Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-21-1994 Planning Packetr 11 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETLNG MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21. 1994, 7:00 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - J Diann Goenen ATTEND.ANCE action mMS ^ applicalion before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 1.j?1975 Larr>- Anhalt. 2190 Wayzaia Blvd. - Appeals - Continuation of Public Hearing 2.#1979 Richard Little. 1890 Shadywood Road - Variances - Ihiblic Hearing. 3.r 1980 A & T Development, 460 Park Avenue Variances - Public Hearing. 4.Mn 1981 Todd R. Courneya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane -Variances - Public Hearing. 1982 Daniel S. Perkins. 55 Landmark Drive - VarianceConditional Use Permit - Public Hearing. a;r 6.u 1983 Tom and Maureen Palm. 1685 Concordia Siieei - Variances - Public Hearing. 7.#1984 Steven M. Englund. 3855 Cherry Avenue - Renewal Variance - Public Hearing. 8.#1985 Bruce Bren Homes. 1000 Co.x Farm Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing. Planning Commission Comments 9.Report by Planning Commission Representative attending Council Meeting of November 14, 1994 (.Sandra Smith). 10.1995 Calendar - Schedule of Meetings - Discussion 11.Other issues for discussion. .Additional Items 12.Planning Commission approval of minutes of the October 17, 1994 meeting. 13.Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the December 12. 1994 meetmg of the Council. Adjournment lufliBil .a. ?! C/’ m /j£ i ii u liivTT'r I, © : -—-' ^ Uv \ •tasfeS^, l . .V'-IA ■ "■>,s/ *r^ilj 3 ^ _-n "i\.• *t*« » V- >’■ / ___t «.•• • 4»*»* '.( ___fw / / v 7 >. nzi / / /,\ •• ««4 «»• to" mwJr T ■ 1 Wiin*. ' ,¥~±;U K C X S-C; i i ® I ">l/i X. V CJ iiilliliiiSiiiiiiliiniillliiils IIP!! iilf pi i iiPS PlPiil! PP I * i i yrA Ui\ UHUm I? ! iiti ii‘li !it llUtl '-t\\lt !i2Si22iU«ll3 fi ^ i’((l iillifii'i H”jnj|lll|(!l j !!‘. ji'sHt!. f! ‘iff >'•••'! $iiiiini>u!hi iit jniJ ff(firn Ml j}?ij «<.«> o nno-n_ -in'»n*-*r**>'',''f'POrr'^^^FFVr------1»^P* * '•Sf»rV»''^^0 = *;*5ZI i-Mn |jS|!lll!!llnii;iii!ii:Pnffili!'lWinl ’i':lsliiia^^ !jij!ljj»ljiijli jjjiji!fiiifiifljil[j!iji;jjliiii}if[iiii!i’ii‘»‘» !'' r ; ( To:Chair Schroeder and Orono Plannlni;: Commission Members From:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building Zoning Administrator Date:November 10. 1994 Subject: #1975 Larr>- Anhalt. 2190 Wayzata Boulevard -Appeals - Continuation of Ihiblic Hearine D - E - F - G - List of Exhibits Submitted in Current Information Staff memo of October 13. 1994 A * Application B - Applicant's Addendum C - Fiat Map Property Owners’ List Sunev Gustafson Letter of October 7, 1994 Engineer’s Sketch-Possible Easi/West Alignment for Access Road H - Staff Sketch-Possible Shared .Access I - Pace 4 of Resolution No. 2653 Granting Approval of Preliminary Plat of Sugar ^’oods J - Supplement to Subdivider's .Agreement (Sugar Woods) K - Pace 1 of First Amendment to Declaration ot Covenants L - Sections of Comp Plan Amendment Dealing with Approved Plans for Future Development of Property M - Comp Plan Amendment No. 2-Transportation Policy Site Plan Site Data Facts Existing Zoning Boundaries . _ Zoning Map Q - Ordinance No. 64. Second Series. Rezoning of Former RR-B Property to R-1A R - Sewer and Water As-Builts S - Gustafson Report of October 21, 1994 N O P-1 P-2 Status of Application The application was tabled at applicant’s request at your October 17th meeting. Since staff’s preparation of the original packet for your O:iober meeting, the City Engineer has submitted an update report, refer to E.xhibit S. Gustafson advises that Mn/DOT will allow a curb cut to the property as part of the Highway 12 safety improvement project scheduled for 1995. It would appear that there may be a need to acquire additional right-of-way from the owner to complete the improvements. For more information on the issue of access to the property, members should refer to .sections of Comp Plan Amendment No. 2 (Exhibits L and M) and in the many Sugar Woods plat documents (E.xhibits I, J and K). The packet for the October 17th meeting has been recopied for Planning Commission members’ convenience. Isv n- To:Orono Planning Commission Members Niavor Callahan and Orono Counciimcmbcrs Ron Moorse. City AJministraior From: Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building Zoning Administrator Date:October 13. 19^ Subject: J?1975 Larry Anhalt. 2190 Wayzata Boulevard - Appeals - Public Hearing Zoning District: B-l/RR-lB Application: Applicant has been brought in on an appeals application to confirm that proposed use would conform to permitted use within the B-l zone ("garages') and to also review required planning issues agreed to bv both City and awner of the property at the time of the Sugar Woods subdivision. There are several land use natters that must be resolved before a commercial use can be installed on this property. Applicant s business. Pro Tire and Exhaust, is located in the Lone Lake Industrial Park at 571 Tamarack Avenue. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review’: 1.Section 10.06. Subdivision 3. 3 (B) • Appeal. Directives of Comp Plan and existing zoning boundaries would not allow City to issue applicant conditional use permit for proposed use until specific land use matters are resolsed. Section 10.40. Subdivision 4 (A) - Garage. .Applicant would apply under this section for a conditional use permit to allow the proposed use. The Planning Commission is asked to review the proposed use to confinn conformance with the ordinance. Review Section 10.40, Subdivision 1 - Purpose/Intent ot Zoning District. 4.Section 10.40. Subdivision 6 - B-l Standards .A. Required lot area = 20.000 s.t. Existing = 46.206 s.f. +. B.Required lot width = 100’ E.xitine = 148’ C.Front vard = 20’m Proposed = 40’ D.Rear yard = 30’ Proposed = 30’ r $F i' Zoning File #1975 October 13, 1994 Page 2 n.Required structure setbacks. Front and rear Required = 35* Proposed front = 114’ Proposed rear = 60’ Side Required = West side = East side = 15’ 15' 72’ F.Height limitation = VA stories or 30’. Applicant has not provided elevations of structure at this point in the review. List of Exhibits A B C D - E F G H I J K L M N O P-l P-2 Q R - Application Addendum Plat Map Property Owners’ List Survey of Outlot E Gustafson Report Engineer ’s Concepnial Transportation Plan ^aTd^f r" ^53;‘Cva. of Sugar Woods P.at-References to Outlots E. E and F Supplement to Subdivider ’s Agreement for Sugar Woods First \mendment to Declaration of Covenants for Sugar f plges'TjTcontp Plan Amendment No. Alternatives tor Development ot Property and Surrounding Area „ #;i s, a? Transportation Plan-Comp Plan Amendment No. 2, age Commercial Site Plan Site Data Official Zoning Map Ordto^n^N^Zoning Boundar>- Change as a Result of Sugar Woods Plat. Rezoning to R-IA Sewer and Water As-Built.s r Zoning File .5^1973 October 13. 1994 Page 3 (Review of Application The current owner of the propert> is offering Outlot E for sale for commercial use. The majorirv of this propertv except for the north 55’ is zoned B-1, Retail Sales Business District. The proposed use would involve the selling of tires, exhaust systems, alignments, shocks, struts, trailer hitches, oil changes and brake serv ice. The proposed use includes not just retail sales of the various items but also of the servicing and installation. There is little diiection in your code. There is no definition for a earaee. The zoning code conditional use section merely states that earaces for the servicing and repair of automobiles are allowed provided repair functions are mtallv enclosed in a budding. Review the purpose or intent of the code. Subdivision 1. \ou may wish to visit the facility within the Long Lake Industrial Park on the south side ot Highway 12.* Outlot E was created with the platting of the Sugar Woods subdivision. The properly was originally connected to Rebers’ commercial propeny to the east w ith the creation of Outlot D. an outlot platted to ensure future connection to a frontage road platted in the Otten property, review Exhibit D. subdivision will be required to reclcssif the parcel as a huildable lot. A buiidine permit can not be issued dtitil this is completed. Outlots within the Sugar Woods subdivision, located within Rebers commercial ci^mdor. were set aside tor future consideration but with specific planning goals. (Review E.xhibits I. J and K) Review Exhibits P-l and P-2, the directives of Comp Plan Amendment No. 2. The northern boundarv of the B-1 zoning district must be extended 55' to the nonh. The 50 corridor zoned RR-IB is a remainder from the original Sugar Woods' rezoning that rezoned the upper portions to the R-IA zone. Outlot E was not designated as a buildable lot but based on the factual findings noted above, the outlot would meet the standards required tor the creation of a lot within the B-1 zoning district. Review Exhibits 1. J. K. L. .M and N. all documentation created for the Sugar Woods plat advised the subdivider and current owner that when the commercial propenies were to be developed that frontage road would have to be designated. With the redefining of uuol to a buildable lot. the Ci'ty will expect at a minimum that the easL^vest road be defined within that plat. .Access to this site is very difficult to resolve at this writing because we have yet to hear from MnyDOT. The upcoming safety improvements in 1995 may prohibit creation o a ni.w curb cut. Anv access approveiJ at Highway 12 would be iemporar>- as it is the goal ot Comp Plan Amendment No. 2 to have all conmicrcial uses served by the future frontage rou . Gustafson in his report (Exhibit F) notes that applicant should provide information on the site plan as to how future access to the frontage road to the north would be provided. Engineer h s recommended that a temporarv' solution for the property might be creation of a shared access with the Wear property lo the immediate east. Review- Exhibits F'. G and H. Gustafson s rep sketches of a potential frontage road location .md sighting ot the temporary ’ share access. Zoning File 41975 October 13. 1994 Page 4 Review Exhibit R. sewer and water are immediately available to this propern ’ at Highway P The owner has been assessed 44 seuer and water units. The payments currently assessed against this propem- involve the 1989 Highway 12 trunk sewer and water improvements. There ar^c additional improvements proposed next year within this sewer and water district. Once the number of units have been determined to meet the need? of the proposed use on Outlot E. the owner should advise how many units he wishes to assign to applicant’s property as part of sale agreement. Applicant may wish to keep all 44 units for Outlot F. In this case, the City’ will directly charge the future ow'ner sewer and water units. General Comments on Proposed Site Plan It would appear that all required setbacks for proposed improvements have been met. It is difficult to comment on the traffic design and flow on site as we are not certain as to where access will be coming from. We must question the car wash. Is it the intention of the applicant to have a car w ash for the general public use or is this just for the clients of the facility'? Car washers are usually assessed several sewer and water units. The location of the car wash may be an issue later in the more formal review. Issues for Resolve 1. Is the use pennitted based on the purpose/intent of the B-1 Retail Sales Business District and per the recommendation set forth in Comp Plan Amendment No. 2 for this area (Property No. 4. Exhibit U? 2. If the use is found compatible with the B-1 zoning district, the follow ing matters must be resolved by current owner of property before a formal conditional use permit application can be accepted by the City'; a. Subdivision of property’ redesignating outlot to a lot and defining of a fumre cast/west road. b. Rezoning of 55 ’ RR-IB parcel to B-1. 3. c.Resolve of temporary access to this property' it the frontage road is not installed to north at this time. d. Impact of 1995 safety improvements on Outlets E and F .... need for additional dedication of road right-of-way or drainageway/retention area. Upon filing of a conditional use permit with the City, applicant shall provide the following: Zoning File #1975 October 13. 1994 Pace 5 a.Site plan/surv’cy locating all impro'ements. Detailed grading and drainage plan c. d. Landscaping plan plus planting schedule. Elevations and floor plan of proposed stroclure subject to special building design and construction standards of the B-1 ccgle for all exterior tv^all finisdies. Applicant ts again advised of the need to not exceed a eO heicht. Preparation for a permit application with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to review all grading and drainage plans. Planning Conunission Action The onlv action of the Planning Commission is to confirm for applicant that use is either STifttrTspe^taedtatp^ 1st U redesignated as a butidable tot, the northern 55- of the pareel must be rezoned ro B-1 and temporary access to site must be resolved. I I'l m- •It I j CITY OF ORONO - GENER.\L LAND USE APIMJCATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^ <C ^ O Vi3 Type of Application to be Filed IA /' .^5 ..VPPLIC.XNT - ■ " PK^nePLIC.ANT , A ) \ _ %^nTTig 1^<^WV7 Address S * ' ^ Phone (work) W13 -H ^ / 0\V?sER (^differem than applicant) Name S.Cl LC«JD:E=V'-- Address -^S ;3 S~ Phone Chome) _______ Phone (v> ork) ^ - (c N yz>\^_____Zip fUT Date Property Acquired_______________^— ----------------------- I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FFES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.(X) For each variance request with CUP application 5125.00 Residential Accesson- Use ^ 5200.00 Institutional <church, school, etc.) 5175.00 Guest House. Guest .Apartments 5150.00 Duplex Credit Bldg ‘ ’ S250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use “ S200.00 Land Alteration --------- Grading and fillmg - designated wetland or Hoodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule ,• • v ” SIOO.OO Renewal Fee (no change from originaUpplication) .After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current .Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS 5200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant few*) 5250.00 Vacation ~ S175.00 Easement Vacation S 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision 5300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) 5300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 5100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District______kN I Present Use of Propertv-Residential Other (specify). (monthyear) HTt w • . I** “ ^ w - . - : • ..A . ^ J-.v A. .'VVVV *4 '***• VA -*VV Ti :c. i-vvA »^v/A 0^ y. •; requmd submittals 1, v//Completed Application Form. 2 \/ Describe request in detail. Certified Propern- Owners List of owners within 350’ (> ou can obtain this list from Hennepin Couna Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 34S-3271). \f . Plat Map. Cenificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach leeal description to application if not included on required survey. Toposraphic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve \ changes in elevation (grades). x/ List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the propeny. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see stall for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any otf.er persons vou wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COP\ FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Cenification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:__________________________Date_-------------------------------— 3. 4. 3. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE , u w ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zonmg Administrator, agrees to pay additional tees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information .supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature ^ — Date^^_^^^------- OWTVER’S SIGNATUTIE ^ hi The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasona e entry onto the property by clty staff.'consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s _____________Date . Applicant must have all submiftairmto ihe City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, Commission Meetings are held on the third .Monday of each month. Applicants must be .„jrrina review meetings of the Planning Commission and CouncU. If an applicant is unable to attend a sch^^ed mt^^ please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Bu g tun of this change prior to the meeting. I - t t September 19^*^ PRO TIRE i exhaust 571 TAMARACK AVE LONG LAKE. MN. 55356^ (612) 473-4261 tJL I To Whom It May Concern I w 1-aWina the time to consider our request. ProThank YOU for taking date and for this rea- Tire a Exhaust has ^h'”%posed biulding site is bet- BlirSea^fcS^ono Self Serve) and Cliff Ottens (ottens Bros Nursery). itr J?:f?i=%?;::^rnS ^^p:riati:^"bace^“%e!:g ^n^htShS^vl^^udild 9i^; u^thi visibility needed to serve this areas needs and also to double our business in 1-2 years. our business includes selling Tires Exhau^ 's^^'T^a^nerf^cuitfue^-utd add-Brakes - not perform engine or transmission 3 ' repairs, greasy, junk accumulating mess assoclated^ith arrivin^so we :-id-n^?"hLr:eh!:!‘r:^o^:d - e^?:fo- rro = ;n;% r fne rhe‘£ui!di:g'Jtrr^:!!r“rcitu!erri:tbrbi^rso,nse^ ^aulers^ oU and ?aferi would be stored properly above ground and disposed of by liscensed haulers. Currently our business hours are Monday thru ‘ ® 1?? *'w- ’ 6:00 P.M. and Saturday B:00 a.m.- 1:00 P..s.. ! |-oi p would extend our hours to Monday thru Friday S-OO a.m. 9-0 P. and Saturday 8:00 am. - 2:00 p.m.. Because the nature of our business is such that we do not typ­ ically see our customers 1-2 times a year we need the h.gh lity of the highway and ifs traffic count in ^ ^3*. ^ ness to thrive. We believe that the proposed location would double our business within 1-2 years and hopefully t^iP ' thereby generating substantial revenues both for our busine - the cities. We welcome any questions or concerns that you may have while deciding on our request. Once again. Thank You for your time and consideration given to this proposal 1 i ! Sincerely , .jrence W>-« dJ-JU- Lawrence Owner nhal t >i-........... 'h\ 311 (3) 13*714 __K «*38 0rc |5 Tkiitm r •* V »1 pJ 5 t <<cy/z (44) E uni or [suGApjifoon 3 r* (t7) : OWU9T f i (^5) ^1 ’ (24) W.M W.T5 DOC »« NJBfir 331«? yy7*<l’t 81. ?> •Ot.Ot gi/Tic? r n) a (24) E ,• « r a ) i (25) * ^26) g (2 TOR- T a (26) r.oimoi t (58) 771.7« WAYZATA BLVO W J - mm, 242* ,IP R/W jB n» » "ill TTToT KE~ I. eOWElReiAL 220.28 (25) 2 5 2 iT”'* F " (26) (40) “ (2^)8! 221.82 P (»)-“ : (35) 5;: 1 *)! (to) (36) 'J,., (t1) ...*••sot R l>t 16 ir:tr f ,0feMO (45) y (44) , 203 - (46) »3 6 z = (47)ir W|_M.9 fon » ten y (52). I toil (43) i 1 - IMSTRIAL fm\! n 53 ?IT. II TSVn * T !*A.9 R \ * A>*: ■TTJI S(I3) ^ 2 . *(I4) * ((i8)4_* y tPcSui ^ El (24). riiT 9 lot 3 (55) SIM «<e*32 ‘<yt (50) i iq^ I M 230TV) « (51) "35Tl)r -eUW:^N&T0^f -NORTtCRff ^^R- ; t .4 (9) - iu5!J2LikLv—-—— -iA' ' 44 IS (46) ___________ 312.14 ___I •.. IttW I >M.ii y iS.?9 J (6) r M/zimMTCN OQS•vf;> ■■'ffo^, um ofCR mm ’Awmil • • . NAHC/AOm ♦HtmEPIN COUrm PROPERTY lNf0«MATI0r4 STSTtM PROPERTY (WiERS 11:^1.38 ,34-118-23 21 0802 ,02140 MAY2ATA 81V0 H HIlLIAn H NEAR t HIFE NXUXAH N HEAR f 2140 NAYZATA BLVO 8304LONG LAKE S55S4\\V„»<: i • .• •. •y:t ^ ,fflOP'AOOR » t,:pMCII NAHE ;JM9AYER. ,NMC/AOORW-;ri,.4r»u»fi:jPfM '* I ’*it S4-118-23 21 0025 0210* SUGARHOOO DR REeERS COriSTRUCTION CO REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO S52S NEBSTER AVE 55*1*i T.r . . VfROP AOOR IM|ER NAHE .TAXPAYER IHE/ADOR-4 A. ••••. • «tf 38 54-116-23 22 0017:.02251 PIt« RIDGE LA C A t OTTENI CLIfFORO I LOUISE OTTEII ;1 P O BOX 24Y ^ LONG LAKE MN 553S4I i .. '•? . . -S-' •- •i'•,A0BR -^JOWER ’ NAME 'K'-'TAXFAYER? ■ ^•^•MAIK/AOOR .4 1 > t >. T * ■> i' • 72:; SA-118-25 25 0007 ; 00520 BRIMHALL AVE: EARL H DAY A SONS INC ' J.8 N PROPERTIES INC • 2B15 HCKENZIE PT RO HAYZATA MN 55391 'i ,_ _ _ 118-23 2* 0002 fM)B-A00R 02075 \ NAYZATA BLVO N ?»tKR name GREGORY M SHAUGHNESSY LONG LAKE FORD TrACTOR INC 2075 H HAYZATA BLVO 0 ;^Io Sg ®Sk E^ JBfg TAXPAYER . in LI ^fWNAm'/AODR; :*';2I 55354 i f-'r; vlf • • * ^ * lm<\ 38 34-118-23 21 002102102 SUCARMOCO DR PEBERS COtlSTRUCTim CO RE8CRS COr^STRUCTION CO 3525 >€BSTER AVE MPLS MN 5S41438 54-118-25 21 003200036 ADDRESS UTUSSIG^iEO SI0T€Y 8 4 BARBARA REBERS SIDNEY 8 i BARBARA REBERS 3525 l«BSTER AVI ST LOUIS PARK MT4 S541638 54-118-25 24 COOl02120 HAYZATA BLVO « HILLIAH HEAR ETALWilliam h hear34 HACKBLRRY HILL LONG LAKE MN 5535472 34-118-23 23 002302225 HAYZATA BLVO H PERRY’S VEfmJRES INC PERRY’S VENTURES irK: 2205 H HAYZATA BIVO LONG LAKE MN 55354 72^ 34-118-23 24 0040 02073 HAYZATA BLVO M GREGORY M SHAUGHNESSY LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR 2073 H HAYZATA BLVO P 0 BCX 497 LOT4G LAKE m 5535b ifK: REPORT HD. PI43S401 PAGE 838 34-118-23 21 00220210^ SIK^ARUOOO OR REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO REBERS COrJSTRUCTIOBl CO 5525 MEBSTER A'/E MPLS H4 5541b38 34-118-23 22 OOlSC0038 ADDRESS pumm C I L OTUMCLIFFORD t LOUISE OTTIN BOX 249LOr4G LAKE MN 5535438 34-110-23 24 005800038 ADDRESS UlUSSIGTflEO SIDNEY 8 A BARLARA REBERS SIDTiEY B A BARBARA REBERS 3525 WEBSTER kvE ST LOUIS PARK MN 5541472 34-110-23 23 005302205 HAYZATA BLVO HPERRY’S VENTURES VKPERRY’S VENPURES INC 2205 HAYZATA BLVT5 W LOfJ»S LAKE Yfti 55354 TOTAL BATCH ,003 00014 k.r *I »’.5 I *'t - l. i i/i- h.'; «• .*!' .•... •• -K*' '’’‘.Vi. * ' ' ! »1 ' V' t ■ n.orJSt,"MI?'.’■•'VI^4?2I 1m .'•J'C ■"Sr I*I ^ ri ■•i' wi’ : ' ift/Ij- '-lySi■K V'7' :''CiWi^ Mm f % r^Vi “:■''Kci;''-;' ..•,»:■ ’■•Vf:,i;!;-'r^lr" • ' < :.;.•‘:>b:::• ■'■ .' • ...: -i , ♦ . •: . ■ ' . •t.'.>,'i i'-A:' »» ; •v: .V.;;^vv.. . • ■ ♦I; ^ '. • iS: V;. 4'^^>1 ^ ^ n’ * 1/br V, *ii'vj : . - »sst-‘ iv' ■: I ‘ HEf»€PlN COUNTY rtWYfUTV INFCWMATIOM SYSTEM W(B»ERTY (WC8S LIST iREROHr NO. I>I<«S540!,- »? • PAIX * • •>rAi«. * ** ■ ’ M '‘■V 55^0i* ' • T,| ,t’ ^., •f •. •,■*•' ... I S'* -■■„ <4i.." ,.'.f' ■ j V* *J * i “/4 »i- , * »>V)>1 j X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRISlkTtO ARE AN ACCURATE Afio TRUE , • REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE (IN THE RECORDS OF THE HEFWEPIN CO-JUTV DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATlONi TQ THE DEST OF rtV KNONLEDGE AW BELIEF./ / I 1 • yi DATE • • • •■ r:- :: ■ m if “a- i'u...sOid'7:: tif ■:’ 'h '/’ >■'VSI!"Lj' • iV *'mi, Iw.• »H,‘ 'M <F *• •■ * I 1!Ifik P-. TO''-if *1? wi Jpiii"-' i i. ' j v.itl ;.’ i 111 ar.sa't*iM'ka&p•■' a'iSi' i ^ :| •■■I 1 ■:% I // " ' I; Jp^- -I ~ .: .• '(l It: : ■•(•.'►I • :>.'!.i ^''334.52weas.; | (fr o'2'°1 §1^03 a % ^ (/) I OB So> 8S 'I I 188.9'„ N 02*19'{)0' , ‘.I V A iP ■^:i I CO 4^!:^So o:-sogaO i; ).•;■!• ■ W 1• i '/V ^ V 02®19'00” E *iiA ^ ________ B l"1: Jiiii s IB I#1’Ita "— 231.71 meas. TORRENS CASE NO. 17100 232.24 X \ \ T ■ Z bI r• • «»• ;• / I 4 -221.87- . . -----:»f t1 £ .li ■ hi. ■ * * I iw! 0-* * “O -» m VI :o 8 —is 2 Ss :dm 2(/) C 2m SI 2m sm 5?m to8 5?n i, 2 Ssm> C/) 11 • — ^ ________ X m l! I sm 8 % 2i S! m II 5 s I R? 2 S 2 (/) 2 S E? 5 — t. • ^ o I o 8 8> T1 ' : 1 !•. •■■■'lifi r / * f' m »• / Cl TV OF QRONO>J city of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -513__________ ' • used for the installation of th. ^con»t-cticn^ ^sl;t.°^Avenro responsible for tbe Enforceof the approved traffic pattern. 3. prior to the “ ° j^Jdivider* have completed documents and em'nt or petition agreeing to paythe execution of an ‘^ree^entbe ins«l“led”'or nea'r Highway'l2 by the City. 4. outlot D, a portion of **/VhVVroperty^°sh^l^ Within the commercial zoned p t Outlets E or ror"\\%‘^dVv\r^P^m^nt “;Ttfe wear pr^^^^^^ fht wta “ pr%%\\;'.“"7u”3ec7to the approval'of the City). 5. The aforesaid ^n o'r bef<?/e*January 10, 1900 with the Registrar copy of this resolution toget.het with a ef^ements'^Ld covenants noted :E^v^e!^=Th%"^ex=e°lu\Von°'of ^ =ivYde“n'ce°-th"at sSbd^vid%V.^a's"la ‘’ti*s\red all conditions set forth in this resolution . The approval ^ren^?lttil"rbVn"ec»^a1:y^to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 10th day of July# 1989. ^^^jorothy Hallin» City Cleric ‘i-s-R.'Grabe£_S«>y°'' Page 4 of 5 9 ' urrftExnnr to Av~:vnzsk'9 ss%^Ti^::^ 0. Stt«r* Barfcari Ketara. as fs* cwr..T3 ziSianay D. sa=ars anu —- -*7"- -- - --?; • V.-.VTAV A‘T,r.“u^r,v-. of Crcro and Batars Cor.sTr’-rticn Co. i cor«rruction of A and Plan S IS|?rc%esanta as scr?vi *-««inruFon cutlets D. E ard F- T^.ay acknoal.dga t>.At a SuHots V E and F ara saparata parcalm and can ia la? ItlillU a^id cutlets cannot b* dav.lspad by t.'.oi. auccaisors or assigns, without furt.har approvals frea t.ha O' • * C c?ri« * • in s- itnr j srat 1 Ciiy T • • « 0«s * Orono. STATE cr MI.SNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HEKNEFIN ) Notary russ.-.,:... . 3TATS or MINNESOTA ) ) as.. •* '* • * > f9 ,. • *•^>V \.- OUliTY cr HIUVNKPIN ) baCcra This instrusant was drafted by! LEONABO, STREET AKO DEINABD (TTW) 150 south rirth Street Suita 2300 Minneapolis, Minnaseta 55CUI r r. 1 H i 't-i •ic ce / v»V/U 20403S0 ■\ — trn ni*C* ARATiCU '** COVE?ir»?»TC! # ria« MiD Z7.scnttn:- rr;n susAn wcc=t« CO?CDXTIOWS, IlcST I I5tl« cl^y jC r:»pt<ini'«r, 1??? THIS rir.J^T AhCNDMpn aS ninn«iiotA corpcrntirr. (t!;o ey n-b«r* ccnstrxirt^on , Inc , ■’. • ;^”cri?ircorp“<^Vtlcn [u| »m. Th, .on-, tlaticnal Associctien (’.li« Lenoe* .„. ccury-i... und ’:a*«»«nt'i tor ''*^9*^ cft*.c« of t'n« i!cm>opui !»•> “» Oc^uno.n i.o.:0J37.-. . ■ 0. 7„. .................. County. Minri«5ota, legally -'•-' »4» •lots 1 t!irouqli 5. UlocK _ Lots 1 through 6. nicT|: 2; Lots 1 thiouqh 5, , ,Lots 1 through M. OlocK ■», ot.cl^ f^. outlots A, D hrd C; •- - * • C-- Ai-‘°r‘ a!.. t?i«r«for. <1* ^ n y * i** 4 4 ^ • '^ * A= ••>’C-C„= .,.. 038,9 rr" :^’“1:;/l,!a.,.'r.. svo,3:-.. - -- - -• ii^n.''" VcT-t:r'r,",°(»r=° oicuA^nt .r„ .. . . . . . T.ota and Outlets In Gugnr Woods.Ii?i“;nd Outro\.7n sugar Woods. C. •».' Quit Claim uedo dated *,V ’ - • CC'lce of th» and^2038ri7 .the Ah-.oclat io:> ac'rnf.' 1989. au Document WOCOC.fe« Utlo to CutlotD A. D. C aivJ J. -nd *^!lO ill •■*•*• F. Th^ Oeclarant. tc -.ubject Outlot 0. 5UCA.1 WOOhr.. .o .ho t u. *IUJCV.U ^ r .MOW, TIlzncrCHn. th<» Declaration in !>or*-L'\ - - 4-... .*.....> ‘“Ar .1 :i *. r.^ i II wi\i-l • ..................... oth€rwi««. AND :^^I0R TA:<ES paid u.=T cf pwcu*-:« iM t r.tccfcf TPANLi FN’’CRE0 SEP 21 ISia ,^HlNtPlN COUN^f MI^N. ^w*f'ty A *. I I i 3.5 Property Nq_;_i - This 45 .=re groupin, is currently under rwo ownerships wish the majority of it toned rural residential single 10 acres abutting Highway 12 are currently family. Approximateli lo roned 3-1 residential business district. All but approximately 3 acres of this are under a single owner. Typical concerns for this property include access to Highway 12 and North Brown Hoad for safety at the North Brown Road and together with the concern for - y Highway 12 intersection. Discussion of Alternatives - alternative No. 1 - Present loning If this property were to develop as it is currently guided and toned, it would result in a narrow strip of commercial uses along Highway 12. However, since these businesses will be restricted from direct access off Highway 12. some form of frontage road will need to be provided. If this area were to be served by a frontage road adjacent to Highway 12, it would represent an expensive solution to this problem since^hi. ro.d_^ would only be developed on one side.;;i^|g mm •X*X'X'X; p4 . . -•4 N . w*.Area 4 & 5 Fig. 30 ■ \ • .4-- I ri' iI L Alternatiive No. 2 - Alternative 2 would allow for business/co^eroial abutting Highway 12 to be served by a remote frontage road that would eventually extend over to Willow Drive. The north side of this would provide for „ulti-residential with the bulk of the northern site developed at the unsewered 2-acre residential. Connection of the single family to Pine Ridge Lane is optional, and would be eliminated from consideration m exchange for frontag between North Brown Road and willow Drive. ^ < -^ k.%.z-:\ Fig. 31 r i: f i T tIf*k .r I I j ,1 ^» i: 5i i / nurn- —■— '» ~ Propertz.r>tjners Proposal - At the beginning of the process, the owner submitted a scheme for development of the property, which was subsequently amended by the owner during the process which provides as shown in Figure 32 for: A) A combination of land 2 acre single family lots on the north portion utilising municipal services. The two acre single family are used to buffer the 2 acre unsewered lots to the north and west. B) The southern portion does provide for a remote frontage from Brown Road west to the western edge of the property. Property Owner Proposal Area 4 Fig. 32 1- .1 *i i ■ 1 Reconunended Alternative “ The recommended alternative, which is includes a further extension of the limited/office commercial business district back from Highway 12, with a remote frontage road on the back portion of this district similar to figures 31 and 32. Prior to the development of the commercial portion of this property, the existing intersection at Brown Road and Highway 12 shall be improved so that safety concerns associated with the current use and future increased use of this intersection are addressed. Configuration of the frontage road and North Brown Road would be determined at the time of development. Frontage road access to Highway 12 could either be opposite Brimhall Avenue in Long Lake, and/or on Willow Drive opposite the frontage road between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road. The property north of the commercial area would be single family with sewer and water planned for the area. With sewer rind water services available to the property, the owner could submit a 1 and 2 acre mixed single family density alternatives for Council consideration. The maximum allowed density acceptable would not exceed that outline in the alternative 3, subject to utility availability, appropriate density, buffering, etc. The residential area would be served by a cul-de-sac or circular road off Brown Road with no connection to the west if the frontage road is installed. § It i i- interceptor is the Maple Plain/Long Lake interceptor, a force main that exists within corridor. As is noted on page 28, it is anticipated that this MWCC force main will not be utilised for service in the area, with scr:e noted exceptions. This is in part based on the fact that Orono was in opposition to installation of the subject force main, and the fact that the operating capacity of the line, will probably allow for only 50 units for that section between Old Crystal Bay Road and the Long Lake pump station. The anticipated net increase in units for this area will be in the range of approximately 500 (600 total units in the Medina/Orono/Long Lake line, minus 116 units currently allocated <to the City of Orono). It is anticipated that the net addition of 500 units will not be of significant impact either to the interceptor system discharging to the Blue Lake Treament Plant nor to the plant itself, given that this change would be while there are upgrades anticipated at the Blue Lake plant. 3. transportation One of the primary goals during this study was that any altered development should be of a nature that would pay for improvements to the corridor. The primary improvements would be installation of frontage roads both to the north and south of Highway 12, together wirh improved intersection control, at least at the intersection of Willow Drive and Highway 12. The intent is to keep local east/west traffic off Highway 12 as much as practical, to provide local traffic with at least one more intermediate control point for crossing Highway 12 at Willow .Jt Drive, and to liniit direct access on to Highway 12. Additionally, by providing retail services and housing in close proximity to the existing arterial, transportation demands on other transportation corridors should be diminished. It is anticipated that the general transportation needs will be within existincr capacity and that this development will not exacerbate existing problems with the system. It is anticipated that this development should pay for the local cost of improvement, at least the intersection control points together with pa>*ment of a substantial amount of the frontage road improvement (less any appropriate MSA funding for such roads). c»«« o« 04 Otese 1 V ' • V. a* V Nf >4 : -A ■Pr r * / m .v\ • •im I grr^rtr loifa IntwiTMdiat* Art«hail • •••» Mnar Arterial Existing Signal ( J Proposed Signal Proposed Road (primary) City of Orono HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY •74A0T 1SS4 AvarsgaDiiy Trpa Wsstam Portion Proposed Transportation System Fig. 35 AININO .L I ^ ' io y ' t- I tr"- - ^ 3§^L:b>^r^ rtty7 **< ^ fJ^^wyMrf fcM. r«H>3£ri ; »u*ii'i 8cl ^:r« jfli:'^: ;r ^■■:-. it 'i^' ^%ll m:. ■Sf'j. 1 ®!:. ; *\w ' ' / iy.w . iri ,:.>*• vi-,:® H--^TA ii-rliS’-i; ' lj . I. .1 ,,j;{ . . 4i 5'^' % ZiLfiL '^ ' * 2 _?>LIL \V i» *• K6V na ^ ?>?,73 1 •! I 4Vin» i» a? & p O r 111.3^ A . . iC«;, ■• •■ 5 ' •■ ,■. g :■ ;'-!;rS ?/\ '.i?i.Y • * ‘ ’iT* '• ' ■ .' ■< ‘ »•^ . •; ••:. -4V • •■ . - V t 15' ;.i'Rf ■ B .4* b.y>m £. 11143 • J - * T^? 4t ” 3H • ••■BR9WH-RtHf- nro » y 3V04 Ik -if S91.7 * 3 ♦ • «.»»••••••••••••••*••••*• r>>, ;’ ■■■• '< <<»? !’ • »’i •>i Mil?' j:; -'Ij'- •; ;,, iit i; •ifiF I- /•*\%......... ’V -A^'i;!•••.:: ' ifef'i ft;' ^ •i: ' f. r! o> • •iiii-.: •, •li.'*''l \I ' . -Jl.-.* ..I ijH'-i,.. ..,..‘,1 ...,M|-.V . -V|,-•#:•■, • ; * ■ ‘ i, . 'J, j , r“ ■ V;. ■ i •d mJC •I.-11 ' . j ;■ •: f » riAY *« i,■•Kii ,;■'■!’!■. ■ <XfW.:- ^r. ; ’ t I , ‘ f-'f'-U i'.' . / •: :Vjir<.vi!ii 1 «l . . , * .'. w ‘ ‘ • t 'IV, '.(A ’ U‘q *"tv: 1:'.5- 1 ifK STARKEY RCXAD •• ?. ( V -1. - •.XV/'iS-l’.ss 03 5 ^ ill: i W«ar Wear Lone N. K • m KM . A l ''V.\ I ‘ »CRYSTAL ■ (!/« r-'Mll:-0;l m ■; iii’r fjm «c:v f-. i:> > gAY * • I • *■RCVVD TRAIL-, ill' .J V/A/^Ooldan View!,. '! |r;|''! |i‘:m .i/j '* OfOly ^1- ’VjO| •r .'ll I, a '•I' Vit'! tfl-ii!l!;'!.,...... f-!''I nnrwuM •^'«l ■£ • 'r':])'..;- ■ ■ f Country Sid® HACK V/LLQW » I.>iy\[ .’ijV 1 1 ipt :5i:r' '; 51{' ENOVLE lAflRi^jGTQ^4 iSlilWOQfl t l ong loUt Cr t fiC \D 'MW. • .i i L :: . , . ^ 9!!V if.>'<■'.' ■ is •■' V' .ii oijrwT Uuaiti. VIEW r n ^TA?,lARft f! 'U-WIt!:)! m VlRCyN«A AVE •V IV '.■tJ !'-• • • :dj’i' U\i .■' .'I'. •■i;;.v m. ..;f ‘''AORCHARD'’ ' i'lM .iiiw vUi rc,a,70 iVf t /.) Bi'll .ij?;,i dili® •''■■!/I'itl'*••4 If. .T-Vilj !>l ii(i Viv, 'JV!-1 1''; ■HV fan^tv%ood fU iKnoli:'Mono! 3' S'-t' r' UJPR>D ORDINANCE NUMBER 64, SECOND SERIES an ordinance amending SlTHfN'THrCIT^REGONlD LEGAL hESCRIPTION OF A rr^w FROM RR-IB TO R-IA ^«,T«»/-.rr nr "PP CIT^' OF CRONO ORDAINS: TEE CITY COUNCIL OF *KE Li*- u- s-xw ^ « 1 -"he municipal code of Orono is hereby Sec.ion official coning'map and zoning use Ifstfict bLndAesilr property legally described below. nmn^rtv located In the east half of the That part of P qAo^inn 34 Township 118^ Range 23f northwest quarter o. ^ lying north of a line w'‘^°“y?*ff^*eet so!ih of and parallel with the north drawnCl., - i5^-.eet so _ _ ^ _„r^hwest ouarter o..eaat half of the northwest quarts Section 34. j e r nm ^he RR“13 Rural single ramil/ L%id«t^*aYDlst?iort"o P.-ir Single Family Residentall District. Section 2. This ordinance ‘=® P“^“u\\*fcat"on!^ Laker/Pioneer newspaper and shall be ef.ec.ive upon p Adopted by the City lOth day^of October, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day o 1988. ATTifsT: James R* Grabelci M^yor^^^ othy Mi/ Hallirtf City C.*.erk r Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Associates ymC tr « *f • • 4^n1^ « Pf v^rv^ - krw#^ •€ Engineers A Architects 9m.**409 f *u»*^ ^1 9 c»« ^ •hen**^ f ^iO¥ri. ^ «dbp^ G ^ WtAT V ttsr^’ C • • “•4ne«c • •! vr • jc*t*?^ f 'f • 'A «C^ *t "#w4J s? ._>i»kr4 ^ Mr-r ^ »uijp« * * VijM A Hjrvjn ^ 9 9jl. ^ V •"'•4 ^ C • m**99 C M t %AMHd •! r ^**»*%i** 9f k.n J ^'Q9^rm 9f October 21, 1994 T AiuP*«0nn ff tt Pf OerNM c §u<^M •! • ,^<lo »f . Pf %*^jr Vj^'T Pi « 4 wp4 ff mj9% pf itire • '»sr Pf *»<rv A •*€ •Jt4 - ^ P Wi«n«r j f Jijpnr^ p #ci P| 9^ ^ CP<M«P>‘ *’f w« r * ^ *f f Pf , C -. •! 44«»^ , A •'! Ci#\ r UnwPfi Pf t .iHX; •! r>84lfM4 . 9f IfvjM** C G«.ujrsor Pf C0LmO^ Pf PH4 G *"PuP» Pf ,.CP^ • CiOPJPT Pf 4 £ „ »W^ wP-J V g»4>PS«» Hinjr^ M CfW^ « l''^<pe*or Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 mm • » . • OOT 24 1994 Re; Pro Tire & Exhaust File No. 139-1975 Dear Jeanne, We hax'e recently received comments from Mr. Glen Ellis at Mn/DOT regarding the propo«d access to Highway 12 for Outlet E. He has indicated that as part of the Highway 12 Mfety imptoNcnient project scheduled for 1995. a curb cut to the lot would be Ptosnded, if approved by the Citv. The safety improvements will likely require additional right-of-way along the north side of Highway 12. Mn/DOT will determine the construction limits and approach the property o\^ner if the existing right-of-way is not adequate. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. _ . *Z). Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. / 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 r V TO:Chair Schrocdcr and Oroix^ Planning Commiision Nlembcrs Ron Moor?c, City Adrninistraior FROM; Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Adminhiraior DATE:November 15. 199^ SLBJECT: #1979 Ridu.u Little. 1890 Shady\*(xxl Road - Variances - I^iblic He.iring Zoning District: LR-IC requiring 21.780 s.f. or 1/2 acre in area. Total area of property » 38.233 s.l. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03. Subd. 14(C) - Review of siructural coverage. Allowed = 5.735 s.f. or 15 Existing = 3.907 s.f. or 10.2% Propos^ « 3.907 s.f. or 10.2% if the deck is replaced in its present dimensions (lot coverage facts wtxild not be altered if expanded deck is approved as deck would not have railings). Sectit»n 10.22. Subd. 1(A) - Lakeshore setback variance (review Exhibit O). Required = 15' Existing =71 ’ Proposed » 71 ’ if deck is approved in present configuntion Proposed = 65 ’ if expanded deck area is approved refe r to Exiubit J. Section 10.22, Subd. KB) - Average lakeshore setback variance (review Exhibits N and O). The entire I4 ’x26 ’ deck would be located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Section 10.22. Subd. 2 - Review f f’ lrdcover variances. A. 0-75 ’setback area «' li 250 s.f. Existing =' .i.r s.f. or 0.1% Proposed = 11.9 s.f. or 0.1 % if deck approved in its present configuration Proposed = 271.9 s.f. or 2.4% if expanded deck is approved Increase in hardcover = 260 s.f. or 2.3% B.75-250 ’ setback area = 26.983 s.f. Allowed = 6.745.7 s.f. or 25% Existing = 8.056 s.f. or 29.8% Piopo.scd = 8,056 s.f. or 29.8% if deck approved in its present configuration Proposed = 8.225.9 s.f or 30.5% if expanded deck area is approved Hardcover increase = 169.9 s.f. or 0.6%. 7 Zoning File #1979 November 15, 1994 Page 2 list of Exhibits A - Application B - App icant ’s Addendum C - Property Owners List D - Plat y \p E - Hardco.er Site Plan F - 0-75* Hardcover Facts Based on Replacement of Existing Deck G - 75-250’ hardcover Facts Based on Replacement of Existing Deck H - 0-75* If Expanded Deck Approved I - 75-250* If Expanded Deck Approved J - Survey Locating Proposed Deck Improvements K - Work Sheet for Expanded Deck Areas L - Deck Plan M - Original Survey N - Approxunate Location of Residences on Adjacent Lots O - Staff Sketch - Setback of Existing Deck/Average Lakeshorc Setback Line Brief Review of Applicatioii Applicant seeks approval of variances to the above referenced sections of the code to allow either the replacement of a former 14’x26* lakeside deck or replacement ot toimer deck with expansions into the 0-75’ and 75-250’ setback areas. The entire deck structure was located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The deck structure was located approximately 71’ from the shoreline. The proposed expanded deck would extend 65’ from the shoreline. The applicant ’s addendum notes that the existing deck is rotting and in a serious state of disrepair. Upon a recent site inspection, staff found that the entire deck has been removed. The surveys of the property have never shown the subject deck (Exhibit M). It is dilticult to confirm the exact dimensions of the former deck but it would appear from the tormer framework and location of a footing that the 14’x26‘ deck was as drawn in proposed site plans (Exhibits J and O). The majority of hardcover improvements on this property are located in the 75-250 setback area. The principal structure except for the lakeside deck met all required setbacks. Hardship Statement Please refer to Exhibit A, the application and applicant ’s addendum, Exhibit B. Statt would add the following: .».jl •I’ rtnirti 4^ \ • CITY OF ORONO - V.\RIANCE APPLICATjpjN ^ Initial Application Fee S200 00 (550.00 per each additional %’ariirxc) Renraal Variance Fee 5100.00 (no change from original application) ^ Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-thc-Fact Fees (Double application fee) rCl rt 'J r\A T • 4 f ifc • • • w* %W • ^ * ^ ' * ^ m - ...... *; 4 V p ■ 4B % % * *•' • w V 4 to • ••V to • V 4 ^ 4 PROPERTY INFOR>UTlON Site Address ig^C 6>H A»)y « % ^UC Auarcs5 Io /c ^T^ t --------------------------------------------;r— Property Idcimficatioix Number (P I P.) |7^ iCgi.^—, Anach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Propeny Acquired —----------------- I ide) ?do^) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of propertv : X residential -----other (specify)------------- Zoning District:---------------------------------------------------------------------- (month/>'car) applicant Name LtTTLi^ Phone (home) 47 I PboneCwork) > 9 ^ Address: |F<)r CtP---------Citv^:,Zip;_£Ei3i OWNTR (if dil'ferent than applicant) Name ___________________ Phonahome) Phone (work)__ Address:City:Zip Estimated Construction Cost $ *4. jTpo — WrttcH I*; RorriM^-^ (4n P PrfN ^----------------------------- ---- (attach additional sheets if neccssarv') Vi\RLANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front X Hardcover Side __Rear Lot Coverage Average [..akeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP'DESCRIPTION of unusual PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical ditTiculty or unusual ® u>r4,Jin C^\JAi.Ue Ttie ---------------------------- required SL'BMITTALS----------------------------------- ................„,^^,i„„ —^ K. ...hmined hv tht apDlication llwd liMAI^ the foUowin£jnfom>»t»onjYu sL^m^^ ^Lr aDPlkati^iiLfeg-£ims«^^ 1. -^1 3. 4. 6. 7. / Completed Applicauon Form 1^5^ from 7* Certified Proper!) 0>.ners List ot Govt Center. 348-3271). Hennepin Counw Department ot FinaiKC. A 60.., oo ^ Plat Map (obaincd with sursevor) and include hardcos-er - in "•n,::trvScwr'provUc one (!) cop/S-.* x UT Ske;ct«_ or plaw of flwr A ^*,0. an interest tn 8. 9. are proposcu. a.. - a views (provide one (l) copy ov:: ^ /• Sketches or plans of Ooor & e .umsl'^of all persons with an interest in the 7" List of the legal “f not current owner(s). APPLICANT'S SIGNATLRE information required or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees to provide not covered by original fee payment) Administrator, agrees to pay add,uonalf:«(su^ ^^„,rtes that dte and/or consultant expenses ^ his/her knowledge, information supplied ts true and correct to Ute Ms -/PA DateApplicanfs Signature _/ A UtU----- OWNER’S SIGNATURE application and furdier authorizes reasonable The owner hereby a'‘‘"°*^f'\“.f consultants, agents. Commission members, and Counci Owner's Signature _/ ^ r • —— Applicant must have all submituls MoSay oi each moo*^ s/eU. natuung Comtmssion ^ m are rave /teT? S'_0a/ AppIkLts m'uTte S’^enis:bri»s.S “ - ..u,« *«o».» this change prior to the meeting. I r ►*- October 5. 19^4 #1 979Jeaofic Mobusth Buxklmg & Zoning Adn«iuitrat» C ity of Orono p6 Bo x 66 Cryslii Bay. 55323-0(te6 Deal Janrc add additional deck Enclosed is nn Vanance ApplicaDoa and associated documentation My request fox a buildmg permit to replace aa existing deck and potenfiall> wis denied on ^vpccjnbcr 27, 1994 If possible, 1 would appreciate receiving a vanance which would allow me to r^lace the rotted out demand add additional deck area as shown on Exhibit G If th^ is not . aDorcciatc rccciv mg a vanance to at least replace the old ifcck which would then have railings all a^Lid (not shown OT drawing) If the additional deck area could be ax^. most ol the railings I have enclosed a number of Exhibits ( A thru I) winch show toul hardcov^ calculations for both of the scenarios desenbed above I realize that September 23 was the deadline to get on the agenda for the Octoba P Planmog Commission mcetmg, however, if at all possible. ccuU the 25 day waiting penod be waived w that Uould still get on October 17 agenda Then, if the vanance is allowed, constnicuon could begm before the siww flies Your cooperation is appreciated. Please call immedati:ty if >-ou need additional infonnatioo Sincerely, Richard L Little 1890 Shadywood Road Orono. MM 55391 471-7875 (home) 559-2613 (work) All MTt tATCM sm mmtPim mmrr rnmnn r^nmirtm systihMQKITY OmEKS LIST Km? m. n^iSMi^ACf IIcfHP AOM «MCII TAVATia:/i M 17-117-21 2a M92 0IS7S SHAinnas to GAN TILIOTSON Kim a TXLLOTSQNU7f SNAOY»«»o aa NAT2ATA ffl SSIYI la 17-117*21 2a MGl tOGSa AGDK» ifussit?ca c a tiiiorsoa^ a miorsaN GLim a micrrsoN iGTi SHAGYNoco aamT;tATA m ssiai SI 17-117-11 la GUMiaiMG snadynoog aa auatcoa A TAYioa OLGA N TAtlOalaaa shaoywog raNAYZATA rti Uiai Vifccaaca MiniTAXaAYCamm/AGn sa 17-117-21 la aou aaasa aaoKss iMAssiGNia COrm LANDINGS corrit LAWINGS a722 N lAia MILLS »i KXNNITONKA NN UiaS la 17-117-25 la aoia ooasa ADOKSS unassimtsi corrit LANDINGS comi LAWINGS a722 M fAia MILLS MO HINMirQMU m SS145 sa 17-117-25 la aaia oiaaa smagyndoo toMata? QHLif HILLUn A aMQNOA OHUE laaa snAarmoo ao NAYZATA m isinimTANMAYia•/M 17-117-21 2a aoifaiaao sfumncoo na L LITTLE ADA LITTLK a I UTTLI ADA LITTLElaaa snagymoog aoKYZATA m ssin sa 17-117-n fa oifia smoYMooG aoJ a nCHANUS A H I TULLY J i NCNANUS AMI TULLYina sMAovMooa aoMTZATA m SS5A1 sa 17-117-21 2a M21 aiYio SNAOYMOQO aa J A a L GASTiaLAND JAN a CASTfaLAMO 1Y20 SNAOYWOO M NAYZATA HN SS5ai 05 . # ‘ • ■ 1 i ■ *(MCR TM9AVCII NMC/AOm M 17-117-2S » 0022 01«S0 SMAiVMOOe » MVXO A ILHOUXST MVXO A KLHOUISr i«SO SMAOYMOOD AO NAYZATA HN itSYL % TOTAL iATCS s» iKuiia i' V-ir*. . ♦ 4-1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RCRRESENTEO AR| AN ACCUiUTt AND TRUE iREnESENTAnON OF INTOmATION AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE ON THE RECOROS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF RMRERTY TAXATION* TO TM DCST OF HY KNOHLEOGE AND RELIEF. DATE ■ AZJi— ,A... • I, ?l 1 » 1# % ) — ^-------- '0 (38)«r '53 n •' fS'ir r\!j r ^ ' SBSf /i J ’ = TSS^^ c = 31.d' at 0 ^ 1^1 5 P- T) - iL.a' X 'i ) •=■ zr& 5.^ -1 1I ^ ri /3 J *- 14' y;-^,' = %H f< - A«''o" / ^ ns-^.r 'Vc>T(\L - 7,0(»s 5,f=: z.^55 S.r IW o' Zo^e: 11-^ TcT^L ik) 7:Z ‘-Z^0' Zc*:€T f/JS'i.! £J.F. ^nii III nwHifftyii !<KfLACL ) '*• IL\RDCO\'ER C.\LCIXAT10N WORKSHEET fi SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE aNX)7f*:so ’25-500*SOO-IOOO* EXISTING HARDCONXR IN ZONE A. House S.F Le=r*Widiii !T, X & S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Carafe C. Driveway X X S.F S.F. D. Skkwalk X X S.F. S.F. E. 'ffMMrDeck ^4*X X S.F S.F. F. Landscape Uci^laia Bv PlasQC X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Otter S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER LN’ ZO.N'E TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A // f - B fl? PROPOSED HARDCO\XR IN ZONE A. House _______________ * Ih 2-^0 xlOO - (sJo C.HAfi6|E - o. I S.F. S.F. % ABav€) S.F. Lcoffii Width X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage S.F. C. Dnvcway X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalic X X S.F. S.F. E. -P»o/Deck 1.4'X X tf.9 S.F. S.F. F. Lacdscape Uaderlam Bv Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Otter S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE • A /A 9 ^ B _JJJ^ iM.S.F. S.F. X 100 I % vf -'3 Z'* ' *\t 4 'i B A B r 'I hardcover calclxation worksheet SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) »-"S’ ^5-25^^ ppsTTNG fLA,pncoVER IN ZONE A. House --------------------- *---------------- SO&-K LMftt WidSi B. Garass C. Driveway D. Sidewalk !£. PatiovDeck F. Lasdscafw Underlaifl Bv Platfic « X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.V S.F. S exMior A S.F. S.F. O. Other ai TOT.M, hardcover LN zone TOTAL PROPERTY .\R£A IN ZONE A r os-c. - B A Widtti X X % B. Garage C. Dnvcway D. Sidewalk E. Pario/Deck F. Landscape Underlam By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X total hardcover in zone TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ________________ * ® ■ ‘183 S.F.B * 100 -% i• same:45 S.F. S.F.tjt t, *S.F. m S.F.%J m _ S.F. S.F. *S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.A S.F. ft B X 100 ^£fLf^c€: Oec/C hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 75-ZSQ’25-500*lOM* yiyiSTING HARDCQ\TR in ZQNXl A. Howe _________ - Uaffl X X % B. Gange C. Dnvewiy :s S D. Stdewalk X X iwDeck 2.ci»X F. Landscape Uoderiais Bv Plastic X X X G. Otiier X TOTAL H.ARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in zone A //.^ - - B . PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Lcnftii % X X B. Garage C. Dnveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Jtecio/Deck /o a * X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other JL 20 X 100 Width 2- ±Lqf TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - A 27/.<> -i- B .X 100 S.F. S.F.• ••S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.• S.F. • * • m S.F.f S.F.% m S.F.• S.F '•"AV m S.F.Vx ^ m S.F. S.F. //.f S.F.A //. 2.C?S.F.B -t S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. s S.F. li.f S.F.ir'i a fX^O o _S.F. (PtoPd%i£C^ S.F. /f^ O! r/j/ S3 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.A //. 2.SQ_S.F.B J.v % habdcov 'er calculation worksheet setback ZOMU (CIRCLE aNT) 0-7S ’ N< A. House X X X B. Garaf® C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk:X X E. Pitio/D«fc X X F. Laxidsc^ Uoderiain Bv Plascc X X X G. Othc; TOTAL H.APDCOVER IN ZC TOTAL PROPERTY' AREA IN ZONE B A. House LenftH X X X B. Garage C. Dnveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. ^Mie/Deck F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic X X X (^75-2^ZS-500*sod-iooo* a S.F.'x a1 S.F. SJ. S.F.i* S.F. m S.F..8 m S.F. S.F.S7t • S.F./9 fli S.F. SB «• ■ • S.F.. S.F.w .. .w - S.F. S.F. . ’•• .*s# sF.y/ 4 m T oFt0>S.F.A u 2^ #ri S.F.B X 100 »J4.T4.% ^ oF PLs^% 5- @0 S.F. Widdi S.F. ifli S.F. IS S.F. S.F. S.F. s S.F. S.F. s S.F. ^ F S.F. s S.F. S.F. “--------------------------------- S.F. S.F.S3 S.F. G. 0±er total HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ^ ^-r B m 2^<?g5 _ X 100 » _S.F. a^. S.F. *6 A B 30-ST r 2. f)4te •in !»? - 1 s __-^'- V \V ; 1211 ; V a i\- <• V y 1 \ -^ " 1 w* 1 ^•AC V - 1 • • « «f Ml l*.' ( M) i 4. f;-. (0 \•fev 23 y>* • ^ \f^h 1 *' '• :* y • A^:* • • ’ ^ 1 \ % j «5'^^ ;; / ^ / e A> i iS V - > \\ (*T ♦>Wi3 \ : ; ^OhiJ y C4)^ ' ^ -» \ • lO - 3“ * V*,j‘V‘*»/ i«l ' IC <V - ' “ *•- 9 ____• 0 (XI •53 ;3 ’ IcS '—•VAJ i (49) , :. - • 2^ r*' ^ A ViiiAi—£\ ■^'Od3 — Vrp-Mrrr-;',.,fe;:'^- ■ r 4 ■^•., ti t; . ,:v;.-„,.^ •5SS>»“ ► » - fcv- r--:rc"r-®* _._ T» cces r.o^A *=' “ ,/• ,r../, th^recr.. hr.d.!i r«^ ^xilr.i-rSf *• *V'» .r ,-v. frcn cr cc sa-- tlcn 0. a —_- .^c-oarhrents, ir '••-» i—ro'/er^^-^ ®- Scale : Data : 1" =: AO’ 9-5-73 Iron sarVca ^on CcS* in vo.-on . pi^»>x*er ,nd SuJ'-'e/0‘ ana rta 0, 6 I^ne Lak«, Mlr--.«s<=-» (■ ■ r n i TO:Chair SchfoeJcr and Orooo Plamunj: Ci>mmis>ion Mc.nhers Ron Moof«. Cit> iXdmimstrafor moM Jeanne A. Mabusih. Bui’ding & Zoning Admmmmor DATE:Scr% ember 16. 'ftiFnT; #19S0 A T Dcvelofwnent. 460 Park Avenue - Nariance • Public Hearing Zooinc IHstricf: LR-IB. lakeshorc rcskkmial requif nf I acre in area Toul area of propcrt>' » 25.000 s f. Pirrfliirnt Ordinances Section 10.03. Subd. 6(A-D • Existing lots of r©:ord need only meet 80*5 of K>t vxidth and lot area staixiani. Section 10.24. Subd. 5(B) - Lot staralards LR-IB A. Area Minimum lot size “ 43.560 s.f. or I acre Required * 34.848 s.f. or .8 acres (SO^tli E-xistinc « 25.000 s.f. or .57 acres VaparK'e “ 18.560 s.f or 42.6% B Lot width = 140* Required * 112’ or S0% Existing * 100’ or 71*5 Variance " 40’ or 28.5% i.ist of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C • Property Owner*s list D - Survey E - Topographic Map F - Map of Developed IaHS G - Gustafson Report 11/15/94 H - As-Built Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of a lot area and lot width variance to allow property to be -"sidentially developed. .Applicant has not provided a development plan for the site and merely seeks approval of the variance to resaired lot staiKlards. Review Exhibit F. note the subject property at 25.CKX) s.f. is consistent with the areas of developed properties within the Miimetonka Summit i Zoninz Flic #1980 Ncrv ember 15. Pa^ : P«lt neichbothDoJ. In f«:« propenies to the imiDediate v«th and immediate west are all at :5.ooo s'.f. Review FAhihil K. .ewer is avtulahle at Kwh the east and west sides of pt^^eny. A >e»^ ctmnectHtn can be made at either of the stubs A sewer unit has alretwly heen pakl tor the property. E^h of the srparaic fiMjr lots was chargal a quaner unit. Review Exhibits E and G. Gusufson reatfirms that draLnagc flows predominately to tbs cast, lie perccisTS no impact on adjacent residence. The propeiiv is htwinded by Tonkawa R.-ad on the east side and Park Avenue on the west and is defined ai a through lof. Applicant and future owner should be adviad thtt the etKie will require a conditional use lor construction of accessor) stnicmrcs. Gustafson’s report. Exhibit G. aduses that the approval of this site for develop^m in three residential units being sersed by the unimproved publn: righl*of-wa>. He calls tor development of a public road at a 24’ width with a turn around at the north end. This will Ik a difficult feat since the City only has a 30’ right-of-way for Park Amrnc. Staff would recommend that applicant be responsible for continuing the paved road at the present width and providina a turn around or loop driveway using portions o! the 50’ public nght-ol-way. Applicam shall include the turn around w ith the final plan for development of the site review bv the City Engineer. Applicant has discussed the potential of achieving ac^-ss ott based on the final location of the house on the site. If is doubtful whether tfu: County will a ow a new curb cut at the Countv road when other access \< available. The engineer has also asked for the granting of drainace and utility easements akmg the boundaries of the propeny and additional richt-of-way for the County road. Ihe City does not request drainage and utility casements or“require the granting of right-of-way when reviewing variances. Such requests are valid during subdivision reviews. \s applicant has presented this application without a final development plan, approval of the variances must be based on future development meeting required setbacks ol the LR-IB zoning district and for the through lot as follows; 35’ setback for Park Avenue 35’ setback from Tonkawa (County Road 135) 10’ side. The property is IcKaied within 500-1.000’ of lakeshore and is allowed 35S^c hardcover. Issues for Consideration A. Is the proposed building site consistent with the historic and current pattern of development of the Minnetonka Summit Park ncighlxirhtwxl? r Zoning Fik #1930 November 16. 1994 Pace 3 Are there anv uraisaal she charactcrhttc^ or barriefs that 'aoulJ restrict hcvelopmem* What IS the Planmns; Ccnimis'ion** recommendatwn concemirtg the upcnuling of Park Avenue that would now ^rve a total of three rcsiderttial units? D. Otter issues raised by the Planning Commission. A recommendation of approval must adoress ite fonowing ch 2. 3. 4. Ijegal combination of the four pn>penies prior to tbc issuance of 3 building pcmui. Upon application for a building permit, applicant to provide; a. Detail grading and drainage plans. Resolve of required access uperades/iraprovemem for Park Avenue--to either upgrade to a 24’ paved road or paved extensivut at the existing paved width with a loop turn around provided w ithin the subject pn^rty. Final plan for access to site must be reviewed b\ the City Engiiscr. b. All fumre development to meet standards of the LR-lB Zoning District. Per Section 10.03, Subd. 10. the lot is classified as a through lot. A conditional use pennit is required for the construction of accessory structures on such a lot. j r crr^ OF ORONO - V.\RIANCE .^’FLICATION Ini'uil Applicatioa ret S200.00 (550.00 per each addiuoiul variicce) Renewal Variaucc Fee SlOO.OO (no change frem ongmal applicatica Vanance for non^onfemung scrccnires .Aner-^ne-Fac: Fees (Double apphcatioa <1 r #1 V a * ^ v.“ * w* * t. «r« . k . % V Arach legal description to aepucatton u .*ot ^c.u > Date Procerr-- Acquired^--------------------'»rd ~~ I ,do, own n:e aciactnt pir..is ^ ?:ts«rSrSf?rcce.-r/: o_.. Zoning Dtstr.c::_____ ,^210.I I * V •* • « r- ^ • :r-» * ^ s. i W ♦ • ^ V ^ ^(n2crLr/>‘tar) .applicant Name ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .Address. ^ ^ Photr (tco:o)_£il_5lri Phone (. we rk) Cev:Zip: SN3AI (acuca additional sheea if necessary) V.ARIAN'CES reqltred ^ .Area ____Aiidcn Setback:Front Side Hardcover Re: Lot Coverage A’erage Lakesnore Other (specif:.*) (attach additional sheets if necessary) required submittals ... . hv thf appHcai^pH dca ^ilP^ QKmSL fnr vrmr aPPUcaT TQn tO he CQQSldgr------ 1. • .Application rorrn 1^0’ ‘ vcu xust ctLiin tiiis list trom ^ * .1-1- — j. 4. 5. 5Ss"“ " “” -caicuUtioos as rcquirca. m au rsnrcxiucttoa. nro*'c<ecl eievations) if any changes in exist Jig grade Toposrachic rar.ey , exist Jig a-np ^ ly for rcprccuction. are prepcse.-. .n ^cd.ac • ,rrovide one il) copy 3 i x ). 6. m / . 3. 9. proposed. In one .1) copy 3'A’ x lU). iketenes or pians or r^cor S. -. -^-.ons with an interest m -- List of the iegii of acoiicantis) if net current owccris). prop.:?. Th,. arucp a itparata Us. of any persona As an addendum to this aepn^aLon. veu Wish notiUcd ot :h;s application^ Xchmonai iianas as may be requested by C.r> so... --ae .\onucai: and Preceny 0'*^ AFPLIC.A>T’S SIGN.ATLRE inibrniafon recuued or requested by ±e Zoning The applicant hereby agrees to provide ^y ongmal tee pavtnent) LJL.0. a,re=a -o pay ,«:=,"';:.rArr^ application and certmea that u-.e ar.dyor consultant cofr«:t/o ±e best of his^be: knowledge. Lniormation supplied *s ^-e a^n .Arplioant s Slgnarare — Date OW"NER'S SIGNATCRE acplteticu acd further authories The owuer heteny a«=u. Comttnssion the=bets. and t-0u„cu entry onto the • ^;e;,,jn.oo aid veru'cation of diis request, members rot , ,OL^ Owner’s Signature '' ^ -r-__-'C fh<* Pl^UlDill? 1 ’ -I il 1 .1 • ,T“ISn^PMtSIM laSESL • V Mi MTi )i '. *•ATCM MtA80t BDHtFIH CDUHTT PtOPCTr DfrOWttTIOH STSTtHRTY OMSRS llSrI' -TAWmi1/M w-ni-zi iz MdiOM^O TQNTv/Ua totlOaCt « H tfUmtNGN EQMXN C 111tMMIU C CAGE to MK SfISf HttS m » OS-117-21 12 0002 00440 TONKAM 00 iDMiN C GACI ETAl.GAGE COWIN C izm 0 sTATi mt S5 «tis W 55441 tttOtf WO. 01415401 OACC 1110 05-117-21 12 0005 00520 TOMCAMA 00 ttfHIUH SftVICC COtO CAOLSON OCAl 1STATE CO ATTN TAX DCPT t O Om 5^15#HPIS HN 554Sf-02S0PMt AOM/ IMOl Ntft . TAWtAYfOmm/AxmHa A1.*AimTAKtAYlO1/ Ft PBOP - i.->1* TAXPAYER ; NAHE/AOOfI » noR Aom *1,, ONNiR NAM I-: TAXRAYERi-l mm/urn jr . HAME/AOOR r‘ . • . \ m ■ Q„. • COOCt NAM6 TAWtAYCO M OS-117-21 12 000400010 AOOOCSS UNASSXGNIOCURTIS L CARiSQNCURTIS L CARLSONISO TOWAMA toLONG LAAC NN 5515410 04-117-21 41 000100010 AOmiSS UNA^IGNTO JQNN50N INVCSTHTS LTO RTNRSt JOHNSON INVfSTHTS LTD RTimt C/0 rtAMC S OCRALl SS FARraNCTQN AVC NARTFORO CT 04105 SO 04-117-21 41 0014 00010 AOORfSS UNASSiGNiO JOHN R GCRMAtOSON JOHN R GCtHAtOSON 151 lARIVICW AVC LONG LAKE HN 55154 SO 04-117-21 41 0040 00400 FARR AVE TOOO E A TEtl L NOOO TODO E NOOO 400 PARK AVE LONG LAKE HN 55154 TOTAL lATCN 505 00015 10 04-117-21 14 002000405 TCROAMA tO Etc OEOCH.PH III KAitL A CHRISTirC DEOOLPH C/0 ENUT -EOUPf C PO RON 0410 HPLS HN 5540610 04-11721 Hi 001000010 Aimt'^ UNASSICRCO JOHNSON INVCSTHTS LTO PTNtSP JOHNSON INVCSTHTS LTO PTT4HSP C/0 FEAIO( S OEEALL 55 FAtniNGTON AVt HAETFORO CT 04105 18 04-117-23 4t 0015 00010 ADOtCSS UMa$SIO«> JOHN E GEHAEOSON JOHN t GEEHAROSO I 151 LAAEVIEM AVE LONG LAKE m 55154 10 C4-117-21 41 0042 00471 TONRANA EO 0 L FEIT2 APE FRITZ DAVID L FRITZ 471 TONEAHA RO LONG LAKE m 55154 10 04-117-:S 41 0002^010 ADDRESS UNASSIGFCO JOHreON INVCSTHTS LTO PTNRSP JOHNSON 1»4VESTH7S LTD PTNESR C/0 FRANK S OCRAIL 55 FARHINCTON AVE HARTFORD CT 0410510 04-117-21 41 001100010 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHNSON INVESTMTS I TO PTNRSP JOHNSON INVCSTHTS LTO PTNESP t/0 rRAIOC S OCflAlL 55 FARHINCTON AVi HARTFORD CT 04105 10 04-117-21 41 0014 00405 PARR AVE IDONAtO L HEVER ET AL DONALD A CATHERINE HEYIR 405 PARR AV LONG LARE HN 55154 10 04-117-21 41 OlOOi 00450 LINDEN AVE H D DIETRICR-OIOCREE ET Ai H 0 OIETRICR-OLOCRER 450 LINDEN AVE LONG LARE HN 55154 jl CD RUN DATE 0V27/9A BATCH 505 »IEt#<EPIN CCXJNTV PROPERTY INFORMATION CYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. P1455<i0l PAGE 12 % • V *- • % * ■ 'A I •r i."- ^ » * / 'f: * % ' ; « . 4 • i • / ‘ ' ir tO.>>v I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AID TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE Wl THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDCS AND BELIEF DATE \ ■ ■'-V if o. h % ^’1 FRANK R. CARDARELLE (612) 941-3031 Land Surveyor Eden Prairie. MN 55344 Survey For Bob Shank Book 345 Page 4i File #1 u \ 1^' r*^ 9 It"N S Q < O ^ Cv.- 1 T N U \ \ Scale: 1“»40' oDenotes Iron icon, found 1 )) f • I f\ w r\ K J 11 3D mi o ry O *n -n W. j2 cr ’ 133. 5 >i »C9) f rr ^ % ‘2 (30)2 (26) S ? tt4.3 V ^<^.34 14 '.2«li r (72)i: P ,*/ -v,' 2 fe N ^s 135 r : 125Jl2}m ETTf :(¥)S hU.s « h: A-^r 50 ^ i SL . r'/^ M I M JOO 1/11 Bonestroo Rosene «|rv Antfcrtik & |\j| Associates En9lnMfs 4 Afchltecti teV nr*—^«• ^^■oanisum CMO^J*’’y a C-c 0 f-f Jir tcir^ •€• c •• t» torv#*# I •• Cf^ • C=4^ '5 -tx-4l f •cce- : •• V ^ •• •*»-«»• Cj^wu*t November 15, 1994 r“ * «,«<« A «oort « *t ••»* •* MU »i C iUM*« A ;A ,#T7 • »f V4-UP • <%•< 4#^ *-wwr • ^ ••«C'*41 • •/« •• '•w *1 VT*i* • ••w f M • -9 * «T • t ¥#••»-« •« 5 *« M»-» • •P^ •• ;:,-y A \U^#A •€ : S39T?J'' •* ^ f te •• **► i - Ci»vb»' ■€ V»«^e 2 •! • jtrittr •* w Cfvr •• 2 «-»ne^f •! «««A • •• ^ *t r#A-» 5 O-irrwr •• »i •w G »«wr • Co^ •! A i«4«MA „-s M »fwn«e ••4 ' V CW' .r-fi ^ !%f Ml. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 A it T Development File No. 139*1980 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the propced /j,) *Jd‘'e^^o°P«k^^ in th^ located w... of Tonkawa Road (^»y „ engineeringlocated we»t ot lonaawa i*™™ ,'™hination i, acceptable from an engineering joutheait quarter of Section 6. ^ driveway ncce„ for the property rCioc^r^n nrh^:sr.r ........ north end. bfrequhld 3 f«t Wid*. along all lot line, and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of-way,. pleaK contact me at this office if you have any question, regarding this matter, Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSEN’E, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.JL Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2339 tvest HIgnway 31 • St. Paul, VN 5SII3 • 412-636-4600 — ■ t] ■J ■ . ' , mati , % iiyimi!^‘ I- 4 ....7* ;' .1 •' 1 J •; 3^ y y^ \ -v:i- ■,-.:>''.y; ■''‘"‘‘•V’ ‘f i» • \ •./#'. »> ' 1^ K l8^ /r -M m§J * ' ■•> W'" ’ll ?W*L.‘. j'i, >:M ■i/- ; sife* ' » swa dr^-7; -■■ i it t:'4^^'.^s#fe(ilil •1 r ^arijrr ‘ ___ N‘‘ sRSlTAi'''*' BP- •'-.'.•'•ti’ffl'^mhkd.iiLmL. i. ^ • ' •* V If wm Wfil" 4,« i M^. ;.' * i i j- i T ‘ ^ 1 iL.- ‘■* y- ii^'M i yrrf f ».■...■(> ::-7x; 'N ‘sV‘'V' ' \ iff- '•. ‘ ‘ i[ , Ph V y/'.vi ' • • fe' • '^* ‘'x: .■ri.\-. .Si y- p^f^iUP'i'»i p?;'.a ; ,.114... IXT, i: i m Ln m j£m,hlk^ / iM «• , .; S' TC>:Chair SchroeUer and Oromi IManning Commis?ion MemlxTs FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building ii Zoning Aaminisirau>r DATE:November 17. 1994 4^1981 Tixld R. Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane * Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-ID requiring 1 acre in area Total area of property *» 20.900 s.t. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.24. Subd. 5(A) _ , * m A. Ivot area variance granted by Ciry on July 11. 1994. rcter to ResoUmon #3449. Exhibit F. B.Street setback variaiKe Proposal A - refer to Exhibit M-2. Required = 35 ’ Proposed = 25’ (46’ from traveled road) Variance = 10’ or 28.5% Section 10.56. Subd. 6(C)(2) - Bluff setback.s A. Proposal A. refer to Exhibits M-1 and M-2 Required = 30 ’ Proposed principal struemre = 15’ from top of bluff (2’ of structure extends into bluff setback) Proposed access stair and deck = 17’ from top of bluff (18’x8’ of deck located within setback area) B.Proposal B. refer to Exhibits L-1 and L-2 Required = 30 ’ « > wi Proposed principal struemre - major portions of residence located within blurt. refer to Exhibit 0-2 Proposed accessory structure - 8’ from top of bluff, refer Exhibits L-l and L-- List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Neighbor’s Acknowledgment Fonn E - Topographic Map Locating Existing and Adjacent Residences F - Resolution #3449 Approval of Area Variance G - Minutes of Council Meeting 7/11/94 H - Hardcover Fact Sheet 500-1,000 ’ ' ? M Zonin;' File -91981 November 17. 1994 Pauc 2 I - Bluff and Bluff Impact Zorers Defined in Revieu of Application #1911 J - Map of Stakes Placed on Property by Applicant for City ’s Convenience at Site Inspection K1-3 -Floor Plans LI - Site Plan Locating Access Stair Deck for Plan B (Note Not to Scale) 1,2 - Survey for Plan B Improvements Ml - Site Han LiKating Accessory Structures for Plan A • (Note Not to Scale) M2 - Survey for Plan A Improvements N - Footprint of Residence 01-2 - Elevations P - Survev Description of Request The applicant was present during the review ot variance application #1911 that granted the area variance for the undeveloped lot of the recent lot line rearrangement (Lemmerman application). During that review the legal building envelope was defined as shown on Exhibit I. The Council in their approval of the application, directed that this site plan Kvating the legal envelope be included as part of the formal resolution. Applicant has provided two plans for development. Plan A proposes approval ot a street setback vanance allowing structure to be moved further away from the blutf impact zone. Proposal B shows structure "meeting the 35 ’ setback but major portions of the northeast comer of the residence are lixrated within the actual blutf area, refer to Exhibit L-2. Review Exhibits M-1 and M-2, structure although located 25 ’ from the street lot line will actually be placed 46’ from the traveled rtud. Note this placement of the structure w’ould allow the deck and stair to be moved into the approved building envelope at the nonhwest comer. Proposal B although meeting the street setback involves major encroachment of the bluff and the bluff impact zone. As it was difficult for staff to determine lot lines and placement of house on property, the applicant was asked to stake the lot line and building envelope for proposal A for your inspection (Exhibit J). Applicant has also provided a map locating adjacent residences to determine any visual impact, specifically, on adjacent residence to the west, review Exhibit E. In reviewing the elevations and the tloor plans, you will note that applicant has reversed placement of garage. Garage will be at the east side of simcture. The rear elevation sketch by applicant provides the correct elevation. Applicant w ill bring revised elevation sketches to our meeting. .^-!j v«-j> . Zoning File #1981 November 17, 1994 Page 3 The Ie«al buildine envelope is approximately wide by lOOV The strueture will be 78 ’ in len'ih and commJncine at the east end at a dl' width until the tntdule ol the stracture where tt exp'ands to 32'. Accessory structures in b.tih proposals have been placed within a blutt impact zone (30’ setback area from top of blufO. Hardship Statement Please refer to Exhibit A. Issues for Consideration 1 Will Planning Commission Members consider a variance tor new construction? If not. proceed no further with this section of the memo and advise applicant to presem a instruction plan that meets setbacks deHned in the legal building envelope. If members feel that the hardships are valid and would consider granting a variance, what proposal for development appears most feasible for the property? If a st^et setback variance is granted, would vou also approve a setback variance to the bluff impact zo^'^ A deck can be relocated in the west side yard and meet required setback. Proposal B to major ttroblems as the bluff is encroached by major portions of principal structure. If a street Ltback variance is not feasible, what degree of encroachment ot the blutt impact zone would members recommend? Do members have any problem with the access stair and deck being installed in the bluff impact zone.^ Options of Action Deny any request for variances and direct applicant to develop building plans that conform to defined legal building envelope; or Recommend approval of street setback variance but discourage any further encroachment ot the Lff impact zone. Applicant to provide amended plans before application is scheduled before Council; or To deny request for a street setback variance and to approve encroachment zone for specific portions of principal structure ... to allow access stair and ec ' wi i bluff impact zone ... to discourage all encroachment of the blutt area. ■'r CITY OF ORONO - VARL^NCE .-VPFLICA riONInitial Applicatioa res 52GO.OO(S50.00 per each additional variance; Renewal Variance Fee S 100.00 (no chance from origirnl applicauon) Variance for noa-confomiing stmcrarea .^fter-nhe-Fac: Fees (Doucie appucatioa *ee) PROPERTY INT0R>L4TI0.N ^ /f ^1 .1 V ^ W-4 • ' W”** '- ' 'wAw' 4 ■• ••• ^ ^ ^ .. t-ri. k «• . ' V * K ■' "* • V ' “ • h^J** -*• V. ■ «. V M l» •>«> '< w . w vT ‘ .-■ '»■ « V NJgr>iu^^ ^,;vg;r .Attach legal description to appiicat.cn ii ^ * - (month'year) Date Profisir/ Acquured_____ , (do)(^ also ^ “'o^.-spec-.^-)_______________________ Present use or property'. ----- ---------------_______ Zoninc Diitr:ct:_____jUA. ~ -------------------- ~~ .applic.ant ^ ^ j. _ ^ Address: ----- PhcK (hcme)_ ^3 ?^ Phorc (work)_SS2lzSIH~ ON^'NTR (if different than applicant) &/'>sr/^4s4T--------_rr r . I A__I__'-ry-o*.! • 4 -d •• j3 < C -(jjjderhtf/'ST tJ^nna'kome) H“^Z' tSjl Phone (%ycrk) clc^ rvygu'^^ . -.r- T-»r*rAiTTtT FstimatedLons>-.dcticuCoscDESCRIPIIONOF REQLT^I^ Describe request indeaii. ^ jT - ---------n^ch additional she^ aecessar/) VARI-^N'CES REQLTRED ^ Lot .Area ___^ Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:•'Z, rrcct Side Average Inkesncre Other (specify) n.^SHIP,'DESCRIPTION OF ccmpii^c^ .pmng lolorr . b^rr ttfVNpo^CT fg—------------r is Z2-V ------------------------------------------^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) :w.dffi£. -9:i f r s *.Mf V/ r*^ \mkrn iiOl ^i. . T.iiiftf f! de-adlinedatejn order A11^fth>fnllnwingmfonMtioiLm»a^t_— . _ anDiiaiip juobe^aga^^-gmg^^ 1 Conculeted Application withia I'^O’ (>'ou must obtain tiiis list rrotn 2. ~~ C‘.ztinci Propertv- 0^w:s oi o^rs ^ t 34S-:-271). ----Heanepin County Depsxtnto=t o. Fxa*.c- A - 3. Flat Map (obtatcad vnta ‘ ‘ a rurvevor) and include hardcover d. ___Certificate of Survey (s.re^ ‘ ' (jj ^gpy SW x IP for calculations as requued. In aaa >.cn, ^ rsprcductlOQ. e'evacioos) If my changes ia existing grade - ToDCsrachic survey (existing aca p ^ ^ j- reorcduction. - - are proposed. In Provide oce (1) copy 3'V x If ). Sketches or plans or aoor . _„tai staras) of ail persons with an interest in the List of the legal names (inc.u ’nniicant(s) if not current owcert.s). properr/. This would inciuae Min ^ ^ separate list of any other persons c AS m addendum to this acpucation. pieas. am.c. .. vou wish notified of this application^ 9. Xdditional items as may be requested by C.n. --rt. e -irrr, rhis dpn::c2tioa. Please remember that y^ ".S Admimstraror. agrees tO anplication. and certuies that the and/or consultant knowledge, information suppled 6. mai Date IO-10-‘>i Applicmt ’^ OWTiER’S SIGNATL^ / , annirmoa and further authorizes reasonable this change prior to the meeting. . . TY pr c ^ a iS>^ *~T i sRUN DATE M/ii/H8ATCN 007OROO AOOR OMCR NAME TAXOAYER NAME/AOOR 50 07-li7-25 31 001501270 NILOHURST TR J I R STASIK JAMES STASIK 1270 HILOMURST TRAIU MOUND m SSSA4 ^lOCFXM COUNTY FROFtRTT INrORMATiOM STSTfM FROFCRTV OHNCFS LIST30 07-117-23 31 002*00030 AOORESS UNASSIGNEB ROBERT I OIRKUAIO ETAL ROBERT L BIRKELAND 12*0 NILOHURST TRAIL MCRJND 553**nOQRT NO. 01*35*01RACE 1*30 07-117-23 31 0027012R8 NILOHURST TRMARIT BIRKELANDROBERT L t HARir OXRKXUDR)12*0 HILOMURST TRHtAJND m 553**O.1RROR AOOR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOORPROP AOOR 0»0CR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOORPROP AOOR 0»0CR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OlOCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 30 07-117-23 51 002800058 AOORESS UNASS19C0 ROBERT L BIRKELAND A HIFE ROBERT L BIRKELAND 12*e HILOMURST TRAIL MOUNO MN 553**50 07-117-25 51 0055 00058 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO ERNEST J A MARY J LErtlERMAH ERNEST J A MARY J LEHMERHAN 12*7 HILOMURST TRAIL MOUND It* 553**58 07-117-25 52 0025 0**25 TOTKAVIEH LA R M SHELTON AML SHELTON R H SHELTON AML SHELTON *«2S TONKAVIEH LA MOUNO MN 553** 58 07-117-25 32 00** 0*«50 TOIAUVIEH LA J 0 OOLEZAL A J A ROSTAO J 0 OOLEZAL A J A ROSTAO **50 TONKA VIEH LA HOUND m 553** 58 87-117-23 31 0031812** HILOMURST TR P M SCHIt««L AMS COMINSKY PAtTl MAC SCHlfP^L 12** NILOHURST TR hound HN 553**58 07-.17-25 51 0038 012*1 HILOMURST TR S H HE»€SSY A K L HEttCSSY S M A K L HENNESSV 12*1 NILOHURST TR MOUNO MN 553**38 07-117-23 32 00270**35 TONKAVIEM LA C J FENNER A K S FENNER CHARLES J FENNER 2215 LINCOLN ST N E MPLS m 55*10 TOTAL OATCM 007 00015 58 07-117-25 51 0052012*7 NILOHURST TR E J LEMMERMAN ETAL ERNEST J LEFtRRMAN 12^7 HILOMURST TR MOUNO FM S55**58 07-117-tS U e«H 00058 AOORESS UNASSIGNEO KATHLEEN C ASM KATHLEEN Q ASH *58* SHORELINE OR 8101 SPRING PAm Ml 5538*58 07-117-23 32 00*30***0 TONKAVIEH LA KENFCTH J HICKEY KENNETH J HICKEY ***0 lUNKAVIEM LA MOUNO NN 553** (‘V';-»n i.c« « 1sr*;' 'k’J' I > ■ ■< ‘J i iUM MTI M/li/niATCN M7 COUMTt MOWmr ItgOWUTIOM STSTttI PtOPttTr OMCRS UST RftMT m.»act 17.»^>v <u\ ■ •Ks >, V’; V IU'-1 •05 DATI m v>• *i ■• •. ••' iV -«.nV : 1• < ' 4 ■I ■' ''l3.n . %. * «• •1 i ■>1 ♦ ^ Li ’Tt' I (wc) Acki!Owl«S*Cirieat* Fo’ririAdjacent Property 0-r.^rs Ac*^ K£0^ H.c^y ----------- [pant address] •^1 ;}h Sprint naxne(s)]^ ^ k •>* - -V - ^ - “■^r T.s?';rs°^ *■•*'***■ ■—••«■" ___^^’.''^.4 •/%• ^^ I i<im (sir*' .-CC is."CwU v I c«) u.«:ro=d ■--... ^ ~=:.:y :o coa:^-= :or declare aocrovai cr disapproval o r ^ jjacs and diat ite propcsed -eigbbor s Cooocil tilt I (-el am (are) aware ot die dn,rav._ , project or use requires Coursd approval. Prccertv Ov-ner —?—Date Preperr/ Owner Date mmmm m m m I (wc) y^-rr/ m <,f?yyr»2^<^ [pnnt namets)] a.^ [print address] •,4 :rT--rnve-eat or proposed use of the preperty located d‘o're^e^-i “ 'I CeW T— » * 1 ---- I (we) understartd rhar in e.eecutmg tl S'ci^ Si “aT. t eralTaV-:;-- or-dnprV.eme-.r pians and rdat die proposed neiprsoor -rojec: or use requhes Councu approval. Date •a.'SLsesssess Siz^^ssr. s» to the scheduled meeang date. 1 I i r < rt, f' * b N\ S^vv- CITY of ORONO A RE50MTI0N OK TllE Cm COl'NCIT NO. 3-4 4l9--------- , // A RESOl.LTION GR/VNTING vari .vnces to mlt^icipal zoning code SECTION 10.24, SUIini' ISION - iB) file #1911 WHERFXS Ernest 1. Leminerman (heteinafter 'the applicant') is ptopett>. locate ”" ToLvtew Une w.tP.n the C.ty of Orono fhetetna.tet Cty > and legally descnbcd as follows; A H,*nrenin Countv, Minnesota ihereinafier the Lot 1. Block 1. Ummerman Addition. Henr.epin v^cuniv, property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied Zoning Code Section where 43.560 s.f. or I acre is the undeveloped lot which consists ot ^U.AU s.i. oi required. Minnesota: NOW. THEREFOKE. HE IT RESOl.VED by the City Council of Otono. findings 1.Thit application uas revieived as Zoning File #1911. • . 1 •« fK#. TR IR Lak«*shore Residential Zoning DistrictThe property is located in the LR-lb. ui».-snorc requiring I 3cre in arej. j. Ue Otono Planning Commission teneived ih. b!!ed and May 16. 1994 and recommended approval oi tnc p p upon the following findings; A..A residence had existed on the property. Page 1 of 5 cmr of ORONO »i # re ^olltion of the cm coi ncil NO. 8 4 4 9 ^_ B The properr>' has been assessed for sewer and a sexver stub is available at Tonkavicw *Unc for new residential constmction I nr 1 of the Lemincnnan Addition was created as a result of a lot line [^^^Ingem^nh't divided Lots I and 2 along a natural division line created by steep topographies. TV • nil rarce' was of an unusual shape and l^cause of the couV;” y .he nor.hem or sou.her. pans of the property. Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan ot the City. 5. welfare of ihc ccmmuruiy. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CO-NDITIONS Based upon one or more of ’5^^^ the cT^ru^ti^n^ra^'w^^^^^^ on^r^fope^ griming an Irea variance of 22,660 s.f. or 52., subject to the following conditions: Pace 2 of 5 .N //o CITY of ORONO Kt:iOLtTION OF Tin: city COLNCIL NO _ 3 4 4 g—— 1. w II «iihie''t to itc ^stbcick standirds 'Jut detii.cs sss" " ri:r. J c; rxr.=':;rrr;:srr,,.-«*« rruiu uic con..™c.,on o. o.h« ."P-™ ''™'f-calh'’Vr«cnoL S'oomrol land alterauons, tree removal and cros.on Tmiol w^in'sinep sloped or bluff areas of properrs'. 3. cUlUiVJl r Authorities granted by thts variance a'building orthe ”datc m round approval, or thts vanance w.l, onthat date .July 11. 1995). Violation of or non-compliance vvidt any^cf ___. ^ lermuiJic au> -- tsr:sr,;“—?'?.. - -«- *• property Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 11th day o. July. 1994. ATTEST: rodiy M/TTflin. City Clerl: Edward J _______ / Piopcrty OviJ^erts) Page 3 01 5 ttOf >« » rmiffciii^ii r r »N CITY of ORONO Ri:SOLtTlO.N OF THE CITV' COl NCII -3-44-9------ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) • , M acknowledeed before me on ihis Ilih day of July. The toregoing instrument ^ clerk of the City of Zo!’a so!a corp-a.-. aL’ u.d u..mme„. w. c.ccu.cd on of .he Citv. i-m ^jja^ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) Notary Public )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) . 199 ^ . before me a Notary Public Q Notar.' P’Jblic STATE OF .NflNNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this dav of . 199 . before me a Notary Public withinand for J„d who e.xecucod the !^S:^:d';a: .an.e as dis ffherr) free ac. and deed. Notary Public Pace 4 of 5 1 i i resolution ^9 4 4 9 of HIHtiESOTA counrr of hesn £?in ) ) ) ) CITI Of OSOMO . Dorotny M. Halim, City rnur*'f '•Minnesota, do - -*«r*He city Council of -f'eCi-. ^r^re^oln. copy of a ;Vu‘c.' V. “ciu"coVn’c a ;“^.;31nra-^f -Py Couocr- .0 a^;-- Council at said aeet^ns.ilatsalcaeB''*-"®* ,.has , Uhe-.or I P.av. hereunpo „C ny hand and >,a* *h. fay --------------------• ----- (SEAL) f • • r »*j,fei$i-iititfr/^iiirti ■■iinii'P*^^ - - I y-1 MINLTES OF THEPLTJLIC COMMENTS REGIXAR orono city covncil meetingHELD JULY 11. 1994 There 'A-cre "O public ccturue.-^- ZONING .-VDMLVISTR-A.TORS RITORT irMAfFR\L\N r97 WTLDHURST TRAIL - SUBDIVISION (53) a. ^1903 ERNEST ^^^^^^.^GE^^ENT - RESOLUTION NO. 3448 ^ OF A LOT LLNE 1297 WTLDHl'RST TR.VlL- 4620 b. M911 ERNEST so. 3449 TONKAVTEW LANX - ^ Mr and Mrs. Ernest Lem.T.ennaii '^ere present. -moved dus item from the Consent Agenda was Mayor Callahan eaplaiaed '’T ^^d felt this should he commented on pnor to because he received a lener trom me .e.v..oor acproving the resolutions. • • fhe neishbor to wriie this letter prior to the Mabusth commented diat shej^aa o^.ghbor had several concerns relating to the Commission meeting in May uccau-^ “u‘’x here- m do a lot line rearrangement with . Ir. focTme rearrangement. Mr. fUmg of the first sKetch plan review Mabusth noted the ne* divmon tuns a^ong *e felt they could not deny d:;.r or^:: s i£^e.usf proceed with his plans pr.or to - receded, knowing there would most uKCly » - ^ area, and they could then constcet be a need tor »>-. approval of a building envelope. Mabusth reviewed the conceptual approval T-t issue The southern elevations are more c j.;ellev added that sewer EEi:-- “ - - ‘sewered lots to be buildable. Kurr noted this was^a^^x i^rAas^e^olf^^^ lliorc the Cic>' Attorney combined with an a^iac^^ s°cw«ed thev should be dealt with separately. advised that wnen lots are scAereu. lu . %+> .<iClUtLlfal>.tl M..-TES O. THE U.. COT.OE ^.EET^^C(«) #1903 & #1911 ERN-EST LEMMERMAN tCONTLVUED) f fh'jr Citv when dealing with Ici area vanancwo, Mabusth confirmed the ,,rimces. Mayor CaUahan noted that the could no. on nonce of the restricted bu.lding envelope, resolutions would "" . . r.___1...;^^ Vrt •;uj.s nn ^r-r.T’ir W'XITTFR RAINEY RO.-VD-VA^RL\NCES (,4) #1937 ERIKA AND HEMERT F. K-XHLER. - ^ - resolution no . 34-0 Mr and aMrs. Kahler were present tennis coun. _ ' • ,•ar^ thf» r«»'-i«ed 2radin2 plan and contirmen Mabusub explained that the Ciry ^"«'"'''4“t”r.rawav from the toe of the mound. Stephen tliai drainage will be airected to the .. required if the drainage were directed awa^ Wedonan agreed that a lO’ acceptable. These revised grading/draina2|* ]Z commission to review, therefore they recommen.... die 10 ’ setback with a smaller tennis coun. Tmotion was made by Hurr. seconded cop'tc '■ '■ .-n FL17ABETH MELA.MED. 1000 OLD CRVSTAE BAY S So “mS. SE^DHTSION - RESOLLtnON Mr. Melamed was present. Mavor Callahan stated the only issue • i remaining to be discussed was the park dedication fee. CITY of ORONO Ntoycrp*! CXSr«*Ntoycrp*! CXSr«* Pott Box t6 Crr«»i E*?. iSJii-iSSSi ***. ^ ^ <P Hardcover Zones - .flowed . .rc^ =- 0-7: -5-250’ 250-500’ 5GC-’.0CO ’ Hardcover includes: -•0 5i 35 “c . P.cofs - SiCC’-vajcs zravei ar.veways . *?2UCS ic dec.-'-s (Lnciuoes^siar.ed dec.cs) . Toos 01 rsuuaing wails .x ^psc-c shectu^^ or fabne - Decoracive aosorpnea of rainfall ante . ,\tiy cmer £Uiia>.« >nac - :hs around:hs arounc ,,„,CT,OSS H^co™ -VO.Ki.IHET - -<• ■ *_"s raicuiation :s .or.u.-w -one .0-'5 . •-----—1 Cu-c:= wrjwn Sw..—- —■ , . . .«.^e-e-a-i and widdi. and multiply .0 • •, ^ ^^f ‘-a'-'cover wiuun mat zone. e..u. .e*-r-iFor eaca iceni or iouar^ roccasc (s..-)« . led uo all « Iduaaa :oocag« :o |« :ctal squaaa fcccag. of daad=o«r. - -oo= and xultiply by ICO to i« Divide by Ae total area at orofe../ - -d oercer-mgc of daioocver in me ^cn . ma. ----- ^ ^ . •'aficr If ebaogea allowed. conaetCity atari ra”o“"r;ceedxg ^iA your project plaanxg! TEXKPHCNE - 4T]0af7 • EAjr - 473-0510 1 1i ^--------------A. pROPOSyn FiARnc^Q^'E^ ZO^S A. HouiC Zll HI___ Leaf'll X 3. Oarage C. Dn.vc'vay 78 X X 78 SI ss D. Sice'*-aJc,X X E. ?atio/"D^iC X X F. Landicape Uaderlaia By Plastic 3<?o X X X G. Otter ni^S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. J^IZ. S.F. S.r. 7 ‘/t S.F. S.F. 75^7 /8q S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. total HAJIDCOVER IN ZONE" total PRQP^TY ARE.. IN-ZON-E^ ^ ^ -TP 1^00 S.F. S.F. f* /t' A B A B r 1 / « AP S o^ jr I# S*<f' 0 w V J5--*77/p L^ tJ - I! AI I ! t b’-i • « «• « • I : I1 ■ f I ' if i\>I*It I >!lr.1*. IIi• I .• * ’ I• . I i i . I t I i■t. :•y7 1 I II . . t If i • “t » i i ' . \ i I .1 t. 1 I-: .■»r, • I I! I atS ^jrrr-5 -rI tI •- -1 ■ • -I I t 1 IilIk'i.,Tjj[Li I ! I i tI ,iUI 1*1*’*^ ^ t i: f" i-..f i. 4-i lii'-----i -4.. ITlV f=t>-**i 1 1 I ! I I I I .. I I ♦ i ••. I *. < I r X I 'JL t ^ 1»~ I ! « i ‘ u 0 • : L 1' ' I 1 I I I rv’ I F,ii ’ ■t'' Fi 1 1 ! 1 « p.o H i • i : I I :7^ •*•* if" ' I * ....i... ;r ! ! i I I • 5 • .« mm, ♦ -i I. tl' I y .1 ) i i 1 il. *• M !:ii:li'lli IiI ■ • .1«t«.1. :‘ii I I i ,*•i,•tl;. I !! 1 lit :■ li: I t, > * ::•! i:’-‘ i; liii .: t V h\\ I 11 ‘ 5 ■i'i :ii:| 1 ';! ;ii ;n till t 1 ■ i li 11.; ■ I •«'III ' I ii; .1 iU i iili iH' . If >.4 .« ^ * t I r r : [:■! 'r- ~ - —- _____1 j 1 J It — A — -i m I** ----1 V .-- -H i:- tJ fj I i f I I 1 • ! i » t ! I. *I •i 1 • t I • I i i. 'i . \ \ li; . I »i i ’ I .! 1 = H ir ; I t ’ X. I •*. f Ti »• !1 -.M'' :s 5 • • ## Ji it t > I. ■Am ii jfcr" ^—k£siainCZz: rtm . >r ■fh U. v«-y«.v^-eo akM'jp " ■' -', <=T6pi 1 ■ f-'* v\0^ ..-^ ^ ti » D *;// --.-f -S V fev> i~l ■^mW y: ♦ •• •• 1i EE1 ^\m A ■ i r t N r > e£D HOOW .r~N nmm* b<L-i- »* 1 f < M«*««• • •«« '• •^MIM MOOM *»;■ - -'"1 BFO nOOM i-- fS^noom .1 •■ > 1 0^----------4-~ ®fCOWOFtCX)«---------M ... ^ t«oftA«i •«• •*• SUN Of CIC • w« •• •«•*•••*••• > ••> • •«•• •••*• / ' Tr::zr'z: —•;cnrrr—.—rrrr-..—.iN N NOOM KITCHEN DINING ROOM t«v»« OARAGE ..•• • •• ••• ■••• EAUiaY ROOM ; — - ....»^i*“-. a. . ^ *“•••• I .a.. -m It f^mJL a—I living room BfO room »»«•• ■t hrv ~— r first Floor T i /N.///\ \ XT\ \V» •' -V, V. X \V\^t- L. ni 4 \ \ / i ! i h iS • % • * • _..mssKM s-I 8X TO; FROM: DATE: Chair Schrocilcr and OrofK> Planning Ctmnnission Memhers Ron Mcxjrsc. City Admini>trator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator November 17, 1994 St3JECT; #1982 Daniel S. Perkins. 55 Landmark Dri\e - Variance Condit ional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA requiring 5 acres of dry buildable land (2 acres must be contiguous). Property consists of a total of 10.4 au:res. /.2 dry and 3.2 tstl. Pntinent Ordinances Section 10.03. Subd. 19 - Conditional use permit required as land alterations involved more than the movement of 100 cubic yards of material. .Applicant proposes the excavation ol 2.000 cubic yards of peat over a ten year perk^ of time. Section 10.55. Subd. 8 - Variance required as dredging is proposed within a designated wetland where such alterations are prohibited by code. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicam's Addendumi C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Ceil Strauss Letter. DNR. 9/2/93 F - MCWD Utter 10/14/94 G - J. Yanta. Dept, of Army, 10/14/94 H - Cross Section of Pomis I - Construction Plan J - Site Plan K - Resolution #2455, Plat of Bayside Unding L - Resolution #2688, Approving the Conditional Use Permit/Variance for Loren Butterfteld to Excavate Peat Within Another Area of the Same Designated Wetland .M - Plat of Babysbreaih. Butterfield's Property N - Council Minutes Approving CUP 8/20/89 O - Gustafson Report 11/15/94 P - Map Indicating Butterfield’s Access to Property r ■ i Zoning Ftlc #1982 November 17. 1994 Pace 2 IVMrripikiti of Request Arplicani proposes the dredging of approximately 2.000 cubic yards of peat over a ten year period of time Excavaitons will create two |X>nds within the designated wetlands of the subject property. Refer to Exhibit J. the smaller pond is 5.000 s.f. in area and the larger one approximately 25.000 s.f Open water areas will be created in 68 .icres of the 3.2 acre wetland. The subject wetland has been completely taken over by reed canary grass There is no sign ot open watei area within the wetland. The specific wetland covers approximately 150 acres. Staff will present overhead views of the wetland and existing excavations in wetUral areas located within Loren Bunertield’s property to the ntmhwest of the subject propeny. Refer to E.xhibits H and I. it is the intention of the applicant to have U>ren Butterfield who operates a nurscrv and landscape business located on Watenown Road to excavate approximately 200 cubic yards of peat each year during the winter months when the wetlands is frozen. The smaller pond will be completed in two years, the larger pond in eight years. Refer to Exhibit P. access to the property will he as shown on the map. Buttertield s property is contiguous with the subject propeny at the northwest comer. In 1989 Loren Butterfield received approval of a conditional use pemiit/variance application to allow the removal of 300 cubic yards of peal each year. Butterfield had been mining peat tor approximately thirty years as part of his nursery operation. It was during the subdivision ot his property that the City was advised of the use and asked the applicant to complete the conditional use permit as part of the sub«livision review. Review Exhibit M. Buttert eld s mining for peat was located in the weth.al area within Outlot A BvMh Bunertield's ongoing operation and applicant's proposed excavations involve the same 150 acre wetland. At your site inspection members will fiiK'. it difficult to locate the exact area of the proposed larger pond. It will be located within me wetlands to the southwest of the existing residence. Exhibit K. the resolution that granted approval of the Bay side I.anding plat conditioned approval on develo ler granting a conservation flow age easement over the designated wetlands. Review Exhibits E, F and G. the DNR advises that the wetland is not one of the DNR protected wetlands and therefore pemiiiting is not required. They do ask that standards for wildlite ponds be adhered to once the excavations take place. Excavations within this wetland will not require a permit from the .MCWD based on the guidelines of the new National Wetlands Act. Mr. Yantis of the Dept, of the Army advises that the proposed improvement project would fall under a nation-wide permit. The Dept of the Army standards for the issuance of a nation-wide permit are also included with Mr. Yantis* letter. Review Exhibit O. Gustafson ’s report lists questions that need to be answered to complete the review. Three of the four have already been answered by the applicant. Buttertield will r Zoning Fite i^l9S2 November 17. 1994 Page 3 approach the propeny ai the m'tihucst comer »1ierc ilic property lines meet, refer to Exhibit M. The mining or excavations will take place m Ok winter months The peat material will K* immediately conveyed to liutienteUl ’s nursery to the north far frt>m the wetland areas The only question that remains is the metlkxl or type of equipment pri>poscd to ci'inplcte the excavations and transport off site. Suff has been advised that Butterfield will employ the same methtxl approved in the 1989 review for Mr. Butterfield's application Ihe excavation is circular type hole at a 6' maximum depth and 50' diameter resulting in the removal of approximately 200 cubic yards of peat. Such 50' wkk excavations shall be made each winter season for a penod of ten years until the project is completed. Statf notes that most of the findings made for Ok original conditional use permit approved for Butterfield in 1989 are still applicable for this reviewr. The excavation of open water areas totalling .68 acres in the 150 acre wetland will have little impact on the wetland. In fact it would create more positive benefiis. The engineer in 1989 nvUed the following: w ildlife habitat would be enhanced, open water areas wimld provide sediment trap, varied design of slopes to the open water areas would cra:our3ge more beneficial wetland/aquatic vegetation. The existing over grown wetland provides little retentu>n tor runotf. It is questionable how much treatment takes place. Issues for Consideration 1.luich vear an excavation will be made removing 200 cubic yards of material. It has not been made clear to the City staff what other types of land alterations shall follow the excavations to insure that appropriate slopes and erosion control are maintained. When will the final 'touch up* excavations be made-at the time each 200 cubic yard excavation is completed or in two or eight year periods.’ <*» *What kinds of equipment will be used to carry or convey the peat material from the site.’ List the name of the method or type of equipment used to make the excavation lor the removal. 4.How do we assure that the DNR standards for wildlife ponds arc maintained during this interim ten year perivxl.’ 5.What of the safety issue--with the creation of 6’ deep, 50’ wide excavations out in the middle of 150 acre wetland? Is temporary' signage necessary to warn any trespassers.’ 6.Why are we asked to approve a project that will be extended tor a ten year process.’ This worked for Butterfield’s needs. This project could easily be completed in one season What are the benefits of extending the project? Zoning Fik #1982 November 17, 1994 Page 4 Review the original resolution that granted approval of Butterfield’s conditional use permit, Fxhibit L. Conditions were as follows: 1. 2. Annual excavation of peat from the wetland kvated to the nmih of the Luce Line shall be limited to 200 cubic yards (Butterfield’s application was limned to 300 cubic yards). Applicant (no»e not Butterfield who functions as the applicant’s contractor, applicant assumes responsibility) must obtain an annual land alteration permit from the City of Orono specifying amount of peat to be removed, a plan for the work to be completed that year along with an erosion control plan. Other conditions reammended tor this application. All land alteration activities to be limited to the winter months. The City has approved access to site for these land alterations to be at the northwest comer of the property. If contractor alters access and seeks access via Landmark Drive, the City must be advised so that applicant can prov ide suitable notice to land owners served by Landmark Drive. Each year applicam shall provide a plan show ing how slopes are to be maintained to encourage wildlife habitats jaljaccnt to open water areas and submit a plan introducing aquatic vegetation adjacent to the open water areas. 5. Others recomme nded by the Planning Commission. 1 :v f ! CITY Oi' CKCNO — GrI^i£HAL LAJ«D USS APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Sit« Address 5~5' xrc?er-y Ider.tificatior. Nvrrber (P.I.D.) Please attach lecal description to app cn recuired survey. / T 4-^15- /O licatioi«r€ ncf?f'lnc^^^d r^gr APPLICANT Nar.e Fhcne (hcrse) 7 ^ ~ V ^ ^ Phene Cwcrk) H73 ^ Address 5-^ /VjD A/^ P»^City C/^OKTt* _ eWNEH (ii diiderent than applicanw) Nas5e Address Phene (hene) Phene . Citv m ,• Date Prgaegty .Acquired {Sion th/year ) (do.also ow-n the adjacent^parcels of land. fees - CONDITIONAL USB PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with C”? applicaticn $125.00 Residential accessory v^se S17S.00 Institutional (church, schcoli. etc.) $150.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Ccrxiercial/lndustrial Use W a • w w iTuitU . ** %•» * • kA w'( t awu a w w % V i _ eC#V i JC'v L'w'v vv V ■-fi* e VI VW*« A.*.k»e% --r kk>k^ < k.ww • \• r* vT_ vr/f irAi v4f Tf 1 A . • A S» $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cn. yd. or more i-keshere Grading, seawall, retai.nrng waxls within 75 of lakes PRD/PID “ see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 $250.00 $175.00 $ 75.00 $300.00 $300.00 $100.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) Vacation Easement Vacation _ Easement Vacation With Subdivision Rezening (PUD — refer to *-*® schedule) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appeals Other - see fee schedule PE2SZNT US£ CF PKCPZKTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify)_ DESCRIPTION O? REQUEST ^ ^ rs ^ Describe recuest in detail: ^cAs/^Tlc^ OF Pg3»T~ **■ « i _ -— Aft.. . . L jm i Im. TD ^ Agi^Tfc t^o<^ q&v M- pVaT"”/*^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS :• ce-vH'iVd l-is* oJ owners vithin 350' (ycu can obtai thlTifst Jrcn Hennepin County Departaent of Finance A-603 Governner. Center 348-3271). 3. Plat Map. j ^ 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor). 5. 6. 7. any you ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OP LARGE DOCUMENTS OR A WORKING COPY (11* X 17* OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUB^TOT._____ -^e'aVolicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please i^ember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. __________________________ Certlficltllt"by”clerlcal Department that La.nd Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date_ _ ___ ___ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all (staff requested by t.he Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional . time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the informat-on supplied is true and correct to the best his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature JlL it of =9-Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to^t.his ^^gy^tants, authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, _f- of agents, commission members, and_ Council members for purposes of investigation and verificati^ of this request. ________ Date ___—Owner's signature AopIIcant must have all submittals into t.he City offices 25 Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building * zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. MANAGEMENT, wc t October21. 1994 -f r City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Ofono. MN 55356 Dear City Planning Commission: Simply like to aflow him to do the same on my property over the next ten yearsmmimmmare a haven for vnklMe. waterfowl in particular. This is the objective for my own land. Currently, the land is a peat bog with very little open water. Open ponds would enhance the land both for wildlife and aesthetically. Enclosed is my corrtpleted application form, a copy of my certified survey (which sh^ the location of the proposed ponds), a certified 350 foot property owner s list ^d a topographic survey plus construction plan, both of which I completed for the ' have not included grading and drainage plans since there will be no grading involved a the drainage will remain the same. Also, hardcover calculations do not seem to apply to this project. It is my feeling that this is a relatively simple Homeowner land improvement project that I am proposing. I hope that it can be approved by the city with minimal effort. Sincerely, Daniel S. Perkins enclosure DSP:bvh 730 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA. MN 55391-1769 telephone (612) 473-6367 TELECOPIER (612) 473-4702 lsaT«m.lENT MA.NACEME.vr -r I ( ^ • I L yfv’^ vi ^f>t. (*•01 ^ •S <W’y i ( f5 1 ijfl m ('?) r~^wx'R® a:l' i \<*. fiO- TT 4 » ( I 4i rrj • W W7 V* ’1 * t X 1 U1 «f ^-|f'W $ 7 iCji' . iiSTHr -. JL^ i • •iO“l l«> LT-^ n tr II - • 1 ’*V> S f •# !••II •I r ••(M8)'1.i • Jl_ f >*1 —4;^ f ( m5) ••f^a. . V m N » • • ! .MM MTf l9/Z9/n MTCN SOS HeNMirprii asoNT? w»wnmr iwtjwwtiob ststehnMMItTT CMCtS LISTTAKOAYfKIMfC/AOORAOOtTAXPAYERIMf«/AOORniOR AOOR SM«R NAME TAXRAYER MAME/AOOR MKSP AOOR (MCR HAHE TAXPAYER MAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OMCR HAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR Si 0S-117-ZS XI OQQS 0S700 OAYStOE RO RAXEL ANDERSON HAZEL ANDERSON S7R0 RAYSZOE RC LONO LAKE m SSSS4Si es<ii7-2S fi oeif 00050 LANDNARK OR JANES • PATRICIA TOOO JANES A PATRICIA TODD UY NEADON LA LONB LAKE NN 5535ASi 0S>117-2S XX OOTl OOOSi ADORES* UNASSICNEO STATE OP H»M STATE OP NXNN lONRI (LUCE LINE TRAIL I SO 0S-U7>XS XX 0010 00055 LANDNARK OR D S PERRINS A P N PERKlNI DANIEL S A PATRICE N PERKIFS S5 LANDNARK OR ORONO MN 55S5A Si 0S-117-XS XX 0014 00105 LANDNARK DR R P A K A RYLE RICRARO P A RATMLEIN A KYLE 1140 TONRANA RO LONi LAKE NN 55154 SO 0S-117-XS XI »0f 00038 AOORtSS UNASSIONIO STATE OP Kl»««STATE OP HINN tONR«I LUCS LINE TRAILLSO 05-117-Xl <1 00X0 03750 SAVSIOE RO JOHN A NARY JANE DUROER CHRISTINE A CARY VALERIUS 3750 DAYSIOE RO LONB LAKE m 55354SO 0S-117-XS XX 0004 00030 AOOKESS UNA^OCO HICHAEL 6 PILORAPRLT raCRAEL riLORMIT S440 OAVSIOC RO MAPLE PLAIN NN 55S5Y 30 05-117-XS XX 0011 00175 LANDNARK OR L C KARREN A J N KARRPti LEE C A JULIE H HARREM 175 LANDMARK OR LONB LAKE LOL 55354 30 05-117-XS X5 0034 00030 ADDRESS UNASSI6NE0 LANDMARK OR HOHEOLOICRS ASSOC LANDMARK OR HOMEOPOIERS ASSOC C/0 LEE C NARREN 175 LANDMARK DR LONB LAKE MN 55354 PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 50 05-117-X3 X4 0100 00051 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER S770 BAVSIDE RO LONB LAKE W 55S54 38 05-11'-Xl X4 0101 03770 ‘>^YS10E RO SAC GARDINER STEVE GARDINER 3770 SAVSIOE RO LONG LAKE NN 55354 HO. PiAifAOl Pi^ 11Si 05-117-XS XI 0014 03700 SAVSIOf to J • HtUS A J E MRUS JANES 0 A JOAN I NALS S7W) OATSIOC IM LONB LAKE L0< 55154SO 05-117-XS XI MXl 00050 LANONARR OR JANES A PATRICIA TOGO JAMES A PATRICIA TOM 144 NEAOOM LA LONG LAKE HN 553545S QS-117-XS XX 0007 03440 OAVSIOE RO MICHAEL 6 PILORANOT HICHAEL PILMANOT SHO OAYSIK RO MAPLE PLAIN LOP 55354 30 0S-U7-XS XX 0013 00040 AOORtSS ULMSSIONEO O S PERKINS A P H PERKILBi DANIEL S A PATRICE N PERRINS 55 LANOHARK OR ORONO L0< 55S54 so 05-117-XS X5 Q0S7 00X55 LANOHARK OR NARK L A KARENA S CASEY LLARK L A KARENA S CASEY 4SX0 ENCHANTED OR PnULLO NN S5S44 - T SO 05-117-XS X4 OIOS 00038 MLORESS UNASSIGNID SAC GARDINER STEVE 6AR0INER S770 SAVSIOE m LONG LAKE m 55SS4 L/u \ * 3 t V' ‘if- MM DATE 1Q<^•ATCH tOSPROP AOOR OMCR NANS TAXPAYER NANS/AOORPROP AOOR OMCR NANI TAXPAYER NAMS/AOORPRO* AOOR OMCR NAM TALPTAYER NAM/AOOR ___ 0 D ' .:! t. ;} u . x»* * ••« ■:'9/ •' f • ^ » ,*l * • ■ ^:::p i ■ ) »' .'(^ .• .'1% . ■.* - ‘ « GO jr MINNI&nAnMWATERSHED DISTRICT 15500 Way2ita Bmiltvafd 611 T¥»«tv« Oalis Centaf Wayzata, Minnasota 55391 0Sic«: iS12J 47»-T*T0 t«i; i*t25 47*>7»T3 kwdofu ^iasim ^ >« * -X 11 'xX October 14, 1994 ^O y Mi. Dan Ptridns 55 Landmark Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 Re- Mining of f*ai from i wetUnd on yoor property in Orono. Minneioa Wenck File No. 0185-01*151 Dear Mr. Perkins: ^ iLf rrttk Watershed District understands that you wish to aUow Lorw referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 479-4224. Sincerely, WENCK ASSOCIATl ;’ L ^ Andrew E. Syverson, P.E. Environmental Engineer AES:jmm cc! Lyle Oman, City ot Orono N:\0183N01-t54\ASlOll3-i.lir _> f/7>' II DEPARTMENT OF THE ARM>— o $T PMKS>s-^' :cw»-tc*»wrww*i<«*- we.-A - .1 MMf COP* -• €Wi«et«« cixTw* g ST tS3i w October 14, 1994 I ^ aw \ \ 1 S W.w-v.,r*^ ^Q r * -T<«, R«7ul*tory (•3-02043-K*#-JJT|w \•t.- Lor«n V. Butt«rfi«ld Cr«*nhou«** Hr- Lor«n V. Butt«rfi*I<3 3925 W*t«rtowT» *o*d M*pl« Plain, Minneiota 55359 r ^ 7 V • • • Dear Kr. “tllnd. Ih. proJ.« .U. U l« th. »w I/* 4« 1/* *•■=• «• “•■••• *' ' H«nn«pin County, Minnesota. Thi» %»ork is sligible for authorlration by a Departaent of th« nationwiLlIrmit reflr.ncd below and described in the enclosure., provided the enclosed conditions are fcllowed, including the disposal of unwanted dredged materials on an upland sits. Thl. d.t.r3ln.ttc>n cor.r. only your proLct M f'* do.ljn, loe.tion. or purpoM of the project le Ch.n,e0, you ehould content u. to «eke eure the xork would not reeult in e yloletion ot rederel le . It le your reeponelbillty to en.ure thet the work of this le’-ter and the enclosursse IT IS YOU* RESPOMSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALe, RBQOIMD STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS AND APPROVALS BEFORE YOU PROCEED WITH THE WORK. If you have any questions, contact Mr. Joa Yanta in our St. Paul office at (612) 290-5362. Sincerely, Enclosure(s) Determination: 33 CFR 330-Appendix A (26) Const ruct ior.HOp«r«t Ions Rsgulstory (93-02043-Sjl-tJJT) Inclosurs ®. Bstioswids rsnsit -..^.t-.rs sn3 w.tsrs Pt«ch4f«l. OUchsr,*. of drodgod or frll Ltsrill^n^o^hsldwstsrs s^ i.oUtsd wstsrs provldedi s. Th» dischsrgs doos the lo.. of -=r. th.n 10 .=r« of ..t.r. of th. Oolt.d St.t.., sffscted spocisl scTustic sitss. Including wstlsnds. (Also 330.!(•)); *nd C. Th« dischargs. Including All Attsndant fsaturs*. both twiporary and psnnanent, is part of a singls and cocplsts projsct. for th. purpos.. ot this natlonwid. p.r,it. the *«««* °' '°** th. United States includes the filled area plus water, of the United Spates that are adversely affected by flooding, escavation or drainage as a resolt o thi pro^cr t.h-.cr. .ni on.-.or. lUit. ot >«P 2* «. -foWt., «d c«mot bo tncro.ood by ony situation pUn offorod by tho appUcont required by th.e District Engineer. ^nhHivi.ions: For any real estate subdivision created or subdivided after O^ober 5. 1984, a notification pursuant to subsection (b) of * penrit le required for any discharge which would cause th. aggregate of -aU« ot th. unltod dtato. for th. .httr. t«Il loa. o? -at.r. of th. oottod stat.. In th. .obdWi.lon to exceed ten (10) acres is not authorired by this nationwide permit, unless the District Engineer ex«npts a particular subdivision or written determination that: (1) the individual and cumulative J**^”** environmental effects would be minimal and the property owner had, after October 5, 1984, but prior to January 21, 1992, committed substantial resources in reliance on NWP 26 with regard to a subdivision, in where it would be Inequitable to frustrate his or (2) that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental be minimal, high quality wetlands would not be adversely would be an overall benefit to the aquatic environment. Once the exemption established for a subdivision, subsequent lot property owners may proceed using KWP 26. For purposes of NWP 26, ■real estate f ibdivislon- shall be interpreted to include circumstance a landowner or developer divides a tract of land into smaller parcels for the purpose of selling, conveying, transferring, leasing, or developing said parols. This would include the entire area of a residential, commercial or other real estate subdivir on, including all parcels and parts thereof. (Section 404) Rvgioaal coaditioast 1. Pro5*ct9 uhich wculd e*n»a • loaa (*• da*crib*d In 2*.c., abova) or Btcra than thraa acraa of watara of tha U.S. ara not authorized by thia nationwida parait. 2. Tha notification r^^ilresenta outlined at C. 13. bclov apply if the projact would causa tha loss (as dascribad in 26.c. above) or atora than one-half acra of watars of tha U.S. 3. This nationwida parait is not valid foe an/ projact that woulo cauaa a significant, adverse siodification of a»ra than 10,COO square feat of *#at’andl adjacent to and within 1,000 feat of a lake or wetland that is greater than .0 acraa in size, as designated by the Hinnasota Department of Natural Resources "Public Watars/Watlands Inventory* maps. 4. This nationwide pereit is not valid for any project which is located in waters, or in wetlands adjacent to and within 1,000 feet of waters, that are defined as any of the following: a. Outstanding Resource Value Waters in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7050. b. Trout: streams as designated in Mir.nssota Oepartsent of Natural Resources Consaissioner's Order 2450 Part 6262.0400 subpart S. e. Trout lakes as designated in Minnesota Oepartsent of Natural Resources Commissioner's Order 2450 Part 6262.0400 subpart 3. 'm h list of tha above waters is attached. 5. None of the nationwide permits ars valid for regulated activities in, or in water or %wtland areas which are within 1000 feet of a boundary of, a ealcareoua fen designated by the Minn'isota Department of Natural Resourcea and listed in Minnesota Ruls 7050. A list of these calcareous fens is attached. Section 401 conditional 1. Projects which include dredging in contaminated or polluted areas or that will disturb known contaminated sediments or polluted substances as defined and as listed by HPCA are not authorized under Section 404 by any nationwide permit unless the applicant applies for, and is granted, a project-specific Section 401 certification from MPCA. 2. Projects which involve utilization of fill or bank stabilization material which is comprised of demolition debris ars not authorized by any nationwide permit unless the applicant applies for, and Is granted, a project-specific Section 401 certification from MPCA. Demolition debris is defined by Minnesota Rules Chapter 7035.0300 Subp. 30 as solid waste resulting from the demolition of buildings, roads, and other man-made structures including concrete, brick, bituminous concrete, untreated wood, masonry, glass, trees, rock, and plastic building parts. Coaditioas Prascribad Ibf Corp» Ragalatioa: Refar to tha «tt*ch»ant« for tha condition* that *r« appllcafcla to all of tha nationwide persit*. C. Nainifr^Jc Pcrrra < ncucna n^uvs: Ihc tomymng gc^m cooJmow fmi« be Mto^cd M orJcr for any aatbemataw by 3 rjjionwKlc 'crrna io be vskd. 1. Navig3tx^n No acusiiy may cauv more than a advert efTcct 00 oavipticn. Proper mamicnancc . Afly sifucture Or M authtwcii ibai be pro^vity roamtaifK*!. including mainten a nce to ensure pubirc safety. t F'rxKin and MltatKio coouf>ts. Appropfiaic m»oo and stMation comrob must be used and momlaincd in effective operating cood.t«n dunng^comtructkjo, and al «fi^d so.1 and other fiMs must be permanently suNiued at the cartiest pnaicabte date. a AJU3TIC life movements- No activtty may substantially dtsfupl tlK movement of thc»e species of aquatic Bfe indiecnous to the svnierCody, mdudmj thi*e speoes which nomully migrate through the area, unless the aaiMty*i primarv purpose ts IO impound water 5. Fguipment. He^y equipment woriung 10 wetlands mutt be placed oa mau OC caher rocasurs must be taken to minirntze soil disturbance. (tj Regional and case-bv-casa oonditioos. The actmry must cora(^ with any regional astidiliOQS tsiuch may have been added by the dhosion cagmeer (see 33 CFR 330.4(eJ) and any one specific conditioos added by the Ccrpt 7 Wild and Scenic Rivers. No actnlty may ®xur to a ccmpwient of the National Wild and Scenic RKcr System, or m a over officullv designated by Congress as a *audy river' for pcssiWc inclusion in the system, while the nver is in an offiaal study stat'us. Information on Wild and Sccatc Riven may be obtained from the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Scmce. 8 Tribal nchts. No activity or its ope.'ation may impair reserved inbal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved soter rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights. 9 W,itef Quality certification. In certain states, an individual state saier quality certification must bc obtained or waived (sec 33 CFR 330.4(c)). 10. Coastal rone rriana^^ement . In certain state, an individual state coastal zone m.inagcment coftSisteocy concurrence must bc obuined or waived, (see 33 CFR 330.4(d)). 11. 1-ndangered Gpeaes. No actMty is authofued under any N\VT which is likely to jeopardize the continued eiostencc of a threatened or endangered spec.es or a sfcc.es proposed for such designation, as tdenufied under the Federal Endangered Spcacs Act, or which is Ukcly to destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of st^ch species. Noo-fedcral pemittecs shall notify the distna engineer if any listed species or critical habiut might bc affeacd or is in the vicinity of the project and shall not begin work 00 L*-- activity unul notified by the distria engmeer that the requirements of the Endangered Spcacs Act have been satisfied and that the aahnty is authorized. Inforroattoo on the location of threatened and endangered speoes and their critical habitat can bc obtained from the Ui Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Ftshencs Service, (see 33 CFR 330.4(f)) 12. Histone propenies. No activity which may affca llistorK properties listed, or elipble for listing, lO the National Register of Historic Pla<» is authorial, until the DE has oorrplicd with the provisions of 33 CFR 325, Appendix C. The prospective permittee must notify the distnct engineer if the authorized activity may affect any histone properties listed, determined to be eligible, or which the prospcaivc permittee h.is reason to believe may bc eligible for listing on the National Register of Histxic Places, and shat! not begin the activuy unul notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National Historic preservation Aa have been satisfied and that the actn^iiy is authorized. Information 00 the location and existence of historic resources can bc obtained from the .State Histone Preservation Of.icc and the National Register of Histone Pbees (sec 33 CFR 3.m4(g)). m f)m, In addnot. lo ifte Oratm CimWmoi. UK MkfMf ^ mvavc d,«scd o. « m«a,dl «d m« W « «dar to> amNnnr.,.- tw .no na..«.Kjo pcffTiits to te v iiKj Supply mia&^ cisxpi wnerc trie dtseturge is for tepaa oi t!K puWic water s»ppiy subilaatiOd. _, . . ^ ^1 ■ rtin-rt fwi itPTul fn3T ocoif ifi arcjLs oC cooceflt mted sJicBfisli »r nau^Kidn . 3 SuitaWe matenat. No liscliaf^ of dredged or N materia may ^ vn nf debro. Of bod.0. cCcT^ maieml ddcJarjed m«i be free from ie« potlutan^ « tone amount* (see sectwo 307 of itftc Clean Water ActX a D««a,p. ol daadjad « en d^rnal «».«.» o» to rodMlo IW nvanmun eatenl ptaclKal* M to proi« to ('t^ on to), unles to OE KB arr"aKd a compens ation miiigaiion pUn for the speafic regulated acuvicy. 3 Srawnmi areas. Dt*char|e» « spawnin| areas dunng spasming seasons must be avoided to tllC mMmuni extent pfaetkaWe. 6 Obstruction o f h.ch flov«. To the maximum eeent («ctiablc. dachar^ must ooi knpedTIhr^ge of iKxmal oT expected higb flow or cause tbe retocation of the water (unles. the primary purpose of the fin is to imptxmd u-aters). 7. Adverse impacts from impoundments If the discharge acats an impoundment of ® ,he aquatK: system aused S^the accelerated passage of water and^ the function of ,ts flow shal be m.mmued 10 the maximum extent practiobte. a Waterfowl breedint areas. Discharges into breeding areas for migratory «tltcrfbwl must be avoided to the maximum extent praaicablc. 9, Removal of temporary fins. Any temporary filU must be removed in their eniirety and the affccied areas returned to their preextsung elevation. H /DO i-f=t '7'7f£' (^A"T»4' Pc.'^'£> ^ s-'Co ‘ o'wTj'aA-^r "TA k . ^ jL> -h> P 4?. ;! /ejo— ( ! _^'0-A-T>f poc-^:i> v.vni>cK U. !:» I PiCVVfK^^ 57;>' )C /CO^ M-r*'b ThTK^ 'f‘AJ-0 V'^o rvN ♦ ■•■- .A.tu I .IIA, .,iJkAh: V.:S5 IxVmdrndLciZ Certiricate of Survey Tor Eidcn Construction of Lot I. Block 2. DAYS IDE LAriOiriG Hennepin County. Minnesota V CITYOFORONO A SITE PUM __ GRADIMG PLAN XAPPnOVED(5<?Zv<frT7^ ) LI APPHOVED WITH REVISIONS U DISAPPnOV,E l3Y_vf9M DATE_____2 -2- - a / I UAKGSHOnE C. 'A'GTLANUS i R E G U L A T 1 0 M S onoMn on'jiii-'.MCi- pnoHiuirr-; {•./sCAVA1 lOM. FlU IfJO. Cil lADiNO. DnrDCii'iL'. ii'Er; rutiviov/'L on . COOGTRUCTlOn 01- AMV !-;iMIJ s - Win UN VG rr or anv r.i lOHaion r r of any we i i.ANLvj^_ | ^^^.^^MIT‘; Anr. nn'.vjiniio ron ^|jCKS. GCAV7AI.L5. lllPliAl’ T“T- CITY OF OP.OMO ftrniiu.H__GnAnirion.'-n • 1 Arpnovrn ilAr11!iA’f:nviirii|ii.:vi;-.i-:i|r, •KfjAlTn'.iLIO • l»v_______________ I* ^ \ ^ . m — I» • •• * m •’9 drir. . . ^VPCSti Moenn fi=><-n+ Pon I> ^ S*^*3S'4rU M7J4’ ScaU^ ,• \ t*:: * / .* f hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot I,| Clock 2, OAV> CE LANUll ■i the location of all existing buildings. If any, tliereon, and tlie proposed location of a proposed building. It does nofl ourporl to sliov/ any otl?er'Improvements or encroachments. KImprovements « »*COFFIII & GROMOEIIG, INC. jiale: I Inch » 100 feet Uate :.. January 23, 1909 0 OTg Iron marker Spot elevation Mark S. Gronberg Md. Lie. No. 12755 Engineers. Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota ( i^Oiituni :. assumed \ CITY OF ORONOJ City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2455 A I^SOLDTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF BAYSIDB LANDING APPLICATION NO. 1171 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organised and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision application of a plat by Paul D. Swanson, President of Landmark Construction, Inc. a Minnesota Corporation, (hereinafter "the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of both the RR-lA and LR-IA zoning districts finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2301. 2. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for a public road, shown as County Road No. 84. 3. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utilities easements. Creation of a new private road shewn on the plat as Outlet D, to be known nenceforth as Landmark Drive. 5. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the Subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlet; the Subdivider has created non—exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said Outlet in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. Page 1 of 3 r r L 4 N- Citv of 0R0>0 CITY OF ORONQ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ___2455 1 U £ < on to •■he citv of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limit'aAon^^ the use of wetlands and dr.inageways d«Jribed ’therein and shown on the plat as -drainage easements-. 7 The execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for completion of certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval. fl T^xecution of a special lot combination over Lot 1, 2 Bl^ck 2 and Outlot A, defining the shared ownership of the two lots with the riparian Outlot. The use of Outlot A is limited to one residential dock with ®^inSstructures are to be constructed on the Outlot, nor shall a parking area be installed on said Outlot. 9. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication fee in the amount of $loo.oo. 10. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount of 5150.ou. ll.Payment to the City for the final plat application fee of $150.00. NOW, THBRBPORB, BB IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of of Orono hereby approves the plat of Bayside Landing, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. The plat of Bayside Landing provides the only approved legal access to four properties as follows: ^ r and Lot 1, Block 2 Bayside Landing shall be served oy f D. Lot 2, Block 2 Bayside Landing shall be served by . and either B or C. Lot 1, Block 1 Bayside Landing shall be served by Outlot D. Property defined as exception on t p shall be served by Outlets B and D. The Subdivider shall be responsible fo- granting the access easements to benefittiSg lots depending on final ownership of driveway Outlets B & C. has not been filed by the date specified above. In that Page 2 of 3 r i * * I OF 1 ORONO City of OROINO resolution oft he city council 2689 A RBSOLDTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO municipal zoning code c-rc-ioSioT ss, subdivision 8 and granting a conditional use permit per section 10.03, subdivision 19 PILE #1433 nti-te-* ie Id (hereinafter "the WHEREAS, uozen ^oropertv located at 3 9 2 5 applicant") is of Orono thereinafter “City") and Watertown Road within the c^w/ o. legally described as follows: Exhibit A (hereinafter "the property"); and _ ■'0 03, Subdivision 19# Section WHEREAS, pTesolution ^2610 (Condition :io. 10.55, Subdivision 3 ana . 4 on ^o -he Citv of Orono to 15), the applicant has t,^va 1* of pea\ from'the wetlands permit the annual excavat.on/.emo P ^ Line Trail, located within the property on the sou.h o. ...e .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Fiie #1433 2 '"he orooertv is located in the RR-IA ' gg^^f La-xeshore Residential Zoning orioerty area, 2 acres of which must be contiguous. consists of a total of 20.56 acres. 3. The Orono Planning on August 21, 1989 and recommended approval of^^ following variance and conditional use permit, cased on ^he * findings; A) Per Orono Resolution *2610, g ^oerm^^ applicant was directed to file a conaiwxon ‘j-gial for the annual removal of peat used in t e growing of plants on the property. 3) In a report dated August 17, 1989 J?^®!1^^2and-. • noted that "the continued excavation a . on a limited scale (300 cubic yards) will hav minimal effect on the marsh". Page 1 of 5 I ■ ■I CITYI■ ORONO Citv of 0R0>0 resolution of the city council NO.2633 ^xr OOO cable vards of peat has D) Approxiinateli 3,000 - years with- renoved from the wetlLd or the wildlife out any negative impac. on Di^ ^ ^• o' oonding areas will enhance ^lldUfl hS -°d improve water storage. 4. The City Council this property are ?®^^^J-g^,Qning district; that granting the to other property m ^fect traffic conditions, variance would "°t hVr ard "liaht, air r.or pose a ^ merely serve as aroperties: would „ ^ueviate convenience io ihe applicar.w bu. is . .................. liabt, air nor 'id not nerely serve as neighboring "‘f ® ^ is necessary to allevia convenience to the d'fficulty; is necessary to a demonstrable harcsnip " ah'" of the aoolicant; and preserve a substantial property^ would be in ® ^fVvTe Citv.Code and Comprehensive ?ian o. ^he • , r- f-h^t crant ’ng a conditional use 5. The City Council ^excavation of peat from oermit to allow the \ "not be detrimental to the wetland on a limited scale i oublic, would the health, safety c ?^‘'^.®”\r!^"ornose rfire hazard or nor adversely arfecr lignt# ies, nor wixi LtVt rnd “roie;t.?v\%^7"^e ’'.=“n/nrcoa; and Comprebensivs Plan of the City. CONCLDSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the Zoning Code City Council hereby grants a "variance to Muni ^ conditional «;ee-^ions 10.55, Subdivision 8, grants appro Orono ^n- per-rt per loliowin. Resolution #2610 (Condition 15), subject conditions: 1. The annual excavation of ^^®j„ited^t^the south of the Luce Line shall be limitea vards. Page 2 of 5 1 ■' I OF 1 ORON<^ City of OROISO resolution of the city council NO.2633 2. Appiiejnt .u.= oI pe.t to b« a plan for erosion control. execute a ons* of "his conditional use permit, forth the special ^inal olat approval by the If a?plica:.t has not fi- ^ - "1990 (per Orono Resolution deadline date or * ^5^* a Conservation and Flowage #2610), than June!, 1990 or this Easement wiwh wg:-. null and void. condit.ionai use pe.^niw ^ V.V resolution run with whe 4. Authorities hut are permissive only and orooerty not with the app " * 2' ^ building permit -or inust be exercised oy V.f on^vear of the date of Council the SSnditi'ons o£ this resolution wil- ?Li da?r (August 28. 1990,. 5. Violation of or n°n-co.pliance wit^any^of ;ro “at!on conditions of ,J^opatical ly terminate any of the toning coce, -nd ^ shall be ounishable as aauthority grantee nerein, ana sha misdemeanor. the property Page 3 of 5 Citv of OROINO CITY OF OBONO resolution of the city council 2688NO. nrnno C'tv Council on this 28th -ay o- Adopted by the Orono C-ty v. August# 1989. 33 ▲ • (/Soperty C*^ner C s ) ir / STATS OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ttae sf'<now 1 edoeo before nte on The fo-ecoing instri^’nen-^ james H*. Grabek 6 Dorothy M. this 28th day of the City of Orono# a ^''i^nesota Hallin# Mayor ^ ^ vJ ^nd d ’’nstr^Sient was executed on oehal-municipal corporation and sa-d -nsc- of the City. Page 4 of 5 I■ ORONO Citv of OROINO resolution of the city council 2688 STATE OF MIIiNSSCTA ) COUNTY OP HENNEFT*!' ) On this '-09nV ^ wi^-^^in"and "for said countyi peFscnally •-^e^ore rae a Notary n_______________—^-------- Appeared / H-----tl'r[It^<iPchbed in and who executec known no -.= be 'L-.e "“‘‘'\’„oriedQed that he (they) exec-.ted foregoing acTand deed, the saine as his iwneir; ) ss. £M£C 9 sO ; J:' (f/ li} /./Ai notary ? u i J ^OLL- a 1J^LR i2^K-SCh.. r-.; ? i. .* f H»NNt?iN CC-M'f . S my COMMISSION EXPIRES ^'"A'^'E OF MllTNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) a on this ______ ‘^^^d°^o r s^d^e^ntY. p^ion!fl^ly ‘'appeared ^^fU^fSftS^fSTexe^uted the sa.e as his (their) free act and deed. n 11 Sot S^UBL?^^, ^^^VscHtmER :•• My to’^7i‘o2 •a''pi««»6-«-’3 HtNNiPIN COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 ■ I Ir .1^ . < I'Aet Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers A Architects November 15, 1994 Arr*'v5:?L^ Cccot,,''yv fC**tl i iarekroevk ttnArf •? * .rasr C *fV»#"v*r* - y»^e»e ^5 <S t •-■’'•r *-or« • >iC>es '! •ccr^ 0 V Ccave^ Z c:sAe<,r»^ -0^«-S A •«vr * Cc*ron •!t •^-r^ •• fc-er A *?5f •?,;j^3 C k3i«c:i »f •car*^ C •cM»« A e .e^ A iffc^CC*^ •f v#rt A •? v<-#e ' *c >g e *ea •-vr-e% t A>i:€»K>-“ ♦ ^ c rj^ret. •« **'C'~ei A ;r'^ •rcr’: • *1 Ven-*^e Vf#r * «*4A Agnes V tr»g, A C.*VC*er C *S■ e-ei # '.‘le^ .e *v C »mu* •: fern 4. A-enee ^| Cenr«r^ • Aro^rvx* •£ ^’»*e 3 *5^ •? Mj-e A Set C«*v W Vorr- *S •#U - Gjr*^C« A ■ A 2j''<e* ^ JaoeAu ' •*1 A 441 k.^'-’cr. **t ve t J *1vtti s .f-'se*\ *£. e**%*i3 C *€<4^** »fC’4> - Af •; Aei*" 3 'eca *C Caug«et ▲ ^e«. »€ S Gwite*»A ef CfC^O CA^r •• •eu 0 •“e.e* •! mur^ ? Career •£ Crer#i A £*c«ic*- L#o M •-* r- V Cv;-' ^4-r.. f Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Perkins Wildlife Ponds File No. 139-1982 Dear Jeanne, Wc have reviewed the proposal to create two open water wildlife ponds within an existing Tvpe 2 wetland. As the wetland is not a DNR wetland, the jurisdiction for wetland alterations is with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Local Government Lnit (LGU) for Orono. The LGU has already reviewed the alteration and will not require a permit to do the work. The proposed w-ildlife ponds are acceptable from an engineering standpoint. However, we request the following information be provided prior to construction: -Method and'or equipment proposed to complete the excavation and transport off site • Routes to be used for equipment access and transporting the material -Schedule describing which times of the year the work will take place •Location proposed for material storage Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK Sc ASSOCIATES, INC. J).4u*jyi Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. 233S West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ♦ 6I2-636-4600 r :tfn -- r 15 November 1994 Orono Planning Commission /City Council P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is in support of the Land Use Application # 1982 submitted by Daniel Perkins of 55 Landmark Drive, Orono. We are neighbors and wish to let the Planning Commission know that we support his use of the land as stated in the application. Sincerely yours. James M. Todd Patricia B. Todd 50 Landmark Drive Orono NOV 18 To: Fnmi: Chair Schroeder arci Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. Cil>- Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator Date: Subject: November 15. 1994 #1983 Tom and Maureen Palm. 1685 Concordia Street - Variances * Public Ilearine Zoning District: LR-IC requiring 21.780 s.f. or 0.5 acre in area Total area of property = 14,140 s.f. or .32 acres Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 (A) - Lakeshorc setback variance required for second story addition. •J Required =» 75’ E.xisting ® 39’ (principal structure) Proposed *= 39’ Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 (B) - The second story addition will encroach the averagi lakeshore setback line by 10' (review Exhibit K). 3. Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0*75 ’ setback area = 3.750 s.f. Allowed = 0 ’ Existing = 1.064 s.f. or 28% Proposed = 1.064 s.f. or 28% 75-250 ’ setback area = 8.940 s.f. Allowed = 2.235 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2.979 s.f. or 33% Proposed = 2.979 s.f. or 33% 250-5CX)’ sci' ack area = 1,450 s.f. or 40% No changes in the 250-500 ’ setback area are proposed List of E.xhibits A - Application B - Applicant ’s Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners’ List E-1-4 Neighbors’ Acknowledgement Forms r Zoning File #1983 November 15, 1994 Page 2 F-l-2 Hardcover Map G-l-3 Hardcover Inventory II - Hardcover Breakdown 1 - Conceptual Elevation J-1-3 Floor Plans K - Survey ^Description of Request The applicant seeks approval of the variances noted above to allow construction ot a lull second story addition consisting of three bedrooms, two bathrcxmis and a 4’ x 20' lakeside deck. Review Exhibit I, the conceptual lakeside elevations submitted by applicant. Ihe addition including the upper level deck w ill not exparal beyond the existing lower level single stor>- trame residence. The second story will eiKroach the average lakeshore setback line by 10 . Exhibits E-l-4, note the adjacent owners have been advised of the proposed improvement. The City has received no negative comments from the two residences receiving most impact^ Staff inspected the lakeview windows of the adjacent residences and found the second story addition would have a negligible impact upon the lake views of both residences. Note the .0 wide structure has been placed to the middle of the 50 ’ wide lot. No side setback variance would be required. No additional hardcover improvements are proposed with the application. As applicant ’s addendum notes. Exhibit B, staff reviewed applicant ’s need for additional living space and advised that because of the size of the lot and the obvious excess ot hardcover that the only other means available for expansion would be vertical. Applicant has not advised in the information submitted with application whether the existing foundation can sustain a second story. Applicant should advise at our meeting. Statement of Hardships Please review applicant ’s addendum. E.xhibit B. Staff would add the following: The lots in the Concordia neighborhotxl were developed prior to zoning standards for residential development. Two-thirds of the residence struemre is located within the lakeshore protected area. Issues for Consideration 1.Hardcover in the 0-75’ setback area is 28% and in the 75-250’ at 33% .... will hardcover removals be required as a condition ot the variance approval? 2. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. J cm’ OF ORONO - VARUNCE afplication (- Initial Application Fee S2(X).00 ($50.00 per each additional varianceV Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming struemres $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) #1c V O O.t-V • • ^ a V. w • ^ V • , • 1 * * V * - V • _ PROPERT\' INFORMATION Site Address ST. ^ pr urT Property Identification Number tP.l.D.)rrupeny v----------------^^----------------------------------- Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Propeny Acquired Sj98_________________________(raonth,ycai) I (do) ^o n^) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential ____other (specify) Zoning Distria: i-R-IC f /C-j— ------------------ Phone (home) *y7/*77// _________________ ____________ Planet work) Address7AT&.--------Zip: APPLICANT Name ■^,/r% ^ OM'N’ER (if different than applicant) Name ________ Phoneihomc) Phone (work) Address:Cit\’:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request indetail: ^DOi T7e>A^ —IE— UtPrry£.()o^ SQ. fr.) (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Lot CoveraeeX Hardcover __ Rear V Average Lakeshore Other (specify) t- c ^1 • i t\ HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF t^SX'SUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficultv' or unusual property conditions compliance with Zoning Code requirements' (attach additional sheets if necessary) r IVadItne Dat^i Information^SubmiltgJs. R.eftuested>y _t;ith>xiktXlanni g^nmmi<<ion or CouncilCflirani^'W ^ J J »iditioaal iotormalon llui would reoulre coosulunl ,;^.or ..!^ r^. die fodowu, deedlid. «iedule died be obsened: >e,,j.pn,i ,n,1 eubminali mud W recejvej <iv i;:W T on Hit fr^ifisd deadline datc^ Council Meedns Mcciinj: Deadlint Schedule Consultant/ Januarv' 10 December 30 January 24 Januarv 13 Februar>' 14 February 3 February 2S February 17 March 14 March 3 March 23 March 17 April 11 March 31 April 25 April 14 May 9 April 28 May 23 Mav 12• ... June 13 June 2 June 27 June 16 July 11 June 30 Julv 25 # July 14 August 8 July 23 August 22 August 11 September 12 September 1 September 26 September 15 October 10 September 29 October 24 October 13 November 14 November 3 November 28 November 17 December 19 December 3 * Reference asterisk on front page. Planning Commission Deadline Schedule Meeting Consultant/ Staff Review January 18 January 6 February 22 February 10 March 21 March 10 April IS April 7 May 2*April 21 May 16 May 5 June 6”May 26 June 20 June 9 July 18 July 7 August P Julv 21 40 August 15 August 4 September 19 September 8 October 3“Seotember 22 4 October 17 October 6 November 21 November 10 r 1/3% ^ i */REQUIRED SL^MITTALS y - 411 nf th«. follouing information must benihjrnittcd hv ^h^.^ppUcation deadline «iatejn o£dor for vour aDDHc3t»f»n ^ considered cniriBletgi t 4 • Completed Application Form ^ T" Cemfied Propert> Owners List of owners within 150 (you must obtain ^is list ^rom Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603. Govt Center. 343-3271). 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. S. 9. Toi^raphic suney (existing and proposed elevaiioiuMf any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addiiion, provide one (1) copy 8'.i x 11 tor reproduction ./ Sketches or plans of Hoor i elevation views (provide one (U copy 3.-. x 11 ). List of the l«ai names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the nronettv This would Include name(s) of appllcant(s) if net curiem owner(S). L M7ddcndum to this applicatioa. please atuch a separate list ol any other persons you wish notified ot this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Propertv Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour nnniirniinn is not complete if the above informalion hns not heenjncludeiL rL'pl'^aJLSreef^^ provide all informa.ion re,uired or requested by the Zoning ?tmmis ™o acmes m pav additional fees (suff time not covered by ongtnal fee payment) fnthorcomuUrexp^n^t- incurred in review of dus application and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best or his/her knowlcilge. Applicant ’s Signature Date - ?!e'^wneAemb^ac!^^^^ and agrees to this application ami ftitther ^“‘h^rizes recsonaW^ rj die property by crry staff, consultants. agents._ Commission members, and Conned members for purposes of investigation and ventication ot this request. Owner’s Sigrumre yn .Date Applicant must have City ofnees :5 days b^ra tj; « Co— Ap;lSLra “pr“— this change prior to the meeting. S Adjacent Property Owiiers’ Acknotrledgement Form lf~> lilZLPtu' ^ 'u/*^Z4.nL — — (print name(s)] IpnM adilressl hive reviewed the plans for the proposed teprovemeni or proposed use of the property located at ■l(A<rCi ..rr ,fi.t also referred to as Land Use Application No, ________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the Ct^ Council that I (we) am (ate) aware of the unprovement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. //o /y-i. /f'J Property Owner Date Property Owner Date 1 (we) (print name(s)J [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located also referred to as Land Use Application No.---------— I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I we) am (ar^ no asked m declare approval or disapproval of the piopetty or use but merely to confirm for the Ci^ Council to 1 (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in kasl^ prior Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zomng to the scheduled meeting date. ( r TO: CITY OF ORONO SUBJECT: VARIANCE REQUEST MAUREEN AND I MOVED INTO OUR HOME IN MAY OF 1988. THE HOUSE WAS PERFECT FOR OUR NEEDS AT THAT TIME. the BATHROOM AND CHILDRENS BEDROOM IS A PROBLEM AND WILL GET rjn^EVH^^SsnrArHi r PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THE FIRST OPTION, BUILDING A SECOND LEVEL ON THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND NOT INCREASE THE GROUND COVER SEEMED TO BE THE ONLY REASONABLE OPTION BUT WOULD REQUIRE A VARIANCE. ADDING TO THE SIDES OR REAR OR MOVING THE HOUSE BACK WOULD INCREASE OR MAINTAIN THE CURRENT HARDCOVER. EACH OF THE TWO HOMES ON EITHER SIDE OF OURS ARE TWO STORY HOMES AND ARE LOCATED SUCH THAT AN ADDITION ON OUR HOUSE SHOULD NOT OBSTRUCT THEIR VIEWS OF THE LAKE. IN TALKING WITH THEM THEY ARE SUPPORTIVE IN THIS PROJECT. I UNDERSTAND THAT A HARDSHIP MUST BE DEMONSTRATED AND THAT IT MUST BE UNIQUE TO THE LAND. THE HARDSHIP HERE IS THE 50 FOOT WIDE LAKESHORE LOT. THE VAST MAJORITY OF LOTS ON FAGERNESS POINT AND ELSEWHERE SEEM LARGER THAN 50 FEET AND KEEP GETTING LARGER. WHEN BOATING I NOTICE THAT THERE ARE VERY FEW HOUSES THAT ARE ONLY 20 FEET WIDE! MEETING THE LOT, LAKESHORE AND HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS IS CHALLENGING AND IN LOOKING AT THE SURVEY THE PREVIOUS OWNERS SEEM TO HAVE CONFORMED. THIS IS A UNIQUE SITUATION THAT STRICT ENFORCEMENT WOULD CAUSE AN UNDUE HARDSHIP, AND THE END RESULT WOULD BE NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBORS OR EXISTING LAND USE. OVER THE PAST 6 YEARS WE HAVE BECOME ATTATCHED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THIS PROPERTY. WE LOVE THE WEST FACING VIEWS AND HARD SAND BEACH THAT HAS NO WEEDS. WE LIKE LIVING ON A QUIET DEAD END STREET AND HAVING A NICE PARK AND SKATING RINK SO CLOSE. WE DO NOT HAVE A LONG DRIVE TO WORK AND OUR NEIGHBORS ARE FANTASTIC PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT THE AREA. WE WOULD HAVE AN EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TIME TRYING TO DUPLICATE THIS ENVIRONMENT ELSEWHERE ON LAKE MINNETONKA REGARDLESS OF THE COST. IT IS TRUELY A WONDERFUL PLACE TO LIVE AND RAISE A FAMILY AND HOPE TO STAY FOR A LONG TIME. SINCERELY, TOM, MAUREEN, MATTHEW AND KELLY ^ .» r 4 '■fT' ✓ 'W ■pnr.t mmeis)';phnt address]r */ have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvcnienl or proposed use of the property located at id I /I also reicnrd to as Land Use Appitcatica No._________. I (we) understap'^ that in c.xecuting this acknowledgement, I (wc) am (are> not asked to declaic approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to contirm for the City Council that I (w'c) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. R A »• Property Own'' •Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review ot this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building dc Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meetmg date. \•#* ■ ; ■.y I (we) ^ of //.<V o7 pnnt name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property loc ited at also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in e.xecuting this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to coniirm for die City Council that I (we) am (are) aw-are of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Date Date If vou have any information that may assist the City in the review of this sc Application, please submit your comments to the Budding Sc Zoning Office at least 10 days pcor to the scheduled meeting date. 7:^ .1 ‘ V ) r I e > '1 /i. >■ nn: rjirncd)sprint address)'/ / 7^^ />W' jSsf/ have reviewed the plans for the proposed taprovement or proposed use or the property located J, also referred to as Land Use Application No.-------------. Council that I (wc) am (arc) aware of the Lmprovcment plans and diat the proposed ne.ghbo , project or use requires Council approval.1^: /) / //^r__c fr*, ft ________/n hvAz \ • k.* •In Date / / Date If you have any information that may assist the City ”,«»’' 7;«» « - ~ Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning i to the scheduled meeting date. ^ A_-'{ / * *a t iv ' '■ tiiVv the scheduled meeting date. r //I-i- <?/■/ '~T^ A f of ! C,7 ^ Co Ajc 0^0/A- “U/ Ay z 1 [print namc(s)] [print address] ’ Adjacent Property 0^v^e^s’ Acknowledgement Form • , n have reviewed the plahs for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located CuMjCc.it o f e also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. T ^'V I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the propert>' or use but merely to confirm for the City CouncU that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. *. • » • /O Property Owner Date Property Owner Date mmmm , U r 1685 CONCORDIA STREET SCALE 1/16" = 1 FOOT 9/16/94 J i j r 277*29*. ■ k;«. >; \ V V X V X N V vv V 2 CAR GARAGE N KsSlr^ ✓ v ^ V ^ ^ ^ ^ •' < < < >>»»»>»»^^ 1»»<W v'v'C'C tvtv« >:<<<<*x^:<*>:<<<<*>>>>>>>>>>>^*^i^^i^m9ss60zms!m0Sim m< m^i-m •* *•* •. .*•. .••CONCORDIA STREET! I H.i\RjCCVEK CALC'JLATICM kuR^;SH£rr SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE/ .S-^5l Existing Har:ccv ^ A."O'’S"t i W W ^ length ••'J _ X - X 3. Garage c. Driveway — X D. Sidewalk utoflO Deck 3Jl p. Landscape areas UNDERLAIN 3Y . , PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other WIS1•*TW q£_ Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone *.Ou-OLu Too-ICCO' - 6^7 S.r.(D m S.p. m S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. m S.F. w S.F. . tS~S.F. m S.F. S.F. CS) S.F. ^ «S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. :^7SiP S.F.T I06H -m 37gP X100 PS'_% J r t I '1: yi. 11 t r^.RDCOV'iR Cy.CULATICN WCRKSHEzi __ : :cN£: (c:?^cL£ cne ) 0-'5' (n-2SOJ 5CC-10C0 A, H ouse , LiSGTH s.f.(5> WIDTH » X X________ 3. Garage . n1 S ?c. D riveway ei.~i a^.s" ¥S.F. (S ¥»;3s-a2Ls.f. (2> _U ^ X • S.F.f^ \ ^ \ * D. Sidewalk X s.f.^ 33 X _4.7-5"/ .5^ S.F. ^$6) S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. «. •. •S. Patio / D eck S.F S.F. F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY plastic sheeting S.F. a /^3 G. O ther _ S.F. - S.F. _ S.F. (5) . S.F. Total H ardcover in lone Total Property A rea in lone X 100 a^22_s.F. [A iS.F. 4 3 % f- ----------Ai - r “ARTCjVE^ CALCULnllCN wGr^Kir.i:;; ScTHACX ZCN£: Existing Haa :ccves in tCN£ 250-5CG' • »iW 'ii' length WIDTH ^ Sj V m S.F. S.F. S.F. i'- f ■ i' ■*.’ ^ ; "J B:. b ARAGc ✓ ' c. Driveway D. Sidewalk £. Patio / ■» DECK F. Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other ^9.7 __X Total Hardcover in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. __ S.F. Total Property A rea in Zone S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F \^SC> s.f. [s ,S*^ — 51 I^S~^ X 100 •iO % r 4 Et|. HARDCOVER BREAKDOWN 0-75 75 - 250 250 - 500 TOTAL * HOUSE 697 416 0 1113 DECK t| 352 0 0 352 SIOEWALX 15 465 0 480 GARAGE 0 641 0 641 , SHED 0 103 0 103 DRIVEWAY 0 1354 594 1948 m HARDCOVER 1064 2979 594 4637 PROPERTY 3750 8940 1450 14140 PERCENT 28 33 40 32.79 ~___1 r '^mm L:.t--^ -. '- ___________ \ " r i-' yyn»0 9^oom irr* ^ tf 11 aittf % f ommo nooM rr* X i2f iifXf sr KITCMtN f 4 - X 1i5‘* 153 22 S F. tAUNORf BEDROOM e 10 * % \rr 149.•• S,F. •’2 * X 2*3 • 44.71 S.F. . «. s 1685 CONCOnOIA STREET SCALE 1/4' a 1 FOOT (sr Fucfs. • exisniJiF- r I fU30^ - STIkJ^ r .m r StNO ~ P<toPe>S.eO J r .1 ADI t \u: St HI i: VI.Mi X E.MilM'ERiyG CO. i l.»t s Htk« V- iwl MS ' • 1 ^ 4 • i !*%•»;’ 41 TOM niM St R\ L Ym *Kh4^:\ P«4 L^ILUILU- LLUAL JlJ5U!U^iiU‘>. !hr V*CT*» *<» le%i .»l t .4 I <»«f I I N MHWUON lO Ml XHV ! \kl M!VM lOSK V UMl* 'Ac ha^c iK vkciw viAW' h* .m« .m s* ,•%%!« ^KerwHwiH c tnaikc m» rcpr«'<«H»M»Mil !H*ii lilt w^itm »«• \Mi *•'%« ihi pri»prn% 'nn rtwj 4 Nc.Hvh tH rtit hiMh Kxr «iaI% h. iK c\K*^ mJ II ihctc jm Ji««iH »hr jlvuva^ **4 fkr »ni4f Jc%cnp<M«i% v• 'mfH*Hr«i kit4* vK* T»rta4Hc%l u« fitrUm a ttik ^Mxh jtml j tttic •*«» « p»vp ir'H^' **m4\ wktcli Hit ilitm > it« .4 .f >%< ItTfV^ •»• K*^«**«r 4n.if\ .»l thr«ni|rli .^l^f Iht tkkmt i4Wfri*»vm^-w% art mM %%h*v^» '»c K.-\*m imf^*rt.n%| H U\JA h*lj| \iC4 «»M ♦•# 1 4 1 4*» lififi tkiikkf^ in'* Mk«»MI)wvk C *»iKrcK >.wrf4ct> 4tri I •fjwM lri%c%^4' I*I4M loiji llarUl 4/*l' .f \: :OAML\RD Miit‘L:> AJ. IViu-icv I r IM pifv ^iih pl.iHiK fMi»n S.ifiiiv Mjit I t%c»tv \iii»Kt '€« H '••* •% lilWiI »« ilHti *k «»•♦«•> ^♦H•l**l i#^«4i »ni*mMiH*ni tLJ^aUAAU*J^. 1 Kifch^ vcmiN ikn ^h^^ '.iir\i \ pf^ p,mtJ K% iik *»f uiiJii »tt% iml ffitil I .mii ,i |•n•k'^sll«full I iicincvf i»»*l I l*f«»lv**''U ‘f».»l 'intti'r »ki I ,iuv .•! jK ^«,ih* ••! Mifinc>«*i,i sW Pofkif IM A PN V* 9:*' S(M I I»N| ISi I M S 29 ?f f f A # \ ■- > ■', 'S '3 • ✓ A 1 i r X JUt- ^{jQ JOB NO.947 _A.III B^lll / lo: From; Date: Chair Schroedcr and Orono Planning Cominis^ion Members Jeanne A. Mabuslh. Building & Zoning Administrator November 10. 1994 Subject: #1984 Steven Hnglund. 3855 Cherrv Avenue - Renev^al Variance - .^lblic 1 leanng Application: Renewal variance for lot area originally granted in November of 1993. The approval resolution expired November 8. 1994. Zoning District: LR-IC Pertinent Ordinance . . 1 Section 10.25. Subdivision 6 (B1 - Requires 0.5 acre minimum lot area. 2.Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (A-1) - Lot of record ... may be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes without Council approval if area ... is within 80^ of the requirement ot the zoning chapter. l ot area variance Lot area required = 17,424 s.f. or .4 acres (80% of required area) Existing = 16.251 s.f. or .37 acres List of Exhibits A * Application B - Property Owners’ List C-1 Certificate of Mailing C-2 List of Propeny Owners D - Lot Suivey r - Applicant's Addendum F - Conceptual Sketch of Development G - Preliminarv Hardcover Facts 250-500’ Setback Area n - .Map of Lot Areas of Surrounding Developed Neighborhood I - Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting October 18. 1993 J - Council Minutes November 8. 1993 K - Resolution No. 3355 Approving Lot yVrea Variance Review of Application , Applicant proposes no changes from the original variance application approved in ivva. It is the intention of applicant to commence construction in the spring ot 1995. Mr. Englun is in the process of developing building plans for a spring start. There have been no code amendments that would alter any of the peninent findings of the original review. Staff Recommendation , To recommend approval of the renewal of the lot area variance for the propertv’ locaieu at 3855 Cherrv' Avenue subject to the findings and conditions set forth in Resolution No. 3355. Isv r C 4 • • CO Y OF ORONO - VARIANCE A^I.IQ%TION Initial Application Fee SZOO.xy g ^ ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variarce for non-contorming structures $^.00.00' Aftcr-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) % *wW PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 3fe*S“ . Propeny Identificauon Number (P.l.D.) oB ~//7 -xi-----i> •» ----------------------- f ' ch legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Pro^m Acquired /99V ----------------------------^(mondi'yeat) I (do) (Jonc5) il50 own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of propeny: ___residential y( other (specify)___----------------------------- Zoning District:_£ / C APPLICANT Name W c Address: ‘^^Zo Citv: Phone (home) *72V' Cto 'i Phone(work) 72~V “'^7YF _______Zip: <r^^o(s OWNER (if dilferent than applicant) Name ______________ Phonethomc) Phone (work) Address:Ciw:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Coiv^truction Cost $ Describe request in detail: \^/z . (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ Setback: ___Lot Width From Side Hardcover Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakeshore _ _ Other (specify) _ HARDSrtIP/DESCRIPTION OF U.NUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual propeny conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements.-------------------------------------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary') r REQU IRED SUBMITTALS thP fnllrming information must he suhmittedb^tMappUCTfK>n tjcadline, date in ortl^f; for vour gppliration to be ci>ns!dered .complete 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 3. 9. Completed Application Form Cemfied Propem Owners List of owners w ithin 150* (ycu must obtain this list from Hennepin Counts' Department of Finance. A-603. Govt Center. 348-3271). Plat Map (obuined with property owners list). Certificate of Suney (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8’/i x II for reproduction. . • • j Topocraphic survey (c.xisting and proposed elevations'! if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (I) copy 3’-^ x II tor reproduction.^ Sketches or plans of tloor & elevation views (provide one (I) copy 8V^ x 1^ )• List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not curren. owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by City suff. The \pplicani and Property Owner must sign this application. Plea.se remember that ymiE imnlication is not complete if the above inforinatirm.hasjiot been included^ APPLICANT S SIGNATURE The applicant herebv agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original tee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certities that the information supplied is true an^/Oircct to the best ^his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature JjL—^ ~ — 0\\^ER’S SIGNATLTIE ^ .. The owner herebv acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City suff. consulunis. agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes ot investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City' offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each mon . Applicants must be pre.sent at aU scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled mectmg, please make arrangemenu to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Ottice ot this change prior to the meeting. 8 • - m ^ (•*’ n•X%.« ira.m • 9 ■S,1 - 1^ (Jil <mC 41 — J \ > ^ ±!l i (til V i (S) *71-'T TT TT "T"TT nr nr n /-■'•f-/1 d-< i -i / NU fA 1 tMi «■m li®tM Lo^_n.! j.j._X.A nCI • n TT •%. V 1 J Jl ■ t ■'<1,1 V ^!i»a ”3»! imj c Wl CSJ /(ni (Ml ^ -‘ r m I t»r\n ri i ;ri innr*. L___p^ 3 ipf i, mmM toiTsri^ mi vif# r certificate of mailing STATE OF KINTiESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENTiEPIN ) *8 ) CITY OF CRCNO ) I, Jamie Bosnia, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of 8^1984, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of November, 1994. Jamie Bosma f• V •-A ‘V liUN MTl lO/ll/fO^7; iATcn■ % '.'•T ■ ... ^ytfW» ASOftI!‘ OltCJI tttff< TAXFAVtR V mnuum'>r'-> OMNII NMCF«» ASM-.TAMSAYfR .•j$Nin^AOMV/ PROP AOM.<>. MM«/A0MV'* ‘ • A- •. 4;t ir ^ .1; . OMCR NAfC .• TAXPAVfR ‘* NAfC/AOOR • f I . X-1- '.iy /•» AOM #• •l^V* CMCII HAM "tf'.■ > TAXPAYAR HAHI/AODI •' * V » 3*^ • • »lf^MPIN COUNTY HKJffUTY XNfORHATION SVSTEH MOrCITY CM€«S LIST3S M-U7>ZS 5S POOS OmO CNiMY AVf AtTHUP C BPAHBllU TPUGIlt A C iPAmXllA SP» CHCtiT A^l HOUND HN SSSAASi PO-1X7-23 S5 TOM 0SP4P CHCIHIY AV€ AATHimi n EHOtUND CTAl K H NiVfPS 9700 KmTLAND AVE DtOOHXNCTQN m SbHZQS 1I2ASi 00-117-25 SS POSY OSiSS CUEttY AVE STATE LAND DEPT CITY Of ORQNOf AiKA/llyTf ST DEED 15A7SS SO M-117-2S SS 00h2 POOSS AOOPESS UNASSIGMD RATHOYN H ENGLUNO CTAl A H NEVEiS 9700 mUANO AVE S iS2A OLOQHINGTQN HN SS^20 SO 08-U7-2S SS 0045 OSOOl CNCRRY AVE PAUL C A HARY J TAYIQR PAUL TAYLOO SMS CHERRY AM MOUND m 55544 2 ».MOR ADOR ^\>ONNill NAML f ;. TAXPAYER - HAHi/AOOR ^ V *. iii#srff'f?r :r,.- ■ SS M-117-2S SS OOSO ooosa ADDRESS IMASSICNED D n ENCLUND ETAL COL A mS D H ENCLUND S^Ol SPRING ROCK COURT FAIRFAX VA 220S2 - %• •• •. • fh-;.*. ■? Jr'.V '.. •l r .• A «• • •• • I SO eO-117*2S 55 0004 000SO AOOOCSS UraSSXGNIO RATimN n ENGUfA) ITU R m nevers97M PORTiAIAl AVf S iS24 tiOOMXNQION fti 5S420SO PO-117-2S SS TOD9 PPOSi ADORE SS UNASSIGNtO KATHRYN H EIA^UJIAI ETAL H H NEVERS9700 rOITlANO AVE S iS24 ilOOHINGTON MN 55420Si 00-117-2S 5S 0040iSi>«S CHERRY AVfC 1 ANOERSON ETAl H/llff ESTCARL L ANOERSONS04S CHERRY AVfHOUND m SSS44 Sii 00-117-2S SS 004S 05S40 CMRRY AVE D n ENGUtA) ETAl COi A HRS 0 n ENGIUND 5101 SRRINQ ROCK CT rilRfAX VA 220S2 sa 00-117-2S SS 0040 05890 NORTH SNORE DR ROGER GRAftllNQ A HlfE ROGER GRArt4INQ Si98 NORTH S»K)RE OR HOUND MN 55144 58 08-117-23 SS 0053 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE LANO DEPT CITY Of ORONO PARK 4/15/79 ST DEED 154754 RXPOir NO. PX4S5401PAGC If58 M-117'2S SS 00078MS5 A80RESS UNASSIGNEO KATHRYTE M ENGUtA) ETAL K M NEVERS9700 •ORTIANO AVE S 8524 iLQQMIHGTQN MN 55420SS 08-117-23 SS 0018 0585S CHERRv av C STATE lANO Di/r CITY Of ORONOPARK4/IS/79 ST DEED 15475S38 08-I17-2S S3 00418MS8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO KATHRYN M EfA5LUND ETAL K H NEVERS9700 PORTLAND AVf S 8324 8LOOMINGOTN MN 55420 58 08-117-25 55 0M4 00058 ADORCSS UNASSICrCD O M Ef«(UNO ETAL COL A MRS 8 H Er^CLUNO 5101 SPRING ROCK CT FAIRFAX VA 22052 I 38 00-117-23 S3 0049 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO D M ENGLUNO ETAL COL A MRS D M ENGLUNO 5101 SPRING ROCK CT FAIRfAX VA 22032 58 08-117-21 11 0054 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGt4£D STATE LANO DEPT CITY OF ORONO PARK 4/15/7Y ST DEED 158754 . -(KRM OAH 10/11/Wir™: •Mtf4IPlN COUNTY rOOPtRTY rMTOimATlQN Sf^TlHraomrY c»tcm list1 ■Vipw» itam[;TM»AYI«..Knani/aoiui-.i sa 55 00550005a AOOfICSS UNASStGNiOt smf LAND KPT CITY or 0M3N0 PAJOC^15/7f Sr ocro IS4750/ i.■S'-'.fh-H^OMCt N«IC ;i^TTM»AViR1«-k : MAK/ATOl■ A :■ •M 00-117-2S 5S 0007 OM«S CHCRRY AVf PAUL f t rURY J TATIQB RAUL TAYLOR 58RS CMCRRY AVI HOUND 7M iS544»,-►5.A I Yt-V 'i' • I'" - • *{■» ■' .-’k/ 'OPt*-. r •r. I • 't7* ■-»»• »riv>i» . .. • u ' -' \- • V *‘A L. ''its?.'/ «• *:V \f'i!- ‘ • • t *. REPCTT MO. PI%55%QlPAGi 7050 00117-25 55050O0 NQSTH SaOAi 09 DAHlIl J OKtANO OANlIl J ONtANO 5040 MOiTi! Gnool 01 HOUND m 55544t 50 00-117-75 51 000%05W4 CHCRPT AVf AINNITN C A VfONA I NAtlS AlfMTIi C A Vt»U I ICKS 5004 CNfMY AVf HOUND m SSU43a 08-117-23 33 008BTOTU RATCH MT mezz ALLAN C & TORI L LARSON ALLAN C 4 TERKl L LARSON 166‘i HICKORY HILL DR EACAN MN 5S122 |«wmL I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RERRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AM) TRUE RERRESCNTATION Of INFOWUTION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEM4ERIN COUNTY OERARTMENT, OF fRORERJY TAXATION. T» THE BEST OF HY ICNONLEOGE AND BELIEF OAT V v' [. • Iri r;:rr mI •■' a. -' ■ c j - -5V - ^a0‘3ri-,.. o: denotes iron marker set •: denotes iron marker found (»jj«)'; denotes existing spot elevation All bearings are based upon an assumed datum. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PKEHISIS SURVEYED: Lots 8. ami 9. Block 7. CRYSTAL BAY VIEW This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. = o. 37 i wr/rx » rnFFiN k Grqnberg. Inc. ',4. ,' '•II'' ■'•I. \ ioiiis .oMiiu.u.uk N1N yil't ’ l hereby eerlify lh.it this survey w.is prep.ued by me ur uiiJer my direct siipe. vision, and that I am a duly re^isleied Civil engineer and hand Surveyor under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota DAit 9-2I-93 NT-) ><r- SOMt /"a20‘\/ ..i: r' Ktjrk S. Crunbor^ M»nncbt)l>i l-iccnsc NtimbcM2^ loiiNo 93-200 5X “ £• // V i^**J \ . • si ^ w#» ♦•♦•'■«l» •• <•» ♦ w «‘ # “it... >yf ArnnA Rt: '^‘anarK? AKJHc3t’0f' •4-?r1 tcsnt - Ste'/e EnQlunc &®ft..Ac,f - \/5.ri^f*^fc fAT ^ot vz^ '““C'Jirtn'!'?nt. '» 1^ 4» «' i« « ■ ^ • ♦ • • • • • • P.eo’j’.rerfients for Zen* iR-iC - i/2 Acre “ 21780 ^a/ft. Cvicftnn lA? * 16,251 SQ./fv ^ . Of 3120. with vacation of alley. • 16.951 sq./ft. - 73% Of re^ouirec size. • Mot oeino aoie *o cjiio :o existing lots. T’’.->T ’AT«. 1 A .^,. ? ‘ 3f''** C'^neO C'/ 2 Cl^fv* en> ..'ieniDO^ Vl nr., '•a^AJh' SAO 2ne AAr fAf c^j* ,i*. •.ni$ t;rn? i am no; '.-.eectKig tn? rieeo for any furtn^r •'3'‘!an:t 'A rftA^rc: tc setcscKs or hardcover * ^ Tj^->f,w VA'J Steve Snaiund « ;■ I ■ t s ■•• # / i i ' « % !2.ii<SMtHllbniMMaKbAi9£k.*' r,i .i r t f « I. . D CO f 0 I _______________________ rfTU£Sl «Xt*«l •00*01 *l-»* «*TM«ur* til* M.r «*4l I « •-* ^ ;;rl*VfJ.-vV *gr*4 *t «»>l >H •C>4# • ' il pad. ^ ^ ^ xix H.ARDCGVER C-LC ’JLATIGN ■r.'CR;<3H!:-i £T3AC< ZCNc: (crSCLE ZUz) 0*75' /- E xisting HAsrcsvE?. in Zcns 5-;:0' (^25C^5C^ 5CC-:CC0' - "tl A. nCUSE X LENGTH HI3TH '‘‘C qjI 3. Garage . j c. Drivthay ^■U X Z c? J /■'i D. Si3E wal ;< E. °ATI0/ Deck X /Z. F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN 3Y . , PLASTIC SHEETING X G. Other Total Harccoveh in Zone Total Property Area in Zone /^OO S.F. I j - 3 • r • ai 7Zo 3 o ^ 0 o So Z V O 1 -...............• _________; m. \ Z o z y 0 j O /a o s t , S _ S s SB s Zone 3rso s Zone /fe.Z-T/s< S.F. S.F. 3.F. S.F. S. F S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. .*,o Si?# S tr • S.F. /•V . ! • S.F. S.F. £ 3 3 X 100 22 r ^V^S c E . PCBUC IIE,\.R1NG 9:15 P.M. - 9:55 P.M.3855 CHERRV AM^NX"E The .^i^vn of P. T3i:ci: end C--:1:t:03!e o: MiilidS Mr. and Mrs. Steve Engiund were preserii. 1^, viri-i-'t for determinins the buildabiiity of a lot that is Gaffroa ‘ ^ acre. .Although several relatives own neighboring 0.37 acre. The Zoning Cu meets that sundard. Some parcels, no \ drainage culvert was uisalled in consultation with drainage improvements **a^c ^Cwn .. • ■ xvd^'^on orocerTV. There are -nature trees the Public Works according to the maps. The prepertv is in the on the propern and it is . hardcover is allowed. The ccncepnial proposal would .-lot :50-5C0- turclccvcr zon. wr.«e T^e propc:z>- has b«n be a problem on this lot. No necessars- m “rat ‘”l5l^'imtvemge lot sizes var>- m me ne.zhbcrhood and th,s lot is no. 'iiconsistenc with the area. l.,ndo,.st ashed why f to be sure the lot was buildabie berorv .nL^mn^ aic ^ smith asked how much fill w.nid be required because of die steep bank from the street to th.e proposed home site. Englund suted he hoped to move as few ."TLme bl^rn^y be ni^ts^r-!'’ that fitirqulred would he approsima.ely 5-6 ’ in heieht. neighbor questioned whai was being prob'ems in this area. Engiund coniirraed m dmined as a result of the culvert He noted an e.xcessive amount of waier m the spring that had dramed installation. C.afftcn explained Ihere would be a but likely none under the house. If tUl comes in piece • brought in at the time of house a condiuorui use permit would be required If ^ consmicaon. it can be brought in as pan of the building permit. Smith asked if how the fill was brought in could affect the drainage. Gaffr^respon grading plan would be required before any fill was brought onto the prop ny. 12 ■i j r (#S) -1SS3 STEVEN M. ENGLUND - CONT. Lmdquuu expressed his concere over dre drowse issue and cautioned the applicant as he proceeds with dcvelopiTaerat ot the prcperr>’. it was -roved bv Peterson, seconded by Berg, to approve ,atppi.cat:on aI3S3 tor Steven England. -Rsfcherrv Ave-ue for a ,ot area vaiian.. .'or construction of a single tiunity re„..nce on a 0 37 a^:7ai4i ;;a^«r.o conditions lo as listed in the staff tnetno dated October 5. 1993. Ayes 6. nays 0. Ifs O^OR^S^.S-TllE-FACT 3-.ARLANCE - PVBUC HE.ARLNG 9:45 P..M - 10; 12 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Cemneate of Mailing were noted. Orville Fisher was present. Gaffron explained that a complaint had been received from a resident that there had been some 7"rnmg in the O-'f- zone. Upon investigation, a Slop Work Order ^ ^ in Tiinmi^fpr nr i?reater rciTiovcd in the 0-/3 zonw 3S f™" tl'd'eaknn. Trercuning m the o'-Tf' setback area is no. allowed by crd7 in addition. Shoreland ^ ^ intensive vegetation cutting and cieanng in the 0-/5 zone, v ioiauo g c-rhack are pending in the courts. The arplicant has had previous grading violatioi^ m the 0- / 5 saback on nrevious propenv. Saff would recommend dental of the after-Oie-iact variance and look rirp'^ose" Sralion plan to consider if ic meets standards the City req “ne SaS'on noted other activity on Use pteperry as diere is a sewer connection and remodeling occurring which is separate from the tree cutting issue. F’sher apoloeized to the public. Planning Commission and stai'f regarding fured ifwas'noi done inrentionally. He explained that a coUege smden. had done the work while the Fishers were out of town and was given instructions not to cut wi -ored he Both the college smdent and Fisher incorrectly measured from the shorelme. ^ conme^d a surveyor to verify- -.he 75' setback line so dtey could de.ertnme damage, and he also contacted Jeanne Mabusth to begin steps tor “ „to7-Ul be H* is not asking for approval of an after-the-fact variance but o t-vr-arinn necessary to correct the problem. A landscaper has been hired to dev-elop ^ P^-gL^^ees (as of whThad e.xisted. Boxelder tteec were removed but they would ^ large as possible) that could survive in a low level, high water tabic area. A boxeW c^idered a -weed tree that can't be purchased commercially so more expensive trees wdl b replaced. r CITY COI NCIL MIM TKS Cn \ OF ORONO NOVEMBKR 8. IW3 ^ t' M r-T«*reri iecoruicd. to uble #IS60 Conditiotul Use Permit tor Zelma Motion carried. •7. ^1878 CII.VRLES AND SIIIRLKV P\XE. 3548 IV V PLACE. VARIANCE, RE.sOLiTlON ^3o5:. Councilmcmbc- Goeren moved. Kellev seconded, for approval of #1873 Charles and Sh.rley P> le 3548 iTpScrvLance to allow 75' rone haidcover variance for addition to ex:stmg residence, and adopt Resolution #3352. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion earned. •8.. #1879 ALLEN AND ICVTHLEEN BARKE, 1127 I OMA LINDA AVTiNUE, VARLANCE, RESOLUTION #3353. Coiancil member Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, for approval of #1879 ^ IP7 Loma Linda Avenue, after-the-fact setback and hardcoser variance tor deck constracted/refurbished ii. 1985. and to adopt Resolution #3353. Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. •9. #1880 THOMAS AND JANE REGMER, 1205 ELMWOOD AVENUE. RENXW.AL VARIANCE, RESOLUTION #3354. Councilmember Goetten moved. Kelley seconded, for approval of #1880 Thomas 1205 Elmwood Avenue, renewal of side street setback variance tor construction ot additions to the existing residence, dnd to adopt Resolution ^3354. A\es 3, Nays 0. Motion came 10. #188: JOHN M. o sn i IVAN/O su.uv.\NS, :4:o sii.\uy \>ood road , commercial SITE PLAN REVIEW Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron gave the staff report and that an agreement had been reached and staff would draft a resolution amending the commercial site plan approval for Council action at their next meeting. ni. #1883. SI EVEN .M. ENGLL^H, 3855 CHERRY AV ENUE. ViVRLVNCE, RESOLUTION #3355. Councilmember Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, for approval of #1883. Steven M. ^"^lund 3855 Cherry Avenue, for approval of a lot area variance for construction ot a single tamily resi en 0.37 acre parcel, and adopt Resolution #3355. .Ayes 3. Nays 0. Motion carried. 12. #1884, ORVILIT: nSHER, 475 O.XFORD ROAD, V.ARIANCE, RESOLLTION #3356. Councilmember Goenen moved. Kelley seconded, for denial of #1884 Orville Fisher, 475 for an after-the-fact variance and to adopt Resolution #3356 denying the variance. yes , * . Motion carried. 62jiNH01 V/oT o w CITY of ORONO RE50MTI0N OF TIIK Cm' COl NCII t\ IM.\\r>N,/ NO. ttiansfeh entered •X*<£P^«00U4TY ■'AXF*''?* seWiCo lUT 10 !99i N C*?v NT'' V*W*. ' - ■ <-rP»>U'r> \ resolution GR.VNtim; A V,\Rl.^NfT ro mumcip .vl zoning code SFCTIO.S 10.25, Sl'BDIVlSIO.N 6 (B) ni.K -1S85 WIIKREAS Steven M. Eneluttl (here.nafier 'the appliceni-) hM interest in the propen, .oca.eJ" 5S^Che;■ Avenue w.th» the Cty of Orcno thereuufter ’Cto-) and legally described as follo'As: Lots 8 and 9. Block 7. Crystal Bay View. Hennepin County. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and fX HEREAS. the appltcant has applted to the Cty for a code Sect,on .0 :5. re^m^S'Sr“Harris :i:TS0 s f. or 0,5 an acre for s.nele famt.y detached dweilntg purposes. NOW. THEREFORE, BE If RESOL^•ED by the City Council of Orono. Minnesota; FINDINGS This application '^as reviewed as Zoning File "18S3. The property is located in the LR-lC. Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning Distnet. requinng 0.5 acre in area tor a building site. .Municipal Code Section 10.03. Subdivision 6 (A-l) indicates that a lot mav be utilized for single family detaciied dwelling purposes wi ou approval if area. . . is within 80‘:'"c of the requirements of the zoning chap ^ At 0.37 acre, the property contains only 74% ot the 0.5 acre requireme therefore requires Council approval. Page 1 of 5 CITY of ORONO ^ ti RFSOLITION OF TIIF CITY COLM-IL NO. -* * The Orofw P!anmn« Commission reviewed this application on October 18. 1<593. and recommended approval of the proposed variance, based upon the tollowing rmdinffs; A.At just over 16.0CX> s.f. in area, the conbmed lets contains substantial area for constraction of sin?l# family residence without the requirement for anv other variances to the zoning chapter. B .MumcipaJ sewer is available and assessed to the propertv. C Developed lot sizes in the ncichborhtxxi range trom 0.14 acre to 1.5 acres of dry land, averaging about 0.35 acres. The combination of Lots 8 and 9 at 6.37 acre yields a lot size that is not inconsistent with other lots in the neighborhood. D.Th.eir is no other land available for purchase in order to make the lot size conforming . The Citv Council has considered this application including the tmdings and recommendations of the Planmng Commission, repons by City siatf. cominenis bv the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety an welfare of the commumty. The Citv Council finds that the conditions e.xisting on this propertv' are peuu lar to it and do not apply geaeraily to other propeny in this zoning district; that granting the vanance would not adversely atfect rrattic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring propeny; would not merely sers'C as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary' to preserve a substantial proper^ right of the applicant; and would be in keeping w ith the spirit and intent o t e Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 MS 0mm . mt\ 11^ r o 4 4it, » / CITY of ORONO RJrL^OUTlOV « )F TUC cm COI-SCIC NO. '---------- IT CONCI-l SIGNS. ORDKR .N.NU CONPITIGNS w f-.n,<,ncs the Orono Citv Council hereby grants a variance ,0 Municpal S«..cn Io':5;SuW.v.s.o« 6to .Municipal x-Liui 5. -rnr-r^' containing 0 : acre in ^rea ......nx S?c,'^’l?d?“qu,rc 0 50 Acres'.; !o, irca for ruch sub,«, to >he follow,n, condmom: 1 Lo.i 3 ind 9 shall he legally cembineJ pnor .0 issuance of the building pennit. s A sewer connection charge of 5255.0-0 plus the current sewer available charge Shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 3 No vaiiances oiher than the lot area variance are arproviM;aa Vhe siandard lot line setbacks, hardcover limiutwn or adt'rio" N-o'-runtf'a'l'les^ill be granted for development of this proper'" Propetrv owner is advised that a complete grading and drainage plan trust be submitted m conjunction with the buildi.ng pennit application.- Authorities craned by this vanance tun but are petmtsstve only and must be exer.ised by app tc ' ^,,|j permit within one year ->f ihe date of Council approval, or this e.xpire on that date (November 8. 1994>. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the resolution shall cons.iiute a violaiion ot the zomng , mSeanon terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punis The undersigned app.icanl has “"^'r^V^etrsu'iceTo" rnd «sT^ of this resolution and on behalt ot himself, his . ^ hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in property. 4 *♦1 Paae 3 of 5 r //■ >t / CITY of ORONO '\ RK50LITI0.N OF THE Cm COl'Nai. \0._____________________ Adopted by the Otoi« Ctty Counc.l on thts ith Jay of Novetr.ber. 10d5 Eij\vard J. Callat^. Jr.. . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUN'n^ OF HENNEPIN ) The forecoing instalment was acknowledged before me on 8th da> ot November. 1993. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Halim. .Mayor cN: City Cer ^ Citv of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was execute >. of the City. Notarv Public ■rr>v JA.MIE L BCSMA hOTAAY PjPLC-MiNSESCTA hESNEPNCCUVrr 1 Mv Cemra. 12-19-37 y ---------»s\ Pace 4 of 5 r I ^ o 4^ O Ov ■ e:l CITY of ORONO rf.'OLI tton of thf cm* coi Ncn. t ' NO. **_____________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN > On this .^C rday of . 199 ^ before :ne a Notan' p..b>ic ..vuh.na«l for »K. coun.. ^ *c foresomg .nsmrmrnt. ind'icknoultdert ttui he (they) executed the same is h.s .their, tree act and deed. AM.£ L “CSVAHC-AST PL£. c-v '.NESC’A S pDt>itP‘<CC-N‘^ %n#fCar«au^«’2-^FW '■ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this O . A A day of . 199 “/ before me a Notary ^ '■ :■ t * tVyil uiij /y\ r" T-------------—^ j V V Public within and for said county, personal^ appeared U known to me to be the pefsonts) described in and who e.xecutea - -----------------------------------------------------:: . . . ... .^1_________1C h!« ithtfir) frCw known to me to dc me pc^^oms) ucncupcu m auv^ [he foregoinl mstrument. and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his ohea) free act and deed. fm'i JAMiE L EOSVA MJTWY Pl’5UC-MlNNf 30^A h£V«£?!.N CC'-STV MrConm. £oiol2-19-3r NOT.-MUY PUBUC Pace 5 of 5 fwrnWm Mi r re SCLUTIOS #'■ STATE OF m::4M£SOTA ) ) COUNTr OF HEMMEPI3 ) ) CITT OF OHOMO .< u fj c t / Cl«rit of tne City of Orono . H«nnepln : Dorothy H. V.rtify that I h.». con.p.r.4 th» County, city Council of th. City of Oronoforesolnj copy of . rt.ol-t on Of u y uinut.o of th. ulth th. couLu A . ..Vtini of ..14 City Council h.l4 corr.cA°c';tr-^-WT7Triutl’o—. ouly .oopt.O Py ..14 City Council at said aeetmg. 10th _, day of (SEAL) t •r -> ^ »- « . •A r TO:Chair Schrocder and OroiK^) Planning Commis^ioo Members Ron Moorsc. City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusih. Ihiildmg & Zoning AJmimsirator DATE:November 16, 1994 #1QS5 Bruce Bren liomcs. 1000 Cox l aim Road - Coixiitional Use Permit IPublic Hearing Total are^ 3-*- acres Zoning District: RR-IB, requiring 2 acres of dry contiguous land Pertinent Ordinances Sectit>n 10 ^6 - Property is also kx;ated within a shoreland area. Dickey Lake has been Uassitied as'a natural environment lake. Proposed structure meets all setback requirements from the natural environment lake. Section 10 0"^ Subd 21 - A buildinc permit application has been reterred to the zoning (ler.-.rtmcm as fillma ocuvitics »-cre feudal lo he over the 100 cubic yards allowed w ith a hmid.ng permit. Originafplans proposed 450 cubic yards of till. The current plan calls tor approximately 300 cubic yards of till. I ist of Exhibits A - Application B • Plat Map C - Certificate of Mailing D - Propeny Owners List E - Engineer's Report 11'15/94 F - City Topographic Map G - Survey - Grading and Drainage LMan H - Elevation Dt*scriplioii of Request The applicant proposes the filline of approximately 300 cubic yards of fill to create a building pad that would allow a rear yard walkout on a lot that has flat graduated elevations. Arrltc.ani s current plan shows the attached siarace realigned taking advantage t)t the large hump ocatc in the northwest comer of the pr\.peny (refer to Exhibits F and G). By realigning the garage at the hicher elevation to the northwest corner tilling was reduced by 150 cubic yar s. Please review Exhibit E, Gustafson's repon. He notes uiai existing elevations have been incorrectly located on survey noting that the higher elevations in the northwest comer were not ■i I i I li r Zoning File #1*)85 November 16. 1994 Page 2 rcconJed Hi' major concern is thai the proposed Jrise sc.suld base a 15?« pradc down from ihe road sshich sc.Hild nor be accepuble. The erading plan should be modilied lo include existing Street 2rade and to revise grades for access drive. Review Exhibits F aisl G. drainage from the north side of the residence w ill flow' to the drainage way at the north side lot line. Drainage from the driveway and the remainder ot the hou.se at the south side will drain between house and septic sites In order to protect the septic areas, the -neineer asks that a swale be installed along the south side of the residence that would convey drainage to the east. Review Exhibit H. the elevations of the residence reveal no height problems Heieht has been determmed at the highest existing elevation. The application cannot be scheduled before the Council until applicant ’s surveyor has submitted a revised grading plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. issu» for Consideration Section 10.03. Subd. 21 was amended in the mid*80s. It was the City s intent to provide guidance to the building official as to what would be considered unusual land alterations Involving fill m2, removals or grading activities proposed with the application tor new residential construction The guidelines have been defined in Section 10.03. Subd. 21(1- 3), The conditional use permit would provide adequate notice to adjacent residents where intense land .ilterations may cause disruptions in nonnal activities, damage access roads, etc At your (ktober meeting, you reviewed a conditional use permit tor tilling activities involvine 450 cubic >ards loWactumulated fn>m soil corrective measures. The fill was used to'create a rear walkout where existing elevations did not permit. Does the Planning Commission have any objection to properties being filled or cut to allow rear walkouts.* Should homes be designed to fit existing elevatioas? 2. Are there other issues that should be addressed with this type of application? As already noted above, the staff cannot schedule the application betore the Council until an amended grading and drainage pian has been submitted for the City Engineer s review. r • -n* V crrv OF: oRONO • GENERAL LAM> LSE \TPUCATION PROl ERTi L 100 3 cox Farm Road Site Address __----------------------Col'- LdfTa" Aitef^rTon Tndc of Application lobe FileaT\-pcofAppiicaiiLui 32 0018 Prcpert>- Idenniicaticn Number (P.I.D.) ------------ applicant Name Bruce Bran Hoates Phone (home) Address 106 S _______ I’honc (work) 4 75-0''>18 City ___ Zip 5 5 3 9 1, 0\V'NER (if different than applicant) Name__________________ Phone (home) PboDC (work) Address Citv Zip, __(month;'year) »i<h CUP application ” SI25.00 Residential Accessory Use ^ ^ S200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) “ S 175.00 Guest House.'Guesi .Apartments " S150.00 Duplex Credit Bldg ~ S250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use X S'*00 (X) Land Alteration --------- ’ Gradin2 and fillmg • designated wetland or floodplain Gradtns and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ^ Gudinc, seawall. rcDining walls w iihm 7:> of lakeshor •'.TV “C W A » » •? U*f VWMtU •t,. .4 V vv vV ’ ‘T V .* W -tv •»k. V -..'i > ___ , ... • • j 1 I i w' PRD'PID - see Fee Schedule \ SI00.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) Afier-the-Fact Fee • Double Current Application Fee OTHF.R Site plan Review (-r cc .i ulumt fees) ~ $250.00 Vacation “ ’ S175.00 Easement Vacation ” S 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivu. >n S300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) S300.00 Comprehensive Plan .Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTT' Present Zoning District ^ Present Use of Property ^ Residential Other (specif ). k r required submittals 1. 2. 3. r 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (yoo can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for surv’ey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the property' This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons vou wish notified of this application. YOU ARF REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR RE PRODUCTION (11' X 17 ’ OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:________________^Date___________ APPLICANT’S SIGNATLUE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct io the best of his/l^t knowi^ge. ku.---^ Applicant’s signamre Bruce Bren, Preside^^ OWTsTR’S SIGNATURE __ Date l-O !l-f-! ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s sicnamre Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to tlie meeting. • * * * .**’•• bl Ri S (2 CERTIFICATE OP MAILING STATE OF MIfINESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) ) ) S3. ) ) I, Jamie Bosma,of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1985, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of November, 1994. _ _ _( —-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Jamie Bosma % ^. J >u 2:>. >- *r W-; I - ^• • » • • . j iftiil........ .MMJSilax ■ ii.tmiki2 aiy« fi<i—Mini H'^vrri'fi^ck -t*^>..i II I III I" I ir iiTll^iiiiiiiipmtiniirftilflii"^ - X <■ ___. 11,---------ii Jim , ©Ui & T- )/©" * T- ‘J*' E: U e. -ri ON^ X■r,r 0\jT_^ m!Z» rt-H Fv-^i*- *-- I « »• %-r- ••% • (£^<1^ • '1/^ i 1 \ i\ H UrnaacH ‘irsMt 4-1 i i 5.— — il!.------------------------------^ ©,/5,"*l-0- & 1^ ^ v/ /<i*- T" I o i^ <»>#»<»» .ur- 1995 ORONO CITY MKETINC SCIIKPIJU:ki:y^ ^ 7:00 P.M. Council Meeting 2nd & 4lh7:00 P.M. Planning Commission 3rd Monda\ (May through October 1st Mond.i> as an alternate date)7:15 P.M. Park Commission X omcial HolidayJanuaryS M T VV1 X A 4 8 \1110 11 15 Se(jt)18 22 2529 30 31 T5121926 F6132027 S7142128 May S M 7 14 21 A T W 1 A 3III 9 10 16 17 23 24 T 4 11 18 25 F 5 12 19 26 5 6 13 20 27 28 ^ 30 31 September xA 6 mi2 ST19 26 27 February26^ 28 June S M T W T 1 4 5^78 i1 ^13 14 15 18(1^20 21 22 25^^27 28 29 F 2 9 16 23 30 S 3 10 17 24 October March July S M T W T F A 6 11 ^13 18 19 20 25 26 27 7 14 21 28 S 1 8 15 22 29 November S M T 5 7 12 il3)14 19 00)21 W T F S 12 3 4 8 9 jern 15 16 17 18 22 25 29 30 /OApril August S M T 3 8 9 10 15 16 17 22 23 24 29 30 31 F 4 11 18 25 S 5 12 19 26 December S M T W T F S 3 Zi^ 5 6 7 8 9 10Tni'2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24XX 27 28 29 30 31 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MKLTING MINI’TKS FOR OCTOBKR 17, 1904 ROLL The Ofono Planning Commission met on the above date with the tbllowine members present Chair Charles Schroeder, Stephen Peterson. Sandra Smith Dale Lindquist. Candace Rowl^tte. Charles Nolan, Jr. and Janice Berg The following represented the City Stali'; Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mahusih, .Assistant Planning and Zoning .Administrator Michael Galfron. and Recorder Sherry Frost Mayor Edward Callahan. Jr., was representative of the Council for this meeting Chair Schroeder called the meeting to order at 7;00 p m (Ml) ^#1976 DON P. GA.MBLE, ML, 4680 BAVSIDL ROAD - PRELIMINARY SCBIDIVISION - PI BLIC HEARING - 7:00-7:25 P..M. The Certificate of Mailing and .Affidavit of Publication were noted. Donald Peterson represented the applicant Mabusih reponed this proposal is to divide Outlet C of the Painters Creek Planned Residential Subdivision, the remaining open space, Outiot D, from the former Ski Tonka property. The properiv is bounded by County Road S4 on the south and McCulley Road on the west Tlie 13 3S acre property is to be divided into two lots in the five acre minimum lot zone I he lots do not meet the required lot width ot 100' to the rear ol the 300 ’ front street .setback l.ot 1 is defined as a comer lot and the code.would define the front yard at CoRd 84, where there is limited lot width along the south lot line. Lot 2's front yard is al.so adjacent to CoRd 84 and has limited lot width to the south ot the lot. There are suitable sites for septic treatment on both lots The proposed building site on Lot 2 does not conform to reijuired rear yard setback The structure must be moved 60 ’ south to conform to the 100 ’ setback. The proposed building site on Lot I meets all rei]uired setbacks. Access is the main issue The proposed driveway has not yet been shown. There is a .safety concern because of a hill at CoRd 84 Staff recommends access at west side of lot 2. Mabusth noted that these lots are in the VVestonka School District, as lots in the Painters Creek PRl^ to ea.st are in the Orono School District. ,\lr. Peterson said the building pad was incorrectly shown. Mabusth asked Mr Peterson about the bam on Lot 2 which is not readily seen. Mr. Peterson said he will get a demolition permit and remove the bam. The prospective buyer of Lot 2 confirmed his concern with the rear lot line and asked for clarification from the commission whether the north lot line is really a side yard. Start will work with this prospective buyer to address any questions concerning placement ot residence. MINDTHS OF THE ORONO PL.VNNING COMMISSION meeting held on OCTOBER 17, 1994 (i?I - ^1976 - Gamble - Continued) Peter Achey of 4720 Bayside voiced his concent with being able to safely access the lots. Due to the lay of the land, Achev felt placing the two driveways together would create a hazard, while the peak of the road on Bayside would provide what he felt would be a good safe entry. Mabusth said the County prefers locating new curb cuts off County roads However, in this case, the Countv would approve .ess at Bayside Road rather than McCulley, due to the high usiige of McCulley Mr. Peters' "* noted a problem with combining the driveways due to the sleep grade and said a safe acvess will be a priority It was noted that a waikaway was shown for Lot 1 linking it to the Luce Line Lindquist moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the two-lot subdivision application for Don Gamble at 4680 Bayside Road to include the 8 SiatT recommendations listed, along with the additional requirements that walkway area connecting Lot 1 to Luce Line be constructed at existing grades with wood chips placed on surtace, and curb cuts subject to approval by Hennepin County and the City oI Orono .Ayes 7, Nays 0. (HI) THIS ITEM WAS REiMOVED FROM THE AGEND.A (Hi) #1895 PAT WOLFE, 2971 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFrER-THE-FAC I VARLVNCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:25-7:50 P..M. The Cenitlcate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr Wolfe was present. GatVron reported this application is for an alier-the-fact variance lor a shed located in the 0-75 ’ zone. The shed is 10’xl2’, requiring a building permit, is located 8' Irorn the shoreline, and constitutes 120 s f of hardcover within the lakeshore protected area It is also 3.5' from the side lot line next to the public access and beach. The shed was totally reconstructed, except for foundation slab, and would require the approval ot the City. The DNR recommended denial of the variance and advised City' to enforce its regulations. Gatfron said there is a problem with the exact location ot the side lot line. .A 1 orrens action probably would be required to determine where the lot line is located. This could result in the loss of public beach area. The neighbors have sent supportive letters noting the shed has improved in appearance. •s. minutes of the orono planning commission NiEETING HELO ON OCTOBER 17. (42 - ^1895 - Wolfe - Continued) Mr Wolfe commented that the City asked to install a drainage ditch six years ago which ts 60-70* from the shoreline It buflers the shed lliough can be hazardous to children Wolfe said the problem is security He feels the easement creates problems with trespassing and theft, and the shed cases this pioblem The shed houses the pump for his imuaiion sx'stem and electricity tor the system Mr. Wolfe reported knowing he needed a building permit He w as of the opinion nut the builder had acquired the permit and had placed a public notice sign on his lot Wolfe later found out that no such permit was obtained, and the sign was probably stolen elsewhere Schroeder noted that the applicant should not have to incur malicious secuniy problems suanesting a fence be erected in the area to help alleviate these problems. Schroeder reported that a ncigl.bor had received a variance tor such a tence. Nolan commented that security docs not wairam a hardship in that security from spcxific intrusions noted by Applicant is not solved by a .shed. Nolan noted there are other ateas where the shed could be Uxated Council members also said a lock box, which is about 4'x5* and 4’ high, would serve the needs for the electrical and pump equipment Peterson moved. Berg seconded, to deny Application iil895 tor an atler-lhe-fact vat .once for conslruclion of a shed for Pat Wolfe at 2871 Cas 'c Point Road Aves 7, Nays ') (U4) ##1959 JAMES W. OGL.AND, 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RO.AD - AFTFR-TIIE- FACT VARIANCE - CONTINllATION OF PIUIUC HEARING 7:50-7:57 P.M Mr. Ogland was present. GatTron stated this application was tabled from the last meeting to devasc a revision tor the location of the shed The shed is located on Dakota Rail right-of-way and built without a permit. Ogland has agreed to move the shed bringing it to the zero setback. 10* from the house which will preserve a large tree I lardcover percentages have bwn calculated .A lot coverage variance is technically needed but is less than the 1500 s t allowed r MINUTHS OF THL ORONO n.ANNlNG COMMISSION MKKTING HELD ON OCTOBFR 17. UW4 (SL4 - :ilQ5‘5 - OglamJ - Contimicd) Rowlette questioned xvh%’ no penalty as applied when the matter was an after-the-fact variance Odand said he had Inren told by the City that V20 s f. shed drd not reiiuue a permit and no one mentioned a vanance to him. One vear later, an inspector questioned him about the shed. Mabusih said the City now requires penmts lor sheds 120 s t or less to ensure setbacks are met Peterson moved, Nolan seconded, to approve the rear yard setback variance, the side yard setback variance, and the lot coverage variance necessary' to approve the shed in the above noted location Ayes 7, Nays 0 #1960 TOR JOHNSON/NAVAHRE C'ONGREGA 1 ION OF JEHOVAH IviTNESSES. 3655 TOGO ROAD - VARIANC ES - CONTLNHATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:57-8:20 P.M. Tor Johnson and Representative. Jetf Metzger, were present. Gatfron reported this application is a request for hardcover variance and conditional use permit which was tabled at the previous meeting pending review ot the drainage issue by the Citv Engineer and Public Works Depariment The additional dnN C'vay will increase the hardcover to 43 “ o lequiring a variance, where 35-»o now exists in the 500-1000 /one The CL’P is for two additions which were built without the required conditiona use permit The carport has been constructed at a 47 side setback where 50 is require e coat room meets all requirements A S50 fee is to be added to the formal application. The area where the church is located has a drainage problem The house to the east has a culvert with tile but it is failing and inadequate causing the home to tlood dunng times o running water The Citv linulneer has suggested bringing a swale or pipe along the cas lot lin^of the church property which will earn- the runotVinto the catch basin next to Togo Road and evenuallv dram to the north 1 he applicant has agree to msta mg ei a 12" culvert or a swale ' Planning Commission members voiced concern with the plan diverting the water problems to another area Representative Mei/.ger commented that the neighbor of the church to the east is avrccable to ihis plan The church will install a pipe the enure distance trom t e ro I the back of the property This w ill channel the water around the neighbor . plan detailing the elevation which shows the topography to be level along the east si e o property GafTron said the plan is consistent with the stormwater issue. It was reported that the C y Engineer has approved the plan, and the City will ask tor a 15 drainage easement rt m applicant. r MINI THS OF 1 ML OROXO PL.ANMNG COMMISSION MEFTING held on OCTOBER 17, W04 a (US - #19t*0 - JohnsoaNa%arre Congregation of Jeht ’vah Witnesses - Continued) SchroeJer moved. Lindquist seconded, to approve Application ^1960 for variance and ainditional use permil per conditions set forth in StalTmcmo to include a 15 ’ drainage casement over proposed drainagcway subject to approv al of the drainage plan by the City Engineer, stnping of the parking lot, and a $50 fine for the after-the-fact jx-rmit An es 7. Nays 0 im GUSTAFSON DESIGN/JAMES LEAR, 2525 DUNWOODY AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITA ARlANCE - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 8:25-8:40 P.M. Mr Lear and Mr. Gustafs^m .vere brMh present, GalTron reported this application was tabled from the last meeting awaiting a detailed landscaping plan which is now included in this package 1 he bank on the property has failed, and the plan consists of a senes of retaining walls of a geo-gnd nature with tw o terraces and a walkwav to solve the erosion problem The existing stairway will be removed The 43 s f shed, which is 6’ high, will remain for equipment slorageand housin of the iiriealion svstem pump The City Engineer is in auteement with the plan but had noted ihe'ditliculty in mowing the slope area The applicant decided not to mow the slopes, instead protecting the areas with erosion mats and mulch Gaflron s,m d the Engineer did not want boulder-type rock which resulted in a plan consisting of a Mannon ’ stone product with fabnc laid underneath Stall'commented that this plan should solve the slope issue and erosion problems Rowlette remarked, that should the shed deteriorate, a 20 s f structure would be expected in the future It w as noted that the layer of fabric to be used in the plan was not considered hardcover, and the rip-rap will need to be approved by the watershed district. Nolan moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application «19t>x with the Stall recommendation that a representative of American Engineering Testing l>e on site to observe the conditions during construction Ayes 7. Nays 0 (r*7) #1967 K-P PROPFRTIES/ROBKRT OLSON, 4645 BAYSIDE ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - REFERRAL FROM COUNCIL - 8:40-9:00 P.M. Mr Peterson and Mr. Olson were present. r MINI TF:S OF Till’. ORONO PLANMNO COMMISSION meeting he to on OCTOBER 17, (:?7 - - K-P Propertres. Olsten - ( ominucd) OalTron reported the irtithl request was to subdivide the Olson residence from a 17 5 nsrcei leases the real nropeitv as an outlot for future development and an outlet wtth an f«dence It metudes a 2 3 acre lot. an outlot for a roa.l, an outlot to be later transtened to adiacent property, and an outlot for ftmire development I his vvou d not incUu.e the CelTie propenv hut would include an ca.semeni to connect a back road to B.tv siue ITtc uuesiton am aiose whether the Olson p.opetty would be able to conn«t fo .tn .ntenor road Another option was for an easement for a west access should the White pro|H-tty be icauired It was determined that the White property would not bo acquired and a 4-lot di^ion will tK-eur of this propeny At the last Council tneettus. the plan was tevised to not include the (ielVre property, thus, clearing an outlot with an easement GalTron noted a letter Irom City Attorney Barrett regarding concern over enlorccment ot the successors or heirs of the OelTre property to be bound to the terms ot the easement agreemem previously laid out. The GelTrc propenv is now part ot the plan through .in .icreement so this matter may no lon«er be of issue The plan is now the same as that requested bv the City StatT. leaving options .tvailabfo and controls within the lesolution what will happen under dtftcrcnt scenirnos ot The Pirk fees will be deferred on the outlot until it is developed Gallron said both access J^!sSlittel have been approsed bv the County and are wotkahic Hte restdence does have a failing septic, and GatVrort noted it will be rcpl-iced at a new location Schroeder voiced concern over the issue brought up by Barrett in hts letter Gallron commented that ;uiv approval should s.tpulate the need for the Caty .Attorney s approval as well. Nfr. Petersem reported having a new signed agreement with GetTre successors and assienmenl should that occur, and a deferred agreement to make a transter if Outlet H IS used ■'l-ctcrson also said the issue of the vanances riamtimt Commission meeting h.rs been resolved The plans now call to ™ '’S'' on Bayside Road and 50- from the deck Peterson tettetated win the plan is m two phases in order to facilitate the sale of the Olson property He noted the comment given by the City Council at their meeting for the desire ol the input ol the Planning Commission Mayor CaJlahan inienected to the Commission members tl^t if they as well .-\ttomcy were agreeable to the terms of the proposal, the City Counei wou » look at this issue at their next meeting Mr. Olson commented on the importance of timeliness in this matter. MINI TF.S OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER \ 7. (^7 . ;^1967 - K-I* Properties Olson - Continued) Rowletie commented on the shed located on Outlet C qucNtioning whether it can or cannot remain without a principal stnicune. noting the need to place a time limit on the decision with removal alier one year. Nohn moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application =*Iop7 tor a subdivision as proposed to include Staff recommendations MO, reviewal of amendment document tor Outlet D by City Altornev'. and the removal of the shed on Outloi C after one year if a building pennit is not issue for constmetion of pnncipal residence Aves 7. Navs 0 (MS) #196»CITY OFORf)NO, 1355 BROWN ROAD SOCTTI - VARIANT K 11:45-11:50 P.M. The Ccnificaie of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Gaffron reported the parking lot is for the old post office and will have five parking stalls and one handicap stall It will loop around the building. A variance for the .-0’ tront setback is needed Lindquist mo«d. Peitrson seconded, to approve Application ■ilopP for a variance for the Citv of Orono Ayes 7, Na\ s 0 im #1970 SCOTT MKTIAFL WOLD, 3026 CASCO POINT ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMI T - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:00-9:15 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and .XtTidavit of Publication were noted. Mr Wold was present Mabusth noted the receipt of a letter from a neighbor, .-\ndrew Ronningan It was vvntten after reading the City Engineers comments but prior to seeing the Start recommendations Mabusth reponed this application is for a CUP for lot 2 of Kelly Second Addition for approval of a walkout design involving 450 cubic yards of soil correction under the building pad. This plan would raise the structure S-9' resulting in a major elevation change The application also involves land alterations within propeny to immediate west. 1 r MINI TES OF THE ORONO PLVNTslNG COMMISSION MF£TlMi HEED ON OCTOBER 17. \9<U JT^TiloTO^Wold - Ccyntinuevl) “iTimj'of pipe so .hat .loodmg tvould be hrid one foot below the 1 0-eyeat s.orm lesel annlieturt his eneincet and the City engineer agree there ts adeiit.ate tall to suppon harrnfaL above-ground swale, ratter than a below-ground pipe The Oty would teMuire a drainage easement the applicant Mr Ronningan-s letter voiced eoncem with the possible which he was not in favor of. citing the excavanon till, raising ot the property, and stardin- water Mabusth said the building pad does not have to be moved tow.ird v » e“pfob* in, once ground cover has bcon restored The applicant noted tha, the plan vbill redirect water around to the front and srde Sehroeder commented that tf there is no elVee. on Ronmngaru his basic was w,.h maumg S..rc .ha. the dratnage area was not being hlochcd during this constniction period. I indituist nuvved. Berg sc-conded. to approve Aplicalion P197 iccommendaltons or. IX and .T with a drainage easonent be _ iV • i O V 'C. II 70 with Staff designated during constnirtion prior to bringing in material -Ayes 7. Nays 0 /«int«l97l BRIAN KIPFFR/GREC SARGEA.NT, 320 TURN HAM ROAD- CONDmo“ K - PBB1.K I.KARING - P-M- Certificate of Mailing and .AiTidavit of Publication were noted. Applicants, Brian Kipfer and Greg Sargeant. were present. Mabusth reported it was no. the intent of.he applicants livrng space of detached garage, but. and ™ “irdVn;^™^ .n o,der .has ..S st^. can never be used as a separate dwelling as 2.8 area could never meet requirements o c 8 vMt-t I I iim MINLTUS OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNHSSION MEETING HEl n ON CX'TOHER 17. loa; (#10 - »1971 - Kipfer Sargeant - Continued) The applicants asked if a variance could be added to the title to ensure that the> , along \vitE future owners, could not use the space as a cucsthousc Masor Callahan commented that StalTcouid add deed restrictions Home-occupation permits \sere discussed. It vsas decided that this was not an issue in this matter. Rowlctte moved, Lindquist seconded, to deny Application #1971 tor a conditional-use penmt for a guesthouse and instructed SialTto place said deed restriction on the propetty Aves 7. Nays 0. (#11) #1972 DAMEL J. ILVDFORl). 3593 CRYSTAL PL.ACE - VARIANC E PUBLIC HEARING - 9:30-9:55 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and AtVidavit of IHibrication were noted. Mr. Radford wxs present Mabusth reported that the application is for a stieet setback variance required for the proposed 12’xlb 4* three-season porch The roof hae on the north side of the residence would be expanded but setbacks are met at that nottlivscsi comer 1 he applicant was questioned whether it would be possible to locale the porch where it would be conforming Radford replied this would cut otTthc amount of light entering the living^ room area and possibly cause problem.s with water drainage because of the root line ol both rear additions The setback of the house in relation to the neighbors' homes was also discussed and found to be fairly consistent with one another. Mabusth noted there is no otV-street parking or driveway on the property The applicant did not wish to amend the application to include a garage. He was intormed that this approval would artect the City approval of any future garage due to the lot coverage issue Nolan moved, Rowlette seconded, to approve Application # 1972 subject to a landscaping plan prior to receiving a building permit, a time frame on exterior improveinents. completion within a one-year lime period, cleaning up of the backyard area prior to receiving a building permit, and removal ol the metal shed Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#12) #1973 rilOMAS CASII.MAN, 1509 LONG I,AKE BOULEVARD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:55-10:13 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Anidavit of Publication were noted. Mr Cashman was present. !>»<|» fit os^ NtlM TE<s OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting HELD ON OCTOBER 17. \‘>‘M (#12 - -1973 - Cashm^n - Continued) Mahusih tcponed this applicUion U for a hardcin tr variance and a street setback vanance to leplace an existing garage now located in the road nght^if-way and to constmet a deck in the 0-75'zone The D\R has reviewed the request The AB pfotile shows a bhitTat the 070 elevation and al the 075 elev ation at the Cl) p.olile A bliitT setback vanance is required as ihe earage will extend 15' withmthe required 30' setback and the deck 10 into the bliiil tu strmss of the 1)NR has reviewed the analyas information and contirmed the location ol the WutTs on the propenv Strauss would not have a problem with the garage setback but would not like to see a deck built within the blulT or setback areas, recommending the ^k t pluced at the southeast corner outside of the 0-75' zone and the 970 elevation requiring a side setback variance This would provide a stable structure tor connection ot lakeshore access staircase. IS relocated on the site The nciglibotliood is currently being reviewed tor poieniurl sewering in the future. Planning Commission members voieed concern with erosion, drainage problems, and the amount of hardcover Discussion levolved around the garage size and whel^her a nevv CoSrsi^twom'^;!^ appUc^^^^ detailed g.adW drarn^ge “<* for placement of itaraee Thev also advised garage should be tnmmed back to no more lhaii ;0'x20' Th^ Commission members said they would not approve the ptoposed deck. Schroedcr moved. Nolan seconded, to table Application tll97-. until new plans could be drawn. Ayes 6. Nap 1. Peterwn Peterson would deny the application. (#1J) #1974 TYLER CORBIN, 4685 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CONDI FIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 10:13-11:00 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and .-Mridavil ol Publication were noted. Mr Corbin was present. r MINI TES of the ORONO RLANNlMi C OMMISSION MEETING HEED ON OCTOBER 17. (-13 . -1074 - Corbin - Coniimied) Mabusth reported this appUcation is for appro\-al of a conditional use pennit and lakeshore hardcover v ihancc for the rcconstruclion of rctaimm: wails within the laWeshoic vaid. maior portions of which are kKated within the 0-75’ setback area nie fonner walls were amstiuttcd of wood and had rotted and detenorated to the pomi ot retiimine replacement The applicant has provided siU fencing at the ba^e ot the bank to prevent further erosion b«o the lake The applicant did not real:/e that permits were necess^’ t o replace existing walls and had begun installing boulder walls The lower level wall that had been installed is approximately 3 ’ high Upon a site inspcctioiv the Engineer determined the retaining walls would be over 7 in seaions requiring drainage tiles and eco-tech fabric The applicant has revised the plan, which the I-nginecr has approved, consisnnu ot a 4 wide stairway and three boulder walls at V in hcr.eht The Enarneer did not d.scnss lartdseapina. and StalTwould recommend plammgs to bulTer the slaikncss The applicant noted thai'aUhough this plan calls lot hatdeover variance, he would he taking out giavcl haidcover and replacing with grass between the w.alls amount now existmu 1 he Planning Commission would like the non-contormmg drivuw v which ains down to'the lake on the east side of the property removeu Ihe appheam would like to retain this driveway as he feels it is a vttal asset to him and his use ot the lake Smith moved Lindquist seconded, to approve Application 41974 with two added provisions-. Dprescniaiion of a landscaping plan where the retaimng wails are to be ^ installed and 2)removal of the driveway from the existing parking area down to ne a t over a five-year period Ayes b. Nays 1. Peterson, who said he would deny the application (dl4) »ms l.\RRY A.MI.\LT, 2190 \VAY7.AT.\ BOULEVARO - APPEALS - PllBUC HEARING - 11:00-11:05 P.M. .\ves 7, Nays 0. ftiliinifctfki ifii. i.'i MINI Tl S OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MF.ETISG HFl-D ON OC' FOBFR \ 7. IW (^15)^1977 I^AWRUNCi: AND MARILV.N IH)RR. 9801ONKAWA ROAD - ViiRIANf 'E - PUBLIC IIE-ARING - I I;05-ll;20 P..M. The Certificate of Moling and Affidavit ot Publication were noted Gravdon McCulle>- represented the applicants as vveU as their architea, Bruce Schmidt Mabusth reported the applicants seek approval of an average lakeshore setback variance to allow the construction of a new residence where a two-story cabin and detached garage now exist The proposed structure will encroach 97 in front of the av erage lakeshore setback line but wall mmintiye excavation of steeper elev ations which would have resulted in the loss of trees 1 he structure will be located out of the bluff impact zone and 75 ’+ from lakeshore An issue of concern is the impact of the new construction upon the lake views of the Hoffmans, neighbor to south The peak of the house would be at the 985 ’ elev ation 1 he gr^de level ba^ents sians at 9S0’ elevation The height difference between existing and new structures is 7 ’ Nolan noted the house is on a point and would no longer be prominent if moved back The hill behind the home is the hai'dship in this application 1 he Commission members discussed the right of people to view a lake from side windows Planning Commission questioned the intent of the average lakeshore setback ordinance The applicant was asked if the new residence could be changed to minimize the efiect on the neighbors. The Dorrs said the plans were originally for a twt>-story home and have been changed to a story and a half. The applicant does not wish to change the pitch on the roof The neighbor to the north voiced her approval of the plan She said it the home won le built back into the hillside, it would cause erosion and tree removal. Former owner Gravdon McCulley, was present and said this was his summer home for 35 years. He is m approval of the replacement plan and have known the Dorrs for some time McCulley also said that being on a point is important and should make a difference. The Commission noted the absence of the Hoffmans, who are out-ot-town. Several Commission members concurred that the topography of the property makes the pre^nt location the reasonable location for the new structure 1 he Commission emp asi/e t .e need for the applicants and the Fioffmans to discuss the plans. Rowlettc moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #1977 for an average lakeshore setback v-ariance. Aves 5, Nays 2. Peterson and Smith. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING I'OMMISSION NtEETlNG HELD ON OCTOBER 17. \<)94 SKETCH PL,\N (S16) 1197S WESTONKA IM ERVFMTON PROJECT, 2380 SIlADYWOOD ROAD - SKETCH PLAN PROPOSAl NO PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED Valerie aiui Dan Hessburg, Executive Directors of Wesionka Intenention Project, uere prescm. Mabusth reported the applicant has tiled a sketch plan application requesting a zoning amendment to allow a residential shelter for battered women and their children Orono’s single family residential zoning does not permit such use nor does its commercial zones Suppon IS being sought from the Planning Commission to amend the zoning code, which would result in SialTpresenting the findings to the City Council. 1 he Council must hist direct the Planning Commission and Stall to proceed with a zoning amendment The area in question is the old Grace Baptist C hurch, located at Co Rds 15 and 19 in Navarre, which is in a LR-IC zoning district The site plan shows the topography of the area but'has net yet addressed the parking issue The floor plans reve,il the lower level would be used for sleeping units consisting of nine rooms to handle up to a 20-person capacitx' level, A kitchen facility is also avaUable in the church I he building would house the project otTices as well. Mabusth noted that a spnnklcr system is not required for this building. (#16 - #1973 - Westonka Intervention Project - Continued) Mr Hessburg informed the Planning Commission members of the project’s purpose, its detail, and who would benefit tVom the project The project purpose is to break the cycle of violence prev ’alant in so many relationships. 1 his building would give the victims and their children a place to stay while determining their next step. The police noiity the agenev Volunteer advocates pick up the victim and encourage them to place a restraining order auainst the aliened batterer and counsels the victim on what their options are at the time The proiect is staffed by eight paid administrative staff, five fulltime and three parttime, and 18 volunteers The st^Tis paid by the Department of Corrections and Hunun Services on a per-diem basis resulting in S6S per day per victim per child Part ot the per diem would pay for the facility. Other monies are received from block grant and Minnesota Finance Housing money The plan is to purchase the building tor SI .)0,000 with S80.000 down pavment and financing of the remainder. 1 he building would meet the demand of assisting 429 people per year Statistics show the western suburbs nee s for this facility would surpass that number but have no plans lor expansion. 13 \11Nl Ti:S OF Tini ORONO PLANNING COMNUSSION MLETTNG HLLD on OCTOBER 17, ^16- Item^I97T- WestonAi Intervention Project - Continued) thM all police ascnc.es ,nust work wi.h an inlcrcenlion project such as tins one. populated and is pa.t of the project area, llessburg reported on losms a donated sde tn Mound after eight people opposed the project. The site area was discussed. No outside play area was in the plans at this time Parking will not be a problem since most victims are driven to the lacihty by the volunteer advocates Police vehicles driving to this tacility will be few tor the sanie reason, facility is convenienllv located near grocery stores and bus stop areas It is also m the arc serviced by buses for'three school districts to ease the transition tor school-aged children involved. The Planning Co.nmission members voted 7/0 to support Ihc request to a.nend the zoning code in the I.R-IC zoning district to .rllow us.igc of the building by iht project. PL.\NN1NG COMMISSION COMMKNTS (#17) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION *^*^***^*^^*-^^‘^|^^ attending COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1994 (CHARLES NOLAN) the Citv deemed the property buildable when it provided sewer access to the property. (#18) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION SchroedcT repotted receipt of a letter from Patricia Afell, a triend of the Saga HiU Her group wishes to acquire the land for a park, preserve and extende an invi meeting discussing this on 10/20/94 City Administration is looking into the matter. r MINLTFS OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Mti:TING HELD ON OCTOBI R 17, additional n kms (#19) PIANNING C OMMISSION APPROVAL OF ^nNUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 19,1994 MEETING Schroeder moved. Lindqutsi .seconded, to approve the minutes of the September 19, 1994 Planning Commission Meeting as submitted. Ayes /. Nays 0 f#20) PLANNING COMMISSION IO SELECT A REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND THE NOVEMBER 14, 1994 MEETING OF THE COUNCIL Sandra Smith will attend the No\ember 14, 1994 meeting of the City Council adjournment Schroeder moved, Peterson seconded, to adjoumthe regular Planning Commission rr.eetinu at 12.00 a m. Ayes 7, Nays 0. Charles Schroeder. Chair Person ♦ !