Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
r' I TO: FROM: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: August 9, 1994 SUBJECT: #1957 Jacci J. Segner, 3286/3290 Navarre Une - Subdivision of a Lol Line Rearrangement, Class I - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.25. Subd. 6 (B) - LR-IC Lot Standards Section 11.03, Definition 66 (A) - Class 1 Subdivision ^"°"li!bl”/it ieqE w^i'°strving three or more residential units List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Gustafson Report E - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement F - Format for Class 1 Lot Line Rearrangements G - Water As-Built H - Sewer As-Built 1 - Staff Letter 4/26/94 Mf'^te"tofA«esses to Subject Properties and Adjacent Properties L - Survey Description of Application The puntose of the lot line rearrangement is to create two residential lots that meet both area and Width requirement of the LR-IC Zoning District as follows: A. Area required = 21,780 s.t. or .5 acre Lot A + C = .5 acre Lot B -t- D = .5 acre B Lot width required = 100’ Lot A -H C = 100’ Lot B D = 135’ Zoning File #1957 August 9, 1994 Page 2 The subdivision results in two conforming lots. The major issue for the review of this subdivision is the issue of access to the two new building sites via Hillside Place an unimproved platted right-of-way at 25’. Keview Exhibit K, the unimproved right-of-way currently serves 3300 Navarre Lane as the primary access to the propeny and as a secondary access for 2260 Bayview Place. If roadway is to remain as a driveway based on the criteria set forth in Section 11.33, Subd. 4 of the subdivision regulation, total number of users of this roadwav must be limited to two. Review Exhibits I and J, the applicant’s realtor and potential buyer of Lots B and D were notified earlier this year of the requirements of the code regarding the use of Hillside Place as a private driveway. The applicant who resides at 2260 Bayview Place and who owns the residence at 3300 Navarre Lane has agreed to eliminate the use of both accesses at Hillside Place. Review Exhibit L. the survey of 2260 Bayview Place, reveals adequate area for Ms. Segner to achieve access to the lower level garage within the existing rear yard. Upon your site inspection, note the location of the detached garage at 3300 Navarre Lane. There is adequate siting distance for the relocation of an access drive to this property but it will be necessary to trim back on the existing vegetation to provide safe access at the intersection. It would also be beneficial for Ms. Segner to trim back on the landscaping adjacent to Hillside Place to improve siting at that intersection. Refer Exhibit D, Gustafson recommends two options concerning access to the property. He recommends that either the existing driveways be relocated or to upgrade 25’ Hillside Place to a minimum 24’ paved roadway serving the four units. Given the limited right-of-way and the known desire of the applicant, staff would recommend that we agree to allow the applicant to relocate accesses as noted above. Ms. Segner must first contact the Public Works Director prior to installing new driveway at 3300 Navarre Lane. As for 2260 Bayview Place, the engineer recommends fencing or landscaping. Staff members advised of a need to provide not only fencing but berming as fencing can always be removed. Applicant may also have the option of planting trees behind the fencing as another means of providing permanent barrier. The property has been assessed for sewer and two stubs have been provided at Lots 45 and 47, refer to Exhibit H. Municipal water is not available to the site and applicant is given the option of either extending municipal water or installing on-site wells. It is staffs understanding that both applicant and applicant’s prospective buyers would prefer to install on-site wells. Refer to Exhibit H. municipal water is located at the intersection of Hillside Place and Navarre Lane. There is nothing in the Orono code that requires a connection to municipal water when the lines are not immediately adjacent to the properties to be served. Per the current Orono fee schedule the future owners will be responsible for payment of $225 per unit charge for each sewer connection in addition to an $800 SAC fee (1994 fee schedule) to be paid to the MWCC. r Zoning File #1957 August 9, 1994 Page 3 Staff Recomincndation located at 3.86/3^ Na ^ oic two J^dential units. This approval is subjrot to the following condttions: 1. r. ^rrrv.te «hall iiot bc issucd fof iicw construction for the properties tocated*at^'’86/3290 Navarre Lane until the primaiy access to 3300 Navarre 1^^ seco^ access to 2260 Bayview Place at Hillside Place are removed.ST= wish to add the need for the installation of fencing. The granting of drainage and utility easements lO’ along exterior lot lines and 5’ at each side of shared lot line. 3.Upon application for a building permit for new be^esp^mible for payment of «25 rewer SAC payment of $800 (based on 1994 fee schedule) to the MWC . The applicant has advised that all visitors to this site must not drive on the roadway if it is wet because of the condition of the roadbed. i j r 3r-?r Pt! JtMi Si ^ “ ^itib J Rl „ W *3 *1 e N* Ml- gj* 3AV ** “SsH r*; Rl*^ 'J R ri*Hi 5« J^JS J ij«i ^ «k'giu J n "^ e •r*rr3rn rntr R “ 1 r t«i3 "Sm^1 * R« R TUT 1 jifsi nK R 2U a; fi O c *ici ^ a «5 ^R o ■niTa 1 rjB Wl ^1 IR V 1^ N R K» a 2:;i’W'S J ncT a • 1 ft ^R ^'r ?^r PWH s xr > TIP R • U r ‘•-'"vR■ml a* aW R R r^. BXI IF’''’'5'‘»S >tfl » ‘.•‘'va ‘.^v«•ax-'• 1 r* gfsH S R • iPiS^R SI""puna>! A ^ P -5 iR . iti 3 ?'?5l W S N S «R'*'o ^ 'i'" "8 fl h ^sB «s«l R TIP £ R B2 r’^vB *.~Sa rL ^s*«»'oif •* ^ • • • K sf 2? ^ R C fifi XI K Li I I 1 PI a Ti Pi » TJ f .* P ' J \ • S • » « • *• Pi ON TA N . • < ■ i >•••'•. •. . •• P«C * ow< TAP NA 1 ••• »^ • ^ A • »•.» '! ■ * t ; PIMM •» ■ ♦ •; . . . . . . ' MM DATE 07/05/M OATCH 001 SO 17-117-2S M 0022 PROP ADDR 03405 CRYSTAL BAY RO ^ OltCR NAME . ALOMA J DARLING . TAXPAYER ALOMA J DARLING NAME/AOOR 3405 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD HAYZATA m 55591 HErtCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 44 0025 02205 BAYVIEN PL CLEMENT r BIRCH JR ET AL CLEMENT F BIRCH JR AND BARBARA J SIPPRELL-BIRCH 2205 BAYVIEH PL HAYZATA m 55391 REPORT NO. PX435401 PAGE 2 38 17-117-23 44 0024 02215 BAYVIEH PL RAJ HAZARD ROOERT RAYMOND HAZARD 2215 BAYVILH PL HAYZATA MN 55591 • PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AODR OMCR NAm TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR . .i * PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR . ^ PRfll 'v (MCX name TAXPAYER > .NAME/AOOR ■ r 38 17-117-23 44 0027 02225 BAYVIEH PL ROBERT A E8ERLE A WIFE TERESA KOCH 2225 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-25 44 0050 02265 BAYVIEH PL OAVIO H DEAN A 01AI4E M DEAN DAVID H A DIANE M DEAN 2265 BAmEH PLACE HAYZATA htl 55391 30 17-117-23 44 0033 02305 BAYVIEH PL R N STELLXN6 ETAL GENE H BLOCK 2305 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55391 3B 17-117-23 44 0041 02250 BAYVIEN PL CATHY JO TURNER TOM A CATHY TURNER 5537 BARTLETT BLVD HOUND m 55344 SB 17-117-23 44 0045 00030 A00RES8 UNASSXGNEO C N PALMER A B J PALMER CHRIS A BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RO ORONO.Ifl 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0028 02245 8AYVIEH PL T J A T P HALLOCK TERRY J HALLOCK TIFFINY POOL HALLOCK 2245 BAYVIEH PL HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0031 02275 BAYVIEH PL JAMES R Ar40ERS0N JAMES R ANDERSON 2275 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55391 36 17-117-23 44 0039 02240 BAYVIEH PL JACOUCLYNN J ZONTELLZ ET AL JACCZ SEGNER 2240 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55391 36 17-117-23 44 0042 02240 BAYVIEH PL KIMBERLY A ERICSON KIMBERLY A ERICSON 2240 BAYVIEH PL NAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0044 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C H /ALMER A B J PALMER CHRIS I BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RO ORONO rtl 55391 •V * ■ • > I. * ^ ' ‘X — ' f.'v’II . . p- • , .• * * / • ^* ** • * *•• * f .; *RUN BATE 07/05/94 ^ _ ' BATCH 001 PROP AODR QMCR NAME TAXPAYER . NAME/AOOR •,r -\ .V- s' PROP AOOR CPtCR NAME . TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR 0»MER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 58 17-117-23 44 0046 00036 ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO JACGUELYTtl J ZONTELLZ JACCX SEGNER 2240 BAYVIEH PLACE NAYZATA m 55391 36 17*117-23 44 0062 02200 BAYVIEH PL DALE NATSON ETAL DALE MATSON ETAL 2200 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55391 36 17-117-23 44 0096 03300 NAVARRE LA JACQUELYNN J SEGNER JACGUELYNN J SEGNER 2240 BAYVIEH PL HAYZATA m 55391 HEI6IEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOTMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Olt4ERS LIST 36 17-117-23 44 0057 02215 KENNOOO NAY C T ROOD A L 0 ROOO CLAIR ROOO 2215 KEM<000 HAY HAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0063 02230 BAYVIEH PL J L SCHNECK I P M SCHNECR J L A P M SCHNECK 2230 BAYVIEN PL S HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0103 02260 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYNN J ZONTELLI ET AL JACCl SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEH PL HAYZATA MN 55391 36 17-117-23 44 0105 PROP AOOR 03280 NAVARRE U OltlER NAME CUXR T A LYNN 0 ROOO * * TAXPAYER . CLAIR A LYftl ROOO , NAME/AOOR 2215 KEMKXX) HAY • • • NAYZATA m 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00044 1 . 38 17-117-23 44 0029 02253 BAYVIEH PL PATRICIA A BURr4EICE PATRICIA A BURNIECE 2253 BAYVIEH PL HAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0032 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO GENE AND SHERYLL BLOCK GENE AND SHERYLL BLOCK 2305 BAYVIEH PLACE HAYZATA MN 55391 SB 17-117-23 44 0040 02260 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYNN J ZONTELLI ET AL JACCl SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEN PLACE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-25 44 0044 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C H PALMER A B J PALMER CHRIS A BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RO ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0047 0003S ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO C H PALMER I B J PALMER CHRIS A BARBARA PALMER 2710 CASCO PT RO ORONO m 55391 '»•• ■.•,.n , •i J ‘ > ' ' 'r' 'Sfs 'X : A/i i! -r- ■.Mi i; - ■.> • . *•:,» V ‘\v I •X .V- REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE S y = 58 17-117-23 44 0058 03220 NAVARRE LA RICHARD A PROUOFXT • ROBERT J RITCHIE 1901 BEACH U HAYZATA m 55391 38 17-117-23 44 OOH 02300 BAYVIEH PL JACQUELYftl J ZONTELU ET AL DANIEL J SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEN PLACE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0104 03240 NAVARRE LA CLAIR T I LYfM 0 ROOO CLAIR A LYNN ROOO 2215 KENNOOO NAY HAYZATA m 55391 > * ••• r ■* • *i J f *1 4 '.V A*'' <4i ' ■ i’’’ 1* s'!" ‘ V'/r ' -V v ’- M ■ ■ - W--: xm , • . ■ '»* • ■ S' . 'I « # ^ ■I > 1' X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEWEPIN COUNTY DEPART OP MY KNOHLEOGE AND BELIEF.oy DATE i’.* ■* •. : t t t 0-'.‘.•a S ' • *• . ' • * r• r* : » V ' . ‘ * ■ , ■ 7. . ^ ‘ ‘ i . »■ ■ •>: V. , ! .* '.f > t * • ; I* . i. ’ ’• ► ’ 1 * ■. .it t V. : V V; NMI1 JJ~ i "h" j.. i V .c_) !'■ ••■_c_ / / Certificate of Survey & Lot Line Rearrangement for Jacci Scgner in Lots 44,45,46 & 47, 'WALLACE’S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH Hennepin County, Minnesota w L y Existing Legal Description Lots 44,45,46 and 47, "WALLACE’S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH’’. Proposed Legal Descriptions "• " A. Those parts of Lots 44 and 45, "WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH’’ ® line and its extensions; said line being drawn from a point on the Northeastely line of said lots distant 100.00 feet southeasterly from the most North- ® ^ point on the Sou’thwesterlly line of said Lot 45 distant //5.00 feet southeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 44. B. Those parts of Lots 44,45,46 and 47, "WALLACE’S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH' extensions; said line being drawn from a point on the ortheasterly line of said lots distant 100.00 feet southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot 44 to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 45 distant //6.00 * feet southeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 44. This survey shows the boundaries*of the above described property. It dees not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. •: Iron marker found o: Iron marker set Bearings shown are based on an assumed datum. CoiTiN & Gronbikg, Inc.I hereby cerlify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of the Slate of Minncsoti. Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 DATE ret/. SCALE /"rro" lOBNO. 1^55^1 X < • • •;..:> *i^ ’' * . .• r t -'. • .v'r^ *, : i I <* .'. '* V a.«♦ • i Iw *\ I j- . •• ■; 1. "'•7* ;• ■ ,'. '■ ■ ■■ »''* # ♦ r ; ^ ■ r ..i‘' C80 a M90CK^.W Itovns. »i*peL so*va<<. Pfe p« • Caet. Pt T»%aPM I Noifti Pf iMfP Q scptoPtrn Pt Uu^ M for^. C P-A •Sf- r C3*HLU»n Bonestroo Roscne AnderlikA Associates CnginMrs 4 Architect! August 8, 1994 Ms. Jeanjie A. Mtbustb, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Ciystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Jacci Segner Lot Rearrangement File No. 139-1957 mm A SOW'. Pt«D0«nt P%%ht PI rchM w ^aai. Pt OMO tfsam Pf mom C iMm A !A A Bau«BP. PI Mam A m»wi Pf Mcp«r r. PMhifvi. Pf 1t04 Pf yhQ<*Mi f AfMMfiaA, A lA OdAM C luiQifQr. Pt rtfomn A p| PTOTf 4 SlIPBef^ Pf. tfmaK Pf M«eAja' * fiu Pf Afrvi M rnr^ AiC P T^orPil VU P|MUhift C l#Ach Pf 4amM t maim PfJppy o P| kOR i Ai^invik P| fytrtri P AriHrMT. pf m»t t M H Mam A.1P4 Pf Orp W Mihr\ Pf PiMd CarvMA AJA OiA« 1 itffiW. Pf. A 4<a knmgL Pi PfMP i Caawri PC Mar* VMt PC MMS i Pf UPHCfiCiMia. PC I PfCary e PfP ^ t«af. Pf MPB Pf Oou^ J Braa. Pf 9ha^ ^ Ckma^aA Pi Ceim Pf PiM a MMt PS John P QaiMc P C CAMS A tnOSO« M M Pf»imfPf MarMnM CW iampt P ChfRAM • V^- > ‘"t,- . t * f » V .<1^ J , 1 •V; • -V. /• Ai:;. V :r f. / \•'M. Tt • %• Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed lot line rearrangement prepared for Jacci Segner in Lots 44, 45, 46, and 47, Wallace ’s Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach. The rearrangement is acceptable, however there is an access issue that need to be addressed. The two proposed lots, as well as two existing homes, use Hillside Place (a gravel driveway) as their access to Navane Lane. The City Code allows only two lota to be served on a single driveway. Three or more Ipts will require a private street be constructed for proper access. The City Code requires a 24-foot wide minimum paved width for a private street. The street should be constructed as part of the lot rearrangement. As an option, the two existing homes could eliminate all access points out to Hillside Place. This would require that a new driveway be constructed out to Navarre Lane for the southerly lot, as well as landscaping or fencing across the driveway of the northerly lot. Drainage and utility easements will be required 5 feet wide along all lot lines and 10 feet wide along Hillside Place and the railroad right-of-ways. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. '*r a- i7?” r-' c. -y y Certificate of Survey & Lot Line Rearrangement for Jacci Segner in Lots 44,45,46 6 47, "WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA DEACII" Hennepin County, Minnesota L y Existing Legal Description Lots 44,45,46 and 47, "WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH". Proposed Legal Descriptions A. Those parts of Lots 44 and 45, "WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH" which lie northerly of a line and its extensions; said line being drawn from a point on the Northeastely line of said lots distant 100.00 feet southeasterly from the most North erly corner of said Lot 44 to a point on the Southwesterlly line of said Lot 45 distant //iJ.OO feet southeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 44. B. Those parts of Lots 44,45,46 and 47, "WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH* which lie southerly of a line and its extensions; said line being drawn from a point on the Northeasterly lino of said lots distant 100.00 feet southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot 44 to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 45 distant //4.00 'feet southeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 44. This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property. It does not purport to show any other improvements •: Iron marker found o: Iron marker set CoiTiN & Gronbirc, Inc. r encroachments. assumed datum. tt % 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Sur\'cyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE r-/V-9V SCALE /"sfo' Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 JOB NO. NMI1 JJ~ i "h" j.. i V .c_) !'■ ••■_c_ / / Certificate of Survey & Lot Line Rearrangement for Jacci Scgner in Lots 44,45,46 & 47, 'WALLACE’S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH Hennepin County, Minnesota w L y Existing Legal Description Lots 44,45,46 and 47, "WALLACE’S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH’’. Proposed Legal Descriptions "• " A. Those parts of Lots 44 and 45, "WALLACE'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH’’ ® line and its extensions; said line being drawn from a point on the Northeastely line of said lots distant 100.00 feet southeasterly from the most North- ® ^ point on the Sou’thwesterlly line of said Lot 45 distant //5.00 feet southeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 44. B. Those parts of Lots 44,45,46 and 47, "WALLACE’S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE OF MINNETONKA BEACH' extensions; said line being drawn from a point on the ortheasterly line of said lots distant 100.00 feet southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot 44 to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 45 distant //6.00 * feet southeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 44. This survey shows the boundaries*of the above described property. It dees not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. •: Iron marker found o: Iron marker set Bearings shown are based on an assumed datum. CoiTiN & Gronbikg, Inc.I hereby cerlify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of the Slate of Minncsoti. Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 DATE ret/. SCALE /"rro" lOBNO. A/ INNF.TONKA BEACH" rom a point on the most North- Lot 45 distant F MINNETONKA BEACH" rom a point on the e most Northerly distant //«.00 3t purport to crDATE ier «;r'AjLc__.___________________ r 2^6.0 CITYof ORONO •■mf Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parirway Orono. MN 55355 Mailini Address: P 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay. V.N 55323 0065 April 26, 1994 Mr. Bob Marinos c/o Rod MacCharles ReMax A-1 Excellence Realty 2477 Shadywood Road Orono, Minnesota 55331 Re: Lots 44-46, "Wallace ’s Addition to Minnetonka Beach Dear Mr. Marinos: I have been asked by Mr. MacCharles to provide a letter confirming that the City would issue a building permit for the above referenced property. The City wUl issue a building permit for a single family residence if all City requireme *ts are met. Those recjuirements include, but may not be limited to, the following: 1.Provide confirmation from Hennepin County that Lots 45-46*47 have been legally combined for tax purposes. Provide confirmation from a certified surveyor that the combined lots meet the minimum lot area standard of 0.50 acre, and minimum lot width as measured at the 30* front setback line of at least 100’. 3.Access is to be by private driveway within the planed right-of-way of Hillside Place. Public Works Director John Gerhardson has confirmed that he will issue a driveway construction permit. This approval is expressly conditioned on the level of use of said driveway to no more than two residential users. Therefore, before a building permit will be issued for your property, at least one of the two e.xisting users of Hillside Place must discontinue their use of the Hillside Place right-of-way for access. The minimum physical changes required to constitute "discontinuation" of the driveway use include: A. Regrading to re-establish any shoulder and swale at the property line, and B. Creation of a berm or permanent fence just inside the property line; and Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 ii r Mr. Bob Marinos April 26, 1994 Page 2 C. Property owner of 3300 Navarre Lanc/2260 Bayview Place (Segner) must sign acknowledgement that Hillside Place cannot be used for driveway purposes, and any re-establishment or use of said driveway approach shall be considered a violation of Sections 6.05 and 6.06 ot the Municipal Code and punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.Of course, issuance of a building permit would be conditioned on meeting all building requirements (setbacks, hardcover, building height limits, etc.) and paying the appropriate fees and connection charges. I have reviewed the above with Public Works Director John Gerhardson and Building & Zonm^ this letter is not intended to comment on the buildability of the remaimng Lot 44. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 473-7357. Sincerely, /Hf- Michael P. Gaffton Asst. Planning & Zoning Admimstrator MPG/ch cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director CITY of ORONO Municipal OfTices Street Address: 2^50 Kelley Parkway Crono. WN 55355 Mailiof Address: P.O. Box £5 Crystal Bay. MN 55322 CC65 March 22, 1994 Rod MacCharles Remax A-1 Excellence Realty 2477 Shadywood Road Orono, MN 55331 Re: Lots 44-47, "Wallace ’s Addition to Minnetonka Beach Dear Mr. MacCharles; In addition to the letter to Del Wasser in 1988, the enclosed lener of July 17. 1990 to Cunis Palmer defines the City codes and policies regarding development of these lots. Please be aware of the following points; 1.Assuming you wish to proceed with making two equal area building sites out of the four lots as you have suggested, a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement would be in order. An alternative (although not a panicularly good alternative, in my opinion) would be to simply combine Lots 46 and 47, combine Lots 44 and 45 and then make a variance application for substandard lot area of Lots 46-47. The lot line rearrangement probably makes more sense from the standpomt of creating more attractive lots. Two sewer stubs have been provided, in Lots 45 and 47. The property was assessed for sewer in 1965. 3.Citv water would have to come from Navarre Lane (or possibly from Bayview Place) at your expense. Please contact Public Works Director John Gerhardson co^ecu°on p^^iTfor ^Vb'JSd^g lftris”r93f Dlus $19 30 per front foot. This would total approximately $8,400 for both lots. TTie City Fee Schedule indicates that "if an improvement is required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessmem". The "assessment- referred to would only be imposed if the City extends the water Imes as a City project. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Rod ^^acCharIes March 22, 1994 Page 2 4.Access to both lots could be via a private driveway constructed within Hillside Place, conditioned on the properties at 3300 Navarre Lane and Place absolutely eliminating their current access to and use of Hillsi^ Flace. City code allows no more than two budding sites to share a driveway. The third user triegers the need to upgrade the driveway to a road st^ard. Again, plc^ contact John Gerhardson regarding a permit for constructmg a dnveway withm Hillside Place. I am enclosing a subdivision application form for your use. Both John Gerhardson and I may be reached at 473-7357 if you have additional questions. Sincerely, ^ P. GaffmaMichael P. Gafffoa Assistant Building & Zoning Administrator MPG/lsv cc:John Gerhardson, Public Works Director ^ Jeanne A. Mabusth, Budding & Zoning Administrator Jackie Segner, 2260 Bayview Place Enc. July 17, 1990 Utter Subdivision Application f r- Trs V 1 W . •H ... ^***^ ••* T“*'. I V'^ *giit^or OnoOF .ORONb’J I. -------------------------------------— —______... .-,* 'i *'On iAtNartA Sherrcf Ukt MiMto^ ^ • * -C.ti;.' .*' " V - • - *• July'i?. 1??0 .‘ • - -> %•• C'jr^is 2710 Casco rcinc F.cad *j*; e t •; « t;;avtr. ta » ••!•• -. - - - 'are Hillsi-i .-lacs -.t: .-rocerties cn ..•-c.-e ---- nsar .Mr. PalcicriIm » • = V - r*curtly you ^Tir^ctcr %.c.».. p^il«*de ?lac© in rsc^rdi.-^c tde ’•‘V''’’j°Lots%'j--'^V •Wallace's Addition to relation also .ta-.-e a letter dated -d.y Sr"V,%""a'‘ddV.*ssed -o' c'el"*asseV of C.-.estnut Fealf/. This let.er uUte '?oci.'I= points of t.-.at 1958 letter. n ofl in area# located in thezrAr:rne:“n;clv.--7;^o^ .ftslrorS €^^}HHt^/5-/^Te “Vo-i.nr//8» recuirer.ent s ■ot 44 cn its cwn contains 50 5 ot 1/2 Aore. but^dee. Jet n.et 805 of t.ne l^r.JrrV^freo.n^'is net, ‘but t.tis leaves arc •*.' coae-he-a w. e - • j^ess tran the required 0.5 ac.e r.r.e cc.-T»oinarion cf Lots -6 «..c area.U A • V w «rr»d.r to qet two building sites from Lots Based cn tbe above, in ^ i^ne rearrangement would be 44-47. it would appear tnat 45, or lot width/area variances required between Lots 44 wiich lots become *combined.would be necessary depending on w,.icn iocs Lot 47 are removed. BntX)l>0 a 70MNC -•I73'?357 ASKCSSI’oC 40MlMSnUTtON 1 nNA.NCt • 47>71^ rA.\.o>esi« pisuc woaas - ohm* 1 i ■ i . I 1 • »•> ^5 ^ • ••-a.’, .’•^ w**. . f * • *•. CUT-i® July 6 f 1990 Page 2 . *•••.* • • • .,c-u-,c, VC. --= -a:<« =n P-percy ccn -^a* vcur abii.--/ ccr.- ••--••ccr-.-rr-.. questions. • -t-T’e- if VO'- ..a-» -ar.J Please ccr. .ac- ^ Sir.csre-;*' r-t^.ael ^ :cnino Acrtniscrator Assistant rlann...r an J -a .a ^ • cc t , t'*bl’C •*'or.*Jt Cit-O-atjcr.r. Cer.-.ardscn, r-&i-c HFG/Isv iiUri — I r / I • 3 >3 , V C? /•** -»I > • ^ • • ^ ':i; -K.1* -^r s •• ,••* /• \ • 'v 9 V* * ‘ - • * « . ■vVj . •''•• '■'.'i *:•' V. •• ;^ '■ ' :SV • •u‘' It. '>f*.', • - > >.. u * .•, X T»». ^ *>- % \ \ 4 ^ «<o < 1 i«r»li- ^•nl'^* t*' I *.H « !• » t*»i» f.m. ro*** c'w *••; •‘**.***r»v t •••< o^ ' u«**v*^ * ^w« l,fj )|ii »11 •< f'^ ^ • yf ^ t^t .tfl6 SC, UVll'iC* ' \t%l*l.« t» Vlli’i-** *»^ ; In.^tincH I'-m. .t ..'*. n»T jUTjmt tj.-l jtf i.ij'rpv*:»»‘nvt or ••nc? f» ,«r », V S •• ’ ♦ . K-k: mo •-v^ \ Oof fin * • .. • * •■■ • r ■' - ». • '* • : k' -'-. i ^ M »*• O ^ . O'f' 9 I- * - 40' II- 30-77 Iron aorkpr Alvin '♦. I^hi*>r ^<v. {v'.ni#^ L iKi jiify^jrorn Mm il'U.i.pr^ Mon«; U A*. rJLtO.P.iib't < »l r To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono CouiKilmcmbers Ron Moorsc, Cit>’ Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Aueust 8, 1994 I #1958 Louis Oberhauser, 2405 Dunwoody Avenue. 3865/3877 Shoreline ‘ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement/Replat, Class II Subdivision - Public Hearing Ffertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.02, Definition 43 (b) - Lot width for lakeshore lots 3. 2. Section 10.25 - Lot standards for LR-IC zoning district Review of Existing Lot and Lot Width Reauired lot area = 21,780 s.f. or .5 acre Required lot width = 100’ measured at OHWL and at 75 setback Parcel A Lot area = Lot width ! 7,600 ± s.f. * 35 ’ at OHWL, 49’ at 75 ’ setback Parcel B Lot area = 16,900 +. s.f. Lot width = 34’ at OHWL, 63 ’ at 75 ’ setback Parcel C Lot area = Lot width 12,000 ± s.f. = 50 ’ at OHWL, 50 ’ at 75 ’ setback Proposed Lots Lot 1 Lot area = 16,500 s.f. Lot width = 41.5- at OHWL. 84’ at 75 setback Lot 2 Lot area = Lot width 20.000 s.f. = 73' at OHWL, 77.5 ’ at 75' setback Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C) (1) - Stmctural setbacks Zoning File #1958 August 8. 1994 Page 2 Secuon 10.36. Subd. 16 (C) (6) - Average lakestiore setback 3.Section 10.36. Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover limitations. 6. Section 11.03. Subd. 2 - Definitions. Wfoval requited when lot line rearraneemem involves lots that do not meet the standatds of the zoning district. involves ^finition «(b) - Class II subdivision. Subdivision may involve ihe vacation of existinn •** «’«ing lot lines, subdivision will involv^ the dedication of new drainage and utUity basements ato^g t^rnewT^LfitllliTmVine aM er utility easements along west side of property, refer to Exhibit I. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners’ List D - Existing Development E-1-4 Options^of Redevelopment Considered in 1992 Sketch Plan Review (Application F - Legal Description of Property G - Survey of Replat H - Gustafson Report I - Sewer As-Built Review of Application The current subdivision application involves the replatting of three separate narcel«; inm wo lots review Exhibits D and G. The three parcels had originally c™uSd”™r^e^.den“l ha«’bLnTs^s*^~urlir''“™' In a 1992 sketch plan review, the City was asked to consider various options for preferred a Planned Residential Development of four units^ refer to mto two lots and redevelopment of the thtee existing lots. If lots wete to ^ d?ve^““ current configurations, multiple and excessive variances would have been required. The t I r Zoning File #1958 August 8. 1994 Page 3 PUnnine Commission encourased a reduction in density to either the two unit or lot line rea^n1tS"o units. cS* member strongly encouraged applicant to constder comb.nmg all three parcels into one unit. The lot sundards have been considerably improved with the proiwsed ^ subdivision does not involve the creation of new lots. The subdivision wi res elimination of one existing lot of record. Access Review Exhibit E-3. During the 1992 sketch plan review, access for the two lot division was to S^a sta^access at Shorefine Drive. The relocated ^ess ^<>"8 lot line would have been too close to the intersection of Dunwoody and Shorelme. Tte ipplication involves a single access to Lot 1 at the existing “ guff musl Access at Dunwoody is not shown nor is it recommended along the 55 of frontage, btart recommend that access be provided from applicanfs homesread P^“‘- northern curb cut of applicant’s circular drive (review Exhibit H). The Coimty " to Sent on the proposed subdivision. As of this writing, staff h^ rece no wn«en rc^il but they have advised via the phone that they will seek a 40 nght-of-way dedication for C y road - In additional 7’. The most eastern access is acceptable as it aligns with awess on north to County ^ area. If properties are to be developed, they would encourage the removal retaining walls and garage within County right-of-way. Grading/Drainage/Flood Plain Review Exhibit G. Note the flood plain elevation is located close to Shoreline rSo7de.ailed grading and drainage plans with each redevelopment plan for the two lots. Existing Site Conditions The City commenced hazardous building actions against this proper^ some ™ ™,,J^„p„.,,lCwastemov^^ The boarded up stracmres and The former rest Oorrel B arc a constant source of complaints from surrounding SXIlInding that several property owners r Zoning File #1958 August 8, 1994 Page 4 on which the various boarded up structures and current rental residence are to be removed. Applicant may be allowed to keep residence at 3877 Shoreline Drive until building permit is to be issued for new construction on Lot 1 but the structures located now within the newly proposed shared lot liiK must be removed as a condition of this subdivision approval. Riparian Use The three lots each have had residential docks. The two newly proposed lots will each be allowed a residential dock. Municipal Sewer Refer to Exhibit I, it is iK>t clear from the information submitted with the plat if the City has ever obtained easements over the multiple sewer lines that intersect the property. These lines must be shown on the plat and dedicated to the public if easements have not been granted. Reconunendation To approve the lot line rearrangement of the properties located at 2405 Dunwoody Avenue and 3865/3877 Shoreline Drive, subject to the following conditions: 1.Upon approval of tiie subdivision, applicant shall be responsible for the removal of the existing structures located on the newly proposed lot line. Planning Commission to make a recommendation concerning the required deadline for the removals of the two structures. 2. a. Prior to the formal approval of the plat/final plat; or If applicant wi.shes to remove after final plat approval, applicant must execute a Subdivider’s Agreement and post the necessary Letter of Credit to assure that structures are removed within a reasonable period of time. b. Struemre on Lot 1 may remain until building permit is to be issued for new construction or must be demolished at the time structures are removed on Parcel B. Developer shall apply for the required demolition permit for houses and detached garage. Upon application for building permits for redevelopment of these properties, builder shall provide detailed grading and drainage plans to be reviewed by the City Engineer. Zoning File #1958 August 8, 1994 Page 5 3.Access to Lot 1 shall be via most eastern curb cut at Shoreline Drive. Access to Lot 2 shall be via an easement from property granted in favor of Lot 2 over property located at 2425 Dunwoody Avenue. The owner of 2425 Dunwoody Avenue shall be advised that the area of the easement shall be excluded from lot area tor purposes of hardcover and lot area determination. Any hardcover improvements located with that easement will have no impact on hardcover inventory for 2425 Dunwoody. 4.Dedication of drainage and utility easements along exterior lot lines and 5’ along shared lot line. 5.Designation of a 20 ’ sewer easement and if an easement does not exist, easement shall be dedicated on die plat. JF pRONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION _ _ _O ^ jPERTY LOCATION Site Address 5 C-77 Property Identification Number (P.I«D.) Please check one - Property _ _ _ abstract or torrens? \ttach legal description to application._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone (hone)_ _ _ _ _ _ __APPLICANT Name JL (j / < -<3 v~- /'<3 A i\4j \5T Phone (work) Address: ^^ ‘X'S Cxty » \, Ir. ./■>.. zip: 3 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ ^ _ _ Phene (heme) Phone (work) Address:City:_Zip: (attach list xr more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels 3 Development Size . ^-3 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check)Residential; no. of units Other (specify)___________ / Present Zoning District i P. ~ ) C- 'ROPOSAL ^ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Buildxng Sites Number of Building Sites:■3 Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density: Minimuan Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per Acres Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) ♦ I m • — 4IMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION sr. sjs; 348-3271). ^ _ 4. ,As an addendun to this application; please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. edification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is iplete. iing Official’s Signature _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ Payment of fees (park fees* filing fee, sewer and water assessments). Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Title opinion. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. tification by Zoning Department that Final Flat Application is complete ing Official's Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date^- - - - - - - - -- Date •s $200.00Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II s III) Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Preliminary Review (Class I &^I*”subdivision^ Preliminary Review (Class III 4 all non-rcsidential) 325.00 +•23 • 00/I*o w 300.00^) 300.00 Final Plat Review (Class III) •(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application 175.00 150.00 100.00 applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or uested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, nning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and rher agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. licant's Signature Date Datejr's Signature_____________ _________________________ Licant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the ining Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on tne rd Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduiea Lew meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is jle to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an iorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 4 Zoning .ce of this change prior to the meeting. n.Ht A, >> S -:3k kUm) TTi Bmm m r..riu4^b^? -V ® ss ?- H 8 S J(00)P I* »(19) 7n (,OOC NO 5?09I55 (67^s t .t StI r (70). ? P»9 ijjfmL'• ^ (64)!2J liC f^rr ROAD ESM'T ODr » ?t4i.f b?e t3i 0?) - PART OP LOT 9 i no) /*• (16] CV\0^ VAC 77-19 PiSL-,^ # <rCU!‘^ j.: ” *^(95) (S))* («)i /•io li-.t. •/ *“^ -9iiLla HENNEPIN COlWTY (2) / (5) so. or 460 09 5 ~ 4 f (40)» (39) *«»’ i ‘.8 (37)3 HOC «o * kS - I 193190! ri (5) 05) •»» •« •|»<l»'0' «UN OATC 0«/21/H O MTCH 005 17 17-117-25 55 0057 AOOR 05900 SMOREUNE OR OltCR NAHE J J CARLSON IDE CARLSON TAXPAYER J J CARLSON IDE CARLSON NAHE/AOOR • 5900 SHORELINE OR SPRING PARK m 55504 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFCRMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY (PtlCRS LIST 17 17-117-25 55 0050 05916 SHORELINE OR DOUGLAS C GAMBLE DOUGLAS C GAMBLE 5916 SHORELINE OR SPRING PARK MN 55504 REPORT NO. PI45S401 PAGE 11 17 17-117-25 55 0059 05924 SHORELINE OR CLARK R OLTMAN CLARK R OLTMAN 5924 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK HN 55504 *• C PROP ADOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR o PROP AOOR OMCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR Q- •. PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR c ■ f • L c ■ t I ; ■ , PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR •t 1 17 17-117-25 55 0045 05900 DEL OTERO AVE J H BABATZ ETAL JOHN HENRY BABATZ 5900 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK HN 555B4 5B 17-117-25 55 0005 05080 SHORELINE OR COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ORONO SHOP C/O HENN CO - P.S. BIG 520 NASHINGTQN AVE S HOPKINS m 55545 50 17-117-25 55 0006 05050 SHORELINE DR S KATAINEN I B L KATAINEN STEPHEN KATAINEN 967 PAYNE AVE ST PAUL HN 55101 SB 20-117-25 21 0010 02420 DUTMOGOY AVE CALVARY HEHORZAL CHURCH CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 2420 OIAMOOOY AVE NAYZATA HN 55591 SB 20-117-2S 22 0005 05905 SHOREUNE OR RICHARD ADOLPH CARLSON RICHARD A CARLSON 5905 SHORELINE OR SPRING PARK m 555B4 17 17-117-25 55 0044 05910 DEL OTERO AVE ROBERT ROSS HOUGH ET AL ROBERT HOUGH 19215 LARKSPUR AVE MARINE ON ST CROIX MN 55047 58 17-117-25 55 0004 05B90 SHORELINE DR E J I H J HELD EDHARO J I MARSHA J HELD 5890 SHORELINE OR NAYZATA m 55591 58 17-117-25 55 0007 05800 SHORELINE OR JANET H OLSON JANET M OLSON 5800 SHORELINE OR NAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 22 0001 05925 SHORELINE DR H 6 KAHINSKI LEONARD F LAMBERT 5925 SHORELINE DR SPRING park MN 55584 58 20-117-25 22 0004 05895 SHORELINE OR R 0 JENSEN ETAL J t S RAUSCHENOORFER 5895 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA HN 55591 C;.- . !: ; -V \ ■V • i RUN DATE 06/21/94 V ’ BATCH 005 ■ : PROP AOOR 58 20-117-25 22 0006 05877 SHORELINE OR •C \ C»tCR NAHE LOUIS B OBERHAUSER . TAXPAYER L B OBERHAUSER NAHE/AOOR 2425 OUNNOOOY AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 /■ ■:L. ■C' 58 20-117-25 22 0009 PROP AOOR 02425 DifMOOOY AVE (»f€R NAHE LOUIS B OBERHAUSER TAXPAYER LOUIS B OBERHAUSER NAHE/AOOR 2425 DUIMOOOY AVE NAYZATA HN 55591 L. 50 20-117-25 22 0012 PROP AOOR 02457 DUIMOOOY AVE OWCR NAME MARION 0 BEISE TAXPAYER MARION 0 BEISE i* NAHE/AOOR 2457 OUNNOOOY AVE \ NAYZATA m 55591 : • ■■ . HEMCPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OIMERS LIST 58 20-117-25 22 0007 05865 SHORELINE OR KATHERINE HC NAHARA LOUIS B CBERHAUSER 2425 OUNNOOOY AVE NAYZATA MN 55591 58 20-117-25 22 0010 02455 OUNNOOOY AVE MARION 0 BEISE JAMES C BEISE 2455 OUrtCOOY AVE NAYZATA m 55591 58 20-117-25 22 0015 02465 OUNNOOOY AVE R V UMBEHOCKER ETAL ROBERT UMBEHOCKER 2465 DUNNOOOY AV NAYZATA m 55591 ^ • ; ^ . 58 17-117-25 55 0002 05880 SHORELINE OR CO OF HENN ORONO HAINT STATION C/O HENN CO - P.S. BIO 520 HASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS rtl 55545 58 17-117-25 55 0005 05860 SHORELINE OR DAVID UMBEHOCKER DAVID UMBEHOCKER 5860 SHORELINE OR NAYZATA MN 55591 58 17-117-25 54 0004 05790 SHORELINE DR PAUL N LARSON PAUL N LARSON 10 SHORELINE PL SPRING PARK m 55584 58 20-117-25 22 0002 05955 SHORELINE OR J I S BEDELL JANES DAVID BEDELL 5955 SHORELINE OR SPRING PARK 55584 58 20-117-25 22 0005 05915 SHORELINE OR m SASKATCHENAN ACQUISITIONS NH SASKATCHENAN ACQUISITIONS 5612 OORON OR EDINA m 55459 tn *. •‘.r. ... • :■$ ■wX ■ ••• .>• •* I?;:'::: -'W . “ «. . »• :. ' ‘ r.;v ' REPORT NO. PI45S40I PAGE 12 V :r'' A 58 20-117-25 22 OOOB 02405 OUNNOOOY AVE LOUIS B OBERHAUSER LOUIS B OBERHAUSER 2425 OUNNOOOY AVE NAYZATA HN 55591 58 20-117-25 22 OOU 02445 OUNNOOOY AVE A B NELSON ETAL ALVIN B NELSON 2445 OUNNOOOY AVE NAYZATA m 55591 •5 ..i ■w- ’ • p '.. • Vi \y. f :•>: •’ i: V =«fe TOTAL BATCH 005 00026 to QTm • • ,r--c:gn:: .. :■> iw- Vm •‘•'C ■ ■M ^ -mV; •4 : ft. ' jjfv' * f *\ . ’I . • L, I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEIfrEO ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INF0RMATI0T4 AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY IUX)HLEOGE ANO BELIEF. ; .• ».*DATE 'M IbSOx/) Ml. ' . i-r : c- ’'k L Hi v4 /V / kS>' /V / // /v\v\ ? \?*X - ' ' ^ 1 \\ ■'''•. ' ‘'■i \\\ '-' J I I \;3S^Cr\\-S*M ! 1 # * ___________________________ ■ 7^. ( ) ;• 2 A / ■i- \ \' I 'T. ^ 4 i:2L - _.\ / A w ^ -il’3 a-'J 'Ir *•: • I ir- ' ^ '. f 3 *i * ;.' ui ■’.T •^#' V . <\- / s/ /. ! fy r^\ t i N/ J \ r \ L. ^ f->. V'' ! p jT' V ? 'I- A Sk! M.\ / ^ q'-v^-3 PsS? -t ^5 fesllli ill 1st pi Ul 4 B mA ^O \ .K I /^i^v§ V ^ip §1^VA - . I <• I / d 5i Cl r* i l-\ ID \\\'n ni“’ ( '1 ' *59' . .1 \ Ml o .. •* ' <»i »/) N •\ \ S^. L-iUto '*>»'V^ A \ V/ / {f I r if ? cf- CL iD Z Kl § - ? ? lUwiitirly itarly alflot farmll*! 11a* to C. lh*t iort of b>t 2. Block 8. ________ *ly SoMlkMOtorljr Ua* of 0*14 li*t 2 to tko okoro of llM of 0014 Ut 2; tk*ar■ • aorthoootorly •ly oloBg tft* Bvtteootorly liao of oold lot 2 to Ihdo tko loeotloo of oil oalotlag Inlldlag* It dooo aot woryort to ikoo ooo ololkto * la rolatlco to tk* 'fttglocvrs, L Ho. Uo. Bo. 12766 . Blotaiers Oato : 1O-8-B0 Seal*: 1* = 20* o: I ~-fM—• loag Lake.NlnnB»t*BNrifigs iBlaMaBtkOBN *1art to a* at ditia. cr S) CP CP /-I V, QD G> — ■^.•*** * »• - !^*3 CouWTY R0A.O O . <3 3 41. fiyimqi S""il£ :i??.T? ir\r5x;£ir-^-^ - ^!T •“ •«U\lf>i butMir^a and vlalbl* harJcovar in rrUil.m t.. **^^*®*^ irojnrty. U fkm» not airport t« th(4i nny oth»r •nrroa>'hiv>Mt« '>r ln{ft>v««»nt«.lit* buunJ«rt*n of the eU/v#> d#> oDfFn 4 . IK.l«ite : Scale: o: ' An# \0 9 I < 2D Iron Narier I loa« lae.HiAntlota »•*. i- 4 -i •tir|fi||%Mi^rt \7Vn'7tfiM tfali*. t ' - — •-» .^'1 • • • V*‘* i a. 'M .‘jt -‘i i i.j 41; 3 ; # f • -o ' ! C!!9C WomWHOt ^ W *!• jcwsst C M M*vr* 9en$9^ M •OJi^ f \iWlf* n • Cood »f >om »r! 0 k?“w«TM H VI ietf« c.PA «fv>9# C0*Hytm iMT* A Ophw. H mm9 »f %«Pt n OMQ lAMPIA M itr> A fcyKOW. ff Ufrt A NAAflA. M<r«ii T (•ypfim ai 1»i« am M mo^ • AMPli A.li% DonMf C AmtMi Af TAor« A 9^ Af H A llu Af AICA -fMA PI C i.|«AOi Pf 'V'lMA. PC ^ Aff«fM Pff ^ A*<aw?t pf Ipi^pf Vl«% A llB n Opry VP MPf«A Pf ^ i Ottrm. A i> OPP4I i CdpABt. PC ^ Pn kArM Pi PMii Cpmbi p« hAmtt O MIA Pf VCP1 i Pf t iamC«p-» Pf «p%p L. \A'liMA Pf lapipo atmom M ^ ^ PC PP^P' • 'fM Pt COWVM i tPAPt Pf iAp>»A a r TIB Pf CfCAiC^tr P| PPUC MtwK Pt JPA^POPMC PI CAppn A Cw»-« IPP VI PPMfPp Hp^M OIM* P f* 1/ J Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk& f\j1 Associates CnglnepTf A Arrhltects August 8, 1994 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Louis Oberhauser Lot Rearrangement File No. 139-1957 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the proposed lot line rearrangement prepared for Louis Oberhauser in Lots 1 and 2, Block 8, Townsite of Langdon Park. The rearrangement is acceptable, however there are several issues that need to be addressed. The property presently has two gravel driveways out to County Road No. 15. The easterly access (center of property) would be accepmble for the westerly lot. The easterly lot should have a separate access out to Dunwoody Avenue. This access would best be accomplished ^ acquiring an easement over a corner of the southerly property directly adjacent to Dunwo^ Avenue. In this location, the existing bituminous driveway could be modified to provide A joint Access out to Dunwoody Avenue. An existing lanitaiy sewer crosses through the property, westerly along the lake and northerly along the west lot line (see record plan sheet A126). The sewer is approximately . will not allow a fuU basement without changing the site significantly. The existing sewer should be shown on the certificate of survey. Water service IS available along the south side of County Road No. 15. Drmnagc and utility easements will be required 5 feet wide along all lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of-ways. Existing easements for the sewer line should be snown on the certificate of survey. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLTK & ASSOCIATES, INC. I). Shawn D. Gustafson. F '-It-.----------- m,, . * 4 5o; / / SECTION 2.(NOT 4 A IS ;WER SE IL0IN6S TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Jeanne A. Mabusih, Building & Zoning Administrator August 8, 1994 SUBJECT: #1941 Lee and Wanda Fischback, 3135 North Shore Drive - Variances Continuation of Public Hearing Review of Amended Plans/Feitinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subd. 1(A) - Lakeshore setback variairces. refer to Exhibits I and S A. Existing principal structure = 30’± Proposed principal structure =» 30’± (original 21 ’) Existing deck = 27 ’± Proposed deck = 27 ’± (original 18 ’) Note; Gravel areas underlain with plastic are to be removed but were located 20 from lagoon shoreline. Variance for principal structure addition = 45’ or 60% Variance for upper level deck = 48’ or 64% Note: 4.1’xl4’ upper level addition will be located 40’ from the shoreline. This addition was not shown in earlier review. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Hardcover A. 0-75’ setback area = 23,175 s.f. Existing = 3,694 s.f. or 15.93% Proposed = 3,195.4 s.f. or 13.7% (original 3,327 s.f. or 14.35%) Hardcover reduction = 498.6 s.f. or 2.1% (original 367 s.f. or 1.58%) B 75-250’ setback area - no changes from original proposal Original application proposed 3,242 s.f. or 31.1% (existing 5,131 s.f. or 49.2%) Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) - Review of structural coverage Total area = 33,600 s.f. Allowed = 5,040 s.f. or 15% Existing = 4,416 s.f. or 14.2% Proposed = 4,923.4 s.f. or 15.6% (original 5,055 s.f. or 15.4%) No structural coverage variance required A---------- 120’ This 2%) • \ Zoning File #1941 August 8, 1994 Page 2 List of Exhibits T - Amended Hardcover Invenior\' U - Amended Upper Level Floor Plan V - Amended Lower Level Floor Plan W - Amended Lakeside Elevation Review of Amoided Pir \\ 1 ^tend over existing grade level deck and landscape areas underlain with plastic. Hardcover has bwn reduced from 15.9% to 13.7%. Review Exhibits S, U. V and W, applicants’ amended plan shows a 4.1 xl4 cantilevered upper level addition. The cantilevered addition wUl serve as a roof above a grade level deck. The structure is new and was not presented in the original S’xu'^ Ir fh elevation does not show original upper level defk at Jnvi .' ** ^ applicants to eliminate upper level deck although hardcover mventory reHects inclusion of deck hardcover. Applicants should clarify. Note the upper level s^ref^e^lag(in**^°*'"'^*^*^ ^ southeast comer and is located approximately 40’ from Issues for Consideration 1. Have applicants provided adequate reductions in the 0-75’ setback area? 2. Stmcmral coverap has been reduced. A structural coverage variance is no longer required. What of the addition of the 4.1 ’xI4’ upper level bathroom expansion or 7 ’xl8’ expanded upper level deck area (126 s.f. hardcover)? 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Options of Action Approval as proposed or amended. Your approval should include the following conditions: Zoning FDe #1941 August 8, 1994 Page 3 1. Upon af^lication for a building permit, applicants must provide an updated survey showing location of all existing and proposed improvements to be accompanied by a detailed grading and drainage plan. 2. All hardcover improvements scheduled for removal as a condition of this variance a^^roval must be completed prior to tte footing inspection for new construction. 3. Applicants to provide necessary erosion control along the shoreline of the pond and wherever deemed necessary by the Orono building staff prior to any land alterations on this property. 4. Applicants have agreed to replant any mature evei^reens to be removed as a result of ttesc improvements. or denial of amended plan finding the proposed improvement of this propeny to be too ambitious and the variances excessive as the nwjority of structural improvements will replace deck and laiKlscape areas. ch TO: ; a FROM: DATE: Orono Plannine Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator July 15, 1994 SUBJECT: #1941 Lee and Wanda Fischbach, 3135 North Shore Drive - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing AU property owners within 150’ of s;ibject prc^rt>' have been notified of rescheduled public hearing. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subd. 1(A) - Lakeshore setback variances, refer to Exhibits I and K A. Existing improvements Existing principal structure (upper level enclosed porch) » 30’ ± Existing grade level deck = 25 ’ ± Upper level 3’ baloney = 27 ’± Gravel area uixlerlain with plastic « 20 ’± B. Proposal improvements Two story addition = 21’ Upper level 3’ baloney = 18’ Variance for principal structure addition = 54’ or 72% Variance for upper level baloney = 57 ’ or 76% Note no landscape areas underlain with plastic nor grade level decks are proposed within 0-75 ’ setback area. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover variances A. 0-75 ’ setback area = 23,175 s.f. (In 1986 review was shown at 31,300 s.f.) Allowed = 0 Existing = 3,694 s.f. or 15.93% Proposed = 3,327 s.f, or 14.35% Hardcover reduction = 367 s.f. or 1.58% B 75-250 ’ setback area = 11,755 s.f. (In 1986 review shown as 13,300 s.f.) Adjusted area = 10,425 s.f.*' Allowed = 2,607 s.f. or 25% Existing = 5,131 s.f. or 49.2%*^ Proposed = 3,242 s.f. or 31.1% Hardcover reduction = 1.889 s.f. or 18.1% ♦' Deduction of easement area ♦* Adjustment of hardcover improvements within easement area ! i Zoning File #1941 July 15, 1994 Page 2 Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) - Review of lot coverage Total area « 33,600 s.f. Allowed = 5,040 s.f. or 15^ Existing = 4,416 s.f. or 14.2% proposed = 5,055 s.f. or 15.04% Variance « 15 s.f. or .04% Increase of structural coverage within 0-75’ setback area « 607 s.f. (298 s.f. for two story addition and 309 s.f. for proposed upper Ie\el dec ) Increase in structural coverage within 75-250’ setback area » 436 s.t. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicants’ Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Neighbor ’s Acknowledgment Form F - Aerial Map, 1972 Channel is Shown G - Resolution #2065 Approval of Application #1075, 1986 H - Letter from Joseph Durda 1 - Existing Hardcover Site Plan J - Hardcover Fact Sheet K - Proposed Hardcover Site Plan M -*SwlutSn #1907 Approving the Dredging and Reinstalling of Sea Wall 1/13/86 N - Permit #4794 Upper Level Enclosed Porch 7/14/82 O - 1985 Survey Locating Pond and Existing Channel P - Elevations Q - Upper Level Floor Plan R - Lower Level Floor Plan Description of Request aiS’wTf’XppeVleveftol^^^^ to fohibto k! ^ o'aM R. The existm| upper level porch IS 30 ± from the i^and lagoo p ^ ^ will extend 9’ closer to tte ^nd. up^r new addittons wtll be located 18 ^ ^^^ances but will require hardcover street side ^ ’-phe exiting deck and entry addition at approximately IM^TuTareirwili be replaced by a 600 s.f. addition coiuvisting of mud room and expanded 1 Zoning File #1941 July 15. 1994 Page 3 entry. TIk two story lakeside addition will provide for an expanded family rwm and living room on the upper level and an exercise room and family rec room at the lower level. No grade level decks are proposed although applicants should be questioned about access on grade level from patio doors shown beneath 3’ upper level deck. Although increases in structural coverage are proposed, major decreases in hardcover improvements have been iiKluded with proposal There is a reduction in the 0-75 ’ setback area of 1.58^ and in the 75-250’ setback area at 1,889 s.f. or 18.1%. Lt)t coverage exists at 14.2% and is proposed at 15.04% requiring a 15 s f variance of .04%. Please review Exhibit B, applicants’ addendum, that lists the hardships and applicant’s understaiKling ot the issues to be faced with new construction. In order to best understand statements presented in applicants’ addendum, staff will present a brief review and history of the propeny. In 1973, the City issued a building permit to construct the new residence. The residence was located sonw 40-50’ from the pond that already connected to Lake Minnetonka. In 1982, an existing 12’xl8’ ground level deck was replaced with the upper level three season porch proposed at 17.9 ’x22.6’. The porch was noted as being 40’ from the wetland.-: not referenced as pond or lake. In 1982 a new owner received permission to install a 3’ wide cat walk or balcony along the perimeter of the three season porch and at the master bedroom for safety reasons as bedroom was constructed with patio doors. A building permit was not issued as it was argued the City had approved patio doors at the upper level and the balcony was needed for safety reasons and included with the original 1982 permit. In 1975, the City adopted lakeshore standards requiring all new construction to meet the 75 ’ lakeshore setback. In 1978, the flood insurance rate map indicated that the lagoon was contiguous with Lake Miimetonka. Review Exhibits M, N and O. in 1985, survey shows an existing wooden sea wall along a channel that leads to the inlet or protected lagoon area. Review Exhibit F, note the 1971/1972 aerial map shows the channel as being installed. It is the Orono staffs "guesstimate" that the channel was installed prior to 1960. Review Exhibits B and H, in 1986, that same owner who installed the upper level connecting balcony removed a concrete patio at approximately 72 s.f. and replaced it with 144 s.f. wooden deck. The owners at that time were advised to apply for a variance application to allow the grade level wooden deck to remain. The owner then expanded the application to include an upper level 3’ wide connecting balcony along the lakeside of the structure. After the review, the applicant refused to remove the plastic beneath the gravel landscape areas stating that he would not construct the balconies and that he would bring the wooden deck to the original 72 s.f. The deck constructed without building permits still remains now shown at 196 s.f. Review Exhibit R, note that deck will be completely removed and replaced with the two story addition. Review Exhibit M, note that the channel received more permanent improvements when the Zoning File #1941 July 15. 1994 Page 4 wooden sea wall was replaced with a steel wall and the channel linking the fH>nd w ith the main lake was dredged to provide navigable waters for boats stored at the shoreline ot the pond. In reviewing ^licants* addendum, it is almost impossible to understand how anyone could purchase this property witlK)ut knowing some of the history by reviewing the tiles and the 1986 dredging resolution filed against the chain of title to the property. Clearly during the 1986 review for Joseph Durda. the City had taken a formal position on tlw designation of the pond as being part of the main lake. Unfortunately, this resolution was never filed as Mr. and Mrs. Durda failed to execute the resolutions. Review of Hardships, Exhibit B 1. The applicants note that 80% of the total property is unbuildable. 2. The house was placed on the property in 1973 prior to current lakeshore setback standards. 3. The majority of the house is located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. 4. The current proposal involves decreases within the 0-75 ’ and 75-250 ’ setback area. Issues for Consideration 1. Major hardcover reductions are proposed in the 75-250 ’ setback area but what of ^ 0- 75 ’*^ Staff would note that a 106.5 s.f. or .5% can also be reduced in the 0-75 as a credit for the 1 1/2’ width of overhang against 3 ’ wide upper level balcony. ^ As already noted in applicants’ hardship statement, the majority of this property is located in a "no build" area. Is it possible to relocate improvements within the 75-250 ’ setback* Note die entire home is located within the 0-75 ’ setback except for portions of the garage and now the new entry addition. The area of proposed hardcover improvements are as follows: a.309 s.f. or 1.3% of deck improvements within 0-75 ’ b. Footprint of two story addition within 0-75 setback area — 298 s.f. or 1.28%. c.New entry addition and mud room within 75-250 ’ setback area results in 600 s.f or 5.7%. r ■f * m ‘ 1 Zoning File #1941 July 15, 1994 Page 5 Can applicants reduce areas of these stnictural improvements? 3. 4. Is 15 s.f. excess in structural coverage of concern? Is proposal too ambitious for this property' hardships warrant the level of improvement? 5. Other issues raised by Planning Commission Options of Action To deny the current proposal. Members should refer to Section 10.08. Subd. 3(A 1-12) for the necessary findings for the denial of a variance application; or Approval as proposed or amended, subject to the following conditions; 1 Upon application for a building permit, applicants must provide an updated cu^ent survey showing location of all existing and prorxised improvements. 2.All hardcover improvements scheduled for removal as a condition of the vari^e approval must be completed prior to the fewting inspection for new construction. 3. land alterations on this property; or Table providing applicants additional time to provide an amended proposal that would address the concerns of the Planning Commission. OOTic.-^--- J. «/^C^ I § f / jc^ Q y' • ^M »A I & ' o*: |§ «;ao ri Mil'111 « Ifi3 6^ .iAi ga 1= «i If ^ hii 8: f' £ • KARCCOVES CALCULATION WORKSHEET S£TEAC:< ecne : (circle cne )<t"^ 7S-2SQ ’ 250-500- 500-1000' E xisting Hardcover in Zone A. House S.F. length WIDTH Z9Z£>S.F. S.F. S.F. . X S.F. 3. Garage .S • r • c. Driveway S.F. s..= D. Sidewalk S.F. S.F. JD?33L^ rn* X 0 'SS / S.F. 7* I4‘S . et', 1%_ S.F. ^ ^[^*tcKck ^ p. 1 aNri!5rjipc^fl!5T* x .l7fT S.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN^ ' ,J Rv 5oUTIl■^UMW IS X ,c'a 7T _ S.F. PLASTIC ’ , SHEETING^ . 1 <OiSrf\ cset^ \/nx p'/■fi S • F • .S.F. G. Other x a S.F. I--E rf Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ■ S.F. S.F. A| i a] 5.<;7f .im e£.,l7S~ V inn . lS:i-5 _% 4 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE CNE) 0-75'^’'/5-250' Existing Hardcover in Zone B. Garage C. DrIVEV^AY ife ® <k; D. S idewalk ____ E. HATfo/ 3eck F. Landscape .30 AREAS underlain PLASTIC SHEETING G. O ther Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone B1 X Xt 1WIDTH Z'to 8S S ------------------------- S.F. __ S.f. X _:a S.F. _ X _O S.F. - X »S.F, ^ X _s II2P, . X 1 4 s S.F. . X zo /8 “TO------------ ‘ ■ . X «S.F. . X S.F. . X / ^4 S.F.1 X a S.F. , 1 ( X 8 /Z^O S.F.f f , . / X '6 =s.r, X • .... X f es I&=> s.p. X S.F. / II. 'VliT X ICO " -55'-04 % OO'^/, • •■■ ■• -'-Tc- , • I -■■.**“ '■ ‘I- *** * ,v- • V’?' • ■;.* ‘.i ^ E..-:: - * iv f> :v.. ,?VM ‘4-: :".-'V.- K- .’.f4 • -'( > V ■* . ■ %%% *T®* V?^ •" •>'■•“x ’•.’' ’,•■■•■’ • • ' • -r '■' .•• '. li. ,-;-r -nr'v.v •■•■■■■• •■• ■• •:' ■• ,. . < ■•.■:••■ ■ lUw'c • s'* . t >•* .c 4.* .V .«r- -■ • .................... o.-. i . -*• ••• "• • ,.f :•■=; IS ’ •“ f) . c • ll. *vv ;.* c A t V.v-i t * r< • v ifV'yVv; . '' - •'••-** *' * t Mitl f ■■•'.■::»*•Jr ..tt Bi . vV\Vv*"*?:» iilP W,:..v.. /• J ‘' I- y/ .. -rr:! V. v ; - .A ‘:- .xa :v : }t^--------wI^=CE=== - j t v’ w 4^ K '■* * . J, T. {• •.- . .»,•»«•. ' 4i*'* :-! v •/f /^ r-: , / , ■• *.’.5**' »*•;♦ ■•V‘ V. ’ I ^ :* • . * •''. . .*• . •.' • r m . • '• •• * !q ^*- .' ** • '' ^ t ■ Sb ^ ‘-I* *“ ■ ■■■ •■■'i-'ir- I ' m , ^ Ki ■■ -.r.vfV.'. »■.•;• •••• • issil' •«• • •• l: ■ V* ' • ■.f '■■■v. ■ -p ' \ "•i ll ■•■• Vn —- v( ■ r -• ■?• . .-;5 * . - » • /N •• ______L* 1 ■•* « •* V.a lyr.'S: \V>‘: y t’ • :0-^i - ■'■■,;■; /■ •‘••I *; • ;■- • ■ • •■■ ■* ■ i . ..y ,V V . • ^ • • • . • >»• * „ .• ■ •. V.*-* I •, *<rr -i* V^ r-#,. , . •• “*■ .* . *. T ■ 1. :'r^ ‘: \i :a ; ****S-' •! *•. ' '.’i: V "h' .'E : - • i t V,*»• ,r•* .'^ ■ • ■;?•-** *• »*• •- “ V * :V ,V«, ' --V• . .; ,..V •J-Vj-H v'^ v - * .*>>:'* .» .•:. a ;.., 1 r.‘ ? irfiiV t'! ‘W r y ^ ^ * * ****•'• ,• \ •• ' *' ‘ • * ’.' -\‘ * • . , - •;■ V. •*• .■••■■• a' W’*; .- :‘V;: • W.'5-> <c ■• • •KK - • •• ■/ :.,- .J2,‘.- - ■■ z' .’ i ■-^:*-^r£5 rfr. » ': 4 y •' ^ N >y. • •N> • ••■■V- ■ y. .■■'^ .’■•:>'• ' • *'" '****fi‘** • ** \. V •.• • N./ •.; , . ;•> . ■ • '7 . . - • * • ' ^ . . »l * ■■: • 4 >;: .• *.v;iv*^S? • - • *rS-T . * • c,.^- * • *• • •«« . «.% * » ii •• - i 4.'*i? A ..-. • i ■ •,: . *•* •. • ' ’ ■ ^1 •» .»• •* * *i < *. I ■ * t»».-A, ,v r , li«iiii4i#> 00'i2/_^ --------- 9 • % I ^ ^ • r f VvN I *3 !9 11 r\ ;;;s HARBC(r/ER CALCUWTION WORKSHEE' A. House (circle cne ) ;covER IN Z one 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500 X * -IGCO' S.F. LENGTH WIDTH X 13 - .3z.<r S.F. X « /sT&O S.F. X 1 1iS.F. irxiz-.% X 6 xio S.F. 3, Garage c. Driveway D. Sidewalk ■ —7$—s E. Patio/ ^Deck < A., L ^Lm L^'k J ^ F.Landscape AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING G. Other 2£)^ Total Hardcover in Zone j mi — S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 3 I f gi i jj{^ S.F. Total Property Area in Zone 2^ji^ S.F. S'I3A\ -ITI 23,175' X100 /3,"7 .y^j ■t. Ci 'O )i """I j Ol> LSiUK-------------- L .* • i 1 (jkIe Eoo E (0 CS;' -)- $ 0)z Jr.: n-*| • ? . ■ !:•vr t \V c ' f .:i j- »’• I . -t* iJi'.'-rt*': r.i • ■ ,.!• *^} .‘,‘*‘* * ! ;* ‘'Ml*?*.. SiiiSiSiKift:": ':t;¥|:avi-h >».;M;\rV\ ‘ W |.'■. • .'-V ;•» . '.-tiri > r>i;’ . fV.. r & To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembcrs Ron Moorse. City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 5, 1994 #1944 Bradley and Dina Etherington. 4055 Elm Street - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing At the July 18, 1994 meeting of the Planning Commission, th * application was Ubled directing applicant to provide an updated survey and to have lot lines or comers staked. The updated survey is included for your review. Stat. can confirm that the lot lines have been staked. Members are asked to refer to the original staff memo of July 12, 1994. Options of action remain the same. Upon closer inspection of the site, staff would also recommend that upon application for a building permit that applicant provide a detailed grading and drainage plan. Given the severe topography along the v,cst, it becomes imperative that hardcover from development does not result in drainage problems for neighbor to the immediate west. Staff asks that if you seek additional infermation in order to complete the review of this application, please contact staff prior to the meeting. r O . TO: FROM: DATE: Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moofse, Cit> Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building Sc Zoning Administrator Julv 12. 1994 #1944 Bradley and Dina Eiherington, 4055 Elm Street - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.24. Subd. 5(B) A. Lot area Required = 43.560 s.f. or 1 acre Existing = 19.920 s.f. or .46 acres Variance = 23,640 s.f. or 54% B. Lot width - Per Section 10.03, Subd. 6(A-1) Required for existing lots of record - 112 ’ or 8055 Existing * 118 ’ or 8455 No lot width variance required List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Survey E - Drainage Plan/Lot Area Surv'ey F - Topographic Map G - Council Minutes 7/78 H - Council Minutes 6/80 I - Planning Commission Minutes 8/88 Description of Request The owners of the subject property have initiated their forth variance application to allow the sale of the property as a buildable site, review Exhibits G. H and I. In 1978 and 1980, the City granu 1 lot area and width variances to the Fullers and in 1988 a variance application was filed but applicant failed to proceed with application As with the earlier reviews, there is no development plan for the property. Review Exhibit D, the subject lot has adequate depth and width to allow construction of a residence without the need of any setback variances. The property is located in the 250-5(X) lakeshore setback zone and would be allowed 5,976 s.f. or 30% maximum hardcover. This would be sufficient area to allow construction of a single family residence with me normal driveways, decks and other accessory improvements. r Zoning File #1944 July 12. 1994 Page2 The subject property is similar in size with neighboring develojjed properties, review Exhibit B. The property is located to the immediate south of the property at 4030 Elm Street that was granted an area variance earlier this year. There is no adjacent undeveloped lands available for purchase to make this lot any larger. In fact, it is the largest of the lots on the south side of Elm Street. Note variances were granted to 601 and 615 Minnetonka Highland (part of Minnetonka Summit Park Plat) in 1975 and 1976. Ever since the inception of the zoning code and area standards, this area has been zoned 1 acre minimum lot size. Minnetonka Summit Park subdivision was platted in June of 1912 prior to any zoning standards for the City. The pattern for development has been the combining of the various substandard lots into single building envelopes. The property is served by municipal sewer and the three lots have been each assessed a third unit for a total of one sewer unit. The assessment has been paid. The lot has steep topographies but not so steep to suggest any difficulty in constructing a residence. The steep elevations along Elm St cet will necessitate deep cuts into banks to provide access drive to the building site. Applicant must obtain a driveway permit from the Public Works Department. As already noted in the earlier reviews, a culvert will be required. The Public Works Director will note the required size and approved type of culvert. Upon your site inspection, it will be difficult to determine the e.xact boundaries of the property but the culvert that drains under Elm Street from the unapproved right-of-way at the north side of the road, refer to Exhibit E, is located at the mid-point of the lot — very close to where the real estate and City land use sign have been placed. A shed appears to encroach into the property along the west lot line. Issues for Consideration: 1. Staff has been contacted by the owner of 615 Minnetonka Highland who is opposed to the granting of a variance to allow construction on the property. He claims there will be a diminution in his property values. In rev iewing the pattern of development of this neighborhood and the previous variances granted to this property and to adjacent propenies, can the City deny the current renewal lot area variance? Zoning standards have not changed since first variance approval in 1978. 2. Are there physical con.straints or limitations on this property that would prevent potential development? 3. Would the development of the subject property be consistent with the pattern of development within the Minnetonka Summit Park neighborhood? Zoning File #1944 July 12, 1994 Page3 Statement of Hardships 1. The property has been assessed for a sewer unit and sewer is available. 2. The lot has sufficient depth and width so that normal setbacks of 35’ front. 30’ rear and 10’ side can be met. 3. The 19,920 s.f. lot is consisieiu with developed lots within the neighborhood ranging from 12,000 s.f. to 37,000 s.f. Options of Action To deny the lot area variance as proposed. Planning Commission Members should refer to Section 10.08. Subd. 3(A 1-12) for the necessary findings; or To approve the renewed lot area variance application subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, applicant/owner must apply for the legal combination of Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 9, Minnetonka Summit Park. Upon application for a permit, applicant shall review access location and grading plans for construction of driveway with Public Works Director. Applicant shall provide detailed information on size and type of culvert to be installed for Public Works Director’s approval. Based on findings that there are no physical constraints and that there is adequate lot depth and width, the residential development of this property shall meet the required setback standards of the LR-IB Zoning District and the hardcover allowed for this property at 5,976 s.f. or 30%. Il0 a r R S’ 0f'-- 5T4 11 X L'w 15 ^rT7 • iuJ p-ir-r " COO) I iT * « <a ^ * (») B ^ 1 ** CO in) 2*'^ (1*5) * 40 40 • ! 1 ^ lo » f ■’^ (16) ' X R C') 1^ (2)P R P (3)pr R F R 15 R 4 ? R 1(90) •*:(9?)K R"* •F B •« , | L T r i (97)F: • 1 1?5 1 • r »25 F oak Vi R f 107. i ■R 1 -f p H» 0* . .' '* (96)R ^" i?5 F 1 •190 M L . 3 e, («5) ^ •* • V ^ 0(o‘\\i'tJkM TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator August 11, 1994 SUBJECT: #1948 Joan Harmon, 4100 Watertown Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.27, Subd. 3 [refer to Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (0) & (P)l - Conditional use permit required for maintenance of stables/bams lor the boarding of horses owned by nonowners of property. (O) The struemre used for the boarding or training of the horses shall be located 150’ from the nearest lot line. All strictures used for housing of horses are well beyond the 150’ setback. (P) Riding academy - Any such structure maintained as an accessory use and conducted by the owner must meet the requirements of Sections M, N and O of this subdivision. No such instruction shall occur less than 100’ from an adjacent residence or less than 75 ’ from the nearest lot line. Refer to Exhibits E, F and G. Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (M) - Area requirements for the keeping of animals. Section 10.03, Subd. 18 - Maintenance of animals on a property that housed animals as of January 1975 are subject to this section of the code. In 1975 applicant maintained twenty horses. Current proposal involves the boarding of ten. A conditional use permit would not be required under this section. Based on Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (M), the area requirements for animals at the property would allow boarding of thirty-three horses. Section 10.27, Subd. 3 [Refer to Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (R) Riding Academy] - Current applicant seeks a variance to the requirement that all training be conducted by owner or resident of property. Ms. Harmon is a resident ot White Bear. She notes that two part time employees live within ten minutes of the property. The owner ’s son will occupy. List of Exhibits A - Application Bl-3 - Applicant ’s Addendum Information C - Property Owners List D - Plat Map E - Survey F - Sketch of Operation Submitted by Dan Kokesh Zoning File #1948 Aueust H. 1994 W Pace 2 G - Aerial Photo of Entire Horse Operation H - Resolution #1894 I - Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/85 J - Council Minutes 12/9/85 K - Oberhauscr Letter 12/30/85 Historj- of Operation The Klteh horse operation has ..en in “^or .0 'T rp^h'^^L-iL .ere provrded. ;“of horses for owner and S«tio^I^ su.»i. .8. deaimg w,th stock farms and a home cKcupation licensing section. In response to appiration in ordS^ rd=" tok:= Commission determined that there Review Exhibits H, I. a conditional u« permit f->he anniversary date of the J and K. a condmotui ““ j^^^hen the neighbors were all allowed to vent their original approval. received another complaint nor have we ever concerns with the operation, the „ .ainmi oetmit In fact the operation has beenrequired Mr. Kokesh to tile a second conditional use permit, in u trimmed back considerably in the last five years. „ , staffs understanding that the Kokeshes have ^;:“s"':;“miSf "Mr.'Ko^k^h s son resides at the residence ft.ll time and assumes all responsibility for the facility year around. Review of Current Application Mr. Kokesh asks the City now to co^ider operation at his property. ' ‘ individuals'^and will provide brokerage consisting of the boarding ot ten horses owned Py Evolve only her five services as noted in her addendum ^o other services or activities clients Riding lessons will only be pros ded f will be provided. The property will no '“"8'=^ jn ^ f provide horse shows and limited only to the persons who board horses. No longer will the tarm p there will be no tack sales from catalogues. Zoning File #1948 August 11, 1994 Pace 3 Since the 1985 review, the cexle was amended in July of 198b providing for a conditional use for stables and bams, private or public, and for a riding academy use as noted alH>ve. Section 10.20. Subd. 3 (P) - riding academy use states that only the owner shall conduct the training activities associated with the riding academy. The applicant is not an owner and a variance is required to one of the performance standards of the conditional use permit. During the 1985 review all training and other activities were either conducted by the owners or their daughter. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the fact that a non-resident/owner of the property shall operate the riding academy raise any concerns? What was the intent of that specific standard of the ordinance? Does the hobby farm use change because the operation is no longer conducted by the owner (more commercial) -- or was the intensification in use and add ons of uses under the Kokesh years of operation already at a far more intense commercial use than a true hobby farm use.' This issue is key for this review and members should be prepared to respond. 2. Ms. Hamton has provided a schedule that records various levels of activity during the day and the months of operation noting when deliveries and certain sized vehicles will be entering the property. These activities will be greatly reduced from the former operation that was at a maximum ot twenty-live horses in addition to all the other traffic and deliveries associated with the other add on uses. Is there a phase of Ms. Harmon ’s operation that raises any concerns? 3. Staff can confirm that the riding stable and the horse bam are located 150’ from the lot line but staff cannot confirm that training areas are 75’ from all lot lines. It is not clear from the information received as to where these training areas will be located. There are no setbacks for horses that are placed out in their pastures (turn out) but the training area is another matter. It appears that steeplechase activities are conducted close to the Watertown Road area at the southeast comer, refer to your aerial photo. It will be necessary to have Ms. Harmon provide more detailed site plan locating areas of her operation, specifically, the training areas defined on the site plan. 4. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Options of Action Denial finding proposed use to be in complete confiict with the intent of the code that encouraged hobby farm use exclusively for the owners of the property, or Zoning File #1943 August 11, 1994 Page 4 W To approve or amend the conditional use permit to allow a public stable and riding academy use finding the proposed level of use to be far less commercial in use than the previous operation and to'grant a variance that would allow a nonowner to operate a riding stable at the property- located at 4040 Watertown Road based on the following unique findings and hardships: 1 Proposed level of use will be a far less intense commercial use of the proi>erty than the previous horse operation. 2. The proposed use of the property will allow the owner to maintain the facility rather than offering the property' for residential subdivision. 3. A riding academy/horse boarding operation has e.xisted on this property for over twenty-five years. 4. The proposed use will be consistent with the other hobby farm uses along Watertown Road. 5. There is adequate area to meet area requirements for the maintenance of ten horses (total acreage 35 acres). The approval of this conditional use permit and variance is subject to the following conditions: 1. Any changes or intensifications in the uses defined below shall require applicant, Joan Harmon, to file an amended conditional use permit with the City. a.The boarding of ten horses owned by other individuals not residing on property. b. Brokerage of horses boarded on property only. Riding lessons for clients who board horses at facilityc. Anoroval and granting a variance to Section 10.27, Subd. 3 [Section 10.20, Subd 3 (I^ Riding AcLemyl that would allow a nonowner to provide training of horses boarded at site base on those findings that 1 listed before. Approval is subject to the following condition. Applicant to provide a to-scale site plan using the 1988 survey to ^ be Led in her horse boarding/riding academy operation. ^ scheduled before the Council until a to-scale site plan is submitted for staffs 1. review. or to table application. f 0 0 CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE A^ PROPERTii' LOCATION . Site Address _______— #4 948 ! Type of Application to be Filed Property Identification Number (P.I D.) C.o>^0/u s DCC'l, applicant Name Address Phone (home) Phone (work) Zip •90 V iV7 OWNER (if uTo)X™0 X'^wn tta a^a£t parcels ot una: fees request with CUP application 7^ $125.00 Residential Accessory' Use -------------- /nhurrh Qrhf (monih/year) $125.UU Kesiaenuai t $200.00 Instimtional (church, school, etc.) $175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ’ $150.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ' $250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _ . designated wetland or floodplam ------ Gradini and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more ------ Grading, seawall, retaining walls wimin 75 of lakeshor PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule r \ " $100 00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) " After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee Cirr OF CI\jN0 c.f,v»;,yu OFFICE I “ »*.*^*J * .y y, }f \f Il fi-.-v^vjrvvv ^ . V' A w*i-i t a f w/ • V CHECK TL,...... *• “ * L'i T’r'f f.'fi'j /i. i i7 /f ^\f t / OTHER ^200^^Smmercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $175.00 Easement Vacation S 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $300.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District__ Present Use of Property l/^esiResidential Otter (specify)../?^ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 'J 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. ^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ Cvou can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center 348-3”’71) Plat Map. ’ “ ___ Certificate of Surv'cy (signed b\ a licensed surveyor) - reter to handout for survey information. ___ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ___ Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). ___ List of the legal names (include marital satus) of all persons with an interest in the ’ property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). ___ Coristruction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). __ As an addendum to tnis application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you w ish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Propeny Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s signature Date "T f OMTVER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by^ty staff, consulta^, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes oy^v^stig^ipn>rl5^^^nfication of this request. Owner’s signature Date Applicant must have all submmals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. PRESENT USE OP PROPERTY Present Zoning District RR-1 ^ 1 Present Use of Property Commercial Stable and ____________ Other (specify) _____ DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Describe request in detail:See attached The ectlTitles that the applicant desires to carry on on his property are as follows: (1) Boarding and raising horses owned by the occupants: (2) Boarding and raising" hui'ses owned by others, either Individually or in syndication; (3) <- Stud (4) Brokerage of horses; (5) Riding lessons; — ^e^iCSP (64—shows not to exceed two shows per year; '■O (7)^ >*Sl1lwiy nf pi»r»t^uetn as ■■ < stock or inventory* It is proposed that these activities be conducted on Parcel 11-0007, Parcel 14-0005, and Parcel 14-0004, ^ich comprise a parcel of land of approximately 25.47 acres, plus or minus, and Parcel 14-0006 comprising of approximately ten acres* /O //o/*l^S Appxxudiiu ' w wxgiiercxrxv OWNERS SIGNATURE / / The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and furthe authorizes reasonable entry onto-^blfe property by City staff, consultants agents, conunission members, and Gl^ncil members for purposes of investigatio and verification__of—t: t ^ Owner’s signature / Date // Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before th Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the thir Monday of each month. Mir# [•WlT«f*l •i7iv K-iri L*v:T«r« [•IiMHi riTiJvm^ IWI iM ( P-' My name is Joan M. Harmon. I am 33 years old. I am a mother of a 4 year old daughter. I have been teaching and training horses for the past nine years. I graduated from White Bear Lk. high school in 1978. I then attended, and graduated from Gustavus Adolphus College in 1982, where I majored in Sociology and Anthropology. Upon completion of college, I was a New Market coordinator for an insurance agency for 2 years. During this time 1 also coached 9-lOth grade girls soccer at White Bear High School, until 1986. I decided in 1985 to go into training horses and instruct ing riding full-time. Along with having my own program I have done some classes for Edina and St. Louis Park Community Education programs, for grades 1-6. My riding has been apart of my growing up. I competed as a young girl and became acquianted with Renee Kokesh. We have been friends tb oughout our professional career. So too, I have known the Frank Kokesh family with their involvement in horses. v’V- ,C, I =1+ L e fi- The tines the stable will be open to those riding there, \ith horses boarded, shall be Tuesda*s - Sunday 9:00 am - 8:00 pm. I will break that down into days and hours, below. There will be 2-3 employees, 1 full-time and 1-2 part-time, that will be responsible for the care turn-out, and managing everyday of the week 8:00am - 4:30 pm. The barn will be closed to boarders and for any lessons on Mondays. There will be several deliveries each month that will be made up of grain, shavings, and hay delivery. Each of these will arriving once a month to six weeks. The hay deliveries will consist mainly in the sumjter to autumn months The other vehicle that will come to the barn several times a month will be the farrier to care for the horses feet -It 10 horses, with 5 owners. These horses will be ridden by their owners and their children to have lessons each week. As these riders progress, their horses may be sold, and replaced with a more advanced mount. The horses we have are show horses, thus in the spring (April - October) we will be traveling to shows. At this time, we do not own our own horse van,.so we will be relying on a commercial van to ship us a couple weeks out of these months stated above. There will be a member of the family living at the farm employees live within 10 minutes drive of the ' stable in case of need beyond the hours that the barn is open. Theirs and my phone numbers will be accesible at the barn. Hours and traffic load: Summer (June 9 - Labor day): Monday - barn closed Only employees there to care for the horses - 8am-4pm. Tuesday - 9am -12pm • • •2-3 cars12pm“ 3pm • • •1-2 cars3pm -6pm • • •3-4 cars6pm -8pm • • •1-2 cars Weds. -9am -12pm • • •2-3 cars12pm -3 pm • • •1-2 cars3pm -6 pm • • •3-4 cars6pm -8 pm • • •1-2 cars Thurs. -9am -12pm • • •1-2 cars12pm -3 pm • • •1-2 cars3pm -6 pm • • •1-2 cars6pm -8 pm • • •1-2 cars Friday -9am -12pm • • •1-2 cars12pm -3 pm • • •1-2 cars3pm -6 pm • • •1-2 cars 6pm -8 pm • • •1-2 cars Hours and traffic load cont'd; ‘.1 Sat.9am 12pm 3pm 6 pm 12pm 3 pm if 4?^ t A-Mima 3 - 6 Sun. -9 am 12pm 3pm 6 pm 8 pm 12pm 3 pm 6. pm 8 pm 3-4 cars 2-3 cars 1-2 cars 0-1 cars t- 1-2 cars 3-4 cars 1-2 cars 0-1 cars School days (Labor day - June) Monday - barn closed - only employees there to care for the horses 8am - 4pm Tuesday - 8am - 11am 11am - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm Weds. - Thurs. - 8am - 11am 11am - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm 8am - 11am 11am - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm Friday -Bam - 11am 11am - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm Sat. -9am - 12pm 12pm - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm Sunday -9am - 12pm 12pm - 3 pm 3pm - 6 pm 6pm - 8 pm • • • • • • • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-2 cars 1-2 cars 3-4 cars 1-2 cars (workers) 1-2 cars 1-2 cars 3-4 cars 1-2 cars 1-2 cars 1-2 cars 1-2 cars 0-1 cars “ ) 1-2 cars 1-2 cars 1-2 cars 0-1 cars 3-4 cars 2-3 cars 1-2 cars 0-1 cars 1- 2 cars 2- 3 cars 1-2 cars 0-1 cars i/V »■mil Mn o7/o#m- IMTCH 005 NCtOCPIN COUNTY OtOOfOTY INTOimATION SYSTfH PRWftTY ONNCRS LIST MrafIT NO. OMi PI%554014MOP AOm OMCII HAMI TAKPAYCIIHM/AOOOr s sa u e«05oons ORCiuao piml mL A AM0CR3CM ASM VOGCl L A ANOCRSON ASH VOGCL ras OACMAAO park m LONB LAKE ft 55SSA 5« S1-119-2S 11 000« MISS SIXTH AVC N SRIAN L CRUIS SRIAN L GRUIS A1S5 ATH AVC N lONC LAKE m 5S3SA SS Sl-llS-ZS 11 0005 00AA5 ORCMARO RARR RO JAM PI06E0NJOHN 0 A HAGOALEN H RI06C0N 10511 61EN NXLOINB LA OLOOMIN6TON »t( 5S451 ! - RROR AOOR (MCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR % ‘ i t . 01IOP ADOR ONNm NAHI TAXPAYCR ‘ NAHE/AOOII . I y ? U • •» .'..ft *, moo AOOR . ' • ONNER NAME >; TAXPAYER 'NAME/AODR . /'PROP AOOR ;; a»tCR NAME ; ' TAXPAYER NAME/AODR f.. V . • » ' • » f PROP AOOR OIMER NAME TAXPAYER • NAME/AOOR i it r « .f. ■' ' > XS Sl-lli*25 It 0004 OOAIS ORCHARD PARK RO R A A LAN6 KEVIN N LANG SIS ORCHARD PARR RO LONG LAKE MN 5535A 58 11-110-25 12 0015 0A255 SIXTH AVC N N AND S NYATT MILLIAM 0 NYATT 4255 N ATH AVC LONG LAKE M4 5S5SA SO ll-nO-El 14 OOOl 00505 ORCHARD PARK RO 0 A H THOMAS DONNELL 0 A HENRIETA THOMAS 505 ORCHARD PARK RO LONG LAKE MN 5555A 50 51-110-25 14 0007 04100 NATERT0M4 RO FRAfK KOKESH ET AL PRAM( KOKESH 4100 NATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 5S555 50 51-110-25 41 0004 04105 HATERTOIOI RO 0 61GUERC A A 61GUERE PAN1ALCC MARIE SAMCHUK 4105 NATCRTO»M RO MAPLE PLAIN (« 55555 50 51-110-25 12 0005 04205 SIXTH AVC N CHARLES E LARSON CHARLES C LARSON 4205 ATH AVC NO LONG LAKE MN 5555A 50 51-110-23 12 0015 04220 SIXTH AVE N RAJ HArtaNG JR ROOERT C A JULIE HANNING JR 4220 CTY RO NO A LONG LAKE m 5555. 58 51-110-23 14 0002 00525 ORCHARD PARK RO R J NEESTRAND ET AL RANDALL J »CESTRAM!) 525 ORCHARD PARK RO LONG LAKE LM 5555A 50 51-110-25 41 0001 04040 NATERTOHN RO SUSAN KOKESH SUSAN KOKESH 4040 NATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN »tl 55355 58 51-110-25 41 0005 04005 NATERTOIOI RO C E DALE A G L PAULSON CHRISTOPHER F DALE GERI L PAULSON 4005 NATERTO»M RO MAPLE PLAIN »f4 55555 50 51-110-25 12 0012 04225 SIXTH AVC N N A MUELLER A P 0 MUELLER NILLIAM A A PEGGY A MIXLLER eox 5 LONG LAKE m 55554 30 51-110-25 15 0015 04500 NATERT0IO4 RO JAMES JAY JOHNSON 0 HXFC JAMES JAY JONNSUi 4500 NATERTOFM RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55555 50 51-118-25 14 0005 00505 ORCHARD PARK RO 0 F KOKESH A P J OENSON 0 F KOKESH A P J OENSON 505 ORCHARD PARK RO LONG LAKE MN 55554 50 51-118-25 41 0005 04045 NATERTOm RO EARL N DORN ETAL EARL N DORN 4045 NATERTONN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55555 58 31-118-25 41 0000 04145 NATERTOHN RO M R A M E PLANK SALLY PLAML 327 NORTH CARRINGTON BUFFALO NY 02054 ( . • #. * • ' b , • • ' ' : \ >. • k>- ' * . .t.RUN DATE 07/04/9A I «; t| tATCM OOS*?<•>.miv Aooii; OMCII NAHI / TAX^mR vt MAM/AOmc;. " ’'"ry^ MM V IM€II HAK ^ TAXPAYER ■> HAfRE/AOOR - lit SD Sl-llS-ES A1 0011 Q411S NATERT0»0< RO HXCHACL R A HART I RLANK HICHAEL RUMC SET NORtN CARRXNerON BUFFALO NT 02SS4M 5E-11B-E5 ES 0007 doom orchard DARK RO ALBERT T A SANDRA R ESCO SANDY ESCO SI NOUNT HAraLTON CUYTON CA 94517 n • ' PROR AOOR ONNER NAME ••‘i, TAXPAYER HE!#«FIN COUNTY PROPERTY IWORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY (»t«RS LISTSO S1-110-7S 41 0012 04025 HATERTQI«< RO J S A P D RICE JEROME STANLEY RICE 4025 MATERTOMI RO MAPLE PLAIN ttl 55S59SO S2-110-2S 2S 0000 00440 ORCHARD PARK RO ROBERT J A LORRAINE E RODEN ROBERT J A LORRAINE E ROOEN 440 ORCHARD PARR RO LONG LAKE N4 55S54 DOS 00024 V.\ Ti Aw.< V'</-io*- rIyy,■ ■)V-'^ ^^ \ * , v:-: 4./ 4-w.VV • -s >; .>: ■ • •* . 4 -.J ' *1 n- /« > . p- . 4 » • t * • REPORT NO. PAGESO S2-110-2S 2S DOOS 00500 ORCHARD PARR RO T F ADAMS A J L NEAVER THOMAS F ADAMS 500 ORCHARD PARK RD LONG LAKE HN 55S54SO 52-110-tS S2 OOOt 0S900 NATERTO»M RO ORCHARD PARK FARM INC ORCHARD PARK FARM INC 3900 HATERTOMI RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 . '' ♦ . T . \ L ' ' ’ • ^ ^ 4 ' X CIRTIFY THAT THE FACT3 REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCMATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY 0EPART|1ENT OF PROPERTY TAKATIONf TO THE BEST OF KY KNQNLEOGE AND BELIEF j DATE •i % ' -aL ?.• ' * 1 • •,*vV .,v, V 'i-- * ‘ Y . . V 1 ■ J . V H t *. . ' • •( t \ . . . •. • • • I • ''Mr , : S. . 4 • t *^ .*'*' •* • ' • ' • % .* •• • • . ♦ / •• . .. * - lA-::. tv - t ' * i %r. / * ■ > i ». • ? .• 4 ■ •.> ■ V'- . c» ■ ,p .Ik. • »• ^ 0 A * • ^ ». 1 ?. • 9 ^ • »»- > : rS n a; i’%H H- V'y, •*'' i' ' > A. 4‘. *r V ‘ • , * - V-‘: '/‘‘S • V • •: V ' • • *•••\* •' !• - V. * .• *;• .• .• .• ;• . / ■ H’ j.m N •* ' * 1 1>: i >*;•;. . * ^ ‘ . '.“i- » V ; • :*is • • • J** f • • • • • • 0 • %x>V0r»^ !tn% 0# f»i0 / 0f Ml# a.c. 1/4 0/ MTf/i 0f m0 $0yf0 Vt f00 acf/4. i t • ! . ♦ 171 r 33J.4$ 'p' 331,43 r 1 ♦' 1 N B9‘57*06*W 'H a9%4’6o*W % ;*» i.'. ‘ i . . • / . *, . 1 11 1 i *1 ■ f • ^ •* •::• • m* V*. • • • 4cr#f ^ «f tM gJ/i 9ffH H. f. t/4 > V . —'-il- . ^ r »*i‘ • y ■ .. . :■■"• *y »• ■'' - ;;. ■,. ,'v! I i f t.» ♦ *.♦! • ' # » » % , •'iV • V**';, \4' '\- . r •» •>. : ■: ' ‘v.r VT' 4 r ■',>.■ • fT ’.'; ^-J ■ K- ^ —i ■••V'V ', % ■•¥■■'•-•'• ;•• •■ . . . * i • * * • ^ i** T • ■•. i . ‘ j rf' ^ •. ^ * ; . .. t VVi _*.*:• * * ^ „ l • . A-*^'. ■>• • • w;”' •'■ :^^ • VI . • 5| ■ ;•■ 'M *■'* ' - V •'t* *' •i • ,.* < •1. -;■ ''i.*; ■•'tj-V . .V. -t • ^ W- .»» . * ' • ’ '•. 5 ♦ * r ' ' * -.4.^ V a surveyors NOfEf •. : y-Th®;d^Bcription is wr»at waa furnished to us and you may t«, quit# comp I »K and cumbersomf? to say the least. 1 ' iindmr#tanid this legal description is the product of the fact thatcm •that''theV'legal descriptions be chortcned and simplified. , *♦ • ' *■ . . 1. . -i . •** r • .»• ........... . Vth# various parcele Involved were purchases at different times I would suggest that .the ownPr might . V I .. LEGAL' OiSCRIPTlON OE ffECOffO: PARCEL 1I Our vcy 4I5o k-U-fc^ Th« South 7.30 «cre-i of th« East 1/4 of the Northeast X/4 of Section 31, To%-nship 110 North, Range 23, West of the 3th Principal Heridlan, and that part of the East 1/2 of the South 27.30 acres of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 lying North of the UatertOMn Road described as: Eeginning at the North»*est corner of the South 7.33 acres of the East 1/4 Of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 31? thence North along the East line of said East 1/2 of the South 27.5 acres of the Jest 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 384.0 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of the South 7.50 acres of the East 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 185.00 feet; thence South parallel *<ith the 1 foremen12oned East line to the centerline of the WatertoMn i^oad; thence Southeasterly along said centerline to its intersection with the West line of the South 7.30 acres of the last 1/4 of the Northeast 1/41 thence North along said line to -he point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Unnesota. ’fiRCEL 2: The West 1/4 of the South 3/8 of the Northeast 1/4 »f the Northeast 1/4, and that part of the West 1/4 of the outheast 1/4 of the^Northeast 1/4 lying North of the center line of the Hinneapoiis and Watertown Hoad, in Section 3i, Township 118, Rangs 23, IXCEPT, That part of the West One-fourth of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Sectio*h 31, Township 118, Tange £3 described as commencing at the intersection of the renter line.of the Watertown Road with a line 33 feet West of, neasured at right angles to and parallel with the East line of laid West One-fourth of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence North, parallel with said East line, a ilst«nce'ef 1J3 feet; thence East, at right angles, a distance 33 feet to the point of beginning; thence West,, at right ingles to said East line, a distance of 70 feet; thence South, parallel with said East line, to the center line of said road; thence Southeasterly, along said center line, to said East linel >thence North,* along said East line to the point of accordii^ to the United States Government Survey f.^and.sitbafe in*Hyrhep|n County, Mir^s^ta. PARCiEU' . . *■ .V ' ■ ■ ' ■ . -V.v: ‘ • That part of the East 1/2 of the South £7.50 acres of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 lying North of the Minneapolis and, Watertown. Road described as beginning at the Northwest comer of the South 7.30 acres of the East i/4 of the .Northeast l/4 of Sect ion <31, T. 118, R. 23* thence North along, the East.'llm of "said East 1/2 of the South 27.50 acres of the West 1/2/of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 a diftance of 264.(ftO feet *to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing North along the East line of said East'1/2 of the South 27.30 acres of the West t/2 if the East 1/2 of the .Northeast 1/4 to the Northeast corner thereof; thence West a long, the North line of the South 27.30 icrm.vto the West line of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/41 theMe.Southerly on the West «line of the East 1/2 of the 4ortheast i/4;to the center line of the Minneapolis and Watertown Road I, thence Southeasterly along said center line to its'intersect ion with a line drawn 165.00 feet West of the^ 4est line of. the South 7.30 acres of the East 1/4 of the iortheast 1/41 thence North parallel with and 163.00 feet West 3f the West line of said South 7.50 acres 616.98 feet to a 30int ksS.OO feet West of the actual point of beginning! thence East 183.00 feet to the actual point of beginning, leeord^ng to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. E % dmioitf kon ttwmme O daaeret mmi motiym9i merfted ULS I4S43 ; . •I r,• r*. • *•. . • .•*. 1 • iv • • ' ' •*. K < -W/, *• • ♦ *•»' • ,. *•',.* •> * *, : c < ; ... : . »• *' I .• ,* *•' • . • . ‘ 1 ‘ •• V : ■ r . t ' • • •- CITY OF onSUi BUILniWl5_5ERH,IIT PLAN TIE h/MC ^ Al'PnovriJ AS SUDMITTCD PERMIT NO. . 1 APPiiovrn WITH coRincrioNS AS NO!u NO I AI riJUVLD - corkMi i REGun: In.* *.® ccnirv'^i'K ue for yo'ir fHfc-rmal-nn. Ail worfi «i ,* f.i'l C( nifil aiico With All /in>i>cnb!e htiiltHnn 4 zoninf* ^t'l; mt li. iuv itcin* iiol Gf.cctf't:ill/ iio'Ctl ui l.* iXtT’ IHIS P\AH i\LT ON SITE AI AU TH ^PRCEL 4i That part of the West one-fourth of the Southeast luarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 31, Township 116, Tange 23 described as commencing at tn^* intersect ion of the center line of the Watertown Road with a line 25 feet West of, neasured at right angles to and parallel with the East line of said Weat One—fourth of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter! thence North, parallel with said East line, a distance of 135 feet; thence East, at right angles, a distance of 25. feet to the point of beginning! thence West, at right angles to said East line, a distance of 70 feet* thence South, parallel with said East line, to the center lino of said road! thence Southeasterly, along said center line, to said East XinsI thencs North, along said East line, to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate, in Heiih^pif^ County, Minnesota. •* ! ** . V .« ' f urtifr tM th/9 n^¥9y,pun,0f >' \ rtperf wat pr§pcr94 t/ m$ or undtr m/ dlr9Ct 9uporvi9ion ond that I am a da// 8§gt9t$rod Land Swv/or undm ttaauatfd b/ FRANK kOKESH ‘.r • » E SSOCIATES, . V ■ Land Surv»yor$ ’ ‘ . ‘ f-800-362-366 9W Division Buffalo, Minnttoia 65313 ' , BBirf rAZ Sirvey part of the' E.l/Z 'ot tht of ■ V y- •^aa silgL-SiJs'ate:: p!^r^''''^ ' ^ ' v-»: !• -.:SWrrr^*" *1 iL-'fl^H 1^ MiV ^«' Hf Ji* i *' ^ &f: 41 ?<r ■.& -. I: v&l *,-c^m im I f-wi r, Slt'^‘\> ;:■■ _ ^■ ^.f ,4^; iv V I ^ '•’’ ** m.T2 ' Z’-'' t IJv S' il ■*> y;t ^'Aip, M : •-o‘> \ n ? - > '. .•• ■ -; ■'. •«. t-CN, m laZ"'^'\ >m gfe^^ ■: il >:«m--,:’-' <Mv,3 w-f _ . A.... ■ : MCl^wBi « I 1 * City of OROINO CITY OF ORONOy RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1894 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONIW; CODE SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 4 (A) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SDBDiyiSION 3 (F) PILE SDl^DIVl (#994^ WHEREAS, Frank Kokesh (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owne- of the property located at 4100 Watertown Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: The west 316.50 feet of the South 1088.1 feet of the West 1/2 of the South 27.50 acres of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31, Township 118, Range 23 lying North (of the center line) of the Minneapolis and Watertown Road, (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application for a variance to permit the keeping of do.mestic animals for comir.ercial purposes per Section 10.27, Subdivision 4 (A) and a conditional use permxt to permit the continued use of applicant's property for the boarding of horses, rental of horses and instruction in the riding of horses per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (F). Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #994. 2. The property is located in the RR-IA Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The property contains approximately 35 acres in area 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this November 18, 1985, and recommended approval of the proposea variance to allow the keeping of domestic animals for cormer purposes per Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision t recommended approval of a conditional use permit continued use of applicant's property for public ri mg use based on the following findings: A) Applicant's principal residence is located on a 35 acre site. B) No other vari ...ces are sought to Section 10.27, Subdivision 4 (A) - keeping of domes animals. ^ .1 CITY OF ORONO city of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1894___________ C) The proposed level of use is compatible with surrounding 5 acre "hobby farm" neighborhood. D) The property has been used as proposed in this review fir over 15 years and has not resulted in any harm to the publics' safety or welfare. e: Thi:. citv Council finds that the conditions existing on this are oeculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property ar p ___ • __ f^ietrict* that granting the variance SS ^e^fnTf^ti rstfnt t^h^ Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the Cit^. 6. The City TeiS^ntaf K™he hM\th°”safety or general ® “j^or'" othM^ t^:”li^hS Vt’o^;ert\^Lrn/r° wl A ^ wl-tytre^ntenr ana ohjectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS orono City Based upon one or more of the above the^jl^no^^ ,^y council ifeeping^^ domesUc animals for10.27, Subdivision 4 (A) to allow ^ grants a commercial purposes and per ' ^inued use of applicant's conditional use permit to permit the enh-iect to the following property for public riding stable use subject to tne conditions: i i n;»rt time employees hired by the 1. The total number of full and part time p y shall not applicants to assist in the special events at exceed the level of 5 employees ^ establish level of which large assembly permitting process shall temporary employees. 1. Riding lessons are to be provided by members of applicant's family. 3. Horses maintained on property shall not exceed the allowed per Section 10.27 Subdivision 4 (A). 4. Applicant shall renew conditional use permit annually Council specifies otherwise. P.nnr» 2 of 4 I CITY OF ORONO V j 3 Citv of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1894__________ 5. Authorities granted by the conditional use permit run with the property not with the owner and are permissive only. 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the teras of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of December, 1985. ATTEST: (^^Prd^perty Owner ity Clerk Mary C. Bu^er,' Mayor > Page 3 of 4 CITY OF ORONO City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1894__________ NNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY or KENNEi’IN ) On this __ day of l^gfore nie a Notary Public within and for said county# personally appeared MA, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ known to ine to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) frie act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this /B'^^ !‘i^ i>»57 : a No^ry Public within and for' said County, personally appeared Ihc. is.t^cA-[_____________________known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC /f87 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 hihutes of tff PUomiNo commission meeting held NOVEHBEH 18, 198S. FACE 8 #993 TONKA VtaTe that approval of the request would create a chanqe of use because the clientele from a transmission shop differs from a gas station. He noted that he would like the property cleaned up. There were no other persons present regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Callahan, • 1 r*»c-nest #993 Tonka Transmission to amend the permit dated May 9, 198 3, maintaining only 10 parking *^use” tAe °‘,|rnaVst«rn^ reiiew alternatives to removing the gas tanks. #994 PRANK KOKESH 4100 WATERTOWN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOBLXC BEARING ^^'“^hliU Callahan^exp^^^^^^^^^^^ “?te""ot the ip;u«ntl" 1. continue with the keeping of domestic animals for comjnercia purposes. Attorney Lou Iberhauser was present for this matter, representing t "le applicants. M C M,.« Farl Dorn, 4045 vmtertown Road, were present for Mr. & Mrs. Earl Dor , voiced his irritation at the this matter. v^r. Dorn meetings. He stated app’icants' rel jsal to ^ a misdemeanor offense. ^He’not%^* t^t ;-in ?“%^„°LVs‘falrl’yr^HVa^ 'tl;i c'^iisLKfhe ha°s%"e%ested a copy of Scott County-s public stable ordinance. MS. Plank, 414 5 Wntertown Road, was^present and state^^ was concerned about applica applicant, and what theproperty recently acquired by applicant, conditional use permit included. Mr. Oberhauser stated ’^J‘®gip'’rV<pTe"sVfor a conditi;^?m^ri^^trr«rt%te"ex\^triri-el of use. .8 4. nmr,licants' corvnercial operation hasMr. Dorn stated that applica created 100% more traffic* Kelley felt that riding lessons should be limited to family members only. MINUTES OP THE PUUINING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 1«, 1985.PhGE 9 ERBNK KOKESB although the actual number of employees needed was unknown t< him. Planning Coraission felt that the number of employees shoul be limited to a maximum of ten people. There were no more comments from the public and the publi hearing was closed. Tt was moved by Goetten, seconded by McDonald, to recomment innrovri of the conditional use permit subgect to staff : ?^?o^eid!tions ana conditions, amending the followin. conditions^.^^^^^ to apply for a Home Occupation License fo ^^An^hlnges or additions In use or intensification o approved us^es should be reviewed V‘«.':"\^eluiredStaff can determine if a new permit is q Conditional Use Permit to be ten 4. Number of outside personnel be limited to ten. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. ZONING AMENDMENT Planning Commission tabled this matter until the December 16, 1935 meeting. approval of minutes* McDonald, seconded by Goetten, to ?PP«ve the MLuterof the October 21, 1985 Planning Commission meetin, as submitted. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. COUNCIL MEETING REP^^ATITO i„ted to represent the Plannim Co™isslon°at the De'cember 9, 1985 Council meeting. ADJOOR]^ ” "?t was moved by McDonald seconded by Goetten, Planning Commission meeting at 11.55 PM. Nays 0. minutes of the regular ORONO council meeting held DECEMBER 9, 1985^ #988 JAMES E. 2. stated that they would like the survey tc include the location of the house to the south. It was moved by CounciIraenber Hammerel, seconded by CounciImember Adams, to table this matter until the January 13, 1986 meeting in order to amend the resolution incorporating the 20' setback between homes and pending a survey with location of adjacent house to the south. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ^^^^I^Ifraiik kokesb 41^ WATERTOWN ROAD COHDITIONAI, USB PERMIT RBSOLOTIOH #1894 ^ Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit for a public riding stable. Representing the applicant's was their attorney, Lou Oberhauser. He noted that the applicant has never rented horses to the public and has had a maximum of . full-time employees. He stated that applicant felt that review of the condtional use permit annually wa- unnecessary. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated Commission recommended annual review in order fo city to keep tabs on the operation. It was moved by CounciImember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler; to adopt Resolution #1894 approving the conditional use permit and variance for a public ridinc subiect to the following conditions: 1, The total number of full and part time emp oyees hired by the applicant's to assist in the commercial horse operation shall not exceed th level of 5 employees except for events covered y c Special Events permit. 2. Horses maintained on property sha 11 the number allowed per Section 10.27 Subd. 4(A). Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE #5 A.R.I. CONTRACTING INC. mi#-1 Kpconded by CounciImemberIt was moved by Mayor Butler, secondeo oy Frahm, to approve the Request for P y n crystal contracting Inc. in the amount of $35,887.89 tor » Bay Sanitary Sewer improvements. Motion, Aye 0. LOCHS • OBERHAUSER & ASSOCIATES, PA 4Tro»»vcr» 4NO couNsruoms at law 1421 C WAY2ATA BOULEVARD • SUITE 210 WAVZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 D€c<?«b€r 30, 1985 c7 c* // / / 7 »612* 473 2521 crcouNScy CITY 0? ORONO 1335 Brown Road South Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attention; Jean Mabusth R.t conditional 0« P.mlt/Frank Kok.sh Our File: 8014-1 JW3 iS6E CITY OF ORGNO Dear Ms. Mabusth; I ha.. r.vle«d th. R.aolutlon. I b.ll.v. that a correct de.crlptlon Of the property would read as follows: ^ e t-h 77 5 acres of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Th. South 31. To».shlp 118, Rang. 23. lying ZT.’ th. cnterUn. of th. ““"r.:? 1/4 i“tiorn!°"T::;nrhirtt8:'R::::.";: Ji-g -rth .f^h. c.nt.rlln. of ^H. Minn.apoU, a^ Wat.»o^ :rthrl;’t^1^r.c?..T^ j Of th. s„t in !j!„r;rh“of‘rLi«}!n.’tf rsis.ij“ciir.Sd Watertown Road. Under Paragraph No. 4 of the rlg^t"t^revlIv'^tL”^ 5 “rfti““r.:urr:/«™‘L::,rtoT.n:: r^ndltlonal U,. p.mlt on cn annual basis• I respectively request that Paragraph "renewal process" Conditions, be changed to a "review process rather With the above Indicated corrections we would be In a position the Resolution and pay the balance of the ee. If you have any questio^^ please give me a call. Slntex^l^ / LOUIS LBO/ejw cc; Frank Kokesh . J .\r^ TO:Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: August 4, 1994 SUBJECT: #1949 Sanford Erikson, 4455 Forest LaVe Unding - Variance - Public Hearin Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22. Subd. 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback variance required for lake side deck and four season porch. Existing - 24 ’± (includes 4.5’ overhang) Proposed ■* 34’± Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Review of hardcover 75-250’ setback area (review Exhibits E and F) Allowed ^ 3,600 s.f. or 25% Existina » 3,156 s.f. or 21.9% Proposed = 3,455 s.f. or 23.9% No variance required * 14,399.4 s.f. List of E.\hibits A - Application B - Property Owners List C - Plat Map D - Sun ey of Property E - Hardcover Site Plan F - Hardcover Inventory G - Floor Plan ‘ H - Elevations I - Letter from Owner of 1146 Wildhurst Trail J - Photos K - Average Lakeshore Setback - Site Plan Description of Request Applicant proposes consituclion of a 19'xl4’ four season an‘*rr!ra'lre^^^ to the lake side of the existing residence, portions ol tthtch wi 1 ^ ms a occunied bv a patio and front porch overhang of approximate 4.5 . already extends beyond the average lakeshore setback line. the improvement. Note the area of Tract F has been excluded from the lot area of he proi^ y as S f is the driveway access lot for 4465 and 4455 (note use « Wildhurst Trail). Tract F is owned by the applicant but based on the ° .. j- must be excluded from the dr>- buildable area in determination ot hardcover and lot area facts. Zoning File #1949 August 4. 1994 Page 2 Statement of Harddiip Review Exhibits A, C, H. I and K. applicant ’s addendum notes that property at 1 146 Wildhurst is a deep lot Topographic features and the depth of the lot have encouraged development more to the midpoint of the lot. Higher elevations to the southwest and the exiting plantings along the shared lot line minimize any visual impact of the lake side addition. odd shape of ^ lakcshorc lot to the northwest has also intensified the impact upon the determination of the average lakeshore setback line. There is no impact upon the lake views of residences at 1146 Wildhurst Trail and 4465 Forest Lake Landing by the propevsed improvements. Issues for Consideration 1. Have the hardships been substantiated? 2. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Options of Action To approve as proposed; or Amended. /I A I t • vr ic5 •‘Lrri‘k.( «wct% i • >w^ I ' • I /*.*■'«• f V • * ^ «V«.‘V/VfV WWA f%VA CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICAT^IQ^ Liitial Application Fee S200.00 | / (S50.00 per each additional variance; Rei«wal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original applicauon) Variance for non-confonnmg smictures $200.00 After-thc-Fac: Fees (Double application fee) Prenertv Identification Number (P.I.D.)------------^------------------------------------------- L^h legal description to application^^: not inctad^on requ«d survey. Date Property Acquired KVWU-----:d:sz:----------------------- - r % - w tt V'tCf ^^ ~iT *2*IT^rc * r*"»if w»," A w W'W Vf*»< rrv vvk V'A fwf fcW'V#. • ^ AaVV**' C C ru t ■** ‘ t%Wk.C.A( • f » ^ • A . ,»T.. " V • .* A • (month/'year) jjate t^ropeny /-vwHuuwca--------------------------------— 1 (do) SoS^ also own the adjacent parcels of 1^. pLent^irrf^property: jL««dential -----other (spectly). Zoning District: Phone Oiome) 472 •* S"? --------Phone(worlO,^5IIil3: C^C-csT applic .ant Name ^x C^ecsT tKVAg umxwtucy.Zip: S^^fe4>_ OWNTR (if different than applicant) Name_____________________ Phone(homeX Phone (work)_ Address:Ciev:Zip: description of request Describe request in.detaU: pV C,>«» )A thccx ------------------------—--------If ^ ^ ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area __Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage /'"'Average Lakeshore ____ Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------- hardship /description of unusual property COwmONS^^^^ preventing 44^*5 Vot^JECT UK^g: To *_____________________(attach additional sheets if necessary) ^ 1. 2. 4. required submittals .n ,K. infonnatioD m.m IH- sfhminM hv th^ opplirnriffn ilr;.rtline dalt in Qrjg for vntir aoDti^inn to be considered completei 0^ of ownen —■ Hcnnepm Count>- Department of Finance, A-603. Govt Center, 3480^ ). i'^lat Map (obtained with property owners list). :„rinHe hardcover i/ ^Vetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8 x 11 ). — LUt of thriegal Kimes (include marital riaturi of all persons w.th an m.ercri m the — nroDcrtv Tlds would include name(s) of apphcant(s) if not current owner(s). AS «?ddendum to dns application, please anach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ^ ^ ^ • _____ 1 AC t if 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.\y^ Additi (CkV^ ncev jfcT ^rntinn. Please remember that vour / APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE information required or requested by the Zoning The applicant hereby agrees “ P™ ' ’ covered by original fee payment) Administrator “ P“>'certif,es that the rL«i-rc?rtorb«t of hisihJi^hnowledge. Applicant’s Signature fM OWNER’S SIGNATURE _ onnlication and further authorizes reasonable ]^^“r'o agents, commission members, and CouncU Sers for pSrpLs of investigation and «rir,cat.on ol tins request. Date Date 1 *1^4*“ 8 /V.iUH oiTi or/ii/f%MTtit tmCMCi NM TAKPAYf II HAHE/ADOi ^ ftOP AOOfI , OMCII NAME TMPAmi n 07-iir-Ei ^ 0005 04445 roifsr laei iandxho T n LEMKE IAN UmKE TINOTHY H LEMMC 4445 rORCSr UU UmXNQ HOUND ftl 55544 SO 07-117-25 24 0022 00050 AODOESS UNASSXGNEO llOOCfl H DYBOTN omicc 9 Ktmim 11040 HYLAND Till EDEN OHAIRIE MN i' ' PiOO AODO ' aNNER NAHE , TAXPAYEII ^ . HANE/AOOfI ■ ■» V # ■ 4 V- ..OHOP ADOR OMIED NINE TAXPAYEII NAHE/ADDII .Y .!■ •4. .V i;. 'V,- i: • (-N " 55544 50 07-117-25 24 0027 01144 NUDHURSr m LYLE E PANN ETAL LYLE E PAHN 1144 NXLDHUPST TPAJL HOUND HN 55544 50 07-117-25 24 0044 01154 NXLDHUPST TP OAVXD N PANN DAVID N PANN 1154 NXLDHUPST TP HOUND MN 55544 J; :’ • . y ^ * i ■ . ' ' ■ ' ‘ ' ' '*v ■ i ^ * V 't ' *t * f- •i%4-. 4-*V • • ■ I * HENNEPIN COUNTY PPOPEPTY INEOPNAIXON SYSTEM PfOPEPTY QHNEPS LIST50 07-117-25 24 000701104 NXLDHUPST TP 0 0 PASHUSSEN/S J PASIPiSSEN OPIAN 0 I SANDPA J PASMUSSEN 1104 NILOHUPST TP HOUND MN 55544 50 07-117-25 24 0025 . 04475 rOPEST LAKE LANDING PAY D HUPLEY PAY DONALD NUPLEY 4475 rOPEST LARE LANDING HOUND MN 55544 50 07-117-25 24 0057 04455 FOREST LARE LANDING S H 4 M J EPIRSON SANFOPO i NARGAPET EPIRSON 4455 FOPEST LAKE LANDING HOUNd MN 55544 50 07-117-25 51 0057 01200 HILDHUPST TP DAVID J RRUSRO’F I HIFE DAVID J KPUSROPf 1200 HILDHUPST TPL HOUND MN 55544 *'* r,*'.fc .. * ■ ■ t .♦ I •• f- I \V 4 *n ^ • • « » ^ i V . i >1 •N. > *• • X •>V‘ • /f*-- V 7^^ KPfXT m. PI45»01 PAGE 21 .50 07-117-25 24 002100050 ADOPE» UNASSIGNEDPOGEP M OYOOTHOPUCE 9 REHPXHG11040 HYLAND TEPEDEN PPAIPXE HN 55544 50 07-117-25 24 0024 04475 FOPEST LARE LANDING RAY 0 NUPLEY PAY 0 HUPLEY 4475 FOPEST LARE LANDING HOUND »tl 55544 * 50 07-117-25 24 0050 04445 FOPEST LARE LANDING JON D DLACRSTONE ET AL JON D OUCRSTONE 4445 FOPEST LARE LANDING MOUND MN 55544 TOTAL OATCH 004 OOOll \ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE REC0PD9 OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHEHT OF PROPERTY TAXATION» TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATETIW iddlL^ I.%* ■\V- 'V • : ■ I * #i’vj- i. 'i<• * » #•’> •% .* V• *<%•♦ I ’ \ ‘ i- =tfc # *• * ‘.fc I t »- ^ - t.- 1. * k ♦ n ■J * f * k > ,* * * •' .-K •. i . '*.• • % « ^ •* •'•"V. ‘ /. I f p * . i ' • r'*..V ■>>. ) \ *• «** s. . . • •* ^ J ? J*.1 \ \* • i)’ ’< " i • • H V :r:v ^ i ' M’ --;- K ' , r -'it *. ' f y*• V •« ,»'* 1 -r. Is-. •- r ' •» «' •»I» ' ■ G=.y-> ^ —y 'll EGAN. FIELD & NOWAK ...-^ SURVEYORS 741SWAY2ATA 0LVa MINHfAPOUS, MiNHiMTA \tr, OF SURVEY "r„ ROGER KRAINES _________— A^\ V \ ' V ' V-\ V- ^ \\v. o^crrption: Jrac.. Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of.Hennepin. f ' Jt'^4 0 Seale:I ”=60' \ A '\ ' \ WiS HEM HAS S ffICHOFIlMED U: ' /Iz-i V* ^ ** -V 4 . « ?>/ ^N» ‘ \> . /Ti\‘\\* % r . -oo <'' f’of^csr p. ^'A \ ,VU\' ' .' ' I/Mt. / V \'■^ \» •*.' ■ Vvi _______..../ \M 6\;. - - ___ ------Z55.00------ We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all bu 9^ if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on sa»o • f.ay 1975Dated this day EGAN,10 4 ^OWAl file No 1285 Book No 20[i7-U8 lurveyors 1 \ rvey of i I dl ng^ land. ! I • i tSvj\kD.\ Ki£» ;----— 44 SS : — C^Ci?o^Q^—_.—^—U-.—^ ' ■ I : I ; i ! . ’ ! i ! _____— I « TRA.CT t*. TT^-v'^^^ = U^.-V'*? /s-o m "31 _i___;_ I i "»*1 S^ 1 j<p^4»4 ^Q.^»j fVgT.frfc Ck l^gCaOji^MCgl , A------^^^—I ^ ; ; ; ^ :—i ! ^ XR^X-^ I ! 1 i i • ;I i t t 1 i^Rj£.R€icce: I ).C.jLRX-Vf_oX3 vj RHSX^A® 1- I » ! i > t i i 1 i ----------i- 1 t i ! ■u—t xpp>.ct Cg.i^sevAo rr'^ i ‘ I t i I !! I i 1 f.'* M w j -r^’-r ,-v ' i i ^ 1 i » ( I r i 1 ♦ ...» i I ! \ »i »f <5 J I 1 PRCRoseO 4------i ;\ ! iSJ 1 i !\’ iN. : \ \—^ \ \ ACO*Xc»^i _U -------i ■ 't— „,. i =.-L-: i i f I i ! i t 1 I i ■ ---------------- • 1 t i \ ! L i\ i . A \ » \ \ / : ! \^\ -----------—^ I ( • C'rv-------——i----- I F.: i i ; ^ - i ..-i- ! : ! i 1 X"i'i V !\ j 1 - • ■■ ■»—1 ^ IRPsS-XB, #:o oe cK. I I Tci^esX' -c-fcxe— I i t i I < m • -_1-*rRftCT * ......^ t I • / c ( V I ) » I ! \i*3ei=fi^K.v;J I k M —■ ! ! —- » * t 44.55 FOlieST V.4KC L4HO'm6r r——r-' ! i -----* » • 1 ! I ■ : '{It: ^ ^ ^ A"___• ___ • : . ; ; ' i 1 1 i ; , ........--i' ■ . , . i ! I !I i ; !I :i ! r i i ; i ! : S * i 1 i , i i z . i 1 : 1 ? i ! 'i 1 i '/ • ' ^ ' i ! i i 1 1 . 1 . 1 i i ^ : I;__^^^^__;_____i.’ ■ i ! . f ) 1 ■ ! /5S Vr>|) i i • I jy ‘J3I i I j I i ! ! z^tet i II ! i I ■■ i ; i i M 1 !r [ ; . ! I ;i I \I i • \ < f ; I i I »■■■'■■'■■ »■Mill * I — f t i i ill! ) !1 i i 1 _i_ 1 ! £ui%tih6 eAW€o>Ky i I ^ ? I i • ! f ! I I I 1 » I ! !j ! 1 I !i i < I i 1 i i i ■»....... 'f I i ! ! ! i j ( 1 1 i i j 1 ! t i I i i i ■ *-I-----------■ » j___L \ \i I * J ! \ !; ( t t I \ lvu:.\>♦.Is > Ct'j i* i'l *Jllf4 » .t trf.i V' » a '■T- m I I r,; •.TK . i \ I d i \ CO V:iiL V Iroit jvirK^rl J*n *'.« SC»> .f i >( ) i\\ 4\«l\) Vlb'AS I — «' 4 ^ w 4^ r-» .^- >. -*• c A X > ^ I- • V -* - - ■ -.* , SMk ■ &, yjt. V‘v#'f P***^ »’ ( < i ^^ ^F I «i^ * # V ^ ^ ^ ^ #9 • Vf ^ •^ 4^ traC *,'. .•-*LCi. '-Uw i.'V % . • ^.1 4 4^^ , ,. » -S| » A.* J •> ^ . ^ . 4 i ‘ ^V" -. ^ A %ii ** •' ., 'V • • ^ ^ v.ca:^, ;^5 jII r r I To: From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorsc, City' Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 10, 1994 #1950 Glen Upton, 3685 Notth Shore Drive - Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback variance 2. J. Required => 75’ Existing = 31’ Proposed = 42’ Proposed = 41’ Principal structure addition Deck Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75* setback area = 8,380 s.f. (Note area of utilities and driveway easement not included per Section 11.03, Definition 24; approximate area of casement = 8 742 s.f. Note also hardcover improvements within the easement area have not been included in hardcover inventory.) Allowed = 0% Existing = 1,491 s.f. or 17.8% Proposed = 2,238 s.f. or 26.7% Increase in hardcover = 747 s.f. or 8.9% 75-250* setback area = 350 s.f. Existing = 0% Proposed =0% Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage. Total lot area = 8,380 s.f. Allowed = 1,257 s.f. or 15% Existing = 1,208 s.f. or 14.4% Proposed = 1,876 s.f. or 22.3% Variance = 619 s.f. or 7.3% Zoning File #1950 August 10, 1994 Paee 2 IReiiew of Setbacks A. B. Side setback. Required = 10 ’ Proposed = 11.3’ No variance required. Street setback. Note street lot line is located adjacent to County right-of-way Required « 30 ’ Existing » 71 ’ No variance required. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners ’ List D - Adjacent Neighbor ’s Acknowledgement Form E-1-2 Hardcover Inventories F - Survey G - Street/West Elevation H - Section I - Floor Plan J - Topographic Information Description of Request The applicant proposes a 20’ x 30 ’ principal structure addition with 22’ x 24’ attached garage and the removal of the existing detached garage and storage shed. The entire structure fs located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Any improvements to this property w;ll require hardcover and lakeshore setback approvals. The structure meets the required street and side setback of the LR-IC zoning district. A portion of the 20’ x 30 ’ addition and the entire deck will be located within the DNR required setback for General Development Lakes at 50 ’. The DNR has been a^ed to comment on the proposal. Staff will present Ceil Strauss’s comments at your meetmg^ There is adequate area in the west street yard to move structural addmons out of the aO DNR required setback. There is 10 ’ between the easement and the proposed 20’ x 30 ’ addition and 8 adjacent to the garage. Note there is no required setback for structures from a dnveway easement. If s^emre was to be moved to the edge of the easement, there would stiU be a 22-23 separation between struemre and travelled driveway. Zoning File #1950 August 10. 1994 Pace 3 Per Exhibits G and H, the addition is a single story. Review E.xhibil J. accordir.i! to the Cit>-’s topographic maps, the existing house and nrcposed additions will be out of the flood: plain at the 931.5 elevation. Applicant should provide more detailed topographic (spot elevation) information with survey submined with building permit. Statement of Hardships 1. All five houses served by the private drive are located within the 0-75 ’ setback area, refer to E.xhibit B. Aoproximatelv 8.742 s.f. of utility and private driveway easement area cannot be credited agaiiist lot area nor can this area be used for residential construction. 3.The only area available for residential construction is located entirely within the lakeshore protected area. 4.A residence has existed on this property for over 50 years. 5. The property' is served with sewer. Issues for Consideration I. Is ihe proposed improvement too ambitious for this limited property? 2. J- Should the stmeture be moved closer to east side of easement to minimize the intensity of the lakeshore setback variance? What existing or proposed hardcover improvements can be reduced or removed. no s.f. or 1.3% landscape area underlain with plastic 12’ X 22’ proposed deck at 264 s.f. or 3.1% 600 s.f. connecting addition at 7.2% Options of Action Denial of application as proposed. Refer to the necessary findings in Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) (1-12); OR }i Zoning FUc #1950 August 10, 1994 Page 4 Approval as proposed or amended; OR Table, based on the degree or number of modifications sought by Planning Commission in an attempt to reduce hardcover and impact on lakeshore setback. Planning Commission members may also wish to have detailed topographic information before making a final recommendation. ! * « CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S200.00 tf j- ($50.00 per each additional variance) 7# -H' Renewal Variance Fee S^OO OO (no change from origuu. application) Variance for non-confomung structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^^ A/l^ ^ li rJj ^4^— Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) I • * ' i ^ *k(1 :jJ # ■ PV '*•** w A ( * v*» WMC «r 'V r ' rrjfc . V W-Ni* V ' • V*. . « - A* *»‘0 ■* u «. V' t ■ tCv ivOl •l'!'V- rTupcriy iuciiuiivraiawta v- ^------------------------------— Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey, e Property .Acquired (laonth/year) 1 (doT'(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. 1^1 use of property: X residential -----other (specify) Zoning District: APPiirAVr Phone (home)_______________ N>me ! 5,- Pho«(«.Tjrk) <>fl3/3y /i i 2 Ciw: ,•? t -------Zip- gy //-^ Name __________ Address: 3 A ^ Phone(home) ^'7 / t r ! <^/\d ________ lone (work) 'j\JA 5/r^^Ci$: r,^r'A^<± OAVNFR (if different than applicant) a.lr^. 7 nfrcA/^ Phone (work) Zip:<^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Cons^cuon Cost % — Desenbv;; r.p.cst indetaU; /fJc/ A X,C'k 7<0 ______ tT V ^ ^ ^---------- ----- (anach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot .Area ___Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage X. Setback:Front Side Rear X Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION of U ’NUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS pracicM difficulty or unusual property coodi.ions preventing complimice with Zoning Code requirernencs.-------—------------------------- ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) LLp-^ - r rr.rkin r rrrrrr u w/f < AUU uii # .■ t ‘ f *u *:- V V' • *j uJ/'i.*’ V"'/» r-'tii I c'u T7 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AH of the foUomng information must be submitted bvthe application deadlme date in order for vQur application to be considered complete: 1. ___Completed Application Form 2. ___Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). 3. ___Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. __Certificate of Surv'cy (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8',i" x 11" for reproduction. 5. ___Topographic surv ey (e.xisting and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy Sli" x 11" for reproduction. 6. ___Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy S'/i" \ II"). 7. __List of the legal names (iiKlude marital stanis) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include narae(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 8. ___As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 9. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yolir variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. .APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature^Date ^ 0 OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetmgs of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building &l Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 f ated ;ated Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (we) ^ 51iirrvi f3?s5[gj: (print name(s)] of *S/t<rre Df> ~lc'ay24lfA (print address) have revCT-ed the plam for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located '^uHShc. 5h->e Oe. also referred to as Land Use Application No. -----. p“: uieTur:;eX»Tor toTfleram (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbofs project or use requires Council approval. Propert>' Owner Properu' Owner Date Datejr'ropenj' vjwuci \ I (we) (print naine(s)](print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvemem or proposed use of the property located have revieweo v Application No.------------■ 1 (we) understand that m eaecuttag this "qJ *^0^ project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date DateProperty Owner AP p !S.7-ibrn^o-or n“^ to the scheduled meeting date. #• m f f>CU A 1 ♦* • •X { » •r- • j. i' U*. ' y X 2 •X B ' ■ E.*ATI0/D eck % /2. Z •X /2. O j .r * ■r • e 1 Aun^rA.pP. . , • • •• • t • ■. X ' • |:v 1- ■ i . . i • AREAS UNDERLAIK .». »*• • • X m• PLASTIC • SHEETING r X • • V X . .j, » i .^ #G.Other • » X • • N pliil'-^Wm /’ *.)r^ • >• U U« u • V U M O • •'< M %4 fl| « «4 O M C 0c u u 4i o O -« * *0 *M * Qi*>i *0>« c 4J «<M li C ^ :3 Ai C C O 0-4 -U C « -H «M l4 ^ C O « O -4 *o « *o< a « u u it%si M Al V >H « ^ oe <« 71 w 4) « >« irt • ^ Ai ><t f>4 ck c: 3 «J O 0 • -4 Q i: u > J Ai « V r* >,tJ O H fl H AJ AJ T3 to 4 c m tr^* «^ CO 10 «M H \o «j o *o V n ki u W >1 Ai O H 4.T k4 u u ^ O U ^ O »M »J • OU « O rv-' - I (r .:..7 # .V V.' 5;\ r>‘.' ;v.sV •■»;/»< ■■■■ ■•.-'• N \ > Ji'h ^ ^'^ITrSlv . ** • • %s'- • ■ . ■■''.•■f i'.--;’!'''. • ■!*•■*!'’ '• < . . ' *’ * l'* 4 '’* V ‘ ■A ♦ • • t' I fc f , !/•» *,t .*? ■ .‘r - •*•,• 5 • It it ‘ .*• •i;«.«-.. .V?-* - • . ’ , * •-* I ‘ • . . . ; • • f : i "k.* : * ' - < ?. • ' * \‘*' •' ^ '. ' * L- ■. %' .• •i^.^ ‘',f ^4 .4.,1 ‘, V‘'."••* * ,,'• •*r . * / •L • . * *■ . ' • ■ 1 •: , • •5‘ ■ *» ' 1 ^I ,1 il^ • 4 \ /i'. K* r>-' !S‘K- ■ :'v.-7,0. •■•- ■ r' .• ':V- •►'Vi’Qv*; ,'V.iSii'Vi M I ?U; . • • V» • ■ , '.ij ■ •A * A A k . • - u. V/ »*. • I / , /. ' ' . • •.*.’ . s f V * . • • M . **'V' • K. % -'Hi. . , « • ’'ll I -•' * . • » • -V**. . ■ • • ■ ■ ' . /'• . • V.-•: '» • ■ t .,,!• , I • . *• • ; / ■' '* • . .** ' i. •; I : •'*«. • • r-:-r.y,7j • .1 • • ♦: I’ • ■ ♦' ; . •I If f Tz:' * * - ; IQ • 01 ^ u jC 10 u M u ^ u an c • o o» -H >« U ^ 41 n M 10 *0 c 01 4i M 3 ^ 01 O O n ^ >»0 U mum 4J 41 u M «o Q 0 • -H 0) tM m 01 «u o 01 «M C 0 O C 14 u •H 0 O * 10 ^ «H tH 01 «o «* a*H <0 >1 *H C •o 4i 01 ^ 10c: c r fO 3 4i C C 0 OH •<u c t ^ «M l4 j : c o 01 O -H *0 01 *0fo aoi M i4 0 o O 01 o cQ c x: 0 6 U 4i O ^ 01 4 PC 10 X E 4J 41 01 10 >1 0) ^ pH 41 >tB M ac M 9 a u m V m 0 • H Q x: u >1^44 r- >1*0 O X 10 -H 4i 4> CO 10 C 01 tT44 < ^ CO 10 *H SO 4» 0 *0 01 0) U U 0) > P O *H 4» U U U «M t o u m Kj ^ K *'s ,J J. .-.r;. , 7-7' M' . •i'''! ; ■> '\ ■'i'f •!. 7 ^ t‘ I . ' ' « I • r' • t • * 1. •! • i’- I • •• ’ ’' ’ 1 * 1 .#• ; ,w.. / • . * s I - • ’ t ....... • 4 * ’ ' V'; s r. ’ .Vr'.V.iv-.’: >.; '.T- ;•:. ".if* ;w•' • . • • 4 I V I I. • * • • • >j ♦ . ■ M t l‘^ 'X t r ^ ^ »• •* * *1 V % ' (A 1 •• <•I . i n*:- '•■** :•'-. 1‘•V'L''.' - ( rv-vJ ' • r • ^ ‘ % tV^v* • ' r *>• 4 » . ^ ; r'• -4. ‘*\W •* r-v.»' k' 1 • > • . ! ‘*i t!’' i ^14'V v;;V‘ •. • !v’ <.K',h. ♦ • V • .’. 1 S ,V •• * u ll • / ^v’^‘ ' , . . - ( •»• f .f .} I * ' • .• . • !•,•, ‘••••-5 "*f »*l“* .11. •-• ' f . '• \ a \ w • »\j » A ^ • . •••*•., 1 • • '• ’ » • 'V • ' ; r '* . . ' .vS :••■.;•;;‘ " • r •' i' •'* '‘ • /. •• - ';; ■-> . . >1. •* 4 * • * ' p • • , » ' •*« • •• ■■.V-'i ♦ * % » t f H % t «« 4 k « 1 «* 1 4* * - .'4 ••\ • 4 » ♦ "M 1 •L,'1'^ VV'.'V "-r«’ • j •r'Vv ’ >1 ‘ • V '• ^ »• ' • 1 • %*•’ » ' . *• M “ . )* v;:‘ :• !/, ‘ .: ■« '•'• .*••■7 • • .. ..• .1 • I , • * . (; > - ♦ fr l.i ♦ 41 ^ «»4i* f • »* .. • • • i / •. r.‘ ‘ ?• ‘ V • * . ' . . ' ' * 7 'r-' \ • •••' ■m'; • •: .vv M •.' • .' V--; . .'■' • •. ' . -I. *'. , .'. . ‘ ‘ ' If l> ■ , . • J . i » m. * • ir I * ’ '• * ! ly,^* * • .' J* .. V* tS* / ‘V ‘ •' «• I-•' V:‘ ,'-r. '• • •f.-v . i . <■>■;• ■■ . V 0I * * • * ' . !(' .* • j -- < ««•* • • • ■ ■ . » ; .* ‘ ’» *: ‘ ■ r* v .1^‘f..- r;. ■; • . t r' ' ’• r • i.‘ . —L>- V' >;!».• •' •'* ••' i(1 •, ■ • z • .I- ■. »-i * i.iV‘ .V-2 'IaWi: / , ? I ; ; I • I • 4% - . . • ‘. » > < . \y . / • * r* / * *. • / • I .f.'lv * V, ,\ m:. . • ’ • #1 . ( • ■-•Vh.lV<,;: ^ ' .I-,; ' .; '*»¥•' i *. * . . , • • *• •. *•.' * •** / ^ «__M____!__•._________________________!_______________•___ « ' \ , I • . \" ■' * .» : • vr» ,»’ :o : U) *1 ' / • ^ di * £ I ,• * j ' ■.:.;';0 A ixj z c o O z • UJ O ■ Q X < t : — or 2 T 3 < A 3• a■c o a:o X J 000 •OkP TO:Planning Commission Members Ron McKirse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE; August 11, 1994 SUBJECT: #1951 Kendrick Melrose, 50 Cristifori Circle - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.27. Subd. 5 (B) - Side yard setbacti variance required Existing Principal structure = 49’ Existing Deck structure = 42’ Proposed principal = 35.9’ Proposed dcck/stairs = 31.4’ Variance = 18.6’ or 37.2% = 50’ List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Original Survey E - Weckman Memo 8/3/94 F - Current Survey G - Detail of Survey H - Lower Level Floor Plan I - First Floor Level Floor Plan J - West Elevation K - East Elevation L - South Elevation M - Staff Sketch ^ ^ . N • Resolution #3095 - Resolution Approving Street Setback Variance % Description of Request In March of 1992 original h™J owner received a srree. «back ^ to be Dlaced 75’ from the street line rather than the required 100 . The variance setoacK approved based on the steep topographies, narrow width of gentled l«aiion of dense vegelalion to the east. The house was bu.lt m the sunme ot 199 . T^e residence is under new ownership and the current owner SMks apprOT exercise variance that will allow for the expansion of a first lloor family . p„posed room. The existing principal strucmre is located 49’ ± from *he »u.h s^e ^ Jmpos^d principal structure will be 35.9’. An existing deck/sta.r strucmre e^fo^he* * into the required 50’ side yard. The proposed additions will encroach 18.6 into the side y I II -j Zoning Fi'e #1951 August 11. 1994 Page 2 Review Exhibit E. Weekman confirms that the proposed expansions will have no impact on existing and alternate septic sites located to the north of the residence structure. Review Exhibit I, the owner notes need to expand to the east and south of the existing kitchen area within the first floor (Exhibit 1) fer a family room as house was placed right at required side setback A strucmral addition could not be placed to the north of the kitchen as it would have a major impact on the existing interior layout and overall concept/function ot current house design. Statement of Hardships Please refer to Exhibit A, applicant notes the following; The site consists of 23 acres but the topography has placed severe limits on the building1. site. 2, Location of kitchen within residence requiring expansion to east and south. 3. 4. Extensive vegetation exists along the south lot line and natural building site for property to immediate south would be approximately 150 ’ or more from the north lot line or the south lot line of the subject property . The lots within Cristifori Woods PRD. refer to Exhibit C. all were approved with special setbacks 50 ’ front/rear and 30 ’ sides. Staff would add hardships set forth in Resolution #3090, Exhibit N. Issues for Consideration 1. 2. 3. Are the hardships valid for a house that is only two years old that was already granted a street setback variance for new construction? Why is it necessary to have the deck encroach any further into the south side refer to staff sketch. Exhibit M.. At your site inspection, note the topography and the improvements below the existing deck. Why must the stairs access at the south side where there is already a substandard setback? There is adequate area and sim topography to the north and east of the proposed family room addition. Should the area of family room addition be reduced in size in order to minimize encroachment of side yard setback? 4. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. r I ^ iHi f ^ f f Zoning File #1951 August 11, 1994 Page 3 Options of Action To deny the application as proposed; or To approve as proposed or amended. 1 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee 5200.00 ($50.00 per each additional van; Renc'W'al Variance Fee 5100.00 _ (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures-$-00.00 Aftcr-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee) M- ^ Q "I . i.r ‘» T* Y':\ r ■ Tw(•ri u i^I ~ » I » I w v *»V ’C*Tr » »“*Ti^w V ^ w vv a ^ ^ •' I / »m property INFOR-MATpN ^ Site Address iTO___Cr<sr/^.o^ ^^ircjs. Pronettv Identification Number (P.I.D.)^_______-:——----------------------- A^h •leg^de^rip.io^ to appUcstijn if not iodud|^on requtred survey. I (do) (momh/year) 1 too) Iluo u^.yalso own the adjacent parcels ot 1^. Presen^W^roperty: _^residential -----other (spectfy). * w f 1 r REQLTRED SUBMITTALS All of the following inrormation must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form " , Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150 ’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property 6wners_list)._^__ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surv^dr)~and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'A" \ 11" for reproduction. Topographic sur\ ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy Sli" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/i" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATXJRE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses meurred in review of this application, and cenifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. \ /Applicant’s Signature ///^ ^U£/.AJSf^O OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. L IS m Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting, Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Conunission and Council. If an applicant is unable to anend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 Oh-117' — T^-~ 7 * • * V •. • RW DATE 07/12/94 BATCH 010 ME^t«PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OUTERS LIST PROP AOOR C»fCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO OA-117-23 11 OOOS 04244 BAYSIDE RO VCI CAPITAL INC VCI CAPITAL INC PO BOX 375 LONG LAKE m 55354 30 06-117-23 11 0004 04050 BAYSlOE RO CAM COrtlELL GARY 0 CONNELL 4050 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 PROP ADOR OltCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 30 04-117-23 12 OOOS 04355 BAYSIDE RO VCI CAPITAL INC VCI CAPITAL INC PO BOX 375 LONG LAKE Ft4 55354 38 31-118-23 41 0003 04045 MATERTOW RO EARL N DORN ETAL EARL N OORN 4045 HATERTOItl RD maple PLAIN MN 5S359 PROP AOOR 04MER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 38 31-118-23 41 0011 04115 HATERTOlPI RO MICHAEL R I MARY E PLANK MICHAEL PLAfiC 327 NORTH CARRINGTON BUFFALO NY 82834 SB 31-118-23 41 0012 04025 HATERT044 RO J S I P D RICE JEROME STANLEY RICE 4025 KATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 PROP AOOR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR S8 31-118-23 43 0012 00045 CRISTOrORI CIR N F t E KNAPP NILLZAM F a EVELYN KNAPP 45 CRISTOFORI CIR MAPLE PLAIN FM 55359 38 31-118-23 43 0014 00165 CRISTOFORI CIR N F t E KNAPP HILLIAM F A EVELYN WUPP 4300 BAYSlOE RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 > PROP AOOR OMAER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SB Sl-118-23 43 0017 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED M F A E KNAPP NILLIAM F A EVELYN KNAPP 4300 BAYSlOE RD MAPU PLAIN MN 55359 38 31-118-23 44 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND FOR SALE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY ONNER ONLY PROP AOOR 0»tCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR TOTAL BATCH 010 00015 ' 'i’ ' • f If • ^ • V • B II I »• .» RUN OATS 07/12/94 j . BATCH 010 HEMCPIN COIRTTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY (»MERS UST . • f * L ' . ‘I.Vu.* O' • Ks\. ■ '.i ! < ^ s. . • ■O '! :.*!:• ' ' '•:fV> -V " H-• *4' ' ' v' 1 ■ i: •. • 4, ; • .• •■M S'- ^9 #* ■J * , ^ * ■(' n.:-/ * i ‘ ■ , >; ' "4. REPORF NO. PI435401 PAGE 36 38 06-117-23 11 0006 04010 BAYSlOE RD CURTIS F ELIZABETH LEVANG CURTIS A ELIZABETH LEVANG 4010 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PLAIN rt< 55359 ':C ■V.-. I w- 'jC■f SB 31-118-23 41 0004 04105 HATERTOW RO 0 6IGUERE I A GIGUERE PAMMALEE MARIE SAHCHUK 4105 HATERTOHN RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 ..V c ■ •* . 4 SB 31-118-23 43 0002 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN IDNR) CLUCE LINE TRAIL I •C 38 31-118-23 43 0015 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED H F a E KNAPP HILLIAM F a EVELYN KNAPP 4300 BAYSIDE RO MAPLE PUIN m 55359 ^wiaL CD ‘■f VI 38 31-118-23 44 0004 00050 CRISTOFORI CIR KENDRICK B MELROSE KENDRICK B MELROSE SO CRISTOFOI CIR MAPLE PLAIN m 55559 h* A ' *• Prv .F-V,.r ^ * .V ''f * 4 ■ •? «‘.s ' .. • >: i. ! -ilv / '■A V ■ REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 37 • *•: li.- i -» ‘i* * ^ • • M'Am ■-'V t w* «N: ■ • .t ■ ,4.' -'-M•• 1 I r,f ,r* J "j'/ ';, - M CD m .1 ‘f •< i i .UK- / W- ' i ’ * ' fY* I -I I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRiiP INFORMATIOri AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS 'n.' DATE -rii V I • ■ • Mi ^00 V.. V • ' • * -' ■ ’•* 1:/ I« ■ t .V .*• I• • A-tfJ . » . * * *4 ■ • 's ■ ■ i.. ■' • i '.J ^ * 4f:. J. j-.D ' . > ••• 'O. .Sf A: • ». • \ • ■* JQ0g4)ZQ-^^gc^■>ii!o6g ua. a. SG< *: Q ^iQaamS I ■? 9 TO:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator FROM: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:August 3, 1994 SUBJECT: Application #1951, Kendrick Melrose - Septic Review The purpose of the septic review is to determine whether the proposed addition to the south side of the existing house will affect the existing septic system as well as the future dramfield site. The existing and future drainfield sites are several hundred feet north of the existing house and will not be affected by the proposed addition. The addition is a family room which wil no affect the wa'er usage within the residence and is not near the existing system or the future drainfield site. Based on the above infonnaiion. the home addition will not affect the existing sewage treatment system, nor will it affect the future drainfield site. 9 •O •-4 Vw 9 9 • • at l.i 11 I I I • ;ide ite. and not lire , » • . * ;r a/ , f •■ ■ : ' ' .< . .•, ’*•*•'•.1 : a ,Ci, : .:. -:, .. * - - -. ' «• r i'.',-'•»’•• - •— :±• •• r***>• -r • * V y »V ^•. ^* ■ ■ ,' » •*l' *■ ..S ■ ■ ^ > -■ •. -' - '•• ■•■% ‘ i-r -. *,'■ • • * # '• V.r>^ '''4?- tw-aai; lirfaiU l“•30■ • • ; '• 'v.r. . . vv-jVj. - - f , , nu Vi nv ; t — • i* .. f % t -.^-1|/!V' « 1I’*'- .’I1- r ■'* • : • ^ 11 -r^'. 1. i- •■« • - ' 1!*'• ' « I1 1" ■ ♦:*• " i-j|^^^ . ■'<■■'" V*-. ,*| r . #♦ <- •:.f [i: . » I • r . •- • • • •. % • • • ■%' ■ •5T- ----m/R' •• .1^ t^^ii V ’■•'•.■.» .• •.,• • .. - . . , ‘i :* ■• • ■ ^ i«'’Hlac? /^(Sr<;H /<■ 'T'o'f^. '■/••;•■ • ■ ■ ■■ ■•v‘ '■ ' • • •' ■■V \ *•'.** ... ’. ’ ji,-JL^ » * .• I : .* • ■ . ;• • ' V * •; V* V • vV -.V • . .• . ;• •• •• l*ri I i ■\l ^4 r.- « \ t .,.: ■ . V - I ‘ *r. * p. • i , •. * . ( ' ■tvV ^ "-.v-.-vV;'-.. • . »^ •« N** • ■I • -J; * \ ••■ I • -• •<; •: - .A .-. v ..*•' ^ a: ’ ; :> ' f »• ’' ^ • i * ;t.. * • •*• s’ .i '»*♦.• •v'-- • ♦ •“ • •. , * •;. ; ^ .*. • : . • *i • II »»• • t ’ •: • - ^ •'. #t • •' j»• • •• ?. o ‘ • . • . •! • « * •• • .•> Jr " i • / I -i-.ii—■— ,,-1. . - ..........................I , •'. • * ly* *.. ♦f /* >./• /. > % . r*-ir » V/ • *M 1 V *.i •' • > •. '• .1 f • 4 i ' :.‘‘ t 1 ^ A.' I i. H-r* -■ ' .» ’>• ' .. . # • k I • ~ •• .; r^. •. .V ' , i ‘ * • t I ’ • • > » ■,’ I •Vf ;V. 'sV**; —I C- f ■ •>•>.■•■ 'i >• ■ • . • .. ,*;1 7 :A • •' .4 ^ '*; . » ia'-c#"• . * I • « • • •. • -■ v • V1. ••. ^;■>. •.. ^ i-.'C ' k.. V.«k V*. -*■ ^ J-V \ . • ^ • j fo. t I . vy# , * . . . . * 4\t*. •t I ‘ f ; •' ' I *«• »•• V4' • • I. • . I-. •. • ^ * I • • I •# % *. I »/1 ^ ; . f t• i ^ , . . ; I . . • . .tf>;:\. r-j. i r-J •• i • •« .1 • !•• ••**.• .- f • I *• • • V .• M I’J ’*/ Vl'^ .4 ■ ';k\v.-;;,.,c'''v^Mv-- ♦ • #••• • • • •i«;.. i.). » —• •>« W, t • '/•» • ' « •* ^ ■ M • • 4. X’t 4 ' . i .. . • * ’'I’k .• • • ' .* j -.“i* ♦•"t':0 * * **»« / > .»> , * s y J/^4 «• r m GITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3095 WSHO NO A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL XONING CODE SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1718 WHEREAS, Davis Pansier (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 4180 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described follows: Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, South of the southerly right-of-way line of the Luce Line *rail. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a the frLt or street side lot line where a 100' setback is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota:FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1718. The property is located in the RR-IA Zoning District. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application minimize erosion and the major cutting into steeper elevations. B Severe slopes to the east and north require placement at the top of the ridge in order to minimize the impact on extreme dense vegetation. Page 1 of 4 r CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.3095 4..„e City council has o J?L^“inV’"co™fssion?\^Vortfby City staff. the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on IkI. are peculiar to it and do not apply aenerritrtoVher prope^y in this zoning district, that granting the variance would not adversely ^^ffrd traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring is merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, or4e''?oL^ng^^o^2 and Comprehensive Plan of the C^ty. CONCLUSIONSr ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or n.ore of the above findings, «he Orono following conditions: 1.a f^nrwT rif the easement from the adjacent property to thrw"e"st°V."ting ”a"ccess to V?hV^%L°:ncr o"f submitted to the City prior to the issuance building permit. 2.Authorities granted by this ri"y"a\"d"SLt'l"e «VrSser by; appU^^^^^ appit«ir™^thls^va"rl\"ncrti^^^ expire on that date (March 23, 1993). 3.Violation of or non-compliance ^ and conditions of this variance f violation of the zoning code, shall terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of 4 • * •• • CIT¥of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3095NO. 4.The undersigned applicant has read» understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of March, 1992. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of March 1992, by Barbara A. Peterson s Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ^HENNEPIN county ^ My • II CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 309_5__________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. cd— day of 199^ °.e%o?/;e-r:5S#T^ appeared V '^JiLer^brd^’ in and who execiTted the foregoing J!js\rt:en:r aid "aVknot*iedged that he (they) executed the sa.e as his (their) free act and deed. notabV wSu^'- mSnesota HENNEPIN COUNTY My OO^wnlstlon •vplr«t S-12-90 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ,S^ )ss. On this _ _ _L_ _ _ ___ _r*-' J £ - _~T3K Notary Public within and for saia ^cayy Known — --- vT ■—■— a»v<»f-uted the foregoing instrument person(s) described in ft-hev) executed the same as hiSnd acknowledged that he (they) executea (their) free act and deed. day of OMhl saifl Coui , 199^, before me personally appeared known to me to be the •----3nt, his r ‘JdMILIOSIM lotpwamrr MyCaiCisiwilMMy Page 4 of 4 RESOLUTION #3095 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO I Dorothy M. Hallln City C^ ^ " /have compared the count,. Hinn.tota, Council of the City of Orono foregoing copy of a reaolutio ^ I’tion in the Minutes of the Council at said meeting. r T have hereunto set oy hand and seal this In Witness Whereof. I . 19^_ _.• 24th . day of - - rilin' City Clerk (SEAL) J- i TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Aueust 4, 1994 SUBJECT: #1952 Christine Freeman, 2240 Shadywood Road - Amended Variance Application - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.22, Subd. 2 - Amereled hardcover variance within 75-250’ setback area and 250-500’ setback area. A. 75-250’ setback area = 10,644.5 s.f. Allowed = 2,661 s.f. or Existing = 3,995.9 s.f. or 37.5% Proposed = 3,634.9 s.f. or 34%* *614.s.f. or 5.8% landscape area to be removed; 1,113.5 s.f. or 10.5% gravel/parking and driveway area to remain. B. 250-500’ setback area = 1,714.8 s.f. Allowed = 514.4 s.f. or 30% Existing = 1,033.78 s.f. or 60.28% Proposed = 948.4 s.f. or 55.3%* *104.6 s.f. or 6.09% landscape area underlain with plastic to be removed; 410.4 s.f. or 23.9% gravel driveway area to remain. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Applicant ’s Addendum C - Plat Map D - Property Owners List E - Resolution #3383 - Approval Application #1893 Approved 2/14/94 FI-2 Hardcover Fact Sheets G - Floor Plan Application #1893 H - Amended Hardcover Site Plan Description of Request In February of 1994 the City approved a side setback variance for a 10’x28.6’ addition to the west side of the existing residence. Approval of the side setback variance was conditioned on the hardcover being maintained at a conforming percentage. 791 s.f. or 7.5% of landscape area r Zoning File #1952 August 4. 1994 Page 2 underlain with plastic was to be removed and rock areas defin«t -.c i plan that were adjacent to the garaee totalling some 1 ->65 s in the site Plastte underliner. The appljLtton was rev\w“ of all It was ntore difficult to determine the rock areas adjacem Hhe gamM® T'‘‘ building inspector was to the complete an inspeuiori of the hmic^! event the inspection for the ikw construction. footing At the site inspection, the building inspector noted that a car was narked m ih. of the detached garage. Members mav remember that at the time nf ^ was no sign of the crushed rock area ^ ^ ^ variance review, there shown on the amended hardcover site plan Exhibit plowed. The rock area Off Sirec, parking arua ,o .he -r^S„fe'' ' “““ areas, ihese areas are considered ^ardcover^gardless'irwrjrret fpSVr:d^^^^^^^ fo-l^S “irgT~ - Statement of Hardship 'sr “ was pushed into the garage, lie applicant al.so^not« replaced when the owner’s boat in the area prohibiting growth of natural groundcover. topography and shade trees Issues for Consideration iyl“et%k^ tolfrLVsIdf - - - -- ^or ^''2' tw?offparkin^srik? ■ Area wtId equ^Tl 234?"or 2.19% funher reduction in hardcover (refer to Exhibit H). ^ Do the majority of propenies in this neighborhood have off street parking areas? Other issued raised by Planning Commission. 1. 2. 3. 4. Zoning File #1952 August 4, 1994 Page 3 Options of Action To deny applicant ’s amended application and require immediate removal of plastic underliner beneath crushed rock area. Area can no longer be driven upon or require tte removal of the crushed rock and the restoration of the area to natural groundcover; or Approval of the application as proposed or amended. If a section of the gravel parking area is to be removed. Planning Commission should make a recommendation as to deadline for the removal. ch ^ r CITY OF ORONO - V’^ARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional varian^ Renewal Variance Fee $1(X).00 (no change from original appUcaL^ Variance for non-conforming 54.ou.uu .Aiter-the-Fac: Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site / G ( a n\ ; t e o ^r--, V •rrv rewaft A'..:.'\ * ? 4 ^ *f *r w u IA 4»'wvw V'V' vvv :vrr rrrr-r *r Sn » w w-« • .a w w t-'I ^ WW' WWW A rr^ 1 AVwft a V'V • vvf'irri* Ti ».'».•» A a V'V'• w uiw«’rTwT.»r♦ r^‘ V "*#i Mi.b.WAf f f I WV t,'m5 I vu • / -'.n V I «• W' xOi oftxxao Date Property .A,cquixed (month/year) I IMI (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ^ Present use of properr/: X residential -----other (specuy) Zoning District:------------------------------------------------------ Pheoe (heme) Phooe(woric)_V££:^Zl^.APPLIC.ANT . <//07o 2S~^ JA £---------------------------------------------------- OW'NER (if diffcre.nt than applicant) Name t=g.fefew\<°»4 Phonejliome) y7/-74>Z2- hoce (work)____ 2ip:5X2fLL Estimated Cocstruedon Cos: S__^ A,.......- sAM>.uco» --------Cicy:_oao^ description OF REQUEST ---------- Describe request indetail: tb) Artcu &—^ AioUf. sit>g •'. -aKe.r np |.|0»TVUI? ^ —iiSsS-------- .*.0 y/Ki^tucb^additiooal sueea u cecessar:/) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot .Area __Lot Width X Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) compliance with Zoning Code requirements: HeAv>i.^ A*\-^ ■— Po^^ir^e Fo^—DA. ar7j£^ “ _____ I n CTT7/ -■*-"-- . Lr TO 4»Ye»/ A0^*lr fajgn t/l </Jrrt=(^g.04/ < / (attach additional sheets if necessary) r REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. 4 AII of the follo^"- infnrmntion ^■bmiKed bv thf appUsatiqp dMdline date in order for vQur aDplif^tioo copridgrgd cptppl^tg. Aijcliciticc Form ----C'Tif cd P'ocerr.’ O^vxsrs L;s: of owners windn 150* C-'Cu mus: cbcniz ±is !is: frc= Hencecii: Counr/ Depan=eot or rxacce, A-wu.'. Govt j-S-.'-i 1). Plat Man (obtained ^v^Lil prcpcrr/ o'^ncrs list). ...... ----r--Jrcat- of Sur/cv (siencd by a licensed snr.-eyor) and induce narcccver ----caicuiatioas as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy Sla' .x 11’ for renrcduction. .... ._ • . • ___ ar j nroco'cc eievatiocs) IT 3HV changes ine.xistms rraceTocograonic rur*ey (.e.XeSAUig ana prucu-c-t. / ,;, e. ----—* nrcco^ed Ln addition, crovide one (1) copy S'>- .x 11 for rtprccucnon. ^kVc-s or dans of rlccr i eievaticn views (provide one (I) copy 34 ’ x 11"). ----List'o7'the I^ai names ^induce mar.ai staras) of all persons with an interest in die ----Drocc.'T/. Tnis wcuid include namc^s) of appiicant(s) if not current owner^s). As an addendum to tiiis arpiication. piease acucn a separate list of any ocher pers. 6. / . 3. 9. lersccs you wish notified of this appiicacicn. Additional items as may be requested by C.cy smrf. Ta- A:ci:cint Acd Proc^rzi' Owner icust sign tins srniirsf.on. ?!edss renteacer ±at -au; ..Si.n'/. .nnllcntinn is' not comnit.e if the above infomniiOB has; noc been inglud.gL Lfe'bC^'^7^ provide ill Lniomitioa required or requested b.v the Zotnog Sinirsnutor. agrees tfpay addinonai fees (saff tune ret covered by ongaal tee p^nsent) sEd/or coiauitaot e.sperses incurred in review of Ibis application, and certmes ibat Jt. information supplied is true.^dM^c: to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signamre ------------------------- OWNTR’S SIGNATURE . . ...connhi^ T^e owxcr herebv acknowiedses and agrees to mis apphccncn and rarther aumonz-s . entry onto the property by City saff. consultants, agems. Commission memcers. and councu members for purposes^^pfmvcstigaticn sud ygr^mat^t^of diis request. Owxer's Signature ^y Date ^ ^ -------- A^'clictint must have ail submictais into the Cit>' ofrices 2d cays bercrc the Planning CommLsion Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Moedav of mc Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning onmus^o and Council. If an appUcant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please ^e - to have an authorized agent in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning i - this change prior to the meeting. S r “1 C^.* I McDonald iHomes Inc. I) 1^ s I (. N » K ' • u I lints'* Jean Mabu5(h City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box SI5 Orono. NliniKsota 55556-0815 Julv IS. 1994 Jean I am writing to request placement on the agenda of the August 22. 1994 Orono City Council Meeting. As you know a variance was issued to Christine Freeman back in February 1994. which was contingent on a spring hardcover inspection. The spring inspection revealed a gravel "Driveway", which exceeded Orom> hardcover requirements. r u I would like to request an amended vanance from the City Council and Planning Commissi»>n for the following rexsons; .... l i • Because there is little parking area in the driveway, the gravel provides a safe area for guests to park to keep their cars off the street. Overnight guests occasionally park on the gravel since there is little nxim elsewhere. The road curves quite a bit in this area, and it seems reasonable to keep cars off the street as much as possible. Any large utility vehicle will hang out into the street if parked in the space in front of the garage dixir. and this gravel area prov ides safer off street parking if necessary . The homeowner had to replace her garage door recently due to a boat falling off its trailer and sliding into it. Frankly. Ms. Freeman i.s concerned that a similar incident might occur while there is a car parked in front of the garage. • Because of the steep slope from the street to yard level, replacing the gravel w ith grxss or other landscaping would make it impossible to access the yard. The driveway provides access to serv ice vehicles that occasionally need to access the yard and house. Since the distance from the street is so great, it is common for mechanical contractors to have closer access to the house. • Another factor that must be considered is the area it.self. The driveway is surrounded and overhung w ith large shade trees, which do not provide adequate natural light. Growing grxss on a shaded, north facing slope would be very difficult and prone to erosion. 1 realise the concern that the City ha.s of the runoff raintall reaching the lake, but I believe that the water which does not soak through the gravel would be absorbed by the flat grass area at the b*>ttom of the slope. • This situation is a common one in the surrounding homesites. Many of the homes have paved or crushed riKk driveways going from the street down to the house. In this case, the gravel stops about 20 feet to the rear of the garage, instead of continuing down to the house. 1 believe that these reasons show that there is sufficient rea.son to grant an amended variance in this situation, and that by granting a v ariance there w ill be no negative impact to the lake. I you have any questions or comments, please call me at 455-5142. Sincerely. Blake Stranz. Remodeling Manager McDonald Homes Inc. t()20 5cvcnty Fifth Street fast liner (trove Heights. .Minnesota 550 0 (tl2 isv.XI »2 • I .W (»I2 iSS r fiAy ’fi) §?i£t*5 s*#*^*€ OOW »*CAT1^ Nu-f •I'-t - — - »,| » T,« C.H4U3N J» : fC 23* »»«0 8 DAKOTA His so II IS3) Il2 ni) lO^ 4» 0» 9 "x 10 10 SO ^11 so ;aJjl so -2* (lOl yo !U .3^ g n’2‘? )(42),1 ". JL.JSJ I ivingstgn so u — si 1 i! 2 a ^« Jn •1 n‘0= J « ^ p*a (12) o6 (H) 70 id) 60 (9) 50 (a) SO ‘'59 SO 10 —' ■ a" X. JB. *v •r u» •X -JS- pj 14 (16^ 40 (iVi < II i— 20 -y (25)/f Il69/ ti 68/»r • 5 ^ 5 I aJ »r®^ i f*" ic 5? 4? 3i 2 ? (!n (*6)(ol(M) (65) (64) (63) (62) X 4 / X ►/J-PU-a mm un iMn^k/n aMMP mm (Men mn 5« 17*Ur-» 000102200 SMMVMOOO 00 OWtSTINI *000 rOCEHAN CHUSTUC *000 rotCHIH 2200 SNOOVMOOO 00 M*vz*TA m sssn MEfOCOlNl COUMTV OOOOEOTV iNrOOHATION SYSTEM raOPEOTT OMCRS LIST50 17-117-25 *2 too;02252 SMAOYMOOO HI OtCHAOO LEE OOOESN OICNAOe L OOOESM 22J2 SOAOtlOJOO 00 MAVZATA >04 *5591 KOOiT NO. PIA55A01 PAM I50 17-117-25 *2 00050222« SNAOYMOOe 00 HICNAEL PIOICN T1HSTEI ^mCHAEL PIOICM 2220 SmOVMOOO 00 IMVZAT* m SAS91 :• TAMPAVtO SO ir-iir-2S 02 0000 *2210 SNAOVMOOO 00 JAMES • COnOlAW ITAL y'jams 0 oon*mpt 2210 SMAOVMOOO 00 NAYZATA IW SSS91 OMCO NAME TAMPAVtO NAHE/AOOO SO 17-117-2S OS 012S 02250 SMAOVMOOO 00 M N KY JO A J O HEV HILLIAN N HEV JO 2250 SMAOVMOOO 00 MAVZATA »M 55S91 ' SO 17-117-25 02 0005 02200 SMAOVMOOO 00 0 L OEIOCTT SHE OEIWETT •AOOV L A mov ELLEN OCMCTT 2200 SMAOVMOOO 00 NAYZATA HN 55S91 SO 17-117-2S OS 0120 02200 SMAOVMOOO NO OAK OMEN OAVIO S 0N2N ZZ»m SNMYMOOO 00 NAYZATA W« 55S91 50 17-117-25 05 0120 02200 SNAOVMOOO NO ^VELVM S TOOTHAU EVELYN S TOOTMOU 22*0 SNAOVMOOO 00 MAVZATA HN 55S91 M »I a> 17-117-2S OS 0127 02259 SNAOVMOOO *0 M 0 SCNAfEO ACE SCNAPEO MICNAEl A CNKISTINA SCNAFEA 2259 SNAOYNOOO 00 MAVZATA m 5SS91 AMW OMCO NAME TAMPAVCO NAME/AOM SO 17-117-2S OS 0120 02Z05 SNAOVMOOO 00 J 0 SATNEO I K 7 SATNEN JOHN A KATHLEEN SATNEN 2205 SNAOVMOOO 00 MAVZATA Ml 55591 SO 17-117-25 0$ 0129 022S7 SHAOYNOOO 00 D L SCNUOEN ASH SCNUOCO DANIEL L A SUSAN N SCNUOEN 1111 lOUMELL APT 2S7 OOULDCO CO OOSOO SO 17-117-28 OS 0100 02229 SMADYMOOO IM JAY PIEPEO SUSAN A TOOO PIEPEN 2229 SNAOYNOOO 00 MAVZATA Ml S5S91 PNOP mm OM«A NAME TAKPAVEO NAME/AOON total OATCN 001 OOOlZ fc?W''3 MM MTi X,<r- •i.■XMTCM 001P t IV 'L-T >• .« t' i •’ H 1*V >* - ^ I •« ' -il . . »--r j I »• tS y • f '. <• • ? > t *.s .» • . .«■ •• > ‘ :/• I ^ f I I « • U t "I*.• i I ' « -• ■ t \l f:M !♦ '•*r # V .« ^ • k j N ' '-.f * '• ! - ^y a ' 1 n • • f t ' <• V ■ . •■■ r- :.' • I ♦ » * \ f OEMCPXN couwry poopcrtv iNroMHAnm svstw raOKOTT OMCn UST KraOT to.t '.r V. , , t • . 1 CEUTIFV THAT TM£ FACTS RCPRtS£NTtO AW AH ACCURATE AND RERRESCMTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE ®**J[**^^??®*OT the hennerih county oerartheht of rrorertv taxatiw, to the oest or HY WCHLEOGC AND BELIEF. W /v i i. i/I 'lolielim. ml ikisLu)D4TE .'-#C• ‘I *•'l .ri V y » •, ;.0 •tvI♦ .1 -y i’v '■rjrr>J I »b:.i •. * • • g f t .//4f ^ j . * V : f f ' % r f B** -vti- \ i * ;t vr .4* %v - *‘f ) • •• l» ■ • ^ -• * \ .'v ' k: 5 Yt - ' ‘ \$\ . i m‘ ; • t 4 * ).• »• *" » ’’r. ■ 5 ■ \ t . 4 • f> : '•* '•*' X* -rivt-itO'* 1 ^ ..4 r L CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CTTi' COUNCIL NO, 8 3 8 8 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MLTSTCIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1893 WHEREAS, Christine Arko Freeman (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 2240 Shady wood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City ') and legally described as follows: Lot 8, Block 1, Wiley’s Park. Hennepin Count}'. Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the constniction of a 10 ’ x 28’6" addition to the northwest side of the existing residence to be located 6’7" from side lot line instead of the required 10 ’. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1893. 2.The property is located in the LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1/2 acre or 21,780 s.f. in area. The property consists of 16,203 s.f. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 18, 1994, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following hardships and unique findings: Page 1 of 5 1 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE Cm* COUNCIL no._8-3-8_S _____ The house has been placed to the middle of the 50’ wide residential lot and any addition to east or west sides would require a variance. B The proposed cntr>' addition has been placed at the only functional or reasonable location based on the e.xisting layout of the first floor plan. C.The proposed addition will be a single story addition minimizing impact on substandard side yard. D.The neighbor to the northwest receiving most impact from proposed addition has submitted a letter approving the support of the proposed improvement. E. F. The proposed addition will not encroach the average lakcshore setback. All structural improvements are proposed at 13% where 15% would be allowed. G.Hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area is maintained at 3,106.4 s.f. or 24.9%. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 ■ r CITY of ORONO resolution of the city COL^’CIL8883no. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS » ^ nr more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby Based upon on . section 10.25, Subdivisions 6 (B) to permit the requiring approval of a 3 3 or 33siae sciua ^ ^ M. m 1 i. A i>.„. 1. hertbv rUced on notice that if plastic or geotechnic fabric is found u'*'’ ?h nlrffc/re'areL totalling approximately 18.5^. in area that the existence ” would ^ in violation of the conditions of approval of this variance and will reejuire the immcdijtc rcmovsl. ™ ,.«■.( «. d.« «t C^dil » - ■«— -■« expire on that date (February 14, 1995). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the "I)'*" ::™:::i«\“U"amed" a°nd sh'airpunishabie as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned apphcant has read u„ae^ hit"; a'g^s'm ;e'r°ec"o^inf of 'iis're-solution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 r m CITY of ORONO .V RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 8 8 3 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of February, 1994, ATTEST; •orbuiy M. I^alun, City Clerk Edward J. Callahah, Jr., Mayor /} Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of February, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behal of the City. CAAOLE A. HASEMAN NOTARY PUSIC-UMNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY MY ooMyisscN cxRMCS •^zyt Notary Public Page 4 of 5 J CITY of ORONO HESOLtnON OF COLTsClL 8 3 o ------- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 199^4 before me a Notary wilhiM^ for said county . >"d whr«ccuttd day of ___M/LOiA the foregoing instrument act and deed. ;-^ckn^wl"dged that he (they) executed the same as his (the.r) free CAWtE A. HY COilMSSCW notary public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of . 199 before me a Notary rublic knowledeed that he (they) executed the same as hts (the.r) the foregoing instrument, and ac act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 r / i: “1^ C.4LCt.XA-n^V0RKSHEET sItbacs zo>-E= (cmcLE ONT, <ETr 7£-:50'25-500 ’ E2aSIE!&BAEES??^F^^ A. House _ b*-'_2------ ro. “7 Leoftfl & ^ X X X WidiU -L Iw 3. Garags C. Driveway / 3 o X X X 7; 1 1 D. Sidewalk /V3 X X i E. ?ac:o/Dcc!C ao 7 X X F. L-mdscacc UaderUxa 3y Elastic / 2. •r X X X G. Ctiier total H.a RDC0%1^;N ZONE total property aaea in .o _n . ^ , ICO A •>. EE2£2$EE-aA£B£25:ffiJELZ2>i A. House - ----------------- cP , -» widta Lxag^ X X X 3. Garage C. Dnve-vay ' 3 1 LP. Jk r-:.O'' " - \ / / p. Sidewalk /’.-A.X X /O E. ?atio/*Dcck • 7 X X - c s: p. Laodscaoe Ucderlain By piasnc A X X X G. Other total hardcover total property area //7^ 100 A ---^------------- 13 5C0-10C0 ’ 1 c ^S.F. /-?S.F. s.f. —■ S.F. S.F. • XJJ 11.__S.F. S.F. S.F. ^90 ___S.F. S.F. S.F. ■^u S.F. v5T S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. uuJ 5L S- • ■ ’a,-__f. A B /0^'i- <>S.F. /7 C» * id C/ sF-:: s.f. ■ S.F. S.F. __s.f"1 S.F. i >' ^ ' 39<2 p ;'p‘ S.F. S.F. S.F. —------------------------ Cj •* • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. / A 7 A ^. 7, S.F. /gi J’/^^-'tTIs.f. A B -» I ^% 3*^ I j I r L ^ ‘ ^ Jj CALOJLATlOy WORKSHEET ^TTBAC^ONE: (CIRCLE ONE) <>-75’ EXISTING BtARDCOVry IN ZONE A. House ______________ ^ X X X B. Garage C. Dnveway 2Jf,. 1"^ X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic ">X X X G. Ctner TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE pROPOSEP hardcover i>* A. House_______________ Leagcti X X X B. Garage C. Dnveway T 2 <"\ X D. Sidewalk X X E. Pado/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other VM *i i _____ * V. /7/<^ T t 100 - Widl& •2.0 "L tj (,y S/ total hardcover in zone total property area in zone - A ^ B / / P X100 =» 500.1000'r - s^. S.F. S.F. S.F. d . "C*S.F. z^c / T/ • ' t? S.F. S.F. 7.S.F, S.F, S.F. S.F. /Cd. /,S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. /c S.F. S.F A B -* •*. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. dlo. «r S.F. 2_i4 <7 / 70 S.F. -7 S.F. ^ / 7 <r S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • • / 7//. g 5J. 3 S.F. S.F. 14 A B vi) .. t 1 i 1 t i! 1 -— -r __A I# ..<• t Ti it np—T i 4 \ \ •» 1 I V.t 1 :ir;:x FREEMAN HOUSE f7 !li|.'1 1 il :i1' 1 I [ II 111 »r 4> \ipm- I sJ F=He ngp^.. Pwg>N_ SHEET 1 J^i • |>-^4 .’;».#• dM-^ V.;v V*%^^JlijM-,di||.'> M iSMUBki OAVTOM MN MMI *-V '"A ' c* 11 is' • I 2-^0 < ^ o o \ "> / s - i % s ^ \\ N ^ * IV-tn • V v‘**-T _ _'* I ^ W' \ -f* ^<% -f \1 S V) *i *•• SURVEY FOR:Chrt» Freeman DESCIIPTIOS; Lot A, Block 1 WILEY'S park, ““city of Orono, Hennepin, County, MinnesotA o Denotes Iron Honuieents X Denotes Concrete Nail set la Blacktop. Total Lot Area « 16,203^- Sq. Ft. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by ne or under «y direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated tliiji 3rd day of Ma)^ 1993. fncsota License 12267 SCALE: I" Xi4 cajJE^Tiaa4 L,^ r*» A-* 1 \V OoU/7/j /Vo. •Milt (3) TO:Planninj^ Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator DATE:August 4. 1994 SUBJECT: #1953 William Allen. 3475 Livingston Avenue - Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03, Subd. 12 - Separation setback Required =* 10’ Existing = U’± . r • Proposed = 4’ (12" overhang of new addition plus overhang of existing garage creates less than 3’ separation) Variance “ 6* or 60% Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Structural coverage for lots less than 1.99 acres in area Lot area * 6,725 s.f. Allowed = 1.009 s.f. or 15% Existing = 1,179.8 s.f. or 17.5% Proposed = 1,311.6 s.f. or 19.5% Variance = 302.6 s.f. or 4.49% Section 10.22, Subd. 2 Area = 6,725 s.f. Allowed = 2,354 s.f. or 35%' Existing = 1,899.8 s.f. or 28.25% Proposed = 2.131.7 s.f. or 31.7% No variance required Section 10.25, Subd. 6 (B) - Side setback variance Required = 10’ Existing = 6’ Proposed = 6’ • Principal structure addition Proposed = 8.1’ deck Variance = 4’ or 40% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owner ’s List D - Survey E - Detailed/Enlarged Survey Zoning File #1953 August 4. 1994 Pace 2 F - Hardcover Facts G - Existing Floor Plan H - Proposed Floor Plan I • Elevation/Section J - Lakeshore Setback Determination Description of Request H The new construction will extend no further into the substandard side yard than the existing structure at 6 ’. Ihe proposed 12’xl8’ addition will be located less than 4’ from the existing oaraee the grade level deck would be 8 l/2\ Upon your site inspection, note the overhang ot L garage and review Exhibit 1. The U overhang will result in a separation setback ol less than 3’ requiring special fire wall construction. The proposed improvement results m an excess ^ structural coverage at 302.6 s.f. or 4.49%. Structural coverage exists at 17.5.® and will be increased to 19.5%. Statement of Hardship Livingfton Avenue lots designated on the plat map. Exhibit B. 11 or 61 % of the are single lots equal to or less in area. The proposed improvement is similar to the pattern of recent improvement to homes within the Navarre Heights area. Issues for Consideration 1. Is structural coverage excess proposed too great for this property? What of the proximity of other strucnires on the adjacent parcel? 2. 3. Will you approve a separation setback of less than 3’? 4. Should the strucniral expansions be reduced? is the side setback of 6 ’ acceptable as long as it extends no further into the » dard yard? 5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Zoning File #1953 August 4, 1994 Pace 3 Opcioos of Actloii To approve or amend as proposed: or To table providing the applkam with clear directives for review and action at a later meeting. that an amended plan can be prepared - - - ^ - - -1 « CrrY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION 1 y ♦ • t / / Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional vanance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from onginal applicauon) VaS^e fot non<onfonning s<r.cruics CM.OO After-tfce-Facl Fe« (Double applicauon fee) -k-rrrv rcwa t • w*^ ^ V • w -- —r r-tTcrr# c* ] w*%/v»vvvvvVVVV^ ^ . .4 I tt t ■if 2 i?uA *.w*v«v iCV SjOY4iO iiVl V* ( ' lk> * Attach legal description to application if not inciu m (monih/ycar) f r — Preaeni use of property: _y_resideniiai ----- ----------------------------------- Zoning District: PboM (hoinc)_j/2^JliLi£l Pbone(work)___ ritv:Zip: OWNER (H^different man apj)U^^^^^ Address ' PhooeOiome) Phone (work)_ Zip: VARIANCES required Lot Area _ Setback:Front Lot Width Side Hardcover Rear / Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore ___Other (specify)_________________— compliance with Zoning Code requirements.------------ - — 1 (attach additional sheets n necessary) r 1OQC ^ . I • •■ •' mm MTf 07/ivf%iATCII Mt mmmPiH county motcrty infokhation systih pponnjy gmcrs listmmmmn naheTAWAYEiNANi/AOCNI Sa 17-117-ES AS MIA 0SA7t LIVINGSTON AVI C T VftSAILLES IT At ClffSTEII A MELODY VEtSAILLES 3471 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA m S5S91 TAXaAYEII NAME/AODR » 17*117-23 4S M19 03444 LIVINGSTON AVE nUiiC N OLSON ETAL fMm n OLSON 3444 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA rtl 55341 4. MOP ADDi OltCfl NAME TAXPAYEil NAME/AOOt 30 17*117*23 43 00A9 03477 LIVINGSTON AVE H 0 SCNULTE ACM SCHULTE HAPIC 0 SCHULTE 3477 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA m 55341 r I • V. - • ’ '< PMP AOOO QMER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 30 17*117*23 43 0073 0M30 AOORCSS UNASSIGNED «NNEP1N rORFEITEO LAND ORAOLEY J GLEASON PO SOX 52 NAVAME MN 55342 s* « PROP ADM , 4OMER NAME ^ wTAXPAYER \ NAME/AOM 30 17-117-23 43 0074 03444 LYRIC AVE F t i S E MlTTELSTAEDr MRyTIRS FRANK L MITTELSTAEDT 3444 LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55341 * • f t PROP ADM ONNER NAME TAXPAYER ^ TOTAL OATCM > »•*' * • 0 ^ NAME/AODR , » 002 -v’*’ A - 30 17-117-23 43 001703440 LIVINKTON AVE KENRIC N LINOLAN GiORGIAHA CARTALUCCA KEVIN DOE3440 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 5534130 17-117*23 43 004503445 LIVINGSTON AVE OALE K UOCNBCRG CAROLYN h TILLOTSON 3445 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55341 38 17*117*23 43 0070 03445 LIVINGSTON AVE VERA TEETZEL VERA TEETZEL PO OQX 214 SPRING PARR m 55304 30 17*117*23 43 0074 03472 LYRIC AVE ORAOLEY JAMES GLEASON ORAOLEY JAMES GLEASON 4540 ENCHANTED POINT RO MOUND MN 55344 30 17*117*23 43 0134 OffOO LIVINGSTON AVE LAG GOrnZ LUPE A GAIL GOMEZ 3468 LIVINGSTON AVE NAYZATA MN 55341 38 17 117 23 43 0064 03443 Livingston Ave Dennis L Heger Dennis L Heger 3443 Livingston Ave Wayzata MN 55391 Kceoirr Nu. PkU FI4S5401SJS 17-117-23 43 C018 0S4S2 LIVINBSrUN AVt M1UIAH « fVjOCU II I NIFE HIUIAN R HAMCLL II 34S2 LIYINCSTON AVE NAVARRE »tl SS341SS 17-117-23 A3 SOM 03A7S LIVINBSTCM AVE MlUIAH F ALLEN A NIFE NILLIAH F ALLEN BA75 LIVINMTQN AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-fS AS 0072 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXQNEO OEATRICE J HASSON OEATRICE J HASSON C/0 UNIVERSITY HEALTH CTR 22 27TH AVE S E HPLS m S5A1A 30 1-117-23 A3 0075 03AM LYRIC AVE JAMES F MITTELSTAEDT III JAMES F HITTELSTAEOT SIX 3AM LYRIC AVE NAYZATA MN 55391 58 17-117-23 A3 OlAl 03A73 LIVXN6ST0N AVE SARATtlE N ANDERSON SARANNE M ANDERSON 3A73 LIVINGSTON aVE NAYZATA MN 55391 A ', I •A <• "ft •... I!. *4> r‘. ■ ■'*1 CD • 1 • *. L* 1 • ■* . rt A t y..6 » »• \* • . . ‘ i ' • •* « < ' ‘ '1 „ . . ^ \ \ •f V . O «t « ■ . , i } • • • »f * . * *• * • i r ) Pint o<* ?urvo7 fcr Vlll1?n y. AU<^n of nior> j), VTVi’.rr** tl*»lcht^ Honncpin Coiai^”, lUtmcsnta i /,i't^inaz '^ort A*'trn^e vn •n Settle Da to o 1" r. 30' 1.-78 Iron fftirkcr 1 i M ^ c_ Cortirirato nT ?ui->;oy ! I h«’reby certify that this is a true HP.d rerrect r'^pronentation of a aorvey of th« bourulnrica of Lot 10, Block 5, ?hv'rro I'.eluhta, and t>'.e location of ull exlstinc b’Uldlnc?. thereor. It dona not purport to show olh^r Improve- mnts or encrorJch*nr»n ‘.a. (iordon K. Coffin Ref..'Jo' Land Sur'/eyor ".nd Pliinncr Lonn L/tkfs, .‘’iiincaotii 6064 67;:^ 03 i sWSirnmMm wi.'" ’ .■■ T-: * y'V' » - . .1 ; 7," V; 4 - .. , I .• ... .'T*'5LsaK:2M * - - ,. » ... .■ -•:■.•••• •<v:. Hi- ‘’■C .'■••■ *••• ,\■*• ••\' < i.*-’ «.• •’• •« •rfl:i: ;•» ••‘k ..t f,/ V. » ; ■•! ; \ • > •- ‘ * '. *______ JJ. 1. i,!-A«:: <r%- '.■ i'-T" '-v^>ii»»ii::^::S ' .^. '.i !»/£• i 'I't . 'a____ )•"i’Tu i \ V \n % >n 'fe ”?■ *- s VA V>-. > ■; ! Vl i.. t'v^ j\ i. > . ' . VvAc.'^'.- V-'-^ • “f •’■' .. ;*.»•/•.•:* V' ■ I, n » } : - r-' -i^.?: •;> ‘«7v^ ••^i* ^: < * T • •• < . . .vij 'n£»S . . ^■.. £ li ji:- ^.V.•.•'./.r~ -7tv it^.vs' •'. ■. .'''/X \ ^ ^ '• H' NsW . '• • >>' V-;'. * * -t* V -%Vi-1•^ V* ' '»y.* '* ■'"•* t*'‘ I •». ’• -i.« •.y^ Z-H. j .«..■»* • *^;:*.vx^ .V-- ,:-;r. V ^ fc-^ir;>«-■ ■»^V ■'.r-' >*->^ •■ K- . ■ ■ ^ •; ■■mmrn:-- oo t H T>A. I *7^ “P 77MO* /»40 inwiCiw m y’ Va O'* U>4 ' rHc^^ Ml 1 S i • ■ ’. y n -IT"vV'V r - j 3-Vlr^l ^ \r -2 '’ • * ' i ' a .1^ -i I 4 :? •9 J -f- ’ I \f »' •■ .♦ ■ •4' i»p Vx ■ ■ V -. «*.A •. l‘-v»'%r;** -X ' . / ■ ‘•u •\ » r-.'liV ; ■ ►. ■ ‘ - :mf '- .••..v:4~:.v''-,v.::- ,f t \'J‘'V >.'• 1 I'- ' *,’ J»V,* fe; / ^-1 S)T^‘ , ^ Sf- S- S'" : i «• 1 Ki ^ • t m — *£ ^ J R 1 Kl >-0^ w vJi 1 V ^1 ««» R TTfrrg^l 1« ■r«rrr> k**i|iij "5% Vp^"! « 's ■] 3UUVAVN ^ Kl 5 'R SI JS T>ti SXl - jii ~ r^ ^3 R i flis;**' ran^Efe * Till r" " i--. " S*^P 39 ii^l ^i?r^ ►» C3l ^A7fi l{ »zi J0'i9l •:<- ;i ( ii J I- Vk Ml .«L A gjfi HliKM Ttr ,jAV— Citl l.lt.^0.91 0*/ “wr •.8 % S f|{ (9 Ifl liP.<2® “9»i0* ! A 6i« ‘M. ® : %-5 H OW ■ »?.;** «i4r - A______ ’ w d !i» -r# /C Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Augiist 4, 1994 #1954 LawreiKe D. Elsen, 2879 Casco Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Lakeshore setback variance required for privacy fence Required = 75' Proposed = 5’ Variance * 70* or 93% List of Exhibits A • Application B - Applicant’s Addendum C - Property Owners’ List D - Plat Map E - Neighbors’ Acknowledgement Forms F - Resolution No. 3303 G - Approved Site Plan for Application #1833 H - Sunev Description of Request In July of 1993, the applicant received approval of multiple variances to allow a major garage addition and other structural additions to the lakeside of the residence. Applicant was asked to remove a 20’ x 8’ 4" shed at the lakeside of his property, because of hardcover excesses. In the process of removing the shed, the existing privacy fencing along the west/public access side of the property was exposed and found to be ir a severely deteriorated condition. Applicant replaced fencing without a building permit and has reinstalled vines and plantings on both sides of privacy fence. Review Exhibit E, many of the adjacent neighbors reaffirmed the need to replace the former fencing because of its dilapidated condition and potential for collapse. Refer to Exhibit H, hatch marks along the west lot line locate the privacy fencing that nad existed on the property. The new fence is installed within the same location except for an approximate 5’ section that has been installed parallel to the shoreline. Applicants have advised that this has helped to discourage the younger users of the public access from trespa.ssing into their property. The former shed had served th-s purpose in the past. Zoning File #1954 August 4, 1994 Page 2 Statement of Harddiip Please refer to Exhibit B. Applicant's addendum has provided a complete statement of hardships and utiiquc findings. Staff would add that private propert>’ owners who live adjacent to public accesses within our Cit>, specifically the public swimming beach accesses, have installed fencing to define their private properties. The City has approved variances to allow the repair or installation of fencing within the 0-75’ setback area (Cherry Place and Lydiard). Issues Cmisideratk I, Is the fencing necessary ... is the 5’ - 6’ new extension of fencing parallel to the lake necessary? 2. Other issues rais«i by Planning Commission. Options of Action Denial. Planning Commission members should refer to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) (1-12) for the necessary findings and recommend a date for removal of the fencing; OR Approval, as proposed or amended. Approval is subject to applicant obtaining a penalty building permit within 10 days of Council ’s approval. 1 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION.#195 V i • * Li A c :f W'v*fWc '.• ^vT “rr**r,___‘..-••Tr^rvk*. V# • I • r I ^ V *1*# ** I AWWV^WWV*rvVA in.it f'Lrrv Tj Wl «^W«% • |» Initial ApplicadoQ Fes 5200.00 (5*0 00 per each additiorui vanacce; Variaccs for cOQ-cooforming strecoires S-^0.00 ASe:-ie-Fict Fees (Double aFplicouoa fee) f‘1^ KeedfeadoQ ^ ^ ^ icciuded oa reauired siir-'cy. ~Aoach legal descnptioa to^appUcat.oa d noc^u:.. . (mcnch/year) Dace Prepegv Acquired__5LLLa/!—L-l_2— --------------------------------- a the adi«c •fAA .V ^ V* V • v'\- .V (k V V • VV ^"•'k ‘ IT I ^ T*«k TiLi^i k* V i%i*%wwkai »M% luW r.'»C‘< C ’V f* ;; \4 T* .•V' • W W* V W VV A iTv A » 4 J • %' f •* mrnm- r Cdo> fdo nct> also own tife aa/<ceat parcw.s cr lac .1 (00) ^oo^c^ Aio r-sidecdal other soeedy)Present use otpropeny: J^r.siaeniiai ------ Zoning Dismet: applicant . ^ C-, ,-w -i-r- irat rnr- ^.^-r C.CV. Phonefhome) ¥0/ Phoas(worlc) CmU€- 3 _ _______Zip: / 0\\'NER (if differeac than appheant) Name kJ»r ------------ Phoneshoms) Phcce (wcri:)_ Address:Cir/:Zio: Estimated Cccsmucdca Cos: S_description OF REQLTST 0-7755_______ Dejcr.be request indjtaU; f,,,. L cZdX 12 oo^ ■P' / ' > ‘^■'■’!T?lcC:.;^/c:2sbetj7e«erssr^7)(attach additional she; VARIANCES REQCIRED Lct.Aea ___LotV^idth Setback:Front Side '0 Kardcovc; Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore y. Other (specify) _£e-d HARDSHIP.ODESCRIFTTON of unusual pres'cnting ^erfoe undue hardship or pncuosl diffiedr/ or unu^ compliance with Zoning Code reqidrements: /o (attach addidooal sheets if necessary) ^ ^ r REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ^f.iMwin, inforniatioa man h. hmitt.d bv th> appUcgripq jcadljnt dale toitr for vour appliration to ht considered CQqipletei 1. 2. J. 4.■^calculations as required. In addition, prov.de one (1) copy 3/t .t 11 for •i« Tonos^acnic rur.ev fe.tisting and proposed elevations) if any c^ges in eaistmg grade are proposed. In Addition, provide one (1) copy 3'^* .x IK for rcpronuction. a Skex^es or plans of floor & elevation vie'xs ipro- .e one (1) copy a A x II ). 7 e.'^cList’of the l«al names (include piar.tal status) of all persons with an interest in ‘’■'idi- of appiicani(s) u not current owneris). mD. 6. 3. 4^. As'’m'Sje^“;!^n"trtL acptotiom please anacii a separate list of any other persons vou wish nociiicd of this applicition. 9. Additionai :ten:s as may be requested by City starf. The Applicant and Procerr/ Owner must sign this appiication. Please remember that your ..ri.nce nnnlica.inn is 00^ complete if the abqveinfonnation hag npt been include^ ^e**appte^ LrePv* agrees to provide all information required or requested by ae Zoimg SLSst^tor. avrees to pay additional fees (surf tune act covered by ind/or consuiun't e,xpenses incurred in review of this app tcation. and cenmes that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowieagc. Applicant's Slgsg^wSr:_ Date O' S.h ^ Y ^^wxer hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further aut..onzes entry onto the procerty by City staff, consultants, agents. Conumssion menicers. and - members for purposes of investigmcn and venilcation of this request. Owner’s Sigaastfe^— ----------7 ' ^ ~ fhi<; change prior to the meedng. 8 r fb July 21, 1994 The City Council 6 Planning Coaunissioner City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 in response to your letter regarding the fence on reouestina the City's consideration of a variance. This fence is looted within our property lines and provides a boundary and privacy 2/aSd C.r«in Av.nu.. car«an Avenue i. an «=•»• from Casco Point Road down to the lake. Carman Avenue is Presently being used as a public swim beach, an area for P«°ple to park ^heir cars^and bikes, and t. place where people can walk down to the lake. wa Durchased our home in July of 1987 and have never called the City regarding any problems concerning this public area. We f* purchased our house the existing fencing, our shed, and large evergreens along our property line would ^ ^ eliminate any possible problems which could result from living a pUblic arei. Last year we added to and remodeled our home. In the orocess of improving our property, we needed a variance because of hard cover in^the middle zone. The City gave us the variance provided we tore down our 20' x 8'-4" shed located in the ®°'^^hwest corner of the lot down by the lake. We agreed to remove our shed and have done so. After removing our shed, the existing fence became ejPo®®^ was in need of major repairs. We will present pictures of both the new and existing conditions of the fencing and landscaping at ^he meeting August 15th. After examining the existing 5®Ile^;o??ed*out at the posts were not treated lumber and most of them were created the ground. This condition plus many broken horizontal boards created a safety hazard for both the public side and °£.^^^?_^®Jion For this reason, we choose to rebuild the v>n;*rds in lieu of slowly replacing vertical posts and horizontal boa . This safety hazard could cause injury to some person or child create a law suit. Page Two July 21, 1994 This fence identifies to the public where the access is and keeps the public and their pets out of our front yard. Sometimes the kids go so far as to swim on our dock. I guess this isn't the end of the world but who has the liability if someone gets hurt? People that live in the immediate area get on and off the lake with their 4 wheel all> terrain vehicles and snowmobiles. He have no problem with this provided they don't come up on our lawn, bushes, or gardens. This fence again establishes a boundary. He are aware that the city has five different signs up now all over the access road regarding many different rules, but they only work sometimes for some people. This fence is now half covered on both sides with existing 15+ year old grape vines. He have planted grape vines this spring to cover the other half where the shed was. Soon the fence will look entirely like a hedge and its function will be a trellis. Since we moved in, we have maintained this access, such as cleaned up pop and beer cans, glass, garbage, sticks, and seaweed. This year we formally adopted the beach and have installed many bushes and plants, increased the grass coverage, cut the grass and trimmed the trees, plus the normal garbage and seaweed cleanup. He feel we have been a good neighbor and hope the City will understand and approve this reguest for a variance. Sincerely, Larry ‘S Elsen LDE:178 J *.:i> ^i-v.' *'l * ••«;r: •RUN oXtI 05/lVWU.’.• • ■•: I .•j‘ j'f->'.'?! { . ••:■•.•’,•,I ♦ ' 'i •■* ■'■ • •f Jf.: 50 *1 0020 mcnnerin• •!•• • ': •• OROO ROOR ^;.02070 CRSCO ROINT RO “^fOtCR NMff}., T M MMRRCR » 0 C LVOM •rTWAYfR .‘ /-,T000 WttRWR • OtOOlUH IVON C^IttHE/ADOR if-2070'CASCO POINT RO ’ •;'./{• :..* .. <-st;.-!.HAY2ATA MM 55X01 •■• • : ,*• . ^ J '• 0* ’*i A V ?• 7 • ' ’ ’ M«117 . .• % !• X •» • • MO^ AOOH so • 20-117-2X XI 0051 02015 >*CASCO POINT RO . .OMCR NAME ■ R C KAIL A C L RAIC ' TAXPAYER ' RICHARD C RAIL A CAROL I^L . ■ NAME/AOOR'.. 2015 CASCO POINT ROAD . •••• ^0 NAYZATA MN 55X01 • • ft. ‘‘•■s r*i . »• • ► S0 '20-117-2X XI 0050 0 i . »< -i* S ’• P PROP AOOR ONNER NAME • TAXPAYER ’ . V-02070 CASCO POINT RO NAME/AOOR -.• > iv.■ XO 20-‘“ .;4> P00P AOOR [-•! 02000 ' L 0 A K E ELSEN LAMRENCE 0 A KATHERINE ELSEN - 2070 CASCO POINT ROAD NAYZATA MM 55X01, . •117-2X 51 0007 CASCO POINT RO .'i WtlER MANE CHARLES F NELSON A HIFE .tf •••‘i. TAXPAYER 'I- CHARLES A LUCY NELSON - i *. NAME/AOOR; .'2040 CASCO POINT RO “ .1' NAYZATA to* 55X01 ••• i-. »‘ 'yU. .y- j. ...fl -i.vv.?; •• ’•*4' V- •■..-♦J-rv ’• /f Vs-lVfc^ . Vv .* >' . .. y*..’.1^; . M -■ . i- . . . • • V,,'. . y .‘4• ,* • :• ^ " . r.x ’ • .. yov/. . • I- ‘ • * • ’ • t*'' i. > . ' - iT COUNTY PROPERTY INTORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OTWERS LIST REPOIT MO..P1055401 PACESO 20-117-25 51 0025 00050 A00RES3 U»MSSIGNEO T H KNAPPER ADC LYON TOOO RNAPPER A DEBORAH LYON 287A CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55551 50 20-117-25 51 002402500 CASCO POINT RO 0 SIGAFOOS ETAL DONALD SIGAFOOS 2500 CASCO PT RO NAYZATA MN 55X51 .•.r* ‘••• ‘vir'i !>■*■ ■ > •*; I-•r. : *.50 ■ 20-117-25 51 0052 02505 CASCO POINT RO JAMES KENNETH BONERS JAMES K BONERS 2505 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA FM 55551 5B 20-117-25 51 OOSX 02B55 CASCO POINT RO RICHARD C HELSTROH ETAL RICHaRO C HELSTROM 2B5S CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA MN 55551 r 5B 20-117-25 XI 0055 02517 CASCO POINT RO N N MAXNELL JR ETAL NAYNE MAXNELL JR 2417 CASCO POINT RD NAYZATA m 55551 50 20-117-25 XI 0054 02071 CASCO POINT RD J P A R NOLFE J PATRICK NOLFE 2B71 CASCO POINT RO NAYZATA FM 55551 i.-' ••• 1 ■> . .* •' • *' • *. • \ TOTAL BATCH 005 00010 ••V v:!*f -«• :V^ vvr. • ff*cDTTrv THAT TM? FACTS RFPREStMTEO ARE AM ACCURATE ANO TRUE JeSesentation or information OF THE HEWEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEOGE ANO BELIEF. DATE U\UjuJ ^ 11^/• ■: •; " ; ;v. ■ I •*' ' .>‘v-n r r JT'V * y 1 I (we) Adjacelt. Prbper<^- oWef^’ AcWwledgement Form '•/ ___of [prim narK(s)][print address] t #■-»». th<« nrnpcsed irnnrQvenieat or proposed use of the property located CooEcd out I (wo) am (are) awzrr ot *0 ^ e> project or me requires CouocJ approval, rX Procerr/ Owner Dace Procerr/ Owner Dace ,■**»»»*■■***»»•*>»*»»»*•***««»>■««««*iai*«l»*»**^".a****-******* I (we)[print address 1 u :^nrnv—e”C "C oroooscd usc of ±c ptocerc:/ Iccaci ,ove reviewed tte plans for Appiicafioo No. HS^- - V ________siSS3SpSHSS3£SS3s protect or use requires Councu approval. Procerr/ Owxe; Dace Dace t- rw in trie review of dais Lund Use to the scheduled meedng date. J4- '1 c . ■ ‘ /jt^ ! oJ ^ ^ ' ' Adjac^ Frop^ry Owners" Actoowled;ement Form C/ ' [print address] > . 4^~^. * ■» • '^n ^ ^ :rr,nrnve^eat or proposed use of the property located to as Land Use Application No. / 9 S'^tL- finff this ac'cnowledscment. I (^’c) am (are) ."Ot as.^ed lO I (we) undersiand Out m e«catmg tos ac C.p- declare approval or disapproval plans and that the proposed neighbor s Council that I (we) am (are) aware oi me im_^o i-..Le-ey project or use requires Couocd approval. —c,v <m - . « Prccerr> Owner ; r ?-- r> Date Procerty Owner Date « at « a* V *******mMMM <»***»<IM^«***** I (we)[print .naincts)] have reviewed the plans for “ =«-.mg this -^°;':y,"“mere^:''toTo,^^ " t^e'ci“ “l?.atT;tra^r uVelTl P>- ^ project or use requnes Councu approval. print address] Date Property Owne; Date Property Owner • * of this Und Use If you have any informauon that Application, please submit your comments to the Bmiomg he zenmg to the scheduled mcedng date. r 7 / / ;■ t*- 1 - ■ I $ I (wc) pp^p«rty-Own.rs> Acfaiowledgemsnt Form e- ,-.ci.H tmnrove^’cut or Dcocoscd usc of ttc proDcrtY located have revie-^d the pigs for _* P”®,—^ to js Land Usd Applicadco No. I (we) ucde:stacd;jut “'''^'but'inere'ly to coonnn for the^Ci^ .c ,e .eouu.o ----------- . /: '* Prccerr' O'^^ner 7^1/' ^ A Date M » mmm »■ j* j* » » >* mmm !» *»»* I ■ '.ve;[print narnei.s)[pone addressj have reviewed ±e piara for “ ;iif“■ r S3;ihectare approval or °‘ f'/|t-„o«r.=ct olam and that the proposed cet|hbor Cocccti -.at ! .we; am ..are) aware ot t-e anpro croiec: or use requires Couccu accrova.. * ^ Proceriy 0’.-«'tte: Dac£ Date Prcceity O^ne. ^ ^ If you have any infomution '-P^'AppUcadco, piease submit your cemmeuts to L^e bui. s to' the scheduled meeting date. •i-i-Tl .•> .-V'ci3 [prim naine(s)I _______TO [print address) u I ^ for the nroco^ed iauro^’emem or proposed use of mocen:/ located have reviewed ±e plans for ±Lan^ Use Application No-lf?S^X—• 2C ___________________________ ' ^ . . -------------------------- _ T ,_.—\ i’-!-»N '•Of to projtc: or use requires Couccu approval. Date ^ A V^ ’^ate Property Owner a VI w »rnMMmm rnmmm - »***»••»*»»*•* a .ai »»**■• ■ aaw**"**'»»*«»»«• T '(we) _Iprint r.ame;s;Iprjit address] H ;r-''rove-ent or proposed use of the properr/ located have reviewed the plans for j^d Use Application No.-------------• ” ereeuuu. rMs t Se1i “ ceciL-e acprovai or disapproval “Vf''-l"=veT-“ rills aud tdac ie proposed =ei|hbor s Couucu xat I .we) am (are. aware or t_e „cr.vem- . ptojee: or use requires Couccu approval. Dace Property OwTwcr Property Ownner Dace If you have any informauon Offi« at leas: 10 days prior AppUcadom ple^c subtmt ycur ccmmems to l.c Sun . to the scheduled meeting dace. r ^ V • *■ —* ''V -- j : ^/i I (*^’c) Adj^Pro Jiy oSn^’s- A'£isfif-l*d3«^t Fonn ^ [print nan:e(,s)J ^ ^ for th- -ronoscd imorov'caiect or proposed use of ±c pr^cerr/ located have reviewed referred to as Lied Use Applicauon No. Hwe) understand that in ^o^oe^or use'but mere*iy to confirm for the City ^ M m mm * i ^ O V 3. L . Dace'7^/S' /f IaJc^Wc^'^^ '€n\.^M'ekrrU Preperr/ Owner af******"^*** Dace mrnm-mmM'. m » » * * I (we)[prjic nameis)] H :r-"foven’ent or oroposed use of *die procex/ located have reviewed ±e plans tor j^cL Use Applicaticn No. --------__• * I (we) ut:d=rr.a.-.d that it. t.-.e'-adtig this at”Sr=«irto wtSS Tc S'cir/ declare approval or ‘ Councci mat I (wc) am (are) a-var- or a*., nroiecc or use requires Councu approva.. •pnne address] Property Owner Date Dace :err/ uwnc. ^ If you have any inforxnauon i'Zoning Office at least 10 oays pnor Aopacadom please submit your comments to the Bunm.? to* the scheduit d mcenng date. ; fy rr • « I• • V t •>/ ■•! > * - I I (we) Adjacent Property Owners’ AcknowMgetnent Fonn of 7O7C ----------"'[princ address] ■prim amne(s)] ^ ^ -caowledceatent. i (we) am (are) act as.cta to I (*-e) understand dtat in eaecutmg ^oreiy to coni-ima for tne C;^ deciLrrpptovai or ^i-PP-^-'^rL^Sove^cnt pians and that -^e proposed netgnPor s C ^unci2 tnat I (we) am (ace) a-a are 01 - . project or use requnes Councu apptoval. Dac£ Date Procerr/ Owcer « 91 ^»i *i V M mm » y*-^m mm mm' mmmmmmmrn m mmmmmrnm m m »»<!**•«*^ „ W **»»** »*Mmmmm or I (vve)[pane address] [pane namets)] ^viewed the piana tot Aopto^'n No. _--------■ eaecuting thrs ^‘'^“j'jytormeUrto'Stito fo^ feCizy projec; or use requires Councu approval. Date Procertv Ov»xer Dace ^erty Owne7 ^ Lan^ Use „ ,on have any infotmahon om^^Aopneinon, please submit your comments to me b to* the scheduled meeang date. r CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COLTS ’CIL NO. $ ? 0 3____ A resolution granting variances TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE sections 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (Q, SECnON^O.22. SUBDIVISION » ® SUBDIVISION 2 Tjurcnce D. Elsen and Katherine E. Dsen (hereinafter "the applicants-) arT^o^fr; of the property located at 2879 Casco Point Road within the C.ty of O^ airi legally described as follows: refer to Exhibit A, attached (htreinafter 'the property): and 15 5i is allowed and per Secuon 'O-”- • „heVno such encroachment is allowed and setback variance for a °-q . ,|,ack area for structural replacement and new hardcover variances witta ^ 95 hardcover where 5.224 s.f. or 36.7.. stiucniral additions resulong m 5.257.4 s.r. or jo.v, exists and where 25% is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1833. j TP ir Lakeshore Resideniial Zoning District The property u; located jhe property consists of 23.942 requiring one-half acre or 21.780 s.f. m area, in f f s.f. or .54 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission i*°amended based recommended approval of the multiple - P upon the following findings: A. B. 26- X 44- garage addiuon will be placed over existing paved area. Hardcover within the 0-75' setback area has been reduced by 2.4%., Final hardcover at 24 s.f. or .3%. Page 1 of 6 Hrnym r CITV of ORONO RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL *■*>0*^0 ANO. • ••■ 4. C The proposed loop drive with limited backout apron wUl minimize tree removal within street yard. D Installation of the new access drive wUl not result in an excess of hardcover within the 250-500 ’ setback area and will result in 371 s.f. or 12.4% hardcover where 30% is allowed. E. All neighbors notified during this review have been shown the improvement plans and have voiced no objections. The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial proper^ right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIO.NS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03. Subdivision 14 C)^d Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and 2 to permit the construcuon of a 26 x 44 S^Se/siorag addition to the street side of the residence and a two-story 16 ’ x 26 ’ addition at e . the reconstruction of upper and lower decks. This approval is subject conditions: 1. All hardcover removals as shown on Page 5 of this resolution shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction . 2. Any mature planting to be removed as a result of paving improvements sha replanted within street yard. . Page 2 of 6 r CITY ot ORONO RESOLUnOiN OF THE CITY COinVCIL NO. 8 Cf P'‘ 3. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but arc permissive only and must be exercised by application for a bui’diig permit within one year of the date of CouncU approval, or this variance will ixoire on that date (July 12, 1994). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution <hall constimte a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution andonbehalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the Cit>’ of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of July, 1993. 5. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) u ^ TmIv The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 1-th y. 1993 by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin. Mayor and City Clerk of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on be o City. JAMIE LBOSMA Nowrr pusu&MNNBoia HBMaM COUNTY Notaiy/Public Page 3 of 6 hmrnomi CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL o r.NO. ^ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of rj“L/ L , 1993 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared Ltar^nn^ D. El^n^ B. U. known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed ^l^foJ^^ing^ffumcmLSTcknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. CAROLE A. HASEMAN NOTARY AURUC-NYMOOfTA HENNEPIN COUNTY WY coMunot 0,Ctk^NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 4 of 6 I IuimC6XU, //// I /4ffyiM^ fAitK, || I d D O rf| ______JiiMoS insist! r.S 'J ^^-rj^JC#JI££»C •1 3l ^ •----- S%.9^ < t \ hIwJ 1 s !*.•* Lowfm- vgu f HO^fC 401*ti^‘Y # ^ v>>J o<<«*- « to «■ ~»gf^gsjCO A»rH^t u>*^ (“iliijjls*. »/>*«- io Um. Ti,*0 <=<—^ SQO-P" N0(Ut1 ^c^\,€ t !"• ^o»o* -|- p^>MTt.S HetAJtjfNT P(tOpOS6c> »^^vJ m r*vr^ ----------- »joe^<tii»J fg^K<LiT mmiTS /xA-V-Jcove/t.V*«‘UOl/^0 ///it CB •■; -; f.r> CO o^ r CITY of ORONO resolltion of the cm' council NO.V - Exhibit A Legal Description That part of Lot HO, the Southeasterly Sennejin County. Minnesota. put thereof, and sltuat .............. ,nn_i M tot ,01 and the -rthwesterl^/a^ of L»t^ ,00. Jnclud- '5"tair.?lnronra ^d r:df «" th. southeast ^hy "r IryvairMin'oet^^^a z ^curn- K;..V Page 6 of 6 laaiiMMi r To: From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorsc. Cit> Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 3. 1994 #1955 Andrew J. McDermott. Ill, 2702 Walters Port Lane - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Street setback variarce required for screei^d porch to be installed within envelope of existing deck that slightly encroaches required street yard setback. Required = 35’ Existing = 34’ Proposed = 34’ Variance = 1’ or 2.8% Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of structural coverage on property less than 1.99 acres in area. Total lot area = 18,643 s.f. Allowed = 2,796 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,326.5 s.f. or 12.4% No change proposed. Brief Review of Hardcover 75-250’ setback area = 5,675 s.f. based on 5/13/91 review of Application #1633 Exbting = 1,608.8 s.f. or 28.3% (316.5 s.f. or 5.57% landscaped area underlain with unwoven geotechnic fabric was approved by Council as non-hardcover upon the completion of the review of Application #1633) Proposed = 1,608.8 s.f. or 28.3% 250-500’ setback area = 12,918 s.f. Existing = 2,495 s.f. or 19% Proposed = 2,495 s.f. or 19% (allowed = 30%) List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners ’ List Zoning File #1955 August 3. 1994 Page 2 D - Survey E - Hardcover Site Plan F-1-3 Hardcover Inventory G - Framing Plan ■w H - Elevation I - Orono Council Minutes 5/13/91 J • Orono Council Minutes 5/28/Ql K - Council Action Notice 5/31/91 L - Resolution No. 2%3 M - Floor Plan - Application #1633 N - Orono Council Minutes 6/24/91 Brief Reriew of Request In May of 1991, the applicant received approval of setback variances to the rear lot line for a three season porch, a bathroom addition and a deck/walkway connecting three season porch with north side deck. All the improvements were kKated within the 250-500 ’ setback area of the property. Hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area was inventoried at 33%. The applicant was required to remove some 316.5 s.f. or plastic underliner beneath a landscaped area as a trade-off for the improvements within the 250-500 ’ setback area. Hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area was to be reduced to 1,608.8 s.f. or 28.3% . During the review of that application. Council considered the use of a geogrid fabric as a replacement for plastic underliners in an attempt to control weeds. Council deemed this to be less objectionable than the use of chemicals. At the May 28, 1991 meeting of the Council, unwoven geogrid fabric was approved as non-hardcover. Applicant was advised of the Council’s decision and removed the plastic underliner within the street yard and installed unwoven geogrid fabric. As applicant installed the geogrid fabric with the approval of the City (refer to Exhibits I, J, K and N), this area of hardcover was not included in the current hardcover inventory for the 75-250’ setback area. The current application involves the installation of a screened porch within a portion of the existing deck (refer to Exhibit D). Unfortunately, a portion of that deck encroaches the required 35’ street yard by 1’. As the deck structure is to be intensified with the installation of a screened porch, the applicant was asked to file a setback variance application. No other variances are required. Statement of Hardship Please review Exhibit A. r Zoning File #1955 August 3, 1994 Page 3 Issues for ConsideratMMi 1. 2. Are the hardships or unusual findings presented b>’ applicant valid? Will the structure have any impact on adjacent residences. Refer to Exhibit B, there is no impact upon an average lakeshorc setback nor is a lakeshorc lot ’s view of the lagoon or lake blocked by the proposed screened fH^rch, 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission members. Options of Action Approval as proposed or amended, subject to any conditions determined necessary by the Planning Commission. CITY OK ORONO - VARIANCE AFPEICATION Initial Application Fee S200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original applicauon) Variance for non-conforming smicturcs 5*C After-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Propeny Idendficatioo Numt«r (P.l.D.) X> - 1>~1 -~'^^■C'C*3£X dcscripcioc .0 appucaaoo ^jcgu.cd survey. DattProperty Acquired^___________wVAS 1^ C2-I—------------------- I (^(do not) also own adjacent parcels bt Imd.____ k ■ \ 0 C1T7 lF 0^0 •* ' r A1’,* ^ »‘w - J* ^ W ^ ,^ 0rn^ikm v» • AUU. I j Cv^vvvvv _ , f I u V VA 200. i!-. 200.0- V- V I / Present use of property: X_rcsidential Zoning District: other (specify). Phone rhome)^ ~| I ------ APPLIC/^T ^ iAcr^« f Phoocfworic)T C.m.r'ZJ^ Name ' Klin ^ KAM Z.p-^^TVrlrr-r Vr? Vlri If’" UM^-ity- ' OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_____ ■ C^IA£. Phoneihomc). Phone (work) Address: description of request __City: _______^*P---------— Estimated Constmenon Cost ^'5,SQO.06 DtoC.Kir «v*-viw^w- : „ . v„u«. « —- ••tback (f«« *lt« plan). Lot Area Lot Width X Setback: _X Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRjroON OF ^jSU^ PROP^J^CO^ Desenbe undue hardship or practical difficulty or uu f ^ Du. CO th, location of the axlatlng dock which was I purch...d ch. prop.ccy; th. h^.r^^^ard* current floor plan and limited obtrusive to the site and This Is Che only location where It will be the lease neighbors. Again only on. snail corner will V”r/'rs^ocuLo^^^ “a^mJ« r‘h. *hr^cl''h*”sr'.‘c''r*o“.7 rUrtL^nsrrucrad In l,.l U only U f..t from the same road. f ^wu n. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS '7 ^ All of tfag following information must be submitted bv the application dCiKihpedjtc m,fl,rder for vour aijipHcation to be considered complete; 1. dm. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department ol Finance, A*603, Govt Center, 348-^2/1). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8li x 11 for reproduction. ... . Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes m e.xisting grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/^" x ll” for reproduction.^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy Sin' x IT). List of the legal names (include mantal status) of all persons with an interest in the property This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current ownens). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons 9. you wish notified of this application Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Properrv Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your vnnnnce aDpUrarinn is not complete if the above information has noLbeen indude]l APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE .. u u 7 <, The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant e,xpenses incurred in review of this application, and cenifies that the information supplied is true best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature Date 7 // H OWNER’S SIGNATURE # . , The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to tms application and further authorizes reasonaole entry onto the property by City staff, ^nsultan^. agents.^ Commission members, and Council members for purposes of and^eriiication of this request. Owner’s Signature /- J----------------Date Applicant must have all subnv4ls into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Cotmtusston Meeting Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third .Monday ol each month. AnnUcants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planmng Commission and CouncU. If an appUcant is unable to anend a scheduled meeting, please make anangMents to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advUe the Building & Zonmg Office ot this change prior to the meeting. 8 r %r» UJ CL c in *•1# /C • r LyDI a Sd ^cI^ TT7T *.» (II) ::____ ifo 'SL ac n ( 12) »(») Z^’>4 If5T <>« -. ff ot LC’ I 1^AUC Su5C 3>!A (I) 0 » 33 S'(37) I 2i: 4 (26) '° «; (55) ^ 2^ 9 9 ^ j'yit (27) if9 ■& L (9 (34) ./6 ^ c (10) , (28) J------ 7 - •/ 1 (n) 9 1* *1^ ~1 • K, (21) 2£LI :7.’t ‘■It- (AO) !■*;. s »^o* 17:. 5« /' •0/ (A2)^ 2- I 3 - ) /#■ « ISJ(43) &“ n? 5 (24) > /I r;s R (45)■^vo: • V. ✓'c. j/ 5, ^ (51) r; c :s rr y IC" 10 ? (25) ... '■»•, - i 5 =1 ^ Va >4C ? e mm 9^ tri 4f * j' « A - 134. 34 I n /*- Cf ?A r* ( 5)^Arr 0^ •.0" !0 : (7) 421 • 5 2 (1) ..■7^f , 9- '/ J87 3 • • GOVT LOT 5 1 iUN MTC 07/lf/9%H£!#€PIH COUKTY PHOP€KTY INfOmATION SYSTTH PROPERTY OliCRS LISTUTCtt 003^ PROP AOOR* ONNiR KAMI TAXPAYER V . HAME/AOOR•\ • V V 30 21-117-23 23 002002745 KELLY AVE RAJ STENART RONALD C A JEAN C STENART 2745 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55331^ PROP ADOR ONNER NAME ‘ V' TAXPAYERNAME/AOOR 30 21-117-23 23 003402710 KELLY AVE LEE R NUTKELNITZ LEE R MUNKELMITZ 2710 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR m 55331r 1. ^ .. PROP AOOR OlfCR NAME TAXPAYER ^ NAME/AOOR ' i 30 21-117-23 23 0041 02444 KELLY AVE DAL UPNOFr DARYL L A LUCY S UPHOFF 2444 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 «r • •X‘V,.. 'ii-. > V W90^ AOm ^ OMCR HMCI ' V TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR • I 30 21-117-23 23 0051 02710 PENCE U DEAN E TERRY DEAN E TERRY 2710 PENCE LANE EXCELSIOR m 55331 f'-jtV , * * !v •• • ■ **nry V * ^"• : xiv- •> ■ • f » , ** i w ^ . .\i » . A >• * A* 4 > r \ 0» I ; i; • ■ •» t » % 30 21-117-23 23 002402701 PENCE LA P J RANDALL A L K SE6AR PAUL RANDALL A LORI SE6AR 2701 PENCE LA EXCELSIOR MN 5533130 21-117-23 23 003402702 HALTERS PORT LA ANDREN J MCOEmOTT III ANOREN J MCDERMOTT III 2702 NALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 23 0042 02703 HALTERS PORT U HILLIAM N REESE JR A NIFE HILLIAM H REESE JR 2703 NALTERS PORT LANE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 TOTAL BATCH 003 00010 4 *REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 530 21-117-23 23 003302700 KELLY AVE R B RICE A 0 b RICE RICHARD B A DEBORAH 0 RICE 2700 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR Itl 5533130 21-117-23 23 004002701 KELLY AVET R A H H STORLIETED R A HENOY HEINE STORLIE2701 KELLY AVEEXCELSIOR MN 55331 30 21-117-23 23 0043 02705 NALTERS PORT U D J BELL ASK NESELY DOUGLAS BELL A SUSAN NESELY 2705 HALTER'S PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE AND BELIEF.. » A ^ DATE y \'i • •u•a r: • •Vf« -4. ‘ i • ’ . s', ■ i J « i • * > .4 ■ •r # ♦ * V •!-. • 4 ■■' "f-:- ’ * \ I •' i ‘'•A'' ! ** • k r Cert if I cat# of Survey f or WcTer«iott Of lot I. fleet I and Outlot 2. Walters-Port Henr epln Count/, ninnesota ./z ^iiiipvao 1 . f ‘.i P • / 1 / i ti Date 4-29-a7 Scale. I" • 4G 0 ; Iror narker Jucicial Lancnart Spot el<»vdticn »drn uroi^Lerg M-t. No. U/5o Engineers. Land Surveyors. Planners Long Lake. Minnesota r XlO'^ V-lAi^T(LA^ Po*\r HARDCOVER CALCLXATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ EXISTINC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. Houx 25-500’500-1000' I Cj X X X Widih 2.5* S C. Driveway 2H Li X i c D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Dedt X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plasnc X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER LN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A IL,Ofc.‘6 - B , PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZOSZ A. House _____________ X L4Q|^Width % X X B. Garage C. Dnveway X X D. Sidewaik X X E. Pacio/TDcck X X F. Landscape Uoderiain By Plastic X X X ss s G. Other (IM .3 s!f1 S.F. S.L TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ________ B _X 100 = 13 MO U .MuO S.F.. 1 }r.5 a>«■ O S.F. 1 u fs 1 O ok“XH ’’ 6 rFz 3 «■XI S.F.-lift13 2 l(.S.Fr- S.F. • S.F. S.F. m S.F. S.F. 1 1 b OS,^S.F. ( C A •...U1 ^3.S.F.B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. I S.F. S.F. % A D \ r HARDCO'TR CALCULATION WORKSHEET 75-250 ’ ? SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 ’500-1000 ’ F.yiynNC hardcove r in ZONE A. Hotue IS I i 1- X X X WidA — I \ i b B. Garage C. Driveway &*(r> M Ax X X D. Sidewalk TTT X X E. Patio/Deck 1 I" X X F. Landscape Uoderlaifl By Plastic 5 t«. c>X X G. Otter TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY IN ZONE , ^ ^ „ A M ^ s - B _ t 100r ppnPOSED hardcove r in ZONE A. House ____________ * LesfT&Widch X X X B. Garage C. Driveway ✓ D. Sidewalk E. Paiio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVTR IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZON'E ^ ,^0 A ® ____ — 13 ^ OH ■ b sj. l-SL.O 1.LO.Q I («S.C S.F. S.F. t 1 CCs .0 GC* ^ S.F. lb^^.1 S.F.’ S.F. S.F. S.F. n.s-S.F. H b S.F. Xl>S.F. nn.CX? .S.F. A * 1 , $.£^/ ' ISO _S.F. S.F. S.F. A.. A 1 X S.F.B %« S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % i i A B IT i * • * ^ • •■ , -, ••.'-» * ■ —• -I •rov^T / > •«I'<U;V 9 fs ^ \ ir'-ln-'V. f/♦- ’5=5>' ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1991 1: (#7)ZONING FILE #1631-HOMMEYER CONTINUED originally granted November 2.1, 1987. passed. All voted a/e. Motion (#8)ZONING FILE #1633-ANDREW MCDERMOTT 2702 IIALTERS PORT LANE VARIANCE-RESOLUTION #2963 Andrew MoDennott was present. Bernhardson reviewed the ii^sues involved w.th Mi . McDermott's Variance request, as outlin.»d in Jeanne Mabusth's April 13, 1991 momo. He noted that the Planning Corfunission recommended approval of this application. Goetten stated that h.irdcover in the 75- 250 foot setback ar-a exceeds what is allowed. She indicated that she would like •co'see the 5.57% of landscaping plastic removed in light of the McDermott's request to add hardcover to the property. ofCallahan stated that e::cess hardcover, in the form landscape areas with underlying plastic, is not allowed and is to be automatically removed. Goetten anreed with Callahan, and noted that the Pi.anning Commission had not included removal of the landscaping plastic in uheir recommendation for this application. McDermott statod that his improvement plans do not include any improvements within the 75-250 foot setback area. Goetten indicated to Mr. McDermott, that in her opinion, a recuest to remove 5^ e-:cess hardcover fcom the 75-250 setback arsca was not asking too much, and would bring the hardcover percent closer to the 25% allowed for that area. Jabbour concurred with Goetten. r.t was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #2963, as amended, to include language requiring the applicant t-> remove 5.57% hardcover from the 7‘j-250 foot setback area. Jabbour requested Staff to bring back for Council s review information depicting alternatives to landscaping p.astic taat may be acceptable from a hardcover standpoint. All voted aye. Motion passed. (#9)ZONING FILE #1635-JOHN O'SULLIVAN/ERWIN SMITH 2420 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE-COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN-RESOLUTION #2964 John O'Sullivan was present. hernhardson pcovided a brief e.cplanation of the request to place an addition onto O'Sullivan'c Service Station. - 3 - 9 3 $ L ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 23, 1991 (#8*JZONING FILE 11643-DAVID J. NELSON 740 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH renewal VARIANCE-RESOLUTION #29G7 ro*—to adoo- to permit the construction of an attached two sta . . - Willow Drive South. All voted aye. Motion passed. (»9)HARDCOVER STATOS OF MEED CONTROL FABRICS n.„-.ture ^‘f'on presented Council with- a variety of lite.ature reoard^M weed control fabrics. He also distributed several regarai g tvpes of woven and non-vjoven weed conurol f^b?icL He stated that the non-woven fabrics have a Mrmeabilitv range of 10 to 100 times that of woven fabrics. H^rdded that the local garden centers sell both non-woven and woven varieties. Gaffron =“59ested that it would crea« a mr-ohiAn, f’'0'Ti an enfotcement standpoint, :f Councix ogreea allow the use of non-woven versus woven fabrics, but by doing so^ ti will tell the residents that the City prefers non-woven over /an f^thrics Also, certain fabrics, manufactured other uses, have been treated with various chemicals and/or resins that will'make them impermeable and those should not be use . Jabbour indicated that he would like to percent of water will not pass through permeable fabric and uoe that percent when figuring hardcover percentages. Gaffron advised that there are various methods of testing, ’'-os- tests involve a falling or constant head of water focused on SSo fiLf r;;,c^h!^ ,^GT^”h‘sa!i., -r=a-h;r:5i;y^££eb|^ gLll^nV°per minute^'''^From^ jlTt"^ reading the ^^^^va^iois will be nearly impossible to determine how each of the various products have been tested." r^llahan asked why Council is considering a revision to t.he existing Sardcbver Ordnance, which doea not allow permeable fai" ■ ic. Jabbour replied, "People want a method weeds, and most will use plastic. When we find j is being used under landscaping, we ask to have it removed, ihink it would be beneficial for everyone if we provide an will help keep weeds down. they m\^r^;^ifefy U to%o^i:r^i‘=«:d%^^"'^=' - 9 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD flAY 28, 1991 J the qrour.a should not be classified as fd ;«eh Jabbour that offering the riayor Paterson ‘'*„ould^ benefit residents a viable “-'^/i'/'Ault for Staff to find every bif of stated that it would landscaping. It is r.u=h better to iuow'the «e "abnc, Than to have plastic everywhere. _4T fabric will not autonrticauy ^0'«a‘re^e!4-"w?u'-op*using chemicals. coetten >9reed wjth_dabbour and Mayor -«rson_that aUowing the use of non-woven fancies wouj. Butler reiterated penetrate^ as^^hardcoVer. classify anything that allov;s w someone cover portions of She said, "I would ”uch ^..,ter to run through, than ^S*i%h"ef hi“re a -Mpany \o cone out and spray everything. ^ Bernhardson asKed ''hotter the fro^^tbed'sV''’' penetrate at the sane rata it it is xo a that the fabric functions best when it is In Gaffron advised „sed to being in open air. contact with the ground, as oppose . a that it is unlikely that it will eve. Bernhardson stated that it 'f even the woven rain hard enough o„ 'up to 25 gallons of water per fabrics, which typically al.ow p minute to pass through. . u a. c^isf^'a recomnendation specifically states Butlor noted that Stafi. £_tiric She questioned uhother a ^-rl'rcliorshrld°ie"r^brtw=^^^- and ^noh-woven. Oaffron stated ^ that P.hough it .^1 woulfb^ Ter^to^^^" - r^resi'drts^of^tl;e best solution. It was moved by Butler, seconded ^by °°sPten^-^ current hardcover policy t° ®l^doover when placed below dean, permeable landscape rock, directed to update the landscape beds. Further, Staff__is__^^current hardcover 1 n^Sso^pe bedr“^' -^-;VochlVe “ to^%e11e=r current ''hardcover plucy!"^lPdor Aye°s-4 . Callahan. Nay. Motion passed. \ \ % t - 10 - ( » i v-r . . k*. r t APPLICATIOll NO. 1632 CITY OF ORONO P.C. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 MOTICB OP COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 5/31/91 TO: Andrew McDermott 2701 Walters Port Lane Excelsior, MN 55331 COPIES: TYPE OF AFPLICATIOII: Variance DATS OP MEETING: 5/28/91 VOTE:For Against «CIL ACTIOS - MOTlOSt Council voted to allow the use of geotechnic fabric as an acceptable rethod of weed control and shall not be considered hardcover. The type of fabric approved for use shall be UNWOVEN rather than the woven fabric. As of the meeting of the 28th, you would now be allowed to replace the plastic underliner within the landscaped areas of your property with a geotechnic fabric as long as it is an unwoven type. Please contact my office if you have further questions. The Building Department has already been notified of Council’s action. cc;Lyle Oman, Building Official Bruce Vang, Field Inspector Isv -M-h-ij 1 X • t i ^ I u O o CITY of ORONO ^ H \ 'v\ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2963 _ csw A RBSOLOTIOM GRAHTIHG A VARIANCE TO municipal soning code SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) PILE 11633 MBBREAS, Andrew J. “a\e'd 0 applicant-) la the ^ ^o^ono (hereinafter -city-) and Port Lane within ^ 1 a„d Outlet 2, Walters Port, il^neVYn‘‘c" property-), and WHEREAS, the ®PPj^®®"^jgYectloVl0.24,*^Subdivislon 5 variance to f^ ,^2%13’ three season porch to be (B) to pers.it r„tead of the required 30', alocated 8' from the rear lot li.« instea7•x8^• liathroos. addition to be located 10 fro instead of the te^uired 3o an^^ to ^rlo«\’‘^l\8-Tr%"m « lot line instead of the required 30’ . HOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoninq File *1633. _ Wh 2. The property is oVstri^ct^requiring^l acre in a?erflr%ach"tesldlotill lot. The property consists of 19,343 s.f. or .44 acres. '■ im "and^ re°^J-.s ”"dTd varJince based'upon the following findings: The unusual shape of the lot B) The existing iioob P^- iroSf ?h\'°w"es? Sj%larsfSt addition requires expansion along of structure. Page 1 of 4 < I! O O ,'kV* 'SVt'VX (S' -'\\^ >1 < r ^ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL v''NO.296 C) The house has encroached into the 30' rear setback area for 23 years. Whereas the principal structure was placed 11* from the rear lot line instead of the required 30*. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions^ lightf air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant^ but 1s necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of t:.e City. 5. The City Council has considered this application Including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comn'ents by xle applicant and the effect of the variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLOSIONSr ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a three season porch, 6' wide deck/walkway and bathroom addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall remove 316.5 s.f. or 5.57% of plastic underliner within landscape area located within the 75-250' setback area prior to the footing inspection by the Orono Building Inspector for structural additions to the residence. Hardcover within the 75-250' setback area shall be amended to 1,608.8 s.f. or 28.3%. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (May 13, 1992). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of 4 ^04.o o \ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2963 X. 4 The undersigned applicant has read, to the recording of thi. resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council ° 1991'Mi^esota at a regular meeting held on the 13t ay o » roperty/OwnerIs) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of «ay, ®“fcUy‘of*Or”^^ a MYnnei^oti: r“ipal”cLVa«on^"nJ'la\l^n\\'^^^^^^^ was executed on behalf of the City. ’pSuC •Tm” neIota Page 3 of 4 r O O CITY of ORON .:*> A,-‘^ 4* STAT^A»oI4MJIiBS0T ) ) 3S. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -^63 COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of K~KlQ ■■. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _> ^^fJ- before me a, Notary Public within and said coi^ty, personally appeared TXv^^Pi.y T nin LL iHZ, ^ ^^'rye k- ,_ known to rnTt o be tne Pe^som s Pdescr H”t°he^) ex ecu tedforegoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executea the same as his (their) free act and deed. Ix X ll^o^ f!P\ /f NOTARY PUBLIC THERESA L NAAB MOTAMV PUBLIC • MINNESOTA HENNEf N COUNTY Ml, oaounia' ■ •<«oir*» 9^C2 MY C0WJ'!I!= iUW *'t!Xf i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this ' 199_, before me a Notary Public~ithin 2nd for said County, personally To be tine oerson ( s ) descr ibed Tn and wnc execu ted foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) execute the same as his (their) free act and deed. notary public MY COMMISSIONEXPIRES Page 4 of 4 -3HrfT I f A7C OffHHarr z>«x p«4r IV, <XOVd » AfV. 7i?r-»rr^ _ LOCATION ON s *^‘-£ K* ,<vo- r ORONO CITY COOTJCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1991 \ («7)SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONTINUED would recommend that the property owner apply to the City for a permanent sign that would provide the ability to display temporary advertisements. The main focus of this Ordinance Amendment is to discourage the use of the yellow, bread-board type signs throughout the business areas. It is the consensus of Staff and Planning Commission that these signs are aesthetically undesirable." Jabbour commented that John O’Sullivan had been present at the Planning Commission meeting when the Public Hearing on this matter was held. < Bernhardson asked Mabusth if Staff had notified the Merchants Association of the particular language proposed for the Ordinance Amendment. Mabusth replied, ’*1 believe John O’Sullivan understood what was being proposed. The Merchants Association provided me with some final input. As I understand it, the amendment met with their approval. They were mainly concerned about the existing Ordinance which allowed only one temporary sign every 24 months. There was one business owner on Wayzata Boulevard who did not approve of the aspect of the four signs per year applying to all of the tenants within one building. To that property owner, I would recommend a permanent sign, that would provide flexibility for advertising." Jabbour asked Mabusth in what capacity John O'Sullivan was present at the Planning Commission meeting. Mabusth stated that he was present on his own behalf for an application pertaining to an addition to his service station, but then stayed for the Temporary Sign Public Hearing and represented the Navarre business owners. She asked Council if they would prefer to have the area merchants review the proposed amendment prior to Council action. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to table this item until the Orono business owners have reviewed the proposed amendment. All voted aye. Motion passed. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT: (#8)HARDCOVER REVIEW OF FINDINGS Mabusth advised that at the June 17, 1991 Planning Commission meeting, Charlie Kelley raised the question of whether Council intended to allow the use of non-woven fabric within the 0-75 foot setback area, and if so, to what degree. Goetten stated that she had been of the understanding that when Council took action approving the use of non-woven fabric, - 6 - ( C r j- D # # OROHO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1991 Ti®)bardcover review continued that the approval was of a conceptual nature and nore detailed standards would be discussed. She indicated that she would like to have rcore definitive standards incorporated into the Ordinance Anendnent, and suggested referring the issue to the Planning Commission. Butler stated that Council may wish to prohibit use of the non-woven fabric within the 0-75 foot setback area. Mayor Peterson stated that she, too, was of the understanding that some restrictions would be incorporated into the Ordinance Amendment. She added that she had not intended to allow the use of the non-woven fabric within the 0-75 foot setback area. Callahan, who had voted against the motion to allow the use of non-woven fabric, indicated that his understanding of Council's action was that non-woven, geotechnic fabric, v/ould not be considered as hardcover. Jabbour suggested assigning a certain percentage for which non-woven fabric would be considered as hardcover. He said, "If we assign as certain factor to the non-woven fabric, we can more easily control the e.'ctent of its use. If it is considered as even a fraction of a percent of hardcover, it cannot be used in the 0-75 foot setback area at all, as we do not allow anything there." He asked Gaffron to comment on his proposal. Gaffron indicated that he would prefer that a hardcover factor not be assigned to the non-woven as it would further complicate an already complex calculation, that from experience seems often impossible for anyone but City Staff to do correctly. He said, "If it is Council’s wish to have nothing but trees, shrubs, and grass within the 0-75 foot setback area, then that should be stated, though there will be numerous Variance requests." Mabusth noted that geotechnic fabric has been used as a method of stabilization for steep, eroding banks along the shoreline. Callahan stated that for the most part, the requests that have come before Council involving landscaping plastic has had to do with its removal as a trade-off for the addition of hardcover elsewhere on that property. He said, "I do not recall an instance where someone has requested a Variance to install landscaping plastic. It may be appropriate to establish a policy stating that non-woven fabric cannot be used as a trade-off for other forms of hardcover. It was the consensus of the Council that this issue should - 7 - ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1991 (#8)HARDCOVER REVIEW CONTINUED be reviewed by the~Planning Comnission. Kelley asked Council what policy will be in effect in the interin. Callahan suggested leaving the pre-existing Ordinance as is (which states that any weed control naterial, plastic or fabric, is considered as hardcover) until an appropriate anendnent is recoEomended by Planning Commission and adopted by Council. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to rescind the Ordinance relating to non-woven fabric until such time that an Ordinance Amendment is drafted and adopted. All voted aye. Motion passed. Gaffron noted that in light of the action previously taken by Council, he knows of several people that have installed non-woven fabric on their property. Council stated that they could foresee no problem with the existing situations. Staff was asked to continue urging people to use the fabric, as opposed to plastic. but with an understanding that during the interim period of fine tuning the ordinance amendment, the fabric will be considered hardcover. OTHER Mayor Peterson stated that she would be meeting with Betsy Swartwcod, Mayor of the City of Long Lake, to discuss some of the issues of mutual concern for both cities. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: (#9)STUBBS BAY SEWER , Bernhardson presented Council with information pertaining to the issues of financing the project, further engineering work that should be done on t.he project, and the areas to be included in the project. He said, "The City could opt to contribute a certain amount to the cost of project, which would defray the cost to the individual residents. However, there is really no way of knowing what degree of financial involvement on the City's behalf v/ill make the project acceptable to the residents. Would the City consider a request from the residents to defray the project costs by 50%? The City could either determine a certain percentage of participation and ask the residents if that would be acceptable, or ask the residents for input as to what they would consider to be an acceptable level of City participation." Butler stated that it would be difficult for the City to indicate its willingness to pay a certain percent of the project costs, because the project costs are not known at this time. - 8 -f r To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono CouiKilmcmbers Ron Moonc. City Administrator Fran: Date: Subject: Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building & Zoning Administrator August 10, 1994 «956 Tom ami Ch:i« Smieja. 4M0 Waiortown Road • Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1.Section 10.02 - Definitions. Det-mition 35 ■ Lo. comer. A lo. situated at the jumttion of. and abutting on mo or more intersecting streets. line of such public right-of-way shall be the lot line. . I- . rrmni Th boundatv of a lot which abuts an existing or "'SSt^Rui," “nd r^o? a comer lor it shah be the shottest dimension on a public street. The lot line adjacent to Orchard Park Road would be Ute front street lot line for a determination of required setbacks. maximum distance from the Iront lot line. The rear lot line would be approximately . lO' from -he point at the western side of the property. Definition 41- Lot line side. Any houndaD of a lot which is a mutt ,o. line or a rear lot line. The northern lot line is the only side lot line for .he proper^r 2. Section 11.03. Deftnition^d "d PaS Zd Z'wSow°n Adjusted lot area = 55.900 s.f. or 1.28 acres. i i J Zoning File #1956 August 11, 1994 Page 2 3. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of sinictural coverage Total lot area = 55,900 s.f. or 1.28 acres Allowed = 8,385 s.f. or 15% Existing = 1,743 s.f. or 3.1% Proposed = 2.501 s.f. or 4.47% 4. Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) A. B Front/street setback Required = 100’ Imposed => 100+’ No variance required. Side street setback Required = 100’ Existing = 30’ Proposed = 38 ’ - principal structure addition Proposed = 25’ - three season porch addition Variance = 75’ or 75% C. Side setback Required = 50 Existing = 42’ Proposed = 45’ Variance = 5’ or 10% List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners ’ List D - Survey E - Weekman Memo 9/3/94 F - Floor Plan, First and Second Floor Levels G - South/street Elevation and Basement Floor Plan n - North/East Elevations Description of Request The applicant proposes a 26’ x 48’, Vh story addition to the east side of the existing residence and a 16’ x 14’ single story three season porch to the west side. The property is of Zoning File i<fl956 August 11. 1994 Page 3 a triangular shape and equals approximately 1.28 acres in area and is subject to 5 acre zoning setback standards. The additions require a street side setback variarare and a side setback variance. The structure will e.xtend no closer into the side yard as existing sirucnire is 42’ from the side lot line. The proposed ikw addition at its closest point will be 45’. Ihe applicant proposes the removal of the existing detached garage that encroaches the side lot line. Based on iIk recently amended height definition, there is no height variance required for the proposed addition at the east side. Structural coverage is proposed at 4.47 Si. Weckmtm confirms that the proposed improvements do not involve bedroom additions nor an increase in the number of fixmres or water use devices, review Exhibit E. He confirms that the areas to be occupied by the new additions would not be suitable for septic expansion but alerts applicant to the need to protect the area to the east of the drive and to the south of the existing septic system for future use. Weckman asks that you condition the approval of this variance on applicant’s fencing off the existing septic area and the fumre alternate site before any land alterations take place on this property. Statement of Hardships 1.Please refer to Exhibit A. The property is 1.2 acres in area and subject to 5 acre zoning standards. The property is of an unusual shape 3. 4. The residence has existed on this property for over 45 years. There is adequate septic capacity to sene the proposed improvements and adequate area for a future alternate septic site on this severely limited property. Issues for Consideration 1. Is the proposed improvement too ambitious for this property.^ Other issues raised by Planning Commission members Options of Action To approve or amend the proposed improvement plan for propeny located at 4040 Watertown Road. Any approval must be conditioned on the following conditions. 1.Existing septic system and area to south of septic system must be fenced off prior to any land alterations or construction activities at this property. r Zoning File #1956 August 11. 1994 Page 4 Applicant must obtain a demolition pcrmii from the City prior to the removal of the detached garage. 3.Applicant and future owner of site should review sighting at intersection of Watenown Road. Dense plantings at street lot line block view of vehicles leaving property. 4. Others recommended by the Planning Commission. I .1.» r CITY OF ORONO - VARLAXCE APPLICATION ■H .li/ rInitial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional Renewal Variance Fee $1(X3.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming stnictures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) u O I t t V I tfe ■ - ♦ ♦ -awi. v«;»v v"V"vv w nik w » L k • ^■”r* T a ♦ *^ •\k,Wkit I I ? »k*U •V JV' " I V' W W A -a • A•\r /- V t PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 4040 Watertown Road __________ Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) 31-118-23-41-0001 *___\_____I tn nr^nlJr'nftnn if nnf included OQ reQUil 1 IWIa ^ ----- . ,, ,, ■— 11^ Attach legal description to appljcatioiaif^t required survey. Date Property Acquired_____ IUdLl^ ^^ ---------------------------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels ot land. ^ Present use of propert>” "presidential -----other (specify) Zoning District: d tl 1 Pr.---------------------------- (month/year) AddresT ^MK. iW(t_city: h{tr\^\tn Phone (home) ^ 3^0 ~ i 3) Phonefwork) ^ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant). Name KO Phone(home) Phone (work) MT^r^\ m Cir7:_ description of REQLXST P<nm.it«iConsffuciionCost$/6(y, CCQ. quest in detail: Gck (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ V. Setback: ___Lot Width V Front __Side Hardcover Lot Coverage ^Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) required submittals All of the fnllo^^ing information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in or der for vniir application to be considered complete: 1. X/^ompleted Application Form 2 Properr>' Owners List of owners within 150’ (>'ou must obtain this list from 3. 4. /Hennepin Count>’ Department of Finance, A-603. Govi Center, 348-3271). V Plat Map (obtained with propertv' owners list). '^/Certificate of Survev (siened by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/^" .x 11" for reproduction I Topographic survey (e.xisting and proposed elevations) if any changes ine.xisting grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 81^" x 11" for reproduction.^ \ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8’/i" x 11"). ~ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). >; As an addendum tc Jiis application, please attach a separate list of any other persons vou wish notified of this application. ' Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Propertv Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your vrTin nrP npplicatjon IS not complete if the above information has not been,.included^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zonmg Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not cover d by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses mcured in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true an^c^ct^ife/best of his/her knowledge. 5. •6. 7. 8. 9. Date 7-/y-^VApplicant’s Signature (_ OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ . ., The owner herebv acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorues reasonable cntiv onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Councd members for purposes of in^stigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before ^e Planning Co^ssion to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office ot thiis change prior to the meeting. 8 w*' ; r *, ■ — tn I V ia; Hte0.60.lN * k.t KM OATf 07/H/H, MTCH tm' . raoi^' OMNCII NAHC TAWAYER NAME/AOORi• •/ • f ■■ ■ i* ■ I . - ' ■ f PROP MNM - OltCR HMC . TAXPAYER I HMC/AODRI .s*' J • I PROP AOOR 0M4ER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 5a SI-110-25 lA 0007 OAIOO MATCRTONN RO PRANK KOKESH ET AL PRANK KOKESH AlOO MATERTOItl RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 SO Sl-110-25 A1 OOOA OAIOS NATFRrOMN RO 0 6X0UERE A A CICUERE PATtULEE MARIE SAMCNUK A105 NATERTQHN RO MAPLE PLAIN ra« 55559 SO $2-110-25 ES 0000 OOAAO ORCHARD PARK RO ROOERT J A LORRAINE E RODEN ROOERT J « LORRAINE E RODEN AAO ORCHARD PARK RO L0N6 LAKE HN 5555A iHEf#«PIM COUNTY PROPERTY XrrORHATlON SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»f«RS LIST50 S1-11S-2S A1 0001OAOAO NATERT0»94 RO SUSAN KOKESH SUSAN KOKESH AOAO NATERT0M4 RO MAPLE PLAIN E94 55559 50 51-118-25 AI 0005 0A085 NATERTOHN RO C P OALE A 6 L PAULSON CHRISTOPHER P OALE CERI L PAULSON 9085 HATcRTO»94 IH) MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 50 S2-110-25 S2 0002 05900 MATERTOMN RO ORCHARD PARK PARH INC ORCHARD PARK PARM INC 5980 NAnRT0H4 RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 f ^ . HiPOfir HO.PAn 5§*«1 '56 Sl-llS-25 Ai OOOS 04065 MATtRTO^ iO tkPl H D06N €TAt lARl N 00194 4045 HATERTaMH 60 fUPlf 6LA1N HN 5555f SO 31-lli-2S 41 0012 04025 NATERTONN 60 J S i 6 D RICE JEROME STANLEY RICE 4025 NATERtgilN RO MARIE RLAIM MN SSSSf »f 1* ■». ik * - I' • ’ ■ TOTAL 6ATCH 004 ooooa ' ; • . ■■? ■■ '-y % p •<* ‘ •» X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEfMEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY FJKINLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE 'hi ) I - '• •• •« , *-. • •I.19P' ^ ^ ‘ V ■ V^'»‘ -Ufr** •. ■ - i , ■ •h'H,*.-/- ■ ■ • " • f'*’ .1' ■■■•■*' ■'> •r.-:.-. ,v r' •' 'V «r • ■ ; • :r: 49 J. H m "Vr > z oa >o z D ar >z i:T) r ’ \' vy t a t? o O F> RO F» O S E O S N/l I IH J XX FI E! S I D E fM C IH WATERTOWN ROAD & ORCHARD PARK HOAD ORONO. MN /h \ TO;Jeanne A. Mabusih. Building &. Zoning Administrator FROM: Stephen Weckman. On-Site Systems Manager DATE:August 3, 1994 SUBJECT; Application #1956, Tom and Chris Smieja - Septic Review A septic review is required due to the proposed addition onto the existing residence at 4040 Watertown Road. The two issues of importance would be whether the existing system is of adequate size and whether the proposed addition would encroach on a potential future drainfield site. The proposed additions are to the east and west and io the existing house. The number of bedrooms will remain the same with no significant increase in the number of fixtures or water using devices. No alternate site is possible adjacent to the existing struemre where the additions are propt>sed due to an insufficient area meeting setbacks from the road, driveway, and lot line. The most likely place for a replacement system would be east of the existing driveway south of the existing drainfield system. This area should be protected during construction to assure that it is available if there is a need for it in the future. Based on the above information, the proposed additions will not adversely attect the existing system or future drainfield siting pt)ssibilities. Ti*e« y r i. ,..4, t'J' ) y \I \ * ! ‘ Ni^ *ONOdO ^d>rviHi<ziisZ3u QVOy )(UVd QUVHOHO *9 QVOU NM01U31VM xxr=iii^s a HI s <z> o *J o CM Nn *ONOBO 3 o rsi 3 a I s.HJ hj QVOB )tBVd QBVHOBO 'S QVOU NM01B31VM vrHiii/Ms a3sc>«=iC>kJ«J z < •J 0. UJ > *UI »-z UJ 2 UJ</> < OD H¥i *ONOUO 3 0tsi3a IS.: avow ^MVd QMVHOMO QVOM NM01M31VM ci3S5p€=iokj^ A zo H < > ill UJ X H Coz zo K < > UJ UJ K «l < UJ