 2 7 , 19 88 , and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 28thL _ _. ■■ A iwi:; / •• . V- ■>:1= y-- ;■ y- -vi' is \' :• "• r* •■ • \■ . •••=A QIMayor Grabek s Orono Council Menbara Planning Cn—laalon Chairman Kallay Orono Planning Coomlaslon Membera City Administrator BamhardsonJeanna A. Mabusth* Building & Zoning Administrator August 30, 1989#1451 Gaorga f> Tharesa Bloon • 1374 Rest Point Road Variances - Piblic Hearing Sdning Districts - RR-lb total area 28,850 s.f. Partinaat Ordiaanca - Saction 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover 75-250^ area allowed ■ 4,700 s.f. or 25% existing » 5,247 s.f.* or 27.911 proposed ■ 5,967 s.f. or 31.741 increase of 720 s.f. of hardcover • 0-75* hardcover • 1,094 s.f or 10.8% Total existing hardcover on the property approximately 38.71 is at Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) • Street setback required » 35' existing ■ 13' (existing) proposed ■ 33' (northwest corner of proposed garage. Majority of tne north side of the garage meets the required 35* setback) Side yard setback required -10' proposed » 5'3" variance ■ 4'9" or 49% List Of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D -> Applicant's Addendum Exhibit E - Hardcover Pact Sheets Exhibit P - Elevations, Ploor Plan, Poundatlon Plan Exhibit G - Cross Section Exhibit H - Survey Review of Application ■* The applicants seek hardcover, side and street setback variances for a proposed garage addition 30 x 24' that will be attached to the prinicpal structure via a skyway. The skyway design is proposed to save a grouping of mature trees one hundred years of age. The application was originally submitted with a 10' ■*> side variance but applicant was again advised in order to /• •• " i Li'. » I -i:- .V ■■■•^ 1 P ■■i m Zoning Fll« #1451 August 30, 1989 Page 2 of 3save trees that the garage structure should be aoved further east at ainlaua of 5'. As pertinent ordinance section/facts noted above state the majority of the north side of the garage meetsK setback. As applicant's addendum notes, ^xniDit D, the house currently has no garage or storage basement. The proposed garage will be of 3 levels with a basement for storage, a grade level garage, and a master bedroom suite on the third floor (review Exhibit G). Discnsslaa of Bardahipa A Pindiiige - Addendum (Exhibit D) notes the followings 1. There is no garage to serve the existing residence and there is no basement under the existing residence to provide additional storage area. Applicant currently rents a garage across the street for storage of vehicles and equipment Garage is to be reoioved next spring. 2* The existing street Rest Point Road does not permit any parking. The existing parking area is needed to serve a -visting- family of six children + elderly grandparents. 3. Applicant claims that the majority of the hardcover has been on the property for many years and includes sidewalks, steps, and a retaining wall that extends into the 0-75’ area. Additional Coenents - Staff supports applicant's request for a garage finding the setback variances requested to have little impact on the adjacent properties. In fact it is staff’s understanding that the neighbor to the immediate east will submit a letter in writing supporting applicants request as he too appears to be concerned that this special grouping of trees be saved. « concern in this review is that applicant seeks approval of additional hardcover of 720 s.f. or 3.8% in the 75-250' setback zone. (Total hardcover on site is at 38.7%) In order to be consistent with recommendations made by the Planning Co^ission with similar, previous reviews, the removal of existing hardcover is demanded. Noting that a third of the area of this property is located in 0-75’ setback area. Planning commission may allow up to 29% or 30% hardcover in the 75-250’ zone. A majority of runoff from the excessive hardcover area - -^rth of the property to the lake through the issed yard. Applicant may be asked to consider e pathway that runs along the east side of the -O the concrete steps, although it is not e City to tell the applicant what improvements ■V V :V'> ^ _ _•• i . . L*: ^ , ■!#•• - .SLd be moved further east ce section/facts noted Lde of the garage meets rant's addendum notes# age or storage basement, s with a basement for ;er bedroom suite on the ring: existing residence and ng residence to provide urrently rents a garage ahicles and equipment. >ad does not permit any rking area is needed to children + elc'erly ty of the hardcover has ind includes sidewalks, extends into the 0-75' *r a garage finding the impact on the adjacent iderstanding that the it a letter in writing ppears to be concerned ved. plicant seeks approval 3.8% in the 75-250' I at 38.7%) In order to ade by the Planning 'iews, the removal of at a third of the area :back area. Planning •dcover in the 75-250' Bssive hardcover area the lake through the y be asked to consider g the east side of the although it is not cant what improvements Zoning Pile 11451August 30, 1989Page 3 of 3Optlcms of ActionSection 10.08, Subdivision for the necessary findinas.2. Approval. If approved your recommendation should contain one or mozm of the following findings and hardships noted by applicant and staff. Refer to applicant's addendum and the Collotfing noted by staff: 1. The property is served by municipal sever. 2. One third of the total area of this property is located within the 0-75' setback area. 3. The existing drainage pattern of the property provides for positive drainage to the lake over extensive grassed yard. Options of Action - a. Allow no additional increase in hardcover limiting hardcover at *7.9 in 75-250' setback area - or total hardcover at 38.7% (would encourge rmovals in 0-75' setback area) b. Limit hardcover in 75-250' setback area to 29% or 301 increase of 1.1% or 2.1% this would require removals of existing hardcover in 75-250' zone only. = N a lif.v '.vr-.-.'-wr-i* ' ’i. er to Hould noted d the ty is perty over iting :otal ttback r 30% Is of M ^4m^m ■1'^ V. V ■ • .:< ■■ : ■ ' ; ■: <V 1- ,,'1 /•. ’ ■ •• • H i'. J-1 i- CITI OF CmOBO - TOIAJICB APPLICATIOB ^Initial Application Pee $150.00($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Pee $75.00(no change fro* original application)» 1 Mter-the-Pact Pees (Double application*fW)#1451PmPBRTT LCXJkTiaiSite Address p,sir,»-. Property Identification Number (P.I.O.) Please checJc one - Property _ _ abstract or lnclud.d on applicaht Name Geory)^ OWHER (if different than applicant) Nane Phone (hc«M) 472-3936 _ _ Phone (work)"■ '3 7 < ) 100 Phone (work) Address:City: Date Property Acquired _ _ _adjacent parcels of land. JPSSSEHT OSB OF PBOPBSTT ————— Present Zoning District Present Use of Property sinai«> DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Other (specify) Estimated Construction Cost $j2fljtaOKa bedroom Describe request in detail: u attached to ^ho hrisamnnt- and ?nd f, ----------------------------------------- - _____________ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback Variances ( x Other Lot Width Front Hardcover Side Rear) BARDS ™°^De*crib« undue hardship or practical difficulty rasultin^ fr<* itrict enforcement of soning reoulationai rr.v.„tin, c-plUnc. «lth lontn, C^e Requir«a«nt!»; See attarhgd letter —.... —jRBQOIBBD SUBMlfnO.82. C«?U^lS Li.t of c«.r. .ithin I”’this list fro« Bannapin County Dapartisant of Pinanca B-«03 Govt Cantar 3 StlilldV'legal sited envelopes (#10) pra-addrassed to each of the naaes on tha above list with no return address (use address labels 4. Certificate^of *^Tr*va^ hardcover calculations as raquir^. 5*. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any c anga i in existing grade are proposed. 4, Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). „„.rate list of 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by __________________ The Aoolicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please ?cur v.?ianc. .ppUcatlon 1. not cc.pl.t. if th. .bote information has not been included. __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—- CertIfIcatIon"by~Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official’s Signature_ _ _ _,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ?Si“a^Ican\®*fI^by agree, to provide all information reauested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all tiZl unusual expense, incurred in review of this ^ '"®*'of^ hV.,^^^the information supplied is true and correct to the best of nis/ner )cnow ledge. ^ Applicant'. Signatut. /?. /■L^- - - - - - - - - Dat« .,T..1y 77, ,iata- - u SS!^nVr°hl^v acko-l.dg.a and age... to thi. application and onto th. property by City age.nts. Commission members, and Council members for purpose tion and verification of this req^st. Owner's Signature .. _ _ _ __ _- ippUcIn7mus7hl7e‘7lY'^^^ into the City days before the PlLning Commission Meeting. third Monday of each month. Applicants must ia review meetings of the Planning Coiraission and Council. If an appiica^^ ^ unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)te .. , zoning authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buildi g Office of this change prior to the meeting. T-9 *• KBI .i- ’* •**•. • •••' • • y. .••• :• - /..I WM %7/U/nftATCH #01mm mm 0M«fi mmtAXOAYflllOM/AMI la 07-H7 01S4I Ri i M SIOATQ RALRM 1 CG ISAi R€$T HOUND HN p$m mm (QNNIR HAMI tAMOAYIR IMM/A0OR 10 07-117 015AA RL LAMRfNCi 1 LANRfNCf f IS44 Rfsr HOUND m mm Aooi iONNiR mm lAXPAYfR NAHE/AOOR so 07-117 01100 Rf N A V ARAK NALTfR f 1 1100 RfST HOUND HN Aooii mm TAXPAYfR NAMC/ADOR TOTAL BATC ■*rom strictfith Zoningmst obtain lovt Centerach of the SS8 labelsequired. iny changeste list of1. Pleasethe above complete equired or ees and/or tifles that of his/her 2Xr- laaa. ind further onsuitants, investiga- 1 qnq fore the 3 on the heduled leant is have an i Zoning m •f' mt..:• •' ' ■M ■* <• \ - .»r ■■ ' < J ■-ft ■ ** ‘ fei ■* * mm HHHW N* 'i V y-. ry-I ■■■ w- ■ ^ ^ ’-■■ ■., ■■■'. :v' . '■■*■■' :.: "s\h ■^•-;:=isi-'■;Ml SftTf 97/ZB/W9 iiTCl Mi MiiM^iii coumrU 97-ll7-t% IZ MM 6IS4I MST PQtm m • m SlMfOOS fT4L KAIM t COM SlGAfOW i}4i MST MUff tAMmjtm m sssmnm itmONNil MICTAMAYlffMAfC/AMO SO 07>117-ts SZ 0000 OlUO MST OOIflT m lANOCICf E 4 MUM usNsmm lAMOEICf f i MIEN LANGMAN9 iS04 MST OOiNT M tSKM m SiSMMOO MM ONNEi MMTAXOAYEBMM/AOOO SO 07'U7-tS SS 0007 OiSOO MST OOINT m N i y %MMM Jtt NAiTii r A VAUGNN 0 KJIAIli iSOO MST OOINT 00 HOUND m iSSOA MOO AMO CStCI NAHC TAXPAyiO NAM/AOOfl wm OATCS Ml C' r G [OTY ffCOONATION SVSTfN QM€BS USTSO 07>117-fS ft 00S7 OUTS MST OOINT 00 H 0 I L & MMICHCI HlCMAEl 0 i lYNM MMICMl 1$7S MST MUMT 0000 HOUMO m ftSIOO SO 07>ll7>21 St fOSO 01S7S MST OOINT 00% i amnstm t a o emicoSIM ANMOSON II7S MST OOINT 00HOUND HN S0S4410 07-117-tI It 000101171 MST OOINT 00OQOilIT TMAM IT IL____MNMTM M i MNEE C EOOEOf 1171 MST OOINT 00 MOUND MN SSI44 SO 07>ll7'tl 11 01 01S04 MST OOUIT TEMY C Smm ETAL TEiOY C SMTO 1104 MST OOINT 00 HOUND m SiS44SO 07>117<ts SS 0011 01S8S MST OOINT M SU7ANNE 0 ASriH lOUtANNl AUSTIN jtll OMMOOO 00 NOMINS MN &SS4S SO 07-117<tS SS 0012 01S74 MST OOINT 00»0 0 OLOQN ETA OLOQM MOME 0 A TMMSA A 0L0» 1174 MST OOINT 00 HOUND HN SA144 3S 07-117.23 32 0062 R J & M A UETT RICHARD J A HARJORIE A WETT 5515 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436 # 14:5 1 CEOnrY THAT THE fACTS OtPOESENTED AM AN ACCURATf AND TOUE MORESCNTATION CNF 1HF00HAT1QI4 AS IT AOOEAOS THIS DATE ON THE OECOR03 Of THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPAOTMENT Of OOOOEPTY TAXATION* TO THE OEST Of m KNQHLEOGE AND OELUf. OATI »V ^ i\ -I c, . ■'ii. e / • '■ • •: i;. k r »atiwM.sua'o « POINT PAN*,**t)*e ^ 736^ 6 •7'.. Lc t. $1451liyrtinq A»lmin!«lril'jr Cif*j of Orofw PC Box 66Cnj5t.5l ^ 55323LPe: Zoning vonancf 1374 Rest Point Road,»rrrr;." “ to construct o garage on severe'y damage or destroy a unique clumpn:; - ~ —'■< v#H'iances: SETEa CK FROfI THE RO a D_-Th. rrr: csr t: I's^. s.nmcs.. .of, than the proposed site, .r 1 .in «H»ars Old and each was planted to Ths group 01 (amllu that construcleo tho cipprato Thai home has boon added to over the :;:;:rdTheTors"uhe ;rU0. uees would represent a s.gmticant historical and economic loss. setback from side - For the .hove reasons we also request a variance to the north side of the propertg of 5 feet. V. ;;v.Sr.:^ •• permanent residence this year. A ■!" ■' > • ■4^^' ''J:'--:'"-..2 ir 8 re'^uesl for 8 variance ;s. In order lo gel the or destroy a unique clump or Uie following road lo the proposed he proposed garage b^ick from the street significantly more was planted to onstructed the een added to over the present a significant also request a »et. we presently exceed ardcover calculation) rcentage as shown. jrage because the nent. We have not 11 be making this our TW orogosrt gorw will sliminate lh« lor oulsiiK **would includ* Msomont sooce ono«- Uw rail an wistimj garage across the road from out home for sli^ege. iwwwr due w its dilaoidated condition isse pnotosi the owner of that garige will De removing It in the spnng/summer next gear.The existing parting area is Placktopped and ^li^for our visiting familg and friends we nave six children ana elderlg parents who visit on e frequent Pasis and tnis parting area permits us r^le Off-Street parting The existing street is a verg narrow road afMj does not permit any on-street p^ing Much of the existing hardcover has been on the property for mwiy I^s uncluding th. sidewalk, steps and retaining walls which extend into the 0-75 feet zone) We have looked at all of the existing hardcover to determine whether we could remove some; howevei .any that might be removed would be insignificant in percen age would create parking problems (parking area). If we can provide any additional information please advise. Very truly yours, fl- ij2? Gf-orae'R Bloom •V * . . • V lOUa. heresa A. Bloom to'9Jusny . :*'•:. . .jik^-Sk V:tlANCKTOVi.H CALCUI-ATION WOHKSIIKt:T ftC9ii'*y\r-\ . •■■■V-^--jf: -;-:;v^,*--.'x.-..: -,. - :r :■ :.\0i *£ •• ••^,m:^W-^ ■ j •• -■/ : V': .■ .• /V— / //^r ^ 0 * t* ik>use ^K /0.1 3ol S.f .length widib7/. 3 K €m /Of 7 *.f .22.6T K 5. ^./17 9 . f ./r-5 K H. S ■k 7V B.f .X A*8 . f .caraa* ---- ..X •S.f .Driveway 3^C X ?/./// €B.f.X m a B.f.fttdavalk ------M m /7/S B.f.a m B.f.X .& . f .liatio/X m 9^0 S.f .Deck X m fi ^S.f . f c k i.£ndscape X a t^o S.f. areas f underlain X -■K s? S.f. by plastic shcctine X s.f. />fr. X «i /€ C s.f. other -5 y X r 3 • i 6 / 3 s.f. • : • < > 7 X €.C m 96 o.f • X ?m s.f. N^^STIo G UAnDCOVLH IN zone m S^^/7 s.f. r.iUtif>9 lt«r«c«v?r « - Total g»I«ttw<i Hj<rdco»*r ■ IMLot Area wlthia Zooe. - ■- --------itL- , 100 - 27. «/ i 0 0 s .f .MMitio^al Hardcover to be added In t&n^i11 rmtni St 1 fig Ba recover to be Aefftoved, If any:11 rr:i ;/ ,• ••: :.••■ .•■ ;• . ■.■>■:■ - ;;^ .• •• y TOTAL S.F. T< Final Hardcover Proposalt (l.ino (IJ 4 Lina (2) -Lin® (3)| - > ♦ 7ZO - O rxistin9 To be /id<3c<l To bo removed Final Pi'C'f>o5cd Hardcover I ■» / r-IIARDCOVLH CAIx:m.ATI(W WDBT^SiirKT (sf&f^CC Bloomsetback lone: IcIrcU «ficl(o^7Ty 7S-2iO rwtn»tn<| Hardcover in 2onn______ a »2S0-500 500^1 OOO*imu5«length vidthX m•X «••XX a*h. Garaqe X mOrivewar _XX •/i. sidewalk • X mXtm 9S7•Xa- Patio/X m V/oDeck X m f\ landscape X ■ areas underlain X by plastic sheeting ___X a X m • • f. Other X ? oo *1^ ‘ /fPA fA'X / m V7 s.f .s .f . a.f . [STI?:C HARDCOVER IK ZOKE » /(P^V a.f. (1) aciv--" #1451Hardcover I . r.i,tio<, Hardcover ■ t«|tot Area wiiAin zofie- -r.f.■ 100 - /o. S'^ tf^t&SO s.f.Additional H.irtlcovcr to i.< added |w ron^,« Width • TOTAt i.c.s.f. s.f.I tern T0TA,l. s.r. TO BC AOOCO 0 f}|CaUtlnq Hardcover to t.g Bcao ved. If any:l.nnoth a Width . TOTAt B.f. TOIAL S.r. TO BE REMOVED Final Har dcover Prot>oral : ItlBc (1) 4 Lino (2) -Lino (3)} « I ^g?y * f? . o r«i-t< — ---------------------- - I - «.f. (<Jcxl..tin9 To bo Added To bo Romovod rinal Proposed Kardcover \ bina (<) K 100 > . *-f. Loi /r\c>y^s.f . X 100 * er^tL. •_ . Aa i i. > '# . T “0 'k-B«P fcDhj ,. • 'f 'r.-f• 'v*l • f 4 •*..** s* ^ « /a*..* * V' • e • •• • • ‘ • • mm •* •%••V • • T ' *VV**rV ^ #• kM •5T| - '^1451^ f’xist inq If/irdcover x 100 Lot Area within Zone100o added In zone:h X Width m TOTAL &.f.H o •S.f.X a a.f.X a •s.f. ___ X c*s.f. . TO fJC ADDED o (21 JC Removed^ Jf any: \__ X Width a TOTAL s.f. ___ X a s.f. _ X a s.f. ,.,^ X n s.f. X a • s.f. TO DE REMOVED c (3) 1*# inc (3)J » O I o /ff9Ys. icd To bo Hemoved Final ) «a ,/^yy s.f.X 100 « .ar i •V ■C...," ';V . ;. :w >. ■^/ 4? i x c.;? :■ .*.' i '*,' f^. . \‘ * •'. -* * [ ■•»*»■ ****T!T*^-n‘*/'*'T’***^. r A.----€0»^. ■f '•-( f4V./*.* • /. .. • • . * ' •. •2 *. 1-.Uf.lt •t* * • • '' »*6' Ui§ i •. , ;;-^3a/>u?iN4,- cza^ ~. ■»fe*--c». . k. t. • * . ^ ^ 1 . ■n • «.isupar< Tv I * * T .. ,, pW(oklwt4 .M'«.<, .f •--*^^■^7^tk^v, '■.^y*•> •: .;»>7.v ■ '■ •••.'.• '> •.■ • . . •• :^ • •• . • ^ Vr. ; ili. ";:;.v;- - • •.’^ ;' ,4n.t' <r t PUinrraG comassKM meeting HBDNBSmX, SBPTBBBR 6, 1919 7l00 P.M. U75 nOMH BOKD SOOIB - OnWCTT. CBMBNNS CODNCIX. REPEBSENTETIVB - ATTBmftMCE PDBLIC BEARINGS 1. S:00 p.n. <1411 Sussex Square Developnent, SN20 Pox St.- Prelininery Subdivision - Continuation of Public Bearing ACTION ITEMS Review of these itens will conusance between scheduled public hearings. Please note meeting begins at 7i00 p.e. Don Copley, lies Tonkawa Road - Variance - Public Bearing John Skoglund, 1840 Pox Street - Variance Public Bearing Gregory Peterson, 1355 Arbor Street - Conditional Use Pennlt/Variance - Public Bearing Jack Yost, 1515 Green Trees Road - Conditional Use Pemit/Varlance - Public Rearing Lakeview Golf Course, 710 North Shore Drive Nest - Conditional Use Pemit - Public Bearing Michael Pirich, 2224 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Bearing Ward Edwards, 2l|74 Camuin Street - Renewal Variance - Public Bearing George ( Theresa Bloom, 1374 Rest Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing ADDITIONAL ITEMS 10. Approval of Planning Coasalssion Minutes of August 21, 1989 11. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the September 25, 1989 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT #1411 SUSSEX SQUARE DEVELOPMENT IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 4-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA i ScaN OoM I incN -lOOIatf S-6-8S,-^ ilis.va*li29 EjMling oonlour,— EiittingtlMlkin am That part of lot 32. AUDITOR'S SUBDfVlSIOII HUNDER 230.That part of lot 32. dotcribed as foilevs Co«a«nclng at the NoNortheast corner of Lot 32.the No Subdivision No. 230. Hennepin County. P the North line of said lot 32, 297 feet;Mest Hennepin County. Minnesota; thence t; thence South to a point in the South line of said Lot 32. 153 feet West cf the southwest corner of tot 33 in said Audi­ tor's Subdivision Number 230, thence East along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Lot 33; thence North along the West line of said Lot 33 to the Northwest corner of said lot 33; thence East along the North line of said Lot 33 to the Northeast corner of said Lot 33; thence North the Cast line of said Lot 32 to the point of beginning. s follows: the North line of tot 32. Hennepin County. Minnesota Commencing at a pom Auditor's Subdivision Numbe . 297 feet west of the Northeast said North Itne to a point 1 of the Sout said Auditor's Subdivision Number 230 Hem distance the South line of est corner of LotId Lot 32. 450 feet west Sion Number 230 Hennepin County Minnesota; thence East on said South line of said Lot 32. 297 feet; thence North to the point of beginning. Lot 31. That part of Lot 32. described a point on the North line of sa the Northeast corner thereof; thence west on said North line to the Northwest corner of said lot 32. thence South on the West line of said Lot to the Southwest corner of said Lot; thence East on the South line of said lot to a point in said South line 450 feet West of the Southwest corner of Lot 33.in said Auditor's Subdivision Number 230, Hennepin County. Minnesota; thence North to the point of beginning, except the South 251 feet of the East 200 feet thereof, the Southwest corner of Lot 32 being marked by judicial landmark. Auditor's Subdivision Number 230, Hennepin County. Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the register of Deeds in and for said County. I hereby ceril under my dlrec» ......w. — —. . — - —. Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of State of Minnesota. CUrriN t QR0NBER6, INC. Marii S. Gronterg N. Lie. No. 12755 CX)FFIN a GRONBERG. INC. ENGINEERS. LAND SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA . ....................................................................................... . V- '•:r:\"t---*"r^:‘•":.^';,.v:;-.fV •-•.•s.r/.: •• ■ •■• /. - f • ‘ ; C ounty ' »-7 n \ " {* R oad UJ I NA 6ER i-K.sconunc Oi wveiLMHUa REGULATIONS OnONO ORDINANCE PROHIBITS EXCAVATION. FILLING. GRAOMB, DREDGING. TREE REMOVAL OR CONSTRUCTION OF ANY KINO WITHIN 75 FT OF ANY SHORaiF^ WITHIN as FT OF ANY WETLANDS PERMITS ARE REOUIRIO FOR DOCKS. SEAWALLS. RIPRAP ixees Road CITY OF ORONO BUILDING PnMIT^PLAN REVIEW IN4PCCTOII. .DING mMIT^RL O.TC HO--------------- n AI>l«IIOVEO AS SUMITTEO Jr APPROVED WITH CWWECnOWS AS NOTED n NOT APPROVED - CORRECT * RESUOMIT Th»» comnwnH «• Hf »•» iti III* cawirll«ne» A 'liilmTmin InetiHIn* IHmf !■* w»ertleaH "•••• H IWl '«<*••• KPFP THIS PLAN SET ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. SnEGOPY •I ■•• rli*'. th.li thl- ! •■ .1 tru'' .mil corr.-cr It it >f .1 -urv.'v f>f th* Siiiin.l.ir I.* rtf: I. ft I..cl I. RAEEN TREE', ^111 .if tti.' I'lnrlon of .ill hiillJInq^. theroon. ml ill .-I- ihl - ‘■ncrn.ichrh'til '.. If jnv . frm nr >i ti l I in I. A’l 'iirv.'V'rf I’v •m Ihl'. Hth il.i / I ’l .r-'i. IlftP. rhi I••I|1| i|.*'.criot Ion ..ill! I.r v.iHd upon ttm 'iltm: t>r !>•' i'l-it. r.REEM TREES. I..vvl Str.-'v 'linn. Rcq. No. 3''3I I - ‘ .i.«5 -----iss™u«r ^.ta-0n I ■^^|■fMcCOMBS•KNUTSON ASSOCIATES. INC rw IMRMA. G<IAI It| • MMI m'm rmnrkrnnn mm trtMRvw* unWNfRr'A I*** 40’ ’‘IS. 5^/0 PREPARED FOR m*. #1446 ini«Tk%w% tkmmM {iioyMogc-sj yaDlJfi® ■^^Aafc«asnlcn>u«E» riMNimsnwL'inuvAWi.fHt. nRaKiDSMik. tIMAjpr CCM^VtUOi'a auvs > >iWWt»kjLL . •• MtMft ITL'lfMlttbWMbWSliPVIMMTIOUKair . RlWOtlL'T W»iM^ . f*SC» -Sto^IWuOPKV^kJT rjt ^1 H I|i , . !i §ii ?fs !sf m □ III li * ES gi 3 5D