The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-17-1994 Planning PacketFLANMNC; COMMISSION MKI-; IINC; MONDAY. OCTOBKR 17. 1994. 7:«l P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COl NCIL CHAMBERS COl NCII, REPRESENTATI\ E Mau*r Hdw ird Callahan ATTENDANCE SCHEDtXED PLmiC HEAR1NGS\PI BLIC INEORMATION MEETIN(; I.7:00 p.m. #1076 Don P. Gamble. III. 4680 Daysidc Road - Prcliminan' Subdivision Ihiblic Hearing ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commeiKe prit>r to t>r between scheduled public hearings. AppUcants presenting variance requests before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced by the Chairman. 2. 3. 4. #1895 Pat Wolfe, 2871 Casco Point Road - Aftcr-the-Fact Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing #1959 James W. Ogland. 3345 Crystal Bay Road - After-lhe-Fact Variance - Continuation of Public Hearinu 5.#1960 Tor Johnson'Navarre Congregation of Jehovah Witnes.se.s. 3655 Togo Road - VariaiKes - Continuation of Public Hearing #1%5 Gustafson Design'James Lear, 2525 DunwiHxly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Continuation of Public Hearine 7.#1967 K-P Properties/Robert Ol.son. 4645 Baysidc Road - Preliminar> Subdivision - Referral from Council 8.#1969 City of Orono, 1355 Brown Road South - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing 9,#1970 Scott Michael Wold. 3026 Casco Point Road - Conditional llse Permit - Public Ilcarimi 10.#1971 Brian KipferGreg Sargeant. 320 Turnham Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearine PLANNING COMMISSION MKKTINC; - MONDAY CK'TOBLR 17, 1994. 7:00 P.M. 11. #1972 Daniel J. Radft>rd. 3593 Crystal Place - Variance - Public llearinii 12. #1973 Thomas Cashman. 1509 Iamic Lake Bmilevard - Variances - Public Hearint* 13. #1974 Tyler Corbin. 4685 North Slv're Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearintj #1975 Larry Anhalt. 2190 Wayzala Boulevard - Appeals - Public Hearing 15. #1977 Lawrence and Marilvn Dorr. 980 Tonkawa Rt»ad - V'ariance - Public Hearinu Sketch Plan 16. #1978 Wcstonka Intervention Project. 2380 Shad>"WOod Road - Sketch Plan Proposal - No Public Hearing Required Planning Commission Comments 17. Report by Planning Commission Representative attending Council Meeting of October 10, 1994 (Charles Nolan). 18. Other issues for discussion. Additional Items 19. Planning Commission approval of minutes of the September 19. 1994 meeting. 20, Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the November 14, 1994 meeting of the Couik U. Adjournment i k ■> ¥ ? 3 ) r I f) ) ? n r f. If fp7 0 rrs, -|> J ir i-T li h 4#i : t 1 * 1 ^ \vv ; ^ '— 1 )' 8 \ 8 X-8 ■■ IV. ® 0* ■,(.V. • %0 >%X \ il;: i \ ■ I r-\ **«• »••• • ci \. \ \ /\[.¥wAY....I. f! f if I h §■ o. §■ Sp 3: 3. In 3 B. o a V* « g’ M O 2g 3. a 9Q P §■ oo I z :S o 00 ^1- ,t iiHs Ia L5 5 i j X inrr 6 ?o ! t:o 5? r?a* 2g c*: i5c» JiTa •?•a ?P 0s 5* 1« ftl :oscx 4 Ot >4 s ?: ftJ ‘S C o 2. i X s no 3-B jU oo l-n Z Og to S' 3 Oa a no B. c K I X 5ui o 0 n K CA Sr n W 0 ?r tia <M 2 1 ? 2 X t4 I 73aaa 'O '.>J n •5 c 2ET R I X cr <a Xo tJli •B o’a.o 3w to *2 t4 o Hc 1u B X2 u. 9I o'e c: “0o X s2 SC, *4 c o ”X'oa 2 g2. o_ EZ •■4o c? n (j o •ao 2 X S Q. no R k-> Oe ? T3n3 ?o* R- X ^ 2 o a 'Oera o o oao '41 w 3*:a X2(X to g & <toa ? 2 62r«» oa ? X ^ 3 3 ^ V 3I? %-2 o 3 Xo a C Sa ut ■< o JOo cx II I I •r *1 |i r? s 5,o V., p n i i? 11 ir o 'Jt ir n * JjJ a* I jS•s ?a P. Ooac_ Cn < 2 a H, o D ^i|3 I 2 a 3 o < S’ocr n a- c ri a — "w 11 « a cTa-0 1 inin HO OQ 0 JO 1 n s iS a 'o 2 5a 2^ 7 X - 2 R ^ ’ua 4* KJ* no f JO 2 (X > o &o T1 n <5 o cr oo ~ >on to Xo a 2 1 ''"i nu« o •co 5 JO 2 Ck > J?o &o 1 i I JO 8 CO 2 8 i 5- o i: t'* ^ a" > Ir -• 5 a H52 • r-o 5 COc o ? < 2§ X S-o > n o = ?li 5-3 •» 5' Is l§ Q Ra*4a P c k cr o 3 r o o a ^ cr sr n 5-0^ o a a "o 5 •o a ” P‘2 I 0 = a.S 1 ' t% 2 > fo 5< 0 1 i a E o 3o •o a.o o o K ? Ra cxu R •ocor s 1 Is ^ o §cr II i? <5oa B r5 ff '5 b;a n os> JO os§co §o 5s: do X 5 E g flipi 5:00 ^ w Vf •29»- o 5?^ R Q 2 •"ii D9 •na R Gri Bel <=^0 » »I TO: ntOM: DATE: Chair Schrocder a«l Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. City Admimstrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator October 7, I9<>4 SUBJFCT: #1976 Don Gamble, 4680 Baysidc Road - Preliminary Subdivision - l*ublic Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA, 5 acre minimum lot /one. Total area 13.38 acres dry . Pertinent Ordinances: A. Chapter 11. Class 111 Subdivision B. Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IA Lot Standards (refer to stafTs sketch, Exhibit F). C. Section 10.02, Definitiim 35 - Corner I»l (refer to E.xhibit F). D. Section 10.02. Definition 36 - Front Lot Line (refer to E.xhibit F). E. Section 10.02. Definition 40 - Rear Lot Line (refer to ExJiibit F). Ust of Exhibits A - Application B • Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Gustafson l^etter E - Weekman Memo F - Statfs Sketch of Building Envelope G - School District Boundary Map H - Preliminarx' Plan Review of Application Applicant proposes the division of the 13.38 outlet that remains from the former Ski Tonka property. The Painters Creek planned residential development to the immediate east developed in the early 80s set aside specific open space ouilots tor density credit and surround this parcel. Tliis specific ouiloi was set aside lor future development. Residences within the Painters Creek subdivision are served by the Orono School District. The 13 acre parcel is located within the Westonka School District (refer to Exhibit G). Both lots meet the required area standard but do not meet the required lot width at the required lot width of 3(X) at the 100 setback. Lot I is defined as a corner lot and the front lot line is to be determined at the shortest dimension along r Zoning File #1976 October 7, 1994 Page 2 the public street IxH width at the Bayside lot line is only a 179’ at the 100' setback Lot 2 has an unusual shape with an access corridor at Bayside at 237’. Refer to your prelm'inary’ plans, note the typical lot and building envelope defined on that suncy is incorrect. This is a 5 acre zone not 2 acre. The front aral rear setbacks arc 100* and the side 50’. Note proposed building site shown on 2 dees not conform to required rear yard setback. Structure must t>e moved 60’ south to conform to the 100’ setback. Staff has had preliminary discussions with Doug Mattson of the Hennepin County Department of Transpi>rtation wh<» advises that they would approve accesses to both lots via Bayside Road because McCulley Rtud receives far more traffic than County Road 84. Matts<>n once again advised staff of the County ’s desire to have the City take over County Road 84. Membets may remember in the early review of the K-P Properties subdivision to the immediate south, the City did not intend to grant additional right-of-way for Bayside Riud. Mattson did advise of the possibility of granting additional right-of-way at the intersection of County Road 84 and McCulley for a future upgrading and defining of a turn lane onto McCulley Road. Staff also reviewed the acces^-s to the proposed lots w ith the City linginccr. Gustafson would approve access o.f of McCulley Road it future owner so des’rcs. Mattson as well as Gustafson report that access to la)t 2 would have to be at the very western boundary at Bay side because of IcK'ation of the crest of the hill. Weekman’s memo. Exhibit E. confinns suitable scnls for on-site septic treatment areas. Weekman’s memo did not note a need to stake off the tested septic sites, but City will ask that the septic site'- be staked ott prior to any land alteration. There were wells on the sits friun the previous ski ('peration. Applicant should provide a status report on whether the wells have been apprtipriately sealed and if any are intended for future residential use. Wells located within Lot 1 have not been shown on preliminary plans. If a well is to be used, the Kveation must be shown so that Weekrnan can confirm required 75’ setback. A barn on Lot 2 has ntn been shown im the preliminary survey. The barn is old and should be demolished as a cH>nditi(^n of subdivision approval. Gustafson asked for detailed grading and drainage plans and development ot driveways to building sites. These plans must be submitted upon application tor building permit for engineer’s approval. Doug Mattson of Hennepin County DOT has advised that they will .submit a letter before Planning Commission ’s public hearing. Members will receive copies either in a later submittal or at your meeting. The best way to visit this site is at the existing gravel driveway that currently serves proposed l^l 2 at Bayside Road, review staff s sketch, F..xhibit F. Park and view the beautiful vistas to the north. m 2^ning File #1976 October 7, 1994 Page 3 Planning Commission Recommendation To approve the two lot subdiv ision application of FK>n P. Gamhic. Ill and Quatro Oil Wntures Inc., the rural property located at 4680 Bayside Road, finding that the subdivision meets alt requirements of tlK subdivision regulations and septic csxle and grants a lot width variance tor both parcels based on the findings mned abtne. Approval of the two lot subdivision is based on the following conditions: 1. Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10 ’ along the perimeter lx>undary of the properties and 5’ along the shared lot lines 2. Possible dedication of additional right-of-way at Bayside/County Road 84 intersection. County’s request is to be reviewed by both stall and City Engineer. 3. All construction shall meet required setbacks of RR-IA rone as follows; 100 ’ front and rear and 50 ’ side. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Developer to obtain a demolition permit for the removal of the barn on Lot 2 prior to final plat approval. Upon application for building permits for Lots 1 and 2, future owner shall provide detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans for construction ot driveways to serve new building sites, grading plans must be approved by the City Engineer before a building permit can be issued. An access permit must be approved by IHiblic Works Director if access to I.x't: 1 shall be via McCulley Road. If access is to be achieved via Bayside. a County permit is required. These permits must be approved before a building pemiit can be issued. Payment of a park dedication fee prior to final plat approval. The City Assessor to review the fair market value of the undeveloped land. The park dedication fee shall be based upon 8^ ot that value. Applicant ha« not made pavment for the septic review of the preliminary plat. The City shall ask for additional tee of $100.00 ($50.00 per rural lot) to cover all septic review. This fee must be paid before plat can be submitted to the Council for preliminary approval. CITY OP ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATIOproperty location ^ Site Add re s s [Cl^^ '"’^r ’’7 * rT;*u;rr »K“l • * ^ •• » ,*r *- H'S *» I ■■■ -—*■ A V V V W rr,rk^^ A,‘ ■S' V V m Sr \- Property Please check one - Property i,vv ,v•fvViIdentification Number (P.I.D.) 1 ^ ^ihiiK L %xt k,TuT^ t L »^k v^fff o ^ i> k. At * If \ • abstract or ' ‘< torrens? Il3l4i60 COOt ROl fli: Attach legal description to application. Phene (heme) H~73~OC»T^ wane -T^r^O~P ~UL Phone (work)_H7^-537^ APPLICANT Address ; W'pr^ El ~^U/^ City; OWNER (if different than applicant) Ql Oewy^ Phone (home) Name Address: J(L.-2,M c.-*- City:—NV^V^ (attach list if more than one) ^^Phone (work) *3*^*^- l'2^0._ _ _Zip; EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size I rvsi \5I3S Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ __ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) \Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres '220^000 Sq Feet Dry Bui '>C Residential ' Other (specify) rv'V<» i/V \nn ru Fv'V# vv vniI i.*U' rf/V'# 1 V • !9/23. iziit OT-vtniCv~7T ' 0 ^316 PCc SEP 23 ’04 leiC? ions phklikimart applicationiVIMQM MATSRIAL NBCBSSARX POK Cobpl€t«d Application Form Pr»llioinary Plat Inforaation on Certlflcata of Survay. CertifiedjProparty Owners Liat of owners within 350' (you nuat obtain this Hat!from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 34i-3271). Aaj an addendum to this application, please attach e separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application, ii irtlflcation'by Zoning Department that Preliainary Plat Application la caplete. >Alna Official'a Si<mature Date PaytRent of fe«B (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessnents). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easanents, Covenants, etc. Oevalopers Agreement and Latter of Credit. rtixlcation by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application ning Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date_ _ _ is complete Signature Sketch Plan Review (Class X, II i III) ! *I i Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement ^ Preliminary Review (Class I a XT Subdivision) $200.00 300.00 300.00 Preliminary Review (Class III ( all non-residential) 325.0025.00/Lot Pinal Plat Review (Class 111) 175.00 f(PlU8 any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application 150.00 Renewal of Pinal Subdivision Application 100.00 .arming Commission end Council neceeeary to process thin application and irther agrees to pay all additional fees eotablished by ordinance. ^plicant's Signature^Date mar's Signature Date Z.^plicant must haVa mil submittals into fioss 25 lenninig Commission Meeting. Planning Commiseion Meetings ^ nird Monday cf eaoh month. Applicants must be present at all seneau a tvlew meetings of the Planning Commiesion and Council. If an appllcan oable to attend a scheduled meeting, please majee arrangements to have an athorlsed agent nttond in your place and to advlao the Building * zoning Cfice lof this i change prior to the meeting. 1 ;« ••RUN DATE Of/lSm** *.^• MTCH OOf.;V'i roOP ADD* OMNER NAHE;• TAXPAYER NANE/AOORV'raw Aooft ONNEi HAHE ff-TI»AYEtNAME/AOM^ raw Aom '•A-V (N€K NAHE .,1^, TIWAVEtNAHI/AOM(I4. PROP AOOR ^(■■/-.OMMIR NAME 5?^ TAXPAYER NANE/AOORi WW AOOH ONNER NAHE : ;* > '^A»AYE» NAra/AOM fv'i. C'^ RROP AOOR - ONNER NAHE -TAXPAYER . ^’SJ^NAME/ADOR ■>•' / . WIWEPIH COUNTY WOPEITY INTCraUTION STSTEN PROPERTY Q»€RS LISTS« 01-117-24 11 ROOS048aS CO RO NO 19GARY 0 A THERESA A REIERSCNGARY 0 A TKISSA A REIERSCNM«t CO RO 19MAPCE plain NN 55359• *.SO OA-lir-ES ZZ 0009 0AAA5 BAYSIDC RO R S A N M 0LSCP4 ROBERT S OLSON 5010 MIILSBORO AVE N WLS m 5SA283« 31-118-25 55 0007 0A7A0 8AYSIDC RO L Y06ERST A 0 DUNN D OUNN a L YOCEfST A7A0 8AYS10E RO NAPLE PLAIN M4 5535958 51-118-25 55 0010 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIONED ZRVXN B 8ERGSA6EL ET AL QUARTO INC 1A24 HARNON PL 8209 MPLS m 55405 58 31-118-25 34 0004 00045 LUCE LINE RIDGE J R NOLH A J R HOLM JANES R I JAYNE K HOLH AS LUCE LINE RIDGE H/WLE PUXN m 55559 70 5A-118-24 44 0007 00155 HCCULLEY RO PAS SHERIDAN PHILLIP A SUSAN SHERIDAN ISS HCCUlLEY RO MAPLE PLAIN m 55359 n f . •• '’t / i' 'Me *’V. ,• ■ 4 38 04-117-23 22 ©00300180 NORTH 5HC«E tiS H OAVIO L NMITC AL FREDERICK C HHITE 14195 PAULS OR ROGERS 5537458 31-118-23 33 OOtffl04440 BAYStOE RO BAN CUFF BOBBIE A NEVA CUFF 4440 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN m 5555958 31-1X8-23 S3 0008 00038 AOORESS UNA5S1GNE0 PAINTERS CREEK HONEONNERS PAINTERS CREEK MONCOWffRS C/0 CRAIG PASSOH 100 LUCE llf€ RICGE MAPLE PLAIN W4 5555938 31-118-23 33 001100058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO8 R LANGE A J 8 UJRRELL <4BRUCE R LANCSSUITE 415S3 H JACKSON BLVOCHICAGO IL 404C4 38 31-118-23 34 0005 00085 LUCE LINE RIDGE 0 Y A C P CHAFFEE 0RI»R4 Y/CASSANDRA P CHAFFEE 85 L'.XE Lir« RIDGE MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 70 34-118-24 44 0009 00087 HCCULLEY RO LARRY A SUSAN VENSEL LARRY A SUSAN VENSEL 87 HCCULLEY RO maple PLAIN MN 55559 REPOrr NO. P141S401 H PASS U ^Mi58 04-117-23 22 008704445 BAYSIOE RO I T A M L GEFFRE IRVIN T GEFFRE 4445 BAYSIOE RO MAPLE PLAIN tfl 55359 . /■ R.V-4tM 51-118-25 55 TOOl 04720 MYSIDC 80 e^WETfO ACHtY ITAL m 0 PETE8 ACWtY ROUn 2 80X 888 HAPL8 PLAIN MM 5555f I9-t^ ■«; ■:* ■- '-'L99, • ti , ' = •. . f L / • /58 31-118-23 S3 000900038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO PAINTERS CREEK HOMEOHNERS PAINHRS CREEK HOMEOtCRS C/0 CRAIG RASSOM 100 LUCE LINE RICGE NAPLE PLAIN »8I 55359 4. <r4='58 51-118-25 54 000500025 LUCE L1M6 RIOQiC H HATTSmOH I V A NATTSTIiaHCURTIS M HATTSTROM25 LUCE LINE aroCEMAPLE PLAIN m x , . H■K * m"^ t t V .■* ■A 38 31-118-25 54 0013 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO PAX ERS CREEK HONEONNERS BAINTERS CREEK >«ME0N4ERS C.!) CI^AIO PARSON 100 'UCE LINE-RIDGE MAPLE PLAIN 55SS» I > | ■■ s’Vi* 'y\‘^ NV "^4 L-:! ;v ■V wH TOTAL BATCH 005 00017 A" -•i >•l-. t-vV». ■fv ’•ftvi’'• •'-<5*v :i'-4 -s ,1 ;v)*vkTCH 00.m'/9 ■m 9 '?sMfi#10 r [r<l - |ip'- : J V 'M i >■ 'i,-•* ■k i"'*|#rp=,■ ‘- il -r 'r^'W'if-m' ■;::?4'^&'' >’ 'T.‘r''i,v«*i ■• .••i ,*iit.’' - ' ■ \*. Vv. ' : •- * ■' f--*. ■ ■Hfk- ,; r -'I# " v;^* % ■ r- . .r- » ‘ A • HUM OATf 0f/13/»*kTCM OOS.vT ^■:tv“..r.;.■W’.. ■■ -<■W.;-;-‘.yvi* :1‘ -’’-v IP*--'••...•• ' ^ -4U '< " c V P*• ’ ’ f " -^ - <. • ♦' • ■ '. ^■■is;.»v i. '.'r'-f: V. • < • *••• i.!«?vV/P,|P'- r.i.t;,.:J| ._.• ■ m \ ^(4 t.' i/ ,!? •:-J ^V 1,^P-'I ; ■ ■ .’t '■’ ♦' ’ • \ ^••v,4i4',-'■ • k ’,* :^ •V . i .’l^P’3 ■■' ' •<:ii • *f« ♦P.’1,f *'4 -*■ *:i' * ' TV,i'. ^ ■■ t-^ ■"■■ ‘1, v:rK ■ ^r-‘--’ f ^ - * •'f ’ ^ f •.’ vis ■ ’ • I '• MtNNCPIN COUKTY mS^HTY INfOimATIOH SYSTCTHWPftrr cw€ts list c RtPOtr NO. PIM5401 PAOi 14 «r«: .-I ■«''.«.•,•■r«"^f .<%' •< *-■vt'»:».''Iv'J^i* V % %•»♦ •♦- i V ■* ‘ ■ ’ •"*'}^ •:X \lb..>▼v>• «■ t ■•* ♦' "'L ^W■’ •* V ’ ^:4:- V-% r*- ^ r—I' ' vt? ’ V"♦ V'■»4f.• • ,# i v-*' •»•,!'; ij: ■• K‘ . f - 1 CERTirr THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AW) TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON TH| RECORDS OF THE HEWCPIN COWTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE REST OF MY KNO^EDGE ANO OELXEF. f ■f ' . •.r ■' ^ r DATE ‘ilNM » T >*f */ ET * y0 i jiLLi^: TON • w J/11 Bonestroo ML m RoseneAnderHk& ^1 Associates Enginctri & Architects October 6, 1994 CTC Q ior-f »t fcfie-i yir intrv pe • jciepp C ^ncm. Pt M#rvr lorvM tcA#ir • Pff CJOe. Pf r>cT4» £ So9tt Pi ■port 0^ PIkipr M fpr»r, CPA •Srw CisnjPi^ A Pt.A Qoesorx Pt PW% Pf tr^i® w ^nr pi ?«vig o Lo«na »t ■oOrt C tUlMA A1 A ^ A »0%iw\ Pf %prt A Mrwv PfT ii;AAWTv pf P«0 Pf TAW%» » AAtf|/wrs A.IA OOA04 C kAfM PA TAOP^ A. Pf. >wne i *r«o^ p j Irrjff Md'trvi. •! fwicrjr P tAA Pf AgnvB M AUlPpcM«AM< c vr«3^ H jtnwt ■. Mii>f^4 Pi <Af?y CX AP«»A. PI ko« 1 Aeg<»wA PC ■■nrifm P Arw«r\ PI Mmi Mi PC Mere A |f« Pf. Ory w mmi\ Pi Piwt i Grwv AIA A #«• kAmidi Pf PAfiP 1 CtfMrtL PI Mihi 0 VIM PC NVn t ;«nir\ Pf W. P^ CrPAi PC fe*f' I P£LQpy a CPflaftL PC P ItaddPowA PC ■»«« 1 nsck PC Ooui^a J ifAM PCO CyflMA Pt C kcoOm^ Pt Pi^ G k0c#e PC ^OPT p Omsk pp CPMH A fmop iPP CA ^wppb ^ t^tAan M Otei jrAtsP Ms. Jeanne A Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Dayside Hills File No. 139-1976 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the prcliminaty plat for the Bayside Hills subdivision. The property is located north of Bayside Read (County Road No. 84) and east of McCulIy Road in the southwest quarter of Section 31. The subdivision is acceptable from an engineering standpoint, however mere information should be provided at this time. Tlic locaiicn of the driveway access for each of the two lots should be determined and a grading plan & erosion control plan should be prepared. Lot 1 has a potential access onto either Bayside Road or McCully Road. In either case, the access should be at least 150 feet from the intersection. The access for Lot 2 is more restrictive as it is ».t the top of a hill. We recommend it be located within 5 feet of the west lot line due to poor site distance in any other location. Any access onto Bayside Road must te reviewed and approved by Hennepin County. Hennepin County will likely require at least 42 feet of right-of-way for Bayside Road, an additional 9 feet of rlght-oTway should be provided. Drainage and utility easements will be requiifid 5 feet wide along all lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of-ways. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 ♦ St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 r TO: FROM: DATE: Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building k Zoning Adminhirator Stephen Weekman, On-Site Systems Manager October 4, 1994 SUBJECT: Application #1976 Don E. Gamble III. Preliminary Subdivision - Septic Review The applicant projx^ses a two lot subdivision requiring primary and alternate drainfield sites for each lot. Soil testing has been submitted and approved for primary and alternate sites on each lot. All drainfield sites meet City and State standards. Some errors have been made regarding the drainfield sizes and locations on the survey . The secondary septic site on Lot 2 should be located further east and noah of the site indicated on tlie survey Currentlv the drainfield site has been located across the entrance road m the old Ski Tonka facility. Als.^ each drainfield site wiU be approximately 40 x100 ’ in area rather than the various dunensions of die sites shown on the survey. These mapping discrepancies do no! affect any lot line setbacks or interfere with the proposed house Kx:ations on either lot. Based on the above information, I would recommend approval. O "»TJ • "O I *-% I I TYPICAL LOT NO SCAU I H : V • ■ f.: ’ r M •_ j •’4 «■ ■? . * I ‘ .4 rJpm CHELS^ AND r ■*2 To:Chairman Schroetkr and Orono Planning Commission Memhcrs Ron Moorse. Cit> Administrator From:Michael P. Gal Iron. Assmani Planning Zoning iVdminisirator Date:October 12. IW Subject: #1895 Pat Wolfe. 2871 Casco Point Rixid - Variances l*uMic Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC. Single Family l^ikeshore Residential. 1/2 Acre Application:Atter-ilte-tact variances for construction of 10’ x 12’ storage shed located 8* from the shoreline, (arguably) 3.5 ’ from side lot line, and conjstituting 120 s.f. of hardcover in ita 0*75 ’ rone wnere no hardci'ser is allowed. Sole: This item was tabled at yi>ur September 19 meeting becau.se the applicant was not present. Staff is advised he will be present at the October 17 meeting. las t of Fxhibits A B C D lajtier from Applicant. 10/1(¥94 letter from DNR. 9/27'h4 Notice of Planning Conunission Action. 9/22/94 Memo and F\hibit.s of 9'14/94 Discussion Please review the above noted exhibits. WTiile the DNR has recommended denial, the applicant has provided a letter detailing his hardships and background regarding the shed, as well as the location of this property next to a public access and beach area. Tlie issue of the Kxatii>n of the property boundary is addressed in the memo of 9/14/94. Planning Commission's options for action as detailed in that memo remain applicable. r OctolxT 10,19*M Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City ofOnnio 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Mike: Thanks to you and Jean Mabusth for all of the time you gave me last week. Please attach this letter to my request for an after the fact variance to rebuild the storage shed on our property. Due to the delays of having five different surveys completed in the last year, this application has been unduly delayed. ^)V'hiIe it is mv uinJerstanding that not only Ruihie and I but also the city of Orono believe the ^ is on our property, we understand your desire to get this before the Planning Commission. Therefore, consistent with your recommendation, we will move immediately to 1 orrens [»occcdings upon approval of our request. As we discussed, the trafllc on the easement and our dock has created a uniqiic hardship we were not aware of when we purchased this property melve years ago. WTiile the shed wr)uld not have prevented all of the problems created by the easement we are confident it has eliminated many of them. Security for our possessions and our family has been a serious problem as police reports havx frequently validated. Throughout the trespassing, after hours traffic in our yard and on our dock, theft, and breaking and entering we have continued to maintain the easement. This has entailed every thing from cleaning up broken bottles and beer cans to mowing, seeding, landscaping, providing the City ivith fabric for its retaining wall and allowing the City to come onto and grade our property for a new drainage ditch. The easement makes our proper^' unique because of the security problems it generates. Loss of this shed would increase the hardship of our security problems. The property' doesn ’t allow for relocation of the shed without significant e.xpense but more importantly without loss of a significant level of security for us. Practically and financially hardships would be created by lack of another suitable location on the property and Jhe cost of moving pipes, pump, and electrical and irrigation systems that have been in this shed for an estimated twenty plus years. We need a secure structure at the lake for our possessions as well m for the 100 watt electrical box, pump, pipes and irrigation system. To relocate these systems wou create a significant hard.ship of its own. r Wc used the originai foundaticm which wc diruni from ITx ITto ICX x I2*insi2c. Wc Wie%’c the oltenoion in this stnicture cost less than 5<B4 of the value of the stnicture in 1975. As evidenced by enclosed letters, the rarighbon ha\-c been pleased by the downsLdng, the appearance and the safety- of the shed. Per your and Jem's recommendation and the recommendation of Ceil Strauss at the DNR, wc will provide additional screening, on the lake side to minimize the visual impact dining all four seasons and to prevent erosion. Ruthic and 1 want to do whatever \^c can to work within your system to keep this storage shed in its existing location on the old foundation. Please call me at 376-7050 (work) or 471-8220 (home) if I can be of any additional assistance. Sincerely, Pat and Ruthic Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata,MN 55391 • l-A------------- rMOMCMO. SI ATI Of iM) MSS ©ITA _^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES kStIO waters - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106^^ 772-7910 M September 27, 1994 pcCEJVED SEP £ 9 139^ CiT/ CF Or.ONO Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE:land USE APPLICATIONS, CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Gaffron: I have comments on the following land use applications. Pat 2871 Casco Point poad (Z?-1?3-U1 u The applicant ri^Lts after-t'he-^act ave^ige ^ i^kaihore lake setback variances for the reconstruction of a shed. DNR Metro Waters recommends that the city jJfiDy the variance are currently proposed. There are many alternate locations on the lot where the^ sLd would be able to meet the city s setback requirements. We also question whether hardship exists. 41QA5 Gustafson Desiqp 9^ behalf —L6ftr« 2?2^—QunwoodV SnAna Park Bavl^ The applicant revests approval of V conditional use permit and variance for grading and construction of retaining walls within the 0-75' thlf i We understand that there is an existing erosion problem and that a rtpltcement wall of some type is required. We not object to the citv aoDroving retaining wall work at this location as long as. the Engineer agrees that the design is structurally sound and wUl Cr^eK"Sa?lrsh%d°o^^tV^ctTn"d\"he DNR "cond'itTinV tor not requiring a permit. variances for construction of a ..v?!*- the citv deny theresidence. DNR Metro Waters recommends that the city variance requests as they are current ‘ f ^ 34 (Baysidewe are concerned about the proposed driveway off of CT 84 (Baysia^ Road) which would require t^n^ding that even it removal on a bluff. Further, . existinq bluff were AN EQUAL opportunity EMPLOYER Hr. Hike Gaffron September 27, 1994 Page 2 current traffic safety standards. We recommend that the applicants explore the possibility of obtaining an easement for an alternate access alignment. It should be noted for all the above variance applications that the courts have said that the applicant has a "heavy burden of proof" to show that all the prerequisites to the granting of a variance are satisfied. This is because a variance allows property to be used in a manner forbidden by the ordinance. The Department should be advised of the action taken on items #1895 and #1968 within 10 days of final action and copies of the official record should be forwarded to this office if the variance requests cm’ OF ORONO P.o. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN i 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1895 NOTICE OF PLAiNNLNG CO.NLMISSION ACTION DATT: of NOTICE: September 22, 1994 TO: Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wavzata, MN 55391 T\’PE of APPLICATION: Variance (After the Fact) DATE OF MEETING: 09/19/94 VOTi:: 4 FOR 0 AGALNST Planninc Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below: Although applicant had requested this be tabled until he met with Jeanne Mabusth tnlicant didLt contact Ms. Mabusth. Staff viewed this as an unwarranted 'i'by pbeed the application on the September 19th agenda. Application was tabled by Planning Commission since applicant was nv ’>t present. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth immediately to schedule a meeting. Aorlicani’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission. Monday, IXtober 17. 1994; meeting stans at 7:00 p.m. If vou desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planmng Commission. ¥ To: From: Date: Chairman Schroeder and Orono Plannii^ Commission Members Rim Moorse. Cjty Administrator Michael P. Gatfron. Assistant Planning ifc Zoning Administrator September 14, 1994 Subject: #1895 Pal Wolfe. 2871 Casco Point Road - Variances - Public Hearing Application: After-the-fact variances for construction ot a 10’ x 12’ storage shed located 8 from the shoreline, (arguably) 3.5’ from the side lot line, and constituting 120 s.f. of hardcover in the 0-75’ zone where no hardcover is allowed. Pertinent Code Sections'Variance Request 1. Section 10.22. Subd. 1 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C) - No structure is allowed less than 75’ from shoreline. (Shed is 8’ from shoreline). 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 5 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L) - No hardcover allowed in 0-75* zone. (Shed constiniies 120-1- s.f. of hardcover). 3. Section 10.55. Subd. 26 - Non-conforming uses. (A shed apparently previously existing at this location was totally removed and replaced with the new shed. This action constituted structural repairs in an amount in excess of 50% bf Uic valti?,,of the olsL5l]<^l. at the time it became non-confonning. in approximately 1975 when code was adopted). List of Exhibits A B C D E F G II 1 J Application Plat Map Property Owners’ List letter of Request Letters from Neighbors Elsen and Iverson Surveys; 1) (hto & Associates - Received 7-8-94 2) Otto & Associates - Dated 4-13-94 3) Otto & Asstx'iates - Dated 8-22-84 4) Otto & AssiK'iates - Dated 3-1-84/10-25-83 5) Kelley & Kelley - Dated 2-1-57 6) Original Plat - Dated 8-1-1879 Hardcover Review by Staff (75-250’ zone) Sketch of Allowable Shed Locations Correspondence • Violation Notice 8-10-93 • Utters 8-12-93. 11-3-93, 1-26-94, 5-4-94. 6-6-94 Non-Conforming Use Section 10.55, Subd. 26 / Zoning File #1895 September 14, 1994 Page 2 Background The iq^pticaiit recently ccnstrvKted a new 10’ x 12’ storage shed which was troted by the Inspections F^artment in August 1993. The propeny owner was advised that such a shed is not an allowed use and to leave it in its current location would require variances from the lakcshore scib«:k and hardcover requirements. Mr. Wolfe has acknowledged that the shed is essentially a complete replacement of a shed that formerly existed in the same location. This is confirmed by the letters from the neighboring property owners. However, such total replacement constitutes a violation of the non-conforminc use section of iIk code, which is written with the clear intent that old structurally unsound buildings near the lakcshore should be removed rather than replaced. (See Exhibit X). As can be seen from the various items of correspondence, staff has reiterated to the applicant that this strucuire is illegal and must be relocated to a legal location on the property, meeting setback aikl hardcover requirements. Adding to the problem is that the eastern boundary of the property is in question due to lack of detail in the original 1879 plat and due to a legal description that lacks detail. In fact, many surveys of the property have been done through the years, and they are inconsistent. The nu>st recent survey merely retlects stall's interpretation of what the legal description intended to describe, and which applicant’s surveyor felt had as much justification as any of the previous versions. Problematically, this most recent version, while placing the shed within applicant’s property', results in a significant narrowing of the City’s beach right-of-way which could cause significant problems for continued use of the beach. Because of this issue, stall recommends that if Planning Commission finds justification to allow the shed to remain as located, such approval should be conditioned on applicant completing a torrens or land registration action to reach a conclusion as to where the property line actually is. Statement of Hardship Please review applicant’s hardship statement on the application form and his letter of request. Given the relatively clear intent of the municipal code, is there any justification presented that supports the existing shed location? There arc other places on the property (see Exhibit H) in which a shed could be legally located. Existing hardcover as calculated by staff is 24.947c in the 75-250’ zone. There is likely a potential for minor hardcovei removals to allow the shed to be relocated without a hardcover variance or with a very minor variance of less than 1%. r Zoning File #1895 September 14. 1994 Page 3 Options for Action 1. 3. 4. Recommend approval of setback, hardcover ark* non-conforming use variances to allow the existing structure to remain, conditioned on applicant completing a tOTTcns or registration action. Recommend denial and recommend that applicant remove the offending structure to a conforming location. Determine whether hardcover variance in the 75-250 ’ zone is appropriate. Table for additional information, or until tlie lot line is legally established. (Such a process could take nianv months; should shed remain in place during that time?) Other. CITY OF ORORO - VARIASCB APPLICATION M ♦ V ^ V /i Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change front original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) *r *crrrrI a ^ 4. f 4*^. > -r *<■ 'f S »i ^ •. V'fc. W V W VA* rrv..... l^a k w K tL • **r a f ^ % Vf-w» « f . • A r ,\ ^ 4 ‘ PROPERTY INFORHATIOii 4 4.' a 4 ^ Site Address Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) f'^/0 s:r^7/ Attach legal description to application if not Included on required Date Property Acquired____i t //I3_________(month/year) su^ey. i I/a A 3 ad1ac41 . - \ . o. P Phone (home) Address 7/ 0i ^ j. Phone (work) City:_ fc,_ Zip: f OWNER (if different than applicant)Phene (h<OTe) Neime Phone (worlc) Address:i •City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $/^O rpyqjjest in detail: \ o a /w<) J\^o IL VARIANCES REQUIRED ___ Lot Area iX^etback; 4 . • Lot Width Lot Coverage Front Hardcover _ Side _ _ Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DBS UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS \ pro^: s?V/o'^iryU Describe undne hardship or practical difficulty and unusua preventing compli^nc^ wjth Zoning Code rqgui^eioq(y:s erty A #es .m umMu. r (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED S0BM1TTAI.S All of the follo^na ipfors atioo mist be suba iittcd by the applicatioo deadi<oe date in order for yoor applicatioa to be coo side red coaplete; 1 2 6 7 8 Ccaapleted Application Form Certified Property Oiraers List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list froo Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). . Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide ore (1) copy 8H"xll" for reproduction). Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll*). Sketches or plana of floor t elevation views (provide 1 copy 8>j"xll**). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as stay be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not cqag>lete if the above information has not been incloded. APPLICAMT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of higher knowledge. Applicant's Signature Q J Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of Ahis request Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all 'sUbmittals into the fity offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeti^. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants muse be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Cosnsission and Council. If an applicant s unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 6 Zoning Office’ of this change prior to the meeting. • • * •« w f ; • a . ^ . • I ' • • a* V ♦ 4 ^ • *. • / »,•.•*** ft • ^* r B GOVT LOT 5 7All dUHn ^~faxpaii(r 'tiA/dU(r - C ' V i'mm MTi ii/zA/n mmmpw cownrMTCN'•frri? TD»cm«r MM«/i*■’S’iry^ mmu mtm vf TAWmil mm/AoniV f M »-117-eS 51 0014 OMM AKWSS UMtSIGWONiiocoiN roorcino laic cxTT or onmLOCAL 0QWIM6 AOCA VS/M ST KCO IL5Mf7SO »-ii7-n SI mis OOtSO SOOOtSS UNASSICNSO T H Kmmt ADC LTON TOOO SMAOOCO A OCOOOAK LYON »74 CASCO raiMT n MAYZATA m SS541. OMO NAM>.TAXFAY» mm/ifil: V • ‘ MOO NAM /.TAMOAYIA Nim/imm so fo-ii7*n SI ocon CASCO romr raJ 0 A 0 N0L7(J OATIICR WOLfl C071 CASCO MINT M NAYZATA m SSSflSO ZO-117-n SC 0007 onzf CASCO MINT 00 1 I OfTfnCM A N 0 ocnosoN iOYCC I OfTIOSON AM nAoy OAT ofTitsm foto CASCO MINT OOAO NAYZATA m sssn wy Sr:."'' • ■ I. >V* w :• * . ^ V OTY IwrOHATION SYSTfN OM^OTT OHNItS LISTso fo-ii7.n 51 iTP,.02074 CASCO MMT M T W KNAMfO A 0 € LYONIANAMfi A OCOOAAa LfON 2074 CASCO MINT 00 NAYZATA lOi SSSflSO 70-117-15 51 iOSS octff CASCO MttfT 00 OICMAM O MCLSTOOH ITAL OICNAOO 0 MflSrOON zoos CASCO MINT 00 NAYZATA m §S5flSO 70-117-75 51 0007 07055 CASO) MINT tO OOSCNAHY C IVfOSCN OBdttOY mtSON TOSS CASCO MINT 00 NAYZATA fii SS517Si 70-117*75 57 0900 0707S CASCO MINT M OAVIO J VOOKS A Mlfi OAvio J rxms 7075 CASCO MINT OOAO NAYZATA HN SS5fl OfPOOT NO. 01455401 PAd50 70-117-71 SI W7700010 AOOOtSS UNASOlO OflMOIN TOOriXTIQ UMO CITY or OOQNOOAOO,4/15/70 S? icid 1S47S4 .. i.»i! "-nI * * ^s 5 f iif ^M w-ur-ts SICASCO ^oxNr toi. t • A C ILStMupitCNcc • • tumtifc tifioi £i7S CASCO tOiKT MATZATA m sssnM co-tir-cs SI oo«f •£0A« CASCO POtMT »cMAtttcs F NiisoN • mnCHARUS A LUCY NtLSOM £fA« CASCO POINT tO MAVZATA NN ASSSl A ■%^ I L I f N’•>r- f:.v„A04‘isi?l;;' •4'm- TOm. lATCM 00« 00011 X CItnrY THAT n« facts RCPttSINm ARI AN ACCUUn tm Ttm itPtfSCNTATION OP XNFOtNATIQN AS IT APmiW THIS OAH ON TUI KCOtOS OF TM MWCPIN COUNTY DCPARTNCNT OP PWPCRTV TAXATION. TO TM MST V m KNQMIDOI ANO KLIIF. DATE iiUi<g » %Z 1^- ^ ** • »'• * •“ I ^ ^ iV •* I ^ ^ ■ ft ,I • li' ' *w 4*1 by-y:- ^■wmm r D 44 77 h’ ■ ..V ^ • j November 9, 1993 Mr. Lyle Oman Building Official City of Orono 2750 Kelley' Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Dear Lyle: Please attach this letter to my application for a building permit ^ storage shed at rav residence. As v^c discussed on the tclephofic. the builder I hued did not obuin a building permit and rebuilt the storage shed on the foundation of n.y former storage shed. There to b«n a largtr sirocture m this location for an cMlmatcd fort)- plus years and ob»i.«sly we would like to keep the smaller improsTd smicture. 1 have had disc arid lower tok rrerblenis for oser ten years and the hauling between the house and lakeshore can be very debihtalmg for me. This shed is smaller and safer than the old stnicture w hich was a safely hazard and an ^nr^tire nuisance for our chiUren and other kkls in the neighborhood. They played in and on to old siruemre which was jusi wailing lor an accident. With to irafTic day and night on to abutting public easement we also need this storage shed to secure our possessions. Our neighbors have been «ry pleased wilh to new smicture as evideoce by toir enclosed letters. Ruihie and 1 warn to do whatever we can to work within your system lo k^ 70*0 in its existing location on to old foundation. Please call me at work at 370-70.0 or at lu me at 471-8220 if I can be of .my additional assistance. Simrcrely yours, Pat and Ruthic Wolfe *' 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata. NfN 55391 r ML - I 7/ • — # Hoveiafc«r 1993 City Of orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MM SS323 Attn: Orono City Council 6 Orono Planning Comaission RE: The Patric Wolfe Residence 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata, Mli 55391 To Hhoia It May Concern: It is our understanding, sone questions have cone up regarding Mr. Wolfe's storage shed. We live next to the Wolfe's at 2879 Casco Point Road and are pleased to see the improvement. The improved shed, now in place, looks great and appears smaller than the previous shed. This structure is definitely an improvement in regards to safety. The last structure was old and appeared structurally unsound. We welcome the improvement and have no problem with it as it is. Yours truly. r // i / Noveaiber 9, 1993 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 To Whom This Concerns: I am writing this letter to you in regards to an Improvement my next door neighbor made to his property at 2871 Casco Point Road. The Wolfes rebuilt a lakeside shed which replaced a deteriorating shed that was an eyesore and a hazard. The roof was rotting and sagged and the door wouldn t shut. Electrically it was unsafe. The new shed is less obtrusive and seems to be smaller in size. This is a pleasing improvement from my viewpoint as a neighbor. Sincerely, ‘ J Rosemary cj Iversen 2835 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 f-' h\]\\ M'l 5? ti 4 4 « -i-l j: c ?m i 0» •I c; o < •! (K fi » J «s '• t s V ■ 2 It :i fv>i» q I T1m \ 2 S»*»njlrl “SS^5||!^!’ ji!:s-< j!j:i “a*'» s o • S'* ^:§J.**nnn §^:r •;? 2S 3r"s* 2|a?a, , 22:55;? sgiisS1-^8 sisisa? 8^ r* M• a .i i ;u’5°?-- ‘5 i?- 5 i ■■ i*s*5r? I ?:!=-•: •• .« ^ 1 •• "T • • n f* a 2r « » Js ir.:-«5c '’-'■o4r5 l?i jig s^s • d:I-U ^ I (/i o ;i ^ •% 0 n i I I 1 1' /\ l^ =vT TJ.— > =rs ? s ■= u> Oto* o: L© _ W ». _____k ! ^ z !5 g J? *« nf M rvjo Cl -I tP •0 (0M s §r Tlm u« I?; 5! 5 i £ •■' 4 .. • ' •4 . / RS* I f:iji?hi; "o="i!|. I. ■ S5:;M7»i? 2|-3*5*??*mhiH; -*5* 5aJ0it Sn 22 vhiiai o So •* f* j _ »* ” im 5*^'4a _.„So-. s ii~.3~ "S 0t-®u2o? * •♦ • •s*5r5ir »• 5-5!S• c ^ •11) «< » a? c5 > , • .. ^ i» - - ^ ~ . .♦•SjSSRfcHi • ■• . • :; o • •* o • SI r* - M iiiZum Nsj'Srjfi iiillHVt «4‘"Sn '« • 'jjlsi •: s»V r ',il *o2-S M »% • t ^ r. -o ' \U^l -r83? • • < o Z ‘4 •sJ=?sr,a= “ tt*2**l"f*5 2 5**F “t5*i s *oS®^“***^ B® ? 2 • «^ a •«. •-'!ii>sii.' i:Uii=;s 2S!'‘SC Jjssi-s 5e| ilhz •-a.33 lif^i ?!’-:!!? Sfs :ii.;i:5 *• ^*• •» mmMrn -:v^V5 ‘v J 'fiW ' • V 1 \ I. ■ • fe \m mmm’)HI >•■ '"H MW |» • ';:•’•■•• V VI ■^;mm *1 •. \i . V . u..--. ■•. • i'*v / r 'f-J >» .•’AiAt m Vv Ir " T“'|-! . -»!• , ! 'i |filj-:r^v'4 irt-: »• •rv . >yi '•iV •if' ^.«/ H I !>< f m • o -• o ■« e 4-7 V ' i, ‘4 ^ t *»»•»«• ••. ■. i» <«3 .t !• » 1 . t . * , , , '* »- • I o •. • •■ • - C t. * ■ * « . 1 •» • •• ' ' .k H n « ^ ^ fj -V , • ■ r> I • U o 5 a - ^ ® 5 " H ^ HI P 4 <1 ft * •« ^ % 4ft • ;f '•a : ■’: i i \1\ r •>- r ..i- of Sunroy > “ -• V -• •:TI EMMKH • V* /'' ■ • ’ • /■'' /', • ■ ■V .<., > cj*. . ./j ■/ * *> / / /V " >/ < ‘ . ' /. ✓ _ y - - ,-j.r*~- rr ./ X. V-/ ''/*• <o'' / ✓ 'v / « /• r'' : / > t t .V *• 9 f 1 L *n,. ^ •• • ‘Cortlfloat* of Surveyi »• .*V*— — *.T \ • — .-C » • ^• .. ... .• / a aurrar ^;; V V ->^ - VI.fmm •*• /rj'.’.s' . 9 • OF r .//f^ 5-'S<'^^ «£> J-ls^^Sl-' ^ so ^ 10 !< 3 tl (P ^ X S.'^ -—- ® iwx _...r i- 5 -S sy, y (P y,/'Zx>,y _ Sc(f fcrt. © Osr^'/'By - ^- J 0 ' ® o ® 2l y 11 ~ t.____lu “i ■*.. (S> .a- r7 ■"...... g7 (n) 2t y/o-f __llo © Y2x// -f 2-. 2Zl @ /!T>^7C.HHO @ 72 . ..........2-S2- . ... (7p HZ .H20 ............... @ ..................___no ^ So >^/l •; 2-/yr - (!p "/./ . .....ri . yc^Vtir ICo 4^ajJ)ccaOC e^A€F>rO' ^ ^^/ZO %o LfO'i 2? ^^ • • • ■ ''K-. lt,0 -707 -T /707r '707?' 7- ZBi'^ll = 2AAH ‘A 0 # ^ /V,b /0>^/^ - 7/^r*7 r 2ST,'iC> /o '>/ .''''w'r'';k'¥'‘Vi-■■ >.: f' ■ - -^ .r i''=l^iHlli /?>,iC--SPW^;- MM • ■ *•' . V , > ^ . ^ i-fv. . • Wrt H i«l *: %* r '^. . \ ^ %n »►- ■,•?!*■■ • <- ■ ■ -r -7. ■•* 'V » V ‘X'vO jwvw-. „/.. f.> •r..>*. ' ^ 4. ^ Vv r>' ^.* ‘o V :^.= s- vy«<, - 'rtS'-'-'' ■ m-w^i mm M.. '•'‘’ ■•V • , ■ U.JX- ^ ; t. v*-* i->J 5;: , . 'v^, .'''.' • ■■' •':/ •■ •'; v^. V; ■ ■ ■•• ■ rimyt 1 ,‘•*i<. ■ »■•'■-•>■ 1^ ^,-'A;V •-■■■' '.^^wSlv. . -tCV'j ' '* >. L.^• ■ .>1 Mm . r *• •>: * X 'I*» *! »• • ' • * J. ;.,’"'-?rv'>-’;’.' ^ f*- .. ; ^ ^ K •^•'i/Okvr*'. .1 . r • « •■•‘M':4:f:' • -^^>^•-*•• ■■.: ■-•>1 •♦W W* ‘ l'> i‘- J *• ^ # * ' ‘ :'■' ■•" ■ Vs X^-' ■' V ’ * .*• f •* A* X. /' * '* * C > ■•, - ■ ■..Z.v,..- ‘■4. I#!;-?- ^ ;ill \ ;.. 'r:St^lmm iPCfM . s,,-;iij }} \r y > >7?'Ay ■-■''*2^'>':r n >f I* » ‘ >: • W \' vA-. V; '. ‘ IT * * ‘ - »■ •' ■■■ fWl-; ■'1 mi- y- ■ ,t ■ .**.f^K' 9-M ‘•-S6X h .*. t fs -I :if« Xm &•,■'•'■•• ■•■•Vi ■3^ S8J' •> .k.s !•.• AV '. .s ■. *••« * ^f|! #|3|^ mill -K------- K-- \ ^o V 1 .?• ViC# ^ \ / -Jl- 4P.00 —'--------------------? W 62 ’5420'W 1- ri -■;^V ■■•.;.• ^■.^Lvv / ,«*«'V r . • • ( \0 X t>ect^j!^ _ V «. I '’ 'X' C." 0 V 9 5 -»? ifr^ \ TO ' 35 0 vJY’ ■" O X .0, 1 i58 7.V /— 3\rL. n.o - I )IrT^rs t:.5mm?:>[- cS I I I \ CV_AVEN'JF 5 /Xf , --7^v L/ /\ KIOOO- / 7 q ^o o*' f-^ /\ h / K ( / A I \ y \ [N •!■,\ l'l‘ $ / / _-X- . — Y - ------- - ------H 70*15 6 02 ^.....,,7:... ,,®p(, ., i'/ -s' '4 -l_. lake MINNETONKA \ ^-2*^'^ tK v ^t U a ">'2^ r r •s > iZ CMKn cmroFOwowo INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. C*uf0‘*» address OWNER _ coM*n.nn> COWTR TELEPHONE NO. DESCfUPTION 01 rCXDTHMG 02fPIAMHR^ ojiNSuu^Tim 0i\MLL wo or DiMO-im C7 U€M0—F0iiAJL OOFLUM&HOn 10 ^UiyiSiHQ riKA!. 11 %l€ CH AN*CA4. » 11 MfCHARUCAi^lHM. 7A^ 12 13MfTlHSrr.'TU«!liON ^4 SCWfPHOOl^ U^ 27 MAiNT ^5 5€mC»NSTACL 23 SC^’tlC f IHAL 10 mu T| t»CAV‘O^AD»lOG'I^H.l»^ If LARlSHO^t'WfTLANOf Afl40Ac I iRtSnCTlON pmGMss 21 COWJ^T 22^0U0I4MJ^ o««tiw:oi*nucTow to «*f rr tow- — tm — »«o COMMENTS ort0^ 5 i •u 3 I WORK SATiSFACTOPf PROCEED rOPPECT ¥VO«K A PPOCIID 3 COPRECTWOPK CALL FOR RtlNS»^£CTlON BEFORE COVEHiNO ::: correct unsafe condition within -------- hours INSPECTOR WILL RETURN : project COMPLCTt r ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF occupancy ________""EMPCRARY ___permanent y(STOP ORDER POSTED CALL INSPECTOR fZ INSPECTION REOLMRED CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS r PHOTO taken ~ C’TATION ISSUED Call for the next inspection 24 hours In advance.473-7357 Owner/Contractor inspector.__TSf ite:tJ Oa^ tttut* Coptinip^ciort ni*CMwry Copirsn* Motie* r ClTYoT ORONO Mimktpal Offices Sfi^et 2750 Pr«»»y \n ?5356 MadMI Mirtss P 0 Id 66 DyiUi |„. m 55323^ August 12. 1993 Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wavzata. MN 55j 91 RE: Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe: I th^^mln Pf dug JipTTg a^ :^7l Casco Point Road^^ that a storage shed has been built or placed on hardcover within 75 of the lake. ^ f tH, ririr miict reouirc vou to filc a peniiit application and move the shed to an Therefore, the Cit> must ^ r.rvrr\ hv August 30 1993 If this deadline is notsrrr":.rT.;.,''srK?.^^ -.« meeting this deadline, please feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely. C^Cj^ (iLvvvt^ Lyle Oman Building Official LO/!sv cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth. BuilJing and Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 47W)510 r >r \\CITYofORONO Mmitcipal Offkci 'Sn*t mitui 2750 mn OroM. m 5UH HaSftt W(trtn. P 0 lot SS CmtH »*». 55323^6 November 3, 1993 Mr. Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Poim Road Wavzau. Minnesota 55391 Re; Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe: On Augusi i:. 1993 this omce re™.‘Ii/^niesolved. Again your shed placed on your „ for a building permit to place the shedrror;" « ^^rule'^ityr. “^rcirt^^S'rmTril^o'’" 'urdter legal action. If you have any questions, feel free to conuct me at my office. Sincerely, Di iQ Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Admimsiratoi Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 r CITYofORONO Muttkipal l>mct5 SUUt AMrtss: Orvw 5535« PO Boi 6tt Crystat Bay. IfN &S323 OOM Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzaia, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Wolfe; The Citv is in receipt of the Property Owners List and Plat Map as part of the required information needed to complete your after-the-fact variance application. As I noted earlier in a phone message, your application is incomplete as we have never received a survey lixating all improvements and the subject boathouse on the survey. An earlier survey by Otto X Associates shows onlv residence structure and garage. No other improvements arc recorded. If vour application is to be complete, the City must have a survey locating all including the boathouse siructure and a hardcover inventor ’ as stated and shown in the hands it information (enclosed is another application form that includes handout i^omation). Ihc boathouse is considered a non-conlorming structure as it is located withm the 0-75 setbaJ^ All non-conforming structures require approval of the City before stnicmral repairs can be made. The deadline date for sulmittals for the February 22nd meeting (Tu^y) if Hopefully vour surveyor will have completed the updated survey by the deadline. If no deadline'for the March 21st meeting of the Planmng Commission would be February .5ih. The Citv must be in receipt of a complete application by the March meeting ^ Commission. As we arc dealing with an after-the-fact application, this matter must bv resolved as sooi as possible. Please contact my office if you have any questions pertaining to the directives noted above or if you will have difficulty^ meeting the deadline of March meeting. Sincerely, ' Jeanne A. Mabusih Building &. Zoning Administrator JAM/lsv Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 r o. o CITYof ORONO Nfimkipal OfTicrs Street Mirts& rrw wkf t»n*2f 0«ww. Vf< 5535S f 0 Bci Cf*st»l Bl». MS 55323 0066 Mav 4. 1994 Mr. Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wavzata. Minnesota 55391 Re: Zoning Application #1895 Dear Mr. Wolfe: I have completed a preliminary review of viHir after-the-fact application for variances to construct an accessory structure (IO’x 12’ shed) on your property. The certificate of survey by Otto Associates which you provided contains a wealth of information which leads me to make the following comments: The survey is extremely misleading, showing a dark line boundary that does iK)t match the legal boundary of your propeny. No addendum was provided by you or your surveyor to c.xplain the format of this survey. The shed is clearly not within your property ’ boundaries, but within the right-of- way of Carman Avenue. Tne survey suggests a "proposed" change to your legal description which would place the shed approximately 4’ within your property. However, you have not applied for a vacation of a portion ot Carman Avenue, and it you did so, the City would undoubtedly deny such a vacation given the DNR s consistent opposition to such proposals which reduce public access to lakes, and given the City ’s use of the right-of-way as a public beach area. A site inspection reveals that the shed is approximately 8’ from the normal shoreline (not 12’-14’ as survey shows), and obviously within 75’ of the lake where no structures or hardcover are allowed. Your surveyor did not identify the 929.4’ elevation contour which is required by the City for all surveys abutting Lake Minnetonka. The survey shows and site inspection verifies that your recent landscaping has encroached onto the 60 ’ City right-of-way by as much as 20 ’. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 J Mr. Patrick Wolfe May 4, 1994 Page 2 • The fact that you had a boat house in the same location for many decades has little bearing on the Citj ’s consideration of such structures. City codes are designed to eliminate such structures within nehts-of-wav or near the lakcshore as they deterwratc. Once the building was reiiKJved, it lost any "iKm-conlorming structure’ status it may have had. • Further, the fact that you used an existing ’foundation’ (in this case a deteriorating slab) has little bearing, since per Section 10.55. Subdivision 26 (E), "If any non-conforming use is destrosed by any means including floods to an extent of 50% or more of its assessed value, it shall not be reconstructed c.xccpt in conformity with the provisions of this section". Removal of the old shed constituted a removal of more than 50% of its assessed value. All of the above leads City staff to conclude that you have not made and cannot make a legitimate variance application for this structure. A variance will ikm be granted for construction of an accessory building on the City right-of-way. The offending structure must be removed immediately. The portion of your $175.00 application fee not used in legal notice publication will be returned. 1 suggest you relocate the structure to a conforming site on the lot. Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth ind I would be happy to meet with you to discuss any of the points in this letter and a possible location on your property that would meet code requirements for the shed. Please contact me or Jeanne as sotvn as possible at 473-7357 to arrange a meeting. Asst. Planning & Zoning Adminisimtor MPG/ch Enc. Sections 10.55, Subd. 26; 10.03. Subd. 5 cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building &. Zxining Adm, Lyle Oman, Building Official Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director ^ • 2^ /; o \ \ . ON' >* .\ y ^ 55323 006S Mr. Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata. Mirjwsota 55391 Re; Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe; Pursuant to our discussion of May 31.1 understand you will not be providing the City with a revised survev showing your new storage shed as being within your propeny boundaries. Consequently, your after-the-fact variance application has not been scheduled tor the June FManmng Commission meeting. You indicate it is now vour position that the storage shed is actually an ice fishing house which vou intend to move out onto the ice each winter and store temporarily on the shore in the summer. I aovised you I would resiew the City codes regarding the status ot Tish houses . As a "shed", your building is considered as a permanent structure; as a "fish house . it is considered as a lemporar^ structure. Both permanent and temporary structures arc dealt with similarlv in Section 10.55. Subd. S and Section 10 22, Subd. 2. ^exjempoiarv^ n.rm,.nent .structures are nllowed within 15' of aveia^e_ietM>LK line Neither vou nor anv other resident are allowed to store a "fish house in the lakeshore y^d not meeting the setback requirements. A temporary structure is considered hardcover, is an encroachment, and is regulated the same as a permanent structure. Your comment that manv property^ owners on Casco Point have fish houses stored ne.xt to the lake has no bearing on vour individual situation. Furthermore, our shoreline inspection tour o the Casco Point. West Arm. Forest Lake. North Arm and Carman’s Bay areas on June .nd found no more than five 'fish houses" on approximately 14 miles ot shoreline They simply are not being stored on the shoreline at the vast majority ot lakeshore residences. The City ’s position on your building has not changed and will not ch.inge no matter w^hat you call it Funlier. the Cirv has no survey that shows this building is located or stored within your property boundaries. Absent such a survey, your after-the-fact variance request cannot proceed Ttlephone (612) 473-7357 • F.AX 473-0510 r removal of the offendmg building ^ f nrA^r that this matter be resohed In a timely manner, >ou are hereby adris^Therefore, m order that to submit the * * . manning Commission melting. If no such survey Is -c... aCU... .0 „,uire r.«ovn, of .he Structure. Sincerely, Michael P. Gat Iron Asst. Planning & Zoning Admimstraior MPG/ch Hnc. Sections 10.22. Subd. 2 and 10.55, Subd. S cc:Bruce L. Vang. Field Inspector Lvle Oman. Building Olticial Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Adm. Ronald J. MfX)rse. City .‘Xdminisiraioi City Attorney t I y i.0.«1 Subd. 5. Area, Reiqht. Lot Width and Yard :^,e.n'irecents. A. Height. No structure or buildir T . 1 exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height exceft a-i rrcvided Secticn 10.75. be observed: B. Lots. The following ninim;ia requirejnen*:s shall Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Side Yari Adjacent to Street rxcn'^ Yard i/2 acre 100 feet 30 feet i.0 feet 15 feet JOieet EEC. 10.22. REGOI..XTIONS FOR ' 'iv^Vv-TiV • !.K- IB •fB 1C- AND -IR-^C-T- LAKESHORK RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.•LR-IC AND^ LR 1C - r « _ 13 - -lR-1C " , or " LR-1C-I " Cne t:L,;c're H^raential Oi,%ric-. th. fcl levin, r„ul.iion. shall apply: Subd. 1. lak.shcre Se_; Back Reculationa. T.le setback frora the shoreline for lakeshore lots; A. Shall he 75 feet for all structures except r,f< 'akt-shc^e lots divldcd by a najor thoroughfare, a lock box not •'n*^xcess of 20 square feet in area and 48 inches in height is SHcwd la.:eahc\. foction of t.t. lot and requera. a tuildxn, pernit from the City. E. No principal or accessory structure shall h*. located within 75 feet of the lakoshore nor closer to the lakishore than the average d'-stance frern the residence buiidinos on adjacent lots (refer to Orono Manual ot Design Standards and Specifications) except that this does no | o structure allowed in subsection A above. /app^y Subd. 2. Lakeshore Hardcover and Land Alteration Reoul i.ions. Within 75 feet of slruc^uexiovating, fiiiino, hardcover, temcrary or F«r^nent ^xcect as rermitted under Subdivision 1 of this sect..cn. to 2 50 feet of the shoreline there shall be no he-e . j - ws*-hin *>50 fe'^t to 500 feet of the shoreline the-e ahilrbr^o crelterlhan 30% hardcover. Within 500 feet to 1,000 of thi shoreline there shall be no greater t.'.an 35. hardcover. T ORONO CC 283 (4-1-84) r $ 10.55 including the lu other provisions of this Areas, shall *“* ‘i’ j;-t, JJ:cut between other provisions of this Chapter. o* this Section, the »ost restrictiveChapter and provisions or 'Vision shall prevail. _ Flood Protection Elevation. The Subd. 7. ^®"^'^3^^n riIvation shall be an elevation no Regulatory Flood elevation of the regional flood plus i^rincreasTs* 1^/100^ elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain. cross-sections shall be interpolated. 3. Lake .'Minnetonka shall be 9 3 2.. -Si-. -he regulatory flood protection elevation for 1 ' h#i 9 3 2.5 MSL. C. The regulatory -,Utted*hrrusll? 1^3 nii3::?i3^Vrss!ri =eii=,Vni?r procedures set forth herein. — -----——————la n • hereinafter specitically ot oeraanent structures, excavation, ^wel’ or other construction shall be— tractions, septic systems, ® ‘ Conservation Area; nor owed within t.he - ^h*f»reo£• nor on any land within 5 feetanv lands within .o .eet thereof, . • Y j^^reline, nor on o. the ordinary if such activity land abutting, is incompatible with the policies upon those ad.acen. ar preservation of those :3“s?rv3uon^3re'a3‘?n ^heir natural st^ obs al on of Subd. 9. rloodway ^ aobsm'^’'ucf lood^^lows. have a low flood damage ?°tentia* and do ^ ^ District to the ?Lse uses shall be P^^mitteo witnin^ City Codeextent that they are not orohb.td^^y^ are received provision ana Cod- provisions or «^equlation of as may be required by other Cit/ :-f.;«n including without other qovernmental agencies -L ^ c Natural Hesources, the fimit^tion, the Minnesota Department Minnetonka «-""^"'ltcn'D7^rL “*”ln* add^\“V,- no 3se shall adversely affectConse.’*vation District. ORONU CC 365 (4-1-34) 1 r S 10.5S «;u^d 26. Non-con for "1 in:i Us#s. A jtructurc or th« use of A structure or premises which was lawful before the passage or ^ of Section bat which is not in ccnfomity with t ^""ision. or\hi» S,cr>on nay be continued subject to tbc following conditions: No such use shall be expandei. changed, enlarged or altered In a way which Increases its non-conforuity. -i. • f<ct ► f B. No Structural alteration or addition to any non- « -1 ir# over the life of the scructure shall exceed -0 S-rcent^of its value at the time of its becoming a ^in’ess the '"ructure is permanently changed to a conforming use'or‘unless the alteration or addition would substantially reduce potential flood damages for the entire structure. Subparagraph E of this Section. E If any non-conformi‘g use is destroyed by any „,3n„ ^includin, ei-as « ‘^extent of SO P««nb^^ ritrtbc ;-v!siin%%^^\\rs\,^c-aon -y U3ue^a conditional use permit . recon .^-,ong..r„ction, is adequately outside the flood-ay and, with flood proofed, elevated or otherwise protected this Secti-»n. ,, M..»- «r -»i'.inr-s thereof which are or become nuisances shall* be entitled to'continue as non-conforming uses. ’J. Exc®Dt as provided in Subparagraph use Wb3ch has beenTe-\c\e5 as a conditional use shall not be considered as a non-conforming use. H. Non-coaforming uses wUh^'the d% ^coiL?n%;\^”‘th\^l 3e°c\ ^ ^%lTnVt lre‘T"n.u''aUo'n o"n“«tablish.ent of competing businesses ORONO CC 375 (4-1-84) K •• 1 1 ^ U ^ i ot\ o ^ A ro.V.n«\uina^*-rth;^ y' under this Section. L- ■"• « "ho flood plain desi^ination on Subd. ^ ^ / te removed frora flood plain the official »^P» " w ® jes idnation is in error and that unless it can be s^wn the regional flood and U the area is ide *he flood plain. Special exceptions to contiguous to lands Natural Resources this rule may be other measures, lands are adequatelyif he determines that, through other m^^^^ SectionESS s;sr.sr. . •; ssK-ES “ou;.% •“"”‘" ""°'by th« Federal Insurance Adnnts.ration. Subd. 28. interpretation. ld°to'*be application, the ? t,e’ liberally construed In favor of minimum requirements or rep.-al of any the City and shall l**”statutes' The boundarie. of the other powers granted J . . w- determined by scaling distances Flood Plain Districts shall be i, Leded as to the exact the official maps. where i--* ‘ district as shewn on the official location of the boundaries °i y" ^ jj., to be a conflict between a oaps, as “/'ua- ffeld conditions, the City ="<1^"**^ naoped boundary and "nation based cn elevaticns on the shall make the necessary , 7v^e person contesting the ’-ecional (100-year) elood profil * * . aiven a reasonable location of the ^City and to submit technical opportunity to present his case .o ^ne ui / cv^idcncc if so desires* subd. 29. Abrogation not intended by this Section to covenants or deed existing ordinance, this Section imposes greater restrictions. ^*2^'n«t of this Section shall prevail,restrictions, the provisions of tnis subd. 30. Warning and Aood'plaiWistricts section does not i^P®t^Lch districts will be free from or land uses permitted w.t c-,c.<on shall not create liability flooding or flood damages. Th emplovee thereof for any on the part of the °ce on this Section or anyflood damages ‘hat Pfult from rol administrative decision law.uiiv Source: Ordinance No.^213 Effective Date: 1-11-'^ A ORONO CC 376 (4-1-84) r i'. TO:Cluir Siihroebcr and Orooo Plarmii^ Oxnmhskm Mcrobcrk Rem Moorsc. City AdminhtTJtor rRtBI:Mklael P. Gaffhm. Assl. (*Umtng & Zoning Adminisiraior DATE:Oc^o^er 10, I9Q4 Sl'BJKtT: #1959 James Oglarsl. 3345 Cnsul Bay Road - Variance - Coot inuatKm Public Heanng Li^ of Exhibits A - Lciier fnmi Appiicam B - Staff Sketch C - N«Micc of Ptannii^ Comirission Action 9 22/94 D Planning: Commission Miraitcs 9/19/94 E - Memo and Exhibits of 9/13/94 Discuvsiun Applicant has discussed his rcasonabte options, with stall and has concluded that the slwd can be relocated within the property IxHindarics. thereby eliminating the enen^'hments onu> Hillside Place right-of-way and Dakou Rail right-of-way. He is requesting that the shed be allowed up u> but m*t over the side and rear lot lirars. in etfcct a "zero setback". This will allow a large tree between the shed and the house to be preserved, and will leave a 10’ scibKk between the htnise and the shed. The applicant’s proposal appears to be a viable solution to the cncro.n;hnienl problems Ihe variances necessary to approve the shed in this location include. 1. Rear yard setback variance of 5’ (5’ required). Side yard setback variance of 10’ (10’ required). 3.Lot coverage variance (lot coverage including shed is 1.085 s.f. or 19.1%; 15% or 1.500 s f. allowed). Hardcover in 75-250 ’ zone of approximately 50% (25% allowed) Staff Recommcndalio' If Planning Commission rveommends approval of the variances required tor this sh^ location, staff r«ommends that the applicant provide a complete hardcover mventory for the property prior to Council review. r Zoning FLlc #1959 Octobcf 10, 19W Page: Options ft*e ActloQ 1 Recommend ^Jproval of vamtsxs for *e revised shed location, and direct applkani to submit complete hardem^ information for the property pnor to Council review Rect>mmcnd ihai the variances be denied and the shed removed. Table for additksul infonnation. Other ch r September 29, 1994 TO:Michael Gaffron, Assistant Planning and Zoning A(teinistrator, City of Orono SUBJECT:Variance, zero side and rear set back, storage shed, 3345 Crystal Bay Road. Dear Michael, Following our meeting and discussion on September 26, 1994, it does see® that the best sol^’tion at this time would be to request a zero lot line variance and reposition the shed entire ly within the boundries of the property. With a zero variance this could bo accomplished by shifting the shed approximately five feet forward and five feet in. This would avoid the need to cut down any major tiees and would eliminate the need for fill because of the rapid grade drop. The additonal storage that this shed provides is essential and very much needed. While the location is not ideal, it is workable. Thank you for your consideration. Tour assistance on this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, 3345 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 ^eCSivED SEP 3 0 1994 CITY OF ORONO Vue?'. V. r-i /. UXI5T.io:-* /^. o m //xZ VM 3ur ington ■.A^.n4 S9" h ' - - R:2292.0I - ■/' ' L^^c7.o / ^ z>^/26€ iXjorthern ^h£c( ^a\ r CITY OF ORONO P.O. Boi 66 Crrstal Bay. MN 55323 473-7357 TO: James W. Ogtand 3345 Cnstal Bay Road Wavraia*. MN 55391 ZONING FILE #1959 NOTICE OF PlJCNTsTSG CO^D^55ION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 22. 1994 TITE OK APPLICATION: Variance VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGACSSTDATE OF MEETING: 09 19 94 Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted bclow^: Applicant to explore options. Planning Commission noted that while the shed is not an evesore and sems to Tit* in its current location, they arc not comfortable with allowing it to stay on Dakou Rail property and somewhat concerned about it staying on Hillside Place right-of-way. Applicant is scheduled to meet with staff to discuss this further on Monday. September 26 at 11:00 a m. at the City offices. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planmng Commission. Monday. October 17. 1994; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. r I / MlNb I bb Ul- i Ht UKUiSO MEETING I lELD ON SEPTTNtnER 19. 1994 (#6) licm #1953 - Alien - Continued It ha b«n dctenwntd ftom jjxaling with th* MnunJ Fite Dept tha the fire afety ind emergency access issues were not a factor The concern now is one of aesthetics Peterson and Smith voiced concern over the area bcii>g highly developed and the small lot siK which makes adding mote structure difficult Nolan was concerned with drainagfi. Allen stated he wants to remove the wcH pit and replace a portion of the foundatioa Nolan asked that the applicant paint the bouse which Allen stated was his mtcnL The hardship statement refers to the problem of space The addition is tor " extension of the kitchen, and addition of a dining room Peterson and Smith feU a 12x14 addition would be more reasonable given the limited space and eUmmation of the deck would decrease the impact of additional house structure. Council saw no problem wuh a door stoop and steps as requested by Mr Allen Nolan moved. Smith seconded, to approve Item #1953 for replacement of rear structure and amended addition swe to 12‘,xl4‘. with steps and stoop Applicant agreed to eliminate the deck. Approval subject to satisfactory drainage plan submitted to Cit>*. and proper icmoval of wen if found defective Ayes 4. Nays 0 l#7l riTM -1 Ol) OBI RIIADSER, 2405 DIJNWOODY, 3865/3877 SIIO^E DRIVE - SUBDIVISION OF A RI Pl AT OF THREE LOTS INTO TWO LOTS - CONI INUAllON OF PUBLIC HEARING The Affidavit of Pu!)lication and Certificate of Mailing were noted, Gaffion noted the appUcam has requesteO tabling in order to add a hardcover vanance to his request. I, W»5 moved by seconded by SnuA, .0 table Item «958 to the October 17, 1994 meeting of the Planning Commission. Ayes 4. Nays 0. (#8) ITEM #1959 JAMES W. OGIAND, 3345 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - AFl ER- THErFACT VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARlNCi The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing vvere noted Mr. Ogland was present IJ r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CX)N!KDSSlON MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 19. 1994 (18) Item #1959 - Ogland - ComiouGi Gailrcm staled this is an ailer-the-fact \^nancc wtere a shed is Iccated over the lot line, extending into the right-of-way of lEllside Place, and is partially on the Dakota Rail property. This stnicture requires a 5* rear yard and 10* side yard setback. The lot coverage including the shed is 19 1T» e.xceeding the 15V* limit l^ocating the structure in any street is not allowed, and the hardcover limitation is e.xceeded There is also a sewer line which runs through where the shed is located GaiTion stat'*.d a hold harmless agrecm«a wmiid be needed if the shed was allowed to stay on the City right-of-w ay as we!) as an easen^nt from Dakota Rail. Ant‘ cr option would be to place the shed within the property lines Peterson corauKntcd on the neat upkeep of said shai and property. He noted other sheds similarly located along tire area but questioned whether Planning Commission could act on thi.s afTidavit with the shed sitting on Dakota Rail property Ogland voiced the problem with space limitation in a lot of this size stressing the need for the shed He also said the shed is on skids and can be easily moved The public road issue was discussed Possible tliture repair of sewer lin . was detennined not to be a problem. The road is being maintained as lawn here and elsewhere Mayor Callahan commented on the probable difiiculiy with obtaining a Dakota Rail variance. Peterson moved, Berg seconded, to table Item #1959 allowing appLIcani to present another option for shed location Ayes 4, Nays 0 (#9) ITEM #1960 - 1 OR JONSEN/NAVARRE CO’itJREGATlON OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, 365* TOGO ROAD - VARIANCE - PI LIC n£.\RLNG The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailii g were noted The applicant was present. ---—J r - » To:Chaimun Schrookr and Orono Planning Commhskm Members Ron Moorsc, City i^iministraior Fr«»in:Nitchael P. GafTron. Assistant Planning & Zoning Adminislralor Date:September 13, 1994 Subject:#1959 James W. Ogland, 3345 Crystal Bay Road - Alter-the-Fact Variance Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC, Single Family Lakesbore Residential Application:Attcr-thc-fact request to allow an existing storage shed to remain located panially wiihin a public right-of-way and not meeting the required side or real property line setbacks. list of Exhibits A :b c D E F G II I Application Plat Map Property Owners’ last Ncighboi Ackmiwledgements Ijetter of Request Photos Survey Miscellaneous Correspondence Slaif Hardcover Calculations Pertinent Code Sections and Requested Variances Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (E & F) - Accessory structures require a 5 ’ rear yard and 10’ side yard setback from the property line. (Shed straddles lot lines.) Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - l.ot coverage by structures limited to 15% or 1,500 s f. including only house and garage. (Existing lot • overage including shed is 1.085 s.f. or 19.1%.) Section 6.07, Subd. 4 - Locating or maintaining a struefure in any^ street is not allowed (The ferm street is synonymous with the term public road as dctined in Section 6.01, Subd. I (L)l. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -5c Section 10.56 Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover limitations. (75-250 ’ zone in which shed is located is at approximately 50% hardcover.) r Zoning File #1959 September 13, 1994 Page 2 Background Applicant constructed a 100 s.f. shed in 1991. noted by the Inspections Department in 1992. The shed is located partially within applicant ’s property, partially within the right-ot-way of Hillside Place, and partially on the Dakota Rail property (see survey). Hillside Place is a public right-of-way dedicated in the plat of Wallace’s Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, aril in which the City maintains a sewer lateral serving portions of the neighborhtxxl to the south. The Hillside Place right-of-way is not open to public travel, and has been maintained to be perceived as a lawn by Mr. Ogland and his neighlnx to the east. In the fall of 1993, Mr. Ogland and his neighbor Mr. Stoyke applied for a vacation of Hillside Place and after review by the Planning Commission withdrew the application since it seemed the DNR was strongly opposed to such vacation. Mr. Ogland is now requesting a variance for the location of The shed, preferring to leave it in its current location rather than place it within the propeny boundaries. PleJi^ eview tlte exhibits, especially Mr. Ogland s letter of request and the survej. Also note the following: 1 he Public Works Department would as a minimum require that the property owner execute a Hold Harmless Agreement if the structure is allowed to remain on the right-of-way. There is. of course, a remote chance the City would have to excavate in Hillside Place to repair or maintain sewer line, and the City would certainly retain the rieht to move or have the owner move the shed if it was in the way. The City has no authority to grant Mr. Ogland approval to keep his shed on the Dakota Rail properly. If the shed is allowed in its current location, the City should condition such approval on the applicant obtaining an easement or as a minimum, written permission tVom Dakota Rail for such encroachment into their property. Attributing the entire footprint of the shed towards lot coverage for applicant ’s property, the shed constitutes an e.xcess in lot coverage. While the allowed lot coverace is 15^c (or 1,500 s.f. including only house and garage), applicant ’s lot coverage with the shed is 1,085 s.f. or 19.1%. A variance is required for lot coverage. Hardcover was not calculated by the applicant but appears to be in the 30% range in the 0-75 ’ zone and around 50% in the 75-250 ’ zone including the entire area of the shed. If the shed is ultimately approved, a thorough hardcover inventory' for the entire property should be required of the applicant. r Zoning FUc #1959 September 13, 1994 Page 3 Options for Action 1. 2. 5. Recommend approval of variances to allow ite shed to remain at its current location, conditioned on execution of a Hold Harmless Agreement by the applicant, submittal of an easement from Dakota Rail, and applicant to submit hardcover calculations. Recommend that the shed be moved to a different location and recommend approval of the necessary hardcover and setback variances. 3. Recommend that the variances be denied and the shed removed. Table for additional information. Other. J 1 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee 5200.00 ^550.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Property Identification Number (P.I.D.>-----fP - ' P ci'L l Att^h legal description to application if not o" required survey. Date Property’ Acquired--------r, ^ ------------------------ I (do)((^not])also own the adjacent p^cels C '■ • X , . • • 1 V »• r rv •' r fv*' ynwail V* L'»'w‘iTwf i A ^ Z ^ T' Z hT A WWVfc. V'VVW'V V-vV ■ / 4. V • % Present use of property: X residential Zoning District: APPLIC.ANT . Name Other (specify) Xmopi^t^yeaf^** w*^ww»' YiU Civi :<0i . V ‘S' •VW ' 4. Phone (borne) V7/~*yy^Z Phone (work) OWTVER (if different than applicant) Name _________g:----------------- Phone(horae) Phone (work)_ Address:Ciry:Zip: ..A (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear ___Lot Coverage Average Lakeshorc Other (specify) compliance with Zoning Code requirements.juArt/2oc^j. LttiOCi (attach additional sheets if necessary) r SUBMITTALS IT f the following infomiation must be submitted bv the applicationi deadliiie date in vour aopUcation to be considgrcd complete; Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County- Depanment of Finance. A-603, Govi Center. 348-3271). 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy SVS* x 11* for reproduction. _ Topographic surv ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade arc proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/^* x II" for reproduction. _ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy S'/i" x 11"). _ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property'. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). _ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. _ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant^ and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour vjinance applipq^iffn is not co^mplete jf the above information h.ns not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Admimstrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application. and~certifies that me information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. OWTVER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signamre___Jo^PiU^ U). Date (2i^U^:Lb Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at ail scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If tm applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 i ^ (II) • t 10) (I (li) V X'/d '•■V. MC ' /j (13) 'V,% Uj mit I • 9 lo^s #?. o. r. »•9. TO i fl o'^♦0 o^iAa's «rpiTi^i TO M ■:*0€T>»4 Wl>i ? ‘(10] XK)O'V iii msc. r 96D V i^^) <9^ (?S ») A I vV ijV»)^(77) , // -'' V ► ^ ^ ^ (60^V "g *0 g (74)(S9)• _ac_96 I7)V 16]y IS (57Kift;'•5. _ , i • ' (70) v« (3) _1ZLJJ (20 Cf (44)A'T/45 004) V •«•/A'*'" 8 3 («) IT C A_ ^ 40 A (75)7^' 105)'i'/a • (93) (69 26)/ i*<y » a 39 :(98 (66)1 .4^. Mst)^33 «>/. (69) > V (66), ■7^(64)/ s^|>- '*'/x FSa •f(63)/r^ XX <*t 74717 ^ ^A2>Y .X 30)/»/ j -\x..(95) (33)(91) J 8 (9?)S ^OCTICT *15 (16) >20 /. ClTlOT C ,/! (94) (6)(76) ✓ ‘Toa«*i'Cl ’;:i (107) miM --'I • • • I MCO) • •( •(101) iri u'-* s OuTlct i (30) V, ,]*• UN BATl 07/27/?*'««■/ BATCN 001- 5* »«f» AOOK (MCR NAME *4’ TAXPAYER nr NAHi/AOOS•'4"'SB 17-117-n 41 OOlf 05^7^ CHYSTAL MY tO D L HEIKB i J HOLTZ DIXIE LEE NEEX3 352Y ClYSTAL MY tfO HAYZATA MN 5SS4ISB 17-117-23 41 0022 03345 CtTSTAl. MY ftO JAMES N OCtANO JAMES M OGLAIO 5345 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55341Sa 17-117-23 41 0025 03354 CRYSTAL BAY RO B 6 GUMP I J L SECHRIST B 6 GUMP I J L SECHRIST 3354 CRYSTAL MY RO MAYZATA MN 55341 3B 17-117-23 44 0104 03240 NAVARRE LA CLAIR T A LYNN 0 ROOD CLAIR I LYf§4 ROOD 2215 KENNOOO HAY MAYZATA MN 55341 ICWEPIH COUNTY PROPERTY IHTWfUTION SYSTEM PROPERTY OMCRS LIST53 17-117-23 41 002003335 CRYSTAL BAY RO LARRY H r^lSON LARRY H NELSON 3335 CRYSTAL MY RO HAYZATA MN 5534133 17-117-23 41 002303344 CRYSTAL MY RO HARREN L PASCWE fURRLN L PASC^E 14441 VILLAGE NOOOS 04 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5534733 17-117-23 44 OOU03345 crystal BAY RO J R LOTRANO ETAL J R LO ERANO 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA PB4 55341 REP«T NO, PI43S401PACI33 17-117-23 41 002103334 CRYSTAL BAY RO PATRICK 0 0*FLANAGAN DONALD J STOYKE 3334 CRYSTAL MY RO HAYZATA MN 55341 *4,33 17-117-21 41 OOM03355 CRYSTAL MY BO JOHN E RUST JOm FUST5355 CRYSTAL BAY ROAOl HAYZATA MN 553U33 17-117-23 44 004400033 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C N PALMER A 3 J PALMER CHRIS I MRBARA PALMER 27X0 CASCO PT RO OMNO MN 55341 I * > J-. » H ; f •• J ; I * * > ;•Vii' T *'’f w*) 3*: }‘ I • ■ i’ |,'r..1 ‘1'■ * . U * Jr•> V •• TOTAL MTCH 001 OOOIOI } i n •*> * * < ? » 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE . REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECMOS OF THE KEFPIEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION? TO THE 3EST OF MY RHOKLCDGE AHQ BELIEF. DATE . < -jit- i j. •» ‘4 Lv.» • -'i •• •;? r.',' i. ■#-.i ■ ' V. ,»k: I i-’i'.' • ' , •• .‘-i: . 'rf5; • , .? '> i. *1 . " ? . f - J '■|u r» v'i I (we) W4 icr^ IH____ [print namc(s)] <s_> fjacent Propertj Owners’ Acknowledgement Form f’p^S.c\\ ktot 33H9 -dnysT'^ I [print address] B A ^ A o have revicwTd the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at f / .f?^ also referred to as Land Use Application No.-------------. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the propert>' or use but merely to confirm tor Council that I (we) am (arc) aware of the improvement plans and that the propose^ neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. -7- 3/- 9Y DateProperty Owner /<5- ------ Property Owner ^ .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................*.......................................*...................... I (we) [print namefs)] ^3^ (!e^:$rAC 6a^ a [print address] have reviewed the plans for th-*: proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at AtU also referred to as Land Use Application No.-------------• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (vve) am (arO not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to conhrm for the C ty Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the propose neig project or use requires Council approval. Date DateProperty Owner If you havo anv infoimaiion that may assist the City Drier Applicatl. please submit your comments to the BuUdinr & Zonmg Otl.ee at least 10 days pnor to the scheduled meeting date. O A O DATE CITY OF ORONO JIM OGLAND, Property o%mer STORAGE SHED, PERMIT, EASEMENT, ETC. 3345 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD Auqust 23, 1994 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Allow existing storage shed to part ially sit on "Hillside Place" (a twenty five foot wooded, unused fire access lane) sandwiched between two residential houses. Give consideration to granting permission, by means of a "permit or easement," to allow the shed to remain as is in its present location. BUILDING PERMIT: When this shed was built (1991) I contacted the City of Orono and was told that a Building Permit was not needed for an accessory building (shed) that was under 120 square feet. This storage shed is under 100 square feet. Instead of putting up a Menard/Knox type barn shed I decided on a shed that was more attractive and seemed to better fit the character of the house, etc. FIRELANE: This adjacent parcel was originally platted as an access for fire equipment to get to the lake. It has never been developed or used as such and has been maintained as yard by the adjacent property owners for over 80 years. In earlier discussions with Public Works Director John Gerhardson, (who was met with on site twice) has indicated no objection to vacating this parcel nor objections to an easement regarding the shed. The shed is mobile and could be moved at such time as might be needed to work on the sewer or if the railroad were to request it be removed from their right-of-way. HARDSHIP: The only possible location for a shed on the property is this corner of the lot. For many years there was an outhouse on this very spot. It was followed in the fifties by a storage area for fireplace wood and a fishhouse. The lot and house are small, and additional storage space is desperately needed to store lawn and garden equipment, bicycles, outboard motors, lake and dock equipment, tools, etc. The terrain is quite steep and as a result, there is a large rock retaining wall (three or four foot high) on this rear corner of the property. It is also the Northern boundary line for the Dakota Railroad track. ”1 ‘•'"A \W'.;i ^ continued Page 2 •# I# #...Ogland, shed There are fences and metal stakes that appear to define the property lines. My mother had a garden here for close to 50 years. As is often the case, a land survey done March 15, 1993, shows the real property lines, and of course the storage shed being not entirely within the lot description. My family has maintained the lane as if it were our own all these many years. In addition to the terrain and rock retaining wall, there are mature trees and shrubs that effectively dictate the location of the shed. It would be difficult to locate elsewhere. In its present location it is relatively obscure, hidden from view and in all aspects, is an important and necessary part of the property. It is well constructed and its appearance is an asset to the neighborhood and the community. COST; I have now incurred expenses in excess of $1000 for Orono required fees, surveys, etc. Survey Application for vacation Property owners list, variance 150 ft. Legal description for Vacation Additional survey for sewer S manhole Property owners list, 500ft vacation 2nd Property Owners list, variance Variance application $1,255 A portion of the Vacation application fee was returned. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Aw-e Jim Ogland ■4«17t Certificate of Survey for James Ogland of Lot 9, WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH Hennepin County, Minnesota AZBA of 0-1$ ' '2.oy]e. = 70'k SO'= I iVSO s.p/ /l^e/v Oh ^s'~2$d z<9ne xSo ~ \ 1^-20 s.ej Existing Legal Descripton Lot 9, WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH This survey shows the location of all existing buildings in relation to the boundaries of the above described property. It does not purp rt to show any other improvQiuonts or en croachments . •: Iron marker found o: Iron marker set Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. I I .. t i I., \fi r.O*Mh»» I'.' I iMMt.i, k \‘. »rliu * Uni^ I .iki \1\ •o: Cl J14I 1 hereby cerlify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision, and that I am a dul) registered Civil Engineer and Land Sur\ eyor under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota. STGronberc Minnesota LiceMark 5. Gronberg Minnesota License Nun.bcr 12755 DATE 3-15-93 SCALE I": 20' JOB NO. ^3-78 0 7-^0 ) 2c>ne-=So -'^20 5.f ]O'- A tM ^ l‘ CITYof ORONOMunicipal Offlco Post Office Boi 66 Bay, Minnesota 55323-<A)bft Febniary 12. 1993 Mr. James W. Ogland 3345 Crystal Bay Road Wavzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Storage Shed Construction Dear Mr. Ogland: T 1 m<»r th/» Cin' notified vou of buildins and zoning recjuirements relating to two -U>ou. BuUding As of mis da.e, mis issue remains unresolved. >""" ““s “ :.;’S Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, (^Vvs^v--. Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm. Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector TfcLEPHONE - 47>73«7 • lAX • 473-0510 DATE 3-15-93 SCALE I": 20' r CITYof ORONO Municipal OfTicn Street Mdress; 2750 fe'iey Parkway Orono. WN 55356 BUUini Address: PO Boi 66 Crystii Bay. Wfl 55323 CC66 James Ogland 3345 Crystal Bay Road Wavzata, MN 55391 RE: Storage Sheds Dear Mr. Ogland: ,n November .993, you bur;-;:ir orofT o„ you. p.opo.., o.h„ . «« railroad property. rj cuy “wIn U yoj^"" ^u-^onl^47L'“v otTice. Sincerely. Lyle Oman Building Otficial LO/lsv cc- Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator ^ Michael P. GatTron. Assisiam Building & Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang. Field Inspector Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 r ♦ !I ~ T = ’7^0 .4. ^ Z23_s£. k^----- /O 2 -y^sr t£: ^ -_S^'2P-.- - ~-/9. /Ui^Co\je^ Qm<^?^------------- ,-----------^ ^ ______________________- ___lAlh^< ^4ke^ 4P __________ J^2-_________ 9 '2^ —^ ”7 ^ r iT To:Chainnan Schn»cder and Oron»> Planning Commission Members R(>n Mt»rse. Cits Adminislraior From:Michael P Gaffnm. As>istanl Planning *X: Zoning Administrator Date:October 12. 1994 Subject: #1960 Tor Johnson. Navarre Congregation of Jehovah Witnesses. 3655 Togo Road - Variance/Condilional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC. Single l amily I.akeshore Residenti.il, 1/2 Acre Application: Request for hardcover \ariance to expand church parking lot. 1 ist of Exhibits A B C D E City EngiiKcr’s Comments Staff Memo to City Engineer 9/23/94 Notice of Planning Commission Action 9 '26'94 Planning Commission Minutes 9H9/94 Memo and Exhibits of 9/13/94 Di.scuvsion I his item was tabled at your September meeting pending review' of drainage issues by the City Engineer and Public Works Department. Staff met w ith the City Engineer and Public Works staff at the site on September 29. Referring to the topographic map. Exhibit L of the September 13 memo, note that a drainage area of approximately 30 acres contributes to the wetland area southeast of the parking lot on the adjacent propeny The only outlet for this wetland is an old underground tile underneath the adjacent property and continuing underneath Togo Ro.id to the north. This tile is of unknown construction and probably 300-400’ in length. Its outlet has not been kicated and may be below the surface of the wetland north of Togo Road. f ailure of this tile to handle heavy runoff events has lead to flooding in die rear yard of the residence immediately east of the applicants ’ preperty The City Fmgineer has recommended as a si>lution that the applicants excavate a swalc along the east side of the existing parking lot at the elevation ol the bottom ot the existing catch basin adjacent to Togo Road. Alternativelv . a 12 ” culvert could be installed to avoid having a deep and perhaps not very maintainable swale right next to the parking lot. As of this writing, applicants are gathering additional elevation data to conclude how they w'ill proceed. In a meeting with applicant ’s representative Jetf Met/ger on October 12, it was noted that given the requirement for this drainage work, applicants w ill either proceed with the 2k)ning File #1%0 Ock>ber 12. 1994 Page 2 parkine loC addition if appro>td and do the required drainage improvements, or will dHX>sc to delav (or perhaps withdraw) their request They are aware that this drainage problem will just "go away", and that in the future they wixild likely be requested to pay their fair sf-tre towards a resolution to the pn>blem if it is not resolved now. Please again revkw the memo and exhibits of September 13. and coiKludc whether there is substantial hardship and justification for granting the hardcover variance to expand the parking lot, and if si>. attach approprute conditions. Conditional I’sc Permit for Additions Planning Commission brietly reviewed the recent church structure additions which were issued building permits but for which staff did not call out the need for a conditional use permit. Planning Commission members noted the lO' x 11’ coat room addition and the 18 x 22 carport (located 47 ’ from the east property lira: where a 50’ setback is required) are mn inappropriate for the site and are less of an issue than the parking lot concerns. If Plannini! Commission concludes that these additions can remain, it would then be appropriate to have the applicant amend the current application, pay an additional $50 fee for the side setback variance, and incorp^'ralc approval into the tlnal Resolution if the parking lot is approved. If the parking lot is not approved, then the CUP/variance for additions would be a separate Resolution document. Stuff Kecummendation If Planning Commission recommends approval ot the variances for the parking lot expansion, approval should be conditioned on: 1. Applicants to complete drainage improvements per City Fngincer ’s recommendation. 2. Parking stall layout schematic he provided and the lot be striped according to that schematic. If Planning Commission concludes that the carport setback of 47 ’ is appropriate and the twi) recent additions are also appropriate, then a recommendation lor approval should include the condition that the applicants amend their application by paying the $50 incremental fee for the setback variance. Referring to Issue (f6 on Page 4 of the September 13 memo. Planning Commission may recommend whether the applicants should be required to grant a 15’ road easement per the 1970 CUP discussions and preliminary approval (see Exhibit H of 9-13-94 memo). r Zoning File #1960 October 12. 1994 Page 3 Options for Action I. Recommend approval of parking Uh expansion and Cl P'variancc for structural additions subject to coisiitions detailed aKne. 2. Recommend approval of onl\ part of the application. 3. Tabic for further information. 4. Recommend denial of all or part of the applicatit>n (mne specific reasons) 5. Other ! ! t i r 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Associates Engineers & Architects October 3, 1994 »r»n nt tjr # *%; Oils C n ^ - %l>ei»r^ I Wy ^ v-’ep ^ Q«p^ • M a ^ I# C»* *sr^ Cl •M* ♦ ..Ji.www Pf ff Pf A «v.>«P« Pf CMO luMMl* Pt %|»« • >MP»>nr-. Pf %fci* - • Pf Vc ft •»«j #’t • ArWP*^y» ft ■ C Pf •^NnPMs ft W%F» Pf . »r»ftim pf »liW ftf Pf P «au Pf ftgnpft V Poq ft »% 4 fttiP^^ P| ft Wi Pf ft C«ps« A Pi Pm4 I Gpnwpn ft > ft rrr-4N I CtlfP^ P« • k^'rniJI Pf •'" %«v C«^«0 Omt Pf PftMO *-PUP* pf ure* p Pf ft fniMii^ M Pp^P*'*!* *-»anan M C^icir a*«rs P I 'V.vP’p^ Mr Mike GatTrcm City of Orono P O Box 06 Ctystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Re Kingdom Hall - Togo Road Our File No l39-lW) Dear Mike: OCT 7 lii'-t •_<• •• We have rcvicvvitti tiw parking lot expansion for Kingdom Hall on Togo Road There is currently a draiiuge problem adjacent to the property that will be exacerbated by this expansion We would recommend that a drainage swale be constructed east of the driveway from Togo Road to the back lot line of the Kingdom Hall property I here will have to be a 25' section of 12" pipe placed from the catchbasin on Togo Road to the swale The entire length could be pipe if preferred by the property owner Please contact this otVice if you have any questions Yours v^’ truly. BONESTROO, ROSEN'E, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC ? ' / Glenn R Cook GRCpr l3«>-<3EN'6-COt 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 r n I ^ To:Glenn Cook, City Engineer John Gerhardson, Public Works Director From: Daft: Subject: Michael P. GafTroo, Assistant Planning & Zoning Adminislrator September 23, 1994 Parking Lot Hardcover Variance - Jehovah’s WiuiKS Property. 3655 Togo Road Area Drainage Concerns The Jehovah’s Witness^ cons^eeation is preposing to expand their parking lot southward, which will result in an additional'4.000 s.f. of hardcover. This item was tabled by the Planning Commission at their September 19 meeting in order that the area drainage concerns be studied bv the City. Planning Commission requests that you review the drainage issues in this area, and make recommendations as to what, if any, area drainage improvements should be atuched as conditions of approval if that hardcover variance for the parking lot is approved. A copy of the 2 ’ comcmr map for the area is attached. I would appreciate if vsxir comments and recornttKodations can be forwarded to me by Monday, October 10 in order that this item be placed on the Planning Commission’s October 17 agenda for action If you have any questions, please contact me. * ! i f .Mil - cm' OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 CnFstal Bay, MN 55J23 473-7357 TO:Tor R. Jonsen 6225 Wcsmwd Circle Mounil. MN 55364 ZOMM; HI.E #1960 NOTICi: OF PI^ANMNC. COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: Scptenibcr 26. 1994 COPIES: IX^nald I-.llk>l 15130-D 8th A\cnuc North Pl\im>uth. MN 55447 Eugene Winter 5564 Momingview Terrace MtHind, MN 55364 TYPE OF APPLICATION; Variancc/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 09/19/94 Planning Commission rccomnands the following: Table for reasons raitcd below. VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: fabled in order that drainage issues be reviewed. The City Engineer and I^iblic Works Department have been rciiucstcd to make specific recommendations lor solv ing the area drainage concerns. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is crmfirmed as: Planning Commission. Monday, October 17. 1994; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HFU> ON SEPTEMBER 19.1994 (#9) Iicm #1960 - Jd>o> ah*s Witness - Coniinucd GalS-on sated this application is a request to expand the parking lot. A hardcover variance is required in the 500-1000* zone. The 3500 sq ft driveway addition would result in hardcover cxcecdmg the 35*/^. limitation by for a total of 43?i. wereIn reviewing this application, other issues have come to light Two small additions Riven building pemuts last >-ear that should have required conditional-usc permits before ^ aUowed because of the church's location in a rradenti^ a^x thre^^de of the building. This leaves a 47 side .setback which is less than the 50* side setback requirement. A side setback vanance or partial carport removal is necessary-. /\n easting drainage problem may also be exacerbated if the parking lot is expanded and would require a condition be placed on the application that the church be involved in soK^ the problem. A handicap ramp is part of this application and is to be located where haro.ovcr already c.xists. The ramp is necessary due to an msidc stairway Applicant representative, JelTMetzger relayed the church’s desire to beautify the neighborhood A error in calculation resulted m the sct^ck requirement 'Hie ongmal parking lot plan approved m based on one stall per four seat capacity. The church did irot tuliy utilize 5;st^ nllotincnt at that time. Their request to add additional stalls now is lost with the building of the handicap ramp. Metzger also stated the church is willing to ork. with the City to sch e the drainage problem. Glen Clark of Kingdom Hall commented that on-street parking is available but Togo l^iad is s nanow suc «.'no comments have been received from the public regarding on-siieet parking. Peterson inquired of the added gravel located on the lot which is considet^todcover. Congregation membeis did not think it was hardcover wit^ut plast.c Pete'rsoi. stated churches need to be aware of not only ordinances but hardcover lim . Peterson inquired of appUcant w hat the hardship is requiring the need parking citing the eflicicncies that result when parking lot sta sate mar . . .. stated Ihe hardship was for the handicap ramp and the fact the parking lot m.t.ally approved in 1970 was not fully utilized. r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CONLMISSION meeting held on SEPTEMBER 19. 1994 (#9) Item #1960 - Jehovah's Witness - Continued V ensued on the drainage issue A study needs to be done to see where the Nolan moved. Smith seconded, to table Item #1960 to next Planning Commission meeting. Ayes 4, Nays 0 --------- ■ZJS57^^;;rmrr^RRKN I. PASCHKE, 3349 CRYS PAL BAY ROAB - variances - PUBLIC IIF^XKING / The Affidavit of Fixation and Certificate of Mailing ww^oted. Gatiron sa^d this appU^n « for side and existing deck and tatlmg 5o\t the garage which was^pnally bu.l m 1948. It ts l^tcd less than lO" from the stde^ 75' from the lake No-hardcover is allontd m the 0-75 llkestoe setback aone butl^ari.mce is tequiri^nce no increase m hardcover is being made. Con^nissionmeml^s^ ^Im^bc „"cS'Vr;e“ Men told none were needed During public comment time. [s d^^r's^^S' :XTbS^s= Smith moved. Nolan seconde/to recommend a^oval of Item #l90l. Ayes 4. Nays 0. The Affidavit ofPubli4tion raid Cciificate of Mailing w>^e noted. /k Ron Bowen of PmWc Restorations presented the olr^dXX a Type 7 wetlaniwith e.\C3vation and placement of . \„f .wetlands forest* Bowen display/S a map of the area in question showmg <>>« “X ”^^0 ’ excavation anfldeposition areas Applicant Da^oii .s ‘I’*” 5 \ MCWD environment on his property with this project. fa^Vn the lake and approval for this project Bowens sees this as a fust defense m preserving tnc says it will be developed as a natural w’atershed. r TO; FROM: DATE i Planning Onnmission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Adm September 13. 1994 SUBJECT; 11960 Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses. 3655 Togo Road - Varlancc/CUP Public Hearing Application: Request for hardcover variance to expand church parking lot. Zoning District LR- IC. Sincle Familv Residential List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners last D - List of Additional Persons to be NotiHcd E - Survev’ F - Hardcover Calculations G - 1970 Site Plan H - 1970 CUP D<x;umcnt.ition 1 - Pertinent Cixle Sections J - Buildinv! Permit #5822 and Documentation K - Section 10.56. Subd. 16(K) Pertinent Code Sections and Variances Requested 1. Section 10.22. Subd. 2 and Section 10.56. Subd. 16(L) - Hardcover limitation of 35% in 500-1.000’ zone (existing = 35%; proposed ® 43%; variance = 8%;). 2. Section 10.20. Subd. 3(B) - Churches are a conditional use in residential zones, with no buildinss to be located less than 50’ Irom an abutting residential lot. 3. 4. Section 10.61, Subds 4. 5. 7, 8, 9. 10 - Parking perfonnance standards including: • I paikini! stall required p>er 4 seats based on capacity of main assembly hall. • Setbacks for parking lots: 10’ rear. 10’ side. Section 10.56. Subd. 16(K) - Shoreland stormwater management requirements. Zoning File #I%0 September 13. 1W4 Page 2 Background Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses was granted a conditional use permit for church use in 1970 on this 1.3 acre property. A church building and parking lot were subsequently constructed, although the current survey shows that the site plan was only generally adhered to. At that time the parking lot was proposed to Include 52 parking stalls to meet the "1/stall per 4 persons" requirement for a 200 person capacity building. The parking lot was constructed ‘‘omewhat smaller than the original plan. Church use has apparently c.xpandcd to a level where during specific times the parking overflows onto Togo Road which is extremely narrow and not suited for parking. The currctit request is to expand the parking lot by approximately 36 x110’. Absent a parking layout but using the staiKlard 300 s.f. r>er stall fonnula. the additional parking area will accommodate an aaditional 13 vehicles. Hardcover Variance This property is in the 500-1,000’ hardcover setback ^one and with the recent structural additions (discussed below) the propeny had reached its hardcover limit of 35%. The proposed additional parking increases 500-1.000’ hardcover to approximately 43%. It may be siimewhat ironic that the church at one time owned the residenti"! propeny to the west but some time ago sold that propeny. Unfortunately, that might have allowed the expansiiin without a variance had that propeny been combined with the church parcel. Drainage Concerns The low area between Togo Road and Nonhem Avenue has been subject of some concern to neighborhood residents due to past drainage problems. The Ihjblic Wiirks Depanment and City Ensineer arc currently evaluating the drainage needs in this area. Ihe church parking lot may contribute significantly to the volume ol runoff in the area. If this parking lot expansion is approved, the church should be expected to contribute its fair share towards a solution. Such solution might include curbing the parking lot perimeter to direct drainage, construction of stormwater detention ponding facilities, or perhaps tinancial participation in a neighborhood drainage improvement. Any approval for the paT’king lot should be conditi^ulcd on obtaining the church’s involvement in such project. h would seem appropriate that any approval recommendation not be forwarded to Council until the City Engineer af’d I’ublic Works Department have completed their review ol this situation. Zoning File #1960 September 13, 1994 Page 3 Recent Additions The church applied for and was granted a building permit for a lO'xl 1' coat room addition and a 14'xl8’ carpon in December 1993. Imfortunatel), the inspectkins department did not call out the rjced for a cortditional use permit, which normally would be required for siKh additions. This error only came to light during the current parking lot review. Additionally, the church constructed the caiTvrt to extend 22’ cast from the building rather than the 14’ proposed, and that carport is now 47’ from the cast property line where a 50' setback w»>uld ncmnally be required for any church structure c.xisting as a conditional use permit in a residential zoiw. Since the constrtKted carp«m diHfs not meet the parameters of what was approved, it would be reasonable to require the carport to be reconfigured to meet the 50* setback Technically, tlie City should also require the formality of the church filing a conditional use permit application for the expansions which have already been permitted. Issues to Consider 1. Is there substantial hardship and justification for granting a hardcover variance to expand the parking lot? 2. If the parking lot is allowed to expand, staff would recommend tliat a parking stall layout schematic be provided and that the lot required «o be striped. 3. 4. 5. Since the parking lot expansion suggests expansion of a conditional use in a residential zone, it can be argued that the parking lot expansion is in fact an amendment to the original conditional use permit which was ba.sed on a specific site plan which is now’ changing. Please review the 1970 discussions by Planning Commission and Council reeardini! this conditional use. and note that at that time the practice was to approve conditional use permits without a resolution. If the parking lot is allowed to be expanded, proper drainage control facilities need to be developed. It may be appropriate that .such facilities be designed to help alleviate existing neighN>rhood drainage problems. Regarding the additions constructed via a permit issued in error.; Should the church be required to file an aftcr-the-fact conditional use permit? - Is there any reason why the City staff should not proceed to require the carport be reconstructed tv> meet the 50 ’ setback? t/.o Zoning Fik #1960 Sqxcmbcr 13, 1994 Page 4 6.Perhaps unrelated to either of these issues is that the 1970 conditional use pennit discussions and preliminary approval by Council required a 15* road easement be granted. The survey indkalcs a 10’ road easement. The Public Works Department would like an eascmcni including 10’ of shoulder in addition to the paved road area. Suff has iwt researched whether any easement documents were ever c.\ccutcd for this road. Options for Action 1. Approve as proposed. 2. Approve with conditions. 3. Tabic for funher information. 4. Recommend denial for specific reasons. 5.Other. c:rr\’ of oro.no - variance application Initial Application Fcc^20o|ot^ ($50.00 per each additional >ariance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original applkatkm) Variance for non-confomiing structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address___________‘nr.r.K Propern Identification Number (P.I.D.) *11 a gO V ■V t J 17-117-23 31 0036 Attach legal description to application if not included on required sur\ey. Date Fropcrt>' Acquired^__________v.^rr-h iq7 q I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ___residential ____other (specify) ch^irrh Zoning District:___________Peaidentiai _______________________ (monih/ycar) . TT* .*jr lSiC^yyyVO_ \• k ^ * Cw" I f»* ' ^ ^ APPLICANT Name Tor R..Tnri5;pn Phone (homc)_ __ PhcHie(work)_ W* A r.“a- T, t i. • V V A ^ W* V • i'Ni‘V472-205(3 ..y rip-V.-.., * ♦ 1 . ♦ ' ’;)1 / ■ ^ ^ i Address:f^225 Wpstvood circle Cin: Mound Zip: 55364 i’ S ' ^ OWTsER (if different than applicant) 1‘hondhcme) Name ;;avarra.-t7oriir c.f J«hovab--s Witncg5;«»B Phone (uork)_ Address: Togc* _____________Cin:MTVTr rio>Zip:_*S292 DESCRIPTION OF RE(^l'EST Estimated Construction Cost $____2.^Q*I!Q. Describe request in detail:_____Extending existing parkin-^lot 100x36* '---------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARLVNCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width /H ardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average I.ukeshore Other (specify) ILVRDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNXSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions presenting compliance with Zoning Code requirements: This will insure that all oarkina vill-t>e on rhnrrh propf?rty wtipn vp h.-tvp ;^n nve^rf^nv ■Tr-tprdan'^P<nj-be npr>df»rt- .t1 1 y with Tejo Road being Quite narrow StCSStu--------------------------— part, nf nur exisistlna oarkinu lot vill be used .Toj‘_a_handlcap-ratnp access t-n fVir» Pbiirnb_______________________________________________—---------------—----------------—---------'" (attach additional sheets if necessary) r §fFl REQUIRED SUBMITTALS % All of the informatioTi mo ^ by ^^mitted hiJhejnpi>lk:;it{on_dca(1linti(l.M i^r vour^op pH^*"" to be com jdend CTTOP^ttgl a \ List of ownen within 150* (you must obtain this list from J ^ ^X.n C^my Depanment of Finance. A-603. Govt Center. 348-3271). 3. l^Pla 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). iS^rarte sur^cv (existing and pre^osed elevations) if any changes in existing grade — arVproposed. In iddUion. provide one (U copy S'Y x If for rep^uction Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8 “T^List of the lecal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest m the nropcrtv This would iiKlude namc(s) of applicant(s) if nrvt current owner(s). an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of an> other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Profcny Owner nnist sign Lhis applicaiion Please J’;' HlUE .-.pplimiion is not coinpleleJLl-hc ahovg inforiiKilion_h.is not tmn imludiw. TlL*'tpplicara toJbv^grees*^ provide all information required or requested by the Zoning “o aTmes to pay additional fees (staff time no. covered by original fee payment) ^o? comulun. expenis' incurred in review of this applicat.on and certifies lha. the information supplied is truY*^ ^rrec^io the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature m‘IThfm^y an/agrees to this application entry onto the property by City staff, coasuliants, agents. Commission members. an_ Date entrv onto me propeuy uy \-uy aum. --------------- ■ members for ' Owner’s Signature .r^^^ t"***^\^ ----Date----- Applicant must have'^l't^totolsI'^The Cityl^mcefW?a^before 'j' Meeitnu. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the rhtrd Monday ^ Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the 1 ^nts and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, p eas Office of to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the ui mg *- this change prior to the meeting. J?v 8 r Oi< \ > V) eir^ •3 V?w (??j( « (17) TJ4 T V /> • M’ srX.<^" 15’ H \'^ (44) ^ ^ *% n XM (35) t o % (35* ( 34):(33): (» . . /y^V - ' ''H'2, \ -^>^ ■f‘ / t* ^'{ toy „ ^ ,y, ^ sV^ ,'Xl»•v ' ■f^'**.V((;)/' / 4 , r.^ » ' /' o- ^y>9,xx K itt) .' , ' •» <»»>/ . / >■ \ •fc..' / * /(9)v»* ^/ / f / « • IJ6) • ,.• < •■.■’y*/^> '”> *' -' - . /( I3«) / ’3 / / :<\y ? /•%% < *'"fATlC ' t43)i7 * ^ /C( I44U* » / mi, / ? »«0 * ’* >2 3I)30)I‘'9 M SI :x' 4.231. :o !?. 3 8 (23) S' »i 39 ^ (2<)p «i 43 ?U5)F §) f «7%" •' i IVTVjTYC'N 5! irg (?V) ? . ._ t"0 (39) ^ 1:: j (39) ^ 1)0 4 I' (4CM25 16. i (k) *" .^ ( 34) ^ ^ f A^'‘69SI jyrr^ ^ fkfi% $. ^ (^9)r .'c »3; N69-M £ I5O') * «n •» O !4 f~'33 5 71 ? u. ^ 1 • 3 1- '« (35)k'50) .r* ' :v> ^'vi .2? (51) 30 >J 50 50 *0 t? “ (50) 50 « £ • / 1____—IK 5(43) ^ - 30 f» -13 15 : »53: IS wt ^ ?: ? -IT (55) 50X30soK 5C (47)(46) •r 30 y VI 19 (56) / (41)(4?) / a TTosTOf loT fS :^tt 7 “ (57) y. (45) (44) 30 y 30 7 73? ?(56) (50) (43) 30 LU Qlcr > <X ;r ir 71' Lsl LYRIC ■LM MTI aft/iS/f*I* 4MTCN OMAmCMC! MM TAXFAYftAmr TA)9AYflNiM/Am i 4 V fcop Am <mR MAK A)9AYIA NM/Am ll^iTAMFAYfA 1*. cowtt wopfiYT imvemrim mrnATY OWiAS ItSTM ir-lif-jl fi MMi OMfO TOQO to AANDOttA A MfARAMwttmm tturrA 149A TOGO ASM RAYZATA m 553AlSi ir-uT-M n tosi05470 TOGO AOmmjn tast co ot ca ra AimtAtV A»t4 SCMAIli 5470 TOGO AOmayzata iti ssin TASTl» i7-ii7-n 51 ms 05A7S TOGO AOAAIM NXUXAM URAf AAIAA AERAf 5471 TOGO » RAYZATA RN 553ft 50 17-U7-E5 51 01 05440 TOGO AO AARELA 0 AETEAS PAMELA 0 PETEAS 5440 TOGO AO RAYZATA fOi 55591 50 17-117-15 54 0014 05^55 tOOO AO RAAT t tlPPOCAGEA NAAV E OCRCPtCA 5455 TOOO AOAO RAYZATA ftl 55591 . , . ' fm» AOM *0M«a NM« TJOVAVCR NAHE/ADM W ir-lir-ts 54 0017 05040 NORTKRN AVC MMiS 0 OOUOCK AOHIS OOUOCR-OFtXFia S040 NORtMIlIN AVt MAYZATA m 55591 > ‘■»'r ^ •* j,» S^t *' f- A V t, • <*( 5» 17-Uf-n 510S4O0 TOOO to 09010 i f«59ilICB 19 J fOOMtICMrooo to m 551*1 oozo00S550 17-UT-tS II 0^57 TOOO to M 0 Muiitm AIM Muiitm H I HULIAHS tin MULIATO 5*17 roeo toHATZATA m 551*130 17-U7-C3 n 001«014ft TOOO to 7090 C9C JCMOVAM MlT*«9Sf5 MAVAMf CONO or JtHOVAJi MtTM RIM6D0H mu list TOCO to HATZATA (04 553*1 50 17-117-t5 54 OeOt 05790 NMttEtM AVf no J 51ICNTA IT4L ICO A SUCNTA 5700 MORTItlON AVf MAYZATA «N 553*1 50 17-117-75 54 0015 00050 AOOOfSS itU5SI9«B jtFFtrT tooctr nu jtFFRcv tooctr mi 5400 NOtTMCON AVt MAYZATA f04 55591 50 17-^17-23 54 Bold 05470 NOtTMttN IVf R t JOtOCON AMR J0MN50N MBEtT 0 a MYIA R JONTeON 5470 NORTHfRM AVt MAYZATA HN 55391 tCtORT m. tI450401PASS 19 ••W-It 17-11*-ZS 51 OflO 01440 tooe «0BMtr A tBftil JR3449 rcCO to MAv;ata »t« 55S*1H fl C51403445 rooo toOil CAtiOOM cut 0 CAtlSON14*5 TOOC to MAT7ATA »«« 551*1 *7‘510 17-117-75 11 t057cAtotrr 9°!xoc Ji»«itz if it CAttf rr s RtKMttOQTZ 1405 TOOO to mayzata 104 55591 1* 17-lir-tl 54 0015 03450 NOtTHttN AVt TM0HA5 J OmO€VlR nmiAs J ou Rmevir 5410 M0RTWW4 AVf mayzata m §53*1 30 17-117-75 54 0014 05400 NORTWm AVE JiFFttY R mt JiFTREY R ZUL 5400 NORTMtait AVt ' MAYZATA MN §5191 '4 i'^ 11 '4 ‘ •: ’ ■' '• ' ' '■fJ' 1..* f » • iit*,i'i. f*,. •1 .-Hi.v, • s . • TOTAL MTt!l r e 7 Tor t.Joeisen, Married. 622S Westwood Circle,Mourd 55364 Presiding Overseer. President I • e 8 Donald Elliott. Married. 15130-D 8th. Ave.Mo. Pywouth.Mh.55447 Service Overseer •8 Engene Winter, Married. 5564 Morningview Terrace,Mound Mn.55364 Secretary ^ I <14.0 r HARTCOVER CALCUUTIOH WORKSHEET SETBACK ::n£: (circle cne) 0-75' 75-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone P A. House D. Sidewalk E.Deck areas underlain BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. OTHEr 13’ 2sn < '3:'L 3 X ._«J. f S.F. LENGTH WIDTH /D 5<1X 2-^ '•«2T',S.F. If 1X //S.F. r-f %K -2.^2 S.F. D 1X fli /V2.0 S.F. /? <c~■I 3VZM S.F. ^ I 0 o <1c t 1-0 a 1 2,0OOs .f. lO X t 2.C- Z-oo S.F. "T X ZO S.F. X S.F. X r:;S.F. X S.F. • h X LT)'IGO S.F. X VS’S.F. >r GSr 272.S.F. A/>r 33 S.F. Xf S S.F. 2 1153"S.F. TAL H ardcover iN LONE P roperty A rea IN Zone >/3:7. (a S.F. 2 i.« ^5.^^•n 'W- C?- X 100 = 0 */S, ^‘(5- '' o f :::) t:) B % ■ >••:-■;•■• ' -V.^- ■;.■ • . - . « * . . .,. .. ' V • ’• • V .’•.■ . f. *’ i •• ■• ■ *-4'»'• • . •• 1 ;>*.• ‘ « . ..*,* r »5 • . ‘ . • ’ • ■ « * •* f • • ‘* * * . >. • “ ** "• •■■'■■• ! •■ ■. . •; - .. f ••••' • '•■ '■: •• • •,\:v5 §3 V» s ^ V •r» *• aT'j' ■ i£MlM •« . ». «t > A 4* T‘^.i • • *•’• T '^ , , ., •.■»•' *-■♦ •. »Vrv; ‘h tetefel ;*|k| ;' "5vi ’ . ^ 1 J .! . w . .. . .w*- r .rf ■=.••'^ -^.V-rraAM ?/-.:■ #11M mm '•^•' sA’."5 ;./'Vr,.- rsfe?#p-f " ••^ . rv v.r.i;- I'i- •I I .-vv.- ■ ,».••.•> Jit-v| " ™ •.•, *i' ■'.ll•••^•■^■tJ ■^mM.c.:r ^3 • i* ' V».; ..•r. ;A.-.v.r.i:> ■ ■ •■ M- V-.. • p .;v^ePP'S 4' Q. c.cj. .R. a .A im lH PP^HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA t>BC ?s ro>r«i Mil* ra«n«] Rr« tlfOl FstiMf] rtm^j m «%VILLACI: or 000(0Manning CMMifsioo net on tJie Above Ipallberg, and Councilmn UeCmrthy, Abseo:*2-“*sc‘iu.“:isj;Jiiwsclf in an ' coiiiUtlonal us^ permit to fill 6,000 tquwre foot of lov land ^rlng conitructlon on Lot S, aiock 2 Mrrtlowood. RiiSfoll a letter iron «ttorney to the Villa**- Actome/ followed bv tiw* -.e •*, « •7:50 P.y.rONDTTIOVM. USE PERMIT ‘tyrtl<'wood Road •IXeKIft jr —TT'^ * r «Ut i.V t■'■'i , ^LAl Vitl *1 >1 t'«.l »i«H r* •A j r. »f* ai «< pim. iSKi ■i'4. -h - A- -1A -•. -■• 'A V: -. ,. V' 'i, -V ’•■'• Juu C J.^' i V , Ih. P „ - ■ ^-T^mpti^f... .-Vl * W- I'■■■y :i?r ..";*^C^V’^ Cr. ^ ' V»*• *'*''/*V • •• V.^^*.« ^f***f 'V > »*if * ■• ^.»4^ y. . >»• ?*** ‘ f w> <■' •>■ r»'*V'.:. » . - . -■ *.■'/.'*« ► V $!•• ** .■t •> -■ <.' t . 4 i'» ? ‘i7r* - m L'v^;‘3;l';-it. yV'T'^/v''' ' “•' £at2S2:Ji2::4;;*i **>s«s• ♦f T-.-:. 'Slk^_■ 'It'^ y >/ • ■, ;V ■ * t. •% * (• • «Ti.nV *■ . ^ k. • ' 4> ■"* - •# 4 ► «i‘ »- ^ *4•«■...., ',.’' ..v-'>v> r^r?"'» r . •-*;>- f » .4V*#-iog«r R*td, Attorntjr Box SOT NooiB, Mlftaofotii SSS64 Door Rofor: BOcletoB ploaso flad dupllcoto fonio for o €oa4itloool ttoo porolt roqulrod to ploco o church to • rotlBoatiol ' ■ * < ( Am for 00 tho dioioion gooo--o dirioioo woo poid for oad opprorod fbr o Mrs. norio BoochooMi, oAiloiotmti for tho Iric Ztll oototo. Sho triod to got foor loto oat of tho oototo oad woo opprowod for two. Sho thaa nowor brought In o plot for opprowol. I would ooftoot pott Borolp bring In o drawing how m propooo to diwido tho load, otopiag within tho loata lialto of ono*holf ocro oad 100* froatogo for oithor lot. 1 will thoa oubait both tho plot ond tho condltloaol woo porait to tho Vi lingo Council nad Floaaiag Coaaiooioa for approval. If poo oro in o hurrp. thio would hovo to bo in bp Pridap aoraiag. Juao 12, 1970. oo it could bo on tho Ploaaiag Cooniooioa ogondo for Juno IS, 1970; othorwiso, it would hove to bo in bp Julp 9, 1970 fsr aoxt aonth'o Council ogondo. Slncorolp pours. Nike Schollor IMSPBCTIOM DEPAWMIW MStnt Bncloturo A V 4T - •.. . V- • • •*• • ^ $■ »b^ $ 10.20 - H SEC. 10.20. K-IA OWE PMIILY RESIDEWTIAI. DISTRICT.Subd. 1. Purpo*€. The "R-IA" One Farally Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow a cosbination of low density residential develcpnent and limited agricultural activity. Planned residential developments may bo allowed by conditional use permit. The district shall have isunediate access to highways a.nd public sanitary sewer. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "R-lA" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or acre of the following uses: A. One family detached dwellings. B. Public owned parks and playgrounds. C. Municipal buildings. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "R-lA" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by ccnditional use permit: A. Schools. Public schools and parochial or private schools which teach a curriculum similar to a public school provided no building shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District and that a fence be erected fifteen feet or more from all street lot lines where the abutting use is for open play, and nursery schools providing fifty square feet of playground space per pupil. B. Churches. Churches including those related structurdtf located on the same site which are an integral part of the church proper, convents or homes for persons related to a religious function on the same site provided no building other than a residence shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. C. Clubs, Camps, etc. Golf courses, country clubs, tennis clubs, public swimming pods serving more than one family, scout camps, Y.MCA camps, YWCA camps, church camps, or private non profit parks, playgrounds and other similar uses. The principal structure for any of the above listed uses shall be 100 feet or more from any abutting lot in an "R" District, and accessory structures shall be a minimum cf fifty feet from any lot line. ORONO CC 279 (4-1-84) $ 10.61 one square Duildinq. No "B-1", "B* more than principal feet froio feet nay principal Source: Mj^fiicipal Code Sf fectiv/K^ate: 9-14-67 n •3-1-, -B-2Vand Height. within the • 2- and’-B-4- Distr icts>sW^gn shall extend two feet above the higheS^utside wall or parapet of a y buUdtno nor shall an^^^e located any property line e^ept *^''*f* project two feet i^o any reqfc^^red yard area trow the building . Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Oat^ 1-1-75 3-3“ and "I": Height. Within adv "B-3" or "I" District no ^on shall extend in height more heiqht above hiohest outside wall or parapet_^ of a 1 nn shall located closer thdn wen fett y oroiei-y* except that any sign exceeding ten square feet may project n/fv two feet into the yard area from any building. c.,K,^ 4 Puroose of Off-Street Parking and Loading Subd. 4. ^ f off-street parking and loading spaces in^^hiri^apier /''to ^llev Ute -jrevent^conges^^^^^^^^ Je\%rrt'of thf "'by^'estTblUh^ing m 've"h?c\es'Yn °aC^’o"rdance parking, loading and n-rceia of land and structures,with the utilization of various P-teexo ot lana^ districts All applicatiot.s for an occujjancy scale and dimensioned !ndlLub|%T^o«Uon^"f off-street par.inq and loading spaces in compliance with the following requirements: Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 A. Application of Parking Rules icts.^^ In addition to the regulations requirements regarding this Chapter, the and non-required off-street parking shall apply off-street parking facilities in all use districts. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 B. Parking 0^000^10^"which" ^bSurinr^rr^t ^h«en ^^sue^J^^rior-to=^Soptes.ber ». 1967. but ORONO CC 302 (4-1-84) s 10.61 fo’* which work has not been completed shall be exempt from the h«.r*.inafter stated parking reouirements if the structure is started r^ithin six months after September 16, 1967, and continues to completion. C. Existing Parking Not to be Reduced. Off-street parking spaces and loading' spaces existing on September 14, 1967, shall not be reduced in number unless said number exceeds the requirements set forth herein for a similar new use. D. Floor Area. The term "floor area" for the tjuroose of calculating the number of off-street parking spaces fhall be the net usable floor area of the various floors, devoted to retail sales, services, office spaces, processing and fabrication exclusive of hallways, utility space, storage areas other than warehousing. E. Seat. In stadiums, churches and other places of Dublic assenbly*^in which patrons or spectators occupy benches, pews or other similar seating facilities, each 22 inches of such seating facility shall be counted as one seat for the purpose of determining required parking. Size of Parking Spaces. Each parking space shall be not less than nine feet wide and twenty feet in lengtn and each space shall be served adequately by access drives. o Durposes of calculating parking space requirements, one parking ^pl^ for Le iehicle shall equal 300 square feet of storage and maneuvering area including access drives. G. Commercial Vehicle Parking. facilities accessory to residential use shall J for the parking of passenger automobiles. 7,000 pounds gross capacity and V H ir ict shall be parked or stored in a residential ^ loading, unloading or rendering a service, except , vehicle may be parked at the residence of the owner or <^P®Yuties said vehicle. Under no circumstances gtoLge accessory to residential structures be used of commercial vehicles nor for open air pa g tenant purposes of automobiles belonging to the or Customers of business or manufacturing establishments other than the home occupation permitted for that proper y. Required the same off-street lot as theH. Location of Parking, parking in the "R" Districts shall be on principal building. Subd. 5. SetbacKS for Parkina. °'*:®tblck parking In all districts shall meet the following requirements: ORONO CC 383 (4-1-84) 51 S 10.61 A. "R" Districts. Within all "R" Districts all vehicles nonaally owned or kept by the occupants on the prealses oust have a garacie stall or open parking space on the same lot as the orincipal use served. Garage stalls accessory to residential Structures may be located anywhere on the let other than a required vard area except that such carages may be located to within ten feet of an interior side lot line and to within ten feet of a rear lot line subject to Section 10.03. Open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a required yard except that such parking may be located in a rear yard to within ten feet o an Lterior side lot line and to within ten feet of a rear lot line. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 B. "3" Districts. Within the "B — 2" District parking may not*be allowed in any required yard or landscaping !rla Within the -B-1-, -B-3“ ard "3-4" Districts parking spaces and/ir garages shall be located in areas other than a except that parking may be located in a rear yard to feet of the rear or side lot line unless the rear or side lot is L common with an "R" District; then the setback distance shall be the same as required for the "R" District. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 C. "I" Districts. Within *'I" Districts, off-street parking spaces shall be not less than twenty feet from any street right-of-way line nor less than five feet from any interior side lof line or rear lot line, except when a side or rear lot is abutting an -R“ District. Then, off-street parking sha.l be not less than ten feet from said lot lines. Subd. 6. Joint Parking. Required parking facilities the "B" or "I"* Districts may be located lot provided that the total ^///aVale furnished shall be not less than the sum total of the separate requirements for each use and provided: A. The proposed joint parking space is within thirt' feet of the use it will serve. B. The applicant(s) shall show that there is no rore'rAd\n;s"«'Urtor";h'?ch"foinru^^^^^ facilities is instrument approved by the City Attorney, executed by the P«'=>«= ith ^t°he" Ci?y of off-street parking facilities shall ‘cement Clerk. Said instrument may be a three or more party agreement including the City. ORONO CC 384 (4-1-84) 4 s lo.fil Subd. 7. Control of Parking Facilities. When required accessory off-street parking facilities are provided elsewhere than on the lot on which the principal use served is located, written authority for using such property for off-street parking shall be filed with the City so as to maintain the required nunber of off- street parking spaces during the existence of said principal use. No such parking facilities at its closest point shall be located more than 100 feet from the premises nor more than 300 feet from the principal use or building served. Subd. 8. Storage Prohibited. Required off-street parking space in all districts shall not be utilised for open storage of goods or for the storage of vehicles which are inoperable, for lease, rent or sale. Subd. 9. Design and Maintenance of Parking Areas. A. Access. Parking areas shall be designed so as to provide an adequate means of access to a public alley or street. Said driveway access shall not exceed thirty feet in width at the public walk center line and shall be so located as to cause the least interference with traffic movement. All off-street parking spaces shall have access off driveways and not directly off of a public street. B. Fractional Spaces. When the determinino of the number of required off-street parking spaces results in a fraction, each fraction of one-half or more shall constitute another space. C. Signs. Signs located in any parking area necessary for orderly operation of traffic movement shall be in addition to accessory signs otherwise permitted. D. Surfacing. All of the area intended to be utilized for parking space and driveways for four or more vehicles shall be surfaced with material to control dust and drainage. E. Lighting. If lighting is provided it shall be accomplished in such a manner as to have no direct source of light visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent land. F. Curbing. All open off-street parking areas designed to have head-in parking along any lot line shalj. provide a tire bumper or curb of adequate height and properly .ocated to ensure that no part of any car will project beyond the required setbacks. Subd. 10. Required Off-Street Parking. Where the principal use of the structure served is as listed, the minimum parking facilities (open or enclosed) shall be as shown. A. Single Family Dwelling. Two per dwelling unit. B. Multiple Dwelling. Two per dwelling unit. ORONO CC 385 (4-1-84) .fil s 10.61 C. Motel, Motor Hotel, Motor Court or Hotel. Four spaces plus at least one parking space for each guest room provided in the design of the building. D. School, High School Through College. At least one parking space for each seven students based on design capacity pjLus one for each three classroows. E. Churches, Auditoriums, Undertaking Establishments. At least one parking space for each four seats based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall. F. Theater, Athletic Field. At least one parking space for each six seats of design capacity. G. Community Center, Post Office, YMCA, YWCA, Physical Cultural Studio, Pool Halls, Libraries, Private Clubs, Lodges, Museums. Ten spaces plus one for each 300 square feet of floor area in excess of 2,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. H. Hospital. At least one parking space for each three hospital beds. I. Golf Courses, Country Clubs, Tennis Club, Public Swimming Pools. Twenty spaces plus one for each 300 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. , . cnnJ. Day Nurseries. Four plus one for each 500 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. Source; Municipal Code Effective Date; 9-14-67 K. Office Buildings and Professional Offices, Banks, Savings Institutions. At least one parking space for each 200 square feet of floor area. Source; Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date; 1-1-75 L. Drive-In Establishments. At least one parking space for each fifteen square feet of floor area in the building. M. Bowling Alley. At least six parking spaces for each alley. N. Motor Service Stations. At least three off- street parking spaces plus two additional off-street parking spaces for each service stall. „ ^O. Retail Sales and Service Establishments. At least one off-street parking space for each 150 square feet of floor area. . ORONO CC 386 (3-1-84) r CITY OF CRCKO r'ee: $ — BDILDING PERMIT APPLICATICM Date P«»«~^ive<3t ^ •y red By: Date Approved Pen.it I: INTORMATIOH HtTST BB SUBMirTBI. IK PnU. PL^N RJr.’IEM WILE BB STARTED (Sec Check-off List t-nclosed) _____ APPLICA2JT IS: (circle cne) c yin J /O >fo fL ^SITS ADDRESS:__3_6j£i r CCHTRACTOR DIP: ___ I? . C? OKIJER:__; lid ^LDDR-KSS • (work ) pnOJIE: (hcne) DIP: 7-prv'. >/ /rl'^\CrJ?OR ADDP^SS: i - // > ,/ltL.:nG s LICENSE: # phone : (Tt/ ' V ^ ^ 9 QQ Cim IIP: 3^\y— 'TECT/EIiGINEER: :iJG ADDPwESS:___ PEOirE: C^T? 2 IIP: registration # , „ Ap»d'—-on Accessory Structure------- Kove^ Rl“5a5T/Alta=«I;n^ Renovate- - - Land Alteratacn_ y BEDROOMS:garage stalls : ATT.DET. 7*TED CONSTRDCTION valuation (excluding land): 5 -------------------- -eby apply for a building conformance with the e is complete and accurate; that the wo the State Building Code; that I :ances and codes of the City and without a permit; and IANT * S SIGNATURE DATE: A Jl % 4 f ilxnnr of orono’50 Ketley Parkway • ®.0. Bos 815 Orono. Minnesota 55356-0815 (612) ^73-7357fE ADDRESS:3t-SS T»»:* n o PERMIT TYPEPermit Numoef Date Issued 1 :■/ 1* /-a p . 1 . N. : 17-117-23-3 1 -«>>?6 SCRIPTION •=^*01 Tim Buildinj PertMil Typc- Pu 1 1 <:J 1 rr9 Uo rf 7 y pt- •-*6'C 0 c c Lip « n c y C onn t r u f i 1 -:»n 7 y f f_. Joniivj I NS T -AOO ' R AOC> IT 1 im rt ^ 1 Vfl • V. MARKS; SEPr.R.7TE; PERMIT RE<H)If;ED FCiR FLEClP ’KriL < STATE > E SUMMARY: BfiSiS Fot; Ple<n F<oviow Surcharge* Total Fot? VAU.JA r I ftM 1 '33. C'<> f113.70 —$3^25 $3 :-:5.35 ^ 13,5':*<;» cm OF am} n.V4,M-£ CFflCE 131310'2C00 01 C£H 193.00 -t3^mooco — 129.70Ql C£H 12:2200m 0: C£S 9.25 mtk—h —33^95- RECUPT-rimK YOU 8292300 coot kQl JC'S'.l 12/16/i ^NTRACTCJR; - Applicant - iETt:GER JEFF REV 14'^ '-'13 kO :'470 FAIRVIE'J LA MM 553ff,4 tS12.? 472-1330 **•. , «» %«# <» • > ~ ^ —ii™» mmmmmmmmrn ^ r* 7' W s. *» t ^ ^ *7 .*r • OWNER: JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES SPSS Ti;i:,':i rd C'RriNri MM 55391 LR.NU LRJINANl.Eo ANu state of MINNE'rOTA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. 'o ___ 'll- 7 r*i»ifT»i S^' • * V [•raMiii 1«J [•Ki] •uac«j [•HC l•T3KfY•H• ^Tmi riHW "\ TililiiHlK ijlli f!atp%^gustafson design, Inc. Octo^r 13,1994 I Mr. Mlkf> Gaffroo Asst. Buikiirry ami Toning Adfrtfnlsirator City of Orooo P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Gaffron: in reforence to the Lear application. Vi's have planned tno foltowma landscape for the entire bank and wafl areas; • The lower wall areas will to planted w;in evergreens and hedges a© as to hide the entire wall surface after a modest amount of growth. • Tito upper wa'ls and sloped areas will have a combination ot apecimen shrubs and svergreens, and the balance of the area will be planted with masses of perennial flower s. • The entire work area will have the soil covered with a Celstor erosion mat and a thick layer of wood fiber mulch with netting pinned over the aurtace In the sloped areas. There will be no seeding, and any sod on slopes will be staked to prevent erosion. The propos«Mj plans will more than compensate for any removal necessary to complete the wall work on the site. I will provide you a transparency of the landscape planting plan for the Monday meeting to use (if needed) to answer questions on the extent of the planting plan. Thank you for your help with this request. Spcar$\y, bale A. Gustafson 1845 Wisconsin Ave No. Golden vaiiev, MN 55427 tei (6i2) 544-4215 I^9 Bonestroo Rosene AfxJertik & Associates Engineers A Architects October 11. 1994 Ode O •f dnM>f « ^ • k<vdb« ^ iKfXditft \lF». *f • Cm 'f *'*««wnai I ^ •toe* 0 ^ W«r M C ^ • •■-nor Cjnwtjrt ^Me? • MM n MT A :,j..'«nn •BMW « •• •b«^« a ^ OMM C Mbw C *u%«« a « A Mmbt et M»w A WBTW At Mfc «M T IM»BPW •< 1 har>sM t AMWnr « a Oce M C lUMi ^ Teor-^ A WA k < Af •Mwr ; lilwniiM^ M Af MthdT A Bf lA lM« A c A *h«»hpi *’ Mi' — ■ Af MrAoP C IMW At wne- • MUM At •*\ D Mo%h Af » ae Af M' AM a AnM-M Al MW • M\ Af MpA a <ifi«. Af a«rf '4> A| Aiu I Ganf%er\ a = a Dm J tiAfi'Wi At A Birt kMMi At AMp i Cmw« Af Maw Af MM • Jntn At Mr. Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Buildini; and Zoninf; Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bav. .Minnesota 5.>323 Re: Lear Residence File No. 139-1%-^ Dear Mike, Wc have reviewed the report prepared by American l:ngineering Testing. Inc. for the proposed retaining walls and riprap along the shoreline of Spring Park Bay on the Lear residence at 2525 IhinwTDody Avenue. The most recent plans for the retaining wall system are acceptable from an engineering standpoint, Ilmvever. the plans show a slope of 2.5 to 1 and we would recommend a maximum slope of 3 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). ITic steeper slopes will be difficult to maintain and would represent a high potential for erosion until a suitable ground cover has been established. Unless the grading i.s moditied, the applicant should provide more information about the type of ground cover proposed and whether or not the slopes will be mowed. If seeding is proposed, we recommend an erosion control blanket be used for the steep slope areas. Prior to starting the work, silt fence should be installed along the shoreline for e:i .non control. IMea.se contact me at this office if you have any (juestions regarding this matter. Yours verv trulv. BONESTROO, ROSF.NE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MINI 551J3 • 612-636-4600 B A cAMERICAN ENCIVEEIING TESTING. INC. CON>lllAMS•OlCnCHMCAl• \t AimiAtS • ESAIROSAUM Al October n. 1994 Mr. Dale Gustafson Gustafson Design. Ific. 1845 Wisconsin Avenue North Golden Valley, MN 55427 l^taimng Walls and Shore Ih-otcction Rccommcrdaiions Lear Residence 2525 Dunwoody Avenue Orono, Minnesota AET 4f94-1943 Dear Mr. Gustafson: This report presents our opinions and recommendations concemmg design and construction of new shore protection and backyard retaimng walls at the referenced project site located along the east shore of Spring Park Bay on Lake Minnetonka. You authonzed our services on September 16, 1994. PROJECT INFORMATION Based on information furnished by you, the project will consist of constructing a system of retaining walls between the existing house and Lake Minnetonka shoreline. New shore protection along the lake is also planned. The currently-planned reuimng wall layout is shown on the attached copy of a plan drawing you furmshed to us. The proposed retaining walls consist of stone facing with geogrid-reinforced earth behind the facing. Wall height will be a maximum of about 7'. A Lannon-type stone material is proposed for the wall facing. This stone consists of rectangular pieces of limestone with dimensions varying from 4” to 12" high, 12" to 18" long, and 12" deep (from front to back of facing). The stone piece surfaces are Hat and achieved by fracturing the stone, so there is moderate roughness to the stone suriaces. Lake shore protection on your project site currently consists of scattered cobbles and boulders up to about 12" in diameter. Typical shore protection for adjacent properties consists of large (up to 4' in diameter) irregular field stone boulders fitted in place. It appears the boulders extend from 4' to 5' above the present lake level to about 2' below lake level. We understand these adjacent shore protection nprap systems have been in-place for ten years or more. During our site visit, it appeared those adjacent riprap systems were in excellent condition. AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 2102 Unlftnity Ar«. Ht • St. Paul, MN S5114 » €12 959 9001 • Fax 512-559-13T9 44J1 Wet! Stre«t. Suit# §4 •Duiutf' MN 5580? • Ji8-628-t5l0 628-t5S0 t730F*»jl Av#nu« .Ma^nato MN 56001 .507 387-2222 .Fai 507-387-6999 mMi •Ian: llMM^iiWMlsMiiil M flOT^TI HiTt HrC iiiiir-ii mm •Jffcit] Mr. Dak Gusufson October 11, 1994 Page 3 on the fine grained shore nulerials pnor to placing the riprap. This filter layer is intended to reduce erosion of the fine grained shore soils. We recornmeod a woven filter fabnc intended for this purpose and meeting the specifications of Nicolon 70^06 fabric. For this type of wall system. se%-eral condinons must be evaluated to determine the wall system geometry required so adequate lateral suppon is attained. Those conditions and minimum factors of safety we have considered are as follows; • Bearing Capacity Failure - Safety Factor ■ 2.0 • Base Sliding - Safety Factor *1.5 • Wall Overtunung - Safety Factor * 2.0 • Overall Slope Failure - Safety Factor * 1.5 • Geogrid Overstress - Safety Factor » 1.2 • Geogrid Pullout - Safety Factor = 1.5 Your proposed wall system has three general geometrical cross-sections. • Walls separated by relatively large distance with a slope upward away from the lower wall of 2.5:1 to 3:1 (horizontal:vertical). • Up to four terraced walls at spacings of as little as about 6' and an overall rise in elevation away from the shoreline of about 2.5:1 (horizontal:vertical), with backfill between individual walls relatively level. • Two-tiered wall system with relatively level grades between and above the walls. Adequate bearing capacity of the wall system will require replacement of all organic or soft soils within the area of the walls. This includes all soil materials which shifted as a result of the slope failure several years ago. For access to the planned construction atea, it appears that the e.\isting trees and shrubs along the shoreline will have to be removed. If they are, all roots should be grubbed and cleared from the area. We recommend observation of the excavation areas by an experienced soils engineer or technician prior to fill placement. Supporting earth materials beneath the wall system must be either firm, natural soil or compacted fill. The fill material should preferably be fine gravti with a maximum largest r 1 Mr. Dak Gustafson October 11, 1994 Page 4 partkle size of 2" and no more than 50% material finer than a #4 sieve or 3% finer tfun a #200 sieve. This type of material is free draining, exhibits very little shifting when frozen, and is easier to compact in confined spaces siKih as expected at this project site. We recommend placmg tfK granular fill in lifts no more than 6’m thickness with vibratory compactic,i of each lift. Care should be taken m choosing compacuen equ.pmem which has sufficient energy for effective compaction yet does not have e.xcessive energ>' or weight to cause significant shiftmg of the wall facing stones dunng the gnvcl compaction process. A porous gcotcxulc separauon fabric is recommended to separate the pravel fill from fine gramed native soils at surfaces where seepage from the soil iiuo the gravel can be c.xpectcd. This includes beneath the topsoil layer placed over the gravel. Our computations iiKlicatc the critical, or governing, factor for wall stability is lateral sliding of the retaining wall base. In order to attain the minimum recommended factor of safet>’, we recommend the following minimum depth (distance back from the back of the tacing stone) of g**'grid-reinforced gravel. WaU Hdglit (ft.) Depth of Reinforced Backfill Zone (ft.) Level Slo|X! Behind Wall 2.5:1 .Ma.\imum Slope Behind Wall •>2.6 3 4 4 4.5 6.8 6 6.8 10 I S S.9 - For wall heights between those listed above, you f\ interpolate in direct proportion to arrive at minimum reinforced backfill zone depths. We recommend using a geogrid at least equal ■*' the specifications of Tensar UX1500 (SR-2) uniaxial material for slope reinforcement. For at least some fastemng of the face stone to the reinforced backfill, we recommend extending tlie geoprid 8" to 9" into the stone course joints at the geogrid layer level. You should realize this connection relies only on the frictional resistance of movement between the stone and geogrid material. Thus, care should be taken when moving equipment or heavy objects near the facing stone, so the stoiK is not shifted or damaged. Mr. Dale Gustafson October 11. 1994 Page 5 The geogrids should be installed such that the along-the-roll-lencth direction is perpendicular to the wall face. Care should be taken to prevent wrinkles or slack in the geogrid layers. The amount of tace movement or bulging is dependent on minimizing the slack. To minimize slack, we recommend that the geogrid be pretensioned prior to backfilling. Pretensicning typically consists of layering the geogrid flat, pulling hand taut, anchonng with a two-prong metal fork, and then placing backfill material on top. Good drainage of the wall backfill is important for wall stability. We recommend a minimum 4" drainiile in the gravel backfill as you have showm on your plans furnished to us. Typical section details we recommend are attached. Our desi ’ >: > ‘commendations are based on certain assumptions regarding existing soil conditions, jjj order to v'erify our assumptions, we recommend that an experienced soils engineer or technician from AET be on site during construction to observe conditions. As a minimum, the engineer should observe base excavations, backfilling procedures, and geogrid installation. If you anticipate changes from our recommendations, please contact us so we can review the impact of those changes on our recommendations for this wall system. Report Prepared By;Report Reviewed By: Donovan K. Stormoe. PE Principal MN Reg. i? 10493 DKS/JCR.'sm Attachments I hereby earti-y tli3t thh plan,. or f«.*poit \‘/as prepared ay ir.o or un-icr my rv.'><ir.(is!co <nd phat 1 aaa a ea.’'/ sr^f^ci Pf«i.>soicoal Engineer unebr th^u'.vs^ ti.e Sim-'* O'. Mlnoi^aa. WHiTi/tw rC, r> DCl /O/f/if I _neg. No. 10403 gw»t»faon L«ar HvwtJvno* Ci6DQ4-5 I 3TONE. FACUN^ c HFf^tHT VAfsf/F^)94^)/O'* BATTER iTY P,') - RiP NAP Q3S DEPTHWAR/E^ WJTh\ WALL HEt/LtHT \ (SEE R \ /?£• INFORCED BAF KFILL 'EONE DRAl/>iTn.E -COMPACIF D F.RAVEL irm) F>E01E X FILE FILTER FAERIE SECTION I SUBJECT: RETAINING WALLS AND SHORE RROTECTiON RECOMMENDATIONS PROJECT:LEAR RESIDENCE ORONO, MINNESOTA A AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING. INC C0N9ULTAIfT9 • cfonxuNTaL • MATCVUIS • rMfmomftNTii JOn 94-1943 DATE: 10/11/94 DY: DKS PAGE 1 OF 3 CHECK jc; ED DY: R 05DQ4S94^ 935' W(l /O^ WALLC 'J )lOPSOfL (&>" rvuM 2'/VAX.\IERTIL/\LSPACINGroRLyf-OE^ID HEINhORCEO BACK TILL 'CONE. CEJLPIH VAR!EE> - E>EE HA ) TRAVEL BASE. CE07 E XT ILL. FILTER FABRIC HIP RAP SECTION Z SUBJECT; RETAINING WALLS AND SHORE PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS PROJECT: ~CEATrRESTT)ENCE~ ORONO, MINNESOTA A AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING. INC COWfUUAlOf . CtffltCItWICU • wiTcauia • CMVIROHatMUt ■ JOD // 94-1943 DATE: 10/11/94 F’AGE 2 OF 3 HY: DKS CHECKED nv: JCR 94-S REtNFONC'.LD BACk'HLL ZONE.S^fO /O^ BATTER (ryR^-T RIP HAP 93 e" Z' MAX. (TYP. ) URAINl/Lt. tTYR) Z.EOTE X TILE F/LTEK FABF/Z DEPTH VARIE'^ WITH WALL (1 Y P - SL E SCHEDULE ON P.^') 5EC f /a/y 3 SUBJECT: RETAINING WALLS AND SHORE PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS PROJECT:LEAR RESIDENCE ORONO, MINNESOTA 4 AMERICAN ENClNEEUINi; TESriNC,. INC COH5in.TAKT9 • OtOTtniMICAL • yimuis • omriJiuMytHTii JOD If 94-1943 DATE: 10/11/94 DY: DKS PACE 3 OF 3 CHECKED DY: ,,, r7CB^....- I HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zone : (CIRCLE cne ) 0-75’ 75-250' E xisting Harcccver in Zone 250-500' 500-1GCO' A. House LENGTH X . X _ X 3> Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk X £. pATl DEC! ATIO/ ECK r.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC she=j;n= X /W' G. Other WIDTH /O f.f / Total Hardcover in Zone Total P roperty A rea in Zone S.F. ^5 /5s S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S. ^ • S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Z Z *7__ S.F ^37 S.F.B 7 43I5I_ X100 a 2.^^ % 19 ^/S77Ay 6 JiARDCO'/£H CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK zcne : (CIRCLE cne ) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 5CO-10CO' Existing Hardcover in Zone A. House LENGTH WIDTH S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. X S.F. B. Garage c. Driveway ±/o io S.F. S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X X V3 S.F . S.F. E. Patio/ Deck F.Landscape areas UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING ^3 0 X J V3(C> S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone £11 S.F S.F S.F. Sl\ B 20 ^57^ X 100 - _^ CITY OF OROXO P.O. Bos 66 Cnstal Bav, MN 5532J 473-7357 TO; James Lear 2525 Dunwoody Avenue Wavzaia. MN 55391 ZONING FILE #1965 NOTICE OF n.ANNING COMMISSION ACTION OATF, OF NOTICE: September 22. 1994 COPIES: Gustafson Design 1845 Wisconsin Avenue North Golden Valley. MN 55427 Sha>*n Gustafson HonestrcK> Associates 2335 Highway 36 St. PauL MN 55113 e TYPE OF APPLICATION: Varia;ice/Conditional Use Permit I)\TE OK MEETINC: 09 19 94 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST The Planning Commission recommerals tte following: Tabled for reasons noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant to provide hardcviver inventory pertaining to the retaining walls and 0-75’ zone. 2. Applicant’s engineer to contact City Engineer (Shawn Gustafson. Bonestroo & Associates 636-4()00) and work out a mutually acceptable design. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the October 17 meeting is October 7. You will be notified by mail of the meeting date and time. If YOU desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available ' from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Plaiming Commission. Isv e K4TK1TTES OF THE ORONO PL.ANNING CONEMISSION ^ liELD ON SEPTEMBER 19. 1994 (#13) nXM'^** ■ avenue - VAl^i -n« Affitoit of Pupation aod Cenifica.e of Mailinsw^Tnotcd. AppUco. G.COO Hei^chWan. P..o. of^^ Chn.h, was pr«on.. 0. ..0n «a.ed .he ^'^h 1, asking to install a new ^ j residential area. This s.^ A conditional-use perm., is ^ MS sq ft The sign would exceed the drc two other „7^ft allowed, 45 sq ft proposed), site si^e square foouge f-'l:Vopo-<i:.. and the mavintun. heigh, abovesquare footage (2-^ ft auoweu . t < pade (9-inst^ftho sallowed) Hein^tv^he school to s^^^^ conW H the others, Sn^stn" Shoreline Dove which is commercial m character. _ . . _____A,.- onng ui^ .......- . ^ i-k a itprn ^#1964 as presented Ayes 4 ..———l^£^gjnoi:e4^Nolan seconded, to appreneo HF^\R1NG TTic iMTidavi. of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Applicant, lames Lear, and O^e Gustafson of Gus.afton Design were present. Gafiron stated the request is f°;,» ' retaining walls in lakeshore yard to repair a slu p ^ reviewed the newly submitted 'away. City En^neer reviewed the Lre is a histoiy of problems wath nlan The Engineer is concerned with boulder ^ Lear does not wish for tetyL failing. The plan is nor de.atled nor « ^ provtdingthe s^e Usre-type walls, P'“ the histo^ and mtegrity of his home Gnd of stability. Lear is also interest^ ,^cy of the new walls, while teceiGng a comfort leve vn ■ ^ • nHn detsil on landscspmg, Comntission members discussedne^ seconded, to table Item #1965. and the hardcover calculations. Peterson Ayes 4, Nays 0. r«7sx*i [•MW ri>v w* MlVfiHW [€»»i M«1«J VJ •IS94iM [SltWW Psl«]«JiM sme r«^vfsi r«7sT« rsiMW ^KsY«IW «?£«!• I ItfMV [•HW Mr. MiXe Gaffron September 27, 1994 Page 2 traffic safety standards. We reconnend that the applicants explore the possYbility of obtaining an eaeeoent for an alternate access T«. be noted for all the above variance applications that the It should b fhat the arolicant has a ♦•heavy burden of proofcourts have said that granting of a variance a?eYa?iS!L !s because a variance allows property to be used in a Banner forbidden by the ordinance. The Department should be advised of the action eieea within 10 days of final action and copies of the official and #1968 witni^n i office if the variance requests IrYnotYenUd pf^se contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. sincerely. Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist CCS/cds c: Lake Minnetonka files 27-133-11 and 27-133-23 TO: FROM: DATE: Chairman Schroeder and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator September 16, 1994 SUBJECT: #1965 James Lear, 2525 Dunwoi>dy Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Application: Request for vari.^ »:e and conditional use permit to construct retaining walls in lakeshore yard to repair a failinj; lakeshore bank. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property’ Owners List D - Survey E - Topography Map F - Sketch of Proposed Walls G - City Engineer's Comments II - Revised Plan (Rev’d 9/16/94) I - Cross Sections (Reev’d 9/16/94) J - Letters of Transmittal (Rev'd 9/16/94) Discussion Applicant is Gustafson Design on behalf of James Lear, the property owner. This property has a lakeshore bank rising approximately 20 ’ above the lake with a slope of around 50%. The bank is starting to experience a slump problem on the northerly half of the property. The applicant initially provided only a conceptual sketch for a wall system. City Engineer Shawn Gustafson requested much additional detail which was not submitted until midday on Friday, September 16th. Gustafson has not had a chance to comment in writing, but his indication to me at 1:15 p.m. today was that while the additional material provided is helptul, it does not appear to be an engineered designed, it appears to be a boulder wall, and he has severe reservations about recommending approval for boulder walls. The proposal does not provide any detail as to the amount of hardcover that will be added by the walls. A hardcover calculation should also be provided. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends tabling this item until the information submitted to the City Engineer has been reviewed and found acceptable by the Engineer. Planning Commission may want to give applicant conceptual direction in regards to the project. C> ch V W CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL L,YND USE APPLICATION PROPER-n-LOCATION lX<^vLICf£c!'1 ____L IdLnncion Numl« (P.I.D.) 2C 111 --------------------_ APPLICAN-*- ■ r _ Pho«(homc) V\A 3-> (i£^ferent than applicant) wAtJL>yZ Cit\’ /O'COWO PhcMK (home) ^7/*‘75/0 ^ Phone (work) 1 — *7^~ Zip Date Propcny Acquired --------^----------__^— . —;— ------------— I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels or land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - . . S 50.(X) For each variance request with CUP application ~ SI25.00 Residential Accessory Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ' SI75.00 Guest House/Guest .Apartments “ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg S250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use V $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplam Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more _ ^ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within /5 ’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule . $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee Si.e Plan Review (A con^iun. fees) S250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY . , Present Zoning District Present Use of Propeny Residential Other (specify). (month,'year) ilTt OF OFOsO jFhlCE i500:0:0000 CFtCK Ti ",V»feVV • vv » »*) It VV' • V'V .‘L'TfL'T^T ‘ « T f * t »•") nt I i y *» ^ i i ,UrV'Va 'W'A * 1 A • ') (T" / “ 4. ^ t 2. 3. 4 5 6 7 9. 10. Ce^^te of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer .o handout for survey ^ia^leeal description to application if not included on required surv-ey. ^^^piiic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve i*To?ihe leear^^i«l“<3= rnariul satus) of all persons with an interest in the oropert^ lids would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current ownet(s). ' ■ ■___if rcet Staff for requirements).properly. aprlrabl-* (sec staff for requirements). - L“Tn”dut » i^T;;^«hon. Piease aiuch a separate list of any other persons ^ ” vou U ish notified of this application. t'T-s Tz-v cT ’PPi ^0 rOPIES OF LzViiGE DOCUMENTS OK COP\ ^pminLOTON (11 X n" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMEVrS S^^.S (S^l^^dl require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to f. submitted.) Ipp'lt;atron rnoTcoL7=« StHbove Wolma.tn has’’no “ een included. Certiftcation by Clerical Department that Und Use Application is complete._____________ Initials of Clerical Staff:.-------------------------------------- _i iiit'i <1 ml TVir’“f nri^'^ »»***..• August 26.1 994 A I i i // —'J T;V gustafsdifr c^ig^ li^ City of Orono Department of Planrwig & Zoning P.O Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Dear City Officials: We are requesting a variance for the Lear Residence at 2525 Dunwoody Avenue to do the following work; Install rip rap along the existing shoreline within the given spr.cifications of the City and DNR. Replace existing retaining walls on the hillside and add new watts to retain the hillside where it currently is eroding and sliding toward the lake Grade in the work area to accommodate the construction of the walls, but not to make substantial changes in existing grade Install plantings and erosion control materials in place of sod that is eroding and sliding toward the lake 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley. MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 HtmrW^m»*OIT® 98/Zi/n■•■•IV’ * *t ', BATCH OOS7* • - ••-ir^- ■«K» AOW ,5 OfCR HA« t TAXPAYER jWfUMI/AOO*wwp A«»> r Olf€t HAW TAXPAYCi - ifS . NAW/AOCMI.> »>ku^OMCR NAWtaxpayer M____ iVUfeTWAYER ^^’hame/aoor'M v ^ OU'V^PROP ADOR ■* i4 0»*«R MAHC I <V Taxpayer ^je^NAME/AOOR •w, sa n-iir-z% n 0002 02A40 pmtWICY AVC KfMTT C oomit MNNiTT C DQM€V 2A7S SHAOTHOOO tO CKCELSIM W 55S51sa fa-iiT-2i zi0EA70 Oif«DODt iVf HAtXA IUI5A lUECK HAJIXA LUISA LUECKE470 Duaaxm aveMYZATA HN SSXflin 00X0AVIsa E0-I17-XS otsxo GALE HILL GALE MILLxsxo DuracoDY ivMAYZATA m iSSYl sa X0-11/-E5 II 0010 oisao OlfMXSOY iVE JAG MAruS JOHN A NAFU5 isao oifa«)OY ave HAYZATA HN 553Yli 30 10-117-13 a 0031 01505 omaoooY ave EONEST C OLANCHAMO ETAL EMNEST C OLANCHARO 1565 DUNNOOOY AVE HAYZATA m 553Y1 36 I0-117-X3 II 0014 0H65 01M«)ODY AVE H R HICKEY A 0 G MICKEY N 9 MICKEY I 0 A MICKEY 1465 DUNNOOOY AVE HAYZATA HN 55391 I. MEIRCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IMPOWIATKM SYSTtH PROPtlTY OHTCRS LISTM J0-UT-J5 El 0005 OEOtO 0J»0«}O0Y AVE 0 C MORAN • r A MENOr BAVlD 6 MORAN A TRACY HENBT ;a90 OIPROOOV AVE MAYZATA m S55T1SO ZO-U7-Z5 n eeoB eooio AocREr>s unassignerLAMRENCE T MCNOCRSON LAMRENCE T MENDCRSON Z4AA OIPORXXY AVE MAYZATA m »55*\58 ZO-117-Z5 n eozi02S40 AfffVXieY AVE PNUTE J N0R6AR0 ETAL KNUrt J NORCARD ZSAt WJMHOOOY AVE MAYZATA ft4 55551 M tO-117-ZS 21 0050 0Z5A5 OLPORXWY AVf N A HULTCREN AON NULTCREN MILLIAH MULTCREN 2545 0UTO4O00Y AVf MAYZATA TW 55541 S« 20-117-25 22 0014 02475 OJfMXO't AVE J A A S L PONERS DAVID 0 a VICKI R VXCKERHAN 2A25 LYOIARO CIR EXCELSIOR 55531 58 20-117-25 22 0017 02505 OUt84QOOY AVE JAMES S NOROLIE ET At JAMES S NOROLIE 2505 OUNHOOOY AVE MAYZATA m 55341 *• « «•. -m,nPORT NO. PX4554Q1PA6I BSi 28-117-2S 21 0004 02474 PUTRIOOOT AVf AUDREY 8 06LAN0 AUDREY 0 ODLANO 2474 OLPDCOOY AVE MAYZATA m 5554150 20-117-tS 21 001402500 DU8RWDY AVf TIMOTHY J OCUND TIMOTNV J OeiANO 2500 CL»8«00T AVf HA>ZATA »0« 55541SO 20-117-2S 21 002S 02540 OUlORWOY AVE M A RAATZ ANA KAATZ MICHAEL A a NAN A RAATZ 2540 OU»MOOOY AVE S MAYZATA MM 55541 58 20-117-25 21 0051 02545 DUNNtXJOV AVf H L BltlRE ACM BIELRE MARREN L/CHRISTXNC H 8IELKE 2545 DUrHOOOY AVE MAYZATA MN S5S41 58 20-117-25 22 0015 02477 DUM4 oOOY AVE J A a S L PONERS MILLIAM P I GEORCETTA HICKEY 2477 OCPORXWY AVE MAYZATA m 55541 Y.T»-^ k ‘ • • f •• ’H-*! ® ■1. « ■ VV ’ • T-.1 i ; 1:.* . 58 20-117-25 22 0018 02525 DimXlOY AVE J H LEAR t 8 L LEAR JAMES H LEAR 2525 DUNNOOOY AVE HAYZATA 7M 55S41 . •. i' ‘ ■ i. rv-’% ' -'fr ’ ■! Jf-%'ll*4\4 MM OATIiMTCN 90SMOT A9MtA'JAXOArt* NAHE/AOtWJSMS SO to-nr-is t* oos*02M1 CA9CO PCXHT RO ORuce j MfeotoH tr ii. i«xe j t€ooioM ttmCMOC J CltNC-MCBOtOn 2*01 CASCO ROIHT HO MAVZATA ft< SSSfl 'I 'lii... >r‘ r I r 5-* ^4* ‘ iiv' ■ MCI««RI(« COUNTT MWRttTY I»ff!3««ITl!BI STSTtl*iwry CMCRS LIST WRORT MO. RtASOAOl RASf A ■ \ii fr .*> •TOTti tATCN V ** *• - istc .•'■■ ■ ■■•? I’!’s.rjfs^\■*‘i<CJ '. i-‘.i'' *s N'W I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RERRESEMTCO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TiMS RfR»ISENTAT10f4 OF INTOWUTION AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE MENMERIN COUNTY DERARTNENT OF RRORfRTV TAXATION* TO THE OCST or HV KNOMLEO&E and OCLIEF».T.«kte ,/MLtdiMLk.••-4; - '■ 'fliH'. ? J' lsr, * V -Sr h • V ’ ^ #1965 X>/mmr fm’#»r 0 jh'm:x!Pf «•**4% TJTT'^*^y r~. -V. ■Ss. • vv<;v' > »-N 'iV .» ■'vN *' •*-'■•■» *‘. w,'/ v.-v '\‘cr^*‘ * •••. ».< V » 'f Si /a ‘••JvvNX?* rg02 •*«% • ••* . - 4 * a!' ih«» « - t f.i!«1}i 9 i I I I K •10frtG #f , , «*««.• • • Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects A ^ • XnPpr C Artar^i ^ Marvel I tetV4M ^ f T\jrr«H G^nr- f C i^f T»iofnai f Snap' ^ Wwn M Ettv^ C Car>^kMBrt A IkerWi ^ «re*^ A C mhwvs ff 8k'^^ ^ Af [?.«ta^ O UJsACW Wnt<^ C •w«i*A. A I • • >Aa rw n ■ •fciTAanrv rt M ft t Af«mor> a a OenjB C **xy»iAs A k^Kk Af ^ Af AdThnee Pf ftAH;''JP^ P %M At Aonn M ftm% A iC ^ TAnr^ W ^n'san Pf C if'vP' Pf ernrs t Uoantr Pf Jr»^ C" Pf kc« j Ariinfsr* Pf ft!I ■WIT P Asdft*AOi^ Pf I Ml Pf Mart A pf Garv lA' Pf PtM J uarext'' A A Oartr ; f Ji|p»«n PI A art k«v««ft PC PNftp i C 4Stn^ Pf M«« V ^mk pf Pt w p^iiwp sji«rr« Pf L ^ Pf Gary D ftjnac PB Pf f 1M0 Hmr^ Pf ftr«^ ft Pf OxMP* ' ap ’^A Pf k^JM^ D CA.Si#lPiA Pf Cf^iO OtwrPr Pf Pna G Hpuvi Pf J0»w P C«»r Pf Ch^artrs a l^k^ir UfD M PaM«At> Hanar M Ckwr iarnrs f f mji«>aNdl StP i ^ ,.w pu '*' SeptcmbtT 9, 1994 Mr Michael P. Gaftron, Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Olficc 66 Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 Re; Ixar Residence File No. 139-1%5 Dear Mike. \Vc have resiewed the propi>sal to replace existing retaining walls and riprap along the shoreline of Spring Park Bay on the Uar residence at 2525 Dunwtxnly Avenue. The informatum submitted is mcornplcte and unacceptable l^hc City should not continue a review of this application until a plan has been prepared by a Registered Engineer. Information which is critical for this type of project includes. - type of wall proposed - method of priwiding drainage for walls - method of tic-back restraint for wall - geotechnical evaluation and'or type of fill proposed - cross section of proposed wall and side slopes - loading condition used for wall design . indication as to which of the existing trees will be savxd - description of the construction technique proptised tor working around the mature trees and riH>t systems in the area We would recommend a modular masrmry block wall be used for the improvements. manufacturers which provide an engineered wall system tor almost any application, ibe wall should have a draintilc line installed to function properly in clay soils. ,w„ a.f,i,-,.trv in Wc do not recommend gravity type retaining walks, such as boulder walls, due ( ty determining their effectiveness or durability. Wc do not recommend timber retaining wa s as permanent scMution. Please coniact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK ASSOCIATES. INC. 0 Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 • • % tiit ] fKhttng#1«vttlon fit proposed eJevetlon gustefson dssign, Inc.Lear Residence 2525 Dunwoody Ave. Orono, MN Scale: 11nch - 10 feet September 15,1994 Cro## 6ect2cfis of m^d GrBd^ iesr te^id&^ce 2525 Puwx)^ Avs. 1 1nch s 16 feet \ \ N ' / ✓\ \ ' T✓ ✓ ✓ \ \ Gr«v«« j«oqr«] at p«r Rnrard Bouidars DrainTtl# / / /\ \ \ X' ■ Compactad Grava* Fi Typical Wall Section r T.| 13 gustafson design Inc. September 16,1994 Mr. Mike Gaffron Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Bex 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Attached are the supplemental materials needed for the Lear variance. I have worked out the requested details of the wall and drainage system for the proposed project. I have faxed copies of the wall detail to Shawn Gustafson for verification, Thank you for your help with this request, Sirvid rely, Dale A. Gustafson end. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 i 5- -Tjji gustafson design Inc. 0^ ZmM September 16,1994 Mr. Shawn Gustafson, P.E. Booestroo Rosene ArxJeriik & Associates 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul, MN55113 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Attached are the supplemental materials needed for the Lear variance. I have worked out tt« reguested details of the wall and drainaj^ system for the proposed project 1 have delivered copies of the wall detail to the city of Orono and I have mailed hard copies to your office. Thank you for your help with this request Stf Bly. Dale A. Gustafson end. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley. MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 xiaiaa o c b Existing Lawn ^ lx Rag ^ . '.r •\- i - W' ' • 3/ Griy Tt<i^*Qged DogwxxxJ Itocopiri Ptrm Tree 5/Shihor Sprea A gustafson design, inc. *• ■• •<■• itr f r »M *rt Lost Raskknc« 2525 Dunwocx^ Ava. Oran. K?' Sc«l® 1 nch • 16 October 14, 1994 To: From: Date: SubjecI: Note: Chairman Schri^eUcr and Or<>no Planmi^ C^>mmts?ion Mcmbens Ron Mot'fsc. City Admini'^trator Nttchael P Gaflnm. Assi‘*tant Planning Sl /oninc Administrator October 13. 1994 #1%7 Robert S. Olson. K-P Properties. IrK*., 4645 Baysidc Road - Preliminary Plat Approval - Referral from City Council Planning Ccmimission reviewed this item (m September 19 atKl at applicant ’s request recommended denial to move it along to the Council Cinincil reviewed the item on (Xtober 10 and referred it back to Plannim: Commissnm 1 I ist of Fxhihits A B C I Revised Plat Drawings Including Gcffre Propeny Council Action Notice 10'13/94 Planning Commission Minutes 9/19/94 .. lOi'O-t A* Pnfiv*T«»—cy Memos and l:\hibits of 10 6/94 and 9/15 94 A|)plicaiion Backgrmiiid At your September meeting. Planning Coimnission reviewed a proposed subdivision to split off the Olson residence from the remaining 14 acres, leaving the large parcel as an ouilot, plus two additional remainder outlots. (>ne for a private ro.id and the other tor eventual acquisition by the neighbor. Ihis pri'posal lacked a continuous road outlot corridor Irom Bayside Road to the large outlot parcel, since the neighboring Geffre propeny had not been included in the plat. I'urther. septic testing had not been submitted for the existing Olson residence with a failing system. Planning Commission offered the applicant tabling until information is ci>mp!cte. The applicant requested a denial recommendation in order to move the application along to the Council. Planning Commission recommended denial, and recommended applicant work with staff to come up with an acceptable propo.sal and provide all necessaiy intomiaiion prior to Council review, After Planning Commission review, staff met w ith applicants and recommended again that the Geffre property be included in the subdivision. At that point, applicants did not have Geffre's approval to include him in the plat. Applicants submitted to Council a proposal including a triangular easement over Geffre’s pri'periy to provide the continuous future road outlot connection to the large outlot. At their October 10 meeting. Council and City Attorney raised questions regarding the easement vs. outlot issue and directed that Planning Commission further review^ this, with input from the City Attorney regarding acceptability of the easement. Zt>ning Fik #1%7 CX'tobcr 13. 19^ Pace 2 Shortly after tlw Council meeting, Jippikants ncnified staff that they would! include the Geffre prc^rty and submit with an outlet per staffs recommendation (sec Exhibit A). .Additional Information An ;^'ceptabk on-site sewage treaimeni site evaluation report has been received, indicating primary and alternate sites for immediate and future use on the Olson property. Since inclusion of the Geffre property is furKtionally a lot liiw rearrangement that provides him more propeny potentially suitable for future septic use without removing any existing septic capability, no septic testing has been required for the Geffre property. Acreages for each parcel are as follow's: Total Area « 17.49 acres Lot 1, Block 1 (Olson)2.75 ac Uvt 1. BhK'k 2 (Geffre)1.94 ac Outlot A 0.28 ac Outlot B (future road)0.32 ac Outlot C (for future 14.13 ac development) Outlot D ( future road)0.07 ac With the current proposal per stafTs recommendation, the easement vs. outlot issue is eliminated. Ilowevei. Geffre's lot is (temporarily) reduced from 2.01 acres to 1.94 acres, lie w ill retain ownership of the 0.07 acre Outlot D, but will in effect “trade" Outlot D for Outlet A if the B-D corridor is used in developing Outlot C (in which case Geffre ends up with 2.22 acres). It may be appropriate that the agreement between the 3 parties be mcxlified to apply to "heirs and assigns" in the event that one of the parties sells their property. The City Attorney has been asked to review the agreement. Because the 14 acres is to be platted as an outlot for future development, construction of a road is not required until development of that parcel. The current plan still leaves the applicants the option ot developing a new roadway through the adjacent White properly, although applicants note the potential for acquiring that property appears to be poor at this lime. Zoning l ik #1967 Octo6cr 13. 1994 Page 3 • Per the CtHiray Public Worts rcqv«rsi anJ past City practice, if OutU>t B is e>cntiully used for road purps^cs, thenNnh the Olson and Geffre residences will be re^ulred to rciTKne their Bassidc Rtud a^cevyrs and ci'a^truct new jcce>scs to the iHitlot nxKl. This raises the mjcsium as to Ik ^w or whether the OI sshi residence will be able to access fr>Mn an interK>r road if Outlet B is never used and the 14 acre parcel is developed using access from the White property Since Olssm's cxisiing dnvewav is at what the CiHiniy consyers a safe hvation. perh.ips this continued access wi.Hild be accef^blc • K P Pnperties' IXin PcterHin has advised it is their intent to initiate subdivision of the 14 acres (using Outlets B and 1) ter access) as soon as septic testing is complete... Staff Kecommendation Staff recommends approval of the applicant's current proposal subjt'ct to the hallowing comliiions: 1 3. 4. 5. Outlois A, H. and C shall remain in omimon ownership until Outlet C is further developed. Outlet D shall remain in ownership with U>t 1, Block 2 urtil Outlet C is further developed. Outlet A is considered as an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon development of Outlet C. Outlet A shall be either combined w ith Outlet B and Lot 1. BIiKk 1 if Outlets B and D are not used for road purposes, or Outlet A shall be legally combined with l^t 1. Block 2. in the event that Outlets B and D are used for roadway purposes. Outlets B and D are platted for future roadway purposes and shall remain as separate unbuildable tax parcels until such time that Outlet D is lunher developed. In the event that Outlet C is further developed without a need tor use of Outlets B and 1) as roadway access, then Outlets B and D must be legally combined with adjacent properties. Outlet C is created for future development only, and no building permits shall be issued for Outlet C until such time that it is replattcd into one or more huildablc lots. In the event that Outlets B and D are used as an access road serving a future development in Outlet C. the residences on Lot 1. Block 1 and Lot 1. BU)ck 2 shall rev ise their driveway locations onto said ouilot roadway and eliminate direct access to Bavside Road. Zixiing File f 19f>7 Oclohet 13. \994 Page 4 A dnvewiy easctnciM o%cr Outloi B shall be grinted in fa\-or of Loi 1 for corainucil use of the existing driveway in Outlol B. The pla! is subject to the standard perimeter drairufe and utility casements a.No additional right-of-way for Ctxinfy Road 84 w ill he granted although Hennepin CtHjnty has requested it. At the time Outlet C is further dcveK>ped. the City will at that time require payment of park ikdkation fees and the dedication of all necessary and appropriate public easements within Outlots A. H. C and D. The Olson pr*>perty shall be provided with a new septic system within the time frame and requirements of the City cixk Options for Action I Recommend approval as noted ab»^ve Table for more infonnation 3. Recommend denial, stating rea.sons Other. _____slM Cn'Y OK ORONO T».0. Bos 66 Crystal Bay. MN 473-7357 \riM K VnON NO, #1^7 NO IICK OK COtNClL ACTION l>alf of Notice: October 14. 19Q4 TO:K-P Pri>rcnies, Inc. [KMuki R PeterM>n. PrcsiJcni 12435 42nd Avenue North Plvmouih. MN 55441 COPIES: Roben S Olsi^n 4b45 BaNsidc Road Maple Plain. MN 55359 Irv in Gettre 4t>65 Bayswlc Road Maple Plain. MN 55359 r\ PE OF APPI.ICAI ION: Preliminary Subdivision DATE OK MKEI LNC: October 10. 1994 \OTK: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST COl NC II, ACTION • MOTION: Referred bKk lo Pl-umine Commission for further review. This item is seheduk-d twfore the »= Commission on'Monday. Oc.olKr 17, 1994 The meenns starts a. 7:tX) p m.. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 19, 1W4 r mlnutes of the orono pl\nnlng commission ^^EETTNG HELD ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1994 (#3) Ucm # 1967- D. Pctersoa Gtrflic - Cor tinued Cat^n St ucd property is located South of Bas-side Road. East of County Road 19 The t4ial request v.as invoK-ing six lots to include the GetTre and Olson properties A^HcaVt's have been uorkingurth stall on this project. The Cits-'s two pnmao'goals Wn to c«te suitable access locations and dtamfields that would meet the 6% slope 1^ for mound systems At this point, applicant wishes to separate the GeHre residwce ^ the applicatioa split oft'the Olson house from their 17.5 acre pared, so ,t ^ sold deii,™« the remainder of the Olson propeity as Outlet A to be platted later. Ifthis is done the Cits- would need to alresmct Outlet A to be created for future development oX bireqmre Park Dedication Fees due when Outlet A is platted, f f plMinK of Olson property to corudrm to the lot width, area, and ^back standards of the ^-IB Zomng District ITte developer is amiapatmg submittal of a four or five p laler this year. The aoplicani submitted a revision stating the simple lot division would not allow a cur^ fine T?r^D-mor created a new outlet for a ftmire dnveway. D Peterson said notice^ line. The •> ,i„. five-lot division This drawing is to show the CiW what Ihe^cuuenTp'a^rare'for splitting ofl‘the house The revision changed the 30’ setback ftom the deck to *>0' Copies of this revision were handed out to C ommission mem ers ^ an outlet which would be unbuildable without a plat, smith asked if this would be sei.ing a precedent, f Dormoily approve only an outlet that has an Outlot A deeded Geffire to be less than two acres and theretore, ^K-division oicturc To gain fust to Geffle. Gaflron said this onlv makes ^ m ^.g sub-th^mr. p^ the easement that the Geffre lot would provide. ^ ° be properties under eonsiderauon is f sale would fall through, and asked done before the next meeting but, meanwnije, IT .mv movp this matter ?ot^ ::7e ct-'ctut“ Z^“er.h::::^ r^ "ara^tcern^^^^ -u.d need conditions attached to it. XtINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNflSSION meeting held on SEPTEMBER 19. 1994 (03) Item #1967 - D Pctcnoo/Gcf&c - Continued Peterson mo^xd. Smith seconded, to deny the application #1967. Ayts B-Peterson, Smith. Berg, Nays 1-Nolan. “ —point road - apti V the-kvct VARIANCES - PLBUC HEARING / The Affi<h>-it of PubUcati^od Certificate of hMing were no^ The applicant waa not present Smith noted applicS assumed the item » as bemg t^eled at his prior request It teas moved by Peterson, seconi^by Berg, to table l.em»lS95 for revrew a. the October 17 meeting. Ayes 4, NaystX / TO 4 vu' wr^w'^f/JOAN M. HARMON, 4100 WAIERTOW^N - CONT.NU.CTION OT PUBLIC HEARING \ y/ The rMfidavu of Publication and CertificateNlaifing were noted. Gat&on noted the applicants ctiomey had requested tabling. u „as moved by Peterson, seconded bXto>e.,™.^ -o the October ,7. 1994 meeting of the Planning Commi^n. Aycs4.r.a>s . ,«6) nXM KI953 - wnXLAM ^/eN. ^5 U AVENUE - VARlANCtlS-CONTIMTAl ION Ot PUBLIC ' Tlte Affidavit of Publication an/Certficate of Mailing wXy noted Mr. .Allen was present Item #1953 was tabled tram last been teceived Thts pr^salis for an adrhnon ^ f betw«n this addition^d the garage would be only 3+ tt where ^ Applicant is asldng^a side requiredVjnce the property ^rn'o"t.mL“raI lot covem^ variance ts regu!>ed since the property meets the 1500 Jft allowed per code 10.03 subdrvtston C. A , r.C . p f RKQl KSr FOR i Ol-NClL ACTION DATK: October 6, 19^)4 ITFM NO.: / / Department Approval: Name MuhacI P G.iffron Title A»s» Planning: & Zoning Adrmnistraiw \ffminiNlralor Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zonm: Itmli^iption: #1%7 Ri>bert S. Olson K-P Pn>reo»e5 Inc . 4645 Baysidc Road - Preliminary Plat Approval • Resolution Zoning District: RR-IB. Single Family Rural Residential. 2 acre. Application: Request to split ff a 2.75 acre lot with existing residence from 17.5 acre parcel List of Exhibits A - Preliminary Plat Drawings Received 10 6/94 B - Staff Sketch C - Development Agreement with .Neighboring Property OwiKr D - Resolution H - Planning Commission Action Notice 9/26/94 F - Planning Commission Minutes 9/19/94 G - Hennepin Public Works Ix'Uer 9/16 94 II - Memo and Exhibits of 9/15/94 Pertinent Facts 1.Total area »= 17.49 ac. Proposed: Lot I Outlot A Oullot B Outlet C 2.75 ac. 0.28 ac. 0.32 ac. (future road> 14.13 ac. (for future development) Proposed Lot 1 w ith existing residence meets all arca/width/setback requirements. The cxisline residence has a failing septic system which is intended to be replaced Applicants have submitted preliminary site evaluation data indicating that primary and alternate mound sites are available tor the immediate replacement and tuture use. Remjcst for CiHincil Action continucU page 2 of 5 October 6. 1994 Zoning File #1967 Application Background Applicants had initially included tlie adjacent Irvin Getfre property at 4665 Bayside in a profx>sed plat to create five new building sites. Applicants worked with staff regarding road layout and septic retjuiremenis for that proposal and concluded that only four new lots would be possible. Concurrently. K-P Properties has been attempting to acquire the Fred and David White acreage to the immediate west, but have been unsuccessful to-date, although such ? transaction is still being pursued. Rather than proceed with the four lot subdivision, just prior to the Planning Commission meeting plicants revised the proposal to merely splitting off the Olson residence and leaving the remaining Olson acreage for development later this year or early next year. Applicants consulted with staff to accomplish such a subdivision that would not leave the remaining acreage landlocked, and which would result in the e.xisting residetKc requiring no variances regardless of whether a future subdivision iKcurs. Planning Commission Denial Recommendation Planning Comtnis.don reviewed the conceptual information provided by the applican- and staff s concerns (see memt> ot 9M5/94). Given the lack of septic testing and only having conceptual sketches rather than the formal survey work to review. Planning Commission ottered applicant tabling or denial. Applicant requested a denial in order to move this along to the Council since Mr. Olson and the buver of his house wish to close on the property as soon as possible. Planning Commission suggested that applicant work with staff to prepare a subdivision plan tor presentation to Council Outlots Intended for Future Development Staff advised applicants tliat spliumg off the res idence lot must not leave the remaining acreage landlocked. Potential access to the remaining 14 acres is through Lot 1 or from Bayside through While's property, which applicants don't control. 1 Request I'ot Council Action continued page 3 of 5 October 6, Zoning File #1967________________ Staffs recommended Si'lution was to create a private road cnithM (Outh'-t B) in the p^>tential ri\id IcKation through IxH I. This also left a small parcel (Outk^ A) adjacent to the Gcffre propeny. which wtiuld be combined with Get Ire's residence parcel if Outlot H was indeed used as a road right of way in ifte fumre. Olstm’s remaining 14 acres is designated as Outlot C with the understanding that it may mst be developed for even one single family resideiKC without future City approval. This delays the payment of park fees for the 14 acres until it is further deseloped. Staff funher recommended that the Geffrc property be included in the plat (see lixhibit B) and a triangular outkit matching a pre-existing access easement be platted to provide a complete outlot connection from Bayside Road to Outlot (' Applicants proptised plat diverges from this rccoiiinicndation by omitting Geffre from the sulidivision, and proposes the City s acceptance of a development agrtTinent between Olson, K*P Properties, and Gcffre (see Exhibit C). Geffre Property - Easement vs. Outlot Tlic aereement (Exhibit C) indicates that if Outlot C is replaitcd to buildable lots and Outlot B is used for a road, then Geffrc will receise Outlot A in exchange for becoming a part of iluu future plat and creating a triangular outU>t to complete the road connection through the southeast corner of Getfre's property. Conversely, if the White pri>perty is acquired and a future road access to Bayside is developed not using Outlot B. then Geffres involvement would be unnecessary and both O tiot A and B would revert back to the Olson property and be combined as part ot Lot 1. Perhaps the only negative impact if this occurred wimld be that the Olson residence would likely expect to continue accessing directly to Bayside Road rather than being served by a future interior roadway. That would be an issue for discussion and a potential variance it the full multiple-lot plat was before you m'w (see 9/15/94 memo Exhibit F). One additional quirk: The agreement discusses replaiting Outlot C into "buildable parcels and could be construed as not anticipating Outlot C being replailed as a single buildable lot. In the ca.se of replatting Outlot C into a single buildable lot or requesting City approval tor same, stall miuht argue that the addition of Outlet A and subtraction of a triangular load outlet trom Getfre’s property yield m effect a tliice lot plat which should be sc ved by a pro ate road tmto which the Olson residence, the Geffre residence, and the new. lot must access. Akematisc y. it could be considered as merely a lot line rearrangemen betw een Get Ire and Olson, and the creation of a private driveway outlot to serve the large parcel 'o the rear. Tliis inieqirelation would be left lo Council. RcqucM for O^jikiI Actk^r corairaieU page 4 of 5 Ocuibcr 6. Zoning File #l%7 flcnncpin Public Uorks DcparfnU'nl Conimtnts Hennepin DOT has indicated ajsproval of Outloi B as an access location. They also request additional right of-wav to total 40' from the ccnierliiw of Bavside Road. It would be inconsistent with past City practice to require this on Dayside Road which is defined in the Comprehensive Plan as a ‘’collecter" street requiring only 30-33 ’ either side of centerline. Staff recommends no additioDal right-of-way be required at this time. Stimmarv of Issues Will Council accept the agreement in lieu of including Gelfre’s property in the plat to create a continuous access outlet corridor to Outlet C? 2.Will CourKil accept the concept of making the remaining 14 acres an outlot with no development (not even one house) allowed until it is replatted or granted individual buildability in the future\> Council may w ish to confirm applicatit's intent for priKeeding with replatting Outlot C in the ne.xi year with or without the White property. Options for Action 1. Approve per the findings and conditions of the preliminary plat approval resolution attached. Refer back to Planning Commission for funher review ’. 3. 4. 5. Direct staff to draft a resolution of denial, stating reasons Table, requesting funher information (specify) Other. Staff Recommendation In recognition of Planning Commission ’s intent in recommending denial, stalf has prepared a resolution for nreliminary plat approval incorporating applicant’s proposed preliminary plat and agreement as presented. While staff would prefer the inclusion of the Geffre property to create a complete outlot corridor to CXitlot C. ine agreement appears to eliminate foreseeable access issues as long as its term "replatted into buildable parcels" can be construed as including the mere revision of Outlet C to single buildable lot status. If not, then language of the agreement should be revised to do si). or the Geffre property should be included in the plat and the triangular outlot created. r 1 Request for CiXincil Action cx>niimicd page 5 of 5 Octo^er 6. 1994 Zt>ning Fik #l%7 _____________ COUNCII. ACTION REQUESTKD: Take action to a|^ve. condiiiorully approve, deny or table. *>r refer applkalum to IMannmg Commission for further review I .S-. ^ / eh /<r* .«n f,, % ► . ^ *f i ^ r > ^ V' ficALC §4 rm ==T= * i \ • V 100 <^111 ur ^ __ •____________________^ r,o 8*.• z 100 ; y.« . , i'••'.» • . r* < /• « 200 ). ADDITION lENNEPIN . • t I. LOL SURVEYS.COMPANY^ INC. LAND SURVEYORS * 4 i Uff * I ^ • .5 .ti. ■ JR..,: fMtct fel. 19mA r.t. ^— Seal# I* • toa’ • «r*» • .. • •• •■.{• " ' t - 9 Prg^rVts lad. U€B tlad i«c HU &S44I €79«Sn7 I Aftnfa#: Ddii Ntl^iaH SHI iarti SHve QHm iMfiatj. Itt SSlfl «7§'S117 Oata W, llHaa ^rgpartd if! Lat Wwfi Ca.» liic. 7901 7W 9va. • iraatlya 9art. m SS4?0 MO-109} CNfitr; ftsH^ert S. and llv^arct M. 01soa U4S MfSlM laaO Oraaa. M Qascriptlaa: lat 1. itact I, tMTfnw rmG coafity af Meaaaffa. 99 u/bject ta tasaaaats of racard T®<o» 4rto »7 4f Acrti Taiai laMnaof of Lott I Total Kfoiaav of OaMaH S Loi attot Lot 1 2 T9 aeftii Ootlaf A 0 2i Aertt? Omiot i 0 12 Acfott OuMol C 14 13 Acrot* Oo<)noetr0 aot«o»«4 f I Acrot- All dUtAaccs ore approoiaate anO aaOjact ta cAaiifo oa flaal plat Tapayrappy frm - CUy of Oroao Hator sofply - Hall *♦, *ir Q ' Ik v»**- ^liov = ^!- ifii4- ,o•n- r o: f^ar, {’N{ I Hereby certify tHet thli flit prepared by ao or under mf direct superelsloa and that I oa a duly registered land surveyor under tba taws of the State of Hinnasota Dated this 25th day of Aufust. 1994 6i5 ... j 4,7^,! r .' /( 1—-§A- -r w ^ I 1 *■ *• f X / \\ f » /' y .1^ y - V'S 7 -<x\ i » V X X X ► ^ X x' X SCALE g^ FfET j 0 bQ ioo v7 \ ! l/f: t/i \i iM r »■. XXa »l ;':•*? • s^mI ■ i'l I \h'i' V.\ \\ \ \ V . n kVK X .w'.AX'-x-'r ■\' A '•.> \X N / / /X^'X'X'S \n\' A/-. --a X'' y /' ] yi^/'/X-A /I • • V "x K \7\7V, X v\1 \ SffiFFS Tt> AfPt/ CAAir f27.7V I ‘V.r- -!o k a <;ri :im» NT Rohm S ■^1 Ntojaict W fc« of»i»cr« of I 2. Hlmk I. 1 afmt and K I' p«frl».i»rr «*f •»««l hcrehy agtte lh»« lii lh« r.t«i .h.M pH.om i4 l et 2. Block I. B«,mc« I mmt .h^mn a, n«llni ( «H» tb* I ^ll•Nl A •» irplailctl into huililahle paicelc and a roadway t« dedicated Of fCMf.cd niltuH thii |>oflit*fi .d lot 2. Block I. Batiicw I aimf which IS sfKo.n a- ‘ Hiilof B on allachcd f ^hih.t A. then the idwoe named paet.es hctchv -cm, to deed to i.f.n T Cieflte and Marjone I Oeffie that L„ofl ,d I.H 2. BI.Kk I. Bayiicw I arms shown at tlwtlot A on attached rth.Nt A mwi a iHiflion .d t hit lot T a. shown on I ithihtt A fw.nmktl hy a lint dc5cnt>ed a, follows lUfooon* the Notthwestclc corucr of I o, 2- I. Bavview (•ums which is also the So.iihwesiefis cofiier of lot I. Block I. Baysivw I at ms. Ninth H » 4V tai- I d.staucc I IK fee,, theme S 00 1^* (hr f- distance 101 on feet theme K K't 4V n«- W distance I *H leet. tlwme Noilartly donf the west line of lot 2. Block I. Baysiew I anus to ,Ih |m.m o| |ie».nmi., -ml there f loin I Geffic ami \lif|o,ic I Grff.e as a con si delation lot micIi coiiiiuilineat ,o deed fiiliue H«llot A and ^ * ‘'“"l l u to, ..t.Mto, .n,l ........ pl.t of l„„l, ,1.|, ,.»|..t> «to.l. ,.,o,n..c, ,0.1, ........ .« ,c~...lioo ol O.olo, It o, to Ootlol <- a, ^tiimn on aUticlufl I ^hil'if A Signed ^ I'il'>'»l I ce o^^ncT^ I'f 2, MU kIi I Hav^iew I aini!i Miup.'uct Ohmi pufiliast! <»f l-<'t lUmk I, raiius - 1 • |uc5iilciit l><Mi;ih1 U TrUiMMi ----J livin r. Gel lie Mnrjoric l.^tlcMic Ice owners ^ ItayviiMv Infill^ A RKSOIXTION CJRANTINC; l‘RKUMINARV APPRO% A!. FOR A PLAT A1 4645 BAYSIDK ROAD . FILL NO. 1967 WIIFRFAS, Robert S Olson of 4645 Bayside Road and K P Properties Inc. represented bv Donald R Peterson on August 26, 1994. Bled a formal subdivision application with the City of Oroiu) for approval of a residential plat of property legally describes! as Iollou s. Ia)t 2. Block 1, Bayview Fanns. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the property"); and WHFRF.AS, after due published and mailed muice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 46*» ^58 et seq and the Citv of Orono s Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19. W4, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application vsere given the opportunity to speak thereon, and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on October 10. 1994, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of K-P Properties Inc. and Robert S. Olson, noting the following findings of fact: 1. riie propeny is located within the RR IB, Sinjlc Family Rural Rcsidcnti.tl Zoning District requiring a miniinuni of 2 acres ol contiguous dry buildahle land within each newly created lot. 2. The property cimtalns a total of approximately 17.49 acres, of which approximately 1.1 acres has been delineated as wetland. 3 The proposed plat contains one lot (designated as Lot 1) containing an c.xisting residence structure, such lot being 2.75 acres in area, exceeding the -.0 acre minimum lot area requirement. 4 The septic system serving the residence on lot I is failing and is intenried to he rephieed. ^•tellmmary on site sevsage treatment systems sue evaluation data Pace 1 of 7 indicates that priman and altem<ite drainfield sites for current and future use are available within the pn>peny. subject to a final site evaluation reps^rt being submitted by the site esaluator. In 3ddiiit>n to Ia X I, three Outlots are proposed to be created w ith the follow ing intent for each; (1) Outlot A: 0.28 acre remainder parcel to be ciMiibirKHl with I-4>t 1. HUvk 1. Bayview' Fams at such time that (Xitk>t B is used for private driveway or road access to (Xiilot C. (2) Outlot B: 0.32 acre 50' future road corridor providing access for future development of Outlot C. In the event that Outlot C is further developed using road accesses from adjacent properties not requiring the use of Outlot B. Outlots A atKi B w ill be legally combined w ith propt>sed l ot 1. (3) Outlot C: 14 13 acre parcel intended for future development into single family residential lots. Outlot C is intended to not be buildable for even a simile residence unless or until it is furtlicr subdivided and/or replatted into one or more building sites. Outlot B docs not provide continuous access to Outlot C Irom Bayside Road because Outlots B and C do no abut one another. Outlot B only provides access to Outlot C in conjunction with an existing access easement over Lot 1. DhKk I, Bayview f arms in favor of Lot 2. BkKk 1. Bayview Farms. Said easement is the subject of an agreement attached to this resolution as I-Ahibit A. which provides that should Outlot B be used for future access for devek'pment of Outlot C, the owner of Lot 1. Block 1, Bayview Farms shall plat said casement as an Outlot for road purposes. It is the City's intent that if Outlot B and the easement/future outk>t in U)t 1, BkKk 1. Bayview l arms are developed for a future road to serve Outlot C. then the existing residences on Lots 1 and 2. Block 1. Bayview Farms shall construct driveway accesses onto said new road and eliminate the existing direct driveway accesses to Bayside Road. Face 2 of 7 8. It the City’s intent that in the event Outlet D is used in the future for road purposes, that sueh road shall be constructed to City standards, aixl that prior to constructum of said road the City will he granted a road and utilities easement iuer Outlet B. q. It is the City’s intent that Outlois A, B and C remain in common ownership until such lime that the future development ot Outlet C occurs. 10. It is the City's intent that at the time Outlet C is further developed, the City will at that time require the payment of park dedication tees and the dedication of all neeessai7 and appropriate public easements within Outlets A, B and C. 11 It is the City’s intent that proposed Loi i grant the sundard perimeter utility and drainage casements based on the assumption that Outlot B will in the future becc.ne a roadway. \2 Althoueh I lennepin County Department of Public Works has requested additional right-of-wav for County Road 84. no additional County road ripht-of-way will be required of the developer consistent w ith the standards for a collector road m the Orono Comprehensive Plan. 13. A driveway easement over Outlot B shall be granted in favor ot Lot 1 tor the existing driveway in Outlot B. 14 The single family residence existing on proposed Lot I requires no turther variances. NOW THERFFORK, BE I I RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Citv Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary^ plat for Robert S. Olson and K-P Properties Inc. at 4645 Bay side Road per the August 25. 1994. revised OcU.ln;r 5. 1994. by Raymond A. Prasch ot Lot Surveys Company Inc., subject to the following conditions; 1 Outlois A. B and C shall be subject to the following restrictions; Pace 3 of 7 3 C OuClot B is platted for future roadway purjH^ses and shall remain as a separate tax parcel until such time (Xulot C is further developed. In the event that Outlet C is further developed w ithout the need for use of Outlet B as roadway access, then Outlet B may be legally combined with an adjacent property. Outlets A. B and C shall remain in common ownership until Outlet C is further developed. Outlet A is considered as an unbuildable remainder parcel and upon devcl ipment of Outlet C, Outlet A shall oe either combined with Outlo* B and Lot 1 if Outlet B is not used lor road purposes, or Outlet A shall be legally combined with l^t 1. Block 1. Bayview Fanns in the event that Outlet B IS used for roadway purposes. Outlet C is created for future development only, and no building permits shall be issued for Outlet C until such time that it is repi^ned into one or more bui.Jable lots. The agreement betwet.i Mr and Mis. Olson, N ■ and Mrs. Geltre, and K-I Properties Inc. attached to this resolution as Fxhibit A shall not be revised or terminated without approval of the City Council. In the event that Outlot B is used as an access road serving a future development in Outlot C, the residence on Lot 1 shall revise its driveway location onto sai«l outlot road wav and eliminate direct access to Bayside Road. 4. A driveway easement over Outlot B shall be granted in tavor of l,x)t 1. Pace 4 of 7 The following list of Hruil suhniillah must he subaiittcd to the Zoning Adminisit.Kor two weeks prior to the regularly '^heduled Co irr.il meeting on the second and founh NK^iiday s oi the month; 1. Record plat drawings in the fomi of two iZ) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" “ 200'. Drawing to iiKlude; A. Lot lines planed per preliminary sursey by Raymond A. I’rasch ot l ot Surscys Company Inc. dated August 25. 1W4 revised October 5. 19<>4. B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" within Lot 1. such casements being 10* in width aU ’iig the east and north lot lines, 10 in width ali'iig the westerly boundary adjacent to Uutlot B. and 5' in width alone the southwesterly and southerly lot lines. 2. Ixgal documenis required; / . Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mongage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. 13. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently alfeeling the property. 3 4 C Siened and executed driveway easement over Outlot B in tavor of Lot 1. I'inal site evaluation report, subject to approval by City Fees to be paid: A. Lceal review and filing fees of S200.00. Total due: $200.00 Pa :e 5 of 7 Adi>ptcd by ihc City Council of th.* City of C)rono. Mmnes^Ha at a regular meeting hckl October 10. 1994 Am ST rK>ro(hy M Ilallin. City Clerk lulwanl J. Callahan. Jr., Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OE HENNITMN ) Ihe lorcgoing irntrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of (X.ober 1994. by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. &. Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor & City Clerk ot the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notarx Public Page t of 7 cm' OF ORONO P.O. Bo% 66 Crystal Bay, MN 5532.^ 473-7357 TO;K'P Prv^penics. Inc DotukJ R Peterv ’n, Preskkm .2435 42nd Avenue N\»rth PlynKHith, MN 55441 ZONING FILE fl9t>7 NOTICE OF PL.\N^TNG CONCMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOIICE: September 26. 1994 COPIES: Robert S. Olson 4645 Bayside Road Maple Plain. MN 55359 TITE OF APPLICATION: Subdivision NOTE: 3 FOR I AGAINSTDATE OF N. ETINC,: 09 19/^ Planning Commission rcci'tnmcnds the following: Denial for reasons rKHed below .NOTES iNND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planmng Commission ackmmledged the request to revise the original 7-lot (5-ncw) proposal to merely splitting off the Olson residence from the 17-acre parcel Applicant provided a revised sketch iiKlicaiing relix-aicd future road outlot and lot lines to eliminate ilw lot width and setback variances. The prt^*sal lacks a continuous road outlot to the rear parcel, but rather relies on an access easement ihriHieh ilie Oelire priipcrty. Applicant noted the timing was critical in order to complete the sale of Olson's rcsidetKC. Planning Commission offered tabling or denial, a denial acting to move this on to the Council's October 10 mcetmg. by which time applicant may he able to resolve the issue of Geffre's involvement in the plat and address any other staff cotKcrns. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as; Citv Council. Mondav, October 10, 1994; meeting slans at 7:30 p.m.^ - If you desire certified copies of the official l*lanning Commission minutes, they are available from the Citv Clerk after review- and approval by the Planning Commission. ORONO P1.ANMNG COMMISSION MKF.TINC MINUI KS FOR SFPIFMBKR 19. 1994 KOtX The Ofono PUnnin^o*ronissioii met on ihe above dale »ith the tollowiim inen^s Wot-Cyvm slttrfwn Petmon, Sandra Smith, Charles Nolan. Jra^nd Janice Bet Chair Charles S4.hroeda\)ale Lindquist, and Candace Rowletic tv^^sent Asjdstam Planmng and Zomnq AdS^ator Michad CiafiTOO and Recorder^Wy Frost represented Staff hUyor b\ard Callahan and Coimcilmemb«jf Diann Cioeiten vs ere present Vice-Chjjr Petersor^Ued the mctiing to order al^^ p m m) #l*00-MiaiAELPK\V.4ll5/4l25W.^RlO\VNR(V\l>- SUBDIVISION OF A LOI RF\ilCVNGXMEN;^RFNF'V\L OP 2/I6j’9J approval The Aflidavit of Publication and Ccitifi^^Alatling w ere noted It was moved by Petersoa seconded to table Item #1800 to the October 17. 19Q4 Planning Corrunission ?v1ectimjZAyes 0. in) #1914 - THOMAS C. ^^YLLIS ( Ol^U/OM & BKTII TRAFF, 2640 NOR1II SllOlO: DRIVWI30 OLD CRY STALKY ROAI> - SUBDIVISION OF A LOI LINE RE.\RR i<NCEMI:NT - REVISION The Affidavit oFR|ll^cation and Certificate of Mailing wer?^^^^ The appiicay(Cre not present It was noted that the revision w^minor and not a substantiai^hanue from the previously approved lavoul. It was movfd by Peterson, seeondeJ by Berg. 10 recommend approval of Item #1914 ^^l («) #1967 - BOSAI.D R. FFTFR-SON. K-P PROPFRTIF.S. 4645/4665 BAYSIBK ROAD - PRELIMINARY St BDIVISION AND LOT LINK REARRANCF.MEN I The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate ot Mailing were noted. Mr. Peterson was present. MINirn S OF THt ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION M! I TING HtU) ON SEPIEMBFR W. IW (#3) Ucm #1907* D PeteTH>ivtn:tlre - ('omiiaKd Cialfrcm suied ptiipcrtv is Uvatcd South of Ba^-snlc Road. Fast of C\>unty ITie iniual request was in%t>l>imi m lots to include the Gertie and Olsi>n properties i\pp4icani’s base been worVing wuh staff on this project The C'itVs two pnmarv goals hase been to aeate surtaWe access kxatKWS and draintiekis that would the t»% slope Iniiit for mound systems At this point, applicant wishes to separate the Geffre residence from the applicatHMi. split off the Olson house from their 17 5 acre pared » it can^ sold and designate the lenuinder of the Olson property as Outlol A to be platted h:et If this IS done, the i .ty would need to a)iestnct Outlol A to be created for friture deselopmenl ofdv bVeiiuirc Park Dedication Fees due when Outlet A is platted, and c)rnjimc hituie platt ing of Olson propertv to conlomi to the lot width, area, and setback sta^ards ot the RR IliVoning District The desclopcr is antiapating submittal ot a four or five kit plat later this year The applicant submitted a revision stating the simple lot diiision would not allow a cur^«l line The surveyor created i new oullot for a future driveway D Peterson said notices had been sent out for the f.uure five-lot division This drawing is to ^ow the City- what the current plans are for splmmg off the house The revision changed the .0 setback from the deck to ^0‘ Copies of this revision were handed v>ui to ( ommtssion members 1 Peterson stated the reason tor the application at this time was to fanlitate the sale ot the Olson residence A review of the septic evaluation had been done, and D Peterson ^d the conceptual tivc-lot plan needed to be revised to tour lots A lot division or plat tor the four-lot revision would require time that the Olson's do not have if they wish Uv do.se on their property D Peterson also remarked that a legal mauc-r is in question whethw the outlet is needed At this time. D Peterson is asking tor approval tor one existing lot and an oullot which would l>e unlHiildable without a plat Smith asked if this would be setting a precedent, and GatVron stated that the City would nonnallv approve only an outlol that hxs an access D Peterson said Getlie to be les-s than two acres and therefore, non-conforming, without Outlet A deeded fust to Gertie GatVron said this only makes sense m the big sub division picture I o gam the eascmienl that the GvtTre lot would provide. Nolan askcxJ D Peterson vvhy the trade o properties under consideration is not being done at this tune ^ . . done before the next meeting but. meanwhile, the Olson sale would tall through, and askc only for approval or denial from the Planning Commission in order to move this matter forward to the (itv Council Nolan asked about the desirability ot having the acccs. t outlet instead of County Road S t GatVron said the County will rcsiuire access to both houses to be on the new road. GatVron statcxl a conceptual agreement would need conditions atUichcd to it. MINXTTS OF THF ORONO Pl^XNMNO OONtMISSlON I TING I »■ I -1) ON SEPTEMIU-.R 19. l<»4 (#3) hem #1967 - D. Pcte«oft-tie{rre - Cominued PrtCTSOT rrxrvrd. Smith seconded, to deny the applicaiion #1967. A vts 3-Peter?on. Smith, Bo^ Nays l-Nolan #4) #1895 - pat WOEFT, 2871 C ASCO POINT RO j\D - ;\FrER-TllE-FACT VAIUANCCS - PI BEIC llEARENCi The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Nfailing were noted The applicant not present Smith noted applicant assumed the item was being tabled at his pnor request It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to table Item #1895 for review at the October 17 m«tmg Ayes 4. Navs 0 (#5) H I M #1948 - FRANK KOKFSII/JOAN M. HARMON, 4100 WATFRTOWN KOAl> - CONDITIONAE I SE PI.RMITSA'ARLVNCE - CONTIMIA1 1ON OF PIJBUC IIEARINC; The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted GatVron noted the applicants attorney hiid requested t:d)ling It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Berg, to table Item #1948 to the October 17 1994 meeting of the Planning Commission Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#6) ITEM #1953 - WIELIAM AEEKN, 3475 IJViNCSTON AVENUE - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PHBEIC HEARING The Affidavit of Publication and Certficate of Mailing were noted Mr Allen was present Item #1953 was tabled from last meeting pending receipt ot an updated survey which ha.s been received This proposal is for an addition to the house and a deck 1 he separation between this addition and the garage would be only 3+ ft where 10 ft is required. Applicant is asking for a side setback variance from the ten ft requiiemcnl. and a setback variance between the buildings No hardcover variance is required since the property meets the 35«/o limit, and no structural lot coverage variance is required since the property meets Uie 1500 sq ft allowed per code 10 03 subdivision C. r ik Hennepin County I lines «•<«. C ^ • int V AJmini>t nn. h September 16. 1994 Michael P. Caffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Adulnlstrator City of Orono P.O. Bo* 66 Crystal, 55323-0066 R£: Proposed Plat - Bayview Faras 2nd Addition eSAH 84, south side approximately 600 feet east of CSr>H 19 Section 6, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 2179 Review and Recommendations Dear Hr. Gaffron: Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: • For future Improvements along CSAH 84 as this road approaches the CSAH 19 intersection, the developer should dedicate an additional 10 feet of right of way for a total of 40 feet of right of way from and along the CSAH 84 centerline. • The location of the proposed access road, Bayview Road, Is acceptable. As proposed, Bayview Road will be located approximately 188 feet J^^^t of the plats northeast corner. The developer must have an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning access construction. The developer should contact Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548 for access information and entrance permit forms. • All access from the plat to CSAH 84 roust be via proposed Bayview Road. Direct driveway access to CSAH 84 will not be permitted. he '*^9 driveway entrance for proposed Lot I, Block 3 must be removed and access for this lot be via Bayview Road. • All other proposed construction within County right of way also requires an approved Hennepin County utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our ermi Section at 930-2550 for utility permit forms. Derartmcnt of Public Work^_ _ _ _. IZO \\ Avi-niic Soiuli Hopkiii". MinncM'ta (612)9)0-2670 FAX:(0l2) ^>30-251 ) T IUV(612) 930-26^^6 f t 4%. Michael P. Gaffron Sipiember 16, 1994 Page 2 • The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way, disturbed during construction. Please direct any response to Doug Mattson Sincerely, . JeKn^n, P.E.Thomas D Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ/DBM 5. TO: FROM: l>ATF: Chair SchnvJcr and Orono Tlannif^ Commission Members Ron City Admin.strator Miclud IV Gaflron, Asst. Plannit^ & Zoning Administrator September 15. 19^ SLBJFX'T: #1%T Riibert Olsi'n IX'ruild R Peterson ot K-P Ih’opcrtics Iik. - 4645 Baysidc Road - Preliminary Subdivisum (Class II) - l^lblk: Hearing Application: Props>saI to split off existing msidetKe with 2+ acres from existing IS acre parcel. Note: Applicants originally applied for a 7 lot plat including the Irvin Gettre property at 4665 Bayside. However, as noted in applicants’ letter of September 14th. they are requesting to down grade the application to merely splitting off the Olson residence and leaving the remainder of the Olson property as CXitK't A to be platted later this year. List of Exhibits A - Application H - Original letter ot Request 8/26^94 C - Revised letter of Request 9/14-94 D - Plat Map E - Property Owners l ist F Original Plat Drawing for 6 Total laits (Future Submission) G - Revised Plat Drawings for Creation of 1 Lot Plus Outlot H - Revised Plan with Staff Comment 1 - City EngitKer Comments Regarding Original Proposal T - c\ia.4rU. rrx-* Background Staff has been working with Mr Peterson for a number of months in regards to the platting of Robert Olson's 17.5 acres in conjunction with Irvin Geffre’s 2 acres to create an additional 5 building sites. Two primary goals of the City have been to create a roadway system that will lie ill w ith adiaceni properties in a logical manner, and pr ividing primary and alternate drainf leld sites on each new lot that meet the slope limit for mound systems. Tlie latter has proved challencme. and is still in progress. Due to the developer's agreements with the property owners^ they will likely be back later this year with a proposal to create 4 new lots instead of 5, but w ish to priK'eed to split off Olson’s property immediately so that it can be sold. Septic Sites for Olson Property i’roposed primary and alternate drainfield sites meeting City requirements have been desigiutcd for the Olson property . While applicant has not submitted the actual testing report for those sites, the developer’s site evaluator has been in contact with .Steve Weekman during the site Zoning Flic #1967 September 15. 1994 Page 2 e\aluation process. Since the Olson propeny currently has a tailing septic system, the primary site will he used immediately and the alternate site would remain for potential future use. Lot Standards for K.tisting Residence Please review the proposed single lot divisi »n. Exhibit G In the narrow ci'ntext of a single lot subdivision. thi.s lot would require a number of variances to lot standards, i e.: Only 187’ of frontage on Hayside Road. - A 30' setback from the proposed south lot line which would be considered as a rear lot line, hut which becomes a side lot line in the context of the larger subdivision. Clearly, this 1-lot division only mokes sense in the context of the full multi-lot subdivision Proposed Outlot A Again, in the context of the single lot subdivision, the layout of Outlot A would be illogical However, it fits together in the context of the complete proposal. If Lot 1 is split off from the remainder of the Olson parcel as proposed, and Outlot A is created, what is the down side to the City if the future subdivision for some reason is never completed?. In creating Outlot A. with the very narrow neck at the southeast cor.-'er ot »he Gettre property and leaving 150’ of frontage on Hayside Road, the outlot would not be contorming in lot width as an iralividual building site. It w\>uld certainly be appropriate that the City place specific restrictions on Outlot A, as follows; 1. Outlot A is created merely for future development, and shall not be used for single family residential purposes until a future plat has been approved by the City. 2. Park dedication f.es will be due when Outlot A is platted for future development. 3. Any future platting of Outlot A that does not include the Geffre pn'perty must include the Olson property (Lot 1) to result in the Olson property becoming confomiing to the lot width, area and setback standards of the RR-IB Zoning District. Proposed Future Access I.ocatiun It is the developer ’s intent that a new private road be developed with the future plat, accessing Bayside Road either at ihe Olson ’s current driveway kKatii>n or to the immediate west ot the Geffre property (see Exhibit F). Applicant is requested to sul nil written continuation from Hennepin County DOT that the current driveway location would be an acceptable road access location. Zoning Fik #1967 September 15, 1994 Page 3 The general coniments by the City l-nginccr in relation to H h : original multiple lot proposal are included for the benefit of the applicant in planning for ilw future subdivision. Applicant is requested to pmvidc a copy of the agreement/casement for roadway purposes over the Geffre property, which agreement yiel ds an x*'ess corridi^r of a width «-jitable for future development of a road outlot. Staff Recommendation Staff rea>.mnends approval only unde*- the following conditions: 1. Outlot A is created merely for future development, and shall mit be used for single family residential purposes until a future plat has been approved by the City. 2. Park dedication fees will be due when Outlot A is planed for future development. 3. Any future platting of Outlot A that does not include the Geffre propc* y must iiK'lude the Olson propeny (IvOl 1) to result in the Olson property becoming conforming to the lot width, area and setback standards of the RR-IB Zoning District. 4. The e.xisiing failing septic system at 4645 Watertown Road shall be replaced with a conforming system per the requirements of the City code. 5. Variances to lot width and rear setback granted foi Lot 1 subject to coming into future conformance when the full plat is completed. 6. Applicant to provide confirmation of Henn DOT access kxation approval. ch Zoning File #1%7 September 15, !W4 Page 3 The generai conunems by the City Hnginecr in relation to the original multiple lot profK>s;il are included for the benefit of the applKant in planning for the future subdivision. Applicant is requested to provide a copy of the agreement easement for roadway purposes o\er the Cteffre property, which agreement yields an access corridor of a width suitable for future devck)pment of a road outlet. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval only unde tin* following conditions: 1. Outlet A is created merely for future development, and shall not be used for single family residential purp<.)ses until a future plat has been approved by the City. 2. Park dedication fees will be due when Outlet A is platted for future development. 3. Any future platting of Outlet A that diK*s not include the Gtffre property must include the Olson property (Lot 1) to result in the Olson property becoming con orming to the lot width, area and .setback standards of the RR IB Zoning District. 4. The existing failing septic system at 4645 Watertown Road shall be replaced w ith a conforming system per the requirements of the City code. 5. Variances to lot w'idth and rear setback granted for Lot 1 subject to corning into future conformance when the full plat is completed. 6. Applicant to provide copfinTiation of llenn DOT access location approval. ch K-P PROPERTIES, INC. 12435 42nd Ave. North PLYMOUTH, MN. 55441 August 26, 1994 Jean Mabusth Planning Director City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 I r* Dear Ms. Mabusth: Enclosed is an application of Preliminary Plat for Lot 1 and Lot 2, Bayvicw Farms, which is 4645 and 4665 Bayside Road In Orono. This application is made by K-P Properties, Inc. which is buying all of Lot 1, Bayvicw Farms and Irvin Geffre who is the owner of Lot 2, Bayview Farms is joining in on this application. The Geffre property will have the lot lines re-arranged as a result of this plat. We presented two alternate sketch plans to the Planning Commission in June of this year. One showed a road to be built along the joint property line with the property to t’ vest. This alternate has been abandoned because we cannot come to an agreement with the Whites who own this property. The resulting plat will use a roadway which is located on the Olson property and on an easement which was previously given to the Olson's covering an 80 by 80' triangle located on the Southeast corner of the Geffre Property. We intend to deed over to Geffres that portion of the Olson property lying westerly of the new road in consideration for them joining in on this plat. We will be creating 5 new building lots all of which will meet your ordinance. A Wetland delineation report is attached and the septic system evaluation will be submitted under separate cover. Please place this item on your Planning Commission agenda for the September 19, 1994 meeting. You can call me at 476-5317 if you have any questions regarding this application. Sincerely: Donald R. Peterson, President K-P Properties, Inc. CITY OF OROHO “ SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ■ A PROPERTY LOCATION 4645 and 4665 Bayside Road rvrv r-nvoLa 9 • w<«MW C t V ' * II AMfMWw Wl • AWW Site Address 4 wwve»wv^vi » W/- wV'VaVV V a W .. K ^ ro T n 1 06-117-23 22 0008 and 0007 , j-.-j. ff» ^vv*:Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) -- - - - - - - - - - -- ..y.. t^wwwar r"“i».n»w\ • ww Please check one •“ Property X abstract or torrens?LvOi f\vl Tli^ Attach legal description to application^ Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block I, Bayview Faro^ r C' / ^ ^ w/ c.w^ APPLICANT Phone fhone) S51-92Q2 Name K- P Properties, Inc. Donald R. Peterson, President Phone (work)476-5317 m-<5 42nd Av.-_So.__________clty:,Pivno,ith . >«■ ,_ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)672 5662 Name Robert S. Olsori -------------------------------------Phone (work) 535-1481 Address: 4645 Bavslde Road City: Orono. MN.Zip: 55323 (attach list xi more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size 18.62 0.88 19.50 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units _2 Other (specify)__ _ _ ___ __ Present Zoning District kk PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size:Rfl.427 Units per 19.5 Acres - 0.359 u/a Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check)X Residential Other (specify) \ ‘ "a >i--: / 1 mecessart for complete preliminary application aNIHDM material ME«SSMI V. f?eliminary''pi»t“in£Sr^»tion on obtain I Certified Property Owners List ot _ _^ a*£03 Govt Center this list frcjm Her 348-3271). 4. As an addendum Notified' of this application. ?his“list ?rS"cL^pln'iounty Departr.ont 348-3271). application, please “^tach^ajeparatc last o£ any other persons you Department that Prelinlnary Plat Application is Certification by Honing Zoninro££i=i»l'» Signature. Date and water assessments). 1.;;;;;;;o£ £«= (parh ‘f--“^.^s^iiriorieroi formal put.2. siVned"certi£icato of Suri-ey or nyUr 3. Title opinion. i: S"ers ArreemonranrUtter of Credit. a. ^ha^ Final Plat Application is complete. FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II 5 ml Subdivision of a Lot Lino Rearrangement preliminary Review (Class I S II Subdivision) $200.00 300.00 300.00 •/ s /«”>i se^e TTT 6 all non—residential)Preliminary Review (Class III 325.00 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) MPlus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 tieiJtfwax vwa. - — __________— — — — — — — “ — — — -------------------- J Th77ppirc’a‘nt'hereby “st?I?orf *CitV Engineer? c\ty®AtYo*r requested by the Zoning *^"fr ggsary to process this application an ^ijther'agu'TsuTa/all'^rdTmonal fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature K-P Properties, Date 8/26/94 terson. President review meetings of the Planning Conmission and Counc to have an the Building . Zoning Office of this change prior to i^^meeting. , Date 8126191* Xru/A 1 poX^ K’P Properties, Inc. 12435 42nd Awe. North Plymouth, MN. 55441 Phone 476 5317 September 14. 1994 Jean Mabusth Planning Director City of Orono RO Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN. 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth: On August 26. 1994 K*P Properties, Inc applied for a preliminary plat for subdivision of 4645 and 4665 Bayside Road In Orono. We have been working to obtain roadway to serve this property and to obtain septic sites which will meet Orono's rcQuirments for this property. It appears that a 6 lot division which creates 5 new building sites on the Olson property, 4645 Bayside, will not allow adequate septic sites. A revision of the subdivision to provide 4 new building sites appears feasible. The owners of 4645 Bayside Road have purchased another home and have a buyer who wants to purchase their existing home. In order to accomodate that sale we are requesting that our preliminary plat application be downgraded to a simple lot division of Lot 1. Block 1, Bayview Farms. This will provide one lot for the house which will allow the house to be sold. We will retain an easement for access to the remaining property which will be dedicated to Orono if the future platting of the remaining property requires a road lying east of 4665 Bayside Road. We are negotiating for a road which would be west of 4665 Bayside but this may take several months. y ' Enclosed is a lot survey showing a stmpte ^4ofc= dt^ton of Lot 1, Block 1, Bayside Farms into 2 lots. The location of the possible roadway would be the the area shown as easement. ^ W-9 • *r ------- » ' • •«^ J : y . ntmss Itf x«wj ■ V/ ■ ,., ot ««• • •*« «v *• ^ 1 P *« fV * • - (rrf^-(i i ••' 1 r »1 !■ * • • » «^______: b ' 1 « t '' 1' It* M * ! L v^ '♦• •«• 5 • m$ • ^- i CL^. j _________________ua-g^-^-i— -----------------------*—■ ?! --------*■«., ^iTtS fOO*'*. jiWTH kTJ irm*» ., . , ■ I ,, »* 4JOf fsnrrs t / •" 1*1- «€»«*- *0*«M MTI Oi/n/M HCTNCPIH• ’ ^li;•ATCN 004^ -raop BxmTWOAtIR •jiMW/ADOOifT* ■ " *.. . <. 1,^ *• ■ ■ ________J.;V MOO AOOO kOMCO lOHi ^TAXOAYfO NAM/AOOA-•♦, .TAXOAVCRNMC/AOOK■i'v>-i • * OMO AOOO OMCO NA»C TAMOAYCK ^«NAHE/AOOO 1-2* •■• AOOO nr'tr.' w: -Si . \ 1 ' 4 rn.. SO 04-117 n n ooof0454S OATSXOC 10 0 a S OdOCOONH omo a SHAMN RENNEtOMI 4549 OAVSXOC 1040 NAOU OUXN (M 55X50SO 04-11r-XS XX 0008 04445 OAVSXOC 10 0 S a H N OLSON MKIT S OLOON 9010 HXUSOOlO AVC N NPIS 144 55<»X8.*>SO si-iio-xs ss eooi04440 OAVSXOC 10 0 a N cure ooooxe a ncva curr4440 OAVSXOC 00 MAIU lUXN ftl 55559 SO Sl-llO-XS 55 0009 OQOSO AOOOCSS UNASSICNCO lAXNTClS CICEK HONCON4C1S lAXNTClS CICER NQMCOMNCKS t/9 ClAXO PASCM 100 LUCC LINC IIOCC fttOLE PLAIN m 55559 SO 51-118-C5 S4 0005 000X5 LUCC LINE IXOCE C N NATTSViaN B V A MATTSTION CUOTXS N MATTSTION IS LUCE iXNC IIOOC NAPU PLAIN m 55359 i. 4 '-'- 'r'S'" '. . € *• ‘ COUHTV PlOPCtTT INTOTNATIDN STSTtN PHOPCITV OMCRS LIST58 04-117-XS XX 090500180 NOPTM SMQPE 01 M OAVIO L MMITC Cr ALricotixci c NMiTC14195 PAULS N lOGElS m 5557458 04-117-X5 X5 0001 00058 AOOICSS UNASSICNCO JCiUtC T AI«1sriONC JCAN T AimnONB X5S NORTH ARN LANE HOUND 444 55544SO 31-118-XS SS 0904 047X0 OAVSXOC 10 8 PCTEl ACNEV ETAL HI 0 PCTEl ACNCV MUTE X 80K 888 HAPLE PLAIN W4 55559 58 51-118-X5 55 0010 00058 AOOICSS UNASS1O4E0 IRVIN E 8C16SAGCL ET AL (QUARTO INC 14X4 NARHQN PL 0X09 HPLS (44 55405 TOTAL tATCH 004 OOOlS ICPOIT NO. PI435491 PACE 15 r.7*V 4 -W. T N if , V »5b * ; 1 •'58 04-117-XS XX 0007 04445 OAVSXOC 10 X T I H L CEFfll XIVXN T CCFFPI 4445 OAVSXOC RO HAPLC PLAIN HN 5559958 04-117-XS X4 000100X15 NORTH ARH U JCAt«4C T AIHSTIONB JCAN T ARHSTR0N6 255 NORTH ARN LANE HOUND m 5554458 51-110-XS 15 0007 04740 8AVSI8C 10 L VOCCRST I 0 OUNN0 bu»M a L Yoccisr 4740 8AVSI0E 10 hApLE PLAIN 144 55559 a?'*#*.,,, -jr ... I> I ii -5-■•'■if.f 50 51-118-XS SS OOil 900S8 ADDRESS UNASSICNCO 8 R LANCE a J 8 OURRCU * OlUCE R LANn SUITE 415 yV ^ 55 H JACKSON 8LV0 CHICACO XL 40444 V £' i ■ !>■: .. . .V' w sxL fTk 1 *' '•;"' iM '■f’f-■•'I''tr.4,.. • intli. ■;. i ‘ ■'' tif'- #1 o • '-:-V . 3*t'f S, ■ <-4 . I* ■ T . i%/T%8N aL ( •• / # ■ s ■»4 • » h i .>'.'0 ’vV.»*i >/‘i • •• ■ '. .1 ‘ * '*■ <’. .4 -V •t..‘to\ V‘,A*f */ -»r- * r ^ • • w ’ ; • f'* ' Sr^ <%%S • • '«.• i. • • ••*.• ./ *; • v« ^ ‘.rf # *, Vf-i • I* - A* ». ^-j;;________ t • * ». t. •• • ^ • •. • '■•.*.• • *. •••.v ;• *-‘*'.......;:/• r*-;r. • * • . * -•' ■• ••• ' ' m • • * ■ rnimmrm HIM.t«4Ukr.4«>'. I-%v -mu <4 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene And6rHk & Associates Engineers ft Architects September 9, 1994 BormCfoa torv Anjefl^ Jnd ihc i$ ^ AiwriFcu#^' OckX^nunitvi'Vi^c^ Omj G aonwpoc ^ ftnhr** VI' * JeWh C P£ M«irwi L kvw«4 tw f%an5 f ^ G^nr t C .x^ ^ T*xm«s f Nc\^^ '‘C ftOt>g*t G k*s.^?^ Pi kAjn M rber«n C PA •V^'^nr Ccv'iuftini N cmr 3 a yrM Pf i^^r* A Go^umn Pf %*«€-» f Pf ftx'hftia \ft Pogpr Pt CVM O LomxA Pf •ncie^ C A I A je"> ♦ ftourrjon Pf Mar* • Mjmcr> Pf Mw^'jr ^ tauphjm PE »d« Pf Tnei *^ f Ar>dpnor a « a OoTMd C Bu^a^ Pf t’vxnas A kAio Pf j ieer^oag p| rsmae- Maninef P| Mv hae4 P ftau Pf A|nr^ M fiTAj A C P Jl t^T'-WW' Pf C P£ jamps f Maiana Pf ,)pr*^ D Pf % /r J Ar*^« Pf P ArxSP'XV^ Pf Mark « actfl Pi U»« A Pf Gary W Mnnpn Pf Pa»-^ J Ganncrt A ^ A Par*^ ; f.typ^.rr Pf A Sc» k*' -xJL Phap J c «kkp« Pf Mark O wakrv Pf AWp% 0 JprHfrs Pf ' PHAcJ G awPi Pf ka»P^ L aip'^spr' Pf Gary O ft-raom Pf «p«k t upa Pf Ockiguft J •mra Pf O Gi.«Jhnn Pf C«.Ao Ov^ Pf Pau G Meuet Pf John P GoAVr Pi Chartn A fnekkors IPO M P»Ae-%kv M ' v'w’ iar'Tps i i gr^ak* Mr. Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Dox 66 Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 Re: K-P Properties File No. 139-1967 Dear Mike. We have reviewed the preliminary plat and grading plan submitted by K-P Properties, Inc. lor Bawiew Farms 2nd Addition. The property is loeated south ot Baysidc Road (County Road No. 84) and cast of C.S.A.ll. No. 19 in the northwest quarter of Section 6. The propo.sed acce.ss ItK-ation on Baysidc Road appear to be adequate, however. Hennepin County .should review the plan.s. ITie platting of a future connection to the adjacent property to the south and west is appropriate. The horiz.t^ntal street alignments are acceptable. Ihe vertical curves alignments do not appear to meet a .30 MPH design speed as required by City Code, llie minimum acceptable length for each of the three vertical curves are 160 ’. 110’ and 180 ’ respectively, .starting at the north and moving south. A typical .section for the proposed street should be submitted that shows a minimum paved width of 28 feet and a section of 8-inchcs of class 5, 100% crushed aggregate base and 3-inchcs of bituminous pavement. 'I hc grading plan seems to indicate that an urban section roadway is propc>sed. If that is the case, a drainage plan should be submitted to address the runoff. If a rural section roadway is pro|x)sed. the ditches should be at least 2-fcet below the edge of the roadway. Tlic grading plan does not .show grading of the cul-dc-sac nor does it addre.ss drainage patterns or erosion control. Silt fence should be installed along the wetland areas prior to construction. Drainage easements should be shown on any wetland areas and along any proposed drainage routes. Tlie plans should be submitted for review by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Plea.se contact me at this office if you have any question.s regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONES! ROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. JL Sliawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Hlohwav 36 • 5t. Ppu I. MN 551 !3 • 612-636-4600 _______I -s 0O*3r 3a* E 1049^ m 8 T I* *Hr V . J j :u>.1Oi ♦• m«8«O*'I ^1 *1 . \j • «• m/.V'*1 ►'!:'-7• 'li. » ■» - ^ ; r_ ^ f ^i!0>'^ ^]:2 ->—7'^AO” W I 285-00~v \\ 's f">»§5 J6 •\ .. a\...i lAAl >*yof nr • •n. •- • I \• •• ^ • .. • • • • • -• • - • . «L # • • • ,. . . ^ ’ »\ #*«k. ♦ * *. • • ■ pophamha iK 3300 Plfi«r laffray Tower 222 ^^koth Stitct Minneapoli*. Mlnne*ot» 55402 (612) 333-WOO TO:Michael P. Gatfron Asaiatant Planning and Zoning Admimsiratcr Ciiv of Orono VIA TELECOPY FROM: RE; DATE: Thomas J. Barrett. Esq. Item #1967 Robert S. OlS0n/K*P Properties, Inc, iHOctober J^I994 particularly concerned that the road access to the proposed large lot labelled OuUoi B appears to require access over Lot 2, which is not owned by the subdividing applicant. asIf a later attempt to develop OuUoi B rtms into resistance from the owner of Lot 2 to the development of the proposed road, and if the other possible altemaUve route on the other side of Lot 2 does not materialize, then the conungent planned for road, represented by Outlet A, will only be as good as our ability to require Lot 2 to provide the comer of its Lot to the road proposed. To evaluate the degree of control which the City would have in opening a road over Lot 2 I have reviewed the Agreement, which is attached to the Council packet. I c^ imagine the Mowing potential difficulties with this Agreement in any effort by the City or the developer to open a road over Lot 2. First, it is not apparent under the terms of this Agreement that the successors and assigns, subsequent purcha ser, would be bouno to follow die tgrmit of the Agreement. Second, because of the contingencies discussed in the it is reasonable to assume that disputes of fact will or may ariseAgreement,of such disputes, the City wouui benot the cited contingencies have occurred. In the event ... faced with the pros^ct of liugation. rather than with the more desirable prospect of simply opening a previously platted road. I realize that platting a road on the property of Lot!, which reaches proposed Outlot D. has the undesirable impact of coming too close to the house which now is m p ace on Lot 1. One possible scenario for your consideration would be to plat the road, even though it is undesirable, and then to note in our subdividing and resolution, the existence oi the Agreement and the planned Outlot A as the more desirable road access. Mike, this memo sets out my concerns. Please call to discuss, 0I2;22060346 KVI3/94 1 TO: FROM PATE; Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Ccmnrssion Members Ron Moorse. Cit> /\dmimstrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assi. Planning & Zoning Administrator Cktober 12. 1994 SUBJECT: #1%9 City of Orono, 1355 Brown Road South - V^ariaiKC - Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB. Single Family Rural Residential, 2 acre. Application: Request for front yard setback variance for construction of a parking lot to serve the Crystal Bay Post Office. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owiiers List D - Survey/Site Plan E - Hardcover Calculations F - Letter from Hennepin County Public Works 9/l6i94 G - Staff Memo of 9/12/94 H - Memo of 8/18/94 I - Pertinent Code Sections J - Area Topography Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.61, Subd. 4 - General parking requirements. 1 Section 10.61. Subd. 5 (A) - Setbacks for parking in residential districts: ". . . open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a required yard except that such parking may be located in a rear yard to within 10' of an interior side lot line and to within 10’ of a rear lot line." (RR-IB Front Yard is 50 ) 3. Section 10.61, Subd. 9 - Design and maintenance of parking areas. 4. Section 10.61, Subd. 10 (G): Parking requirement for any "Post Office" is ten spaces Background The Crystal Bay Post Office was constructed in 1960 and acquired by the City around 1980. It is the only remaining structure of the Crystal Bay government complex, and is iniende to continue in use a.s a post office for the foreseeable future. The pi>st office has ne\er had a formal parking lot, and its customers, the raajorin- of which are Cr>’stal Bay area residents, have cither w alked up or parked haphazardly on the shoulder in front of the building. The Public Works Department is pn>ps>sing to coastruct a h>mial parking lot with a drive-through letter drop and eliminate parking on the slKHikkr. The standards for a parking lot in the RR-IB District require a 50 ’ from setback. Since the existing building is totally within the 50 ’ front yard, aral its only public entrance is on the from of the building, a contorming parking lot would have to be directly west ami to the rear of the building and waxild be inconvernem for tte public. Funher, such parking lot would severely encroach into the existing Ciystal Bay park and pla\ground area. An ingress egress driveway would ha\e to cross the from yard in order to reach such a parking lot. PropiKed Layout and Construction Please review the site plan. Exhibit D. The proposed parking lot will be on the south side of the building and provide five parking stalls plus a handicapped stall. A mail drop drive through is proposed with the northerly curb cut as entrance aiKj southerly curb cut as exit. It is anticipated that the parking lot will consist of of gravel base and 3" of bituminous surface. It is intended to be surfaced up to the building w ith concrete curbs at the head of each stall. The intent is to leave a 5’ walkway adjacent to the south side of the building. The p.irking lot w ill be striped, and it is anticipated that the apnm in front of the building along County Road I4b will be posted no parking. The informal gravel pat king area on the nonh side of the building will be reverted to crass. Note that while the code would require a minimum ten space parking lot for a new post office building, history has shown it is rare to see more than two or three cars at the Cry stal Bay Post Office at one time. Use of the post office is not anticipated to increase significantly. Impact on Neighboring Propertie.s At its priiposed location, the par ’ ing lot will have minimal impact on the existing Crystal Bay plaviiround. The proposed parking lot is 34’ from the side lot line with the adjacent residence to the south. There is existing screening south of the parking lot. site which is appropriate as a buffer to the neighboring property. Including Only Lots 1. 2 and 3 south of the closed Prospect Avenue, hardcover in the 500- 1,000 ’ zone will increase from 5.6% to 12%, where 35% would be allowed. This area is relatively fiat and drains generally eastward to the Dakota Rail right-of-way and then northward eventually to a wetland in the Fox Mill area. No special drainage considerations are anticipated to be needed at this time. Staff Recommendation Please review the description of hardship and unusual property conditions. If Plannmg Commission agrees that the proposed parking lot location is acceptable, then a recommendation for front setback variance approval would be appropriate. Planning Commission should note any appropriate conditions of appro\*a! Options for Action 1. Approve as proposed, with or without conditions Table for more information 3. Recommend denial (state reasons). 4.Other CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Applicauon Fee $200.00 <$50.00 per each additional vamiKe) Rcntv’il VariarKC Fee $100.00 (do change from original application) Variance for non-confonning structures >*00.00 After-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee) A^h legal description to application if not included on required sur%ey. naCProperty Acquired. S^o^o not) also own use of property: ____ Zoning District: 1 (month/year) X Is of land. _ X other(speciriO \cSirC'pf^C^^ -------------------- Cm’: ___--------------------Address:__________________________— --------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address: p.Q. B>Cr< Phone(home)_ _____ - Phone (work) Cirv:(^ _____Zip:_jjV^2.,.^ DESCRIPTION OF REQU^T ^ JX A * 1 (f Estimated Construction Cost $. '^c'scriberequcstuidetail: So-<rU r(>e._g£ Poi] ------- ----------------------r' ^ ■- roj 1-f -----------------r (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area ___Lot Width ^ Setback: ^ Front __Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF LTSXSL^ f**°'’unJsLfwoM™?OTditioas preventing Describe undue hardship or practical d.ft.culty or unu^^ "eo ' t would ^ cotnoliance with Zoning Code requirements: Meet rno 50 ■etback place parking lot within existing public playqr'^und n Inqress/ecress driveways vou^<^ have t.Q be rnnsfrnrtofi in tha setback area even if setback is r-et,., (attach additional sheets if necessar>’) required submittals All of the f^iinwimr infomution irmst be submitted bv tht? appUcation-deadline date in order for %our qppHfation to be conjidefftl yQmplgttl ✓ Completed Application Form ^— “7 Certified Propert)' Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepm County Department of Finance. A-603, Gov’t Center. 348-3271). y Plat Map (obtained with propertv owners list). 7CenTicate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 ‘A* x 11" for Topographic surv ev (e.xisting and proposed elevations) if any changes m existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy x 11" for reproduction.J'- ^Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy x 11 ) 7 List of the legal names (include marital sums) of all persons with an interest m the nroperty. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). m addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City sutt. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember lhat your — ■.pnli. ntinn is not comnlete if Ihe above infnrmmwn hM P'»t hee'lJ-nijH<lai The applicant hercbv acrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning AdmWstrator. atirees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by “"S'”'f” and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this appheauon and cetnnes thal the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature ?h™em^^^ and agrees to this application -U.^nher entry onto the propertv by City suff. consultants, agents. Commission members, and CouncU members for purposes of investigation and venficaiion of this request. Owner’s Signamre Date Applicant must have all subtmtuls into the City olfices. Mondav of*each month. Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are h . .».« planning Commission AppUcants must be present at all scheduled review raeetmgs of the Pl^mng^^ and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a & Zoning Office of to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Bu.ldmg & Zoning umce this change prior to the meeting. 8 « (5) rf • \3T • ^ /o-ni-zz '^1 T47.40»V «ni' g (r»)J Mi*#^ ■;*•*<* _________________________ u A ’«0. 'ti- f®rjERm^iA CUTSTAL A\it a ) / 8 / '"b^ r~ A £cr:<c ts^ I 9 ' ^ l<^ » (i ®(53;‘m • ^5 3*3 \ .4.? ’* V • f ^ f€0 RD !iO 5>')----- 1 ■■ ^fO' U^"T Jo-tn-n // d>oo2^Zr-N‘____ AfAJ S^iSTDi, /om-i» il OOlba *7T«*4 ff, f/)uir€_ A<aJ «*2Jia-®ovr _______ _ ,P.O- s«»i*’ CT2Z.J -in ”i5 dovt ^C-/TV ^/*o*0 ___u. .........r _ &4<*r /l^Aj iiTiZJ ___ fc-fn'ZJ s/ c^y§. »WCf AJ/i^C £««WNt <2^,Us*^i^K^ f'^rj m^//&-/n‘Lx 3iTiHi ^ ^iC4ST>^ ^0'jnit*“ i^QO S^rLm*-«A*^J iT^I»\ XJ A>ro smi/ fo-tn- xz If ooTt CAACtA ?^c^/N CAHtrtL. d*y yw/J rrsza /? :f/2^i2\^LDoS¥ _ijP.f,_ \,____yac-r . -tl -■C’—Ie a<aj 5vjr?./.fi-ll'l: i\ Jll S3 __.'j _ -/•^'A4 rv-. Aii_ E «- r_ ..................... -./o*/n —i3 __Af&ATfQut ^OS , - . ______ Af^ ^xzz l?'*0' ?J>_?/ Jo-in-ii 2l c>oV7 ........../o^tn xi ^/cyzsz. _ C«r^ Ol^ ^At«HC> ............. PirTittlVfi I^Oi ................ .<V»ir*w __________________________ Il ^./seoi'/Wmeie /JoATU. ^^'yf_ ______ .hdarJ\lL.M ^ i?i£f -T^JtuC#,.- .(#C» J-.C.. L'lj^^C* Ar^i Sij___ /o-n>7\ yotoo g.g- 5 ^ •<• /fl./n-2u^~?( ^o47 __ C tl3_ ______ ^ ( Pj_^OV^C _ __ ^/tV’S'TfcC |&®»f /H*^ ^iZ-2 . 7N0JiHtnA.A^^______' C0^Cr**^ <*>7 8 u ‘SI '8 z OF LOT 3. BLOCK 1, MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • • « S B9*20'3<fE 79 fB N 89* 20'1^ 9 16'^ecrji/r^/ fS^ MsrkVftf^ • • 1 1 1 ' 4 7^ SB 1 * * • Ai •f LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: Lot 3. Block 1, MARKVILLE o: denotes iron marker Bearinys shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of and existing shed thereon, the location of an existing buil'ding on the adjoining property to the North, and the proposed location of a proposed parking lot. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 09 Oc / •ISS71 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR to' I Cw 88 Uj 8 CITY OF ORONO OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1. MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • ^ seno'scTE l75 Markyi 79.se Ne9*20>2Q"W •* % **•*. / sr •t LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: Lot 3. Block 1, MARKVILLE o: denotes iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of and existing shed thereon, the location of an existing buil'ding on the adjoining property to the North, and the proposed location of a proposed parking lot. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. C offin & Gronberg , Inc .I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota I \i\vov ■rviu: Mark 5. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12/55 DATE ?-27-W FittJ^rk 1 -io SCALE r:20' JOB NO 94^-291 a 74-79/ ' ■ HARDCO\XR CALCXXATION WORKSHEET OF 2^W SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ON"E) ^ f^i^yynNG ha RDC^^TR IN ZQ^ ^ A. ttaas®- ------------ * ■ L*»rt % X X Widdx IOO& S.F. _________ S.F. S.F. B. Garage ___ «?T-nveway D. Sidewalk PF-ioT E. Patio. Deck F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic G. (Xher X % X s X X X X X Ho.Soo ■70 total hardcover in zone total p^ope ^are a in zone ^ ^ , ,00 ^/6-S jS-Js. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % proposed HARPCpyTR ES ZONTi A. House ______________ Leogth —Hi.-----X X X Width /eo& B. C. D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic CaO /6>2>Q 3>o H2. G. Other X X X X X X X X X } Z^CoO fSL HO. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTALP^g^A IN ZONE ^ , ,00 13 ^1*7 ^mm iO .iJSuaO. A B S.F. B zsy» Hennepin County StP z 1 C September 16, 1994 Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Orono P 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 CS^°14l^ii!t*'slde'aJpjLiIItel^ 240 feet north of North Shore Dr Section 10, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 2181 Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Gaffron: We reviewed the above site plan and make the following conments: • The location of the proposed access, approximately 34 feet north of the loSth lin^of lot 3 is acceptable. The developer must have an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning J* The developer should contact Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548 for permu forms. • As a safety benefit after the parking lot is J^QffUeorohibit parking on the road shoulders in front of the Post Office, mc the City’s request, by Council resolution, Hennepin bounty w p and install no parking signs along the shoulders of CSAH 146. • All proposed construction within County right of way iitilitv nermit orior to beginning construction. This includes, b no ’ §»?na 0 an^ utility emitlandscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for utility permic forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way, disturbed during construction. Please direct any response to Doug Mattson. Sincerely, Thomas D. Jo^son, P.E. Transportatt5n^Planj,tn^,,tj;g[ie^V„,l,^ TDJ/DBM 32^^ \\'a>hin»4ton Avenue Smith Hopkins. Minnesota 55343-8468 (612) 930-2670 FA.\:(612) 930-2513 TDD;(612) 930-2696 TO:Planning Ci'mniisiion Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron. Asst Planning & Zoning Adminisirator DATE: September 12, 1994 SUBJECT: #1969 City of Orono. 1355 Brown Read South - Variance - Public Hearing Requested Tabling This applicacion U for variances for cons.ruc.ion of a parking lot for the Crystal Bay Offtce City Administrator has requested the item be tabled umd the October meel.ng while plans for the parking lot are further developed. ch r request for council action DATE: August 18, 1994 ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: NaiTi^ Ron Moorsc Title City Administrator Admini^ator Reviewed: ///4; Agenda Section: City Administraton Report Item Description: Post Office Parking Lot A. , CouncU 'a.rr r .0 -r " « It - .ou.d appro.i^.e.y 34 fee. from the property line of the restdentul property to the south. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to refer the application for a selbacic variance, to enable the consimetion of a parking lot for the Crystal Bay Post Office, to the Planning Commtsston. u<j I o, uLUV^iv I, iviAHKVILLb <d[ r S 10.61 sum of four square feet per front foot of buildinq, Plus one square loot per front foot of property not occupied by a buildirq. No individual sign surface shall exceed 100 square feet. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date; 9-14-67 D. "B-l"r "B-2" and Height. Within the ,2" and "B-4" Districts^ no sign shall extend in height two feet above the highest outside wall or parapet of any building nor shall any sign be located any property line except that any sign over ten square project two feet Into any required yard area from the building. Source; Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date; 1-1-75 •B-1", "B- more than principal feet from feet may principal " or "I"E "B-3" and "I": Height. Within any "B-3 District no sign shall extend i.i height more than six feet in height above the highest outside wall or parapet of Kii^r^inn No slan shall be located closer than ten feet from any Subd 4 Purpose of Off-Street Parking and Loading Rpauirements? ’Regulation of off-street parking and loading spaces in^this Chapter is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public Jiqht-of-way and so to promote the safety and general welfare of the public ^by establishing minimum requirements for parking, loading and unloading from a,otor Sith the utilization oE various All ar“wn to scll^and dimensionedShall be accompanied by a site plan drawn co in indicating the location of off-street parking and loading spaces compliance with the following requirements; Source; Municipal Code Effective Date; 9-14-67 A Application of Parking Rules All Districts. In addition to the Regulations and requirements set ®fding this Chapter, the fol]owing regulations and off-street parking shall apply to the required and non-required off-street parking facilities in all use distric Source; Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date; 1-1-75 B. Parking Requirements Waived for Construction on September 14, _ c^ntpmber 14, 1967, butbuilding permit has been issued prior to Septemb ORONO CC 382 (4-1-84) r s 10.61 * ui K ,^orir h-»s not been completed shall be exempt from the TnVfter sta’-e^ parking requirements if the structure is started tlthTn “onths'^after September 16, 1967, and continaea to completion. C Existing Parking Not to be Reduced. Off-street r-.rwino soaces and loading spaces existing on September 14, 1961, shall not be reduced In number unless said number exceeds the requirements set forth herein for a similar new use. D Floor Area. The term "floor area" for the f --eiriila*'ino the number of off-street parking spaces ra be^he net uVabll floor area of the various floors, devoted sales services, office spaces, processing and fabrication exclusive of hallways, utility space, storage areas other than warehousing. E Seat. In stadiums, churches and other places of otLf IlSflL'seftlfg racUitie^^^ facility shall be counted as one seat tor cne pu h determining required parking. maneuvering area including access drives. G. Commercial Vehicle Parking. facilities accessory to motor vehicle over for the parking of passenger automobiles. lif^pnged trailer ;?5oO pounds gross capacity and no shall be parked or stored in a t^^tdential ^ loading, unloading or tender ing a serv i , operator of vehicle may be parked at the residence - facilities said vehicle. Under no g|el storage rf"/om°mL^urV/hTc\‘e%\n^r^t tr"the^^^mp'lo;^e ‘s’ Jw°„'er*:“-1 “ ir?usto%«^\rril^eVs rr^Scrur^nl e^Sents other than the home occupation permitted for that property. H. Location of Parking, parking in the "R" Districts shall be on principal building. Required off-street the same lot as the Subd. 5. Setbacks for Peking Required °£f-street parking in all districts shall meet the following requirements: ORONO CC 383 (4-1-04) dfiBaud&i F I' S 10.61 A. "R" Districts. Within all "R" Districts all vehicles normally owned or kept by the occupants on the premises aust have a garage stall or open parking space on the same lot as the principal use served. Garage stalls accessory to residential structures may be located anywhere on the lot other than a required yard area except that such garages may be located to within ten feet of an interior side lot line and to within ten feet of a rear lot line subject to Section 10.03. Open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a required yard except that such parking may be located in a rear yard to within ten feet of an interior side lot line and to within ten feet of a rear lot line. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 B. "B” Districts. Within the "B-2" District parking may not be allowed in any required yard or landscaping and/or garages shall be located in areas other than a required yard except that parking may be located in a rear yard to within three feet of the rear or side lot line unless the rear or side lot line is in common with an "R" District? then the setback distance shall be the same as required for the "R" District. Within the "B-l*’, "B-3" and "B-4" Districts parking spaces Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date; 1-1-75 C. "I" Districts. Within "I" Districts, off-street parking spaces shall be not less than twenty feet from any street right-of-way line nor less than five feet from any interior side lot line or rear lot line, except when a side or rear lot line is abutting an "R" District. Then, off-street parking shall be not less than ten feet from said lot lines. Subd. 6. Joint Parking. Required parking facilities serving two or more uses in the ”B" or "I” Districts may be located on the same lot provided that the total number of parking spaces so furnished shall be not less than the sura total of the separate requirements for each use and provided; A. The proposed joint parking space is within thirty feet of the use it will serve. B. The applicant(s) shall show that there is no substantial conflict in the principal operating hours of the two or more buildings or uses for which joint use of off-street parking facilities is proposed; and, C. A properly drawn legal instrument approved by the City Attorney, executed by the parties concerned for Doint use of off-street parking facilities shall be filed with the City Clerk. Said instrument may be a three or more party agreement including the City. ORONO CC 384 (4-1-84) $ 10.61 C ,K^ 7 Control of Parking Facilities. When required ?f;tr;et parking facilities are provided elsewhere than accessory off-street p ^ served is located, written on the lot on which the ptincip^x off.gtreet parking shall be JV^^S^^^/th^the'^City so as ^to^maintain the required number of off- strLt^arking Us"c\oVe"^^^^ l^^int* s1.alV"be ^Lca\ed the principal use or building served. qMh,^ a Storage Prohibited. Required ofC-streot Subd. ®- ,/5?gt?icts shall not be utilised for open parking space in storage of vehicles which arestorage of goods or for inoperable, for lease, rent or sale. Subd. 9. Design and Maintenance of Parking Areas. n Access. Parking areas shall be designed so as to provide an ^<3equate ^ thirty""fe^'t tn^lVth ®at"®the ^;a«s‘shVu“h?«%==ess“oV/ driveways ard not directly o» of a public street. B. Fractional Spaces. When r Slqns. Signs located in any Pat^l"9 dt^a necessary for oiderl^ operation of i^teT""" addition to accessory signs otherwise permitte . - f ■'11 of th^ area intended to be D. Surfacing. ° g ^^7,; fo^r or more vehicles utilized fial to control dust and drainage,shall be surfaced with material to conctox __ m - A F. curbing. All open ““'f fPtu*prVide “ designed to have head-in t^ atJd properly located to tire bumper or curb of project beyond ^he requiredensure that no part of any car will project y setbacks. Subd. 10. Required ^® gg^i[gted,* the^miniraura principal use of the structure served is as li^^ parking facilities (open or enclosed) shall d, a A Single Family Dwelling. .P®?,f’■ii• ?B*. Multiple Dwelling. Two per dwelling unit. ORONO CC 385 (4-1-84) s 10.61 C Motel, Motor Hotel, Motor Court or Hotel. Four spaces plus at I'east one parking space for each guest room proviaed in the design of the building. D School, High School Through College. At least one parking space for each seven students based on design capacity plus one tor each three classrooms. E Churches, Auditoriums, Undertaking Establishments.* At least one parking space for each four seats based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall. F. theater. Athletic Field. At least one parking space for each six seats of design capacity. G. Community Center, Post Office, YMCA, floor area In excess of 2,000 square feet of floor space principal least one parking space for each three hospital beds. structure. nurseries. Four plus one for each 500 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space principal structure. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 K. Office Buildings and Professional Banks, savings Institutions. At least one parking space 200 square feet of floor area. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 L Drive-In Establishments. At least space for each °a\'le^Jt "sr" parking spaces for each alley. N. Motor Service Stations. At least street parking spaces plus two additional off-street par mg p for each service stall. Service Establishments At least one off-street parking space for each 150 square feet o ne floor area. ORONO CC 386 (3-1-84) s 10.61 P. Restaurants, Cafes, Bars, Taverns, Night Clubs. At least one for’each 80 square feet of public floor area. ^ Q, Furniture Store, Appliance Store, Warehouse Under 15,000 Square Feet of Floor Area, Auto Sales, Grainho^uses, Kennels and Studios. At least one parking space for each 500 square feet irexcess of the first 500 square feet of floor area in the principal structure. R Auto Repair-Major, Bus Terminals, Taxi Terminals, Boat ’and Marine Sales and Service, Bottling Companies, Shop for Trade (employing six people or less). Garden Supp i Stores Building Materials Sales. At least eight off-street parking ’ spaces, plus one additional space for each 800 square feet of floor area over 1,000 feet. Including warehousing and all outside sales and storage area related to the sales and service functions. S Skating Rinks, Ski Areas, Dance Hall, Public Auction House, and Similar Recreational Uses. At off-street parking spaces, plus one additional space for each 300 square feet of floor area over 1,000 square feet. T Manufacturing, Fabrication or Processing of a Product or Material. At least fiur off-street one additional space for each 800 each ^"u^a^re'’Ve;r o?^r^a«lr t=hL\”^ Storage. Subd 11. Application of Loading Rules to All Districts. The regulation’s and requirements regarding off-street loadlr|g and unloading shall apply, to the required and appliclttSn of^?hesrrlqSirements‘\%rac\fona\%“^ is obtained, one loading space sL!rb“^vid4d for a fraction of on-half or .ore and no lading space shall be required for a fraction of less than one half. gnhH 12 Location of Loading Berths. All loading berths shall be’ 25 feet or more from the intersection of two street right-of-way 1iLs! lo berths shall not occupy any yard recjuir6iTi6nt bordering a street. Subd 13 Size of Loading Berths. Unless otherwise length, all loading berths shall maintain a height of 14 feet more. Subd. 14. Access to Loading Berths. Each l°ndin9 berth shall be located with appropriate P“f£ic. or alley in a manner which will least interfere ORONO CC 387 (4-1-84) 1 Vi>< oJ "X 964.9 ^ __1 _^ o o _L_ LJ-------------7 I 9 To:Ororxi Planning Cimimission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono CtnmcilmembcTS Ron M*x>rse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:CXrtober 12, 19^ Subject:#1970 Scott Mk'heal Wold, 3026 Casco Point Road - Comlitional Use Pcrmi» Public Hearing 2Umin{S District: I.R-IC requiring 1/2 acre in area. The property consists of 26.771 s f. Application: The Building OlTicial has called for the filing of a conditional use permit as filling proposed cannot be covered under the authority of a building permit. Refer to Hxhibit 1. The followinc ordinances are pcrtiiKni for this review. Section 10.02, Definition 13. Determination of Building Height - The vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or 10* above the lowest ground levef whichever is lower to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Topographic changes which elevate the adjoining ground level above the existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building height. It has been detennined at 22.5*. Refer to E.xhibit M. Section 10.03. Subdivision 21- As already noted above, the filing and grading activities have been determined to be not covered under the normal building permit as land alteratioas involve not only property but property to the west. Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75’ area = 6.371 s.f. No hardcover proposed. 75-250* setback area = 20,400 s.f. Allowed = 5.100 s.f. Proposed = 4,286 s.f. or 21.01 No variance is required. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - Application Addendum Property Owners* List Plat Map Neighbor's Ix-tter to Neighboring Property Owner to West and to City 1 Zoning 1-iIc #1970 October 12. 1994 Face 2 - Hardcover Site Plan G - Hardcover Fact Sheets H - Gustafson Report 10 5 94 I - Grading and Drainage Plan J - Soil Bi>ring Report K - Biiring Map ^ r> i c u,i •L - Preliminary Grading Plan Submitted with Preliminary Subdivision M . Street Elevation-Height Determination N - Side aiKl Rear Elevations Description of Request Aoplxani proposes consmiction of a new residence ihai will require removal of approximaielv 450 cubic yards of poor srrils and replacement with suiublc granular material. Review Exhibit 1 Applicant will store fill during construction to the southwest corner ol the nropertv. Review the grading plan. Exhibit 1. changes in elevation must prov.de posmve drainage away from structure directing drainage to ditch along the east side ol property line. Note grade chances at the south and east side of garage on property to west. Ihc plan would bring drainage to a catch basin that would drain via an underground tile across the rear yard ol the subject property to the drairuice ditch ut the e«.ist. Review Exhibit H The Engineer is concerned that the proposed grading plan will not provide adequate drainace or retention during heavy storms to protect lower level ot garage on lot to the west. The proposed elevations will not maintain the natural drainage to the et^t. Gustafson recommends that applicant provide a nw'dified drainage svyale instead of c underground pipe. He notes that if applicant preiers the underground pipe s>stem, that applicLt ’s encincer provide the necessary hydraulic infon.iuion to assure tliat it is designed to carrv' a lOO-y^ar storm frequency with a high water level at least one foot below the garage flw’r. 1 he City will ask for a permanent drainage easement over the drainageway at a mimmu width of 10*. Gustafson also cautions the building department in reviewing the foundation plans noting the results of soil boring #2 and advises of a potential settlement problem. The City is in receipt of a supportive letter from Mr. Terry Lindgrcn (owner of property to west) who supports the request to alter elevations on his property. BcUh Mr. Wold and N r. Lindgren will be required to file for a joint land alteration permit from the City when final . grading commences next spring. “tl 'fo'‘ ) I T 1 V 4 |f‘l • ‘•Ik ■ . i !■ ■1 i ■•i 1*'' • ' .. .! 1 ,« i ’:m. 1 •1 l.i ] b \ Zoning Fik #1970 Ocu>ber 12. 1994 Page 3 Staff Recommendation To recommend approval of the trading aral drainage plan pro. idcd by tdward II. Sundt to the following conditions; Isv 1.Prior to application being scheduled before the Council, applicant must provide a final cradine plan setting forth the method of conveying drainage trom lower elevations at w^alktHit on U)t 1, Block I thnnigh Lot 2 to the eastern dramaccway. This shall be achieved via an above ground drainage swale or below ground ti e system If below ground tile system is profHised, applicant must provide the rKTcessarv hvdraulic information for City Engineer ’s review. In any case before scheduling of this application before Council, the City Engineer must have the final grading plan to review and approve. Erosion control shall be installed and maintained around temporary stockpile of spoils Erosion control shall be maintained as shown on the grading plan as required by the City staff or City Engineer throughout duration ot the building project and until natural groundcover is restored to all disturbed areas. Both owners of Lots 1 and 2, B\ock 1, Kelly 2nd Addition shall jointly execute a land alteration permit to be obtained at the City before final grading can bectn. 4. Others recommended by Planning Commission members 1 r cm' OF ORONO - GENER-\L LAND USE PROPERTi’ LOCATION Site Address 30^^ t *rr Type of Application to be Filed Propc.lN' Identification Number (P.I.D.) ( ^ i""--' •• X ^ .. -.i applica: Name Address2^ipo-L^\g>i /v Phone (borne) ^f-'72L2. Phoae (ut)rk)~ Zip_______ OWTsER (if different than applicant) Name A- »<Vv Phone (hc«r.e) Phone (work) Address Cirs’Zip Date Priyerty Acquired ___________ I (do)^^ n^also own the^djacem parcels of land FEES ♦ CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____SI25.00 Residential Accessor}' Use ______S2'^'^O0 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ______S170.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ______$150.00 Duple.x CreditPIdg ______$250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration ^.^rading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain V/ \jT Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ___ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-thc-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____S200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (-f consultant fees) _____$250.00 Vacation ______$175.00 Easement V’acation S 75.00 Easement V’acation With Subdivision ______$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ______$100.00 Appeals ______Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District ft. - / ^ Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) (month/vear) rrTy i\c............Will L'MW'IIU i'.njAKre rrrr.-rIte ^ ^ f A ^ f AnHnCu L'f~r ILL ( •# if'iiiV -4 w'w'Vi;. V W'V •crrY f*ri( t. * *k. Wl^TL ■•.■o ,v-i.VN' ■ i^V » M I I* f %.' • VV' - ThAI\iA r'CJ CCJl .IJi ~U: 2. '-V3. require *^ submittals 1 V/ Completed Application For^ J r Describe request in detail V ___ — _ . ___T YCf t’4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. t in detail.v Certified Propert>' Owners List of O'KVcn within 350' (you can obtain this list from tr Hennepin Department of FinaiKC, A-603, Go>-cmmeni Center. 34S-327I). “ Cemfic^te of Surrey (signed by a licensed sur\eyor) - refer to handout for sur\ey / iS’ortte mariul sams) of lU persons with an intetesi in ^ orooenv. TOs would include namefsl of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).d^ K / Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). ~:T AS an addendL to this appltcaiion. please aruch .i separate list of any other persons ■ vou wish notified of Lhis application.VOU UUtaiiwsa V ---------------- S^mS (S?ff wUl requue to scale drawtngs of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Aoolicant and Prepertv Owner must sign this application. Please rrtnember that your a'^plica^ton “not cornplete if .he above tnrormation has nor been utclt-dc, Cerriftcatton by Clerical Department that Und Use Apph^non is complete. Iniiidls of Clerical _________—— ---------------~ ~ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE „f^pnntion reauired or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees to provide all covered bv orieinal fee payment) Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (sta j certifies that the information and/or unusual expenses incurred m review of JPP supplied is true and c^ect to the best ot his/h^knowledg^ . , 0\\TSTR’S SIGNATURE and further authorized reasonable The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this p? -onmussion members, and Council entrv onto the propert)' by City staff, consultan^. agen^ members for purpU of investigattpn and venneatton of^ request. Owner’s signamr^ Date Applicant must have ill submituls into the City offices y* Aopiicants must be presenr at all scheduled Commission Meetings a'-e held on the third Monc^y o ® aoolicant is unable to attend a scheduled m«tmg. review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. advise the Building &. Zoning Office please nuke srTsegemtsu to have an auihorued agent attend in y»nr place an of this change prior to the meeting. iinndc Land ilur««yine Int;. tOWAAOM SUWOf A L S A»fStOf>«T A i s SA vtcf Affis A L S SA ¥»Cf AAf » SCOTT J SOu**Li» A L S VtC€ A«€S 9001 E Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, MN 55420 (612)881-2455 FAX 612/888-9526 September 12, 1994 »n»rcs«t9N«i, tt«Tic<tl I SeiAvt tNG lAMO HTlf SUAWt^S COA»%TA\^CtK>«l SvAVC vMHO C A O $f AVIC6S emOFORONO Post Office Box 66 Crystal B.ty, Minnesota 55323 Attention: Ms. Jeantre Mnbusth, Bldg. & Zoning Adminisfrator ri 0 ’u Re: Conditional Use Permit for Grading Sc Filling on lx>t 2, Block 1, KELLY 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Mn. Dear Ms. Mabusth: Enclosed are the following: 1. ) A photographic reproduction of the Certified Plat Map 2. ) A copy of the September 1990 Preliminary Plat land grading Plan as submitted to the City in September of 1990. 3. ) A "Certificate of Survey" prepared by Sunde Land Surveying, Inc. show'ing the proposed house. It is my client’s desire to apply for a Conditional Use Permit in order to excavate the basement and foundation of the proposed home which he is building on this property. Due to the soils located underneath the house pad, it will require approximately 450 cubic yards ot poor soils to be excavated and replaced with suitable material in order to prepare the house pad for actual construction. My client wants to store the excavated materials on the southerly and westerly -ide of the house until the foundation has been brought up to grade and the soils from the excavation will then be spread around the house for backfilling purposes. In order to control and retain any and all runolf which may occur from the excavation area, my client will place a silt fence as shown on the survey in order to contain any erosion runoff. Should excess materials be encountered and severe overages occur in the excavation area, this excess material will be trucked to an off site area. Soil borings in the area indicate an approximate depth of 6 feet ot poor materials and this will be exchanged for crushed rock or recycled concrete underneath the house pad area. The enclosed Preliminary and Grading Plan prepared by Ron Krueger & Assoc, and as subrnitted in September 1990 for review by the city Staff, indicates a walkout house pad is appropriate for this lot and after my evaluation of they property, I have concurred that a walkout will be suitable tor this lot. The grading that is being considered will not adversely affect any adjoining pro|x:rty or strc*et right-of-ways. mm MTf NCMNtriN•ATCfl wnMOP ADM ONNil HMi TAWAVIi HAK/AOMfMMli NANE TAXPAYM MAMi/ADmpnop AomTAXPAYCK PMP AOM ^CM« NAME TA)9AYCA ^ MAMI/AOm Xk- PMP AMP ' OMMIt NAM TAXPAYER ’NANE/AOm SC}. . Si M-nr*t5 A? OMA OOOSa Azxmss UNASSX9CO NCMiRiN roRmrio land WNREPiN ropmno landNOT roll SAtCAMDER NATfR IN LME itnuisi ti-lir-ts AT D015OSSSS IVY Pt D| HAMUXS MALLS JR Dt NAREfUIS MALLS JR XfSS IVY PL MAYTATA MN SSS91SR TP-117-X1 AS POST ODOSa ADORES ONASSIMEO A V GLOVER ET At CO-TRUSTIES ALVIN CLOVER ETAO E ESTH ST NIBBING m S7AA SB EO-117-IS AS OOAA 0STS7 CASCO CIR DANA A NALHRAST DANA A NALMRASr SIB7 CASCO CXRCLE HAYZATA ffl S5SY1 SB TO-U7-ES AS OOAf eSSDf CASO CIR L t J BRUSTAO LANRENCE L BRUSTAO SSOY CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA HN SSSYX ' WW ADOII OM«il NMC TAXPAYCK NANtyAOM f TOTAt MTCH 002 00035 m f:?M •R'3 ■ county «OPf RTY INrOWATXQN SYSTEM PROPERTY OMNERS USTSB »-117-iS AZ OBZA 0S5X5 XVY PL B t CUNNINGS ANN CVtPnNGSi DANIIL L A NAJmiA H ClffltNGS 5575 IVY PI HAYZATA Iff 5SSYISB fO-117-ZS AS 0QSS OSOAB CASCO POINT H J N HOGAN ETAL JONH A SUSAN H06AN A45Z EMERSON AVE S HPLS fBI SfABPSB M-Ii7-7S AS OBAf 0S277 CASCO CIR LIE OEINliT ETAL LEE OEINERT SZ77 CASCO LANE MYZATA m sssn SB ZO-117-zS AS WAS 0SIf7 CASCO CIR D A H OAS DANIIL O A MADONNA J OAS SZY7 CASCO CIRCLE HAYZATA NN 553A1 SB ZD-117-15 AS 0051 OSOSA CASCO POINT RO T N STArrORD A C A STAFFOm TMHAS N STAFFWO SOSA CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA HN 55SY1 ttPORT NO. PI%S5AD1PAGESB Z0-117-ZS AZ OeSA DS5A5 IVY PL JEFFREY A DfMA DANDttifY JiFFRET A KBRA DANKIRY S5A5 IVY PL HAYZATA ffl SSSfl ^ ^ 4 . V•It **■/ V •vf'■ *» ^- T1 u' hrSB Z0-1I7-IS AS QOSi DSOSB CASCO POINT RO B L I J B GIBBS BEfBRETT L A JILL B GIM 5DS8 cAso pomr RD HAYZATA MN SSSfl • •SB ZO-117-tl AS OMS 0SZ77 CASCO CIR LEE GEINERT ETAL LEE GEINERT SZ77 CASCO LANEmYziTA MM sssn ■* A•V'.J:,.;■ '♦--i'■? A -. < r i . . V,• # * •l 38 20-117-23 43 0048 0330S CASCO CIR . • V NELSON ADR MELSOH •RIAN V A OA»84 R NELSON 3305 CASCO CIR HAV2ATA fM 5S5Y1 I? % *•; I ^ 5t .. , J A r 4 A- . iffiir *'■ SB rO-117-ZS AS OBSA 0S505 XVY PL M E LANG ADI OQHEZ THOMAS A LEISEL COX S50f IVY PL HAYZATA m 55Sfl •A * M -1 ’ .i. ■. r ]• 'il'»• ». H .f1* ^-M' .'■ i '■1'* k I 7 .< -w- "j, • »’■ ■ r I * . ‘ 'r; *• -A* ' V •'J V K ' I : ' ri J. \ .. . . . % r* V * 3 vi I • ♦ 7*- Vi V;*?' . r't ^ 'TA»n taJ»'..VJljV*.-, 'i?*'‘TAXR i ■' » . K OMC /•nr’’; ■*': ww ";tA» •.:**i*y ^ ' ■y.r■ , ‘ Aa: :r: <^,r * I; ^;v1 '. •‘/'•■'.* . ■. * ^V.r :V<:v^■U‘ •’t Cr'':-•'-. :yyr\.A;. A-r v' 'fc ;4k{I.yvr S.7 <; U .'V..'?'.' iris'-. 1,' V .. i 'F ■4?' ’’•V■■ ■lie ’ f f' U W:0r f; ft- ■y'- • ^ .• Ik- ffUN OATI Of/I%mMTCH tmC ■iF""’m MOP MM CM€« MAMI JTAMmPy,wm/BiSm;v 1 -rfr MOP UWTAXPmPMM/AM; V‘>SOMM HttC /TikPAYIK M^NiHC/AOn ■% mar um 7:^»tw*yct . - • ».1 . , ammn wm ‘’Ljr^TAXMYM NAm/Aom ‘V; J :mop ADM jiv:;OMlD HAW TAXPAYIA MAW/AMDs n • •«■ A Si W-117-n SI D9S§ itMi CASCO POINT PO KOMtT C LAPIHSRX AND MFC MMHT C tAPINSAX 29A8 CASO) POINT KAO NATZATA m 5SST1Si zi-nr-25 si dmiOtfM CASCO POINT AD C M NAKK i P HLAUN NAACI^ C H MAACfC A P NUtlEN Hkkm CPiO CASCO POINT PD fttYZATA HN 55SP1Si zo-iir-n s% coos0S0I5 CASCO POINT PO P 6 UUPII CTALn i lAUPicSil5 CAKO PT to MAYZATA m SSSPl Si Zi*117-2S Si Mil 0S0A5 CASCO POINT PO P J JCPOAC A J r JCPDEC POKPT 0 A JiANNC ^POCI SMS CASCO POINT POAO NAYZATA MN SSSfl Si tD-117*ZS Si DOli OSiSS CASCO POINT IP JOm P DENNIS ETAl JOHN P A EVY C DENNIS SD5S CASCO POINT POAD NAYZATA MN S5SP1 Si ZO-117-2S Si 002S 0S020 CASCO POINT PD i LXNDGPEN JP A i tINOGPEN E LXNDGPEN JP A i LINOGPEH SOAO CASCO POINT RO OPONO HN SSSfl ‘t roimPIH COUNTY PfCTElTY UTOIOTITIOI STSTCTOMEPS LISTSi ZD-117-ZS SI C0Si •2MO CASCO POINT POEPAOLEY C PAUf iPADlEY C SAPHE SS17 ilPCNCWST DP MAfiTATA m SSS^lSi 20-117-2S Si 0001 esoss CASCO POINT PD T ifPTMIAUHE/C fCACPfNMEISTtl TNOKAS i ifPTHIAUHE SiSS CASCO POINT POAO NAYZATA MM SSSTlSi W-117-2S Si 0005 OSiiS CASCO POINT PO CUPTIS J ENQLliZ) ETAL CUPTIS J ENGtUNO SOfS CASCO POINT P0 NAYZATA MN 555^1 Si 20-117«2S Si 0012 DSM5 CASCO POINT PO P A PASTENS A i C PASTEW PICNAPD A/iAPiAPA C PASTEfe SOiS CASCO POINT PD NAYZATA m 55Sn Si 20*117-21 Si 0021 02Ti7 CASCO POINT PD JAMES P A CATHEPIN6 HAPTZELL JAMES P A CATNEPXNE HAPTZELL 2187 CASCO Pt RO NAYZATA MN S5S11 Si 20-117-2S Si 002A 0S02A CASCO POINT PO SCOTT M MOLD SCOTT M NOLO 1721 DORSET U EDEN PPAIPIi MN 55Si7 itPOST ». PliSSiOI PAGE AIB »-lir-2S 11 OMi 02170 CASCO POINT PD J A i MARTINSON JERRY A MMNII MAPTIN9GM 2170 CASCO POINT PO S NAYZATA MN 55SHSi 20-117-21 Si Mif 01025 CASCO POINT PO P 0 HCGANN ACL NCGAMN THEODORE IDIN 1025 CASCO POINT PD NAYZATA m 5IS11Si 2i-117-2S Si Mli 0SM5 CASCO POINT Pi GLORIA i MTZfNKTH PIN A LAURA OOTZENPOTN SOiS CASCO PT PO NAYZATA m 55S11 Si 20-117-25 Si MIT OSOil CASCO POINT M DORIS MOLITOR-NATEPS TODD NATIPS soil CASCO POINT PD NAYZATA MN 55111 Si 20-117-21 Si Mli OSOOS CASCO POINT PO JAMES P A CATWPXNE HARTTELL JAMES P A CATNfPINE NAPTZELL 2107 CASCO PT PO NAYZATA m 55111 Si 20-117-2S Si M27 OOOSi ADDRESS PENDXNO JAMES P A CATNEPXNE NAPTZELL JAMES P A CATHERINE NAPTZELL 2187 CASCO POINT PO MAYZATA m ISSll Yf.'I I *V*jS^ \ jr • »V f; * • ■ ■ r ^ . - • • ■ - ,. t- • .’I' H'-iii •« 'i* r-V •. .v‘->; iW-: . (3)ox Vi (fxvYv'(i2) V>\ VXi‘C OOC •« 5475^9 -23- % > M 5'^Information Distribution Systems ft Services MvractArvteidstebaMiwidiinlbmMtfoncwiiar -ri 't-4 A7^ «* _ - <9 y acf 3t>i-Cr C } ■*^'' v-^ -'■// —^ ■ /4/t /L*-* xilr ^ # t-«#»^/2V L/^^yo^/afKf j/r/ - Sales; 612-471-8482 ~ FAX 612-471-8454 3020 Casco Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 For «n /nd*x c«« 6l2-47f-09M, &t 109 (hav9 your FAX # Mitn ■I)-'' I -in ( I ^ - llII ■I »1 8 S 8 '8 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR CITY OF ORONO OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1. MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ««••• S09‘2O‘3OrE \’73.Y7m%a.i</rti t75 Mcrkvi; * *..** 7^.S8 NB9^20*30''W LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: Lot 3. Block 1. MARKVILLE o: denotes iron marker Bearinys shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of and existing shed thereon, the location of an existing buiTding on the adjoining property to the North, and the proposed location of a proposed parking lot. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. i ■ k " Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. It—T—. i' ■' ' ' • I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision. and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Und Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota r- n i' Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 1^55 y-27-a3DATE SCALE r:20* JOB NO. 94‘-29l I (7 0^^ Hf^RDCOVB^e tA LC(J • r SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE FOR WOLD CONSTRUCTION NOTES & LEGEND 933,6 Denotes existing elevation (933.6) Denotes proposed elevotion Proposed gorage floor elevation = 942.5 Proposed front house entry elevation = 945.0 Proposed top of block elevotion = 944.0 Proposed bosement floor (wolkout) elevotion = property DESCRIPTION Lot 2, Block 1. Kelly 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 935 0 The proposed elevations and proposed house location are subject to review and change by the City Engineer. Building Dept., developer ond owner. Proposed grodes ond house locution which are approved by the City are finol. JV NOTE: A REVISED SURVEYOR’S CERTIFICATE WILL BE PREPARED AFTER THE SOIL CORRECTIONS TO THE LOT HAS TAKEN PLACE. ■v. / DRAINAGE iS UTILITY EASEMEI I L.W I ^0 / 75 FOOT SET BACK LINE -/i 'EXIST. 2 STOR' CAR. ,953.7 7 / ■PROPOSED DRAIN TILE LOT 2 PI > I X. 2W7 I SO. FT. 94l.8j / 7 T0 1^> I / 5 • C 3 V CALCi/LAT70*J ^^^V936.9 d). '0)^ 94: XpoI' /'20 woo a ^ f33.l 7 C939.0 93&-3^ 0^ We hereby certify thot this is o true ond correct representation of o survey of the boundories of the land obove described and of the locotion of all buildings, if any. from or on soid land. Dated this 29th doy of August . 1994 PTIQN on. according to the County. Minnesoto. *N r 9 V CRL c uiAT?aAj ) 0 t A Ssne\ M tip^ Atc F L Ph«ip eaawX ^ \H/ Wwiiiuii. Pf MiPn L Wk «mtA Pf Mtnjpt C Lvnt^. Pf Garf D K«*«aBSi Pf . t Mjidrut Pf P Po«p» Pf .<*rry C Pt trap ■ Pf kiJB J Pf L>ougNn i fgnoA Pf •»ofT«A P .^ndr^wn. Pf WiMp D OusaPnn. Pf Mart t AnPl Pf Cm.m cyni^ Pf Mart A Spf). Pf »■ JG Nc^iai» Pf C>Jf> W Miirw^T Pf tiTin P Gitur* Pf Paul J G^tfXjr\ Af A C>WM« A f Par««< J f^igman Pf Leo M PatMpoitv A ffrfe ictwna*. Pt Hanaro m Own J Ca'AMPf Pf Mart D Pf Mar^ B JCTiaen. Pf ;aron f f ngaPvjafli SURVEYOR’S CERTIFICATE FOR. WOLD CONSTRUCTION NOTES & LEGEND property description 933.6 Denotes existing elevation (933.6) Denotes proposed elevation Proposed garage floor elevation = 942.5 Proposed front house entry elevotion = 945.0 Proposed top of blocK elevation = 944.0 Proposed basement floor (walkout) elevation = 935.0 Lot 2, Block I, Kelly 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plot thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesota. The proposed devotions and proposed house location ore subject to review ft •j ^ ^ ./ (•' H) I 1 Sniide l-aiiel lac 9001 r Blorirnlnnton Vrppwoy (35W) Doled ‘his 29th day of August SUNQ l land surveying . INC. — . ' P f ^ * • 1994 By: oc < o r [ advance surveying & ENGINEERING CO. SURVEYING / ENGINEERING / GEOTECHNIOU, 5300 HisbMy lOI Sooth. Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone 474 7964 Fax 474 8767 3 r»> L i. I April 8,1994 Mrs. Carol Kelly 3026 Casco Point Road Orono, Mn Phone: 473—9936 Dear Carol: At your request, we have conducted a preliminar>’ investigation of soil conditions on your site at the locations you specified. The following is a tabulation of data about your site: Site Address:3026 Casco Point Road City 1 Orono, Minnesota Legal Description:Lot 2, Block 1, Kellv 2nd Addition Benchmark:Elevations provided bv client Datum:the North American Datum METHODS: The investigation consisted of exploratory soil borings to aid in identifying soil and water conditions. We have indicated the approximate locations of the borings on an attached site plan sketch Elevations are very approximate. Borings were taken with a truck mounted CME 45 drill rig using solid stem continuous—flight augers. Soils encountered in the borings w’ere visually and manually examined in the field by the soils engineer. TTie soils are classified on the basis of texture and plastricity in accordance with ASTM D24S7 "Unified Soil Classification System" and a chart e.xplaining that system is attached i7 recommendations : The firm, grey clay encountered in Soil Boring No. I at an e1e\’ation of 929 and the firm, black clay in Soil Boring 2 at an elevation of 930 is suitable for the support of a home. It is our opinion that these soils are capable of supportmg footings proportioned to exert a bearing pressure of no more than 3000 pounds per square foot. The soft clava, fill soils, and the top I foot of the firm, black clay are not suitable and should be removed by excavation from the area of the proposed home and from an oversize strip around the perimeter of the home of one foot in width for ev'cry foot from the footings down to the firm soil. Granular fill may tiien be imported and compacted in layers to support the home. The granular fill should consist of 100®o cnished granular material meeting the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Class 5 specification. Tlie most economical and suitable material for this purpose is usually recycled concrete. The fill should be placed and leveled in the excavation in layers no thicker than 2 feet and the surface compacted using a suitable vibratory roller until no fuither settlement is noticeable from further passes of the roller. Wlien the fill has reached basement footing level, the home may be built using conventional teclmiques except that the garage floor niust be supported by piers per the attached detail. '•' * I • I ' t • • i . TO; DATE: ^10 Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commissicn Members Ron Moorse. Cirv >VJministrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building Zoning Administrator October 7, IW SUBJECnr: #1971 Brian Kipfer 'Greg Sargent, 320 Tumham Road - CoiKlitional Use Permit Publk: Hearing Zoning District: RR lA. minimuni lot area is 5 acres Application: Applicants have been required to file a conditional use f^imit tor guest house use as proposed year rouiKl living area expansions within detached garage have potential for use as an independent residential unit. Pcrtincnl Ordinances Section 10.27. Subd. 3 (A) - Conditional use permit required for guest house use. Regular lot starklards shall be met. Section 10.27. Subd. 5 (B) - RR-IA lot standards. Required lot area for two residential units = 10 acres. E.xisting * 123,552 s.f. or 2.8 acres. N^iriance * 7.2 acres or 72^c. Definition 30 - Home Occupation. List of Exhibits A - Application D - Applicants* Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Building Permit #006450 E * lA)\vcr Level Floor Plan G - Upper Level Floor Plan H - Streei/West Elevation I - East/Rear Elevation J - Weekman .Memo 10/4/94 K - Survey Zoning File #1971 October 7, 1994 Page 2 Request for Conditional Use Permit Applicants propose the reconstruction of a detached garage/stable with a new two stor>’ garage with additional living area expansion. The footprint of the detached structure w ill be 38’x24’ with a first fltx>r level covered porch akldition at the south side of structure. The new structure will be constructed with the same exterior material/finish as the residence stracture. Per Exhibit B, applicants* addendum, applicants note that it is not their intention to create a studio apartmem or guest house within the proposed living space of the detached garage currently under construction. The issue for the building staff in doing the plan review is that the structure will have plumbing and heating and living space will be for year round use. There is a full bathriHvm on the lower level with a shower and the auxiliary rcnmi adjacent to the bathroom area shall be equipped with a large work sink. I he sink will serve the applicants with their painting/design projects. It is possible that this same type of sink could function for laundry and kitchen use. The only element needed to convert this structure to an independent residential unit would be the plugging in of a stove and refrigerator. The structure as proposed could function as independent residential unit. As noted above, the code would require 10 acres in area to support two residential units. The property consists of 2.8 acres and would never be approved for guest house use. The code does not address living space expansions within detached garages or other detached structures on a property. There are no code prohibitions or restrictions in the zoning code which disallow the proposed use. 'Fhe problem is the potential for violations of the zoning code with unauthorized expansions of the living space to more intense unauthorized use. Review Exhibit B as it relates to applicants' use of the studio area. The studio or work area for both applicants would appear to be accessorv to their principal employment serving as expanded work area/space. Issues for Consideration 1.The lot contains 2.8 acres and would never meet the area standard for a second residential unit. Does the mere denial of a conditional use permit being filed on the chain of title provide adequate controls for the proposed living space area? Should other modifications be made in the proposed improvement plan that would provide greater protection to the City for unauthorized expansions in use? Members shared comments on the following proposed improvements; Zoning File #1971 Ctetober 7.1994 Page 3 A.Year round use of facility. B.F’lumbing and heating. C.Potential use for bedrooms. D Bathroom with shower. E.Others raised by Planning Commission. 2. Would the propKised professional use of the auxiliary 4 3. 4. license application? Can the existing residei'ce be used for expansion to provide additional work space area? Review Exhibit K, note residence structure cannot be expanded on south and west sides because of ^substandard setbacks. Existing improvements on east and nonh side of residence ina)' pose expansion problems. This matter was not addressed in applicants’ addendum bui in conversation with one of the applicants at my site inspection, the specific chaiacter and design of existing residence was discussed. It may be impossible to expand existing residence without destroying character ot residence structure. What should be the City’s concerns when allowing living space expansions within detached structures? What kind of controls ere necessary to prevent future violations? Is a code amendment needed? Issues of Action To approve as proposed; or To approve as amended; or To table application providing applicants additional time to consider other options. The delay in this review may create problems for applicants for the garage currently being constructed. ,/jii f V t- J^ f cmr OF ORONO - general land IISKWPLI PROPERTI' LOCATION Site Address _ . F!<>^- Type of Application to be Filed ■WlON ^ A rrr"v r-c .‘i.v*iAj£ C-FFICtiJticocC'S) \;l u.i C\ 72.t. I Vi. ^ fI rr A I w‘ • . I — r V ^ OlfiI # * ^ * A i v*V Propert)’ Identification Number (P.I.D.) applicant r; V w c 1 r VVVil MW'J tV» Phone (heme) > f^T)____________ Pttone (work) (^7 j a 4* XC I TugAi^M fU>/o _ City ________ZipJ65SS^ ^^J&^P^iTdifferent than applicant) mm: ML&f* Phone (home)(_6>/2) 4-TsS*^4-^g ______ Phone (work) fu\7.) City pfyiiAC._______1 Zip ■_ _________ (monih-ty^ear) 1 (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. fees - CONDITIOiNAL USE PERMITS - ^ $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessor>' Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ^ V V $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments • $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land /'Iteration J- « : LV C -*• ' Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, reDining walls within /5 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee • Uv OTHER APPUCATIONS ‘ ■ ’ ^ ‘ ' ^2D5.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ______$250.00 Vacation . • • $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$300.00 Rezening (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment . V. . . . SIQQJDO Appeals ” Other - see F«*e Schedule / I PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District______ Present Use of Property’ X Residential ^ ' oaX^'nM.v-r^ Other (speclty). ! OaJLMruK>v<^ ' rn A' * T reqlired submittals 1. Completed Application Fonn. Describe request in detail. Certifwd Property OwnerS-lkiSt of p^wprs ,wjiluii^5(F* (ypu can obtain this list from Hennepin Ccwnty Department of Finance, A-603, Govcmme it Center, 348-3271). 4. Plat Map 2. 3. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey c^dnnation. ti * **' XttaJii legal description to application if not;^udcd,on,required-survey. ; • Hit m • • ___J_______________1 ______\ -/-i****? »_____i • I • 5 Cei iT ‘ • A-—.• . •v* ; • •; • irtfpmiation. • «L .ei -*» • * •• ’ 7‘V‘* • V Topographic suTvtyv'^existing aiKl,|vc?po:sed; cqnjjC^^V-if• land alterations involve As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of thi^^pplicatiori. _ YOU ARE Pi^QUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCL^IENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SL^BMITTED. (Staff v ill require to cale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please rememher that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Cenification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff;___________________________------------------------------—-------- APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE u ^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the ^oning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurrecTfe review of this application, and certifies that the information sup^n . J is true and correct t/Lh(t best of his/her knowledge. Applicant ’s signature r,Me sefir. (?<5- PPU/^7^ SIGNATUKb 4 K1 The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and fu^er authorize reasona e entry ci.iO the property' by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, an ounci members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s signature Date of this change prior to the meeting. - ' September 19, 1994 H \ b •J 'i To Whom It May Concern: It is our intent and hope to rebuild the current garage structure at 320 Turnham Road, Orono, MN 55359. In the restructuring of the building, we plan on keeping the two stall garage spaces much like the building is currently. We also intend to add additional space to provide us with an area to work on fine art and design projects. This studio space would allow us the opportunity to create in a more open setting with better natural light. 1, Brian Kipfer, am employed as a creative director for a giftware company. Midwest of Cannon Falls, located in Cannon Falls, MN, approximately 30 miles from Orono. I do bring artwork home to complete for my employer as well as enjoy watercolor painting as a hobby, but do not run a business out of my home. The addition of plumbing in the garage would allow me to paint without having to transport water back and forth from the house to the garage. Greg Sargent is self employed providing freelance graphic design, packaging, and computer training to companies in the Twin Cities. Meetings take place in the client's offices. Greg would use the garage for additional space for his personal computer and equipment. In both cases the building of the garage would not increase traffic or bring additional business to our home or neighborhood. It is also our intent that the structure be insulated and finished to allow us to heat and cool the work area but by no means is it intended or designed to function as a separate living space. The flooring is cement with some particle board sub-flooring in the work spaces. The batitroom is designed to function as a potting room for plants and garden materials and has a deep sink for cleaning paint brushes etc. We do not intend to rent out this space or use it for commercial retail, we also do not intend that it be used for a guest house or apartment. The garage space has no kitchen or food prep area and no bedrooms. We appreciate the consideration and interest in the project anc want to assist in any manner that we can to make it a reality. We will gladly answer any further questions or provide additional information. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincerjely, rian Kipfer Greg Sargent 1 i t ii Q;^ »tAIMMTf Ot/lfm'<l4.oosV* ‘ ‘' #«. •’. •vjfcf-«V-* " ' • • >■■■• '..'i4 ; i:::i\■■ 1 ”..VAOMTAXPAYER V M Si-11A>ZS IS 0002 •0A20 TURNMH RO L f KIIS A K H MM UOHAM) A MTMUEN H MRS «20 TURNNAH ROmarU rlaxn m ssssr’••v»i *; -4.--CT' \ #s * ^ -^ ■ * • • • *• si-llO-2S 24.0005 *'■ ^ oo42»^ turkw A m ro. ^fOMCR NAM . MXLUAN N STCHRCL CTAL «»li- TAXRATIR«.>« TIMPTWY N A AMU H OTTCM ,'^JNAM/AOOR V 42S ■njRMUH RO O.- l 1' • NARU RUUN HN 55550 RORCRXN COUNTY W»0»ttTY IHFORNATION SVSTtH RRORCRTY CMCRS LIST50 Sl-lIO-25 13 OCC3 04545 NATERT0lf4 RO DONALO R RfARSON A MXFE OOiaLD R RCARSON 4545 HATCRTOin ROAO MAPLE PLAIN t«4 5555058 31-118-23 51 008400385 TURMUH RO C E PHELPS A J C PHELPS CHARLES E/JEMttFER C PHELPS 385 TURNHAM RO 0 MN 55559%^S8bMH NAMl! TAXPAYEK NMi/AOOII n-lM-25 51 00X0 ‘< ADDRESS UNASSIWEQ HARY L RCTERSON ‘TAXPAYER UMOfl ^ *■%/ V •if'»% I■n-; y';.;Li. V: . V. . V: *• - . ' •*• ': 18 . B.VRROR .AOOR > 00S< /‘r ’%s5;Ysr> ^^nahe /A ddh J. - •; V 31-lia-E5 AE 0007 00540 TURNHAH RO DERHARO N GALE KRNARO' H GALE 540 TURNHAH RO NAPLE PLAIN MN 55554 i r %* ^50 51-118-25 42 0010 045X5 CHIPPENA U P ■w •, . aoor; CMIER NAM^ GREGORY NALLOIN ETAL ^ TA)(PAYER , GREGORY HAUDIN ‘ NAME/AOOR ^ 4515 CHIPPENA LANE PLAIN ffl . 55554 , \ ■' ■ ., •> . • .i- • V 118-23 42 0015 • M 'RMR. AOOR . - 04S80 CHIPPENA LA ^ t (MUR NAME - L E HARTXNEAU/J M MARTINEAU >u JTAXRAYIR, LARRY E A JEAN H MARTIMAU ‘ NAHE/AOOR 4140 CHIPPENA U .1 • 4 * 8l*}8 738 31-118-23 42 0003 04555 CHIPPENA LA FREOERICR E SHEHANEK JB ETAL FRED E SMENANEK RT 2 BOX 14NAPLE PLAIN M4 55354 38 31-118-23 42 0008 00380 TURNHAH RO 0 E « 0 F MERZ DOUGLAS E • DIANE F MERZ 380 TURNHAH RO MAPLE PLAIN M4 55359 58 31-118-23 42 0013 00320 TURNHAH RO 6 H SARGENT ABA RIPFER 6 H SARGENT ASA KIPFER 320 TURMIAH RO MAPLE PLAIN m 55354 TOTAL BATCH 005 00014 « . 58 31-118-23 13 000404245 MATERTCMI tO H K A N H PlLLNOItE K1LA:I a MICHELLE FILLMORE AZ4S MATERT0M4 RO MAPLE PLAIN tt« 5535938 31-118-23 31 000904455 HOLVERTON PL 0 P A R L GRANOSTRANO DAVIO P/RAREN L GRANOSTRANO 4435 NOLVERTON PL CRONO Ft4 5555438 Sl-118-23 4E 0004 04385 CHIPPENA LA J M FRITZLER ET AL J MARC FRITZLER AND OESVL L PETERSON 4385 CHIPPENA LA MAPLE PLAIN rt< 55354 SB 31-116-2S 42 0009 04325 CHIPPENA LA RONALD R DEMULLING ETAL RONALD R DEMULLING 4325 CHIPPENA LANE MAPLE PLAIN M4 55359 •EPdRT NO. P24SS481 M * J PACE 14 2 T- u.iMio* ? ''...■VA-Tt ,*■ < ; , ' v.'l •4“ V ¥ • • 30 31-118-23 42 0014 00320 nmNHAM RO 0 w SAPGENT aba KIPFER U H SARGENT ABA RIPFER 320 TURNHAH RO HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 . . . . . . . . . ..... . ;• V- ... -r -5,^5 . • v‘^ - .A;* ■ fc 'Wt*; • iuN un oiAt/M .-. A Ov : ,tATCM 00f t vl-;.*. rt S'BOfCHS COUNTY «KJPt«TY rMYOWUTIOM SYSTfHpttannTt ofcRS list<v-^. ■ '■.•■■ "f “ ' f ,• ■•’ *^ 1' L* ‘ ^ •.« ' k*-' ,•'.■■ '-li -i-'? ■Sri.-?.' v:^_■■4•^• ■«v..''t:' ■• ■ ■‘ti.Ji'3^' - y.',-:^ ->: i ■”>V.. *• ' I. mim. * ■ ' - '•■><;*•; '■*•• -V- ■ - ”" ■■ H V: r-*.’ A.;u, KPair m. mmoi •AOf »• </' ^ •• . * . : r ^wiiV.-t.': vl’-■■'* - J-’-iirf0¥mi-•l>*f % YV*!'if ■'f. • .. 'J *"•■■“•'■ *.j. •,-•*► “i(* V.'-.•:^-V .Uw. ^t^'4;. « • > *(V: ; >’Ti,. ,i 'V iX•' »r .'^1% P » • r • » • . t’ » ■ 5c '?•’ • Z CIUTIFY THAT TH£ FACTS »EA«CS€MTC0 ARC AN ACCUtATt AM) TOUf RCPREStNTATXOM OF INFOtmATlON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OCPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXAT10N» TO THE lEST OF HY KNONLEDGC AND KLZEF :5^iDATE *Vr,Sr IPARTHENT Of PROPERTY TAXATIONi T fboiM tiii 'y->> '■• . • V :■&•■■ 14. • ‘.>V V t - .i . A. ^ ■'^’^ ' \ ^ . .“4. • ri!.KiVii 1 cmr OF ORONO 27M KeSey Parkway - PO Box 66 Bay. Wrvwsota 55323 (612) 473-7357 PERMIT TYPE Pennil Nufri»f: Date Issued: BUILDING WbdSO 03/20/S4 tte address 320 TUR.NHAii PD p.i .n;-; '31-11?-1’5-42-C«:»13 ESCRIPTION DETACHED GARAGE Building Permit Type ACC/GARAGES Building Uc> r): T y pit UBK: Occupancy Construction Type GARAGE-DETACHED R-? vN i-TTV rr i~r,r,tn) yif^AffCE OFFICE a C4./1 W'W'VW A1 rc'J A WkTVA W'WV r..n r w* 7 • *# A i rrj TCT f I • 4 f *.*• ”*• *• * -* f*» I* WV'VV, - i rrvV^4 WWlY 40. JnI w f4G. i i <ElEIFT-;FA^K Yd} EMARKS *1.' V z 4. w . p, c-rpTr cppH^T CUP REC-UIF.ED TO ir ETAL- PLB«:. H0f“E OCCUPATMU pzr.....TV :::.r.UTr^P P^■p:RAY r.LCC.J^ I* • ____________•.. . . f. ..gj -------------------------------;-----------------iiJ I WiM ■ iXm-* ' I r Ml i—.m EE SUMMARY:VALUA'IUN ICO,000 Base Fee Plan Review Burcharge Total *^ee SR4’3 50 s:-;57 IS ■5Gi5*?1 V h L l‘ t: ri W ‘ J L‘ Q 24-?2B GLEN RD GHOREyOOD MN t’-ipplicaot - 14744155 55:? 31 SARGENT *•*•(■) OROMO oocTM/GpPG rURNHAM RD MN 55355 i/ *r I . } * fi.i .... * ,l ! . .. ,1 - I feLi ■■ . , •/ {•.ft *«V ^ J * vJ tf p?^: ■ ■Jv ' :: •!. ‘.V ii|i': •x'-o' ,;: o-'- V Pis III! ■h91§ 6 ^ i ■ •' '''^ ‘ V V. 1 V . ,' t V'H 5^1 ft ^ ^ ^ r >%■ i •; ' • "*i }*‘ •K* •It «».* ex. I m^sm: ■' ■ 'i‘ii’I'iil ■■'^ '• "•■ i*'^ “'•* V 'li'rJ* : • *.» • .• '*•• nT'i S|«p3v-ifPI i Wl^..W. o/ . xT:O • ’ . t . • t <1^ 4 ■■s! • ?^ • • .............................................................—:— L • --------------------------------- j|l4 ;|t_.----- liP^ :* 'i-s . ‘ ■ ‘7'x.; •i- 5>rA».V^‘r ; ..f; Jtrd ;V ■ I:.,.i '-I .. . . V " • : j:!'. i:^_; i _ ,:k-Lv I ' <5 ' ^> ' ' ' ■ 1 T I TA I llJ Jt • \ SSr iH •, * * -I i Jima I . ? mi.: «n^.1 X I • mx L' ?il« '•<. . l i : i a h?;s i K'ilfr'ulus.: * • A . \ t -ir- ■ \ •/ivr,iv . • ‘.C • •* ('• } i-V* •' • ♦** 4.3 . •. 1 r • .• V ia';'!:M » s'#. . »•• • 1 • V* i ■ ••'»l ‘ • • ■: ^' 1 ♦V^ ■ m >v -r;. ;4Ujf•; .“"I! 1. aJ • > nsI'i A''»« liV. 1 • I l'. ^ ,■*1 i. « J^’ Wi 1 i • { >1. ♦ f’i ;*.• I? fr' '1; ^ * , V V ' ■ ■ ’ %i i‘ *1. ‘ /\u* nzyvT;— 11 / Trrin .* ■! V/ •• ' ■> 4 ! I 1- ♦ I . ■ 'ifStfeiili »• vf !•.*"•♦• '■; ; v-t;)'.'..-., v;f ■nv " ; i.j.- ,; , H': '.k^lii > •*»r. I ___ J •j-;‘'!*» f*' ‘ *, I ■> . ... ki‘ ^ •■ * f . .. ‘it • :// nv •*■ •' v*!" r * ’ '■ '• f* **;r. > .t;l^';; •■ "‘f :‘i' * '’ v''!li<^}:'‘ i " | fU W>( i •"'' ' I i ^ *•» ’ I ♦• ‘i-t-I . • .;Vr . •[ j { t:-’- ..’t *. ^.: ‘hi * ' f ■ ; vir' if* >V‘«' V t ;•' • iV .*• I* M-' ■. • >‘f^! n .;: •; • .'• ■■if ;: i'> ‘ .1* ........ I ■^' -*■ ^ si t" ’■ teii: .mm 11?^# .5' g W m ; vni - • > ••*• . . * iJ* ii:.' ». *;■'*. 1, j.i‘1 ita: M V f '•; !<•■/ I'Ah V* ■ ...M i.'ilV,'.]' if"i: <!!' i t f I ?.: t r.‘ •. l.JV'Srf >V •-- -S\ . N mm ‘/ v l*‘‘‘ • ;; i » «»««• / ✓ C *" \ \ G4;jF ✓ -1 r ilir •*' «.ll ,m «• ..P J—»X li %t * (<<JI »# *!■ ^-‘!. •^•'. ?' 'i:: ; .‘m-! . ■« .'^; V.! .. ...H I .'; » * I 1*,;. I . I J, *"V[> , p f i-.'K«i.:.i •••• r.!'! * • „ ' * I r. .•••! V : ■ '-ti. ‘fe-■:.■!>;■ sH-iVf' '>f- :•* r ‘ , ji j •»! •.V I . •pk p> L.\ ■.•j '■■ jivll '.'A m i m i .... >■. r'li'H 'H. '■■■‘"'vp %«*•••• # «. //■' Wi’jf.! ». ?.*.•, ■■p.i'S4 1. *'b i ii' ■. ^^-r- ■t'. •,« // I \ -I »• t i i*‘t.,i **' • ' i.v- t:- . . ■••5 !-i f ♦ ♦. j 2 iiiJf/'-v- ‘ i,.i, I.I m 5'rHp V'u "V ’ * *• ) i '1 ■ fell ^ ^ i* ^I--' !5ll iii.j ill /J .. i lo * \* ■• n ■ :l*. ‘ %• »>, ••■‘U .* >‘‘i .'>/f.ipikv;i. • . '- , •*»• *. Sf'-r/, I ^ n ' * r*^ ’ •'II ■; t’*# /• •,.**• :k.« i’jir*V*Ki I*•• f* « m , '4 » .-u''iJiU'J •VlUi 7. V < r *P • l*f> fell t 1 ‘ 'it • V ’ • « ''' li * " ' #• ;'V kl V 4-'..- • •• 1 ■ . . ••* 'V •. -i •• .<r"ni. • 4* • ’ ■■ft.:- .• % *1/ V' *’ ■ .t • %<■• '* , •• ^ I- ••,' • t •• I.-.';>■* ■ lf> . V ' :• V- .*•• ( • :/v:- TO:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator FROM: Stephen Weckman. On-Site Systems Manager DATE:October 4. 1994 SUBJECT: Application #1971 Brian Kipfct/Greg Sargent. Condiuonal Use Pem.it - Septic Review The aoDlicants propose to rebuild the existing garage with another garage of similar size including a bathroom and additional plumbing facilities for a '^o^^^pace. T^e existing sept l!m Ltct have a suitable capacity’ for the additional plumbing to be installed in this stnicture. ?;^TaiCs^rsv"l's for a four Wroom residence. »hile Uu: existing residence orSSXirciuns. additional water usage anticipated front .he proposed work space will likely not exceed the capabilities of the draintield. '•K.. Mstn CertiCicato of Survey for Brian Kipfor & Grog Sargent ot Lots I and 2. Block 1, CIllPPliWA Tlliun ADDITION licnncpin County, Minnesota mmm /■ ------------ CITY OF ORONO jf. SITE PLAN__GRADING PLAN 'e*, Al’i-HOVr.D fl At rtlOVED WITH REVISIONS 11 D!:.APWTpV£D ^/l«o,ous C .... Ul tnr— M (K Vi • ■ Chipp ewo Lane Vi Legal Description Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, CHIPPEWA Til I HI) APOITION. This survey shows the location of all existing buildings on the above descriucd property. It does not tmrport to .inow any otht-r 1 nproV in;ents or 'ncro£ichrnents . •: Iron marker found 0; Judicial Landmark found 'A > CoiiiN & Gronberg . Inc . 4 • ''ll, ri.i'iu. M -f I, I V I • iiII. I ,iLi \|\ ■>' t'<i1,1 V i li.'l • ■ i: rt i:r I hereby certify that lliis survey was prepared bv nie or under my direct super vision, and that 1 am a duly registereil Civil Knuina r and Land Surveyur undvr the laws of the State of Minnesol.i, Math S. CronberR Minnesota License Number 12755 DATE 9-15 -91 SCALE I”- ■^O' |OUN0.9f *357 I. irtvfril U C/I NGPIAN M NS ^6 CA(yK Ui L \ ' •* 7^ • |{MTE9-|5-9j TO:Chair Schrt>eder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Mixnse, Cit>’ Administrator w FROM:Jeani^ A. Mabusth. Buildine & 2^ning Administrator DATE:October 10, 1994 SUBJECT: #1972 Daniel J. Radford, 3593 Crvstal Place - Vari'^nces - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC Lake Shore Residential requiring 1/2 acre in area Existing lot area = 8,715 s.f. AppB'ation: Street setback variance required for proposed; I2'xl6.4’ three season fKxch Pertinent Ordinances A.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage. Total lot area = 8,715 s.f. Allowed = 1,307 s.f. or 15% Propt sed = 1,010 s.f. or 11.5S5 Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover 500-1, area, (refer to Exhibit E) 500-1,000 ’ = 4,875 s.f. Allowed = 1,706 s.f. or 35% Existing = 804 s.f. or 16.5% Proposed = 1,096 s.f. or 22.4% on s.f. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Street setback variance Required = 30 ’ Existing = A. 27 ’ includes 3 ’ stoop or landing area B. 25 ’ includes landing and stairs Proposed = 18 ’ Variance = 12’ or 40% List of E.xhibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Hardcover Fact Sheet E - Survey F - Floor Plan G - Elevation r Zoning I'ile #1972 October 10, 1994 Pace 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes installation of a 12’xl6’4" three season porch to the street or north side of existing rcMdencc The existing stoop and stair arc Uxated 25 ” from street lot line. The proposird three season porch would be 18*. The h^nise to the east is legated slightly behind tront line of existing residence and is 10’ iwm the shared lot line. The residence to the west is m line with the front line of the subject structure. Applicant s residence is 14* + from west lot line and the proposed addition will be 22’. The mature evergreen in the street yard will not be lost as a result of the construction. The residerere has been vacant for over nine years. The current owner and applicant is a retired contractor and has slowly worked on the renovation of the structure over the summer months. Staff met with the applicant on site and discussed the issue ot tuture olf street parking as residence is not served by a drivewav nor off street parking area. Note there is 610 s.f. of available hardcover and there is adequate width w ithin the west side yard to allow a minimum width driveway to rear yard. Applicant did discuss his plans for a future garage to the rear yard located out of'the hardcover zone (review Exhibit E) but note structural coverage tacts ateve, applicant is already at ll.S^t with proposed improvements with only an additional 297 s.f. allowed for additional sta'Ctural coverage. If a garage was to be in.stalled on this property, a structural coverage variance would be required. Review Exhibit G. note change in nx>f line at northwest comer of residence. The variance need not be addressed for this expansion a.> intensification of roof structure will occur within conforming street and side setbacks. Statement of Hardship Review E.xhibit A, applicant notes minimal living space and enhancement ot stmeture Issues for Consideration 1. Would proposed improvement be consistent with development within Lmmcdiate neighborhood? 2.Can three season porch be UKated so as to conform to setback standards, rcter to Exhibits E and F? 3.As it is the intention of applicant to install a future garage, should applicant be advised to amend current application to include future garage that would require a lot coverage variance J r Timing File #1972 October 10. 1994 Pace 3 Options of Action Approval as submiucO; or Approval as amended; or Tabic pioviding applicant additional time to submit a plan that uould include a future garage r CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S200.00 (S50.CX) per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming stnK:turcs $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) A- #19JT •s-r I 0 )) illf Cf j CFFICE • ♦ '• It ‘t It 1 VW W LhlCX .If f'C^ v} A4^X\' •. > r :: T'L**’ Kw ^ a f » • -*^4 1 ¥ "• »» V*w PROPERTY INFORMATION Vrif^n N^urnber (P.l^ w %r V a 'Vv a » hTopertv Identification Number (P.l.D.) / 7 f 7-----> «• ■» «—■ Attach legal description to application if not Lnclud^ on required surt’cy. Date Propertv' Acquired^______________—Ol T - __ _ ^ 1 ^ 1 .% ar% j-A) (don^) also (monthf>‘ear) Present use of property: ^residential Zoning District:___________________ other (specify) APPLICANT /./ lY^J-fcrd. 7^i-h . Cir Phone ihome> ~(»££f4 Phone (work) f — :J'nSjr:r/^Nt^ Z\yi\ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ ______ Phonethome) Phone (work)_ Address:Citv:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:__/ ^Arj2 c Estimated Construction Cost %j 7 P f^d^v'c.ln ^ r ng' _ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage ^ Setback:ront Side Rear Average Lakeshorc Other (specify) compliance wjth Zoning Code rpguirpments: r,»y% 7^ r<?L ft (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS # 1 0 7 P, ^!1 of the information must b€ submitted by the application dendlTne date tn order vn..r application to be cotiRdered cgmpjetei 1. ^ 2. ^3. 4. 5. Completed Application Fonn Certified Propert) Owners List of ow ners within 150 ’ (v ou must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 34S-3271). ^ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). “Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11" for reproduction. ... . Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes m cxistmg grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8*.^" x 11" for reproduction.arc proposcu. in auuuiuu, v*/ — 6 u< Sketches or plans of floor & elevation view-s (provide one (1) copy 8>/i" x U"). 7 rl~ Lust of tlic legal names (include marital status) of aU persons with an interest in the -nfi< u.r*iiid include name(s) of arplicant(s) if not current owner(s). List ot lliC 1C231 naincs vinciuuc uioiiuii **** .v.. property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 9. ___Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 8. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your vnriance appli^ iHon is not complete if the abciveJnfMmatjonJiaijmt been included, APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE , u u The applicant hereby aerees to provide all infonnatton required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pa\ additional fees (staff time not covered by ongmal tee TO™'") and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and cenifies tha information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. o- , , 'Applicant s Signature ,U-/yf >1. Date ^ ^ OW'WR’S SI(^\A.XURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authonzes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Conimissio.7 members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature fQ Date Applicara must have all subrairals into the City oflices 25 days MondaiTrf^Sh^onth" Meeting. Planmng Commission Meetmgs are held on the third Monday of each mo^ Applicaots must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the nvemems an*?CouncU. if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meetmg. P'^^e^e amigraenu to have an authorized%ent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zomng Office of this change prior to the meetmg. t*Ti «f/umMTCN 99%,-^t-m09 ABM 0M«* MMI ^ TA)»ATC«/If' >• V%# J.Mi otcK nm^ TAxrmii NiHE/ADQt• Vk-r->^ V ‘ • * ^‘ Jt #•• . Uf AOOi II HIM!TAXFmil/i•f^r . ' 4x > MM ABM QMCR NAM TAMAVCR NAME/AKMt ,i.i MM AOM T* |r OMBR NAM nr'TAXBAVW ^t;^HAM/A0M .4,. .4... * M 1T-117-2S » 0001 ooosa AOORfSS UNASSlCNiB NCLtoo CMrrr tee rail autrDAKOTA RAIL INC XS ADAM Sr NMurcMiNsoM m sssmSB ir-iir-xs SA MJ5 OXitS BLAINE AVE TINOTW e SWEMSfM TINOTNY 6 SNENSEN XEBS BLAINE AVf ORONO m 55S91 MEIMRIN CtRKTt MOKRTf INTtSMTION StSTIH MMCRTT OIMRS LIST3* ir-ll7-XS J* WiS 0XX5S BLAINE AVf M L BAKAEN INI BAUIS KAROLD L BAAAEN t9 XMB ST N C Bi:01 MLS m SSAISSB ir-iir-x3 5A OCX* tSAOO LIVINSSTON AVEB f SHAM JR I J N SHAM L SHAMISO MOOB BUCK LA ORONO NN SSS91Si 17-I17-XS AS OOSX BSS9S CRYSTAL RL r J MOSCMINX ETAL DANIEL J RAOrORB IXAA TOTH ST EINVER OROVE NEICNTS m SM77 Si 17-nr-xs as boss OSSM LIVINGSTON AVE H ANDCRSON/B BCGIN-ANOCRSON N ANOERSOM^ BEGIN-ANDEICaN SSiO LIVINGSTON AVf NAYZATA ««4 SSSTl Si 17-117-X5 AS OlAS •SSiS CRYSTAL RL EVELYN J LANGE EVELYN J LANGS SSiS CRYSTAL RL NAYZATA m SSSTl m ' * A A 1 ••■>: • r-'- A 4 * « 4 i ■ J f I -..a?' " 4. 1 • SB 17*U7-XS AS eojs 055TT crystal RL MfRSfL H roRfsrtR KRSCL EORESTER S5AA CRYSTAL RLACE HAY NAYZATA m SSSTl Si ir-iir-x5 as oiss OXITS SMAOYMOOO RO JOIM N ANDERSON JOHN N ANDERSON XITS SHAOYNOOO RO MAVZATA 7W SSSTl Si 17-117-XS AS 0150 0557X LIVINGSTON AVf TURK N I KAREN L CUEF nark N t KAREN L CUFF S57X LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA m SSSTl HRORTSB 17-117-25 SA BBlA 0C2A5 BLAISE AVf DONALD J FRETLAMO DONAiS J FRETLAM A*AR VIKING OR RSOi MLS M SSASSSB 17-iir-xi AS Bixi 03555 CRYSTAL RL BEAN TERNS DEAN TOUNB S55S CRYSTAL RLACE NAYZATA m SSSTlSB 17-117-2S AS BiiA OSSTA LIVINGSTON AVI MIRVCT B RCOER HARVEY 6 RSDER 3S*8 LIVINGSTON AVf MAYZATA HN SSSTl SB 17-117-ZS AS 01S8 035TO NMTNERN AVE LANRENCE HUOERLC JOSEPH MUOERLE S5T0 NORTMRN AVC NAYZATA m SSSTl NO. PlASSAOl J'* jf, 5 ' .''iv * &r5 -t .rl A’it.- r I' • • .V r*3=H:Ji;. , 'MMI it ‘.)<f\iwsA M M-H , V » io:ii TOTAL BATCM WN MTl 0VU/9«t* 'ti ^ ► * A:*• ■' :<%•^4».A; 19 % r * ^‘v ' '■ i-’** i}.mi-./:f I’, i 'i ’■ Ir' '■' % t ■4^ #« *• 7 NEStC^m COUHTt WOntTV INTOBIWTION SVSTtHRrt CMCCS LIST ■ 1». .• ^KCPOKT ms. fl41i«$l »i« 9 wm^“* - ’’'L ^ ‘ -f^*..• • •t« •» * •' ,♦ ‘IT'V ^ -u♦<>■i 4 * * *’■> 4 . •CD.,.1A ;t .■«>V,D; * ■ ■; X'«, ■' i»K.*;'r': ' '-h i tei'• ' D.■ J^.' - i.v * iS • *♦' ■^ jgs. > •; . •*»J * t CfRTirV THAT rm facts IICF«ISCNTI0 A«1 an AC^ATl TWit OF WF RNONLEKE AND SCLICF. m&MOATI 0, r i 9. \ * > J JJl 'i ■’■bi: ‘ V' -\ I' ii-M '-1 m' ' 1^ «b ^.. • i :ft-J § - ^ H- i C t/i :V -4 y ** ?*' ‘^' n?], i. Fi-., 1 > HI 1 r:>i'.' |‘wi1 M‘t _ V 1 • r rf '<sf</4,. • r-*//,. j' 1 i» I 1 i ik*^ > • tk 1 1 4 h 4 •A* /- » ‘4. y-t •li V' »• 44 ! M *-} «u r> » II O- , ' :j ^ «j < j »» A T> t ■ !• r» Jii w .-•s *4J cr ir> • /* I ♦ »»i t-1“^ cn r d> tj 1 r 1 u *• > /••<(. W !i 5 •J* *M K ___1- ‘ >4 5 •* . V « ^ - , j* ^ ^ Xvi •M • ■c 13V b J^ ' >♦ ^ t tv *. r-j *; •r o'“ ^ ' i* i ,...V ' __“-Jil Jv JK3 >5 f’’'* ^.__* J i«. 1 « >? a- o^.> H _:^i54.3 t V ' >3ll ' ^3 b 1 W b "— a a k y: - h: , . 4-.^, il4. i ■a ' ^ ” J*-”^ _ |V.._5__ « 1. . _ '.1fc-_ -- ------------ !^ '• 19^>4! ■ -'-' iVb .......•* \ j* i/» - *.*'31.3- ;4 ri IV b IV J « *; * :•'■ -IV. 5. kj V4 b >? 5;'" y___}. ... -J. kT V _ • »'»t >'_i. :r_* V. b -5 S • -a'* ^ ^ l V b 1V b ^-■’ a 5 - ^ •V b 1V b -r 1\> . V '• »» \ X v' .....► Jl **1 bo r? K» Ak *c ^ i it^i 14 SJ- i^. «•* m ^ m 0^ 3 « _ VI 5 Vi »••'H *^'w ^,,ir•vt k» V? ^t4fi rr i4v yi / 144 \ \ --?rr' __iwk ----------^-- 1* U.,95 ' ‘i.!jJi rf* •k «w S M ___ y _U2.il «^■l .5^09 O f-UAVAKIU K. I*-? ^ -P*j e j <n 134 b 134 b IV •• \'j4 b A .j, a. - C4 •*.I 54 • •V« •: ^ % V •> j*■S Ik < £ ^IV b n» _ y ^,3? 5 k; IV b a o< ” - ^ *-><*m : IV b 0» y y: . M ^ :* 14b vJl _/ t* ) V s -I jr ^0^.5 ■? '■•»k » —4 J* 'O IV b f^-5 fj» a :J- a 14 b b ^ "• a c* Ci ; a Vk-^ • 1a'»* V." K _'J<.A a ,T, - M '>*.5 a 57* 0 >^( 5 IV b a X ” v: IV 5----------- a * Z<» F ------------ a a-i2 IV 5 a T«* a -- IV b w *IV i VP o» a ^ i^ijv .b «k5 j» 4 knz ._- alib M AVI :i8 137 ^ ^ IV 133 OJ >^.3 a ^ >4 ^ t - IV SI a ly VJi — t* ^ - IV 4 . ->2 =iV ^ 2i3I 5'^ VC to 0* •5^ ^_ -fs^iv 5 ^ vra ^^ iieL 7^ !k. r hardcovtr calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-/5 75-250'25-5W fYTSTING H \RDC0VTRJN.£Q^ A. House ----— jf-U- I % X X . . ...* B. *~“ C ^ ^ • V i J X - uarage 1 - • T • • J t - D.SiuewiiS____— X • j:) T»X 1 F X f ' F.X - X m Underlain „ ^ . Du Df'Kfic X m 4H»- ■a.Other X - TOTAL H.ARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ____ * ® ■ X IGO fftoPOSEP HAPnro\TR IN ZONK A. House ^ O-------- Ungth ^WUlth X X % l22 B. Cange C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROKWY AREA IN ZONE ^ , ,o0 13 ^ S-F. _________S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S F S.F. S F S.F. S F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. t Cf^ S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Si2.S.F. S.F. D S.F. S.F. A B ->»* . V. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F IO0Y S.F. A S.F. B ^ % r Sketch «'f rrojirt-.o*! Anviitiosi »of Dan Rt^dford . |>4#> flOlh Street Invex Qro^ nriyhta, liS 5S077 DELMAR H. SCHWANZ i«7M SOUTH RORERT TRAIL «N «***•*■•• ROSE MOUNT. Mil tSOTA ssosa •12/«n>17» A SURVEVOirS Cf RTiriCATI P2JiC^ l\ o 5: o • / h. Vj A M !-r-J nrali?: 1 Inch • 30 foet » IDescription: Ix>t 11, niock 3, NAV/VRRF. IIRIGilTS. • • I h#r«by otrtify that this iufvay. plan, or rapofl was praparad by ma or undar niy diract tuparvition and that I am a duty Haptatarad Land Survayor undar tha lawa of tha Slaia of lilrmaaota. 09-09-94 Oalffiar H. Scfiwani Mlnnwots RsgmriWow Mo. M2$ r V3 d A m adyiiic'n 1.0 l(' i roic i u v ofI- MIMiM ( 'I j jtri f it <‘l <1^C\'if::Jxii Hlcicc ‘Navai'rt' • *. 1 .uL.—L 11__rt iV,':-j,J T T* rVT iL J__LM Hi. .-ia*; • ■ “ .;•■rr *7-^R ■ ’ ‘l 5[f y ; 1 [’ ,-A-< -i irr4j.-^p. -.V ’ i* ! .j a...' ., ’ }K--* rli__I i I ■ : . L . _ '-,-1. - 1 'Roof X I »->r:zz=:^^— 1 -,-r; :o5i3c: r *i‘ -L-t-' ■ ~^-r T :rra:T __I--* — 1 I —r-rr-:- •' :i£E R O R oca’Ie E L I -: V A TIO N 1/4." = r - o" ==i=tcr. r>». iW r TO: DATE: Chair Schroeder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Mtwse. City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator October 11, 1994 SL1B.IECT: #1973 Thomas W. Cashman. 15W Long Lake Bhtl. - Variances Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1 A. Lakeshorc rcsidcniial requiring 2 acres in area. The property consists of 16.701 s.f. Application* Applicant seeks lakeshore setback, bluff, side and street setback variances for proposed detached garage within the street yard and a deck at the lakeside of the existing residence. The following ordinances arc pertinent for this review; Section 10.03. Subd. 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage. Total area = 16.701 s.t. Allowed = 2.505 s.f. or 157c Existing = 1.305 s.f. or 7.8% Proposed = 1,963.9 s.f. or 11.8%’" ♦Addition of 910 s.f. of new structure and the removal of 251.7 s.f. ot existing structure Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D) - Required street setback for garage with doors lacing away from street. Required = 10' Proposed = 5’ Variance = 5’ or 50%. Section 10.22, Subd. I (B) - Review of average lakeshore setback. Review E.xhibit D, the lakeshore deck does not encroach the average lakeshore .setback line. Section 10.22. Subd. 1 (A) - Lakeshore setback variance. Required = 75’ Existing = 72’ Proposed =61’ Variance = 14’ Section 10.22. Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75’ setback area = 9.083 s.f. Existing = 258 s.f. or 3% c f ProposeJ = 916 s f. (removal of 92 s.f. of walkway and concrere palio + 234 s.l. ot lakeside deck + 4’ wooden siaircasc al 516 s.t.) Zoning File #1^73 October 11, 1994 Page 2 Hardcover increase = 658 s.f. 75-250' setback area » 7.618 s.f. Allowed * 1.904.5 s.f. or 25% Existing = 1,570 s.f. i>r 21% Proposed “ 2,575.8 s.f. or 33.8% Hardcover increase = 1.005.8 s.f. (576 s.f. garage + 681.5' drive 251.7 s.f.) Hardcover variance *= 671.3 s.f. or 8 8% existing garage at Section 10.56, Subd. 16 C (2) - Bluff setback variance Required = 30’ A. Proposed garage =15' Variance = 15 ’ or 50% D. Deck extends 10 ’ into bluff. Description of Request Applicant proposes the removal of the existing garage in the street yard that encroaches the street The stnicmrc meets the required side yard setback of 10' but encroaches the bluff impact /one (30’ setback from top of bluff) at the west side by 15 . The applicant proposes the installation of a lakeside deck as structure is currently not served with a deck but mcrelv an eanh-type patio outdoor sitting area at the southeast comer of existing structure 31 ’ wide deck will extend within bluff and the bluff impact zone. Major portions are located w ithin the 75' setback area. Applicant proposes the removal of some 9. s.f. of exiting improvements within the 0-75’ setback area to offset 234 s.f. of new^ hardcover ^ajor increase in the U-75' setback area results from the addition of the 4 wide woixlen stair structure resultine in 5 It- s.f. of additional hardcover. Ihe staircase as long as it meets the required minimum width of 4’ is allowed in lakeshore lots with steep banks. Upon your inspection you will observe the owner’s need to provide a safe access to the lakeshore. Review Exhibits E, I* and G r Zoning File #1973 October 11. 1994 Page 3 report on her comments She uiHiU have no problem with the garage as pr^>p.>scd and wvxiIJ appro\^ the setback of 15* ± Staff and Strauss concur that we winild not want to sec an> encroachment of the 75* setback area ni>r the bluff and rrci'mmend that if a deck is to be installed at the lakeside of hcHise that it be placed at the stsutheast comer behind the /5 setback and the 970 elevation. of bluff, requiring approval of a skIc setback \anancc. ITie LR-IA Zoning District requires a 30* side setback The deck will also be able to provide a stable structure for connection to the lakeshore access stair. Note also the location of a mature tree that would be lost if deck ha? to extend along front of residence. Upon your inspection of the property mne that at the souihcaM c*'rncr there appears to be an existing three season porch that could be renovated w ith a new deck contKcted at the southeast coriKr of the resideiK'e. Staff asked Strauss to confinii what DNR prefers in the way of erosion control when wi^rk is conducted within the bluff impact rone. She preters silt fencing rather than staked hay bales as staked hay bales are mvt durable when coastruction extends beyond two weeks Al.so review area or elevatii'n? at the kvation of the new garage. Staff will a^k ft>r detailed grading arai drainage plans for the City tngineer's review. Should these plans be submitted w iih the building permit application or prior to Council s formal action; Review Exhibits J and K, Weekman notes that the propi>sed improvements will not hinder the liH:aiing of future septic site on this property as there really is no other viable area for septic needs. ^The only option for applicant will be either a holding tank or a limited septic area to the northeast of the house if the well is relvKated on the site. As Weekman also iH>ies. this neighborhood is an area currenily being reviewed by the City for potential sewering in the future. Statenien! of Hardship Review Exhibit A, staff would add extreme steeped topographies. A third acre lot being .subjected to 2 acre zoning standards. The house is currently not served by a deck and there are signs of erosion at the top of the bank at the southeast comer where a make-shift patio area is in use. The cxi-sting single stall garage is in a serious state of disrepair and not able to be used for parking purptises. Issues for Consideration 1.Would you approve a lakeside deck that was located out of the 75* setback area and out of the Muff.’ What kind of setback variance would you grant at the east side lot line and bow much hardcover increase would you allow w ithin the 75-250 setback area currently proposed at 33.8 /t? Zoning Fite #1973 CXlobcr n, 1994 P3gc 4 Arc there other harUcover impro\*CTnents that coukJ be remaned witiKmi creating nH>re ermic>n pri>Nems? - 96 s.f. of paiw block area. 135 5.f. of walks? If walks are rcmovctl, how do you descend to this pix^ny * 3 4 Should proposed garage improvement be reduced in area? Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Options of Action Any reconimcrKlation v)f approval must include the following conditions. I Applicant to provide detailed grading and drainage plans with building permit application for garage for City Engineer’s review and approval. Permit will not be issued until plans are approved. (Should plans bt submitted prior to Couraril’s formal approval or at time of filing of building pennit?) 4M« Applicant’s cradinc and drainage plans should include erosit>n coiUfol on site where ground areas' are to' be disturbed. DNR recommends silt fencing rather than staked hay bales. Staff also recommereis tku at the southeast corner of the residence where there are signs of erosion that applicant restore groundcover to funher reduce potential erosion. Approval as proposed; or Approval as amended. If application is amended, a new site plan kKating lakc.side deck must be submitted prior to scheduling application before Council. Planning Commission to provide clear directives to applicant. r IL CITY OF OKONO - V ARIANCE APPLU^OJifl Initial Application Fee S200.00 If ^ ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original applicatwo) VariaKC for noo*confonning structures 5.00.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) r<*^' ff ^-. fi t . rJ, , ’ • tf-J ^ (j •■ i* • - *i -‘VK.J ' i' -•' c fi rr’’ r wvvA Propert) Idcntificaijoo Number (FID)—',r -/ c<_' ^ ^ ^ Sc ^.u.ed Date Prcr«tv' Acquired-----7~/ ' 7 *±-——------------------------ I (do) (donS) also own the adjacent parcels ot land. P^mWofpropeny: ^residcruil -----other (speefy)------------- Zoning District:__ (month/year) r -r p^icine ihome) </Y'C' y V6 *y. Phooe(wt)rk)_____"•? ^applicant /i j' . t M-hTTW* *'*'’• ---------------------— -----------------—— 0^''NTR (if different than applicant) Name ____________—------- Phomhome) Phone (work)_ Address:Cit%^:Zip: description of rf :qlest • fl . * 1 Estimated Construction Cost S / ^c^OC'^. —------------------— - .1 I til-- - f jfy f7l^ ^(attach additional sheets if necessary) Lot NWth Hardcover _Lot Coverage Side __y Setback: Front Rear Average l^akeshore Other (specify) ^ "I* " -______ —------- li • ------------ ^ HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION of CNLSUAL preventing Devenbe undue hardship or pract.cal ditficulty pc unt^utU p.ope.^ c^m P :ompliance with Zoning Code requirements: Ouj^.a^ •— .n4j,.U. l.u,:.. -h:JL. .... t P r;.r.r-J; 'f ,rr 'Y ^■, '1 ■ yJr~^ ■iWVt; y r ft % \ \ h \ 4 required submittals AH «f the information imr^ ^^mitted hvJh<LaggUcgtfMdf3d!]n^^ for vmir aPD ltcatimi to b<XQnsid£g±gaBBktei 4: 4.: £s?- tun cv (existing and proposed elevat.onsl if my changes S«>'' ^ me'^f^sed. In add,non. prov.de one (U copy 81V x U or^P^ucnon. ,1^ . > L. <;ir»rhes or rlai» of floor & elevation vic -as (provide one U) copy 8 x 1 1 )• ^ - V^ Tibc l^al names (.nclude mariul sums) of all persons ssith an .merest .n the . TaH^lde^un, to du, appl.cat.on, please anach a separate l.s. o, any other persons vou wish notified of this application. X Additional items as may be requested by Cit>^ staff. 5. 6. 7. S. S^iaS^ii^SS^p"^ /APPLICANT’S SIGNATLRE remiired or requested bv the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees to prosi e a ^ covered bv original fee payment) Administrator, agrees to pay ’ .f^'V ^Ws P^ and certif.es that theand/or consulun. eapemes .ncurred m res .e v ot tms app information supplied .s true and correct to the^st ot tus/her knosUedge. OWNER’S SIGNATLiRE ..nniintinn and further authorizes reasonabler=Er.s“; members for purposes of inves.igat.on md ver.nca..on ot thrs request. ^ . X / / / / Owner’s Signature ■> Date Q - Applicant must have all submittals into the Ctty offices 25 days twfore then ^g month. Nfeeting. Planning Commiss.on .Meetrngs are he d Commission Applicants must be present at all ,,j meeting please make arrangements and Council. If an applicant is unable to anend a ™ & zoning Office of to have an authoriaed agent attend in your place and to advise the Bu.i = this change prior to the meeting. ■« UTt tvnmUTta 110 H C9UHTTraop A9MMca mmTM9ATIR M Xft-XU-lS 5S oon •1490 UMB lARC »LV«T • ANKR9CM t C A XNOtRSON T«0V « CATMCRtNK tmt 14M LONS Uilf e*.V«UN6 LAM N< SSSM^ 0 TA>»ArfRNAfC/AOOR St Zt-llt-ZS ss OiSSt L0N6 LAM M.VQ ORANT D I66CNKR6 CRANT B iSCCNMRQ USB LONB LAM BLVP LONB LAM MN S5S54. •1 BROP AOOR CBMKR NAHI TAXBAYIR . .NAME/ABBR SB SS>llB-2S t£ tool 014BI L0H6 LAKI BLVO KURTZS A CRCCNLtY A MZH KURTZS A CMCHLtY 14BS LONB LAAK BLVS LONB LAM m SSSSB■ rM , 4* ^ ' * < ■ i *4 « . i BfOB AOBR V , OMNIR NAME ,-t.'iTA»AYtR ■^1 MMI/AOOR j M -ln^r^U■ ^‘V|: SB SS-IU-ZS ZZ 000% 0150S LONB LAKE BLVO JAMES B METRE JAMES B MIVHI Z50B LONB LAM BLVO LONB LAKE M4 S5S5B r n:}. V-' ■. V/ S.- *> Pi Y1 fTvf L •••’( -•#4 0 ■■ -'f'^-rrr. hit .# i s: > »5- » j . ■ "i - »«■ ; '.1 ' Y • • . f- 1 ; t.. . 11 ■ - .nJ RTV iMroamnSi STillMi LZ5T ■fCOBT MO. AtASSABlPAa zsSB ZR-llB-ZS M •ISlA LONB LAKE BLV« CZNOT J rTCORICASOHciMOv rRLoaxascHISIA LONB LAKE BLW LONB LAM m SSZ54 a ZB-IU-ZS S3 «0»• ISZO LONB LABE BLVOB J SHZTM A R S JONBALL• J smTM A R S JWBALL ISZB LONB LAKE M.VB LONB LAKE m SSSMSB Z4-ilB-ZS S3 0014 0U3S LONB lake M.VB BERNZCE ZUr«USCM ttmXCE ZIMUSCM ZSS9 LONB LAKE BLVO LONB LAM m SS35*SB :i*u«-z5 S3 mt7 B1«BQ LONB LAKE BLVO iNSTA I KEITM VANPER BRAMBEN R A VANBEN BRANOEN 1489 LONB LAKE BLVO LONB LAKE m SBSSB58 U>11B-ZS ZZ BBOZ eiSZS LONB LARI BLVO L H CARROt ETAL IVL 1ST L M CAAROM A M STUBBS 17505 OLB ROCKFORB R» ALVIO/TM W 554*4 SB 35-llB-ZS ZZ 0001 0X104 LONB lake BLVO TMONAS M CASMRIN THiIVLS M CASMNAN 1104 LOW LAKE BLVO LONS LAM m SS3S4 TOTAL BATCM 019 00919 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RimSEHTtO AM « «CURATE AND TRUE REARESENTATIOM OF INFORMATION AS IT ARMARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE MENNERIM COUNTY OERARTMEMT Of WWRERTt TAXATION# TO TM BEST MY RNCM.EOGE AfO BELIEF. OATI S,u ■' *4 in ' ^'4 %m., »* iif . ■ ns ji-R B * ♦ r t. 3^ 116-25 GOVT LOT • '.'•• ■*'.-v'‘ i •T* « ^ u?*/ ♦. ^ (2iU O'f -M * 1 ^ - p ... •i • • - . -• Ai V|V A-^&"Tpr «» •» f*'-’"yjY -Zor" r»*^ ft' •!>♦« s*-*^, •*vM*<nrT»rr* *v*4»^ tl -*.▼■Ti>t I " o*»-’'TOC j," , A/r«M»>fj,r,iu ,(9tt^'5. ie»i i^*'^ "r"'•■.r» __.V • -TB,* / ^ mm__ < __** *‘*?^' ^'^r t* -^••*^'*•-»~(. -»«H»2^ J»^^e i_r» »r^.~/*v r r TO:Jeanne A. Mabusih. BuiWing Zoning AJministratcr f'ROM: Stephen Weekman. On-Silc Sy stems Manager DATK September 22, SI BJKCT: #1973. Toni Cashman • Septic Revaw The purpose of this tetter is to review the impact of the addition of a tw*o car garage and removal of a single car garage on this property. The applicant s current septic system is a marginally functiomng non-confomiina septic system. TIk most recent inspection indicated evidence of past surto discharge but is not currently airfacing. With the current well kKation. the applicant’s only of>iH>n for upgrading the existmg septic system is to install a holding tank on the street side of the residence near the existing garage. The proposed garage location docs not preclude a future hoU.ng unk If the well were relocated to provide more area tor a new drainfickl. the one logical area on the lot appears lo have been excavated, has a high seaMinal water table and a lunTied area. Tterefore, the only feasible soil treatment system w.Hild be an alicrnative, undersized system which could only treat a portion of ite anticipated w a Me load. This property falls wiihm an area where a sewer project is bemg discussed by the City Council. The applicant’s proposal for replacing existing garage in another IcKation on the property docs not further restrict the future siting of a septic system as this lot has no viable treatment sites on the property. ?! UP j r^s^crioN mccmo co^o iOCATlONSiilCTCM IOATfcoMniAscfOATfOAlLCmIlhSiEL ^ 1^0^ CJAJC, AJr^rn> Z.f'^AFACl^^C, A'f*^ LASC *4'f±nt ^Ky^^iL JCH ^iA^/kx^ jnaiai- .—2-!^ fir:S^—I—&V / ^i «i»r i imdi i, , ,rr. —j ^^irsltr\ %.- CONfORMINO -4 - $UtST*NOARO JfL- NONCWfORlilNG ^ \ SL % ^S>oel. /^^crr J^c^err s Y i I • \ . f I • \ • *• *■•.•• r^m •# •, ; <♦ *. •*' >; • ■ *., ■ I' • t ♦ I% •V.• r \V• • « . • • • ^ ■f V •» • < •y . I . ■ • • V. •; •(.:i . t» * •! « •■ . V 1X1r . - t «t A. ^^^l# • X> I r size Siding 6* ar Herdboerd Cut inoecseei 4*16 btywoed Double r Vb9y1 8'i8 *419*•429**429**539* 8' M 12*‘549*•549* •559* •659* 8* 1 16’‘679*•689*•689*•809* i 12* 112'm lari amtm. Salt MetS919* [j matrntaf Ab Lmm^ D^S'Q'Ted for !^e "D g’ th rgs ij Store boats ca^^pers gander' ,!j tractors a'^id more i52 6r.'« 6Z22 i!’ 6235 6264 628C 63*6 6329 6345 ' '#’35 i’5’ MUiflaii AeUilii This buifdtr^ teatorei a large rr ■ f r door operwio and an •ntide heigin of 109* Just right tor Storing Otcyciea and yard •du'pment i92St7i 5ii7 56«? %a06 57W 572a 5?57 5271, 6361 6317 6620 6646 6656 6^4J. 6766 6772 9012 9Q» 9041 Six* Siding | 4 It Herdboard 4 i8 Innoraaal 4 ir Plywood Doubia r Vinyl 8'I 8’•479* 1 *479*•479**629* 8' 1 12*•619**629*•629*•789* 8’ 1 16’•759**759*•759*•959* 10’ * 10*•629**629*•629*•789* 10’K 12’•689**689*•689**849* 10’ X 16*•829**829**829* Siding Size 4 1 8 Herdboard 4 It tnnoraeei 4 1 8 Plywood Double 5" Vinyl 12* X 12**919**919**919*•1^591 12’ X 16’*1,109**1,109**1,109**1,489* 12x20'*1,299**1,299**1,299**1,709* •Tr'e pf<es or these sr^eds garages arxJ post irarne bu id'ngs are aoprotimate pr^:*8 The actual pr ees may vary sightly r>»gner 0' ewef due to d '-cb changes after publication date Stop »n at M and 'eview the specifications Vou r^^ay buy ail the rater ais or ant pad at 'oe cash A carry prn:es Some rrateria s ava^iab^ spec ai order Because of the leide variabie >n codes. f?t! 47yrf ii»^M cannot guarantee t*"e rnjtena's I sted e»!ll meet your coofe reou 'i^'^er^ts These are suggested designs and mgtarial lists oely oo r-ot g^a'a'^’ee completeness or prices Labor concrete • ca -’t eectr cai r*»atmg pijrriong arxl delivery not •rnriuded 26 Building Mefeneit Not Avoiiebio In Richfiotd Is a terrlbie thing le mtnd r wX * . '\mN. VI Do-It-Yourself Step-By-Step Gara o Construction vr ^ ''’V ‘ ^ t' ‘H f '» 10 Easy Steps to Do-It-Yourself Garage Construction IW r Step 1 Cooiwit bw*»*«c i0^r * i«t coxiftr *n sputtKatM? tt Step 2 Ijf mH pcMdKiei •< 9a«<9« u%«Mg stiHic *i«*f »»»9lM«*f«9«a'9l<SCP**^e i| ci»«cie»f ••*»"% citfck •©< >c*fl antf sqtiairnrss Tvicf ifmloionf mcth (cmloicp'txnl as m» f bt ie9v«c9 stnkc and itoat fuusttctActetesiab Watt ancNn bo4n mte sti9 wdh 3' o< iNead ptt»|frt*n9 If em slab Date .n 1-3/4" li»«* tdq« ol slab I liam each cotntf and *JH epeniiiQ then app»o*t»natciy c»e*y * on ccniet |St« Itgwif i) Step 3 f tame waltj iJec trugtej 2.3 & Noic the Iff Jt siwd space tn each detatl 10 allow 4 sheallwng lotnts lo tail on siodi Seiwicedoof and window place- . ment should be dclcMnined p«»of lo sta/Ung to build. (See ligoie 5| V l] ,|l . • » ^ . ' 9 OUNO aTiOFI II |4 I A YOU I Swo **••« a • 0 *• *••• f»a p ^ ♦ »w •«I I >»• ••• *••• «w #• WM ••«•«•••% tot t • • d>* «.* ••««• • ••• »•• 1 1«< M Id • t imw r«»»*«oi l|FS • too e • a-aid*** J S?^.' M * » • t 9 •r*d t t • I e»«w* •■•oo ' d r i »*|»d e If «(• • I TtriCtl l»tJf !•••»# too ♦»••• • orf to d»o* o**>'«o d* o«o*o d^« «o«o •»« r.f t '•••<•« I • a • mw d«M i___ »d» I» • f#o •*••• Iff, y y |[py • • M* o « t»ift .vt ' • • * • V »• t • • • I • OffO'dOO 0 ’ •• • • K to... 0 ... C^7 .21 id t. J>;>] td Ht • I I I i«* •* •# OH t .«* r*»^%on-^ • f d*~# •• • r f'fW.O 1 CNO WAU r^AMINQ (At AM) -J I fo»**w.«o e.«. t•# t‘-« • • ■»• to Co-*.. *w ►n, •.. 0 # • t.*o*d loo ^w»# • %f%' fa OOo. 9...U0 o« Mow Old. dod loo e*o 0 rjl 9 0 a fWoidda. ft«d • 0 « *•• .d* ftWffO Mo»o too d^.wo td tor a**od #wd #»«• •*»di f.ooooi • • 0 ton. t«ow ^ dQ.Wy ■ t »*»* to*. . J _______toOQifft noon >npi»t f fif.#»o a tMO WAtl fMAMINC (FMONTI t d Of »•* o^ d-^-t• t • e »*.*• I II* •/« t M d ft fWd on t—t—1 —t-T-^1 —t—t—t • o «• Off. I. • . I »«ok m • • • I M.f •.-. I • I f «>W.OWo« 0*«oo 0.0* • • * o«««* ^ • • »*• t 0 I t< la* %» d««*« I—t •» J A O do* , •** * %•**• o' • .. 00-, rl^l—j l_Jj __ Iff. d»» t 1.1 I tMO. ® • a 0 1 ao w. ft* t > . I n*o* 0.^ !• • • ri l*(f «o.f 1.0 twa^o*. Onffd. lac* »o«. lA-O I t#^*l f If tw 0 0 TTncAi DOOn i WINDOW rnAMiNC 1-4 dat t»a dl»i« • f — aa-o a»*'Ho •*•. •*• • Oiod l.atwon Iwfonw. fif «0*0 I TVMfC^l CQAMtM asITMBI^ - r Step 4 RAFTEnS; . riirrk rn • vII,., CIKCKni.y cf vriii V V -V- »••#* »«f> f fw»rnmf 1 ^ 7 ^*FT£0 tNp CUT OETAtl. Hf C*r*i |S»# fi^ • Cwt £ » ^ G«bi« 5»4rift Al a */e f^UkW \X 79' ^f*d Widff Utf I 2 ■ I 7 ■ « nariff Tift Al « ®'t Itch (G#f»ot« U'^dfr 29 f 7 i § A«ti»r Ti»t ntq 4 On C«r«|f • 29 Af%d Widff FIgurf I ^ noor ttaming detail TRUSSES: .......... *' ........... .see 1.5.,. S, „,„ „ , • % step 5 Mjkmf cetiam tmsscs w raiicfs an p4tff»k and apfdy iMf khtailwnf Oc »v<c It sia99ct end i««Ms at kaki l«t ralici t« i«uss kpaecs Foiitn edge . and end |t«tu spaemf lectmmendauenk at stamped ta sheaiteMf (see b^tne I) Step 6 tnstaii garage doot wtndtw and sermcc door acemd- >ng to manviactuter'adwections Apply toH>t and lacia (see ItgwfC 11). Step 7 Apply oaiage doo« taml/, slop and btici mould. (See liguie IQji. Step 8 Apply fool (ell. gale, d • edge and shingles according to manulaciurcf s directions Apply sqIIii and lacia (see figure It). Step 9 Apply jiditrg accoidmg to inanulaclurct's directions Pami o< Slam siding, sollil. lacia and doois Step 10 Itl I t « I QU. !•# |]|ll Jl-It 11HtA#ei * •rlUii l« iy| §••« 1 ■ t I a < Sr«f HEAD DLTAIL t ■ € fiwtf 1 • 4 ff* < ■ « • ff tti. — If JAMD DETAIL f fat Jaw^li flick M»wU SMttfi^t k 1SI rtiii 7/ii • 4 ■ • If aiti^aaef SAcaiftiof C»tf D Ifff I • i facia »—) t/4 AC Saftn 2 i 2 NaHff k D^. 2 I 4 Taf r!a!f 7/1f I 12- lap Sidtof 1 2* Inautattif iiAtnf 2 I 4 f»t cwi $Twf A! li*o/cEach 7»fitff 2 1 4 Him. fUla Anther foMl At 4 e/C Each r'lguf* 11 TYPICAL WALL SECTION Sil back and rclaa knowing your vehicles and belongings aic securely protcclcdby your new MCNARU garage and you didilyourscll! . ka.. IMk ^ftvaon C anfftnirtann ait « ft »>t*^ f««» gtnt >• *> *r *>• —>t t ntt fcn»* A-ne*tA^tra e# ttu e*>«* «w*» »■*»#■ t Mt •«••«*« fWaf t* •#<»*•»>« »««4 If •( I f*« tmi t» • ri tam m* •m*' I W* m-4^ »♦ i •««« • *«,t • ' f f f fTB tvaty Ai !■ ma mm*0 m <*>■ mm* mmm* mmf imm iftu ant »mm fmm mm tm m»t W *m*m*mm ifm-mm ,mm4 m mrnm mmm »«f amm m • M A n Mi ta a-f ai ta r ^/3 To:Chair Schroedcr and Oi\>m> Planning Ci'mmisNion Membcni Mayw Callahan and Ori>ix> CinincjImcmhcrN Ron M»x'p«. Citv Administrator FnMn:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Ihiildmg Zoning Administrator Dale:October 12. 19*^ Subject:# 1974 Tyicr Corbin, 46S0 North ShsHC Dri\T - Coodiiional Ua Permit/Varianec - Publk Hearing Zoning Distrid: LR-IB Requiring 1 Acre in Area AppUcatlofi:Applicant seeks af^roval of a conditional use [«rmit and lakeshore hardcos^r variance for the reconstruction of retaimng walls within lakeshore yard. The following ordinances are pcrtiiKiii for this review. 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 - Conditional use permit required for either construction or reconstruction of retaining wall. Section 10 22. Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance required for installation of three-tiered retaining wall portions of w hich are located within lakeshore setback area 0-75* setback area * 7,250 s.f. Existing » 1,010 s.f. or 13.9% (Applicant has not included existing access stairs that has deteriorated and been removed.) Proposed = 2.090 s.f. or 28.8% Hardcover increase « 1,080 s.f. or 14.8* (620 s.f. or 8.5% of the increase results from installation of legal access stairs on lakeshore lot with steep banks.) 75-250* setback area =» 21.300 Existing hardcover = 13,6%.7 s.f. or 64.3% Proposed = 13.856.7 s.f. or 65.05% (resulting from addition ot portion of third retaining wall) last of Exhibits A - Application 0 c • Addendum • Plat Map D - Property Owners’ List E - Gustafson Utter 10/11/94 - Gustafson Letter 10/06.'94 - Hardcover Inventory. 0 75’ zone E G II - Hardcover Inventory, 75-250 ’ zone I J Original Plan Amended Plan-Hardcover Site Plan / ZtHiing File #1974 CXtober 12. 1994 Page 2 Description of Request Applicant seeks approval of alter-the-lact conditional use permit and variance approval for restoration of retaining walls within lakeshore yard, major portions of which are kx:atcd w ithin the 0-75 ’ setback area. The former retaining walls and access stairs were constructed of wood that has rotted aixl deteriorated and required replacement. On your site inspection you will note that erosion has been taking place during the periixl of time that the walls were in disrepair. Applicant has provided silt fencing at the base of the bank to prevent further erosion into ilw lake. Applicant did nc« realize that permits were necessary to replace existing walls and proceeded to install boulder walls in place of timber retaining wall. Review E.xhibit 1. the original plan. The low^r level wall that has already been installed is approximately 3* in height. Upon our site inspection, the Engineer noted that the second wall wxnild be over 4 ’ and the wall along tlw east side would be at approximately 7’. Review E.xhibit F, Gustafson ’s first review of the project. lie advised that if the walls were to exceed 4 ’ in height that engineering plans would have to be provided addressing all concerns noted in his report. He also lecommcnded that any wall that was to exceed 4 ’ in height not only required additional engineering information but should be constructed of modular masonry block rather than boulders. The applicant was given the opportunity to amend his plan, applicant opted to reduce height of proposed walls to 4 ’ bv installing a third wall. There was to be at least a 4 ’ separation between each tier. Review Exhibits J and E. Gustafson has approved the .unended plan show ing three tiered walls not to exceed 4 ’ in lieight. This can be completed with the boulders as originally proposed, l^ke access stairs have also been designated on the amended plan and appear to meet the 4 ’ width standards required. Any coralition of approval must include the requirement that erosion control be maintained on property until all disturbed areas are restored with suitable groundcover. Although not discussed, it would be consistent w ith previous approvals ot retaining walls within lakeshore yards that applicant provide landscaping at each tier to minimize visual impact ol wall unless Planning Commission members feel boulder walls arc natural and acceptable within the lakeshore yard. Staff would strongly recommend that landscaping be provided to minitni/e visual impact of three-tiered boulder walls and if approved, applicant should pn>vide a landscape plan prior to application being scheduled before the Council. Options of Action Approval of amended plan per Gustafson’s recommendation; OR Approval as amended by the Planning Commission. J HI I • t *r A i /! crr\* OF ORONO . GENERAL I..AND ISt APPL«?)aTIOS G .'I llv PROPERT\' LOCATION . « Site Address //-— Type of Application to be Filed _Tvpc of Application to oc rucu _ ------------------------------------- P'OPe’T.’ Identification Number (P.I.D.) 3^00^^ 33 o^-li:V^3 3^ oo S3 applicant Name I ^ ^ ^ ^ wC>fL B>X NJ AddrciTj^lOZSM^A) l>p-^ Cit> rv\0ujJD Phone tboroe) _ Wwoc (work) - O^Wh Zip O^^'NTR (if different than applicant) Name ________ Phone (home) I%onc (work) Address Cit>’Zip. DatePropeny Acquired ? | ((p ^ --------- I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application “ $125.00 Residential Accessory Use $200.(X) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duple.x CrediPBldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ^ Grading, seawall, retaining walls wiihm 75 ’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____$1(X).00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER .AITLICATIONS _____$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review- (+ consultant fees) ______$250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$700.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ______$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District______ Present Use of Propen>Residential Other (specify). (month'sear) Li?)> 'V i*/*' U’ * ^ WM « w '■Lcrrc i.'t f ACU f ♦ V *v *»*' A m V V V V V V'i Tl W' • RLCtipr-r.^(AVA' rDL T 1 iva » V 09/: r required submittals 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Completed Application Fonn. ~T Describe request in detail. ------Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (you can obtain thi.» list from Hennepin County Depamnent of Finance, A-603, GovTmment Center, 348-3271). Plat Map. --— Cenificate of Survey (signed by a licensed sur\eyor) - reter to handout for sur%cy information. ., • , j . • j Attach Iceal dcscripncfl to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve ” changes m elevation (grades). V List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an mtcrest m the ------property This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Constniction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements).ConstnicTion pi-m, u v— ------- -----------. ------ As an addendum to this application, please anach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. SUB.MITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawmgs of all documents, plans, etc. to e submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been inc.udtd. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: ---------------------------------- APPLICANT’S SIGNATLTlb or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees tim^pot covered by original fee payment) Administrator agrees to pay and certifies that the informationand/or unusual expensesjneurred ih^Mevv pi this app^^ supplied is true apd^orrect to th^^st-^l^^her kn^^dg^^ orj ^ ^'I ,. , / tAL ' Date r AA.Applicant s signature OW'NER’skiGNATLRE Xh e n/.lintion and further authorized reasonable membecr for utnp^es of and verificption of ^J^eq Owner ’s sigmture I / ll1 /I Applicant muA have all submiry ls ini Planning “yoJ?p.- -a .avuc .h. 4 zooi.. OfBc of this change prior to the meeting t DESCRIPTION OF PROJEC F F.X!!^T1NG SmTATION PRIOR TO PROPOSED IMPROVT^TT:^TS. THE PROPER! 1r’ HAD 2 TINU ER RETAIN!' V VLI S AND STEPS EEADING FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE DECK fO THE DOC K AT THE LAKE THE WALLS AND STEPS WERl- CONSTRUCTED OUT OF ASPFN AND SI BSFQUENTLY ROTTED AND FELL TO THE CTROUND THE TIMBERS LINING DRIVEWAYS NUMBER 1 *AND 2 ARE STILL IN PLACE THE TLslBERS LINING THE DRIVEWAY HAVT ROTTED ANT) WTLL BE REPLACED WlHI NTW PRESSURE TRIIATED PINE THE PROPOSED IMPRONTMENTS ARE SIMPLY REPLACING THE PREVIOUS W.VLLS ANT) STEPS WITH NEW MATERIALS THE ONLY ADDITION WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL RETAINING WALL TO MEET THE CITY’S REQUIREMENT THAT THE WALLS MAY NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT. WITHOUT ENGINEERING AND THERE IS NO ENGINEERING AVAILABLE FOR BOULDER RETAINING W ALLS PHOP< )> 11) IM PRC)M'M ENTS CONSTRUCT 3 RETAINING W'ALLS U) REPLACE THE WALLS THAT HAD FALLEN RECONSTRUCT STEPS FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE DECK LEADING TO THE LAKE REPl ACE EXISTING ROTTED TIMBERS LINING DRI\ EWAYS 31 AND #2 WITH NEW 0 60 PRESSURE TREATED PINE I. RETAINING W A LIN. A RETAINING W'ALLS SI FALL BE CONS FRUCTED OF BOULDERS THE BOULDERS ARE APPROXIMATELY 2 5 FEET LONG X 2 5 FEET WTDE X 2 FEET DI EP i il W'ALL IS APPROXIMATELY 4 FEET HIGH B THE BOULDi KS ARE LARGER ON THE INITIAL ROW ’ AND ARE SET BACK EACH SUBSEQUENT ROW ’ TO INSURE STABII ITY T1 IE BOULDERS ARE CHOSEN IN SUCH A FASHION AS TO INSURE ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRII Y IN OTHER WORDS CERTAIN BOULDERS WILL ITT BE i TER TOGETHER THAN OTHER BOUi-DERS EACH ROW' FOLLOWING THE INITLAL ROW IS SET B \CK APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES FROM THF PRF.CEDINCi ROW ’ C RETAINING WALLS A ” AND “B ’ ARE IN ALMOST 11 IE EXACT I.OCATION AS THE PREVIOUS RETAINING W ALTS RETAINING WALL C" IS IN BETWEEN W ALLS “A ” AND ’ B ’ AND IS BEING CONSTRUCTED 10 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY THE LEN'EL SPACE IN BETW EEN EACH W’ALL 'VILL BE AT LEAST 4 FEET 2.PS raOM THW FSI CORNER OF DFCK TO THK tAKF A STEPS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PINE THAT HAS BEEN 01>0 CCA PRESSURE TREATED THE STEPS WILL BE 42 INCHES WIDE X 36 INCHES I ONG X 6 INCHES HIGH BETWEEN EACH STEP WIITCH IS APPROXIMATELY 36 INCHES. WILL BE 15 INCH R1\TR ROCK VHICH WILL BE t^-DERLAIN BY PLASTIC THE STEPS WILL FOLLOW THE EXISTING CiRADE .AND RETAINING WALL “B , LENTIL THEY ARE ANGI ED IN THE SAME DIRECTION AS THE IXKK THE STEPS WTLL NOT BE BURIED MORE THAN 5 INCHES BENEATH THE SURFACE OF THE GR/ E THE STEPS WILL BE LOCATED IN THE SAME POSITION AS THE PREVIOUS STEPS PRIOR TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS THE STEPS .ARE MARKED ON THE SURV'EY WITH THE LETTE.R C B EACH STEP WILL DROP APPRO.XI.MATELY 6 INCHES FROM THE PREVIOUS STEP UNTIL THE STEPS LEVTiL OUT NEAR THE L.VKE. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE STEPS ARE REPLACING IN LOCATION AND SIZE THE PREV IOUS STEPS WHICH H.VD ROTTED OUT 3. TIMBERS LINING DRIVEWAYS U\ \M> ^2 A DRIVEWAYS AND ARE CURRENTLY LINED WITH 8 IT, 6X6 ASPEN TIMBERS THESE WILL BE REPLACED IN THE E.XACT LOCATION AS THE EXISTING TIMBERS WITH 0 60 PRESSURE TREATED PINE THE TIMBERS WILL FOLLOW THE GRADE OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY. SINCE THESE STILL EXIST THERE WILL BE NO CH.ANGE TO THE HARDCOV ER CA1.CULATIONS A SILT FENCE SILVLL BE INSTALLED TO INSURE MINIMAL RUN OFF INTO THE LAKE THIS SHOLT-D BE INSTALLED BY 10-14-94 r (Of A \ «UM MTt eviv« •, . \Pin COUMTif WBKMT* IHrOg’JTICB STSTIH MOrtVTT 9MtS LIST M»QKT mO , BATCM eol,r;t- ^> MOP MMO' OMCR NWC » ■ TM9AYCRNM€/AOORw* ♦'' TAXPAYtR ., MM/AOm.5)1.-■ ..O '•.'■'MOP ROM e OMNtll fMHE •1^ trxpatii Jj* MMi/ROM St f7-I17-» SZ OMZ OISM PCSr POINT iAi Pieov k StLLXN PCMT L StUIN 1M« nST POINT U MM« m MM*SO orour-zs u eoio 0*731 MOimi SMORl Cl OCfOCS * NfvIR DfNNXS A NEYIR 4«M NMTN SHOn BP NOUNO HM 1550450 B7-U7-Z5 SZ OOlf0474S NOPTN SPOPf OP HEBPMM CPANFOPO fUk NCRMN CPANPOPB 4741 Nk SHORf ORiyC NOUNO M 15544 50 07-117-75 5Z 00Z4 OOeSA AOORESS lOUSSlOCB J R AOPANANSOi/B R0PANANSON JAriES 1 A 0AM4 ABRAHAnSGN 44Z7 TGNMVUH lA hound m S5544-H51 SO 67-117-15 SZ eozo 00050 AOORCSS UNASSXCNAO DtM4ZS A HEYER OtrtlZS A HCVEP 4400 NOPTM SHME DR hound M 15544 • SO 07-117-ZS 5t 0057 01S7S REST POINT RO * H 0 I L K 0CRL1CKER HlCMAtL 0 A LYttC CERLICHER 1571 REST POINT RO HOUND l«4 51544. » / . ^4 P SO 07-117.Z5 5Z 047ZS rSMRAVIEM I*EAT CNRXSTXINSQN EAPi t TIRPV CMPISTIWOGH TOMiLA VXEH IA‘C m 5554450 07-iir-zi ir 001? t47ZS NORTN SHOM M J P MMrr ETAk j p MiMir47ZS Homi MOPS 01f04 105«4SO 07-117-ZS IZ OOZ4 4M58 ADDRESS UNASSIGNiO RATHifCM 6 ASM RATMLEEN C ASM 4507 SNOPfUNt DR tlOl SPRI7C PART 7t4 55504 SO 07-IX7-Z5 IZ 00Z7 0445S TOMIAVIEM LA C J FEWCR A K S FErOCR CHARLES J 7EM«R ZZ15 LINCOLN ST N E HPtS m 55410 50 0 7-U7-Z5 5Z 0050f 01510 REST POINT LA e H REICH A L F REICH S R A S J SCmtOT 1510 REST POINT LANE HOUW m 55544 SO 07-I17-Z5 SZ 0050 01375 REST POINT RO K E AM)CRSCN AAR RRAISR KIRK ANOERSGN 1575 REST POINT RO mound MN 55344 P14554011M 07-117-Z5 5Z 0014 04754 TtPOLAVIEN I*LARRT ARMX.A 6PEEMAACEN IT Ak i GKtWASEN A 4 6RCCNMA0CN 4754 TOrOlAVXEM LANE HOUM} m 5554450 07-117-Z5 it 901004751 NORTH SHOPI DO OltOtlS A HEYER OCFtaS A HIYIR AAOO NORTH SHOn OR nOUNQ 7t« 5554454 07-117.ZS 5Z 00Z59«4ZS TONRAVIEH U R H SHELTON • H L SKELTON R H SHELTON A H L SHELTON 44Z5 TOMLAVIEH LA HOUND MN 5554450 07-117-ZS SZ oo:o 0445S TOMtAVlEH LA DENNIS A MEYER DEFPUS A MEYER A4O0 NORTH SMWI OR HOUND MN 55544 SO 07-117-Z5 5Z 0054 01545 REST POINT ftO R N SIGAFOOS CTAL RA'.RH A CORA SICAF0(£1 1545 REST POINT RO HOUND HN 55544 50 07-1I7-Z5 5Z 0055 01550 REST POINT RO LAS CRAOILL LARRY A SHARON ORABIIL 1550 REST POINT RO hound MN 55544 )J -W*;•*» ‘*■'fea.-r4 4 .*V P-*:VW'-' ■ - •'K-N'* * ‘ " ^ . .r >!' .1 # 4 I kr .•Ve». . -ju ■ ' • TV'i, H* 0- MON* -4?MlX;^,|L?JP !> ■ i ‘ ;*M 07-llf>» U MSS . ^ PW AMS OMM NOSTM SMQRf M \Jh OHMS NAM OOMXS A WYIi *.A.'k^ TA)VAYtt> , OCISaS A MT(R ; . «NAMI/A9M MM NMTH SNOM U~ ' y - ’ HMO Itl S5M4 ►' yU-H i.>At\ AMiMB ^ IC vMOS ASM 01S4* MAT WtW LA V omiA NIM^.' JOSHUA 0 USAM “■V •. ..TAMAYtA . •MSNUA URAM .»; i.t?Hll«/AO»l . ISAI HtSTPOWT UQ r;‘S'..- r^ > Jr. V • HOUM w4 sssM • ,’ I\ * '*\ AOrS;■» ■ '(MCA MAHt; ' TAXPAVtS Si 07-117-2S St MSf 044YS NMTN SMORt M STtPNtN C • jomm A HAM STIPMCN C NASOOi NAIC/AMS " 449S NOSTN SHOAI M- .V. /.:.H0UWm• ■ * it V SUM ■ ■‘■SSOSAOM ' ■'* ‘A OM«R NAMi^ .iJiLTAXPAYtA TOTAL BATCH -^l-HlHi/AMS-*"<> • s*: ^ ^ V V 4 > toi 999Z7 ' ^rnm' ^ »r* ' ' i * * /. -i ■ A I*.‘t » I : .?■■•,_ ‘ V. • • • ■ ri... «.« i ^ « .. A COUNTY PiOMSTY IPgOiPRtTICil STSTIH ATT OI#«AS List MPOST M». P1«S1 PASS Csa tr-117-n u tmszAim RCST POINT LA S J OBTVf R I S R Msr.tv RCVIN J eSOYtS ANB SUSAN H Moves ms AtST RUNT LA fOMCTtlSTA m 5S5AA S» A7-U7-II It toss•AATf MDSrS SNOSf M T c COSStN I J L mSYCLOT TTLIA C COSilM AMS NO SMOSf M NOUNO M« ASIA*i--' *:>M t7-ll7-tS St MSA (MMS NOSTH SNORI CS T C COMIN A J L NlVtLOT T C COSSIN I J I HXSPlLSr AASS NOSTM SMOSf BS »UNO m S5SAA SB •7-U7-tS St MSS •ATOS NORTH SNOSf OS R A CRAMYOM I A C CBAMPOni BOOMT A • M4 C CRANPQRO SON SABCAKPRCl AZ 65177M 07-117>tS St 00«1 01S71 RCST POINT LA KI7MTH N A UN5I 6 C^3T KCNNfTH N A RfNCI 6 CCOABT 1171 HST POINT LA NOUNS m SSIAA SB 07-117-tl IS MU BiSBS RCST POINT BO SUZAtM I MJSTIN SUZAPMi AUSTIN ttS OARNOOe SO MOPRINS W4 SSlAS P / 1 CCRTIfY THAT THt TACTS RfPRfSCNTCO ARC AN ACCURATC ANO TROC StPSCStNTATION Of INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS OATI ON THt RCCOR05 OP THE MCM4CPIN COUNTY BCPARTHCNT M PROPCRTY TAXATION, TO TNI BEST OF NY UOS.COCE UK SCLliF. SATE erts - " y «?*• o % ■ •■ iT 4--■■■>. • V*' I • r m Bonestfoo Rosene Afxlef1tk& Associates rt « C.mm The^i«i I ^ a rf ^wif^ m 9bm^ C Engineers ft ArcNtecfs October 11. 1994 ■ •« •f I * «o«P P% O ^ ft « IP^ * mngfmr‘ ^ T *1 %« a at C t^^sgaKl ftf ft VUft at a «Mi ^ I UPt ft'Cft « ftf C P% jm O ftf ^ at i af fti‘wip^ a at %ft»« ft Mi at ftM A ip« at m Mm at aaiA i Gftrmr ft ft Omi i t J tam at ft M %amft it Mi r MK at ftmi at i PAMOMi at Ma* i ^Pia«AftA Pf 4ft^D ■■pM Pi i MPMw PI pmft MP P« D at CftCiPiOM Pf aiMQ mma pi im a Oma at CNpm ft M ^ aaaM^ li a I Nt?. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Adminlstralor Cit)r of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crvstal Bav, Minnesota 55323 Re: Corbin Residence File No 139.1974 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the amended plans for the boulder wall on the Corbin residence al 4685 North Shore Drive. The most recent plans call for a Ihree-fier boulder wall with a ma.\imum height of 4 feet and a minimum spacing of 4 feet between the tieis. 1 his change will move the top wall further north I he proposed three-tier wall as shown on the survey and described in the narrative is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter Yours verv’ truly. DONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDl-Rl IK ASSOCIAIES. INC y/zi^ujyf Shavni D. Gustafson. P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 r BonestfOO Rcsene Anctefllk <& Associates CM»e rnrwmm n C ^ I f« f ft f Pt r G ^ « C t A Engineert A Architects October 6. 19^ C MM C tMPA •?* «. iSiMedkgn Af A Mjf^^er Af V T tmjiinMH. Pf •M n C iM^iiiA ^ A kta ^ J kiMlBII. ff trmt Pf A •fc, A.C ^I C L<si** *f O WwtiAA Pf %I9« .: ^ C Pf Hlwtt * km ^ m Pf PM i CmW. a ( A Oiem» 4 Mgpwow Pf P K* khi^ pf PhAp J C WAP Pf MAP* ■ Pf Pf Pf C Af^M Pf P M Pw> Pi m«p t mm pf j apTM Pf O QiPimim Pf Cmm OfcM Pf PMO PPMI" Pf MW P (jftMi Pf CM«M A IfAftasP imM pppiPfm ft OAPP Ms. Jeanne A. Mabiisth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of On>no Post Otticc Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Rc: Corbin RcsiderKC File No. 139 1971 Dear Jeanne. We have inspected the partially constructed KiulJcr wall on the Coibin residence at 4685 North Shore Drive, llic majoritv of the two walls arc 4-feet high which is the maximum height recommended without structural design. Many of the boulders are approximately 12 to 18 inches in diameter which is generally not adequate lor a grasity type retaining wall such as this. A portion of the wall along the gravel driveway is approximately 7-tcet high, llic proposed wall, amstruction techniques and soils arc not acceptable for a wall of this height. The City slH>uId not continue a review of this application until a plan has been prepared by a Registered Engineer. Information which is critical for this type of project includes: - methtxl of providing drainage for walls - method of tic-back restraint for wall - geotechnical evaluation and'or type of fill proposed We would recommend a modular masonry block wall be used for any wall over 4-feet high. IhcfC arc many manufacturers which provide an engineered wall system for almost any application. The wall should have a draintilc line installed to function properly in clay soils. We do not recommend gravity type retaining walls, such as boulder walls, due to the difficulty in determining their effectiveness or durability. /\s an option, the grading above the walls could be modified so that no walls in excess of 4-feet high are necessary. If this option is preferred, a grading plan should be prepared. Silt fence should be installed along the grading limits for erosion control in either case. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter, Yours verv trulv,^ •/ BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 ... r HARDCO\TR CALCULATION WORKSHEET sn*ACK ZONX: (cmciE O.SX, (Q)SOO-K •rr-*^ tN ?Q&j£ A- Houm Uae^ X X X B, Cange C. Driveway %o X X ii D. Swlewaik X E. Paiio/Decfc lo X X X.6 F. Landscape UDderiaiti By Plastic X X X G. Otter tot.\l h.\rdcover in zone total PROPERg^A IN ZONE ^ ^ pgr>P(->!>FD TT yRncoyTR IN ZOl£E ■Ar- LcQfih 7ono X X X Vb'idih % B. Garage C. Driveway ^ . X X \1- D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/'Deck __Xo X X 2*6 Underiain By Plastic (^O Ho X X X kz G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER LN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA LN ZONE ^ '2- 50 x 100 S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 5kO S.F. S.F. S,F S.F SO S.F. S-F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. l4o _S.F. _________S.F. \^d ____S.F. f *f(P S.F. ^(.>0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 60 S.F. S.F. 2Xl) S.F. X40 S.F. S.F.ns S.F. S.F. S.F. Xo^O B A B A B HARDCONTR CALCIILATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZOST: (CIRCLE aNE) ®-75'25-JW fTTSTlNG hardcove r IS ZOSE A. Ho«i« _______________ 4T-1 j±5 X X X wica _o M2 B. Gxrafc (y C. Dnveway3 ■gY 6 3(cJ I £ X 12L 12=. 60 \VvV ^ 6» Pmi ?>lQ I X I 2.no. 9.0 X X 3a ^ Dec-^ (JQ P.“'L-iuUj»ipe t*gjgirxgi O X X X il G. OtiifT TOTAL hardcover IN’ ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AR£*\ LN ZONE • A >"7 ^ B 2>Vj3c?0 X 100 PROPOSED HARDCQVTR IN ZONT lllJUg g ________ 6W4'ttrtvvv^ LfCfLn Wui:h B. Garasc X X X C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X LoUsILdipl^r) 20 ^ j la X X X 2^ G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL P^^^ALS ZONEB X 100 S.F. ^ 8^. S S.F. S.F. s F. L?oc>S.F. S.F 24oC> S.F. S.F. 930 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _!___ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. A S.F. B A B U* mr: t CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TYLER CORBIN ^ .*»IN LOTS 77. AND 78. TONKAVIEW GARDENS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA * Afe JfgCAP PPSCAimOH or PUgMISES SUWVeVFf)t 77# Tonkavi«w Cardans, and that Tonkaviaw Cardsns das- crlbad as followsi haglnnlnq at a point in tha North lino o( aald M 71, which point is «l foot lattsrly froa tha Northwest cornar Of aald loti thanca Southwsatsrly fjl ^ atral9ht lina to a point on th# shora of taka Ninnstonka dia> faat Southaasterly oaa* auro4 alonf tha ahora of said lake rroa tha foathwaat cornar of said lot 7I| thOMS Southaastariy along tha ahora of said laka 24.5S fast ••“‘^•••tarly cornar of said aaid last naawd cornar also oaing tha aoat Boutharly corner of aaid tot 78I thanoa Northsastarly along toukhaaatarly line of said lot a diatanca of 240 fast to tha Mat lastarly cornar of said loti Manna Northwastarly along tha North- Matarrr and Northarly linss of said Jot a diatanca of m.2 fast |«lht of bagfoning. ai danotaa Iron aarkar aat ' ' #1 dfnotaa iron aarkar found “PoniM pgauoad datua. jy*^*'*!^*^ ^nt«hda to show tha ^^l^^aomidariaa af tha abova dascribad ftoparty# and tha location of an ••••tlhg houaa# dock# graval driva- ;/^^'Y/>TMy, and atona ratalning walla • ** «loaa not purport to other koprovaasnea or aporaachawnta. / V.« OTAWNPY « #S-.^ ♦ . StViMaN PAIY ntacw'tkvv COFFIN & CRONBERG, INC I K-nK iviliu ihil lN« Mnrv pnpinrdbil i*w iW uadr* av ditrlt lupvr* #nU l^Jl I jmrduljr iqii»irnniCivHLA^|nc«f mdUndSurvryuriiAtlrr thi* Um> irf Ik* S<Jk- 111 Minnoutr Milk > MotnrluU Uornw lYumhrr I17M VC a LI\'>vf UATt fOSNO ! li ti- To:Ororio Planning CommissK^n Mcmhcrs Ntayor Callahan and Oront^ C imncilmenihers Ren Moorsc, Citv AdminisiraU^r From:Jeanne A. Duilding & 2kming Administraior Date:October 13. 1994 Subject: #1975 Urn Anhalt, 2190 Wa>/ata Boulevard Appeals - Public Hearing Zoning District: B-l/RR-lB Application* Applicant has bt*en brought in on an appeals application to confinn that proposed use would conlorm to permitted use within the U-l zone ("garages") and to also review required planning issues agreed to by both City and ow ner of the property at tlK- time ot the Sugar W wds subdivision There are several land use matters that must be resolved belore a commercial use can be installed on this property. Applicant’s business. Pro Tire and Exhaust, is located in the Ixmg Lake Industrial Park at 571 Tamarack A\enue. The following ordinances are penmeni to this review; Section 10.06, Subdivision 3. 3 (B) - Appeal. Directives of Comp Plan and existing zoning boundaries would not allow City to issue applicant conditional use permit for proposed use until specirtc land use matters are resolved. Section 10.40. Subdivision 4 (A) - Garage. Applicant would apply under this section for a conditional use permit to allow the pro^wsed use. The Planning Commission is asked to rev 'ew the proposed use to confirm conformance with the ordinance. 3. Review Section 10.40. Subdivision 1 - Purpose/Intent of Zoning District 4.Section 10.40. Subdivision 6 - IM Standards. A. Required lot area * 20,(XX) s.t. existing = 46,206 s.f. ±, B.Required lot width = 100 Exiling = 148’ C.Front yard = 20’ Pioposed = 40’ D.Rear yard = 30’ Proposed = 30’ Zoning File #1975 October 13, 1994 Pace 2 E.Required structure setbacks. Front and rear Required = 35’ Proposed front = 114’ F’roposed rear = 60 ’ Side Required West side East side 15’ 15’ 72’ F.Height limitation = 2'/i stories or 30’. Applicant has not provided elevations of structure at this point in the review. List uf Exhibits A B C D E F G H I J K L M N ' O P-1 P-2 Q Application Addendum Plat Map Property Owners ’ List Survey of Outlet E Gustafson Report Engineer ’s Conceptual Transportation Plan Engineer ’s Amendment to the Site Plan Page 4 of Resolution No. 2653, Approval of Sugar Woods Plat-Rclcrences to Outlets E, E and F Supplement to Subdivider’s Agreement for Sugar Woods First Amendment to Declaration ot Covenants tor Sugar ^^oods Paces 49-52. Comp Plan Amendment No. 2. Alternatives for Development ot Property and Surrounding Area Transportation Plan Comp Plan Amendment No. 2, Pages 61 6c 62 Commercial Site Plan Site Data Official Zoning .Map Zoning Boundary Map-Detail Ordinance No. 64. Second Series, Zoning Boundary Change as a Result ot Sugar Woods Plat. Rezoning to R-IA Sewer and Water As-Builts Zoning File r?1975 October 13, 1994 Page 3 Rericw of Application ITie current owner of the property is offering Outlet E for sale for commercial use. The majority of this property except for the north 55' is zoned B-1. Retail Sales Business District. The proposed use would involve the selling of tires, exhaust systems, alignments, shivks. struts, trailer hitches, oil changes and brake serx ice. The proposed use includes not just retail sales of the various items but also of the servicing and installation. There is little direction in your cixlc. There is no deftnition fi'r a garage. The zoning code conditional use section merely states that garaces for the servicing and repair of automobiles are allowed provided repair functions aie totally enclosed in a building. Review the purpose or intent of the code. Subdivision 1. You may w ish to visit the facility within the Long Lake Industrial Park on the south side of Highway 12. Outlot E was created w ith the platting of the Sugar Woods subdivision. The property w^as originally connected ti> Rebers* commercial property to the east with the creation of Outlot D. an outlot platted to ensure future connection to a frontage road platted in the Otten property, review Exhibit D. A subdivision will be required to reclassify the parcel as a buildable lot. A building permit can not be i.ssued until this is completed. Outlots within the Sugar Woods subdivision, located within Rebers commercial corridor, were set aside tor lulure consideration but with specific planning goals. (Review Exhibits 1. J and K) Review Exhibits P-l and P-2, the directives of Comp Plan Amendment No. 2. Tlie nonhern boundary of the B-1 zoning district must be extended 55 ’ to the north. Tlie 55 ’ corridor zoned RR-IB is a remainder from the original Sugar Woods ’ rezoning that re/oned the upper portions to the R-IA zone. Outlot E was not designated as a buildable lot but based on the factual findings noted above, the outlot would meet the standards required tor the creation of a lot w ithin the B-1 zoning district. Review E.xhibits I, J, K. L. M and N. all documentation created for the Sugar Wmxls plat advised the subdivider and current owner that when the commercial properties were to be developed that frontage road would have to be designated. With the redefining of Outlot E to a buildable I >t, the City will expect at a minimum that the east/west road be defined within that plat. Access to this site is very difficult to resolve at this writing because w’e ha\e yet to hear from Mn DOT. The upcoming safety improvements in 1995 may prohibit creation of ;i new curb cut. Anv access approved at Highway 12 would be temporary' as it is the goal of Comp Man .Amendment No. 2 to have all commercial uses served by the future frontage road. Gustafson in his repon (Exhibit F) notes that applicant should provide information on the site plan as to how future access to the frontage road to the north would be provided. Engineer has recommended that a temporary solution for the property might be creation of a shared access with the Wear property to the immediate east. Review Exhibits F. G and H. Gustafson s report, sketches of a potential frontage road kication and sighting of the temporary shared access. Zoning File #1975 October 13. 1994 Page 4 Review Exhibit R sewer and water arc immediately available to this property at Highway P The OTner has been assessed 44 sewer and water units The payments currently ass^sed acainsi this properts involve the 1989 Highway 12 trunk sewer and water improvements^ There a?e additional improvements proposed next year within this sewer and water d.sirtct Once number of units have been determined to meet the needs ol the proposed use on Outlot h. tlw owner should advise how many units he wishet to assign to applicant s property as part ol sale agreement. Applicam may wish to keep all 44 units for Outlot F In this ease, the tity will (directly charge the future owner sewer and water units. General Comments on Proposed Site Plan It would appear that all required setbacks for proposed improvements have heen met. It ts difficult to comment on the irafTic design and How on site as we arc not certam as to wtere access w ill he coming from We must question the car wash. Is ii the nuvmiion of Ihe applicant to have a car wash for the general public use or is ihis just for the clients ol the tacility^ Ca washers are usually assessed several sewer and water units The Kxiation ol the cat wash may be an issue later in the more formal review. Issues for Resolve 1. Is the use permitted based on the purpose/intent of the B-1 Retail Sales Business District and per the lecommendation set forth in Comp Plan Amendment t o. - for this area (Properly No. 4. Exhibit D? a If the use is found compatible with the B-1 zoning district, the following matters *■ must he resolved by current owner of property before a fomtal cond.ttonal use permit application can be accepted by the City: Subdivision of property redesignating outlot to a lot and defining of a future east/west road. a. 3. Rezoning of 55’ RR-IB parcel to B-1. Resolve of temporary access to this property if the frontage road is not installed to north at this lime. Impact of 1995 safety improvements on Outlets E and F .... need tor additional dedication of road right-of-way or drainageway/retention area. Upon filing of a conditional use permit with the City, applicant shall provide the following: b. c. d. Zoning File #1975 October 13. 1994 Page 5 Site plan'surve>’ locating all improwments. b. Detailed grading and drainage plan c.Landscaping plan plus planting scl^dule. fiimhes. Applicant is again advi«a of the need to t»« exceed a 30 height. Preparation for a permit application -vith the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to review all grading and drainage plans. Planning Commission Action The only action of the Planning Commission is lo comlrm f" .mist be redesignated as a buildable lot. the northern 55 of the par-ci and temporary access to site must be resolved. Isv ^—*-■ •-n /—\ J '■ ^ ‘ ••• ♦ J cm’ OF ORONO - CFSTILtL L.4M) USE APPLICATION jL P\ PROPERTY LOCATION y . ^ Site Address Q<^ f- <0 ^ Type of Application to be Filed __________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ~_l)u !! .APPLICANT iU *to -S\ PLICANT , r\ \ \ Name^<S>>W\j/ /-]yxk<A.Vr Address ^ 1 I "TV- nx>nc tlx>me) Pht^ne <work> <xxJ.^A-^ir> Zip_j^:^ SSrr.__ OW’N'ER (iLdi^erem^Oian applicant) Name ^ • C2. r7<-P<-A^‘ _ ,____A^-^o Phone (h«ne)_ Date Property Acquired_____________________ I ^^(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use $200.00 In-stitutioiui (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House.Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex CrediPBldg _____$250.00 Commercial Industrial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD/PI D - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change fn-'m original application) Atter-lhc-Faci Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$250.00 Vacation _____$175.00 Easement Vacation _____S 75.00 Easement Vacation With SuMivision _____$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District_____^J[ Present Use of Property Residential 6 Othei (specify^ (monih.'year) Ciry iP , v.'» • aw4. V*. VV va Tf r u. a V V • 1a V v't • f CnCK uLiiiP> .’ww wvvi liOi liovv:.- i SUBMITTALS j Complctrd Apriication Form. \/ Describe request in deuil. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (\ou can obtain this list from —Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603, Govemroeni Center, 348-3271). Cemficate of Suney (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades) 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. .changes in elevation (grades). l^i$t of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the "^^property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). v/ Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separalc list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF L.\R(JE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR ^p“dI>CTIO.N (II” X 17" OR SMALLER. FOR ALL DOCOMEN-^ SUBMITTED. (Staff w’ill require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Propeny Owner must sign this application Please remember that your application is not complete if the above inlormation has not been included. Ceriif.cation by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:__________________________---------------------- APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE .. i. u rr The applicani hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the ^ning Administrator, agrees to pay addmonal fees (staff time not covered *’7 and/or unusuai expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that e tn o supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature ^Date OW^TR’S SIGNATURE ^ ^ ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorued reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Councu members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's si™. _________ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meetings arc held on the third Monday of each month. scheduled meeting, review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicantouiMino & Zoning Office please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and a vis of this change prior to the meetmg. ■I m I fitf c »- PRO TIRE i EXHAUST <5,71 TAMARACK AVE LONG LAKE, HN. 55356, (bl2 ) 473-4261 4, 1444 7^-3 o ^ JL /kJ To Uhoffl It May Concern: Thank You for taking the time to consider our request. Pro Tire & Exhaust has been a great success to date and tor this rea son. we are looking to expand. The proposed biulding site is bet ween Bill Wears (Orono Self Serve) ana Cliff Ottens (Ottens Bros Nursery ). The only drawback to our business has been a lack of visibil ity, traffic flow, and especially space. Being on highway 12 would give us the visibility needed to serve this areas needs and also to double our business in 1-2 years. Our business includes selling Tires. Exhaust (both Stock and Custom). Alignments. Shocks. Struts, Trailer Hitches and Oil Chang es. In a new facility we ..ould add Brakes to our Services. We do not perform engine or transmission repairs, thereby eliminating e greasy, junk accumulating mess associated with those types of repairs. Most repairs are completed the same day or the vehicle arriving so we would not have vehicles stored for extended periods. As tor the was te issue, all junk tires would be stored neatly out of . the building with -egular scheduled pickups by liscensed haulers. Old oil and filters would be stored properly above ground and disposed or by liscensed haulers. Currently our business hours are Monday thru Friday 6:00 p.m. and Saturday 8:00 a.m.- 1:00 p.m.. In a new facility we would extend our hours to Monday thru Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. and Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.. Because the nature of our business is such that we do not typ ically see our customers 1-2 times a year we need the high visibi lity of the highway and it’s traffic count in order for our busi ness to thrive. We believe that the proposed location would easily double our business within 1-2 years and hopefully triple in 3 years thereby generating substantial revenues both for our business and the cities. We welcome any Questions or concerns that you may have while deciding on our request. Once again. Thank You for your time and consideration given to this proposal! Sincerely, .jrence wS^Lawrence Owner nhalt ?505.65 >R^i)/I ^ i- \ »‘*1 ______________ ’;5tf /«- - -V 3»S»4 ^’C i*rn f \ *1 1 (5) z 51 ' (4) ?(3) g >v n C'^ ' StnoT c ..\ DR) (30^ ’ P(t3) I / 151. u . v/y97/7y////////y M ® 2TOg^/;pgp>ggg#gi» EJ«. 14««*»*orf U/T(ot • i^ARkwo J 3 Ji (17) :: S25»^SESliii ooc m ^ S 35\42 a fl7*4rt ^B'.3» ” •0>.03 (20 S on 01 • ^ (25) * if ^ __DRLJWV> •71.04 5V ’ ^ ^ V * >• T 3 • 5 (26) g (2T) = 100 no 567*4 I*C ounoT p (50) (44) 40^6 3 (25)2 jmLT4 - •‘.'-a 742A R/^ '« » WAYZATA BLVD W d PLAT )M.M S(») c KEll (24) IM BO. 01 jI slot ?n.i 2 ;aR •w (40)^ B B ??i.W a! '0.0, S (25) p ^43 I (2S) sociiasiseiAL (35) C5 ----------------j. (26) (76) I K*>’^ « 8 (10) 8b : I*:JSDJ.<#> PI S OI B TrtT5 |)bbt5fV,o|cMo i'03 B ' P (46) - C 1 3 (47) z, ; (»• • (31): (30) 144 II (43) 7^ (43) i (») j i - imSTRtAL iPARKi T*4 53 t«»•« S 145 (49)I P S..3. '^(?5) ®7sf taO S5 N (i) (2?) « (23) *1 ” (55)*nn 9 1015 (56) 140 H 38V3I «€i*52*4yf 1*0 9014? .318.83- n (^9) i (5D) i (50 00 'a Txnti fg) .1. a('o)A<:...:......v- a»* 44130 ■NORWEWf 7 r% (<6)Ufl55 TTT ij 8 ^00 ‘V •'‘•’I (6) 2636.1 1 RES 4A>- ■■ RUN DAT! Ot/tS/H .*! lulnM (n) 13 *> (20., UTCN MS. •raoR ktmOM€R NAHI , TAXRAYCII ^ NAM/AOM]W ,MOP AMM ^ OMCR tMm ^ TWAYfR vHWC/AOm■•-»,,'*-XMOR AOM/'.(MCA NAMI TA)9AYEA NANE/AOOA.[IVmiop’ adoa(MCA HMC TAMAAYEA /AOOA ^ AAOA AOOA (MCA NAME 4 TAXPAYER /:!!* ; , fc-, ^ ‘' r-- Si S4-iia-2S met enW MAYZATA tiVO M KILLXAH N Nf Alt A HXri MlUIAH N NCAA ZIAO MAYZATA SLVO tXD^ LONG LAKE HN SS354Si Si-llS-ZS Z1 90AS OZIM StXAtHOOO Di KHRS CONSTRUCTION CO RfKIIS CONSTRUCTION CO SSZS NCBSTER AVf HRtS HN SSA14Si S4-lli-ZS ZZ 0017 02Z5I RIN6 RZDOC tA CAL om MCLxrroRO a louisc ottenR 0 iOK ZAOLONG LARC HN 5555A7Z SA-lli-Z3 Z5 0000 OOSZO MXHNALL AVE CARL N DAY A SONS INC JAN RRORCRTXCS INC ZiU HCRCNZIC RT RO KAYZATA HN 55101 7Z SA-lli-ZS ZA OOOZ 0Z07S KAYZATA RLVO H GREGORY H SHAUGHNESSY LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR INC Z07S N KAYZATA RLVO R 0 SOX A07 LONG LAKE Itl 55S5A RENNERIfJ COUNTY RRORERTY INFORHATION SYSTCH RROIKRTY Olt€RS LISTIB SA-11S-Z5 Z1 WZl ozioz suoARHOoo tm l^SERS CCNSTSUCTICN CO RFRERS CONSTRUCTION CO 35Z5 ICBSTER A\T HRLS HN 55A1ASi SA-iii-zs zi ooxz000X8 ADDRESS UNASSK^O SIDNEY S A SARSARA REEIRS SIDNEY 8 A SARSARA RESLRS 35Z5 NEBSTCR AVE ST LOUIS RAM m S5AIAIB SA-118-ZX ZA 0001 OZIZO KAYZATA SLVO H HULIAH NEAR ETAL KllLIAH H HEAR SA HACRSERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN SS5SA7Z S4-118-ZS ZS 0CZ5 0ZZZ5 KAYZATA SLVO H PERRY'S VENTURES INC PERRY'S VENTURES ITC ZZ05 K KAYZATA SLVO LONS LARE HN 55X56 7Z X6-118-ZX ZA 0048 0Z07X KAYZATA SLVO K GREGORY H SHAIE^HNESSY LONS LAKE FORD TRACTOR INC Z07S H KAYZATA SLVO R 0 SOX 6Y7 LONG LAKE HN 55X56 REPORT NO. RIAX5A01 RAGE 8 V n >• r A- ^ ■. ..-Vi- 3S S4-118-25 21 W22 0210O SUGAi^lOOO D«(TtMts construction CORC8CR3 COffSTRUCTIOM CO 3525 HEPSTtR »VC (9t3 MN 55<«143« 34-1U-2S n 091S (KKISS 4D0PESS PCN0IN6 c • I omNcurroRB a louisi orrtu•ox 24YLCNS UXC m 553553« 55-118-23 25 0058 _•0038 AODKSS UNASSlGNCO SIONFY 8 < BARBARA REBERS SIDNEY » A BARBARA REBERS 3525 HEBSTER AVE ST LOUIS PARK MN 5541472 34-118-23 23 B05S02205 HAV7ATA BLVO M PERRY’S VENTURES INC PERRY’S VENTURES INC 2205 NAYZATA BLVO N LONG URE Itl 55354 V,t'.• ; y I •»* !{:' '■ i TA f' .VJfi TOTAL BATCH ^ % OOX 00014 ■-tin'' A JKf> ■ 4 ' i i Ar i ■ - -I r . ^ ^r•^e<2r' i ■ ’,-4? ^ .-'y |m MTCN BOS'It.-’ . . B ^ •■ •is 5W ■ • uV ' »:v»■'. ■ J*t'j* •*" ' • ’ T 'Tv'.*54!-r-l >- ■?;:■<■'•-i/i i' Vi“ t ,i I .-'4' * ^ ^ •.f*-3 Wi” V I' K Ai Civ v ..•,■■ ■jK’’ '.'• !.. -’• t j;., ■„ '"•W- •' ' ’ ' • .jT Sr#^'- - 1;^ 4>, f > I -N- ■* \ y y 1 “ vf ■' *,V HI,.4 ^, '\ ** i•'ii- 4 '* ‘ ‘*:x4v.rV, ( •*S V > ;^‘ .- i / .- A ■( 1 Si'tdK ■ . .V NUN DAT! Oe/2S/t%•I/, -' - . > > •n-Y"vr ■<■ •;: " ■m'•Mi/n ■ ‘■ -7<^ • • • • •«wrt-" ^%^ *i>%*r ^^y>’^f:, • j' i' "" ■■ •» ,: . - -m<v .V/'--I--*bji.-Jjf^ ■■ - ■-* v*i if*\.i'- ■.4-'■>.’ ■-x' ^L-*.«t##/: ;. f45■m i-% -'t ^ .■ '■ - i. ‘ t*.: ^ .• A' • V ' v-vi' % * •- T '* •' , •• • - ; < » - V..: *.. . 4 • . _ . o iQt'.'ii' * # ':■;> i^.’v--H;y* V'- <-■ > •:>:' V . I * ■ ■ X I'. ‘ ■4|pWg|. ■■■ v". .'• -f,- ^I^4rr Vf,Vx.. : r HirmCPIN county WWPtATY INroRMATK*! SYSTEH M8»t«TY QMCRS LIST tCraRT NO. P14SS401AAGC {*. P'k *’ udM). .* ’*. . ••■ x‘.'‘ ’/.{. . • •■ •*?♦•'s* ' /'irtkt ''#^'■■ft*’r r■. ,V ^ 1> ■-’• "k* *1 * -r? .. 1 >vCD4 .ir'1;<’;• -r^' > ■ j■ - tL'- \...- i'%oxX CtRTIfY THAT TMf FACTS RERRCSENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AMO TRUE RERRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEf#€PIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE OEST OF NY KNOMLEDGE AND OELIEF. DATE ^ * ri 4 »»• ... .V * V ■! 'V '' w •'’ *'♦ i! *• ' Si**' •*••% M "t fn>'4 •; * i S :i,.i f:' .lY4-^*v'.'j ‘-: iv' ' #* s» * >/r4. ' i'..:5tSi■.N■<t■ /Ii: •■/ j:.- 14. % * I* I ; ir II Sk! ?^V* LV; '• • t v" ■i. -i?? '■1 // / •?s/ "V / / /•I ^F.'j'*:-tp o>. • •. “4*''*. :(!?<?■ * / 6.49 / \ ^^278.03- - z -^ 3: »-w V -/T v'^' TORRENS case;, l^ i-hJ >10 \ NO. 17100 L^'-p/J-------Z__ - -334.96- -I / ^ili ^ log, j j /iL ''334.52"EAs^ i I (^0^T9S q3 E-'"' s« I ,r il ' n >i!l /188.9. 0219‘t)0" • wm j; - • w ■J I,.M —',.1''.:? • ■' I^ . - L'Avj^ >n ■ ‘■if;-': ‘ii ■ ■ ■ 4'-v'l / ‘/ '■' h i ' ■•e. I * * . I I I ,<-» • ;■ T^il.'V?.’.- / ( N 02®19'00” E — 231.71 meas .^^ Im mill MfillipII ';'„ SC' ‘ n i- 5;mo'tSi OOOoCaJ ■.■• 3 TORRENS CASE NO. 17100 212.24 \ s 5 —ts TOO CU>fc) So fo* I I1 3^5; p ^C 'N s t c:3 m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates One G PfA ^c ’vr-'e • jo^ear C •’IL Sor^JWI9x ^ e *i.r^ **tO.e'V- • L X« Vsjr M £ner*<r C Engineers A Architects Ortober 7. 199-1 A <^jrtrw3AWf A Qc*dOh Af «L«-1 * Pffi4.*%4»<3 \* «e* ®€:: jwd o Lcwoc# A£*C<»*T C •uVieA A I A.e*^, • ?(Xj<OOr PfA Pf Mun^ ^ P£ In a P€ Thom« • Andr^on A i A Dgr jnj C Pf Thomas A P£ PAAje^ J Swnoewe •£ ivnar Pf V.. *'.w P Pf Agr*^, V rr>g AiC •’»HXn** * ^Wpevin PAC ^v »x ^ P|# Pfew D P£St**Kt Pfc*^nnr»fs P Anomon P£ S flt»PV P£ A sru, P£ A MtJnen f£ P^ J Gannon A i A DiTiiW J faqpwi PC * P<« VhriitJt PC p^.'v J CaiiMAi PC Mjm 0 P£ MAPS 9 :prmp^ PC L PA^ G%JVP1. Pfi •t^rpn L a^fnp« P£ Gaty O iCf.«o«t7 Pft >1,1 eestii« Pf • ''a«a *^5 DD c MI j dPrXX PC Vs#»in O Gk/9LJf\on Pf Cei « 0»\A^ pf G Pf X>hn P Gunjpf Pf C^^nrs A ffA.AMY> tPC M PJK»IPAA% H,#run M C^wsn c C^jpPv».rl OCT 11 1994 <-A* ' ^ Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crvstal Bav, Minnesota 55323 Re: Pro Tire & Elxhaust File No. 139-1975 Dear Jeanne. We have reviewed the site plan for Pro Tire and Exhaust located on Outlet F£. Sugar Woods addition along the North side of Highway 12. 0.25 miles west of Brown Road. The access onto Highway 12 is a major concern. We have forwarded the site plan to Mn/DOTfor their review but have not vet received their comments. I'ntil the application has been reviewed and approved bv .MnDOT, we cannot determine if the site plan is feasible. We are certain that access to Highway 12 will be more restricted in the future. The City should plan for an east-west frontage road between North Brown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road (see figure 1. it is only a schematic). WTien this road is completed, the commercial area along the north side of Highway 12 would access to the north. ITie proposed site plan should show how the future access would be orientated. The Highway 12 safety improvement project scheduled for 1995 will include a median on Highway 12 that restricts the access to right-in and right-out only. These improvements will likely require additional right-of-way along the north side of Highway 12. If the new access to Outlot E is approved by MnDOT. we would recommend that it be a shared access with the adjacent property, and that it includes a right-turn lane. Fhis would require that a 40 X 50 ’ right-of-wav be acquired on the lot line for the access (see figure 2). Any changes in the right-of-way would change the setback locations and impact the site plan. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. 2). A Shawm D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 1vD t- m "If CITY Of 'LONG LAKE ; i- ^ . > t. Ct • uj a: ••I * V » ‘J : o • *«I 0 i • -«•_ ^------ i 11\ ^ *• ** *• ji i ’ i uj' ’ '* *r^ 1 ■^ V -“(-.v.M ^ 1 » f . • .• •1 ■ i ._-M_-- r u i, # • / r ^ 1 CITY I OF 1 ORONO City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^653_ _ _ _ _ 2 All construction vehicles used for the installation of the private rc”d .hell enter and exit only fron U.S. Highway 12 The subdivider is to provide appropriate signage to rFifSEir£North The subdivider shall be held responsible for the enforcement of the approved traffic pattern. 3 Prior to the filing of the final plat, associated documents and covenants, the subdivider shall have completed the execution of an agreement or petition agreeing to pay without appeal for sanitary sewer and water lines to be installed in or near Highway 12 by the City. 4. Outlot D, a portion of future east/west road located within the conmercial zoned portion of ^he property, s a be installed at the time of the development of Outlets ^ F or the development of the Wear property (unless the City has obtained an alternate legal access through Outlot E to the Wear property all subject to the approval of the City). 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Registrar of Titles on or before oanuary 10, 1990 together with a certified original copy of this and executed copies of the easements and covenants noteo above. The execution of the plat by the City of Orono an the filing of the plat shall be conclusive subdivider has satisfied all conditions set forth in this resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above I" ‘ha event, it will be necessary to file a new application it City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 10th day of July, 1989. Hallin, City Clerk es R. Gra V Page 4 cf 5 •ic I L. 20403C0 \ nStBT AriC!*!^-**^ TO DL’Cl.An.MICH • COVC3f.frt9, COKDXTIOHS. lltST tlCTIOPr AMD rASrAFMi T^JS SUGAR ^ TI1’» unsT ^hct^mrsr !• ^^ao t:.i* i:t; uiy >r . i?.” * or Construrtion Co.. n fUmi«-Ot.A coiporit;-n C.V.^ -U«clar»nt-) , Sucar Woods lls««cwn«r- .\r««cciat.Jon, Inc., a r.jnn-^oi non-profit corporation (tne -Asacci.At:on"; atnl U vj Naticnal Association (tti^ "Lendar"). E_EJLJJLI>L_k_J» ^ 0*cl»Jration cf Covon-Anta. ConJltio»»a. Rastrlctio'A R.qiatrar of Tilla* on Saptenbar 13. 19«9 «» Ocrumcnt !!o. *CI.^3 - . B. Tha Daclaraticn c jvara tna raal prciMirty i.-> iloniivi.... County, «innasot.A, logallv Uasri ibcd ns :c,Uoos: lota 1 thro^i'^h Ulocr. 1: Lots 1 t’ircuub S, niorH 3; Lots 1 thiouqti 9, IllccJt 3; Lots 1 throu'jt; S, ftl'JcK *: outlets A. D and C; — •" -7 .Ai* ill TCG'n woous, ncfjordi'*': t’laraof. to C. 3y I?r»c>iC cJM.(»d Scptanijcr «<, ‘ ' * •’, of tha li<*ii:'.Jnn Couiity n.'’iistt.‘.r jf Titl'.'i. o;. at iocuL:nt Nos. 20387?! and :!OU.7 92. the Uty^of .r.no. ^c-;n:. .. ecsc-Rcnt for public road purpes^ps c/er Oaclo. 5l^A.. . D. The I.endoi h-.M-- a .Toitn.iM^ Vtr^r fllad f" record In thn Of flea of the Titles septenbor 13, 19J9 as Oocun.-nt Ho. 2038795 vov. t 11 Lots and Outlets In Sugar WnoOs. r. Quit CI.aU ccodo dated r:ept..<n» ot^ A 1 CCflco of t«>- M#np-pln County io i AC'pi>r- d l«»e?, as Oocumant M08.2038796 faa title to Outlets A. n, C and -j, ..l «.AU . NOW, TnonCreWE. th« Declaration is hor*.bV .. d-.d 1. Capitalised terns used VrnV.i*'--r and affect nc In tho Dec lar.at ion iin.ess the otherwina. ' <sl7 Afjo :-RinR TAXES P:i0 U!T Cf rwcft^h i«4 »is;i:rcEc*TT TRA.NL i f.9 FN^’C mEO SEP 21 1£m C Ufo^jtPiN COUNT* MiF.N. -----'/A-e^iT i. <» ♦ - # 4- ;■ t; L- 3.5 Property No. 4. Introducti^ “ This 45 acre grouping is currently under two ownerships with the majority of it zoned rural residential single faaily. Approximately 10 acres abutting Highway 12 are currently zoned B-1 residential business district. All but approxiaately 3 acres of this are under a single owner. Typical concerns for this property include access to Highway 12 and North Brown Road together with the concern for safety at the North Brown Road and Highway 12 intersection. Discussion of Alternatives •• Alternative No. 1 - Present Zoning If this property were to develop as it is currently guided and zoned, it would result in a narrow strip of comr.ercial uses along Highway 12. However, since these businesses will be restricted from direct access off Highway 12, some form of frontage road will need to be provided. If this area were to be served by a frontage road adjacent to Highway 12, it would represent an expensive solution to this problem since this road would only be developed on one side. Area 4 & 5 Fig. 30 . - -- r •*?; L -* % X *11 I Mtemative Wo. A Alternative 2 would allow for businesa/cotraercia 1 abutting Highway 12 to be served by a remote frontage road that would eventually extend over to willow Drive. The north side of this would provide for multi-residential with the bulk of the northern site developed at the uns.wered 2-acre residential. Connection of the single family to Pin. Ridge Lane is optional, and would be eliminated from consideration in exchange for frontage road between North Brown Road and Willow Drive. \ ^ C3" r ii fi I f A11 e r natlve__2Jo 3 - propgrty Owners Proposal - At the beginning of the process, the owner subaitted a scheae for d.velopaent of the property, which w.s subsegnently aaended by the owner during the process which provide, a. shown in Figure 32 for: A) A combination of land 2 acre single family lots on the north portion utilising municipal services. The two acre single family are used to buffer the 2 acre un.ewered lot. to the north and we#t. B) The southern portion does provide for a remote frontage from Brown Road west to the western edge of the property. -f"'/ / -T"~^------T*——;• U y I • t'“'1 V*. ii !T\'\ hi ! ? s. IfT y t SIDNEY REBERS ----- . Property Owner Proposal Fig. 32 A L -•,4 w..‘ RecocOTended Alternative - The recomnended alternative, which is includes a further extension of the limited/office cormnercial business district back from Highway 12, with a remote frontage road on the back portion of this district similar to figures 31 and 32. Prior to the development of the commercial portion of this property, the existing Intersection at Brown Road and Highway 12 shall be improved so that safety concerns associated with the current use and future increased use of this intersection are addressed. Configuration of the frontage road and North Brown Road would be determined at the time of development. Frontage road access to Highway 12 could either be opposite Brimhall Avenue in Long Lake, and/or on Willow Drive opposite the frontage road between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road. The property north of the commercial area would be single family with sewer and water planned for the area. With sewer and water services available to the property, the owner could submit a 1 and 2 acre mixed single family density alternatives for Council consideration. The maximum allowed density acceptable would not exceed that outline in the alternative 3, subject to utility availability, appropriate density, buffering, etc. The residential area would be served by a cul-de-sac or circular road off Brown Road with no connection to the west if the frontage road is installed. 1 r fA I *1f « If m ‘ I interceptor is the Maple Plain/Lon^ Lake interceptor, a force main that exists within corridor. As is noted on page 28, it is anticipated that this MWCC force main will not be utilized for service in the area, with some noted exceptions. This is in part based on the fact that Orono was in opposition to installation of the subject force main, and the fact that the operating capacity of the line, will probably allow for only 50 units for that section between Old Crystal Bay Road and the Long Lake pump station. The anticipated net increase in units for this area will be in the range of approximately 500 (600 total units in the Medina/Orono/Long Lake line, minus 116 units currently allocated to the City of Orono). It is anticipated that the net addition of 500 units will not be of significant impact either to the interceptor system discharging to the Blue Lake Treament Plant nor to the plant itself, given that this change would be while there are upgrades anticipated at the Blue Lake plant. f f & 3. TRANSPORTATION One of the primary goals during this study was that any altered development should be of a nature that would pay for improvements to the corridor. The primary improvements would be installation of frontage roads both to the north and south of Highway 12, together with improved intersection control, at least at the intersection of Willow Drive and Highway 12. The intent is to keep local east/west traffic off Highway 12 as much as practical, to provide local traffic with at least one more intermediate control point for crossing Highway 12 at Willow r -♦ r V \ Drive# and to limit direct access on to Highway 12. Additionally# by providing retail services and housing in close proximity to the existing arterial, transportation demands on other transportation corridors should be diminished. It is anticipated that the general transportation needs will be within existing capacity and that this development will not exacerbate existing problems with the system. It is anticipated that this development should pay for the local cost of improvement# at least the intersection control points together with payment of a substantial amount of the frontage road improvement (less any appropriate MSA funding for such roadt>). laia lnt«rTTwjiat« Artcrai • Mnar Artvtal Q Existing Sifful PropoMd Signal “ Propeaad Road (primary) S74 S0T 1064 Avaraga Oaly Tr|pa City of Orono HIGHWAY 12 CORPIDOR STUDY Western Portion Proposed Transportation System Fig. 35 4 ■4r* ► CAR WASH 5>ERVICL/DEUVERY OVER HEAD DOOR nl GARAGE OFRCE SHOWROOM 5 OVER HEAD GARAGE DOOR5> O LANDSCAPE ‘>CREENl^4G AREA 60* HDCP 1 5»IDEWALK 21 20 n 16 CURE> A^O GUTTER (TYPICAL) ~ 1 ! JO' O’ if I»s <■ n - KETAi)41NG WALL I •-J t J O CUKf^ CUT MCMTX SITE PLAN r-20' 08/25/94 rev 08/31/94 IIIJ t- tH u- ;V5r. . • 'O ■ :i.V •v; « U> r.S irii'i5Ml ■*'';fH p’ • • • tt f “ i V 5|f' ;•., ^ fi ‘ »ir > ;' 'H, p: ‘i ■ i « < • I ' ;UiM‘ ■*V;.’’; '•> y- WMP ’!. '■ r ' '. < . ■ i4h'’v ‘7i At - /. _ ■ !^ ^ ''■>A bRib £eeIs|=L. - n.y • ^ a ^ tt'?i iif ^e’r 5' •0 u i 7?4erflio*j 'n1»Vi B ■ N OU -HMe^ S3M9C S U lli Ti .#■ “ctTiT a 791 r C f." ^ n TrTiT"sm? Jgi/ .......^ f“ * 'd i. 9cr Ct'iii <• vO rVv u ;vr W II % w iSivr U ^ * •‘i’ltr; I ?; s 9 ‘ § 1 c£... -iX. nf* \v fc^° t;5 ~ 1 if/ii M /St 1 ! • iV» j.ci.ft*! Ail i 'i. •; ■>i(^ *Mn« MuT^Tv rv • lO iiC •' ti-c ‘N •:i. •i '.'.•ir.uk ' *» w - ro ........L .,.r I.-' ■4:S 1 ":;■ 'i- ■rfiS ':lf - '• ' ' 'L** •* . r' ' ■'Vhi IV- ' h •3 ./• ; C4 v:• /• _ ,//■<=) ;i- •ji Vi 5 h -TT- • I / A* iSr*T'i ■s liTi ^^1 RAY Wear Lane N. OLD flA t I-j. ‘ K . .i.I- 1 iilVtiici CMlii.I-'i-’ • ' I 1 t on^ loWe Cf .».( ■QflOWN i-rC I Countryside HACK Qoldan View 0^0(» Drive ; wllow .'■fir - vi' "I't L >' ENOM.E ABRlNfiTON mrwrton ■' $ .LAKE DuronT CHARLE? sf I ' • ' - I ■',»•' if 'i'i i;- , » f I V 1 II IE ’•.!. *' •' • orchard ? .y.&.-c i ‘i'll;"Hi ;;i 'fe m VIRGINIA AVE ■ ‘''sSiM ^1 ‘•"■'north mm VTIViI m ’‘/l BROWN w»» (//road I'^'WE '1 M tv. n A.fV W*wood Ri Knoll ;Monor r c: ft (OIiHC '^‘1 Pro ORDIMAKCE NONBEH «4, SECOSD SERIES ORDISANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO BY LISTING THE LEG^ DESCRIPTION OF A CERTAIN PROPERTY NITHIN THE CITY REIONED PROM RR-IB TO R-IA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS* Section 1. The nunicipal code of Orono Is hereby amended by amending the official zoning 'map and coning use district boundries for property legally described belov: That part of'a property located in the east half of the northwest quarter of Section 34, Township 118, Range 23, describees follows* That part lying north of a line LawnOTlTB^feet south of and parallel with the north line ©^““tTIe east half of the northwest quarter of Section 34. To be hereby rezoned from ^he RR-13 Rural Single Residential District to R~1A, Single Family Residentail Dist-iCw. Section 2. This ordinance shall be publ ished in the Laker/Pioneer newspaper and shall be effective upon publication. Adooted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of Octo er, 1988. James R. Grabek, ATTifsT: /bWothy M./Hallirf, City Clerk I ^9 '-h.V- U ts,(J L(J ov o s Mp>^ TO: FROM: DATE; Chair Schn«ter and Orooo Planning Commi’isk>n Members Ron Moorx, Cay Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building A Zoning Administrator October II. 1994 SUBJECT: #1977 l^awrence and Marilyn Dorr, 9SD Tonkawa Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB. Lakcsht>re residential re<|uiring 1 acre in area. I»ropeny consists of 74.600 s.f. or 1.7 acres. Ap|»lication: Applicants seek approval of an average lakcshore setback vari.«Kc to alUiw comtruetton of a new residence on the propeny that currently sustains a seasinul two slor>' cabin. The follovsing ordinances are pertinent for this review; .Section 10.22. Subd. I (B) - Average lakeslH>re setback vatiaiKC. Proposrdl structure will encroach 97‘ in front of the average t.ikeshore setback line. Sccuon 10.22. Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover. 75*250' setback area =* 22.900 s.f. Allowed = 5.725 s.t. Propo.seJ — 5,725 s.l. or 23% No variances required. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Review of strucTural coverage. Allowed *= 7,190 s.f. or 15% Proposed = 3,303 s.f. or 4.4%. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Existing Survey F - Proposed Survey G - Map Locating Areas of Cross Section H • AB Cross Section I - CD Cross Section Jl-4 -Hardcover Fact Sheets K - Elevations L - Floor Plans Zomi^ Fik #1977 October II. 1994 Page 2 M • Hoffman letter 10 7/94 N - HcHise l»rofik O - Second I^vel I kx)r Plan - Pviteraul Guest Apanmera p . gpora Dr^ripfion of Request Af^licants propose O k construction of a ne\s year nnind residence to be placed behiinl the front line of the exhtintt s- msoim I cabin extending to the det4iK:hed garage to the west of the seast^nal cabin. Smrcnirc has been kvated on tlK property in an attempt to minimize excavations of steeper elevations to the west resulting in the loss of several mature trees. Review Exhibit F. reiic structure will he located out of the bluff impact zoik and 75 ’ lakcshorc setback area Structure w ill be approximately 93 ’ from the 929.4 elevation at the sin&'turc’s closest projection to the lake. Gaffron completed an analysis of the topv>graphy of the area to determine the presence of blutls (E.xhibils G, H aiKl I). Staff has also revkwed this information with Ceil Strauss of the DNR She concurs that the only bluff area on this property is the bank immediately adjacent to the shoreline. She confirms ufxm review of the staffs analysis information that steeper elevations to the west wxnild not be part of a bluff but area is subject to the special controls dealing w ith deveUipment within sleep slopes. Review Exhibit N, note the peak height of the structure will be 30’ above exi.sting grade at approximately the 955 elevation. The grade level of house to the south is at the 980 elevation. Review Exhibit M, the neighKiring property owner to the south voices major coiKem with the new home being placed within the prc,sent footprint advising that the current seasonal structuo: at a 19-20’ peak height blocks certain views of the lake. They ask that the house be placed at the average lakeshore setback line so as to minimize any impact upon their views of the lake. Note that homes recently constructed within the immediaic neighborluHxl were all obliged to meet the average lakcshorc setback line. They prefer that the proposed residence on the lot to the immediate north also be required to meet the average lakeshore setback line. The neighbor asks that since they are unable to attend the meeting on the 17ih that you table all action on the proposal if the structure is not to meet the average lakeshore setback requirement. Review Exhibit O. the second level floor plan reveals a potential guest apartment over the uaracc. Allhouch the area adjacent to the sitting area is labeled wet bar and not kitchen (no sign of cooking surface), applicants should advised of future use to determine if a conditional use permit vvill be necessary. The only access to area is via the second lloor exercise room. Zoning Fik #1977 October II, 1994 Page 3 Option? of Acfioii Available to Applicants A If applicants choose to place the hcHisc at the avcrace bicshorc setback line, the applicants need not proceed uith the variance review as the only variance required for this proposal is the average lakeshore s:tback; or If applicants feel they can work with the owner to the south in an anempt to minimi/e the v isual impact of the structure, Plaiming Commission may vote to tabic the application until the Hoffmans can be present at the November meeting of the Planning Commission. ch 141/ CITY OK ORONO - VARIANCE APH.ICATloa^ Inilial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (iK3 change from original application) Variance for noo-coitforming stnicnircs $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) if 7/‘i rr^v TS It * •' V} fc. t- T r r t r* .-.-'-. W ‘»\ua w ». V •> % v'v vv V- 4 r, . ..•» • ’ w ^ V \ • V«»ik . \k.t ^%,t\ r'OL.' dfc , Y . . . “l . i 4 “ . • ** • V Wkr V'4 Ava r 4 PROPERTY' 1NKOR.MATION Site Addreu 990 tonkawa road A, V Prc^rt>’ Idemificaiion Number (P.I.D.) 38 08-117-23-12 0001 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Propern Acquired 8.89 ----------------------_(montfiNear) I (do) (do not) also own the adjaccm parcels of land. Present use of property ’: XX residential ___other (specify) Zoning District:_______L8~_1B _____. . ----------------------- APPLICANT Name LAWRENCE 4 .MARILYN DORR Phone (home) 818-952-1281 Phone(wcrk)_____________ Address: ^335 MOOD LEIGH LA.NE Citv: LA CANADA Zip: 9I0II OW'NER (if different than applicant) Name (SAHE AS ABOVE) FLINTRIDOE, CA Phonahome)__ Phone (work)___ Address:Cits-:Zip: Dt:SCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:___ F.siiraatcdCoastutetionCost $ 300,000.00 SEE ATTACHED (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear XX Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF L2SUSU.AL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:-------------------------------------------------------— SEE ATTACHED (attach additional sheets if necessary) required submittals . n nf the in formation mujL^bmittedtohe application deadline jiatejnnrjifr 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. - Br;. ri! rT^i^rapSc suney (existing «td proposed elevationsUf any changes m existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S',‘ x U tor reproduction stVeiches or plans of noor & elevation views (provide one tl) copy 8 n x 11 ). Sst o^dt^ legar.4nes (delude manul status) of all persons with an mterest m the r owiv TOs would include nainets) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). ^iSdeSl to this application, please attach a separate list ot any other persons vou wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City sta . Tha Vnniicant and Propertv Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yaur information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowle g Applicant’s Signature Date OWT^ER’S SIGNATURE mnlication and furtlier authorizes reasonable The owner hereby /gents. Conunissioii members, and CouncU entry onto the property by CJ^sntt, consuKan , g reauestmembers for purpose^q^i^igationa^v^tication oft q ' , Owner ’s Signaturi jjs* »—SSE to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise me buu this change prior to the meeting. 8 • . V ■r* ^ • t (• ih# .r’. m. nc*># w 7T -.1 ii /a PROPOSED MiVV RESIDENCE FOR DR. LAWRENCE D. & MARILYN A. DORR 980 TONKAWA ROAD ORONO. MINNESOTA addendum to VARIANCE APPLICATION SUPPORTING NARR\TI\ E Requested is a permitted \’ariancc to the average lakeshorc setback This proposal involves removing the existing house on the property and constructing a new home in the same approximate IcKation The new structure will be no closer to the lake than the existing building with the approximate closest distance to the lake being 93’ feet at the northwest corner of the house. The lot rises approximately 25 ’ above the lake to a plateau on which the existing house now sits and on which the new house is proposed to be built. From that point the lot steeply rises away from the lake The difficulty, then, in locating a house on this lot stems from the steeply sloping grades in areas other than the existing building site. For this reason the Owners respectfully request approval to rebuild their new home in the present location of the existing house r fARTEifflOOl m_mi <33- ^ 1 I*t 4t rr*. k' i * ■*ri. U7) , \>t 'h •. \% \ 'V I ^ r: » X V ‘# lkii*«' ?'•[ v!L\ :*. IC^ '% iii •sdv.’ilL (15) PI e» ir I? .(') C • i^ •- \.(5) (iil • >V'> (?) ■,.■« r« 1 ^ -\ CL :s 3<*. 47 1\>— il4) t^‘3 (I’s) V ^v»i*n** i \4»a* O iC* » * 5 C5 'V ,. <J ?.* I/. ;t iC" 25 > ID’ >3 ( 13) u {V i^Lisise©..T" Vr f‘5f f *15.25 ^-o't i.V' »' C*ST Wf se. jr «f .'N.V>"(1) 1 (19) re Jk. COT e 20 V <1 'Ik•n r ■ ♦ «» • - # V ^. »f**t Of Ifff T .•■ (<) WN UTC 97/Zfi/^i ■ *MTC« 010«. imoo AoooiOMCll NAMI •.TAXFAYfH - MAIC/AOOOw ,- V .•ji t -^ omr umOM€R Mil€ TA)9AYfR HAHE/AOORi:‘M 0i-117*n 11 0001OOfOO TONKAM WL 0 OOM/n A om nUSTf IS lAMOfNCf a mORVH oom Alls MOOOlEt«» flimniKSltACAMAOA CA flOil; OMCR HAHE 'ftlAXPAYER ? NAMC/AOOfl'i'• -in so 00-117-lS 17 01000 rONKHIA »0 J NOrmAN ETAt RAYraND J Rormifi 1000 TtROCAMA RO LQNB LAM m 55S5ASO 00-117-7S 71 ooia 00S05 TONKAMA RO 6AMIEL E jaoOOUR OAORIEL E JAOOOUR 71 UKIVERSITY AVf N E MRtS 104 55A1S It'-. :.« ■ - 4 itpv t , r,* T ‘ f ‘V > ¥ ' wti’ J-v ii‘» ‘ v't it wo»K9in cttJNTY p«o»cirrv twrawwTiow STStri* PKSKirV OtCIS LISTM II fMtOOin TVKAMA n B « H BOOTM OAVtO « HUILVH BOrra 970 rumnuk nLONQ LAM MN SSIS*SB C8-lir-IS IS 0019 #1010 TONRAH* RO DOUGLAS J MILLIWS DOUGLAS J MILLIANS 1010 TCBCANA RO LONG LAAt m SSSS4SB BB-117-IS I« OOei OlOlS TONUBM RO DANIEL C A RUTH H RARTTN DANIEL C ■ RLNH H RARTEN lOlS TOM(AMA RO LONG LAM m B5S5A KROBT NO. RX4SSR01 ■» t.SB oB-iir-n u 0003•ORRO TERNAMA ROH C I L J COWLIXB MULIAN C CORNELIUS LORI J CORMLIUS no TONRAMA RO ORONO EM S5SSBSB BB-117-IS II BBISBOOTS TOnrUfA RDR J EARAS A n K TAVfDSIAAMnOHy J TARASR7S TOMtAMA ROLONS LAAE m 5535ATOTAL BATCH 019 9999B I CERTITY THAT THE TACTS RfRRESENTEO ARE AN ACCINATE AND TRUE RERRESENTATION OT INTUOUTION AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE OH THl RECORDS OF THE HErBRPIN COUNTY DERARTHENT OT RRORERTY TAXATION. TO TM BEST OT MY RNOMLEOSE AND BELIEF fUZi JE%%! i4 \% 'tJ'-V •r! - nii’: ^omLAWRENCE DORRQC^mmmmr ioi t uttiom •-m-ncoum^ys >^ ^ . >>-'* ^ V •*> V ;V,' • 'v J vV’ V\. .-^s' V^ a :: , \^r=n i > mmmw mmm^^rn ____ __ _ A mmmm^i^m at M %a« >» »««nh • o«fi (• a ■v'm », —T iMM,*" ' "■ -■ •■-------------•...•* Mm>*mrnm m LM-ri (i:)|}l\ iiCRl^gLRL^lNi M t4 /± tmn »«ND /"♦ #•'<• > 9a n*4t) <#«tTMa 1 U&iAiai ■'''^L ------------------%— - . — ^ -r* *-.- *^- - ~r^ --^ I»!.:»^xl r ^ /\v/€S («if V ' > s ^ • I * «2.of^e ^BVCt ^ gC n«11TI fl AfttOClATta I’A icmncT*D O D C C K ^ I D t N C E ODpKO. ?«!!»»E30tA >«•-% X ■ ^ m ■ m ^ • w • • • I T—t ». ^ r--;—--|y-l—*—T-* • •"T'1 r fI • » •t j : t »« rnm» • • • • tS. ,^----------'^; ^*1 5^ ' VH ■ • ■* ' r* *> •. - ■ • -r.- *-i ;r r I • « *\ HA.RDCO^'ES aiCULATIOM HORXSHtET ?• SCraACK ZONE;(ci«as ONE) CO^ 75-250' 25:-!:C0’ 500-ICC<!' Existing Hardcover in Zone •• A.House • X • IB l.f. LENGTH WIDTH X «S.F. •• ^ X S.F. m - X , . S.F. X S.F. s«Garage ____ X ^ ._________ l.F. C.Dr 1 VEWAY _______ X •S.F. X . S.F. 0. # • Sidewalk • X m • S.F. X _ - S.F. X m ........... S.F. E.^ATIO/ 3eck X » . • S.F. • F.Landscape m X • _ S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY m X - S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • m S.F. X m S.F. G. OTHEr Total nAr.CuOVER in Zone Total Property Area in Zone S.F. S.F. B X 100 ^SOO t S.F. o B \ rf' oyXo SEP 2 7 1994 r 2 7 / A y-* A ^ ^m f ^ ^ - - ka5::dv£3 c.;LCL'L;no« korksheet sSTiACK 2CNE. Cc:-.:.c cne) C-75' (^-2503 25:*5C0' 500-1000' Existing Haroccves in Zons f a f % A. Houis 2 ?l5r LENGTH WIDTH s.r. S.P. S.E. S.F, B. Oarage X __- 214 c. D riveway X ____» /?0C X ^4t0^^r Jr^00 D. Sidewalk X _ ^j*r * . X . - 22 X s E. Patio / D eck • ., X - • - S/(P i • • f.Uvndscape ____X _ ” _ _ 3 AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . „^ X ^• « P'^STIC sheeting X . - .....-.................. 5 S.F. S.^. S.R. S.F. I.e. S.F. G. Other X X S.F, S.F. Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ^ s.p, A 4 ' 22. ?^g_ ^ ,.p. B ^72 5 4 B 2 2. X 100 2S.OO % SEP 2 7 1994 r •a HARDCO^/ER CALCULATION KORKSHEET SST0ACK ZONE: (CIRCLE CNE) E xisting Hardcover in Zone C--75' 75*250' (250-500) 5(K)-!OOG' »* A. • Wntf^P X ____ » S.F. length WIDTH • X S.F. X • _ _ S.F. m X ■ S.F. X - S.F. B • c. n A D A 3 X - S.F. H d r \ycwA V X - 24oP S.F. • X « ■ S.F. D., • • ^ r nPWAfi \t X « S.F. X • « ■ S.F. X » S.F. E.^ATIO/ 3eck X • » . ■ __ S.F. . • e 1AMn^CAP^X - S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN nv X S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X « e S.F. X » S.F. • G. Other X . » S • F • Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone 2 400 S • F • 2C OOP t s.f.B :T' Z4i>o__-^2 Cjooo X 100 -Yo SEP 2 7 1994 m . m •-•• • • *• mflf i I HARDCCr/ER CALCUmTIOd WORKSHEET _____ 5-.TBACK ione: (c;=cl5 e«) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' (sOO-imj) r 'c 4 • 7v A.Hnii<:F X OB S.F. LEiMGTH m width • • X S.F. X » % S.F. » •X S.F. X S.F. B. C. ^APAT?? ...r...... X ... S.F. Hd * T vrwAY X /20a S.F. X 4 S.F. D.. ' • '^inpwii K X S.F. X •....- S.F. X 91 S.F. e.^ATIO/ D eck „„ ^W .S.F. • X S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN av X S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING X • n • S.F. . X s S.F. n. Other X «a '•S.F. Total H ardcover in Zone Total PROPSRr^ A rea in Zotie /zoo ^ C*ji • r • /^oo ^B /C,'4oo X IQO 4^00 - S.F. 7. 32 B o/ . To 3l'af (Smt.SEP 2 T . 9 • • •• • ^-1. *• w r'i———Ttrt.\-rj^JL MrV^ ^r^i oii SES • ^I'T- • • r 4H ■^■irry’ ■ •• • -1 • • V ] cil\'aTW>ki / rC* »4opkl H WiC-^t ^r. mmtm • ^ ^ • \S£^ ijpwil^ b O R R ;: R1T1 P rtc^ o COHO; M-i * «i e A o T \ V ■ • cf V .,.*.•rnn^ nTT> IPK lUilll i OSJ,y-CLK-.c, v< g<^>«^rTT <* f^‘.^CKr- ca A^ct>‘'rc-T^. I WUTV4 l>^T KULVAT^i j" *•.*. . /#* « r -»* ^ >■< ■ X.KTTTXL—r*r^ ..WIF .-..v^.-. -• —••• - • #% *TT!l DOCD C EVIDENCE ODOIO. NlKME(SOT\ ••• I . * • • :• •• •*. V/ I f^A. APs^HITcC^r^ ••. \ . ^<ia a#***^^. .* •Mi» w ^ • <».*•» 9. *>■■ Ail— 1\\ Octc^«r 7, I99'a • 2. 3. Or OHO Flamiiv Corriissior Be; Public Hearing, Ortcbcr 17, 19^ 7. *19^7, ?80 Tor.icawa Read Chair and Other >!«r.ters cf the Plannir^ CcnrJaaicr: >jr na^es art Rayt.cnd J» are Retb aJe are o ’yner/rtsi -ts of the i-rcrert/ on tne south side of the proncsed building sit-.. Since June 1^, 1>67, or a little ertr twer.tr-scren (27) years, it baa ijten here. We wcula ask the Conr.ittee to a? ny the reouest for an arerage lakeahore setbacx rariance for the follovrir.g rtarona: T The prorosed structure wculu result in a Jag Ln the ILne of existing hor.es by harinf; a structure standing in the niddle of the landscape flow. The proposed structure would obstruct our view of t e lake. There is lots cf rcor. on the lot to nc»e it back ao as to be In cor.pliance with the site line ordinance. The hone to the north cf the proposed site and the here Just s-iuth of our site were able to ovcrcone steep sloping grades to ccr.rly with the ordinance. The owner of the -rorerty Just south of us requested a site line variance for stnilar reasons that was denied in l'?S?. The owner subseq-icrtl ' built a htr-e in cornliar.ee with the ordinance and has a ho-e fitted in tre lot enhanerng the jea”.tv oi the .-jrta instead cf c.e:troyir.g it. c. The present o'-.T.ers of *■''■€ nrorcted rrorerty are not ful]-ti;.e residents of ''irunes-ta and since the rurchase of the rrorerty have snent two to three weeks each year on the proi.'erty. If that is their intention for the future, it would seer, unreasonable to grant a variance to a two to three week resident that would affect the beauty ana enJcuT.ent of the pemanent res 'dents. 6. For the reasons statec, we believe that the value of our property and neighboring properties also woulu be reduced if a variance granted. Being out of town tr.e weex cf October 17 and un.ablo to attend the .reetir.g in person, we hope this letter will state our concerns clearly and, if not, we woulc ask the Conr.ittee to table this until their next reeting. ii. Sincerely, '7 Ra^Tiond J. HoTfir.an Ruth !•!. Korfnan 1000 Tenkawa Road Long Like, Xinj-fsota 55356 :?<; ^{.'= • . •. t * V ■•'» “?•■ .--• . • t •' !.. 'Iv'i i.. I t ! i-:.( a isi^ r. . ^ wiT.»5, :"■ '..f ■0Mm f PM V -j| B't'*'. '\J' tl S • . • ■(..:!- ■ : ''''ii; ;; ' Mm '=' 4(tli vm te;v^W.-r. ,; \ I 1 r * • • I. ->1' % V i.' 5 ‘t’' ^ ■11' ■ ;‘ V'iI t. ^ • :n f ■' V. 5 F- mmmmm I -:/f? ’ 4C^V -- V... r. . . \ .-V* ,*r ’ i V^''; .1 * ‘i ; *. •.•*'; .•*/ ■ ■?•* V* * ' . : '- 'T f'i/A'- ' •- vc:-^ ':»• '-S vJ-"-’caV^ •• : ' ‘’f -.*lpm:-C-li f. i I . >‘. # '. V • >. »i . . . V'i **' 'V* *^^ *‘*^ .» *v .ViiVv : .•!*« r.-: i-/i-.„ ; vrA'* •'”/?•>■ P. ; < ' c^.^?-'?’:'''!"'C,' -'^'?';' ,=:"*’;£ iiiili • ^ ■ •• * ■*" •‘^'. • I. • -.■•;• •. ;.: P j:}: •■ . . •.•■' ■ t * • • ‘ *► ;. ■- , (* * 5!»^ .f . v!v;.?,V'.<: ; i|‘ - ■'■" ■'..■■,' ■ ^^•■ •< ’ V'l . .*' •'A-*. ..•5'4 i *‘r *Vl » *• < ^ ^ • * ■ v’ ♦ 0-1 ‘rrus, -•: ~'i* ^ ‘ ' '. . ■ *■■• * •*^'^v.-,*•'''iv*,*‘-'-i -■ V’ ' - ■ ■■■■■’ .- 1 '! ■ V.. ■ ■< r\‘;v';;.,'- . .1 , *•% ■4**‘- Bsa k ‘>; V*' I?:* rl "; r*', * -- ., * ♦' , • •* ‘".m Mm I '^mum t£»3 »i«:„ ,,» ~ Vi'''•' '-I **?^ J • . tlf ' ■:}> ■ v:>& 5 j-<V t« .*v * T. ' 4v I • ., 'I •4 .w^- 'W w|R« i!«'t'WAI.;k V: ^ ’ 1 ,|8SSI^ ■'fMi/f ■; -?'{! ,k J v: c;?; ?ft . i‘r'v.r.fe; ’• >/v; *• ■ » ‘ ;;.,V,:«ii:; • •■ • W •» / *..’•. •' -V'^ ‘ilKYL'M : ' * .-'I ^ ; ir <\ ' i. ' r * ■'«{■• hW*.* >r. r 9 October 13. 1994 Orono Planning Commission Re; Public Hearing. October 17. 1994 7. #1977, >80 Tonkawa Road Chair and Other Members of the Planning ConTmission: Wc ire ihe neighbor* to the north at #970 of the pro^sed new home to be built to the south of us. #980. «« tire Divio ana . im and we have moved into our new home in Decembci. 19 3 purchased from the builder. Dick Lauer. We have seen the plans of the new home for the Dorrs. We an. very happy and excited about having a new home next to us^ ”* understand that the McCulleys will continue to live in '!« Dom ne home during the summer months. Mr. McCulley has iiitormed us that the Dorrs will be spending more time at the lake and are looking ahead to retirement here. We have recently been informed of n letter of objection to the proposed new building at 980 Tonkawa. A variance has been requested by the Dorrs to place structure on the same site as the existing 90 feet variance is refused, the house site will be moved back over 90 feet. This will result in the destruction of the ,^5 mature trees and the necessity to cut into a steep chff removal of a great amount of soil and mature plantings. Visually, die existing house site is not this lake area follow the shoreline as will the new additional view will be obstructed nor lakeshore area achanged tf this variance is granted. / To: Date: Orofw PUiming CominiNsk>n Mcmhers Ma>tjr Callaian and Count'ilmemhen Ron Moone. City /Umuurfrilor Jkanne A. Mabusth. Building A Zoning: AdminiMraKH- Ocu^r 13. 19^ Subject: #1978 Wcsionka iMencrnkwi IViject, 23SO Shadyuotxl Ro^ - Sketch Plan Zoning District: LR-IC Application: Applicant lus filed a sketch plan appikaiion requesting a zoning aitK-ndment that would allow a rcskkntul shelter for battered women and ihcir children Oono’s single family residential zoning ikxs not permit such use nor docs its commercial zones If the Planning Cmnmission supports the request to amend the zoning axle, siatt will present Planning Commission's findings to the Council as Council must first direct the Planning Commission and staff to proceed with a zoning anwndmenl. List of Exhibits A B C l> U F G II I J K L M N O P Q T Appikaiion Addendum Description of Operation Proposal Mission Statement Construction Statement Applkatton - Minnesota Nonprofit Assistance Fund Application - Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Memo. Craig Anderson. Chief of Police St. Bonifacius & Minnetrista Kurt trickson. Orono Police IX*panment, Memo 10/10 94 Site Plan Floor Plan Plymouth Zoning Code Section - Residential Facilities Minnetonka Zoning Ctxle Section - Residential Care Facilities for More than 6 Persons Mound Ctxle Section ami Proptised Amendment John G. Fischer Letter 9/28/94 Sojourner Fetter 9/15/94 Sandy Schultz. St. John's WFLCA. 2 Letters Lixalion Map Zoning iKjundary Map Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.25 - FR-lC zoning district Zoning File f 1978 (X'tot«r 13, Pase 2 Review of Application Westtmka Intcrvcmioii Project » a community hascJ iK>n pfv^Iit organizatmn o! 14 trained volumem that li\c in the local ct>mnnmity WeMonka servci approximately I 4 ot the I a V c Minnetonka commumn,. Wcsionka Intervention Project. Inc. was started under the guidance and inicrcsts of memhers of the local pv>lice. clergy, socul scrvKc workers and sclnxd district leaders and has been in existence for approxintately 5 years. Review Exhibits K and S. Westonka proposes to consert the existing Grace Baptist Church building kKated in Navarre at the comer of County Roads 15 and 19 to a shelter toT victims of domestic abuse. Based on the proposal. Exhibit 1). the shelter would house up to .0 victims including their families. R cvkw Exhibit I. The flcxir plans reveal only o assigiK-d sleepimt r.x^ms on the lower level On ime of the grant applications it sIrva , a rsMential o 9 sleepini rcnims. Applicant should be asked to verify number of restdents. Tlie average stay tor a victim at the shelter is 17 davs. The shelter will also provide a meeting place tor family and individual couaseling and gr.xjp therapy sessions. We arc advised that there are 14 trained volunteers but it is not clear how large the administrative staff will be. Review Exhibits S and I. The property is surrounded to the east and north by single family residential use and to the south and west by commercial uses. Staff is aware of two successful facilities within the cities of Plymouth and Minnetonka. The one in Plymouth is called Home Free Shelter and located on the nonh shore ot Medicira: Uke. The facility is able to house 30 residents. 1 he shelter is part ot a complex ot other socta service faciliues located on a fomier religious school campus within a single family residential zone Review Exhibit M. the Plymouth zoning code sections that allow resid'mcc tacilities under a condmonal u^e pem.it. The lomns staff .idvised that the ct.de was spccihcally amended lor this fadluy. Review Section 7, Subd. C. the lactlitv had to he in c.xistence as of Novemher -0. 1989. The Minnetonka facility kn«iwn as Sojourner was permitted under a CUP and can serve up to 16 residents. It is k>cated within a single family residential neighborhood. At the t.me the proposal was being reviewed, the neighborhofxi was m strong opposition to the Now there is no opposition and it seems to have blended in with the surrounding single tami^ residential neighborhood located on a cul-de-sac. Review Exhibit M. Minnetonka developc^ several standards for such facilities. If the Orono code is to be amended, any one of these could be considered for inclusion for a conditional u,sc pcnnil. The Wccto.ka li.iervemion Frojcci had a proposal before the Mound Planning Commission and Council ,n the spring of 1904. Th..-y were hoping * commercial area in downtown Mound adjacent lo a single lamily tesrdenttal /onrnc discussrorei with the Mound staff, they advised that they had s.tn.lar repons fmm r Zomnp Flic #1978 CXipber 13. 19^4 Pa^ 3 prolessionals involved in domestic violence and police rcpons trom the v^inoos cities noting tew probknw, if any The appiicatK« moved from its Plamung CtMnmissKm to the Council It was at Council when residents from the adjacent neighbivfhoods voiced loud and strong ignition to the proposed use bringing forth documeiKatwo that cvwylctcly contrad^ted rcpt>ns of the contnhjlinf muiucipal sulfs and professKwIs Please review Fxhibit J. Kurt I-rK'ks^m \ rep^>f1 commenting on the local police interactions with the facilities at Pl>nKHith and Minnetonka Erickson ’s report also notes minor aHicems such as the Minnetonka facility which has tralTic problems on the cul-dc-sac. None reps^-neu any :nckknis u iih the i^ration of the facility within the communities. The application has been accepted as a sketch plan so that bsMh staff and Planning Commission ciHild become familiar with a domestic abuse facility in a calm, infoimative environment But irregardless of the need for such a facility in hsHli the immediate community and West Hennepin commimiiy - is the pr»>p»>sed lixation within the single family residential zone compatible? Conforming within the LR-IC single family zoning district? Please consider the following criteria; 1. General localUin - hub of Lake Minnetonka. U>cation wi'hin West Hennepin service district. 2. 3. 4. Local/ncighborlKHxl immediately adjacent to commercial district amJ bus service Coniigutms to an established neighborhood with smaller developed lots. Size of property - adequate distaiKC from facility to adjacent single family residences. Is ilKrrc an adequate buffer zone to shield adjacent residential neichborhood? 5.Will the facility impact kval infrastruemre - greater demands on sewer, water streets, police, etc. 6. 7. Potential for diminution in surrounding property values Would the use be compatible in all single family residential zones? Should the amendment include a rezuning to commercial? 3.Would the proposed use located in the Navarre area be in contlict with Orono ’s CMP? Review public service plan of CMP, specitically 9-3 Services, Police Services, Health Care Services. 9. Other criteria suggested by Planning Commission. r Zofuof File October 13. I«m Page 4 QucMkms rdalcd to specific use 1 Tout raimbcT of <taff * include volunteers and paid stalf * 2.How many cliciws attend gnxip couaseiiag ses^idons? How oticn arc tlKSC conducted a meek? What kind of a facility do they currently have m the City of MiHintr.* What facilities do they currently refer vitt ms to* 5. Arc there reskfcnce facioties of 6 or levs Vk iihin the West Hennepin district.* 6.The final directive to Westonka Intenention at the Mound rcviess was to seek a location in the more rural areas of the sen^e distrkt away from older, hither density residential neighborhoods. Wliat is applicant’s response* Staff plans to take photographs of the residential facilities and surrounding neighhorlK^s in both Minnetonka and IMymouth. Photographs will he presented at your meeting on the I7ih. #1 r '-24J is city of ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APFfTe\TION Type of AppllC^llOfl to be Filed________J SumbcT (PA D.) ^ ^ T • * .-i-V l^ T/7p^ TTTT- applicant , Address 5*Z Pheme (lK?me) ^ ^ Ptionc (^X5fk)_ *> - -» it>'Zip 0\V?^ER (if different than applicanl) Name ______________ Phooe (home) Phone (work) Address Cit\Txv. Date Property Acquired___ I (do) (do r»i) also own the adjacrtrt'parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ______ $250.00 Commercial Inductrial Use $2(X).(X) Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling * 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall. reDining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _____After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee ^^^ty;^*4,-.,^^onth year^ . TT.- ■•’i'C'”*> ; V- i S V k V* i w £ V' A Wi. 1 1 ^ vy» TV V* YV •». w- V' • V V V »*«■ WVVi *^va fVV» 09 OTHER APPLICATIONS S2(X).00 Commercial Site Plan Review (-r consultant fees) _____$250.(X) Vacation _____$175.00 Fasement Vacation S 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule II oc . OO PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoninc District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify') 1. 4^* 3. 4. 6. 7. 9. 10. REQLIRED SlBMirrALS Completed Application Form. ' Describe request in deuU. r ------ Certified Propcrt> 0*T»rs List of o^TJcrs within 350 ’ (you can obtain this list trom ------Hennepin County Depanment of Finance, A-603. Govemment Center, 34S-3271). Plat Map. —” Certificate of Suney (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for sur^ey infennatioa. . Attach lesal description to application if noi included on required survey. -----“ Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations invohe ~ changes in elevation (grades). . List of the legal names (include manul satus) of all persons w ith an mlcrest in me ------ property This would include nam.c(s) of applicant(s) if not cunent owT.er(s). Consmlction plan, if applicable (sec staff for requirements) ------ As an addendum to this application, please arach a separate list of any other persons " von wish notilied of this application. SUBM^D. (Suff wiil require lo Kile driwings of ill documeuis. plins. et... to e submitted.) The Applicim ird Properly Owner must sign diis ipplicitton. Pleise remember thit your appliciLn is not complete if the above infomiation has not been induced. Certification by Clerical Department that Und Uk ApplicMon is complete. Initials ofClcrical Staff: ---------------------—----------- ~ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE infomatiou required or requested by the Zoni.ng The applicant hereby agrees time not covered by original fee payment) .Administrator, agrees to pay additional and cenifies that the information and'or unusual e.xpenses incurred in review or mis applicauon. and oemties mat supplied is true and correct.to.the best of hi^hcrjmowkdge. / ^ . Date Applicant s signature----- to dn^aoplicauon and further aulhonzed reasonable The owner hereby acknowledges „ members, and CouncU entry onto the ptopeny by City stalf. consulianrt. agenB. comm members for purposes qfJ^estigaimnand.>erinwnon Z'" /Owner’s signamrc Date hefore the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices Jt a> Anrlicants must be present at all scheduled CommissioD Meetings arc held on the third Momky o unable to anend a scheduled meeting, review meetings of the Planning Commission and Counci . and advise the Building &l Z ning Office please make arrangements to have an authorized agent atten m of this change pnor to the meeting. '^l/estoiifca ^iiteKi/entioii ‘T^/tojcci \ September 20. 1994 Dns Planmng Commission Cit> of OroiK) Post Office Box 66 CrxstalBav.MN 55323-0066 Dear Members: our ing rung tiled mg, ffice Westonka Intervention Project, Inc has been In existence for over ten years \S e have served the needs of those victims of domestic violence as best we can with the limited resources we have During the entire time of our organization and the himdreds of victims serv ed the one thing we have not been able to accomplish, yet we believe to be the most important part of the rebuilding process, is to He able to safely house those victims and thdr children in a shelter With the availability of a sheltei we can hopefully break that cycle of v iolence and start the healing process and help them rebuild and once again become productive members ot our community. .As vou are aware we did have an opportunity for a snelter in Mound We had been given the consent from Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church and wanted to mos •' that structure to the comer of Three Points Blvd and Co Rd 110, For a variety of reasons ihat project did tail We now have an opportunity for a shelter in your city and feel that it's location w^iuld not only serve the victims and their children better but its central location is ideal for a num - r ot reasons. The location I am talking about Is the Grace Baptist Church at 2380 Shadywood Road right on the comer of County Roads 15 and 19, the veiy hub and heart of the Lake Minnetonka Community. 472-2141 • PO BOX 34 • MOUND. 55364 QA/cstonlea .^nte/ti’ention ^/lOject 77 rr»» (: -. " r:\.; V -..' .i V X.; .- •» • JtSeptember 20, 1994 Planning Commission City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crvsial Bav, MN 55323-0066 Dear Members; Westonka lnter\cntion Project, Inc has been in existence for over ten years. We have ser\ ed the needs of those victims of domestic violence as best we can w ith the limited resources w e have. During the entire time of our organization and the hundreds of victims serv ed the one thing w e have not been able to accomplish, yet we believe to be the most impoaani part of the rebuilding process, is to he able to safely house those victims and their children in a shelter With the availability of a shelter we can hopefully break that cycle of violence and start the healing process and help them rebuild and once again become productive members of our community. As you are aware we did have an opportunity for a shelter in Mound. We had been given the con\ ent from Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church and wanted to mo\x that structure to the corner of Three Points Blvd and Co Rd 110 For a variety of reasons that project did fail We now' have an opportunity for a shelter in your city and feel that it's location would not only serve the victims and their childre. better but its central location is ideal for a numtcf of reasons. The location I am talking about is the Grace Baptist Church at 2380 Shadywood Road right on the comer of County Roads 15 and 19, the ver>' hub and heart of the Lake Minnetonka Community. 472-2141 • PO 00X34 • MOUND, MINNESOTA 5'j 364 1 We do ha\'e a purchase agreement with the church w hich is of course contingent upon the City of Orono's approval of the site with any necessar> zoning changes that may be required for it's operation and also on obtaining the necessary financing for it's ongoing operation For your information we have a complete budget approved w ith the Minnesota Depariment of Corrections and Human Services that will not only provide it's daily operations but will provide all the necessary moneys to maintain it's long term financial needs We also have applications submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for a Loaa'^Grant program for shelters for domestic abuse and to Minnesota Non-Profit Assistance Fund for a loan to help in the purchase and rehabilifdfi tn of the church. John Fischer of Professional Fund Raisers. Inc. is also assisting us in trying to obtain a Grant from the McKnight Foundation Included in the packet of information first of all our proposal, letters of support from the various shelters, agencies, and police departments that w ork with us in the field of domestic abuse A Description ana Mission Statement of Westonka Intervention Project, our 501 C Tax Exempt Status, the approval for our budget from the Minnesota Department of Corrections, a copy ot the proposal from BTK Inc and sworn construction statement as to what mav be necessary to rehabilitate the structure, copies of the two applications already submitted for additional financial assistance and a letter fiom Mr John Fischer I do hope this information will be helpful in the process of making everyone aware of the desperate need for a shelter in our community As in other communities around the State of Minnesota, the endorsement of this facility w ill ultimately be a tremendous asset to the City of 472-2141 • POBOX34 • MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 QAiestonfea S^^teinJedlon ^/lOject \'P Ofono because il truly will ser\ e her citizens as well as tht^se in her neighboring cities Thank you for the opportunity of being able to present this proposal. Sincerely yours. Valerie J Hessburg, Executi\-e Director 472-2141 • PO BOX 34 •MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 ______Ti QyUcstonfea ^nte/ti/ention ^/loject (t. >L <i->4 - #6 DliSCRlPTION Wcstonka Intcnention Project is a communitv baseJ nonprotii orearaaaiicn ol soluntccis committed to the reduction of famtly cnoicnce Wcstonka Imercent.on has fourteen (14> trained a oiunteers that live in the Westonka Comntumty These volunteers hav e helped some four-hundred-sixty (460) victims of domestic violence during the past five (5) years These carefully selected volunteers are given extensive traimng to handle domestic abuse situations The volunteers work as crisis advocates on call for crisis inters eniion in domestic violence cases. They olTer referral and suppon services to victims and will accompany them dunng legal priKcdures Wcstonka Inteixention Project also offers community outreach and education programs Five (5) community forums and thirty (aO) speaking engagements have been conducted b>- our agency. Westonka Interv ention Project presently serves some pontons of the Western Hennepin County Area, approximately one-founh of the Lake Minnetonka Community The police depanmenis of these cities and social semce agencies work closelv together depending on one anothe. for suppon and assistance Westonka Inteix ention Project is a unique program because it itaned from a need expressed by the community. Domestic violence was a prevalent problem not being addressed or assisted by any one agency Police, clergy, social service workers, school district members of the community were all being asked to address this issue Tocelher thev staned Wcstonka Intervention Project. Inc .According to Len Harrell. Police for Mound. .Minnesota, police calhbacks for domestic violence situations have been was 472-2141 • P0 E30X34 • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 reduced bv lbrt> <40) percent in hU city alone This produced an ov errs helming support from the Other cities Westonka Inter%ention Project ser\-es At this time, Westonka Inter%ention Project only ser^ es approximately tvventy-fi\-c (25) percent of the total laVe community With the opening of a shelter and assistance from the Mmnesota Department of Corrections and the Depanmenl of Human Services tse tvill now be able to assist all those victims of domestic abuse who choose to take advantage of our service 472-2141 • PO BOX 34 •mound. MINNESOTA 55364 ____-Aw V PROPOSAL Westonka Inienention Project. Inc hereby propo>es to convert the existing Grace Baptist! Church located in Navarre on the corner of County Roads 19 and 15 to a shelter for victims of domestic abuse The shelter would house up to twenty (20) victims of domestic abuse including their familv members In over ten (10) v^ars of operation and hundreds of victims served, vve have never been able to provide safe housing in any of the existing shelters due to the fact tl at they are always full In fact thev have on the average approximately a sixty (60) percent turn-away due to the desperate need for such facilities. Based on our experience at Westonka Intervention, there is a critical need for additional shelter space to meet the needs ot battered women and their children. At present vve serve approximately twenty-five (25) percent of the total Lake Minnetonka Community but with the addition of a professionally staffed shelter vve can serve the entire area The av eraee stay in a shelter for the victims and their families is sev enteen (17) days With this in mind we will be able to house four-hundred and twenty-nine (429) victims a vear I his would be a significant number It will help break the cycle of violence in our ccvmmunity and start the process of healing and enable them to once again become productive members of our community .As a pan of our proposal we will illustrate through graphs and a slide presentation not onlv the need for such u facilitv but how it can be a true asset to the community Manv victims do not obtain Orders for Protection and remain in abusive relationships because they have no place to 472-2141 • PO BCX34 • WOUND. MINNESOTA t:5364 QA/estonfea ^/lojcct V L' The maffrial contained in the overhead material and slide presentation are as folltjws: The need for domestic abuses shelters, l^xal. state and national. Domestics and domestic assault police call totals from Wayzata, Mound, ^rlmletnsta, Orono, Deephaven, and South Shore Police Departments Excerpts from Minnetonka Planning Commission and Minnetonka City Council meetings regarding their shelter (safety, properly \-ahies, etc.) Statements from different shelters around the Twin City area Slides showing the interior and exterior of shelters around the Twin City .Area In conclusion, shelters are a way to break the cycle ofsiolence. 1 hey are created to support non-violent behavior and provide a temporary, safe police for chfldren and women who are in desperate situations Providing a shelter is a statement to the community sasing we will not tolerate violence in our community. We will support non-> iolence. 472-2141 • PO BOX34 • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 r I I QAicstonfca ^nte/ii/6attoa •4^-fr / /. .j MISSION Westonka Intervention is a commurun based project committed to reduce the incidents of domestic \Tolence throogh intervention GOALS I To intervene in domestic abuse situations offering options and support to the victims a to provide victims with information on their rights and options b to accompany victims during legal prvx'edures c to provide transportation to appropriate services d to provide safe surroundings tor victims and their families To assist social services and law enforcement agencies in domestic violence situations to provide twenty-four (241 hour response services to victims involved in domestic abuse situations b to refer v ictims and offenders of domestic violence to the appropnate social serv ice agencies c to foster relationships with other like organizations d to provide advocates who will personally meet with victims after an arrest has been made for domestic violence and offer ongoing support to keep confidential and accurate records of all domestic abuse cases To heitthten community awareness ot domestic violence a to promote public speaking engagements on domestic violence b to provide literature, flyers and posters on domestic violence c to dev elop and offer an updated list of resources to victims and citizens d to offer workshops, inserv ice training and forums on domestic abuse e to network with other community based social service organizations J72 2141 • PO BOX 34 • MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 1 1/ <\VnttN rONSTRl CTION STATKMKNT The followng is descriptive of the various aspects to construction of the project kno%vn as GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH CONVERSION TO A SHELTER FOR W^ESTONKA INTERVENTION PROJECT INC., and to be built by BTK Associates, Limited and which is located at 2380 Shadyvvood Road, Orono. Minnesota 1. 2. 3 4 5 6 7. 8 ITEM ?sl mrONTRACTOR SimiER Survey Permit General Conditions Insurance ArchitecPEng. Grounds Paung Concrete 9.Lumber 10.Demolition 11.Waste Removal 12.Drvwall 13.Insulation 14.Millwork 15.Doors and Windows 16.Hardware 17.Carpentry- 18 Glass 19 Exterior Painting 20 Interior Painting 21.Caulks and Sealants 22.Roofing Repair 23.Ceramic Tile 24.• Vinyl/Carpet 25.Acoustic Tile 26.Utilities 27.Plumbing 28.HVAC 29 Electrical 30.Electrical Fixtures BTK BTK BTK BTK BTK By Seller Master Asphalt BTK Shaw Lumber BTK BTK BTK/Shaw Luniber/Tamarack Tamarack Shaw Lumber Shaw Lumber Shaw Lumber Big Bob BTK Tamarack By Seller Wendgey/BTK Wendgcy/BTK Trenco/T3TK Western RoofmgBTK BTK BTK ETK/famarack NSP Owner Chuck Lee Plumbing (allow) (allow) (allow) (allow) (allow) Total Mechanical LBP, Inc (allow) Vector Electric Vector Electric (allow) (allow) COST s s s s $ S 500 S 1.500 S 1,500 500 6,000 S(NIC) 8,000 2,400 2,500 S 5.300 S 2.000 $ 13.600 2,000 2,750 3,000 1.900 2.500 $(N I.C.) S 3,200 $ 6,500 $ 1,500 $ 700 $ 3,400 $ 12,150 S 5.000 S(NIC.) 7,950 6,200 5.500 $ 2,000 $ $ $ S s s s s 31.Emergency Lighting \'ector Elearic S 1.400 32.Security System N'ector Electric (allow)$ 3.000 33.Fire Suppression AnsuFothers S 450 34.Kitchen Equipment BTK'others (allow)S 11.500 35 Supervision BTK S 4.000 36.Overhead BTK S 3.000 37.Builder's Fee BTK 18% of 5132.700 S 23.886 2L C^ontimiencv Fee BTK 5% of $156,586 (allow)S 7.829 GRAND TOTAL OF AIX COSTS. FEES. AND ALLOWANC KSt S164.4I5 r L. 6 Minnesota Nonprofits Assistance Fund 2700 Univwsit\'A'cnue West Suite 45 St Piul. Minncsou 55114 (612) <^7-001 j A Procram of The Minncapoh* Foundation LOAN APPLICATION ' DATE:September 7, 1994 ^ Organization NAME: We^tonka Interve ntion Project,...I,tiL Federal Tax identification number : _il— J >\DDRESS: .T4on Lvthrum Wav. Box 34. Minneiata—£51£4 CiTY/ZiP C ode C ontact Person : Valerie Hessburg/Pen Hessburg Y ears of Service ; 9_years and. .2-years TmF Executive .-'»-/CQ/D1 rector Phone Nu\mER: ^2-Zl^Z - S68‘£Z2a ------------ Background Information : A. Purpose of Organization Cur orcanizaticn intervenes whenever called upon by the police deoartments we serv the victimsorder 0^ protection, attend their hearings, and do follow'-up with the viptlm ping them networP. with other organizations who may be ofhell service to them. B. Description of Clients Serv ed: Victims of domestic violence and abuse. C. Oatc of Incorporation: Ma rch 27 , 1985 D. State of Incorporation In: Minnesota CURRENT NEFD^ A. Dcscnbc the purpose for which the loan ts being requested and the use of the funds The puroose of the lean is to aid us in the purchase and the rehabi 1itaion of the property being purchased. B. Have other alternatives been explored to resolve your financing nccd.^ Desenbe We have made application to the McKnight Foundation as well as the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. We have also been approved by the Minnesota Department of Corrections and Human Services for an annual budget of no less than $552,395.00 which is based on a per diem rate of S63.96. This rate is also based on an occupancy of /O'i. If the occupancy rate is 100'.- our budget would be $503,408.00 LOAhi REQUEST; A. Amount requested: $_/yo, CCC> B. \VTicn do vou need the loan:November 1, 1994 C. Proposed term or repayment penod: 5 years, based on a 15 year amoritization. Indicate the amount your organisation can afford to repay monthly on this debt. (This figure must correspond to MNAF loan pav-ment on the cash flow projection sheet attached). S_ __ A ~7 ^5*' D. MNAF requires collateral to secure its loans List assets vou will use to secure this loan. The collateral would be the land and building which has a replacement and land value in excess of $1,000,000.00 1 . Is this collateral used to secure anv ether loan No 2. If collateral is a foundation grant or government contract, list contact person and submit a copy of the award letter or contract. Name: Phone Number: fiscal INEOR.MATIO.N: Provide an estimate of your regular ongoing sources of revenue by percent; **(> Govcmnicnt grants/contracts / % Foundation/corporate grants Individual donations/mcmbcrships Earned income - % United Way B. Fiscal or accounting year: from __.... % Other to . 2 of 7 ion c Name of bank and the semces uuloed: mrqubtte Bank. :!ound. riinneso _. Checking Account - 034546_--------------------------------------------- <;a\/inQs Account » 2320.^ D Budget: Income S. Expenses $, L\ST year This ye .\r N ext Y e\r E. Current receivables: < Aroint F. Current payables: S -0- G List all short and long term loan obligations: LENDER Balance Payoff Date PAYMENT H Cash Flow Projections: Comnletc the anached cash flow projections, indicating your ability to repay the loan. ^Photocopy the cash flow form found on page 5 if the payment penod you arc proposing extends bevond six months. V. ATTACHMENTS: Please attach copies of the following; A. Annual Filing with the Minnesota Secretary of State e: Current list of Board of Directors w ith address and length of association. IRS tax-exempt letter establishing federal ta.x c^i.r.tntinn Act -D: Letter confirming annual registration under the MN Lhantable Solicitation -jgf Last year's financial statement/audit report. F. Current vear ’s operating budget. G. Current year ’s financials, including balance sheet and opcrMmg statement JTr' Cash flow projections for the term of the loan (sj?g-a ttach ed) ^ Signed Corporate Borrowing Resolution (sec attached) CP’ Board minutes authonzing loan amount ^KT^lost recent form 990 filed with the IRS. plan which desenbes the proposed project, its place in the market and the fu management structure and associated budget 3 of 7 i » ACCEPTANCE FEE POLICY NINAF has instituted a ikw policy which requires a 1** acceptance fee for all loans over $ 100.000 that are not disbursed within jO ciiys of appro\ ai. This fee will be collee*"»^ at the point the request is presented to the Loan Committee, and will be returned wthm five working dav s if the loan request is not approv cd The entire fee will be apphal to principal and interest for loans disbursed within 12 months of the approval date. If however the borrower withdraws the application once a loan is approvtsl and funds have been set aside, NINAF reserves the fight to retain the entire fee. By my signature below. I certify that I have read and understand the ACCEPTANCE FEE POLICY set out in the above paragraphs. I also certify that the intormation contained herein and submitted in support ot this loan request is complete and accurate. CHAIR Signature Exec irnvE Di^tor Signature ^^ .lav Pptersen Valerie Hessburq TiTE OR PRINT NAME TYPE OR PRINT NAME a/fi/04 9/6/94 -__________________ ■ ■ ■■■ DATE DATE The Annual Report of The MinneapoUs Foundation lists the names of aU organiiatioiis who are involved in the program aedvities of the Foundadon. If this loan request is approved and disbursed, your organizadon will be listed as a recipient of loan funds from the Foundadon. If your organization needs technical assistance in preparing this application, please contact. Minnesota Nonprofits Assistance Fund 2700 Univcrsitv .Avenue West. Suite 45 St. Paul. .MN’ 55114. 612/647-0013 4 of 7 Minncst ta Nonpiofits /Xsststance Fund Cash Flow ProjectionsName of Orgaiiizaticn DateCurrent Montli __^9^___Ay %yPfc^cted Actyal frcifeclad ActuI Profcctcd Artiml Pro^ectnd A chm I Attnnl Ptojcctnd Amal ToinlCaili Rcccipft• OfMlUl)Confiffiic42) Hipccted o /7m^/7*v>/r^Cofitribvlkiftt /JJ 3 •/JJ3 -A2-21./-»>vService Feet /9fyt A T Til iUftiled Way ' Meinbenhip ■! MNAFU mm Ollier Total Reoelpif Al9c/Jj± Caiii Ditbynementt Operalini Expentei MNAF Loan FaymenI /7ry 7 7r>7 Oiber Loan Payment Other ** Payment of Patl Dtac Payabki Total DiibyncmenU yyJ3 f Cash Eacest (Short)//J f Dcfinnini Caah Balance Emling Cash Balance * I) ConCrmcd grants ire those which have written confirmation from the donor. 2) Expected grants ire those which have i high probaWIily of being awarded because of past hbtory or recent iodicatioiii. Please see other side for detail. Total Past Due Payables c.y — 5 of 7 Minnesota Nonprofits/Vssistanee I uiul Cash Flow ProjectionsName of Organization DateCitf leoi MoadI y^rc.V TuialProjected Arlital ProffTted Actual PrriectpJ Actyil I Pfo|fctfd Artad Pic^?cTe4 Acrual IhcMeUedi ActualCmIi Reccifiit .* Oraiitsl}Coiiririiied2) Bipcctad /7oa JesQMtrib«tkMN •/C /oaService Feet ±£iou^jClafZte '/'?rUnKcdWajr ► A JS ~ ^-------- Mcflibenlilp MNAFI am Ollier Toed Receipts \l7JA7..ii7/A7jO Jo^-trv » SJWf. Cash IMborsemcim Yaas^Operating Fjtpenses /rrr 3C7.^bo MNAFtMii faymenl yjyj^f Other Loan PaytneiM *)nifi 1 cril oi Pan Due Payables VrtT bi Ciirifmcnli ■ ■.TT-r-rrn-iTi--------^Yr^Tc'O » Cash Facets (Short)C O /V C C>f7o —\ Reginnini Cash Balance —^i — II. Ending Cash Balance . * I) ConOmicd grants arc those which have v^iillcn conrirnialion from Ihe donor. 2) Expected grants are those which have a high probabilily of being awarded because of past hfelory or recent indiaiiions. Please see other side fur detail. Total Past Due Payables jK^aK. Minnesota Nonprofits Assistance rutul Cash Flow ProjectionsName of Organization y"Date 9/^ '9^OnicalMaalk _______________________:Ay*TotalfroyecloiAct sal frofccittl Actual AcHltl Plci^teif Acliut flofcclai Acinal fVefactai Acmii!) Co«liri»t4 k . ... - .. . -2)Ei|mci «I -ZZara.yro*/7e^CoirfcMttoiw •^<33y yScrvlc«Fcct A99Jt A^TfS Jy^>o-y itMwaWair Mtaiktnilip MNAPL om Ollier Total Keoripli ilZ^LlT Caeli OtibMffCMeiMt OpcfHiiif Eipcatet ,-fPvVr // MNAF Loan Paymciil /77J'yrry /77i/'/77^ Oilief Loao fajrmeat Other ** PaymcNt of Tmi D«k Pairabici Total Dis^rscmciut <3f /^t»<j7zSt^s.y>y/e. CathEaccii (Short)C U7o /7?/C Bcfhuiiiig CMh DalMKC EiiJIfig Ottli Balance * I) ConGrmcd grants are those iwhich have wiitlcn cunfiinulioa from Ibc donor. 2) Expccied grants are th(»e which have a high probability of being awarded because of past history of recent bdiVations. riense see other side for detail. Total Past Due Payables a r r I ? vestonka intervention- anaf loan 08-15-1994 16:26:43 raqo 1 Ccmpoundini} interval: Monthly Annual percentage rate. . . Rate per coapounding period Equivalent daily rate. . . . Valuation date: 11-01-1994 9.5001 0.7917% 0.02603% Value:170,000.00 CASH FLOW DATA First date Payccnt aaount Interval Last date 12-01-1994 1,775.18 180 Monthly 11-01-2009 AMORTIZATICIl SCHEDULE - Nomal anortization Pat Date Pa>Tacnt Interest Principal 1 12-01-1994 1994 totals 2 01-01-1995 3 02-01-1995 4 03-01-1995 5 04-01-1995 6 05-01-1995 7 06-01-1995 8 07-01-1995 9 08-01-1995 10 09-01-1995 11 10-01-1995 12 11-01-1995 13 12-01-1995 1995 totals 14 01-01-1996 15 02-01-1996 16 03-01-1996 17 04-01-1996 18 05-01-1996 19 06-01-1996 20 07-01-1996 21 08-01-1996 22 09-01-1996 23 10-01-1996 24 11-01-1996 25 12-01-1996 1996 totals 26 01-01-1997 27 02-01-1997 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 21,302.16 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 21,302.16 1,775.18 1,775.18 Balance at 11-01-1994 1,345.83 1,345.83 1.342.43 1,339.01 1.335.56 1,332.08 1.328.57 1,325.03 1,321.47 1,317.88 1.314.26 1,310.61 1,306.93 1,303.22 15,877.05 1.299.49 1,295.72 1,291.92 1,288.10 1,284.24 1,280.36 1.276.44 1.272.49 1,268.51 1.264.50 1,260.46 1,256.38 15,338.61 1.252.27 1,248.13 429.35 429.35 432.75 436.17 439.62 443.10 446.61 450.15 453.71 457.30 460.92 464.57 468.25 471.96 5,425.11 475.69 479.46 483.26 487.08 490.94 494.82 498.74 502.69 506.67 510.68 514.72 518.80 5,963.55 522.91 527.05 Balance 170,000.00 169,570.65 169, 168, 168, 167, 167, 166, 166, 166, 165, 165, 164, 164, 137.90 701.73 262.11 819.01 372.40 922.25 468.54 011.24 550.32 085.75 617.50 145.54 163.669.85 163,190.39 162,707.13 162,220.05 161,729.11 161,234.29 160,735.55 160.232.86 159,726.19 159,215.51 158,700.79 158,181.99 157,659.08 157,132.03 v«st6nXa intarvantion- cnaf loan 08-15-1994 16:26:43 Paq|« 2 Pat Data 28 03-01-1997 29 04-01-1997 30 05-01-1997 31 06-01-1997 32 07-01-1997 33 08-01-1997 34 09-01-1997 35 10-01-1997 36 11-01-1997 37 12-01-1997 1997 totals 38 01-01-1998 39 02-01-1998 40 03-01-1998 41 04-01-1998 42 05-01-1998 43 06-01-1998 44 07-01-1998 45 08-01-1998 46 09-01-1998 47 10-01-1998 48 11-01-1998 49 12-01-1998 1998 totals 50 01-01-1999 51 02-01-1999 52 03-01-1999 53 04-01-1999 54 05-01-1999 55 06-01-1999 56 07-01-1999 57 08-01-1999 58 09-01-1999 59 10-01-1999 60 11-01-1999 61 12-01-1999 1999 totals Payment 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 21,302.16 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 21,302.16 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 1,775.18 21,302.16 Interest 1.243.96 1.239.76 1.235.52 1.231.25 1.226.94 1,222.60 1,218.22 1.213.82 1.209.37 1,204.89 14,746.73 1.200.38 1.195.83 1,191.24 1,186.62 1.181.96 1.177.26 1.172.53 1.167.76 1.162.95 1,158.10 1,153.22 1.148.29 14,096.14 1.143.33 1.138.33 1.133.29 1,128.20 1.123.08 1,117.92 1,112.72 1,107.47 1,102.19 1,096.86 1,091.49 1.086.08 13,380.96 Principal 531.22 535.42 539.66 543.93 548.24 552.58 556.96 561.36 565.81 570.29 6,555.43 574.80 579.35 583.94 588.56 593.22 597.92 602.65 607.42 612.23 617.08 621.96 626.89 7,206.02 631.85 636.85 641.89 646.98 652.10 657.26 662.46 667.71 672.99 678.32 683.69 689.10 7,921.20 Balance 156,600.81 156,065.39 155,525.73 154,981.80 154.433.56 153,880.98 153,324.02 152,762.66 152,196.85 151.626.56 151, 150, 149, 149, 148, 148, 147, 146, 146, 145, 145, 144, 143, 143, 142, 143 , 141, 140, 139, 139, 138, 137, 137, 136, 051.76 472.41 888.47 299.91 706.69 108.77 506.12 898.70 286.47 669.39 047.43 420.54 788.69 151.84 509.95 862.97 210.87 553.61 891.15 223.44 550.45 872.13 188.44 499.34 (»i.inu Abj AiKJitkmal/..........f »0 // #f%f f t fi t f if 0 / / 2) |{if«cclcd C•raflts Amount Kr<|«c9icJ 't %,(PfO 6 fj CPfjO ^ - ......... /rf i:-4^ 45^ Date Pfi»|H*tal 5ubDiittc J / / y'/ / / / •# # ^ / / f' l>ate of Revko Dale IU|H:ct£j is (if aut Ui|>cctcil? jzT-' ‘?S 7;-., ' r / ^/ # f •/, ^0 ff // " 0i ' ^ 0 0 ^0 f 0 f 0 0 // / ^r ^ t ^0 / / ✓ / ✓/ // / < / r . /'/' /r /}'>'/’ ✓0', 6ol 7 wr 1 IT n 1^ a i .. . , CORPOR.ATE Borrowing Resolution REiOLVtD. tha Uie Prcsuleni. Vtcc Pre5Kien:s. Treasurer. SecreTary. ami Executive Director * hercmartcr reterred to as Otticers ot Westonka Intervention Project. Inc. ____________. * Minnesota nonprofit corporation, any one ot whom ts authorized to borrow from time to time, in the name of and in behalf of this corporation from The Minneapolis Foundation . heremaftcr referred to as the Fund, such sums or money is said officer deems etpediem. from time to time to extend or renew any such loan in whole or in pan from said Fund; and said officer is hereby authorized to execute in its corporate name the note or notes of this Corporation as evidence ot each such loan and of any extension or renewal thereof. R£S0LVED Further that said officer is authorized to hypouhecate or pledge with a transfer and deliver to said Fund as security for the payment of any obligations so incurred such securities or OLher assets of this Corporation as are agreed upon by them and said Fund and to execute in the name of the Corporation such agreements of hypothecation as they deem expedient and to inJude in any such agreement such waivers of demand, notice or advertisement and such other waivers and provisions as seem expedient to them, including among others a provision that any such security may be held by said Fund to secure any other indebtednes.s. whether due or not due, owing to such Fund from this Corporation. R esolved Further that if two or more resolutions of this Corporation authorizing any of the transactions authorized by this resolution are outstanding concurrently at any time the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be cumulative. R esolved Further that all loans heretofore made by sai 1 officer in the name of this Corporation and all promissory notes and other documents executed by them in connection therewith or to secure the name are hereby ratified and approved. R esolved Further that this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until revoked. This is to certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution duly adopted by the directors of a Corporation, at a meeting ot its Board ot Directors duly held on June 2, 1994 ___________________JfiJ 'hat said resolution is in full force and effect. By: pie«€pnni) Acting Secretarv, Board ot Dir^us / (Signature)^ 19^^ Date 7 of 7 A HOUSiKG ACLNCf t%ln.-fwmt, D>*i«io (j ft 400 $bi*» S«*^ 5>/4* 300 Pmuk. MN J-/;f < f,lUITl-FAMILY DEFERRED LOAM GRAfFT APPLICATIOri I.PROGRAM AND AMOUNT APPLYING FOR:• *- I » Q CjpActy Bvddwf rw»®A*'9 UaiiPiograf9 □ How5if»g Trvit □ Kihily Omf^ Tr«wiii>oai A'Ti □ A^or4«M Rental bivastmam Fwfii 1 n TranMio^aT Housing Piogiam. liLLI^CH? □ Ta.^aia^ Homo Program * Cl TainpofafV Of Trant<«na{ Howfinfi . PfogramShelter for %icti«S of •^USt □ 0«>« fipady^:------------- □ BaaiOaf^al Mo%rsini *0^ Mvam ------—---------------—— 3 Hofnaiass InOtvKjua'S 7T APPLlCAf4T(S) INFORMATION: '►wM Nam# of App*cani;»)/0»9ip»‘2ai>OF« W^stonka Intervention Project, InC. Soc--4i Sacwfity Next) or MN »aA*DNoii) (lor aM aanaotaiA mcHi^ng ipcujoi) Ad<3r#ss (Suaat. Coy. Suit. Zip Cooo) 3490 LythruB Way P.O. Bo* 34, Hound, Minnesota 55364 tttuTComacl Porson Valerie or Don Hesshurg Executive Directors jwnty ol Appica^ Henneoin Taiapnor.o Homa {fyi 47Z-274? ^wioik- rn 1 Type of Appi.cani/Organtzation Q Nonprof4 Agancy/Corpof^cn □ Unil d Govammani □ Individual □ CHCO □ □ Q HowSif>g Authofiy/Commun*y Oevfiopminl Agancf Fof PfoWl Organicar.on/C©rpofai«n Orht (Spacily) □ No Presen^lj^ i^ndiy a ^contingent purchase a^eement 11/15/94 urenasa r ropo y j^^q^qqq q5 ^ Typ. ol E..s!«ig Loan □ Mongaga Q Contact lo. O.td □ Oma.□ Nora Th. M«v,a.o.a Ho.*->g F.anca Agancy doa. no. d.wran.a.a on ,na 0a..» o. .aca. cokx. na.«n* eg.n. sa.. -a^gon. *ga. Of disabUrty in ampioymani cr ma provS^rt Ol ttfvets Eqjal Oppoftunrty Housing and Equal Opportunity Employmani 7/94 SEE ATTAChED Pr«j«ct SUrt Ci’«. ^r9|«ct Completion Calt: j|na-¥ K :g95 Teu* C®*' •f Pr»l«ct:% 37S.000.00 .^an’.a^v i > Us« •* fwndt: Purc^^se «nd re^abilitaticn of church __________________rr lh« .mount »nd - »>*« »»• »• JtlUu ‘iLchC.r.n .f ta SOURCE OF FUN2S ?1nc‘< Gra"t 1 dcf^cr 3>rjai "ocai business d''>^ry r;roDOse d 3100 Gra^'t Funcirg_ ------------------—-------- TOT At % AMOUNT COMMIT It^ fV»f cf ElNANCtNa Tf^MS t' ^rc S4,oco.rr: 7^o.r>: . "CO, Cu 1 N n>a No TTFETST ■ A ,. TrTT ITEU loan amount REQUESTED typ* ol Act.vitTl (Ch»e« *11 Boi.. ih.t •PPiy) □ N#»* CO'iWfUClonu □ □ Acqu'i-tiOrt Rantal (SpacJy): Coop«« u a R«hab«tttat<on Homao^narihip Etlimata Annual incomt and Managfmanl Eiptnsta, SFF ATTATHED Appp^V^^ BUDGEI ___________________________________—I----f^L Kyr,m’,^i I El'^'Jwd C>»I H j F10<«'’'y Of*»» K« f^mcAT Apcitot. Sat i?j«t Rantabm Sqn) l^terlhly ConUOwl RtfM Ta'a* Conaail R#m by Typ- Annu«'y » PrrtWfO'i » 1a' Et'-nljedCrit M 1 Kio^n^tv C»fO»if^eni f.4/^r.iWy UUHHat ^P(Opo»#d Cortracs Paid try Cvcupani I Rant • UUiiUaa) N.I Qp.r.tlng Incom. B.lof D«PI S.'vic. (l.n. 5 l.si L.r> 6) 7/54 I* AOOtTIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION; •*'* Md> m i!-* ino<ai* « a ©•rkmi*: ^ aj^r'cab^ W>w4a yo^r acO’cafon vx>wW ba coTxp»aha^*fva a*« anceuratad io baciaar mrvi corw ft »n !^•V pra%a»<atiQn of Ap#<*canU ah^M ^avida xnm lnf»rmalkM% aata ctaar a^ cc an atiar»»«^a^t to A.Summary Dasc/ipujr o» Projact „...____ZD r"—(Hous ng frusi Fund App/Jcanf$Cn./y/ •Ara you m’fy*h9 ^ lund r>g urda* i^'a 2C% tai<asida^ Q Vm □ Na c ^ Imiw'M 9< 0>e|»c •.« no» **• 30 yM> w«« MMwtMint «l th* r*gwlv How*^ T»w« fut>4 6.Proposad Usa ot f unot Ooa-s and Op.»acitva» mm Dasc/.t>a Pravout b»paManca F.PopMt««a Sarva# t)ascr.ba tSa naad tot yaur piojac! Hoa aitt iha projaci ana^ your otganaaiiofi to mof^ #« 5(v#*y ra^pond fg» houstng naads \r\ tt^ ocwfimiifiity’ Wnai othaf o.ganizatoni ara providing housing of hous n- itmtd larvictt m your oornmuntty? Whal ara tha gapa m aafvca that ara not ba»ng tiHad? "idantity any taaturas d you^ proiad arncn you taai ara wn<3ua. *><wativa. or hava tha capacity a -a.'va as a *mod#r lor MHf A Oascr b# Non Houatng Sarvicas Pro^oad OascfOa mi mar^agamani p'in to# lha px/ak D scusf how you p.an to tali. rant, or iaasa ina ropa. y. inc<uo*nr)j a lanani or homao«»nar saMiori plan and arhal lypa ol suppoi safvicas will ba pfovidad H ary j Dascfiba ho« you p^an to ans^ra t^a «ong \^^m attordab«i<y of lha proposad housing For pfOjac*ri%h.ch raqu.fa c sp^ac.ng currani larams E»p»a.n iirhy us.r>g lha part.cu*ar propart %tuzf\ raqu^as d'SQiacamant it nacaisary and mciuda • ^aiocai»on plan <of d»sp<acad tanants ----- . ■■-— Provioa any omar inlormai»on you taa: !S rtitvanl to luppoh your application V. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION REQUIREMENT Tha M»nnasota Human Rights Act itaias thai any parson or organization having 20 or mora amptoyati i lha S ata^ Mmnasota and invofvad m any transaction of $50,000 or mora with a staia agancy must hava an AMifma! i Action Plan approvad by tha Staia Dtpartmam of Human Rights. ro_gppl»cal1?fl$ .iQf SSQ>S2Q-0f unis SI Thav irctuda fthar: 1. 2 A Carufcita of CompUanca from lha Siata Dapanmani of Human Rights (lof inlormalion ca$ 29 ••• fiK'; Of A notaf*2ad slatamanl stating that tha organizaton has had lass than 20 amptoyaas »r the .Mao! Mmnasota m lha last 12 rr^cr^ths VI. ATTACHMENTS NEEDED:• *■ ... •. 1. Photographs.^^ 2 locatcn map. 3 Support latiars |r ^ i 4 Evidanca of s4a control (signad Saasa. uvarraniy daad. purchasa agraamarM opCiori). s nol tscu td. inoic## plans for 5. SfscfiptiOn of lha mambarship oi^o\jt organization. Attach a list of mambars ol tha govarnirg bidy ol tha organiiatron and ir>dcaia how long lhay hava baan with tha organizaton. H a praparad list it r>ol availabia. 1 15$ ITJ spacs batow to dascriba tha organization t mambarshtp. $. Oatcripton of tita and surrouriding land usts 7. Dascriphon of conitructiorVrahabilrtation to ba complaisd. (Irnriuds construetjoo bids. $ available). 9. Prabmirrary archiitcturaf drawings of any proposad oonsiructon. B availabia • a 9. Supporting documantation idantifying tha naad lor lha housing - local govarnrnanl itudits. iiouSihQ and radavalopmant authority ttudiat. indapanoani markat studiss. tie. 10. Additional orotacl information at raoutsitd m Part IV of lha Applicitiun. This applicaton ii t jbmitiad by tha ur>darsignad with tha full knowladga and cor^ant of tha govarnifig body and fi, to lha Data j r 2t.^oi\i(aciu5 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT Pubiie Saf«ty OffloM 7701 County Ro«l 110 W*sl Mmnolnsta, MionotoU $5364 612<446-1131 FAX 446-1623 Craig A. And«r«on Chiaf of Po4ca Otfador Emarganqii Praparadnass Poilca FIra/Ambulanca Dial 911 CRIME FUND (Donations) P.O. Bci 346. St. Boni.. MN 55375 Memo TO; FROM: DATE; SUBJECT: K-*; ;w3 kA , %“City of Orono Planning Commission f^embera •7 ‘ - . ' Craig A Anderson September 26.1994 j 5 , ^ COMMUNITY SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE j / Violence in our society is creating a sense of fear so strong citizens are beginning to withdraw from assisting those in need They believe if they h^p, they will be placed in harm's way. This thought process is eating away at our society like a cancer If we choose to allow this to curb our judgment, the bullies of our society will one day be the decision makers. Westonka Intervention has a dream: To provide a safe place for those who fail victim to domestic violence. Victims of domestic abuse need ‘time out' from the violence. They need a safe place to think and a place where their children can relax and feel safe. Westonka Intervention has searched long and hard to locate property for a shelter. I know this will not be an easy decision for you to make. Emotions may run high. Your ability to separate perception from the facts will be challenged. We all know emotions may shield our ability to absorb the facts of an issue and, as a result cloud our judgment. I ask that you listen to the facts. Inquire of Chief Sullivan as to the potential impact to the community, the type of incidents that may take place and how often they may occur, based on other shelter experiences. Thence, your decision will be founded on facts and sound, reasonable information. With the proper management, I am confident you will find the shelter to be an asset to the community, a good neighbor and a safe haven for victims of domestic violence. CAA;lab SERVING WITH PRIDE, INTEGRITY AND EXCELLENCE TO PROVIDE QUALITY RESPONSIVE SERVICE. ; Pnn/ed on rvcyc dd •5' Date: To: From: RE: October 10, 1994 Jean Mabusth/Steve Sullivan Kurt Erickson Domestic Abuse Shelters '.‘srSdSi;".' ;s;r.:5',nTvr?»r™ have had five calls. The 1994 calls break down to include an attempted vehicle theft, miscellaneous public, damage to property, lock out, and domestic. Taking out the lock out and the miscellaneous public, the calls remaining are the domestic, d^age to property and attempted vehicle theft. Without actually pulling the reports, it is unable to determine if these calls are caused by people staying in the shelter, people coming to the shelter or transient reports occurring in that general area. It is certainly clear that there are no heavy demands for service caused by this. In speaking to Home Free Shelter, I found the director of the program, as identified as Mary Monteon, phone 559-9008. Home Free indicated that they are programmed to accept up to thirty people, however, they frequently are slightly in excess of that nu^er. They refused to qive out any additional information about problems they have, etc., stating that I would have to talk to Mary and that she was out of town on vacation for sometima yet. I spoke to Sojourner Shelter, they are located at 4703 Circle, Minnetonka, MN 55343, pho.ne 933-7422. I ® party who identified the director of the program as Sue Aumner. I did not have an occasion to speak with Sne^ but the person I was talking to told me they have had no significant problems. Sojourner is a facility located in a residential neighborhood, its on a culde-sac, they originally had quite a bit of controversy about he facility being put in there, but since they have gone in, all concerns have primarily vanished. Sojourner is noraally holding between twelve and sixteen people in the facility, tnrougn their permits with Minnetonka they are allowed a maximum of sixteen people. The main problem that Sojourner does have at this point and time is concerns over traffic, they occasionally will end up with two or three cars parked in the culde-sac and that is the only pro e that has been identified so far. r / I ,?ff!W?«. '/}«»*» I I 0 I OM> c rcrrts: r^P*0\C^ «>aip& To &e MAiK UevBL. P^N WOM»4 1----------ri3• 5 1 ’ Mftr4 BTK & ASSOC., LTD. ARCHITECTS A BUILDERS WESTONKA INTERVENnOlsT PROGRAM SHELTER \ 1 r ei255C5CeO c:tv c' *wVmc-1 ■’a ^cc 633 S#C-3C Pri 10:C5 rLTMOimi ZONING mUIMAKCE &ctl3Hi 4, SDfedinsuui B a Laa4 Om tlaaa and c n«MMd TZait Oa«« •n ix»dlvidi in rvlatior ut«« locaei provlfliona FosImI F ** Note 7€71 ^ 3 •* _______ _ ‘ill* 0^7 0 ty Facilitiwa athar than aa »y be located Ith regard to e aa well aa Flat A drawing or eap of a aubdivieien. meeting all the requirement a ol the City and in auch foxQ aa required by the County for purpoeea cf recording. fremiaea A lot or plot with the required front, aide and rear yarda for a dwellinq or other uae aa allowed under this Ordinance. fttblle Watara*-watera which are dafined xn Kinneaota statutea Section lOld.OOS, Subdlviaione iS and 14; for purpeaea of the Shoreland Kanageaient Overlay District, thia meana lakas, ponda, and flcwagea of more than 10 acres and straama, creeks, and water coursas having a total drainaga araa of 2 square r.ilea or more, ihia does not mean a body of water created by a private user, where there was no previous shoreland, aa defined by the Department of Natural Reeourcee, for a designated private use allowed by this Ordinance and authoriead by the Departcvcnt cf Katural Resources. The official determination of the site and phyaicel limits of lakaa, pends, or flovages shall be made by the CoBiaiaeioner of the Department cf Natural Reeourcee pureuant to state statutes. (Aeiend Ord. 9e*10) Reach A hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a Btraam or river influenced by a natural cr manmade obatructien. In an urban area, tha aagmant of a stream or river between two coneecutive bridge croseings would moat typically constitute a reach. Recreation Vehicle For purposes of thie Ordinance, the term shall include the meaning of ‘recreational camping vehicla* as defined in Minnesota Statutes 327.14, Subd. 7; and travel trailere, pickup coaches, motor homes and eairping trailera, ‘manufactured hosies* as defined in this Section, which are lees than 40 feet in body length, converted busee, and converted vans which can be and are used ac tengjorary dwallinga for travel, recreational, and vacation purpoaea. (Amended Ord. 62-24) Regional Flood A flood which is representative of large floods kno%m to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably chsrsctaristlc of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100 year recurrence interval. Regulatory Flood Rrotection Elevation A point not less than one foot above tha water surface profile aaeociated with the regional flood plus any incraasee In flood heights attributable to encroachmento on the flood plain. It is the elevation to which usea regulated by thia Ordinance are required to be elevated or flood proofed. Raaldential Facility A dwelling where a State*licensed raeldential program, public or private, which for gain or otherwiaa, regularly providea *24- hour*psr-day substitute for care, food, lodging, training, education, supervision, habilitation, rehabilitation, or treatment for one or more persons, as defined by the State Huc3n Services Licensing Act, outside a 4-13 ei255C5CaO c:rv cs Pumc-TH »a3* 2 3 *,:e C23 S#e-33 e-l ie:C5 1S94 n^-MOtTM ZQMSG ORDINANCE 4, SubtStiwm R p«r«on'« own h^m. mxcmpt In th#> cas* of paraaiHi with aantal rataxdatlon tha proyrsn n,ry in thn p^raoo'a hoKa. (Ord.p^raon Kwaldafltlal Sbaltar X aupanriaad facility providinn abort-tarw houaing, food, and protaction for tranalant indlvlduala. Tha taf» doaa not inelud#i Kaaidantial racilltlaa, Coaminlty Corractxonal PaciUtiaa. Day Cara facilitiaa, Ketela. Hotala. or tturaing NcMa. tha tarn alao doaa not includa a Plaei of »*orahip uaad for naaidanclal Shaltar purpoiaa for vLi- \ non-conaacutlva yarioda of ona »aalc or laia for up to ai* tinaa par J_ __ calendar year (Ord. if-31) (*«and Ord, 92-2»» aaatauranta (Claaa tl Traditional Reataurant rood *a aarvad to a euatoaar and eonau*ad by hie whvla eaatad at a countar or tabla. Cafataria feed aalaccad by a oiatomer whlla joinj through a aarvinj line and^ taican to a tebla for conauwption. Ho (Rora than 40 parcant of tha tota* food ■alaa »ay ba for takeout or d*llvery. (X-*sr.d Crd. 93-2) Raatauranta (Claaa XI) Pa§t food Raatauranta A majority of cuatemara order and ara aarvad thair food at a counter and taka it to a table or counter where It la cenaujaad. However, a significant nuaber »ay ta)te the food eutaida to sat in an autoaiobila or Off the pramiaaa. Driva-ln Rsacaurant Moat euateeiara coneuee •heir food in an autonobila reqardlaaa of how it la earwad. Carry Out and oallvary Raatautant Pood is prepared for coni’^Haption off the premiaaa. Kota than 40 percent of the total food aalaa ia purchaaed for takaout or delivery. (Affitnd Ord. 92*:) •ooflina That lina at which an exterior wall aurtaca cf a building departs from the vertical plane and, typically, where the horiiontal plane of tha roof coBmencas. Mansard-lika roof traatmants B»ay ba conaidered aa extenaiona of a building wall aurfaea whan tha oaneard-like treatment xa applied around the entire parimatar of tha building; otherwiae. the manaard-lika treatment will be ceaialdered part of the roof. (Amended Ord. No 14-24) Rubbish Waste products which have compoead wholly or partly of such patsriSi.B garbage, aweepinga, awill, cleanings, trash, refuse, litter, induatriel solid wastes or dOJ^astic eolid waet.ee; organic wastaa or residua cf animale, fruit, or other vegetable or animal matter from kitchen, dining room, market, food esrabliahjt.ant or any place dealing or handling peat, fowl, fruit, grain, or vagatablaa; offal, animal excreta, or tha carcaaa of animals; tree or ehrub trinsiinga, or grase clippings; brick, plaatar, wood, metal, . roofing materials, pipe or other waste matter resulting from the de-molition, sltsrstion or construction or buildings or structurae; aceur.ulsted waste matariale, cans, used containers, boxss and packing matariale, junk vehicles, ashes, tires, 3unk, (jhristmss trees, rocks, sod, dirt, glass, jars, bottles, auto parts, cement brick, leaves, bum barrels, household appliances, furniture, toys, floor coverings, fabric, drain oil, aolvants and fluids, or other such substance which .may become a nuisance. (Aff.ende Ord. S7-31) School A building used for tha purpoae of elapantary or aecondary education, which meeta all the raquiraioante of cmrpulaory education laws of the Stare of Minnesota, and not providing rasidsntisl accocT'Odatlonfl. Senior (Elderly) Citixan Housing Multiple Family Dwellings which are designed, built, and operated for exclusive occupancy by persons at least 55 years old Senior Citixan housing shall include cartai ancillary facilities and special features asBCClstsd with living n 4-14 ei255C5C«C Cf^ OF I*a5* 3'S JCC 62C ItO-SC i0;0fl FITHXITH ZQHim OftDISARCl DISTRICTS P R-1A 44. M R-1B H-? 45. 45. 47. 45. R-J R-4 4S.4k* \SV Section 7, Subdivision C USES -Cey Cire Ficillty serving 1? or fc«r persons In • Single Faaily Detached Dwelling. •Residential Facility senring 6 or fewer persws in a Single Faaily Detached (K«e1Hng. -Residential Facility serving 7-16 persons operated on the premises of an allowed Multiple Fanlly Dwelling or Dwellings. as regulated in Section 9. -Residential Facility serving over 16 perswis operated on the premises of an allowed Multiple^ Faaily Dwelling or Dwellings, as regulated in Section 9. -Residential Shelter, as in Section 9. (Nos. 43-47 Ord. 89-38) regulated -Nursing Hoflw, Residential Facility, serving more than six persons. Residential Shelter and similar properly licensed and sanctioned treatment facilities In operation as of November 20, 1989. (Ord. 90-18) 7-8 > b«s«d located r« than ling or hadu1ad emight 9r aach h altar I by tha Ion of td. In to a IB ara B8*S08, ■ Which ich ara m tha an of a ing a plo# a saad 23 tubjact fell not f to a iration Santial ^atraat a staff ^rivata luaodata ad with a onto an opan a to ba A 9) 10) 11) 12} 13) 14) f ^ c 3 o A ^ • A. ^'t r . oo * ZONING OROINANCi: SECTION 300.16 FACE 74 city det«r»lno3 that aita characteristics or aitiqatlve caacurea to anaura safe vehicular circulation ara present. Adequate sight distance at the access point shall be available. (Anandad by Ordinance l8-soi, i-i-88.) 6) all facilities to confora to the requirements of the Minnesota state building code and fire code; landscape buffering from surrounding residential uses to be provided consistent with the requiresents contained in section 300.27 of this ordinance. A privacy fence of appropriate residential design may be required to limit off-site impacts. Landscape screening from surrounding residential uses may be required by the city depending on the type, location and proximity of residential areas to a specific facility; submission of detailed program information including goals, policies, activity schedule, staffing patterns and targeted capacity which may result in the imposition of reasonable conditions to limit the off-sits impacts; the facility to be overseen by a board of directors; submission of bylaws of the board of directors, resumes of members of the board of directors and articles of incorporation to the city; neighborhood representatives to be invited to sit on the board of directors or advisory board if required by the city; for community based residential care facilities only, a bacXground Investigation shall be performed to verify the qualification of the director and the responsible operation of the program. This investigation to be paid for by the applicant; submission of a formal site and building plan review if a determination of need for such review is made by the city; and additional conditions may be required by the city in order to address the specific impacts of a proposed facility. private, non-profit recreational facilities as a principal use s.* a. [ V i ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 3QQ.16 PAGE 75 v\ ■itft and buildlnq plan aubjact to ravlav pursuant to •action 300.27 of thi» ordinanco I^oni 5 «0 SB NO. $4-21 ys f hold a publtG •und officti at definition (or itiai structures (no for victims id "Victims of Business (B*2) Change would neral Business be given the 1 * i d&it. Prtile»Iojul>rnk'r^. Im\Park IXicr Pettier Suite #/?■/.> 5775 Wumj U Routesanl MinaejpoU^i. MS 551 IS-!234 h'.ix ISI2) 595-4473 l^me 16121 595-4400 September 28, 1994 Ms. Jeanne Habust Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Mabust: I am writing in favor of the conversion of Grace Baptist Church, Orono, to a domestic abuse shelter by the Westonka Intervention Project, Inc. In my 35 years of experience in fund raising we have worked for several halfway houses all the way from chemical dependency and sexual orientation facilities to chemical3y dependent youth facilities. All of these centers have been an asset to their communities and have not caused neighborhood hardship. The most famous Twin City facilities that we worked for are the Lewis Houses in Burnsville and Apple Valley. Both of these facilities are considered neighborhood improvements by their neighbors. They were named after a Deephaven veterinarian who was a state representative. The Omegon facility in Hopkins is another exeunple of a well-integrated program operating out of an old school building. Grace Church is ideally locatec to serve Westonka. Ask anyone in the profession and you will discover there's a real need for facilities to house abused mothers and their children. iTScercly,- Jot^XJ. Fischer JGF:bs SEP 30 IW C\TV CF CBONO k'ecislrrnl in the St.ite nf Minnesotn. Sert ins the I pprr MidtieM. P O im 272 Hoptom^ MN 55343 SOJOURNER PROJECT INC.Serving Battered Women and Their ChildrenBusiness 612933^7433 Shelter 612 93>7422 Voct/TlX) iL Conufmmfy iVivncacy 612 93S 1004 intervention M 2 ^3S 7007 - Septeaber 15, 1994 -r-«* To kiiQiii It May Concern: B Sojourner Project has offered shelter to battered wo«en and their childr*''' for over 15 j’cars. To ay knowledge, there has never been an incident of vlolenct > a perpetrator at or near our shelter. It i.s generally known that our shelter is a secure facility and that we have a very good relationship with our local police department who will provide extra support if needed. Our shelter is not able to house most of the battered women and children who contact us needing a safe place to stay. Historically and currently, a vast majority of the thousands of women requesting and using our shelter services, and who we must turn away due to lack of space, are fre® the inner city of Minneapolis. We work with all women we turn away in an attempt to find other options for their immediate safety. It is getting increasingly difficult to find and connect battered women and children with safety options that adequately meet their needs. Based on our experience at Sojourner Project, there is a critical need for additional shelter space to meet the needs of battered women and children particularly from the metropolitan area. Sincerely. Sue Aumer Executive Director ? i September 10, 19^ j I ^ J To Whom It May Concern, for a Women s Shelter. we know that the sight of the fomer Grace Baptist Church in Navarre would be perfect. we are excited and have 9-t Ho^ «^at - - shelter soon in our area. The neea We neve suptorte. ^ ” isr S “K- «n.n s Wn. 01 Pon»e. to commit ourselves to this project. We believe that you will give this shelter your support as wellll Sincerely, Sandy Schultz President St. John ’s WELCA September 15. 1994 I To Whom It May Concern: St. John ’s WELCA (Women of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America) has financially supported the Westonka Intervention for many years. The following amounts have been paid out to Westonka Intervention in the past years. In 1994 we budgeted a higher amount in the hopes of having our own shelter. 1994 • $1,000.00 1993 - 500.00 1992 - 400.00 1991 - 500.00 1990 - 600.00 Our WELCA Board has already voted to give $750.00 for 1995. We feel we could add to this amount by a few hundred dollars by conducting an additional fund raiser in support of a Westonka Shelter. Submitted by: Sandy Schultz WELCA PRESIDENT dVH * It 4t ^ ■* ■\• «i ♦C'8 11-8BABdQ1861 *21 *8C2 isuoiflpiO0861 *11 ‘822 MuowpJO8^61 *tl *>12 «3uiuipjo8Z6I ‘92 -‘39013». *G12 *3u*uipJ08Z6I *6 ‘902 *3'J»uvpao/Z6l *ll *102 aauvuipiO9261 *22 *6^1 aaufuipao9261 *frl *S8l aousuipjo:<Cq papudtt* sy \ \ ‘X iCjtmrtf* aA|l3«i>3 *6t jagwopap ‘z/l apututp.«n pa;dopy )3li|SK] iuauJdoiaA»c “OflJn piuuoio ‘|5|J|S1Q tsauisna poouioqi|6i»N papujii l3iJ)S{g ssMifsng teuOts$a|OJd a^mo laiJlsiQ ssaufsna iaiuao 6uKS<k>MS IPijjSiO ssauisne ajotfsa^ai ptJlSiQ ssauisng sates HSiag iji %« # S W I 9-9 1U3SNIfr *s 9-9 1-oi-aiOl-tfl \aNIT^lOHSl-Dl-tfl iN<o<i /4 % t » f4 •• «t , j*< . 4 ... "• 'i j: *; '4 ‘ • ■ «' ..k-}f '•„t f. . • »' t' pW ■ ^ • •1 a* • • V • ^ ' • • ■ V 4 f ■; w . • • . V ; .•. . ^ •, V * * •!•:. . • :,y;‘ . - • • r. 1 .1 ■ 1 ; VH.',: * • # • ' *. ■v>;; •; #!/#-' <"• r *; .it ■•.'> • V • i. • «•■. .'.4 I*;s.'»v .• > \ .t.,t ■ Mt'UonvltUfi Council MJk Rasi Tinii Stfi'cl i*»rk L>nU' Si r»nl. MN V'llO* IGJI filP-291 tU.?. TUDliVIOWI :oi PCI o:t i:- ’94 12:21 TiflsF llassMAiL I us rOMAGh ' TAiD S> Paul. Mf4 |'o*in ?N o ?O20 Post-It ' brand lax transmittal memo 7671 • of pages ► rhon#• ^ Fsv a REGIONAL BLUEPRINT 0 Rtcycicd pace* Con^inj ai fast 5C*% pcsi-ccniumer Mosto ■ BLUEPRINT ADOPTED, ACTION PHASE BEGINS With the adoption of the Regional Blueprint by the Metropolitan Council on Sept. 22, the hard work begins. The new challenge for the Council Is to develop programs and effective partnerships with individuals and organizations around the region to work toward a more livable Twin Cities area by acting on the Blueprint directives. The^ouncll is currently working to I^MgratfiB/uep.nfnf directions into if^RSs *rk ^grem, Identifylnq kej^artnershlps to be foPme^or expanded, and pursuing existing^ programs that support the Blueprint. ■ A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION The Blueprint lays out an ambitious agenda of action to be carried out by the Council, other governmental units, private and nonprofit organizations, the business and education communities and many others. The strategies of the Blueprint cover a broad front: Strengthen the regional economy by boosting economic growth, international competitiveness and job creation. Foster reinvestment In distressed areas, to produce new job.s and tax bass, rehabilitation of dilapidated housing, and attractive amenities. Create stronger communities, v;ith a sense of place, “neighborhood” and ccnnection to the region as a whole. Preserve the natural environment as the region grows. Set directions for orderly growth, supported with cost^stfective regional services. Expand affordsbls housing choice, especially for people with lower incomes, and lift-cycle housing opportunities for all people at various stages of life. In the Blueprint, the Council moves beyond its traditional role of regional systems planning and fiscal management to address complex economic and societal Issues. It draws on Uie Council’s new responsibilities for operating vital regional services for transit and wastewater treatment, and coordinating those services more effectively with regional planning ^nd affordable housing services Asll^e 4feeds of the region change, the Blu^ri/gy/ill be refined, but will follow thes?feglonal directions: October 1994 • Analyze and report regional economic growth and monitor progress toward economic goals. • Examine current and future needs for high-quality regional infrastructure to meet economic and technol • CCH with lo initiatiw • Wo educatl skills ol Wo Ml ci! late Wat liildriCM builtl public ntsds. anu I Position the r^lon to compete In the glol^il marketplace by encouraging economic growth, incmased productivity and job erd^tion. The region needs a strong eco^my to compete effectively in international marketplace and improve our standard of livin Economic growth requires strori public foundations. Including ^ supportive business climate^ infrastructure that meets business needs and a work force that Is well-trained. Successful local economic development efforts need to encourage the growth of local ■ businesses and retain existing* businesses. | Actions # • Lead a collaborative, metro-v^e effort to a regional economic strategy. / I Create a climate of reinvestment In distressed areas of tha region, with a focus on supporting and Improving local buainess and restoring confidence in neighborhoods. The strength of the region as a whole depends on the vitality of all its parts. Distressed areas In the central cities and other older areas of the region need to be economically and physically revitallzed-attracting new business development and expanding the tax base by reducing barriers to redevelopment. Neighborhoods facing decline require bolstering to renew confidence In them as good places for people to live, raise children and invest in a home or business. Jobs, affordable housing and transportation need to be linked together. These links would open up access to new jobs wnere lower-income people live, more affordable housing where new jobs are located, better transportation to REGIONAL BLUCPItlNI l\)i r n*C>:t 13 “?4 U‘; •••'I ; ! * * ■Vfi/. • ■1*. .( • •!* ' i ■ • t 1 M. H ’ i v'l « " i• /i *. 1 'i d4* .* 1.•1 •• i ».r- r,• . •1: ••* . * . .i i ■«» .•! V.t' * ' . , I. **. .t ,>• I •. employment centers, and job training that Improves work skills and work readiness. Actions: • Work to create a metropolitan enterprise fund to support a wide variety of reinvestment activities. • Work witn others to put contaminated sites into productive use for redevelopment. • Identify targeted areas with the greatest need and potential for economic development. • Work with others in community redevelopment planning. • Support solutions to turn around declining neighborhoods. • Support the broadening of economic and housing opportunities In areas of poverty. H Expand life-cycle housing opportunities and housing choices for lower*incoms people throughout the region. Many residents of the region cannot find housing In 'heir neighborhood or city that is suitable for their stage students young couples with gr(” ™ of llfe^Q^Jxample. as students commur llvlnfl^Bjfrom home, as young and single^Maiasifrs^ as couples ^ ^ ^ with gr^n children. tm wm •Pro I Strengthen a sense of community through land use planning and reinforcing the civic Infrastructure. The quality of the region’s civic infrastructure can be strengthened tluough Inclusive partnerships that work to revitalize distressed areas and focus mote attention on land use and development patterns Th® Council will v;ork with others to achieve successes in economic growth, reinvestment, financing sound regional Investment, environmental preservation and Strengthened communities They are accomplished only in partnership with business, local and State government, schools, nonprofit agencies, community groups and others Actions: • Work with local governments to enhance the physical environment of their communities, making them more pedestrian- and transll- orienltd, and creating a community focus • Foster a full range of family and ^ neighborhood activities In lo^ community facilities. ^ • Consider the effect^on local communllle® when^aking policy and facllit^^llrlgdecisions While the majority of the region's residents have good shelter, many others cannot afford housing outside concanlralions of low-cost housing, or they may have to pay too much of their Income for rent. In addition, many older housing units are in need of rehabilitation. Actions: • Work with communities to jointly plan for local and regional housing needs. • Use regional investments and public dollars as an Incentive to expand affordable and life-cycle housing throughout the region. • Target federal nnd state housing programs to expand the provision and rehabilitation of housing. • Target nev; public dollars for rental-assistance housing to areas outside poverty concentrations. Promote citizenship and engagement in regional decision making. ■ Preserve the natural environment and incorporate environmental featurea Into the development and redevelopment of the region. Correcting damage to the environment is less effective and more costly than preventive action. The key is to balance economic growth and environmental qualily-for example, through development projects thot preserve environmental features like wetlands and woodlands by incorporating them Into the project's design. A goal of causing no adverse impact on the water that flows through the metropolitan area would help mobilize efforts to ensure the quality of water leaving th^ region is as good as when it enters the region. Actions. • Protect natural waleicoufses and adjoining land areas • Pu^ue a year-2015 goal of "no adversrimpacr on water quality in the region^ • Coordl{iole the orderly development, use and protection of the Mississippi. Minnesota and St Croix Rivers. % • Fncourage local protection of the region’s rerflaining woodlands and urban forests. • Pfoniolc land use pollclee and planning to prole3 and Improve air quality ^ I Provide fincfficially sound public facilities that support business groXth and overall regional devalopment and revitalization. Public services are needed to support ni^ growth but they must be provl^ cost-effectively and in ways thafhetp contain urban sprawl. Orderly urban and suburban growth gen^ated by the private m|fkitplace needs to occur Mncurrently with the provision of ^gionat facilities like sewers and transportation. The needs of urbanization must bs recondlsd with preserving prime agricultural land and a rumt life style. Innovative community-bated solutions-developed Indh/iduaiiy and jointly by communities to deal with housing needs, environmental protection^ r^edev|i '■ alopoj cofrldoi ..........ProviHd urban-scale dcveld^fneni urban service area. • Retain the current urban service area for the year 2000, verifying land demand and supply. • Work with communities to designate areas tor future urbanization. • Support commercial agnculture, rural centers and general rural use. • Planhighcr-dcnsity development along selected transportation corridors and hubs. • Promolo a flexible "cluster* planning process to resolve common issues and tailor solutions. REGIONAL Bl UENIINI Y. . f • f .* ■ :vl if /■ ! •tI' ■ V- - i.' i ' if . -■ ■ ■ ■ y »■ : . •SI •:' *• '/'t jt . • ; f :ir.r. I ; • ' * ► r I'. i I -■ t'r-r V.. ■ : 4" NV ; ■. i ..m ■r-m .• • A “ SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION t^dsoot: Fall 1994 A Publication of the Sensible Land Use Coalition SPECIAL NOTE: This newsUttcr is norm,illy sent to members only, hours er, u e ,tre semiifji^ this issue to all those on our mailing list. WJ* eneourageyots to call or write us if you are interested tn reeeinng our ne,nletter in the future. See membership infurmatwn on the back oj the October program flyer. U ■ i' *; * i A*; . How Will die Regional Blueprint Impact Development? by Terry Schneider Tlic final draft of the Regumal liluepnut hai been adopted bv die Metropolitan Comitil, and comaiii^ icvcral significam diangcs frtmi earlier drafts. I he most signlfitani change is that neither “Ht)using'* nor die “Blueprint" itself has been elevated to the status of a Meirojxjlitan System. . TTie Blueprint i\oa, ho\s'*vcr place a major cmpluMs on ‘ addressing the regional problem oi concen*ration ol poverty and availability of anbrdabie/life cycle housing. The R/nr/>r/«/includes several l.ug|*,cstions for address ing ilicsc issues including: •• !-• Targeting of public housing funds for "at risk" atcas. •Creation of a "Metropolitan Entciprisc Tund" to raise revenues to address issues of poverty and affordable housing. Aggressive monitoring of communities ro evaluate lliclr |ierfornuncc in addressing regional bousing goals. Equation of local housing performance w hen making discretioiur)' funding decisions. •; The £/tte/n>if appears to indicate that the Metropolitan ' Council will attempt to be more proactive in guiding growth and will make MUSA expansion more diilicult. It docs indicate that die Metropolitan Council will ' make an effort to improve the mcthoJuK>g)’ in . 4* determining available land supply, including more / ' coordination with local communities and working • toward a regional CIS system. * The Blueprint proposes a new concept of a “community ■ impact analysis" to review proposed projects and tlicir impact on comnumities from a “physical, societal and •* . economic jierspcciivc." It will be important to follow . the development of this concept to evaluate whether or ■ I.. not it has the potential to complicate an alre.idy complex process of project approval. 0 f The R/ttcynn/indicates that the Metropolitan Council will be seeking a number of changes to the Metropolitan Land Planning A cl TIic changes arc oriented toward . strengthening the Mctropolitaji CounciPs rule in , . requiring communities to implement their compichensive ! plans. However, anytime the legislature is asked to , amend die Metropolitan land Planning Act it has the V .. . f potential to be more comprehensive. • * *Ihe Blueprint Aso indicates a desire by the Mctro|H>litaii ^ ‘ Council to work with the counties just outside the ’ seven county metro area to limit leap-fiog development into those areas. It will be as important to monitor the devclopmcnr of the "I landbook” which is . supposed to contain the details id how to implement die Blueprint. Terry $(hnfidft u /‘rrsuHmt a//*rojWt DetrL'pftt. Ifu. und4 CiJ) CVitnof ntmhrr $f Minnrunki (600 SjuOr tluy /69, Hmtie 1]}TQ, St. Uuu /’a»f AfiV 5^26. Hmne 545-0503 ) I \\ piif a c^'of theruitBtueprin}^ ^I Jic etroj^Iiun wll be'y Blueprint for a Livable Future by Jim Solcm, Mctropoliuui Omncil The Metropolitan Council Regwn.il Blucprvn provides a new approadi and expanded Itamevsoik for the long- range planning and devclopmeiu .utivitii's for the counul, f )i |«H.al govenimeiits and tor .ill others mtetested in the continued grossth and ilevelopment of the region. Drawing extensively on partnerships and eolialmration. die Blueprint promises .utnms on a broad range of issues; ■ Sttengthen the regional economy by encouraging economic growth, iiitetiutioiial coni|Ktivciicss and job creation. ■ inistcr icinvestment in distressed areas, to produce ness jobs and txx base, rehabilitation of dilapidated housing, and attractive amenities. B C^teatc sttongcr communities, with a sense of place, "neighborhood" ami connection to the teginn .is a whole. M Preserve the natural environment as tlie ic^^on grows. ■ Set directions for orderly growth, supported with cosi-encetivc regional services. ■ Expand alfordable housing choices, especially f«»r people with lower incomes, and life-cycle housing oppotruniiics for all people at various stages of life. Close cooperation with local governments and the private sector will be essential to achieve orderly development and icsolvc iinpottant land use issues, l ot example, the Blueprint calls for: ■ >X*otking jointly with loial gosetiimcms to clarify the legion's land supply and ensure that there is sufficient developable land in all sectors of the metropolitan urban service area. I Using a flex blc "cluster" planning approach to resolve developmem and other issues facing sevei.i! comnumities so they van tailor solutions that fit their needs and region.il objcilives. W'otking with local govcinmenis to develop , wnodcls for existing and new development that promotes community identity and community iiiiet.Ktion. Collaborating svith adjacent counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin on land use and deselopmem issues, including Icapliog development. An important opportunity for a liKal-iegioiial partnership is • expanding airoid.ilslc and life-cycle housing op|Hirtuniiie5 rhroughout the region. Under the Blueprint, ihc Council will expand its technical y V r.»* n» :« - O . . . -S J. i V. • •• , .A .f- assistance to inciease affordable / housing oppotruniiics and will work '. -‘V-. y closely wiih state and federal - ‘ agencies and the private settot in ’ * -f-r marshalling resources that will assist f y! in providing aflordablc and lift' cycle housing. jy. *7 . !‘-.V - Jim Salem, Metropolitan Council Regional * Administrator, formerly Mmnesota Homing Ttnancd Agency Commissioner As a lessard for li>cal housing performance, the Council will give • priority for regional infrastructure investments ami the expenJitute of public dollars to communities that have implemented plans to provide their share of ai!ord.ihlc and lifc-cyclc housing. The Council will also rM.ihlish and use criteria for rcsicwiiig housing elemems ol local comptcheiisivc plans. When communities ^ • icquest a clumgc in the uibaii $crviv.c area boundary, they' w ill need to consider how they have addressed, or intend to address, life-cycle and affurdahlc housing Issues. The Blurprtnt is a beginning, a framework for action. Working together—local communities, the private sector, the Council and others — we can take the next aucial • , V* steps toward a mote livable region. ... ;'yy£]vj^^ By calling die Info^aiipn Une m ■. (l)‘a list of new puWttdotu'iy^l^U.f^^ ' Dau Center. (2) otu^mii^ agenda ii’etiuof the Couii^ udfa.K...,.-... (3) news ^i^t wojnal . ; Council,'amf(4) a of local currendy taking applications for suUl4ix/^jfiio^ TrendWatch: ;v./i./7.a /We/kts Slig/fl Drop in Midwest I lousing Activity aa m ■? nc I m ■s i» I9d M HOUSING TRENDS 1992- 1996 (Single S Mulll-family Homes) ..... 7v:: xr-,‘.vr" ^ -t '< V- tm ira \m tm im ISourc*: Nallonat AMoOMton ot Ham* BuMm M4| - -r-'yu'-'*[:• trfn4 ’4'jhS, u 4n*L'ffJ IKrf*; /ritf. Vfi«n !r,.,Utuy s fjm IfdifU St.\ SSAV* 'fS ’MSO) '' O' <■ »,•' ■ • . . V ' ; , ' •> st * ' ft Asji- ■'M-I'banks to our corporate sponsor, SHAXtROCK DEVEIX)PM£NT, INC., for their help in publishing this issue of Landscape. ' • < v*^. jr The Bear Facts (...Bcarpatfi, that \o V by Barbara Dacy . *■ : .¥ ■'.Jr ■.I'-':;' b-n i ;,!..^!.. •I;?p, '^t'b•lb 4i:yl- V*iV W ‘ r.' :v,’. * iST' tm ■ , j J .‘f , *• >' r h. I '• ■•,-r . j; r -'yara»HIt!* ’■cr,'- -'mm . big'-niSIWl ;• ^.;:. . •••r,;>•.■?: . ■' '■' ••• '•■>■', -r-'. -■Vf>'l!&| : vlf ...- ■ ;•>v1v »*>r ■ / ' « 'C’r: 1.]^ ,' Fsft$ ttmpiUd hy Bdrhjrg Osty, nmmunity dn^lcpmrnt dtrtfUr/pr jhk Citf tfFridUf [6421 -VMimitjiAifnut N F-. FnJUy- New Board of Director Named -i; '■' 1 4 'V‘; A'i- 1 ^» ' ’ ■ / ' David W. la>ng is a Senior I'lanncr with the Metropoliun ' s'fr'; ■ Council’s OfTice ol Local Assistance, Over the past sis years, j .; , *.'he has worked in Twin Cities' regional government at the V ** ♦' 2 ' Metropolitan Council and the Metro|>oliian Waste Control •‘i’ r-> Commission. ’ ; ■Sy'.‘^ r He intends to suppon the spirit and intent of the organixa- '; '■; ^'lion's miul-n. "I would like to further the efforts of the •Cbi*' Sensible Land Use Coalition, as I lielievc they will * '* undoubtedly further the art, science and practice of planning," Ia>ngexplained.r % * : ‘ V -* ' ••j' < ' He is an active memlser of the planning and development i-V'» community, both liKally and nationally having served in • ;\ . • elected and appointed positions in several orgamxations • ' including the American Planning AsscKiaiion and its " ; »•; TMinnesota Chapter and the lincoir Institute of land Pohey Jvi't J'Z>x ♦ Ovrr 120 attmdrA the .' * August program on one , ' ‘ of the hottest tUys of the . ,• summer. i: ' Pictured is d group viewing the 18th griren. • f i ■■ f A 37,000'Square~foot ' ^ Clubhouse, to be open * Vi in the summer of I99(y, / " will be constructed near l ' ' • ■ ■ ' V<* the 18th green (in the • area behind the tour • i- •i group). ^ ■ 4 f Member Surs'e}' Results Positive A total of 37 attendees at the August pn*gram tcsjxm Jed to our survey (23 mcml>cfs and 14 non nienilKTs) I «d!«»svirig arc excerpts summari/ing the results. For a copy of the complete rep«>M. call Valetic VC’illiarns ‘S'*4-3302. /. Rjte the overall bmffiti provii’ed by the CoaiitioH? • - FAccllrnt 23'>t' - Good 73% • Average 4% 2. Rate those benefits that are of value to you: - Programs • Nctsvorking Opportuniiics I^‘!o - Public/Private Osrnp. of Oig. 13'’b - Membership Directory 1 2% > Educational Opportunities 1 1.5 ”i» .Newsletter M.^% • LuruJicon Provided 10% • Real E.state Credits 8% J. Practical application or usefulness of information provided at programs: . Excellent 3(*% - Good 59% • Average 5% . * . Fair 0% '. Poor 0% - 4.-Prefermi meeting times: - • — - Breakfast 22% - Lunih 64% • Dinner 14% 5. U'Tiere do you prefer to meet* • Does not nutter - Southern suburbs - Western sulnirbs • Midway between the T.C.’s • Dowmiown .Minnca|Hslis - Northern suburbs • L^ow’iunwa St. Paul - Fostern suburbs 6. Length of neu-iletter: - Too long 0% - About right 100%' -Too short 0% ' , 7. Content of neunletterl * Excellent 50‘?o - Average 50% - poor 0% 26% .. •; 16% S : 16% • : . »v . V 16% '., ; io% ‘ . • *. : 8% -■/ • 4. >'J.' 6% ,i 2% ' ■ *,.: . b . • rA..0-: . *. *^ •' .* •- s. V' 8. Frequettcy of publication: •=> i.* *‘V ^ * .Too Many 0% i ? >i *!* • . About riitht 88% • * . * ‘'a ’About right 88% • Not enough 12%- VI.- 9. ^hat iUjQ^e/rtVmi can you offer that would help ttl .; / * better terve you* ,'^t ' Keep up the programs. j . * . A stand up mingling/ncrwofking part of the program. . ;» - Don't fix it. ^ ___________ . - ' . / ’«• ' Solicit informaijon from publics^tor mcmKttxaEout projects approved and new regulatory or planning • T* activities. "i Member News . » i ' t '. * AV«» Members sime the Directory was Published ■ OrrO PFD. Mriio Seven Realty 821 nurd Siieet Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: 463-3337 Fax; 437-4M5 S RON I'L l FR-St^N. Peterson I rivironmcntjl Comuliing 3209 West 76th Street. Suiie 207 Ldina.MN 55435 Phone :H3I 8565 Fas: 831 8735 ■ ]ANF:T WII LBSKI. Baumgan Kelly. PA. 1 750 NC'I. 'F«>wcf. 445 Mtiuirjou Siren Sr Paul. MN 55101 Phone 224 3^81 Fat 223 801 ‘» In Memorial ■ I Ml- MAXI II I D. Maxhcld Research (htnip (8/5/94) I -e devclopmrnr corniminirv will riuly nun I cc's energ)' and prulessiortaliini, Maificid foutideu Dcvelopinent Coticepr Curp m 19"'4 whuli stnm evolved into Maifield Rescaicli Ciioiip. Ihc ti>mpjov's teveatcit in the icjI csiarc firld lifljvd drvrlojx-iv tutmiiljir and ijrtv nut comr of rlic I win ( itifv l.ifgcvl linmmg pro|r.ti Membership Campaign *95 ’ Fhc GOOD NEWS is that meml>ership$ will remain the '»... .‘s’ ume as last year at $75 for individual members, $125 for . >• .. public secior/municipality members, and $250 for private * ^.t corjHirate members. f*!» ■ Anolher gotnl news item is that we arc planning to publish » our Member Services Directory earlier in 1995. This means ' . ihar your prompt tesjvonse is rncouraged by January 1. * For those who wish to renew or join now, please refer to the , ► merhisership application on the back of the October program . fim. Ol please call Valerie Wil'iams ai.474-3302.* , Your involvement and your mrmlsersliip keeps our organi/a* , lion viral while helping )xm to grow. ITie Board of Director* i ^ , wish to tiunk you in advance for your support!. ' ' i . < . I nimui \| i.l MU I l\l s I ,ti lbii'4 IV |i,I IS I .|i ii. X timni. Ill .>11 M ’.u V ' O' ^''b. •' 111 I >•;; Milvinill.ib inil'l I*. III. i.>a . ■ >1'. ii. .‘IMi \siiitb,.iiul Ol III du l••ll••‘^lnt hM'.'nI*! i1»> 1 'ill •' tliv lOiiinl*. 'Vv ii'ibli I ii-.i I 11 t .ii!'i'.*t' |'l*lv.i. ’Si |vv.4ki,ii M\sStv| •l•^•»s Mill viilniiiii.il i,i: (■ I .' I II 0(< iO || I nil ii ■'I .iiK *|IK'II0H1. I .ill l*.iil» D.u I I diinr II > vV'MI fir, ■*.:' • ;v: • p' Sponsor Profile: 3200 M*in Snwi, S f 3(ki Cvwjn R.*pk1i. >3401 I1ionr;42l .1300/F4 i 421-1103 ^ ShamrtKk Development, Inc. has pljried over 95 sulHlivmom 1^ ;.. throughout the metro area. Shamruck s tornmiimem to ' architectural control and creative sulHlivnion design has helped to Ik".Vestabliih attractive and desiieable neighborhoods in over 13 i,-” r* j, communities, 33Gth an inventory of over 400 lots at all rimes. , qualified licensed Innlders afspreuate the ahunJance of lots from • U' • { which to ihoose. .ri: SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION Ia<U\epe u fuhlu Ari the 3miif > l^nd f 'it 4 (fm"uinir) efUtd m Jrt<Lp*nru d’yJ rrptUun pftput*njL frs’n lAr fuku 4>sJ pni,4U ir. tcn (K* rniaitn it u fart-nil <11.40.'*1 ntKinif fttui4iu^ 4idp'mtJe ii^enri4 ri-'i i^4i s tU rni.*»'4ff *Af drtelef "imi cf tuiU. 4’ui h‘ter4 ^4i4n.td 4pff*4ity tfW4fJ Hiuft 4*fr‘ff^( Lina Uif. MseLrftntnt snJ tSe entin n<n/ni in .tfinnnau. bilA ipeiiulfcetii #n tte /fcin ( luei metre 4tt4 I'O Box 2H4 I xccisior, MN 55331 -‘>998 (612) 474-3302 Fax 4'*0 6640 ^O' ' 5 pojiACf: 7 .a! ■ .1 03'- Kn\ /=cdiffi Ml . M f ) ( I f n<i5i:7 nc3 ^ 5.994 ' ) Ml' h irl 0 jfrr Mfi Citfj Ijf (If OflM P 0 b'.« % 6d Lriji.t.sl Us'l MN ;b5j5 r w * • w 1^ tIAII 01 Ldepartment of natural resources lOTRO KATERS - 1300 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 WONIWI. 772-7910 October 13, 1994 1 Mr. Mike Geffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Cryotal Bey, Minnesota 55323 RE: LAND USE APPLICATIONS, CITY OP ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Gaffron; I have coonente on the following lend uee application® on the Planning Coeeieaion agenda for 10/17/34. £1 I,avr«ne« and Marilvn Dorr Property. 90Q TOPkawfl RQftd (17": 133.-24K The applicants requeet approval of an average lakeehoro setback variance for construction of a new residence on the property that currently contains a seasonal cabin. There was a question about whether the steep areas near the lakeehore and approximately 200 feet from the lake were official bluffs. We concur with city staff that, based on strict interpretation of the city's ordinance, these steep areas ere not bluffs. We have no cosonent on the average lakeshore setback variance request. However, the city should rsQruire strict adherence to roetrlctione on activities within the **shore impact zone," i.e., prohibition of clearcutting and intensive vegetation cutting, in order to protect the steep area by the lake that would be considered bluff in some communities. /1973. Thomas W. Caahman Property. 15Q9 16QP>. The applicant requests approval of a variance for street and side yard setbacks for a now garage and a bluff setback variance for a deck. We have no objection to the city approving the garage replacement. However, we recommend the city deny the proposed deck addition on the lake side of the house. The existing house Is already right at the top of an official bluff. We would object to any further encroachment on the bluff. It appears that it may be feasible to construct a smaller deck on the east side of the house that would meet the bluff setback. As part of the overall approval, ve would ancourage removal of features ouch as the stone walk and patio block area. r Mr. Mlk« C«ffron October 13# i»»^ Page 3 ▼4. be noted for both of the above variance applicatione that JS/..Id th«t th. .pplleant ha. a -h.avy burd.n of th. .h-M that all th. pr.r.*p>lait.. to th. ^rantind of a?inincr.r. StUf lad. T^l. A bic2^. a varlano. allo«. proparty Slad in a »ann.r forbldd.n by th. ordlnanc.. ahould be advleed of the action taken on the deck in BsSSd^E -v?ff;c"2 sincerely# Ceil Streues Area Hydrologiet CCS c:Lake Minnetonka file 27-133-24 Long Lake file 27*160P -#-1 ■^l<?7(, l>an (^a>y>i>l<^ PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: BAYSIDE HILLS CITY OF ORONO. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN I8SI _______; (ccjjW'i;__liiGsw^.'___ 'j_g£j^ ! esayv !e :w f-APy's X Invoice m. 3M4t I Piece. ;. m SM DoMid P. Gi*)e 111 - Developer U20 East Meviete Blvd. Heyeata. W 55391 PHooe: 475-5375 Prepared by: Cot rveys Coi^iiy. Inc 7501 73rd Avenue Bortb iroablyn Part, m 55420 550-3093 Leoat Description: Ovtiot C. PAlirCRS COCCI, accerdlny U tbe plat on file or of record In tbe office of tbe County Oecorder. Hennepin Connty. Minnesota Total Area - 13.30 Acres Total dry bvildable area cacb tot Averape dry boUdable area lots - 5.70 Acres TopoprapMcel Inforontlon providH by developer All distances are approiiante sublet to final survey or Mider mf direct Reyi stored land Surveyor under tbe laus of tbe S*ate of Minnesota. Dated this 7?nd day of Septeadwr. 1994 Sl9.»d: ^ RayaB^A.ik. Praseb. Minn. Hey. Ho. 5743 \ ' ■ PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: BAYVIEW FARMS 2ND ADDITION ORONO. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN /7 ‘P^ Ow«1o*»r: Ikm Pctcrtmi « - f rroiMrttn lac. 12435 42114 «m. Flymtll. Ml 55441 me*.: 425-5311 CiMiMvr; Bo* PatcriOT 3045 5orM Stum Dri«e MiyitU. Ml 55351 Mww: 475-5317 0«U Fr«par«l - Aagint 25. 1954 Imoice Bs. 35700 r.t. ■». «o.i« Seal* !• lot S«o>voy$ w. ,pw. 7f01 73rd Aw. I. «roo*l»« 2ir». Ml 55425 Mmm: 550-3053 Onlicrt 5. «M Ikrgirat 5. Oltaii 4545 5ayt«4e ioM Orono. Ml OncrlptlM; lot 2. Block 1. BATlin F4IM5 co«iit» of HomwbIii, "i sobjoct to HMMti Of record Orono, M Ooscrldtton; Lot 1. BtocI 1. Uma FAM6 county of MMMOftii. M «*Jcct to Mseaents of rocord. TotolArto 19.8 Acroi Totol Numborof UH 2 Totol Nwmbir of OuMott 4 LofArom Lot 1,8m ( 2.78 Aerott Oyllol A 0.28 Aeroit Oollol 8 0.32 AeroM Outlet C 14 f3 Aeroot Oolinoottd Wotlond 11 Aerott Outlet 0 0.07 Acreot Ut I, Bm.2 i 94 Acrott T09O|rAp8y froa - City of Orono t Aoretoy errtify that this plat ms prepared by ae or under wff direct soperulslon and that I aa a duly reylstered land surveyor under the lasts of the State of Minnesota Dated this ?Sth day of August. 1994 ..£ ol, Rayaond A. Prasch Minnesota Reg. Mo. 6743 Rovisod Oct. 3,1994 Revised Oct 10, I '>^4 Revised Oci 13, *994 ROAD