The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About#5926 - lot area variance -replaces #1557 1 . �oo %� � . _ � , +%°� Doc No T4755964 _ ° � ' '`"" � J� Certified, filed and/or recorded on 5/20/10 4:30 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles Jill L. Alverson, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 55 Pkg I D 627124 Doc Name: Resolution Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs New Certs 1005617 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. I � � '' . ` � � U (� `S_� �� A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT EiREA VARIANCE FOR RECORD LOT NO. 9 PURSUANT TO ORONO CODE SECTION 78-563 � O� O � '�� C ITY of ORONO aa z_ � -�' ; '�'r � .'�� ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �L`9kEsi'i�g'�G NO. � 9 2 6 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT AREA VARIANCE FOR RECORD LOT NO. 9 PliRSUAIV'T TO ORONO CODE SECTION 78-�63 WHEREAS, the followin� propert}�, also known as 700 Bi� lsland or Record Lot No. 9, is situated on Bi�, Island and is zoned RS Seasonal RecreationaL PARCEL [D NO. 2?-117-23-34-0008(Torrens) That part of Government Lot 6, Section 22, Township 1 17 North, Ran�e 2� West described as foflows: Beginnin�at the intersection of the South line estended of Lot H, Recreation Point(now vacated) with the shore line of Lake Minnetonka: thence Southerly along said shore line to its intersection with the Southerly line e�tended of Lot A, said Recreation Point(now vacated); thence Northeasterly throu<_h a point marked with a Judicial Monument, distant 149 feet from the Southeast corner of said Lot A along the Southerly line thereof to the Southeast corner of said Lot, which corner is marked bv a Judicial Monumenr, thence Nor[heasterlv in a strai�ht line to the Southwest corner of Lot V,said Addition (now vacated) which comer is marked by a Judicial Monumenr. thence Northeasterly alona the Southerlv line of said Lot V to the Southeast corner of said Lot; thence North alon�,Che East (ine of Lots V and U of said Recreation Point (now vacated)to the Southeast corner of Lot T, said Addition, which corner is marked by a Judicial Monument; thence V�'esterly alon<,the South line of said Lot T to the South�ti�esterly corner thereof. which corner is marked with a Judicial Monument; thence Northwesterly in a straiaht line to the Southeast corner of Lot H, said Addition, w�hich corner is marked with a Judicial Monument: thence Northwesterl} alon�the Southerly line of said Lot H throu�h a point marked with a Judicial Monument distant 16� feet from said Southeast corner of said Lot H to point of beginnin��; and. PARCEL ID NO. 22-117-23-24-0006(Torrens) Lots 27, ?8. ?9, 30. 31 and 32 inclusive, Pleasant View. Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Southwest corner and the Southeast corner of said Lot 27 and the Northwest corner of said Lot 32, are marked by Judicial Monuments and; WHEREAS, ii� adoptin�the RS Seasonal Recreatioi� zonin�� district re,ulations the City Council reviewed o��nership, development and use patterns on Bi; [sland�and determined that all the above described propert}' combined is and shal( hereinafter and henceforth be one "Record Lot'' as defined b} Orono Code Section 78-�68; and WHEREAS, an application was filed for a lot area varia��ce as outlined in Orono Code Section 78-�63(a)(2); and �'HEREAS, on September 26`'', 1983 the City� Council adopted Resolution No. ]��7 �rantin� a lot area variance. Pa�e 1 of 2 � o� o ��, o aa,:- CITY of ORONO � -�� ::�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL G 0 L�kES�I�4� NO. � � � � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, l�7innesota: FINDINGS 1. City Staff did not record Resolution No. 1557 in the chain of title. No reason can be found for this failure to follow standard procedure. � 2. Resolution No. 15�7 cannot be recorded because the property owner in 1983 no longer owns the properry and there are other errors in the document. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIO:�'S Based upon the above findings, the Orono Ciry Council hereby affirms the area vari�nce granted b_v Resolution No. 1557. This variance remains subject to the following conditions: l. This Record Lot including all the above described property shall hencefarth be continued in common ownership by the same person or persons even if recorded as separate lots or tax parcels, and it shall not be subdivided, sold in parts, reduced in area or otherwise separated without approval of a subdivision by the City. This condition shall not preclude future sale or transfer of the complete Record Lot as a single unit or the merging by tax parcel combination of this Record Lot with one or more other Recard Lots as long as the merging results in a reduction in the number of Record Lots. 2. Grantin� this variance means this Record Lot may be used for one-family seasonal r,�creat:oral use -.��t�-iou� a structure or tne ex;s�iilb dweilir,g may be used, improved, enlarged, or replaced without requiring further City Council re��iew of lot size, but subject to compliance with all building permit, setback, hardcover, on-site sewage treatment and other performance standards for development in the RS District. This resolution replaces Resolution No. 1557. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of April, 2010. ATTEST: _�, ,:�:��.- ,� ��---z� - a.{k"�i l�( �'� �1�_ Lmda S. Vee, City Clerk � Jan s M. White, Mayar Page 2 of 2 • � STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The undersigned, being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Orono, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at the meeting of the Orono City Council on April 12, 2010, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this 19t" day of April , 2010. �� ,'„ � �2��•.� � C�.�__. 4. ,1� b , `;,:�*�,' , ' � ,' City Clerk �= ` (seal)�� a �: ,. 1 1� �y 4!; i fiy ¢ M~ �! � J . ,�,+�B I y.4 �'J� e:. ; I �' �: -� h �� A �T'��_. M 9 a Y `� 1� 1 7 ��t r '. ��,x�`�,.�4. , .. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,April 12, 2010 7:00 o'clock p.m. PL NING DEPARTMENT REPORT *5. #0 381 BARRY TANNER,3435 SHORELINE DRIVE (NAVARRE L ES)- CON IONAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION-RESOLUTION 1�T0 25 Murphy moved, Bre seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 592 a Resolution Amending Resolution No. 5803, 3435 Shoreline ive. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 6. CITY OF ORONO-C GES TO CHAPTER 7 , CONSTRUCTION OF SITE RUNOFF CONTROL-ORDINANCE O. 69,THIRD S ES McMillan noted the last sentence in Section 3, , states that costs in excess of the amount of the security may be assessed to the property as special asse me s. McMillan commented that]anguage is a little confusing given the section it is located in and sugge d that the age be moved to Section 5. Turner indicated she would make t change. McMillan moved,Breme seconded,to adopt ORDINAI��CE NO. 69, ird Series, an Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the Orono City Code Concerning Construction ' e Runoff Control,with the last sentence in Secti 3 being moved to Section 5, and to Adopt SUMMARY O RDINANCE NO. 69, THIRD SE S, an Ordinance Revising Chapter 79 of the Orono City Code Con uction Site Runoff Contr . VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. *7. 700 BIG ISLAND-RESOLUTION REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 1557-RESOLUTION NO. 5926 Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5926, a Resolution Approving a Lot Area Variance for Record Lot No. 9, Pursuant to Orono Code Section 78-563. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Murphy asked what is happening with NAPA. White stated the owner of the building has decided to raise the tenant rates and that NAPA will be relocating to Spring Park. Murphy noted that Doug Franchot will be attending the April Planning Commission meeting in his place. Franchot stated the LMCC wi11 be moving to the next stage regarding fiber optic, which is to reach out and communicate with the city administrators and mayors about the funding necessary for a full-scale plan. Franchot noted$1.4 million will be required to create a development plan. The LMCC will then go out and sell the bonds to construct the project. Murphy asked whether the project would be eligible for stimulus funds. Franchot indicated it would not be. ---------------------------------__---___.._..._------ Page 12 of 15 --__--- _ __..._-