Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-16-1993 Planning Packet
MINUTES OF iHE OROHO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 16. 1993 ROLL Th« Orono Planning Cqi!I!i i s a I on mat on tna abova date Hith the following aambtra present: Acting Planning Coeasltalon Chair Hauraan Baltowa, Charlaa Schroadar, Candaca Rowlatta, Jaff Johnson and Ed Cohan. Cohan laft the neeting at 9:15 p.m. Stephan Peterson Nas absent. The following represented the City Staff: Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, and Septic Manager Stephen Wecknan. Council mambara Qabrial Jabbour and J. DIann Qoattan eera present. Chair Bellows called the moating to order at 7:00 p.m. (•1) 61798 FRED • BARBARA RYAN. 134S north arm drive - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:10 P.M. The Af f Idavl t of PubI I cat ion and Cart I f I cate of Mailing w^ra noted. Mr. and Mrs. Ryan ware present for the application. Mabusth reviewed an earlier application involving a petition to vacate portions of Forest Boulevard. The application was tabled until access to the Q. Nelson property and easements to City sewer lines within a previously vacated road known as Oak Place are resolved. Mabusth indicated this issue will now be handled through the City Attorney. Staff recommends continuing the review of the Ryan’s Individual request to vacate, and will continue the review of the original 19BB petition to vacated excluding the Johnson and Nelson properties. Mr. Ryan stated they are in the process of selling their home and would like to clear up the issue prior to that. Richard Johnson. 1304 Elmwood, was present with general comments. Bellows suggested he return when the entire issue is to be reviewed and state his comments then. Schroeder asked for clarification of the Issue. J minutes CF the 0fK»«0 PtANMINQ COmiSSION MEETING HELD FEBRUAflY 16, 1093 Z(»IINQ FILE §1798 - CCWT. Nat>u»th •xplainad onct tn« City v«c«t*d th« ar«« adjacent to Foraat Laka Boulovard. tha naxt atap «K>uld be to vacate the ''emalning •• tl'e City had no Intaraat In tha proparty. Bacauaa of tha uniQua ownarship of propartlat In tha araa. individuala lautt ««orH directly with tha City to fila tha appropnata documanta In tha chain of title for thair proparty. During tha review of tha firat vacation applicatton. Hr. NaIaon provided a written latter Quaationing whan the City would raaolva tha accaaa problaai raaulting from an earlier vacation of Oak Place that landlocked hia proparty. It was the Planning Cotnmiaaion * a racomraandation during tha aacond vacation application of Foraat Boulevard to defer tha matter until tha City could raaolva tha Nalaon’a dlltfnma. Schroadar clarified that thia vacation request will not affect tha Nelson's position. Habuath concurred. It was moved by Schroadar. seconded by Cohan, to racoaaaand approval of Application aiTga for Fred and Barbara Ryan, 1345 North Arm Drive, for tha vacation of dedicated road, Foraat Boulevard. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•2) #1600 MICHAEL PLANK, 4115/4145 VATERTONN ROAD - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 7:40 - 7:48 P.M. The Aft (day 11 of PubI icat ion and Cart i f Icate of Mailing ware noted. Mark Qronbarg was present Hackman explained tha applicant la requesting & lot line rearrangement increasing tha size of 4145 Watertown Road to 13.24 acres to allow for future subdl v i a I on of this lot. f^taff recommends that ownership of Outlet A be transferred to 4145 Watertown Road with an access easement to 4115 Watertown Road. Ha reviewed tha additional dedication for drainage easements recommended by the City Engineer. Bellows stated that the subdivision of the larger lot will be expensive due to the drainageway that will have to be crossed to provide an access drive. Pam Sawchuck, 4105 Watertown Road, asked for clarification of the request. Qronbarg explained the proposal would create the possibility for an additional lot on the western side of the lot. MINUTES OF THE «IOIIO PLANNING CONMISSIOH KiiTINQ HELD FEBRUARt I ft, 1»ft3 ZCmiNG FILE #1800 - CCWT. assimsSsSli th« •«P«nd«d w*tl*nd ar®«. l•9•l ^®*^'r** V./AV Road -Ith Parc® I A and tr®n»f®r of owrarship of P®^J •*t®rtown Road, and granting of an accatt ®ftt®fto«*n Road. Ayaa 5. nays 0. appr aval Road, for upon tha Siatartown a to 414b to 4145 (•3) #1803 #000M1LL COUNTRY CLUB. PREL?Ml^iY*^SUB0IVI8I0M - PUBLIC HEARING 8:10 - 9:1ft P.N. Tha Affidavit of Pub 11 cat Ion and Cartif icata of Mailing uara notad. Hanry Kingman. Robart MItchaH and Rick Sathra war® prasant to r^pr0S0nt th# ipoMcantf. Mabusth axpialnad this **** fo”r tna'^p^wsld• r -;:s^or;.•tr.;nn;^;«r;uop;opo ro:,.v.v, - „„tio9 30 mph stand.rd.. St.lt '* „ ,^7, needs, be ,ddr....d end cre.t. • r.coMund th.thow.ver It n.,d not b. con.truct.d .t thi. t Im., .no r. tn. ro.d be upor.d.d to th. point that th. prW.te^ro.o^ ,,,,tin# *;ir.:Vd%-::i?n,“'.T.Zr.n; b.cK-~t .o-n ;-th.r th... cu.- 2^.*^o.d^'':..^r:«7nf.■”.^ Vh*..-rnt':rtn«r.Vo.d”o«tiot.. provI dad. Ballows quasilonad tha road upgrada. Mixh.il .t.t.d th. obl.ct of th. County Club I. to pl.c. th. hou.. « on th. lot .o .. not to ch.n.. th. ...th.tic. of th, ^hrhMruou^d .:p.cr*th"J*’h;S;. l«.tlon .no d..troy th. n.tur.l #nv I rornii#nt prov i d^d • j IUNUTE3 OP THE OHONO PtAHNIIttS COHHISSION MEETINQ HELD FEBHUARY 1ft. 1993 ZONING FILE 91803 - CONT. SmX^r^ th« problMs with th« pltc H« ««lt If thft fgtur* roadway tpaadt approprlata placaa»ant could ba raalixad. nt of tha futura road, wara raducad a mora Mltchall asked why tha road couldn’t ba widanad In tha sama location If naadad in tha futura. Mra. Carpantar. 460 RussalI Avanua. a«prastad concern about tha potential cul-da-sac location. She noted In tha pravious application, it was suggastad tha road ba wldanad to tha south. 8ha felt the road should ba widened to tha north to provide the least amount of Impact to her property. She said she Is not opposed to tha back-out apron. Manry Kingman fait during tha original subdivision of tha area, all these Issues ware addressed and provided for. Nitchall noted tha Country Club does not object to a hammer-head turnaround along tha Carpantar property, or a coaiplata road outiot and tha roadway could be siovad further to tha north. Me said they wish to follow as near as possib'a tha existing road as tha curve Is sharper, but tha slope Is gentler. Ha addressed tha upgrade to tha road after tha construction of the new residence. Bellows noted that par tha coda during tha davalopaiant of tha third lot, tha road must ba upgraded to a private road. Mabusth asked Carpantar if they have access across Outiot A. Carpenter said they are allowed to use the outiot, but it is not feasible to do so. Hitchell confirmed that Carpenters do not have an easement over tha diIveway. Cohen guest Ioned If they Intend to create a road which will require a four-wheel drive to access during tha winter m;>nths. Mitchell said It Is a dasireabla place of property that those who purchase are willing to make the sacrifice to get up the hill. Bellows clarified that streets and roads are a major safety Issue and they have an obligation to make it safe for emergency vahiclas In a safe manner. 1 MINUTES OF THE ORO(«> R.ANNINQ OONNIS8ION ftEITINQ HELD FEBIHjARY IS, Iff3 ZONING FILE t1S03 - OONT. cl«r'fJ«d that tha City Enginttf is noting ths c*»rvs shown doss not issst ths standards for a 30 sioh roadway, thsrafora ha suggasts tha raposittoning of tha road. Ths Enginaar la racoMMsnding tha road ba updradad to a cjl>da-sac at this point. Sha axpiainad tha options for racoasaardstIon lavai labia to ths Planning Coassission. •sMowa Qusstionad ths rational bshind approving ths h«iMi«r-hsad turnaround for thrss rsaidsntisi lots which doss not addrass the r.aad for sa»argancy vahicist. Kabusth atatsd ones again this was bssad on diacustlons during tha first subdivis'on. Johnson clarifisd that tha roadway will naad to ba upgradad at ths tims tha Pruddans proposa a subdiv slon of thair proparty, and tha City will look to tha Pruddans to fund tha ant Ira projact at that tlBu. Ha fait It would bs oora squitabls to iNprovs tha ant Ira roadway to tha naxt logical point of davalops»ant at this tiaia. Mabusth sought clarification and askao if ha Aaant to l«prnvs ths road to a 24' wids road up tha niil, and to not construct tha cul~ ds-sac at this tiiaaT Johnson statad, *‘yas*‘. hlngman fait it would not ba a problsn to do as suggastad, but SAprsaasd dssirs to not hava ths road widsnad to ths north. Mitchall undarstood that tha City would allow a maxiRutm of thraa housas on a privata drivs. Ha said what is bsing prsssntsd >s naw to him and hit cliant and ha will raviaw tha Issuas with tham. Ha said in widanirg ths roadway, thsy wi i i do tha bast they can to widan ths road away froa ths Carpsntsrs* propsrty. 6silows statad that tha road doasn't naad to ba upgradad until tha fourth rssidanca la a widsly-hald mlsconcaption. Habusth notad with a rural saction of road thara would ba mora inpact to tha araa with a 24’ pavad road and 6' ditchas. Sha said an urban saction would rsquira a 26* pavad road maasurad to tha insida of tha cu*'bs. Mitchell said tha) hopad to protact tha natural anvironmant by limiting tha road widtn. Ha said to clear cut for the road would have a tremendous effect. MINUTES or THE OtWm PLANNINQ COMMISSION MEETING MELD FEBRUARY 1#. 1993 ZONING FILE #1103 - CONT. MAbuttfi iugs^tt^d that tha Planning CoMlation includa In thair racoaiaandation tha applicant work with tha City Enginaar to aaaura Orono standards ara uphold and at scma tins considar staap alopaa, location of statura traaa and location of anisting and proposad davalopoMnt. Sallows pol>ad tha Coneilsslon and all agraad that tha roadway should ba axtanded to tha northarn raost lot llna. It was movad by Sallows, sacondad by Rowiatta, to racoanand approval of Application tlS03 voodhlll Country Club, 200 boodhlI I Road, for prallNlnary subdivision craating ona additional rasidantial lot. subjact to tha upgrading of tha privata road naatlng tha Enginaar*s racc»nraandation for such road, and lublact to Conditions ai through 4 in staff m&mo. Ayas 5. nays 0. (§4) 91796 PETER V. T. L*ALLIER. 2684 LYDIARO AVENUE - conditional use permit - fHJBlIC HEARING 7:10 - 7:19 P.M. Tha Affidavit of PubIIcation and Cartificata of Mai Iing wars notad. Petar L’Ailiar was prasent. Habusth statad tha foraiar rasidanca is currantly baing ranovatad. Tha forma' datachad garaga was raaiovad and raplacad with a structura that would sustain a sacond atory garaga attachad by a S' skyway. Tha building parmit for tha living quartars abova tha garaga wara approvad without a kitchan. Tha conditional usa parmit is naadad bacause applicants proposad tha installation of a kitchan. Accass to tha apartmant is via tha sacond story of tha principla structura through an opan axarcisa araa, with sacondarv accass through tha garaga and sacond story raar accass stairs. L'Alliar statad the third accass to tha apartmant is from tha rear through a porch araa. Ha notad tha raason for tha guast apartirent is to provida a rasidanca for his parants. Ha said ha doas not Inland to rant tna unit. Bellows fait tiia avtarior antranca would not meet tha intant of the coda. Johnson agraad that if tha proparty wara sold, tha potantiai of tha apartmant bacrxning a rantal unit is vary real. H1NUTE8 Of THE OHONO PLANNING CONNISStON NEETING HELD FEBRUAfiY If. If$3 ZONING FILE tlTfe - OONT. N«futth tu99«st«d th« tarn* condttloo •• that impotad on Aofart iratda, that bainf tha approval run* with th» ownar not with tha proparty. Cohan said ha iwould Ilka tha plans rtdatignad to isaat tha coda, that baing tha antranca through tha prlnclpla portion of tha rasIdanca. Ballowt agraad that for safaty saHa, thay should allow tha sacond antranca through tha garaga. but fait tha antranca through tha porch araa should ba allnlnatad. L’Alliar agraad to tha raaioval of tha third accast. It was B»vad by Cohan, sacondad by Row I at ta. to racoasaand approval of Application t1796 for Patar w. T. L'Alliar, 2684 Lydiard Avanua, approving a conditional usa paraiit for a guast apartment within tha principle rasidanca, conditioned upon tha raaioval of tha third access through tha thraa*saason porch, an approving resolution filed in tha chain of title indicating tha apartment cannot ba used as a rental unit, and Is issued to cu*’rant owners and If property Is transferred to a new owner. It shall ba tha new owner's responsibility to obtain a new conditional usa permit for tha non- rental apartment or rerova tha kitchen. Ayes 4, nays 1. Johnson voted nay. Johnson fait tha apartment does not swat tha Intent of tha coda to have access through tha primary structure by having a second (•5) d1797 TROY ANDERSON. 1490 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7;50 - 8:10 P.H. Tha Af fIdavit of Pub I I cat lor and Certificate of NalI Ing ware noted. Troy Anderson was present. Vackman explained the applicant proposes the addition of a sacond story over a portion of the existing rasidanca within a substandard aide yard setback. Anderson noted tha condition to upgrade tha septic if necessary *'l th tha addi t Ion. eui.. MINUTES Of THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION HEETINQ HELD FEBRUARY fffj ZONING FILE t1797 - CONT. Kmitn VandcnSrandAn. t460 Lons L«k« Boui«v rd, R»tt rdsldcncdt to th« i*«tt of hit proporty aro lako cottasds. H# tald applauds Andsrton's contribution to tha naighborbood. but axpratsad concarn about tha proxiaity to tha lot Iina and tha tcopa of tha projact. Ha fait tha projact ancroachas his proparty, and raquastad scraaning batiraan tha propartlas. Ha notad his rasidanca Qtaats tha raquirad satbac^. Andarson sgraad to supply scraaning batiraan tha propartiaa. SalloMS notad it would ba vary axpansiva to provida 20* acraahin§ to block tha viaws froai tha sacond story, and askad VandanBrandan*a aipactatlons of tha sc’*aanlng. VandanBrandan fait thara Is not sufficiant araa to provida tha nacassary scraaning. Ha suggastad providing a 30’ aida aasainant to tha proparty to tha north and hava a ccHORsn driva and usa tha araa currantly conscHsad by tha accass aasa«ant for tha na«< garaga. Andarson said that trould cross tha futura saptlc araa and ia not faasibla. Ballows said Andarson has agraad to provida tha scraaning as raquastad, but It appaars that If additional land Is not provided by VandanBrandan, tha plantings stay not ba possibis. Sha fait tha applicant has triad to ba amanabla with tha naighboring proparty ownar. Bavarly Qraaney, 1485 Long Laka Boulavard, asked if tha satback raqulramants do not mean anything. Sallows statad tha applicant is proparly raquasting a varianca as ha .annot mast tha raouiramant. Qraaney objactad bacausa tha adjacant naighbor obiacts. Andarson notad tha addition will not impact tha Qraanay proparty. Senroadar askad if it wars possible to provide tha plantings on tha VandanBrandan proparty. VandanBrandan noted due to tha location of tha power lines, any acraening would ba triranad avary 3 to 5 yaars. Johnson suggastad tha applicant and naighbor discuss tha posslbtIttias and return with a solution. 8 NTNUITS OF THE ORQNO PLAMNINQ COHMISSl(»« HCETINQ HELD FEBRUARY IB. 1993 ZONlNQ FILE 91797 - CORT. And«r»on not«d thl» is ths only tssslblo SKpsntlon to th# propsfty. It «<ss Movsd by Cohsn, sscondsd by Bchrosdsr, to rscoramsnd soDrovsl of AopHcation S1797 Troy Andsrson, 149C long Lsks Boulsvsrd, for a aids yard sstback varlanes to allow th# addition of a ttcond story to ths sxisting rasidsnes, conditioned upon tfia applicant providing natural scraaning along tha wastarn lot llna and subject to prasantatlon of a plan for such to tha City. Ayas 5, nays 0. (tP) si 797 ALBERT S SALLY HA>»ER. IftBS FOX STREET - CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIAMCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7;f0 - 7:10 P.N. Tha Affidavit of Pubiication and Certificate of Hal IIng wars noted. Albert and Sally Hansar ware present. Habusth explained the applicant are raauired to obtain a conditional use parnit for excavations greater than 1’ for the purpose of creating a sadiiaant trap. The City has asked the applicants to consider expansion of tha application that would allow 1’ excavations outside tha proposed pond area, this would provide coApansatory storage for tha filling or expansion of the Fox Street road bed. Mr. Hansar said he was concerned about the effect on the trees In the area. He noted he would be agreeable to the expansion of tha project, If the trees would raotain In tact. Mark Qronberg felt the City protably could not go ell tha way to the edge of tha drainage easeicent, but thay could gat close. He stated they may be able to obtain 18,000-19,000 squara feet surface area, but probably could not obtain the 21,000 square footage as requested by the DNR. Bellows asked If there was any other area they could obtain. Habusth felt If the City could use a portion of Mansers' property for mitigation, they could find a smaller area to make up the difference. She suggested presenting the applicants’ portlonof tha request to the Council, and staff continue to work with the applicants on the expansion of the project. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of Application #1799 for Albert and Sally Manser, 1685 Fox Street, for a conditional use permit and variance to allow the excavation of 8,000 s.f. area to craate a sadiroant trap. Ayes 5, nays 0. MINUTES OF TMt OMOMO PLAMHINQ COMMISSIOH IffETIMG HFLO FEBRUARY 16. 1993 a ii, ^ (•/) flBOl 6.W. BLANCH COHPAMV, “^SSSl^UiHO - .:30 P.". Tb. AJtld.vit ot Pubttc.tlon .nd C.rttftc.t. of «.mn« n.r. not.d. Coh.n «b»tatn.d fro* wy dt.cot.ton r,«»rdlnb this It.# «nd l.ft th« At thl# ti»«, 9:16 p.in. #.bu.th ..ol.lned .hi. I. th. fir.. „|^„Vd'’ ho-' nn“ d..lln« -Ith .llo«.d flood pi.1^ I" «h» •ai:rrnd'’Vh’’;’n:;d‘’:o*;.i.. r;"vi.«*d ..................................................... "• to b. ;rUn*d’\h:'o7drn.hc*.“'fh ordin.nce do., not .ddr... o lot ot thi. type. Scnro.d.r f.it th. propc.d .tructur. do., not violate th. Int.ot Of th« coda. It wa* wovad by ’q/V®”**?** Blanch^” 2505 Ol*d^ach approval of ^PP'V*?^h«^var 1 1 ca**halght ordmanca. per thars;bVp*."^:;Sr:.;Vd ‘%r trrp:uint. .y- nay. o. cob.n abatalnad. (ffS) i1B02 OROMO IMOEPEHDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT •27i. 770 OLD CRYSTAL ROAD ~ ucarimQ 9*30 - 9:50 P.M.CONDITIONAL USF PERNIT - PUBLIC HEARiNa 9. Th. Affidavit of Publication and C.rtific.t. of H.illn, -era not.d. ?• " k l\ n"inV PoVs-Xon TVoVrV m.ifbeV.? Mri’an U^Dellucr'^C^un 1 1 y frcil.on' SutMr Be;. Ha.land. Architect; -ar. Pra.ant to rapra.ant tha School DIatrIct. 10 k »*1NUTE8 OF THE ORONO PLAMNING 00NMI8SI0N MEETINQ HELD FEBRUARY If93 ZONING FILE 91902 - OONT. Nafutth •xplaintd tna applicant •••kt approval of a conditional uta psrnlt to parMit th# addition to tha axittinj day cars structura to allow axpanaion for tht latch kay programs. Sha notad tha church Mill continue to usa tha structura on Nadnasdays and Sundays. Sha noted sooe corrections to the plans: the School District will not construct a new perking area but will expand on the existing, and no drainage swales are proposed. All improveoients on the site meet the 50* setback frois all property lines. The City Engineer has asked for raised curbing along the north side of the parking lot. She noted there will be no change (n current drainage pattern. She reviewed the landscape plan for the property. She noted the City will reQuest an easement for the bike trail that intercedes property within 500* of the street setback area. Sha explained how the parking lot Is used for over~flow parking by the School for special events, and the Police Chief has indicated he would like the parking area expanded to 50 or 50 stall capacity. Bellows stated this project is pert of an over-all concept for tha campus ares. She agreed with the Police Chlaf that the additional perking Is an appropriate reauest. Habusth noted the Police Chief was pleased to see the addition of lighting. She explained the School will be using the some size signage as approved for the church. Lawson explained the School District feels the parking area does not need the additional parking, and notad Its activitlas will never coincide with that of the Church's. He felt the addition would not facilitate a larger congregation. He reminded them that the School District does own the SO-*-/- acres to the north and additional parking could be supplied at a later date on that property. Rowlette said sha Is concerned about the semi-circle proposed to direct traffic. She Questioned if the area will create a traffic problem. Habusth stated this design Is similar to the driveway layout used on the scnool campus and involves one way directional lanes. She would recQoxsand tho same for this site. Rowlette expressed concern about the design of the parking area. Bellows noted this is an whi'e driving. ares that you want to slow people down 1 'id HIHUTES or *^3 »r tha cional Ion of t size a does I will dltIon m that th and 1 that sad to raffIc it used »3. She ZONING FILE t1802 - CWT. OaLuca trStract^ traffic ihuHn tS uie th. .r.. dur.09 day c.r. hour,. of th, pirhlnd lot »M I 6, Involv.d InNabusth notad a siaall tha raised curbing. «s«P.r. f.lt th.-. .. . . . .tor th. .dd.non .nd th. School runs a fine program. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . next Board moating. a bond to cover tha L.,.on ou..tlon.d th. n..a to po.t laiproveiBtnts. H.b..th ,t.t.d th.t thl. r.due.t would b. b..t .ddr....d by th. CouncII. nii^d:n,“th^•‘:.^^•^o?T?J^^Tt.orfv.^K.r .. .. n.v.r r..lli.d to It. full «•>>•<= *J:.®"odg r.quir,. 40 »t.ll» for rhrc*uVr.nt'^.‘-^oV tZTli,] th. «o.t r..trlctlve of th. ■Hjitlol. U8.» propom.d. Ctue. ld°r'.nV- nUdL”tni“U.V"%ouVd p“ovlSi'’Sli?7! iSUr.rtL'p^TKln*, TrT<>i:\ not n..d to b. ..P.nO.d. d:t“.‘*f VaVun, "b.c'ii.I.". Tp;i“bT« ;:«ron''*th.* Wp"rovVl‘of th. conditional use permit. MINUTES Of THE OMOMO PLANNING OOMNI88ION MEETING HELD FEBRUAPV It, Iff3 ZONING FILE t1t02 - OONT. It was novad by Johnson, sacondad by Schroadar, to racoasaand approval of Application i1802 Orono School District #276. 770 Old Crystal Bay Road, granting approval for a conditional usa parisit to allow tha construction of an addition to tha axisting dav care buHding, basad on conditions prasantad by staff, and basad cn tha numbar of parking stalls ba maintained at 40 stalla. Ayas 4. nays 0. Mabusth askad that ona stall ba approved within tha raquirad satback araa. All mambars agraad that would ba appropriata. (if) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Thara mss no raport. (§10) OTHER ISSUES Ballows asked that they try to batter use the neana of coomunlcat Ion between tha Planning Como I as Ion and Council. (•11) APPROVAL Of MINUTES It was iiiovad by Bellows, sacondad by Johnson, approva tha alnutas of tha January 19, 1993 Planning Coasaisslon meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. (•12) REPRESENTATIVF TO THE COUNCIL MEETING Bellows volunteered to attend tha meeting March 6, 1993 Council meat Ing. ADJOURNMENT Chair Ballows adjourned the regular Planning Coontisslon meeting at 10:06 p.m. Maureen Ballows, Chair Parson H PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TLESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1993. 7:00 P.M. 2780 KELLEY R\RKM AY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATTVi: - J. Diana Gortten ATTEN'DANCE SCHEDLXED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.7:00 p.m. #1798 Fred and Barbara Ryan. 1345 North Ann Drive - ViciiJon 2. 7:30 p.m. #1800 Michael Plank. 4115/4145 Watertown Road - Subdivisk» of a Lot Line Rearrangement 3. 8:00 p.m. #1803 WoodhiD Country Club. 200 WoodhUl Road - Preliminary SuNiivisicn ACTION ITEMS * Rcvkw of Oicae items wUl commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Applkanu presenting tariance requests before fhe Commission art asked to trove to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application Is oimounced by the Chairman. #1796 Peter W. T. L’AIIkr. 2684 Lydiard Avenue. Conditional Use Pennil - Public Hearing 5. 6. #1797 Troy AndefsoB, 1490 Long Lake Boulevard - Variance - Public Hearing #1799 Albert and Sally Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - Conditional U» Pcrmit/Varianco Public Hearing 7 8 #1801 E. W. Blanch Company. 2505 Old Beach Road - Variance - Public Hearing #1802 Orono Independent School District #278,770 Old Crysul Bay Roati - Coaiiiional Use Permit - Public Hcanng IPIanning CommissioD Comments 9. Report by Planning Commission Ripresenutive to Council Meeting of F'.bruary 8. 1993 (Edward Cohen) 10. Other issues for discussion. % M i PLANNING CQ>PTT5$!0> MEETTSO Tl’ESDAY, FEBRUARV IW3. 7:00 P3L Additiooal llems Planninf Commissioa oj^TovaJ of minuta of the January 1<>. 1993 meetinf. 12. Hanning Coi the CouKil. U) select a representative to attend the .March 8. 1993 meeting of Atljour 1 Planning Ccnsaisiior.Csuncll PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY or CRONO MEETING DATE PEEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (pl«aM print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. 2^ tci'1 \i . /X^.. V fl■ i,a . ^ t'Hl 4 /V’ 1. Cr/' ■#/./ 79 7. 5 • iT\ i i ^^ /f«r J r) 7#^ 6. 1 1 7. ^ T 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. .5. .6. .7. .9. • • :o. L *ir I ^ • ‘ l-^r t!.; ir FrI i » I 1 f» • y* s i > I i i I ! M" i H I I ►-*I i IUI • f f M f *- f * Sj t .! ill I J 1 tl n 1 ill 11 f f I i \ I I 8 ■« <« p p f; f| ::. i i ns i I I »5 I 9 I P ^h i r1 8 8 H I ® II% cn ^: I I 5I £ 5 y r ^ 1 k*^ M f 1^ ■?5 I ! ^ I I I ^ [ I m 7z? 5B« illSip 5 <p /. TO: FROM: DATE: Raimu^ Commission Members Ron Moone. City Administraior Jeanne A. MabuMh« IBuikiing <% Zoninf AJmini\ffator F<+nur> 8. 1993 StTUFCT*; #1798 Fred and Baitara Ryan. 1345 bicxth Arm Drive - Vacatu» ol Dedicated Rond - Public Hearing (7:00 p.m.) PrrtiiKiit Ordinamre Scetkm 10.12. V’aettiofi of streets, alley and public roads. Pottions of Forest Blvd. were vacated for nine pn^ert>T owners on March 2S. 1988. Applicants ofiginally joined in with ten remaining property’ owners in May of 1988 to complete total v^tion of Forest Bh-d. The applkaiion was tabled at the Planning Coomission based on one of the ten property owner’s claim that a previous vacation had landlocked his property (review Exhibits H nnd D. The Planning Commission dircctel that the City make every tnen^ to resolve land owners’ problem re,^:ii;ng from a vacation in the early ’70s and that the Planning Commission would act on the remaining vacation of Forest Blvd. as sot>n as that is resolved. The Ryans havu ar*plied for a separate vacation of Forest Blvd as the sale of their property has been jeopardized because vacation has not been cennpieted. Members may recall that dedicated Fi>rest Blvd. is used for lake access of all abutting private property owners. I.isi of Exhibits A - Application B - ProfKTty Owners List C - Plat Map D * Legal Description of Property to be V'acated E • Council Minutes of 3/28/88 F - Planning Commission Minutes of 6/2d'88 G - Map Propcnics Vacated in ’88 ami Properties Pending Vacation Approval H Nelson Letter 3/10/88 I - DNR Letter 3/11/83 J - Survey of Nelson Property and Driveway Review of Current Request Mr. and Mrs. Ryan have been patiently wailing for the final vacation of Forest Blvd. In fact, they had assumed that the vacation was completed by now and sold their property as if Forest Blvd. bait been vacated. Recent title searches confirmed that the vacation was iKver completed and applicants ioi desperation have filed for a separate vacation so that the sale of their property can be finalized. • » Zoning File #1798 Fcbnm>’ 8. 1993 Fage 2 Rertev of AopOcation #12^ Applkauoo #1298 involved vacation fequea of the ten renuininf; property owners. The City had already approved the vacation for nine property owners in March of 1988. Review Exhibit H. Nfr Ne’ one of the applicanu joining in Application #1298, advisel the Cuy of his need to resolve access to the property. As with the vacation of Forest Blvd.. all legal access to his property is vacated. Remember Mr. Nelson had submitted the letter for the earlier vacation Application (#1251) Planning Commission tabled all action on Application #1298 until Mr Nelson's access problems were revived. The City Auomey ’s otT^e and staff have been working on vaHous atlempu to achieve legal access for Mr. Nelson. It is still Mr Nelson ’s position that it u the City's responsibility to acquire access since the City approved the vacation withait assuring that appropriate access ea«rocnis were provided to his property. Members may also remember that the City has sewer lines within vacated Oak Place and appropriate utility and access casements were never acquired by City. In 1989 the sttff wem through deuilcd nirvcying and the creation of legal descriptions for the four affected property owners to gram caaroents over vacated Oak Place to Mr Nelson. When one of the four property' owners demanded variances for future construction of the City for the graming of the casemern. the City ceased all dealings with owner and owner ’s attorney. Another attempt was m»k to have a single property owner gnuu an easemem over one side of the vacated nght-of way but in the end after the documents were prepared the single propeny owner refused to grant easements because of potemial impact on existing mature plamings. Other legal avenues were considered such as the original vacation not being coasidcred valid but this option proved to be far too cumbersome and costly. The City is m>w considering obtaining a prescriptive easemem over Nelson ’s drive located within the vacated right-of-way. This cmild be either completed by Mr. Nelson or the City on his behalf. If Mr. Nelson pursued the registration on his own. the City would be rcsp*>nsihle for the paymem of all legal fees. The City must obtain utility easements via another method. Review FIxhibil G. Forest Blvd. has been vacated to the immediate southwest of the Ryan property . The vacation of I oresi Blvd. adjacem to the Ryan property wtvuld have no impact on the Nelson dilemma. In fact the only portion of Forest Blvd. that could not be vacated would be the portions adjacem to the Johnson prt>pcrty. It will be stafFs recommendation that wc proceed with Ok vacation of the remaining seven property owners and complete the total vacation of Forest Blvd. until the Nclstm access and City sewer casemems are resolved. StafT Kecominendatiun To approve the vacation application of Fred and Barbara Ryan that would seek the vacation of Forest Bl'd. along the west lot lines of Lots 6 and 7 and 23 of Lot 5, Block 6. 1 ' .'.yg Zoning File #179S Febniary 8. 1993 Page 3 m. Thii ipprov^l i$ based on the followiiif finiings 1. The vacatkm dtoes ml tflcct the »ccev% or the fse of adjoinii^ l^openies. 2. 3. The Ciiy IttS qpI ai^ doe^ not intend to dcs^lop. impros-e. or u« the dedicated nghl*cf*way of Fofea BUd. for road purposes. The Citv has not d->W not intend to matntaini or imfa ll utiTitJci within the dedicated lighl-of-vk^y jf Forest BlvdL 4i. The unimprov«l ttMk.itgd right-of-way as it cxisB sefVei no public pirpose CITY Qi* OROHO - CBilSAI LiUiD DSB APPLigATlOM ' ---------------------------------- -----------------------------............................................................ piopomr lch:atioh 7^^ ^ Sit* Address / 3 «\v ■ Q ^ Property Identification HuBbat (P.X.D.) C j 7 *4/ .4 oot* Please attach le^al description to application if not included on required survey. AFPLICAliT Naee <3. Phone (home) i-4'77- Phone (eork) Address ( 3^^ - Ar»n Or Cityt 71cu/\d^ Zip I. I (if different than applicant) Phone (hoaie) ^- 7Q-Ca^ Na»e - i k. «r-v i C. c- j Phone - Address I ^ A). tA~r(yS S_ _ Cit^ ^ ^ C Lt t Ari ZipJ^ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Date Property Acquired (month/year) PCBS • CXWXTXOHAL OSB PBKNITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential accessory Use $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credlt/Bldg $250.00 CoBBBercial/Industrial Use cm OF cr<i5€ FimHCE OFFICF ijtOOOOOCC 01 CEM 150,^ uiCk 71 ISO.i {<ECE1FT-Tim: YOU ^60i00 cool m Tit 01/2i $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated %fetlamd or floodplain Grading and filling — 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of la)ceshore PRD/PID “ see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Cr.rrent Application Fee OtHKK APPLICATIONS $200.00/ Coasiercial Site Plan Review (<t consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezoning (PUD ~ refer to fee schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USB OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Dse of Property Residential Other (specify) DESOIXmOII OP RBQO^T Describe request in detailt 2. REQUIRED SUBNITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtai this list froa Hennepin County Departnent of Finance A-f03 Coverniser Center 346-3271/. Plat Map. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). Construction plan* if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application* please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 3. 4. 5. f. 7. TOO ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCOMEWTS OR_ h WORRim COPY Cll* X 17* OR 9IALLBI) POR ALL DOCUNEHTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete Initials of Clerical Staffi_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPLICAET'S SIGMATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator* agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant'8 signature Date OMIBRS SIGMATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff* consultants* agents* commission members* and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date i Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prirr to the meeting. u P'S!'.! IV H7 J S' COFFIN L CRON HI Kp. INC •UMWTIMa ^ “ 4M1 A TAMAfRA^AVtlAA lq-h l*«i _ _ J «TS «1«« May 27. 1988 Proposed road vacation descriptions (continued) Mn^ runnina from the aidpoint of the northwesterly line of Lot 5. said Block 6, to the aidpoint of the southeasterly line of said lot 5. RYAN PORTION That nart nf vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of ^SJoa'^Jni Revised Hennipin CO. Minn." which lies between the northwSllirfriJtensions Across it of the southwesterly ine of 5?JaiQht line Running from the aidpoint of the northwester y ne of Lot 5. said Block 8. to the aidpoint of the southeasterly line of said Lot 5. HOWELLS PORTION Th*t n^rr of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of "Saaa Hill Revised Hennepin Co. Minn.** which lies between the northwesterly extensions across it of the Northeasterly line of Lot 4, Blockmil southwesterly 1ine of Lot 5. said Block l5. SOLBERG PORTION That part of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin Co., Minn." which lies between the northwester 1y extension across it of the Northeasterly and South westerly lines of Lot 8, Block 15."Saga Hill Revised. Hennepin County, Minn." KELLEN PORHON That Dart of vacated Forest Boulevard as dedicated in the plat of -Saga'^Si11 Revised. Hennepin Co.. Minn." which lies between the northwesterly extensions across it of the northeasterly line Lot 8, Block 15, "Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County. Minn, and the southwesterly line of Lot 7, said Block 15. . i (2) minutes op the REGULAII OftOHO COUNCIL rriNC HELD HAZtCU 2S, 19lt ,124B WILLIAMS th« City should do something about thss# streets. Acting Mayor Callahan agreed with Cocnci1member Goetten, and because of this issue felt that condition #4 in the drafted resolution pertaining to the access to the site should be omitted. Councilmembers Sime and Coetten amended their motion to omit condition #4 from the resolution. Motion* Ayes 4, Rays 0. •1250 DAMA %mXS 1397 OKONO LAMB VARIAMCB RBSOLOTIOH 12318 Dana Wells was present for this matter . City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a side setback variance to construct a garage addition. It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by Counci Imember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #^88 approving the variance per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1251 AUDRBY SCHOLT2 — partial vacatiom op forest BQQLSVARP IRBSOLOTIOMS #23§9 “ #2397Audrey Schults was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request a partial vacation of Porest Boulevard, the remainder of Vine Place and portion of a park. Saga Hill Revised, plat. He noted that all property owners within 350 of the subject properties were notified of the application. A number of affected property owners refused to join in the application, hence tne proper legal notice has been given only for the proposed portion, therefore, a total vacation of Porest Blvd. is not possible at this time. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue of access to the Nelson property and the need for an easement agreement from 3 other property owners before a total vacation of Forest Blvd. could be done. He also noted an error on the plat map that shows a the park as unvacated where in fact it is actually vacated. MIKUTBS OF THE REGULAR OROHO COOWTIL KKETIIiG HELD RARCE 29, 1518 • )251 8CBULTX COMTltiUEDHs. Schults not«d that tha sain raaaon many proparty ownara did not join in tha application was thair objaction to paying for a survey. Xoning Adsinistrator Mabusth stated that staff is going to be working with tha other property owners toward a total vacation and at this point individual surveys of tha properties are not naca-sary, but there will be a cost to tha property owner*, involving tha descriptions. Tha reason for th- survey requirement for tha Schults's application was to establish tha ordinary high water sark along Forest Blvd. It was sovad by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by CounciIsasbar Sisa, to adopt tha Resolutions #2389 to •2397 vacating an unused portion of Forest Boulevard, an unused portion of Vine Place and a portion of a park, within the Plat of Saga Hill Revised, as And further give notification to affected residents of the intent to vacate the reeaining portions of Forest Boulevard. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 81253 B. JOffl UlTOAHt# J*. •' 1405 B08MS POIMT ROAD) VARIABCB RESOLOTIOH 8239I Lindahl, Jr. was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to replace an existing accessory shed and detached garage wi*h a single detached garage with an attic area prJvldlng much needed storage. Hardcover is not an issue. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that there major regrading to correct the severe grade of the driveway entrance. She also noted that applicant will be granting a road and utility easement to the City over the traveled portion of the roadway known as Bohns Point Road that intersects the subject property. jt was moved by Counciloember Sine, seconded by Councilmember Coetten, to adopt Resolution #2398 as * submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 8 MIHUTES of TBB PlJUnilKC COWHISSIOII MEFTIHG BBLD JUNS 20* 15lt I129S RiCHMO JOHBSOB __ VACATION OF POFTIOIte OF FOREST BOOIiSVWa) SXCABILL REVISED WBUC BBWIWJ of rublicatlon and Certificate of Hailing w«r« notpd. Richard Johraon vat pratant for thla ■attar. Mabutth axplainad th« raqueat to vacata tha rainalnlng ovnart. Cohan and Haraon fait that tha laqal rc40lvad pricr to raconmandino approval application in ordar to avoid tha chance of land locking tl.a Nelson proparty. It was noted that Mr. Raison is currently working on this legal access with*his attcrnay. Councll».«ber C.lleh.n f.lt ror.Jt lT*lS open until legal access to the Nelson property l» resolved. Thera ware no cocmients fro* the public regarding this natter. It ... •ow.d by Cohcn< e.cood.d by K.lley. to t.bl. thie Mtt.r p.ndlr.9 re.olvo of l.ga 1 ....Bent acce.» to tha Nelson property. Motion. Ayes 7# Nays 0. #1299 MAI^ BIGGIMS 3017 HORTB SHORE DRIVE COHDITIOHAL OSB PERMIT ro»lic BMIHC publication .nd C.rtltlcat. of Mallln, ware noted. t Nancy Higgins was present for this matter. Mabuath explained the unit permit to recognite the principal residence. Applicant plans princli^l residence and construct a new residence. Kelley advised applicant to hardcover ordinance when developing a site p new residence. use and th@ the tha che ! 8 2, . i 1i‘ '5' ZJ5- y< • •>71 A<?«f V. f » <'! ?, -teyc??./ J ft <H. -1=r-M>; \* f»./ /ft Cl '' ft. *w Kr^j 1 nT -><«c r=^,< .C,'’* Vj fe, V/ \ % "S- •/ / ft? ,•7i\.rA:/^x^ m. k imJ #4 % .511»’|^ ^ f'9 i i \v <* c4 IIt, r ft z f “«V»Xrt ll.Z 2 -fi <■3 f /-;} C •> ,f?A; •■ tf (> I'j 'vK--f/r{'/v\ \« >\ j/ < xrT^^ ^^i/ v; V. ^ <• V ifi *.. / // i March 10, i CloalnQ of Foroot Hvd. At thl« tioo I ou»t ebjoct to th« closiro of For#«t ®lvd At could larvO^loc^ f^v proportv* In 1972 Orooo clovod Oak Fljca «o that I aa now driving on preportv Palonqing to four oiffarant proportv ownor*. Thi« Map dona without notifying aa* Thia problaa auat ba solvad t>afora Foraat Blvd can be cloaad* I would lika Foraat Blvd clo^ad in front of ov propartv whon thia problao la aolvad. .1 •^1 A <C dnNitituaarw •*V I SIAIi Of ^ 0^ [1S OTTA"department of natural resources so 294-7523 H«rcli lit 1988 1200 VA1LNF8 lOAD, ST. PAUL. MS 35104 A. HalMisth •ttll41og 4 Zoning AteiniatraCor CITT OF OtOSO Foot Office Box 66 CrTOtoI loy. i® 55323 til AFFLICATI08 #1256 SITtOFOLITAJI WASTI COHTIOL CGhMlSSIOS COKDITIOSAL USE FCIMIT/VABIASCE APPLICATION #1258 JOHN 6 KATHY EHLEKT. 1785 COSCOtDIA STIEXT APPLICATION! #1231 AUDREY SCHULTZ - VACATION OF ROAD Dour Mo. Nabuotht Tbank you for ocsdlng infomotloo for^ our rovlow on tho obovo rofertncod pemito. Our cofflsontt on •ach' application follou. Tha upgrading and raplactcent of oewor linaa la nalaly a concern of the DSR Urda Buraau. Tha Dlvlalon of Wat era will hawa a chance to conBafit through tha Buraau of Landa llcanaa procedure. Pralinlnary iadlcationa are that lapacta to protected watera will be mlnlMl becauta tha aawar line la Boatly beneath tha axlatlng roadway. According to the plana received Kerch 3. 1988, the Chlcrt houaa addition doaa not encroach below tha 931.0* elevation. ^ Flood Inaurance Rate Map (encloeed) and the City of Orono e Flood Ordinance conalder elevation 931 the 100 vear flood elevation, we hay no floodplain concema. (We underatand howeve^ that the Minnehaha Creek VSD usee 931.5 aa the 100 year flood elevation.) _ T* The application for vacation of roada along the aoutheaat ihore / Foreit Lake doea not ralae any protected watera conceraa. Thank you again for the opportunity to r.vlew theee projecta. If you have any queetlona, pleaae feel free to call. Sincerely, ^7 Ton lovey Staff Kydrologiat METRO REGION DIVISION OF WATERS Enclosure cc: Jack Anderaon Jl/dv AN equal opportunity EMPLOYER C»*rl I f iCdl^ ot Survey ^or 111y of Orono in lots t. 2, i. Rlotk. b, and Lots 1, ?. 3. Block /, bAGA Mill RtVlbtn H^nnopin County, ftinnnsoti ^Nue l>oa: Datt: Subject: OrofiD Ptarmif^ CoenmisMOO Mcmbcfi Ron Miwne. City Mmiaiitniot Stephen Weeknun. On-Site Systems Manager Fetmury 9, 1993 #1800 Mkhaei Flank • 4115. 4145 Watcfiown Road Subdiviskm • PuMk H»rinf Z I 11 i 11.nkfrfrt* RR>1A. Rural Residenikl, 5 acre miniimra pifriinmi Ordinanrr • Snbdivtskm. Class 1.Cluf^r 11.03. Stibd. 2. Detlnitkiaf Total area • 19.4 Kres Dry acres ■ 16.7 acres Wetlands « 2.7 acres 2. Section 10.27, Subd. 5 (B) - Lot Standards. List of Exhibits A • Af^lication B • Property Owners Lts; C - Plat Map D - Survey E - Engineer’s Report Dneripfion of Requesll The applicant requests a lot line raura ngemcoi between 4145 and 4115 Watertown Road. Iocs A and B rcspcctis-cly. The proptwed subdivision will decrease the sire of Lot B to 6.16 acres from 14.2 acres, while increasing the si/c of Lot A to 13.24 acres trom 5.0 acres. Both lots do meet all minimum sundards of the RR-IA roning district such as lot area and width as well as all structure setbacks from newly aligned property lines. Both properties have code conforming existing septic systems and the alternate drainfield sites arc still available as defined in the initial subdivision of these properties. The City Engineers have noted that drainage and utility easements should be altered aloi^ the lot lines as well as a revised drainage easement based on the 939.0 contour (Exhibit E). Access to Uh B is provided along Outlet A which has been legally combined with Ijot B since the initial subdivision. As the applicant has expressed Lnierest in selling Lot B and subdividing Lot A further, the City should request that ownership of Outlot A be transferred to Lot A with an casemem granted for access tt> I.ot B. This will assume an approved future access tor ll» additional lot. i i. Zooang File f ISOQ' Fdmui}' 9, 1993 Pige 2 DisciIIJULlil The primarv issues for this aiWi' iswn •« the recomminJed changes to the cxiMing drains cMcnieiitt and ne^^ The City Engwers recomnKnd the additioa of 95 acres 03 the exbling draiw^ casoneni. Isa^ on a 9?9 0 elevation ^hich ist«ld chantc the dr> buildafck acreage to 10 6 acres m Lot A in order to restnet the use of a low IviM area adiacem to the wetland boundary as defined by the normal water level. This casemem U has a signincaot impact on the wetland. The curreia drainage and xmhxy easoM must be vacated and a new one drawn to reflect the new prc^srity lines. Ouiloi A must be divided trom Lot B and legallv combined with Lot A so that propefiv is not landlocked and U reserved for ftmire develofwicnt This to line rcarrai^^ Lot A with approximately 10.6 acres of dry bu.ldable land, ia the future In order to provide access to this prrpciry. we feel th*t Outto A should be iiKorporaied with Lot A and an ctscmcni granted for access to Lot B. This wouU l^^Tlforto addttional lot. At the time this property b aibdivided, the boundaries for Quito A should also he changed to include the actual nad providing access to Lot B. Staff would recommend aRirov^ of aibdivision application #1^ provided U» drainage and utility easements are amended as noted above and ownership of OuUot A is Lot A with an casement granted providing access to L*« B. The vacaiioo o rainage cascroents may be completed at the time of a future subdivision. ■i ^ *■ •> CITY OF OFOIIO - SUBDIVISIOH AFPLICATIOB PKPaTt LOCATIOB Sit* Addr***^-/ / / -JJ/wJ^'J -M-n A V.-^' ;> t: < o \j • Prop«rty Identification Nuab#r (P.I.D.) i - y/ APl«a»« check on* - Property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application.Pf APPLICAHT Name - Addrees 1/^/O V City Phone (hccte) ^ Phone (work)_ _ _ _ (if different than applicant) T^£jt Name dg//^ V C’i^y'^U ‘H C Phone (hone ) Phone (work) Addresss fi>rtiA . (attach list ii more"than one! City:/y/zip i BZ18T1BG LAND OSB Nv2ffiber of Tax Parcels Development Size iS Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels iResidentiaL: no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District// ^ //*/A PROPOSAL _ _ _ Division for Tax Purpose* Y Lot Lin* Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _ _ Subdivision for Hew Building Site* Humber of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed*Use I (check) Existing Unit* New Units Total units Units per Acres Sq Peet Dry Buildabl* Land Residential Other (specify)^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ laVTIiUM HATSRIAL mSCESSAXY FOR CCMPLBTB PRELIMINARY APPLICATIOH 1. 2. 3. Completed Application Fora »utt obtain this Hat free rer.iiepin Coxinty Department cf Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). ^ ^ ,1 .. rAs an addendum to this application# please attach a separate list or any other persons you vish notified of this application. Certification by Xonin? Department that PrellBinary Plat Application is coaiplete. Zoning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Dutm 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sever and water assesssents). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Pinal Plat Applicaticn is complete Zoning Official's Slgnature^^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Dete^- - - - - - - -- t Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II * HD >< Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $200.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class I * II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III a all non-residential) 300.00 323.00 ♦ 25.00/Lot Pinal Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Pinal Subdivision Application 130.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Cosmission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature (^ pA* ^Date /3L Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cononlssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ma)ce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 1 o o #1 1 «n\ 1 tj-\J \ V A % ^ J^ r N '^**s'mo«^ CITY«f ORONO DATA PIUVACT ADVISORY In accordance vith M.S. 15.1(5» "Right* of aubjecta of data"# wai vould *lke to inf or* you that your toning request with the City of Orono or any of ita d*part*enta aay require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You e-e notified thati 1. 2. 3. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualifications for approval. You aay refuse to supply data# but refusal aay require that the City deny the request. The information may be shared with other local# state or federal agencies to the extant necessary to process the request. If your request requires Council action to approve# seise information aay becoaie public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. X5.1€b to review private data on yourself. f. Your full naae is required to prcress this application. MJN MTf lZ/2S/«2 •1TC1I tit um Otcff N«M| tAX»AVli HM«/| $m It Nit 9^tf MTtKTOMt M 9 mm j mATf couit J m«TT *22* MATfinciM KMi nmi ruiM m BtSBtFlM memtxi IWatHAfl® StSTUt racwiTf (5*<*s ttsr M St-tlS-ft It Mlt «*2» nrttTt««« *9 r j rfMv • e J c 4mkims Tiams TtisT/v<*« •*• OMNO OaCMMO *fl HATUTA W wwT ». n%t$^i 9ACt I S1*1l«-;t !♦ 999T HAitiTcm m tttmm Rf«i9H II At lAAl* AOAIW AIM MATIRKMt m HAI*il 9LAIS m SS35* WBf iO«« KM«a NAMI TAXRAVft MAMI/AOM CAtCa MM fAXTAVCa HAIC/AOOt mam Aom TAXPATCR :/ (HCI MM tAXTAVia tuir'AOOK si-iw-rt *1 •••* NATmtaMi o SUSAN tortr-M SUSAN RORfSM AS%e NATCRTtMt »9 HATII riAlN IM iSSS9 S« 51-llA-lt ♦! 9««1 •Aon HATctraff n C f 9Atf tot AAUtiOM cMisTonca r sau CCMI l rAUtSON AMS naurtomi ko WLRll RIAIH »*l SStSAi M si-iia-n 42 0001 Me*s cMirriHA tA R I SORIICCH ITAl RORfRT I SORCNSCN A2AS CMlOrCHA lANt NAPtl RIAIN M« SStS# S« 51-llR-lt Al 009 to AOORISS umssi9C0> NINritlRfO N ORVANT HIMIlIRfO H SRYAHT C/0 MIRII STHI5 IMU lAMVlIH UR LCSO LAU SStS* n-ll8-2t 41 ooot NAIIRTCMI RO lARl N ROHM ITAL |A«i N ROMA a Oa S MAURTOm to HARiC R1A1N MM SASAO SR tl-llO-tt *1 OAllf HAURTOIM RO H R • H C RIAM MICMACl R A HART I RUM 4145 MATIRTIMI M MARlf RIAIN tM 55SS0 SO tl*110*n 41 RRR* 04ZA5 CMTRRfMA IA AMI I UTfRSON MRCtUA J IROST 42AA CMimHA LAIC mn.1 RIAIM »OI SAtSA Sl-ll8-tt 4* AOORISS UHASSiaXO STATt or Ml»#« STAT6 or MI»M IRAI ILUCI LUC TRAIL! io tl-119-ZS 41 04104 MATTRTCMt RO 0 VlOUIM A A eiClCRI JCl a RAH saacnuk A101 HAURTOm RR MARlf OtAIN M« AAtAO IR S1-11R*TS 41 MU Oa UA HAURTOm RR MICMACL R • MARY t RIAMI, HICMAII R A MARY C RLAMS A14S MITfRTPMM M NAOtl RlAINlOi 55154 50 tl-UO-Ct 4t 0«1 04SS5 chirrcma la rOCOCRICK I SMIMAfCil JR CTAL rtCR I SICMMfl RT 2 ROK 1* flARU RIAIH Iff 4SSA4 SR S1-118-Z5 42 MU 04S05 CNIRRCMA lA J I COmiCK I R l CORMKR JAMTS A OCRRA CORNtU 4t05 CHIRRCHA LAtC MiRlC RlAtN Ml A5tA4 4 C c mam um OM«A NAMC TAXrtVlR NAMC/AORR to Sl-UO-21 42 C012 04220 CMTRRfHA lA RAMCIA CAU ANDCRSCM RAMCLA C AIRRRSOM 4220 CMIPRCHA lANI HARLl RLAUC MN 5555* SO S1-UR-2S 42 MIS 04 UO CHlRRtttt IA L r NARTINIAU/J H MAR*INCAU LARRY C A JIAH M MART UR AO asm CNirRTHA IA HARLl RIAIN Ml SS5SA SR 31-110-25 45 OMS OMSO A00RCS3 UIASSICMEO MUllAM r RMARR MIUIAH r RMARR 4500 RAVS1PR RO HARIC RIAIN Itl 55354 ■ai un MTOI mi KHxani ctxtfrr MK»t«n imochaiiom iv&fiii •TV at*mn it^v If m. PT«i; rtSi A f A^AVfl / » AS MU t«lAt TUMNNAM •§ MAI savings MNC •AVIS A SfTfrs US ruMNMAtl to MATtt rtAIN W« SSiS*' M Sl-ltS-tt AA AMS tssM AMwrss UNASSiCNrg ISrAtl IAM» MAT 5TAT1 lAA* SSAT fOa SMI TO ASJACtNf •TV (•••• (MiV si-iis-rs AA ctTSTorm tit • M lAMSlia • • • lAMUR •AVtt • TA»eLta M« MUlStK Ml MAvzATt iM sssn piaS' tern TAXSAVia tmm/mm TOTAIL iATCN mi men m ^SSL^kla) Nr I o "€‘\ \ »,i o I'. 1 CftTIfY THAT Jm TACTS HfmUHTftt AH AH ACCUiAfi AHO TIU IliMi^KTATICN Of IHrOfHtATfON AS IT AfffAtS TNfS OATf QN tm tfCCi^ Of THI NCI#€PIN COUNTY OffAUrHIHT Of MOPt%%Y TAXATION, TO Tl^>CSf Of HV fNONlfDGf AND HfUCT ^ a A . • < A ai^—€g J »«i •1 • 1 «. . I Ml •1 » i«fli fv^ci ftif JSL\ '-///- pi- y P (» / A — • 1 “".r* 7>1 • ^ !•« \V r •nsMSk MAM UMAM^M 1 <d ?•Ci Oi < CL CL C.4 X VJ X ri Ci <•t ^ -M lli a 7iST «A»«tt A _O Jj L'' C.MVPf(V4jk tlkNi •.Uct 00 ® PRO(»OSED U)T LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR MICHAEL PLANK IN LOTS 2 4 3. BLOCK L MAPLE PLACE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOA Utt2Miis.iiMki.MAru ruci. nofooBujaiL - ^«^^*^iMi«witttti<fi4—mmi ittpArMiiUiitttttMMsriiair Hhi, Mi t4 ^Mtt sTU^att^ Mtt> Itt* 4^— sflH m K iMM n iki JZl* tt MMMUll.tti laMsHlirtHtti TlttpMSsfU ll.llMkl.MArUftACE^ SJIm utllttrw'**** Si2L*M2*^^^ IM « K 1mm HUMmIMV tt BkMM M 1» IM» MMi Ul I MmMUiI.i Im sttlMfr «fli I MmMUIS.Imm«mi MlltLMttttttvi , ttttM4| luskfttt Com\ & GRONBERG. I\C. L .'“ •/ifli'l . f Ll>ht '>IH 't ' s,*' /''--'Sf I.IIM.Ii.Kk VvriMK • I ,|V.( \1\ M: 4'' 4141 I hr«P« rHji din <«(«•« •»«« pnfw«d M Mr •« w»4n «N • M« jwdttM l<M« A»N wMMiwiL wd t wpwM» <wJ I jiM Si ttr U-< .4 *• SUM- ^ SkwM »4< LU*i s l<rtOTT«t| Miiti ■«!« (•iiw IJTtt I UAH 11% % AMMM ♦I A45 • •m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik ft Associates iC tm • mm pf I pf • Cmm Pf I Mi^ Pf a pf m iMp cpp pf p# m tp^ P CP c pf t M pf P IP« Pf m mmm Pf Pf • ^ engineers A Architects Febriury 5, 1993 Mv Jeanne A. Mabustti Buikiing and Zofimj AdminiOrator C'lfv of Orono P 6 Bet 66 Cr>5tal Ba>, KIN 55323 Re: Mkrliael Plank File No 139-1800 p « am 3 CmmOmm Pf MfP IP D«ai Jeanne; We ba\e teviewed the site san^' tor the proposed tot line rearraojreinent for Michael Flank ta Lots 2 and 3. Block I. Maple Place l^ated south of W’aterto^n Road in the southeast quarter of Section 31. W'e wouM recommend easements be provided to the City for drainage and utiiit> purposes akmi; the proposed lot tine AI<o. because more detailed infonruition is now known about the property, we would recommend increasing the si/e of the draihafe casement in the wetland area to the approximate limits of the 939.0 contour. The proposed casements are shown on the attached sketch The existing drainage and ulilitv easement that traverses the north half of Parcel A should be vacated at this time. The area of the easement vacalmn b shown on the attached skefeh^ Easement descriptions shouhl be written for these areas and forwarded to the City Attorney for preparatkjn of the legal documents to be signed by the property owners. Please contact me at this office if you h.ivc any questions. Yours vcr%' truly. BO.NESTROO. ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. SDG li 139A.cor 233S ti^t Highway 36 • St. Paul. Mfoacsota 55113 • 612-P36-I600 • LBQAl,r>F ]^2«d Loi2,«idtt dMchb«d h lii—w of: m.50 6«t ■ad nid liast E«tia Httlpwtof ■Miiti onto QfWMiolOD poifll io Mid d*m*M 23 ti AA r lO: DATE: 5. Planning Coamiissioii Members Ron MocHse. City Admimstranw FEO^t: Jeanne A. Kf^nstiu BoiMinf and Zoning Aifaninistraior February 11. 1993 SUBJECT: #1803 WoodhiU Country Ctuh. 200 Woodhill Road Preliminiiy SubdivUion Public Heanng PeniATiit Ori imtt Cliapter 11 Specifk (Kti VI Chapter 11.33, Subd. 4 (Exhibit N). Scctioro of the Coniprehensivc Transportation Plan (Exhibit O). IJa of Exhibtts A • Applicatit» B - Plat .Map C - Property Owners List D - Piaimmg Commission Minutes 3/19/90 E - Council Minutes 5/14/90 F - Map of Properties Served by Drivewav 0 * Giffron Memo It - Proposed Site Plan 1 • Declaratjon of Covenants, Easements. Restrictkms dated 12/Sd j • McNellis Letter plus Sketch K - Gustafson Report 2/4/93 L > Engmeer’s Sketch M - Staff Sketch N • Section 11.33. Subd. 4 O - CMP Sections P - Prcliminar>' Plans History of Property In 1990 Wixxihill Cixintry Club filed a 2*lot subdivision af^Iicaitun with the City that involved Outlet B of the Woodhill Ridge plat, refer to Exhibit B. Tte division involved the creation of one residential lot and the remaining properties designated as ouilots. The existing private driveway would continue to serve Lot 3. Woodhill Ridge plat (McNellis residence), the Prudden residence (the former John Pillsbury homestead) and the proposed new residential UM (refer to Exhibit F). Zooiog File #1803 Febniary 11. 1993 Page 2 The original subdivision apfilieatioa (1503) «its tabled at the CoancO oKcting of May 14, 1990. refer to D and E. The ma>or issue for that review was whether the rc»l was to be ififnded to a private road and if h>. where was the cul-de-sac to be located within the roadway. The adjacent neight^ vend major concern as the culde-tae wtiuld have major impact on her property if pbeed at the southwest comer It was Woodhill's piwifion that the ro^way did not need to be upgraded but the two property owners (McNcllis and Prudden) »rvcd by the road requested upgrading to a private road and that a cul-de-sac be installed to the east away from the roost affected adjacent neighbor. Couocd tabled the application to provide the City, applicant, affected property owners and neighboring property owners to work out an agreeable arTangemeni whereby neighbors needs would be addres»d and City's (g dinanccs safisried. Review ctf Coin II 1 The cuTTcni subdivision proposes a residential lot. an outloC for future development, an outloi for private it»d with cuFde-sac and an outlot over the wetland low area to the s<»ith side of the private road The residential kx meets the required 2 acres in area and required lot width of 200’ at the 50’ setback from the road. The private road wniot with cul-de-sac is platted along southern part of and the northern extension remains as a driveway %rvii^ the Pitakkn’s and Mc.N’clIis’ residences and the proposed residential lot (review Exhibit H). Septic As loi b proposed in the same configuration as the original, the septic testing provided for Application #1503 is still accepuble. All conditions set forth by Gaftron in that review will still be required, review Exhibiu G and H. Note Gaffron requiml a 50’ setback downhill from drainfield test areas for all construction or tmproven»nts. The lot will be a dinicull lot to develop and requires intensive planning before the final bouse location and house design is resolved. ilUxessAJpgradins of Curreol Roadway As in the eariicr application. Woodhill asks the City to delay requiring upgrading of the current private driveway until an additional unit is added. They have platted the private road outlot to the north lot line with cul-de-sac. The cul-dc-sac is <n the vnithwest kKation. Members may remember the objections of the adjacent neighbor concerning the impact upon their property. Several m.mirr rrres wiHild have to be renKwed if a full cul-de-sac is installed in the area. Review the covenants (Exhibit I) created in 1986 that govern use and upkeep of the pfivate drive. The covciuius address lla issue of maintenance and approved level of users by both Woodhill Country Club and Pnakkns with future subdivisions of the properties. Wotnlhill Zoning File #1^ Fdmiary II, 1993 Page 3 00 respoos^ilit> for the repair or maintenance of road until residential lots developed ffora Outloc B. Woodhill Rjdge. «rre lo be »rved. Based oa tbe directives of the covenants, the one lot within the Woodhill Ridge plat (NkNctlis lot) and the Pmdden property were to have opial dare in the maintenance atid upkeep of the mad. It is not clear as to what Woolhiirt share in the cost of upkeep wMutd be. refer to page 2. item 2. It appears that Woodhill win only share in the cost of regular upkeep and mainieiance if a club use is to be insalkd off roadway. At the time of the Woodhill Ridge subdivision, the Cii> allows the private driveway to remain because there were just two users. Review Exhibits N and O tbe City code requires a pnvaie road al 3 residential units. Tbe real issue is what degree of upgrading will be required and the extent of the upgradii^. Review Exhibit J. Mr. NlcNellis has sibmined an updated letter presenting his piwitiofi. He advises that Mr. Prutkkn takes the same position. They feel that the road should be upgraded by Wocsihill at l»st along the lower southern portiocn where the road has never been improvGi. Mr. McNellis relates serious concerns with curreM condition of roadway and asks that rather tbaw impacting the neighbor lo the unroediaie southeast that a simple backout apron in the southwest comer be installed rather than a complete cul-de-sac which would destroy all existing mature vegetation. Review Exhibit K, the Cii> Engineer ’s Reviewr Comments. Gustafson asks iha» the lower southern roadwa> be upgraded to a pnvaie road with complete cul-de-sac in the southwest comer. Gustafson also notes that the extensioo mad to the north as proposed would have to mnain a pnvate dnveway rerving just twro residential units. As already noted in this memo, the proposed Woodhill lot will be served ft the northern boundaries taking advantage of the more gentler slopes so three units will be served from the private drivxw^y portion. Review the sketch of the City Engineer, Exhibit L. If the northern portion of the dnveway was to ever meet the standards for a private road, the road cxitloi must be realigned so the road can he installed at an accepuMe degree of slope (no greater than 8% to 9%). Note the road wiwild wipe tnit the proposed building site and require the realignment of the eastern Kn line. Proposed Outlot B consias of severe sloping topographies and it is douNful whether the property could be residentially development based on currenl rural standards It is the potential development of 8 3 acre Prudden property that creates the n^ to develop a private road corridor to the north. A private road cannot be con-structed within the northern portion of the proposed road ouUot. This is the only time the City can plan for a future road expansion to the north. If will be too late once Lot Ts lot lines are defined and a house located on the property. At a minimum the road must be upgraded along the southern portion. There must be a turnaround of some type at the southwest comer, at the base ot the private dnve iwrthward before its steep extension to minimize safety concerns during limes of bad weather. Can the City legally allow the northwtrd extension to remain is a private driveway serving six lots? Refer to Exhibits M 1-2. the sketches sIk>w the road iHitloi realigned and platted lo m>rth lot line. The current developer would install private road to jH>int where pnvate it Zosiag Fik #1803 Febniary ii. 1993 Page 4 propcfty will recpiire the insullatioa of the rc^ outld to the north boundary and the rennvall of the fonner drive and backout apron. The City wouki ask for all affccicd propertv owners served by n>adwa>s to execute standard cosmants dealing with equal shares in upkeep and maimenance of K»th private road and temponry private drive. It may alsti be necessary to define that it will be the obligation of the future developer of die Pnidden property to develop a private road from the point at which the private road has been installed by the current developer. RecommeiMlnCj To approve the subdiviskm appikatioo of Wixxihill Country^ Club creating t>nc residential lot mating all required standards of the RR-1B Rural Residential Zoning District and On-Site Septic Code subject to Che following conditions; 1.No grade cuts 50’ downhill from septic test sites on Lot 1: no grade cuts 20* laterally lat a level equal to sqitic site legations. This would mean no structures or driveways shall be locate! within defined setback areas. AR)licam to grant road and utility casements over private road! ouilot. 3. Applicant to gram coiBervation and flowage easement over wetlands areas to \x shown 8$ drainage easemeMs in Outlet C. Applicant to pay park fee based on assessor’s determination of the fair market value of 8% of land being developed that would have been conveyed for park purpose. Options of Acthm CmKcming Private Road Location and Required Upgrades with this Sobdivisioa A. Placement of private road <xitIot 1.Per applicant’s reqttost the location of private road to be approved as shown on preliminary plan by Sathre, Bcrgquist with the cul-de-sac at southwest comer. Existing paved road to north to remain as private drive scrv ing a potential of six lots; or 7 4te> •To require the road to be realigned as sc orth in stafTs sketch for private road. Surveyor shall also realign the east lot line of Lot 1 to assure 2 acres contiguous dry buildable laixls arc letained. The house site would be moved further cast to the higher elevations. The driveway to Krv'C I ZooLfig Fik #1803 Fc^ruan II, 1993 Pages proposed Lot 1 may now come frum southern portKm of private road raOier than from the nonhv^csf aectkMi of eaivtif^ private driveway (if frooi the northeast, the driveway would be 350' l«^). B lired II i«T •rovemefla; 2. Per applicant's request we require no upgrading at this level of use and to require installation of private roK) at time of fiitme subdivisloa. Appliom’s covenants must state what the shaiv in the cost of that: upgr»!iiig wiU be for all property owners; or Require paved private road to be installed per rural standards per stafFs sketch. Exhibit NM. Require a backcan apron in the sraithwest coriKr and to minimirr the removal of any mature trees. CITY OF OFOKO • SUBDIVISION APPLlCATICm n s ■41 /SO 5 fl- FBOPBtTT LOCATIOH Slt« Addream ifan,* -mamj. Property Identification Nunber (P.I.D.) Please check one - Property *abstract or i 2-117-2M2-0010 torrens? Bun Attach legal description to application. APPLICAMT Phone (h ) Kaaie Phone (work) 473-7113 Address: 200 W»adll Basd City:Zip, SS391 UMHSli (if different than applicant)Phone (hosM) Nesie SMK Phone (work) Address:City:Sip* (attach list if more than one) SZISTISG LABD OSB Niaber of Tax Parcels Development Size 14.S4 2.80 17.34 Present Use (check) 1 CITY OF am FIimE OfFICf 1350200000 01 HEM 300, OC kcT*, Total, .11 R..l<J.nti.l, no. of Other (specify) Acres Dry Land Acres Ket Land Present Zoning District Ht-IB iBOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Lina Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) 1 Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sitesi ^noe GMl Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Hininum Lot Size: CIS Units per 2 Acres 87.120 Sq Feet Dry BujIdable Land Proposed Use: (check)Residential Other (spec I g iTv w w ■ii i4Ti n/»/n BBtoni coKrr PCTtirr■T»•4TOI Ml ri9ATce ■/ n t2-ii7>n li msiMtM MOMim mwoMXU coiirry cm MDOpiuL cunrr cm »M moomu m mrztik m f9i*i WrOPJItTlgl STSTL**s ti&f» «-ii7-nuVtatUS M IMMUIM VMimS « IMMMJIM ItM CMm» HUL MT7«T« m »S«1 MMBT MOi. ri«l< r<Gi 1Ml M*117-tS IS MM MUI HQQtMlU M J Mirmt • • MATflt JUiMIH « UCHii Mims m Noopim MMi miZAUi m sufl rntm/um St tt-iir-n IS MSM Hooemu. m j Mtmt • • Mtnit JUIMiM • MCMl Mtmt sn MDQtnU IM9 MVCAtA IM MISI St M*lir->s IS Msu famu ■ • • STSMMMf • « STtfMHU WUMCW SIS MOMMUt Ml Htfur* m Bin n M-117-n M MM MSM tin tmti • Stt OMW OMWiMI M mtZMtk m 1SS91 r r OM«t MM! rtxMvct MM UBH fAXPiVIt mx/um C ’ r MM MM OM«t NtW TAMPAYCI i/I M M-n/-rs t% cmt KntMiiL tm t N I low At* Pttua H L UMB ICM HOOMnU cvc MtVZATA m UStl St tt-iir-n n m • USt ttCMMCM t itMiM m Mm rmtat h warn AM ST pcm ST tr ptM m Miti St M-117-tS SI MSt tlist BiaOBON ST J ■ SltCtCU I M StMMU jam ■ sttcMu icn tlCRtlCON ST MtVZATA m SSStl St tt-llT-tS SI QtSSt Rcnc AVC MUCA MOTORS INC KARS IHRORTEt MTOS t!C ISSM MAVZATA tlVt HUtCTCMA m SSSAS SI M-ll7-fl M tU«« HOOOnm AVf CAN Mill CMMitS H A NARtA C MAUI IZM MOOOHUl AVI mrzAT* m »s*i tZ-117-ZS SI MQS JSSCU AVC t CARRCNTCt RMIM • CARMMliR AST tAM RU5SCLL AVf* NAVZAtA m SSSAl n tz-117-n z« MU MSSt HOMMIll Ml T t fCMUtS A • J MOCUIS TMONAS I NCNiUIS SSi NOOMIU M NAVZATA m MSTl M M-117-ZS fli tlZM tICKCNSCH ST M A N MM.RSON nCK t A HANCT L AWCCSOH |ZO« OTCMNSON ST HAVZATA m BSSl St tf-117-fl B1 MAT OOASO ORONO MCMAM M S lOHAM H Mm lOMAM N Ntm AM ST pcm ST ST PAIR, m SSIOI M tZ-117-ZS SI Mt7 tltss BICICNSON ST N J NTTIOM iTAI. HARioM J Mmorr ITS9 OtCMMON ST HATZATA m SBSTl u iz-ii7.fl II smi MSST RUSSCU AVI J > NCAiPIN ANN NCAIPIN jom p A racNiUf n hcai pim MT tuum AVI HAYZATA m S5ST1 M iZ-lir-ZS SI MAt Aim OICRENAON ST i H TOIMD TRUSTCf Na CS7 SASU M VOUNO IZZO QICRCNSCM ST MAVZATA m SSSTi ifc 00o DO . mm Mfiiift8 Ml mmm mTAIMfftmm/m n n-iif-n %i___fctm ofTY Mc un mtm MKMA MU UC » MM IT m ts itsfn tf-iiT-n u Mti •MM auniit iM tqCMfi • MiKTYn IT u mrtMiii • Mitsfiiti I •mcci j ooiiSTin »M MMU AM MTUTA fii SSSfl In ii-iir*n %t•ItM ItCtMOM Mills mt IHMiM JACKSON lit IT U • I • K H JACKSON lit IMS f»NOQt HIU m M\r/AfA »Si Wist fMP . •miM TAWmO i/m OMNIS HANC TAMMAYfM l/i ammm mm TAMMAVftl M AC •MM WQMIU n M • iiVIMC • • A Aft?AO •OKAiO USTM A UMT ICVlNi HU •• sun M Of^IlT-n St lOOOf •••M AOOMSS UNASSII T«i ntUM co»nviicf III! STM ST S C •iATf llA NKS Iti Sisis n ti-iiT-n AS Mts •iiM rtMOAit •• m worn S RINQNAH Ji Cf Ai MMIT A NAMliVM All IIM If riMALl M MAYtATA m SASSI M •t-117-fS At •loss (KCNOn MllLS M AM# I AM lAMSai SIIO60B lOAS fOGtMQOi NtUS ■• NAYtATA m USfl n tt-tir-fi St Mil •OtM AOOOfSS UNASniMt HDoOHUt cammiY ciui Mpomiu CMfTMY CUft too MoooMiu m NATZATA m sun Si ft-ll7-n AS MtA • HAS rCMMOAII 00 M MAOifT C OGWAN II OOAOllY c 0010001 II iiAi nmoAii n h MAY/ATA m SSIAI M Of-llf-CS At OMSO AOMSS WASSIOHl tot NATIM CONSCOVANCY NATW COeiOVAWY isn STM ST s i IMTi lU MOiS I0« SMIA Si Ot-llT*tS AS 0011 fltof SNOOfllM 00 OQNAiO 0 SAMAil JO OONALO 0 OAMti JO itoi OMoofiiNi ooivi MTZATA m lUfl fOfAi OATCO ^HL il cy 1 cnnrT tut t« tacts ktkschtio tm m accuuti am mm HC mcscmtatioh or iNronmnoN as it amau this oan on tni ! atctwo^ nr TW MCiMTIM COUNTY MTatTXNT Of TMTCiTY TAXATION. TO TNI MST or NY TNOMiiocc ANo tuicr. oaTtJ*Ji~ IflSr aisuns or the match if. 1990 planning cormissiow MirpiMC D ATTWDAKI 7x02 Co«iii»»ion a«t on th« aOovo d*t« with th« foUoiJng «^Vr. pr.^ont: Chairman K.ll.y and Planing coMiationar Bro%ra, Hanson and Johnson. Tha following tha City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mlbunr it.i^ant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron and c!w i^cordVr'^S^^ Council Raprasantativa Nattla. was prasant. as wara CounciImamfcara Patarson and Callahan. 11503 inOOHILL COUIIT7 CLUB 200 MOOOBILL ROAD PRELIMINART SUBDIVISION ^ _ Crt.fic.t. of .1.1110, -.r. duly notad. Mr. Thomas Bargquist of Sathra * Bargquist. was ptaiant on bahalf of Woodhill Country Club. zoning Administrator Mabusth providad ^^Jrait2 tha proposal by WoodhiJl Country Club for a «nl 2^ ^ra lot. Mabusth notad that dua to t.ha craation of this ISSltronol 10^ th. City i. ..tin, t-l.t tn. tha axisting two rasidantial propartias ba upgradad to a roJd ii^h a 2V pavad width. Mabusth said that tha City is also raquirxng a 50’ road outiot with a cul-da-sac ba includad. MS. Josaphina Carpantar. 480 Russall Avanua. was concarnad about tha location of t.ha proposad cul-da-sac. Mr Thomas M^Nallis. 355 Woodhill Road, said, "Tha Pillsbury n=u.. bt“\ in iVlO.' A ro.d ,r.v.l to.d ... »«[ th. y..r. it ... oll.d. Th. ro.d do., not hold up .» ««1I pavad surfaca would." 1,. c«rp.nt.r infora.d tn. Pl.nnin, Conai..ion Jb*' ‘h* b..n uJinrtn. ..Ltini .inc. tn, prop.tty ‘J* nothin, le,.lly docum.ntin, tn.t. W. h.v. ,lv.nr.Tiirhuty.-%n% s .’of Lt;to.d «: ;otVn?;v..r“.. .110. ‘;rtn;tt:«i t'?L“*of our ro.d. Th.y c.nnot ,.t up th.ir ro.d in tn. .1 M.bu.th ..t«l if th.r. n.. b..n . n.ed to do thi. .ince Pruddans bougnt tha proparty? M.. crpent.r r.pU.d, "No, and wa haven't had a bad winter since that time. «.bu.th recoll.ot.d th.t .. p.rt of th. th.t p.rc.l of l.nd, th. u.. of th.t driv.w.y ... to e...«. - 1 - D jfIKDTES or HAICB 19, 1990 FLA21NINC COSO«I5SIOI3 REmtlC ZOHIG riLl ilSOJ-fR»OBILL COUHTIT club CORTIIfUCO Ms. Carp«nt«r indicated tfi4t ch«y put * f*nc« up b«caut« th«y v«r« tired of having traffic uaa thair driveway to get to Woodhill froM Orono Orchard and Fox Street. She said that she vas not aware of the City's requirenent to that eliminate that access. Matusth asxed Hs. Carpenter if the formal access to her {property was achieved froa Dickenson Street. MS. Carpenter indicated that is correct. I4r. McNeills asked where the Country Club la proposing to place the access to the new lot. Mabusth answered that inforaaticn pertaining to the location of the new driveway has not been submitted. Mabusth indicated that more than likely the house would be constructed to take advantage of the views from the higher elevations. If that is the case, Mabusth said the driveway would probably be located where the City Engineer it showing the cul-de-sac. Ms. Carpenter expressed concern regarding the location of the cul-de-sac. Ns. Carpenter also noted that the property line for this parcel extends over to her side of the road. She said, “It will be interesting to tee how this will be resolved. Needless to say, we would prefer not having sosiebody own the south tide of the road because we have been aaintaining it for years. Are there any plans to move the road further south?" Mabusth stated that the City is requiring- Woodhill to construct the road and expand it to a 24' width. Mabusth saidi that the City can request that the road be placed further north because of Ms. Carpenter's concerns. Mr. McNellis asked at what width the cul-de-sac would be constructed. Mabusth replied that the cul-de-sac would be platted at a 100* diameter and City standards require 80' for the finished diameter. Mr. McNellis asked whether all would need to be removed. trees within an 30* radius Chairman Kelley replied that every attempt is made to have ar little impact on the trees as possible. Mr. McNellis stateu that any tree removal that occurs for the construction of the cul-de-sac will have an impact on the Carpenter property^ - 2 - HIIfUTES or MA*OI If. IffO fL^NiailC OWSilSSION Himcic XORIBG riLX ilSOJ-liOOOailX coontxt clot cohtiicuco >ubu#th •aid tnat th«r« la no doubt that tna cul-da-»ac will impact tfta Carpantar proparty. Mr. targquiat itatad that Woodhill objact» to tha City'k caquait of turning tha axi»ting drivaway into a road. Tha axiating driveway aaaefflant la currently 31* wida with 1ft’ to 20* of pavaawnt. Woodhill faala thia ahouid ba adaguata to aarva^tha oxiating and ona additional proparty. Bargquiat aaid. Tha Country Club bought tha Pillabury proparty to kaap tha antranca way in its praaant fors without having aoiRO other developer in there. They would prefer to kaap thia under control by keeping the property in thair ownaramp. Tha ona new lot that they are creating ia off to tha waat of the antranca road quite a bit and •hould not diatract frow what tha Country Club ia trying to create on tha entrance way. wa feel that widening tha road aa propoaad by tha City would take out quite a few traaa for tha road itaalf. Tha turn-around would taka out a treaendoua anount of traaa and require aubatantial grading. Tha City Engineer* in bia real to protect tha City, wanta a road created where Woodhill wanta a country lane. Woodhill* at thia txaa, haa no further Intantiona to aubdivida the remaining property." Mr. McNallia opined that tha future owner of tha new lot will want to praaarva aa aanv exiatlng treaa aa poaaibla. McNallia fait that -n order to do thie* tha property owner would opt to park on tha street rather than construct a driveway. McNeills was concerned that due to the street width* any on street parking will create a road block. Mr. Bergquiat did not expect on-street parking to occur on a frequent basis. Thera were no further coaaants from tha public regarding thia (Batter and the public hearing waa closed. Kelley explained that two of the Planning Commiaaionera present this evening were menibera of the Woodhill Country Club and would therefore abstain from any diacuaaion or voting on thia matter. waa JBOved by Kelley* seconded by Johnson* to bypass any further diacuaaion of thia matter by the Plwiiaing Coamiaaion and have the matter go directly to the City Council. Johnson asked whether it was appropriate to request a site plan or building footprint with a Class III subdivision. Hanson felt it is important to acknowledge woodhill Country Club'a concerna about tn* "country lane atswapnere** and the possibility of future variance requests for this property. Hanson stated that he would object to any variance requests. Motion, Ayea-3, Hanson* Nay* Motion passed. ■1*1 I - 3 - r m HitfUTES or OHOWO COUNCIL SttETISG HELD MAt K# 1990 20SINC FILE 11502-HILBELINK COMTIKUEO Naya-0, Motion #1503 iroOOIIIlX COUNTRY CLUB preliminary subdivision . Ccun-ry club Raprasantativa, Mr. sttfit., Engin««r/Surveyor, v«r. *11 pr.»«r.t. I "w w ^ ^ - K,-4-fiv •xol*in«d tna history of th« proparty Barnhardso -ybdiviaion. He elto inforaed Council if i^I?f•:^.c"<«o.nd*cio^^ -'>• I-'-" CU1*4€-1AC a cook r.pU«<l t-.*t ch. cul-de-.*c will *«tv« •* .round *nd t.rainu* foe th« ro*dw«y. turn- w 11 mf-Mt-rnd. that Noodhill was under the conception Mr. to upgrade the road until a fourt.h that it would not He said that it is the desire of property was . currant roadway pattern at this time. ”::^!:t“l 2i* -uim * to do tn*t *t tn. ti« ootlot A i. developed. J i“iat the City would be willing to exploreBernhardson stated that ^th. ext^ platting a cul-de- the option of uoorade to occur at this tine,sac without requiring the upgraaa :r”/. 'S';C::S ‘S'“F3™;“ road oStlH A. Mr. McS.lll* infotm.dnecessary, it be locatea ^ .arvino his property was council that tn. portion ’ .. • functional engineerad in »uca •> **y drainaceway would b* destroyed tr«:’«S^r.rV \«.»d -n’er,"at.ff i. proposing. the n“?Sbor;**"nd" WoVdAuf w^JrwUn^.taf"* to%e\Vr»inV’wb«.'':^: should bs plscsd. MS. carpenter asked that further consideration be given to the necessity of the cul-de-sac. It was moved by Mayor ^2^9 ^1990^Cou^tlNettles, to table this application until the May 29, 199U coun - 0 - k' H (rriTOTES or o«o»o coobcil mrrisc hilo mai 14, i*»o lONlSa PItl n503-WOOOBILL COO^^T«T CtU» COBTIBUED .Sn, “o'ioB, •1508 OOHALO 0L50M 4590 HOETH AEM OEIVE CQffOITIOBAl* OSl PIEHIT Rzsourticm |2800 Mr. *nd Mr*. 01»on pr«*«n- City M-lnl.tr.tot i.raH.rd.oo 9.v. . bti«t .tpl.n.tion of thm OlEon'* application °h*°in^*i*P«ra*e for'Vh^ Vo ••Id* ts« h« did ?«« tno P*.t*"d <»«* con.tcuct . .nod. that aha concurs with tha Counello^r PollOM r.g.tdlng tho :S;^::tod'Tair*.Vca'V condition Oo"incocpor.t.d into tn. PoJolutlon »pptovin9 thi» .ppliction. propacty. Patarson. to .^iitar fce providad for tha horaaa by language that * »• ® tnaitar by that data, tha Octobar 31. 1990. If Motion Ayaa-5, Naya-0. Hoticnhorsaa *uat be boardad alaawhara. Motion, ayaa a, v / passad. •1509 EARL PREEMAM 4545 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE Neither Mr. Fra r.or a rapraaentatlve waa praaant City Adminiatrator Barnhardaon statad that Coosiaaion had raiaad * . to alio« ti»a for tharaaolvad. Ha auggaatad tabling the raatter applicant to addraaa thaaa concerna. Mabuath aakad for to giva Mr. Fraamanthe Planning Coraniaaion’a racomaendation t g until June 15, 1990 to claan up the property. It waa novad by Mayor Grabek. aacondad by Councilmambar - 9 - • •fllttt.tfflttVttf. ft 'Hi IK'« I \ 0/ . k--N^^?rs-.; 1 i! El! i* \>!;'“-'- ’*'= ”** |5.^^ I i^MrTcpr^-*;^ I p'tV \‘ ^2 = .•§•••«!■?. lat ■* •'*•'• -/-• V /O 7“--------—— ■ ! ^ ® I t »ff « iMHAtf t A « i»« i««f| *«• « *111 4| • •«« M« n«« iO* |*«1 *•(• ' aNi — mmrt m mkt amIM »tmm *«4 PK At rj StIELT 2 (M> a tl«ET8 (S' <fOi raoHi DATBl J«ann« A. Kanbuath, Building t Zoning ^dainiatrator Michael P. C«ffron» Mat. Planning & Zoning Ad*4niatrator March 13# 1990 Sabieott «1503 Woodhill Country Club - Subdiviaion - Septic Tearing I have reviewed the aite of the proposed building lot and would Bake the following cocacentai 1. The tearing for aeptic ayates drainfield sites by S-P Testing indicates the use of a trench drainfield svatea on 2 terrace levels at the north east corner of this steeply sloped lot. The tested sites provide the capability for as nuch as 950 lineal feet of drainfield, enough to provide for a p.iaary ayateo and nearly 2 alternate systeas for a 5 bedrooa hone. 2. Since these sites are at the high end of the lot, one would expect aone under ground drainage following the contours down the hill, with 10% of the lot having slopes greater than 181, it would be critical to avoid placing the house directly downhill from the drainfield sites. Purtheraore, it would be advisable to do no grade cuts within 50* downhill froo any of the drainfield sites, and within 20' laterally at a level equal to the sites. Because these slopes near the drainfield are so steep, it would seen to be within the authority of the septic code to require these special conditions on site grading. 3. To that end, I have sketched on the S P Testing design, a 'protected area* in which no structure and no grading or cuts should occur. Based on the preservation of this area and the stipulation that no cuts occur, I would recommend approval of the building site, finding that the provisions of the septic code for a buildable site are adequately met. \3SI43 >«*0« I K5* _____ 5*Cl '^i \, ~-3fV~ it US I ____X \ * • Ut r%4 -.- - -*L- ry^—-;Jir-+,-|.----; ► ••♦ mm \ • m z'/f “ 5. c S •/ 12/9/86 ■j: DECLARATION OF COVENANTS» EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION is made this 15th day of December, 1986, bv Woodhill Country Club, a Minnesota corporation ("Woodhi11")? John D. Prudden and Stephanie Prudden, husband ana wife (the -Pruddens"); and John S. Pillsbury, Jr., and Katharine C. Pillsbury, husband and wife (the Pillsburys ). Woodhill, the Pruddens and the Pillsburys are hereinafter occasionally referred to collectively as "Declarants. RECITALS The Pillsburys have entered into a (Contract for Deed (the "Contract for Deed") with Woodhill in which Woodhill has purchased a tract of land of approximately 34 acres located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described on County, Minnesota as Document No. » anc in .he Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Office as Document No. 1714972. The Pruddens are the owners of a tract of land of aoproximately 8.36 acres located in the County of Hennepin, State of Min.nesota, legally described on Exhibit B (the Prudden ”) # which is conti5^^'^s to ths Woodhill PropcTwy. Declarants desire to subject the Woodhill Property and the Prudden Property to various covenants, easements, and restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarants hereby declare that upon the recording hereof the Woodhill Property and the Prudden Property and any part therein shall be transferred, held, sold, conveyed, and occuoied, subject to the following covenants, easements, and restrictions, which are for the purpose of protecting the value end desirability of the Woodhill Property and the Prudden property and all parts therein and which shall be binding permanently on all parties having any right, title, or interest in the same, their heirs, successors, and assigns; shall ^^vre to the benefit of each owner thereof; and shall run with the land. 1. A non-exclusive easement is hereby created in favor of the Prudden Property for driveway purposes (including the right of access for such repairs and maintenance deemed reasonably necessary by the owners of the Prudden Property) over that portion of the Woodhill Property described on Exhibit C, (the "Driveway Easement"). The Driveway Easement shall be 33 feet in width and is limited to use for three lots on the Prudden 1 1_ _ _- —-^hm I ■■ Iirriii I Ti iniri^irW Ain» lots on the Prudder. and ,• s ■'ini ted to use for three k-o=er-.v each cf which shall tae used solely dor sinsle family residential ourpcses. The present use of the detached garage 0--S on the Prudden Property nay continue until such s*-ruc*ture is either torn downier substantially renodeled at whic.i residential ourpose restriction wi^l aoolvr^wSJdhlil'rise of the road 'cccstructad on the Driveway.he sincle fanily Ea'senent shall be United to serving (i) two single family of the Woodhill Property to theresidential lots on the portion north ir.d west of the Prudden Property (the "Northern Residential Lots"), and (ii) the portion of the Woodhill Property -o the south of the Prudden Property ► WUUUAl-L JL, / X U.3 J W V. w ^ - -- - - - tcay to service a building or other inprovenen residence on the Woodhill Property in which e^ maintenance costs of the portion of the driveway on -.www-..*-- Propertv shall be shared equally by the users ’ In Lking such calculaticns, (i) all a.*he‘p‘>-uddenshall be considered to be one user until such time as ^ne i'-ucaen - pnv DortioH thcreof is owned by nore than one en^iwy usage by the Kortnern k Paragraph 7 below shall The owners of the Prudden Property or any portion time, shall be permitted to enter upon the ,rim trees, at the expense of the owners ofat the expense — - - - - - on the Woodhill Property to the Prudden Property (as f the Prudden Property to •-•4-on*- *-har such trees are to the the such trees - - imming shall be 1 done only cn these portions above 1C37 feet and at time reasonably acceptable to Woodhill. The owners exercising such clean up all trinnincs and debris and shall exercise due care in connection with such activities on the Woodhill Property. rights shall 4. Perpetual easements for the benefit of the Prudden Property for the maintenance or replacement of electrical, gas, and telephone lines as presently located and legally described on Exhibits D and E are hereby created which easements include the right of access for repair and maintenance. 5. No structure, temporary or permanent, nhall be constructed on the Woodhill Property within fifty (50) feet of the easterly and southerly boundaries of the Prudden Property. For purposes of this paragraph, a structure shall not include a drainage field or other septic system w’hich is either underground or slightly elevated from the ground level; provided, however, that any such system will be properly maintained and landscaped to blend into the surrounding environment. 6. No portion of any improvement constructed on the Woodhill Property to the south of the easterly 496.45 feet or the . BA BA. .A. ..A £ \a 1 Prudden Property (as measured from the southe-st corner of the Prudden Property to existing judicial landmark) shall be constructed above 1037 feet above sea level. 7. A non-exclusive easeire.nt is hereby created *n favor of Woodhill, its successors and assigns, for driveway access to the Northern Residential Lots utilizing the driveway the Driveway Easement as it exists, from time to time, rrom Woodhill Road to the Prudden Property and a new driveway to be constructed by Woodhill, at its expense.in the portion of the westerly 75 feet of the Prudde.n Property as described on the attached Exhibit F hereto. Such easement permits Woodhill to construct a single driveway access to the Northern Residential Lots which access shall be limited to serving two single ramily residences on the Northern Reside.ntial Lots. In the event a building per... .t is issued for the construction of a building on either of the Northern Residential Lots, the lot for which the building permit is issued shall be deemed to be a user as contemplated under the provisions of Paragraphs 1 and 2 above. 8. The Pillsburys are entering into this Agreement solely for the purpose of subjecting their fee interest in the Woodhill Property to the terms of this Agreement. 9. The provisions of the Contract for Deed relating to the above easements, rights and restrictions are hereby ter.minated, and the provisions of thi.s Agreement shall apply. k State of Minnesota) ) ss. County cf Hennepin) The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me this I 7 day of December, 1986 by John S Pillsbury, Jr. and Katharine C. Pillsbury, husband and wife. ~1 ^'7^ Pk ^ M ^ ' * " * ( This instrximent was drafted by: FAEGRE 6 BENSON (T.MC) 2300 Multifoods Tower 33 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 •S'TMr**''-*1 rJ^CSSY. JR. ^ NC *. • *.!'NN£$0IA i : V-•V- HiNr:-. county ^. X My &A>»rct Noe If ^ 4#<<<»»>*#»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»# ----- I r r • i-i Dl-i wA-r - ,^w.^ Ur > -- - - - - Lots 11 and 12, "Auditor's Subdivision Nur.ber 307, hcnnepin County, Minnesota", according to the plat thereof on file and ot record in the offices of tne Registrar of Titles and the County Recorder in and for said Hennepin County, except the following portions thereof. Except that part of Lot 11 in "Auditor's Subdivision Nucber 30( , Hennepin Counr.', Minnesota", described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot 8 in said Auditor's Subdivision Nur.ber 307; thence East along the extension of the South line of said Lot 8 a distance of 46.5 feet; thence North parallel with the North and South center line of Section 2, Township 117, Range 23 a distance of 352.61 feet to a point in the extension of the Northerly line of said Lot 8; thence Southwesterly along said extended Northerly line a distance of 49.83 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 8; thence South along the East line of said Lot 8 a distance of 310 feet to the point of begiruiing. Except that part of Lot 12 in "Auditor's Subdivision Nur.ber 307, Hennepin County, Minnesota", described as follows:^ Beginning at the point of intersection of the Northerly line or Lot 3 in said Auditor's Subdivision Nur.ber 307 with the North and South center line of Section 2, Township 117, Range 23; thence Southwesterly along the Northerly line of said Lot 8 to the angle point in the .Northerly line of said Lot; said point being 25.5 feet east of the r.ost '.Vest- erly comer of said Lot 8; thence Northwesterly 32.2 feet to a point 204.74 feet Southwesterly frc3 the point of begi.nning; t.her.ce North easterly 204.74 feet to the point of begi.n.nir.g. Except a triangular tract of land in Lot 12, "Auditor’s Subdivision Nueber 307, Hennepin Cour.t%’, Minnesota", described as follows: Beginning at a point in the dividing line between Lots 3 and 12 in said Auaitor's Subdivision Nunber 307, which point is 4 1.1 feet northerly from the Northeasterly corner of Lot - in said Subdivision; thence northerly along the dividing line between aforesaid Lots 3, and 12 a distance of 78.9 feet to an angle point in said dividing line; thence at a right angle easterly along the dividing line between said Lots 3 and 12, a distance of 57 feet to another angle point in said dividing line; thence southwesterly in a straight line 97.3 feet more or less, to the point of begi.n-ning. ..AT r; W ‘ HiirtllliftiT (c Paee T*^o ;o:'n9r!s?-n ALSO Loc 10, ‘Auditcr's Subdivision Nar.oer 30T, Hennepin County, Minnsso.a , Ixr.eot that tart of said Lot 10 described as fallows: Beginning ^ at the Southeast corner of Lot 8 in ’Auditor’s Subdivision Nunber aC., Hinnepin County, Minnesota”; thence west along the South line of said J.ot S a distance of >8.4 feet to a Judicial Landmark in the North and South center line of Section i, Township 117. Range 33; thence South along the North and South center line of said Section 2, a distance o. 114.3 feet to the- Northwest corner of Lot 9 in said Auditor’s Subdivision Nunber 307; thence East along the North line of said Lot 9, a distance of 95 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9; thence North parallel ^ with the North and South center lirtt of said Section 2. a distance or 114.3 feet to a point in the extension of the South line of said Lot 8; thence West along said extended South line of said Lot 8 a distance of 46.6 feet to the point of beginning. All of Lot I", "Auditor'.*. Subdivision Number 307, Hennepin County, .MinnesOwA , Exceot that part described as follows: Beginning at the aost Norwh- westerly corner of said Lot 13 (which comer is also the .Northeasterly corner of Lot 1 ov said Auditor's Subdivision!; thence uast alor.g whe North line of said Lot 13 a distance of 25 feet; thence South 15/..5 feet; t.hence West 25 feet more or less to the East line^of said Lo^^l^ of said Auiicor's Subdivision; tnence .North along said uAst line 157.75 feet none or less to the point of beginning, all according to the recorded plat tnereof. iiWiirtlinLiTii ( r r \* • r: • n ^ ^ ^ ^ V» A « A ■» ^ «» W • ^ m • % -^T.-« V r\^• ^ •' • crr*r^**^ A 33 foot eases’cr.t for rcaoway purposes across that part of Lots 11 and 13, "Auditor's Subdivision Nur.ber 307, Her.r.epin County, Minnesota’’, the center line being described as follows: Cor.nencing at a Judicial Lar.dr.ark on the southerly terrinus of an easterly line of said Lot 11 shown as being 680.60 feet in length on said Auditor's Subdivision plat; thence on an assured bearing of .North 0 degrees 3A ainutes 29 seconds West along said easterly line to a Judicial Lar.daark on the northerly teminus of said easterly line; thence South 39 degrees <8 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 330.88 feet; thence South 77 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 782.49 feet; thence North 0 degrees 44 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of beginning of the center line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 44 minutes 50 seconds v.’est, a distance of 107.iO' feet: thence Southerly a distance of lcS.66 feet along a tangential curve to the left, having a radius of 231.64 feet and a central angle of 41 de grees 43 minutes 08 seconds to a point of compound curve; thence Easterly, a distance of 147.32 feet along said co.mpound cur'.e having a radius of 105.00 feet a.nd a ce.ntral a.ngle of SO degrees 23 minutes 19 seconds; thence North 58 degrees 38 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 138.S7 feet; thence North 65 degrees 37 minutes 3S seconds East, a distance of 72.69 feet; thence Easterly a distance of 205.55 feet along a ta.ngential curve to the right, having a radius of 647.44 feet a.nd a central angle of 18 degrees 11 minutes 24 seconds to a point of co.mpound curve; thence Easterly, a distance of 322.36 feet along said ccm.pcund curve, having a radius of 1260.00 feet and a central angle of 14 degrees 39 minutes 31 secends to a point herein after referred to as "Point A"; thence Southeaste.'ly, a distance of 104.10 feet along a compound curve, having a radius of 135.00 feet a.nd a central angle of 44 degrees 10 r.inutes 57 seconds to the east erly line of said Lot 11 and there terr.inating. Together with a 33 foct easement for roadway purposes across that part of said Lot 11, the center line being described as follows: Beginning at aforedescribed "Point A"; thence Northeasterly a distance of 52.74 feet along a cur*.-e concave to the northwest, having a radius of 110.00 feet a central angle of 48 degrees 18 minutes 21 seconds, a cho~d of 90.02 feet and a chord bearing of North 74 degrees 19 .minutes 23 seconds East to the easterly line of said Lot 11 and there terr.inat ing. he sice lines of -the abo\ e described easements are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate at the easterly line of said Lot 11. I ifln ■■ iliTfci .1 r r mm «h:b:t e 4^ — Ds».»^r'.«C‘.^ Qr L- .—.'j4 An casencnt for utility ourooses across the east 10 feet of Lot 13* "Auditor's m • Subdivision Nunber oO", Hennepin County, Minnesota”. An caserent for utility purposes across the east 10 feet of Lot 12, "Auditor's Subdivision Nusber 307, Hennepin County, Minnesota" which lies northerly of the following described line: Co.nnencing at a Judicial Landr.ark on the southerly teminus of an east erly line of Lot 11, "Auditor's Subdivision Number 307, Hennepin County, Minnesota" shown as being 680.50 feet in length on said Auditor's Subdivision plat; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 34 minutes 29 seconds V.’est along said easterly line to a Judicial Landmark on the northerly terminus of said easterly line; thence South 39 degrees 48 minutes 42 seccnds ’.Vest, a distance of 330. SS feet: thence South 77 degrees 04 minutes 07 seccnds West, a distance of 833.63 feet to the easteriv line of Lot 6, "Auditor's Subdivision Number 307, Hennepinm ^ • m County, Minnesota": thence North 0 degrees CS minutes 54 seconds ’.Vest along said e.'isteriy line, a distance of 115.52 feet to the northeast corner o: said Lot c; thence North 29 degrees 24 minutes 09 seconds East, a distance of £30.47 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 73 degrees 01 minutes 31 seccnds East, a distance of 347.73 feet and there terminating. , ! liTtiJlIITiiftiiilBliifi J »I L>f ■ III! ^. ACRSiy-iN'T AMEN’DING DECL.AR.i.TION' The Uriel'sijr.sd» isir.j 3ll of the DeCiaiar.ts under that certain Declaration of Covenants, Easements and Restrictions dated DecemOer i3, 1986 and recorded with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on Decenoer 1'., 1986 as Document No. 1784723, and with tne Hennepin County Recorder on Feoruary 24, 1987 as Document No. 52J1034 (the "Declaration") hereby agree to amend the Declaration, and do amend the Declaration, by substituting Exhibit F at-a-hed hereto for the Exhibit F attached to the Declaration. In all other respects the Declaration shall remain in full force and effect. IN AGREEMENT, the undersigned Declarants have executed this Agreement as of July 27, 19B7. ^‘WJD TAXES PAID C* L ?USUC KICOrOS TnAN'S^iR ENT'REw 10 1967 • CC3jT/ IMN'N. 1 =’jTf 0 Katnarine C. PiilstrcTy b STATE Or KINSESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) m The foregoing instruT^er.t was acknowledged before rr.e this Icay of July, 19B7, by L. V. Ack.’nan, the Secretary of Woodhill Country Club, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Puolic tr DIANE M CLARK % % e STATE OF MINNESOTA) % ---------------------------------------------------------------------- j % not AAV AUSLIC * MiNNCSCTA # ; ,'J«j HENNEPIN COUNTY • ) SS.V *»T fc*Ot,«* J»w 11 H' j COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) •** • • Tne foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this y I day of July, 1987, by Jonn D. Prudden and Stephanie Prudden» husband and wife. Notary PublAc STATE or MINNESOTA) ) SS . SHARON ANN BRAUN HENNEPIN COUNTY COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ^ day of ^jri;^^^1987, by John S. Pillsbury, Jr. and Katharine C. Pillsbury, husisana and wife. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Lindquist & Vennum (JBW) 4200 IDS Center Minneapolis, MN 53402 THOMAS M. CROSBY. JR. !; NOTARY PUBLIC — MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY l*y CommiMaon Eum Nov Ift. ttt2 J 2 xr\u ^ n ^ ^ r k* 4% * * ^ imJ aki « ft DRIVEWAY EASEMENT (PR'JDDEN PROPERTY) That part of Tract A. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. ISYS, files of the Registrar of Titles, described as follows: b Deg inning at the southwest corner of said Tract Ar thence north along the west line of said Tract A, 115.52 feet to the most westerly, northwest corner of said Tract A; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Tract A, 75.uO feet: thence southeasterly at a right angle, to the intersection with a line 75.00 feet east of and parallel with the west line of said Tract A; thence 'south along said parallel line to the 'south line o said Tract A; thence westerly along the south line of said Tract A to the point of beginning. « • X, . f .* i*- nfSiTiiiinTii Tom & Roberta McNellis 355 Wcodhiil Road Orono, MN 55391 (612) 746-4556 February 4, 1993 Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator City of Orono 2780 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55391 RE: #1803 Woodhill Country Club Subdivision at 200 Woodhill Road Dear Jeanne: We will be unable to attend the hearing on February 16; therefore, we are sending our comments in writing. Enclosed Is a map of the illustrating what we will refer to in this letter as Part A (In yellow) and Part B (In green) of the driveway affected. The driveway leaves Woodhill Road, heads westerly (Part A), and then up a steep incline headed northerly (Part B) to serve the McNellis and Prudden residences. 200 Woodhill Road would be the first driveway on Part B. This exact proposal was submitted on March 14, 1990, In application #1503. The concerns that we expressed at that time still apply today: 1. The subject property would be served by a private driveway that currently serves the Prudden & McNellis properties. During construction on the McNellis property, completed in 1990, it became apparent that the private driveway from Woodhill Road to the McNellis property was inadequate for the heavy loads construction requires. What appears to be a blacktop road is, in reality, a gravel driveway that has been died many times over the past 64 years. The driveway is adequate for automobiles and light delivery trucks, but broke up badly during the McNellis construction. We had Plehal Blacktopping, Inc. repair the damage and restore the driveway to serviceable condition in the fall of 1990. If heavy construction trucks are driven over the driveway again, severe damage will .occur. I have enclosed a piece of the driveway to better illustrate how the roadbed ! 1 • Jeanne A. Mabusth February 4, 1993 Page 2 was constructed. This piece was obtained from a section which broke up during the McNellis construction. If you were to strike the piece with a hammer, it would disintegrate. If vou were to perform the same test on regular asphalt, the piece would remain intact. The sample, as you can see, is made up of multiple coats of oil and pea rock and has very little strength. The depth of the roadbed is from 1/2" to 1 1/2" thick. 2. Although the entire driveway was constructed by multiple oilings over a gravel roadbed, Parts A and B differ in condition. Part B of the driveway is on a steep incline and drains water. In addition. Part B is slanted to a concrete gutter that further drains the rain water and melting snow . Because water never sits on this section of the driveway, and because of the underlying soil conditions. Part B is n good condition. However, because of the steep incline in Part B, during the winter storms, many vehicles that are not 4-wheel-drive have become stuck. The problem area starts at the curve where the city has proposed a cui-de-sac and extends up the hill. Several times I have had to abandon my car at the curve. I have been able to back my car into the driveway that connects the Carpenter property to the subject driveway. This area is currently adequate for parking one stuck vehicle, getting the vehicle out of the way so that the driveway can stay open to other traffic and the snowplows. Part A of the driveway is too narrow for cars to pass each other without one going off the driveway. (The driveway widens at Part B to an adequate width.) In addition. Part A runs between a hill on one side and a wetland area on the other side. When this section of the driveway was constructed, drains were strategically placed under the driveway, allowing the massive water runoff from the hill to run under the driveway to the wetland area. The driveway has sunk over the years and the drains have become buried causing water to sit on this section of the driveway. The south side of the driveway has a berm that was caused by dirt washing down the hill over the years. This berm acts as a dam to further hold the water on the driveway. When this section of the driveway is wet, the roadbed becomes soft and breaks up easily under the pressure of construction vehicles. 4. Another home Increases the potential need for emergency vehicle access. For this additional reason, the width and condition of Part A of Jeanne A. Mabusth February 4, 1993 Page 3 the driveway needs to be considered, to ensure emergency services can be adequately provided. Chubb Insurance Company Insures our home. They informed rr>e that if we were to have a structure fire at our home, 15,8CX) gallons of water would be needed to extinguish the fire. Wayzata is the 'esponding fire department and can only bring 1,750 gallons on 2 pumper trucks. Since the hydrant is 3,200 feet from our home, Wayzata could not pump directly. In addition, they do not have tanker trucks to set up a relay system. Upon confirmation of a structure fire, mutual aid would be sumnioned. Long Lake would respond first with 2 tank trucks (2,300 and 1,850 gallons) and a 1,000 gallon pumper truck. It would take about 13 minutes for Long Lake trucks to reach our residence. Additional tank trucks would be needed from Maple Plain or Minnetonka. Easy access can be critical in such a situation. in summary, with only the Pruddens & McNellises using the driveway, the driveway is adequate for such low traffic. By adding another family, guests, more delivery trucks, etc., given the weather conditions that are guaranteed each Minnesota winter, and with tiie potential for emergency vehicles needing access, a very real problem exists. We believe that a fair and common sense answer to this subdivision request should include the following ideas and specifications: To require Woodhill Country Club to rebuild Part A of the drivevy^y to an adequate width and to 7*ton capacity. At the curve, design should Include an innovative way to park vehicles, if they become stuck, so that the driveway could stay open for other traffic or emergency vehicles. The design should leave all major trees and a vegetation barrier to the Carpenter property. Part A should be raised and drains placed under the driveway so that the water run-off can drain to the wetland area. The drains should be placed so that the increased run-off that will be caused by the increased hardcover of the proposed residence will drain. 2. At some time In the future, if the Prudden property is subdivided, the logical place for a cul-de-sac would be at the end of the road, which would place it at the top of the hill on the Prudden property. This should be specified. 3. Assuming that the driveway entrance to 200 Woodhill Road would be from Part B of the driveway, it would go over the gutter that currently ! i Jeanne A. Mabusth February 4, 1393 Page 4 handles the massive water run-off from the Prudden property. The design of the driveway entrance needs to address how the gutter would stay open. The design should consider the volume of twigs, leaves, and acorns that drop into the open gutter. The debris would easily become lodged in the opening under the driveway entrance. Therefore, the opening needs to be large enough and the owner of the driveway should agree to keep the drain open. 4. Wood hill previously agreed to place a declaration against the new lot to provide for subdued outside lighting similar to the restrictions which are presently against the McNellis lot. This language was negotiated by Bob Mitchell. Woodhill also agreed to confer internally as to what provisions they could make available to assist in fire protection. We would like Woodhill to readdress these issues. During the summer of 1990, the City Council referred this matter to the McNellises, Pruddens, and Woodhill, to see if we could come up with a solution upon which we could all agree. At that time the road was broken up from our construction. We were anxious to put the driveway back in serviceable condition before winter, and offe.'ed to contribute the cost of the damage and additionally share In the costs of upgrading the driveway. Woodhill’s President, Thomas V. Markle, agreed with the McNellises ’ and Pruddens ’ recommendations and sent us a letter confirming the same. The hang-up occurred when Woodhill was unwilling to pay what the Pruddens and McNellises felt was their fair share. McNellis repaired the driveway and It is f^ow perfectly adequate for the McNellises and Pruddens. If Woodhill withdraws this application there will be no need to upgrade Part A of the driveway . Therefore, we feel that if a subdivision is desired by Woodhill, the cost of upgrading the driveway should bo their cost. Jeanne, admittedly it is difficult to fully describe the points listed In this letter. Roberta and I will be returning to Orono on February 22, and will be happy to meet with any Interested party to discuss this matter personally. Cordially yours, Thomas E. McNellis cc: John & Stephanie Prudden 1 /’0}wf '■ •.V V'!•* %\/^ 4T.'■ y0 \\ \ nVi w / ^ 10*0 .y \ N f 5;iM) .s ' V> 71^ ~ - ivi lis^/ ».‘ J , /^ // 7 )'.CKEr>!r>or4 uo t 1 A V- L. 1 10 3 rn c ^•^07 - V 07 r.i r-T ^ • 1 r- X> 1 - 0s n 5® /^- ^ptu3 # t 60ft^tame^r ru^-MeoykM ' B^'Buur /^ 4^^ Ouri0fB^< ' 09 ot/nar c 499 Syopf^fo^o 09 9£f\MT7£0 F49 BPt4£%,rs(%). ^0 ?r*> ' C-fj^o- o vr-‘ WETLAND ( 2.8 AC.» \ \\ \ \\ ' *. 0 / .'^x- f y / V ' \ X \'- t \A># LEGEND. Part A Part B / C0 \ r-CiiS^x< Bonestroo Rosene AndertlkA Associates Engineers & Architei s OnoG 9L»9mx) W •bsfnf Pt • joscor C Mjrw L Von,#i P£ 9k^>jI0 £ Tyme* 3«nn t Coot, E Noyen <»£ •DOrt G k'Hirucrt. P£ ksjn M ftwftn. C PA 'Senior CorM*r« Moifrjid A SjtAmi PE teen t Go<oon Pf f ewt?ry. PE OJviO O LOStOU. PE •nete»T C •btiee a i a A Boutoon, P£ VU't A ^jnjon PE r R#uc*njnr. P£ IPd t Pet5 PE Tnomof t Arx»non A • A OonoiO C eLK-SAA* PE ^nom« E Angus PE <ynie« Marnr«r Pf tAcnjer P K»u Pf Agnes M tmg A iC P Tncvnjs vA Prenon PE C U'xn Pf jSryei t Pf Jenv O PponcA PE tenn««» P Andprwr Pf M^ri, 9 9t>PV PE Mj'fc A se© PE Gjtv vA Monm P£ Ojnpe j Ecigrron PE Oyy « tricnpnmjft Pf PPiHp J Cawnpe Pf Mom O \lfMn P£ M«m ■ jpnion Pf L Pntip Grpwpi «. Pf tj*en L \A>-npfi Pf c>> D t'*«<yt2 Pf F '5txw Poue* Pf teen » vaoo Pf 9^JMwn D Gustjfior Pf Cecrto OKe» Pf CnjfiM A E*n.t^ Leo M PjMeiSty Hjrtjn M 0«n Jjn^s E fngetsjAt Febru?rv 4, 1993 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Buildir.g and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Bo.x 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Woodhill Country Club File No. 139-180.3 Dear Jeanne: We have reviev^'ed the preliminarj' plat for Woodhill Ridge 2nd Addition on the Woodhill Country Chib property. The proposed subdivision will create one residential lot and two outlots. The area is curreath' split by a bituminous drive that serv'es three lots. TTie City Code allows onlv two lots to be served by a common driveway. To develop Lot 1, Block 1, the existing driveway must be upgraded to a standard private street. The topography of the property prohibits the construction of a standard private street to serve all four lots, and it is not a feasible option. We recommend that the street be constructed from Woodhill Road westerly to terminate at a cul-de-sac near the west plat boundary at this time. The street should be a 24 foot wide roadway with 8 inches of 100% crushed Class 5 aggregate base and 3 inches of bituminous pavement The cul-de-sac should be 80 feet in diameter. The proposed alignment is shown on the attached sketch. The existing driveway would connect to the cul-de- sac as shown. No further subdivision should be allowed to the north of the cul-de-sac, as only 2 lots are allowed on a common driveway. If further subdivision is planned to the north, the roadway should be constructed to meet the 30 mph standard for a private street. This alignment is shown on the attached sketch. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours very trulv, BONESTROO.' ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson SDG:li 139A.cor t 2335 Wfest Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55f f 3 • 612-636-4600 \\' N jl \ 'V LV ') X \:4^1 // / // »*• * ■ / \ \ \ •' ✓ \i ✓•✓ ✓ fe:'// r \ / % \ X/’✓; '^\y' %/ N hA /N k i \ V-- .-•r^X' ^ ^ ^ ^**^*-» ^ •v. / / }80> 0^S /•// \ •'S. *N >4 ^ V‘{\'/4/:2o - A/d9*5J*/o"£ 52.20 M24*08’5‘/‘W / *.y' \ 1 / 0>o°Xi I5 (.j-i 5i^ /■ •■> /'T-..»■» / V :■ ■; ■>. •:> .:-r> X \ O . \ Mi '"H ■ ■• .: - ■ • ■;»• r:.- A rflif •;’-.1'-"' -V, -r^*'-- X ^WETLAND* ::;i •« \ \ \ •i ^msim mWiM (2.S AcjtiSSS:m 5k •■ ir ’ » '^■•y '' • •y.'.’ \ // / / • ■/ \\\> \ ■ c M ^ I». L_ I Vl O W I VI .O » I \ l_ L. \ k?k: i N l x ' ^ • ■ / isti ^ ^ y > • '^ • ‘ .:■M •;•■ ■ A. 4- : •;•■ V -SP c '. •<‘- ■. ■•'■ '.,<■ ■. :•. . .* * ' 'XV / / / L\\ >> X .r X'!..y v.( N ✓*r-fV i* \ >\/• \w ••••#•••.X ■>/ .,a '■J^:. '■ ' ■'* ' ' ^ i y''—----------------------Sl^'V r----------------------—......j^1 \ // wx. ^N^rgjFT v>x.-irr. I "“... -...-....—IvC^ ____________________________ »/a\9 |'.\ ^liiTsSf s/?ff?aa^{±31'},<K 1^ ■0)^ ‘1 f0;*5 “X 1 \L \1 ^l^ > yr \11 ^H • j£^ 5^ ' A ra:\ / 4^"'vy' J' ■f-, 'i\9: s - ''A/a9*53'/o*'E ^52.20 Mzro6‘5iVi .- 5 ^y.(. S& / /y^M .<'. t^\ / v:> \ ■X i V - ^ ■ ■ .:'S^-'X i::v^> y . \ ■ ; ■ ^ j,<i-,-, ; . ; i ?,■-.:<■ ' •;■ ■;■ %LV« ■ 0,/ \ \ o ✓ /•>/ j (n' / IWETLANDi Ip' \ \\ \ \ > : ■.-• . V-. ; V. / I •/ c M ^ I .CivloVy |\1 Q"^ QC C T“ O \ »A I- L- \ s V ;”?.. '• ■; : ••jfi ¥ <r V • >v;: ..v> ., '. j. V . . /<:' • •;; I :.S• V ^ :-^. iy^.4v^' '\y / / p /-^\A- .^Ikarr^- . ■fcLM I«< <1 ■■li i n "iliiMaillW i ^TlTlttia ■ li ■ ■ i ^-.vr.i M*rr^r>iT^^fL j.rt~-.k>>< ' -.-f<rrMflAn>WlU««B laj t ^ -MIMikr-. OF«W^«iAr '-..f, .'Ti \M\\s.\.*•/^>5i3 X,/30(>’^'//y////' , .y• .••/:\✓ « A V fc •• ^ 11 \\ yj' y..'y.y y:y\y.••r'f.»*• Vt-V —^2^'I ►•-' .y‘ .- X’ \i »' ^- \ «. • • • •‘ k • V: \' \ 'SS!y\Tx/ /y/x^ y<i ,47// '//'/■ . \ N ; 'nk • • »’ ».,. ■'%. y y. ' 1\ TJ CITV^V.'K V> s- ? • :W. y- '» :.*f. '*‘39 7^-'^7 NvV 'jrao: /a: 7^•.» ■* • .«. \V/f:zo '52.20 Mzro8*57Vi / / / 'v^ \o TOr« '■“C 0^' \ ,:Siiiifei%t . 1'/.' '*'V^ • •^;y■v^■<v:-r.-r r-<t-.7:;V-,;■-. .■r I h § { \ y /%p4 m £> ■■' a f\ / / ' < •*■; '• .V * O •\ M) /’J:/ /.o^A / \ \ \ /C* / \ \ \ /\1 nr ^J o IV1 vL.|\i0^7 |\l <C*»' QCC-r I • A C L . I ^ 1 A\ \\ 5 \ \ >—*' I. / y 'V r-: <s • -'4 / n S 11.33 D. Intersections shall be designed with a flat stopping area of at least thirty (30) feet in a residential area and sixty (€0) feet in a commercial or industrial area. The stopping area shall be designed to provide a maximum grade of two (2) percent. E. Where any street intc»'section will involve earth banks or existing vegetation inside any lot corner that would create a traffic hazard by limiting visibility, the subdividet shall cut such ground and/or vegetation (including trees) in connection with the grading of the right-of-way to the extent deemed necessary by the City to provide an adequate sight distance. • P. The crown of all streets. Including intersections, shall be three percent (3%) or less. Subd. 4. Typical Section. The typical section indicated herein is as determined for a Clay Subgrade (A-6 Soil Classifica tion) and may be subject to change. Soil borings may be required to be determined by the City. Private Street - Residential Units 3-6 R.O.W.* 50' M.P.W.** 24' Over 7 50'28' Public Street - Residential Units 3-10 R.O.W.* 50' M.P.W.** 28' Over 10 50'32' Section 8" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface 8" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface Section 8" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface 8" Class 5 100% crushed 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface Maximum cul-de-sac length - 1,000' Maximum number of units on cul-de-sac — 10 Public Street - Commercial or Industrial Units 1+ R.O.W.* 70' M.P.W.** 32' Section 8 * CXsiss 4 8" Class 5 100% crushed 4" 2341 Bituminous surface * Right-of-Way Width ** Minimum Paved Width ORCNO CC 462 (4-1-84) L 0 JUNE, 1980 jp|^|a<^PORTATIQM SCENIC PARKWAY Scenic to those by the CitxTT-of iJd e'ironLntally significant roads which is typically a narrow, curvy, slow areas of the City. The JLal areas and special vistas speed road which provides throuah traffic and commercial traffic o? .c.nio .ttr.ction.. High ,.s«. do not benefit ie not aporopriete on physical nature of the roadway is not from the attraction ^^,,^-^„ovement. Because of environmental conducive to -“i-l'”: ”:”"t into higher capacity sensitivity, scenic J g'^^ithout adversely affecting the natural collectors or minor and/or the property rights of setting, the scenic quality natural topography of the area, abutting landowners. Because f traffic and local access scenic parkways also provide functions of both local and collector stree 1 JURISDICTION: COUNTY OR CITY right-of-way WIDTH: 50-66 FEET Kis-f. «i-reeta that function to provide TJITAL STREETS. Local streeca street, carry traffic within direct access to abutting proper ‘ tstween neighborhoods. Inter- “i’tJonfeit; ”JJ:=tfr*Str«°trarrc:ntrolled by stopping the local street traffic. JURISDICTION: CITY right-of-way WIDTH: 50-60 FEET ;KA0-EHD= length will be LI.M1TEO BY PUBLIC SAFETY CONSIOEBATIOHS ^ a orivately owned and privately maintained PRIVATE ROAD A private road is a a^lanned development, that road, l^ated in the rural ^ Jh^ City will require that private functions as a local t^Jity standards! The City will roads be constructed and egress and access to all properties s:rtre f^-/”:;rLr”:!r”nii?e^%"°":iva:: rLdi* b: !S:at:r““i".?tid’'o::iots intended for joint and several ownership by all the benefitted property owners. e.r.Fh/'Ta'TTnM WITH UNDERLYING EASEMENT TO CITY ■ ■ I i ■ ■ TRANSPORTATION JUNE, 1980 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY A driveway is a privately owned and privately mainta. vehicle path between the street and private property. Private driveway: shall be subject to access permits according to the classification of tl abutting street. private driveways will not be subject to any public easement or access right, but do require recorded private easements whei driveways cross an intervening private lot between the residence served and the street. JURISDICTION: PROPERTY OWNER MAXIMUM SERVICE: 1 RESIDENCE TYPICAL; JOINT DRIVEWAYS ALLOWED WITH MAXIMUM THREE RESIDENTS PER DRIVEWAY IN RURAL AREI MORE USERS REQUIRE PRIVATE ROAD STANDARDS DRIVEWAY WIDTH: WILL BE REGULATED WHERE MORE THAN ONE USER IS INVOI OR FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES WHERE THERE IS EXCESS LENGTH BETWEEN THE RESIDENCE AND THE PUBLIC ROAD EXISTING ROADWAY MAINTENANCE JURISDICTIONS ARE REASONABLE AS THEY RELATE TO THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN. The State of Minnesota has appropriate jurisdiction over the only Intermediate Arterial in the City. The Hennepin County Department of Transportation has jurisdiction over the only Minor Arterial designated in the Plan. It is anticipated that Hennepin County will assume jurisdiction in the future over the City- built ring route link between County Road 19 and County Road 6. Hennepin County has jurisdiction over most of the designated Scenic Parkways which is appropriate in that these roads serve as access to Lake Minnetonka and to County maintained landings for many County residents who do not reside in Orono. The City has jurisdiction over those Scenic Parkways that are away from the immediate lakeshore, including the access road to the Orono Golf Course. The City has appropriate jurisdiction of most of the Collector and all of the local streets which serve all Orono residents. Certain key stree segments have been designated for Municipal State Aid construction assistance, including; OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD from County Road 6 to Fox Street, County Road 8 WILLOW DRIVE from Ccunty Road 6 to State Highway 12 and from the Long Lake border to Fox Street FOX STREET from Willow Drxve to County Road 146 McCulley Road (Ring Route link) between County Road 6 and County Road 19 Finally, individual property owners have appropriate private jurisdiction over those Private Roads serving only their individual properties. CMP 7-17 BdiW TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator DATE:Febniary 10. 1993 SUBJECT: #1796 Peter W. 1. L’AUkr, 2684 Lydiard Avenue - Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Zoning Di^rkt, LR-IB Required area = 1 acre or 43,560 s.f. Existing = 28,452.52 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.24, Subd. 3(a). Conditional use permit required for non-rental/gucst apartment within residence currently under construction. Section 10.22, Subd. 2, Hardcover review. 500-1,000’ setback area = 28,452.52 s.f. Allowed = 9,958 s.f. or 35% Proposed = 6,754.5 s.f. or 23% No hardcover variance required. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(c). Lot coverage review. Total area » 28,452.52 s.f. Allowed = 4,267.8 s.f. or 15% Proposed =* 3,278.5 s.f. or 11.5% No lot coverage variance required. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Hardcover Fact Sheet E - Survey F - Elevation G - Second Floor Plan H - Front of Principal Struemre 1 - First Floor Garage J - Second Floor Plan of Garage Approved with the Building Permit K - Second Floor Plan with Request for Kitchen/Eating Area L - Skyway Elevation I Zoning File #17% February 10, 1993 P?ee 2 Descriptioii of Request A building permit was issued to the applicant on 11/30/92 to construct a second story addition with decks to the existing residence. TTie former garage was taxen down and replaced with a new garage with permanent masoiuy foundation allowing for a second story addition for living quarters for applicant’s parents. The principal structure and garage/living quarters are to be connected by a 5 ’xl5 ’ skyway. Review Exhibit E, F, J and L, note the second floor plan approved with the building permit does not include a kitchen nor eating area. Review Exhibit G, H and K, the principal access to the apartment is via an open tloor area on the second floor leading eventually to skyway entrance. Revtiw Exhibit I, a secondary access is via the main floor of garage. The new apartment will contam one bedroom. The total area of the apartment unit is 8% s.f. Note the code does not limit the area of the apartment unit. The principal struemre is approximately 3,300+ s.f. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the access through primary structure meet the intent of the code? Does the skyway access to the apartment present any unusual concern? Options of Access To approve as proposed or as amended. Note any condition of approval must be conditioned on apartment never being used for rental purposes but must remain for the exclusive use of family members, guests or domestic help. All other required standards set forth in Section 10.24, Subd. 3(a) will also be applicable. I . ^ ; a ‘3 - ‘^ j / ^ •JrV*CITY OP ORONO -• VARIANCE APPLICATIOW^-* ■« i« t i M t / • V .*^r' A y ■» •::^0 Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Penewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ilVi OF finance office f T?A ''/VVWV) 4 VVW^ 02 CES 2 75. •'hECS TL 275.i (jCrCTuT^TuAIJL i V V f*H iI I UW :o/Vi rAM cai ti^ W‘V'V'4 MV'i f4w Af/1 ^ 4 * PROPERTY IHFORMATIOH Site Address iMV {’KlCp . Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 3/-//7-^.^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired 1 j _ _ _ __ (month/year) I (doX^oo no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present'TlSeof property: >• 'residential _ _other (specify) Zoning District: LR-lR_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ V—■ APFLICAMT Name Address Phone (home) V 7 I _ _ _ _ _yj'"^^ t'a _ _ _Phone (work) ~7 : L\V\^fin City; ____ Zip: 5sS3 1 VARIANCES REQDIRED _ _ Lot Area Setback: Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Front Side X Other (specify)_/ Rear Average Lakeshore 7^ BARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTION OP ONUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:_ _ _ _ _ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS t:he follcminq information must be subaitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered coapletet a ^ 1» Completed Application Form .r 2._v/Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center .348-3271). ^ 3.J/_Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). V . fV4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include ^ .. hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*i”xll" for .V, reproduction ). ^^6’ ___Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). iZ._SJcetches or plans of floor t elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll*) •___As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not cyplete If the information haa not been included. APPLICAHT'S SIGHATURB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator^ agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this a^p^ication^^nd certifies that the information supplied is true and correjstT^o the^^^j^t oi his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ? ONNBRS SIGHATURB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the ocoperty by City staff» consultants, agents. Commission membe^^s-T'^ind Coun^i^l members for purposes of investiga tion and verification .df tlUs reotiMt. Owner's Signature Date /''!/)— ^ ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Coandssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. —**>»■**Itli mjH OATI 01/04/nMTCN OOZPfiOP ADOR ONNCR NAME TAXPAYER HAMi/AOCMI PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP ADOR OIRCR NATC TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR » MENMEPIli COUffTt PROPERTY ri»^»aTION SVSTlH PROPERTY ONNERS UST REPORT NO. PI41S401page a jSa EO-117-ES lA 0002 02615 LYOIARO CIR MICHAEL L GUDERTSON ET At MICHAEL L ft KAREN CILBERI^RI 2615 LYOIARO CIRCLE S EXCELSIOR m 55S31 sa 20-117-25 16 0005 02625 LYOIARO AVE DAVID 0 VICKIRMAN ET AL DAVID 0 VICKERMAN 2625 LYOIARO CIRCLE EXCELSIOR m 55SS1 sa 20-117-25 16 0006 02655 LYOIARO AVE J ft J DERG JAMES BERG 2655 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55SSI .J SB 20-117-25 16 0005 02650 KELLY AVE JULIAN HOOK ET AL JULIAN HOOK 2650 KELLY AVENUE EXCELSIOR IM 55551 sa 21-117-25 25 0050 02660 LYOIARO AVE E G FREESE ft J P FREESE ELDON G ft JOANN P FREESE 2660 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR rtl 55551 50 21-117-25 25 0051 02660 LYOIARO AVE JOSEPH A MR02EK JOSEPH A MR02EK 2660 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 J 50 21-117-25 25 0052 02606 LYOIARO AVE P N T ft J M L'ALLIER PETER H r ft JENNIFER N L'ALLIER 2606 LYOIARO AVE EXCELSIOR rw 55551 50 21-117-25 25 0055 02700 KELLY AVE m 0 RICE IDO RICE RICHARD 0 ft DEBORAH 0 RICC Z700 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 50 21-117-25 25 0056 02710 KELLY AVI LEE R MUNKELH1T2 LEE R MUNKELH1T2 2710 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55551 ccJ 50 21-117-25 25 0057 02760 KELLY AVE JOHN G MUIR ETAL MRS PHYLLIS E OMALLEY 2760 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR rtl 55551 50 21-117-25 25 u355 02720 KELLY AVE CATHERINE HANSON MEAGHER CATHERINE HANSON MEAGHER 2720 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55551 TOTAL BATCH 002 00011 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST V OF tU KN0I4LEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE m rr / /' / • f /,T HARE COVER CA.LCuLAT 10*1 nc.i SET3ACX zone : (Clr.CLE CHE) 1 j^sSHEET ^^75-2250' 250-5CC7 SGO-IQ Existing Hardcoveh in Zon ^ House length width _____ X .— 3. Garage c. Driveway • D. Sidewalk_322 e. Patio/ Deck F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING ^VTS.S s.f. S # r t . S.F. m 0 - S.F S.F. Uc -z:7c^c> S.F. C?_ S.F. S.F S.F. S. r S.F S.F O S.F a— S.F S.F. s/urAjPtA//i»S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. Total Property A rea in Zone u Q 4 *7** . CCi>. ; D .r ^c V .. L ^v$2>' A I / 7^^^ 4. IT X IQO 1 j aflNSAV QHViaAl <mi n (J) O 2 ‘V O 2 J>o 0 oajnuw 1 !0 S 1 ^ i^ P tO Zpr* •-?.n» m hiM-"r2 *'i'» o %"? • . 5 •'' • * :i: [•1 OJ o ^ •• c.) •NOTTnUb O Xm 2 2m29 2 Ooc 2 2m t/) O Only coploa which beor on embosaed aeol ore certified copio OF £fU!Z)/E'V »»——veawryT THAT tm Kim iwiawfl> now ewMM«t WAS MVAUBD >Y M on UNOCII MY nuCT YNAYI V* A eULY MOirmao IW« or YMi tTATO e# MOMCn Z.Z /I /E^ IZe5>ID£Kj0 £ Of^OtJO . fJ\K] . MTV M<UtTfUT10M MX . i "If o m fit 1> O * f • i I ! I »>- K • 4-70ftO ^---- xur (Nua yt t^c tJ» PC N»TMi> AJ *<fC IPIXi SB UIIC WMI tcca NIO AITC s»iff ^ CCHAl T r r Be w I >0(0 taUfO _ >4(0 •-------u^V^cr------------ UStMJi. ASPUiyfC It^cs £ } 0 AI10i( K* % if ^ ^/^4i ■pORCff t'^aSr*' rvf 4 4* O MASTER BATH / C.T. cnx j^UlttAU MASTER BEDROOM _____U________ir <r 0^ as..'A)z nil ec' f wi \ H4* 'ni »nMp 40OC r 7 RA r-y ^ *»\ teoJL ' &i / . /. / / j ------------- / / DSOC SITTIMG ROOM r-6* m __ / MUt L I — L----------* i/mfliuLU^ ‘ i n #u n43) XM^xm \ ST/ yjCH WSW ^<C WIN. at least one H/GUAROaM* ir-r flff 44 ’.(7 fUfUd EXISTIMG IWm ROOM BELOlU NOTE' © 0E9GTJATES 8'-O’ CaiTG AIL OTTER CEUTGS TO BE TRUE VAULTED W/ RAFTERS 4\0 jrjr^__ ._____4'-a SJARS DOWN TO r^T. (Pm -j~- — ________y __j L_'I_”_!____i• 1 i tw P05I$r ok;, lum eud: mma tma3000(1; OOC. FI6. w. 4r EBOf m. (s/a T C L |-> ra L _ r I 0?^^ ---------- II II II II i I I I I I I I I I I I III! ii. J _ _ _ _ _ i-,-3 j-j^-_-5'°^T-3-2M TOST ■/: «’^foV)CT 7X6 AT W O.C. l/r A.0. AT 6* a O.C. 6* CQC. am aoQc 4 0GUS5 OF ir core. BLOCK 70 X 8 cere. ftg.Aa BOBBOP roOTteS TO re I vtr. ir Baow m. gua OARA&t ♦* OOC. flOOR 50^ TO n?on I ''7( U^i TUfOSf \-f\z:z:z:z:z::Z ! Z ! Z ! n . „ . _ 7 FIRE SEPARATOR MTNS/8"TYPEX WAl,Lnno' tJTOOT SHEATHING. IP CUH.INO IS I SinTTOR RREWAi.i.TimN .sum;'; nwi' I WALLS MUS T ALSO HE I'l’.t ‘ TP.Cn^ ^oJte JOINTS TAI’EI) - GAUAGl; I- I’RP^ _ _ y||_ _souD_caRE..si:Lpn.i sMcPi • 6X7 OM DCX3P 2-Pl.T (4* KV1 lew tXL IVR.twfWS tp CO irJlT 1 9.03! DTT lAi f —T-(T‘ 'RUiWE «D04 flCO? TO ft OrVAIO) 6* Iff. 6X6 POST 6X4 POST OARAOE i* coc. aoop a at 10 n»7fT 3-7X6 POGl ig-y_____ :p:z:m:*@<:z:z:z: y.*- 36X36X17 COC. FIG. ^7X1 AT 16’ O.C. ' I/r A.0. AT 6*-(7 O.C. , 4* core. OJB aoex I 20 X 8 coc. fie. , 9Y7 oil txxjp «I uvM icw-Str«.7 ovfi. «o roi / JJGT fWJf ^ iS‘-or yr lo-r M’-cr 32- or OOR AKl f 1 ff i wv- .it SI, ojs ■oa majHmm mmi vma miOit . . ..1 W-'Bit OC *v ♦ i Y- .W, REAR ELEVATION 1 M. L FR(?MT ELEVATION |••0 ZXt CSC IX10 BSC Fi V4 R.T a£ FASCU L Sv I iiTfcm II nil ^n>i K To:Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator Stephen Weekman. On-Site Systems Manager Date:February 10, 1993 Subject: #1797 Troy Anderson, 1490 Long Lake Boulevard, Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA, Lakeshore Residential, 2-acrc minimum Pertinent Ordinance: Section 2.3, Subdivision 6 <B) - Side yard setback. Existing = 20.4’ Proposed =s 20.4’ List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Existing Floor Plan Proposed First Floor Plan Proposed Second Floor Plan Proposed Front Elevation Letter from Neighbor Topographic Map Description of Request The applicant requests permission to add a second story to the existing structure within a substandard side yard setback. A partial second story is currently in progress which does meet the required 30’ side yard setback. The applicant requests a variance to add a second story to the remainder of the structure which encroaches 9.6 ’ into the side yard setback. The proposed addition would not result in any changes to the existing hardcover and lot coverage. Hardcover between 75’ and 250’ of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) is approximately 16%, while hardcover between 250’ and 500’ of the OHWL is approximately 13%. Lot coverage is approximately 3%. Soil testing and septic system design have been approved by the City for a 3-bedroom house. The installation of a conforming septic system is required of the existing building permit and suitable area exists for the proposed addition of a third bedroom. 2^ning File #1797 February 10. 1993 Page 2 The neighbor immediately east of the applicant has expressed concern over this addition as the expansion area will overlook his residence. The neighbor has stated that he is pleased that tte applicant intends to renovate the home, however, he requests additional buffer between the homes. The residences are 60’ ap;ui ^ith a privacy fence and a deciduous buffer separating them. The neighbor is asking for a coniferous buffer. Statement of Hardship The applicants hardship is the unusual shape of this property, which limits expansion due to the required lot line setbacks. The location of the existing structure prohibits expansion to the west, south, east and some portions to the north due to setback restrictions. Therefore, the applicant wistes to expand the second story addition currently in progress in order to provide additional space without further encroachment into the required side yard setbacks. .J nm nanrlr f n 0 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIO^ 1 ®.I Initial Application Fee $175.OC ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) CTTV *r V'"*waff rvAMi/rr rtcrrrc 9 w*« t 175. a vv V'V'V A i rev rLrrt- nwii-cwn Ik. ■:,LrrcrzT^-UM^i{M^ww.ai I I I .rtitiA I ww i75. w vv a In V a I a PROPERTY IMFORMATK 01/1 Site Address /490 Ikp. 5lt>rf. (^fOrlA Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) -//J^ >3 3 oc?o.^ Attach legal description to application if not Included on required survey. Date ProEAtty AcMuired _ _ _ _ _(month/year)PT9pex^ I (do|^o not) also own the adjacent parcels of land, nt-^sd^cPresent-^OT^of property: i/' residential Zoning District: other(specify) APPLICANT Phone (home) Name^Troy Q Arvief^n Phone (wor)c) 5^ 3> Address: 14^r> Lyv? L~Kht City:_QjfA)Q^Zip; OWNER (If different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (worJc) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated C'UiStruction Cost $ /S> r\ Describe request in detail; fk (X. (5. Z/34-" 4rf^rV\ en<^t f VARIANCES RBQOIRED Lot Area Lot Width Lot Coverage v/^Setbaclc:Front ^Si _ _ Hardcover _ Side ___ Rear ___ Average La)ceshore Other (specify) HAROSBIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual propert: conditions preve .ing compliance wi^ Zoning Code requirements;A-hiiriu)? 1^ fOrocortlJ^^ • ~ >p.C o ' \-Pr*!hbT>t^ypnn$.ir-n.i j (attach additional sheets if necessarv) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS the following information Must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to b« considered <yplete; 1» \/ Completed Application Form 2. _Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 346-3271). 3. Tlat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. \/ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as rer^.ired (provide one (1) copy 8%"xll" for reproduction). ✓ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes ^in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). 6. V Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8>j"xll"). As an addendum to this application^ please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8,_ _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date ONNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga* tion and verificati/w of this request. Owner's Signature Date /~-(<’7~?3 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review sieetlngs of the Pl‘***nlng Cosnlssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. J.Lrr ir' ^*7 • . t ■n DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04r Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that ycur request for ^ permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. a-A.- •You are notified that: . . 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. ^JKO^- - - First 'Middle Last 1 rhD Address J r'O'TN.O -S T S 1 Citv State Zip Phone «« 4.» j7 i jL J 1490 Long Lake Boulev'ard Orono, Minnesota 55356 January 16, 1992 City of Orono Municipal Offices P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Ito Whom It May Concern, It is our raq'jest tJiat we have our vauriance application reviejjed at the February 16, 1993, Planning Conmission Meeting. We must vacate our rental property by .‘larch 1, 1993, and as we cannot assxme occupancy of the existing structure until the second story addition is completed, we would greatly appreciate your consideration regarding this request. . Hi^k you.i 4Troy and Cathy Anderscxi J lUN UTi oun/n SATCN OM OmEII NAHE TAXPAYEII HAHE/AOM AOM (Men mm TAXPAYER HAIC/AOOR PROP ADOR ONNER MAKE TAXPAYER HAHi/AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR sa E4-iiR-n n ooai014M LONG LAKE RIVO J N GARDNER A A L GARWER ANITA L GARDNER 1AM LONG LAKE DLVO LONG LAKE MN 5SSS4 5D EA-llD-ES SS 0005 tlSEO LONG LAKE DLVD D J SMITH IKS JONDALL D J SMITH A K S JONDALL I5A0 LONG LAKE DLVD LONG LAKE Itl 55S5A sa t4-iia-ES ss ooeo OOaOA DAKOTA AVE J N DEiaaY A K J GASNER JANET N DEfMAY aaa Dakota ave LONG LAKE Itl 5535A sa 2i-iia-2S ss ooEt OlADS SIXTH AVE N NILLIAM R A DARBARA A PEARCE NILLIAH A DARRARA PEARCE PO DON 9300 MPLS Itl bSMO NEmEPlN raUNTY PIRX»ERTY INFOIDUTION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LISTsa IA-lia-23 33 0001 01A90 LONG LAKE DLVO T D ANDERSON A C A ANDERSON TROY A CATHERINE ANDERSON 1490 LONG LAKE DLVO LONG LAKE Itl 553SA sa EA-lia-ES S3 OOOA 0I5S0 LONG LAKE DLVD «ANT 0 EGGENDER6 GRANT D EGGENDER6 1530 LONG LAKE DLVD LONG LAKE MN S53S4 3D E4-11S-I3 33 00?1 ooaaa Dakota ave 0 A C NOOONARO DAVID A CYNTHIA NOCXDIARO DDD DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 35-lia-2S tZ 0001 01405 LONG LAKE DLVO KURTIS A GREENLEY A HIKE KURTIS A GREENLEY 1405 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE MN 55354 REPORT NO. PI43540I PAGE 730 24-110-23 33 000401514 LONG LAKE OLVO CINDY J EREORICKSON CINDY EREDRICKSON C/O STATE DANK Of LONG LAKE DOX 434 LONG LAKE MN 55354 30 24-110-23 33 0014 01535 LONG LAKE OLVO BERNICE 2UMBUSCH BERNICE ZUMOUSCH 1535 LONG LAKE OLVO LONG LAKE NN 55354 30 24-110-23 S3 0027 01410 LONG LAKE OLVO ANITA A KEITH VANDER ORi K R VANDEN BRANDEN 1460 LONG LAKE OLVO LONG LAKE HN 55354 38 35-118-23 22 0002 01525 LONG LAKE OLVO L M CAPRON ETAL H/L EST L N CAPRON 17505 OLD ROCKFORD RO PLYMOUTH MN 55444 ♦ PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR PROP AODR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 30 35-110-23 22 0003 01509 LONG LAKE OLVD JAMES E COPLIN A NIFE JANES E COPLIN 1509 LONG LAKE BLVO LONG LAKE m 55354 30 35-110-23 22 0004 01505 LONG LAKE DLVO JAMES D NEYHE ETAL JAMES 0 HEYHE 1505 LONG LAKE DLVD LONG LAKE Itl 55554 TOTAL DATCH 004 00015 30 35-110-23 22 0005 01445 LONG LAKE BLVO DONALD H LUND ETAL DONALD H LUND 1465 LONG LAKE OLVO lONG LAKE Itl 55554 WH MTi 9i/n/n tATCN UCItCfUi CQiAirY MNVCRTV INPOWUTigH SYSTOI raOKKTY OMCRS LIST RIPORT NO. R1«SS%Q1ti * 4 \ • •' V. »• * V •.:». » » tfA W*jr .. ; t * *? ' >-<«. . • X CfRTirv THAT THI FACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE ^PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEMCPIN COIMTV DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST , i- OF HY KNONLEOGC AND BELIEF OATE^■ta /jj c:. ^ * : X . ♦ ' • V ■ f^•7* » . / ' . • i ■'jk • i B « I t4f179 Cer*-.i t icrite of Survey for Troy Anderson of Lots 3 & 4, A1nee's Long Lake Addition and in Gov't. Lot 1, Section 26-118-23 Hennepin County, Minnesota Stc. 2 g 0/ /j T*t4, M>, 2f/ M83*Al*E SouiVt llHt of Z(o T\\t> KZ”!) Existing Legal Description Lots 3 and 4, Albee's Long Lake Addition, Hennepin County, and That part of Government Lot 1, Section 26, Township HP, Range 23, lying East of a line drawn parallel .to and 67a feet East of, measured at right angles to, the West line of said Section 26 and West of the extension south of the most Westerly line of Lot 1, "Auditor's Subdivision Number 291, Hennepin Conntv, Minnesota." This survey shows the location of an existing house and a driveway serving parcel to the north of the above described property. It does not purport to show any other im provements or encroachments. o I Iron marker Ocarinqs shown are based on an assumed datum. rv«iMy^ ORONO COPY ^ CUV OF ORONO / SITP PIAN__GRADING PLAN i^-SSi'.'i.nnEv.»NS 1 1 CoiiiN & Gkonbfrg, Inc.I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my diioct super vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws ot the Slate of Minnesota. .‘N -i ,. I »A TE I - E» - 3 5» ^CALE l' i 40 Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 lou NO. ^ a. 544 ny - 5“ v v • .S* J? ♦ »•n o HI !i ” I.. P?li K A ii I \ iI m X 0)’ 3 (O T] O O 2 D)3 % > Ii i»r E < 5«• • « . I tfl O) -1 1^* • fi r.. I i : w - !• •: I • ti: I. f*; II. • -I hr .ir I . h;r rr !i, •v. I -I o 3-a 3 c mmm • • C/D O ?3 Q 3 5*r- 8 DOo O- *■18 r 3 OQ Oo 3 >. 8 na cr-2rt V i! • I 1§; : I! :i.. rh\h !!i ui I ! II • « c> \ 1 •1 ---------------\ p4tKi Door To RcfiMin I. !i! p c/3 O 3 D 5^ o \. F if ' ^ 1 ? ! = /L Iftl1>a II Him I III -------------------- ■! It :n o m 0 < 0 SPEED MESSAGE AC- Mt.M D GtlCINAL mu»» • • ?4- ' .w <j » r .Vf « • • \. •r V " •■•^7s‘'^V: . »i"- • V - • •>:v .1 •^1 .• *• • t ••v • -» riSs •'* ’s' % • ' V ‘ •■ •, • tf 'j"’;,:.: ;--a ? ,*1', isfe,;;;-’ - ifi»<#-k ' •1 • • - rw • ** * •• tV-.,-- '. • S '. <•' * I . -V # • ' • • • • '4't v^ -.* ■• f .• * • 52 ■••■V v^ '■ p'- ^ • jjf ^» » V 1 p;-* • I. • •* •p ' ‘ r- .v5*C- • •. • • ' •• • • "^:iV .-•/ r-.'vy. ■ < •fJti’i ; :• •- .#«' ' A * ' ■% . / I P'- •■ I (p / 4/03 ^ TO;Planning Ctxnmission Members Ron Mtx>rse, City AJnumstraior FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building dt Zoning Administrator DATK:February 8. 1993 SIBJKCT: #1799 Albert and Sally Hamer. 1685 Fox Street • Conditional Csc Permit Variance • Public Hearing Pertiueol Ordinance Section 10 03. Suhd. 19. Applicants propose alterations in excess of 100 cubic yards. Alterations will take place within approritnatcly a 8,000 s.f. area of a 22.700 s.f. drainage easement area. At deepest point the pond will be apfroximately 5’3" (existing elevations 933.3. propivsed lowest elevation 928) \ariance Required for l^and MiTutions within Area Protected by llowage and Con»rraiiiio Easemeol As already noted in the earlier review of the 3*lot subdivision, the low wooded area was «>t classified as a designated wetUnd withui the City’s mapping nor is it a DNR pnMected wetland. The area was designated as a drainage easement with the standard flow age and conservation taken ov-cr the area. If applicants propose alteratioas w ithin protected drainage easement areas, the City must approve per the conditions of the Flowage and Conserv'ation Easement. Applicants were required to make certain storm water improvements for the MCWD permit involving 1’ excavations for the purpose of creating a sedimem trap. As applicams’ applicaiit'n involves excavations greater than 1’ a separate conditional use permit has been required. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Nfap C - Property Owners List D - MCWD Report 6/30/92 E - MCWD Permit 11/20/92 F - Gustafson Lencr 2/5/93 G - Flowagc and Conservation Easemcn! - Manser Addition H Existing Topography I - Private Driveway - Cross Profile J - Grading Drainage Plan Zoning Fik* #1799 Fchniar> 8, 1993 Page 2 Ik'scription of Ki-que^ Applicants Iunt filed a conditional use permit to e\ca\ate a pond of approximately a 5* -f depth that will hold standing water rather than periodk runoff created during t^et seasons. As Hansers ’ MCWD permit requires excavation of 1’ for sediment control, land alterations within the drainage easement area are required and have alreads been appnncd by City and MCWD The pond will ix:cupy approximately 8.000 s.f. of the 22.700 s f. drainage easement area Refer to Exhibits H and I The entire low area is at the 933.3' elevation. The adjacent wetland that will interact with the low area is at the 932.3 elevation Ni>te the culvert has been placed at the 935.78 elevation The engineering plans for the private driveway base been approsed by both the MiniKhaha Creek Watershed DisuKt and the City Engineer. Note th.ai Lots 2 and 3 will share a private drive once it leaves Outlet A. Lot 2 is required to grant appropriate easements to L^h 3. The City Engineer ’s .rpon does not review the merits of the applicants ’ plan as proposed. In a recent plume conversation, he confirmed that applicants' proposal is complete and would meet the intent of the MCWD permit. Gustafson recommends an expansion of the application to provide compensatory mitigation to offset filling of designated wetlaiui to the northeast for the City's improvement of Fox Street Members may remember the earlier conditional use permit/variance application of the City of Orono that pn>pi>sed the expansion of the Fox Street roadbed. The City has been working with the DNR to kxrate an appropriate area for compensatory mitigation within the immediate watershed. The City Engineer states that if the existing alteration of the pond is expanded to the 933.3 elevation at a 1' depth approximately 14.000 s.f. in area this will meet 21.000 s.f. area required by the DNR permit of the City. Absent a storm v.ater management plan, the City must obtain the landowners ’ approval to make use of the drainage area. Review the Flow age and Consersatu^n F.asement. the owners arc limited in their use of the drainage casement area and the City’s mam interest is for the unrestricted trespass of water There is nothing in the easement that would allow the area to be altered by the City to solve more comprehensive drainage issues. If the City can work jointly with applicants/owners in meeimg the requirements of the City's permit, this may be the best solution to your meeting. Staff will contact the owners as to what their position would be on this recent request of ilw City to expand their application. They will also hear further from the City Attorney as to the authorities granted the City under current Flowagc and Conservation Easement. Regardless of the magniruJe of the application, the following guidelines have been established by the City Engineer ’s report if excavations arc to be made within the lower area. All dredged materials must be placed at least 75 ’ from the drainage easement and fenced off with silt fence for erosion cimtrol. It has also been suggested that some of the excavated materials 2U>nin2 File #1799 February 8. 1993 Page 3 silt fence for ermion control. It has also been suggested that some of the excavated matenats can be used by the City in constructing the embankments along Fox Street It would be staffs recommendation that an\ organic materials be placed at least 75 ’ from the wetland. The ixiilet area adjacent to culvert should be protected with silt fencing and that entire area be restored to native grasses. Applicants have expresad concern that the current permit will expire on April of 1W3. If the land alteration is expanded to include the City’s needs, the City will be required to present an amended proposal to the DNR and Watershed District under its current part. Issues for Consideration 1. 2. 3. Absent the City’s needs if the original MCTO permit approving the subdivision required land alterations within the low wooded area w(wiid the additional excavations have an impact on your recommendation? Is the application more acceptable if areas disturbed arc rcsiorcci to their former natural state? How do you feel about the pigg>backing of Uie City’s needs upon a private ow *^rs proposed improvement? If the Cit> had a storm water management plan, this type of request from the City Engineer would be common place. Hardship Statement Review Exhibit A. It is the position of the applicant that land alterations have to take place within the lower area to meet the guidelines of the MCWD. The deeper elevations will allow for standing water and als4> function as a sediment trap. Tf ORONO - GiLNLilAL LAMD USB APPLlCATlOIi / /// / rpERTY LOCATION ■j/. ^ ^ .7X ,1 ‘ 'Sit* Address ______rr<^t'r //~ M Ai fc> V «5 'W* Property Identification Nunber (P.l.D.) ^^ -2'^ - yV - ^ Please attach le^al description to application if not included on required survey. / a/4^U^ APPLICANT Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name f f4llt Phone (work) 77/f •scf^ Address //W ^44 City A.ay^:*^A_ _Zip fS'Jf/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name Phone Address City _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zip_ _ _ _ _ Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL OSB PBUUTS - _ _ _ _$ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP applicaf^l^l^ OFFI^ l'J50S)0000$125.00 Residential accessory Use ^ ^,60 C^£CS Ti 2O'Jm0O _ _ _ _\ $175.00 Institutional (church# school# etc.) ‘<^CnPT-THiW( YW _ _ _ _ $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments i2^3i:0 COOl Ml 714:: $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg 01/21/9 $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration X Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain _____ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more _ _ _ Grading# seawall# retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore _____ PRD/PID - se' fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (•♦• consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation ______ $175.00 Easement Vacation _ _ _ _ $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____ $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____ $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District ~ Present Use of Property X esidentiial Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:1' r 4 A’A** A A*t4 's 4 £iU< riA ^4 •^4 -^4^ f ^^fy,/<»'"»v *■ A ^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Coipleted Application Fora. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtai this list fron Hennepin County Departnent of Finance A-b03 Covernraen Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), 5* Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPT (11* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner oust sign this application. Please reaeaber that your application is not complete if the ^cve information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Cl jrlcal Staff:_________________________________Date _________________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or xinusual expenses Incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the'best of his/l)er )cnowledge. Applicant's signature rnermest or nis/bei Data 4-uM- IS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ac)cnowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and veriff^tion. of this .request. Owner's signature (, yj/k.^ //c/c^j \ Date ____ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Comiuission Meeting. Planning Comiaission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please males arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building a Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. in-.33- (iji!) «*• MTi 9i/i9m MrCN mt NCMCPiN couMrr MOPfvrr LNroi>*«iri(!i ststeh nssrciry otcts itsr TAMPAym M tx-117-n <n M10• l«t« tNIMflllC M A nUBtXSON All flAAAlSON AlFAtt A INCAIO i NJLinilSSM lAlA SWiiELlIC M HAVXATA m SSS^l M lo-iir-xs 11 mi OMM AmtM (AlAmCWA SUAO n AZNAAl iUAO N AXMMI IMS rwc ST MAVZATA m SSS«1 38 02-117-23 33 0014 1665 FOX ST KATHLEEN 0 MACKE KATHLEEN 0 MACKE 6432 TIMBER RIDGE EDINA HN ;^:>439 wmr m. AiAisAti AAa iM •T-llT-tS A1 •14M TOM Sr mi MAAfTtflo cngNO mwsiP tORtriClA OMMO P c/| ACKIT J TMiUCI P • tCK noo MPT M •MIS m ssm 10 1A-117-M 11 mso Aomss ona ^ignu MCIIOO CMTY MO AAIl Al^N OAROTA Ull INC ts AOAm ST N MITCNlMSflM IM BISO M AS-117-XS *A flMS rOK ST SUAO M AXMAAl SUM M AOIAAI IMS TOM ST HATZATA m SSSfl totai . SAT CW 38 03-117-23 44 0003 1695 FOX ST RICHARD J A KATHLEEN S CATHCART RIDli\RD A KATHLEEN CATHCART 169;> FOX ST ORONO m 55391 38 03-117-23 44 0004 I A I S HANSER ALBERT A SALLY HANSER 3600 IDS CENTER HPLS MN 55402 O') 0) ?> tH t CIATITT THAT TNI TACTS WPWSCNTft ARf M ACCURATE AW TRUE KPRCSCNTATiaN OP INPOBttTICN AS I? APPEARS THIS OATE ON TM| MCOROS or iNt METMEPIN COUNTY MPAPTNINT OP PROPERTY TAXATION* TO TW iiST OP NY PJONLEDCI Af» BCLIET. DATE iN(H3 ‘to jidili • E 02 ul 91 0$ s:Ta\ €12 4T.1 €002 A-NCH u R JUEMIFI tttiS* MIAlniEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT ^.0. Bd 387, Vftyais, Minmoobi 55391 jBM JPC R. San^ Hi. • Jum E. Twss* TlnntlK Llk^j:^ Utt II.B«mSt8 ^rmit 1685 Fox Street Jcnc 30,1992 Wayzaia.MN 55391 KSS' SSSSSSiSai?i^'5S"4Ma°SS- DdrMr. Raiuerr ' by thsBort of Maaima ;u!d sainn aln-n .Ilnwinr tt. Dtena Mff 10 to» yemr penal oBly liter receipt «d naff of the * ^J!rm inycn clfiradoci and sizaa rffecfnarfft. ai umwcua^Mttd '™*®‘ locajioa, for1: i^i!?^.?^ y or ttfp» Jaiy 13.1993. g teie liea, .« no, y«?ai% conopondeace to IT you have tny qcesuoss sgsrdlag this miner, please coatict me et 473-4224. Siccsrely. JAMES H MONTGOMERY. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC Eagiaexss Cor the District ax Board Sis Ronald S. Quiabeck, P^. 112 01 • 'iT 5o «12 473 «uu V IkMUi MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. loa 297, Waytuto. Minnesota 55391 BMBfi Hiaflt.J—• Jamr. MwtQ llUdBi*C fftottCkUm• C>lnenLindqr• TlnnHUapit.Jc UQ MiajiiiLii&i November 20, 1992 ’ Permii APPUcarion .Vo. 92 -4J- AppOconl:Albert D. Haxiser 16S5 Fox Stra:t Wayzala, MN 55391 Location:City of Orono, Sfc. 3DC, foutli of Fox Street and of Orono Orchard Road IPurpose:Stormwater managaoeot plan for a 3 lot sbigle famflj resi subdivision. ial Dear Mr. Hansen Receipt is acknowledged for the following which you have submitted as pan of the above permit application: 1. Revised meet consmicticn plan c!a«i Octobo" 7, 1992 The above exhibit is in accordance with the action taken by the Board of Managers oo April 16, 1992, in reference to the above pennit. This document is your permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Pennit approval is based upon the following exhibits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 3. 6. 7. Pcrraii Application 92-41 received March 9, 1992. Hydrologic calculations dated March 7, 1992. Letter from DNR dated April 73, 1992. "" Letter from the applicant’s representative to the City of Orono dated March 9. 1992. Revised site plan dated May 21, 1992. Letter foim the applicant’s representative to the District dated July 10, 1992. Revised street construction plan dated October 7, 1992. J 02 ai 9i 0»:21 iTJ iiuu2 >« lLNnFi Pernih AppUcadon No. 92 ’41: r^gc Two November 20, 1992 The pennii Is valid for ooe year. If coiistrucaon is noc oomj^leted bytl^pnl 16.199Sfci extension must be requested. The appliouit is responsible for compuZ^ rules ind for the actions o. your represcnudvcs. contractors and employees. The owner has the responsibility to operate and maintain the approved stormwater raanagemait which were designed in accordance with District Rule B. Hose contact the District at 939- 8320 whai the project is about to c»mmcnc8 so an inspector may view the work In pro^»ress. Sincerely, WENCK ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers for ihs District Mjccael A. Panzer, P.E. f Vice President • - • Dezre of Issue MAP/r^ cc:Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono i^lark Qronberg. Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. BS^ m Bonestroc Rosene Andeflik& Assocfates Engineers A Architects i ebruarv 5. 1993 or- O n JMipr C A'xl^^ ^ ^ ki' ^e f ^ • Cm n f Su^ G ^ •#fh A S^r*cwQ Af Af •• A •t-W *t OM O .mau »f iMA C •u»«% A A A lDu<«Dr Af Hlp« A Af A t c »f I An^ Af Af A A SA^^AT a ^ Pf Vrws M Iaaq a c ^ « ^-e*vr Af C - Af «rs»s f VAmh A Af 0 Af AT^’A#* A ArxV'AO^ Af U at « ff AnA\ M AA«»a a Af C^AT> A Af i tiff Age At Aeirhenw^ Af O Af AA«S i Af . Ais^Orm • Af A^ . Af ? A - AT-'AI Af • >yju Af at ^ f Af kVMAA O Gw«^Aon Af CACAA 0M» Af A f A^pr LAO M ^&rnwmt M^rsjr M OiAPr A f>jpA>jirA Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator Cit> of Orono P.O Box 66 Crystal Bav, MN 55^:3 Re; Albert and Sallv Hanser File No 139-1799 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the site survey for the proposed pond on Lot 2. Block 1. Hanser Addition located south of Fox Street in the Southeast Quarter of Section 3. The pond is pr-»pmed to satisfy the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ITie requirements specifically ask to provide one foot of sediment storage capacitv which will be Mtisfieil The pond is proposed to be constructed in an existing low area surrounded by wtxxls This low area IS not identified as a \v®tland on either the DNP protected Waters and Wetland Map or the National Wetlands inventorv Map The low area is at an elevation ot 933.3 which is 1.0 feet above the OHWT of the adjacent DNR protected Pi owns Bay W etland (27 855W). As this area is not a wetland, it would be an ideal location for the coinpensati^ry mitigation needed to do the City improvements on Fox Street. The mitigation aiea must be 21,000 square feet excavated down to the wetbnd OHW’L of 932.3. The ex’sting 933.3 contour is 22,700 square feet in area, and is several feet inside of the drainage easement on all sides. W^e recommend the proposed pond be approved by the City provided that the plan be modified to provide additional excavation out to the orain.ige easement limits. Tliis additional excavation is fipproximaiely 1.0 feet deep over a 14,(XX) square feet area. The excavated m.itcrials must be placed around the hou.se and fenced off with silt fence for erosion control. If there is excess excavated materials available, the City may want to utilize them to construct the embankments along Fox Street Coordinating the timing and logistics of this exch.mge should be distussed with the property owner. The wetland mitigation area shi'uld be restored by spreading saKaged topsoiForganic materials and seeding with native grasses. Ihe outlet culvert should be protected with silt fencing. Page I. 139A.cor 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-A600 Citv of Orono Cmial Bay. MN 55323 Rc: fik No 139.1799 Februan 5. 1993 We win forward the mitigation proposal to the DNR and Watershed for their review and comment. Please ci>ntact me at this office if you have any questions. Yours verv trul>, m m BONESTROO. ROSTLNE ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. SDG li l39A.cor Page 2. 8/W92; 9/2/92; 10/6/92. IJT '^-9S0765 FLOW AGE AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND WAIVER OF DAMAGES THIS INDENTURE is made and entered into this !^^"day of Octc^jcr, 1992, by and between S. ALBERT D HANSER (also known as Albert D. Hanser) and SALLY DODGE HANSER, husband and wife, and their heirs, devisees, assigns, and successors (hereinafter collectively referred to as the YSrantors") and the CITY OF ORONO, its successors and assigns, a munidpal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (herdnafter referred to as the Grantee.) WITNESSETH, Grantors, for and in consideration the sum of Or.e Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, hereby covenant, grant, gift, qxiit claim and convey to Grantee the right to restrict, and Grantors agree to limit and preclude the use, improvement and development of, under the conditions and covenants herein contain^, the folloning described property in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: All that part of the northwesterly, northerly and southerly parts of Lot 1, all that part of the northerly, northeasterly and southerly parts of Lot 2, and all that part of the northerly, easterly and southwesterly parts of Lot 3, all in Block 1, iT>\NSER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, as specifically shown and labeled as "Drainage Easement" on such recorded plat; (hereinafter referred to as "Land") as follows: 1. Grantors hereby covenant and agree: A. No structures shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, within and above, or within and beneath the Land including without limitation, fences, fireplaces, steps, docks, piers, hardcover or roads of any na^re whatsoever, or any other structure or improvement inconsistent with the natural slate of the Land, save and except, however, for that certain private driveway to be constructed near to and southwesterly of the easterly lines of Lot 2, Block 1, HANSER ADDITION in part over that portion of the "Drainage Easement" connecting the "Drainage Easement" area in Lot 2, Block 1, HANSER ADDmCN, with the "Drainage Easement" area located in the northeasterly part of Lot 3, Block 1, HANSER ADDITION; such private driveway to be constructed in accordance with the terms and provisions of that certain Private Driveway Easement and Road Maintenance Agreement executed by and between the Grantors and the purchaser of Lot 3, Block 1, HANSER ADDITION, and such driveway to be constructed in acccrdance %%nth pnvate driveway and drairiage improvement plans which have beer approved by the Grantee t engineer B. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destro) ed, cut or removed from the Land except as authorized by written consent of Grantee, and except as authorized in connection %vith the private driveway construction provided for in paragraph l.A. above. C. No earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Land and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of tlv; topography of the Land Hitlwut the written consent of Grantee, ai.d except as authorized in connection v.*ith the private driveway construction provided for in paragraph l.A. above. D. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land except as authorized in coimection with the private driveway construction provided for in paragraph LA. above, and no w-aste, trash or garbage shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land. E. No use shall be made of the Land except uses, if any, which will not change or alter the natural condition of the Land, and no use which would tend to change the drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, fish and %vildlife habitat characteristics shall be made of the Land or the water situated thereon, except for the private driveway construction and use which is provided for in paragraph 1 A. above. F. Grantee may enter upon the Land for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Land without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconiistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Land, except for the private driveway and any replacements and/or reconstructions thereof provided for in paragraph l.A. above. 2. Grantors hereby grant, gift, quit claim and convx y to Grantee, a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Land. 3. Grantors herein do hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, forever, the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from •2- any and all claims, demand or caus^ of action of any kind or nature whatsoever whidt may arise or accrue by virtue of any Howage or trespa » with water within terms of these agreements In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants Aid restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantors do not intend that the public should have any interest in the tbove land by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except as hereinabove set forth. The Grantors herein certify that the Land herein described is free and ciear of all encumbrances except: With respect to all of Lot 1, and all those parts of Lots 2 and 3, al in Block 1, HANSER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat ther«sof, lying westerly of the east ILne of the Southeast Quarter of the Sertheast Quarter (SE 1 /4 of SE 1/4) of Section 3, Township 117, Range 23c i) that certain Mortgage dated February 24,1977, filed Mar..« 3, 1977, in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County , Minnesota as Document No. 4269300 in favor of The Farmers and Mechanics Savings Bank of Minneapolis in the original principal amount of $160,000.00, the mortgagee's interest in which mortgage is now held by ’’MARQUETTE BANK MINNEAPOLIS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION", a United States corporation; and ii) that certain easement granted to the Metropolitan V«'aste Control Commission dated May 15,1975, filed May 23,1975, in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County , Minnesota as Document No 4142369. With respect to all those parts of Lots 2 and 3, all in Block 1, HANSER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying wit'iir Section 2, Township 117, Range 23, that certain easement granted to he Mebxjpolitan Waste Control Commission dated May 15,1975, riled May 23, 1975, in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County , Minnesota as Document No. 4142373. -3- All pix>visions hereof shAlI run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, fe^esentahves, grantees or assigns of the res|»cti\'e parties hereto. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) )55. ) n'Th The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ^ day of October, 1992, by S. ALBERT D HANSER (also known as Albert D Hanser) and SALLY DODGE HANSER, husband a'.d wife. NOTARY PUBUC This Ixistrument was drafted by: Dorsey k. Whimey (JJT) 2200 First bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 :RRI OLSON fiOTwrrweuc m#incsotx HENNEPtN COUNTY ji^s <«i mm .<y •4 FOX STREET Dot# Scolf * T >z 0)m 3D CO CDo oz REVISIONS DAT!1 nr DCSI6NC0 (ion. «ftc cot>cn, or '«>o#i *0% piCpO'td bf *w or unOt* <W| ()•*«(* %vip«« «>^iOr« or«d *No’ gir r <1 •, W«o««»«Td 1 wT«0«r tO« lovt ^ 1^ .A 1 r LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: Lot 2. Block 1. MANSER ADDITION, This survey intends to show the bound aries of the above described prop erty, and the proposed locetlon of a proposed house. It does not purport to show any other inprovements or encroachments. 0 Iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. • f¥T.0 9j • f09. 0 s fJS,0 j 00**1 r0 9€ 9^00^'^ 90000*0 /00m/4 < 0000C00 i0*r 090 0000^000 r00.>*rW0C. TO: '7 Planning CiHnmUskw Members Ri>n Mix>rse. Citv Administrator FROM: DATE: Jeanne A Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator February 9. 1993 SUBJECT: #1801 Kirk Sherman. 2505 Old Beach Road - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10 02. Subd 13 Building Height. "The venical distance between the highest adjoining gnxitxl level at the building or 10’ above the lowest ground te\*el. whichever is lower and the lop of the cornice of a flat roof, or the deck line of a mansard roof or the uppermost poiiM on a round or other arch type roof, or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Topographic changes which elevate the adjoining ground level above the existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building teighi. Adopted; 2/24/92. With the adoption of this amendmenl, building height, no longer was to be determined at final grade but from existing contours." Applicant seeks height variance; ■Allowed » 30’ Proposed « 34’10" Variance ■ 4 ’10* or 14% Section 10.03. Subd. 14(c) Lot Coverage. IxA coverage sundards do not iRily as property exceeds 1.99 acres. Section 10 22, Subd. 2 Hardcover. 250-500’ setback - 137.650 s.f. Proposed » 12.510 s.f. or 9% (allowed ■ 30%) List of Exhibits A - Application B - 1-3 Hardship Suiemenc C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Plat of Marsh of l^fayenc F - Lot 5 Site Plan G - Lot 4 Site Plan 11 - Lot 6 Site Plan I - Topographic Map J - Hardcover Facts K - 1 Drainage Grading and Utility Plan for the Marsh >f Ufayette K 2 Site Section Zoning File #1801 February 9, 1993 Pace 2 I, Map of Treed Areas M • Building Section N • Denxmstration Building Heighi Secik>n O • Elevations P • Letters of Support - Affected Property' Owners Q - Survey/Topographic Information R Map of Soil Borings S - 1-og of Borings/Lol 5 IK-iicriptloa of Request Applicant seeks a height variance to the newly amended section of the code dealing with controls on building height. Height is to he governed by existing elevations and not final propo«i elevations. In this case, review Exhibit Q. the vertical distance was determmed from the highest adjoining ground level <939.1 ) as it proved to be lower than the lowest ground level plus 10’. Proposed home is designed with a mansard roof based on the code section the measurement is taken to the deck line of the mansard roof, refer to Exhibit M Applicant notes that if strucnire was designed with a gable roof there would be no heighi problem, refer to Exhibit N. The applicant advises that based on the new interpreution of allowed heighi that 2 1/2 story colomal homes with mansard nx>fs and full basements would technically not be allowed in the City. The impact is intensified for this property with the full basement as the smicmrc must be raised to meet required 1 ’ separation from adjacem flood plain or OHW of wetlands at 932 elevation In this application, the first floor elevauon is 3’ aK»vc grade Please review Exhibit B 1-3. the very complete hardship statement prepared by Shawn T. O’l-aughlin. KcTiew of Hardships 1. 2. 3. Review Exhibits K 1-2. proposed house on Lot 5 is setback approximatclv 267* from Old Beach Road. The total height of the proposed structure would he perceived as lower than the existing adjacent structures. The locations of all the structures were established by recorded soil borings determined to be the most suitable for building. If there is to be a basement, baseme.Tt levels w«Hild be abcive finished grade based on the flood plain of the area Structures on Lots 4 and 6 based on sloping grades w ith walkout and the design of the roof arc allowed a total building height of 42’. Zoning File #1801 Fcbniao 9. 1993 Page 3 4. Toul builUtng height of Lot 3 is 34’10* as measured from the highest existing elevation 939.1* grade. This height is consistent annind all elevations of the proposed building. Whe«eas house on Lot 6 measures 30* from the street side atKl 39* to the rear. House on 1^ 4 measures 30* from the street yard and 41 ’ from rear yard. 5. Applicant notes house on Lot 5 will actually be 6* lower than the adjacent residences. 6. A classic 2 1/2 story colonial with mansard roof and as further described in hardship #4 could not be built based on the limitations of the building height section and could only be installed with a walkout design which applicant claims is not really suited for the traditional colonial sty le. Please note all properties within the City ire subject to the height regulations - not just lakeshore. Ivsucs fur ConsidcTatiofl 1. What hardships arc valkl in the variance request? What findings are valid in the vanaiKe request? 3. 4 What was the intent of the building height code amendment? What is your response when applicant*s consultant claims this specific design of home cannot be built in the City because of the approval method of determining allowed height of structure. Wliat will be the real impact of this structure on the immediate neighborhood? Docs the area of the lot. proposed setbacks, the unique physical feature or adjacent land uses have any bearing in your determination? -^/SC! /- CITY OP OROHO - VARIANCE APPLICATION \ \ ' / / iInitial Application Fee $175.00 g ^ ($50.00 per each additional variancfffTr* Pencval Variance Fee $100.00 • (no change froai original application) Variance for non conforming u*e $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION sit. Addr... l-oT 5 . Slocfi. i .Ihi c:u if cr<se r.M)d OFrid Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) » II7* »-<a Attach legal description to application if not vI included on required purva'i^ c-rTpr_>ua^»v Date Property Acquiredi I (do)f?b also ovm th^e 'Wjacent Present use of orooertv: residential ____other (specify ) coci mi to^ V A/ Zoning District; APPLICANT Phone (home)-Wfei— N.m. M/e K/fK Phone (work) Address Citv:Zip: ^54ol. OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (hoB»)N/A H.«. e.w uTC PKon. («ork)/Mi:2i(2_ _ Address: Nifi City:Zip: ©S44sL DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST EsUmat^JTon struct ion C i.-07 Co^i : Describe request in de^ll; ^ is# . til TNT" "r ^ 7 "ATTn< Zi l^QgQL-gfl Ja/ta/\Cf or la‘t* - - - - - - - VARIANCES Lot Area Setback: Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore ^ i| ^^^Other (specifV) ^ f Qi HARDSHIP/DBSCRIPTIOH OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property (attach additional sheets if necessary) UQUIRED S0BM1TTAL£ All of the following information aust be submitted by the application (deadline data in order for your application to ba considered ccmpletei 1. ^X Coaipletad Application Fons 2. WCertified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center y 348-3271). 3.2^yPlat Map (obtained with property o%mers list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*i'*xll” for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy •>i*xll”). Sketches or plans of floor t elevation views (provide I copy 8>i”xll"). As an addendusi to this applic.^^tion. please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. i.\ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remeober that your variance) application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APFLICAMT'S SIGMATUM The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information reruired or requested by the Zoning Administrator* agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application* and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to^he beat of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature correct to^tne oea Date OmiERS SKmATORB The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff* consultants* agents* Coamission members* and Council members for purposes of .investiga tion and verification of^his request. 0%mer*s Signature ^I Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning CcaMissioo and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting* please make arrangeme.Tts to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Bui ..ding t Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. .f ^4 ^ J 'ft »• STATEMENTS OF PROPOSED HARDSHIPS The Runyan/Vogcl Group, Inc. Architects Sherman Residence - Lot #5. Marsh at Lafayette Hardship iii ”Mansa/tl* roof versus a "Gabtod’ roof: The definition of building height. Section 10.02 Ittm #13 o4 the adopted City budding ordinance docs not ckarty define the term ‘mansard*. • The total building height of a ’gabled* roof building is defined b>; mcasunng 30'-O* from the lowest grade elevatioii to the midpoint or the average mean point of the roof, see plate 95. • The total building bdght of a "mansard* roof building is defined by meisuruig 30'-0* from the towea grade elevation to the deck of the root, see plate #4. Hardship: The definmon of building height becomes a non-issue when the proposed building is setback 267' from Old Beach Road, see site section plate #2. The driving for« behind Ua of this setback IS to locete the proposed building where the best known soils exist » support a built improvement, see plate #1. The total height of the proposed d«ign would be perceived as lower than any otlar existing adjacent strucrures. Please note, the building pads located on plate #1 are city approved and are recorded on the plat documents. The building pads and finish floor elevatioQS were established by recorded soil TOnngs which determined the most suitable, buildable soils above the floodplain cles'atioo for each lot. All basement floor elevations arc to be a minimum of 2'-0* above the established floodplam elevatioo of 931.5. For this reason, the first floor elevation of the proposed building on Ia 4 #5 is 3'-0* above ^ade and the residence is therefore "lifted" out of the ground. Sec dimensions on plate 92. Hardships January 15. 1993 Page Two Hardship n building height of <*?'. which if the roofs were gabled, the measurement is taken to the av^ge mean ptnnt of the roof. UM #6 (cinniuv ««te coosoucoon) i« sBbick JflUC f™n «d Boch R.^ lor hra cue mis. TTie tool IsuUdin* hnfht « JO -O" u imasuiwl from the front y«rd esiiut* (tide, •ltd is 39'-<r as mosured from the back yard existing grade. Lot #5 niie Proposed Subject Rt^oce) is sctbock from ^ ^ case soils. The total buiWing height is .%4'-10* as measured from the lowest grade; this height is coosisleni around all elevatwos cf the proposed building. Lot #4 (completed Parade of Homes *9: model) is setback 3^ best case soils. The totai building height is 30'-0* as measured from the front yard cxisung grade, and is 4r>0* as meauircd from the back yard earning grade. The proposed building on Lot #5 will actually be p'-^_ The proposed residence is not relatable. in terms ol ^ysical ttrinmire or improvemen:. see plate #1 and #2. Hardship #3 The Marsh at Lafayette is a total seven lot platted development. Lot #5, the subject property requesting variance, is the only on-grade site of the development is nKtrict^ by city finance to a total building height of 30 -0" and not subject to a 12 “ ouUincd in Section 10.75 subdivision 3 of the aty ordinance. Hypothrt^ly. the improvement «i Lot #5 should be the shortest building of the development, regardless of its setback, grade elevations, and ctesign. HARDSHIP #4 Adopted City Ordinances of die City of Orooo are not conducive to building a ^ition^ Colonial residence cxempiary of the true style; two and a half story building, high floor to floor ceilings, raised front portico entry, shed roof design with attic/sto^c clerestory basement windows. A walkout lot is the only site sccnano on which a coloni^ $ y home might be able to exist in the City of Orono, although a walk out lot is not suited for the traditional colonial style. January 15, 1993 Pate Three Hardship #5 The »nt«rnt of the adopted buikiinf ordinance Section 10.24 »ibd. 5A. creato a •blanket • residence because the ordiiance does not ever consider or rocak to ^inc or unique «ic that exist on the proposed Lot #5, as well as any or the soisiuve deugn mues thal have been resolved undetectable within the building design. See and review all plates: • Platted building pads • Existing trees • Site section • ftnlding devatioos • Knlding section • Neighbor testimonials Lot #2 Lot #4 Lolf6 Plate No. 1 Plate No. 3 Plate No. 2 Plate No. 6 Plate No. 4 and 7 Plate No. 8 Plate No. 9 Plate No. 10 iUN lOATCMTtM Wf •nr inriMiftnN STsrfw •TT cmis ilST if w. M%umlimmommn Hmm it SMT^rnsMMTct roitMTicii IttSIMATIft IgUNDAflQM f^S CO •• • mvZAIt »04 MS^l M rt-ll7-fS 11 wit MOlt AMtfSS UMiSSKricMMTti rcurmrioN faiSMMITtt roUNMMGN m CO n 4MfZATi »•« tt1«l 10 ti-iir-n ncm i swcncm A MCN»%• Oii KACO n MV/4TA HN Witl Aon TAKOJKTCl / SO n-iif-fi fr •COM Oii HACi n N M • A A IMAMS IflCHACl II A UTM Ai WOAMS COM OiO MACN m HATZATA m »sn so n-ii?-cs fi •CAM OiO OCACO m miMSCO coHPOiATim miMSCO CQMMAT1€» •Iff CiffvMOQO io COCN iOAlill m SSS44 so tl-llf*M Cf 0017 OCASS Oii KAM n lA c ifCIOffM COMANf IMC 0 C AlClOMO COMOlir iMi 1S7O0 iftMi iO io MOil oMvi loi isuf omn NAM tAXiAYli Mm/AOM so n-117-fl ff MIO •CfOt Oii OCACN 00 c m oiAicii CO in pncNi I M OiAMCN CO its iTIMi SSM M OOTi ST m ssASi SO ti-iiT-n ft iolf OffIS OiO iCACil i0> i C ilCIOMO CO IMC i c ilcioMo CO Iff: isror iciHii oo no m SS1I1 ftfM. eiTOi 002 MOW I cnrirr toat tm tacts iCPifUMTio am ah acciouti a » touo MiOCSCNTATiaN OT IHTOMATION AS IT AOOCAiS INIS OAfC ON TM ifCOMS M TM MifALTlH COAITT KiAiTMMF OT iOQPCiTY TAXATION, TO TM OiST OT NT TNljMiliOC ANO OCllfT OAfl IW* ». • .> • K' G>; w,. . I / •.c. TmT^rrrvi torsumiTtcKAmmm^E wf.nc.$ %m &kIM. Np> t# fciii — . V 5j \ %rfi« \ ji, ttr.j—» ti. OflBBVs - #«g ^I iili - ~ 940.0 f- - Tit Ii list Jit 111,,, nmr 7 4-* •.m Lmmwm atiMr m « rr A_ •PNI _ L J 'V\: BL.\NCH CO. Mmnstof M431 • n»%ow #12 ^#3# 33 10RcinSUrdflCB SstViCBS iaMji*62it4aw February 4, 1993 FEB 5 1593 Ks. Jean A. Mabuath City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Orono. MN 55323-0066 Dear Jean: r.. W. Blanch Co. ownt all of the lota that comprise The Marsh at Lafayette, except, of course, for lot sales to Richwood Homes for The Parade model home on Lot #4 and the Codute residence under construction on Lot #6. I understand a meeting is scheduled for February 16 to consider a variance application for building height on the proposed Sherman residence on Lot #5. We have reviewed the building Ians for the Sherman residence and believe that a beautiful ome would be constructed that would only enhance the surrounding area. E. W. Blanch Co. is in favor of approving the variance for building height. I have asked Shaun O'Laughlin of the Runyan/Vogel group to represent E. W. Blanch Co. as its agent at the February i.6 meeting. Shaun understands our desires to see the Sherman residence constructed as proposeu and will represent us accordingly. I Tom Nelson Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer gb exec2040 cc: Shaun O'Laughxin — f January 21, 1993 Jean A. Mabusth City of Orooo P.O. Box 66 Orono, Mini^sota 55323^0066 Dear Jean: My wife and I are currently building a home at Lot #6. the Marsh at Lalayctte. Shaun O’Laughiin. our architect, has infonncd us that he is submitting a variance request for the building height for our proposed neighbor’s residence on Lot f5. We have reviewed the buildii^ plans and a location pLa<i of this proposed residence. We are strongly in favor of its design and arc not concerned with the building ’s height. This home will be almost 275' away from ours, and if you could just walk the land, you would agree the house on Lot #5 will not impose on anyone. We are probably the only lot owners that might have a concern. We are in favor of the variance request. Sincerely, Tom and Alecia Codute Lot #6 - The Marsh at Lafayette cc: Shaun O’Laughlip PLATE #10 tf I • I i P * ’ 4 •» * RICHW'OOD HOMES <_ * T to, I9fi Ciijr OF Or—q 1US 9rpm M. ^.0. Pot 66 Crystal B«jr. M Altai Jeao P* RalHistli Otar J«4a. K irk Jj \ .I otII know I m lare tiie *arl for I at. I $ Tlw Marsfc at L«fayvit« •l 1 >ttil Wf I 4a«'t think thnrt 1$ my Issnr hrre niRUitr the rarfaiKe stmid te franied. I think Uw hultiHng yreposal is a sensattve deslpn that still idil««r*i the orUiUDces Intent tn Unit tnlldinf (wight. The residence nil 1 he less of an tnpKt on tl» nlstlng nclipAaiiooi] thei any foe %trvcijrB vltliiii the am. Dirrently I om Uw adiai»t Lot #4 resiamce which nas In Tho Paritfc of Hoaes. I haee had r^»it cfiftversatloiis with two ms onctive buyers for this tsae althowgh each has axiwessod an inUrest to roM — ontlngent Nijwrs uatll they better know that for swre the erofiuMM residonce for lot ib Is qrMted city aiwro«*l. 1 therefore look to the city for sepyert and hope that the necessary fovemingi bodies can ronolve this issoe. SIncoroly, Rfcfwrd t. Kalow President/ CFO 13780 hnkrw Drive, w^«e S Maple Cfove. mn M3i8 (•12) 42^3357 n C AGteKnd Contpwy. 0*4 T n T Cl A . A I PLATC #9 xo80 Shaun O'Lauqhlln Runymn/Voq«l Crcvp 1309 codvard St. SUito c>2oo Hpls, KM 5S413 JtM, It, Dtar Shaun, Va ara aarloualy consldarina purch'«inq lot $7 and buildiiif__ __ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _.no . hOM or. Old Eaach Lana in lUnnatonka laach, JIM. W ur.doretand thara la oorcarn ovar tha baiqnt of tha propoaad hoa# to bo tullt on lot #s. »*a would llfca to aaa tna hoaa built as currantly propoa»»d. Oa would tharaCora auo{jort tha qrintinq ol a varlanca to allow tha hMo to ba built aa planned. Slncaraly, David and Cind^^TTrudell Itl Kaadow Lana Lonq Lalia, i*H 55356 / • * I PLATE #8 KL^>^S UX UvA « I TTttLg^*' rUii.♦ ill 1 c 1 1n % ON ^BH00^ #4* !«•• « vaa r*»«»B4v I^AA* Mk«4 «• 4ta» .«M •ifcf •#»#• i» «#«< •j=i^rs t j^_r•—- ^* -* X • >«M •••^ • I »■» ..i«» A *-•*••>-•• ------- — •1------ixm. a^ fct O' wM Muft -ruipStcP p*9 c^ir f«OiNK»4c6 Mi^ "Tvie»s-*pe^ SNOL»JO. ^ ♦-liSHgjL TVI^^h] *-S am «^'— » ••t7rT4 *• ♦ ••• .#» mm -mm m • •*■•«••»•'«• *-m •m • m . •».•* •■• •• «••«»%• *•• • • •-• « •»• etcTicPU a It: “f C.*!)o 1 ^ I ti WttF Jto^ T'fda^U -C5 g) -■‘tiff % j:iV^ ^iiAm 3 • f^OfejfeC? g)J|LCPlN(i> feaC-Tl£?|S • oM f>€«JWW4 VTCll cjt\r•*• •( tvm • •» • •• V •> >^ • .•«• «k• *>•*»-« * •*•“• •• •• t'M*. • j__ - •_•>___ jk^ ^ I* M ^ •% Ci-5ror § %u» I 4 /n LOT 5, EXISTING TREES •MitH/yocSL •HI-. •A ___ ___ u. - n mtmvt *1 iwMirH m ri4N » r 1 g 01 U4 ^ \T> n 1 ^ ^ 0 ^ P t ^^ J e, fu * 5 tvj' fco. 6re»d^ 'sf# ' ■' r;/^ i ^IT£ e>ECTld?K ■ r* DRAINAGE. GRADING . 8 UTILITY PLAN ORONO/MINNETONKA BEACH. MINNESOTA PLATI #1 i • i •• / SETaACK (CltCl-£ 0*it) EXISTIHC HAftPCQVt^tW " '*y_f -». Hmisi - t.r X X X X X WIDTH ^\o ,. G««. e. Boivnut —* 1 ^__X I \C. fc.r. • • i.f. s<f* s.f* 11 - i.r. ^7wO i.f. g.f. • B,. SioewALK - m Bi ✓ »• r f _ s.P. y^ ,- . S p.___ ^ • r • E. Patio / ' Dicx % m b^fe^s.p.o ■ ■? 1 • . • mt ___iif* g.Landscape _ AACAS umocnlaih __ X — IF i.p. BY ' ^ flastic SHEET1H9 m S.P. f ig-" _ X --------- ¥ m . S.P. i i • l.X. '4i:a. Otmeb —-—■ “ . • Total Hardcoveh in Zone «*l.F. Total Phohmtt A aca in Zohc Q 12 .gio ,.t |TU^^L^ »^__________% L-CTT^e suiii . I Pf^OfC7£?£^ '’L^i£/r?NOcr. THE MARSH AT LAFAYETTE ORONO/MINNETONKA BEACH. MINNESOTA f 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 « i LOG OF BORING '5 PHOJECT; BABX-92-133 CEOTECILMCAL EVaLI ATION Tht Manli at Lafa^tte Lots 1 ThroiiCli 7. Block 1 Oroao/Mtka. Beach. >rmn«sota 9377 935 9327 930.2 927,2 T18.7 BORING ST-5 LOCATION; Lat S. ttucti 1. DATE: 3/24/92 SCALE r - 4 £!cv. OcpBi 939.2 00 UJ ASTM Symbol Dcscnptioa of Maieruis (ASTM D:48S)BPF Tests or No«i CLAY, with Fibers, brown, wet. (Topaoil) 4 0 \0 I rLAY wtih » trace of Fibers and tewet of POORLY GRADED SAND, brown, wet. medium. (Alluvium > SILT, frayish-brown. wet. loom (Alluvium) i M.C - 23« a 10 .y SANDY LEAN CLAY, wiih a trace of fine Gravel. ; ^ frayiah-brown with iroo suininf, wet. toff. (Glacial Till) 'SIL'TYS*A*ND.’finc i meium-fralned. with a aace of fine Gravel and Icnaes of POvRLY GRADED SAND, brown, moist » wet. medium dense. (Glacial Till) •.2 0 ■SANbV*LKA>r(!LAy.*»^tn *a trace of mie lo coarse Gravel, frayish-brown. wet. rather stiff to very stiff. (Glacial TUI) CL *fc W ,- /< . y END OF BORING. Water not observed with 10 ’ of hollow-stem auftr in the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 17* immediately after withdrawal of auger. Water down 4* ; day after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. babx-9:;33 Briun Intenec M.C. w MB LL - 4* P.I. • IS ST 5 p*te I of I TfK Froni Dale; Orono Plamiiif Coojnisstoa Members Ron Moorse. City Administntor A. Mabusth, Buikiinf St, Zoma$ A«iintnt\trator Fcbfuarv 12. 19Q3 Subject:#1802 Orono School DisOict #2^8. 770 OM CrytUl Bay Road Conditioful Use Permit • Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB Required area « 2 acres Existing ■ 195.000 i.f. or 4.42 acres Pertinent OrdinaiKes 1. Section 10 28. .Subd 3 (A) - Conditional use permit required fiw a 36’ x 50 ’ adduion to existing structure currently approved for day care.church use. The addition shall allow for expanded day care use and extra curricular student uses (review Exhibit B). 2. Section 10.09. Subd. 3 • Conditional us»/site plan review. List of Exhibits A Application B-Applicant’s ^idenditm C*Property Owners List D-Plat Map E -Survev F -Proposed/ExUtii^ Site Plat O -Floor Plan H -Elevations. Sign I -Specs for Outdoor Lighting J -Gustafson Report 2/4 93 K-Bike Trail Sketch L -Gilding Onkial’s Preliminary Plan Review liivtory of Pruperty and Current L'se In 1982 a conditional use permit was approved for the Orom> Community Church. The existing church housed all church use up to abixit 1987 when Busy Beaver Day Care applied for a conditional use permit to allow a day care Day care use was limited to a maximum 29 student/teachcr ratio as building was not sprinkled In if.e summer of 1991. a sprinkler svstem was installed in the building The day care now operated by the Orono School Distnci was allowed to expand beyond the 29 use level. The property was purchased by the Orono School District sometime in 1992 The church with a limited congregation continues to lease the struemre for church uses on Wednesday and Sunday. The pastor of the church ctir.iinucs to use one 01 the t ffices throughout the week /xma^ Fik #1S0: Febnur> 12. 1993 Pife2 PropuM'd L'ttf The Orooo School Dtstnct has applied for a conditNHial use permit to alhm the coQstniction of a 36' x 50* addition to allow an expanskm in the day care use m>w providinf day care for pre-school afc children predomhantly in morning classes The Schix-! District adsiscs that the huildif^ may contain the fi>lkmrinf uses at various times of the day (review I \hibit By. 1. Middle school student drop-in center • students from 5th through 8th grades during the hours of 2 45 p.m. • 5:30 p.m. 2 High school student drop-in center - use center for high school students I - 3 per week from 7 00 p m. - 10:00 p.a. and sveekends from 7:00 p m - 11:30 p.m. 3. Evening adult education classes - Schoi>l District meetings. 4. Facility renul similar k> the types of users that currently rent the school facilitks on the west side of Old Crystal Bay Road. Site Pino Review tSection 10.09, Sohd. 3) LOCATION The 36’ X 50’ addition will meet the required 50’ setback from all lot lines. Review E.\hibit H. The exterior of the structure will he completed of the same materials as the existmg structure, redwood siding with stucco finish. All other outdoor recreational unprovenwnts ate to be located behind the 50’ setback. The day care use would be limited to 51 students baaed on the 2.560 s.f. fenced play area (50 s.f. per snideni). PAVING IMPROVFMENTS PARKING SPACES The building proposed with multi uses will not all function operate at the same time. *n preliminary discussion.s with applicant, it was decided that the use with the most restrictive parking needs would establish the namber of parking stalls needed for the upgr^. The area oi the church sanctuary is shown at 1.103 s f by architect and 3.207 s.f. in Building Official s plan review We should ask for dartficatton as Building Official has included area beyond folding wall to the south of the defined sanctuary. The following parking sulls will be required based on the two area estimates 1.109 s.f. ■ 159 occupants; I for 4 • 40 r.aces 3.207 s.f. ■ 450 occupants; 1 for 4 ■ 112 spaces Proposed ■ 40 spaces 2^onif^ File #1802 February 12. 1993 Page 3 The tollowinf are parking requirements for ocher uses to be conducted within structure: Day nursery ■ 4 I for each 500 s.f. in excess of 1.000 s.f. 4.625 - 1.000 - 3.625 s.f./500 - 7 Total spaces * 11 Office Use • I for each 200 s.f. of floor area 4.625 s f7200 ■ 23 spaces Coenmunity Center • 10 4- 1 for each 300 s.f. in excess of 2.000 s.f. 4.625 - 2.000 - 2.625 s.f./300 - 8.73 Total spaces ■ 19 The application has been reviewed by the Police Chief and he advised that the parking should be increased as the area is used for overflow parking for school activities. He also asks that curved median areas in parking lot be physically defined by curbing rather than just striping He asks that basketball court area be relocated out of dnving lane Please review Exhibit J Gusufson t»tes 'the sidewalk aloi^ the building is proposed to be a raised concrete surface that will provide a curb for the parking lot in those areas*. Fi>r the portion of the north end of the parking lot that is not adjacent to the sidewalk, he recommends curbing be installed. He notes that there are other alternatives if concrete curb cannot be insulled. Prior to the parking lot being repaved and striped, applicant shall provide a final grading plan showing grades and typical sections for both parking lot and drainage swales if they are to be installed. Review Exhibit K. Ihe property is located within the areas of the City’s comprchcmivc bike trail plan on Old Crystal Bay Road. The City will ask for easements to install bike trail at an approximate 8’ width locat^ 21’ in from street lot line The approximate wklih of the easement would be 10’. The C*ty will require temporary commiction easements. Gusufson advises that one small pine tree will be removed and transplanted within the immediate area. The specific location of the trail setback has been approved because there is an opening in the trees along the north lot line. The City will ask the school to grant the 10’ casement and necessary temporary construction casements for the bike trail. Per Section 10.61. Subd. 5 (A), setbacks for parking fronUstrect setback Required * 50’ Proposed ■ 40’ A single parking sull livated within front street yard setback area must be relocated. The loading area defined on site plan as trash and recycling area to the cast side of strucrure is shown at 12’ x 20’ and should oc enlarged to 12’ x 25’. 7xmki$ hile f 1802 lebnian 12. 1993 Page 4 DRAINAGE The applicant (woposes no changes from the existing drainage pattern that has always flowed to the south to the City ’s property where a drainageway takes drainage to the center of the section draining eventually under Highway 12 to the railroad track, and evennully to Long l.ake Although City- Engineer’s report notes that drainage swales would he intulled. it is my understanding that there will be no change in the current elevatk>ns Drauiage will apparently sheet fk*w out over the parking lot to the southern lot line. Review of Floor Ft in Building EIrsatidO ’The addition will be approxunaiely 12 ’ in height, easily meeting the 30’ height limitatk^i. The proposed additioc consists of expanded classroom area with bathrooms, coat rooms, kitchen and an additional activ.ty area. The addition will be spriokted. An appn>ved fire alarm system shall be tied into tlx sprinkler syfiem. Sewer/AVatcr The property is served by both icwer and water. The Building Official advises from his preliminary calculations that one additional SAC would he required. The City will also advise of any additional sewer assessments or water assessment to be charged against the property for the new expanded use. Lighting/Signage The site plan shi>ws two 30’ poles with lights that arc shielded downward, refer to Exhil>its F and I. Refer to Exhibit H. signage is proposed at approximately 19 s.f. The CixJc limits signage for all conditional uses within residential zoiks to 12 s.f. The City must appnwc a signage area variance of 7 s.f. Landscaping Much of Ihe landscaping rcquifcd by the church has already been planted and were required along the fxirth and wcst/strcct lot line Refer to E.xhibit G Applicaiu has provided a planting .^.'hedule w ith more formal plantings adjacent to strucnire amsisiing of Thornless Hawthorns. Sea Grct n Jumpers and Evonymus. The southern and casiem jxmii>as of property arc bordered with mature trees. Should addiuonal landscaping he prt>vided.» Kccommcndatton Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall provide an executed Developer's Agreement and appropriate security to ensure the following improvements: /ooiof File#1802 February 12, 1993 Page 5 B Pav«| ruprovements lo be ip|»’oved baseiJ on final grading and dratnage plan. &ich plan lo show grades and typical sectmo. Stntnng of all designated puriing stalls. Landscaping per plan Bibmitted by EOS Architcvmrc for Oiono .Student Center. Sh .1 #P-2. 2. All traffic flow, stop and fire lane signage locatioas will he desennined by the Orono staff. 3. Sign at appn>xunaiely 19 s.f. shall be insulled per plans by EOS Archittcture for the Orooo Student Center. Sheet fP-3, to be insulled at a maximuin height of 4* 2’. 4. The new »ldit»a shall be insulled with an apprv^ved sprinkler \>Mem and a fire alarm system that should be tied to the sprinkler system. 5. Upon application for building permit, the applicant«ill be responsible for making necessary SAC payment and for any additional sewer or water charges for the intensification of use. 6 What is your reccxnmendation for final number of parking lUlK * A. 40 as prop''«d by applicant. B. 57 approved in 1982 for full church use. C. Other The School District shall be asked for a permanent 10’ casemeni to allow the insullation of an 8’ w ide hike trail to be installed within the street yard. The City shall make ail necessary landscaping replacement. 0/ OROIIO - LAiy^UbK APFLK^'^IUN PFOPBRTT tOCATIOH v ! Sit* Address 770 Old Crfsfal Ba» Roed ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 281187343000^ Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. __ __ __ __ __ __ mg. Mm qm * APPLICAMT Phone (hoBWi?______________________ NeBe Orono Ind»p€nd«nt School District »2 78 Phone (work) 473-7313________ Address 685 Old Crystal Eav Rd N__________ City Long L<k«_____ Zip 55356 UWNBS (if different than applicant) Phone (home)______________________ Name __________ Address City ______________ Zip D^rq_Property Acquired October 30. 1992 ___ (nonth/year) I l^oy (do not) also own the adjacent parcel* of land. pgiefi - OOHDITKmAL OSB PERMITS - CITY OF DT^CHQ_ _ _ _ $ 50.00 Por each variance request with CUP applicat^^A^r q ^t£^ ijsoci'ocoo _______ $125.00 Residential accessory Use ^ . cii£C^ TL 37! t%yr $175.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) — — liECEiFT- rnm you $150.00 Guest Rouse/Cuest Apartments HO aIHO CCOl ROI Tli - - - - 01/o: _ _ _ _ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ________ $250.00 CosBBerclal/Industrial Use _____ $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore _ _ _ _ PRD/PID - see fee schedule Renewal Fee - $100.00 (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIC3NS $200.00 Coaonerclal Sit* Plan Review (t consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD « refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule L Pkhi^i^T USE OF FKOFEJITY Pr«s«nt Zoning District RR-IB Present Use of Prorertv Church/Day Car* Residentisl Otl^r (sp«cify) DESailPTlOf) OP RBQOPST Describe request in detaili attachad REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Coaipleted Application Fonr. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you can obtai this list froa Hennepin County Department of Finance A-403 Covernmer: Center 34S-3271). 3. Plat Map. 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor'. 5. Topographic survey 'existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 6. Construction plan, if applicable (see staff fcr requlrecents). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you w.sh notified of this application. TOO ARE REQUIRED TO SOPPLT 30 COPIR8 OP LARGE DOCUMEHT8 OR A MORKTIiG COPT (11* R 1/* OR SMALLrai) POR ALL OOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. reaieaUt>er that your application is not coag>lete if the above Inforaatiori has not been included. ME MR MR MR ME ME • • Ml MR MR ME MR ME 4M Ml €M Ml Ml MR MR ME MR MR 4M MR ME ME ME ME ME ^E ME ^E ^E ^E ^E ^E ^E ^E ^E ^E ME ^E ^E ^E ^E ME ME ^E ^E ^E Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICAHT*S 8IGHATORB The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OflHERS SIGHATURB The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, comnission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Coirjnisslon Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccanmission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building 4 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST 1i -V w Orono Independent School District no. 27t ie reque:>tina 3 conditional use perait for our building locet*»d at 770 Old Crystal Bay Road. The conditional use permit should be for school use with all associated prograee a:id activities Including pre school child care and continuing the present uses. The present use of the building is for "Orono Rare For Kids School Age Child Care Prograe" and "Orono Coaaunity Church." The child care program serves children kindergarten through Sth grade before and after school, on release days, and during the summer. The Orono ComsMinity Church rents the pastors office full time and uses the rest of facility on Wednesday evenings and Sundays. This facility is an extension of th«* District's campus operations. The potential use of the facility could be as varied as our present buildings. Any of our existing programs may be housed at that location in the future. Some of the potential uses of the building in the immediate future may be: Preschool Classes: providing enrichment etc. for preschool age children, classes morning hours. in music, art, would be held during the Middle school Student Droo-In Center: providing after school enrichment and recreational programming for students grades 5th through 8th, hours would be 2:45 pa to 5:00 or 5:30 pm. High School Student Droo-Tn Center: a youth center offering a variety of enrichment and recreational programs such as: tournaments (ping-pong, volleyball, etc.) big screen TV, music - coffeehouse, youth issue foxnims, youth service projects, support groups, study nights, cnaperoned trips, theme nights, classes, etc., houra would be 1-3 nights per week, possible 7-l0 pa and weekends 7-11:30 pa. Evening Adult Education Site: various adult education classes may be held at this site such as: CED, family literacy, enrichment, etc. District Meetings or Staff Development Activities: Daytime or evening meetings for staff. facility Rental: this site may be rented for activities such as meetings, birthday parties, scouts, government groups, etc. as with all our existing facilities. ft V mm mu ti/ivn fWy flTT IHrOgHAYICH smut tTf oMin listBATCH mm If lamni mtm, mm/Mom fS-lll-n M BMlOiB CHYSTAi MT I •1ST m im CM ATtr MD tm MS OiB ClYSTAi BAY H A) iUNT) lAUf m SSSS4 M tB-IIB-n %I BBOi mff9 OiB cBTstAi itr to m IM SCMOOi BIST %zm lOMMOl iTTH 9Utf»tlfTfNDf««C IMB SCMOOi BlSf %ZT% lOMOMOl MS Oil CBYSTAi IMT MB M iONSt iiAl fii SUM IB IB-llB-n B1 BBtSB ftOOflCSS UNBSSIOMJ BiBtM r IMICS tf Ai AiBIM r TMIfS IMf MOMSttAB ft ICM? iAM M SSYSA mp TA)9AVTB SB rO-llB-fS A1 BBtr BOBIB ABBKSS UNASStCNiB INO SCMOOi BIST MO tf% im SCMOOi BIST NO if% ABHIM or net- SUtftlMTtMDCfff BBS OiB CAtITAi BAY iO M iONB iMl m SSSSB 11 BBtlSB SS-ltB-rS BBBIB AdOii! OtCNO PiATA BitiBSBQBB iAM riBN BSBs MiirAt AVI s san IDINA »BI SB is-119<n It BOB? BirtB AtiiCY isiBr MBA CITY or OtOND MBA CITY or OMOMO ISSS BB99I to S MAVCAtA m iSStl P9QP ACOi TAXPAYIB 1/ SB SS-llB-n n BBBl BBTBS OiB CtYSTAi BAT SCMOOi BIST NO 11 mOBA-MIlMPIli I S B NO 11 HIM MAMSON BiM M M COON lAPIK Ifi S5ASS ■B m TOTAL BATtM 'oX V.0 .V’ Oon 1 CiMTirv TMAT TMf r«CTS WfMfSfNTtO AM AN ACCVMATI AM THU! MPMSCNTATICM OT INrOMIATiaN AS IT AMtm THIS UTt ON TTS MCOPPS pr TNt MM«MN CtIUNTV MAA«TT«HT OT MOMATT TAXATICM. TO TNI MST 1 or m ANDMUBcr a» BCiicr BA t #11 vy PROPOSED LOT DIYISI Ofl/COMO I HAT I OH Of LOTS 1 and 2, BLOCK I, Crystal Crest Hennepin County, Minnesota for OROHO C0fV4jHlTY CHURCH Tins njs iiEsS raRSFilJIB Date : 7-1-67 Scale: r - 200 Exlstiop Legal Descriptions. Lots t and 2, Block 1, Crystal Crest. Proposed Le^al Descriptions. A. TIm West 642.00 feet of Lot 2, Block I, Crystal Crest. B. Thit part of Lot 2 lying East of the West 642.00 feet thereof, and Lot I. Block I, Crystal Crest. I hereby certify that this survey was _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _________ prepared by ne or under «y direct super vision and that 1 aai a duly Registered Civ.I Engineer and Land Surveyor under ——' ■ - . . .. ■ — the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mayor' CTerF •berg Engineers, Land Su'-vcyors Long Lake, Minnesota Planners ^0 *«tw>«A4.0J» 90m 0000 P5SS gx«x.^ osmsR eas¥^V k < OKrr.<!y oCTOMe • 5 ^ 8 |S|i ! t 1 ! 1!^i “0 1 9 § \ 3 \ s iji:iiN• ‘ilt =1! #Cy OS I= 5dain i i‘r ZC q ho 5^ rn m ^ 3)2!^ H •• ! *• ..............* . . “D ro \ • • • ^# 1302 ■ \s^ m * ^ t F i ill!J illi|I «? jj5l! I^S !|! I'siI owornHjj HO2mm^ H Arm-Mounled Large Area Cutoti ® Wet Location Uw tor l^hino stujmm o» s^r>;p»«g certff parw»?ig )rn OKCtRUiGSIQUCMCI ___________________________________________________________^ [ umHUiitiin WOUAa ] [ mCT m wm ■m m ^1% mi m ISS1 %f%m m lUB m Twvswnmtm ST> *m HU mm m SL m HH m 1M it liM il TfH <A Mil •ZT» m m ^ M Ml m mi M mi line M ncM M ’• fSf »AH H , m aeu nM « * HI im HM « •tm lUU 1HM M ii 1'71 mi in* H iM mi nta « es gni MHi M 1WI avSl ti£C9 At Pofmt>ty KV ouwocm VM I MIMM •* iM Tfi w__U^|< * i« t'W ^ ^ tvi M .'«• ' l/r rule* *•• !««*♦» •• mt m Mi % J9 SM A) <A3 iTid •pM ^ ; I ijC ri H# Vi eUM W.eon <».hi K»»t “itte a Uniew ^’aiW_____ »«>»> r—r *< tfnvt_______ 4-<re («V*-•*»! ______ ACClSSORtCS OWiiniKSii* (■V««r •'« 4f IM f « %• •» NOrri; - • 77^ « « SSi. HiUURU mt«^nno»«i»aw «S nr«lf*SMMMn»a>iM«i t^ mWM>wrl- l|peW(Aw* maMfcJ T|*«nr(»«ni»««l*'»»»t !■•« aC/A t)U UUMfAK1VC* l^’**** - ■n M ■ I Boncstfoo Rosene ^ndcr1ik&Associates» 6 Arcfwt«cts FebriMfy 4. Wl Ms* Jesmme A \Ub«sili r^ml^ t Mdef ) jHjin iiCC psaii ntimfT) sir too •IS tM U’i* iiW } I n.ovO ^ctDi w4i -JUfMi* 4^fd ±M .ITT nrr • • ir ggnnc Uicfof \!€0*JCd I'lb \ Vt'H rrSTIM jns lie jrv iwy 4'»<4 luilisf »il^riteO .•.■ill TTr«ir bLiiilC HI j «Kr. ■ >. f?W J4^ .' •] lUVi] ♦I V \ \ C r) ^ C is%*‘t:ex let i">'- •S%"{^%4 S •• • •• • • • • •l/n 1-^ « 1 1 i 1 «> 1/ 1 . 1 1 1 <*' # ’T •1 ! '' ' 1 1 : ♦ i 1 1♦ 1 ► \ t% ^ ^ ?' t ' i‘ » ' 1 1 \ 1 I •1 i,#r JM(T I'D %• t^AU KA|tfC|sl^I • FIJ^N Ri;\ I»;\% NOTTS L- C^umtkfHs9 Carr A 2 1 Occupancy • SaacPmy . 3.207 i f. ± -2 • 9* of erit vidft required Oivided 9)r 7 • 45t • 4 oraDOMd okay IS* pfopoeed dS4 1 divided by 20 • 34 I eiM reqoffod • 3 proposed 3* ex< vidih reqeired • 9* propored B>2 Occupancy * Offk» . 734 $ f ± divided by I • eiifi - 7 Type of Commtcbom Type V • oar bew requord Type proposed - not ibo«a Locatkn oo Property 2 bow wills required hsai than 10' 1 bour wills required less thsii 40' Survey shows 4S' <f » property Uaee Allowable Floor Am 10.500 liknred • 6.146 ± propoecd Si**i Required ouinber of i iier closett > livitorks duy 1 water fouotiio required All eqwpmem muat be huidicip accessible •.IfMf too . Sprinkler system ■usi be extended throughout new additioa - Ac spproved fm. lUnn system tied ifllo the sprinkler system must be provided . E\ia from activiir/sanctuary must be provided w ith panic hardware - Exit corridors from activity/sanciuary must be of 1 hour coostnictioa, doors must have 20 mia. rating SAC was 1 2 SAC m NOMX for SAC ny rv NOTE; di ■V 1^0 4-4-90 APO00 7UtMimt00 7-4-»f90 6*6 0 z Saa K Ula 1 u K Z ►-< CO #■