Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-20-1994 Planning Packetr f- 1 ^ r > 'b fy-, 4 I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 20, 1994, 7:00 P.M. 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY - COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE - J. Diann Goetten ATTENDANCE Applicants presenting proposals before the Commission are asked to move to the podium at the front of the Chambers when their application is announced hy the Chairman. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 7:00 p.m. #1933 Tandem Properties, 2645/3025 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing 2. 9:00 p.m. Zoning Amendment - Section 10.56, Shoreland Management Regulations ACTION ITEMS - Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. J.#1936 Charles E. Troyak, 2525 Kelly Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing 4.#1937 Erika and Herbert F. Kahler, 2725 Rainey Road - Variances - Public Hearing 5. 6. 7. #1938 Doug Olson, 537 Park Lane - Variances - Public Hearing #1939 Timothy Otten. 425 Tumham Road - Variance - Public Hearing #1940 Keith J. Spencer, 25 Orono Orchard Road North - Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Public Hearing 8.#1941 LeRoy and Wanda Fischbach, 3135 North Shore Drive - Variances - Public Hearing - To be rescheduled at a later date Planning Commission Comments 9. Report by Planning Commission Representative attending Council Meeting of June 13 1994. 10. Other issues for discussion. Additional Items 11. Planning Commission approval of minutes of the May 16, 1994 meeting. 12. Planning Commission to select a representative to attend the July 11, 1994 meeting of the Council. Adjournment I i I i '•>4 To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date:June 16, 1994 Subject:<1^1933 Tandem Properties/Peter Andrea Company, 2645/3025 Watertown Road - Preliminary Subdivision Second Phase - 21 Lots - Continuation of Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances 1.Chapter 11. Those standards pertinent to Class III subdivisions involving dedication of roads, drainage and utility easement, drainage easements, etc. 2.Section 10.55, Subd. 8 - 26’ setback to be maintained from designated wetland by all improvements. Review Outlot C within Coffin parcel. The existing driveway will be approved as a permanent driveway serving two lots. Applicant proposes no further encroachment of wetland with road improvement. Also review interior trail location within Coffin parcel - trail encroaches dedicated wetlands. 3. 4. Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) - RR-IB lot standards. Section 10.03, Subd. 27 - Standards for back lots. Review Lots 16 and 17 within Coffin property considered back lots. Note the 150% of lot width and area are satisfied. North side lot line within Lot 17 should be increased to 45*. 5.Section 10.55, Subd. 15 - City to obtain drainage easements over designated conservation areas. List of Exhibits A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - Application Plat Map Certificate of Mailing for Renotification Weckman Report 6/9/94 Gustafson Report 6/14/94 Resolution Approving First Phase Plat Plat of Old Crystal Bay Addition Plan of Interior Trails/Old Crystal Bay Road Bike Trail Designated Wetlands Wetlands Delineation Maps Tandem Letter to MCWD-Statement of Commitment, Permit 94-14 Tandem Letter to Corps of Engineers Regarding Nationwide Permit-Fill Reductions within Lx>ts 17 and 18 W .zT-.. r » r : Zoning File #1933 June 16, 1994 Page 2 M - Amended Filling Plan Requested by Corps N - Plan of Applicant ’s Amended Fill Plan O - Local Watershed Maps P - Drainage-Dickey Property-Northeast Along Willow Q-1-2 Inventory of Disturbed Areas/Mitieation Areas R - MCWD Permit 5/3/94 S - Preliminary Plans of Second Phase Pertinent Facts for Second Phase Development Dickey site - 11 lots Total acreage = 26.04 acres exclusive of road right-of-ways Coffin site - 10 lots Total acreage = 29.6 acres (2.75 wet) exclusive of road right-of ways and driveway outlot These areas do not include wetlands Types 1 and 2 not included in conservation maps of the City nor does it include the areas defined as mitigation wetland area. Status of First Phase Subdivision and Permitting Processing The first phase subdivision is in the process of being filed by the City. Accessory documents are in the final stages of completion and ready for filing. The MCWD, or LGU for the City, has granted comprehensive approval of the drainage and mitigation plans completed during the first phase review. The DNR has completed its revie’^ of the impact of the proposed total development on the Luce Line. All required improvements set forth in that review have been included in the final plat approval resolution, review Exhibit F. Review Exhibits L, M and N. During the Corps ’ comprehensive review of the 46 lot subdivision, Mr. Yanta advised that if the applicant was to meet the requirements of a nationwide permit that filling within Lots 17 and 18 would have to be reduced. The developer is concerned with the impact on the building envelope and has submitted a request to reconsider their request to reduce the filling by .4 acre. Review Exhibit M. Applicant has submitted the amended plan showing a reduction in the amount of fill by .25 acres asking that the additional .15 acre of fill needed to provide a reasonable separation between the wetland and the proposed home site. The developer has asked that the nationwide permit be approved asking that Basin 1-A receive 2.03 acres of fill. Staff will contact Mr. Yanta prior lo the meeting to see if he will approve amended proposal. In conclusion, all reviewing agencies have reviewed the comprehensive drainage and grading plan and have either provided conceptual approval or conditional approval. The Park Commission has reviewed the 46 lot proposal. The City has approved the comprehensive interior trail plan, review Exhibit H. The Park Commission has not been asked to review the second phase subdivision. Zoning File #1933 June 16, 1994 Page 3 Review of Second Phase Subdivision I jQt Configuration All lots meet the required two acres of dry contiguous lands exclusive of designated wetlands and retention treatment ponds. Note the designated wetland within Lot 16 has not been shown as a drainage easement. The lot area should be amended to include total dry buildable exclusive of wetland area. Lots 15 and 18 (Coffin property) do not meet the required width along cul-de-sac. Lots 15. 16, 17, 18 and 19 (Dickey property) are classified as ^ough lots and conditional use permits would be required for any accessory s^cture installed at some future date. As already noted above in the factual findings. Lots 16 and 17 are served by a driveway outlot that has been placed over an existing driveway that served the Coffin residence within Lot 16. As in the first phase review, the road layout and driveway access 16 and 17 were concepnially approved by both Planning Commission and Council dunng e sketch plan review phase. The issue of applicability must be addressed in this review. A loop road connecting northern cul-de-sac road with Watertown Road would have a major impact on the designated wetland. In the conceptual review of the application, the City deemed it^t necessary to have a loop road connecting Old Crystal Bay Road to Watertown Road. The installation of a private road within the area defined as Outlot C would also ™ development, specifically adjacent to the existing driveway at the intersection of Watertown Lad. ^he north side yard of Lot 17 should be adjusted to a 45’ width. Lot 15 s side setback should be adjusted to 50 ’ adjacent to Outlot B (Coffin property). rirading/Drainage/Wetlands_ As already noted above in the status report, the only agency still to complete the re^ew of the comprehensive grading and drainage plan is the Corps. Mitigation areas have teen approved. The issue for the Corps is the resolve of the amount of fill to be placed within Lo 17 and 18 (Dickey property). There was concern with drainage coining from northeast comer of Dickey parcel eventuallv to the Luce Line. As noted by developer during the first ph^ Drive pond is proposed within Lot 8 (Dickey). Drainage will dram from 1"'^ f" dirough L DNR park under Luce Line via a 48” culvert that cames draimge throug h a swale evenmallv south along Willow (review Exhibit P). The developer shall provide incre^ Storage " apX at the northeast comer of the Dickey property to minimize any impact on existing developed properties in Countryside neighborhood. Parks/Trails/Park Dedicatioj The City will ask for a park dedication fee for the second phase subdivision. Applicant should Spond^to placement of interior trail within designated wetlands. We did not address L Zoning FUe #1933 June 16, 1994 Page 4 this issue during the first phase review, probably, because we were too involved with Sacred Land issues and public vs. private trail ownership. It is not clear whether the interior trail was even designated on preliminary plans reviewed by Planning Commission during first phase review. Why can ’t trail be relocated away from wetlands? Septic Please review Exhibit D, Weckman notes all 21 lots have been found to have suitable area for primary and alternate drainfield sites suitable for a five-bedroom home. Roads Applicant proposes a cul-de-sac road accessing at Willow Drive to serve the second phase Dickey parcel. The Coffin parcel will be served also by a cul-de-sac road and private driveway outlot serving Lots 16 and 17. Note the City has already approved the back lot configurations for Lots 6 and 7. The developer is once again advised that if cul-de-sac roads are proposed, they shall remain privately maintained by benefitting property owners consistent with the City’s policy. Other issues raised bv the Planning Commission Any condition of approval should include the following conditions: Recommendation must provide supportive findings approving the back lot configurations for Lots 16 and 17 finding them not to have been a convenience to the developer but based on findings supporting environmental and aesthetic concerns for the development. Will Planning Commission recommend setback variances for encroachment of wetlands by interior trails? If so, list applicant ’s hardships. Lot width variances for Lots 15 and 18 would be consistent when lots abut cul-de-sac. The following conditions are recommended by staff: 1.Cul-de-sac roads on Coffin and Dickey parcels shall be private. The City shall obtain underlying road and utility easements. The developer shall develop private covenants for the maintenance of private roads. Applicant should also address the ownership of Outlot C, whether that shall be a shared ownership. If not, then one owner shall be responsible for granting an easement to the second owner. 1 *^-:*'y »-?. Zoning File #1933 June 16, 1994 Page 5 » * 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Dedication of drainage and utility easements 5’ along all interior lot Imes and 10 along the perimeter boundaries and adjacent to road rights-of-way. Prior to any site improvements within the second phase, erosion control as shown on preliminary grading and drainage plans must be installed and maintained until natural groundcover is restored. Prior to site grading improvements, ail tested septic sites on Dickey parcels must be fenced off. (exception Lots 16 and , P Approval of interior trail plan for second phase of Coffin parcel. The Dickey parcel involves the north lot line of Lot 13, second phase. All wetlands designated on City conservation maps shall be sh^n as dramge easements on the plat. Designated wetland within Lot 16 must be designated y a drainage easement. Drainaae easement shall be taken over all retention ponding areas and drainageways. As in the first phase reviews, such easement shall the cLin of Title and developer shall create covenants to define future hleowL* association’s responsibility for upkeep and maintenance of all drainage facilities. Payment of a park dedication fee prior to final plat approval. The following lots have been found to contain protected wetlands not designated on the City’s conservation area maps: Dickey parcel: Lots 8, 17, 18 and 19, B*°ck 2 Coffin parcel: Lots 11. 12. U. 15. H and 20. Block 1 The following lots shall have involvement with mitigation areas: Dickey parcel: Lots 8. 9. 13. 16. 17. 18 and 19 Bl«k 2 Coffin parcel: Lots 11. 12. 13. 15. 17 and 20. Block 1 . .h. fir« subdivision the developer shall create covenants to be fil^ in As properties advising fiiture owners of the the Cham of Title specific areas and the need to first apply to the r™r oT Tnl^" "e Shaha Creek Watershed District if any im^ovements are proposed at some future date before obtaiiung necessary permits from the City of Orono. r Zoning File #1933 June 16. 1994 Page 6 10.Applicant to execute Developer’s Agreement to ensure all grading/drainage improvements and road improvements are installed to City’s satisfaction. No land alterations can take place until erosion control is established and septic sites fenced and the City is in receipt of final grading and road plans. No improvements can begin until CiQr Engineer has approved all improvement plans. A Letter of Credit must accompany a fully executed Developer’s Agreement written to 150% of the cost of the proposed road and site improvements. No building permits will be issued until all drainage facilities have been installed and approved satisfactory road base completed. 11. Prior to final plat approval, applicant shall provide road name choices for the private cul-de-sac roads within both the Coffin and Dickey parcels. i. i ) • .A.. . , M ii [of OROHO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATItOPERTY LOCATION, _ Ja2S Ct/4T(/(r^^/^ A oa ^'^Site Address TJTtfS "_________# 1 O 3 3 ^CCOF^J*^ F4AC(l) ______t^P/C<6Y F44C$t] Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) >^y-//7"^,7 Please check one - Property _ _ abstract or ?<_ torrens? i APPLICANT Name Phone (home) Phone (work)_^7/ -^^73 Address: 2.7FS Czrr^ FT. /M City: ItJAlTZA FA Zip; SSSJ/ OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Phone (work) Addirass •city:Zip; (attach list if more tnan one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels ^yTVt Development Size Present Use (check) /l3±Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land /^7.9/‘ Acres Total# all parcels ^_ _ _ Residential; no. of ^ l'.TO - Other (specify)_________rmWE QFFI€S- 01 £t.V 6175.C PROPOSAL 1350200000 Present Zoning District ■- ‘■^rrrr-7!Mrr«/- a3023l0 cool ROl TL. 04/2< Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Division for Tax Purposes Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites; Pxoposed Gross Density; Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use; (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per^Ovcres ^7 y2^ Sq Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) L, •3.4.^NIMOM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Completed Applxcation FormPlat Information on Certificate of Survey*Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtai^county Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. cOTpletV^*^^°” Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is Zoning Official's Signature Date : 1. I 2. iv4. :*.5* f®®®' filing fee, sewer and water assessments). TiSe opinion Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. Easements, Covenants, etc. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & iii) Subdivision of a Lot Llr.-* il'<:.^rrangement Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivision) Preliminary Review (Class III & all non-residential) fl(7S A/ijr /0//4T€ Final Plat Review (Class III) ♦(Plus any legal or engineering charges) Renewal of Preliminary Subdivision Application Renewal of Final Subdivision Application $200.00 300.00 300.00 325.00 + 25.00/Lot 175.00 150.00 100.00 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees^stabllshed by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting.^ o O 'u-:, o r m«.t:••ix.-J.iill..,prop :aodrVAOMNCIINAHi ^y.TAxfAun ¥i-!V-trL : •#. /; • • ...••'•‘•r ..•'HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM * PROPERTY ONNERS LIST -V >. ..i.•*t • '»r*1 .?*. ».*kZS M 0028 ^-„.,.jTERTO»tl RONANE/AObR‘^Zi^fH*^llT(»M ROAD • WCT 0031 V ** ftIWW iX**: tJTi I nu t%n u .Vt^'<0»t«R NAME fOOO«X!$y,NILLOH OR N It^AVsANDHEZt L R SANOHEI TtidlUSi'Ail LINDA R SANOHEI 553S6 ♦. .* * ■w., ^S^na-25 33 0055 !' ^rro ^: amr M^ unassigneo :<^'OMCR NAHEM mYEVRENDLEMAN .' TAWAYER rlSr.'MIUIAH'JMARTIM ■ NAME/ADDR ;%:E380 NATERTOFM RO :v\-» v-jLii-. ;.^N\;i';-^;;L0N8’LAKE.MM * 55S5A I * »r'. ” 'J J.3W-N? JMi•WL*T:r^\ . \ PRPP .AODRVmm.,;;>:0»MER NAME^ ••(il^*>TA><PAYERVf;J*g^ • Vr v‘ ,’•■ -j ',C'SJ''''fL rM 00^ oooei mw ' • y.‘ S'i«r VIM M■Mv'^fjrj m w|§:41 •il ♦ V/ ••_» 38 33-118-23 AA 002902A20 HATERTOtOI RO H J JOHNSON ETAL TIMOTHY JOHNSON 2A20 HATERTOtOI RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 AA 0032 00051 NILLOH OR N VIOLA T 6UNS0LUS VIOLA T GUNSOLUS 51 NILLOH OR N LONG LAKE m 55356 38 3A-118-23 33 0056 022A5 HATERTOHN RD THOMAS J RYAN THOMAS J RYAN 22A5 NATERTOHN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 • V' - v ■..•*h/.• • • I ..REPORT NOa 1 PAGE• i;.V*» / ' I -I u;.f *i V ; A • . io *• •. V ’ry*• ;• .> ’* sH. •• * a V . y • .V%: . .-v38 33-118-23 AA 0030 i.'ni- 5 02A00 NATERTOFM RO . JEFFREY HARTINEAUjcrrnrv mirwnhh2A00 HATERTOHN RO ’ • ;LONG LAKE MM • :-55356■• .: . ;■ • SA-118-23 33 OOOA ■m'- ■ • • • ., i • .♦ ' .*1*•• ■:;r ••Jv* • • •! ^ id.i . *1 • \ :j. •■■■!'! 02380 .NATERTOMI RO NlLLlAH E MARTIH j-;' HlLLlAM MARTIN ‘ 2380 NATERTOHN RO LONG LAKE »M , 55356 ^ . 38 3A-118-2S 33 0057 023A0 NATERTOHN RO IIALTER R IRt LARTW Slfci SPllp: I pipil Vm^LJLVI- V V rNALTCR R neC ARTHY -T^-. • i’Vvl' i‘ A.*:* - • • # . •. *. • ’. .ft : ; 2340 NATERTOm RD LONG LAKE MN 5535A lym 5if*''-?’* * Co.tM'<ch> ^ /v t >■?:;%vV;fe: pwas*?':.! . Jlirfai " ‘ '1 c . A- • f ■y-v- •»'i' ••■.i, *• • (.f •. • ' V • • .. •* •’d'i5 ../••».».# • 8 • •i .A: •■ .V- •!■''V ■I i *•■. <■•. -t\ ^ *1 •vv• • V • V-- I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND^TRUE ’’AJ^VV. ■ REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORD ,0F THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPAR OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF OATI ^ raaSWi'sTIJ''^’ ’A r r. PI« Vi' V PpiSS'? !■ ■‘•'■if. ■’■'.■ ' t ,; .v-. At ‘ •> ♦.•J' .-.V vl --------------------------------, ^ pAn;. lV;0V9S. .^•- ■=,••.?>Vs®*5^S-il7-lS ! . MOP. Aoim'!:^y; ours/,iMONsvxi MfNNEPlN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST . ,22 000502S7S4iM0N6VIEH CIR ^ . OMCR NAME'V;'6t I ;S L05TETTERTAXPAYER '- VCARY 0 A SANDRA F LOSTETTER NAHE/AOOR V*'U7S LONBVIEH CIRCLE ^5535622 0020 OR j 02575 ?>l 'OEVIM LA OMCR NAME/r. CtA R CAROOENUTO PROP AOOR TAXPAYER CARpOENUTO NAME/AOOR '•'< i 2575 DEVIN LA ■ J.• ’ii-^ .lOMO .LAKE MM 0005 PROP'A00R!!^:-^b2A55';i COUNTRYSIDE OR ■ ; OMCR ■ NAME ‘v\pit • J MILLER TAXPAYER S-WPHILLIP C MILLER • • |^NANE/AODR '2A5S COUNTRYSIDE OR 55556 0000 PROP A00R; /;,i]00i50 ‘.>r MANOR CIR OMCR NAME ;l«,K<AiV',OANCERT TAXPAYER )?.u!;KEiTM .A VIVIAN BANGERT . NAHE/AOOR->^150;HAN0R CIR '.H:: • V \ H i LONB LAKE ’ MM 55556 .. . .^ — ** 0011 ;|/,PROP AOOR^OWSv^COWTRYSIOE OR ■' V'OMCR NAFjE'iS^UlMXCHiA C E MICH I TAXPAYER ‘MltHONAS; 0 MICH 'V: i '• MMC/AOOR«tIMS COUNTRYSIDE OR i “ > 55556 r.;jM SOR^lV. ____mame M '‘■'J TAXPAYER . PROP AOOR ;^vrt005AO(^.OLO CRYSTAL BAY RO >. OMCR NAME l'»T R P HIMaCH . — ...I i.«----^-jYVt MINNICH H.0''CRYSTAL BAY ROAD LAREliMI : 55556 50 05-117-23 22 001000010 NILLON OR SHILLIAM S BOHHAN ET ALMl S B0IO1AN A A B HCCOURTC/0 JACK J RANDALL6TH A MARQUETTE A5500 Ml CTRMPLS Ml 55670-2069 >M.5B 06-117-25 II 0005 02620 COUNTRYSIDE OR ROSS NATHANSON ROSS NATHANSON P 0 BOX 1B9 LONG LAKE MN 55356-01S9 » •. 56 0^-117-25 11 0006 02675 COUNTRYSIDE DR N E HITE JR I B A HITE H EUGENE I BARBARA A HITE JR 2675 COUNTRYSIDE DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 56 06-117-25 11 0009 00165 MANOR CIR B N BILLICK A B H BILLICK 4 165 MANOR CIR LONG LAKE MN i .* * t • r*t . V ( L K BILLICK L K BILLICK •• *• 55556 . * * • f 50 06-117-23 12 0006 y • 02615 COUNTRYSIDE OR / • ' 0 A S PEARCE • • V • DAVIO H A SUSAN M PEARCE r. . 2615 COUNTRYSIDE DR • LONG LAKE MN 55356 ^• • •• • ’ \ ' <.V‘ 36 06-117-25 15 0006 00250 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S DENNIS O THOMPSON ^ ‘ • DENNIS 0 THOMPSON 12201 MINNETONKA BLVO MINNETONKA Ftl 55565 . .:••• 4 • «• • • • ’ V •.; F 56 05-117-25 02580 DEVIN OIL BLAUER DARRELL H BLAUER 2580 DEVIN LA LONG LAKE MN 55556»w r f #56 06-117-23 11 0006 02650 COUNTRYSIDE OR L A KRETCHMAN A S 0 GRANDE , L A KRETCHMAN A S 0 GRANOE -v.^'n * 2650 COUNTRYSIDE DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 . > ■ 36 06-117-23 11 0007 02515 COUNTRYSIDE 01 K R FRITZE A K F FRIT; KEITH R A KIMBERLY F .1 2515 COUNTRYSIDE OR LONG LAKE MN ‘ 55556 • C>tcr^ 36 06^117-25 11 0010 . 02590 COUNTRYSIDE OR ' < I If riiiTA I u 1 rnmflXs JO HN R A IICAfICR B KALXTA 2590 COUNTRYSIDE OR ,/ ! LONG LAKE Ml • 55556 I'/.. '•'Sim-f ••• \y -***••»* ,*i <•*!* 4 56 06-117-25 12 02665 HATERTONN PATRICIA C DICKEY PATRICIA C DICKEY 2665 HATERTOMN RD LONG LAKE MN ft! I# m EST MCT; n/'.IM’ ImMiMiki ;;o3r ‘'15wEsru^:^iG;iV'^|;! THE STATE OF. MINNESOTA /V;.:: DNR-BUREAU OF REAL ATTN GHEN 1201 E HHY GRAND RAPI \f MJN OAT* 11/09/np^i•■• BATCH OOA ! MiJf' T«•?j f -HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Olt4ERS LIST . .0009^ .5Sij55-nS-E5 59 PROP AODR . '^02695 r:!| NEAR CIR 0»t€R NAME ‘ii WAR ENTERPRISES PARTNERSHIP TAXPAYER ^-r^lyiNEAR/ENTERPRlSES PARTNERSHIP NAME/AOOR* ;^C>0 NXLLXAM H HEAR•"i^Jv.V:r:Sw.B0»<..*A* •••. V • t.: L0N6 LAKE HN ' S5S5A■?V *--vA■j* '^Vv.V-'Tvflt^ J *'\v' • • •..? • • • ..-i .-A V ^ sbWss-iib-es AS 0001 ...027*0 )*A MATERT0»«4 RDRROR ADOR r ; OIMCR NAME :4,I0SEPH H. ROSCH TAXPAYER v::’ JOSEPH. H ROSCH NAME/ASDR 'r>4*90* JAHES AVE S i. RICHFIELD. MN 55A23 ' .i*'*- •• ^ A : i*^*o^7*AQ*«* 0009 ADOR .V 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED '^^R HAME : i* J P I H e P WOCT ET AL TAXPAYER :;••■ ” -VCTOI ‘ ■ NAHE/ADDR ; Hs'OOLDEN VIEH DR ■ .:;i . • • *l VV 1^ ! « .^ * .) .‘IfSO;. 55-110-25 AA 0001 PROP ADDR ' .^^02590 .'%: .HATERTO»«« RO ' OMNER NAHE^|iROOERT:F.SUESS ETAL V.- , TAXPAYER ROOERT.' F SUESS ! V im/ADOH':l 2590 NATERTOHN RO ■ •. -.'•A'!.' Cii'iVLOHDlLAICB •. 1: • VJi‘VLOr«:LAKE HN 5555* •?: PROP ADDR »'r' V R .* S5-55-110-25 99 0017 •hHACKDERRY HILLK 00055 (RtlER NAME >i R H HAGHAN ETAL TAXPAYER RICHARD H HAGHAN V:} «e UAriTBBDDV UTI INAME/AOOR .\>55 .HACRDERRY HILL 55556- /i' ; y^' I ss^iie- . AMRO i 25 99 0025 VuOOOSO .VeHACKDERRY HILL •X. AL ' PROP ADOR. OHNER NAME TAXPAYER ; -- - - - - - - - - ' NAHE/ADDR itfiSO HACKDERRY HILL 2 - h VVr-LONC LAKE MN 55556 r. CHARLES . D CHARLES D AUTRY /•I »58 55-110-25 59 001002955 HEAR CIR NEAR ENTERPRISES PARTNERSHIP HEAR ENTERPRISES PARTNERSHIP i* C/0 NILLIAH N NEAR PO BOX 506 LONG LAKE MN 55556 V'!»• . ** 58 55-118-25 95 0009 02690 NATERTOHN RO T P GORMAN ALT GORMAN/ \\ T P • L T GORMAN 2690 NATERTOHN RD S LONG LAKE MN 55556 58 55-118-25 95 0010 00055 GOLDEN VIEH DR H 2 L CHORLEY MICHAEL E A LUCINDA CHORLEY 55 GOLDEN VIEH DR LONG LAKE HN 55556 58 55-118-25 99 0002 02590 NATERTOHN RD ROBERT F SUESS ETAL ROBERT F SUESS ^ 2590 HATERT0I04 RD LONG LAKE HN 55556 /.• •. : • 58 55-118-25 99 0018 00055 HACKBERRY HILL R H HACMAN ETAL RICHARD N HAGHAN 55 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE MN . 55556 1 •% 58 55-118-25 99 0026 00056 HACKBERRY HILL H H NEAR ETAL HILLIAM H NEAR / BOX 506 LOtKp LAKE rt4 55556 *v ^ •»%• • ■ I* *; • t *• • .* .• jkV :r-.A r ■ > »■ « V.• .* •• ». 58 55-118-25 59 0011 00058HEAR ENTERPRISES NEAR ENTERPRISES C/O HILLIAM PO BOX 295 LONG LAKE 58 55-118-25 95 0005 00120 GOLDEN.VIEH W ’.V, 61 RICHARD J A JANELLI> M MIELKE 51 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN I MIELRE vii jfV 58 55- 02980 R N HAG RICHARD 55 HACK 22 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE HN • ' %•*. 4l!.7-1 Mi« P-"r—iTD w* - -- HENtJEPIN117-25 M 0006 COUNTRYSIDE DR_________isUSAlSCiWEOLV•' TMVAYERiVj^sIlU:AiL SCHNEBLY r '(;'^2555 COUNTRYSIDE DR55556M ooo^ ;.RR6RAOORk|;||oOOe5;OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S ' TAXPAYER '^ f-rfiTHEO; J HEYER ^ OMCR NAME .^^ItHEO J HEYER ETAL 'w ‘ -i!' ■• : '•'V: NAME/AOOR'iBS'OLO:CRYSTAL BAY RO i^lLONO LAKE Ml 55556 21 0007 Pl^ AMm^XoOOM .iA^ L* OMCR NAHE- '^cU C DEf SANTIS . TAXPAYER ' IkOARY A^CMERYL OE SANTIS^ NAHE/AOOR S BO NEAR U LAKE Ml . 55556 .• > % . ».• ■- Vt*' /I ; ;.r:y;5B .06-117-25 22 0020 • PROP A00Rir:(;r00160 CYGNET PL ,OMCR NAHEV-::»*iA OEBERNAROl 6 J L OLSON VTAXPAYER:i;li«J#L^OLSOH A P A OE BERNAROl NAHE/AODRi^160 fCYGNET PL- •i^ORONOAHN r . 55556 ^ 'iV;-. 22 0025 PROP ■ AOOR'-'VI s 00150 ii' CYGNET PL OMCR NAH2-r:|HAR6ARETi.O R0SS1N6 TAXPAYER i MARGARET? D ROSSINC Nahe/aodr; ift;i50;CY«CT. PL HiilLONB .LAPr Ml:: 55556 is‘5B!5^06^17-25 25 OOU V V. PROP' A00RF?K001B5i?i'CY0NET PL OlfCR NAHE’ VCALVIN'PRESBYTERIAN CH ORONO TAXPAYER •'. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN , NAME/AOOR W GRAND'AVI A GLENDALE V ■■ -Vl • 'long.LAKE Ml 55556 COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST ‘i/’»• •38 06-117-25 21 000102985 HATERTOHN RO MARGARET T TROICRIOGE MARGARET T TR0H8R1DGE 2985 HATERTOHN RO long lake MN 55556 N .. • ..Y .-- »V r• * I.;• «• y.' *,• si.<• •*’>• » t58 06-117-25 21 0005 00020 ' HEAR LA J A 0 MORTON JAMES B A DOROTHY A MORTON 20 HEAR LA , . * LONG LAKE MM 55556 . .6 s •*. 58 06-117-25 22 0011 00155 CYGNET PL H R ANOERSSON A E E MORIARTY ; H R ANOERSSON A E E MORIARTY -■ 155 CYGNET PL <■ > LONG LAKE MN 55556 !• ’ *• .• t • r • V‘ 3B 06-117-25 22 0021 00190 CYGNET PL R A HOHRMAN A R A HOHRHAN RONALD A A ROBIN A HOHRMAN /• 190 CYGNET PL . ’ LONG LAKE MN 55556 50 06-117-25 22 0027 05005 HATERTOItl RO HHEATON CONSTRUCTION INC STEVEN A MARGO HIRTJES y ‘ 5005 HATERTOt-M RO i i LONG LAKE MN 55556 • t *••• • . < • .» 30 06-117-25 25 0016 00220 CYGNET PL R J PROVO SR A M M PROVO ROBERT J PROVO ^ 220 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE MN 55556 ;•*; »• r-'V. . ‘I n: . I ■V;<-.A. 3B 06 02065MICHAEL J FITZPATRICK IT MICHAEL/PATRICIA FITZPATRICK* 2865 HATERTOMI “ ”LONG LAKE MN Lli»f58 06-117-2300050 HEAR LA 0 A J HILL DAVID M 50 HEAR LONG LAKE .-f. . ..-jJii'iiii.i IkV!hili * •L' 38 06-117 00165 CYGNET PL A E BLOEMENOAAL ETAL AWHUR E-BLOPC Itf 1 B0H-581F LONG LAKE MN 55556 I-'r i:r ktr h siteart.tr- 5B 06-117-25 i 00100 CYGNET VIL OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 ' CRYSTAL BAY HH t ‘V- 30 06-117-25 22 0028 05065 HATERTOItl RO BRUCE C A KATHRYN S HALL BRUCE C A KATHRYN S HALL! 5065 HATERTOHN ORONO MN r** J* k • . » •* • .1 ALL-. vt IRYN S HALL: ■ -.ti:' *. . 58 06-117-25 25 00268 CYGNET PL DEAN K MOLIN ETAL DEAN K MOLIN - 268 CYGNET PLACE t LONG LAKE Ml - *‘t »’•!<• ’-1 HENHEPIM COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSHM PROPERTY 0»t4ERS LISTPROP ?AOOR«\ >iOOE40!i^.CYGNET PLOMNER NAME'j’itfEUGENE. C^:OETERLIN6 A HIFETAXPAYER ‘iil:;,EUCENE C<OETERLIMG NAIC/A00R.vyZ40;CYGNET PUCEk »■ . « # L> > .a m.»0m nyjft long LAKE »« • 55556 ii 0025 l0d;i#!!RlbCEHOOO CIR OHNER NAME-MFRANRCJ/IrPATRICIA K ROUTSON > TAXPAYER >^^.<[*rRANK*^J! ROUTSON NAME/AOOR ^ >;SXOO RIOGENOOO CIR '••■.f-';-..■>‘-'<>-‘‘HoNG.IARE-MM ■' 55556 0005 PROP M»rH‘^00555>5^ OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S CPMER NAME'i'l-MARY DiRYERSE'>,. ' 0»t«R NAHE.y^cMARY. D[RYERSE TAXPAYER . ;;*-iURY:o' RYERSE y. ; NAME/A00R/:i555rOLb; CRYSTAL BAY RO S ! ••• ' •• ;..','-':i\LOMC 'lake: mn 55556 " >v4-^5bi;06^^^ ta ooo6 PROP AODR: , k00275 V OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S •W R'A'B'K-COFFINOMICII NAME TAXPAYER l GOROON A BAI»ARA COFFIN NAt«/AODR'.^ 5025 HATERT0»f4 RO ' ■ ■ - - -‘- 555561. j. . ;‘.J4 '.*•! ^^■^f;V;.■^r?;,;:jIB^;06-Xl7-^5 5X OOXX PROP A0DR >I''500660 :>Y,SUSSEX LA OFMER NAME ‘liN N. A D C NXLOHAN f.i 1C TAXPAYER ^ U n INA H A DONALD C HILDHAN NAME/AODR ,^.765'SPRING HILL RO ' HAYUTA W . > 5559X , rmpf^ AOOE q»OE7EOi*^ HIIITE OAK ;/ :l OMMEE MAHE^-ft WA M‘ ; ;; V JA>(PAYER!|iv».WW^ OOMERTY ^2 0016 CIR r.v.- 50 06-117-25 25 002105100 RIOGENOOO CIR LOREN CROSS TRUSTEE LOREN GROSS B606-LYN0ALE AVE S BLOOMINGTON MN 55620 . 1,1. ..V •r O',-••V•V:‘1■V r ADDRESS UNASSIGNED .. , ; 38 M-117-23 23 0027 00038 N N A S J LAUE HERMAN N A SHIRLEY J LAUE 59^ PARK LANE LONG LAKE MN 55358 .V . 1 *‘9. ' !•* I ' \n- 1. '-V- 38 08-117-23 28 0008 ; 00605 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S'*.- LEON G HARNER ... . i. \ . ‘ MADPg^ l\Ai tU ' 6051» OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO '' LONG LAKE MN 55556 . i’-;. I V...*w Jr ; • b ' • 1'I* 38 08-117-23 28 0007 00395 SUSSEX LA N N A D C HILDHAN NINA N A DONALD C NILDMAN 785 SPRING HILL RD HAYZATA MN 55391 * • 4I i . ’ ..1 f •• 6 A ’ I '• • I • ' <• i' 50 06-1X7-25 52 0010 05050 SUSSEX RO , N H A 0 C HILOMAN i NINA H A DONALD C HILDHAN 765 SPRKKf hill RD HAYZATA MN 55591 • f • i; I«, I • I •; ».9. » • 38 33-118-23 33 0001 03020 NATERTONN RD R A STUODS ETAL RENA M STUBBS 3020 NATERT0I«4 RD * LONG LAKE MN 55356 • • • .n* ;v.^ :. 1 .V . < •IREPORT ND. PX83S801)J*6-X17-25 25 0022»38 08 03150 RIOGENOOO CIR JAMES 0 BRINDLEY JAMES D BRINDLEY iW''/flN.Ti5150 RIDGENO( LONG LAKE MN CIR 55556 1ISm in &ii If 50 06-1X7-25 26 0002 m00225 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO PEARL OEFWY ET ,ALVv ‘ ** PEARL DENNY i> <*', 225 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RD S LONG LAKE MN ■' -i ' *» ' S'te'i 06-1X7-25 26- 0005 8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED r%l!lrKS%? ....................... T • .v!;-.* -/ v..y- • ■ ■ ■ ;'l ••' V cV'- -25 51 000X..Vt‘it;-v..s4.l SB 0005S STATE OF MI»M STATE' OF MINN (DNRI I LUCE LINE TRAIL I -V •V .(■ I:!. %}• ■k 5S 06-XX7 00625 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RD NAP LAHTON | DR HILLIAH G LAMTON 625 SO OLO CRYSTAL BAY LONG LAKE m S4Si'.,-i.:-S -• - t't’A RD - mm a®-!Eslii i-r A'-. 50 06-XX7-25 52 00655 SUSSEX LA N H A D C NILDMAN NINA H A DONALD 765 SPRING HILL HAYZATA MN 55 t»• ./38 33-118 00055 HEAR 't :aIII 'V HEAR ENTERPRISES PARTNERSHIP.-^J,;|;!v?/^^ HEAR ENTERPRISES C/0 HILLIAH PO BOX 506 n :i’; :■ 1 ■* • •.irv ;. LONG LAKE MN ,V555564T4>v‘''.f)Wi' >■: PI ii sssr ,r, —... ^ . D TO:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator FROM; Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:June 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Application #1933 Tandem Properties - Septic Review I have reviewed the proposed septic system testing and design for this property and would make the following comments. Due to newly defined wetland areas, the drainfield sites must need different setbacks than normally required. Wetland classification identification and delineation were performed by Franklin J. Svoboda & Associates which indicated Type I and II wetlands not previously located on the City’s wetland inventory maps. The City’s inventory maps designate primarily Type III, IV, or V wetlands v hich have standing water during much of the year. As the Type I and II wetlands do not contain standing water during the growing season, drainfield sites must be located outside of the wetlands, however the normal 75 ’ setback will not be required for these wetland areas. Site evaluation and septic system design were performed by S-P Testing for the second phase of both Dickey and Coffin sites. All soil boring holes have been located on the surveys of these properties. All drainfield sites on both properties meet the required lot line, driveway, well and wetland setbacks and are located on slopes less than 6%. Based on the information provided, I would recommend approval of the application. , r Bonestroo BOsene AndeiilkA Associates One O. lorfiim •DOn W. iMnc. JSH9f C Andi^k, »• I iorv*a pe i«*M e TMintn Pf 0<nnt.CoocPl TheifiM I* \-6ytl Pf. Mpi G khuncnr. p| luur M eonr. c pa CoriUlit EnQlnccrs A Architects June 14,1994 Hosuae A SthM PJ. ntm A. Oonor\ PI SDort I. pmmm. pi. ticn#^ w PoMa. PI OM O iOrnUM, PI ABOrV C Af A Jffry A iMDA. Pt. Mir^ A MjflMfl. PI. Mtefna r «iuvn«nr\ PC mCPWCPt rniPlil • AAAlWt AJ A OAAaic cufaoL pc rh0#fiMA||tePC PI >imNil«irnhtt. Pi p liu Pf Afhfi M 1^ AJC P 7hanM W. Hmwi\ P| MKAifi C Mfocn. P| MUiAAPf jtfiy Q mnnay ft %etm J Arganti. PC- Kinrwcn P. Atmrmn. PI Maul AgPiPf Mara A saa PC Oily W. MMi\ P4. Paul JL Oamiart. aja Oaraa J tegawA ft K Ptt itmoL PC PAAo X CaawtC PC Mara O \AM PC uei • Pf L PriAp Gmeii P|. la<ti« C WWMtA Pf. oary o vnaoiu. PI PMifoMr. PC laahl PC. Doufiaf X CtPot. PC lhaaun O. QuiiaNorv PI Cfcmo OAim. PC Paul 0. HfMiii PI jQ#m P OaMit PI. cnanti A. cnduon im M PfwMiay HaAmM om MimiP ingaviaiei Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 5532J Re: Tandem Properties FUe No. 139-1901 Dear Jeanne, We have reviewed the most recently revised preliminary grading and drainage plan prepared by Coffin & Oronberg, Inc. for Tandem Properties. The recent reviiiona to both phases 1 and 2 have been minor changes in the lot lines, septic sites and pond design. The plan is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. The final plans must show how the drainage will be handled on Lot 3, Block 1, on the Dickey Parcel The preliminary plans do not show how the existing 24" culvert will be extended past the proposed trail, or how the ditch drainage from Old Crystal Bay Road will be routed to the proposed pond. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES, INC. /ULy, Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E.: -I m m 4k • mk 4m m m 0 • ^ 0^0 m 0 : *4 * ..........^ Ph“iK.; r F- CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 4 2 7 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF CRYSTAL BAY ROAD ADDITION FILE NO. 1901 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Muinesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development ot land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for the subdivision of a 25 lot plat by Orono Limited Partnership, a Minnesota Limited Pannership (hereinafter the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need ot any variances; WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1.Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 3415, the resolution granting preliminary approval of the Class III subdivision. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements 3.Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for public roads shown as Countryside Drive West and Watenown Road. 4.Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot E to be known henceforth as Deer Run Trail. 0.Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City a road and utility easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said outlot; the subdivider has created non-e.xclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said outlot in favor of all abutting lots including a declaration of covenants, conditions, restrictions and private roadway easement wherein any lot shall be sold. Page 1 of 4 I I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________. . . t____.____________________________________ i ■1- i M r CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 842?’NO. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. transferred and conveyed together with an undivided 1/10 interest in said road outlet whereby benefitting lot owners covenant and agree to permanently maintain and pay cost of maintenance for said private road. The subdivider has also created certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting lot owners adjacent to the public road Countryside Drive West covenants and agrees to maintain and pav the cost of maintenance for said public road while it remains a cul-de-sac road "and not a through road connecting to Willow Drive. The subdivider has dedicated to the City a temporary road and utility easement over the area of the cul-de-sac not included within the 50’ dedicated right-of-way of Countryside Drive West. The subdivider has dedicated to the City drainage easements over all detention areas, wetlands, and drainageways within the plat providing for limitations on the use of these areas and shown on the plat as drainage easements. The subdivider shall create private covenants covering the upkeep and maintenance of all drainage facilities. The subdivider has created protective covenants for all lots containing protected wetlands not included within conservation maps of the City of Orono and the areas defined as mitigation area. Covenants have been drafted to include metes and bounds descriptions of the areas and maps defining the location of these areas within each lot. Dedication to the City of a bicycle trail easement along the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road located within Blocks 2 and 3 and a pedestrian trail easement located within Blocks 1, 2 and 3. Dedication by deed of Outlot A for public use. Execution of a subdivider’s agreement providing for the installation of certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval as follows. a. Detention ponds and drainageways. b. Private and public roads. c.Erosion control. Page 2 of 4 •• i ^ --- r h t. ‘ 4 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE Cin' COUNCIL 8427NO. d. Bike trail and interior pedestrian tr^il (located only within Dickey parcel). e.Removal of all structures within Outlot A. f.Removal of all accessory structures on Lot 1, Block 1 that do not conform to required setbacks from newly detined let lines. a o *Cleaning/upgrading of e.xisting ditch that runs along the Luce Line adjacent to Coffin property. h.Replacing e.xisting 18" culven (to the west of the intersection of Luce Line and Old Crystal Bay Road) which is in disrepair with a 12" opening at inlet. Install a second higher culvert through Luce Line to act as an overflow or lower elevation of the Luce Line at this location providing applicant’s plans meet the requirement that slope is no greater than 1%. 1.Installing a new culvert under the horse trail in the area by the pond south of the Coffin property. The subdivider has posted a Letter of Credit in the amount of $308,122.50 to ensure that these required improvements are completed to City’s satisfaction. 12. 13. Payment to the City of a park dedication fee in the amount of $25,468.00. Payment to t.he City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $200.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves :he plat of Old Crystal Bay Road Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions; 1.The subdivider shall fence off the following drainfield sites prior to construction of roadway and drainage improvements and this fencing shall be maintained in place until lots are developed; Lots 1-6, Block 2, Lots 3-7, Block 3, Lots 1-10, Block 4. Erosion control shall be installed as shown on preliminary grading and drainage plans and maintained until natural groundcover is ••estored. Page 3 of 4 1 ir. rf. -■ •-♦1 .'It . reel). iform Line Luce ;ning south 50 to >n. and rono sota. nage CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^ ^ ^ --------- 4. 5. r- ■ „i.nc for public and private roads must be approved by the City approved, and a satisfactor>' road base completed. r rar:sr ato “project has been completed to ensure permitted sedtment storage capacity. The designated wetland within Lot 7, Block 4 must be installed prior to the installation of a driveway to t e si jj j. ^„iii be The future owner must obtain the required permit from the necessary to fill a protected mitigation area with the construction o t e e. The aforesaid Plat s^ be ,?|itr:er of blfo^^^^^^^^ 73 f o^fh" ^t^^a copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements, deeds and covenants noted above. Of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 2.rd day of May. 195^4. .\T7rEST: Dorothy M^llin, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ^ward j” C^han, Mayor ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) „j„ed before me on this 23rd day of May, 1994 moTAR^pSu C - M«N6SOTA ° HENNEPIN CWNTY •. V uv cMnmlssloo t • Notary Public Pa2e 4 of 4 i I ! I *■9^ biXA i . .v..o«iiaSfeAHde..A-. : ■" ^:ri ••1...i ■. ; :»..■■ r'''-;. ■ i.’;k :*i' OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD ADDITION kiDOOJQM.Hvh _______"• wr4 Wi/ •try r W c f /2/*".Vi^ sf.', . .^... „},./A/, -fj S - - - - . -.■'t^'^' i«"r- I '' MATCH UN€ D see StCET2 0F6SHiCT& V. VJ^.\ • 0> v>l m c ii^ \ • -> y\, yf ''l ‘ ^ .V •; /juuuU-r"1----1 Mt *• • u V *^ry **'’ niv &*A|>•1«l * * i xU «ik.A----------------- #ilV—*^*^^^*^* 1»» > • •-• •• •• •. M W •• • »••■ mt ••• * % -• • • « ■ A . • A :.'•*. COFFIN X GRONBERG. INC. SHEET 4 OF 6 SHEETS 0^ IML •« «««-» • J:1c*4Dr\ pa5»=^zTr \\\CMYtlAiV ,1 • « % .\-r I' •. >j-\ \. ■ s. yA . t'i ,f.-o^j—\'v'“:;^ MM^OMO tUMIViaiON KM TANDEM PROPERTIES m AuotToirs suwmvismm no. n* l«NHfKN COUNTV. MNNCtOTN •» *• . TV \ ‘ t' 1 rt^TB . yi.TW/ r-“ji_T“___I a,-:s • —s i I I • • •• • COFFIN PARCEL M •»• ••*<!IN « lUl INi\ CUft|\ & GR0\BIR(, IM PNOK>SCO SUNOIVItlON KM TANDEM PROPERTIES IN AUOITOirt MOINVItlON NO. 330 HCNNCKN COUNTY. MNNfSOTA M All niOO' I Mil ///ffl •9 Ml f3 4IO «■» moHMio tuKNvitlOw Fon TANDEM PROPERTIES OF OUTtOT A. COUNTRYSIDC MAMOM tNO AOOtTION. A TRACT A. KL.t.NO. WM HCNNCFM COUNTY. tMNNttOTA ^ CmftitJ tiu Hi. -rvMU 1.?'c r? --------- %hfmm tamtt DICKEY PARCEL INIII lAM mnAM , • Ia A A A■f ■ MyJ • « • • •» # •« ^m§ • • »4* •mfmmmmm*(OIII\ & (.KONHIU. I\(PROHMtD SUMOIVItlON POM TANDEM PROPERTIES Of OUTLOT A. COUMTMVtIOC MAMOM 2ND AOOITKHi 4 TRACT A. MLLt.Na 104f ________HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA__________ M«ii mn *4 U n-mt S»ll M* ; • •* m % ItA-All • ’ll I < •• •• •** . K 'J 'I HI .spill ^‘n^tjjfp ....■■; 2 t Dc k , / rjiteill I ■ V..; ■ 7^:;f’1 |j!^f%s &iei;v>'., • .:oi p -'-iF l|bv sVj,\ V^ > s . »x ’. !«3.ii^-^v%fe' » VJ^m^SS^B^ ^ >a! # /# ' * ^‘IkSI • ^ : S ■ RS-'-ky’ " • FM /ii liliiiijiSg:' ■ ; ; ^iiiir^'-in «£ 'Aq ^pjHfe'llf|f*; ^ w}if#'V. ^ A. ’ M a. . . . P mil totu o: tu Q. O !5r:c. tua V < h- o yo O i 'itelfe' ':j. *i;:aap5^m i r.k'.'*'-fe 't''' ■•'■■ifi i 4'vj iW IffiPtilSi :r»., 3raBRSSStk*jui£a« pts^pfei m SvS • • 'X .■ N- '^>''';: -------------1•''•.. , > ••;»,C;, • ^'»;^•'.’■ivj*'!’ 'Affr'^^:'■“'''.•;"~v“-~M»l i«, <11 ^n- viV.Tf «■ rs O XIr. 8 P.o co roa. s cn C nj 00 ”0c J3 CJ > *rjo ♦—tf rju O Bi lU i::o • » » rj «t C *4> Q tjs c:o rj !tH»j «>a•—• c:o n It: lO r1 u TJ 9 *o oR « yto ••J! •y §.o9 to •—» •3 u. H •*.: ■>. { V'- . # > I «I k.. . V » • . • . .4 S HAiaa MOIUM * N tn ‘s»\. « uj "1 \ \ V • I V* t ^ •/ - V I.V vA .•.-V .1 ».% % ..1 r iW:S • !*.».. • ?. ‘lU' »*» 4 S' ;• if- •■,:' . ; i r^« .a' • . i * >.-'■• '*<'v \ ‘’‘I• »* •' 'V •r • r ^ • 1 • ‘ . . / i •'-4*; {•.» 1 *» . • 1' T 1 i- ■) ;k ; .^ d ' • ■'" ; ;?.;4. Pv ft-V^ I-.N'ffi / y I iJ fAm ,iw‘ft-.;. -i IiLK*!;; SvjifeWtXi-Alii Ok fV4 Sx ■'«; S*^Pitj s avou Ava ivisauo ano tn UJ OH lU Q.o fit:a. 5 UJ Q 2 < H ozoa: O ao » ocou. O co s.B "uo TJ co 3u:: *wc fti*o co 3 IS U) u •o *3 Co t:o 0. UJ 4/»c CO •Dc Oi T3 Qi (Q U O 2 ♦3 ri 4 u Wi3. £ Us cn ooto liil I o> CO .s r ■M iN u Orono Limited Partners 2765 Casco Point Road, Wayzau, MN 55391-9798 • Ms. ^en B. Sones, Dist. Admin. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345-8244 received JUN 9 1994 CfVYOFOHONO June 7,1994 Re: Statement of Commitment Permit #94-14 Dear Ms. Sones, As requested the Orono Limited Parmership is providing a commitment statement regarding the replacement plan for wetland constructed on the 130 acres, 46 lot single family development in the City of Orono. Orono Limited Partners will construct the wetland areas approved by the M.C.W.D. in permit 94-14 and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers permit 94- 02434-NW-jJY beginning in June of 1994. Staff of F.J. Svoboda & Assoc, will assist in design and monitoring of construction in accord with current wetland design and construction standards. M.C.W.D. staff will be invited to inspect the wetland construction after rough grading and after revegetation. The wetlands will be protected with a drainage and conservation easment as required by the City of Orono and Corp of Engineers. The developer, Orono Limited Farmers, and staff of F.J. Svoboda will monitor the wetlands after 1 year with a brief report to the M.C.W.D. evaluating the wedands status. If the wedands require additional work the developer will repair or replace the non-functioning elements. Annual reports will be prepared for the M.C.W.D. for 4 years by the developer and consultant. Sincerely, Richard Putnam, Parmer Orono Limited Farmers cc. J. Mabusth J. Yanta F. Svoboda • • • * • -i • 1 I I i i H ^ A.. * I * r£^TiMTANDEMPROPERTIES_______BROKERS • PLANNERS • DEVELOPED James L. Ostenson Richard A. Putnam Mr. Joe Yanta St. Paul District, Army Corp of Engineers 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Re: Permit 94-02434-NW-JJY Dickey-Coffin sites June 2, 1994 Dear Mr. Yanta, ! am resDOiiding to the Corps' May 13,1994 permit letter - DeterminaUon: 3^FR 330-App.A. Nationv^de permit #(26). In dUcussing provisions rnrns Dormit wiUi vou. I said the reduction in proposed fill on lots irlmd IS^blMk 2 of the Dickey site would create “ construction and the permanent utalizaUons of die lots. The exhibit A iUustrates the proposed fiU rcducUon recommended by die Corps in Uie 5/13/94 permit. wortoblfforeither die homeoivner or the wedand. We believe that a 50 foot minimum is necessary for a reasonable transiuon. A«i vou know the fill area proposed on tliese lots is in Basin la, a f>'pe 2 ree^caimrass and disturbed community, degraded, se.m-permanent wedaiSl^gure 5-1 from F.J. Svoboda & Assoc., Inc. 7/29/93 re,wrt illustrates the area. Our development approach in tliis area was o minunize die encroachment by shifting roads and building siws ^.^rciMinE the better quality Type 1 and 2 wedands in the area, lou mil fiolfthe foad ^ for^ou 19.18. 17. 8. 9 & 10 cu.;ves between Type 1 wedands on either side of the street. We believe the site plan does a good job minimizing wetland disturbance. 2765 Casco Point Road • Wayzata« Minnesota 55391 • Office & Fax (612) 471-0573 7808 Creekridge Circle • Suite 310 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55439 • Office (612) 941-7805 • Fax (612) 941-7853 ^ .t. 40m mmM isonnam m 'n We ask the Corp to consider an enlargement of the fill to the limits proposed in exhibit B. The amount of fill is reduced by .25 acre from the original plan. The Corp's proposed fill boundary reduced tlie fill by .4 acre. The additional .15 of an acre of fill will provide a reasonable separation for wetland and home construction. In summary we ask the Corp to revise its permit to allow an additional .25 acre of fill in basin la from the approved permit of 1.78 to 2.03 acres for the total 130 acre site located in Orono, Minnesota. Sincerely, Richard Putnam Orono Limited Partners Enel: Exhibits A and B / / TO® UJ V) V) < o Uliil CZl I—1 r~p o o o A (ZZD 3219.6 STRUCTURES CONCRETE SLAB SWIMMING POOL RECREATION COURT ATHLETIC FIELD RECREATION AREA SIGNS TANK POLE STREET LIGHT utility box RAILROAD SIGNAL RAILROAD SWITCH GROUND CONTROL - VERT. GROUND CONTROL - HORTZ. INDEX CONTOUR INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR DEPRESSION CONTOUR OBSCURED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION Scale In Feet too 100 Conteur Inlarval 2* 200 4.i. O’t ^ V A M % ,V V *• •* «» ! 2. eOFFIM SfTp A msnjRBcn2 JS ■'■ ‘■** ’• ®«* <• Wch4MM^arf‘ |’2*‘ PorBeam « ■ !S2^ ! . Pof B~mM?*!!*"**?^ 19. Btodcl 7 ® *’• ‘•P* Btock 1 8 ‘*’ '■f!*/^- «. Block 1 4 ro. 8. VWedwid 11 «; Lot 11, Bkiek 1 4 roM B. JimSAU^OABEAS 1. Loti,Block 1 2. Lot 2, Block 1 3. Lots 2 &Z, Block 1 «■ !'5*f f®’ New ArrasS.Loto6 47,Blockl 8. Lot IS, Block 1 rLot8,Btock1 8. Lots 9.12.13, Block 1, 9- Lots 11,12. Block 1 10. Lot 20, Block 1, 11-tot 17, Block 1 Assess?*?” <-B8 + 0.89 =2.77 acres Total Ml«aled » 3.23 + 2.73 » 5.96 acres 0.18 acres 0.32 acres0.04 acres 0.07 acres 0.06 acres 0.13 acres ' 0.08 acres 0.04 scTif^ Total 0.89 acres 0.11 acres 0.15 acres 0.13 acres 0.78 acres 0.30 acres 0.06 acres 0.20 acres 0.50 acres 0.13 acres 0.20 acres 0.19 acres Total 2.73 acres If t; 1 I PW»M ffl ' iiWiMJiaU iw 11 iU 10.r .1A *J Im i o o»»‘ •. 1. * * 4A ' * » ■/ ' 4 4 4 4 4COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC.SURVrviNO. EMOINCsnMO *NC LAND PIAN n MO 4SX.A Tamarack avbnucU>NG LAME. MINK. «SM«473.4141 T/WDEM PROPERTIES WETLAND MITiGATiON SUMMARY FEBRUARY 10,1994 '41 ' 1. DICKEY SnE A. DISnjRBED AREAS 1. WeUuid 1 b; Lot 19, Blocic 2 2. WMandl c; Lots, Block2&road 3. WeliaitcJ 1 a; Lots 17,18, Biock2 4. Wattafid 2 a; tot 17, Block 2, S road 5. WeOand 14; Lot 2, Block 1, S road B. MfTlGATCD AREAS 1. Lots 8 S 9, Block 2 2. Lot 19, Block 2 3. Lots 18 S19, Block 2 4. Lots IBS 17. Block2 5. Lot 16. Block 2 6. Lots 3,5, 6,13, Block 2 7. Loti, Block 2 8. Lots 1-6, Block 1 0.12 acras 0.38acrts 1.11 acros 0.16 acres 0.11 acres Total 1.88 acres 0.48 acres 0.17 acres 0.18 acres O.IBacrss 0.15 acres 0.19 acres 0.38 acres 1.SO acres Total 3.23 acres Lf' r»<«V 'WW^-mf1 j MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345-1597office: (612)939-8320 tax: (612) 939-8244 DiSTRiCT AOUmiSTfUTOR: Ellen B. Sones BOARD OF MANAGERS: Thomas Maple, Jr.. Pres. • C. Woodrow Love • John E, Thomas Claf1(Son Undley • Thomas W. LaBounty • Martha S. Harttiel • Pamela G. BOxt \ NWATCnSNEO aOONOAflYUkKIMHiMeTOMIU bwhjsotawvm nay j, Psrait Application Mo. 94-14 > ^ . -A* ^► m ♦ Applicmat: Xtoeatioat PurposeI Zeadea Properties 2765 Casco Poiat Road trsfsate, NN 55391 \ City of Oroao, T117, R23, Sec. 4, HE 6 NW 1/4 Storawster aeosgeaeat sad wetlead replaceaeat plea involTiag coastructioa of 46-lot resideatiel subdivisioa. Deer Mr. Putnam: At the regularly scheduled April 28, 1994 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed along with the following exhibits: 1. Permit Application 94-14 received December 3, 1993. 2. Wetland Classifications, Identification and Delineation Report received December 3, 1993. 3. Letter from applicant's representative received December 16, 1993. 4. Letter from applicant's representative received January 26, 1994. 5. WCA sequencing and replacement plan information received February 9, 1994. Summary Revised Revised Wetland Wetland Wetland Revised Revised Slcimmer Revised 1994. of disturbed wetlands received February 10, 1994. Area 1 Drainage Summary received February 11, 1994. Area 2 Drainage Summary received February 11, 1994. Mitigation Summary March 7, 1994. replacement plan application received March 7, 1994. mitigation cross sections received March 7, 1994. Area 3 Drainage Summary received March 7, 1994. Area 4 Drainage Summary received March 7, 1994. weir designs received April 19, 1994. grading, drainage and mitigation plans received April 25, ^ Ci % } •* Permit Application No. 94-14 May 3, 1994 Page twoiSrS;.l”“ VhVappu«tl0„ p.ndl„, r.c.ipt .nd .t.ft 1. Erosion control for all construction entrances. 2. Statement of Commitment regarding success of the replacement plan. 3. Emergency overflow detail for second cell of Area 3 pond. The following conditions shall be placed on the permit: 1. The stormwater ponds shall be constructed prior to performing theother site grading. ^ 2. The stormwater ponds shall be re-excavated to design elevations after the project has been completed to ensure permitted sediment storage capacities. Advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been submitted, and you have been notified of permit issuance. fuj^her that the Board of Managers' decision to grant approval of the subject permit application shall not be effective until a copy of the decision Sincerely, Ellen B. Sones DiAtrict Administrator EBS/cr Jeanne Mabush, City of Orono Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg 0 ■4 Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 14, 1994 #1936 Charles E. Troyak, 2525 Kelly Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback variance required for proposed addition at west side of existing residence. Refer to Exhibit L. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 0-75’ setback area Allowed = 0 Existing = 4.24% 75-250 ’ setback area Allowed = 25% Existing = 20.49% Proposed = 21.74% 250-500 ’ setback area Allowed = 30% Existing = 3.91% No variance required. Lot coverage is not applicable as the area of the property exceeds 1.99 acres. List of Exhibits 3. 6V . f i Zoning File #1936 June 14, 1994 Page 2 L - Average Lakeshore Setback - Survey M - Floor Plan N - Elevations Description of Request Applicant proposes an approximate 15 ’ x 33’ addition to the west side of the existing residence consisting of an expanded famUy room and kitchen addition, new covered porch and entry. The majority of the structure will be located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The addition will have little impact on the residence structure to the west. The residence to the east side will not be able to view structure as it is entirely blocked by the Troyak residence. No other variances are required. Statement of Hardship Please review Exhibits A and B. Applicant notes that the following unique findings and hardships: 1. Home was constructed 85 years ago, prior to the current standards for shoreland development. 2. All current standards for development are met except for the average lakeshore setback standard. 3. The house to the west has no view windows on the west side. 4. The residence on the east will not see the addition as it will be placed entirely behind the existing residence. 5. There is a mature woods between the residence to the west and the Troyak residence. 6. Staff would add the curvature of the shoreline. Staff Comments In light of certain comments made by applicant to both Council and Planning Commission members, staff feels it necessary to make the following comments: To stafFs knowledge, the first person to view the March 1994 survey of the proposed improvements was the Building Official sometime after the filing of the May 2nd building permit application (review Exhibits H and I). The survey information was complete as staff had advised Mr. Troyak at the time he discussed his proposed improvement that the addition would also be subject to an average lakeshore setback. The need for the variance is not determined by the location of the addition as it relates '■-mm ♦ * <Zoning File #1936 June 14, 1994 Page 3 to the lakeside of the existing residence but to the location of the average lakeshore setback line. This is why staff asked that the residence structures on either side of the Troyak residence be shown on the survey. The applicant also questioned why the City staff would have issued a building permit for an addition on the same west side in 1988 never noting need for a setback variance. If you would review Exhibits J and L, the residence to the west was not constructed at that time. Staff only needed to consider the average lakeshore setback as it related to the house to the east. If a line was drawn from the front line of both the Troyak structure and the structure to the east, the proposed addition of 1988 would have had no impact. There is no doubt that the existence of the house to the west has a major impact on the Troyak property as far as it relates to the average lakeshore setback line. As promised, staff will schedule the application before the June 27th meeting of the Council in order to expedite the review of this application. » \\ ■ -V. r llMIMIIMi ..........................■*- 1 A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIONInitial Application Fee S200.00($50.00 per each additional variance)Renewal Variance Fee $100.00(no change from original application) Variance for non-confonning structures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) !• V rrTV nc nrjnynI I u*f cnuiti/ .CYXiAkfrC nrrrrrI jtivnMwu «.'! I a i/k. a vv'wv Ai rrx!va tfuM rjir-K U l • w Tr»t*i ycrcTDT^TuAiJk'' vnnf^L.wi.af » ftirtifM f c*uPROPERTY INFORMATION r , ^ ' -w'™’'' I -.6Site Address hu^^ . eyg^el^cor g^T33/-—JL-- Property Nnmher fP.l.DA I g(o4fc g '70TfMatl4. .o^cat.n if not ^ Wondt/yesr) I (do) (d^^it) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: u residential ___other (specify)___-------------------------— Zoning District:^------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ applicant ^ Name <^i/i/Lirt65 g. Address: ^^^5-City: Phone (home) ^7 / -7 3 3 / Phonefwork) ^ 7 */ - 5*^( r______Zip: 5iT33/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ____________________ Phone(home) Phone (work)_ .Address:City:Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail:__ 4 Estimated Construction Cost $ aa^fiJLSA.€/i _________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width v/ Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore _ Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPmN OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ^ Describe undue hardshii, or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preven^g compliance with Zoning Code requirement: <Qoir—hffVK/ r 1^ Q ® ^ Manure' ^ I ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) i ✓ -t(u- ktru-<-c, dCiAuL ^ it? 6\p-^Hm.eT fvnc<>c^ -h -iCtu^ Vjc^t^ --fmjur \fcaA<^ Vjic, ]f\jb MumdUruu^ crvc cuk A- U jlc vvJdo^'5 b^;ftcre.fc4>-' -11a lutnx<;-t -h) \aa U "j%a*?T r B\ required submittals . ------ "T .he jltot date u. fAr vmir anoliraHon to be considered complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. of owners wii^ 150’ (you Hennepin County Department of Finance. A-603, Govt Center, 348-3171). Ce«S “or'fu?vir(s^^d^n'nceSed sutveyoO^ x'^rfoJ calculatioDS as required. In addition, prov.de one (1) copy 8^ x 11 for iS;"” survey (existing and P-PO»d 'ievanonsMf any c^g^ grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) “Py 7,,^. , n'-y vou wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City start. ^S^c'T^UrexpTn^s incurred in review of tins application and certiftes that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowle ge. — Pate " V S" OWNER’S SIGNATURE II, I‘1‘i4 OWNER’S SIGNAT^ application and further authorizes reasonable -c».. me^rs for purp^ of investigation and veriftcatton of tins request. Owner’s Signature Date this change prior to the meeting. 8 ( .i • . ,*at T. ^ "Ax^ -‘^ • H May 11, 1904 ■Hi Cl c Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Jeanne, We would like to apply for a variance for our proposed addition to our home at 2525 Kelly Avenue. We understand that we need to appear before the Planning Commission, whose next scheduled meeting Is June 20. Because we have a unique situation, we would like to request to appear at the optional meeting scheduled for June 6, or more preferably a special hearing. Our 85 year old home meets all the requirements for setback from the lake and for hardcover. However we understand that we need a variance because of line of sight with adjacent neighbors. If you were to see the placement of the homes on either side of us. It would be clear that our proposed addition does not affect either one. The house to the east of us will not see our addition. The house to the west of us was built four years ago and has no windows on our side, and has woods between us. We purposly planned the new addition within the confines of our existing structure, so as to avoid any question of field of vision. Our addition will be 165”^ from the the neighbors on the west, and 68' from our property line along the line of site, and 33' from the property line at the nearest point. The neighbors to the east will not see our addition. Because our home was here long before the other homes, we feel that we have a unique situation and would like for you to see It. In addition, we have the approval of both neighbors. Our building plans are now on hold. We have hired our builders and they await notification from you to begin. We would very much appreciate being considered for the optional meeting on June 6, or more preferably a special hearing. Sincerely, ki/aU* uCharles E. Troyak a 9 l I j .■ HI d 'A. _ _,A,'^r ,1^MN MTC OS/ll/M •ATCH 00*HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORtunON SYSTEN PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT HO. PIASSAOI PACE 10PROP ADOR OMCR NM« TAXPAYER NMC/AOM SO E0-117-ES 11 0007 0E5A0 KELLY AVE KIRK K NELSON KIRK K NELSON tSAO KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR NN BSS51 PROP AOOR OMNER NAHE TAXPAYER NRNi/AOOR SO E0-117-.:S 11 OOSE OOOSO AOORESS UNASSICNEO 1ST NATL OANK OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL OAMC OF NAVARRE P 0 SOX lES NAVARRE m sssn PROP ADOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO E0-117-ES 12 00S9 0252S KELLY AVE K A OENSON A J L OENSON KEITH A A JANET L OENSON 2S2S KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN S5SS1 11 PROP AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR TOTAL OATCH OOA 00009 SO 20-117-2S 11 0022 0252S KELLY AVE C E A H C TROYAK CHARLES E TROYAK 2525 KELLEY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55SS1 SO 20-117-2S 11 002S 02595 KELLY AVE N SHIT JR A 0 C SHIT NEIL SHIT JR A OAROARA SNtT 2595 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR HN 55SS1 SO 20-117-2S 12 00S7 02509 KELLY AVE C A C NAOLER CHARLES A CANOICE NAOLER 2509 KF*•^ AVE EXCELSIOR MN S:.>S1 SO 20-117-2S 12 OOSO 02515 KELLY AVE J A J FOLIN JOHN E A JEAN C FOLIN 2515 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR Ml -55SS1 • • • '* .* * • «•. •0 * ftJ •! \*0 0 V . *jJ>* 1f1• .J*>•»•• .0•• • 1 • '• *%* •• /•0 (• t > . 1 SO 20-117-2S 12 009A 02505 KELLY AVE PETER CHON NARY HANA6NENT PO 255 CHANHASSEN Ml 55S17 SO 20-117-25 19 0019 02595 KELLY AVE EVERETT J SCHROEOER • E J SCHROEOER 2595 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN B5S51 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE MEM«P1M COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE REST OP MV KNOHLEOGE AND RELIEF, t _ DATI pflwrrr-^ iw 0.42 ^•49V6*I 4 i: % Jr ^ Q\\o W4 i!f ^1' May 19, 1994 Mr. and Mrs. Charles E. Trovak 2525 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Re: Variance , .—N /f~‘^X ^GITYof ORONOMunicipal OfficesStreet Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 ' , i* V, r iShiiL Dear Mr. and Mrs. Troyak: The Planning Commission considered your request to schedule your variance application at their special meeting of June 6. 1994 to consider a zoning amendment to B-2 Zoning District. In a 3-3 vote the Planning Commission was unable to affect a legal vote. Your application will be scheduled before the Planning Commission at their June 20th meeting and staff will schedule your application before the Council at the June 27th meeting. By placing your application on the June 27th Council agenda, you will sustain only a two week delay than if you were approved for a more abbreviated review. You are advised to file your building permit application now so that a permit can be issued on June 28th for the proposed new construction. Prior to the June 20th meeting of the Planning Commission, you will receive a copy of the agenda and the staff memo reviewing the proposed variance. Please feel free to contact staff if you have any questions concerning the review comments in that memo. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/ch 5323 0066 I . Ik—• I/ /-* V . V :yAdjacent Property C:vncrs’ Acknowledgement FormI (we) -----of ^^13 KelLu A)f^...[punt address][print name(s)]have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ^z^2.«T also referred to as Land Use Application No.________.I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for *e City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date DatePropifirty Owner ♦^♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦#i*.****#********************************************************* I (we) A/(^i ^ f jifcxJ"t" [print name(s)] of /h/f^ [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at zb lip l^lluj /h/^ also referred to as Land Use Application No.------------. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. 0¥aiti Property Owner If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of thw Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days pnor to ^e scheduled meeting date. Date MAjy, Date ' niMHii fi iK I I li I I ’ • ~ I I ^ ^ A/ ^ V4c^HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEETSETBACK zone: (CIRCLE 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000'Existing Hardcover in ZoneA, ■ House length WIDTH S.F. S.F, J-2 j- } ■1 S.F. if ■A ^v/ v m B. Garage . c. Driveway D. Sidewalk ______ WooO 2 / 2 / E. — X Patio / ” D eck Or<CkL C/\t*oi*j^ F.Landscape uy croHf^ IQt; G. Other X _ 4.2 4.1 '2 AREAS ^rcr.' V Jt ? ?UNDERLAIN 3Y . ______________ X PLASTIC ^ ^ -------------- SHEETING rr —-------------- X ________<ircWfjjar •'Xn» ly L/ Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone ^8 88 I >' 9^ '^O n ^S9 S.F S.F. S.F. :_lis.f. • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F 6 fo> 800 t ,.p. X xoo - «*r- ;•mm. t 1 A. ‘ H ouse f^OC>< QotiCiiZ On Wftr Co*JC- U/Atl Oaj Wfcr. foit' c/f LENGTH WIDTH .30 - X Bt Garage '^LACK.rvfi c. D riveway Cffur, cu4ti /. <r ly i. s 0. Sidewalk i /> €fJ ^0*o€. CtA8 •J yv// j E. Patio / D eck 7.5 F. Landscape ______ areas UNDERUIN _ _ BY , FUSTIC SHEETING /7 c. Other - X I „ [ H/c • •f^7S yO 7^3 Total Hardcover in Zone Total Property Area in Zone f4,2ao//,/o? j.ni •f V 5-^ loo 2S7S 8 zs S.F. S.F, S.F. S # F • • S^(70 S/ 72" /i70 _ S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. S70 96 S.F. S.F -T - <' - / YHARDCOVER CALCUUTION WORKSHEET •SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE one) 0-7S'500-1000' ^Existing Hardcover in Zone - - S.F. I A I ££l2£2-s.p. Fb ■■ X 100 - T Z/. 74 % ) T / ''O. o\11 WM r^'- GITYofORONO Municipal Offices Street Address; 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address; P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 May 9, 1994 Mr. Charles E. Troyak 2525 Kelly Avenue Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Re: Building Permit Application Dear Mr. Trovak: A review of your building permit application finds your proposed addition does not meet an a erage lake^hore setback as required by Orono Municipal Code Section 10.56, Subd 16 (C)(6) nZl V‘^•oser to the lake than your proposed addition, any new work is required to meet setbacks. Your options arc to 1) redesign your addition to meet setbacks or 2) request variance aonroval for your pro^sed location. Enclosed is a variance application for your review. Please'^Lvise me on your decision as soon as possible to prevent further delays. Sincerely, Lyle Oman Building Official LO/ch Enc. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6) Variance Application Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 —-.tai- i * tH. wr .4 >*1r ‘ ■“j« • f >\ ? » ■r iMv ' i »CITY OF 0R0r40 *»•'t . •• I i \t • • ^ •%i.• >. ...» V...»^ •Site address i M • • V • • f •. i'4 ; ..•» •; I'.• i 1 • • • • • • DESCRIPTION:»r fc 1 1 ,. .1; • • 1 1 iVf r‘'>5 «■ f" i t i f w<M'k I Kkt' ••>■■ Oc >rtov I »'»4C ti•:*<■• 1 * P lan Ix CVIcU only Imu . .*>•*! I • ’»*? L.r<-iB RE..1ARKS:•• • • *«w . ricr.rii/rvvij.;. ?. khmild ‘ • • V h NO [• L . wl** • • • •« • EE . SUMMARY V* iL U h • I ^A i‘."I t. w* • • • .w . M c* 1 f i*** I I/O . .Viil .i V: • . • . . Cl# V :* CONTRACTOR: — Amp'll CnCit — CiiARLE'v »;LuLY AVt cxca.iio.^ UN '.f.- f. » • •• . • • • Tht Uf^OERSlGNEO hereby REQUESTS FtFHlOSION TO MAKE THE REAL IttERWEMENTb IpEC^lED WORK iU S;TRK:T «*«fi-IA»4CE W TH Al^ OF OR^D ORDINANCES STATE OF MlNNcSOfA BUILDING CuOE kEOUIREHEN S. ^/a / •.A» ♦li . Vi*. * *\i—r\j I.-': r»rtTf~«»r r~i nTi iiftf Tiaf i ~*^ .: nc:^—"'" ■iwHiiiii?"*'’' \ \ v_^\-. -'-nx^ic /'*'< / -*O' \ V.... 7 V3 I r s From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmcmbers Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building &. Zoning Administrator Jun* 13. 1994 #1937 Herben F. and Erika Kahicr, 2725 Rriney Road - Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.03. Subdivision 14 (D) - Side and rear setback variances required for 60’ x 120’ tennis court. Required = 30’ Proposed rear = 10’ Proposed side = 10’ Variance = 20’ or 66.6% The propert>’ is located out of the shoreland area beyond the 1. Maxwell Bay and French Lake Upper Basin. ’ setback from List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners ’ List C - Plat Map D - T. Betz Letter. Builder, 5/10/94 E - Vickerman Letter 5/25/94 (neighbor to east) F - Hust Letter 5/25/94 (neighbor to immediate south) G - Neighbors ’ Acknowledgement Forms (9) H - Survey I - Site Plan Description of Request Review Exhibits A and D. In 1990/91 the owners of the property developed the site with the full intent to install a conforming tennis court in the southeast rear yard. The owner ’s letter suggests that in 1990 the code would have required only a 10’ side or rear setback. The comprehensive amendment of the accessory structure code was completed in August of 1989 and at that time a 30’ rear and side setback was established. r Zoning File #1937 June 13, 1994 Page 2 Review Exhibits E and F, neighboring propeny owners receiving the most impact from the tennis court have all submitted'approval letters supporting the proposed improvement. Approximately nine neighboring propenj' owners were notified of the improvement and the City has received no negative comments from the neighbors along Rainey Road. Steve Weckman has review'ed the proposal, specitically to address the proposed setback of the tennis coun from the toe of the mound system. Although the survey would suggest there is a 10’ setback (code requires 20’ setback), the toe of the mound is actually more like 5-6’ from the proposed north side of the tennis coun, review Exhibit H. Weckman advises that he would approve the substandard setback from the toe of the mound if applicant can provide adequate separation distance so that drainage from the tennis court can be directed away Ifom the toe of the mound. Applicant must provide detailed grading/drainage plans with building permit confirming drainage is directed away from mound system. Statement of Hardships Please refer to Exhibits A and D. It is not clear when the builder was made aware of the new setback requirements for oversized accessory structures such as the tennis court but the code was amended in August of 1989. At the time the home was constructed, the new ordinances were in effect. As with all new ordinances, it takes time for builders and residents to be made aware of the new standards. Staff would add the following unique findings or hardships: 1.The unique shape of lot noting the platted corridor along Rainey Road providing additional area for alternate septic site. 2. Topography to west prevents tennis court from being moved more to the center of the rear vard. 3. Need to place court in a north/south alignment. 4. The location of the mound in the northeast side yard. Issues for Consideration 1.If the toe of the mound is located approximately 5* from the proposed north side of the tennis court structure, would members approve further encroachment ot the rear yard? should structure be reduced in length providing adequate room to complete required drainage improvements? Zoning File #1937 June 13, 1994 Page 3 2.Although neighbors to the east and north have approved substandard setbacks, should applicant provide plantings along the east and south sides ot the tennis court? 3. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Any condition of approval must include requitement that the existing mound system be fenced off and protected during the period of constniction of the tennis court. Applicant shall provide deuiled grading plans vi ith building permit ensuring that drainage is directed away from toe of mound. L CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION I Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $-00.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) OO A 7a I T • 'u.'- • UrJi I I Wl iT rX•' nr z* nCC Tr^c» xftr»itv.u. c*i I xww. * r** I* ’** ^’ k * I Ti :f rf ri » a w'w^Vi;. V'WV'V* rexi X V.*UM ^VV'* “Lw»*X‘ M *.'»•*» U I Uk iV t U W V' V • - • ^ AM m m ..k. i. ! L* r «. • W »4’V VM- *%u.uwif f r u*v PROPERTY INFORMATION .......... cv- A^Hr^c^^2_S A:A-L.>Vb-Y L> 1..^ -r t -------l Property Identification Number (P.l.u.).~ ~ ^ g(/sur^v' ~_____if nrtt nc udcd on requu-ed survey. t •. T*frPw‘VTw‘C'V ^wx ovx t\ m V UA'iiATA ri'-^ r-TT91 •”»* . Property Identificauon iNumocr ^r.i.v^./-----u" Atta^hjegaljlescr^tio^^ to on required sur^ey. Date Propel^ AcquiredPropel^ 1 ixv^ --------------------------w Present use Of property: Zoning District: ______________ APPLICANTlc.4M.LEe. AHdress: 7~V'Lr <? 4X.s;EV AO OWTNTER (if different than applicant) Name _______________________ Address: description of reqltst _ _________ r~ omcr ibpcuiiv; __________________ Phone (home) 9 Phone (work)C|-^l -IH IL> Citv: |J4V'>4-T>1 Zip: rr29l Phonethome) Phone (work) Citv;Zin: Estimated Construction Cost $>o, poo CC’U (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARLANCES REQLTRED Lot Aea _ X Setback: Lot Width Front y Side Hardcover Lot Coverage X Rear Average Lakeshore ____Other (specify) compliance w.da Zoning Code requiremencs:_l ^ fT ~ _l, ' ■ —..S' ’•0_t c~> ^attach additional sheets if necessary) ' --0-- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 8. 9. Completed Application Form ^ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’ (you must obtain this hst from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). X Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8‘^" x 11" for y Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'^" x 11" for reproduction.^^ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8',i" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. Tliis would include name(s) ot applicant(s) if not current owner(s). y As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City suff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember ^at your vnrinnrp .nnolicntinn is not coinplete if the above information ha.s not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE . The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Adminisirator. agrees lo pay additional fees (staff lime not covered by origmal fee parent) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that information supplied is true an^orrw^tjo^^ best of his/her kno\^dge^^^^^ Applicant’s Signature -------------^ OWNER’S SIGNATURE . ., The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, apnts. Commission members, and Council members for purppses of inve^ti|ati^^i^^^erification of this request.^ ;>4'/‘rv Owner’s Signature ____________Date t! ‘Z.------wmMmmm this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE OS/QS/9%MC^#«PIN COUNTY PROPERTY IWOIMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LISTBATCH 010PROP AOOROHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO 0A-117-2S S4 OOOS 02011 EARVIEH LA E J TOTH « G V TOTH EOMARO J • 6ERDA V TOTH 2011 FARVIEH U LONG LAKE MN 5SS5APROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 0A-117-2S AS 0012 02725 RAINEY RO H F KAHLER A E KAHLER H F KAHLER A E KAHLER 2725 RAINEY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 0A-117-2S AS 0015 027S0 RAINEY RO MARK 6 FOX A MARY-STUART FOX MARK 6 FOX 27S0 RAINEY RO HAYZATA MN 55S91 PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 0A-117-2S AS 0010 OOOAO AOORESS UNASSIGNEO RAINEY HANNAH ANOERSON RAINEY HANNAH ANOERSON ISO GROVELANO TER MPLS ni 55A0S PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR TOTAL BATCH 010 00012 SO OA-117-23 AS 0007 00790 OLD CRYSTAL DAY ARTHUR M BLAIR ETAL ARTHUR BLAIR 790 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN S5S91 RO SSO 0A-117-2S AS OOlS 02A05 RAINEY RO R S A S S VICKERHAN R SCOTT VICKERHAN SUSAN s vicker:ian 2A05 RAINEY RO HAYZATA MN 55S91 SO 0A-117-2S AS 0014 02490 RAINEY RD M H SMITH SCO SMITH M H SMITH ICO SMITH 2490 RAINEY RD HAYZATA MN 55391 SO 09-117-23 12 0001 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO GIB HUST GEORGE A HUST 820 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RO HAYZATA MN 55391 report no. PlASSAOl PAGE 25SO 0A-117-2S AS 000000020 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RO SGIB HUSTGEORGE A HUST020 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROHAYZATA MN 55S91SO 0A-117-2S AS OOIA 02770 RAINEY RO RICHARD K HYSOCKl ETAL RICHARD I APRIL HYSOCKl 2770 RAINEY RO HAYZATA MN 55S91 •o’SB 0A-117-2S AS 0017 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO TREES TO BE PRIVATE RO ASSOC TREES TO BE ASSOCIATION 2770 RAINEY RO HAYZATA MN 55S91 3S 09-117-2S 21 0001 00825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO S J M I E J DAYTON JUDSON H DAYTON TCF TONER §840 MPLS tM 55A02 \ . • . ’ ’ ‘ w • \ • f j' ? I 4 • 4 •• w • ♦, »!•a**ic:ii;•• ^ j o:- n (<0)•>■ r-c (9)ns'iyt.•\, t- »««'•i i' iH •‘S’ ■t 5 ’<f ,.v iM /I 75. (Jo) (2) '? ’•? i; 41 cT-a ^ 8 C« ^1 ■«V^ ; •* ■ *■* .'•• •ai of. 10! sj '•r *r« ««• •UIT y ^0* »ft J7) «• • *" 4 / / ^— JC ........% . ■ ■/ ^ ®5 i» y /-V j- —/ /S-: ' • r5 f '117'as- ;3) '•i) 5-“ 1 :C3 .•■ *♦ i) F * 1’ nra-at.ri-rfcr-rni it-ifj b U 7T 1 O^ \ j7a 4148 Hillcrest Road Wayzata MN 55391 May 10, 1994 City Orono Build’ j and Zoning Office P 0 Box 66 Crystal Bay Mn 55323 Attention:Jeanne Mabush Building and Zoning Admini Re:Variance Application for 2727 Rainey Road Orono MN When Herb and Erika Kahler contracted with me in August of 1990 to purchase the land and to build their house at 2725 Rainey Road, they requested that the house siting, septic system and landscaping contemplate the subsequent construction of a tennis court. This was done after I sited the tennis court for them with the proper north' south orientation in the southeast corner of their lot, taking Into con­ sideration a 10’ set back on the side lot line along the rear lot line which was the building code requirement at that time. Sin^rely, Tom Betz President Betz Builders, J± r*4 O <U 4 May 2b, 1994 City of Orono BuiJding and Zoning Office W- are neighbors o£ the Kahler s. Their side iot line is Soeine^vrrrpi-sed to hare the Kahier s build a tennis court ten (10> feet from their side Lot. Sincerely yours. Susan (t Scott Vickerman 2685 Bainey Rd. Waynata. Mn 55391 .ff-...X.. r r ' ' _ “• ;^ X o i Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form j I (we) -:3“onSQ/0 of 3^ /^>9V /^/) [print name(s)J [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 21lS~ ^4ZA-ft V also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we'i am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner 0y4i ler f 19 ■ 9v Date Property Owner .5- Date I (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ______also referred to as Land Use Application No. ,_____. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and Lhat the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. i' : J ■ »«ti r ft iJ O ^ Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form I (we) [print namc(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 2 >2.r H.ATsJSH ^tlso referred to as Land Use Application No.------------• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for |hc City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date DateProperty Owner ***♦♦♦♦♦.****-.**♦***************••♦*•••••***•*•................••♦*•****•♦•♦*♦♦♦♦♦♦*•*** I (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located _____also referred to as Land Use Application No.-------------• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for ^he City Council that 1 (we) am (are) aware of die improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property O^er /s. - Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this ^d Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days pnor to the scheduled meeting date. - -> • « ^ 41 Adjac^i^ropertJ Owners’ Ackno^edgcment Form have reviewed d« plana for the proposed taprovemen. or Proposed use of the property located art also referred to as Und Use Appltcatton No.------------• I (we, understratd that in executing ^ “^o'ci't; ?o?n^irr(tra^‘Tarawlr: of P>- and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requl ;s Council approval. Property Owner Date f/4/ have reviewed ±e plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use ofhate mvimye^^m^ ^ ^ of the property located I (we) understand that in executing this for mfcity declare approval or nians and that the proposed neighbor ’s Council that I (we) am (are) aware of tlic Ua.pro .......m :> project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date to the scheduled meeting date. rm . - # I** \ ^ - ci,«- 'Sm,^ ^ ^ Adjawnt Pr.p«rty Owners' Acknowledgement Form of ___^ T o^rt I (we) at ?~Tz,s ku _---------- I (we) understand that in executing meX^^ f"' declare approval 3°^^[,f„f,he ta^r^ernent plans and that the proposed neighbor Council mat l twc; am v«‘-/ project or use requires Council approva . I (we)[print name(s)][print address] I (we) understand that in executing r rdram ^rr^arf of ^/Lfpro-ventent plans and that the proposed neighbor s nroiect or use requUes Council approval. Date Property Owner Date Land UseProperty Owner AppHcarn ”ub»Toufcol1or^ ^e1u«Zoni^^O^fire^tkas. .0days prior to the scheduled meeting date. .so. k' U •"Adjacent Property O^vners’ Acknowledgement Form [print namc(s)] [print address] / '-:x ^ j I (we) 6 have reviewed the plans tor the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located /t^iygx /to also referred to as Land Use Application No. ------------• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to project or use requires Council approval. ill 11 Property Owner Date Property Owner Date ♦***<i<i***<i******************<"»*********’*' 1 (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No.________• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (arc) aware of tlie improvement plans and t..at the proposed neighbor project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least ays prior to the scheduled meeting date. V 4 V. 77 -.4 a / ,■» 7 Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form I (we) SecH 5jn \j.' C feyof /^d. [print namc(s)) [print address] ' have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at /gAr/v/gy ltd also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in e.xecuting this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor ’s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date ♦***♦*#♦*♦♦***♦♦♦*♦**♦*****♦**#♦•♦♦♦••*••••*•••*••***•*♦*••*♦*•*****♦*♦**♦♦*** I (we) [print name(s)j [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (arc) av.are of the irnprove.T.ent plans and that the proposed neighbor ’s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. A:* . < N, I I i ^ r •4 ,v y Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement Form [print addtessl iprini - 'i's?.r=ut: Kisrit!!!:: . T /...„\ not asked to 2.tZ.^ -------- 1 (we) understand that in ^oy^o^'S'^TmereV to confmn for Ihe City Co?nc%rr(tra^‘Tarratt: of Jimprovement piaa, and that the proposed ne.ghbor project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Y Datnr...................... I (we)[print address] [pniU Uaui'-v.a/J have reviewed the plans for U« Ap^cmioTNo-'''^ ’’ at_________________ . . . ■;;;;;^.nd that in executing Z declare approval « dis>PPro« proposed neighbor s Councii mat I (wc; am v-r>.) - project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner • t m il AppUearn”ub“ to the scheduled meeting date. Date I I < i ...y»At^.#yiwj> - have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the propert>' located at also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. /f Date Property <i>wner Date of _____I (we) [print name(s)l [print addressl have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at __________________also referred to as Land Use Application No.________. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for ^e City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor’s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date DateProperty Owner If you ha,^e any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building «Sc Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. f I # f Adjacent Property Owners’ Acknowledgement term ($• I (we) - flOTT //c'T- '9' of /» (print name(s)l [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located J, > Rtzjj p-r CO also referred to as Land Use Application No.------------■ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (ar^ not «ked to project or use requires Council approval. ^•_ L.' i- ** • l^operty Owner /Date Qt^oL^ ly 7 SI/jhjL /^ro()erty Owner '^♦♦♦*********#******‘*****’* Date ' ^ ♦♦•♦♦♦♦n.*********-****************............****♦♦♦♦*♦♦ I (we)of (print name(s)](print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or ^ also referred to as Land Use Application No.-----------.• Uv _________ - I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not ^ked to project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date AppILrn.7a“mb"^^^^ to the scheduled meeting date. .1^ ft i (CERTIFICATE OFi SURVEY FOR THE mHiLERS OF LOl 1. BLOC]< 1. TREES TO BE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA 1 ■WAyyaoMMiih I \ 'V. \ D«Ai«y /-•JO' ■voaoN OATt oodumoN i See dkAifV MUjOO LEGAL DESCKIPnOU OF PREMISES SUWVEtEDt Lot 1. llocL !• TREES TO BE. . This survey Intends to show the bounderles of the Above described property, the locetion of en eiiit* ing house thereon, end the proposed locetion of e proposed tennis court. It does not purport to show eny other iaproveoents or oncroechoentt. 0 Iron oarker Bearings shown are based upon an assuaed datua. S’ t/*O O COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC. C hiiul Sf<m i.’i'r>, Sih' ninnh f> ls2 l.im.u.uk A\nuii‘ • lon^ M\ M2 171 11-11 IhmbrcrrtifrlhalthlsamwywasprrMivdbf worwnJfvairdbKlaipvf vMoa. and Ihiu I am a diiK leglilrnd Civii Ci^lnm and Land Suna|« uMM ll« latm cl llw S4alv d MranoU MaAlCwwbyiiBwmrtiliPBaiWwaiasTO . - V »r#a . . I I .»■» .yjt.. » *» • • ■ SCAU $*‘3er QAfl #*1#^ laewT \ To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator June 13, 1994 #1938 Douglas and Karen Olson. 537 Park Une - Variances - Public Hearing I ’ f I i.y «rv* Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - Street setback Required Existing = Proposed Variance = 35' 13’ (travelled road 42’) 16’ (travelled road 52’) = 19’ or 54.2% Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover. 75-250’ setback area = 11,220 s.f. Allowed = 2.305 s.f. or 25% PYkfino = 1 691 38 s f. or 15.01% . Proposfd = 3.526 s.f. or 31.4% (addition of 269 s.f. of lakeshore steps and retaining walls located wi*in 75-250’ setback area) Variance = 721 s.t. or 6.42% Section 10.56. Subdivision 16 (C) (2) - Bluff setback variance. Required - 30’ Deck = 0-2 ’ Principal strucwre = 6’ 4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Lot coverage. p"°(i^«V=^2*5^VsX or'l3^5% (296 s.f. of deck included as applicant proposed railings)’*' Review Exhibit F*. elevation of lakeside of residence. Note an up^r level deck wouiTb; included within lot coverage inventory. Property would be allowed an additional 277.3 s.f. or 1.5%. f ! ¥ { •'--ir. .-I 2^ning File #1938 June 13, 1994 Page 2 List of Exhibits g Application Applicants ’ Addendum Property Owners ’ List Plat Map Hardcover Worksheets Floor Plans Elevations Existing Site Plan Proposed Site Plan Average Lakeshore Setback sed Defcription of Request Applicants propose the demolition of the existing residence and construction of a two- storv residence structure that would be located 16’ from the street lot line requiring a street setback variance and setback variance from the bluff as structure will be located anyw^here from 0-6 ’ from top of bluff. Hardcover within the 75-250 ’ setback area exists at 15.01% and is now proposed at 31.4% requiring a 6.42% hardcover variance, more than doubling the size of the existing improvement. Review Exhibit A-1, applicants ’ addendum. Applicant notes the excessive right-of-way dedication at the street side of the residence shown at an 80 ’ width and the location of the travelled road from the street lot line. Applicant notes some 2800-1- s.f. of additional area between travelled road and street lot line that provides additional absorption area tor hardcover. Based on the existing and proposed final elevations, all drainage trom the new improvements will be directed towards street. Review Exhibit 1. the proposed improvements will not visually impact existing residences on either side, note residence to south has been constructed within upper elevations of bluff. Applicant also notes that all other required setbacks have been met. Note grade level deck at southwest comer is not required to meet a 10 ’ setback but can be located as close as 5’ to lot line. Applicanl has also advised that there may be a need to excavate at the southeast comer of proposed residence in order to provide positive drainage towards street. Applicant intends to install a swale. Issues for Consideration 1 Is the 6 42% increase in hardcover reasonable tor property at 18,849 s.f.? Note applicant has not provided hardcover facts within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Staff will ask applicant to provide this information for the meeting in order to determine it there are improvements that can be considered for removal. ma- Zoning File <^1938 June 13, 1994 Page 3 AUhouch a street setback variance is required, travelled road is some existing improvement. Would Planning Commission encourage street so that structure could be moved further away trom top ot blult and positi drainage to street maintained without disrupting bluff area? 3.Is the project overly ambitious for this property? Note there ts no need for a to coverage variance. The severe sloping topography has forced all structural m.provements to the more gentle sloped areas further east and closer to the street. 4.Staff has had an opportunity to view this property at the top of the blult ^d from the lake Mature veget^ion w^uld screen any improvement placed close to the top ot the bluff meeting the intent of the ordinance. 4 mm. CITY OP ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATIOH Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varia; Renewal Varian'c Fee $100.00 (no change * com original application) Variance foi non confozTning use $200.00 - Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION - ^ f*r •’'“•ra/Abra I I i/I i/iTcftvL rAi.-^vrc a w'w'Vib v'v W'v .»»■ f dJ -"CAV a v.«wi t w' V ?‘*LrrV Ti •**,'*. • >-* CTZ*T^^'UA\i’v v*“ I f/7nAv\ »w ” *!*■*» i f^ w‘ v» w* a V V w V V' a »% v ^ , Site Address M/i:' LaJ c/cProperty Identif. Number (P.I.D.) ,g 5 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survLey. Date Propsr^ Acquired. /- ^4 _ _ _ _(month/year) I {do)i:So not)) also own the ^adjacent parcels of land. _ _ _other(specify)Present use of property: Zoning District; /residential APPLICANT Name Phone (home) ^37- SciiO Phone (worlc) Q Address; ^^5^City; jO^JP/S_________ Zip; SS~^S OWNER (if different than applicant)Phone (home) Name Phone (wor)c) Address;City:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Zip; DESCRIPTION OP REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ J)^0 OOOJ- Describe request in detail; Hl?esT SlhS' }^40C A \ - VARIANCES REQUIRED _ _ Lot Area Setback;1//I Front Lot Width — 7— pother (specify) |S / y Hardcover _ 2^^® _ _ Rear _ _ Average Lakeshore Lot Coverage S-CtLi^ci ’ hardship/description OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual propert compliance with Zoning Code requirements;__ _ 3 I/ f HP ntjilkinII Ut C/IICfltW rfCTTrc wVv ni rnj r‘ir,\ V'.A •-•L.H 7L '*I fc. H,w*V'TyT^rL/^i/.v* vr ill I / ;n#ti V / U' » i ! . f *V uwi , V*// gi'S r^s 700 ^CcJl^fL. (attach additional sheets if necessary) rbqoired SOBMITTALS ,1 All of the following infonaatioo Mast b« gutaaitted by the *PP**.5S*h±gS. dragline date in order for your application to be considered coapletcx 1. X. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150* (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center .348-3271). 3. )( Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. X Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8*j"xll" for ^ reproduction). 5. X Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes 7in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8%"xll"). ^ 6. A Slcetches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8%"xll ). 7. '” As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. _^Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variaBcc application is not coaplcte_if_the— information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of th^s application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the of his/her Icnowledge. Applicant's Signature L Date ONMERS SIGNATURE ^ r *-vThe owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and fur .her authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature _____________________________________ Date ----------------------------- propert Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning CosBaission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please malce arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building fi Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. tion tain nter ^'L nges May 27, 1994 ease bove City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 RE: 537 PARK lANE, LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA 55356 Pianmng and Zoning Commission Staff: in regards to the above named property, we request the set back on the street side be 15 feet or 20 feet on the overage. We also request the hardcover calculation include the land between our lot and the street. We respect the intent of the city regulations as adopted. The lot at 537 Park Lane is unique in the fact there is property on the East side that enhances the intent of the regulation. The run off of the house, where it has been placed, would flow East away from the lake. The cliff regulation made us compromise the structure we hoped to build. The plan as it is. should enhance the community, but still not compromise the beauty from the lake or the hard cover, as it calculated. We ask for your understanding in this matter. Sincerely, re an snlng Karen and Doug Olson RUN OATf 05/2A/H <;Q\HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0»t«RS LIST REPORT NO. PIASSAOl PAGE 1MTCN 001PROP AOOR OWER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR Sa 0A-117-2S A1 OOAO00S25 PARK LA0 C REUCLER A S R BEUCLERORIS KUCLER/'SANORA BEUCLER525 PARR LALONB lake MN 5535A OOASSB 0A-117-2S A1 005AS PARK LA TERRY R JOHNSON TERRY R JOHNSON 5A3 PARK LA LONG LAKE MN SSSSA SB 0A-117-2S A1 OOAA 0055Y PARK LA J A MULVANNY ETAL J A MULVANNY 55<> PARK LANE LONG LAKE m 55S5A ADM Oh§mn HAHE TAKPAYiA MAHi/AOOA U 04-117-2S 41 0D4S 00S47 DARK U AUDREY OVERBY AUDREY OVERBY 547 DARK LAI« LONG UKE m S5S54 SB 04-117-25 41 0040 04100 ELH ST LUCY L GUUICKSON LUCY GULLICKSON 4100 ELH ST LONG LAKE HN 55554 SB 04-117-25 41 0041 0005B ADDRESS UNASSlGNlD ED BOSMA ED BOSHA 550 DARK LA LONG LAKE MM 55554 CO PROP AOOR OMCR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SB oi-117-2S 41 0044 0005B AOORESS UNASSIGNEO MICHAEL P SMITH MICNAEL P SMITH 5441 BARTLETT BLVO MOUNO MN 55S44 SB 04-117-2S 41 0043 00507 PARK LA ERNIN 0 SMITH ET AL E D A M 0 SMITH 507 PARK LANE LONG LAKE MN 55354 5B 04-117-25 41 0044 04111 OAK ST 0 t 0 SIEGEL OAVID H SIEGEL 4111 OAK ST LONG LAKE m 55354 f'a ^ ? DROD ADDR OHNER NAHS TAXDAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 04-117-25 41 0095 04105 OAK ST H J ALBERS A H R GZLDOH N J ALBERS t H R GILDQH 4105 OAK ST LONG LAKE HN 55554 SB 04-117-25 41 0099 00550 DARK LA E I E BOSHA ED BOSHA 550 DARK LA LONG LAKE HN 55S54 SB 04-117-25 41 0102 00557 DARK LA DAK OLSON DOUGLAS A KAREN OLSON 557 DARK LA LONG LAKE HN 55554 DROD ADDR ONNER HAHE TAXDAYER NAHE/ADDR tOtAL BAtcH OOl 00012 4 mm DATt 05/24/f4MTCN Ml • I« . • 4.* > * * * I NCM«PIN county WWPmTY INPORHATION SYSTEM PWPERTV 0»MCRS LIST KCPORT NO. PI4SS401 PACt 2 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEMTEO ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RE PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS TMS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPCRTVTAXAT^ON, Tp WE DEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND RELIEF. D' m «i •• • DATE '’'""4'M.J«s!,'„? «Q I 5 • g i g ! 30 TToTiS r HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE c ^e) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 5G0-1QQ0' . A.HntiSt X IOC&S.F. •LENGTH width X a S.F. ' 7'X S.F. • />X />S.F. X S.F.CO B. < r 1 C a PAG?■X /o <a 'P S.F. rip f VPWAY ^ CP <=>7r::D X 360 S.F. 1 XL . . ... V»t J X S.F. n *^ T nPWAL< $ / ''X /7-^S.F. ■ w* •• • U t ' X r S.F. X ;o/ O' '!a S.F. E. .. ’atio /D eck X S.F. F.Landscape ..X »•' ,r -f-S.F.^'^/'^ AREAS UNDERLAIN BY PLASTIC SHEETING I T If;. :S.F. I '.c ‘-Cv-r/I 'f- S ,F. _ S.F. G. Other Total H ardcover in Zone Total Property A rea in Zone ^ SP57 a[T1 //X 100 /Q^ ::: -2 5 > T 3.S.F. > 1 • • • fj m N/ ■J ^Unxiij^ '/ O-y^' 7^'‘x.o/.7.~ = ''■^'9 75'-^5o //O jy /^e^ \ S(oX^S /O V I * / *v -» /^i/6v c?3^o >/ ■.I U'.-! /-yh S4- '•' ] U */ - J' •vr 4^/ % ^ 4 ^8 ;<7€ - ly X ^ '=“ %/j:; tj /«2 -7^ 7^7 b''- ' J 1 ‘t‘SL <p<l'^'J, 3 %/79S>£oo , 4 7o7 1. Z 70 g^u .... / C -V ‘ -*7 jS? /- cT' /CP f /O . I 'nf%HMia ------_ CO R O'i i * 1 •i 1 1 Sx- A •s' N3 ' -f)•.i.' f I; ^ -a 'W%'S‘i'ii ’-'Xi-1 «l « *■ 996 -------------------- — ------------- 9^6 — J;_________ r ^C6- To:Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembcrs Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator June 13, 1994 H\92)9 Timothy W. Otten, 425 Tumham Road - Variance • Public Hearing jpertinent Ordinances 1. 2. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) - Location of accessory structures on property. The detached strucmre will be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building. Applicant proposes a 26 ’ x 38’ detached garage to be placed entirely in fu'ia of the principal structure requiring variance approval. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (E) - Accessory structures in excess of 750 s.f. but not exceeding 1,000 s.f. shall be located at least 15’ from any lot line. Required = 15’ (side lot line) Proposed = 15’ (side lot line) No variance required. Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IA setback standards. Required = 100’ Proposed = 108’ No variance required. The property is not located within a shoreland area and is not subject to hardcover controls. Lot coverage is not an issue as lot exceeds 1.99 acres at 3.8 acres. List of Exhibits Application Property Owners’ List Plat Map Elevation - South Topographic Septic Map Survey Zoning File #1939 June 13, 1994 Page 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes the installation of a detached garage at 26’ x 38 ’ to be located in the street yard in front of the front line of the priiKipal structure. The accessoiy garage at 988 s.f. in area will meet all other required setbacks. Upon your site inspection, note the placement of detached structures along Tumham Road and Chippewa Lane. Several detached structures are located within the street yards of the developed properties. Review Exhibit D, the exterior garage will be of the same design of the existing principal structure and will not exceed the height of the principal strucmre. There is no residence to the immediate north of this property, the property receiving the most impact from the structure. Review of Hardships Please review Exhibit A, applicant notes the following: 1, Location of new well to the immediate north of the existing residence. 2. The lot does not meet the required lot width of 300 ’ existing at 211’. 3. Sloping topography to rear or west of residence. 4. Manire plantings to west or rear of property. 5.Garage shall be placed in order to save majority of plantings in the northeast yard. Two large evergreen trees will be removed but the remaining mature plantings will be saved. Issues for Consideration 1. Are the hardships acceptable? East/street elevations of structure have not been shown. Are there design features that should be considered — what of landscaping along east side of garage? 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission members. r (I Jr i^ ^CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ^ ^ Initial Application Fee $200.00 ' ) -•- J ($50.00 per each additional variance) C'^ ^ (TTv nr r.-.'^nww —- , — _ - - - wa t t o w»Iwilw.* (no chsugc from originil application) /• 2NnNCE liE^nu LL\JLXX W**^**— -rr--------- ' Variance for non-conforming stnicrurcs $200.00 After-ihe-Fact Fees (Double application fee) 1 7srA•:.,\n^^A A W WV* PROPERTY INFORMATION ^ ^ t ^ _____if n.ir inrhided on reauiTcd sur\’cy. rcii *v'.n *.)OUlt i-wV«V'V' {‘u^rv tI teWavV » wvw* err 7 !*j T. TL‘A ♦.*»I I I-'rn^A ^ Vf I-f *. •'"r>f* f Zt'i* "5 • * fy^V'^ww'V WWA nv'A \sr , -VT/O i'w*' I / / - Prooerty lacnuiicauun inuiuu^i / , n ~ i u—-----r-*----------- Attach legal description to application if not included on requned suney. Date Property Acquired V/4j o ! 4l -----^— ------------ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels ot land. Present use of property: U^restdential -----other (specify). Zoning District: A \ P l (month/year) ^rrchJ - AdHrf.<s; A4;a City. ^------Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _____________________ Phone(home) Phone (work)_ Address:Citv:Zip: \ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST __ .. ______^ :___-Describe request in detail: /hu.^utJl, ^ y / JIL Estimated Construction Cost $ /X. Qc7C\ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage ♦ Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore r. z/T '‘ft r< - t. ^ i r (attach addiuonal sheets Jf necc^ai^ r REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All .h, fnllnwiny infnm,.rion must o.hn,in,d bv the application deadUagdajejaordg for vour appHration to he considered completei 1. 2. 3. 4. ^^eSficd 01 owners within 150 ’ (you must obtain this list from Heimepin Countv Department of Finance, A*603. Govt Center, 348-.'271). calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8/i reproduction. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/a x 11 ). 1/ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons w-ith an interest m e property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list ot any other persons you wish notified of this application. ___Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your v .Hnnre aDpHc^tmn not complete if the aboTeinfgnnntion has not been include berl^v teC^edges and agrees to this application and further authorizes entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Comimssioa members, and Council member.^ for purposes of investigarioh and ven^^auw^f this request. o™... this change prior to the meeting. 8 k om os/2«/4^BATCH 007PROH AOOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADORPROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER HAME/ADOR RROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR MENNEPIH COUilTY PROPERTY IhTC^MATiON SiSTEW PROPERTY QHNERS LISTSi, Sl-ilB-25 IS OOOE 00420 TURNHAM RO L E BERG 4 K H 0ER6 LEONARD A KATHLEEN h BERG 420 TURNH4n RO NAPLE PLAIN HN S5S59SB Sl>lie-2S SI 0005 04550 NOLVERTON PL J L NARSTAO A J R HARSTAO ^ANES L HARSTAO 4550 NOLVERTON PL ORONO HN 55S49 TOTAL BATCH 067 00004 . V SB S1-US-2S 2X 0001 04490 NATERTOHN RO KENNETH TURNHAM ETAL KEM4ETH A KATHRYN TURNHAM 9990 NATERTOHN ROAO MAPLE PLAIN HN 5555958 S1-118-2S 51 0004 00S8S TURNHAM RO C E PHELPS A J C PHELPS CHARLES E/JENNIFER C PHELPS 565 TliRNHAH RO ORONO MN 55359 Report no, P1955901 PACE 2058 S1-118-2S 24 0005 00925 TlffiNHAH RO HILLIAM N STEMPEL ETAL TIMOTHY H A ANNA H OTTfH 925 TURNHAM RO maple PLAIN 5555958 51-118-25 42 000600580 TURNHAM RO 0 E A 0 F MERZ DOUGLAS E A OIANE f MER: 530 TURfRtAM RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55559 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REFRESErh^ED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFOKMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS t^BESiOBr, DATE^lyjl9^ BY / ^ •A.Ol O 5 * a 8 <9) 5 Cl/j Kj/-"___IfUli__ 9fPEWA 0 1 Jo. i ;q«i 1 1 , 11 T T.1 . 1 1111.11. 1i-1 \ 1 omcNioiY CKAWNIY CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TIM OTTEN IN THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 31-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA .1 ... litaf t 9# fT to. T-HFf*27‘E 877 44 mu I f 17530 ......-tUf..—«. 2J0Sf 3609f .* 0f to>. 20885 N0T 27‘W •U4J LEGAL DESCBIPTIOII Of PRCMISES SUWVEYCO: Tilt South four Acrti of tho E«st five eighths of the E«st half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 31. Township 118 North. Range 23 Vest of the Sth Principle Meridian. M^tri0 4m* o: denotes Iron aarlier Bearings shown are based upon an assuaed datua. This survey Intends to show the boudarles of the above described property, and the location of an existing house thereon. It does not purport to show any other laproveaents or encroachaents. > ■ \h BBAWNfV atvwM OAll KsaumoN a COFFIN & GRQNBERG. INC. t I i;,, r ^ Lffl.l '>tti /VlM'li'* l.im.u.uk Aumn * I I .iki*. M\ i.i: in 4Hi 1 hcfitn tnfjt Ihil Ihh umn- ws% pfrfwml h me cw undrf ay dind twprr* t niun. 4ftd iKil I am a duly rrinlrmJ Ci«d En|inm and Land Swmyo* under Ihr bwt d iKr Stale of Minneiou SCALI r«do* Mats CranbefiMinnetoUlicvaMNiunbev oan pouMa H-f4A 94 tr i 7 Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse. City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator June 14, 1994 #1940 Keith J. Spencei. 25 Orono Orchard Road North Permit/Variance - l^blic Hearing - Conditional Use Pertinent Ordinances water area within an existing Type 2 wetland creattng a wddhie pond. c mss Subdivision 10 - Flood fringe district conditional uses. All dredgim^ or ' e^rttl of “from any laltebeJ. pond, or wetland or from land ad.acen. thereto. 4. Section 10.55. Subdivision 11 (A & B) - Standards for lloodway and flood fringe conditional uses. List of Exhibits A - Application B - Property Owners ’ List C - Plat Map D - Shoreland Map E - Flood Plain F - Wetland Map G - Wetland Delineation Report 1987, 198'^, 1993 H - DNR Report I - MCWD Report j - Gustafson Report . Elevations - Cross-section - Length L - Elevation - Cross-section - Width M - Survey - Topo ■ Existing N - Survey - Topo - Proposed neof undrf mydiffclMipcf- ret «nd Ufi4 Sufvrytir undff SCAU 1 rt40' 1 DA1V 11 ----------------------- mm. 11 Zoning File #1940 June 14. 1995 Page Description of Request : Si ” topographic information. Exhibit N, does not locate the areas to receite till. Review Exhibits E and F. As already noted, the wetland is a wetland and is also involved with the Hood plain of the protected tributary- to the south and west. Long ^Le Creek Review Exhibit H. Ceil Strauss of the DNR advises that the wetland is not a DNR protected wetland and would not involve a permit from that Dep.irtntcnt. Tlie Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, I'le Local Governmental Unit for the City of Orono, has leceived Ihc^nn« application from the applicant and has conceptually approved the proposal subject to the City of Orono's approval. The Corps of Eneineers will only requite a permit if there is to be filling w iihin ihe Hood Plain or the wetland. It'is staffs understanding that the Corps will not require a permi for ihe Lcavations made within the flood plain. If the spoils from the excav.mon are to this property, they must be placed out of the flood plain and at least 25 from the defined edge of the wetland. Review Exhibit J. the engineer ’s report. Gustafson approves the design of the wildlife pond but has major concern wtth'the lack of infomiation on placement of spoils on 'he Pro^n^y. These areas must be located on an amended grading plan and the method for erosion control. Staff is also concerned with the method and type of equipment to be used in the excavation of the spoils from the center of the wetland How will equipment W™ach the center location and where will spoils be stored during the excavation process. The grading plan and the method/equipment to be used during the excavation . provided to the City for th, engineer ’s review and comment before the application can proceed to the Council for final action. In an earlier subdivision review involving ihis property, staff located a fumre septic area to the south of the existing residence, li is siiongly recommended that tte area " protected before the land alterations begin and that this area should noi be consideied for the receipt of fill. Ceil Strau.ss has recommended that the applicant contact the DNR wildlife section for technical assistance in the design of the wildlife pond. Applicant should ^ ^ conract the Hennepin County Conservation District at their Ridgedale ottice '^hich provid^ assistance in the design of wildlife ponds within the western suburbs of Hennepin Co y . jrvkwlng the elevatfons of the pond. Exhibits K and L. it would appear the applicant has already received some technical assistance. Zoning File #1940 June 14, 1995 Page 3 Options of Action Available to the Planning Commission To approve finding proposed land alterations will result in a higher quality wetland, that original wetland has been partially drained by a drainage ditch and the pond will provide habitat for^a variety of u ildlife. In addition, the proposed land alterations will be conducted subject to the necessary standards set forth in Section 10.55, Subdivision 11 (B) for all land alterations within the flood fringe. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Prior to the application being scheduled before Council, the applicant shall submit an amended grading and drainage plan locating areas to receive spoils from excavation. Plan should also include erosion control and method/equipment to be used during the excavation phase of project to be reviewed by the City Engineer. Spoils to be deposited on the upland areas must be considered clean till as detined in Section 10.02 of the Zoning Code. Future septic areas to south of existing residence should be staked before any land alterations commence on property. This area should not be considered for the receipt of spoils. Upon approval of the Council, applicant must obtain a land alteration permit from the City before land alterations can begin. 5. All areas receiving fill must be seeded as soon as the tinal grading is completed. OR Table application, pending receipt of amended grading plan and information on the method/equipment to be used during the excavation process. OR Denial, finding the proposal to be in complete conflict with the intent of the flood plain regulations of the City and the wetland/conservation policies of the City. Isv CITV' OF ORONO •general land use Mlicatojn -2 PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ___________— Type of Application to be FiledX J \Jk d ------------- ------------------------ Propern- Identification Number (P.I.D.) .APPLICANT ^«5 O'ia.cv^tsff.v* ^ 33 OtaOH Phone (borne) jyjame t-NevWs 3 . S*?^C-C«^. Phone (work) - <g\ >\ Address City Zip 0\^T^ER (if different than applicanO Name Phone (borne) Phone (work) Address Citv Zio \oDate Propeny Acquired ______^— . I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES • CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 50.00 For each variance request with CUP application 5125.00 Residential Accessorv' Use 5200.00 Instimtional (church, school, etc.) 5175.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments S 150.00 Duple.x Credit/Bldg 5250.00 Commercial/Industrial Use 5200.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75’ of lakeshore (monthity'ear) PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule SIOO.OO Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee r ri’y nC ;**t* /r ? WX I * Aiji'* '‘’irr*T**r I i#r>'MU4« -I » X u-fc. X CWVA. VV'V 01 QE:i 20i CHECK TL 2CC iitCEIPf-1 !{3047&0 cool 001 _■ OTHER APPLICATIONS . 5200.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant tees) ______$250.00 Vacation ______$175.00 Easement Vacation $ 75.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision 5300.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) S'iOO.OO Comprehensive Plan .Amendment ______$100.00 .Appeals ______Other - see Fee Schedule • PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY’ Present Zoning District______________ Present Use of Propeny Residential Other (specify) RUN OATI ns/iun UTCN 004fROR AOOR ONNIR NAHE TiO(RAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER HAME/AOOR PROP ADOR OMCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADQR PROP ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR 0»t«R NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR GNNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OHNERS LISTSa 0E-117-2S ZZ 0001 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO STATE OF HXNN STATE OF HINN (ONRI (LUCE LINE TRAIL I SO 02-117-25 22 0005 00245 ORONO ORCHARD RD S VILLAGE OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL DAY ffl 55125 50 35-110-25 55 0005 00105 ORONO ORCHARD RD N GAD RELLENBERGER GREG S RELLENBERGER 105 ORONO ORCHARD RD LONG LARE Ml 55554 50 55-110-25 55 0000 01545 ORONO OARS DR jmN A DALBEC JOHN DALBEC 1545 ORONO OARS DR LONG LARE HN 55554 50 55-110-25 55 0012 00050 ADDRESS PENDING CITY OF LONG LARE CITY OF tONt: tARE PO BOX L-1964 PARR AVE LONG LAKE HN S5554 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 2150 02-117-25 22 0002 00015 ORONO ORCHARD RD S JANES C FARLEY JAHES C FARLEY 15 ORONO ORCHARD RD SO NAYZATA HN 55591 50 02-117-25 22 0005 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CARGILL HAC HILLAN JR ETAL LONGRIDGE ASSOCIATES P 0 BOX 9500 DEPT 20 HPLS HN 55440 i . 38 02-117-25 22 0004 00045 SniTH AVC 6XL8ERT R THOHPSON ET AL GILBERT A ELAINE THOMPSON 45 SMITH AVE NAYZATA HN 55391 38 34-118-23 44 0003 OOlSS ORONO ORCHARD RO N EDMUND N r RYOELL EDMUND RYOELL 135 ORONO ORCHARD RD LONG LAKE HN 55554 « I*' 50 55-110-25 55 0004 00025 ORONO ORCHARD RO N K J A T B SPENCER KEITH J A THERESA B SPENCER 25 ORONO ORCHARD RD N LONG LAKE HN 55554 50 55-110-25 55 0007 01555 ORONO OAKS DR D H SHAN A H R SHAN DONALD H A HARLENE R SHAN 1555 ORONO OAKS DR LONG LAKE HN 55554 f V 50 55-110-25 55 0009 00020^ ORONO ORCHARD RD N CHEYENNE LAND COMPANY NOHELL F FREEHAN 20 ORONO ORCHARD RD HAYATA HN 55591 58 55-110-25 55 0010 00050 ORONO ORCHARO RO N J L HURPHY ASS SHITH JAKES HURPHY A SANDRA SHITH 10 ORONO ORCHARD RO N NAYZATA HN 55591 ‘7- 5B 55-118-25 55 0015 00058 ADDRESS PENDING CITY Or LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE PO BOX L 1944 PARK AVE LONG LAKE HN 55554 58 55-118-25 55 0020 00058 ADDRESS PENDING CITY OF LONG LAKE CITY OF LONG LAKE PO BOA L-1944 PARK AVE LONG LAKE HN 55554 TOTAL BATCH 004 00015 • I J t / ♦ t ' y; i*r. AV ‘« A**' s \ r 1 '•tai.Ifliv \,s/ LAKUKAIHIN/X » »/ /I K>*v \MLUINA X s^VULlit LLU h. ■, a 1 ^'■-'7 ■ H W>^' ^ • i‘ i ”.- M 0». V^/ *N I ^ I' LUCE LINE < C\A'-' £ I MlltmillSTAl :f;-) !•, I \ m0 ■'5iuni'3 •• IfllllM 0 •V, #i w 1 /"”\ \L "•■-'/ \ fAOurji).«. ■ ■ % I \Jj \L^f} t unowrir. day **f I I I MOniH AUM ^•^4'%>r Y IAKC MINNEIONKA \g;-; ____JtOAD c J City of Long I.ake AMEA NOI irjCl UDLl) \\ ll • ■ 1 T #• V*. ^ I I'I; : ; 1 -V'-N-V :i■ •!!• >1» ' • *s.i' i.\ i t* ^ " PFIii i» ■ ', •■ •■-4V '■*-.. ZONEj) w ■p \ t ) I // -7 // ZONE C ■xfl ft . •.••*wt.«ai *■ •> ri«t—I r ♦>Av^:s5iS ^ 'IBStr^iTW J* i-r " Lr-^r'*.;v-’'5^•">55$1 . *.rT'«.• v.j .5^ -^1 i-'3C. ■f'''' ■r^wr-i:ri35~ •, >-** .Useicicc''i V, ..• - ' •• j*-- ... G^ ‘-v-***’Si . •■ V *• **>. :'► ’■rri"f** li * — • -V ’<!•• : -*r .i- »• ' ?• V*f- m''m^mIS tp.r. f ;» .* ^* ‘U* ?r> •-r- ^ «*' # rV- T»f"^ . .'• r **•> ^. ■I'C( * ■-, t.•e.' ''■•tr • k , ?*%a^G-ql k- A m & ^-' « rCi k?Tr ;::«y>i'J l.»^,«w. *i?v ; . s' LVVi r-^ #sSs •■^ , « •#W 'I O'.''<j/ .Njft -. V'-'S (9 *• .•r 1 V ii r Wetland Delineation Report (as per 1987 Delineation Manual) for Wetlands Boundaries on Property in Long Lake, MN for Keith Spencer John C. Anderson WETLANDS DATA 7421 Franklin Avenue W, St. Louis Park, MN 55426 _ _Mrif 1 data form ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands DelInMtIon Manual) Project/Sile; SE 1/4. SE 1/4. »35. T118. R23 Applicanl'Owner; Keith Spencer Investigator. John C. Anderson - WETLANDS DAT^ Do Normal Orcumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse side.)______ Yes No Yes No Yes No Date: 5/5/93 County: Hennepin State: MN Community ID: _PEMCd Transect ID:________ Plot ID:____________ Wetland A VEGETATION Dominant Plant Spaces Stratum Indicator 1 .Phafans arundinacea Herb FACW+ 2. Soli dago aJtissima Herb FACU 2.Taraxcum officinale Hero FACU i.Corr.us stolonifera FACW 5. 6. 7. 8. Dominant Plant Species 9. Stratum u. Indicator 1 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC (excluding FAC): 50 Remarks: Above list describes dominant speoes aj the upland wetland boundary. Saiix exigua (OBL), Fraxinus pennsyVan/ca (FACW). Urtica dioica (FAC+) and Verbuscum thapsus (UPL) are less common at the wetland boundary. The wetland interior is dominated by Phalaris arundinacea (FAC^*). The adjacent upland is dominated by domesticated grasses, and residential lawn. HYDROLOGY r™Recorded DaU (Describe m Remarks): Slream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ___AenaJ Pho(ograons ^ Other No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators; Pnmary Irxjicators: X Inundated Saturated m Upper l2 irKhes Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns m WeUarxJs Field Observations: rWipm of Surface Water 6 (In.) Depth to Fr€?e Water in PI 12 (m.) Depth to Saturated Soil: 3 _ (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidaed Root Channels m Upper 12 inches Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Mapped as PEMCd by NW1. M.P*.% Applicant Name: Keith Spencer LocationiSE 1/4. SE 1/4. »35. T118. R23 DATA FORM 3 ^ ATYPICAL SrrUATIONS Application Number: Plot Number^ Project Name: Date:_J5/5i^3_ Wetland A A. VEGETATION 2. Effect on Vegetation: Unknown - now dominated by exotic species. 3. Previous Vegetation: (Attach documentation) Unknown 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation? Yes X .. No 1 B. SOILS 1. Type of Alteration: Partially drained. 2. Effect on Soils: Buried and excavated on drainage ditch. Rest unaltered. 3. Previous Soils: (Attach documentation) Marsh - see soils map I 4. Hydric Soils? Yes X No I C. HYDROLOGY 1. Type of Alteration: Partial drainage 2. Effect on Hydrology: Likely reduced periodicity at inundation. 3. Previous Hydrology: (Attach documentation) Unknown - assumed at least seasonally flooded. 4. Wetland Hydrology? Yes X No Characterized Bv: WETLANDS DATAJ6121 546n5964 B-4 ; tc,a.* •C' Wetland BAinea^ion RiSprfrt (as per 1989 Delineation Manual) for Wetlands Boundaries on Property in Long Lake, MN for Keith Spencer John C. Anderson WETLANDS DATA 7421 Franklin Avenue W. St. Louis Park, MN 55426 data form ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMIN N METbOO' / •» Field inwactigatfiffs): John C. Anderson - WSTLANDSDA^------^ Proiect/Site: ------------- State; MN Date: 5/5/93 County: Hennepin Plant Community #/Name:_P£MCi /StofeM"a^re*d^^ Se description is necessary, use the back of data torn or a fieW notebook Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes X No_____ (It no. explain on back) . ^ Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed. Yes_____No X (If yes. explain on back) Dominant Plant Soeoes 1. Phalans arvndinacea 2__________________ 3__________________ 4. _________________ 5______________- 6.__________________ 7._____________________ P.______________ 9__________________ 10. Indicator Status ^CW+ VEGETATION Stratum Dominant Plant Species Herb 11._______________ _______ 12_________________ _______ 13_______________ _______ 14 ---------------------------- _______ 15________________ ________ 16_________________ ________ 17-------------------------- ________ 18__________________ ________ 19.________________ 20-------------------------- Indicator Status Stratum 100Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACW. and/or FAC (FACW. Verbascum thaosus (UPL) and Urtics dio jca (FAC4-) are less pommon at the bgundajy.---------- SOILS Series/phase: Marsh Subgroup:.1 Is the soil on the hydnc soils list? Yes_ Is the soil a Histosol? Yes X No_ Is tlie soil: Mottled? Yes_____No__X Mathx Color; N2/Q_________________ Undetermined__ Histic epipedon present? Yes. ~Gleyed? Yes. X No____ No__X Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators;________ Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes_X Rationale: Glev ed and mapped as marsh soil- Is the ground surface inundated? Yes_X Is the soil saturated? Yes X No— HYDROLOGY No_____ Surface water depth:. Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:__________ Ust other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. Saturated to surface.______________________________ Is the wetland hydrology cntenon met? Yes X No Rationale: Inundated, saturated, mapped as PEMCd by NWI. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes_X____No_____ Rationale for junsdictional decision: All three parameters present.________________ ’ This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community Assessment Procedure. * Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy.* PT\ • *%i . * ^ ‘ ) KD3^^ C."^\ «. :r’‘ ' • .. t«A.4j o 'SL# The projecl involves crealion of an open waier wildlife pond in nan of an e,kilr„ drained Ty^ 2 jurisdiciioiial welland. The projecl is lolraced soulheast of Long nor heas. Of ,he intersec.ion of Orono Orchard Road and ,he Lnee l“!i HiSvad , OIK). The site is within Sub watershed Plannin** Unit U-10 I I P IQ Th#» i would crea.e approximately 20,000 square fee, of Id lier q aii.y we', L and Srf ■* r • ? i « • \ j WETLANDS DELINEATION DOCUMENTATION FOR KEITH SPENCER PROJECT IN LONG LAKE, MN INTRODUCTION John Anderson, Wetlands Data, St. Louis Park, MN, delineated and documented wetland boundaries on the subject property on May 5, 1993 at the request of Keith Spencer. This report provides information as to the dominant wetland characteristics at the site. Th.^ parameter of the wetland/upland boundaries are provided in aach delineation report form as this information is redundant l.vjre. Please review documentation of these findings (referenced in report and site plan). A plot of the staked wetland boundaries will be provided. LOCATION SE 1/4, SE 1/4, #35 T1189, R23 Hennepin County, Minnesota METHODOLOGY Wetland was identified and delineated using the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (Interagency Task Force on Wetland Delineation, 1989) and the 1987 corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1987). Revisions to the former method have been proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and are currently under review. Pending the adoption of these revisions, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is applying the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual. The wetland basin was classified according to the methodologies set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (FWS/OBS Publication 79/31; Cowardin et.al.l979) and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine 1971). CHARACTERISTICS OF WETLAND INVESTIGATED Checksite A This is a partially drained Type 2 (PEMCd) wetland occupied by Reed Canary Grass. It is mapped as Marsh soil and located in a depression. PHONENO (?^'s i @ ■irz3\ ^ ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 772-7910 Ml * X April 22, 1994 / •' fr ;1 • • .' • ‘ * 1 ._.S Mr. Keith Spencer Spencer Global Association 333 South 7th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 RE; POTENTIAL WILDLIFE POND PROJECT, CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Spencer: I have reviewed the site location maps you faxed on 4/21/94 for the wetland you were interested in modifying for a wildlife pond. The site is located in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 3, Township 117N, Range 23W (on the west side of Orono Orchard Road and just north of the Luce Line). This wetland is not under DNR permit jurisdiction, so no DNR permit would be required to alter this wetland. You are advised that permits or approvals may be required from: the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (Ellen Sones § 939-8320), the City of Orono (Mike Gaffron @ 473-7357) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Joe Yanta @ 290-5362). I suggested that you contact Jon Parker, DNR Wildlife Section, for technical assistance on appropriate design of a wildlife pond. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have questions. Sincerely,c o / Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist CCS/cs c: Jon Parker, DNR Wildlife Ellen Sones, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Joe Yanta, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mike Gaffron, City of Orono AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER MiNKEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka. Minnesota 55345-1597 oHice: (612)939-8320 fa*: (612)939-8244 DISTRICT ACMimSTRATOR: El’en B Sores BOARD OF MANAGERS: ■p'.cr-as Mar e Jr P-es *0 .VooCrcw Levs • Jofm E Thon-as C-af*sor Lm<iiey • Thonas W LaScuwv • Marra S ^ant'e* • Paneia G 5ii*l June 2, 1994 Permit Application Wo. 94-74t Applicant: Location: Purpose: Keith and Theresa Spencer 25 Orono Orchard Road North Long Lake, MN 55356 City of Orono, T118, R23, Section 35, SW 1/4 Wetland alteration involving excavation within existing wetland to create wildlife pond. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Spencer: At the regularly scheduled May 26, 1994 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed along with the following exhibits; 1. 2. 3. 4. Permit application 94-74 received May 5, 1994. Letter from DNR received May 5, 1994. Site plan received May 5, 1994. Wetland delineation report received May 5, 1994 Action was taken approving your permit application pending receipt and staff approval of the following exhibit; 1. Documentation of City of Orono approval. The following condition shall be placed on the permit: 1. The excavated soils shall be stabilized by seeding immediately after the project is completed. Please be advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been submitted, and you have been notified of permit issuance. Sincerely, Ellen B. Sones District Administrator EBS/cr c; Jeanne Mabusth, City of Orono receive^ JUN 6 1994 env OF ORONO if i Bonestroo AlJ Rosene ^35 Anderllk& ^1 Associates Engineers & Architects June 13, 1994 CaoO C * ic'vei. t<»-er: f *» C No¥*i •* ejcet 5 k.t4'' V •V#<^ C3T1^,J"* »tv»rc Pt Hftffy A. C0^%>0^- icot*^ t e^-jr nV •ci»' *1 ZM^C V wOI«Cf4 •€ C ••MC^ ^ ^ A •CUOCA. PI V# • A ^A^'ien PI. v<"er ■ tj*ir-^nr, P* C. •«c^e* • An^jf'wrs Aw A. CSAJ« C ivvet •« rfctnc j. •* '|.Tt#C* MjTVf Pf wree‘ p *’i A,g»»ei M rrr^ A. £ P PP»»'io^ P€ Vi^-lP c Pf t V^e"X *l 3 Pt-UK- •! kcr ^ A^f'^PA P» • pnd»“icn •! ^*J•t I AoA •£ Mere a k» *i Cry MCfA. p£ P#^ i 0««noA. AiA Dee*#. > f.^rton. Pf A 9\% •* •rv»9 / Mjr« O \K%MV ft. MIPS § ;p'’tpn. •£ r»»-^ C r^v Pfi (4i«n W 'JU‘y—^ f E Ci'v D. «'uoaa. pf * >jd Pont*. Pf MO • Pf Twv^t - le-C L Pf 3 Ziu%uhor\ FI CffAO CVff p£ PKii c *^f •€» Pi .j/*A • Ge«»» Pf A ^‘ctson tM M Kenri M Oso A .#<^1 P f •AP'Prat Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City o ’ Orono Post C rfice Box 66 Crystal Bav, Minnesota 55323 Re: Spencer Wildlife Fond File No. 139-1940 Dear Jeanne, W. have revewed the proposal ,o creare an op„ --j't«'frdirUo«r " Type 2 wetland. As the ‘‘he Local Government Unit alterations is w.th '>>'p.nnit to do the work pending ,LGU) or Orono. ’iJl^jSwildlife pond is acceptable from and eng[Menng°5tandpoint. However, we request the following information be provided prior to construction: -Method and/or equipment proposed to complete the excavation -Specific upland areas proposed for the material disposal -Erosion control methods proposed for disposal areas We want to make sure that the disposal operations do not impact the drainage on the property or adjacent wetland areas. Please conuct me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, bonestroo , ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. / 1# I f ^ j.an'W* iifiii iHiiiffliii •’•i t j ‘ *u 'It’M inuuiiiill jV..>,'' it.il i,^aipi mwm\.u^^'^'?>m -.m , zLJCLLOTb LJ 1 _________ Ci ^i-k />^ c. -s: , /t1 2i - -^ / 50 / CMRITTM^ - _CyL^y^ C.je^zL/^^_ ...... ^ (^>:c C Ca»D /^3wbk - >J07 “ POJ fSt-fT" tijd:. '.Citt-^rX>^ ~--------------- ■to '. r* tK ^A40*> - - —. . - ■ ■ -III I_________ .. - - ( y.. ^ r_. 'i ______.« ''7>P ,_Cr!in-?f--_^r -Sr- I'y ('^ " *'■ __y ’.T^.- i"/*-:*::-. T-'”' '_____________ f=^ (11^ A^Ac^f o ^ 35=F --------------------------yjoi^K. p.l^. k U^o* _____i* lUO'-{ rA^fSf ■ ii * ‘^' ~~ '^c'A'.'^t'*— ^ =^ I'Ch'i- GfAt^ClI^FW-'M r««*r**^'t?OC/'- /'J ^ i^/ O-^- /j 5>'l __ '‘^^"Y^FC~{~ ________________ I1B>9 ^\Z\o^ CAjvV2 y C C, - fo^'^ iaa^v, m _ 'S>pc/l /aJ I:>.tAJ. feXC p,i/^- t tj . . /Ak'tJ^i,y<c p. t-*- -tf^ l(;v^ ^ /JoT" * L t ^O • ^ ISz^ |50^ l?.o0 5- S^*-^ Cr^j^']ovi f.c-r\.'^. fe-lC>©^ '/li(M66i)U ' eye .Pow5i ■'■' Cs» it c^ijFy~ *:jTvr?c-\J' ________ ( /fj^ ___^ I 2. [ (^____(y^ ’J±^ -' ■ ■ -- ------------ -------- ------- Z, I ,.J ^4^ - / ■yi^p ^ ^ ^t—___________________ ______1- , ^ ---------------- /^ofMsuc._e _jj ^ ( f n / ) ■ ? ^ ^ ~ X C . •'' -T.^----<tG----? {>■■ l(g -<.«jd«.V£uf ‘"T• # I ‘ / ...^Uu • ' ✓^ /'V ■yr. ^{_ *)•'; f-'V.f par-'b* — k^jTt r^y^ tjl »/ K oC /oi£> ^ } on ^ V,' * -’ir,-•—- ---------- , / Of>'^ '* J? /VX»«G,SoP''TT * '■/'/^^ - ^ >• ^ /r^ ^ (0»X ^ / CO 9.< y -. -,. ynMcti,' Ld'u-“.-. r-tl-._/-— 1 *-V ri r 4 yn 5!T n >«-- C'ou/ju' iJ=> p- ' ,.. :__ - -• ■' ■ w>^'2_ O 5^ •■'^•^’=‘ L* ^-•‘■^ * — ........... ■P(Cf - ^/^v'^:p.f^uT^e■r• . Z' -- ' 4i'y'J^'H'.=^-'’^-!''JJ.^ Z''^‘ I _W|*yd^'-’" ■ m-‘> it <tn klA^rv.^- r*>' ^ ^r^*Ci(.- - No-r ■ qo3 rr^ r-6 - ^rtA ----- ---------------*r lA6»ef^ .......' ' ^wirirr AS haVI*^" ' ;4fi,T2 .. f4u^ it>-7L^_ (Ctc>.<A-nt<e. - -----------" -J 7-£ ^ t . ! f- r T ■^i^—hri: ^ 10 irvo r lAw ^ -1- - /o t r t.4£. rt-n«.^t<c v.'-":- w .....................................-- ■ --------------------or~ L/'-j 1?^ t;-4 /vi/rj.v.-6 ' I #- » /V-^ 7>.0* ^ po/o- , ^ ;r.vt iwi -^ fU. . i/o,:tf^i • '"' is5=u. -"^"32 ,. . ^f.ij-Ic'O - ^JZt€_C ■ P” , ''r , ,V’ ^—Wtct-'^ y- >;a^---------y^'K C^w'i^S-- 'f^-d ^l • /^'~’~<>^’ _ p,t<- VwO-7s' ru ^Ijco-pr:^ —jTi^t---------!i:,c": M^ i'i '■l^iv-pTr^ (. L'r- ^ -^10^ Al/CUvj^^“ ■" '■ V^ f f) ( _ Lr>/*^3^'-> __________________________rrSi I .. ---------- village of Orono Application for Variance from Wetlands Ordinance Directions to Applicant: a. Prepare four copies of this form by typing or printing in ink. If the spaces provided are insufficient, use additional sheets, keying information to the proper item number. b. Attach all supplementary material by paper clip. c. File four copies with Village Clerk. 1. Name of Owner:(Last)(First)(Middle) r '2. Address of Owner:Phone 3. Street address of property involved or, if none exists, description of location. 4. Legal description of property involved. r M •• 8. Describe the construction techniques and equipment to be used in proposed development. !■ 9. Expected starting date for proposed development. 10. Describe the extraordinary circumstances and how the public interest will be furthered if the permit is granted. -3- 1 11.Comment specifically on whether the proposed development will result in any of the conditions listed in Section 31.830(b) of Ordinance 125 and state what steps applicant will take to alleviate such results. -4- 12 . 15. ; The following material must be attached to each copy of this application; Surveys of affected property with elevations. 13. Site plans. 14. Other information requested by Village Council. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the Village of Orono to take the action herein requested, that ail statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the ordinances of the Village of Orono and the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Signature For official Comments Only: -5- 6. o o V •CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices "'o- < Street Mdress: 2750 Ketley Parkiftay Orono WN 55356 Mailing Address: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay. VN 55323 0066 June 13. 1994 To all affected property owners notified for the review ot Application#1941. IxrRoy and Wanda Fischbach. 3135 North Shore Drive: Please be advised that the public hearins originally scheduled tor the June 20th meeting to review the above referenced application will be postponed. All property owners will receive written notification when the application is rescheduled l->efore the Planning Commission at an upcoming meeting. Sincerely, /t :u ^ fl] Jeanne A. Mabusth Buildine & Zoninc Administrator JAM/lsv Tdiphone (612) 473-7357 • F.^.X 473-0510 i . To:Chairman Schrt>eder and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator From: Date: Subject: Michael P. Gaffron. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator June 13. 1994 Proposed Amendments to Section 10.56 Shoreland Management Ust of Exhibits A - B - C - D • E - F - G - II - I - J - K - L - Draft Ordinance Amendment MPG Letter to DNR 5/29 92 (Flexibility) DNR Shoreland Ordinance Approval 5/25/93 Staff Memo 6/21/93 (Approval Conditions) MPG Letter to DNR 1/13/94 (Tributaries) MPG Letter to DNR 3/23/94 (French Lake) DNR French Lake Reclassification Approval 5/6/94 Official Shoreland District Map Proposed Otticial Shoreland District Map Detail Shoreland Boundary - French Lake Public Hearing Notice Section 10.56, Shoreland Management as Adopted 2/24/9- Summary The purpose of this amendment is to revise Section 10.56 per the "conditions of approval- placed on our ordinance when it was approved by DNR in 1993^ '' correct a chanee to the "steep slope" percentage which the City agreed to m 1992 bu omitted from the code as adopted. Finally, the amendment will reclassify French Uke Nonh Basin and Sesvage Ugoon as wetland basins rather than lake basins, therefore these two bastns will no longer l^ subject to lake setback requirements. Review of Proposed Amendments (Please refer to Exhibit A) Section 1 This is merelv an update to the State Statute reference Statutes were recently recoditicd. Certain chapters of the State Section 2 As part of the Starute revisions, this reference number also changes Proposed Amendments to Section 10.56 June 13, 1964 Pace 2 Section 3 .... I t A rwji? th'\t ’^loDCS be delincU ns ihose n\crncinc The Ci.y ha-1 n- dcfini.ion of "dn buifdable IS-J or greater, consistent tcith ^tly s exu i bu„dabiliiv calculation (note that this land- which “;^-re-,n ,, section IS rarely “S^)- ‘ ^ c.aff could find no background information supporting ImTsianLt md CoLrsuLequent^^^^ agreed to revise our definition of "steep slopes" to 12% (see Exhibit C). Section 4 AS part of approval of our ordinance. HN pu " list of water-oriented acc^so^ 16 ,B n“l that the otdy water-oriented *:eTs^"s"alireV r^ roHW than the normal structure sethacit is a Urchhox. Section 5 two exhibits for background on this. Section 6 Staff review of the current Shoreland Ordinance concluded that lanpages=;r,r::rs adopted. Section 7 , ,f nNR\ formal approval of our ordinance in 1993, it was indicated that rsuhS^ittifM (Subdivision 16 (I) (1)1 should also be prohibited. Section 8 Thisis is another revised Statute reference resulting from their renumbering. ^___i Proposed Amendments to Section 10.56 June 13. 1994 Page 3 } Staff Recommendation Please review the e.xhibits if you have questions regarding any of the proposed amendments. Most of these are "housekeeping amendments". The reclassification of French Lake Nonh Basin and Sewage Lagoon will have an impact on the Shoreland District boundary' and will result in less strict development standards for properties abutting those two basins. Note that the North Basin and Sewage Lagoon will revert to wetland status and be subject to wetland protection regulations and setbacks (26’ for structures, 75’ for septic), rather than Natural Environment lake setbacks (150’ for structures anti septic). Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments to Section 10.56. Shoreland Management. Isv eXM. A ORDINANCE NO.SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CERTAIN PORTIONS OF MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.56. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT The City Council of Orono ordains as follows: 1. Section 1. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subd. 2 is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 2. Statutory Authorization. This Shoreland Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter iq3F. Minnesota Regulations, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900, and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. Section 2. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subd. 3, Definition 17, "Public Waters" is hereby amended as follows: 17. "Public Waters" - Any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 4-65.37,—Subdivi-oiono 14—and 15 103G.005. Subdivisions 15 and '> 6. Section 3. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subd. 3, Definition 26, "Steep Slope" is hereby amended as follows: 26. "Steep Slope" - Lands having average slopes of 4^ 12% or greater as measured over horizontal distances of 50' or more, that are not bluffs. Section 4. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subd. Definition 29, "Water-Oriented Accessory Structure Facility" is hereby amended as follows: 3, or 29. "Water-Oriented Accessory Structure or Facility" - A small, above ground building or other improvement, except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls, which, because of the relationship of its use to a surface water feature, reasonably needs to be located closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, lock boxes, and detached decks. Section 5. Miniicipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subd. 7, is hereby deleted and the following language inserted in its place: Subd. 7. Classification of Public Waters. The public waters of the City of Orono have been classified belo^; consistent with the criteria found in Minnesota Reguiiations, Part 6120.3300, and the Protected Waters Inventory Map fci Hennepin County, Minnesota: Protected Waters • D. #Natural Environment (NE)_.Lakes CHWI^Inventory Lake Classen 974.5'162-P Dickey Lake 985.5'161-W French Lake (South Basin Only)930.0'140-P Lydiard Lake 970.9'159-P Lake Katrina —154-P Wolsfeld Lake (Medina)—157-P B Recreational Development (RD) Lakes Long Lake Mooney Lake Tanager Lake Hadley Lake (Plymouth) OHWL 944.3' 988.0' 929.4' 961.4' Protected Waters Inventory I.D. 4 160- P 134-P 141-P 109-P C. General Development (GD^ Lakes OHWL Protected Waters Inventory I.D._# Forest Lake Lake Minnetonka D. Tributary Streams FROM 929.4' 929.4' 139- 133- TO: P P TRIBUTARY NAME SEC.TWP R SEC.TWP R 1. Long Lake Creek 35 (Basin 160P) 118 23 10(Basin 141P) 117 23 2. "Wolsfeld" Creek 27(City Limit) 118 23 26(Basin 160P) 118 23 3. Tributary to Wolsfeld Creek from Holy Name Lake 26(City Limit) 118 23 27 118 23 4. Dickeys Lake Creek 27 (Basin leiP) 118 23 34 (Basin 160P) 118 23 5. Stubbs Bay Creek 32(Basin 162?) 118 23 5(Basin 133P) 117 23 6. Painter's Creek 30(Basin 154P) 118 23 31(City Limit) 118 23 Section 6. Municipal Zoning Cods Section 10.56, Subd . 9,is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 9. Adoption of Official Map and Interpretation of District Boundaries. The official map of the Shoreland Overlay District is hereby adopted. A copy of said map shall be kept on file at all times with the City Clerk. In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this Section shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the City and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by State Statutes. The boundaries of the Shoreland Overlay District shall be determined by scaling distances on the official map. Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the district as shown on the official map, the City Engineer shall make necessary interpretation based on the Ordinary High Water Level. The person contesting the location of the district boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present his case to the City and to submit technical evidence if he so desires. L i Section 7. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (I) is hereby amended as follows: I. Vegetation Alterations. 1. No live tree witnin 75 feet of the shoreline or within the bluff impact zone with a diameter of 6 inches or more (or 19 inches in circumference or greater) measured 3 feet above the ground may be removed without first obtaining a permit from the City staff provided that at least the equivalent number of replacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable* to the staff are planted at the same setback from the shoreline as those removed. Appeals of staff determinations as to type, size and quality of the trees to be replaced will be to the Council. Removal of trees that are dead shall not require a permit but such trees must be inspected by City staff prior to their removal. 2. Intensive vegetation clearing within 75' of the shoreline aftd on steer slopes or within the bluff impact zone within the Shoreland Overlay District is prohibited. Limited clearing of shrubs and trees less than 6 inches in diameter and cutting, pruning and trimming of ^j^0gs of any size is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to acc.:mmodate the placement of permitted stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and oermitted lockboxes, provided that the screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced. Section 8. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (J) (5) (i) is hereby amended as follows: i. Any alterations below the Ordinary High Water Level of public waters must first be authorized by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources under Minnesota Statutes, Section 10 9.4'2 103G. 245; Section 9. Adoption and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect and shall be enforced from and after the date of its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this _ _ _ day of_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. 1994 by a vote of _ _ ayes and _ _ _ nays. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr.,.Mayor '<4 • // ii CITY of ORONO MlifliCipiil Offices Port Office Box 66 Crystal B«v. Miimesota 55323-0066 May 29r 1992 Ms. Ceil Strauss, Area Hydrologist Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Metro Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 Re: Shoreland Management Ordinance - Flexibility Request Dear Ms. Strauss: Thank you for letter of April 7, 1992 regarding fo? request. Specifically, you asked for explanation or ^ustificat flexibility in two areas: 1. Steep slope definition. 2. Lock boxes in bluff and shore impact zones. fiep=e^^L^f7nrt\^^n- ^e^vieror^; ^u%"^if!^a%-7:o “p-oW- Ve\^h\e^s o^- ;-:!a^;ions^^eV^l^r/"tLt^\\;e?e^n-e :?e^p- revising our ordinance to meet your 12% standard will have little any negative impact in developing our shoreland areas. Therefore, we would agree to revise the steep slope definition percentage to 12%. Regarding lock boxes in bluff and shore impact zones, ^°“v"box coLents are provided as justification for requiring no lock box setback from the OHWL: A. At a maximum heiqht of 4' and maximum lock boxes will have only a minimal visual impact as from the lake. IILEPHOSE - 473-7357 • F.\X - 4734>510 a if tion wing box 5 • f • r .ewed Ms. Ceil Strauss May 29, 1992 Page 2 a lock box at the shoreline was developed^specifically for properties with f , if U liftle or no terrace area inland of theE‘‘ HHSs would often require excavation into the ^ ^ determined there would be less impact on the shorelands by not requiring a setback. C. Orono has specifically adopted more restrictive s®tbacks for General Develooment lakes than required by the DNR and has totally prohibited new "water oriented accessory structures other than lock boxes within the shore setback zone. In effect, on each lakeshore property this eliminated the potential for a 250 s.f., 10' high structure located 10 back from the shoreline and 5 ^ than half the height and less than 1/ 0 the footprint are , but located at the shoreline. a visual impact standpoint, the lock box is much less of an aesthetically, minimizes detrimental grading the shoreland banks, and limits the near shore hard surface area. Based on the above factors, the City of flexibility for lock boxes as a low impact water oriented accessory sir^cture ^hile concurrently prohibiting much larger w^ oriented accessory structures with a significantly higher visual environmental impact on the lake. Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have further questions regarding our request for flexibility. Sincerely, Michael P. Ga.f^^on Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/ch cc:Ed Pick Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm. Ron Moorse, City Administrator City Council t/*-. 'w- ling Ml ^fplfmENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES^DfcKAKimci ^ 55155-4032 Raters , soo lafayette kuau , FitENo PHONENO. (612) 296-4800 May 25, 1993 The Honorable Edward Callahan Mayor, City of Orono 2545 North Shore Dr., Box Crystal Bay, 55323 Dear Mayor Callahan: r,r r-vruTT TTV RFOUEST AND CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF approval of ORONO'S FLEXIBILITY REQUtSi anu SHORELAND MANAGEMENT CONTROLS Thank you for submittiay^your^conmujr^x^^^ *^your ^ city ' s shoreland from the statewide sjjore previously adopted on February management cont..ol * Matural Resources (DNR) review. I2,;, 1992 for Depart»ont :“^itfon:rappro^arori;;e^sho?elandcon^^^ ■I Mai-i-h 1992 included city staff ;^°^;Lln^d\"wK^fcT;e,u^esVe^ ffe.fbiUt/fro. statewide standards in the following areas: 1. reduction of the structure setbacks fro. right-of-way lines (primarily from streets and roads), \\ eUmtnation o?\h%“se“back requirement for lock bokos of limited size, and rpauirement based ^ • rn\^n^c\\-ed'di\'i^an«'=s^7rr water level of the protected water body. The city's letters and attached materials adequately^d^^ ^rpt^vf^^q^^^rc ftyriquli't^for ^^feJ^TlTty. I also am informing you that the ® ^®"?Q,^trols°will fully conditionally approved at *"'f‘2o 2500 - 6120.3900 providedcomply with Minnesota Rules, Parts “^20.2500 bii p city's tha? the conditions Identified IdLessed and °^^rrprr«ed^"^t°o“'yVuTlanS u\^^ cSf dS?!ng the next ordinance amendment process. We remain available to assist of^'^the shoreland Srn??orr A?\eq “ufrtr?y^ t^ie" ordinance -tices of all hearings S;:^orfra^^d^\"e%J™sT^bt^runitre"d^iS\^^^Oe%^^^^^^^^^ These Should AM EOUAL CPPCRTUNITY EMPLOYER The Honorable Edward Callahan Conditional Approval of Orono's Shoreland Controls Page 2 be sent directly to Area Hydrologist Ceil Strauss at the following address; DNR - Division of Waters, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106. Funding may be available in the future for an administrative grants program for cost sharing the costs for implementing, administering, and enforcing the shoreland ordinance on a 50~50 basis. You will be contacted regarding your participation in this program when funding is available. I wish to congratulate you for the efforts the city council, planning commission, staff, and local citizens have taken towards ’protecting the water resources of Orcno and the State of Minnesota through the adoption of its land use controls which include the statewide shoreland management standards. Sincerely, DIVISION OF WATERS Ogbizghi slumkSupervisor Land Use Management Unit Enclosure c: Lloyd Knudson, Regional Hydrologist Ceil Strauss, Area Hydrologist Ed Fick, Shoreland Hydrologist Mike Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gene Strommen, LMCD Pam Albrecht, Division Accountant i i ^ ! ; TO SHORELAND MAl^AGEMENT REGULATIONS NEEDED W SHOR^^^ „enNEPIN COUNTY The following specific loVlia';.t°liTh "?;e shoreland nanagenent mainly itens of clarification or statewide standards. ^inc citv's current ordinance (adopted "housekeeping,” _„ired prior to state approval of the city’s February 24, 199 2) is not ^ However, these items must be shoreland the city amends the affected sections of theiraddressed the next time the ci y ordinance. X. The following sections need anendnent to reflect recent statute recodification: t-j -> 105" Should be "Chapter 103F" a. In Subd. ^ - (public Waters) - "105.37, Subdivisions 14 and "103G 005 Subdivisions 15 and 16" c. in sfbd 16, J, 5,'i - section •'105.42" should be "Section 103G.245" .. n Va - The water-oriented Accessory Structure definition Should be Inly^^^^ structure the city has ^^os:rtrafl^Tin^\he%^oreTnp^ac^'ione. 3. subd. 16, I - subitem 2 must amended to add b^u the areas where intensive I 1 to add "bluff impact ?iS^e"To Ue^1.Ta\'w°he?e" t^reei'with a diameter of 6 inches or larger is limited. — in addition, the city has chosen “'‘^3^';° cllTek)''*’o^ thl not on or only include a patti°" < ^ ity• s shoreland Protected Waters Inventory Map ^ watercoLses would bedistrict. The legal descriptions for these wate as follov/sz From Section Township Ranqe Section Township Ranqe Painters Creek 30 (basin 154P) 118 23 31 (city limit) 118 23 Stubbs Bay Creek 32 (basin 162P) 118 23 5 (basin 133P) 117 23 Dickey Lake Creek 27 (basin 161W) 118 23 34 (basin 160P) 118 23 Long Lake Creek 35 (basin 160P) 113 23 10 (basin 14 IP) 117 23 C JO ' s tute tion such has : are . the ‘land Ld be <- To:Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator June 21. 1993 Shoreland Ordinance - DNR Approval List of Exhibits A - DMR Letter Dated 5/25/93 With Attachment P.i.eenmen,hsarierour.op.Kmor^^^^^ a letter formally approving our ordi • conditional approval indicates mainly items and ■condi.iona," next time we do a genera. "dTaLlm^ -lew ihe.r list oi four conditional items: 1.These are merely stamte recodifications. We can certa.nlv add 'lockbox" to the definition of water-orienied ■‘ccesso^ reads: -04. Water-oriented :iccessor>' structure or factlity. A small abo«- eround building or other improvement, except stairways. ind retainin'^ walls which, because of the relationship ot its use to a Surface wa^r feamre, reasonably needs to be located closer to pubitc facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, tish houses, p P houses, and detached decks." We would merelv add 'lockboxes' to this list of examples. Council will remember that a different section of the Shoreland Ordinance *a "one ° [r^amples are allowed in the lakeshore setback rone other than the lockbox. In the -intensive vegetation clearing' section of our ordinance.^e »md th« such activity couldn ’t occur m the 0-75 zone or on steep slop s. clearing to include "bluff impact zone" as another area where intensive v g IL’t allowed. This seems reasonable. They also suggest we expand he 0 75^ zone to include bluff impact zone in regards to the prohibition larger trees, which also seems reasonable. yii ^ issued jquest items eneral essory walls" iniiion above­ docks, ;e to a public res and . pump :il will aone of ckbox. Memo June 21. 1993 Page 2 4 We merely need to add shon legal descriptions for the various basins an watemourses. which can be easily accomplished. r ■ - fnr innroval of our Ordinance appear relatively ^Se'ntirn. ^ X n^a. general aoning code revision. lal such /ants us :learing le 0-75 ’ ig 6" or ■A^ '.M January 13. 1994 Ms. Ceil Strauss MN DNR. Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul. Minnesota 55106 Re: Legal Descriptions of Tributaries Dear Ceil; r -I M.mre date the Citv of Orono will amend its Shoreland Ordinance to. al" “.i;:: ga, descr.p..ons of.he proceed cr.bucarces, inCudeng chose on che DNR's listing and those which Orono has chosen to add. Following are che legal descripcions as we would propose co incorporace .hem inco the ordinance: FROM; TRIRUTARV NAaME 1. Long Lake Creek 2. "Wolsfeld’ Creek 3. -Tributaiy to Wolsfeld Creek from Holy Name Lake 4. Dickeys Lake Creek 5. Stubbs Bay Creek 6. Painter ’s Creek SEC FROM; 1WP ;5(Basin 160P) ;7(Cicy Limit) !6(City Limit) 27 (Basin 161P) 32(Basin 162P) 30(Basin 154P) 118 118 118 118 118 118 R.SEC.,■nvp. 23 l0(Basin 141P) 117 23 23 26< Basin 160P) 118 23 23 27 118 23 23 34(Basin 160P) 118 23 23 5(Basin 133P) 117 23 23 31 (City Limit) 118 23 Telephone (612) 473-7357 • F.AK 473-0510 '4 S'- WwOLSFELD LYOIARO’ LAKE , t I >■» f4Q0 fiSy UAkS 1 v-i-------------—i.-r-^-;:^— —* r. > • ' > >• — .-^j-»i ,*«“-'V'"*, »».'■/ x-;,\ \ ^Oi.’V" i^Sfc. L. r^.-c 4^ ^./x *AXf-»0 f ...— .,----\ : ^€ST«flM *r^/ -./i nV I< . ' -X. » / X r “> * • '1 -xL^ / r'77-^1^: ■^-rr.-.\ /7\ -. T \ ‘.V :•■•'/ '"'■7-‘ -/yA ^M \ r—’Jr *>>rtTTC tif v\ . ; 1; X'.J ) / / . / \ \- '^'V.vV,) / fv. V / -vV% , •:.SK^ \ X Tributary Streams Painters Creek Stubbs Bay Creek Lung Lake Creek Woiafeld Creek Dickey LaKe Creek City of Orono, Minnesota SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT i:yy, :y \ DISTRICT BOUNDARY j.:.:;:;:;-:- j BASIN WETLAJMCS ,| INCLUDED FLCCDFUAINS norm k/arural Environment (NEl Lakes OHWL Lake Classen 274.5* Dickey LaKe 985.5* French LaKe Nonh Basin:930.5* Sev^age Lagoon:934.3* South Basin:230.0* Lydiard Lake 970.9* Liike Katrina •* Woisfeid LaKe (Medina)•• Recreational Develoornent (RD) Lakes ohv;l Long Lake 944.3* Mooney Lake 983.0* Tanacer LaKe 922.4* Hadley LaKe (Plymouth)961.4* General Deveiocment (GO) Lakes OHWL Forest LaKe 922.4* Lake Minnetonka 929.4* / / /Vf V o o\ i I 'll ii ^ I March 23. 1994 CITYof ORONO Municipal OfTices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parl<»ay Orono. MN 55355 Mailing Address. P 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay. VN 55323 0065 Ceil Strauss Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Metro Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 RE; French Lake .North Basin Dear Ms. Strauss: The DNR currently maps French Lake Marsh (27-140?) as three distinct basins, with three different OHWs: North Basin South Basin Former Sewage Lagoon 930.5’ 930.0’ 934.3’ As you know, prior to the Citj ’s shoreland ordinance review, the OHW for a number of lakes in Orono including French Lake, had not been determined. In order to define a contour line for measuring setbacks, the Cit> used a portion of its shoreland grant monies to provide survey work so the DNR could determine OHWs for these lakes. Although the City did not and does not contest the OHW elevation results, we do feel that the elevation differences of the three French Lake basins, as well a.s their physical characteristics, suggest that perhaps only the South Basin should be considered as a separate and distinct lake for shoreland regulation purposes, and that the North Basin and Sewage Lagoon should be considered as wetland basins. This distinction is significant in its impact on propenies surrounding the North Basin and Sewage Lagoon. Previously, these properties were only subject to wetland preservation and setback requirements. Those requirements included: • 26 ’ buffer outside perimeter of wetland, within which no filling, grading, construction, etc. is allowable. • 75* setback from perimeter of wetland to septic system. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Ceil Strauss March 23, 1994 Page 2 The change to a Natural Env. -onment lake c^- sif -ation for these two basins resulted in a more than five->old increase in structural setback requirement and doubling of the required sepuc system setback. However, the nature of these two basins is so unlike tlut ot the typical lake basin, that justification of the increased setbacks has been extremely diflicult. Following is a paragraph characterizing each of the three French Lt*Ke basins. Sewage Lagoon: NWl classification: PUBKGx Area: 16 acres approximately . „ Description: Rectangular basin 700 ’ x lOOO’. depth below outfall approximately 3-4’ but watershed may be too small to sustain significant open water depb; has never been dredged to remove sewage sediments; was constructeu ca. 1962, ceased operation ca. 1982; currently contains significant emergent wetland vegetation; is intended to be preserved by Citv as a nature/wildlife area with perimeter hiking trail. North Basin: NWl Classification: PSSl/EMC; PEMC Area: 82 acres approximately Description: No open water except in remnants of ditch system (pre- 195i . wetland types include Type 3 (east, southeast quadrants) Cattail ;h, and Type 6 Shrub Swamp (west halO containing nuny dead 6" - Itj mature trees which likely ^^ere affected by construction of sewage lagoon ca; 1962 (which may have somewhat raised the water table). Compare the 1955 and 1989 air photos enclosed. South (Main) Basin: NWl Classification: LIUBH; PEMlFd Area: 100 acres approximately (of which approximately 23 acres is open wQtcr) Description: Open water basin, depth unknown, surrounded by cattaU marsh (Types 3-5); floating bogs common; distinct natural channel outlerting to Crystal Bay, Lake Minnetonka. Ceil Strauss March 23, 1994 Page 3 A5 we have discussed the rationale for a single lake basin to incorporate three different OHW As we have d^us^a _ ^ elevations is [^rhaps tenuous Clearly, ^ “ n^lnStn histoty, as can a-sted by the 1955 and .989 air phonos « Please consider our » ",rba"vrafprt^^^^^^^^^^^ rh:“^r oXri t rn^". be adopcrater this year. Please cal, me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Sincerely, sMichael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning &■ Zoning Administrator MPG/lsv Enel cc: • 1" = 200’ Air Photos 1955, 1989 • City Maps 1850-60, 1879, 1892 • NWI Map : .mroee.oroe^eA^css IMAP Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator Ron Moorse, City Administrator r t •*•• Citjt f^tv 9t4*f If ff% »r« a. Ji» tf* 1. < *t c 4/\st*ms»^ f| »• O ¥#MI ^ ! lAf^ 1 *•’* ^4 istn* “7.. ii iiw—' J«4«4 C4«A#»« tss it JSl . M, ^ ^ Ji* r« • *• L U-4^ Jtfiimtsm #••• 'phi tt 'VI K^SSSff «• ^ ^ ^iH • Wittis*. 4T» ••• Pcj^t *^4 >4«*f L « aa /T^ « -1*^^Ps*r 0SJJ>*^ pu **'**^^ Jfs C tfK 0^4-9 tmi /* •% Cf J^tig% , b/ : :"‘N S^i*i fUmt fitm U.M., St* 0ttts Jsi^ Stitts’ 14 •* Ti ii%i^ JasSiit* ^UtUiSi t4*^ St ts4 4 ^•4ism t4$* A • #ir« Jii^ Cs4*"»*n t4** • * 49 M>&^ I- /•V *#• • j t.*y ti •» »n l—m JM # C $ift £■ c^. >• «« ^4 #•» < 4VI ^ >jr» ^ #• #*i«|A *% *t^ ^.if (?*«*• if M«f «* «t • • • ««• • •. ^rvj7<4 #i| ••;..............i**‘ ; //f rr * urns c t it ft* >•••••• ••• f««4# •t* tf ^t r »•« t • Si tm%iiuAL B t.«if i •» #•. • SI i Issf a..i..• ••••••••a •• J • w« TT /«•«/•< •4 ^4*. //•♦k i*l <1% < « St L*' ««*4 A n / - ui ♦ •• i Ot f ttfss U ts*c«#^ «/*4* Okmgs* .(P*n• ^*t4 fsfsms tUmsf ^ ...................... m^tm ^ *40 ^*v« *»* • • I** ’!■ _*4. r*«4j * ftiti* J»tf**rntm *J~UM---------------T' '*4»* /CjmfsT^i^ i*>w ma z > m Xnm t-' (f) O fgs&*ld<»0 Al /h 2 2CD ^ cr on C-n B- O Zi 03^ 5C o O 5 ^ OS’ cn n B ^ t: o s :::: < p COn m oo X c^ p-g o</) ■% r- f-4 tn P- ^Oo—a8S.- o or S p. rr ^ rr iy d It *■ f !%rwr// J f r V /y • •'f A M$$$$f % kr$ 09» i...............•/.////,#./. rA*// ' - % ^1.*' •-j .. :. <'.V ,rr. J!;^iV r<»■■■—•..■■ 4.-. ^ 'V./V-mA •r $l' /# .!>//#/,# . —• ? ‘ r u Iv:. -V*':'”• • •« • 3'‘-*f '• ' -iI « •». r»#/ ^ri_*.f A^**j •; A U'nr^<r^f^ ^ .mfj , ^^: i '*. ' - i: .. -? €: J ^ {» • XK—^ .•%- ?fi!.<<~i i .* « / * ' \ ' i . •" : "• ,1.# .... *JLT 5 . ;•• Kmm k W *4 4 •S ^ • f * I *1A.- /O ■ V. I A>«/ ^ A # A » firf0»$ I ) — — — _ .<»* «^ Y* V* M '«• At ^ A /. /•> V JL*S r«/ 0.-5-. , J. /•<*/•• } * ''V,■1 i'lA,../^ « I *1 .•> ti*i " ^ fC*t* »$••% i. - cf .*» ^Mrit \Xt^rti J 0, ‘'V-ur :v T 'ife >{« /a» / V ,-r-' » ^ .//A*• *«#/» 4/> y\ • //• ♦ nt, ^ //V J .•.ii**' , t'fti /Mi/ ( .y** u i>0 /•v>.l ^ . . r i. vt» .4KJ ttddr’ iA »r‘ ‘‘w*7W- if - . - V*' IX. •. ^.iv «'. i'-NC. :- ';v5^ -Si ^ Al« V Ql - m , Xf<C 09^ Jktm^ y/j# m ysHKitrhri i ef ••/ s V.* 'ErrvM»' 'A'i \« S(>' 4^ ofb: I A Un ^ o '# »•r> >•4 »>#//.• • e J a cmh r»'’s. ..*./ f’*r /jf w*•> • /. *04 0 ‘*tvj school 0/^r [N£ 6 I 'fa f fUf !• L«« w«wiU>i f»»# fc' K0*tJtJf MV rprtl.harj itt S9 1 ^ u r, 1* - f: ruk«/ t*^rz y§ m • V^C WKif*. it • T k*..* • ' r» vu W< «v^ *• t« mJ f 1 r SCHOOL . • •3 iJ, • •• » >• >5 ^•1: K H bm**** <v . . •r*'t- SCHOOL Dl T. luo 50 ••• I i./>tf i/ • * ^ VaV, ^ fw ]h »Vf • ^ i £ ^bllC 70 • • hi & Vv« C • ole ft 74 _ ■M [k F H 41 W • ' .« iH r .1 jurti *^ald e r »e H.l. i_ #1 ■■t.vX**; iixd.jti i'o/doL o'sr I • • /'■; y. ?r,. ^:*i1.Ejv ilKS;}‘J I SCHOpL i k % ZBmrkM kt • BmHtsE t . ; ii Tki Tafhot SST Nr‘94 JnJL fi Sn rU Kal W% on u "vi ^Msjy t :!.• H i-j 7>u/ |h l7ft</64*c .-I L_ U X.• f &4m itC 'fi^ f' S ^ 4a i I. • 7X^1^I / / / / / t^Pri ^r> / TOWMSHI/ *,, p ({hii,-'--'^' i m •7-^ -r^-.(.-'l :y/i-'^ <• : ♦' • '•'? C'ii t ;peMCd r PEMCd t . V V. * ^ * • WC ^fOe>&. •. • >cy4H7^ ..•iifl..vr^ ' •' I *^**.**"^^% ‘I P^ra. .--V : PEMC PEM^d pgicd •> •pefcAC ». : P6MF-^ ^,wa •' /s ^ *PU6G^ 7^ p^r '; ’ V '•• I ■"* * P£MC • I ’FFOiC ' I . (MKj^t 1 ( '\lvln 0> ** ^ • . • • ' i • ^ # i. . PTOlC f^Cd. ^... -.f Po^f^ Ss Pf^tC fFMC (y^ I !^r 'pEMee PEMF v PE mC^ . Q PEMt \_ ;>^V em C4 1^6Ha, PU6G . '^FEMC;: PEMr- - C^‘ '.poef. feMCd-:.^ •' P£MF .. z: PEMf P/C pfoicy V emc PEMC J^i .H )^ PEMC. _-------^ •' '. .^PEMCv^PEMIFd "P06G !'i; • • J PEMC ^ .: • > ^ ^ PEMC •-,Po6P L2U60 ;i\ Bohns UU6H 1 V n ! ^ \ ^66; A y. m- C5 / i\ Ut\ i M L. rx'N ■'• i JP\•-1 U r-^ V ' • • • • • A « # •• • -•K^. ‘ • / c:\ { v^.rr. :inv v*« • • • m •I ------- V'V* 1S*'.‘•'—r> . I • Y^, • • • o ')'V 1 \ •—tii«.. • ‘^ Jl 1!? • I • j*7 Vi ^^•• • • ■ • ^•• I • •• • '•^ • • • • •- - -------- ' . Ill • >•• •.y'—rT--- rv • i yv ’i*',!:! o ••• V. I’v G-re X J i\i-> j/ / -' Irs o • • 1 li tIII 4 ^A1 ;%^i ^ • -NrA j.-'^ Vs y :.f lO — y °ir' “V - 5 li*? " ‘ 9J4^_ 1!^ '\ H 94 s ^.V/vv>T^^vl; :•>: :-:xy; >:-:;-x*>M--v.-:--. .V.*.• •••»• .-.* .* •. Ct'iL. I {\i rr^. o .c:. TT. • f - .7^' ’\1Cr2r • N> C7.; ^1'^*1 r ^3. vS:■550- v 1 ;9's0'T?t^===^50; :^i:• • • li CX S=«5»V WT.^ 5^V> ■j-ry. ii «.■SjJ ’I• ^ n :4V \C^,^ ^ ^ ai ,1 s?\\ *\ -i ^ifeli'St'-''.v5 • »f1 m. V »■••* ► ‘.‘ • 1 n#w\»ti *<-* f #■ nk y 1 ___t^—1.7“^ cr 1A' i 1^1 •• ;• *7 j \ «l r4 i i5V 'O." -■ ^ r' 26.4 oc /OoR-TW BfiSl^ Mo- - ^ / ( /.A600Ni II I eniftjlr ")Hi‘ \J / Ma N ; /- 3 Ma -V / / ■‘}-.:r^ I4.Q0C V I ':'r^ C'^ (lf90)l Mo 93£>:Gr\^' ..‘.LAKE 0 ±. II » "• i (/} • -N W» • I ..'- i.*' •'• I • -T ^ / / / ‘■y' /; .V; W -j tl 4 STffiii■ibx _ (irof ^ ff .',*J 3 I ‘ /'r 1 ■\ // " — - * i U» « 1 f •• ! i \ V Y •!A •1 tJI V \-1 1 ’‘ r ! \• 1 i.-m •% 1 1 i i i \M' \,\\■s.^ •• « t >n>0 ( —~l M 1 • " fpV sin rrj U r, » p r / -Hilt,26.4 qc \ '^AtoRTirt BASf^i*' ’ V f'U.-c. / !'^ \0/ \ 'N /.A6^>o^) 1 I (fHOifr W.i' ' 7 \/ f -------------« V'"'n 1 Ma N /■ 3 J •' *■.' - ;i4.Qo^ rH I !• - \k9^ •«« 9‘ oHj>»'t-..a%S!i?> > © 7' /' x'.- \ f] St i* ' !^ t m*J V-—'-^•m (tumt Mo I . \ 7( 'mk' -iUi-Ki- Sjl T1?i J « •I Im VkMf« ►J - ‘V / l^€Tiwt.s (V\ap ■'■' ^ • E)C|STIf->6 R65\tk£rJC^/V(/I ./ 4/ 11'c? W^ -4ir VV 7T77;t>—-------------------------------f,n------5f— * \ > h \ (Mill I»* t • >1 y J \ I J 13.0 oc. iiX. '.^1 n%> / I 4 1 MHZ II oi tXLrnmm k m Main M UMr%l 3 I -IJ V e- TliSrirr: _dW STATE OF AS(n T OF NAJUR a IJESOURCES M^RO WATERS - 1200 WAK.<tK file no phoneno. 772-7910 Ml May 6, 1994 Mr. Mike Gaffron City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 RE: DESIGNATION OF FRENCH LAKE MARSH HENNEPIN COUI4TY (27-140P), CITY OF ORONO, Dear Mr. Gaffron: fho rit-v of Orono's request to redesignate the I have reviewed Lagoon” portions of French Lake ••North Basin and Forner nf March 23 1994. You note Marsh that you tre^°covered by one DNR Protected Waters that the three basins however, they have three orTn\%^y h^gh^ktere-J^v^r^ions^^nd lasin chLacteristics. .r.s ‘s; -s ratalsmeTas^'^wefland ba^sTn^"'sfbje\\ "to the City's wetland regulations we find the sLt?® shorerand^^mfnag\°men? Jegulttiins^Ld^therefore, find your proposed redesignation to be acceptable. oiF»A<-e note however, that we see this as a unique situation and t^NorL^Basin and Former Sewage Lagoon. North Basin and the Former Sewage Lagoon were oro^'ess ^French Lake Marsh) during the £ake in the late I970's and early 1980 °^^^^ura^Marsh d.e., the South Basin) was classified as Natural tnvi in the mid-1970's for shoreland management Water ihe North Basin and Former Sewage Lagoon are still Public Water Wetlands, but are not classified for shoreland management p P AN EQUAL OPPCRTUMTV EMPLOYER » ' Mike Gaffron *.<«nFrench Lake Marsh classification May 6, 1994 Page (2) t-he amended ordinance language, and the Please forward a • ^\.Qpted by the city. Please contact me effective date, after is P^ questions, at 772-7910 should you have furtner 4 Sincerely, C'. Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist CCS Ed Pick, Shoreland Hydrologist City of Orono Shoreland file yMm/ \K / V -____/ Q^hr^= 1 f' V'* 1:^ “L w^lirr >< ‘ > < 03 j : J r•^:>-^0NG ' ^r'^m L.^« ..K. I .-\^^^2::v.4,'-'i.li,/-o<^ , ■ < K/''^ '. j-'t^ljM\ ■ %. i. i:ii■ V'/ X’-^ %,ij ■ I • • »*'''rl _ •. ■ \ :-L._ '- V ii (0 >-: I t'-'» ' ' * f' \ J .^-•'«^i''• r"xy" ;v ^:J>c-'^ij Jl> W'^pm ‘*y.^‘/'y'CyAy//// '/ — '^■vjy) f '5?- ! ■ 1#.4V.S ^*Tcrs \ } WAYZAFA 'i’Y LAKE MINNETONKA iia<r«i ) TONK^, t • BAY A City of Orono, Minnesota SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT Jl north Hoed Key Natural Environment fNE) Lakes OHWL LaiXe Classen DicXcy Lake French Lake North Basin; Sewage Lagoon: South Basin: Lydiard Lake Lake Katrina Wolsfeld Lake (Medina) 974.5' 985.5' DISTRICT BOUNDARY 930.5' 934.3' 930.0' 970.9 BASIN WETLANDS '•^t •«*/: . ]INCLUDED FLOODPLAINS Recreational Develooraent (HD) La^es OH%T. Long Lake Mooney Lake Tanaqer Lake Hadley Lake (Pl>Tncuth) 944.3' 988.0' 929.4' 961.4' General Develonnent (GD) Lakes Frjrf*_SLr __Lajct* OH'^ 929.4' mi'---- —I— : |yV»'» >«»' l<< t SM LAKE KATRINA ' A ^ 0>-it^V*** MU)INA V nwolsfeld 1 LAKE I J ■ * “* i ' LUCE UNE >- lAv\ MMCTRSTaI mmw ■ >-T' ; " ' .. ¥iS '. TONK^^ BAY \ WAYZATA / V i/ -. City cf Orono, Minnesota SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT txtn «JOO Iwoo *>J "« aooon 3’<*»north Road Key Natural Environment (NEI Lakes OHi^ e« *s J Cl Lake Classen 974.5 q a ^ A • Dickey Lake French Lake 930.5’ o *1 J 7 *North Basin: Sewage Lagoon:n A A 1 Soutit Basin:930.0 970.9Lydiard Lake Lake Katrina Wolsfeld Lake (Medina) Recreational Develooraent tRD) LaKCS OHWL Long Lake 944.3* 9B8.0' Q*»9 4 •Mooney Lake Tanager Lake A r i a ISadley Lake (Plymc'-h)•7 0 I • 4 General Develonnent fGin La K e F 0!r«*i 9:9.4'rcrest Laxe Lake Minnetonka 929.4* Triburarv Strearns Painter* Creex Stubbs Bay Creeh Long Lake Creek Wolsfeld Creek /Dickey Lake Creek Wmm DISTRICT BOUNDARY BASIN WETLANDS r J INCLUDED FLOODPUINS in as,-:;.. —I—^ W LAKE KATRINA/ c -\\WOLSFELO —MEDINA. V LAKE 0 PCtCeNCEj ^----■ .. f,.il {„.,%.|..4<..U.Vu'.' "•^■!'«,I r''''^ BROWNS BAY I City of Orono, Minnesota SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT . 0 mm soqoa d'-* A. B Natural Environment (NE) Lakes pHWL Protected Waters Inventorv T n a Lake Classen 974.5'162-P Dickey Lake 985.5'161'W French Lake (South Basin Only)930.0'140- PLydiard Lake 970.9'159-P Lake Katrina ...154 - P Wolsfeld Lake (Medina)—157-p Prelected 'Waters Recreational Develonment (RD) I^kes OHWL InventorV I,D, Long Lake 944.3'160- P Mooney Lake 988.0'1 34 PTanager Lake 929.4'141 -P Hadley Lake (Pl^miouth)961.4'109-P Protected Waters General Development (GD) Lakes OHWL Inventory I.D.ff Forest Lake 929.4'139-P Lake Minnetonka 929.4'133-P Tributary Streams FROM.T-O: TRIBUTARY NAME ;SEC.TWp £SEC, TWP R I. Long Lake Creek 35(Basin 118 23 10(Basin 117 ■U 2 3 160P)141P) 2. “Wolsfeld" Creek 27(City 118 23 26(Basin 118 23 Limit)160P) 3. Tributary to 26(City 118 23 27 118 23Wolsfeld Creek from Limit) Holy Name Lake 4. Dickeys Lake Creek 27 (Basin 118 23 34(Basin 118 23 161P)160P) S. Stubbs Bay Creek 32(Basin 118 23 5'Dasi.' 117 23 162P)133P) 6. Painter's Creek 30(Basin 118 23 31 (City 118 23 154P)Limit) vmm\ DISTRICT BOUNDARY ] BASIN WETLANDS I ' ■“•^■■■<■■1 INCLUDED FLOODPLAINS H M J?-----rn lit »• \ / STUrtT ROAD V r* • Atl •%A • 1 11 ----------«u !U**t i«1 M /ww, 6 > w f ('T / L \j H" \ \ •N Tr. \ I I V / \ 4A660(0 c\:(\ t ! a JU (rnj^rLi Md C?!'- * / Sot( * t^iu; Otmf. •r iTT-. tntp I _ i« J »*.tt O tt ::i a 1*rs, tt i -Jt :•i M. i Si , ji<Tv< in*M .‘jiH -■ 21 U«" 1 0 . •cl^fSTSfc”«% l» t * A , ^ -i 5 i I A 3 "1^1I, J, yl-'liVitr*vr =#T# -5 I 3 I Tir“nir. , ■••' Ito I •- ,4i lilliiisj -51---------------------— -I V • E)C|STIf*^ RC5lt^c^lC^■.i/’/s"' CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 20, 1994 at 9;00 p.m. in the Orono Council Chambers. 2780 Kelley Parkway, on the matter of proposed revisions to Orono Zoning Code Section 10.56. the Shoreland Management standards and requirements. The proposed revisions include: Revised definitions of "water oriented accessory structure" and "steep slope". Reclassification of French Lake North Basin and Sewage Lagoon as wetland basins. Prohibition on intensive vegetation clearing and tree removal in the bluff impact zone. Certain "housekeeping" revisions. All persons wishing to be heard in regards to this matter will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. The proposed amendments are available in the City Office for review. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator To be published in the Pioneer and Laker the week of June 6, 1994, ---- ."TTWIl ■ ■ L NO 10' . SECOND SERIES AN ORMNA^cl ESTi^SHING REGDLATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OP SHORBLANDS +.h#> citv of Orono ordains as follows: The The City Council orono is anended by adding Ordinancemunicipal code of the City or urouu jjo. lOly Second Series: section 1. Section 10.56 is hereby added to the Municipal Zoning Code as follows: SECTION 10.56. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT. c 1 statement of Purpose. The purpose of this Subd. 1. • health, safety, and general section is to the subdivision, use and development welfare by providing for that exist within the City’s of shorelands abutting ricoonizes that the uncontrolled coroorate boundar-es. - - neaative imoact on not only use-and development of =tote^nds has^a ^^reational, the quality of ?“t-ace wate , t ^ ^ ^he waters they and natural environmental varues or sno surround. The specific intent of this section the tto?tlatd"L«fitich are compatible with Orono's Comprehensive Land Use Management Plan. values of Orono's lakes. ? Statutory Authorization. This shoreland ordinance's adopted pursuant to the L°au\\ti:n^,^?arts^Y20^^^^^^ and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. Subd. 3. Definitions. Unless below, words or phrases used in this section shall be as defined IlsewLre in this chapter. All other words or Phrases shall be interpreted so as to give them molt have in common usage and so as wO give thi the words reasonable application. For ’^jV^nlrmts^'ive All -must- and "shall" are mandatory and measureddistances, unless otherwise specified, shall be measur horizontally. 1. "Animal Feedlot" - A lot or ‘"“i combination of lots and buildings intended ^ feeding, breeding, raising or holding of animals and ®P® , . qj. design^ed as a confinement area in which manure may accumul * where the concentration of animals is such that a vege ^^ this cannot be maintained within the enclosure. For purpose of this iJUSimi s/^ -J- riTjriTTJATJPV NO 10^ r SECOND SHRXES AN ORwScE ESTAB l TSHING REGOLATIONS FOR TEE MANAGEMENT OF SHORELAHDS . ^ ritv of Orono ordains as fol lows: The muni o“f" tL City of Orono is amended by adding Ordinance jjo. 101 » Second Series: "Action 1. section 10.56 is hereby added to the Municipal Zoning Code as follows: SECTION 10.56. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT. Subd. 1. statement gaiety .‘‘'and gLeral section is to ^|se subdivision, use and development welfare by providing for that exist within the City's of shorelands citv recoanizes that the uncontrolled corporate boundaries. , j has "a neaative imcact on not onlyuse and development of =hojelands has a negar recreational, V • th"’^°lhe City" bT a! lo°w “in “devlLcmL"t ""ses" in tht IholelanfLeafilich are Lmpatible with Orono''s Comprehensive Land Use Management Plan. B. Provide appropriate standards for development wa«t qiVity'anS'the^'lo.^^^^^^ nalu^raTTnvironm^nt values of Orono ’s lakes. qubd 2. Statutory Authorization. This ordinance is adopied pursuant to the Re%"u\\tions,'Sarts7l"o!2“oO-6l"or3900: and ?he planning a.nd zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. subd. 3. Definitions. Unless below, words or phrases used in this section shall nhrases as dek^I^Td elsewLre in this chapter. All other shall be interpreted so as to give them most have in common usage and so as wO gi . e tni the wordsreasonable application. For the purpose of this sec.-ion, th "must” and "shall" are t^P-l^tory and not permissi distances, unless otherwise specified, shall horizontally. 1. "Animal Feedlot" - A lot or combination of lots and buildings intended feeding, breeding, raising or holding of animals and . _j- design^ed as a confinement area in which manure may accumul ' where the concentration of animals is such that a f this cannot be maintained within the enclosure. For purpose of this s\".rr„or./i:?sU^e^/rart o. t.e .xuf.,= shoreland area; A.Part or all of the feature is located in a B. The slope rises at least 25- above the ordinary High Water Level of the water body, r "’he crade of the slope from the toe of the 'aKnve *-he Ordinarv High Water Level bluff to a DOint 25- or more above .he orain . averages 30% or greater; and D.The slope must drain toward the water body. 3. "Bluff impact Zone ” - A bluff and land located within 20' from the top of a bluff. 4. -commercial Use” - The “'‘trlL'Sf land and/or buildings for the sale, lease, rental or products, goods, and services. s "Deck" - A horizontal, unenclosed :^trih%T^r%^\%i^^na^“l^^?IIktJr^ra%^^^^^^ u°se on^te!^ 6. _ "Duplex, Triplex, Quad" - “/,7„%“r“ve!y!Quaa — ^ ^ on a single 1,°{. having t%quippid” i!tiirg “fcfkii,^rtTng:^Uvrg^;T :3:-Spersons using temporary or movable shelter, incxua y 2^0C3T6ationa 1 v6hiclG sitGS* 8. "Dwelling Site" - A designated location where a dwelling unit is intended to be constructed. rivfVi^“^?As£r2.lKresidential purposes, including provisions for , but not colkTng and sanitation for not more than one family. I ^ including rooms in motels# hotels# nursing homes# boarding houses nor trailers# tents# cabins# recreational vehicles# nor lodging •ooms. 10. "Extractive Use" - The use of land for surface or subsurface removal of sand# gravel# rock industrial minerals# other nonmetal lie minerals# and peat not reg lated under Minnesota Statutes Sections 93.44 - 93.51. 11. "Forest Land Conversion" - forested lands to prepare for a new land establishment of a subsequent forest stand. The clear cuttino of use other than 're- 12. "Industrial Use" - The use of land or buildings for the production, manufacture# warehousing# storage# or transfer of goods# products, commodities# or other wholesale items. 13. "Intensive Vegetation Clearing" - The complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch# strip, row# or block. 14. "Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL)" - The boundary of public waters and wetlands# and shall be an elevation delineating the^ highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. For watercourses# the ordinary high water level is the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. For reservoirs and flowages# the ordinary high water level is the operating elevation of the normal summer pool. The designated OHWL has been determined bv the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for certain water bodies as shown in Subdivision 7 of this section. 15. "Planned Unit Development (PUD)" - A type of development characterized by a unified site design for a number of residential dwelling units or non-residential sites on a parcel# whether for sale, rent# or lease# often involving clustering of units or si«_es to provide areas of common open space or a mixture of structure types and land uses. Two types of PUD are provided for in the zoning code: ^ "Planned Residential Development (PRD)" - rhe nature of allowed uses is non-transient residential# including attached and detached single family or multiple family dwellings, subject to the limitations provided for in each zoning district. _ -j M "Planned Unit Development (PUD) - Highway 12 Corridor - ..he nature of allowed uses may include residential, commercial# institutional# public and semi-public uses as set forth in Orono s Comprehensive Plan Amendment No, 2# and it is limited to 12 Corridor as defined in said amendment. The Highway 12 PUD of.».ers a mixture of land uses# housing tvpes and Hiohwav^?7 pnn^^* which could be developed via the Highway 12 PUD are wit.hin the Shoreland Overlay District. r 16. "Public Use" - The use of land by the general public or by a public agency on behalf of the general public, for any purpose. 17. "Public Waters" - Any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 105.37, Subdivisions 14 and 15. 18. "Semi-public Use" - The use of land by a private, nonprofit organisation to provide a public service that is ordinarily open to some persons outside their regular constituency of the organization. 19. "Sensitive Resource Management" - The preservation and management of areas unsuitable for development in their natural state due to constraints such as shallow soils over groundwater or bedrock, highly erosive or expansive soils, steep slopes, susceptibility to flooding, or occurence of flora or fauna in need of special protection. 20. "Sewage Treatment System" - Septic tanks and a soil absorption system or other type of on-site sewage treatment system as described in Section 12.30 of the municipal code. 21. "Sewer System" - Pipelines or conduits, pumping stations and force main, and all other construction, devices, appliances, or appurtenances used for conducting sewage or industrial waste or other wastes to a point of ultimate disposal. 22. "Shore Impact Zone" - Land located between the Ordinary High Water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50% of the structure setback. 23. "Shore Setback Zone" - Land located between the Ordinary High Water Level of a Public Water and a line parallel to it at the structure setback. 24. "Shoreland" - Land located within the following distances from public waters: 1,000' from the Ordinary High Water level of a lake, pond, or flowage; and 300' from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a flood plain designated by ordinance on a river or stream, whichever is greater. WTiere tocooraohic divides occur at lesser distances from the involved wate'r,’ the limits of shoreland have been modified per the official map entitled Shoreland Overlay District on file at the City offices. 25. "Significant Historic Site" - Any archaeological site, standing structure, or other property that meets the criteria for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places or is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to be n unplatted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 307.08. A historic site meets these if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the qualifications for listing after review by the Minnesota State Archaeologist or the Director of the Minnesota mi rnnlat^ed cemeteries are automatically Historical Society. All ..^.5 considered to be significant his.or.c si.es. IS "Steeo Slope" - Lands having average siopef 26. Steep horizontal distances of 50' or18% or greater as measured over nori-on more» that are not bluffs. 27 "Surface Water-Oriented Commercial Use" - The ^/. ^“‘7 raM^-.o«;es. where access to and use of a use of land for in^eoral cart of the normal conductancesurface water feature is an integral of business. "Variance" - Variance shall mean the same as that ter. is in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 462. 24 "Water-Oriented Accessory Structure or raoility"^-.A -11 abov -ilding or other^-^^^^^^^^ L^%re rr t^e-r-l'atlonl i^^llc taTe\“ t'h^r^hereasonably needs be looated^cl^oee-^to^publ^i^ structures and ffciTiU«‘“ncludl boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decks. 25. "Wetland" - Shall have the same meaning as defined in Section 10.55 of the zoning code. Subd. 4. Jurisdiction. The provisions of shall apply to the shorelands of the public water bodies as classified in Subdivision 7 of this ordinance. subd. 5. Compliance. The use of any shoreland location of strlcrures"^on" lors: °tVf Italia'tiof^nd maintenance of rrfaffhf:fttifg'oTVhofe\a"nl vegetation, and f e's^blf isiof or“nd sfall be in%ull compliance with the terms of this section and other applicable regulations. Subd. 6. Enforcement. The Zoning Administrator is r^snonsible for the administration and e^iforcement of this ordinance. Any violation of the provisions of °[f^"iuding failure to comoly with any of its requirements (m . violations of conditions and safeguards constitute a with Grants of variances or conditional uses) shall const misdemeanor and shall be punishable as or not^a permit of this ordinance can occur regardless of whether in of Is required for a regulated activity pursuant to Subdivision 10 of this section. Subd. 7. Classification of Public Waters. |\^g^ent waters of the City of Orono have been classified below ^ 3300, with t.he criteria found in Minnesota Regulations, Part ^^20.33 , and the Protected waters Inventory Map for Hennepin County, r section Shall bo held to be The boundaries of the Shor official map. where determined by scaling di exact location of the boundaries interpretation is needed as to official map, the City Engineer of the district as =bown on the offp, „fgh shall make necessary '■"berp location of the district water level. The person '^“"“sting tne present his case\%'thV’city‘’fnrt7"submit technical evidence if he so desires. , a. • ar>/i Buildina Permits Required. Subd. 10. Land ^J;^®^^^gtruction of buildings, building A permit is required for bhe con decks and signs, additions, related ®“^f sg„age treatment systems, grading and installation or alteration of "^3 as regulated elsewhere in filling activities, nnd other ac.ivlti the City of Orono Municipal Ccae- c Kri n Certificate of Zoning Compliance. The Zoning Subd. 11. Certiti of Zoning Compliance i-or Administrator shall issue ^ soecified in Subdivision 10 of each activity will specify that the use of land this section. This of this ordinance. Any use, conforms to the requiremen .^^^ge with that authorized by arrangement, or construe \ of this ordinance and shall be permit shall be ceemed a ^"f this section, punishable as provided in Subdivision Subd. 12. Variances. Variances accordance with Minnesota iance is approved after regulated in has formally receminended denial the Department of Natu-al Resource ^ ^ aoproved variance in the hearing record, the Tlso include the Planningrequired elsewhere .in this sect^^^^^ ,, re°=TrV/lus°tim:ny^^d^'h"e findings of facts and conclusions whach supported the issuance of the variance. subd. 13. conditional Uses. within shoreland areas =ball be subjec^ to the revr^ procedures, and criteria and conditions additional the Shoreland Qveirlsiy DistirictJ A. Evaluation Criteria. A thorough ®'^®bbati(^^ ^ ^ construction; 2. The visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is limited; J 3 The site is adequate for water supply and on-site sewage treatment; and A The types, uses and numbers of watercraft 4. The yp r'nmnatible in relation to the that the project will safely accomodate these watercraft,suitability of public waters to sateiy Attached to Conditional Use Permits. B. A^ation of the criteria listed above The City Council ‘^°AAtlnce, shall attach such conditions to and the purposes of ^his ordinan ^^mits as it deems necessary the issuau e of the conditio ordinance. Such conditions may to fulfil: the fo^^^^^include but are not limited to the ^oxx y 1. increased setbacks from the Ordinary High Water Level; 2 Limitations on the natural vegetation to be removed or the requirement that additiona planted; a i s^iuctu^er^te^a^«“nt%°;st?ml watelc^f; farnrhlnranrL°oLnrrr«s:^;nd vehicle parking areas. Subd. 14. Notifications to the Deparjiment^o^^^^^^ ron:L^:rvarfa “n^c^%^ aU^Ln!l£oJ section must be sent to the . least 10 davs before the Natural Resources and P°fconsider proposed hearings. Notices of ^ ^he subdivision/plat. subdivisions/plats must inclu copy of approved aL°ndm'eVi"s\nd"VuSdivLions/plat^s^,^an^^^ th^^^SsTiorr'ofThe '^Department, of Natural Resources and postmarked within 10 days of final action. subd. 15. zoning District Requirements. The zoning "district standards of C^p^. width, Orono Municipal currently ^ standards set forth by the Overlay District; LR-IA LR-IB LR-IC LR-lC-1 RR-IA RR-IB RR-lB-1 RS ;r The following Orono zoning districts are also potentially 8 available for use within the shoreland areas: S-6 PUD R-13 R-IA Any future changes within the zoning districts listed above shall meet the DNR regulations effective 7-3-89. Subd. 16. Shoreland Overlay District Standards. The Shoreland Overlay District Standards are in addition to the requirements set forth in Chapter 10 for the varxcus zoning districts. In case of conflict, the most restrictive provision applies. A. Minimtam Lot Area/Lot Width Standards. Minimum lot area and lot width standards of the underlying zoning district shall apply, with the following exceptions: 1 No lot within 1000 feet of a General Development Lake and approved for duplex use per Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (5) shall be less than 135 feet in 26,000 square feet in area if riparian, nor less than 17,500 sq feet in area if non-riparian. 2. No lot within 300’ of a tributary and approved for duplex use per Section 10.20, Subd. 3 (I) shall be less than 150 feet in width when no sewer is available, nor less than 115 feet in width when sewer is available. B. Lakeshore Accei»s Lots. Lots intended as accesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use by owners of non-riparian lots within subdivisions are permissible and must meet the following minimum standards: 1. Any such lakeshore access lot shall be designated as an outlet, and shall not be considered as a buildable residential lot. 2. Such an outlet shall not be subject to minimum lot area or width standards, except that the number of inland non-riparian lots which may gain access via such outlet shall not exceed the number obtained by dividing the outlet wid measured at the shoreline by the required zoning district lot width, rounded down to the nearest whole number. 3. Such outlet shall be jointly owned by all owners of non-riparian lots in the subdivision who are provided riparian access rights on the access outlet. 4. No such access outlet shall be created as part of a subdivision plat except when the building lots within the subdivision are separated by an existing public or private roadway from the lakeshore, and the land on either side of the roadway was in common ownership as of the effective date of this ordinance. c; Covenants or other equally effective legalmmmsmm recreational activities . ^^^ter or the enjoyment of normalgeneral public use of the public water or^^ Examples of the non ­ property include swimming, sunbathing, or picnicing. The J^Tnu^ber o£ watercraft allowed to allowed to be parked and th® stored over water, and must be continuously moored, do ' facilities and activities in require the lot to minimize topographic and the most suitable location _„_a. also reouire all parking areas, vegetation alterations. facilities to be screened by storage buildings, and o practical from view from thevegetation or toP<=?”Phy aa lauch covenants public water, assuming summer, ieat are subject to City approval. C. ?f^^stru^ctures°and°fVci must ^e"locrteTtoteeTal"%e?btc)cs. 'structures shall be located as follows ; 1. Structure and On-site Sewage System Serbacks (in feet) from Ordinary High Water Level: Setbacks Public Water Classification NE RD GD Tributary Structures Unsewered Sewered 150 100 75 100 150 75 75 75 Sewage Treatment Svstem 150 75 75 75 2. Additional structure setbacks. The following additional structure setbacks apply, regar ess classification of the water body: Setback from: Top of bluff Unplatted cemetery Right-of-way line of federal, state or county highway and local public and private roads Setback (in feet) 30 50 30* Except for detached garages on for regulated in Section 10.03, Subd. ^^ j,d structures subject to less restrictive va^ous adjacent to street" setbacks as regulated in the zoning districts. 3. Bluff impact zones. Structures and accessory facilities, except stairways, landings, and lock boxes, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. 4. Uses without water-oriented needs. Uses without water-oriented needs must be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must either be set back double the normal Ordinary High Water level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. 5, Fences, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall be placed within the shore setback zone. Portions of dock located landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject to the regulations for landings per Subdivision 16 (F) of this section. Retaining walls shall not be placed within the shore setback zone. t. Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except that this does not apply to Stairways^ lifts# landing's# and lockboxas* Further# the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes, and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. D. Minimum Lowest Floor Elevations. All structures located within the Shoreland Overlay District which subject to the flood plain regulations of Section 10.55 of this ordinance shall be placed at an elevation consistent with the requirements of that section. The regulatory flood protecta^n elevation shall be established as set forth in Section 10.55, Subd. 7 of this code. All structures constructed within the Shoreland Overlay District shall have their lowest floor, including basement, placed at an elevation no lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. Where the regulatory flood plain elevation cannot reasonably be determined, the minimum elevation at which the lowest floor, including basement, may be placed shall be determined as follows: 1. For lakes, by placing the lowest floor at a level at least 3 feet above the highest known water level, or 3 feet above the Ordinary High Water Level, whichever is higher. 2. For rivers and streams, by placing the lowest floor at least 3 feet above the flood of record. E. Water-oriented Accessory Structures. The only water-oriented accessory structure allowed to be located nearer" the Ordinary High Water Level than the normal structure setback as specified in this section shall be a lock box no greater than 20 square feet in area and no higher than 48 inches in height. Such a structure requires a building permit from the City. r >r L Si!rwld“in"°h‘e%“o\“-setL“i^ -ne and .nst .net the folIowan, design requirements; 1.Stairways and lifts must not exceed 4 feet in width. 2. Landings for stairways and lifts shall not exceed 32 square ‘feet in area. 3. canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings. , qhAirwavs, lifts and landings may be 5. Stairways, lifts and landings must be on conditions, whenever practical. 6. Facilities P-^,7^^:el"prlv?d^^ access to Physically handicapped persons shall^^ subitems 1 - 5 frrcrple\"ed"YnTddi\"ion"“o°the reguirements of the Minnesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. 7 A building permit shall be of stairways, lifts and landings regardless of w ISSrimproeLlntrarr7on'structed above, at or below grade. permit for con'strultio? of sewage “-V^n^steer^Sp^s,%ha^'i driveways, structures, or other to evaluate possible provide adequate information msan*- of visibility from public rrerer/VroIiSn^nrpreserve existing vegetation^^ ^L%“a%^e“^oVpub^^^^^’atVrsr"a^srirg vegetation. H Height of Structures. No set Shoreland Overlay District shall exceed the height ^h®t forth in the standards for the underlying zoning district. I# Vegetation Alterations* 1. No live tree within 75 feet of the r a rfi^meter of 6 inches or more (or 19 inches in removed without first obtaining a permit from the City staff provided that at least the equivalent number of .eplacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable to the staff are planted at the same setback from the shoreline as those removed. APPeals of staff determinations as to type, size and quality of the trees to be replaced will be to the Council. Removal of trees that are dead shall not require a permit but such trees must be inspected by City staff prior to their removal. 2. Intensive vegetation clearing within 75 trimming of trees of any size is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to accomodate the placement of permitted stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted lock boxes, provided that the screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced. J. Topographic Alterations/Grading and Filling ]. Grading and filling and excavations necessary for the construction'of structures, sewage treatment systems, and driveways under validly issued construction permits for these facilities* do not require the issuance of a separate grading and fillina permit. However, all grading and filling activity approved permits for construction of structures, _ sewage treatment systems, and driveways shall adhere to the grading and filling standards of this section. 2. Grading, filling and excavating is prohibited within 75' of the Ordinary High Water Level of the public waters enumerated in Subdivision 7 of this section. 3. Public and private roads, driveways, parking areas, and public or private watercraft access ramps shall not be constructed within 75' of the Ordinary High Water Level ot the public waters enumerated in Subdivision 7 of this section. If no alternatives exist, such improvements shall be subject to the standard zoning variance review procedure, and such review shall take into account the following considerations: a. Such improvements shall be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters. b. All roads and parking areas shall be designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters consistent with the requirements of all agencies with jurisdiction. ;■ ■| j r 4 Except for those projects requiring permits for construction required as and driveways, a le.nd alterai^iuu f follows: a For moveraent of 1-100 cubic yards of . •♦-v.in shoreland Overlay District, a staffmaterial anywhere within the snorexan issued land alteration permit shall be requirea. b For movement of more than 100 cubic • I T^i^hin the Shoreland Overlay District, yards of material { bv the City Council is required inconditional use permit approval by tne permit, addition to the required land alteratio p e; The following considerations and V. A A ♦.« rinrina the issuance of construction pe-"ts, conditional use permits. variances and subdivision approvals. a Grading or filling in any Type 2, 3, , a 4.1 be evaluated to determine how 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 activity would affect the followingextensive 1 y the proposea acwiv x functional qualities of the wetland: and retention; (1) Sediment and pollutant trapping (2) Storage of surface run-off to orevent or reduce flocd damage; (3) Fish and wildlife habitat; (4) Recreational use; (5) Shoreline or bank stabilization; (6) Noteworthiness, including spe­ cial qualities such as historic significance, critical habitat or endangered plants and animals, or others. This evaluation must also include a determination of whether the wetland f requires permits, reviews, or approvals by other ®A^.^ts, Fe^ral agencies including but not limited to spates Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the United S Army Corps of Engineers. b. Alterations must be designed ^nd conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible; c. Mulches or similar materials used, where necessary, for temporary bare soil -ible; permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as po d. Methods to minimize soil to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature be used; r e. Altered areas must be stabilized to ^ standards consistent with the field lllfle technical guides of the districts and the United States Soil Conservation Service, Pill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope; <4» • g Plans to place fill or excavated material on steeo slopes m'ust be reviewed by the City Engineer for Stntinued slope’stabi lity and must not create finished slopes of 30% or greater? h. Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones; i. Any alterations below the Ordinary Hiah Water Level of public waters must first be authorized by the LLissioner of the Department of Natural Resources under Minnesota Statutes, Seciton 105.42; j. Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby property; k. Placement of natural rock rip rap, including associated grading of the shoreline a^id placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope dees not e. 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical, the landward extent of the rip rap is within 10 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level, and the height of the rip rap above the Ordinary High Water Level does not exceed 3 feet. A rip rap permit shall be obtained per the requirements of Section 10.03, Subdivisions 22, 23 and 24 of this zoning code. 6. Connections to Public Waters. Excavations where the intended purpose is connection to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons, and harbors, are prohibited above tne Ordinary High Water Level. Such excavations below the elevation or the Ordinary High Water Level are subject to approval of tne Department of Natural Resources and other agencies witn concurrent jurisdiction. K. Storm Water Management. The following general and specific standards shall apply in addition to those standar s found in Sections 10.55 and 11.41 of the Orono Municipal Code: 1. When possible, existing natural drainaaeways, wetlands, and vegetated soil surfaces must be used to convey, store, filter and retain storm water run-off before discharge to public waters. 2. A development must be planned conducted in a manner that will minimize the extent of disturbed areas, run-off velocities, erosion potential, and reduce and delay J run-off volunes. Disturbed areas must be stabilited and protected as soon as possible and facilities or methods used to retain sediment on the site. 3. When development density, topographic features and soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to ilequateiy handle storm water run-off using vegetation, various types of constructed facilities such as diversions, settling basins, skimming devices, dikes, waterways, and ponds may be used. Preference must be given to designs using surface drainage, vegetation, and infiltration rather than buried pipes and manmade materials and facilities. 4. When constructed facilities are used to perform water management, documentation must be provided by a registered professional civil engineer that they are designed and installed consistent with the field office technical guide of the local soil and water conservation district. 5. New constructed storm water outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. L. Hardcover Limitations. 1. No hardcover or impervious surface shall be placed, located, or constructed within 75 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level of any lake or tributary, except for stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes as regulated elsewhere in the Municipal Code. 2. Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Between 250 feet and 500 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 30% hardcover. Between 500 feet and 1000 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 35% hardcover. M. Standards for Commercial, Public, and Semi- Public Uses. 1. Surface water-oriented commercial uses and public or semi-public uses with similar needs to have access to and use of public waters may be located on parcels or lots with frontage on public waters, if permitted by the underlying zoning district standards. Those uses with water-oriented needs must meet the following standards: a. In addition to meeting impervious coverage (hardcover) limits, setbacks, and other zoning standards in this ordinance, the uses must be designed to incorporate topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and structures. b. Uses that require short-term watercraft mooring for patrons must centralize these facilities, and design them to avoid obstructions of nav^igation and to be the minimum size necessary to meet the need. c. Uses that depend on patrons arriving by watercraft may use the minimum amount of signage and lighting necessary to convey needed information to the public, subject to the following general standards: (1) No advertising signs or supporting facilities for signs may be placed in or upon public waters. Signs conveying information or safety messages may be placed in or on public waters by a public authority or under a permit issued by the County Sheriff. (2) Signs may be placed, when necessary, within the shore setback zone if they are designed in size to be the minimum necessary to convey needed information. They must only convey the location and name of the establishment and the general types of goods or services available. The signs must not contain other detailed information such as product brands and prices, must not be located higher than 10 feet above the ground, and must not exceed 32 square feet in size. If illuminated by artificial lights, the lights must be shielded or directed to prevent illumination out across public waters. (3) The aggregate square footage of sign space per property shall not exceed the limitations on sign square footage as regulated in Section 10.61. (4) Non-sign related outside lighting may be located within the lakeshore setback zone or over public waters only if it is used primarily to illuminate potential safety hazards and is shielded or otherwise directed to prevent direct illumination out across public waters. This does not preclude use of navigational lights. 2. Uses without water-oriented needs must be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must either be set back double the normal Ordinary High Water Level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. N. Agricultural Use Standards. !• When permitted in the underlying zoning district, general cultivation farming, grazing, nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, and wild crop harvesting shall be allowed in the Shoreland Overlay District except that no such activity shall occur within the shore setback zone nor on steep slopes^ or bluff impact zones. Steep slopes, shore setback zone and bluff impact zones shall be maintained in permanent vegetation. 2. Animal feedlots must meet the following standards: 17 a. New feedlots, if pernitted, must not j of watercourses or in bluff impact be located in minirnun setback of 300 feet from the Ordinarytones and must meet a minimum setu<a»- . ^ High water Level of all public waters basins, and t) Modifications or expansions to existing feedlots that are located within 300 feet of the Ordinary Hiih u.lor Level or within a bluff impact zone are allowed if they do^no^fu" he% eLroach into the existing Ordinary High Water Level setback or encroach on bluff impact zones. 0. Forest Management Standards. The harvesting of timber and associated reforestation must be conducted consistent with the provisions of the Minnesota Non-Point Source Pollution Assessment-Forestry and the provisions of Water Quality in Forest Management "Best Management Practices in .Iinnesota . p. Extractive Use Standards. 1 Site Develooment and Restoration Plan. An extractive use site* development and restoration plan must be developed, approved, and followed over the course of operation of the site. The plan must address dust, noise, ^^^p^ted discharges, hours and duration of operation, and anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations. It must also identify actions to be taken during operation to mitigate environmental impacts, particularly erosion, and must clearly explain how the site will be rehabilitated after extracti activities end. 2. Setbacks for Processing Machinery. Processing machinery must be located consistent with setback standards for structures from Ordinary High Water Levels of public waters and from bluffs. Q. Water Supply. Any public or private supply of water for domestic purposes must meet or exceed standards for water quality of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. R. Sewage Treatment. Any premises used for human occupancy must be provided with an adequate method of sewage treatment per Municipal Code Section 12.30. On-site treatment systems must be setback from the Ordinary High wa Level in accordance with the setbacks contained in Section IO.do, Subdivision 16 (C). Non-conforming sewage treatment systems shai be regulated and upgraded in accordance with Subd. 17 of tnis ordinance. S. Significant historic sites. No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that aftec the values of the site unless adequate information about the sit has been removed and documented in a public repository. Subd. 17. Nonconformities. All legally established rtf date of this ordinance may continue nonconformities as of t. e aate wi- u subject to aoDlicable State Statutes and as regulated elsewhere in the Orono Municipal Code. In shoreland areas, the following standards shall also apply: A. Construction on Nonconforming Lots of Record. Development or use of existing lots of record shall be regulated as set forth in Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 of the Orono Zoning Code. B. Additions/Expansions to Nonconforming Structures. All additions or expansions to the outside dimensions of an existing nonconforming structure must meet the setback, height, and other requirements set forth in the Orono Zoning Code. Any deviation from these requirements must be authorized by a variance pursuant to provisions of the zoning chapter. C. Nonconforming Sewage Treatment Systems. A nonconforming sewage treatment system as defined in Section i2.30 and located within the Shoreland Overlay District must be upgraded and made conforming, at a minimum, at any time a permit or variance of any type is required for any improvement on, or use of, the pj-Qperty. Further, the nonconforming sewage treatment system provisions of Section 12.30 shall apply to all shoreland areas. Subd. 18. Subdivision/Platting Provisions. A. Land Suitability. Each lot created through subdivision, including Planned Unit Developments or Planned Residential Developments authorized elsewhere in the Zoning and Platting Codes, must be suitable in its natural state for the proposed use with minimal alteration. In analyzing the suitability of land for a specific use, the City shall consider susceptibility to flooding, existence of wetlands, soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, steep topography, inadequate water supply or sewage treatment capabilities, near-shore aquatic conditions unsuitable for water- based recreation, important fish and wildlife habitat, presence of significant historic sites, or any other feature of the natural land likely to be harmful to the health, safety or welfare of future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. B. Consistency with Other Controls. Subdivisions shall conform to all official controls of the City of Orono. Subdivision will not be approved where a later variance from one or more standards in the official controls would be needed to use the lots for their intended purpose. In areas not served by publicly owned sewer and water systems, a subdivision will not be approved unless adequate and conforming water supply and sewage treatment systems can be provided for each lot in conformance with Section 12.30 of the Municipal Code. Each lot shall meet the minimum lot size and dimensional requirements set forth elsewhere in the Code, including at least a minimum contiguous lawn area, that is free of limiting factors sufficient for the construction of two standard soil treatment systems. Lots that would require use of holding r tanks must not be approved. following information shall aiso 1. Topographic contours at 2 foot intervals showing limiting site characteristics. 9 The surface water features required in ?.* %n«; n? Subdivision 1, to be shown on piats?°o\%f“er£%%rUn “ted Stat.; Geological Survey quadrangle topographic naps or more accurate sources. h 'Id- f„ron-\\t%°-tagf?r:a^^°ut“p"^^^^^^^^ suitability for building an existing sources or from field methods. , tent of ^"*trcfpaTed”v"rgtra"tio"n\“nrttUg^^^^^^ :?^^r%t\“ln%^/keL^%To\e°lquatic|onam^^^^ after construction activities. 5. Location of 100 year flood plain areas and floodway districts from existing adopted maps or data. the lake or stream. Section 10.55 of the zoning code. E. Lakeshore Access Lots. Lots intended as ^oereirof-norri^Liar/iYs^tfh/r^r^di^^^^^^^^ exceed the minimum standards set forth in Subdivision section. Subd. 19. PRD/PUD Standards. Eesidential Pl^^nned^^J’nVt olv^LV-V' S!st%\°ir/'oV;e°/p7ofeVt ’s l\‘‘n\fr°/dVv\"l"opnent o^ ■ fA..------ r previouslv built sites, or conversions of existing buildings and land. Land use districts in which they are an allowable use are identified in the individual coning district descriptions in the zoning chapter. The following exclusion applies: 1. Rezoning to M-6 and development via the M- 6 PRD shall not be allowed within the Shoreland Overlay District. B. Commercial PUDs. Commercial Planned Unit Developments are limited to land within the Highway 12 corridor as set forth in the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 adopted May 23, 1988. The following further restriction shall apply: 1. No land located within the Shoreland Overlay District shall be developed via a commercial PUD. Any proposed amendment to the zoning code which would allow cor^ercial PUD development within the Shoreland Overlay District shall be subject to review by the Department of Natural Resources to ensure consistency with DNR* requirements for shoreland areas. C. Processing of Residential Planned Unit Developments. Residential Planned Unit Developments (PRDs) shall be processed as a conditional use permit as required by the individual zoning district standards. D. Application for a Planned Residential Development. The applicant for a PRD must submit the following documents, in addition to the information required in Section 10.32, prior to final action being taken on the application request: 1. A site plan and/or plat for the project showing locations of property boundaries, surface water^ features, existing and proposed structures and other facilities, land alterations, sewage treatment and water supply systems (where public systems will not be provided), and topographic contours at 2 foot intervals. 2. Property owners association agreement with mandatory membership, in accordance with the requirements of this ordinance. 3. Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements or other instruments that: a) Properly address future vegetative and topographic alterations, construction of additional buildings, and beaching of watercraft; b) Ensure the long-term preservation and maintenance of open space in accordance with the criteria and analysis specified in this ordinance. 4. Those additional documents as requested by r i I r-# I [ I tt.e City of Orono that are necessary to explain how the PRD will be desicned and will function. E Site "Suitable Area" Evaluation. Proposed new or expansions to existing PRDs must be evaluated using the following procedures and standards to determine the suitable area for the dwelling unit/dwelling site density evaluation. 1 The project parcel must be divided into tiers by locating one or more lines approximately parallel to a Xine that identifies the Ordinary High Water Level at the following intervalsr proceeding landward: Shoreland Tier Dimensions General development lakes- first tier General development lakes“^ second and additional tiers Recreational development lakes Natural environment lakes Tributaries Unsewered Sewered (feet)(feet) 200 200 267 200 267 267 400 320 300 300 2. The suitable area within each tier is next calculated bv excluding from the tier area all wetlands, bluffs or land below the Ordinary High Water Level of public waters. This suitable area and the proposed project are then subjected to the PRD density evaluation steps to arrive at an allowable number or dwelling units or sites. F.PRD 'Allowable Density* Evaluation. The procedures for determining the allowable density of a PRD is as follows : 1. The suitable area within each tier is divided by the single residential lot size standard of the underlying zoning district, yielding the allowable number of dwelling units or sites for each tier (Fractions shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number, but may be transferred as noted below ). 2. Allowable densities or numbers of units or excess fractions of units may be transferred from any tier to any other tier further from the water body, but must not be transferred to any other tier closer. 3. No density increases based on increased setbacks or other factors will be allowed. G. Maintenance and Administration Requirements. 1. Before final approval of a PRD, adequate r —Li r • • ^or oreservation and maintenance in prov:LSions the continued existence and perpetuity of open spaces anu i- functioning of the development. 2 Open Space Preservation. Deed rest'ictions, covenants, permanent easenents, public dedication and acle^ilnce or other equally effective and permanent means must be provided to ensure long-term preservation and maintenance of open space. The instruments must include all of the following protections: a.Commercial uses prohibited. b. Vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited. c. Construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials prohibited. d.Uncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited 3. Development^ organization and functioning. Unless an equally effective alternative community framework is estlb^ished^ when applicable, all P.RD's must use an owners association with the following features: a. Membership must be mandatory for each dwelling unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers. b. Each member must pay a pro rata share of the Association's expenses, and unpaid assessments can become liens on units or sites. c. Assessments must be adjustable to accomodate changing conditions. d. The Association must be responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. H. Open Space Requirements. PRD's must contain open space meeting all of the following criteria. 1. At least 50% of the total project area must be preserved as open space. 2. The following items shall not be included in the computation of minimum open space: a. Dwelling units or sites. b. Road rights-of-way. c. Land covered by road surfaces A.*,., d. Parking areas. e.Structures. f. Commercial facilities or uses. 3. The following items shall be included in the computation of minimum open space: a.Wetlands. b. Significant historic sites. c. Unplatted cemeteries d. Other areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state. e. The lakeshore setback zone, based on normal required structure setbacks, must be included as open space. For PRDs, the entire lakeshore setback zone must be preserved in its natural or existing state, except for those improvements necessary to provide reasonable pedestrian access to the water body as regulated elsewhere in the zoning code. 4. Open space may include subsurface sewage treatment systems if the use of the space is restricted to avoid adverse impacts on the systems. 5. The appearance of open space areas, including topography, vegetation, and allowable uses, must be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means. I. Erosion Control and Stormwater Management. Erosion control and stormwater management plans must be developed and the PRD must: 1, Be designed and the construction managed to minimize the likelihood of serious erosion occurring either during or after construction. This must be accomplished by limiting the amount and length of time of bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities, vegetated buffered strips, or other appropriate techniques must be used to minimize erosion impacts on surface water features. Erosion control plans approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District may be required if project size and site physical characteristics warrant; and 2. Be designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably expected quantities and qualities of storm water run**off. Xmoervrous an., muImpervious surface coverage within any tier must not exceed 25% of the tier area except that credit for unused hardcover I -K'— — r allowance in tiers near the lake aay be used in tiers further from the lake. j Centralization and Design of Facilities. Centralization aid design of faciaties and structures must be done according to the following stcindards: 1. PKD c aSt be connected to publicly owned water suoply and sewer systems, if available. On-site water supply and sewace treatment svstems r ust be centralized and designed and installed to meet or e'xceed a,plicable standards or rules of the Minnesota Department of Healch, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and as regulated elsewhere in this ordinance. On-site sewage treatment systems must be located on the most suitable areas of the development, and sufficient lawn area free of limiting factors must be provided for a replacement soil treatment system for each sewage system. 2. Dwelling units or sites must be clustered into one or more groups and located on suitable areas cf the development. Thev must be desicned and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standards for the relevant shoreland classification; a. Setback from the Ordinary High Water Level . features . b. o • Elevation above the surface water Maximum height. 3. Shore recreation facilities including but not limited to swimming areas, docks and watercraft mooring areas, must be centralized and located in an area suitable for them. Evaluation of suitability must include consideration of land slope, water depth, vegetation, soils, depth to ground water and bedrock or other relevant factors. The number of dwelling units or sites which may be granted lake access shall not exceed the number of riparian dwelling units or sites which could be created under a standard subdivision. The allowable number of dock slips or moorings and the designation of which dwelling units or sites shall have the right to use those slips or moorings shall be subject to Council approval and shall be defined in the covenants governing the PRD. In no case shall the number of slips or moorings exceed the number allowed under the official controls of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. All docks serving three or more dwelling units shall be subject to the Joint Use Dock Licensing requirements in Chapter 5 of the Orono Municipal Code. 4. Structures. Parking areas and other facilities must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the City, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening must be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be 25 r provided . 5 Accessory structures and facilities must • j 1^,-r, 1 structure setback and must be cSJt\ali%e?,‘’“xcept'^for those pedestrian access and equipment storaae structures allowed elsewhere in this code. K Conversion. Existing resorts or other land uses and may be converted to Planned Residential Developments if all of the following standards are met: 1. Proposed conversions must be initially evaluated using the same procedures for construction. Inconsistencies between existing features of the development and these standards must be identified. 2. Deficiencies involving water supply and sewaae treatment, impervious coverage, open space, and shore ?ecre^ation facilities must be corrected as part of the conversion or as specified in the conditional use permit. 3. Shore setback rone and bluff impact zone deficiencies must be evaluated and reasonable improvements be made as part of the conversion. These improvements must include where applicable the following: a. Removal of docks, or other facilities that no longe shore setback zone or bluff impact zone. extraneous ouildings, need to be located in b. Remedial measures to correct erosion sites and improve vegetative cover and screening of buildings and other facilities as viewed from the water. c. If existing dwelling units are located in the shore setback zone or bluff impact zone, conditions shall be attached to approvals of conversions that preclude exterior expansions in any dimension or substantial alterations. The conditions must also provide for future relocation of dwelling units, where feasible, to other locations, meeting all setback and alteration requirements when they are rebuilt or replaced. 4. Existing dwelling unit or dwelling densities that exceed the standards in Subdivision 19(F) may be allowed to continue but must not be allowed to be increased, eit e at the time of conversion or in the future. Efforts must be during the conversion to limit impacts of high densities y requiring seasonal use, improving vegetative screening, centralizing shore recreation facilities, installing new sewag treatment systems, or other means. Subd. 20. Riparian Access and Rights. For properties which as a result of the designation of the OHWL are found to a u the boundary of a lake, stream, or tributary, no section of this Code shall be construed as obligating the City of Orono to approve r r,^ovic;ions of the Code prohibiting physical variances to ® i alteration within orotected itiprovetients, ^^33 or shorelands. Nothing in the Code wetlands, flood establishino or increasing riparian rights. sectlon^'orihe Code is “ = ^ establish building and soning restrictions only. Subd. 21. Amendments. All amendments to this section, * X. in3Ds# musti be submitwCd to tri0 including Dsbar?'ent Resources prior to surml\"t‘'eV^o th^e'eoLissioner of the Department of Natural Resources prior to adoption. section 2. .Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.02, Definitions, is hereby revised as follows; A Def’nition 13, "Building Height", is hereby deleted and a new definifi'on of "Building Height" inserted in its place, as follows; 13. "Building Height" - The er® ten B^ibfcfritiS's^rtT fy eS PhSSVo/Vh^^fg h e s" Ta1= 'a P i ^ Topooraohic changes which elevate the adjoining 9^°“"° determining the 'existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building height. 3. Definition 43, "Lot Width", is hereby repealed and the following definition inserted in its place; 43. "Lot Width" - The horizontal distance between side lot lines measured at the following locations; a. For lots which do not abut a lake or tributary, at the rear of the required front yard, measure parallel to the front lot line. b. For lots which abut a lake or tributary, at the shoreline measured in a straight line between the which the side lot lines intersect the OHWL, and at the structU2T6 sstbsLck from tho OHWL# measursd in 3 s rai^ , vVio between the points of intersection of the side lot lines with the structure setback line. c. ^ is herebv repealed and the. . cQ "Cfucture , is .Definition 69, place:definition inserted .n It i!nd“'o^.nrpiece o£ work » na?ts joined ?ogether in or rcoltion on, a ^ocat^on on the ground, land, or attached to something having a water. . • ^ rode Section 10.55, Flood Plain section 3. Municipal amended as follows: and Wetlands Managemen , 10. "Ordinary A. section ^0*5 5, subdivision^ l;d" the"following definition High Water Mark , is ne^e: . inserted in its place: /hhwlI" - The 10. "Ordinary ^igh ^ater ^®^Yl bl an elevation boundary of public waters and has been maintained for aSeating the, highest -et« ^whr^ sufficient period of time 1 natural vegetation changes fr commonly that P°t"^ raaominantly terrestrial. "atepredominantly aquatic to predomin elevation of the top courses, the ordinary high wate^ reservoirs and flowages, thol the bank of the channel For r aer ^^e normal ordinarv high water level i^^s been determined by tne summer ‘pool. The ^^tgnated OHWL^ha^s^ bodies L'"?nircatel\"n'Eection 10.56 of the Orono Muncipal Code. section 4. section 11.03, Subdivision Regulation Definitions, is hereby revised as follows: hereby a. For lots «‘'ich do n^o^t ebvt measured t-ibutary, at the rear the requir --- ” Fo:;:ts .ich .-t a i.,,, irt^il^n^^e rotnfs irrnt'e ‘’r^seft?on o"f the side lot lines with the Structure setback line. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES OF OUTLOT A, COUNTRYSIDE MANOR 2ND ADDITION. A TRACT A a L. S. NO. 1089 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA 7^/ arM : A# i*crts L ' ! - ‘0**^ M0tczz:- DICKEY PARCEL i it|||\ (.KDNKllU, l\( n MMHinxU Urmr PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES OF OUTLOT A COUNTRYSIDE MANOR 2ND ADDITION. & TRACT A. R. L. S. NO. 1089 _______ HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA lOB NO 1