Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-20-1993 Planning PacketCMINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 20, 1993 ROLL TheOrono Planning Commission met on the above dale with the following members present: Chair Charles Schroeder, Candace Rowlelle, (.'harles Nolan Jr., Sandra Smith, Stephen Peterson, Janice Berg, Dale Lindquist. The following represented the City Staff: Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, and Recorder Marva Hurst. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) #1862 THREE STAR TRUCKING 2590 WATERTOWN ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING The subdivision was reviewed as a sketch plan review at the July Planning Commission meeting. Theapplication involves a proposal within a rural residential district requiring on-site septic testing and the assurance that there is two acres of dry buildable contiguous land within each of the lots. Each lot, with the exception of lot 8, is proposed at the minimum two acre dry contiguous with lot 4 having a .55 acre retention pond. Applicant* alternate plan shows an extension to the west through the Halson ’s property. Applicant's surveyor has shown a dashed line, where the 50 foot extension corridor would be located. Also, with the designation of the road , lot 7\s lot line is moved further east to assure enough dry contiguous. Mabusth noted the updated report from the engineer which should be reviewed during discussion ofgradingand drainage issues because there ares;.!vci al unanswered issues regarding the size of the retention pond in lot 4. Primary concern is that if the pond had to be increased in size, where would the additional dry buildable area come from? The only available additional dry buildable would come from lot 8. Mr. Dunwreath Peasley, 95 Hackberry Hill, asked for clarification of lot locations and raised concerns about draining to east lot line. Chairman Schroeder read aloud the letter from the engineering firm Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, dated Sept. 12, 1993. Schroeder asked Mabusth to clarify meaning of this letter, Mabusth explained that she is not able to get an accurate sizing of the pond and that Mark Gronberg would have comments and information to share regarding this issue. Gronberg explained his conversation with Shawn Gustafson of Bonestroo et al. They reviewed 'he numbers and the possible classifications for woods and pasture: good, fair, and poor. Gusta fson had cla.ssified both wood and pasture as fair but after review he was comfortable with the numbers. They a. o determined that berm was actually higher than the high water mark of retention pond l IvOiC will have to be some type of erosion control at the outlet of the drainage structure. The swale running along the back of lots 1 through 4 will carry the water into a holding pond instead of onto the lots on Hackberry Hill. Mabusth clarified for Peaseley how the swale would alleviate the problem of w ater drainage into those lots. Gronberg suggested that it's possible that the pond could be low ered to accommodate the need for a larger capacity holding pond. Schroeder asked how we would determine how that the creation of the subdivision and the berms, swale, pond is not going to make the Hackberry Hill residents worse off. Mabusth responded that the development guidelines and standards of the MCWD will assume that the condition is improved. Your current plan shows all runoff from property being directed along east lot to retention pond in northeast. Drainage from retention pond cannot be released at a greater velocity in a totally developed state than it does in an undeveloped state. All runoff from this site will be directed to northeast retention pond, and will no longer exit via Hackberry Hill. Peaseley continued to express his concerns about the dra'.nage issues and that he feels that the propos^ development may not solve the problem. Gronberg feels that the swale, berm and holding pond will alleviate the problem. Schroeder inquired about the sizing of the culvert. Gronberg explained that it will actually be a weir (?) or trench with sloped sides and will be built of concrete or brick. Peaseley asked about the trees on the Suess property. Gronberg explained that the trees will stay and the fact that the drainage easement is wider than normal. Peaseley suggested that the mound septic system may not be elTective in clay and suggests hooking up to sewer and holding tankls. Peterson asked the applicant what Halson has decided to do. Applicant responded that he understood Halson wasn't interested in joining in at this time. Hal.son stated that his main concern was where the road would be placed if an extension is requested. And that he w ould join in just to place the road but not create the lots since wTong placement of the road cf'uld ruin one of his lots. Mabusth reviewed placement of the road, including describing some history of other similar roads in subdivisions such as Meyer Dairy and Golden Vlc’v. She reviewed the need for the City to address the issue of an extension road. Mabusth noted staff is recommending an extension to the west, and asked Planning Commission whether this property should be included lor further connection to an integrated road system for the area. Rob Seuss, Jr., will be purchasing the original homestead (lot 8) and feels that the creation of this road would pose a safely concern for the children who reside on this road and Golden View as drivers may u.se it as short cut. Smith asked Seuss how he feels about selling aside the outlot realizing that the road may never actually be built. Seuss feels that road should never be built and would not like to see outlot set aside for future use. Chair asked Mabuslh to clarify the theory behind creating this integrated road system. Mabuslh explained that it's an ability to allow people to u.se secondary roads, releasing the burden on main roads, dealing with future subdivisions, integrating neighborhoods. Connecting roads also provides other options of access to and from properties in case of an emergency, where one section of road may be closed. Chair asked Mabuslh to address the issue of setting aside rights of way. Mabuslh explained that the City has done this in other areas, i.e. Rolling Meadows and that the City doesn't ask to develop these roads but to reserve the right to do so in the future if need be. Smith clarified further why the City wants the option to plan for road as they may be needed in the future to alleviate iraffic problems. Resident Jim Huseby, 125 Golden View slated that there are 17 children residing on Golden View not including Seuss' children and that the residents live there becau.se they don't want to live on a busy road like Watertown. He feels that even though the City doesn't intend to open the road, the fact that the City is planning for a future road is nearly the same as opening it. Resident Mike Hilbelink, 85 Golden View feels ihat the proposal to open a road doesn’t make sen.se and that there doesn’t seem to be a need for it. He also felt that the Commission should represent the residents preference not to create the road. Mabuslh reviewed the proposed road locations. Rowlette a.sked how planning for the road would affect Hahson's properly and wiiere would it be placed. Mabuslh reviewed the options suggested by Halson’s attorney. Gronberg explained where the road w ould be placed and suggested that another option would be to place the road between lots 5 and 6 diagonally on the lot line. Peterson asked if a road is created between lots 6 and 7, would there be enough room for a house on lot 7. Gronberg responded that if the septic was moved further up the hill, there would be room. Rowlette asked if the pond between lots 7 and 8 is serving as a holding pond. Gronberg responded that it’s not contributing much as a holding pond because there is no berm and it would have to be modified. Rowlette asked if removal of that pond would increase drainage problems. Gronberg replied that it is not < urrently helping much as a holding pond. Resident Mike Hilbelink - is a Realtor fell that creation of the proposed road would lessen the value of properties and that the area has full access now and the road is not needed. Another resident felt that the proposed road would ruin 3 lots, 6 through 8. Schroeder asked if the road makes .sense for the City over the long term and whether there are any safely concerns. Schroeder fell he can see the need for similar connections in other subdivisions but doesn ’t see it as much in this subdivision. Mabuslh responded that the cul-de-sac is designed to handle emergency vehicles. Lindquist felt that the propo.sed road creates a hardship on lots 7 and 8. Rowlette felt the creation of the road would make it a seven lot subdivi.sion Mabusth asked if the road is needed -- is it part of the planning for an integrated road system. Rowlette asked what might happen to Wateriow n .>hcala Highway 12 beon ihesouth corridor. Would Watertown carr> a lot more traffic and that maybe this proposed road would make more sense. Mike Hilbelink responds that’s why this read doesn ’t make.sen.se. Cited fact that Minnetonka opened some cul-de-sacs and now' the residents w ant to reverse those actions for safety reasons. Resident a.sked whether Hal.^on would have to go through subdivi.sion procedure/expense. Mabuslh explained that he doesn ’t have to subdivide now' but needs to be part of the planning and decision process. There w'as some discussion about septic issues and further testing and how the possibility of the need to increase the size of the holding pond would alTect a decision now. It was moved by Rowlette. .seconded by Lindquist to recommend approval of #1862 for Three Star Trucking, 2590 Watertown Road, for the Preliminary Subdivision as show n w ithout the oullot a.ssuming that iseslabli.shed that the berm will handle all the runolTand keep the runolT away from Hackberry Hill and will improve the .situation, that the holding pond is adequate and if not it would be a 7 lot subdivision, that the septic testing on lot 3 is completed and that we have two alternate sites, that lot 8 has a secondary test site, and approval is also subject to resolution of all issues A-H as listed in the packet. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 2. Smith felt there is enough uncertainty about road needs in the future, Nolan added that the right of way could have been given up in the future. (#2) #1869 SIDNEY AND BARBARA REBERS, 2080 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - VACATION OF EASEMENT/CREATION OF NEW EASEMENT - PUBLIC HEARING Bob Kast with BRW was present representing Mr. and Mrs. Rebers. Mabusth explained that the change in the placement of the sewer line w as made in an attempt to save mature trees and get as close to Brown Road as possible w hile minimizing the impact on the outlet, and that the Commission is now asked to vacate the old easement and create a new easement. She also noted the engineers report asked that there w'ould be 7.5 feet on either side of the sewer line. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Smith to recommend approval of application #1869 for Sidney and Barbara Rebers, 2080 Wayzata Boulevard, as listed which is creating the new easement and vacating the old easement with the conditions so stated. Vote; Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#3) #1872 ORONO WOODLAND, INC. - PAUL PHILLIPS, 2100/2140 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS - PUBLIC HEARING Paul Phillips was present. The Subdivision of a lot line rearrangement shall be completed as a plat realizing the cumbersomeness of the legal descriptions that would be created by metes and bounds format and so it was agreed upon by all that the plat would be done. One of the steps involved in the plat is the vacation of drainage and utility easements. The shared lot lines will be redefined and the easements will be rededicated in the final plat It was moved by Smith, seconded by Nolan to recommend approval of application #i872 as proposed. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#4) #1850 JAMES SPINNER, 940 NORTH ARM DRIVE - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Applicants contractor w'as present. Mabusth explained that the application had been tabled at the August meeting so that an updated survey and hardcover inventory could be provided. In return, applicant w as to review the new facts and to present plan for hardcover reductions. Existing structure is w ithin the 0- 75 ’ as well as much of the paved driveway and parking area. There are changed hardcover calculations dealing with lakeshore setback for the new structure, garage stall will be located in the 0-75’. There will be more permanent structure hardcover within the 0-75’. Hardcover in the 0-75' exists at 24.29^0 and is now proposed at 17.8%. This reduction is in landscape areas that were installed prior to Spinner purchasing the property. Applicant is ofreritig to remove plastic in land.scaping areas. Rowlette stated that the reduction in hardcover is accepting structural for non-structural. Nolan asked if the calculations as now stated include the plastic. Schroeder asked if the applicant had any comments. Contractor stated that applicant is also going to remove some of the .sidewalk on the west side of the garage (96 s.f.). Removing concrete on the east side would cause a drainage problem, cau.sing erosion problems that would cau.se the garage footing to be above frost line. He reviewed the history of the situation. Doesn ’t understand why it’s a problem as the garage addition would be built over the existing concrete drive. Feels that removing the hardcover would erode land and cause the garage to shift. Nolan disagreed stating that he viewed the property and felt there are alternative methods to control erosion such as vegetation. Contractor fell that it would be inconvenient for applicant not to have hardcover and disagrees with Commission ’s view. Nolan explained that Commission would like the resident to conform with current hardcover standards. Schroeder asked whether they had looked at other areas to remove hardcover. Contractor replied that they had. Smith asked if applicant had considered placing the addition on west side near front entry? Contractor said it would not be possible as it would block the entr> way. Kowlelve stalCvi her concern is the e.\ces.sive amount of concrete all around the house. Nolan asked why he <xys the hardcover is for drainage. Conlracior explained it’s because of the slope of the neighbors lot. Rowlette suggest the drainage could be accomplished with a culvert or drainage .swale. Feels home is incredibly overbuilt with excessive amount of hardcover and would like to tiee some hardcover removed and that none of that amount is structural. Nolan asked about the eaves. Contractor explained that they will be cut on the east side, but will remain the same on the south side of garage. Mabusth explained that the eave will ^lill be at about 4 ’ along the south side. West side will also be 4 ’ eave. Schroeder stated that Commission ’s concern is to limit the intensification of hardcover in the 0-75' and that the original drawing indicated that everything w-as outside of the 0-75' and what is now discovered is that a considerable amount is within the 0-75'. Schroeder explained that the Commission requested Spinner to reduce hardcover to the maximum possible and that the feeling is that it hasn ’t been accomplished. Lindquist stated that he would like to see the garage on the west side rather than east side. Rowlette concurs. Nolan felt there would have to be some concessions in the way of hardcover. Rowlette stated that she’s not as concerned about the average lakeshore sei back as much as the hardcover within the 0-75 ’, especially with the elevation as is causes the rainwater runoff and debris to run into the lake. Schroeder suggested issue could be tabled or voted on now. Tabling would give them opportunity to change plan. Contractor preferred the Commission to vote on the issue. It was moved by Smith, seconded by Nolan to recommend denial of the application for James Spinner, 940 North Arm Drive, which includes variances. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5) #1854 TROY ANDERSON 1490 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Troy Anderson was present. MmK.* explained that applicant has already received variance approval for a side .setback variance for a second stoiy addition. One of the conditions of the approval was that there were tobecertain land.scaping improvements completed by adeadline. Sheasked applicant whether plantings are complete. Mr. Anderson stated that the trees are scheduled to be planted awaiting a new septic to be installed. The trees are on-site. Mabusth explained that applicant now' propo.ses a 26’x26’ garage to the north side of the existing residence requiring both side and rear.setback variances. Theexi.sting re.sidence is20'6'' from the lot line and the garage addition will be 16’ from the side lot line. The .struct jre will be 44' from the rear lot line. Structure will also be placed over portions of the existing septic system so a new septic system will be installed. Smith asked for clarification as to where the trees are to be planted. Mr. Anderson showed where they are located presently and stated that they would be moved to the east side of the structure. Smith asked what applicants plan is for completing the second story. Mr. Anderson explained that the only remaining improvement is siding. He explained that he did not originally apply for the variance because he didn’t plan to build the garage as funds were not available. Now he has applied for financing for improvements but is required to complete the garage, siding and septic before financing will be completed. Schroeder .stated that the Commission doesn’t want to feel pressured to approve the application for financing reasons. He also stated that there is some concern about the length of time to complete the construction and that is a larger than normal garage. Mr. Anderson stated that the garage is oversized because there is no ba.sement and the garage will serve as storage space. Schroeder asked if the garage were a normal size would it remove one of the setback variances. Mabusth explained that the setback variance could be minimized somewhat but that the normal 2-stall garage is 24 ’. Rowlette asked had any neighbors responded? Mabusth re.sponded that there is an unsigned letter in the packet. It was noted that applicant is removing the old driveway. Nolan raised a concern about the entrance to the garage because of the .sharp turn and lack of back-out area. Mr. Anderson stated that he hadn't thought about it but that he would plan fora backout area that would have to expand to both the north and west. There are no hardcover concerns with the property. Smith asked about how long until the work is completed. Mr. Anderson stated that it is his de.sire to complete the work in 60 days and that work would commence as .soon as he receives the permit and when he cai .schedule the septic work. Schroeder asked whether the Commission should tie approval of the construction of the garage to the completion of the past projects including the planting.s. 8 Mabusth responded that it could be done and has been done in other situations. Rowlette stated that she would like to see additional Arbor Vitae planted on the east and along the fence to the north since there will be some trees and vegetation lost. Applicant agreed to request. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval of application # 1854 subject to additional conditions that Arbor Vitae be planted on the north side, similar to the condition imposed before, that the planting be installed prior to construction, that siding has to be completed except for the area behind the house by the garage and must be completed before staff issues the permit for the garage, that applicant work with stall to address the driveway and need for adequate backout apron to a.ssure safety for u.sers of private shared drive, that septic testing must be completed and old driveway must be removed w’ithin 60 days (November 20, 1993). Vote; Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#6) #1855 PAUL E. BOWMAN 3458 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Paul Boman was present. Mabusth explained applicant propo.ses a second story over the existing single story structure. The second floor expansion w ill no encroach the average lakeshore .setback line. There will be an additional 2-story structure built over an existing deck on the side where they have a 13 ’ setback. The existing chimney at 4’8" from the side lot line will also be expanded vertically. The 2-story addition consists of an entry way on the first floor and closet on the second floor. Peterson commented that the only resident affected is to the east and asked if that neighbor had made any comments. Mabusth responded that no neighbors have commented. She al.so commented that hardcover remains at 24.8% It was moved by Peterson, .seconded by Rowlette, to recommend approval of Application # 1855 for Paul E. Bowman, 3458 North Shore Drive for variance to side setback. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#7) #1856 MARK AND JENNY PRUETER 3215 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Mark and Jenny Prueter were present. Mabusth explained that applicant received approval for a rear addition of 18'x26 ’, including a deck to the west. He received hardcover and setback approvals, and average lakeshore .setback approval for the replacement of a deck in the lakeside yard. He proposed removals within the 0-75 ’by breaking out .some solid concrete and replacing with pads, the cement entry patio was reduced to 7’xlO'. Drainage was to be rerouted to theea.st lot line, collecting into an existing drainageway. Council held to the originally propo.sed hardcover percentage w hich was at 29.4%. The current proposal shows a 10*x26' rear addition with a 5*x2r deck to the rear and a single story enclosed entry 6’x5 ’. Over that will be another 3rd story. The issues for the current review are the side setbacks, the average lakeshore setback, the hardcover excesses and now the issue of a height question. The code states that height of structure can be no more than 30’ or 2-1/2 stories. The lower level has to be classified as a full story since more than 50'>o is above grade. The structure is now considered a 3-stoiy structure per the building code. Total height is 29 ’6". Side setbacks are slightly improved, hardcover is currently propo.sed at 29.5%. The applicant is now asking that the sidewalk remain in the solid configuration for ea.se of maintenance and the cement pad is now at 9'10". Mabusth stated that if this configuration is allowed there won't be a reduction in hardcover in the 0-75' and hardcover is now at 29.5% rather than 29.4%. Applicant commented that the walkway was 53' and the City Council suggested removal of 65 s.f. and in the current propo.sal reduces the walkway to 35' or 105 .sq. ft. hardcover. Schroeder asked if there is a way to get the hardcover down. Mr. Prueter responded that the 9’xlO' pad in the front could be reduced to 7 and 10. Schroeder said he’d w ant to make proposal as close to what w as originally proposed. Peterson a.sked whether any neighbors had any concerns regarding this addition. Mabusth noted the letters from the neigiibors. Lindquist commented that house to east of applicants will be significantly taller than proposed structure. Rowlette commented that it would be difficult to remove snow and ice on pads and that it doesn ’t make sense for a main w^alkway. It was moved by Lindquist, .seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1856 subject to reducing hardcover to 29.4%. Vote; Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#8) #1857 JAMES L. STINSON 2623 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Stimson was present. Applicant proposed 11.5’x 18’addition to the lakeside of residence and the reinstallalion of a 11.5’x21' deck adjacent to the addition. It will be placed where there is a landscaped area underlain with geotechnic fabric that wasn ’t recorded. The propo.sed improvement results in an increase in hardcover. Mabuslh asked applicant if any other landscape areas had geotechnic fabric. Mr. Stinson responded that all landscape areas are lined with geotechnic fabric. Mabusth stated that the fabric will have to be removed as the City of Orono considers the fabric as hardcover and the property is already at greater than 50''/o. Mabusth continued that there is an average lakeshore setback encroachment of 11.5’. The house on one side is 7.5’ from the lot line which requires a side setback variance for new construction. Hardcover excesses exist. The property shares a parking area. There is no hardcover in the 0-75 ’ area. Mabusth asked the Commission where the additional hardcover removals could come from? There have been no comments from neighbors. Rowlette commented that there is an incredible amount of hardcover on the property and she would prefer to hold it at the existing or reduce it. Mabusth stated that hardcover is proposed to increase by 59 s.f. Rowlette mentioned the proximity of homes to one another and the concern about allowing the lakeside addition to encroach into the average lakeside setback with regards to the fact that a new setback is being created which might induce neighbors to want to make the same kinds of vaiiances or improvements closer to the lake. Mr. Stinson brought up the point that his neighbor on the right has no window looking onto his property. Schroeder cautioned that windows could be added to that side of the neighbors home in the future. Mr. Stinson countered that the area is heavily wooded enough that there should be no concern about privacy issues. Nolan concurred with Schroeder and felt that Commission should make the effort to improve the situation ami suggests that applicants review the situation. His main concern is the hardcover rather than the average lakeshore setback. Schroeder stated that he feels the lakeshore setback is a bigger concern. Mr. Stinson a.sked for clarification of the average lakeshore setback. Mabusth explained how the setback is created and that the big concern is w'ith homes or additions being built closer and closer to the lake. Schroeder commented that the home 2 doors down from the subject property along with the subject property could create a new average lakeshore setback and the neighbor between then could then build an addition to that new averagelakeshore setback without having to acquire a variance. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Rowletle, to recommend denial of application #1S57 for James L. Stinson, 2623 Casco Point Road, for variances. V'ote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#9) #1858 JOHN AND MARLA MERIDITH 3685 WATERTOWN ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Mr. and Mrs. Meridith were present. Applicant is proposing the installation of a 4,800 s.f. indoor riding arena requiring variances to the allowed oversized accessor)' structure on a property that exceeds 9 acres. It also requires a variance to the allowed total area of acces.sory structu.; ; on the property. Applicant is requesting a variance of 1,800 s.f. for the individual accessor) *ructure, as well as a variance of 2,288 s.f. for the total area of all accessory structures on the p- operly. The issu-e of septic has been resolved. Septic is located in the eastern pasture area. Mabusth asked the applicants to obtain a sur\'ey showing exact locations of all structures. Lindquist asked if the hou.se is on a separate parcel? Mabusth responded that both parcels were under the same ownership and they combined both parcels when the applicants installed the barn. Peterson asked what the height of the structure is. Mabusth responded that it would be 22’ to the peak. Peterson asked how many horses are on the property. Mrs. Meridith re.sponded that there are 4 and pos,sibly would be one more. Schroeder asked what the plans are for the structure - would it be a. business. Mrs. Meridith responded that it would not be for business purposes but that ,sh? needed a place to train her horses that she enters in shows. She went on to explain that the structure is the minimum size pos.sible for the .safety of horses since working them in a small area is very harmful to their legs. Mrs. Mabusth submitted letters irom the neighbors stating their approval of the structure. Mabusth asked what color the structure would be. Mrs. Meridith .stated that it would be the samecolor as other buildings - beige w ith w hite trim. ! It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval of application #1858 for John and Marla Meridith, 3685 Watertown Road for variances discussed being that the accessory structure is 4,800 s.f. instead of the allowable 3,000 s.f Smith added that if the property was ever subdivided, the owner would take responsibility for those structures. Also required is the updated survey, and the understanding that maximum allow able horses on this properly is 7 based on the size of the land and is for personal use and not a business. Vole: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#10) #1859 JEFFREY H. MUELLER 222 BEDERWOOD DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Mueller was present. Mabuslh explained that the applicant .seeks approval of a setback variance that would allow an accessory structure to be placed in the front of the front line of the principle structure. The structure will also require a side setback variance. The improvement involves a complete replacement of the detached garage within the street yard of the properly. It will be built within the current building envelope. Mabusth asked the applicant whether he could move the structure over enough to meet the side setback. Mr. Mueller agreed that he could do that. It was moved by Rowlelte, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of application #1859 for Jeffrey H. Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive for accessory structure built in front of the front line of the principle structure. Vote; Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#11) #1860ZELMA H. MCKINNEY 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING Mrs. McKinney was present and accompanied by her daughter, Gayie Siegler. Mabusth explained that property is located in Navarre Heights on Livingston street. Mrs. McKinney purchased the property in May, 1962 when triplex use w'ould have been permitted. It was always used as a rental properly. There have been zoning amendments since whereby only single family residential use would be allowed. Mrs. McKinney is applying for a conditional u.se permit per Section 31 100 of the 1975 Code. Mrs. McKinney seeks approval of two residential units; one to r>e owner-occupied and the other a rental apanmeni. The majority of neighbors that called were .satisfied to hear that the property won U be ow'iier- occupieJ duplex and only one neighbor preferred to see the properly revert to single family dwelling status. Commission members fell the properly was visually appealing and if the properly did revert to single family, the exterior of the structure would not be altered in anyway. 13 I J Mabuslh reviewed the ownership pattern of the development lots of the Navarre Heyette neighborhood as follows: 12 single lots, 14 as double lots, and 1 as three combined lots. Nolan asked how the City enforces occupancy status. Mabusth explained that the conditional u.se permit would be filed in the chain of title. Row’lette asked if there are other properties like this Mabuslh explained that there are some non-conforming use properties and clarified that there are similar properties in the neighborhood. Schroeder asked if there is a deadline to file this conditional use permit. Mabuslh slated that she was not aware of any deadline established in the code and asked members upon their review of the pertinent section of the code if they concurred. Rowlelle brought up the point that this would be a good time to revert the properly to conform with current standards, gelling it into the single family dwelling status. Smith asked about the pros and cons of single family vs. duplex if the properly w ere for sale. Mabusth staled that it w ould be more consistent if it were zoned single family, but reiterated that there are other properties similar to this in the neighborhood. Rowletle asked about the floor plans of the unil.s/number of bedrooms (4) as it relates to the number of possible vehicles parked on the properly. Mabusth explained that there is a tw'o stall garage and adequate room for two car parking on the property. Mrs. McKinney commented that there are currently two people living upstairs. It was moved by Nolan, .seconded by Peter.son, to recommend approval of application #1860 for Zelma H. McKinney, 3599 Livingston Avenue recognizing the conditions for approval as set forth by staff. Vote: Ayes 6; Nays 1. Rowlette voted .Nay. (#12) #1861 JEFFREY S. LEECH 720 NORTH ARM DRIVE, VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Jeffrey S. Leech was present. Applicant propo.ses the in.siallalion of a new foundation under the existing detached garage w ithin the street yard of the lakeshore lot. The existing garage is lo .rated within substandard street and side setbacks. There are excesses of hardcover on the prt pet ty. Mabuslh explained that the structure is located on a severely limited lot. The required setback for a garage with the door opening toward the street is 30' and the garage is located 1 '7" from the street lot line and 29 ’ from travelled road. It is located on a shared driveway. The required sideyard setback is 10' and the structure is I'S" from the side lot line. Smith asked if the applicant considered putting the garage at the end of the shared driveway. Mabusth asked if they considered an attached structure. Mr. Leech renlied that he had not considered it. Mabusth noted that a detached garage would have to be 10' from the principle structure. Nolan asked if the sidewalk w ould be replaced and noted that there is a drainage problem as water pools in the middle of it. Smith noted the deck in the 0-75 ’ and asked if the deck was there when they purchased the home. Mr. Leech replied that the deck was there when they purcha.sed the home. Smith asked about what appears to be an e'*osion problem near the shoreline. Mr. Leech responded that he is addressing the issue as they can aflbrd to make improvements. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of application #1861 for Jeffrey S. Leech, 720 North Arm Dnve as listed subject to working with staff on drainage problems. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 1 . Rowletle felt the hardcover issue should have been addressed to find ways to reduce it. Chairman Schroeder asked for a 5 minute recess. (13) #1863 ROBERT LUESSE 3249 CASCO CIRCLE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Luesse was pre.sent. Mabusth explained that when the Commission originally approved the application it had several other improvements. 1 he garage was based on a former survey which showed the garage 3’ from the lot line. An updated survey shows the garage is 2’4 ” from the lot line. Mr. Luesse was given opportunity to start construction by off-setting the structure 8" but he opted instead to come back to the Commi.ssion with a new proposal. Peterson asked if there were any comments from the neighbor to the north. Mr. Luesse responded that he had talked with the neighbor but he did not have any concerns regarding the propo.sal as he originally approved an extension along the existing setback. There was some discussion as lo the s.f. figures in the original hardcover sur\ey and it was discovered that some of the figures had been rounded off. It was moved by Rowlelle, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of application #1863 for Robert Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle, for the amended variance application subject to the installation of a firewall. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#14) #1864 IRWIN JACOBS 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING Jim Jenson represented Mr. Jacobs. Mabusth explained tha-l the application involves a conditional use permit for a new caretaker residence to replace an older caretaker residence on the original 2.7 acre parcel. Mabusth explained that there were previous applications for vanances for a guest hou.se and oversized accessory structures and those applications had been approved. The .structure meets the 100' lakeshore setback and that only a grade level patio is propo.sed within the 75-100’ setback area which is allowed by the current code. The structure will also be decreased by 349.8 s.f. Peterson asked if anyone was able to view the property. Rowlelte responded that she went to the gate and the caretaker came to get her and showed her around the property. Schroeder commented that there wasa breakdow n in communication and sugge^ ted that it be addres.sed. Peterson stated that he was not certain of whether he could vote on the property as he was denied access to the property. Mr. Jenson apologiied for the breakdown in communication and said he would address it. Schroeder asked why Mr. Jacobs wanted to build the structure. Mr. Jensen replied that the existing structure is very old and in great disrepair. Schroeder asked which Commission members were able to view the property and a.sked whether it could be voted on now. Rowlette commented that .she had no problem with the propo.sal. She d.scovered in her conversation with the caretakers that the structure doesn't even have a foundation under it - it’s just a dirt lloor with wood over it. Schroeder a.sked about the .septic. Mr. Jensen said that it is in process. ll was moved by Rowletle, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend approval of application #1864 for Irwin Jacobs, 1700 Shoreline Drive for the Conditional U.se permit variance to rebuild the accessor\ structure subject to the size of acces.sor>’ structures, that the on-.site .septic testing will be completed for a principle and an alternate .site, and that the structure can never be used as a rental. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#1S) #1865 David Owen 2248 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Owen was present. Mabusth explained that applicant would like to rebuild the foundation of his garage and parking pad and improve drainage by raising the foundation 8" (water from the street rushed into his garage). Structure is located T+ from street lot line and doesn't meet required side setback. Mabusth asked Mr. Owen if there would be structural repairs to the garage. Mr. Owen replied that there would be some, along with retaining wall repair, slab removal and inslallali«T: of safety rails. Mabusth explained that the major problem for the property owner is that in the early 50’s the County took an easement for snow fencing (not right of way) at the end of his driveway. The County has advi.sed us that they are willing to relea.se theea.sement but the City of Orono needs the right of way for Crystal Bay Road. Gerhard.son has advi.sed that the City needs only the portion of the ea.sement defined as travelled road. The structure w ould then be located 10' from the street. Peterson commented that he viewed the property the night before and .saw the water rushing into the garage. Mr. Owen stated that the garage is actually lower than the street. Nolan asked what Mr. Owens p'ans are for the water problem and wondered if drainage wasn’t addre.s.sed properly, the water would be averted onto the neighbors property. Nolan also asked if the garage door opening would remain the same. Mr. Owen stated that he would actually lift the garage and replace it on the new foundation Nolan asked if Mr. Owen planned to clean up the concrete on the side of the garage. Mr. Owen staled that he has plans to clean up the area. Mr. Owen’s intent is to uet the water to drain out onto the street. He felt that the water would stay on his property though i 'it did drain back from the street, drainage would go around the garage on ihe east side because of a small berm or landform between the properties. Schroeder asked if the neighbors are aw'are of his plans. Mr. Owen responded that both neighbors are aware. Rowlette felt that the City has to be involved in solving the drainage problem. Peterson felt that if the foundation is built up as proposed and done right, that the water would drain back down Cry'stal Bay Road. Lindquist concurs. Nolan stated he would like to see some elevations to insure that the job is done right. Mr. Owen agreed. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of application #1865 for David Owen, 2248 Shadywood Road, with the understanding the he work w ith the City on the elevations and drainage problem. Nolan added that he would like to see the debris b^ide the garage cleaned up and removed during the construction. County and City w ill w ork w ith applicant to see that right of way is deeded back to him. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#16) #1866, #1867, #1868 JAMES AND JOANN JUNDT 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD #1866 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING #1867 VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING #1868 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING Mrs. Jundt was present. Mabusth e.\plalned that the.se are actually three separate application.s. #1866 deals with a caretaker apartment on the second floor of the main house. Current owners propose major repair and alteration of original caretaker unit. Access comes via a hallw ay that is entranced from the interior of the house and also from a secondary access via the lower level of the garage. Mabusth asked for clarification of an o-^ning to another bedroom area. Mrs. Jundt explained that their intent is to have a doorway punched out but not open in the event they want to open the rooms to one another in the future. Peterson a.sked what would be the primar>- access. Mrs. Jundt e.vplained that they would have private access through the garage as well as through the hou.se. 18 r Peterson asked why there needs to be two entrances. Mn». Jundl responded that they want the caretakers to have their ow n private entrance. Schroeder explained that the issue for the City is that a private entrance might indicate an intent to rent the unit and asked whether they planned to rent out the unit. He commented that one way to prohibit rental of the unit w ould be to have the principle access through the main house. Mrs. Jundt replied that her intent is not to rent the unit but to have a caretaker living on site. Peterson commented that the two stairways leading from the lower level seem so close that it didn’t seem necessary to have an additional access. The architect for the project explained the stairs seem close on the second lloor level but that they are not close at the bottom. Mabusth noted that the second stairway serves as access from the garage to the kitchen and eventually to the second floor. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend for approval of application #1866for James and Joann Jundt for conditional use permit required for caretaker apartment within the second floor of the mam hou.se as propo.sed. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. #1867 Mrs. Jundt was concerned about the hardship statement that involves the boathou.se and steps. See Exhibit K, # 1. Their plans are not to abandon the boathou.se and steps as the property has historical significance and they want to a.ssessall factors before making a decision on lakeshore improvements. Rowlette explained that it has been the City’s intent to remove non-conforming .structures within the 0-75’ that begin to deteriorate and that applicant would have to work closely with the City on any repair or changes to this structure. Mabusth explained that the stone steps near the boathouse are figured in the hardcover calculations. Architect clarified the size of the deck as well as the purpo.se of the deck. It will be used for storage of dock sections, and not for sitting or viewing. Mabusth stated that there are no particular regulation regarding the light on the deck. Lindquist asked what it would look like. Architect stated that it would be a decorative, low inten.sity type light fixture. Rowlette asked if the dock would connect to the deck. Architect stated that it would have to be connected. Schroeder asked what is normally done with dock sections w hen they are pulled from the water. Architect replied that they are usually laid on the lawn. Schroeder stated that his concern is having a (narrowly defined) structure in the 0-75 ’ area. However, he felt the proposed structure was rea.sonable for dock storage. Schroeder noted that the concern with the structure is that if it is u.sed as sitting or viewing area, there may be many such requests for similar structures. Mrs. Jundt commented that the deck was planned based on the size of the dock. Rowlette stated concern about the fact that there are three stairways. Mabusth noted the code does not limit a property to a specific number of decks. It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend approval of application # 1867 for James and Joann Jundt for variance of a structure within the 0-75 ’ and hardcover within the 0-75 ’, repair ofexisting accessory structures within the 0-75 ’ will require approval, and that deck be used only for dock storage. Vote; Ayes 7 Nays 0. #1868 Mabusth explained that the application involves a conditional use permit for a guest house with a caretaker apartment and greenhouse as well as residential garages. The applicant is not proposing any improvements but staff felt it would be appropriate to advise the applicant to obtain a conditional use permit. It is an oversized acce.ssory structure and does not meet the required side setback. Schroeder asked where we stand with septic. Mabusth explained that the property would be subject to new interim ordinance because the City is evaluating the triggers for when someone has to replace a septic system becau.se of the separation problems with issuance of a building oemiit for improvements. On-site septic inspections will continue. Residents have two years to repair them. This is a non-conforming septic system. Schroeder asked if a decision made on this application would affect the septic issue in any way. Mabusth responded that it would not because this matter has been covered under the permit for this property. ., II It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval for application #1868 for Jamesand Joann Jundt for conditional use permit for guest house and caretaker apartment and variance to area of oversized accessor>- structure. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. It was moved by Berg, seconded by Rowlette, to delete the phrase "will be abandoned" from the hardship statement. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#17) #1870 STEPHEN AND RANDl CARLSON 1185 ARBOR STREET - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING Stephen Carlson was present. Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a single stall garage addition to the existing principle structure that will be located in a sub-standard street setback. The single stall garage has a lower level. The floor is collapsing and is very unsafe. Mabusth asked if this would be a double-level garage. Mr. Carlson responded that his intent is to maintain the lower level garage in the back to use as storage but that addition part would be filled in with dirt. Rowlette noted that there are no hardcover Issues. It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend approval of application #1870 for Stephen and Randi Carlson for variance as listed. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#18) #1871 TAYLOR/LAUER HOMES 1725 BOHNS POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING VARIANCE NO LONGER NEEDED. (#19) #1873 JACK EDWARDS 1340 REST POINT CIRCLE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Jack Edwards was present. Mabusth explained that applicant proposes a 4’xl2' addition to the garage. He’s also putting a lower level 8’xl 1’ storage addition to his existing workshop area. Because his doors face aw'ay from the street he needs only a 10’ setback. Hardcover is reduced by 222 s.f in the 0-75 ’ and 498 s.f in the 75-250 ’. Nolan discussed the issue of drainage and suggested that Mr. Edwards present a grading proposal for the north side between the garage and the hou.se. Mabusth noted that there is a City drainage culvert that outlets on Mr. Edwards property. I- Mr. Edwards slated that he is willing to work with the City on the drainage issue. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of application #1873 for Jack Edwards, 1340 Rest Point Circle as proposed and that Mr. Edwards be given the opportunity to work with the City on the drainage issues. Vole: Ayes 7. Nays 0. (#20) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Nolan reported the Council approved everything and that the only issue of any controversy was Seiss - shared driveway. (#21) OTHER ISSUES Chair Schroeder commented that weare working toward a collective lour. He encourages each member to drive through the marinas. There are seven of them and it can be done rather quickly. (#21) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Schroeder noted that Lindquist’s absence was not noted on the minute:-. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Schroeder to approve the minutes of the August 16, 1993 Planning Commission Minutes. Ayes 7, nays 0. (#22) REPRESENTATIVE TO THE COUNCIL MEETING Rowletle volunteered to attend the September 27, 1993 Council meeting, Lindquist volunteered to attend the October 11, 1993 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT Chair Schroeder adjourned the regular Planning Commission meeting at 11:45 p.m. 7 t V Charles Schroeder, Cfiairperson ' V PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993, 7:00 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Gabriel Jabbour ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS\PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING 1. 7:00 p.m. it\%62 Three Star Trucking - 2590 Watertown Road, - Preliminar>' Subdivision - Public Hearing 7:30 p.m.#1869 Barbara &. Sidney Rebers - 2080 Wayzata Blvd, - Vacation of Easements and Subdivision creating new Easemcnt.s - Public Hearing 7:45 p.m. ^#?872)Orono Woodlands, Inc. and Paul Phillips, 2100/2140 Si,\th Avenue NorOi - Vacation of Drainage & Utilities Easement ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 4.#1850 5.#1854 6.#1855 7 #1856 8.#1857 9.#1858 10.#1859 11.#1860 12.#1861 13.#1863 14.#1864 #1850 James Spinner, 940 North Arm Drive - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing #1854 Troy Anderson, 1490 Long Lake Blvd - Variances - Public Hearing #1855 Paul E. Bowman, 3458 North Shore Drive - Variances - Public Hearing #1856 Mark & Jenny Prueter, 3215 Crystal Bay Ro.id - Variances - Public Hearing #1857 James L. Stinson, 262.3 Casco Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing #1858 John & Marla Meridith, 3685 Watertown Road - Variances - Public Hearing #1859 Jeffrey D. Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive - Variances - Public Hearing Hearing #1861 Jeffrey S. U-ech, 720 North Arm Drive, Variances - Public Hearing #1863 Robert Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle - Variance - Public Hearing #1864 Irwin Jacobs, 1700 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing ;■ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - MONDAY SEPTEMBER 20, 1993, 7:00 P.M. 15. ^1865 David Owen, 2248 Shadywood Road - Variances - Public Hearing 16.James & Joann Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road - a) #1866 Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing b) #1867 Variances - Public Hearing c) #1868 Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing 17. 18. #1870 Stephen & Randi Carlson, 1185 Arbor Street - Variance - Public Hearing #1871 Taylor/Lauer Homes, 1725 Bohns Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing Variance no longer needed. 19. #1873 Jack Edwards, 1340 Rest Point Circle - Variances - Public Hearing Planning Commission Comments 20. Report by Planning Comin!S«;ion Representative to Council Meeting of September 13, 1993. 21. Other issues for discussion. Additional Itr is 22. Planning Commission approval of minutes of the August 16, 1993 meeting 23. Planning Commission to select representatives to attend the September 27, 1993 and the October 11, 1993 meetings of the Council. Adjournment Planr.inq Ccrrr.issicn Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE r CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE V - 0 ' 3 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION PJIQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. TO:Plannin2 Commission Members V- Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A, Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:September 17, 1993 SUBJECT: ff\862 Three Star Trucking, 2590 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - R. Suess, Jr.’s Letter and Exhibits 8/20/93 E - John W. Ploetz Lettei (J. Hallson ’s Attorney, plus Exhibits) F - Survey of Adjacent Residence G - Current Road Layout H - Gustafson Report 9/12/93 I - Planning Commission Action Notice - Sketch Plan Review Application ^1843 J - Wetland Map K - Existing Drainage Patter L - Watershed Map M - Comp Plan Sections N - Subdivision Sections Dealing with Rural Road Development O - Lot 7 with Future Road Corridor Designated and Re-designation of Building Envelope P - Staff Sketches of Options of Development with Seven I.x)t Plat Q - Preliminary Subdivision Applicant proposes a Class III Subdivision of eight lots. The application involves the dedication of public roadway, the creation of a private road with potential exteiision to west, ponding areas for drainage purposes and drainage facilities (i.e., berm to control development runoff, swales, etc.). The pioposed subdivision was reviewed as a sketch plan review at the July Planning Commission meeting. Please review E.xhibit I, the Planning Commission action notice that summarized the direction received from the Planning Commission at the time of that review. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review; Chapter 11, specifically the sections dealing with Class III Subdivisions, review Exhibit N, Section 11.10, Subdivision 21 (C); Section 11.32, Subdivisions 2, 4 and 6; Section 11.32, Subdivision 2 (B-6): Section 11.32, Subdivision 2; Section 11.33, Subdivision 4; Typical Section 11.40, Subdivision 3; Section 11.62, Parks and Playgrounds of the Class II and III Subdivisions specifically Park Dedication Fee; Section 10.28 - RR-IB Zoning District Standards. J Zoning File #1862 September 17, 1993 Page 2 il Comp Plin Sections Dealing with Rural Private Roads, Exhibit M. Review of subdivision application. Total area =19+ acres (.89 acres wet) Zoning District - RR-IB Lot Slandards/Co'nfiguration. The subd' vision proposes seven new lots and Lot 8 remains as the homestead parcel. The surveyor has provided two options of development on the preliminary plan (Exhibit O). One with an extensioii road to the west and one without. The hatched lines desigr»ate the future road corridor and the realignment of the shared lot lines of Lots 7 and 8. All lots are show-n meeting the minimum 2 acre dry buildable. Lots 5 and 6 adjacent to cul-de-sac area do not meet the required 200 ’ at the 50 ’ setback line, h will be necessary to grant width variances. This would be consistent when dealing with lots adjacent to cul-de-sac roadway. This would be the only instance when the City grants lot width variances at the time of subdivision. If extension corridor outlot is approved. Lot 6 would no longer need lot width variance. With the current proposal, the cul-de-sac would not be a temporary cul-de-sac and will still be needed for access to the three norhem lots. Grading/Drainage. Applicant and applicant’s consultants met with the City staff and the City Engineer prior to filing the formal plat in order to diccuss the major drainage issues that must be addressed with the subdivision review and the issue of a future extension road to the west. Review E.xhibit J, there were no designated wetlands within the subdivision but ponding areas have been created in the low arecs of the property as a major drainage way drains from the southwest to the northeast through this property. The majority of surface runoff drains into the Daniel’s Long Lake Heights Subdivision creating problems during wet seasons. There is a severe drainage problem at the southeast comer where drainage runs into Lot 13 and ponds. There are no drainage ditches along the north side of Watertown Road. One of the issues raised during the sketch plan review was whether the enlarged drainage and utility easement area alone the east side that would contain the extensive berming would be credited aeainst dry buildable^area of each lot. During an earlier three lot subdivision review of the property, the City had already approved the crediting of die area against the dr>' buildable. The berm width extends any where from 25’-35’ along the east boundary expanding wherever an attempt is made to save the trees along the east lot line. Review Exhibits H and O, Gustafson notes that the drainage swale along the east propeny line must be lowered to control runoff. He recommends extending the lO20f^ontour 50 ’ to the south and providing a 1021 elevation at the southeavit property corner. This will allow for a .5% grade within the ditch and an attempt to keep the ditch lower than Lots 12 and 13 in the Daniel’s Long Lake Heights Addition. He also r Zoning 1-ile #1862 September 17, 1993 Page 3 adds that the ditches along the private road cul-de-sac and Watertown Road be set at least 2.5 below proposed center line street grade. Proposed elevations along ditches must be altered to retlect this. He also notes that the septic site on Lot 7 shown at an elevation ot 1027 must be protected by requiring that the existing pond on Lot 8 be maintained at a high water level ot 1024 with an outlet ditch at 1023.5 to set normal water level. After reviewing Gustafson report, staff contacted the surveyor to request the necessary hvdraulic calculations to determine site runoff before and alter development. The final calculations shall provide the basis for the accurate sizing of the pond and the height or depth of the berms alone the east side. The surveyor provided the necessary calculations to the engineer earlier this week. Gustafson states that he will provide an updated report either to be included in your packets on Friday or to be presented by staff at your meeting. Our concern is that Lot 4 maintain 2 acres of dry. Lot 4 is now shown right at 2 acres. If the pond is to be expanded and lot lines shifts must be made,as the majority of lots are already at the 2 acre minimum dry buildable, this may result in the loss of one lot. Applicant is advised to commence the permitting process with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Applicant ’s engineer must provide' culvert sizing and grades on grading and drainage plan. There is no information on the outlet control of the pond that is to restrict flow so that there is enough storage for 100 year rainfall event. Hydraulic calculations must be provided reflecting the pond volume, high water level and peak flows. Road/Access. Based on the Planning Commission ’s directives at the time of the sketch plan review and the clear directives of the ordinance and Comp Plan (review E.xhibit M and N), the applicant was advised of the need to provide a future access corridor to the west. Both applicant and owner objected strongly to the City ’s requirement for the future extension corridor claiming an impact on the total number of lots and the homestead parcel. Loi 8, to be sold to owner ’s son. Review E.xhibit D, Mr. Suess’ letter and exhibits. Mr. Suess’ objections reflect the same concerns raised by neighboring property owners when City sought future extension corridors at Golden View Silver View and Woodhaven Drive. No residential owner want a through road. The concern is for potential traffic with a through road where residents purchased homes lo enioy the privacy and less intense use of private roads with cul-de-sac. Although not noted in Mr Suess, Jr.’s letter, there was also a concern with potential diminution in property values tor lots that would be located on future through roads. This would appear to have not impacted the Golden View Drive or Silver View Drive neighborhoods that have been hilly developed m less than five years. Exhibit F is a survey of adjacent residents who also oppose the potential corridor linking Golden View with the private road created in the Suess and Hallson properties. r Zoning File ^1862 September 17, 1993 Pane 4 Review Exhibit E. at the pre-filing meeting with applicant, John Hallson, the owner ot the property to the immediate west, was also invited to attend. During that meeting Mr. Hallson's concern was with the impact of a private road upon the future buildability and dei^ity of his property. Review E.xhibit E, Mr. Hallson*s attorney has written a letter to both the Cay and Mr. Fisher of Three Star Trucking. In that letter, he proposes that his client join m the current subdivision and be part of the determinations as to the exact location ot the future extension corridor. Review the three potential layouts developed by Mr. Ploetz. Staff has enclosed copies of all pertinent sections of the Comp Plan and subdinsion regulations (Exhibits M and N) that were also referred to during the review of the Meyer Dairy Addition and the Peterman Second Addition (Silver View Drive and Golden View Drive). These sections provide the guidelines and authority of the City to seek future extension to undeveloped lands The City has no immediate or future plan to install through roads with the acquisition of these extension corridors. This requirement reflects a basic tenant of good planning tor a future integrated road system when development pressures create the need for through roads. Access to all eight lots shall be via the private road. No direct access will be allowed for any of the lots within the subdivision onto Watertown Road. The City will ask for 33 dedication of right-of-way for Watertown Road. The drainage and utility easements should be shown 10’ along the perimeter ot all property' lines except for the eastern perimeter where easement will be 25-35’ wide. Easement should also be expanded at shared lot lines of 3 and 4. Drainage and utility easements should be 10’ wide along perimeter of the road outlot and 5’ on either side ot the shared interior lot lines. Septic Testing/Septic Design. Unfoitunately, Steve Weckman ’s septic report is not included in your preliminary packets but his report will be available at your Monday night meeting. He has provided the following preliminary comments concerning his review of the septic test infonnation. Septic testing confirms that alt septic systems will be mound septic systems. In a recent visit to the site with the on-site septic evaluator, Weckman found that the septic test sites on Lot 3 were driven over bv heavy equipment and have been completelnegated for future septic use. Additional septic testing must be provided for Lot 3. He also notes that I^t 8 at 3.5 acres will require testing for an alternate site. In the original three lot subdivision, the homestead lot was at approximately 14-15 acres and septic testing was not needed. Park Dedication Fee. Please review Section 11.62, it shall be the City Assessor ’s responsibility to determine die fair market value of the seven lot plat. The park dedication fee shall be at 8% of the fair 1 Zoning File ^1862 September 17, 1993 Page 5 market value. Issues for Consideration 1.Review Exhibit O. Once the future road extension is designated, Lot 7’s building envelope is severely restricted by moving lot lines further east. Where will a home be located? Can 2 acre dry buildable still be maintained? 2.Engineer’s second review will deal with confiiming the size of the retention pond in Lot 4 now shown at .55 acres. If pond is to be enlarged this will have an impact on the available dry buildable area of the subdivision. Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 are all at 2 acres dry. 3.If it is Mr. Hallson ’s decision to join in with the current subdivision, it will be necessary to table the review of the current application and republish tor a ten or eleven lot subdivision. The applicant is aware of Mr. Hallson ’s interest. Applicant should provide direction to the Planning Commission. 4.As the issue of the future road extension seems to be crucial for this review, members should discuss the directives of the code and Comp Plan and make a specific recommendation. 5.Does Lot 7 have a feasible building envelope? Where would you locaw the residence structure? Moving the lot line east does not open up the building envelope because of the location of the pond. There isn’t enough area to readjust other lot lines. Are there other options of layouts for this subdivision? Is this an eight lot subdivision or a seven lot subdivision? Should road extension be moved further north or south? Review Exhibit P, staff sketches of other layouts for a seven lot subdivision. Option.s of Action 1.Depending upon applicant’s response to joining with Mr. Hallson in a comprehensive subdivision of the two properties, it would be staff’s recommendation that the current application be tabled and to encourage a joint subdivision application between Three Star Trucking and Hallson; or 2.To recommend approval of an eight or seven lot subdivision, subject to the following condition:: A. The subdivision application cannot be presented before the Council until septic testing is completed for the homestead parcel and for Lot 3 and area Zoning File #1862 September 17. 1993 Page 6 of pond within Lot 4 is confnmed B. Dedication of 33’ of right-of-way for Watertown. C. Designate drainage and utility easements 10 ’ along the perimeter ot boundaries of the property and the perimeter of the road outlot except tor east boundary of property where drainage and utility easements shall be shown at 25-35’ widths and shared lot lines at 3 and 4, 5 drainage and utility easements can be shown on either side of the shared lot lines of the remaining lot. D. Complete preparation for filing of permit with MCWD and submit copies of all information to City. E. Applicant shall fulfill all requirements set forth by engineer in his report of September 13, 1993. Grading and drainage plans are to be amended to reflect engineer ’s directives as follows: (1) Pond in Lot A to be shown at a high water level of 1022 with an outlet ditch maintaining normal water level at 1023.5. (2) Drainage swale at east property line shall be altered by extending the 1024 contour 50 ’ to the south and providing a 1021 elevation at the southeast property comer. (3) Ditches along cul-de-sac and Watertown Road must be set at 2.5’ below proposed center line street grade. (4) Culvert sizes and grades should be shown on grading and drainage plan. (5) Proposed holding pond on Lot 4 should be designed with an outlet control to store 100 year rainfall event with a restricted outflow. Calculations should be provided showing the pond volume, high water level and peak flow. F. Preliminary plan should show funire road extension as Outlot B. The City will acquire access and utilit)- easements over Outlots A and B. Developer should create private covenants to deal with the shared ownership, upkeep and maintenance of said private road within Outlot A, G. Designation and dedication of existing pond and retention pond as Zoning File #1862 September 17, 1993 Page 7 drainage easements” on the plat. H.Protection of drainfield sites via fencing shall be in place prior to construction of roadway and drainage improvem.ents and shall remain in place until lots are developed. CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address • •-* f. ^. ■ ,•V \\ 77 JL /yc Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) __ _ Please check one - Property _ _ _ abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. ^ ______________________________ APPLICANT Phone (home)—----------------------- Name 7A/?£:^ Sif)n Phone (work) ^73-0 70.,^----- Address: Gc (a _________ City: P//MP{ttil------ Phone (home) ^^OWNER (if different ^han applicant) __ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (work) — r ^ fAjocArh^y^ Citv :y^^ >4^c- _Zipt Name Address _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres V7et Land Acres Total/ all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ __ Present Zoning District !. u * “ . . kl PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes .. - - Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building, sites).' ' T—r .• - .'V* b.* » V A* / Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:/Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: i V & Units per 0^ Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)X Residential Other (specify) <r J 2. 3. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 4. Certification bj Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official' s Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III)$200.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class I S II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application 150.00 Renewal of Final Subdi\ision Application 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and Vhirther agrees to pay al^^^^it^^^l^^s^blished by ordinance. Applicant's Signature _________ Date C» - 2 3 Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^ . } - RUN DATE 06/24/9S BATCH 002 PROP AOOR d^R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR Ot>PIER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADOR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR d«4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR Ot>94ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AOOR 0»«4ER NAME TAXPAYER ^4AME/ADDR MrmEPIN COdiTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0HT4ERS LIST 30 33-118-23 44 0007 00038 ADDRESS UT^ASSIGNEO VIL OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY Ml 55323 38 33-118-23 44 0010 00141 HACKDERRY HILL DAVID P FISCHER ETAL DAVID FISCHER 141 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE m 55364 38 33-118-23 44 0013 00095 HACKBERRY HILL D D PEASLEY ETAL DUNHREATH PEASLEY 95 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE m 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0016 00051 HACKDERRY HILL J M MIELKE A R J rUELKE RICHARD J A JANELLE M MIELKE 51 HACKBERRY HJIL LONG LAKE UN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0019 02480 HATERTOMN RD R H HAGMAN A J B HAGflAN RICHARD H A JUNE B HAGMArj 35 HACKDERRY HILL LONG LAKE UN 55356 . 38 33-110-23 44 0024 00066 HACKBERRY HILL T G GAVARAS A J B MILLER THOMAS G GAVARAS 66 HACKDERRY HILL ORONO m 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0008 00185 HACKBERRY HILL R H FERRY ETAL R W PERRY 1G5 HACKDERRY HILL lOm LAKE MN 55356 38 33-110-23 44 0011 00125 HACKBERRY HILL P A A M L NELSON PHILLIP A NELSON 125 HACKBERRY HILL LONG lake MN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0014 00081 HACKBERRY HILL DAD DALY DANIEL P DALY 01 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 33-118-23 44 0017 00035 HACKBERRY HILL R H HAGMAN ETAL RICHARD N HAGMAN 35 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE m 55356 30 33-110-23 44 0022 00080 HACKBERRY HILL J E MOCK A 0 L MOCK JAMES A DANA ttOCK 80 HACKBERRY HILL IVUG LAKE MN 55356 30 33-110-23 44 0075 00050 HACKDERRY HILL CHARLES D AUTRY ET AL CHARLES B AUTRY 50 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE JJN 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 6 38 33-118-23 44 000<> 00155 HACKBERRY HILL PETER IRHIN rOSSEN ETAL MR PETER I F03SEN 155 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE M?4 55356 38 33-110-23 44 0012 00104 HACKBERRY HILL KURT C SCHMID KURT C SCHMID 109 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-110-23 44 0015 00065 HACKBERRY HILL DONALD M DAHL ETAL DONALD M A KAREN S DAHL 65 HACKBERRY MILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 30 33-110-23 44 0018 00035 HACKBERRY HILL R M NAGMAN ETAL RICHARD H HAGMAN 35 HACKDERRY HILL LOtIG LAKE m 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0023 00096 HACKDERRY HILL RUBY L SIFORD RUBY L SIFORD «6 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE tJN 55356 38 33-118-23 44 0026 00036 HACKBERRY HILL II H HEAR ETAL NULIAM H HEAR BCX 306 LONG LAKE MN 55356 .•V L-J r.• <1; ♦ •• .•* ' •4- ■■'r'k\ V * ■ t.i. f • i A ••V •• 4 ''J ' $ •f** 1 * •• f * •1 . • I ‘I t S T - f i • k ( 'i • i,'* I ^c,C‘. ui :1 .i*.'- ‘f '!•' : ■ * . V ' ' * J t I L-.. -L ■ *; ORUN DATE 06/2A/95BATCH 002PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAitE/AODR 58 0<*-117-23 12 000702645 HATERTOt'M RO PATRICIA C OICKEY PATRICIA C DICKEY 2645 HATERlOtIN RO LOtJG LAKE 55556 IIEIJUEPIM COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OiniERS LIST50 35 110-23 41 000500225 WILLOW DR N JAMES 0 DILI MAN JAMES D DILLMAN 225 WILLOW OR NO LONG LAKE MN 55356 report no. PI455401 PAGE S50 75-118-23 41 000002565 WOODHAVEN OR N 8 M PASMORE NEAL K 8 MARY 0 BASHORE 2565 WOODHAVEN OR LONG LAKE 131 55356 o PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER name TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR OI«IER NAME TA.XPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER name TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP AOOR OWNER name taxpayer NAME/AODR 58 55-118-25 41 0010 02445 WOODHAVEN DR J 8 P HARRIS JOHN T 8 PATRICIA L HARRIS 2445 WOODHAVEN DR long lake MN 55356 58 55-118-25 42 0012 02675 SILVER VIEW OR T W ISAACS 8 R ISAACS THOMAS W 8 ROSALYNOA ISAACS 2675 SILVER VIEW OR LONG LAKE l»l 55356 58 53-118-25 43 0005 00170 GOLDEN VIEW DR JOHN HALLSON JOHN T HALLSON P O BOX 171 LONG LAKE IW 55356 50 55-118-25 44 0001 02540 WATERTOWN RD ROBERT F SUESS ETAL RODERT F SUESS 2590 WATERTOWN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 58 53-110-23 44 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED VILLAGE OF ORONO VILLAGE OF ORONO X WALTER R PENSON CRYSTAL MN 50 53-118-23 41 0016 02525 WOODHAVEN DR C J O'CONNOR 8 L S O'CONNOR CHRISTOPHER J O'CONNOR AND LVNETTE S O'CONNOR 2525 WOODHAVEN LONG LAKE MN 55356 50 53-118-23 42 0014 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO D 0 PETERSON 8 K L PETERSON DONOVAN D 8 KAREN L PETERSON 55323 2715 SILVER VIEW DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 50 53-110-23 43 0009 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J F 8 M C P VOGT ET AL GVD HA 05 GOLDEN VIEW DR LONG LAKE Tt» 55356 30 33-110-23 44 0002 025«0 WATERTOWN RO ROBERT F SUESS ETAL ROBERT F SUESS 250J WATERTOTIN RD LOfIG LAKE MN 55356 30 33-110-23 44 0005 00140 HACKBERRY HILL L E GLEASON ETAL LAWREtTCE E GLEASON 140 HACKBTRRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 41 0017 02485 WOODHAVEN OR MARK W WOLF MARK W WOLF 2405 WOODHAVEN DR LOtTG LAKE MN 55356 58 33-110-23 45 0004 02640 WATERT018I RD T P GORMAN S L T GORMAN T P 8 L T GOKMAN 2640 WATER!CMN RO S LONG LAKE t!N 55356 38 33-110-23 43 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO LILLIAN B PETERMAN ET AL TAXPAVER TO LET FORFEIT •r 58 53-110-23 44 0003 00170 HACKBERRY HILL VILLAGE OF CRONO VILLAGE OF ORONO ’/. HALTER R CENSON CRYSTAL DAY MN 55323 30 33-110-23 44 0006 00126 HACKBERRY HILL VIL OF ORONO CITY CF ORONO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MM 55325 9 - • 9 • c • i ' • f ■ -ti S' f I . • J'*- ( 1' V‘ ■ • ' i ♦ » 4 * .1 L « •'V ( ) ♦ RUN DATE 06/2A/93^ BATCH 002 PROP ADDR d^ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 55-118-23 0027 00022 HACKDERRY HILL M J ERNHART 5 T A ERNHART MICHAEL J ERNHART 22 HACKDERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 55356 HEI4NEPIN COUfiry PROPERTY If4F0RMATI0N SYSTEM PROPERTY OUNERS LIST 58 33-118-23 <*<* 0020 026<^0 HATERTOIW RO H fi P ELLIS HALTER T ELLIS 24<i0 HATEPTOHN ROAD LOrJG LAKE m 55356 REPORT NO. PI655601 PAGE 7 TOTAL BATCH 002 00038 c. ■f.- rf . ♦=te 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OH THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE DEST OF MY KNOULEOGE AND OELIEF. DATE BtdM) 4 t I % ' ( A* # • • V e I e p ML V* V • / ~N r! ,‘- J t 4 ^\}G 2 5 August 20, 1993 To the Orono City Council; I recently moved from Excelsior to the City or Long Lake. I am currently renting a town- hon.e until the spring of 1994, at which time I plan to move to Orono. My wife, two children, and myself will be purchasing the property at 2590 Watertown Road. This is the homestead \vith the 20 acre parcel that is currently in suo-division. My concern is that the City Planning Council intends to build a road to service seven new homes in the area, and connect to roads west of the property. Before the final decision is made, please consider these factors; The majority of the families in the area are young couples with very young children. Young children will always play on or near the streets, riding bicycles, playing ball etc. The addition of a drive-through connection would surely increase speeds and add to the amount of traffic through the neighborhood. One of the main reasons my family is planning to relocate to Orono is that I felt my children would be safer here than on a much busier street. I moved from Excelsior due to heavy, high speed traffic on the drive through residential streets, I hope I won't have to leave Orono for the same reason in the future. To conclude, I feel that a drive through connection would not benefit the area, and in fact would ultimately be a hazard. It would definitely cause an increase in traffic, creating more safety concerns in the future. Children should be able to play safely near their homes, without having to risk being injured by a careless driver. If the city is truly concerned with the safety of it's residents, I hope you will seriously reconsider the plans for the connection. Sincerely, Rob Suess Jr. UL I% ■1 \ u ft 'A >- > ' •// •\ ■j •<* 7 / J ' ■». LETTERS ^T^ghborhood concerned abou t saf ety I - To the editor:' I am one of the frustrated residents of 2nd Avenue that at ­ tended last Monday’s council meeting. Our neighborhood has organized, gathered data, and discussed the traffic problem that concerns our area in Ex­ celsior. Not only did we address the problem, we offered reasonable solutions in hopes of resolving the matter. Last April the council asked the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to complete a traffic study involv­ ing 2nd and 3rd avenues. Divi­ sion Street, and Wheeler Drive. It’s unfortunate that the state was never asked to monitor the access from Highway 7 unto Division. - Nor was the state asked to complete a traffic count so one could detennine the exact amount of traffic these streets are receiving. Instead of allow ­ ing the state to perform their ex­ pertise, the city took it upon itself to do a traffic count. I do not believe the city’s data to be accurate. I saw a group of teenagers jumping on tlie traffic counter — they found it humorous that a little hop could lick tlie counter and account for a vehicle. The city determined that 414 cars exit off Highway 7 unto Division. Of those, 175 lumt^ on­ to 2nd Avenue; the remainder continued down Division. The ci­ ty staff concluded that an average of 787 vehicles use 2nd Avenue per day. The city’s data concludes that very few residents would be af­ fected if the access from Highway 7 onto Division was closed. Mr. Mason of Mason motors believes shutting off the access will affect the Excelsior business district. Is th.at a reasonable fear when only 175 vehicles exiting off the highway are using 2nd .Avenue? Who is to determine that these 175 cars are going into town to do business with Bill Mason or anyone else in E,xcelsior? I live on 2nd Avenue, and I see very few cars turn into town these days. My neighbors and I believe that most of the 175 cars turning onto 2nd Avenue are go ­ ing into Chanhassen. The closing of Christmas Lake Road intensified the problem of Chanhassen residents using our residential streets as a shortcut to get home. I do sympathize with them. 'I'heir growing com­ munity does not have direct ac ­ cess onto Mill Street from Highway 7. That is a problem, and it affects my neighborhood. It’s too bad that our elected of­ ficials can ’t cooperate with the state ’s recommendation to close the access from Highway 7 onto Division. The state recognizes that access to be a safety hazard. It is also very unfortxmate that our elected officials neglectfully Ignore a serious problem. One would think that the council would be concerned enough to at least assign a task force to in­ vestigate the situation. But our elected officials pro­ ceeded in their usual manner — their approach is to ignore the issue and hope it goes a ’vay. Our neighborhood will con­ tinue talking with MnDOT in hopes of finding a solution for our existing safety problem. We welcome any and all possible solutions. I am sincere when I state that I fear for my chil­ dren’s safety and the safety of others livdng among these streets. A child’s life is worth the effort to resolve this matter. .Many thanks to the .Sun-Sailor for the great coverage regar ­ ding this issue. Cindv Studer Excelsior The Minnetonka Early Childhood Family Education Program (ECFE) has several openings in various parent/child classes for the Fall/Winter .ses­ sion that begins the week of Sept. 20. C’lafi ’feff foc-Tinit. the mini-series, “The Spirited Child” and the S.T.E.P. paren ­ ting class. ECFE is for all families with children ages . birth through kindergarten. ECP'E helps families meet the challenges of parenting by. providirur iiiforma- EFCE Rainbow Room expanding .Minnetonka School District’s Early Childhood Family Educa ­ tion’s Rainbow Room preschool is expanding to include an addi ­ tional session- for 4-yearold children. r.-v ExcelsiOf/Sr OLD I4EWSPAPERS ARE Save your paper l^RCI liH j.> u& f mt RoiES • Additions • Sir r .iJ ^ 1993 icycling nan ifsity U/eekend classes. usiness administra- :omputer systems, ind law enforcement. business, criminal ire ition r. Pnul 341-7250 In r infbrmMion sessions: sday, June 22 sn and 6 p.m. Paul Campus E. Seventh St. 1.301. Bldg A in versity System cator LD LIOHT • WE did! , the streets and all ed the fireworks in lid not have done it of money and time Jividuals. Wighborhood group growing in effort to close Hwy. 7 exit Issue 'council ’s Aug. 2~agenaa By John .Mugford Last month, the Excelsior Ci­ ty Council decided it would not pursue steps to close the exit from eastbound Highway 7 onto Division Street. Since that decision, however, residents in the area between the trunk highway and Mill Street have organized in an ef­ fort to close the exit. In Its quest for satisfaction, the group has met with state Rep. Jerry Knickerbocker, IR- Minnetonka, opened com­ munication Nvith the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), and gotten its plea back on the Excelsior City Coun­ cil agenda for the Aug. 2 meeting. -At a meeting two weeks ago, 40 residents showed up and organized into eight groups, or neighborhood blocks. Elach block has two or three chairper­ sons who inform neighbors atxMit upcoming meetings or ac­ tions by MnDOT or the city. Cin­ dy Studer, an informal leader of the residents, said she is now working a couple of houre a day on the quest. • We tliought the council ig­ nored us as a group,” said Studer. "But we don’t think Uicy ’re going to be able to ignore us much longer.” Mayor John Anderson said he did not agree. “We've put in some signs over there and reduced speeds in some places, just like the residents want^,” Anderson said. “And we’re certainly open to listening to anything more they have to say or that the state has to say. But when it comes to dosing the exit, we jiist might not be able to please them. When you ’re on the council, you realize you can’t satisfy all the people all the time.” Last week the residents in- EXCELSIOR vited Knickerbocker to visit their neighborhood and watch as cars e.xited off Highway 7 onto Division Street, some taking right turns onto Second Avenue and traveling to Mill Street. About a dozen residents stood uith Knickerbocker at the exit ramp. Ihe group’s goal is the same as when it started lobbying the council earlier this year — to get the exit closed. But now, in addi­ tion to pushing the idea that residents are not safe because of what they call high traffic counts for a residential area, the neighbors are also pushing the idea that the exit itself is simply not safe. “We’ll be asking the council to get an independent engineering firm to look at whether the exit is safe,” Studer said. “If a firm finds that it’s unsafe, we want it dosed. MnDOT recommends that exits like this one be 300 feet long. But this one’s only 130 feet. Besides, 1 think it makes drivers slow doum too much while in traffic, and it comes up so quickly.” When the neighlwrs first ask­ ed tlie council earlier this year to consider closing the exit, their main complaint was that more and more residents of new sub­ divisions in Chanhassen were using the exit instead of taking alternate routes. Neighbors such as Cathy Lar­ son and Tom Sweeney, both neighborhood block chairs, said the problem increased when Shoreu'ood dosed off the Christmas Lake Road access to Mill Street. And now they say they fear that the opening of a Target Store and a Fleet Farm store in Chanhassen will increase traffic even more. But at an Excelsior City Coun­ cil meeting last month, council members cited a dty traffic count of the area as one reason not to dose the exit. Ibat stu^ showed that 414 cars exited daily from Highway 7 onto Division Street. Of those, 175, or Mbat council memb^ called a relativdy low number, traveled to Second Street. They also said dosing off the exit will force motorists to take the Christmas Lake Road exit and come back throu^ the Divi­ sion Street nei^borhood. Bill Mason, president of the Excelsior Area Chamber of Commerce, presented the dty with a letter expressii^ the chamber’s view that cutting off any exit to Ihe city will hurt the business an^ residential communities. Knickerbocker told the residents he didn’t have any im­ mediate answers to their con­ cerns, but said he would be^ talking to MnDOT officials as well. “I guess 1 want to know if the exit is safe,” Knickerbocker said while standing on Second Avenue. “I’d like to get the di-strict engineer of MnDOT out here to look at it and go from there.” Studer said Monday that MnDOT crews will be out to look at tlie exit this week. “All the people living in new housing in Chanhassen keep us­ ing it as a shortcut to Mill Street and into those new . housing' developments,” Studer “It’s created an unsafe situa­ tion. Someone’s going to get hurt or killed; our children are especially at risk. We want it dosed and if the council isn’t go­ ing to do it, then we’ll continue working with the state.” i. I ' f I * r*} i • *4 4 - -i I i I >:!• 4 ? *»« • ^ ■• * i > • ‘ ‘ ft • • I. •• • - li :V V. • • ’> •V V r^.’ : .»*• • •' -V. : •' ?^: '/ ci/ •-T- •■ -V •”f ; :: ' Kr.‘ •• >. *•? •/.'^rr- v-"* . *, • K- , ♦ • •••* • f • I *..'I • • t * < « <. • /Residents angry after dc___ to leave Highway 7^xit open By John Mugford Kxcrlsior City Council mcnit>€rs lookttl, listened, discussed, and decided Monday not U) close an exit from Highway 7 onto Division Street Aiid as a result of their dtx:!- sion, si’vcral residents of the neighborhood near the exit ex- dainied anger, voumg to take their request up to the Min­ nesota Department of Trar*sixir- talion (MnDOT) In April, several residents from Second and Third avenues in Excelsior said they were con cemcd about safely in their neighborhood and asked the City Council to reduce speeds and add a stop sign, as well as close off the Division htreel exit from Highway 7. ITie City Council responded by pulling in a stop sign at the cor­ ner of Division Stieet and Se­ cond Avenue, and asking MnDOT to consider reducing speeds in the neighborhood and examine the p»\ssibilily of dos­ ing off the exit SlnDOT officials recommend­ ed a lower the speed limit on Third Avenue from 30 mph to 25 rnph But the lop priority of residents in die area just south of Highway 7 is to have the Divi ­ sion Street exit closed They say their neighborhood IS becoming increasingly un­ safe. especially for children, becaase a growing number of motonsLi are Liking the Divi ­ sion Street exit, traveling down Second Avenue and connecting with Mill Street, which leads to new housing propvis .md reUii areas in Chanhassen. Ihey say traffic has increasetl for two years, since Shorewood made Christmas I^ke Road a dead end, culling off its access to Mill Street. “Our neightxirhfxxJ doesn’t have sidewalks and many of tlie yards Ifiem ar<* V'TV sleep ro the tbildien have to wa!k and r:Je their bikes in the .slreeLs,” said Kammy Houghton, a S^xrond Avenue rejadent. “We re bring mg tins issue up for safety’s s,ike Ihe safely of the children has to Lk? pul above die In refernng to Iho btisinc-ssos • • •in town, Houghton was Lalkirg .-<r1 *• • *about the Excelsior /\rea .OiamljcT of Commerce's posi­ ••tion that the exit should remain• • • - f• ••open • r •-1 ;Several residents who spoke •» *!' '*•:f mentioned a letter from Bill• • • • *v .■i Mason. president of the '•’I i : chamber, staling dut die chamber was opposed to dosing •the exit Mason also presented a • . •.** •• •• * *. *.>i : »/ « • .'4 . • * **• 1 . mu petition w ith the names orTnorV dian 100 people opposed to clos­ ing off the exit. Many of those who signed the petition live in ajurtments on the south side of Ibghway 7, in the Excelsior Nursmg Home, and on Linden Street Excelsior United Methcidisl Church also wrote a letter opposing the clos­ ing of the exit. Several residents from Second and 'i*hird avenues questioned w hy the chamber would Lake die stance it did They said motorists traveling west on Highway 7 have already passed ExceLsior’s downtow'n by the lime diey exit at Division Street, which IS a block or so beyond the Mill Street bndge. “If I were a merchant on Water Street, I think I’d want the Division Street exit cinseii,” said Steve Morse, a Third V cnue""f eiIdenTr^'Tluil~w^ulJ mean motonsls would have to exit at County Hoad 19 and go dow-n Water Street to gel to .Mill Street. Tliat’s where all the businesses are.” After several pt*ople said they didn’t understand how closing off the exit would hurt the dowT*lown area. Mason spoke up “That’s not what the ietler says.” Mason said “Since I’ve been so elotjuendy quoted by my learned cntics. 1 dunk they should read the letter” Tlie letter from Mason staled that the chamber “strongly” op­ poses closing the exit. “It is the chamber's opinion that the closing of any access to the city negatively affects the busmess and residential com- HlGinVAY: To tugi-SA/ vSiofi> CRlIISi^Moil V«r««lilc Charicf Company nr UP $16.95/aduli ■ I ■ N.S12.95/children under 12 plus 11 W 11 w % A li tax and gratuity; includes •M brunch and 2 hr. cruise •JU .11.’ Reservations required 3:00 P.H. S:D0 P.N, 1 3/4 hour public cruises cash bar; beer, wine & soft drinks $10/adull $5/children under 12 i fc* • i. • *M.' P.M.- P.M. 3 hour fireworks cruise, cash bar and appetizers $15/person • Reservations required 50 minimum by July 2nd , Ay • • » MtnnMoU Sun Its ibai arv in vKXau .* ., ' Mlnn«aot« Sun PubUc ; • *’ •closing of ail a<Jv9ftis«rs ( : *ccaJ licensing departmern* . f -. empnate license to opera^ • .V cl' ■ ORTH ^ y in U a*'-' V- *yim'h m-m ■:k.§ ; Specializing in EfI for Adulir and Ch- Phon I-KKE initial r Vv I Vj f >• I •V> ■): y Jfjpar lure; from ihe T**io C»Ci- f or orUy $10 you ! receive round trip* coach irantportati p<u» a S^O £ammf . Vipatka|t CaH rvjv* . *r ^ ; to reserve a teat "T ' _______a _ _ ' t»* EXCELSIOR PARK CHARTERS 701 Minnetonka Blvd. • Excelsior • 474-4772 i; L Then »ria« and let the food timet roll V • < Grand Opeaijjl V.v-,. -V • tv • M-I.V; .■'.V i'- :V' > . n. ‘ iu - <‘r-i \rv 1* •* 5 lb Tin of lasagna w/ Loaf of Garlic Bread $12.99 ' Expire! July 3 '‘''■'''^^'*^7 ............... . j Sat 1 Sun Grilled era: 1 Poff $1.00 11-5 hot Cog 4 Pop 50C ____^ USDA Choice; i ^•Bone Steak...........................$4.79 id. Poaerhouse steak . .... ........tii oo ir>. • ■ V"; t <•*•a M.* f r • 1 • *N Highway From page 3A munity,” Mason’s letter states. “The thorougMares are for the use of the entire populous, and should not be dosed to anyone's use unless it can be proven to be a benefit to all." And one by one, council members spoke in opposition to closing the exit ramp. Councilmember Bob Murphy said he was not in favor of mak­ ing “private streets” for any residents in the city. “F’irst of all, the impact on the businesses is not being taken in­ to account here," Murphy said. “The thing is, if we close this ex­ it off, they’ll simply go down to Christmas Lake Road and come back through your neighborhood. 'Ihat won’t be solving anything.” And Murphy said if more traf­ fic is diverted . through downtown, the five-way in­ tersection at Second and Mill streets, near the Excelsior Post Office, will become even more dangerous. He suggested that if the residents wanted to ensure the safety of their children, they should petition the city to builci sidewalks, at the expense of the residents in the area. Other council members pointed to a recent traffic study condiK'lfd by t!ie city, lie study indicatcil tliat *114 cars per day exit off Highway 7 onto Division Street. Of those, the study show­ ed. 175 traveled to Second Avenue. ‘Tm going along witli tlie rest of the council," said Coun­ cilmember Patti Sue Selseth. "It seems only 25 percent of the traffic on Second Avenue came from Highway 7." Other council members pointed out that MnDOT left it up to the city to decide the issue. However, Cindy Studer, of Se­ cond Avenue, said an official with MnDOT indicated that the amount of traffic going through the neighborhood was high. Studer went to the MnLX)T of­ fice Monday to retrieve a letter from R.E. Dixon, a traffic studies supervisor, and deliver it to Mayor J(^ Anderson. TTie letter states; ‘"Ihe (Divi­ sion Street] access apparently funnels more traffic through residential neighborhoods than can comfortably be ac­ comodated. MnDOT feels that closing unsignalized access points on a major highway such as 'Trunk Highway 7 is a good safety measure and we recom­ mend doing so wherever possi­ ble; however, it is the city’s decision to mzike." Murphy said MnDOT was sunply trying to save itself “$7,000 or $8,000 ” by having the city close off the exit. Anderson told residents that the city has already helped them out and will continue to do so by adding more safety signs to the iieighlxirhood. r.ut oul.^.ide Die council chambcTs, Studer and several otliers said they will try to work with MnDOT to close the exit. “We fwl shrugged off.” Studer siiid. “'The council did nothing to help us.” U.S. Savings Bonds fOR iducation grow ALMOST AS (AST AS KIDS DO. Buy U S Savings Bonds — ‘or half their face value — where you work or bank. If you keep them five years or more, you'll earn competitive, market-based rates or a guaranteed minimum rate, whichever is higher For current rate information, call ^ ^ Siin*Sailor Newspap Tlie Sun«Sailor wekoines comxner make for the best reading. the writer and the name of the v the week before an election. The SCHU^ AI Our best ever preview Sci r I I I I L. Come to “Christmt SPEC SPECI Get your weekend off to a flying start will) an Enterprise Rent-a-Car. Our special weekend rate is only $13-99 per day when you rent a subcompaa to.midsize car for 3-5 days, including a • ■ •" Saturday and Sunday. A ' . •; one time fuel deposit of $6.00. Optional CDW is available at $8.00 per day. .>! . HOPKINS ST.L0 1710 Hwy. 7 6801^ o o o ^ ^ ...• -«« ;■ > . EJu:•i•.or/S^CMVMM Sun^aKDi . Mjy. >>gL^3^ ^ - 1 *« • • !•*• . ■ ■ :.' • f i ' M •« • - >.* .• ^ * •>| . ! ••. ! 1 ^ t V*. ” 1^ N»; . - .-.*» -t Neighborhood asks for dosing High\53)Ll_a£c^s By^io hn Mm^ord--------- The Iasi lime a group of neighbors from ihe area of Divi­ sion Street and Second and Third avenues showed up at Ex­ celsior City Hall, they had no formal group name, and for that matter, no formal group But Monday, the Excelsior Ci­ ty Council got to hear from members of Save Excebiur’s Neighborhood (S E N ), the growing group that wants the exit from Highway 7 onto Dm- sicn Street closed They say pedestrians and children who play ui the area are m danger because of Chanhassen motorists who use the exit to travel down Second Avenue to Mill Street. About 20 members of S E N were at the meeting, as well as a handful of people who were op­ posed to the group’s desire to dose the exit. As was the case at a June meeting, council members told the group of neighbors that they would not close off the exit, nor wodd they ask the Mmnesola Depa.tment of Transportation (MnDOT) to do so. And, the council also s;»id it would not lake S.E N. up on its latest proposal to have the city pay for a study to determine whether the 130-foot exit ramp is safe “This IS something that is totally controlled and governed by the slate." said Coun- cilmember Bob Murphy. “It’s out of our hands.'* And. as was the case after the June meeting, the residents of the area said they have only begun to fight. “I'm disappointed in the coun­ cil because we re a large p.»rt of ibe citv.‘* said Sieve Young, of Divi.si’on Street "Hut this dtHMi'l iman we’ll give up We're just getting going.” The members of the group say they ’re going to continue work­ ing with MnDOT officiaLs to try and get the exit closed. Or. they at least want someone to acknolwedge that the exit is not a safe one At previous council meetings in which the residents had siwken. Cindy Sluder led the wav for the group liul at .Monday s meeting, several speakers presented SEN’S case “You refer to us as Cindy Sluder s group.” said Chene EXCELSIOR Gordon, of Third Av enue “She's sUU one of our representatives, but we’ve become much more than that. We had a meeting m which 44 people attended.” Gordon asked if the council would consider gelling together in a meeting with MnDOT and the neighbors. “We keep heanng from the ci­ ty that It’s MnDOT’s problem.” she said. ".And we hear from MnDOT that it’s the city’s pro­ blem. We want to get ail sides together and figure this out ' Wlien council members said they only have the power to ask MnDOT to consider c las mg the exit, the residents asked why Koberl Dixon, a dislncl super­ visor with MnDOT, had written a letter stating that the city could close the e.xil if it wanted to. As Gordon read a letter from Dixon in which the MnDOT of­ ficial said the slate is m favor of having cities closing off unsafe exits, Murphy began laughmg. “Is tliere somelhmg funny here?” Gordon and several others asked Murphy. Earlier. Murphy had said that because MnDOT is in a budget- crunch. it would love to have cities close up exits on state highways. “Of course it would be at the expense of the cities,” Muprhy said John Chrislme. of S E.N., ask­ ed council members if they realized that the exit was unsafe and that cars exiting onto Divi- sion Street cannot see fxHiestnans or other cars ui the neigliUnhaxl. And Young askwl if council membeiN were aware that MnDOT rii oimr.ends licit exits bucli a.-5 the one on Ili^’.hwav 7 Iv at least 3U) feet long, He also said the recommendtxi stopping dLstance for a car traveling W mph IS l‘A3 feel “Did yixj know that exit is on­ ly 130 fcxfl long”’ Young said ' But City Manager Carl Zieman said many exits on Highway 7 don’t meet MnlXl’P’s requirements •Tlieir bpixifications change ail the lime. ■ Mayor John Anderson said “Tliey’re res^xm- sible for changing them We don t want this to gel mtoa com- muiulv against die city type of dung. We’re irv mg to work with you and hav. jone a lot for your neighhorhiXKi ” Several residents from Linden Street and a business owner, Ann Kenger, spoke against clos­ ing the exit. “I wanted to mention that JX) people signed a petition agamst closmg the exit. ” said Jack Kerr, of Linden Street. "The question is whether this will solve the problem of traffic on Stxond Avenue People will just exit on (Thristmas l.ake Road and go back through your neight»rhood. Some of us see this as an inconvemence.” Bea Kinghom, also of Linden Street, said she often sees children piaymg ui the street on Second Avenue “I don't think that's safe,” she said “Right now when 1 drive ta Excelsior. I have one mile. But if this is closed. I’ll have two miles. Also, the police say there are no major accidents there.” THE MOST VALUABLE COMMODITY'S INFORMATION Alter years cf providing extraordinary research for industry, the INSTITUTE is proud to oiler its services to you. the consuiiKr! Our expertise is now accessible to individuals who want to raise their ‘‘quality of life”. It is our goal to provide you with U.e best informaaon available. There arc no “miracle methods ” or "quick fixes”. We offer you practical informa- uon and proven methods that will make the “system” work for you. 1 I I I CM I I > VM l* \V H)K you OK \ OUR CHII IVS KUUCMION CoUcgc-Universiiy -Trade School Grants and scholarships are available through the government if you know how lo Cind them and qualify! Certain dcaJlmc/rcsinc* uuns nuy apply. Cl IMIIIM. im l ouroicv IK I ADIll K IlKK XklNO mm K <.H I HK t.l A.VS CHI LMi If your talents are over-looked or you feel stalled by artificial hamers. ihcrc arc opuons! Successful executives have the aii-swcrs. U‘s not safe to travel in the U S. anymore, maybe not even in your own hometown. The only proicciion you have is knowing how c^lL lohcavicunj^ The job morVcl and the skills required are changing dr.tmalically. W'ill you Ik : employable live years from now? 4J Mil.I.ION I'Kon.l AKK IM)IN«. I I \NO anuhavk noimkniionoi - MOITIM.! Home-based businesses. Tt\c answer to income, flexibility and freedom. It's easier than you think! What arc they and how do you get suirtcd? MN \NUAL INDHT NIIKNCK I IIKntt.H tTU h' How to get involved and succeed in the fjxtcsi growing mulu-billion doUar indusiry. lUNUl.INti ANU SICHCVGK OF TOXIC MAIKKIAI-S Raduuoii leakage, chemical seepage imo groundwaier and misuse of landfills arc hazards Uui aifcci us all. Be informed! ntOTCCT YOURSEtr mOM CUNTON-S -/.i.iTAXOUNUKS Prepare now or pay laicr. Can >t)u afford not to have this infonnauon? S lARI YOUR SUCCESS S l ORV NOW Indicate die one(s) vou waniiQjLllBB E1E10® At $18 each and send lo. AMERICAN RESEARCH & DATA INSTITUTE Howard Hughes Center 66(11 Center Dnve West • 5th Root, Depanment W-2: • 1 '>5 Angeles. CA tXXMS S.iusfaction Guaranteed or Your.Money U.iJt I u CTT7 JOHN W. PLOETZ ARorn«y at Law LAW OFFICES MORRIS, FULLER & SEAVER, P.A. A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION SUITE 525 SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTRE 6600 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55435 I ✓t TELEPHONE (612) 927-0615 lEuECOPIER (612) 927-8752 Real Property Specialist Certified by the Minnesota St )te Bar Association August 26, 1993 AUG 3 0 1993 Ji a] W a No. 1843 a Proposed Eight Lot Earl Fischer THREE STAR TRUCKING COMPANY 18025 County Road 6 Plymouth, MN 55446 Jean Maybush CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: City of Orono Zoning File Subdivision Our File No. 16868 Dear Mr. Fischer and Ms. Maybush: Our office has been retained by Mr. John Hallson to resolve certain issues and concerns he has regarding the aforementioned proposed subdivision. As you may know Mr. Hallson is the fee owner of a parcel of land directly west of the proposed subdivision. Mr. Hallson's main concerns focus on the location of any proposed roadway to be dedicated in the aforementioned plat. Mr. Hallson's property is currently unplatted but Mr. Hallson contemplates platting said property at sometime in the future. Mr. Hallson's concerns focus on the proposed roadway location in the proposed plat which it may limit his ability to plat his existing property into three conforming lots, if the proposed road in the proposed plat would be required to the extended by the City through a future plat of Mr. Hallson*s property. Mr. Hallson would set forth the following alternative proposals to remedy his concerns: 1. Mr. Hallson would include his property in the proposed plat currently before the City of Orono Planning Commission so that the location of any proposed roadway might be mutually agreed upon by all parties concerned. Mr. Hallson would be willing to pay a pro rata portion of the costs and expenses for the platting of the ^Droposed plat as mutually agreed upon by all parties. or; Mr. Fischer and Ms. Maybush August 26, 1993 Page 2 2. Execution of a Mutual agreement by and between the City of Orono, Three Star Trucking Company and Mr. Hallson regarding the location of the proposed street. In conjunction with this alternative I enclose three sketches setting forth proposed locations for continuation of the roadway set forth in the proposed plat which would best meet Mr. Hallson's needs. After reviewing the aforementioned proposal please feel free to contact my office with any further questions or concerns regarding this matter. It is my understanding that this matter is set to be heard before a Planning Commission Meeting scheduled for September 20, 1993. Very truly yours# n □r~orn CD CD ^ • CD ID LH UJ Ui LD CD O O O O T) n T)n t) > i '"■—-■- - - - - - - - - prcposaI 2 Nx\ DroDosai !ot3 uDLDENVIEW DR. I ot □ I ot 1 HALLSDN \ \ J TO: FROM: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:September 17, 1993 SUBJECT: <^1862 Three Star Trucking, 2590 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - R. Suers, Jr.’s Letter and Exhibits 8/20/93 E - John W. Ploetz U*tter (J. Hallson ’s Attorney, plus E.xliibits) F - Survey of Adjacent Residence G - Current Road Layout H - Gustafson Report 9/12/93 I - Planning Commission Action Notice - Sketch Plan Review Application #1843 J - Wetland Map K - Existing Drainage Patter L - Watershed Map M - Comp Plan Sections N - Subdivision Sections Dealing witli Rural Road Development O - Lot 7 with Future Road Corridor Designated and Re-designation of Building Envelope P - Staff Sketches of Options of Development with Seven Lot Plat Q - Preliminary Subdivision Applicant proposes a Class III Subdivision of eigh^ :Ots. The application involves the dedication of public roadway, the creation of a private road with potential extension to west, ponding areas for drainage purposes and drainage facilities (i.e., berm to control development runoff, swales, etc.). The proposed subdivision was reviewed as a sketch plan review at the July Planning Commission meeting. Please review Exhibit I, the Planning Commission action notice that summarized the direction received from tlie Planning Commission at the time ot that review. 1 ne following ordinances are pertinent for this review: Chapter 11, specifically the sections dealing with Class III Subdivisions, review Exhibit N, Section 11.10, Subdivision 21 (C); Section 11.32, Subdivisions 2, 4 and 6: Section 11.32, Subdivision 2 (B-6); Section 11.32, Subdivision 2; Section 11.33, Subdivision 4; Typical Section 11.40, Subdivision 3; Section 11.62, Parks and Playgrounds of the Class II and III Subdivisions specifically Park Dedication Fee; Section 10.28 - RR-IB Zoning District Standards. < 1 ,0 1 •1 • t •—- • y _ _. '' i 1 <n ta 1 a«•a 1 - i» » C S 1 1 (M» 1 dP STit-c k 1 ^ !* « * .4 .’n s? r>•1 I 1 j » ^ 1 ! 1, * 1 ,0 ..45> (£5) 2 ^ (»i I •• i (fTp % A • « <~* ItCOOuvO^ C* •• A«p I ® TitH (2^ 3 Ji^ *r«r t I |P /^m t —• - I •• ~ ■ J 7 I .- ■ I '.^ ■„ , ! ? I • . • diP , ^CCX iDM\ 2 iw I fui dP ' ^ ^ t* « Ml i «ii <S5, ;- * (£5> ^ • ^ o s *»i * tn» on f ly «' • ■ ««*«• r f I J *\ JTZ i""® ,4)J i 'fevi#ii inj ^ 2 f» ^ r75Trr 5^!!l lasr, :;i js5 ‘ !»•—ip on. . ^ * •* “ lu * I %«r H"* •; I. * • • • V , w* M.. M • 4 • • A* #■/ .V ( 1 ___(®._...» .'UIM «a ______________1 ____ -_ M f ________i— :___________j___________:______ L 1 • J •.-••44 /?- -If 1 1 I • <i . 11 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects September 12. 1993 Cno Cj 9of>e«roo W Rosens PE • C ArxJp'ik Pi M.rviM L P£ £ Turr^' **£ Glenn 8 Cook P£ Thomas E \cve» P£ Pohe't G S<hun<hf Pfc Susjn M Ete^ <• C PA •Sergey Corujitjryt HCW jf'J A Sjoftvrj <»£ icetfh A Gouon P£ Pcoen 8 PvPe»e P£ w fo\re^ PF O Lo^w■^J P£ SOOrn C PuMe* A 1 * Jerry A Bourdon P£ Mark A Hanum PE > Rautmarfr- Pf TeJ K f e^j P£ ■•^homas ff Arx)fr«?n A f A Uona»d C BurdanJi PE frvvT'as £ AnguV PE Ismael Md^ ryr/ P£ Vjchae« P Rau PE \^r>es V ^MCP Ph*MO J Pyne Pi T*\yrj\ w Pfrervyi PE M«rr>aet C lynch P£ R VdiaM P£ Je'rv O PE Scott J Argar'ek. PE kermeth P Arjerson P£ Mark P «?oA PE v*art k Seo. P£ Gary '.V Morierr PE OarNkM j Ejgrton P£ A Pck Schm.^ pf Ph.iip J Casvc* ^ P£ Mark O Viai's P£ M.es B }^r\e'} PE t Phiiiio Graver P£ Mien L 'A emen »£ G.»r> D KrtUiyL*. PE F 'uOO *»f kath P >aoo 4. Doogiat J Benevt P£ Shay^n O GuMJf^on Pi Cec io O ve» *»£ Paul G Meue* PE John P Goroef PE Charier A E -s on Leo M Pawvn'«k^ Hjflan M OfV'ri ia'*-s F Engeir.a'Ct ft Ms. Jeanne A. .Mabuslli, Building and Zoning Administrator Citv of Orono « Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bav. Minnesota 5.^323 Re; riirec Star Trucking Subdivision File No. 139-1862 ^ SEP 1 5 ;^993 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the preliminaiy plat and grading plan for Tliree Star Trucking located north of Watertown Road in the Southeast Quarter ot the Southeast Quarter of Section 33. There are several issues that need to be addressed regarding the grading, drainage, and pond design for the subdivision. Tlie drainage for this property is an important issue due to the fact that much of the runoff currently drains easterly through the developed properties in the Daniels Long Lake Heights Addition. The drainage swale along the east property’ line must be lowered to control the runoff yvithin the subdivision. We recommend extending the 1020 conlour 50 feet to the south and providing a 1021 elevation at the southeast property corner. This allows a 0.5% grade on the ditch while keeping it lower than Lots 12 and 13 in the Daniel ’s Long Lake Heights Addition. The ditches along the cul-de-sac and Watertown Road must be set at least 2.5 feet below the proposed centerline street grade. Because the alternate septic site on Le)i 7 is shown at elevatior. 1027, the high w.ater level of the existing pond on Lot 8 should be 1024. An outlet ditch should Ire provided for the pond to set the normal water level at 1023.5. Calculations for the site runoff before and after development should be provided. The proposed culvert sizes and grades should be shown on the plan. The proposed holding pond shown on Lot 4 should be designed with an outlet control to store a 100 year rainfall event with a restricted outflow. Calculations should be provided whicli show the pond volume, high water 'evel and peak flows. The plans should be sent to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed for their approval. 'Hie proposed cul-de-Stic is approximately 1000 feet in length which's the maximum 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 I ■ Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth September 12, 1993 Page -2- length allowed for a residential public street. We recomnu-iul that the street be connected to Golden View Drive, through the undeveloped portion of Hallson Estates, to provide a looped street and a more integrated street system for this area. The new street should be constructed in accordance with City Standards. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. r/ Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. I CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE ;?1843 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: July 28. 1993 TO: Mr. and Mrs. Robert Suess 2590 Watertown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES:Three Star Trucking Company Attn; Earl Fischer 18025 County Road 6 Plymouth, MN 55446 Mark Gronberg 482A Tamarack Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Sketch Plan of an 8-Lot Subdivision DATE OF MEETING; 7/19/93 VOTE: No Vote Required of the Planning Commission The Planning Commission had the following comment? concerning your proposed 8-lot subdivision: 1. 1 • Grading/Drainage. Applicant is asked to meet with the City staff and consultants prior to developing preliminary grading and drainage plans. Grading plans are being requested with the filing of the preliminary plat because of the potential impact on the dry buildable envelopes of certain lots. Staff shall review the issue of crediting land within the drainage and utility easeme::ts along the east side of the plat. All lot areas must be exclusive of the areas of road right-of-way and retention ponds. The grading plan should address how applicant will design berms and swales along east lot line directing drainage to the northeast per the enclosed City Engineer report of July 13, 1993. Disregard section that asks that drainage from Lot 1 and part of Lot 2 be directed to south of Watertown Road. Applicant should be advised that drainage improvements required lor your subdivision are not designed to deal with drainage problem of Ilackberry Hill neighborhood. The drainage improvements requireu tor your plat address the need to detain or retain runoff from the develoment of your property. Access/Road. All lots to be served by the private road. No additional curb cuts will be allowed onto Watertown Road. The City will ask for an extension to the west connecting with Golden View Dri^'e. In preliminary discussions with John llallson, the owner of Lot 2, Hallson Estates, he notes preference for a connecting link along the northern border of the property. Staff will di.scuss the issue of a future western connection outlot at the time of our meeting. i 4 Notice of Planning Commission A tion July 28, 1993 Page 2 3. Please understand that it has been a longstanding planning policy of the City to create private roads with connecting links that need not be developed until City deems it necessarj' to create through roads. This w'as reintorced when Woodhaven Drive was to be connected to Silver View Drive through an undeveloped connecting outlot and with Golden View’s connection to Silver View. The roads shall remain as private roads until through roads are created. Septic Te.sting. Septic test infonnation must be submitted with preliminary plat. Applicant should determine if original test infonnation submitted for proposed Lots 1 and 2 will still be applicable. 4. The preliminary plan must provide the following information: a. b. c. d. e. f. Building envelopes as shown on sketch plan. Retention pond/swale and berm areas. The lots along east lot line within the Daniels Long Lake Heights plat. Northern lot of Hallson Estates on west side. Road as outlot with another separate outlot for future extension to west Locate temporary cul-de-sac. 5. Preliminary plat application fee: a. Preliminary plat application $500.00 $325.00 -h $25.00/lot (7 x $25) b. Private road improvement fee is based as follows: $600.00 + $.50/___ lineal feet of roadway. The length of road should be based on the location of the temporary cul-de-sac. c. Septic fee Total fee $350.00 ($100.00 may be deducted if original septic testing for Lots 1 and 2 prove to be acceptable). Fee is based on $50.00 per each new lot. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any questions pertaining to the directives noted above. Please contact the City offices (473-7357) to arrange for the required pre-tilmg meeting with both staff and consulting staff. - j- *y M HO ■>^ ^ *3i -’V ' > • !V£i-”ss-?i . ,T?ooo; i'l"' ■ T rt?3^r". ^is (- W2? c-m Lmm.wv.ii i ^•7 MV 3> *. Ld *• V “?i. Wi ' ; —. T 5.'&:1^*s:T^ :;/■■ #%>•-■ ..i' ^>^5? ri§,^ '. t? p -y- ! f a: »‘.,'«'!v7. W>v- tc.^ •* ^ L. r . t ^ T *- *i*_ ^' • 117'. ■• * ,it‘ ■V3 /. -**c ■* ^•«».. •— • 3M. 3-. •“if L^ T'O) 22lfc^ - —* ^#lB. _____r 4 ■“ '.U •^8 ,\ < ‘‘ - ^ '• ■ (?5 ‘1':' -‘ '•ir M-. . vil • • “ ' M«« ->«, i ‘ ;|§ » F’- ^-r ; <N %%JLO v o#? 1 ».. * 9k « •—f- r:»P-"p^*: x *. -!.%..• • , --••• *‘, ^ 'T ; . ♦ .' M>,-.i5r.•'•.v »:»gBQ£ ^ ••, ■^ . ♦ •> *•' * . ,, • I .w • • . - • ♦ *: t-m. rt.v * ,. * •.-••’i.. _ - • •• -I V * .• • % • . 4 /%• ^•m'. - -« »V • ..-.-r^V : ivies'; ;J^-4*'. - -*W • I ^ ' * ^ * .'; 1 * V. ■ ’*i * « ,. 1 -f ^ ♦». ..• ^.. • * Ik. 4% •« 4 •* • •* * ' ■ '• ^:'M- ^i''- . J.- * -• ..••.*..5,-s • 1, : 'k . •'•. « . . ."fc; . w . .4'/L : • ' ? .:4.^*4-- mV V' ^4 it/i ^ r: ,•: i V;.■■' :■,•%■■•.•ti-'/*:'-- '■ •i ■ . .4 ■• -•■-• • W„ ft " ■“ ^iiSr”fc *r* • ‘ •■^«--^**‘-'i- ,|.,--i^<p-<.^*.M,. r>r^ • w.. Ai.orf 'V > ' * * ■* w> 2>- 4 (6)Cl r.’O r*r> 17 ’)c fV* f J * ' ..•-4 . « s- MAPbf • L A -Kir ■Km ■ f:' r Ir>:^^.A.-. J--.• 4*. «> •*•! m •i 4'-- l* ' ~ ^ - I? ■ IT9.;.- w ''^'. ___ei«s*v: ■ r - if^ - >^1,^ 1 «r*. *» - f *» % •. i % \ ■ ■i •^ ■3*;i?» (■<^••j5 >.• / * !^WAT£n^Tv r ^:w;'cjj..-_ ,_i-4c-; '->. '^ ’ • iTrCr. -rv<» ^ J46:: V !•' ujrSET: * •«» .i***-—.*- ^ I •*WM-4 •••■'’ V'^*”*- * "1 M - .*U. Mf . *.*# • • :---4 * • r • - ‘ • • P£ S- ’ ■ •• ‘ ’ .^tSr"* .“•r.’.w .-• -‘ » Tx r:-;:: /r/ \ ^Ci4i) e G.4 M TRANSPORTATION JUNE, 1980 THE CITY'S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MUST REINFORCE THE LAND USi:. PLAN. One of the basic functions of the transportation plan is to reinforce the development policies and the resultant land use >jlans of the city. In Orono, this means reinforcing the permanent urban/rural land use goals. This means providing sufficient capacity for trips between Orono*s residential neighborhoods and the commercial centers of Navarre and other lake area municipalities as well as the metropolitan area to the east of Orono. As a practical matter, this means little or no need for expansion of any highways or roads in the city in the future. HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS HAVE RESULTED IN A CIT^ WHICH IS PARTIALLY URBAN AND PARTIALLY RURAL. Development patterns established 100 years ago are responsible for the dual personality that characterizes Orono. The urban areas provide higher density housing opportunities and all of the neighborhood services necessary to support the residents of the City, urban and rural alike. The rural areas provide areas for low density housinq and quasi-agricultura1 activities. The lifestyles are different, the needs and desires of the citizens are different and the requirements for public services are different. ORONO IS PARTLY IN THE METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA AND P.ARTLY IN THE RURAL SERVICE AREA. The Metropolitan Council has established a MUSA line that rings the Twin Cities separatinq urban and rural areas. Within the MUSA area, metropolitan facilities, including more extensive transportation systems, will be provided for urban development- Outside the MUSA area, developed density is expected to be low and metropolitan facilities and capacities will not be provided. Map No. 6 indicates the actual location of the boundary between the Urban Service Prea and the Rural Service Area as it passes through Orono. URBAN AND RURAL NEIGHBORHOODS REQUIRE DIFFERING LEVELS OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES. The urban aroa5; cf Orono have sufficient density to^ require and to financially support, municipal services such as .i typi-a urban roadway network. The rural areas, on the other hand, have limite density and h.ave environmental restraints prohibiting urban density encroachments. The planned rural densities do not require extensive public roadway systems nor can these rural densities support any type o mass transit system. CMP 7-3 J TRANSPORTATION.JUNE, 1980 ORONO'S TRAIL SYSTEM PROVIDES RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AS KELL AS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES. As part of our recreation-open space plan. Orono is proposing an extensive road-side bike-hike trail linking the conmercial area of Navarre with Spring Park. Tonka Bay (and Excelsior) Wayzata, Long Lake and most of Orono’s urban neighborhoods. Besides offering walking and bicycle recreation, this trail system provides a.i excellent local alternative to auto travel between home and shopping or friends. In addition, the DNR's Luce Line Trail provides extended east-west linkage between several other cities and between several of Orono's north-south bike trails. Taken together, these trails provide a cohesive network of alternative local transportation routes. ORONO'S AIR TRANSPORTATION INVOLVEMENT IS LIMITED TO SEAPLANE OPERATION ON LONG LAKE AND LAKE MINNETONKA. Orono is not within any metropolitan airports search area and Orono is not within the normal landing or takeoff flight pattern of any regular airport. .Maple Plain has a small field south of that City used by private planes that may fly over north­ west Orono on one runway pattern, but there is no adverse effect from the current usage level and the location is such that there are no special land use or height restrictions necessary. All of Lake Minnetonka is open for sea plane usage except for the restricted bays of French Lake, Forest Lake and Tanager Lake. Sea plane usage has been generally very limited although the potential for conflicts on crowded bays does exist. The most crit.ical problem to date, however, has been one of noise associated with sea p.lane takeoffs at odd hours. This has been occasional enough so*as not to wai'rant any significant policy formation in this Plan. ROADWAY MAINTENANCE CONCERNS ARE PERHAPS THE MOST SIGNIEICANT FACTOR IN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR ORONO. Every level of government has been increasingly faced with skyrocketing road maintenance problems. Initial c o n n t r u c t i o n c o n t *3 a r o i cj n i f i c a n t , but t e m a i n t c n a n c c problem is never ending. Vehicle weights have been incrcasing , speed has been increasing, and winter safety solutions have caused rapid deterioration of roadway surfaces and bridges. At the same time, maintenance budgets are c -..aped by inflation, the rapidly r.ising cost of asphalt, and limit-d maintenance fund income. This crunch is most severe at the oca level where levy-limitations prevent the hiring o.f sufficient maintenance crews or the replacement of well-used equipment. Thus, the planning concerns for new roadways include not only the initial cost-benefit question, but also ‘■.he worry about spreading future main-enance capa i i y beyond the reach of limited crews or limited budgets. CMP 7-7 fU TRANSPORTATION JUNE, 1980 G' 5. RURAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WILL UTILIZE PRIVATE ROAD FEEDERS TO SUPPLEMENT THE EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD GRID. Because of topocraphical limitations, the historic shape of rural land divisions, and the low density of rural land use, most now rural residential lots best preserved Ly r.horc dead-end roads running off the existing street system. The low number of dwellings on each road, the dead-end configuration and the scattered road locations make public roadway maintenance excessively costly compared to any public benefit. Therefore, most new rural lots will be directly served by privately owned and maintained roadways. New public streets will be accepted where a "through" configuration provider a general public benefit and/or where the number of residences justifies public maintenance expense. PRIVATE RURAL ROADWAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO RURAL DESIGN STANDARDS. The City will regulate private road design standards to ensure environmental protection and adequate all- weather access to all properties. The type and width of road surface required will vary with the number of residences to be served and hence the amount of expected vehicle usage. The length of dead-end roads will be limited for public safety purposes. THE CITY WILL GUAR.ANTEE REASONABLE MAINTEN.ANCE LEVELS AND PUBLIC ACCESS ON ALL PRIVATE ROADS. In the process of approving rural subdivisions, the City will acquire underlying public ingress, egress, and access easements over all private roads. These easements will ensure legal access of the public to all properties served by the private road. Development contracts backed by acceptable forms of financial r e spon i hi 1 i t y will assure that all private roads are designed and constructed according tc City- approved standards and specifications. The City will further guarantee that all private roads are maintained to reasonable standards at all times through required maintenance agreements and/or homeowner's associations, and that failure of the private group to so maintain their private road will be cause for the City to accomplish needed maintenance and to assess the benefitted properties for the direct cost of such maintenance. © CMP 7-12 ©TRANSPORTATION JUNE, 1980 6.THE CITY WILL PURSUE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE-HIKE TRAIL FACILITIES. The completion of an interconnected bike-hike trail system is important to the further­ ance of alternative transportation incentives. The City will encourage Hennepin County to speedily implement the planned bike-hike trail system along several county roads. The separation of bicycle and pedestrian traffic from vehicular traffic is of the utmost importance in accident prevention. 7.THE CITY WILL PROMOTE IMPROVED MASS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS. Orono has established a Park and Ride Transit System. Orono encourages improv .d bus scheduling and improv’ed service, especially at off-peak hours. Orono strongly supports the "Tonkamobile" program and encourages expansion to provide improved ExceIsior-Wayzata sef'ice via Orono's North Shore neighborhoods. RURAL TRANSPORTATION POLICIES UBLIC STREETS IN THE RURAL AREA WILL BE PRIMARILY LIMITED TO THE EXISTING COLLECTOR AND ARTERIAL GRID SYSTEM. The low rural land use density does not require nor can it economically support an extensive public street system. Rural lot arrangements have always been served by the existing grid streets and are capable of subdivision to the planned rural density without requiring additional public street investments. 2.THE RING ROUTE CONCEPT UTILIZES AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE THE EXISTING RURAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM. ' The principal corridor for traffic from Minnetrista and points west utilizes Hennepin County Roads No. 6 and 19 and State Highway 12. The City of Orono has constructed a key link between County Roads 6 and 19. Additional ring route traffic uses the existing north-south collector roads to travel away from the Lake toward these principal tr'.vel routes. 3.THE CITY OF ORONO WILL ENCOURAGE ALL NECESSARY ROAD SURFACE AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE AND TO FACILITATE THROUGH TRAFFIC ON THE RING ROUTE. This will include cooperation with the City of Long uake in accommodating traffic on Highway 12. CMP 7-11 L l\/V \ w « TRANSPORTATION J ’JNE, 198 0 t f L PUBLIC TRANSPOPTATJON $ERVJ££.S MAP NO 15 INDICATES THE EXISTING EXTENT OF PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE IN ORONO.' The most frequent service is prc/ided on Shoreline Drive through Che neart of the Navarre commercial area and closest to the greatest number of Orono's urban residents. Commuter frequency service is provided through the remainder of Orono’s urban area and the experimental service provides flexible-route service to local urban neighborhoods. EXISTING RAIL FACILITIES PROVIDE THE POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE PUBLIC TRANSIT .AND FOR FUTURE INDUSTRIAL FREIGHT SERVICE. The branch rail 1 ne through southern Orono once had frequent passenger service to Minr.eapolis and has the potential for renewed service as a part of a region-wide alternative light-rail transportation system. The main rail 1ine through nor :hern Orono has immediate potential for providing direct rail freight service the Orono Industrial Park should such service ever be desired by one or mor6 of the industries located there. THE PROPOSED RECREATIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM OFFERS AI'^ERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES. The complete bike-hike and rtcreational trail system is desc’-ibed in Chapter 8 and is shown on Map No. 16. These trails provi e a coordinated alternative to auto transportation for local trips by almost all Orono residents. ypFCTED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS. NO MAJOR CHANGES OR IMPROVEMENTS ARE EXPECTED IN ORONO"S PUBLIC STREET SYSTEM. The existing public road grid system is properly locate an o adequate capacity to serve all of Orono's expected rural developments without new public street requirements. New rural residential eveiopmen are expected to rely entirely on private roads where new access is requir by new lot arrai»genont s . in the urban area, a few short local street extensions may occur within the next ten years. Map No. 11 indicates forecast urban deve opmen in three locations each of which will probably be served by a new public street cul-de-sac. Nw new urban collector capacity will be required because of the limited number of dwellings in these developments. Orono's major forecast street improvement was the construction of Road as a link in the Ring Route between County Road 6 and ^oun y This entirely new road is expected to be completely finished ear y summer of I960.a V"L I CMP 7-18 c TRANSPORTATIOfi JUNE, 1980 8. 9. DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS AND RURAL STREET OR PRIVATE ROAD INTERSECTIONS WILL BE LIMITED FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY. Rural traffic speed is generally faster than that in urban neighborhoods requiring greater sight distances and a lesser number cf intersection conflicts for the same degree of traffic safety. Joint use of carefully located private roads will generally be pj^gferjfed over direct access onto public highways from separate properties. RURAL TRAILS ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE TOTAL ALTERNATE TRANSFORATION SYSTEM. Rural trails offer access to the Hennepin County Park Reserve Lands from all areas of the City. Rural trails offer horseback riding as well as walking and bicycle opportunities. The City will encourage completion of the planned bike—hike trail system and the private development of rural trails connecting the public trail system with individual rural properties. The City will continue to restrict motorized use of trails within Orono as inappropriate to the trail's basic purpose and as incompatible with adjacent residential properties. THE CITY WILL NOT PROMOTE MASS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR RURAL ORONO. The planned rural land use density cannot economically support public transit services. Existing bus routes pass through the rural area enroute between Long Lake, Wayzata and urban Orono. These routes are sufficient to serve Orono's rural needs and will in fact provide additional rural service as the need for additional urban service increases. No new route locations are necessary as rural residents desiring to use transit services will use the established park and ride locations in Navarre and Wayzata. CMP 7-13 H y; \ V i <■ .r.r^V - f § 11.10 A. Improvements. All public and/or private improvements required "by the City to be completed by the subdivider prior to Final Plat approval, shall be fully completed and shall have had a certificate" of satisfactory completion issued by the City Engineer prior to endorsement of the Final Plat by the City. All oubiic and/or private improvements required by the City to be completed by the subdivider after Final Plat approval shall be fully set forth in a subdivider's agreement to be executed prior to Final Subdivision approval. All local streets in subdivisions sgwer and water are not available shall be private unless otherwise approved by the City at preliminary subdivision approval. City reserves the right to determine whether a road is to bo public or private in all areas of the City. 3. Public Roads. Public streets and roads will be required to be platted, constructed and dedicated to the City when reauired by the Council consistent with the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the City staff and the established oractices and design standards. Public roads shall be completed and issued a certificate of satisfactory completion by the City Engineer orior to Final Plat approval or, when specifically authorized"by the Council, shall be subject to the conditions of a subdivider's agreement to be executed prior to Final Plat approval. ./ /C.^y Private Roads. When the P r e 1 i m inar y P la t has been approved "on the basis of a private access road providing the only access to three or more lots, the private road shall be identified on the Final Plat as a separate outlot. The private road shall be identified by name if the road serves four or more lots. Whenever a private road outlot is proposed, the subdivider shall be required to provide for a permanent home own e r s association or road maintenance agreement acceptable to the City in order to insure ownership and maintenance of the road outlot. D. Road and Utilities Easements. The Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and/or City staff, require the subdivider to convey to the City certain utilities easements permitting public ingress, egress ard access over private roads as a condition of Final Subdivision approval. 1. Whene^'cr a private access road is authorized, the required outlot shall be included on and conveye in a road and utilities easement in the standard City form. 2. Whenever areas of the plat are to be set aside for public or private utility construction and sai areas shall be described and dedicated for public use on the p . This shall include areas shown on record plat drawings as rain<g and utilities easements". i«?3. Whenever a road and utilities required, the easement shall be fully execuced prior to ^ chaii approval using the legal descriptions of the r inal ^r?r•o^>Ar^v tKreafter be filed in the chain of title of the property concurrent with the filing of the Final Plat. (4-1-84)ORONO CC 442 ’ •;rV' § 11.32 safptv and welfare of the citi2ens presently using the roadway and sSftabte perlofn-fnce boL \o conplate tbe improvements in the cubdivider's agreement. 3 Access to Imoroved Public Roadways Over Existing Priv-te Roadways* Wherever the*area to be subdivided is to utilize Pristine private roadwav in order to gam access to the public ^calway. Inch private roadway shall be suitably improved as provided herein above for public roadways. Subd. 2. On-Site Roadways A Gradina and Improvement Plan. Roadways shall be nr^ried and impro'ved to conform to the City’*-' construction standards graded and impro^ r-hall be approved as to design and specifi-and specrficatron. and shall be construction planrrequired to be submitted prior to final subdivision approval. B, Topography and Arrangement. 1 Roadways shall be related appropriately to =~=s 1 UliC W J.i * —- - - - 2 All streets shall be properly integrated d‘ll’=a\‘’ed 7i^^hV-o’f-tat "a^^rsfablY/heT i°n t^^ Colp'rVh^nstee Municipal Plan. to specific traffic 9ene r^toTs" suc^^^^^^^ districts, schools, churches, and f^'^f^^^^nrproposed land uses, dt'nsities; and to the pattern of e^xisting P P v/l. Roadways shall be laid out to co^fotm as much as possible to the topography, systems , and totraffic, to permit efficient drainage and utllity^^yste^^^ require the minimum number of roadw y convenient and safe access to property necessarily be adh^lVd U-shaped roadways shall be encouraged where «- a more desirable layout. ORONO CC 457 (4-1-84) L.r_t r^LSlLJ N § 11.32 6. Cul-de-sacs shall be discouraged; proposed roadways shall be ex tended to the bounde ry lines of the tract to be subdivided, unless prevented by topography or other physical condi- j-Qj. unl0ss in the ooinion of the City such extension is not necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision with the existing layout or the most advantageous future development of adjacent tracts. 7. In business and industrial developments, the roadwavs and other accessway? shall be planned in connection vy" £th *"he grouoinQ ot buildings, location of rail facilities, and the*provisions* of' alleys, truck loading and maneuve"ing areas, and walks and parking a'eas so as to minimize conflict of movemen\_ between the various types of traffic, including pedestrian, C. Blocks. orovide for two 1. (2) Blocks shall have sufficient width to tiirs of lots of appropriate depths. Exceotions to this piesciibed block width shall be permitted in blocks adjacent to arterial roadways, railroads, or waterways. 2. The lengths, widths, and shapes of blocks shall be such as are appropriate for the locality and the type of development contemplated, but block lengths in residential areas shall not exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500) feet or we ve (12) times the minimum lot width required in the zoning district, nor be less than foi.r hundred (400) feet in length from centerline to centerline of adjacent streets. Wherever practicable, blocks along arterials collector roadways shall be not less than one thousand (1,000) feet in length. 3 In all blocks the City shall require the the City through the center of blocks more than eight hundred (80 ) feet long whure deemed essential to prcvido circulation of access to schools, playgrounds, shopping centers, Shall becommunity facilities. Blocks designed for industrial uses shall be of such length and width as may be determined suitable by the City for prospective use. D. Access to Primary Arterials. Where a subdivision borders on or contains an existing arteric-.l, the City may require that access to such toadways be limited by one of the following means: 1 The subdivision of lots so as to back onto Sr ifte'pTo^v r/-'e be provided in a strip of land along the rear property line of such lots. 0 ’’i0N0 CC 458 (4-1-84) •t •»! » nr I V % ' «. .*1 * <'.r § 11.32 2. A series of cul-de-sacs, U-shaped streets, or short loops entered from and designed generally at right angles to such a parallel street, with the rear lines of their terminal lots backing onto the arterial. 3. A marginal access or service road separated from the arterial by* a planting or grass strip and having access thereto at suitable points. ” Road Names and Street Addresses. The sketch plan as submitted ‘ shal1 not indicate any names upon proposed streets The City shall name all toads at the time of preliminary subdivision aoproval and assian street addresses. The local costaiaster shall be consulted by the Zoning Administrator. Names shall be sufficiently different in sound and in spelling from other road names in the area so as not to cause confusion. A road whic.n is or is planned as a continuation of an existing road shall bear the same name. F. Road Regulatory Signs. The subdivider shall deposit with theCity at the time of final subdivision approval the sum of money as determined by the City for each installation cost thereof. The City shall install all road cigns before issuance of certificates of occupancy for the streets approved. The City shall place all signs at developer's expense at all inter sections wichin or abutting the subdivision, the type and location of which to be approved by the City. G. Reserve Strips. The creation of reserve strips shall not be permitted adjacent to a proposed street in such a manner as to deny access from adjacent property to such street. H. Construction of Roads and Dead—c<nd Roads. y. 1 Construction of Roads. The arrangement of accordance with the City Comprehensive Municipal Plan If_the adjacent property is undeveloped and the , , to the propertv liL. The City may limit the ftif streets'in accordance with the design standards of this Chapter. 2. Dead-End Roads (Permanent). Where a road does not extend to the ot^^accVss^\o" ad^continuation is not required by the City for to such property, its terminus shall normally not be boundary^ than fifty (50) feet. However, the reservation of an appropriate easement to ac ORONO CC 459 (4-1-84) "rT71~T^* 1.- 1. _f■ A > I A* ^ \... • K: \ § 11.33 D Intersections shall be designed with a flat stoonlng area of at least thirty (30) feet in a residential area and* sixty (60) feet in a commercial or industrial area. ihe stopping area shall be designed to provide a maximum grade of two (2) percent. E. Where any street intersection will involve earth banks or existina vegetation inside any lot corner that would create a traffic'hazard by limiting visibil i ty, the subdivider shall cut such ground and/or vegetation (including trees) in connection with the grading of the right-of-way to the extent deemed necessary by the City to provide an adequate sight distance. F. The crown of all streets^ including intersectjxSns, shall be three percent (3%) or less. \/ Subd 4 Typical Section. The typical section indicated herein is as determined for a Clay Subgrade (A-6 Soil Classifica ­ tion) and may be subject to change. Soil borings may be required to be determined by the City. Private Street — Residential Units 3-6 R.O.W.* 50' M.P.W.** 24' Section 8" Class 5 100% crushed 3” 2341 Bituminous Surface Over 7 50'28'8" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface Public Street - Residential Units 3-10 R.O.W.^ 50' M.P.W.** 28' Sect ion 8" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface Over 10 50'32'8" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface Maximum Maximum cul-de-sac length - 1,000' number of units on cul-de-sac - 10 Public Street - Commercial or Industrial Units 1+ R.O.W.* 70' M.P.W.** 32' Section 8" Class 4 S" Class 5 100% crushed 4" 2341 Bituminous surface * Right-Of-Way Width ** Minimum Paved Width • ORONO CC 462 (4-1-84) . -- -.-...am . .. . . .. ' f .►:.y § 11.40 \^/ SEC. 11.40.road dedication and reservations . Subd. 1. New Perimeter Streets. Street systems in new subdivisions shall be laid out so as to eliminate or avoid new perimeter half-streets. Where an existing half-street is adjacent to a new subdivision, the other half of the street shall be improved and dedicated by the subdiv.der. The City may authorize a new perimeter street where the subdivider improves and dedicates the entire required street right-of-way width within his own subdivision boundaries. Subd. 2. Widening and Realignment of Existing Roads. Where a subdivision borders an existing narrow road or when the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or some other agency indicates plans for realignment or widening a road that would require use of some of the land in the subdivision, the subdivider shall be required to imorove and dedicate at his expense such areas for widening or realignment of such roads. Such frontage roads and streets shall be improved and dedicated by the subdivider at his own expense to the full width as required by this Chapter. Subd. 3. Land reserved for any road purposes may not be counted in satisfying yard or area requirements of the Zoning Chapter whether the land is to be dedicated to the City in fee simple or an easeirit- ‘t i- granted to the City. SEC. 11.41. DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS Subd. 1. General Requirements. The City shall not aporove any subdivision which does not make adequate provision for storm or flood water runoff. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown for each and every lot and block. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewer system. Storm sewers, where required, shall be designed by the method as approved by the City, and a copy of design tions shall be submitted along with plans. Inlets shall be provided so that surface water is not carried across or around any intersection, nor for a distance of more than 600 feet the gutter in urban areas. When calculations indicate ^" capacities are exceeded at a point, no further allowance made for flow beyond that point, and basins shall be used to intercept flow at that point. Subd. 2. Nature of Storm Water Facilities. A. Location. The subdivision shall be required by the City to carry away by pipe or open ditch any spring or surface water that may exist either previously ^ the road subdivision. Such drainage facilities shall be right-of-way where feasible, or in with of aopropriate width, and shall be constructed i the City's construction standards and specifications. ORONO CC 464 (4-1-84) § 11.62 SEC. 11.62. SUBDIVISIONS. PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS, CLASS II AND III I Subd. 1. Lands For Public Use. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, (1989), Section 462.358, subd. 2b, the City requires all persons, ccrcorations or other legal entities that subdivide land with the City of Orono as a preriBquisite to approval of a lot division, final plat, or development of any land previously divided by plat, metes and bounds, or any ether means, must convey to the City or dedicate to the public, for use as parks, playgrounds, trails, or ocen space, a given percentage of the land being platted or developed* as hereinafter specified, said portions to be approved by the City. In lieu thereof, the subdivider shall, at the option of the City pay to the City, for use in the acquisition, development or maintenance of public parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands or open spaces and debt retirenient in connection with ^.he land previously acquired for such public purposes, an equivalent amount in cash based upon the fair market value of the land to be developed. The form of contribution (cash or land, or any combination thereof) shall be decided by the City Council based upon the need and conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 2. Dedicated Land Requirements. Any land to be dedicated as a requirement of this Section shall be reasonab y adaptable for the above public purposes. Factors used in evaluating the adequacy of proposed dedicated areas shall include size, shape, topography, drainage, geology, tree cover, access and location. 0 ..Subd. 3. Land Dedication Minimum Area. Subdividers ' shall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, playgrounds, trails, open spaces and other public purposes as a minimum that percentage of gross land area, or other such amount as may be determined by the City Council, as set forth below: A. Residential/agricu 1 tura 1/mu 1 tip le residential zoned land. Dedication requirement of 8% of the land being platted, subdivided or existing lot of record. &. Commercia1/industria1 zoned land. Dedicated requirement of 8% of the land being platted subdivided or existing let of record. Subd. 4. Cash Contribution in L' u of Lands. In those instances where a cash contribution is to be made y subdivider, in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cas contribution to be contributed shall be equivalent to t e rair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land that would ot er wise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account or such funds in a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. ORONO CC 471 (4-9-90) L •* i> • • >■________ — .'Tv § 11.62 Subd 5 Fair Market Value of Lands. "Fair Market preliminary plat application in accordance witn the following: A The City Assessor shall recommend to the City Council as to the fair market value of the land after consultation with the subdivider. B If agreement is not reached between the City Assessor and subdivider, then the fair market value shall be determined in accordance with the following: 1 Fa’r market v»lue as determined by the City council based upon a currc^ appraisal -.ubmitbed to the by the subdivider, at his expense. The a-uraisal shall be made by appraisers iho are approved members or SREA or MAI, or equivalent real estate societies. 2 If the City disputes such appraisal amounts, it may obtain an appraisal of the 'property by a qualified real estate appraiser which the :ity Council selects and which ap^aisal m^^be accepted by the City as bein, an accurate appraisal at fair market value. The cost of the appraisal shall be paid by the subdivider. 3. The subdivider may appeal any final determination of fair market value as provided by Minnesota Statute Section 462.361. C. The determination of fair market value of the undeveloped land by the City Assessor, • City Council, or appraisers, shall be determined as of the time o pre ni-t subdivision approval is granted as long as ^ P^^e tiL of preliminary plat approval is ® the subdivision, its probable population, lot siz the"time other relevant factors are known. If an extension limits in this chapter is approved by the City . market value shall be determined as of the time of /PP5°^^^ ^ that extension. In determining the fair market value as ot time of preliminary plat application, or the extension thereof, to be included in the analysis shall include any A which are generally accepted and used by approved members of bRLA or MAI or equivalent real estate appraisal societies. D. Notwithstanding the above, in no event shall the cash contribution per lot be less than $500.00 per lot or per dwelling unit. Ik M • • »ORONO CC 472 (4-9-90) •> % > m L § 11.62 Subd 6. Development of Land Previously Platted. (Repealed per ‘ordin.^nce #89, Second Series, adopted October 8, 1990. ) Subd. 7. Future Subdivision. Any land which is further subdivided, divided or replatted or applied for such subsequent to Mav 1 1990, shall be subject to the requirements of the ordinance then in effect concerning dedication of land for public purposes, and credit shall be given for any charges previously imposed upon that land if the subdivider can prove that fees where previously paid. In no event shall the City be liable for any payment which may be due because of a subsequent reduction in the application percentage of land or equivalent market value in cash to be dedicated. Subd. 8. Administrative Procedures. The City Council shall establish such administrative procedures as they may deem necessary or appropriate to implement the provisions of this section of the Code. Source: Ordinance 82, 2nd Series Adopted; 4-9-90 (Sections 11.63 through 11.69, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC 472-1 (4-1-34) S fIN f r.. 1 \ 7. « ri'i : 0- \ i**-' * ‘ '* Vi •; . H '‘sV • \ ’U 1-ii' ' ‘f l ',V <J •: !;• v'^'' ‘v'V-V '•‘.I'M* V'-VI "fglj 0 I • « '• ] r. i i: I I! , i • I • I M :■ -u. i:|n r•• f 'f I. I {v r ;■>}■! f -; ■ ■! ■■ .-^ > I S . ,'.. ' '.;*r ■' •'V .1 V'-v ••''■< 1 ;:-nV5' •i/i’V. ;*■ v-vf ■Air--% i >------ c:3^ To:Oronc Planning Commission Members Mayer Callahan and Orono Counciimembers Ron Mxtrse. City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator Date:September 13, 1993 Subject:/fl869 Sidney and Dar’^ara Rebers, 2080 Wayzata Boulevard Vacation of Eisement^Creation of New Easement At the time of the installation of the sewer lines to serve the Sugar Woods subdivision, a decision was made in the field to realign the line so that mamre trees could be saved. The line was installed along the north side of the ponding area and along the west side of Brown Road rather than as originally shown on location map, E.xhibit G. The current application involves the vacation of the original utility dedicated at the time of the final plat and the creation of new easements. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: 1.Section 10.12 - V.acation of easements vacated in the plat of Sugar Woods. The vacation involves easements dedicated within Outlot F over proposed sewer lines. Section li.03. Definition 66 (A) (3) - Subdivision code requires a metes and bounds subdivision with the creation or alteration of a public easement. Applicant shall be creating new easements over ponding area and utility line. List of Exhibits A B C D E F G n I Application Applicants’ Addendum Property Owners List Plat Map Description of Easement to be Vacated Proposed F.asement Descriptions Plan of Ea'^cment to be Vacated and Prv)poscd Gustafson Report Sucar Woods Pond and Utilities Plan and Profile Description of Request Please review Exhibit B. applicants’ addendum provides background on the proposed vacation and subdivision for the creation of a new utility easement. As already noted above, the lines did not follow the easement designated on the final plat and were altered at the time of installation. The current application will now redefine easement over as-built sewer line. Zoning File #1869 September 13, 1993 Page 2 Please review Exhibit H, Gustafson report. Gustafson asks for changes in the description of the easements to ensure that a minimum 15’ is maintained from center line ot sewer. Staff Recommendation To approve the pioposed vacation and subdivision of a metes and bounds division creating a utility easement per the condition set foith in the Engineer ’s report. The vacation/subdivision application will not be presented for Council ’s action until the revised legal descriptions have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. [tKTtlt mm RiinnHiOii [•v«i rifiKm iIiHiIf PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Commercial 81 Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) Vacant DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: Request for vacation of Drainage & Utility easement and creation of new easement conforming to as-built location of sanitary sewer. See attached letter.________________________________________ 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Fora. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Eennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmer. Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendiun to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6 7 YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR___ A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) POR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of C) erical Staff;____________________________________ Date_________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee pa^Tnent) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Jcnowledge. Applicant's signature Date August 25. 1993 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowl edges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Ccmmiraion Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have^ an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I B R W INC ^!al\nln^ rrjn>pi*rUtiun Fn^ine^ring L rban lX‘^n;n rhrrshf r Square 7U) HurJ Strwf S» MN --41^ ^12 370-«ax» Fax >78 Den\if Milw auktx* . linnta^'K>iis OrlanJo Portland San Die»;o Straitlf r>»n.ild W Rin^rt Kuhard IV VNoi^reld Thofr.a.» f- Carroll Craij; A Amnnds«*n Dvtiuid L Hard lohn H McNamara Richard D 1‘ilcrim Daif \ fW\ kmann lef’^rx L. Beiis**n Ralph C. Blum Car\') Fnck<on John C. l.vnch PaulN. Bav Sabn An a/ Gar> A ! hri*t Anlhofu Herpflmann Anjs Pakalns Martha NkPhee I toward P. Preblun Dennis P. Pn>bst 1i: A \^ y A V i: u '-A V.3 U j 0. j) \ August 26, 1993 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 RE: Request For Easement Vacation And Creation OUTLOT F, SUGAR WOODS Dear Ms. Mabusth; With this application, Sidney and Barbara Rebers, owners of OUTLOT F, SUGAR WOODS, hereby petition for vacation of a portion of a Drainage and Utility Easement within their property and also request that new easements be created to replace the one being vacated. To provide some background information for this request, in 1989 the owners platted and developed the northerly portion of their property into single family homesites. The sanitary sewer system serving this development commenced at a lift station located adjacent to the north right-of-way line of Highway 12 approxim.ately 250 feet west of Brown Road. The sanitary sewer system was desigrjx'i to commence at the lift station and run generally northeasterly to the southe.ist corner of single family development and from there run along the west side of Brown Road until entering the "neighborhood". When the proposed route vras laid out it was found to run through a mature forested area and that its installation would destroy a large number of the trees. At that time it was decided, in order to minimize the impact on the vegetation, that the sewer ’‘-’ould be realigned to run within the easement area in which the storm water pond was to be built. See the attached copies of Sheet 8 of the construction plans for the as-built location of the sanitary sewer line. It is necessary to both vacate the easement area where the sewer was initially intended to go and in turn create a replacement easement for the sewer line. Ms. Jeanne Mabutsh August 26,1993 Page 2 #1II Rf%Q Accordingly, we have prepared and enclosed copies of both the vacation and CTeation legal descriptions. Also enclosed is a survey showing those locations. In compliance with your requirements, we have also enclosed a Certified Property Owners list and mailing labels for properties within 350 feet of OUTLOT F. Should you need anything further to complete the easement vacation and subsequent replacement, please contact either myself or the project engineer, Mr. John Bertelsen, at 370-0700. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Respectfully Submitted, BRW, INC. Keith E. Dahl, RLS KED/jal Enclosures Mr. Sidney Rebers File 1359A.00 sugar.kd2 cc: 1 I -r«M ,1 l-raLtfWk I r*—------. f ^ <r iViX-Aair.MOi I r : ~ yr.XifPw* <iv '%>i 1.. tv. • .• RUN DATE 0B/16/9SBATCH 009PROP AOOR OitCR NANE TAXPAYER NAIC/AODR PROP ADOR (PMER NAME TAXPAYER NAfC/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAI«/AOOR PROP ADDR Wt- 9 NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 58 59-118-23 12 0003 00690 BROIffI RO N KATHRYN OU»CANT>ON K t A C DUNCANSON 690 8R0»t< RO N LONG LAKE NN 5E356 58 39-118-23 21 3015 02109 SUGARHOOO DR DAD AHLERS DAVID M A DIANE R AHLERS 2109 SUGARIIOOO OR LONG LAKE MN 55356 58 59-118-23 21 0018 02103 SUGARHOOO DR S M A A H LASKY STUART H A ANN N LASKY 2103 SUGARHOOO DR mONO m 55356 58 39-118-25 21 0022 02109 SUGARHOOO DR REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO REBCRS CONSTRUCTION CO 5529 HEBSTER AVE MPLS MTJ 55916 HtttlEPIN C0L9ITY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OUTERS LIST38 39-118-23 1200650 eROITN R". N TANA R SEISOLD TANA R SEIDOLD 650 BROTM RO N LONG LAKE HN 55356 58 39-118-23 21 0016 02107 SUGARHOOO DR L CRAMER COMPATTY L CRAMER INC 5500 LINCOLN DR EDINA Ttl 55936 58 39-118-23 21 0019 02101 SUGARHOOO DR MELVIN H CORNILLAUO ET AL MELVIN/JOSEPHiriE CORNILLAUO 2101 SUGARHOOO OR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 39-118-23 21 0023 02106 SUGARHOOO DR REBERS CUNSTRUCTIOtT CO REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO 3529 HEBSTER AVE MPLS HN 55916 REPORT NO. PI93590I PAGE 2938 39-118-23 21 000202160 HAYZATA BLVO H NILLIAM H NEAR t NIFE MINISTERS LITE/INV OEPT 3100 N LAKE ST MPLS MN 55916 38 39-118-23 21 0017 02105 SUGAr.HOOO OR REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO 3525 HEBSTER AVE MPLS fW 55916 38 39-118-2.3 21 0021 02102 SUGARHOOO OR REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO 3525 HEBSTER AVE MPLS Mtl 55916 38 39-118-23 21 0029 02108 SUGARHOOO OR REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO 3529 WEBSTER AVE MPLS MN 55916 i o o( / i i r-c ■ C • 4. t.1 • -f » * <7 % I''* u •»*'• .* -.t. • J A 1 L PROP AOOR (»MER NAIC TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 39-118-23 21 0025 02110 SUGARHOOO DR C TAKACH IMG TAKACH CSABA S MARIA 6 TAKACH 2110 SUGARHOOO DR LOTTG LAK rtl 55356 38 39-118-23 21 0026 02112 SUGARHOOO DR SCOTT LARSON CONST INC SCOTT LARSON CONSTRUCTION CO 15873 ELOOIE LA MlriTETOTILA MN 55395 58 39-118-23 21 0027 02119 SUGARHOOO OR REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO 3529 HEBSTER AVE MPLS MN 55916 1 '• • » • . ' 'i'* ■ I • r V r- PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 58 59-118-25 21 0030 0005S ADDRESS UTTASSIGNEO SUGAR HOODS HOMEOTtCRS ASSOC SUGAR HOODS HOMEOHNERS ASSOC 3529 HEBSTER AVE ST LOUIS PARK ttJ 55916 50 59-118-25 21 0032 00038 AOORESS PENDING SIDNEY B I BARBARA REBERS SIDNEY B I BARBARA REBERS 3525 HEBSTER AVE ST LOUIS PARK TVT 5591$ 38 39-118-23 29 0001 02120 HAYZATA BLVO H HIUIAM HEAR ETAL HILLIAH H HEAR 36 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE TSl 55356 • t t.. •»'- m \ • - \ 'A I / * I RUN DATE 0a/16/9S BATCH 009 V PROP ADDR ONNER MAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER HAKE TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR OIPIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 3a 5<^-lia-23 24 0058 00038 ADDRESS PENDING SIDfREY 8 I BARBARA REBERS SIDNEY B I BARBARA REBERS 3525 MEBSTER AVE ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 72 34-118-23 13 0071 01964 HAYZATA BLVD H STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE 1964 NAYZATA BLVD H LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 24 0014 00522 VIRGINIA AVE J J A S M RUFF JOItN J A SHARON RUFF 14016 KNOLLHAY OR MINNEIONKA MN 55305 72 34-118-23 24 0025 02045 NAYZATA BLVD H D CREAR A M B CREAR DAN CREAR 1980 SPATES AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 72 34-118-23 24 0028 00525 VIRGINIA AVE JEFFREY L MARTINEAU JEFFREY L MARTir^EAU 2565 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA m 55391 72 34-118-23 24 0039 02045 SHAUGHNESSY CIR JAM irr/EsniErrrs JAM INVESTMENTS 6341 KINGSVIEH LA N MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 HEttltPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFIIERS LIST 72 34-118-23 13 0003 01953 NAYZATA BLVD H NE5TERN MEfJN CO PIONEERS NEST HEItlEPIN PIONEERS ASSOC 1Q53 H NAYZATA BtVO L0fH5 LAKE MN 55556 72 34-118-23 24 0002 02073 NAYZATA BLVD H GREGORY M SHAUGHNESSY LOfJG LAKE FORD TRACTOR 1\K 2075 N NAYZATA BLVD P 0 BOX 697 LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 24 0015 00512 VIRGINIA AVE G M SMITH ATM SMITH GARY M A TERESA M SMITH 512 VIRGir4lA AVE LOTK; lake MN 55356 72 34-118-23 24 0026 00545 VIRGINIA AVE D CREAR A M B CREAR DAN CREAR 1980 SPATES AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 72 34-118-23 24 0029 00515 VIRGINIA AVE 0 A C SMEBY OMEN H SMEBY 515 VIRGINIA AVE, LONG LAKE Mim 55356 72 34-118-23 24 C040 02065 SHAUGHNESSY CIR r40RTH CENTRAL EQUIP CO NORTH CENTRAL EQUIP CO p o BOX zr LONG LAKE MN 55356 > ».. •■5 ^REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 30 7Z 39-1^8-^3 13 0018 01977 HAYZATA BIVO H KERRY NA3SAUCR ETAL TRILAKE INVESTMENTS IZS 1NGERS0(4 KO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 72 39-118-23 29 0015 00522 VIRGINIA AVE J J S S H RUFF JOHN J A SHARON RUFF 19016 KNOLLMAY OR MINNETONKA iCl 55305 CD 72 39-118-23 29 0016 00512 VIRGINIA AVE G M SMITH ATM SE«TH GA.<Y M A TERESA M SMITH 512 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE (O; 55356 72 39-118-23 29 0027 00535 VIRGINIA AVE MARGARET E HILKES MARGARET E HILKES 535 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE ttJ 55356 ' ’ /i *Y J t) i 4 A Y I \ • « 9 •i. 72 39-118-23 29 0036 02069 NAYZATA BLVO H M R A I 8 ROD THOMAS A HAIS'.ET C/0 STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE BOX 636 LONG LAKE Mt4 55356 Ij’^- V I 72 39-118-23 29 0096 02025 SHAUGHNESSY CXR GREGORY M SHAUGHNESSY GREGORY M SHAUGHNESSY PO BOX 697 LONG LAKE MN 55556 i \•RUN DATE OB/ifc/95oBATCH 009 72 54-118-25 24 0048 i PROP ADOR 02075 NAYZATA BLVO H OHNER NAME GREGORY H 5HAUGHNE5SY TAXPAYER LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR nahe/aoor 2075 H HAYZATA BLVD ( •P 0 BOX 497VLONG LAKE m 55356 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 009 f NAHE/AOOR t • # HEfllEPIfi COiXlTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LIST T2 S4-118-?5 OOA» 005<*0 VIRGINIA AVE PAUL S G03UGARIAN ET AL P S t P GOSHGARIAN 5RA5 LAKEVIEN DR HOUND HN 55SA4 * * V> • •< f REPORT NO. PIA55A01 PACE 51 7Z j<k-118-25 Z<k 0052 02085 DANIELS ST QUENTIN P NEMSTROM ET Al LAKE ENGINEERING INC P O BOX 787 2085 DANIEL ST LONG LAKE m 5535A-Q787 ■ • j ( V’ r f » ; ' tp I I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT Ai i'EARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEItlEPlN COUITY DEPARTMENT. OF PROPER^ TA.VATIOM, TO THff BEST or MY KUONLEOGE AND BELIEF. 7 / . «u W oesi DATE' 4- .^7 . > f * . ( i ■ i __ .r! *1 - ; ^ « •i* -4 _jr ■• '♦) s J ./ Tv. -4Ul M x»io» I • fV) 5 m •» T< »4' «a //•5-'T^ ^4) » ; ^ .y ____hi i _______3: ? .. < —:“-i_____________::ijj ^•^T'-’»' .... WAY7ATA BLVO W Si* :i r X / "" I -- ___________ V •* , - --------------. jc ^ • t iMi COetgMERCIt ’AL (35) R' *1 CO) (56) ! Tjirr DANIELS 4* o4 X o«TatT ITT* «• s w u'l 1/1 A. c_>(46) ■ V ' ‘h’r / V ( 4 ’»< J •w /:« M S («)(21) (») i :ai ;pA8xi j' " iWT lOI ,» ,*. ►™3J 1 '■,..7 'u w h ^ V( !7I NX yi.S’t S«l-X ■ ^ •' #V !>4' r'U) t » 41 :;• C8) ’„ A'' s' 4\,!'>l' 'o*‘« '•' . VI •• t.T.r '*«ti .« ! i5e) / )>f «s t ^i» •”i?^'*'’ sj/m »♦«* ' Il.l/ y\l f ••n\ ■\ > A.JKf " /J ' •■ J• VV..-vt' V J K^53 ii « N ^ ,vr '. :i*<''’r. AT I ~N 'r.f CRI ?T ITN '. A * /r.','.-<*. . MIN!iicCT.A ft •» C-nTLOT ?. ^ •'1-«• * i «.’••S 1• ^ . ••T t. .> ^ *>‘. %-v ♦• < .% A^'IXSk . t.l^ « j ^ X.i re*;r jr o •; perr ?f the 30 f:'Ot wide Zreineje .:•■•.• j.-.r *•?::;;•:•:>inr? t.: r:;- Pi?»t of the Regietr^r ?i Titles. Henn.ep’in County. • «s. v*«a - ^ /-' •*file e.n'J of T" ^ '• A ♦ • -jrrice % •. A « Ali • • A * ‘w‘ *m’r*:.e.-4.v :: ^i:*e f.* - V •• A'. • • -j •* « 4 : .* . - - .- • .« » W <. •- 4 • .-fee ■4-: ! t;;e: drew;; p-srfvllel .^cr^cenrri -• "• » '— • .• nr » •• :;ier-.v ^ me .^31■ -4 "m ^ • L4... JU. *ifV c 3 ‘2 I ^ tk ^ nT'^I^KiT’ r^m T Z^T* 7 OK# . « ^ ^ ^ ««r.A*.W**^** «. Ai.. •- ^X* .* •3^-’ A M *•■ ^ « «!—' '•*- *»«*"^*% OT^Ofjr; Kf T \: r ^ '--*■•-»•••*• t 1 4 * ft * *—< •• *« ft I •* « 4 c* r* «&>"•*I A 4 *.■ 4 « W rITOea V . *5 r, f- '•. *a y-A . , • fa a. fti4 \.' W 4 * • i> ^ 4 4 A <» *=* Cl C- A A >*' ♦■ W W W 44 t . 4 4 •-' thni ^-art fcr C' I **-.11 V*0 ' f> *.■ ^ ^ w . V JL'.'T ^ n "> -ftr . w «L A .fc '•M ^>-*v *»cp.ao- . -. \7 A v» 1 /» A ♦*• r* y» .*J»■(• *, f w. TT- w* ft»- V ». t 4 <>A4 . '«% *3 4> »4 4 4 •*• •4 m 4 i.'9A ” Vy'.?.'I-3. Si;:o-:-r‘.:irii/ tv • A >*' •’• ^4 4 *.4 V 4 4 « mm ^ V. »"% «:& ♦•» ^ »*. • •»4ft4ft. ^<^44 W4 ^4-44 44M ^ . 4*«. * ^ •4 M *4 . • . «• • •• a* 4ft • • 4; • J ' 4 4W ft 4^ 4 • 4.4 4 * ft* 4 4 • 4. ♦ 4 • -• ■:>f i'-“?:-r:: in t/.* r'ffidSf vf th-? n-?gistr?»r ^ 1V ^ 1 • K»f ‘ »-. 4-s ^ ^ •• A V* »'. a *“ A .'i a c- -.• ft.<4 ft *. > • 4 ft * ft ft* 4 .' W ar ft •• 4 ft* ft W ^ 4 4 W «4 ?n? r 0 S E.: c n ;? ?. i d :- 1 a t: -^,44 -» ^4 • W 4ft • ♦ • 44 ' ■• •• «4 4>44.kft*44 •• teft a »-% •-• ^4 4 ft* .-. pt5r.’nsi;ns-:'n airc'ss all uno-i-r r* *•> 4 4 >4 ft . fk ft 4^ ea^fii.ant for pv;'::-li:- utility p.u'po£>?f :vf?r. that part of said ‘X'TLOT r lying '.vostorly of "•EAIMA3E EASEMENT FOE PONDING PUEFOSES described above, and iving utheasreriy of the following describe5 *.* •*• A 4ft ■«. 4 4 . ___ . , -ft .■.^4ft-4.44*ft-44ft4»-44-4 —tft # 4-ft 4 • "44Co::-T;eroir.g at rne soutnv.'est corner or said i.'nniNfton i FvE PONDING PUEFOSES: thence on an assu;;.ed bearing of North 01 degrees 15 minutes OC seconds Eaet aio;.g the westerly lir.e of said rr.AINAGE EASEMENT FOr. FONlTN'l r >. r.?‘..>Sc..;. loi' /l.oo feet to the actual i-oint of regirnni.nff of Tlie lir;e to be described: thence Sov:th IT degrees 19 minutes IS seccr.ds West fcr ‘^9.11 ”o the southerly ii.ne of said OUTLIT F ano thereI eet terminating. rL % WiXWiyWj iYiii\ ly 1 n OUTLOT PROPOSED EASEMENT 30* DRAINAGE ic UTILITY EASEMENT SOUTHERLY LINE OUTLOT F RUNK highway No. i )f) blvd. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME. OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE^TATE OF MINNESOTA. ^ £ DENOTES EASEMENT TO BE VACATED L C9-13-1993 09:19 61? 6?S 1311 ST-. ~NE3TROO a A3SC.P.C4 m Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk& Associates CJBo C j io^«*oa jrvop C »f Virf'vr k GiFnn • Cam. Ff C >«c^k •»* ifuam C fi k4T> M Cbr*4n, C Engineers A Arehlttcti September 13, 1993 A Ooidon Af t Pi a ijm^« fhmn C »wie^ a i a A low«0'* ^1 Mj»« a A| MrfFAH Aiuef^te^. f| Tto A f««0 F§ >C^AI 1 Arwiy* A . A Oor«lB C Al TN ittus £ Angui Ft Ijf*^ Ff ^ £a- A^^ M •-*! A fC • j •yA# •! W AIW'KKI Pt VlfPAFi t l^OCF. FJ JA-^l t M»a^ Pf .»*> O PP^TTV^. FI koft * A'^FF* f# • Aroofion, »| Ma/t • iDtfi #1 Mr% A fF«i Af QA^ 4/ Mor«a •£ CANt* J lA^nor ^1 A •<! Icfwrvdi PI ; c«tiwt« ^1 Mart n A4.H tf ■ JFF«pfi F| ^ PFiflp c^9i0i PI it^rr^ i Ff C#7 0 Ar“WW Ff P VW A hIF». Ff •CH^ • pf 00y^4t J IrxiF PI IPPM^ 0 Gutuhon Pt Cfc^ O’W' Pi Fau> O NfvT Pf .aF« P Oow. Pf C^nei A ttttofi LFO M Piwy»»iv N jf#f M OnOF // Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Sugar Woods Easement Vacation File No. 139*1869 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the request to vacate and create easements on Outlot F, Sugar Woods. The vacation is requested due to a realignment of the sanitary sewer construction across the property. As it is shown on the survey, the vacation is not acceptable. The survey shows that the realigned sewer is within the drainage easement for ponding purposes and proposed easement to be created. However, dimensions are not shown from the sewer to the edge of the easement and the distance appears to be from 8 to 14 feet. Because of the close proximity of the pond, we would require at least 15 feet of utility easement from the centerline of the sewer at any point along the realignment, lliis is consistent with the easement to be vacated. The easement description and survey should be revised. Please contact me at this office if you have any que.«tions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. / Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building Zoning Ad mini strator DATE:September 8, 1993 SUBJECT: #1851 Orono Woodlands, Inc. - Paul Phillips, 2100/2140 Si.xth Avenue North Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.12 Application involves the vacation of drainage and utility easements dedicated in the plats of the Eckstrom Addition and Phillips W'oodland Terrace. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owner ’s List D - Description of Easements to be Vacated E - Survey of Drainage and Utility Easements Designated at the Time of Plat of Comprehensive Lot Line Rearrangement The subdivision of the two properties was reviewed at our last meeting. One of the necessary steps to be completed prior to the finalization of the subdivision was the vacation of drainage and utility easements. Members may remember that a septic system to be installed for Orono Woodlands, Inc. was located within the dedicated easement. The drainage and utility easements must be first vacated and will then be rededicated in the final plat. A plat has been recommended by the surv’eyor because of the complexities of the legal descriptions to be created if the subdivision was approved in a metes and bounds format. It is the intention ot staff to present the vacation application before the Council at their September 27th meeting so that the tiiial plat can be acted on at the October 11, 1993 meeting. Because of the need to move as swiftly as possible concerning the installation of a new septic system for Orono Woodlands, Inc., staff will recommend that the new septic system be installed as soon as the vacation of the easements is formerly acted on by titc Council. Staff Recommendation To approve the vacation of the drainage and utility easement dedicated in the Eckstrom Addition over Lot 2, Block 1 and in the Phillips Woodland Terrace over Lot 4, Block 1 as shared lot line will be redefined and former drainage and utility easements will be obsolete. r CITV OF CROliO — CFNFRAL IJ\ND US^^j^LF^tTION -7f“I iPROPERTY LOCATION QIOO /^1^0 (f(^^.^.6)Site Address Identification Number (P.I.D.)Pr<->perty Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. applicant Name jUooH A ,/y; K . Phone (hone) 7*'^ - O / i{Phone (work) Address J / no ^ ^ //i 'I-'. ( City h'^-PC- iAKf. ^ip.-gQjg. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- Address Phone (home) Phone _ _ _ _ City AJ Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^^ (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels Oi. land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Cse $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.)^ m •rnmm m • $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments . I $150.00 Duplex Crsdit/Bldg $250.00 Ccmmercial/Industrial Use , * '-.A = \ m. -• t t* V - . • 'V •'Tl, V.. ■*441 . I - •. $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. lakeshoreGrading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of laKesnore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - SIOO.OO (no change After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application tee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation ^ Easement Vacation Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals i w w ^ — Other - see fee schedule PRESENT DSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District 1 4 Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in^detail: y 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list from Eenneoin County Deoartment of Finance A-6*03 Governnen Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is ncc complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: ' '* Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zcning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Pj‘ OWNERS SIGNATURE Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date ^ L') M Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. -.V-,'V • ».v «•' • * * .* < * i >■'1 .• • f • ■- 4 •• • — *C,.* / “ r^/ .*i •• • • *' •. ^, . • • • . ■• • ..•***!v* ».***^.**‘*k’!t .-*, ‘ ^ '. '• ‘ ^ • ••- ' - •■' *• .: " • » t '* :•■'-•• f ;^ n** • '.’V: •■.-■''ji !<.■;/>’■*'»''• ■'^‘* ■ I « i X '• fculrfK'UKft /.’ -y‘* *' '4' • w' r' . “w^ *.*5jC^ wAt %'^v: ~ , VV > r n • < « * * ' • .... .• . WiM- ••?*., . •, -- » ) -r-v • « V mjN DATE 07/El/?5 ftArCH 001PROP AODR CM€R HiHP TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP AODR OlOIER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 50 27-118-E5 51 0002 02060 SIXTH AVE N TRINITY ENG EVAN LUTM CM I^JC TRINITY LUTHERA^I CHURCH 2060 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55IS6 58 27-118-25 31 0016 02165 SIXTH A € N DANIEL G I RUTH G MCPHERSOfI DANIEL 6 I RUTH G MCPHERSON 2165 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE rtl 55356 58 27-118-25 51 0019 02085 SIXTH AVE N J R HARESH A D J MARESH JOHN R A DIANE J HARESH 2085 CO RO 6 ORONO MN 55356 58 27-118-25 31 0022 01090 COX FARM RO COX BROTHERS FARM FULLERTON PROPERTIES IIC 608 2ND AVE S WIS HN 55602 MErt€.'IN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Olt4ER3 LIST58 27-118-23 31 000502135 SIXTH AVE N RICHARD C VAHT9N ET At RICHARD A SALLY VALITOfi 2135 COUNTY ROAD 6 LONG LAKE Ftl 55356 58 27-118-23 31 0017 02160 SIXTH AVE N P R A M 8 PHILLIPS DOUGLAS B BROI>t4 2160 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55>56 58 27-118-23 51 0020 01095 BR0IP4 PO N J R HARESH A D J HARESH JOHN HARESH A DIANE HARESH 2085 COUNTY RO 6 ORONO MN 55356 38 27-118-23 32 0008 01180 PHILLIPS DR J J LAHTI ATM LAHTI JOSEPH J A TERESA H LAHTI 1180 PHILLIPS DR LONG LAKE m 55356 PROP ADDR S8 27-118-23 32 0010 58 27-118-23 32 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED 01115 COX FARM RD ONNER NAME HARY 8 PHILLIPS COX BROTHERS FARM TAXPAYER MARY 8 PHILLIPS FULLERTON PROPERTIES I^4C NAME/ADDR BOX 755 608 2ND AVE S O LOtR; LAKE MN 55356 F«PLS MT4 55402 o 80 27-118-23 26 0001 80 27-118-23 24 0003 PROP ADDR 00080 ADDRESS UNASSIGinTO 02160 SIXTH AVE N OFtlER NAME DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PAUL R A rtARY B PHILLIPS TA>0>AYER DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DOUGLAS B BROI414 o NAHE/ADOR 1200 HARNER RO 2160 6TH AVE N • • ST PAUL MINN 55106 LOr4G LAKE Mr4 55356 ©" « * • « •• REPORT m. PI655601 PAGE 138 27-118-23 31 000902100 SIXTH AVE N 0R0f40 HOOOLANOS INC OROeiO WOODLANDS INC 2160 6TM AVE N LOf4G LAKE HT4 55356 38 27-118-23 31 0018 02160 SIXTH AVE N PAUL R PHILLIPS PAUL R PHILLIPS BOX 755 L014G LAKE m 55356 38 27-118-23 31 0021 01120 COX FARM RD COX BROTHERS FARM FULLERTOf4 PROPERTIES I14C 608 2ND AVE S MPLS m 55602 38 27-118-23 32 0009 01200 PHILLIPS DR PAUL R PHILLIPS PAUL R PHILLIPS BOX 755 LOr4G LAKE MN 55356 80 27-118-25 23 0002 01200 PHILLIPS OR PAUL R PHILLIPS PAUL R PHILLIPS BOX 755 LONG LAKE m 55356 80 27-118-25 26 0006 02160 SIXTH AVE N PAUL R PHILLIPS PAUL R PHILLIPS BOX 755 LONG LAKE MN 55356 J 'H y -0 I % 0 0 0 o Q ^ VX,) a 0 RUN DATE 07/2i/nBATCH 001 PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR o u 00 27-110-25 2A 0005 O'^SO PMIUIPS OR P RY B PHILLIPS MARY 0 PHILLIPS BOX 755 LONG LAKE rt4 5535^ 5i I * .1►'» ' v *”* 7 it 'Cv/ \*QiJVi,i‘ j: • »- .. • HE»«PIH COUNTY PROPERTY 1NF0RMAT10»4 SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI<»5i»**0X PACE Zeo 27-118-25 24 0008 01280 PHILLIPS DR MARY 8 PHILLIPS MARY B PHILLIPS BOX 755 LONG LAKE EM 55558 TOTAL BATCH 001 OO020i 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEtPJEPIN COLUTTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KT40NLEOGE AND BELIEF.. DATE llRlBaBCt • • . . •£:-.s • k COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. •UWVCVINO. CNOmcmiNO and land PLANNfNQ 4«a-A TAMANACK AVCNUC LONG LAKC. MINN SSasa if m V li » i ’"i 9 Drainage & Utility Easement Vacation Description for Paul Phillips in Lot 2. Block 1, ECKSIROM ADDITION and Lot 4. Block 1. PHILLIPS WOODLAND TERRACE Hennepin County, Minnesota August 27, 1993 Existing Drainage & Utility Easement to be Vacated 1. The existing drainage and utility easements over Lot 2, Block 1, F.CKSTROM ADDITION and over Lot 4, Block 1, PHILLIPS WOODLAND TERRACE, as dedicated in the respective plats • thereof. • ••1 ii n-*Jriia ’ k ■'rtr A OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1. PHILLIPS jJND^L|^^BLOCK 1. ECKSTROM ADDITION .se.’'if. rrp sers*'>rw 8 CO.STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 6 o: denotes Iron marker All bearings are based upon an arsuraed da*.un legal description of premises SURVEYED: B P°OPOS£D|DESCR!PnOF.s*'’^ WOODLAND TERRACS, and Lot 2. Block i. ECKSIROM AODHIOS. 2BinriE«S^ also the ><est 5.00 feet of the North 155.00 feet of Lot n ifioisj 'e ?" :N ■ s * .#3 vi ■south of the North 155.00 feet of s^ld Lot 2 and No?th^Sl a IIm dr!^^ E2;t®^at . • » . : r* v‘* t ■’ 4. , • . **• •.' I • • • r. • /fc ■ 1 1 #• V. •« 4 * « 14?•1 •;« »-k •* . Vi •M '.r < *i !"-d •>.t ■'it ►•:i / / • TO:Planning Conmission Members Ron Moorse, Cit>’ Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabus*’ Bb''**'"® * DATE; September 14, 1993 SEWECT: 4.850 lame. Spinner. 940 Norrh Arm Drive - Varianees Public Hearing - Continuation of List of Exhibits . Location Niap B - Original Survey C - Current Suirey 250-500 ’ D - Hardcover Fact Sheets 0-75 , /a E - Plan for Hardcover . F - Average Lakeshore Setback SketchF - Average ---- i/iKS0 was tabled so that an updated sur\ey At your August“ applicant was to review the new tacts an hardcover inventory could be provioeo. to pre at plan for hardcover reductions.at plan a or naiut^k^wt Review Eshibiu C^a^J^ *9 ,^’,;lemlTinhe"'o^gin\^^^^ Tm'ajori'.y Slarandp-m^^^^^^^ "t:hor:re:^s Is’ ^W Wi^n 0« 0.75- and 55 s.f. of structural hardcover setback area. Z. refer to Exhibits D-3, D-3 and E, as noted If it was installed, it was . observed bv surveyor, ihe reason for spor.idic growth also obstrs . • A __ m A 4 4 as the concrete aiea along I Zoning Memo #1850 September 14, 1993 Page 2 sloping of the concrete was to direct drainage to the north and eventually to the lake. The paved area adjacent to the proposed garage stall would be needed to presers’e integrity of new addition and also foundation of residence, lie noted the residence was located within a major drainage collection or low area for the local watershed and of the need to protect foundation of structure by redirecting surface runoff away from structure. Don Ilerstein. Mr. Spinner’s contractor, w ill be present at your meeting to pre.sent photographs depicting the drainage patterns on the property and other information pertaining to protection of foundations given the uniqueness of topography. The following ordinances are pertinent for the review of the amended application: Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) A.As already noted in the earlier review’, the garage addition to be installed at the lakeside of the e.xisiing residence will be located in front of the average lakeshore setback as the entire residence is kKated in front of the average lakeshore setback line, review Exhibit F. B.Lakeshore setback variance Required = 75 ’ Existing = 57 ’ Proposed = 65 ’ V'ariance for new structure = 10’ or 13.3% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover A.0-75 ’ setback area = 10,822 s.f. E.xisting = 2, 697 s.f. or 24.92% Proposed = 1,931 s.f. or 17.8% (addition of 209 s.f. of new structural hardcovf*r and removal of 766 s.f. of nonsiructural hardcover) B.75-250’ setback area = 28,040 s.f. Existing = 12,089 s.f. Proposed = 9.122 s.f. or 32.5% (removal of 96 s.f. of concrete area/planter boxes. 2.871 s.f. plastic underliner) Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage Total lot area = 42,432 s.f. Allowed = 6,3(i4.8 s.f. or 15% Existing = ’*'6,440 s.f. or 15.1% Proposed = 6,704 s.f. or 15.7% Variance = 339.2 s.f. or .7% I 'iw*. J i i • J 1 Zoning Memo #1850 September 14. 1993 Paue 3 ♦Note that ordinance requires area«j of pool basin and associated decks or patios in lot coverage consideration Issues for Consideration 1. Will you approve new structural improvements within the 0-75 ’ setback area? Can garage stall be located to west side of garage out of protected area? Will you approve a lot coverage variance for a property that has 42,432 s.f. in 2 3 area? Can .7% or 339.2 s.f. of existing decks around pool be removed? . ____1. ~ Hfii'paci* within the 75-250’ setback area of 339.- s.f.also result in a hardcover decease within the 75-250 „ or i.2% bringing total hardcover to 31.33 S;f-, imptovernenti'wim applicant's representative to determine removals can be considered --staff tried!!! Refer to Exhibits D and E. Any condition of approval must include the condition that any hardcover improvements scheduled ir“ rval mustV completed prtor to the footing inspect.on tor new constructton. 1 r •« • ... , , • .••• ■ ■ ^,» I . » • ••: . ' •• ‘▼'■•" w* •-. * *• ** * ^ *%• .. »• ‘• • • r..jT • 7^»* •• ' . • «• •• ».*■*» i • • • JL «r» . r--rr ^ .- . s • • o /' ■** > • * •’^ -"T^ ‘ •*- ^ ^ IA ■• =>r4-**!? ,./*• • -"A. -i^^ ■ ••'■ * ;; '^ >^''■■ ■'-">- ■ V'"= ^V'HVa ■;VA'i<-*. .*r, ^- -K ••••.'•A' •'- k. *• : ■*• *y > if;**' *7'. ^ t"* . • j# P-*-.— ‘ ^ *^19' ‘"^ ' ^ * ‘ • •• . ' - % . ■*7f • • • • -Z-'' *• ^ • -• -1'f •* .**-' -o ~\ y-. • yo. - • * '*.•<**•* ^ • a. . , .* • * .•* ' *^- .;7r* •-/* • .^ - /. .vw <•'?-.^ «■ ^ # * • ^ S5»2 t* v.-% « L± o — I/I —o OJ ^ c^ *T CD toa>^ m ^oCL rH* O 3 S TT —• CT x> mm§^ to ^#-4- in zr — ft» ° ^O UJ D O)3 • • CL :z CU Z3 r-^ CL *-^ Q.*-<o Ql ft) r-f»•P zr zr h—• O o) n)O Cn 01 =3 cr Q.v< Ln 3 It Vil • i CN f- ft > ••. • •*»hardcover calculatiqm worksheet , setback -zone : .(cikcu one V' 0-75'' 75-250'/^250-500'), 500-1000 D .iExisting Har dcover in Zon e . . • * • f • ............• » * ^ji •n I . House i*s «»» ** •t • LENGTH WIDTH * ‘ ’ i;/ i •i I t # 5• % I ...• * W * ^ , - * II t .*•. A # • t S.F. ‘ ► • • • »• % . • • .*A v*il • V f X : .• ...4 iJ 1' r. rr • »• •• « ** • _ X_____— A •: , %• .* .... ■ • ■ • ^ ^ * .• V”*♦'■A'*' •• •St Ft • • S.F/ • \ » • «.«« .4 *. • ••%••• • •-• •• * • ^ 4 ••» \ .•» B. 6arage • • !• 1 • •• c. Driveway ’ X X _ S.F*. :.»r;. lAi..'Ac G A* • '*•« * •' * * . ^ S.F. © ■ •5 X • * m « • *% •• « •• <•.*», < i - »• • . i, j. ■..* . *K S.F’. : ^ % .•. «7. . • ■: D,..Sidewalk m # S.F. , .‘ v • • • i • • « .. .• • ■ •t • * •• ? .* (• A . . • • . •> «* « ••••.♦« ••mA’ft . /•V •• • a* ____**• _____- StFi^ f . J t F. Landscape areas ^ underlain -BY ■ . . • PLASTIC SHECriNG _ X --------------- r / * S.F. s # - X .i . :i..‘ as . • • •. ; B *• « • »• *'s;f. % • • * • ••• •t • • • • • ••. .. .*. »iL *•/. • .. I'* *•‘^* S.F.j *.. /• . .6.. Other • • • •.. •• mm • •• • - X .• •.*• • ... ■ Total Hardcover in Zone ^. - •• *1 •• •••'••'r- ^ I 4 Total Property Area in Zone • 45 -S.F. i •‘'m,F. L5J * •4^'' •n .•: _s _. •*. . 0. •» • r;)V..rv'--.'-vnY • 3570__B • I *• * • • ••s B 3570 X 100 ^ • A. » • J A "*l.?-6 S.F. . oy • .* • «4 1. ■■••', •T".'«i • ••• •• f, . • •• • HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zone : .(CIUCU ONE) 0-75'' (7^2^ 250-500' 500-1000' • Existing Hardcoveh in Zone . V' .' ‘9 ^ -i .D-^- • « • A. ' H ouse 238S S.F. LENGTH WIDTH . .1. S.F. •c 'i • f « S.Ft > • S.F. . - ' 3«.“ ; •• Black top"' “T •' driveway '* %V — - - . 12^.F. B. G arage 23.92 oo on S.F. • • Concrete c. D riveway \r (g) 120 V/s 19 SO 1500 - X 1628 D.. Sidewalk «308 S.F. © m s!f. © S.F. (© . . ‘.i . S.F. Ei Patio /. D eck •52.25 _ X . 522 S.F. — X • r* ^ ^ • /^S.Fr ’ F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN .BY ■ , . • PLASTIC SHEETING Timber 1761 ±S.F.' r«L. *« I ‘ * * _ ’ *' • • A 175 X __0^L__'stf .- @ Timber 106 0.5 ;•• ■•' -53 - ;.n: . Pool & Landscaping ‘ G.. Other ____ •. *, mm*» • • • • • , X __^__ •• ^i!£l_?.F. ;,(2)s: V • Total H ardcover in Zone .. - ’ % I - ^ j " Total Property Area "IN Zone "il'Osg S.F. • • ;* • n • 28OA0 * '.F. rr 12089 B _28040 X 100 , r J ‘ 43.U • • %■ “ ff- Curt.cc. ^ 3 o**'^ mmrn O ^ 7 5^ 0”7S“ / 9^S/t~t^y / /, HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET . SE^ACK zone : (CIRCLE WE)' 75^250' 250-5Q0'- SOO-IOOO; *. * • Existing Hardcover in Zone D-3 A. ' House * • mmm m 987 I*.'-S.F LENGTH • ^ ■ WIDTH S.F -1 VZ _ X S.F t; 1 ,. mm-*S.F a.•» •• r •.. . .0,^ » —.S.F. if B. Garage S'.F. c. D riveway ■-V - X . jjo2bjii_J; s;f.® •’It'sIC-- ■ *— • r'S.F. ..-''••.2.1:..9 '■■••, • • § • * # •• ••.. V •' ‘Jr* T • • • •• % «.r- • D.. Sidewalk . s. F. • • %4 - X S.F. or: : V« t \ i E.. Patio / . D eck T>n- 216' - .S.F .• L^-. S. ___S.F. • % F.Landscape .AREAS ^ • BY ■ PLASTIC SHEETING *> • ■'G. Other % A • • • ‘ X ..... • toto* to«^ to* .. • . * * X ■ =S ■ 905 S.F.do^”” X ••• * • • » • i.»to '* to. to to... • to — «^tototo ^ to- c Cs 5 • r • • . ...------------------------------■„ ^ .«,_________—S.F. , L • ... • «» Total Hardcover in Zone 4%» t •2697 ‘ S.F. ♦ • • W • • Total Property Area in Zone •JL.*.** • ‘ »10822 -• •' S.F _A i ..•i - w . % •. •: •*. to ).% • 2697 B 10822 • X 100 =* -_2L.22------- ' ; V* ■(•■•■■• . 1>Cb• • * 1 ’ • .<•/» •■ . I ♦ . *. 1 \ 1 1 '»' • # * • .-. N * 1 • .• - %y- ■■ ‘ X ^ K ,.*;**•; ., ;■■ * •'.. • :■•• '•:' .-.•;.cS; --------------------4 ("4^4 Jji' hVm;4’> i® if ,'^4 JmiM Iftis?s|^>^^18®* i*T • /1.4--.nV #'• - I <‘t X: «.; > \ \?:. /:.7 TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Mewrse. City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:September 8, 1993 SUBJECT: #1854 Troy Anderson, 1490 Long l^ke Blvd. - Variances - Public Hearing In February of 1993, applicant received apprc.sal of a side setback variance to allow a full second story addition over existing residence KKated 20 ’4" from east side lot line. Ihe proposed second story expansion did not involve additional bedrooms and remained at a 2- bedroom use level. Applicant now proposes a 26’x26 ’ garage to the north side of the existing residence retjuiring both side and rear setback variances. The tollowing ordinances are pertinent to this review: Zoning District LR-IA - Lakeshore residential Section 10.23, Subd. 6 (B) A. Rear yard setback variance Required = 50’ Proposed = 44’ Variance = 6’ or 12% B.Side setback variance Required = 30’ Existing = 20 ’6" Proposed = 16’ Variance = 14’ or 46.6% Brief Review' of Hardcover 75-250’ setback area = 10.450 s.f. Existing = 1,670 s.f. Proposed = 1,670 s.f. or 16% 250-500’ setback area = 21,950 s.f. Allowed = 6,585 s.f. or 30% Proposed = 3,949 s.f. or 17.9% Review of Lot Coverage Total lot area = 32,400 s.f. Allow'ed = 4,860 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 2,190 s.f. or 6.5% i rniirn in rnirir«nTiTi« ■ iinrr-TrTnmm*tr li«-i 7 i *■**1*-*^ Zoning File #1854 September 8, 1993 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Hardcover Fact Sheets 75-250 ’ E - H-rdcover Fact Sheets 250-500 ’ F - Pioposed Site Plan G - Legal Building Envelope H - Approved Site Plan with Application #1797 I - Resolution #3237 J - First Floor Plan K - Sepiic Map L - Elevations M - Floor Plan N - Letter from Property Owner - unsigned Description of Request Applicant proposes a 26 ’x26 ’ rear garage addition that will encroach the rear setback yard by 6 ’ and 14’ within the side yard. Review E.\hibits G and J, applicant was asked to determine if garage addition could be moved further west in order to reduce intensity of setback variance. Applicant claimed that the addition would block the main view windows of kitchen and portion of screen porch addition. Applicant has not provided a site plan showing location of driveway accessing garage. Staff has asked the applicant to provide an updated site plan for the current review. Anderson has advised that the existing drive to the west will be removed and new access will come from drive to cast. Hardcover fact sheet should be updated including backout apron in drivew ay and major reductions of hardcover with removal of drive. There are no hardcover concerns as there is only 17.9% hardcover within a zone that allows 30%. Review Exhibit K, garage additiini will require the installation of a new septic system. Applicant will be required to provide septic testing for a minimum 4-bedroom design. There is adequate area to west of property. In the review of Application #1797 that involved the second story expansion, the major issue for that review was the visual impact of the second story upon the residence to the east. Review Exhibit H. applicant was required to plant five 8-10’ high evergreen 7 ’ apart along the east side of the residence just to the west side of the existing drive. Review the east lot line upon your site inspection to determine if there is any impact of the garage addition to the rear upon the views from east. Staff has received only one letter from a neighbor who wished to remain anonymous (E.xhibit N). Zoning File #IS54 September 8, 1993 Paee 3 Hardship Statement Review Exhibits A, I, and G. there is no way to locate an attached garage addition and meet the rear setback. If garage was moved further west it would block die major view windows of the rear kitchen and portion of screen porch. The property is not served by a garage. Issues for Consideration 1. Is there a visual impact upon neighboring property owner to east with single stor>r aarace addition to rear - • is there a need for additional plantings? ^ W ^ 2. Will there be an impact upon propeny to the north? 3.Garage addition will be located 5' off easement (remember City does not have special setbacks for private driveway easements). Should addition be reduced in size to minimize intensity of setback variance to east side? Applicant should be asked as to need for oversized two stall garage (minimum two stall garage 22- 24*x20 ’). 4.Review Contlition 1 of Resolution (Exhibit I), plantings were to be completed by July 15, 1993. Applicant has not fulfilled condition of first review. Exterior of second story has yet to be installed, should permit for garage be issued until exterior wall is completed? If approved, your recommendation must be conditioned on the installation of a new septic system before garage permit can be issued. If strucmre is approved at a 16’ setback, will you require additional plantings (review E.xhibit H)? r • j u V. I%-r I . 7 ^ li-''/I- CITY OP ORONO ” VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change frcm original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) O K A<iJ ‘rt PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address / V ‘Z / r .A r, / ,, I; iS^ V Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required suruev. Date Prop^tty Acquired_ _ _> ^ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do)(dbnolJ also own the aajacent parcels of land. Present use of property; V residential - - -other (sped y) "oning District:_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT Name N roil j n Ph*"ne (home) Phone (worlc) ^ ^"^6^/7. Address:k'lD City: fhc}l0 _____ OWNER (if different than applicant) Ncime _______ -_________ Phone (home) Phone (worlc) Address:City:Zip: description OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $. 1/ Describe request in d.-^tail; f' (j(t 2G/Z6 variances required Lot Area Lot Coverage /V Setback: _ Lot Width ___ Hardcover Front ^ Side Rear ___ Average La)ceshore Other (specify) hardship/description of unusual PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual p i-»------ — - Jf0^UXIT0in0ritl^ • I Ions .preventing compli<I^ce/iwit^ If' « ^ f . pertyI r Qy\ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ^ All—of—yie—following information must be submiti-Aa k,. . jSSline date in order \or your annllcatlon to y Conpleted Application Fcnn List of owners within ISO- (you must obtain 348-327^"/'"’'’ Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center ^*-ty PLat Map (obtained with property owners list', ^■-^5®''J'^^Lcate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include rep1od°uctionK"*'''°'’‘^ =°P^ S.^Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if anv changes fi J cV existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8U"xll“) ‘ ^ 7'4-fre ‘ elevation views (provi'de > copy 8Vxll”l 7.g^As an addendum to this application, please attach a separa?^Ust of 8 ._Add^ tion" \nay“t\"e^“\1d °b^ r^r;th:t— information has not been includX^,' -- - --^ ^ above APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -- - - - - - ^ i"s Thri^:-f=ronsupplied is true and co^ct ty<he ^st of his/her Itnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWHERS SIGNATURE luthorTsVs ’’■■eastLt.f epplication and further agentr cLmfsf w®" P’^PP^'^ty by city staff, consultants, tion a^d verificrtion^rtMs^egrsf" P“-PP=P= investiga- Owner ■ s J _ _ _ _ _ Date |^U^7ST-23. PlaiirngVo“^‘ eubmittals into the City offices 25 days before the third Mond^^I^^^f ”®®PLng. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the review ^eetiLs of"t^ "T"'■ be present at all scheduled unable ‘o a trend * bbe Planning Comiiilssion and Council. If an applicant is authori-^ed agent att^^sieeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an Offi°r;f thfroH ‘be Building s Zoningurilce of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 01/20/93BATCN 004PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR 0I04ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONI^R NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR H£?2n:PIN COUNTY PROPERTY IHrORMATI»l SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST36 2A-118-23 33 00010146A LONG LAKE BLVO J N GARDNER A A L GARONER ANITA L GARONER 146A LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 5S3S6 38 2E-118-23 33 0005 01520 LONG LAKE BLVO 0 J SMITH IKS v^OriDALL 0 J SMITH i K S J0r40AU 1520 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-116-23 33 0020 00684 DAKOTA AVE J M BENIUY A K J GAST4ER JAl^T M BENHAY 884 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0029 01465 SIXTH AVE N HILLIAM R A BARBARA A PEAR:E HILLIAM A BARBARA PEARCc PO BOX 9300 I8>L$ MN 55440 38 35-118-23 22 0003 01509 LONG LAKE BLVO JAMES E COPLIN A HIFE JAMES E COLLIN 1509 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 004 00015 36 26-116-23 33 000201490 L0f4G LAKE BLVO T 0 ANDERSON A C A ANDERSON TROY A CATHERINE ANDERSON 1490 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55356 36 26-116-23 33 0006 01530 LONG LAKE BLVO GRANT D EGGENBERG GRANT 0 ECGEtBERG 1530 L0f4G LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55356 36 26-116-23 33 0021 00666 DAKOTA AVE 0 A C HOODIURO DAVID A CYNTHIA NOOOHARO 668 DAKOTA AVE taiG LAKE m 55356 36 35-116-23 22 0001 01485 IQtiG LAKE BLVO KURTIS A GREENLEY A HITE KURTIS A GREEriLEY 1465 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 35-110-23 22 0004 01505 LONG LAKE BLVO JAMES 0 WEYHE ETAL JAMES 0 WEYHE 1505 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55356 RCrORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 733 26-118-23 33 000401516 L0T4G LAKE BLVO CINDY J FREDRICKSON CINDY FREDRICKSON C/0 STATE DAriK OF LONG LAKE BOX 636 L0T4G LAKE MN 55356 36 26-110-23 33 0014 01535 L0t4G LAKE BLVO BERNICE ZUtOUSCH BERNICE ZUrtCUSCH . 1535 L0^4G LAKE BLVO L0!4G LAKE MN 55356 38 26-110-23 33 0027 01400 L0f4G LAKE BLVD ANITA A KEITH VAMOER BRANQEN K R VANOEN DRA^40EN 1400 LONG LAKE BLVD L0r4G LAKE MN 55356 30 35-116-23 22 0C02 01515 LONG LAKE BLVO L W CAPR0f4 ETAL W/L EST L W LaPRON 17505 OLD ROCKFORD RO PLYMOUTH MN 55446 30 35-116-23 22 0005 01465 L0T4G LAKE BLVO DONALD W LUT40 ETAL DONALD W LUNO 1465 L0r4G LAKE BLVO LOm LAKE UN 55356 C O e c V..’ c: •'i & C C- Q RUN OATC dl/20/9S ^ MTCN OOA k Kftcpiw cownr property imformation system PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI<iX5«0l RACE 8 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEFfTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESEHTATlOfl OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATC ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTllENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOMLEOGE AND BELIEF DATE -1t€i Aid D on c c c o i ■A I HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE cne ' 0-75' 75-250' /250-5C0'y5C0-1GGQ' Ek Io Ting Harzcover in Zone • • A. House S • F • LENGTH WIDTH / ^_ X /_3__= y95 ^ ■ l\x_..5_-7 S.F. X 7 E - - - -r- :? a V V “7;. S • F • X S.F. B.Garage 7. "r X ■ f ^S.F. r.Dp I vrwAY X / / _» tz> O S.F. V/r5v>/rr / 7 7 X //. / u 3S S.F. D. • SlZEWALX 2. S X - /55 S.F. X , S.F. X S.F. E.^ATIO/ 3ec :< X a .S.F. F.Landscape • X s S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN 3Y X S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X S.F. S.F. G. Othe .r Total Hardcoveh in Zone Total Property Area in Zone s , \ t < ^ ^ <P ^ ^ O S.F. S.F. S.F.B __^rTl_2125i2. X TOO = ^ '% • 4 HARDCO'/f?, QLCULATI0;i WORKSHEET setback z-ne: (ciecle cme) 0-75' 250-5C0' 5CO-IGCO' Existing Hardcover in Zone p House 2 A/X • \ LENGTH WIDTH \z <lo X !s } So - (V Y’A 1 n' .0,X 1^.3 .mz) m a LI * •' f X t ss X 3.Garage X • d • c. ./» n. Driveway f f !X ,! ^ • * 1 *3 t 1 i} / / i *1 f X . \7 0 SIpewalk X 1% W 4 ikV W V * ~ ka ^ X _< X mam J E. i ^ATIO/ Deck X s p. Landscape . - X mm *s AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X s PLASTIC SHEETING X mam s X 3 s G. Other X SS S Total Hardcover in Zone ,'/^To IOTotal Property A rea in /.one lo^so X 100 =(dP {o ^B S.F. S • r I S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.B Ol .0/Vo 6 Five pyramidal arborvitae evergreens are proposed as a buffer inunediately east of the applicants residence. The trees will be between 8' and 10' tall when planted and could grow to 30'. The trees will be planted approximately 7' apart for a continuous buffer. Page 5 of 5 • I CITY of ORONO RESOLITION OK THE CITY COLNCIL 3237NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIAJ^^^L TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 2.3, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1797 WHEREAS, Troy Anderson (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the properu' located at 1490 Long Lake Blvd. within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 3 and 4, Albee’s Long Lake Addition, Hennepin County, and that part of Government Lot 1, Section 26, Township 118, Range 23, tying East of a Ime drawn parallel to and 675’ East of. measured at right angles to, the Wes: Ime said Section -6 Ld West of the extension South of the most Westerly line of Lot 1, "Auditor s Subdivision Uo. 291, Hennepin Co’inry, Minnesou" (heremafter "the property’ ); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 2.3, Subdivision 6(B), to permit the construction of a second story addition which will encroach within the side yard setback. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES0L\T:D by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. This application w-as reviewed as Zoning File #1797. The property is located in the LR-IA Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewe d this application on Februaiy' 16.1993, and recommended approval of the pioposed variance based on the o owmg fmdings: A.The applicant’s lot is limited by its unusual shape which will not allow expansion of the existing residence to the east, south, west, an some portions to the north due to setback restrictions. Pace 1 of 5 \m o CITY of ORONO V RESOLLTION OF THE CITi COUNCIL NO. 3237 _________ B.The applicant’s expansion will not further encroach into the existing substandard side yard setback. C.The applicant has agreed to provide additional vegetative screening between his house and the neighboring residence to the east. The City’ Council has considered this application including the tmdings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City' staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety’ and welfare of the community'. The City Council finds that the conditioas existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that eranting the variance wo^uld not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard er other danger to neighboring property-; would not merely ser\’e as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary- to alleviate a demonstrable hardship -^r ditiiculty-; is necessary- to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant, and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. COiNCLUSIONS, ORDER AiND CONDITIONS Based on the above findings, the Orono City- Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 2.3, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a second story- addition to the existing residence within the substandard side yard setback, which will not encroach within the existing 20.4 ’ from the east property boundary-, subject to the following coriuinon'': 1.The applicant is required to provide naniral buffer of plantings between die addition and the neighboring residence to the east as shown on site plan/plantmg schedule attached to this resolution. Plantings must be completed no later than Julv 15, 1993. 2.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will Page 2 of 5 fwn iOB I r. //CITY of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CIT\' COUiNCIL NO.3237 e.xpire on that date (February 22. 1994). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms ;.nd conditions of the variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, succe.ssors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of Februarj’, 1993. ATTEST: ^Jj/l)iann Goeiten, Actinj^ MayorDorothy MfYIallin. City Clerk 'Property 6\vner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of Febrjary, 1993, by J. Diann Goetten Dorothy M. Hallin, Acting Mayor & City Clerk of Jie City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was e.xecuted on behalf of the City. NOTABY^PUEU(f • M^NESOTA~i Hennepin couNPr My cc.Tirr.ission expifM 6-12-90 \ Notaiy Public Paae 3 of 5 I . CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITi' COLiN'CIL 3237NO. STATE OF N1INNES0T.\ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENN'EPIN ) On this ^''day of i.-/;199 a before me a Noiar}' the foregoing instfumem. andlctoowlcdgcd th.t h= (they) executed the seme es tus (thetr) free act and deed. JAMIE L BOSMA NOTAAt PUeUOMlNNESOTA H£NNB»IN COUNTY MyCoflm.E*P'i*sT2-1M7 § o 0 y '(LdhA NOT*ARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Public the foregoing instrument act and deed. , and "acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free BETH McCOMBS NOTARY PUBUC4I1NNES0TA HENNEPIN COUNTY U)f CmrmMm Ei^irM Fib. to. 1937 m '^^OTARY PUBLICS Page 4 of 5 I«9 MO {>lft (kM . '.ST .m/ - .1- ,-. Is«ei7S ii U- Cor*:ificate of Survey for Troy Anderson of Lots 3 & 4, Alhoo's Long Lake Addition and in Cov•t. Lot I, Section 26-118-23 Hennepin County, Minnesota a N -4 t /$me 0/ fee. Z€ 0 f^y Ay^ 2ff M8^*4l'E line of Stc\iov\ ZC> TUe> Existing Legal Desetri rjtion Io^V ‘ipction 2fi "i^o A.3dition, Hennepin County and That part of Goveennient 67S feef raQ? of^' 23, lyinq F.ast of a line drawn parallel to and Sent nf'thl L? ' «n9les to. the West line of said sL-tion 26 and Ser25^ SenneSln\:f,nnJl\";i;:;Lo^^^ Subdivision thP^iinrth*^of ”l‘r'^"' existing *iousc and a driveway serving a parcel to o : Iron marker flcarinqs shown are based on an assumed datum. flfiOWfl sgpv ^ CITYOFORONO A g|j|: PI an __ GRADING PLAN F?AP!=nOVi:6 11,5.!’l-i:'iV ■!) V'’nil REVISIONS RV DAlL. ^ Coffin & Gronberg , Inc . I • ' •' '* . j, I >•. - 'I, Mnf«M. ^ L \\nuic » l»'ni;i.ik( M\ ' ' I. M Iff'K I* 1 Hereby certify thnt this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super- v.sion, and that I am a duly legistered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota. •l"J i.iMi.it.Kk \\nuic • l»>ni;i.ik( M\ bi: ir'l INI Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 DATE I - 9 - ^CALE r t 40 iDBNo. ^e-544 0-> _ crtJLJ s 1 1 ,: M 1 :1 »., ! ! d H 1j111 S '\^ iJ 1 i ; c:l 1 1 1 i ' i J_l_U-i-SaLn 2x4 PrcmiDuf. Floor Trusv^s ® 24- OC.' Equal -7^7^ Equal ■ii . 5 -v^ -V- V, -7^ 6‘ Opening Tl ^»» j I I I I -V Tim :. la 1 ' ‘i . . Pi __ nri . ■ ! : |iC _c — E T'.’"Cl • J • 1 ■—3 t i: .i d s , . 0) ; ^ ' ■ A I I 1 . I • . ♦ • •• **. • i*ii— ■ > ■ i»» %« »», I •-• »• »^ ^ ^^<i- ■. 'V i i‘4'-:• . .■ ,••i' ' i '• • •' ;• f^’ -|''T'' •'-}->r.■>i (tA *j,» .INSPECTION nECOno PUMPOUT necuno LOCATIONSKETCHDATECOMPLIANCEDATEgallons~7s/t2:i^L AJom>^/^r/V«r ASttz?ft? '>■* C» >}/'/ A/Vj 7-Ais3^T-/aat^a?S.fo-^c-'?t^ hoo n-t2~yr? /non1-/-J?. isao I I • .*.#:F • •. • .* r"#■ ••• a»r • f* •. ^«> • ••• ;V ; . • . • ^ • Vlv.^ - mu* • ■» rrc/iaYt?.. nSh — -nronf' OK. •I C - CONFORMING SUBSTANDARD N - NONCONF OfUllfJG icludr 1) Well locailt 2) Distance ft lOUtiC tank ijnd drainfr )m house to . dist. bon. Id 3) North arrow rind road • i '• t ; *^3 > I i .. * /•• • i‘Vi: ir\ 1 i;! »• •k*- • • • • • *-' ,» •» ' : •• •■••A.' V.,!i:?‘•.•• .■ i i . \r* .• *»» . * N*.*^ *» > V;« vrir'' ' ’ .1 ••• V I < • 7 ? • ■' I •'./ (j/l : f'»• . /, Planning Conunission Orono City Hall I City of Orono It is disturoing to see the request for annother variance for 1490 Long Lake Blvd. On the day that the letter arrived notify­ ing the neighbors of the last variance, work had already begun on the very project which was to be decided on! Even though that work was urgent enough to disregard codes and begin inunediately, it has still not been finished months later. It is only common sense that the original work on the house be finished before we begin annother project. The residents of ♦■his neighborhood have been looking at a unfinished, uncovered structure for at least five months. A glance at the number of variances requested leads L“* the question that the City Council should ask itself: Why do we have a building code when so many are granted permission to violate it? As for the specific case of 1490 Long Lake Blvd., At least require the last project to be completed before granting permission to create annother eyesore n f (• I ! • A Li SEP. 8 1965 r To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan ai.J Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorsc, City Administialor From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator September 7, 19^3 #1855 Paul Bowman, 3458 North Shore Drive Variance - Public Hearinc Applicant proposes the construction of a complete second story over the existing single story strucnire. A 10’ x 12’ entry addition will be installed over the existing deck along the west side. The only variance sought by applicant is a side setback variance along the east side where structure shall be expanded above existing lower level at a substandard setback at 7’ 2" (fireplace addition at 4’ 8"). The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: 1.Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B) - Side yard setback variance. Required = 10’ Existing = 7’ 2" Proposed = 4’ 8" (second story at 7’ 2", fireplace at 4’ 8") Variance = 5’ 4" or 54% 2. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total lot coverage — 1,532 s.f. or 13.3% (15% is allowed) 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover. 75-250’ setback area = 2,176.5 s.f. or 24.8% List of Exhibits A B C D E F G II I J K Application Plat Map Property Owners List Surx'ey Detailed Site Plan Provided the City with Deck Permit Issued 8/90 Neighbor’s Acknowledgement Forms Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250’ Setback Area Licensed Engineer ’s Report on Existing Foundation Elevation Floor Plan Cross Section \ t I I !■ immm !■■!» li-—t — rmi—r i i tiri 11T> i • O ". i Zoning File #1855 September 7, 1993 Page 2 Description of Request 'Fhe applicant proposes the installation of a second story over the existing single story structure with the expansion of a 10 ’ x 12’ two-stor>' addition over existing pt)rch (first level porch and second level closet area). The structure will meet the legal 30’ height shown at an average height of 27’. Review Exhibit I, the front elevation. At the highest point ot the strucnire, the height equals 31’. Height is determined from the lowest existing elevation to the mean or average height of the pitched roof. x 5’ chimney addition encroaches into the substandard setback area located 4 ’ 8” from east side lot line. Review Exhibit D, the second story will not encroach the average lakeshore setback line. Lot coverage is maintained at 13.3%. Hardcover is under the allowed 25%. Ihe only variance sought by applicant is the east side yard variance. The majority of the second floor expansion will not encroach beyond T 2" setback. Only the 5’ x 2'/2’ fireplace will expand into the substandard side yard. Statement of Hardship Review Exhibit A. Staff would add the following House was constructed prior to zoning standards for residential construction sometime in the 40 ’s. Applicant and former owners have applied for required permits when improvements were proposed. The only variance sought for the improvement is a side setback variance. The existing elevations and mature vegetation will minimize impact of second story expansion on residence to east. Staff has received no negative comments from neighbors who have signed Acknowledgement Forms. Review Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration Will you allow the further encroachment of the substandard side yard by a 2Vi' x 5’ chimney? Can fireplace encroachment be reduced? CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION _ \ \ Initial Application Fee $175.00. ($50.00 p^r each additional v^ariancej Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) I PROPERTY INFORMATION - w •* T. U Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.).—HI Attach legal description to application if not T7T^ (month/year) .. » . V Date Pr I (do)( Present also own the 4dj^ent parcels of land^ L/<^xesidential ___of property other(specify) Zoning ni strict; 'L^ICL- - APPLICANT Maine Phone (home) 1 Phone (work) Address ; A)n,'lT^ City; Phone (home)^_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _—OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (work) Name Address;City:Zip; DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_^^So, ooO Describe request in detail^ ^ a ilmo aw&mai - /logg- Ar>h.TL VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ Lot /^rea ■^/setback; Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Front \/(s^7\verage Lakeshore Other (specify) ^SaiP/DESOTIMlON OF ONUSDAI. PROPERTY COWJTTIONS FT cii 11V 3nd unusual property Describe undue hardship or Lning Code requirements :________ conditions preventing ^omplian /PXiZ. f^er£jt>M - r;t-riA^. A C /lAiir-rMAAi n Tn->T r. ^ 1 /? •n f 19 • * (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ^ All of 1. iXccimpleted Application Form FlJl^^Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150 (you must ob-ain 34 8-3271^ Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center ^Plat Map (obtained with property owners list) 4. j^Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include reproductioT)^^^^^^^°"^ required (provide one (1) copy 8J5"xll" for 5. _4^Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes . ®^^sting grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%'’xll"). of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8J5”xll"). 7.^As an addendum to this application, please attach a separatriist cf o ° persons you wish notified of this application, o.N^/^Additional items as may be requested by Citv staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please variance application is not complete if the above j-nrormabion has not been included, ---------------------------- mm • • mm mm mm tmm ^m mm mam « ____ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the infoi^ation supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date _ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiaa- tion and verification _oil.jtbi^ request. Owner's Signature Date 2 Applicant must have all submittals into the Cit;y offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission Md Council. If an applicant is attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. { • »*^. • «* m^--€ m m • ' - • •• • ' \y^ ■ ^ ^ ‘ ► ^ .IV i *^?* • * ♦ * if **^ **. i' *•* ., -V •••«,• A - \v-J • j^_- . •.- * * • • ^r. . .»*.•.< •<*».••* •• ^ •,‘.W .^- *• > « •->. •-•. • «•'!*■ • *:>*•'* ■ ,f . • 4 .*.4 . *^ • • ■ •Vi :’ :4 • . .•■ -• .* * • .•^ *■ . i . •* ^'< *--^4 K - W ' V. ^ ''*^ JjSuf t* ^ ’-^ *x •***'•^'.>^ ‘* >i ■ a • • • ^ • . . • **■ * V •» , ‘'ikr. y , ^ ' .4 *f^ * -T • • • • , ’.iV . ' - —• « •#• p-X*' ip« ^ ’.■• • -*-'■ '• . .- • .• Z- '•i -2 r|rP» •• . \ - .•«. •;•*■ . . -. -A ‘ -. • ‘ •• •‘•s’-' r • ' T ‘ •* • ■ . ■ '* /... Si. V. ^ \-.'V *. * . ♦».«•*• ‘^'^r < V* *"• "k-.: , • *. .♦ Vvr.-..r. • •* • -• ..r r«>--r v -.%- ' > • %. v.v-'*“> V • '• . •* / 4^ .»• ,« ,* •« A V- iV .t; I •.*•»..- '.•. .. > .% .•'- I/.* •: •. -• v*'.-.,- - r ; % 4 •; • * r .* .?•*** *• - • * - ,• %■'•*.*.' k . T - •i.f'.r.-:,*p^i.v •;. <•,-..♦ >..I^ .>**v . » * . :• • • ^4* “ “*j»» ■•^»^r'‘^..*’’ ** ■' • • ♦ »4 V . ^. * ^ "‘ ,’^ • ' *»'’' *'•♦•/ * ,»V * • . . * JL' * 4*- ' - • *, • *•• . * * . ^‘. ' ' **** - ’. •• '.V .•-■■■• .*•• ;-.■;•-■■■ ■• • ;• '.•■.•2'.’••*•■»• ’ • ...............• 1 » • •• 11 fr Ml I C505 4 • ________ WW>M« KUN DAT! 9B/lh/nBATCH 005raOB ADOR QMNEII NAME TAXPAYER NAM/AOOR SR 06-117-ES 4S 0001 03A70 BIRCH LA REX EUGENE BOLLINGER JR REX EUGENE BOLLINGER JR SA70 BIRCH LA NAYZATA MN 55391 PROP AOOR OmER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SB 06-117-2S AS OOlS OSABO NORTH SHORE DR BRUCE A NUSBAUH BRUCE A NUSBAItl SABO NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 /.t PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ABOR SB 0B-117-ES A3 0021 0SA50 NORTH SHORE DR NILLIAM C ODOEN NILLIAM C ODDEN SA50 NO S»;ORE DR NAYZATA m 55391 A'' ) PROP ADBR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR SB 08-117-2S AS 002A OSAAB NORTH SHORE DR JIN ERLER JAMES I MARY ERLER SAAB NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA MN 55S91 •ii PROP AOOR CM€R NAME .TAXPAYER I NAME/ADOR V SB 0B-117-2S AS 0027 OSAAO BIRCH LA R NILLIAM TONARO ETAL R NILLIAM TONARO SAAO BIRCH LA NAYZATA MN 55391 HEffffPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMAT10T4 SYSTEM PROPERTY OUTERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA35A01 PAGE 1238 00-117-23 A3 000203A90 BIRCH LA E LILJEQUIST I S LILJEQUIST tRIC J « SHELLY R LILJEQUIST S490 BIRCH LA NAYZATA m 55591 58 08-117-15 «5 OOlC05470 r«3RTH SHORE OR HAROLD J BROUELLETTE HAROLD J BROUELLETTE 5470 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA W 55591 38 08-117-25 45 0014 03490 NORTH SHORE DR KENTON H CARLSON ETAL KENTON H CARLSON 5498 NORTH SHORE DRIVE NAYZATA HN 55591 38 08-117-23 43 0020 05442 NORTH SHORE OR GERALD J* RAY ETAL GERALD J RAY 5442 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA MN 5559L 10 38 08-117-23 43 0022 05444 NORTH SHORE DR NILLIAM 0 ROBINSON N 0 ROBINSON 3444 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA m 55591 58 08-117-23 43 0C23 01450 BIRCH LA E R ENGLER S 8 ENGLER EDUARD R > BOttllE ENGLER 5450 BIRCH LA NAYZATA HN 55391 10 .*• . ■ 58 08-117-23 43 0025 03458 NORTH SHORE OR P E 80I«1AN ABO 8LADER PAUL 80»t1AN/BARBARA 0 BLADER 3458 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-25 43 0026 05460 rK)RTH SHORE DR JOHN G NELSON ETAL JOHN NELSON 3460 NO SHORE DR NAYZATA MT< 55591 •**5 TOTAL BATCH 005 00013 \ ) :) 5 • MM OATE IM/lA/93iATCN 005i 1 ■ f J > ) I > I 4 4 \ •' f f. •• ‘ t-'*’ I ’V. 2»:. { 4siii MErtItPIN COUNTY PHOPCRTY INFORHATIOT4 SYSTEM PROPERTY O^tlERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA55<#01 PAGE 13 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEffTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEH4EPIN COUNTY OEPARTOENJ OF PROPE^^AXATIONo TO JOE BEST OF MY KNOHIEDGE AND BELIEF. DAT ♦ • j. ‘ • i i ■ ■'ft, I! <j;I . i!. i t « ( • ■ * ? ' j . j O CITY OF ORONQ # bU' * “N ■y ci3 \ in i<o Certificate cf £ur\-cy for Thcri^s L. Arx^irraa ^ ^ i:;^vciard ’s Park ” Lake HinncK^n.-s^ Hennepir. County, Miruiccowu ?Tr?f *,*p^ 1.,.-\ * . ‘ '■te' ' 'r- 5-V • • K ) ^SE3l_^ QO .7^'CK Oi I hereby certify that tr.is is « . and correct recrese^,^3. on^o.^^a^.u h», ft''.’ of the boundaries: of that part cf tat trt S;.-;tar;eTiri::Lbr-L; e.te..io. •• rMno*nnv ’fcL Ivinr Sovi'Lno^iS t snc ^-r.sk.c. -r.:? 0t.eyi.P:0ve location of all eiiiatine cu-U g^ev, the "Northeacuerly naai cents or encroachments, ror i.^rtneasteriy cf a line ^nrougr a has been ascumec -o ce ----- ua- sur^e,> , -------------- • Sr^:; ILiLfL be -rt_cr^e.ic and finrrSriLld ii^r-ra;!., ^r.u.l «ltfc ..« J sou... vesterly lines. :0oi Scale Da te o 5C ’1 ” Iron narke ^ J*** Land Sur'.'eycr and Planner Lons Lane, Miru;esc'.a FX-T.* 'W'^ r ^i« ■■%« r-.<^r .> :lAa »•. :’;...-r —--I *. t-j-T- •: r I*-, *♦ ' t ’t .••.*»**••V ^ 1 "i'. v‘!:^v; # * “"'r -a’**.:t ®v»*.• r-*;*!,* •. •* •■• !r |21 > (U > in InA)o _rr -J -0 13 I (we) Adjacent Property Owners- Acknowledgement Fora nXtAPs [print name(s)][print address] t- , 1-h^. nronosed improvement or proposed use of the property^Totated Wf iV^.._ also referred to as Land Use Application No. _ _ _• I (we) understand that in executing this ^^^"VrtVL^’use (are) not as)red to declere approval or ^ trermrroveren;°p\^Ts^"d\\%t tL proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. / Property Owner \Date / 6 DateProperty Owner/»«• -. •• A. a*. ' -Vy/•. V. ..r/ '■ *:,} ; » *• «*»• •* ' ’ *• ' *. •• V '' VV. • ■ ■• ^ .‘:a-■'*’r '*i i.. ^ ^ • I --1^* • ^ *-• - . .• \ g • „ ». ”.••••, . . ••. > . « • • • ;•. ••.‘■: ’ V' ■ . !-'v-a'.- ‘ . :.. *V'} ,y \ Vv/;" . * ■ • *.w^/ ^- • ’. . . '. ■ .V. * • -■■ ' - - \vv. • .-. ■• . •:••••••*:;■.?;>-5-V*.,-••■•- •• • ’ • -•. —*. *■--•• .. - . . ■ •» '■i.-'V ■*. ''J Va* > cn > KJ\ O s -xr Oo N :t ..V .• * ,'**•.*•• - ■ f' ;.; V, ‘..»r■ > • .« i 4 • • $ * * •!•“ - • •-:‘'-.0 -- .* • r*V:' • , - • •• » •• • *I s (o //x/ ^ /?4 /[print name(s)j of ^^60 /ji. S'A C?_/ > /T?[print addresshave reviewed the plans for the proposed improve.Tient or proposed use of the P’*operty located at 3A?P^TH Slid • also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare~approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the .improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 1 - 7J Property Owner Date 71'rtf - ‘Y ~ ^6 / w Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 6 Zoning Office at least 10 days prior co the scheduled meeting date. • ** •‘-r* ‘ I n . " . ’.f •iV n Vt' ’ ■ '3'^-x ■ v.-*7'• G ’ !;• . ■- ' * r * •' ■ HARDCOVER CALCULATICN WORKSHEE 5-.I. - .• .’a .• #•setback ZONE: (CIRCLE i . ' v^'Existing Hardcover in Lo A. House . length 250-500' 500-1000' /V WIDTH U/BU- Pl^X 3. Garage • j/H c. D riveway /7 V X D. Sidewalk 7 i% ^ <S IX - E. Patio / D eck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other "Total Hardcover in Zone ^ % "Total Property A rea in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S • r • 6 S.F. /r S.F. c S.F. 3 c * w'S.F. Oo S.F. P-Qp/___ S.F. VL2->,^^s.F. Pr S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. 'S7Sb S-.F. A i W <1 ox .ijT} g?<^ Y 100 . av^<ff ' '% r RE: Property I.D. No. 08-117-23-43-0005 3458 North Shore Dnve. Orono MN 55391 To whom It may concern: o The above refcrericcd project was inspected March by myselt, at the request ot the seller. The purp< se of the inspection was to analyze the structural inlej:rit> of the foundation and to analyze the ability of the c-Xistm^ Structure to support one additional floor. The existing structure is founded on an eight inch concrete masonry wall that extends 36 inches into the ground and sits on a 18* X 8- continuous concrete footing. The existing wall in the areas that were exposed to my inspection appeared to be sound, without cracks or any loss of section. The foundation wall extended appro.ximately 16 inches above the undisturbed ground. The ’1991 Umform Building Code ’ Section 2907 (b) Bearing Walls sutes: ’Bearing walls shall be supported on masonry or concrete foundations or piles or other approved foundation system which shall he of sufficient si.re to support all loads. Where a design is not provided, the minimum foundation requirements for stud bearing w ills shall he set forth in Tabic No. 29-A." TABLE NO. 29-A FOUNDATIONS FOR STllD BEARING WALLS-MLM.MUM REQUIRE.MKNTS Nuniber of Fl«xTr» Supported by the Foundiiiofi (including rooO Thickness of Fouxtdatioii Wall CuKbes) Concrete Unit Masonry W'iJih of Footing (inches) Thickness of Footing (inches) 15 7 Depth Below Undisturbed Ground Surface (inches) As stated above these are minimum foundation requirements where a design is not provided. Therefore, a thoiough analysis should be made when one additional floor is added, to check that allow able foundation and lateral pressures have not been exceeded. If any further information is rco ired you may contact me at: Bradley J. Skow, P.E. Associate Barrientos Sc Associates, Inc. 1001 Twelve Oaks Center 15500 Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata. MN 55391 Phone: 473-1676 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SIGNED: DATE: ^REG. NO.:__18520 ■ 1. 1 ... «. lu * i httm HiW ^i IFIIW t ■ fftm ■ iT ii iii ■ w OWS4MJ IOTMCE”viesA/ 10 10 H v»4»^tA%^«aaM4%i4Mv4ut I ta .. <MiOtr«lM*ftv.U^ n r ■ Vs RE.'’ A . « ta ; e^Tt^ C^MHNe.y Mew Z* r^nre ^ SJIPe L*iSMT' iML. J;*' % ■ --; ■; J rf ... .. V^ • PPSW!^' *«5 fO y\4 1 y o 0 V*l,^ C7I C X-T-VC-l.T .C2* r. 'H Ts v*» ^ *r> t C ^ iV^ -W, I .- «;»•' •"/ * 2* .; \ r. {- t} ■ ■.t ■iri riliiiai 7, To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanjie A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator Date:September 7. 1993 Subject:#1856 Mark and Jenny Prueter. 3215 Cr\ stal Bay Road Amended Variance Application - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC Total lot area = 12,174 s.f. Easement area = 11,474 s.f. Total lot area exclusive of Crx'stal Bay Road The applicant proposes a 10 ’ x 26’ first floor addition with a 20 x 5 attached deck and 6’ X 5 ’ enclosed entry addition to the rear requiring side yard setback variances. The original application proposed an 18 ’ x 26’ rear addition with a 10 ’ x 4'/i’ deck included within the 18 ’ X 26’ addition. A front replacement deck/stairs replacement strucmre is now proposed at 12’ X 14’. The original variance application was proposed at 13x 18 ’. Side yard setback remained at approximately 3’. For the replacement deck, the average lakeshore setback is reduced from 9‘/V to 8 ’. Hardcover was approved at 29.4% (Planning Commission had originally approved 30.2%) with the original application. Applicant now proposes 29.5% hardcover within the 75-250 ’ setback area (existing is at 29.4%). A new issue for the current proposal is the need for a height variance as code specifically states strucmre may not e.xceed 30’ in height or Vh, stories. The lower level is exposed more than 50% and is considered a hill story. The strucmre is technically three stories but measures less than 30’. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: 1. Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B). A.Rear addition - west side yard Required = 10’ Existing = 6’ Proposed = 8’ (original 6’) Variance -- 2 ’ or 20% B.Rear addition - east side yard Required = 10’ Existing = 9 ’ 6" Proposed = 7 ’ (original 7 ’) Variance = 3’ or 30% ------------. I I- II It rrT-tm-TrmrtllkTti ■ ft ltlBllf)l|l T 'P'h Zoning File #1856 September 7, 1993 Page 2 5. C.Replacement deck - side yard. Required = 10’ Existing = 3’ ^ Proposed = 3’+. (original 3’ 4J Variance = 7’ or 70% Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback. Existing = 12’ Allowed = 0’ Proposed = 8’ (original 9’ 6") Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover, A.0-75’ setback area = 3,2(X) s.f. (3,900 s.f. - 700 s.f.) Allowed = 0 Existing = 607 s.f. or 18.9% Proposed = 552 s.f. or 17.2% B.75-250’ setback area = 8,274 s.f. Existing = 2,431 s.f. or 29.4% Proposed = 2,448 s.f. or 29.5% (original application approved by Council at 29.4%) Net increase = 17 s.f. or .2% 4. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage for lots less than 1.99 acres. Total lot area = 12,174 s.f. Existing coverage = 1,426 s.f. or 11.7% Allowed = 1,826 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 1,649 s.f. or 13.5% Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (A) - No structure or building shall exceed 2'A stories or 30’ in height. Struemre is defined as 3 story structure although total height measures 29’ 6", review Exhibit A/Front Elevation. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Hardship Statement •t- Zoning File #1856 September 7, 1993 Page 3 E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - Existing Survey Survey for Application #1822 Survey for I^roposed Application #1856 Hardcover Fact Sheet Existing Hardcover Fact Sheet Application #1822 Hardcover Fact Sheet Proposed Application #1856 Elevations Existing Basement/First Floor Plans New Baseinent/First Floor Plans New Second Floor Plan Detailed Structural Site Plan Anderson Letter 8/11/93 Resolution No. 1387 Description of Request The applicant’s current proposal requests a 10’ x 26’ first Boor addition and a complete 26’ X 34’ second floor addition. To the immediate rear of the 10’ x 26’ first floor expansion, a 5’ X 20’ open deck with an enclosed 5’ x 6’ entr>' addition is proposed. The replacement deck/stair structure is at the lakeside of residence wl ere the original application approved in June proposed a 13W x 18’ replacement deck and stair structure. Refer to Exhibit G. The average lakeshore setback will now be encroached by only 8’ by the replacement deck . The struemre at the west side will encroach no closer than existing 6’ and will end at 8’. The east side yard setback remains as original application at 7’. Hardcover originally approved at 29.4% is now proposed at 29.5%. The issue for the current review is the need for a height variance as structure consists of three stories that does not exceed a 30’ height. Please review Exhibit P. Mr. Anderson’s letter reports no problem with the proposed new addition that will be located 7’ from his side lot line. The City has received no comments from the property owner at the west side where the southwest corner of addition will be located 8' from side lot line. Hardship Statement Review Exhibits D and Q. Issues for Consideration 1.The three-story structure will be located as close as 3’ at the west side lot line and 7’ to the east lot line. At your site inspection, review the structures on either side. Will the 29’ 6" structure have an impact on the adjacent properties? Owner to the east claims no impact. Zoning File #1856 September 7, 1993 Page 4 2.Refer to hardcover fact sheets I and J. A.Entrance deck tnorih side) is proposed at 9* x 10 ’ wheie original proposal showed it at 7’ X 10*. Why is there a need to return to the 9’ x 10 ’ entrance deck? B.The front walkway is shown at 135 s.f. where in Application #1822 it was proposed at 72 s.f. Note back walkway has been reduced to 105 s.f. in the current proposal and in Application #1822 was shown at 159 s.f. .^pplicant should be asked if entrance deck can be reduced to 7’ x 10 ’ and if front walk can be reduced to 72 s.f. This would result in a reduction of 83 s.f. or 1% of total hardcover now amended .it 28.5%. Other Considerations Any condition of approval must contain the condition that hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection before new construction. Note Exhibit G the proposed site plan shows drainage being directed to east side yard where an existing drainageway drains to the lake. Applicant shall create drainage swale directing drainage to existing drainageway. Applicant shall provide a detailed grading and drainage plan for staff to review at the time of the issuance of a building permit. V 1 ft f III ifirnaiMOi ifc ■ w III III > : *JY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATI O ^oo -w?fV nitial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.Ou per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address * 2./S' Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) /T’/ZV 2-T / O Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do)tido ngt-l^also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT Phone (home) ^ "^9 J V Phone (wor)c)' _ _ _ _Name Address; •? 2-/^^ City;_ _ __ _ _ __r_ ___^ - -nrz-mrr.Zip; OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Ncime Phone (wor)c) Address ;City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^ Describe request in detail;— VARIANCES REQUIRED - - - - - - - - - - - - -y'-- - - - - - - - - - -ru- -- -- -- - - - - - - %- - - -A' 'y^s'/.v ,y<r. Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage etbaclc:Front Side Rear Average Lalceshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code reouirements: A'Bi'r ■.h*ii 11. I.'ll - f M.^nrk • «a .ktitv n.n.-w l 'Mk tflir «.t im r (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1,_ _Completed Application Form 2. ✓Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list frcm Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gcvt Center 348-3271). ' 3. y/Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. /Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8H"xll** for reproduction). 5. / Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 855"xll"). 6. _jXs)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8>j''xll”). 7. y As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowleJges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of in/estiga- tion and verificacion of this request. ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _Owner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. HUN DATE 0a/0{/93BATCH DOSMOB ADM ONNEB NAME TAXPAYER . NAME/ADDR »* * ♦ PROP ADDR Olt€R NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR * C •• i' ) PROP ADDR ONNER NATH TAXPAYER ^NAHE/AOOR > ‘ )•"/r PROP ADDR , ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR ^ • * S- IV- ‘‘'Y ' ^ t • T *ix ‘ j r • 1 . - \1 ‘* HCmEPIM COUNTY PROPERTY IKFORtUTION SYSTEM PROPERTY OttlERS LIST5S 17-117-2S Al 0008 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSIG^IEO RAJ BERSIE ROBERT D BERSIE 51ST NDRTHVIEH RO NAYZATA HN 555^1 SO 17-117-2S Al DOll 0S7D5 CRYSTAL BAY RD R A ANDERSON t L 1C ANDERSON RICHARD ANDERSON BOX 1S5 MINNETONKA BEACH HN 55S6X 02 U-117-2S 52 0015 DS1S6 NORTHVIEN RD EDYTHE BROm MISEL EOYTHE PROMN MISEL 51SA NORTHVIEN RO NAY2ATA HN 55591 02 U-117-25 52 00^0 05159 NORTHVIEN RO RAJ BERSIE ROBERT D BERSIE 5159 NORTHVIEN RO NAYZATA MN 55591 • f * . ‘ f V .. 1. REPORT NO. PIA55A01 PAGE 758 17-117-25 A1 000905255 CRYSTAL BAY RO OUWAVIIE L SCHIDILIA Af© HITE DUNAYNE L SCHIBIUA 5255 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA m 555R1 58 17-117-25 A1 001005215 CRYSTAL BAY RD MARK R PRUETER MARK R PRUETER 5215 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA mti 55591 50 17-117-25 A1 0012 05255 CRYSTAL BAY RO C NIUIAM IWIFE Ar© HITE C MIUIAM HOIFE 5255 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NAYZATA HN 55591 50 17-117-25 41 0014 05265 CRYSTAL BAY RD LEROY J ERGER A NIFE LEROY J ERGER 5265 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA m 55591 o 82 16-117-25 52 0014 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO RICHARD A A lEESA K Ar©ERSON RICHARD A A LEESA K At©ERSON 5205 CRYSTAL BAY RD BOX 155 MirtlETONKA BEACH m 55561 82 16-117-25 52 0054 00002 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO RICHARD A A LEESA K A1©ERSQN RICHARD ANDERSON BOX 155 MirtlETONKA BEACH MN 55561 t • TOTAL BATCH 005 QOOlO 1 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INTORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HE»#ICPIN COUNTY OEPARn»ENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE^BEST OF HY K^40IILEOGE A(40 BELIEF. DATE ■■ ■ :\ \ \ \ XC 'O I .(54) \^1- JO * <»'';iiV r.'.** y'l (!0) lv\< #\Q'^t >«9 A / '' i |(t0 ii 13)L ^ % ^yvyyyyKr -^' ^ C I*’ N »3/ •-*. V^w V •? * ft ^ ( 13)y< C9) (31) .' ’« (35) .-r^s» j . s- ■) :■< To) v*C coc »<c •<:£ I • «£**.= A.sCc'^'«^ C# LOTS 4?. 43, 57. a. a. -3. 70 4 7\ tHL*:£*s 4c:n:cs lo nii^ Cf ym7>#A 3EO. 1 j i 14 ^ C5)• ^R- • •" 1 •wo (62)1 * • •• •'■‘T3C)(32)(34)(33) 4!3T7tC-7 \ 1 iV* ♦ • • • 'C'? (• '\! \"'H‘ IIJ wise. » 351)^ \ A "\Z3)> \tA A(«\(oa*5^-Wv5^\ / ' iii : ;v,' .;.;.5- •;. •.•Hi"'-' .'.;. , ;v ■ .-i-i i'V* ,■■■•. A.ii*i- ’' ■■■• . . ■;( -‘. -:'s ;7-f;.¥u'v?®■•-■■■'>. a. ^ i'. ■•.;■ r ■’■ %>;. ■•;?; ■ :■.. / •*.'» ••; .: ■ . n»i 9 ((?>■ Wi-O’ /' • p«r Of'* ‘ (29)p>^(»)r (A 67 ^ ,‘ 4 (61)'^1-! i (• .1 Ji • >4 •0 C S4(24)(59)• •» 1 *4'*43 1•• ®I! vl't 10-8 0) -^'V V (M_^ (57)^ ' S (56)- J (69)115)\ ipn S - •% OLD COUNT'r RD m^r;7::>v:y:y:»(^>0 f6 ^*M*53 £NT^ RD « 4' ■'‘' "’ . maSJ ..Rif. i-«W. < • .^> •. I ., - •’ ••«”, ■; .* f I-;.'."'-:''...' '. -v ^4S'-.. i' ' ■■■>'■ K '. ;-'V- •ly • • ’. • . ••■• ■ ■.'•:’}i-i‘v .• ;•' • - ■ •••.*•• v''3#?v ' A- ■••■•■• ■ • -' *y4 m:-..v V - : • •'• .*:v>v^f ‘. -•■.i' y #.•:»• ^.•? J ' * . • r •. • •. *1 . . .-. . • \ Z’^Jai * : • » •• #'•» .Jp $ I'li i t • ' • •'; • ; r^. y’r ■M. ■-.VR'V'* aa•4* « & J R ^ • iV V &• ‘ ;} : f V * r*. • '.J p'Hr • •• ... ..\i^i.rvi- 4. . 1 •h. ' f • I. ’V A I • . i. • *1* * I »• r A / / # fTJu £r:* ^ HARDSHIP S>'Vf,'ral ch.ii actorist i cs ot this propert'’ inhibit th*=> ibitlitv to nieot the 25^ (75 *“250* ) hardcover 1 mill ut ion and set back ro<^uii rment s . [ «• A. b. C. D. Home constructed prior to exisMns Tionitu; t equ i remenls. Thus making it extremely dilitculi lor proposed addition t »• comply with these regulations. No additional 1ind available tor expansicn. Ihus elleclitig our complaince to the hardcriv er and sidt* set bu k re'tuii ement s. Shape ot Lot: With the lot becoiuining progressively nitrovi*r trom lakeshore to rear, this limits the area on wnich to buiid. Theretore restricting the design to add more liv.ihle space to our home. The topography ot the lot, le. steep slope at rear creates poor drainage and necessitates the need tor tlie back w,i 1 k’/ay, theretore inhibiting hardcover comcliance. • . rikj ‘rf* 1. 'W. , I L< - -^..-^1.■ .■ .-iw-kna I i'■ ITTf ilfc »I in''t iMi ■ ' I ■J ? rr ,-n^ 'Jiw^ ^ v\ •V THIS ITEM HAS BEEN MICROFILMED Pint o'” r.ri:-'0 ’ for Stov®:'. A. Havorb^r/ in Lot 1, 31oc'<2 Tcvr.Eit? i’^rn*^■'•in C-urtv, J'inn-sota Certificato of I hof-'b;* that this is a tr*:»' tr.fi •'orr'^ct represert;itior of a sur~r^r/ of tho b;'’in'*.'.;riea n*' that part of Lot 1, Ploo’< ?, of that *:xjrt of 'fortnorn Avon’:*, row va’catoci, Towr.aita of Larrrion Park, fiesrrited as '**ollo\-s; to—wit: Coroner.cin? at th^ o^lnt of inter­ section of the Fortherl” line of tho ri^ht^f-wny of the Great ?:crthern Bjil-wav Crnnary with the So’jtherly ex ­ tension of the '>ivlr!lnr line between Lota 1 ar.h 2 in sain ^lo'*> 2, Lan^on Park; thence Northwesterly alonf the divldir.f line bet*-een said Lots 1 and 2 and sane extended, q distance of 21?.14 feet; thence Korth-asterl'.' ceflertinr ri^ht at an angle of 82°55' fron last described course, a distance of 180 feot to the ecttial ocint of beginninr of the tract of land to be described; thence continuing free oaid act-aal noint of berlnninr Ncrtheasterl ' cn the extension of said last described line, a distance of 60 feet; thence Southeasterly in a streif’-'t lln-J 263.2 ,, tiuh i; UO f«t Ncrth,.=t,rly, »n=.re<i ,lor.f th.^rort.erly line o- snid railroad riyht-of--v/, fror the ini.is. r^ln- of co^ r.encer.cnt; thence Southwesterlv alonf- said fj*' lino “^5 feet; thence Northwesterly In a straight line 247. / .. to the actual point of he?inring; ALSO including all that ° Lot 1 in said Block 2 lying between the Northwesteri.y line of the D-enisc- hereinabove described and the shore of La.<e Manneton^j, Ld t^tZ-e.n the Northerly extension of the ^'orthcastcrly tnd Soutot-eeterly tio, lines of the orocises hereir.above first descrioev.; and the location o. all existing buildings thercor. It docs not puroort to show other inprovenents or encroachrant.^;. Scale Date o 1" = 40' Iron rorker W/i WJ/JlGordon H. Col tin Lard Sur*/eyor and Plar-ner Long Luke, Kinnosota 6C*i4 II aftiLiiaii / .7 .7 'J -1 nr" t, J jr S K 1; -» THIS IT£^ HAS B££fi AilCROFiLMED rl-'.ro^ for Stover. A. !!aver*':''‘r?’ in Lot 1, rloc< 2, Tcur.sit> Her.r.e nin C.runty, Certificate of Sur'/oy: I herory certify thet this is a tr*;o •tr.d '•orrcct , i-i ^ ^reoresert-'i .l'*i of^ the be'CO‘.*3 “ of a 3UT o Tcur.rlto c: j <'''•>*V, V ' <' c* “• ^ 'V'C- '>V -, .. r^rt of Lot I, f’loo’' ?, ar.-i of that oart o'' *forthorn .i’* row vacates, To-Tclte of L/ir.'*dor! Park, describe'^ as 'ollo'-*; to-wit: Corcner.cin? . t th^ p«^int of intor- sftctior. of the Northerly lino of the rifiht-^f-u-ay of the Great t’orthem PaiU-av Cennanr vlth the Southerly ex­ tension of tho -ivldlr.r line tetve-n Lots 1 and C ir. said ^loc> ? Lanpion Park; thence Northwesterly aiony the dividing line between said Lots 1 and 2 and sane extended, o distance of 217.1^1 feet; thence Korth»asterlv deflectin" rl<;ht at an angle of 82°55' fron last described course, a distance of ISO feet to the actual ccint of beginninr of the tract of* ianri to be described; thonce continuing, »rcn sa^d actual noint of beginninr Northeasterl** cn ».he ex-s-.sion o'* ca'd l»st described line, a distance of 60 ^eet; thence Southeasterlv in a str3-iy-.t lino 2A^.^ feet to a point in the line of said’right-of-way of the Gi-.t 'lorthern P^ilv-ay Conpany, which roint is lAO feet Ncrthe-usterly, rr:eo3urec along the I'ortherli line o'* s.Tid railroad right-of-way, fron the initial point of cor>- rence.'Tcnt; thence Southwesterlv along said Northerly right-of-way line 35 feet; thence Northwesterly in a straight line 24/.7 feet to the actual p^-int of beginning; ALSO including all that ?^rt of Lot 1 3'*d Block 2 Iving between the Northwesterly line of the srerdees hereinabove described and the shore of Lake Minnetonka, a-d b'‘**'een t''e Kort-'erl*' extension of the Ncrtheasterly and Sou»h-ester-y s.ce lines of the oronises hereinabove first described; and the location of all existing buildings therccr. It docs not puroort to show other ir.provenents or encroachr*nt.*t • ' *»» 'i>V2.** -.e »* .c Scale Date o I” = 4C' 9-7-76 Trr:n rarkiir Gordon H. Coffin He . bC64 Lard .f'lrveyor and ?lar-ner Long Lake, Mdroiesota e THIS ITEJ^ HAS BEHfi BliCROFILMED rl?t o'* nvr^o” for Stover. A. flavorbor? in Lot 1, Block 2, Tc%.T.sit3 of Larcdon Park Her.nenin C.cunty, Kinr.^sota Certificate of Sur'/oy: I her'.’^y rerti'*y that this is a tr*:?? -.nri '•orr^ct reoresert.'itio’' of a sui~/’*> of the boMni-.-ries o-"' trot pirt of Lot 1, Plock 2, zr.'i of that cart o’-' •forf-’orn Avo-^:«, row v-acatoc, To--r.3it»» of Lar.-r*or Southeasterly in a stre-ip'^t Ilr.o 2A3.2 feet to a Pcint Park, describe'^ as *'ollo'-s; to—wit: Cormencin- at the o<-'int of Int^’r- sectior. of the Fortherl" line of tho rifiht-of-wny of th** Great forth**rn P-ail ’jay Crtnany with the Southerly ex­ tension o^ the’-'ividin.c line betvoen Lota 1 ar.n 2 ir. saio -loO 2, Tovr.ritc of Lanpdon Park; thence Korth’-osterly alonp the divldlr.f line bet-eer. said and sane extended, q distance of 21,* *1^ feet; thence Kort'-‘“asterlv deflertin.- ripht at an ar.^'le of 82®55' from last described course, a distance of 180 feet to the sctual ocint of beqinninc of the tract of land to be described; th<»nce continuing frcm said actual coint of herinr.inp Mortneasterlv on the extension o'" said last described line, a distance of 60 <*eet; thence ^ V* o line o" said nilrond ripht-of-'-ay, fror the initiol point of co^ roncercnt; thence Southvesterlv alonp said Northerly line 35 feet; thence Northwesterly in a straigr.t line <.Li,i to the actual point of hepinninc; ALSO including all that ?*‘rt of Lot 1 in said Block 2 lying between the Northwesterly line of the „re--'sc': ^-ereinabove described and the shore of Lake Kir^etcnxa, ^ Ind’between the Northerly extension of the KortheasterLy and Soutnwesterly Liae lines of the oranises hereir.above first riescrioed; and the location o. all existing buildings thereon. It does not puroort to show otn.er inproven’sn .s or encroachments. Scale Date o 1" = 4C’ 9-7-76 Iron marker Q^rdcn H. Coffin Lard fur-/eyor and Pl.'i.nr.er Long Lake, Kinnosota .A iMiiTMai •> L # rr ic r - A £4 -'vi o % •- r’^ HARD COVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Set Back Zone: 75'-250' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ITEM LENGIH X WIUIH —. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- ■ - S.F. House 24 X 26 3 62^S.F. Front Deck 12 X 1'^S 2 2 8 S.F. Front Deck Stairs 15 X 3 S 4 0 S. f . Front Cement Slab 7 X 10 70 S.F. Front Waikvav 45 X 3 S 13 5 S.F. Side Waxk P4 X 2 128 S.F. Rear Deck 26 X 5 s 130 S.F. Rear Deck Stairs 12 X 4 s 48 S.F. Back Walkv.*av 53 X 3 159 S.F. Garase ■} •)X 20 s ^ -4 S.F. Walkway 11 X 4 S.F.tm 0 0 *4 *4 S.F. 2'X2* pads Stairs 25 X 3 3T 7 5 S.F. Bsmt Door Landing 4 X 4 16 S.F. Driveway 15 X 19 285 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (A)=24 31 S.F. TOTAL PROPERl’Y AREA IN ZONE (B)=8274 S.F. (A) 2431 / (B)8274 X 100 =29.4% 1 MMnm ■•miw.lfcjr araiM -------------*— r B1 *1^. ft U -i A* * %- /f -y ‘C PROPOSED ADDITION HARDCOVER CaLCLLATIONS ITEM LENGTH \WIDTH JJJJ —- - - - - S.F. House ^ J • • .V 2 b 3 109 2 S.F. Front Deck 10.b X 18 mm !9 ?S.F. Front Cement Slab 7 X 10 70 S.F. Front Waikwav 18 X i S.F.*72 S.F. * 2 X 2 Dads Back Waikvav 53 X 3 159 s pmJ • m • Back Deck Stairs 12 X 0 “48 S.F. Garaj?e 22 X 20 =u ^ ^S.F. Walkway 2’X 2* pads 11 X 4 S.F.44 S.F. Stairs 25 X 3 —7 5 S.F. Bsmt Door Landing / -4 X «4 =lb S.F. Driveway 15 X 19 mm 285 S.F. TOTAL H-\RDCOVER IN ZONE (A)S 2496 S.F. TOT.AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE (B)IS 82 74 S.F. 'A) 2530 (B) 8274 X 100 a 30.2'T, - •' 'v-~rrr » ! ,i \•) »N ^ PROPOSED ADDITION HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS ITEM LENGTH \WIDTH •• - - - - - - - ■ S.F. House 34 X 2o 384 S.F. Ffont Deck 12 X 14 3 1p8 S.F. Deck "Stairs 1 2 X 3 3o S.F. Ent'Tince deck g \10 3 90 S.F. Front Walkwav 4 5 X 3 —1 35 S.F. Back Waikwdv '35 • * A 3 105 S.F. Rear Deck/Ent 2o X 5 1 30 S.F. Rear Deck stairs 12 X 3 3d S.F. Garage ■) •>X 20 S5 f f f *4*4^S.F. Wal kv.av 2'X 2' pads 11 X 4 S.F.S f f •4 **S.F. Stairs 25 X 3 s 7 ^S.F. Bsmt Door Landing *4 X /-♦=1 6 S.F. Drivewav 1 5 X 19 mm 285 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (A)X 2448 S.F. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ( B)3 8274 S.F. (A)244d /(B) 8274 X 100 29.5:: I 1 , 1 ^ i: 1 m \x‘tm r-\‘ A / "/ / —- ---------------------- • ------*??--- \ 1 1 * t / \ / \ \ \\ 6- \ \ \ / / \ \ A \ \ .U J T Vo: 1_LZ1 l.-LZl \ V nn 1—r f-.rz-T POKif etevAW ±>oh\J^ •- V-^” ■- '-o" 1^*..»« <^ •-«—-— VJ*-)•■** X->, r^ '(S y ^ ^\K p.oq? v/e^4V^► (r^ »••-" wrvtj R16I"t-’ipe LeVAfloM ■&iAUE : - I'C'’ etaVATlOKl ■66-M.t .- ' 1'- ■tSfaUU i I 1 I —~- ~i»iiiir 'imtttTmii L 1^ Pioo^ v>" = i'-o' ■‘ ,!' /• i t>» Hr 1 j \ I ••'7U-IJo-O J &A$’&-M6hl'T h/X>9~. R-Af - 1'- '0 . I >1* r fiiftT^rtliiT~~i '■ r^ - n in'T^rt -n~ii^~rri -n rr»4^l—---- ^-■ ■«^sam I s •Z.C* -o 7J ) /------- o / __• -/ BA^^Mbr^T B lcoR P la M 5cAl£ i k‘ = r-o' ^f^; Mote. •• ^HAt?€P WALL^ A^ID # FIE v AJ "THIS 5HC6f. iiifnrT imiMUnyrngm -ti r-rrTmirr-f*iTTTiiiiri<tr<iTff'- •- * ‘ ' r^'^v Cv * • •. NfT> RT •_ • /■' •' I • • gg r • - ^ •i.^ w .^i * .V ■ . Al* ■» » . • 'i» • i • •» *Cy *»•. 1 ^1'; -; ^ » -0^* • • . Jim. .r .i f ^‘Vj 5 } VS?K¥. .|‘. ;1- \ Q - 4 V/HL. n7 Gi to^U. iO' Crt ----------4^ Vi I Vr --4 I > w Jk > V -V 0^^ - - H, f V t • >. ' • * • (O N I lo . I C>4 C u* > li ^ - 'r- t •* lo-O 2-G’‘ C45, t^w CtHTt*. cvt-f- SUPiKlO t5«-A<’J’ POPB. PCIOW Ife'-o'’ S'-O S'-o’ 2.t--o ‘ '/ > • : s. •• • u> •H .• . -* -•««i *y^ . r - i • >v Au i'iXmcM rt^et^vk& ^SSoUicp k fM^tie' Vl'iOT^ I : it . f5o% (S P<oi^ ikf7^ e :^^rf^.T . HAtC> FeAMlNC- 0 MS't^ eCDBiSOM EMD FoP VA\;urtD CElUt4& CACT_i5 ($ 24* cc. vw/car^ ^^A<s.l^te. As «gJ3.p Tao^«-.6.s ?+V.c. e RD^-Ati^^ei cv t£S'M WMUf. ^•44 Jl4o 4^ -SAiHtiLSS ^TO WJkTfcH e>4B.'r) EA ^i6D ilCC y/AU. |Tt5 • I e lyfe 4 1x5 • • . . P-Y'//D W/^jfe^J■ 2<6» ?fjo> tfe»Ov R-l^ ’.fisJUAriOM ->(DI Kl& IKiOlATiai ■ (2. •• *’LeXl'5t»M6. i^'^p- C>tLi3W To F'&MAW :Zyt,e> Tve/'T&P •2.>:\0 TPEATtP FLOfJR Joi^^T \t3"(5.C. W/ d'Olf^T V^A n Jct CRS.. tFeAi&p ttAf'i f Pc^jo (A'i' J2." y^A^" Pl£J? COt4cr<£TP‘ TcoTfrl^-S fv?l IM rAT»Ot4 Kl 0 TF^ : MAT<:i-i EXISTulG, H&T oF |04£e V/Al. 4 46.” FQoor FccJrii^<^^ Al£o. 2o ‘ y S ' Cc4c.. Ff6- lVl6UL- (SUAUD or E-OvJAL 4^0^?^ ^^T\q?\ 0 WA\l ^pPPRoOiA /xicALE' •• Va' = r-o>KW •- A cl Hatecials hJorep ARe ^Tb rvi ‘.rihi/r- Ax, nn^^FiV r*-w- '•> •' ::•*•• v> - ; n \ /-■'j rr * .-st. » • r v'W' August 11, 1993 Jeanne Mabusth Building and Zoning Adninistrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 Dear Jeanne: I am writing in regards to the variance application filed by Mark Prueter. From the start Mark has consulted me on his remodeling plans of which I have had no objections. I feel the new plan is an I am in favor of Mark's home addition. m I Co^ 6' CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE ClTi COU^TII 32 37NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO ' MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2 file #1822 described as follows: ' Refer to Exhibit "A" attached (hereiirfter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the Cit>' for variances to Municipal Zonin- Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of an lS;x26’ m;o siory Addition to rear of the existing structure to be placed 6* from the west side lot line and 7 from the east side lot line where a 10’ setback is required, construction of a ' is’xlO 6’ that will be placed 3’ from the west side lot line where a 10’ setback is required ^d 9‘/i’ in front of an average lakeshore setback line where no such encroachment is allowed The propo"p:ov “mcn. wUl result in a hardcover increase of 65 s.f. or .8% w.th toul h^cove proposed atl496 s.f. or 30.2% where 2.431 s.f. or 29.4 exists and where only ..069 s.f. or 25% is aPowed. NOW’, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVTD by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota: FUNDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1822. The property is located in the LR-lC, Lakeshore Residential Zomng Distnct requiring acre in area and a minimom width of 100’. The property consists of 12,17^4 s.f. in area. Lot width measures 55 ’ in a straight line at the shoreline and at the 75 ’ setback line. Page 1 of 7 OMI L_ 1 CITY of ORONO # RESOLLTION OF THE Cm' COUNCIL Q O C* l,t» O ^ V >»NO. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 17, 1993, and recommended approval of ±e variances as propored based on the followmg fmdings and hardships: A. Lot narrows at the midpoint of the property measuring 55 at the lakcshore and 35’ to the rear. B.The applicant proposes a reduction of hardcover within the 0*75 setback area at 1.7%. C.Emergency access can be achieved via 10+ foot corridor berween adjacent residences to the cast and west. Prime access to site will be from the south from the municipal hydrant. Total structural coverage is proposed at 1,724 s.f. or 14.1% where 15% would be allowed. E.Proposed lakeside replacement deck will reduce the encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line by 2'A*. The e.xisting deck is 15’ in width. The proposed deck will be lOVs* in width. F. G. The home was constructed prior to existing zorang requirements. No additional land is available to allow for expansion without the need of variances. H. The property has steep slopes to south creating unique drainage problems. The City Council fmds that the conditions e.xisting on this property are peculiar to it and do net apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions. light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial proper^ right of the applicant, and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 7 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE Cm' COUNCIL 2 ^ 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City statf, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions I (B) and 2 and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of an 18’x26* two story addition to the rear of the existing residence and construction of a replacement deck of 18’xl0’6" to the lakeside of the existing residence subject to the final improvement plan for the property as shown on page 6 of the resolution and upon approving this variance the City grants a 4 or 40% west side setback variance, a 3’ or 30% east side setback variance, a 7’ or 70% west side setback variance fc • replacement deck, a 9*6" setback encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line and a hardcover variance for a net increase of 65 s.f. or .08% with total hardcover now at 2,496 s.f. or 30.2%, subject to the following conditions: 1.All existing improvements scheduled for removal shall be completed prior to the final inspection for the new addition. Applicant shall maintain hardcover at 2,431 s.f. or 29.4% by removing 65 s.f. of wood walkway in rear yard. Applicant shall provide a grading and drainage plan that addresses maintenance of positive drainage from foundation of new audition. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building pe’^mit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 14, 1994). Viola': m of or non-compliance with any of tlie terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate anv authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 7 .if/ JAW k.'.tn .. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITi' COLTNCIL (} r? ry NO. O ^ -» 5.The undeni.gned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees :o the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of June, 1993. ATTEST; <1—< ^DOTothy Mrtfallin, City ^;;r^ ^ 0' Edward J. Callahan, Jr.. Mayqr^ Propert>- Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument w’as acknowledged before me on this 14th day of June, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was e.xecuted on behalf of the City. JAMIE L BOSMA notary PUBUOMINNC HBM81N COUNTY ] MyComBiEi5UOl2-1M7 Notafy/Public Page 4 of 7 fwrnmm^rnm r CITY of ORONO %. f RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL p. O p, ‘V^NO. EXHIBIT "A * Lot 1, Block 2, Townsite of Langdon Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota: That part of Lot I, Block 2, 'and of that part of Ncrtliern Avenue, now v.acatcd, Townsite of Langdon Park, described as follows: to-wit: Commencing at the point of intersection of the Northerly line of the right-of-way of the Great Nonhem Railway Company with the Southerly extension of the dividing line between Lots 1 and 2 in said Block 2, Townsite of Langdon Park, thence Northwesterly along the dividing line between said Lots 1 and 2 and same extended, a distance of 213.14 feet; thence Northeasterly deflecting right at an angle of 82055’ from last described course, a distance of 180 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence continuing from said actual point of beginning Northeasterly on the extension of said last described line, a distance of 60 feet; thence Southeasterly in a straight line 263.2 feet to a point in the line of said right-of-way of die Great Northern Railway Company, which point is 140 feet Northeasterly, measured along the Northerly line of said railroad right- of-way, from the initial point of commencement; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly right-of-way line 35 feet; thence Northwesterly in a straight line 247.7 feet to the actual point of beginning; ALSO including all that part of Lot 1 in said Block 2 lying between the Northwesterly line of the premises hereinabove described and the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and between the Northerly extension of the Northeasterly and Southwesterly side lines of the premises hereinabove first described. Page 5 of 7 J.. //Z l '^O IW fl .7 JJL r:rr . i' '*• — .•/ • *: H Ki ■> .t? THIS ITEM HAS BEF.fi #.'■'1) Pl-it' oT r.urvc;* for Stover. A. Havorbor? ^ , in Lot L, Block 2, Tovr.sito of Lm^don .-.>r< nor.nfioi,n Cnnnty^ I'inrseso—J \ ‘ii” Certificate of Cur/cy: I hereby rertify that y this is a tr;o >r.rf '-orroct ; ^ rsprespnt-‘i^inn of n cur**‘^2^ of tho bcMH^'iv.rioj ti'nt r^rt of Lot 1, nioc!< .?, or.d o:that cart of NortV.rn .V'or.i;';, row vara tori, Tounaite of L-ar.-don Park, riesrriteri as ^ollo'-s; to-'-»i Cormencinr at the ?.>lnt of Inter­ section of the Hortherly rirht-of-w.ny of the Great h'ort..e^ Pjil'-nv Crnrany vith the Southerly ex­ tension of the rilvlrilnr line tetvoen^^ Lota L ar.ri C in saio PLorr 2, .o'-r.c.p LanRdon Park; thence Korthvcstorly ^ the dlvldlnj line b^tveen s»W -„j extended, a distance of 21, .14 .eet, \ Vort''*asterly deflertlnr ri.iht at an arg.e \ r 82®55' frora Last desrribod courae, a distance \ %n r.lt to the actual oclnt of beginninc of the tract r land to be described; thonce continuing free, sal of land to be desc.^c , j,^^faeasterlv cn the e.xtension actual noint or ' rHttance of 60 feet; thence of said last desert e_ j„„ 263 7 feet to a point In the Southeasterly in a Cre-it northern Rail'-uy Coapany, r;: iri'^^'^t 'cr^he^tfrly, r^nsured along the Hcrthe^y vhich coin- is . j- .Ug initial point of con­ iine of sold V, alonf said f.'ortherly rleht-of-v-ay ccncercnt; thonce 2o^t^”t-r . ^ ^„^t line 247.7 feet line 35 feet; thence to the actual ^int the -orthuesterly Une of the Lot 1 in said Ploc.£ V v „h «r.d th- shore of Lake Kinnotonka, prerdsos hereinabove e^cr-- . ‘‘ - ^ yortheasterlT' and Southwesterly sice ;„d bof.-een the hortherl:,- and the location of all iS'auf. ^i'u?r;S=tL^;eo"n^-?t-oo"“no-t^P^c.-nt lo aboo other Inprovenenta or encroachner.t.s. Scale: Jate : 1" = 40' 9-2-76 Iron marker Gordon H. Coffin He Land S'ir-.*eyor and Planner I in.v Lake, Kinnesota !r. 6064 Page 6 of 7 jlgangL Sch.1,ilh & Ctrtifieil ftiHic finountmt / * / CLpjiti^AJtxi^ /is0 September 16, 1993 Hi!? limleudrd, Suitt ISO iHimrcjjifflis^ ^mncsofa 5580:j (fiI2) MM750 ____^^0;i2) 593-1721 City of orono P»0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, m 53323 PotNf* brand fax tpntmittai memo 7671 «c 'ph **» / Dee,v Sic or Madam: ««. Pcuetar, Permit AppUcti NaT.ber 1050 ^ c«ciion Its ana a^^l'!^an‘t ^ “‘'a'' the city c«cenUy“i“eStbr an needa to ^nd other added water onto my nroJ®!„ to create 9rading are minimum answers^'o thlTi.^e,^"'*'' regulations the^^o^S i^^ current city restrict me rron'^adS^nra front half Of „y house^ sin^f^ ® structures are existing f^ree with a pro-jfct'^th?t^in f 5 ^Ing to my existing ho^seJ ^ ^-ited^''a?1^'1r^'’’f\t r With hardcover Srw^n\^rc.^ply “ltJ"|,“‘‘«i!^ itself that the proposed p™ imT“ “ ^^'rrT.rnoto^!^TiA ?5s. <■?. ‘•1.^ —V Ma.iAfMi iineVaAta TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE September 16, 1993 SUBJECT: #1857 James Stinson, 2623 Casco Point Road • Variances - Public Hearing Applicant proposes a 12’xl8* addition to lakeside of residence and the reinstallation of a 12’x21 ’ deck adjacent to addition. The acmal addition will extend 1 1 1/2’ beyond the existing residence as applicant proposes the removal of the existing wall with the installation of the lakeside addition. The proposed improvements involve increases m hardcover where there are already excesses of hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area. There will be an 11 1/2’ encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line by the proposed addition. The structure will be improved within a substandard side setback at 7.5’. The new construction will require a side setback variance. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback, review Exhibit F. Allowed = 0 Proposed = 11 1/2’ Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover review within the 75-250’ setback = 7,680 s.f. Allowed = 1,920 s.f. or 25% Existing = 3,907 s.f. or 50.87% Proposed = 3,965.5 s.f. or 51.6% Variance = 2,045.5 s.f. or 26.6% Increase of hardcover = 58.5 s.f. or .7% Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side yard setback variance Required = 10 ’ Existing = 7.5’ Proposed = 7.5’ Variance = 2.5’ or 25% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicants Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Ov/ners List E - Hardcover Fact Sheet F - Surx ey G - Elevation of Lakeside H - Floor Plan I - Staff Sketch .-i. nr -11 £. r: WiPltotfh ly’.flp:.rJir MViiiiiL-. .--i. Zoning File #1857 September 16, 1993 Page 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes removal of the existing upper level lakeside deck installed over concrete patio and replacement with upper level !2’xl8 ’ addition and 12'x2r connecting deck. The lakeside wall adjacent to addition will be removed and the upper level expanded with new windows installed at lakeside of addition. Principal structure addition w ill be installed at a 1'5 ” setback The addition will encroach the average lakeshore setback determined by the principal structures on adjacent properties by 11 1/2’. Hardcover within the 75-250 ’ setback area is increa.sed from 50.87% to 51.6%. Applicant has proposed no hardcover removals. Applicant has advised that the extension will go beyond the existing 10 ’ deck in order to miss the concrete patio below. Footings will be instaUed within landscape area underlain with geotechnic fabric, review Exhibit I. Statement of Hardship Applicant has not provided a statement of hardship. The hardships are obvious. The lot is severely limited in area and applicant is unable to acquire additional lands to offset hardcover excesses. The residence was constructed in 1965 and there is no record of a side setback variance review. The garage constructed in 1967 received setback variances. The shared driveway and parking area is needed to provide safe access onto Casco Point Road from side door facing garages. Issues for Consideration 1.As staff has already noted, a section of landscape area underlain with geotechnic fabric was noted at the time of the site inspection. As applicant has not shewn landscape areas underlain with plastic within the hardcover information, .staff must recommend that all hardcover areas underlain with either plastic or geotechnic fabric not recorded within the hardcover facts must be removed prior to the issuance of a building pennit for the new consmiction. Hardcover approved for this property must remain at the levels approved with this current variance application. The expansion of the new addition will be landscape area and is recorded in proposed hardcover at an increase of 58.5 s.t. or .7%. Review Exliibiis E and F, what existing hardcover improvements can be considered for removal? The improvements appear very basic. Should proposed improvements be reduced in area? Should new addition to principal structure be moved 2.5’ further east in order to meet 10 ’ side setback? Zoning File #1857 September 16, 1993 Page 3 Any recommendation of approval must include a disclaimer concerning landscape areas underlain with plastic or geotechnic fabric and that the removal of these fabrics must be completed prior to applicant applying for building permit for new construction. ^ I • I L ■‘ •rrrr.- •• n»w i -TT-' wu ■ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATld^ -i >w ' ^-r r ;r“* / ' •■'-?• .• ^ ■'. " ■% • ^ V /■ V -y W'l H/ Initial Application Fee $175.t)0 ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) " • A .7 K)• t t. * •. f -• _ « u -t M Vv^ . V»Va property information site Address ^ I ^ Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.)^^ Attach legal description to application if not included (.onth/year) Present use of property Zoning niai^rict; O/ applicant Phone (hning) I rName o r- ■L '=TV.cVwo »‘>.SNr» — Phone (worlc) '*T V C- / z—L City=to Phone (home)_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __— Address OWNER (if different than applicant) Name 5 ^ /7t-i Phone (worlc) Address:City:Zip: description of request Estimated Construction Cost $. rr^ikA \-A_- Describe request in detail ^ . C_o^^r\ c P ^ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ Lot Area _ _ Lot Width ^ Hardcover - -Lot Coverage Setbaclc: _ _ Front Side Rear Average Lalceshore Other (specify) hardship/description of UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS r riif€icultv and unusual propertyDescribe undue hardship or practical ^ reauirements: _ _ _ conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Co q , - ■•If... . <' rTi . (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 17Completed Application Form 2. V Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center . / 348-3271). >^3. V^Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). V Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 855”xll" for reproduction). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes / in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8W"xll"). 6. V / Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*s ”xll"). T.aiFAs an addenduin to this application, please attach a separate list of / any other persons you wish notified of this application. S.V Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variamce application is not complete if the above informat aj:.is not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time net covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's SignaturHCI>c^^>^r>^~fi3 Date Y 1^6 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Siqnatur^T ~'^><.<it _____ Date P ^ ^ ^ Applicant must Jtave all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on t e third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If applicant s unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zon ng Office of this change prior to the meeting. -T ^***- - U/(7s C5< OAJL ^ut /YLiti^ L^A.^j d AjTCri^ ^ A /jd. / th Odr- i::^^ ■O ,!l <=3 7^^ (-<^<UL^ k-'-C i.(/Hc^d^ 4'i^A i M- - -2 K ^ »^P***- - *-*f « '^ • _ ■ ^^.-~r-~^ .1 wTT. - * “T^ JO, .0 &•, < i- RUN DAT! 06/27/93 BATCH 001 HEH4CPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INfORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Olt4ERS M5T REPORT NO. P195S901 PAGE I PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 38 20-117-25 21 0052 02585 DUrSIOODY AVE ERNEST C BLANCHARD ETAL ERNEST C BLANCHARD 2565 DUTAIOODY AVE HAYZATA m 55591 f )PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 20-117-25 2-^ 0051 02655 CASCO POINT RD MARILYN B THORNE ET AL MARILYN D THORNE 2655 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55591 PROP ADOR ' ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-25 24 0056 02601 CASCO POINT RD BRUCE J HEOBLOM ET AL BRUCE J HEOBLOM AND CAROL J CLINE-HEOBLOM 2601 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55591 t \ PROP ADOR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 20-117-25 24 0042 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIG!4ED PAUL J 1 MARY E KA5TER PAUL J RASTER 2600 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55591 M7 » J r 1 I ^ y • I• / <rr- 38 20-117-25 24 0029 02649 CASCO POINT RO J A J SCHERVEN JON SCHERVEN 2649 CASCO POINT kO BOX 120 NAVARRE MN 55592 33 20-117-23 24 0050 02645 CASCO POINT RO N J GREENE AAR GREENE NORMA GREENE S ALAN GREENE 2b45 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA rtl 55391 30 20-117-23 24 0032 02623 CASCO POINT RO JAN STINSON JAMES L A NAOMI L STINSON 2625 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA Itl 55591 58 20-117-25 24 0055 02617 CASCO POINT RO G L MARQUAROr/J M MAROUAROT GARY L A JOAN M MARQUAROT 2617 CASCO POINT RO ITAYZATa MN 55591 36 20-117-25 24 0050 02618 CASCO POINT RO JOYCE A TUEOT JOYCE A THEOT 2618 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 551^1 38 20-117-23 24 0059 02648 CASCO POINT RD J H A B J ESSEN JEFFREY A BAKDARA ESSEN 2648 CASCO PT RO HAYZATA MN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 001 00010 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE Ot4 THE RECORDS CF OF ’HE MY HEItlEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATIOfi, KriONLEDGE AND BELIEF. " fs OAT •Vt-Vt- O• ‘Ji-• 3( . V © ^ - ■ i- i' t- f. <;■ >• t'l f .. V r k usa X -T' -^'V :r^ T ft 7 \ •’■•■ •i*.' 'tr-^ -7^ HARDCOVER CALCJUUIQM WORKS^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE CNE) 0-75 250-500' 500-IC00' Existing H arbcover in Zone »t c -___ X .■5.0 -1^0 _s.F.® • • o/ 1 LENGTH 52 ___ X . WIDTH OD-HSH _ S.r. , X __ S.F. m ___ X .■Mas • __ S.F. X >HwaM _ S.F. -7 ?X MBHa (/? 6 0 __ S.F.C^ O • (jARAGc To f \/C’jJ AV ^ 0 X _u X. WM ■ 10-0 0 _ s.r.^ C •UKlVtnAT ^ X . mm _ S.F. D. ! • * ^ 0^9 T A t X . X . SI^ a 3 , is 3 ^X It 3 ss C3> - S.F.(g) E.Patio/ 3ec:<X _JO 3 '3>9o _ s.f.^2^ F.Landscape ____X .S _ S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other S.F. Total H ardcover in Zone 3^t%'? _ S.F. Total Property Area in Zone _ '1630 5^/Q7 ^-r S.F.B St>,87 H . X 100 % Mm d I r T-Wt>j arSitf'. > m i'B* ■ Ik ................ ■Mil lilliiailMil t IlM I M - ft HARDCOVER CALCUU^TIONW^RKSHEET SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH WIDTH E. Patio/ )eck _ X _ X Total Property Area in Zone - - - - HS'DV X 100 =O B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 1 AKin^rAPP Y 8S S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN R Y Y =r S.F. PLASTIC • SHEETING V S.F. Y S.F. D thpp 'X S.F. • Total Hardcover IN Zone S.F. S.F. O % ! - »fr A*£ —V WILLIAM D. SCHOELL juairrcuco civil enqinicm SCHOELL & MADSON, INC S/47 77/0 CARLISLE MADSON iicaitTiACO land tuKViYOJl mimm. no. ■••• •o. 0A« y Wl*. NO. « rLOAlSA NO. MO. OA«. mont. no. ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS • O NINTH AVINUC SOUTH HOPKINS. MINNfSCTA PHONE; iOi 7t!4 MIMN. no. 4»Y4 • O. 0*A. 7*1 NIB. NO. ••§74 IOWA NO. >70a NO. OAA. 1 toa CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY MONT. NO. 174i a V Shee^ /of 2 JlL^.1 —T V-l /-Cti/':*.:* •/> <>. ' i .M •'(2 f*’ /^'" ^J s/i .r>'/fx-. ■*•».' f 1 /■ i'. . —• • • —* • » I < * ..i ;i |i !l C.:v / 9- yf !> ;i ✓ 1^ C^V'"»» y>'J f- '-' I.- % • y.// I •• • «• » I f . v:3 .' c. -U .1____ V r *"A /"»'y y^**t.'*i ■■ V- • ^ * y ^ - • ' » .^ .: •• f W.C .# ..« /t ,• r • J*,* *<^ - » * • • / r /, V"*- r-'i') V -i. ' /? , <i^ . ••« / ) • •‘t *7 • «r; *J » » / « •.V *>• */." K I^ .<* •/uV«-*<’ -,v-.f •-.JCV .’o'*-’ -/. .• •Jj < . ’ <f iV ’ •• • -y^/- t‘/ • > .'/> •* .' '"C^ :* >»i /.^ , •.5'fvV •» f / ; • * '» —aU - .^7v/T //.r'*A'> rt'} /C <->.C ^ /v<-y >/•’. V*. .C'/(IS/v'.f t % ^ - • ; v ;:- / *- • * > X~ PoiT:5 ^ ,-CfX' Zi :j -. ''i**’ " ■»//0 ■■ ) r X /:i i u./ /.irrA: I ''a ^ ' V.•. f I i Y yu\„ i It WIU-IAM O. SCHOEUL HKairrcMC'^ civil tHaiNitn NO. •o. OAK y SCHOELL &. MADSON, ENGINEERS A SURVEYORS INC. fLOHiOA MO. 0l7f HO. OAK. ••• MOMT. no. 1010-S BO NINTH AVBNUB fOUTM HOMKINB. MINNCfOTA MHONf: B3B-7BIA CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY ^/■^7 .'77./0 ■ CARLISLE MADSON UtaitTlOlO LAND •UMVtYOH f»0. «>74 • O. OAK. '«t1 WI0. NO. • •74 IOWA MO. 370« MO. OAK. I tO« MOmT. MO. 1741.• FOR A^Tj^/ujs Scot-'t iFll/S MOJ^ TO A oe 1 oA/O • n & m - 4* J -4 ^ --W . J . . . • V"" /I'*’ «^ > . v; ^ ^ . y\KA-' C'^J/mncy m t{A ■4r Shee/" /of 2 ;! L TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:September 10, 1993 SUBJECT: l^fl858 John and Marla Mcridcih, 3685 Watertown Road - Variances Public Hearing The applicant proposes the installation of a 4,800 s.f. indoor riding arena requiring variances to the allowed size for an oversized accessory structure on a property that exceeds 9 acres in area. The addition of 4.800 s.f. of accessory structure would also exceed the allowance for the total area of accessory structures on the residential prv>peny. A major concern with this review is that an on-site septic system has never been locates on the property. Based on the location of the tanks the drainfield is located somewhere to the south. Staff is concerned that the proposed location for the oversized accessory may be located within existing drainfield. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: Section 12.30, Subdivision 6 - Systems operation, use and maintenance. Owners’ responsibility. As already noted above, the on-site septic system nas never been located on this property . With the installation of a 4,800 s.f. facility within the rear yard, it is necessary to locate the septic system before any other iniprovements are allow'ed within the rear yard. The code clearly states that it is the owners' responsibility to provide that information. The on-site septic manager is in contact with the owners to offer assistance to their on-site septic evaluator when conducting the field inspection. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C-2) A.Maximum individual accessory structure/footprint area fer pioperties in excess of 9.01 acres. Allowed = 3,000 s.f. I’roposed = 4,800 s.f. Variance = 1,800 s.f. or 60% B.Allowed total area of all accessory structure footpr'nt areas on a property in excess of 9.01 + acres. Allowed = 6,000 s.f. Proposed = 8,288 s.f. Variance = 2,288 s.f. or 38% 1 jrtiwii Zoning File #1858 September 10, 1993 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicants Addendum C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Septic Map F - Weekman Memo G - Survey H - Section/Floor - Spacing Plan I - Front Elevations J - Covenant for Oversized Accessoiy- Structures Description of Request The 60’x80' indoor riding arena (pole bam) shall be installed to the south of the other accessory stmetures. As required by code, the oversized accessory structure shall assume the setbacks of a principal structure and will well exceed the 100’ rear and 50’ side setback (review Exhibit G). Based on the information received with the wall section, it would appear the maximum height to the high point of the gable roof will be 24 ’ and will meet the 30’ allowed height and will not exceed the height of the two story principal strucnire. Sloping topographies of the south yard also help to minimize impact of the height in relation to the surrounding residential unit properties. The oversized accessory structure will exceed the allowed footprint area and with the installation of the riding arena the property will now exceed the allowed area tor total accessory structures on the 10-acre parcel. Refer to Section 10.03. Subdivision 9 (C-3), the accessory structure ordinance requires the owners to execute a covenant to be filed on the chain of title of the property whereby the ow'ners agree to maintain property at its current area to supp(ui the oversized accessory stmeture. If this property were to be subdivided in the future, it shall be the owners ’ responsibility to remove said structure. The other oversized accessory structure on the property, 36’x48 ’ horse stable, was installed prior to the oversized accessory stmeture ordinance and there is no covenant governing the stmeture. Review Exhibit J, a sample of the covenant developed by City and used when oversized accessor)' stmetures are constmeted on a property . P.^. I~ ' I I ^Hii ■ irfc >1 ■ T I WP*" I ■ Hi <r li I rA'*'. I ^1 I ^ f I Zoning File #1858 September 10, 1993 Pase 3 Please review Exhibit F, Weckman's memo, as already noted above, the City has never received any confirmation as to approximate location of drainfield. Septic tanks have been located to the south. Refer to Exhibits E and F, it is recommended that prior to construction of the new facility that the septic system be located so that appropriate protection can be taken before construction vehicles are allowed in the southern yard and to ensure that location of proposed building is not within the drainfield area. Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibit A, applicants note difficulty of pre.senting hardships based on code standards. The new accessory structure ordinance would now prohibit indoor riding arenas in excess of 3,000 s.f. There are several indoor riding arenas within the City which were installed prior to the current code. Structures of this type are a part of many of the horse operations along Watertown Road within the 5-acre zoning district. The covenant to be filed in the chain of title will protect the City’s interest if propeny was to be considered for subdivision in the future. The structure would have to be removed or applicants or future owners would have to seek permission of the City if structure w'as to remain (variance application). Issues for Consideration 1.What will the exterior color of the accessory structure be? Will it be of the same beige color of the existing accessory structures in the south yard? 2.Would special landscaping or plantings assist in minimizing impact ot oversized accessory structure? 3.Can structure be reduced in area? This structure shall be used by owners and will not be used as part of a typical boarding operation. 4. Other issues rai.scd bv Planning Commission. nM mMl'ii* *W'r' , wv .y - ^ <•h S? I"') CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) . - Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original app)lication) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION s 'i ^<T (1)ATFierr^tj k) . Ouo . IVI uy.site Addres _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Property Identif. Number (P. I.D.) ^~ \ \ ^ ' II Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.,i a.Date PropertY^Acquired (mcnth/year) I (do) (dii-jaot-)" also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) W ~7 ^ ^ 01^ L- Q-H ^ (1/ Pv L l\y' I PF"l7-\ Phone (wor)c) Q 1*^' Address:^^ Qii:City; i _ _ _ Ziv: o APPLICANT Name ^ OWNER (if different than applicant) ( Same ) Phone (home) Name Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ .cHrO Describe request in detail: C;0 P,^Al'3-iO i^COiic ru^io/^r Aiz^OfV- - - - - - --- - - - --- - - - - - - - - VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ Lot Area Setback: Lot Width Front Side Hardcover \/Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property ^ conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code ^quirementsbiAujfL'OfJE - r UhiO-rei^-S AOO fRF(5Le<^ ClA/kJF’^u , T2.|D,I0|--, oot g I>V1P0SS|&(F \ AMP me' oos clmP€~t(~tlrzs / M—^ J * (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be siibmitited by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered comp 1 ete: 1. _^/completed Application Form 2. ___vCertified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. v4 >lat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _^Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%’'xll ” for Kc reproduction). 5^cjL**^opographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8is"xll"). 6. _^S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. — As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items t'S may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature J c^iTy - w ' nl\ Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verificationx>f this request. Owner's Signature ixxt tnis requ )4 Date ^ Applicant must have^^4 submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission auid Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. . I #1 {-Q 4?«;r > .f '"5 August 26.199^ 3685 Watertown Road Orono. Mn. 55359 Mrs. Jeanne Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re; Variance Application Dear Mrs. Mabusth: 1 am writing to request that our application for a variance be expedited. As you are aware, we have been planning this project for quite some time and taking steps toward its completion. After discussing this project with you in May we thought we could proceed without needing a variance. Unfortunately, I failed to clearly convey that this would be a covered riding arena. It was only after applying for our building pennit that we learned that we needed a variance and there would be a significant delay. Now that our plans have been finalized and we are on the verge of breaking ground, we are anxious to complete this project before the winter sets in. As I mentioned on the application form, we are serious competitors in horse shows. Because of the extreme htizard ot riding on ice and snow, both to hor.se and rider, and to extend our riding season, we stroniilv desire to build a covered ridins arena. Wc Wi)uld very much appreciate it if you coukl put our application on the earliest agenda for both the Planning Commission and the City Council Meeting. I believe that our application is complete, if there is something missing, please let me know. 'Fhank you very much. Sincerely, n Marla Meridcth RUN DATE 06/25/956ATCH 010RROR AOORONNER NAf€ TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR I PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP K ONNER K;iHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR ONICR NAHE TiUCPAYER NAW/ADDR r t 58 05-117-25 12 0009000^0 STUBBS BAY RO S NELDON H DUNN ETAL HEIDON H DUNN AO STUBBS BAY RD HAPLE PLAIN m 55359 56 52-116-25 5A OOOA 00065 STUBBS DAY RO N R A A KROEGER RICHARD G RROECER AS N STUBBS BAY RO HAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 56 52-116-25 5A 0011 05665 NATERT0I4N RD J H t H L HERIOETH JOHN H A MARLA HERIOETH 5665 HATERTOHN RO HAPLE PLAIN m 55559 56 52-116-25 65 0006 05565 NATERTOIt^ RD NELDON H DUNN KELDON H DUNN 60 STUBBS BAY ROAD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 HOfflEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSUM rROPLRTY OIRIERS LIST RtPORT no. Pl455«i01 PAGE38 05-117-J3 21 000203750 BAYflDE RO JOHN BURGER ETAL JOHN BURGER 3750 BAVGIOE RO LONG LAKE tt4 5535b 38 32-118-23 31 000503760 HATERTOItl RO CATHARItJE A CRAM CATHARItff A CRAM 37bO tIATERTCniN RO (UPLE PLAIN tnj 55359 38 32-118-23 34 0005 00025 STUBBS BAY RO t R GRINLEY < K TUKUA OErnilS M KRUMP 25 NO STUBBS BAY RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 38 32-118-23 34 0004 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO JO»IN F OWW JOHN F ouiai 20 S BROUN RD P 0 BOX 77 LONG LAKE MM 55354 58 32-118-23 34 0012 03743 HATERTOItl RO NEO L BUTTERFIELD NED L BUTTERFIELD 3745 HATERTOItl RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 58 32-118-23 34 0014 00075 STUPOS BAY RD N G 0 t K A HOLFF GERALD t KATHLEEN HOLFF 75 STUBBS BAY RO N MAPLE PLAIN IW 55359 rg->tgilh TOTAL BATCH 010 00010 1 CE ..1FY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEfttlEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE DEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE '’Wi . n n • • #I* •I ..%•. ^ .• «. * V V *^ - W^• - 1 ir,-I I ^• » 44^•4 ••«;•?' I i tU. ;r .V.^9 .»•;• ‘JV.V-• -.p .‘v: ■ ;I . ■ *1 • . i ^ f ^' ' •; I' :.i '■?■■■ •;; \v '..V « • !•: i‘v ‘ 'c •• V ' .•%V.4* •■• ... ■, '% /■Ti*r . \r, ?■ ... !^Mv•-;<^. V;rl-..t::, :v.^;.;:.l A. ^ ' i ■■ ;.•-j .’-\ • UlINSPECTION HECORD • !I * * .. / * : . . *1 V . ^ I •.' f DATE COMPUANCE//•/p,''p)2 A)o AJfTa-t^ "P-____ ‘/-■i V'. " “ 1. V Pt ■;••'.“• •: • ♦ f • •* *.v*»v ,».v\ • * • i 1vA ■ • ' ** •' . « « -V , « . *1 :\:i •*•; l’;V. 1 • r -vj •I : j . . V •• •v-•• '!*<;* • 2- *' 5 'uT - .-‘-Ji.*- t. '/ih^pxki: 'g.r^ihci -a . r ‘ ■rV'^b'v'J V : . •! t • r^: »V I i. -Vi * ‘ « V I. ./•'] V ; I r *.' • V •• »• *. • ’ i .4 ‘ Si .'•• • •■• • ia • ’.y,./ A-' •• •' .'* V'.,- ! :,V V • • ' i > t'r. • • i -•' , ' I ■ >•. * ‘ • A «*» ■» • •• , • >**•< • 'i ■ ‘ y .. '.i ■ -Vm-. % ■/ A ' V. C - CONFORMING S SUBSTANDARD N - NONCONFORMING * •. • j ma-mmairn AtM M ■ « K.' 7-10 1/r 15-10 y/T 2y-io i/r 3v~io yr _3r-io V^’ 47-10 i/r ss -io i/r•-TO t72*r=o’r-cr*r=(T"r=o’r-o*R^cr “63-10 1/r . 7V-10 1/r* 7S-10 1/2" ^— ----------r-o'2wI frr — 3 -r3 1 I r 12'xl2 ’ SLIDER DOOR NOTES: BUILDING IS 60'x80*x1ft ’ 24 ” OVERHANG ON 2 SIDES Sc 1 END 24" EAVE LITE ON BOTH SIDES EXISTING BUILDING - D !rr 1 I t I - 3 12 ’xl2 ’ SLIDER DOOR - 3 - 3 s o \ FLOOR POLE SPACING PLAN SCALE: 3/16" - V 77.7VVV(j I '’vL- '■•V ,T*T ”p7 v^'*5iSK^vT^,;lv»V ty TRUSS LOADING 6c DESIGN TO SPEC SHEET .^>'.1 .<.^1 1. .I k-.i* ^ ^w-i. p A A.' ^ _ A- CITY OF ORONO COVENANT OVERSIZED ACCESSORY STRDCTORE THIS COVENANT, made and entered into this 19 , by day of (sing 2^g/husband and wife/a Minnesota corporation), (hereinafter referred to as -Applicants") and the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the City ). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Applicants have made application to the City for an accessory structure on property in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, legally described as: (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, City staff have reviewed Applicants application and have found that the structure requested is defined within Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) of the Orono Municipal Code as an Oversized Accessory Structure { OAS ); and WHEREAS, Applicants are aware that according to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C)(3)(c), specific conditions exist for an allowable OAS; and WHEREAS, Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C)(3)(c) allows issuance of a permit for construction of the subject OAS conditioned upon the execution of this Covenant and its filing in Applicant's chain of title; and WHEREAS, in order to identify all parties within an interest in the subject property, the Applicants are required to provide title information to City staff as requested. ■? . parties with an interest in this property shall sign this covenant . Page 1 of 4 ■3 rr- - n ■■1 am~i i*fifi NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO THIS COVENANT AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING; 1. Applicants' request for one (1) Oversized Accessory Structure ("OAS") on the Subject Property is approved conditioned upon the execution of this Covenant by the City and the Applicants. 2. The following conditions shall control the existence of the OAS: A) No future subdivision of the Subject Property will be approved that places the OAS within a lot that has no principal structure. B) Should Applicants wish to subdivide the Subject Property, the OAS may remain without a principal structure for a period to be determined by the Orono City Council. If no principal structure is fully constructed and completed on the property by the end of the determined period, the OAS must be removed. C) Should Applicants subdivide the Subject Property, the OAS and the principal structure shall be located within the same lot, which meets the minimum lot area requirement based upon the size of the accessory building, which lot area requi’^ement is detailed in Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C)(2) of the Orono Municipal Code. SetbacJc requirements as defined in Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C)(a) shall also apply. 3. This Covenant shall be binding upon current and future owners of Subject Property, and shall be filed within the chain of title of the Subject Property. 4. Fee owner(s) of the Subject Property, if not the Applicants, concent to the execution of this Covenant and to its terms, as shown by his/her/their signature(s) upon this document. Page 2 of 4 mm r CITY OP ORONO; By: Its Mayor By: Its City Clerk ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) this The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me day of • and and _____________, the __ of the City of Orono on behalf of the muncipal corporation. Notary Public My Commission Expires APPLICANT(S): By: By: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (APPLICANTS) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) this Th^ foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me day of . 19 , by and (husband ” and wife/single/a Minnesota Corporation) as their free act and deed/on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 3 of 4 FEE OWNER(S) By;___________ By: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (FEE OWNERS) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) this The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me day of _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—^ ana (husband and wife/single/a Minnesota Corporation) as their free act and deed/on behalf of the corporation. Certificate f l^CCdCfeh __________ 926.ce •» ;»p 0^ * t O-tA 4 6 2 . 09 *> rn ” r r».’ /' «r 70 1,-h^l *.//A a>r<hracjaf- ‘f-n-% ^phc. Xns^iJbC 2 r* c ' .**-^J— A;. f/ /»o<*o "’f' j *'iv Y puOQny.o'tv.462.95 6 76.71 .... . *-• S /«»»r of Mir 5C f/4 .'►f *hr •? 1/4 cf 5ec. 32, T. HO, R. 2 3 320 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD 473-4687 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 SJto .-4jU-/^^^Trrx -t-ZT' ^rxJLu. z: c3c£o^ ^ '■^- 7^ ““ -r.' . - <5^cr>n-^^„^<jtJC~ .<jrrry^‘c^cyv^ <XA-^Lrr\ z»€^x-v-'^ C2/y^LcJ^ sjL yu.c>CiJ\ >>' > •V-'JOhjUL^ .yinojuJ c ^jO '^CjG-t4-^y\Zj^Lju /Ci/OO-tO.^J^.oJK cay ^<3^ CjXtZ^X- Ct-2^ • # s.yr'i£^c>^ •jZj^\jZ^Ay-r'\_^ Cc w^Z/-y>-Lg» ^ G~1/-^Jk^ ^-^^t</t/COi.^^O-7' '^<JU^ -«VTi2>OTn_>' C< ^,<^C<-<5^ w-ZZ/-x>-U£ ''^^roLydC. JCA jl^ wZ^-^oexr^Z^/Q^ wO^ t-O'ZA'S— 6l<=^ <¥T ^ofm 3-jrger. Tsfure 1475 ‘Terrjcti'vwLn ^ ’Pfyncn^. MS.55447 September 15, 1993 MEMO TO: C«ty of Orono Planning Commission and City Council and to all others who may be concerned SUBJECT: Horse riding ring Please know that the plans of John and Marla Merif’cth, of 3685 Watertown Road, to build a horse riding and training ring in their pasture north of my property next to Bederwood Park on the Luce Line Trail have our hearty approval. The size of the ring is agreeable to us at their discretion. ) -----'/<»hn Burger <1 V Mary Oane Burger .< Sept.14,1993 The Orono Planninc Commission As neighbors of John and Marla Merideth, I wish to support their request to build a riding arena (4800 sq. ft.) on their property. lha.nk you for your favorable consideration. Sincerely yours IV CramKav 3760 Watertovm Road 27SO J^autcAJt^^Aj^ruJioaLdL MoLpL^ Aiinncsotrx^ S5559 ....... \ Memo to: Orono Planning Commission and Orono City Council Re: Variance Application #1858 September 13, 1993 65 North Stubbs Bay Rd. Maple Plain, Mn, 55359 This memo is regarding the application by John and Marla Merideth for a variance to build an enclosed riding arena. Our property adjoins the Merideth ’s farm from the east. As neighbors and property owners, we have no objections to their building an arena as requested. Thank you. September l6, 1993 Planning Commission We hare no objection to John and Karla Kerideth*s i*equest for a variance to build a larger than code riding ring. We are sure that the Kerideth's will do this properly and can't iragine that it would be a problem for anyone. ■a) V, September 13, 1993 Memorandum to: Orono Planning Commission Orono City Council I am writing in regard to the variance that John and Marla Merideth are seeking for their riding arena. As a neighbor and owner of property adjoining their property, I have no objections to their building an arena that is 4800 sq. ft. where they have designated it. Thank you. 25 North Stubbs Bay Rd. Maple Plain, Mn. 55359 . A - . \r ..*7... lA.'l. *-A. % f-lL-^3 John Ka-«"Ta t.h ?^R5 Wo+p-»“tovn P<’. Maple PlP*’n, MN. 55393 T have no 0>^>cf on to the vaHance requenteJ for your overfil*^e ^nf’oor* rii^in^ arena which you want to hu’l<^. r September 13, 1993 To: Orono Planning Commission and Orono City Council I am writing to suppport the request submitted by John and Marla Merideth for a variance to build an indoor riding arena. As a neighbor and owner of adjoining property, I have no objections to their building an oversize building in their pasture for a riding arena. Thank you. Gerald Wolff 75 Stubbs Bay Rd. Maple Plain, Mn. 55359 ..._. .• tS’ I A.' 10. TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:September 8. 1993 SUBJECT: #1859 Jeffrey Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive - Variances - Public Hearing Applicant proposes complete replacement of the detached garage within the street yard of the propeny . The structure at 722.4 s.f. would require a 10’ side setback and a variance that would allow detached structure to be placed in front of the front line of the e.xisting residence structure. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F) - accessory structure at 722.4 s.f. must be located 10’ from side lot line. Required = 10’ Proposed = 8.5’ Variance = 1.5’ or 15% Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) - no detached strucuire can be placed within a street yard located in front of the front line of the principal structure. The garage is located 80’ in front of the front line of the principal s’ncnire and 80’ from the street lot line (73 ’ traveled portion Bederwood Drive). Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) Lot area = 34,794 s.f. Allowed = 5,219.1 s.f. or 15% Existing/proposed = 2,701 s.f. or 7.8% Section 10.22, Suixlivision 2 A. Hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area = 400 s.f. or 22.86% (allowed 25%) B. Hardcover within the 250-500’ setback area = *7,356 s.f. or 22.99% (30% allowed) C. Hardcover within the 500-1,000' setback area = *210 s.f. or 20% (35% allowed) *Shed at 500 s.f. is owned by neighboring property owner and encroaches within applicant ’s property and must be credited against applicant s hardcover. nr ^4 Zoning File 4^1859 September 8, 1993 Paee 2 List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Hardcover Fact Sheet E - Elevations F - Profiles/Cross Sections G - Survey Description of Request Applicant seeks setback variances for the reconstruction of a 24’x30’ garage located within street yard. Garage is in a serious state of disrepair and in need of replacement. The City has received no comments from adjacent neighbors. Structural improvements are at 7.8/^ and hardcover is conforming. As already noted above, the 500 s.f. ot neighbor s shed has been credited against applicant’s hardcover. Review Exhibits E and F, the structure will once again be relocated within the hill minimizing visual impact of structure. Roof will be at a 4-12 pitch at a maximum peak height of 12’. Struemre will not e.xceed the height of the existing principal structure. Statement of Hardship Existing house is located to the rear of the long, narrow lot; elevations to the east of the property are steeper and to relocate a garage to the rear would require major land alterations and result in an increase in hardcover. Placement of the garage within the hill minimizes the impact of the structure within the street yard. Issues for Consideration Can detached garage be reinstalled to meet 10' side setback, since new structure will require additional land alterations?----or will this impact access drive to north? ch o ^ i) CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE ATP Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no chance from original applica.ion) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After—the“Fact Fees (Double application i.ee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site . Lo\0& Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.)- --- --- - - - - -- Attach legal description to application if not 'A i included on required survey. Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do* not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; _ _ _residential - - -other(specify) Zoning District:,_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT Name ^ C^QELLE^I Address : Z2.2. £~D£g>tJ00t) City: Lor\ib LS\^£ Phone (home) j'h^O______ ___ Phone (work) ^30 Zip: 5S^S6 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ~72,0(1 9 Describe request in detail: ^^—QjJJ... ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot WidthLot Area _ _ _ Setback: Front Side Hardcover __ _Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify)_ HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual prop y conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requiremen s.------------ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Qf the following information must be sabraitted by the application dead 1 ine"date in order for your application to be co sidered complete; 1, „y^Coinpleted Application Fora 2. w^ertified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3, '^Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4, ,_^Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8J5"xll" for reproduction). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8S”xll").m w ^ w —' — 7. an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of ’ any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __^Adaitional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above informabion has notbeen included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Coning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature "V,If.Date ^ {Jfn ' ' ■ 'OWNERS SIGNATURE 1/ The owner hereby ackowlec^ges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City stiiff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature O.Date ^ V/Applicant must have a3^ submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commissiev. Meetings are held on t e third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cammission and Council. If an applicant xs unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zon ng Office of this change prior to the meeting. (:.) " .' f220 "W ^ If. 9^ ••^ EILEEN ST p''5 H UD noi 21 'S . . 5'1?3TTT ,v MMv ■“ » 13 .4••* : 1 0 (^117 t 10 (i’8) e —li----■ t 'W 15 ••» t i«. 2 "■' .5 l*’--- '^ 1 -44-^/L. \rtf -Ml T » p K i •3 10> (5: '^>1 m1T5 e:5 2J / i »7)4' / /: (13) r............ « ^ {}*) >“ 5 (») R ^^ f?t) R ^(?7) B . « 4 ( 12) « Pf^ 1 K r « A?> ‘*1P(I9)>^^ a' ■•" (») w St ^ Q W Q (26)(2*2) " R V II R l!! * K*5 (23) * s« (n) •"* (ft) *' '‘!fil: ■<0 *(23)t( JS 0“ c -NO- -64^ ^ ' (30) Tjr?T / / / Oi ‘ / (45)-^ / / / .3 -t I :c |» 'V' -jmrnri g 1 N ^ r\42) ^ ^ \ Q(30' ^ B lio *''X ^ o '5 4 • -1 ^ (40) ^J*(30;“ (O) 1 . »W.9^ > 4? ^ i. » V 15 B .1 rnrnri R (M) h ( (33 ) ^ f 4f0*/H01 B>A\4 (^6) \^,V ?0Q rx}. »* v\» T* : 4^ \ * if. ) •> 1 It I 1 RUN ORTC oa/zs/n IICf«l»PIN COUNTY PROPtrXY lUrORMATlC*! SYSTEM PROPERTY dfTERS LISTBATCH 009PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR TO 05-117-21 12 0010 01500 BAYSIOE RD V E NORTON ETAL VICTOR E NORTON 1500 BAYSIOE ROAD L0M8 lake »tl 55156 PROP AOOR OPtCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 50 05-117-25 12 0016 00010 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO S^ATE OF MirJN STATE OF MITW lONR) ELUCE LINE TRAIL! PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 30 05-117-21 11 0009 00010 ADDRESS UTEASSlCTiED JEFFREY 0 MUELLER JEFFREY D MUELLER 222 BEDERHOnO OR LONG LAKE tti 55156 PROP AOOR OFMER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 4 P A 50 05-li7-21 11 0015 OOOIB ADDRESS UNASSIGT'IEO V H LARSON ETAL VINCENT M LARSr** 1021 COLFAX AVE MPLS »tl 55605 10 05-117-23 13 ^ PROP AOOR 00018 ADDRESS ' Z OFtCR NAME VICTOR E NORTON TAXPAYER VICTOR E NORTON NAHE/ADDR 3560 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE ttl 5 € ‘ • i €'• 0060 WUlOSIGtItO i !■ G le 05-117-25 12 0012 00165 BEOERHOOO DR J SOUTER A 0 R 2ICK JOHN SOUTER A OAHIKA 2ICK 165 BEOERItOCD DR LONG LAKE !#! 55556 36 05-117-21 15 0005 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO G L GUSTAFSON ETAL GERALD L GUSTAFSON 200 DEDERtnOO OR L«» LAKE m S5556 16 05-117-21 15 0010 00222 BEOERHOOO DR JEFFREY 0 tWCllER JEFFREY 0 MUELLER 222 BE0ER««X)0 OR LONG LAKE MN 55556 30 05-117-25 15 0017 05560 BAYSIOE RO A A B BALG.~ARO ALVIN T/BEATRICE H EALGAARO 5560 BAYSIOE RO LONG LAKE !t! 55556 TOTAL BATCH 009 00015 REPORT NO. PI655601 PAGE 3058 05-117-23 12 0015D0200 BEDER!«00 OR G L A J H rLISTATSON JOANN H GUSTAFSON 200 CEDCRltCOO ORIVE lOt<G LAKE »a< 55556 ■ I 58 05-117-25 15 0006 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICNPO JEFFREY D MUELLER JEFFREY 0 tKtLLER 222 BtOERHOOO OR LONG LAKE !5I 55556 38 05-117-25 15 0011 00220 BEOERHOOO OR G A J GUSTAFSON GERALD L GUSTAFSON 200 BEDERNOOD DRIVE LONG LAKE ni 55556 Wssslei 50 05-117-25 11 0061 05568 BAYSIOE RD J H A J P BARTLETT JEFFREY A JO ArflJE BARTLETT 5568 DAYSIDE ROAD LONG LAKE l»! 55556 MM DATE 08/25/93 I BATCH 009 HrrSiCPIH COUNTY PROPERTY IMfOKfUTlCSN 5YSTXH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. P1A35R01 PAGE 391 ' 1 1 % , I * i- I i •1 »‘k •% ' ■ -i; ;• Cn 'i* '• 'I'.' V’ e CI'A* •M 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OtT THE RECORDS OF THE HENTTEPIN COUtTTV DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND DELIE DAT QO p VI • .f • •• I r HARDCOVER CALCULATION KORKSHEEl SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0*75' 75-250* (j50-5C0^ 500-1000'*D Ex IS TING H ardcover in Zone • A. H ouse ^9.J X o ,3 _ • S.7 LENGTH WIDTH ys.i X /X 5*a s-/r.7 s.c. /^. /X /y. 3 e yv-f.T s.v. • a. 7 X /S. 3 __ s... •X S.F. E.G arage X JO. /722 S.F. C.D riveway .X ¥/00 S.F. X SXI • S.F. D.Sidewalk v.X 73,3 __ 7^ S.F. Cv^JCK ^X ZS / 2. • t X 0.73 :3 ^ S.F. C^i^c. X. ^ <€. <f r :?? fre^r 7. s X /. ^a 7 S.F. E. ,’at Io/ D eck 2 f-j :X S.S a .S.F. " - J.*> :K S. 3 2/ F. Landscap ------->* :<a SSO S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY X s S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING Ccy^CiS X • • S.F. CcA/£LS (i37 >f •. y S.F. T/^€0 G. Other x * ) • ss S.F. • ^ Total Hardcover in Zone 71 SS S.F. Total Property Area IN Zone S.F. A 71 S6 4 B X inn • 72.9? . • . B • ••• •« j ... HARDCOVE.R CALCULATION KORKSHEET SETBACK zone: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' <|00-100^ Existing Hardcover in Zone r'uc r<- Ti 1r jL TT—•' *■• ‘ 'N •■^■"^5 {; :) '^•j qJ • : ■ 4^. ft^i a ■ r ^ a VI' t MMkflrtfttfr'hMVr*^! li i vr^ -• . «i^"Mf iV ratk.a •ki^ iUlSr.£«£S ^ > ir^-« -“ •» ar* »a»' i I 'r.a 1- • -^■. w tdWiif*jMr. —wn*. sik 1 I o !! '! o •I M r, Cl Q T # C7 ni<r 5 2c 0rrn ->’^'it «*v4a'*>YV'r-T*'t'>f . f 1 «■ rt t.-i ri « vtt > .. If il&MlAf r i ^ — .i -. ar.* . r-*-11h . r .•■“-^Illftt. .-j rw- ^MwbV-■ »4-*’1*WTM.I - n Iftl r* .1 - - 1 » ■«-I 1 .. n it itte « f «•.- v 1 ■ I %.i f f .>n>-i L ^ l‘*-•v'.* LJjliLV^ i . -'•arif #• iiii^ k< X O ^O ^ rts’>■ "ns ' SIDE« Q)t;»LT 1/OTo \\^a 'I'U AEfGfiT ^ S»bt. ^T »; -t / ^ )2 ^I'XK urLf.<> / 3oa'3 / O ej) <!j ( ftptJf.M i-/‘if;U’’S ZT Ir ;^r' ■ {^)^LL I J « ^1. r i i&: 1' \ \ 9xO"/’f V-1 C'^ss O'-\ » • - • w •■ >{xg, y: £_dx r 2r*r. 1 X^ - • -’z • #K * "7 f’*'I cf.'C Ofr^r'3 »’ j .-, . JK u - . ? -I w.*' » • J) /Z 6ii<ct Ca^>V^ ifcr */ M <x\ ‘ f |[ •U, ! O fj V/i Tf ^J z r ' -i V /» 16 <7C . 2 £fa> l?L)'iS i/” £CrO r. r • 52; 'z\'H sno'^ ? £ / /• ’J'x t o Mg' & sw Xmzzm T3 oo H -< Z (/>I § CO Cdo« CO CO ft® CO Cft >co COc p> zo too CO To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building Sc Zoning Administrator September 16, 1993 /!^1860 Zelma McKinney, 3599 Livingston Avenue Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing The applicant has owned the property since May of 1962 and at that time the existing triplex use would have been permitted. Since that time, three major zoning ordinances have been approved whereby only single family residential use would be allowed of subject property. The applicant now wishes to sell the property as a legal duplex and seeks approval of a conditional use pennit iliat would recognize the non-conforming use as a legal use. The following ordinances are pertinent to the review; 1.Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (1) - Duplex credit. One duplex may be located on a single lot as a conditional use upon application therefore provided that public sanitary sewer service is available, and the lot is adjacent to a commercial or industrial district, and the duplex is constructed within 200 feet of the commercial or industrial district. A duplex is denned as a two-family unit residential building. Please refer to Exhibit C. Note property is not adjacent to a conunercial district and could not legally apply for a duplex credit. 2.Ordinance No, 45, Exhibit I. Tlie very first ordinance calling for single family residential use witliin the district. This was approved after the applicant purchased the property (5/62 purchase, Ordinance passed 8/62) and note ordinance did not require non- conforming uses to apply for conditional use permits to continue a non-conforming use. 3.Section 31.100 of 1968 Code, Exhibit J. Once again, single family use was reaftlnned but now a conditional use permit was required for all non-conforming uses. 4. 5. Section 31.100 of the 1975 Code, Exhibit K, repeated the same as the 1968 Code. Section 10.03, Subd. 5 (A-J) of your current Code, pages 251-253. Conditional Use Permit required to allow non-conforming use to continue subject to all pertinent ordinances. 6. Section 3.05, Subd. 11, E.xhibit G - Separate Service Duplex units located in one building on one parcel of property and owned by one owner mav be served by a shared or single service. The residence shall be sold as owner occupied duplex unit. J r Zoning File /S'1860 September 16, 1993 Page 2 of 5 List of Exhibits A A-1 B C D E F VJ H I J K L M Applieat’on Audenjum Property Owners List Plat Map Floor Plan. Second Floor Apartmer> Building Permits Issued 1937 Building Permit Application 1978 Section 3.05, Subd. 11-Separate Service Survey Ordinance No. 45, 8/62 - First Ordinance Calling for Single Family Use Section 31.100 of 1968 Code - Required CUP’s for Non-Conforming Uses Section 31.100 of 1975 Code - Also Required CUP’s for Continued Non- Conforming Use Building Inspection Notice - 9/9/93 Letter from Adjacent Landowner Description of Request Mr. & Mrs. McKinney purchased their home in May of 1962. The home at that lime contained rental units. Rental use has continued to the present. Basement unit is not occupied, hut the second floor rental unit is currently occupied by two people. Mrs. McKinney has been advised that if she is to sell her home as a duplex, she must seek to make that use legal, via a Conditional Use Permit. She has been asked to provide evidence that the u.se existed back to 1962 and that the use continued through the years without a lapse in time. The applicant has provided income tax record and original handwritten rent receipt records for the years not covered by the tax record to confirm that property has been a rental property through her ownership.* Review Exhibit E. A building permit was issued in 1957 and the City noted the following on the permit: "This house is being used for multiple dwelling." Review Exhibit F, as late as 1978, the City was approving building permits for improvements to the apartments. The structure is currently divided off into three separate apartments. The lower level basement walkout cannot support a bedroom per current code. Applicant is not proposing a triplex but seeks approval of a duplex. The second apaiiment is located on the second floor, review Exhibit D. * Staff will have this information at your meeting Zoning File #1860 September 16, 1993 Page 3 of 5 The Building Inspector was asked to inspect tlie facility. As City lacks a housing code, there are limits as to what can be required by the City at this stage. Review Exhibit L. fhe following was noted by the inspector and should be enforced whether this conditional use permit is approved or not: 1. There were no permits issued for the central air conditioning unit, furnace, and basement bath. Contractor should be asked to come back and obtain tne necessary City permits. Inadequate clearance for second floor apartment’s upstairs fireplace and should he corrected prior to property being offered for sale. 3.Property is served by municipal water and the former well should be abandoned. Applicant should obtain the necessary permits from State Health Department and provide City with a copy of certification that well has been abandoned. 4.Inspector notes that there is no legal egress from windows in basement for bedroom use. If duplex use is approved, staff would recommend that applicant pay for the necessary SAC charge to the Metro Waste Control Commission (MWCC) ($750.00) and applicant is further advised that she can apply to the MWCC for a refund of 20% of the fee. Based on the 1968, 1975 and current code, if a non-conforming use existed on any land or buildings prior to 1968/1975 codes that use may continue pursuant to obtaining a conditional use permit and that the non-conforming use be governed eneral by the standards set forth under the non- conforming use section of the code (A-J). Applicant has applied under Section 10.03, Subd. 5 for a conditional use permit to allow the duplex to be recognized as a legal non-conforming use. Per that Code, this use could never be expanded (i.e. triplex or structural addition to expand area). General repairs of the structure can never c.xceed 50% of the fair market value of said strucmre. This property has contained a non-conforming use for ove- 31 years. Alterations may be made to a building containing lawful non-confoVming residential units provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or bulk of the building. Any addition to this structure that would expand the apartment can not be allowed and the future owner or prospective buyer must be made aware of the special controls now placed on the property if it is to be recognized as a legal non-confonning use.. The applicant is specifically offering this property for owner occupied use only. Tiis should be included as a condition of approval. Review Exhibit H. The property has adequate area with a grassed yard. There is a two-stall garage providing at least two parking stalls for both owner and renter. There is adequate area on site to serve additional off-street parking. This is a comer lot and it is important tliat off-street parking be provided for residents of the duplex. 1 Zoning File #1860 September 16, 1993 Pige 4 of 5 Review Exhibit M. The letter from Karen Cuff asks that the property be sold as a single family home to preserve the interest ot all single family homeowners within the neighborhood. The letter notes the City’s plan to rezone. The application does not involve a rezoning but the request of an owner to continue a non-conforr.’ing use that would have been granted an automatic conditional use permit at the time of lUe zoning amendments in 1968 or 1975. The problem is that average homeowners are never aware of major zoning changes that may affect their property. The McKinneys w'cre never aware that they should have filled for a cond.tional use permit with the City. The City has received calls from other neighbors stating that they had no problem if it was to be recognized only as a duplex and to be sold as an owner occupied property. Issues for Consideration 1. It will not be necessary for members to go inside the structure as the inspectors have confirmed the floor plan of the second flo<^r rental unit. There is an exterior stair access at the rear and an emergency access throu^jh the interior hall to the front door. Review the property, specifically the yard, can this residence function as a legal duplex providing adequate f .trking off site? What other facilities should be provided for legal duplex? 2. Review the standards under the non-conforming use sections of the code that are pertinent for the duplex use. Are there other controls that should be written into this specific conditional use permit, i.e. owner occupied, no bedroom use of basement area? 3 Is it too late to grant a conditional use permit for this non-conforming use? Members should be aware that Mrs. McKinney did not know that she had any issue with the City until her agent was advised of the zoning issue. Applicant has provided documentation that use existed prior to August 27, 1962 and in addition that use continued without lapse through the period. The code does not specifically state there is a deadline for the filing of such conditional use permit. Can you Iceally deny this conditional use permit? Members may wish to refer to Section 10.09,^ Conditional Uses, specific.-.lly Subd. 6 (A) (1-3), the necessary findings for granting Conditional Use Pennits. 4. Upon your site inspection, does this residence appear any different from any of the other Navarre Heights residences ... physical appearance ... its use? 5. Other issues raised by Planning Commission members. Zoning File 4^1860 September 16, 1993 Page 5 of 5 Options of Action If application for CUP is denied. Planning Commission members must provide a deadline for the phasing out of the second noor rental apartment currently occupied. At the time the building is vacated by all renters, speciric structural modifications would be required, i.e. removal of kitchen facility in second tloor and basement apanments and any other structural modifications that would deter use of either the basement or second door as a residential umt. 1. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Isv OR If approved, the following conditions should be considered in your approval: All pertinent standards set forth under non-conforming use sections of the code listed under Section 10.03, Subd. 5. 2. Removal of kitchen within basement. 3. Disclaimer that basement area could never serve for legal bedroom use. Legal abandonment of well through appropriate permits via S.ate Health Department. Applicant to obtain permit from City to make necessary alterations to fireplace in second floor apartment maintaining clearance. The property must be sold and retained for owner occupied use only. Second floor apartment may never be expanded by a stnicmral addition to residence. .-\pplicant to assume responsibility to see that appropriate contractors tile tor the necessary permits for recent improvements specified in inspector ’s notice. Adequate off-street parking to be provided for two residential units. How many spaces? Payment of a SAC tee of $750.00. Any other conditions deemed necessary by Planning Commission members.1 CITY OP OROHO - GEIIEHAL LxViD USE APPLICAT#^/ ^ ^ ^'T |5 O O Site Address Lll//A/^$reA^ /k^& muzarii.. ^r, S5;-^9/ ^ % y-7-yy 7-7-2 J • ,A Property Identification Number (P.I .D. ) J1 ^ C>0^_1 Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Name //. /^/A/Ajey^ Phene (home) Phone (work)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OWNER Address 35^^^ i)VjA/4^rfiAJ /hC____________ City .. (if different than applicant) Phene (hone)----------------—---------------- 6Am^ ___________________ ---------------------------------- City ____________ Name Address Zip Date Proper£jL_Acquired A1/n/ //. ______,------ (roonth/year) I (do)^d'do also own the adjacent _ _ _ _ _ FEES — CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CDP application $125.00'Residential accessory Use / . $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use • ' • . • .__ _ _ $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain - - - Gradinc and filling - 101 cn. yd. or more lakeshoro - - - trading, seawall, retaining walls within /5' of lakeshoro - •••'. u » w .•r >.* .. . to.* ♦ • . i* > • U’ V • < - n. \ .\r * _ A • ' . * * • V •,* ••• PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Pee - $100.00 (no change from original application) A£t«-the-Paot Pee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation ^ Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan A.mendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zonino District ~ f d- Present Use of Property '— \ Residential) Other'^specif y) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST . . . Describe request'in detail: CVutifJUt- OLCuPteti 'buPLf_)i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. N Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this lisr from Henneoin County Department of Fin^^ce-A—603 Governmen Center 348-3271). Plat Mao. 2. 3. August 26, 1993 I Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 tJ w Re: Conditional Use Permit Application 3599 Livingston Avenue Dear Ms. Mabusth: This letter is written on behalf of Mrs. Zelma McKinney, property owner and resident of 3599 Livingston Avenue. The above referenced property was purchased by Mr. and Mrs. Harvey McKinney in May of 1962 as their sole residence. At the time of purchase, the house was divided for use as a triplex, utilizing the 2nd stoiy, first level and walk out basement as separate units. The house has been used as an owner-occupied rental properly continuously since shortly after date of acquisition. The 2nd level apartment has seldom been vacant for longer than the turn around time necessary for cleaning and repairs. The lower unit has occasionally been vacant for a month or so, and is currently not occupied. Going forward, it is the intention of Mrs. McKinney to continue to rent the 2nd level unit and occupy the firs: level, until such time as she is ready to sell the property. The ability to sell this property for its full value is dependent on obtaining a conditional use permit which would allow future owners the right to continue the use as owner-occupied rental property. Since purchase in 1962, many physical improvements have been madv to the subject property to retain the value of the asset and to enhance the Image of the neighborhood. Granting of the requested conditional use permit will be an acknowledgement of Mrs. McKinney's contributions as a responsible homeowner and taxpayer. A list of the requested attachments is enclosed as are all of the documents relevant to consideration of this request. Please feel free to contact me if there are questions on any of the submittals. Thank you for your time. Sincerely,irely, , ^ Gayle/Mcninney S^/er7 Home Phone: 439 - 6124 Work Phone: 786 - 9705 1410 Meadowlark Drive Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 i A#' ,.uHUM OAT€ Oa/25/9SV,BATCH 003 ! POOP AOOR r.^CMCR HAHE r-TAXPAYER .|* ^‘7*. NAHE/ADOR i f/ ft. -. s, ■ ■• !’ •■ •*9'* * ‘ » ‘.•J pnop Aom 'il OMCR NAHE fi. TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR -I PROP ADIM /•A'.- ?jj ONNER NAHE . TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR:-y . ,•f*.*'• iii tVf. 'r < l PROP ADOR t ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADORA ,fN aoor t v' OMCR NAHE u \. •r ■' 1 r? TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR (fi'lT; ;./- . it ■ kV *{p0- • ^ d PROP AOORrfwr lAvun OMCR NAHE ' TAXPAYER = NAHE/AONAHE/ADDR 38 17-117-23 34 001102345 BLAINE AVE VIL OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY m 55359 38 17-117-23 34 0024 02265 BLAINE AVE DONALD J FRETLANO DONALD J FRETLANO 4940 VIKING DR 8306 HPLS m 55435 38 17-117-23 34 0027 03630 LIVINGSTON AVF BARBARA D SENGER BARBARA D SENGER 3630 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 3A 17-117-23 34 0034 03690 LYRIC AVE BARBARA J LAGIESKI BARCARA J LAGIESKI 3690 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0041 03665 LYRIC AVE H 6 A D F SHERMER CHARLES B PETERSON 3665 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0044 03635 LYRIC AVE DEAN H A MURIEL LATTIN DEAN H A MURIEL LATTIN 3635 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 V. '0‘ f ■ I. (D HENT4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST38 17-117-23 34 001202389 BLAINE AVE R H A N M MARDIt4G ROBERT H HAROIfK^ P 0 BOX 83 2394 BLAir^E AVE NAVARRE MN 55392 38 17-117-23 34 0025 02265 BLAINE AVE LAM FLORIAN LAHRENCE R FLORIAN 421 CAPRICORN ST MISSION TX 78572 36 17-117-23 34 0028 03640 LIVINGSTON AVE M R LAPINSKI A C A LAPINSKI MARK A CARLEEN LAPINSKI 3640 LIVirrcSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0035 03650 LYRIC AVE LESTER V MOLENAAR ET AL ALICE SYMONS FROST 3650 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0042 03655 LYRIC AVE HAL FELKER HARLAN A LOLA FELKER 3655 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0045 03625 LYRIC AVE KATHLEEN L FINE KATHLEEN L FINE 3625 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 7 . \38 17-117-23 34 002302255 BLAINE AVE II L BAKKEN AMI BAKKEN HAROLD L BAKKEN 1365 16TH AVE N N NEN BRIGHTON MN 55112 38 17-117-23 34 0026 03600 LlVINGSTOr^ AVE D E SHAN JR A J M SHAN PENNEY L SHAH 130 HOOD DUCK LA OROTK) MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0033 03692 LYRIC AVE JANE P GROSS JANE P GROSS 3692 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0036 03640 LYRIC AVE GERALD LEE SIM0f4S0N GERALD LEE SIMONSON 3640 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0043 03645 LYRIC AVE B J A K L HABAS BRIAN J HAtAS 3645 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0046 03615 LYRIC AVE LAHRENCE GRAHAM LAHRENCE H GRAHAM 3615 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 1 •1 I I V.. 1^- *. i PUN DATE OB/Zl/n5 y^BAKH DOSI«PROP ADDR • V ONNER NAME /■. ; TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 0{ /%* V t - j.V’ PROP AOOR } Q»MER NAME . tyTAXPAYER ^ NAHE/AOOR ♦J* •• • • • $ Vf* PROP AOOR •;/<|^0»MER NAHE Aklvi TAXPAYER•s'-.IS .'■f- NAHE/ADOR ♦ ! * » % * V '•'.tPROP AOOR as S^O»fCR NAHE ■4; TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR • r*. >w’%**• i.' ^ %•f 1V' PROP ADDR OMNER NAHE t TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR(m ii'- ! I /4r PROP AOOR . ?-;„ONNER NAHE r,; TAXPAYER • ■•V4 j ''' • ' fv-r.-«.• HEttlEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST38 17-117-25 34 004700038 AOORESS UNASSIGNED RAN HARDING ROBERT H HARDING P 0 BOX 83 2394 BLAINE AVE NAVARRE FM 5S392 38 17-117-23 43 0028 03555 CRYSTAL PL DEAN YOUNG DEAN YOUNG 3555 CRYSTAL PLACE NAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0034 0359A LIVINGSTON AVE HARVEY 6 REOER HARVEY 6 REOER 3598 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0041 03520 LIVINGSTON AVE GENEVIEVE H EBERT GENEVIEVE E EBERT 3520 LIVINGSTON AV NAYZATA tt4 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0046 03541 LIVINGSTON AVE RAJ PICHA ROBERT H A JEAM41NE H PICltA 5930 SEAMANS OR EXCELSIOR 55331 NAHE/AOOR 38 17-117-23 43 0049 03577 LIVINGSTON AVE ELIZABETH J BALTER ELIZABETH J BALTER 3577 LIVINGSTON NAYZATA HN 55391 » •i:N 38 17-117-23 34 004800030 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO CITY OF OROMO CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MM 55323 38 17-117-23 43 0032 03593 CRYSTAL PL F J MOSCHINI E.'AL DANIEL J RADFORD 1246 90TH ST E INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55075 38 17-117-23 43 0035 03580 LIVINGSTON AVE H AN0ER3ON/B BEGIN-ANOERSON H ANOERSON/B BEGIN-ANOERSON 3580 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0044 03525 LIVINGST0T4 AVE S PUGH A T SOBERG SUSAN PUGH A TERRENCE SOBERG 3525 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0047 03551 LIVINGSTON AVE DAVID N REINHOLO DAVID N REINtlOLO 3551 KINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0050 03505 LIVINGSTON AVE GREGORY S GOODFELLOW ET AL GREGORY/ELIZAOETH GOOOFELLON 3505 LIVINGSTONE AVE NAYZATA LW 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 030 17-117-23 43 002703533 CRYSTAL PL PAUL R ANDERSEN OAUL R ANDERSEN 3533 CRYSTAL PL NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0033 03599 CRYSTAL PL HERSEL H FORESTER HERSEL FORESTER 3599 CRYSTAL PLACE NAY NAYZATA FW 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0040 03556 LIVINGSTON AVE C D A N LONG CHRISTIAN 0 i NANCY LONG 3556 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0045 03533 LIVINGSTON AVE PETER F NIESEN JR ETAL MR PETER F NIESEN 3533 LIVINGSTON AVE NAVZATA MN 55391 J i 38 17-117-23 43 0048 03559 LIVINGSTON AVE D LEFEBVRE » L S CARNES DOMINIC LEFEBVRE 3559 NINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0051 03599 LlVXtJGSTON AVE ZELMA H MCKIHIEY ZELMA H MCKIFA4EY 5599 LIVINGSTON NAYZATA JIN 55391 •ir RUN DATE Oa/25/95 BATCH 005 HErt4EPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INF0RMATI0T4 SYSTEM PROPERTY 0I#4ERS LIST REPORT NO. PI<455<#01 PAGE 9 PROP ADDR VCMCR NAME :V%TAXPAYER NAME/AODR u*’ t ''.PROP AOOR ,:;^‘OHNER NAME . • '•( TAXPAYER ^ NAHE/AODR 4.::C:.r ^ ■ '» ■ TtV'i .. ■ PROP AOOR ,,rA.O»tlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR - y}\ '' '■ K 't- % * "PROP ADDR , c OlfCR NAME • TAXPAYER . V NAHE/ADOR ( ♦ V C ■; ■ri H ^tr• r f PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR A * 1 • 4 ^ C*-U; PR0P ADDR dtCR NAME ’ rf TAXPAYER name/aoor^ Vv 50 17-117-25 <^5 0055 05554 LYRIC AVE R D BARTELL IKK BARTELL ROLAND D/KIHBERLY K BARTELL 5554 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA m 55591 ’ 56 17-117-25 45 0102 05525 LYRIC AVE TODD J BAUER TODD J BAUER 5525 LYRIC AVE HAYZATA m 55591 56 17-117-25 45 0105 05559 LYRIC AVE KEITH A BERARD KEITH A BERARD 5559^ LYRIC AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0145 *05585 CRYSTAL PL EVELYN J LANGE EVELYN J LANGE 5565 CRYSTAL PL HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0150 05572 LIVINGSTON AVE MARK N I KAREN L CUFF HARK H I KAREN L CUFF 5572 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 005 00051 I 58 17-117-25 45 0056 05556 LYRIC AVE RICHARD R GILMORE CHARLES LENIS HEMCE 5556 LYRIC AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0105 05541 LYRIC AVE DONNA M LIEN DONNA LIEN 1214 LONGHOOD ST NEST PALM BEACH FL 55401 58 17-117-25 45 0106 05505 LYRIC AVE SECURTY BNK/TRST CO TRUSTEE GARNET JUE44KE 5585 LYRIC AVE HAYZATA ?iN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0140 05554 LIVI44GSTON AVE RIM PETERS ROBERT LESLIE PETERS 5554 LIVINGSTON AVE NAVARRE MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0151 05572 SHORELINE DR LAKE MTKA ANIMAL H05P INC LAKE MTKA ANIMAL HOSP It4C 5572 SHORELINE DR NAVARRE MT4 55592 50 17-117-25 45 0057 05520 LYRIC AVE J I V NEGLEY JAM2S I VICKY NEGLEY 5520 LYRIC AVE N HAYZATA m 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0104 05551 LYRIC AVE N R OOHMEN I D H DOHMEN NICHOLAS I DEBORAH DOHMEN 5551 LYRIC AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 50 17-117-25 45 0107 05590 SHORELINE OR EVERARO GEYEN EVERARU GEYEN BOX 64 M0Ut4D m 55564 58 17-117-25 43 0149 05574 SHORELINE OR R L I G H PLAISTEO RICHARD L/GLORIA H PLAISTEO 3574 SHORELINE DR HAYZATA MN 5S591 38 17-117-23 43 0153 05596 LYRIC AVE MICHAEL E I LAURA J SHAf^SON MICHAEL E & LAURA J SHANS0(4 3596 LYRIC AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 nT) Ifc KUN DATE 06/2.^/93OOS%»•rf ’•'V':‘‘v. . • *« A *. • >4.* .» .1 # 4 f r * /ir * •** yt t V ■ •,. 'i:' ? .> ^..•.. fj • M ** J li■ n^* ■■ "S' •i'. *. i CD <fv • C 4 «* •i. ,m vi- v • > f v?;vv‘- ■ y^‘\ vK"'' t . V ;^i: %• at 'i.'.v:i]‘^fVt-' ■■ -Tl^ ir .♦v''•yv ’’ ’’ ■■ •! . .... V ■rP'• ••H , ■'‘ • ^ '•«-.■ i.V ‘ • • / .»•<> :• • (^p '*i Av.| ■•'■■*• .’■' • '••* lIErJNEPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LIST REPORT tra. P1435401 PAGE 10 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEN-.EO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESEtfTATlON OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTJfTAXATION, TQ/fHE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. / / DATE' ' • • » ♦ \ . 1 •. < ' V i • k •- .it ■> ' A **> i • ; J ‘ • V : : 1: t- *• * p • f •. ' * V--'} ■: \d'r. } i/ , i» V \ r \ ' ‘ V ^:. r, n »» • # ► • 5 * • V C.^ ,. -k • *» •■ .*• *• / I • "• ; • t. ; . ^. ’• ►- r • •* .*. . » * . \ ^ 9 ^ . V*-*' S*: .•> r*^. •'Vi *•• v>-* •. ’• ‘ '.' ' \•* . *.r • V r. ^ * *^ • . • ' * . - • • . .*_’"«’ ^ I' ■ • a(, ■ • » ■*. ' ■•• . r . • K , "•C ^ •. •I**^N**'*»^'*,- ' i.'***^- iv ^ ‘** -.* — '■ ' '* • *» I r*' ■ ■ ■ ■ •: 'S-Jr. ■ •*.' : y - A .;;t : ./-V - * - i.. • • * •.;• V •... . * . .* . V • r;^; '■ -• :• . -,*• •.. . ' ••* . -7 rA • j ' *^- '*'/'• ;- -;• •* . • • . V- .; / !v ^ •>•:*;" .' .• ••• • ^ ^ ip v^.": .• , /;.*:■•■ 'vi 'I-v ':-;- • • ^ * • . A ‘ •« .« , • * • • m • .V.- 'i. \ Ki ‘0 *1)•rf}( * ■^4 o-^ -'tO ->| C-’1* ' • w •n -o • ^ NAVAf^Rr i-X. • - ‘ -•: •..-•./> , '•-- A • -* •'^Z 'k'*' «*• . •V/vP ' *.•,•> f ' .-VkV* * .'. • . ‘ - ».^ - *■• . * . ** .• ; '•« t? . tf ••..* ^ ’vr. ' -• Ik QCT , • •. I V ^ U t • V. V , '^• . * '• *. * t ■' c: «• »M !) ^ -mSP' ,. 55JM5 ::i"‘ij4 5 " £■=,», «> -‘^,vf5 ^ HI S ^ 134 5 ^ >8 ° ti IJ4..5 « L\ 134.3 V {45 lllJv. tf ^ {» ’i 134 5 i N K. • « o43 i K j; 3-«V4 5^^ « .54-5 h; ___ 'j^ -O \ 134 5 « i - “ 154.5 ” iA.!*' '•iSV.K s ” >•: 1 ,154.5 J5 ^ ® )?*: :•< w* y 1 IM.S « S ' >•'- 154 5 >? 3 m 154.5 a 2<" >•■ ^.J54.5 *iilxs « 3 ^.“_J54.5| X* f 11 etA-I-Ne -M€ IM 5 HI J' L4< • 35 M9. 3' ‘*t49.?ii~ ’ *-5 • ; 34 .5 «".54;5 « 'J! ^ ^ ^13?^ ^ m; 98 ^ a ia^^ yj o y 3 134.5 « 5 m.«^ .455. " « i:54.5^'a; V 13* . 5>j* cn — \ ^ '^134 !iTy.r ^ ' .5?^ o M5.*j 6 .>5 * K144 35 .54-^5_^ yj N o. 4__w_ a « .r,a 5.V,*'■'.'j K'^ VI4I>3 r ■ J34. i A Pi 134.5 yi>^ ^ X 140 cf|• ,.^^***^__ 8 a 5 - f' ____I.rj.5' : 4 134 5 J: '^■' 3 ,_ -_w 134. 5 . ) XI *: -- 13^ a 8 1___' W 5 _ / • ^1r?J» ik »SJ C«V4 3 ^>5 m"o9 ^ ^ '-5 - -- fv« 5 HI t'ji - x; - f V4 5 a -i V ».v ^ ^ = .34 *55 Oi A tii-iv ' 153 8? . • V ® CI3I 4 - "'^‘.34 ^ C ^ K ^ 2131 5- X5 '?• X PJ3L!^ >5 ® ^ ^ _ -»33-3^'57 V5 X I3fi. 7^ H) «o c* A C HI o» oi X ^ ^ 141.O’^ -' .9 9,, D ; • y ^. r.tc..; VILLAGE OF ORONO residential and CX)MMERCaAL BCilDIKGS owm BOILDII BUnJDINO LOCATION DiiwnwiiiMd I>nh>oq« COIWXBOCTIOII Bride. Seltd Brick V< C m»«bi Block ^ T-, (5 /\ floor li Bbo Tn» flooring i|wHni; B#<fT!n7 SlM Bridging » RAnXRS Sho » Bpodag ^ Sp«* CGLimO JOISTS 8bt Spodof 81m Sioli^y WiOi • ^ VHfnLAOON JUD UOR UfTlU Sto* LoeotSea WILL mt Loeotloa WkNk M* «• «. N *■ • '■ < lUMioia rar f •‘>1 •oik Tub iiom r ,-Ca INI KWAQi nrnrn motmud it MUOL '?' X. ’ ^ t - c.- /Vt •r, 4.. • DUiLDiNG PERMIT APPLICATION «« ' ‘w • * • • / — •« « a i4* ‘ V. . j • »*4r . i-CITY us?-ONLY BOILDIIIC FL.S..IT ■0.__ DATE ZONING DISTRICTmHRS tONE VAR. dXtE :<* >5m COND. USE DATE f WIDTH DEPTH SITE ADDRESS ^ d>^y<^y^*rsyi>yf ^%-.. ► LEGAL DESCRIPTION. PROP. ID./ LOT PLAT BLOCK SUBDIVISION PARCEL —'S'r, 7 (N.nnc) (Addrssa) OWNER _ _ _ _ (Phone) oasi PROPOSED SETBACKS! FROVr R. SIDE REAR f • L. SIDE * f.i LAKE WETLANDS ACCESS EXISTING APPR. DATE y PLAN REVIEW BY xV. - » iVi ^ SEPTIC 3' APP. DATE •« P PERMIT PEES ARCHITECT/ENGINEER-Must Certify Multi-Family, Commerelttl Industrial Construction Plana CERT. NO. • •:. :V A/E • . *j: . BUILDER (Finn) (Address) (Xfs/- (Fhona)m > 'M-X\S^ ’ ’ '*'1 K '*• (Firm) •• ■ . V .. « f-v « .***•-^ . -VK . ^ A • X'*1 TYPE OF WORK:NEW ADDITION CONST. TYPE kESIDENTIAL IRCIAL GAR. STALLS ATT. DET. BLDG. SIZE L. W. STORIES BDRMS/FLR B HT. iW EST. CONST. VALUATION DOCK RElWVATr^--£';SS -I • • .'r ? - ^ * .1^ .4 . „.•! . f.. V , . V * » • t-» • ** jk ftr*.■4» : *' , * a^A jk ft V* .V•. V.. ; *• -rcsv. ., ,.. w. »•. ^ - *yv?j^ ^4 » ... . ,.r-». .»• REMARKS: . . .S?35?5Ji ■'. vV; '., •■:-;■.; •*'■•■•; i-./jirvw .'• v?.*5;»r. BLDC. . PERMIT ii S|>;iB FEE_j2a£cJ j i . .•.•r •.•#■..<-'I.* I • *»>T.rt.WBLaraf •^vtx^frrt l.-f n> * • f; \ } i *I iV- I « ]ofi>^'e Stalu^luiiai^’^C^S ^ete 4tod KepTMeDtetlont >• A^rLT'/' *■ . « V'* -.-V./ •ji.* ^r< '• '-v " ■ I . ^ •• 1 ■ .r ,. . , , w i9**i;'ws^ i^'. ‘ f - '.'4 •'./•/;*. • '"■ - V V •» * - WtPMTPK)N MBOtNfllO • ‘4 MtULATlO«E • v-k' r. T.,..- \ ■:.. 1 "R*****L'. ^' Vf ' A*, ^ .;, ^-.-j VVOfIK REOUlfllMO 4 SEPARATE PERMITi : ei FLUMSI i ^ I .-J** • •*. * • • vyTtt.. § 3.05 shall specify the amount thereof, the description of the premises served, and the name of the owner thereof. The amount so certified shall be extended by the Auditor on the tax rolls against such premises in the same manner as other taxes, and collected by the County Treasurer, and paid to the City along with other taxes. Subd. 9. Damage to Municipal Utility Equipment. It is unlawful for any person to intentionally cause any damage to any municipal utility equipment or appurtenance, including, but not limited to, meters, street lights, water hydrants and curb cocks. Anyone causing such damage shall pay the reasonable value thereof to the Citv, including labor for renewal and installation of any equipment and shall be, in effect, *an insurer of any equipment in his possession or with which he comes in contact. 3ubd. 10. Municipal Utility Service Outside the City. The City Administrator is hereby authorized to furnish municipal utility service to consumers outside the City, provided, that such consumers specifically agree to all the terms of the City Code, including, but not limited to, rules, regulations and rates adopted thereunder and the right to specially assess delinquent services, charges and penalties. _____ _ Subd. II. Separate Services. Each separate occupied orooerty or each separate building or occupancy on a single property shall be served by and shall utilize a separate service connection not shared by any other property or occupancy,^.Including each unit of any townhouse developmerjji-f—UL ' commer-cia 1 occupancy under separate ownership, ^^xceptions^ v (1) duplex dwellings consisting of two residential^^wv^-fes—te^-^nte otti-ld'rng, on one parcel of property, owned by one owner; or‘^ (2) condominium, residential or commercial uses having more than'^one—owner within the same building,—wjiere the land and/or common areas of the building including"se^ice areas are owned in common or by an association; or (3) apartment buildings or leasehold commercial buildings having one owner but multiple tenants. ________ "SEC. 3.06. ~ CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO TAPPING OR CONNECTION. Prior to issuance of a permit to tap or connect a lot or parcel of land with a municipal utility, the City shall issue a certificate of compliance with one of the Subdivisions of this Section. Any certificate issued under this Subdivision shall provide that in the event of a subsequent assessment thereon for such utility, the amount of the assessment hereunder shall be credited against the subsequent assessment. Subd. 1. The certificate shall state that such lot or parcel has been specially assessed for its share of the cost of construction of the sewer or water main, as the case may be, that no installments thereof are delinquent or permit fees unpaid. ORONO CC (4-1-84) - • ^ ^ • •• • • —-> f- E6AM, FIELD c?i WOWAK SURVEYORS r :S21 HARRIET AVE. TiIAJ MINNEAPOUS, MlNNt$0TA CEEinraFB€A?E ©F 5WSIVEV arvey McKinney_ _ _ _ __ LlYlNaSTON AVENUE • • • • • • UJ LiJ Ul cQ \ Scale: 1" - 30’ escription: Lots 11 and 2, Block 4, Navarre teinhts. ow t hereby certMy thal this Is a true and correct representa 11 on o# a survey of le boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings f any, thereon, and all visible encroachments. If any, from or on said land# ited this 24th day of duly_ _ _ _ _^ 1969^ l0 No.I 1709 HBooK no. EGAN, FIELD A NOWAK ^Sui^eyor V0 ■ ^. »• • : ••.‘>• « .* -\*’* • •»*.:'n.V<'-’:>.v''“• ••• • > • ^ • . ' - VV ‘•'•.-V •.*» ,••• •-.•. •. } • ••■ • . • •1» • « k ■ . •••*4 • • . • . , - » • « ■ • r ■* . • • . • • * *-■••• * * - • . ••• ‘ r-t:* v-*‘i ..**■VjCj • i* •- -i «4^“ •. .. .. • • • • • • ■ .•*• •• • • • • • . . • •. - - ;• .. • •1,. • • * I . . . V; ;• •. ^ • o V ' . V 1 •• • f :• VILLAGE OF ORONO ORDINANCE NO. 45 An Ordinance !o Amend Section 30.030 of the Municipal Code. The Village Counci, of the Vil­ lage of Orono Ordains as follows: Section 30.030 cf the Municipal Code is here:-y amenuc 1 by the addition thereto of the following sub-sections: (3.) There shall be no dwell­ ings for more than one family upon any lot or parcel of land, and there shaH be but one single family dwelling upon each lot or parcel of land. (4.) Each structure to be used as a dwelling shall be set back from the street property line, or lines, at least 30 feet, and distant at least 10 feet from any side property line, and side or rear street; and any structure irre- specti%*e of design or use shall not be closer than 10 feet from the property line. This shall also include barbecue pits and similar types of construction not com­ monly referred to as structures; provided, however, that if a struc­ ture to be used as a dwelling or commercial building is to be con­ structed or moved onto a lot ad­ jacent to other lots upon which there are e.xisting residences or commercial buildings, such struc­ ture shall be so located on said lot in ^reference to the street property line, or if the lot is a lake front with reference to the lake front line, so as to conform generally to the building line of the residences or commercial buildings on such lots. (5.) No private garage shall be located closer than 30 feet to the street property line, nor closer than 10 feet to any other adjoin­ ing property line. Where the topography or use of the tract or parcel of land prevents such location, the Village Council may authorize, by special permit, other location of such garage. Section 2. Publication: The Ordinance shall be published in the Minnetonka Herald at Way- zata. Minnesota, and shall be ef­ fective immediately upon such publication. Passed by the Village Council of the Village of Orono this 27th day of August, 1962, by a vote of 5 yeas and no nays. H. R. Ross, Attest: Mayor. Donald J. Boll, Village Clerk. (8-30, ’62) •i ’•.^ i.** ‘4 - -• - f ' / • • •• « • -00 ( J;."- 1 . ! . -* .-* ■ I s r:Z'^:i *.* ^• ■■ ‘ '"'X "*•' 0, - _• • •• vT' -“v . .w? ^ » %r» ^ *• .'■Wi :^ •31.100 MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO lareed reconstructed or altered, and no structure or land shall be used for any purpose nor in any manner which is not in conformity with the Zoning Code. ________________ _ ______________ 31.100. Non-Conforming Useo. Any land or buildings w^ch were actually and legaUy devoted to a non-confonning use on March 10, 1967 may be continued in said non-couTorming use pursuant to con ­ ditional use permit granted pursuant to, subject to the following regula­ tions and such land or buildings may not be. 3L101. Changed to another non-conforming use; 31.102. Re-established after voluntary discontinuance of said use. such discontinuance having lasted for at least one year; 31.103. Extended in area. 31.104. No “junk yard” may continue as a non-conforming use under any circumstances. ________ mW^^rnWhere, however, such a situation existed legally under the pnor applicable law, the CouncU will not unreasonably require strict compliance generally look v^ith favor on granting of a vanance under 3-..300tr. 31.200. Existing Irits. A lot of record exi.^ng upon Sept. 14, (the effective date of the Zoning Code) under single separate owncnimp in a “R" Residential District, w’hich does not meet the requirements of the Zoning Code as to area or width may be util^ for a single family detached dwelling purpose provided that in the judgment of ^e council such use does not adversely affect public health or safety. Smgle sep­ arate ownerships includes joint ownership by not more than two persons. 31.210. One BoOding per Lot Except in the case of PlannedJR^ Ui. - m • . * ‘ . r -vV.U... -i,-:;. , ", • ‘ ' * I ' " ... . . • • k. ■ inilusid" said judqraent. 31.10 0. No.-^.-Confcrr.ino Uses, were'actual !'• anr. lecairy devored Jar.uar - i, 1*97 5. r.av be cor.rir.ued ours-aar.r ro cc-r.dlor.al use perr.it c;rar.-cu as ■- ^d . (.iuT.er.ded Crd. 17 2 , '12-1 5-7-:, eff Anv land or buildincs which to a non-conforrinc use on in sain non-confcrrinc use -3r^ir.^ft0r so0ci“ * /• ;Tr. w r. c r. *“ c c..• d'~**d. 171. 11 effecti'.'e 1-1-75) - • - --: rhis Zoninn Code snail nrevent tne • - • - >- ct^r. V. .i0:i i.axv-* -.w 7;:r::;:.r:.sutldin- msnectcr, nrovidmc ine_neces- ^-c snail ncr cons-itute rore man rO percent or .ne i:.::;.:'vs-ue cf sum structure. srruc-.ure s.na.l inclute • “* . __ __ _ _-Ke sn-ucture or locaren . . . . .■ .. . . . . inns, rarquees, ronurenus. •: \-r- 1-1 — 75) C .“i.= S £r.*c- c.:* Ilt.z, suer. 1 * • - _ 1 - / “t » “ — -r w -i.'« c.1 j- -r r. u • j? 0 - r - r. rr r. a .**1 - . . r., • Ca '*'* «.>• ^e , • - • — -a - — « r. - a - ^7. '• . d .a. • — r, - -! c*rr*.ir.c uss cr sp.y Y £. c b 0 0 P: C h r. r. C 6 - t C c C C T* P O T P*. j. *. ^ • •^r T.C app* r.cr.-ccr.pcrr.ir.p -•# *—T—.T-\\ •— c — vrUw-i..e - - use. • * • _—ure snail*• • ■4. never a lavru- nun-- - - - - - sc_jc.--- . .^.’111-.- h'- ■^ire. flood, e.xnlosion, eartnruaKe, ^ar, p;..- 'P:--.::”P'-r;-d-, m ra-.- he reconstructed and used as oefore ir:: :: :;:--;--ucted Wi-.hin twelve (12) ronths after such p*-::.vr. ‘ •.-PP’'uhe darace tc the builcinr: or structure is t '~5 i; or rore cf its fair rarxet va.ue at ^P.<.c:,rr.cnt records at the tire of darace, in wnicn c-.=P’-'- whole'uhferec: snail be denoiishec. and any construction r-.L-re-uf: t-r sinaij be for a use in accordance with tne proMsion -* V- \ r* *.* 4^ ^ ;• ^ f ^ ^ t-.ended"ordV’l72, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75) 31.115. Whenever a lawful non-conferrinc use of a structure ’3 disconuinued and rerains 3iscor.tinueo for a oe oc o_ .-T-. -enuhs, anv future use of said structure or IZZ^: •-.-.‘ir. con-'orrufv'with the nrovisions of this Zonina Co^e.sr*ali - -- - - - -(Ord. 172, 12-19-74, errective l-l-7o) '■'.106. Anv lawful non-confornina use of land not involvinc a atr-uoturi, and any lawful non-conforrinq use involving a 15 ■i < - V ^ ^ ;,«?<;P5sor's ^air market value upon the effec- s^ructure zoninq Code of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000) “"lesf n,°v be coftiiuL ?or a period of thirty-six (36) months “f-irtie effective date of this Zoning Cooe, whereupon such non- corfir^?.!®, usS Shall cease, unless brought into conformity witn the Zoninq Code. . a ■'c\ (Ord. 172, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-/5) 31.107. Any P-PO^d structure which be«n^aw-uUy''qran?ei no^'more^han six (6) months prior to the dat-'of thus Zoning Code, nay be completed in accordance wt^h^the-aonroved olans; provided construction is s.ar.ed wi.n-n s-ix (51 monchb of the effective date or this i,onina Code, and cor-'■•"u-=s to conoletion within two (2) years. Suen structure anruse“shall thereafter be a legally existi.nq non-conrorminc structure and use. _ (Ord. 172, 12-19-74, efrective 1-1-/3) 76rd.‘ 172, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-7d) -he livabilitv thereof, provided tney will not increase t..e n’-nbe- o" dwell ina units or bulk of the building. (5rd l?i, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75). 31.110. Anoiv to ’’Uses” Only. The non-conformina use pro- visicns*of the Zoning Code apply only to the use to which^lan a-^d buiidincs are out, and do not apply to situations ^ location or heicht of structures, lot size or other fac.o.s ,.o. ,-be use of the oremises prevent strict conrormanc with'ilVe're^uirements of 'the Zoni-q Code. Where, however, such a situation existed leoaliy under the prior applicaole law t..e Council will .not "unreasonably renuire strict com.o-iance * me-, cenerally look with favor on nrantinn of a variance under 3... ’1.200. Lot of Record. A lot of record is any lot -or^wniC" deed or registered lane survey has been recorded in the o.-icea deea or reqisLereu --* or the Renister of Deeds or the Reqistrar of Titles for t"* 2ountv, Minnesota, prior to January 1, 1975, and after approval bv the Citv Council if required. , , -,cx (Amended Ord. 172, 12-19-74, erfective 1-1-75) .anuary^;^197f(tnre^Mhv^ single*senarate ownership in an "R" District, which does c k .• 1 *.*•• •• n t -»4• •• ■***•♦'• **• I: ' * • • • -. V'J / V • “ ,* ' ■ • "V.^ ‘ ■ ' - . * ,............................................................................•..:;••••• . *r •jTfL '‘.e> r*.• • - ' » k •. . . r V •* ^ k .. *# .. • •: • •.»!■•• • • . ■ • .* •' ?- *v . ;• •: • •.' ‘•-‘ - -- * . • •-, / -. • ■ - . '• • V *• i y» • » 9 ■.•• * * ^ ./V V'- J * •- *. - I'.'.v.*" ^ • ■ ■ ■- ••*... »•.. t ■ ■ ’ .••.•“• •' •- -• ;*4 ** * ' * •' V • - .■ * .■ '.'C *v - ■.•►A'*’ 'v ’■ ’ •^- '■■-* *«“'•'’■>.*>/,' • J.-I :. •.... ‘u* \ . ,* ; .V*" •* **• • ' 'k.• • *• *'»■:* ,* ^ •• ,i* • • » -.* • ^ *1,^ •- •.•» .r*..»DATECITYOFORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO------------- CALLED INSCHEDULED COMPLETED TIME ADDRESS OWNER ^eC-^A ^£lI<i/uaJcY___CONTR. TELEPHONE NO---------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION. 01 FOOTING 02 framing 03 INSULATION 04 WALL BD 05 FINAL 07 DEMO-SITE 07 DEMO—FINAL 09 PLUMBING Rl 10 PLUMBING FINAL ^ OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: O ct U j O. 11 MECHANICAL Rl 11 MECHANICAL FINAL 24/25 WOOD BURNER FlREPLAC* 12 WATER HOOK UP laMETERSETaURNON 14 SEWER HOOK UP 27 SEPTIC MAIN! 15 SEPTIC INSTALL 23 SEPTIC final _ YES__NO 16 WELL TEST PUMP 18 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING 19 LAKESHOREANETLANDS 34 TREE REMOVAL 17 SITE INSPECTION 06 PROGRESS 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOLLOW UP COMMENTS: <0o{)Le^t. —P^C/1 4- ^paa 4t^1 /r^a^ tv I e^rawcp. i > c*V ( wonr;sATisF;.CTOf*.Y pp.oa rn L] CORRECT WORK & PROCEED r; CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING .: CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN : PFTOJECT COMPLETE E. ISSUE CERIiriCATE OF OCCUPANCY _________TEMPORARY _____PERMANENT HOUF^S photo TAKEN r CITATION ISSUED STOP ORDER POSTED CALL INSPECTOR i: INSPECTION REQUIRED CAl L TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call (or the next inspection 24 hours in advance. 473-7357 Owner/Contractor on site:__________________________________ Inspector.----------------------------------------------------------------------------- White Copy/lnspeclof s File Canary Copy/Silt Notice September 9, 1993 City of Crono Attn: City Council 2780 Kelley Parkway Crono, MN Dear Council Members, I am unable to attend the council meeting on Sept. 23, so I am sending you my comments on item 7, #1860, Zelma McKinney 3599 Livingston Ave. I have been living in this neighborhood for the last 13 years. I know that Zelma has been renting out part of her home for a number of years. The gails that she has had living there have been personable, quiet» and have helped her keep her home clean and well taken care of. We have not had any problems with her tennants in the past. I know that Zelma is planning to put her home up for sale in the near future. My concern in allowing this to be sold as a duplex is that there is a 3rd appartment in the house, and that an investor will purchase this home, and have three tennants living there. With having multiple tennants living next door to you, you do not know how long they will live there, how much traffic will be in and out of there, will the property be maintained, is there adequate parking for all of the people that live there? (Livingston ave is a very narrow street and this house in on a corner lot. There is no room to park safely on the street) I have moved into my home to get away from the appartment type of life style. Wc have a nice neighborhood now. Everyone keeps up there homes and yards for the most part. The neighborhood is quiet, there is not alot of traffic, and no one has large loud parties. Please keep this in mind in making your decision. V.’e would prefer this to be a single family home for a future buyer. Sincerely Karen Cuff 3572 Livingston Ave Crono, MN 55391 P.S. It is my understanding that the city is recommending this to be re-zoned as a owner occupied duplex with one tennant. I do not feel that the neighborhood should be the only ones policing the conformance of this property. I To: From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator September 9, 1993 #1861 Jeffrey S. Leech, 720 North Arm Drive - Variances - Public Hearing Applicant proposes the installation of a new foundation under the existing detached garage within the street yard of the lakeshore lot. The existing garage is located w'ithin substandard street and side setbacks. There are excesses of hardcover on the property. The following ordinances are pertinent to the review: 1. Section 10.03, Subd. 13 - In the case of garages where doors face street, the required setback is 30’ from the street lot line. Required = Existing = Proposed Variance 30’ r 7" = r 7" = 28 ’ 3" or 83% Section 10.03, Subd. 15 (F) - Side yard setback for acce.ssory structures Required = Existing = Proposed Variance 10’ r 8" = r 8" = 8’ 2" or 82% 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75 ’ .setb.ick area - 3,650 s.f. Existing = 951 s.f. or 26% Proposed = 951 s.f. or 26% No reductions ■ .ardcover proposed within the 0-75 ’ setback area 75-250 ’ setback area = 4,360 s.f. Existing = 2,385 s.f. or 55% Proposed = 2,381 s.f. or 54 6% Zoning File # 1861 September 9, 1993 Pace 2 4.Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Lot coverage. (Review of structural hardcover on property.) Total lot area = 8,010 -.f. Allowed = 1,201.5 s.f. or 15% Existing = 1,969 s.f. (includes areas of decks with railings) or 24.5% Proposed = 8,859 s.f. or 23.2% Excessive lot coverage = 657.5 s.f. or 8.2% Reduction in lot coverage = 110 s.f. or 1.3% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Hardcover Worksheets - 0-75’ and 75-250’ setback areas F - Detail of Hardcover Removals and Additions within 75-250’ setback area G - Plan of Hardcov'^r Improvements H - New Site Plan I - Elevations of Existing Structure Description of Request The applicant proposes the replacement of failing foundation under existing detached garage. Applicant proposes the removal of the shed to the rear of the garage structure and the addition of a door with a stoop and steps leading to paved walkway. Structure is located less than 2’ from the side and rear yards. Review Exhibit G, structure is located 29’ from the traveled roadway. Applicant’s contractor was asked to consider facing doors away from street with the new constniction but because of topography. 40’ ioi width and a shared drive, the backout area to side could not function without endiroaching ncighboi’c property. The lot is severely limited in width and area. The street ya'd provides the only leve; grassed yard area as lakeshore yard is sloped. Based on the structural condition of foundation, it has probably been years since the structure has been in use. Please review the location of the structure, the surrounding topography and shared use of the driveway to determine if there is any other feasible way to relocate garage ensuring safer use. Zoning File ^1861 September 9, 1993 Page 3 Statement of Hardship Please review Exhibit A. Staff would add the following hardship: Limited lot area and lot width. The garage is located in an area where lot measures only 40’ and impossible to meet setbacks and provide turnaround on site. The property was developed in the 40’s prior to any zoning standards. Although structure is located less than 2 ’ from street lot line, actual distance to street is 29’ to the north and 35 ’ to the south. Issues for Consideration 1. 2. What comments do you have concerning a relocation of detached garage? Consider: width - 40’ lot width, lot, topography, shared drive, other improvements. Should City recommend improvements that would make structure more permanent? Lot coverage has been reduced by 1.3% remaining at 23.2% where 15% is allowed. Hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback area has been reduced from 55% to 54.6%. Hardcover remains the same in the 0-75 ’ setback area. Plea.se review Exhibits E, F. G and H. Applicant ’s representative has provided excellent hardcover detail for Planning Commission consideration. Are there other hardcover improvements that could be considered for removal? 3. Can setbacks be improved on the 40’ wide lot? - ..r,,-------- CITY OF ORONO - VAf.IANCE APPLICATION #1 i n t ^ • Imm ■ '■ ' W L. i < ^ . L. Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) /9/,-y/7-^.7 ^'^000¥ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Properly Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do)^;^ notX? also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ^ residential _ _ _other(specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Phone (home) ^ 'lO -/r ^ 9' / _ Name S, LttcH______________ Phone (work) 1(^3-130^ AddiVessiyjn AJ. D R. City; OKO AJ O Zip: 5X56 *7_ 'v* m' OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address:City:Zip; DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; /6 //^^/<* •*- -po aof^<\c<y*o<* ^K<(c( /-InoK I o h<\ck *■>> I ~fA s hf s---------------------------------------------------------—------------------------ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ Lot Width Front Side Hardcover _ _Lot Coverage Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:_ _ _ _ _ ' ' ' LtJiI ^<f Co <(eLqc/<; n/Ti In c( 4-t> ^ ^ ^^r/ru^J< (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. 2. Completed Application Form _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271) 3. _Plat Map (oDta^ed with ^property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 855"xll" for reproduction). 5. _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8*5"xll"). 6. _SJcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the informcttion supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby aclcowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all^bmittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Q QQ.c •IVRUN DATE OS/20/9SO BATCH 001PROP AODR 0»tlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 38 06-117-23 32 0002 00A05 NORTH ARM OR LAKEVIEH GOLF OF HTKA INC LAKEVIEH GOLF OF MTKA INC 855 RED OAK LANE MOUND MN 55366 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»«IERS LIST38 06-117-23 63 000200680 NORTH ARM OR RICHARD 0 HOLLANDER RICHARD 0 HOLLANDER 2906 HUTBOLOT AVE S MPLS MN 55608 REPORT NO. PI635601 PAGE 158 06-117-23 63 000300700 NORTH ARM OR GREGORY M HARTY GREGORY M HARTY 700 NORTH ARM DR HOUND M(4 55366 1 '.V:r - C L . t: PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR (■ y 38 06-117-23 63 0006 00720 NORTH ARM DR J S LEECH AVE LAIS-LEECH J S LEECH AVE LAIS-LEECH 720 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55366 TOTAL BATCH 001 00006 38 06-117-23 63 0005 00710 NORTH ARM DR JERRY 0 OLSON ETAL JERRY 0 OLSON 710 NO ARM DR MOUND TW 55366 38 06-117-23 63 0006 00760 NORTH ARM DR E G EINAR HAGOERG ET AL H/LE E 6 HAGOERG 760 NO ARM DR HOUND MN 55366 ! * i i * < i. c 1.V I V. p t . I I 1 ■i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RZPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HETWEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TOvTHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF^ DATE‘S ( •; ■ ' H ■ ■■ 4. X' i (• 4 ' •. '•/ ^ V» . V. . *y . .-y.V ■■ .\- ■' ' ^•i C>•*». • I/••. • *.W»: -4 . '• •■it'. ..»-’rt-:^ .r,'jjk.; •’^. - ■.*.^ » Jv '!*. • :^vSt*: ^ • »'Iff - V • vT-f • •-' • % V »#<•.- • •?v■■««■¥#;. . rv::v 'i; -h #v-3'\* •*j » •..■ -'ni, « >•'}. . ‘.. V;.• ■ • rltf •'. •.- •• .* >♦ •'> * *ij ** *7 >;/,• i ••, v'-" '’•• -■ .4’.' ••■! ■ ■'♦ ■ :*■'..1. ;. r, . •.i.'j.....ixtj ;\% O' %\ •• -'jP.-*'• •■'So**/:' ^r-*;• • ., • ••r * ’. ** *'./.*V 'i ^ ••, •t- ; ,r>: : .•. •• •;'.s.-1 .•.IVVIi,;' %<:9 V \ ?^fe2 ‘ 'I et3S71 Certificate of Survey for Jeffrey S. Leech Virginia L. Lais-Leech in Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 362 ^ Hennepin County, Minnesota 1t , 4 i l!..,5 'u- A Lake M\KlUtTOMVCAs \8 Co»'lieV -CowWs 0V» stoHC r This survey shows the location of all existing buildings on the ab.ove .. described property. It does not pur­ port to show any other improvements or encroachments. For purposes of this survey, the boundaries are based on the original staking of the Auditor's Subdivision lots. Existing Legal Description That part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdiviion Number 362, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of a straight line drawn through 2 points, ex­ tending Northeasterly to the water lino, 1 point being in tne Southwesterly line of said Lot 3, 40 feet Southerly, along said line, from the most Westerly corner of said Lot, the other point being 50 feet distant at right angles Southeasterly from the Northwesterly line of said Lot, measured from a point in the North­ westerly line of said Lot distant 172.6 feet Northeasterly measured along said line from the most Westerly corner of Lot, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County. o: Iron marker Bearings shown are based on an assumed datum. CoiTiN & Gronberg, Inc. .1. \l\ "V- I hereby certify that this 5ur\ey was prepaied by me ur under my direct super­ vision, and that 1 am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws (>f the State (d Minnesota Mark 5. Gronberg Minnesota License Numl-K?r 12753' iMii: e> • • 9 5 6 ----------------------------------------------j SOM I 1 - 2?D : ion NO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ohe) 75-250' 250-500' 500-10C0' Existing Hardcover in Zone YA •House LENGTH WIDTH 339 S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. <3' S.F. HARDCOVER U lCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75250-500' Existing H ardcover in Zone 5Q0-IGG0' A^^S / UN6£f^IN BY y PLA^IC S^£1\nG ^H5r> S'TC)^;£ \jU/ttV G. O ther • • A. House 9,2.X M.O 129 S.F.Cii) ' • • LENGTH IS. 5 X WIDTH 4 ■ e^4 S 1 r • X S.F. m •X S.F. X S.F. 3.Garage -20.3 X '2.0.'?4ZO S.F.(IS) c.Driveway G , X 2 0.’!24 S.F.0 t ^ • V «■» t • # « # S'4(c.^J'x I'b. 1 non S. F • (zj) '7? 0 0.. • • S idewalk CA X '2-^ 4v?6 =\60 S.F.(23) X 22, .4- =5 22... S.F.<0 u.r,X 5.47 =5‘5»S . r • Cis) E.^ AT I (>/■ 3ec:< X 4.0 V = ./ 3 S.F. (ST) F.^ANDSCAI^E 44 X J ff -X 4,S.F.<S) X X S.F. S.F. /O X //I/O S.F. //// I S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total P.roperty A rea in Zone S.F. ^ S.F.B 2 3 *35" - fTl 43^0 X IQO = 6"5~ % % . f { »l«l> .a iOiMligdli] I ♦ 1' I. HARDCOVER UlCULATION liORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (/5-250^ 250-5C0' 50Q-1C00' E xisting Hardcover in Zone to A. House 3. Garage c. D riveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ DECK F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY : . PLASTIC SHEETING G. O ther LENGTH X _ X 21. S 5.^ X X X X lo t 1 O SbacAt Hardcover in Zone •pa 'ese Total Property A rea in Zone X 100 r }S.F. WIDTH s •S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Si?. •S.F. • S.F. ^2.1-S r=;So S.F. 2.4-S.F. ( 4n<'l<=> S.F. J •S.F. s S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ,F. di) S.F. S.F.B oyVo ■ »>y. ■><y^ —:: •. ; j • I ff M ='■N 7>H HARDCOVER CALCULATION ^lORKSHE^ AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) L.rrsTt.N^ H ardcover in zone C-75' (73^2^ :50-5Q0' "TO 'Vi SfA LLB4» 5C0-1QQ0 a . House .• X ••S.F, LENGTH WIDTH X St S • r . X S.F. • . X S.F. X S.F. 3. Garage X S.F. c. Driveway X • S.F. 14 X z = z8 S.F. D. Sidewalk 4S*X 3 S S.F. 5-5 X S.F. 9 X 4 = ?2.S.F. E. P atio / Deck 10 X 4 = . 4^S.F. F.Landscape - X . S.F. X__ X ___ NEW Total Hardcover in Zone 264 Total P roperty Area in Zone B X iOO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F . S.F.B r :oyVo i I hereby ceiilfy Ihof fhi; plan, ipcdficaliocv or report was prepared by me or under ray direct supervision and that I cm a duly Registered Professional Engineer under th« lows of the Siate of I H K / Dole ^‘**24>**\3R«g. Noi ^ ^ RUSSELL L. BRANDT CIVIL-STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BLOOMINGTON. MINN. 55431 (612)881-6808 '^'5.*2. \ViO\CA,Tet> EX\ST, BL^V/. ,^105.c( lK-D\CATeS •p^oF<»S»eai BL-«V. rVLOlCATBi WCiR>l. f’^OFBR.Ty UllsNC-i F'RCkVX *o‘B.v/ey \s>y ri/^c.vL ci F«i>n &EU<i a-2S-*V5, PhK'T\A\- S\TE. T'LAV^ -- FOE. ktCOMST'^L)CT\OH GA1^-^ciC. FOOHOATIOH B JGFF LtECW ^eSN\:>eKCe 1Z.O UO^TH A?-M WIU£^ OR.ONO, fAN' DAT^_8i^^ ^3 3‘^S-'L mr .'TTKm.n wrr (ICp , • H• • A >Ni * i* ^ v' >^~ 3(>- .w•.^5^22' •.»•» . . .^.'Vi • t *%' ' ............ ■ F r. , ’ » . ’ -l5l_l^ _ _ .' 1 1 iir^i. 1 ^ f ■» F- - ^ (PI * " mm ™ I *'. ' — MM ?1'H ' i!i I ',a I t *( > <M J> I To: From: Date: Subject: /3 Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator September 7, 1993 #1863 Robert Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle - Amended Variance Application Public Hearing In December of 1992, the applicant received approval of multiple variances for a 15’ x 16 W two-story lakeside addition, a 28 ’ x 22’ garage addition to the existing detached accessory structure and a 6’ x 8 ’ greenhouse addition at the southeast corner. Variances involved setbacks to the average lakeshore setback line, lot coverage, hardc«)ver excesses in the 75-250’ setback area and side and street setback variances for garage addition. The applicant was to remove an approximate 8 x 24 ’ grade level deck to the north side of the principal strucmre and to replace with a 4 ’ x 12’ entry deck. One of the conditions of that approval required that an updated survey be provided locating all existing and proposed strucmres confirming setbacks at the time the building permit application is filed. The updated survey confirmed that existing detached structure was not located 3’ from the side lot line but 2’ 4". An amended variance application has been required as applicant did not wish to offset addition 8" to the south of street side of detached structure. New dimensional information of existing structures will also require an adjustment in the final total of area for oversized accessory strucmre. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (C) (2). Variance to allowed lot area for an oversized accessory structure. Allowed = 1,000 s.f. Approved with original variance application (#1775) Amended proposal = 1,288.35 s.f. Variance = 288.35 s.f. or 28.8% = 1,273 s.f 2. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (D). Side setback variance for oversized accessory structure Required = 30’ Proposed with original application Proposed with amended proposal = Variance = 27’ 8" or 92.6% = 3’ 2’ 4" List of Exhibits A - Application A-1- Applicant’s Addendum B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List Zoning File /!^1863 September 7, 1993 Page 2 D - Original Survey by Arleigh C. Smith E - Updated Survey by Coffin & Gronberg F - Resolution No. 3313 Approving Application #1775 G - Original Plan H - Plan Approved by Council at December 1992 Meeting Description of Request Applicant does not wish to adjust structure to the originally approved 3’ setback and has filed an amended variance application. The facts for the area of the oversized structure have also been amended as noted above. The structure will now be placed 2’ 4" from the side lot line. As structure will be located 3’ or less from the lot line, special fire wall construction will be required as with the original application. Applicant has received a building permit for the grtc^hoMse addition at the southeast comer of the existing shed and that addition will now be 7.6’ X 5.8 ’ rather than 6’ x 8’ which was originally approved. For more detail on the variances approved with the original application review pages I and 2 of approval resolution. Exhibit F. Staff has not adjusted the hardcover facts per the original approval resolution, as entry addition at north side of residence is shown at 4’ x 5 ’ and not 4’ x 12’ as originally approved. This reduction in proposed hardcover will offset addition of 15.3 s.f. of oversized accessory structure. Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A-1 and the approval resolution. Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Will the additional 8" encroa ...nent have any further impact on property owner to north side? Should we receive . i updated response from property owner concerning amended proposal? 2. Exclusive of architectural or aesthetic consideration, would the 8”' extension to south have an impact on other improvements excluding impaci on trees as noted by applicant? 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Anv recommendation ot approval must include notice to the owner, as in the original approval, that fire wall construction will be required along the north side of the addition as structure will be located 3’ or less from lot line. The original approval resolution did not provide a deadline for the removal of existing hardcover. Staff would recommend that the updated approval include the condition that hardcover removals be completed prior to the foofing inspection for the new construction of the accessory structure addition and lakeside addition. It should also be noted that the pitch of detached structure's roof shall not exceed a 4'/^ - 12 pitch. , h 1 / - -v CITY OF ORONO - VARIAKCE APPLICATION^' / U t» I i *1* Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50,00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) A PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 324^ CASCO CIRCLE Property Identif. Number 38 Attach legal description to application if not included cn required survey. i-OT /z. 5fP/ZiNCt FAR.k. Date Property Acquired SOMwre. /9^3 _ _ _(momch/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District: LF-1C S/Mftte PAmily LAkESKoKC- APPLICANT Name Phone (home) 92.1^ Address:. CA^CC> CIRCLE.City: Phone (wor)c) OF.ONO 6»73- Zip:^^39/ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zip: Estimated Construction Cost $DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST J *. 1 Ke.vt^£ Y arp ^e.T3AC\e. Poc. F-fZOP{Describe request in detail: ________________________________________1 3* 4r:> 2.4^' Th ^A7Cf{ YAR.P O/^ ^X/iT/Z/di AccB^.'ioK.Y BOfcP/t/Ot.__________ VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ Lot Area Setbac)c: Lot Width Front X Side Hardcover Rear \ Lot* ;;''**erage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardshio or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requiloments : lZ.B<aoe.^r Z ‘ si»£YAKJ> foK. A/eu <TrAZA<ue c>h sc^A!«/gr ~CoMPLtAHCB vy/r/r 3* stpe. yak.p wqulp jze^oLT tY a 7 /kch opPSBTALOA/a THE north WA/.4 VViYggA THE NEXY WfLU ATTACH ----------- Ai ^ ^ ^5*/} t ^ f G • .......... —— (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be sxibmitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. ^ Completed Application Form 2. _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. y Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction).• 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8J5"xll"). 6. _S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8is"xll"). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been i^.icluded. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her >cnowledge. Applicant's Signature •ect to the best ^ Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. r V L - f/<J Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meeting’^' of the Planning Commission cind Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. #1 /•* ; . - )\i^~ AUG ^ ® li Variance Application R. G. Luesse - 3249 Casco Circle ,-3 The variance for a new garage, approved on December 14, 1992, contains the following finding: The proposed garage addition to the accessory structure shall not encroach further into the side yard than the existing structure at 3’. My previous request, and your approval, was based on a property surv^ey which showed the existing accessory structure to have a 3' side yard. A new survey reveals that the accessory structure has a 2.4’ side yard. To comply with a 3' side yard would result in a 7 inch offset along the north wail of the two buildings, and would cause the new garage and walk to be that much closer to mature plantings, including a 9 "Birch tree. Since 1 believe the variance approval intended to require that the side yard be the same as the existing accessory building, I hereby request the variance approval be revised to read: The proposed garage addition to the accessory structure shall not encroach further into the side yard than the existing structure at 2.4'. Copies of the original and new survey are enclosed for your review. Sincerely. ** / • 90 n60 N?0 •> *c •' 50.L yji(Sy//^X<lS?£V/J^'y////<<: ‘y y 1 ‘* -1 ' 1 1 . “•• • .V • '* * «• • • *-*• • - > -• •••.•* ■ r ♦ .• c.* .**. •«• .• ••s . • •^:- • • • V—*•;*'* • • •• ^ fc. , ..4 • - *1 -'/.*• •• • .•• • •*• • •- 'r~* .*•.* *. *../ - :• • * •. *-->•.••.• .• . ». •■ • ••.*.• • Vfc •«• • • . • \ .; -. :•*■-%• V..*V .; •■.••>-;.•• • Vv-*;r-."*1 •■•*.•• '4^ “'•-***\i“ “ -------- - RUN OAtt Q'i/Zl/9t BATCH 005'PROP ADDRomER nameTAXPAYERNAME/AODR PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 20-117-25 005105486 IVY PL6 L MILIIREN SSL HIUIRENGUY L MILLIREN5486 IVY PLHAYZATA 55591 58 20-117-25 45 0008 05249 CASCO CIR R G LUESSE ETAL ROBERT LUESSE CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MH 55391 58 20-117-21' 45 0015 7^ 05255 ._CA^O CIR 0 M SPRSMII.A P 0 SPILSETH OAVIO H ^PILSE 5255 CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA IM 55391 33. 20-117-23 42 0015 3271 CASCO CIR PATRICK J NEUVILLE PATRICK J NEUVILLE 3271 CASCO CIR WAYZATA I1N 55391 HEKiEPlH COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATIOM SY5UM PKOPLRTY OJOIERS LIST38 20-117-25 45 000603466 IVY PL E f GARNER ETAL E F GARNER 3466 IVY PL HAYZATA m 55391 30 20-117-23-43 0009 03247 CASCO CIR KURT CARLSON A WIFE KURT A LUCILLE CARLSON 3247 CASCO CIR HAYZATA UN 55391 / 38 20-117-25 43 0031 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED THE CASCO CO ' THE CASCO COMPANY RCOERT 0 MACNIE 3135 CASCO CIR HAYZATA MN 55391 KL*UKT NO. P1435401 PAGE 0/ 30 20-117-23 43 000703251 CASCO CIR JOHN R OIEGRE ETAL JOHN R OIEGRE 3251 CASCO CIR HAYZATA rSl 55391 30 20-117-25 43 0010 03243 CASCO CIR JAMES H RICHARDS A HIFE JAMES H RICHARDS 5243 CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA MN 55591 * TOTAL BATCH 005 00008 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF lt4F0RMATI0N AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COlPITY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. G DATE -.■'I e .r* r. .V• i. 9/;'i)i-R-^ fhlOi <L. f' o • > L.. f; Vc/ c G o o V:J (3 ^ . —• . • • .-s#- • •* $461 $ « I- r CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ROBERT LUESSE OF LOT 12. SPRING PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA % ^ f) Oj O O l.oqal Description (from owner) / I.ot 12, S[)iing Park, also all that part of vacated hake Shore Avenue and of I he tract of larid lying between said vacated avenue and shoie of lake which lies h«*twoc?n tlio easterly extensions of the northerly and southerly lines of .aid I.ot 12. ... *rhis survey sliow.s the location of all existing buildings and a proposed addit. ion on the above described property. It does not purport to sliow any other improvements or encroachments. •: lion marker found >: Iron marker set fe» nj \\\ C')||1\ & Gkumjcrg, Isc. Nfi' f • I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supv vision, and that 1 am a duly registered Civil Ftlgineer aad Land Sur\eyor under the laws of th»* S»ite of Minnesota DATE 1 SCALE 1 * « 30' 1 Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 1 1755 JOB NO 13-273 1 wjiM • n 1 .,4 > I'-' r CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3213 A RESOLDTION GRANTING VARIAN'^S TO MUNICIPAL ZL «ING CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (C-2), SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (D), SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C), SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 PILE #1775 WHEREAS, Robert G. Luesse (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3249 Casco Circle within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 12, Spring Par)c, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for the following variances to the Municipal Zoning Code to permit a 22'x28' addition to a detached accessory structure, a two story 15'xl6 1/2* addition to the lakeside of the existing residence and 6'x8' greenhouse addition to an existing accessory structure as follov/s: 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (D) - setback variances for oversized accessory structure. Street setback is proposed at 19' instead of the required 30' and 3' from the side lot line where 30' is required. 2.Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C-2) - variance to allowed area for an oversized accessory structure. The applicant proposes a 1,273 s.f. accessory structure where only a 1,000 s.f. structure is allowed. 3.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - proposed structural improvements will require a lot coverage variance. Applicant proposes 2,604.5 s.f. or 16.3% where only 2,384 s.f. or 15% structural coverage is allowed. 4.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - an average lakeshore setback variance is required for a lakeside addition that will encroach approximately 15' in front of average lakeshore setback line. Page 1 of 5 ' t o >4 h/f CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3213 Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area is required as hardcover is proposed at 3,386 s.f. or 30.2% where only 2,800 s.f. or 25% is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, 1. 2. 3. 4. L_ FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1775 The property is located in the LR-IC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a 1/2 acre or 21,780 s.f. in area. The property consists of approximately 15,893 s.f. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 19, 1992 and November 16, 1992 and recommended approval of the proposed variances as amended based upon the following findings: a)The proposed garage addition to the accessory structure shall not encroach fu.tther into the side yard than the existing structure £<t 3'. b) c) There is no adjacent land available to acquire. The location of the garage structure in tho street yard, proposed 19' from street lot line, is consistent with other detached garages within immediate Casco Circle neighborhood. The two story lakeside addition will be placed 5* further into average lakeshore setback area as an existing roofed second floor porch structure is located 10' beyond average lakeshore setback line. The City Council find.s that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely af/ect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard c.. other danger to neighboring property? would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to Page 2 of 5 A 4 jM. r o. o\CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3213_ _ _ _ _ preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5,The City Council has considered this application including the findings and reconunendations of the Planning Conunissionr reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Sections noted above that would permit the construction of a 28 x22 garage and 6'x8* greenhouse additions to detached accessory structure referenced as workshop and a two story 15'xl6 1/2' lakeside addition to the principal residence, subject to the following conditions: 1.Uoon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide an updated survey locating all existing structures and proposed structures on property. 2.Applicant shall remove an 8 l/2'x24' grade level deck to the north side of the principal structure and replace with a 4'xl2' grade level deck. 3.All new construction shall be subject to requirements of uniform building code and fire code. 4.The new roof to be installed over workshop/garage structure shall be constructed so as net to exceed a 4 1/2 to 12 pitch. 5.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not v'ith the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 14, 1993). Page 3 of 5 Ifcfil I CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3213 6.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code/ shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein/ and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7.The undersigned applicant has read/ understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirS/ successors and assigns/ hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of December/ 1992. ATTES T: / tallin/ City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson/ Mayor Property Owner(s)iJ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUUTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of December, 1992/ by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin/ Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. CAROLE A. HASEMAN NOTARY PUmX-llf#lC90TA V •/ HENNEPIN COUNTY * •* • r.XPlPZZ 0-23-C3 J /7. Notary Public y Page 4 of 5 \ r 1 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3213________ )STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. On this ^(9 day of CTgr 199 3 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared Robert- Uu^ ^od- known to me to be the person!s) de^scribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. L1SD,\ s. \'EE NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA li HENNEPIN COUNTY My conrr.isslon expires 8-12-96 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 199 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 / 'Ll TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building A Zoning Administrator September 15, 1993 SUBJECT: 4^1864 Irwin Jacobs, 1700 Shoreline Drive - Conditional Use Perm it/Variances Public Hearing Zoning District LR-IA - Area Total acreage = 33 acres (24 acres dry) In October of 1990, applicant applied for a conditional use permit for a new guest house, refer to Exhibit H. The application also involved a variance as guest house was over 1,000 s.f. and considered an accessory structure requiring variance approval for both having more than one oversized accessory structure and a variance to the total allowed area for accessory struemres on a property with 9+ acres. In December of 1990, applicant applied once again for a variance application to allow construction of a greenhouse on an adjacent contiguous property at 2.7 acres also owned by applicant. The greenhouse was 2,604 s.f. in area Variances involved the addition of two oversized accessory structures as property also contained a 1,414 s.f. detached garage. Variances were again approved. The condition of that approval requirec that the 2.7 acre parcel be combined with Mr. Jacobs ’ homestead parcel to west. The current application involves a conditional use permit for a new caretaker resid'^nce to replace an older caretaker residence on the original 2.7 acre parcel. The applications also deal with variances to the allowed number of oversized accessory structures for a property now at a total of six and also to the allowed total area for accessor)' structures on a given property. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: Section 10.27. Subdivision 3 - Conditional use permit is required for guest/caretaker house. Existing 1.437.8 s.f. structure is to be removed and replaced with a 1,088 s.f. caretaker house. Section 10.03 - Definitions 1. 28. Accessor)' use structure. Subordinate to and serving the principal use or struemre on the same lot and customarily incidental thereto. Guesthouse. An accessory separate dwelling constructed on an existing undivided lot for the sole use of the occupants, including their domestic employees or their nonpaying guests, other primary dwelling. All regu.ar lot requirements shall be met bv the guesthouse. r Zoning File #1864 September 15, 1993 Page 2 73.Use conditional. Those . . . uses specifically designated in each zoning use district, which for their respective conduct e.xercise, perfonnance in such designated use districts may require reasonable but special, peculiar, unusual or extraordinary limitations, facilities, regulations in such use district for the promotion of or preservation of the general public welfare, health or safety therein, and in this city and therefore maybe permitted in such use district only by a conditional use permit, which is designed to meet tlie problem that arises with certain uses, although generally compatible with the basic use classification of a particular zone, should not be permitted to be located at a mauer of right in every area included • ithin the zone becau.se of hazards inherent in the use itself or special problems which its proposed location may represent. 75.Use principal. The main use of land or buildings as distinguished from subordinate or accessory uses. A principal use may be either permitted or conditional. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) - Accessory' buildings height restrictions. No accessory building in the R District shall exceed the height of the principal building, nor shall an accessory building exceed 30 ’ in height. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) - Area restrictions. In all R Districts no accessoiy buildings shall exceed 1,000 s.f. of footprint area except that accessory structures in excess of 1,000 s.f. will be allowed under the following conditions: A.Not more than one oversized accessory structure shall be permitted on any property. An oversized accessory structure is defined as an accessory structure of footprint area in excess of 1,000 s.f. Six oversized accessory structures exist on the property and on proposed to remain at six under the current application as follows: 1,414 s.f. detached garage 2,604 s.f. greenhouse (approved 12/90) 637 s.f. shed 216 s.f. kennel 1,081 s.f. detached garage 1,844 s.f. caretaker house 1,749 s.f. guesthouse (approved 10/90) 1,088 s.f. caretaker house proposed in current application (existing 1,437.8 s.f.) Zoning File #1864 September 15, 1993 Page 3 B.Oversized accessory structures are regulated by the following table: Lot area - 9 acres or more. Maximum allowed footprint - 3,000 Total area of accessory structures on a property - 6,000 Allowed = 6,000 s.f. Existing = 10,982.8 s.f. Proposed = 10,633 s.f. Variance = 4,633 s.f. or 11% Reduction of 349.8 s.f. or 5.8% Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) 1.Tanager Lake is considered a Recreational Development lake requiring a 100 ’ setback for all structures Required - 100 ’ Existing = 50’ Proposed = 100 No structural variance required Note: grade level patio is located 90’ from lakeshore within the 75-100’ setback area. Hardcover improvements are allowed as long as they are not structural. Grade level patio is allowed at 90’. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 75-250’ setback area = 224,000 s.f. Existing = 6,090 s.f. or 2.72% Proposed = 5,649 s.f. or 2.52% LIST OF EXHIBITS A - Application B - Plat Map C - I’roperty Owners List D - Hardcover Fact Sheets 75-250’ Setback Area E - Weekman Memo F - Resolution #2897 - Applica'ion #1598 G - Resolution #2907 - Application #1603 II - Survey of Guesihouse tor .'\pplication #1598 I - Flooi Plans J - Elevations K - .Sarvey Zoning File #1864 September 15, 1993 Page 4 Description of Request The applicant proposes the complete reconstruction of a new caretaker residence to replace existing structure built in the ’40s originally as a lakeshore cabin. Struemre is located approximately 50 ’ from the shoreline. The new structure will be located 100 ’. Note grade level patio is allowed within 75-100 ’ of the shoreline of Tanager Lake. 24 acres of dry buildable area will support four residential units on property (zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres per one residential unit). Footprint of the new ca-etaker unit is reduced by 350 s.f. Access to this property can be gained from Millston Road just to the east of the Jacob’s driveway. Access can al.so be gained from the Jacob’s property at the most northern garage. Review Exhibit E, Weekman notes that the existing septic system that serves the residence is very old and there is no record of a permit ever being issued for the installation ot the system. It will be necessary to provide new septic testing for both principal and alternate sites upon application for the building permit. There will be a reduction of some 360 s.f. of total accessory structures on the property with the construction of the new caretaker house. Although there is a reduction, it will be necessary to address new variances as we are dealing with new construction. Issues for Consideration 1. The ordinance dealing with oversized accessory structures does not consider or address special needs of an estate use. Should there be limits on the number of oversized accessory struemres? Note that the conditional use permit for guesthouse or caretaker use requires that stn-ctures be located so that appropriate area and setbacks are met to satisfy standards of zoning district in case of fuuire subdivision. Other nonhabital accessory struemres are controlled by the specific covenants set forth in the code in the case of future subdivision. 2. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Planning Commission Members may refer to the former approval resolutions for the statement of hardship and unique findings. The following conditions are recommended by staff: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for providing septic testing for a principal and alternate seotic treatment area to ser\e the new residence. As with all conditional use permits dealing with guesthouse or caretaker use, your approval must include the disclaimer that the unit can never be used for rental purposes while the parcel is still legally con.bined with the larger homestead parcel. 2. ^ / 0^ y CITY O? CROMO ** GENiliiAL I»A*1D USE APPLICATION — — ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ^ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address HCO Hnc^ Prt^ l ; ' 4 «✓*-* \ < -t k\. J W '• ' f Property Identification Nimber (P.I.D.) /^- //7 " Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ applicant Name J^n ><5 n Ham g- S -J* /><> OWNER Uf different than applicant) Name 2^a ia/1 n Jco^b^_ _ _ _ _ _ Address // /> <s- Phone (wor)c)¥7^ City mka ziD s:s3o^ Phone (home) Phone A.3 7-/ City H)rano ziD ?=• Adjacent parcel—f pees - conditional use permits - $ 50.00 each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) j/ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments (jlare. ia lea Hi _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use * •I » . $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling “• 101 cu. yd. or more lakeshore - - Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lalceshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) M?«-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee ;THER APPLICATIONS $200.00 - - - - $250.00 -- - - - $175.00 $ 75.00 - - - - $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation 4,j_„ Easement Vacation with Subdivision letoSing (POD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule - l«T^ .*•-'L-f t PRESclii'l' USii Oy PROPSKTi Present Zoning District LR-!k Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DBGCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: / g/C ne. ^ n of f C. m o \/ f=>_ _ _ _o lai _$V r tJr-.4^ <> rA.. • . - . ^JEQDIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified p'roperty Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtad this list from Rennenin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contoqrs) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements), rts an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. c^ • i • YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of aLa/hex knowledge. DateApplicant's signature OWHERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature g- ^ ^ ^Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present *at al'l‘Scheduled review meetings of the Plzuining Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. • '. MLX5-2b-l‘?93 10:41 FROM JACOBS MANAGEMENT CCF.P Present Zoning District ___________ Present: Use of Prof-orty / / Residential ' Other (specify)_n DESCRIPTJON OP REQUEST Describe request in detail: 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obta this list front Hennepin County Department of Finance A-60J Governme Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (oxisti'.ig and proposed contoiirs) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF TARGE DOCUMENTS OR - A WORKING COPY (ll* X IT* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED .'he applicant and Property Owner must s*ign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has net been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE . ^ The owner hereby acknov/ledgcs and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable f^ehtr-y cn^ t^")property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission 'mexnbe'rsX ^dl/Council members for purposes of investigation and veririca-tiop^ijf/this/requost. Owner's signature _____________ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building * Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ..... ^ ?‘VI RUN DATE od/ia/n BATCH 005 KEfflEPIH COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Ot^RS LISTCMCR NAME TAXPAYER . NAME/AOORr-:: ?a io-iir-2S 11 (noiOOOSB ADDRESS UTUSSIGNEOSUAO H AZHARlSUAO N AZHAPI 17^5 FOX ST NAYZATA m 55S91 T-' 1- PROP ADOR C»t€R NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SB 10-117-23 12 0004 009B0 BR0»#4 RO S A I C JOHNSTON ALEXANOER/CATHERINE JOHNSTOti 940 BROItl RD S NAYZATA m 55391 r (’ 2 PROP AODR IPtlER NAME 5 TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR i SB 10-117-23 13 0008 01025 »€RITAGE LA N J JOHNSON a H t JOHNSON HARK R J3HNS0N 1025 HERITAGE LN NAYZATA m 55391 PROP AOOR OMNER NAME 8 TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 38 10-117-23 14 OOOA 01125 MILLSTON RO R P BURNELL ABE BURNELL ROONEY P BURNELL 7901 XERXES AVE S HPLS MN 55431 ^ PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR j*. • -V f ' t 38 10-117-23 14 OOiO 01100 MILLSTON RD R P BURNELL SEE BURNELL RODNEY P Bt*RHELL 7901 XERXES AVE S 8201 MPLS HN 55431 ■ ift- ' addr ONNER NAME ,: TA>0>AYER ^ ; NAME/ADOR'T* V. 38 10-117-23 14 0014 01700 SHORELINE DR ZRNIN L JACOBS ET AL IRNIN L JACOBS 1700 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 55391 »• i - ?A; "V \ iVi* If 38 10-117-23 11 000200036 ADDRESS U4ASSIQiED MCLEOD CNTY REG RAlc AUTH DAKOTA RAIL I^C 25 ADAMS ST N HUTCHItCiaN m 55350 38 10-117-23 12 0005 OlfOS HERITAGE LA A DEAL DAVID J DEAL 1005 HERITAGE LA NAYZATA MT4 55391 38 10-117-23 14 0003 01780 SHORELIfiE DR DAVID M N1NT0I4 DAVID H HINTOri 4422 IDS CENTER 80 S STM ST MPLS MN 35^02 38 ^0 1x2-23 14 0006 01.050 MILLSTON RO R P BURNELL ABE BURNELL ROONEY P BURI4ELL 7901 XERXES AVE S 8201 MPLS HN 5S431 38 10-117 23 14 0011 01100 MI ASTON RO R P DURHEL. ABE BURNELL ROONEY P BJRHELL 7901 XERXES AVE S MN 55431MPIS 38 10-117-23 41 C002 00038 ADDRESS UTUSSIGNCO FOXHILL ASSN rOXHILL 7SS14 1160 her:tage la NAYZATA m 55391 -V ^ REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGF 1038 10-117-23 12 000300930 BROUr. RO S GARY 0 FRETHEIM ETAL GARY 0 FRFTHEIM 930 BROl4r4 ROAD NAYZfTA M4 !5391 38 10-117-23 13 0007 01060 HERITAGE LA DAVID M HINTON DAVID H WIKT0r4 4422 IDS CENTFR 60 S 8TH ST MPLS MN 55402 38 lC-117-23 14 0005 01000 HERITAGE LA H GUSTAFSON i L GUSTAFSON NAYNE a LINDA GUSTAFSON 1000 HERITAGE LA NAYZATA MT4 55391 38 10-117-23 14 0009 01000 MILLSTON RO R P BURNELL ABE BURNELL ROONEY P BURNELL 7^01 XERXES AVE S 8201 f^LS 55431 50 10-117-25 1<V 0012 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGICD R P OURWELL ABE BURWELL ROONEY P BUf^HELL 7901 XERXES AVE S A20l HPLS »»l SS<*51 . 1 38 10-117-23 42 0001 01190 HERITAGE LA ONEN A PARR ONEN A PARR 1190 HERRITAGE LANE NAYZATA MT4 55391 ‘ I Co 4. ^ -9 4ll" MTf oa/ia/nr?iATCH 005 ^ .MOP AMO .1 : OMEO NAK ^i'TAXPAYCO lUME/ADOO TOTAI, OATCM 1 -a ■ » 1 * *•; . * *. “A' *....... •. ' ♦■ I* ■ ■;&- iv ■ . ■•■ I * ‘t j'l.iA ■ ':' i5‘ ,vi5 'Li' ’" * • *'?!•■*«■;•:■ S ••‘•I■i.if v ,.;-^'-: r: fy*"'*> ■ .- • 4|1 - . - r \S* f ' <•.f 1^4 •4 « P # «•f'1, S',a >4 ;i: i ■'. slffc ■ W ■, ■?*• • ^ - -■ ‘ ' ‘» ^ *, '■. •■.f-;v. :• •• • •ii' • .*4 . ’ •.; Hit > •'; .'.;r ■■• f« !# V* * 4 • ^ / •. \ i) I ». ^ f: ■ 'S' ? ^ i" ® if >’'t A *.r • • t.• t. Clf» ‘^ .*1 * • HE^t4EPlN COUKTY PROPERTY INfORHATlON SYSTEM PROPERTY OmERS LIST REPORT NO. P143S401 PAGE 11 005 00016 * % I ? I •/ . ‘ 1 \ 1 iT' 4 • ^ . * / 'r- I * it ♦ i < •'•1 •’ * ’. 11. ' 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RCPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURAIt AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HErtrtPIN C01A4TY UEPARTMEtfT OF PROPERTY TAXATIONS TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEOGE ANO BELIEF. DATE 3-l^’95 BY • i % r" / ■:■! • c“ •• 14'. ' ‘ t * Y 1 \ * *•? 1 » ) .1 • 1 * F i >*■ •}■1.'4 •■ ’Tf ’ i', • ,■ { . , - -J.'v VflHW n^l <ps» i i^iiARPw on 1 Xrw»i4 .bHARDCOVER CALCULATION KORKSHEET ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' [75-25ojJ 250-500' 500-1000' ___jrrTT:r:r/iier SS4^ • s. F .* ^ Existing Hardcover in Zone A. HOUSE 3c /i. LENGTH /A 5^ 3. Garage . C$A4i^i. c. D riveway /V r S/4taJc/i0^ o^CK sraps D. bI DEWALK dr* E. ^rref.xAo^ Patio/Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY : . PLASTIC SHEETING d>l,D 2^ .»AJAU>£> G. Other _ X X X WIDTH 7.9 sp.a C.f Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone <9^ 3 ’3oo 2>Z ^7 S.F. S.F. ,• _ S.F S.F. S.F. 99o S.F. S.F.270^ S.F. 4*fo S.F. S.F. S.F. <^^24 192. s S.F. S.F. * » • » ■ •m * • *•• t .• B S.F. « 39^ • S.F.S4t - Z4 ,. S.F. • . i?09o .S/Fr T $ • it« • 22 4r S.F.s if09o B tZ9COO_ X 100 -% 6(,49 • • ( EAiffrtev i«»nMbkJ'r.«ni(^a>r^ r aWMlir . k... biim> .... .1 Mr* I #*Tm-« *1 't.TVTT/fl TPP «k-1.t n* a.1*>\ 'llialffl V.i % a _ To: From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator Stephen Weekman, On-Site Systems Manager September 13, 1993 #1864 Mr. and Mrs. Irwin Jacobs - Septic Review The applicants propose the removal of the house at 1075 Millston Ro.id and replacing it with a new residence. The septic system for the existing residence was installed ma ly years ago without a permit and therefore very little is known about the septic system. The septic system must be considered code-conforming in order to be reused for the new residence according to the requirements of the shore-land regulations As this will be a new residence, both primaiy and alternate dtainfield sites must be designated prior to the issuance of a building pcrmii. Therefore, soil testing must be completed for an ahemate drainfield site as well as confirm that the existing system meets ail current codes or a primary site must also be located. i J - aT\» OF ^OHONa City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 28Q7 A RESOLUTION ''rPING A VARIANCE rO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9(C)(1) AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 3 ■ FILE #1598 WHEREAS, Irwin L. Jacobs (hereinafter "the applicant ) is the owner of the property located at 1700 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter City ) and legally described as follows: Refer to Exhibit A attached, (hereinafter and "the property"); WHEREAS, the apolicant has made application to the City oversized accessory structure exceeding 1,000 square feet in area, would be the third oversized accessory structure on th property where only one is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1598 2 The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres m area. 3. The property is approximately 31 acres in area, 22 of which are considered dry buildable. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 15, 1990 and recommended approval of the proposed variances aid conditional use permit, based on the following findings and hardships: A) The new guest house structure will replace an existing guest house structure. Page 1 of 4 City of ORO jNO \ OF I ORONa RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2897 B) The property contains 22 plus acres of dry buildable land and can easily satisify the area needs of the guest house, existing principal structure and existing caretaker residence (2 acres per each residence equals 6 acres; 6 - 22 = 16 acres for credit of accessory structures). C) Septic testing has confirmed suitable and adequate soils for a conventional system. D) All appropriate lot standards for the LR-lA zoning district have been satisified with conditional use permit proposal for guest house. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to o^her property in this zoning district; that granting the v-rj.*i.-.ce would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring prooerties; would nut merely serve as a convenience to the*applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to the guest house will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the^property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant's representative and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO C1T>^ OFPKjM cONCLDSiur.^, ----------- . , • as the Orono ^^asea upon on. -re City council hereby grants a a%uest house, ktr^nTaif r -llouih, one is allowed. Thi .- conditions: - resolution of the city council '>897 COHC1.CSIOHS. ___ -C 4 r> . O » a. ^ - tions: ,,-ion run with the .uohoribies .-tea b^^this « pe?;;^r To -rb^e"^< .„t^-r7e:r-o^>h^ rhe quest: house _or<'5itions o..tne gu soecial cc—x- tqod. approval, or - ^o^er -x, exoire on tha^ ca —expire or. that ca e ,^^oi;.he ter.s^^^^^^^ 2. Violation o ^luticn ^i^a 11Y t^»rminate any -"^““"/onfng%-oa^. ihaU^au^^^^^^^^^^ Lnishaolc as authority grantee n.re-n, misdenieanor. - and the property. ,2„a day of City of OROrVO CITY- OF OROwa RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2897 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 5S. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd dav of O-'Tober, 1990, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy Hallin, Mayor & Cic/ Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on e a of the City. THERESA L. NAAB notary PUBUC - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My eonmnnmon M-92 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this 3'9—dav of h-c-199C before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ^ r--J^ ZJ"«a.c<gdUUedLcU —A- fT-^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -— ■■ — H ■ known to me to be the personis) described in and who executea tne foregoing instrument, and acknow1 edged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUilnlC' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ____* __, before me a Notary Public“ithin and for said County, personally appeared known to day of me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 , -.T------------Ar I r . - CtFV»- - OF OHONa City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2897 Exhibit A That part of Government Lots as^fol’ows'!’^to^wit: Beginning U7 of Range 23 which is po^rin the southeast cor­ at a l^^'‘^/,^^^i^iri''3aid°Sectxon 10; the thence running ner of said Lot m saia ^ Pound ^ ake, so-called, t..ence chains more or less. °S4herIv^shore of said Lake to along and around whe . -hore of said Lake and between the meander cornerm the Range; thence north on the Section 10 and 11 m said ^n to the southerly line section line between said ^ Brenrh of the Great Northern of the right-of-way of southerly line of said Railway thence intersection of said southerly lin'? right-of-way to the point of said Lot 1; thence oi the said right-of-way southeasterly direc- turning and running m a which is 236.S feet east tion 654.B feet, more or same time 304 feet soutn of the west line of e&xa thence, south on a line parallel of the north Tieet LOO from the west line of said Lot .. life tee/m^rrOr^eas ‘to the north th:Tlacrr/L"eg&^ - government survey thereof a r r City of OROINO Q cmr OF QRONa RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2907NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO . MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (C)l 4 2 FILE 11603 WHEREAS, Irwin Jacobs ^q® g the owner of the property orono (hereinafter "City”)1075 Millston Road within the ^ity or uror.o ui« and legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant q3 Subdivision 9 variances to of^a greenhouse totalling 2,604 (C)l to permit structure because s.f. in area, considered an oversiz nronertv that already it exceeds 1,000 s.f. in structures; and a variance contains 5 other oversized ^ total of all accessoryto Section 10.03, Subdivision 9(C)2 as the t allowed structure footprint areas at 10,795 s.f. exceeas total area of 6,000 s.f. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1603 2. The property is located ^/eqifrfng"VUtf Lakeshore Residential 1700 Shoreline Drive consists area. The propertv bulrd^ble. The property of 'i n7S Millston Road consists of 2.7 acres. Thelocated at 107 wo+-h nrooerties is approximatelytotal sum of the areas of both properties is vv 33 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Co-iss^on^_revi^^^^^^ vSria°nces ts proposed based upon the following findings: A) The total area of both properties equals 33+ acres n area. Page 1 of 4 •t L arr OF af?CDiOi City of ORONO BESOUUTION of the city COUNCt _ 2907 ______ accessory structure r.r%r. adjacent .^rMiHston because properties within the mi t.oundaries evergreen the adjacent residentiaproperty and within the a j 411 supply plantings f Slds^JoMu^-S ^/^ea^ on ^ this property a p zoning <^^®tric^* ^ ^^tions, rarYa'^c%^w:^pH^no^ or^T^er -.r^ to “ no r i n, P-/3-\Vcan “:“but "i°s necessary 5. The City counci l ha^s ^n^.^^attons of ^T>t%Fl-ni"„^, ^C-o^ir^s^^nr^^PO "»Vy Cit^^^ tne HeaitH. ta?et\^Vd ”wlffari 0*^ tne^ eo™sunity. CONCLOSIOHS. OHDER AMD COHDIT.OHS Based upon one or "“te « °"^=^P|£it°"t!!lBasea UF . „PY grants n and 2 to permit rnesrr ,is.r p..r ..••• •■'■ ■”•■ subject"" tVtL following conditions. ^^^bination of the 2 i;de%rnt%^^^P^TtL\"ircat‘ed%t iO. HiHston Road an i?C0 Shoreline Drive. Page 2 of 4 City of OROIVO arr RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF OFTONa NO.2907 2. The owner shall execute covenants for non-resident ia1 oversized accessory structures consisting of the following: Detached garage Detached garage Greenhouse 1,414 s.f. 1,008 s.f« 2,604 s.f. The covenants shall include a special condition for the greenhouse that would require the removal at the time of a future subdivision. 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 1C, 1991). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any cf the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of December, 1990. ATTE Property^ Owner/S') i/ Page 3 of 4 r .I il A [> ary I iI QRONa City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 290"_______ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )S5 . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of December 1990, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M, Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behal of the City. HENNEPIN COUNjr STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) 7On this _ _ _ _ _ day of J ^ ^ ^ before me a ^tary Public^within and for said county, personally appeared ^ ^ ^ ^ c: known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrumen ;, and acknowledged that he (they) executed JfcOUdUAtUWLr) free act and deed. ^ ROSOMRY* .v^i^ ;ioT«Y n«jc- ; SOOTTOOUnV \ MyCommaBnExmJNr&lMB c v_5- Tlji NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _ _ _ day ofun tnis aay uj. _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ _t 199_, before me^a Notary Public within and for said County, personally me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 cmr OF QRONQJ City of OROrVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -90" - EXHIBIT A That part of Government Lots 1 and 2 in Section 10, in Township 117 of Range 23 which is described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point 6 chains west of the meander post in the southeast corner of said Lot 2 in said Section 10; the thence running north 20 chains more or less, to the shore of Round Lake, so-called; thence along and around the westerly and northerly shore of said Lake to the meander corner in the north shore of said Lake and between Section 10 and 11 in said Township and Range; thence north on the section line between said Section 10 and 11 to the southerly line of the right-of-way of the Minnetonka Branch of the Great Northern Railway thence south­ westerly along said southerly line of said right-of-way to the point of the intersection of said southerly line of the said right-of-way with the west line of said Lot 1; thence turning and running in a straight line in a southeasterly direction 654.8 feet, more or less to a point which is 236.8 feet east of the west line of said Lot 2 and at the same time 304 feet south of the north line of said Lot 2; thence, south on a linf parallel with and distant 236.8 feet east from the west line of said Lot 2, 1,016 feet more or less, to the north shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence easterly along the said shore of said Lake Minnetonka to the place of beginning, according to the government survey thereof; and Lot 2, Block 1, Millston, all in Hennepin County, Minnesota, I t __ _1 :sf k E 4 J5 To: From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron M(X)rse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Septembe’’ 16, 1993 #1865 David Owen. 2248 Shadywood Road - Variances - Public Hearing Applicant proposes strucniral repairs to the existing detached garage and retaining walls consisting of a new concrete garage floor and parking pad to west. The purpose is to raise the garage floor and pad approximately 8" to prevent street runoff from entering garage. Paving will also be overlaid over existing driveway and apron in an attempt to control the street runotl. Existing concrete steps and wooden handrails will be installed adjacent to the parking pad, major portions of which are located within the County right-ot-way. Fhe garage is located within a substandard side and street setback and there are e.xcesses of hardcover within the 250-500’ setback area. Tlie following ordinances are pertinent to the review; 1. Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (P) - Setbacks. A. Street Setback (30’ setback required for garage with doors opening to street) Required = 30’ Existing = 1 ’ 2" at southwest side (10 if County agrees to release land not included within travelled or used right-of-way of Cry stal Bay Road, refer to Exhibit F) Proposed = 9 ’ at southeast side if unused right-of-way is released to property owner Variance = 28.8" or 96% if County does not release land Variance = 21 ’ or 70% upon release of land B. Side Setback Required - 10’ Exislitig •- 4’ 3" Proposed = 4’ 3" Variance = 5 ’ 7" or 57% Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover (Refer to Exhibit E). M • 0-75 ’ setback area = 3, 850 s.f. No hardcover recorded. No change proposed. 75-250 ’ setback area = 9,582 s.f. Exiting = 2,221 s.f. or 23.18% Proposed = 2,221 s.f. or 23.18% Zoning File #1865 September 16, 1993 Page 2 * 250-500’ setback area = 1.076 s.f. Existing = 835 s.f. or 77.60% Proposed = 835 s.t. or 77.60% No change proposed. Note expanded improvements proposed adjacent to parking pad are located within County right-of-way. If City and County agree to release land to applicant, hardcover facts will be adjusted in addition to the additional area increase for setback area. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage. Total lot area = 14,508 s.f. Allowed = 2,176.2 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 2.052 s.f. o’* 14.1% No variance required. List of Exhibit.s A - Application B - Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Hardcover Fact Sheets F - Sketch of Existing Improvements G - Sketch of Proposed Improvements H - Elevations I - Easement Descriptions J - Survey Description of Request I he applicant proposes major repairs of existing garage and retaining walls tor the purpose of improving drainage as street runoff that currently drains into garage. The existing garage at the southwest comer is located 1’ 2" from the current right-of-way of the County road. Certain paving and stair improvements are proposed within the expanded County right-of-way. Staff has been in contact with Dave Zetterstrohm of the County D.O .T. who has confirmed that they have no interest in the additional right-of-way. Review Exhibit I, it would appear the easement was acquired for the purpose of installing snow fencing. The County no longer uses snow fencing in this area. Zetterstrohm confirmed that the County would have no problem with deeding back the right-of-way to the property owner. Major portions of the easement area are occupied by Crystal Bay Road. Zoning File #1865 September 16, 1993 Page 3 Review Exhibit F. Staff has darkened the line defining the used or travelled right-of-way of Crystal Bay Road that is currently maintained by the City of Orono. John Cierhardson ha.> confinned that the City of Orono has no interest in the remaining ponion of the property and would concur that property could be deeded back to the applicant. Applicant should be advised to contact the County to determine if they arc willing to quit claim untravelled ponion of the right-of-way. Statement of Hardship Review Exhibit B. Staff has nothing to add to the Statement of Hardship. I.ssues for Consideration 1. Hardcover e.xcesscs exist within the limited area of the 250-500' setback area. Are removals feasible w ithout creating potential hazard.’ Other issues raised by Planning Commission. If M: 1 ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION >pplication Fee $175.00 -.vo per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) c / * V. * w ■A vj .rs m • • PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired Avtli (month/year) I (^) (^o not) also own thef adjacent parcels of land. property: residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District:_ _\C^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ • n APPLICANT Name Phone (home) Arl\' 7^^3 ___ Phone (wor)c) Address: ^C^cK\JC00(l Pfi City : zip: ^^39 i OVIMER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) N2une Phone (wor)c) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Estimated Construction Cost $ ‘SOO. CSL. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setbac)c Lot Width : JC Sid« Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITION.^ Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements----------- 1 ‘ j ,*'I (attach additional sheets if necessary) ^ following information must be submitted_by_the—applicatign\ deadline date in order for your application to be^n^sidered complete; 1* [/ Completed Application Fom 2. T“certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain *- -vhis list fren Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3, Vpiat Map (obtained with property owners list). ^ 4 “^certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include ‘-----hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy SK-xll" for reproduction). . ^ 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy Sh xll ). 6. i/sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8*j xll ). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list o any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vonr variance application is not complete If the above j[p£orfii3*'ti.on has pot been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee pa>*ment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and cornet to-t^ebest of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further^ authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consu a » agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification ^ this r^uest. Owner•s Signature - ____■■■!!!■ '' Applicant must have all aubmittals into the City offices 25 J’®? Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings ate . third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at al . . review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an app unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Bull g Office of this change prior to the meeting. L 13 c^ ‘*; ^rrs' 3 i s % V 4 .<.! ^ > \%w VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM OWEN RESIDENCE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION August 26, 1993 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST! Intent is to repair existing structures; including repair of garage and retaining wall, replacement of concrete garage floor and parking pad, and elevation of same 8" to prevent street runoff from entering garage. Asphalt will be overlaid on existing driveway and apron for garage accessibility and control of street runoff. Existing concrete steps and wooden handrail will also be replaced. (See detailed plans.) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTIQN OF UNUSUAL CONDITIONS; Garage and parking area are constructed within the setbacks, with retaining walls supporting 2 sides and part of 3rd side. To meet setbacks would require starting over with new retaining walls on the steep slope, resulting in dramatically increased hardcover closer to the lake, and removal of 2-3 mature trees. Street setback would have been met except for county easement. IVi* • > • ■ "V V . ,;r % **C- ,-‘ ‘--‘- -4 _ _ Jr •4 c 30 >? (53) -o ^ ? ? !0 5 PS.' M? (3?) .3 30" ~ fO^ •c 30 9 I »45' bO T ? .* 7-^ (??) /'. 30 5^ / 30 3 ' ? / , 30 (in y 30 r [ bO 3 (26) 50 P<P'p- ♦J r r-i r < 13 14 13 - 15 1;•8*13 ?0*22* :34)(35>( 1501 ( 149^(40)(4?) /• •//<’ y /•'/ a 50 10 h-«0 •0 Vi O I* l \vING5TCN X'30 s, .^ i «n X } *n 5 iTl te 1 »s. ^5C ^« «> « 9?7;^3^3? (1?)( ID ( ’0 “)(9)(a)(7)(6) 50 "30 »50 50 30 ? »2 fS, r’l 14 j”16 ( 139) ■•X ('5^ *-" \m \yrr ( !9) ^ iqi X*-SL ?i}JO ^ 1vx N J9 D - (51) /. 30 :x) If / 30 •jO »0* (50) 50 1-:< (46) >1 -< h 50 wj 3? (44) / 50 bO 'j ■ X 30 'A, 1 5 (43) 50 »n w-l ^»r**41 -?3 14''15 >6 ^ ? - 17 19 ?r 23? ; »33 (55)(5^.'(57)(»)( X.-—.......•X /-j0 »■: .■;• s N s 5S S S «»3 s T 50 fO !0. 7^ U»3 T!" '‘.I ;3^ 30 • 0^' ,4ir J. fO *- ( »06 8 * k ‘05) :o 7 L^RIC 2 < > < ^'° ;s; 5 ( »03i * ^ 6 - 104) ^vlJ ,ri 4 *9 T?o 4 - J. 3- ('0?: /< 30 ‘C ^ 3, ()0») y, I - 100) :0 '^!4 M :»} '3 (70) 50 » M? (69) » 5^, '0 - (66) M 9? ✓: 50 y 9 (14 11 • !0 y r? (65) » 6 " (64) » 5- (63) 50 5C n 4? (6?) /. 30 * 1 3l- 1'-'^ 1 ?o 54 n ?2? (60) /< 30 D ■i. 1 * r :l in n9 n /s^n »n 4t n '( ;?;31;'5 *6“17 -19-’9^20-^22-^23-24-26 27-?• 171)(7?)(73)(74)(75)X (76)(77)(78) y ? •'/ (79)(80) 4 V ^ A (9 ??X X s ✓f X JO X jg X A ■ X jg X • 7 fPI 3C ivE nr* ^3 io ^1C 50 iJ ^n!!I w y 50 4W '1 1 r,?»2*1 r 'O" n 8"' n| 7?"(5^5^ n 4?3:2 I ^0 (90) (69) • (8fl) ^, • (67) *f (85)X (83')V ?? 50 50 36-^*30 30 I ' 30 30 N30 30 30 30 30 30 [r A n n n 1 •(66)n n 3; .5;Pt,)• 1 • 1/^ • r - ’5 “'«”1 ?“'0 “*;; “ r • ’4 -1 IT ci ij L fv w RUN DATE Oe/2S/n BATCH 001 PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR 0»t«R NAHE TAXPAYER NA»C/AOOR PROP AOOR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR MEW4EPIN COWTY PROPERTY INTORHATION SYStEH PROPERTY OItTERS LIST SB 17-1X7-25 A2 0001 022A0 SHAOYHOOO RO CHRISTINE ARKO FREEMAN CHRISTINE ARKO FREEMAN 22A0 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA MN 553?1 50 17-117-25 A2 000« 02215 SHAOYHOOO RO JAMES G GOTHHATtr ETAL JAMES 6 G0TW1ATM 2215 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA m 55591 58 17-117-25 55 0125 02240 SHAOYHOOO RO OAR OHEN OAVIO S OHEN 2250 SHAOYHOOO RD HAYZATA m 55391 50 17-117-23 53 0129 02257 SHAOYHOOO RO 0 L SCHUOER ASM SCHUOER OANIEL L A SUSAN M SCHUOER 1111 MAXMELL APT 237 OOULOER CO 80305 50 l.’-117-23 52 0002 02232 SHAOYHOOO RO RICHARD LEE KOKESH RICHARD L KOKESH 2232 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA MN 55351 SO 17-117-23 53 0125 02255 SHAOYHOOO RO EVELYN S TRUTNAU EVELYN S TRUTNAU 2255 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA m 55391 59 17-117-23 53 0127 02259 SHAOYHOOO RO M 0 SCHAFER ACE SCHAFER MICHAEL A CHRISTINA SCHAFER 2259 SHAOYHOOO RD HAYZATA MN 55391 50 17-117-23 53 0155 02229 SHAOYHOOO RO JAY PIEPER SUSAN A TODO PIEPER 2229 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA TfT 55391 REPORT ND. PAGE P15S5501 1 ■i".; C/^ f i V 38 17-117-23 52 0003 02225 SHAOYHOOO RO MICHAEL PIRICH TRUSTEE MICHAEL PIRICH 2225 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA T« 55391 f V 9 • 58 17-117-23 53 0125 02255 SHAOYHOOO RO N H HEY JR A J R MEY HILLIAM H MEY JR 2255 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA MN 55391 JO C c CO * ••• < 0 I . 4 58 17-117-23 53 0128 02255 SHAOYHOOO RO J G SATHER A K F SATHER JOHN A KATHLEEN SATHER 2255 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA TtT 55391 T L TOTAL BATC.i 001 00011 "Jfe < I t . . i 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OtI THE RECORDS OF THE HETWEPIN COLMTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATlONi TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEOGE ANO BELIEF. ' 1 DATE' ■I f • *• HARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET * * • m • • • • <?- 2 setback ZONE: (circle cne ) p-75' Existing Hardcover in Zone 75-250^ (^0-500^ 500-1000' • A . House ‘ x .a • , 1 • Si F. LENGTH WIDTH M MM Mil I X a S.F. •• • % X • • •• • • • # S.F. X •m •*S. F •* • •.« j • 5I X • S*F. ' M• . - 3.Garage 2 0.3 ^ 2o.l (- n)»3?7 S.F# C.D riveway x ■a t SiFi X • mm ~ * * V• t • StF. •» r* * D.Sidewalk • x a SiF. • ■ • % • ■ • » X %' ■■A * * * •1 .• SiFt • • • ’• ' • • * » -.... X __S.F, •% •• L-’ • • , E. .^atio / D eck X • • S.F,’ ■ i ^ ! F. Landscape focic e .• 1 S.F. . i; • AREAS UNDERLAIN . BY X —22 S.F. 9 . ' PLASTIC SHEETING X • • 9 • 1 t • * « m • • «* S.F. 1 * CO/ue, sue 3.3 ^ 2,Z jsry 7 • S.F.: • G. Other x •S.F. • ^ i Total Hardcover in Z one £xcic<4f//jc^ ^OAd T otal Property A rea in Zone ^A S fC • V r^s S.F., [Jl rj5 B /<>7.€ ■ V 100 - /o7( rn « 7Z^O . %^ (•••*# • •• #•• • HARDCOVER CALCULATION KORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) C0-7ix 75 250' 250-500' 500-10C0' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House B. Garage c. Driveway E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other LENGTH D. Sidewalk _i X X X WIDTH X _ Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone • •• • • S.F. S.F. S.Fi S.F. • . * S.F. # ^ S.F. S,F. S.F. S.F. . I S.F. . S.F. >1 ^ ^ ll S.F. S.F.v" ^ ^ W--S*/ S.F. 1 S.F. • « /•■ ' <hi- • S.F. # upsL'rr S.F. * * «♦«• •* S.F. •'.i • H# .0 B 3^5o. X 100'- 39SO [2 O . 90 •• • i • • * • J . 1 N RUIIlAL^.1 hi * ..h^h.L m ' \ :■ ) I £a ^ a \ -H:: ► ^ »‘*'S * * * • • • HARDCOVER CALCULATION -WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0*75' (g"25oj) 250-500* 500-1000 Existing Hardcover !n Zone ir-zs-?s \ A. House 5~y. ? X LENGTH _^LiLx WIDTH A y 5 y >_ _2^ ?. 7 2. r 3. Garage c. Driveway X _ D. Sidewalk _ E eck°^ ^^r/o Elects /yr/» ^tactf X F. Landscape _________a________ areas UNDERLAIN BY ■ , ______________ X ________ PLASTIC SHEETING _____________ X ________ ZSO 50^7. G. Other ___ Total Hardcover in Zone • ,1 Total Property Area in Zone 2 22/ 4 • /7J7, y S.F. C.3 2/. a • * # ’ « /€*fO S.F. 7S.Z S.F. 9 S.F. • » • /s S.F. I S.F. t S.F. /7Z S.F. S • f I S • F • S.F. 2 O • • ----------’S.F.• % • » S.F. • S.F. . 9 • • • - /Z5 S.F. ft S S3 S.F.• • % 22 2 t S.F. • •[TJ [3 ,?S2Z S.F. • ' ^ X 100 - r ■€£:y^r 1 •__1 , To • « t i«v% I VO rror. u ro ftot'tr. -— u i»(i* iipN t4ei^ U- <; TIM- r<nrtr « p^ocJh- HhX' rw‘o» »«-xc<»ic.‘ trtn« \ rwA« MmH 1^ M><4' /— r •-reivt/br tKaJ^ vm- r^rw tf HfT<> »irw f re T» «4>r».A# rt/OH l4uK V^jifK.V' f%Vj tWlLyAA^ S ft?VTt> ttfC? u#^ve r.r«fv4* t/wttJi art- wH f»tV C*1t. <CTOXl3 / P »4H»F 1MN< */wr»^ / «- W»4itfl H »w imT/^nnv* M-vAT ttfiut \vf< ^ t «T»r 2. 0 fAi«nY,^W- 4. ,V t^ ltjf. tX<J^ y 0^ u^v4e^ futf^ irAiM <;fl^U4^ -fo r r tOTUq* |ti u»^ ^2 ^fHt9Q Ur^. IM«> m\Ke vapfi/'ir i%f/ ifriM i>i>HU> #iua?, rr^^i'p ^ Ht,y/ U^k^. tAuJfJ^’ ^U- U11K4 /swxXT t^vr. (H^ha» Kv^ rrr % IsS-tA t-r/f. •t !J f^lf CVtf4^\4 rr^itJui^ -urfic \ 1» ur«.rT -/-"-2 “-; «f. • PHtUJtP fH¥P fmri r iK<4 Vtr UHff:;?■ iilQ-'-- --T-.^ y fArr «u^ ID fWt< ^ If AJP LATflV ID If^MM 10 t4fW■1 u/<ipuiAni a-AiintP /^r*A rr^^' M»i^ 01 j Prrt r^xrtJ^ c r^i Si 1'tf. A Y 1^- Ihvep ^\rtr^' —^ ; cTL tr<p i-*« ^ \ C o O A 1 j t V?*lsNlH6i f<.epAlfs. f=VAN 1 9 F^lPet 16^ <£.;t.4t> t4<M-’r<*4?t> N3, nM. MP«i»v MMavDl/MtaH »on 5 I >•• f» ?i i« / - ^ v1 ' .' '• • N.t . • »14 • • % t'•• ■• t V \ ♦»#■■****ig*'. f Hih^tr- inw\ Pi n» fVtfk U4:r rcLf ttAjc. tiw '.‘i—^ ■ ir ■-------------------------- ■ IZD L_jl„.1 ! ^[ ■ IIi .:\[J /: rMl/x4J l*jun nuf^ t/ 11^1 1 e /r^---------- UM-if' tLU«^s|.tfV — eca.)TH ^Ui-V-KTlcti ' rr^l\ |V>-^T Ki^av-c^ —" rmtK^^ for ui;: nv-iH 9-trji. pt ►VViKVT* TO rV-OTTs, f«cr 14» rwwcwwHT iTfitiPp #«VKr CiX4P ^ •«H*T — r>rjr KfMrW svcw- it> MfMl - • vv^r — rFvP^W> Ca'c, pi<T*-< t—ivm: cr\Xy 'a>» trttvtej'’ Ptw f*M* n»</ttjuov rvti<^ fc/itr- rwv»e> <r- <»ftcr n'vfi'ep tMVt’ V> ^CtT’—I ^>4-.<r M^riAU" iVf.i: vz/'U' ---------CtYHe. V />-R*<n■^'e iK'X -jrer^ i>UiVKrpH - fT</^\ CW'A K^PE/ IC^ rp- . o^gMO. nz4. MPW» PflWl -• >1 ■•# / d Lxliibit "A /• t N // ■■' :^-'- \ ■• ir >" / Lot 7, Clock 1, "Liley's Park" Lake Ninnetonka, accoroing to the recordci' plat thereof, ana situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject to: Easement for highway purposes (15) acr;uired by ttic County of Hennepin over Southv/esterly 29 feea, together \ntli t!:o right to construct and maintain temporary snov/ fences on lanes adjacent thereto, as evidenced by final certificate Document lio. 2757357. Utility Easement granted to Tlie Village of (jrono in Document ho. 3617107 over that part of Lot'7, (ilock 1, ‘Liley ’s Park" Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, r.inresota, tying wittiin l(j feet on each side of the following oescnbec centerline; Cegifimng at a point oti t te Soutficasterly line of said lot distant 125 feet hortheastcrly fret., the i..ust Soutiierly corner of said lot; thence northwesterly to a point on the liorthwestcrly line of said lot distant 114 feet northeasterly from the most '..esterly corner of said lot, and there ending. b. L. To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmcmbers Ron Moorse. City Administrator From: Date: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator September 16, 1993 Subject:#1866, 1867 and 1868 James and Joann Jundt, 1400 Brackett’s Point Road Conditional Use Permits/Variances - Public Hearings Application #1866 involves a conditional use permit required tor caretaker apartment -A ithin second tloor of main house. The City has no record of a conditional use permit being issued for the property . Current owners propose major repair and alteration of original caretaker unit. The following ordinance is penineni to this review: Section 10.23, Subd. 4 - Conditional Use Permit required for non-rental caretaker apartment. Refer to Section 10.20 (G) (2). Application #1867 involves variances to the Shoreland Regulations that would allow a third access stair to lake and a deck within the lakeshore protected area. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review; 1.Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (V) - Staii^vays, lifts and landings. The ordinance does not specifically limit a property to one access stair for lakeshore lots with steep topographies. The property already has two access stairs consisting of stone steps. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) - Deck is proposed at lakeshore where no such struemre is allowed. Structure will be located approximately 2’ from the shoreline resulting in 114 s.f. of t--»rdcover per detail plans on boat dock/access stairs Exhibit J. Per Exhibit I, su- of lakeshore, deck appears to measure 7 X 10’ or 70 s.f. of additional ha--'’: ver. Applicant to clarify. 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover. 0-75 ’ setback area = 130,384 s.f. Existing = 721 s.f. or .55% (20,591 s.f. of area shown for public road is excluded from applicant’s hardcover) Proposed = 966.5 s.f. or .74% Hardcover increase of 245.5 s.l. Aonlication #1868 involves a conditional use pennit to allow the continued use of the guest house structure with separate upper level caretaker apartment. The following ordinance is pertinent for this review: Section 10.23, Subd. 4 (once again refer to Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (G) (1)). Zoning Files #1866. #1867. #1868 September 15. 1993 Page 2 List of Exhibits A1-3 B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I • J - K - L - Applications Plat Map Property Owners List Hardcover Fact Sheets Weekman Report Survey Floor Plan of Main Floor Below Caretaker Apartment Floor Plan of Second Floor Caretaker Apartment Survey-Access Stairs/Boat Dock Boat Dock/Staircase Detail Hardship Statement Survey-Guest House/Careiaker Apartment Application #1866 - Conditional L’se Permit/Caretaker Apartment/Main House Review Exhibits F. G and H. The applicants have been asked to file a conditional use permit to allow the major renovation of the existing caretaker unit on the second floor of the main house. A building permit has been issued to allow commencement of the work, but kitchen area will not be installed until conditional use permit is completed. Refer to Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (G) (2) to review necessar>’ standards for non-rental apartment use. Review Exhibit H. Access to the apartment is via a hallway that connects to the main house with a secondary access from a staircase from the garage below. The apartment shall be for the exclusive use of the domestic employees of owner. The caretaker apartment has never been assigned a separate address by the City. Review Weekman ’s memo. Exhibit E. Council adopted an interim ordinance that will delay the enforcement of the new Septic Ordinance and Shoreland Regulations as they relate to septic systems that do not meet the required 3’ separation from the bottom of the trench to the seasonal water table. Brackett’s Point has been classified as a "hot spot" which means that this area may be considered by Council for sewer. Such areas may be given special consideration but at this time nothing h.as been decided by the Council. During the 13-year septic inspection program, the system has never been found to be surtacing. Staff recommends approval of Application #1866 granting a conditional use permit for the continued use of the caretaker apanmenl subject to the condition that the apa.trnent may never be used for rental use. Application #1867 - Variancc.s to Shoreland Ordinance and Hardcover Regulations to Allow Third Acces.s Stair and Deck at Shoreline Refer to Exhibits 1 and J. As already noted above, there c.ppears to be a conflict between the lakeshore deck proposed with the information from survey and detail plans. The access stair J Zoning riles #1866. #1867, #1868 September 15. 1993 Page 3 ,. with landings no. «cecJing .2. s.t. a,.ached to deck is no. rtoposed. Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibit K. Issues for consideration 1. 2. 3. iXl' wardship statement .at — - - " ^ be abandoned at some to a property. The property cons sts 32-50 s.f.? , ej» g •* f r riiist Housc/Carctakcr Apartment • e- n\H6S - Conditional Use Pernut for Gtnst Apphcation #1868 residential units within Refer to EshiW. ^1L I"ifalsS S is toca.ed 58 ’ Zoning Files #1866, #1867, #1868 September 15, 1993 Page 4 The property consists of 13.8 acres and can support the second independent residential unit. The nature of the structure and the existing setbacks suggests that this propeny would never be subdivided to allow structure to remain as a principal structure. As Weekman's memo notes, septic system need not be upgraded until 1995 or sooner if future repairs require a building permit from the City. Staff Recommendation While major construction is underway, the building and surrounding property has been placed under special security. Staff has asked Kraus-Anderson to arrange for scheduled inspections for Planning Commission members and the Council representative to the September 20th meeting. It will be impossible for members to obuin access to the interior of the main house without scheduling a special time for your inspection. Please contact staff if you are un ible to make the scheduled inspection for Planning Commission member. To recommend approval of a conditional use permit for the existing guest house/caretaker apartment unit for the property located at 1400 Brackett’s Point Road finding there is adequate area to support a second residential unit and that structure is to continue to be tor the sole use of the occupants of the principal building, including their domestic employees or their non ­ paying guests. Applicant is also placed on notice that as structure is located within a substandard setback that any major structural repairs or expansion of this structure in the 30’ required side yard setback will require further review by the City. CXT'i UJ^* UKC*iU i-urui^ oo^ ^VJL X jjo. -t w*.« __^■_ _'______________________________________________________f~jf—“7? ” " “ 7* •"/' ~ (^ PROPERTY LOCATION | ] ^-‘ ‘ : «- a / ‘ ■''' ii ; " "Vx . / \\ 3 site Address 1400 Bracketts Point Road» Orodo, MN - -;- -^ Property Identification Nunber (P.I.D.) ___1111723330001_-------------- ^ , Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ________________________________ APPLICAJJT Phone (hcme)^------------------------------------ NaT.e Kr^us-Anderson Construction Compag^one (work) (612) 786-7711------- Midwest Dxvision crAi^ Address «fi2S Rendova street NE ______--------------------------------------------------------- oJ^iJ^’af'different than applicant) Phone (heme) ■171-0299 ------------------ J£imes and Joann Jundt_ _ _ _ _ __ Phone _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address 2200 Huntington Point Road_ _ _ _ City . Wayza^- - - Zip 55391-- Date Property Acquired __ _ _ _March 19J2- - -- -_ (nonth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fees - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) X $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartnept^ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain • - - - - Grading and falling - 101 cu. yd. or more i^keshore ' . Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of Ic.keshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Reneval Fee - $100.00 (no chance from original application) ^?lr-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER AFPMCATIOHS^ Commercial Site Plan Review (t consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation -------- $175.00 Easement Vacation ^ ^ ■- - - - $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision - - - - $300.00 Retcning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ' $3 00.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other “ see fee schedule I tI Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESC2UPTI0N OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:Apartment in Main House REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtai this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmen Center 343-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existin.g and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate last of any other persons you wish notified of thrs application. 3 4 5 6. 7. YOU ARB REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR _ A WORKING COPY (11** X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff; _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to tlyi^best of his/her knowledge. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date OWNERS SIGNATURE Applicant's signature / th^best of his/her kne Margaret Kittinger, Beyer, Blinder, Belle-Architects signed on behalf of James and Joann Jundt ff J •A ICITY OP ORCNO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^n Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) « •I K V%t (j tr PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 1400 Bracketts Point Roady Oronoy MN Property Identif. Number (P.I.D. )1111723330001 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired March 1992 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; X residential other(specify) Zoning District;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Phone (home) Name Kraus-Anderson Construction CompanyPhore (wor)c) (612) 786-7711 Midwest Division Address; 8625 Rendova Street NE City; Circle Pines Zip;—55Q1^- - OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) 471-0299 Name James and Joann Jundt Phone (worlc) Address: 2200 Huntington Point RdCity; Wayzata Zip; 55391 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 10.000.00 Describe request in detail; Boat Dock Stairs VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage X Setback;Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements ----------- j CIT> OP OKOJIO - GZ^iPJtAL LAND USZ APPLlCAli^N^________________^1-- —-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r-/S&9 ;.;PROPERTY location ^ ^ •• ' , . Site Address 1400 vc^int Road, OrOno, MN- - - - - - - - - - | Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) —1 111723330001- - - - -- Please attach legal desc.xption to ap,licaticn if not included on required survey. ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ applicant Name Kraus-Andcrson ronstruction CompaW.one fv^ork) (6U) 786-77U- - - THawesF-DiVIsISrr _ ^ Circle Pines Zip 55014----- Address 8625 Rendova Str^^t NE ________.____1------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------- a.) Phone fheme) 471-0299------------------ OWNER (if different than appl-can^) Name James and Joann Jundt- - - - - - -- Phone- - - -- - ■ ' Sddrese PPnn Hnntineton PoLni_H°Sd- - - - _Wai5ata- - - zip.55391_ • J „ u (month/year) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- PEES ~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS _ _ _ _ 5 so.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use _ _ _ _ $175.00 Institutional (church, sc.hool, etc.) X $150.00/Gce7^ ijuse/Cuest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200 00 Land Alteration /- And filling - designated wetland or floodplain = S”din^;"seawill\"7et'aininrwaU^ CItMnSo- c£ lakcshcre PRD/PID - see fee schedule ' 1 r. sine 00 (no change from original application) K?«-the-lact “r- DcSble Current Application Fee OTHER Cccmercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees; ■- - - -$250.00 Vacation 33::::: S175.00 Easement ^ Subdivision s 75.00 Easement schedule) —--------- $300.00 Rezonxng (FUU —“ $300.00 Comprehensive Flan Am —“ $100.00 Appeals ^ ^ . ----------- Other “ see fee schedule ! 4 USiS Uf’ rAOr'riKTi Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:Caretaker's IIouse-Apartmont 2. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtai this list fiom Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governmer. Center 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (exi s t i n.g and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons ycu wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification hy Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to t^ bes^of his/her Jcnowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorised reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. , Owner's signature^'/ ^ X. j^^jPate _____ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have^ an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Margaret Kittinger, Beyer, Blinder, Belle-Architects signed on behalf of James and Joann Jundt ! «»< OATf 08/2ft/n MTCM OM J r'i ^wi» ASM OMCA NAME •«f TAXPAYfR V" HMC/AOOR • 'p' pmm Aoofi : f OWCR NAME ^ taxpayer NAME/AOOR %. ■ » V ‘ > ' .■* J i, PROP AOOR >.• OMCR NAME |ty:. TAXPAYER nahe/aoor V a •t- ■ ■ PROP AOOR (PtCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR O ii .. 5® 11-117-25 52 000^ OlAOO ORACKETTS POINT RD J R JLNDT A MARY J JUNDT JRMiS R JUNDT BOX f CRYSTAL BAY MN 55325 50 11-117-25 52 0017 01500 BRACKETTS POINT RO GEORGE S PILLS6URY ET AL GEORGE S PIU3BURY ROOO FIRST BANK PLACE HPIS H4 55A02 50 11-117-25 55 0001 01A20 BRACKETTS POINT RO J R JLMDT A M J JUNDT JAMES R JUM)T BOX 1 CRYSTAL BAY W 55525 58 11-117-25 35 0006 01500 BRACKETTS POINT RO HARIHA S a a LACHLAN REED MARTHA S A A LACHLAN REID 1500 BRACKETTS POINT RO NAY2ATA m 55591 ‘‘I •J . -t eyv ’ O}•l> .l..- I*n • • 4 * I « • I - * • .7 '9 f , • # • ^ i- i. i h:, -pV • HEr»4CPIN COLffTY *ROPERTY INrORMATION SYSTEM propcrtv omjers list 5B 11-117-25 32 0010 01.;65 BRACKETTS POINT RO MICHAEL E lYIM III A WIFE MICHAEL I JORJA LYTAl 111 1265 BRACKETTS POINT MAV2ATA Kt4 55591 58 11-117-23 52 OOIB 01220 BRACKETTS POINT RO ELLA P CROGOV ELLA P CROSBY 1220 BRACKETTS POINT RO MAYZATA 55391 58 11-117-23 33 0004 01450 BRACKETTS POINT RO MARTHA S A A LACHLAN REEO MARTHA S A A LACHLAN REEO 1500 BRACKETTS POINT RO MAYZATA KW 55391 total batch 004 00010 REPCRT no. PI4554Q1 PACE 12 58 11-117-25 32 0011 01420 BRACKETTS POINT RD J R JUNDT A M J JUNDT JAMES R JUNDT COX 1 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55325 58 11-117-23 32 0019 01280 BRACKETTS POINT RD J0JB4 S PILLSBURY JR ET AL JOHN S PILLSBURY JR 4800 riRST BANK, PLACE MPLS KW 55402 58 11-M7-23 33 0005 I 01480 BRACKETTS POINT RD ^ PAL HEADRICK ROGER L A LYNN C HEADRICK 1480 BRACKETTS POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 r <! DATE ^9 i. rs U HARE‘COV£R CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE CNE)'O-75'I 75-250' 250-5C0'500-ICCO' • E xisting Hardcover in Zone • • • nnn'TOnTTCi? i. \^ -- ; 196 s.F. LENGTH WIDTH *X *S.F.« >* • • S.F. Xi S S.F. X a S.F. q (iAPAr?r X S 1 r* •V- i j• r n D r V cw A V X a 20.591 S. r • 'X .V / . ..-N (Public) X m • s.F. 4 7 ■ V n ^ r n c w A f X X ~ 195 S.F. ft a stone Steps X 280 » 50 S.F. X . S • r . :E. Patio/ bECK ■• s.F. e 1 ^ M n c r ^ 5 c X •S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN nv X a S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING a • S ■ r* •• X s.F. G. Other x _s S.F. Total Kardcoves in Zone Total Property Area in Zone 21,312 s.F. A 21.312 4 B I iin.3R4 X 100 130.384 s.F. .6/' X 16.35___/0 L.. - r HARDCOVER CALCUU\TICN 'n’ORKSHErT SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 | 75-2v0_ Existing Hardcover in Zone 230-500' 500-IGCO' A. ■ H ouse LENGTH Caretaker’s House Hain 3. G arageCaretaker’s Garage c. Driveway _ _ _ D. Sidewalk E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ; . PL-ASTIC SHEETING Tennis Hut. Tennis Court G. Other _ WIDTH 8,386_ S.F. • 5,884 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 1,400 S.F. 822 7,375 S.F, 2,700 7,340 S.F. A Y 6,412 229 S•r 1 Y 150 S.F. Y S.F. Y 1,600 Y 305 S.F. Y S.F. Y « • S t F • Y 120s.F. Y 7,200 S.F. • IN Zone AO -021 S.F. IN Zone 317.893 S.F. V*fc ^ i r 'r- 1 ? - % ■' ■ 4 _A 5 49.923 4 B 1 1 r*^93 X 100 .7_ __/o At II H.ARDCOVER CALCULATION VOR:<SHE::i SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE one ) 0~75' 75-250' Existing H ardcover in Zone 250-5Q0J 50Q-IGC0 Total H ardcover in Zone # Total Property A rea in Zone l.lrl69 s.F. 155.515 S.F. _A B D A. ■ House •X s • S.F. LENGTH WIDTH •• X -S.F. . X • • S.F. • •X s S.F. X S.F. ^ A P • X 3S <S • r I j$ u Ma MvJC _ c. Driveway ,X 3 5,579 S • r •0 1 2,790 • X =2,800 s.F.• D. S idewalk X S.F. • ^ % X .S.F. • V St S.F. \ £. Patio/ Deck K a . •S.F, • * J - •S.F. .« ^ 1 p t I 1 LJ w ^ r mmi ^ AREAS UNDERLAIN Q V • S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING V S.*". • Y S.F. G. Other _ X —^-----------—. S.F. A L 1 5«^ .R1 S X 100 = -13.■% 4 1 To: From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building and Zoning Adminislralor Stephen Weekman, On-Siie Systems Manager September 13, 1993 #1868 James and Joann Jundi. 1400 Brackett's Point Road - Septic Review As a result of the renovation project for 1400 Brackett ’s Point Road, the existing septic systems serving the property needed to be verified as c(xle-confomiing due to the newly adopted Shoreland Regulations. Site evaluation for the property indicates that the existing systems for both the caretaker and main residences are non-conforming due to the absence of a 3 ’ separation between the treatment area and the seasonally high water table. Therefore, the septic system for the main residence must be replaced concurrently with the renovation of the main residence. Since no work is planned at this time for the caretaker residence, the repair of this septic system can be made prior to December 31. 1995 or at the time a permit is issued for any improvements regarding the caretaker complex, whichever comes first. Site evalu,.iion and septic system design have been completed and approved for both residences. 7 ‘S'. / * "i'rI r* b.Pi'll lliijll I ■ ii! 1 ‘15 r Mi? . ■ J |S ' i rJ I- fp ••• i • * * '• . » * i. •:.. '•: ’*. ♦ •. * * •i* •* •♦** »• t • .••< • . 1 • • • • '. ’ *• * • • ' t */ •^ t • • * .*'• ' ‘ * *■ %• *-* i* •.» . i ••O H cn M O •• - A -»..*• • . ’ •0 o a ■*•• 1 .•/ ■ *. *3 OH • * * ^ * . *• .* ; .!si r.-'-v ■• .; - i’: - ■ ■ ■* .. ■ • % , • /■ e 5 ‘’“¥ I !/\J - 'Zo l \ \ ' A vS' •\ s \ A A V. N TjOMTfQiusi-; dock -fee Agcii p-.vf/2^. \ N I--'•r ••' \ . \ ' •. ' \ ••• ■• . 7' ■ . ^0‘vfAPii ■■.'■ V ^ iwn ^ A ■';'x''CAv.'Os ------------------------^ V ■\ 'V •v ^4/. . ^ . • >. •<g>0Acf C^/ji If* • * ' * .. -. la^ a-x ■ ■ . .X ’I •'/ . w-"). . '•^■r? y^i r : '[■• \\ ' •* . . / • REA''2 • •V • / // /•^'- //A..' 1//! mmmi \ ■ I 7 . V' *• • / * • •• -^ i / I • I J /' t- 7 ' / /'Am L:'^:l■^ I' :. r,i 4 t'. mm' .-n -J; If ,-i tillws ''^>y.- V . ■ •■;•■■ .•>.' ••• k- ffmm' / • /‘ *-/ / / -V.C '*r.7/ 4 i * •..-, //.•' / :*?■ * ‘v V ♦ • • _. • -. •>» • , » : •# :r m - ' ‘ ' V‘.’ ■iv:- ■ ^ •’■* •' ’’ v:.. . >’’ 7 ' :* .• .•• *»•.-: . 1 • te . V .•• • » * 4 * .' */• ■-•' .. *• ■-* -‘.* '.V . ’ •• . * t ..' . ’W. . • • •! • .•■• -.■,. ■ •“« • - 1. >4 / j; ' v / ■' *-w ■ /■'•' ' X ■'■ • /’• .•• ’l.'r '*' •rS'-V - ’j: ^ V:'-W■■/■•“> vi'vj ' , , : ■ • /•• •VvAv- - ■-■■;' /-a/' ' “ -r ' ^ ‘!i/ ■■■ ^r''-A xi 'm •■•■ ^ //o UlL f ' r .♦ • . . • . • • • • »^ 7 • *• . ^ ' ' i’ • I . . * ' ' ■ * . :..' •; •A.,r.-3>-.:• '■■••"< • :’'• .•, a)- •■ :'■■ '• ' . - Y ^ ^ ^ ,* * ^ _____. ' _______ ; . ' * I r IL August 27, 1993 KRAUS-.\NDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMRVNT ( 0\TK\( 7( )KS N t ()\SrKlATK)\ MWAC.I Ks Ms. Jeanne Mabusih City of Orono 2750 Kellv Parkway Orono, NIN 55356 ' I i s , / / • f * *i //\.'; ''-5=;J RE: South wavs Residence v'ariance .Application lioat Dock Stairs Dear Ms. Mabusth: The following list of items describe the hardship and unusual property conditions for this request: Existing stone stainvay and boat house will be abandoned. No other access to lakeshorc is a\'ailable. 3) The Owners want the stainvay more accessible to the new Pool/Tennis PaMllion House. Due to the steepness of the existing shoreline this stainvay is nece.ssary. 5) The deck tliat is proposed for the lower portion of the stainvay is for die placement of lawn irrigation equipment. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact our oirice. Ver)' truly yours. KR.AUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MIDWEST DIVISION Scott A. Crawford Project Manager SAC:rh Midwest Division 8625 N.E. RenHova Street, P.O. Box 158, Circle Pines, MN 55014 Phone: (61 2) 786-7711 FAX: (612) 786-2650 FntfAl Of^fvirfunifv Fmnlnvef i ~ii ■ 1 V/ / /I / // ; >*I / / / f / / / ,-T . // / / / / / / / / / / / / /i / / / / / / /W\\'\Y /i / / /4 // ''A' / j y'Tak^ /.'^ir, / / / / /1 if r /s: (j If t /'.\ / / m fi V- . V 2o'yV>xT f m■:i^ .-TS--^//m «£/> 2J^Vc:K/ \*> '2” ^ Mi//e vrT i / :®v Southways Residence 1400 Bracketts Point Orono, MN Road >1 L'^ii • • V 7 T'^31 # * t. L- k: To:Orono Planning Commission Mcn.t ^rs Mayor Callahan anJ Orono Councilmembcrs Roil Moorse, City \dministrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator September 8, 1993 #1870 Stephen and Randi Carlson, 1185 Arbor Street Variance - Public Hearing Applicants propose a 10 ’ x 24 ’ 8" addition to the north side of the existing single stall garage creating a double stall garage. The existing garage is located 27.3’ from street yard. Addition will be placed at the same setback requiring approval of a street setback variance. The following ordinances are pertinent to the review: 1. Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) - Front/street setback. Required = 50 ’ Proposed = 27 ’ 3" Variance = 22 ’ 7" or 45.4% 2.Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover limitations. The property is located within 1,000 ’ of French Lake, specifically within the 500-1,000 ’ setback area. The property is allowed 35%. The total area of the property is approximately 3'/i acres or 152,460 s.f. and would be allowed 53,360 s.f. of hardcover. Review Exhibit F. The property is at 4,165.6 s.f. List of Exhibits A B C D E F G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Applicants' Addendum Floor Plan Hardcover Sketch Survey Description of Request The applicants propose the installation of an additional stall to die north side ot the existing single stall garage. The existing new garage is in a serious state of disrepair with the floor deteriorating to a point where cars can no longer be stored within the interior for fear of collapsing on lower level storage garage accessed at rear of house. Review Exhibit D. Applicant advises that much of the framework will be retained but that the entire garage foundation would be basically replaced. The single stall yard maintenance garage to the rear will also be retained with the reconstruction. Zoning File September 8, 1993 Page 2 Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibit A. As applicant notes, structure is similar to other structures in the Crystal Bay neighborhood where structures were not constructed under two acre zoning standards. The steeper sloping topographies 'r he rear would require major filling if structure was to be moved further away from street and still be installed as an attached garage. In review of City records, there has never been a vehicular accident resulting with the use of the garage at this location. Isv Jflpt’ CITY OF ORONO — VARIANCE APPLICATION A Initial Application Fee $175.1)0 ($50.00 per each additional variano Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION IAily.r o r. A6 / y • r ■ i I Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I .D. )^ O ^‘ ^ Attach legal description to application not included on reguired surv^^ Date P:Acquired 2 «(month/year) I (doXfdo notll also own the adjacent parcels of Ian . Prescnt'HS^e^f property: _ _ _residential - - -other{specify) Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT Ncune Address Phone (home) lO'^ ^phfll 4 jZv,rl.l Phone (work) , I AriinK citv\l\ln\i/n-tc\__zip=.SS5£licityiMutatin OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _Z' Phone (home) 25 Phone (work) Address: __ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST iGtimated Construction Cost .$__L^_^_£2lZl Describe request .in detail: KXLlV AO hfr\ rp it I \.Mnlt:ULn !,i t?-0 iVARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area lot width X Setback: V Front Other (specify)_ _ _ Cst^ ___ Hardcover ___ Side Rear ___ Average Lakeshore Lot Coverage HARDSHIP/DESCPIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual P P conations preventing compliance with Z^ingCo^ requiremen s. W to .-fyn---- V,AP^l(l)i (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following infonnation must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: 1. v/completed Application Form 2. ^✓Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center . 34«-3271)i' 3.Plat Map Vobtained with property owners list'. 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8Ji"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8?5"xll"). 7. ^As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infonnation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature /Date '.72, OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. ' "OfzL/iQl. DateOwner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cammission eund Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ■5 ” Utu 0,'i'i'ce It) I it ilcC'Wa \y. 5® 10-H7-25 24 0016 010»» NIUON OR S GLORIA K ROOER GLORIA K ROOER low NILLON OR S NAYZATA HN 55591 MOP ADOR ONNEft NAME TAMPAYER NAME/AOOR J« 10-117-25 26 0021 01205 LAKEVIEH AVE A L HOPNOOO A L G HOPMOOO AL L HOPNOOO 922 7TH ST S HOPKINS MN 55565 PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 5® 10-117-25 26 0050 01255 BRIAR ST T E PRANK A B L FRAMC THOMAS A BARBARA FRA(«( 1255 BRIAR ST NAYZATA m 55591 i * .-•i PROP AOOR 0»«CR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 5® 10-117-25 51 0069 01250 ARBOR ST C M HARREN ALA HARREN CHARLES N A LISA A HARREN 1250 ARBOR ST MAYZATA m 55591 I PROP AOOR 0»fCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR r?•i' 5® 10-117-25 51 0072 01265 ARBOR ST JOHN M BOLOINCH KAREN E BJERKENG 1265 aRBOR ST NAYZATA Itl 55591 q u' PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 5® 10-117-25 51 0075 01212 BRIAR ST RAJ KIEMEN RICHARO T KIEHEN 1212 BRIAR ST NAYZATA MN 55591 C'T (t T i HEMIEPIN CCXMTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMIERS LIST5® 10-117-25 26 001701115 NILLON OR S TOOO M GABRIELSON ET AL TOOO M A SUE E GABRIELSON 1115 NILLON OR S NAYZATA m 55591 5® 10-117-25 26 0022 01212 ARBOR ST J R CAOY A S R CADY S R CAOY A J R CAOY 1212 ARBOR ST NAYZATA MN 55591 SB 10-117 25 26 0051 01185 ARBOR ST S A R CARLSON STEPHEN C A RANDI J CARLSON 11B5 ARBOR ST NAYZATA MN 55591 58 10-117-25 51 0070 01215 ARBOR ST CHAUNCEY H SANOGREN ETAL C H SANOGREN 1215 ARBOR STREET NAYZATA MN 55591 58 10-117-25 51 0075 01265 ARBOR ST KAREN E BJERKEr>IG KAREN E BJERKENG 1265 ARBOR ST NAYZATA W 55591 58 10-117-25 51 0095 02170 MirtiETONKA AVE M A J MC CLELLAND MICHAEL P MC CLELLANO 2170 MIltlETOMLA AVE N P O BOX 65 CRYSTAL BAY m 55525 REPORT HO. PI635401 PAGE 1558 10-117-25 26 001901220 LAKEVIEN AVE DOUGLAS PAUL SCHNOOR A NlFE DOUGLAS A NORMA SCHNOOR 1220 LAKEVIEH AV NAYZATA MN 55591 t I 58 10-117-25 26 0025 01225 LAKEVIEH AVE V II ROLLINGS ETAL VIRGIL H ROLLINGS 1225 LAKEVIEH NAYZATA m 55591 58 10-117-25 26 0056 01055 NILLON DR S 0 A J KAYE dale R a JOAN KAYE 1055 NILLON DR NAYZATA MN 55591 58 10-117-25 51 0071 01225 ARBOR ST J M K KErtlEN A L S KENNEN JANICE A LEONARD KENNEN 1225 ARBOR ST NAYZATA rtl 55591 m. >7"ri'^1 51 0076 ST 58 10-117-25 01226 BRIAR MAYBELL KOHLS MAYBELL KOHLS 1226 BRIAR ST NAYZATA MN 55591 58 10-117-25 51 0099 01260 ARBOR ST L S KENNEN A J M KELLAR LEONARD S KEItlEH JANICE M KErtlEN 1225 ARBOR ST NAYZATA MN 55591 ) 1 1RM BATE 08/2A/9S BATCH 005 HEtAiEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY (MIERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435A01 PAGE 14 I i' I I i Cl PROP AOOR OMNEII NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR r ,♦ I It V. • i' ‘ ■ I TOTAt HATCH >• f. . 005 Q0Q18 : f S J J O • •*'4 . 4 I *2 a ?• i-' : u: , H'-l.. Y ' r • •' ■ ' * . ^ r K f. Q: . • •. f. • • * I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPEI^ TAXATION, TO THB^EST OF HY KFXMLEOGE AND BELIEFlELIEF. / / o> < .• It: M f '1 I i \ I ' r t ’Sl'pku 'C/lvkA'\>1156 Mx-iC^rpio H rpd•I i DDzSCfip'M £C\r2^ riecr/ ^cO -e d(Ar. ,i£^ 'pe ovlM c cvr . IS Tl'-\ pep-/' /O'Y^fdVi ^PvU ’>. ,;>2s^''a /j JL W o \ !•{• V* NOin;rtH!?HWAilW*i«NNEAPOU8,MN‘66441’• FAX; («12) 545-2762 • TOLL FREE: (800) 426-7737 • (612)646-1604 ; 0\v''fiCA ^Jd-^MSL,L^ce. z.2^rrfw ------c>>\D . , ]D't '2S' V. }m^^rv'jz. r- t 0^^/^ r &J0] yrrit vv -y.m^/V^ p w k\(A d6't'vU; cUrOj^ (dDtrr, V^V/' ry -xci']\m (U^d. bbc-k ^dddr)'^ jx'' Qf^d^py ~d'i(rk 9 \^ )vA vctr c^'di\i\\ 0vd '^6T>d\Y\c\ Y^vJ Cfyicf^k, CfZ mwc^ C7f u 'Htf, 'l^te/, Nevv) Vdood SVK.ckv!,£. W"-') Y\ . ■ Let\J£v' leod yroy Wh\ fumiw , -A(}Mitv^ (ktw^ mk^ smj --h d^(]’. . Antrl. N»Vsr:.7 ^v^-,3 Y{"\ y tr’' >'n it ,i /I v\ ’ TOUFR6fc(MO)4».7T3T • (611)54S-1M4 i»:: r I.’. w. U. 'f,; w //"■••■■> ^ ':} f.' Uw V OTCPMCM ANP ramp I CARLOOM RCr^^DCNCE 1TS5 A.R'^OR -^TT^ir'—r c ( » rr :! c,? r-? n d ■ ■■■ ■; •;>.,/•■ '1 «4 % CERTIFICCTE OF SURVEY FOR STEPHEN & RANDUCARLSON IN BLOCK 2. MAXWELL’S ADDITION TO CRYSTAL BAY HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA <u to «Q iL‘7 N 26 25 . Z4 3 23’4 22 p: ••e**9. i’l 6- 'V**L.U a $ O 19 O X Id i I 8 i zaojx> 9 'UOj to i . i i ‘ ' S v‘ 101$ I. t. J.,«. S. S. 8, 19. 10. 21. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Of PREH|SIS SUDjfEYEO: 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27 and 26. B1qc|i 2. Haxweirs Addition to Crystal Bay. This survey intends to show the boundarits of the above described property, md tfie location of rn existing house and ihed thereon. It does not purport to show any othfr l9« provenents or*encrpgchments. 0 : Iron narker *Bearings shown are upon an i||untd datun. - .i •H I IN ’ r' COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. -IH2 l.im.u.uk Au ’iuii- • li*ng Like. M\ hl2-l73-mi r-;. V* ^ I I . l. t'« . . . ■ * ‘ ll...' II I .1 .. . $ ;• |'<i «l !■$ Hi «•! I M1» ”**l^ * II -...I M I I • • • I . I. .11 11 'll lint'*. • ••^l I uni im'’L ' ll. i. Mil*I’" M *•» i ■.»iT I d*25*W K M » 93-333 > I oT o\ >A \\W^Z 'S^ \< V^IVip'-V ^/‘ %^EsHor CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 Cnsui Bay, .NLnnesoU 5532^0066 September 16, 1993 To All Affected Property Owners Receiving Notice of a Variance Application for Property Located at 1725 Bohns Point Road Re: Application #1871 Tavlor/Lauer Homes application for variances for proposed improvements to residence at 1725 Bohns Point Road will no longer be required by the Cit>-. The proposed irnpr jvements will not encroach the average lakeshore setback line as assumed from original application imormation. Hardcover excesses have been reduced with the improvements so that harucover vanarces are no longer needed. Please contact the Zoning Office if you have any funher questions. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/ch TFl TPHOVf: - 473-7357 • FAX - 473-0510 To: From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers m Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusfh, Building & Zonirg Administrator Septemoer 16, 1993 #1873 Jack Edwards, 1340 Rest Point Circle - Variances - Public Hearing The applicant proposes a 12‘-6’ x 4’ addition to the east side of the detached garage requiring a street setback variance and a storage addition measuring 8’ x 11’ to the east side of the lower level workshop. The multi-purpose structure consists of two levels. A storage addition to the lower level would also require a street .setback variance. Excesses of hardcover exist within the 0-75 ’ and 75-250 ’ setback aiea. The following ordinances are pertinent to the review: 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D) - Garage strucnires with doors facing away from street and turnaround provided on site are allowed to be 10’ from the street. Required Existing Proposed Variance = 10’ = 2’ 9" = 2’ ± = 8’ or 80% 2. Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B) - Setback for storage addition. Required = 30’ Propose! = 17’ Variance = 13’ or 43% 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover. 0-75 ’ setback a*ca = 6,930 s.f. Existing = 346 s.f. or 4.99% Proposed = 124 s.f. or 1.8% Reducticn = 222 s.f. or 3.2% 75-250 ’ setback area = 13,770 s.f. Allowed hardcover = 3,442.5 s.f. or 25% Existing = 5,566 s.f. or 40.4% Proposed = 5,068 s.f. or 36.8% Variance = 1,625.5 s.f. or 11.8% Reduction in hardcover = 498 s.f. or 3.61% Zoning File #1873 September 16, 1993 Paee 2 Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage Total lot area = 20,700 s.f. Allowed = 3,105 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,419 s.f. or 11.6% Proposed = 2,557 s.f. or 12.3% List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - Application Plat Map Property Owners List Neighbor’s Acknowledgement Form Fl'X)r Plan Elevations Survey Hardcover Fact Sheets Plan of Hardcover Improvements and Removals Description of Request The applicant proposes additions to the multi-use strucnire within the street yard of the lakeshore property requiring street setback variances. The garage addition will be located approximately 2’ from the street lot line and the storage addition 17’. Proposed improvements result in 138 s.f. of new strucniral hardcover with the concurrent removal of 222 s.f. of non- structural hardcover within the U-75 ’ setback area and 636 s.f. of non-structural hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback area. Total hardcover removal is proposed at 858 s.f. consisting of flat stone patio and brick patio area, asphalt driveway, parking area to east side of garage and concrete sidewalk. The applicant advises it was impossible to remove the flat stone walkways along the west side of the residence as they help to stabilize the groundcover where surface drainage runs between house and lot line to lake from tlic City culvert that outlets at the northwest corner of the property. Drainage from road and surrounding watershed drains directly onto this property. The existing 18’ x 9’ garage stall is inadequate to house a large*- size vehicle. The addition would allow applicant to store his car within the garage. Statement of Hardship Please review Exhibit A. Applicant notes setback of existing garage and sharp drop m elevations to rear of 18’ wide garage. Both additions meet the required 10 ’ side yard. The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent neighbors who were advised of the improvements. uoujuKaiibu&aiuiaaaitiKiii Zoning File #1873 September 16, 1993 Page 3 Issues for Consideration 1. 2. What other hardcover improvements can be considered for removal? Can an addition be made to this garage minimizing the intensity of the setback variance? Applicant had originally planned a storage addition to the upper level garage at the east side. 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Any recommendation for removal must include the condition that hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to footing/foundation inspection for new construction. ^;S7^ - CITY OP ORONO “ VARIANCE APPLICATIO|j^[^ Initial Application Fee(^75.00 . ($50.00 per each additional'variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) . I«••>/ ^ t.. » * V w • .. W * * J w - w m m . • ' .• . -W • * V PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address d)k//'— /JlOu/J 5'S3(’^ Property Identif. Number (P.I .D. ) , ^ '?Z. —-^_L—^ ^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_ _^^ // • ^_(month/year) I (do)('ao1ii^ also own the^adjacent parcels of land.^ Present use of property; residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District; ________________________ APPLICANT Naune /Vl/c ’£ckoAycj^ Phone (home) “3^/^ Phone (worlc) 3^^^ Address; I3j0 titCif City; /V0U/^<L- - - Zip; flj/l/ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (wor)c) Address:City;Zip: Cost $ 000 * ^DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Describe request in detail: MA.', iiOAJ ~h_ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage X' Setbac)c:Front Side X Rear ___ Average La)ceshore Other (specify) HARDSBIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property yiti^^s P^^i^^co.plian^>.^ fviAri ks>ftA — ^AS AXl5-4‘iAJt un^-----rAa/«1 f>rdf>^rfy Drap DAcnA)jnfD^V" fpUPf (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 'Completed Application Form _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271) . 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8>s"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8Jj"xll"). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of 8. any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowrfed^^s and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. $1 13Owner's Signature.Date Applicant must hQve alA submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commissibn—Mating. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I mJN DATC M/27/nMTCH OOA# *i’;PROP AOOROMNIR NAME ' TAXPAYER ! HAHE/ADDR 58 07-117-25 31 0007 0A515 NORTH SHORE DR M J RICELMOF ETAL H J RIGELHOF A515 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND MN 5536A »A ■ ' '^ PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER ' NAME/ADOR .V ;■ • 58 07-117-25 51 0018 01520 REST POINT CIR PATRICK RAY JURGENS PATRICK JURGENS 1520 REST POINT CIR MOUND MN 5556A PROP AOOR ONNER NAME . f TAXPAYER f NAME/ADOR ‘if’. • 58 07-117-23 31 0021 01540 REST POINT CIR JACK EONAROS KUTZ JACK EONAROS KUTZ 1540 REST POINT CIR MOUND MN 55364 ..’•r PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR :■ ii. 58 07-117-25 31 0024 01350 REST POINT CIR RICHARD I. ANFINSON RICHARD L ANFINSON 1550 REST POINT CIR MOUND MN 55364 f, '.f ■ iiV-4 •• I' -C vv -V' , :K ‘.vs: ' ■ ■ v. > '..• •* '•>' :.v:—V . • • •• : I •!. . •/.j;'/ rv*.; O rv*.; •: 5c > ^ ■‘U ‘ o ^».V." r 4 * ■ O ' 'i.: • ‘Jv . .1 ‘ * V ft « * • t .jU^. HEMrtPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IHTORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PACE P1A55A011038 07-117-25 51 001601367 REST POINT CIR H E PINEGAR t R A PINEGAR HILLIAH A REBECCA PINEGAR 1547 REST POINT CIR HOUND MN 55364 30 07-117-23 31 001701337 REST POINT CIR STEVEN H BECRAFT STEVEN M BECRAFT 1337 REST POINT CIR MOUNO Mt4 55364 i 38 07-117-23 31 0019 04545 NORTH SHORE OR HAROLD L ALBRECHT ETAL HAROLD L ALBRECHT 4545 NO SHORE OR MOUNO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0020 01536 REST POINT CIR JANICE K OE MATTEO JANICE K OE MATTEO 1336 REST POINT CIRCLE M0UI4D MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0022 01342 REST POINT CIR J R A J K TAYLOR J R TAYLOR A J K TAYLOR 1342 REST POINF CIR MOUNO rt4 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0023 01348 REST POINT CIR K A D HAMKir4S0N KEITH 0 A DONNA M HANKINSON 1548 REST POINT CIR MOUr>IO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0031 01360 REST POINT CIR 0 A J BOIES JR DAVID D A JENNIFER BOIES JR 1360 REST POINT CIRCLE MOUNO MN 55364 m TOTAL BATCH 004 00011 . r » ^ •■f 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATI0(4 OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST ( OF MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF, DATE F. i 'Md-dL. o r) 1 o 4 T) " •• Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we)Atv\eG I 1399^ lh>i- feifOt dird e [print address[print name (s)] have reviewed the plane for the proposed improveir.ent or proposed use of the property located at iRe^f k-f-f also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgenent, I ^ (are) not as).ed to declare aoproval or disapproval of the property or u but merely to confirm for the City Council / ‘”®^,;\^"j®’ot“or”use the improvement p*ans and that the proposed neighbor s projeo- requi^^s Council approval. 0,r A.„ Date Date I (we) Cl^h;<• ^ "/f [print name(s). **..****.*♦************************/** of /^-3a? Pfd- Gi>g fe [print address] a eh. nlans for the orODOsed imorovement or proposed use of the pr^^erTyTocated at /?vn M, also referred to as Land Use Application No I (we) understand that in executing this °"l®^5®";"VrtVor ^ (are) "Ot asked to declare-app^ th^ rmrr=vem°enr/l":s ‘a°nd ‘th%t tL proposed neighbor's project or use raquiras Council approval. Date Property Owner Date If you have any f “bli^ you^LmmL^'" to^"th\*'Bui Iding t zonrng*0«ii; a^leas^ 10 da"ys prior to the s_^edul^ meete^ date., ' it o 1 \ Ptt) Po S«’d I - - \ -{ ; 1 1 T \ 1 • f ■ *1"1 • mmm • % m n~ “! -* t * ' ! ........ i I— w* __1 !_4i ]\ . ' 1! 1 1 i 1 ! i I I 13^0 ed«3ftV-cl £. ^Pes+ Z'ycle i-c wtv At?t'i''/ r-r-'„r a^'■ T' 0^r •11— 1 i *ni>^r y t r '■ I ' I ! /ti r - I £ -r/} Hm yQ ; . : . J. I . I --, 1 I • ! I I i •■ • I ! ■ : t i - 1 I t •-1*1 I' '1‘T I ! r - I i t U Jj:! i ] i .yVfVTK I ! •. V <• •>f). Pn)fb5«d I f ■> tt IZ 5. ! I ' I i ► . -• f » I ! r ; K A A. f. . 1 . W .. i ^♦ 1 > T f\tKI3VO (h'l/Ui dl'^dtI /3YO fbldlf t!\rcl(T 'k / ■Xr% w ule-o otei^ "te u;eto -to # ■* '. r •• CERTIFIC ai 1: OF SURVEY FOR JACK EDWARDS L^\ s.': . • "V «i \K\^^ 0 : Denotes Iron msriier set • : Denotes Iron Oc>rJier found All bearings are based upon an assumed datuta v> LEGAL 0ESCR!r*TI0N OF PREMISIS SURVEYED: Lot 9. and the southueslerIy half of lot 8. Also the northeasterl) half of the vacated public access aijolnlng said lot 9,Rest Point Park. *Ms survey Intends to show the location of an existing shed, gar ago .< house. and the location of all visible hardcover thereon. It does not purport to 5ho«« an/ other lup-ovements or cncroachTients. i \tk* KlMsur.PAII MViinrik»w COFHN & GRONBERG, INC. W* Ci»Mi//fn^/Myv f>, IjWiI Silt riifnni r< ’ 4H2 T.inuf.uk Awiuh* •'t.tmg I iko. M\ tiDi,. ■, . IhttiK u'Mih iK jIIIu * wifkiv HJ\ I’M pjird In mr «w unJff Bi> Ju»<lvjprl- tkVM>n andtiuilamjdulyn-jCiUrirdLiiJInninertandLandS^mryuvunJr* Ihv llw' I'l l‘'r i»l Mmhh’v'U Klaik S C.r(u.UfK Altiin«viU Lxrnyr .\umlwr II7U n»r VC Ait ilAlt ‘ HMNkX 93‘368 § 00 00 =fe AOC CPi^AQOS^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)(f 0-7^1^75-250 Existing Hardcover in Zone 250-500^ 5CO-IOOO' "on'eV/Al^ • • A. H ouse ’ • x ••• • • • •« •«•• • •••••» S • F ■ LENGTH WIDTH X s #SiFi ss 2 7 • • S.Ft X S.Fi X 1 S.F. B.Garage _ x ,• • S.Fi c.Driveway . • x •s . S.F. X a • • • -• • S.F. D.S idewalk lb ^ 2.30 S,p, X 0 f - • • It* . S.F. « 1 X a • S.F. E. Gftiot pp-ra Yfii^ 5«rA (42. • ■f^ ^ Aj5vw<n-t./ S.F. F.Landscape '^*'0 O'12 S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . X a • S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X . • < S.F. ^ ® 2.5?' P/4, =.fe(i> •• S.F. G. Other x ..• S.F. V • • Total H ardcover in Zone * - '• • *3.f; fT] ....... . •• Total Property A rea in Zone S.F. b] 3^B (H3 0 X 100 . 4-.^^ % iMi Mitt J. , * ta« HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 250-500' 500-1000'- Existing Hardcover in Zone H A. House l^4C S • F < . < - LENGTH WIDTH ^ -Ti|F5 6UAU5 - rrP^T t 5 >4 ft 74 /jC>5 i^r L L e'Tiyii, 5n^A/c5 <^Z B. Garage 447 c. D riveway /<!?74 D. Sidewalk -fWh^fOrJC U/AicKf walk ^ . X ^11 ^r.46c? • i ^/»<2 a4£<: Ratio/ ~ ^ “ (4r^S*^gy /INCL 60 . 67e F.Landscape AREAS C/lV£ lAJ FP^T~ = Qvic //-^ ft //I 22^ G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone # Total Property A rea in Zone /X 770 S.F, S.F. S.F. • f M- iC . Liv r*-*/ S.F. S.F. - S.F.’ S.F. S.F. • * m t • f»# , S.F. S.F. C(f- S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. . I S.F. • • s.f; S.P S.F.S • • 5^66 B /7. 77 0 X 100 - ^ s iVI V 4a.u2l ^ f-V ^y'? j ''"«r '^■■iriS| 0ACiC CPdcZ/^po^^-2r-?y HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE one )(^0~7S^75-250* 250-500' Existing Hardcover in Zone ( 500-1000' • • A . H ouse , ' • x ••• • • • •« • • • • • tt« »SiF. ■ LENGTH WIDTH X s #S.Fi ‘^HEO y63/-4-.3 27 • • S.Fi X S.F. X S.F. 3.Garage .............. x .a S.F. C.D riveway _ • x ■a • * S,P,. X •f • .• • S.F. D.Sidewalk ; x 2.30 'f'o 6^ .IJnn.' , 1 * X •, • • M» . , S.F. • • X 1 ' S.F. E. 6(?lOX. f^T0 *BV 6Bfir)l‘9^"fri /LOvvOva*/ S.F. F.Landscape "12 S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN EY . X • S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X ss • 1 S.F. ‘^n7A/c5 34 (2 2.5f' p/4, C . • *. S. F. G. Other x • S.F. • • Total H ardcover in Zone ’ - ’ Total Property A rea in Zone •■.346 ““ • *s.f; j A ] ........ S.F. b1 3'^B 6<?30 X 100. % r °'^'^a t* , • / *"c?r ^<>0. ^ <To ^O;. ^/c <^S / ^„ <?Cr J'^'» V '. > p 1? • ^# • •^9 4 •.,* ^ ■ j« « .• .‘X ••••<»'*■*►'! .%■*►♦. •* f "9 . ■* J •'/,' W?V. .al^e Minnetonka. ■ .. <>.7j, '*Pp 'o? ., '^c ^ /> «’i, 0/"f » V .« y/-/ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MR. & MRS. IRWIN JACOBS C/O JENSEN HOMES IN GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 A 2. SECTION 10-117-23. AND LOT 2. BLOCK 1. MILLSTON HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA •V- ‘ f u. t ■ -y 1 r uam___________ na*.. iraMnM Uh 1 ■< I i. Ma M. i. TMM. I IT iTtav O .M ta —----------------------,, €r>Mri La.. kHM Ilai a< mab «• «Mif^ a< ito* iraa aa*r >aa ■ «. a« ^ iTiaa la. a« tnwiiifiaia Wa<U.a<1Waa»a.iaa;*aiiMt*a».waal» >»ain i.<3n.a l.aill.t. iiii>irt| la«f>»Mia.^ kaa (M Na^ liaar. ttaa MlaaMr *a aMr li»a a .aa aMnMia aa4 a*n% Na a4r^M<^ tna *• aa Ua aatf La I. laa aa« a< nala ■ ■ ta> ■ ■ MatMatr «naia U4.t aa< a iMi a a pa. aM a IM . »a aa ate aaa te> aaM La 1 a. a te w tea Mt tel ate ate ate la. aaa. La 1. H.a a «Ite paaM ate aa teaa IMI tel ate ta te aai la aia. La 2.101* tel aa a tei. a te ate tea atte. Mteatea tea. .aalp teaa *»tei«lteaaateLte.Maaateiatepte.atepM^ aate^ate ALSO La 2. Mak I. MUirON. aatete a te aaaM pla teiaC Ita aap teate a tea te bateaa ate tea. teaitei pnpaiy. ad te la.a aaatep'Mate'a te T5-2M tel ateak aa tea Iteaa Lte. k da a papa a tea .a tea iM I n aite a aaahate Ik^ fai»lte«iteite«tepntendkra aaatete *Mi apavWai. ad *■ I ■ . dt«r tegteaal CMI ad late Saapa ate te laa ate SM. a CM»«< tete. itete-MM —>: telMk^tetedte*-”-** Oc^ai/ scale r-30' COFFIN & QRONBERG, INC. ENGINEERS. LAND SURVEYORS AND PLANNBW LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA *t*