Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-19-1993 Planning PacketC
r HINUTBS or THE 0*0110 PLANlfllfG COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 19, 1993 fiOLL Th« Orono Planninq ConulsKion »#t on th« abov# data with tha following raabars prasant: Chair Charlaa Schroadar. Staphan Pataraon, Caiulara Mowiatta, Sandra Smith, and Janica Barg. Dala Lindquist arrived at 7:34 p.m. Charlaa Nolan. Jr. was absent. The following rapiasantad the City Staff: Zonin? Administrator Jaanna Mabusth, and Recorder Tan Naab. Edward Callahan and J. Diann Goatten were present. Chair Schroadar called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (•U •1829 DIAMK STIFF, 1080 W^LDHURST TRAIL - VA8IANCKS - PUBLIC HIARTHG 7:00 - 7:22 P.H. The Affidavit of Publication ard Certificate of Mailing were noted. Diana Sieff was prasant. Mabusth explained the applicant requests approval of an after-the- fact hardcover variai » for the repair of an existing deck, and an expansion to the dock at the northeast corner from 6x20' to 14x20'. All improvements meet required setbacks. The applicant proposes the removal of an existing shed located in the 0-75’ setback zone, reducing hardcover from 2.3% to 0%, and 68 s.f. of concrete slab in the 75-250’ zone. There it a 92 s.f. increase of hardcover in the 75-250' zone. Smith questioned if the removal of the "oncrete pad near the detached garage, the walkway around the attached garage, and the rock by the northern drive would be possible. Sieff explained the rock was just left over and dumped directly on the grass but serves no purpose. The walk is used for the service door from the garage and also is needed to reduce erosion problems. Peterson inquired about the history of the property. Mabusth explained a variance application was approved in 1979 for the detached garage. All improvements proposed with this application ware completed in 1991. •jfilette asked if both drives were necessary. She felt the southern drive was difficult to exit the property from because of the lip on the road. p HliUTRS OP THP OPORO VtAimiWO CORMISRIOII tfPlTIIIO HELD JULY \9, 1993 XOaiRd ilLi #1829 - COllf. Si«ff stated during th« wint«r, th# aoutharn drlv# it tht only acctts frot th« proptrty. A^no th« rieighbcrina property usts it for tccttt. Th« lip on road wac inatalltd by tha City to halp dirtcl drainage. She oilerad to ra»ove the plastic under the flower beds on the lakeside of tt«e residence. Rowlette felt t^o driveways were not necessary and asked the applicant to consider nore aggressive resKivals of hardcover. She pointed cut existing 75-290* hardcover IS 39.51 and proposed Is 39.91. Schroeder noted the City issued a Stop Work Order in February lor this project. Nabusth advised a **Stop Work Order** waa never issued as decks were already repaired The Inspectors observed the new construction when visiting a neighboring property. Letters were sent to the applicant advising of the need for s building pernit. Sifeff stated she was notified oi for a perait after the const.^^uction was finished. Peterson inquired about the square footage of the walkway. Habusth said it is apiroxlaately 3*x 25*. Sieff asked that the application be tabled to allow her time to review possible hardcover reeovals. It was soved by Ssith, seconded by Kowlette, to table Application il829 for Diane Sieff, 1080 Wildhurst Trail, to allow the applicant tine to reconsider additional hardcover resovals <=4nc submit her best efforts to the City. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•2) tl840 JTH TAYLOR, 1342 REST POIHI CIRCLE - VABIAKCB - PUBLIC HKARIMG 7:22 - 7:41 P.H. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Taylor were present Habusth explained the applicant proposes the installation of a connecting walkway to an existing deck, requiring a 3’ setback variance. Hardcover is currently at 51.8% and proposed at 52.6% in the 75-250' zone. She questioned whether the walk is proposed over natural ground cover or non-hordcovered surface. i 1 NIIIUTI8 OF TUI 080P0 PLAKHTfi^ COiOitSSlOII NtETIKG Hlt^ JUif 19. 1993 SOPIHG rUf 11840 - COfIT Lindquist arrived st this tiM Taylor statsd th« last 0 to 9* n««r th« hour# mil bo locstod undor an axiAting «avo, whirh mil covor that poi. lon of the entire eellc. Ua explained hie need for the vslk for access to the house opposed to using wtMi steps Habusth noted the esvea hsdl not been included in hardcover calculations so the eslkuay would be included as new hardcover. iSchroeder noted Mrs. Taylor had indicated the potential exists to reeove a portion of the brick patio and the c<ncrete slab. Taylor stated he would prefer not to have to do so leaediately, but It IS his intent to reduce the brick patio to install draintile and would be willing to reeove the slab. Mabusth stated the walkway la necessary to provide a safer access to the residence. Peterson asked about consents fros the neighbors. Iiabusth stated there were no cossenta. Snith asked if there was a chanc# to tnprove the appearance of the rock drive. Taylor said it is his intsnt to do so. « ith questioned the existence of the porch near the lakeshore. iHabusth explained the City approved the improvcnent of this structure in 1990 with the condition that it could not be converted to living space ar.d rldfflbinq could not be P’^ovided. Rowlett© suggested rtaff brief the applicant on the conditions related to this structure on the property. It was Boved by Schroeder, seconded by Berg, to recomnend approval of Application S1840 for Jis Ta/lor, 1342 Rest Point Circle, for a side setback variance to allow the installation of a walkway to the existing deck, conditioned upon the resoval of bOl or more of the biick patio by August 31, 1993 and removal of the concrete slab by September 30, 1993. Ayes 6, nays 0. 4 ml jiM: Ki. K HIWTIS Of TUI 0*0«0 fLAIiaillG COKKItSIOR llttTISG lEID JOLT I»f3 (13) flt41 VILtIftJI i LOtf COItWILKiS. 960 TOIfTAMA tOAO - VAIIAHCM - PUALIC aiAllira 7:41 • t:39 f.». Th« Af(i3«vit of fublication «n4 Cortificato cf Halliikf w#r« notod. Mr. and Mrs. CorcMlius, Stovai Longvan, applicants' buildar. and David Riddlar, fotnar ounar. war* praaant. Habustn Dotad tb« City approved an avataga lakashora aatback tor a n#M rasidanca and a pool at ttMi and of 1992. At that tico tha survay indic^tad a loop driva locatad out of tha 0-75* sons. Hovavar. a portion of ttia dtivo is locatad within tha 0-75* satbacic araa at 1,200 s.f. hardcovar. Tha applicants advisad that portion of tha driva had axistad on tha ptoparty for yaars. Tha applicants claiB to ralocate tha driva on tha proparty would aaan tha loss of aatura traas Tha applicants propose tha drainage to run away fron tha laha draining to tha wast and avantually to tha aatsh. Longaan axplainad tha surveyor originally locatad tha driva ou the survay but latar raalixad it was within tha 0-75* sons and changed tha location without notification to tha buildar or ownar. Ha raitaratad tha loss of 6 to 6 nature hardwood trees if tha driva ware to be relocated. Ha pointad out they ara not adding additional hardcover in tha 0-75* zone, but aaraly using tha existing hardcovsr for tha drive. Paterson stated ha dees not have a problaa with tha drive, but does have a problaa with tha 12** culvert coaing froa tha neighboring property to tha aout.n across tha Cornelius property and dumping into tha lake. Ha asked if there ware a way to filter tha groundwater. Longaan stated they intend to extend the culvert under the drive and direct drainage to tha natural swala/aarsh area to tha northwest of tha drive. Mabusth asked about a retention araa to tha south of tha drive. Longman stated that was not their intent, and tha natural drainage pattern flows to the aarsh area. He stated the culvert has been in place since approxiaately 1920. He added tha Lauer property does not appear to be adding to the run-off. He stated it is their goal to grade the property so there is not water standing on the south side of the drive, but they are open to suggestions. Cornelius stated there has not been water flowing out of the culvert during this wet season. i i f«TiniTC!s or m otoito rLAmtufc coioiissioei »siriso iilLO JULY i9. 199J loiiffo riLB iiMi - cent. n«v«r • prok>lMi ia this ir^a in ttM past and tiM asM aiiaJ culvsrt has ba«n th«ra for a^ny yaars. Saitli atatad in an affort to radxica hardcover in tha 0~75* aona aha would l:Ka thaa to conaidar ralocat ir.9 tha driva through an existing cpaning in tha itoodad area trar^hy reducing traa laxoval. Longaart stated this ic not feasible t>acausa of tha following: the curve would be too narrow to aanaevar. they would lose nature traas and tha slope would b« in axcaas of what tha coda allows. Mrs. Cornalius raaindad than that they could have aubdividad the pr'^rty andi than thara would ba avan aora hardcovar than praaantIV. Kowletta statad aha Naa a difficult tiaa approving this whan tha pravioua two applicints vwra aakad to raaova ill hardcover in the 0-75* son#. She at«t^ ah# would never have voted in favor of tha original application knowing tha location of tha proposed drive. She ravenbarad visiting the property during that application procaaa and atated she did not sea tha axiating driva in tha 0-75)* zona. tiddler stated tha drive had been thara tor many years, tow latte asked if it was located on the survey. Habusth statad tha survey did net locate that portion of the ativa as It was intended to ba raaovad with tha total redavalopaant of the property. Longaan noted Bruce Vang, tha City Inspector, did locate tha existing drive on aerial photoa. Schroadar called fot a recess rr*'a 8:0^ to 8:15 p.a. Mabusth pointed out the aerial photos indicate two driveways from the property. The property owner indicated he used the Icop portion of the drive for maintenance of the property near the lake, but the portion connecting the loop and the exit to the road was never used and became overgrown. Schroeder clarified that there never was a loop connection between the two drives as currently proposed. Riddler concurred. IfTfUmnS OF THF OtOliO FLAimillG CCNIilIS8in]| HELD JULY 19. Iff3 tmmo fiLi §1841 - cQjif. Lon4tt4n •t4it«4 tfith th« propo>s*4 4rlv«. th# ccnn«rtiem !• He reiterated the hardcover in this tone i« ex^atind hardcover. Ke stated It has leptcted the lake in the pa«t the sane as it will in the future. iowlette stated it is their dut? to isprove rur.-cff to the lake. She fell ther needed note inforsation on the drtinaue issue. Nr. Cornelius stated there is very little run-off presently, ind it will all drain to the sarsh area on the property. He pointed cut the loss of sature trees cill only negatively lepsct the run-off situation. Ke subeitted letters of support tiom neighboringt property owners. Schroeder read the letters froa Janes Gilbert and Graydon HcCulley. It was K)ved by Peterson seconded by Lindquist, to reconnend approval of Application S1641 for Uilliaa and Lori Cornelius, 960 Tonkawa Poad, for hardcover and sstback varian'~es to construct a portion of the drive in the 0-'^5’ aone, subject to the City Engineer approving the drainage plan with the extended culvert and! analysis ot the landscape plan around the front of the house and no expansion of the existing drive in this area. Rowlette stated she is disappointed with the after-the-fact request and reiterated she would never have voted in favor of the original application had she known this, but would vote in favor at this tiee to preserve the trees. Ssith stated she is disappointed that the applicants art willing to consider alternatives. Hr. Cornelius stated they did review all t.'^e options. not ■ JT m Vote: Ayes 6, nays 0. <•4^ 11842 fOM iHOHBl, 760 iBOwH HOAO SOUTH - VARIANCES PUBLIC HBARING 8:39 TO 9:05 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Hs. ani Mrs. Browne were present. 1 fflUUTIS OF TUB OBOHO PLAKIfllia CONNISSIOil MBITIBG HILO JtLf If#. I9f3 tOHlflC: fILl #l84a - COBf. Nabuath •iplauvBd «ine« th« adoptloa of tha ahoraland raoulationa. th« Matland 4r«« haa baan raolaaaif lad aa a racraatvonal davalopaant. laica and atrurturaa puat aa«t a 100* aatback. Sha raviavad tn# lapact of tba tajulationa on tha building anvalopa for thia propertf. Tha applicant propoaea ancloaing an uppar laval dark, a actaan porch on an axialing dack with an addition to ona ccrnar. and an additional connacting dack area tc tha aouth with tha laatallation of a pool and deck, araa Habuath pointaJ out they at a allowad to have non-atruciural hardcover in tha 75-100' lona. Tha OHIi'a atructura setback for thia area la 100'. Tha DRR haa axpraaaad concern about the additions of structure toward the lake and racoaeends the following: no new construction extending lakaward. tha raaoval of tha basketball court, and that applicant aaintaina the existing natural vegetation on the lar.eshore bank Nr. Irowna stated thalr priury concern is tha protection of thair septic aystea and the aarah area Saith stated aha does not have a problaa with the screened portion to the existing dack. but does not agree with the addition of the pool and would like the basketball court to be reaoved. Nr. Browne stated the court is used by then children to ride bikes on as their drive slopes to tha busy County road. He asked if they are suggesting ha reaova tna court in exchange tor the pool? He fait there would not be enough araa on tha property for the pool if It had to be Located outside t^e 100* setback. Rowlatte stated aha would like to sea a condition that tha court would not be rapiacad in the future if repairs were necessary. It was aoved by Rowlette, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval of Application #1642 lor Ton Browne. '‘60 Brown Road South, for variances to enclose the upper level deck, and screen porch on the lower deck extending nc closer to Tanager Lake and the expansion of the lower deck aa shown, and denial of the •'equeat for a pool and deck addition subject to tha condition that the concrete slab may not be repaired and must be removed in the future when major repairs are deemed necesaary. Ayes 6, nays 0. A Vv. i BIHUfES Op THl OKmO PlAinifiro C0imTS8t0]l MTiriHO RILII JULf 19, Iff I |f5l 11843 SOlIRT 8 JOAH SUKS8. 2ffO KATUTOUI ROAO - SriTCR FUI1I/8UBOIVISIOII M7. Harii Gront>«r« and lari fitchar »«ra ptaaant. Habuath explained this is a 8 lot subliviaion, ol which Lota S and 6 do not Boat th# ro<tuirod lot width Staff racosNMnda axtanaion of tha road to the wastorn boundary of tna proparty to provide for 9 future connection to Ooidanview Drive, with th* developeant of a teeporary cul>da-aac in tha tntaria. Drainada on this property la a eajor issua Currently eaioi portions of tha property drama to the northeast and through the HacItPerry Hill neighborhc^. During the review of tha pravioua 3 lot subdivision, the applicant proposed a ratertion pond to the north. In the current review, the Engineer has suggested directing drainage to the south to Uatettown Road, which does not have drainage ditches to carry the run-off. Gronberg noted because of the neighbors* concerns tc the east, the existing tree buffer was left and the drainage swale was moved further to the west creating s larger than averdge drainage easeeent. He questioned if this area would be deducted troe the dry buildabie on those lots and telt that wjuld be a hardship. He questioned the purpose of the connection of the road to Ooldenview Drive. Mabusth replied this would be a part of the network of roadways. The City IS trying to connect the interior roads in the City. Lindquist questioned where the pond on Lot 8 will drain. Suess stated it currently dtains to the northeast. He added if the road were required to be extended, it would destroy on# of his lots and one of the possible lots on the Hal Ison property. He noted Mr. Kallson has slieady paid for a road. Goldenview Drive, and did not feel he would like to pay for anoiher. Mabusth noted that access can stil.^ be from Ooldenview Drive, but that access corridor to be platted at the time of a future subdivision would only be developed at the time the City found a need to develop through roads. Peterson asked about the septic sites. Mabusth noted two lots have been tested satisfactorily, and they do not anticipate any problems with the remainder of the lots. t 8 flTIfUTBS OF THB OBOKO FLAIIlflllO C REL& mY 19. IffJ •n:tsstoil RBSTIliO lOilllO PUB fl843 - coif. 8IMBB pointiHl cut hit hOMttttd hit cxittcd or; thit property tlnct th« late lOOOt H« taid the draina?* ittu* thould havt b#«n corractad with the dayalopaant of tha Htcitbarrr naighPornood and ha fait ha thould act be tolaly ratpoaaibla for tha corraction of tha drainaqa probiea. Mabuttb ttatad parhapa thara it aa opportunity to uorhi uith tha naighbora to tha aaat to craata « joint drainaqa aataMht. Lirdquiat quattionad tha naad for tha road. labusth axulainad that tha interior roadt ara all privata roada until connected, at «hich point tha City will taKa ovar aaintananca. Littdquitt atkad if iott hava baan platted on tlw Hallton property to tea Mhara the boundariaa could go. Mabuath noted the northern Hallaoo lot at 4^ acrat has not bean platted aa yet. Fischer stated tha rasidanta want the private road to deter public traffic. Fowlatta stated the accasa nay be very valuabla thould Highway 12 bo ralocarad to tne touthatn corridor. She auggaatad ataff confirt tha ability of Hallaon to divide nia property it the road were to be located acroaa hia c*^opeity. IHabusth stated they will be requiring drainage infornation with the filing of the pialxainary plat to daternine the impact on the dry buildable area. She noted the new development cannot send drainage at a greater velocity to property to the east than property emits at undeveloped conditions. She felt the Hailson property could be subdivided into two parcels even with all or part of a future road extension. Peterson felt they should allow tne cul-de-sac and not require the extension of the road. Mabuath stated even if the Hailson property ware divided, the road would not necessarily be constructed as the property is served by Ooldenview. No action was taken. i J :>•>4 NIlfUTES or THV OtORO FLARIItllC COMIUSSinif ffSITIRO UILD JULY 19. 1993 (i^l eiPOfif If PLAIBIBO COCNISSlOP lirRlSnTATlVK P9t«rson t«port*d CounciK*ll*r cautioned th^ Planning CoaMiasion in accapting th«> r«»oval ot non-atructural hardcovar for structural hardcovsr. Mayor Callahan atatad that adviaa was for both tha Planning CoaMiasion and Council. Pataraon reported on Council action on xoning applications praaantad to thaa at thair last aaating. Saith aalced if it is their job to thoroughly review tha applications and do an in-dapth review prior to passing tha application on to Council. w-ro.- '“illahan stated that is correct. Councilaamber Ooettan fait the Planning Conaission could be stricter, and added soKetiaas new inforaation la presented to the Council that the Planning Coaeission did not have an opportunity to review. (•7) OTHIB ISSUES Peterson reported he has been asiced to serve on a County Road 15 laprovement Coaaittae to review the possible upgrade of the road. The next SMsting is scheduled for August 5th, 7:30. Saith reported the next Highway 12 Policy meeting is scheduled! for July 21st at 5:30 p.a. She asked when tha Conaission would begin reviewing other issues. She suggested they consider a survey of applicants to determine ii there are ways to improve service. Mabusth suggested staff develop a survey and present it to the Comeission for review. Schroeder nominated Smith to be the representative On Highway 12 issues and Peterson the representative on County Road 15 issues. (f8) APPROVAL OP MINUTES It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Peterson, to approve the minutes of the June 21. 1993 Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 6, nays 0. JIl 'I -1 HltfUTIS OF THi OFOKO PLAKHIITQ CONHISSION MBRTIflG HELD JULY 19, 1993 If9) iKPFitSElfTAiriVl fO TdH CQUBClL MlKTiaO P«t«rson and Snith volunt«#r#d to attand th« Mating August 9, 1*^93 Council aaeting. ADJOUKNMKRT Chair Schro«d«r adiournad tha ragular Planning Conaistion naating at 10:10 p.a. C^tLC^' ^iirlas Schroeder. Chair Person A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETLNG MONDAY. JVXV If. 1993. 7:00 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COL7SCIL CHAMBERS COCNCn. REPRESENTA-mT;. I. Diann Gocticn ATTENT3ANCE ACTION ITEMS • Review of itiesc items will commence prior w or between scheduled public hearings. L Apirikants presenting variance requests before the ConOnisston are asked to move to the podium ad the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. #1829 Diane Sictf. 1080 Wildhurst Trail - variai^cs • public hearing. 2. #1840 Jim Taylor. 1342 Rest Point Circle - variance - public hearing. 3. f 1841 William St Lori Cornelius. 960 Tonkawa Road - variances - public hearing. 4. #1842 Tom Browne. 760 Brown Road South ♦ variances • public hearing. Sketch Plan Revhw 5. #1843 Robert St Joan Suess, 2590 Watertown Road - sketch plan/subdiviston - no action required. ^l.liling C 11 't! 1I I111 It] I «f$ 6. Report by Planning Commission Representatives to C ouik U Meeting of July 12, 1993. 7. Other issues for discussion. Additional Items 8. Planning Commission approval of minutes of the June 21. 1993 meeting. 9. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the August 9, 1993 meeting of the Council. adjournment i-4'' 1? - 1-3 V r • 5nr? I*' p .• ,! k i>; .!• .!' .‘I » :i: *. |.l . . 0 1 I £> > O.9- o' I 5 Dg Ks til 5 ^■ h 5 b I 6 >c1 <0 <o<o««• a » s I ? o'a 3 a Is o ■» l-> t v»i a3 5•« i I o' •t CX §■5 a 70 •§a TJI M I i 5 O a R B«• •< Ul 3 K 5*«q Oo a r. c ^ I f'* r n a ^S- § S' § '/> {;; a 0 < a ?o1 '(rn Ka- •a u? 2?? oa S' 3s w 5* £ {j a DO 3 H ••* 5 DO 3 f.a poo R t/1 g 6 s3 ij f?2 ■gcr h itM 3aV3 3« ii ft* 5* 3 n0 S 1 H 0 1 >?u * 0 c. ii 3. t ??n *«c 2 rra 1vq a' .u* 5-p t J » 15 ? a nI 5 3 o rjc; 2 jT 3ava 00 i-> VO O CR C/JR' r5 o 5? cL Ha a. » < 82 • TJ C 2R I n O’ o > f* ^ ^ 9»?WI S: C S i-S tJ A le 2.1' a- n 91 § r-O' u 3? “ & 5 '* 2. n1 o u a“o a "S- C‘ 0 . 3. a o a c- |§o o 5 O P s *0 o*a s K S - si S’<f» I I cf* 0 c; 1 ■a 3. ? O o y ? a «:r P.ca cr R- 3> o g oR a m Ja o 5tHO ^-1A-:l?2S C - aPsSn fc’^o ams /. m fbaning Commisskw Meoibm Ron Mdone. City AJministrator FROM:Jeinae A. Mabasdi, QtnMitv & Zbmng Administratcr DATE;J«Iy 14, 1993 SVBJECT; #1829 Dime E. Sieff. 1080 Wifclhu«i Trail • VarUocei • Public additiofB to eatsting decks co mpleted by her former hushmd, Roy E. Benson. Excesses of hankos'er cxia within all setback areas of the property Additioml hardcover resulted with an S’x20* exttmion of northwest deck resulting In a 160 s.f. of additkmal hardcover Within the 7S- 250’ setback area. Major smicfurai repairs of the exiaing decks also wtxild lu\^ retired variance :^)proval because of the excesses of hardcover within 75*250' settnek area. In^irovefnent of the structures did not require setback variaoccs. The following otdtnancei are peninent for this review: Seetkm 10*22. Subd. 2 (A) • Hardcover review A. 0*75* setback area - 7,900 s.f. Allowed ■ 0' Existii^ * 183.2 s.f. or 2.3% Proposed " 0* S.75-250' setback area - 19.000 s.f. Allowed • 4,750 s.f. or 25% Existing * 7,500 s.f. or 39.5% Propped “ 7,592 s.f, or 39.9% (add 160 s.f. reffiove 68 s.f.) Additional hardcover « 92 s.f. or .4% Total hardcover variance * 2,842 s.f. or 14,9% 250-500’ setback area « 1,600 s,f. Allowed “ 480 s.f. or 30% Existing * 580 s.f. or 36.2% No change proposed of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C • put Map D - Benson Letter 12/26/91 E - Benson Letter 3/6/92 F - Neighbors Acknowledgment Form G - CcHincil Minutes 10/30/79 H - Building Permit Application 12/20/91 2«iii^ Fik IIS2^ July 14. 1993 2 I > Vjflg Letter J . Om Letter 2/2T92 K • Omaa Letter 4/^k/93 L • Survey Site Plan M - Ek%^ioii/Profiiet N * Floor Plan O • Site Ptoi • ProfMKd P • Letter frotn Nc^i^Hwf Pticfipttett ttf KerpiHt Existinf liecks at of liouse and! at souUiwert comer were ^tmcturalty retired. Deck at the mwrthweu comer was espmiSed from a6*c20' to a 14’&20'. Alt stnictures meet the required setbacks. Excesses of hardcover exist within the 7S-250* setback area. The new deck resulted in a IfiO s.f. new stnictural hardcover. Appticaitt proposes the rcimival of the shed within the 0-75 ’ setback area at 183.2 s.f. of hardcover. In addnioa. concrete slabs within the 75-250 ’ setback area shall aho be removed at 68 s.f. Total hardcover on the property is reduced by .3% and there is no longer any hardcover wjthlni the 0-7S ’ setback area In 1979 Grady Sieff now deceased, obtained the required street setback variance tor Uk construction of tie accessor) structure in the street yard, review Exhibit G. Mr. Benson cotnpleied the insprovesimts without realizing the need for building permits or variance approvals. Diane Sieff. the appikani, has filed an applkatioo after a year and a half of delays fesultiia from misundersanJings and other problems. Statemeot af Hardridp, Uttiqiie flodlop or Practical Oiflflciiitkst Please review Exhibits D and E, hardships noted b>" Mr. Benson in flic prcpartlion of the land use applkuuion &JT would »Jd the following: ! Total hardcover on the pre^rty has been reduced by .3^. 2. 3. 4. Af^licant has (nuposed total removal of hardcover within 0-75 ’ setback area AD structures cither remodeled or expanded meet required setbacks. The only variance sought with this application is for hardcover within fl» 75-250* setback area. Issues ftn* ConslderatkMi Are there other areas of hardcover in eifl«r 75-25CT or 250-500 ’ setback area that could be considered for removal? art OF oFC*o - wia»cs apflxcaticm % O (T^ ■• *i«?!:fMr'tL-rJnS:^rur.=<T X o .<•;.-;} d) ^ 3«r.«wal v*ri*cc« r#« Si.00.0C (r.o cn*c?« fro« original application! Aft«r-th«-r*ct raat (Coutla application fa#) r»€r]i Jl.^■rrr^r-mw ,*V» f.'l •»,* •• »r«i« A»i •4»- L i4^ \ < 4r i) rSOFlUTT LOCATIOa Sit. io to-U.'H ii.. f f'^ f Prop«rty Idantification Bual>#ff (P.I.D.) xa^al dascription to applicaticn if not Includad on raquirad turvay. Appticjun-^^ £ S/cFF 'T // ** •'> 4 '# **'_____ Phor.a (hcTtta! VS njljiaa '5T Phona (wcr)c) • ?3 * '* Addrati: /Jfo-t,. /_ Cityt --------- 2ip*_£5X i V (if diffarant than applicant)Phona (hoffia) m~ Phona {%fork )__^, Addrtaas City I :ipi Data Proparty Acquirad (•enth/yaar) I (do) (do not) also cwn the adjacart parcels of land. vtasswn osb of pkopbstt Present loning District L r<--19> Preient Use of Property (^^idential Other (specify) OSSCRIFTIOH or MaQOEST Estimated Construction Cost 9 Describe request in MBgOZUD Lot Area Lot Width y'Hardcover Setback Variances (Front Side Rear)'- Other 3AXDSBIP D«»crifc« un4u« hardship or prscticsl difficulty rsiultir.g frcr strict f •nforc«r.t cf ror.icg rsculsticftsi ^g€ Ltrrufc_______________ 5*smiP?xcai of chosom . wopsrrr cokjiti ^ D«»crib« uRusaal prcparty conditions rrsvsnting cosiplisnca with Zoning Cctie r^aoftti: . . ..............— .. ... XUD SOBniTTALS Ccnplstsd Applicsticr. Fcrc Csrtifisd Proporty Cwnsr* List o£ ownsrs within 150' (you aust obtain this list froa Hsnr.spia Ccsunty Osfsrtasnt of rinaaes A-603 Covt Center 34i-3271). ^ Plat Pap (obtained with property cvners list). « ) Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to inclodei Zy hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) ccpy 8»i-xll* for , reproduction)* Topographic survey (esisting and proposed elevaticns) if any changes existing grsde are proposed (provide one copy 8*!**il*)« i. etches or plans of floor t elevation views (provide 1 copy ah*xll*). 7. As an addendua to tnis application# please attach a separate list of any other persons ycu wish notified of this application. I. Additional items as cay be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please rwnber that vour variance applicatioa is not complete_if—the—above i«VQr»iStijBn has not been included* APPL1CA»T*S 8IGHATOU . ^ « The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator# agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application# and certifies that the Information supplied is true and corre^^txa^the bes^of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature ^ -----Date *■/ ------ OMMEKS SIGMATOU ^ The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorises reasonable entry onto the property by City staff# consultants, agents. Commission members# and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of^ia req^^Q^^^5J^^^ Owner’s Signature ^ _________ Date /V — Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before ^e Planning Commission Meeti.ng. Planning Commission Meetings are held on tne third Monday of each month. Applicants must, be present at all acbedoien review meetingn of the Planning Coswlsaion and Council. If *n unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make *"*"9««ents to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buildin, Office of this change prior to the meeting. # mm Mit ttm/n1m w-iif-n tsITttMiyarr i(T iI*» M tT'llT'ft » ffn ttM* HKUPMISV Tl •UM • •UM • *• - I - ;• ♦« wm M n MM •MM NrUMUM? n TMMVn fOOUti V 1C RCMV MM MtaMUn? TMtk •OM m USM r ^ r«Mmvrau M tT-iiT-n t% tmi MMtr l«f UMPC c • WMwnm ■ MMU e • fMMPni • MMSr UM UMlNi • » V ••f mix « • ^ • , * ^ . *1 ' f * '. t • < • * k ?; 4 a -j/ - bM • * •. f ' T m i r '.■> ’>1 • . . .. f*« » •«. k*. * » “ -:l O /.i ,* ' ^ . i; /'5Vv; •' TIM tnitaillTM •r>ii?>t« MMunasT Mtr i wMi Msr M •tl MSM M •r-iir>ti M trif •MM rOMSr iMt IM»0 • • ■ 9MM0I •U • MUH MtMOi M«l«f IMtt UMWra SUM) M •7-UX-fl H* tm% •MM MRIST UPJ UMINB ■ « NII.Tf* J« • J H MU.TI« ■TOMM H Mint M MM rOMST UU iiMlNB m »»SM M •7-UT-tl It Ittt •UU niMtasT Tl 4 • C CUiilTMjom n • ctMv i cautnH UU Mi^MUMT Tt ifStt . t 4 HMif m>miMIM •7-ur-n n tut•iiU ittiitMKIT i MMt •OMIT i MMI(T n ii-^ • T‘‘i 'i » • M •7 ’ItT.il it i4H) •!«•• MiBIMIST 11 • ii WULTX ITii MtMT i •CHUiTX HM Ml niMuer tiin m liitt M •?-ll?.tf It t«tl •MM rOHfT i«U UMMHil J M MtM • K i MM MM MMST i«n UNWM •OM It* tSStt r. M •T-m-tl H SMt • IIM miMMttT Tl Mvn H •tm MVI» M itlM mt MlitIUBT Tl MQUW m tcut i I » • . . ! r /.Nf--.;:-- - ■4-.* I »«' ■' , a4 ? ir%.• -k--'* r i ‘ j ■■ i \ • • t • * < w • •;f ' i i ^s’f* /% ■!* v ji’j-,.. - •*•< V ■ r . ^ ■n tiTf tt/mim* ♦v'V*-I*..• • *0 •1; •.' •» I* • *..< ■ • -! *• -r . • • J ' ^ •1 f. • * ^ ♦ -5^''L' ; ^ . ; , « • ^ i v^ > r , • ^ ^ ' ,‘. * • . , * ■ / •►• * M -■ • t i -X '' * % ■■’.;•■' rV' ';.T rM ' * " “ . I ^ ’ .» - ' •w .V''-ii ■ ;\.sV:&.:..-.r . • • ns trtTIHm iitf ■»?». PHiM» -s%’fr../.rr»i .j-'V .'• 1 * ’% • * /• 4 ^ > 4 10i/if. <r »1>-- * • * * $ • f A r ' %% * % • • »s<^ • • • a * •%Vv § 4 • ; vH.'i S.' “'’4' ' U -* •%i^ * I •%■ ■ :■ V-- H;;r ?Sir •'. - ' •. ,. i/h *5 j>* '*’ ’ **1^ I Oirtty TMT TNI ftcn mmtumn »m m iccuMTi nwMnntMrmai v mnmmim »» tr tfHum Twt mtv •• tw or TM MiiocriN catwTv MPtmmm or roartorr rimm.*!* it na iMi otiiir •5^ W!*'yi •;•'S'1, •o ♦ t. ‘ - • . • UTI 'JL^i w ‘y^>kuM- > ; .'4 H. t i ► • :V: •:'Sj:v''-'" •--•-4i.\ ' f • ✓ r % • ij r ‘‘ mC, r • ^ ’ A ■ ‘n4 I, . o INcMiMr lf91 City of Ororw' Crystal Bay, i 55323-«$#4 To vhoa It Kay Concarn: I startad out replacing '^'^arped and dasagad dacking and tha aora I raaovad tna vorsa it got. X continuadi recovlng idasagad dackirg and dacidad to anlarga tha ona dack off of our badrooB. I was than inforaad by tha building Inspactor in a lattar from hia datad Oacaabar 9, iv^l that I should hava gottan a building perait and varianca. In sy discussion with Bruca Vang and Michaal Gaffron it -as suggastad that I of far to rasova som hard surfaca to off sat try dack. I *1 purposing to alisinata tha shad down by tha laka and 3 cenent slabs on tha south sida of black top drivaway* Roy^Stson 1080 - wildhurst Trail Mound, MN 55364 D #1 .Q Harch 06♦ 1992 CITY or OROIfO HARDSHIP LETTER TO «H0K IT KAY COSCERM: I had a bad tractor accident a fev yoara back causing a badi Injury to ay back leaving no with a groat deal of back pain, bocauso of this it is getting acre and aoro difficult to go up and down steps. We have a saall deck off our house facing lake side. There is a full flight of stairs from the deck dovn to a large deck where we spend the evenings and the weekends enjoying the wildlife and the lake itself. We would like to enlarge the deck on the north east face of the house to 14' X 20' It is now only 6'x 20' making it useless for relaxing and entertaining without moving to lower deck by the long stairway. We can not build over lower d^k with out ruiior reconstruction of lower deck and liciiting lower deck s usage area with posts to support upper deck. The ground elevation under proposed deck is a 3' drop away from house Is over a 14' span. The land is not useful for any purpose because of the slope. ,9^E. Benson Adjacar.t Prepare*/ Owners* A%cknowl*dgesenr Fora I <ve) Ao '^re ,^/ of [print nanaCs)![rrtnt addrass] >,»<.•• -.••‘«wec the tiar.i Jor the prcjcsed ipprcvetsent or ptoFceeo uie of the property* located at //fo WnoHufST:.._______ •!•<» referred to e. t-er.d C.e Application No. I (ve) understend that ih eaecttih, thi. (ere) not e»)ced to declare epp-o I (we) ea (are) aware of buC o^r^ly to con^aira for th© vw * • r%^n ^ met: or usothe inproveaent plans and that the proposed neiphfor a project j^®^uir»§ Council approval. D^ta 3-J^-9s>. I ♦'Property Cwnar Cate :ce« 1 (we) PvriW tfV ^ (print nane(s)J of Lv>l4V\c«rdT (print address I have reviewed the plans ' property located at /e->>o c , l wVU sw-Y rv^.. Application No I ,we) understand that in (are) not as)ced I O'** *■» (are) aware of but merely to proooeed neighbor’s project or usethe improvement plans and tha- w..e pwopo»« ^ requires Council acproval.#lor, O ^ pfoperty Owner Date Property owner DAte If you have any **ut*co^iSilnts'’to'’the’’*Building 6 lonrng'offi ” rriea?t l^da^ prior to the acheduled meeting date. • I * Ik . • - ^at, lift vT ,—m. * •»^Mm «!«•• Mtf rtMMT* MmM UM tUt pmm« / fMtMi -rVfw a VMiMM at arMr •Uii$ im |/f MM MIAaiti ftM mu, «mi ftWMif II, MYf, h MM ^ ••!•• > • .If >S-"^ '«* mM.'tMff'*H*^V*T ^ ^ . —,— ^ ♦ r, 1 -f «■' i ^ • - »* *T**“'-^' -. •f a Mna vaM aaHbiaaa - * ' « af If* far tka aaaatcaaUaa a< a U* B ••• ‘y , yT <*^^1 /(^.v »*»y»» tu >» inwiy »» r JiS —5uiT - v^-*, fsaia. m liaa ttaa la taUtlaa ta iHMkam Vtail vUl b M aiaata aiaiaa aa Mfatf ataklaM* aill W raaawai, aai ttmwm ia aa ' ,^a Is •-T*, » pavaa 4ci aiaaaa M, lf79 far r« aiaa. at la tka ralatiaa ta •aiaa tka arlfiaal aatvay, tka aai aita iaapaatlaaa, it ia aatamiaai tkat tka pfafoaai tirafa will ka at laaat 10* fraa tka atcaat rifkt af war at tka aloaaat i«iat« m4 tka Oaaca will opaa away fraa tka atraat. CMacil Waatinf - Oei r JO, 1979 •atlar navai, naaaaapala aaaaaiaO, to apprava tka variaaaa ra qaaat of OraBy Oiaff, 1090 «il4kiirat Trail, par tka laaiaf kdataiatrator * a omo af Oatakar 3J, 1979, Hariakipi laaatiaa of koarr aa4 pa voi Orivoway ia rolatioaakip to WilOkarat Trail, notloa, Ayaa CS) - kayo (0). Alaa Olaaa, City Plaanar, tka variaaaa raqaaat of 99 Otuaba lay koad fiartk, which atataai iato tka record latarpriaaa, Ina., Oatokar 3J, 1979, VAftUkCB if itakba Bay fill Waatwood Batarpriaa Plaaaiaf Oaaaiaaion wo wad to raoowwaad approval of tka Maa twood Bntarpriaaa* appliaatiaa for a fraat yard aatkaak variaaoo of 90* for a dataakad farapa, 33* X 30*. Plaaao rowiow tka Plaaaiaf Caakiaaiak OLiaataa of Oatakar 19, 1979 for tko rooaoBoadatiaa aad kaekfioaod diaooaaioa* Tka appliaatiaa iavolvai a 3,9 aata lot aak)oot to tka fivo aBoata, Tko I propoooi looatioa aa it ihtarfara witk fotoro ooptio oopaaaioa. fka Plaaaiaf OfloUaaioa 4i4 oot appr owa of tka airoflar drive aa praaaa tad oa aito plaa hot of aaiatiaf cork out akarod ky kana to tka . ^ : ♦ iW • ok' * I-... . r - » • .>•t'r idL *U ^ e’. 9 TctAl r*«£ $ ciff OP oioso - icnjono p®mit awtioiTioii * Dat« P€C«lredj 7I ' Date Approved:■» Entered Bys Permit I j ALL XlfFOKJIATI MUST BE SUBMimD IM FUlX BSPOME FLAM REVX£H WILL I* STABTID (See Check-off List Enclosed) TfflB APPLICANT ISs (circle one) CWNER or COMTBACTOR JOB SITB APORBSSa / i j\ \ 1 / /IIP: (work) 7a/ I// ■ANB or OHmi 4?^ « t /5 r V * ^ ^____________________ PHOBBifhoae) y 7 a. "VI 3 c MAILING AOORBSS: /<j-‘ S' O'L'J. / V 4 u w > 7 a » I CITY i Oft <?*■«? XlPa 5 1 ^ C V* COimiACTOF:a PHONEI NAILING ADDRESS:W ▲ .A (I •SIP: TTPH OF ffOAKs New Addition__ Accessory Stmetare _ *^ve_ Dead_ _ Remodel/Alteration Rencvete_ _ _ Lend Alteration^ PBOFOSBD HOBX (describe la oetelDs i STORIBSs SO. FEET OF BACH FLOORS ■O. OF BEDROOMS:GARAGE STALLS: ATT.OET. KTIMATED COMSTROCTIOM VALUATION (excluding land): % I hereby apply for a building permit and I ac)cnowledge that the iniormatlon above is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City and with the State Building Code; that I understand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a permit; and that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE I ^DATE 9 %o #■ "> »•,S CITYof OROXO D*c*»b«r 5« 1991 .V Mr. Roy Benson 1090 Wildhurst Mound* Klnn«ftota 55364 D«ar Mr. Benson: As we discussed in our telephone conversation on December 2» 1991, you have replaced an existin'^ '•eck without first gettinq a building pernit. The 1919 survey of our property shows the deck tow«rd the lake to be siuch ssialler than the new replaceeont. That survey also shows you have 399 hardcover in the 75**250* lake setback zone. To got a building persit for these decks or any nev' constrmtion, you will need to reduce hardcover in this *on« to ibt or obtain a varianco for excess hardcover. This is the same problem encountered when you applied for a garage addition in 1989. 1 am enclosing a building persiit application and alao a zoning variance application. Please have tne variance application completed by noon on Decesiber 27th for consideration nt the January meeting of the Planning Cosssission. If you have questions, contact me for help with the building permit or Michael Gaffron for help with the zoning variance. Sincerely, UCE VANG Field Inspector BY/ch Enc. THJ >NE - 47>7357 • FAX • 4^-0510 J K ■ o o . > % «• A. CITYof OROXO wr IL -" >/ • * 4 •'~'l ' V • .' ( i .• „v Fvbiuary 21 t 1992 Hr. mnd Mrt. Roy Bcntcni lOtO Vildhurst Trail Hound* Hinnesota $53i4 Ret Deck Construction Dear Mr. and Mrs. Densoni On Hoveaber 27, 1991 a stop Work order was posted on your property regarding decks that were rebuilt and enlarged without a building pernit. As of this date, a perait application has not been subniitted. Therefore the City aust now require you to reaove the decks and provide guard rails over the patio doors or provide s perait application with the required subaittals for City review before March f, 1992. If this deadline is not not, the City will issue citations and refer the aatter to the City Attorney for further legal action. If you have any questions of if you have a problea aeeting this deadline, please feel free to contact me at ay office. Sincerely Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch Enc. - Eerrait Application cc; Jeanne A. Kabusth, Building ( Zoning Adm. Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning i Zoning Adm. Bruce Vang, Field Inspector tjli-fhonx --f?3-73S? • Fax • rrMSio V CITY of ORONO April 26. 1993 .-^;-1 QO-C. jj ' : j \J -.i. Ms. Dm E. Bcmoo 1090 WildtMni Trail Moutxl. Minncsoci 55361 Re Deck CoBitnKtioa Dear Ms. Benson: On November 27. 1991 this ofncc notified you of the rcquircnKnl for a buildinf permit andl zoning variances required for ihr decks constructed on your property. Your options arc to ei±cf remove tlic decLt or apply for a variance. Be advised that there U no guarantee that variances will be granted. The City must require you to remove the decks cr submit a complete vanance application beforei lav 12 199^3 If this deadline is not met. the City may initiate legal action. If you have any qu^tiom about the variance application, feel free to CQ«aci .^eanne A. Mabusth or myself at the City offices. Sincerely, p 'll r .Lyfe Oman Building Official LO/ch £nc. Variance Application cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang. Field Inspector telephone - 473*7357 • *47^510 ■■ fi V- . - o o to Qt O rf Oi n> — ^ “I I s 0 U1 3 I II C3 □ iO 01 O “I 3Tn> T •••r ■=.■•• ... :■■ m;vm (■■• •'/a ' r- m 2 o a oi 3 IQ -j ►- r- 3 o< ro (/» 7r fB Q ‘1 • »o cr. • n n: o — I- 3 3 Ci o 3 lUa -n c:(* • « a t/> o ri»*<y r a o »< o “1 r.- lo O* II* 3 — a r\) Vj *3 ir* ^ u u* 3 3 n> n I/I \ ^ V §I = c“ K m ;a o *3H) m XIcr> r.r.2o \ ! H *.VQ rJ ^ li ! r r I * <. ! V a S4 »- v> > r4 M. (9 #1 Q, OO ' :) /^. i 0,./ •« K t. • ■ • *.:**<*i;^ M® 8 ?:•' Wm r^± f» hi.Ui 2 •••' ** ‘ •*••».* r* ■' -..7 -> ?•. I? -a Ji ............ •y •, #^;ilS • ••# • ♦ % - -*^ • . m X . . ''jWTfj ■•?*-■■» •* • ■" •-» <►* ' '-••'“ * • . ♦ . *-• •--• * ^'- ** \ • • ^ • V i_V ^ ^ • -> ' ’T» «, S^ -^4 « •*.« ^ . ^ . *r ^ 44 ^ • .*♦«••• 4 ' •• ^ • • • • 4 _ -fc_ V* 4#-* * ♦ • -..-r ..*-,* r,< - ->55^F b<M •>-■ \ '%' • ■ ' ’^ • ' " 't rs-5.A- > V ^ "^. ^ • • •■ • '• - ^ • f * • «j iv • MagjuC 1 S' issrScr»»iminj 4<l^SSS^ (j.i-y cPOruno rl?:: ?K \ ^(xj^ P \a»^»’i r«iGc^ r^rv'tis/un ^ iUc are.^iok^e nert C^L'cr nticjh hers ,CCL*^ (jre odjOze,n^. ^ (X;c. oi^y ^ ■ w^ d^'^ 64'.?^ a lakeside^ h^y^e.IP u.... r<L • ^/'r?(tc£/N?y</VC Alhn A Knfim«w -------- LNto MN 9&M4 I ,/*-• «»..• • ^ y - i .^V.J — 4.-r>»..ii.^.--^v---- : T* V *1•fc-— *^'**’** v*, • *- * ■ ♦• - TV •■•*' ,- 4 ...,* • . ' , .- • • . . ^ y• . • .• • ^ 4* •*• 4 •• • ^ -:* V.J- •fV.'’.'**-■' - •» '•Jv ,\ '\'V ■ ■'*■• :. ,f*.w.- • '*'. ‘-‘' * - •"■* •'... • ■ • 'v*‘--»v-'-'''i-' ■ •’' •*-'"'1':•'•* -•■'■•■-• '•■• TO:CommiMton Mdsben Rob Nlome. C«f AdnuBeram’ TRD5I3 kanop A, MdiBsih« Btnyjflg & Zsm§ AkBSBmnmr D^Tf m July II. 1993 St'EIECT: 11840 Jim Tavtor. 1342 Rest Poua Circle • Vamnces • Public Hcariiif The applkam proposei the cnorcructiQa of a 22 ’7 ’»3’4" dKlt/t* ilkway cocmccfir^ upper IcTcl p^uag area to tsk «kck stniciure The stniclufe vbill be located approximitely 7' from dw fade lol line and 35 ^* from the street lot Itne As walku»ay/4ecK stnicture will be attached fo the pnncipal stmeturc. it OMtst assume pnncfpal stnicturc setback. A side sett^k variance of 3' Will be rctpiired. Stnicture will be located ov^ a ntm hardcover surface and will require tsardcover variance as excesses exist within the 75*250’ setback area. The following crdinanceii are pertmeitt for this review; 1.Section 10 03. .Subd. 14 (O - coverage T<^ lot area is 15.140 s.f. Allow«l ■ 2.271 s.f. or 15% Existing • 2.539 s f. or 16.7% Proposed • 2.616 * f. or *17.2% *^Note that decks with railings that extend more than 6' above grade are included *n lot coverage inventory. B Sectum 10.22. Sufad. 2 - Hardcover within 75-250’ setback areai Total area • 9,590 s.f. Existing • 4.976 s.f. or *51.8% Proposed ■ 5.053 s.f. or 52.6% •Review Exhibit H, staff has added »idUional driveway area adjacent :o garage, sidewalk along south side of garage and area of circle stone walkway. Also note concrete slab at 10’xl5’ is located within the 0-75’ setback. Hardcover has been recredited totally within the 0-75’. C.Action 10.24, Subd. 5 (B) - Side yard setback variance Required ■ 10’ Proposed ■ 7 ’ Variance » 3’ or 30% Zooiof Fik # 1S40 Juty 13. 1993 Page 2 llili A • ApplicatsHii B • Proiperty Ornm List C • Pin Map D - I. R. PeicncB. M D., MoiiihS Medical CIuuc E • Floor Plan F • Ekvatioci G • Hardcover Fact Sheets (F-75* H - Hardcover Fact Sheets 75-250* I - Hardcover Site Plan J - Survey of Shimline StRxained for Appltcation #14H3 K ■ Sunty 9/25/75 L - Resotutk»i #2806 DcscriptMHi dT Re<|tte^ Please review Exhibits A and I. applicant wishes to insull a competing tfcck from uppeir level parking area at street side to second level sale deck with ktcss stairs to grade level at west side. Review Exhibits E and F, ipplicant claims current access to rcskfcncc from higher elcvatioiis along north side arc difficult because of a medical problem noted in Dr. Petersen's letter. In fact, applicant had advised that he had hoped to insull the connecting deck prior to his moving into the residence on the 21st of this month. Current access stairs with no railings present hazards for the current owner with his disability. In 1990 the fornKT owners applied for after-the-fact variance apf^val for <ructural repairs and sKWiiions to the existing boathouse struemre in the lakeshore yard, fhe City approved structural imn''ovemcnts involving a 5*xl6’ deck loca:ed 4’ Irom the 929.4 clcvyion. Staff inspecte ^ ite and viewing the improvement plan submined with the application, it wmild appear that the proposed linking walkway will be ins aded ovci natural ground cover resulting in additional hardcover. As shown, the structure wdl be approximately 7 ’ from the side lot line. The deck would appear to have minimal visual impact upon the adjacent property because of the sloping topographies, location of mature vegcution and view windows of adjacent residence. The deck will encroach no closer to side lot lire than the existing deck. The addition of the connection walkway will result In additional structuml coverage where excesses already exist resulting in an increase of .5%. ‘■.'S 1 1 Zooix^ FHe f 1840 July 13. 1993 Pifc3 A|i>ptkaflt should he advhcd that curreni survey infomutioo tnd harlccver facts art for the curreni review buf if any other unproveroeoxs are proposed for this property that an survey and hardcover uiveniofy vill ret^iral. This notice should be included in your final recomusendatioiL Statcmnit of Hardship, t'niqoe Fimimss or Pradkali Dtrficulties Pk^e refer to Exhibits A and D Isnica for Coasklrratioii 1.Will tr be txcessary for applicant to remove exisiirg hardcover improveiwnts to offset the addition of 77 s.f. of new structural hardcover? If so. what improvemerns may be considered for removal. Refer to Exhibits O. H and I. 2 If an iflaproveJi access to the property has been defined, c.in additional slaif structures leading Iroin parking area be removed? Options of Actkm Approval as proposed: (7 Approval subject m coiaiitions. If hardcover removals are required, the hardcover must be removed prior to footing iiepcction for the new construction. Any condition of approval must include notice to both curreni and fumre owners of a toed to provide an updated survey and hardcover inventory if additional improvements arc proposeil for property; or Denial. UL A r’ 4 CITY OF C9CHO - VAJIIASICF AFPLICATIOH Initial Application r«9 1175.0' ($50.00 per each additional variance) Reneval Variance Fee $100.00 (no change free original applicaticn) Variance for ncn ccnforiaing nae $200.00 Rfter-the-Fact Fees CDcuble applicaticn fee) cm [f r.%3sc Fima iiF?7;'£ ijciicvcocc Ai a *1 Lficx ‘ r.’ 1:5. &i YCUa. icc: sc'i T:s.\ 4 a* FR0FZR7Y IKPORMATIOli j . ^ A' , !• / ^ a ^ __ _ _- - ■■Site Address Property identif. Nuiaber (P.I.D.)^/ • #a .e • r ' ‘ £/ ♦ _ _ _^_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ * '■— ■’..• V«* ■•• V/ '« /Jl. (■* Attach legal description to application if not , A included cn required survey. ^ ' ' Date Freperty Aeouired • ^dsonth/year> I (do) (do not) also cwn the adjacent parcel a of land Present use of property: Zonino District I_ _ _ _ _ residential other(specify) APPLICANT Name ^ Phone (hoaie)_£./ » . f Phone (work) *' Address: • -■ Citysj^Zip:err ' se«a»e» QNNER (if different than applicant) Nane _ _ _ _ - - Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $__/ Describe request in detail: ^' • - - V ( , t e .• « •*, / / r. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width >• Hardcover _Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side_ _Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONTRITIONS Describe unflue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Dcning Code reguirepents/ L.I ^ '/ i tt •i «mm MTi 9f/9T/n ^ • -/>.ft » •MTca m ; sft t7«iif^t SI Ml*•u*r mMT pomr cis -I 9mw mm . M t mctM • a a #ii««mi »#* TWAur » f wuian • acMcca ftocssa ^ ' IM7 Ksr aoiNf cxa SSIM T * ► r? ,4 \ »AV1« f- M tf-iir-n SI mf MMs mmi won m t Mtwmtmt tTi4 i «r A* mtm m sum* » »ih ' »» T«w*na IMf«/i > M tr-ti7*n 11 ttn •iiM auT pantr cx« ^ a I j t rmoa j a TAVioa • j a TAvioa iMt acir aoTMT cia . HOUND tM s»t«% % r>'^.* V 4 ID t7-llf>n St MSI t auM aiDT MINT cia ‘ oaca mm wD • j doiu ja TAMDAvia ^ tant a • jtiaarta aoits ja MHI/mA ism aiST MINT CiaCLI NN SUM iS \ * • ' • *•: *' # • ft • ' *• .1.1 ■ ■* ►* - ‘C, si • •;< jv. • . ^ VI*' ficM wnnnm iisf 1 «BttfOiT ai,» tr-iir-ts 11 MIT ••1SS7 aisr PUMP ci*• iSTtviN N Mcaarr 4irmN N Mca*fT 5tssp Msr fONT cn NOIM *« SUM 4 JM Si ir-iiT'Ci ii wco 1 •1SS« MCST POINT cn JiHict a M mnioi 4 jaMICC ■ M «*TTf*' i. lisa «sr foiMT ctacLf NOUHi m SUM ^ 1 i n 4 ■1* #T-11P*II It ftts wr' V•ISM aCST POlMf Cl*• ir • a a a m***ixms9« RttTN e a aama n MaMUNsoM ISM WST POINT Cl*« ts»« l« SSSM Jt ar-iir-ti u awt r f aiSM UST point Cl*4J * a a N HITT f •iCNaaa a Maajo*ic a nctt - "‘p.‘ISM Msr poiMr cii -Ji* ftmjm m ssim jg. ' M tT<itr-n n ftia •isi* attr auMf cia a«t*Ka MT Aacna Mma AjKtMa ISM aasT apiwr cn H3U» m SSSM *■• m M tr-itr-ti SI uti aiSM Mtr aotMT us MOL ipmai curt jaca tMaaas surt •*M tiST POWT cn HUNa m sssM PXUMI * . *# f -Ah ^ • i W«_ •. • , s,, a :, ^ t. ^ ’ ,1^ '' * U •7<ll7>tl 11 UM fissa mr aomr cia aiCMMD i mmimm •1CMM9 I iMttaeM lua M17 aoiNT Cl* hbumd m SUM % ’ti'E' - r- s si-’ ,,£ • $• ’f,****/ ‘ • / I , I M* ** L -/ 4^ •. ‘ • _ . i >'-0i » >S ♦'.» ■. i. I ciamt Ts*T m rim atracKNTti sai m accuaari i *c*acscNtATi*N or iNroamrioN u ir amaas ran urt or fw MCWCPtM COUNTY KMaitCN^ Of faQfCVV JaXATION, TO or NT RNOMIIMC AND UUCP. M--. s.;'# 4^^DY . A*< , • •'i i % « \ • . . i a " V ' ' * • s' • * • ^ ^«• ^ V p • • % • 0 ♦>>. !. V.®, r ;:.‘K i/i-'bj:# ^ •••^ »■* - • ift -■ ■«« MOUND MEDICAL CLINIC #1840 June 10, 1f9) t«: Jaitcs Taylor To iHtoai It Hay Concarn; «r. JAi5«a Taylor waa seen by the undersigned on May 14, 1^93 for coaiplaints regarding knee pain* He had had knee Injuries in the past as a college athlete and has had soew probleas since that time, all culminating in soaie osteoarthritis development in his knees. kt this point he is not a surgical candidate ho%rever needs to be treated medically. One of the important considerations in patients like Mr. Taylor is avoidance of climbing stairs, particularly going (k>vn stairs is nechanically difficult for patients with knee probleas of his type. He's told me that he is planning an addition onto his home that may involve stairs, although with a variance he may be able to avoid this. I feel that it would be in this patients best medical interest to avoid stairs if at all possible. Sincerely yours, Jerry R. Petersen, M.D. JRP/ck ^ .i: I 00 o JLb. t / t) < •% f. j: •• *••• • mm . m * > . « i-XKX(rm aicjwTics KRJSJrii? iSTiAcx zznt: Cctac;.! c«) Cp^T^ 73-25Q ExistittG Kax^csve ^ in Z:»£ /3Vi Cfticfc 250-500' 5CC-i'3.3' r ■* A. foUSi ____* * M -•K.P. P»rci% LttGTH JCL_ X 1U)2 *^-JS-S’ ^aAT" f.r. • • S.P.• • • •• _____ - - - X e • j.P. • •• X • • 19 t.P. 1. Saraoc _X m i.P. • * c. D riyg ^ay • --- X t.P. •• » ------- -- *-P. • • B. Slcr^'ALS _ X m S.p. SythltAd CriHa^IS X l.p. d) * X / •I.p. f *____ s.p. f^.LANBSCAAS • • X • Ml S.P. AAEAS UNOeRLAlN lY 1 X _m s.r. PLASTIC SHEETING X • m • - s.P. •• • ......- X ..._ .. • • • • i.p. • • 6. Otheh . • w . • -V X • • • .«—• m _ S.P. • • ^ Total HASDcavEH im Zcns Total Prcpesty Area in Zone s .,. a s ( . •\ <d m r—r > ■;. !j_ m ^AS -UJ Sd^S X 100 • _!T33_-/o I l»^ O-Ti* ieVt»e^r*-- m ¥MOC(raK CALCifUTiaS KCrtXi^ UTiAcs ir.HC: (cr«:»£ c?«f) C-75*^/5-25C^ >250-500* 5CC-IOCO' CiiicU " 1 a ■ Existing Kaao " A. ' 0CUS1 • CQvu in ZONi * .- 7</0<5 / t.».4 1 *. %. •' -i ' 1 Ik O LlX3Ti! • ... X . Yn27n • • • l.F. X •• i.fV• • ••...... X •^ ............ . ^ il*F» «•m • . > X ^ m • - l.F. 1. Ear AGE X J?</• . (a^Hy i.p. c. D uiv Fhay ( r|• X . to 3S ^ • f AGO ^ l.F. ■ (J/X —,/S • - M65 • • s. Sitr^iix 7^( 50 1 ir-'' m 3 (-7 ^ 90 • . w • 90 » - *1^2. . .li^ .... *_ ItO / l.F.• 6. Eatio /b*c* X ,• . 6i y i.^. f.UNBSCAFfi • • .gft -.., X ._ ./k • MEAS UNDCJILAm lY • - ELASTIC sheeting s.r. S.F, S.F. /JeUi hftl^ s. Othe.1 __S-3S 21 S.F. _ • • Total KAfiocDVES in Zone Total Prcpesty Area in Zone . rrna.f, Is I i-'. f- fa : t*v ^ <5 53 <r^$7 /o Sketch for Harold G. Vogt In Lot 10. Rest Point Park va 1 hereby certify that this sketch was prei red by me or under my direct supervision, and that I ctm a dulyregistered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of the State or Minnesota. COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Hark S. Gronberg HN. Lie. Mo, 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota • ^ A■r /' ■ ScaleDate 0 1 Inch = 20 feet April 20, 1990 Iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. A rf f -4 • j“*** 1?.t w^. .;^,, . . • • • * •# •m • « • - *2 ^«7Hta« MiiuMBUi PLAT OP fUBYIT PITT fW R-fcVm.rA W*Ww ^.i%X r <&J»> ji Pil^iL M§m.f>A £S^A4 M ftHtn Lf^ >»K*f 9Ajk_lfee^Liiy»^*^f I *i.i/ •*vov^ - •j^ « ■ II < r«£4» '*V * •i i*#^r M/AfMr To<y KH 1 >Mrib| c«tify tbAt aii. . lfjLir”l tbAt tto «• plat w a CM fact rapMHMMiw^ CXfiw£/ c?jdC;;3?:;-\ • • Cl TV ORONO 5693337 City of OFtONO RCSOiUTtON OF THE CITY COUNCIL MO. 3106 _________ % l»0umcni GJIAMTIBO aftsh -tie-fact VARIJUICBS TO HtmiciPAL loaniG code SBCTlQtti 10.22* SOBOnnSlOMS 16 2 PIUE •1413 WBBKBAS. Harold and Merle Vogt (herainafter "the applicant*-) are the owner* of the property located 1342 Rea- pSint Circle within the City of Orono <^ legally de»cribed as Lot 10, »e*t Point Park Southwesterly half of public right-of-way ILot 10, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the proper-y )? and WBBBBASf the applicant* have applied to the City for after-the-fact variance* to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10. luWivilion. 1 and 2 to allow .tructural structure consisting of a deck addition to the ^ ■ t-ucture located 4* feet froa the shoreline, and • from the .«>t «id. lot line, and oth.r structural repairs to the accessory structure located within the 0 75 lakeshore protecte area where no structures are allowed. MOW, TBBRBPORE, BE If RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; FINDINCS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile §1483. 2 T'he propertv ie located in the LR-lB Sirgie Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, as such the is subject to all pertinent lakeshore regulations that (govern development within the zoning <3*.strict. 3. The structure was constructed some time in the early 1950s serving a* a boathouse and storage area. . pattern of use of the structure is for storage in the lower area and as a three season porch in the upper level. 4. The structure serves as an accessory us# principal residence as structure contains no plumbing o heating. Page 1 of S L “.vA City of OROrXO C I T V Rf SOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ORONO 5. In 1975, a lot area ea.ianca was orocertv to constiuct a raaidanc®. A condition of tha. ".“o-?s2'r.Vu".’nc*.«.r Certificate of Occupancy. Occupancy for the new residence. 7. The structure received ninl^l repair and use fro« 1975 to the present. [i,. uniqSfhins” lif f J;:*:tru«u?r5sr?f elevation). 9. The applicants performed ma^or -j including the construction of a lakeside decs, hard b siding to the upper level and the installation of windows. 10. The Otono Planning Cocaissicn reviewed this applicatio on January 1«, 1950 and recomaended approval of the a^ter- the-fact variances baned upon following findings: A) The building has existed on the property for over 40 years. B) The structure appears to be in good condition and is used as a supportive/accessory use and not as a second residential unit. 11. on H.rch 12, 1990 the Orono Counci' f approved the after-the-fact variances based or. the following findings: A) The foundation of the structure provides stability and support of the lakeshore bank. B) The structure has existed undetected for o”er 15 years. on the property C) ' e applicants had no knowledge of the original requirement that the structure was to be remov^ed nor ‘.VhotV p*rS?:=«V ‘are! Ian receive major or minor structural repair. Page 2 of 5 1 Cit V of OROINO Cr^>aUOkUTIOI^ Of TMICITYCOUSiCIL fiO. — 2»0*________ ORONO 01 T«rrr *• Dufty. •raperted datad April li. 1»»0, found lha •Iruetoro to L<{ In Bcuntl struc^u^^il condition* 13 Thm City couftcll bmw con*id*r*4! thl* •pplication l~arL'S%.s^ health. •*f*ty and %i*lfar* of th* co«»unltf. 13 Th* City Councli find* that th* condltiona •aiatino oR ‘StKrpdn; rr?p\‘.“ro-r ‘,‘ Vr.r:3 M-s-t-irsi? "pVaa-^r/rri^rrUV neighboring property: would not a*r*ly a«rv* a conv*nienc# to th* *PPjV f*ji JJff H alleviate a d*«onatrabl* hardahip or n*c*aaary to prea.rv* a substantia 1 \^a applicants: and would be in k**ping th« intsnt of the Zoning Coda and Co»pr*h*naiv* Plan of th© City. OOHCUJSIOHSp OSSER Al® COHDITIOMS accessory structure used as a three season porch and I-o- and approves th* installation of a lakeshore d*ck ‘ the west Sid* lot lin* and 4' froa tha lakeshor* whara no structures are allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1 Aoolicants shall obtain a building permit for the remodef/structura 1 work done to the detached accessory structure. 2. No structural repairs shall be approved for this structur-. This shall include remedial or total the Buisonry wall foundation, repair of rafters, posts e or joists. Page 3 of 5 r city City of OROINO ntSOtUTION OF tHECirr COUMCIL NO OMONO 3. The Amzaehmd l«k#*hor* 4icc«*»ory f provided with h«itia9 of pluabin^ nor n^nll the Structur* b« allownd th® u»® of m ^5 #«^ur« r®£rlf®r«tor it approved for us® of applicant* and futur® 4. 4uthorltl«» 9r«!it«a by thit yi*** *J2proparbv not atth tho applicant*, bat «r* porniaalv# only and autt bo oaareiiad by application for a • ithlr ton day* of th* dot* of Couneil approoal, or thl* virianc® will aapira on that dat® («una •* 19901. 5 Violation of or non-co»piianc* with any of th® t®r»a end titlo of th® property. Adopted by th® City Council of th* of Minnesota^'t a ragalar aaating hold on th® 29th .ay of May, 19 • ailin, Clty ”ci®rk Jaais R. Crabel^T-Maj^2JE Q;opyrty Ownerv*J * ' Pag® 4 of 5 Citv of OROiSO Cir Y Of ORONO RlSOtUTiQII Of thf CITY COUf^L STATE Of MINNESOtA ) ) S«. COOliTT OF EENHEPryi ) Th« tof^oin^ in*tra»#ftt vmm «cknowl#<l9«^ b«for« m on euniclpai corporation and anid inatrusent vaa aaocutad on botuiif of th« City. STATE Of MIKHESOTA ) ) ••. COUKTY Of RETJNEPIS ) Cn this day of Xii Iff ^foro 're a Notary Public within and for Taid c-unty, parionallH^ appaared Ua > ~ Urc r-id the same aa hla (their) free act and deed. STATE OF HIKNESOTA )sa. COUNTY OF HENNEPJH ) On this day of /'f^JLrl-^ Urp ^ 11" >J 7o d..crib.j in .na .ho eJTSrut.d th» foregoing instrument, and acJcnowledged that he (they) executed the sane as his (their) free act and deed. C.U. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 1 City of ORONO o» OPONO I M RfSOiUTIOM Of TNI CITY COtl^XIL liO _______ mrm or wimraoT^ > I ft. COUNTY or BEKNEflHI I Th« for««oln<i ln*tfu*«nt vmm acknowledged b«for« »* oothl. J»w d«y ot __________ ■; •nn.f®®*!*. Crabek 4 Dorothy M. tiell&n. «eyor i City Clerk of the City of Orono, • Hinneeote Bunicipel corpwratlcw end aeid inetrusent we* executed on bohelf of the City* MA Pago 6 tiiM m iCUOL^IOSt 12t0« 5TATC or HIIiCSOTi* l' ) ■ COOilT Of ilSiCPI* ) CITI cr OlOKO ) m da h«r«&9* ctrtlfy tn«t X h«<f# «oapart4 tlit forcco*ni ««Py • raiolta'-isa «f tM* City Csuacil of t.-.o City of forofo^nt « P7 Mf auen r*»olatloft la tao Hlawtoo o. tho -dlaJi o*f C‘ty Cauaell it • aootlat of soil City Counoll hol4proooodlata of a«.o w.ty ^ lid oorrocf/copy of .oio roiVlatioo -*a 4uly .4cpto4 Py .oi4 CquocII ot aaltS aootlni. la Kltn.n WTtr.of. I B»*. Btr.uata MB ay B»ad ISth . cay ef ____________• ‘’-ii------------------• ' •. c-*-*: •i-.i . >'^j ‘ "*:**■' - V orotay M. lallin,City Clira o o* raANSffiR £NTlfig» RR.lfmrittr ?Ai A 00^^ TO: FROM DATE: PlMnan Connittioii Members Raa Maofie. Cu> AJaurntmor Jeaaor A. Mabitstiiu Dtuldim & Z »tf n I My 14. 1993 SUBJECT: flS4I Winiim & Lon Conieliiss, 960 Tooiuvba Ro«l • Ythance PiMk Heaftel PrrtiiKat Or ♦ 111 r 11 res> (Sectiofi 10 22. Sulid 1 (B> • l^alirshoft sctbick Requifed • 75’ Fxistic^ “ 50* ProfK»el - SO’ Vvunce • 25* or 33T iS«T«>«Tn 10 22, Subd. 2 Hankov<f wUhin 0-75’ Allowed » 0 Existing • 1.200 ’ Proposed » 1.200 ’ V'arunce ■ 1,200* or 2.6% List of Exhibits A - Application D > Addemhun to \pplicauon C - Propcfty Owners List D - Plat Map E • Minutes of 9 W92 Council Meeting F - Survey of Average Lakeshorc Setback Line fer 1992 Land Use Application G - 0-75’ Hardcover Facts H - 75-250’ Hardcover Facts I - Current Survey Revkw Exhibits E and F. in November of 1992 the applicants applied for a variance to the average hkeshore setback to allow construction of new residence and pool that would be placed completely in front of the average lakeshorc setback line. The application was approved and applicants proceeded with construction. The new residence is now occupied by the applicants. Problems commenced when it was realized that the survey submitted with the previous variance application. Exhibit E show«l a loop driveway completely located out of the 0-75’ setback area. Neither the owners nor the contractor had realized that t^ surveyor had relocated this specific section of loop driveway (review Exhibit I) out of the 75 setback area on the survey, if the driveway loop is to be iasialled as shown on Exhibit E. the improvement would result in the loss of several mature trees. My 14. mi Page 2 The ipptKaaa' coainctL'f oom m ftb k> applicatioo, Fahibit B. itie roadbed vcnld fee dctifBcd tp as to dirret ranofT to the totoh aaS «esi to as eitsttog colimkw pool for the load watershed Dram^ would th» travel ov^ the grassed area eventually toMatweO Bav 1.200 s f of aossinitsifal hardcover wouM remain wiihiBthe0-73 ’ Ktfesck Meat The rood is iccaied 50* from the 929.4 ekvatniL The road will letnain ai a nasimum 12 ’ widdl. Descriptioa df Harddilps. t’nufoal nndtnss or reorlirai IhfTkiiltia Pkas revtow EUiibib A aad B Appl>cana luie the fcQowtng : I o> • 3. 4 5 7. Surveyed’ had proceeded to change tocMKn of loop drive as ii fetaies to the 75* setback line rci^irq; to the City’s ordinance standards hut faded to advisf feoth owners and owners’ contractor During the winter months the contractor proceeded wkh develofxnent of the sue not realizing that the driveway was located 50 ’ from the lakeshtm It was never the nHcittkjo of owners to expand on existing driv’et bed at 12 of the tocMion of the mature trees within the area. If the facts were km^wn. loch a miuest wtmW have been incitftkd withi the variance applkaiion reviewed in S’' ember of 1992. Dnveway has exismd in its preseo cation for over 70 yean. The retocation of the drive would result in tte destruction of six to eighl mafufe oak and maple tree*. There will be no «kliiiona) encrotchmenl nor hiraer disnirbancc of tte 50 ’ setback area few installation of the road. Driveway will be constructed so that drainage would drain away from the lake towards a grassy ’ area to the west providing treatment before it enters the lake. 8. The driveway configuration faciliulcs safe ingress and egress for the site, Issires for Consideration I.Would the fact tb.it the driveway exists within the 0-75 ’ setback zone have any impcct on your decision-making? ZoMf Far ilS41 My 14. im fife 3 Caa isg^ef form of fticamoiw d be prmiacd for Cm propen>? . . . iod muKata dicilriiS BabiaasM boise ol this urc o« 1 3 Kre nie . . itnd ibe masin * 4^ I» '* y^lTtOF u - VJUI1A»3 AFFIilCATlCBI 4« 1! A 1'»•*•;;: -i.' ^ Initial Appllcutloft Tmm S17S.OO (ISO.00 par aach addltlonai varianca) Hancwal Varianca fe*i $100.00 <nc changa fro* original applicatioa) Varianca for non cmformlng ota $300.00 Aftar-tha-ract raea (DouJbla application faa) an if cioie :z^^>occ Cl ££» 175.A .€ia a 1.5.AP PPOPEBTT UirOaMATlO*..£.i.vr-r^'..' r; Property Identif. Bvaibar (P. 1 .0.) jT* /< 7 * ^"1 ' ‘ Attach lagal daacrlpticw* to application if not Inclodad on raquirad aurvay. Data Proparty Acquired -yj. (nonth/yaar) Z (4»3 (go notji al*o can tha adjacent parcel a of land. Praaant uaa of propartyt ^_^««^^raaidantial other (apeciify) Zoning Dlatricti U i (L Phone (hcBie)APPLicAirr Base Phona Cwork I Addraan 0*«.W. c( Cityi '^Vt<w ^Zipt omEll (if different than applicant) tt->AVtn.ti^ 4 \.tir >__V^nt^fc^a Phona (hoaa) 9 io - _ _ Phona (work) <f*>J-/«3V4 Addreaai Cityt _ _ _ _ _$ip*_S£V^ Eatimatad Construction Cost IicnBCPiPTioH or request Dascriba request in details V^uvcV Cov<tv> \iCwv^a\^«a *7a- *~|TVV>%^ • ^ ^VThjur^tuX - ou* ri, c\ t > u c ^ VARIAECBS required Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore _Other (specify) BARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTIOII OP UNUSUAL PROPERTT COHOITIWS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements; /__ivy.v^ C\ ^ V C'v^ A t:: V ? \? vl 2a V . ^ ^V<•-.Au c- u lli Cl r* \ ■ (attach additloiMl ah«#ts if n«c«siary) rXUD SOBNITTALS All of the fol loirtnqt information oost b* »qi«lttod by tho applicotlooi deodllao dato In ordr for To<Mr applicatioa to bo eonaidTod coaolotot 1. 2. i. Co0pl«t«d Application Fora _ _Ccrtifiad Froporty 0«#n«ra List of o%m«ra within ISO* (you auat ^tain this list froa Ronnspin County Dapartnant of Plnanco A-603 Govt Csntsr 34S-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with proparty ownars list). 4. Cart if i cats of survay (ai^gnad by a licansad survayor) to includa hardcovar calculations as raquirad (provida ona (1) copy 8%*xll* for rsproduction). 8. Topographic survay (axisting and proposad alavations) if any changas in axisting grade ara proposad (provide cna copy SH"*!!"). i. Sketches or plans of floor ft aJavatlon views (provida 1 copy •H'*xll"). 7._ _As an addend 's to this application* please attach a •<*parate list of any other persons you wish notified it this application. Additional itasis as suiy ba requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property 0%mar oust sign this raaaBbar that your variance applicatl<» is nob information has not been inclodad. application. Please if the APPLlCART'S SlGHATimS The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tiae net covered by originsl fee payment) and/or consultant expenses Incurred in review of this epplicetion. end certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the beat of his/her knowledge. Applicant*s Signature oats OMRERS 8IGXATDRB The owner hereby ackowledgea and agrees *o this application and further authorirea reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Cominisaion members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all aubraittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Connnission Meeting. Planning Coenissio.i Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present et ell scheduled rmvlew meetings of the Planning Caemisslon and Council. If an applirart is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend In your place and to edvise the Building ft Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. h Stephen LO x N gman builders I N C Jmiw 13. 1f»M IW fto Jbnkmm Rd . • a tsrtl rvcQwntmg at whf «• tudilattljr find *jfs«fv*s apptyviQ lof a vananca As fou facal I si^ucted !fvs fieuJ craw fiocn Ron Kruo^sf aruJ Ataocsalaa lo iBcaia ifie <’.iOing drf^aw>ay and thtm < on out aiavay latvon *a cans taSora fou tor our ongnst vananco roquaat ro^dng avwa^ la»<e*nora MttMCh Wtwi tha taclwseiRi in Ravay oftca *a» prapanng tna linal driving h# noticed that 1200 VI H o* tha an»*t*»g dnvaway «»aa sw*da the 75 ’ kikeshora sett>act< Ma looti a uBon hanaaff to change tha dnveway cn tha Mtvaaf'aaa plan to ffwi • conlormad lo the coda <5d not tai ina that ha (id fNa. nor ad he reabze tw was iwpaij out had a groea ol maiura hardwood trees w®i the jmjea ot an araaura. Wa prooaadad wd d® proiect urxief the assumption that tha dnvaway on tha siavcy was the dnveway aa a. m »aa austad aawa 1921 Had *a fenown othtrmsn wa would hava s«ealy daa> w«h a at our fm vartanca haarstg our h»\'ihi0 that tha <»?\eway ^^s a«'5tad m tTs curram tocaiion tor ovar tauanty years that tha dnvawrry, by your standards, has always teen hard covar. »« tfo! 10 maua • outoda tha 75 takeshora sett3«li would dajtroy 5-8 nalura oaks and mepiaa Ptease note that wa would nor ba ^sturbmg any of the 50 feet of existing marsn vegetation on tha Mashora which provides run off fittration or any othar itxistmg traaa or vwgeiation Wa would shapa tha anstmg drivaway to tha the drainage t)e away from tha laha and towards tha grassy araa to the west which ia afraady a colartor from dta adjofrung lots and provides first stags aaralion before tha run off aniers tha lake. Furthermora this drivaway configuration facilitates sate mgress and leyess for the sia. Jeanrw. ftease do not haaiaia to cafl me if you .‘wive any questions or halpful .jmmants Thank you tor your patience and professionafiSm during our past meetings. Sinceraly/“ SiweTShgman Prasiuenl lENLCSTEPHEN LONGMAN BUILDERS. INC "Custom Built Homes ’ 13539 Oak Hill Ct., Eden Pramc, Minnesota 55346, (612) 937-2987 ad ; MTt v) 1 f MTCU MS . *(* GH€i N4Hf TAWSYm NAMi/IMt M«iir-n If M01 TQTilAM I P DOM/H A DOM TAl&Tm liMRINCt a nAffUm DOM 4SSI MOMitlCM» riXMTAlMI UCANAOA CA ^IDU I p 4 ^<4IN DMP AMS cMca Nam TA>^AYfA HAHI/AOM SS M-U7*fS U OMSA AMMSS UMSSXGNCt M 0 a t J COMUilS MUaAH 0 COMLIUS , UMl J CtMNiaUS PM TONUHA n OtQNII HN SSXS4 -' MOD MMt OKNill Kim TA^AYti NAm/AMD ID M-llT-fl a MIS OOP7S TCMCANA M A J rARAS a H R TAVCQ61R AKtNOKY J f ADAS P7S rOlilAKA HD LQNQ LAAi ft! « SSSS4 ( >C - ^ f ' .‘-S * .5 * m • •ijl ’ t t ■ -i-V; • f - , t •r <- '•> o ‘ii&i' * • # « > A* : • • f r» T \V >.* *• f i* .V- ■ -i’-' ■' •■ ■• ;* • ;}'t h H»\' •■ CUUNTY MODtiTY fNTOMATlON SVSTIK MOPfDTY (MCIIS UST la It Mof MP7P TOHiAKA tO a A lAuta art lauca aicKAiro A a miGA a lauci TONKAMi to 10N5 lAAc m S53$a ID DD-ll7-ei If DDM DDMa aAarcNHMD at DDUCI a HADY trCttSHA micf A fUaY IKCiLSHA MO aAauNNooo aa LOtM; LAAI rti ssisa IS M-117*2I fl DOU ODPDS TONKAKA DO GAMIU I ^AMOUa DADaui i jm&am a UNlVfMITY AVI N t HPLS HN ISA II ataoDT ND. aiAiDMi Dim If I ^ Id •D*ll7*fl If 0001 , OOfM TOmAKA M M e a I J comiiics MUUAK G coamiius loai J coamiius DM rco«ANA ao oaoNr; HN saisa ID 0D*ll7-f| a MIA MASS TCMAHA M J a K DiiDcar jams a a hary n GiiDtaT ois rcmMA ae LONG lAU HN SSISD TOTAL OATCH OtfS ,*> ‘D •■5’ , Ts I- * \ I CCiTirY THAT THf I ACTS aCPAtSCNTtO ARC AN ACORIATE AND tRUf atPatStNTATION 07 XHroaHATION AS IT AODCAaS THIS DATE ON TM7 RECOaDS 07 tH€ MtraiEPlH COUrafY DEPAaTMtNr 07 PaOPtRTY TAXATION, TO TUl; DtST or HY RNOHtEDGC ANO 611X17. . 4 1 ■ 'f' % ■ .•; •>*' -1 V.' * <A . A . -V DAT •*vV'' •^ • ' / Tl . '-VvT/ V* .X*" • ^ »^ % ■ .“1 ‘ •»4;- ■iM:v# I t ‘ *> . A ’ ' ; ' A V.* 'I • ' ’t’"?!vf, ;• tj. . ' HINUTiS OF THE REGULAR CR0«0 COWCIL MEETING HELD NOVEnaER 9. 1992 (#7) ilTia OR. WILLIA.M R. 9 RHONDA T. OHUIE, ISiO SMAOYWOOO ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION faieS Or. Oflill# was pr#»#nt. Haouath •*elaln§d tn« Planning Co<«»» as ion tAbtad I!!* aopl.cat.on daal.ng «ith a raau.at for "* Vll portion of tha apoNcatlon dtais w.th th. rj; raccimandad to ba approvad by tha Planning J , applicants to coraplata final roof dasigna for tha ‘ J!: sne notad approval of this portion of tba projact hardcovar to ramatn tna tarn# on tna propa^'ty. It was ntovad by Coattin, sacondad by Butlar, to • 3193 for Application SI 769 Or. William and ® tnS Shadv«ood Road, for a »ida satback varianca for tha addition tna axis'ting rasidanca. subject to tha condition that hardcovar ramain at 23.1*. Ayaa 3, nays 0. (id) ilTTO^WILLlAM A LAUflIE CORNELIUS, 960 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION *3138 Lauria Co''nallui was prasant Mabuith axplainad tha aoollcants raquast an avaraga ‘•*'**^°^* for . nl« rosid.nc. and a grad.-l.v.l pool. To "...t tn. Ivlraaa lakaahora satback, tha rasidanca would hava to ba 'o^atad I^JrJJimitalv 20r from the shoralina. Sha statad tha naw rasidanca lould hava miniiral Impact to surrounding rasidancat axisting rasidanca is tocatad in front of tha proposad location. Butlar askad that Finding A specifically define lineal shoralina of tha property. I, W„ moved by Jabbour, j.con'I.d by Goat'jn. to adopt Raaolutlon a3i96 tor Application ii770 for William and Lauria Coma ius, 9 po^d for an average lakashora satback varianca to «n$?r!ct ^nes resid.nca and srade l.v.l pool. a. amended, ayes 5, nays 0. (•9) #1771 JAMES A SARAH JANG MARKOc, 3A0/350 NORTH ARM LANE - w^iOTPRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION *3197 Mr. Steadman and Mr. Paterson were present aopiicants. to represent the k: i II p i i !i ill i iiiI I'l’l 1 ’ n ! J 1iiill ill 1 jlif ‘I! Ji m ;i! I •m m 43 m M =Q i I •1 > ib. H I: m sinAc* zcOT: (emeu r:-25a' :?C-5C0^ 5:<MCC0' ExiSTirts Ha ^cc 3v « 1.1 Zeis to A. Hcu S£ • .. ... * ...• % l,P. LE.KTM NI5TM X iHt m S.p. *m t.p. • • at ___m•*m s.p. 1. Haraoe X -s.p. C* CsiIVtWAY /o ^X _______ •/jQvJ,s.p. ..-.. X m • . s.p. • D. Sior<«ALX »m s.p. K m s.p. * .m s.p. E. Patio / Deck X «._ • MB, p. Landscape . - ..... X m •s.p. AREAS UNDERLAIN lY * _______m s.p. PLASTIC SHEET1NO X ,m . i.p. -X m • • s.p. s. Other X ...... - • s.p.• Total Hahdcovej? in Zcns Total Property Area in Zone /Joo s S.F. ... 0 i /j>OC»X ICO • c3»^6 % JUi H^ROOT/E^ CALCUIATIQH UTBACK 20SE: (CIICI.1 CSf) 0-7 Ejnsiins Habxsvu i:) loici *. HCWS£ ijG I.F. L£?t6TM ... ... M . . . . _i.p.• • . *s.r. X .. ___m S.P. 1.Garage ............X S.P. c •D rivt ^ay . . ___ -.... X - - .m O . f.p. ......... -... * - -..-m IxP* 0.?IDE«AL2 .. . X ^m S.P. 1^0 A 1 7- X ..... „.''f .. ./#f u , S.P. y o o X / jL./ o S.P. E.>ATIO/ been.\ c x m .. s.r. f.Lanoscaps X .. . ./cc o s.r. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY ..... X . -------- --------S.P. PLASTIC SH^BTINS . X ...............S.F. X .._ ._ _m S.P. e. Other X S.F. K • Total Hardcover in Zone -r(-..?9C S.F. ^ s.p. ETotal Property Area in Zone 7^. j y [T) i[T] -7^.IS'/ X lOO - -j?‘sr % % I f H L **4, TO:PtJini^ CoBomMOQ Mcabm Roa Moom. Coy AtfmrturMw FROM Jeanne A. Mabmih. IfenUtof & Zotung Admimsln im DATE:Jttfy 14. 1993 SLUICT: 41S4: To« and Sheila Itewne. T<sO South Brtr*ti Road • ViriaiKcs Public Hearing The appHcaiioii involves murtipte vartinm foe additions to the existing principal structure and the insuDatioi* of an acoesaory stfucture on the rtcenUy classified Ukeshore property . Fof v»rs the applicants had proposed improvements maintaminf a 26 ’ netback from the Zetland Incased siithin the east portion of ha pro perty. Review Exhibit F. ^jiplKants' hardcover facts have been prepared basol on the setback from the Long Lake protected tnbuury ai the east boiBadary of loi. Unfomtnaicly. per the shorcland ordinance. Tanagcr Lake at the 929.4 elevation is now located at what was orifinally determined to be the edge of the wetiaiid. Staff has to rcadjtat the hardcover facts based on the 75* s^bKk line described in Exhibit O, Two-thirds of the dry boiklable envelope arc ih3w kxitcd within the 0-75* setback area where no tmprovemems are allowed Smicturcs that normally met the 26 ’ setback are now nonconforming located within the IQO’ setback required for stniemres from shoreline of Recreatioial DcvelopiKm lake. The foUowing ordinances are peninem for this review; Section 10 Subd. 16 (C-1) - Setbacks tor Recreational Devdopment lakes The following ifnpfovcmcms require setback variances: A.UpfKT level deck to be enclosed at pifi of principal structure. Allowed • 100' Existing - 56* Proposed • 56 ’ Vanance * 44’ or 44% Screen porch addition located over on existing deck (review Exhibits O and I). Allowed - 100’ Existing “ 48’ Propos^ ■ 43’ Variance * 57 ’ or 57% C.New deck structure. Allowed - 100’ Existing » 55* Propiiscd • 55 ’ Variance » 45’ or 45% ZomM^ Fik f lttl> 14. 1993 2 D Pooi/decl: sracczrr Alkml - too* Proposed • 59’ Vanaiice « 41* or 41 S SeciMO 10 56. Sebd 16 (L I) • A. Hi cr__n) developaieflt ULe. 0-75* setback am - 23,375 ».f. Alto«^ • 0* Eatst'fif “ 4.540.4 s.f. v>r 17.5% Proposed “ 5,239.9 s.f. or 20.2% Additiotul liafiJcovcr - 699.5 s.f. or 2.7% R Review of hanlcom «rithm 75-250* setback arei - 15.440 s.f. Allowed - 3.860 s.f. or 25% Existinf * 1,216.4 s.f. or 7.8% Proposed • 1,580 4 s.f. or 10.2% AdditHMui lardcovcr • 364 s.f. or 2.3% C.Review of tt«al hardcover (iMoed on dry buildahte area only) Existing " 5.756 8 s.f. or 13.9% Proposed *■ 6.820.3 s.f. or 16 5% Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Review of stnictural coverage. Total area » 41.315 s.f. (total dry b-iildablc area) Allowed • 6,197.25 s.f. or 15% Existing ■ 2,320 6 s.f. or 5.6% Proposed “ 2,951.6 s.f. or 7.14% List of Exhibits A - Applicationi B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Neighbors Acknowledgment Forms E - Survey - Existing F - Hardcover Fact Sheets G - Site Plan - Improvements m kfc 1-. Zomag Fife #184 2 July 14. 1993 Page y If • Efevatiom East/South 1 - Grade Le^-el Fkx^ Plan J • Existing Deck Plan K • Second Floor Plan Descriptkm Rrqy^ The proposed in^nvefnenn on the propernr consist of an 8V6*x7 ’ enclosure of the upper level deck ai the stHiihaut corner of the residence. A 19^x16’ screen porch is to be iitstalled over an existing deck wme 31.5 $.f. or additional hardcover extends closer to shoreline elevation at northeast comer of screen porch Review Exhibits G and 1. an L*shape ifeck %idiiion is prq^oad akn^ the sooth skte of the renuining deck and new screen porch mucture with an attached 20’x26* pool and deck smitture to the south to \x placed adjacent to the cement patio area (slab of former garaee). Revieu Exhibit C. the new hardcover improvements within the 0-75 ’ setback arc 31.3 s.f. of screen porch adJitioii, 320 s.f. of pool/dcck addinoo and 162 s.f. of new deck. Staff has also designated the 50 ’ street setback and 100 ’ structural sctb;Kk defining the limited building envelope of the property iDeicripefea of HardshJ|B« Unique Findings and Practical Difficulties Review Exhibit A. applicants note the following: 1. 4.9 acre parcel has been reduced to less than a I-ekic dry buildablc envelope. 2. The new 100 ’ setback for recreational dcvcli>pmcm lakes plice severe restrictions o»* the building envelope making existing structures nonconforming. 3. Current septic system has been found to meet the 3’ separation required by new Shoreland Regulations and Septic Code. 4. Placement on the marsh area requires some form of protection for outdoor living thus the need for a screen porch. 5. The majority of the dry buildablc area at least two-thirds is located within the 0- 75 ’ setback area. Staff would add the following after completing the review; 6. Stitictural setbacks defined on Exhibit G would classify the property as unbuildablc if open for new development. flu m CITY OF ©FOKO - VARIAHCE AFFLICATIOM #1Initial application F*« $17>.00 ($5Ca00 p^t mtLch additional irariano Renewal Varianca r«« $100.00 (no change fro« original Varianca for non confonain^ usa ^ ^ i After-the-fact feea (Double application feel PROPIOtTT INFORIIATIOM “2^0 fS^nLL//%J I^L/L o €5 A Site Address Proo«rtY Identif. Nu»b«r {?.! .D.)£Ju~ (t 7' i)-3~ llTcl LlVl d..cripticr to .ppUcti-o if not CITY Cf O^C.iO i vrr.T i ^ ■ A ^ * a w 4kZ * Vi. ** v»a w V w'wv on required Acquired____7 a (fflonth/year)included Present use of property: X residential loning District:_ _ _ __ W/. APPLICAliT tiame Phone (hone) V7?* 92X2. iv|.^ Af^dresst ------I.f^ (if different than ar/plicant) Phone (hone) Phone (vor)c) Sl^'~ — 3ip,jvi££ Name Phone (work) Address City:Zip: Estimated Construction Cost $, I^QQBQS- DBSCRIPYIO* of RByUBST Describe request in detsll : 7-/rft-r /ew»iefoi*gyC ffl/Kfc CVf/----fiV F ^ •/ytU> -GitffXKih VARIAJiCSS RJSQOIRED _ _ Lot Area •y Setback: Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear _ Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) ^^iisBIP/DESailPTIOM or OiroSDAI. PROPEBW COHDIWOHS Describe undue hardship or practical conditions preventing compliance wit ^ ^ P-- f- r^rnirti^ ■'■'V fitrin, A.7 Vu »V/teici kit -------- SSAi/t ifTh*c.k^.—if/ ^7?nff (attach additional sh««ts if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS the fol loving infonsatioo »ust be sulmittedi by* the npplir»Mi%n| deadline date in order for your epplication to be considered ccapleteT--------- l«_X^Conpleted Application Forsi Property Owners list of o«mers within 150* (you nust obtain Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Ccvt Center Map iobtained with property ovnexa ^ist). -®te of survey (si'jned by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8»i"xll" for reproduction). S.^Topoqraphic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8>i"xll"). f*—plans of floor a elevation views (provide 1 copy 8H"xll*) nddendua to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ®»- -Addit..onal items as eay be requested by City staff. • The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please r^en^er that —^riance application is not carolete if the above ■IMprsiation has not been included. ------------------------------ APRLICAIIT'S OIGMATURB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees tc p«y additional fees (staff supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledge. Applicant's Signature^^jns..^/I Dato C> > f2 OmiBRS SIGMATORB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and iurther authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Cononission members, and Council members for purposes of Investiga- tion and verification of this request* Owner-s Signature /■— Date h ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planr'ing Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants aost be present at all scheduled reviw Meetings of th« Planning Cassaission and Council. If an applicant is * scheduled meeting, pl«ase make arrangements to have an attend in your place and to advise the Building « Zoning Office of this change prior to the mcotii,c. ifttt mnt/n^ '%(unm m n tl-tl7^ M Mtl —rn mam m %H ■ tOPMM • t M StWaCMM t tt*Pm a m »MMa» a Himra m nsn *• fs*iif*n as wn nasa aaaana um ^xi mm a asMti «aa a aiaMt »»a» faa «T niTzaTa m aam ^ raMPavia Mai-iif-ti ai aaat . ••••t mam m t ■ * VXCKIiMM tr at. tST aura tmm vxauwaM aoa taoai aa a Mavzara m sn«i »ana ^ i Mi ttttf t * • ifV « Vj** ' fT . .r .‘■i jift • V * ^ * ______MT pawutiflhi mnnMOPitu oicas ti$T Pt«lM1la as«iix*;s » fair ataaa watca hius aa » j taaaia. tan i&ubl Taans j laaam. mm matt ants aa lamTa m aasat »a ai-iir-xs m a«aa^it tnaaaa ntus at aiOMaa m Mjta ttat. aiCMMa « auta tats (data amt Mizata m lasat M as-imti *1 « aaaaa aacm aa t t i iMaua irai i MtTzara m issn n al-iir-ts as aata aataa taoM m t t a mom • s a aagid fnona a aaaw f aa aa aaaai aoaa Mirttta IH suft j-, a% # * 1 •V . •' '-V.*>• i'' H a f *■ • j>’t i » ♦ • ^. •• S Uf ♦ . la ia*u7*ts It aaai aaaaa mam aa t Mwa n sKfii t wrt ■mt a Shift •m mam aota stwre namra fai aassi Jt ta-tir-ts fi m*i •aafa aaaatat UNasstann I t aomw a J t coanm Aatua HtMMt c/a atar a coaMiH aaa far avi n npu m ssaai ■ n' i t • « ’f’ • !-• i!.: i-I « « t ^ f » V 1 a t f/t ,v»' a* J « s 4. I • ‘ ^ • '.•‘*** J h.f*?,: r ^ *^Mrrs ffCMtacNna aat an accutart inb tu S iSTtSinoS ^MWiTY TaxanoM. to tw atsr Bare • . i, fv;»i • 'T m»t W± *: *rA ♦ • •: -^5’ V: • • a f ' ■fpi ‘vjf'f;v??;Vj - s ., .•«', 'M, a £ . *1 ft ;/ TV ^ ^ ^ L'iy a "* i . >9 * h - ... a. •11 iJt 5. St •m ^!\ 10' in- a3 V-' r1 :)••1^30"- • • • • , _ .. __________________________________ 1 ri_gj^.gCCO»^ — [prin- «d<lr«tsl u J f ---------- # frH property locat:«d • jkppiicmticci No. «» . ^ , -*«cu*ino thl» ic)tnovl«dq«3«*t. I ('••) I (W«) u.-.d«r*tand t.^«. ;fl 1 or diMppro^al of tho prcporty or «»•• taro) not **)t«d to Council tnat I (wo) •■ <•*••> «woro of roqui^o* Ccuncirl oppJfa»»** Ooto Prop^* CwRor Doto Prcporty Cwnor . . ... . . . . . . .* I (wa) C tprint r.aro(i)l of ^ (print addrosil 1 for tho orocctod laprovoaent or ptopoied ^ Application No. 1 (w.) und.rst.nd that in ‘pp*ot^^”tf*’th^*pr^^^^^ ®' "*J (ar.t not a.k«S to d.cl.t.-approval « ^“l%hat I (w.) a- (ar.) avat. of but B.r.ly to confira *®' propoa.d n.lghbor'a proj.ct or ui*th. laprov.a.nt plana and that th. ptopo ^ ^ roquiroi Council appro^val. ^ yf J .43^ OiiT '^ca*'w JO 4yfy ^rTK,#1 Property owner Date Property Cwner Date I- you hav. any f “^t'coamln^" to "th\'*8u”rirn,i j“‘nro«i=‘: .ch.dui.d o..ting dat.. i property earners • »c«ne-led^n6 Pot» — -^rrp.^ •>; >-/'*•/IrUf P »* J ■lp'rinrpi«(iTr .ddr.s.lI (W«) have th« pUR» for th« propc»«<i mr Land 0s« proporty locatail at ,— —— ~ Application POo ------ , ^. . .«*cu*itO this «cytr.owlad9aa«nt, X (w®) I <va} undaratand that in ‘ disapproval of tha proparty cr uaa Caxa) not aaked to daclara council that I ('va> a» Cara) a'vara of but Barely to confiro ^ proposed n«ighb«^*a projact or use tha imprevaaant plans and that taa P p ]l^fK}uir#s Council Approval. iryU ------Data ^-<33-73 Froparty C^^nar Data I (we) S~. — [print naffla(s)] of [print addrass] y'toc.rtd 'T«"”rr«fLr./ to .. Lani os. Application No. _____.• 1 (w«) *'*’“^ p^”'Vr^dlslppretal'’tf^tha property or uso Cara) not askad to daclara pp council that I Cwe) an Cara) aware of but naraly to confirm ^ ^ oroposad neighbor's projact or use the improvement plans and that the p^osea v requires Council approval, g ^ ^ /I ^ property Owner #t Y. Date % 7ii /fi fa 1^3 y?3 Date.... '" - Property Owner I£ you have any sub^ t “ur*Lmmenrt ‘'^o " hi’*Bu7i'd!ng°l ^Sn\^ro£fi« at^VasVirdays prior to the scheduled greeting date. i Ctrti^icit* of Stfnrty forlhoMS R. iro»«ot to St’i of Soclioo 3-117-23 Hfftoopio Co<#tty, *ino€ioti I O T >JS c O ■«r H.•L f 1 t Jr c Vs 'l* T W «» % • • • s* v» K 0mmH9 o 1 . '* J£ «<i - -7 • Stftis . ,t .-4 A A jt i 4* t f>5 <? S-uT-Z^ I fcO SJ *1 UT^ O ri» • • . • f * ••V T • r* M i . i S.X.1W.\mfi •€*S E '/4 I.c:asr!.'!s sn«]s ?n* sth Pr.ncipM Her.dlan, EXCEPT the South 93 feet of <11 existing buildings thereon. It does not purport to show any o proveijents or encroacfments. COFFIN A G.R0N8ERG. INC. Date : 7-7-06 Scale: I" • 100'0 : Iron marker icTnioT?TZ75Flarn 5. uronDerg Engineers 4 Land Surveyors Long Lake. Minnesota c H O m o t m * ^ m HR U3 C • H^ROCOVE^ OICWJRTIO?I xoKft (ctic.1 oNf) 0-75' £yIlTl»« HaHOCOVM A. ' HousS niaT>< B. Oi^cz C. Da I VCAY X X mm D. SlCeWALK I. Patig /cec< % F,Landscape area: UNOcauUH BY . . PLASTIC sheeting X X Q. Other • Total H a ?.:Cov £R in ZcnE Total PsoPEsrr i» Zcne '0-500* 500-ICOO’ • o_i.p. • • • #1.1. S.f • i.F* ♦S.p. t.p. i.r» • I.B. •S.P. • S.F* •S.F. • •S.p. S.P. • • • s.p. •• • ••S.P> m s.p.• ZJX—s.p. C3025T s.p. A B 4 B X ioo — ;P/^/o iftiWfclta Ri?.2ar/'? oia'uiios wjw;.“RT . ,jnic* ict: <e..c.s C^t) 0-7S' 7S-2S0>OK-50C j) SOO-ICOO' CxitriMS K aakqvi ^ A. tiQUIl___Ml tnsTH N!2T« I. Ga ^ass c. r«ivwY 3. SiCr^ALK i.Patic / U€CK AflCAS IJNOCXLAlN it . .puisne SHEETINGS 8 • * X IP a ^ • • - ^ •a m • . M * % m 0 • X X • ------------------L X • —- flW X • • 6 . * - • • t.f. • .P. _ 1.^. I.P. t.P. s.r. I.p. I.p. S.P* Sap* S.F. S.F. G. 0TH£a •^OaC^ m • l.p# - X - S*p ■ Total H asdcoveii ^c.ms Total PscPi%rf Aaea Ifi Zcns S.F. (T S.F.B (X| to'si.yz- -f [|]IiSjSf2_ X WJ 1 i% k 4 f 1 A ftrp - L. WSICOVES oicuunos WfWS-ltcT -----V ,=«: (cucL. CH.) 0-75* 7S-2S0f 2S0 SCfl-lCCfl-iin*c* fjtlSTlMa lUilOCCvt^ !?♦ Zoh € ---- -------------41^ A. ' HCUSS ■■■., ^ i. Gas ;ig£ C. C.^IVCHAY 3. Sl£CWAl-K E.Patiq / CecK f.Lanoscaps ASSAS UM3ERLAIM BY . . PLASTIC SH£HTIN3 CAfV.A-^ ^•^^'^Toxhik UH5TH W1 - X . X iki SI Ji^. X X A _ X ^ X *Zo.r. T.gH ,<XI.<o S • F t WI5TH m 'io'-i 9.P* m s.r. I.p. m A S.F. • m S.r. •m s.r. .;„■ m S.r. m •s.r. s.r. u -. \'l^S.Pi • •s.r. •m s.r. • t • • •s.r. • •• • • ♦S.r* • '(,P s.r.• A ’ Total Ha .^ccove^i in Zo:i=. Total Pscpi=jr< A aea in Zcne __4^§;5nn?L s*p* n^o s.F. jA B \si?^ V |IJ_:iS7S2_ X100 - _2^» Ml • B. Ga A^-QS Z>7>.^ LENGTH Cr * A X SilDTM r^- w m ■ V' 17 _ *u m _________ mm X m X m • • — X m . ^<r • If m _«l«5 8 • ^ • C • I V A tS-yi*- 5>*r * Z2 ..■? ^ ^D. Sidewalk ,.. ^ — * G>7 ^ .T sj: 1 'S'=r c. Patio / necK IS*-2.ZO De<-^ Cf aseas 3Y PLASTIC SH£=TIN(3 G. OtHc S • •• I 1 - _.■ X2i_. S.Pi ^ X •-, S.F. • • ___'••■’ V ^ ' X _ - X - P V ■ . M '2^*5-, S.F. •2L‘sr • i__3ar S.Pi X . • • •S.F. .P. • P. .P .P. • P • .Pi .F. »Pt ,P .P ..w ^ • * Total Ha .?ocoy £.=i in Zone Total PROPSsrf A h?a in Zone *r __s.P. ZlSiZii.^ s.F. X 1 HABDCOVSR CAICULATIO?! WaxSHEcT „r»K* lOHi: (C..CLI CMS) 0-;5- 75-250' 250-SOO' ^0^^ Existing Hapocovm in Zcme y M1 Vo VAmom aiCUUTlOH «0RX3H£ET alTlACic iCMf: (cixcLS ons ) 0-75* 75-250* 250-500*(50Q-1C^ IxiSTiHG lUxOCOVE? IM ZCNE - Ymsz ^ H 9 "SCi J.F. LfJtGTM WI2TM U> V \~Z____- a.». \1- X _ I. GH.W32 _ c. DmvjiiAr ’^5T-7cy 1 ^ m 0.. SlCEWALK «<c <r ST 1 __IC E. £Atro/D eck ,1.% F.Landscape areas UMDESLAIN BY : . PLASTIC SHEETING . (^-1 V or Q. Other vs; X__ A. ■ Total Hardcover in Zcn £ Total Psc?£RrT Assa in Zone ^ S* F • <^oo S.F. $.F. S.F. S.F •t.f, S.f. S.F. __. i.P. n?- s,?. S.F. .S.F. SZllZM-.-rfB ICO - _ifi^— S.F. [T on O S.F. IX TO: FRQ.\I: OATEs ^5. Flijiiiiiii CoBimmkwi Mciabefi Kdm Moonr. City Adniaiumat kjxas A Mabusth. fcwMmt & Ixmm My IS. 1993 SiTUECT: f IS41 Robcii A km Sum, 2390 Wa«rtown • Skctcli Plan Ibr a Plfopoiid Sutidhitioo Appliciitts havr filed a skci^ ptai profmal of rifM ftsiJrniut ton widkin the RR-IB Zoninf Dotnet Tte purptm of a <^kctcli plan review is to proviile the applicana the opfmnunity to revKw their proposal for lAevek^ment and ic recei^^ inpui from both Ptanmitg Commissaofi and rtafT before eipemive devekfwient plans are drawn up in the filing of fonnaJ applicatioa. N<> aictioii is required by the Ptanmni, Conunissiofi. Roaew Fthihe H. Ap^iam filed a ttvee ke pretiminafy ptil; ap^icaiiori al the end of 1991 and received approvil. The owners and applicana have now filed for an eight lot ISibdivtsiofl. The foUowing ordinances are pettinent for this review: Section 11 10. Subds. 6. 7 and S. yj<t of F-\iiihit< A * Application B * Location Map C - Engineer s Review 7/13/93 iD - Topognptuc Map E - Watcnhnl Map F - Wetl^s Map 0 • Map of Preferred Road \IignjmelB! H - Resolution #3045 11/25/91 1 - Suff Sketch Plan ! . Sketch Plan Basic Review Commenis Concerning Layout of Plat I^oa 5 and 6 do not meet the required lot width of 2(X)’ at the rear of the 50’ setback. Each lot is shown meeting tla required 2-acres in area exclusive of pind areas. The holding pond shown on Lot 4 will probably be two to three times larger than the pond sliown for retention needs will be intensified with the development of an eight lot plat as opposed to the original three lot plat, ftiilding envelopes have been defined for each lot. All lot areas must be exclusive of road right of-way and drainage casement areas over holding pools and drainageway/swales. 1 iaaa$ Ftit #1M3 Jb*v 15. I99J fm2 ftqMTciJ tetback from ill newly proposed iol lifics R«id/Ace^ t^ii^ All access from propetty daH be frow plai letd. .So indivhliial oifb c«j shall be albwcd onto W«cno«n Road. The road cwilol ii shown as a cul^ sac roadway at an ^•pioxinate 1.000* in leofth Review Exhibits B. C and G. dnnaf the 19^1 review, e was rrcowimetwkd ai the tme of the Conprehmivc Dnelcfnicni of the propeny that hmire access be provMkd la Gohkn View Drmr to the immcdu« wrest through the llanaKi Hstaies itodevelopeil northern lot as shown on map. Exhibit G The nwd icrvini subdivision nuv be served by a temporary cvl-de*sac at north e shown but should be planed with a htfure 50* road! exrensfon to west as shown on stafTt sketch. Exhibtt I Ptr Sectfcm 11.33, Subd. 4. Typaral Section, rond at eighi umes must be paved at a mtmrmim 28 ’ width. Rood may be platted as a rural or urban section Rural sectiofii involve gravel ditches and an urban rectnm involves the imtallation of curbing Urban sccticms require a trummum paved width to the inside of the curb of 28*. If subdivision was at seven or less, a niral section allows paved wklth at 24*. Drainage Review Exhibit E. the majority of property a kxated within a watershed ihit dr.iimi directly to Tarugcr Lake. A small wiithwest poftiofi of the property alor^ Watertown drains to the sewth vu the French Creek drainageway eventually to Ma.vwell Bay Rev iew Exhibit B. the majomy of the runoff drains to the northwest through Daniels lomg Lake Heights property under W'iilow Road to wetland areas and south eventually to Tanager Lake. The Cit> receives major complaints from the property owners within the Daniels subdivision complaining of runoff that drains through their yards. The loww drainagewav ; at the siwitbeast comer coilccts in an underground drainage tile that outlets onto the street eroding the bituminous paving and cr. anng maintenance problems for the City. Review Kackberry Hill Road and note condition of the blacktop Go northward up Hackberry Hill to the last house on the west and follow the drainage path that flows to the east along north boundaiy of the park and under W'illow Road. It is best to access property along the cast side along the old farm road. As you walk northward, observe the drainage ditch within the northern lots. It will be necessary for the dev'clopcr to complete certain storm drainage improvements in the area. As engineer ’s report notes, the holding pond must be designed such that storm water will be released at the rate that runoff leaves the property in the uralcvclopcd state. The pond must be designed with an outlet control to store a 100 year rainfall event. The Engineer recommends the installation of berms along the cast side to control runoff to desired retention areas. The majority of the lots will drain to the northeast except for Lot 1 and part of Lot 2 where berm will be installed along the cast lot line to direct drainage out to Watertown Road. On your inspection, review ite condition tomni Ftiff tm3 hiiy IS. 1993 fkfs 3 of Mb»§c facilitto in W^attovB Read. There art m drakage dnrfcri wr Aigngc^ayi defined on tidier tide of roadway h nay l« oeceaary lo de««lop a dranafa dn^h roantiig raM toWiOimiUMd Tint wifl alkTia* *f obviow draoiiir pio9teni on Ul 13 al corwf of Hacibenr »id Willoar Creel; Watenbed District, the pend must be dcaifMd «o deal vah qualay of rwoff and hmctioo as a wet pend comtd O^ sednncni and the pottdde tieanneai of ninoff The Enftocer fccoomefeis ^ henm and swales be tmulkd idooi the cast lot bne to acineve the detotd piaa for saonn water cooiroi rhis will m)uirc at a mtfMWMfw a 25' casemria afong the e«i tide He also rccoweicnds that the drtinafe swak be tmulkd toward the well to dial a nafiinl stand of trees be allowed to rmam aloiq the east kM tine iUview Ethibn F. there are no apparcni dcstfntted wetland ihowii «>q die vctLind maps of the Rdijcct property. Applkaai’ insist determine if pond on Lot S shall tefve m a frfirWiofi area for water ntooif. Park DrdictCkMi Fee Applicants shcsiid be advised lhai upon prcliminaiy approval of the Cosintil of the prclinunary mbdivtsKm, th« the plat idall be refened to the City Assetsor to determine the fair market vahic of the property at its undevekiped The park dedication fee shall be 8% of d»t value It has already bien determined by the Park Cooumsaion that the U.nd is not suitable for park dcvciopaient and has asked for park dedkatioo fee monies in liea ot dedication of land. SqMk Test Information Upcwi the filing of the preliminary plal, the City musl also receive septic test information for each of ihe proposed Iocs providinf both a primary and altemak site for a S-bedroom capacity. The preliminary subdivision ajqilkratton will not be complete and will not be accepted if the septic information is not submitted by the tteadlinc date with the subdivision information. IMrcctiTCS fn* Applicants in the Filing of the Preliminary .Subdivision Application Applicants to provide the following with the preliminary^ plat application: 1. Preliminary plan to designate the following: lx>t tines platted showing building envelopes of each lot. Based on |ireliminary grading and draiiuge plans to t» submitted with formal application, retention pond areas should be defied ami areas excluded from dry buiidable of each lot. Applicants should define a drainage easement at a minimum width of 25’ along : 4 agcways tiing cast :omcr of and must ment and installed 'cquire at swale be le east lot and maps retention cil of the nc the fair be 8% of ot suitable >n of land. iformation 5-bedroom « accepted formation. firelim inary i, retention of each lot. f 25’ along Znnim Fde flS43 Wy 13. 1993 iPlfB 4 2 3. l^g^fidify of ^foprfty iirfMi. Thti ifea must be eisrteded frcm dry buikiabli! lot A. Applicants ’ surveyor to desigifitte tod on Dmfs Lom Lake lletghu as obitf east kx tks of property. LocMe noftfeefn loi of llallMMl HsUdSes 10 iIk west. B. Roid oitBoi to be shown extending to west per Exhibtt L C. Cul 4e-sac need not be plaaed but City lo obtain temporary access and trtiltfy easemtm over portiom of a ten^iorary cul-de-sac that iniefscct Uxs adiaceni to cul-dr-sac. The City will extinfuish all interest in these easements at the time a through road ts msuUed to the w^. A preliminary gradii^ and drainage plan must be submitted with preliminary plafi inform .It K>« as drainage issues ctearfy tsive an tn^wet on ihei design of ihet division. Define swaks. bermi. retention pond, outlef conffols, etc. Complete septic testify for all proposed lots. This includes both alternate aixl piinc^ test sues for 5-bedrocra capacuy. Former test for Lots 1 and 2 will be iiccep^ if test sites setbKk from rear k« lines. 4. IDctcrminaiioo of prenminary plat appiicafion fee: A. Preliminafy plat application $500.00 - $325.00 plus $25.00 fter lot (7 * $25.00). B Private road easement $1,100.00 ($600.OQ base plus $.50 per 1,000 lineal feet}. l&ptic fee $350.00 ($50.(X) per each new lot). Total due $1,950.00. 5. Others recommended by Planning Commission. cin or OROHO > soBoivisioii jlrri>l07ioM. 4mt 4M ^ imrEUTT LOCATlQIi M:-l'S SitR JUWr«*» Zi'f^ £^Jdrfira^t^ AQJA. sj-nf-u yr rrcip«rty Xdentif icatlcm Kcrfcer (P.l.D.I //f-u—jtt— lFl«iis« ch#ck on« • Pro|>«rty abstract or torrvns? Attach lagal daaerlptlcn to application Am^ICAMT Phono (hciia ) ^7 lUM ffu Tf.~. ea /Vv^< AA»»ri>w»* (wert)_il2iii2£iL_ e______cityi /ir/‘.t‘iry.-----iipi sstft ^,)Miiiui (if different th^n applicant) Phono (ho*o)- -Y7 tt„Z,S £ f i’-.... UASLe ^ T ret<IT Phono ivotk) Address: Citv: (attach ixit if »oro than onoJ Zip: ^SJS€ SXSTIliG LA8D D8B Nusbor of Tax Parcols Devolepmont Siso /?72-Acros Dry Land Acros Wet Land TL .-ry, ProsoQt Coo (check)21 Acros Total, all parcols ^ Residential: no. of Other (spocify)_ _ _ _ _ _=-2^-2' Present Soning District wiTiwiT ix V • irV i^LiVPT-JH^S tOU 9277040 LO^l ROl Tlin 0j>'25,'9 PKJPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no now building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites EJumber of Building Sites: 2. I. Existing Un^ts Now Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Units per HAcres r/ /Za Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)X Residential Other (specify) 1 ^rr^ -- wC- MlBUfOl MATHUAL MEC&SARY rOK c PLBTB FKB1.1M1BAAT AmaCATIOH 1. 3. 3. CoTOl«t«d Appllcati<m FormPrcllMlfMiry Plat inforaatlon on certificate of Survey. Certified Prooerty 0%nier» List of o«n©r* within 350' (you »u#t obtain this ii«t fro« Hennepin County Cepartment of Finance gk-603 Covt Center 3€8*327II. ' ^ Am an addendua to thi» application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Xoning Departnent that Preliiiinary Plat Application ia SOTing Official's Signature_ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date- - - - - - - - - - 1. Paysient of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessaents). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or nylar copiaa of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Casesients, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agrsssisnt and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is caaplete. Zoning Official's Sicnsturs_ _ _ _ IPSBS Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II t III) Subdivision of s Lot Lin© Rearrangement Prellfliinary Review (Class I 4 II Subdivision) $200.Od 300.00 Prelininary Review (Class III & all .non-residentlal) 325,00 ♦25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 ♦ Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning CossRisslon and Council necessary to process this application and fuj^tjier agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. plicant's Signature Date 7.? ^(^wner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Cosmission Meeting. Planning Commisaion Meetings are neld on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Councile If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangementx to have an authorized agent attend in your place and tc advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 . SS F. ffS if. 23 b T*-jr -- «« • M» tfisei 7 -i:l y j®JK_e \ Sisf i it h ** ^• Vr* ***^ <eoc<»4vrti cm •,5^ Vir*<i5i' I 'iZ. 2 <7^(£^,u • •i «•«»i i ^ 4i *<M imtM * £ • •A*»»4 » i0r*»> i»r« I (•1 <3J> • ••- nnau .1 <|P1 ‘ ■4} I (5P sze» ifiu I I ih m t > il. N. (M ^ I IM I2E3! .IM M# I ;®: [Jj Ss ?cr§f-^ • imrnsr ii4i •* " S33 , — • • -r 7 •' • T| • • t i f *4. (•t til ♦ 1 •JLi-l.L. rnmrnmm^mm LiakS sta«i Xif^ oiSTttci aouKiMT StMOL SiSIitlCI 30WOMT MieriKo 3i:T»icf 3»m)**t ’• *<<*•? KMCftN CMIT. tfl^tf4Sdr^ su«if*u or ^aic j#A«id OfPiUTKNf OF fWfWTf ri. ^'’ll 1C "f r 13 r»•:f «3i iz.i ».oa Bonestroo Rosene AnderllkA Assoclat#i i«Stn#«fi « AfciMftcu Jjfy a I993t e^ft C • I I 1r^ •t • ••• M •f •« •f €•* • • • 3» • %f t *«« Nl f ^ •! ^ ^ « e • r C •• M •f •« •t • « •t •t mm<m9 M M« • H • <• Qi^f «) •§ •f fM i i €mrnm M f •? «•»§ •« i mrnrn m t TiUrt •« » «t Ms. Jeaasc A. Mibttsth, Bttildiag tad Zceiaf Admiaatratsf City of Orofi o Posi O0kf Boi (^ Cry«u] Bay. Misccscu ^5323i R*- Thfff Slaf Tnickicg Sabdfviiisj Fik So. U9-1M Dear JeiM#. w, bav« rmewtd the prapoHd iuMi.i,ioa (or Throe Sur TrMe»i.| located sordi of Watertown Road to ibe Southtiit Quarter of the Southeaii Quarter of Section 33 There art Mvcral isiues that seed to be addrcued re|ardin» the draiaaie. itfeef aligBineoi and eiACDcntf on the subdiviitoa. Th^aiuge for thia property ia an imporunt iaeut dat to the fact that much of the i^off «rwt^ driiaa t^rly throo|h the developed propertief in tie Dtakls Long &^e Hetihto Additioo. The atorsi water runoff to the enat ahoold be controUed to that »«icb la Ibt uidcvclopad itau. He propoied boMisi poad iho«B oa Let 4 Houid be deaigncd with aa outlet coouol to store a 100 year rainfaU event with a restricted ouffkiw. The constnictioo cf a berm will be aeceaaary aJoof the east property line as part of the pond design. Drainage iwaJes shOTld be constructed along property lines. The drainage awile alone »oved west to miniaiie tree removal. The easting ditch on Lois 1 A 2. Blo^ 2 of Daniels Long Lake Heights Additon wiU have to be evaluated and possibly relocated'regraded. The drainage on Lot I and part of Lot 2 should be directed south *c minimize the drainage impacts at the northeast comer of the site. A berm along the east property line ^ be necesaaiy to direct the drainage to Watertown Road The ditches and anatiBg culvert for Watertown Road will have to be evaluated and possibiy upgraded for drsinage issues on the subdivision, we recommend Chat a prclifflinary grading plan be submitted prior to preliminary plat approval. f;J •!« tJlt The propQKif to tpfwartgvitt^ tOOO ft«t to tos^ v^toefc to ite toafti ilowtd for m ftktoiittoi p&bik itrut. Wt neoaiesd that tha ttraat b« fciafitclid to Oofaica Vtov Mve, tkros|h dta c^tovtlcpcd partioa of Haltm Eitatci» to pf^ddt • looytd ttrett asd • siort iattfratrd itrtet arttess for t&ii area. The of« itrttt ihoald b« coaM«itd to aecordaftca wiih Cof Staadirdi Dratoaft tad itility taacacaii ilioold b« provided 5 fett wt4« ttoof ^ lot licet aed 10 feet wide ila| tha f^opoMd ri|lo^««ray tad WatcrtaNi^ Road. eaitgif sli> ihoald ha prwidtd for tha pooda oa Lot I aad Let 4. la additioo, • 25 foot aid# dratoaga ttaamcat akag tha eaat pr^ny liaa ihoold ha ^*oiddad to auiiataia tha dratoaga poalta and hcmi dtacotaed PlaaM e^aet ea lai thto o|8ef if you ha«t la) q^tifioni rtgardiag thii Buutr. Youri very trely, BONESTROO. ROSENE ANDERUK A ASSCQATES. INC Shawo D. Gustafioa* F.E *J 4. / ~ tr*. '1. - •' il- •■V, cV* '•,:,'iU •« " V • i *1 ' •* i% -j .. ki ^;h: . I ' f '- ': ItM • ‘:# >• • ' I t > ■ -:- : ; ■ .,: i:e|.■ • -li* .,,„ •S'.*':; fi i v^Scf iPi> r i " ’ • i I . • 'r/‘;: * I ; I .♦** > Vj*.t, ■! ♦» ' 1 • ft 1 ^ , ■• •j?.' i -. t•*■! 1 ‘ »•■ .4’- IP • ?r.•%rrr»i ‘1• >•*) •* \ ••tk. f *y *• ‘'t' i‘^(r j ’ r-T: -tr^y * '. I* ‘ V t , / c J; -t. .« % * ^ 'r* *■ ^ i ^ I a •s iods t'l •isSI ^ w3JS 5^-ni ■<o* < i«S2| W 21113QO</>0 ii^ic/)” ^COi. V \ - \ \ » t A-.., . \. . >..\.M ; V A \ .•• .* / / \ • not >v -1} % “ . 'r "!\ dip -,-l\ _____i I. \ S \ !! r WATERTOWtJ C c ' ' §/§•'•• / . _» • —r-i— RQ^D 4, i • >: I r r*.» h f r'f,; » I ^' :< I -• .. ^ I v;- ■f * IfPII IfJ H J.' f » m r.? V -j !S S h fc#« ill if . 11.1.1? . '■ ;!|:f ■!-:.;..[i i[ If i F. ?; j 11 11 ■ W : ! ! I ? f • • «• » .• . • • ■ ' .• • ,* *.'» • *. • , V «*< f I ' • ••<."» J •’ ^ k - ^ >• Trf ^-^*1» V •!i: U -t I 1 '•■' u?; ^.-. r.:. ! • p iS. L‘ f; t‘ ^ . /»■V:‘tmm&_ livvvi- \ LONG LAKE _ LONG LAKE |. * V .V. :i3.7c.f.s. tfeSiARO LA 60.0 c.f.s / ANl: •X .8C.\s- ^ENl'rRAl. L-f UJ ! \ o TL-11 LA. FRL- 1 / / !;5,« FRL- 3 !TL-13 58.4 c 14.6 c.f^ FRL-4 \ \ FRl-sS § \ ./■! 49.6 c FOX .! - 3 V -7 il ■h^C.f.S- TL-5 \ ( 9 §, o <?; '^.lC.F.S. L_ BB-10 TL-18 TL-19 french '^ r-LAKE. -- \ W' \ \ <• %.V :5.0 c.F.b. ^ /& TANAGER LAKE TL-20 92.2 c.f.s MINNETONKA c!CRYSTAL PROSPECT wf ■3.5 C.F.S.' SMITH BAY B 180^5 cF.s: * CLBr2 Of r:::^r BRA( i5P.3^ C.F.S |U> -** ••■' V--- \^' L ^ _A ■ • • • \ it iCi •. 9 ^ p •Ls^, rri # , ^ ’jp«:Z*4*.'>?>'•:- I .*• • • •' 1' •• m f 1^ At 0^. jp . ' ^ # p ^. >:■ f' > / I ^ !f4;. V* •► p «ap»^ A'• « ■ i • • j%i»97r >*Tfm •'^ » ' • .*;-^ A— •■» * j • , . %n '•-.‘V’^' ^ - •• 4 •% «k f. *'• iL • ' * i * c 1) • fU •* * *v.',^ *, ' ^ ss s * ^» ? ji) r 2j» »«M ;y; U ’ sV^ . J ’) * ^ - ••a • # * ' ' . ^ ♦*.*-‘n, V a-»«. ••• jk-^’' ti *: «^J*. ii-.* -‘T ^ A. A m m X A • •»• • • ili-tn; -IA41-.- -*'-• *, ^IA4i^---- * -• ■• 'JLu--. V • 'jraivf t* v: * • ■• r *~ . •" . ^ . ~ •> -aJ * «• • •••** • <• •' Iff *: L-<. • ’■# ■' • •• :irmcmc*tTrT eve 1 hI • r- ' / 'l ^ ^ “Tv " ' m A. > • A .3^ / ^ .n\ : ^5ur: r ?. m e-H II ft il S33 > . * I • I I I • . • •(•t *«f //5f3 STOAi oisniicT an#CA«i S04XI. OIST/IICT aom)^f UdXl^O OISIAtCr SXM)A«T pC0gftn camtf, \ V fuaic ifffvia ^ OCfuintfNr OF u* ^ arc if o o ► •>CITY of ORONO VesU.^'- RIRRUTIQIfi OP tH£ CIT r COUNCIL HO 1Q4^ A USOLOTlfai CKAtfriMG mmiaiuiiT Amovjo. rtm a FLAT AT 3590 HATISTOM MAO riLS M. lotJ miBAAAS. 0ob«rt P. Saeis (horoinaftor *th« d«v«lcper*> on Augutti 33, 1991 filed a fonaal aubdiviaion application vith the City for approval of o i lot roaidential plat of property legally deacribed aat The weat quarter of the Southeaat quarter of the Southeaat quarter of Section 33, Townahip lit North, Kang# 33 »eat of the 5th principal •eridian. AND That part of aaid Southeaat quarter of the Southeaat quarter which Ilea Caat of the Meat quarter of aaid Southeaat quarter of the Southeaat quarter, and which liea weat of the Seat 20 acrea of aaid Southeaat quarter of the Southeaat quarter. (hereinafter "the property*)! and mmiBAS, after due published and aiailed notice in accordan.?e with Minnesota Statuea 4€2.35S et. aeq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codea, the Orono Planning C^uilBsion held a public hearing on Septeaber IS, 1991, continued to October 21, 1991 at which tinea all peraons deairing to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to apeak thereon; and M&BBBAS, at their regular Meeting held on ,'loveaber 12, 1991, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Robert F. Suess, noting the foll:wlng findings of fact: i.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Reaidential Zoning District requiring e miniiaxun of 2 acres of contiguous dry bulldable land within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of approximately 19.7 acres excluding Watertown Road, none of which currently is listed aa designated wetland. 3* The proposed plat contains 3 lots each meeting or exceeding the 2.0 acre mlnimua lot area requirement. 4. Proposed Lot 2 requires a variance because it does not have the required frontage on a public roadway. Page 1 of 6 •^OA, o o » • <6, CITYofOROXO Rr50iUTT0«i OP THf CITY COUNCU. HO 304^ 5. C. 7. K 8 Lots 1 SAd 2 sro proposed to front on and accost drlYoway to bo coattrocted wltliin a SO* outlot futuro doYolopawnt of m privato rood. to • privot# intondod for The oslstiD^ zrosldonco Yithin tot 3 is propcsod to aointoiii its drivovoy sceoss directly to ^tsrtcvB Rood. Pecsuto this it tochnlcolly s 3 lot subdlvitloh. o varisfico it required in order to slloe Lots I and 2 to access via a orivato driveway in Outlot k, rather than requirinq the construction of a paved private road and cul^de^soc. Grantinq 'f this variance is appropriate becauset The location of the qaraqe servinq the esistlng residence, a?^ the layout of existinq buildinqa on the property* would result in the need to construct a driveway 300* in length end destroy certain trees and smenitiea of the existing residence site. b.The sxistinq driveway location ssrvinq the existinq residence accesses Wsterto%m Road at a iocaticui that is not hasardous based on vertical or horisontal sight lines. because the property exists in two separata tax parcels* the applicant could have taken advantage of a t%ro-st#p procaas of lot line raarrangmant and platting •*hJ ch would have resulted serely in the creation of two building lota in nearly the identical layout as the current proposal* without the requireaient for construction of e privats road. Orono codes allow a shared driveway access for up to two residences. d.Ouilot A* while proposed to be developed at this time for aerely a driveway sarving two new building sites* is located so as to he available for future axtanalon to serve the future development of Lot 3. It is intended that Outlot A and the driveway constructed within it shall remain in the ownership cf the owner of Lot 3. An access easement will be required over Outlot A in favor of Lots 1 and 2. The developer will be required to execute covenants to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of the driveway and Outlot A* and to dei'ine future financial obligation at such time that the driveway is upgraded to private or public road status. Page 2 of 6 o o GITYof OROXO i't ^RUOLUTIQN DP THE CITY COUNCIL NO. K4S _______ 9,It im thm City** intent that any futur* d*v#lop«ant of th* proparty that craataa additional rcsidantlal lot* using Outlet A for acres* will trlggar upgrade of Outlet A to currant road standards. Th* davalopar will be raqulrad to grant to th# City an underlying road and utility aasaxent over Outlet A. 10.It i* intended that there be no direct curb cut* or access for Lots 1 and 2 directly onto Vatertovn Road except via Outlet A. further, it is intended that no building permits for Lota 1 and 2 be issued until the driveway serving both lots is coapleted. 11.The applicant has provided a grading and drainage plan for the property which will accomodate the current development of two building sites and which can be upgraded and revised as future development of Lot 3 occur*. Vhe City Engineer ha# preliminarily approved this plan with minor revisits. 12.Right-of-way for Watertown Road of 33* shall be dedicated on the plat. 13.Per the recomnendatioo of the City Engineer, a drainage easement shall be grantedi over the existing pond on Lot 3. 14.Lots 1 and 2 have been demonstrated to contain suitable sites for primary and altarnata drainfielda to Bcrve the proposed single family residences. 15.Single family residences can be constructed oni without the need for further variances. Lots 1 and : HOW, THRRBPORB BB IT RBSOLVBD, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Robert F. Suess at 2590 Watertown Road per the survey attached as Exhibit A hereto by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., and grants a variance for Lot 2 which does not front on a public roadway as required, and grants a variance to allow de/elopment of a private driveway ra »er than a privatw road in Outlet A to serve Lots 1 and 2, subject to the following conditions: 1.Outlet A shall remain in common ownership with Lot 3 in order to facilitate future development of Lot 3. 2.An access easement shall be granted over Outlet A in favor of Lots 1 and 2. Page 3 of 6 i t m- 4,O^Xo o •4 U V ^ *• »> f. 4* ' J * ' «>' GITYofORONO RISOLUTiOti O^ THf CITY COUJiCtL liO. 1045 ________ 3. 4. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Tha mppllcant shall exacuta covanants to dafina raa|>onalbilitf for cooatructlon and ■aintenanca of tha drivaaay in Outlet A, and to dafina futura financial obligation of tha oanara of Lota 1* • and 3 at such tiaa that tha drive^y ia upgraded to a private or public road statua. Any futura davalopaant of tha property that craatas additional raaidantial lota using Outlet A for acceia «ill trigqar tha ijpqra(3!e of Outiot A to tha road standards in '*t at that; futura time. Tha applicant shall grant to tha City an underlying road and utility easeicent over Outlot A. Standard pariaatar drainage and utility easementa rhall ba granted over the entire plat. Drainage improveinenta to the property shall be constructed per the drainage and grading plan as approved by the City Engineer» subject to a Devalopar'a Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private driveway and drainage improvement construction car begin as soon as the engineering plans for such improvements have been approved by tha City and the Developer's Agreement has been executed. Applicant shall pay the standard park fees for Lots I and 2 per the current Park Fee Ordinance. A drainage easement shall be dedicated on the plat over the existing pond in Lot 3 and over the retention nond area in tne northeast corner of Lot 3. Protection of drainfield sites via fencing shall be in place during construction of driveway and drainage improvements, and shall remain in place until the residences on Lots 1 and 2 are ccxnpleted. Dedication on the plat of 33' of right-of-way for Watertown Road shall be granted. Outlot A shall be given a new road name and address assa^giments for Lots 1 and 2 and shall be consistent with the north/south grid system. Page 4 of 6 H o iS. , \ CITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^0*^ Mo bnlldic9 poraits will b« Issuod until th* eonitruction at driveway and dralnacre loprovcEent* is coaplata. 14.Mo curb cut/accasa for Lots 1 and Matartown Roadl except via Outlet A. FINAL PLAt SUBMITTALS 2 will be allowed onto The following list of final subaiittalt aust be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the aonth: 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1**200». Drawing to Include: a. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Coffin and Gronberg* Inc. attached as Exhibit A hereto. b. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' ''i^e along all perimeter property lines and 5 ‘ each side of internal property lines. c. Designation and dedication of the existing pond and retention pond to be developed# as "drainage easements on the plat. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS reqxlired: a. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners# mortgaae holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c. Signed and executed Drainage Easement for the existing pond in Lot 3j blank area requiring description may be filled out as follows "over the drainage easement as shown on the plat of (plat name)". d. Signed and executed Developer’s Agreement and Letter of Credit for construction of the private driveway and drainage improvements. Page 5 of 6 /to o .V V • * V'> -'1 GITYofORONO RESOiUTION Of THE CITY COUKiCIl ,0 >04 S________ «. £. 5i^«d «Ad «Kecutc4 Boftd and Otiilti«» EasM«nt over Out lot A. tign«Ni and axacutad co*f«aantt d«f*alng raaponalbl 1 ity for construction and oalntananc* of tho drlYs«»ay in Outlot A, defining futurs financial obligations of offectsdi proporty camera at such tiiee that the driveway is upgraded to priests or public road status. g. Coaplstsd •Application for Privato Bond IMaia**. 3. ftBS I'V BB PAIDt a. Pinal plat fe# • $150.00. b. Legal rselew and filing fees of $150.00. c. Park Dedication Fee at the rats of <1 of the City Assesior's racoomsndsd fair narket value of the land prior to dcvelopsMnt. Such fee shall be deterained and paid prior to final plat approval. Too will receive written notification as soon as the fee is deteralned. Adopted by the Ci»f Council of the City of Orono» Minnesota at a regular ceeting held Moveiabei 25» 1991. Dorothy M./Hfillin, City Clerk /d V. A-if Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instruicent was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of November, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson a Dorothy M. Hall^n, Mayor a City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnecota municipal corporation and sale irstruaent was executed on behalf of th* City. «t mSwesota h.NNEPiN COUNTY My oomnrw Notary Public Page 6 of 6 \. fTti . ____r' I. - - !' ii j- ;-§:?> i 4 > * m te* -ntr/, -*.. • ' •. * If .i ’V •;:| b.v-* •*-r^ 'tVi . fT^ • % (V; :.v -i 'I# fl yr -v'’.. VvV' ' •ft. '.i^i':; '■ •' ;*-s 4»^i* ♦<» 1 i ‘ • • •. V •/ t- . •*. - 4 • • J, J / • • . * • N. •it* > : ,* *‘^' : •*.Vt. * i.S* 4 1 / I' ’ * • * 15':'“ -;* <•• T . F/.'v v> .f I' if( if - ;.. i.r.'. .i.'..:. i»Ss-{ If! III}! - i:'*-.- flp.! If •- • <. n i T—«Hil»ili<n1WMI •Mha Mk i« «^«i. Maw n «M«l •• «• Mk ^ ■II—IHMIkiiOml^iiHi Wlifcii^ r. — «MM«W«Mlal — MW—■■«• 0-mm —ki TMi —k—«•! I. W — —I aanMH w ttmm ■» i DRAWN BY REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION y///.A<Pos^/Aus £.ors UM€/n DESIGNED BY I hrn+t iTrtifv Bui Ihi* urn*) wj» In' mf <« “T*'.™ J""' mPf' vuMw. jnd Ihil I «m J ' Ihr Uwv k4 thr Sute u Mirii 5 CronbrTK MmfwioU home I27M C()|l!\ (.KcV’.l 0 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR THREE STAR TRUCKING IN TNC SC V4 OP THE SE V4 OP SECTION 33-11S-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA SCALE r-bo- DATE 8U-« JO»NO. <1 144- SHEET NO.