Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-17-1993 Planning PacketC
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MFEfING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present:Chair Charles Schroeder, Stephen Peterson, Candace Rowlette, Sandra Smith, Charles Nolan, Jr., Janice Berg, and Dale Lindquist. The following represented the City Staff: Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and Recorder Teri Naab. Edward Caliahan, Gabriel Jabbour and Charles Kelley were present. Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. He introduced the new members: Sandra Smith, Charles Nolan, Janice Berg and Dale Lindquist and expressed his appreciation to the outgoing members: Jeffrey Johnson, Maureen Bellows and Ed Cohen. (#1) #1821 MARGO WIRTJES, 3085 WATERTOWN ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 8:58 - 8:59 P.M. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Rowlette, to table Application #1821 for Margo Wirtjes, at the request of the applicant. Ayes 6, nays 0. Smith abstained. (#2) #1825 THOMAS L. MCCAHIHY, 2490 OLD BEACH ORAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 8:15 - 8:50 P.M. The Af fIdavit of Pub Iicat I on and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. McCarthy was present. Mabusth explained two options for development as outlined in the memo. She noted the City Engineer has requested that no new curb cuts be approved. She indicated the cede does not require a shared access for new developments off private roads and noted there is adequate width along the road for an individual curb cut for Lot 2.She proposed the only way to approve this -application without variances is to include the area within the 250-500’ setback area within the 75-250’ area and credit the driveway hardcover against the 75-250’ hardcover allowance of 25*. Applicant would have to maintain hardcover at 25*. She noted the applicant proposes hardcover at 25.1* within the 75-250’ setback area. She also r ,ted the shed at the shared lot line would need to be removed. Char t ■» 5;Smoot, 2665 Maple Ridge Lane, expressed strong opposition lo /he proposal and explained this is one of the principal wooded areas left in the area to help wit.h run-off. He presented a petition or opposition. He felt the existing house and lot were appropriate for the neighborhood. He added the applicant has not lived in the neighborhood yet and wishes to change it already. 1 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1825 - CONT. Dan Saklad, 2496 Old Beach Road, stated there is no way to develop this property without major destruction to the neighborhood. He noted the lane is only wide enough for one car. He expressed strong opposition to the subdivision. Mrs. Saklad questioned the zoning for the area. Mabusth replied this Is a one acre zoning district. She referred to a phone conversation with Karen Paulson, 2605 Maple Ridge Lane, who expressed strong opposition to the subdivision and concern for the loss of mature trees. Chair Schroeder read letters of opposition ^rom Kathy Madaris, 2480 Old Beach Road and Joyce and Keith Olson, 2510 Old Heach Road. Mabusth questioned whether the Commission would recommend that the drive be included in the 75-250’ area and hardcover calculations. She asked if they would consider either the granting of a hardcover variance for the narrow 20’ wide portion of the lot or consider this portion a part of the 75-250’ zone and require the applicant to reduce hardcover to 25X. Chair Schroeder questioned the buildability of Lot 2. Mabusth stated it is a buildable, non-riparian lot. Peterson asked the applicant his plans for this parcel. McCarthy said he would like to develop this property In the future. He noted the previous owner Indicated the vacant property provided little benefit. He stated he would like an opportunity to build on this parcel and only intends to enhance the neighborhood by doing so. Smoot stated alI other surrounding properties maintain at least one vacant acre. He questioned the need to subdivide at this time if the applicant does not propose to build right away. Rowlette questioned how a building on this property would affect the property at the lower elevation. She questioned whether a similar division has ever been approved. Mabusth indicated there has never been a division as such approved in the past as flag lots did not conform to standards. Flag lots are allowed based on the new lot width standards for lakeshore lots. ■* 1 ■/ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1825 - CONT. Paul Anderson, 2530 Old Beach Road, questioned why the Commission was considering ways to interpret the code to allow the division when they should be concentrating on why the proposal is necessary. He felt this vrou I d be a detriment to the neighborhood. Ha said construction of another residence along the drive would be make passage on the road difficult and create an unsafe condition. Chair Schroeder answered they are not trying to find a way to approve the division, but if this is a legitimate request they must consider all the facts. Peterson noted because the neighbors all have 2+ acres does not mean that this property must maintain that acreage. Saklad felt the division would be detrimental to the environment and create an unsafe condition. Rowlette stated they must concentrate on the pertinent issues, and added just because they do not want a development does not mean they can deny it if It mee«s aii rules and regulations. Smoot noted then unless the rules change, they car>not approve the division. Saklad questioned the hardcover issue. Mabusth explained that if approved, the appiicant would be required to remove much of the hardcover on the developed lot and would not be able to keep improvements on the lot as it exists now. McCarthy stated some of the required removals are not necessary I terns. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Chair Schroeder, to recommend denial of Application #182 for Thomas L. McCarthy, 2490 Old Beach Road, based on the lack of hardship and the application setting a negative precedent. Ayes 7, nays 0. Chair Schroeder called for a recess from 8:50 to 8:58 p.m. (#3) #1820 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, NORTH ARM ACCESS - CONDITIONAL USE PF.RMIT/VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:10 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. W«s. irv.^r— S‘ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1820 - CONT Mabusth explained The County proposes the replacement of an existing wooden seawall with steel. She noted the permit has been issued and the repairs have been completed. The County was unaware that a new conditional use permit would be required and thought any repairs would fall under the previously approved conditional use permit. She pointed out the major issue with this application is the question of storm water management affecting the quality of run-off to the lake from the parking lot. She noted the City would like to see something in place prior to the 1994 boating season and referred to three options recommended by the City Engineer. The County is agreeable and staff will work with them to determine which option is most viable. She suggested the Watershed District should also be asked to covenant. Nolan suggested approval be conditioned upon on-going maintenance of the area. Mabusth explained that is currently being done by the County. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1820 for Hennepin County Department of Environmental Management, North Arm Access, approving a conditional use permit and variance for the repair of an existing seawall, per staff’s recommendation. Ayes 7, nays 0. (#4) #1822 MARK PRUETER, 3215 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:11 - 7:34 P.M. Tne Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Prueter were present for this application. Mabusth explained the applicants request side setback, and hardcover variance for an addition to the rear of the existing residence, and an average lakeshore setback variance to allow replacement of an existing lakeshore deck proposed at 18x10.6’. The deck area will be reduced. Mr. Prueter stated they hope to make this their permanent residence, but need more living space for future family additions. He pointed out the lot narrows at the rear and the house was constructed prior to adoption of the current zoning ordinances. There is no additional land available on either side and the neighbors do not object to the project. He testified that the walkway from the house to the garage is necessary because of ponding in this area, and he hopes to address this issue. i MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1822 - CONT. Rowlette asked if it is possibie to fili in this area. Mabusth said they wiil need to add some fiil with the addition, and the applicants hope to look at ways to redirect the drainage. She noted they propose the removal of the sidewalk along the side of the house, tut because of the Iimited area to direct drainage, tiling may be necessary. She referred to concerns regarding accessibility for emergency vehicles, ana pointed out there is a 13’ setback from the structure on the western lot, and an approximate 4’ setback from the grade-level deck on the eastern lot. Chair Schroeder asked the applicants if they had considered maintaining the existing setback on the eastern side. Prueter said they considered an upward expansion, but that did not provide the necessary living space. This proposal allows for the most economical solution to add living area. Mabusth noted emergency vehicles can go over grade-level deck structures, that Is why the ordinance does not require them to be set back further from the lot line. Nolan suggested the proposal could be reduced by 2’. Prueter said the addition needed to be that size to accommodate the hallway and still allow for a reasonable expansion. Rowiette stated she was happy with the reduction of the deck and the west side lot line setback, but was concerned with the encroachment into the eastern side lot line setback because of the access and drainage issues. Prueter pointed out there is a fire hydrant at the rear of the property where they access the drive from the east which provides access to the detached garage. Chair Schroeder stated that helps to some degree but would feel more comfortable maintaining the 9.6’ eastern side setback. Nolan indicated if the addition were reduced oy 2’, the property would remain w'thin the existing hardcover calculations, and felt the Impact would be minimal on the room sizes. Chair Schroeder explained they not only have to take Into consideration the comments of existing neighbors, but must try to consider concerns of ootential new neighbors. r. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE »1822 - CONT It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to approve Application #1822 for Mark Prueter, 3215 Crystal bay Road, approving setback, hardcover and average setback variances for an addition to the rear of the existing residence and a deck, subject to conditions set forth in staff’s memo, and conditioned upon a drainage plan being provided. Ayes 4, nays 3. Smith, Nolan and Rowlette voted nay. Mayor Callahan questioned how access is gained to the property. Prueter answered he thought he had an access easement running parallel to the railroad tracks. (#5) #1823 MARGE ROSSING, 130 CYGNET PLACE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:37 - 8:14 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Marge Rossing was present. Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a 20x28’ addition to the north side of the house, and a 26x38’ detached garage which meets the 10’ separation setback from adjacent structures. There is no hardcover or structural coverage problems. Rossing explained the addition is to accommodate the care of her brother. The detached garage is needed as the existing attached garage will become a part of the residence. Peterson quest Ioned what will be stored in the new garage and noted construction equipment on the property during his inspection. Rossing stated the equipment was there to facilitate the clean up of the property, and none will be stored on the property. Mabusth noted the encroachment onto the Wirtjes property. Rossing noted those items have been removed. Peterson questioned the need for an additional garage. Rossing noted the large detached garage is storage area for boats. 4 r PJfc' MINUTES OF THE OPONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1823 - CONT. Clair BIoemendasI, 145 Cygnet Place, testified that the property Is an eyesore in the neighborhood and has been for many years. She expressed concern that this proposal would only add to that condition. Rowlette questioned the normal size of a three stall garage. Mabusth stated a three stall garage is typically 28 to 30’, and the proposal Is oversized. She noted the existing garage exterior is rot finished. Rossing indicated they hope to do so this summer. Smith inquired as to how long the garage has been uncompleted. Rossing answered two years. Berg asked who the contractor is for the proposal. Rossing said her sons would be doing the addition. Nolan asked about the materials to be used on the addition. Rossing stated the garages and addition will be sided with the same material as the house. Rowlette questioned whether there are time limitations or construction. Mabusth indicated the permit requires an inspection to be made at least every 6 months or the permit will expire. Rossing indicated she had not been contracted by the BuiIding staff prior to last week regarding the completion of the existing garage. Rowlette said she understood the neighbors’ complaints and suggested screening along the road. Peterson asked if the driveway has been Included in the hardcover calculations and noted its considerable size. Mabusth indicated that was included, but added it is appropriate at this time to control the use of the grass for oarking of vehicIes. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1823 - CONT. Bloemendaal noted there currently is screening along the roadway, but due to the season changes, only helps part of the year. She stated many times there are several vehicles parked on the property for extended periods of time, including long transport vehicles. Mabusth inquired if there is a business being run out of the home. Rossing answered there is but the equipment other than a van is stored off-site. She noted sometimes her other son wi Ii stop by with his dump truck. Berg asked if a certificate is issued upon completion. Mabusth answered oniy with new residentiai construction, and a final would only be required for this project. Peterson noted if the permit expires, that only ensures the City that work will not continue until another is issued, and not that the project will continue. Chair Schroeder expressed concern about the use of the garages. Mabusth expressed the difficulty of policing individual properties. She questioned where the equipment from the existing attached garage will be stored until the new garage is completed. Rossing said she proposes the construction of tiie garage pi ior to the addition. Nolan felt they should require a screening plan. Mabusth noted the applicant in earlier discussions had alluded to the construction of a berm along the roadway and the planti.g of evergreens, but because It would be in excess of 100 cubic yards of till, a conditional use permit is necessary. Rossing noted the scrub trees along the roadway on the second lot need to be removed. Lindquist suggested they request a landscape plan be presented to Council along with the application and that the project be approved in phases. 8 1 -1 MINUTES OF the ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1823 - CONT. Rossing said she would like to commence with the addition as soon as possible, but noted she does not want to construct the berm at this time, but would like permission to place the fill from the addition where the berm would be located. Mabusth clarified that the Planning Commission would like to combine the landscaping with this request and that she could not stockpilefill f rom construction wIthout a condi11ona I use permit. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Peterson, to approve ApplU,ation#1823 for Marre Rossing, 130 Cygnet Place, for rear and street setback variances to construct an addition to the existing residence, on the hardships that the lot is an unusual shape and the house was constructed prior to adoption of the existing ordinance, subject to the project being staged beginning with the completion of the existing detached garage, and second the proposed detached garage bn completed prior to commencing with the addition, and a landscape n I an to be presented to Council to be completed over the upcomir.g years, and the driveway boundaries identified. Ayes 7, nays 0. (#6) #1824 ERIC & SHELLY LILJEQUIST, 2490 BIRCH LANE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:59 - 9:18 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Liljequist were present. Mabusth explained the appiicants seek a street setback variance for a detached garage to be located in the street yard of the lakeshore lot. She noted that during the inspection of the property, staff found it necessary to back out onto Baldur Park at the three way intersection, and suggested they need to remedy this situation. The City engineer has provided three options: 1. align the garage and drive with the house; 2. construct the garage so the doors face away from Birch Lane and angle the garage aligning 't with the property boundary; or 3. directly angle the garage toward Birch Lane. Mabusth indicated the applicant has requested hardcover be kept to a minimum as he wishes to complete future improvements to the house. —» .. --- L. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1824 - CONT. Liljequist reviewed Options #1 and #3 aligning the driveway directly with the drive across the street and Said this is not viable and Option #2 provides for too sharp of a tern into the property. He said with their proposal they can back out onto Birch Lane. Pfterson felt Option #2 was the most logical. Liljequist noted with their proposal they would be reducing hardcover to 20%. Mabusth questioned whether the Commission would sacrifice additional hardcover for safety concerns. Rowlette said she would be willing to allow an overage of hardcover, but not assure a future Planning Commission would feel the same way. Liljequist indicated they plan to remove the sidewalk and rocks on the property. Rowlette asked how many houses are on Birch Lane, and indicated the majority of the garages on Birch Lane are setback at similar setbacks. Mabusth stated the applicants are also attempting to save the mature tree. She added she has not received comment from the neighbors. She indicated a preference to Option #2 and said hardcover would still remain below 25%. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of Application #1824 for Eric and Shelly Liljequist, 3490 Birch Lane, approving a street setback variance for a detached garage, as presented by the applicants. Ayes 7, nays 0. (#7) #1826 ROBERT & ANN HENSON, 2166 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:18 - 9:54 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Henson and Mark from Triple D, builder, were present. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1826 - CONT. Mabusth explained the applicants propose the removal of the existing tennis court, the construction of a detached garage and the addition of a deck within the 0-75’ zone. She noted the County must approve the proposed changes with regard to the approach, and the application will not be presented to Council until such approval is received by the City. The applicants propose the removal of the shed and adjacent brick structure. She noted there is currently no direct access onto the lakesho'*e yard from the house. She pointed out she could not remember a time when the Planning Commission approved new structural hardcover in the 0- 75’ zone. She suggested a walk from the lakeshore side doorway around to the side where a deck could be constructed out of the 0- 75’ setback area. Mr. Henson said that would be too near his neighbor, and noted the drainage that runs between the two lots. He indicated they propose the garage as their current garage is 120’ away from the house, uphill. He noted the tennis court needs to be resurfaced and the fencing repaired or replaced. He pointed out for the removal of 5,000 s.f. of hardcover, all they request in return outside the limits of the code is the lakeside deck. Mrs. Henson noted their engineer is currently working on plans for the access approach. Peterson questioned whether there is other hardcover in the 0-75’ zone that could be removed. Mr. Henson noted there is approximately 33 s.f. of brick area near the lakeshore. Paul and Marcia Merlo, 2142 Shadywood Road, expressed strong support for the project. They felt the removal of the tennis court would help the quality of the lake in terms of drainage, and felt the applicants should be allowed some type of deck on the lakeside of their home. Mr. Henson pointed out the deck will only extend 6’ past the existing structure as a portion of the structure currently protrudes 4’ and the deck would be placed In this area. Peterson noted they will have a tight turn into the proposed garage. Mark, applicants’ builder, said the garage will be off set from the house with 16’ doors, which should provide enough room if garage is square with the door. i a , i te.' MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1826 - CONT. Rowlette noted the proposed garage will bring hardcover to 47.86* in the 75-250’ zone. She questioned if other improvements couid be removed. Mr. Henson stated his alternal ve is to repave the tennis court. Chair Schroeder expressed concern with the increase In the 0-75’ zone and explained their long-standing position has been not to approve anything in this zone. He said he would support the garage but not the deck. Mr. Henson felt the deck was more valuable and to him than the garage. Chair Schroeder stated they cannot base their decision on Increased value, but rather must focus their main concern on protection of the lake. Mr. Henson reiterated he is removing 5,00C s.f. of hardcover for 225 s.f. of hardcover in the 0-75’ zone. Peterson asked the size of the deck. Mr. Henson replied it is proposed at I0’x25’. Peterson asked if that could be reduced. Nolan suggested an alternative would be a stepping stone grade- le'.el patio in lieu of a portion of the bricked walk near the house. He said this would not eliminate additional hardcover, but would make it more usable, and would not increase It. Mr. Henson noted the area could only be approximately 10x10’, and he does not want a deck that small. He added the land in this area is very unstable due to the high water table and any kind of grade- level deck would not be practical. He noted it is not practical to remove a portion of the brick walkway to reduce hardcover as an overhang from the house currently covers this area, thus no reduction would be realized. It was moved by Peterson, to recommend approval for Application #1826 for Robert and Ann, Henson, 2166 Shadywood Road, for variances to construct a garage and lakeside deck, based on the condition the tennis court, side shed, and brick area near the lake be removed, approval from the County is received prior to commencing, and the deck be reduced to 8x25’. Motion failed due to a lack of a second. 4 i MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE f1826 - CONT. Nolan said he would be willing to second eliminated. the deck were Mr. Henson reiterated the Importance of the deck to him. Rowlette asked how important the existing garage Is to the appIicant. Mr. Henson stated they need the additional storage and It would not be practical to landscape out that far from the house. Merlo stated he felt it would be a travesty not to approve this application for the benefit of the lake. He felt the applicants could grade the drive so the run-off was tunneled to the lawn area. Rowlette disagreed, and stated she felt without the removal of the existing garage and concrete walls, the drainage probIem wouId only be exacerbated. Lindquist stated his concern with the deck going beyond the setbacks of the existing h^use. Nolan indicated he would consider a trade-off. Mr. Henson pointed out there is nothing left on the property with which to trade. Rowlette said she would like to see more hardcover removed, and added she is not against some kind of deck on the lakeside, but would not be forced to use the removal of the tennis court as a bargaining chip. Chair Schroeder clarified to the applicant his options. Mr. Henson asked that the application be denied. It was moved by Chair Schroeder, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend denial of Application #1826 for Robert and Ann Henson, 2166 Shadywood Road, based on the fact the encroachment into the 0-75’ zone is too excessive in consideration of the additional hardcover in the 75-250’ zone, and in consideration of the removal of the tennis court. Ayes 6. nays 1. Peterson voted nay. The applicants left at this time and returned later. ilMiiildliMiliMlita,. ' 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1826 - CONT. Mr. Hensor. questioned the brick walkway on the side of the house and the area that is calculated as hardcover. Mabusth explained an overhang is considered hardcover if it exceeds 1 1/2’, so 3’ of the appiicants’ 4 1/2’ overhang area is calculated as hardcover. If the brick were removed underneath the overhang, hardcover would be based on 3’ of overhang area. Henson said he would be willing to remove this area if that would make a difference. Rowlette said this will be added to the record and forwarded on to the CouncI I. (#8) #1827 RICHARD HENRY NELSON, 3908 CHERRY AVENUE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:54 - 10:10 P.M. The AffidavIt of Publication and Certificate of MaiIing were noted. Mr. Nelson and Don Bonnicksen, the builder, were present. Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a new roof extending beyond the existing building envelope over the residence which is located within the average lakeshore setback area and the 0-75’ zone. She clarified that the roof will extend beyond the footprint of the house over a small section of existing deck on the lake side and a new deck to the rear of the house. The applicant proposes no hardcover removals. Nelson clarified that the purpose for the project is to get a deck to the rear of the property because run-off has caused structural damage to the home. Currently the roof has three peaks and the back of the property is terraced downward to the house. He said he wants to pul I the house together architectural ly. He noted he was u»)aware that he should consider removals of existing hardcover and said he would be glad to remove the plastic under the rock landscape area. Mabusth questioned whether he would be grading away from the back of the house. Nelson clarified he intends to dig a small trench and install drainage tile to run to the drive. Smith questioned his neighbors’ response. Nelson said those he talked to are in support of the project. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 ZONING FILE #1827 - CONT. Mabusth noted the removal of the plastic under the rock landscape area would reduce hardcover by 818 s.f. or 10+%. Chair Schroeder asked if the applicant has looked at removaIs. other Nelson noted he intends to remove the walkway, but this area will be overhung by the new roof. Nolan asked about the concrete pad to the left of the garage. Nelson said he would be happy to remove tnis also. Chair Schroeder inquired the status of the patio area. Nelson said he could not remove a portion of such without destroying the entire patio. It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of Application #1827 for Richard Henry Nelson, 3908 Cherry Avenue, approving variances to replace his existing roof with another that will extend outside the existing footprint of the house and the addition of a rear side deck subject to the plastic underlain with rock, concrete walkway on the west side of the house, and the concrete pad on the southeast side of garage be removed, and conditioned upon the applicant working with staff to address the drainage concerns. Ayes G, nays 1. Rowlette voted nay because she wished to see more aggress*.e hardcover removals. (#9) #1828 CHRISTOPHER TULLY, 1355 NORTH ARM DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 10:10 - 10:15 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were notel. Mabusth explained the applicant iias applied for a conditional use permit to construct an accessory structure on his through lot. noted all lots owned by the applicant in this area have been combined. The area to the rear of the proposed structure is an undeveloped road artd probably will remain so. The structure well exceeds the required 35’ setback for a principal structure. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of Application #1828 for Christopher Tully, 1355 North Arm Dr ve, approving a conditional use permit to construct an accessory structure on a through lot. Ayes 7, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1993 (ilO) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Chair Schroeder explained Comrrission members attending Council meetings are asked to •'eport to the Council on the actions of the Planning Commission, and following, report back to the Planning Commission the action of the Council. (#11) OTHER ISSUES An orientation meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, June 9, 1993 at 7:30 a.m. for all members of the Planning Commission. (#13) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Chair Schroeder, approve the minutes of the April 19, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 2, nays 0. Rowlette, Smith, Nolan, Berg and Lindquist abstained as their did not attend the meeting. (#14) REPRESENTATIVE TO THE COUNCIL MEETING Chair Schroeder vo'unteered to attend the meeting June 14, 1993 Council meeting, ano urged all new members to attend. ADJOURNMENT Chair Schroeder adjourned the regular Planning Commission meeting at 10:20 p.m. Char Ies Schroeder, Chairperson 1 6 y .. L. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, MAY 17, 1993, 7:00 P.M. 2780 KELLEY’ PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - Charles Kelley ATTENDANCE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS\PUBI.IC INFORMATION MEETING 1. 7:00 p.m. jj'1821 Margo Wirtjes, 3085 Watenown Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing 2. 8:00 p.m. #1825 Thomas L. McCarthy, 2490 Old Beach Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applicants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 3. #1820 Hennepin County Department of Environmental Management, North Arm Access Conditional Use Peimit/Variance - Public Hearing 4. #1822 Mark Prueter, 3215 Crystal Bav Road - Variances - Public Hearing 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. #1823 Marge Rossing, 130 Cygnet Place - Variance - Public Hearing #1824 Eric and Shelly Liljequist, 3490 Birch I ane - Variances - Public Hearing #1826 Robert and Ann Henson, 2166 Shadywood Road - Variances - Public Hearing #1827 Richard Henry Nelson, 3908 Cherry Avenue - Variances - Public Hearing #1828 Christopher Tully, 1355 North Arm Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Plannmg Commission Comments 10. Report by Plarjiing Commission Representative to Council Meeting of May 10, 1993 11. Other issues for discussion. 4 JdM Additional Items 13. Planning Commission approval of minutes of the April 19, 1993 meeting. 14. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the June 14, 1993 meeting of the Council. Adjournment HX.\U U •':!I-H LT Df' = Fb-:- .1 ;i! •« :i: .ll .;i f i i / TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator I, FROM:Jeanne A. Mabustli, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:May 10, 1993 SUBJECT: Steve and Mango Wirtjes, 3085 Watertown Road Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing The application involves a 2-lot subdivision within a rural residential zoning district, RR- IB, requiring 2 acres in area and a 200 ’ lot width. Applicants had originally filed a subdivision application in March of 1990 that was withdrawn when applicants pursued construction of new residence as shown on proposed Lot 1, review Exhibit J. The following sections of the subdivision and zoning codes are pertinent for the current review: 1. Definition Section 11.03, 66 (C) - Class III Subdivision 2. Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) A.Lot area Required = 2 acres of dry buildable Lot 1 proposed = 2.36 dry Lot 2 proposed = 2.52 dry B.Lot width Required at 50’ front/street setback Lot 1 = 300’ + Lot 2 = 172 ’ Variance = 28’ or 14% = 200’ 3.Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) - Setback for accessory structure on proposed Lot 1 Required setback = 15’ Proposed 5’ Variance = 10 ’ or 75% variance Total structure area = 997.5 s.f. 4.Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F) Required setback for accessory structures less than 750 s.f. in area = 10 ’ 5. Section 10.02 - Definition 34 - Lot area Drainage way that has been created along west lot line must be designated at a minimum 20 ’ width and excluded from total of dry buildable lot area Zoning File #1821 May 10, 1993 Page 2 6.Section 11.08 - Definition 24 - Lot area - minimum. All lots must contain a minimum of 2 acres of dry contiguous buildable land e.xclusive of weilands, public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian casements, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any surface water or areas at or below the flood plain elevation for a specific property ’. In cases where rural lots are encn-ached by drainage easements, areas of drainage ways are excluded from dry buildable but areas on either side of drainage way are considered inclusive within contiguous dry buildable inventory. Per the definition, lands divided by wetlands, floodplains or lake areas cannot be credited. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Plan of Drainage Improvements Along West Lot Line E - Topographic Map of Area F - Map of Surrounding Area G - Original Plat for 1990 Review H - Engineer ’s Report I - Septic Report J - Current Preliminary Plan Description of Current Application Review Exhibits G and J, the original application proposed - a straight line division line further south. The current proposal shows the proposed division line to the center line of the existing drainage way that drains from east to west through the property . The drainage way defines the actual physical barriers to both properties. Both rural lots maintain the required 2 acres of dry contiguous land. The division line along the drainage way creates a need for a lot width variance of 28’ at the 50’ front setback line for proposed Lot 2. The City has approved lot width variances with the creation of new lots when it can be found that the lots could be configured to meet the lor width requirement. The actual boundaries of the properties are now defined by a physical barrier of the drainage way and would reflect the actual usage of each lot. Access to the property is via a shaied private driveway outlot shown at a 30’ width along the east side of the property'. Current driv<»way is located outside of the outlot and it is recommended that the shared drive be reinsuilled within the driveway outlot. The City will ask for a dedication of the 33’ of right-of-way of Watertown Road. Note property line runs to the center of the roadway. Zoning File #1821 Mav 10, 1993 Page 3 The original application was withdrawn when applicants pursued the building permit for the new construction and you should be aware that once a subdivision has been commenced, building permits cannot be issued for any new construction until the subdivision has been approved. The former residence on the property (Lot 1) has been demolished. Access As already noted, the access shall be shared via the private driveway cutlot. Note accessory structure is only 5 ’ from lot line Private driveway outlot can be reduced to 25 in width. The City has no required standards for driveway outlot widths. Applicants have advised that 14 ’ X 26.4 ’ addition to the bam can easily be removed and is in a serious state of disrepair. Tliis would reduce the accessory strucnire to 627.9 s.f. requiring only a 10’ setback. By reducing outlot width to 25 ’, structure will meet required 10’ setback. Owners to immediate east had voiced concern that a driveway could be placed so close to a property line. The City has no standards for setbacks for private driveways to adjacent lot lines. In order to provide adequate distance from adjacent property, outlot may remain at a 30 width along the portion that abuts the residence structure to the east and then reduced to a 25 width as it approaches the accessory structure. Please review Exhibit H, the Engineer has recommended that the size of the culvert to be placed under the drive that extends southward be designed by an engineer in order to assure that upstream storage is not increased. Access and utility easements will be taken at a 10’ width along all perimeter property lines. Drainage Issues Review Exhibits D and E, drainage was the major concern during the earlier 1990 review. Specifically, the area along the northwest lot line where drainage originally traveled northward collecting within the northwest comer of property before it drained through 12" culvert. Concern was raised because of the location of the septic site areas proposed for Lot 1 and the need to keep the flooding elevation below the 974.5. Upon applicafion for the new residence, the applicants were required to install a new septic system. If the principal drainfield site was to be used, the drainage improvements had to be completed. Drainage improvements consisted of the plugging of the 12" culvert, the installation of an underground tUe and drainage swale redirecting drainage to tributar>< to the south along the proposed shared lot line. The drainage way must be maintained it the proposed septic areas are to remain contorming. It will be necessary to take a 20’ drainage easement over the drainage way along the west lot line. k Zoning File #1821 May 10. 1993 Page 4 Septic Please review ExhibU I. U.e o"-" “ «re original 1990 subdivision review clearly note jjrainfield to well. Unfortunatel>. both .0 meet 75 ’ required -parauon setback Sh^r„t failed to heed .he CUys applicants and well inspenor ^7 Jf „eet the State's 50' separation settack separation requirements. Tte 7 “ ^ j fl,e alternate septic drainfield has been from the principal septic system. Resiew txn m , separation setback negated as\ is located 40’ that if the alternate site is to requirement. The fumre owner of Lot 1 nmsi p ^ installed meeting the 75 be^tilized at some future date that a w confirmation that Lot 2 will Sparaiion setback. The on-s.te sepne ''' to prior to any driveway support a development of Lot 2 that the on-s.te septtc “X:Sa“ e<> before land alterations take place. Staff Recommendation nrooerty located at 3085 Watertown Road finding ttot an substandard lot widtn ^plopo!^”L^rr t 1 *hardships; Lots can be platted so that required lot width can be met. B Shared lot line has been defined along the meandering drainage way that intersects property from east to west. Lot lines refiect functional usage area for each lot. Approval of the 2-lot subdivision is based on the following conditions: 1 <11 VJl til'- ^ ---------------- A • f ^ ^ r\^r\i cirtii^rTlrC 4^ • a new wtii -— approval. ___V ■■ -tr ,r Zoning File mil May 10, 1993 Page 5 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Private driveway outlet can be reduced in width to 35’ as it approaches accessory structure on Lot 1. Private driveway shall be reinstalled within driveway outlet and special care should be given to minimize impact upon existing development to east. 10’ wide drainage and utility easement shall be required along all perimeter property lines except for the west lot line where drainage way must be shown as a 20’ wide drainage easement. As drainage easement extends south and east through Lot 1, the 10’ width drainage and utility easement shall continue along the perimeter of the west lot line. Upon Council approval of preliminary plat, the plat shall be referred to the City Assessor for the determination of the fair market value of the property so that a park dedication fee can be determined at 8% of the fair market value. Dedication of 33’ cf right-of-way for Watertown Road. Prior to any land alterations for development of proposed Lot 2, applicants shall be responsible for staking principal and alternate septic test sites. Applicants’ engineer shall provide the necessary hydraulic information to support sizing of culvert. A' VS>.-' • - # CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APP PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address TIOl 1rlrv re i. 4 f t C'MVIIU* rzeTre I xitmtui. C’l t ^ C'U •.-----l^ZO^dOOOOJL w*w‘V»» V'C'WV A ^ r \f A c f \j7r i' Tf rcij 77A \fA 1?U»« wfw‘V'*V •rvTf«u'fA * *»f* y *'•*? T*y - IWI I A *•rrw I V'w*u*V w-V' v' a Property Identification Number (P. I >D> ) ilP V ^ ^^/T^*TPT- ) Please check one - Property y abstract or _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application* « 1 f» rw* O V' • V vr./? 04/21 APPLICANT Name T/^C a c* trr> LJ />tT^c Phone (home) Phone (work) Address: LiAni^TOc^ (^40 City: Ci^r'-iuA Zip: 3 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Address: City: (attach list if more than one) Phone (work) 7 _ _ _ _Zip:_£l2^ EXISTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels / Development Size S'. I c,-xn. S^32^ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acr^s Totalf all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ __ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Rjilding Sites Number cf Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residt'.ncial Other (specify) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION Completed Application Form 2, Preliminary Plat information on Certificate^ of Survey. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a^ separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __Date 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (par)c fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official’s Signature_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II S III)$200.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I s II Subdivision) 300.00 300.00-)^^ Preliminary Review (Class III s all non-residential)325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature * ^ ^Date 7 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUtI DATE 10/10/09DATCII 003 PROP ADDR DH4ER riAME TAXPAYER NAMC/ADOR PROP AOOR OiamR NAftE TAXPAYER tJAME/ADUR PROP ADDR OMIIER IIAriE TAXPAYER tJAttE/ADOR PROP ADDR OltMER rtAtlE TAXPAYER NA21E/A00R PROP ADDR OMNEP NAME TAXPAYER HAltE/ADDR PROP ADDR OtfftER NAftE TAXPAYER NAJtE/ADDR IIEN IEPIN CCXiimr PROPERTY IMFORIIATIOU SYSTEM PROPERTY OHfttRS LIST30 O^f-117-23 21 0001 02905 I^TERTOICf RD DOIIALO T TROJJDRIDGE ET AL DONALD A MARGARET TROMDRIDGE ZPtSS G UAlERTOItfl RD L0::G LAKE M:I 55356 38 0^»-117-23 22 0010 00105 CYGTIET PL G J EMALT ETAL GREGORY J niALT 105 CYCffET PLACE LONG LAKE m 55356 30 0^1-117-23 22 0016 00060 CYGHE1 PL .liARLr u UU hl AWKXl^MMKLr u uuilLAF . m ^ ALAI I ^Lurnn 60 CYGflET PLACE LONG LAKE lUI 55356 30 0<'f-117-23 22 0021 00190 CYGNET PL MARflUETTE DANK OF MPLS N A ROMALD A A ROCIfl A llOHRttAN 190 CYCttET PLACE LOMG LAKE m 55356 30 0^*-117-23 22 002^ 00020 CYGNET PL H J A ft M PAffUGKA HAROLD J/MARGARET t1 PAffUSKA 20 CYGMET PL LOtfG LAKE MN 55356 30 0'»-117-23 2^ 0006 BARBARA K COFFIN BARBARA K COFFIN 3025 MATERTOfn^ RD LOrJG LAKE fUf 55356 I > f ^ 38 0<i-117-23 22 0008 00065 CYGMET PL DIANE L KOEPKE DIANE L KOEPKE 65 CYGNtT PLACE LOf4G LAKE Lffl 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0011 00135 CYGNET PL tt g DEttCERD SIC S DECKgRO MOMTC e PgeKCRO^/,^n^M / 135 CYGNET PL LONG LAKE ft4 55356 30 04-117-23 22 0017 00000 CYGNET PL P « A VITKO PAUL A A AMI L VITKO 00 CYGNET PLACE L0f4G LAKE f34 55356 30 04-117-23 22 0022 00100 CYGt>l£T PL VIL OF ORONO CITY OF OROfK) sees 30 04-1X7-23 22 0027 03005 HATERTOJUJ RD S P HIRTJES A M M NIRTJES STEVEN P A MARGO M NIRTJESvmmmmmmA NATERTONN RO LOMG LAKE Mff 55356 30 33-110-23 32 0001 03140 MATERTOf'tff RD DORSET OEVELOPflENT IffC DORSET DEVELOPMENT. ItfC 3125 FOX ST L^^fG LAKE ftN 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 538 04-117-23 22 0009 00085 CYGNET PL G J F.HALT ETAL GREGGP.'' J EIIALT 105 CYGMET PLACE LONG LAKE M4 55356 38 0‘i-117-23 22 0012 00145 CYGf4ET PL A E BLOEMENOAAL ETAL ARTHUR E BLOEMENOAAL m 1 iu?r L0T4G LAKE ItN 55356 LOEMENOAAL ^ ItN 55356 #^ 38 04-117-23 22 0020 00160 CYGI4ET PL JAMEO tt CAMPION }■ JAMCO M CAMPION 160 CYGNET PLACE L0I4G LAKE MI4 55356 I- ^ 38 04-117-23 22 0023 00130 CYGNET PL PATRICIA A HARDEN MARGARET 0 ROSSING 130 CYG?4ET PL L0t4G LAKE MN 55356 % 38 04-117-23 22 0028 03045 HATERT0Hr4 RD BRUCE C A KATHRYN BRUCE C a KATHRYN 3045 MArERT0NI4 RD ORONO U4 55356 S S HALL HALL 38 33-110-23 33 0001 03020 HATERTOMN RO R A STUiBS ETAL R A STU;:c3 3020 HA FRTOWN RD L0I4G LAI.E MI4 55356 •H • • > I' -i 4 RUN DATE 10/10/09 *0* BATCH 003 HEMIEPIH COUNTY PROPERTY INTORIWriON SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»««RS LIST REPORT NO. PI<i35401 PAGE 6PROP ADOR OtaiER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 33-110-23 34 000400055 HEAR LA NHEAR ENrERPP.ISEG PARTNERSHIPHEAR EINERPRISES PARTNERSHIPC/0 HILLIAM W HEAR P 0 D0:< 245 LOtlO LAKE tUl 55356 -M.4 I • r::- ■ TOTAL BATCH 003 00019 4^ : I» I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE representation' of information AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OF THE HEtfllEPIN COUNTY DEPARTtlENT^OF PROPERJ^^AXATION, TO JHIT BEST OF flY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF OAT M9i i j ■ ■__ IM 3 I Jj i I V 1 i/ J Bonestroo gpfl Rosene Anderllk& |\J| Associates Engineers & Architect* Oro 6 fcr%cj:-0Q, f« fcSfT X' »c*ere •!• C P£ 1 Scrvie i C t- I C jck pi c \ey:i f f »CCM C. SC»urxr* PS Si.un V c M •V" if C j'-Sw re-! IlW.T A PI ffctfl St t »£ vv PI S 0 Lcusti ACMfT C ^L1S#< A 1^ ->fy A I9UCOA Pf Mi’t A ^iriar. P£ Uc*‘^e< r I^Tinn. P» ^<5 < Pe j P£ # A-rr!^.* A A Oe-#o r ff T-C-^l £ A a ;;^ PB ’■irnt Vj/rrer Pf ? flu ®£. ••» >3 J Py*** A;-*! V «-; A C ? Trc-rii W. P£ Mcraft C Pt .a-ei f Vi PB .'r^ 3 Ar-aicT' ?f <Cerrem P Argf»i3n, p» Va.-ii i frt-i P£ Vi •. A. Sei •£ 3i.> a- Vor^n. 9£ Car.^ j tc;fr?cn Pf Atan »<n ef. J Cai,.T'*. Mi l D '^i I P£ V fi t PS I ;V. •£ <a*n t ’JV fre^.. #f Ca> O •C'fttj'a Pf ^ ’^a ^2iisr Keen 4 Vasa Pi OCi9*J! J lenr-l Pf S^jAf* c. GwJU*Vi.l pf C*r -oC^vf »£ Crarei a . £»ici*cn LfC M Piwruy M c-ior Jj'^i ? t^9#Aa/ef May 7, 1993 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Wirtjes Lot Division Pile No. 139~1821 Osar Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed property division for Steve Wirtjes in the Northwest Quarter of section 4, located on the south side of Watertown Road. The division is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 10 feet wide along the right-of-way for Watertown Road, 5 feet wide along the easterly and westerly property lines for each lot, and 5 feet wide along the south line of Lot 2. The existing driveway should be relocated within outlet A, as it is proposed to function as a common access for both lots. The extension oC the driveway to serve Lot 2 will require a culvert crossing at the •xiPting drainage ditch. The size of the culvert should be designed by an engineer based on the tributary area, so that the upstream storage is not increased. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERT IK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. - I 7 To: From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager May 11. 1993 Subdivision #1321, Steven Wirtjes - Septic Review Soil testing and system design was submined for this two-lot subdivision in 1989. Lot 1 contains a home which is connected to a conforming septic system with an alternate site available for a 5-bedroom home. Lot 2 has approved soil testing and system design for a 4- bedroom home. The site evaluator, Steven Schirmers, will be reviewing the site to verify that the sites are suitable for a 5-bedroom home. Although Lot 1 has suitable existing anu alternate drainfield sites, the poor placement of the well has resulted in sites which do not meet the City’s required 75 ’ well setback. The existing drainfield site is 50 ’ from the well with the alternate site encroaching within 35 ’ of the well. As the State of Minnesota requires that a minimum 50 ’ setback be maintained from the well to a drainfield, staff will allow well in its current location. However, at the time the alternate drainfield site is required for use, the well must be abandoned and located at least 75 ’ from the septic system. Staff will recommend approval of the septic system siting as proposed, provided the above condition is met. Also, both primary and alternate drainfield sites on Lot 2 must be fenced prior to construction. lililii rtiftifli To:Mayor Callahan & Orono Councilmembers Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Mav 11. 1993 #1825 Thomas L. McCarthy. 2490 Old Beach Road - Preliminary Subdivision Class III - Conditional Use - Public Hearing The applicant proposes a two-lot division of the 2+ acre parcel. Mr. McCarthy provides two alternative plans for development, Alternates A and B. Applicant s preterence is Alternate A. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: 1. Section 11.03, Definition 66. Class III Subdivision. 2.Section 11.03, Definition 24. Lot Area Minimum. In urban areas served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain contiguous dry buildable land equal to the minimum areas as prescribed in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code or half acre, whichever is less, (exclusive of public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the ordmary high water mark of any wetland or lake) and have legal access to the building site without encroachment of a wetland or flood plain area. Alternate A, preferred by applicant, requires access easements through lx)t 2 in favor of Lot 1. Area of access easement would have to be excluded from dry buildable area of Lot 2. There is clearly not enough area within Lot 2 to provide an easement without also having the City approve area variances. The City does not grant area variances with the creation of new lots. 3.Section 10.02, Definition 43 (B). Lot Width. For lots which abut a lake or tributary at the shoreline measured in a straight line between the points at which the side lot lines intersect the ordinary high water level (929.4) and at the required sirucnire setback from the OHWL measured in a straight line between the points of intersection of the side lot lines with the structural setback line. For Lake Minnetonka, a General Development Lake, the setback is 75 . Alternatives A and B show Lot 1 as meeting the required lot width standards. Note there is only one lakeshore lot proposed with the two-lot subdivision. Lot 2 will be non-riparian to Lake Minnetonka. As lot width is measured at the lakeshore and at die 75 ’ setback line. Lot 1 may be platted as a flag lot with a 20 wide evrridor without requiring a lot width variance. (Lot width is measured at the 35 ’ street setback for the non-lakeshore lot.) I 4.Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B). Lot Standards for LR-IB Lakesliorc Residential Zt ning District require that each lot meet 140’ width requirement as follows: Lot 2 at 35’ street setback measures 200 + ’. Lot 1 measured in a straight line at shoreline and at the 75’ setback measures 180+’ Lot area: Required = 1 acre Alternate A : Lot 1 at 1.005 acres Lot 2 Proposed = 40,560 s.f. or ,93 acres (3,000 s.f. of driveway easement excluded from proposed lot area Area Variance = 3,000 s.f. or .07% Alternate B: Lot 1 = 1.006 acres Lot 2 = 1 .(X)4 acres 5. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2. Hardcover. Alternate .A 0-75’ setback area = 0 75-250’ setback area = 8,360 s.f. or 28.05% Proposed Lot 2 75-250’ setback area = 595 s.f. or 12.86% 250-500’ setback area = 1,020 s.f. or 4.9% Hardcover has not been provided for Alternate B proposal but clearly proposed Lot 1 would have an excess of hardcover over the allowed 25%. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Sewer As-Built Engineer ’s Report Hardcover Fact Sheets Alternate A Alternate B Review of Subdivision Application The Shore Hills plat was completed in 1941 prior to City-wide zoning or lot standards. The majority of lots within the Shore Hills plat meet or exceed the current LR-IB zoning standards. Lot 4, the subject property, consists of a little over two acres. Alternate A would *4 Zoning File #1825 May \2, 1992 Page 3 not meet the required area standards of the LR-IB zoning district. Alternate B would meet all required LR-IB zoning standards. Hardcover excesses exist within proposed Lot 1 with either Alternate A or B. Unfortunately, hardcover facts have been provided without a plan of all existing hardcover improvements. Staff will ask that the hardcover site plan be submitted by your review at the May 17th meeting. At the time of a subdivision, the City reviews for conformance with all pertinent ordinances. Applicant has an excess of hardcover and has presented no hardships. On your site inspection, note the excessive parking and apron area adjacent to the garage. Some 910 s.f. of existing improvements must be removed if Lot 1 is to meet the hardcover limitation of 25%. Staff should also note that Lot 1 as proposed in Alternate B would have an excess of hardcover within the 250-500 setback area. It would be easier to develop hardships for the access drive within the narrow corridor of the lot located within the 250-500’ setback area. Alternate B is the acceptable alternative for subdivision as Alternate A involves an excessive lot area variance. Access The City Engineer has asked that a shared access be required rather than a separate access for Lot 2 at Shore Hills Road. Shore Hills Road is a private road. Lot 2 does have adequate width adjacent to Shore Hills Road (200-1-’). If a shared access is required by City, the City must grant an area variance for proposed Lot 1 with Alternate B because area of easement in favor of Lot 2 would be excluded from Lot 1 s area. The request for a shared access is consistent with City’s policy to eliminate additional curb cuts on roadways. The shared access may be limited to tlie existing curb cut area at ^hore Hills Road and minimize impact on lot area of Lot 1. Sewer/Water Review Exhibit D. Sewer is located within lakeshore yard. This is the only sewer line that can function for this property. It will be necessary to install the access line along the west side yard of Lot 1. Appropriate easement would have to be developed over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2. Note utility easements are not excluded from areas of lots. Water shall be provided from the service on Shore Hills Road to the immediate east. Future developer of Lot 2 shall be responsible for payment of a sewer unit $10,954.20 and water unit at $1,877.00 based on current fee schedule upon application for a building permit. Lot Configuration Although all accessor)' improvements have not been shown on preliminary survey, the majority of accessory improvements e.xclusive of the drive are located within the lakeshore yard. The accessory shed is located at the shared lot line in Alternate B and if approved must be removed prior to final plat approval as it does not meet the required 10 setback from the newly proposed lot line. Zoning File #1825 May 11. 1993 Page 4 Issues for Review 1.Lacking a hardship statement for hardcover excess of 3 + %, would members recommend a hardcover variance under any circumstances? At your site inspection, please note the drivewav improvement and lakeshore yard improvements on proposed Lot 1. 2.What alternative form of development would you recommend for approval? Note Alternate B may result in a slight area variance if shared access is required. It can be minimized if access to Lot 2 via easement is limited to existing curb cut at Shore Hills Road. Alternate A involves a reduction of some 3,000 s.f. in area for a 20 ’ x 150 ’ drive that would encroach Lot 2. Shared access would also be required. Recommendation To recommend approval of the two-lot Class III subdivision application of Thomas L. McCarthy finding that all LR-IB lot standards and shoreland development standards have been satisfied and that there is adequate sewer and water to serve a new lot based on the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall create an access and utility easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2 to provide sewer service from existing serv ice-Y in lakeshore yard. Adequate care must be taken during the construction of the service line as sewer Une is located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Applicant to provide 10 ’ wide drainage and utility easements along all perimeter property lines and 5’ along the shared lot line. 3.Upon application for a building permit, future owner of Lot 2 shall make payment for a sewer unit and water unit charge based on the current lee schedule. 4.Determination as to the recommendation for a shared access. If a shared access is required, there may be a need to grant an area variance for Lot 1. If driveway approach is restricted to the first 20 ’ within corridor, area of driveway easement could be reduced to no more than 200 s.f. It may not have an impact on lot area. 5.Members recommendation concerning excess of hardcover within the 75-250 setback area within proposed Lot 1. Are there hardcover improvements esjential to the use of the property, i.e.* backout area for driveway apron, deck adjacent to patio doors from indoor pool addition, access stairs from upper elevation doors in lakeshore yard, etc.? 1 1I Jin CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ^ p 1 • • • ^ .*v PROPERTY LOCATION • . • i i1 rj • < . » mTrn. * •• - / Site Address O ^C? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Property Identification Nunber (P.I.D.) ~ 1/ /~~ ^3_ Please check one ~ Property _ _ abstract or • -V. torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Phone (home)_ _ Name 'TT/OmS /tl(’rWICT//-K_______Phone (work) Address . UJctsJilh ‘f A<^-^City; F*)! HA Zloi ^S93 9 OWNER (if different than applicant) Neune _ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:Zip: (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USB Number of Tax Parcels / r' f Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all Present Use (check)/acn^Residential; no. Other (specify)_ ilTi OF DRCHO FmfiCE OFFICEnmyooo parcels rjzrcTC/T^ruM!i{ yn/;^ iSui^u^i I tnnivx I Uif ^v7»u *Vi f AFii rj-}1 T1 of unitS^ ^ -,J v-r/ Ck. Present Zoning District ^ PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Ntjjnber of Bt.ilding Sites;/Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density; Minimum Lot Size: Units per / Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use; (check)v/Residential Other (specify) must obtain MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey• 3. Certified Fropeity Owners List of owners within 350' vycu this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-6C3 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^ 1 . ^ 4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a^ separate list or any other persons you wish notified ot this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _Date 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _— Date- - - - -- - FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $200.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class I s II Subdivision)300.00 Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential)325.00 + 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into thfe Cxty offices 25/ua/s before Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Corfmission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I RUN DATE 04/E0/9S? BATCH 007 (•HEttCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LISTV )•it • •PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR > 50 21-117-25 21 0004 02445 NAPLERIOGE LA C H SHOOT III A C A SHOOT CHARLES P CECILIA SHOOT III 2445 HAPLE RIDGE LA EXCELSIOR HN 55551 PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER KAHE/ADDR 50 21-117-25 22 0004 02400 OLD BEACH RO H H A K A HOOARES HICHAEL H A KATHY A HODARES 2400 OLD BEACH RD NAYZATA m 55591 i i PROP ADOR OMCR NAHE TAXPAYER 1 ; C NAME/ADtm SB 21-117-75 22 0007 02510 OLD BEACH RO KEITH 6 OLSON ETAL KEITH G OLSON 2510 OLD BEACH ROAD NAYZATA m 55591 * > 1 • PROP ADDR OltlER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 50 21-117-25 22 0010 02540 OLD BEACH RD JAHES R KREY JAHES R KREY 2540 OLD BEACH RO NAYZATA HN 55591 *-•1 I* ' > J. • ‘ • ^ : »•* ^ •. 1.•• V .i<V; • i\ PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR U K • ■ A; V T HAPLE ,:'r- '1* .-iv, « ' • ti / • .• • , ^ fl •.■ -r/v-. ^ »• : • 50 21-117-25 22 0019 02555 OLD BEACH RD R C RICHHOOD CO INC R C RICHHOOD CO INC 15760 REINER DR BB tOVE HN 55511 : . • I I•f ^ .i r » 56 21-117-25 21 000502405 HAPLERIDGE LA ERIC H PAULSON ERIC H PAULSON 2405 HAPLE RIDGE LA EXCELSIOR HN 55551 50 21-117-25 22 0005 02490 OLD BEACH RD HINVESCO CORPORATION HINVESCO CORPORATION 9572 CREEKNOOD DR EDEN PRAIRIE HN 55544 50 21-117-25 22 0006 C2550 OLD BEACH RO LAUREL PARTRIOGE-STAUBLY LA«JREL PARTRIOGE-STAUBLY 25:0 OLD BEACH RD NAYZATA m 55591 • I 50 2.1-117-25 22 0017 02455 OLD BEACH RD R C RICHHOOD COHPANY INC R C RICHHOOD COHPANY INC 15760 RllHER DR tB HAPLE GROVE HN 55549 a- • 41 • . ‘ * A * .> ^ 58 21-117-25 22 0020 02585 OLD BEACH RO E H BLANCH tO LTD PTNSHP E N BLANCH CO LTD PTNSHP 5500 H BOTH ST HPLS HN 559.U A <. ■■'k > . * 9 A ^ ■ * t - r • » REPORT NO. P1455401 PAGE 1738 21-117-25 22 000502990 OLD BEACH RD EARL A SHEEN EARL A SFCEN 2990 OLO BEACH RO NAYZATA m 55591 i . t II •• 56 21-117-25 22 0004 02494 OLO BEACH RO 0 A SAKLAO ASH SAKLAD DANIEL A SAKLAD 2494 OLD BEACH RD ORONO HN 55591 «• • s 56 21-117-25 22 0009 02540 OLD BEACH RD D H SCHNEIDER A H H LEAF D H SCHNEIDER A H H LEAF 2540 OLD BEACH RO NAYZATA HN 55591 pLTSi' • r 5B 21-117-21 22 OOIB 02505 OLD BEACH RD R C RICHHOOD COHPANY INC R C RICHHOOD COHPANY INC 157BO REINER OR «B HAPLE GROVE HN 55369 .,10 ©1 TOTAL BATCH 007 00014 I ♦ ' • i In-: \;i 9 • • / ' *. '%0 , • • • • . > ■ » ■■■•'■ .:i''V- •. ■ ■ , t \ ' •'? •m 8 . * 1 ..* • i * ' • ' • o', ; « 0 •‘i*•[0- ■1;: I •' \I • • RUN DATE M/20/9S . » f ‘.•BATCH 'OOT'.. • •.y :* n ''■ ''•/■.■■■' ■' ‘Jfl - •■•7 <r\i •« ,• * ■ • -.T t ' *HEMCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OtIERS LIST REPORT NO, PI455401 PAGE la i- I *. > . • .■"'4 )f:> jr’fv ‘ V j, , > ■ s/> //V'i" w .*' - •» .‘L • - • i *• • v- •’ •. i* 1 % I r / *•9 rt rj7» tcv 3W '•r U^'.'.FT 'fr^ i L.C6) Li I I L^vM)/•* t!» -> •_ > • j -’w •'. 4. I * • •< M •* • •••••• • • • • •*..• ••• ••• /(18) PM ’■■!Old o. VO.OJ J I ft V lOf • (?0 IIAir 155 (") K If > - (] 3) (1?) • 1 ^ 9» ^ ^ S _. _J» .^(w) ^ -iB '5 - . - ^ (30) •» 07) f ^l^ « ‘ ‘?i’|" -■/ F». ■‘f „ .^j A JoIff. 0 ^ «Y ^ f" / • —is—X (Uri^ _ ( y IQT .*uD 5UeO 344 L (1) / / -'J »sy 'V-, 7 •<.... i .* ^ (54) . (26) y "7 3 to » % <&' Ml 4^ 2 *^b 'S S8 e* 'A*' ^ j ......^-?7.. ..‘•' Ji w (51) ' "'6 »\ (50)X'‘’'^ (53) (55) V /. i ^ J Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk& Associates Engineers Et Architects CT!C C fsnfurXk A/ •£ • C /•-:?"« »r fi Ctr-^M Cac« ^r-ii S »r C Sc--^:n *f SwU- V CP a •s^*C' Cc“i-rj^j >*CVva’3 A Sjrfe-r «>r ^ Gi-tf;-' p : ? ^•-r f »i A ^2j:c'. P! Grfv'fi 0 LCi«f!i •« C A A -f "y »| Vj*t A »2 VcAiA T < ff s A-rrii- A A Got# j c •£ T.-c-'^iJ E rf k*^if. Vi't'*ff •£ V^-ie» ^ Pf •• 5; •>-? »r A^*:i *.* ?-r-; ax* X **'*ic'\ *£ Vc“ie C Lv-":a Ff .j'^ei I •« .f*7 o *tT/!C- *C Vi'K n ?i A Va Pf Car, vV Vv f- Pi -i“f frjc-'- •£ ^ i'' tct kA-<r ®» A."* ; Ca\w-’ »£ Vl « S * f£ V ei ft .»*fM Pe i : G'j*^ rt Ac Ot-» w a. f-rr>. ;»£ C*7 a </•$».♦ ar p£ * S<ra «ci»' *r Kar* I V4CU AE rc^;it j If'-a: »• 0 Cwiri*ti?«. AC. Cr: ‘»o *K C^j f! A C i4w:'' Lfa M Pi^tuy hirtn M QlSn May 7, 1993 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: McCarthy Lot Division File No. 139-1825 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the 4, Shore Hills subdlv located on the north side of shore Hills Road and west of Old Beach proposed property division for Tom McCarthy of Lot ision in the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Read* The division is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 10 feet wide along the right-of-way for Shore Hills Road and 5 feet wide along all other property lines for each lot. We recommend that the existing driveway be located within a 30 foot vide outlet, to serve the purpose of a oommon access for both lots. Sewer service to Lot 1 is provided by a service wye located to the north of the existing house, near Lafayette Bay, The location of the existing sewer line is shown on Record Plan A65. Sewer service to Lot service along the westerly line of Lot 1. This alignment would require a 10 foot vide drainage and utility easement along the westerly line of Lot 1. There is also an existing sewer line located under Shore Hills Drive, as shown on Record Flan A66. sewer service to Lot 2 from this line may be possible, but it would require the excavation and replacement of the roadway and driveway in the area. The elevation of this sewer may prohibit its use to service Lot 2. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. }i^SuXY\/L.m Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. t k' > li f M6C.AC.niy - •KAre.ce 6 1 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ?.CNE: (CIRCLE cne) 75-250' 250-500' E.“<isting Hardcover in Zone 500-1000' A. HOUSE X s S.F, LENGTH width • X a •S.F. X S.F. •• X S.Fi X • • S.Fi 3. Garage X S.F, c. D riveway X 3 S.F. X / .• S • S.F, • D. Sidewalk .X « S.F. X a S.F,« X •• • S.F.E. Patio / D eck X S.F. * F.Landscape X • , S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN • BY ,, X a S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING • • X S.F. X • ••• •• •S.F. G. Other X S.F. • • Total Hardcover#IN Z6n £O S.F. » • Total Property A rea in Zone /< ooa 9.P. a __jE___•T B 1 /4^ ooo X 100 - f'26 fj II 1 hfciraAiii ^ / /^ic.CAe.rn^ 'pAAcet, 2. /cTf^^-rey, HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Total Hardcover in Z6n& Total Property Area in Zone s-?s n ] y<rzs. s?s S.F. il££:l_S.F. U .A X 100 4-2C-9J SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE Existing Hardcover in one) 0- ZONE •75' (^-250^ 250-500' 500-1000' A. House X = S . P . LENGTH width • X = ’ S.F. _ _ X =* .S.F. •• X = 5^ . P . X • • - 55. F . B. Garage X = <5 . F . c. Driveway X = ^9s S.F. X • / •* “ S.F. D. Sidewalk X _» S.F. X = * 55.F. X /• ? = S.F.E. Patio/ Deck X = • S.F. . F.Landscape X = ■ S.F. areas UNDERLAIN BY X » S.F. PLASTIC SHEET ING X • * ' S.F. _ X •' V • • = . ' S.F.• G. Other X = S.F. %-'-F •■-^^-,>.■1 ...-^ —I-____• j.___________1______■ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-25J' Existing H ardcover in Zone tr^cjLl 2^ 250-500'J 500-1000 A •H ouse LENGTH 3. G arage c. Driveway 0. Sidewalk • E'Di E. H atio / ECK F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other X X X X X WIDTH Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone /?2o t •• if • • S.F. _ S.F. • • _ S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. S.F. . S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. i & I /9Zi> 4 m X 100 - .V 1. f- . I \ » r -T' ! —»vA h ALTERNATE A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TOM McCarthy OF LOT 4. SHORE HILLS HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA Q K *■ 7# i'v :i legal description of premises: Lot 4. Shore Hills. This survey Intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house and shed thereon. It does not purport to show any other Improvements or encroachments t ♦ w\». e* • V. virit. ■*. COFFIN & GRONUFlir.. iNr / MyiHivry l^iml ^0nryi<r\, Si/< 482 Tanwr.Ki Awmu- • Li>ng Ijkr MN SS1S#, bl2 473 -INI I hrii In ■ I ililt tli tMlu« •<.!« I'tf pjfi'd In nn »*f iii'.k t • . ll< ii I im 4 tlul\ I) i;r*lrii->l L It a I t<4;ii<vri 4rHl I jn<l' irti tiv unUt t IIht b%*% i4 iIm S| itr i4 VUik s I hittM- NuiiiUi f f '’"i 1 % l.i •\ A rv /f o ;)i^^ h' r i ‘ I MAY A n *?CC7 May 11, 1993 Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City cf Orono P.0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Jeanne, I am writing to you in reference to a notice I received concerning the proposed two lot subdivision of 2490 Old Beach Road. We recently purchased 2480 Old Beach Road in Orono. We purchased the property because of the privacy and ’’uncrowded" feel the neighborhood has. If the land owned by Thomas McCarthy is subdivided, it is our feeling this subdivision would not be aesthetically desireable for Old Beach Road. Currently, there are 2 and 3 acre lots accross the street from us, we own 2 acres, as do our neighbors. The property Mr. McCarthy owns is sloped, so that if a home was built on the lot, it would be "sitting on top f us." The subdivision would most certainly have a negative effect on our property value. We strongly urge the City of Orono not to grant approval for the subdivision. We have a beautiful neighborhood! We would hate to see the "patchwork" effect so many neighborhoods suffer from in nearby lake communities. Thank-you so much for your time, Jeanne, As I’m sure you are aware, the outcome of this subdivision holds emotional as well as financial implications for us. Sincerely, Kathy A. Modares 2480 Old Beach Road Orono, MN 55391 i • .«» . . i « .4ALTERNATE A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FORTOM Mc C arthyOF LOT 4. SHORE HILLS HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ■iS f £ gal 0£SCR|PTI0W of pwchiscs : lot 4, Shore Hills. m Fr ?' "‘S'f•«'''> I-roptrt,. .nd the locetlon of in9 s ed thereon. It toes not purport to show my other improvenents or encrojchments V- 4 :v OBCNIDtT Sn'BH'IN Dan uscwmoN <P r jr» OBAWHVT Coffin & gronberg. Inc,I hmtn- rmifr Uul lhi« Min-rr «r»s prrfvirrd trr •n# <y undrt my dimi iup«T- voMn. And iK a I I am a duly rr^ttif itd Ci»d £n|pncrf an J Lafid Su«Yryor under Ihr bw» ol Ihr Sute ul Mmuvm>U • '*- I t' I ' i . t. 1. • I <1 . '^i: r 4111 \|\ v,rv. Maik S Cumberg Mmnoota iKcmc Number 12755 DATS juawa ^•130 fJ-iJO #. ~ . "0^:^ .v;4. '"3 To: From; Date: Subject: Mayor Callahan & Orono Councilmembers Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator May 12, 1993 #1820 Hennepin County Department of Environmental Management North Arm Access - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Hennepin County originally applied for approval of a conditional use permit for the installation of the seawall at North Arm access in 1986 (review Exhibit E). Early in April, Mr. Bailey of the County advised City staff of specific repairs needed to maintain safety of users of public ramp. Repaii work was scheduled for the week of April 19th. The repair of the seawall requires a conditional use permit. Staff presented the County ’s problem to the Council seeking direction (review Exhibit F). At the April 12th meeting of the Council, members voted to allow the County to proceed with the necessary repairs subject to the condition that the land use application would be filed before the required building permit could be issued by the Orono staff. A building permit has been issued. The repairs took place sometime the week of April 19th. The following ordinance is pertinent for this review: Section 10.03, Subd. 19 - Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to .....repair any seawall.....without a conditional use peimit issued by the Council List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Dennis Bailey Letter 4/9/93 E - Original Plan for Seawall Installation 1986 F - Staff Memo to Council 4/8/93 G - DNR Letter 4/27/93 H - Gustafson Report 5/7/93 I - Plan for Repair of Seawall - Current Application Review of Application Refer to Exhibits E and I. The repair involves the replacement of existing wooden seawalls adjacent to the ramp area and replacement with steel sections. A building permit was issued by the City. As required, the repairs were designed by a licensed engineer. Zoning File #1820 May 11, 1993 Page 2 Please review Exhibit H, the engineer ’s report. Upon our site inspection, staff obser\ed Lhc three locations where run-off flows directly through three curb cuts within the surrounding bituminous curb that defines the paved parking area. We observed vegetation and debris that collected in the parking area that was now washed to the shoreline. As Gustafson ’s report notes, it is the invisible pollutants that raise the most concern, specifically oils, pollutants and nutrients that are flushed into the lake with the initial downpour. The issue of water quality from the stormwater that collects on the parking area was never addressed in 1986. In light of recent State directives and the City’s long-standing goal reflected in ordinances that call for improvement and maintenance of water quality, staff recommends that we begin a dialog between both City and County to determine the best treatment facility and a reasonable deadline for installation. Staff has discussed the City’s concerns with Dennis Bailey and a copy of the engineer ’s report was faxed to his office. Bailey seemed to be supportive of our recommendation but wanted first to review the various treatment facilities listed in engineer ’s report. Staff asked if an installation deadline of next spring seemed feasible and he felt it would be. Suggested Recommendation To recommend approval of a conditional use permit for the Hennepin County Department of Environmental Management for repairs to a section of a seawall at the North Arm access as shown on plans for Hennepin County Proj.ct No. 9209, Sheet 2 of 2 by Wayne Shoo, a registered professional engineer, dated May 6, 1992 with a request that County install a facility for surface water control as it relates to sediment and debris that washes into Lake Minnetonka from the paved parking area and that the City work with the County in formulating the best alternative for the development of that facility. It is further recommended that the control be developed sometime prior to the boating season of 1994. 4 > ■ CITY OP ORONO — GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATIONPROPERTY LOCATION County Road 5 1—200' west of Co. Rd. 19 - 3700 North Shore DriveSite Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. _ _ _ applicant Name Denis Bailey Phone (home) Phone (work) Hennepin County Address A17 Nnrrh V-ifth <;t-rppt----------------------- . hp ls zip 55401-1109 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __ Phone (home) Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land FEES - CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS - $ 50,00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration CITY OF DRONO FltmE OFFICE 1350200000 . ^ 01 CEH 20O.00 CHECK Ji 200.00 RECEIFT-THAKK YOU ^271160 cool ROl T14:: 04/29/ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain - - Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more , X- Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals i other - see fee schedule I • SA1 ■ A [•J«T*X«l iir#Tt4i):iw iiEra Mill#] ua:< r«vsK*( •itni*[•JfliC#] [•wr«] ting 7lic can obtai Governmer if land ! list of FED. Please ation has complete aired or es (staff incurred supplied further sultantSr )Oses of sfore the .d on the cheduled Licant is ■ have an & Zoning mu OATI 0^/15/9J MTCN 004 PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER HAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR *^ROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR I* HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0HNER3 LIST 58 06-117-25 54 0006 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO COUNTY or HENNEPIN HENN COUNTY ■;■*.** 56 06-117-25 54 0044 05616 NORTH SHORE DR E D JOHNSON t p j jomsm EUGENE JOHNSON/PAUIA JOHNSON 5616 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA MN 55591 56 06-117-25 54 0052 05675 NORTH SHORE DR HARRY SKRYPEC HARR/ SKRYPEC 5675 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA HN 55591 56 06-117-25 54 0057 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NANCY L BLAIR NANCY L BLAIR 5501 VILLAGE DR EDINA HN 55659 56 17-117-25 21 0011 05705 NORTH SHORE DR H SULLNOLD ET AL N/L EST DR HAROLD SULLNOLD 5705 NORTH SHORE DRIVE NAYZATA HN 55591 ‘ .» ' I . • . * ^ : *' ^ t* ' • ' 58 08-117-25 54 0055 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK 4/15/79 ST DEED 156754 58 08-117-25 54 0050 05655 NORTH SHORE OR A A f) HAGEN AL A DONNA HAGEN 5655 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA MN 55591 58 08-117-25 54 0055 05685 NORTH SHORE DR R G RESSLER A S RESSLER REX G RESSLER 5685 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA MN 55591 38 08-117-23 34 0058 05768 NORTH SHORE OR NANCY L BLAIR NANCY L BLAIR 5501 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55459 TOTAL BATCH 004 00015 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 10 58 08-117-25 54 0042 05816 NORTH SHORE OR E 0 JOHNSON A P F JOHNSON EUGENE A PAULA JOHNSON 5818 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA MN 55591 58 08-117-25 34 0051 05669 NORTH SHORE DR NARREN E BERG ET AL N/L EST NARREN E BERG 5669 KD SHORE DRIVE NAYZATA MN 55591 58 08-117-25 54 0054 05685 NORTH SHORE DR GLENN C UPTON GLEfW C UPTON 5685 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-ii/-25 21 0010 01610 SHADYNOOO RD DAG ROGERS DONALD A GAIL ROGERS 1610 SHADYNOOD RD NAYZATA MN 55591 • • 1 r:‘ ___ RUN OA^E W/15/9S BATCH 004 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST ♦ . V • • •• • • •. i > ‘ f VV M * • • I I » %4 < * * ■ S-.?. s , . . •» • * ^ # . • . *vv-A * .. » ; : ' .. r*; >v ‘ - JkV . . ■ *■ ••» -f ■‘■'•fi. '■■ :■ ■ *■ -.^ •• ,, •• -S 'i i •>’. ■ •.!. 4* . • • * I* ’ .• „ - » ^ ^ . .* ♦ 4. . «l' ' 1 ••.V • * ^,Vr» ' • ' • * ■ • ♦ % s ;• , .1; * • ‘ ' » '" • » % »\ \ . »V. • .• I i . • ■» • /.• • . T : », V.v. ♦ • ‘ ••r .‘ '** • ’» •1 . ' .V V ' . •• »\ ^ ■ , S; . !S • -M -.' ’ .'•; ■■■■ 5. ; .M-. . ; ■ * • ■■ ‘. ■:• -I t - .. ■: ; • • • . •■ I'/at . 't.■■..■ •- .. •• IM REPORT NO. P1455<i01 PAGE 11 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF BATE i * ,« • t t • f t i . f « • •* » . ' ♦ * • I I ’i.* ■ r » ! >,V I . ♦ ; 1 1» ’ \ # ,*# r A. , - "rAi l II n-^ r hi I- r HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN 417 North Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1309 Phone; (612] 348-6846 FAX: (612) 348-8532 1L ^ ? -f v.« in • 1 •r* -• « A * V f/ XV . / n ■ \ April 9, 1993 APR 12 1SS3 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Ms. Mabusth: I would like to obtain the city’s approval for replacement of the wooden retaining wall on each side of the boat ramp at the Hennepin County access on North Arm (Hendrickson Access). The existing retaining wall is unsafe and not totally functional. Attached are the plans for the work which should take 4-5 working days and commence as soon as possible or about April 19, 1993. I would appreciate any help the City of Orono can give to expedite this process for approval which will also be obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to call me at 348-4378. Sincerely, Denis Baily Lake Improvement 1 i\corr\bftn«jr\MbMftt!i HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer h '.W w ——A ^W w * ^ Mww — • Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk& Associates Engineers A Architects Om G U e*u*<*> ' § • C ec Ma-\ r L V'.'VJS ^5 t ^w<rr»* Pf Ce-'l Crc* *£ T*>0-r-J| I S^-^J Shcr-t G. k*'^r'<r.L S.I1- M. Citnn C "A •V* ©' CC'*lwU'^! a Sar*fc M f*» A G:?r!5- »f A:.**e ‘* f # »• • c'4"5 wV »ci:e' *? CevcC •cret C tu5ie« a • a .f'7 A A *-4“ior. ?£. 3 A.'v?'>d A, A Dc"a^ Z lu^sr^! *f tfHynxi f Angwl »fc fir*ee^ Me'rir^ Af V'.^er • *J-. M p ; 9*-e >-£ A;^fi Vi tr^ A c» T«»*—j| ’Jl •! C lyc*' ^e-^ei » Mjt'-a a# D Aftiwh. Af Ae*'^fL" A A"ce'tcn A| Mjm t kc.\ •? Vjm A. Wo Pi Ci v 0/ Vc. en. A£ r#- e'; Ai^ Xei WA-^dt Afi A»«0 J Cjiwe% A| Mi « C V ei 9 ->'*if ^ U *•• D G'i^ ' As I Wf'^e'*- AT Gi'v r. <'t?c*u Pt • ”3i:d s^ir*' *r f VJSA A| 33.511 -I 9e^.*t Af V'JAH D GwtuM-A Aff CfcJiO O.Vff »i A ff fnu:rt :?3 M ^rA^*i*y *- »•#.*' M C'$9n H- Hay 7, 1993 Ms. Jsanns A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Offics Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Ra: Hennepin County Seawall Repair File No. 139-1820 Dear Jeanne, Si S?Iing^araa?^^At‘threi! iocation2°the'^rSnoff°f?ow2“into^ths lake through 3 foot wide rurb cuts. It is obvious that » sediment presently washes into the lake due to the parking lot. ,, Probably more important is the fact that this hardcover collects oils, pollutants and nutrients that ars flushed Into the lake during rainfall events. The critical period of a rainfall event flushing during the first few minutes of a storm. W« have soma suggestions regarding the surface water control as it relates to the sediment and debris that washes into Lake Mi.nnotonka from the paved parking area. ExciS!!ti‘ar.a» In tha parking lot low pointa. Tha '“'^Ing $*.ip?!r2yS?.f«?k!"’ !s."2«2”Sio™i*bi“ibo5a''' the normal water level of the lake to function properly. At some Pjjjjt in time, t.te granular media would need to be removed and replaced with fresh matsiTial. ExcaSItl'an infiltration trench along the parking lot perimeter. The tJIIS would be tSo feet wide and filled with sand and pea gravel. Some of the runoff would infiltrate into the ground and reach ^*^^2 hv interflow instead of overland flow. Pollutants and nutrients would bl by att!ShiS| to tha granUlar material. Th. •««vation mu.t be above the normal water level of the lake to function properly. To maxim..ze this option, the existing curbing along the perimeter of the parking lot should be removed. V / M PHONE NO. 772—7910 "VV STATE OF ^ [M]D^[iS(0)irz2^ ^ ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Metro Waters, 1200 Warner Rd. , St. Paul, I-IN 55106file no April 27, 1993 Hennepin County Public Works Attn: Denis Bailey 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8568 RE: Permit #89-6391 Extension, Lake Minnetonka (27-133P), Hennepin County Dear Mr. Bailey: reguested in your reply to our telephone call of April 20, 1993, the expiration date of Permit #89-6391 is hereby extended to June 23, 1994. Please note that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, the peiTnit can only be kept active for 5 years, thus the Juno 23, 1994 expiration date. However, it would be possible to do maintenance in accordance with Special Provision #17 in the future, even after expiration. All other terms and conditions of the permit shall remain in full force and effect. Sincerely, '(/j, ,lo/^W. Knudson Acting Regional Hydrologist cc:Minnehaha Creek Watershed District LMCD City of Orono City of Spring Park S. Walter, Conservation Officer DNR Fisheries, D. Zappetillo ■I I. 1 2 S 19S3 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I •j u ¥r i• < { •' v>^ r? A ,) .-:.i;..' 'ij p i. To:Mayor Callahan & Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator April 8, 1993 Hennepin County/North Arm Access - Repair of Sea Wall Dennis Bailey of Hennepin County contacted staff on Thursday, April 8th advising of the need to replace timber walls at approximately 28 ’ in length at either side of public ramp at North Arm Access (review attached exhibit). We originally reviewed a conditional use permit (Application #989) for the installation of the sea wall in 1986. The Code requires a conditional use permit for the repair of sea walls. Mr. Bailey advises that the current condition of the timber walls are a hazard to the public who use the ramp. Mr. Bailey has advised that it is imperative that the wall be repaired before the season opens to boaters. The contractor is scheduled to commence the repairs the week of April 19th. Bailey was advised that it was impossible to get the conditional use permit application before the Planning Commission and meet the April 19th deadline. The following options of action are available to Council: A.Allow applicant to proceed with necessary repairs but require the filing of the required conditional use permit before repairs begin. .Application would be reviewed at the May Planning Commission meeting as an after-the-fact application. The County must submit plans for Building staff and Engineer’s review prior to installation. A building permit will be required for the repair work. B.Advise County that a conditional use permit for the proposed repairs would be required before the City would grant a building permit. Mr. Bailey has advised that in this case the repairs would not commence until after tlie boating season, sometime in the fall of 1993. Council Action Provide staff with directions for Hennepin Countv as to appropriate action to proceed with necessary repair of sea wall. A k . n-fai------------ifi -- TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building Zoning Administrator DATE:May 11, 1993 SUBJECT: #1822 Mark Prueter, 3215 Cr>'stal Bay Road - Variances - Public Hearing The applicant proposes an 18’ x 26’ twj story addition to the rear of the existing strucnire. The addition will be placed over an existing deck and stair structure. The lakeside deck and access stair will be reduced in size from 19’ x 15’ to 18’ x 10’6". In order to minimize impact of the additional hardcover, applicant proposes removal of existing hardcover improvements. The construction of the deck will require an average lakeshorc setback variance. The new deck will reduce the encroachment by 2’6'*. Zoning District - LR-IC Total lot area = 12,174 s.f. Total lot area exclusive of Crystal Bay Road easement area = 11,474 s.f. (road easement area = 700 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side setback variances A. Addition - west side yard Required =10’ Existing = 6 ’ Proposed = 6 ’ Variance = 4’ or 40% B.Aedition - east side yard Requu^d = 10’ Existing = 9’6" Proposed = 7’ Variance = 3’ or 30% C.Replacement deck - side yard Required = 10’ Existing = 3’ + or - Proposed = 3’ *+ or - Variance = 7’ or 70% •4 . >. Zoning File ^1822 May fl, 1993 Page 2 Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback Existing = 12’ Allowed = 0 Proposed = 9’6" Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover A. 0-75’ setback area Allowed = 0 Existing = 3,200 s.f. (3,900 - 7(X)) Existing = 607 s.f. or 18.9% Proposed = 552 s.f. or 17.2% B.75-250’ setback area = 8,274 s.f. Existing = 2,431 s.f. or 29.4% Proposed = 2,496 s.f. or 30.2% Net increase of 65 s.f. or .8% 4.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage for lots less than 1.99 acres Total lot area = 12,174 s.f. Existing coverage = 1,426 s.f. or 11.7% Allow-J = 1,826 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 1,727 s.f. or 14.1% Description of Request The existing structure was built prior to the first zoning regulations established in 1955. The lakeside deck received variance approvals in 1978. In early discussions with the applicant, we reviewed all existing improvements to determine what improvements were non-essential. The wooden plank back walkway at 159 s.f. is essential for the rear yard because as applicant s addendum notes it is a collection area for runoff from the higher elevations to the rear of the property. Applicant ’s garage is entranced via a driveway that accesses from the east ov<rr the railroad property that abuts property at the south side. Based on the lakeside view windows of the adjacent residences, the replacement deck improvement will have minimal impact on lakeshore views as properties are located on high bluffed areas with lakeshore yards 100’ + in*length. Zoning File #1822 May 11. 1993 Page 3 Although hardcover excesses exist within the 75-250’ setback area, stracniral coverage of the lot does not exceed the allowed 15%. Excesses of hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area result from the off street parking area adjacent to road. This type of parking area is essential on a road like Cr}'stal Bay Road where the traveled road is no wider than 14 ’ and the steep drop to the lakeshore is within a few feet of the roadway. Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit H. Issues for Consideration 1.Applicant has reduced hardcover with the front deck access stair structure by 82 s.f., the front walkway within the 75-250’ setback area has been reduced 63 s.f., the side walk at a 128 s.f. along west side of house has been totally removed. What other existing improvements should be considered for removal? 2.Should the addition, be reduced in width to meet the required side setback and extended further south in the rear yard Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that all hardcover removals must be completed pnor to building inspector ’s footing inspection for new addition. Options of Action Approval subject to conditions; or Denial. If demal is your recommendation, then please refer to the necessary findings in Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) 1-12. ii ill ■ III flAliMiliii iBiiii ■ T ’ l',l ; > ^ #1,Q90 CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLIcrfrioN ^ ' v/'•'v --'7 Initial Application Fee $175.00 CITY OF CRQSO ($50.00 per each additional variance) ___FI^A^CE CFFICE Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 l^-ZCJVi'OOO (no change from original application) t.J i.£,V Variance for non conforming use $200.00 CyEiS U. 2E5mL After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 32.//^«/ - - - - - -- property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) ^^^ ^- - - Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_ _ _^/3o/9/_ _ ___(month/year) I (do<rdqljiat^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Pres«rE"^:^f property: V residential - -^other(specify)- - - - - - - - Zoning District:_ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '’h®"® (home) ~/y/ '^4- - Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (wor):) rfr 30^-0- - - Address: *?2/j~ City: JZ^TE^^E^EEEEZ. OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)- - - -—-- - - - - ^ J Name __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - -- ! Address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ilT. ''DES^IPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost %tJ^^U£££- - - - - Describe request in detail; / X -7-;r ^_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _'_ _ _ __T;. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___ Lot Width y^ardcover ___^Lot Coverage ! ysetbac)c: ___ Front ----- Rear ----- Average La)ceshore _ _Other (specify)^_ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _i HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION op unusual property CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual proper! conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:- - - - v.-f r. 1 (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of 'the following information must be submitted by the applicatior deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. _Conpleted Application Form 2. _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _ _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic surv’ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8><"xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Contnission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature (^^7^Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cam&ission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. z‘lb RUN DATE 03/26/93 BATCH 002 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTIH PROPERTY OHNERS LISTPROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR'7^36 17-117-23 61 000800036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED R I J 6ERSIE ROBERT D BERSIE 3159 l«>RTHVIEH RD NAYZATA HN SSl^l rr PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER ’ NAME/ADDR 36 17-117-23 61 0011 03205 CRYSTAL BAY RD R A ANDERSON A L K ANDERSON RICHARD ANDERSON BOX 135 MINNETONKA BEACH m 55361 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 62 16-117-23 32 0013 03156 NORTHVIEN RD EDYTHE BRONN MISEL EDYTHE BRONN MISEL 3156 NORTHVIEN RD NAYZATA MN 55391 « V.- #■ 0 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 62 16-117-23 12 0060 03159 NORTHVIEN RD RAJ BERSIE ROBERT D BERSIE 3159 NORTHVIEN RD NAYZATA MN 55391 0 i: V; ' ] 0 • .4 ...» 5.. •‘..5 0 c • * ■ ■ -i • :V . j . • * - Z , » » * ■» » REPORT NO, PI635601 PAGE 636 17-117-23 61 000903235 CRYSTAL BAY RD DUHAVr4E L SCHIBILLA AND NIFE DIAUYNE L SCHIBILLA 3235 CRYSTAL BAY RD NAYZATA HN 55391 36 17-117-23 61 001003215 CRYSTAL BAY RD MAI<^ R PRUETER MARK R PRUETER 3215 CRYSTAL BAY RD * NAYZATA MN 55391 t • * 38 17-117-23 61 0012 03255 CRYSTAL BAY RD C HILLIAM HOLFE AND NIFE C HILLIAM HOLFE 3255 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 61 0016 03265 CRYSTAL BAY RO LEROY J ERGER A NIFE LEROY J ERGER 3265 CRYSTAL LAY RO NAYZATA MN 55391 62 16-117-23 32 0016 00082 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED RICHARD A t LEESA K ANDERSON RICHARD A A LEESA K ANDERSON 3205 CRYSTAL BAY RO BOX 135 tUNNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 62 16-117-23 32 0056 50062 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO RICHARD A A LEESA K ANDERSON RICHARD ANDERSON BOX 135 MUJNETONKA BEACH HN 55361 C)£) ' f TOTAL BATCH OOZ 00010 * \ * * • f • • .• I.$ • • 'V • ... V . 4 • • * .■ ■ _ • - A *• V \ V • • •.. . » > t J• ■ .•$^ , • ' ' . ' • 1 .• •«* 1 * • . ' * • • 1 • 1' • 1 .■ •- f\f' ;• • • ' *• ♦ 4. •• . / 4* ‘ % 1 i ^ '* • 4 , • 'i • •. 1 • . .•‘ V.. f I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INF0RHAT1CR4 AS IT APPEARS IHIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE AW BELIEF., : 1%.I f • > DATE '.lA- f > ■ . t . *'! ' ■ t . ■ N 4 % • . 0 ' t - •''l' '• 9 »••V ■1 ' * i » ■■■}!, \t>- 'A; ^ • r'i T 1 ' « ' ♦ i A ' • ♦ » % : • :> >r • V •). i*'. ; • ‘‘f; A ’ • • • /* • •* Tv •• » f : • » •• A ‘I »V. . h ‘ A ■P , 1, >:hv; Tt ^ <r:.i 1 !.>■ (--xJ ir.iTf I , 6f nr LOf$ «/. <5. 57. 50. 60. rO « 71 t«uAa‘S *0011 icM 10 IK vru As£ Of Mi*#<^c»rA »^ V*C »i IK WSC, r 511) •5 * „U5)/i'*AW ^../ A''/ (58)» 3 tl (G9) 1000 . f-6 Mf«5 r3 t OLD COUNTY RD * S I (3) ____trr 33 ^ S (4) ___BLS*____' *<•) 1 LAFA7E1 'CO 5 ^ V 3 1/^ (15)2 ( 16) »(.oy » 4 5 ICO ICO » C A ..y '■\% (12) 4 rt.. ? nw y ^ i ^ V *T •'■•f •. ’{v■ -.f: • •’. »▲ ... .- // axpT'^ki LS. 1 1 ) ' ) ■) iTV^ :• ; HARD COVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Sot Back Zone: 75'-250' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ITEM LENGTH X WIDTH mm —S.F. House 24 X 26 s 024 S.F. Front Deck 1 2 X 19 =228 S.F. Front Deck Stairs 15 X 3 •=45 S.F. Front Cement Slab 7 X 10 =70 S.F. Front Walkwav 4 5 X 3 s 135 S.F. Side Walk 64 X 2 •128 S.F. Rear Deck 26 X 5 =1 30 S.F. Rear Deck Stairs 12 X 4 48 S.F. ^''Back Walkway • 53 X 3 1 59 S.F. Garage •y •>X 20 • / t S.F. ^ Walkwav 2'X2’ pads 11 X 4 S.F.s 44 S.F. Stairs 25 X 3 =75 S.F. Bsmt Door Landing 4 X 4 “16 S.F. Drivewav 1o X 19 *28 5 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (A)r 2431 S.F. TOTAL FROFERTV AREA IN ZONE (B)-8274 S.F. (A) 2431 / (B)8274 X 100 n 29.4% i f » f r / / --------N ) ) ‘ ) ’•- • »• % '* PROPOSF.D AnnmoN HARDCOVER CAfXlLATIONS ITEM LENGIH %•-V Wli»lll s . - - --S.F. House 42 X 2 b -1092 S.F. Front Deck 10.b X =191 S.F. Front Cement Slab $$X 10 70 S.F. Front W a i k v; a v 1o X 4 S.F.*72 S.F. * 2 X 2 pads Back Walkway 53 X 3 s 1 39 S.F. Back Deck Stairs 12 X 4 IZ 48 S.F. Garage 22 X 20 =4 4 4 S.F. W'a 1 kwa >' 2'X 2' pads 11 X 4 S.F.s 44 S.F. Stairs 25 X 3 ss 7 5 S.F. Bsmt Door Landing y X 4 iZ5 16 S.F. Driveway 1 5 X ••285 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE (A)s 2496 S.F. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE (B)s 3274 S.F. (A) 2530 /> B) 82 7 4 X 100 =30.2% i i 4 » IT t <• • y / 3 / / ■* t 7/ THIS ITEM HAS BEEN MICROFILMED Pint r>Mr"oy for StGver. A. Hovorb'r? in Lot 1, Block 2, Tours its of I^r.frJon Park !!or.r.nain Cmnt;/, J-’inr.GSOta Certificate of 5ur'/oy: I hereby certify that this is a tree nnri <~orrcct reoresent-ntior of n sur'/ey of tho bo’inc.v.ries that part of Lot 1, Plook ?, ar.c! of that oart of Vorthorn Avnnne, now vacated I Townaite of Lnn.'n^on Park, described as ^ollows; to-wit: Coranencinr at the point of inter section of the Fortherl:' line of the right-of-way of the Great Northern Railway Genoany wi th the Southerly ex tension of the divldinr line betv/cen Lots 1 ar.d C i-n said Plo<'> ?, Tovr.rita of Langdon Park; thence Northwesterly alorf. the dividing line between said Lots 1 and 2 and sars extended, o distance of 21?.14 feet; thence Korth<“asterlv deflecting right at an angle of 82°55' from last described course, a distance of 180 feet to the actual ocint of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence continuing fren said actual Txjint of beginning ffortheasterl*^ on the extension of said last described line, a distance of 60 ^'eet; thence Southeasterly in a straif'’t lino 26?.P feet to a point in the line of said right-of-way of the Great Northern Railway Cor.pany, which oolnt is 140 feet Northeasterly, censured along the Northerly line of said railroad right-of-way, fror the initial point of corv- cencenont; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly right-of-way line 35 feet; thence I’orthwesterly in a straight line 247,7 to the actual point of beginning; ALSO including all that part of Lot 1 in said Block 2 lying between tho Northwesterly line of the premises horeinabove described and the shore of La.<e Minnetonto, and between the Northerly extension of the Northeasterly and Southwesterly side lines of the prer:ises hereini^bove first described; and the loca xon o a existing buildings thereon. Tt docs not puroort to show o . er mprovemen ^ or encroachments. Scale Date o 1« = 40* 9-2-76 Iron marker W/iwi//aGordon H. Coffin Rej^^.'c. 6064 Land S'.ir*.'eyor and Plarjier Long Lake, Klnnosota .1 .7 '■Li'j, IT for jtever. A. linvor'^^rf in Lot 1, rloc< 2, Xcvr.£it3 o'* Lor.cdon r.ir’< ..] I'‘7r.n<7“in C-runty, ?'ir.r.*?£:)ta '^y' THIS ITEIH HAS BEEH ftHCRORLMED Certificat'2 of 5ur*/cy: of •y certify that tr*:e •tnd '“orr'’ct tinr oh a 3ur*.'->y es o-' that ^ 1,Block and of that nart c' N'orthorn Avanua, row varator;, To-'r.ai*'*? of Larrdon Park, desrribc'i ac •^ollou-*; tO“<^it: Coranencin? at th® p^lnt of inter section of the Northerly line of tho ri^ht—if-way of the Great N'crthem P^il’-ray CcT.nar.y vrlth the Southerly ex tension of the "ivliinr line betvoen Lots 1 arn C in said Tour.sito of Lar.fyion Park; thence N’orthucsterly alonf the dividing line bet’-een said Lots 1 and 2 and sane extended, a distance of 2i;?,14 feet; thence yorth®asterlv deflertin" ri^ht at an angle of 82^55' fron Last described course, a distance 130 feet to the actual ocint of beginnlnr of the of land to be described; thence contlnuin actual noint of beglnninr Vcrth®asterl*' cn the extension of said last described line, a distance of 60 hoet; thence Southeasterly in a stra-ir'’t lino 263.2 feet to a point in the line of said right-of-way of the Greet northern Pjiilvn.y Conrnany, which oolnt is 140 feet ?'crtheasterl7, ^ensured along th? Northerly line o'* said milroad right-of-way, fror the initial point of corv- nencerent; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly right-of-way line 35 feet; thence ^?orthwo3terIy In a straight line 247.7 feet to tho actual point of beginning; ALSO including all that part of Lot 1 in said Block 2 lying between the Northwesterly line of the prerdscs hereinabove describes and the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and between the Northerly extension of the Northeasterly and Southwesterly sice lines of the promises hereiri«bove first described; and the location of all existing buildings thereon. It docs not puroort to show other i.-nprovenents or encroachrents. Scale Date o 1” = 4C' 9-2-76 Iron r.arker Wn WJ/AGorden H. Coffin Lard Sur-.-eyor and Planner Long Lake, Mi.nnesota :.r bC64 IL\KUSH1P r-0 ). .* i.) : ^.. S •‘w• Several characteristics ot this propertv inhibit the abitlity to meet the 25Z (75’-25U’) hardcover liniitiation and set back requirements. L A. B. C. D. Home constructed prior to existin>; .loning requirements. Thus making it extrenK?iv ditticuit tor proposed addition to comply with these regulations. No additional land available tor expansion. Thus effecting complaince to the hardcover and side set back requii ements. Shape ol Lot: With the lot becomming progressively narrower from iakeshore to rear, this limits the area on which to build. Therefore restricting the design to add more livable space to our home. The topographv jf the lot, ie. steep slope at rear creates poor drainage and necessitates the need tor the back walkway, therefore inhioiting hardcover compliance. »• i!f'l I’ • ' ■i • i - •?v ■3: ■i I, *J.VN ■ ' S'. .,A.vf- ■‘.i •V *' 1 ^ « » I*f ! i-k ii -■i 3 . .krtltV ! ' i . *. E t IKr- c;< p I s lA :l . ) * V ♦ - • . ; fri* !: f W ■ ' ♦ • ' * ■ • V*?.* ^ f :V\:-',v •.V-*- : ..-.j t. ■ 1*. V. . ,.V-' 5 5' To:Mavor Callahan & Orono Councilmembers Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Mav 12, 1993 #1823 Marge Rossing, 130 Cygnet Place - Variances - Public Hearing The applicant has applied for variances to permit construction of a 20’ x 28’ 2'/i-story addition to the west side of the existing residence requiring street and real setback variances. In 1989 applicant received approval for a setback variance to the rear lot line with the installation of a deck. The applicant also proposes the installation of a 26’ x 30’ detached garage that meets the required 15’ setback for structure at 9S8 s.f. in area. Review E.xhibit I, topographic mapping of the area. Half of the property is located within 300 of the ^wan Lr^e tributary. Staff has considered the entire lot area for hardcover purposes. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: 1. Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (A) Rear and street setback variances required. A.Rear Required = 50’ Proposed = 28.82’ Existing = 11’ 4" Variance for new construction = 21.2’ or 42.4% B.Street Setback Required = 50’ Proposed = 41.14’ Existing = 37 ’ Variance = 8.6 ’ or 17.2% 2.Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover limitation for properties located within the shoreland areas of tributaries. Total lot area = 71,734.5 s.f. or 1.64 acres Allowed = 17,933.7 s.f. or 25% Or Allowed = 21,520.5 s.f. or 30% Proposed = 9,392.5 s.f. or IJ%* * House = 2,492 s.f., deck = 1,275 s.f., existing garage = 750 s.f., proposed garage = 988 s.f., paved area = 3,887.5 s.f. 1 . i Zoning File #1823 May f2, 1993 Page 2 3. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (2) Total allowed area of accessory structures = 2,000 s.f. Existing = 750 s.f. Proposed = 1,738 s.f. (750 s.f. + 988 s.f.) List of E.xhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - 0 - ll - I - J - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant ’s Addendum Survey Submitted with ApplicaMon #1387 Elevations Floor Plans Proposed Site Plan Topographic Map - Definition of Shorelands Adjacent to Tributaries Resolution #1387 Description of Request Applicant proposes a 28’ x 20’ 2'A-story addition to the west side of the existing residence requiring rear and street setback variances. In 1989 applicant received approval for a rear setback variance for the deck installed at the north side with the final setback at IT 4". Applicant also proposes the installation of a detached garage measuring 26’ x 38’ at a total 988 S.f. area. The structure requires a 15 ’ setback from all lot lines and clearly meets the setback standard with 57 ’ setback from the rear and a 64’ setback from the street lot Unes. The detached struemre will retain the required 10 ’ separation from both the principal struenre and the existing garage. At the time of the platting of the Swan Lake Subdivision, the minimum area standard was 25 000 s f and 120 ’ width at building line. In April of 1969 when the house was constructed on ’the property, the property was zoned R-IC requiring a minimum of 1 acre and a 140’ width with 35’ front, 30’ rear and 10 ’ side setbacks. The house was placed 25’ from the rear !rl une instead of the required 30’ (no record of a variance setback). All other required setbacks were satisfied. Review Exhibit I. A third of the property is located within the shoreland area of the adjacent tributary. Staff has considered the total lot area in determining approved hardcover. Total hardcover with proposed improvements is at 9,392.5 s.f. or 13%. At 25% hardcover the property would be allowed 17,933.7 s.f. or at 3U% 21,520.5%. Clearly there is no hardcover problem for the property. 4 Zoning File ^^1823 May \2, 1993 Page 3 Review Exhibit D. Mrs. Rossing reviews the need for the addition and notes the second accessory structere is now needed to house the cars stored in the attached garage now to be convened into living space within the principal strucmre. As already noted above in the pertinent ordinances, the property with less than 1.99 acres is allowed a total ot 2,000 s.f. ot accessory- strucnires. Applicant ’s total accessory structures are proposed at 1,738 s.f. Applicant advises that in addition to the construction of the proposed addition, the design of the root w ill be changed and new siding provided for the entire structure. The Citv has received no comments from the neighbors notified for the variance review. Statement of Hardships Review Exhibit J. The following hardships and findings are appropriate for this review. 1. Unusual shape of lot. 2. House located on lot prior to existing zoning setbacks. 3. Principal structure met zoning standards at the time of constmetion in 1969 and was allowed to be constructed 25’ instead of 30 ’ from the rear lot line. 4. Interior layout of house limits construction of addition to the west side. Issues for Consideration 1.Will the addition to tlie west have an impact on adjacent neighboring properties? Note property to immediate west is an undeveloped City park. The property to the immediate north (proposed Wirtjes subdivision. Lot 2) is at higher elevations and based on proposed location of house, the addition will have no impact. The City has received no comments from the neighbors notified for the variance review. 2.Mrs. Rossing has had a difficult time with maintaining outside storage of varied constiuction equipment stored on the property. Staff would recommend that approval ol the variance include a condition that applicant be required to store all construction vehicles and equipment within accessory strucmre and if equipment is to be stored outdoors that appropriate screening be provided. Options of Action Approval as proposed. Or Conditional approval. OR Denial. X » /V CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION^ , '-•• <i •*' iInitial Application Fee $175.00 j"jr /arianc€e)($50.00 per each additional vari Renewal Vaiiance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) # ••*'rVTv *r r ~nkin ,r;r»iAvrr ncc7>-'C • •• • • • « ^ ^ ^ » I f. ». .f .1 w'w V'i. V'W\ V V' .i V.*S.J / Lrri T7 ^ 7r: r X I w*»V 1 Th a ».»*f r>LTC7Zf T« 7 J ' fi ‘ ViH iI # i #n»%i\ I Lp'i/ PROPERTY INFORMATION 4T‘7/>47n C*»*> f »T«; » I V Wvv^a liv'A ■ Site Address 0^/22. Property Identif. Number (P.I «D. ) //7-P3 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Dat^l^Property Acquired /Y\Ci\^lv, !^S4-(month/year) I (d^(clo net) also own the adjacent pa-cels of land. Present use of property; )( residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoning District;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT Name (Yl A >66 € Pc^S lIVCn Phone (home) 4^73~ ^38/ Phone (v;ork) ^U(p Address; I30 Q\J(s>f^B'r City; LPtOCy Zivi^S^S^Co OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address;City;Zip; DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail; Yjd-lL^ ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage 'k Setback;Front Side )C Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property (^nditions preventing oompliance with Zon:^g Code requirements; (attach additional sheets if necessary; REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of t-he following information must be siibmitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. _Completed Application Form 2. _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8h"xll"). 6. _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views 'provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. _ _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign thi^ application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above infomation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to th^best of his/her knowledge. GNNEPn SIGNATURE Applicant's Signature Date - ^-3 The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification >cf this request. Owner's Signature - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Applicant must have all summittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Date t RUN DATE 0A/25/W'T batch 001 HENNEPIN county PROPERTY INFORM' I0?< SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI455<*01 PAGE 1PROP AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR (T 30 04-117-25 22 001000105 CYGNET PL 6 J EHALT ETAL GREGORY J EHALT 105 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE »tl 55356 30 04-117-23 22 001100135 CYGNET PLH R AN0ER5S0N SEE MORIARTYH R ANDERSSON A E E MORIARTY135 CYGNET PL LONG LAKE W 55356 38 04-117-r5 22 001200145 CYGNVT PL A E BLOEMENOAAL ETAL ARTHUR E eiOEMENOAAL RT 1 BOX 50ir LONG LAKE MN 55356 * J •• PROP AOOR ■ 0»t«R NANC TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 58 04-117-25 22 0020 00160 CYGNET PL PA OEOERNAROI A J L OLSON J L OLSON A P A OEOERNAROI 160 CYGNET PL LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0023 00130 CYGNET PL MARGARET 0 ROSSING MARGARET 0 ROSSING 130 CYGNET PL LONG LAKE W 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0027 03085 HATERTOI*i RO HHEATON CONSTRUCTION INC STEVEN A MARCO HIRTJES 3085 HATERT0M4 RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 T-r., * . f PROP AOOR 0»MER NAME 'v . - TAXPAYER « . •NAME/AOOR P V f 58 04-117-25 22 0028 05045 HATERTOHN RO BRUCE C A KATHRYN S HALL BRUCE C A KATHRYN S HALL i ■ ;*>f • 5045 MATERTOW RO f ORONO >tl 55356 , ^ 38 04-117-23 24 0006 00275 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S G R A 8 K COFFIN GOROON A BARBARA COFFIN 3025 hXTERTONN RO ORONO HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 001 00008 I r • 1 • , . ' ’ V• ' - u J! . ^' t ’• r 1 . s I * i f . ,. ’ p , 1. • ^ I I.'. 4 A 4 .♦ 1 . t I - -A - V-V . • .\\\ • 6. . f • ^ i p ** li • ^ ^ ‘ . •-i'iVV':.-,»vv>•.'*•. I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERT); T^ATION, TO^HE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. / y W/^BY ,ij-s < i '.V--/. • ■ • ■, ■ v - ' . = • . • v. M • •* /DATE i / J ^ \ '♦ I - . ■ . V U- fti ■ i'.H. ' •■},' y ’*■ ■ • r ■ i * ;v > * 4 A ‘ r* M ■■ • 1* . ^ ■’’''I ' • ■ : 4 • • . <• /. V i .^ I. T ■'■A I . > ' .V • I» t ..» * y. I'v * ■ Pi, , :s . t j ‘•kV.- : : ( ■- I 4 8 t 'ir' V #5i,. if: • » *. » I V «I • •.* , /O n : i i^\ ir ^0 0^ iOt ^ # ■ ■# —rs—» 1# V 5e7'5«*'j5*«\ ^ «9^ •* (15) i ( 17) ^ • •<• k vk« \ * * ft*. 4 f M :a MARGE ROSSING 130 Cygnet Place Orono', MN 55356 (612) 473-23S1 April 22, 1993 D City Council and Planning Commission City o£ Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, 55323 c* J J j Re: Variance and Permits for Addition and Garage, 130 Cygnet PI Ladies and Gentlemen:• • I a requesting to build these additions to accomodate ray brother and his possessions. My Mother passed away in 1991 and I was appointed Personal Representative for her estate. My brother, who cannot read and write, was always taken care of by my Mother. After her passing, I was appointed his guardian by the Sibley County Court. He is disabled and unable to work and receives Social Security. My brother inherited her house in Arlington, Minnesota, which with the limited amount of Social Security he gets, he cannot afford to live there. Also because he does not drive, I am required to drive to Arlington almost weekly. My biggest concern is that he might get sick and not tell me, and even if he does tell me, I am at least an hour away. Therefore, I have chosen to sell the house in Arlington and move Eugene into my home. Most of the addition to my home will be for his benefit. We are hoping to get permission from Sibley County to use Eugene's funds for this addition. So far this plan is looking very favorable and that this request will be granted. My children are in various construction fields and will provide most of the labor for this project. Since we are changing the roof line on the house and because the present roof is just about due to be replaced, we will reroof the entire house. The present siding is also deteriorated, so that will also be replaced. Becp.’isc? our present garage will become part of the house, we will need a new garage to house our vehicles. We propose to start with the garage so we will have storage during construction. Two of my sons have had considerable experience installing sewer hook-ups. In fact they installed ray present septic system in 1984, that has been working perfectly. Because this addition requires that I hook up to our new sewer, I respectfully request that I be issued the permit to hook up and have my sons do that while excavating for the addition. We can use the dirt from the excavating to fill the old tanks. This should save me considerable $ and because my sons are so knowledgeable in this field, all requirements of the City will be met.* I am trying to carry out my Mother's wishes to take care of my Brother as best I can. I am also operating with budget constraints, so will appre ciate your timely and favorable per-mission to proceed with this addition. Thank you for your time and effors for this project. ^rs trul^ . Marge tossing FCa: CERTIFICATE OF SERVEY M^a6g• ff05S>N^ f ^ x<> # ,i ■ ? Ti-cBi?’Til j "550.T7SS^^* 4i,’ 45"£ /13^.14 A? u/- ■V ^. I: 0% <^K j V LE^f^L bEiCJt»?7itJN LoT-^ I / Z, 3L0CX 3, SwnN LftKS fljJilicn, ,„ . ^ •■«':•. v:*i „ ••', "jT" ■ *? V ; •> * ; •-• : ............ C « WOOD STAKE PLACED B.M.- • SEARINGS ON assumed DATUM • • IRON MON. INPLACE proposed information 1st FLOOR ELEV. [basement ELEV. GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. TOP BLOCK ELEV. drainage 000.0 « EXIST. ELEV. (oOO.oji PROPOSED ELEV. 1^50* EXIST. 4 PROP- ELEV. SCHOBORG lan d SURVEYING Tnc^ I hereby certify that th.s plan, survey or report was prepared by me cr under my direct supervision and that am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Sta Of Minnescuar^ Q > 97:*3221 RL 1. Box 2C9 Cetano. MN 55329 Date 0/1 Lr? -/ogg_____ Registration No. 14700 k % Slff ^ ^ ' X V •nvN Q •Os •fc' Ai- 'n o ? -«8 oC?Cf 0 V) NJ V** ■ I . ; I f I > « : ! i L m . / u J ^RdNOt City of OROrsOHESOLUTIO^^ OF The CITY COUNCIL NO. 2614A BssoLonoa auumw; AH Arm-TSB-PACT VAUASCS TO Ku^ciPAZ. sonac goob SBCTXOB 10.2t, BUBOIVISXOBS 5 (A) nut tiaa? VHBASA8, Margarat D. RoaalDg (harainaftar *tha apcllcaat*) la th* camar of tha proparty locatad at 130 Cygnat Placa within tha City of Orono (haraloaftar "City") and lagally daacribad aa iota 1 and 2, Block 3, Swan laka Addition, Bannapin County, Minnaaota (harainaftar *tha proparty*)i and HUUA8, tha applicant has appliad to tha City for an aftar*^a~ ‘t^ct. varlanca to Municipal Zoning Coda Saction 10.28, SubdiwialoBS S (A) to ponit a dack raconatructad without tha banafit of a building parait to ravoin that is locatad 11*4* froa tha raar lot lino instead of 90* as xaquirad by tha ordinance.-7 ■cm, THUBPORB, BB IT RB80LVED by the City Council of Orono* wi ‘••.v r'' Kinnasotai PIBDIBC8 1. This application was ravlawad as Zoning Pile 41387. 2. The property is locatad in the RA-IB Single Paaily Rural Rasidantial Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. Tha property consists of !♦ acres and was created prior to tha currant xoning standards. J*"’ 3. Tha Orono Planning Coaaission raviawad this application''on March " .^13 20, 1989, and racoaaandad approval of the aftar-tha>fact'Variaaeo;lj*^ ,based upon tha following findingsi • A) Onususl shape of lot. M) Boose locatad on let prior to axiotlng'soning roar setback of the principal structur coda requires a 50* setback. . • - os* ■ -v__ ioting soning standards. Thov^^, :ura is 2S'<«baca tha curraat 6'| n \KpinsA MM 1 mmA 4 im .... . -nini^* Yi* i-r ^ ■'4 •tiiTffaiimt11WZ '*§f^t(ifiMP.^KORdNOtj City of OROIVORESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2614Mr*A RBSOLOnoa GBASmC AJI ArrBX-THV*rACT VAUABCI TOMunciPAi. soKnc coos sscnam io.2S« suBoivisioas s (a)PIZJI ffl307.’/ * __ ®®®A*as» Margaret D. Roaalng (haralnaftar "tha applicant”) Isojwar of tha proparty locatad at 130 Cygnat Placa within tha City of Orono tar "city") and lagally dascribad aa Lota 1 and Block 3# Swan Laka Addition^ Bannapin County^ Hinnasota (harainaftar *tha proparty*)| and ■ WHBRBAfl» tha applicant has applied to tha City for aa aftar*''tha* fact variaaca to Municipal Zoning Coda Section 10.28, Subdivisions 5 (A) to P«t»lt a deck raconstructad without tha benefit of a building paralt to that is locatad 11*4* from tha rear lot line instead of 50* as required by tha ordinance. ■OW, THXSBPOBB, BB IT RJtSOLVED by tha City Council of OroBo*Minnesota t PIBDnCS 1. This application was raviawed as Zoning Pile *1387. 2. The property is located in tha RR-IB Single Panily Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. Tha property consists of 1+ acres and was created prior to tha current sonita standards. * «« Orono Planning CoasBission reviewed this appllcatienTon March 20, 1989, and raconaanded approval of the after**tbe>factvTarlaneaiMf -V ffi Jv B ■ 4. • • A ■ »a upon thm following flndingsi . .A) Unoooal ohap# of lot. , t'lP. A.#- •• • * *^. «* ** L «' - ** *• ' Bobs# locatad on lot prior to existing'soning standitfdsr'' ^ rear setback of the principal structure is 2S*.where the currentfv*' code requires a 50* setback. 2>ocation of house on lot and interior floor.plan.restricts east. and^sj^^^ide,.gf isflliBhCeonstroction of .deck .cn•i. it • r -iV .«M -i fmqm 1 of 4 » mm /V , -w.» - -.-a »>*■>—*.- i \i *v fl V—•■S'.V'l •/*pV < .R'^crr'-^*City cOf* ‘HESOLUTICNO 4. Tha City Council has consi findings and racoaaandations staff, coojDants by tha spp! fact variance on tha health, sa I- f t V . I ^ W' i»t*' 5. Tha City Council finds t property are peculiar to it i property in this toning dlatrl variance would not adversely af P®*c ■ fire hazard or other dan aeroly serve as a convenience t ®llsvlata a daaonstrable hari preserve a substantial property in keeping with the spirit Cocprehenslve Plan of the City. ■j-COK^SIOaS, OROl % Based upon one or more of City Council hereby grants an after ZMiog Code Section 10.28, Subdlvlsio without a building perait to reaai subject to the following conditions} ■'•V 7-- 1. Aothorltitts granted by this wlbh tha applicant# but ara pard application for a building pa Council approval# or thia varian I990)e 2# Violation of or non-coi8{ conditiona of thia variance ahal coda# aball antoaatically tarmii chall ba puniahabla aa a aiadaaia■3« The undersigned appliesnt hj to the tenu of this resolution s - ,/v,V I J ** 4.‘wk ;C *1 VB:':' •\w-fvV-i^vr‘ I j;-r_ti*^;ii«i4'v:;.* • • •.. -->1t.. .; , ' 's• ».«V>Vi' -fe"-' crTv^' I,-»• •- OF . Vl;b^ot^O^City of OROrVORESOLUTION OE THE CITY COUNCIL K.O 261 •*•*v4, Th* City Council has conaidorod thia application Includin? tha flndln98 and racooMandatlona of tha Plannln9 CoBalaalonf .taporta by City staffs coamanta by tha applicant and tha affact of tha aftar-tha- fact variaBCa on tha haalth, aafaty and walfara of tha conaunity* 5, Tha City Council finds that tha conditions axisting on this proparty ara paculiar to it and do not apply ganarally to othar proparty in this roning diatrict» that granting tha aftar-tha-fact varlanca would not advarsaly affact traffic conditions* light* air nor posa a fira hazard or othar dangar to naighboring propartyr would not SMraly sarva as a convanianca to tha applicant* but is nacassary to allaviata a daaonstrabla hardship or difficultyr is nacassary to prasarva a substantial proparty right of tha applicant; and would ba In kaaplng with tha spirit and intant of tha Zoning Coda and Coaprahansiva Plan of tha City. CCMkXDSIOHS* OSOBR AID COIDITXara Baf^d upon ena or aora of tha findings notad abova* tha Orono City Council haraby grants an af tar-tha-fact varlanca to tha Municipal Zoning Coda Saction 10.28* Subdivisions 5 (A) to parmlt a dacJc constructad without a building parait to raaain at 11*4” from tha raar lot lina* Bubjact to tha following conditions; 1. Aothoritias grantad by this raaolution run with tha proparty not with tha applicant* but ara parnlsalva only and must ba axarclaad by application for a building parait within ona yaar of th.. data of Council approval* or this varlanca will axpira on that data (April 10* 1990). . » • ■ ^1 « is% *'1 . .‘^1 f «.> ' 'ii » AvV: ' ;, 2. violation of or non-coap lianca with any of tha tans and - conditions of this varlanca shall constituta a violation of tha sonlngo-s^-'.'. ‘ vs’-' coda* shall autooatically tanlnata any authority grantad harain* and^.-;'^*jf ahall ba punishabla as a aisdaaManor.> • lV‘• ■ • 3* Tb# imd#r0lgn«d applicant haa raad# undaratood and haraby a^raaa to tha tarM of thia raaolution and on bahalf of baraalf # .har haira#^-^^ ^^^^^«aaoeaaoora. and aaalfnai^harabyaaraamifctft-fitb^ ■ y 'J. ^ ^•onoeassora> and assiBnS|^haraby& agraoijfj^t ^^;?iibolntlon in tba chain orV tit la; jof •.tbo*wp^^5t t». —'"n ■ I»• r V, V. '/* y. mm * ' *C“ *"' ^ T ; ' 5" ^Ek•>^- .«> H.1r '' :i City of OROINOf^ESOLUTION OF The CiTV COUNCIL NO. ‘614 Adopted by th« City Council of th« City of Orono, rsgvlar ■••ting h*ld on tho lOth day of April, 1589. 8TATI or MimSSOTA ‘co oMTY cr maniEm as. - A. • - * •• Ai m c Grab#ky Mayor e^%S!S!::£5‘ait vsgy ^■ssfifaisi'ifiu nm foragoing inatruaant was acknowl«dg«d b«for« ■• on this 10^ ^ Aorilf 1989# by Jaoaa R« Crabak 6 Dorothy M. Ballln# Mayor A City vr CXork of *tho City of Orono# a Minnaaota Buniclpal corporation and aaid inatnaant vaa axacutad on bahalf of tha City. Notary Public ______ /o/n^p<; My Coauaiaaloo Ejr,<T.«a -vfj, j h. /AlsA L To:Mayor Callahan & Orono Councilmembers Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, Citv Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & 7.oning Administrator Date:Mav 12, 1993 Subject: #1824 Eric & Shelly Liljequist, 3490 Birch Lane - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District Applicants propose a detached garage within the street yard of their lakeshore property. If garage was placed such that doors faced away from street and a mmaround provided on site, garage could be located 10 ’ from the street lot line. Applicants garage shall have doors facing onto street at a 15’ setback. The minimum setback for such garages is 30’. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: 1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B) - Detached garage structure. Street setback variance: Required = 30’ Proposed = 15’ Variance = 15’ or 50% Section 10.03, Subdivision 14’(C) - Lot coverage review required for all lots under 1.99 acres. Total lot area = 13,894 s.f. (required Allowed = 2,084 s.f. or 15% Existing = 1,162 s.f. or 8.3% Proposed = 1,434 s.f. or 10.3% = 21,780 s.f. or Vi acre) 3. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75 ’ setback area = 3,918 s.f. Existing =0% Proposed =0% 75-250 ’ setback area = 9,976 s.f. Existing = 2,330 s.f, or 23.36% Proposed = 2,023 s.f. or 20.28% r- ?. r___ Zorung File #1824 May 12. 1993 Page 2 List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Neighbors ’ Acknowledgement Fonns Existing Hardcovi»r Fact Sheets Proposed Hardcover Fact Sheets Elevation/Floor Plans Survey Review of Application Applicants propose the removal of the existing single-stall garage and replacement with a two-stall 24’ x 24’ detached structure relocated 15’ from the street line requiring a setback variance of 15’. The existing structure is located 20’. The proposed garage shall be 10’ from the side lot line. The e.^'isting structure is 1.2’. The adjacent Birch Lane (20*) and Baldur Park Road (30’) are narrow at width. The existing garage located 20’ from the street lot line requires backing out into the street for maneuvering a turnaround. At U.at specific point, cars can be coming in three different directions requiring special care for maneuvering in the right-of-way. The new garage and drive will provide no improvement in safety. Staff has asked the engineer to review the site plan for any other option that would provide more safety for the applicants who will use the garage and for the public who travel on the adjacent roadways. One may argue that these are low use roadways but during certain peak times, safety may become a major issue. Staff wiii include anv sketches the engineer provides in your final packets to be delivered on Friday or staff will present them at your meeting. Statement of Hardships Please review Exhibit A. Applicant notes hardships as follows: If garage with doors facing onto road met the 30’ setback, the 10’ separation setback between principal structure and detached structure could not be met. If garage was placed parallel to the sf-et meeting the 10’ side setback and 10’ street setback, a large tree would need to be removed within the street yard. Both proposals requiring extended drive and turnaround area on the site would result in increases in hardcover. Issues for Consideration 1.Would Planning Commission approve hardcover variances for the purpose of increasing safety? 1 i .La... Zoning File #1824 May 12, 1993 Page 3 2. Would members consider granting a side setback variance for a garage with doors facing to the side and turnaround provided on site? Options of Action Approval as proposed. Approval as amended. Denial.I Once again, please refer to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) (1-12) for the necessary findings for denial. f1 CITY OP ORONO ~ VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) t »:1 h • Vf PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 3^)90 BiRCH UNE Present use of property; residential PTTV nr ri*m;r»WA I I W*» wr'w»tu‘Lfii.Ai)-r nccjrc t JLItntVL/L. t/f I ACi. i A w'w'V^ VV V W Property Identif. Number (P. I. D.) 08-117-25 U5_ _ _ _ _ Attach legal description to application if not included on roquireipurvey. Date Property Acquired o/^o/^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) _ __ _ _^ I (S8^(do not) also own they adjacent parcels of land. other (specif r-ucrv Ui fCWtV n i rcy ! 7«v a V A UUlt A I ta* ■ Vv #• A f wf • V T# I i. Zoning District: APPLICANT Name ERIC & SHELLY LiUEQUIST Address:^g0 birch UNE Phone (home>612/971-7255 ___ Phone (wor)c) 612/872~6500 Orono. MNCity;Zio, 65391 OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Address: Phone (wor)c) City;Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 4iQ(X).0Q Describe request in detail; VARIANCE FOR THE REAR SETBACK ATI) FOR THE DETACHED GARAGE 30' MINIMUM SETBACK ___________________________________ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage X Setback; Other (specify) Front Side X Rear ___ Average Lakeshore HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements; In order to accommodate a detached garage at the 30' MINIMUM SETBACK^ THE GARAGE WOUL: ZONE.Bh LESS T:WI the required iJ'FROf'1 THE PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE STRUCTURE. THE.DRIVEWAY F^LAChJ-lhNT WOULD ALSO INCREASE THE NhtD FOR Al)Ul 1 lUNAL HAKUtUVtK iu iMt 73 - 23J Tc Tuc nf\OAnc '.»ac di ^rcTNo/'o/M i ci to tuc ctdcct^’widc c/\r tmc <;ir)p)q JWP A (attach additional sheets if necessary) required submittals All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete 1« ^ Completed Application Form 2. A Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. X Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. y Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8>j"xll" for reproduction). 5. X Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8>s"xll"). 6. ^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll"). 7. _^As an addendiam to this application, please attach a ^separate list of any other persons ^ou wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the abo|^ information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct ^o the bes"^ of his/her knowledge. S -Applicant's Signature Date (Di4/22/93 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this applxcation and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this request^ Date Oi^/22/93Owner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled j^Qvlew meetings of the Planning Coomilsslon and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. fj RUr4 DATE 04/16/nBATCH 001PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR f • PROP AODR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AODR OIBIER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR Ol^tlER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADOR OmER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST3B 08-117-23 A3 0001 03A70 BIRCH LA REX EUGErJE BOLLINGER JR REX EUGENE BOLLINGER JR 3A70 BIRCH LA NAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 OOOA OlAAA BALD'JR PARK RO VIOLET 0ERO3IA VIOLET OEROSIA lAAA BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 0008 03510 NORTH SHORE DR D A J SIKKA DAIJIT A JASHINOER SIKKA 3510 NORTH SHRE DR NAYZATA m 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 0013 03A80 NORTH SHORE OR BRUCE A NUSBAUH BRUCC A NUSBAUH 3A80 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 0023 03A50 BIRCH LA E R ENGLER A B ENGLER EDNARD R A BOTt^IE ENGLER 3A50 BIRCH LA NAYZATA m 55391 38 03-117-23 A3 0027 03A60 BIRCH LA R HILLIAH TOHARO ETAL R HILLIAH TOHARO 3A60 BIRCH LA NAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 000203A90 BIRCH LA E LILJEQUIST A S LILJEOUIST ERIC J A SHELLY R LILJEQUIST 3A90 BIRCH LA NAYZATA HN 55391 3C 08-117-23 A3 0005 OlAAO BALDUR PARK RD R E ENGEBRETSON ET AL RICHARD E ENGEBRETSON A JEAN ENGEBRETSON lAAO f^ALDUR PARK RO HAYZATl HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 0009 03520 NORTH SHORE DR DAVID A SINGER DAVID A SINGER 3520 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 OOIA 03^^* 90 NORTH SHORE DR KENTON H CARLSON ETAL KENTON H CARLSON 3A98 NORTH SHORE DRIVE NAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 0025 03A58 north SHORE DR P E B0»#1AN t B D BLADER PAUL BwiflAN/^ARBARA D BLADER 3AS8 IK)RTH SHORE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00016 REPORT NO. PAGE PIA35A01138 06-117-23 A3 000301AA8 BALDUR PARK RO CORAL N LAHRENCE CORAL H LAHRENCE " ^ nTH AVE SO ♦ 55A17 38 08-117-23 A3 0006 01A36 BALDUR PARK RD HIP NELSON HALLACE E NELSON 6221 HASHBURN AVE S HPLS m 55A23 38 08-117-23 A3 0012 03A70 Ia)RTH SHORE DR HAROLD J BROUELLETTE HAROLD J BROUELLETTE 3A70 NORTH SHORE DR HATZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 0015 03A98 NORTH SHORE DR KID CARLSON KENTON H CARLSON 3A98 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 A3 0026 03A60 NORTH SHORE DR JOHN G NELSON ETAL iri'tfj Mri 36wm HJ shore dr 'ZaTA MN 55391 i«, * » • I ^ ■■• * ! ■ . .4 f. . . . . « . V { t 1 ¥- • : «. tH ( -odji 9K ; ^ M .. » ' ■ • . V . • •• ; ■ •• . '1.. • 7 * € .* t RUN DATE 0A/1A/9S HEffffPIN COUNTY RROPERTV IMTORtlATION SVSTEHprorcrty onkrs list »v ' J- , .-i,'REPOIT NO. PXAS54Q1 • *• «PACE t k\ I k ^DATCN 001 * I ♦ ■ ;i t • j C i O. ■ »-. rl i . V s » ^ ‘ I -.. ■ j>' i 4 * -s \ iP ‘ •V V i” • O'• r*f ♦• ,t 4 's * # f , ♦ 't ( «f * ^ • r » » , ■ i' ‘L ; /‘ •? ‘ • ♦ . • ■• *-* * . «♦ ^ V'.!’ c »’ 1 \ * X r ; ; • .•I- . / • •(. •• *'v<- T- ih . *»'o:!•.^ «•t. f .. i H t.,* . OD : vmf */ . } \ ) ; ' . ' ^V», “ f* • j- •.' •• • V • . . i. *•» ■ >/■<« ' . • (.' '' • . h-< ■ ;•;• V^‘ f • • *• < : * i *;I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE ‘ ' i' ."1 REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEf*«PlN COUNTY OEPARTOENf OF PR0P€W)t-4AXATI0N» TO^WE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. / /_ //( * TV V ‘ n*TC//^ Uf • i^RY X ^ j*'vV ( » »1 .V f : ' r 's *. 't'r * '.■ •c »# ( \•- ■ ; ( ^' \I ^ S'* ^- ? *2:: v.. ..j V. a;-'-*v -. - I* \ i., , ;^*..* r • ‘ ■ •• . \ . . • ‘ -V - •* y ••:••: '*.rV I ' ♦ # . - V :-r«v . > ■ •>*>;.? -'f '.. — • j‘ ***»;^; - •». *'wi%v '-•-£.%• -t* r* ^ O-r^ V'. v-:r -J, .^■\ \ . **-•. . . .»•• * . *^ ' • ■ . ’r^~ “- % ' ■A*.-*',^'- V ‘ *' • . '••••*■« • • V .■*i*'y .*''.■» ’. (i'i ■^•.'•' ■;: •*• ^ :>• 00»’ • ^\ :, A • »-0 -f ■i»* - • f ^ I.• ^ . • -• ^ •* - X'-. .. • * t wv^ 2M‘ji 5? I (we) Adjacent Property Ovmers' Acknowledgement Form ^ f:/. of / / vs -(S/i - P±d'J [print name(s)l [print address ^ r,i^ns for the prcccsed improvement or proposed use of the pro^^'y^Tocated It 3490 BiRCH UnE_ _ _ _ _ _ ^1=° referred to as Land Use Application No ^ <-> rd^“o “d?=la?/;ppyvir;r"^^^ (are) not as e ^ Council that I («e) am (are) aware of t^e itrrcvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use reauires Council approval. / /^ A<1 p r op e/t^^^Owher /jC A .^h Date // V ^ Property Owner ijfe [print name(s)[print address] ^ 4-ha. nlans for the prooosed improvement or proposed use of the p'ro^erTy Tocated at 3490 ElRCH Uhi__________ -Iso referred to as Land Use Application No , , j t, 4-ha+- in #»xecutino this acknowledgement, I (we) amI (we) understand that in execut y ..v,*, or use (are) I °(we) am (are) aware of th^ rmrroverenTplVns^°nd\'hVt\L proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. a - ?O X Property Owner '•>Date If you have any information that may " h^^'^Bui IdH this Land use Application, please Zoning office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeti g M. ^ O AIt 1. O t , ll ' ■ e ■ Vll' \l • • • H;i.RDCCVER CALCULATIOM li'CRKSHEET setback (circle- CNE) 72-250' E.'<istin5 Hardcover im Zone «/% •■ H dl's= *■* .X - _ __ » m S,F, LENGTH WIDTH •• ■■ .J- x' _____ • • • • Pi S.Ri • •• 1 X 3 ( • S.F.• t « • «• • * *k• X 1 m , S.R, • ____________X • •• « •• • 9 S.F. a. Garags ___ X ___« 9 • S.F. • • 1 » IIP • • • C. DRlVeVfAY. • X * ’ • • 9 S.F. • • .• X B m $ S.F. • • D.. Sidewalk *__ x •• % 9 $ 1 1- « ..... X m • S.F. •. , • • • • ' ‘ • ‘ X 1 • S.F. E.pATlo/ . ........ • . . Deck / X • • a M 1 1 « .S.F.• • • C.U h DSCAPS ■•_. X ( 1 • S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIM BY ' . . . X •• • • S.F. PLASTIC”................. SHEET IMG • * ' -• . X • • • • . S.F. • • mt t • • X • S.F. ■ Gi ' ••• Other _ ' _ ’ x • t. S.F.• • ' ' Total H ardcover in Zone - •o , S.F. Total Frcperty Area m Zofis / 9 O'I •B 3"^/^ X 100 - 2iv£j=^s.p. IT o .% • * • M •••• • S m I • • t « • ■$ iiL ••• • HAPX'CQVER CALCUUTICn '.iGPXSHEET • • SETBACK zo!ic: (cii^cLH'ome) Q"75* ^75-25Cj^ 250-SC0' EcO-iOC3' ExisTiria H arcccv ;:^ im Zone y 2V;j5 9 * ••ft • S£J<5;Z '7 ?S S.r. Total Area m Zone 9 9r^S.p zr:>997^ X 100 - • • -t • I • * 7"Zi '92 LEfiGTH• • VCDTH X ' JO , 2-. /ZS'S.F. . • • • • • • «X . t • S.Fi• • . '— "-------- . • i •4 • • X _____ • S.F. • •X . •• • <•«• I* « $. Fi ****** ** ^ n. Gauas ? _ \x' /2.?_a 30<i • S.F. %• 1 » tfIPI • • • C. 0.71VEV/AY •. 1 33 0 S.F. • * X s m • s!f. • • • n. SinPWAt K A X ^ . •• •a 5Y0 S.P.* C^/xT. f', ^ r/7xv/*- rrfvr V 2.Z X „ _ • a 9 ^ So • t SiF. • c^A-/c'. c ^A k ’ * • t • X a TO f S.r. x' S-.^ tt • a • •• S.r.' /TV/ . . V. PS- e. AwnsrAPP >■ zr X ^ • •a //• S.F. AREAS underlaim BY ' •X • a • S.F. PLASTIC------------• • ; . sheet IMG • X • • « • S.F. C<!a ^c , diotfis t9 X Z « • 1 • X 2 • . • 7^. S.F. • A4tf9T»*ilt 2. 2-X 2.Z. X #5 / 9 S.F.• Tota' H ardcover A IN ZCNc Z3JO S.F.« _A I 2.3, % 1 • ■ • • h L HARC'CaVK CALCULATION HCCKSHH- SETBACK zone: (CIRC’,= CMS) 75-250 Ex :s7IN3 Karccover im Zone 25C-5G0' PROPOSED [ u iTi' \ ' • • m f • Total HAnccoven rrt Zc .me I • • Total Property Area i;i Zome • • A •. «• ■ House k • .. • K _•s •• « • L£:iGTH VaCTH • * •- X . • • • • •• • •. X • • * * •11•4k1Xt% vs •• . X • "• • •• • a s. • 1 %• Garags t• . X • c. •• • 1 Driveway • ft* • • • •. X • • 8 • • X .B • 0.. i • Sidewalk .* • m , X •• c 1ft • • • X ^8 f m • • •• * • • • • • X -• • E*^ATIO/ Deck ’• |t» M • • 1 X _ •••9m » •« a . F.Laud SCAPE • • ••X t •a AREAS UNDERUIM BY • ,X •• • FUSTIC------ • SHEETIflO • • X -a «• • • > •• • • • % X . • w G. Other • ••X • m • • 1 * s.?, S.F, • • $ • r • S.R, S.P. S.F. S.P. • S • FI S.F.* 5.P, S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. iiz£A..r. rs O't •T1_Z2l1£_ X 100 •% • (••• »m* *« • • • i • • HAPXCOVER CALCULATIQIl 'iiCRXSriEET Existing HAGCCCvEn in Zgng *• • • 3c,-zA. House X 2Y. ?5 LENGTH WIDTH /O.l. • t • • X ■. 1-X • • •* 3. Ga RAG c • • zv.o V ' V^.-O • c. D riveway 2l..0g,X . X • •• D.. SlDSWALX il^d£. CCajc. fj^£t X u X E.^,£AXio/ ;d!iS0>• • •• Z V /7V/J X F.Landscape —. areas UNDERLAIN BY ‘ I -------------- PUSTIC---------• SHEETING :____ X_______ X m • t • ^ X C^AyC, d<o(^tS jCd/4A< ^40 tr»*<k <5. X X 1 X • n « • Total H ardcover in Zone t Totai . Paopsrty A h !a tn Z«“S Z2.0 ' CP CP'*» ,OL“0*jJ ^v0"“•PPQ' • 775 S.F. . /Z3' • S.?. • • s. ?. • r • . S.P. •• • • • •• • S.9.1 1c/1•^ .fts.p. « • . s’.P. •• •S.Fi’ «• • S‘0 • ; Sip. m • mm • S.Pi •• • Wi • • •• m , €€. 5.F.' , // «es • S.Fi f • • S.F. • S.P. 1 ' • s 1 S.F. s It.m1loll). S.F. • ? 9 75 8, p, • • mSB 100 I ( • b y I •b I AlwCHO® CJ: 3 C tTP(CA c )H' ♦ M 12^TOP XAB ELryATlON^*^**UNEXCAVArED 4*G«A>VEL^5F w/ 4*CoA/C Si Afl W/bVfc^ro V WM f^(TYM ro® i.0CA.Ti0N \ € 4 i M flf'l-’b-N' • > I! \n. # TOi»/9CA» CUTV. AT 0Mf Ml. C* | Nott«4 <»*FO® POO® A0OW O ^ ' -r-yjB’'—=—= • • )Ikl.^/T«^*PM notch lc» - , - n > I-. ±—f------vrtL£».To'.«» 4*o' I ■b '>1 ' s y tf* ^ I M -If «4‘-o’5'-4‘^ 9*-/n nGARAC^E FLOOR4**COKlC. lu Kl Ki M. W/ TU^TSICD DOtMN FOOTVHA ^'T ePoCJk 04 •/«•# II TlMPOtA^r ro®M ttfAHtS |— fa ® A»MtHAC A awT te*CAnoVl €f 5-'I** Of #.«rV*o** !•«•- POAt ^ Soron ___ Cooctf FOUNDATION PLAN (formed ccrcrete) ALTERNATE TV/ SCAXA »/4**i*-o*CSCE ^OcnoN 4B) I. d A i-^4 WTKPnEiCIN® mmO% RCMove Foam 0oaad 5 APri® COMCHTTK »«T5 r•I« A — I my IF V > ^OTA* ^IKA E. CV^OUT UMOFH 1-IA.Wi. eV'O* ^'•o*I ^ AM 1*«B* 4^%Lf torttf jllr.:.Vn„ foundation plan (turned down tinb) SECTION 2A « c JfcwC |W»-, I*.#- „|ic,^Lr y4*AfVo^ dun 3CCT10M 4a 0 V V ^•iPHiAwcT ROOF PeS'GN LOADS ^ «b9. • L'V« UOi^O tp tb9 - OSAO LPAO «4.if» MCA.O 9^*9H „ ® o F-ny Ki'- MET-AU Roor ' V B>JT CCTT»0KIA44 T-ii 1 I' i‘»I ;1 !•' »i» • j [jiillL:,. .._. l'd. RIGHT SIDE ELEV. ^Nip it** Siksii 1 in tr IT .1...-U, ‘^Xa« A *0 T 14 i .*<1 P»4* CflFHX® •OARPA LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT FLEVATIOfj P-2026 SHEET 2 TOTAL 4 HibiA To:Mayor Callahan & Orono Councilmcmbers Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. Citv Administrator . From:Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building Zoning Administrator Date:May 13, 1993 Subject:#1826 Robert and Ann Henson. 2166 Shady wood Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential Total area = 18,843 s.f. (required = 21,780 s.f. or Vi acre) Applicants propose the installation of a 24' x 26’ garage addition at the street side of the>r residence. The strucnire meets all required setbacks. A new access drive will be installed and the entire remaining paved tennis court will be removed in addition to a shed and a ^ricked patio area at east side of court. The deck proposed at the lakeshore side of the house will result in additional hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area and will extend further into the lakeshore protected area an additional 6’ beyond the existing residence. The deck will encroach 25’ bevond the average lakeshore setback line. The following ordinances iire pertinent to tliis review; 1. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Lot is less than 1.99 acres in area. Lot coverage review is required. Total iot area = 18,843 s.f. Allowed = .2,826 s.f. or 15% Existing = 3,018.4 s.f. or 16% Proposed = 3,516.6 s.f. or 18.6% V'ariance = 690.6 s.f. or 3.6% Structural coverage has been increased 498.2 s.f. or 2.6%. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (A) - Lakeshore setback variance required for deck, Required = 75’ Existing ^^71’ 6" Proposed 66’ Variance =* 9’ or 12% 3. Section 10 22, Subd. 1 (B) - Average'lakeshore setback variance required for deck. Allowed = 0 Existing = 15’ Proposed = 25’ >r,'—. ----------- .............. .................................... .af .-.-■•-■tLiijij, r n Zoning File ?1826 Mav 13, 1993 Page 2 4. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. A.0-75’ setback area = 4,793 s.f. Allow'ed = 0 s.f. Existing = 96 s.f. or 2% Proposed =321 s.f. or 6.7% Hardcover increase = 225 s.f. or 4.7% B.75-250’ .setback area = 12,002 s.f. Allowed = 3,001 s.f. or 25% Existing = 10,095.3 s.f. or 84.11% Proposed = 5,744 s.f. or 47.86%* Hardcover reduction = 4,351.3 s.f. or 36.25% * Removals; Blacktop/tennis court = 4,736.8 s.f., brick pad — 111.7 s.f., shed = 125.8 s.f. .\dditions; 624 s.f. C.250-500’ setback area = 2,048 s.f. Allowed = 614.4 s.f. or 30% Existing = 1,865.3 s.f. or 91.08% Proposed = 1,669.3 s.f. or 81.51% List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Neighbors ’ Acknowledgement Form Hardcover Fact Sheets Survey/Site Plan Description of Request Applicant proposes the installation of a 24’ x 26’ attached garage addition to the street side of the house and a lakeside deck with doers at lakeside providing access to lakeshore. Current lakeshore access to house is at the w st side. The application did not include elevations of the proposed improvements so it is difficult to determine how garage is to oe attached to the principal structure at the deck that runs along the south side or street side of refidence. Staff shall ask the applicant to bring elevations to the meeting. I 7.ining FUe #1826 May 13, 1993 Page 3 The applicants propose a lakeside deck, the majority of which will be placed within the 75 ’ setback where no such encroachments are encouraged and few are allowed. As for the visual impact upon adjacent residences, they would appear to be minin.al. Because of the location of the principal structure in relation to house on the west side, the deck will not be visible from the view windows of the residence. The vegetation and plantings along the east side shall minimize impact of deck upon the views from principal structure on east side and from the deck. Applicants principal structure already is located well in front of the residences on both sides. Upon your site inspection, review the area where the driveway will enter the property at the county road. Note catch basin to the east that takes drainage from county road through culvert at the west side lot lin'*. Installation of the drive will involve alterations within the countv road that may impact the underground sto:n'-■»ater facility. Applicant has been advised to contact the Hennepin County Department of Transportation as a permit is required before work can commence within right-of-way. Applicant shall be asked to provide more detailed plans on any changes in elevation or any excavations within the underground tiled area. Staff cannot schedule the application before the Council until the county has signed off on the proposed improvement. Issues for Consideration 1.Can a lakeside deck be relocated on the property to minimize impact on 75 ’ setback area? Note 24’ exists between principal structure and cast lot line. A 3 ’ wide walkway could be provided from proposed doors at lakeside providing access to lakeshore deck within side yard. Walkway would not extend any further than the principal structure at the west side. The majority of deck hardcover would now be relocated within the 75- 250 ’ setback area. Are there other improvements on the property that could be considered for removal? 3.Lot co'vtiay-e on the property has been increased 2.6%. Applicant has proposed the removal 5 ’ x 24’ shed along the west lot line. The two garages create a coverage problem for the substandard property. Can any structures be reduced in area? Applicant should be asked to respond. 4.Excesses of hardcover e.xist within the 250-500 ’ setback area. Applicant proposes a 10% decrease. If the deck/patio area at so'hie 90 s.f. adjacent to existing garage along east and north side is increased, an additional 4.4% reduction of hardcover would be realized. Paved area at 1,120 s.f. is needed to provide access to and from garage. Ik. Zoning File #1826 May 13, 1993 Paue 4 Options of Action Any recommendation for approval must include the condition that all hardcover scheduled for removal must be completed at the time of the Building Inspector s footing inspection tor the new construction. Approval subject to conditions. Denial. Once again, please refer to Section 1.08, Subd. 3 (A) (1-12) for the necessary findings for denial. lifc -ft __ • ^ CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCli APPLICATION - ^ - Initial Application Fee $175.00 yyLi ($50.00 per each additior.al variance) // Renewal Variance Fee $100.OC (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address o V'- j/ (r r rrv r.rLi. I L' L »uitu r' f k’“iT i 'ZZ 2 7^^) * ________ ./ ui i)£.V T n ) 5b I- n <^3 litCEIPT-T^^Kj^..1 .V . } ----------------------------------------— rwjf »7.)f application if not ^?<.ivutv «.v . Property Identif. Humber (P Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired _ _ _ _ _ _ _(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent piarcels of land. Present use of property; bc residential _ _ _other(specify) Zoninq District:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ APPLICANT Name Phone (home) lc>lDe ^A A Phone (work) ^ Address; (c City; CO - - - Zip; 31/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Phone (heme) Phone (work) Address;City;Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: /Uj. -/h nXx^ (y^}j^(2i-65-W)- --y- -- - - - VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ Lot i'rea ^ Setback; JU-u^Q . _ Lot Width Front Side ^Hardcover_ _Lot Coverage Rear ^ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) •M» « « BLARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION of unusual PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submirted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered coppletc; i n 1 1. _Completed Application Fonn 2. _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8S"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8H'*xll''). 6. _ _S)cetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 6*<"xll''). 7. _ _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance applicatfcn is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional iaes (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses ii;curred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her )cnowledae. Applicant's Signature /!Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and ''•^uncil members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of this reqiAest Owner's Signature KJki KJ1, y - j- Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Appliqants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning CoBimission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE M/lVn BATCH 001 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OFWERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 1PRW> ADDR , 0»R4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADORPROP ADOR CMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR .PROP ADOR OHNER NA(«E TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 58 17-117-25 A2 000802184 SHAOYHOOO RO GEORGINA L HACKNEY GEORGINA L HACKNEY 2184 SHAOYHOOO ROAD (UYZATA MN 5554158 17-117-25 42 001102144 SHAOYNOOO RD A H I A F HENSON JR R08ERT r HENSON JR 2144 SHAOYHOOO ROAD HAY2ATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 42 0O21 05401 TOGO RO THOMAS L SMYOER THOMAS L SNVOER 5401 TOGO RO •, ORONO FM ’ 55541 t *I i » i . :*> •• ■ * K • • ■*% # f ; % ■■ i ^ PMP ADDR ONNCR NANC TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR f-’, 58 17-117-25 45 0154 02177' SHAOYHOOO RO HARK A SHEPHARD MARK A SHEPHARD ^ 2177 SHAOYHOOO RO .* HAYZATA m 55391 . . • 9 . ' r .. • * . ^ S i ** ^ ; « r" >r’.\ ^ '‘‘i^ ^ 9 I “V. : • -Vv%y.: ' t i: '». ,r I 1» ^-ii •: ■ 0 1. * . t . --i' ■,fr * '•/ y •' *' it- . . .. 58 17-117-25 42 000902178 SHAOYHOOO RO C t S ANDERSON CURTIS ANDERSON 2178 SHAOYNOOO ROAD HAYZATA MN 5559158 17-117-25 42 001202142 SHAOYHOOO RO R C I H A MER'O PAUL C « mart;A A MERLO 2142 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 42 0022 02171 SHAOYYOOO RO JACQUELYN A R08ERT50»» JACQUELYN A ROBERTSON 2171 SHAOYHOOO ROAD HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0157 02189 SHAOYNOOO RO ROBERT J LATIMER ROBERT J LATIMER 2189 SHAOYNOOO RD HAYZATA HN 55591 r; 58 17-117-25 42 001002172 SHADT'HOOO RO N H > G R HELCH NORMAN N HELCH 2172 SHADY HOOO RO HAYZATA MN 5559158 17-117-25 42 001502158 SHAOYNOOO RO JEROME J LAGUE I HIFE JEROME J LAGUE 2158 SHADY HOOO RD HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0155 02195 SHAOYHOOO RO JOHN H ANDERSON JOHN H ANDERSON 2195 SHAOYHOOO RO HAYZATA MN 5559). • ♦ * ’t ■ I TOTAL BATCH ' • OOl 00011 ' Vr.‘* • * '• •< • . S'. . ..*. I • • ^ • » 'I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INTORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEFtTEPIN COUNTY OEPARTJIENX. OF PROPEI^^TAXATION► TO..WE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF^ / / *\ ft ‘ I *k^ , ( A • ■ (rr. A ‘ ' f ** * * *»• *** ^ * ^ *♦/ . f 'I 0 • ^ . V % ftl ••I ! *4 \' *. •, »« J * * • ■ V T‘ ( 0)r i. 4 t V( -• ■f. I »( .i- *■V. Ad -A igur ^ ft \\i-l , •t !f., i i i‘- s' i '<*0 o .*'1-!•tP;. O 4' L- i ^ ' C rc *^irvl-o; t*v ^ i2. : • »Kf ji A. I . 1 A • !•> f • «)(6.1i ifii )AU >n L>*^ 1k' X oL «cs OC ‘ /' » -■3) #(^9;lt9)ir9)"r -6 1C - 9 *•!/• 'v 1 .». )\[ij Ni/Z > i-i I- * !.»< M Lii- V, * 1 vk * 1 Ik1. 1 9 ■'! \.J- .'•r !)i 1 l« ) J^ i "X Xiir, ■‘' i L i ‘ 4 ■ - 1 i ^ &’■fit w»b «.«' 0 5»>(9t)lu»)I8t) i*U.‘1r.kA i-xr j» nc rt- ' TT • ^\ X :i 0 ii i )r \ 6'L £i- V C' dt " ot ] « K‘ii" i-'i ^ W««'. >>** ■••rr* ^ • *. * r# . -H >!'£i Li '(& Lw K (S (8)I(6)(Ol ) (“ > ::e (^|) (^t) (j») ?Z [TT 0& vor)I9ti ) X 0 •>i _9ir I la^Dkce) ii DC (t :3" fil • I . «■t > —.. > • ^ ^ -i ’ 1 ' viOMva § yyf • ,77 ;■) /«(rn )a y»- / / ‘An < *7 ‘»! A /-N / t ► u i / • I 7 X*.ll / eTTT ''•-A’ V!':%rr' ‘" %~r!^ I L/> 50st. / ^ / / ....... 1 .. •'*t •. ■ <L / *|Dli if'U HOilAnns ain TOD rl^ 3^ DSIn i£i « 3IS t: iCD 4ftj INCIilii'* |rn I V'l i^IlO jO kBfd <C HCiirOfA MOi njD» j»«nr«fN S.*3iU 'lion ^i>4 7 “7M: v#'“v^X — •• '0'*^ ‘ .-* •• •?\. 69fir ® ■'‘'JSXM r^, O' O ( •■ 9 C_ **-.v7' • »■ , . > ■%—••• - »•%) <} Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement For-n , teL -^1' i.CTT-''~> of ‘^:shl'lhI {we) l*e^‘-afc >f\ef/-,o-.','.*.-' 'orint nanie(S/' ][orint adcresis, have reviewed the plans for the proposed , imorovement property located at "'kHs, .'rf r' also r Application No. or proposed use of the sferred to as Land «Jse / ^ Cff-cnr^ that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am , / 'r^J^ed to declare^ or disapproval of the property or use(are) not asked to declare p council that I (we) am (are) aware of th:rm;roLl:nrpVans'and%^at the proposed neighbcr*s project or use 3T0cjuir6S Council approval. Property Owner rate Pr^pefty Owner X. Mye u.euch- « [print name(s)] have reviewedjhe Application j in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) amI (we) understand that in execuco. y nrooertY or use (are) not as)ced y °o^ I (we) am (ate) aware of the rmrrove;:nTpl^Ts^°nd\\%t\L proposed neighbor's project or use recjuiras Council approval* hi Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any “u “comments'^to^"the^Building t ttifn^Office arieaTt 10 days prior to the scheduled ^meeting date. u*( ...,< f 4 ^J J * . * \ P ^ V. //<^A/r5^A/ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (^^7^ 75-250' 250-500' 500-10C0 Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH B. Garage c. Driveway 0. Sidewalk h O / / 4.S F. Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY , . PLASTIC sheeting G. Other 3Z^S.F. WIDTH X X / / 3e.s /.<5 2. o X X X , ? .• s .• / . S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone* Total P roperty Area in Zone ^793 9C !> S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. \ \ or—:—;.S IV* ^ ^ ' S.F. • i A •: S.F. S.F, S.F,Q3 47 93 S.F. S.F. 1 b ] 9C. 3Zt B X 100 2. oo \oy y'O loo 3 70 4-2.l-^7y Hi^.RDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (jS-2S^ 250-500' 5G0-IQG0' E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH /5.-^ 3.2. 2. ^jMuae-6-Z c. wivewAi' ^•3 0. 3> ^9 E.D.TIO/ )£CK F.UvHOOeAPg _ AREAS UNDERLAIN BY , __ PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other 7.5 - X . X X X X X z^,<^ WIDTH X 5Z.^ 7.1 /C.d ^3. (9 51 C7 44..1 ft . .• -J3j-£—. s .f ^ _73S.a> s.P. ^32z.3 ... \zn^.s S.F. S.F, U3.B S.F iSJ S.F ^ = /4,4 2^5.5 S.F. S.F. Zlt iff S.F. in.7 S.F. 17^.4^S.F. 7/B^ ■ O S.F. 7.S S.F. S.F. S.F. 43.5 S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Tctal Property Area in Zone /IGOZ. /C^a95.3 S.F. /Z. Z s.p.E X 100 m ■l^ifdctvGir Ito ^24- , ^ 11 7 .“f #•/,<-/» !i ^ p ncoz 47. S6. Vo CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ROBERT & ANN HENSON LOTS 19&20. BLOCK 1. WILEY'S PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA L£GAl OCSLKjPTIOfI Of PWEmsfS SURvgyCD; Thai part o* li'i 19, Block I, lying NorthMustor I» j* 4 I'ne drawn i.S'uugh s*id lut parallel wiiii ihe bouih. easterly line of said lot and 12.b feel Northwester Iy therefrom. AND ALSO the Southeisterly half. f*-oni and rear, of tot 20. Block I. all In Wiley’s Park, take ilinnt !«.nka (for purposes of this survey the Northwest erly line of the Southeasterly half, front and rear, of Lot 20 Ixis linen assumed to be a line drawn from the midputni of the SuuihwestcrIy line of said Lot 20 Northeaster Iy through the aldpoint of the dashed lakeshore traverse line as shown on the plat). This Survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, garage, and shed thereon, and the location of all existing visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to Show any other Inproveoents or encroachments. o : Iron narker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. I4*41MUJBV l«AH\ If lUlt IW-AkiriHW, ___ COmN k GRQNBFRf.. INC. jjwJ bite i'ltiiiun f.im.u.uk Au-mu’ • lon^ Likr, MN 51^356 i i I Tntiln tiilili lh,»l lht*v(irt,( .1 tiw i<f t nn Jifr*I v4i|Vf f ,iml )litl l.'midult ficiMrmlt lul Inci'wiv jhwII jndSjninnundtf llw* bn* i4 IIm' Sljlr *4 \|irn«"«i<j kbit *• I Hm«r NiimKv Ijrss •4 All I lull 4. /5-9J 93 Ml f. >41 TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:May 12, 1993 SUBJECT: #1827 Richard Uenr> Nelson, 3908 Cherr> A^'enue - Variances - Public Hearing The applicant proposes installation of a new roof that would be at a higher pitch than existing ro<)f. Installation of the new roof requires variance approval as the entire structure is located in front of the average lakeshore setback line and involves an expansion of the building envelope. Half of the residence is located within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area, approximately 54' from the shoreline. Applicant proposes an expansion of the structure along the south side involving a deck with roof supported by post/beam, die majority of which will be located over a non-hardcover surface. The addition is located within the 75-250 setback area and located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The applicant has otfered no hardcover removals where excesses exist. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Lot coverage is reviewed as follows: Total lot area = 23,220 s.f. Allowed = 3,483 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 2,524 s.f. or 10.8% 2.Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback variance Complete struemre is located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. 3.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover inventory 0 75’ setback area = 6,990 s.f. Allowed = 0 Existing = 2,960 s.f. or 42.35% No hardcover increases proposed 75-250’ setback area = 16,230 s.f. Allowed = 4,057.5 s.f. or 25% Existing = 3,158 s.f. or 19.46% Proposed = 3,425 s.f. or 21.1% Hardcover increase of 267 s.f. or 1.6% • Zoning File /^1827 >*ay 12, i?93 Pane 2 ♦Includes 247 s.f. of roofed deck addition and 6" of overhang. P/2* overhangs are not considered encroachments and are not included within hardcover inventory. If overhang e.xceeds I'/i’, the portion of the overhang that e.xceeds is added into hardcover area. Applicant proposes a 2' overhang. Note overhang along west, north and east side of residence has not been included because it will be installed over existing hardcover. Total hardcover on property = 6,385 s.f. or 27.4% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Hardcover Fact Sheets E - Survey F - Building Sections G - Floor Plan H - Elevations Description of Request The installation of the new roof requires variance approval as the improvement involves an expansion of the building envelope of .■ structure located in front of the average lakeshore setback line and ponions of structure are located in lakeshore protected area. The addition to tlie south side of the residence also involves an expansion of the existing building envelope located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The structural addition meets all other required setbacks and does involve an addition of approximately 267 s.f. of hardcover. In addition to the installation of a new roof, the applicant proposes the replacement of windows which will not an involve an expansion ot the building envelope. As ready noted, the applicant has not offered removals of hardcover as the proposed addition is located within the 75-250’ setback area where no excess exists. Upon your site inspection, note the proposed structural improvements within the average lakeshore area will have minimal impact on lakeshore views of the adjacent residences on either side. On die east side there is a 60’ lakeshbre access where adjacent neighbors have either provided natural screening or fencing providing a buffer from public lake access and to the west the higher elevador-i and natural plantings along the west side minimize impact on view- windows. Zoning File ^1827 May 12. 1993 Pase 3 Issues for Consideration Although the proposed addition is located i>ut of the 75 ‘ setback area and docs not involve hardcover variances within the 75-250 ’ zone, should applicant offer a matching reiTunal within the 0-75 ’ setback area at a tninimum 267 s.f. - - or other removals? Statement of Hardship Refer to Exhibit A. applicant notes need to repair roof because of water problems. New design will help provide positive drainage off roof. Review west elevation, the existing residence Joes not have a main entrance at the street side. The roofed deck will define new entrance and also provide cover from elements. Staff would add house was originally used as a seasonal cabin and constructed prior to current zoning standards. Options of Action Approval as proposed; Approval subject to conditions; or Denial. Refer to Section 10.08, Subd. 3 (A) 1-12 for necessary findings n ( CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION /I Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per eacn additional varianc^^ Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 0 S //7 ^ a Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired / . /*7.g' ^_ _ _(mcnth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land Present use of property; L— residentxal r rrv rr Ur.i I I U*l nccrrc I A itmTc V. w » » 1 W4- i * * j r I A VVV ni n\i trsr r V 1 CUf. i ; :»• V / iicrv* ^ fLfivwA lu other {svecifv)*0U-----------nnTTTifc^iT i )i II / -• I » , . ff«L I VWUV/ kvV'X l\V«Zoning District_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICANT Phone (home) Name V^_ _ _ _ _ Phone (wor)c) 1^.21- Address; 5?- _______ City; 0/?e^^fc>------------ Zip; a-iriLiuiL Limn uppweu nt) . 0^u.'i Id.'Cx^ Name P .s./ C /V U ! C.. € . V, /wT Phone (home) Phone (wor)c) Address; / ‘3'- 1 City; _ _ _ _Zip; 4^ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ *3 0. Po 0^0^ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRET Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage ^ Setbac)c; VC Front _ _Other (specify)_ _ _ Side Rear Average Lakeshore HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zonirm Code requirements;_------------ ^/4 S' ) (Ro>CiX c—C: “P Vv t 4- 'V i C; (at*-ach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete; 1. _Completed Application Form 2. _ _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. _Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j"xll" for reproduction). 5. _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. _ _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8^"xll"). 7. _As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above Information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and corre^ f^o ,the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date / - 9J OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend c» scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE OA/20/93C \BATCH OOS \5» 08-117-25 55 0017LPROP ADDR OWO CHERRY PLOHNER NAHE RONALD L GLESNE ETAL TAXPAYER RONALD L GLESNE NAHE/ADDR 1*70 CHERRY PL C MOUND MN 5556* L- :I 58 08-117-23 53 0020 PROP ADDR ■ 05*08 CHERRY AVE DHriER NAHE RICHARD H NELSON TAXPAYER RICHARD h NELSON NAHE/ADDR 5*08 CHERRY AVE V...HOUND HN 'w PROP ADDR # 58 08-117-25 55 0063 01525 MlTtUE AVE ONNER NAHE STANLEY J TIBBETTS C TAXPAYER STANLEY J TIBBETTS NAHE/ADDR 1525 H1I84IE AVE HOUND HN 55364 L. PROP ADDR 3B 08-117-23 33 0086 05925 CHERRY AVE OHNER NAHE ' RUSSELL 0 PEHLE ET AL TAXPAYER RUSSELL D PEHLE NAHE/ADDR 5925 CHERRY AVE •HOUND MN 55364 ■ ft • ft « t» • it ,•. V.. • • . 4 ii t§■0' * ♦ ' • »^ , 1 ■ Jb' •1* ♦ •i • * * ft 1 1 4 •Ml t • % _t 1 • s $ j :! • 1 * • k * « ft HEWSPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»«CRS LIST REPORT MO. PXA55401PAGE 1036 Oa-117-23 33 OOlS03^28 CMTRRY AV£DONALD R O'REILLY A HIFE DONALD R O'REILLY 3928 CHERRY AV HOUND MN 5S36<» 38 08-117-25 53 00190392A CHERRY AVE ALDEN J PURVEY ETAL ALDEN J PURVEY 392i CHERRY AVE HOUND NN S53A4 ' I> A . >. J ‘«f' »r .-^'V 58 08-117-25 55 0027 05T07 CHERRY AVE F REINHARDT ETAL F REINHARDT 5W7 CHERRY AVE MOUND 555AA 58 08-117-25 55 0028 01520 MINNIE AVE MARK »t1 JENSEN ETAL HARK H JENSEN 1520 MimiE AVE MOUND HN 555AA I •»>. t» I ) 58 08-117-25 55 008* 0586* CHERRY AVE REIWETH C • VERNA E NEEKS KENNETH C A VERNA E »CEKS 586* CHERRY AVE MOUND m 555(>* V » 56 08-117-25 55 0085 058*8 CHERRY AVE 8 O FELDMAN A 8 A FELDHAN 8 O FELDHAN ABA FELDMAN 56*8 CHERRY AVE NXffO 5556* • .. .mV # r- V1vV • ». V-.V • 73SSi •t 38 08-117-23 33 00n7 03883 CHERRY AVE PAUL E I HARY J TAYLOR PAUL TAYLOR 38P3 CHERRY AVE HOUND HN 5536^ i.ir TOTAL BATCH ‘t A*N -------- 'r '••7% '; ;; 003 ooou ^ ■■■ ‘ • i. f * * 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE MM TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. . ^ I I - .A . ;r f. ■; » * » • • ; ‘ . t ? 't . *‘ * 1«•. » . • .• i • . I- DATE . .,s| V I S *8*W • * w CL 5? ^ 4 ^ ^ -i Hit 81S ,6 *0 5 7 I** I t ■ tr (0 14* s: 4 ’ %'S (7Z) ? (T!) • (70 i" S-r^TTi^: 9t : f T5T ( :5) 2m‘ f 9 1^ r: " -► 1 ^ A £\Y\T Ij' '19 V) -\ :\ :?:__:-A4,\^■l r ■. n • \^ {26; :i7 • \ ^ ar # JVr ^ *>4? 1?. n ‘ro 1 5 • ' ^ jm^ • 9- jf_ - (7j.:' ^ . 'Si..' ‘*ir- issT w s .«? ..(75)*'• ?? m. S 15- ? • 5B .’■! ' ^ ' (63' S 44 s 1? -SR. 25^’' 0 s 4 ’*4> 44 n ? F c; J 1 53 ?7 ( '5 •' K 5=* ‘-'v,•9^ 44 33 p * '6 ^ S . ? 'iC 29 PS 0 - ve M r ^ ? ^ >5 - ' 7.:r- s i ($^ ' M ' 65 •: ? -.4 c s ‘73^ ^ : 3 - B i % X 44 :: ? ! 1 6&.66 X X X 1 ' X 1 (Til i » ! 11 ! :: ! 1 1 ' -■9W 7. , ’ % # |\ ^ • 1 1§ :69) "§! '®§ (55)t /...' 1 ® s !(6T', ,-r t \ 7^- ae L 1 1 'X ' X ' 7 11 ^v.y t \ i20/'^ I M- • - , L i '6 , :;* •• / JcTa?'J, J t! ^' ; CZ9) ... a 30 r#4^ (3?:s 11 .33^ -fC H 1 > 'SC • I? (35' It.- r ^5.il;5)/(7\'.-fi-,' / 'f ‘ S / ; / 7 / rl,-5s/ / I t^] ' j'i I S' I I «> ' ts S- ! ' f I Sfi •'•• J£ si «. ^jERRT^^'’ —» ^ «. sr /V!;.;-. / i ^ - i? «'/ _ ' *W <N, I V I 'i AVE <r r ;5"' ; lO'i' - i e. ,1? /...;• ':-i: ‘"3).t42)i^4i)M0)!^ :,,9,5(33)S| • . g I • ^ “ pi -f; -. , , 1 : —. —■ ^ ^ ^ * i ' fry < ... »* 1-y^ k;, -'.a..,' ‘'■O -V V ^ ’ Zi... —* I i! X .SC X X ^...f '5 I '«si K Si ?! 8 22 s' :"5 S, 2* d 2^ gi 2S gj 2? |i 2! S 2 ■(50) ils:) (rj'is)|'i5; <»)(r)i (; 5l ! X i>j ^..*, «-C it-'‘-9'i-' ____ I ! 5 ' §! '■? J5)i '■‘51 i ' i! i ' . K V y V V y y _ _5:V I • • X -4 Thcjah 19,. e->c era :x.mm 1 v*:(s: • .th • » ♦ •, IC- ^ c •«■• —^' — «» ' O’! (■) «33 8 ■; (o; jC33!i *c ’ «- v3) «. (2^ 7;4 15 «£2* GOVT LOT 5 ;9I6.00 =£i . legally recorded map. it kr t\ ^ U5 J2 14:40 lAA Oli 4.'0,ou(i-AA\.UUf\ '>>. iLAilri7 /i/ec.^^ 4- * * •» rl^-lDCOVER CALO jUTION HORKSHFT-T SETBACK zcNC: (ciKCLS CNS) ^^75^ 75-25-j' 250-5G0' Ex ISTIN iS KAitDCOVER IN ZCNE SCO - IQOO' A/-% •House 740 ULNG7H WIBTH , O^ C9 r» S.F. S. r • X s.=. X SI F. t. uARAGc S.F. C. DRIVrrfAY X c r* «• X • ^ c D. S idewalk ■/« >: S rr 48-.c c « _X :» - X 7S7 -• S P-E. Patio / Deck • X 2X , • S. P. F. Landscape X ^a 8/A S. P- BY X 2J5 S.F.PLASTIC SHEETING X • • • •* ** • S.F. Wp®oT/a#A«^ • 9l U.P. X • ,•• S.F. 'Zoc,^ LU/^CL G. Other • JT X . //7 S.F, V.• Total Hanccoveh in Zone * -ZT^o\ • S.F. • • • • # , Total Property A rea in Zcnr ^ S.F. \ Bj Z?€^o f9o X 100 = 4^^.3 5 «% Him ii jtilifttlflM IW 7 fir RARDCaVcR CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZCNE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' Existing HARCcavsR in Zone A. Hcuse u LEXcrH fz.z. ^Ic'P/rp ' ^ Z‘ ^ •»ot>psTej^ 3. €?tftWS __ c. Driv ^iay \u0kLU i D. SlEcn'ALK i?*8 Cmc~5tcp^ Oeck 4. • 7 Conc^ htj apf^ F.LANDSCAPE AREAS UNDERLAINWINJEOW weus 5Y PLASTIC SHEETING C.tjrh zrr £ier/as G. Other m X X X width X ___ 5* ^ ^4-' 57 ^.4 / Total Hardcover in ZoNsf • - • •• r . . ^ Total Pr'o'pmty A rea :m Zonc 1(77.1,03/5-8' ^ W* A * « * D " 4^' 250-500' 15G0-10GQ' a *S.F. - /4?..S.F. = /7^_ _ S * r . A* .S.F. - 7 S.F. .S.F. . ''575 S.Ft //^ • S.F. 33 S.F. ‘ S.F. . ^7 S.F. • #«■.S.F. :S.F. B S.F. 9 ‘ • . S.F. 9 73’.:^.S.F. Ill S.F. 3/.S8:. • S.F.A IhZ^cf S«P.bI • r inn » /^' :% n i ! UGAL DESC7!P7tOM OF Ptl.h^StS SU<»VFTFO- lots 'A and 15. Block 4. CRySML BAY VIEW. ® : Deletes Iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. Rl \tsii «v n\ii n•^4 ^ .. . .---- Coffin & ciinynFiir: imc. ( -.f I '' : I -/4y ‘ • ■ ■' 'J ' I'Ll, "!.• I !!II r I m } ^ t • r I f I U T f4r^ VBKVF^-eHoiHeegw? m O:^\kjpo^y/ ^omrv^/ 4)^4»nw. ^ t1w» f2?st rre.'-— I !• u L &BuiLPtNCi Becnchi !5Hl>.'* •*^ • A-'. ». * •, *. Jjj / **;/ iV.-'v' !•;*•* **'• * *i‘‘^**.. ‘ •/» i ;• ‘I V ■i K ri 'h !• i ViT.-i'.r?. •?TVr I l*■'ltM^* * -* «A \A (Vi Hi s 4 (K 'i- U" V I Ctl 5; »!w %v^ 55 TO;Planning Commission Members Ron Mex^rse. City Administrator FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE;May 13. 1993 SUBJECT: ir 1828 Christopher and Erin Tully, 1355 Nonh Arm Drive Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IB Lakeshore Residential requiring 1 acre in area Total area = 75,050 s.f. or 1.7 acres Applicants seek approval of a conditional use permit for an accessory structure to be located on a through lot defined at the rear by an undeveloped spur road of Park Drive and at the front street lot line by North Arm Drive. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: 1 Section 10.03, Subd. 10 - Conditional use permit required for all accessory structures on through lots located in residential districts. Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (E) - Accessory struemres in excess of 750 s.f. but not e.xceeding 1,000 s.f. shall be located 15’ from lot line. The structure area is at 983.7 s.f Applicant proposes 17’ side setback. 3.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (A) - No accessory building or structure shall be constructed on lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory'. 4.Section 10.22. Subd. 2 - Hardcover within 500-1,000’ setback area of Lake Minnetonka. Total area = 75.050 s.f. Allowed — 22,515 s.f. or 30^^ Existing = 3,609 s.f. or 4.8% Proposed = 4,592.7 s.f. or 6.1% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Hardcover Fact Sheet E - Floor Plan, Section, Elevations F - Existing Survey G - Proposed Survey i Zoning File #1828 May 13, 1993 Page 2 Applicants seek approval of a conditional use permit to allow installation of 29.9 x 32.9 accessory structure to be located in the street/rear yard of through lot. The through lot consists of three separate parcels, combined Ia)Is 11 + 12 + 13, 14. and combined Lots 21 + 22 + 23. The residence structure is Uxated on combined Lots 11, 12 and 13. A permit for an accessory structure cannot be issued because as currently defined the accessory structure could not achieve credit of the principal structure on combined Lots 11 + 12 + 13. Applicants must combine all three parcels prior to the City issuing a permit for the new construction. Access to the structure shall be through an extension of the driveway to the rear. The 983.7 structure will meet the required 15’ setback and will be approximately 108’ from the rear/street lot line. Accessory structures to be placed in rear yards of through lots must meet the required front/street setback of the zoning district. The LR-IB zoning district requires a 35’ street setback. The new owners are in the process of a major cleanup of the p»operty. The original storage structure at 1,000+ s.f. in area was demolished via a control bum approximately three weeks ago. Members will note the ashes that still remain on the property from that bum. The proposed structure will be located approximately within the footprint ot the former structure. Refer to Exhibits F and G. State Recommendation To approve a conditional use permit for Erin and Christopher Tully for the property located at 1355 North Arm Drive to allow construction of an accessory structure at 29.9 x 32.9 . • .. _________i ;aftrklvino frsr fh#» lpCT!l1 located at Hjj iNonn Arm unve lo auuw cuimiuuuuu au to be placed in the street/rear yard of the through lot subject to applicant applying for the legal combination of the three independent parcels prior to the City issuing a building permit for the accessory structure. lAiUMiaai m > ■ i n i i i - OP ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION 4^ .JERTY LOCATION site Address _ _ _ _ _ Property identification Number ( H ' —-t Ki Please attach legal description to applica cn required survey. 07 - \ n ' Jh SI 'CL' 7^ icaticn if not included applicant Name Address f Phone (home) Phone (work)^IX ■ V^n.AC 0. City Qc-^O_ _Zip^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (home) Phone Address Citv Zip g7Lr°grn^tnrsrcw n t.e .d^acent PEES - CONDITIONAL DSE PERMITS - $ 50,00 For each variance request with CUP application ' „ CITY OF OFuiriQ_______ $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use WXi'o' — - . Fif^^^CO OFFICE iCi-jCOOCOO Oi CEN - ^ . __ ri 1 •LhtLS Ti r A«.w/a V fitaiPT-THM YOU ff270730 cool POl 715 04/23 $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. , - lakeshor©Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakesnore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation . Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD - refsr to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule 'RESENT USE CF PROPERTY Present Zcnino District Present Use of Frorcrty _ _ _ Residential Other (specify) description op request Describe request in detail: A Uc V ,f I ,N.» fv> t I 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Fonr., Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (ycu can obta; this list from Henneoin County Department of Finance A-603 Governme- Center 2^5-3271). Plat Map, Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. you ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (ll* X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the/ljest of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature 3I Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification o^th4.s request. Owner's signature 0\Date v/ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Offxce of this change prior to the meeting. you can obtai >03 Governmer ts). ■ate list of OR LtTTED. n. Please rmatlon has 5 complete. squired or 'ees (staff s incurred n supplied d further »sultants, poses of efore the Ld on the cheduled Licant is ' have an & Zoning V •RUN DATE 0A/20/9S BATCH OOS r'COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»tlERS LIST REPORT NO. PXAIS^ul' PAGE UPROP AOOR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 56 07-117-25 A1 OOM01541 NORTH ARH OR GEORGE P GATE GEORGE P GATE 1541 NORTH ARH OR HOUNO IM 55544 58 07-117-25 41 00670155S NORTH ARM DR C TULLY A E CHALGREM C TULLY A E CHALGREN 1555 NORTH ARH OR HOUNO HN 55544 58 07-117-25 41 004800058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C TULLY A E CHALGREN C TULLY A E CHALGREN 1555 NORTH ARH DR HOUNO rt< 55544 I ^ ► «* .4 f PROP AOOR 0»8CR NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 07-117-25 41 0044 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNFO VINCENT JOHNSON VINCENT JOHNSON 8104 HIGHNOOO OR UNIT Y118 BLOOHINGTON WE 55458 58 07-117-25 41 0070 01574 PARK OR 0 r LARSON A T K LARSON DAYTON F A TERESA K LARSON 1574 PARK DR MOUND MN 55544 58 07-117-25 41 0071 01388 PARK DR MAG RASMUS MAG RASMUS 1588 PARK DR HOUNO Wl 55544 . Y PROP AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 58 07-117-25 41 0072 01540 PARK DR HAYNE H HOLMES NAYNE H HOLMES 1540 PARK OR MOUND WE 55544 m « f - • 58 07-117-25 «.l 0075 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C TULLY A E CHAlCREN C TULLY A E CHALGREN 1555 NORTH ARM OR HOUNO WE 55544 58 07-117-25 41 0075 00058 ADDRESS UNASSISXD JAMES LANG A ARDIS NIEMANN AROTS M NIEMANN NOONAN 544 N OHASSO BLVO ST PAUL MN ' 55124 > r ■ V ;•p PROP RDDR I QltCR NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH ' NAME/ADOR 005 00009 ♦.' • I' ■ f:/- ft-5. :k :')r 'TA'-. . ti ,>t*‘ * ’f ‘t 1 A- 0 -• . 't -U •V •. • "• -.k4a I* .vV». - 'r, •48 JP' 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEWEEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEOGE ANO BELIEF., DATE '; 4 f- 4* ♦ .» i' ■ V '*4* . 4j *y . y • .V. -4 k ^ n ♦v < I . > ^ A > > E- *E • U ;: > • ♦ . .■ 5 : V A o:r, p \V ' 8 r • • ••n HARDCOVER CALCuLATICfi KORKSHEEi SETBACK ZCNE: (CIRCLE cne ) C~7E' 75-23 E xisting Hardcover in Zone 1. Mr;!'?- X 0' 25C-SCC(^^G = 10?fi :-:cco S.F, LENGTH WIDTH X a S.F. X S.F. X S.F. X S.F. S.F. r rioTVcwAV X . noo S.F. X S.F. S.F. X a S.F. X • a S.F. E. Patio/ Deck X ». --S.F. e X a S.F. ' S• •• « • w UNDERLAIN nv X >S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X 8 • S.F. X 8 S.F. S.F. a s Total Hardcover in Zone 3G(^!”'S.F. Total Property Area in Zone ~7 Knso S.F. A SGcy 4 R . X 300 - . • A B % 0 A Q Q .• * • i CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FORI ♦ • ; CHRIS TULLEY IN BLOCK 13. SAGA HILL REVIS^ ! HENNEPIN COUNTY?W nNESOt X^ • U ‘M. r. « «f. ’’ f '* VV f-m Y • ' »:v^v . • <?* •*•' Av> -*• i^vv ; ‘ti 't v*f; t'.r-7>^ >'•-"■ *rr — .,'■ . •*. t«.. » . *1 ■ ^ ■ *.-. , , I? ■• V. IWI-I ti-. >. ^ ' • •• ■«> (R) .•r--T r.- ■ './' lEGAl DESCRIPTION OF PREMISCS SURVEYED: Lots 11. 12. 13. 14. 21. 22 and 23. Block 13. -Saga HMl Revlsad, Hennepin Co Minn.- • : Iron marker found 0 : Iron marker set Bearings snown are based upon an assumed datum. ^'r# M fX, 0B* tff. ^0. ocacNisaT SHAWN IT MVKION DATS wsounioN 1 .♦ » f ' COFFIN & GRONBFRC. I\T. CrMv<(/^>iy /./If,/ >,.v is2 I.mut.uk Avrmii- • l.oinj iTk^^ M\ M’47.V4lt| ' I hrrrby ftftily iKii ihJ» uinry wit pfrpmJ by ma of umJff my diml wper- vidon, and Ihil I am a duU rr{itl<TrJ Ci*U Enjinrtr and l^nj SwrvTyur undff • Ihe laws oi the Suta oi KtmnatoU Marks. OonhaijMlnneiotaUcmiaNumbaf i:;35 ^ XTAU UATl 4-/ -9) UMNO. ^yi57 • * I V / cy ^A' t ;• • •* J: f* I I cSyv5 X ' ^^7 " // ^y<y' s^V /> vy O’ *,'^0'' v° 6^ ,0