The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-19-1994 Planning Packet1t 4‘ I ?! !► 'I §® I Ol|| ^-l\A > £; M «— o iT <o a :« li il n I wj i ? I II ^ P I I -1ft n ! I I I I Sa n a I a -Pt I < i I I £ CD n 79 Sa. < B V.n ?cr FT ? Si 5 •a H II w CH 2i ? ? ?| X'5. a is B o« s 3 *-n r S' 5 2a^ s y °h =■$ 3 tr 3 55 KM II <-:;; I s| I I 9 Py •^ I 9 P i cr FT 3 i2 •» ftH t:o rl h ► 'II E I »T r •»I* ii If 01 » 'ff a n 0 'J £ ?'< 73 1 U N rr ••n ??nr •/ a i i 5 5. :? g 9 Jr < Sr S'f )? 0 731 MI ?e 12 U C S' d Ss hI °ri !! If ti I’ f St I f { i “ ?li ^ " I fiI- o X PP'« <2 ?I I r. ;s ? I 5 I I i ? i I ! Iqi ?= 5 I S o ? 0 3 ff 1 *crr R O ■« 3 Pi •5 ^ il • JC I I- i'ifM r? » 3 II c* ■o 3 ?P3 a z III Ii<3 3 o Sc; S C- i a‘= II tt & 2 fl 5 H3 a Itt o H a 8 rj a ila 2. ll 2. t >§ ^1 I i VI ias C7 •fl 5co pip II fl ^1# ”If s? llqS 'IS'S- If 85n S I y ? i -53rt 5r • :b </ ?«««s nJi*:Aip.*- s r DRAFT MINXTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1994 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with Uie tollowing members present: A«. Plaimu'" & Ad,ninis«>or Mictol P. Gaffron. and Reorder Carole Haseman Councilmemlir Gabriel JabK^ur was present. Chair Schroeder called the meetmg to order a 7:01 p.m. (#1) #1937 JACCI J. SEGNER, 3286/3290 NAVARRE L.\NE - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - 7:01 P.M. Chair Schrc«der noted the applicant was not present and stated the matter would be reviewed when applicant arrived. r«t JIKUI I EROY AND WANDA HSCHBACH . 3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE variances - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:02 TO 7:15 P.: I. LeRov and Wanda Fischbach were present. Oatfron eap.ained the ” wmn2r m'me Seline of the lagoon. There is a hardcover ■ area where nonnally 25F. is shown iro'nly 35,000 s.f. This indicates review the lot ^ ' -rcentages need to be recalculated. The existing hardcover a possible error and the hardcover pe g .q Hreo to 3 195 s.f. by removal of now is 3.694 s.f. J"‘*“^V5''o’‘^lbac4 hardcover is 5.031 s.f. which is being rock “'‘ plastic. is l^i„g reduced from 8,800 s.f. or approximately rr.r ^vi^rt^e’cha^^t i^^i ,o. - — la^Tand wSe"t2^o'".?“ 23.9%. Are Utese setbacks and amounts of hardcover acceptable to grant variances? , «„Kiir. JnipreNt There were no comments from the Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public mterest. tnere wer public. Smith voiced concern with the J^ concerns seem to be met. 1 r MfNXTES OF THE OROXO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1994 ZONING FILE #1941 - CONT. It was moved bv Peterson, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend approval of Application #1941 for URov and'wanda Fischbach. 3135 North Shore Drive, for the vananccs as proposed and accepted the hardships stated by applicants, subject to the following conditions: applicants must provide an updated survey, all hardcover removals must be completed prior to tooti^ inspection, erosion controls must be placed along the pond, and mature evergreen trees must be repbnted. Smith asked that a minimum size be designated for replacement trees. Gaftron indicated that could be done and also suggested that the trees be identilicd tor removal. . Ir. Fischbach inquired what needed to be done regarding erosion control. Gaftron explained it would be necessary to install a silt fence during construction. Smith suggested a land^a^ plan and planting schedule be provided. Peterson noted the proposed motion is based tores computed to be in the 44.000 s.f. range. Gaftron said he would meet with Fischbach s architect before sending the application to Council. Chair Schroeder indicated approva is asc on structural coverage being 15% or less of the total lot area. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#4) #1944 BRADLEY AND DINA ETHERINGTON. 4055 ELM STREET - RpEWAL V ARI^VC^ - CONTINTJATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:17 TO 7:35 Bradley and Dina Etherington and Mark Fuller, realtor were present. Gaffron explained the application had previously been tabled to allow applicants additional time "de ^ u^^ suLy and to have lot lines staked. All requirements are met other than lot area for a single family building site. Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. I^nce Wile, 615 Minnetonka Highlands Une e.xpressed concern with a possible dispute over encroachment of a lot line. Chair Schroeder inquired about the location of the lot me. Etherington stated the survey was properly done. lleman and Shirley Laue. 594 P.,rk Une. alaled ihey have hyed “ Some of ihe orieinal pipes marking the lot lines are still m place, fhe recent survey does not cZe do e wLn he constructed a shed on his property, he made sure tt w.|h.n h.s pro^rty h^Lat^s He noted the property to die east had been surveyed vvhjch me. his c^in^r . . Chair Schroeder asked if he would dispute the cuneni survey. Mr. Uue answered affirmative. 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PL.VNMNO COMMISSION MEETING HELD At GUST 15, 1994 ZONING FILE #1944 - CONT. Peterson said the Planning Commission can act on the present sur\ey dated August 4. 1994 unless someone can provide another suney. Mr. Wile noted another survey had been done about two months ago but did not have it available. Chair Schroeder stated even though dwr lot is below the 1 acre minimum, it is consi.stent with developed lots within the wighborhood. Drainage is another issue and any structure that is built should not cause drainage problems for the neighb^^rs. Gatfron said the neighbors cannot dictate what is done but the Planning Commission needs to be reasonable and prudent in addresring the drainage concerns. Shirley Laue. neighbor to the west, stated the propeny is higher than other lots and is concerned with drainage. Chair Schroeder asked that a proper drainage plan be submitted along w ith building plans. Mark Fuller indicated that they would adhere to whatever plans staff and the Ihiblic Works Department recommends. It was moved by Chair Schroeder. seconded by Peterson, to recormnend approval of Application #1944 for Bradley and Dina Etherington. 4055 Elm Street, for renewal of the lot area variance subject to the following conditions; submittal of a surv'ey meeting staff s satistaction, submission of drainaee and grading plans, legal combination of Lots 7, 8 and 9, Minnetonka Summit Park required prior to issuance of building permit and accepted the lot area hardship stated by applicants. Ayes 4, nays 0. Gaffron noted applicants’ plans are to start building this fall and inquired about the grading plan. Chair Schroeder stated grading plans need to be submitted before the matter goes to Council. Lindquist also requested that both the drainage plan and lot line dispute need to be resolved prior to the application being forward to the Council. (#2) #1958 LOUIS OBERHAUSER, 2405 DUNWOODY. 3865/3877 SHORELINE DRIVE -SUBDIVISION OF A REPLAT OF THREE LOTS INTO TWO LOTS - 7:35 P.M. Chair Schroeder noted the applicant was not present and stated the matter would be reviewed at a later time. r MINUTES OF THE ORONO PUANNLNG CONDHSSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1994 (#1) #1937 JACCI J. SEGNER, 32M'3290 NAVARRE LANT - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT lest : rearrangement - Pl^LIC HEARING - 7:36 TO 7:47 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted Jacci Segner was present. Gaffron explained the proposal is for a lot line rearrangement and combination involving Lots 44, 45. 46 and 47. The simple lot line rean meement leaves two lots each with 100’ of width and .5 acre meeting tte requirements. Unique to the parcel is an undeveloped road. According to ti» code, a road must be brmight up to specific standards if more than two resideiKes use the road. Currentlv there are two residences using driveways onto Hillside Place and the addition of two more lots would trigger an upgrade of the road. Applicant Segner owns both residences and has agreed to eliminate the use of both accesses at Hillside Place. Berming, vegetation, or fencing is suggested to eliminate continued use of the driveways. Lots 44 through 47 have been assessed for sewer. Water is not available and City ccxle does not require that water be brought to the properties. Private wells are allowed. It is recommended that building permit^ not be issued until the existing driveway accesses are removed. Drainage and utility easements must be granted. Upon application for a building permit, applicant will f; responsible for $225.00 connection charge for each sewer connection plus $800 SAC charge (1994 rate). Jacci Segner asked about access lor the northerly parcel via an alley off Bay view Place. Gaffron said access could not be addressed at this time and the Public Works Department would need to be involved in making a decision to allow that alternative access. Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. 'Die potential buyers were present and expressed concern with access. It was moved by Smith, seconded by Lindquist to lecommend approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement involving properties at 3286/3290 Navarre Lane subject to the following conditions: building permits will not be issued for new construction until primary access to 3300 Navarre Lane and secondary access to 2260 Bayview Place at Hillside Place are removed; installation of a barrier at Hillside Place of berms or trees and fencing to be approved by staff; and drainage and utility easements to be granted 10’ along exterior lot lines and 5 ’ at each side of shared lot line. Ayes 4. nays 0. Jacci Segner requested that berm not be a requirement because ot potential water runotf problems to the Ro(xl property. MIMTES OF THE ORONO PLANNLNG COMMISSION MEETING HELD ALGtST 15. 1994 (#5) #1948 JOAN M. HARMON. 4100 WATERTO\M^ ROAD - CONDITIONAL ISE PERMIT/VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 7:47 TO 8:30 P.M. The Affidavii of Publication and Ccrtincate of Mailing were noted Joan Harmon and Chris Riits, attorney representing Frank Kokesh were present. Gaffron explained applicant is a ntm-resident and non-owiKr who requests a cotKlitional use permit and variance to run a limited horse operation. Frank Kokesh. the owner of the property, has operated a horse business for several years. In 1985 a conditional use permit granted approval for his horse boarding ami training operation but no renewal has ever been applied for. It is Ms. Harmon ’s intention to board only ten horses owned by five clients and provide riding lessons for only those clients. Qiris Ritts stated Mr. Kokesh ’s son. Dan. and other family members live on or adjacent to the property and all have reason to frequent the site. Frank Kokesh resides on the property approximately six months of the year. The youngest daughter, Suzie, presently resides in the farm house. Peterson asked for clarification of Resolution #1894 referencing condition #5 which states the conditional use permit runs with the property not with the owner. Gattron explained the code was amended in lv86 providing for a conditional use tor stables aral bams, private or public, and for a riding academy use. Since the code change, the owner never applied for a conditional use permit. Peterson noted that if applicant had continued to renew the conditional use permit, there would be no basis for the current request. Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. Farl and Betty Dom. 4045 Watertown Road, recalled a prior incident in which the Dorns applied for a conditional use pemiit to allow for use of their property by a local day care facility. Mr. Kokesh was instrumental in starting a petition in opposition to the project stating they did not want excess traffic in the area. The application was withdrawn when the Council restricted the use to only 20 children which would not have been profitable for the Dorns. In 1985 the Dorns notified the City that Mr. Kokesh was operating a horse training and related business on his property. Eventually Council did grant Mr. Kokesh a conditional use permit for his business. A variance to the code is being requested for the current application which is almost the same as rezoning. Tliis would break down the barrier of commercialism as opposed to conditional use. He sees no need for a code variance if the present operation is trimmed back. The street is dancerous at this time with a 40 mph speed limit and people use it as a short cut. w MINUTES OF THE ORONO n ANMNC COMMISSION MKKTINi; HELD AI GI ST 15, 1994 ZONING FILE #I!M8 - CONT. Chair Schroedcr explained a cixle \ariance is being considered to a level of usage which is less than the previous conditit>nal use had permitted. Randy Weestrand, 525 Orchard Park Road, stated he would not object to limiting the operation to onlv 10 horses. Lindquist asked if other rwn owner conditional use permits had been issued w ithin the City? Gaffron stated he was unaware of any similar stable operation. Smith asked applicant what emergency arrangements would be in place. Joan Harmon explained two people would be hired that would be able to be on the premises w ithin 5 to 10 minutes and also Suzie Kokesh who is knowledgeable would be living at the site. Phone numbers would be posted along with guidelines to follow in emergency situations. Chair Schroeder pointed out the issue of liability regarding owner versus non-owner. Chris Ritts indicated that Mr. Kokesh has a farm liability policy on the property and Ms. Harmon would also need coverage. Peterson stated he is opposed to the application because it goes against city code to allow a non- ownership commercial businesses to operate on anyone s property. Chris Ritts reassured Planning Commission Members that the Kokesh family would still be using the property and be on the premises. Lindquist agreed with Peterson. Chair Schroeder suggested that subdivision be an alternative means to handle this request. He asked Councilmember Jablxvur if there was a precedent for non-owner conditional use pennits. Jabbour stated it is his understanding the conditional use permit is granted to the land not the applicant. He suggested the City Attorney be contacted for his opinion. Chair Schroeder explained that members are in agreement with applicant continuing to operate a limited horse facility but questioned if a conditional use permit can be transferred to a non- owner. Gaffron listed some conditional uses that are permitted within the 2 acre zones - schools, churches, clubs, camps, recreation areas, greenhouses, guest houses, antennas, crop and stock farms, keeping of animals, and stables and bams. For instance, the camp that is operated on Fonkawa Road is owned by a group and listed other examples. Chair Schroeder suggested tabling the application to see if there is precedent of a non-owner operator and that the City Attorney be cv>ntacted for guidance as to what basis can owners give up their right or obligation to operate under a conditional use permit. Chris Ritts stated he would check out legal issues and aiireed to withdraw the application and have the owner resubmit it. MlNin'ES OF THE ORONO PLANMN(i COMMISSION MEETING HELD At GI ST 15, 1994 (#2) #1958 LOt IS OBERIIACSER, 2405 DCNAVOODV, 3865/3877 SHORELINE DR1\ E -SUBDIVISION OF A REPLAT OF THREE LOTS INTO TWO LOTS - PI BLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M. Chair Schroedcr again mited applicant was not present and asked whether there was public interest. An interested paiTV inquired if changing the lot lines would affect the single family dw^elling versus multi-family dwelling such as lownhouses. Gaffron explained in the past a number ot different schemes had been props^sed that included townhouses. The current plan is to create two individual lots, each with a single family residence. Jim Beisc, 2435 Dunwixnly Avenue, expressed curiosity as to the outcome. (#6) #1949 SANFORD ERIKSON, 4455 FOREST LAKE LANDING - VARIANCE PtWJC HEARING - 8:35 TO 8:38 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate ot .Mailing were noted. Sanford Erikson was present. Gaffron explained applicant requests a variance for an average lakeshore setback for constructic of a grade level deck and four season porch. The new addition and deck will not bloc neighbors- views of the lake because of the location and existing screening. No other variances are involved. elevation and no impact would occur to their property. Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. There were no comments from the public. Ii was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Smith to tecommend approval of Application # W9 for Sanford Ertkson, 4455 Forest Lake Landing, for the variance as proposed and accepted the irregular lot hardship stated by applicant. Ayes 4, nays 0. r MIMTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO^L^USSIO^ MEETING i.^LD AUGUST 15, 1994 (r7) #1950 GLEN UPTON, 3685 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:40 TO 8:55 P.M. Tte Affidavit of PublLaiion and Certificate of Mailing w^re noted. Glen Upton was present. Gaffron explained applicant proposes a room addition and attached garage to the existing house which is presently within the 0-75 ’ setback. The existing lakeshore setback for the house is at 31’ with the addition proposed at 42’ and proposed deck at 41’. Hardcover is a concern within the 0-75 ’ setback area with exis ’ing being at 17.8% and the proposal would increase it to 26 7%. No hardcover will be added to the 75-250 ’ area which is now at 0%. Lot coverage by structures exists at 1,208 s.f. or 14.4% where 15% is allowed and 1.876 s.f. or 22.3% is proposed lie pointed out that code allows any lot to havx: up to 1,500 s.t. of lot coverage by structure so that the variance is not from 15% but from 1.500 s.f. Actually it amounts to a 376 s.f. variancs. No side or street setback variances are necessary. Lindquist inquired if the vacated county road was part of the propeny. Gaffron said it was m easement for driveway purposes serving neighboring propenies and the casement cannot be credited toward lot area. Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. John Erickson, 1620 Shadywood, does not agree with letting owners encroach further into the lakeshore setback area. He referred to an incident in which he was denied permission to repair a pagoda on his property because it was located within the 0-75’ setback area. He commented eservone should be treated the same. Lindquist felt tlie proposed improvement is too ambitious for the lot. Chair Schroeder also agreed that the lot cannot take additional hardcover. Glen Upton asked if he could receive credit for the land across the road. Peterson <^xplained there is no problem with the lot area coverage but the concern is the hardcoverjssue. G en Upton expressed displeasure with the fact that he has more land than his neighbors but Lhc, Planning Commission will not allow him to improve his propert)'. It was moved bv Peterson, seconded by Schroeder to recommend denial of Appl^'ation #1950 for Glen Upton.'3685 Notth Shore Drive, for the variances as proposed. Schroeder noted this matter would be placed on the City Council agenda for the September U. 1994 meeting. 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1994 (#8) #1951 KENDRICK MELROSE, 50 CRISTOFORI CIRCLE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:55 TO 9:05 P.M. The Atfidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Kendrick Melrose and Bruce Bren, his contractor, were present. Gaffron explained Crbtofori Woods is a recent PRD three lot subdivision. In 1992 a variance was granted the previous owner to allow structure to be placed 75' from the street line rather than the required 100’. The current owner proposes to e.xpand the first floor family rtx>m and lower level exercise room which improvements require a side setback variance of 18.6’ into the required 50’ side yard. Topography has placed severe limits on the building site and this is the only location for the addition. The improvement would not be visible to the property to the south because of extensive vegetation. Kendrick Melrose pointed out he is not the original owner. When he bought the home, it was always his intention to have a family room. The lot is 23 acres but approximately 22 acres are wetlands or steep slopes unusable for building. Building alternatives to the east would encroach the front lot line and the severe grade would create a roof line problem. Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. There were no comments from the public. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Scluoeder to recommend approval of Application #1951 for Kendrick Melrose. 50 Cristofori Circle, for the variance as proposed and accepted the hardships slated by applicant. Smith suggested no further encroachment to the property in the future. Peterson also agreed as the home w as originally built with a view of the wetlands. Ayes 4. nays 0. (#2) #1958 LOUIS OBERHAUSER, 2405 DUNWOODY, 3865/3877 SHORELINE DRIVE -SUBDIVISION OF A REPLAT OF THREE LOTS INTO TWO LOTS - 9:05 P.M. Chair Schroeder asked if there was any representation for the Oberhauser application? No one appeared. It was moved by Schroeder. seconded by Peterson to table this application until the September 19, 1994 Planning Commission meeting for lack of representation. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#9) #1952 CHRISTINE FREEMAN, 2240 SHADYWOOD ROAD - AMENDED VARIANCE APPLICANT - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:07 TO 9:27 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Christine Freeman and Blake Stranz, contractor, were present. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1994 ZONING RLE #1952 - CONT. Gaffron explained in Februar> of 1994 the City approved a side setback variance for an addition to the west side of the existing residence subject to meeting hardcover limits. In spring when the snow melted, it was noted that a compacted rock driveway used for parking had not been taken into consideration for the hardcover calculations which puts applicant over the 25% requirement. Applicant now requests to keep a significant amount of the driveway. The overage amounts to approximately 1,850 s.f. Applicant suggests removal of plastic but do^^s not want to lose the rock as it is needed tor safety aspects of having it as a parking space. It does allow additional cars to be parked off the street. Christine Freeman explained she has given a friend permission to park a car on her premises for the summer. It is usually not used for that purpose but she does use it to park her boat trailer. It also provides parking space for repairmen. Chair Schroeder asked how long the rock had been there? Christine Freeman stated 10 years and indicated she would have a problem removing it as she needs access to her house and grass would probably not grow in that area because of runoff. Blake Stranz commented another issue is the limited space in front of the garage itself and this provides secondary safe parking for house guests. Chair Schroeder said a car could be parked in front of the garage and another in front of the gravel drive for use by house guests. Christine Freeman said in the winter time the area is not cleaned out. Smith felt reductions could be made in the area between the garage and the house. Christine Freeman said it would be difficult to back or swing around a car or trailer without that space. Because of safety reasons, she needs to back into her garage. Chair Sclu’oeder suggested that the area behind the garage be removed. He commented approval for her addition last winter would probably not have taken place without the tradeoff of hardcover. Gaffron requested that staff oe given definite direction. He noted there is a question of hardcover that is driven on versus hardcover that is not. There is a fine line between what is merely "landscaping" and what is compacted "driven on" hardcover. Chair Schroeder indicated he has no problem with the driveway area to the south because of safety reasons. The other area could be removed. Christine Freeman stated all plastic would be removed per the previous variance. Gaffron suggested removal of all riKk in the area along the northwest side of sidewalk and grass or bushes be used as a replacement. It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Lindquist to recommend approval of Application #1952 for Christine Freeman, 2240 Shadywood Road, noting that hardcover behind the garage and northwest of sidewalk be removed except for 3 ’ strip adjacent to garage for firewood storage as discussed and accep'ed the hardships stated by applicant. Ayes 4, nays 0. MESXTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1994 (#10) #1953 WILLIAM ALLEN, 3475 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:28 TO 9:47 P.M. The Affdavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Phillip Payne, contractor for the home owner, was present. Gaffron explained the request is for a side setback and lot coverage variance to construct an addition plus a deck to the rear of the house. There is also a request for a variance to the required 10 ’ setback between the buildings. The 1' overhang will result in a separation setback of less than 3 ’ requiring special fire wall construction. According to Section 10.04, Subd. 14 (C) regarding structural lot coverage there is an exception which states "Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least 1.500 s.f. of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures." The proposal is for 1,311.6 s.f. which is less than 1,500 s.f.; thus the lot coverage variance is not needed. He also is allowed 35% hardcover and only 31.7%' is proposed so hardcover is not an issue. A side setback variance is needed along the west side. Chair Schroeder noted the hardship statement submitted by applicant. He asked how separation setback issues had been handled in the past? Gaffron explained fire code issues can probably be addressed by installation of a fire wall but there may not be sufficient access for emergency vehicles to the rear of the property. Peterson felt the addition to the deck closes off the only means for emergency vehicles to access the property and the fire chief should be consulted for an opinion. Gaffron stated additional information is needed for height and location of the fence and adjacent houses. Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. There were no comments from the public. Phillip Payne indicated he would go along with whatever the fire chief allows. The west side of the deck could be moved in to 10 ’. Chair Schroeder said that would not solve the problem. Peterson requested an updated survey. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Peterson, to table Application #1953 lor William Allen, 3475 Livingston Avenue, as Planning Commission wants fimher information from the fire department and to allow applicant time to provide an updated survey showing as-built garage location. Ayes 4, nays 0. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGl’ST 15. 1994 (#11) #1954 LARRV ELSEN, 2879 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 9:53 TO 10:12 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Larry El sen was present. Gaffron explained in July of 1993 applicant received variance approvals for additions to his property. Because of hardcover excesses, applicant was asked to remove a shed. During the removal applicant found the existing privacy fence along the west/public access side to be in poor condition and replaced it without a permit. The new fence is within the same location except for a 5’ section that has been installed parallel to the shoreline. Lawrence Elsen presented photos of the fence both before and after the construction. He considered the fence to be a safety hazard in its previous condition. Vines and plantings have been planted on both sides of the fence. Gaffron noted that the code does not allow fences within the 0-75’ setback area. If the fence is allowed to remain, the reasons need to be made clear. Lawrence Elsen indicated he did not know a permit was needed for a fence. Smith felt plantings could have been a suitable replacement. Chair Schroeder said he was in agreement with the fence particularly next to a public access which prevents people from trespassing. Lawrence Elsen expressed concern regarding children getting hurt on his property. He tries to maintain the area and has been a "good neighbor" to the beach. A neishbor commented bow heavily used the beach is along his and Lawrence Elsen s property. The City has not maintained the area. Lawrence Elsen suggested the chain be dropped in the winter time to prevent snowmobilers from being hurt. To get around the chain, snowm.obilers trespass on his property. Discussion ensued regarding the section of the fence parallel to the lake. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Schnx'der to recommend approval of Application #1954 for Lawrence D. Elsen. 2879 Casco Point Road, for an after-the-fact variance to the installation of a fence for the portion parallel to Carman Street but the section parallel to the shoreline must be removed and accepted the hardships stated by applicant. Ayes 4. nays 0. 12 MEVITES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ALGLST 15, 1994 (#12) #1955 ANDREW J. MCDER.M01T HI, 2702 WALTERS PORT LANE VARIANCE - PI BLIC HEARING - 10:12 TO 10:17 P.M. The AfTiUavit of Publication aai Certiftcaic of Mailing were noted. Andrew McDermott III was present Gaffron explained in May of 1991 applicant received approval for variances to construct a three- season porch, bathrcK>m addition and deck;walkway. At this time applicant is proposing to constmet a screen porch above a portion of the existing deck which would encroach into the required 35 ’ street yard by T. Andrew McDermott stated the side deck along with other renovations to the house had ^n done in 1983 which plans had been approved by the City at that time. Perhaps the City did not realize it was T too close to the road. The improvement wUl not make it appear any closer to the street yard. Chair SchrocUer asked ^^helher there was public imercsi. There were no conuncius from the public. It was moved bv Smith, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1955 for Andrew J. McDermott III, 2702 Walters Port Une, for the 1 ’ variance as proposed. Ayes 4, navs 0. (#13) #1956 TOM AND CHRIS SMltJA, 4040 WATERTOWN ROAD - VARIANCES - PL’BLIC HEARING - 10:17 TO 10:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Cenificate of Mailing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Smieja were present. Giftron ernlaincd applicanl proposes a 26')t43' addition to ihe east side and a 16 xl4 addition m ^ "es^^ide of ife existing house. Because of the uniqueness of the lot. the addit.ons require “sWe stLt setback variance and a side setback variance. Orchard Park Road is considered me ^ron^^^and Watertown Road is ihe side yard. The City Attorney is being consulted lor a clarin'calion of the code which does no. seem to fit Orono's rural setback requires 50' and proposed is at 45' and the existing ,s 42 _ nt^i^h is 100’ and 38 ’ is being proposed for the principal structure and 25 for the three season jx . NO Trea t rYan^eTs required. The additions do not change me sire for sepiic use bu. the existing and future septic area need to he protected. MCSXTES OF THE ORONO PLANMNC C0>DIISS10N MEETINCi HEED ALOtST 15. 1994 ZONING FaE #1956 - CONT. Ti>m Smicja stated it is their imemion to tear down the okl garage next to the rear lot line setbacks with conditions that the septic areas be fenced off pnor to constnictum. ® garage and noted the sighting problem at intersection of Watertown Road. Ayes 4. nays 0. PLAN^^LNG COMMISSION COMMENTS (#14) REPORT BY PLANTSLNG COSLMISSION REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETLNG OF AUGUST 8, 1994 Linduuisi allended ihe CouncU meciing and reported ihai Council gave Stoddard approval to conitlt to the existtng sewer unit instead of a separate connection I le noted that the appltcatton for Sailor’s World was continued as applicant was not present. (#15) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Chair Schroeder noted the B-2 issue is still being reviewed by the City Attorney. Gattron stat^ a date needs to be set for a meeting. Comments have been received horn the attorney but he did not give specific direction. Chair Schroeder commented that the B-2 Code was revised to provide for extra conditional uses. Councilmember Jabbour spoke on B-^ code issues regar mg Lrinas. After discussion, it was decided to set a date tor the Planning Commission to meet somannas the B-2 matter could be moved on to Council. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (#16) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE JULY 18, 1994 MEETLNG It was moved by Schroeder. seconded by Lindquist to approve the July 18. 1994 Planning Commission Minutes as submitted. Ayes 4. nays 0. (#17) REPRESENTATIVE TO THE COUNCIL MEETING Chair Schroeder volunteered to attend the Sepiember 12. 1994 Council meeting. •r .• « thif u iinihle to attend the September 19, 1994 Plarming Lindquist gave notification that he is unanie lo autuu t Commission meeting. J MIM.TTES OF THE ORONO PLANNLNG COMMISSION MEETTNC HELD ALGIST 15, 1994 (#18) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE FOR B-2 WORK SESSION Chair SchAjedcr noccd a date will scheduled ADJOLTLNMENT Chair Schroeder adjourned the regular Planning Commission meeting at 10:45 p.m Charles Schroeder, Chair Person J r' / TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, Citv Administrator KR()M: DATE: Michael P Gaftron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator September 12, 1994 SUBJECT; #1800 Michael Plank. 4U5'4145 Watertown Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rcatrangement - Renewal of 2/16/93 Approval - Request for Continuation to October 17ih Meeting The original Planning Commission recommendation for approval for this lot line rearrangement expired on Februan 16, 1994. A review of il»r file suggests that ilw "front/back lot" ordinance (flag lots) adopted in December 1993 may have an impact on the viability of this and any future subdivision of the property. Applicant ’s surveyor has itKlicated and staff concurs that this public hearing be continued to the October 17th meeting to give applicant lime to further review the proposal with staff. Staff Kecommendation It would be appropriate for Planning Commission to table this request, continue the public hearing to October 17ih and accept no public comment at the September 19th meeting. r TO; FROM: DATE: c?- Chair Schrvicdcr and On>nt) Planning Commission Members Ron Moone, City Adnunistrator Michael P Gaffron. Asst. Planning dk Zoning Administrator Sejaember 15, 1994 SUBJECT: #1914 Tim and Bcih Traff-Thomas and Phyllis Colwell, 2640 North Shore Drive - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Revision - Public Hearing AppDcatioo: Revision of proposed division/'combination to result in two tax parcels where four tax parcels currently exist. Note: Planning Commission rccommeraJcd approval of a lot line rearrangenKnt for this property in April 1994. Prior to this being presented to Cwncil, the applicants requested that the proposal be revised slightly, and staff has republished and renoiitled for a public hearing on a revised plan at your September 19th meeting. List of Exhibits A - Revised Plan B - Original Plan/Revised Plan Comparison C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 4/20/94 D - Planning Commission Minutes 4/18/94 H - Memo and Exhibits of 4/13/94 Pertinent Facts Traff Final Parcel (A) Colwell Final Parcel (B) 3.51 ac. 15.98 ac. 19.49 ac. (3.4 ac. dry) (±9 ac. dry) Additional Discussion The memo of April 13, 1994 has been included in order to refresh your memories of this property. Brielly, the Traffs and the Colwells have come to a (revised) agreement where Trait will acquire the westerly portion of existing vacant Lot 3, all of Ouiloi A, and a small triangular portion of U)i 3 near County Road 51. Colwell will retain the easterly portion of Lot 3. Each propertv ow ner w ill be required to combine the respective parcels, leaving Traff with 3 1/2 acres and Colwell with 16 acres. Of course, each property owner will be required to legally combine their holdings into -a single tax parcel, leaving no substandard parcels outstanding. The proposed lot line rearrangement will have no impact on existing or future septic systems. A significant impact is that Lot 3 no longer will exist as a building lot. The buildability of Lot 3 was negatively affected by the new Shoreland Regulations adopted by the City m 1992. r Zoning File #1914 Sefrtember 15, 1994 Pace 2 The City will require granting of draining and utility easetiKius 5* cither side of the new div iding line between the propertks. The proposal docs not specify a request to vacate drainage and utility casciitt^nts along existing propeny lines. Staff has no kixmledge of wK*ther certain of those casenams contain existing utilities. Any future application to vacate those easements would require confirmation of their current use. Conceptually, however, the City would have no objection to such a vacation. The Traff residence will continue to access to North Shore Drive. The Colwell residence will continue to access to Old Cry stal Bay Road. Staff Recommendation The proposed lot line rearrangement appears to meet all requirements of the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zone. Suff recommends approval of the revised proposal for subdivision of a lot line rearrangement. r l^U< C. cm' OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 CnstaJ Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1914 NOTICE OF PL.ANMNG COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 4/20 94 TO:Tim and Beth Trail 2640 North Shore Drive Wavzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO:Thomas & Phyllis Colwell 1130 Old Crysul Bay Road South Wayzau, MN 5539*1 TYPE OF APnJCATION:Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 4/18/94 VOTE:6 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the follov%ing: Approval subject to comlitions mMed beU>w NOTES AM) SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Appn)va! of proposed lot line rearrangement as proposed. Your surveyor!s) should center with the County Surveyors Office and/or Torrens Office to determine whether they will allow this as a metes-and-btvunds divisioa'^combinalion or if they will require a plat. Procedurally: • If this is allowed as a metes and bounds division/combination, provide a survey identifying the various parcels and their legal descriptions (see attached sample). Provide 3 copies of drainage and utility easement 5’ either side of new lot line (standard format attached). Provide signature lines for all property owners with an interest in the subject property (spouses, etc.; signature lines must be signed), the Mayor, City Clerk, and date of final approval. Submit 3 copies of this survey for placement on Council agenda for tinal action. Upon final Council action, applicants must complete legal combination fonns at the City Offices. The City Attorney will file the subdivision/combination with the County. Applicants are responsible for revising their deeds to contirm with the final descriptions. OR If this is required by County Surveyor or Torrens Office to be a plat, please advise staff immediately for placement on the May 9th Council agenda tor preliminarv plat approval. A preliminary plat approval resolution would then be adopted on May 9th detailing your final plat approval procedures. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the May 9ih meeting is May 2, 1994. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, Uiey are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ch " -i T • • ’ .: «.Mv,--------- • - - *.-• ».«l ; --.* .c.e % O /=i. ^ 3. J28 ik4 1I)fiw,. .,1(/! 64 U--- i ■D 3D O ■D O ^ H 5:0 ') isn ■ c/) “ DO ®>> o !3T1 < 3-Tlco 5 D _ 2 ^ "n O 30 h=^ G Ki. s: lA V rs>_ mm MG>ri To:Cluimun Schroedcr ami Orom) Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Michael P. Gaffn'n. As<iistaiM Planning & Zoning Administrator Date:April 13. 1994 Subject:#1914 Tim and Beth Traft/Thomas and Phyllis Colwell. 2640 North Shore Drive Subdivision of a lx)t Line Rearrangement - Pubitc Hearing Application: Division/combination to result in two tax parcels where hxir tax parcels currently exist List of Exhibits A B C D E Application Plat Map Property Owners' List Survey Area Calculation Discussion Approximately 5 years ago. the Colwells purchased the property at 2640 North Shore Drive and proceeded to plat it into three 2+ acre lots. On Lot 1 they built a new residence in which they now live. Lot 2 contains an existing residence in which the Traff s now live. Lot 3 is a currentlv vacant 2 acre lot which abuts the shoreline of French Lake and which would not be buildable without variances to the required 150' septic system and structure setbacks from the OHW The Colwells currently own Lot 3. Lots 2 and 3 are serxed by a private driveway outlot accessinc North Shore Drive. Ihe Colwells have agreed to sell the westerly half of Lot 3 and the driveway outlof to the Tralfs. Additionally, a 30' strip of Traffs' Lot 2 will be transferred to the Colwells. The nature of these transfers would leave substandard parcels and therefore the City will, as is alw’ays the case in such lot line rearrangements, require that all subsequent parcels be legally combined for tax purposes by the respective owners. The Traff parcels when combined will total 3.68 acres of dry land. The Colwell parcels when cimibined will total appro.ximately 9 acres of dry land and 7 acres of wetland. Statt has not attempted to determine tlie future subdividability ol the Colwell parcel, however it should be noted that the 150' required setback from the OHW of French Lake^outh basin would be a significant limiting factor. j 4 Zoning Fik i 1914 April 13. 1994 Page 2 Both the Traff and Colwell rcskknccs arc currently served with septic systems, although Colwells' current Lot 1 is within the MUSA boundary and has a sewer stub on County Road 84 approximately 900 ’ west of their existing residence Plat vs. Division/Combinatioii? The subdivision code gives no clear direction wl^thcr this lot lira rearrangeitKnt should be structured as the divisioa'combination proposed or wtethcr it should constitute a replat into two lots. It is left to tla discretion of tlK applicants and the advice of their surveyor as well as requiremems of the County Surveyor’s Office as to which methixl will be acceptable. Additional Information TIk proposed lot line rearrangement has no impact on existing or future septic systems. The proposed lot line rearrangement includes granting drainage and utility casements 5* either side of the new dividing line between the propenies. The proposal di^s not specify a request to vacate drainage ami utility easements along existing propeny lines. Staff has no knowledge of whether certain of those easements contain existing utilities. Any future application to vacate those easements would require confinnation of their current use. Conceptually, however, the City would have m> objection to such a vacation. (It will be noted that the conservation and flow age easement tor French Lake w etlands, while showm on the original plat as drainage and utility easements, could not be vacated). The proposed lot line rearrangement has no impact on setbacks for existing structures. The Traff residence will continue to access onto North Shore Drive. The Colwell residence will continue to access onto Old Crystal Bay Road. Staff Recommendation The proposed lot line rearrangement appears to meet all requirements of the RR-1 B Single Family Rural Residential Zone. Staff recommends approval under either of the following options to be chosen by the applicants: A. lx*gal combination of all resultant parcels as a simple lot line rearrangement; or B. Replat into two separate lots. CITY OF OROHO - SUBDIVISIOM APPLICATJ^J* 0 V**"^ ^ PROPERTT LOCATION \ Site *ddr>.» ^C-f ^ CJc.^t&^ _ _ _ _ Y Property Identification Nunber (P.I.D.) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Please checX ono - Property _ _ abstract or _ _ _ torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLlCAilT 3 Phone (hone)^________^ ^ Nane ^i Phene (work) _ >dd».s7 zip:_£v2i; __ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- OMHES (if different than applicant) Phone (hone) Nane "TTc i>ig4 ^ ^ Pl\^Jl>S (J(>!Phone (work) Address: /u'^ylW^T 2ip: 3fZZ (attach list if more than on^ 7 EXISTING LAND HSB ^ Nxmber of Tax Parcels JP_ _ _ _ Development Size Acres Dry Land _ _ _ _Acres Wet Land V.4 Acres Total, all parcels ,j. wa I * w'l u'NwAi-*>e r,* ^**rr r»rrT?’^r Present Use (check) ^ Residential; no. of uni;t8^,t;v:^_.ri_:r^ Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _^ . ^ Present Zoning District______________ \EC£1PhihA^iK YOU ^vCjO CvOi ROl Til - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PROPOSAL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Division for Tax Purposes _ _ _^ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units Hew Units _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Total Units Proposed Gross Density: _ _ _ _ __ Units per - - Acres Minimum Lot Size: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check) _ _ _ _.. ^ »_ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r MlHIiroH MATERIAL WECBSSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMIHARY APPI.ICATICR 1. Completed Application Fora 2 Preliminary Flat information on Certificate of Survey. 3* Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). , i 4. .se4. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list or any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date- -._ _ _ _ _ _ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is c<xnplete. Zoning Official’s Signature^_______________________________ Date____________ PEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, H * III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I 4 II Subdivision) Preliminary Rev’iew (Class III 4 all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00 150.00 100.00 Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional establishe y or Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature _ _ Applicant must have all au^ittals into the City “ da^s i.®£ore the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission ee 9 ooheduled third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. f unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrang^ents to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise che Building 6 Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. y- // // • I ■r V .-V* ♦ • • WH UTt U/tt^Pin COUMTVM t9-lir-<S IS 99mtiiM 9L9 etrsTM. ft*y a se M • • f STfXKN«rfi CMC« M/MMtSt t STtXMttm 11S« QLt OrSTAL MT m S MVZATA m SSlAlS§ •^117>fS 14 0M4 •11S9 9L9 OTSTAL MV STMOMAS • A MtyUlS 0 COLMU TMONAS « A MTtLlS • COlWLL t/0 COUCU INDUftTUtS HC IAS N sao ST MKS m B4«l<4l!-Ta»4Tll >» MM i ^ . ■00ns Mwss iMuimroCMMtCS i tlKITTA SCIOiMI CMStn i tlMXTTA ICHOEHI MM NOVm MM nwmu M m n>< MV mm wmn Ml TAMmt f ■ ■ i It tf-n7>tl AC OMS mcs NUATK 8MQRC Ot RttTlANt C MDOOMOUM CT Ai RXirruNC c mdoonqusc CACt NOtm SNQIlC M sssn ^ynmvnn NAHI/AOM . CATSTAL S'.n -'jJ- ^, ’«'!f'" St et-117>n AC 0M7 AOtSt AMWSS AfMSXMB ILXZAMTN L TlAfr IT AL TPWnW TtAfl ICM OLt CCTSTAL tAY n S 4 SSS41 r. • f,* . ^-»:• u- mr XMAOMATIOM STSTin ACTfSTT OWAS LISTM M-llT-TS IS OMTeim ots cirrsTAt t»T w stiHonrr i. nurrTlWmW l TAAfTItM OIS CAYSTAl MT 0 SmrZATA *fl »55*1» t4-llT-ZS 41 MOS •<S4t NOKTM SMOAt M CAAOL 6 CAUJLMM CAAOt A CALIAMAMMR nCRYSTAL MY SSSCSSt tVllT-tS 4t 0004 0A4AS NOATR SAQAC OA J A HtTOCLL A A n NITCKU JtRCS A NXTCMELL CAM NORm SHORI IHI S MAVZATA >01 SSS41 SO 04-iir-ts 4c OCASO NOATA SHOAC M TMQHAS 0 A mrruis 0 COLMIU TNOHAS 0 A ANYUIS 0 CM.HEU t/0 COLMIU XMOUSTRieS I>C 123 N SAO Sr MPLS m 5S491 04-117-23 IS HDATN T L A 1 L TAATT TIMOTHY L A OITM TAATT 2A40 NORTM SHORI m MAVZATA >01 USYLSO 04-117-23 41 OOM 02SA5 tORTR SHORI OR J A T l«AATtM|AUjtrrwn i a toni a nartxmuu2S4S MOATM SAOAI OA HATZATA m nS4130 04-117-2S 4C BMl SB toot %A024SS NORTH SHOAC DA 07MB NMIH SNOOf DO •#1C A LINDCLL a J J Limu J • jtwM i s 0 Jimm . M* J1 X *:!ctAJO A • joonrto j limbcll jam 0 i SAMDOo 0 jiioHi24SS NORTH SMORC OR •IMS NooTo mm m T ■ V'HATZATA >01 SS341 MYZOTA m SiSOl . •».1 ^ I 0 IQLSOM AKA MILSON ZAOl NORTH SMOAC OA MAVZATA M4 SSS41' u:. ■. v: h 9f ♦ .. . . V Vi 1 • / ■ -A ■ V- • V > 4 ■ TOTAL BATCH 001 00014 •* * * ••.f .. •I V; O p* . *I'v > f f * “* ' ot* V t < ’ ^ ^iV' - ^ *<;> r; .A ■ n- --T •• ?' # • tiJL fax TEAltSHlTTAi; TO: riJOH: DATE: - f/Tjt /r ^ ^A01' ir ^ fti ^ • • OF PAGES IKCUJDIKa THIS C0V2R PAG2: . ^ W MtSf^ r iiSff'/*! Aj^0f JTA^ Jf^/c. yAC^ «K - ^ ^ ^ V* ■ >• I . * ay ‘WAt r//a ' irff„l,c —i£T X—^-/^^a-r/vr/t ---------------------->TA.> /»^r ^ -^^ ~ /5 . « ‘^■'^ = /.JZ ^cAfS <Lar 3 - f,o3 ^<^<sr \ • Oarcor 4 - /'J 40CjffJ Jir^r.XCdCfj * t •• ^\ • •• • - • • I 9 • -; • '• f •K • • • •• • • • • 4»• •«*.t • *^» *»t ’•<> »? * .* J» 4 ^ 4 ^ ^0% r%9^ .-. * J 5. TO:Chair Schroedcr anl Orono Planrang Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator niOM: DATF: Michael P Gaffron, Asst. Planning Zoning Administrator September 15. 1994 Sl'BJtCT: #1967 Robert Olson Donald R. Peterson of K-P Properties Inc. • 4645 Bayside Road • Pretiminaiy’ Subdivision (Class 11) - Pubik; Hearing Application: Proposal parcel. Note: Applicants originally applied for a 7 lot plat including the Irvin Gcffre property at 4665 Bayside. However, as noted in applicants' letter of September 14th, they are requesting to down grade the application to merely splimng off the Olson residence and leaving the remainder of the Olson propertv as Outlet A to be platted later this year. List of Exhibits A - Application D - Original Letter of Request 8/26/94 C - Revised lu.*tter of Request 9/14/94 D - Plat Map E • Property Owners List E - Original Plat Drawing for 6 Total Lots (Fumre Submission) G - Revised Plat Drawings for Creation of 1 Lot Plus Outlet H - Revised Plan with Staff Comment I - City Engineer Comments Regarding Original Proposal Background Staff has been working with Mr. Peterson for a number of months in regards to the platting of Robert Olson ’s 17.5 acres in conjunction with Irvin Geffre’s 3 acres to create an additional 5 building sites. Two primary goals of the City have been to create a roadway system that will lie in with adjacent properties in a logical manner, and providing primary and alternate drainfield sites on each new lot that meet the 6% slope limit for mound systems. The latter has proved challenging, and is still in progress. Due to the developer ’s agreements with the property owners, they will likely be back later this year with a proposal to create 4 new lots instead of 5, but wish to proceed to split off Olson ’s propeny immediately so that it can be sold. Septic Sites for Olson Property Proposed primarv and alternate drainfield sites meeting City requirements have been designated for the Olson propeny. While applicant has not submitted the actual testing report for those sites, the developer ’s site evaluator has been in contact with Steve Weekman during the site r Zoning File #1967 September 15, 1994 Page 2 oaluation process. Since the Olson propem currently has a failing septic system, the primary site will be used immediately and tlK alternate site would remain for ptncntial funirc use. Lot Standards for Existing Residence Please review the proposed single lot division. Exhibit G. In the narrow contc.xt of a single lot subdivision, this lot would require a number of variances to lot staiKlards, i.c.: - Only 187’ of fronuge on Bayside Road. - A 30 ’ setback from^he proposed south lot line which would be considered as a rear lot line, but which becomes a side lot liiw in the context of the larger subdivision. Clearly, this I-lot division only makes sense in the context of the full multi-lot subdivision. Proposed Outlot A Again, in the context of the single lot subdivision, the layout of Outlot A would be illogical. However, it fits together in the context of the complete proposal. If iMt 1 is split off from the rc ainder of the Olson parcel as proposed, and Outlot A is created, what is the down side to the City if the future subdivision for sot. reason is never completed.'. In creating Outlot A, with the very narrow neck at the southeast comer of the Geffre property and leaving 150’ of frontage on Bayside Road, the outlot would not be confonning in lot width as an individual building site. It would certainly be appropriate that the City place specitic restrictions on Outlot A, as follows: 1 Outlot A is created merely for future development, and shall not be used for single family residential purposes until a future plat has been approved by the City. 2. Park dedication fees will be due when Outlot A is platted for future development. 3 Any future planing of Outlot A that does not include the Geffre property must include the'oison property (Lot 1) to result in the Olson property becoming conforming to the lot width, area and setback standards of the RR-IB Zoning District. Proposed Future Access Location It is the developer ’s intent that a new private road be developed with the fumre plat, accessing Bayside Road either at the Olson ’s current driveway location or to the immediate west of the Geffre property (see Exhibit F). Applicant is requested to submit written cont.rmation from Hennepin County DOT that the current driveway locauon would be an acceptable road access location. Zoning Fite #1967 Sqjtcmbcr 15, 1994 Page 3 The general comments by the City Engineer in relation to the origirul multiple lot prc^sal are included for the benefit of the applicant in planning for the future subdivision. Applicant is requested to provide a copy of the agrecn^nt'easemem for roadway purposes over iIk Geffre property, which agreement yields an access corridor of a width suitable for future development of a road outlet. Staff Recommendation Staff reco mmends approval onJy under tlw follow ing conditions: 1. Outlet A is created merely for future development, and shall not be used for single family residential purposes until a future plat has been approved by the City. 2. Park dedication fees will be due when Outlet A is platted for future development. 3. Any future platting of Outlot A that does not include the Geffre property must include the Olson property (Lot 1) to result in the Olson property becoming conforming to the lot width, area and setback standards of the RR-IB Zoning District. 4. The existing failing septic system at 4645 Watertown Road shall be replaced with a conforming system per the requirements of the City code. 5. Variances to lot width aral rear setback granted for l.x3t 1 subject to coming into future conformance when the full plat is completed. 6. Applicant to provide confirmation of Henn DOT access location approval. 1 r MINIMUM MATBRIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 2! P%liminary^piit*infSrrnation on ' {you nust obtain '• c%.rr/nt ^03 Covt cntorthis list A irin^lVd’endusi to this spplication, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Certification by fo. ing Department that Preliminary Plat Application i. Date_____________complete. Zoning Official’s Signature. and water assessments).1 Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer ana ^ter us.e 2. Si^ed certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3, Title opinion. 5! SveTopers Agreement'and Letter of Credit. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is compl Zoning Official’s Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _I - --- --- --—~ FEES SJcetch Plan Review (Class I# IX * III) subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Revi / (Class I 4 II Subdivision) preliminary Review (Class III * all non-residential) $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 25.00/Lot Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal cf Preliminary Subdivision Application 150.00 Renewal of Final subdivision Application_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - -r w riZlaie ro orovide all information required orThe applicant hereby agrees ^ Citv Engineer, City Attorney, requested by the "“ecessar'y to process this application and Planning Commission f established by ordinance, further agrees to pay all additional Properties, ^ ^ __ n — Date 8/26/94 terson, President Owner’s Signature _ _ _—=< ■■■ - - - - - - - - -- Applicant must have alrY'herl^n the review meetings of olease make arrangements to have an unable to attend a scheduled meeting, P advise the Building 6 Zoningauthorized agen. attend in your place and to advise tne Office of this change prior to th^ meeting. Date ^rut’h K-P PROPERTIES, ISC. 12435 42nd Av«, North rU?H>UTH, MS. 55-4 1 August 26, 1994 Jean Rabusth Planning Director City of Oroiio P.O. Rox 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 r t I Dear Ms. Mabuisth: Enclosed is an application of Prell«inary Plat for Lot 1 and Lot 2, Bayview Farvs, which is 4645 and 4665 Bayside Road in Orono. This application is ■ade by K-P Properties, Inc. which is buying all of Lot I, Bayview Farms and Irvin Geffre who is the owner of Lot 2. Bayview Farms is joining in on this application. The Geffre property will have the lot lines re-arranged as a rssult of this plat. We presented two alternate sketch plans to the Planning Commission in June of this year. One showed a road to be built along the Joint property line the property to the west. This alternate has been abandoned because we cannot come to an agreement with the Whites who own this property. The resulting plat will use a roadway which is located on the Olson property and on an easement which was previously given to the Olson's covering an 80 by 80' triangle located on the Southeast corner of the Geffre Property. We intend to deed over to Geffres that portion of the Olson property lying westerly of the new road in consideration for them Joining in on this plat. We will be creating 5 new building lots all of which will meet y'^u» .nee. A Wetland delineation report Is attached and the septic system evaluation will be submitted under separate cover. Please place this Item on your Planning Commission agenda for the September 19, 1994 meeting. You can call me at 476-5317 if you have any questions regarding this application. Sincerely: Donald R. Peterson, President K-P Properties, Inc. K'P Properties. Inc. 12435 42nd Ave North Plymouth. MN 55441 Phone 476-5317 September 14. 1994 Jean Mabusth Planning Director City of Orono P.O Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN. 55323 Dear Ms. Mabusth; On August 26. 1994 K-P Properties. Inc applied for a preliminary plat for subdivision of 4645 and 4665 Bayside Road in Orono. We have been working to obtain roadway to serve this property and to obtain septic sites which will meet Orono’s requirments for this property. It appears that a 6 lot division which creates 5 new building sites on the Olson property. 4645 Bayside. will not allow adequate septic sites. A revision of the subdivision to provide 4 new building sites appears feasible. The owners of 4645 Bayside Road have purchased another home and have a buyer who wants to purchase their existing home, in order to accomodate that sale we are requesting that our preliminary plat application be downgraded to a simple lot division of Lot 1. Block 1. Bayview Farms This will provide one lot fcr the house which will allow the house to be sold. We will retain an easement for access to the remaining property which will be dedicated to Orono if the future platting of the remaining property requires a road lying east of 4665 Bayside Road We are negotiating for a road which would be west of 4665 Bayside but this may take several months / /• Enclosed is a lot survey showing a simple* division of Lot 1, Block 1, Bayside Farms into 2 lots. The location of the possible roadway would be the the area shown as easement. r ky^ ■ ^ 'I / _ Q(a-1 ,'<«»' I I !••« l] I • T ? • t *v*rr 4^ fsrjm / ■•• . r» n____________ mm uTi an3/m MTtm tmV .i. m NMC NMC/AWR eDtcnn tcum wcptuTt iptowotion sv^tthtrv OM«RS LISTM-iir-n n «oos MTsiet m ^ t s wmmaamKTt« • SiaWM tUKlOWI «MS MTSiet *019 fIMlI 9UUH f« USStM M-iir-n ttMMS MTSXM »• S • M M OUOM iOKtT t OiXM fOlt MULMOaO AVf N SM2SS1-1M-2S SS 909S •ATSlOf K9• • M curr taitl • NtVA CWf ««M unXM 10 MPll 9(.*IN m sssst ti Sl-lit-cl IS M99 0QQS9 looms IMASSISNiB Mlttnn CWIR NOMiOMCItS RAINTiaS.eMCR HOKOUCBS C/O CRAIt RMKM 100 LUCt LXNi RXOO: M»U OUXN m Mil* Sl*llO-tS 10 MOS tuct LXNI oioei e N lumTooH t V A HAmmM cmtTxs N mi wow tt LUn iXNt RIOOI HA9LI OLAXN m US59 so ««-117-tl Zt 0091 eolM HOOTN SMOOi 00 H 0*vTo t HMjrt tT ai. rSCMIlCK C MHITI|«X*« OOUiS M•seits m BsmSi oa-117-n »OOOSO AOQOfSS UNASSIGNiB Jla*0« T AOHSTCONB Jf«N T UmSTOOHa ill NORTH im LANi MCM« S9S*0M S1-119>TI SS 0*7t« AATSXBf *9 0 OfTtH ACMIT ITtL IM • MTIA ACHIY ROUrt t MX ow HMLI ALAIN m SSSS9 Si si-iii-tt SS 0010 •00Si A00tf» UNASSieCD XHVIN t MiCSACtL IT AL OUARTO INC liti MMNON n iTOf HALS m SS4«S TOTAL iATCM •ools ■fPORT NO. AlillAil fta 13 .X i: ^Si M-nr-ti XT omt OiiAS iATSXM RO t T I N L CirFRt IRVIN T CfFTAf iiVSIM ROPttAU ALAIN m SS15TSi e«-llT-lS M 0001 •OTIS NORTH ARN LA JIANNE T ARNSTRONB t.i'•; -n'-<SS NORTH ARN LtfCnouno mn sis**Si Sl«ili-IS SS ROOT 04n0 iATSXOff RO L TOeCHST A • IUM«• OUNN t L TOGtRSr «M0 iAVSIOf RO HlALt ALAIN l« S5S59 Si Sl-110*tS SS 0011 ooosi Aoeora unassionio i R LANK A J • RUMUL ' iiuci R LANK SUXTI All SI H JACKSON BLVe CtaCAOO XL A040A hM*c M t • -N a* ^ • #% a) tt'" * ^S V I iu •• i K LI sY T*s*» *i ’ - r M vu'if . i i'* i ‘1^ <A * H*s‘ / Uc f f #1 CJ |;i„. jt.V. ?•••r Sii- 'l‘f ____________I___ %l IK ‘I ' ' Vy ppAr; . 6£^5^17C^ SCALE IN FEET 60 100 < • •« V.*. •■ /fe. • A- \ I SCALE IN FEET 60 100 ♦ « • t • • / ♦ U t \ ‘ I \ i ‘•V-« # ■ i * *1 . • ' ;» H 1. « •t ‘ r m Bonestroo Rosene Andeiiik& Associates Engineers A Architects September V. 19<M ATV nr f jr A*i’-wrvr cixi''*1-'^IT Oa» G -r» ®f ^ • C ^ i. tervM m f n t Cu«L« « t Scopes n O ^ kMnM Conv,«jet ^ wrikfii n • jtw- n «w«t t ^ n*'«« * nrwf n rjMfl O ^'«eu n • ete^ : #wiie« ^ • je"» ^ Suw*attrt ^ Mere • *4er>s0rt n ^ •eof»»^jnr* Pf vi « fma n t Ar^af-vjn ^ • OortMt c jh^jua. % w%a n j Siyrtipi^ n • tiu ^ \|TVi^ M t-^ • C ^ Jt ^ V n • tupjrv n le^ C “ n ki« - n • ^'X»^pr n•ennr Vl^ t MV VMrv * k»V! n A vtor^ n ►jul i 1 j<^''»xw' • ‘ ^ - f Jljp^v' immm n vir« r *n>% n n I e*« 4> . Sk^ n A «—•! e • «3m •€ 1^ f 1M n . tme ^ o n CnM0 enr^ ^ f^ G Heue* ^ jeew* ^ Gunp* ^ C*»jr^ • fnenon teo M Mjri^r V Olt*' ^ vs ^ |->|P^SJA» Mr. Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Building and Zifling Administrator City t>f Orono Pom Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Rc: K-P Propcrtic.s File No. 139-1967 Dear Mike. We have reviewed the preliminary plat and grading plan submitted by K-P Properties. Inc. for Bay-view Farms 2nd Addition. The property is Uvated st>uth of Bayside Road (County Road No. 84) and east of C.S.A.H. No. 19 in the northwest quarter of Section 6. The proposed access l( vation on Bayside Road appear to be adequate, himcver. Hennepin County should review the plans. Ibe platting of a future connection to the adjacent property to the south and west i.s appropriate. The horizontal street alignments arc acceptable. The vertical curves alignments do not appear to meet a 30 MPH design speed as required by City Ctxle. Ihc minimum acceptable length for each of the three vertical curves arc 160, 110 and 180 respectively, starting at the north and moving sriuth. A typical section for the proposed street should be submitted that shows a minimum paved width of 28 feet and a section of 8-inches of class 5. lOO*:^ crushed aggregate base and 3-inches of bituminous pavement. 'Ihc grading plan seems to indicate that an urban section roadway is proposed. If ifiat is the case, a drainage pUin should be submitted to address the runoff. If a rural section roadway is pro|X)sed. the ditches should be at least 2-feet below the edge of the roadway. Tlie grading plan does not .shviw grading of the cul-de-sac nor d(KS It address drainage patterns or erosion control. Silt fence should be installed ak'ng the wetland areas prior to construction. Drainage easements should be shown on any wetland areas and along any proposed drain.igc. routes. The plans should be submitted for review by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Di.strict. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very trulv. BONCSTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. /Jl Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 s Chairman Schaxrder and Orono Planninc Commission Members Ron \!ix>rse, Citv Administrator 0»w Ul s o 10 From: Date: Sub'ect: Michael P. Gaftron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 14, 1994 #1895 Pat Wolfe, 2871 Casco Point Road - VariaiKes - Public Hearing AppUcation: After-the-fact variances for construction of a 10’ x 12’ storage shed located 8’ from the shoreline, (arguably) 3.5' from the side lot line, and constituting 120 s.f. of hardcover in the 0-75' zone where no hardcover is allowed. Pertinent Code Sections/Variance Request 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C) - No structure is allowed less th.in 75’ from shoreline. (Shed is 8’ from shoreline). 2. 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 5 and Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (L) - No hardcover allowed in 0-75’ zone. (Shed constitutes 120-i- s.f. of hardcover). Section 10.55, Subd. 26 - Non-conforming uses. (A shed apparently previously existing at this location was totally removed and replaced with the new shed. This action constituted structural repairs in an amount in excess of 50% of the value of the old shed at the time it became non-confonning . in approximately 1975 when code was adopted). List of Exhibit.s J Application Plat Map Property Owners’ List Letter of Request Letters from Neighbors Elsen and Iverson Surveys: 1) Otto & Associates - Received 7-8-94 2) Otto & Associates - Dated 4-13-94 3) Otto & Associates - Dated 8-22-84 4) Otto & Associates - Dated 3-1-84/10-25-83 5) Kelley & Kelley - Dated 2-1-57 6) Original Plat - Dated 8-1-1879 Hardcover Review by Staff (75-250’ zone) Sketch of Allowable Shed Locations Correspondence • Violation Notice 8-10-93 • Letters 8-12-93. 11-3-93. 1-26-94. 5-4-94, 6-6-94 Non-Conforming Use Section 10.55, Subd. 26 r Zoning File 4fl8^5 .September 14. 1994 Pace 2 Background The applic;ml recenrlv ccwBtructcd a new 10* % 12' storage siwd which was noted by the Impcctions Deparimcm in August 1993. The property owner was advised that such a shed ts not an allowed use and to leave it in its current location would require variances Irvin »lie lakeshore setback and hardcover rcquireir-ni< Mr. Wolfe has acknowledged that the shed is essentially a complete replacement of a shed tnat formerly existed in the same kvation. This is confirmed by the letters Iroin the neighboring property owners However, such total replacement constitutes a violation of the rwn-confomiing use section of the code, which is written with the clear intent that old structuralls unsound buildings near the lakeshore should be removed rather than replaced. (Set Exhibit J). As can be seen from the various items of correspi'ndence. staff has reiterated to the applicaiu that this structure is illegal and must be relocated to a legal kHration on the property, meeting setback and hardcover requirements. Adding to the problem is that the eastern boundary of the property is in question due to lack of detail in the original 1879 plat and due to a legal description that lacks detail In fac*. many surveys of the property have been done through the years, and they arc inconsistent. Tlie most recent survey merely reflects staffs interpretation of what the legal description intended to describe, and which applicant’s surveyor felt had as much justification as any of the previous versions. Problematically, this most recent version, while placing the shed within applicant’s property, results in a significant narrowing of the City s beach right-of-way which could cause significant problems for continued use of the beach. Because of this issue, staff recommends that if Planning Commission finds justification to allow the shed to remain as located, such approval should be conditioned on applicant completing a torrens or 'and registration action to reach a conclusion as u the property line actually is. Statement of Hardsl5i*i Please review applicant’s hardship statement on the application form and his letter of request. Given the relatively clear intent of the municipal code, is there any justification presented that supports the existing shed kK'ation.^ There are other places on the property (see Exhibit H) in which a shed could be legally IiKated. Existing hardcover as calculated bv staff is 24.94% in the 75-250' /.one. There is likely a potential for minor hardcover removals to allow the shed to be relocated without a hardcover variance or w'iih a ve»y minor vari.mce of less than 1 %. Zoning File #1895 September 14. 1994 Page 3 Options fra* fiction 1. -> 3. Recommend approval of setback, hardcover and non-conlorming u« variances lo allow the existing structure to remain, conditioned on af plictnj completing a torrens or registration action. Recommend denial and recommend that applicant remove the otlendir^ structure to a cOTlorming locaiioti. Determine whether hardcover variance in llK 75-^50 zone is appropriate. Table for additioiul infornution. or uiml the lot line is legally established. (Such a process coukl take many montlB; should shed remain in place during that time*) Other. isv r ,4 CltT OF OROHO - VARIANCE APPLICATION f » - *- ; -A •. Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SIOO.OO (no change frca original application) Variance for non confonaing use $200.00 After-the-fact Fees (Double application fee) w a • > w ? ^ . . i * a. •*’ * w • TV: TC “ » • - va _ U i» X t Ite rzH f - r a • e . **wfe»* r « . . .t % r.\M - »• •», awae wwva iv a iw t • , a a ' • PROPERTir INFORMATIOR Site Address iiUl Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) Attach legal description to application if not included on required su^ey. Date Property Acquired i t/>lJ_________(ncnth/year) I (do)(do not) also o%m the ^jaccnt parcels of land. residential _Present use of property; Zonina District: _ _ other(specify)_ APPLICANT N^une Phone (home) Address LWIJ _____ Phone (work) City; Zip: OIWER (if different than applicant)Phone (h Ut-yA. Name Ph me (work) Address:City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Est ated Construction Cost $ /iTOO Describe reqyest in detail; li/vs^ JVj> VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ Lot Area tX^etback s Lot Width Lot Coverage Front _ _ Hardcover _ Side Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSBIP/DESCRIPTIOICOE UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS hardship or practical difficulty and iSCRIPTIORjOE C Describe undoe hard; conditions preventinq compli 1 unusual property (attach additional sheets if necessary) SBQOlUD 80BHITTM.S All of the folloarinq infon—tioo eust be sulmitted by the applicetioo (deadline date in order for yoar application to be coesidered ccsnpletet 1. 2. "-P Conpleted Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you east obtain this list froo Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3,_ _Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide, one (1) copy eH*xll* for reproduction). _ _Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8>i*xll*). €._ _Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 0*j"xll"). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance applicati<»> is not conplete if the above infonsation has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature O.V^GiJ Cate OfiNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga tion and verification of A^is request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all '^dbmittals into the fity offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meetihg. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Ccmmission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office* of this change prior to the meeting. . • * » . a 9 • r S’ GOVT LOT Jam du})i/3 ^nhtf>au(f' cJ4>-/i>a3-3i.-c»/V ' , . ..rW^«lprf uQ\4 "tVifa^ur di^f BUM BBTfMTCBuamTAXPmi:/n-ii7-zs n Mi%AOTMM UmSSlGNCIIMiMMIBXM POtmtlD LAND cm Of OMND iOCAC BOMBINO AiBf A Vl/M ST KID ISMfTIfBOB iODBOHNn HAHITA^AYIBHAMi/ACMBI Si II oonOiiSi AOOMSS UMASSIONIO r H MiABBf B IBB ITtBi TOBB INABBIB I BIBOBAM t?QM IB7i CASCO BOIlCr U MAYZATA »Bi SSSfl\ • m >i» t nm AOM omn WBCt, > TAXBArCBf mm/Msm Si tB-UT-TI II O0S4 Biin CASCO pomt a J P • B MOi.rc J PATBICK MOtri ton Ci«0 POIKf BOMAY2ATA IK iSSfl :k PBOP ABQB OMB MAMB « TAI9ATtB NAM/AOBB f ‘ SB M-llT-n SI BBOr BltlB CASCO BOtMT BO B C PfTIBSQN AMP PiTiBSflM BBTCt t PCTfBSON AND NABt PAT PiTIBSON mf CASCO POINT IK1AJ)I HAYZATA MN SSSfl 4 ‘ s. ^ % PIN COIKTY PBOPfBTY IKOBMAIXOM SYSflN PWPIBTT OKgB ^ LIST IT NO Pl%SS4il PiCi IISB 10-117-11 SI BI97B CASCO POINT W T m MAPPf B IBB LYON TOBB imPPfB I KBOBAil LTOM ibtn casco point BB HAYZATA IK SSSfl SB IO-II7-IS II BBII BBBSB A^QOfSS IffB^IOPOB KIBOPIN lOBMlTlB LAW CXTT OP QBCmPABB%/ISm ST MCB ISATSASB »-ii7-is SI ms tZBPS CA9C0 POINT BB BICBAK B KtSTBOn ITAL BXCHAIIB B KiSTBQN IBBS CASCO PQIMT BB NAYZATA IK USBl SB iB-iir-n SI fss»BIB71 CASCO POINT BBI i I I I ILSIN lAMUNCt B A KATNIBrNf IlSiN IB7B CASCO POINT BQADNAtZATA IK SSIAISB 7B-1I7-XS II BIBIS CASCO POINT BB BO^^NMY C IVfBKN BOSTKABT XVIBSQN ms CKXO POINT BO HAYZATA IK ASSI7 SB IB-I17-IS SI BBA7 BZB4B CASCO POINT BOCHABlfS f HltSQN A HI If CHABUS A lUCV WLSCN IBAB CASCO POINT BB HAYZATA IK Silfl SB lt-ll7-IS II BIBI5 CASCO POINT BB BAVXD J YOBAS A MlfC BAVXB J YOBAS IBIS CA'XO POINT BOAB mrZATA MN SSS91 TOT#^ lATCM BBS BOOll I CfBTXnr THAT TNI FACTS BfPBfSINTIB API AN ACCUBATC AND TBUI IKfPBISINTATXON Of Xh7»KATI0N AS IT APPfABS THIS OATi ON THi BICOBOS Of TNI NCIKCPIN COUNTY KPABTHINT Of PBOPfBrY TAXATION» TO TK KST Of HY ANONLIDGI AND KllEP. t • * ♦ « -f r D XL Ncnrmber 9. 1993 f Mr. Lyk Oman OfTtcial City of Orono Zlio Kclky ParkNkav Oront), MN 55356 Dear Lvle Please atuch this tcti'.r to my applicatton for a buiMing permit and NahanL'c to rebuild the storage shed at my .-^nkncc. As we discussed on the telephone, the builder I hired did niM obtain a building permit and rebuilt the Mcragc shed on the foundation of my former storage shed. There has been a larger structure in this location for an estimated forty plus years and obviously we wtMild like to keep the smaller improved structure ' have had disc and lower back problems for over ten years and the hauling between the house and lakeshorc can be vciy debilitating for This shed is smaller and safer than the old structure which was a safety h;izard and an attractive nuisance for our children and other kids in the ncighborhinxl. They played in and on the old structure which was just waiting for an accident. With the traffic day and night on the abutting public easement we also need this storage shed to secure our possessions. Our neighbors have been very ’ pleased with the new structure as evidence by iheir enclosed letters. Ruthic ant, 1 want to do whatever we can to work w ithin your systen ’ to keep this storage shed in its existing Ux:ation on the old foundation. Please call me at work at 376-7050 or at home at 471-8220 if I can he of anv additional assistance. Sincerely yours. Pat and Ruthie Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata. MN 55391 1 Noveab«r 9, 1993 city Cf Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Orono City Council t Orono Planning Coaaission RE: The Patric Wolfe Residence 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 To Whom It May Concern: It is our understanding, some questions have come up regarding Mr. Wolfe's storage shed. We live next to the Wolfe's at 2879 Casco Point Road and are pleased to see the improvement. The improved shed, now in place, looks great and appears smaller than the previous shed. This structure is definitely an improvement in regards to safety. The last structure was old and appeared structurally unsound. We welcome the improvement and have no problem with it as it is. Yours truly. '/ November 9, 1993 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 ro Whom This Concerns: I am writing this letter to you in regards to an improvement my next door neighbor made to his property at 2871 Casco Point Road. The Wolfes rebuilt a lakeside shed which replaced a deteriorating shed that was an eyesore and a hazard. The roof was rotting and sagged and the door wouldn't shut. Electrically it was unsafe. The new shed is less obtrusive and seems to be smaller in size. This is a pleasing improvement from my viewpoint as a neighbor. Sincerely, Rosemary C. Iversen 2835 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 } .ti ^iil|<pi s? 55 t{ 4 4 U-l j; Vp ?!'- go o , '.I { o»}i* !(!i; .1 ‘ tl W1^ I O S *"0• u* u * ^ ;2 i ic; .1 fs* •‘ ft•8 II rj O El . s5 N «) »0 §r"nm \ 5 \ a« 30 * , 3 5i, •»••*-» n 41 ,■ VI ^ 5 r, y :j § y X *;..su»;s| js;.' ■;‘5j;SS^ ;!S..5i5SS?J 3s- o' ;5j ■; 4>aa*<^o 4 3" - ;*«r o'.' s 2 s •> • ^ ^ W ♦ it O ^ ft 4 M • O (J —.fjuill sahoiij 3" i t, , _ • A • “ ■ <«* n *ft •• •* lUiC: • Hi ^ »* »• »ft «t r) O n 3 C» Oft 3 3 • O • S"* - •« *1 ft »% o r* ^ M r) :t D 3 0 9 ‘•■’SJUoo 3 :<• O > • • 6 •s_c «JO • 0 •* a ft ft 3 ft •I ft o.ii SZr. ^•^o.ft It L> . .0 u r ifi 3 Iftoi V • »• • 3 *- 3 V C »S “•ft- ,. »o ft 2 , lo *02. • « ^ 00 O g'd: 4 r, '• :.* t, • ft o 2 21 O •« • ri 3 •< ,:s*x ft 3 4 ? ft O Ott .. < U • ^ ft I' • •- £si;;=kn2? « ^ C tt n ft • • '■'.irMH h\n^-s ijs .j; ?js. ft .0 ft a ,sH i§u ••"j ss; 3° 2! I'-s** ft ft 3 ft ift o 'i<: vj 2 i I V** y m 1! • 3 fc r>r^ssiUj; s • o r." ^ j 0 s 3s;2-§2on' :•? jUf.sjs?? a l“.;?q' .? “Su,--, ;• 5fH5jj JS ‘J:;S: 8 8 - q ? i ; - - - 8;’^ 8 .■'i: is s I 5"i j/J I * ?-2~ it •■<.” v« j^- 5? •* z?. 2 * ? r * ^• jj • O o. C Q ^•„***-*- ”o "C :r.^u;:aR:s n . . Viife . i _ r ', 'll \ * ^ It »* » R 2-‘8Vir.;;: ■S';,’6 *:?a« :"“:M’s sf, it i " »t * ••^‘ss’’“i'“ • 5 5 .4 •» 7 3^S?aV ^ r» * tl •» ^ 1» 3 * ^ O '« J2.*: ;;?5jrgj ypi-sl :»2 I “;**-5*: «“w s::jr,.%a2„3 jS'.jial:s*n5 r S •.;«»» ;5r.2-st !*h |::iin.7S ss;--!? ‘^5'*2-5° ;-.lf s2^ “‘:5‘ sss -.•** •=>•4 -'fc # • mmiBmara-- - V X V—. W I ir : > V -> =' /i• V 'f * * “* ‘ •» * ‘T * ‘ • / O * i'}'- , * 6 " - • ' r>^ •1^-.. • - V «• *’ * ^»x* %•^ ^ '•: - / m L iV. . - • •• • * «■%»•♦- • .• , sj '.-• ..• • Certlfloat* of Surveyi .We hereby certify that thle le a true and correct plat of a au^ey.vji aurreyv' • Vt’^v-7 X ' ' * ^ V?->/ - ‘J ..V, ' ' ' ^'- ■: V ’ ^#;|:;f-,^LI:t %. _ r* ‘.I. *• ' * 5^,-; >. . •i<.»;- 'r-'': . »>.4 * ' '.V ,•* »*•• ? •* V > L'. • -' >' •> w ill m'-fi r , 5?. ry • ♦ i :‘v.^ tv *1 ^ IV».4 i'^l .il I ^3 • ; ‘ f^-''-'" -f.^ “ V vi^ ? "> >7 »*■ *>-< k > M i-rv** >**‘\«* '. V f*yv^ > rv ’u*v7% • i •*M V'- ':;^’r*' .•yv. s'*. < *'-• * * i^l . f ^ /V »>> V »> -rtb-* {v'-;-'* <’? * .'• f 7i3< T • . n X >;(:••'■ '' v ;<-n- V* v<! A' j/ ^ »/>» r fHv.i ,fi r ■;V • %•^ *'T . ^\*j ,i immSwmuMiI IfV:! m '~-fi i '9 . • 4* ' i • >’•>1V. 1 I ^ -,■V 'V i r . • »' • • ♦ \* I >; ■- ^ ■ : - • ■ f «•>, >.v‘^ :;iV:* « n I ■ * •/ • f •- *s ■";r‘. ^4 w v-Vf'-r.- -TV..' :-r - 1 • V 1 •#>,.« ,- ■ T ■ . •V.-V•Jr .k ■n-,\y --■•>• . ■ • ••‘^ ■ ■ ■‘«- ‘^ . '• V'f’’V'iy Y'«.;’'';.V' V '■/ \ -‘ » \r,« W . .» •< ,.\ V*li . . ■ 14 I ^ x9 ■■ ^ '«. »»»<■» . .4 .. A\ _ .' ,,\K A : .; •' -V •:'* •^4. 4 \» ' '!>■’*>• y»i |« \; ■ 1 If -k • ^ 1^?''' i-;fell- ■ J*v/V(<* fr •»i >? I' , ' * * XV 1 y- J4.Vr.• 4-^ V • V*i>c .*»K k » * ♦.Y Y ! ^im i;-:-- 4 **:• - pY’V • i';ty <:' r\ z,.'- .4' •..[p: Mv'tTJ"‘Vi ik ' xR'i M »li-j ;^vter^i X- : '.’; Ntii 4 ■ 4i V > 4* !•■*« »• f »* (ff'' \ *■ r- . O -?* .' •i.r- •-■«",•! •■>* . •' Z'^v. ■i-i > •I ,• ?:1 *-»\ •> yy' ie'f :5 *^T-». •i.’ Vr'i '*!a4 ■>. •" v■;;v^ • * vv/r>v^^ V/*. •« 4'. ;'4 V i V , • «.*; ‘ »' ■> ' {‘v.f V ‘iVl '.V ,’-V ii :*. -.C .*», **■ ■ K. M. A «... %_l } (iJ't; ;fv'|t >;• I!''’ ■ .i^4 :V'-.v I’^pf.',' .-.jj ...........................fiii-j n , r * ' ‘ ' *^' * - ^ t. .- t' -'Y '• '■ ' ^ it'V 7V^« Afrittfn,>- •I ’■'■••■;. ;■ • .■•■ Vf! .^4'" • •■ . K . . • -f't ‘ > ■ .‘^--»1 W. V . sV-iZ>^’. :' r-.>7 tp ' < • • « ■•' O’* ' ^ > V* '■■•,, ' '■ .:V • '■■ •■ w ■* ■’’ ■■* 'rP.fv* #v ,• IL irii kihVt : 4^' T, /,. . U i> !^U-’ C»2 © /O ^ 3 (2> q}<S.S ’ . .1 ® iwX . . ^ -~ d) 2.5 ,S X S'/, •/_ (pV./'2e,V'. ,Sc4 ,fcA. ® (^5-^/b) - (3- ^= . -. 'C«i>c< ® 20 y 6. ^- -- ® 2L X I i -r u . _, (S? ,2- x/01^2- © T 2- @ /5'X70 0) </2r6> . (2? (T90) V2 2- pV K/c? “ z,. So >^/l H 2- /C^Vcir Ur^!>ZcP^C: (^fi£f>rO' ^7G0 1/.0 ^-7o7S yioi^- --lOlC T Z'dn'^l ^ = tA AH Vo i! fut. \0r\X sMi 7Hr ) f cw r. os. o lA <r •Ta DATE TlKiS Ci X HI I §ox H*o v» 41 3 oo cmr OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO CALLED W SCHEDULED COMPLETED 7^'man. AOOAESS OWNER _ SRlf <g^ CONTft TELEPHONE NO, DESCRIPTION 01 FOOTJNG 02FPAMING 03 NSULATION 04 \^LL SO 05 FINAL 07 DEMO-SITE 07 DEMO-FINAL 09 PLUMBING Rl 10 PLUMBING final 11 mechanical pi 11 mechanical final 2475 WVOOO BURNER FIREPLACE 12 WATER HOOK UP 13 METER SET,TURN ON 14 SEWER HOOK UP 27 SEPTIC MAIN! 15 SEPTIC INSTALL 23 SEPTIC final 19 WELL TEST PUMP 18 EXCAV^RADlNaFlLLING 19 LAKESHOREWr^LANOS 34 TREE removal INSPECTION '^ITprogress 21 COMPLAINT 22 FOLLOW UP OWNOVCONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU-__YES COMMENTS A/(Su; he^ tLU3<jed^ C: WORK SATISFACTORY PROCEED 2 CORRECT WORK A PROCEED 1 CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR RElNSPECTlON BEFORE COVERING D CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN______HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN Z PROJECT COMPLETE r ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY _________TEMPORARY _______permanent X STOP ORDER POSTED CALL INSPECTOR (□ INSPECTION REQUIRED CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS r PHOTO TAKEN CITATION ISSUED Call lor the next inspection 24 hours in advance. 473"7357 Owner/Contractorjtfi^ite:______ ^fUC^Inspector: Vhilt Cppy/lntp«cfor1i Fllg CAnary Copy/SItA N oIica J r Aueust 12, 1993 CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street IWdress; 2750 Kelley Partway Orono VN 55355 Mailing Address. P.O. Bex 66 Cmtal Bay. MN 55323 0C66 that a scorage shed has been built or placed on Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 RE: Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe: It has come to your propeny <^871 Casco Point Road^ This letter is to inform you to meet setbacks and S?: * a1? Sk from the Je and does not allow any hardcover within 75* of the lake. Therefore, the City must require you to ’jj'U°i^s deadline is not approved location or remove “ ^ v™ tave anv'questions or if you have a problem met the Cilv mav mitiate legal action, it >ou nave oi, \ m«ttog tWs'deadiine, please feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official LO/Isv cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building and Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector Telephone (6i:) 473-7357 • FAX 47M510 r CITY of ORONO Municipal OfTices Street Adilress: 2750 Kelley Partoeai Orono, MN 55356 Mulini Mdress: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-C066 November 3, 1993 Mr. Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe: Shed placed on your ;r^plv for a building permit to place the shed Aao™., for ^rr^er lc,al acor,. .f you have arry questions, feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely. (yAvUl^r- Lyre Oman Building Official LO/ch cc:Jeanne A. Mabuslh. BuUding & Zoning Administrator Bruce L. Vang. Field Inspector T.l.pho... (6U) 0066 I 0. 0\CITYofORONO Municipal Offices street Address: 2.’50 Kelley Parltv»3y Orcno. WN 55355 Mailing Address: P 0 Bci 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 January 26, 1994 Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata. MN 55391 Dear Mr. Wolfe: The City is in receipt of the Property Owners List and Plat Map as pan of the required information needed to complete your after-the-fact variance application. As I noted earlier in a phone message, your application is incomplete as we have never received a survey locating all improvements and the subject boathouse on the survey. An earlier sursey by Otto & Associates shows only residence structure and garage. No other improvements are recorded. If your application is*to be complete, the City must have a survey locatmg all improvements including the boathouse structure and a hardcover inventory as stated and shown in the handout information (enclosed is another application form that includes handout information). The boathouse is considered a non-conforming structure as it is located within the 0-75 setback. All non-conforming structures require approval of the City before strucmral repairs can be made. The deadline date for subminals for the February 22nd meeting (Tuesday) is January 28, 1994. Hopefully your surveyor will have completed the updated survey by the deadline. If not, the deadline for the March 21st meeting of the Planning Commission would be February 25th. The City must be in receipt of a complete application by the March meeting of the Planning Commission. As we are dealing with an after-the-fact application, this matter must be resolved as soon as possible. Please conmct my office if you have any questions penaining to the directives noted above or if you will have difficulty meeting the deadline of March meeting. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabustli Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/lsv Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 F 66 ^*£sbo5 Mav 4, 1994 CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address; 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55355 Mailing Address.- P 0. Bc< 66 Crystal Bay. VN 55323-0066 Mr. Patrick Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 Re: Zoning Application (t1895 Dear Mr. Wolfe: I have completed a preliminarv ’ review of your after-the-fact application for variances to construct an accessory structure (10 ’xl2 ’ shed) on your property. The certificate of survey by Otto Associates which you provided contains a wealth of information which leads me to make the following comments: • The survey is extremely misleading, shewing a dark line boundary that does not match the legal boundary’ of your property. No addendum was provided by you or your surveyor to e.xplain the format of this survey. • The shed is clearly not within your property boundaries, but within the right-of- way of Carman Avenue. • The survey suggests a "proposed" change to your legal description which would place the shed approximately 4 ’ within your property. However, you have not applied for a vacation of a portion ot Carman Avenue, and if you did so, the City would undoubtedly deny such a vacation given the DNR’s consistent opposition to such proposals which reduce public access to lakes, and given the City s use of the right-of-way as a public beach area. • A site inspection reveals that the shed is approximately 8 ’ from the normal shoreline (not 12 ’-14 ’ as survey shows), and obviously within 75’ of the lake where no structures or hardcover are allowed. Your surveyor did not identify the 929.4 ’ elevation contour which is required by the City for all surveys abutting Lake Minnetonka. • The survey shows and site inspection verifies that your recent landscaping has encroached onto the 60’ City right-of-way by as much as 20’. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX t73-«510 ■ ■..nrf..*—. ^ —.... r a''O' ' o - H A -* ?* ■f p '/ June 6, 1994 CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Park^ayi OroiK). VN 55356 Mjdinf Address P.O 9oi 66 Crystal Bay. Mfi 55323 0066 Mr. Pat Wolfe 2871 Casco Point Road Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 Re; Storage Shed Dear Mr. Wolfe: Pursuant to our discussion of Mav 31.1 understand you will not be providing the City with a revised survey showing your new storage shed as being within your property boundaries. Consequently, your after-the-fact variance application has not been scheduled for the June Planning Commission meeting. You indicate it is now your position that the storage shed is actually an ice tishing house which you intend to move out onto the ice each winter and store temporarily on the shore in the summer. 1 advised you I would review the City codes regarding the status of Tish houses". As a "shed" your building is considered as a permanent structure; as a fish house . it is considered as a temporarv' strucnare. Both permanent and temporary structures are dealt with similarlv in Section 10.55. Subd. 8 and Section 10.22. Subd. 2. Neither tempora .[v_OQr .m.rmrP. ..re nllnwed within 75’ of the lake nor encroaching past the average setback line Neither vou nor anv other resident are allowed to store a tish house in the lakeshore ^d not meeting the setback requirements. A temporary strucmre is considered hardcover, is an encroachment, and is regulated the same as a permanent structure. Your comment that manv propertv owners on Casco Point have fish houses stored ne.xt to the lake has no bearing on vour individual situation. Furthermore, our shoreline inspection tour of the Cas.o Point. West Arm. Forest Lake. Nonh Arm and Carman ’s Bay areas on June -nd found no more than five "fish houses" on appro.ximately 14 miles ot shorelmc. They simply are not being stoied on the shoreline at the vast majority ot lakeshore residences. The Citv’s position on vour building has not changed and will not change no matter what you call it Further the Cin- has no survev that shows this building is located or stored within your propenv boundaries, .-\bsent such a survey, your after-the-fact variance request cannot proceed Telephone (612) 473-7357 • F.W 473-0510 r 5 10.21 Subd. S. Area, Height, Lot WL th and Yard Requirements. A. Height. NO structure or builditg sha^ 1 --tn . in heicht excepw t-''2-1/2 stories or thirty >ee^ ^n . Section 10,75. be observed; B. Lots. The follovitg rtiniDur. requirer.ents shall Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard 10 feet Side Yard Adjacent to Street 15 feet Rear Yard 30 feet 1/2 acre 100 feet 30 feet ___ .. •TH—lA—1*, "LR—IB » SEC. 10.22. Y°f.KESBOR^ DISTRICT. Family Lakeshore Residential Dis-.ic. t..e shall apply: Subd. 1. Laseshcr. Set 3a_c!c Regulations. The set.ack from the shoreline for la.<eshore lots. 1 ' v.« 7«i f&&*- for all structures except hv a ma-ior thorouchfare, a lock box that on iakeshore lots divided inches in height is not in excess of 20 square ^ ^ requires a buixding allowed on the la.keshore portion o. -..e lot permit from the City. B. NO princiral or accessory ^.i,e be located within 75 from^ the^'lhoreline of existing residence /SZ/J^icatio^st escert that this does net Design Standards ® = -“'®b\ection A above.___________________apply to structure allowed .n subsecuro.^------------------------------------^ / u ^ T- tra>'dcov^r and Land Alteration ^“‘’‘^•■-;hin -fs^feet o'/'shoreline there shall be no t^eaulations. within /5 teec ^ cermanent structures excavating, filling, Within 75 e.xcept as permitted f Here shall be no greater than 25i to 250 feet or the 500 ^^et of the shoreline there hardoover. Within 25« llAco---'^V. within 500 feet to 1,000 -J-:?tne^?^i°^a?!^ge no greater than 35, hardoover. -i ORONO CC 283 (4-1-84) s 10.55 **^niriC5 Us6 Districts Subd. 5- rein^in unchanged as designated on t..e Offici ^ - -j-Q^isions of this Section, with the adoption of this Sec.10 . Wetlands Conservation including the designation of Floc^ Plain^a^^^^^ provisions of this Areas, shall be in addiwi setwe^^n other orovisions of thisChapter. Whenever conflicts occur etven - restrictive Chapter and provisions of tnis section, provision shall prevail. ?ubd. 7. an*:Te%‘atIon''n^ aegulatory elevation o£ the regional flood plus inrinfreas°eT i^Ao^d eievatton caused by encroachments on the flood plain. i T^e reaulatorv flood protecticn elevation A. 5®-?^-Aict^icts shall be established by :d^An^^°U0“^Aorto^\re‘^AU lloodjarer^ iisur:nAA“fuly/^*9ulato°y Aood' protection elevations between cross-sections shall oe interpolated. The regulatory flood protection elevation for shall be 932.5 MSia. , - "• p?a!n^DUt-rc*AhaU^r=lrcUrted'ry"l" registered p'Alessional engineer in accordance with procedures se. forth herein. -— ..... q,,HH a Develooment Restricted; Prohibition. Except as Subd. .. permitted, no filling, grading, dredging, hereinafter specifically . t-moorary or oermanent structures, excavation, or other construction shall be obstructions, IT.-n a'rd Wetlands Conservation Area; norallowed within tne ^lood ^ain an- etia Lake Minnetonka I conservation areas in subd. 9. -l°°dway District (FWK Jj^,'/,“.?:,'a""flols! have a low flood aamage iVthin the Floodway District to the These ases shall he " "orohibi**^d by anv other Cityextent that they are not received provision ana pcovia-d ^ * ri^v Code orovisions or regulation of as may be requireu havino jurisdiction, including other "/oca Department of Natural Resources, thelimitation, tne Minnesota E Lake Minnetonka ‘""^^^tlon’A's'-'ioA'^^Ih* addition? no use shall adversely affect Conservation uiSwiicu. i.** ORONO CC 365 (4-1-84) r s 10.55 Subd. 26. Mon-confocniing Uses. A structure or tbe use of a structure or premises which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this Section but which is not in ccnformity with the.. / provisions of this Section may be continued subject to the V following conditions: A. N’o such use shall be expanded, changed, enlarged or altered in a way which increases its non-confcrmitv. » f c- ih' * 3. Mo structural alteration or addition to any non- conformina*^tructure over the life of the structure shall exceed 50 oercent of its va^ue at the time of its becoming a non-conforming use, unless the structure is permanently changed to a conforming use or unless the alteration or addition would substantially reduce potential flood damages for the entire structure. C. Any alteration or addition to any non-conforming use which would result in substantially increasing its flood damage potential shall be protected in accordance with Subdivision 14, Subparagraph E of this Section. D If such use is discontinued for twelve consecutive months, any future use of the building premises shall conform to this Section. The assessor shall notify the -oning Administrator in writing of instances of non-conforming uses whic. have been discontinued for a period of twelve months. E. If any non-conforming use is destroyed means, including floods, to an extent of 50 percent or more by any of its assessed value, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the orovisions of this Section. However, the City may issue a conditional use permit for reconstruction if the use located outside the floodway and, upon the reconstruction, is adequately flood proofed, elevated or otherwise protected in conformity with this Section. ^ Us^s or adjuncts thereof which are or become nuisances shall'not be entitled to continue as non-conforming uses. Q ’^xc “Dt as provided in Subparagraph E above, any use which has been“ peVm i e ted as a conditional use shall not be considered as a non-conforming use. H. Mon-conforming uses located in the Floodway District shall be eliminated or brought into conformity with the sJanda^ds contained in this Section within a reasonable period of time as determined bv the City, after a hearing for each sucn non- cime as -.hoVounril shall make its determination upon the grsl°s'"o?%^e"-no;mal^°us"e£il lif^ any improvement upon the premises In addition, the monetary value of any competitive advantage’ derived bv the operation of such non-conforminq use, by ^easS^of the limitation on establishment of competing businesses OROMO CC 375 (4-1-84) r S 1C.55 as a result of this Section, shall be considered as a reduction of A losses resulting from the requirement of termination of the use I under this Section. . Subd. 27. Amendments. The flood plain designation on the official maps shall not be removed from flood plain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in and that the area is at or above t.he elevation of the regional flocu and is con*-’quous to lands outside the flood plain. Special exceptions to -his rule m.av be permitted by the Commissioner of Natural Resources if he determines that, through other measures, lands are adequately orotected for the intended use. All amendments to this Section includino amendments to the official maps m.ust be submittea to and aporoved by the Commissioner of Natural Resources 1° adoption. Changes in the official maps also require prior app by bh0 F0d0r3l Insur^nc© Adinxnis—on• Subd. 28. Interpretation. In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this Section shall be held ^o minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed rTtv and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other pLers franteS by State Statutes The Flood Plain Districts shall be determined by scaling the official maps. Where interpretation is needed as location of the boundaries of t.he district maps, as for example where there appeairs to be a Enqineer evidence if he so desires. Subd. 29. Abrogation and Greater Restrictio^ns. It is L%Vri^of rin?.%be To-sYon;k^-tlif section doL“^^k^ft;,ir/H"aV’lre\"s^ or land liability flooding or Jny officer or ea^ployee thereof for any llood^^'amlges that result froa, reliance on this Section or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. Source; Ordinance No. 213 Effective Date: 1-11-79 A ORONO CC 376 (4-1-84) TO: FROM: r Planning Commission Members Ron Mixirsc. City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron. iVssi. Planning & 7.oning Administrator DATE: September 15, 1994 SUBJECT: #1948, Frank Kokcsh'Joan Harmon, 4100 Watertown Road • Conditional Use Permit - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Site Plan (Aerial Photo & Letter) B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 8/24/94 C - Memo and Exhibits of 8/11/94 Discussion This item was tabled at your last meeting pending receipt of a comprehensive site plan ot the property indicating the exact areas which Ms. Harmon ^^ould be using under her lease acrcement. Mrs. Kokesh agreed to provide such a plan by identifying the various buildings a areas to be used on the air photo, which Jeanne Mabusth found acceptable. After reviewing the conditional use siiuaiion with Jeanne Mabusth and the City attorney, and afler additional discussions with applicant ‘s attorney. Mr. Ritts, staff has concluded that it wou d be most appropriate to issue the conditional use permit to the Kokeshes as property ^ references acknowledging the lease agreement with Ms. Harmon. A stipulation could be add that the conditional use permit must be reapplied for under any new lessee. Planning Commission questioned whether there are other similar situations '^e <:>t^ w^re the propertv owner is issued a conditional use permit but the use allowed by the Perm« « Gyrated bv' a second partv. Reviewing the list of potential conditional uses m a residential Z(me we are unaware of any other horse boarding or training situation operated thusly in the Citv However, a somewhat parallel situation exists with the day care conditional use permit at the comer of Hichwav 12 and Countv Road 6. in which Onen Brothers own the property but LuAnn Walters operating as Open Arms Day School runs the day care center In that case, the c^nS "rtTrintt Ls is^ed as -running sv.th the property", and both the owner and operator signed the resolution. Please acain review the staff memo of August 1 1th. specincally'^the issues for consideration on page 3 and the options for action on pages 3 and 4. Bnetly. the opt.ons tndude. 1. Dental of conditional use permit, denial of variance to allow a non-owner to Operate a riding academy. r Zoning File #1948 September 15. 1*594 Page 2 2.Approve a new conditional use permit or amend the existing conditional use permit to allow the public stable and riding academy use per Section 10.20. Subd. 3(0) and (P) based on the five findings on page 4 of the 8/11/94 memo; and granting a variance to Section 10.20, Subd. 3(P) (Riding Academy) to allow a non-owner to provide instruction to owners or horses boarded at the site; the above approvals subject to the following coiKlitions: The corslitional use permit for this use shall be granted to the owner of the property specifically for the use as proposed and operated by Joan Harmon and that any new operator will require an amendment to this conditional use pcnnil. Any changes or intensifications in tte uses defined below shall require applicant Joan Harmon to file an amended conditional use permit with the Cirv: The boarding of no more than 10 horses owned by other individuals not residing on the property. (2) Brokerage of horses boarded on propeny only. (3) Riding lessons for clients who bivard horses at facility. 3. Table for further information. 4.Other. ch 50 0 '■ S'- -'>r'''‘'^^''-‘> I •sv,';.s ..-^ .v.i^ ;•■■ I'J I ■ -'"-■- ■* ■• ■ ^'■i».,;-l .'Ja^ 'tm fe ■"'v. • ' ■ v-v ^11 ['4'''’"’'‘v-^j| ■ ‘*->5':l^ ft#-’ '-i1 ^r>xr: i: ■« .;>-vf^ 41 C ? Wale ^iC .Vn Rc id f.* ’pIl f-'a n. f/M 55353 (612)47GC457 noptumL'or 14. 1904 'V. To- Q.oro C;!>* ‘-i;i:i Ru; i.ar'U Uoo Ptirni.t PU.ar=c f.r.d cnc:oi.rfd p:ctu-e of cur prcp'jrly located at tt»e adtlrecs nbovo. I have rrarked th=e arcaf wh;ch wui be ;j:.rjda“ocled under the diGcussod leaGO PloaGo coil nc -.f Iho^o are ary further qucGl^cns Thank you. S-ue Kokt '1 C V ’A■'■■• -.f. ><--' . jl. \ crrv OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Cnstal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONLNG FILE #1948 NOTICE OF PL.\NNING C03LMTSSI0N ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 8/24/94 TO:Frank Kokcsh 4100 Watertown Road Maple Plain. MN 55359 COPIES TO:Joan M. Harmon c/o Chris Ritts, Any. Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap Ltd 2450 Park Avenue Mpls.. MN 55404 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance/Condiiional Use Permit DATE OF MEETLNG: 8/15/94 VOTE: — FOR AGALNST • Applicants indicated they would withdraw the application and resubmit with Frank Kokesh as applicant. • Applicant ’s attorney indicated he would research the legal issues sunounding issuance of a CUP to a non-owner and/or the ability of an owner to transfer CUP rights/obligations to a non-owner. • Planning Commission requested that staff ask City Attorney to also review this, and for staff to review any similar situations currently existing in the City. • Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth has concluded that the current application signed by Ms. Harmon as applicant and by Mr. Kokesh as owner need not be formally withdrawn nor re-submitted, but that additional inlormation from the applicants is required: 1. Applicant to provide a to-scale plan using the 1988 survey to detine areas to be used in her horse boarding/riding academy operation. Application cannot be scheduled for funher Plamiing Commission review until a to-scale site plan is submitted for staffs review. 2. Staff is advised that the property is tor sale. Given this intormation, do applicants wish to proceed with this request? If a buyer for the propeny is found, will the horse operation continue? Applicant ’s ne.xt scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the September 19th meeting is September 9th. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are avaUable from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ch r TO; FROM: DATE: / ^ Plaruung Commission Members Ron Mooisc. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building Sc Zoning Administrator Aucust 11, 1994 SUBJECT: #1948 Joan Harmon. 4100 Watertown Road - Conditional Use Pemiit/Variance Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.27, Subd. 3 (refer to Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (0) Sc (P)J - Conditional use permit required for maintenance of stables/barns for the bi'iarding of horses owned by nonowners of property. (O) The structure used for the boarding or training of the horses shall be located 150’ from the nearest lot line. All strucmres used tor housing of horses are w'fll beyond the 150’ setback. (P) Riding academy - Any such stfuemre- maintained as an accessory use and conducted by the owner must meet the requirements of Sections M, N and O of this subdivision. No such instruction shall occur less than 100’ from an adjacent residence or less than 75’ from the nearest lot line. Refer to E.xhibits E, F and G Section 1 J.20. Subd 3 (M) - Area requirements for the keeping of animals. Section 10.03, Subd. 18 • Maintenance of animals on a property that housed animals as of January 1975 are subject to this section of the code. In 1975 applicant maintained tweiay horses. Current proposal involves the boarding of ten. A conditional use permit would not be required under this .section. Based on Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (M). the area requirements for animals at the property would allow boarding of thirty-three horses. o Section 10.27. Subd. 3 (Refer to Section 10.20, Subd. 3 0^ Riding Academy) - CurrenI! applicant seeks a variance to the requirement that all training be conducted by owner or residciii. of property. Ms. Harmon is a resident of White Bear. She notes that two pan time employees live within ten minutes of the property. The owner’s son will occupy. List of Exhibits A - Application Bl-3 - Applicant’s Addendum Information C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Survey F - Sketch of Operation Submitted by Dan Kokesh r Zoninii File #1948 August 11, 1994 Page 2 G - Aerial Photo of Entire Horse Operation H - Resolution #1894 I - Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/85 J - Council Minutes 12/9/85 K - Oberhauser Letter 12/30/85 Histoo' of Operation The Kokesh horse operation has been in existence prior to 1975. The owner noted in an earlier 1985 review that in 1975 he maintained twenty horses. Since 1975 the use expanded to boarding and raisin? of horses owned by not only applicant but for public. Smd serv ices were prov i e , brokerage of horses for owner and others, riding lessons, approximately two major horse shows a year and a tack caulogue sales operauon. In 1985 the only sections of the code that provided controls on an operation such as the Kokesh farm were sections dealing with area «9U‘remenu for the maintenance of animals. Section 10.03. Subd. 18. dealing with stiKk larms and a home cKcupation licensing section. In response to persistent neighbors ’ complaints concerning an increase in commercial activity and commercial use of the Kokesh property, the applicant tiled an appals to determine if a land use application was necessary . In the tall of 1985 J ^ ^ Commission determined .hat there was need to tile a land use application and , a conditional use permit for his horse boarding and training operation. Review Exhibits 11 1. J and K a conditional use permit was to be reviewed each year on the anniversary date o the original approval. Since that 1985 review when the neighbors were all allowed to vent their concerns with the operation, the City never received another complaint nor have we ^er required Mr. Kokesh to file a second conditional use permit. In fact the operation has been trimmed back considerably in the last live years. It is staffs understanding that the Kokeshes have purchased propirty in Florida of the vear in the south and spend little lime at the property on Watertown Road. The curren horse o^ration is very minimal. Mr. Kokesh ’s son resides at the residence tull time and assumes all responsibility for the facility year around. Review of Current AppHc3tion Mr Kok-sh asks the Citv now to consider allowing a non-resident to operate a limited horse oDeration*ai his property ' Review Exhibits B (1-3). Joan Harmon proposes a limited operation cListing of the bcfardL of ten horses owned by five individuals and will services L noted in her addendum information. Brokerage service will involve only her live clients Riding lessons will onlv be provided for the five clients. No other services or ac“v«»es w X’ provided The property will no longer deal with racing horses. Riding lessons will be Umitt^ to the persona who board horses. No longer will the farm provide horse shows and there w ill be no tack sales from catalogues. Zoning File #1948 Augu't 11, 1994 Page 3 Since the 1985 review, the code was amended in July of 1986 providing for a conditional use for stables and bams, private or public, and for a riding academy use as noted aNne. Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (P) - riding academy use states that only the owner shall conduct the training activities associated with the riding academy. The applicant is not an owner and a variance is required to one of the performance standards of the conditional use permit. During the 1985 review all training and other activities were either conducted by the owners or their daughter. Issues for Consideration 1.Does the fact that a non-resident'owner of the property shall operate the riding academy raise any concerns.* What was the intent of that specific standard of the ordinance? Does the hobby farm use change because the operation is no longer conducted by the owner (more commercial) -- or was the intensification in use and add ons of uses under the Kokesh years of operation already at a far more intense commercial use than a true hobby farm use? This issue is key for this review and members should be prepared to respond. Ms. Hannon has provided a schedule that records v arious levels of activity during the day and the months of operation noting when deliveries and certain sized vehicles will be entering the property. These activities will be greatly reduced from the former operation that was at a maximum of twenty-five horses in addition to all the other traffic and delivenes associated with the other add on uses. Is there a phase of Ms. Harmon ’s operation that raises any concerns? 3 Staff can confirm that the riding stable and the horse bam are located 150' from the lot line but staff cannot confirm that training areas are 75 ’ from all lot lines. It is not clear from the infomiation received as to where these training areas will be located. There are no setbacks for horses that are placed out in their pastures (turn our) but the training area is another matter. It appears that steeplechase activities are conducted close to the Watenown Road area at the southeast comer, refer to your aerial photo. It will be necessary to have Ms. Harmon provide more detailed site plan locating areas of her operation, .specifically, the training areas defined on the site plan. 4. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Options of Action ©\) Denial finding proposed use to be in complete conflict with the intent of the code that encouraged hobby fami use exclusively tot the owners ot the property; or J Zoning f ile #l94ii Aucust 11. 1994 Paee 4 To approve or amend the coisiitional use permit to allow a public stable ai^ riding academy use finding the proposed level of use to be far less commercial in use than the previous opcraiion and to grant a variaiKC that would allow a nonowner to i^peraie a riding stable at the property located at 4040 Watertown Road based on the following unique findings and hardships: 1.Proposed level of use w ill be a far less intense commercial use of the property than the previous horse operation. The proposed use of the property will allow the owner to maintain the facility rather than offering the property for residential subdivision. 3.A riding academy/horsc boarding operation has existed on this property for o\^r twenty-five years. 4.The proposed use will be consistent with the other hobby farm uses along Watertown Road. 5. There is adequate area to meet area requirements for the maintenance of ten horses (total acreage 35 acres). The approval of this conditional use permit and variance is subject to the following conditions: 1. Any changes or intensifications in the uses defined below shall require applicant, Joan Harmon, to file an amended conditional use permit with the City. The boarding of ten horses owned by other individuals not residing on property. b. Brokerage of horses boarded on property only. c.Ridinc lessons for clients who board horses at facility. Approval and granting a variance to Section 10.27, Subd. 3 [Section 10.20, Subd. 3 tP) Riding Academyl that would'allow a nonowner to provide training of horses boarded at site based on those findings that I listed before. Approval is subject to the tollowing condition. 1.Applicant to provide a to-scalc site plan using the 1988 survey to define areas to be used in her horse boarding/riding academy operation. Application cannot be scheduled before the Council until a to-scale site plan is submitted for staffs review. '^^or to table application. r Zoning File #1948 August 11, 1994 Page 5 Planning Commission Members may wish to table the application until the to-scale site plan is submitt^ for the review of the Commission. r '1'f vc CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND LSE A PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address _______ #4 948 Y/oo Type of Application to be Filed /Zgj/y^ PropcTT}’ Identification Number (P.I.D.) 3/-//?*-4!- ' ^ CC'-^ APPLICANT Name___ Address__City Phixic (borne) PheoK (u'ork) OWNER (if ditt^em z.tp___________ ^^oY y£4/ ' different than anplicaiR) Phone (borne) , ______ Phone (work) C/i>. Date Property Acquired ^_____________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land ~r4 3^ _ (month'year) FEES - COiVDITIONAL USE PERMITS - \/, % 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use $2(X) 00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $175 00 Guest Housc/Gucst Apanments 5150.00 Duple.x Credit/Bldg 5250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use 5200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling • designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ’ of lakeshore cirr CF • * 'r *A- f t ’l! •r'lrN . ^Vi^V'VV V V ■ I • ‘ J \'A CW- «’*C “ wr » Awc •V ) k. EIFf' ■ i 7 r A * ^ • 175. YOl it.VvCwA^V WvC'A liOl /a ti? /' S' » / A PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule 51(X).00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS ______ 5200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) 5250.00 Vacation ______ 5175.00 Easement Vacation 5 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______ 5300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ______$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District__ Present Use of Property l/RiResidential Other (specify) ^ reqitreo submittals 1. 4m*» 3. Completed Application Form Desenbe request in deuil ~7P^ Certified Propcitv Ouners List of owiiers within 350* L'ou can obtain this list^from Hennepin Count>’ Department of Finance, A-603. Govemme ' Center. 348-3271). (X Plat Map. Certificate of Sur\cy (signed by a liceru.ed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic sur\ey (e.xisting and proposed contoun) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital sams) of all persons with an interest m the property This would include namets) of applicant(s) if not current owncr(s). Construction plan, if applicable (sec staff for requirements). ------ As an addendum to this application, please anach a separate list of any other persons YOU W ish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF FOR REPRODUCTIO.N (11” X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENT SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Propeny Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Cenification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Imtials of Clerical Staff________________________ Date.------------------------------------- 5. 6 7. 8. 9. 10. The applicant hereby aerees to provide all information required or requested by the Zonmg \dminiLator acrees to pav additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual e.xpenses incurred in reviewr of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her know ledge. .Applicant’s signamreV^Date "T [ tq [^4-. members for purposes ojnnvistn^ipn>at5j;^ of this request. DateOwner’s signamre Appuc^m. muM have all sahS^s m.o U.e On- office, 25 <U>, before Ore Comm.,,101. Meeimg, ere held Oh die third ,p anehd a scheduled meermg. of this change prior to the meeting. r prbsbit use of property Present Zoning District ^ Present Use of Property C RR-1 #■’ m «X ercial Stable and 48®' Stock Fana Other (specify) DBSOUPTIOII OP REQUEST Describe reguest in details See attached The activities that the applicant desires to carry on on his property are followsi (1) Ksardlng and raising hersee wnad by the occupants > C2) Boarding and leielng-hersea owned by othertr either individually or in syndicationi (3)«- BtDd :t C4) (5) («. Brokerage of horses> Riding lessons} —• q and oonaue»*»»g horse shove not to exceed two shove per yeen Tt) nr prri^nffte es a stock or inventory. net It is proposed that these ectivities be conducted on Parcel 11-0007, Parcel 14-0005, and Parcel 14-0004, ^ich cospriae a parcel of land of approximately 25.47 acres, plus or ninus, and Parcel 14-0006 coapriiing of approxiaately ten acres. lb /O /i/t3 ^ S /J/VS OMMERS SIGNATURE NCJearX-O r t Z-1 y u 1 / / The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and furthei authorizes reasonable entry oiito-^iie property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission membei^s, arid C^fu'.cil members for purposes of investigatior and verif icationu-of-tb^s:j:egbo^v^ / / Owner's sig:Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. CITY or ORORO GENERAL LAUD OSE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 4100 Vatertovn Road Property Identification Number (P.Z.D.) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrent? (for Conditional Dse Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included required survey. APPLICANT Name FRANK KOKESH bv Attorney Louis B OberhauserPhone 473-2521 Mailing Address 1421 East Wayzata Boulevard, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 OWNER N^une FRANK KOKESH Phone (R)473-1489 (W)935-6955 Mailing Address 4100 Watertown Road, Orono, Minnesota Date Property Acquired Approximately 1970 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ^BS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS XX $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use % $150.00 b) Institutional (church# school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration (grading, filling) PRD/PID - see fee schedule Other Applications $250.00 Vacation $250.00 Rezoning $100.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule ' • # r % - . .-a P-' Hy name is Joan M. Harmon. I am 33 years old. I am a mother of a 4 year old daughter. I have been teaching and training horses for the past nine years. I graduated from White Bear Lk. high school in 1978. I then attended, and graduated from Gustavus Adolphus College in 1982, where I majored in Sociology and Anthropology. Upon completion of college, I was a New Market coordinator ^or an insurance agency for 2 years. During this tine I also 9-lOth grade girls soccer at White Bear High School, until 1986. I decided in 1985 to go into training horses and instruct ing riding full-time. Along with having my own program 1 have done some classes for Edina and St. Louis Park Community Education programs, for grades 1-6. My tiding has been apart of my growing up. I compete as a young girl and became acquianted with Renee Kokesh. Wo have been friends throughout our professional career. So too, I have known the Frank Kokesh family with their involvement in horses. I' A ,c, I i ♦ r Jl 'N <v,.e- The times the stable will be open to those riding there, \ith horses boarded, shall be Tuesdays - Sunday, 9:00 am - 8:00 pm. I will break that down into days and hours, below. There will be 2-3 employees, 1 full-time, and 1-2 part-time, that will be responsible for the care, turn-out, and managing everyday of the week 8:00am - 4:30 pm. The barn will be closed to boarders and for any lessons on Mondays. There will be several deliveries each month that will be made up of grain, shavings, and hay delivery. Each of these will arriving once a month to six weeks. The hay deliveries will consist mainly in the summer to autumn months. The other vehicle that will come to the barn sev'eral times a month will be the farrier to care for the horses feet. There will be 10 horses, with 5 owners. These horses will be ridden by their owners and their children to have lessons each week. As these riders progress, their horses may be sold, and replaced with a more advanced mount. The horses we have are show horses, thus in the spring until fall (April - October) we will be traveling to shows. At this time, we do not own our own horse van,.so we will be relying on a commercial van to ship us a couple weeks out of these months stated above. There will be a member of the family living at the farm, and 2 of the employees live within 10 minutes drive of the stable in case of need beyond the hours that the barn is open. Theirs and my phone numbers will be accesible at the barn. Hours and traffic load: Summer (June 9 - Labor day): Monday - barn closed Only employees there to care for the horses • 3am-4pm. Tuesday - 9am -12pm •• •'2-3 cars 12pm - 3pm •• •1-2 cars 3pm -6 pm •• •3-4 cars 6 pm -8 pm •• •1-2 cars Weds. -9am -12pm •• •2-3 cars 12pm -3 pm • • •1-2 cars 3pm •6 pm • • •3-4 cers 6 pm —8 pm •• •1-2 cars Thurs. -9ara -12pm •• •1-2 cars 12pm -3 pm •• •1-2 cars 3pm -6 pm •• •1-2 cars 6pm —8 pm •• •1-2 cars Friday -9am -12pm •• •1-2 cars 12pm -3 pm •• •1-2 cars 3pm -6 pm •• •1-2 cars 6 pm -8 pm •• •1-2 cars / (JEta Hours and traffic load cont'd: *) IT Sat. Sun. - 9 am 12pm 3 pm 6 pm 9 am 12pm 3pm 6 pm - 12pm . - 3 pm . - 6 pm . - 8 pm . - 12pm . - 3 pm . - 6, pm . - 8 pm . * i 3*“4 cars 2- 3 cars 1-2 cars 0- 1 cars 1- 2 cars 3- 4 cars 1-2 cars 0-1 cars r ^ - School days (Labor day - June) Monday - barn closed - only employees horses 8ara - 4pm Tuesday - 8am - 11am .. 11am - 3 pm . 3pm - 6 pm 6pn - 8 pm Weds. - 8am - 11am 11am - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm Thurs. - 8am - 11am 11am - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm Friday — Bam - 11am 11am - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm Sat. - 9am - 12pm 12pm - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm Sunday - 9am - 12pm 12pm - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • there to care for the 1-2 cars (workers) 1-2 cars 3-4 cars 1-2 cars 1-2 cars ( " ) 1-2 cars 3-4 cars 1-2 cars 1-2 cars ( ” ) 1-2 cars 1-2 cars 0- 1 cars 1- 2 cars ( '* ) 1-2 cars 1- 2 cars 0- 1 cars 3-4 cars 2- 3 cars 1- 2 cars 0- 1 cars 1- 2 cars 2- 3 cars 1-2 cars 0-1 cars V^VVNS"! ' MJN MTE 97/9i/m• «• ‘ •' iATCfi MSr raV MOfI * 'MCK MAMI TAXFAYfll NAHi/AM«•V'5 >t.V"* ♦r ^IMCt NttC TAMPm* NIIC/AOm.V^,'i'm» totmfrrttVAYElil^VNMC/AO f4>; . M * rr ^ * >' ik raop ABM OMCR HANi bJl^TAMBAVCR ^ li NMC/AOOR t' ■'T * MM MM QMNCR NAMK TAXPArCt rMAHi/AOm I V'-* ^ MOP AOM OMNn NAHi ^4^: TAXPAYfR • -NAME/AOM•^U' I ■’.V HEFtCPIN COUNTY MO««TY INTOIWATIOM STSTTH MOBCRTY OM«tS ItSTSB Sl-llB-» 11 BOOS M7AS OKMAM PAW M)L A ANDfRSON I S N VOKL L A ANDCRSOM ASM VOCCL 7A5 OBCMARO PAW »LONB lAM m SSSMSB Sl-llB-tS 11 BOM eOAlS OBCNABO PAW M K a A LANS KtVIN N LAN6 AIS ORCNAIW PAim RD LONB LAAt M4 SSSSASB si«iiA-zs 11 edisOAtSS SIXTM AVI N M IMP S NTATT mUIAM B NTATT AISB N AT« AVf IT e LAU m S535A SB Sl-ns-XS lA 0001 poses oBCNAm paw m BAH TNOHAS BQM«LL B A NBNRICTA TNOHAS BBS ORCNARO PAW 10 LONB LWt Ml 5SSSA SB Sl-llB-lS lA 0007 OAieO NATCRTOMI RB FRAW KOKESN CT AL PRAW KOKESN AlOB MATtRTOMI RO NAPLfe PLAIN Ml SSSSf SB Sl>tlB-lS A1 OOOA OA105 MATERTOMI RO 0 eXOUERE A A BIOUERE PAMIALEE HARIE SANCNUK AlOS NATERTOMI RO HAPLE PUIN Ml 55359 p : •V ’•* » Vi'W'r ♦ * *• - .............................. *- 58 S1-118-Z5 IIMIU SIXTH AVf Hmim i CHOIS MIAN L CHUIS Alts ATH AVf N LONG lAtf HN SS5S458 51-118-25 12M285 SIXTH AVf N CMAHlfS t tAHSQN C8A8US E LAHSON A28S ATH AVf NO LONG LAKE m S55SA58 51-118-n 12 OOlS 04220 SIXTH AVf N 8 A J HAItaNQ JH 8C8E8T C A JULIE HANNINC 4220 CTY 80 NO A LONG LAKE m SS5S4 58 51-118-25 14 0002 MS2S 0HCHA80 8A88 80 8 J NEEST8AN0 ET At 8ANDAU J MEEST8AN0 S2S 08CHA8D 8A88 80 tONC LA8I 104 SS5S4 58 51-118-25 41 0001 04040 NATEHTOtl 80 SUSAN 80KESH SUSAN KQ8ESH 4040 NATE8T0MN 80 HAPIE PLAIN m 55559 58 51-118-25 41 0005 0408S NATE8T0HN 80 C F DALE ACL PAU.SCM CHHISTOPHfH r dale GE81 L PAUL30N 4085 NATE8T0HN 80 HAPLE PLAIN HN S5359 PfPOHT NO. P1455401 PMSl 458 51-118-25 1100445 08CHAH0 PAH8 89 JAN PIOCfONJOHN G A HAMALEN H PIDtXON 10412 GUN NILOINQ LA tLOCMNGTQN m 5545158 51-118-25 12 001204225 SIXTH AVf N N A HL1LLE8 A P O HIXIIE8 NILLIAH a I PfGGT A HUELLE8 80X 5LONG LAKE m 5535458 51-118-25 15 001504500 NATEHTONN 80 JANES JAY JOHNSON A Ntfi JANES JAY JOHNSON 45M NATE8T0MN 80 HIPIE PLAIN Ml SS3Sf 38 31-11B>E3 IP 0003 00505 ORCNARO PARR Ml 0 r KOKESN I P J BENSON 0 F KOKESN A P J BENSON 505 ORCNARO PAW RO LONB LAKE Ml S535A 3i 31-ilS-ES n 0003 040PS NATERTOMI RO EARL N CORN ETAL EARL N DORN POPS NATERTdMl RO HAPLE PUIN Ml 5S3S9 30 31-118-2S 41 OOOS 0^145 MATERTOMI RO H R A M E PLANK SALLY PLAW 327 NORTH CARRIN6T0N BUFFALO NY B2B34 F . t * V % * ; • J •. I . Vr «' . %.t:r ‘!(•4 \ It * *K » >*^080^v:• P %■• ^CD \« %Jt ‘%r r •. ■ .k • Ik • N*^ »■( r. f i» S« r *•* i. • \ * /•^ t 4 k.. A ^ b- . r- 4-'Vs \‘ k'r'* i M\4 "I Y W3l, .* p • p.%: ... ^ • •] ^ »•! • i in ^ : * mm UTf' MTOi MS HDtCFIH couHTT wmmwir tmomvkrtm systchPHOPfUTY CMCtS LIST KIPOtT HD. PAM PI^SS^l5 A-1’PM0P AMP omrt MAW TA' 'fP mat./AMP'i Si ii-iiB-zs ii Mil Mils NATCPTOW PP mCPACt P i HAPt E PtAW HXCMAit PUW SET NOPTP CAMXMCrrm PUrPAtO Mr 8ESS4 Si Sl-llP-ES A1 0012 0A02S MATfPTOMN PO J S I P D PICE JfPOME STAMLEV PICE 40ES MATtPTCMi U HAPU PtAIM •Pi SSISP S2-1I8-2S n OOOSOPCPAPP PAPA PO r F AOMS t J I MEAVfl TMQNAS F ADAMS SOP OPCMAPO PAPA PO LQMB LAAE m S5SS4 .0.I ■OWEP MAW TA)9AY1P> mm/mm S2-iiP-» u poorOPCNAPO PAPA n ALDEPT T i SANDPA A fSCO SAMOY ESCO SI PPMfT PAMUTON CLAYTON CA MSI7 SD S2-11P-2S 2S OOAAO OPCMAPO PAW PO POOEPT J A LOPPAIME E PODCN PODEPT J A LOPPAINE E PODEN AAO OPCMAPO PAPA PO LQNO LAAE m 5SS54 Si S2-lli-rS SE OPPE OSSiO HATfPTtPii PO OPCMAPO PAPA FAPH INC OICMAPO PAPA FAPM INC SMO NATEPTOMN PO MAPLE PLAIN ff< 55S5S ;..v-'.■•.*5;vt • ^V •CL «i’..*4 ^4k ,^mm mmyy.yrtai9»nn‘it* ‘h?;TOTAL MTCHI OOS 00024W- k "'aii'VL' % • ‘M sit T?' < •'* ‘ ‘ 4 .SISIA .. . t -D»i# • '<rV ■■'t:" >•. f %M.'r«*■»■ I* r •;■- V(I/• .1. :^•* i ■ ■ f ' •. ' • ^ S . JTC^ •• • .£ . ■', ■• • .i «i *i V>:'A V /■'.' I •'■■ / *•?' ■•• 1 V I. yt .. ■>.■. •*» 4#0?»» . — X CEPTIFY TMAT THE FACTS PfPPESENTED APE AH ACt**PAn AND TPUl PEPPESENTATION OF INFOPMATION AS IT APPEAPS THIS OATi ON TUI ilCOPDS OF THE MENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATIQNo TO THE OEST OF HV ANQNLEOGE AND OELIEF DATE ■ -i • ' -r: .•>•■'. * «^ « V- -:im ■•■ - li''AvV' '. iV- t tt ‘ > "I !• ’. U V y V- * ’ ■ y'-V'y''' *,r K If• • .1 *•••. ' V* • ' ' #*r ci • h IV5 ■vv* • . : •. »r. -.• , . *^. •GAL* DESCR IPTfON OF RE CO f^D : " * • menu 1: ' e South 7.S0 acres of the East l/^ of the Northeast 1/4 of ction 31, loiNnship 118 North, Range 23, West of the 2th incipal Meridian, and that part of the East 1/2 of the South .50 acres of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the ^4ortheast 4 lying North of the Watertown Road described as: Beginning the Northwest corner of the South 7.50 acres of the East 1/4 the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 31? thence North along e East line of said East 1/2 of the South 27.5 acres of th® st 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 4.0 feet? thence West parallel with the North line of the uth 7.50 acres of the East 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a stance of 1E5.O0 feet? thence South parallel with the orementioned East line to the centerline of the Watertown ad? thence Southeasterly along said centerline to its tersection with the West line of the South 7.50 acres of the 3t 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4? thence North along said line to 3 point of beginning, according to the United States vernment Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, nnesota. RCEL 2: The West 1/4 of the South 3/8 of the Northeast 1/4 the Northeast 1/4, and that part of the West 1/4 of the itheast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 lying North of the center ne of the Minneapolis and Watertown Hoad, in Section 3l, jwnship IIB, Range 23, XEPT, That part of the West One-fourty of the Southeast larter of the Northeast Quarter, Sectidh 31, Township 118, inge 23 described as commencing at the intersection of the •nter lino,of the Watertown Road with a line 35 feet West of, *asured at right angles, to and parallel with the East line of lid West One-fourth of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast larter? thence North, parallel with said East line, a istance'of 135 feet? thence East, at right angles, a distance r 35 feet to the point of beginning? thence West,, at right igles to said East line, a cistance of 70 feet? thence South, irallel with said East line, to the center line of said road? lence. Southeasterly, along said center line, to said East ine? >thence North,- along said East line to the point of according to the United States Government Survey \eriaof;iand sittiafe ln'Hennep|n County, ninnepota. ? - . ARceil ‘ ‘ ' ■' . S denotes iron monume O denotes iron monumei marked R.LS 14343 ». ;• ’ V- * ‘ \ ‘ • « **.«' • *• ; ! • . ^ # ‘ • V » . %. • / Jr• *> .v> I -• ** hat part of the East i/2 of the South 27.50 acres of the West /2 of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 lying North of the inneapolls and. Watertown.Road described as beginning at the mthwest corner of the South 7.50 acres of the East 1/4 o hc,Northeast 1/4*of Section 31, T. 118, R« 23? thence North long the East,line of‘-said East 1/2 of the South 27.50 acres f the West 1/2; of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 a iptance of 264l00 feet'to the actual point of beginning of and to be described? thence continuing North along the East ine of said East'1/2 of the South 27.50 acres of the West 1/2 f the East 1/2 of the. Northeast 1/4 to the Northeast corner hereof? thence West along.the North line of the South 27.50 cres.;to the West line of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4? hence.Southerly on the West'lire of the East 1/2 of the ortheast 1/4-to the center line of the Minneapolis and atertown Road?, thence Southeasterly along said center line to ts Intersection with a line drawn 165.00 feet West of the . est line of. the South 7.50 acres of the East 1/4 of the orthirfast 1/4? thence North parallel with jrd 165.00 feet West f \hB Uest line of said South 7.50 acres 616.98 feet to a oint 165.00 feet West of the actual point of beginning? ^East 165.00'feet to the actual point of beginning, iccord^ng to the United States Govern.mont Survey thereof and ituate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. ’PRCEL 4: That part of the West one-fourth of the Southeast iuarter of the Northeast Quarter, Secti^on 31, township 110, ?ange 23 described as commencing at th®* interscct ion of the renter ‘lino of the Watertown Road with a line 35 feet West of, teasured at right angles to and parallel with the East line of laid West One-fourth of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter? thence North, parallel with said East line, a distance of 135 feet? thence East, at right angles, a distance of 25 feet to the point of beginning? thence West, at right angles to said East line, a distance of 70 feet? thence South, parallel with said East line, to the center lino of said road? thence Boutheamterly, along said center line, to said East line? thence North, along said East line, to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate, in Hennepin County, Minnesota. . •-» . * , ’S a w I f. f . • . .. V -4. , [. ' -5 • • ? . 'Ji-' . • • .1 , • CITY OF OR 6' LTUIL^!^13_P,HR^1IT f>LAN . RC' V)Air:OzMZH PEHMIT NO. . Al'i’fiuvrijsuDMiriL'o .. . 1 APPMOvro \,'iTH coRni crioNs as noi 11 NOI Al'PRUVCD — CORKffil & RESUO: c.*rnri;irl'i .»(«• fof yo.tr liiloiirifition. All work ?!•.» •f' Iti i 3IH *ith .til huilihnn & 2onlnf» i; ‘ iii.Mil.; itciru not ill/ MO'ClJ il) li» hfu* 4HIS Fi/,r4 ;if.r UN SlU Al AIL Th ft§qu§9l9d by FRANK kOKESH ’ i ,« *; * . I hweby certify that fhJt tjrv$y,pk/n,or . reperf prepored by me or under my direct eupervision ond that t am a duty Reolstered Land Surveyor under V ■ » ' * 9 W Division SSOCIATES^ . V • Land Surveyors 1-800-362-36' Buffalo, Minnesota 633t3 ^ 682-;>47' Survey part of the' E.t/2 of the N.E.I/4^ ^ m - » I ( ( , ',f r' I t V' (V'l p'7v '. ' i'c.--.- • • ■■■ wk..; - v-V : V<< “ ^ * . • 't . V w . HilM m m m m lf#3 wsm • <v '^'• IM eirl - vv,' *' ' ' . 4 I i»iil 1^ m mmm>M Wm PMI r.f'J aWBBm '?^:;£?S>ii^i ■ ....rr;SVv i wm J ftv ^; m i.~. I- ’•r-'il m ifK -4 !•*. ^ •J »• ,■ ^ -ivyai ’ ' i- '/ v>,r,- ♦^"• • i r J*«’ • • CITY OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^694 A RESOLOTION GRANTIIK: A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.27* SUBDIVISION 4 (A) and a conditional use permit per MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20* ^CaniXISION 3 (P) FILE IJ 9^4^ BBERBAS, Frank Kokesh (hereinafter -the applicant ’) is the nf the orooerty located at 4100 Watertown Road within the City lToro°o ('i,.re^inaTt.r ’'’City") and legally described as follows: s: -sv;..”?;".''.*.;.".'M 1/4 of Section 31# Township 118# Range 23 lying North (of the center line) of the Minneapolis and Watertown Roa * (hereinafter -property*); and MHBREAS. the applicant has made application for a variance to rond!=risr;s'’t rorstV^renraYtThtrse's ot horses per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20* Subdivision 3 (F). Minnesota : NOW* THEREFORE* BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono* FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #994. 2. The property is located in the RR-IA Rural Residential Zoning District. The property contains approximately 35 acres in area 4. The Orono Planning of P^h^'p^o^pose^ November 18, 1985, and anlmLs for commercial variance to allow the Iceeping o subdivision 4 (A)* and purposes per continued use of applicant's property for public no g use based on the following findings: A) Applicant's principal residence is located on a 35 acre site. B, NO other variances are d"o-^^ section 10.27* Subdivision 4 (A) keeping animals. __ _ __ _ 1 r CITY OF ORONO City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. C) The proposed level of use is compatible with surrounding 5 acre "hobby farm" neighborhood. D) The property has been used as proposed in this review for over 15 years and has not resulted in any harm to the publics’ safety or welfare. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the ^ cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a public riding stable will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not ad versely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of ° a property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Cod6 and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONSr ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings^ the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision <1 (A) to allow the keeping of domestic animals for commercial purposes and per Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (F) gran s a conditional use permit to permit the continued use cf ® property for public riding stable use subject t ? folio ing condition^^.^ total number of full and part time employees hired by the applicants to assist in the commercial horse operation shall not exceed the level of 5 employees except for which large assembly permitting process shall establish level o temporary employees. 2. Riding lessons are to be provided by members of applicant's family. 3. Horses maintained on property shall not exceed the number allowed per Section 10.27 Subdivision 4 (A). 4. Applicant shall renew conditional use permit annually until Council specifies otherwise. CITY OF ORONOy City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 189 4 5. Authorities granted by the conditional use permit run with the property not with the o%mer and are permissive only. 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the 2oning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 4 CITY OF ORONO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1894__________ IKESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC • • * MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 4^On this ! L-' —j ^ . ,a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I£A^-1>»57 r Cm ^ m r ^ T^lpers’onTs) 'described in and whb executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as hxs (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC -"H p. ^ ^ f ‘ A /fS'y my COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 a#MtiKa MINUTES OF TUB PrJ\WnNG COMMISSION HEirTIKG HELD NOVEMBER 18, 1985. PAGE 8 1993 TONKA TRANSMISSION continued Dan Crear stated that approval of the request would create a visible change of use because the clientele from a t-ansmission shop differs from a gas station. He noted that he would like the property cleaned up. There were no other persons present regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Callahan, to recommend denial of request #993 Tonka Transmission to amend the permit dated May 9, 1983, maintaining only 10 parking stalls, and in addition requiring the removal of gas tanks not in use. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. McDonald voted nay stating that the city should review alternatives to removing the gas tanks. §994 PRANK KOKESH 4100 WATERTOWN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 11:07 - 11:40 Chairman Callahan explained the request for a conditional use permit to aermit the continued use of applicants' 35 acre site for the boarding of horses, rental of horses and instruction i horse back riding; and a variance to permit applicants' t-. continue with the keeping of domestic animals for commercia purposes. Attorney Lou Dberhauser was present for this matter, representing t^e apolicants. Mr. & Mrs. Earl Dorn, 4045 Watertown Road, were present for this matter. Mr. Dorn voiced his irritation at the applicants' rel jsal to appear at these meetings. He stated that the applic^-nts' have committed a misdemeanor offense. He noted that hi 5 main purpose of attending was that he wanted the city to app .y their ordinances fairly. He also advised the Commission -hat he has requested a copy of Scott County's public stable ordinance. Ms. Plank, 4145 Watertown Road, was present and stated she was concerned about applicants' plans for the additional property recently acquired by applicant, and what the conditional use permit included. Mr. Oberhauser stated that the applicants have no plans to expand the operation and that their request for a conditional permit is to permit the existing level of use. Mr. Dorn stated that applicants' commercial operation has created 100% more traffic. Kelley felt that riding lessons should be limited to family members only. MINUTKS OP TUF. PIJVNNINo COMMISSION MKirTlNO HELD NOVEMREE 18, PACK 9 1994 PRANK KOKESH continued Oborhauser stated that applicants* would need some en.ployoo to train and work, the horses in addition to stable persons although the actual number of employees needed was unknown ti hin. Planning Coimission felt that the number of omplcyees shoul be limited to a maximum of ten people. There were no more comments from the public and the publi* hearing was closed. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by McDonald, to recommem approval of the conditional use permit subject to staff'; recommendations and conditions, amending the followin' conditions: 1. Applicant to apply for a Home Occupation License to tack sales. 2. Any changes or additions in use or intensification o. approved uses should be reviewed with the City so that staff can determine if a new permit is required Conditional Use Permit to be reviewed yearly. 4. Number of outside personnel be limited to ten. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. Planning Commission tabled this matter until the Decembe: 16, 1985 meeting. ZONING AMENDMENT APPROVAL OF MINUTES* ^ ,It w'as moved by McDonald, seconded by Goetten, to approve tht Minutes of the October 21, 1985 Planning Commission meetinc as submitted. Motion, Ayes 6, Kays 0. COUNCIL MEETING REPRESENTATIVEPaul Taylor was appointed to represent the Planninc Commission at the December 9, 1985 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT 11:55 PM ^ jIt was moved by McDonald, seconded by Goetten, to adjourn th( Planning Commission meeting at 11:55 PM. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. MINUTES Oi-’ THK Krnur.AK ORONO COlTNCll. MHUTlNi; IIET.P DKlMMUER R, 198S I98S JAMP.r. K HERTES cnntinu<Ml Council stated th.it they would like the survey include the location of the house to the south. t c It was moved by Ccunci Imember Ilairmerel, seconded by Counci Iwerrber Adams, to table this matter until the January 13, 1986 mooting in order to amend the resolution incorporating the 20' setback between homes and pending a survey with location of adjacent h.ousc to the south. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. IQI^^’V r ANK KOKESn 41^ WATERTOWN HOAD CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT RESOLUTION #1894 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit for a public riding stable. Representing the applicant's was their attorney, Lou Oberhauser. He noted that the applicant has never rented horses to the public and ha^s had a maximum of 5 full-time employees. He stated that applicant felt that review of the condtional use permit annually was unnecessary. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission recommended annual review in order for the city to keep tabs on the operation. It was moved by CounciImember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Hutler, to adopt Resolution #1894 approving the conditional use permit and variance for a public riding stable subject to the following conditions; 1. The total number of full and part time employees hired by the applicant's to assist in the commercial horse operation shall not exceed the level of 5 employees except for events covered by a Special Events permit. 2. Horses maintained on property shall rot exceed the number allowed per Section 10.27 Subd. 4(A). Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT; CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE 15 A.R.I. CONTRACTING INC. , ^ » It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by CounciImember Frahm, to approve the Request for Payment #5 from A.R.I. Contracting Inc. in the amount of $35,887.89 for Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer improvement's. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. UOIM S mAHfi V ODERHAUSEH A ASSOCIATF S F'A A T 7 0<* ^ t rs A %f> v.Oc^^»rLC ^ AT LA\A ’4. ’ F %y/ata F30‘'' '< 9i:nr WAY^AfA ViNNt -> •% : D^cealxiir 30, 1^95 A -• J * t * •• i. r : NSf s •«. ^A:.( i CITY OF ORONO 1335 Brovn Road South Ecx 66 Crystal Bay, 55323 kttentionj^ Re: Conditional Use Pcnnlt/Frank »akesh Our File: 80l4~l Dear Ms. Mabusth: I h.,v« reviewed the Rerolutlon. 1 beltev. that a more correct deacrlptloo of the property would read as follows: The South 27.5 acres of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Northeast l/A of Section 31, Township 118, Range -3, lyim. North of the centerline of the Minneapolis and Watertown Road, the South ”'0 Rods of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/ Section 31, Townsh p U8, Range 23, lying ‘^’o^th of the centerline of t' Minneapolis and Watertown Road ^nd the West 316.5 feet of the South 1088.1 feet ^ of the South 27.5 acr-s of the West the -«st 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31, Township 118, Range .. , lying North of the centerline of the Minneapolis and Watertown Road. under Parrgrnph N<,, 4 of the Conclurlons, Orders nnd Conditions It wa^ny understanding that the ^ ^ f R„ :^;t;nrhI^hnnn Thfcondltlonal Use Pnrwlt on an annual basis. I respectively request that Paragraph So. 4 of the Conditions, be changed to a "review process" ratnor than a renewal process ■:ith the above Indicated corrections we would be In a position to executn .he Resolution and pay the balcince of the fee. If you have any questions, please give me a call. H©5 b t ) 1 ■U'!u\i j;sN3 ! 1 CITY OF OROMO Slncerelv LOUIS'^f^^ERHAUSER LRO/eJw cc: Frank Kokesh ,r^- TO: mOM: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. City Administrator Michael P. GafTron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE:September 13. 1994 SL^BJECT: #1953 William Allen. 3475 Livingston Avenue - Variance • Continuation of I\iblic Hearing Ust of Exhibits A - Updated Survey B Notice of Planning Commission Action S'19/94 C - Memo and E.xhi’oils 3/4/94 This item was tabled at your Augus" meeting in order that applicant provide an updated survey showing the as-built garage location, and for staff to review building separation and access issues with the Mound Fire Department. The updated survey confirms the location of the existing garage from the side lot line, ami ’ from the proposed addition. On the east side of the property, the neighboring residence is 10-12’ distant from applicant’s existing garage. On the west side, the neighboring property contains a carport located appro.ximately” 1’ from the lot line or approximately 7’ from applicant’s house, and in line with the rear of the existing main part of the house. The additions will not create an access situation anv better or worse than currently exists along the lot lines. Steve Erickson of the Mound Fire Department discussed this matter on September 7th with Jeanne Mahusth. He indicated they have no problem with the proposed 4' separation between house and garage, and noted that they would not be hindered in fire fighting efforts by the proposed additions. Further, any fire code separation issues would be resolved simply by creating the proper fire walls (i.e. anpropnately placed sheetrock). It appears that the fire safety and emergency access issues are suitably addressed, and the final determining factor whether to allow the 4’ separation is purely an aesthetic density issue. Does the proposed addition yield a visual density too great for this property, or out of character with the surroundine neighborhood? Options of Action 1. Recommend approval of separation setback, hardcover and side setback variances as proposed (note that no lot coverage variance is required due to the 1,500 s.f. allowance). 2. Table, requesting additional information or revision, 3. Recommend denial, stating reasons. Ollier. sessn V/' ;; r t ^‘V. ■ v;:i ■ ;;;• •t, \ . =j •i tpA Certificate of Survey for William F. Allen of Lot 10, Block S, Navarre Heights Hennepin County, Minnesota hWirkjS^on vncn A/enu^ BOO I I m I* no S. H-r ;; £«isf.A9 houst «i *■ ij£^ ..9J......... '»■ I H' 51 lit ^ y J ^ j t ^ AX. €•9! ■ / LEGAL OESCIUPTION OF PREMISES: Lot 10, Block 5, NAVARRE HEIGHTS. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house, existing garage and an existing portable shed. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. o; Iron marker Bearings shown are based on an assumed datum. 0)111\ k CKONBhKl., iNC 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Sur\ eyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota DATE ^.9 *94 SCALE --'v r-20' Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Nuflror 12755 toil NO. H-3^2 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Cnstal Ba>. .MN 55323 473-7357 ZONLNG FILE #1953 NOTICE OF PULNNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 8^18 94 TO: William F. Allen .1475 Livingston Avenue Wavzata, NfN 55391 COPIES TO:Phillip E. Payne 1708 Crosby Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 T^TE OF APPUCATION:Variance DATE OF MEETING: 8/15/94 VOTE:4 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons rawed below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Provide updated survey to show as-buill garage location. 2. Staff to review building Kparation and access issue with fire depaftment (Mound F.D.). 3. Staff to review Itx'ation of adjacent homes and fences. Planning Commission’s main concern was loss ot access to the rear of the property, and whether suitable cmcrgera;y access to the rear would still exist. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission Monday. September 19. 1994; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the otficial Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ch TO: FROM: DATE: M\0 Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. City Administrator ^anne A Mabusth. Building A; Zoning Administrator August 4. 1994 SUBJECT: #1953 William Allen. 3475 Livingston Avenue - Variances - Publk Hearing < a Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03, Subd. 12 - Separation setback Required = 10’ Existing = H’± Proposed » 4' (12" overhang of ikw addition plus overhang of existing garage creates less than 3’ separation) Variance *= 6 ’ or 60% 1 \ N Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Structural coverage for lots less than 1.99 acres in area Lot area “ 6,725 s.f. Allowed « 1,009 s.f. or 15% ( ’1-^ - ■ Existing *= 1,179.8 s.f. or 17.5% ProfK^sed =® 1,311.6 s.f. or 19.5% V’ariance = 302.6 s.l. or 4.49% O' Section 10.22, Subd. 2 Area = 6,725 s.f. Allowed “ 2,354 s.f. or 35% Existing = 1.899.8 s.f. or 28.25% Proposed = 2,131.7 s.t. or 31.7% No variance required Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B) - Side setback variance Required = 10’ Existing = 6 ’ Propi^sed = 6 ’ - Principal structure addition Propo.sed =^. 1" deck ' j ^ Vari.mce = 4' or 40% List of Exhibits A - Applic iiion B - Plat Map C - Property Owner ’s List D - Surve> E - Detailed/Enlarged Survey aie ' • U r 1^' F, c.^ \Vr I' Zoning File #1953 Aueusi 4, 1994 Page 2 F - Mardco^’er Facts G - Existing Floor Planw II - F’roposed Floor Plan 1 - Elcvation/Scciiffli J - Lakeshorc Setb^k Determination Description of Request Applicant premises the removal of the rear enirx addition at 8.5 '\9.9’ and replacement with a new entr> addition at I2’xl8* with a rear attached 10 x10’ deck. Refer to FAhibits D. E and II. lire new construction will extend no further into the substandard side yard than the existing structure at 6’. The proposed 12’xl8’ addition will be located less than 4’ from the existing garage; the grade level deck would be 8 1/2’. Upon your site inspection, note the overhang of the garage and review Exhibit I. The 1 ’ overhang will result in a separation setback of less than 3’ requiring special fire wall consta'ction. The propt>sed improvement results in an excess of structural coverage at 302.5 s.f. or 4.49%. Structural coverage exists at 17.5% and will be increased to 19.5%. Statement of Hardship Applicant has not submitted a statement of hardship and w ill be asked to provide one at v t)ur meeting. Hardships are obvious. Tlie lot is .15 acres in area and 50 ’ in width. Of the 18 Livingston Avenue lots designated on the plat map. Exhibit B. 11 or 61% of the developed lots are single lots equal to oi less in area. The propo.scd improvement is similar to the pattern of recent improvement to homes within the Navarre Heights area. Issues for Consideration 1. Is structural coverage excess proposed tcxi great tor this property? What ot the proximity' of other structures on the adjacent parcel? 2. Will you approve a separation setback of less than 3’? 3. Should the structural expansions be reduced? 4. Is the side setback of 6’ acceptable as long as it extends no further into the substandard vard? 5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Zoning Fik #1953 August 4. 1994 Pace 3 OptkHis of Action To ai^ros'e or anand as proposed; or To table provkling the applkani with clear directives so that an amended plan can be prepared for review' and action at a later meeting. chi » TO ^ r b / ^ 0c\ivC<L J C.- \ i ¥ \ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE AJM ’UCATION Initial Application Fe« S200.00 (S50.CX) per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conlonning structures S^OO.OO Aftcr'the*Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY CNFORxNLVTION Site Address SV7s ^ Property Identification Number tP.l D.i Lcr ,c , tcicr S Attach legal desenption to application if not included on required survey. Date Propern Acquired ___________^------------------------------- I (iV) (iiQjafli) also own the adjacent parcels ot land. Present use of propertv': V residential ___other (specify)_------------- Zoning District: CITY if OTiCsO OFFICC ir'* L-i.V Cf^Ch Ti 250.i*0u ajvf-i/v COVi kOl TOc (monitvyear) APPLICA iVD . Name ^ Address: //O? OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ Phone (liome) Phone(wcrk)________ City:Zip: Phonethome) Phone (work) Address:if-p'c City: Qjcc^/c DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST EstimatedConstnictionCostS ISI. CCO , X,,,r Dese^requestindetaUt or.' >uuj Acso (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width h Setback:Front ,< Side Hardcover Rear / Lot Coverage Averat Lakeshore Other (specify) H vrdship /descrlption of unusual property conditions ®due h„dship or practical d.ff.culty or unusual property coud.t.ons prevemmg compliance with Zoning Code requirements:------— (attach additional sheets if necessary) 1. •> 4M • 3. 4. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS of the following information must tx submitted bT the applicationudcadline date In QrdCC for vour applicatio n to be consMered complete: Completed Application Form Cenificd Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obuin this list from Hennepin Count>' Department of Finance. A-603, Govt Center, 34S-3271). Plat Map (obuined with property owners list). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include aardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i x 11 for reproduction. ... . . Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes m existing grade arc proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy x IT for reproduction.^ Sketches or plans of floor Sc elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8Vi" x 11 ). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest m the propert)’. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please atuch a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Propertv' Owner must sign this application. Please remember that iflUE variance aoplifation Is not completejf th^hove information |ias.jiot_bem'ncludfisL .APPLICANT’S SIGNATLTUE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng Admiihstrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by and/or consultant expenses incurred in review ot this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct todhe best of his/her knowledge. I _____Date _ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. .Applicant’s Signature C /f</ owner herebv acknowledges and agrees to this application and ftirther authoraes reasonable entry onto the property by City suff. consulunts. agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and venfication of this request. n,,. 7-g/- WOwner’s Signamre Aoblicant must have aU submittals into ±e City offices 25 days before the Planning Co^ission Meeting Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday or each mon^^ AppUcLts must be present at aU scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission Md Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, pl^ m^e arra^emenu to have ao authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buddmg & Zonmg Office of this change prior to the meeting. ,"r "V t u "T "S“‘IT “V"TT "IT ► m5 (32) 10 ^ ?9 1 1’43'. *,s .4%« / -'ll \ *s 7N ’5(IT) . C6),i’l .* I * ?✓ (40; d-■w /.y/ (>401 1 "lP 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Sp 19 9 J ?P P P 3 c '»?5 - <9 '•<9 20 7'a II 23 (35^191 r ( 40)(40)(4P.(41) 3 '••r /-r'd.//.(/ JL 9 9 t)9 %VD 9 DAKOTA < iHil M ,J.T' JL »l - (31) /. 9 ?.» » ^ >0 ?(50)(4f) (46) ? r 9 »3 i| 153 ___¥-^ <n 1? *r »T (53) •fl 3^ (47) (4«) (45) (44, #1 4A ?5 (f (M) JLi»VI ?|(5r) / Vi U » 3«? 9 VD L>RIC 9 ^3? ?k3B) (9 ?(43: * Uu o:: .'C < > < )(n>(73)77X78) tfl «r* ^t- 4 IT* (T9) (SO) #T f X , ?ln i »0T> » '3 . / )l 9 9^ 5 »rt 30 i„Sv* » ^ •jJJ CsJ-K »w ir a •51 m\ ',f >a 5^ (<03] .'O 50.4 ?l I i<3) - L ^ ' '0^)( ’Oil I w) 22 w» X 9 <'3 I 24 jb^Ls ri/" pi ^ X. (30) ^ I*'' ^ 3T«*^ p() II TT5? P( (09) •• 9-^*9 • f PD (91) (91) (93) (34) (95) ITS pi '0 (00X07) 9 *s X 19 C 3^ air.-.O-irT ?kS3) 1 9 (•6) 5« p4 9 V9 P( 21- '«/) ^1 I <n X X 24 * (90) 4 X isi) 25^ X IT ?09) 2214 DQC ^9 »>C470 • *■«;*• I T!rt 1, ^ i ^,\M i 1t..J " m I «i " ^ 5 ri ^ ^%r **W9i5 nef)6HNE—OR-^.-iwftiCSAt I ■ RUN DATE 07/1^/^ BATCH 002 PROP ADOR OltlER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER • / NAME/AODR 4 . ' : PROP AODR ' OMCR NAME JAXPAYER : NAME/AOOR V * PROP ADOR ; ; QlfCR NAME .' TAXPAYER '.ft* NAME/AOOR K*< PROP AOOR vT r t A 3S 17-117-25 ^5 001* 05472 LIVINGSTON AVE C T VERSAILLES ET AL CHESTER I MELODY VERSAILLES 5472 LIVINGSTON AVE MAYZATA m 55591 50 17-117-25 45 0019 05444 LIVINGSTON AVE FRANK H OLSON ETAL FRANK H OLSON 5444 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA m 55591 50 17-117-25 45 0069 05477 LIVINGSTON AVE M B SCHULTE ACM SCHULTE MARK B SCHULTE 5477 LIVINGSTON AVE MAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0075 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND BRADLEY J GLEASON PC BOX 52 NAVARRE m 55592 -vj ‘ OMNER NAME TAXPAYER . NAME/AOOR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 014,-ERS LIST 58 17-117-25 45 0017 03460 LIVINGSTON AVE KENRIC N LINDLAN GEORGIANA CARTALUCCA KEVIN BOE 5460 LIVINGSTON AVE MAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0065 05445 LIVINGSTON AVE DALE K UOENBERG CAROLYN M TILLOTSON 5445 LIVINGSTON AVE MAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 45 0070 05495 LIVINGSTON AVE VERA TEETZEL VERA TEETZEL PO BOX 216 SPRING PARK MN 55584 58 17-117-25 45 '^74 05472 LYRIC AVE BRADLEY JAMES GLEASON BRADLEY JAMES GLEASON 4540 ENCHANTED POINT RD MOUND m 55564 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 5 58 17-117-25 45 007* 05444 LYRIC AVE F L A S E MITTELSTAEDT MR/MRS FRAMC L MITTELSTAEDT 5444 LYRIC AVE MAYZATA MN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 002 -000ly ' f ■ ‘ . i 58 17-117-25 45 0159 05488 LIVINGSTON AVE LAG GOMEZ LUPE a GAIL GOMEZ 5488 LIVINGSTON AVE MAYZATA MN 55591 38 17 117 23 43 0064 03443 Livingston Ave Dennis L Heger Dennis L Heger 3443 Livingston Ave Wayzata MN 55391 58 17-117-25 45 0018 03452 LIVINGSTON AVE HILLIAM R MA^>«LL II A MIFE HILLIAM R MAXWELL II 5452 LIVINGSTON AVE NAVARRE MN 55391 58 J7-117-25 45 0068 05475 LIVINGSTON AVE HILLIAM F ALLEN A MIFE WILLIAM F ALLEN 5475 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 43 0072 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BEATRICE J HASSON BEATRICE J HASSON C/0 UNIVERSITY HEALTH CTR 22 27TH AVE S E MPLS MN 55414 38 17-117-23 45 0075 05468 LYRIC AVE JAMES F MITTELSTAEDT III JAMES F MITTELSTAEDT III 5468 LYRIC AVE HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-25 45 0141 05475 LIVINGSTON AVfi SARANNE N AfR)ERSON SAPANNE M ANDERSON 3475 LIVINGSTON AVE HAYZATA 55591 . CD Ul CO *V“ *, r I ,v * -'-t RUN DATE 07/19/94 BATCH 002 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY O^WERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 4 l !'I. m'- I. «^ (, CD ■■'I'D*- ) ^ i ' T . ?, 'i* *• V ♦ ‘ I. I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEf»4EPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNQHLEDGE AND BELIEF. ^ ^ ^7/v?y.,DATE :RTY TAXATION* TO THl . ..J , . < > >.• • t i •• ■ ^ ♦.r* y*'1. ■ !• C-. ■ 1 '• . 1 . . \t;V? •• ' ! ."■ < • I?' 7 Plit of* furv®7 for WiIU?n P. Allen of Lot If^, niorv j:.*»varr« nait:hts Hennepin County, Pdimcsota #403 •r r,r MS Seal®: 1" “ 30* Dat® : 6-l: -78 o : Iron irurkor f 1 $ V 4 «MU • . '4r.y * • % vis Cortlflrato of Su:-';cy: I h*»reby certify thut this Is a true and correct representation of a purvey of th*» boundHrioa of Lot 10, Bloe> 5, Mav<rro Heights, and the location of uLL existing btillcllngr. tliereon. It doop not purport to show other Improve ments or encro3chmr»ntp. Cordon H. Coffin He^064 Land Surveyor and Planner Lon^ LviPo, Minnesota > 1^1 ■ ■ t?» ■^■11 _____A____ y'€,n • • f : »- •n 50.0 • • 7?: I .1 I 4i 1/ f« f {■ • 9« • I it^ I c ••5* V 5' S'tis/ffli (^.7* IT* rr\ ^ 4 !€• li* -I '7 K.U Scale; Date : 1 ” r. 30* 6-l:--78 1t U .• N Certlf.icatr I hereb; a true and of a surve;. Lot 10, Blc and the loc b^iildingp . p\jrport to ments or er Gordon R, C I/ind Survev • Y *mmm. .mm T 0 » t 0 0^ Lor # 1 Pi O v-t__y MM * e ' 6'7<L>^^o J ' i * ^ ' N P ..-v ^ J 2/L H 1;uo r- :?fi /oo isrrr'_ - ^y. c^S.:i£'A cP<53/ *^- De^<fc I Ei 3/. 7 % •rv ••^ , :V.; -; .■■• ......... t* -i ■> ■ i:* *-'. f* ‘* •' ■ . ■■■ • •> ' * •; >: ■ • ,; *<<• . >• •-.. ■ .".J-- '■ • ■• V,'. . :■■ . '■ . v' -: .>• • • ' * ' ■ * ‘ y*‘ •'. u:^v- • ••'V' . .vj>: 'i* . • # ■ ' A .vv-v. y '^' ‘ ', . . ‘ '* * ■ ’ * *1* •■ ■ . . *•'* ^ r 7 TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, Citv Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE:September 12, 1994 SUBJECT: #1958 Louis Oberhau.ser, 2405 Dunwoody Avenue, 3865/3877 Shoreline Drive - Subdiv ision of a Lot Line Rearrangement/Replat, Class II Subdivision - Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Notice of Planning Commission Action 8/17/94 B - Letter from Hennepin County DOT 8/9/94 C - Letter to Applicant 5/24/94 D - Memo and Exhibits of 8/8/94 This application was tabled at your August meeting because applicant was not present. Shortly after that meeting, the applicant had a conversation with Jeanne Mabi sth at which time he noted that he planned to attend the September 19th meeting and would be submitting a written request (as yet not received) regarding future hardcover allowances for the properties. As of this writing, applicant has not signed the application or paid the required fee, as noted in Exhibit A attached. Hennepin County DOT in the letter of August 12th agrees with the access locations designated by Jeanne Mabusth in the previous staff memo. Henn/DOT also requests dedication of an additional T of right-of-way along Shoreline Drive, increasing their right-of-way to 40 ’ from the center line. This dedication would be consistent with the City’s approval of the plat of Navarro (the twin homes on Livingston and Lyric west of the water tower) in 1982, but inconsistent w ith the 1980 Comprehensive Plan which lists this section of Shoreline Drive as a "collecior" which requires only a 66’ right-of-way. Requiring applicant to dedicate that extra 7’ would have a significant impact on buildable area, especially for Lot 1. Staff is inclined to follow the Comprehensive Plan and recommend denial of the County ’s request for 7’ of right-of- way. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval per the recommendation on page 4 of the August Sth memo. Additional information provided by the property owner at the meeting should also be taken into consideration. Cj^lt CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1958 NOTICE OFPLANTVING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 8/17/94 TO: Louis Obcrhauscr 2425 Dunwoody Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION:Subdivision Lot Line Reamneement DATE OF MEETING: 8/15/94 VOTE:4 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECUL CONDITIONS: Applicant was not present. Two neighboring property owners were present. They were briefed on the proposed lot line rearrangement but no discussion was held. This item will be placed on the Planning Commission’s September 19 agenda for public hearing. Before then, it is imperative that you appear at the City Offices to sign your subdivision application and pay the $300.00 application fee. If you are unable to attend September 19, please send a representative in your place. If you or your representative do not appear at the September 19 meeting, and/or if you fail to sign the application or pay the required fee, your application will be considered as not valid, and the City will unfominately be forced to proceed with other options in order to bring your property into conformance. If you desire cenified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planmng Commission, ch - T V s,. •.’ ^ <y *%» ^ ^5. • / Hennepin County X. An Equal Opportunity EmpIo\cr ^ '?■•.a3»u Jeanne A. Habusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, HN 55323-0066 O'-' . n August 9, 1994 RE: Proposed Plat - Louis Oberhauser Subdivision CSAH 15, southwest quadrant CSAH 15 and Dunwoody Avenue Section 20, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 2171 Review and Recommendations Dear Ms. Habusth: Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: • For future improvements to CSAH 15 and for improvement to the sight lines at the Dunwoody intersection, the developer should dedicate an additional 7 feet of right of way for a total of 40 feet of right of way from and along the CSAH 15 centerline. • Site access as shown on the proposed plat and discussed in your leter of August 2, 1994 is acceptable: one access to CSAH 15 approximately 130 feet west of the plats northeast corner for proposed Lot 1 and access via Dunwoody Avenue for proposed Lot 2. The existing entrance located approximately 220 feet west of the plats northeast corner must be removed. The developer should contact Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548 for access information. • The developer must have an approved Hennepin County permit before beginning any construction within County right of way. This includes, but is not limited to building removal, drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for permit forms. The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction. Department of Public Works within County right of way. r • 320 Washington Avenue Si'uth Hopkins, Ntinnesi'ta 5534 3'846J: (6 12)930-2500 F.AX:(612)930-2513 Rciy. led PiifHrr r Jeanne Mabusth August 9, 1994 Page 2 Please direct any response to Doug Hattson. Sincerely, Thomas D. Johnson, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ/DBM 23 0066 ) ' > Oromi Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Mtx>rse, Citv Administrati>r Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building &, Zoning Adniinistfator August 8, 1994 #1958 Louis Oberhauser, 2405 Dunwoody Avenue, 3865/3877 Shoreline Drive - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement/Replat, Class II Subdivision - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.02, Definition 43 (b) - Lot width for lakeshore lots Section 10.25 - Lot standards for LR-IC zoning district. Review of Existing Lot Areas and Lot Width Required lot area = 21,780 s.f. or .5 acre Required lot width = 100’ measured at OHWL and at 75’ setback Parcel A Lot area = 7,600 +. s.f. Lot width = 35’ at OHWL. 49 ’ at 75’ setback Parcel B Lot area = 16,900 +. s.f. Lot width = 34’ at OHWL. 63 ’ at 75’ setback Parcel C Lot area = 12,000 +. s.f. Lot width = 50’ at OHWL, 50’ at 75’ setback Proposed Lots Lot 1 Lot area = 16,500 s.f. Lot width = 41.5’ at OHWL. 84’ at 75’ setback Lot 2 Lot area = 20,000 s.f. Lot width = 73’ at OHWL, 77.5’ at 75’ setback V' Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C) (1) - Structural setbacks Zoning File Jl^l958 August 8. 1994 Page 2 W 4. Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (C) (6) - Average lakcshorc setback. 5. Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover limiiaiions. 6. Section 11.03, Subd. 2 - Definitions. Definition 65 (c) - Subdivision approval required when lot line rearrangement involves lots that do not meet the standards of the zoning district. Definition 66 (b) - Class II subdivision. Subdivision may involve the vacation of existing drainage and utility easements platted along the existing lot lines, subdivision will involve the dedication of new drainage and utility easements along the newly defined lot line and sewer utility easements along west side of property, refer to Exhibit I. List of Exhibits A - Application B • Plat Map C - Property Owners ’ List D - Existing Development E-1-4 Options of Redevelopment Considered in 1992 Sketch Plan Review (Application #1769) F - Legal Description of Property G - Survey of Replat H - Gustafson Report I - Sewer As-Built Review of Application The current subdivision application involves the replatting of three separate parcels into two lots, review Exhibits D and G. The three parcels had originally contained four residential units, all units were rented by applicant. The properties are served with sewer and water and have been assessed for four units. In a 1992 sketch plan review, the City was asked to consider various options for development. Applicant preferred a Planned Residential Development of four units, refer to Exhibit E-1. Because of the special tiering requirements for the placement/location of residence structure within a PRD, multiple variance approvals would have been required by the Department of Namral Resources along with the City. Review Exhibits E-2-4, options of redevelopment of the property were considered ranging from a two unit PRD, replat oi three lots into two lots, and redevelopment of the three existing lots. If lots were to be developed in their current configurations, multiple and e.xcessive variances would have been required. The Zoning I'lle #1958 August 8, 1994 Page 3 Planning Commission encouraged a reduction in density to citter the two unit PRD or lot line rearrangement of two units. One member strongly encouraged applicant to consider combining all three parcels into one unit. The lot standards have been considerably improved w ith the proposed realignment. This subdivision does not involve ll» creation of new lots. The subdivision will result in the elimination of one existing lot of record. Access Review Exhibit E-3. During the 1992 sketch plan review, access for the two lot division was to be a shared access at Shoreline Drive. The relocated access along the proposed shared lot line would have been too close to the intersection of Dunwoody and Shoreline. The current application involves a single access to Lot 1 at the existing most eastern access at Shoreline. Access at Dunwoody is not shown nor is it recommended along the 55* of frontage. Staff must recommend that access be provided from applicant ’s homestead parcel, specifically the most northern curb cut of applicant ’s circular drive (review Exhibit H). The County has been asked to comment on the proposed subdivision. As of this writing, staff has received no written report but they have advised via the phone that they will seek a 40’ right-of-way dedication for County road - an additional 7’. The most eastern access is acceptable as it aligns with access on north to County shop area. If properties are to be developed, they would encourage the removal of retaining walls and garage within County right-of-way. Grading/Drainage/Flood Plain Review Exhibit G. Note the flood plain elevation is located close to Shoreline and will not have an impact on the future building sites. Any filling of the flood plain would have required compensatory filling mitigations on site and a formal review by the Watershed District. The City will ask for detailed grading and drainage plans with each redevelopment plan for the two lots. Existing Site Conditions The City commenced hazardous building actions against this property some time in 1988. The former residence on Parcel C was removed two years ago. The boarded up structures and deteriorated conditions on Parcel B are a constant source of complaints from surrounding residents, not so much immediate neighbors but residents of the Casco Point neighborhood and residents who regularly drive past the property on Shoreline Drive. The condition of the property and the boarded up structures continue to be a blight to the area. It is staffs understanding that several property owners may appear at your meeting in support of the replat which will eventually result in the redevelopment of the site. In any event, with the approval of this subdivision, the City must ask that the applicant/owner provide a schedule for the dates 2^ning File #1958 August 8, 1994 Page 4 on which the various boarded up structures and current rental residence are to be removed. Applicant may be allowed to keep residence at 3877 Shoreline Drive until building permit is to be issued for new construction on Lot 1 but the structures located now within the newlv proposed shared lot line must be removed as a condition of this subdivision approval. Riparian Use The three lots each have had residential docks. The two new'ly proposed lots will each be allowed a residential diKk. Municipal Sewer Refer to Exhibit I, it is not clear from the information submitted with the plat if the City has ever obtained easements over the multiple sewer lines that intersect the property. These lines must be shown on the plat and dedicated to the public if easements have not been granted. Recommendation To approve the lot line rearrangement of the properties IcKated at 2405 Dunwoody Avenue aiKl 3865/3877 Shoreline Drive, subject to the following conditions: I. Upon approval of the subdivision, applicant shall be responsible for the removal of the existing structures located on the newly proposed lot line. Planning Commission to make a recommendation concerning the required deadline for the removals of the two structures. a. Prior to the formal approval of the plat/final plat; or If applicant wishes to remove after final plat approval, applicant must execute a Subdivider’s Agreement and post the necessary Letter of Credit to assure that structures are removed within a reasonable period of time. b.Structure on Lot 1 may remain until building permit is to be issued for new construction or must be demolished at the time structures are removed on Parcel B. 2. Developer shall apply for the required demolition permit for houses and detached garage. Upon application for building permits for redevelopment of these properties, builder shall provide detailed grading and drainage plans to be reviewed by the City Engineer. Zoning File #1958 August 8, 1994 Page 5 3. 4. Access lo ^ 1 shall be via most eastern curb cut at Shoreline Drive. Access to Lot 2 shall be via an ca^ment from property granted in favor of Lot 2 over property located at 2425 Dunwoody Avenue. The owner of 2425 Dunwoodv Avenue shall be advised that the area of the easement shall be c.xcluded from lot area tor purposes of hardcover and lot area determination. Any hardcover improvements located with that easement will have no impact on hardcover inventory for 2425 Dunwoody. Dedication of drainage and utility easements along exterior lot lines and 5’ alone shared lot line. 5.Designation ot a 20 ’ sewer easement and if an easement does not e.xist, easement shall be dedicated on the plat. 6. Other conditions suggested by Planning Commission. r 1 jF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPDICA^ON ^PERTY LOCATION Site Address, -> i-fT ~S/£lc. u Property identification liober (P.l.D.) Please check cne - Property abstract or torrens? Attach lecal descri?t.j:r__to_appiication^- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Phone (hccie) applicant Name I OWNEH Address: (if different than applicant) A. V^v. =,_ _ /' 1*^ city Phene (work)- - -- - - - - - - ^ \ , ^ "■ i n I . -S' 3 /Ltv: \i -/ - - - - - -— Phone (heme) Phene (work) Name Address:City: rr 4rr 4 ^ • (attach lisr xt more than uue) existing land use Number of Tax Parcels 3 Development Size e3 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential? no. of units Other (specify)- - -- - - Present Zoning District ^ P- ~ ^ ~ PROPOSAL 7 Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Cnly (no new building s-t*s) subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites:Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per > Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land l/^ Residential ^ Other (specify) •fIMOM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION Comoletcd Application Form Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. ^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348**327X) • As an add'endum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. rtification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is Datenplete. ling Official’s Signature Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. 'tification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete, ling Official’s Signature^_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Date_ __ _ _ _ _ _ zs Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I &Subdivision^ Preliminary Review (Class III &^all~^n-residentia 1) Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) 175.00 Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 150.00 100.00 mnina Commission and Council necessary to process this application and •ther agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. licant’s Signature Date er's Signature Date licant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 :S"'Mond°^^ff eTchtfo^^^^ AVp^licants°S^st^be''pre^^ scheduled •iew meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applican ble to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to . horized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & zoning ice of this change prior to the meeting. J r ■ i'J * J ~*«?->iv- ^‘ii:• r» •• < 4iBi; • *(t9ii • 1 r.:%r;i ( (44r(*^-S '"■ COUNTS C2) ? CO # — •..... ««c Bi • •^ 1 * 1• » 1 1 » «4 X I t%• • 1• 1 •- « f?^ ^5)(6)£(’\| •« 1• 1• • 1 : i • 15 • !_____ry . , ,9^— i 'J- ?*. ------------- , ^ ***- fiirni*i^l 1 • ■■ ■■ mm MTi■' MTCN MS ntnnern coum ttcvcKTY nrwunoN ststeh^KOrERTY 0»««RS LISTMOP AMR OMCR Nile TAMPAYER tttfC/AMR\>. .MW AOMmmn hamTAWAYfllNAHi/AOMfU'.' • ^U.PROP AOORI • •! - ‘ MIOP AOOR .1 •.4 , OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAtC/AOOR V . MW Aom ; CNNIR HAM TAWAYiR NAHi/AOM Y«* ONMIl NAM TAWAYfll NAHi/AOM ■t . • .:a ♦ > vj V ‘ .V ■ IT 17-117-ES 55 M57 059M SNORELXIC OR J J CARI.SaN ADI CARLSON J J CARLSON ADC CARLSON S9M SHORELINE OR SPRXNB PARK M4 S5SM17 17>117-25 55 00A5 OS9M OEL OTERO AVE J N RAOATZ ETAL JOHN HENRY OABATZ 5MO OEL OTERO AVE SPRZNO PARR M< 555MSA 17-117-ZI 55 0M5 OSMO SHORELINE OR COUNTY OP HENNEPINC/0 MEtM CO - p.s. on5EO NASHINOTON AVE S HOPKINS Ml 55545 50 17-117-25 55 05050 SHORELINE OR S KATAXNEN A 0 L RATAINEN STEPHEN KATAINEN M7 PAYNE AVE ST PAUL Ml 55101 SO 20-117-25 21 0010 02420 OUNNOOOY AVE CALVARY HEHORIAL CHURCH CALVARY HEHORIAL CHURCH 2420 OUMRXMY AVE MAYZATA MN 55541 SO 20-117-25 22 0005 05905 SHORELINE DR RICHMD AbOLPH CARLSON RICHARD A CARLSON 5905 SHORELINE DR SPRIN6 PARK HN 55504 ^ 9 IT 17-117-25 55 005S 05fU SHWClINi W DOUGLAS C GAMBLi DOUGLAS C GAMLi 5flA SNODELlNi M SMIHG PAm m S5sm17 17-117-25 55 00A405Y10 D€L OTIiO AVt ROSEIIT DOSS HOUGH it At DODCiT HOUGH IfZlS LAMSfMII AVI HAilNC ON ST CHOiX Itl 5SM75S 17-117-25 55 05S90 SI«»iLINi Oi i J A H J HELD EDNAHD J A MARSHA J HELD 5090 SHORELINE M HAYZATA tfl S5591 S0 17-117-25 55 0007 05000 SNORELINi M JANET N (H.SON JANET H OLSON 5000 SHORELINi OR NAYZATA m S5591 50 20-117-25 22 0001 05925 SHORELINE OR M G MHINSRl LEONARD F LAM0ERT 5925 SHORELINi DR SORING DARK MN 5550A 50 20-117-25 22 OOOA 05095 SHORELINi OR R 0 JENSEN ETAL J A S RAUSCHENDORFER 5095 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA MN 55591 REPORT NO. PIA55A01 PAGE 1117 17-117-25 55 00590592A SHORELINE DR CLARR R OLTNAN CLARR R OLTNAN 5929 SHWELINE DR SPRING PARR M 5550950 17-117-25 55 000205000 SHWELINE OR CO OF HENN ORONO MAINT STATION C/0 HENN CO - P.S. DAG 520 HASHIN6T0N AVE S HOPRINS HN 5559550 17-117-25 55 0005 05090 SHWELINE DR DAVID UM0ENQCRER DAVID UMDEHOCRER 5090 SHWELINE DR MAYZATA MN 55591 50 17-117-25 59 0009 05790 SHWELINE DR PAUL N LARSON PAUL N LARSON 10 SHWELINE PL SPRING PARR MN 55509 50 20-117-25 22 0002 05955 SHORELINE DR J i S 0EDELL JAMS DAVID BEDELL 5955 SHWELIM DR SPRING PARR MN 55m =te ‘' '^ %% I* • so 20-1I7-ZS 22 0005 05915 SH0R2LINC ON IM SASKATCHEHAN ACQUISITIONS Ml SASKATCHCNMI ACQUISITIONS 5412 DORON OH EOINA Ml 55459 V NUN MTl•AtCN MS' :!r TAXSAVtKNM«/AOM»: V S« tt-U7-ZS 22 eOM•sarr sMONtUNi onUMU • OKHNAUKK L » OKMUUSCR ms 0UNMOOOY AVf NAYZATA m S5S91- % V ':'v!;i<42^ «J ->TAXSAV1R SS tO-Ur-2S 22 MM tms AVIUSAS • QMRNAU5IR UMIS • OMNNAUSf R AVINAYZATA m ISS91NAW/AOM 2A2S OUMCOOV>• 9. *• t.V• : PROP AMR■ TAMPAYIR • f^NAIC/AMR ‘ s- sa 2t-117-2S 22 0012 02AS7 OUlODOOY AVf NARION O Of ISf HARXON O KXSC tOS7 DUIICOOY AVf NAYZATA m 5SS91 -S'* \ f * •; ( '■f :■ i - - , .• . , t* . i*;-- ;• • 1. • ; • •• • • • F» 4 « ' • • • r * ’ ■i-'r-.',n\ r* \ '.r. - • • ' 1 ' # • ' • * A 1 - » V' . . . - * ■» NEItCPXN COUNTY PPOPfRTY INFONmTION SYSTtH PROPtRTY ONNflS LIST30 20-117-2S 220304S SNORfLINE OR RATNfltlNE nC NANARA LOUIS » CRimAUSCR 242S DUiDOOY AVf NAYZATA HN 5SS91SA 20-U7-2S 22 0010 02A3S OUIOPOOY AVf NARION O HlSf JANES C 011 SC 2ASS OUMCMOY AVf NAYZATA 55591SO 20-117-25 22 0015 02A4S OUNHOOOY AVE R V UmCNOCKER ETAL RQKRT UMKNOOCER 2AA5 OUNNOOOY AV NAYZATA M4 S5591 REPORT NO. PAM PIA5SA0112 -V50 Z0-117-2S 22 000002A05 DUMRXIOY AVf LOUIS • OKRNAUSCR LOUIS • OOERNAUSCR 2AZ5 DUMOOOY AVf NAYZATA fO< 55591SO 20-117-25 22 MU 0ZAA5 DLPMOOOY AVI A 0 NELSON ETAL ALVIN 0 NELSON 2AA5 OUNNOMY AVE NAYZATA m SS591TOTAL OATCN MS 00024 1 CERTIFY TNAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS tfATl ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE PEST OF NY KNONLEDOE AND BELIEF., I DATE M jjidOi/) CJl S' 00 i, V*. iic ' -i' 1 ’•V . .A? ‘ A . rf'i • rv s T • I . . '• i ^4- •! \% ■9 * r.<• M41' 4# • V- •» • *;.v.- ,f(r> ma> ‘ .1 • • . V • > U4 ' O : "? 9 -r M -^ ^ '• (• I % ' J» \\\ ‘i*-\\\ i<5\ 1 1 \V'^ oO> .s\ /C. • IIStS.'W.'S;“m” ^V.SiiLr.rrsi'siisra -IM >• foll««: ticlalnt •» > ?l?5I?%rw of wM U» 1; tl«*o ■iHtiii^^ *y.iS <M>•!<■« tte Ihrlb If *•* f/ifTwoTH ollk f Wyf—tir*" **“ “* *** *•I m ItMl nflHUflB PumiM■ fcwi my •— —7'^*• 25 ET.’LSLJ-s’SI^ 2S555.irgro, ~rr °«»^.!gJLHr;gJ!grs=.^J. *ly alooc f fcrfootorll If •• ••^ ^ s*f of flonf- I. IWt ■•rt of Lot* I •<■• 2, Block 8. -■■■■ -»- — —If lot 2 <Uaft 5.00 ff «»Uf*f lyf IbrtJHMi cocMT of 0014 lot 2: fwo • ^ f fotf of *11 wff f Wf» —* -. It f* not *i»*ort «• *•■ f >" la rolatloa to f ft 1 to a <Bily mr oor»uF *“* tto fa of f Stoto of Bi •ySjfJLr^^taito^Mnrtf^. Mferj t«9 Lite.*#'•»***• Dato : 10-0-90 Seal*: 1* s 20' w'r-s3:^Sg:j r.rt a-^ •.'■o‘--;- . ' ^ ■tr^ */ ‘ if r 'lj .r > Vi <. •'Jf *-4' j i • 4IU aBjfea^f'i6Ww i a.' >. »-. */f/r •»^-- a^ . Bonestroo Rdsene Anderfjk& Associates Engineers & Architects August 8, 1994 OllB 6 fenegpe Pf to»*t ilr tpsene Pf • C Pr^OM Pf M«»V»n i. kirvjMI »| I Twf^ H C-enn f C«* P| ( Noyvi Pf ■W»»f G Schirwfc Pf kiiwri M EdPPw C PP Co»^Swll*r«c "-HSiMeS P Pf PTPP P GePSOP Pf A^tMPT t P%»Ptn|f Pf 9 k*'<4»>C A' Pc«P' Pf D m C u>«m Pf C tusipp A f A P 9ok0mon pf M»r« A Narsem Pf fAut?n*rp Pf ¥« « p£ f .Anar»%or A r a Omm C i^p^M Pf ThOP*^S p Pf } !igneorg. pf ^-ppi ippfmt Pf VAhAP. p P€ %pnpi M A C P yir P>^wi i«3P Pf PAthjr C pf ipnws t Pf ip^ C Pptns^ Pf ko« j PA9Ar««, Pf P AfXWnsy' Pf Me»A • Mk Pf SAirt A Ipu Pf G(ir> \ir P^Aawgw, Pf P»m J Gjnrw A i A D at^ i f Pf * »c» k*»rn«Jl Pf PhAP J C«MiP« Pi Maai O Pf MriPS I Pf I P“A»p G»Awew Pf t A Pf G«rv C An«aftt Pf r ibsM «w Pf PMP t ywa pf OcX^wJiAl ' fP-AM Pf D GuiUi^WP Pf Cplap 0»ap Pf PpMl G » 4 M» Pf JBPP P CMn Pf CAPPW A l^fcWVS IPO M PpMP'Siuy Ninar M Oao« jpmn f fni|pp\««ai n Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Louis Oberhauser Lot Rearraneemeni File No. 139-1957 Dear Jeanne. M^e have review'cd the proposed lot line rearrangement prepared for Louis Oberhauser in Lots 1 and 2, Block 8, Townsite of Langdon Park. The rearrangement is acceptable, however there are several issues that need to be addressed. The property presently has two gravel driveways out to County Road No. 15. The easterly access (center of prc^rty) would be acceptable for the westerly lot. The easterly lot should have a separate access out to Dunwoody Avenue. This access would best be accomplished by acquiring an easement over a corner of the southerly property directly adjacent to Dunwoody Avenue. In this location, the existing bituminous driveway could be modified to provide a joint access out to Dunwoody Avenue. An existing sanitary sewer crosses through the property, westerly along the lake and northerly along the west lot line (see record plan sheet A126). The sewer is approximatelv 8 to 9 feet in depth which will not allow a full basement without changing the site significantly. The existing sewer should be show n on the certificate of survey. Water service is available along the south side of County Read No. 15. Drainage and utility easements will be required 5 feet wide along all lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of-ways. Existing easements for the sewer line should be shown on the certificate of surv'ev. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 m'iAAmM^-b>:^•= \n lOTi ’ ••i5i5i.«h.!iT{?'':uIi,«/““ •4 A.*i* * lAllOOt ^All V ^ •. : rrJ^;ff.ji :x u >» <3 ooKJ T y OA.O o. *3 3 . \ Li fjftAt. rgnTBiPTif A. That |«rt of U>t» I «nd 2. Bl<jck 0. Tiwnslt» uf LkncJon i'«rk. dem-rited •« (ult'-wa; (4«M#>rM.in# a* 'h*- NorUicaal corner of said Lul 2: thanes un aa aaausad bearing ->| rirat a)oi>4 th** Horth lirva uf aald U^ta 1 ari>i 2 a <Jiat«n--* <>f 1*>J 0<* to th» |•li^1 of brgtnntnf of iha r^)|«riy to ba dca4^ril«d: thanca cr«nt tnutng on a braring of Maat a dtatanca of f i.iil faat. thanr# South 2H da* fraaa 4A ainutaa Maat to lha ahora nf Htnnat'miia; thanca aouthaaatarly alpn# aaM ahora t* an liii^ra>*(tion uith a lina baartng South V dafraaa 04 atnutaa W-m frru tha point 4‘f haginnInA. lharv:a Horth .’«t lagrean 04 aimit*-a tast to tha point of bag Inning B. That t'art of Uita t an<J 2. block t|. T amahti of Langd^n 1‘ark. iaairibad ae folltwa; Baginning at a |«>.nt In tha Horthaantarly Una of aaid Ujt 2 <llatant b. JO faat :> <••» hraatarly fr-u tha Horthaasl *.-ornar nf aald list 2; tharv a n<«rthw»atarly b.OO fa#-t t», tha Herthaast c-smar of aald L/st 2: thanra jn an asa^aad tearing of Maat alung tha Horth llna <>f aald hit 2 a diatanca of 163.On faat; thanca »uwth dagraaa 04 ainutaa Maa' to tha alior* of l^ka flinratonka; thanra a<H<thaaatarly al->ng said alvjra to an In* teraactlon oith a lina nmnlng aouthwantarly frt« th* |uint of baginolng and parallal ulth tha Suuthaaatarly llna of aald LaI 2; thanca nnrthanatarly ahing aald parall*'! llna t. »ha ;• int ..f ta>ginnlng. C. That |ori of h t 2. Bl'«.k A. Tounalta >f Langdon I’ark. dantribad aa fo|l<iwa; Ragtnnlng at a point lu 'ha Hnrthaaatarly line of sail lot 2 distant *■ <"»» f<»at aoMthra«t*rly fnm tha H rthaaat <rnar rf {»^id l.it 2: th^O'a s« •itttw*^.nrr ly forailvl with tfia Stnith^aatar ly lina f aald U>t 2 t* th« sh<r* of lAka flinnatirjia. thane southeasterly along said ah ^ra to tha SnutV»*astar ly lint of aald h>t 2. tfieni* norih^aatai 1/ along said So>«theaat»ny line to the anal taalerly < ornar of said Ud 2; then » north uaatarly along the Hfrlhaaatarly llna d aald L>1 T to 'he {aMn' >f l^ftnnlng. T1<la S'lrvey ahiua ifie Iitratinn of all ailat,lng bullillnga and vlaibla hardeevar in relall-ei the hyuivlar leg of tha alnve scribed yroperty. It duss not purport to il«a« any other •nrroa-.'Naenta *>r isimvausnts. I hereby certify that this survey uas pre|eie<l by aa or •in*lar sy direct aupervlalon aivt that I as a dkily ftagiaterad lAnd Surveyor under the leire sf 'he Slala of HUuwecte. GDfm i I. IK. • •»1- ■ +• ^yt|Vi, MgnneM lon$ kat.lllnntloU ■Igringi^ll^Tf V'o\V‘?it^ \ isk.va'el-d.i-tl ^4r , . •' ■->' • -yj |0-»-5« I 1 20 ’ o: IroH tisi-fear leu Scale; 1 2 20 A . >•■ i • % N \ I r ..■■/if' A note: section OF MH 2.(NOT I SECTION A IS ALL SEWER SEI TO BUILDINGS r • \ To:Chairman Schroeder and Orono Plaiming Commission Members Ron Moorse. Cir\ Administrator Fnmi: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 13, 1W4 #1959 James W, Ogland, 3345 Crystal Bay Road - After-ihe-Fact Variance Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Application: After-the-f^t request to allow an existing storage shed to remain located partially within a public right-of-way and not meeting the required side or rear property line setbacks. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - 0 - H - 1 - Application Plat Map Property Owners ’ List Neighbor Acknowledgements Letter of Request Photos Survey Miscellaneous Correspomlencc Staff Hardcover Calculations Pertinent Code Sections and Requested Variances 1.Section 10.03. Subd. 14 (E & F) - Accessory struemres require a 5’ rear yard and 10’ side yard setback from the property line. (Shed straddles lot lines.) Section 10.03. Subd. 14 (C) - Lot coverage by structures limited to 15% or 1,500 s.f. including only house and garage. (Existing lot coverage including shed is 1,085 s.f. or 19.1%.) 3.Section 6.07, Subd. 4 - Locating or maintaining a structure in any street is not allowed [The term street is synonymous with the term public road as defined in Section 6.01, Subd. 1 (L)l. 4.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 Sc-ciion 10.56. Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover limitations. (75-250’ zone in which shed is kveated is at approximately 50% hardcover.) J r Zoning File #1959 September 13, 1994 Page 2 Background Applicant constructed a 100 s.f. shed in 1991, noted by the Inspections Department in 1992. The shed is located partially within applied’s property, partially within the right-of-way of Hillside Place, and partially on the Dakota Rail property (see survey). Hillside Place is a public right-of-way dedicated in the plat of Wallace’s Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, and in which the City maintains a sewer lateral serving portions of the ncighNarhiKHl to the south. The Hillside Place right-of-way is not open to public travel, and has been maintained to be perceived as a lawn by Mr. Ogland and his iKighbor to the east. In the fall of 1993, Mr. Ogland and his neighbor Mr. Stoyke applied for a vacation of Hillside Place and after review by the Planning Commission withdrew the application si^e it seemed the DNR was strongly opposed to such vacation. Mr. Ogland is now requesting a variance for the location of the shed, preferring to leave it in its current location rather than place It within tte property boundaries. Please review the exhibits, especially Mr. Ogland ’s letter of request and the survey. Also note the following; The Public Works Department would as a minimum require that the property owner execute a Hold Harmless Agreement if the structure is allowed to remain on the right-of-way. There is. f course, a remote chance the City would have to excavate in Hillside Place to repair or maintain sewer line, and the City would certainly retain the right to move or have the owner move the shed if it was in the way. The City has no authority to grant Mr. Ogland approval to keep his shed on the Dakota Rail property. If the shed is allowed in its current location, the City should condition such approval on the applicant obtaining an easement or as a minimum, written permission from Dakota Rail for such encroachment into their property. Attributing the entire footprint of the shed towards lot coverage for applicant s property, the shed constitutes an excess in lot coverage. While the allowed lot coverace is 15% (or 1.500 s.f. including only house and garage), applicant ’s lot coverage with the shed is 1,085 s.f. or 19.1%. A variance is required for lot coverage. Hardcover was not calculated by the applicant but appears to be in the 30% range in the 0-75 ’ zone and around 50% m the 75-250’ zone including the entire area of the shed. If the shed is ultimately approved, a thorough hardcover inventory for the entire property should be required of the applicant. jg%. Zoning File /ri959 September 13, 1994 Page 3 Options Tor Action 1 Recommend approval of variances to allow the shed to remain at its current location, coraiitioncd on execution of a Hold Harmless Agreement by the applicant, submittal of an easement from Dakota Rail, and applicant to submit hankover calculations. 2.Recommend that the shed be moved to a ditferent location and recommcndi approval of the necessaiy hardcover and setback variatKes. 3. Recommend that tte variaiKes be denied and the shed removed. Table for additional information. 5.Other. L-'-: il crn' OF ORONO - varlance application Initial Appl’cation Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewa^ Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-ihc-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY ESTORAUTION Site Address Ct^lfSTAC 6^ C- </ ^ I 4 . •*T-v .**r ^ ^ t I w* WJ^U'flW 2* * * r-err?."f iL^Property Tdentification Number (P.I.D.) n- 111 y/ - 1. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survev. Date Prsgrty Acquired /^Y?______________ (month.veatf- 1 vdo)(fdo notj)also own the adjacent parcels of land i.~CwA * . t * w w k w W V' V' V V ‘ •V» -i, VV Present use of property: \ residential ___other (specify-)f f t Zoning District:it}- APPLICANT . Name CO- C)^LA^/y£> F^ne (beyne) Phone(work) Address: Citv: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _________^ .Address: Phonethome) Phone (work) City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQLTST Estimated Consimction Cost S Describe request in detail: CR. ______________( 5^<g ____________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY COxNDinONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:_____________________________________ /yiAruX-yL^ t^7~. f4/c (^.Serg-*^ J (attach additional sheets if necessary) / :d submittals ^--------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------L±M fl#-j “'culations as requ^d"^,''’ hh- * “d include h., h repiWuction. •■‘^didon. provide one (!) copy 8W-% T?”I" '• - Topographic survey (e,j.,;„„, ^ ■t 11 for ^ rS?dden?uLrrS ™’ -=szs^bsb::::~~ '--------^•’^dlflUsesnjacLuje^ by use Zoning OVVNER'S SIGNaTITre «t,yp"^"Xemr'arv" aff T“ r PPP'-PPdon and (unher auth ■ ' PP'PC- Of hryeiriganon an^r”;?„r ^f 2^“ Owner’s Signature . /. j /O y W have an auihorized Ln^nen^^^ " P scheduled naettine nfj!f^* Commission dds change prior to ite meeting. “ 'o advise the Budding 8 (61)^ M P .eg A (24)(») 9 I RUN RATE 07/27/f^ ' BATCH 001 RORCPIN county RROPfllTY INfORHATXON SYSTEM W««tTY QNT^SS LIST MO.PAG€ 1fCMSR NAME^ TAXPAYER . MANE/AODl'0-♦'i U 17-117-23 41 OOlf 03329 CRYSTAL BAY RO D L NECKS A J M9LTZ DIXIE LEE MEEKS 3329 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 5S391 SB 17-1X7-23 91 W* 05555 CRYSTAL BA LARRY M NELSON LARRY H NELSON 5555 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 5» 17-117-25 91 002105539 CRYSTAL BAY RO RATRICK 0 O'FLANAGAN OCRULO J STOYKE 5339 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 • ‘PROP um ; OMNER NAME r TAXPAYER :' NANE/ARM M 17-117-EJ 41 OOZZ 0SS4S CRYSTAL RAY RR JAMES N OGLAND JAMES N OGUam SS45 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA m S5191 SB 17-117-23 41 0023 03344 CRYSTAL BAY RO HARRCN L PASCHKE MARREN L PASCNKE 14441 VILLAGE MOODS DR EDCM PRAIRIE MN S5347 38 17-117-23 91 002903355 CRYSTAL BAY RO J0««4 E RUST JOHN KUST3355 CRYSTAL BAY ROAO HAY2ATA MN 555*1 * 9 •, 9, ONNCR NAME • W TAXRAYER *}■ lttfC/AI»R 3B 17-117-23 91 0025 03359 CRYSTAL BAY RO • 6 GUMP A J L SECHRIST B 0 GUHR A J L SECHRIST 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 99 001903395 CRYSTAL BAY RO J R LOFRANO ETAL J R LO FRANO 3395 CRYSTAL BAY Rt> HAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 94 00990003B ADDRESS UNASSIGFSO C H PALMER A B J PALMER CHRIS A BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RO ORONO MN 55391 r- RROR AlWR OMCR NAME TAKRAYER NAME/AOOR '**'4 • ■* 'w ■ '..s ' Vi .■ " * ’ }.*■ '.vv . . ... •*’ H, *.• I *7• ■-rmm s ' y. j * * « . t* ‘ ^ v' il . J ♦ ' ”f • i SB 17-117-23 99 0109 03290 NAVARRE LA CLAIR T A LYNN 0 ROOD CUIR A LYNN ROOD 2215 KENNOOD HAY HAYZATA MN 55391 ■ . * A TOTAL BATCH 001 OOOIOI I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COLNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGC AND BELIEF. DATE * • • I if * P ■ '■A ,* i i '. 'V •l.-jv*,. .*• • A S t '• irV. \ ■i . I A C TO:CITY OF ORONO FROM: RE: JIM OGLAND, Property owner STORAGE SHED, PERMIT, EASEMENT, ETC. 334S CRYSTAL BAY ROAD DATE:August 23, 1994 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Allow existing storage shed to part ially sit on ’’Hillside Place” (a twenty five foot wooded, unused fire access lane) sandwiched between two residential houses. Give consideration to granting permission, by aeans of a "permit or easement," to allow the shed to remain as is in its present location. BUILDING PERMIT: When this shed was built (1991) I contacted the City of Orono and was told that a Building Permit was not needed for an accessory building (shed) that was under 120 square feet. This storage shed is under 100 square feet. Instead of putting up a Menard/Knox type barn shed I decided on a shed that was more attractive and seemed to better fit the character of the house, etc. FIRELANE: This adjacent parcel was originally platted as an access for fire equipment to get to the lake. It has never been developed or used as such and has been maintained as yard by the adjacent property owners for over 80 years. In earlier discussions with Public Works Director John Gerhardson, (who was met with on site twice) has indicated no objection to vacating this parcel nor objections to an easement regarding the shed. The shed is mobile and could be moved at such time as might be needed to work on the sewer or if the railroad were to request it be removed from their right-of-way. HARDSHIP: The only possible location for a shed on the property is this corner of the lot. For many years there was an outhouse on this very spot. It was followed in the fifties by a storage area for fireplace wood and a fishhouse. The lot and house are small, and additional storage space is desperately needed to store lawn and garden equipment, bicycles, outboard motors, lake and dock equipment, tools, etc. The terrain is quite steep and as a result, there is a large rock retaining wall (three or four foot high) on this rear corner of the property. It is also the Northern boundary line for the Dakota Railroad track. sf\continued I Page 2. . . .Ogland^ shed •I’here are fences and metal stakes that appear to define the property lines. My mother had a garden here for close to 50 years. As is often the case, a land survey done March 15, 1993, shows the real property lines, and of course the storage shed being not entirely within the lot description. My family has maintained the lane as if it were our own all these many years. In addition to the terrain and rock retaining wall, there are mature trees and shrubs that effectively dictate the location of the shed. It would be difficult to locate elsewhere. In its present location it is relatively obscure, hidden from view and in all aspects, is an important and necessary part of the property. It is well constructed and its appearance is an asset to the neighborhood and the community. CX)ST: I have now incurred expenses in excess of $1000 for Orono required fees, surveys, etc. Survey Application for vacation Property owners list, variance 150 ft. Legal description for Vacation Additional survey for sewer & manhole Property owners list, 500ft vacation 2nd Property Owners list, variance Variance application $1,255 A portion of the Vacation application fee was returned. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 3, * y Jr •V - ‘ * -i -r‘^>jf ^rf ►' •*A ^£Sii^»?;ir'''';^.^ ■ ■ i w ■'•W?m- > ' Wfc « *'« * • *1^£9(\ J* It ' ■v'lr^jF? ^ * \# *1 ’ ** ^.7 —-^ »'<:>•^ ^^i ^ , - '■‘.■'t-i?^^ii 3^- t f ‘A I % ■'rv^* _: I-. ' sx»,* .• ..^^1 ' ■ •' «i •-V^' ^-7' -V.-.. A;v *■ ■_ ■ *«•’ . A V'^ 'AN* '‘<1 -.i A JSS ■( *?"'‘'i: * / -- - - - - A Dt*A\^lfHennepin County, Minnesota AH^A Of 0-19^ ^ ■7^^K. SO ~ / hyso s.H j /\rtBAf of ^S*'^ZSO 2on^ ^ (f2.S'fW.3') ,-----£---- x5^ ^ (1^20 5/r] -ftxe Mimefonta o Existing Legal Descrioton Lot 9, WALI.ACK'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH relltiortJ[ "’’a exir.tinq buildings inrelation to the boundaries of the above drr.cri hod prooertv croa°hLnt^‘’“"'’°'"' i'"Provon«nts^or on- •: Iron marker found o: Iron marker set z S<gots, b7S0 s.f=^ yO Z^ne- - \l‘^20 S f: io CITY of ORONO MorMripri Oftkgs Pm Office Bo««6 Cr>^ Ba.% Miniiewtt ■<>f * February 12, 1993 X*- / Mr. Junes W. Ogland 3345 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Storage Shed Construction Dear Mr. Ogland: Late last summer the City notified you of building and zoning requirements relating to two storage sheds constructed on your property without budding permits. .As of this date, this issue remains unresolved. This letter is to require you to remove the storage sheds or apply for the proper permits and/or variances before April 1, 1993. If this deadline is not met, the City may issue citations and initiate further legal action. If you have any questions, contact Jeanne A. Mabusth or myself. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerelv, Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Adm. Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector TELEPHO>X - 47>'7357 • FAX • 47J-0f 10 •4«17l Certificate of Survey for James Ogland of Lot 9, WALLACE’S ADDITION TO T!!E VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA DEACH Hennepin County, Minnesota AHiA OF 0-19 ' = / 3>7SO s.p] oF '7£'-Z ‘5o' Z<pne- ( ‘f-2.9 f ?)‘/.3 ') ^ I \i^2o s.e] _&l<e Minnetonka Existing I.egal Descripton Lot 9, WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA DEACH This survey shows the location of all existing buildings in relation to the boundaries of the above described property. It does not purport to show any other improvements or en croachments . •: Iron marker found o: Iron marker set 4^e0 z S4CO t S^, /Tfi -s'* COFTIN k GRONBERG, I\C. . '* I 'f>u 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Sur\'eyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I If K» \ i'i<.i • l .'ii^LtKi \l\ '•>: r'> 0 41 Mark S. Cronberg Minnesota License Nuniber 12755 DATE 3-15-93 SCALE |“s 20' lODNo c]2 -78 *7 7 r 23 0066 ______________ SJiK$> C^-2^^f.l-i ~) X/^ ,4^<i57_fl 7^<D X..- ______- ^ 2:2,3 T.?. - r ]o 2- -A ------ ---------- 4tfHHET -------- /OQ)^-c ^ . - _ Qm^^ O -..- - —r11 '7r-tsT> ________-----------------------------------------------------------------' ----------------- •jt^usd ______________ _________________------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________-________________ ...............- - 1L>t> ______._...... _ Jf O___________ )0'^ - --------- —— i- * I f TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Adm. DATE:September 13, 1994 SUBJECT: #1960 Kuigdom Hall of Jetovah’s Witnesses, 3655 Togo Road - Variance/CUP Public Hearing Application: Request for hardcover variance to expand church parking lot. Zoning District LR- IC, Single Family Residential List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - List of Additional Persons to be Notified E - Survey F - Hardcover Calculations G • 1970 Site Plan H - 1970 CUP Documentation 1 - Pertinent Code Sections J - Building Permit #5822 and Documentation K - Section 10.56, Subd. 16(K) L - Area Topography , ^ , Pertinent Code Sections and Variances Requested L Section 10 22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L) - Hardcover limitation of 35% in 500-1,000’ zone (existing = 35%; proposed = 43%: variance = 8%). Section 10.20, Subd. 3(B) - Churches are a conditional use in residential zones, with no buildings to be located less than 50' from an abutting residential lot. J.Section 10.61, Subds 4. 5, 7. 8, 9, 10 - Parking perfonnance standards including: • 1 parking stall required per 4 seats based on capacity of main assembly hall. • Setbacks for parking lots: 10’ rear, 10’ side. 4. Section 10.56, Subd. 16(K) - Shoreland stormwater management requirements Zoning File #1960 September 13, 1994 Pace 2 Background Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses was granted a conditional use permit for church use in 1970 on this 1.3 acre property’. A church building and parking lot were subsequently constructed, although the current sur\ey shows that the site plan was only generally adhered to. At that time the parking lot was proposed to iiKlude 52 parking stalls to meet the "1/stall per 4 persons" requirement for a 200 person capacity building. The parking lot was constructed somewhat smaller than the original pJ.oi Church use has apparently expanded to a level where during specific times the parking overflows on;o Togo Road which is extremely narrow and not suited for parking. The current request is to expand the parking lot by approximately 36’xllO’. Absent a parking layout but using the standard 300 s.f. per stall formula, the additional parking area will accommodate an additional 13 vehicles. Hardcover Variance This property' is in the »«M,000 ’ hardcover setback zone and with the recent structural additions (discussed bel'“» ) the property had reached its hardcover limit of 35%. The proposed additional parking increases 500-1,(XX)’ hardcover to approximately 43%. It may be somewhat ironic that the church at one time owned the residential properly to the west but some time ago sold that property. Unfortunately, that might have allowed the expansion without a variance had that property been combined with the church parcel. Drainage Concerns The low area between Togo Road and Northern Avenue has been subject of some concern to neighborhood residents due to past drainage problems. The Public Works Department and City Engineer are cunently evaluating the drainage needs in this area. The church parking lot may contribute significantly to the volume of runoff in the area. If this parking lot expansion is approved, the church should be expected to contribute its fair share towards a solution. Such solution might include curbing the parking lot permieter to direct drainage, construction of stormwater detention ponding facilities, or perhaps financial panicipation in a neighborhood drainage improvement. Any approval for the parking lot should be conditioned on obtaining the church's involvement in such project. It would seem appropriate that any approval recomnjondation not be forwarded to Council until the City Engineer and Public Works Department have completed their review of this situation. Zoning File #1960 September 13. 1994 Page 3 Recent Additions The church applied for and was granted a building permit for a lO'xl I’ coat rtxim addition and a 14’.xl8 ’ carport in December 1993. Unfortunately, the inspections department did not call out the need for a conditional use permit, which normally would be required for such addition.^. This error only came to light during the current parking lot review'. Additionally, the church constructed tlw carport to extend 22 ’ cast from the building rather than the 14’ profK)sed, and that carport is now 47’ from the east property line where a 50’ setback would normally be required for any church structure existing as a conditional use permit in a residential zone. Since the constructed carpoii does not meet the parameters of what was approved, it would be reasonable to require the carport to be reconfigured to meet the 50’ setback. Technically, the City should also require the formality of the church filing a conditional use permit application for the expansions which have already been permitted. Issues to Consider 2. 3. Is there substantial hardship and justification for granting a hardcover variance to expand the parking lot .^ If iIk parking lot is allowed to expand, staff would recommend that a parking .stall layout schematic be provided and that the lot required to be striped. Since the parking lot expansion suggests expansion of a conditional use in a residential zone, it can be argued that the parking lot expansion is in fact an amendment to the original conditional use permit which was based on a specific site plan which is now changing. Please review the 1970 discussions by Planning Commission and Council regarding this conditional use, and note that at that time the practice was to approve conditional use permits without a resolution. If the parking lot is allowed to l»e expanded, proper drainage control facilities need to be developed. It may be appropriate that such facilities be designed to help alleviate existing neighborhood drainage problems. Regarding the additions constructed via a permit issued in error,: - Should the church be required to file an after-the-fact conditional use permit? Is there any reason why the City staff should not proceed to require the carport be reconstructed to meet the 50’ setback? Zoning File #1960 September 13, 1994 Page 4 6.Perhaps unrelated to either of these issues is that the 1970 conditional use permit discussions aiKl prcliminarji' approval by Council required a 15’ road easement be granted. The surv'cy iiKlicates a 10’ road easement. The Public Works Department would like an easement including 10’ of shoulder in addition to the paved road area. Staff has not researched whether any casement documents were ever executed for this road. Options for Actkni 1. Approve as proposed!. 2. Approve with conditions. 3.Table for further information ch Recommend denial for specific reasons 5. Other. I V a i ‘V J r iX'tiAin W'M VMU»r f'jizrrrL tJt I AI.U .‘r'li'l fU‘t » k V'V riJ.‘‘-k‘K \nl\11 » c'U } t V' * ^ * i * *'A i\VA I A !\C*vt.*/ lui?/ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AlLofiheTonowingjnfoniiation must be submitted bv the appiiration deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; Completed Appliouion Form 5. ^ Cenified Property Owners List of owners w ithin 150* (you must obtain this list from J Hennepin Co ’ini>- Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center. 348-3271). *^^rbt Map (ebtained with propert>' owners list). ^ .L^r^ertificate of Sur\*ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic surv ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 ‘/^" x 11" for reproduction 6. __Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy Sli" x 11"). 7- List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the nroperty'. This w'ould include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 8. \/^an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 9. __Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above Information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATLTIE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true^d corre^to the best of his/her knowledge. A? . Date -Applicant’s Signature OVVTSER’S SIGNATLTtE i, / The owner hereby acknow ledges and agrees to tliis application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes,of investigation and verification of tliis request. /, Vi/. , Owner's Signature_____^ ----• Date Applicant must have all submittals inio the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoni.tg Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 -3-n ?o *># V :: 7 [?n :3o)[29) 5n WN Mit V:^r.MttN OM «»*i»rs couMfT PWSPitTV iNrowuTioN snrrnoMNcts tiST SKiT MO. ri4|MOi ^•Cf IfMOP MMOMCK mmTUMPAVfltNMC/MM M l7-lir-tS 51 M2f 05*90 TOOT 00 ■AMOOlPM N NCRHAN naiM» nuzcK 1*90 TOOT OOM MUrZAT* m S5591.i U ir-UT-71 51 0029 05*00 TOOT 00 HNAIO J HESSfOiCM ■ONAIO J mss«OIC!l 5*00 TOOT toI** 555 n Si ir-iir-n n ceio05**0 TOOT 00 tOKOT * tMtll Jt OONOVJIN JAMOS IMSON 5**0 TOGO Ml MiYZAT* MN 555*1i TAMPAVtt: mm/imm M ir-117-n 51 005205*70 TOW OT mus TOST CO or €A NA KXMKUT mt scturfi 5*70 TOOT n MATZATA Ml 55591 TtSTf 50 17-117-25 51 001505*57 TOOT to M 0 MXU1AI1S I L « WILIAMS M 0 WUIAMS A L M HUIIAMS 5*57 TOOT n HAYZATA m 555*1 10 17-117-25 51 905* 05**5 TOOT to 0 * L CAttSON OALI 0 CAtlSON 5**5 TOOT to MIYZATA Ml 555*1POOP ADMTAXPAVIt » •, i- ■> k'p PMP AOM lOOCD NAMi . TAXPAVIt so 17-117-25 51 0055 05*75 TOOT to tALtW MIUIAM KCMPf lALPN KIHPf 5*75 TOOT to HAYZATA Ml fisfl SO 17-117-25 51 00*7 05**0 TOOT to PAICU S PITCtS PAMiLA S PtTftS 5*40 TOOT to HAYZATA m 55591 50 17-117-25 51 005*05*55 TOOT toiiOUNO CONG JfMOVAM WTN2SSCSNAVAttf CONS OF JIHOVAll HITfj C/0 KZNBOOH NAU 5*55 TOOT to HAYZATA MN 555*1 50 17-117-25 5* 0002 03700 NOttMttN AVC UO J SLICWA ITAL LCO J SLICNTA 5700 NOtTHCtN AVC HAYZATA Ml 553*1 38 17-117-25 51 001703*85 TOOT toGAMtETT S KltCHCNMlTZ IT AtGMtCTT S KItCMCMIXTZ 3*05 TOOT to HAYZATA Ml 55391 30 17-117-25 5* 0015 03*50 NOtTNCMI AVf THOMAS J OUMCVnC THOMAS J OUWCVIK 3*50 NOtTHCtN AVI HAYZATA Ml 553*1 , \t ^ TAXPAYft - 1 NMV/AOM < • PMP AOM (c;!fv OMCt NAME ’itv. TAXPAYIt NAIC/AOOt I.'- . . O' 50 17-117-25 54 0014 05*55 TOOT to NAtY I tXttKtCCt NAtY E SCHOMCt 5*55 TOOT tOAO HAYZATA Ml 553*1 38 17-117-25 54 0017 05*40 NOtTHCtN AVC AGNES • POLLOCK AONCS POLLOCK-PFCXFEt 5*40 NOtTWMI AVC HAYZATA MN 55391 .1' ,Vv , -..HiV./', l^'r 50 17-117-25 54 0015 00030 AOOtCSS UNASSlGNCO JCFFtCY tOKAT ZCLL JCFFtCY tOKtT ZCLL 5*00 NOtTHCtN AVC HAYZATA MN 55391 58 17-117-23 5* 0010 03*70 NOtTHCtN AVf t P JOHNSON AMR JOHNSON tOOCtT P A HYtA K JOHNSON 5*70 NORTHCmi AVC HAYZATA MN 553V1 Si 17-117-23 34 001* 03*00 NOtTHCtN AVE JIFFttV t ZEU JCFFtCY t ZCLL 3480 NOtTHCM AVE HAYZATA Ml 55591 » * TOTAL 8ATCH 00* 00017 P14S540119 c c . \ ■*; \ I * ■ ’ 1*. > ’ t. /■' -.ir' hardcover calcuu\tion worksheet Existing Hardcover in Zone 3A, House ^,7. LENGTH lO^ II // /V D i- - /§B. Garage ---,n- c. Driveway ^ i9_ _l2. / '. -O / “ Z, D. Sidewalk .J-_fl E. Patio/ Deck — X F.Landscape ^_ki AREAS UNDERLAIN ^ c, BY - PLASTIC SHEETING ^ X m 7 ‘-/S H < G. Other X w HASDCOVEi! IN ZCHE 3<^T ID •» ■7^~j )C ^ Total P roperty A rea in Zone S.F. S.F. / 2-1 S.F. 2.^2.S.F. 1^2-0 S.F. 3^ZM S.F.\ U 1 Z.OOOs.F. oo S.F. ■p* > S.F. f"’S S.F.a' * ■ y A S.F. ^ '• S.F.r 5&0 S.F. S.F. 277-S.F. HD S.F. Z ! I S. r . A ^0 rWS; 7- 4 s. FI B ^ I I g 4D. 'i^'7‘(c? X 100 Z5T D. 6» 0 v'iT. 7 19 f^PoS.e^ ■A• ’■ • • .... « , . . ... •• ; I t. . * . * •/’ - *. ,*• .r? .*\\ ‘ s* *. • * • -t • • , •A. • li . • • • «. * * T 1 |sis s m% • • ^2 c I -y • * - . •. r. . ’ ' A3 . ■vrr: - L ■*• ‘ ... ' - .r • .*•. .••it' *'* w 0 ^ K: ^ . -IQ ^ a mmm pita « imm \ <• .r,*..' j./ v*^ %;ls«eHi ; *. . V •.. -Vr ■.r; - .V'’ ^^.V r'.f. • •• •. r; Y* . •/ • / .* U >>*./ ^W.li . I. ‘t.»' •• , •,•••*; «•. •. •• t A V V-, v'Vrf-, 5i IJT::, V£;^a« '...j . ••■. ■►.v.-‘;-a r MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1970 Scarlcs moved, McCarthy seconded, that the request of the Jehovah V/itncsscs for a conditional use pernit at 367S To^o Road, be civen preliminary approval as presented, subject to allowing a 15* street casement along the front of the property. Motion, Aycs“(5) - Nays (0), Franzel moved, Searles seconded, to advertise for bids for a bookkeeping machine for the office, be approved. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Butterfield abstained. McCarthy moved, Searles seconded, that the appointment of the Village Administrator to negotiate with all Village employees, employee-groups and Unions for 1971 salaries, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) • Mays ( ). McCarthy moved, Searles seconded, to pay time and one-half rate to Street and Sewer Department employees for work over eight hours in any 24-hour period. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Searles moved, McCarthy seconded, that the request of Dr. Wyatt Moc, 1220 Lon.a Linda Avenue, for a property exchange with the Village, be referred to the Planning Commission. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Searles moved.McCarthy seconded, that Resolution #356, A Resolution Appointing Election Judges For The Primary Election To Be Held September 15, And T.ie State And Village Election To Be Hole. November 3, 1970, be adopted. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). McCarthy moved, Franzel seconded, t.hat Resolution #357, A Resolution Endorsing Amendment No. 1 On Tax-Exempt Proper y, be adopted. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays tuj. Butterfield abstained. McCarthy moved, Franzel seconded, that the Contractor's Estimate #1, ’ Dill Wear Excavating, be paid. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Preliminary Approval 3675 Togo Road ad'/ertisement for bids Bookkeeping Machine employee salaries overtime salaries Street Sower Departments property exchange 1220 Loma Linda Avenue Dr. Wyatt Moe resolution #356 RESOLUTION #357 CONTRACTOR’S ESTIMATE #1 Bill V/ear Excavating 1 X' f-i viLuci: OP o^ONO5SlJ!^20,*l95j"* punning Comalssion, rii-4following neabers present: Herb Johnson re^^resenteJ hinsclt in nn ' conJxtional iis»i permit to fill 6,000 square foet of low lan^l during construction on Lot s, Ulock 2 J^rtlcwood. Russell a letter from ir. Joanson’i attorney to tae Village Attorney followed by tac readin»» of the two ordinances pertaining to fillin«» low lands, niscussion was t!iea held on tae legality of .Ir. Johnson's application as to whether a buildinn pernit could be witltaeld if a person could build oa a lot ,, aspects of tae codes were met. • Ir. Johnson ex]»lained that the bigoest problem in construction was the construction- - - - - - - - - - - - -- V««W Of an adequate septic system and that ho was assured by a reliable contractor it could be done, hussell then explained reason for tiic ordinance covorin^ filling was tJ»c Village's concern for t ie la'.e, t.tat ponds and wetlands orcvcit rapid riui off of water and act’ as a filtering agent to water entering Lahe • linnetonka. McCarthy stated th.-^r so many applications for filling, similar to this arc being taken out, that sonj place a stand would .lave to be taken ari'^ lin'is '<rawn and hold so there t/oul-t not be .a wiiolcsalc filling of these Ian's, niscussion was then held on the nl.-,ttin<» of lyrtlcwood .and tnat future ulatting siiould de<licatu tlicsc lands ”o construction could take place on tuem. .Members concurred that there was no legal ground to deny the permit. Dongoskc moved, k'ullbcrg seconded, to rocoamond approval. Motion, Ayes (5) - Sabor represented the Jehovah (Witnesses in an application for a conditional use permit to oroct a church on HIla Cruppe ParE***^^??*^***^-*^"-**^* Langdon- -, S675 Togo Road, Along with Conditional use permit, a proposed division of the property was also reviewed. (continued) * 7:50 P.M roVDiTIONAl, I'SE PERMIT *5 'lyrtlcwood Road conditional i»3C pc iit a DIVISION 5675 Togo Road J r . ■’ V*'fair*-Et»W»r*»i»tii(rbirtrSM«^BS%^■ .,-v'•^^.^^•* ‘.?*******^t^w**^.»t«4i#4,>tJi#ii©l«t^-^*-': :^'‘ ■**-^:V*' - ': * v^' • i* -.V --■5-.-g?^?f* »•" ■•** itudioJ. Sloe* To*o «C-l!{fi*J»*!il[ • ?® »tre»t,. Russall witlnf-cf truifiT^d lU ,J&{^^^9VT9^ th9fd would bo* Parkinc was tho 'X:^IMXt«^tOSidkOCkod* Mr. Sabor asfti(r«<l ^ ♦, 4^ 4 A- *.. • ► • •.■ .. • •' -. \ t • • #i •-v • 'I ^ « % \4l ,>••.• • .„ll* * • , #• * ...,>o«t^t — i^ockod, Mr* Sabor assiirod bo wot -\ <I TV v-i«- ■.• -cj'i.ir-*''. I :. •.* 4-' r : t'* ;i:.v; rf'*. y % • Aimold Hogfo and Charles Hayes represented thooaoloet to discuss the division of Soc. 29. DI'aSION 3465 Sixth Avenue North 346S Sixth Avenue North, dividing 7-1/2 *‘*** “»y®» statingthat ho bad no obioctlon to the division and that bo would dodlcato the necessary 25* ?!*? otroot, Hewbers studied the poatibility of need for a thru street in tao future to Ifayxata Boulevard. It wns mown that tlio street, placed whore it is new would run into a swajipy area and t’lat tne distance to Wuyzata Boulevard was not so groat as to warrant a thru street. Dorn had reservations as to tUc overall ilanning as sone houses would be facing Jack yards. He also expressed the opinion that »oro stringent regulations bo placed on street construction, citing exanples ;'V . ■ •*P»Hcnce of other Villages. ’ /»®l*cusaion followed on public vs.< private of the accessory V- on the south side lot was discussed ""•*•• *****^ be Intended to build on the lot M soon as the division was / . ^owpleted, and that, in the event be could not, he would bo'o the garage to Hayes 7* •. >!*.• w %• .4t -- ** • .c ^ J r V. w f'•<#■ .-.—♦ • • ■ • • ' : ■?» .?vv*’«£.^f/ v>* T-V ♦t-»* •.....................' -^* > t'^: • ‘ ^'^^ • 1- T‘L •• . •I . V- .Jia* f, 1970 ■ V*'’'■•*■• •”■ ’''. ■ k ■* •' V V- ^ #■ fl I I Roi«r R*«d, Attomty iox SOT Mouad, Nina«sota SSSA4 0*«r Rof«r: Enclosed pUasa find dupllcata foras for ft eoadltlooftl ufto porait Toqulrod to plaeo • church in a rotlioatiftl •roft. . , , As far as tho division goos--a division vaa paid ^r and approved far a Mra» Doris Boschnaaa« adalnlatratria for tho Brie ZUl ostato. Sho triad to |tt four UU out of tho ostato and vaa approved frr tvo* Sho than novor brought in a plat for approval* 1 would suifost you aoroly bring in a drawing how von preposo to divido tho land, otaylng within tho iMlag liaita of ono»hslf aero and 100* front ago for *^****f^. lot. I will than aubait both tho plat and tho eonditipaal uao porait to tho Villago Council and Planning Coaniasioa fCr approval. If you aro in a hurry, this would hovo to bo in by Friday aoming. Juno 12, 1970, so it could bo on tho Planning Connission agenda for Juno 15, 197ft; othorwiao, it would iiavo to bo In by July 9, 1970 for next aonth'a Council agenda. Sincaroly yours, Mika Sehaller INSPECTION DEPAWPfBNT MS:as Enclosura r '• •*■'> .*** • *'■ .•’.7W '>/ ■'•' ' * . <- •• ••• -S'- % »rf? .'^M . >■<«*%• •V .»v« • 41 M. SeM M yhmtm C«Nwn» IteA TJT WM4» V^ !»' '* UMt Oip*^ PC WiMIOII» C<mIwwHoii •MriRf NM ;>! ^3 ^ Pleer She lp«h*t ''■' 9m 4pi» w • gum • . ^ Puiiii4H»w . * Nsi^ivt Ab#w * NO. OP PffIPtACB------ "®*“ ” * i.f .. SvkPlMHnf -V ♦' Jatili ^ < r- ■■■Hwp -.r V- ' She'- «'' Spen sniBOiMtt . Mmn , «»*V.4‘^., •» Vr tpirfm Mo SpMinf ' , ft^ V. Spell "• '. •fwinp * COUNO JOSTt / • '*"*V ' Spednf / lenpMt Ppen mn tiiT-T-" ~ Ne. *«• lai pw — Ne.l'‘’'_ ’ .>•• Stdtrwoy MMUTION — Ceiniif woiN • . ; ft ________ AOOMM__-___________________________________* SSlt%uL canlf. connection to a public later','sucS’^ ^dinlrl Hi'oh Wat.; T hurbors, are prohibited above the the Ordinatv w t excavations below the elevation or Delaltnent of «nt?t,®f o*'''* “ approval of the concurrent jurisdiction. = and other agencies with <yLl.€.'Ife sTiSndz The--oi:inr«uricrp°ar ciiii crnie^r “7tVre ““lnt' -1? be"Vse"d ”to discharge to public watlrs^" "ater run-off before / conducted in a manned tha? wlll^-^-'"*" PlanneB-TnTi areas, run-off verocjl:<es eriaLr"\'""l® ‘,''® disturbedrun-off volumes Disturbed potential, and reduce and delay as soon as pll'sible fa.?llt"““ atabilired and protected sediment on the site. ^ facilities or methods used to retain i-a • constructed stormwater outfiillc r« llud- l'nd%''x.r“ filtering or settling of suspendedsolido and skimn^ng of surface debris before discharge. ^ Hardcover Limitations. Krs wa 1 j 1 hardcover or impervious surface 1 High^wltfr <=°"sj:ructed within 75 feet of the OrdinalJ lifts landing LV'^ vif tributary, except for stairways; Municipal ^ode. lockboxes as regulated elsewhere in the ^5S"1eft"J felt°”aj;StiiG OHWLi tli0ir© sliQX X Idg no f-Hao v» j tr%‘a\Vr" t^h“a“n f irha"r"dtoil?.“ ^ th"e%"e^“sL\\^‘’l7- Public Uses.Standards for Commercial, Public, and Semi- Surface water-oriented corrjuercial uses and «">i nubUc uses with similar needs to have access to and § i0,20 \ SEC. 10.20. R-IA ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Purpose. The ”R>1A" One Family Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow a combination of low density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Planned residential developments may be allowed by conditional use permit. The district shall have immediate access to highways and public sanitary sewer. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "R-IA" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall he used except for one or more of the following uses: One family detached dwellings. Public owned parks and playgrounds. Municipal buildings. ^ Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "R-lA" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Schools, Public schools and parochial or private schools which teach a curriculum similar to a public school provided no building shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District and that a fence be erected fifteen feet or more from all street lot lines where the abutting use is for open play, and nursery schools providing fifty square feet^ of playground space per pupil. B. Churches. Churches including those related structures' located on the same site which are an integral part of the church proper, convents or homes for persons related to a religious function on the same site provided no building other than a residence shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot ir. an "R" District. C. Clubs, Camps, etc. Golf courses, country clubs, tennis clubs, public swimming pools serving more than one family, scout camps, YMCA camps, YWCA camps, church camps, or private non profit parks, playgrounds and other similar uses. The principal structure for any of the above listed uses shall be 100 feet or more from any abutting lot in an "R" District, and accessory structures shall be a minimum of fifty feet from any lot line. ORONO CC 279 (4-1-04) s 10.61 sum of four squar^k feet per front foot of building, one square foot per front fooX^of property not occupied by jy'^ilding. No individual sign surface shall exceed 100 square Source: Effect ivj icioal Code Date:* 9-14-67 "B-1" D. "B-l", "B-Z'Vand Height. Wiuhin the B-2" and "B-4" Districts/\na/sign shall extend in height more than two feet above the highes^Koutside wall or parapet of any principal building nor shall any/sigX,^be located closer than ten feet from any property line ejccept tha't^ any sign over ten square feet may project two feet ui"to any reqiadred yard area from the principal building. Source: Oroi^nance No. 172 Effective Datax 1-1-75 "B-3" and "I": Height. Within anv "B-3" or "I” shall extend in height more than^Xj-^*fe1 inDistrict, no height above building. property ^ne except that any sign exceeding ten square feet may project only two feet into the yard area from any building. highest outside wall or parapet of any'-p^ncipal sign shall be located closer than ten feet fbom any Y Subd. 4. Purpose of Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Regulation of off-street parking and loading spaces in this Chapter is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right-of-way and so to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum requirements for off-street parking, loading and unloading from motor vehicles in accordance with the utilization of various parcels of land and structures. All applications for an occupancy certificate in all districts shall be accompanied by a site plan drawn to scale and dimensioned indicating the location of off-s*treet parking and loading spaces in compliance with the following requirements: Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 A. Application of Parking Rules All Districts. In addition to the regulations and requirements set forth elsewhere in this Chapter, the following regulations and requirements regarding off-street parking shall apply to the required and non-required off-street parking facilities in all use districts: Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 B. Parking Requirements Waived for Building Under Construction on September 14, 1967. Structure or uses for which a building permit has been issued prior to September 14, 1967, but ORONO CC 382 (4-1-84) s 10.61for which work has not been completed shall be exempt from the hereinafter stated parking requirements if the structure is started within six months after September 16, 1967, and continues to completion. C. Existing Parking Not to be Reduced. Off-street parking spaces and loading spaces existing on September 14, 1967, shall not be reduced in number unless said number exceeds the requirements set forth herein for a similar new use. D. Floor Area. The term "floor area" for the purpose of calculating the number of off-street parking spaces shall be the net usable floor area of the various floors, devoted to retail sales, services, office spaces, processing and fabrication exclusive of hallways, utility space, storage areas other than warehousing. S. Seat. In stadiums, churches and other places of public assembly in which patrons or spectators occupy benches, pews or other similar seating facilities, each 22 inches of such seating facility shall be counted as one seat for the purpose of determining required parking. F. Size of Parking Spaces. Each parking space shall be not less than nine feet wide and twenty feet in length and each space shall be served adequately by access drives. For purposes of calculating parking space requirements, one parking space for one vehicle shall equal 300 square feet of storage and maneuvering area including access drives. G. Commercial Vehicle Parking. Off-street parking facilities accessory to residential use shall be utilized solely for the parking of passenger automobiles. No motor vehicle over 7,000 pounds gross capacity and no commercially licensed trailer shall be parked or stored in a residential district except when loading, unloading or rendering a service, except that one such vehicle may be parked at the residence of the owner or operator of said vehicle. Under no circumstances shall parking facilities accessory to residential structures be used for open area storage of commercial vehicles nor for open air parking for business purposes of automobiles belonging to the employees, owner, tenant or customers of business or manufacturing establishments other than the home occupation permitted for that property. H. Location of Parking. Required off-street parking in the*"R" Districts shall be on the same lot as the principal building. Subd. 5. Setbacks for Parking. Required off-street parking in all districts shall meet the following setback requirements: ORONO CC 383 (4-1-84) RH.1 riMi § 10.61Subd. 7. Control of Parking Facilities. When required accessory off-street parking facilities are provided elsewhere than on the lot on which the principal use served is located, written authority for using such property for off-street parking shall be filed with the City so as to maintain the required number of off- street parking spaces during the existence of said principal use. No such parking facilities at its closest point shall be located more than 100 feet from the premises nor more than 300 feet from the principal use or building served. Subd. 8. Storage Prohibited. Required off-street parking space in all districts shall not be utilised for open storage of goods or for the storage of vehicles which are inoperable, for lease, rent or sale. Subd. 9. Design and Maintenance of Parking Areas. A. Access. Parking areas shall be designed so as to provide an adequate means of access to a public alley or street. Said driveway access shall not exceed thirty feet in width at the public walk center line and shall be so located as to cause the least interference with traffic movement. All off-street parking spaces shall have access off driveways and not directly off of a public street. B. Fractional Spaces. When the determining of the number of required off-street parking spaces results in a fraction, each fraction of one-half or more shall constitute another space. C. Signs. Signs located in any parking area necessary for orderly operation of traffic movement shall be in addition to accessory signs otherwise permitted. D. Surfacing. All of the area intended to be utilised for parking space and driveways for four or more vehicles shall be surfaced with*'mater ial to control dust and drainage. E. Lighting. If lighting is provided it shall be accomplished in such a manner as to have no direct source of light visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent land. F. Curbing. All open off-street parking areas designed to have head—in parking along any lot line shall provide a tire bumper or curb of adequate height and properly located to ensure that no part of any car will project beyond the required setbacks. Subd. 10. Required Off-Street Parking. Where the principal use of the structure served is as listed, the minimum parking facilities (open or enclosed) shaJ.1 be as shown. A. Single Family Dwelling. Two per dwelling unit. B. Multiple Dwelling. Two per dwelling unit. ORONO CC 385 (4-1-84) 5 10.61C. Motel, Motor Hotel, Motor Court or Hotel. Four spaces plu-1 at least one parkin>^ space for each guest room provided in the design of the building. D. School, High School Through College. At least one parking space for each seven students based on design capacity plus one for each three classrooms. r Churches, Auditoriums, Undertaking Establishments, ^.t least one parking space for each four seats based on the desio- capacity of the main assembly hall. F. Theater, Athletic Field. At least one parking space for each six seats of design capacity. G. Community Center, Post Office, YMCA, YWCA, Physical Cultural Studio, Pool Halls, Libraries, Private Clubs, Lodges, Museums. Ten spaces plus one for each 300 square feet of floor area in excess of 2,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. H. Hospital. At least one parking space for each three hospital beds. I. Golf Courses, Country Clubs, Tennis Club, Public Swimming Pools. Twenty spaces plus one for each 300 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. J. Day Nurseries. Four plus one for each 500 square feet in excess of 1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 K. Office Buildings and Professional Offices, Banks, Savings Institutions. At least one parking space for each 200 square feet of floor area. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 L. Drive-In Establishments. At least one parking space for each fifteen square feet of floor area in the building. M. Bowling Alley. At least six parking spaces for each alley. N. Motor Service Stations. At least three off- street parking spaces plus two additional off-street parking spaces for each service stall. O. Retail Sales and Service Establishments, At least one off-street parking space for each 150 square feet of net floor area. - — — _ _ _ ORONO CC 386 (3-1-84) r CITr OP ORONO ree: $ , ^___________ BUILDIIIG PERMIT APPLICATION ived: 9 -fi'3 ' f3 tered BVi ’ Date Rece Date Appro%'ed:_ Pemitf: ^ - TN t-ORHATION must BS submitted IM full before plan Rir/I^r? WILL BS STARTED ** (See Check-off List Enclosed) __ i^APPLIC^OT IS: (circle one) CN^IER or CONTRACTOR r7l€»^b€yr 2) G /O iX n ^J. ^ ^ -J.P:^ SITE ADDRESS:VO /» OF OKI^ER:__ XING ADDRESS; (work) PHOJJE: (hcne) r* T5 . .TRACTOR:TT-fy;-j'-g XING ADDRESS: PV O tr! >f ^ <-0_ .T3 LICENSE: # _ _ _ _ _ _ P^ONS: ^ 7-^ - / C'O CZ^Y: J. — EITECT/ENGINEER: LING ADDRESS:_ _ E: ________ PHONE; V^~i» Jim ^ m -^TJ • ^ a.ir • RBGISTRA.TION # _ Af'cessor'/ Structure Move K^nc^a.e^ Land Oration, llSjb.POSED WORK (describe in detai.1):. t c~Cl----- H Oo<^ / ^cU±U—JU^1 RIES SQ. FEET OP EACH FLOOR: OP BEDROOMS garage STALLS: ATT DET. IMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land) - $, /' _and I acknowledge that the information jreby apply for a buildxng work will be in conformance with the ve is complete and accurate; * ' j* th the State Building Code; that I ICANT'S SIGimTURE: DATE r ^ jIL % A f A iA A J^TT OF ORONO 750 Kelley Parkway • P.O Box 815 Orono. Minnesota 55356-0815 (612) 473-7357 PERMIT TYPE: Permit Numtjcr; Date Issued 1 2/ I rE ADDRESS: 365S TOGO f'O CH P.1.N.: 17-117-23“31-003b SCRIPTION: OftOITION Building Perniit Type? E^u 11 d i ng Uo rI: T y pe UBC Occupancy Con?st rur lion Tyf ,-. Zoning INir-ADO/RZHOOEL ADDIT1DM A 2 1 VN LR-IC CITY QF Cr<OHQ FINA^^CE CFFICF ^ 1313100000 , Y 01 CEH 193.Q0 i-T» MARKS: SEPARATE PERMIT REOUIF:ED FOR FLEC1RICAL <STATE). A ki/^V A0A 00000 01 QEH 123.70 1222200000 01 CEfi 9.25 rucck’. E SUMMARY:r.■33St^ VALUATIOM 1$ 1, -SOO ixECElFT-Wm YOU Base Fee Plan Review Surcharge Total Fee $108.00 m2S00 cool ROl T0S:5i 12/16/9. f128.70 $335 .35 •NTRACTOR: - Applicant - lETZGER JEFFREY 147213bO •470 FAIRVIEU LA lOUNO MN 55554 bl2) 472-1350 OWNER:•JEHOVAH' S y ITNESSES 3555 TOGO RD ORONO MN 55331 TrTTTTT^ rrrr ^ - • * . ^ ^ ^ tSe’.'ONDErIIGNED HEREBY R PERMISSION TO'MAKE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS ; SPECIFIEO AND AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND STATE OF MINNESOTA E:D1LDIN6 CODE REQUIREMENTS. 1 /d. TO:Plannini: Commission Members Ron M(H)rse. City Administrator FROM:Michael F. Gatfron. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE September 15. 1^94 SUBJECT; #1961 Warren Paschke, 3349 Ciy stal Bay Road - Variance - Ihiblic Hearing Application: Request for variances for side setback, lakeshorc setback, average lakeshore setback, and hardcover in the 0-75' zone for replacement of a deck and railing aK>ve the existing garage Pertinent Code Sections and Requested Variances 1.Section 10.22. Subd. 1 and 2; Section 10.55, Subd. 8; Section 10.56. Subd. 16(C) and (L); Section 10.25. Subd. 6(B); No principal or accessory struemre shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots . . (exi.sting garage and deck to be replaced extend lakeward ot the neighboring adjacent residence structures by approximately 12’). Required structural setback for Uike Minnetonka is 75’ (existing garage and a deck to be replaced are located approximately 65’ from the shoreline). Side setback for structures in LR-IC Zone is 10’ (existing garage and deck to be replaced are 7.3 ’ from the side lot line). No hardcover is allowed in the 0-75’ lakeshore setback zone (no variance required - existing garage constitutes existing structural hardcover - there will no increase in hardcover as a result ot the deck replacement). List of E.xhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey H - Photos - 1948. 1973 F - Letter of Request G - Hardcover Calculations and Sketch Discussion •|he applicant ’s imeni is to remove and replace damaged deck nooring and railing which had deteriorated over ihe years. His contractor started work without a permit and the job was stopped by the building inspectors in its early stages. Currently, the inspector has allowed / 11 Zoning File ^1961 September 15, 1994 Pace 2 W* replll-menl te'lTol'prlwidcd'*’ 7.3- r™' rXs o?:;.c “f of approxiniaiely 10' into the average lakcshore setback n ■ h»v h more o an eiKroachment than has existed at this location tbr 45 vetrs Neither neighbor has commented negatively regarding this deck replacement. ' ' ‘ • Hardships ""'fda^ w^aS"'^ Tt!",,::. xf d"kfihe Ctty constructed prior to the avatlabtiity of treated lumber. Note that while this is an extremely small lot and hardcover percentages are in e,xcess offing "f u«aWh"\?;X pr^'r^'.“““ reducing the degre: Options for Action 1. Recommend approval as proposed per the applicant ’s noted hardships. 2. Recommend conditional approval (state conditions). 3. Recommend denial (state reasons). 4. Table for more information. 5. Other forLatact'iom* 26'h •’■genda I L i cm' OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPUCATION Initial Application Fee S200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal V’ariancc Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming strucrares $200.00 After-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 33^9 C^gAial "Road 9 m L 9 • * ».•?*'w»K. WJ » A u ^ ♦ 7d' . ‘ ‘T t »:‘t A .. ^ V V . r Tr iL ^v\..vA * V"! t I I rf^Vf i » WV iCCl ‘^01 714: ftono Propert>- Identification Number (P.I.D.) /7 ff? 2^ 4/ Q02^ ! nt fO k’all act. A<Jdiii Attach legal description to application if not included on required sur\ey. io ttinne.tonka BcacA Date Property' Acquired !?«ne /9 3^_________________________________(month/year) I (4)?l>'(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Pre.sent use of property; XX residential ____other (specify) Aea^onal on It/______ Zoning District: ShoKt-land 0vt.iila>j.________________________________________ APPLIC/VNT Name (i^a/ine.n L . ?aAchkt. IPhone (home) 937 55^3 Phone(work) 9?7 Address: /444/ VLlJng^. Dmivto City: f^rlpn r*/r<7/Zip: OM"NER (if different than applicant) Name Phoneihome) Phone (work) Address;Citv:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 2200.00________ Describe request in detail; /?e/«c?ye and n€.plac^ dama^e.d de.dk nniJing. ^omnw* pjL^vjqQ(i d(LHia g.e.d iLaaRinQ .uuid aco/aca tvith Q X-6 ee.el«tn </ee.4 hoix KKiA. (attach'additional sheets if necessary) 7<e.que.Ate.cl wotik La onL^ nt.paiA of t-xiAiin.^ rnate.Aial and doe.A not incKeaAe. REQUIRED Aq^uane. footage ox AeC^Ai ove.n. ^a/ta^e on Aandcive.n, Lot Area Lot Width ( ^Hardcover ___Lot Coverage XXX Setback; Other (specify) Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore '1 V* ir- HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PR(3PERTY CONDH IONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Be.ck and nailing ove.n ^anaae onig.inall^ built on !9^S~30, i‘Je.athe.n gau Apd nniling—ojud—f—boandLn^—6-t>---- —ne.t^uLAin^—n^pla c^m^nt—io fjnoride: naf e. de.cA and natltn.^,--------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) • ^ 1. Q- KK l'’» vv OD J14i /25. :liti zh i4e ■; REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be suhmitted hv the application de nHIino date in order for vour application to be considered rompl^jp; 1. '/"^Completed Application Form 2. _^Ccnified Propeny Owners List of owners within 150 ’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Depanment of Finance. A-603, Govt Center. 348-3271). 3. V Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed sui^eyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy S',':’* \ 11" for reproduction. 5. __Topographic survey (e.\isting and proposed elevations) if an> changes in e.xisting grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy Sl-i" x li" for reproduction. S. Sketches or plans of floor 4S: elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8',^" x II"). 7. ___List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the propeny. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). S. __As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ?. __Additional items as niav be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour 10najicejipplication is not complete if the above information ha.s not heen included. APPLICANT’S SIGN/' ^ JRE The applicant hereby ak,iees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and'or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowlediie. Applicant’s Signature/.^Date OWNER S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and^rification of this request. Owner’s Sicnatun Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings arc held on tlie third Monday of each montii. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advi.se tlie Building «Sc Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 WJN OATI 06/15/M BATCN 002PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 56 17-117-25 A1 0020 05555 CRYSTAL 6AV RO LARRY H NELSON LARRY H NELSON 5555 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA m 55551r .HEI#«P1N COtHTV RRORERTV IWORMATION SYSTEHproperty omcrs list38 17-117-25 41 002105355 CRYSTAL BAY RO PATRICK 0 O'ELANAGAN OONALO J STOVKE 3554 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA HN 55551 WPORT NO. PI455401PAGE A58 17-117-23 A1 0022053A5 CRYSTAL BAY RO JAMES N 06LANO JAI«S N OGLATR)5345 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA 55551PROP AOOR C»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 17-117-25 41 002505545 CRYSTAL BAY RO NARREN L PASCHKE MARREN L PASCHKE 14441 VILUGE HO(»S OR EOEN PRAIRIE MN 55547 58 17-117-23 41 002405555 CRYSTAL BAY RO JOHN E KUST JOHN KUST5355 CRYSTAL BAY ROAO NAYZATA MN 55351 38 17-117-23 41 002505555 CRYSTAL BAY RO B G A J L SECHRIsrB 6 GW*» A J L SECHRIST 5555 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA MN 55551PROP AOOR OMIER NAME J , .TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR\ .*V*: <4 :PROP AOOR . ; 0»#«R NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR. V 38 17-117-25 44 0014 05345 CRYSTAL BAY RO J R LOFRANO ETAL J R 10 FRANO 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA HN 5535158 17-117-23 44 0104 05240 NAVARRE LA CLAIR T A LYW 0 ROOD CLAIR A LYtM ROOO 2215 KENMOOO HAY NAYZATA m 55551 58 17-117-25 44 001703545 CRYSTAL BAY RO PAUL C HAGEN PAUL C HAGEN 5545 CRYSTAL BAY RO NAYZATA 1*4 55351Total batch 002 00010 58 17-117-23 44 004400038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C H PALMER A B J PALMER CHRIS A BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RO OROIO W 55351 J ■ l n • ! n DATE u 'ri *4 • • ;r- r . • »: » ‘ . t AcViticn To r«af'h ^ -inncton’^aP-ach, F.enn?,'in Countv, M1 n n' • 3 o t -1. Subject to an arparcnt easeaen "urpo-ses. \ *W f / /•<.i H$9$g \ rov9i. Lor /I/fer4 7> 0VMllAf6rOA/ I feTSI!liSr NO O DENOTES IRON FOUND • DENOTES IRON SET D irection of surfacf pi oiii .•“DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION U..I DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION LOWEST 7lOOR ""^''^T'ONS GARAGE FLOOR top^ of foundation |REVISIONSA4?pn^>r’TTJ77p4r^^l?JJ75^^ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED PY ME SUPERVISION ANDTHAT , AM A DULY REGISTERED fAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. -^;2L-o “TE_L«JV_ REG. NO. 19522 KIM A. REAUME REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 612-475-1314 612-475-1015 FAX 3305 GARLAND lANE N. PlYMOUW. /VUNNESQTA 55447 It f.MiPMl r>yf^-> .UJ / fV^, /i^.i#i^_. VH.JIS'^»» •/f 73 * « ., •■'' h 'i'* • 1^ I I ^2f .1 ♦1^ V •'^ , ;r' TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BRUCE B. DAYTON IN SECTION 35-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA .OH® -V-.- 1- " ------- -t -1^' . j • \, rr—T- COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. ENGINEERS. LAND SURVEYORS LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA \ ^ .•rr r tin, /like (ialteon Letant ’Planning <f ?onin^ ^(/minieinaioe City, of Onono 9,0,SoK 66 C^tfAtal Ba^,flinn, 553^3 Dean Pie, Qaffeon, The Oeono ?fanning CommiAeion haA AcheduleJ a heaein^ on a eequeeted vaeiance on my pAopenty at 33^9 CAyAtal Bay ^oad foe the meetiny on Sept, /9th,(99^, ^e have Auhmitted all neceAAaAy papeAA and paid the vaniance fee on thiA matteK and aKe hopeful of commiAAion appnoval on thiA mattee at the meetiny ,N otvevee, we would appeeciate yoti'i effontA to place thiA eequeAt on the City Council ayenda foe tneie Acheduled meetiny of Sept, 26th foK the followiny KeaAonAt 1, yJe have been unable to uAe the Aummee only lake cotiaye feont deck Aince AuyuAt 5th due to the "Atop wonh" onden placed on the~ pAopeety Atatiny the need foA a peemit, 2, The deck and anound level yaAaae aAe needed aA Aoon aA poAAible to peAmit Aemoval ana AtoKaye of the dock and boat which yo into the yaAaye. 3• The council act ion on the vaa Lance and AeAultiny peemit would noAmally occuaa on OctobeA /0th which would ceeate a haAdehip in foAciny cloAiny activitieA into mid Octobee, ide will appAeciate youA Acheduliny out vaniance heaAiny foA the SeptembeA 26th council meetiny, Thank you,^ li/aAAen L,PoAchke 33^9 CeyAtal Bay Poad lHay^ata,P)inn, 5539/ HtCEiVE!' SEP 7 1994 C\Tf OF ORONO 1 i .m i ( ri 1 •«<« 1 BOX OrEN D^. ✓' HOUSE ^47°' H(Tu>e I2'xl4' DECK CARAC'E BELOW \(-.^ Kcof- ^ yi a/^ci^ur / / V Q TREE 50’ WIDE LOT o TREE PASCIIKE COTTAGE CRYSTAL BAY LAKE MINNETONKA TREE CscAiE~r~y^o 17’ WIDE ROADWAY /"'/2' i 14’ WIDE BOUI.CVARD 4 HANK Hi)V^ h C^5Q^ C]i|P' ^s/ p' 172 ''VTf]L avtlc' *25 --------<;'3OT° llARDCmXR CALCULATION WORKSIIKET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* EXISTING iiARDCOVTR IN ZONE A. House _______ ' 2<-5QO’fOO-KKH)’ 22.^672 Lenfrti WiJdi X \ % B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk undt-K kou\9. and%/upfit deck 224/\ X X X 902 02. E Paiio/Deck. xeax dt.cking,xand walkwai^A ----—dt.c k * /2 -X—44------ F. Landscape Kock and p laAtic antJlA. Underlain______________* ----- Bv Plastic _____________ * ----- J.SS. 1080 7iis G. Other utility huildiriQ x 8,3 ^ !0.8_ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 36W mn-^ B \ lOO ssjua ^3- PROPOSED HARPCQVTR IN ZONft additional ha^dc^ve.^ A. House _________ - ^ —----------------- Length Width ) B. Garaac C. Driveway r* r - , D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _________B X 100 13 S.F. S F. S F. S F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. *; S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S F. S.F. S F. S F. S.F. S F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B A B TO: FROM: DATE: Chairman Schrocder and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gatfron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator September 15. 1994 SLBJECT: #1962 Ron Bowen - Prairie Restorations. Inc./Bruce B. Dayton, 900 Old Long Lake Road - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Application: Excavate a 7.5 acre porul w ithin a Type 7 wetland - excavation and placement of 51.600 cu. yds. of soil material. Ptrtineni Code Sections 1. 2. 3. 4. Section 10.03, Subds. 19, 20, 21 - Conditional use permit required for all grading projects in excess of 100 cu. yds. Section 10.55, Subd. 5(A) - The Flood Plain and Wetlands Conservation area includes those areas designated and shown as "stream, lake, marsh, wooded marsh, submerged marsh, inundation area . . ."on the USGS quadrangle topographic maps. Section 10.55. Subd. 8 - Development restriction; prohibition. No filling, grading, dredging, excavation, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures, etc. shall be allowed within the Fkxxl Plains and Wetlands Conservation area. Section 10.56, Subd. 16(J 5-a) - Condiiions/considerations for grading permits in any Type 2 through 8 wetland within Shoreiand Overlay District (the most northwesterly coriKr of proposed excavation is within 1,000 ’ of Long Lake). List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Letter of Request E - Overall Site Plan F - Pond Grading Plan G - Pond Site Plan n - South Disposal Area Detail 1 - West Disposal Area Detail J - Pond Outlet Area Detail K - Subwatershed L - National Wetlands Inventory Map M - USGS Excelsior Quad Map N - Outline of Procedures and Materials Zoning File #1962 September 15, 1994 Page 2 O - Spillway Sketch P - Excerpts from Engineering Calculations Q - Outlet Stricture Detail R - Soil B<iring Excerpts S - Letter from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District T - Letter from DNR U - Letter from City Engineer V - Septic Diagram, 825 Old Long Lake Road W - Excerpts, 1974 Orono Surface Water Management Plan About the Existing Wetland • This wetland was delineated in the City’s 1974 wetland inventory mapping. However, because it appears on the USGS map (Exhibit M) staff would argue that it is protected under Section 10.55, Subd. 5(A). • Mapped as "wooded marsh” on USGS topographic maps. • Mapped as "PFO 1C (Palustrine forested broadleafed deciduous seasonally flooded wetland) on the National Wetlands Inventory maps. • PI O 1C is typical of a Type 7 wooded swamp w'etland type. • Area of this wetland is approximately 10-12 acres. • Applicaiu’s soil borings indicate the wetland contains peat and muck ranging to a depth of 30'. • The wetland is in mid watershed of a series of connected wetlands lying generally north of the Luce Line, cast of Highway 12, west of RuAnn Road, and lies both north and south of Old Long Lake Road. A small portion of the Linda Wood area of Long Lake also drains into this wetland. • Orono’s 1974 Surface Water Management Plan inventories this subwatershed as "LLI2" with a total subwatershed area of 185 acres. The subwatershed contains approximately 94% of the required stormwater quantity storage. Of greater concern is the fact that the portion of watershed upstream from Day ton’s driveway (LL12A) contains only 77% of the pho.phorus assimilative capacity required based on the calculated pollution potential (more on this below). Zoning File #1962 September 15, 1994 Page 3 Proposed Wetland Alterations Please review the applicant ’s project description. Exhibit D. Applicant s intent is to excavate approximately 50.000 cu. yds. of material to a depth ranging from 1’ to 10 ’, average depth 4’. This w ill leave an open water area of approximately 7.5 acres, or 2/3 of the wetland. It is important to note what a unique area this is within Orono. and the strong commitment Mr. Dayton has to preserving this remaining ponion of Orono’s "big woods" environment. A walking trail system has developed throughout his acreage over the years, and bicyclers regularly take side trips through the trail system from the Luce Line. Mr. Dayton has stated his intent is that his acreage not to be developed but in one form or another ultimately be kept as open space for the public on a permar^nt basis. His goal with the current wetland project is to enhance the environment. Statt’s comments below regarding certain aspects of the project should be considered as encouraging the project to be accomplished in the environmentally friendly manner that Mr. Dayton proposes, rather than as attempting to create "road bIcKks". Mr. Dayton and Mr. Bowen were kind enough to provide the Planning Commission and staff an opportunity to visit the site on Monday, September 12th. Mr. Dayton’s intent is to create a more scenic open water area which will diversify if not enhance wildlife habitat in the area. At least one attendee expressed concern with the lack of islands for duck habitat. This is an item for discussion. Mr. Bowen notes that creating an island will constitute "fill" in the wetland and will require special review and permits by the Corps of Engineers, and may result in the need to mitigate by creating additional wetland where it does not now exist. If the Fish & Wildlife Serv ice has been consulted as pan of the Corps of Engineers review of this project, it might be appropriate if the applicant provide documentation from USFWS w ith their comments regarding the habitat aspects of the proposal. Spoils Disposal Spoils disposal is intended to take place at two sites within the boundaries of Mr. Dayton’s propeny. Specifically, 20,000 cu. yds. of fill ranging in depth up to 10 ’ will be deposited on the high ground in the area west of the pond over the existing riding ring. Total area to be filled is approximately 2 acres. This area generally drains westward and northward to the wetland located between applicant ’s tennis court and East Long l.,ake Road. This disposal area is approximately 150-500’ horizontally and 20 ’ higher than that wetland. The south disposal area is south of Old l^ng Road covering virtually the entire area of the plat of "Clubhouse Turn" which Mr. Dayton purchased. Spoils at this site will total approximately 33,OOObu. yds., again ranging in depth up to 12’ and in this case covering an area of 3.5 acres. This disposal area is of some concern for the following reasons; Zoning F*ile 01962 September 15, 1994 Page 4 A. The scwap treatment system serving the residence at 825 Old lA>ng Lake is located diTposa[ according to City records, in an area that is intended for spoils B. If this residence is intended to remain in use. alternate drainfield sites must be Identified and presersed before the City will accept this as a viable spoils disposal C. Applicant and property owner are advised with the proposed spoils dispt>sal. any area covered with even 1 * of fill will no longer be suitable for drainfield sites should there be a future intent to develop this property. D. The area south of the driveway for 825 Old Long Lake Road below the existing 964 contour mav in fact be a wetland if delineated under the WCA rules, and appears as wetland on the new City topographic maps. It is staffs opinion that this area must be investigated further before the City should consider it as a viable disposal site. E. /\n additional concern may be the reintnxluction of nutrients directly into the watershed (albeit upstream) if this is a wetland. This wetland appears on the NWI maps as a PEMCD (palustrine emergent seasonally flooded partially drained/ditched wetland). 50,000 cu. yds. of material is appro.ximately 5,000 10 yd. dump truck loads. To comprehend the magnitude of this project, consider at 20 loads per hour and 8 hour days, the project will move dirt for 31 working days. There has been discussion about a portion of the spoils being hauled off site. Such an occurrence would bring up the obvious traffic concerns, capacity and load limits of our existing City roads in the area, spillage, etc. It is likely that there will a significant number of trips just crossing Old Long Lake Road to get to the south disposal site. Also, the advisability of taking dump trucks on East Long Road headed north towards Spring Hill Road is questionable due to the narrowness of that road. Staff would recommend that any off site disposal be subject to specific controls as part of a developer’s agreement to be e.xecuted by the property owner. Water Quality In 1974 the City contracted with Eugene A. Hickock & Associates to complete a study known as Orono ’s Surface Water Management Plan, 'fhat study reviewed each of the watersheds and subwaiersheds in the City and identified stormwater quantity and quality requirements and capabilities for each watershed. This document is on occasion used by staff as a reference when review ing projects of a magnitude to have a significant impact on a watershed and ultimately impact on lake water quality. Zoning File #1962 September 15, 1994 Page 5 It is clear from the discussions on water quality aixl the wetland and marsh requirements that assimilative capacity of Orono’s existing wetlands is, overall, less than that required to assimilate all expected phosphorus loading. Staff gives guarded credeiKe to the numbers but accepts the concept that open water has less assimilative capacity than dryer tvpes of wetlands, as noted in the follow ing excerpt; “Permanent standing water has assimilative capacity of 4 lbs. per acre per year. Permanent standing water was defined as areas of the narsh having cattails and other emergent vegetation. The dryer areas of the marsh, which have water in them only interminently, absorb a greater amount of phosphorus and have an assimilative rate of 20 lbs. per acre per year". In Table 2 of that document uiKler Wetland Marsh requirements, the wetlands upstream of Dayton’s driveway are defined as Basin "LL12A". This subwatershed has a drainage area of 105 acres, permanent water of 20 acres and intermittent water of 10 acres for |i an assimilative capacity of 280 lbs. of phosphorus. The ps^lluiion potential of that portion of the subwatershed is 363 lbs. (under an urbanized development setting, which does not exist in this watershed) therefore 130% of the existing assimilative capacity would be necessary to prevent discharge of phosphorus to Long Lake. One can make the argument then that changing 7 1/2 acres of relatively “intermittent" water into "permanent" water may decrease the assimilative capacity' of that marsh system, and potentially more phosphorus would discharge to Long Lake if the watershed were to be intensely developed. A fair statement might be that in this watershed under the current density of development, the project w ill have a much lower impact than if the watershed was highly urbanized. Staff would appreciate comments from the MCWD as to how this project might fit in with their efforts to upgrade the water quality of Long Lake. Comments/Concems of Other Agencies • Minnesota DNR has submitted a letter indicating no objection to the project and requiring no permit. • The US Army Corps of Engineers has. according to Mr. Bowen, indicated they will not require a permit for this project. Staff has requested that a written confirmation from Corps of Engineers be submitted. • The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has preliminary' reviewed the application and tabled it requesting additional information. The Watershed District is expected to review this again on September 22nd. Zoning File #1%2 September 15, 1994 Pase 6 • City Engineer Shawn Gustafson has reviewed the project and requested: - Engineered plans or details for the dike structure. - Specific upland areas proposed for the material disposal. - Erosion control methods proposed for disposal areas. This information has been recently provided, however, Mr. Gustafson is on vacation and has not had a chance to review the further information. Suimnary of Issues for Discussion • Method of excavation proposed. • Has a contractor been chosen? • Water quality considerations related to assimilative capacity of the wetland system. • Potential filling of wetlaml at south disposal site. • Potential drainfield disruption and fumre drainfield elimination at south disposal site. • Off site spoils disposal method. • "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" must be adhered to. • Applicant/propeny owner will be required to execute a developer ’s agreement with the City, including appropriate security, and addressing dates and hours of operation, site protection, revegetation schedule, etc. • Applicant to submit documentation from Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service regarding their comments and permit requirements. • City Engineer to review additional data provided on 9/14/93 regarding outlet structure. • Any approval is subject to requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. We would appreciate their comments on the project. cm' OF ORONO - GENER.AL LAND USE APPLICi" i O'' i V' 'AVn IISF APPI irnHPiMV PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 900 Old Long Lake Road Type of Application to be Filed Wetland A1 teration (enhanceaent) Property Identification Number (T I P.) APPLICANT Phone q>ome) 533-4161 Name____Ron Bowen - Prairie Restorations, IncPhone (work) 1-389-4342 Address P.O. Box 327 Citv Princeton Zip 33371 OVNTV'ER (if different than applicant) Name Bruce B. Dayton Phone (home) 473-8314 Phone (work) 473-7979 Address 900 old Long Lake Road Cirv Wayzata Zip 5539^1 Date Property Acquired_____________1947_______________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - ______$ 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application ______$125.00 Residential Acces.sory Use ______$200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ______$175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ______ 5150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg • $250.00 Comrnercial/lndustrial Use ^ $200.00 I.and Alteration _____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain _____ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more _____ Gramiig. seawall, retaining walls witliin 75’ of lakeshore ______PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule ______$100.00 Renew r Pee tno change from original application) ______After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS ______$2(X).00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ______$250.(X) Vacation ______$175.00 Easement Vacation ______$ 75.00 Ea.sement Vacation With Subdivision ______$300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ______$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule (month/year) r-TTv r-rWA t r u* uMcivt.* . .. Of-~ICE i V V V'l'V' 01 6£v ECO. CtitCK TL 200. YOUff0l2490 cool m 71 OS/i PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District______ Present Use of Property Residential 6 Z__Other (specify)_jja^^u^aI_Area. A 6. 8. REQUIRED SirBMITTALS ^ • _f__ Completed Application Fonn. 2. Describe request in detail ’ ^ rs y4. (y Plat Map. finance. A-603. Government Center. 34S-327I). ^ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed survevor) - refer m hm i » rmlormation. to handout for survey 7 Toon? K* ‘^^‘^ription to application if not included on required survey property. This «'ouW ildudeLTOW^Ta"^^^^ i'o — Asrnald“7""- requirement FOR ^ROUUCTIOf on-0 rme^p-r^ applicanon is'LTtLX%^h^abo^?i'lTat^on^^l;“^ —------------------------------------ Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested hv ih* 7o • 3ES=S=~ Applicant’ssignature eo.Date ------------ OWTVER’S SIGNATURE JntnTm mT*’' '« P"* application and further auUiorized reasonable men'ibcrs fo^ n,™’’'"' consultants, ajents, conunission members, and Council members for purposes of invesiigation and verilicaiion of this request. Owner’s signature Applicant must have all submjiials into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meefi^ Pi Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants musTe present at^l'ch^ Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting of Utis Thtgr^^onol morns'" °'P« iIaIB LoI«j:« \ p l'«t KJH OlTf Oa/29/94 BATCH OOS> ' BROB ABM ' <M«R NAME . TAXPAYEH , NAME/AOOR• / • .. •BHOP AOm OMCR NAME TAXPAYER fUME/AOORt.BROB AOOR (MCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOORPROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR • •>'.* , BROB AOOR ^^1 0»€R NAME ■ \ taxpayer NAME/AOOR ' .rf-' n-.."• • ■iv :.t>‘ <,* ./ > > n A5 V V • ‘V, 5A S5-118-2J *2 0001 01005 OtO LONG tAKE R1 nancy temple SAMUELS K 0 LEVINE A 0 A RISTAO 450 HOOONILL RO NAYZATA m 55S91» 5«-lia-25 22 0005 00755 SPRING MILL RD f HINSTON A E C MINSTON EREOERICK HINSTON 745 SPRING HILL RO NAYZATA MN 555415# 34-110-25 51 0017 00575 NAKETiELO RO 0 K A A C MARNER DALE K A ANN C MARNER 575 MAKEEIELD RO NAYZATA MN 55541SO 54-110-25 52 0004 00705 OLD LONG LAKE RO A A N COPINATN ANANO A MARIAN GQPINATM 705 OLD LONG LAKE RO NAYZATA 55591 SO 54-110-25 52 0010 00550 RUANN RD P A K STUOCBAKER PAUL T i KAY K STVOEBAKER 350 RUANN RO NAYZATA MN 55391 ME^PCPIN COLtfTY PRCB»CRTY INTORMATION SYSTEMProperty onners list58 54-118-25 21 0002 00745 SPRING MILL RO DONALD C A NINA NILOMAN DONALD I NINA NILOMAN 745 SPRING MILL RO NAYZATA MN 5554158 54-118-25 25 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO BRUCE 8 OAVTON OKABENA C0MPA14Y 5140 NORNEST CENTER MPLS »l 5540258 54-118-25 52 0002 00250 RUANN RO ELEANOR HONE ELEANOR HONE 480 OLD LONG LAKE RD NAYZATA m 5554158 54-118-23 32 0007 00485 OLO LONG LAKE RD H F MARTIN ASP MARTIN HARRY F A SUSAN P MARTIN 485 OLO LONG LAKE RD NAYZATA m 55541 58 54-118-23 32 0011 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGhffO BRUCE B DAYTON OKABENA COMPANY S140 NORNES -^NTER MPLS MN #196 deport NO. PX455481 PAGE 1958 54-118-25 22 000200745 SPRING HILL RO FREDERICK HINSTON ITAL FREDERICK NINSTON 745 SPRING MILL RO NAYZATA m 5559158 54-118-21 24 0004 00058 ADDRESS IWASSIGNEO BRUCE B DAYTON OKABENA COMPANY 5140 NOnCST CENTER MPLS MN 5540258 54-118-25 52 0005 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO 8RUCE 8 DAYTON OKABENA COMPANY 5140 NORNEST CENTER r^LS (81 55402SB 54-118-25 52 0008 00580 RUAm RO J^S J SCHUMACHER JAMES J SCHUMACHER 440 OLO L0(4G LAKE RO NAYZATA MN 55591 Total batch OOS 00052 . \4 ^ . i • ■ • , A * p - - . ^4 f . "" Wti DATt OS/; MTtM 001i .> MOS ADOS QNNIK NAHC Y TAXPAYfS ‘5 NAME/AODS‘F PROP AOOR ' 0M4ER NAME TAXPAYER -S:, NAME/AOOR« r *4 •' • ‘ PROP AOOR ‘ jf 04MER NAME t TAXPAYER .-4 NAME/AOOR ‘ y PROP AOOR • OMNER NAME :i ■ TAXPAYER 'A NAME/AOOR /«-> >' ■■ ^ •/ ■■/ Vv* ' PROP AOOR ' . 'll CM«R NAME 'pi*- TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR ‘ 4 , 0 PROP AOOR ; 4- : OMER NAME taxpayer. /"S' NAME/AOOR I •. 4 ' ■ J, , ». , i • r nr ♦ f M \ i-*,-4 • ; '■•* '•M.i o.t 1« i , ■ -Sv «* «» • « ' /*t •;#• , - ■ # * .1 • 1*' • V i. •* ^ •. * « 'w '•f. • * • wy . • {;• 1 V V • ♦*'. :ir" Praine Restorations, (nc. P.O. Bos 327 • Princeton, Minnesota 55371 D To:Mike Ciaffron. City of Orono From:Ron Bowen. Prairie Restorations. Inc. Date:August 25, 1W4 Rc:Bruce Dayton Wetland Project Description Background: For nearly 50 years. Rruce Dayton has owned land lying just ca.st ot Long Lake. During that time he his gradually added to his original 24 acre parcel and now owns more than 150 contiguous acres. It is a beautiful, rolling landscape covered with stately hardwisods. many wetlands, abandoned pastures, and several acres of restored praine. It ts an ■ptional natural refuge in the midst of an olhei^visc rapidly developing suburban area.excel and it is there because of Bruce Da>loris farsighted resoureelulness. Although a long-range plan for this property has not become totally focused, it is certain that it will not be developed in any intense manner. Whatever the use. the natural plant communities and wetlands on this site will be protected and enhanced to provide maximum natural resource value and passive enjo>mcnt. It is with this in mind that this project is being proposed. Project Description: This project can best be described as wetland enhancement. 1 he basic objectives are to increase water holding capacity, native plant and animal life, public appreciation, and general esthetic qualities. Every ef fort will be made to construct the project using procedures and materials that are appropriate and totally sensitive to existing environmental conditions. 1 he processes used to alter tliis wetland will include dike construction, soil excavation, and plant con munitv restoration. No fillimi of the wetland is planned and nearly all of the work w ill oe done by working from within the /one of excavation. Adjacent plant communities will be protected and access to the site w ill be limited to one 30 to 40 foot wide corridor. r.. Bringing people together with the land i/i' *• < ---------------- Oflice 612 389 4342 • Nursery 612 389-5733 Tuo small dikes will be constnictcd. both of which will plug ditches that were dug before 1945. The snuller of these will be only 25 to 30 feet long and three feet high. It v^ill have a natural K>ulder overflow which wdl carry water into the lower wetland. ITie primary wetlarnl will outflow over a dike that will be built on the west side of the wetland and that will measure 80 to 100 feet long by four feet high. This dike will also be designed with a Kiulder spillway but will have a control structure built into it that can provide for the retention or dispersal of water as needed The proposed normal water level is 956 feet above sea level. The outflowing water will travel approximately 1000 feet west through another wetland and then on into Long Lake itself. Excavation of organic soils from this wetland basin is needed to create open water, increase water holding capacity, provide habitat for a w ider diversity of species, and enhance the esthetic character of the site. Appro.ximately 48.000 cubic yards of material w ill be removed from an area of about 7.5 acres. The maximum depth at normal water elevations will be ten feet, but the average will be close to four feet. Gradual underwater slopes and substantial shallow flats have been designed to help facilitate maximum wildlife. 1 he peaty soils being removed will be trucked to the owner's upland pasture sites within U mile or will be sold and taken off-site lor use as top.soil. Restoration efforts will include seeding of all disturlx'd soil areas as well as the excavated soil piles. Only native species will be used. Wetland grasses, sedges, rushes and wildflowers will be planted along the disturbed shoreline and in shallow water areas. In addition, an extensive 5000 square foot wildllower garden will be e.stablished on an adjacent wooded rise. Trails will be added, perhaps including a wetland boardwalk. Cunclusion: 1 his project has been conceived and designed primarily as an enhancement to tin already beautiful natural area. Becau.se the natural resource base is the main priority, every ellort will be made to protect the adjoining soils, waters and plants. Obviously there will be disruption during the construction process, but the end results should far outweigh any short-term problems. This project will be of considerable public value. Added storm water contaimnent and control may be the most obvious, but there will Ik many other gains as well. It will be a state-of-the-art restoration which could have significant educational value to other projects throughout the midwest and, notably, it will be done with private funds. In summary, this is an unusual project with great opportunities for both the general public and the private landowner to gain long term benefits. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BRUCE B. DAYTON IN SECTION 35-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA .OH® -V-.- 1- " ------- -t -1^' . j • \, rr—T- COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. ENGINEERS. LAND SURVEYORS LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA \ ^ .•rr \ \ \. I \ \: mw'.''lilii -s / /.I /•■ / / y//- f/M!h'r//Jiii ''A '/Wi ' / . // //. .7;//•/. 7 .1 !>// •'V ,» i: V /\. r / /6 N W'; I / • - r:. ••' / / A \/ \ \ I i I • /;• W\ r-.\ ! II •/? lif ''■vV \'VlVl'.l : i\. /''' m •\-\\ a ^v Mvv L ' t. ! * •! \ O'• V \\v N\.\> ’•S\vV> ;• \ % ■'•r '• 4/ •' * J * . i *I'\ v\'C j//jBrM^Jw/l\ y ft Am / . / <}0<'I \> •>V / / I. •■• .*» *•'•..••1 •Um- '• y * \r ■/'® •' t'1 '.V 7' i./4' / ( / / ■J/ •• ;$ I:v. f ». \s- i- ► V. . • *1 y* N.* ' \ ■,V’'4-.,i,t‘;«v ,v-w:>i: r ^ \W \ v V n , \\H\ !.' N AV-'^V •.• if* \\V \\\\'’‘ A' /// i\U •*.; -VV:fVr.Ar^' V.i* . ‘i'^1 / *’V- / '•v: V\4 a I Af; I / I'""f/j/ ) 4Ms;•^y <r/): ‘I,-: / 'V‘/•'.v-N / / /// Q r /, X.^ 5 - CV \ ( \ ftV ' I A ''i •l\. X $* X \ '\\ / \ i / / f \ V \ \ / ✓ ^ //" '! / // / / ft \ /Hill II I'I I I / I' ' f C 'V \V / N « ■y \ :» •. • A * ■ • f \ \\ ' : >< • • I. I. / / 'o'^' f- ■<r •’iSTw DIS>09Ab-ARI % ^ \ N.\ V \ \\, V* S5i • * ••■ \--. xx's\ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ ^ \' X 4 \ \ I 0/• / 4 / / . ■ ' / ■■’ ■' ■/^//•'/ :/ / // I / / // / j'ninv./ / I \ \ . \ / •:* 4 / y / / / / V \ V \v \ \ \ ////'/* / / ''// li'/ ///!//1I ih !I In ! 11 / . / / ^ /''/////'' / /// ! ! / / /■ ' -I• #c^EMc;P55riCd1! t ‘ V - >FEW3gijBrc ■t^ •PUfeP*=-ff£i P£MC.Mfi pu6<yon0LfUBH♦V tfc'<-•# ■ «• i y J' P^c-i tfO\CP<v j> y N>^M /%"~i>^oV H o «''RjaE.Cr'% *fFOl'il'•QIC i..• ••O—P35IC« * ip •\ • % ^ . ‘ • S>Old PEl^Cd. 1^V:)c;^'‘ PU6F ^ae ••••»«%■ ( •• •««•••■«» -•- •••••m I L-uur^ti , ^ Vt?£^p7»rttA ^ roi^^r^ ,» PU6G _ .du —r—*' \ / L©ivt?o>'f;>t^e<ouoM.s C. ^f■^^r^JO^JAt,C‘^ 'T-eC'Det> nO ivX »V. tMB, - .>PtMf^ \ V • ______ _ <PJLJ6F. ^e,Pi',v.3v -v^ V' 1 tJ • 1 V V PU6tK/ *. fFQU / ' O . 0—P^5IC ^ • PU6F PJLJ6F- \ o ^ /V/>- »w:;!^issaiuftneKviuasn''' 1 c ■4L*7!>»/j%',»_ J \X '>A"^<*A "irr^N >^\h0 \.73^z y^ ^W W te \r. ^ *;^' ^r-' ^ ir^r: - / j ’'v/ ' \T ^25I jgiI >'ll-VI> r ; rvt 5t>A '< /">1 ti^-' •o *2f- I ^ T" >tr^‘ ^ • V*’ • -'•^i ,/^ ?A i i' ^ •- * jiA"; * * •‘^-m^ ' V 'i yyf-i- ^ V <-K rOU \' r • ,\a ^ •T M y ■VC|fO ]MvA 'A V ei -5;>“v «>W JCtc-i rs4^sT'LOU^s • • L'■ . 4 - 7:. \ 956 ■'v - ^A,i ,.! -bi \\ A ' .rtS 1-^' W .A ^3 ffiHL \ Wayzati Country ./‘i 4ra^ i '** - -' )_ i ***C»ount! 1 «.. 4 S't' ( JA JLTOnO- CiuUj) -. "'Q >>, ^ A ^y4' '>■ ■<:r?- f ' ' ■tAAj' . //. «, ■f\rv-'uife A cr>^ A V.''^y- rSS^<7 - ei >r> X->■ :-^- X -^i • j'^^ — •<35 y/?»mi rj" D *-A>' t'wm # AV; c. 3 ■C^ . O' tan • • August 31. 1994 An outline of the proeejures and materials to be used for alterino and restoring approjiroately 7.5 aeres of wetland on the Uriiee Dayton property in Orono The following outline defines work which will be done to create open water in this existing wetland. Nearly all ot ttw work will be done from within the excasation zone, tlierebv limiting disruptmn to the surrounding natural area. Detailed constriictam drawings of the dikJ .structure are yet to be developed, but will be pro\ ided to accompany working specillcations. 1 he project will include the following: A. sSile Preparation: 1. During October or November ot 1994, a contrt>lled burn using appropriate procedures, equipment and peniiits will be implemented. 2. IZro.sion silt tencing will be placed around all areas designated for excavation, deposition or construction traffic. • X U.Cutisf ruction: Wayzat^ Country During the w inter of 1994-95. excavation and transport of the organic soils w ill be done. I he specific equipment and processes to be used remains undefined at this lime. During May or June of 1995. the primary dike will be built. Driveway reconstruction may also occur during this time. Again, working drawings and specifications remain undefined. C. Restoration: Seeding will be done during the spring ot 1995. All disturl'ied areas above water will be seeded with seed collected from the adjoining natural areas at a rate of one pound per lUOO square feet. Individual seedling plants will be added to the seeded areas at a rate of 1 per 10 square feet. The species used will be chosen from the Ibllowing list of possibilities. i y- / Wurr plamaifi {Alisma Plca^a^o-^juatica) Cdit3d3 annTTOTC ccifhjJensis) Columbine {Aqutle^kj canadensLi) Swamp milkweed { isciepias mcamula) Blue-wood aster (Asier cord^f/itLs) Pamtded aster (As^ Umceolaius) New England aster (Aster no\ae-tm^lkje) Rcd-stalkcd aster (Aster pwuceus} Flat-topped aster {Aster msmbeilatus) Tuniehead (Cheiime glabra) Willow-herb (Epdobmm coittrcuum} Joc-pye weed {Eupatonmm maeulatnm) Bontsci (Eupatoriurff perfoluilum) Grass-leaved goldenrod (EiahLmtus gramtm/oita) Northern bedstraw (Gaiium horeaie) Bottle gentian (Gentiana onJreHsu) Sneezeweed (Helemum autumnuJe) Giant sunflower (Heliar^hus gtganteus) Jerusalem ^ichokc {Heltamhus tuberosus) Common ox-eye (Heliopsis heitamhotJes) Siliall Si. John’s wort (Hypercum majus) Swceiflag (Acorus caiamus) Fringed brome {Bromus ctUatus) Blue joint grass {Lalamayrostis canadensis) Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvam a) Tall manna grass {Ghx ena grandis) Swamp satin grass (Muhlcnbergia glomeruta) Reed grass (PhragmUes ausiraits) \MldJl0wers Grasses Gre^ St. John's woil t WiW iris (tris xerstcoior) Tall star (E/afrij^'vvnoj/ui'Mu) Turk’s cap Idy (LUium tmehtgemense) Gre^ blue lobelia (Li>belia siphihibca) Frmged loosestrife (LxsimcKhm ednua) Monkey flower (Mummlus rmgens) Woodland phlox (PMox Jnaricata) Mininram mint {Pycnar^hemmm xtrgimunum) Swamp buttercup {Rammettius htsptetts) Green-headed coneflower (Rudbeciia iaedtiuia) Arrow-head (Sagiitana Lu^a^ia) Swamp saxifrage (5Utxifragapansyl\'cmu:a) Golden ragwort (.Senrok; iiunrai) Cup plant (Silphtum perfoliarum) T all meadow rue (Thaiu trum djsya^pum) Early meadow rue (Tha/tctrwm dtotewm) Culver's root (I ertmKastrum virgimcum) Green bulrush {Sarpus afrovrrens) Great hulnish {Scirpus vahdus) Giant bur-reed (Spargamum eunvi^pum) Ctxd grass (Spartnut pectmata) Cattail (ri/7/Tti latifolia) 3.All dc{x>sition areas will be broadcast with oats at a rate of 2 pounds per 1000 square leet when the soil is thawed and workable during the spring of 1995. They will be allowed to dry during the summer and will then be blended into the existing lajidform and seeded w ith a permanent cover of grasses tmd wildflow ers. ' X > : • • •• «k m',? • V. » Icname; djrvtnv%ct sit ^ '• \‘'-‘ i.'- :• ••,.:• ' • - .]'.-• T *'.**• ’ •'}Ci . ...{.^-.r;_.:d’*..-..:..•,• ••• •*:•. : '..V>V:iV-^yr/;r - ■•■.>^.-*■'. • ;* %■ Or ^-4* •--• • •. I . -* • - • .«.• r*-— . •..- • . <»?\j(^ l>^Pe* -fi-. .--ill v'^i'♦.• -r-, t-ji.-• * •MiGsr "TO^ -+t _ ?7 7/77 7-7 51 Flrw lcuE.(- ______i ec'i<in^^ f 0juJ*^ / l^ve\ / / / / r ii.5:W/ ^ fctS" / .«- ?'7.<..;^7;.j^;:7‘;' • / * . «».S- -(%*!-,•» I** ,««».* OW&C-^Obk* A-Ae^ • : f T .* • «• «, i- _U-'»v I • ♦1 ‘tf •‘1-4 •, ?:•■ i ; i •/» - •• •. . • ,».1 • - • ,"* ,** .*•;’' * * * '* ‘ • I.*#.*- 'J; 8?%:: i W?: i h;M'rr • #1 $frr... -.I'iliilJS-, ■ ,'U;iSi iulii m •<-N h!f s.- 4 • ^ ^ ^ 'J'f'-'’ { ZJ* ,r\' / ^ A^t'A (fj.fr,)/A^CAf/ fA. V t 4 . SfVyFCO C"./ ^^2 '<• 2: jc ? J<7t? 7a,y >ff CTA M. £^,V . 5 - ^ r j /, Jcjc? /y 1^6, OOiJ. 500 0 • /^ 3i7, lOj 0* •• ^ 20 O 5' o, 7 Ccf. i'f’ .*1 fpcigf).;. xr f CAi/AT/gAy {S7^411 A'c'A^' Tc AJf) F7ei7 7fa.Ar.)//^CA r/v .-> / i/j 9SOO c.^. /Z, Xoo •'/ 37 00 ZS^7c?o /?rc/:/At. (AA'c C. A\ ?30,0 2 2, ooo 70 0 " ^52 c/y. ).< I • ••: »..; • T-ii •.>■•!‘Miji 'V • .• r-f *»»• ‘ » • #« * ^ . ‘ '. ii/if* •• t " * r-:.TC(t'"*r ‘V,VpjV 'i T otal fycAoAT/AAA —S' tolfin & Gronberg. Inc. 482 Tamarack Ave Long Lake. MN 55356 :ir Liff:,.: <;i h ^hf. ' ♦ »:■> wv ✓/;•> V. > t A/(fdT J -yl - <?v il (< •; hm !!.-b^-] ;!v^: t-» t. .i** ' ,f‘: ■;-i|f cof,r j^- S?,spo ^ i. i•i'!>r > i ■■ ^* 4^/~ A ij^Afe T^,. ^1- . .. ♦ ’V/^_• f., :’ uIk • ; ‘ Jt<S r ■■L'5!.T':-^e' .* > ’•;i|i!jr ^/di ^ Ss<^^ Soo (U V^TyfAirA./^; i/J/ /-^ OOO V ^ COO C. ■f’, > ^c?£? /•5*<, <7<3<3 ///^ 0^00 <P-^y rv'/, Huntingdon Cifir fetlxif CorpoT9tieg f>W Cnxn«^ Si Pjgi lAnnwpu SMM «ir»C45 JCOI *« («»2) 659;3« March 22, 1994 Mr. Ron Bowen I’rairic Restorations, Inc P. O. Box 327 Princeton, MN 55371 Subj: Subsurface Exploration Program Pro|x>sed Pond St. Paul, Minnesota HIH #4122 94-1110 This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration program performed for the projx)s<^ m^-made pond project in Orono, Minnesota. This work was authorized by you on March I, 1993. Our .scope of sci vices you rapicsted consisted of i>erforming seven (7) standard jieneuation borings ranging from 12’ to 35’ below the ground suiface. Ihe subsurface exploration program was ^*erformed in general accordance with the applicable American Sinndard for TesUng and Materials (ASTM) procedures, as described in the altachmenl. The test loottons were slaked and selected by you. We have atuched a sketch of the general oca ions. Tlie surface elevations were Liken from the contour elevations shown on the plan you provided to us. Generally, the surface elevations ranged 956’ to 960’. glaci^t ’ll^ stiggesl a soil profile consists of swamp dc|>osils underlain by sandy lean clay Water level measurements were also taken in the open boreholes during and at the completion ot die drilling process. As indicated on the attached boring logs, groundwater water was measured to be within 1’ of the surface at the lime and location of the borings. If you have any questions regarding this letter, or if wo may be of further assistance, please call me at (612) 659-7405. ' Very t^uly yours. Steven J. Olson, P.E. Senior Gcolechniciil Engineer QfOur O# cnn»|i4nwv5 An Allifmaiive Acl»on Employer / / Q' A //2 EXISTING WETLAND NORTH ^4. 0' 100* 200* % SOIL BORING LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED POND LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA HIM #4122 94-1110 NOTES: ^ APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING LOCATIONS WETLAND PERIMETER Himtincdon ) MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka. Minnesota 55345*1597 onic«: (S12) 93S-S320 fax: (C12) 9M-A244 OBTBKT AOlIMfSTRATOW EiltnB Son#* •OARO Of MAFiAGCRS; TNynas Map»f > . ^ • C WonOrjn \jyw9 • Jo^'^ E rtonas t/xJif y • Tboros W LaSou'iJv • Mafifia S • fiffifia G fti<! LA«1 aMHCtOMU August 29, 1994 Psr»it Aoolicstioo No. 94~145t Applicsnt: Location: Purposes Dear Hr. Dayton: Bruce Dayton 900 Old Long Lake Road waysata, NN 55391 City of Orono, Tilt, R23, Section 35/36, NZ/NW 1/4 Wetland alteration inTolving excaration to create open water pond. At the regularly achedu’ed August 25, 1994 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit applicat or. was reviewed along with the follcwing exhibits: 1. 2. 3. Permit Application 94-145 received August 1, 1994. Site location map received August 1, 1994. Typical cross section received August 1, 1994. Action was taken to table your permit application pending receipt and staff approval of the following exhibits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. S. Signed plans by a professional engineer registered in the state of Minnesota. Cross-section ol earthen dam with control structure. Documentation of approval from the City of Orono. Erosion control and site restoration plan. Construction plans for suggested recreational trail development. fnaly'.;.8 of flow through system. A detailed wetland restoration plan. Docu.T.entatior. that spoil .'r.aterial will be re.T.oved from site or placed within upland area. These items should be received no later than September 12, 1994 for your permit application to be on the agenda for the next meeting of the Board of Managers scheduled for September 22, 1994. Sincere'y. Eller B. Sones District Administrator AUG 3 0 1994 EBS/cr Ron Bowen, Prairie Restration Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono '■'^1a.- .w 4 r M STATE OF ^^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE NO metro waters - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 PHONtNu 772-7910 FILE NO July 22, 1994 Mr. Bruce Dayton Bliss & Co. 990 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 RE: PROPOSED WETLAND ALTERATION, CITY OF OPOMO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Dayton: I'd like to thank you and Ron Bowen for meeting with the City of Orono staff and me on July 21, 1994 and laying out the proposed project on your p-operty to the east of Long Lake (NW 1/4 S. 36 and NE 1/4 S. 35, '1118N - R2 3W) . The wetland in question, which is located east of Long Lake (27— 160P) and west of DNR wetland /27-829W (Buffalo Head Pond) , is not a wetland under DNR permit jurisdiction. Therefore, no DNR permit would he required for the proposed excavation of approximately 330,000 cubic yards (approximately 7 1/2 acres). Depending on the method of excavation utilized, a DNR appropriation permit may be required (if dewatering more than 10,000 gallons/day or 1 million gallons/ycar is necessary). As we discussed, you should consult with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (Ellen Sones 9 939-8320) regarding permit requirements and ensuring that the project meets the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. Please contact me at 772—7910 should you have questions. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist c;Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono Ellen Sones, Minnehaha Creek WSD Joe Yanta, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Long Lake file (27-160P) AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects September 8, 1994 OfTO G Bcr^.roo •€ aoor^ yt eosenr ?£ • C Arxjpnm L Sqtwm G-e^ 5 Cjc * ®E € SoMTv RC««en G Suwn M ££^4^ C ? A Cor>^^,*Jre A Gcwoon Pf »jort f PE Knjitl Wl »c«e» Pf r)«Md C Pf ilsacje'? C iu\set ♦ ' ^ ^ aoutoor P£ Mjrt • Hjrvjn PE T ft»urr>*nn •£ >0 » Femj PE *^*\xnws • ^ ^ OorvM! C Sk^QM. PE TAOfnM A Sy^ Pf J SwrOcnj PE v^-»e PE p tjw PE V)nes M t<Vj A iC P a Pf C L/nc-» PE Jjrnet « Pf Jer^ P AWV A pf » J Pf Kt^'ye^ p A'XJP'VTH Pf •ktjrll 8 8cf\ Pf Ujrt A SrO Pf GjrV W ^tonpr' Pf Pjm J Grfr*ror> A * 04n«« J EjgrTDTL Pf A t«fe khmd. PC PhAC J ClWliPA Pf Mjr^ O V4M. Pf ViM i Pf i. P^Hi<» Pf L Jl tp^nen Pf Gjf> O A «c#t2 PI » ^ood frovp* Pf f r»oo Pf ^>tx^^ . Hpnr< pf o owiuNx^ PE Cpc«o 0%«* Pf PJUI G MPUP* Pf XPn P Gcajp * Pf ^ E % Lfo V PMrsA/ HMn M Oiors jjmn f E^x^rPt^AS Mr. Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crvstal Bav, Minnesota 55323 Re: Davton Wetland Enhancement File No. 139-1962 Dear Mike, We have reviewed the proposal to create an open water wildlife pond within an existing Type 2 wetland. As the wetland is not a DNR wetland, the jurisdiction for wetland alterations is with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Local Government Unit (LGU) for Orono at the State level. At the Federal level, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) also has jurisdiction for excavation within wetland areas. The LGU has reviewed the proposal and requested additional information. To our knowledge, the COE has not reviewed the proposal. Fhe proposed wildlife pond/wetland enhancement is acceptable from an engineering standpoint and we would recommend approval contingent on approval from both the LGU and the COE. However, we request the following information be provided prior to construction: -Engineered plans or details for the dike structure -Specific upland areas proposed for the material disposal -Erosion control methods proposed for disposal areas We want to make sure that the disposal operations do not impact the drainage on the property or adjacent wetland areas. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very ’ truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIA'I*ES. INC. 0 Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 I r 1 i « J 1 1 w 1 1 ■J .1 i The Point Runoff Hydrographs were multiplied by the specific acreages and combined to generate a single point hydrograph for the sub-watershed area. The slope, distance, and flowing comfigura tion were considered in calculating the time of concentration to collect the runoff at a common point to form the Runoff Hydrograph. An equation for the storage area for each sub watershed was developed to relate the storage avaialble at elevations above normal water level. The outflow equations were derived for the dis charge from the storage area to relate outflow rate to elevation above normal. The runoff was then put into the storage area and the rise in water level and outflow were calculated for each time increment. This produced the Outflow Hydro graph which was then routed through the channel to the next sub-watershed storage area with the timing and flow dependent on the slope and con figuration of the channel. A summary of the information generated is given in Table 1, Simulated Storm Water Runoff Hydrologic Data. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ B. Water Quality Considerations The following method was used to analyze storm water runoff quality utilizing natural means for filtering and improving the quality of the water. One means for evaluating water quality is the quantity of algae in the lake. The exact quantity of algae present in a lake is a complex function of many environ mental parameters, but the size of the population is closely related to the rate at which nutrients are supplied. Nutrients are supplied at varying rates, and the single nutrient supplied at the slowest rate relative to need exerts a controlling effect on algae growth. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency study titled "A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake ilinnetonka determined that phosphorus was the limiting nutrient in Lake Minnetonka. Pollution loads to the marshes and ponds were determined based on phosphorus as the limiting nutrient. These loads took into consideration tributary acreage and potential development on the Maximum phosphorus loading comes f’ residential.development and is 3.46 Ibs/acre/year. VI-4 The assimilative capacity of the marshes vv-as determined using two rates. Permanent standing water has an assimilative capacity of 4 Ibs/acre/year. Permanent standing water was defined as areas of the marshes having cattails and other emergent vegetation. The dryer areas of the marsh, ;vhich have water in then only intermittently, absorb a greater amount of phos phorus and have an assimilative rate of 20/lbs/acre/year. C. Wetland and Marsh Requirements Table 2 presents the basic descriptive data for the marshes and wetlands within the study area. Informa tion regarding; marsh acreage, tributary acreage, soil types, etc. was essential for the estimation of acreage requirements for storage of storm water runoff and maintenance and enhancement of the water quality of the lakes within the study boundaries. After all the important marshes within the study area were identified (Figure 3), this information \^as com piled in tabular form. Table 2 presents the resulting information in an 11 column format as follows: 1. Names of watersheds and code names for sub-water- sheas (the sub-watersheds are shown on Figure 2 and the marshes are on Figure 3). 2. Acreage drained to the individual marshes, with totals for the drainage areas t^rhere necessary. 3. The acreage of permanent water in the specified marshes and totals when necessary. 4. The acreage of intermittently flooded wetland and totals iifhen necessary. 5. The pollution assimilative capacity for each specific marsh with totals when necessary. 6. The maximum residential density pollution potential for each specific drainage area with totals when necessary. 7. The percentage of the marsh needed to assimilate the projected pollution in its drainage area, 8. The acreage, if any, with the potential for develop ment of duck ponds,within a marsh (located in permanent standing water and computed from the water quality data). - 9. The acre feet of storage available within the marsh. i j j <•» « 1 1 j j 1 j 10. The acre feet of storage required to prevent the flood level fron rising nore than h foot. 11. The percentage of each narsh needed to control flooding fron a 24-hour, 100-year storn. Storn water runoff storage for each narsh was conputed by assuning that the water in the narsh could rise one-half foot during a storn. This rise would cover both the pernanent and internittent narshlands. The potential storage was then converted into a percentage of the marsh needed based on the relationships of drainage area, sub-watershed area, and sub-watershed storage required. Therefore, the percentage of the narsh required for storage indicates the pro rata area required compared with the entire sub-watershed. Using the phorphorus removal rates, the gross assimila tive capacity v^as comouted (as shown in Table 2) and compared with the pollution load for each area. This was then converted into a percentage of the marsh required to balance the phosphorus load fron the drainage area. The values shown are based on the assumption that the stormwater is introduced to the narsh by overland flow through grassy areas and is prevented..frcLn short circuiting to the outlet (if there is one). The outlet from any narsh should not be improved without careful study to assure that the detention storage tine is not affected under normal operation. The potential duck pond areas were calculated by subtracting the beneficial effect or sufficient pernanent water area with emergent vegetation to just balance the assimilation capacity of the remaining narsh with the •anticipated pollution load. It tvas assumed that the normal duck pond construction procedure would be to excavate in areas presently covered with shallow water. If nornallv dry areas are utilized for this purpose, only one-fifth of the stated area can be excavated. d I a 1 TJ VI-6 r I i *« I m I I I I I I %• I I a • • I I i I I high wate^r narks or on a field survey dcternination utilizing lexisting topographical naps. Establishnent of accurate boundaries i^uld aie the City and individual property owners.,.'^ resolving technical and legal questions rcLixing to the lake and marsh shorelines. These include problems rela tive to building setback, flop<l^ plain elevations, land valuation and tasation./' The acquisition of marginal land for environeptal purposes such as open space and trail use uould'^also be facilitated. b. Since the shoreline marsh areas are essentially part of the lake and generally within its normal high water elevation, i^^'is recommended that they be pro tected by the Cit/. Review of changes to shoreline marshes is now required by\the Lake Minnetonka Con servation District and the Hinnehaha Creek Watershed District, c. it is recommended that a marsh\shoreline protection program undertaken where required, in order to elimina^ lake water pollution fiHjm slope and bank erosioryf as shown on Figure 8. Thue extent and lo- catio^of the marsh shoreline protection program should be determined by visual observation and in- spe;t?tion, as suggested in Section VII Paragraph B. d. Future new development near of around marsh areas should be studied to eliminate problems of storm water drainage and pollution before construction. D. Long Lake / X 1, Description Long Lake (294 acres) is located in the northern half of the City of Orono and is the second largest isolated body of water within the city boundaries. The entire watershed area is approximately 4,900 acres in size with about 1,950 acres (40%) located in the Cities of Orono and Long Lake, and about 2,950 acres located in Medina (see Figure 9). Long Lake receives flows from a chain of lakes and marshes in Medina and two small lakes in Orono. These lakes are as follows: N VlI-8 I r 1 I1 4 i I ! I 4 \ 1 1 i i I !• J 1 i Elevation Lake -“(no nane) School - • - --(no nane) Wolsfeld Holy Name Lydiard Dickeys (ft. MSL)Acres Location 1,000 7S Medina 990 11 II >12 • f -36 If 994 80 If 976 20 Orono 982 13 • 1 The average level of Long Lake is 944 feet, A fish trap combined with a stop log control is maintained by the DNR in the concrete box culvert outlet structure located north of Old Long Lake Road on the Union Ceme- tary property owned by the City of Orono, From this point, the lake outlet flows are carried via Long Lake Creek and County Ditch No, 27 to Tanager Lake ar.d Lake Minnetonka (see Figure 2). 2. Simulated Storm Water Runoff Hydrology A simulation of a 24-hour, 100-year storm was done on the Long Lake Watershed, The Long Lake Watershed has a very intricate flow network with many sub-watershcds flowing into others. For instance, sub-watershed LL14, which is located mostly in Medina (see Figure 2) flows into LL4 and then directly into Long Lake, This flow network is interesting because of its volume, LL14 has 2 950 total acres and discharges into LL4 at a rate of 195,3 c,f,s, (see Table 1), LL4 then temporarily stores part of this water and discharges into Long Lake at a rate of 90,8 c.f,s. This type of situation exists to a certain degree in many of the other sub-watersheds. Marshes and Wetlands The total watershed area consists of approximately 1,950 acres and is comprised of the following catagories: Acres Percent 1,417 11 17 Land (approx,) Marshes and Wetlands (approx,) 208 Lakes 525 To effectively evaluate the marsh and wetlands areas within this watershed, they were analyzed for pollution from storm water runoff and potential pollution assimi lation within each sub-watershed. a. Quality VII-9 the entire narsh plus additional area is needed to effectively treat the incoming pollution. Excep tions to this are LL6a, LLlla, and LLllb. Those marshes all have comparatively large acreage and arc able to assimilate relatively large pollution loads. b. Quantity Each marsh was analyzed for its ability to control the water runoff from a 24-hour, 100-year storm. Seven out of 22 marshes in this watershed needed less than their total acreage to control the storm water runoff with a fluctuation less than one half foot. It must be noted that all of these marshes three sub-watersheds and a majority are located with in two sub-watersheds. 4. Recommendations a. In order to establish storm water storage capeity, it is recommended that control weirs be placed at Dickeys Lake and Lake Lydiard, provided that higher lake levels are feasible and acceptable to the prop erty owners. b. Erosin in the creek channel between Long Lake and Holy Name Lake and V/olsfeld Lake could be decreased by construction of control weirs at the outlets of the latter two lakes. c. Long Lake's shoreline marsh boundaries should be established based on existing or historical high water elevations which are available from the DNR. d. Any new construction within or affecting the drain age area of the marshes should be closely checked to _ _ _ _cont'ol problems which could develop. French Lake and T^ager Lake (Hennepin Cou^y Ditch No. 27) 1, Desc'fiption In 1915 the county \itch system/in this area was initiated when the Hennepin Couiity BoardXof Commissioners appointed iV. E. Stoopes to surveXand J<ay out a system to improve the drainage in the vieof French Lake and Tanager Lake (note* Tanager LakerOs called Round Lake or Mud bkke on U.S.G.S. topogix<ph\^al sheets and Hennepin County records). A map showing the Effected are^within the government meandered boundaXes of the abovVmentioned lakes, to gether with th^p^creages of marsh a^d dry areas and the VII-10 -LlSa 23.0 1.5 2.5 56 79.58 142 1.48 3.45 234 1 reach Lake Watershed • RLla 12.0 1.5 .5 16 41.52 260 .87 2.05 ■ 236 ;RL2a 10.0 2.0 5.0 108.0 55.36 51 2.0 ‘ RL2bm 13.8 .2 .6 12.8 47.75 373 OTAL 29.8 2.2 5.6 120.8 103.11 2.35.4.62 197 • RL4a 8.0 1.0 2.0 44 27.68 63 1.0 .96 1.51 157 r To: From: Date: Subject: Chairman Schrt>edt*r and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Mtx>rse. Cii> Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 14, 1994 #1963 James and Camille Farley/Engen & Kozojed & /\ssociatcs, Inc., 15 Orono Orchard Road South - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB, Single Family Residential Two Acre Application: Request for lot width variance. Proposal is to remove existing house and replace with a new residence. Pertinent Code Sections 1 Section 10.03, Subd. 4. Prohibitions - Ir is unlawful to convert, enlarge, reconstruct or alter any struemre or use any struemre or land for any purpose or in any manner which is not in conformity with the zoning chapter. 2. Section 10.28. Subd. 5 (B) - Required lot width in the RR-IB zone is 200 as measured at the front setback line. Pertinent Facts Existing lot width = 80 ’ Required lot width = 200 ’ Variance = 120 ’ List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - Application Plat Map Property Owners ’ List Summary' Site Plan Description of Request Hardship Statement Site Plan Drafts and Final Plan Septic Design House Elevations (reversed) House Plans (reversed) Zoning File #1%3 September 14. I9Q4 Page 2 Discussion Applicants propose to remo\e the existing house and construct a new residence. In their initial attempts to incorporate the existing house into the project, they concluded after discussions with staff that rather than request side setback variances to expand the existing house located about 20’ from the Luce Line, it would be more prudent to start from scratch. The lot is triangular shaped and only 50’ wide where it abuts Orono Orchard Road. At the 50’ front setback line, the width is 80’. The functional width at the house and garage ranges from 110-150’, and the 30’ side setbacks for the RR-IB zone can easily be met. Since the existing residence to the nonhwest is 400’+ distant, and there is no adjacent residence to the south, the narrow nature of the lot has little impact. The fact that the new house will be funher back where the lot is wider is a positive improvement. and F. Please review the applicent’s description of request and hardship statement. Exhibits E Options for Action 1 Recommend approval as proposed. Recommend approval with conditions 3. Table, requesting additional information. Recommend denial. 5.Other. r CITY OF ORONO * VARLANCE APPLICATI Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) property INFOR>1ATION . Site Address IS 0^6^^ -1 JL' A’- .-TTv AU4- f "C * **. *• Aw’wV^VVVVV Vw* A* 4. vA' • VVV4 ^ . • * ^ y fims 'W .C Jv wv I’a *Iv ‘a I V » • v V ' ' Propert)' Identification Number (P I D.) Date Pmpetp^cquired----------------------- I (do)<^do,h^‘ilso own t^ adjacent parcels Present use of propem': X_residential __ Zoning District; -------------- other (specifv*) ------—_^ ^ I * ~ r^inAddress; ^*L OW’NER (if different than applicam) City; Mti- Zip:_5$^^ Phonahome) Address: |^OflAJP Phone (work) ______ Cii>-: DESCRIKTION OF REQLTST „ Estima^C^tm=rio„Cos.S_Sa£,tfOO-------- Describe request in detail: 3€t -------------------" (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQLIREI^ ___Lot Area Cot W idth Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specif)') HARDSHIP/DESCKHTION of preveming Describe undue hardship or pracucal diflicuU) or unusuai y y _______ compliance with Zoning Code rettuirements.— —. fttrxJko Ulig: (anach additional sheets .f necessary) V \ I required sl ^bmittals i All nf the following information mu^ be submitted bv the application deadline datt in orcKj: for vour application to be_con sidered complete: \/ Completed Application Form Cenified Propern Owners List of owners w ithin 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin Count) Department of Finance. A-603. Govt Center. 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of Surv’cy (signed by a licensed urv.yor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) cop) 8Vi .x 11 for / reproduction. _ y Topographic survev (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade ~ are proposed. In Edition, provide one (1) copy x 11" for reproduction.^ V Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8Vi" x 11 ). List of the legal names (include marital status> of all persons with an interest in the rropenv. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owncr(s). g K1/4 As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list ot any other person.s you w ish notified of this application. 9 Additional items as may be requested by City stall. The Applicant and Propertv Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vmir .■|.pli,-..tion is not complete if Ihe nliovejnjonnatiun hy not heen.inoltirictl^ 5. 6. 7. 8 Optionees; A-i fn) i LIST OF LEGAL NASTES iProperty Owners: James C. and CamUle A. Farky 15 Orono Orchard Road Orono, Minnesota 55391 Enfen & Kozojed and Associates Timothy R. Engen Denise M. Komjed 315 Manitoba Avenue Wayafa, Minnesota 55391 r '*/ '■>, Oai'll7'53 ORONO GOLF COURSE (UNaATTEO) KUN DATE M/ZS/n%BATCN 004 HtNNCPlN COUNTY PHOPtATY INTOPtlATlON SYSttM PftOPCITY OHHERS LIST PtPOPT MO. P14SS^01 PACE IS •-NWOP AOOP OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 02-117-25 22 0001 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE OP HINN STATE OP MINN tONR)(LUCE LINE TRAIL)38 02-117-23 22 0002OOOIS ORaO ORCtURO R9 JAMES C FARLEY JAICS C FMLEV 15 ORONO ORCHARD RO SO HAYZATA (0) 55351 38 02-117-23 22 000300038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO CARGILL MAC MILIAM JR ETAL lONGRIOGE ASSOCIATES P 0 BOX «300 DEPT 28 MPLS t** SSA40 ^ .♦' 'i' •■ * PROP AOOR , .0»tCR NAME .(TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 58 03-11T-73 11 000100058 ADDRESS UNASSI9C0 CARGILL MAC MILLAN JR ETAL LONGRIOGE ASSOCIATES P O BOX 5300 OEPT 28 MPLS MN S5440 38 54-118-25 44 000300135 ORONO ORCHARD RO N EDMUND M P RYOELL EDMUND RYOELL 135 ORONO ORCHARD RO LONG LAKE )t« 55354 58 35-118-23 33 000400025 ORONO ORCHARD RO N R J A T B SPENCER KEITH J A THERESA 8 SPENCER . r . V'4 .:5 ORONO ORCHARD RO NLONG LAKE m 55354 4 ’ An-fV■f ADOU CMCn NAHE TA)9AYCil KAHI/ADOt 5t 55-118-25 S5 OOOf 00020 O80N0 ORCHARO RO NCNCYCNNE LAKO COMPAMY NQHELt r FREEMAN 20 ORONO ORCHARD RO MAYATA NN SSl^l KTOTAL BATCH QQA 0Q0Q7 ;V • t <rk' «» . • i- JS i . V • A 4 ' %V r"‘ t, * . * ^8 *.'A,> • ♦ 4 ■ ' *1' ■ ’L ■ *1 Rp ' . * I .*• f . <• \ 0 Pi X* 1 r-’’ i BHi * V ^ *< Ju V V X I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HE)*)EPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST or MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIE •■••V t >. > i <■ '.. *v i‘- .Tf.* ■ . . A If Ip •• r- ff.( JMj> )<*• .f ^ • r*-\* i i •n ii.: m t ♦ 5 »>1 ■ > . Ir I '•' T i; t H. _ t * ^ , t ' - A . ;•« O'-!’' * ff. ' '•■‘It'* ■•'ij*.L." 8 • f. • f (B • V * * fc ^ t 8 t \ '.V 3i;. \T 'A T; V' V V '' V\' 7\ vti1 \\ \ '^ V'V '\ 'Sj'i'vi ,.A;^'-m V. \ \\ \Jv \ \ \ \ X "(f \ y> , vv''^'V\\y. \\, \ , _. ^•>' i\- W:Jc'\l' x \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ I'r \ ) \\ \ N \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ V.\\K X \ \ \ \ \ \\ v\ ^ \ vr \\ \ \ J 1 * * * I’h> \ \ A \ K >\\ N \ \ \\ \ S \ i\ % >\ \ \ ,^5‘ x: \ !^. \ \ <A ^ \ Xv > 'V\\',l' \ \ \\ \ \ ./ ‘jfiW'ji! -/I ^ y'X;; f )1 5 1 ?1 «S S 3? ■' d }■T> ? X S.i'' D ^ ^ n? 2™ m T^C' ‘'3 5^ 5 m & /; / / / fi i*e” »■' >> ' i\ > I I k ’. v,f n\x I v\ ’ \ \ f / \ ’$x/ / ' - vn< 1'. % ' ;' />.' ;! \‘§i^'/ A V' ' •' r € description of request ir—* Ko»ii«d and Associates, the applicant, and James and Camifle Farley, property owner, “a.h. CuTof Oron, ,o co„,.ruC a sii.,1. Fa»l, R«.d«K, on the 4J87 acre site located at 15 Orono Orchard Road- He note. 11 The eaidim parcel which has housed a single family residence unusual Shane does no! conform to the Cit. of Orono ’s 200- from width I^^^H^remenls Us acres and approximately 191.IW ^ requiremems 1 he proposed plan at completion will have a hardcover of Ol (See Survey) A variance for Lot width is required to conform to applicable zoning regulations. The applicant and owner have worked closely for some 13 jjj! exisUng parcel The original redevelopment plan was to remodel the existing ho^ using tL^xisting basement and footprint and drive system. A bv sLhre-Bergq^sts revealed thi> existing house and foundatj^ did ^ "j; haSt r«,uifcm.nt from Ut. pr<H«.y Un. (adja«m Lu„ ^.) driveway svstcin encroached upon the Luce Line (See drive and foundation to be at least 60 years of age. In order to mccl the srt back rcquircmenis and provide sitt access. Ihe house and driveway system was redesigtied within the property lines. Bv moving the honse location to meet set back requirements the parcel ^mes an uitdeveloM •«« Note these Exhibits and their purpose Exhibit 1 - Property Survey Exhibit 2 . Originally prepared Site Plan and Topographic Map showing encroachments and house set back problem • Exhibit 3 - Revised Site Plan and Topographic Map Showing new house and drive location, meeting all set back requirements • •Note New Sewer System Design - Mound System XL r HARDSHIP AND DESCRIPTION OF LNl SIJAL PROPERTV' CONDITION The jthape of the property does not allow conformity to the City of Orono’s 200’ frontage requirement. The residential property is a buildabic site of 191,109 square feet, 4..187 acres. Adjacent land to assemble 200’ is wetlands. The applicant and owners intended to remodel and reconstruct the existing single famils residence but a survey revealed the exiting home (foundation age we believe to be 60 years or older) did not meet the set back requirement from the Luce Une, property line. Furthermore the driveway system used for the property all these years encroached upon the same property line. (See Exhibit II) Redesign was commissioned attempting to salvage the existing house and foundation and request a variance from the 30’ set back for the existing house. However, even with a variance for the existing foundation the drive system could not be redesigned within the property lines and allow adequate turning radius. We intend to rebuild without the existing foundation or house and meet all side set back requirements. To rebuUd without the existing footprint makes the parcel and undeveloped lot subject to Orono’s 200’ frontage requirement. A variance is then request^ because of the shape of the lot and with adjacent wetlands to the North and the Luce Line T to I to the Muth, a shape which cannot be altered by acquisition of vacant lands. This is a umque situation and strict enforcement would cause undue hardship. The Proposed Home and Site Plan Includes: • A revised site entrance which improves the dangerous Intersection beneath the Luce Line Bridge • A sophisticated new mound system • Additional berms and buffer zones to the Luce Line Trail • Elaborate natural landscape plan which includes reforestation techniques in the forested areas • Retention of the natural terrain and runoff • Architecture in harmony with the country atmosphere of its surroundings See - Exhibit I - Survey Exhibit II - Original Site Plan and Topographic Map denoting side set back issues Exhibit III - Revised Site Plan and Topographic Map •HI 6 -) 1 ilJ 'O Q 4 ir O •W/’ i;^-*^Vsv&rrTL• • • A •5» • • •••- <_ -i^M^ V.-V:-— rr^. r»>K**<k<WAtar NOTl*: .—»V « ■♦■•rr«*c •« »•€« *""'‘■'30 wSrSSisSr narr* ■—■■* -^2? •2l»'"* * ^ ” “■" *«»3* JMM2 IS OMNO ONCHAND MV OmMMmHtrnmrn —» r\«*f€. ::i. ^1- fro # i O Q" X ^£vh,«,r1IE ^tTB*cVc Apl*ni %\\mt Uc«n^ Snen^t^t ItONONOOflOtMOIIC furt^ •—^ <*« ^ jAT— 1- £ t -fyy - V * ^ j . 1 CT*><yYC^t? *« -.V> S *Vto‘otion Tests ^ 5o»t SorrKjs € Be^c*^ Vafk ScQit 1"* V-? P^C^ERTY fP ^ * » t ^* •*■>**> *“* *.^* Ncte Th*s 5^ste-n is to be constructed to meet the Winneic.J Potlutcn Control Aqer^y C..^:,ter 7wrv> 4 Local Orcinance Mote : Check all underground utilities ! S-PTES TING /Ar. Ces'»7nej By V^C^^ * Cc*e PH €2-497-I!66 4 V ffFFW^pmui tll{iU-r(^ •• S::li -•!! :!'ill^l : % •• •!• r*t' .1 •••^t v*^'i • .•# . - i '“*1 ^4 » i . t * •■^ V. * r# V /OOT-? ; PAMC P^POSV^ Auv_ VA^Ayy 't -Tvic v^-r a-crrts Tryrr^ « 6*H>re. c*vi-yvcuuT)co jfgv*^ V -fgV -V CX'^.TiQi, -ric. - ^ - ■" <••. ■ I ;TVyvc<g*« ^ ^ ^Vco’otion Ttsti Sfftt# 1‘Lj} ^r«3‘f Bof«gt € Bex- Ma'»» pr^fcjY CP <%^- »* * -> r , '» t *' v , ^ • - — . Note : Check all unJercjround utilities Nc:< Thf* n to be constructed lo meet ttif Pgllutoo Con^ro' Agency C.iA^Ler »onu 4 Local Ordinance ' S-PTTSn\>GfM:. 0<Viy>td By' ~ri j r.- 0:‘* -1 PH e2-497-J!S6 \ r-JT^............. iiliiilliR b!IH|.R(_ - __ I < ' / ■ n»' i;4 V, :• tt ••!<••• ^Itl §•••if fit Itli•§• !•• ttt• •• ••• lit _ ••• ••#■■ V| ■■N«»9t eievAiieH Mt»t ett¥ATm4 41. -^1 7T fi X • 2Lt\ I ■¥ i i' §1 i:• . ------------ h TFKMId)JEX!M>IDE]UHOlUIO]t i/ ‘ rr «. I ' KBir.&TT iPILAMS #1 r; o .-•/ 0--V, VtjP' WMB fAO 4. rs I lLa. \ To: From: Date: Subject: /3 Chairman Schrocdcr aiKl Oronc Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning *S: Zoning Administrator September 12, 1994 #1964 Calvaty Memorial Church, 2420 Dun^-oody Avenue - V'ariances-Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Application: Request for variances for proposed signage List of Exhibits A - B - C D - E - F - G - II - I - Application Plat Map Property Ownera List Letter of Request Drawing-Proposed Sign Sur\ey/Sitc Plan Existing Signage Notes/Sketch Resolution No. 886 Code Section 10.61. Subdivisions 1, 2 and 3 Pertinent Code Sections 1. 2. 3. Section 10.61, Subd. 2 (A) (3) - Allows one sign for each use allowed by conditional use permit - up to 12 s.f, per surface (assumes two surfaces). Section 10.61, Subd. 2 (C) - Maximum allowed height of any sign is 8’ above the average grade level. Section 10.20. Subd. 3 (A). (B) - Churches and church schools are a conditional use in a single family residential zone. Discussion The applicants, represented by Glenn Heinsch, request variances for signage square footage to construct a third sign on the property. The proposed sign is shown in Exhibit E. It is a wall sign that will be illuminated by interior tlorescent tubes and in total is approximately 45 s.f . being approximately 8’ wide and 8’ hieh centered on a brick wall that is approximately 10-12’ high. The location is shown on the site plan. Exhibit F. Zoning File ><^1964 September 12, 1994 Page 2 There are two other existing permanent signs on the property. A free-standing 8 ’ high by 8' wide illuminated sign is on the property at the comer of Dunwoody and Count) Road 15. Also, flush-mounted lettering. "Calvary Memorial Church" is on the west side of the building facing Dunwoexly. The existing signage totals approximately 103 s.f. and the new sign will bring the total to approximately 148 s.f. Assuming the church and school arc a single entity. Section 10.61, Subd. 2 (A) (3) would allow one sign with two 12 s.f. faces for a total of 24 s.f. Note that the new sign will replace a temporary' banner hanging on the north wall. Variances Required : • Square footage for an individual sign (12 s.f. allow^ed, 45 s.f. proposed). • Signage square footage (24 s.f. allowed. 148 s.f. proposed). • Maximum height of sign will be approximately 9’ (8 ’ allowed). Statement of Hardship Please review the applicant ’s letter of request regarding the need for signage on the property. Also note that in neither Resolution No. 886 approving a conditional use permit for Calvary Memorial Church and school, nor in the 1983 variance and CUP for construction of an addition, was the issue of signage discussed. As a comparison, note that the B-1, B-2 and B-4 districts would allow 1 s.f. of signage for each front foot of b« ?'ding plus 1 s.f. for each front foot of lot not occupied by a building, with a maximum individual sign not to exceed 50 s.f. It this property was zoned commercially, it would likely be allowed nearly 500 s.f. of signage along County Road 15. Options of Action 1. Recommend approval of conditional use permit amendment and variance as profK^sed, stating hardships and conditions. (One reasonable condition would be removal of the temporary banner sign). 2. Table, requesting additional information or revision. 3. Recommend denial, stating reasons. 4.Other. r ft 1 o ^ reqitred sl bmittals AU o f the following information must he submitted.hyJhengplicntLon^^ in ordsr for vour application to be considered completei 1. ttm m 3. 4. Completed Application Form ----Cenified Propert>- Owners List of owners within 150’ (you musi obtain this list from Hennepin Count}' Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 34S-32 71). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) cony x 11" for ToJ^rap^^^^^ (e.xisting and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'^" x 11" for reproduction.^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons w ith an interest in the property. Tlhs would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). ,aS an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list ot any other persons veu wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Prepern- Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour vnrinnrr nnniicniion is not co mpile if the ahove informat inn has not been incItidetL mtpptoJ hefe'b^y^gJ^T^ provide all information required or requested Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (suff ttae not covered ‘>5' and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of tfas application and certifies that th information supplied is/lme and correct to th^sbest ot his/her knowledge. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. w>t.DateApplicant’s Signature m owKr\ere*by Kta^edees and agrees to this application and funher entry onto the propettv bv City staff, consulunts, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purpose{b|(in>:est^aUon ^d verification of tht?^request. /l<yrirJe{^‘ BateOwner’s Signature Applicant .nust have ^li^ituls into the CiT offices 25 days before Meetino Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of Apph“^« must be preset., at all scheduled review meetings of the and CouncU, If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, Pf to have an authorized agent anend in your place and to advise the Buildmg 5. Zoning Off this change prior to the meeting. S r RUN OITI HCNTJEPIM COUNTY PROPfRTT IHTDfmATION SYSTtW PROrfRTY CMN(PS LISTBATCH MlSwm» amOMNEK NAME TAXPAYERtum/um SS 17-H7-25 55 «0«» 05840 SfORELINE OR OAVIO UWENOCKCR OAVIO UMBEHOCKEII 5840 SHORELINE OR HAYZATA MN 55541 50 17-117-25 55 000405850 SHORELINE OR S MTAIHEN ■ • L tATAMEN STEPHEN RATAINEN 407 PAYtC AVE ST PAUt 744 55101RROR AOOR{ : 0»0CR NAME TA)9AYERNAHi/AOOR 30 17-117-25 54 000505770 SHORELINE DR HARY SOHNS ETAL HARY SOHNS R O tOK 2NAVARRE fO« 55542 50 17-117-25 5405740 SHORELINE OR PAUL H LARSON PAUL N LARSON 10 SHORELINE PL SPRING PARR »0I 55584• ,, PROP AOOR ■ fPOCR NAHi TAXPAYER I ' . NIKE/ADORI* •58 20-117-25 21 000102444 OUNHOOOY AVE LAHRENCE T HENDERSON LAMRENCE T WtOERSON 2444 OIMRIOOY AVE HAYZATA m 55541 50 20-117-25 21 000202440 OUtOIOOOY AVE OETMETT C OOltCV BENNETT C OOMNEY 2475 SHAOYMOOO RO EXCELSIOR NN 55551 « ■ . ; PROP AOOR . 0M4ER NAHE V. TAXPAYER i i- NAHE/AOOR 50 20-117-25 21 0004 02474 0«4«X»Y AVE AUDREY C OCLANO AUDREY 0 OCLANO 2474 DLMRXnY AVE HAYZATA M« 55541 50 20-117-25 21 0007 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIOCO LANRENCE T HENDERSON LANRENCC T HEraCRSON 2444 IXPMOOOY AV HAYZATA m 55541 PROP AOOR 7 (MCR NAME i. TAXPAYER NAHE/AOORV SB 20-117-25 21 OOIB 02420 D1M«)00Y AVE CALVARY MENORIAL CHURCH CALVARY HEHORIAL CHURCH 2420 OimnOY AVE HAYZATA M4 55541 50 20-117-25 21 0025 05745 SHORELINE DR »•« ENG LUTH SYNOD GOOD SHEPHERD lirTH CHURCH 5745 SHORELINE CRIVE HAYZATA HN 55541 PROP AOOR O OMCR NAME„Vr taxpayer NAME/AODR 50 20-117-25 22 0000 02405 ouroRxxrr ave LOUIS 0 OBERHAUSER LOUIS 0 OBERHAUSER 2425 OUNHOOOY AVE HAYZATA m 55541 50 20-117-25 22 0004 02425 OUNNOOOV *VC LOUIS B OBERHAUSER LOUIS B OBERHAUSER 2425 OLRMXJDY A*/E HAYZATA HN 55541 . ♦ •4#^%> • REPORT HO. P1455401 PASS 150 17-117-23 5505B00 SWRELINE junr N OLSON JANET N OLSON 5000 SHORELINE OH HAYZATA Et4 55541M50 17-117-25 54 000503740 SHORELIN.- OR BALBOA MIt««SOTA CO BALBOA NIM4CS0TA CO C/0 NCLSH COrVANlES INC 11200 H 78TH ST EDEN PRAIRIE HH 5554450 20-117-23 21 000502400 OUNI«X)OY AVf 0 G HORAN A T A NENOT OAVIO 6 HORAN A TRACY NENOT 2480 01M«X)0Y AVf HAYZATA EM 55541 t » Y** 38 20-117-23 21 0000 0005B ADDRESS UNASSIQCD LAMRENCE r HENDERSON LANRENCE T HEWERSON 2444 OUNHOOLY AVE HAYZATA MN 55541 50 20-117-23 22 0007 05645 SHORELINE OR RATIHRINE MC NAHARA LOUIS B OBERHAUSER 2425 OUNHOOOY AVE HAYZATA Et4 55541 t » .V>7 , •«- I < 4* • ' « . 4 * > ‘ ■ •1*.i I p \ SB 20-117-25 22 0010 02^5S DlM«X)OY AVE HARION O BEISC JAHES C BEISC 2A55 OUrBCOOY AVC HAYZATA MN 5S5Y1 I i I • « «•i:• . ^ . *•\t ' • A 'J ■V * . *f- ^ • • m r I -'v . 4 iui mti m/zwmBATCH 001mop Aixm (MCH NAHC TAKPAYCO NAME/AODII^»»p um0»t€K NAHC .. TAXPAYCR .1. NAHC/AOM S« ZO-117-2S 22 0011 OZ^S 019M000Y AVE A B NELSON CTAL ALVIN • NELSON 2AA5 OIMOOOY AVE HAVZATA m S55«l38 20-117-23 22 001402*75 OUmOOOY AVEJ A A S L 80MERSOAVIB 0 I VICKI 9 VICKERNAN2*25 LY0IA80 CIREXCELSIOR m 55331 HEr«<*IN COUNTY RRORERTY INTORNATlOH SYSTEM WOPEITY 0>*«»S LIST38 20-117-23 22 001202437 OUNMOOOY AVE MARION O BEISE RARICM 0 SEISE 2437 OLM«XX}Y AVE NATZATA «N 555*138 20-117-23 22 001*02485 OU»MOOOY AVE N P HICKEY 166 HICKEY H P HICKEY A 6 A HICKEY 2485 OUMKXXTY AVE MAV2ATA TM 553*1 »» * fV * '< 4 i- 'i • ^ •• i'A , ‘ Vir ‘*f. * .* V 5,' .V,.1 ,/S ,j! •7,' • i * '4\ : ‘ f * I i. NO. RI43540L HA6E 238 20-117-23 22 001302445 Dl»8«OOOY AVE R V LWBEMOCKER ETAL ROBERT UMBEHOCKER 24*5 0Ur8RX)0Y AV HAYZATA l«4 553*1TOTAL BATCH 001 00023 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RERRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECOCOS or THE MCJOiEPlN COUNTY OCPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF NY KN0HLED6E ANO BELIEF. DATE U<MLuJ .4E¥• p ,f• V •r :•• *•j**i»«/f ■ *'1 * .* V u , ' ■ ? I f . V — : j- ' -*./■ ' t t -5 ‘ J . » . <>1 r. * A ^ *;• 1^ys: : M: 8»- t’.' r jL August 26. 1994 Cit> Planning Comnris^n Dear Sirs: to have an attraclKe >ipi idicttising out presence to the Itallie on Shoreline Once We understand ihe liinitations on posting signs in Orono. WMe >ve respect the ssisdom in placing these liniirarions on signage. «e feel that i. ssould be an uneccssatj- hardship on us •» sign on our building. With the distance from the road, the sign xsould not be casil> sccn and read. Ilu. vsfuld defeat our reason for putting it there in the first place Because ol the distance trom the road and the necessity of ha%ing a sign to proclaim our presence here. «e request that we bc^oued t.> place an attractKe sirm that measures 3 6- x 8\ which is 24 sq ft. We also request that we be allowed to have subieens WTiuen on the books that make up the stem of the sign, since this is an important part o. the attracth eness of the sign and the would not be recognized as books without the pnniing on t cm hax ing it illuminated. This option is not feasible for us because it would pose a satety studeL when ihcv arc plaung outside It would be unreasonable to expect that the> would m t be attracted to play around the s|n*tlights or climb on them, since they would be right next to an ciitraiKc o the school building. lliank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Sincerely, Calx ar\ Memorial Christian School Calvary Memorial Christian School Terri Linden. School Administrator 2420 Dunwoody Ave Wayzata MiN 55391 (612) 471-8511 J 800-84»-4262 i. < ft IIirb ■'W * 1 BOOKS ^ \ H' Cal) I net :r-(V Legs i ^;r '-Ji "i • *-v»« i •' ^ 'Ei S!I3 SS ISd '•r^ ?-j:rTi 5^5 ................i .-.tja 'Siii iS35 d m - i •m:-^.\ fy^~^-i '• ■- I ;;-'^■ ' .tA *M» •' •^-'^ i^r-.fiZi L»;;....«i3 E'‘li 5^JSa 7*^ weti’rr";^ • rf. « J** V. - . ..■ . ^ ' -IF »rf3Sr ...1 iJii - • • • ♦CALUARY MEM0Rlf)L CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 'tvU‘1 : ’?■ ■; ■'» :.^;j 4Tft ?/—•» tmm BT- » c,',. y*4^'4 *:,-urs:n; v:^_5an SCHOOL OPEN TUESDAY. SEPTEMBER 6 WELCOME BACK! 2iEs:oss TO3 »SS fK-?!3ES SE^ ''■••-:? ^.\ »• V# i« .*1^ »*. % rlTJcv -^Sij£ V4inc‘.u:v Jki i »•• *1 ;^®srss»®«s •^'S mrs E5?;5*3 '-’■s- frg^-^ r-r'T'*'! f ‘j^ SfcjiilAtciT Hit ■-»•;*« :»•» ns^waj )E^;'^*j yjrc^?. r, 'yr- *• <«. •.'Oft• •“/—^'Oft*-.4 M •*<;Si ss'1513 Emm MATH D)C V (0 tt »5 '*« __Jl ^12S jSrSg iifei^ !^ d I !^:?T:f7?' ^ i»ai ^ ^ .13 }f^:-wry.vtr-wKgi -r^ ------------------ItaMMi - rzssEss^ d Thi'. ( olor -kcti h prrnidt'd an t-xamplf i;t lolor. 'h.TO IS no f.ao ni.iiih h.-'Aivn mk and pamr. Sik-.ns rtus d<'e- not pjarantf- ixh. r !500-«4a-42f>2 JLt-'/ 7'*. *>1 BOOKS .T J'b " \ 8' Cabinet ' L 3'-G' Leus 0kmA ~±'i ‘-y -I I 'v ;..'*-. J ^ ■ . i -i—i - . . - - - r~r-r^» -«•■ » r <«gf :;»,T~-T^ TrTTT^ TTr"TJt T-f^.^rv '5 !* *-':'^*V} ;*■"] . ^ ■ - —-T'*^ ■"■ ‘""^TT*’ ■» !■ rg ________________________________________ *'--■■'1 :i ri • J 4 *:•« • ■ •»* .4.Y,»x -»u TT*r?r ^ i/ "*<> ;f>jiijid f:I r» f —* ?; .•»r^' trX* CALUflRV MEMORIAL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6 WELCOME BACK! \r-; '^\ni ft- 1^ SsSlx-wi-iiSc wfe vr-.i r a-irj:.-j. -w -3 ^ »<>y ^-■rrrfr'it^-: Mk'«v04»M ;ij'fOi^r f ^ » 1 *. , *r »5 “ ''^vir';jT| _ 13 ^-'sa S2S ZS3^2S :iii t. 07 /1. i^n - I'S ■ ^ • - * • ‘ ^ V Ita^ain ^ y 1, -C ^ ^ <T / y This roior sketch .s provided as an There 'S no e^act mjtcn between mk and paint. Signs Plus does not guarantee such.\ -..............................- -V. __op 2^t//Ji>*J®^^ Y _____ _ CAL\JM'i' . IMC'/«^|'--V- Ci*M;’-c.K 3 " If jo' • 7.^ -sr , s ..____ i ' RESOLUTION NO. 886 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH WHEREAS the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and Calvary Memorial Church; and WHEREAS. Calvary Memorial Church has stated intentions of using the building for church services and leloted function and for parochial school classes and related functions. WHEREAS, the City of Orono Zoning Code, Sections 34.530, 34 020, 34.021 and 34.022 specifically authorize such churc and school use by Conditional Use Permit in residential zoning districts: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the the City of Orono, Minnesota, hereby approves “Conditional Use Snnit Lr Calvary Memorial Church subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. The land and building shall be used for church and/or ™hool functions as allowed by the Orono Zoning Code Sections ^^'^^^^^ugjJ'be^provided for off-street parking of^airvehicles at all times with no on-street parking allowed FuLr7bu??d?ng expansion plans shall be -^Ject to review and City Council approval and amentoent Use Permit, and such future expansion My scope due to insufficient lot area or off-street parking at^Co^cil reserves the right to review and Mend this Conditional Use Permit upon ® receipt of complaints from nearby ne g r 5. Calvary Memorial Church shall review and approve of this resolution, which approval shall be indicated by the endorsement of an authorized representative hereon, and shall cause an original copy of this resolution to be filed in the chain of title of the property within thirty (30) days of the approval of this resolution by the City Council, or of the closing date of the church purchase of the property, which ever is later. AGREED: S- ]a 1 va ry__Memo r ia liXhlumh / Dated this li day of March , 19 78 . Walter B. Massengale, Acting Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORCNO TTi6 undGrsign6d duly qualified and acting City Clerk/ Administrator of the City of Orono hereby certifies that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the original Resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Orono on March 16 • approving t!ie CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT on file in the office of the City Clerk/AdininiTtrator, City of Orono. WalterHenson, Clerk/Administrator Dated this day of March , 19 78 (Seal) 'ator S 10.60 within a building or fully screened so as not “ 1^33 rhin 20 feet in length, which are not stored for commercial ur-oses, if stored to the rear of the house and a dista...e feet or more from any property line. Source: Ordinance no. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 Subd. 14. Waste Materials. Waste “Let washed into the public storm ^ “ do so fLftL system without first having ./thoLL disLsal shall beCity. If said permit is not granted, a ‘»«thod of dxsposax s devised which will not require the permanent operation and will ^^^use solid ‘form rather than adjacent land. Should tne fenced as to be fluid, the storage area ail districts, all waste material, removed from public view. I" in use for debris, o1hi/w\Ve r^ulatL herein shall be kept in an LcS building or --“'^and'" hL^'ra^LfoLLi^ for ^LLA“7ucr;acar Un^frel o7 La"s^e^^L^e^^\\^ and nosicus weeds. ,. 1.J 1- nr. inane No land shall be developed and no use Shall L'peLitted that resul^ts^.in^^ runoff L^ptr^y'chInn%7e"°LL" a Lorm drain, water course, ponding area or other suitable facility. e K/? Traffic Control. The traffic generated by any Subd. , rontrolled in a manner that wil.^ avoiduse shall be channelized and contrail excessive traffic congestion on ' Veh^les bac.>^ing from a parking space through residential *, • street No access drive to any lot shall not back anv^ ^ intersecting streetShall be located witnin 20 feet o. right-of-way lines. „ J-,Fhr No activities shall be Subd. 17. e °^Hio activity bevond enclosed areas, permitted that emit dangerou ^ adversely affecting the There shall be no electrical including but not limited ?r?LiraL' LTevTsTon °Lep’^icS other than that of the creator of the disturbance. SEC. 10.61. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. ‘itr A’.ffnv;".."?;..'*?” «”•accessory use m all district regulations: ORONO CC 379 (4-1-84) r S 10.61 A. on Right-Of-Way. Private the Council within the public fi^ht-of-way or easements excep^ ‘aetorations -£--n^t^i:Saru.: ;rr:\^t^*/or"ru%?°: ,^i.rrh'a\l3 La^ea;h the ecu c,,U'i*n conditiona 1 use pentat or temporary sign pe.mit na the previous 24 months to that property. Source: Ordinance 55, 2nd Series Adopted: 7-25-88 B. Flashing. Illuminated flashing signs shall not be permitted in any district. C. Beams. 11 “^^ns or devices givin^^^^ V'r io ‘n'c?n“r!fion'“£*«ys o^rtlghWha^rnot be permitted in any district. 0. sales Signs o °U^n ^^g^"a^reTeVrpe°^ leasing property, a yard of such property to be surface may be placed within be less than fifteen feet sold or leased. Such sign fiat aaainst the structure. For from the right-of-way line un residential project of six or th*» purpose of selling or promot g exceed ■^8 square feet; a rnore^ dwelling units, one an industrial acrea of commercial area of ^ to exceed 96 feet of advertising ten acres or more, one sign ^j-oiect site. Such sign shall not surface may be erected remain after 90% of ^he project is aevei Ci-rrn«s existing on September 14, ^’‘^loJm'^to^the regulations are a non-conforming 1967 which do not conform to tne reg use. , F. Traffic ^"'^®^^®^®”coior^would”inte^rf^^^^ in any that, by reason of or purpose of a traffic sign orway with the proper functioning or y signal. . G. Building Hall ^510^3"°^*!®!'’no? be directly on the s°ilAar’structure or « painted on a fence, , signs shall not be permanent y district. Paper and by an adhesive or similar attached directly to a permitted per standards set means (temporary use of this Section). Signs shall forth in subparagraph « °/__^gried to another structure, considered as a structure or fastenea Source: Ordinance 97, 2nd Series Adopted: 8-26-91 (ORONO CC 380 (4-1-84) 5 10.61 H. Tenporary Signs. There shall be no more than 4 temporary business signs issued per calendar year# and period of not more than 10 days per time or of the duration of the event promoted by the sign message, whichever is less. The sign (includes banners or balloons), sign supports, or portable stana shall be removed from public view at the end of the period. area of the sign shall not exceed 32 square feet per surface (64 s.f. total signage allowed for 2 sided portable sign). Advertising balloons are not subject to area restrictions but must meet all applicable Federal and State standards. There shall be no than one temporary sign in any required yard area and i. separate multiple signs are proposed, the total area of the exceed 32 square feet. Temporary business signs require a buildi permit from the City. No such permit shall be issued by the City If a conditional u.e permit under Section 10. 61, ^ (A)(3) has been issued to a residential property. No sign shall be allowed in residential zones unless permitted a election or sale signs under this subdivision. Multi-tenant buildings shall be considered as a single property for ^ this paragraph, and the use of the single temporary business sign bv tenants on the property shall be the responsibility . . ' property owner or designated manager who shall endorse in writing, all applications for sign permits. The owner or manager of the sign and the owner of ‘he property shall be equally resoonsible for the proper location, maintenance, and removal of the sign. All temporarry signs shall a property so that they do not impede safety by obstructing vision of pedestrians or motor vehicle operators. Source: Ordinance 97, 2nd Series Adopted: 8-26-91 I. Election Signs. Election signs are permitted on private property in any district provided ="=h signs are removed Sithin thirty days following the election as related to the signs. NO ejection Lgn"^shall be permitted in any "J" District sooner than two months preceding the election relating to the sign. ORONO CC 380-1 (4-1-84) (. s 10.61 Subd. 2. Signs in "R" Districts. within "R" Districts, thr following signs are pernitted: A. Naneplates. 1. One nameplate sign for each dwelling and such sign shall not exceed two square feet in area per surface, an no sign shall be so constructed as to have more than f*^*-^**^ * 2. One nameplate sign for each dwelling 9^° . of six or more units, and such sign shall not exceed feet in area per surface and no sign shall be so constructed as to have more than t«o sign for each P«t»>i«ed use or use by conditional perciit other than residential and such sign shall not exceed twelve square feet in area per surface. B. Illumination. Symbols, statues, sculptures and district. Setbacks, Etc. Any sign over one-half square K 11 Kx» hack at least five feet from any property line. diffused or indirect. <?nhH 5 Signs in "B" and "I" Districts. Within thr "B" and -I” Diltrfcts’nameplate signs and business signs are permitted subject to the following regulations: Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 - -n.i- -B-:** and "3-4”: Size. Wichin the "B-1", «B-2- and on^e'Vcuarrfoot f°or Valh space per lot shall not exc cnuare foot for each front foot of irnol°°occupfed "ra b^’u^lding. 'no individuil sign shall exceed fifty square feet. Source: Ordiiance No. 17^ Effective Date; i-1-75 n >R-5-- Size. Within the -3-3" District, the B. B J . crnace oer lot shall not exceed the aggregate square ^oot of building, plus one square sum of four square feet per ^^ont - occuoied by a building. No foot per front foot ProP«rty not by^^^ individual sign surface shall exceea xwu h c J L of ^iaii space per lot shall not exceed the aggregate square footage of sign p f ORONO CC 381 43-1-84) 5 10.61 !s;.u..i .w .!«■"• •"'“ •■'••« «“•" '"■■ Source: Municipal Code^ Effective Date: 9-14-67 n "3-1", -B-2" and "B-4": Heig^^t. «i- «n 1" Districts, no sign shall extend In height twc^feet above the"B-l", "B“ more than principal feet from feet may principal pro^:e^=\Two‘^feVt^n^Ta^^y ‘^:^.^^^ed /ard a.ea e.o. .h. building. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 p -B-3- and "I": Height. Within any “B-3" or^ "I" District, no oiltJrde ^"aU o^r'’ oarapet ^of^ S-fd^r eel” rc°o°:r/onr-o “i- '-o _r o f ff - <» •» t Parking and Loading Sebd. 4. t parking and loading spaces Requirements. iate or oreven\ congestion of the public in this Chapter is to alleviate o a„a general welfare of right-of-way and for off-street the public by ®^®„Voadinq from motor vehicles in accordance parking, loading and parcels of land and structures, with the utilization of c<»rtificate in all districts th^\rb^e^^aVcV™raniil^ra;{f^^^^ iSSlpuInll requirements: Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 A. Application of forth'e^seShlre iS addition to the *^®9ulations and requi^-^ requirements regarding this Chapter, the the required and non-required off-street parking shall PP Y districts: off-street parking facilities in an Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 B. Parking Requirements^JJa^vedJor^Buil^^ ’hich a llfllrnrp°ermTt 1fa'’s\"ee" issued prior to September 14, 1967, but (4-1-84) 38 2ORONO CC r TO: FROM: DATE: V Chaifrnan Schrocdcr and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. Cit> Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator September 16, 1*594 SUBJECT: #1965 James Lear, 2525 Dunwtxxly Avenue - V'ariance - Public Hearing Application: Request for variance and conditional use pennit to construct retaining walls in lakeshore yard to repair a tailing lakeshore bank. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Topography Map F - Sketch of ^oposed Walls G * City Engineer's Comments H - Revised Plan (Rev’d 9/16/94) I - Cross Sections (Reev’d 9/16/94) J - Letters of Transmittal (Rev’d 9/16/94) Discussion Applicant is Gustafson Design on behalf of James Lear, the property owner. This property has a lakeshore bank rising appro.ximately 20’ above the lake with a slope of around 50%. The bank is starting to experience a slump problem on the northerly half ot the property. The applicant initially provided only a conceptual sketch for a wall system. City Engineer Shawn Gustafson requested much additional detail which was not submi ted until midday on Friday, September 16th. Gustafson has not had a chance to comme;it in writing, but his indication to me at 1:15 p.m. today was that while the additional material provided is helpful, it does not appear to be an engineered designed, it appears to be a boulder wall, and he has severe reserv'ations about recommending approval tor boulder walls. The proposal does m)t provide any detail as to the amount of hardcover that will be add<‘d by the walls. A hardcover calculation should also be provided. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends tabling this item until the information submitted to the City Engineer has been reviewed and found acceptable by the Engineer. Planning Commission may want to give applicant conceptual direction in regards to the project. ch £ KJ -lx >: .• •.Vi,^r CITY^ OF ORONO • GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY'LOCATION J Site Address _________^9i/r Tvpe of Arplicaiion to be FUed (^€v\OtT\^vv».\ \X^ tr-{ ■ T x^r^rr.. TH^nrif,ration Numbct (P.I.D.) ZO in ZJ5 ZZ^ €xO/e__________ APPLICANT / r Name* /oa*SrGTS>0n Phone ('home) OWNTR (if different than applicant) Name <=^^75 ^ X~ — Address 7 jIL -. - - -. , - .rVs.i^^yN ■ ■ Phone (work) ~ H2 4^---- iVr _lCit> /OA^ip Phone (home) *-/7 / - 7 ^/O Ciw /GVOvao Phone (work) DateProperty Acquired____________________________—---------------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application S125.00 Residential Accessory^ Use $200.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) " $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apaninents ' $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg " $250.00 Commercial/Indusirial Use $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore PRD'PID - see Fee Schedule ■ • \ $100.(X) Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee Zip (month,''year) X OTHER APPLICATIONS $200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (^ consu.tant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ___ $500.00 Comprehensive Plan .Amendment ______$100.(X) Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY . . , Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify). rTTv u. A I * u*» Z TC i Cl-TTC f '’* ’*• *# If’»«V' A V'VVV'V •Cki V7L.M TiI u , i ’V' A Tf'ir'l i’ V V'rif"i j' w' • Vr*LLTi' 1. t rckil fTrL‘T«7lv.-a* vrviI t I tntm t uw WfV'V'^ MVX f X :)Q ' V i VI?.* tei. required SL^-MITTALS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Prop»en>' Owners List of owners within 350’ (v ou can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Plat Map. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licecised surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital sanis) of all persons with an interest in the property'. T^s would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCU^MENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SM.ALLER) FOR ALL DOCLTVIENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that >our application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff;___________________________Date----------------- APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE ^ w 7 „ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zomng Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff tune not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenseshicurred in review of this apolication. and cenifies that the information supplied is true and co^^ct to the h^tj^f his/hpr l^wledge. Applicant's signature ^ 0\MNTER’S SIGNATURE . . u . ut The owner herebv acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purpos^ of investiganon ^nd-verification of this request. Owner’s signature Dale Applicam mus. have alKubfiMAUllwII^City offices 25 days betoee Uie Planpiog Commssioo Meetipg. Pla^g Commission Meeimgs'^Er^'b Ib^d Mond^y^f ^b »on* ^pU - V”- plane and advUe .be Bnifdmg i Zoning Offiee of this change prior to the meeting. ll V. gustafsorr design Inc August 26, 1994 City of OrofX) Department of Planning & Zoning P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Dear City Officials We are requesting a variance for me Lear Residence at 2525 Dunwoody Avenue to do the following wor1<: Install rip rap along the existing shoreline wimin the given specifications of the City and DNR. Replace existing retaining walls on the hillside and add new walls to retain the hillside where it currently is eroding and sliding toward the lake. Grade in the work area to accommodate the construction of me walls, but not to make substantial changes in existing grade. Install plantings and erosion control materials in place of sod that is eroding and sliding toward me lake. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 J RUN DATC •ATCH QOS COUNTY RROPCRTY IWORmTlON SYSTfH RQOrCRTV OMCRS LXST• J » •RROQ ASM OQCR NANC TAXRAVCR NIHE/AOOR SO tO-117-tS 21 0002 02AA0 Rj«oooy AVe BE^•CTT C OOMCV »CM«rT C DOtCV 2*75 SH40VNOOO RO tXCCLSIOR 1*4 SS3S1^4V AOM 7 0«€M NAhiTAXTAYMNAHi/AOOAr.PROO AIKW 0»0«R NANI TA)(PAYiR NAK/AOm PROP AOOR OMCR NRHI A. TAXPAYfR NAK/AOOR ■f •' ■ •If* .• - ^ . PROP AOOR ' OHNIR NAME ,. TAXPAYER Hi . NAME/ADDR 4- ^ riOV- PROP AOOR t ONNCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR I ** ♦ • •r vV so 20-117-2S 21 OOOS 02*70 mpotooor ave MARIA LUISA lUECR MARIA LUISA LUECK 2*70 0UM4000Y AVE MAYZATA MN 55S*1SO 20-117-2S 21 0020 02S20 0UW4000Y AVEGALE MILL SALE MILL 2520 0UM4OOOY AV MAYZATA 553*1 21 002* OY AVE SO 20-117-23 02500 OUNHO J A 6 NAFU3 JOHN A NAFUS 2500 0UM40O0Y AVE MAYZATA Ml 553*1 SO 20-117-23 21 0032 02505 OUM4000Y AVE ERNEST C OLANCHARO ETAL ERNEST C BLANCHARD 2505 OimXXrY AVE MAYZATA MN 553*1 30 20-117-23 22 001* 02*05 OUM4000Y AVE M P HICKEY A 0 6 HICKEY M P HICKEY A G A Hicm 2*05 OUMIOOOY AVE MAYZATA M4 553*1 I’ ,,•< ■ #• SO 20-117-23 21 OWJS 02*00 OUMIOOOY AVE 0 G HORAN A T A NEFOT DAVID G HORAN A TRACY MENDT 2*00 OUMOOOY AVE MAYZATA Ml 553<150 20-117-25 2100030 AOOSESS UNASSIGNES lAHRENCE T • eNOERSON LAMRENCE T KNDERSON 2*** OUNNOOOY AVE MAYZATA Ml 553*1SO 20-117-23 21 0021 025*0 OUTAKXIOY AVE KNUTE J NOPSARO ETAL KNUTE J NORGARC 25*0 OUNNOOOY AVE MAYZATA Ml 555*1 SO 20-117-25 21 0030 025*5 OUNNOOOY AVE M A HULTGREN ADM IRJITGREN MILLIAH HULTGREN 25*5 0UM4OODY AVE MAYZATA M4 553*1 SO 20-117-23 22 001* 02*75 OUMIOOOY AVE J A A S L POHERS OAVIO 0 A VICKI R VICKERMAH 2*25 LYDIARO CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 36 20-117-25 22 0017 02505 OUMIOOOY AVE JAMES S NOROLIE ET AL JAMES S NOROLIE 2505 OUMKXlOY AVE MAYZATA Ml 555*1 110 REPORT HO. PZ*35*01page s59 20-117-25 21 000*02*7* OUNNOOOY AVE AUDREY 0 OGLANO AISREY 6 OGLANO 2*7* OUMRXMV AVE MAYZATA Ml 553*1 ‘ 159 Z0-117-2S 21 001*02500 OUHCOOV AVE TIMOTHY J OGLANO TIMOTHY J OGLANO 2500 OUMRXIOY AVE MAYZATA Ml 553*130 20-117-23 21 0025025*0 OUMIOOOY AVE M A KAATZ ANA KAATZ MICHAEL A A NAN A KAATZ 25*0 OUMOOOY AVE S MAYZATA MN 553*1 * * • • f 56 20-117-2S 21 0031 025*5 OUMIOOOY AVE M L 6IELKE ACM BIELK6 MAPREN L/CHRISTINC H OlELKI 25*5 OUNNOOOY AVE MAYZATA Ml 553*1 4 t • • '^a’* • 30 20-117-23 2Z 0015 02*77 OUMOOOY AVt J A I S L POHERS MILLIAH P A 6E0R6ETTA HICKEY 2*77 OUMOOOY AVE MAYZATA MN 55391 P • 38 20-117-23 22 0018 02525 OUMOOOY AVE J H LEAR A 8 L LEAR JAMES H LcAR 2525 OUMOOOY AVE MAYZATA Ml 553*1 t •• ^ * • ■r »'APi ,V ’ A .A•• #♦ ^ 4* •♦ • # • *’ • ‘ k , *“ V ‘ ‘ . R *■V*4 « > ■ r 0 • M *•J ii .*■> G ■ ■* F- • f * P ■ t ,j-i * 5 . i • ■ ^ ^ • • f ’ s- •' • 1 • 4 . V I i . • 11 i. Ill • \ —* . >; RUN DATE 0e/e$/94 BATCH 005 HENNEPIN COUNTY PPOPERTY INfOWATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OM^RS LIST • PROP ADOR "i (RflER NAME . TA>Q»AYER lip NAHB/ADOR •i : 'F • *= * r; Jf0, -• 1! V' ' • V ^ R • 4 ■ a'' . . “"I* '«•, 1 *. nf li -■•. • *■ •f •ij- *♦ ’»- > * •. Sa 20-117-25 2A 0056 02601 CASCO POINT RD BRUCE J NEDBlOH ET At BRUCE J HEDBIOH AM) CAROL J CLINE-MEOBLOM 2601 CASCO POINT RO HAYZATA MN 55591 TOTAL BATCR 005 00019 ■ • '•'Si'.’;.- ■ ■ f -i ’!u r 4 . .* Ui 'M• • ' i.• ‘A»>* • r V . A t , • ■ *.'V * . • • '* *’ ■■..V ‘•. * • B’y, h\1 f' ♦ •'■:■• '■ ' •■ . V b*» Jb • • - A B * • *f ■'S«|T -V •* <i ■ . ■ -i i % i-% ^1?* ^4-^ REPORT NO. PIA55601 PAGE 6 . f 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION# TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE*UiSOi:^ • .♦ * * A » T’ s T • F Fi ^ t > • i • .t ’ - ^ ’• ■:; r'i. . V. ■ 1 • I * w * N * .* * E > :i V I ■ 1 > ■LV| > . • y i. ^ i I . • • » •: :/■ :.' > i; ' • >1- Uy . <c V -t ■•>1 •* J ■■••, *v ; .. |»'■♦..IF '*♦'<“ : '.‘t-'. ,' iK ; V** » s • T'l >:» ■:■• ,1 !S; yni ■-I*' ■,■• .'f ' ■■' * .* » i »• r» ' > - I •t. I ■ i .'’’ .V ^ . ’ #*4 ..♦‘'-♦'it ■ *'i;' '■■ • .-*• -'iV ‘ K* \*.f f ^ . . F ■< . *i J »« V- K ’.'A' 4.* c % ^ <)fu^yu,jy -5)|T)-J ?/•> vy .•• / !* .V . /' o'-''.'•/ -vW // y',// y/v// \rf/ V v''*i '' ' <v •• P Q, fiAt.lfff CO CK WlO0Ci>'^ T^(?. V-^ m gustafson design, inc. AmM. 6MWV^»MS«7 BtaS44*«U Lear Residence 2525 Dunwoody Ave. Orono, MN Scale; 1 Inch •> 16 feat Ai«iit26.1994 # 17/ II f. Vm ■“ ■''' f i Orro G •cT'Wtw C V.# ». ^l t V'v* •'f i^nn t C jO* I %icwp\ ^ 9rCtr^. G k*V>n«.til ^ Sfc-s^ V C Mowbjftr ^ jrf''''ic«l a Go»ann Pf Mr*T t 9«*VM} \4 *- L'jwJ C ^j'VkMa P? matter C t^vir* * • jprr\ ♦ •OUtOD*' »l ♦ •^ar«or T taucmrvt ><j ft fe<3 ^f ^ Vftlpnor ^ ^ Oor>«(d C fiSj^iidl Tt»om« A F^.i^x J Sw*«0ft) S-^XP' Af t\^'^ M A i C ^ T*v»n#t W %w»icr Mk ^ww* C 4.pni** ^£ l.r^ # VIMHO •«^% r Af Vcm ^ Afijjnp^ Af ftrnnrr* a ftmirv'T* AAjfft ■ Ml At ftAan A Af Gjrv W Mon^ Af A^ J G^vxwi A I A D^n** J tjgp»TL«r Af A tXft k?vn«a At AP^iip J Af ftftjrft O Af 9 rf t (AfHAft> At i U,*****^ Af G^, I? A' ’AcAO Af f '»jjdC Af vx?* i VAuo ‘'S J •€ D Guswocw' « Owtp* Af Ajc* G 'Hip^JP* Af jonr A Go*aA» Af CAvmn A txftfon M AjuwV^- ►%,rVjr M A. ^ :.• •’* S.% A .r - 1 Z ^'•StP C '.‘ ^ ' ■ _ - - .4^ ifi Bonestroo MLm Rosene ^!jSm Anderlik& T\ 1 Associates Engineers & Architects September 9, 1994 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron. f\sst. Building and Zoning Adminictrator City of Orono Post Office B<n t>b Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 Re; Lear Residence File No 139-1965 Dear Mike. Wc have rc\acM>,ed the proptisal to replace existing retaining walls and riprap along the shoreline of Spring Park Bay on the Lear residence at 2525 Dunwvx>dy Avenue. The information submitted is incomplete and unacceptable. The City should not continue a review of this application until a plan hits been prepared by a Registered Engineer. Informatic>n which is critical lor this type ot project includes; - type of w'all proposed - method of providing drainage h^r walls - method of tie-hack restraint for w'all geotechnical evaluation and.br type of till proposed - cross section of propt>scd wall and side slopes - loading condition used tor wall design - indication as to which of the existing trees will be saved - description of the construction technique proposed for working around the mature trees and root systems in the area Wc would recommend a mi^dular mastmrv bliKk wall be used tor the improvements. There are many manufacturers which provide an engineered wall system for almost any application. The wall should have a draintile line installed to function properly in clay soils. . - , We do not recommend gravity tvpe retaining walls, such as boulder walls, due to the ditticulty in determining their effectiveness o*r durability. Wc do not recommend timber retaining walls as a permanent solution. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIAIES. INC. Shawn D. Gustafs^^n, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 \nfiif I existing elevation proposed elevation gustafson dgssgn, inc. 1M4WlfCon«inA^Ha OoWw»Vii«t.ttNlS42T T«ln>ho«: (•1J)M4-421I Lsar iR93lisnD& £525 Orono, MN Dunw.:*cdy Ava. Scale: 1 1nch = 10 feet September 15,1994 X r Cros9 becticns cff Wjlle Grades Lear ReaWence 2525 Duni¥tx)dy Ave. scale 1 inch = 16 feet Gtmi Qrav« 029 6OHW 329 nap Start! ::Mr X r ✓ r / . \ X \ \ \ \ \ xxxxxxxxx vxxxxxxxxxxx X xxxxxxxxxxxxx fyyyyyyy^yy/yyy* xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx yyyy*yyyyyyyyyy» xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx y^yyyyyyyyyyy^^9 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *^***^*********» r Section 1 934 »• f X X X X y y y 0 XXX ✓ / / # XXX y y y y X X X X y y y y . X X X X X X—» X X X X X yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 92960HW 928 Rip Rap Starts 03(X2 yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy0‘ ^Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx —*. yy/yyyyyyyyyyyyy ______X X X X X X X X X X X X —:—:—J Section 3 Typical Wall Section \ T- / gustafson design Inc. September 16,1994 Mr. Mike Gaffron Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323*0066 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Attached are the supplemental materials needed for the Lear variance, t have worked out the requested details of the wall and drainage system for the proposed project. I have faxed copies of the wall detail to Shawn Gustafson for verificatic.i. Thank you for your help with this request. end. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley. MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 II n iiiirtlr’rT*—^ gustafson design Inc. jIHkUt ^ ~ t ~----- September 16,1994 Mr. Shawn Gustafson, P.E. Bonestroo Rosene Anderiik & Associates 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul. MN 55113 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Attached are the supplemental materials needed for the Lear variance. I have worked out the requested details of the wall and drainage system for the proposed project I have delivered copies of the wall detail to the city of Orono and I have mailed hard copies to your office. Thank you for your help with this request. Dale A. Gustafson end. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 /S TO:Chainnan Schrocder and Planning Commission Memhnfrs Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: September 16. 1994 SELECT; #1966 Douglas Olson, 2601 West Lafayette Road - Variance - Public Hearing ADoUcation: Request for hardcover and lakeshore setback variances for replacement of existmg retaining walls and construction of a spa in the 0-75’ lakeshore setback zone. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Letter to Staff 9/16/94 E - 1 fitter to City Engineer 9'16/94 F - City Engineer’s Comments 9/8/94 G - 1991 Survey (Update in Progress) 11 - Hard Surface Plan (Before) I ' Hard Surface Plan (Alter) j . Typical Brick Wall Section K - fop^)graphy Discussion Arolicant is Gustafson Desiitn on behalf of Douglas Olson. Applicants propose to the house. ~viJX z.. percentages are only approximate. . n 7S- hinlrover is iust over 1%. The proposed revisions in the poolApplicant indicates e.xisting 0-75 h J reduction to just under area and reduction of walkways tn t^ ^contlrnted until the sursey is 7%. Final hardcover numbers and percentage received. this writing, staff has not received his tmal comments. Zoning File #1966 September 16. 1994 Page 2 Items for Discussion Is the proposed reduction in the 0-75’ zone from 2.795 s.f. to 2.636 s.f. (a reduction of 159 s.f.) appropriate? Is the proptised spa an amenity that can be approved in the conte.xt of existing development in this area of 0-75’ zone? Because applicant filed a conditional use f^nnit for the retaining walls and then included the spa in the project which requires a hardcover and setback variance, applicant has not provided a statement of hardship in regards to the hardcover and setback variance. Applicant should be requested to provide a statement describing undo hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with the zoning code requirement, in relation to the spa proposal. Does Planning Commission liave any concerns regarding replacement of the south retaining wall? These walls are expected to be limited m 2.5’ in height and accommodate the pwl elevations rather than provide signiticant support to the lakeshore banks. Options for Action 1.Recommend approval as proposed, subject to the hardcover revisions noted, subject to receipt of the updated survev confirming hardcover numbers and percentages (and setbacks) which must be found acceptable to staff before this item will be presented to Council. Table, based on incomplete information or for other reason. 3. Recommend denial (state reasons). Other. cm' OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTV' LOCATION A £kcr^____ Tvp>c of Application to be Filed C^^\^<ccri^y\___________________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ’ 2^1 liT Z3 Z.\ OQO^ APPLICANT Phone (home) .<^K\ JUIi^_______ Phone (woA) Aue /Vo City ^Y^iclri\ Cyhfl/ir^ /^0£] OW'NER (if different than ,%'^Iicant) N ame ^ ---- Address (n C^^^Y< vnv *^ Tfc « <" Phone (home) 9^3 ______ Phone (^X)rk) ^2J) ^ City Zip natePropertvAcquired 1 (s» . —--------------------- I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CON'DITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application $125.00 Residential Accessory Use $200.00 Instimtional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use X $200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplam _____ Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____ $100.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After*the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee (month/year) .■TTv -r fZ-nijn UA t r VI iA^ .MWW limU i ■ V) V i k.vv,v ihtCK Jl 200.; •iiLti.'''T~‘,'H2os you ^V' - -V- Ji i V'i.* .' tLV OTHER APPLICATIONS ______$200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ______$250.00 Vacation ______$175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement V^acation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____ $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present 2k)ning District 0^I j , Present Use of Property Y\ Resident! ^ 1 c Other (specify) r 4. 5. 6. 7. hit list from S4a-S271). It for iurv«y ey. long Involve RBQUXKKD SUBMTTTAI-S ]. Cofspleied Appllcatioa Form. 2! Deicrtbe request In detail. 31 ~ Certifled ProperQ^ Ownan Uit of ouxen ('f’ Heooepia Couot^ Deputment of FlDADce, ^ Pitt Mip. Cenifleatf or survey (itgnad by i llceose Infonnttion. Atucb leg il daicrIpUoa to ipplictiloo if i Topognphlc lurvey (exlfUsg end propo cbtmes In elevation (grtdei). Uft of Ibe legal namei (Include mariui tatus) of idl pertoos with an imartst In the property. Thli would Include named) of appllcantci) ir not current owcer(«). Conitruedon plan, If applicable (see fttff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, plena attach a separate lUt of any other ptriuns you wish notified of this application. YOU AKE REQUIRSD TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES LAKOS DOCUMENTS OR QW FOR REPRODUCTION (U” X 17 ” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all dccumsntf. plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Pleaae remember that your application li not complete if the above Information has not been Included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Appllciilon li complete, Inldali of Clerical Staff; _______________m ' '—1 9. 10. ^^applSml hoSS^lgm^ provide all InfonnaUon required or request^ by the Zoning AdmlnJtotor, ageees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fw payment) and/or unusual expenses Incurred In review of this spyllcatlon, and certifies that the Information supplied is true and eoim« to the tAit_of hla/lter l^p'^ledge Applicam'i signature Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ ^ j w,The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this ippUcatlon and further aut^rixed reasonable entry onto the prtmerty by City staff, consulianti. agents, commission mcmbsri, ind Council members for puipoiei of lu^itieation sndUtcriflcsiion of this request, Owner's signature Date A»U«. «.t h.« .Jl nbmIM. to. & aw .»"» M Ceanliiloa Mwlni, in h.M «. tb. AM Moa^y »f uuM™ JmS, idud^'^lu. of Uui cliau|« pderio Um aieeiiaf* ' \ -fl V I •} f • \ KUN OATf WBATCH 002BliOP AOOH CM€H MAME TAKPAYIII NAHC/ADOHi.\raop AOOR OHNER NAME TAXPAYEK NAME/AOOII 5« tl-117-15 21 000102A04 NEST LAFAYETTE RO LAURA C RIOSKE LAURA C RIOSKE 2A0A NEST LAFAYETTE RO EXCELSIM FM 55S31 MEF#«R1N county RROPEATY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY t»R«R5 LIST50 21-117-25 21 000202AO0 NEST LAFAYETTE ArM MATTMEHS ANN HATTMCMS 2*00 NEST LAFAYETTE RO EXCELSIOR W 55551SO 21-117-25 21 0007 02405 NEST LAFAYETTE RO BRADFORD L BLANKENSHIP BRADFORD a DEBRA BLANKENSNIP 2405 NEST LAFAYETTE RO EXCELSIOR >04 55551 50 21-117-25 21 000402410 MAPLERIOGE LA GREGORY 0 GCRARO GREGORY 0 GERARD 2410 MAPLERIOGE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55551 REPORT NO. PI455401 PA(X 558 21-117-25 21 000502401 NEST LAFAYETTE RO STEPHEN M RITCHIE STEPHEN M RITCHIE 2401 NIST LAFAYETTE RO EXCELSIOR >t4 5555158 21-117-25 21 001002407 NEST LAFAYETTE RO C J BOOENSTAB a P J NICHOLS C J BOOENSTAB a P J NICHOLS 2407 N LAFAYETTE ROAD EXTELSIOR rti 55551V. DROP AOOR - OMNCR NA>« •> TA19AYER .. NAHE/AODR•4 50 21-117-25 24 004502410 NEST LAFAYETTE RO J L HAF40EL a P J MANOEL JAMES L HANDEL 2410 HEST LAFAYETTE RO EXCELSIOR >04 55551 58 21-117-25 24 004402450 HEST LAFAYETTE RO THOMAS R LOME ETAL THOMAS R LONE 2450 H LAFAYETTE RO EXCELSIOR >91 55551 58 21-117-25 24 004702455 NEST LAFAYETTE RO A J a N L STAMY ALIEN J STAMY 2455 MEST LAFAYETTE RO EXCELSIOR >04 55551 » 11 •J* PROP AOOR . OMNCR NAHC TAXPAYER .. NAm/ADDR 58 21-117-25 24 004B 02455 HEST LAFAYETTE RO H HAC CREGOR LYHAN LYMAN LUMBER 500 NORSE AVC EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 21-117-25 24 0048 02415 NEST LAFAYETTE RO VICTORIA L GAGNE VICTORIA L GAGNE * 2415 LAFAYETTE RO H EXCELSIOR MN 55551 58 21-117-25 24 0050 02450 F1APLER10GE LA BARBARA K AROFIS BARBARA K AROIS 2450 MAPLERIOGE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55551 • • -r-': * 4. , . . a . r Jk ^' .1^. ' - %BHOP AOM OmEH NAME TAXPAYER . NAME/AOOR A.. TOTAL BATCH 002 00012 . f »f gustafson design Inc ';>4 September 16,1994 Mr. Mike Gaffron Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Attached are the supplemental materials needed for the Olson variance. The official hard surface areas are also being calculated by a registered surveyor and will be ready next week. It is my hope you will accept my numbers with the understanding that they will be confirmed by the surveyor. In our attempt to reduce the area and size of any structures on the lake side of this home, we are limiting the walls to under three feet in height. We intend to replace the crumbling lannon stone with small narrow brick walls that will have a smaller footprint. I have faxed copies of the wall detail to Shawn Gustafson for verification. Thank you for your help with this request inc^rely. ^ A. Gustafson end. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 P gustafson design Inc £ y ® A > September 16.1994 Mr. Shawn Gustafson. P.E. Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul. MN 55113 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Attached are the supplemental materials needed for the Olson variance. I have worked out the requested details of the wadi and drainage system for the proposed project. I have delivered copies of the wall detail to the city of Orono and I have mailed hard copies to your office. Thank you for your help with this request. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544^4215 m M Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates 3 tcr«r^roo ^ A •€ • C ^ Vjrv#» ^ kJ»v«* »f *f *■ «C f •€ • c x^* i. k*Vjn«»^ Vj «»'m c C x^su*jni Engin^rs A Architects September 8. 1994 A »c«p» M O •! C ^ kf M^« ^ •Hjrwsr ^ %Ar*jr» ’ •AAm«nn >0 » ^*siJ ^ ■ Ar^tfP^wr A : A OOOAKl C MM*dl T>tomM A ^1 flIMPnC J n fvnjpi Maftrm FI A CFVmrs M Ang Wb ^■"■un ^ 'VAl*W C ^ C Af F A^'tdpmvv Ff AW% « A?#v Af %l«m A Ff Cji«rv a vionm Ff Faui J GAr«xm A ! A P^WP* i f.jgpAon Af A Ali k*vn»Jt Ff ‘»'A|3 J Ff VUrA D A»i»V Ff VAiP^ • Ff OUWA Ff L A««Apn Ff D I'-vcAtf Ff > 'xw «vtir» Ff # »a0p pf jDu(AP» -' •»•«< •* D OwkiAor Ff C «A AC OF^^F* Ff Fim» 3 *^jef Ff JOfW F OoiOF' Ff C^09% A iXAHLV^ L#e M FMMPAinr Mjryr M Oho^ J*r«^ f f ri»jpF%JA* r Mr. Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bav. Minnesota 55323 Re; Olson Residence File No. 139-1966 Dear Mike, We have reviewed the information submitted for the proposed retaining wall replacement on the OLscn residence at 2601 West Lafayette Road. Our inspection seemed to indicate that the proposed walls would be less than 4 feet tall. We have no significant concerns in regards to engineering matters However, the tipplicant should provide additional information as follows; a plan indicating the location and height of the proposed walls - the tvpe of wall proposed and details for the design We would recommend a modular masonry block wall be used for the improvements. ITiere are many manufacturers which provide an engineered wall system for almost any application. The wall should have a draintile line installed to function properly in clay soils. V\'e do not recommend graviw hpe retaining walls, such as boulder walls, due to the difficulty in determining their effectiveness or durability W.' Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC Shawn D. Gustafson, P E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 ✓ ? <•8888888885 * «r -i? -C.AKDSLilSFACE AFTER iVA To:Chjimian Schr.>edcr and Orono Planning Commission Ntcmbers Ron Mwrse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator September 15, 19^4 #1%8 KeiUi and Vivian Bangert. 3500 Bayside Road - Variances - Public Hearing From: Date: Subject: ADplication: Request for variances for lot area, lot width. 0-75’ hardcover, and grading and tree removal in the 0-75’ lakeshore setback zone for construction ot a driveway and a single family residence on this vacant , arcel. Zoning District: LR-IA. Single Family Lakeshore Residential. Two Acre Minimum Lot Size List of Exhibits A • Application B - Plat Map C - Propeny Owners’ List D - Survey E - Proposed Driveway Plan F - Cross Section G - Letter of Request H - City Engineer ’s Comments I - Alternate Plans Considered and Rejected by Applicant J - Hardcover Calculations K - Letter from Hennepin County Department o! Public Works L. - Access tv') Pertinent Code Sections/ Variances Requested 1 Section 10 23 Subd. 6 (B) - In LR-IA district, required lot width is 200’ (existtng 165’), minimum required lot area is 2.0 acres le.xisting lot area is 1.97 acres). 2 Section 10 Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (U - No hardcover is uUowed in the 045™ ~ setback kone (proposed 0-75’ hardcover is just under 40%. all due to added driveway). 3. Section 10.56, Shoreland Management; A Subd 16 (G). vSteep Slopes - Applicant must provide adequate infomation to allow evaluation of possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility frorn public waters prior m permit issuance. When detemiined necessary, permits shall be conditioned upon erosion prevention and preservation ol existing vegetation Leninrof structures, vehicles and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leal-on vegetation. Zoning File #1968 September 15, 1994 Page 2 B. C. Subd. 16 (I), Vegetation Alterations - Prohibits removal of live trees in 0-75 /one v^ith a diameter of 6" or greater without City approval; requires equivalent number of replacement trees be planted; prohibits intensive vegetation clearing w ithin 0-75’ zone and on steep slopes (proposed grading to construct driveway has a significant potential for removal of the majority of vegetation in the 0-75’ zone). Subd. 16 (J), Topographic A Iterations/Grading and Filling - Grading and tilling standards for construction of driveways in the 0-75’ setback zone (see code sections attached). D. Subd. 16 (K), Stormwater Management - Requires adequate runoff controls. 4 Section 10.03, Subd. 6 (A) (2), E.xisting lot of record in "R" district of greater than one acre and served by public sanitary sewer - Such lots may be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes if the Council finds: A. It is at least one acre in size and the average width ot the lot is at least 100 . B. It is served by public sanitary' sewer. C. It otherwise meets the requirement of the zoning chapter. Background Tliis vacant lot has been in single separate ownership for at least 20 years. The Bangerts are intending to purchase it as a new building site from the previous owners, the Larsons. The lot was assessed for and provided with municipal sewer as part of the Snibbs Bay project. There currently is a very steep and poorly developed driveway cut at the west end of the property, but this driveway is too steep for residential use. Further, it is located at the w«t side of the lot where sicht distance for entering Bayside Road is e.xtiemely limited. Hennepin County DOT has indicated they will only approve a driveway location in the easterly 75 ot the lot. This presents a major problem in that a steep bank rises approximately 15 ’ above the road at a 60% slope for almost the entire length of the lot. To develop a driveway in the easterly 75 will require significant earth removals in the 0-75’ zone and result in the removal ot a number of mature treL. WTiat appears currently as a wooded slope will have significantly less vegetation as view'ed from the lake. Both suifr and Citv Encineer agree with the applicant that their proposed plan will have a less intense visual impact th'an the two proposals they rejected, which would r^ a driveway virtually straight up the hill and require major cuts into the slope lor distance 100 hack from the road. Zoning File #1968 September 15, 1994 Pai!e 3 The DNR has been notified of the application and as of this writing has not submitted comments. Potential for Alternate .Access Locations Staff has discussed with a number of potential buyers of this property the possibility of gaining access from adjacent properties rather than developing a new driveway on the steep roadside slope. Perhaps the most likely alternative would be a shared driveway with property to the west. However, staff is unaware whether the Bangert’s have approached neighln^ring property owners regarding tte possibility of such an access easement, and are led to believe the Banuerts would like to avoid a shared driveway. Issues for Discussion Absent the access is.sue, is there sufficient hardship for granting the lot area and width variances? If variances were not granted, how would this property be used.^ Should variances be granted for hardcover, tree removal and extensive grading in the 0- 75’ setback zone? From a "visual impact" standpoint, if the driveway is constructed, what specific plantings will be added to soften the impact of the retaining walls and remaining steep slopes? The City Engineer ’s letter clearly shows great concern about the safety of this driveway and its impact on neichboriiig propenies and the road, as well as slope stability concerns. Please review his comments. If the driveway proposal is approved, a revised plan addressing all the Engineer ’s concerns should be submitted by applicant and approved by the City Engineer before this is presented to the City Council. If Planning Commission concludes that the negative impacts of this proposed driveway outweieh the justifications given for granting the necessary vanances. what other options does the property owner have? Is Planning Commission interested in wit^olding approval until property owner or applicant have explored all other options? Is Planning Commission convinced that all other possibilities have been exhauste . Please review the applicant’s letter of request caretully Option.s for Action 1.Recommend approval subject to the applican, providing a revised plan addressing the issues of concent noted in City Engineer Glenn Cook s letter of September 14, 199 . r Zoning File #1%8 September 15. 1994 Paee 4 3. 4. Further conditions should include a.Provide a detailed plan showing which trees will be removed in the 0-75 ’ zone and on the steep slopes, and how and where replacement trees and vegetation will be added. b. Property owner to obtain a driveway access permit from Hennepin County. Table for additional information. Depending on Planning Commission’s intent, this might include: Tabling until applicant explores alternative access locations through neighboring properties. Table until a revised plan is submitted for Planning Commission review' addressing the City Engineer ’s concerns. Other. Recommend denial, finding that the requested variances are not supported by sufficient hardship or justification. Other. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee 5200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $200 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION p Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ---.ill -•\l£ :s"Iu ___. V A S-. .nr'V''i L*^tl -4 r» VL 0^) !*tV 'Aa Vi. ^S~//Prooertv laenuiicauon v» /----r —------------------—----------- Attach lecal description to application if not included onrequired Date Pro^ny Acguued, ^-------- dr..s— I (do) i(3b1iml>l50 own the adjacent parcels ot land PresenhiT^operty: ___residential ____other (spectfy) 7a^ Zoninu District:______________________________________________ _(month./year) applicant Name -KtiTh *■ Address: / X? __ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name______________________ Phone (home) rvy-o>^y Phone(work) yyf-z^/9 Citv:Z\p:_S£££^___ Phone(homc) Phone (work)_ Address:Citv:Zip: Estimated Construction Cost Sdescription OF REQUEST --------------- -----— Describe request in detail: ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARLANCES REQUIRED ;qc Lot Area x.< Lot Width Setback:Front Side )OQC Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Other (specify) Average Lakeshore compliiince with Zoning Code recjuirenients. (attach additional sheets if necessary) required submittals ^ ,1 • 5r,fnmntion must be «»bmitted bv anpUcation (IrnHlinc dqte In ijiisLAllofthefoUo^ingiqfonpaUonJ^^'^^^ fnr vntir COIffpjgm 1. <• 6. 7. 3. 9. Completed Acpiicaaon Form . . this Ur. from Cw.vitic- * .wt-— . pirnrr- A-^O^, Govi Center. !)• */HeiEcpui Ccuctv- Deraroreni oi Fuucc.. a ooj. Plat Map 'obatzed „r.-=vot) and ntclud-- hardcover S'“ca"L to aJdidon. prcvtdc one (1) copy 31-.' X ir tor ^^^pM^arvey (exiatinp )t^" are proposed one (U cop/S-' x ID. Sketches or plans or floor iL eL an .n^.j-est m me List of the bpal no. enrren. owr.ens), applicatton. please arach a separate Ust of any odter persor. veu wish notified of dus apoheanoa. Additional items as may he requested by *t> ^ • _ t^ic -trtniicnrion Please remember that vQur The Applicant and ^bP=-;^' infagaalioDjlia n"» been Include^ variance application is nor cornp»g»^^ n._------------ APPLICANT'S SIGNATTRE i„ronna.ion reautred or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees to provtd. ^ payment) Administmtor. agrees ib J ' v f oft^s app^^^ certifies that die information supplied is tiue and correct to the best ot lus/n js- Acpiicanfs Signature JJM2 ■' f '' ^Cryv,-/7 OWNER’S SIGNATLUE ^ „ ,hi, acoucauon and further authorizes reasonable The owner hereby acknowledges . a'.ents Commission members, and Council entry onto the property by City Stan. ^ «,u=st. members for purposes of invesngauon and ve^canon .t ^ J Owner’s Sigmmre .^;^:£^ZJ^iada7±2^:==- ^ W Applicant must have all submicals too the Momlar^ «ch month. Meeting. Planning ‘^bmcussion Meeting meetings of the Planning Commission AppUcanls must be present at sch j5i,„juied meeiina, please make anang^eno and Council. If an appUcani is Building & Zoning Ofnee of to lave an authorized agent acead in >our pUcc This change prior to tbs meetiog. 8 • 4 • • s• K ^ (CHSISTINE »• %« 9 {:4) i j »"ik ’’ •T ^ •* I f " ( ts) S nr» ••••*• m ( »5 si5' -•£! A ,»Ih d * c\ iTT! "i. 5 *{t\f-- 1 250 1 •00 V (5) >r^ (n); M • ^ i/4 m • (I?) ? ^ ' (23) '? SI 5^ ** 5 (JO)S> « i ’? S( ' *? r' (?9>Pk •P a' s« V ’’ 2 j - «(??} / *Si* 9SStS W Ai H 5,(25) • j l?S.?S -MlL-fc-f NO- '‘(29) (y» j'li li 9 9 •25-i! ^ \ ’» • R \ IT (<2) • R II . (41) • F!•5 (^0) • R 14 K (■59)® 3 ft« juV* J/ 91 '^ 3(<o « 221*55 5,^ .- c> cunoT 8 (46) t»jA yx ^K-6. le •?l ; 3D ; JO ; 50 : ® : ” ; » :c9):(M)k4o)'(36);<33):(32) • • H ^ I* * ■251 9 »• •RUN OATC M/ZV9R•ATCN oesADOSTAXRAVIR■NAMi/AOOR•3.'.' i MOR AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER. * NAME/AOOSJtPROP AOOIIf f TAXPAYEiV. , NAME/AOM-4' n * nr. V mop AOM ^ CMCK NAHE , TAXPAYER HAHi/AOm M'' 5« OS-117-2S 15 0004 00050 AOORfSS UNASSICNEO e L CUSTAFSON ETAL CERAIO I CUSTAFSON ZOO OEOCMOOe DR lONC LAKE m S555454 05-117-25 15 OOlS00058 ADDRESS ItUS^lCNEO V N LARSON ETAL VINCENT M LARSON 1025 COLFAX AVE S MPLS »0< 5540550 05-117-25 15 0021 00050 ADDRESS tMA«£I9Cw V N LARjaM ETAL VlNCENt M LARSON 1025 COLFAX AVE S MPLS »« 55405 50 05-117-25 15 0044 00222 OEOERNOOO OR JEFFREY 0 MUELLER JEFFREY 0 MUELLER 222 BEOERHOOO OR LONB LAKE M4 55554 gCftCPlN county property INFORNATIOM SYSTEMproperty ohcrs list54 05-117-25 15 900500050 ADDRESS UNASSICNEO O L GUSTAFSON ETAL GERALD L CUSTAFSON 200 DCOCRMOOO OR LONB LAKE F9I 5555458 05-117-25 15 001405510 8AVSIDE RO C R MORRISON A J P MORRISON CLINTON M A JOOY P MORRISON 5510 DAYSIDE RO LONB LAKE MN 5555458 05-117-25 15 004105540 DAYSIDE RC J M I J R DARTLETT JEFFREY A JO A»«B DARTLETT 5540 OAYSIDE ROAD LONB LAKE FM 55354 #4'; M'-r. .•# ^ V Tl , • * ' • • • ic . totax oatcm 005 00010 REPORT NO. P14S5401 PACE 1450 05-117-25 IS 001405470 DAYSIDE RO HATTMCM f MANLEY HATTHCM E MANLEY 5R70 DAYSIDE RO LONC LAKE m 555545« 05-117-21 IS 801705540 OAYSIDE ROAID OALGAAROALVIN T/DEATRICl M DALCAARO5540 OAYSIDE ROLONB LAKE MN 5555458 85-117-25 15 004500050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MATTMEH E HANLEY MATTHEH E HANLEY 5470 DAYSIDE RO LONB LAKE MN 55554 ■.n.4 . ^ 4.' . ■ }> ’• • 1 _ 4JK V i- • ’ -f* J I CWTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION Of INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT Of PROPERTY TAXATJON, TO THE DEST Of MY RNOHLEOCE AND DELIEf/ yfl- J J /1/1 ^\m« JiPji MiOilxJOAT #1 ^0^ o •p' •• $ . V, * (!» I /* "• « i • * P 4 *.‘d ' ' 4 ♦ ■ . . i * I » ,4 * F 4 ii.*'. •.-v'fF; i •> «» ««■ f «r /9 f *<«r «# « ‘ •'* ' • '#< ••' ;• I »/IL I I I U 1 I I #10 '''.w w © r7 •«f«9 1 r^Ki4« ( ■••< ^ mutf f •mmmm (ita «• *4 *« cyrs^r^'iir •T9I <« CT^^i^fCAff OI» *0« SHIRLEY LARSON m TMf «C i/« OP StCTiO<« f • ««t-t9 Mf COupi Tt Mm«tfSO^* f ar"^a»’U«Ai&a l««l liS.Zy *t»l a* t ■•«! 199 *4 f«*( of < H«t »«rt 0t I hf 0««rt«r «f 9«cli«A ). t«wii«Ai» 11/ N«MI«. /] •««! «f %<•» ii*ite4 «f the *««ftfi«rlv lkf«« «f taftlM ••4# 4n« «0^l44riw 4l t ^4 A«rt44r|r ^44* |« Mid il4rt*i444l 8«4'l4f 41a«. 1441 44't •< 1 H« f4tl I4t /I f44« tf I *»t • •at fOd 44 *••« ««4d l4Cli4« \ 44iCll il«« •4«l(h«ri, 9! 44«ll«r|4 M9M*4t ««v Itn* •/ tjvtta# tMtf and n»#t4«rlr 4l 1 aka ni^italont# •lota tocAMoa of tHo lack •< dioanattAt •• tHo olot of dud i«i «•. WJ. and d4C4w4t !H4 wndarlrlnf ittai dtacf lot ia«>o ^ra a«t totclflc tt •irocUdA. Ida addwd la«4l d4a«riallaa tKawa oHai IM a«n«r noMUtr a«na. Th aa dlMartni adatracta oara aiaatnad ailHMi 4 tlaaa odlatidd !• a^adla# THara<art aoaa iraa af judicial aracaadinfa #44 ^ ia«k.irad !• Ur»ir a«i4dlAad ddonpariaa »Hia tvrvaa intanda ta add* IM Mandartaa a« i»># abova daacfidad arapaM» M d*aa n«t a«ra«rt ta aba« a«^. aiHar taaravaaania ar a*»c ' aac noant a , a Iran rto'kar •aarinfa an»«i* ara baaad «»a« an aaauaaa daioa lOaoH a« at ^t an »a a • • a •' C%9tHilhip( Lnxithx r^. jjmi Stmnn^. S/fr PLmner^ 4K2 Tjmjfdci A\<nw • LnuR UUr. MN 5S336 *7 “ ' 612^141 I ..w. tKji iH*. ••• pnf M, J n* *•, .« Wfok* »t« Jtfrtt 'Ofn • jndiru’ »*a»aj»n nv*** I •» 4 I and land t»nd.« lib Uo» .4 iHi n«*«» *4 .tjK ^ { ».air%«^ \|oM»^4J 1 atW'* \a«nN < />r^ i>«ra — a*. \(i ?J J.r C«1< ~)0' »( •S4tepit.-,-«’-''»^ '•' K 0.L>' 6riot>iMC> >fJ o-^s' i 15 cuy Dirf F<-^ "■yoP Of 'Zo' (^oCf- -50 '^^ • ^lOlfJC^ lO Kt>o£. It 7l' i» lc>0’ oti. f-jVo St'-I'f IJ f^'4 f- < /O-IZ'/.') ‘t>iRT tv-'Wy' /’•• ■ i-r jt. ^2>*/-^ I? «i .1 u i O. .*^o G^C/^z^') riJbrx S^-rZ^ t_ f>i>.» •■ i^- ]£>^ L)l£.tJML- t irOti»r>u- ^ - ' A PROJECT SUMMARY • • 3500 8AYSI0E ROAD Site Characteristics: The subject property is a heavity wooded plateau located on the north shore of Stubbs Bay oriented generally North and South A small but steep bartf^ rises from Bayside Road approximately 15' in a horizontal distance of 30* and then rises gradually to a knoll that is generally agreed upon to be the primary building pad at an elevation approximately 24* above the road at a horizontal distance of 160* The lot then follows a rolling contour through mature trees to its northern line Variances Required Five variances are required for project approval Lot width variance from 200 ’ to the existing 165’ should present no problem as well as a lot area variance The site per attached survey is 1.97 acres at a minimum ( Currently, some confusion exists over the exact boundaries of the lot Resolution of these disputes can only add to the area of the site.) Problems arise because the only access to this lot is through the 75* setback from the waters edge This requires variances for hardcover, tree removal and grading in the 0'-75* setback. Further complicating the Issue of access is the requirement from Hennepin County that any access to the site be made in the easterly 70* of the lot to provide adequate site lines on the curved road That forces the access through the steepest part of the bank Several scenarios have been explored to provide access to the building pad and evaluated as to their impact on the site contour, trees and vegetation, the amount of soil that needs to be removed, the drainage of surface water in the 0'-75' setback area and the visual impact from the lake We have also considered the safety and serviceabilty of the driveway for the occupants of the home to be built on the site Calling the access problem difficult is an understatement - it is a monster. » # ^ 1 —.1 Tf -L - Any generally straight-line solution in the required area results in destruction of all trees and vegetation in nearly 20% of the lot surface A cut through the bank and contour slope averaging 14* to 18 ’ in depth over a horizontal distance of approximately 140’ is necessary Amounts of soil removed for these scenarios range from 1360 CY to 1700 CY in the O'-75' zone only The driveways for these routes average 15% to 16% grade over their entire length, steep by anyone's definition All surface run-off in the affected area drains to the driveway and heads unimpeded out of the narrow driveway chute directly across the road and into the lake This is roughly the same Ime that a skidding automobile would follow on a frozen driveway surface once downward travel on the steep grade began with no bail-out position. Proposal The solution we propose is a driveway that enters at the eastern edge of the site addressing the concern for sitelines on Bayside Road, but then turns generally to the West and traverses the bank With a gradual 8% straight-line driveway that approaches the natural contour as it approaches the West line A relief postion ( nearly flat) occurs at this point allowing the driver to turn North and again ascend even more gradually ( 6% grade ) to the rear of the building pad This second leg follows very nearly the natural contour requiring minimal revision of the existing surface. The benefits of this solution are found in every area of concern. This plan calls for the least soil removal and site revision of the available courses of action Cuts in the bank average 10 in depth as the driveway crosses the lot requiring the removal of approximately 900 CY Retaining walls would be installed on the uphill side of the drive as it traverses the bank Only the minimum number of trees would be lost and the existing vegetation would only be disturbed in the area of the cut and to allow for construction of the retaining walls The downhill side of the bank would be protected and left undisturbed as much as possible. The surface water run-off would be allowed to drain much as it does now Water traveling down the West leg of the driveway would able to leave the drive and travel down the bank approximately 50' before reaching the road Only water moving down the traversing slope would exit directly onto the road. I The perception of the bank and the site remain virtually unchanged by this plan The undisturbed downhill side of the drive combined with the mature trees remaining on the uphill side maintain the "wild bluff" impression from the water Much of the driveway is actually concealed from view by the lower bank There is no sweeping valley to reveal the homesite in the distance Finally, the issues of safety and serviceability. The steepness of the driveway as designed will be manageable most of the time and challenging in the inclement wreather but not nearly as difficult to deal with as a 15% grade under the same conditions This plan has the additional benefit of a two stage descent allowing the driver an opportunity to slow down and reassess the conditions It also limits the possibility of an automobile spilling uncontrolled into the street if things do go awry. Conclusion: We hope you will grant the variances necessary to provide access to this site The access problems are extremely difficult but the building site can be terrific. We believe we are submitting the best plan for the access to this site and we hope after your thoughful consideration you will agree 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Andefllk& |\j| Associates ingfnt9ri $> Areh/tfcti Ibjp^ Arct^u ^ i Cisjo^fuvy Ow« C JW nn* W •Ci#'^ ><?*»?•' C •• M#^ t •! r.f-^ •{ G*** • Cjc * •! f VQ)«i *S fp»i C ir*w^c^« M ff*r^ C PA •Sr- tr September 14, 1994 4 W'BbfB •# »m fk CLr«y rf t *ef*^ rff O txtawj •! C 4 • • .r-y 4 Soc’tsor Pf Men 4 /-#'**C“ •? >«f f • f S Pf •^r'-W • 4 Ourp«t C Pf •*“r-*w 4 v/«0 P? »—ip«'.- <, Ikvraa^ *f 9^^ •• M«-#r- • I#- P| M 4^ 4 C » T-c-'je ^ •rirw'* P| y*K-s09 C .»-v** P? t V*4«4ry3 •! jr^ O 4p»*#i€r r? km . 4^^ •£ M««4 • trW »? V*f* 4 \io •£ Gjey SAC^ P| riu i 4 4 C a ' 4 ^ P| 4 4\* *f p-^ J Cpi^* V*1 ? JtVi Pt V,ti t .r-«- Pf . G P| . vb-r^'v PI C4^ G Pf •er-' t Pf GsJiPt i ir*#! P* 0 G«AM*W4. pi Crt •« C^P' P* Pew* 6 4#,4* P| 9 Pf C*>e* w 4 I'xujr IM M 4Mi««iv Wit »4 M 0»%T4 ,^9\ • tr^Ti^ City of Orono P.O Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Attention: Mike Gaffroo Re: 139-1968 3500 Bayside Road Dear Mike: We have reviewed the application for constructing the home at 3500 Bayside Road. The property owner has provided three options for constructing the driveway access. The site topography makes it very difficult to get driveway access from Bayside Road (Co. Rd. 84). The driveway access plan preferred by the owner is not good but appears to be the best option. We would recommend th« the following i«ueJ be nddreued prior to proceeding with construction: 1. Drainage a) Driveway should be curbed « • • d -j b) Culvert'other drainage structures to prevent water from flowing into Bayside Road. 2. Retaining Wall a) Must be designed and approved by Reg engineer if over 4 feet high. 3. Guard rail/restraining Wall a) Protection should be provided at driveway corner on West side of lot. 4. Headlight Control a) Screening provided along east lot line to prevent headUght conflict with westbound traffic. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MINI 55113 • 612-636-4600 City of Orono Pag^ 2 Septembir 14, 1994 Re: 3500 Bayside Road 5. Slope Stabilization'erosion Control *) The bink area diinipted by construction need to be stabiliied, silt fence should be provided along Bayside Road. 6. Check turning radi on driveway to insure access by moving and construction vehicles. The property owner will be required to obtain a driveway access permit from Hennepin County. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE A.NDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Cleon R. Cook GRC:lk m. St5^, »fO DOS Kfi tntrt^^ TO • 5% PIC7 C-lFf 6^u>p«^»50*/*^ ^S®in«!A/tU'r-/M n® P-gfcvt-OF |(.C>' Oft. l-j7# (’(5<tM'v»-- 35(DO 'JSWOM T»C^rt .1 If/. A-. i-oo-n K'^T,AIV» /O-llV'O V'.i''-*’ 01 ix'i •'■T 33>V*^ ^„mc^vaS(os>: fccei^-^ ot |S 6oinc.'to Re* >/''x c j/.'" \. 931.7 • */'?/ -^'3\o '1']^’;/>'■ (»+* I kSdr't •«'•.* ' ffJ 0'^S fe'sV tlO/ OlF<- . 35"00 ^^^sa^G: iSzAb VlftA/C-VlT-//g TO Kf^ ^sJ?2.7' /►> /go' 0^ p% 5U>t*e: Tot^rr u |G‘/* A" ^ JPc ^TjA/u * IO-\zV»^ T>l^^-'^ X>^h^ c( i>»»J t'^r 32>VO ---------------------------^..^tif i rr.' t cli^ HARDCOV'ER calclxation worksheet ^ / / / SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)^ 0-75 75*250’25-500’500^1000' EXISTING IIABDCOVI R IN ZOMi A. Hou^ ____________ Lcf:2Tfi B. Garage C. Driveway X X S.F. S F. D. Sidewalic X X S.F. S.F. E. Paiio/Dcck X X S.F. S.F. F. La..J. • ;« IL..1 r., n. c X X .X S.F. S F. S F. s r »v.'4A> l^.vKL'^.Gv i ;v iN IION'F. 1 L 1 ’• »i . < i . ki* I’.<i t ■ ».rli c_*>. 4 s r X iro P.__r»/« i u. A. ,, -V- • 9 ,V» .... -i---------S F. L . L WrJiiJ X X A S.F. S.F. S.F. ] 0 S F ' D. 2sr s r S.r 0 t. k .-U .\ S F S.l £. P.aio.’DiCk ^3*5 X X xs'5 S !•. S.F. I ..iid.H a,)c 'Jn«lwtl..in By f!x>ttc X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Oihet S.F TOT.'\l. ll.VRDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A yvtr + B __3 W /*/H 37/y S.F S F, X 100 3>.C % 13 % A B liARDCO\™ CALCULATION WORKSHEET / / SETBACK ZONE; (CEtCLF. ONE) 0-75 / /EXTSTINr, MARDCOMT^ EN ZONE A. House __________*1 5«»-IOOO*> ^ * • r) A 1 X X S.F. S.F. S F. B. Curage C. Drivewsy S.F. X X S.F. S.F. O. Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E. Paiia/Dcc'ii X X S F. S.F. F. La^d'.cap'^ I rd-ip.in r v X X X XI m rt S.F. S F. s.r. C. Oilu't __i r lOTM I.'.ASDCOVFK IN ZONE TOT 'L PMOFliRfY .\FU'A l.N ZO." E S.F S F X 100 r* ,Q UL*} Cill :X. iIAillilillllli IL A. HjU'C __________S.F. r .-nj, h X \ X m ss cs 3S0O S.F. F.O S F. U 4j M'l.C • L-* i I C • • S.F. zo /40 \ X /C/tm (7^^^ 40 a B /0C 5vr" f e»o S.F. S F. D SiJ .A S F S F E. Putio/Djck X X S.F. S.F. F. Euidscapc Ur.djrlujii B; Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other 'jo / TOIAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A *7. />3T + B . S.F. S.F. X 100 2^ S.F. ZV.9 A n A B SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 ’ tLUlDCOVTR CU-CULATION WORKSHEET 75-250’ (^''^^50^3 ^1000 ’ EXISTLNG H yRDCPyTR IN ZQM A. House______________ X X X -7 .1 ---:T —E—. ^ s.F. B. Gtfage C. Driveway X X D. Si«lewalL X X E. Pario/Deck__X X r. Laailicapc l/iVcilaii} r.y runic X X X G. O.hiT TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL niOPERTY AREA IN ZONE ____ + B YArco X 1(X) (»i harcxntvtu in /one A. Hou..c ______________ Lcr.giii Wiant X X X B. Ga.-'jjs C. I'iivcway X X D. S.UL.voIk X X E. Patio'Deck X X F. Landscape Underiain By I’lasiic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ______ + B /S'OC Y/ . ^cO X 100 y.3 S P. S.F, , S F. S.F. S F. S F. S.F. S F. S F. S F. S F. S F. c r; W4 1 • S.F. S F. S.F. % S.F. ___________S.F. ___________S.F. S.F. S F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S F. S.F. S.F. S F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B A B r / / il\rdco \tr calculation worksheet r SETBACK Za\E; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 75-:50’ 25-500’ FMSTLNG H ARDCOVTR IN ZONE A. House B. Carafe C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck X X X - 1 ^ jr ,^SF. / F. LjiuLcji c ____ Ur.Ji.rl.ii:i ____ Dy P?r,!ic ____ X X X X X X X X X G. Other S.F. S.F. S.F. l: A TOT.M. M.ArDCOVr.R IN ZONE lOTAI rROi’l.KlY AREA IN ZO.NE A ________________ - Q . fiArinrovFK rv zoni ; l!.«asc _________* S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.P. S F. £ r. S.F. S.F. S F. X IC'l .V V/.UJ1 X X X fi. Gji.'ijw U. tjlvlc % al «« E. Patio/Dcck F. L.JiJiwJpc L'ndcrlaut Dv Plastic C. Other X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONF A ® . 3tJf A li X 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S F. S F. S.F. S F. S F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A S.F. B 7c r H e nn e pin;^ County . MitUV ■tai.' -• August 1994 Brad Fisher 1865 West Wayzata Blvd. Long Lake, MN 553^ Re: Access tobsoo Bayside Ro^Site (CSAH 84) Brad As we discussed, the only acceptable ^Due^to'^the^terrain and^roadway site is within 75' of the east A^d nVallly (CSAH) 84 is alignment, visibility on this ^®9"'ent of y guaranteed, Hennepin CountyESS,«..... line. Tf and when construction becomes imminent, please remember to have a permit ljp?ied for To aSSress such details as approach geometries, drainage, etc. Thanks for the timely inquiry and please call with any further questions. Sincerely, David K. Zetterstrom Entrance Permit Coordinator c:Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono REC5!.V"'“ OKZ/saa AUG 5 1994 ^ 6 • * V..... o‘ :’ub'4'- 'Vv/rks Rfcw jZO Washington Avenue South Hopkins. Minnesota 55343*8468 (612)930*2500 F.AX;(612)930 2513 V.\\s«»« •\wr\\\* V-<5r^*'* •‘r^r^'V ^L ' •Xr >• •-JrWr'f'. .V:'^-'^^V?i\y-vklL/AM/iA V. ' ^W/-i\\\v / '/^wnnP^AT^foSS'^’V'TfeS , Ai^LMV»\Ck»^ iceuv OAi j,..^j6,w(nC» (>ft*Pr«iOv \iV.V!&•KT:'''«22rr'^ ■ /^', .^^jBi^p i|^^'\ ' J m* • mf •r.rrr * ^ X r' 1 X MV •) •%# \f)l • m I wt t / N. >v. \. /^, 3N V. J L K • ^ "W til I Lr^ i_j \ >M M* * J-.\ ••» 1 k(?T*V f »« } a !\ •«s.r ■ tM • j r / \ *01‘C • » •f *I14. - —♦1.♦ • *T-t • U . — ♦ i e^z • • <\5i' I^so t,^o (\^ ^y^* av6» Slxr6 f*o^ 'T^C' *tc> A fO(wT" 2,-s'Atevd' IS 6 y.cu ^ 30*4,,. ^ Jit) !to l*^ hcoi f wo \2x> 1 - ^ A \ I h.€,LoiEF 7=* If(biwT IS %2.*1 PI?....3SS LM^ ^____( S jAi . ZjS^JS^ # -f^e^U!<^- 5L cP b 'P^'^ Poy/Jr 2S -t- A’iDi/g iJ^ --4S 'So JC oX (S.^Gr/i.Tt--e. T ......... u ir^-EfkcEi '1 30*/° 6T -- .1 r V- . \ i xi ;■>/ a, riennepin County X. An L;ua I Oppoiturarv hTipicveg j ime>F>ouf«r^, CvHjntyAJmirustrur*'! Septeraber 16, 1SS4 Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning \ Zoning Administrator* City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-CC66 C5AH°84^ north sid^between Stubbs Bay Rd and Tonka Ave Section 5, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat Mo. 2180 Review and Recomnenoaticns Dear Hr. Gaffron: and make the following comments: . No additional right of «y is raquired by Kannepin County at this time. • The proposed access location, approximately 20 feet for access information and entrance permit forms. . All other proposed construction Within county right of^^way rogoires^an__ approved Hennepin 1 and utility construction, This includes, but is not United ” ,, p “ ..j section at 930-trail cevelopnent and landscaping. Contact ou. Pemits section 2550 for utility permit forms. . The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way, disturbed during constructicn. Department of Public Works _ 320 Washington Aveituc South^ Kopkins, Minnesota 55343-0465 ^ i^n£. (612) 930-267C 930-2513 TDD:(0C) 9oC--6u6 fvrQrL-J PuN Michael P. Gaffron September 16, 1934 Page 2 Please direct any response to Doug Mattson. Sincerely, o.A Thomas D. Johnson, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ/OBM ^ i'] TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Mwrse. City Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning ik Zi'nirg .Administrator DATE:September 12, 1994 SUBJECT- ^1969 City of Orono, 1355 Brown Road South - Variance Public Hearing Requested Tabling This application is for variances for construction of a parkii.g lot f<'r the Crystal Bay Office. The Ci:y Administrator has requested the item be tabled until the October meeting while plans for the parking lot are further developed. ; ;